Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 6 of Tract 12206 - Moody Circle - Ordinance 2869, 2912 REOUES i FOt CITY COUNCIL AC ION Date y Pmh P r l 7 0 1 9 R f f Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator _ Prepared b : James W. Palin Director Development Services e r� Y � � _ � i Subject: INTERIM MORATORIUM (ORDINANCE 2869) ON BUILDI PERMITS FOR LOT #6 OF TRACT 12206 ( MOODY CIRCLE ) Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Isms, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On October 6, 1986, the City Council*hopted interim Ordinance No. 2869 extending the moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 ( lot at southerly end of Moody Circle ) . Discussion of the building moratorium was continued to 11:e November 17, 1986 City Council meeting in order to allow the property owners and the developer to arrive at a compromise wit-Li City staff . At that time, the City Council can decide whether to allow the moratorium to continue or to repeal the ordinance by jeadop;: ing a new ordinance . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council continue the interim moratorium on building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12200' to allow more time for the property owners and developer to arrive at an agreement . Ordinance 2869 will then remain in effect until August 21 , 1987. ANALYSIS: On November 13, 1986, staff met with the developer , Jack Eroberg, and Mr. Moody to discuss optional design layouts . Five possibilities were reviewed and are summarized below: 1 . A change of zone and general plan amendment from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential ) on Broberg property which would vield approximately 49 units as opposed to 29 units (currently allowed) . A four to six month period of time will be required to process these entitlements . 2 . A 25% density bonus (7 units) for Broberg property resulting in a total of 36 units . 3. Integrate the area of Lot #6 of Moody Tract with Broberg property to achieve an additional 3 units to 36 (with Y(� .j bonus ) for a total 39 units . 4 . A 25% density bonus for one additional unit on 3 four-unit complexes within Moody Tract creating 3 five-plexes to compensate for the 3 unit loss on Lot #6 . Broberg property would yield 36 units (with density bonus) . 5 . No density bonus for Broberg property; Lot #6 used as a connector between Broberg property and Moody Circle; north end of Moody Circle be secured with a landscaped planter and ! emergency gate . Staff met with Mr . Moody and Mr . Obradovich (adjacent homeowner ) on } October 20, 1986, to discuss the aforementioned options . Staff reiterated to Mr . Moody to meet with Mr . Broberg to develop a feasible plan agreeable by the homeowners, Mr . Broberg and himself , as directed by the City Council . 1 Staff maintains the position that Pearce Drive should serve as the 1 main access point from Moody Circle t Bolsa Chica and that establishing multiple intersections among the six-lane major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicle on the public ; streets under these conditions . if Mocdy Circle is rerouted, staff supports alternative No. 3 + because three units permitted on not #6 would be shifted to the Broberg property and the density bonus request would be similar to other density bonuses granted elsewhere in the City. i As of November 12, 1986, Mr . Moody and M= . Broberg had not reached an agreement . ENVIP.ONMENTAL STATUS: The extension of the moratorium is categorically exempt . FUNDING SOURCE: i Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The City Council may adopt Ordinance No . repealing Ordinance No. 2869; or may repeal the ordinance concurrently with approval of j an agreement between the property owners. - ,! ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Ordinance No. 2. Request for City Council action dated October - 6, 1986 JWP:SH:kla RCA - 11/17/86 -2- (6634d) b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REPEALING URGENCY ORDINANCE 2869 ENACTING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206, IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE WhEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on October 6, i9bb enactea a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206; in the vicinity of Moody Circle for 10 months and 15 days . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to repeal Orainance 2669 removing the building noratori.u„; on Lot 6 of Tract 12206, .in the vicinity of Moody Circle. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beaan coes ordain as follows : SEC:'iC'q 1 . Repeal Grainance 2369 enact ea oy Ci-ty Council --n uctooer 6, 1966 . PASSED AND ADOPTED DY the City Council of the Ci *y of unt i.nc,ton beacn at a regular meeting tnereof neia on *.r,e ca.- of , 19b6. Mayor ATTLST: APPkOV AS %_0 EURM A'000 r-v f City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: NITIATED AND APPROVED: Cxty A mxn strator 1 xrector o Development Services lft� _ 1721E 11—I3-86 " A 2- REQUEST OPOR CITY COUNCIL ATION Date October 6, 1986 AbmitW to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator '�w , • Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services so Subject: EXTENSION OF URGENCY MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PE ITS - ORDINANCE NO. 2869 Consistent with Council Policy? ( ] yes ( J New Policy or Exception V��•DI�D' 69 Statement of Ime, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attgchments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: on August 18 , 1986, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 establishing a forty-five ( 45 ) day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (lot at sautherly end of Moody Circle) . This 45-day moratorium expires October 2, 1986. The California Government Code allows building moratoriums to be extended for a period of 10 months and 15 days after the initial 45-day period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council not extend the urgency moratorium on building permits for Lot 6 of Tract 12206. ANALYSIS: Adoption of the urgency building moratorium on the lot (Lot 6) at the southern end of Moody Circle was to preclude development so that it could be reviewed to determine if and how Moody Circle might be integrated with conceptual street layouts for the vicinity and future development of Meadowlark Airport. Prior to discussing optional layouts, though, a brief history of easements and of Moody Circle is necessary. In 1919, Tract 86 was recorded which established 50 foot wide easements for the benefit of access to several 5 acre parcels (see attached Map #1 ) throughout the Meadowlark Airport area and vicinity. As far as we know, these easements still exist. Pearce Drive was one of those easements which has evolved logically into a central access point to Bolsa Chica for development in the area . In 1972, Tract 7805 for 20 single family residential lots was developed on one of those 5 acre parcels (see Map #2) on the north side of Pearce Drive. Tract 9275 for 50 single family residential lots was subsequently developed in 1976, also on the northside of Pearce Drive. Both subdivisions contained lots fronting Pearce Drive. Z_ •P10 4/64 t The City Council approved Tentative Tract 12206 (see map no. 2) and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 (which had been appealed by a neighbor from the Planning Commission approval ) based on recommendations from staff and the Planning Commission in 1984. Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) was an eleven (11 ) lot subdivision for development of aprtment units on the south side of Pearce Drive. At that time, the City Council reviewed two street layouts, one with Moody Circle accessing Bolsa Chica and the other connecting Moody Circle to Pearce Drive. Public Works Department, Development Services Department and the Planning Commission recommended the access to Pearce Drive alternative in order to minimize ingress and egress onto Bolsa Chica . Several people spoke at the City Council meeting. Comments in favor of Pearce Drive were: o Most desirable layout from a public safety standpoint o Pearce Drive is not used as frequently as Bolsa Chica o A T-intersection onto Bolsa Chica would cause greater traffic hazards and conflicts on Bolsa Chica o Awkward access to the site from southbound traffic would be created with the Bolsa Chica access alterative o Cross traffic movement would be necessary into and out of the Bolsa Chica access alternative o Local street access on west side of Bolsa Chica in similar fashion. Comments against Pearce Drive access and for Bolsa Chica access included: o Negative impact of headlight glare to two homes on the north side of Pearce Drive at T-intersection. o Traffic hazards created to children on Pearce Drive o Increase noise on Pearce Drive o Potential parking problem on Pearce Drive from insufficient parking on-site and on-street for apartment projects. o Maximum R2 density allowed is proposed which increases traffic and noise o Pearce Drive is the only access to the subdivision and should be limited in use. o Street access to apartments and single family .residences should be separated to reduce conflicts. RCA - 10/6/86S -2- (6320d) un August 6 , 1986; the Planning Commission denied Tentative Tract 12756 (Broberg) and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 (see map no. 2 ) , an 8-lot subdivision for an apartment development on the east side of Bolsa Chica directly south of Tract 12206 (Moody) . An appeal has been filed on the denial . The project is pending before the City Council . A zone change to change the property (Broberg) to commercial has also been filed and is pending before the Planning Commission. A general plan amendment and zone change has been filed for a change of land uses on the Meadowlark Airport property. This project is tentatively scheduled before the Planning Commission in February 1987 . Based on the proposed land uses , a conceptual precise plan of street alignment (Map #3 ) has been prepared by a traffic consultant analyzing the site. This layout has been preliminarily accepted by Public Works . Access is shown through the site from Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue with a branch to Pearce Drive . Any access to Bolsa Chica other than through Pearce Drive is not recommended by the Traffic Division because of the impact upon Bolsa Chica and that Pearce Drive will some day be signalized . Two suggested alternatives were submitted by the Pearce Drive neighborhood group (Map #4 and #5 ) . On September 24, 1986 , Development Services and Public Works Department staff met with three individuals from the neighborhood , one Planning Commissioner , Mr . Moody and a representative for Mr . Broberg to discuss the moratorium and alternatives to reduce or eliminate the concerns of the neighbors . Four options were suggested; 1 ) Have a traffic study by an independent traffic consultant to analyze the circulation and traffic situation and make recommendations to mitigate the traffic concerns ( i .e. striping, stop signs , rerouting of Moody Circle ) . 2 ) Establish an assessment district to purchase property from Mr . Moody and Mr . Broberg for Moody Circle southerly extension to Bolsa Chica and northerly closure at Pearce Drive . 3 ) Neighbors would agree to support zone change of Broberg property to commercial if Moody Circle is rerouted. 4 ) The City will attempt to minimize traffic flow to Pearce Drive from future Meadowlark Airport development by street design and traffic devices . RCA - 10/6/86 -3- ji (6320d ) The Traff•�c Division maintains their position that Pearce Drive should serve as the main access point and that establishing multiple intersections along a six-lane major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicles on the public roads under these conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The extension of the moratorium is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Extend the moratorium for 10 months and 15 days and direct staff to engage an independent traffic consultant to prepare a circulation and traffic study of the Moody Circle, Pearce Drive, B ,lsa Chica and potential Meadowlark Airport development area and make a recommendation for improvements. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Draft Ordinance No. 2669 for extension 2. Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 (to be submitted ) 3 . Map 1 - 1919 Easements 4. Map 2 - Subdivisions 5. Map 3 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout prepard by Traffic Consultant 6. Map 4 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout A - prepared by neighbors 7. Map 5 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout B - prepared by neighbors 8 . Minutes from November 19, 1984 City Council meeting pertaining to Tentative Tract 12206 and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 9. Planning Commission staff report dated August 5, 1986 of Tentative Tract 12756 and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 JWP :SH:kla i 77 RCA - 10/6/86 -4- (6320d) ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 122061 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on August 18, 1986, enacted a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206, in the vicinity of Moody Circle, and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to establish and extend a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for new construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 , in the vicinity of Moody Circle, as more particularly described on a map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, and At the present time the city is studying the precise plan of street alignment including said property, and The city needs time to consider , draft, and present a precise plan of street alignment for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council within such interim moratorium period and to consider , draft , and present ordinances to govern develop- ment of said property, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 . A moratorium is hereby established upon and extended the issuance of building permits for new construction on said property. The duration of the moratorium shall extend for ten months and fifteen days after adoption of this ordinance. 1. OA9 SECTION 2 . The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, and that the approval of building permits on other applicable entitlements for new construction would result in a threat to public health, safety, or welfare, in that the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services is presently conducting a comprehensive study of the existing land uses in the area. The City Council recognizes that it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to study, hold hearings, and consider proposals for a new precise plan of street alignment and new development regulations prior to consideration by council . It would be destructive of the precise plan of street alignment and development regulations if, during the period they are being considered and studied and are the subject of public hearings , development occurs which might defeat the whole or any part of the ultimate objective . of such precise plan of street alignment or development regulations. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause si:me to be published within fifteen ( 15 ) days of its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1986 Mayor 2 . ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City clerk City Attorney REVIE D AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: Ci y ni _r for irector of D el pment Services 3 . HO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH White City Attorney REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Canary CCity Clark ity Administrator Goldenrod Departmental HUNTINGTON BEACH DS 86-129 Date Request Made By Department >% James W. ?alin, Director Dev`�lopiuent Services11, 13/36 INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Attorney's Office as soon as possible. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney.Out- line briefly reasons for the request.Attach all information and exhibits pertinent to the subject. Type of Legal Service Requested: PK Ordinance ( ] Insurance [ l Other [ 1 Resolution [ ] Bonds ( ] Contract/Agreement ( I Opinion All exhibits must be attached,or this request will be returned to you. ( ] Exhibits Attached ilaase prepare an Ordinance tha effec�-ivaly re,:)aals JZdinanca ado. 2369 (Building :aoratori,a on A000dy Circle ascablisiia-1 for 13 moachs and 15 days) for inclusion with RCA slaved for the i4ove.a:)e 17, 1936 Ci --y Council Meting. Thi3 ordinanca is nacessazy and needed ay noon "oday. Thank you. J-r7p::,;i:j r i f , I I If for Council Action, If not for Council action,desired completion date Sighature: Agenda deadline `�y Council meeting 11/17/ ._�J BY L100A 11/13/3�i i ,7 i PIO 12/79 s s URC ORDINANCE NO. 2869 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON ' BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 , IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on August 18, 1986, enacted a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 , in the vicinity of Moody Circle, and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to establish and extend a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for new construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206, in the vicinity of Moody Circle, as more particularly described on a map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, and At the present time the city is studying the precise plan of street alignment including said property, and The city needs time to consider , draft, and present a precise plan of street alignment for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council within such interim moratorium period and to consider , draft, and present ordinances to govern develop- ment of said property, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . A moratorium is hereby established upon and extended the issuance of building permits for new construction on said property. The duration of the moratorium shall extend for ten months and fifteen days after adoption of this ordinance. 1 . SECTION 2 . The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, and that the approval of building permits on other applicable entitlements for new construction would result in a threat to public health, safety, or welfare, in that the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services is presently conducting a comprehensive study of the existing land uses in the area. The City Council recognizes that it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to study, hold hearings , and consider proposals for a new precise plan of street alignment and new development regulations prior to consideration by council . It would be destructive of the precise plan of street alignment and development regulations if , during the period they are being considered and studied and are the subject of public hearings , development occurs which might defeat the whole or any part of the ultimate objective of such precise plan of street alignment or development regulations . SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption . The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published within fifteen ( 15 ) days of its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of October , 1986 Mayor 2 . 933-81-001 EMOi�son Robert F 4892 Pearce Ave Huntington aeach Ca. 9264-9 o► .o 911 oh ro U V O v1 v I+N v � r4 U u. O 1 O H 0 u 1 v v DO N R P. � C 1 V-1 0% .1 Ch °i x 933-81-003 Nielsen Terry 4296 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Cdd 0 wl/ Z 0 G 0 v r � C x v o � C V 933-81-002 f Herbold Albert B Tr 16125 Tortola Cir • I Huntington Beach, Ca. 9=549 y P4RCSity of Hunti xn Beach 933-81-024 Thurman Debra R Thurman, Ralph S 3621 nada Sombre ra, Ca. 90631 C' - rJ a� N U U u Y Vf Y x W Y O O 14 O O a a u I .rJ Y tW •� ca a a Go H VO C Cq a � 933-81-025 Dalsimer Christopher T 4992 Pearce St Fiuntinoton Beach, Ca. 92649 n - V N = cd Ch MGJ q - 0 4-J V x F x m aj V o i - - o, 0�-007 So71 �EAILE OR i NUNTINCTOti BEACH, CA 1t«f z P . :JMj@ city of Huntirgon Beach P.O.BOX 190 CAUFORNIA 92648 933-81413 Valvov Pate H Falpakoff, Karen E 4946 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 w t � _ N P h IJ � 0 1, >oW < ,o cam uz •C,o ■1<t- O W a z..►'".. 933-81-014 M N Z s 0= Say Margaret J 16542 Pueblo Cir Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 M O M O N 1 1 t ♦O c. t A V Cd N � OI z Z O J a.+ v B 4A C .933-81-ow O of Corley Looert F 4912 Pearce St Huctiugtoa Beach, Ca. 92"9 o Y� . - - - ,- tu t.,iry or -tiu ington eac P.O.BOX 190 IFORNIA 92648 • s X icey.. A 46—t33-47 MARSHOTT• FRANK N 04-007 6731 WESTMINSTER AVE SUITE 4 WESTMINSTER, CA 9t663 ich « 12648 J H t IY O 1-0 146-233-48 OBRADOVICH/ MICHAEL L °C~' 04-007 5031 PEARCE OR i u z HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 � 0 .. M M M H O= t O � Z f S e • 11 1 A rl O O O • 1 1 •O C Beach z RNIA 926U O -� dq � C C w 144-t33-46 SPRINGER* WAYNE K O 04-007 5041 PEARCE OR NUNTINGTON K ACNo CA 9t649 a �A i - `�, a�-�•s :1. pity o untigto oPLO n =�. P.O.BOX 190 LIFORNIA 92648 146-691-21 MORTON, IRENE H 44-007 t4661 SUBURBIA LH HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92644 e w ' J o< • < oc =Jrl O 2 -OM O = M O!— O t•1 N M W Zs= N 146-401-35 HSU, ROBERT T H o e 04-007 475 PROSPECT PL iO COSTA MESA, CA 926t6 f O O � w - sV V cd 04 0� � z - tvp • C g .... v A x w o o a d t-641•E3 LAM. .BAN P4 •4T 14911 ROOSEVELT sT MNMTIIKT" MACH. CA 9t64! t f ;_ �1 •` _ g y _ a /. * City of Huntington Beach P.O.Box 190 >�o� _. CALIFORNIA 92648 �o n 144-401-Ot MOODY, JANET T O ,.., •4-0�7 46*1 LOS PATOS to HUNTINGTON BEACNP CA 91449 `C ' K O � of x � ich o►� P%,.,. C .0� 26a8 2 bz a � N � r i Co W. • 144-401-17 GRAGE-NILLSON o e' 04-047 2062 BUSINESS CENTER OR o" SUITE 105 �0, IRVINE. CA 9t71f ' R - pr7[ 7o�C sot n"o�w > �fl -h "w +mac Z as i48 r 0 E w s 144-4i1-Bl BROWZRB• JACK } 94-907 M II EUCALYPTUS EL TORO• CA 92410 � f P . r 14A-401-t0 YUI-N�'. —RICMARO V 'r 04-007 2200 PARK NEWPORT 9401 P NEWPORT BEACH, CAL �t«0 u S u m< O W v 0 2S ►+u 2 L OC O t►- O W t! <IL - L rl F- �+S I Y O O N 1 1► /� M O M1 O 1 N � 1 + �O O H cd N 14A-•01-34 M A T PROPERTIES u a 04-007 3462 KATELLA AVE LOS ALAMITOS, CA 107=• C.4 U. O 4q O a-J C x w O O of 0 933-81-009 V a Felty Grace 4919 Pearce Ave flvatia=toa leach, Ca. 92649 t a* y44 �z i• .�!! City of Hunti ton Beach i — _P.O.BOX 190 .,_._ 146.601-85 OOUNING► RALPN 04-097 1647 E ALMONO AVE i0 U669 ORANGE. CA 0 p i � W << u < f �W =FAO W=� zh )r W< 1 u u u obi �n N O M M .q< �O= p N< =r1= M 1 P �O O O d 1 ' 933-81-008 . .o O CbapmaP Ronald P 8192 Prestwick Cir V Huntington Beach Ca. 721646 Cd N u PQM Q Z ----- ----- _ o �r p i.+ x O x m -- a� _. ^' O 166-601-tt QYIATT• JUL P V d 04-097 4419 NERMANSON CIR i NUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92609 i iA � t _ ( a z �, - 'J, City of Hunti on Beach 14&-6d1-10 TOROSIAH• ARTHUR 04-007 5081 CRESENT OR 9t707 SANTA ANA, CA at s _ t� vh a U U .. w an ry r on V4 N O O O 10 Si 94 H sk � .o in uin `en Ch 933-82-010 vt s Pruden Clarence A Jr 4936 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 i -Z " V N cd o, F+-1 Z 0 4--+^ t� i-+ x o O as x -j 933-81-011 Garcia Eduardo T 5462 Bankton Dr •1 =n Huntington Beach. Ca. 9 264 9 . -• .A' -y - - #.-fir'"- e,.,/- -�'`' IiFl a, •-'' .`: 9�.y„ r y. - 833-81-016 Huang Gloria W s 4440 Ironwood Ave Seal Beach, Ca. 90740 N v ----- M U b � a � ' a 0 � awa W �o ti 933-81-017 Cooke Robert Frances . 88 Seton Rd Irvine, Ca. 92715 V N r. 04 (�Qj Z 0 O J �A Q _ - C - � T x o O x a.+ . 6 V 933-81-018 Ellis.Kathleen D 4968 Pearc* Avs Huntingum leach, Ca. 92649 •4 - n A-A _} � x r:> w 4 T$44-e'': -y+-Y.4 933-81-020 Viscetto Emilie 4976 Pearce St o, Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 v ro v u N •� A _ v in Y N 00 01 Y o w r+ ++ a c ao Y M I " w 411 Cn a 0 0 a w 933-91-021 Miller- Howard H 4978 Pearce Ave Hu:tington Beach, Ca. 92649 v cd Q, a� a �4 z w - — ---- - O c taA C r x o O V d 933-81-005 Mama Allen 4906 Pearce Ave Huntintton Beach, Ca. 92549 s a f i 144-601-18 BROWNING, NARA J 04-007 16771 ROOSEVELT ST HUNTINGTON BEACH• CA !!64! O► . v �D - � N O� b � a A U •a � v N N cc N i w 0 to ac o14 14 a, 4 as �46-601-15 SM4ROOP• SATINOER 04-007 S RUE CHATEAU ROYAL NEWPORT BEACH• CA 9E660 V N ct I " O a � r O x 933-81-022 V d Stanton Ricbard E 4982 PrArCe St Buutingtou nescb. Ca• 92669 � I MF vosr ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIE D AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: 1 Ci y ni r for irector of D-ZMel8pment Services I I 3. Emergency Ord. No. 2869 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntinc.jtcn Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was read to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of October 19 86 , and was passed and adopted by at least four-fifths (4/5) affirmative votes of said City Council. AYES: Councilmen: MarAllictar, Finlpy, Mandic- Bailey. Green NOES: Councilmen: Thnmac ABSENT: Councilmen: Ke11y out of the room City Clerk and ex-officic Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California d� _g( CouYiC-c 1 vw 14&A In L!k V-I V--j V 6v► Moa��jr C� cG� t -owa REQUEST TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CC: Mayor Robert Mandic, Jr. Chairman Tom Livengood Mayor Pro Tem Ruth Finley Co—Chairman Kent Pearce Jack Kelly Marcus Porter Don MacAllister Grace Winchell . Ruth Bailey Richard Rowe Peter Green Frank Mirhahangir John Thomas John Erskine RE: 1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-26 (BROBERG) 2. CONTINUED ITEM — BROBERG VARIANCE 3. MORATORIUM AND STREET ALIGNMENT — MOODY CIRCLE These items have been pending for several. weeks. City Development Services, neighbors and developers Moody and Broberg have met for the first time and for 2 112 hours discussed various options. The main concern of the neighborhood is to get Moody Circle closed off at Pearce Drive and to have Moody Circle exit Bolsa Chica. via the Broberg property. We feel the following suggestions would be required to satisfy all parties concerned. All agreements must happen at the same time. REQUIRED OF DEVELOPERS 1. Moody to deed over Lot 6 to City of Huntington Beach for the intended use of street alignment with Bolsa Chica as Exit for Moody Circle. a. Moody to comply with all existing laws of the City and State of California. 2. North End of Moody Circle to be blocked off by block wall and fire gate similar to Saybrook and Edinger Streets. a. Fire wall and gate to comply with all existing laws, plans and specifications required and approved by City of Huntington Beach. 3. Broberg property to furnish portions of land required to Exit Bolsa Chica according to city and state specifications. REQUEST TO PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL Page Two REQUIRED ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL 1. Vote for proposed settlement between neighborhood, developers and City Development Services. 2. Vote for Zone change of all property zoned R-2 to be rezoned to R-3 located at East of Bolsa Chica, South of Pearce Drive and West of Airport. a. This is the only advantage the city can give these Developers in order to have the Developers contribute land for free to the City. 3. Require all improvements to comply with all existing City and State laws regarding subdivisions and building permits. We feel your cooperation is necessary and feel this is a fair way for the city to get free title to land. In addition, this plan requires no cash or cost of resources from the city of Huntington Beach. We feel that the overall safety of the community will be enhanced and finally conclude these items already before the City Council on a later schedule. This plan as presented enjoys the support from the neighborhood and if executed properly will enjoy our continued support. Dated: October 1, 1986 Sincerely, Michael L. Obradovich MLO/vya i huntington beach development services department • STAf f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 5, 1986 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44/TENTATIVE TRACT #12756 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 15 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT/ Jack Broberg DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 16771 Moody Circle June 16, 1986 Huntington Beach, CA MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: To permit a reduction August 5, 1986 in lot width for two lots within a proposed eight- EXISTING ZONING: (Q)R2 lot subdivision LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa GENERAL PLAN: Medium Chica Density Residential ACREAGE: 2 gross acres EXISTING USE: Contractor 's yard and single family The Planning Commission on July 15, 1986, reviewed seven alternative street layouts with the proposed tentative tract. With a straw vote, Alternative #2 (applicant 's revised request ) , Alternative #3 (Connection to Moody Circle with landscaping barricade at Pearce ) , and Alternative #6 (same as Alternative #3 but includes extension to the east for future access ) were retained. The Planning Commission directed staff to further analyze these three alternatives in terms of current and future traffic circulation (based on proposed land uses at Meadowlark Airport) . A meeting was held on July 22, 1986, with staff, City Engineer , two Commissioners (Erskine and Livengood) , Jack Broberg, Robert Skinner, Ken Moody and the Fire Department to discuss the feasibility of the three concepts. Concerns regarding the design of the proposed structures on the new tract were discussed. Mr . Broberg indicated an award winning architect has been contacted to prepare a conceptual layout which will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. The buildings will not be related to those on Moody Circle and will be designed with sensitivity towards the single family homes to the east and commercial development to the south. • A-F M-23A M M i The City Engineer discussed possible circulation systems for Meadowlark airport and whether access to Bolsa Chica was necessary. • He indicated that whichever circulation system is proposed, secondary access from Meadowlark to Bolsa Chica would be necessary. Primary choice for the accessway is Pearce Street. Pearce Street is the midway point along Bolsa Chica between Warner and was intended as a collector street. In addition, this intersection is the most logical location for a signalized intersection. This would improve the traffic situation at Pearce and Bolsa Chica and help to regulate traffic. Re-routing Moody Circle and/or providing access to Bolsa Chica from Meadowlark via "A" Street (Alternative #3 and #6 ) would increase the level of traffic at "A" Street and Bolsa Chica which is highly undesirable. The effect of the "T" intersection on Bolsa Chica with additional traffic creates high potential for driver error due to several traffic conditions to consider when making movements along Bolsa Chica through the two intersections ( "A" Street and Pearce Street) . Limiting "A" Street to a short cul-de-sac street with eight lots minimizes the load of traffic onto Bolsa Chica at that intersection. Regarding Alternatives #3 and #6, the applicant stated that the project would not be feasible if he had to acquire lot #6 of Tract #12206; and the owner of lot #6 indicated he is unwilling to sell lot #6 for street purposes. Thus, if the City required the re-routing of Moody Circle as a condition of approval and the applicant is unsuccessful in acquiring the lot, the City must then • be prepared to initiate condemnation proceedings to obtain lot #6 at fair market value and to make street improvements. A conceptual land use plan for Meadowlark Airport was submitted by a traffic consultant representing the airport property owner indicating possible internal circulation and the traffic impacts upon neighboring streets . Access would be provided to Warner Avenue and Heil as well as a connection to Pearce Street. Secondary access to Bolsa Chica from any development on Meadowlark would be necessary and should be at Pearce Street. In order to monitor future development of the lots within the roposed subdivision, a conditional use permit is recommended. The plicant can submit one conditional use permit for developing the ots collectively, or if the lots are sold individually, one conditional use permit per lot must be submitted. This would enable _ the Commission to review the overall building design, floor layout, landscaping, buffering techniques, perimeter walls, and such details as the number of mailboxes and electric meters per building. The following is a recap of the three alternatives: Alternative #2 (applicant ' s revised request ) : This layout shows eight lots off a short cul-de-sac. The lots are rectangular in shape which eliminates the need for a variance for • Staff Report - 8/5/86 -2- Q ( 5802d ) P reduced lot width and frontage . Access to Bolsa Chica would be • limited to right turns into and out of "A" Street. Moody Circle would remain unchanged. Alternative #3: This concept entails a connection between the proposed "A" Street cul-de-sac and existing Moody Circle to the north. A connection could be made by acquiring lot #6 of Tract 12206 and extending Moody Circle southerly to an L-shaped "A" Street within the proposed subdivision. The new subdivision would have eight lots and 28 apartment units, a reduction of two units. Lot #6 is currently vacant and conversion to a street would result in a loss of one lot and three units from the northerly tract . At the north end of Moody Circle, an emergency gate and landscaping could be provided. The driveways on the two northerly developments could serve as turnaround areas . Additional on-street parking would be created between lots #5 and #6 of Tract 12206. Alternative #6 : This alternative combines access from Bolsa Chica to Moody Circle and from Bolsa Chica to parcels east of the subject property and future Meadowlark Airport development. Acquisition of lot #6 of Tract 12206 for the Moody Circle extension and an easterly extension of "A" Street to the easterly property line would be necessary. • Staff Recommendation: Based on the Traffic Division 's comments and analysis, and the fact that the adjacent property owner is resistant to release Lot #6 for a street, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and approve Tentative Tract 12756 with the revised layout as shown on Alternative #2 based on the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44: 1 . Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The parcel can be divided into parcels that conform to minimum lot width. 2. Since the subject property can be divided into regular established standards such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same • zone classifications. i Staff Report - 8/5/86 -3- ( 5802d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 : • 1 . The proposed subdivision of this two-gross acre parcel of land zoned (Q)R2, Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 15.0 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. 4. The proposed "A" Street with eight lots will geneate a minimal amount of traffic onto Bolsa Chica and poses no significant safety impact on traffic at Pearce. Any additional lots off the cul-de-sac and/or an extension of "A" Street easterly towards Meadowlark Airport increases the traffic load on "A" Street creating a negative traffic impact on Bolsa Chica. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . Tentative Tract 12756 dated May 20, 1986, shall be revised to conform with Alternative 820 . 2. An 8" water main on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street shall • be constructed to connect to the existing system. 3. Sewer, water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works standards . The sewer main shall be an 8" diameter pipe . 4. A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the tentative map indicating the required dedication and improvements. 5 . The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to Public Works standards. 6. Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at "A" Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from the project site are prohibited. 8. Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited. 9 . Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach are required at the corners of "A" Street and Bolsa Chica Street and along Bolsa Chica. The irrigation/power lines shall be dedicated to the City from Tract No. 12206 and the proposed tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain the • landscape pockets and irrigation/power system. �� Staff Report - 8/5/86 -4- ( 5802d ) 10 . A fire hydrant shall be provided in the cul-de-sac and another • hydrant on Bolsa Chica spaced approximately 300 feet from the existing hydrant per Fire Department standards. 11 . Fire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet and located within 150 feet from all portions of the building perimeter. 12. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 3,500 gallons per minute. 13 . A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public right-of-way on Bolsa Chica Street and designed to match the existing northerly wall along Bolsa Chica. 14. Street lights, signing, and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parkin posted on one side of the new street . 15. All building setbacks shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk . 16. All streets, sidewalk , lighting, walls and landscaping conditioned with this applicaton shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City departments. 17. All required parking spaces shall be provided on each parcel . • 18 . Common driveway easements shall be required when the parcels are developed to reduce the number of curb cuts on the new street . 19. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a conditional use permit shall be required for a master plan of development showing all site plans, floor plans, parking and elevations in compliance with the zoning code and the conditions stated herein. 11 .0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may also deny Tentative Tract based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756: 1 . Approval of the subdivision would preclude access from Bolsa Chica to adjoining easterly underdeveloped parcels necessitating future development to obtain access from Roosevelt Lane. 2. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development on 8 individual lots. • Staff Report - 8/5/86 -5- ( 5802d) so ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Alternatives 2, 3 and 6 • 2. Conceptual Land Use Plan for Meadowlark Airport 3. Staff Report dated July 15, 1986 JWP:SH:pb • i I • i I ,/� Staff Report - 8/5/86 -6- ( 5802d) 178-26 17& • a o, BOL SA CH/CA s TREE T Y. , Igo Y• l.a• l+1'Io' • nn •. '1 \ (W ��{ IN W �• y� + `'J � .� �®. �J hI \�) 1, 1'' �' .. •Qi i M® • ^ M ( L 1 (A 2. . • O V i Ito' i�t• ,� _ \w b A4&[r CRaf4 MOOpy ca. 6m) � 1 rt� 61 $t x ` 0 Q � •u(� •� '� try 0 ® p, N ROOSEVEL7 S/' :, .r..► ,Ll' s. • �. • �.. n �n t soas[vur uv[t doo,. 1 y � U `© 0 � I ©: p . 1. O �J \ 3 ►1' F ' 178 l• _ sTRrrr "BOLSA CH/CA ' • O M • ty. 1• UI • . 1 Mr lit .t•• � 111 p 41 rl+ ■ y, • is r°y'/t�" ins' 1. '• a�4 1 � � _ (l/� v , . � ' i `_ ; • .,.:.- V) live W ,'© � r, ;�trl !,�.�r,. j,'' }'•j '•�; O ~ :..i!� I: • ply e r!'� .�i...■..r70.Je'� u ii(U ti :` ;; /`Jo 1� ly' •. I 111• .i s' ® �� l �' V?► } ? i'�' 1. ie' 1 a}'1 �_.._fV /.♦.t• ��1I •, �I +, 116 /�1 -gym 1 iMll elm f /r�' u N �• n A t C 1 _ �,:c ♦,' RooSEVEtr S/ in OD `i { � � .._.._...... ...._._ _...__....... \.�-._.......... i� © , ice✓ ,Id` •- � tow INA APIA � L 1-18•26 17i . tit a` 4 o BOLSA CHICA STREET } LL fee QDD or '?�/ ids:..��_ '� �_" a L 1 � � .» ��t�lr tMati �•i?� 1 y E MAY CA• N , u 4 OPP-Ad of Oka is It AD . , ? ' •i,Y ' h�-- CID, :; M , l=, ' ' ®. 40 ' /��' a y .� (C1►� tip. at' •s ti" ® U ® ® Q cl LI Roosewu ,,. •w.w�+�r.+ 2S ;r^ f]I to M ��J I ~ i t/ V • r tf `I CID OD [lilt ce) co i y r 4 1 (�� - is SHeil Ave. 1�1.6 ri.andogml s ■ ■ 19 ■ N m o ea 648 ■ ■ 4.4 ■ ■ 5 TA OK cm ■ t� T RESIDENTIAL _ J L cot. ,� W ■ S . L F1 1.2 N f T y ■ a .2 o to //■ T 19 SENIOR ■ CITIZEN r A) ■ ►MEADOW CR 3.2 ■ ■ ■ COMMERCIAL: i MA ■) ,.4 4.8 Warner Ave. 6.6 6.4 XX IN THOUSANDS T = TRANSITION AREA - OPEN SPACE/LOW DENSITY MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE RESIDENTIAL 0.01= CONCEPTUAL ROAD* CONCEPTUAL ROADWAYS AND ALIGNMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR PROPOSED PROJECT (XX) .TRIPS GENERATED BY USE AFF huntington beach development services department sir • ..._.REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: July 15, 1986 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44/TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 1, 1986) APPLICANT/ Jack Broberg DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 16771 Moody Circle June 23, 1986 Huntington Beach, CA MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: To permit a reduction August 22, 1986 in lot width for two lots within a proposed eight- EXISTING ZONING: (Q)R2 lot subdivision LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa GENERAL PLAN: Medium Chica Density Residential • ACREAGE: 2 gross acres EXISTING USE: Contractor ' s yard and single family On July 1, 1986, the Planning Commission continued Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and Tentative Tract 12756 and directed staff to explore alternative street layouts connecting the proposed cul-de-sac street with Moody Circle to the north and/or extending the cul-de-sac street easterly for access to future development on adjacent easterly parcels. During .staff ' s analysis, several layouts were submitted by the applicant, the Traffic Division, Planning Commissioners, and the neighborhood group. Each one has its merits and some were only slight modifications to others. Categorization of these alternatives into three basic concepts are presented below with a discussion following each. Applicant' s Request (Exhibits 01" and "2" ) : This configuration is still requested by the applicant (see attached letter) and is most desirable by the Traffic Division (see attached) . An alternative to this layout is shown as Exhibit "2" which shows eight lots yielding 28 apartment units instead of 30. Basically it is the same configuration as Exhibit "1" but includes a longer cul-de-sac. The lots are rectangular in shape which • eliminates the need for a variance for reduced lot width and frontage. Access to the adjacent easterly lots would be from • Roosevelt Street, either to the north at Pearce or the south at Warner, when developed. However, modification to the cul-de-sac bulb could be made for future easterly access to Roosevelt Street. Alternative "A" (Exhibits "3" and "4" ) : These two concepts entail a connection between the proposed '"A" Street cul-de-sac and existing Moody Circle to the north. As shown on Exhibit "3", a connection could be made by acquiring lot #6 of Tract 12206 and extending Moody Circle southerly to an L-shaped "A" Street within the proposed subdivision. The new subdivision would have eight lots and 28 apartment units, a reduction of two units. Lot #6 is currently vacant and conversion to a street would result in a loss of one lot and three units from the northerly tract. At the north end of Moody Circle, an emergency gate and landscaping could be provided (Exhibit "3" ) . The driveways on the two northerly developments could serve as turnaround areas. Additional on-street parking would be created between Lots 5 and 6 of Tract 12206. One suggestion received for compensation for the lot loss in Tract 12206 would be to create another lot at the north end for units ( Exhibit "4" ) . However, due to the width of Pearce Street and the driveway locations serving the two northerly apartments, the size of the lot would be limited to approximately 3,000 square feet (only 1 unit could be built ) . • Alternative "B" (Exhibits "5" , "6" , and "7" ) : This alternative combines access from Bolsa Chica to Moody Circle and from Bolsa Chica to parcels east of the subject property. There are several ways to achieve this, each based on different east-west "A" Street alignments. Acquisition of Lot #6 of Tract 12206 for the Moody Circle extension and an easterly extension of "A" Street to the easterly property line would be necessary. Each exhibit varies with number of lots and overall unit count. Exhibit "5" , which was submitted by the homeowners on Pearce Drive, contains 7 lots for 24 units with a four-way intersection. One of the lots would be used as open space and/or guest parking . Also recommended is modification to the traffic island on Bolsa Chica to allow left turns onto and out of "A" Street. Exhibit "6" shows 6 lots for 25 apartment units. Exhibit "7" has 6 large lots with 24 apartment units which would create additional open space area for landscaping . However, it would require revising the parking layout of the adjoining southerly commercial development and would eliminate parking spaces. Traffic Analysis : The Traffic Division has been informed of the alternatives. Their • comments are attached. Staff Report - 7/15/86 -2- ( 5628d ) -Staff Recommendation: Based on the Traffic Division' s comments and analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and approve Tentative Tract 12756 with the revised layout as shown on Exhibit "2" based on the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44: 1 . Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The parcel can be divided into parcels that conform to minimum lot width. 2. Since the subject property can be divided into regular established standards such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. • FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 : 1 . The proposed subdivision of this two--gross acre parcel of land zoned (Q)R2, Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 15.0 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing . The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . Tentative Tract 12756 dated May 20, 1986, shall be revised to conform with Exhibit "2" . 2. An 8" water main on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street shall be constructed to connect to the existing system. 3. Sewer, water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works standards. The sewer main shall be an 8" diameter pipe. Staff Report - 7/15/86 -3- (5628d ) 4. A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the • tentative map indicating the required dedication and improvements. 5. The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to Public Works standards. 6. Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at "A" Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 7. Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from the project site are prohibited. 8. Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited. 9. Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach are required at the corners of "A" Street and Bolsa Chica Street . The irrigation/power lines shall be dedicated to the City from Tract No. 12206 and the proposed tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain the landscape pockets and irrigation/power system. 10. A fire hydrant shall be provided in the cul-de-sac and another hydrant on Bolsa Chica spaced approximately 300 feet from the existing hydrant per Fire Department standards. 11 . Fire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet and located • within 150 feet from all portions of the building perimeter. 12. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 3,500 gallons per minute. 13. A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public right-of-way on Bolsa Chica Street and designed to match the existing northerly wall along Bolsa Chica. i 14. Street lights, signing , and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parking posted on one side of the new street. 15. All building setbacks shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk. 16. All streets, sidewalk, lighting , walls and landscaping conditioned with this applicaton shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City departments. 17. All required parking spaces shall be provided on each parcel. I 18. Common driveway easements shall be required when the parcels are developed to reduce the number of curb cuts on the new street. • &Staff Report - 7/15/86 -4- ( 5628d ) rr� Page 5 •- !:�c:uncil ;vi1-iutti ! - $'16j86 ORDINANCE NO 2861 ON APPROVED - OIL WEEL FENCING SI'ANOARDB The Deputy City Cl presented Ordinance No. 2861 far Council consideration - "AN 0RDINANC E OF OF HLWrINGrM i AMENDING THE H[NPINC�1Cl�i BLUE MiNICIPAL CC�E BY ING SOC.TICI+�S 15.20.150, 15.20.160, 15.20.170 ADID 15.20.180 TO IRWFLEC.r STANDARDS." Followir� discussion, a mo was made by MacAllister, seconded by Mandic, to approve introduction of Or No. 2961, after reading by title, by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Finley, c, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: Kelly 45-W MDRATORIUM APPROVED P amhlb PADS - PEUCE/BQ SA CHICA TO ALUM TIM TO Sr= PPSA Discussion was held between staff and Council regarding citizens' nd Planning Commission's request for a moratorium on Moody Circle located near Pearce Ave- nue and Bolsa Chica Street. The Director of Development Services reviewed the 'History of the project. The City Attorney referred to her memo to the Chair- man of the Planning Commission dated August 14, 1986 suggesting that Council adopt a Government Code S. 65858 moratorium for study of a specific plan of street alignment. She referred to a memo from the Department Services Depart- ment to the Planning Commission dated August 7, 1986 indicating that there was no evidence of zoning violations presently existing in the apartment buildings located on Moody Circle. The Director of Development Services stated that the first moratorium would be for forty-five days. In answer to questions by Mayor Mandic, the Director of Development Services stated that Lot 6 and Moody Circle at the very southerly end are the only lots on which there have been no building permit or plans filed. The Director of Development Services agreed that the moratorium would not stop a building permit that has been issued, and the developer can still build on those building permits; therefore, the proposed moratorium would stop develop- ment on the two previously mentioned pieces of property. A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Bailey, to place a 45-day moratorium on issuance of building permits on those two pieces of land actually on Moody Circle, or any further building permits on Moody Circle, pending a study of a Precise Plan of Street Alignment pursuant to Government Code S. 65858. Councilman Thomas questioned whether this action would cover the whole area that is involved there, not just the one piece of property. Mayor Mandic stated that a tentative tract map of property located in the other area of concern was scheduled for Council action in the future, there- fore nothing can happen on the property until Council takes action on the tract map. He pointed out there was sufficient control on the property at this time, so there was no need for a moratorium on that additional piece of property. Page 16 - Councir Minutes 8/18/86 Mayor Mandic reiterated that if a building permit had been issued Council could not stop that permit, however, this action would stop any further per- mits from being issued on the remaining buildable lots on the property in question. Councilman MacAllister asked the City Attorney whether she believed Council had sufficient evidence to issue the moratorium at this time without having full written reports. The City Attorney stated she would present a written ordinance to Council out- lining the exact lot and the requirements of the code section involved and if Council had a problem with it the ordinance could be modified. She stated the moratorium would be effective tonight. Th4p motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: ~-- None ABSENT: Kelly HR-6 - asIBUS MTER AV9WRCES BILL - IErM TO BE VOWTM IN 9MPORr HR-6 EXCEPT OPPOSE S. 11R The City Attorney pres ed a verbal report on -6, the Omnibus Water Resources Bill. Discussion was held regardin the matter. A motion was made by Green, s ded by Ba to inform federally elected officials that the City of Hun on Bea is in favor of Omnibus Bill HR-6 and is opposed to Section 119 (Relat' to financing mechanism of Real Estate Transfer Tax). The motion ri y the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Finley, Mandi iley, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: Kelly REAPPOINl'M@Tr TO EIIVIRCI*I2n!AL On motion by Finley, s Green, Co 1 unanimously reappointed Kay Seraphine and Corrine Wel to the Environmerl Board to terms to expire June 30, 1990. PFCPIOSW FIREWORKS - TO BE CONSILE WD 86 VaLA Councilwoman Fins inquired into the status of proposed ordinance per- taining to fir s. The City Administrator infor Council that the matter was scheduled far consideration at the September 2, Council meeting. D-2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH oawe#j INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �ilelr ��' *0%* fir it ��► �y�../,Af �� �'ldl�p� f'./'E'CL� To TOM LIVENGOOD From GAIL HUTTON Chairman, Planning Commission City Attorney �p Subject Moody Circle Date August 14, 1986 Since the last meeting of the planning commission, this office has been besieged with citizens inquiries regarding Moody Circle. First, Mr . Moody came in declaring that he had been defamed. He supplied a tape of the meeting. No defamation appeared on the tape supplied. He must have been defamed at another time. Next, I received an RLS from James Palin regarding a request from the Planning Commission to bring a restraining order against Moody because of- certain alleged bootleg conversions in properties at Moody Circle, which properties are in the hands of subsequent owners. The restraining order would be against Ken Moody to prevent some sort of future criminal violations (bootleg conversions) or to delay construction on lots where building permits are already issued pending some change in the law. I cannot comply. This office only brings litigation at the behest of the City Council. Thus, it takes "four votes' before I will bring an action. There are a few exceptions to this policy not relevant here. Neither the City Administrator, any individual councilperson, the Mayor, or any Department Head has the power to control litigation. This is a charter duty of the council itself . Thus, your request should properly go to the council. If the council, by minute order, requests a restraining order on Mr . Moody or others, I will review the request. After I received the RLS from James Palin, I received a memo from him wherein it was stated that there were no real violations in the Moody Circle four-plex units . No actionable ones at least. (Copy attached. ) The homeowners seem to have as their real objection the street alignment and traffic patterns . Perhaps I have missed the point on what the commission feels should be done here, what is wrong or what the issue is that is so troublesome to so many. However, it is quite impossible merely to pull a validly issued building permit or to enjoin its use merely because irate neighbors no matter how many or how vocal are disturbed by the permit or its use. Frequently, a property owner will request a building permit for the use of property which may be in conflict with a contemplated change in land use. Government Code S65858 authorizes the = adoption of an interim ordinance prohibiting such use pending .a TOM LIVENGOOD August 141 - 1986 Page 2 proposed study of the problem. _ Rather than an injunction which no court is going to grant under these facts, the Planning Commission might suggest the Council adopt a Government Code S65858 moratorium. Such moratorium could be for study of a specific plan of street alignment or the zoning and are universally upheld. A copy of Government Code 65858 is attached. f - GA HUTTOI City Attorney cc: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Planning Commission Honorable Mayor Mandic & Members of the City Council James Palin, Director Development Services Attachment I ., a r�[.•="$..y—r"—rjat•.. _ - 4k REQUEA FOR CITY COUNCILCTION Date October 6, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council , Submitted by: itt Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator �W • Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: EXTENSION OF URGENCY MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PE ITS - ORDINANCE NO. 2869 � pp 6 p Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception V�G•��` °''0 7 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On August 18, 1986, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 establishing a forty-five (45 ) day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (lot at southerly end of Moody Circle) . This 45-day moratorium expires October 2, 1986. The California Government Code allows building moratoriums to be extended for a period of 10 months and 15 days after the initial 45-day period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council not extend the urgency moratorium on building permits for Lot 6 of Tract 12206. ANALYSIS: Adoption of the urgency building moratorium on the lot (Lot 6) at the southern end of Moody Circle was to preclude development so that it could be reviewed to determine if and how Moody Circle might be integrated with conceptual street layouts for the vicinity and future development of Meadowlark Airport. Prior to discussing optional layouts, though, a brief history of easements and of Moody Circle is necessary. In 1919, Tract 86 was recorded which established 50 foot wide easements for the benefit of access to several 5 acre parcels (see attached Map #1 ) throughout the Meadowlark Airport area and vicinity. As far as we know, these easements still exist. Pearce Drive was one of those easements which has evolved logically into a central access point to Bolsa Chica for development in the area . In 1972, Tract 7805 for 20 single family residential lots was developed on one of those 5 acre parcels (see Map #2) on the north side of Pearce Drive. Tract 9275 for 50 single family residential lots was subsequently developed in 1976, also on the northside of Pearce Drive. Both subdivisions contained lots fronting Pearce Drive. I G P10 4/84 The City Council approved Tentative Tract 12206 (see map no. 2) and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 (which had been appealed by a neighbor from the Planning Commission approval ) based on recommendations from staff and the Planning Commission in 1984. Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) was an eleven (11 ) lot subdivision for development of aprtment units on the south side of Pearce Drive. At that time, the City Council reviewed two street layouts, one with Moody Circle accessing Bolsa Chica and the other connecting Moody Circle to Pearce Drive. Public Works Department, Development Services Department and the Planning Commission recommended the access to Pearce Drive alternative in order to minimize ingress and egress onto Bolsa Chica. Several people spoke at the City Council meeting. Comments in favor of Pearce Drive were: o Most desirable layout from a public safety standpoint o Pearce Drive is not used as frequently as Bolsa Chica o A T-intersection onto Bolsa Chica would cause greater traffic hazards and conflicts on Bolsa Chica o Awkward access to the site from southbound traffic would be created with the Bolsa Chica access alterative o Cross traffic movement would be necessary into and out of the Bolsa Chica access alternative o Local street access on west side of Bolsa Chica in similar fashion. Comments against Pearce Drive access and for Bolsa Chica access included: o Negative impact of headlight glare to two homes on the north side of Pearce Drive at T-intersection. o Traffic hazards created to children on Pearce Drive o Increase noise on Pearce Drive o Potential parking problem on Pearce Drive from insufficient parking on-site and on-street for apartment projects . o Maximum R2 density allowed is proposed which increases traffic and noise o Pearce Drive is the only access to the subdivision and should be limited in use. o Street access to apartments and single family residences should be separated to reduce conflicts. RCA - 10/6/86 -2- (6320d) On August 6, 1986, the Planning Commission denied Tentative Tract 12756 (Broberg) and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 (see map no. 2) , an 8-lot subdivision for an apartment development on the east side of Bolsa Chica directly south of Tract 12206 (Moody) . An appeal has been filed on the denial. The project is pending before the City Council . A zone change to change the property (Broberg) to commercial has also been filed and is pending before the Planning Commission. A general plan amendment and zone change has been filed for a change of land uses on the Meadowlark Airport property. This project is tentatively scheduled before the Planning Commission in February 1987. Based on the proposed land uses, a conceptual precise plan of street alignment (Map #3 ) has been prepared by a traffic consultant analyzing the site. This layout has been preliminarily accepted by Public Works. Access is shown through the site from Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue with a branch to Pearce Drive. Any access to Bolsa Chica other than through Pearce Drive is not recommended by the Traffic Division because of the impact upon Bolsa Chica and that Pearce Drive will some day be signalized. Two suggested alternatives were submitted by the Pearce Drive neighborhood group (Map #4 and #5 ) . On September 24, 1986, Development Services and Public Works Department staff met with three individuals from the neighborhood, one Planning Commissioner, Mr . Moody and a representative for Mr . Broberg to discuss the moratorium and alternatives to reduce or eliminate the concerns of the neighbors. Four options were suggested: 1 ) Have a traffic study by an independent traffic consultant to analyze the circulation and traffic situation and make recommendations to mitigate the traffic concerns (i .e. striping, stop signs, rerouting of Moody Circle) . 2) Establish an assessment district to purchase property from Mr . Moody and Mr . Broberg for Moody Circle southerly extension to Bolsa Chica and northerly closure at Pearce Drive . 3 ) Neighbors would agree to support zone change of Broberg property to commercial if Moody Circle is rerouted. 4) The City will attempt to minimize traffic flow to Pearce Drive from future Meadowlark Airport development by street design and traffic devices. RCA - 10/6/86 -3- (6320d ) The Traffic Division maintains their position that Pearce Drive should serve as the main access point and that establishing multiple intersections along a six-lane major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicles on the public roads under these conditions . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The extension of the moratorium is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Extend the moratorium for 10 months and 15 days and direct staff to engage an independent traffic consultant to prepare a circulation and traffic study of the Moody Circle, Pearce Drive, Bolsa Chica and potential Meadowlark Airport development area and make a recommendation for improvements. ATTACHMENTS• 1 . Draft Ordinance No. 2869 for extension 2. Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 (to be submitted) 3. Map 1 - 1919 Easements 4. Map 2 - Subdivisions 5. Map 3 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout prepard by Traffic Consultant 6. Map 4 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout A - prepared by neighbors 7. Map 5 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout B - prepared by neighbors 8. Minutes from November 19, 1984 City Council meeting pertaining to Tentative Tract 12206 and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 9. Planning Commission staff report dated August 5, 1986 of Tentative Tract 12756 and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 JWP:SH:kla RCA - 10/6/86 -4- (6320d) Publish - 9/25/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2869 (Extension of Moratorium - Moody Circle) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the matter described below. DATE: October 6, 1986 TIME: 7:30 PM SUBJECT: Proposed Urgency Ordinance No. 2869 - "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE" LOCATION: Lot 6 of Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle). PROPOSAL: To extend the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for 10 months and 15 days. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt ON FILE: A copy of the ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the matter as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 -�) 2f i 4 ` • Publish - 9/25/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 2869 (Extension of Moratorium - Moody Circle) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the matter described below. DATE: October 6, 1986 TIME: 7:30 PM SUBJECT: Proposed Urgency Ordinance No. 2869 - "AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE" LOCATION: Lot 6 of Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle). PROPOSAL: To extend the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for 10 months and 15 days. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt ON FILE: A copy of the ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express A opinions or submit evidence for or against the matter as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 or as .., At ® ® ® Z .r r rr ®r .- . • 0 -1 h ~ Zetlaw i G!•Gt . L " ® S AIE NMI MCI "'° 'e°s PEARCE = w t JIA •' V V i9 L3�t1 S! i W• � !i � �t� � J y / 1 N E :!✓r , ® � ACT' �, f,- w 50 !7 + t6 •{ 20-1 310. 15 AG l � t - t / 2 u PAR / t P.JR2 R •s r.�' e v /6 i J/ Z Pa a s i' P.S 3 0 OM ,,.70 5 ' � l co CIO �• � i•s S �.o t[i 40 0, !: (4 4T see ��1 • pis"l w 1�' . �. �I 3 SOS iza Z.05 AG 44 • WARNER = d AVENUE (w/nrrFRSB� avF 1 t 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRVPos&D 9j,na -P "Jv. Aoop,1or" 0 W1 -- -kkood�l Ctrc.l e NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: October 6, 1986 TIME: 7: 30 PM -�tc- f l r-Pos�"d. A - R: Ordinance No. 2869 — LOCATION: Lot 6 of Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle ) . PROPOSAL: To extend the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for 10 months and 15 days . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt ON FILE: A copy of the ordinance is on file in the -'=CT 1-s-office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 ( 6298d) SAY t • ® ! N ® q. e r ' 04 33 • M (091 AO.l271 1_ At0 AN" PEARCE _ N o� vc *) , •:CttrSL! LArd �1, 11' .ry ftv It 14 , Om cg) kA- ro • •ate r»r7 j t livt fL: / i t 7 w 16 / At30.I$ AG •. z A 12 f-W-11WEA MAP r PAR I •�� P.?.7 2 -� .• � Z P,4,7 a Q0 5- ' Z. y i s .,� t, tJ .j aT s3o J •,s 4O r `+ 3 2 • lza kAO SR tu Z.B3 4G i s' s' a�• s• O lei Zs " WARNER s •_ ; AVENUE w/ro�setM AVE.) t� 163- tEsuE tAaF 2 -- ---- TO AN1 _ — .©Ar 40 16 IV At iv _ Ole e E © 4 i:. All Mrs t rmc • 1 PEARCF a*.,vt + s • :r '' �H„ sty •,cs�rtc� cart - / /ov' sr% k 3i 107 + t6 •� , rs / 4G. jjrr�� 3J./S •�C. � , / 2 u PAR PJR2Fit � A 12EA MAP PAP 4 : PA j @3 CID t G o V 47' s3a _� • 41 Sao' S38 • ' } _.+ • _ so- to► WARNER AVENUE t w,n►TERSBta�G .ovE� "128 s .t _ • • 1 - �,( f//. ice' ./ �r ZZ ORDINANCE NO. ` OF THE CITY OF O� AN IN�RI1r! URGE ICY ORDINANCE ` • HUNTI�'NG__TON BEAC , ISSUANCE OF 11,Z° BUILDING PERMIT? FOR CONSTRUCTION 44 C E /11 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington% Beach desires to establish a forty-five ( 45 ) day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for new construction within an area bordered by Bolsa Chica, Warner, Roosevelt and Pearce, as more particularly described on a map attached as Exhibit A incorporated by reference herein; and At the present time the City is studying the precise plan of street alignment; 'and The City needs time to consider, draft, and present. a precise plan of street alignment for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council within such interim moratorium period, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of i Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 . A forty-five ( 45) day :moratorium is hereby established upon the issuance of building permits for new {4 construction described on Exhibit A. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, and that the approval of building permits for new construction described would result in a threat to public health, safety, or welfare in that the Planning Division of the Department . of Development Services is presently conducting a comprehensive - w- • v_.:- - � _ , . :; _ -�_ ��:. -.__r._�.. �.�_vim --- MINUTES 00 Council Chamber, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, August 25, 1986 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk's Office Mayor Mandic called the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 4:30 P.M. &OLL CALL present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey Absent: Green, Thomas RES NO 5706 - ADOPTED - 1986/87 TAR RATE The Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the Chief of AWnitrative Services transmitting Resolution No. 5706 - "A RESOLUTION OF Ta CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIRING THE FISCAL YEAR 1986/87 TAR RATE IN SAID CITY." The Director of Finance presented a staff report. On motion by MacAllister, second Mandic, Council adopted Resolution No. 5706 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey NOES: None ABSENT: Green, Thomas PROPOSED URGENCY ORDINANCE NO 2867 - MORATORIUM PROHIBITING ISSUANCE OF ILAING PERMITS - MOODY CIRCLE Proposed Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 was distributed to Council - "AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PROHIBITING ISSUANCE Of BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WITHIN AN AREA BORDERED BY BOLSA CSICA, WARNER, ROOSEVELT AND PEARCE." Discussion was held regarding the matter. ADJOURNMENT 'Vyor Mandic adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of *atington Beach to 5:30 P.M. , Tuesday, September 2, 1986 in Room B-8, Civic Center. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California BY p ' .Deputy City Alicia M. Wentworth C tY er Mayor putt' City Clerk OF Page 13 - Council Minutes - 11/17/86 A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Green, to offer to settle with State i Farm Insurance for $20,000 to settle City's Cross Complaint relative to the case of Brand vs City - (Claim #84-115). The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: None MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PERMITS FOR LOT #6 OF TRACT 12206 - NO ACTION TAKEN - (MOODY CIRCLE) The City Clerk presented a communication from the Development Services Direc- tor regarding the moratorium on building permits for Lot #6 - Tract 12206 Moody Circle. The Director of Development Services stated that he had received letters from both Mr. Moody and Mr. Broberg and that they were not in agreement. He recom- mended that the existing ordinance remain in effect until such time as they reach an agreement. Discussion was held between Council and staff regarding the length of the moratorium. By consensus of Council it was determined that no further action was necessary. ORDINANCES ADOPTED On motion by MacAllister, seconded by Bailey, Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 2870, 2879, 2882, 2883, 2884 and 2885, after reading by title, by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: None ORDINANCE NO. 2870 - ADOPTED - PROPERTY MAINTENANCE "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICI- PAL CODE BY AMENDING TITLE 17 ADDING THEBSETO NEW CHAPTER 17.10 SECTIONS 17.10.010 THROUGH 17.10.180 ENTITLED "PROPERTY ORDINANCE NO. 2879 - ADOPTED - NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 971 AND ADDING THERETO ARTICLE 965 ENTI- TLED "NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS." �_Ej NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING / loi� PROPOSEDA'ORDINANCE NO 2912 (Extension of Moratorium - Moody Circle) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, August 17, 1987 TIME: 7:00 P.M. ,r►'�� V'�`- � SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance No. 2912 - "A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EX ENDING A MORATORIUM ON VE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE FOR PURPOSES OF FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT." LOCATION: Lot 6 of Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle) PROPOSAL: To consider extending the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for up to one year. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt I�r,rr ON FILE: A copy of theAordinance is on file in the Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: August 5, 1987 V0- 4- 1-7 7 Publish - 9f2'J 6Vr HUN",NGT^N ^_ACH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DEVE" N0. 2 ~ ' ►�s PROPOSED 9Wffl@q ORDINANCE N. 0. B.:X 190 ension of Moratorium - Moody Circle)Huntington Beach,CA 92648 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the matter described below. DATE: A0dr t 7 t lot 1547 9'd0 7: TIME: AV PM Ir -� SUBJECT: Proposed $jJINW Ordinance No. ANS9 - "AN MOOMY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE"r0I. F0(40SCS 0 f Q11)ft g11$W" 00-4 '-Pt M Rc M - LOCATION: Lot 6 of Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of 'Moody Circle) s� a6i•ierorr �1 PROPOSAL: To j\extend±Y�the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 fork s. oy\,L ;,1&W , J ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: p Categorically exempt ON FILE: A copy of the ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the matter as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTI]NCTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (114) 536-5405 I i `f 3 i a �DSYSLOPME�tT<s vzcss= ..�-.q.r;r_.....�M.ii'. ,. � - .-i a�i�. ,•_ ems•. ,�. y-�sJ�w� 1SOOD `CIACLB = -_ Dats `� 'I�ugust Subject _ _ ,_; i7ri- - -.- x A ak. .maw., As requested by�the Planning Commisaign, -Development Services staff ; r nspe'�tedt tdnMody Cchas i e le o o e to determine if--any zoning violations presently ezist 'on the site.. = Listed below are the results' of the -inspections. 16761 Moody Circle - 1. No evidence of -attic areas being used as bedrooms. 2. Recreation room had not been converted to kitchen or additional unit. Recreation room does contain counter tops, sink and cabinets . 3. Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - 5 16751 Moody Circle 1 . No evidence of attic areas being used as bedrooms. 2. Recreation room had not been converted to kitchen or additional unit. Recreation room does contain counter tops, sinks and cabinets . 3 . Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric 16752 Moody Circle 1 . Presently under construction. No violations were observed by staff during the inspection of the property. 16762 Moody Circle 1 . As of August 6, 1986, this building was not occupied. No violations were observed by staff during the inspection. 2. Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - r­J_!t 16771 Moody Circle' Presently under, construction" Noviolatrons observed. '�''` � ; _ .1. - y ' ..r Y-�X -ti�`-s-t �,.•.. #. �..,rR-3r•'a- � ' emu... _ -:- '•- <�...J' -T _ t '� �...•Y ,+.� +,-�ae��3 ---er _ _ .'"�,- �-'-� -tea^ �''-� <it -•z __ _ �- rX`'�'�•. � _S K i f}iA.t xf Vy:- good r All �.n -•..'i�`a's� - �` +}ff��" 6�'� �.� _'" _ ""` k ae.:, .** � 3ti'g�, y r 1.�i..-�sc- �• � - ' 16772 Moo ciy�Circle fir; 1. No violations were observed by staff =during the fnspect on T conducted on August 61 1986. 2. Number'`of "meters observed: r,gas 4 ' electric- ' r 16801 Moody Circle 1 . Turning radius for garages located on south side of building was 22 feet to temporary wood fence. Property line located approximately 2 feet 6 inches ± from temporary wood fences. Turning radius will be approximately 24 feet 6 inches at such time that southerly property is built out. - 2. The attic area was being used as a bedroom by the tenant's 14 year old daughter . The tenant was requested to immediately relocate the bed to an approved bedroom. The tenant agreed to do so immediately. 3 . No other zoning violations were observed during the inspection of the building. 4 . Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric 16802 Moody Circle 1 . Turning radius was taped at 25 feet from outsie dimension of garage door . No violations were observed during the inspection. 2. Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - Records on file in the Department of Development Services do not indicate that permits were issued for the glass enclosures. To rectify this situation, the property owner is required to submit constructin drawings to be reviewed by this department. The structures are required to comply with all codes including setbacks, light, air and ventilations, Title 24 (energy) and open space. MS:kla (5867d) a r` t• � a �`i'P � -�`e-a' � ,�v�2-�ar- t• _t r .r. �-� ��-'r �-d - - ���R'rK - _. _ �"._'�' "x.�'.��_�'.oK �_�....�-w �.:-+�;ate rt��,"��:y' � .�. .". � �,.'+i.:+. .cry- - r `''u'� - _ •" �+. - ' -- - .4 a..a..w, - `+ 4-f rem ems..-R �`a. 'ate—�•� - ...z, _..- -�.rv. _- --._ -.. - �{r":�.".7 2 -_<-s.z, _ �c � �� ';`;f .rJ�'.7R• � _ _r- _ - Y.'1"'a-.'sa�+� _1 1' u J 4 REQUBC OR CITY COUNC6, ACTION f Data October 6, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 'GV� , s Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: EXTENSION OF URGENCY MORATORIUM ON BUILDING PE ITS ORDINANCE NO. 2869 pp Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes t j New Policy or Exception UeG• ' �O ro 9 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On August 18 , 1986, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 establishing a forty-five (45) day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (lot at southerly end of Moody Circle) . This 45-day moratorium expires October 2, 1986. The California Government Code allows building moratoriums to be extended for a period of 10 months and 15 days after the initial 45-day period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council not extend the urgency moratorium on building permits for Lot 6 of Tract 12206. ANALYSIS: Adoption of the urgency building moratorium on the lot (Lot 6) at the southern end of Moody Circle was to preclude development so that it could be reviewed to determine if and how Moody Circle might be integrated with conceptual street layouts for the vicinity and future development of Meadowlark Airport. Prior to discussing optional layouts, though, a brief history of easements and of Moody Circle is necessary. In 1919 , Tract 86 was recorded which established 50 foot wide easements for the benefit of access to several 5 acre parcels (see attached Map #1 ) throuv_hout the Meadowlark Airport area and vicinity. As far as we know, these easements still exist. Pearce Drive was one of those easements which has evolved logically into a central access point to Bolsa Chica for development in the area. In 1972, Tract 7805 for 20 single family residential lots was developed on one of those 5 acre parcels (see Map #2) on the north side of Pearce Drive. Tract 9275 for 50 single family residential lots was subsequently developed in 1976, also on the northside of Pearce Drive. Both subdivisions contained lots fronting Pearce Drive. Ce P10 4/84 The City Council approved Tentative Tract 12206 (see map no. 2) and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 (which had been appealed by a neighbor from the Planning Commission approval) based on recommendations from staff and the Planning Commission in 1984. Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) was an eleven (11 ) lot subdivision for development of aprtment units on the south side of Pearce Drive. At that time, the City Council reviewed two street layouts, one with Moody Circle accessing Bolsa Chica and the other connecting Moody Circle to Pearce Drive. Public Works Department, Development Services Department and the Planning Commission recommended the access to Pearce Drive alternative in order to minimize ingress and egress onto Bolsa Chica. Several people spoke at the City Council meeting. Comments in favor of Pearce Drive were: o Most desirable layout from a public safety standpoint o Pearce Drive is not used as frequently as Bolsa Chica o A T-intersection onto Bolsa Chica would cause greater traffic hazards and conflicts on Bolsa Chica o Awkward access to the site from southbound traffic would be created with the Bolsa r-hica access alterative o Cross traffic movement would be necessary into and out of the Bolsa Chica access alternative o Local street access on west side of Bolsa Chica in similar fashion. Comments against Pearce Drive access and for Bolsa Chica access included: o Negative impact of headlight glare to two homes on the north side of Pearce Drive at T-intersection. o Traffic hazards created to children on Pearce Drive o Increase noise on Pearce Drive o Potential parking problem on Pearce Drive from insufficient parking on-site and on-street for apartment projects. o Maximum R2 density allowed is proposed which increases traffic and noise o Pearce Drive is the only access to the subdivision and should be limited in use. o Street access to apartments and single family residences should be separated to reduce conflicts. RCA - 10/6/86 -2- (6320d) On August 6, 1986, the Planning Commission denied Tentative Tract 12756 (Broberg) and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 (see map no. 2) , an 8-lot subdivision for an apartment development on the east side of Bolsa Chica directly south of Tract 12206 (Moody) . An appeal has been filed on the denial. The project is pending before the City Council . A zone change to change the property (Broberg) to commercial has also been filed and is pending before the Planning Commission. A general plan amendment and zone change has been filed for a change of land uses on the Meadowlark Airport property. This project is tentatively scheduled before the Planning Commission in February 1987. Based on the proposed land uses, a conceptual precise plan of street alignment (Map #3 ) has been prepared by a traffic consultant analyzing the site. This layout has been preliminarily accepted by Public Works. Access is shown through the site from Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue with a branch to Pearce Drive. Any access to Bolsa Chica other than through Pearce Drive is not recommended by the Traffic Division because of the impact upon Bolsa Chica and that Pearce Drive will some day be signalized. Two suggested alternatives were submitted by the Pearce Drive neighborhood group (Map #4 and #5 ) . On September 24, 1986, Development Services and Public Works Department staff met with three individuals from the neighborhood, one Planning Commissioner, Mr. Moody and a representative for Mr . Broberg to discuss the moratorium and alternatives to reduce or eliminate the concerns of the neighbors. Four options were suggested: 1 ) Have a traffic study by an independent traffic consultant to analyze the circulation and traffic situation and make recommendations to mitigate the traffic concerns ( i .e. striping, stop signs, rerouting of Moody Circle ) . 2) Establish an assessment district to purchase property from Mr . Moody and Mr . Broberg for Moody Circle southerly extension to Bolsa Chica and northerly closure at Pearce Drive. 3 ) Neighbors would agree to support zone change of Broberg property to commercial if Moody Circle is rerouted. 4) The City will attempt to minimize traffic flow to Pearce Drive from future Meadowlark Airport development by street design and traffic devices. RCA - 10/6/86 -3- (6320d) The Traffic Division maintains their position that Pearce Drive should serve as the main access point and that establishing multiple intersections along a six-lane major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicles on the public roads under these conditions . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The extension of the moratorium is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Extend the moratorium for 10 months and 15 days and direct staff to engage an independent traffic consultant to prepare a circulation and traffic study of the Moody Circle, Pearce Drive, Bolsa Chica and potential Meadowlark Airport development area and make a recommendation for improvements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance No. 2869 for extension 2. Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 (to be submitted) 3. Map 1 - 1919 Easements 4. Map 2 - Subdivisions 5. Map 3 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout prepard by Traffic Consultant 6. Map 4 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout A - prepared by neighbors 7. Map 5 - Airport Site Conceptual Street Layout B - prepared by neighbors 8. Minutes from November 19, 1984 City Council meeting pertaining to Tentative Tract 12206 and Conditional Exception No. 84-05 9. Planning Commission staff report dated August 5 , 1986 of Tentative Tract 12756 and Conditional Exception No. 86-44 JWP:SH:kla RCA - 10/6/86 -4- (6320d) ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 , IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on August 18, 1986, enacted a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 , in the vicinity of Moody Circle, and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to establish and extend a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for new construction on Lot 6 of Tract 12206, in the vicinity of Moody Circle, as more particularly described on a map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, and At the present time the city is studying the precise plan of street alignment including said property, and The city needs time to consider , draft, and present a precise plan of street alignment for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council within such interim moratorium period and to consider, draft, and present ordinances to govern develop- ment of said property, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1 . A moratorium is hereby established upon and extended the issuance of building permits for new construction on said property. The duration of the moratorium shall extend for ten months and fifteen days after adoption of this ordinance. 1. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare, and i that the approval of building permits on other applicable entitlements for new construction would result in a threat to.. public health, safety, or welfare, in that the Planning Division of the Department of Development Services is presently conducting a comprehensive study of the existing land uses in the area. The City Council recognizes that it will be necessary for the Planning Commission to study, hold hearings, and consider proposals for a new precise plan of street alignment and new development regulations prior to consideration by council. It would be destructive of the precise plan of street alignment and development regulations if, during the period they are being considered and st d4.--d and are the subject of public hearings, development occurs which might defeat the whole or any part of the ultimate objective of such precise plan of street alignment or development regulations. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published within fifteen ( 15 ) days of its adoption in a newspaper of general circulation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1986 Mayor 2. :l ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator irector of D el pment Services i 3. Autho i:sh zed ,� P Advertisements or all kinds '�C!uding public i. ub notices by L)ecree of the Superior Court of Orange County, Caiifour`a. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961. and A-241;31 dated 11 June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA � �y County of Orange PubIK N000O AO�Wlwng wed PUBLIC NOTICE —I by Itnf •rtlCfwt q set r, r print min 10 ptcr,column.win NOTICE HEARING ` PUBLIC PROPOSED URGENCY I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of ORDINANCE N0.2AN the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen Moraorium f Moratorium- years, and not a party to or interested in the below Moody Circle) NOTICE he HEREBY entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange each Ciityteou ci wtii hold Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the a public hearing in theCoun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, `2000 Beach Civic Center, p g f 2000 Main Street, Hunt- printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, Iington Beach,California,on p Y the date and at the time in- dicated below to receive and County of Orange, State of California, and that a consider the statements of Notice of PUBLIC HEARING hea dr►elan a to the to be described below. DATE:October 6,1986 TIME:7:30 PM SUBJECT: Proposed Ur- gency Ordinance No.2869- of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete AN URGENCY ORDI- NANCE OF THE CITY OF copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, HUNTINGTON BEACH EX- TENDING A MORATORIUM Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT ONE TIME VICINITY OFI2206 IN THE MOODY CIR- Beach issues of said newspaper for ��y� CLE" c; ZiN �E'�.S to wit the issue(s) of LOCATION: LOT 8 of dXA Tract 12208(Vacant parcel t the southerly end of Moody Circle). PROPOSAL: To extend the moratorium on building Septemb. r 5 6 permits on Lot 6 of Tract _ 198 12206 for 10 months and 15 days. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically ex- 198 empt. ON FILE: A copy of the ordinance Is on file In the Department of Development _ 198 Services,2000 Mein Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648,for Inspection by the public. 198 ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence 198 for or against the application as outlined above.All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of I declare, under :r y of that the the City Clerk, 2000 Main perjury, Street, Huntington Beach, foregoing is true -_ - correct. California,for Inspection the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCR., Sr.' Alicia September 25 6 Phone:���Ii1CI Clerk, 51111115 Executed on 1 98 — Published Orange Coast Sta Mesa, Calif.prnia. D9ailyy 86 Pilot September 25, Th 13f; Signature �V E►s�`0 � OF EAU ICAI*10 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 87-99 • COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION • HUNTINGTON BEACH -- - - To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thomps n City Council Members City Administrato Subject STAFF RECOMMENDATION REGARDING Date July 30, 1987 MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR 2 _ LOT #6 OF TRACT 12206 ✓ �.,j _ �� (MOODY CIRCLE) ! 1 0 9 Transmitted for your review and consideration is the status of the moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) . The City Council may either not extend the existing moratorium on issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 or direct staff to prepare an ordinance for the August 17, 1987 City Council meeting to extend the moratorium for,one year and initiate a precise plan of street alignment to extend Moody Circle southerly through the adjacent two-acre site then westerly to Bolsa Chica Street. If the moratorium is not extended, building permits could be issued for a triplex upon Lot #6 and Moody Circle will remain connected to • Pearce. If the moratorium is extended, a precise plan of street alignment to extend Moody Circle southerly could be initiated and if adopted would prevent any development other than a street on Lot #6 . This action would necessitate acquisition of the property by the City since it precludes any use of the land; the City must compensate the property owner for this action. Then, when the adjoining southerly 2-acre parcel is developed, land necessary to complete this precisely planned street alignment will be required through dedication as a condition of approval for that development. The perspective purchaser (Coultrup Development Co. ) of the adjacent southerly 2 acre parcel has also attempted to acquire the lot for extending Moody Circle in order to pursue their future development plans . They have been unsuccessful . A report in response to the City Council direction will be prepared for the August 17, 1987 City Council meeting. CWT:DNL:SH:kla (8739d) i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 87-92 COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION . HUNTINGTON LEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thom City Council Members City Administrator r Subject STATUS REPORT OF THE Date July 1 7 , 1987 MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR LOT NO. 6 OF TRACT 12206 017`P41t7 DEScv3sioh L&OcC— (LOT AT SOUTHERLY END OF MOODY CIRCLE) On October 6, 1986, the City Council adopted interim Ordinance No. 2869 extending theww�"Kz moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 in order to allow the property owners and developer to arrive at a compromise with City-'staff for an exten- sion of Moody Circle southerly through Lot #6 and across the southerly adjacent 2 acre site routing westerly to Bolsa Chica Street. Since that time, staff has had numerous discussions with the affected parties. Several development scenerios addressing the Moody Circle realignment and adjacent two acre site were reviewed which included multiple family residential with density bonus, senior citizen complex, retail commercial, and restaurant. However, a joint development agreement was never reached. On April 30, 1987, a letter was received from Janet Moody, property owner of Lot #6, • indicating she will not sell this property (see attached). This created a block to further negotiations. As of June, 1987, Harbor Bank owns the adjacent southerly two-acre site (formerly owned by Jack Broberg). Coultrup Development Co. is a prospective buyer whose intent is to develop multiple family residential. They have indicated a willingness to work with the City in creating a plan for the 2-acre site acceptable to all concerned parties; and will be submitting a development plan within the next month. It does not, however, include realignment of Moody Circle because they do not have control of Lot#6. A petition was submitted, signed by residents within the Bolsa Chica/Pearce area, outlining their development ideas and suggested conditions for the 2-acre site and Moody Circle realignment (see attached). Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2, Area 2.1 in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report 87-2 is a request by the Nerio family to redesignate 65 acres (Meadowlark Airport) located on the north side of Warner Avenue, south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street from Low Density Residential to a mixture of Low Density Residential (375 units), 5 acres of Senior Citizen Residential (250 units) and 15 acres of Commercial (196,020 gross square feet). This request along with staff's evaluation and analysis (including the impact of traffic circulation to surrounding areas) will be reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 28, 1987. Development of Meadowlark Airport will be provided with sufficient access to Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue and secondary access to Bolsa Chica via Pearce. Access out Pearce from the future Meadowlark Airport development will be available but designed to discourage motorists to utilize as a major connector. In staff's preliminary evaluation of the traffic circulation for the Bolsa Chica and Pearce area, future buildout of these underdeveloped and undeveloped lots combined with existing developments within the R2 zoned area will not cause a measurable traffic impact upon the future Meadowlark Airport development. Status Report of Moratorium Page 2 • The area south of Pearce and east of Bolsa Chica Street was originally developed as rural residential (homes on overly large lots). In 1971, the area was rezoned to R2 (Multiple Family Residential) because of the amount of undeveloped land, large lots conducive to multiple family development and proximity to commercial uses. Recently, multiple family development activities has increased the normal transitional period (low density residential recycling to medium density residential) causing disruption to the single family residential property owners. In order to mitigate future conflicts between the existing single family residences and multiple family developments, the Meadowlark Airport Specific Plan could be expanded to include this area. Then, such items as additional landscaping, setbacks, architectural review circulation patterns, and Planning Commission review, as opposed to Zoning Administrator or Building Plan Check approval, could be required. Staff will discuss this option with the Planning Commission on July 28. A report will be prepared for the August 3, 1987 City Council meeting to discuss various I alternatives to the moratorium and the Planning Commission's comments relative to including this area within an expanded Meadowlark Airport Specific Plan. ATTACHMENTS: A. RCA dated November 17, 1986 • B. Letter from Janet Moody dated April 30, 1987 C. Petition from Bolsa Chica/Pearce area residents D. Conceptual Meadowlark Airport Circulation Plan CWT:SH:gbm (8625d) i � 011 3 p! 12 : 29 Di M. DEVEL. \TO: HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEFT DATE: 11-13-86 MESSES: JIM PALEN/SCOTT HESS FROM: JACK BROBERG RE: BOLSA CHICA/MOODY CIRCLE PROPERTIES SITE DEVELOPMENT. � IN DISCUSSIONS WITH KEN MOODY REGARDING THE FEASABILITY OF ACQUIRING HIS LOT 6 FOR INCLUSION IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON MY- TWO ACRE R-2 PARCEL THE FOLLOWING POINTS OF TENTATIVE AGREEMENT ARE: 1--ON THE SUGGESTED PRICE FOR LOT 6 WITH THE EST. COSTS FOR THE ROADWAY AND LAMD FOR SUCH PURPOSES WILL REQUIRE AT LEAST 45 UNITS. THE FOREGOING ASSUMES THAT THE R-2 REQUIREMENTS WOULD ALLOW 45 UNITS IN TERMS OF PARKING, SPACING, BEDROOMS ETC. THAT TIME IS THE ESSENCE AS IT HAS BEEN SINCE JULY THAT THIS PROBLEM STARTED AND AS YOUR AWARE IS A VERY COSTLY PROCESS TO DATE. 4~- ADDITIONAL. ALLOWANCE OF THREE UNITS ON MR. MOODY' S TRACT 1 206 IF FEASIBLE IS REQUIRED. d 1 ti MCKITTRICK, ..JACKSON, DEMARCO & RECKENP4G4-- A LAW CORPORATION - / f`ryCp 4041 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD / m POST OFFICE BOX 2710 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92658-8995 RICHARD J.ALBRECHT ANDREW K. MAUTHE (714) 752-8585 TELECOPIER 17141'.752-0597 MARC ALEXANDER W. ERNEST MOONEY TELEX: 494-333 >MJOP1 GREGG A.AMBER ROBERT B. MOORE DAVID G. BARATTI JAMES B.O'NEAL January 12, 1987 KARLA L. BELL ROBERT E.OPERA DAVID L.COLGAN THOMAS D. PECKENPAUGH WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: JAM ES R. DEMARCO JOHN PETRASICH STEVEN J. DZIDA LYN K. PHILIPPS ROGER S.GREENE TODD C. RINGSTAD F.SCOTT JACKSON JOSEF M.RODARTI OUR FILE NUMBER: A LLAN I.KROLL JAMES L. ROSS MARGARET A. LACHUK GEORGE C. RUDOLPH IRA D. LEBOVIC NANETTE D.SANDERS 19118 WILLIAM N. LOBEL LEONARD M.SHULMAN M IC HAEL D.MCCAFFREY ERITHE A.SMITH STACY W, MCDANIEL JAY R.STEINMAN REX A, MCKITTRICK MARC J.WINTHROP PETER J.MARSHALL HELENE M.ZAZULAK Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Ordinance No. 2869 - Building Permit Moratorium Applicable to Lot 6 of Tract 12206 Dear Mayor and Members of The Council: We represent Mr. Ken Moody, the owner and developer of Lot 6 of Tract 12206 ("Lot 611) , located at the southerly end of Moody Circle. On August 25, 1986, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2869 ("Ordinance") as an urgency ordinance prohibiting the issuance of building permits for Lot 6 for a period of forty-five (45) days. The adoption of that Ordinance was without notice and hearing. i Subsequently, on October 6, 1986, the City Council, over the objection of Mr. Moody and despite the recommen- dation of City staff not to extend the Ordinance, neverthe- less voted to extend the Ordinance for a period of ten months and fifteen days. The City Council reviewed the matter on November 17, 1986 and decided to take no further action at that time. We hereby request that the City Council, at its next regularly scheduled meeting, take all steps necessary to repeal the Ordinance. We are requesting that the City Council repeal the Ordinance on the basis that: (1) there is no immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare which would result from the issuance of building permits for Lot 6; (2) the Ordinance by imposing a moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot 6 constitutes an unreasonable and unlawful discrimination against our client and Lot 6 and deprives our client of his ability to develop his property in accordance with prior City approvals; and (3) the continued imposition of a moratorium on the issuance of M5' IT?RICK,JACKSON DEMARCO&PECKENPAUGH Honorable Mayor and Members of The City Council January 12, 1987 Page 2 building permits for Lot 6 is detrimental too and is causing damage to our client because of his inability to develop the property. We therefore, request that the City Council, if necessary, schedule the matter for public hearing at its next regularly scheduled City Council meeting and repeal the Ordinance. We reserve the right to present further written and oral testimony prior to and at the time of the City Council discussion on this matter. 7Very t ly yours, vid L. Colg�n DLC:cam cc: Mayor Jack Kelly Mayor Pro Tem John Erskine Council Member Wes Bannister Council Member Thomas Mays Council Member Ruth Finley Council Member Peter Green Council Member Grace Winchell Gail Hutton, Esq. , City Attorney Mr. Charles Thompson, City Manager Mr. James Palin, Planning Director Mr. Kenneth Moody J• 4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH w►e.�-�-�K'� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMU ON HUNTtNCTON BEACH To Charles W. Thompson o James W. Palin, Director City Administrator Development Services Subject MOODY CIRCLE MORATORIUM Date November 17, 1986 ITEM H-1 Development Services staff has received two letters, one from Mr . Moody and one from Mr . Broberg, describing the development parameters necessary for economically rerouting Moody Circle through Broberg's property for each individual property owner . Staff cannot support either one of the outlined proposals and therefore maintains the position of a development layout with 39 units on Broberg' s property, based upon 29 allowed plus 7 density bonus, and 3 transferable rights from Moody's Lot #6. JWP:SH:kla ( oo'92d ) 41. • _ 17'8G �o�Mc CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH vo cc*4`1 INTER DEPARTMENT COMMU ON D•S`ust�oY' .{. ,r.. HUNTINGTON BEACH „O aL'�10Y1 To Charles W. Thompson o James W. Palin, Director City Administrator ,� Development Services Subject MOODY CIRCLE MORATORIUM i Date No 17 , 1986 ITEM H-1 Development Services staff has received two letters , one from Mr . Moody and one from Mr . Broberg, describing the development parameters necessary for economically rerouting Moody Circle through ?r`berg 's property for each individual property owner . Staff cannot support either one of the outlined proposals and therefore maintains th-e position of a development layout with 39 units on Broberg ' s property, based upon 29 allowed plus 7 density bonus, and 3 tfansferable rights from Moody IS Lot #6. JW : SH. k!a 1 6,692)d ) % �NOV i2 : 29 \il M.M. BEVEL. \TO: HUNT I NGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT DATE: 1 1-17-8 MESSRS: JIM PALEN/SCOTT HESS FROM: JACK PROBERS RE: BOLSA CHICA/MOODY CIRCLE PROPERTIES SITE DEVELOPMENT. IN DISCUSSIONS WITH KEN MOODY REGARDING THE FEASAB I L I T`, OF ACQUIRING HIS LOT 6 FOR INCLUSION I N THE L?E'.'ELOPMENT PLr !-y O!''•+ MY TWO ACRE R PARCEL THE FOLLOWING POINTS OF TENTATIVE AGREEMENT ARE: j — N THE SUGGESTED PRICE FOR LOT _ WITH THE EST. C'DST'S FOR THE ROADWAY ANE LA MD OR SUCH PUPPOSES WILL REQUIRE AT LEAST 45 UN17S. --_. '!—!G. FOREG[• I:j[,; ASSLifjE'= THAT REQUIREMENTS..JT 111UtJ!--'- ALLOW ._. UNITS TN TERMS OF PARvING. SPACING, I.;_ .ham:J U M.; ETC. — THAT TIME IS THE ESSENCE AS , HAS BEEN SINCE JUL r THAT THIS PROBLEM STARTED AND AS: YOUR AWARE ' = A VERN COFTL... . PROCEIS TO DATE. A— ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE OF THREE jNITS ON MP. MDODV ' S 1RALT 1220a IF FEAB I BLE 15 REQUIRED, November 17, 1986 HUNTINGTON� c`Ar FLOP! ` DEV �:;�r�1 G TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council P. 0. B 190 FROM: Ken Moody Huntington Beach, CA 9264,, RE: PEARCE STREET MOODY CIRCLE SITE DEVELOPMENT TRACT 12206 It has always been my position and understanding that Moody Circle should intersect with Pearce Street and all traffic generated by the development of Tract 12206 would ingress and egress onto Pearce Street . I support this circulation pattern as I have throughout the entitlement process for my development. It is my understanding that this is in accord with the preferred circulation pattern by both Development Services and Public Works Departments . The change from a public street to a private street would require changes in home owner association CC&R' s to provide maintenance for the private street . This would also concern the eight current property owners and their families . I have sold eight of the eleven lots to other individuals and I have no control over these properties. Any closure of Moody Circle will effect these people (32 families ) . In the alternate, with reference to Mr . Broberg's letter dated November 13, 1986 , I offer the following clarifications and comments : Item 1 : It should be clearly understood that Mr . Broberg would be responsible for all street improvements on lot 6, all engineering costs, tract map revisions of right-of-way, the installation of the gate , extensions of utilities , legal costs , all costs for city, county and state for processing entitlements and amended maps and all other improvements required by the city . I would agree with Mr . Broberg ' s costs for improvements (described above) , purchase of lot 6, and legal documentation preparation would require at least 45 units on Mr . Broberg ' s parcel . This would include incorporating lot 6 into the Broberg parcel . Item 2 : I agree Item 3 : I agree Item 4 : I agree with the provision that the three additional units would be provided on lots 8 , 9 and 4 Tract 12206 without further entitlement or consideration; further , provided that all required parking - where parking is not accommodated on site - shall be accommodated on Moody Circle (private street ) . Ken Moody +_—.� �,3,g..,n _-.�..--��� z:a=�..-:���a+.v .;.�,:�?tq.:arc:-ry.�++#•..s.ffy�L.... .�►'-z`ssc'._ - - _ _ - _ >�! CITY, OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION-, 'POW0IW _. S - 1�+rC y ry �/� MQOA y To TOM LIVENGOOD From GAIL HUTTON Chairman, Planning Commission City Attorney �D ' Subject Moody Circle Date August 14 , 1986 Since the last meeting of the planning commission, this office has been besieged with citizens inquiries regarding Moody Circle. First, Mr . Moody came in declaring that he had been defamed. He supplied a tape of the meeting. No defamation appeared on the tape supplied. He must have been defamed at another time. Next , I received an RLS from James Palin regarding a request from the Planning Commission to bring a restraining order against Moody because of certain alleged bootleg conversions in properties at Moody Circle, which properties are in the hands of subsequent owners . The restraining order would be against Ken Moody to prevent some sort of future criminal violations (bootleg conversions ) or to delay construction on lots where building permits are already issued pending some change in the law . I cannot comply. This office only brings litigation at the behest of the City Council . Thus, it takes " four votes" before I will bring an action. There are a few exceptions to this policy not relevant here . Neither the City Administrator, any individual councilperson, the Mayor , or any Department Head has the power to control litigation. This is a charter duty of the council itself . Thus, your request should properly go to the council . If the council , by minute order , requests a restraining order on Mr . Moody or others , I will review the request. After I received the RLS from James Palin, I received a memo from him wherein it was stated that there were no real violations in the Moody Circle four-plex units . No actionable ones at least. (Copy attached. ) The homeowners seem to have as their real objection the street alignment and traffic patterns . Perhaps I have missed the point on what the commission feels should be done here, what is wrong or what the issue is that is so troublesome to so many. However , it is quite impossible merely to pull a validly issued building permit or to enjoin its use merely because irate neighbors no matter how many or how vocal are disturbed by the permit or its use. Frequently, a property owner will request a building permit for the use of property which may be in conflict with a contemplated change in land use. Government Code S65858 authorizes the - adoption of an interim ordinance prohibiting such use pending a r 4 - -^s - TOM LIVENGOOD August" 4,'-"1986 - - - _ _- Page 2 -' proposed study of the problem. . Rather than an injunction which no court is going to grant under these facts, the Planning Commission might suggest the Council adopt a Government Code S65858 moratorium. Such moratorium could be for study of a specific plan of street alignment or the zoning and are universally upheld. A copy of Government Code 65858 is attached. I EGA HUTTON City Attorney cc: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Planning Commission Honorable Mayor Mandic & Members of the City Council James Palin, Director Development Services Attachment H �dmDEVBLOPMENT SL'SVZCBS; ;= . I r _ 't 4­MOOD `CIRCLE - �Dau +August-7;- 9Tbt! �.'' W .�'''i- -. - a�-- T �..j • �-•-c'_S''L-.. -- +x` — tr'-r•.` £s'c:_'_. _ -.��. �.;-'+~r"".�•'s ..�- - _- _ -r.."`_r:. _ r 4^ - - As requested by theyPlanning Commission,� Development Services staff has inspected the apartment..buildings Aocated on - Moody Circle to determine _if-any zoning violations -presently ezist 'on the site. Listed below are the results- of the=inspections.- 16761 Moody Circle-. 1 . No evidence of -attic areas being used as bedrooms . 2. Recreation room had not been converted to kitchen or additional unit. Recreation room does contain counter tops , sink and cabinets . 3 . Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - 5 16751 Moody Circle 1 . No evidence of attic areas being used as bedrooms . 2. Recreation room had not been converted to kitchen or additional unit. Recreation room does contain counter tops, sinks and cabinets . 3 . Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric -� I 16752 Moody Circle 1 . Presently under construction. No violations were observed by staff during the inspection of the property. 16762 Moody Circle 1 . As of August 6, 1986, this building was not occupied. No violations were observed by staff during the inspection. 2. Number of meters observed gas _ 4 electric 16771 Moody Circle ..on.=i?ai•' -» Presently under -construction:--!-No-violatis obser_ved. v+_aC a 3. a •.:fir.-_ _ __ ant ram!•L '.. _> t �_- - _ _ _ _ _ _ r.SF^C� ww�-. P. IMP Cit PWFIIIII a a v0 - r 16772 Moo y'�"Circe ��'= "�� x.+�-1= x ►=>� -- _ "�'3T��`��s'�^-'�' f`�`►w.''�`- °`���-t--.- _.��`-,:.�rL -y,. -.�.-_.�.••-y.•,..sR�+F -,.. 1. No violati on s were -observed -by staff }during the n pec on = conducted on August 6, 1986. 2. Numberrot "meters observed. gas .y 4 ' electric 16801 Moody Circle 1 . Turning radius for garages located on south side of building -_-"- was 22 feet to temporary wood fence. Property line located _ approximately 2 feet 6 inches ± from temporary wood fences. Turning radius will be approximately 24 feet 6 inches -at such time that southerly property is built out. 2. The attic area was being used as a bedroom by the tenant 's 14 year old daughter . The tenant was requested to immediately relocate the bed to an approved bedroom. The tenant agreed to do so immediately. 3 . No other zoning violations were observed during the inspection of the building . 4 . Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - --' 16802 Moody Circle 1 . Turning radius was taped at 25 feet from outsie dimension of garage door . No violations were observed during the inspection . 2. Number of meters observed: gas - 4 electric - g) A-t�, Records on file in the Department of Development Services do not indicate that permits were issued for the glass enclosures . To rectify this situation, the property owner is required to submit constructin drawings to be reviewed by this department. The structures are required to comply with all codes including setbacks , light, air and ventilations, Title 24 (energy) and open space . MS:kla (5867d) _ _- '�iiia*Gw ar,• - gear zp+ ea � - < .�3t` - K�-�c��gvly,..=,+..ate .�, w. ♦ � ---•-•• - - " � �-t__ .. "'s,,, ���� "'s.-"�.> � ...Y•3-'.—�'•aC�--:ci�t=„ sy. _.�" _.`�y� :.'�"+� �'r..+�etc#+.=�'t �"'�rs�Sss-"+x ,�,- '' Y. �.,.�.�..:�"'--"�`.,�:►-�.__ .� ,r ia,,,,=•f•.,T�: e `: �.�'�. _dam :e_: �'" ���_ ►'�"�"i.�ti"� �',` r'�'�Z1 ..-� ''ate � �" ��� r`.- ��� ,__. - �Fu_?-. y--�S�SS�=r�_-'s''�':.."'�i ,a► re--�L_Y- �+�'1"�'" 'u��=e.m �.�.�"sR�a3�cs`;�.���,,, ��..�- �� November 17, 1986 HUNTINGTON PEACH DEVELOPrr,Er47- Scnb;�Eg TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council �- Huntin P. O. BoA FROM: Ken Moody gton Beach, CA 92646; ' RE: PEARCE STREET MOODY CIRCLE SITE DEVELOPMENT TRACT 12206 It has always been my position and understanding that Moody Circle should intersect with Pearce Street and all traffic generated by the development of Tract 12206 would ingress and egress onto Pearce Street. I support this circulation pattern as I have throughout the entitlement process for my development. It is my understanding that this is in accord with the preferred circulation pattern by both Development Services and Public Works Departments. The change from a public street to a private street would require changes in home owner association CC&R' s to provide maintenance for the private street . This would also concern the eight current property owners and their families. I have sold eight of the eleven lots to other individuals and I have no control over these properties. Any closure of Moody Circle will effect these people (32 families ) . In the alternate, with reference to Mr . Broberg's letter dated November 13, 1986, I offer the following clarifications and comments : Item 1 : It should be clearly understood that Mr . Broberg would be responsible for all street improvements on lot 6, all engineering costs, tract map revisions of right-of-way, the installation of the gate, extensions of utilities, legal costs, all costs for city, county and state for processing entitlements and amended maps and all other improvements required by the city. I would agree with Mr . Broberg 's costs for improvements (described above) , purchase of lot 6, and legal documentation preparation would require at least 45 units on Mr . Broberg' s parcel . This would include incorporating lot 6 into the Broberg parcel . Item 2 : I agree Item 3 : I agree Item 4 : I agree with the provision that the three additional units would be provided on lots 8 , 9 and 4 Tract 12206 without further entitlement or consideration; further , provided that all required parking - where parking is not accommodated on site - shall be accommodated on Moody Circle (private street ) . Ken Moody Page 13 - Council Minutes - A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Green, to offer to settle with State Farm Insurance for $20,000 to settle City's Cros NVOMIMM80the case of Brand vs City - (Claim #84-115 on carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kell aster, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: ABSEN one ACTION TAKEN - MOODY CIRCLE) •.�.—! --The City Clerk presented a communication from the Development Services Direc- tor regarding the moratorium on building permits for Lot #6 - Tract 12206 Moody Circle. The Director of Development Services stated that he had received letters from both Mr. Moody and Mr. Broberg and that they were not in agreement. He recom- mended that the existing ordinance remain in effect until such time as they reach an agreement. Discussion was held between Council and staff regarding the length of the moratorium. By consensus of Council it was determined that no further action was necessary. ORDINANCES ADOPTED On motion by MacAllister, seconded by Bailey, Council adopted Ordi ce Nos. 2870, 2879, 2882, 2883, 2884 and 2885, after reading by tj I the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, ; Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: None ORDINANCE N0. 8 ADOPTED - PROPBBTY MATNAuCB "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICI- PAL�dDE BY AMENDING TITLE 17 ADDING THERBTO NEW CHAPTER 17.10 SECTIONS 17.Y .010 THROUGH 17.10.180 ENTITLED "PROPERTY MAII�ITENANCE." ;y _ ORDINANCE NO. 2879 - ADOPTED - NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS -s� "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLE 971 AND ADDING THERETO ART CI 965 ENTI- TLED "NONCONFORMING PROVISIONS." �- 1 REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date AU;uSt 17,r 19R7 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: ChaFles W. Thompson, City Administrator�� � r Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Directco Community Development Subject: INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 2912 FOR EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR LOT #6 OF TRACT 12206 (LOT AT SOUTHERLY END OF MOODY CIRCLE) Consistent with Council Policy? Q(] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception O z• 1;).9 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: d\ ' STATEMENT OF ISSUE• Transmitted for your consideration is Interim Ordinance No. 2912 for extending the existing moratorium (Ordinance No. 2869) for one year on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) . RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the City Council let the moratorium expire on issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 by not adopting Interim Ordinance No. 2912 based upon the discussion in the Analysis section of this report. ANALYSIS• A. HISTORY OF PEARCE DRIVE/MOODY CIRCLE In 1919 Tract 86 was recorded which established 5-acre parcels with 50 foot wide easements for the benefit of access to each lot (see attached map #1) throughout the Meadowlark Airport area and vicinity. Pearce Drive was one of those easements which has evolved logically into a central access point to Bolsa Chica for development in the area. In 1972, Tract 7805, for 20 single-family residential lots, was developed on one of those 5-acre parcels (see attached map #2) on the north side of Pearce Drive. Tract 9275 for 50 single-family residential lots was subsequently developed in 1976, also on the north side of Pearce Drive. Both subdivisions contained lots fronting Pearce Drive. In 1984, the City Council approved Tentative Tract 12206 (see attached map #3) in conjunction with Conditional Exception No. 84-05 based on recommendations from staff and the Plo 5/85 Planning Commission. Tract 12206 (Moody Circle) was an 11 lot subdivision for development of typical 4-unit apartments on the south side of Pearce Drive. At that time the City Council reviewed two street layouts : one with Moody Circle (see attached map #4) accessing Bolsa Chica (parallel to Pearce Drive) ; and the other as its current configuration (Moody Circle running north-south, terminating at Pearce Drive) . The Public Works Department, Development Services Department, and the Planning Commission recommended the north-south Moody Circle alignment alternative in order to direct the traffic onto Pearce, ultimately onto Bolsa Chica. Pearce Drive is centrally located between Heil and Warner and will eventually be signalized. The other layout onto Bolsa Chica created another ingress/egress point which was highly undesirable on Bolsa Chica, which is designated as an arterial highway. No discussions occurred relative to the adjacent southerly two acre property because at that time it was zoned commercial and would not be integrated with this project. Several people at the City Council meeting spoke in regard to each street layout. Comments in favor of the Moody Circle/Pearce Drive Connection were: 1. Most desirable from a public safety standpoint. 2. Pearce Drive is not used as frequently as Bolsa Chica. 3 . A T-intersection onto Bolsa Chica would cause greater traffic hazards and conflicts on Bolsa Chica. 4 . Awkward access to the site from southbound traffic would be created with the Bolsa Chica access alternative. 5. Cross traffic movement would be necessary into and out of the Bolsa Chica access alternative. 6 . Local street access on west side of Bolsa Chica in similar fashion. Comments against the Moody Circle/Pearce Drive Connection and in favor of the Bolsa Chica/Moody Circle access were: 1. It would eliminate a negative impact of headlight glare to homes on the north side of Pearce Drive at T-intersection. 2. It would eliminate traffic hazards created to children on Pearce Drive. 3 . It would eliminate additional noise on Pearce Drive due to the traffic. 4 . Potential parking problems would not result on Pearce Drive due to insufficient parking on-site and on-street for apartment projects. RCA - 8/7/87 -2- (8801d) 5 . The maximum R2 density allowed in that zone is proposed to be developed which increases traffic and the noise in the vicinity. 6. That Pearce Drive is the only access to the single family residential subdivision and should be limited in use. 7. Apartment developments and single family residential developments utilizing a common street creates conflicts in traffic which should be avoided. During the construction of the apartments on Moody Circle, in early 1986, the adjacent southerly 2 acre site was rezoned from (Q)C4 (Qualified-Highway Commercial) to (Q) R2 (Qualified-Medium Density Residential) . This would permit up to 29 units on the subject property at a maximum density of 15 units per acre; consistent with surrounding R2 zoned parcels. Since the property consisted of two parcels, a "Q" was established to assure an integrated project on both lots . Development plans consisting of Tentative Tract 12756 (Broberg) in conjunction with Conditional Exception 86-44 (see map #5) for an 8-lot subdivision for apartments on the 2-acre site were denied by the Planning Commission on August 6, 1986. Mr. Broberg filed an appeal to City Council. During the development plan review process, concerns were expressed by neighbors relative to the bulkiness of buildings depicted in the conceptual elevations. They requested the development be redesigned as one large project with wide greenbelts, walkways and adequate parking or design the proposed new street to connect to Moody Circle and place a gate at the north end of Moody Circle at Pearce (see comments dated July 11, 1986 on page A55 of November 17, 1986 RCA - attachment #13A) . The neighbors later advocated the Moody Circle realignment alternative since it would alleviate the traffic conditions at Pearce and Moody (see letter dated August 1, 1986 on C-1 of attachment #13C) . During the appeal, the City Council on August 18, 1986 adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 2867 establishing a 45-day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 . The purpose was to allow time for the property owners, homeowners and developers (Broberg and Moody) to evaluate the feasibility of extending Moody Circle southerly through Lot #6, onto an adjacent two-acre site and then route westerly to Bolsa Chica. On October 1, 1986, Mr. Broberg withdrew his appeal request. On October 6, 1986, the moratorium was extended until August 21, 1987. At that time, there were indications from both Moody and the previous property owner of the adjacent two-acre site, Broberg, that optional design layouts for Broberg' s property were being discussed and the Moody Circle realignment feasibility analyzed. Their conclusions were as follows: 1. Change the zoning to R3 on Broberg' s property so it would yield approximately 45 units as opposed to the 29 units currently allowed under the R2 zoning. RCA - 8/7/87 -3- (8801d) 2. A 25 percent density bonus resulting in 7 additional units for Broberg' s property for a total of 36 units was not feasible. 3 . Integrate the area of Lot #6 of the Moody tract with Broberg' s property to achieve an additional 3 units for a total of 39 units was not feasible. 4 . A 25 percent density bonus for one additional unit on four-unit complexes within Moody tract creating three, five-plexes to compensate for the three unit loss on Lot #6 (Broberg' s property would then yield 36 units with density bonus) would be feasible with item #1. 5. No density bonus for Broberg's property and Lot #6 would be used as a connector between Broberg property and Moody Circle was not feasible. On November 17, 1986, staff received from Mr. Moody and Mr. Broberg letters outlining their requirements for realignment of Moody Circle and the number of units necessary to be built on Mr. Broberg's property in order for the project to consummate. In that letter Mr. Broberg indicates that he would have to be allowed to have at least 45 units on his property and that at least 3 additional units be allowed within Mr. Moody' s tract. Mr. Moody responded by saying if that is an option considered by the City Council the following items should be clarified that Mr. Broberg would have to pay for all costs of improvements, revisions to the street, utilities, engineering costs, installation of a gate at the north end of Moody Circle, all legal costs and all costs for processing entitlements and amended maps, and also that in the three additional units granted to Mr. Moody that they be done without further entitlement or consideration and that required parking not accommodated on-site shall be accommodated on Moody Circle as a private street. They did not reach an agreement relaive to these improvement costs. Staff did not support the request for 45 units because it would be too intense for the site. On November 17, 1986, the City Council reviewed the existing Moody Circle moratorium (see p. D-1 of attachment No. 13F) and took no action since both Mr. Moody and Mr. Broberg were not in agreement. No further meetings took place with staff, Mr. Broberg and Mr. Moody. Staff did meet, however, and spoke with Mr. Broberg on various occasions to discuss development options for the two-acre site which included condominium development, apartments, senior citizen housing and possibly a small commercial center. On April 30, 1987, a letter was received from Janet Moody, property owner of Lot #6, indicating she will not sell the property. This created a block to further negotiations (see p. B-1 of Attachment #13B) . As of the end of May, 1987, Harbor Bank became the owner of the adjacent southerly two-acre site. Coultrup Development Company is a perspective buyer of the two-acre site, whose intent is to develop RCA - 8/7/87 -4- (8801d) multiple-family residential . They have devised three development schemes (see attached map #6) for the two-acre site, two of which take into consideration the Moody Circle realignment. Scheme A: depicts a 7-lot subdivision with four-plexes for a total of 28 units on an east-west cul-de-sac street connecting to Bolsa Chica. This layout is similar to the previous 8-lot subdivision (Broberg) except that the buildings are primarily two-story with partial three-story elements. The buildings are adequately separated from one another and it is the least dense of the three proposals . Scheme B: depicts an L-shaped street alignment (Moody Circle) extending south from Lot #6 routing westerly to Bolsa Chica Street. It represents a four-story condominium structure, with parking on the first level with a total of 45 units. Variances indicated for this project would be for height (45 feet is necessary) and to parking. Scheme C: is also depicting an extension of the Moody Circle with an additional section of the street extending easterly to a possible future realignment with Meadowlark Airport. That plan depicts 48 units at four-stories in height which includes parking on the first level and two variance requests relative to height (45 feet) and for reduction in the number of parking spaces . B. EXISTING LAND USES The area south of Pearce Drive and east of Bolsa Chica Street was originally developed as rural residential (homes on overly large lots) . In 1971 the area was rezoned R2 (multiple family residential) because of the amount of undeveloped land, large lots conducive to multiple-family development and proximity to commercial uses. Recently multiple-family development activities (see attached map #7) have increased the normal transitional period (low-density residential recycling to medium-density residential) causing disruption to the single family residential property owners . C. CIRCULATION The original request from Mr. Broberg in August 1986 for an 8-lot subdivision on the two-acre site just south of Moody Circle generated several alternatives (see attached map #8) for possible Moody Circle realignment. Those alternatives basically fell into three categories which the Traffic Division had analyzed as follows: Alternative No. 1 is the original proposal with an east-west cul-de-sac off of Bolsa Chica Street. The Plan would allow right-hand turns into and out of this site from Bolsa Chica only. The amount of generated traffic out of Bolsa Chica at this point is small and poses no significant safety impact on traffic at Pearce. The residents of the new tract would be required to make their turning movement to go south on Bolsa RCA - 8/7/87 -5- (8801d) Chica at the Pearce Street intersection (a U-turn) . However, the small number of generated trips from the tract would not significantly impact that intersection. Alternative No. 2 shows the closing of Moody Circle at the intersection of Pearce Street and re-directs all traffic directly onto Bolsa Chica through the adjacent southerly two-acre site. This would result in a total of 17 lots that have four units each expected to generate 600 vehicle trips daily or 60 in a peak hour period. That level of demand is moderate. We can anticipate demand to permit left turns into and out of the new opening on Bolsa Chica however it is not desirable. In addition, the Pearce Street closure would be more properly done with a cul-de-sac type end treatment. Alternative No. 3 is a plan similar to Alternative No. 2 with the addition of a stub to the east boundary of the new tract to provide for a future connection of the property to the east (Meadowlark Airport) . This proposal would square off the end of the street in anticipation of the new connection. The same comments of Alternative No. 2 would apply to this addition plus the open door option to make a major connection to Bolsa Chica to a point other than at Pearce. It is totally undesirable and unacceptable in terms of traffic operation. The effect of such a connection would be to create a T-intersection with major traffic loading only a short distance south of Pearce intersection with similar traffic loading. That proximity of high use intersections on major arterial highways leads to high potential for driver error due to having several traffic conditions to consider when making movements into and out of the two intersections . Staff maintains the position that Pearce Drive should serve as the main access point from Moody Circle to Bolsa Chica and that establishing multiple intersections along the six-lane, major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety, and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicle on public streets under these conditions. If the adjacent southerly two-acre site is developed with a short cul-de-sac off Bolsa Chica serving 28 units, it will have minimal impact upon Bolsa Chica. D. EXISTING MOODY CIRCLE LAYOUT There are 10 four-unit apartment buildings currently on Moody Circle. At the time the subdivision was proposed an alternative with access off of Bolsa Chica in lieu of the Pearce Street Connection was analyzed. At that time staff recommended that access be off of Pearce instead of Bolsa Chica because it would create another ingress/egress point on Bolsa Chica in close proximity to Pearce Avenue. It was more desirable at that time to have the connection at Pearce rather than Bolsa Chica so that the point of ingress and egress would be through Pearce rather than an additional street on Bolsa Chica. It is staff ' s position at this time to maintain that configuration. When the street alignment was RCA - 8/7/87 -6- (8801d) redesigned to connect to Pearce there were physical designs within the development to make the development as compatible as possible with the adjacent single family subdivision. One instance was to align the street axis so as to prevent exiting vehicles head-lights from glaring on the front windows of the northerly single family homes. In addition, in order to stop thru traffic exiting Moody Circle onto Pearce a stop sign was installed at the northerly end of Moody Circle A perimeter wall was erected around the multiple family subdivision to create a sense of a separate subdivision. Also, red curbing was created on Bolsa Chica to prevent parking on the street. Since the construction of the apartments, Mr. Moody has installed additional landscaping for greater beautification of the development. It is staff 's position that there is not a severe traffic problem at the intersection of Moody Circle and Pearce Street. As an alternative to better direct traffic movement from Moody Circle to Pearce and vice versa a security gate system could be installed towards the northerly end of Moody Circle (see attached map #9) which would better control the amount of traffic going into and out of Moody Circle. This is an alternative that the City Council may consider. E. MOODY CIRCLE REALIGNMENT If the City Council desires to extend the moratorium and pursue a precise plan of street alignment it will necessitate the acquisition of Lot #6 in order to pursue this alignment. Staff would then initiate a precise plan of street alignment for a street to extend through Lot #6 onto the ajoining southerly two-acre parcel extending westerly to Bolsa Chica. When at such time as the adjoining southerly lot is developed that property owner will be required to dedicate the land for this newly created street. F. MEADOWLARK AIRPORT Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2, Area 2. 1, in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 is a request by the Nerio family to redesignate 65 acres, Meadowlark Airport, located on the north side of Warner Avenue, south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street from low density residential to a mixture of low density residential, senior citizen residential, and commercial. Staff is currently processing this request before the Planning Commission which has been reviewed once by them and will be subsequently reviewed again on September 22, 1987; no comments relative to Moody Circle realignment were discussed. Development of Meadowlark Airport will be provided with sufficient access to Warner Avenue and Heil and secondary access to Bolsa Chica via Pearce Street. Access out Pearce from future Meadowlark Airport development will be available but designed to discourage motorists to utilize as a major connector (see map #10) . i RCA - 8/7/87 -7- (8801d) 0 1 1 • In staff' s preliminary evaluation of the traffic circulation for the Bolsa Chica and Pearce area, future build out of these underdeveloped and undeveloped lots combined with existing developments within the R2 zoned area will not cause a measurable traffic impact upon the future Meadowlark Airport development. Staff does not perceive an alignment from Meadowlark Airport to Bolsa Chica through the adjacent two-acre site for traffic access . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS The proposed action is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. The City Council may adopt Ordinance No. 2912 which extends the moratorium for one year; direct staff to initiate a precise plan of street alignment extending Moody Circle southerly through Lot #6 over the abutting southerly property routing westerly Bolsa Chica Street; and direct staff to begin negotiations for acquiring Lot #6 of Tract 12206. B. The City Council may direct staff to work with the homeowners on Moody Circle to install a security gate system designed to control traffic into and out of Moody Circle. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance No. 2912 2 . Map #1 (Original Easements) 3. Map #2 (Tract 7805) 4 . Map #3 (Tract 12206 - Moody Circle) 5 . Map #4 (Alternative Tract 12206) 6. Map #5 (Broberg Subdivision) 7. Map #6 (Coultrup Development Company Layouts) 8. Map #7 (Existing Land Uses) 9 . Map #8 (Possible Moody Circle Realignments) 10. Map #9 (Security Gate System on Moody Circle) 11. Map #10 (Meadowlark Airport Conceptual Circulation Plan) 12. Map #11 (Existing Zone) 13-A. RCA dated November 17, 1986 13-B. Letter from Janet Moody dated April 30, 1987 13-C. Letter from Pearce Street - Residents dated August 1, 1986 13-D. Council Minutes dated August 18, 1986 13-E. Council Minutes dated October 16, 1986 13-F. Council Minutes dated November 17, 1986 13-G. List of property owners on Moody Circle DNL:SH:kla RCA - 8/7/87 -8- (8801d) N0. Z912 WILL ESE TI'�"SOT'�ED AT CC-, . t\irrc::t-, CAL IE N _ DR ' I i FEIL - — . e S E CF - R k` w • w CR . u WAkNEP. MAP wol---4jlLo Ak, FEIL _ - .._ i CA _ COX �T CF - R 1ZZ� MEt•�Dw CA t� ��..�.1.1L Tt �.r4j .• •.:r�L't•11� ' 49 mow,; ; 1 : X44:CR -I 1 1 - •j- p� c19 :n.' 4. t s'� ;R�:.Sils�1 - 1�?r 1�i'4�'/ s<xchl n I a x( -C 41 ^, i -10 77 ------------ ummeft mass* 41' . 1 I � L(sEiDII i. . N, lie --Lj t 411 . a va dt (69 W 'jai 12ea rCe Sf !oS' 16 7 RZ ' 1 3 ND ¢ � 5 , � 80 '� N Balao ° '5000fi ,V U 2log' �9 20, � St r�e�` N 7 N r a` ti0 v BoAo�' e00046 6000O EDOO� G 5' 6 7 ' 27/>8 ' R ACT SOSO wr ,7fDw�• �fta.._ •�: a�rfa.rf!• i�rwN fiica ids o5rl.N►rY ..Ipp/ d 496V— s 1 , ( K-*, Lw p6par M.si, =A 1 I ' suaera ntt 1 `� 'M70 ♦2 "''as AAA l 0 �soom o �- h z m yyco fp 4flwrts � G JY IL.I.� YiALE:1'i4O� - J` 1 I1� i S � ♦Yvr� 4'Nb IL �cl. i� 3 f� t NUNtiMCTON $�/►i�r�� DEMOPMENT SERVICES f�a•- MAY 2 0 � _ P.O. BOX 190 lot_ Hudktgtn Bach. CA 9 ...- MA. 'P* 5 (7- Jo Ap oAWWt bldyd� n3! i ! PAR !�C�2rne � � 'o � o• e e © e e e .V SEY t11�11 ��:•4:•�,�-ikrcr Ism �iM12; clil r P.f9. ei o YG1�1av►t,�S � w � � o y,i9, ���,��;, rlu1� d : rW.; cr IT' J ar . A� •. a :;- i• /.yypyq ••tea = wwALL IDW 1•... � •© 0 ® ® ® I. N t.Ss AC. II �• • f y • Ala lt75 ! AV .r •-�t pLQac y la � sr: � • ,� �, �a A c r LMk, rI, p Apt, V �a +� plea h � - 30. 15 AC. V RJR " PAP a i' P.i j n • t . Q = 5 co oll "—N Q .d Z.Ss AG —� ..�• � :• sue• ,... +�'� 4 � _ _ Nft�RTN �� 29 {ie " WARNER s= AVENUE- rw„vTERSOLM AM J 163- cEsuE tAaE P`•ARCE •CCltrtal l�N • � -ice I •• �Rr��' ' rMr Sri I A c r y L_I r Ir ® I —.� Ise _� i - .8 ALT . .FFI` le 'It 16- ilt 9 A 0 9 A 9 9 ® ®• ® ® O t.RABN d4ffc PrARCE pSdAP �J r"st.tar l.A.r -�-Ifflvr Sri �. 4a. r� I ;.r i �Je— Acr h ' _I t` fn r N ALT m ISM 2 � •r IJ�♦.J .=s -�rR z -4 P_ARCE i solve MIN P a atsemr cosr r/rr sr., �-,Go �0C II! s' W• -1 „j I �� acr c I ALT 7-- i WAOCK&;K V tl l 32 Lvr 2 I LOT ( "• #1 i � a • I k 22.7 R i —.- - - � (,Cf. h rtq carte ''�.� 5-d• y 43="' to="' Iq. x :, for 10 LoT MAP ' S- - il1e i 1, j '�_+J 1: � PEK �✓'; '�PbG,! woman• a Wass iiiiiii :,":OwC::::::C::: 4 r was ; 4. ipt O } • f9} fi FI 211- or jr Too— !F 0 0 o D o c' a: ��a� " 1. © @ Xlh-n 00- a� Age z .. o 2.35 AG. .� rrrr 4 rM �� • �" � . O C 'O Yb •e V - '0 ' -• CIRCLE 0 • 0 o ' � @ i 233 r � 1{ • ` Q O i• j r.o f J / J r ;'� ..� - - b12 _9273 41 : LAJ: _ ~ C r y co . � G n� wwt ,r�s _ I►v�,ob� I� h�� . 13. �. 2. 506 '. C55)I t3 2.92 AG. l2 Jl.w \ �"'J i 1 NI:z .i+ Pe� \//47�'� z9 2B " WARNER �s AVEiVUE f W/NTEr7SBURG AVE.) �^ M " cEsuE caaE ft M.AV.- ,86 M•M• /0-. Page 7 Couac;l Age - 8/1 7/87 , E-2. RESOLUTION NO 5810 - SO CALIFORNIA 4Q?S LEASE SALE #95 Communication from the City m A strator transmitting Resolution No. 5810 prepared staff in response the Call For Information an omination and Not i of Intent to Prepare an Envir mental Impact Sta ent which was issued by the pt. of Interior f Southern California Outer Conti nta1 Shelf (OCS) ase Sale 95. RA: Adopt Res. No 5810 - "A RESOLUT OF THE CITY COUNCI OF THE CITY OF HU GTON BEACH IN RESPONSE T THE CALL FOR INFO . ATION FOR SOUTHERN ALIFORNIA OCS LEA SALE #95" - fo ?; transm' tal to the U. S. pt. of the Inte or , Miner s Management Serv' ce by August 21 , 987. I F . PUBLIC HE NGS - (Procedural hanges noted o attached yellow s ets) F F-1 . PO IC HEARINGS - OPE D & CONTINUED THIS DATE - (NONE ) a 3 F-2 PUBLIC HEARINGS I F-2a . EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM - MO Y CIRCLE - PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE NO 2912 Public hearing on proposed Interim Ordinance No. 2912 - "AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF 3UILDING PERMITS FOR PURPOSES OF FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT. " Proposed Interim Ordinance No. 2912 would extend the moratorium bn building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 ( vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle) for up to one year. RA : Staff recommends that the City Council let the moratorium expire on issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 by not adopting Interim Ordinance No. 2912 based upon the discussion in the analysis section of the report dated 8/17/87. /110r/D� To �DPT 40 110 A?/.-X. AS t9ME*%iF0 FOR, �o—I�i4 y 1o4po 11a/P/!/M Ai9/4 3-2 e;rrskine BAnnl3 kr- Ar-r /MXit T1RI vA( ' EXPIRE bi4�a .q,.q (Woll'AtIf rnty; i9men- &AYENE - 9:.?0 (8/17/87) ( 7) 1'I F WIME 11,1 W min N 1'ICE 0'0 PU HEARING PROPOSED INTERIM 01 WANCE NO. 2912 (EXTENSION OF M011AT RIUM-Moody Circle)' NQTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Bach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Counc(I'Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Cent�r,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California, on the date and at the time!lndicated below to receive 4nd consider the statements of all persons who wish to be hard relative to theapplication described below. f DATA:Monday,August 17, 1987 TIME.7:00 P.M. SUBJECT: Proposed Ir►terim Ordinance No. 2912 - "AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE FOR PURPOSES OF FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT." LOCATION:Lot 6 of Tract 12206(vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody Circle). PROPOSAL:To consider extending the moratoriurrl on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for up to one year. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:Categorically exempt ON FILE:A copy of the interim ordinance is on file in the Department of Community Development Services,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against theapplication as outlined above.All applications,exhibits;and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California,for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON 13EACH'CITY COUNCIL,By:Allcia M.Wentworth,Clty Clerk,Phono(714)5W-3405 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot August 7, 1986 ' F032 .1301 ' V 1 V 0 ® ® 3 ® ® r• / ! C ® ® O AV Jew PEAFrCE. . , l•^.L.. •� 1 ACT Vt, I7 + 16 �4 bvb,le t G .i ,. �..... J y y ♦. RJR sa .. 56 �' 'SS .!I• 13 M•:Y:---- T;,;, AREA MAC 4 �, a J.1J AG. ; a� ='1; �. PAP ♦ i1 PJ V '� 59 •„1q 5 > P-A(.174 «.13.5r J.+�s.c WA NER,��__ = AV£NU£ twwrERJVL" A►�i _ _ I i",rZ?2'. 163- ctsucc�Nt VIP •vt -we M.K 10- Authorl=ed to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County. California. Number A-6214. dated 29 September 1961 and A-21931. dated 11 June, 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Puaoc Notice •o.engvV covered py INS emoevrt ie so .n 7 point mom 10 We cOWmn wicitn I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of Public Hearing of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for one time consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of Aug . 7 198 7 198 198 198 198 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on Aug. 7 , 1987 at Costa 7 a, California. Signature :i h w ) i PROOF OF PUBLICATION Publish 0/7/87 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEUING PROPOSED :INTERIM ORDINANCE NO 2912 (Extension of Moratorium - Moody Circle) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, 'California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, August 17, 1987 TIME: 7:00 P.M. SUBJBCT: Proposed Interim Ordinance No. 2912 - "AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LOT 6 OF TRACT 12206 IN THE VICINITY OF MOODY CIRCLE FOR PURPOSES OF FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT." APPLICANT: LOCATION: Lot 6 f Tract 12206 (vacant parcel at the southerly end of Moody CircW PROPOSAL: To consider extending the moratorium on building permits on Lot 6 of Tract 12206 for up to one year. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt ON FILE: A copy of the interim ordinance is on file in the Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated August 5, 1987 L ® smuaw ® ® ® _ / 2. • O . y / O 1 _ . PEARCr Jrrf 4 ' sty+ •:Cltr[t! Ceti! ; •-- •L �j ( {. ru!i�rir ,+t { Irv! f�: .o .a r 19 'jlS01 {t SIAin ( �. y• F ,!z:�l ir' ® I ACT t r, J I T • 205 i4 , D r AC. itz 15 AC r-Q5A MAP PAR t , P.3 CD Q _AI r, T - Y �. 4 T 46 • ) AA 451 ! ` . � �I I P.dI. !-j/ � Z.is AC. M y +.. � se• - . NORTi't - I WARNER= AVENUE w,n�TFRsBt�G AW) •A } _•; -Ave. 16791 Moody_ Circle #D 146 601 Ol ;:�„� ' Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Occupant Gladus Little 4659 16761 Moody Circle #C Oft Huntington CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16801 Moody Circle #A 146 60011 Huntir�gt�on Beach, CA 92649 Janet T. Moody O Occupant 4641 Los Patos, 16761 t Circle #D Hun Beach, CA 92649 Moody 16801 Moody Circle #B Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Art Tbrosian 5081Cresent Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92707 146 601 10 Harbor Bank Occupant Occupant Judy Leach 16 177 Moody Circle #B 16801 Moody Circle #C Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16400 Pacific Coast Hwy Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Jon Coultrup Occupant Occupant 16771 Moody Circle #A 16801 Moody Circle #D Coultrup Rev. Co. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 3127 E. South St. Ste. B Long Beach, CA 90805 Occupant 16751 Moody Circle #A Occupant 16771 Moody Circle #C Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 occupant 167 15 Moody Circle #B 16O�ant Circle #D 16802 Mt Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Moody 16802 Moody Circle #A Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 occupan t � Occupant 16 917 Moody Circle #A 16751 Moody Circle #C Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Occupant 16761 Moody Circle #A Occupant Huntington Beach, CA 92648 16 197 Moody Circle #B Huntington Beach, CA 92649 occupant Occupant c 16 617 Moody Circle #B 16 197 Moody Circle #C Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 i��762 r ,.c" `_ �::it - '• �82 1rlsa C•�ra ,.,t. #100 Hun�i. vk3ach, CA 92649 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 occupant 146 601 35 16802 Moody Circle #C Occupant Hsu, Robert Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16762 Moody Circle #C 875 Prospect P1. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Occupant 167 Circle #D Occupant 146 601 36 16802 Moody Circle #D Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Nation, Jewell Huntington Beach, CA 92649 4802 Curtis Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 601 12 Occupant 16792 Circle #B 16752 Occupant Circle #A �� Hong-Yen Moody Moody 12020-B Centralia Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Hawaiian Gardens, CA 90716 146 601 14 Occupant 16 927 Moody Circle #C 16677522 upant Circle #B 190021 E, Henryanyon Ichiro r. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Orange, CA 92667 146 601 15 Occupant Occupant atinder 16 927 Moody Circle #D 16752 Moody Circle#C 5 -teauRoy Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Newport Beach, CA 92660 777:: 146 601 15 �"'` 167 25 Moody Circle #D Swaroop� Satinder - 8 Oakmont Ln. -- Huntington Beach, CA 92649Newport Bed, CA 92660 Occupant Quin, Richard v. 146 601 17 16772 Moody Circle #A 2200 Park Newport #401 Hun Beach, CA 92649 �'� Willson Huntington Newport Beach, CA 92660 2062 Business meter Dr. 146 601 20 Suite 105 Irvine, CA 92715 Occupant 146 601 21 146 601 18 16772 Moody Circle #B Horton, Irene M. Browning, Mark H. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 20661 Suburbia Ln. 16771 Roosevelt St. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Occupant 146 601 23 146 233 02 16772 Moody Circle #C Law, Jan Carbone, Gerald E. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 168U Roosevelt St. 5111 Stallion Cir. i Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Occupant 146 601 24 146 233 03 16762 Moody Circle #A Nerio, Masao Thoupson, Donald B. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 9340 Bolsa Ave. 5091 Stallion Cir Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 J • 146 'CA 26 1,mv Han, William M. 16671 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 04 146 233 03 146 233 27 Stephens, Michael L. Chirco, Samuel R. Dannis, Wanda Irene 5071 Stallion Cir 5801 Stallion Cir. 16681 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 06 146 233 17 146 233 28 Burns, Robert C. De Wenter, David J. Tuck, Samuel C. 5061 Stallion Cir 16692 Parlay Cir. 16691 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 07 146 233 18 146 233 29 Childress, Robert L. Bayarres, Walter M. Halden, John F/ P.O. Boas 609 16682 Parlay Cir. 16692 Graz Cir. Stillwater, CK 74076 Beach, CA 92649 az&rngton Beach, CA 92649 146 233 08 146 233 19 146 233 30 Della Penna, Domenico Calcagno, John Floyd, Gerald D. 5031 Stallion Cir 16672 Parlay Cir. 16682 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 09 146 233 20 146 233 31 Peterson, K Russell Shideler, Roger W. Astle, Robert M. 5021 Stallion Cir 16662 Parlay Cir. 16672 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 13 Southern Californiz Acro Heddon, Merrill H 146 233 21 5822 Research DR. 16661 Parlay Cir. Ramirez, Salvador F. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16642 Parlay Cir. 146 233 32 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 14 146 233 22 146 233 33 Kim, Tae J. Iceman, James R. Flora, David M. 16671 Parlay Cir. 16632 Parlay Cir. 16642 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 15 146 233 23 146 233 34 St John, Eric M. Meyers, Ronald D. Hackworth, Robert W. 16681 Parlay Cir. 16631 Graz Cir. 16632 Graz Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 16 146 233 24 146 233 35 Davis, William L. Connors, Charles E. Nerio, Dick Y P.O. Baas 8157 16641 Graz Cir. 16631 Roosevelt In. Weslaco, TX 78596 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 a mti gton Beach, CA 92649 146 233 25 146 233 36 Adams, Eugene P. Haugland, William H. 16661 Graz Cir. 16641 Roosevelt ff mting� Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 .2 36 23 4i' 2v3 6- A"Ir-dby, William F. Ubradovi:-Jti, Michael }, 0 e Oat 16661 Roosevelt Ln. 5031 Pearce Lam. 5142 Stallion Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Mach, CA 92649 146 233 38 146 233 49 146 233 61 Benadcm, John R. Mdintyre502 Pearce Dr. 5141 Gelding Cir. 166ti Roosevelt , Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 �'On 146 233 39 146 233 50 146 233 62 Mc Cann, Donald S. Le, Pao Ping Mac Farlane, Gary W 16681 Roosevelt Ln. 5011 Pearch Dr. 5151 Gelding Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 40 146 233 52 Pickett, David L. 16691 Roosevelt Ln. ��, Phillip J• 1146 233 63 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 5151 Stallion Car. Graham, Richard L. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 5161_Gelding Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 41 146 233 53 Guest,DrahoJ. Betty B. 146 233 64 16701 Roosevelt L, Chester Ln. 21372 Augusta Ave. Perkins. Robert 6701 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 5171 Gelding Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 42 146 233 54 7ma®ara, Akira Brady, John E. 16721 Rooseveltl Ln. 5171 Stallion Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Beach, CA 92646 146 233 43 146 233 55 146 233 65 Carrothers, Eugene A Mac Milliam, James any' Robert 5091 Pearce St. 5181 Stallion Cir 5181 Gelding Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Fhuitingbon Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 246 233 44 146 233 56 Puttner, Werner W. Crespin, N A 146 233 66 5081 Pearce Dr. 5182 Stallion Cir. Bowers, Ralph F. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 5182 Gelding Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 45 146 233 57 146 Walker, William D. Bauman, Robert H. Ell 233 67 Es, Richard D. 5071 Pearce Dr. 5172 Stallion Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington 5172 gtonl ng Beach, CA 92649 146 233 46 146 233 58 Hawksford, Charles 146 233 68 Springer, Wayne K. 5162 Stallion Car. 5061 Pearce Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 5162 Gelding William J. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 5162 G H�mtington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 47 146 233 69 Marshott, Frank N. 146 233 59 Rovs, Ronald Et 5051 Pearce Dr. Mc Keating, Alan 5152 Geld ng Cyr. Huntjp too Beach, CA 92649 5152 Stallion Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 23 70 433 814 21 f,-:k-rccls, Jacqueline 49396 F rog- =• -49 r, Howard 704.E Start J.ght Cir it �.i i gicach. iA 92649 Hunti.ngtoni Beach, CA`92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 71 933 810 11 Clark, David C Garcia' Fxliardo 933 810 22 5462 Bankton Ddr- 5141 Pearce Dr. Kelly,Huntington � CA 92649Kelly, MatthMatthew� Huntington Beach, CA 92649 4982 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 72 933 810 12 Yacono, Nathan Plechner, Carol 933 810 23 9746 Prichard St 4942 Pearce Warren, George Bellflower, CA 90706 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 2604 S. Border Corona, CA 91720 146 233 73 933 810 24 GUstafson, John 933 810 13 Valov, Rate Thurman, Debra P.O. Boot Ill Ralpakoff, Rarer 361 Canada Sambre Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4946 Pearce St. La_Havra, CA 90631 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 74 933 810 14 933 810 25 Dalsimer, Christopher Nerio, Art M �-f„mac-ter, Louis 4992 Pearce St 9340 Bolsa Ave. 18542 Pueble Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 146 233 75 933 810 15 933 810 01 Erickson Robert Le �, Raymond ��, Tom 4892 Pearce 5121 Stallion Cir. 4952 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Beach, CA 92649 146 233 77 933 810 16 933 810 02 Trotter, Janes Huang, Gloria Herbold, Albert 5141 Stallion 4440 Ironwood 16128 Tortola Cir Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Huntington Wach, CA 92649 146 233 79 933 810 17 933 810 03 Guest, Daniel Goeke, Robert Nielsen, Terry 16621 Parlay Cir 88 Seton 4898 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Irvine, CA 92715 Beach, CA 92649 146 233 933 810 18 933 810 04 Treaayne, Mark Ellis, Kathleen Lally, Heanne Marie 16631 Parlay Cir. P.O. Box 102 4902 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Sunset Beach, CA 90742 Beach, CA 92649 146 233 81 933 810 19 933 810 05 Bercovici, Isac Pitti, Tomas Hama, Allen 16641 Parlay P.O. Box 21873 4906 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Long Beach, CA 90801 HtuYtin9tanBeach, CA 92649 .., 933 810 06 933 810 20 gpstien, Lester Viscetto, Emilie 4908 Pearce 13316 NE 138th Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Kirkland, WA, 98034 933 810 07 A. Yuan Curley, Robert 16772 Moody Cir. #D 4912 Pearce Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 933 810 08 Michael Tu Frantz, Michael 2137 S. Anchor St. 4916 Pearce Anaheim, CA 92802 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Eisennan 2069 Boa Vista Dr. Coster Mesa, CA 92626 J. Marian 16751 Moody Cir. #D Huntington Beach, CA 92649 T. Hockschild 4841 Curtis Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Little & Anderson 3651 Pirate Cir. Huntiongtan Beach, CA 92649 D. Andrews 5901 Warner #352 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 S. Sukhu 22882 Via Genoa South Laguna, CA 92677 R. Allison 2126 E. 7th St. Long Beach, CA 90804 Chang Rang 16792 Moody Circle #A Huntington Beach, CA 92649 y 4e `, I��e y,`r + �, 1.,, �Z L'��i� }i ,i {.u�. 1� r�l y� r, ri I,7 }EL i�T, �1�,• * ix; +� � E11M � 1,� r ��f F►i•� `�f ail; R RAsr A+1 R'f +��FM+M+M M 4M0'1hq M R AN •e i, i .1 101WINT Oavwi#f 004A 111nrtl/NIO11 RRACM CRIT , . .S'�..i1r'w. :,•f jl=m�l PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ Outten$ ZI► PARCEL NO/ ONNlR$ ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME. AND ADDRESS COOK TR I 246-601-20 QUINEs RICHARD V 46-601-27 WINCHICA CUMMUNT1Y WATER 146-601-34 If A T PROPERTIES 04-007 2200 PARK NEWPORT 8401 04-007 CO 04-007 NEWPORT BEACH, CAL 92660 BOLSA9^41 el �' �• ---. Cll1 A CO W d 7� T (" ACH, CAL 907 ft4 92.C�49 6-601-21 HORTONs IRENE M 146-601-28 OPPOLZER ' t ?CTfA 146-601-3S HSU, ROBERT Y M 4-007 20661 SUBURBIA LN 04-007 7KASTE ' ; :ibERT F 04-007 87S PROSPECT PL I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 P 0 X 510 COSTA MESA, CA 19261449 KA► CA 96097 146-601- J 146-601-29 CROSSLEY, SIO A 146-601-36 NATION, JEWELL Ck-007 48 IR 04-007 1055 RO5 E 04-007 4802 CURTIS CIR ' UNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 PAL RINGS, CAL 92262 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 146-601-23 LAN, JAN 146-601-30 BREUER-HARRISON INC 146-601-37 HATION, JEWELL 04-007 16811 ROOSEVELT ST 04-007 BREUER, 04-007 4802 CURTIS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 175 ERA VISTA OR HUNTIN EACH, CA 92649 F LERTON, CAL 92631 1k5-bC1-24 NERIO, MASAO 146-601-31 CROSSLEY, SI A 148-011-01 STATE OF C T Of 34-007 9340 SOLSA AVE 04-007 1055 RO E 04-001 PUBL RKS WESTMINSTER* CAL 92683 PA PRINGS, CAL 92262 146-60.1-25 CHANG, 'ENRIQ 146-601-32 BANK, ORANGE Y 148-011-02 HILLS LAND Z WA -04-007 3922 5 DR 04-007 2730 E AN "E 04-001 WYNNs CA ,L1LMfTNG70N BEACH, CA 92649 ORA , CA 92669 417 LL ST STA 924 ./! ANGELES, CAL 90013 146-601-26>WALTE�RsD 146-601-33 VAUGHN, ROB 148-011-03 ORANG NTT FLOOD 04-007 04-007 1137 E OA BLVO 04-001 C OL DISTNGTON BEACH, CA 92647 BA ISLANDs CA 92661 I Iv A.y'`3�.'t Y�;7tr Y 4'• '� .{b ISM k Y e. i IVA f i—e� K". rs�'2 �kl 1l iYIR�i;' :Cr�.r?: ,`a�, L�� `; 1. " miTtoP'1 OR d xr ,2U 1—f. h M GTOM 8EA'C!*r d64iS 0 *, " e wA a ROW oto GAL CPO f ' r,a+�r.�.,ry,'4?�;,_ aD�,," '��-�P 3^R d! ',MOOb X• •'� .�` � ' �4 b-�'E.�•W.i S $�At},9D�tP r �3K:`:', '.'y�.:, ,� ° fir C' FE I r4 ,w,w T , �� -501 t rA 13^oer JAB fir +, M E: a �'�' '+..a ,,� Y, y,(�.. ' :.'.... a �+'*' r :.•'iC 33 r` �'4�{" p ' ".'3tr�.;"�•�`';i ,'��'� -:. � r;�[;+f'f�S4it7s.`r64 w"�II6� "?� �ic,c?,Gi� ,..€ram"FY'�{q`.r' .,r' . . � I V)0'-SC z s!: AL A;+e {4'� 'U+s 1E A -1, I Ci•A.R:.i6li,�,ivRti,. �+'e-007 '�'a�r• ,. � 04 :Z-a • 10$, •SENT OR .�� P,re '00r E4)62_ i#RIAE'$S-,CEIvTEP4 ;'• ARVINtv CA HOPOY 4 T-� r,,A44 601 aa_8R0i1Niap Rx7 .,..., ,w.. ...w 'Ck � r M11RIS tlal4`0 ', C4-00r +i 4, i PAT E 6:-Au.' l�7TI " VEL '+, SIr IiS:, bait r C' 4 a , W4 k "i eiALPit XONG IM 0 :46-6A1-19 }IJt)r Hb?ti YEN r�►4. MONd$ Al�B 'aa 0K OR Af a IIAFIa.IIA=3 6"; r,fi 907r.� ° 1 : .• E CA fib. a F. GR1lA NR� . F i 4yr G ';, + �r 1,, 1 '11 i irY.r dA r�l` t ,1 i 'f ,'i .ri il r .1, 1�+.1j .�i, ICI�;.� '� ri•r+ 'r1 ' `6T',W,j IM M! rip �d �� w..+ w ` ' 1 I 27.tOBQIr* M�M11,11*, �„�r w,n.,,,.w,�.w w�.6d, PARCEL NO/ OWNERS tZP PARCEL NO/ i20 'ARCtL MO/ OWMlQS ' r''' wto 21MA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME AND ADO ESS CODE IRA NAME ANO AOORtSO I 00 �46-241-23 SARKARIA, DALJIT 146-221-32 MATINAS, STRATT N J 146-221-39 YEE, GARY W 04-097 P 0 BOX 5986 04-007 17081 GREENTRE LN 04-007 9031 WENDY CIR ORANGE, CAL 92667 HUNTINGTON BE No CA 92649 FOUNTAIN VLY, CAL 91706 i 146-221-26 DIVERSIFIED S OPPING 146-221-33 MATINAS, ST ATTON J 146-221-40 PATEL, ISHWAR THAKOR 04-007 CENTERS O4-007 17081 GREE REE LN 04-007 P 0 BOX 656 • 2910 RED HI AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 WESTMINSTER, CA 92683. SUITE 200 COSTA MESA CA 92626 146-221-27 LEON6, DO GLAS H 146-221-34 BARRON, OLOMON 146-221-41 CHANG, YU WEN 04-007 8853 SAN PIPER CIR 04-007 360 S E CLIO AVE 1225 04-007 30136 AVE DE ALMA FOUNTAIN VLY, CAL 92708 PASAOE A, CA 91101 RANCHO PALO VERDES, CAL 90274 i '•;rt-r2t�1-28 LITRI , ROBERT MILLAN 146-221-35 SAIT A, GEORGE N 146-221-42 LOUGHN E, PATRICK V t' `,4-AA7 16452 BARNSTABLE CIR 04-007 179 1 DENVALE CIR 04-007 XPOWE COURT INV, CO HUNT GTON BEACH, CA 92649 HU INGTN BCH, CAL 92649 8071 LATER AVE 9200 HUNT NGTON BEACH, CA 92647 Mv-221-29 U NO, MARINO 146-221-36 WAN, CHEUK S 146-221-43 RAN, DIEN VAN 04-007 P BOX 5214 04-007 /.6881 LOS AMIGOS CIR 04-007 24892 PASEO VENDAVAL 6 ROEN GROVE, CA 92645 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 EL TORO, CA 92630 146-221-30 MC EWEN, JAMES E 146-221 37 VUKAS, PETER M 146- 21-44 MONTEMER, CRESENCIA 6 04-007 1702 S FRIES AVE 04-00 3261 LAMA AVE 0 -007 16502 REGINA CIR it WILMINGTON, CAL 90744 LONG BEACH, CA 90808 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-221- 1 LONG, GERALD W 146- 21-38 WHETSELL, HARIL E 146-233-02 CARBONE, GERALD E e.-00 18151 LAKEPOINT LN 04 007 7291 TOULOUSE OR 01 04-007 5111 STALLION CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 z �#'Sr 1 ( .� 1. I r. i i � I 1 n Yr�11i 4' <� , 1 �Y�}'�rry� 'ir ��ifjA`,•,'�i EMI��.1,�. i�tA/��y,ee •� 1., yll., , r .,:!I�1 �rd t'I,iy+'r1 !t' J 11 1 . .It li '1 r.l��f Y�l� �. r PARCEL NO/ ONNER3 LIP PARCEL NO/ dHHlwa air rAftcaL HO/ TRA NAME AND ADDRE33 CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA, NAMt AMU AOORa%f I COOL '[Y46-233-03 THOMPSONs DONALD 8 , L J 46-233-10 SHIDELER, ROGER W 04-007 5092 STALLION CIR 04-007 16661 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16662 PARLAY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 4 .46-233-04 CHIRCOs SAMUEL R 146-233-14 KIMs TAE J 146-233-21 RAMIREZ, SALVADOR F 4-007 5081 STALLION CIR 04-007 16671 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16642 PARLAY CIR P HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 � 146-233-05 STEPHENS, MICHAEL L 146-233-15 ST JOHN, ERIC M 146-233-22 LEMON, JAMES R SR AO-007 5071 STALLION CIR 04-007 16681 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16632 PARLAY CIR ,a HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 Y a 233-06 BURNSs ROBERT C 146-233-16 DAVIS, WILLIAM L 146-233-23 MEYERS, RONALD 0 . 1 M i,-007 5061 STALLION CIR 04-007 P 0 BOX 8157 04-007 16631 GRAZ CIR •t HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 WESLACO, TX 78596 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 9CA9264 4 146—F'.3-07 CHILDRESS, ROBERT L 146-233-17 DE WENTERs DAVID J 146-233-24 CONNORS, CHARLES E r 04-007 P 0 BOX 609 04-007 16692 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16641 GRAZ CIR STILLWATER# OK 74076 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 1 I146-233-08 DELLA PENNA, DOMENICO 146-233-18 BAYARRESs WALTER M 146-233-25 ADAMS, EUGENE P 94-007 5031 STALLION CIR 04-007 16682 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16661 GRAZ CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-233-09 PETERSON, K RUSSELL 146-233-19 CALCAGNO, JOHN 46-233-26 FLANNIGAN, WILLIAM M 047007 5021 STALLION CIR 04-007 16672 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16671 GRAZ CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 re '� 2Y� • 16 PARCEL ND/ O"HgN5 ZIP PARCEL NO/ Naas alp PARCat, NO/ 0141A& S "' I " "' 'i•,=Z�} TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COD! A NAME- NO ADDRESS CODE TRA NAMS AND ADOUSSS t QpOR,,, 1„1 146-.2r33�-27 DANNIS, WANDA IRENE 146-233-34 HACKWORTII, ROBERT W 146-233-41 DRAHOS, CHESTER J 04-007 16681 GRAZ CIR 04-007 26632 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16701 ROOSEVELT LH HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 33-28 TUCK, SAMUEL C 146-233-35 NERIO, DICK Y 146-233-42 IMAMURA, AKIRA .007 26691 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16631 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 16721 ROOSEVELT LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 144- 233-29 HALDEN, JOHN F JR 146-233-36 HAUGLAND, WILLIAM H JR 146-233-43 CARROTHERS, EUGEN( A. ffi;-007 16692 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16641 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 5091 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 ^? e ` Y ;t •233-30 FLOYD, GERALD D 146-233-37 MULCAHY, WILLIAM F 146-233-44 PUTTNER, WERNER W 44-007 26682 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16661 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 6082 PEARCE DR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 46-233-31 ASTLE, ROBERT M 146-233-38 BENADOM, JOHN R 146-233-45 WALKER, WILLIAM D -007 16672 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16671 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 5071 PEARCE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 � .41,4-233-32 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACRO 146-233-39 MC CANN, DONALD S 146-233-46 SPRINGER, WAYNE K 04-007 TEAM INC 04-007 16681 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 5061 PEARCE DR 5822 RESEARCH OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-233-33 FLORA, DAVID M 146-233-40 PICKETT► DAVID L 146-233-47 MARSHOTT, FRANK N 047007 26642 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16691 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 5051 PEARCE OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649,,; .; 4 'I i .li {: ��'i, � f.,i r ,J,. t I � tA I � r r .�,. t i 1+.1.+.:� rA :f �hf�, rr ,, +1(.;MF{.f 1��1�, 4;itil�Md,,��'?�'+1}I �Sy�• •A�. rf.,ii. i 1 I t' r 1 .I�I p''�ri YL A�'.,7l,r, NUM„�4. MrAI� .*...,,,r.�,�„ or•mow ♦,•. PARCEL NO/ OMNERS !iP PARCEL NO/ OMNtRf ti► ►ARCM NO/ 1� A OwNrR• fit'+.;"; , TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NA E TRA NAM! ANO AOORL>rf ','' C00%' 146-233-48 OBRADOVICH, MICHAEL L 146-233-56 CRESPIN, N A 146-233-63 GRAHAM, RICHARD L 04-007 5031 PEARCE DR 04-007 5182 STALLION CIR 04-007 5161 GELDING CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 � 6-233-49 MCINTYRE, DAVID 146-233-57 BAUMAN, ROBERT H 146-233-64 PERKINS, ROBERT J 4-007 5021 PEARCE DR 04-007 5172 STALLION CIR 04-007 5171 GELDING CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 M M 146-233-50 LE, PAO PING 146-233-58 HAWKSFORD, CHARLES L 146-233-65 PENNY, ROBERT A ' qg 04-007 5011 PEARCH OR 04-007 3162 STALLION CIR 04-007 5181 GELDING CIR 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 t HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 0 •v-233-52 DYSKOW, PHILLIP J - 146-233-59 MC KEATING, ALAN 146-233-66 BOWERS, RALPH F s4-007 5151 STALLION CIR 04-007 5152 STALLION CIR 04-007 5182 GELDING CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 t 146-233-53 GUEST, BETTY B 146-233-60 NGUYEN, OAT HOANG 146-233-67 ELLIS, RICHARD D i• 64-007 E1372 AUGUSTA AVE 04-007 5142 STALLION CIR 04-007 5172 GELDING CIR A HUNTINGION BEACH* CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92642 146-233-54 BRADY* JOHN E 146-233-61 MC FARLAND, WILLIAM L 146-233-68 HONEYMAN, WILLIAM J 04-007 5171 STALLION CIR 04-007 5141 GELDING CIR 04-007 5162 GELDING CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-233-55 MAC MILLAN, JAMES 146-233-62 MAC FARLANE, GARY W 146-233-69 ROTS, RONALD E "14-.007 5181 STALLION CIR 04-007 5151 GELDING CIR 04-007 5152 GELDING CIR { HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 42649 i Ir':pr(1'�.M}y ' '•IN a•r�1�•rlr I I r. ,•rl •�'. ��,.�, I I'� I t ra yY'r II r.,� wA �.,' I,. ,rlltp l �lrr� 9,fY/M fY:1 N,/N�IMr ram.,♦ ,r rrrrr ,rr�,y„ •��br, � •1 • ,VANCEL NO/ ONNERS ZSP PARCEL NO/ DNflap• Zip rAMtttt NO♦ DMNtO� EM'`}i1 C11„ TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAM[ AND ADONS60 COOL ; 246-233-70 EDWARDS, JACQUELINE L 146-233-77 TROTTER, JAMES H 146-241-26 NERTO, MASAO 04-007 7041 STARLIGHT CIR 04-007 5141 STALLION CIR 04-007 9340 BOLSA AVE br HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 WESTMINSTER, CAL 9Y683 , . 9 1.46-233-71 CLARK, DAVID C 146-233-79 GUEST, DANIEL J 146-251-02 KRUMME, STANLEY E 04-007 5141 PEARCE OR 04-007 16621 PARLAY CIR 04-007 KRUMME, CHRISTIN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 16741 DIANE LN HUNTINGTON SEA , CA 92647 C i4,i-233-72 YACON09 NATHAN N 146-233-80 TREMAYNE, MARK D 146-251-03 MOHULSKI, ST PHEN T k iT.3-007 9746 PRICHARD ST 04-007 16632 PARLAY CIR 04-007 18217 FALLE LEAF CIR BELLFLOWER, CA 90706 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 FOUNTAIN V LLEY, CA 92708 i . � 1.0+6-233-73 GUSTAFSON, JOHN 146-233-81 BERCOVICI, ISAC 146-251-04 HAGGARD PAUL A 04—PO7 P 0 BOX 111 04-007 16641 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16761 ANE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTI TN BCH, CAL 92647 t . I•r 146-233-74 NERIO, ART M 146-241-23 HERIO, MAS 146-251-05 RE D, ROBERT 04-007 9340 SOLSA AVE 04-007 9340 BOL AVE 04-007 1 771 DIANE LN WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 WESTMIN ER, CAL 92683 UNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 146-233-75 NERIO, ART M I46-241-24 N IO. MASAO 146-251— 6 AYERS, CRAI6 W 04-007 9340 BOLSA AVE 04-007 40 BOLSA AVE 04-00 16781 OIANE LN WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 ESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 146-233-76 LE DESMAP RAYMOND C 146-24 —25 NERIO, MASAO 146 ES1-07 PETERSEN, GLEN 04-007 5221 STALLION CIR 04— 7 9340 BOLSA AVE —007 16801 DIANE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 r I �t ' r ' lr l }i , ` dt� ' } ►'y 1, £''+.t l>wS! ( ryy�,}„�} a( i `iN', / ¢i 11 'i ,l A' z f a ; 1 M. trw � ►� y: ,11� 1 N r �f uR,u y y� +{ � ;h � + t r.a �'}• ��} I , - t' 'fl. l '� Mr; Yt i` }1'r: r r.,X ,t,�i, .yr �+ "+ ���fi.,;r� � ' +hG! ,} a i. .,.; sib'' + , : � '. 'I BR,!•S18 � .t, AdlIM11t �!91ll1N+w I,AAt. oaotfL NO/ OWNl11! ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP MBRR COO# TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE M •ISO,"err jrOAyr, IAACf 933-810-16 HUANG, GLORIA W 933-810-23 WARREN, GEORGE L -IIy 4918 P[ARC! AVE 04-007 4440 IRONWOOD AVE 04-007 2604 S BORDER Y u NUNTINOTH BCH, CAL 92649 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 CORONA, CA 92720 9 ' i 933-810-20 PRUDEN, CLARENCE A JR 933-810-17 60EKE, ROBERT FRANCE$ 933-810-24 THURMAN, OEBRA K 034-007 4936 PEARCE ST 04-007 88 SETON RO 04-007 THURMAN, RALPH S HUNTINSTH BCH, CAL 92649 IRVINE, CA 92715 361 CANADA SOMBRE t LA HABRA, CA 90631 - A 0 - - - -'�33 810-11 6ARCIA, EDU RD T 933 810 18 ELLIS. KATHLEEN D 933 810 P5 DALSIMER, CHRISTOPHER T i Di-007 5462 BAHKTOH OR 04-007 P 0 BOX 102 04-007 4992 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SUNSET BEACH, CA 90741 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 t 913-810-12 PLECHHER, CAROL A 933-810-19 PITTI, TOMAS J 933-810-26 CROSTHWAIT, JOHN E 04-007 4942 PEARCE ST 04-007 P 0 BOX 21873 04-007 16591 MELVILLE CIR HUNTINSTN BCH, CAL 92649 LONG BEACH, CA 90801 HTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 � I 9 , #33-810-13 VALOV, KATE H 933-810-20 VISCETT09 EMILIE 933-810-27 DOB AN, JACO 14-007 KALPAKOFF, KAREN E 04-007 BRADLEY* EMILIE S O4-007 4966 MARLIN 4946 PEARCE ST 13316 HE 138TH PL HUNTI 6TON ACH, CA 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 f 933-810-14 SCHUMACHER* LOUIS R 933-810-21 MILLER, HOWARD H 933-820-28 CANNO , LANE K 04-007 18542 PUEBLO CIR 04-007 4978 PEARCE AVE 04-007 4968 ARL N OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUM NGTO BEACH, CA 92649 933-810-15 ASHBY, TOM - 933-810-22 KELLY, MATTHEW JAMES 33-810-29 IVIERA HUNTI 6TON C4r00T 4952 PEARCE ST 04-007 4982 PEARCE AVE 04-007 CONDOMINIUMS I C HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ZARMSTRON69 W 16627 BREAM LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 • ' 1 i1 it t i �Yi. 1 '�'� {`%1 '►�' � 1,� It!�4 ii `�s� �� e "����;� �• ,; •' �f.e�wti-' �r�'�i't,�. t �.�kla �+,�a;k• ��� xk S i,� �j' Ila ,'a pyb •• .,,,,.,. .w. r• •r' ra�0A owwri rAfob ti TiA Mwa1 A� wrlr�rl/• �Ni/ to* NAM wNe •///E/• f / !RA AMO ,A0 0��• `h•„) 4ss-1t3-7jp DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS 933-523-89 PLUNKETT# RONALD R 933-810-OL HERSOLS, ALSERT A TR 1 04-001 STATE OF CAL 04-001 8131 RACEPOINT OR 9103 04-007 16128 TORTOLA CIR 8172 RACEPOINT DR 0 2 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, C 92646 433-323-76 COTTA, ROY B 933-523-83 KRAMER# SUSAN P 933-810-03 NIELSEN• TERRY 04-001 8171 RACEPOINT 0 2203 ; 04-001 8131 RACEPOINT OR 1 4 04-007 4898 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEAC , CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 3b3-5t3-77 COTTA, GILBE T A 933-523-84 DECHIRICO, ANN 933-810-04 LALLY, JEANNE MARIE 04-001 1166 KINGS VE NAY 04-001 8131 RACEPOINT OR #201 04-007 4902 PEARCE ST CINCINNATI, OH 45230 HUNTINGTON BE CH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 i':- 323-78 SPANGRNT AL, PAULA E 933-523-BS MULHEARN, ROBERT P 933-810-OS MANNA, ALLEN N r•#,-001 8171 RA POINT DR 020S O4-001 60 TWIN OOK RD 04-007 4906 PEARCE AVE HUNTIN ON BEACH, CA 92646 SADDLE VE, NJ 07458 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 I 1 323-79 SNYO R, KENNETH MOORE JR 933-523-86 BUTZ KLAUS SIEGFRIED 933-810-06 EPSTEIN, LESTER ALAN ;501 817 RACEPOINT DR a1206 04-001 813 RACEPOINT DR 2203 04-007 4908 PEARCE ST HU INGTON BEAM CA 92646 HU INGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 133•-5?3-80 ANLON, MARY ANN 933-523-87 PEEBLES, DESMOND E 933-810-07 CURLEY, ROBERT F 04--.lnl 8131 RACEPOINT OR #101 04-001 8131 RACEPOINT OR $204 04-007 4912 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 933-!523 81 MYLIE, MEL J 933-610-01 ERICKSON# ROBERT F 933-810-08 FRANTZ, MICHAEL J .04-00 8131 RACEPOINT DR 1102 04-007 4892 PEARCE AVE 04-007 4916 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 HARBOR VILLAS ' PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNERS ADDRESS Lot 1:---16751 Moody Cir. J. Harion y 16751 Moody Cir. aD Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Lot 96---16761 " " T, Hooksohildf � I 4841 Curtis Cir. Huntington Beach, Ca.92649 Lot 3 ---16771 " " Little ! Andersonf 3651 Pirate Cir. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Lot a ---16791 " " D. AndrevO 5901 Warner # 352 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Lot 5i---16801 " " g.: 811khu�' 22882 Vie Genoa South Laguna, Ca. 92677 Lot 6.L-- �� f Mcy- ItA j`1�91 L�s{�,�vsfH.S_Vaaant"�_._, Lot 7P---16802 " " R�` AlliA0 1 LHuntin:gton E. 7th St. Beach, Ca. 90804 Lot HI°---16792 " ° T y,Cir. #A Beach, Ca. 92649 Lot 9 ---16772 Moody Cir. ka'!Tusl 16772 Moody Cir. #D Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Lot'IOV--16762, 2137 S. Anchor St. Anaheim, Ca. 92802 Lot 111--16752 =Vista i REQUEST R CITY COUNCIL A PION Date NnvPmber 170 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator VW� Prepared : James W. Palin, Director, Development Service Pa Y � Subject: INTERIM MORATORIUM (ORDINANCE 2869) ON BUILDI J PERMITS FOR LOT #6 OF TRACT 12206 (MOODY CIRCLE) Consistent with Council Policy? [ l Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On October 6, 1986, the City Council adopted interim Ordinance No. 2869 extending the moratorium on the issuance of building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 (lot at southerly end of Moody Circle) . Discussion of the building moratorium was continued to the F November 17, 1986 City Council meeting in order to allow the property owners and the developer to arrive at a compromise with City staff. At that time, the City Council can decide whether to allow the moratorium to continue or to repeal the ordinance by adopting a new ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council continue the interim moratorium on building permits for Lot #6 of Tract 12206 to allow more time for the property owners and developer to arrive at an agreement . Ordinance 2869 will then remain in effect until August 21 , 1987. ANALYSIS: On November 13, 1986, staff met with the developer , Jack Broberg, and Mr. Moody to discuss optional design layouts. Five possibilities were reviewed and are summarized below: 1 . A change of zone and general plan amendment from R2 (Medium Density Residential ) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential ) on Broberg property which would yield approximately 49 units as opposed to 29 units (currently allowed) . A four to six month period of time will be required to process these entitlements. 2. A 25% density bonus (7 units) for Broberg property resulting in a total of 36 units. 3. Integrate the area of Lot #6 of Moody Tract with Broberg property to achieve an additional 3 units to 36 (with density bonus ) for a total 39 units . P10 4/84 d 4. A 25% density bonus for one additional unit on 3 four-unit complexes within Moody Tract creating 3 five-plexes to compensate for the 3 unit loss on Lot #6. Broberg property would yield 36 units (with density bonus) . 5. No density bonus for Broberg property; Lot #6 used as a connector between Broberg property and Moody Circle; north end of Moody Circle be secured with a landscaped planter and emergency gate. Staff met with Mr . Moody and Mr . Obradovich (adjacent homeowner ) on October 20, 1986, to discuss the aforementioned options. Staff reiterated to Mr . Moody to meet with Mr . Broberg to develop a feasible plan agreeable by the homeowners, Mr. Broberg and himself, as directed by the City Council . Staff maintains the position that Pearce Drive should serve as the main access point from Moody Circle to Bolsa Chica and that establishing multiple intersections along the six-lane major arterial highway has been demonstratively unsuccessful in terms of traffic movement, efficiency, safety and additional citizen displeasure when having to operate their vehicle on the public streets under these conditions. If Moody Circle is rerouted, staff supports alternative No. 3 because three units permitted on Lot #6 would be shifted to the Broberg property and the density bonus request would be similar to other density bonuses granted elsewhere in the City. As of November 12, 1986, Mr. Moody and Mr. Broberg had not reached an agreement. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The extension of the moratorium is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: The City Council may adopt Ordinance No . repealing Ordinance No. 2869; or may repeal the ordinance concurrently with approval of an agreement between the property owners. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Ordinance No. 2. Request for City Council action dated October 6, 1986 JWP:SH:kla RCA - 11/17/86 -2- ( 6634d) CAL N OR W!DDLEC( j -r T- 47T ' 11 � 11 i FEIL03 .._. LMLJ a CF - 'R 15E . � j La11G CJt -W> 50, WI C oo MEADOW CR lj --- cs - . WARNER HAF WOO - r ! CALTENTE Dot ETT ► EIL CA Cit CR - R 7605 A Z75► g a 10" a. / V � ` ME�DOw Cot TTT u ;^i iLAtii 1Jtr� N J � � 11,,,,tt..O.K t ;• � taVTE;CA Y WARNFR � to tir -- - .6 Hed Ave. 1 �1 6 ■ 1.6 � W� ■ a a8 ■ t.4; i ! a ■ � 1 T� CM Z . f k IF RESIDENTIAL lVn � _ .cc r CA J ■ `v I y ; T ♦~� N. l �R .2 � ■ ` s z I ► _ ■ f m y SENIOR ■ I i { WE A00w CR 3,21 ■ ■ i COMMERCIALS ■ 1.4 4.8 Wamer Ave. 6.6 6.4 A —L XX IN THOUSANDS T = TRANSITION AREA — OPEN SPACE/LOW DENSITY MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE RESIDENTIAL ■■2= CONCEPTUAL ROADIE . ' ,CONCEPTUAL' ROADWAYS AND ALIGNMENT RAGE DAILY TRAFFIC PROPOSED PROJECT (XX) .TRIPS GENERATED' - BY USE Ave Lo { ► � ( f =Runsthe E 1 ' Or i I J I � ■ � � • ♦ � 1 5. r ,� i ■ ' I -- — --— --=';c z- TrQrsr'�-r'on Arco- Opcn space ur :l ir•� 8e;ch, CA Low ncrui}� Rcsid�f;a I A rpo <<.4 AuProFo sccl endE6tc � r Tr ,{ic ?� ovlwd Tra �4<< a c-->t.r 11 I a. C�1 j &I Ell / 1 (/ / ((•f.. MOWN � 1I � I � cc rr ia Co Ar �_ C�'ll�.n : .. . .�.Ili'. � •f"�... i I .-� f a[� .� •� _ V! cn 00 � .. '{� .r. Ll __ � .r...._— Q� ,1,r;, ♦.� ►� —f1 Q Page 4 - Council Minutes - 11/19/84 ',here being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PC APPROVAL OF TT 12206 6 CE 84-05. - APPEAL DENIED TT 12206 4 CE 84-05 APPROVED The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for the continuation from November 5, 1984 of a public hearing to consider an appeal filed 5y Elliott and Susann Rumble to the Planning Commission' s approval of Tentative Tract No. 12206 and Conditional Exception No. 84-05, a request for an 11 lot subdivision of 3.0+ acres of property zoned R2 (Two Family Residential) . Conditional Exception 84-05 is to permit two flag lots which do not have a minimum frontage of 45 feet. The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Pearce Street and Bolsa Chica Street. Mayor Kelly stated that Negative Declaration No. 84-31 would also be considered in connection with said appeal. The Development Services Director presented a report and spoke regarding the recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission that Pearce Street be the approved access. He reported that another informal petition had been received uovember 19, 1a84 listing approximately 36 signatures in opposition to 3olsa Chica Street access. He compared the sentiment of the petition as opposed to the petition submitted at the November 5, 1984 meeting. E11.Lott Rumble, appellant, addressed Council and stated that he had not been notified of the November 13th Planning Commission meeting. He distributed a letter written to one of his neighbors written by Kr. Moody, developer. He urged Council to reject the Pearce Street access due to traffic hazards to children, noise and headlight glare. Kelly Dowling addressed Council in favor of the Pearce Street access. Steven Ryerse tenant of Mr. Moody, addressed Council and stated he believed the project would be an asset to the City. Virginia Oviatt addressed Council in favor of the Pearce Street access. Richard Harlow representing Ken Moody and the property owners of the Bolsa Chica Nursery in the area, addressed Council and gave reasons why from a traffic stand point be favored Pearce Street access, and spoke regarding the possibility of the intersection being signalized. David 0. Odor addressed Council regarding the history of the matter and stated that he did not believe there had been due process. He spoke regarding the traffic problem and asked why the apartment complex couldn't share the same cut across Bolsa Chica as would have the commercial development. RECESS - RECONVENE The Mayor called a recess of Council at 8: 58 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 P.M. 0 Page 5 - Council Minutes - 11/19/84 Gene Carrothers addressed Council and stated he was in basic agreement with the rest of the residents on Pearce Street. He stated that none of the residents were invited to attend the November 13th planning Commission meeting. He strongly suggested that access not be on Pearce Street, but on some other such as Bolsa Chica Street. He stated that Pearce Street was not a through street. Margaret Wilson addressed Council and stated that she had circulated the xntormal petition in favor of the Pearce Street entry as she believed it was safe. James McMillen addressed Council and gave reasons why he favored the Bolsa Chic& Street access. Janet Odor addressed Council and stated that she did not believe the last petition submitted had signatures of residents living in any proximity to the area. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Councilman MacAllister requested that Mr. Harlow, the applicant ' s representative, to clarif,r aspects of the background of the application. A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by MacAllister, to approve Negative Declaration No. 84-31; deny the appeal to the Planning Commission' s approval of Tentatative Tract 12206 and Conditional Exception 84-05 and to uphold the Planning Commission and staff recommendations with findings and conditions as follows: Findings - Tentative Tract 12206: 1. The proposed subdivision of this 3.02 gross acre parcel of land zoned R2, Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 14.24 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. Conditions of Approval - Tentative Tract No. 12206 1. The tentative map received and dated August 25, 1984 shall be the approved layout with the following revisions trade to the map and submitted for approval by the Department of Development Services. a. Reciprocal driveway easements as indicated on the tentative site plan received and dated August 30, 1984 shall be added to the tentative map. In addition, a landscape median shall be indicated within each easement along the(�A c n property lines. l Page 6 - Council Minutes - 11/19/84 b. Landscape pocket on the corner of Pearce Street and Balsa Chica Street shall be indicated on the tentative map and designed according to Public Works standards. C. Landscape pockets adjacent to Balsa Chica Street and the location of a 6 foot high concrete block wall. 2. The existing driveways on Balsa Chic& Street and Pearce Street shall be removed and repLaced with curb and gutter. 3. All street furniture on "A" Street ( fire hydrants, street lights , etc. ) shall be located behind the sidewalk. I 4.. All vehicular access rights on Bolsa Chica Street shall be dedicated to the City. 5. Driveway access will not be allowed from Pearce Street. 6. A pavement transition shall be constructed at the easterly tract boundary on Pearce Street. 7. The right-of-way radii shall be revised to comply with City standards. S. A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public R.O.W. on Balsa Chica Street. This wall shall be designed with off sets to include landscape pockets adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street subject to design review and approval by the Departments of Public Works and Development Services. 9. Street lights, signing, and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parking posted on one side of the new street. 10. The lots abutting Bolsa Chica Street shall be subject to approval of a Use Permit by the Board of Zoning Adjustments prior to issuance of building permits. 11. All building setba,-&s shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk. 12. All streets, sidewalk, lighting, walls and landscaping conditiore� with this application shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City Departments. Findings - Conditional Exception No. 84-05 1. The proposed flag lots are necessary to permit the applicant to optimize the use of the parcel. 2. The proposed flag lots will not have an adverse impact on traffic ingress or egress within the project. 3. The proposed flag lots will not have an adverse impact on � ' surrounding properties and land uses. Page 7 - Council Minutes - 11/19/84 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Kelly, Bailey, Mandic NOES: Pattinson, Thomas, Finley ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT 84-6 - MAXWELL S - CONT D TO 12 17 84 The Mayor announced that this vas the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Paul E. Wimmer, President, Maxwells, to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 84-6, a request to permit a twenty-five foot high, one hundred and ten square foot pole sign with electronic message board less than twenty-one feet back from the front property line for Maxwells Restaurant at 317 Pacific Coast Highway. The property is zoned Downtown Specific Plan District 10 - pier related commercial. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met, and that she h&Q received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Mayor declared the hearing open. He announced that a communication had been received from Mr. Paul Wimmer, appellant, requesting a continuance of the hearing to December 17, 1984. A motion was made by Pattinson, seconded by MacAllister, that the public hearing on the appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Special Sign Permit No. 84-6 be continued to December 17, 1984. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Pattinson, MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey, Mandic NOES: None ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARING - CODE AMENDMENT 84-19 - APPROVED - ORDINANCE NO 2741 - INTRODUCTION APPROVED - MOTORIZ-F.D/11ON-MOTORIZED VEHICLE PARKING The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider Code Amendment No. 84-19, a request to prohibit the parking or storage of motorized or non-motorized vehicles within the landscaped portion of any lot fronting a public street within the R-1, single family residential district. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met, and that she had received _ no communications or written protests to the matter. The Director of Development Services reported on the proposed Code Amendment and answered questions from Councilman Pattinson regarding provisions for ° boats. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Diana Palmer addressed Council and recommended that there be a time limit allowed to enable boat owners to clean their boats. 11 �� hunt fttoin beach development services department srAFf REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 5, 1986 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44/TENTATIVE TRACT #12756 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 15 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANT/ Jack Broberg DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 16771 Moody Circle June 16, 1986 Huntington Beach , CA MANDATORY PROCF_SSING DATE: j REQUEST: To permit a reduction August 51 1986 in lot width for two lots within a proposed eight- EXISTING ZONING: (Q)R2 lot subdivision I LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa GENERAL PLAN: Medium Chica Density Residential ACREAGE: 2 gross acres EXISTING USE: Contractor 's yard and single family The Planning Commission on July 15, 1986, reviewed seven alternative street layouts with the proposed tentative tract. With a straw vote, Alternative #2 (applicant 's revised request ) , Alternative #3 (Connection to Moody Circle with landscaping barricade at Pearce ) , and Alternative #6 (same as Alternative #3 but includes extension to the east for future access ) were retained. The Planning Commission directed staff to further analyze these three alternatives in terms of current and future traffic circulation (based on proposed land uses at Meadowlark Airport) . A meeting was held on July 22, 1986, with staff, City Engineer, two I Commissioners ( Erskine and Livengood) , Jack Broberg, Robert Skinner, Ken Moody and the Fire Department to discuss the feasibility of the three concepts . Concerns regarding the design of the proposed structures on the new tract were discussed. Mr . Broberg indicated an award winning architect has been contacted to prepare a conceptual layout which will be presented at the Planning Commission ` I meeting . The buildings will not be related to those on Moody Circle and will be designed with sensitivity towards the single family I homes to the east and commercial development to the south. i CA - • �A-iM-29A .;k 9 The City Engineer discussed possible circulation systems for I*adowlark airport and whether access to Bolsa Chica was necessary. indicated that whichever circulation system is proposed, secondary access from Meadowlark to Bolsa Chica would be necessary. Primary choice for the accessway is Pearce Street. Pearce Street is the midway point along Bolsa Chica between Warner and was intended as a collector street. In addition, this intersection is the most logical location for a signalized intersection. This would improve the traffic situation at Pearce and Bolsa Chica and help to regulate L traffic. I Re-routing Moody Circle and/or providing access to Bolsa Chica from Meadowlark via "A" Street (Alternative #3 and #6 ) would increase the level of traffic at "A" Street and Bolsa Chica which is highly undesirable. The effect of the "T" intersection on Bolsa Chica with additional traffic creates high potential for driver error due to several traffic conditions to consider when making movements along Bolsa Chica through the two intersections ( "A" Street and Pearce Street ) . Limiting "A" Street to a short cul-de-sac street with eight lots minimizes the load of traffic onto Bolsa Chica at that intersection . Regarding Alternatives #3 and #6 , the applicant stated that the project would not be feasible if he had to acquire lot #6 of Tract #12206; and the owner of lot #6 indicated he is unwilling to sell lot #6 for street purposes . Thus, if the City required the re-routing of Moody Circle as a condition of approval and the pplicant is unsuccessful in acquiring the lot, the City must then e prepared to initiate condemnation proceedings to obtain lot #6 at fair market value and to make street improvements . I A conceptual land use plan for Meadowlark Airport was submitted by a traffic consultant representing the airport property owner indicating possible internal circulation and the traffic impacts upon neighboring streets . Access would be provided to Warner Avenue and Heil as well as a connection to Pearce Street. Secondary access to Bolsa Chica from any development on Meadowlark would be necessary and should be at Pearce Street. In order to monitor future development of the lots within the proposed subdivision, a conditional use permit is recommended. The applicant can submit one conditional use permit for developing the Lots collectively, or if the lots are sold individually, one conditional use permit per lot must be submitted . This would enable the Commission to review the overall building design, floor layout, landscaping, buffering techniques, perimeter walls, and such details as the number of mailboxes and electric meters per building. The following is a recap of the three alternatives: Alternative #2 (applicant ' s revised request ) : Tnis layout shows eight lots off a short cul-de-sac. The lots are rectangular in shape which eliminates the need for a variance for Staff Report - 8/5/86 -2- (5802d ) reduced lot width and frontage . Access to Bolsa Chica would be limited to right turns into and out of 'A' Street . Moody Circle would remain unchanged. Alternative #3: This concept entails a connection between the proposed 'A' Street cul-de-sac and existing Moody Circle to the north. A connection could be made by acquiring lot #6 of Tract 12206 and extending Moody Circle southerly to an L-shaped 'A' Street within the proposed subdivision . The new subdivision would have eight lots and 28 apartment units , a reduction of two units. Lot #6 is currently vacant and conversion to a street would result in a loss of one lot and three units from the northerly tract . At the north end of Moody Circle, an emergency gate and landscaping could be provided. The driveways on the two northerly developments could serve as turnaround areas . Additional on-street parking would be created between lots #5 and #6 of Tract 12206. Alternative #6 : This alternative combines access from Bolsa Chica to Moody Circle and from Bolsa Chica to parcels east of the subject property and future Meadowlark Airport development. Acquisition of lot #6 of Tract 12206 for the Moody Circle extension and an easterly extension of 'A' Street to the easterly property line would be necessary. Staff Recommendation: Based on the Traffic Division 's comments and analysis , and the fact that the adjacent property owner is resistant to release Lot #6 for a street, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and approve Tentative Tract 12756 with the revised layout as shown on Alternative #2 based on the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44: 1 . Because of the size, c:;nfiguration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The parcel can be divided into parcels that conform to minimum lot width. 2 . Since the subject property can be divided into regular established standards such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3 . Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. (�A:�� Staff Report - 8/5/86 -3- (5802d) TIDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756: 1 . The proposed subdivision of this two-gross acre parcel of land zoned (Q)R2, Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 15 .0 units per gross acre. 2 . The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. 4. The proposed 'A' Street with eight lots will geneate a minimal amount of traffic onto Bolsa Chica and poses no significant safety impact on traffic at Pearce. Any additional lots off .the cul-de-sac and/or an extension of 'A' Street easterly towards Meadowlark Airport increases the traffic load on 'A' Street creating a negative traffic impact on Bolsa Zhica . SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . Tentative Tract 12756 dated May 20, 1986, shall be revised to conform with Alternative 02' . 2 . An 8' water main on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street shall be constructed to connect to the existing system. 3. Sewer , water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works standards . The sewer main shall be an 8' diameter pipe . 4. A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the tentative map indicating the required dedication and improvements . 5 . The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to Public Works standards . 6 . Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at 'A' Street, shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 7 . Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from the project site are prohibited. 8 . Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited. 9 . Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach are required at the corners of 'A' Street and Bolsa Chica Street and along Bolsa Chica. The irrigation/power lines shall be dedicated to the City from Tract No. 12206 and the proposed tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain the landscape pockets and irrigation/power system. Staff Report - 8/5/86 -4- ( 5802d ) J i0 . A fire hydrant shall be provided in the cul-de-sac and another hydrant on Bolsa Chica spaced approximately 300 feet from the existing hydrant per Fire Department standards. 11 . Fire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet and located within 150 feet from all portions of the building perimeter. 12. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 38500 gallons per minute . 13 . A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public- right-of-way on Bolsa Chica Street and designed to match the existing northerly wall along Bolsa Chica . 14. Street lights , signing, and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parking posted on one side of the new street . 15 . All building setbacks shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk . 16 . All streets, sidewalk , lighting, walls and landscaping conditioned with this applicaton shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City departments . 17 . All required parking spaces shall be provided on each parcel . 18 . Common driveway easements shall be required when the parcels are developed to reduce the number of curb cuts on the new street . 19 . Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a conditional use permit shall be required for a master plan of development showing all site plans, floor plans, parking and elevations in compliance with the zoning code and the conditions .stated herein . 111 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may also deny Tentative Tract based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756: 1 . Approval of the subdivision would preclude access from Bolsa Chica to adjoining easterly underdeveloped parcels necessitating future development to obtain access from Roosevelt Lane. 2. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development on 8 individual lots. A2`f Staff Report - 8/5 6 -5- ( 5802d) ATTACHMENTS: 0: Alternatives 2, 3 and 6 Conceptual Land Use Plan for Meadowlark Airport 3. Staff Report darted July 15, 1986 JWP:SH:pb . A Staff Report - 8/5/86 -6- ( 5802d) !7©-26 (7L u BOL SA CIHC,4 STREETql:D �� h� Cial _ if �• %' r 0 O�i t� OL . w t I , � - r % • 40 lik FA/ • /�1 i �/ ./� •�� -•wa �ftNtl CHIC!!/ It (ilt 4i k r .r...� ® Y ( is 10 D cl all (p�� Q • �Ootlrl�I SAW l �• _ ,, .� 1, ��•' t' '• © - a (� � ® � � goo P ® U r $ v •© �' mom L � 17 8-2 1 178 r�.. ? y� W• • ^ i ~ 0 eta M ~ . SPY CA Yy, ♦�i f. ' r, ^1 . H' 1 _ yl . ...r.' w U1 .i. .L l7 O f :1 �2 �.•• .�Y ter,,.l�I.��,,,.. L' _ L •� i) •(IN � 'r �� •"r 1' cp ` �. �' • N tC.. r era• � _ •� L CA� lU►� i�: .� .j �1\ � - (�• Q • � ,saour«r 1 tMit t . , w f 1� ;,„•. tra- �'� 17f c BOL SA CHICA I• S7fi�EET Al 61 ♦ / ��� .•f 'a.+' ,; I• to � ,`• J`,u, . � © � , fjy l�J � 1 •. TI .. • M Z � ~� � .ice ;•.. 1. =y� _ yl � �7 ,� I �' � tso. s� � ••• ti ,� :1 c/I � � © e Mgr --* "'��' �'' r—��� � �l `1�' 1� i i • I N C. a .. s (m) ►� q) W--Ipp-4 I. . � tArr! ww •ti U V ' '� U ID r 01 w �o• y U (U 40 -� C A .• r h • ' .rI ♦ i �•� A co�. - .6 He7 Ave. � ■� 6 Isv1 s All 4 ■ . 1 ■ ■ I �n a 648 t.4; ■ ro w c t RESIDENTIAL � - L cm. ■ — 1.2 ►. T 101 its .2 W 1 Z ■ G T C7 SENIOR CFTIZEN ■ y�` ■ r wEA00w Ca 3.2� ( ■ — ------T COMMERCIAL IN t 1 �s� 4 4.8 Warner Ave. 6.6 6.4 XX IN THOUSANDS T = TRANSITION AREA — OPEN SPACE/LOW DENSITY DOWLARK AIRPORT SITE RESIDENTIAL ■■2= CONCEPTUAL ROAD1 Y CONCEPTUAL ROADWAYS AND ALIGNMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR PROPOSED PROJECT (XX) .TRIPS GENERATED 4J BY US A j 45 huntington beach develo tent services department STA F f P oR 7• TO- Planning Commission FROM : Development Services DATE: July 15, 1986 5:'3JECT: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44/TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 (CONTINUED FROM JULY 1 , 1986) APPLICANT/ Jack -Broberg DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 16771 Moody Circle June 23, 1986 Huntington Beach, CA MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: } REQUEST: To permit a reduction August 22, 198E in lot width for two lots within a proposed eight- EXISTING ZONING: (Q) R2 ' ivt subdivision i LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa GENERAL PLAN: Medium Chica Density Residential ACREAGE : 2 gross acres EXISTING USE: Contractor ' s yard and single family i On July 1 , 1986, the Planning Commission continued Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and Tentative Tract 12756 and directed staff to explore alternative street layouts connecting the proposed j cu -de-sac street with Moody Circle to the north and/or extending ithe cul-de-sac street easterly for access to future development on jad;acent easterly parcels . During staff ' s analysis, several layouts jwere submitted by the applicant, the Traffic Division, Planning Commissioners, and the neighborhood group. Each one has its merits land some were only slight modifications to others. Categorization ( of these alternatives into three basic concepts are presented below i with a discussion following each. i jApplicant ' s Request ( Exhibits '1' and '2' ) : • ! :his configuration is still requested by the applicant (see attached jietrer ) and is most desirable by the Traffic Division (see attached) . An alternative to this layout is shown as Exhibit '2' which shows eight lots yielding 28 apartment units instead of 30. Basically it is the same configuration. as Exhibit ' 1' but includes a longer cul-de--sac. The lots are rectangular in shape which eliminates the need for a variance for reduced lot width and - A rontag e. Access to the adjacent easterly lots would be from oosevelt Street, either to the north at Pearce or the south at warner, when developed. However, modification to the cul-de-sac bulb could be made for future easterly access to Roosevelt Street. Alternative 'A' (Exhibits '3" and 640 ) : These two concepts entail a connection between the proposed 'A' Street cul-de-sac and existing Moody Circle to the north. As shown on Exhibit '3"1 a connection could be made by acquiring lot #6 of Tract 12206 and extending Moody Circle southerly to an L-shaped 'A' Street within the proposed subdivision. The new subdivision would have eight lots and 28 apartment units, a reduction of two units. Lot #6 is currently vacant and conversion to a street would result in a loss of one lot and three units from the northerly tract. At the north end of Moody Circle, an emergency gate and landscaping could be provided (Exhibit '30 ) . The driveways on the two northerly developments could serve as turnaround areas. Additional on-street parking would be created between Lots 5 and 6 of Tract 12206. One suggestion received for compensation for the lot loss in Tract 12206 would be to create another lot at the north end for units ( Exhibit "4' ) . However,- due to the width of Pearce Street and the driveway locations serving the two northerly apartments, the size of the lot would be limited to approximately 3,000 square feet (only 1 nit could be built ) . Alternative "B" (Exhibits "5"1 06", and 170 ) : This alternative combines access from Bolsa Chica to Moody Circle and from Bolsa Chica to parcels east of the subject property. There are several ways to achieve this, each based on different east-west "A" Street alignments. Acquisition of Lot #6 of Tract 12206 for the Moody Circle extension and an easterly extension of "A' 'Street to the easterly property line would be necessary. Each exhibit varies with number of lots and -overall unit count . Exhibit "5" , which was submitted by the homeowners on Pearce Drive, contains 7 lots for 24 units with a four-way intersection. One of the lots would be used as open space anal/or guest parking . Also recommended is modification to the traffic island on Bolsa Chica to allow left turns onto and out of 'A' Street. Exhibit 060 shows 6 lots for 25 apartment units. Exhibit "7" has 6 large lots with 24 apartment units which would create additional open space area for landscaping . However, it would require revising the parking layout of the adjoining southerly commercial development and would eliminate parking spaces. Traffic Analysis : . e Traffic Division has been informed of the alternatives. Their mments are attached. 1 �1 )Ilstaff Reports - 7/15/86 -2- (3628d ) Staff Recommendation: Based on the Traffic Division's comments and analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and approve Tentative Tract 12756 with the revised layout as shown on Exhibit 02' based on the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44: 1 . Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not . apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The parcel can be divided into parcels that conform to minimum lot width. 2. Since the subject property can be divided into regular established standards such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property riqhts. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 : 1 . The proposed subdivision of this two-gross acre parcel of .land zoned (Q)R21 Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 15.0 units per gross acre. 2. The General Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing . The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General Plan. 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . Tentative Tract 12756 dated May 20, 1986, shall be revised . to conform with Exhibit '2' . 2. An 8' water main on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street shall be constructed to connect to the existing system. 3. Sewer, water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works standards . The sewer main shall be an 8' diameter pipe. !�3 2 Staff Report, - 7/1.5/86 -3- (5628d ) 4. A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the 0 tentative map indicating the required dedicbtion and improvements. 5. The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to public Works standards. 5 6. Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at 'A' Street, shall be dedicated to the City of . Hunting ton Beach. 7. Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from tfe project site are prohibited. 8. Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited: 9. Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of Huntin4 ton Seach are required at the corners of 'A' Street and golsa Chica Street. The irrigation/power lines shall be dedicated .to the City from Tract No. 12206 and the proposed tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain the landscape pocke,.s and irrigation/power system. 10. A fire hydrant shall be provided in the cul-de-sac and another hydrant on Bolsa Chica spaced approximatOIY �00 feet from the existing hydrant per Fire Department standar s. 1 . Dire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet and located within 150 feet from all portions of the building perimeter: 12. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 3,500 gallons per minute. 13. A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public right-of-way on golsA Chica Street and designed to match the existing northerly wall along . Bolsa Chica. 14. Street lights , signing , and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parking posted on one side of the new street. 15. All building setbacks shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk. 16. All streets, sidewalk , lighting , walls and landscaping conditioned with this applicator shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City departments. 17. All required parking spaces shall be provided on each parcel. 18. Common driveway easements shall be required when the parcels are developed to reduce the number of curb cuts on the new street. Staff Report . - 7/15/86 -4- �2,>? (5628d) 19. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a conditional use permit shall be required for a master plan of development showing all site plans, floor plans, parking and elevations in compliance with the zoning code and the conditions stated herein. ' 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may also deny Tentative Tract based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756: 1 . The proposed map is not consistent with the zoning code because two lots are less than the minimum lot width required for R2 developments. 2. Approval of the subdivision would preclude access from Bolsa Chica to adjoining easterly underdeveloped parcels necessitating future development to obtain access fram Roosevelt Lane. 3. The site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development on 8 individual lots. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Exhibits "1" through 070 2. Traffic Division Comments 3. Letter from Robert Skinner dated July 10, 1986 4. Letter from Pearce Street homeowner' s group dated July 11, 1986 5. Staff Report dated July 1 , 1986 hl JWP:SH:kla Staff Report - 7/15/86 -5- ( 5628d ) K: 2 / r �.. lab 81 233 ® _ � . r' AAA _9Z?$ _.r�Q•�C� IZ?�o .,zelsty e:?S[rt�.* :.Irf � I (44 4Acr �7 IlI + t6 of y y ,0 1 �. l � V 3 ! AG. 3C. :'5 AC. 1 3 4 N y 1 2 - ;3 PAR t�ir�loprneHt � 1 r !f r•7 i of v *0 C47 •� vl ( P.M. 13-3/ It WA�v s ^ RNER �s AVENU �nr7kgm%m AW.; �,� 178-26 17b o. BOL SA CH/CA STREET - 4 /tv• M M W �i Oi `4 S S © •At&Ar tMa[4 its, 1�C_ NiOC�17�{ GIZ. © ' 0 Q _ t 1 t y 0.f�) e .• I o ! W L 1.4 .' /cal 1- W l)♦ © N •© `�� •i p �„` N t ! Ji� .i� '�� _ ,� v -•wt• a FN/t CMiC![1 ., ^t IN ' /� eta '• too L ! CIA n�-Olt ad FND ROOSEVELT S/ :. r.� ,r.r' i• ' waos[rr�r I t.ur[ R Qom! 484 '- �:. 1 '• O may ® • y i ' • v a .. 46 Y @ -MD /C 'R N • Z , © n • aOD w lot, •y E o- BOL SA Ct//CA .STfTEET y ro u ' . M W 1 �., �' _ lu i ice•. !)I i •� /�l 1 Ji,. .it C-j v ass Ai+Mt pA1Ctl1 at do k!J/ n � ryu � ay• '4 N' 13 P.AOOSEVEI T S :. i-� ,, zIt\ t Mrt I n n r., 7 w +o' y t © v v .So V 1 j7e-26 4 B4L SA CN/CA s TREE T . h M L 1 L • .C. 0 O fZ Q Y . •�' si.. .•e • �.� -ten S M41 DM I Cg%) 0. Iri RODSEVELT S/ i-.+ ,� r• • �• / wanssMtcr Rent Ct) '® O a Gomm to _ •, � ® G) n \tv`) // j,�;,i i 1-1 hkt A:�ltw NL /\ U - - - _ f 0 Wr t�____. _.__. _._._.�_____ _ __-_ Wiz.7 5-6 --FKAFFIC FLOW � Nu ►)T/Nc,� 6u/3EAch 6L c A t' F1� r. l) ��7 L i- M L 01- 1l C,Uf'' p � NoODV CIRfI.E 1� MOODY CIPC-LE 4 A D:rAc-4�N T- L R_L ININTIMTON KACH /IYEL�MQIT SERVICES � r �✓ _ JUL WO O IIWf 1 11 , cR 04 SU -8 M c- mu IU C- /, s- Mono 4 c 1 l� c ( t 26 178- vti o_ BOL SA CH/CA u s THEE T M h k � • L L 0 /tw . AMAr fe MOOPY 1 _ Z ' tw �._...t ro.�eT ••• u_ L ,� .I �i.�i�l � w• .I ` yM'1•- --r �y'• ��4. 1•. I• IL t OD Cj) It ' „�'� Iy�' 1. r 11 . ►`' (/�� �U- , y / W. O 0 to moostvar sr ae +o• y �' © U � C7 U � aIA. " Cb '© . IA hhh I :.:. .rs _ cts A - ' • ` 1 178-26 17 6, o BOL SA CHICA STfrEET 4 as t• . . Y ' Z, M � • t _ Qbb 0 0 WIN : - X n tip a m. u .i• :r.s 1 ;1• � i +1 r-- u��` 1� {h ,b I"~ /I I• I fr.r. iI•' . ® W 0 O p, U ar ` aq CAW #oosEvELr sr. ifatoo ,,.,• j ( �. {��. a.wr @--� 1 , ;0% lop �� .� TO: Les Evans FROM: Bruce Gilmer City Engineer Traffic Engineer yUBJEM Proposed Street DATES July le, 1'46 Bolsa Chica , S/o Pierce St. On Wednesday, June 99 I attended a meetinq in the Planning Dept . with memb:�?rs of the planning sta*f and the proponents o4 the proposed developement on the oast side of Bolsa Chic& ju-s: south a+ the recently completed project by Ken Moody iwho was one of those present at the meetiog) . The matter under discussion was the direction of the Planning Commission to the developer and staff to explore alternatives to the cul-dd-sac design that was presented as the staff prefarence. This was done following substantial objection by the Pierce Street residents. They objected that the street as designed subjec:ed them to unnecessary traffic imoacts wren the airport property was develooea. Pierce Street would then be the only way out to Bolsa Chica from the airport prop®rty. We reviewed several alternative plans and e;•Gl,fired the pros and cons of each. Throughout the discussion I maintained a single position regarding additional access points onto Balsa Chica: small cul-de-sacs such as the one proposed were acceptable as low traffic generators, and would rvot seriously interfer with the operation of the arterial higmway, but any suggestion to establish a second :major arterial intersection near Pierce Street was operationally unacceptable and potentially unsafe. I was gt •wen tnree (3) plans to consider and co-meat upon regarding their positive and negative aspects a traffic zoint of view. Copies are attached , marked Alt 1 tnru Z. My comments area as foi 1 ows: Alt 1 Original pr�ggsal_ This plan allows access by right turns intc and oi.At of the site under consideration. The amount or genwrated traffic onto bolsa Chica at this point is small , and poses no siyni +icant safety imoazt on traffic at Pierce. The resi d-ynt s of +_h. s new tract wool d CE.. :-CrgUi• ed to in,Ake ths-mir- turning novement to go soLLt:l +; t+olsa Chica at thca Pier-ce intFrsactior• is U-tern; . '-ow' v.er , the small number o-; gene►ated trips from the would not signi +icantly impact that intersect3,an. This plan also fulfills the Planninq Commissions promise to the Pierce Street residents at the end of the existing cul -de-sac that the property south of that new cul-de-sac would not be allowed to generate traffic onto Pierce Street. r 4W A 1� � �wl19�'Mgr� RlfiiSitl3�= The "difitotton show% fihere closes the Moodv Circle int-arsection si_t,•h Pierce Street, mo redirects all traffic direc'tiy onto Volta Chic&. A total of 19 lots that haavo 4 U01-tS each could be ex0eCted to goner&t• 6" plus trips dall.v, or 60 in this peak hour . That level .04 demard it mcovratt. We could anticipate C9mand to permit left turns into and out of the new opening on Bals-a Chi.•x which is not desireable. Ir. addition , _he ' Fierce Street closure ,would oo more properly cono with a cul-de-•aa.: tape end traatmente Alt 3 = _'F.lture Arg,esl_ This plan is identical to Alt 2 with the addition of a "stub" to the east boundary of the nee+ tract to crovido for a futL;re connection to the property to the east. The proposal w'ZL:Ia "square off the and of the street in anticipatior: of the new connection. T'+e same co-mr-3r is as for Alt Z apply wit?, this addition: the "2cen door " notion to :Hake a major co--inection t•.3 Balsa Chica at a Point other that at Pie-- _e Streg is total ! urdesi't:.b:e and unacceptable in terms o trat*fl :_ ape -•aticn . The '3=fact cf SL!Ch i =-7r.ne_tiCr% would be to create a new "T" :ntersecticn with major traffic loading :.inl y a short distance SOUth of the Pierces intersection with similsr tra*fic leading. That pra:simi y o- Nigh ease irtersecticns on Ma.;or arterial h i ghways 1 e.ad'3 to hi qh pctenti al for driver error due to having several traffic conditions to -on3ider when making movements into and out of the two intersections. I strongly rwcoir•maand the continued position that the usa o= F i erce Street as the designated collector road into the area east of Balsa Chica is appropriate and serves Vie ne oCs of the community at largo. The existing homes to the rorth of ;�,i erce have en j%:,%led its use since it was constructea, and the, Use by others as the area expands is -no difierent than the "X Pier i ence a- u trier d4vel op omen is a'i they wo-arte cor- struc ted in our community. Furthermore, any future consideration for traitic controls on Balsa Chica would be made at the Pierce ntersection sin._s it serves both sides of the Boisa Chica a*-teari•al . Final : v . tc astaolish multi•.31a ir•!_�er*ection3 al -ing a si -i ane ma j it hi ghwa; has beer •1t:-•-tonstrabl y L1.6-ISUC &!S3y U1 i-i tz?rr'_ =f tra4 lc moveme^t , e-�ii�ienc'1. safety, and citizen displeasure when having :c oparat:3 their veh i z l e s on the public --cad: unot�-r these e conditions. '60 Ix . at;li 9P.W Illso �1 Amos -qp I RfA "'E = • ' �CCtt�tst t�of � t' i Mvt tit/ AGT I y ; � 17 - � � 16 •,� l .0 ALT a Vt. AG.' 30.15 AG14 ± . j r ,K �.► ,� y r' pie PW PAP I tD 503 :., •1 N } �; se•• t y CD + ! TO i .16 ) 1= 1 k @ (34 - mvm V. ;-J/ W l.Is AG ZVI ;-- WARNER AVENUEIWAWY x '. _ 163- t ►F -,. ell 2 -"NSi9ttnc9 Btuwitsth The mod14ication shcvM here doses the Moody Circle intersection with Piercf Street , and redirects all traffic directly onto 0olsa Chic*. A total of is lots that ha* 4 uol rs a*,,h could be * tO*ct*d t-3 generate 600 Plus trips d:ai l,v, or 60 in the peak hour. That level of demand it mope-•ato. We could anticipate Coomand to permit loft turns into and out o4 the new openinq on Sols•3 Chi;_,a which is not desiroitblte. In addition . :he Tierce Street closure would be more properly con* with a cul-da-sa•_ tape and traativent. _'Feature Arces!*" This plan is identical to Alt 2 with the addition of a "stub" to the east boundary of the new tract to crovido for a future connection to the property to the east. The propossl w-0,Le10 "square off" the enj of the street in an,ticipatior: of the ,new connection. The same eomaterts as for Alt = apply wire this addition: the ":peen door" action to rake a major ce•,nection to Balsa Chi_•a at a oaint other that at Pis-- _e Stree"; is total i and un-acceptable ir- terms o-4 tra4fi _ open at ice:+; . The -3-=fect cf SL!Ch 3 =--3r.ne•_ticr- would be to create a new "T" :ntersecticn with major traffic load.ny :?niy a short distance south of the Pierce intersection with similar tra=*ic leading. That proximo Q :11gh uses intersections on `ta_or arterial highways le-ad-3 to high pctentia: for driver error due to having sever-.41 traffic conditions to -onsiear when making moveme►rts into and out of the two in ersections. I strongly recommend the continued pusi tiCK) th_At tne' use of Fierce Street as trA designated collector road into the area cast of Balsa Ch i r_a is appropriate and serves the nieeecs of the community at large. The existing homes to the north of Pierce have en%:yed its use since it was constructed, and the use by others as the area expands is -no different than the e ),Psriencle a- d;evelop-eme=enr5 a"3 they wer►a ccrtstrucfed in our community. Furthermore, any future consideration for tr`a*fie controls on Balsa Chi ca would be maadv at the Pierce ntersecti on sin.:e it serves both sides of the Balsa Chi ca —tert•al . rtnaL .L . tc es_aOtish multi-.31a ir,!_'arsections, al -3r+g ->t si -i ane ma J �jr highwa . ha% deer. •Je,:ronstrably- UWIS+_IC''43ShU. i i tar ! '_ =f tr a4--: tc mover,-A.-Ht . e'ril:tt�rlC'/. safety, and addtct_ra: citicen c]ispleasure when hi4ving :c -ipvratzi their veh i I as on the Public •-cad i uno r these conditions.. N b • /� t tow • • �«s�w :avert � 0 eae ® fie0 . o ' e0o0 I l Alpmemo . PEA RC C ALT ' , �COtlrtaf t/K � `cts O . / AG. to a AC. � i .• •! y xx ! r y t PAIR ? i; is , SS • !• • PAP d �S P.� ! •. s3 .��c :� �•., • sue-r 44 C41 P.At p 39• . k44 143 . -P �1 Jw • � ram' WdRN£R t= .OVFNL fir► ••• 163• LE�tIE LAME •-•. a W% at L s/ a •� ice► j. : . �f AV Lip I e- P�ARCE ! s. ;� '�;i L• �. 1 ACT ! / y E ALT / AC.04Al is AC. i0. i? _'• 1 1 V 'Y -A- .:j..'�: Z ra! f V • O �3jet ...ti • t G4 loe ua• • ~� ,� • ( tr. �•3/ W J �p ABC - jag WARNER s AYEMUE ... _..� .fit► _ �3- - �� . to awt, _. •i �� ,r g wow odho ., � i • i ! . ® ® •. # .ter , & r � • a iii / • ® •*ae�.. lrer PSARCE i r• •,a 1 pwr Sri 1 ACT f .. ALT ..._tom 1 i • Jd. •eas r IWO PAR It ell 3 ar i� rii-tit itoo 1 �• 1 D3 N f •1 - . m rev Its, % SAW. �•�/ W t�s Ic "`• ,► �� (4# l i RAWER `fro j AYEAI ter it �rr+� AW 1 Tvr Mr. James Paylin Director of Development Services City of Huntington Beach KW p a July 19" JU00 • . t.0. � �426i8 Mr. Paylih: In response to the Planning Commission's request to analyze altern- itive configurations for Tract 12756 I have examined five concepts and will comment on each, individually. Furthermore, I would also like to mention that I have met with members From the planning staff, engineering and public works as well as, Mr. Dick Nerio. Our original configuration, which was supported by the planning staff, still remains the most desirable for several rea• ons. Primarily, this configuration (see config. A) allows the optimiza- tion of land use within the allocated density for the parcel. In addition , its layout reduces off-site costs and therefore, equates total land cost with construction costs, producing a potentially profitable development. Configuration A also has the approval of Bruce Gilmer, head of traffic , as it does not adversely impact the traffic situation on Bolsa Chica. This configuration seats with the approval of staff, engineering, public works and all aspects of the Tentitive Tract Map Act. The only deviation from City code rests in the need for a reduction in minimum lot width, which has no effect on the other lots within the tract or any surrounding properties . In conclusion, the Master Plan depicts R-2 throughout this entire area and will therefore sustain a density of (15) fif- teen units per acre. Thus, the property is zoned to a density of (30) thirty units (15/ac. 0 2ac. gross) . However, in' order to ap- pease the concerns of the Planning Commission we are willing to offer configuration B as an acceptable alternitive. This configuration extends the cul-de-sac further to the east, elim- inatiftg the two end lots. Although this alternitive reduces the total unit count by two units (30 to 28) it still permits (8) eight lots which also offset the original land cost enough to create a potentially profitable development. In addition, this alternitive eliminates the need for a conditional exception. Due to design similarites , configuration B does not adversely impact traffic on Bolsa Chica and would receive suppaort from staff. One final con- sideration concerning this alternitive lies in the ability to con- tinue the street from the end of the cul-de-sac at some future time in order to access future development to the east. The third alternitive (config. C) involves running the street directly through the property in order to grant access to future developments. This alternitive also reduces the unit- count by two units and allows for eight lots. However, several technical problems exist within the layout. Based on the meeting I at d with the 2 planning staff, enggineering and traffic, this alternitive creates 3 traffic problem if it were connected with Roosevelt St. Bruce Gilmer feels that the traffic problem created by this alternitive would aggravate the situation requiring residents to make U-turns down stream in -order to double back and gain access, due to the limited access off of and onto Bolsa Chica (right turns- only). This problem would be further compounded by the amount of traffic generated by the full extent of this configuration. He also feels residents would illegally attempt left-hand turns off of and onto Bolsa Chica because of the increased volume, thus requiring that the city seal off the traffic cut in Bolsa Chica. Another consid- eration rests in the fact that this alternitive requires the consent of two other property owners and relys on the assumption that these properties would be developed in a manner that necessitates such an access point. The traffic department would considerinn elongated cu-de-sac, but this predetermines the exact layout of any future development to the east and could possibly pose similar traffic problems. I might suggest that it is not the responsibility of the Planning Commission to layout developments but, rather to determine there benefit to the community. I have discussed this alternitive with Mr. Nerio, concerning his future intentions. Unfortunately, I have not received any concrete response. Furthermore, it would seem more logical to create a mirror image to the east, taking access from Roosevelt. The final two alternitives (config. D & E) were purposed by the citizens and the Planning Commission respectively. Due to there similarities in design I will respond to both at the same time. After careful analysis, I feel that neither has much merit. First, it is important to note that configuration D will not allow the (8) eight lotspurposed and, if in fact it would, two of the lots would require a conditional exception. As for lot layout, this alterni- tive would only allow (6) six lots, possibly (?) seven with a CE for minimum lot size . In general, the lot layout would be similiar to configuration E. From an economical stand point, this alterni- tive reduces profit potential by two full lots and drastically in- creases the land cost beyond equitable relys. By reducing the tract by two lots , the land cost increases by over 54,000 dollars per lot for the remaining six lots. In addition, the economics of squiring the property required to pu..ch through fzlom tract 12206 are prohib- itive . In order to purchase the property, if in fact it were avail- able , the sale price would have to reflect the value of the land plus the profit lost due to the elimination of a building. further- more , these alternitives would require a fundamental reshaping of the existing development to the north. The re-routing of traffic off tract 12206 would only create the same traffic problems previous- ly disc»ssed . Not to mention, the added hardship to tract 12206 residents who would now be forced to make U-turns in order to access their homes when Lraveling south on Bolsa Chica, considering they currently have direct access. In conclusion, neither option has approval from Public Works/ Traffic and configuration E would even further compound the traffic problem bringing all of the considera- tions from configuration C as well. 3b Thank you very such for your cooperation. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me a (714) 840 •. 2922. Sincerely Robert L. Skinner Project Manager / Authorized Agent Jack M. Broberg Developer 1 3� ' assact� oilLOOS Ac. ;f r � fee © ® ® ® �. ® M so AM / or PEARCE ' a �� •COttrEa* &Avg* al" fir' •o& ��.7 j /Ivr 50) r Y �-- — Acr M i7 t6 Vt. i AG. 30. 15 AC I i ? Of ,le 4' 2' •'3 j• Jar.", d r y t . (30 Z P4A I ,1 Pit 9 . a' CD V 33 _ 5, N ./ co ( r 04) 'D6 1 (34 - Fjo "4'1 ,g 5 4 J�- f—- :�. -; � `' � , ,�►. �,-ai � ' + ale ?.Is Ac ?� ^° WARNER s s � = AVENUE (WWWS M AVE 16 3. OCL M ME L ANE A&n oc um 10- g � e � �► aa JWWJfW Aft c P.QRCE ; •oosrrnr e•.r I �• —'-��. a000,fh►s silt kl. W R11 -- _ y �' J f F-" -- ;a c r " IT 16 � JJ.15 AC i PAST. Qoff tD 503 ."�� S �•1 ' CVwoo r r m Q -�sri. T— 0 ! « •�� - moo,--r-- ass• � ~� � � j t w t.is AC WARNER-�-� AVENUE .�► '„ 143- c try TR AV. 05 At Al. 10 - Mf • ® t.is as Af C ~ tons" !G :l Y rD 8 0 e 8 L! ® ® ® 1 O f® \J V ,7Ar vt � 1JP�,L/ 1 9oott.tsr &Art `• i :1' sf• sa:s,ftar , livr jr)zoo ; Acr ti • . /jo N ' mV I loc. G) j f y ss�so• t Pa•? / . A2 � 1 PA A a N . � m Q is, T` 1 O P.,K 137--1? cn ••�t — o,f !� aT ;•.�o J uo' WARNER s = AVENU AR • w I� LME LINE ,v o o � o o •• - y irectAM •,�, � ® © ® � � t is •c. , CD Au PM r"'� r •r •„r � rr • z � �` � tfurw�r �fM�il a• ® e e � e • Pc ARr 306 Roll AGT , 1 � AC. -10. 15 AG l � ' ? I �I • ' ' �..rs 7t sar• f .y, y, t , AL 51 406 1407 � e Pd4 / j�s P4� 1 -�i .• � � Q .,:• x _*ram• T._ f J� 1 .it • •,� '3 ' i 3 38 �, � Rev. 3-!� � '� t.ys •� 1 I t0►l/ � Z saw se WARNER .� �--�� AVENUE t wMr� ;OW-) `r " off um CA got SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44 TEIiTEMENT TRt 560— OWNER: Jack Broburg, Moody APPLICANT: Jack 8roburg, Moody GENERAL PLAN: Medium density residential R-2 REQUEST: To permit reduction of lot width to allow more "Yellow Elephants." LOCATION: 16852 Bolsa Chic& Road REASONS FOR DENIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential North of Subject Property: R-2 used as Motel Zone "Yellow Elephants" East of Subject Property: R-2, vacant, "Land Locked" South of Subject Property: 2-story, C-2, nice commercial 025" feet height West of Subject Property: Medium density R-3 condos--2-story with large greenbelts Item 8 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE mentioned that parking is main issue, on-site parking only. ecre Ag�re��eme��nts__" between Moody and various recorded owners show willingness of bootleg extra bedrooms. Present use of this type of substandard lot is to park in street. On-site parking is not practical because of building size ( it ss*usssive) and design. We request staff rfcommendation on June 9, 1986, to be followed to have recorded agreement on each parcel stipulating: ( 1) Building height of 25 feet or less (2) Maximum bedrooms and units (3) Be approved by the Planning Commission. 1 ( 1) . We feel property should be developed as largo projects with appropriate, greenbelts. Mt'lihrays, and adequate parking for residents and posts. OR (2) Connect street to Doody Circle and place fire to (closed) at Noo ody Circle and Pierce and connect Road "A" from eo�a Chica to Roosevelt Street; thus, forming a "T" shaped street to an east west and north- south configuration. (3) Since shape of lot is standard rectangle, no flag-shaped lots are permitted and no exceptions to zoning are needed. Common driveway only discourage residents from using provided parking and encourage on-street (crowded) parking. We concur with staff in requiring a conditional use permit to restrict number of bedrooms and parking spaces on-site prior to the issuance of building permits and limiting building height to 25 feet or less. Approval of this subdivision would "landlock" R-2 property on . 30sevelt . Street. In addition, parking and traffic on Pearce Street would aggravate residents further as well as depreciate homes and land values on Pearce and Roosevelt Streets. Moody should not be allowed to develop lots further because: 1. Proposed flag lots over-develop parcels and permit 4-story boot- logged apartments with inconvenient parking so residents park on the street. 2. Since proposed flag lots limit traffic ingress and egress from property because of difficulty and inconvenience to new residents all parking will be on Moody Circle and Pearce Street. - 3. Proposed flag lots will adversely affect all residents including adjoint R-1 and C-2 zones, new residents will not have onough on- site parking accessible ae-cess. Building'height limits of 25 feet or less would preclude any bootlegging of bedrooms and units. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR REVISED PLAN In addition to staff rscommendations to have property meet existing laws and ordinances dated July 1, 1986: 1. Building height limit of 25 feet or less would stop "bootlegging." 2. Fire access gate to be installed at Moody Circle and Pearce Street closed all other times. 3. Connection of Moody Circle and new Street "A" via new Street access. 4. New Street "A" to connect to Bolsa Chica Road and Roosevelt Street as alternate resident fire lane for R-1 develop'mnt adjacent to North of property. 5. All backyards set back to conform to existing R-2 and 2-3 to west of proposed property and be no less than 20 feet from merest R-1 lots. 6. All required parking spaces shall provide easy access for ingress and ogress. 7. Conditional use permits required for all building permits shows compliance with; laws and no Bootlegging. (Controlled by building height limits) COMDITIQk4 FOR DENIAL 1 . Because of size, shape,. configuration of Tot, flat, rectangular land abutting Bolsa Chica Road there are no exceptional circumetances` end property conforms to adjacent lot widths. 2. Since property can be developed as regular lots to established standards a conditional exception is not required in order for enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply to deprive the sub ect property of privileges enjoyed by others and applicant shows a willingness to exchange deeds with Moody and others in order to disguise real intent of eventual usage of land. They plan on changing after approvals are granted. 4. Building height limits would prevent over-development of property and conform to existing R-2 usage. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL 1 . Previous owner Ken Moody and Janet Moody continue to show interest in property and are persisting in getting approvals for saw type of buildings as the 4-story "Yellow Elephants" on Moody Circle. 2. Approval of subdivision would "Landlock" R-2 lots on Roosevelt and preclude alternate access to Bolsa Chica Road. Existing R-1 lots require fire access and emergency access from airport area. All R-1 lots using access to Pearce Street need emergency and fire alternate access routes to Bolsa Chica Road. �.r J `57 v• •_O rOWNTS ON JUKE 99 1996 MEETING J. T. Moody Company is still in control of project and conditional us* permits are the only way to control this erratic builder who feels he's above the law and can fool the city easily. The residents are not fooled by his Hotel District of 4-story "Yellow Elephants." k Commercial marketing of Moody Circle shows commercial usage. Signs are used in a commercial manner and project should be separate from existing R-1 homes adjacent to subject property. A building height limit of 25 feet would limit Worcgient problem of bootlegged units. r • S� . �d h hileloil bmwh d`vriopiht botoi os srtm*nt SrAf GPOIRIL TO: Planning Commission FROM: DeV*lbpment Services DATE: July 1, 1986 - SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL EXCBPTION NO. 86--44/TMATI*z motet if!56 APPLICANT: Jack Broberg ATE.. . p- 16771 Moody Circle June zji IYND Huntington Beach, CA � OWNER: Robert Curtis $ 1935 �-.a��f�i[�_.DATE 4952 Warner Ave. , Ste ._300 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 EXSaT.iki6.. _ZftiKL: (Q)R2 R_E_QUEST: To permit a reduction in ezzmw-guw: #Aidm lot width for taro lots enemy ROsi+8entiai within a proposed eight- lot subdivision. ..USE: contractor's Yard And a ngI ii tAki i Y LOCH: 16052 and 16852 bolea r*JAALkncie CA i ca ACREAGE: 2 gross acres 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and Tentative Tract 127SG biased on the findings and conditions of approval outlined in this report. i 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Tentative Tract 12756 is a request to subdivide a two gross acre site into eight lots with access from A proposed short ebi=aa=sac street from the east side of Solo& Chica Street. Conditional Exception No. 86-44 is to permit a reduction in lot width fzom- 45 feet to 28 feet for two flag-shaped lots. If the subdivisioh is approved the applicant proposes to request appropriate. entitleaent for six four-plexes and two tri-plexes for a total of 30 apertaent units. ISPI .As9dW 3. 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, .ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: i abject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: (Q)R2 LAND USE: Contractor's yard and single family residence North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 LAND USE: Apartments East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 LAND USE: Residential South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION. General Commercial ZONE: C2 LAND USE: Office West of Sub ect Property: 4kNE9AL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R3 LAND USE: Residential . 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered under previously approved Negative Declaration No. 86-10. 5. 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6. 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7. 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. Staff Report ,- 7/1/86 -Z- (5481d) 1. 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: ✓Aw.r11 June 9, 19e6, the Subdivision Committee not and discussed the proposed tract swap. aepresentativ" from tb:+* fire Department# Public Works Depactment, Development Services Department and Planning Commission were present. Their main concern was the issue of parking. An indicated by staff• the revised parking ord ikance requires all parking spaces, including spaces fait guests, to be on-site. Another concern was the review process for approving the proposed apertment buildings after the ma is approved. In order to reduce the possibility of conversion to illegal units, staff suggested that either a letter of agreement be recorded on each parcel stipulating maximum number or units or require all future developments be approved by the Planning Commission. 9. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Last month, the City Council Approved a zone change for the subject property from (Q)C4 to (Q)R2. The conditions of the •Q` were as follows: 1 . The two subject properties shall be developed as an integrated development, either in the form of a largo project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac street. The provision for the •Q' have been reflected on the proposed tentative tract map. "-%. [he applicant is proposing an eight-unit subdivision for purposes of -' constructing 30 apartment units in the form of six four-plexes and two tri-plexes on a two gross acre site. The lots range in size from 6,300 square feet to 8,500 square feet. Access to the 'lot's will be via a 256 foot long cul-de-sac public street adjoining the east side of eolsa Chica Street . Bach two lots will be served by a common .driveway. Two of the lots are flag-shaped with less than the minimum 45 feet lot width which necessitated the conditional exception. Maximizing the use of the land occurs due to the shape of the lots. r- Building permits for development on lots 2 through 7 may be issued following approval of the tract map without further review. Approval of a use .permit by the Board of Zoning Adjustments will be required for lots 1 and 8 because they abut an arterial highway. Because of the nature of the project, its proximity to an arterial highway and adjacent commercial development, staff has included -a condition that a conditional use permit be filed with a mast*t development plan indicating floor plans, parking, elevations, and detailed site plans which would be reviewed and acted on by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of building permits. Approval of this subdivision would preclude access from an identical size piece of land to the east, also zoned A2, to Bola& Chica. ,)wever, development on that parcel could take access off of '%�oosevelt Lane. 001 .1 0 Staff Report 7/1/86 -3 ` t548id) 10. 0 RECOMMENDATION: 4xaff recommend$ approval of Tentative Tract 12756 and .Conditf.onal ception No. 46-44 b&"d on iM following f"iid"iAgs and, c+Jttone of approval: FINDINGS FOIE FAOV L .- CO`NVI?LQ EXCEPTION N0. . 86-44: 1 . The proposed flag lots are necessary to permit the applicant to optimize bhe use of the parcel. 2. The proposed flag lots will not have an adverse impact on traffic ingress or egress within the project. 3. The proposed flag lots will not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties and land uses. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TJtACT 12756: 1 . The proposed subdivision of this two-gross acre parce _ of land zoned (Q)R21 Medium Density Residential, is proposed to be constructed having 15.0 units per gross acre. 2. The Genera: Plan has set forth provisions for this type of land use as well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of housing. The proposed project complies with the Land Use Element and all other elements of the General plan. iThe property was previously studied for this intensity of land �- use at the time the land use designation for Medium Density Residential was placed on the property. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . Tentative Tract 12756 dated May 20, 1986, shall be 'the approved layout. 2. An 8' water main on the Past side of Bolsa Chica Street shall be constructed to connect to. the existing system. 3. Sewer, water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works standards . The sewer main shall be an 8' diameter pipe. 4 . A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the tentative map indicating the required dedication and improvements. 5. The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to Public Works standards. 6. Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at •A' Street, shall be AmAicated to the City of Huntington Beach. Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from the Ir, project site -are prohibited. aff Report 7/1/86 (5481d) 8. Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited. 9. Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of Buntington Beach are required at the corners of *A' Street and Sol" Chica Street. The irrigation/power lines shah be dedicated to the City from Tract No . 12206 and the proposed tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain the 'landsdape pockets- and irrigation/power system. 10. A fire hydrant shall be 'provided in the cul-de-sac and another hydrant on Bolsa Chica spaced approximately 300 feet from the existing hydrant per Fire Department standards. 11 . Fire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet and located within 150 feet from all portions of the building perimeter. 12. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 3,500 gallons per minute. 13. A 6 foot high block wall shall be located on private property adjacent to the public right-of-way on Bolsa Chic& Street and designed to match the existing northerly wall along Bolsia Chica. 14. Street lights , signing, and striping shall be installed per City Standards with no parking posted on one side of the new street. 1'% . 15. kll building setbacks shall be measured from the back of the sidewalk. 16. All streets, sidewalk , lighting, walls and landscaping conditioned with this applicaton shall be in place prior to the issuance of the first building permits on the individual lots subject to approval of all City departments . 17. All required parking spaces shall be provided on each parcel. 18. Common driveway easements shall be required when the parcels are developed to reduce the number of curb cuts on the new street. 19. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a' conditional use permit shall be required for a master plan of development showing all site plans, floor plans, parking and elevations in compliance with the zoning code and the conditions stated herein. 11 .0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Exception No. 86-44 and Tentative Tract 12756 based on the following findings: Staff Report - 7/1/86 -5- 03 (5481d) FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-44: 1 . Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique �. • topographic features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings or premises involved that does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the same district. The parcel can. be divided into parcels that conform to minimum lot width. 2.. . Since the subject property can be divided into regular established standards such a conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 3. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classifications. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 12756 : 1 . The proposed map is not consistent with the zoning code because two lots are less than the minimum lot width required for R2 developments. 2 . Approval of the subdivision would preclude access from Bolsa Chica to adjoining easterly underdeveloped parcels necessitating future development to obtain access from Roosevelt Lane. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map 2. Proposed tract map 3. Subdivision Committee minutes dated June 9, 1986 JWP:SH:kla Df Staff Report - ,- 7/l/86 -6- � (5481d) a R2 as *�► '. R2 C4 2 .R2 R2 MN RI RI R3 wl RI /+ ROS CF- R R2 R2 ]R2R2 :CF- " R '" ~ �J •w R : Rt tq RI • , a OW ' RaR-01 R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R3 R2 RI — . ( � � R3 R3 R3 R3 . ----�' . R3 R3 R3 C ! t R2 R R2 R3.19 R2 . RI RI fit RI RI RI RI RI RI oil -CZ CZ R1 RI R3 � RI • R3-23 RI-CZ R3 RI « ' • n tl-CZ RI-CZ RI ... RI ... « C9 c G'� moo• y� � �.�� HUNTWoTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION J -RAC-10^. NO. 12756 . tl�i•'Mt1 •7bw�• �rs:.� ��� .:Ow • .1 7 7i! f*gwIto-K7i I � i ' 1 trr.►T/IAflI/r • y :7 I j susdr��L �_ • 1 f I#9kwr Cp Aa0'M*Ail � ? 1es iba. •C,�+.evej. H I 1 � ,LZ� AL + j ; 0 -nao ♦t� �w.4s itD S 4�,V,.N 4 t3 I-r% 17 42 �! .1ST _.ram- N SCALS:i 14a M •I' Y•�I it�ir•i- Ih � is IL v + i f e ♦Vvr� e200� Z: v.1 d300� r a K•' 4rJ..r�i . 1 ' IA HUNtIN6TON BEAC-R • cv s... t��t/�C T SENC OG�GLYI'111LN1 JLR•�`iES iM5 M�►� 4 • . r I "' �`�`' i , 1- MAY 2 0 ?9r P.O. Boot 190 _C..+..;..... _. - Hmngft Bach. CA 9 SUBDIVISION MINUTES JUNE 98 1986 4:00 P.M. Commissioners Present : Jean Schumacher, Frank Mirjahangir staff Present: Bruce Crosby,, Scott Hess, Tom Poe, Daryl Smith, Howard Zelefsky TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12756 ppliant: J. T. Moody Robert Skinner of J. T. Moody stated that the request is for an 8 lot subdivision on a + 1 .8 acre parcel for development in the future. Six of. the lots are ' 8,000 square feet or more and two lots are 6,300 square feet . The proposed access is from Bolsa Chica through a cul-de-sac with a 42 foot street and 80 foot turn- ng radius at the end to provide access of fire equipment. Be said they would provide all off site sewer, water and stubbing each lot with cable, water and telephone service. Public Works Requirments and Comments: Left-turns onto or off of Bolsa Chica Street to and from the project site are prohibited. 2. Parking on Bolsa Chica Street will be prohibited. 3 . Because of limited parking on the proposed cul-de-sac (multiple driveways) and the number of dwelling units to be built, on-site parking is very critical. Developer shall provide enough on-site parking to accommodate residents and anticipated guests. 4 . An 8" water main on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street shall be constructed to connect to the existing s}stem. 5 . :ewer, water and drainage systems shall be designed per Public Works Standards. The sewer main shall be an 8" diameter pipe. 6 . A cross-section of Bolsa Chica Street shall be shown on the tentative map indicating the required dedication and improvements. 7 . The curb and right-of-way radii shall be revised to Public Works standards. 8. Access rights to Bolsa Chica, except at "A" Street, shall be P dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. .� Uw 5 9 . Landscape cut-outs dedicated to the City of ifuntington Beach are required at the corners of *A* Street and Balsa Chica Street. The irrigation/power lines shall be tied into the system from c Tract No. 12206. Easements for the irrigation/power lines shall *be dedicated to the City from Tract No. 12206 and the proposed �• tract as necessary for the City to properly maintain -the landscape pockets and irrigation/power system. Tom Poe reported that the Fire Department would require an additional fire hydrant in the cul-de-sac and another hydrant on Balsa Chica spaced approximatelli 300 feet from the existing hydrant . Fire access lanes must be a minimum of 24 feet. The water main must supply a minimum fire flow of 3500 gallons per minute. Howard Zelefsky reported that Development Services was concerned with the lot widths of lots 3 through 6 . Minimum lot width for cul-de-sac lots is 45 feet which is measured 20 feet back from the property line. Staff suggested the applicant reduce the number of lots to seven to meet lot width requirements. If note the applicant would be required to file a conditional exception to the Planning Commission. Robert Skinner, representing the applicant, indicated that there probably would be a reciprocal driveway between these lots. Mr . Zelefsky advised the applicant that it would be helpful to the Planning Commission to supply layout, building footprint and conceptual plans for the Commission' s review. Oesponse to Commissioner Schumacher, Howard Zelefsky reported that the Commission would not see the floor plans for each lot if the applicant applied for a conditional exception. commissioner Schumacher was concerned due to the problem of bootleg units in the City. A previous entitlement to Mr. Moody for a four unit project is now five units. The units are designed in such a way that once they are sold they can easily be converted to additional units. Daryl Smith suggested that the applicant be conditioned to submit a letter stating the buildings will only be for four units. Scott Hess said that was possible but created an enforcement problem. Tom Poe stated that the driveways will be red curbed and posted as fire lanes. He went on to say that if the Council approved the Fire Department Sprinkler Ordinance, the applicant would be required to provide an automatic springler system in any buildings over 5#000 square feet. (A: 6 t5374d X?(, Subdivision Minutes - June 9, 1986 tt j 6 . ppp f 1 April 24, 1987 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main St. P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 i Subject: Tract#12206 Lot 6 To Whom It May Concern: The owner of the above referenced property, Janet T. Moody, will not and is not going to sell this property. ncerely, ane T. Moody � l DATE: August 1, 1986 TO: The Huntington Beach Planning Commission The Huntington Beach City Council RE: Development at Bolsa Chica, Pearce and Moody Circle We, the undersigned residents of the neighborhood, being adversely affected by the Moody/Broberg developments,. are presenting to you our proposal to rectify the unacceptable conditions these developments create. WE PPOPOSE: 1) A firegate closing off Moody Circle at Pearce. 2) Approval of the development of the Moody/Broberg parcel ONLY with the street configuration as shown in figure B. 3) A limit on building height of all units constructed on this parcel not to exceed two (2) stories or the height of the office building to the immediate south--whichever is less. 4) A strict conditional use permit on all building plans that require review of units so as to prevent extra mailboxes, utility meters, bath- rooms and kitchenettes, etc. , which could facilitate bootleg units 4n the future. We supply the following supporting evidence for each numbered proposal : 1) A firegate closing off Moody Circle at Pearce is necessary for several reasons: a) The configuration of Moody Circle only 100 feet away from the Bolsa Chica and Pearce intersection does not allow enough footage for clear egress and engress. b). A blind corner. at the S.E. corner of Bolsa Chica and Pearce, created by the 4-story Moody building, further complicates the safety Issue. c) Similar firegates at Santa Barbara and Saybrook, and at Edinger and Santa Barbara 'WITHOUT landscaping or cul-de-sac designs show that this proposal is not unique. d) The Traffic Department is ignoring many facts; the unique configuration and proximity to a major highway and the inter- section of Moody Circle; the lack of cn-site parking requirements at the Moody development guarantees parking problems on Pearce for all existing, as well as, future residents; the additional traffic from 10-12 units on an undeveloped R-2 property immediately east of Moody Circle has never been taken into account; the future traffic from development of Meadowlark Airport is repeatedly I • August 1, 1986 Page Two downplayed; meter readings have been taken on days and at times that misrepresent the reality of the traffic flow. (July 3rd, the day before a three day holiday weekend, from 6:15 to 4:00, on one side of the street not traveled by residents leaving for vacation! ) FIGURE A �O A-1 Homes 2 stork , VAV j Drive ayjjLriv 'Ndxt . . Driv- .;a, L ynl\CL, Masi, ,�_...V. - RBARCr, east O sa R-3 N . c#i R-2 story t :C ► M W Condos U u .` 2 story a U .O a Q OW • 2) The neighborhood IS NOT fooled by all of the name changes on the parcel in question, and the Planning Commission and City Council should not be either. The bottom line is that potential insensitive developers from outside our city are going to develop this parcel . The close relationship of Mr. Broberg and Mr. Moody should certainly insure a smooth tie-in of both properties! Indeed, it should be noted -that the sewer on Moody Circle extends south THROUGH the vacant lot #6 and is overwhelming evidence that Mr. Moody had every intention of developing this second parcel from the beginning. Our proposal is not substantially different from Mr. Moody's! It merely exits Moody Circle onto Bolsa Chica instead of Pearce. It also serves the long time residents by insuring traffic and pedestrian safety, and by August 19 1986 Page Three keeping the "mini-hotels" a community unto itself---which it certainly is by its very design and non-conformity with R-1. R-2, and R-3 property on all four sides. The street configuration proposed by the neighborhood actuafTy makes for a VERY controlled traffic situation. See figure B. This brings to light another item the Traffic Department seems to have missed. There is a break in the traffic island on Bolsa Chica at Shark Lane. This break is almost due west of the middle of The Moody/Broberg parcel . By putting the outlet south at the end of the property, all traffic is excellently controlled by the double north and south turnouts, removing the -necessity for U-turns at either Pearce or Warner AND eliminating the possibility of left turns onto Bolsa Chica southward. 3Y This item has been proposed specifically ,because the new parcel is _approximately 500 feet from the Meadowlark Airport runway. The city does not need to endanger any more citizens by approving 4 story buildings next to a flight path that is frequently deviated from.. When the first tract of homes to the north was built, several pads already oured were re- .Aected for buildings by -the county supervisors. We invite the Commission and the Council to use the same common sense, and to use it before the developer proposes any building plans. Mr. Moody has several 2-story four plex designs, as he has exemplified on Green, Sims, Hoskins, etc. bias proven there is no need to go higher. 4) Mr. Moody has made this fourth proposal a must. His 4-plexes are specifically designed to become 5-plexes as soon as the inspectors leave. At 5021 and 5072 Dunbar, Mr. Moody's units have windows and curtains in garage doors. His new units -at Moody Cirtle have extra rooms called everything except bedrooms to avoid the parking and code regulations. The sales personnel there have mentioned the roommate and "renting out" possibilities of some sections of the units not. approved for such* purposes. This proposal also protects future buyers from being con- vinced they will have more income from illegal units. IN SUMMARY: The Planning Commission and City Council approved the beginning of this project last year. Since your approval of the project the developers have taken advan- tage of you. Numerous changes have taken place since your approval and yet the developer has not requested your further approval . The developer seems to find every loophole in your building and zoning codes. The developer used your approvals against everyone's intent and wishes. It is now time to stop the developer from further aggravating and enraging the neighbors by his continued use of loopholes to fool our city government.' August 1, 1986 Page Four In ' } FIGURE B _ - ` Moody #6 _Moody #5 _ 4Isewer-_ _ Moody 47 -- --- -- ----------------- C • u 4 units' ;y b 4 units d o •-+ u P 54 4 units U 4 units Shark Ln. o _ -- - - �4 ,o =: i o * ,� 4 units . -4 _LI1i s ��nazi�+GC-s:;:..�4�,► EO .-, ��- 3 units aov `M Moody Circle--"A" St. 14 0 i ,,,,�z 2 story Commercial low Flo. _• , �. .. Iph NO T_s 1 _X I / 92.RK _ I V�=A iLa _ f August 1, 1986 Page • NAME ADDRESS w". 1 C'A- l1 ram -BUAC.-2 py oc lz 2 , bit#[ . P"r 1 GL./ C t r- f�C� ya G w cl Ali 04 August 1, ; 1986 Page NAME ADDRESS v i 042 ate. / AXE tar � • / �i z2ilftz-19 pt- AP(2e ooue- �46 Va r 1 i vx— .5 i c t Wt SZ r 1 1 ' I 1 • I � ,c� ,for Q • J • - �L � P 'O!(A fop owl "�� 16 seal I$- �1 P'jAt, ,. qj fT too lei D SQr� 'r3.7o' 1�4••�'� It .....«.. I 4 U IT IL _ mil__ {-_. _._ .-•"f_-�� � .1 � ' � ``':Y �, I - � . —4 kL EN r, 4 2_ ii/■/• I •iiiii/iiiiiiiiiii uu/u/a/u/ou' F \ J f r � r y i f' t d�' , a 2�c*t,-,y,�<,t1 <Xy '.t;..�;r•.� Y r�„ �: ��� < l f� } _ r v o •