HomeMy WebLinkAboutOpen Space Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 - Negative De • ' �SNlL
OPEN SPACE /CONSERVATION
ELEMENT A/14END/VENT 81 -1
huntington beach department of
development services
io/et
i
RESOLUTION NO. 5054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING OPEN SPACE AND CON-
SERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 TO CITY 'S
GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with
changing community needs and objectives; and
A public hearing on adoption of Open Space and Conservation
Element Amendment No. 81-1 to the General Plan was held by the
Planning Commission on December 1 , 1981, and approval for rec-
ommendation to the City Council; and
Thereafter, the City Council , after giving notice as pre-
scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least one public
hearing to consider said Open Space and Conservation Element
Amendment No. 81-1; and
At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring
to be heard on said amendment were heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7 ,
Chapter 3 , Article 6 of the California Government Code, commencing
with section 65350 , that Open Space and Conservation Element
Amendment No. 81-1 to the General Plan, consisting of the follow- �
ing changes is hereby adopted : i
1 . The thirty ( 30 ) gross acre area located north of Ellis i
Avenue , east of Edwards Street, and 630 feet west of Goldenwest
Street is hereby changed from� Planned Open Space Development
to Recreation.
2 . The Wieder neighborhood park site is hereby deleted from
the Open Space and Conservation Plan, shown as Figure 2-8 in Open
Space and Conservation Element Amendment No. 81-1.
ahb
12/7/81
( A) 1.
F
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st
day of December 1981 .
xce
Mayor
.ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED : i
i
City Administra r irector of Development
Services I
I
l
I
i
I
I
4
1
I
1
2.
i•
Res. No. 5054
aft STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day
of December , 1981 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
MacAllister, Thomas , Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT
AMENDMENT 81-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Environmental Status 3
2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 5
2.1 Central Park Expansion 6
2.1.1 Background 6
2.1.2 Huntington Central Park Planning History 8
2.1.3 Existing Site Conditions 13
2.1.4 Open Space/Conservation Policies 13
2.1.5 Bolsa Chica Regional Linear Park 16
2.1.6 Ellis Avenue Realignment 16
2.1.7 Economic Considerations 19
2.1.8 Staff Recommendation 20
2.1.9 Planning Commission Recommendation 21
2.2 Miscellaneous Changes 21
2.2.1 Wieder Park Site 21
2.2.2 Staff Recommendation 21
2.2.3 Planning Commission Recommendation 21
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 23
3.1 Physical Features 23
3.1.1 Topography/Soils 23
3.1.2 Geology/Seismicity 23
3.1.3 Hydrology/Drainage 24
3.1.4 Vegetation/Wildlife Habitat 24
3.2 Land Use and Zoning 24
3.3 Traffic and Circulation 24
3.4 Air Quality 24
3.5 Noise 25
3.6 Archaeology 25
3.7 Public Service 25
3.8 Economics 25
3.9 Alternatives 25
3.10 Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's 26
Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of
Long-Term Productivity
3.11 Irreversible or Unavoidable Environmental Changes 26
3.12 Growth Inducing Impacts 26
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report represents Amendment 81-1 to the Open Space/Conservation
Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The Open Space/Conservation
Element was adopted as a mandated element of the General Plan in December,
1973. This is the fourth amendment to the element since its original adoption.
The amendment proposes several changes to the Open Space/Conservation Plan,
which is shown in Figure 1.
The primary area addressed in this amendment is the area south of Huntington
Central Park between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. Within this area, 30
acres are proposed to be redesignated from planned open space development to
recreation, both of which are consistent with the Land Use Element Open Space
designation for the area.
The intent of the Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment is to enable
enlargement of Huntington Central Park from its present 297 acres to total 327
acres. This expansion reflects, in part, the Community Services Department's
schematic master plan for Central Park which assumes an ultimate area of 353
gross acres. The amendment raises a number of planning, environmental, legal
and economic issues which are analyzed in Section 2.1. A miscellaneous change
to the plan is also proposed. This change, which includes the deletion of one
neighborhood park site, is summarized in Section 2.2.
1
tV
•�'• �� •yam � �'�
i
:
• tea.
i = •
_
F
_
#
LEGEND Fig :e 1-1
PUN NG. 86/CH.Oti FORNIA
PtN,PJ1NC> DEPAiiTlblEN � Rraowce Prener.'e � Resource Production OPEN SPACE AND
® Se•rnic GocTidor Open space Development CONSEPVATION PLAN
Rrciration Afra [J3� Open Space Plan Area
s N,i'ltbochood Para, (No.Indicates Primit.0
® 16atrf krra Sphere of Influence
a
1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
The area of concern of Amendment 81-1 was considered in an Environmental
Impact Report as a part of Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment
80-1. Though later tabled by the City Council, Amendment 80-1 proposed a
75-acre General Plan redesignation and was analyzed in approved EIR 80-4.
Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 is proposing a General Plan
redesignation for 31 of the 75 acres originally considered in EIR 80-4.
Amendment 81-1 covers less than half of the area of Amendment 80-1 and
would create an even lesser environmental impact.
The City's Environmental Review Committee has determined proposed Open
Space/Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 to have no significant
environmental impacts, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared and
posted.
3
2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN
Amendment 80-1 to the Open Space/Conservation Element which proposed
expansion of Huntington Central Park by 75 acres was tabled by the City
Council in December, 1980 pending further economic analysis. An economic
feasibility study of proposed uses for Central Park was completed by
Ultrasystems Inc. in May, 1981. The analysis recommended implementation of
a mix of revenue generating uses to offset the development and maintenance
costs an expanded Central Park would impose on the City.
On August 17, 1981, the City Council directed a realignment of Huntington
Central Park boundaries to include, at present, only a portion of the 75 acres
proposed in Amendment 80-1. The area proposed for expansion lies east of
Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue and 630 feet west of Goldenwest Street.
This 30-acre site is the primary area of concern in Amendment 81-1 (Figure
2-1).
Council also voted to place approximately 26 acres of land comprised of the
mushroom farm located at the northwestern corner of Goldenwest Street and
Ellis Avenue in a planning "mode" for a six-month period to further evaluate
potential park expansion and/or alternative uses for these areas.
The following sections analyze the various planning issues surrounding the
proposed 30-acre General Plan redesignation.
5
IIi.�� ��■/i1//a,/Ii////eir �1 11 Neilli///��
��1111 ��■111///111/ /111/1■/IIIIrI �1/1/11
lisp ii IIIII �ii4
•�� � � : 111.E IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
_.11..E IIIIII11ItIIINIII.
_ ■1�1 �-■11r!
Q= i ■riZ11 ; 4 �: �!�ill��
�■ :: 1��/ 1/!N/1l11 II�Iu1u11 � � I11�
�I 1�
����I►�� �h�1 i111/ii��i� _
IIII I IIIII
IIIIII{I lit
Illlllllllll
IIIIIIIIIIII
Attu"��tt
�'llllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIII •IIIIIIIIIIII'Illltlllll: � ,. ..�
,IIIIIIIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIII ,Illiilll�lllllllllll; s
mills AIL
illlllll{IIIII{III{IIIII °III111111111�1111111110,
riitiiiluu,u' ur tlitllit :uulu�l�'"liltiiuuuljc
u 'Illllldl 1.
:IIIIIIIIIIII
!IIIIIIIIIIII
Illillll
•
2.1 Central Park Expansion
2.1.1 Background
The Open Space/Conservation Element contains a statement of the City's goals
and policies concerning the conservation and management of natural resources
and the preservation of open space for recreational and other compatible uses.
These policies are reflected graphically in the Open Space/Conservation Plan
diagram, which designates seven categories of open space and conservation
areas: resource preserves, scenic corridors, recreation areas, neighborhood
parks, water areas, resource production areas, and planned open space
development areas. This amendment request invokes redesignating some 30
acres from a planned open space development area to a recreation area.
The recreation area designation applies to all public and private park and
recreation areas that are community-wide or regional in nature. Neighborhood
parks are not included under this designation, which is intended to reflect large
open areas and active recreation facilities such as the beach, regional and
community parks, recreation centers and golf courses. Huntington Central Park
is depicted on the Open Space/Conservation Plan as a 297.3-acre recreation
area. The City currently owns all property within the existing park boundary
with the exception of a number of encyclopedia lots. Approximately 180 acres
of Huntington Central Park have been developed, leaving 55 acres west of
Goldenwest and 62 acres east of Goldenwest undeveloped. Within the
amendment area of concern, the City currently owns a 5-acre parcel and
approximately 100 scattered encyclopedia lots totaling just over six acres. The
remaining 65 percent of property in the area of concern is privately owned.
The planned open space development designation applies to special resource
areas and permits open space and other kinds of uses, including residential,
which maximize open space benefits by incorporating natural resources into
development plans. The 30 acres being considered for amendment from planned
open space development is predominantly vacant with the exception of several
abandoned buildings and five active oil wells with two tank enclosures.
The proposed amendment raises several important issues concerning present and
future uses and ownership of property within the area of concern. Within the
30-acre site presently designated as open space in the Land Use Element,
redesignation to recreation would prohibit residential or other non-recreational
development, which is currently allowed under the planned open space
development designation subject to existing zoning. In order to ensure
development that is consistent with the General Plan, property within this area
would either be purchased by the City or rezoned for recreational use.
Another issue to be resolved in considering the proposed amendment involves
the importance of Huntington Central Park within the context of the City's
overall open space, parks and recreation plan. The expenditure of park funds to
enlarge Huntington Central Park may affect the acquisition and development of
planned neighborhood parks. Maintenance costs are also a critical concern, and
are discussed further in Section 2.1.7. In order to better understand the nature
and role of Huntington Central Park in the context of the City's open space and
recreation plan, a brief history of park planning efforts follows.
7
2.1.2 Huntington Central Park Planning History
Planning for the acquisition and development of land for a central city park
surrounding Huntington Lake began in the mid-19601s. Over the years, the
ultimate size of the park and the nature of uses and activities within the park
have been the subject of much public interest and debate. The 1966 Parks,
Open Spaces, Schools, and Recreation Element to the Master Plan of Land Use
called for a central city lake and natural area of 65 acres, to include a natural
history museum, a wildlife center and possibly an adjacent public golf course.
This plan further recommended that should the opportunity arise to acquire
property in the area at a reasonable rate, the City should consider additional
acquisition. Active recreational uses were to be located at at least three
community parks and recreation centers, one of which was proposed for the
southeast comer of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street.
In 1969, a special bond election was ;held, in which the voters of Huntington
Beach overwhelmingly approved the use of general obligation bonds to finance
the acquisition and development of the City's park program. The ultimate park
system proposed at that time consisted of 32 neighborhood parks, six larger
community parks, and a central city park covering 147 acres -- a regional
facility to offer multi-use recreational opportunities. The 1969 conceptual plan
for Huntington Central Park is shown in Figure 2-2.
In 1970, the City Council authorized the issuance of $6 million in bonds and
hired the firm of Eckbo, Dean, Austin, and Williams, Landscape Architects, to
design Central Park. The EDAW design plan incorporated both natural and
man-made features to create a diversity of recreational opportunities including
hiking, fishing, camping, canoeing, picnicking, tennis, basketball and golf.
Additionally, a central city library, multi-use recreation building, parking
structure, indoor-outdoor restaurant, tea house and amphitheater were also
proposed in the EDAW plan to integrate cultural opportunities within Central
Park to complement the recreational activities.
In the early 19701s, a city-wide Policy Plan was developed to establish goals and
principles to guide the city's growth and development. This plan called for a
central city park of 200-400 acres that had qualities of a regional park by
nature of its large, open natural areas, trees, and lakes, but also of a
community park to serve the local community's recreational needs. With the
1971 EDAW Design Plan as a guide, a three-phase acquisition program was
proposed, expanding Huntington Central Park to 450 acres at ultimate
development and including areas both south of Ellis Avenue and west of
Edwards Street.
Concerns about the costs of acquiring, developing and maintaining such a large
park area prompted a financial study in 1973 which indicated alternative
configurations of an expanded park, proposed realignments of Talbert and Ellis
Avenues and recommended several strategies for financing acquisitions. While
the majority of the existing park area was designated for passive use, plans for
the area immediately north of Ellis Avenue included an 1B-hole golf course,
equestrian trails and an equestrian center.
8
=y1n1or
>� y� l
1 )
LEGEND
1 MIGRATORY BIRDS 10 PICNIC AREA :1j3 ,���5} K
2 CAMPING 1I FISHING i �i �.jfJ ntoa�� �h=r rI�rj ? %' v
3 COMMUNITY CENTER 12 BOATS
4 RUSTIC VILLAGE 13 RECREATION BUILDING; IO to 1�� `•��' ��
5 LIBRARY 14 NATURE AREA
6 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD 15 ARCHERY RANGE
7 BASKETBALL 16 MARKSMANSHIP RANGE ; I; O 18
8 VOLLEY BALL 17 THEME PLAY AREA
9 TENNIS 18 GARDENS };+`;G �• �j� O ���
L, (A) ----C) <(ll C ' ' C1J V-- .... �_.: U TALBERT
,.,.c4
. .1 J ! I �. `� I
C:
C _I I i 0 0 a C�� / =� I¢
u I.J �I ' O ���� `� O- L. <
U.. `O. I�' ::' ICI-) �.\ IJ ) � ' H 1-
Inc! : ,` � O
10
r
I •{ 14
\ lttto��it�SoY j tl_ t�si
b
Kvk
2
�R `-/;,,`...�4�'•`�;-tr.:' � ' �;�'C.:.t�r .^-.rC.l� i c� ; 10
�s�i..r:,�.aa�:l.�pw.:+��,�+..n,.O J2.�-l.t•-L�t/.li ' �ttnaauro�tt�t>J�n�
Dt:sign concept of the proposed 147-acre Huntington Central Park, to be financed by the bonds described in this
offic;ol statement. The three areas outlined in black are presently owned by the city.
1969 Conceptual Plan
>N
a
ER:.,
1a Figure 2-2
a
9
Park planning efforts were also influenced by the adoption of the Phase I Land
Use Element of the General Plan in December, 1973 and subsequent
amendments. On this plan, the area north of Ellis was shown as the proposed
expansion of Huntington Central Park. The area south of Ellis was designated a
planning reserve, indicating that additional planning was necessary to determine
the most desirable land uses for the area, which had been industrial prior to the
deletion of the proposed Route 1 Freeway.
The entire area south of Huntington Central Park was analyzed in the March,
1975 amendment to the Land Use Element. The recommended land use plan
showed Ellis Avenue realigned 660 feet south of its existing alignment and the
area north of the realigned highway designated for the possible future expansion
of Huntington Central Park or other open space uses to buffer the park from
estate density residential to the south. However, at a study session on
January 20, 1975, the City Council directed that the park boundary be fixed 660
feet north of the existing Ellis Avenue alignment. The area between the park
boundary and Ellis was subsequently designated for open space uses, allowing
public and private agriculture, recreation facilities, parks, single family homes
on 1-acre parcels and resource production. The Open Space/Conservation
Element adopted in December, 1976 reflects the park boundary as established
by the City Council in 1975.
After passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, the City Council directed staff to
pursue alternative funding sources to finance development and maintenance of
City parks. In response, staff proposed that Central Park be divided into
passive, non-revenue-producing active and revenue-producing active sections
(Figure 2-3). The prospect of developing revenue-producing uses within the
park in addition to passive areas made a larger park area more viable, and the
City Council agreed to include an additional 75 acres within the Huntington
Central Park planning area for the purpose of developing a master plan and
studying the feasibility and compatibility of more active recreational uses.
Ultrasystems, Inc. completed an economic feasibility study of
revenue-producing uses in May, 1981. The study explored several land use
alternatives and recommended implementation of a mix of income generating
uses for Central Park including, among others, a hotel and convention facility,
an 18-hole golf course, a recreation vehicle park, a restaurant, snack
concessions, a YMCA facility and an amphitheater.
On August 17, 1981, the City Council rejected consideration of a golf course
and hotel/convention center and instead approved a more passive-oriented
development plan for Central Park. The Council-approved master plan includes
an expanded equestrian center, a sports field complex, a fishing lake,
compatible fast food concessions and a YMCA facility in Central Park (Figure
2-4). The Council voted to expand Central Park by 30 acres to include the area
east of Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue, and 630 feet west of Goldenwest
Street. This 30-acre site is the primary area of concern of Open
Space/Conservation Element Amendment 81-1. The consulting firm of Cardoza
Dilallo Associates, Inc., in cooperation with the Community Services
Department, developed a revised Central Park master plan to reflect the City
Council's direction. The area of concern is conceptually planned for a variety
of equestrian-oriented uses including riding trails, stables and a rodeo arena
with seating facilities.
10
-r--T T77—iT
T
DR c_ CR
kli; � t
g
MORRO My IN �L ER
DR
L
Id-TURT7M TLA I VM A
W',
C F E
E70 VIEW S, V13TA OLL SOL A,
:L
F7 T
1 L
J, �_.Fou
J i
PASSIVE RECREATION
6
7 DLRT
NON-REVENUE-PRODUCI
ACTIVE RECREATION
�g�p-_ �4�. .-{��_• .,_ ,-`,�. ego®aoo®� . .11� I
Ti
45
4D so,
0
REVENUE-PRODUCING'
ACTIVE RECREATION CF-C
................ ...............
........ .......
X= A F=1 2 L m mr, I
I __j
Figure 2-3
.. ,� � �: . 'Lt 'irk��ir.'•:, . J1 � � -
E!�'ll•, a».r*♦ '+��rAy'♦�t� Teti�/ ~` � 1 •
_ hi�J'�i�S�'bOj��- �'" {',i'� r�tY}_� ����v J•��1,+�j�L ��:�•i�, .n�' �� (• "��` � +
ol
• ��..���� •'. d�+��-'S�r--'�. 'Tq1;[\`� p s i� t �. ....7�.'-� �•:'�':T .t .`,-tom, ♦ •��'���
"'� is�'•�i. L19
�:i:y'�+r� .il'{D' �ttl :�-�jl�i.�•'(...�f y� swrr.r•.:.:� .�tY..r.:�.f.u �r1 � d
;Et Sw" �T�4"��+N� 3'- .•t� J`F-R...T t� Z
III rtT`���r�a►�:,. ; ' , { t...�.. ,�:,, t•� - tb ` �
• S�-`'y4J•N Ili R � ' f ..4.." f/ w 1 +
mg!jill
- - -_ �.nir'kiS.�3+S'�1 .ir,�er(�•-ice.+. _ --
ihl
�.a•► •. ... sue•-- - � - _ _
,,,,,,►►��,,,,,,���� .�p �{V- i+�,ib,1t�:.�NKcil��tKM.YRN.+Yf✓Ad .
{ •ter ' �� __� _`�' 4,� dI.�:' ♦ 1�.4'
r� ��Y •�'.�1h 1�-•�'j,rl .t` «:,yV.i I+; T ik
a_.:. R! .f• ���' `/ M_ ��)� ,�' 4 ,�(�t�', ••c�ilrtl���'� iIC�� d� ��. ,�•.� i(•
2.1.3 Existing Site Conditions
Within the area of concern, the 15-acre area located northeast of Ellis Avenue
and Edwards Street is characterized by rolling topography and a natural draw
which runs generally toward Huntington Lake. The 5-acre area adjacent to
Edwards Street is owned by the Huntington Pacific Corporation and has five oil
wells and two tank enclosures on the site. The remaining 10 acres are
comprised of encyclopedia lots, and while there are no active wells in this area,
several old buildings remain on site. On either side of the draw, the land rises
to an elevation of nearly 70 feet above sea level; both of these high points offer
commanding views of Huntington Lake, the Library and Huntington Central
Park, as well as the City and San Gabriel Mountains in the distance.
The City owns the 5-acre parcel immediately east of the encyclopedia lots
mentioned above. This parcel slopes up gently from the north and south to a
summit of 65 feet, and like the previous area, offers scenic views to the north
and east. One active oil well and a tank enclosure are located on this parcel.
Immediately east of the City-owned parcel is another 10-acre area comprised
of encyclopedia lots. Much of this area is a ravine which runs between elevated
areas to the northwest and southeast. Two active oil wells and two tank
enclosures are located in this area. The southeast corner of this area is flat and
elevated, and currently supports part of a stables operation.
2.1.4 Open Space/Conservation Policies
The previous sections have attempted to provide some background concerning
the history of open space planning in the City and a familiarity with the
proposed amendment. This section analyzes the request in relation to the
stated goals, policies and objectives of the City's adopted General Plan.
Briefly stated, approval of the requested amendment to the Open
Space/Conservation Element would enlarge the area of Huntington Central Park
from 297 to 327 gross acres. All of the area in question is currently designated
for planned open space development, which allows private nonrecreational uses,
including residential.
The Open Space/Conservation Element states the following goals and policies
for the City's land resources:
1. preserving and protecting outstanding geographical and topographical
features;
2. encouraging beautification of oil-producing areas and restoration of
nonproductive oil land;
3. maximizing the outdoor and environmental potential of the City by
providing comprehensive, coordinated recreation, parks and open space
programs that fulfill the needs of all segments of the community; and
4. seeking joint participation, in all resource categories, among all levels of
government, private citizens and involved agencies and organizations.
13
Goal: To create a productive harmony between man and his environment
by:
1. preserving and protecting areas of significant historic, scenic and
archaeological value; and
2. developing and maintaining high standards of visual beauty within all
areas of the city.
The area of concern, with its rolling topography, bluffs and scenic vista
potential, is a unique resource in the City and is worthy of preservation. These
aesthetic features also enhance the desirability of the area for residential uses.
As oil uses phase out of this area and other vacant land in the City is developed,
pressures to develop this area will mount. The Open Space/Conservation
Element outlines a program of preservation that relies on a combination of
public ownership and regulation of private development to achieve the above
goals and policies.
The City's primary means of regulating development to preserve open space
resources is through restrictive RA (Residential Agricultural) and LU (Limited
Use) zoning, which covers all of the area of concern (Figure 2-5). The intent of
the RA district is to prohibit land subdivision and/or development until the
property is rezoned to conform with the Land Use Element of the General
Plan. Residential uses on lots less than one acre in size are prohibited unless
the lots abut a dedicated street or vehicular easement. The LU district is more
restrictive, prohibiting any residential use and subdivision and requiring a
10-acre minimum site area. Both the RA and LU zones are further intended to
be temporary or transitional in nature for the purpose of further planning and
for zoning or environmental issues.
While the existing RA and LU zoning districts are compatible with the planned
open space development designation in the Open Space/Conservation Element,
amendment of the area to recreation would necessitate rezoning for
recreational purposes to prohibit residential or other non-recreational
development prior to City acquisition. The City's zoning ordinance contains a
limited number of recreational zones that could be applied within the area of
concern. The Recreational Open Space (ROS) district is intended to encourage
privately or publicly owned and operated recreational facilities which consist
predominantly of open landscaped space with incidental structures. Permitted
uses include athletic fields, boating, fishing, golf courses, picnic grounds,
racquet and tennis facilities, recreation centers and swimming pools. The ROS
district is not intended for restaurants, shops or other commercial uses.
In order to implement zoning to reflect the schematic master plan, a number of
alternative approaches are available. The City may apply the Recreational
Community Facilities (CF-R) district to those parcels already in public
ownership, as has been done with the remaining Central Park area. The CF-R
district allows an unlimited range of recreational uses but can only be applied
to public property. A second alternative would be to develop a new zoning
district to allow commercial recreational uses in specified areas of Central
Park, which would allow either public or private ownership and operation of
such facilities. A third alternative would be to develop a specific plan for the
entire park area, indicating a range of permitted uses for different areas of
Central Park. The adopted specific plan would take the place of zoning
districts in regulating uses in the park.
14
I _ RI ) RI _J5[ RI 1
RI RI RI I
y f
C T& M D.. Ca_co.' M I-C D
RI RI
RI --,J
J s
CP. YY AND[�iNA � DP.
R' CF-E R - RA �� $
d INES VI£w SC NOC:.1 r . -CD' O O
I RI RI RI RI
U NA CAPON. DP
Qil �
a RI 3
� P RI P CF-R
c. [
RI
RI RI RI RI
C F-1\ I -
7i RI pp E� �I MI-CD
RI Y RI .Ni1b7'C6 ".Nl'+11.i:flh.) i }tiAs• `i
d' i rMl -CD `
RI R11
RI RI �44
to
RI ~ —�mIM—I-cr
5
RI RI
s P � _
RI� R11
g I - w
J' - 0
C F R
t MI-CD
a - PSC MI-CD
�----
,.. RA-0-CD
M I
RA-0-CD !�
RA-0-CD CF-C
I,= M1
—�LU-0--CD LU— �, ----------------' L.---...J
uN e• a
LU-0-CD LU O-CD Y LU-O-CD LU-O-CC MI-CD
I M I
MI-co e i
LU•0-Co LU-O-CO LU-0-CD LU-0-C -
e I
ELLIS
LU-0_CD I M_ M1-0-CD
RA-CD 1_UDCD' _-- �.5 MII
i RA-0-CD ;� �D MI.
'� LU-0-CD
0-CD I RA-0-CD1 _._T '
EXISTING ZONING `.
Figure 2 - 5
15
The proposed redesignation of the area of concern to a recreation area and
subsequent acquisition by the City of Huntington Beach would not guarantee
any greater degree of open space preservation. Because the recreation area
designation allows both large natural open areas and active recreation
facilities, the current regulation of privately owned property through zoning
may be more in keeping with the goals and policies of the Open
Space/Conservation Element. On the other hand, the policy of maximizing the
outdoor and environmental potential of the City by providing comprehensive,
coordinated recreation, parks and open space programs may be furthered by
expanding Central Park to include active recreational facilities. Again, the
balance of public and private recreation and open space opportunities is the key
issue to be resolved.
2.1.5 Bolsa Chica Regional Linear Park
The County of Orange is currently preparing plans for the acquisition and
development of a regional park located around the periphery of the Bolsa Chica
lowlands. The linear park is intended to act as a buffer between developed
areas of Huntington Beach and environmentally sensitive wetlands in the Bolsa
Chica. The eastern reach of the park will incorporate and preserve the bluffs
of the Huntington Beach Mesa, offering scenic views of the lowlands from atop
the mesa.
Passive in nature, the linear park will provide trails to link Bolsa Chica State
Beach with Huntington Central Park. Both the City and County will acquire
land for the linear park, and negotiations are underway for the parcels shown in
Figure 2-6. The transition between Huntington Central Park and the linear park
and the provision of a continuous trail system linking the two would be
facilitated by expanding the park to the south in the vicinity of Edwards Street
due to the area's topography. Much of the land now owned or planned to be
acquired by the City is on a slope; only a small bluff top area is included in
Central Park on the east side of the street.
2.1.6 Ellis Avenue Realignment
The City Council has directed staff to investigate the feasibility of realigning a
portion of Ellis Avenue between Edwards and Goldenwest Streets. The
alignment being considered would curve northward about halfway between
Goldenwest and Edwards, bridge the draw and then curve around and descend
the bluff to tie into Talbert Avenue at Edwards Street. This alignment is being
analyzed along with a total circulation system for the linear park area as part
of Amendment 81-1 to the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
The proposed Ellis Avenue realignment would bisect Huntington Central Park
both in its current configuration and if the park boundary were extended south
to the existing Ellis alignment, creating a situation similar to that which the
City Council attempted to avoid by deleting Talbert Avenue through Central
Park in 1976. However, with the advent of the linear park concept and
expanded open space areas, it would be difficult to maintain a contiguous park
area and at the same time provide adequate access and circulation to and
around the park.
16
OP CE.I.,OR
MJIF Dx, ir•'+nirn nii.:
I
g� i r
6 I 6 OR
6
J
g m
I
! _
r
v�
-is Now INK
S -
p S "Fill -
L
.Amami
ILI
i
r
0
•
1
ELLIS
� I
in �1�� z
i o
tL
GARFIELD I
I
City-owned Property
Signal Dedication
Proposed County Acquisition
A!Mk
Figure 2-6
lip 17
HUNTINGTON LAKE
T LBERT
r
10
20
30
50 10
20
30
00
oolo
o cn
~'
w
\ z
a o
w 0
ELLIS
TOPOGRAPHY
Figure 2-7
18 lip
If the proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue is approved, the southerly expansion
of Central Park would facilitate the provision of an uninterrrupted system of
trails from Central Park to the linear park and beach area. This could be
achieved by using the natural topography of the encyclopedia lot area to
provide a grade separation (Figure 2-7). The construction of a bridge across the
existing draw would allow trails to pass underneath the roadway, eliminating
the need for an at-grade trail crossing at Ellis Avenue.
2.1.7 Economic Considerations
One of the most important issues to consider in analyzing the proposed
amendment to the Open Space/Conservation Element involves the cost to the
City, and its taxpayers, of acquiring, developing, operating and maintaining an
expanded Central Park area.
While some of the cost factors of supporting a 30-acre addition to Central Park
are relatively easy to estimate in economic terms, the benefits to the City and
general public are not. The City of Huntington Beach currently owns a 5-acre
parcel, approximately six acres of scattered encyclopedia lots, and just over
four acres of streets within the amendment area of concern. A total of 14 net
acres of land are to be acquired by the City if the amendment is approved. The
Community Services Department has applied for a state grant of $1,000,000 to
purchase this property. (A portion of the state grant is also planned to be used
in acquiring some scattered encyclopedia lots north of the amendment area
which, although already designated open space recreation, still remain in
private ownership). Amendment to the Open Space/Conservation Element is a
prerequisite to the City using state grant funding. Without the amendment,
only general funds may be used.
Once acquired, it is estimated that it would cost the City $40,000 to $50,000
per acre to develop the park into a useable recreation area, while retaining its
natural terrain and features. Development of more active uses would cost even
more, although revenues derived from user fees would offset some of the initial
development costs. Once the park area is acquired and developed, additional
monies will be needed for operation and maintenance of the park. According to
figures prepared in the 1980-1981 City budget, average per acre maintenance
costs for the entire 430-acre park system average $2,722 per year; however,
annual maintenance for Central Park alone averages several hundred dollars
less per acre due to extensive natural open areas which require less care.
Preliminary plans also suggest that land within the amendment area proposed
for the equestrian center may be leased by the City to an operator/developer
who will be responsible for development costs as well as partial maintenance of
the equine facilities. A consulting firm has been contracted to prepare an
environmental impact report on the approved master plan for Central Park. A
cost/revenue analysis of projected uses in the Park will also be included in the
report and will assist in more accurately projecting the costs and benefits of an
expanded park.
In addition to the costs outlined above, other cost factors involved with
designating the area of concern for park purposes include the potential loss of
property taxes on land purchased by the City, the cost of lost development
opportunities to private owners of affected parcels, and a potential increase in
police service.
19
While it is relatively easy to project the anticipated economic cost factors
associated with the proposed amendment, the benefits of a larger Central Park
area are not as easily quantified, especially in terms of dollars. While the park
may have some beneficial effect on property values in the immediate area,
most of the benefits derived from recreational open space affect the
environmental, social and psychological well-being of the community by
protecting valuable resources and providing passive areas and relief from
intensive urban development.
2.1.8 Staff Recommendation
Briefly stated, approval of the proposed amendment to the Open
Space/Conservation Element would:
1) designate an additional 30 acres of land within the City for recreation
uses, enlarging Huntington Central Park from 297 to 327 acres,
2) eliminate the possibility of residential, industrial or other
non-recreational uses within the areas affected, upon rezoning consistent
with the recreation area designation, and
3) allow public acquisition of properties within the affected areas, utilizing
local, state and federal open space and park acquisition funds and grants,
pending a change of zone to ROS.
Enlarging Central Park to 327 acres is consistent with policies originally
contained in the 1974 Policy Plan, which called for a city park of 200 to 400
acres in size. The proposed recreation area designation is also consistent with
the Land Use Element, which designates all areas north of Ellis between
Edwards Street and Sully-Miller Lake as open space.
The existing planned open space development designation in the Open
Space/Conservation Element is intended to encourage uses that are compatible
with the estate residential area south of Ellis Avenue. The proposed equestrian
center within the amendment area appears to preserve this compatibility.
The overriding issue in considering the proposed amendment involves the extent
of public acquisition of properties within the proposed expanded park boundary,
the effect on uses and land values of private properties, and the long range
impact on the City. Acquisition of the 30-acre site, while involving a major
commitment of public funds, is made more reasonable due to the availability of
state grant sources.
Based on this analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the redesignation of the 30 acres located north of Ellis Avenue, east of Edwards
Street and 630 feet west of Goldenwest Street from planned open space
development to recreation area in the Open Space/Conservation Element.
20
2.1.9 Planning Commission Recommendation
At the December 1, 1981 public hearing, the Planning Commission did not
approve the 30 acre area of concern for lack of a majority vote. The
Commission's vote was two in favor, two opposed with three abstentions. As a
result, the planned open space development designation is retained on the 30
acre area located north of Ellis Avenue, east of Edwards Street, and 630 feet
west of Goldenwest Street.
2.2 MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES
Since the Open Space/Conservation Element was adopted in 1976, a number of
changes have taken place regarding the system of neighborhood parks. Ten new
parks have been added and five relocated. In addition, 11 undeveloped park
sites have been recommended for deletion.
The Community Services Department is recommending deletion of Wieder
neighborhood park site from the Open Space/Conservation Plan (Figure
2-8 ). Revenues from the sale of the site are to be eventually used in
purchasing property for the future expansion of Central Park.
2.2.1 Wieder Park Site
Wieder Park Site (#775), dedicated to the City in 1971, is located at the
northwest corner of Saybrook and Santa Barbara Lane. Identified in the Open
Space/Conservation Element as Huntington Harbour Park Site and later
renamed Wieder Park Site, the City plans to sell this 2.5 acre parcel at the
same time the Ocean View School District proposes to sell their adjacent
15-acre school site in 1982.
2.2.2 Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Wieder Park site be deleted from the Open
Space/Conservation Element.
2.2.3 Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends that the Wieder Park site be deleted
from the Open Space/Conservation Element.
21
F DINDER AVE I L
i - -
77
,nIIV.X, - - "— -- --
. .�PRELUDE DR C F—
E
5 ON.O =CN:1"•Ll KON�R
°v TCHow ow
HILO CR.
I��- �•'�:�"j: MINUET R —0
KAUl DR..
is ....... I �
MAUL .
RHAPSODY DR. CR
DP Z
'1'� r _ I110NTEREY..•.
S 4r1
CF R a 0 R TTA DR. OANU DR.
_ W i -
_ °R - o 2 ;
a�
SCENARIO OR
V\
C< O C C D
CF-R
II HEIR - - AVE
rOQ� Crfi1511ANA BAY �.: —�1 y( 1
1 CF-R CF-E
STAR
_ OP
_Z PwA pti
PICKWI'K
CF-R
1� DRANFOR -/ wE --
� j I AL N 4PV 3� 2
I C 1 CF•R a� _;
6 I;. ::' ... PEARCE ST.
w B :CyoeY;a"i
I= _ DALE OR an .tA
CF R IMAH ow
_ BOARDWALK DR.
3 U i _ •
CFR 3 ,K1 LV �- — MILo T =
DAVENPORT i �J II [ R
• 2 o a- IZ� 1 /J ..� I a
_ 4 I I
e/ O CF'R_oo i �a° � �I�_ �S�OR o_ m
Zi
WARNER AVE
o f
WIEDER PARK SITE
1•ti� FivSf
<,.:.;' A .:::'. Figure 2 8
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
3.1 Physical Features
3.1.1 Topography/Soils
As described in Section 2.1.3, the area of concern is characterized by small hills
and draws west of Goldenwest Street. The proposed amendment would restrict
residential development and would allow public acquisition, which generally
could be expected to protect the area from development and substantial
alteration of the existing landform. Any alteration of existing topography and
soils associated with development of the proposed equestrian center will be
analyzed in the Central Park EIR.
3.1.2 Geology/Seismicity
The amendment area is generally located within the Newport-Inglewood
Structural Fault Zone. Three active faults run through this zone -- the north
and south branches of the Newport-Inglewood Fault and the Bolsa-Fairview
Fault. The amendment area lies just south of the Bolsa-Fairview to the west of
Goldenwest Street.
23
The Newport-Inglewood Zone is a relatively young fault system comprised of
numerous short, discontinuous, and intertwined faults located deep in the
bedrock beneath the Orange County coastal plain. The Bolsa-Fairview Fault is
one of three known faults in Huntington Beach considered to be geologically
active and subject to possible future surface rupture. This potentials
considered to be greater in the northern portion of the City, and the area of
concern is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Special Study
Zone. Liquefaction potential within the area of concern is considered to be low
due to the site's elevation on the Huntington Beach mesa, lack of near-surface
groundwater, and soil with high clay content. Appropriate structural
requirements should be imposed by the City to minimize potential earthquake
damage, which could include limiting placement of structures within 50 feet of
the Bolsa-Fairview Fault.
3.1.3 Hydrology/Drainage
The majority of the amendment area drains into the three natural lakes in
Central Park. Redesignation of the area to recreation is not expected to have a
significant impact on existing drainage patterns.
3.1.4 Vegetation/Wildlife Habitat
The majority of the amendment area is vacant and characterized by low weedy
growth. Redesignation of the area for incorporation into Central Park would
most likely bring about replacement of existing vegetation with grass, trees and
ground cover similar to the existing developed park area.
3.2 Land Use and Zoning
Impacts discussed in 2.1.4.
3.3 Traffic and Circulation
Traffic impacts associated with the proposed amendment are difficult to assess
with any specificity due to the range of uses allowed under the recreation
designation. Open space uses in the area would generate between 135 and 331
daily trips, based on observed traffic from neighborhood and community parks.
Development of active commercial recreational uses could be expected to
generate as much if not more traffic than residential uses; however, a separate
EIR is necessary to evaluate impacts of development of specific park uses.
3.4 Air duality
Air quality impacts are generally a function of vehicle emissions associated
with traffic generated by various land uses. The above section indicates that
traffic generated by passive open space uses is nearly two-thirds less than
traffic generated by development under existing zoning; therefore, the proposed
amendment could be expected to slightly improve air quality. Like traffic
impacts, air quality impacts associated with more active commercial uses need
to be addressed in greater detail in the Central Park EIR.
24
3.5 Noise
Noise sources in and around the amendment area include traffic noise from
arterials, oil operations, the mushroom farm and fire training facility, Orange
County transfer station, Police heliport and pistol range, and the Southern
Pacific Railroad. The proposed amendment may have the long term effect of
reducing noise by designating additional areas for public acquisition and park
development.
3.6 Archaeology
Portions of the amendment area are located near the bluffs of the Huntington
Beach Mesa, and therefore may contain archaeological artifacts associated with
Indians that once inhabited this area. Designation of the area for public
acquisition would allow closer monitoring of conditions in the amendment area
and faciliate preservation and exploration of midden areas.
3.7 Public Service
Impacts discussed in Section 2.1.7.
3.8 Economics
Impacts discussed in Section 2.1.7.
3.9 Alternatives
Central Park Expansion
Open Space Zoning - The area of concern is already designated as open space in
the Land Use Element. This area could be rezoned to Recreational Open Space
(ROS) in order to restrict residential use and provide for compatible activities
and uses. Rezoning properties to ROS without amending the Open
Space/Conservation Element would not, however, allow the City to take
advantage of state and federal sources for additional acquisitions.
Alternative Location - The conceptual park master plan proposes a variety of
equestrian uses for the area of concern -- stables, a rodeo arena, a show ring, a
trails system -- that might feasibly be located elsewhere in the City or in the
adjacent Bolsa Chica Linear Park. Under this alternative, equestrian facilities
could be located outside Central Park and valuable open space preserved at the
same time.
No Project - The current boundaries of Central Park could be retained until a
decision is made on the nature of development and proposed uses for adjacent
properties currently designated in a planning "mode". This could allow a more
comprehensive planning effort in balancing active and passive uses within
Central Park.
Miscellaneous Change
The park site recommended for deletion could be designated for alternative
locations or retained in the Open Space/Conservation Element.
25
3.10 Relationship Between Local Short-term Uses of Man's Environment and the
Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-term Productivity.
Amendment of the Open Space/Conservation Element as proposed would have
more long-term than short-term impacts by prohibiting residential and other
non-recreational uses and by improving the City's ability to acquire property for
the preservation and enjoyment of the open space. By preserving the area as
recreation open space, long-term productivity is enhanced through harmonious
development and proper maintenance practices.
3.11 Irreversible or Unavoidable Environmental Changes
The irreversible or unavoidable environmental changes associated with the
proposed amendment are speculative at this time. While the amendment itself
would cause no changes, the implementation of a development plan could bring
about changes. These changes are to be addressed in a separate EIR on the
Central Park Master Plan.
3.12 Growth Inducing Impacts
The proposed amendment to the Open 'Space/Conservation Element will have no
significant growth inducing impacts, and may actually have the opposite impact
by restricting residential uses within the Central Park area of concern. The
deletion of one park site may have long-range growth inducing impacts. The
Wieder site could potentially be developed as a residential area if the park
designation is deleted from the Open Space/Conservation Element. The one
site, which totals 2.5 acres, could support a maximum of 17 units if developed
at low density.
26
• � to
Huntington Pacific Corporation • ¢3!-/
2110 MAIN STREET • PHONE 960.4351
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648
December 21 , 1981
c
n
Huntington Beach City Council
Attention : Mr. Charles W. Thompson �+"`m
City Administrator
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
JJ C�
Honorable Council Members & Administrator: cn
The Huntington Pacific Corporation (HPac Corp) would like to express its
opposition to Open Space and Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 , specifically
as it concerns the proposed designation as a recreation area and inclusion
into Huntington Central Park of thirty acres of land, five acres of which are
owned by HPac Corp located at the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and
Edwards Street. The present designation of said land is Planned Open Space
Development.
This property was purchased in 1977, in reliance upon the City Council ' s
decision• in 1975 to limit property acquisition for Central Park to a line
660 feet north of El*'] is Avenue. In 1979, the Community Services Department
proposed expanding Central Park for the purpose of developing active revenue-
producing uses to offset the City's increasing park maintenance costs. An
economic feasibility analysis conducted by Ultrasystems in 1980-81
concluded that without the development of major commercial recreational
facilities, revenues would not be adequate to offset Central Park acquisition
and development costs, let alone maintenance costs for the City' s park system.
On August 17, 1981 , the City Council reviewed master plan alternatives for
Central Park, and. took action to eliminate several proposed revenue-producing
uses and to reduce the proposed park expansion from 75 acres to 30 acres.
Although the five-acre parcel at the northeast corner of Ellis and Edwards was
recommend d for inclusion into Central Park, the Council voted not to use park
acquisition and development funds at this time, but rather to acquire the
property through dedication at such time other property in the area was developed.
The Huntington Pacific Corporation has no immediate plans to develop this five-
acre parcel , nor does it own sufficient property in the vicinity of Central Park
to incur a dedication requirement of five acres of land. It is therefore
unlikely that the parcel in question can be acquired by dedication. By retaining
the existing .designation of planned open space development, there is some
incentive that the parcel could be developed compatibly with surrounding properties.
Sincerel ,
a
t G.:'J.,-'GOODW I N
l Vijce/President
WDH/gb i l �
Huntington Pacific Corporation I�I
2110 MAIN STREET - P.HONE 960.4351
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648
December 21., 1981
c
C
Huntington Beach City Council
Attention: Mr. Charles W. Thompson `;
' Cit Administrator.
� Ir2
Y ��,
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 --V
y )
Honorable' Council Members Administrator: ¢'
The Huntington Pacific Corporation (HPac Corp) would like to express its
opposition to Open Space and Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 , specifically
as it concerns the proposed designation as a recreation area and inclusion
into Huntington Central Park of thirty acres of land, five acres of which are
.owned by HPac Corp located at the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and
Edwards Street, The present designation of said land is Planned Open Space
Development.
This property was purchased in 1977, in reliance upon the City Council 's
decision- in 1975 to limit property acquisition for Central Park to a line
660 feet north of Ellis Avenue. In 1979, the Community Services Department
proposed expanding Central Park for the purpose of developing active revenue-
producing uses to offset the City's increasing park maintenance costs. An
economic feasibility analysis conducted by Ultrasystems in 1980-81
concluded that without the development of major commercial recreational
facilities, revenues would not be adequate to offset Central Park acquisition
and development costs, let alone maintenance costs for the City's park system.
On August 17, 1981 , the City Council reviewed master plan alternatives for
Central Park, and took action to eliminate several proposed revenue-producing
uses and to reduce the proposed park expansion from 75 acres to 30 acres.
Although the five-acre parcel at the northeast corner of Ellis and Edwards was
recommended for inclusion into Central Park, the Council voted not to use park
acquisition and development funds at this time, but rather to acquire the
property through dedicat-i.on at such time other property in the area was developed.
The Huntington Pacific Corporation has no immediate plans to develop this five-
acre parcel , nor does it own sufficient property in the vicinity of Central Park
to incur a dedication requirement of five acres of land. It is therefore
unlikely that the parcel in question can be acquired by .dedication. By .retaining
the existing designation of planned open space development, there is some
incentive that the parcel could be developed compatibly with surrounding properties.
S i nce,re 1 ,
G,-"J./GOO DW I N
Vi/ce//Pres i dent
WDH/gb �.
IN THE `Y,
Superior Court �{
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA U
In and for the County of Orange r d t,vl
t)
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY. CLERK
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Hearing 81-1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
State of California ) OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION
Count of O )ss. ELEMENT AMENDMENT 81-1 AND
y Orange g NEGATIVE DECLARATION 81-47
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a
public hearing will be held by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
Rita J. Richter in the Council Chamber of the Civic Cen-
ter,Huntington Beach,at the hour of 7:30
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of P.M.,or as soon thereafter as possible on
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I Monday,the 21st day of December,1981,
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; for the purpose of considering Open
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Space Conservation Element Amendment
o.81-1,a proposal to change the Gen-
eral Plan Designation on some 30 acres
located south of Huntington Central
Huntington Beach Ind. Review Park, east of edwards street, north of
Ellis Avenue and 630 feet west of Golden-
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of west Street from Open Space Develop-
ment to Recreation.Said hearing will also
Huntington Beach consider proposed`.deletion of Wieder
Park Site,located at the northwest corner
of Saybrook and Santa Barbara'Lanes,
County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the from the Open Space/Conservation Plan
Negative Declaration 81-47 will also be
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- considered in conjunction with said Open
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had Space/Conservation Plan.
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, Further information may be obtained
from
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- Servicese Department of Development
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a All interested persons are invited to
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the attend said hearing and express theiropinions for or against said Open Space/
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular Conservation Element Amendment No.
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement 81-1 and ND 8147.
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: Further information may be obtained
from the Office of the City Clerk,2000
Main Street,Huntington Beach,,Califor-
nia 92648—(714)536-5227.
DATED December 4,1981.
December 10, 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
By.ALICIA M.WENTWORTH
City Clerk
Pub.Dec.10,1981
_taunt Beach Ind.Rev.tt10044
1 certify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego-
ing is true and correct.
Dated at......................Gar.d en..G ro v e........
Califor . ,t ' .10A h.day otT).e c....... 8.1.....
Signature
( Form No.CAF-81380
i
REQUE FOR CITY COUNC ACTION
Date December 21, 1981
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Services
Subject: OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1
I
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment No. 81-1 constitutes the
first amendment to the Open Space/Conservation Element of the
General Plan for 1981 . The amendment includes two areas of concern:
1. The proposed redesignation of approximately 30 acres of land
located north of Ellis Avenue., east of Edwards Street, and
630 feet west of Goldenwest Street from Open Space Development
to Recreation, and
2. The proposed deletion of the Wieder Park Site from the Open
Space/Conservation Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 81-47
and recommended City Council approval by the following vote:
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK, SECOND BY SCHUMACHER:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Mahaffey, Schumacher
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Paone, Bannister
The Planning Commission. took separate straw votes on each amend-
ment request item. These votes are included in the attached
draft minutes from the Planning Commission' s November 17, 1981
and December 1, 1981 meetings.
It should be noted that the proposed 30-acre expansion of Central
Park (Area 2.1) did not receive the required number of straw votes
to recommend approval or denial of the item to the City Council .
A record of the Planning Commission' s discussion on this item is
also included in the attached draft minutes.
i
PIO 4/81
OPEN SPACE, Cont.
December 21, 1981
Page 2
The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 1280 (as amended
by the straw votes) recommending City Council adoption of Open
Space/Conservation Element Amendment 81-1 by the following vote:
ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY PORTER:
AYES: Schumacher, Kenefick, Porter, Winchell, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Paone, Bannister
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5055
1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 81-47.
2. Approve the proposed deletion of the Wieder Park Site, Item 2. 2,
from the Open Space/Conservation Plan.
3 . Approve the recommendations of the Planning Commission and
adopt by resolution Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment
No. 81-1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5054
The Department of Development Services staff recommends approval
of Items 2. 1, 2. 2 and Negative Declaration No. 81-47 .
ANALYSIS:
Both areas of concern are analyzed in detail in the amendment re-
port forwarded with this Request for Council Action. Draft minutes
from the Planning Commission' s public hearings on Open Space/ Con-
servation Element Amendment No. 81-1 are contained in Attachment 3 .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
As determined by the City' s Environmental Review Committee, Nega-
tive Declaration No. 81-47 was prepared for Open Space/Conservation
Element Amendment No. 81-1. Negative Declaration No. 81-47 was
posted for a 10-day review period ending on November 22, 1981.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council may adopt the requested changes as recommended,
modify them as desired, or retain the existing designations in
the Open Space/Conservation Element.
OPEN SPACE, Cont.
December 21, 1981
Page 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment No. 81-1
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1280
3 . Draft minutes from public hearing before the Planning Commission
on Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment No. 81-1
4. Resolution for City Council to adopt
JWP:BA:jlm
MINUTES
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers, Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1981 - 7:00 PM
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bannister, Kenefick, Paone (7 : 10) , Winchell,
Porter (7 : 20) , Schumacher, Mahaffey
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None
CONSENT AGENDA:
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY MAHAFFEY THE CONSENT AGENDA,
CONSISTING OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 3,
1981, WAS APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Paone, Porter
ABSTAIN: Bannister
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
None.
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS:
OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 (Cont. from 11-17-81)
Applicant: City of Huntington Beach
A proposal to change the General Plan designation on some 30
acres located south of Huntington Central Park, east of Edwards
Street, north of Ellis Avenue, and 630 feet west of Goldenwest
Street from open space development to open space recreation. Said
hearing will also consider proposed deletion of two undeveloped
park sites: Wieder Park site, located at the northwest corner of
Saybrook and Santa Barbara Lanes, and Irby Park site, located
south of Heil Avenue on Dale Vista Lane.
Chuck Clark discussed the supplemental information prepared for the
Commission and the maps designed to show the relationship between
the proposed realignment of Ellis Avenue to Talbert •ana .the topo-
graphical configuration of the area .north of Ellis and7how the
Minutes, H.B. Planninoommis!pjon •
December 1, 1981
Page 2
small lot areas in the general location related to the proposed street
extension. The proposed extension, it was noted, would run through
all three of the small lot areas contained in the 30 acres under •con-
sideration in the amendment.
Secretary Palin explained the staff had recommended that both Irby
and Wieder Park sites be pulled out of this amendment at the November
17 meeting; with Wieder Park to be added to the first amendment in the
next ye-ar. However, as this amendment could not be set for the Decem-
ber 7, 1981 City Council meeting because of the prior continuance, the
staff now recommends that Wieder Park site be acted on by the Commis-
sion at this time. Irby Park will not return to the Commission as a
deletion from the Open Space/Conservation Element, but will be brought
back before the Commission as a conformance with the General Plan once
the Community Services Commission has made a determination as to how
much acreage. it may wish to have declared surplus by the City Council.
The Community Services Commission is scheduled to review. the Irby Park
question at its second meeting in January.
Chairman Winchell assured the audience that the Planning Commission
would pull that conformance item off the consent agenda and give
anyone who might wish to address the matter an opportunity to speak
at that time. In an ensuing discussion as to whether or not the
public hearing should be reopened on these items, considering the
staff ' s recommendations to pull them from the amendment, an unidenti-
fied gentleman .from the audience spoke on this issue. He stated
that those people present who had come in regard to Irby Park should
have a right to protect the record by giving public input at this
meeting. He contended as well that the public hearing on the matter
had been specifically continued to the present meeting from Novem-
ber 17th.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER AND SECONDED BY MAHAFFEY TO APPROVE
BY STRAW VOTE AREA 2. 1, THE 30-ACRE AREA LOCATED NORTH OF ELLIS
AVENUE FOR A CHANGE OF GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION FROM OPEN SPACE, DE-
VELOPMENT, TO OPEN SPACE, RECREATION, FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY
COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION.
Ensuing discussion considered the question of possible "downzoning, "
how compensation for the properties would be accomplished, and the
question of procedure in the event no majority vote could be obtained
at this meeting.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BANNISTER AND SECONDED BY MAHAFFEY THAT OPEN
SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 BE TABLED. MOTION
FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Bannister
NOES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, . Schumacher, Mahaffey
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Paone
-2- 12-1-81 - P,C.
Minutes., H.B. Aning Commtssi.on •
December 1, 1981
Page 3
THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AREA 2 .1 BY STRAW
VOTE,FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Winchell, Schumacher
NOES: Kenefick, Mahaffey
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bannister, Paone, Porter
Discussion of Irby Park site followed. It was noted that the
delineation of the park site in the Open Space/Conservation
Element does not state its size or draw boundaries; and that
it is not the intent of the Community Services Commission to
delete the entire park, but only a portion thereof.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER THAT
ALL REFERENCE TO IRBY PARK SITE BE DELETED FROM THE DOCUMENTA-
TION FOR OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 .
In response to a request from a member of the audience for
clarification on subsequent procedure, the Chairman repeated
her commitment that the item would be pulled from the consent
agenda of whichever meeting it was scheduled for and additional
opportunity given the public to speak. , Legal counsel Folger
indicated that in his opinion it would not be timely to take
further public input at this meeting. Suggestions were put
forward to ensure that those interested persons would be given
a time to speak on the matter, including suggestions for noti-
fication, appeal to the City Council, or making the matter a-
public hearing before the Planning Commission. The member of
the audience inquired if the deletion would also include dele-
tion of any mention of the park site from the EIR and was
assured that .all terminology relating to Irby Park site would be
deleted totally in the analysis section of the document as well
as in the environmental section, thus preserving all rights of
the public in regard to said deletion. The gentleman then in-
quired as to the finding the Commission is making on Irby Park,
expressing the opinion that the deletion of even a portion of
the park would require an amendment to the General Plan, not a
conformance hearing. It was again explained that the park re-
mains in the element after the Commission' s action exactly as
it has always been, because the element does not deal with the
acreage of the site.
THE STRAW VOTE FOR DELETION OF IRBY PARK FROM THE AMENDMENT
81-1 CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: -Kenefzick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bannister, Paone.
Commissioner Kenefick directed that the record show that all
persons present at the meeting of November 17, 1981 who spoke
in regard to Wieder Park were in favor of having that park site
deleted.
-3 12-1-81 - P.C.
Minutes, H.B. Planniocommi.ssipn •
December 1, 1981
Page 4
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY MAHAFFEY THE COMMISSION RECOM-
MENDED THAT THE WIEDER PARK SITE BE DELETED FROM THE OPEN SPACE/
CONSERVATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW.
VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bannister, Paone, Porter
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NO. 81-47 WAS APPROVED WITH THE DELETION OF ALL REFERENCE TO IRBY
PARK SITE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bannister, Paone
ON MOTION BY. SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY PORTER RESOLUTION NO. 1280
WAS APPROVED WITH THE CHANGES AS OUTLINED BY THE PRIOR STRAW VOTES,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Bannister, Paone
Staff will amend the resolution to reflect the concerns and votes of
the Commission and transmit a record of the action at this. meeting
to the City Council.
i �•
B. Planning Commotion •
N ember 17, .1981
Pag 4
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: one
ABSENT: B nister, Paone, Porter
ABSTAIN: Non
A MOTION WAS MAD BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY HAFFEY TO APPROVE
CERTIFICATION OF T PORTION OF EIR 81-6 TH ADDRESSES AREA 2. 1
OF THE LAND USE ELE NT AMENDMENT NO. 81- , ' BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Win ell, Schumac r, Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter
ABSTAIN: None
A MOTION WAS MADE BY KENEFICK SECONDED BY MAHAFFEY TO DENY
CERTIFICATION OF THE PORTIO OF E 81-6 THAT ADDRESSES AREA 2. 2
OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT DMENT N 81-3, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Wi hell, Schumache Mahaffey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bannister Paone, Porter
ABSTAIN: None
ON MOTION BY S UMACHER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK ND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT NO 81-3 AS AMENDED BY THE COMMISSION' PRIOR STRAW VOTES
WAS APPROV FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCI BY THE ADOPTION
OF AMENDE RESOLUTION NO. 1279, BY THE FOLLOWING VOT
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES None
AB NT: Bannister, Paone, Porter
STAIN: None
OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1
Initiated by Development Services Community Services
The primary amendment request involves enlarging Huntington Central
Park by approximately 30 acres. This is a request to change t1he....General
Plan designation on 30 acres located south of Huntington Central Park,
east of Goldenwest Street, north of Ellis Avenue and 630 feet west
of Goldenwest Street, . from open space development to open space
recreational- (Area 1) . The second portion considers proposed de-
letion of two undeveloped park sites--Weider and Irby Parks (Area 2) .
The public hearing was opened pertaining to Area 1 (30 additional
acres added to Huntington Central .Park) . The following persons
spoke in opposition to the request:
Marvin Nacklaus
David Dahl
Mr. Laster
Gary Turlman
Una Palajac
-4- 11-17-81 - P.C.
a H.B. Planning Commission
November 17, 1981 •
Page 5
The public hearing was closed on this portion (Area 1) .
Commission discussion took place regarding the various studies
that 'are being conducted, one in particular by Ultrasystems. ,
Commissioner Mahaffey questioned why the City is trying to pur-
chase property from people who do not want to sell it-to generate
the revenue needed. Secretary Palin stated that the courts would
have to decide these matters.
Mr. Mahaffey made a motion to deny certification of Resolution
No. 1280. This motion failed for lack of a second.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MAHAFFEY AND ' SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO RECOM-
MEND NON-APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE OF THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
ON THE 30 ACRES IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK. THE MOTION FAILED
FOR LACK OF FOUR AFFIRMATIVE VOTES, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Mahaffey
NOES: Winchell, Schumacher
ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter
ABSTAIN: None
This portion of the Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment was
automatically continued to the next regular meeting due to- the
lack of four affirmative votes.
Staff recommended that in order to allow the Community Services
Commission additional time to consider possible modifications to
the two proposed park deletions, as well as to give the City Coun=
cil the opportunity for a more thorough analysis, that this item
be continued to the first Open Space/Conservation Element Amend-
ment of 1982.
Chairman Winchell, however, opened the public hearing on this
issue and further stated that the hearing would remain opened.
.Speaking in opposition to the deletion of Irby Park Site were the
following persons:
Jim Valkar
Gerald Klein
Deborah Klein
Speaking in favor of deletion of Weider Park Site was Mr. Burdette
Hallett, who felt that development of the site would more benefit
the surrounding area.
ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY MAHAFFEY AREA 2 OF OPEN SPACE/
CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING
OF DECEMBER 1, 1981, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey
NOES: None
-5- 11-17-81 - P.C.
r • •
December 10, 1981
City Council
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
RE: Appeal of Huntington Beach Planning Commission
Irby Park
Findings and Action of December 1 , 1981
Dear Honorable Council Persons:
Enclosed herewith please find an appeal of the planning
commission decision dated December 1, 1981 regarding
the deletion of Irby Park from the general plan.
If you have any questions regarding this appeal, please
do not hesitate to give my office a call. Thank you
for your consideration in this matter.
Si cerely,
Residents f Huntington
Beach concerned with Irby
Park
BY: Gerald L. Klein
9252 Garden Grove Blvd. , Suite 2
Garden Grove, CA 92644
GLK/clb
Enclosures
160 petition signatures
,a
December 10, 1981
City Council
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
RE : Appeal of Huntington Beach Planning Commission
Irby Park
Findings and Action of December 1, 1981
FACTS
Open space/conservation element amendment No. 81-1 included the
deletion of "undeveloped neighborhood park sites from the open
space conservation plan (item 2 . 2. 1) . This portion of the
proposed amendment was removed by the planning commission and
returned to staff for further action pursuant to staff' s recom-
mendation.
The commission made a finding that to delete the Irby Park
site did not require an amendment of the general plan but
could be done by a resolution of conformance.
ACTION APPEALED
The commission finding that to delete all or a portion of Irby
Park does not require an amendment to the general plan is in
error. We, therefore, hereby, appeal that finding to City
Council.
BASIS OF APPEAL
The Irby Park lands in question have been expressly dedicated
as public park lands pursuant to Government Code 66477 and
Huntington Beach ordinance code Article 9740. Section 66477
(b) and (d) specifically incorporate and make a part of any
general plan any lands dedicated pursuant to its provisions.
Trot It l c7 N
CONCERNING 8 ACRES O UNDEVELOPED LAND OWNED BY E CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH, Z Cl-R, ON DALE VISTA LAN A TRACT
BORDERTD BY THE FOLL .ING STREETS : WARNER, GO.LDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND. ° O�
n The following propert y owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer. We are also opposed to
any use of this property other than for the originally intended
park for the following reasons : �
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and 51
e'
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes.
3. Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional privacy
We request along with all other petitioners, that an environmental
. impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient.
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
q CV
I �
4 . 0
�,•L
5 .
7 . Z)
8 . /<21
9 .
1/o/L
12 . /-',. :.�: i j�,,;`= /c"--L=-''��/-'�� .._> '/i %���'�/c' Cc.�,^,,�✓'li��✓� %Z�: �/�y
13_. �' . '( 1 :fir . I l: �( �• r:( c' �,
i
17VIITI.iGT0IN -:ACIi ;) C . - . V ; :?
!3C�tJ ;i� ?'� C '':i n1,i,Q :i;,'' ;;T:;':,,�. . :.';ri,. ..:t G''%,hT: ; .'.I T,. L,
The followin; rronerLy o•.:ncro in `r )rfi are on:)o:3od Le, Lr:e
sale of this, pro_)erty to are :il.:,o o:)po:;e.. to
ru);j ,i:_e of thi? property other L1i:Tn for t:c.: ori�.ilialIy ir.t,cnt ea
park for the follo;:i:ng rea ,,=iS
1 liddit,ional 1,.om,,: '.n this ai'OC :!mild J!,:;rea:�e trai'fic %-
no'.,
llrv�;l..r,:1t^nt; of arol t:o>>1, d ,r r;:. , the V�:1.110 oi'
in;.; 1�cmos „
j. l'ro >cr :its, a� ^crnt to a-,id acrns,::; C'r or, Lii:i.:; lot .-jero nur-
chased their locution r. I . :'c i- tf;c;ir u(Iditiona].
1)riV. c;
�
(i,>!i`�, L•�Iti��, �97 / l� �ii r1i 1/ ���y /��l/� 1/0u,r/1
J•
1�U =� �'1� U �,^c�.�� l'�'► L(JIM /VA . \11 C 14
`3'- �v ��,I�.1N �/✓.
6. —---
I�cCl!V 11 t-12 Iv11 l-L 2
100
A, 7
13.
cell
i
S
• 7-� ( n r, Tr,i � I"Yli�.l / . ' r1 •r r'l l' (i i'r
CONIC'E :1111iG 8 Ali' nl I ) .1.: •i.r_
IIUNTIiiGT01i '3 ACHT - ;D -
C3( U':i�F'U Ei,' `Piii, !'UI,I,�':Ii;'' :T:� '.,,�� . Cr(`i,i;i. , .:r;:�T T L,
The following nro'ei`Ly o-.: 1!'rj in '_:; i;?",.)rfi aril ()•)_7o:;ed i;U I.;h0
sale of this property to are zl.:,c o:)nosoJ to
any rztie o.f %15. 3 nrC'r:•erty other t'-:an . o: t:tc. ori. .ir,all ' intnnci
park for the £.ollm inr reaaons
1 . AcIdi tional n.omr".S ;n thi:3 ai,oa ..01u.'A .i , cruace. E'raif is
nOlL;C: .
�e De'v,Aor.r-cnt or ,;'rl1J f1I'nil :10'.]lU ClO''I'('t.:.;C tlae V'�11iC) of C::i• i•-
ln,, hc-,cs e
3. Proi->er tics ad ir...ccnt to grid acre:3:3 i'r'o; i Lilis lot :rere pur-
chased bcca-,:3e t:�' their location aind .'car tl_icir additional
privacy,
SIGNAT - �,: :i ----
2.
In Ct'1
IA
4.
��� c�t,� �..� � . l �� �-l-Cr�/a�l-►�S ct� //Sc�.0 ,�.2 �� .j � /�'/�4�C' /�
6 — --`� Y -, ------ - -- - - ---
n ` f�1
�i'1= �i�<t� 1•�/ _.� �l-r;. ref.— �.1n1—G 7 ''Cam"/
JNTi,
8.
zz
AJ
All
1
r
13 20,Mn- 7� 4g6c V
r
1 '
r,(��z r�. l 6��� /6 7 31 /0 Pi el c �c� "►<
�c
• COI�CT'ai:IiJ i 8 A^A, OF, i'tIn'"!1'• (, !. .., i : •.;. .i;.
KM,ITTNC,TGIi 3'-,AC11
i'CZUF;cZ:'� THE i'OLLO-Ti :.;T:?';;',l' : . ;i?;. ,.. , Gr`1,I;
The fol-lowin- property ()'.: i11 i.:1.: IFi ;irt are; on. ,,o:md LC., I;Cle.
sale of this prop::i't-1 to are :Z1..:>c• onoosed to
any use of `.i-li.3 proprrt,y other taan inton(sC•-i
part, for the follo+:!ing reasons
1 . I;dGitiol:. l 1''.ODl(`r.; in this area .)ou:'..cl ,._reare traCfic -!-A
noi.s(-: .
c^'... DeL'Ulorn.lcnt Of t ]:L3 r1I'Ca "' !)!..li. CI.'•:'i' '..:,(,' thr, v':].110 C1 C:':'1.:�•-
i.n hc�lcs ,
3. 1'ro,>el ties ad r.t .cnt to wid acre:,:, fr'o::l lot .-iera pur-
chased occal,se r)L-' their locatioli anO ;'Ov tlj(;i.r aCUli.tiona).
privacy.
SIGNATURE PR� :i' i' ?': A...DR?:U
1 .
.Zri
C�u
J
n
---- �f ��- t-'�-�•Z-' �-,•mot./--
���
F i A rm 1 P.f►UF-
10.
12.
13.
14•
COI%T(;EMJN-v 6 ACIP np- 7TT4DI'I D
J1UNTTNGTOI-I Bl'ACHY V,
I Lit
3, 01RD7,A37D TT,` PH!" -'O!,J,0- 17! T.:
?y G C
ITIIA 9'D 3
The followin,rr pronci,Ly o-.,,P.crs 'Ur,I�rt a r e o,),,)o:,o a to th-e
sale of thiS Pro-),,lx,'U--v- to ,1 Lltevolc-,,,f�r. 7,o aro aloo onoo-c--,,(! E o
3 property other tlian for t;i�-,
any use of thj-.-- rQT,
park fo.- the f ollo,-,:ring reasons
1 . zlcl,ditional !,n thi:3 ai,oa j ,.,ci-cace ti,aMc ar I
not
,"D
Dove loom-nt of t,111,3 '11'0,1 tho U.1, 0::i.; ,-
inG 1-icrics
3- Pr,opci--tic-s qcIjj:-.tco.nt to and acr-,):3:� "i-oi:i Liii:, lot wero pur-
chased bccaiij,I-- of their location :-in(l th(;J.r additional
SIGNATU'P'E' R-
V�6 X17 -
16 101,1
2e
x
I- & Z- /I k1 1) 66SI 100 ,/oIj
)4
r .
6.
PW
Zr
v
10.
-A, r
A,
i'�j/� fN/G.-CjN�c.o' /�x.G:�^-�� --G'LO/-L j 1�Lt.�•)v / I � _ .
12.
7
le�
)avrez e,,
COlil;T.:RJl,%TG Aclle C)P T",11" J
VT
It
; CRi) ,i3"?) �-.• i':i;, -'(`� .j , :1 ..'; T.}•., ,_'.� •..1.it:. , ;; 1,i,. . : ... ,::T, ll�f
The followin,, pro?-)c:. ly o,.-t:c'r i;1 i r'.:! arf; o:):7o:;od o .i ;'_e
sale of thi- to : c l r. e are 11.:,.. onx)os ,c! t.o
:.i j pro�)er -y othor :,�:. foi, i-:,c. orir-.i:)ally in+.nnoc:
any aa. c of -_
p,zri,, i'cr the follr.:.l z. rcaooris .
1 . A(_lr?itior,,-Ll r0rill( n this arue .i ,.,rcaco trai'fic _l
noi�;c: .
^e Dev(•io' ,,i nt o' _i.J arca tllo
].',i' hOn(o3 ,
3. 1'rn_>er ,ies. ad j !.c:-nt to ar,ri c1 r 1 , o: : t':) 'J.ot :;ere pur-
chased hccal%�, cif their l.ocntinn ;.tn!, ::' z l,c;?.r additi.-)nal.
1i17'7.V: cy
OlaL7�:7f�joltf�;�� ��C2T Lcr� e�1vi��r7iY!<�.7'�c�l
1 -r)�pJCLC fwrr+ kr c(c•,�e. rrci -0 Czny ✓)cnNeer1-a410111 ( Cle'l��l�1OJ' -- 4)
1 .
- ,d /i,'�c'�.r�.L��` `✓ /`_� I/`�, �' _t„s._iJ_!�'L'1�i4'L- / G�__>;_,C_j _ l:_�;Y:�= G�/1 j�C--
2 .
Ile �l I
14 , f
6e —
��� .,u �//-�- /j�/j'--� .: r , G`����G� �bbOG ��n,�/✓/yip✓ �
7 0/
LZ
9.
10.
-_ _ -- --—
' - —12.
iY
-71
13.
14 e �'
1 T' 177.0 l"D
CONCERNING 8 ACF*OF UNDEVELOPED LAND OWNEM&Y THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH�ONED CF-R, ON DALE VISTAIRME IN A TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS : WARNER, GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer. We are also opposed to
any use of this property other than for the originally intended
park for the following reasons : •
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes.
3. Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional privacy
Me request along with all other petitioners, that an environmental
impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient.
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
2 .
C,
• 3L7 M�n.VI �� �•� .3Rr�n/ C 1�1 P,r�I1,11 / b / ! +1 `"L. �`Ca ��+•��� C.
zc.
lit. ZZ
r ,.r
L..'l\� nC
r �
�J C
CONCERNING 8 AC,$OF UNDEVELOPED LAND OWNEr THE CITY OF
` MUN•TINGTON BEACH, ONED CF-R, ON ' DALE VISTA EVE IN A TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS : WARNER, GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer. We are also opposed to
any- use of this property other than for the originally intended'
park for the following reasons :
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes.
3. Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional. privacy
We request along with all other petitioners, that an environmental
impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient.
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
2iL. 4. 2
4 .6
cv
1.44-
5 8.
6.
-' y f
i
9 .
10.
11.
7•
12 .
13.
14 .
CONCERNING 8 ACRE41JF UNDEVELOPED LAND OWNED THE CITY OF
•HUNTINGTON BEACH ED CF•-R, ON DALE VISTA IN A •TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS: WARNER, GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property. owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to, a developer. We are also opposed to
any use of this property other than .for the originally intended-
park- for the following reasons : •
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes.
3 . Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location . and for their additional privacy
We request along with all other petitioners, that .an environmental
impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient.
5IGNEITURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
3. 1 J L�. �1 �' f� l� . l I /L I r 1 l r� 1. ? /1."1:. (•' /�
4 .
6.
7 .
9 .
/
10.
An
12 . � - ��� `� I• `� f1. i�`.
%
CONCERNING 8 AC:RE�' )F UNDEVELOPED L!�ND OWNiED THE CITY OF
•HUNTINGTON BEACH, WIED CF-R, ON DALE VISTA , IN A TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS : WARNER , GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer . We are also opposed to
any use .of . this property other than for the originally intended
park -for the following reasons :
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes .
.3. Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional privacy ;
We request along with all other petitioners , that an environmental .
impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient .
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
2 . �6
3 .
L �v v1` 5- •
4 .
5 y/' l" n<r.-L Ii�J�,�-761fJJCG-G- y
o,.%
6 . / �� ' % �� !i "l�'"�` Lam', {11Cci'►:'l �: <<�? Y =� - N
i/
D/8 .
' r
9 . t (X C�� �. i�-� \.J' �)(' �lll' 'I L'
) 71
12 -M -
13 .
14 .
j_'Sc''iC%
1
io2- i= J7/
CONCERNING 8 ACIu .� UNDE'VELOPED .Li,ND OWNED MkT11E CITY OF
Y:UNTINGTON BEACH , ED CF-P, ON DALE VISTA LMW IN A TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS : WARNER, GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer . We are also opposed to '
any use of this property other than for the originally intended
park for the following reasons :
f
1. Additional homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would decrease the value of existing
homes .
3. Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional privacy
We request along with all other petitioners , that an environmental .
impact report be done prior to any non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient .
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
3 .
4 . Gi (� /�u/�/�
7 �� i / //�'L� �� L '_/ 1/�:i. 1i /�` /.i, r��_' j .l C� fuc c LZ /• r ,`
8 __.''/lLti*-L..;. `,c"..._✓ ;'.�r,i 2.c .�,:{�- �� �/,/iJ jlL1�:; i �'J��/ �.�/�/.•t,.' ;"Li,/.J �.'` .
9 .
1 I /
10 ..
12 . �LCiv `r��c,lr/�% ���:'/�Vg�� (<:.5" ' / lj G�'✓J [�/� /-�G'3
I-FT
CONCERNING 8 AC Ij� OF' UNDEVELOPED LAND OWNEI�Y THE CITY OF
HUN•TINGTON BEAC ONED CF-R, ON DALE VISTA E IN A TRACT
BORDERED BY THE FOLLOWING STREETS : WARNER, GOLDENWEST, HEIL
EDWARDS, CALLED IRBY PARK AND DEDICATED AS A PUBLIC PARK LAND.
The following property owners in this tract are opposed to the
sale of this property to a developer. We are also opposed to
any use of this property other than for the originally intended
park for the following. reasons : to
1.• Additional ,homes in this area would increase traffic and
noise .
2 . Development of this area would. decrease the value of existing
homes
3 . Properties adjacent to and across from this lot were purchased
because of their location and for their additional privacy
We request along with all other petitioners , that an environmental
impact report be done prior to any- non-recreational development.
A negative impact report is insufficient.
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME ADDRESS
2 .
ka
r- ��V: /�
r� T R�3�= �r �-l-1_ R- "
4 .
Fly
/.I� %j�L'L'��'�`r"`����L` ` ���l t "Z.X`�. L uLi `�,V C� ✓i�� lv/]/l'
9 .
10. `o C!
12 . KnrlP,-)n L ' iida- Otr H.
13.
14 . �� L k'k'��`'. /►Y"T>: ���/_>/�r:��Z �� ?S Z l/ t�J'J C�f'� `- i11i
Publish 12-10-81
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 81-1
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 81-47
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,
Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P X , or as soon thereafter-as
possible on Monday the 21st day of December 19 81,-
for the purpose of considering Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment No.. 81-1 ,
a proposal to change the General Plan designation on some 30 acres located south of
Huntington Central Park, east of Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue and 630 feet
west of. Goldenwest Street from Open Space Development to Recreation. Said hearing
will also consider proposed deletion of Wieder Park Site, located at the northwest
corner of. Saybrook and Santa Barbara Lanes, from the Open Space/Conservation Plan.
Negative Declaration 81-47 will also be considered in conjunction with said
Open Space/Conservation Plan.
Further information may be obtained from the Department of Development Services.
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their
opinions for or against said Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment No. 81-1 and
ND 81-47.
Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main
Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227
DATED 12-4-81 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City. Clerk
NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM 00M .V aru lQ�UGZGLOyj �C �';'�.{,'•�yt�1 ?'li �� (�?7 t�zt,
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: �1
FROM:
PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE
I'r DAY OF
CAP's^are attached
AP's will follow
No We
Initiated by:
Planning Commission
Planning Department
Petition
* Appeal
Other
Adoption of Environmental Status (x) X
YES NO
Refer to JL��`�'`f�- (�L�t a14 , Planning Department - Extension # 5-2-77
for additional information.
* If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal.
e- :�.. r...r-:^� ... ..-✓ i...r:'", _ .�-a< ✓;�r!A-fib•r .xr, ..._rn.�._^`"P^Ys.q�^'17�nf� ':»....
r
Sr=QUfr7-(0 c(1
itI DT/C F l� HE,PE /vCN
� .��&� �,./.e;,�a�_ buy GU.e..
a� � �y �_ � �•�O rt �-a chi � �'ct�l�o�ru a.
Q C f / �'�7L '�'�'1 :_c���%YrWn-� o GL��I/Yt.Oin�
� elk
o71Of
94
X-x d
a-v ot P-,w-,--35 O-A t,
Y) 53,6
C/Otl, o-�
l 481.
f DIHGLR — AVE ' L
tL
ll _ rrPRREfIVIlDLjj1OR CF-E _
CF-EI ,:..,::,/'.':1 RO�.L1�liC
..� C.%AUI OR
RHAPSODY ��•-� OR —
.> r CF R — ILLS -� _ _ - — UoU R
r
J = r wY
-- _. -- - - -
VERA
� 1� r.� ------ - - _I IT - -
r.
Ca q C C O
OR
�`'', --- --.� • ICI __ i
.r� CF-R -
1[0.
G L :pA -W, .�aa-
CF-R CF-E
y l�
CF-R -
S AR
CF R M.
ARa/AI J
CF-R i
CF R LEI
' _ A
`' •i.• �_-• � �. A L�tr«� .� PE ARC[ SY
OAL DR
CF'R lr► a ill DR
OR r..
R V
S.L — —
- 1RUMO'
CF-R - MIL --
jJ ' yt. _ i
DAVYf.I
rIt
.' .' • s - -- — - in
in
CFR. y r .� — OR
I-P�
w +- -
�— �^WARNER AVE r
WIEDER PARK SITE
T
•
178-6u-12
Phillip A GLogm
16281 Smitzook Line
funtiggton Bosch, Calif
92649
' 178--911-13
Od&w Patch n♦ct ' Robwt v Stout: TAne
'Htsttingyon Bloc ho Calif
- - - - - - _92649_ - - - - - - - - - - -
178411-0S 178-612-04
C V C hal4 ati. ' Garvin W 5lcdgga•
.16292 MuA&W Chicle i 16241 San Clemente Circle
ii�ietingt�on Boac6„ t2LlJ , tantin7bon Bosch, C MI J
92649 - - - - - _� _ 92649_ -- -- -- - - - - - -. -
178-611-06 ; 178-612-05
rrioam P am lumoo Willi A Peec hat
16282 Mandalay Cltccle ' 16261 San C1mbe Circle
t6,s tingba, OWCA, Calif 9 t9 goon eaach,
64 cif
929 - -- - - -- - - - - - -- ---- - -- - - - - - - - - .
i
178-b11-07 i 178-612-M
l6errteth N tssac Rick Annigoni,
16272 Midalay Circle i 18652 MwArttw Blvd
Mmtirybun Beach, Calif Suits 440
92649 ___--_ _ _ _ Isv_i=re, Calif 92715_ -
178-611-08 178-612--07
euon3stts L Hvlett James E Halliday
16251 Santa 8atcbatca Lane 3672 Circle
Ma<ttingtnn Bebab, Calif , kkintington Bosch, Cal if
.92649 92649
178-611-09 i 178-612-08
R*o rt H NdbftUen George A Penum
16255 Santa B r aara Lane 16252 San Clemente Circle
Huntington Basch, Calif Hunti qtm Bwch Calif
92649 .92649.
178-611-10 178-612-09
StephM C Hvttler i WiliiAcn A Richards
16261 Santa Hat tam Lame 16235 Santa Barbmr i Lane
Mx&b Futon Beach. Oslif Hmtirgtm Beach, Calif
92649 92649 - - - - - - - - - - - - . +
17,8-d11=11. . i 178-i12-LO "
Frrd L §kamUic James W..Clark .
16271 Ssybta* Lits 16241 Santa Barbara Lane
Hucttinyban eeac�>. Calif 8 Basch, Calif
92N9_ - -- - - -- - -- - -- --- -i--94� - -- - -- --- - -- - - -._._
i
i
i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . _
. 178-61?-11 i
Daniel Craig Open tion
16245 Santa Barbara Lams , Element ANWNImesit 81-1 QH)
liuntingtca Bed, calif
92649
17rC3-612-12 ' 178-621-18
Gerald O Hiland ; James O A=9W
16261 MuzIaley Circle 16181 Santa harbara Lane
Huntington Bead, Cal i li tiixJbon Beach, Calif
92640 _ t 92649 _ .
178-612.13 - _ -- - - - - - - j - 178-621-19
Bradley.H Boon _ + Jeffrw J sta held
1b271 .Mandalay Circle 16191 Santa bartara Lane
ituntiiry Beach, Calif , Huntitxjton Beach, Calif
92649 92649
i
j 17"12-14+- �- 178-621-20
rk=w a oz Luft Me C Man
16281 ,. Cis�cle , 16201 Santa Hadora Lane
Huntington Beach Cali ap*4 xltion Beach, Calif
92649 i 92649
178412-49 178-OU-16
ltarbcxsr Ooaptes Cc..; RXIS r ewers OD.
1072 Garfield Avis M 9301 Central Ave we
Huntington Beach. Calif Garden Grove, Calif
92648 1 92664
- - --- - - ----- ---- -- - - ' .
178-612-01
Kenneth R Norman
16211 Sates Barbara Lame
iwntinyton Beads, Calif
92649
17d-612-02
Arilaw J Yaott ozzi
1622.21 Santa Barbara Lww
liunti.ngtm Beach, Calif
92649
17.8-612-03 - _ - -
Gerald K Nista
16231 Santa Barbara Lane
ti><aitinytian go= ,, Cali f
92bO
17a-621-17
George M !i Chun
10171 Santa Barbara Lane
)huAAMtm Beach, Cal i
.92649
I
t
!�'� ■�/ // _� k� FA loll
IN III
IIi��� �i�i�ii/IN�Ii/I�Ie�� �� I�i1i �Ii11/�� �c►����C���=•6
�'1111� `��111/111111 //l/_ 1so III
1� 11/�I�
PM OR
.� 14 � .�� IIINlllillllliill
� ��1=1�= IIINNi11111Nli!
��/� •jam ��a�:o
/1/
f ��l►�� ►�rii i1oil iHuntii
��i
Ii11�• -
111a
. , Contra, .I{ICI
s y `
•li I IIII
IIIIIlIIIiI�
Ililllll III
iliilili�lll
T�:\
piny�nrr
�'llllllliiill tlIIIIItlIN 'lllllil HII`Ililllllll:
,11111111111 P 11111I ,,Iilllllilll,lilllllilll: I m
�Illiilllllll�iillilllllil •�{Illill{!II{Illill{Iii,
rlliillillil,li� ili IIIIIIII :IIIIIiIII�III}Iillllllll:
np,l�Iny�:r�yryiilnl =rpluy y��-�Irynliy-�
Illlllill,�
�IIIIIIIIIIII . . . .
'llllllllilll
ililliliiliil ��
ii{ilillil{
�b
f
fi •r)�h
110-152-01
2260 Asrk NGkVOrt 1r #103
92560 t BOOCN Ca 1 if
110-152-03
Ivaleen Alton
4000 Michigan Ad #*-99 f
03monddle, Miahigan 48821 1
- I
UO-152-U
J P lrederickmon
Doaoft F Jao*y &b
1946 Custer 1
Iaremie, Wyo. 82070 1'
- - - - - - -
110-152-05
R F Hermg 1-
16251 W a&tock Lane
Umun1ton leamch, Calif
92647
110-152-06 - - - -- - ,
Milton H Mm w jl
272 S FAKfiord I*ive
Beverly Hi1L, Calif
90212
- - - -- - - --- - -- - - - -- - - j f
110-152-07 f
Central Perk Ee mu&tan Beam Harlin }
next 1126 Pac Mutual Bg
Igoe Angeles, Calif 90014
i
110-151-11 110-152-08
R jrlkiz d W Meyer
5112 bciarliu Drive ; 13191 Newland Street j
Yorba U ndi, Calif Gmden Qvm' Calif
92686 92644
110-151-15 110-152•-09 - - - - - - - -
IhffkL 4ton Pacific COUP W R Bailey
2110 Main Street 1 ���fl'am
ltunt.inyton Beach, Calif River
92648
LA
110y-151-17 ; 110-152-1.1
Pacific American Oil CO ODXP Flizabeth.'W Chap ran
7385 Santa Monica Blvd 510 Palm Drive f
Hollywood, Calif O_ ard,, Calif
90046 ,
r '
I I
,
I !
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
110-152-14 110-153-16
Open tiion Milton H Marm
!Elsnent Amembent W. 81-1 272 S Rexford Drive
8i IOuotber 13, 1981 (JH) , Beverly Hills, Calif
90212
llu-152-17 ! 110-153-04 ' 110-153-21
r.Melyn V Auger at al 140d P Derigo Bbanan A Parker
P.O. Box 7 ! 5292 Allst+one Derive
807 Main Street
bw-lr-oft, ID ! lntttington Beach, Calif i Hm4t�tion Beach, Calif
92648
116-152-19 ! 110-153-05 1110-163-13
Jatm Gustafson ; Charles P McKenzie et al WhIter D Service
5161 Peeroe Street I P.O. Bost 477 , 7050 Running g Iron Low
Huntington Beach, Celia I Sin City,
Calif I Pooatelly, ID
91649 02381 83201
110-152-20 110-153-06 ; 110-163-15
W R Bailey I Phil Grandjean Est. I Philip J Marino
4060 Chapmn Place ! George V Gransjean 11 SiMmons at
Riverside, Calif ; P.O. Box 1060 I Laurens, SC
i
y25eb1 Carlsbad, M 8.8220
129360
110-152-22 110-153-10 - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - � 110-163-16 --- -- - - - - -- - - - • •�
;Rahn W Shenk 3rd et al I Arthur E. Waybourn
b43 5 Olive Street 507 Amber Drive 221110 E 4800 South
al
ipe Ampler, �' I mintinyton Beach, Calif Salt Lake City, Utah
.10014 92648 84117
110-152-23 i 110-153-12. ! 110-163-17 i
Waldo E Bemis . I !
Muriel w EnBic,� , Joe !! Anderson , Robert ti A1].en
1111 Main Street ! Denis L Allen ;
416 W Las PaLase Drive Huntinybon Beec2t. Calif 4147 Gardenia Avenue !
Fullerton , Calif 92632 r 92648 Long Beach, Calif 90807
110-153-01 ! u4-153-13 ; 110-163-22
o ville W Carter ; ELoer E BLmm ! Charles G Ttamitall
P.O. b= 1080 I 524 S 9th East P.O. Boot 646
Hawthorne*' Calif Salt.I.ake City, Utah Wildomar, Calif
9U150 184105 92395
110-153-03
110-153-14 - - - - - - - - - - - - -11- - 6- 3
�emwity Pacific bank ! 1
George Cantor 1 P ti .
NAtiLmal TR ' 323 Via Lido Soud 1 10 8:0 e
Tax Division i01-5-13970-0 Newport Reach, Calif f
P.O. ilox 60802 92663 9 646 1
'ipnninal Annexi - - - - - - ;• - - •• - - -' - - - - - - - - - -
•- -- - - - - •- -
il�B Anyelee, Calif � 110-153-15 , 11 16 0
Cbrder W Wattenbarger a j
90026 , 6202 Cornell Dlriie . 70 E
i Huntington Beach, Calif
92647 844 1�
I ,
1
� I
1 I
T_
I
I
_ + - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
110-164-03 .;()pail 4kcWOunselsvation ; 110-165-08
it:)n3ld P BDzyhetti I E1aG nt 3t 81-1 010 ' Union Bank Truat a'
1U20d Di ay Circle Oct. 14, 1981 TR P #1752 TR #P7022
tymtialbon Beach, Call , , P.O. BOx 2193 Tenn Anrxat
92646 ' Loa Angeles, Calif 90054
110-164-04 , 110-164-15 110-165-12
tiara M Mmexay I lliataa B wooao rd Jr Anne Ferguson
217U tl=iaon Blvd. 1823 Hammon Muth E Martin
uAm, Utah I Ogovil le, .Cali! 16921 Doiminician Drive
b4401 ' 95965 San Diap" Calif 92M
110-164-05 I 110-164-16 ; 110-165-14 - - - - - - - -
Annie JAM Neiwland , Kathryn C Tilton I Pobert MwJwnsen
Araiia J Berry I 401 PY04]ect Circle 1993 Cbltuia Hi9tsa
5638 Tortuga ss
C? ' 60. Pasad , Calif Yuba City, Calif
91036
I
�>< uie�,_Calif -92124 ti 95991
- - , -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
110-164-06 ' 110-164-111 - - - -- -- ► 110-165-16 -
Crarles 8 Kimball ; William C Scouller Gearye Cantnar
t404 I.eyuna Vista Drive I Miriam Lawson Ted Oliver
NDvato# Calif i 613 HUntington Avenue P.O. Boot 2491
94947 I H nti»;Lt+on Beach, Calif 92648 Laguna Hilts, Calif 92653
110-164-07 ; .110-164-19 110-165-17 - - - - - - - - - -
ikux" C Morton . I idm C %Linde I Duane V Woolpert et al
1126 Pat Mutual Wag. I 5202 Cornell Avwwe ' 2399 8 Pacific ODaet Hwy
IAm AngelAe, Calif i Westminster, Calif Iniy Beach,delif
90014 ' 92683 90804
I
_ . - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - ------- - - -
110-161-08 i - - - -
110464-20 UO-165-20
ivulyn R Tiffin I Rcaald P .borghetti ' iw Oliver
u.du Fashion Avemue i 10208 Disnoy, Circle i P.O. Soot 2491
tDnq Basch, Calif ' Huntiix3t�on beech, Calif ' Laguna Hills, Calif
9Ud10 i 92646 ; 92653 '
110-164-10 i 11G=164-2I "~ 110-165-23
L.ya" Messner Levis P Deriw I Lin�oe C' C,aS�del�n' •^�.•:`•
,: w s risshelm _ ' 807 Main Street 18875 Beagle Lane
1830 Graham Blvd. ; Ikmtinytaa Beech, Calif I Riverside, Calif
Pith abok 35, PA 15235 I 92648 92504
110-164-11 ; 116-165-01. - - - - - - - - - -110-165-24 _
Ao am B 11 I Helen H Gibson Peter H Laimbeer
9.39 36th Street 1917 N RxUW Dr Apt 319 11240 Talbert Avenue .
LOS Calif
� 8404�ert, Utah - - _ _ ; 90027 , Calif 92706
�n Valley,
- - - - - -
110-164-12 i 110-165-09 110-181-01 - -
j Harold C Morton lcemelh H Miller Gregory S Davidson
1146 Pac Mutual Bldg. 2901 Tam O Shanter Drive 34021 Aurelio Drive
Los Angeles, Calif + El Dorado Hills, Calif Dena Point, Calif
1 90014 i 95630 92629
- - - - - . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . .
I I
I
I
•� i
• i i
I
- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - -- - _- _ _ _ - - -
111J~•181-02 - - - -�- - ----- - -- - - - - I
110-183-07
Janes if Whitson Jr ; Open 4we/Oonservation Avery C Eaton
15638 Starbuck Street Element Amendrant 81-1 17514 Santa Paula Circle
wtuttier, Calif (JiKl I Fu ntain Valley, Calif 92608
90603 ,
110-181-04 110-182-03 1 110-183-15
1 Avery C Eaton Richard T Leaver
Olarles P MC enzie at al 17524 Santa Paula Circle I 9393 Sierra Mar Dmrive
0.0. Box 4.77 ; Pbuntain Valley, Calif Las Angeles, Calif
Sun City, Calif 92381 ' 92708 , 90069
110-181-05 1 110-182-05 i 110-183-19
Malvin F Kellar Regina ,C Kahle ; James R Maag
4534 SW Hewett Blvd. flegina C Cross I 2260 Park Newpott Dr i103
PartiXXI 1, Oreg(a 1360 Adam Ave Apt 28P ; Newport Be arh, Calif
972U Omta Mesa, Calif 9026 i 92660
110-181-07 110-102-07 i UO-183-23
kl C kiurtron i Janes D Plunkett I Evangeline H W Gentry
78U- E 5th South 11232 Hunting turn Drive 3637 Snell Avenue #333
bountiful Utah , Santa ana, Calif I San Jose, Calif
84010 92705 1 951"
-..- - --- -- - - -- ---� - -- - -- --- ------------- 1-- - - ------- - - - -- - - -
1104bhW. 110-182-08. I 110-184-01
J uunetta C Mills Clarenoe J Hakk ns i Bradley K Davidson
Elizabeth C Lowell , Briaht F Boa kins i t4281 Hillvisw Drive
511 E; Sahara Meraro Apt P201 374 Storrs Avenue I Laguna Niguel, Calif
Lays Vim, Nevada 89104 ; American Plank, Utah 84003 ; 92677
110-181-09 110-ld2-10 110-18"5
C J Hate Jean W Howell I Joseph M Shea
3501 Don Carlos Derive 1 1438 Circle Shy + 905 N Dickel Street
Car I abad. Calif Salt Lake City, Utah Anaheim, Calif
92008 84103 92805
110-181-10 i 110-182-11 j 110-184-07
Myra G Headrick ' Wa1rdD E Bem18 I Christine Bridges Parker
6108 Cliff Drive ; Muriel W Ensign 10922 NW 11th Avemie
Paradise, Calif 416 W Las Palmas Drive . I Gainsville, Florida
95969 Fullerton, Calif 92632 1 32601
11.U-1dl-11 110-182-12 I 110-184-09
.2ian. L Lutheran Church Daily V W Gloves ' Daily V W Glover
U A C 421 N Janes Street. ; 421 N Janes Street
Arjunia, Kansas Anaheim, Calif ' Anaheim, Calif
670U4 + 92805 i 92805
110-181-12 110-183-03 110-184-10
Ralph Noaanan ' Myron M Wasson ; Charles b Kimball
Thexfoure Nozman 23636 &ydney Bay Street I 2404 lac,;urba Vista Drive
4!)1 westun;unt Drive Lujuna Niguel. Calif ; NavFit O, Calif
Lu6 An4eles, Calif 90048 ; 92677 1 94947
I 1
I i
I I
1 1
, I
I 1
, I I
' � J
I
1 -IB4=12 - - - - ------- .:' ... . _.�.. ,,.._... - - - - - - -- --;
1C1
Nunuam A Parker OPT► Srxxm/ainservatim John Gustafson
5292 Allsbone Drive Element Ammulnent 81-1 (JH) 5161 Pearce Drive
Huliti g ton beach, Cali Huntington Beach, Calif
92649 .. _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 92649 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
110--1d4-13 ► UO-185-06 110-186-02
Richard V Wine Ray Cartwright , James G. Burchm
2200 Park Newport #401 I 33816 Alcazar Drive I 9331 Nantucket Drive
Newport BeWh,Calif ' Dana Paint, Calif 1 fiwntinybon Beach, Calif '
92660 92629 , 92646
11Q-184-16 110-185-09 110-186-03
William 6 aLmd and Mrs. Prank Aratstxeng et al I RNkIld L Knudtaon
sedons, Ari mane Dorothy C Vzwpe ' 408 12t1i Street
d6336 P.O. Boot 1825 Huntington Beach,Calif
rancho Santa Fe, Calif 92067 1 92648
- - - - - - - - - - - - • - - -- --- - - :- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
110484-17 110-185-10. i UO-186-07
Charles F Barnett . Sarah O I&rtineua i Patricia G Pyyyak
►betty McQuillen 209 Balti=re Avenue , 9757 Tt ucan Circle
2630 Westwood Blvd. Huntington Beach, Calif + Fountain Valley, Calif
Los An eles,-Calif 90064 92648 ' 92708
-- - - -- - - - - - -- - ---- -- -- ---- - - - - ----- - - - - -- - - - ----- - --- - - - - -
110-.184-18 110-185-11 1 110-186-08
myn i M Wasson I Ernest L Dalany C T Reynolds.
.e3636 Sidney 'Bay Street % Michael Dalany I Katharine J Reynolds
Laguna Niguel, Calif ; 631 S. Orangegrove Avenue I 2235 Millersport Hwy
92677 I Sierra Madre, Calif 91024 ; Getzville, N. Y. 14068
- --- --- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - r - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -
110-184-20 i 110-185-13 i 110-186-09
Mae Shaiglara A J Head I J A Johnson
564 N Poplar Street I Mrs. Viva H Paar 3079 Maiden Lane
Manteca, Calif - 1 191 HmmW Avenue Altadena, Calif
95336 Rochelle Park, N.J. 07662 1 91001
110-184-21 UO-185-17 i 110-186-10
Clare W. tfardy• I H.J. White I Lester K Layton
Gi luart W Wilkens I 6491. Jonse Avenue ; 12ii San Julien Place
4d9 b StrOeeet Riylerside, cis'if 1 Lake San Marcos, Calif
salt wk1e City Utah 84103 92505 ' 92069
lli}-1b5-01 110-185-18 110-186-11
Philip A Wntin Hattie Mae Mitchell ; George W bai,nter
2511 L: Marshall Avenue P.O. Box 4 + Carl Oakford
rlxjpnix, Arizona Meadview, Arizona 6901 Ellis Avenue
8501.6 86444 1 Huntirigbon Beactl,Calif 92648
110-165-03 ; 110-185-20 ; 110-186-12
ti.J: White Stephen F Gallagher Y'vette C Iawrem' ,e
649.1. Junes Avenue 1695 W Crescent Avenue i Carl OW Wrd
Riverside, Calif 1 Suite 222 1 6901 Ellis Avenue
92505 Anaheim, Calif 92801 - - - - _ - Huntington beach,Calif 92648
I I
� 1
+ r
1
� t
I 1
I
I �
JAO-186-13 Open t.ion ! 110-162-15
Marvin P Adler F.Leaent Amendment 81-1 (JH Maynard H Lo1�el1
8906 Whrneor Avenue. ! 36 C resthaven
Fountain Valley, Calif + Irvine, Calif
92708 ! 92714
110-186-14 + 110-166-16 UO--162-18
eiermnn Haroae ; Annie BeadW. Maxis Palajac
Lorraine Harms ! Velma C beachy ; 6922 Vista Del Sol Derive
5655 116th Place SE ; 1132 S Iboavood Avenue Rmtingtnonn Beach, Calif
ftllevue; Washington 08004 + Inglewood, Calif 90301 92647
110-186-15 110-163-11 + 110-162-20
Julian I Hathmay + William E Nioolat Jo%Vh M Hanyak
P.U. Bdx 3404 ' -2925 E 7th Street 1781 Moorpark Drive
Santa Fe Slarimis, Calif i IAWg Basch, Calif area, Calif
90670 ' 9US04 + 92621
UO-186-16 + 110-162-03 i UO-162-22 - - -
AULM E Qnyhes ' Frank R Kellar Eileen M Warton
J I Hatha ny ; 16801 Blanton Street ; Eileen M King
F.O. Box 3404 HUntirw4ton Beach, Calif 2247 9wartkvwke Drive
Santa Fe Springs, Calif 90670 i 92649 Sacramento, Calif 95825
_ .- - - - - - - !- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ._ .
110-1d6-ld ; UO-162-06 + UU-179-10
` Ni1da 11 Clayson ! Wn d Petty ; Donald •Ramilbon
P.O. Box 1l4 + CharUw E Petty P.O. 'Boot 698
pasa "-A, Calif 859 W Foothill Blvd. Wilmington, Calif
911U1 ! Wnrovia, Calif 91016 ! 90748
110-lb6-20 ; '110-162-10 110-180-02
F4xW jjh C Mani ng ! Barbara S Haxtron ! 'A C Marian.
1650 3rd Street .Bck 202 . P.O. Box 108
Natw Calif ! Taos, New MwLiao HUntington Beach, Calif
91760 i 87571 92648
110-186-21 ! 110-162-12 ! 110-190-01
Orville W Garter r Gary L Pitts Julian I Hathaway
P.O.• KU 1080 ! 2608 HUntimjtxxi Avenue . P.O. Box 3404
Hwdthorne, Calif ! Huntington Beach, Calif ; Santa Fe Springs, Calif
40250 ; 92648 90670
110-163-03 110-162-13 ; 110-190-02
j4ui G Daulley ! Z B West Jr + Muriel F Johnson
1312 Golden Rain Rd i67A Mrs. Fred Pinkstion 2367-3E Via Aariposa West
Sml Beach, Calif ' 281 N Main Street ! Iagum Hills, Calif
00746 Orange, Calif 92666 ! 92653
110-163-04 110-162-14 ' 110-190-05
Lhaynatrl H. LObe ll JOhn Cbttan► ; Constance Ann.Haiiricks
36 Cresthav+gn s 2161 25th Street Apt. 23 ! 299 He=x)sa Way
Irvine, Calif San Pedro, Safi iA"a OUSPo, CA if
92714 90732 93401
i
UO--191-01 , 110-192-09
c/o WiGodding Open M=hael Lee Taylor
lliam T G Beckett , Element Amendment 811-1�(J11) + 615 12th Street
35dO Ridgecrest Drive Hunt.inyton Beach,Calif
92648
Carlsbad, Calif 92008 '
i �
110-191-02 110-191-16 UO-192-11
Fred W flooding Haber T Hanks George M Carmichael et al
L)imund iand & Livestock OD Jane K Knecht 1571 Ramillo Avenue
D S' Smith 825 Wiled�rda Drive I"4 Beach, Calif
Shoshone,, Idaho 83352 1 La Cain. Calif.91011 90d15
110-191-=03 ; 110-191-17 u0-210-01
Aic*i" T Leaver S vh4a b Duncan , Wi111arn Landis
9.393 Sierra Mar Drive c/o Randi Fjaeran 1180 S Lwverly urivie
ws Aboles, Calif ; P.O. " 1998 ; Los Angeles, Calif
9LVJ69 Chula Vista, Calif 92012 90035
110-191-04 �Y 110-191-18 i 110-210-02
A W I-rJdmon Richard T Le w er Adele A Hankey
Fay M Larson 9393 Sierra Mar Five 28232 urtega ifiy'hay
ally Lab Pasadao Drive i Los Angeles, Calif San Juan Capistrano, Calif
4iittier, Calif 90605 90069 92625
- - - - - - y - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - F - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
110-191-08 UO-161-20 110-151-04
Harriett T Shea Mildred K. Arimtrong
iR>�t i Pandi Fjaeran 56 S 100 West Street
P.O. !foot 1998 8buntiful, .Utah
Chula Vista, Calif 92012 r 84010
110-191-08 ; u0-192-01 lfi 51-05
c;ta;rlotte, Gratz Dori Marton
1 if
634 S Unhad 'Drive 210d Alta Vista Drive IN 1 /
Burbank, Calif i Vista, Calif + 1 1"
91506
92083 i ton,beach, Calif 92647
110-191-09 , i 110-192-06 i 110- 51-07
Harriett. T Shea ! Hi�ch3xd V Care
iLUA.0 F'jaeran ; Christopher V Q uine 68 1 B on ntl f/
P.O. BOX 1998 2200 Park Newport #401 � it n rhr
,
(;Hula Vista, Calif 92012 ; Newport t3aa�-i,calif 92660 92 4 7 1
1.10-191-13 110-i92-07
H A Lam lat. 1RW J
� .L�h P�cif c Aner an i l o u,:
John cMarie M Carter 8 5an a Bivd.
4336 a6an, Ave Narth P.O. hoo 713 Hollywood, C 046 �I
Habir"le; MN ' 55422 , Lava lot_Sprinc;s, Idaho 83246
11u-191-14 UO-192-08
ijaWlti C Morton i Laura A Guthrie
523 W 6th Street aoom1126 Ernest R Mayhen
we Angeles, Calif ; 4041 Tivoli Avieraie
90014 i Los Angeles, Calif 90066
i
i