Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSkate Park Project - VF Outdoor, Inc. - 7461 Center Avenue - - CITY OF NUNTINGTON PROOFOF BEACH LEGAL NOTICE PUBLICATION 'ORDINANCE NO.3949;, Adopted 4 the City Council . on JUNE 4,2012 "AN ORDINANCE,OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) BEACH AND SPECIFIC i� CORRIDORS SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT 2.1.41 sse TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD SEG- MENT COUNTY OF ORANGE ) THEID REMOVING THE RESIDENTIAL DES- I IGNATION FROM PROP- ERTY,LISTED AS (APN #142-073-03)" SYNOPSIS: , am a citizen of the United States and a Ordinance No. 3949 ap- resident of the County of Los Angeles; I proves Zoning Map Amendment No: 11-002 which represents a re- am over the age of eighteen years, and quest by'the applicant to amend the Beach not a party to or interested in the notice and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove published. I am a principal clerk of the the "Residential Re- quired" designation HUNTINGTON BEACH from the vacant project site located on„Center :.,INDEPENDENT,, which was adjudged a Avenue, approximately . 500 ft. east of Gothard newspaper of general circulation on street. The reason for'the re September 29, 1961, case A6214, and quest is to permit the development of a-public June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the skate park.The.General Plan .Housing Element City of Huntington Beach County of specifies that the 2.7- acre site will be'des- Orange, and the State of California. ignated exclusively for residential uses and in- Attached to this Affidavit is a true and dicates that the City. intends for the site to complete copy as ' was printed and be developed with a minimum of 175 afford- published on the following date(s): able units. In,addition, the site is designated in the Beach and Edinger Corridors.Specific Plan Thursday, June 14, 2012 (To.wn Center ' - Neighborhood)as"Resi-. dential Required". In or der to permit the devel- opment of the proposed skat.e park, 'an- certify (or declare) under penalty amendment the Gen- eral ,Plan Housing le- ment and aiZoning Text of perjury that the foregoing is true I Amendment tb Beach and Edinger the and correct. ridors Specific Plan is required to remove the housing designation on the project site. PASSED AND ADOPTED by 'the'City Council•of the City of Huntington Executed on June 22 2012 Beach at regular , meeting held -June 4, ; 2012 by the following at Los Angeles, California roll call vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES:None . ABSTAIN:None ABSENT:Shaw THE FULL TEXT OF THE I t ORDINANCE 'IS AVAIL- ABLE IN THE 'CITY i CLERKS OFFICE. Signature This;ordinance is ef=I fective 30 days after adoption. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. 2000 MAIN STREET . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 714-536-5227 'JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY. 'CLERK Published H.B. Indepen dent6/14/12, City Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ® Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ® www.huntingtonbeachea.gov -77 9909 Office of the City Clerk t Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF ACTION General Plan Amendment No. 11-002/Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 (Skate Park Project) May 14, 2012 VF Outdoor, Inc. 6500 Katella Avenue Cypress CA 90630 SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 11-002/Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 (Skate Park Project) APPLICANT: VF Outdoor, Inc., 6500 Katella Avenue, Cypress CA 90630 PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: GPA: To amend the City's General Plan Housing Element to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) and the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6) to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. ZTA: To amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property. LOCATION: 7461 Center Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street) PROJECT PLANNER: Tess Nguyen On Monday, May 7, 2012, the City of Huntington Beach City Council held a public hearing to consider your request and took the following action: approved General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 by adopting Resolution No. 2012-24, approved Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for approval and adopted Ordinance No. 3949, and approved the CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations— EIR No. 10-009. Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan 4 Waitakere, New Zealand Notice of Action G PA 11-002/ZTA 11-002 May 14, 2012 Attached are Findings for Approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002, a copy of Resolution No. 2012-24, a copy of Ordinance No. 3949, and a copy of page 6 of the May 7, 2012 City Council Action Agenda. If there are any further questions, please contact Tess Nguyen, Associate iflanner at (714) 374-1744. Joan L. Flynn, CIVIC City Clerk J F:rl c: Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Tess Nguyen, Associate Planner Attachments: Copy of Resolution No. 2012-24 Copy of Ordinance No. 3949 Findings for Approval for ZTA No. 11-002 Page 6, City Council Action Agenda dated May 7, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-.._2,+ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 proposes to amend the Housing Element 1)to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) and 2)to update the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6)to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given,held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-002; and The City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. The Amendment demonstrates that the City has adequate sites that can accommodate housing to address the City's share of regional housing needs. NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the General Plan is amended pursuant to Amendment No. 11-002, which amends the Housing Element 1)to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City- 12-3201/75855 1 Resolution No. 2012-24 owned property on McFadden Avenue(Table IV-7)and 2)to update the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6)to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7 t h day of Nay ,2012. Mayor REVIE APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO�FORM: _ City a r City Attomby Y)V .2-I,I-jam v �J 3•�`'1 •�2 INITIXTED AND APPROVED: irec or o Planning and Building Exhibit "A" - General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 12-3201/75855 2 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11 - 0 Table IV-6 Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan — Example Mixed Use Projects& Opportunity Sites -Projects Number of New Site Project Density Units Acreage Edinger Avenue The Ripcurl 440 apartment units 3.8 acres 115 units/acre The Village at Bella Terra* 500 units 15.8 acres 32 units/acre Watt Development Property 600 units 13.8 acres 44 units/acre former Levitz property 1,260 units 12.5 acres 101 units/acre Beach Boulevard Beach&Warner 270 units 9.4 acres 29 units/acre Beach &Ellis(sec) 120 units 2.6 acres 46 units/acre Opportunity Sites Beach&Ellis (nwc) 450126 units 2-41.62 6277 units/acre acres Beach &Yorktown (nec) 200 units 3.5 acres 57 units/acre Total 3;540 3,516 units *Located on Edinger in The Crossings Specific Plan adjacent to Beach/Edinger Specific Plan area. Rezoning for Exclusively Residential Use As a means of complying with AB 2348 which requires at least half of sites rezoned to address a lower income RHNA shortfall to be designated exclusively for residential uses, the City has identified sites het#within and ad}asea -te the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan appropriate for development as entirely residential. The (wity will rezone thFee nr mere f the sites are identified in Table IV-7 (illustrated in Figure 9). +f 9 Blvd) and a RonevelGpment g en6Y owned site 6n MGFa d@r A1eRF2adjaGent to GGIdenwest Gallene The city i GLIrrently ab a to GGRIrrlit to rearming Cites 4 and 5- As part of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan adoption in March 2010, Site 4 was rezoned as entirely residential. Determination of which of the other sites affleRg 1 3 will be redesignated for exclusively residential will need to be confirmed as part of the BeaGh,'Edinner CneGAG Plan manes an additional zone change. Rezoning of thFee one or more of the additional sites in Table IV-7 will more than address the City's lower income RHNA shortfall for 352 units on exclusively residential sites (50% of total 704 lower income RHNA shortfall). 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-16 HOUSING RESOURCES ' Exbibd"A" - RcoobtionNu 2012-24 ' Table IV-7 Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use S. of Yorktown behind Beach Blvd, N. of Yorktown SpeG4 Plan Delaware St, S. of Main St (RDA 9wRed Main St Edinger Ave Total Slater Ave =583 There are three adjacent vacant parcels held under the same ownership. The, total yield could be 81 units. However, the three other parcels do not individually meet the criteria under AS 2348 and therefore are not included above. The City used the following process to develop the inventory of sites for rezoning to exclusively residential use. As port of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, o "micro- vulnerability" ono|yaia was conducted along Beach Boulevard to identify those adea most vulnerable to change from existing use (refer to Appendix A). City staff then evaluated these sites to determine which would be most appropriate for redeaiQnoUon to on exclusively residential use, and identified ai&aa 1-37 on Table |V-7. As depicted in the Rezoning 8dea Table and accompanying oedo| photos in Appendix A, these sites are characterized by o mix of o|der, economically marginal uses; parking lots; and vacant poroa|a - o|| factors contributing to their identification as vulnerable to change. The C|ty'a consultant for the Specific Plan eabrnobad the dwelling unit pohando| on each of these sites based on on expected residential product type, providing the basis for the units identified in Table |V-7. The Beooh/Ed|nQer8peo|fio Plan is structured as oforFn based Development Code, and does not establish maximum residential densities. The densities presented for sites 1-37 are not prescribed and do not represent nnoX(nnunl densities, but rather reflect the anticipated density based on an assumed product type. Site #4 in Table IV-7 falls just eu was rezoned as part o the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan within the PaG4iGa GGmmunity PlaR. The four parcels that comprise this former hospital site consist of surface parking }ots, and m nnadico| office building slated for demolition. A portion of this site had o previous proposal for development with 130 senior condominiums, and aevanyl developers have expressed on interest tothe City in developing the site with housing at densities ranging from 70-80 units/acre. The 2000-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT lV-17 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-24 density Gap. The City is GGFnmitted to amending the S138GifiG Plan te allow housing by development at 69 uniWaGFe. Although Site #4 consists of 4 separate parcels, all of the parcels are held under one ownership and would be required to be consolidated prior to development of the site. Additionally, all but one of the parcels would be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units if sold and developed separately. It should be noted that the parcel that would not be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units is tied to an adjacent parcel and would not be developed on its own as it is substandard in size and does not have street access. Site #5 is a 2.7 aeFe YaGaRt site eR MGFadden Avenue adjaGeRt to-Golden West GO affordable housing. The AgeRGY inteRdS tG issue a Request foF QualifiGafiGRG in FRid- 2009-tG ROR PF6fit-181A5iRg deyelepeFss for development of the site, and nnMnlete Regetiati()RS With the seleGted develeper by yeaF end; environmental Feview GR the site s. 175 affeFdable units on the site. This prGpeFty 16 GLIFrently designated for ixed 1J6e in the GeReFai Plan and ZGRed General industFiai; the City will aMeRd the GeheFal Plan and 7nninn for this site to allow only residential use- Site #5 is a 0 78-acre site located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, north of Main Street In 2010 the parcel was rezoned and included in the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan which allows for mixed use development The L-shaped vacant site is a single parcel with a narrow 60 ft frontage along Beach Boulevard and widening along the west (rear) property line The City estimates approximately 24 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment development standards and guidelines. Site #6 is a 1 32-acre site located on the east side of Gothard Street, south of Edinger Avenue In 2010 the parcel was rezoned and included in the Town Center Boulevard Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan which allows for mixed use development The privately owned parcel currently has an approximately 24,000 sg ft building which is occupied by an industrial tenant on a month to month lease and a surface parking lot with 37 parking spaces. Although the site is developed there has been strong interest in redevelopment of the site for residential The property is currently for sale and the property owner received various offers from residential developers to build a multi-family housing project. The City has met with several prospective developers to discuss low-income housing funding availability. The City estimates approximately 110 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Town Center Boulevard Se ment development standards and guidelines. Site #7 is a 1 04-acre vacant site located on the east side of Beach Boulevard, north of Slater Avenue. In 2010, the site was rezoned and included in the Neighborhood Boulevard Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, which 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-18 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-24 allows for mixed use development The City estimates approximately 52 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Neighborhood Boulevard Segment development standards and guidelines. Adequacy of Rezoning Program to Address RHNA Shortfall As indicated in Table IV-5, Huntington Beach has a shortfall of currently zoned sites to accommodate a portion of its regional housing needs for 704 lower income and 311 moderate income units. The City is committing to a rezoning program as part of the Housing Element (Program #9A) to provide adequate sites at appropriate densities to address this shortfall, and to address the following parameters of AB 2348: a) rezoned sites for lower income households provide for residential uses "by right"; b) rezoned sites accommodate a minimum of 16 units; c) at least 50% of sites rezoned to address the lower income housing shortfall are accommodated on sites designated for exclusively residential use. By way of example of high density residential sites to become available as part of the overall 5,000 unit capacity within the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, Table IV-6 illustrates eight specific opportunity sites and proposed mixed use projects. These eight sites alone provide capacity for over 3,500 units, seven of which provide densities appropriate to support lower income development, and one site with densities suitable to support moderate income development. Through the rezoning to occur as part of the adoption of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, the City has provided suitable sites to address the City's RHNA shortfall for 311 moderate income units, and 352 lower income units permitted to be part of a mixed use development. Table IV-7 demonstrates the City's site capacity to address its shortfall of 352 lower income units on sites designated for exclusively residential use-, and one of the sites Site #4, was rezoned in 2010. It is estimated that this site could yield 187 units. Thus, the remaining shortfall would be 165 units which could be accommodated with rezoning of one or more of the other sites in Table IV-7. 5. Availability of Infrastructure and Public Services As a completely urbanized community, the City of Huntington Beach has already in place all of the necessary infrastructure to support future development. All land designated for residential use is served by sewer and water lines, streets, storm drains, and telephone, electrical, and gas lines. However, as an older community, much of the City's infrastructure is aging and will require improvements or replacement over time. The timing and funding of improvements need to be closely correlated with development phasing. The City has adopted an Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan that identifies needed improvement(s) and associated costs. 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-19 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-24 A1P-F-1ENIX A RESIDENTIAL SITES INVENTORY Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use (Amended Pages) Beach/Edinger Corridor Example Opportunities Sites (Amended Pages) Exhibit"A" -Resolution No.2012-24 Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use City of Huntington Beach Key APN Location Current Existing Uses/ Anticipated Area sq.ft. Density Map# Zoning Site Conditions #of units (acres) 1 025-191- Beach Blvd, S. of GGSP14 State-owned 70 92,411 33 du/ac 03 Yorktown property; Caltrans (2.12) (I3eaGh/Edin9e. maintenance yard; Plan trailer buildings 2 165-364- Cypress and GGSP14 3 vacant parcels 40 32,921 30 du/ac 04,-06,- Elm, behind (0.76) 24 Beach Blvd (Oe.-GOF Edinger 3 025-180- Beach Blvd, N. GGSP14 8 parcels, existing 100 136,785 31 du/ac 06,-13,- of Yorktown uses ranging from (3.14) 14,-15,- (8eaGhiEdin9er poor to good: 21,-23,- SpendaR) Partially vacant— 24,-25 cars being stored on property; 1950's house converted to medical office; produce stand; Big O Tires; mattress store; vacant commercial building; 1960's buildings;. 4* 159-121- BeaGh Blvd SP214 Existing medical 187 136,348 60 du/ac 25,-26,- Delaware St, S. building—building (3.13) 37,-38 of Main fPasif+Ga permit issued for (partial) ene^ R) demolition; surface parking lot 5 '^�73 MGFadden IG VaGaGt; 47-5 149,407 65 dulaG l3 6vem ie adjacent Redeveln n4 C-724 GGIv Iden Wes AgenGy$wned: GGlIege AgenGy to issue RFQ (BearF, Edinger f4GF ROR nr____Gn t L, Spedr. aF4 event with 5 159-031- Beach Blvd, N. SP14 Vacant C�t�� 24 34,284 30 18 of Main 19.78 du/ac 6 142-511- Gothard St, S. SP14 Existing industrial 110 57,639 32 05 of Edinger building;surface {1.32) du/ac parkin-g lot 7 167-325- Beach Blvd, N. SP14 Vacant 52 45,162 50 -21 of Slater 1.04 du/ac 57-2583 *Rezoned in 2010. 1�..-.,.,, ate ��� -_AN �� �„7a�,,,,7N +:'�''�,Y'E"•.3,F..�'z" �' ��� � t � 'F'i: PN s x x € WIN RIN Ell Ac Au S^'�:.r r; 3•- � �_� R -"� ems-� ��r -..��s� �� µ � � w.. q .•t( y Y e � x �" � y,�°c"Y -t'" 3"�C �+c:`�5�� dam.'. 'e C' `��-�;•..�dr�'�' �` 1 -'��' �.�3•:t t� i. s s Yy'� {ry F. tom+ ,sue � .�•.. � �""z'c � 'w..fi�..-.�i._'�"` ���.-L"'�. i"'.' -��—+-�`� ���ram, �',.� xt'"' }-� .ii { �,, kR its !y i 7 v �M1 a J�1! At 4 kUIMW 4. ,E ^l 'a$t+.— i�,.t �vrr �, .s u� f�Q� n 1ll '� 7a J4Es 1� I rrf4 rk } a.I� rl,rr'�Pf vi t r1 c. v� C Yv � 4 '+ &.�r � ��j�'Vi+'�k"'V�'�'r`Fkr�'r�7{'t}� x�,4,+-mrrMyekmSt'�•i'�'�'�^ s)"e':�+�L.Jr••,areTw .m„ 4.._. C� �"7'L� r r!� j a rt�o t �r^�*r+., ism,p y1 {'tl,p i'x •,S{, ,$rr•'#' ��rr rfi�I�.; .. 9 '� �+1i''h �1 §u ,.rr�.I#+ ''4:,!'V1',Yrti11 a� �Yu'r. h'+t���5r, :.�' "ra l ,�,,,�r�C� � a„44 rJ''•.1.,»�4 �T��a r i n ,,;yhY=+.�,i`3. ��{{ � d1�ift,.g, �p I!�J !��R UI f;If �A{' {*�+FN•��� kkkh��. r .:1�1� V"� I�`,14'F, r � '��xP#t' <y 1 !y I s s ,•� � � �.� � �^'t; �M.'y, �-�,rf,F�'t1r J�y#rs�r rnf +cr v "� Mn '-�f��'h E' Pt r � �I�,I, wf(ur II'p � } a i 1F�N"u;Sfriy_r' aa4 T''�"'.! h£kPkW4 -04CI�+�f�r^wlJra �.mv7� fir Jvuar �3ft FM1I � t '## ��MF dW�r �9°d ;fi°I r � �t�j�I+�� ��"��tJ�� � •,"� ���4RNX i�t$ 9;F°*�'� - �P i, N! � 1 tP ii� dFrhulC(, lk,� i#ubr u�rL fYht Now j�--- '� rr✓+1 e I r 'u� y a,Fs 4k + .tir'4 S� r syr FG 1 �1' eti Y' It . ir t'us '✓ r ,,�[i ! t �qu r J'r7 +r S' so IOU.*3 t n{, � '., 1e .'i V i.:. �d �,'�u �• '��a4 tF �,.i ,�� + ��'� d u,�," � Xc.ror tPol kis"pl,?„ �f } - — •' p !s l'.+Yd q. + f til It+ IrT xl '' §iu4xroFs t 1r VA '^ is'u�l"' N .'ra"kt.","� Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 Beach/Edinger Corridor Example Opportunity Sites APN # Zoning Existing Use/Site Conditions Anticipated Area size Density. #of Units s.f acres 153-051-10,- CG Multi-tenant commercial strip 200 units 152,198 s.f. 57 du/acre 11 center, constructed late 1970s, ex. (3.5 acres) Uses include—church tenant, martial arts training center, site conditions—fair; vacant parcel( 1 acre 159-031-10,- CG 2 single-tenant buildings (approx, 4aB 126 405,255 70,971s.f. 6277 du/acre 16,-17,49; 10,000 s.f. &6,000 s.f.)— units (2-41.62 acres) 159-101-01 constructed late 1960s/early 1970s —tire store, restaurant, site conditions—poor/fair,uasaat � � i i � i i • • — � � SOi dR � � � ff "s 'Y �' r t! � s � 1 r i 'a. � .F d' r • Res. No. 2012-24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on May 7, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CJ4 Clerk and ex-offici Jerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ORDINANCE NO. 3949 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE BEACH AND EDINGER CORRIDORS SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT 2.1.4 TOWN CENTER-NEIGHBORHOOD SEGMENT BY REMOVING THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION FROM PROPERTY LISTED AS (APN# 142-073-03) (ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002) WHEREAS,the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate,duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002,which removes the residential designation from certain property(APN# 142-073- 03)located in the Town Center-Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors j I Specific Plan(Specific Plan); and j I The real property that is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property")is generally located on the north side of Center Avenue and east of Gothard Street, and is more particularly described in the map and legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference; and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented,the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan; NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the residential required designation of the Subject Property is hereby removed(Exhibit B)and all other zoning and development standards remain as set forth in the Specific Plan. 12-320in5854 1 Ordinance No. 3949 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of ,2012. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I�n City Clerk Cit Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIA APPROVED: City Manager erector of Planning and Building ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Map and Legal Description Exhibit B: Amended Town Center-Neighborhood Segment Map 12-320in5854 2 Ordinance No. 3949 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Parcels 1 and2 of Parcel Map No. 90-327,in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 279 Page 33 and 34 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcel Number 142-073-03 I i I I i I SITE MAP (APN 142-073-03) SEE SPECIAL PAGE 142-079 FOR FEE TITLE ASSESSMENT BELOW SURFACE S 1/2. SEC. 14. T 5 Ss R 11 W 0.076 AC. 9.33' 32 7.25' 30 31 109.fi5' 125.91' VERMONT STREET PL AN _a (SUGAR AVENUE) AVENUE HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 100' 76' ?9 100'. S!f o Y cROUN N, GROUND -- E�.=+'• ' us.91' @ 36.9 Y -Jllq PROJECT SITE o a ELEVATION CD CLI� VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 100' 5 M GL O -..3,. "DETAIL A" 2 4.f 2. � 25.48 AC. e 8 AC. A, Q- \\ 073 34 4 169-4 EVES T COLLEGE 2.696 AC. m I tie __J 226.E+ y1.se pVE, STREET 17 CENTER CENTER 58E 148-30-41F-P4m. J. AC. � 16 -c 58f I18�38�1A-0i ~' 393.66 416.0 D 2 W 163.65 _ �`•076 - 7+2.26' O 32 AC. 33 2.334- Ordinance No. 3949 i I-II IT Ordinance No. 3949 Zoning Text Amendment No. -002 Proposed City of ECSP Westminster (Zoning) R dent Map Pen y RQ ® North ntingt n C ter 1 a Spec! Pi an (S ) Public-Semipublic ' (PS) + Bella Terra Specific Plan Town Center (SP13) Bouiev ard Segment Town Center Cor ow enter Boulevard Segment To n C nter Bou evard Segment a U esidential - —Etes�iI i Industrial Industrial edium High Ln`l General General Density �RQ Y (IG) (RNIH) i 00 500 0 1,11 0 -O FN U FINDINGS ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002: 1. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 amends the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) Town Center— Neighborhood segment to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the Skate Park Project site. Although the "Residential Required" designation is removed, a range of allowable uses would remain for the Town Center— Neighborhood segment, including housing, and the subject request does not change the allowed density of the site. The proposed change will be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City's General Plan because the allowable uses will sustain the City's economic viability and provide for the commercial, employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and recreation needs of existing and future City residents and visitors. The loss of the site for potential housing is offset by seven other candidate sites that could be rezoned for housing only as identified in General Plan Amendment No. 11-002. 2. In the case of general land use provisions, the proposed change is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will remove the "Residential Required" designation for the project site. However, a range of allowable uses would remain for the project site in the Town Center— Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. Those land uses allow for mixed-use developments consistent with the General Plan. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will facilitate the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community. The facility will improve the City's fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events. The skate park will be developed with a high quality architectural and landscape design to complement a diversity of surrounding uses and developments, particularly along the Center Avenue corridor. In addition, the City has adequate other sites that can accommodate housing to address the City's share of regional housing needs. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity of public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will facilitate the development of a public skate park that contributes to the livability of the surrounding areas by meeting the recreational needs of residents and visitors and is already a permitted use in the Town Center-Neighborhood district. The proposed change to not require residential on the site will result in rezoning of other parcels in the BECSP for residential only. Residential uses are already permitted in all BECSP districts and therefore would be consistent with established zoning. F) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3946, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.76 Relating to Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees;" and, G) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3947, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Municipal Code by Adding Chapter 17.73 Relating to the General Provisions for Development Impact Fees." 9 Speakers Motion to continue to the June 4, 2012 City Council meeting to review staff, Dwyer, Hansen options for implementation Approved 6-1 (Shaw no) 10. Adopt Resolution No. 2012-24 approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002; and, approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3949 approving Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 removing the Housing Designation on the Project Site (The Skate Park Project) Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: A) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 by adopting Resolution No. 2012-24, "A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002;" and, B) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for approval and approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3949, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan District 2.1.4 Town Center— Neighborhood Segment by Removing the Residential Designation from Property Listed as (APN # 142-073-03);" and, C) Approve CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations — EIR No. 10-009. 2 Speakers Approved 7-0 11. Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3950 approving a 5-year extension of time to the existing Amended and Restated Development Agreement with Mayer Financial, LP and The Waterfront Hotel, LLC for the Waterfront Development adopted on October 21, 1998 Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3950, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Adopting the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Development Agreement By and Between City of Huntington Beach, Mayer Financial, L.P., and the Waterfront Hotel, LLC' approving a 5-year extension of time to the existing Amended and Restated Development Agreement for the Waterfront Development adopted on October 21, 1998. The existing Development Agreement is set to expire on October 21, 2013 and the 5-year extension would permit the Development Agreement to expire on October 21, 2018. 1 Speaker City Council/PFA Regular Meeting May 7, 2012 -6- '?" Nr u-ucr✓�� Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: P_b 6/V. App ve ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied Cit lerk;g Sign re Council Meeting Date: May 7, 2012 Department ID Number: PL 12-011 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2012-24 approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002; and, adopt Ordinance No. 3949 approving Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 removing the Housing Designation on the Project Site (The Skate Park Project) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request by VF Outdoor, Inc. to amend the General Plan Housing Element to remove the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue for exclusively residential use and to amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the vacant project site located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street. The Planning Commission approved the amendments and is recommending approval along with staff (Recommended Action). Staff recommended approval of the request to the Planning Commission and is recommending the City Council approve the General Plan and Zoning Text amendments. Financial Impact: Not Applicable. Planning Commission and--Staff Recommended Action: A) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 by adopting Resolution No. 2012-24, "A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002" (ATTACHMENT NO. 1); and, B) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for approval and adopt Ordinance No. 3949, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan District 2.1.4 Town Center— Neighborhood Segment by Removing the Residential Designation from Property Listed as (APN # 142-073-03)" (ATTACHMENT NO. 3); and, Item 10. - 1 xB -444- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 C) Approve CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations — EIR No. 10-009 (ATTACHMENT NO. 10). Planning Commission Action on March 27, 2012: The motion made by Ryan, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 11-002, Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 and CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations and forward to the City Council, with findings for approval carried by the following vote: AYES: Delgleize, Peterson, Ryan, Shier Burnett NOES: Bixby, Mantini ABSENT: Farley ABSTAIN: MOTION PASSED Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. "Continue General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 and direct staff accordingly." 2. "Deny General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for denial." Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: VF Outdoor, Inc., 6500 Katella Avenue, Cypress CA 90630 Property Owner: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach CA 92648 Location: 7461 Center Avenue, 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street) General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 represents a request by the applicant to amend the City's General Plan Housing Element to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) and the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6) to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. Zoning Map Amendment No. 11-002 represents a request by the applicant to amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the vacant project site located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street. HB -445- Item 10. - 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 The reason for the requests is to permit the development of a public skate park. The General Plan Housing Element specifies that the 2.7-acre site will be designated exclusively for residential uses and indicates that the City intends for the site to be developed with a minimum of 175 affordable units. In addition, the site is designated in the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (Town Center— Neighborhood) as "Residential Required". In order to permit the development of the proposed skate park, an amendment to the General Plan Housing Element and a Zoning Text Amendment to the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan is required to remove the housing designation on the project site. B. BACKGROUND: The project site consists of approximately 2.7 acres located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street. The project site is bounded by McFadden Avenue on the north, a Union Pacific Railroad track to the east, Center Avenue to the south, and Southern California Edison (SCE) property with overhead electrical transmission lines to the west. The site is currently vacant and has never been developed with urban uses. The project site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: On March 27, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report and the proposed land use amendments. Comments at the hearing were received from 3 individuals and all spoke in support of the project. Speakers in support of the project discussed the positive benefits of the development, including a world class recreational facility in the City of Huntington Beach, a skate park with design elements that appeal to both professional and amateur skaters, and a place with a family-oriented atmosphere for the whole community. The Planning Commission reviewed the environmental impact report, general plan amendment, and zoning text amendment. Some issues of discussion included the following: • additional recreational opportunities for the children of the City of Huntington Beach ■ no parking issues at the project site because the kids would be dropped off by. their parents ■ appropriateness of the location for the skate park • noise, parking and traffic impacts to the surrounding properties ® fair share contribution to street improvements per the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan ® contribution of the project to the fiscal viability of the City from increased revenues from visitors of the skate park The Planning Commission certified the EIR as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements and approved the General Plan Amendment by approving the draft City Council Resolution and the Zoning Text Amendment with findings for approval by approving the draft City Council Resolution. No appeal to the Environmental Impact Report was filed. Item 10. - 3 HB -446- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The primary planning issues related to the requests pertain to the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and the overall conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. General Plan Amendment The 2.7-acre project site is currently designated in the General Plan Housing Element for up to 175 affordable housing units towards fulfilling the City's affordable housing needs as determined in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). With the proposed skate park project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan Housing Element to remove the housing designation on the project site. There is no change to the General Plan designation for the subject site; it remains Mixed Use — Specific Plan Overlay — Design Overlay. The City of Huntington Beach, through the Housing Element, is required to show how the City's share of the RHNA, as determined by the Southern California Association of Governments, can be met. The RHNA allocation for the City is 2,092 units, distributed among the following income groups: 454 very low income, 369 low income, 414 moderate income, and 855 above moderate income units. Because of a shortfall in vacant sites necessary to fulfill the lower and moderate income housing needs, the City was required to commit to a rezoning program in the 2008 Housing Element update. Pursuant to AB 2348, a rezoning program to provide adequate sites to address a RHNA shortfall must adhere to the following parameters: ® Sites must be rezoned to accommodate 100% of the RHNA shortfall for very low and low income units ® Rezoned sites for lower income households must accommodate residential uses "by right" ® Rezoned sites must be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units • At least 50% of sites rezoned to address the lower income housing shortfall need to be accommodated on sites designated for exclusively residential use At the time of the Housing Element update, the City was working on the BECSP. Because the BECSP was being structured to allow most residential projects by right (with a Site Plan Review), the City chose to designate sites within the BECSP area for the rezoning program. The Housing Element identified five potential sites. Ultimately, to address the City's lower income RHNA shortfall of 352 units on exclusively residential sites (50% of total 704 lower income RHNA shortfall), the project site and a site on Delaware Street (south of Main Street) were rezoned in the BECSP. With the development of the skate park being proposed at the project site, the amendment to the General Plan Housing Element to remove reference to the project site is necessary, as well as to demonstrate that the City has adequate other opportunities to replace the units at another to-be-rezoned site(s). The City's 2008 General Plan Housing Element identified three other sites with a combined potential unit yield of 210. As part of the subject General Plan Amendment, the City has identified three additional sites that could potentially yield approximately 725 units (ATTACHMENT NO. 1). Thus, as amended the General Plan Housing Element HB -447- Item 10. - 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 demonstrates that the City has adequate sites that could be rezoned to satisfy State requirements. The legislative draft of the proposed changes to the City's Housing Element has been sent to the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Their comments will be forwarded when received. State Law requires that replacement site(s) be rezoned in order for a City to have a certified Housing Element. If the City does not complete the rezoning before the next Housing Element cycle, which begins October 1, 2013, the "unaccommodated need" carries over to the next Housing Element cycle and the rezoning would need to be done within the first year of the next cycle. Until such time that this occurs, the City's Housing Element would not be certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Finally, state law encourages the rezoning to occur as soon as possible so that there is time in the planning period of the Housing Element cycle for a project to potentially be developed. It is anticipated that the City Council will provide direction to staff regarding the sites to be rezoned when the subject requests are considered by them. Although the rezoning of alternate sites within the City is not being processed at this time, the proposed General Plan Amendment demonstrates that the City can fulfill the goals and policies of the General Plan to provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs. Zoninq Text Amendment The project site is located in the Town Center— Neighborhood segment of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The BECSP currently designates the site as "Residential Required" and any future development would require residential units. In order to develop the proposed skate park, a Zoning Text Amendment to the BECSP is required to remove the housing designation on the project site. The Town Center — Neighborhood segment of the BECSP allows for a mix of uses, ranging from retail uses to civic and cultural uses and from office uses to residential uses. If the "Residential Required" designation on the project site is removed by the Zoning Text Amendment, a range of allowable uses would remain for the project site in the Town Center — Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. The development of a skate park, as a recreation facility, is categorized as a civic and cultural use which is permitted with a Site Plan Review and would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan to sustain the City's economic vitality. Finally, State law requires that if a jurisdiction reduces the density of any parcel identified in the Housing Element to meet housing need that it make certain findings. The proposed Zoning Text Amendment does not change the allowed density of the parcel (there is no maximum in the BECSP), and should the Skate Park project not go forward a residential project would still be allowed on the subject parcel pursuant to the property's Town Center- Neighborhood designation. Nonetheless, as discussed in the General Plan Amendment analysis above, the City has adequate remaining sites to offset the loss of potential housing on the subject site and the proposed Zoning Text Amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan. E. SUMMARY: Item 10. - 5 HB -448- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 The proposed amendments facilitate the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community. In addition, the amendments improve the City's fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events. With the development of a recreational facility, the skate park complements a diversity of uses within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan area, particularly along Center Avenue corridor. The amendments demonstrate that the City has adequate sites to fulfill Housing Element goals. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment based on the suggested findings of approval as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff. Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts were analyzed and discussed by the Planning Commission on March 27, 2012. Prior to the Planning Commission's action on General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002, the Planning Commission reviewed and acted on Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009. The Planning Commission certified EIR No. 10-009 as adequate and complete with mitigation measures, findings of fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Although the project results in adverse impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated or avoided, the City Council may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is adopted. CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. In this particular case, staff believes the economic and social benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impact to Land Use and Planning and Noise. The adverse impacts are unavoidable because it has been determined that no feasible mitigation is available. Approval of the project would allow for the development of a new skate park. The project would have the following benefits: 1. The proposed project would provide a new state-of-the-art skate park and associated retail/concession use that would be located in close proximity to public transit facilities and residential communities. 2. The project would provide additional year-round, fee-free recreational opportunities within the City through provision of a state-of-the-art skate park on land owned by the City. 3. The project would increase the City's tax revenue through sales tax from retail sales and periodic special events. HB -449- Item 10. - 6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/7/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-011 4. The project would improve the visual quality and character of the project site through implementation of the design standards contained in the BECSP, including architectural features, lighting, signage, and landscaping. 5. The project would minimize consumption of natural resources through implementation of sustainability features such as drought-tolerant landscaping, efficient lighting and plumbing fixtures, skylights, and waste recycling facilities. Following approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment the Planning Commission approved the CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (ATTACHMENT NO. 10). In order to approve the project, the City Council must also take the same action. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance economic development Attachment(s): 1. City Council Resolution No. 2012-24, "A Resolution of the City Council of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002" 2. Suggested Findings for Approval—Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 3. Ordinance No. 3949, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Beach And Edinger Corridors Specific Plan District 2.1.4 Town Center-Neighborhood Segment by Removing the Residential Designation from Property (APN# 142-073-03) (Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 " 4. Planning Commission EIR Staff Report dated March 27, 2012 5. Planning Commission GPA and ZTA Staff Report dated March 27, 2012 6. Project Narrative dated March 11, 2012 7. Final EIR No. 10-009, includes Draft EIR, EIR Appendices, Response to Comments and Text Changes (Not Attached — Available for Public Review at the Planning and Zoning Counter— 3rd Floor, City Hall 8. Existing BECSP Zoning Map 9. Proposed BECSP (Zoning) Map 10. CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations — EIR No. 10- 009 11. PowerPoint Presentation Slides Item 10. - 7 HB -450- ATTACHMENT # 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-.:2.+ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 proposes to amend the Housing Element 1)to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) and 2)to update the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6)to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-002; and The City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. The Amendment demonstrates that the City has adequate sites that can accommodate housing to address the City's share of regional housing needs. NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the General Plan is amended pursuant to Amendment No. 11-002, which amends the Housing Element 1) to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City- 12-3201/75855 1 Resolution No. 2012-24 owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) and 2)to update the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6)to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of Nay , 2012. Mayor REVIE# AZPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City a er C ty Attorn y ,rn V 3- -% 3 INITI fED � D APPROVED: irec or o Planning and Building Exhibit "A" - General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 12-3201/75855 2 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11 -002 Table IV-6 Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan — Example Mixed Use Projects & Opportunity Sites Projects Number of New Site Project Density lJinits Acreage Edinger Avenue The Ripcurl 440 apartment units 3.8 acres 115 units/acre The Village at Bella Terra" 500 units 15.8 acres 32 units/acre Watt Development Property 600 units 13.8 acres 44 units/acre former Levitz property 1,260 units 12.5 acres 101 units/acre Beach Boulevard Beach &Warner 270 units 9.4 acres 29 units/acre Beach & Ellis (sec) 120 units 2.6 acres 46 units/acre Opportunity Sites Beach& Ellis (nwc) 450126 units 2 4 1.62 6277 units/acre acres Beach&Yorktown (nec) 200 units 3.5 acres 57 units/acre Tota l 34,6140 3.516 u n its *Located on Edinger in The Crossings Specific Plan adjacent to Beach/Edinger Specific Plan area. Rezoning for Exclusively Residential Use As a means of complying with AB 2348 which requires at least half of sites rezoned to address a lower income RHNA shortfall to be designated exclusively for residential uses, the City has identified sites bets within and adjaGe the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan appropriate for development as entirely residential. The City will Fezon�bree OF MGFe ef the sites are identified in Table IV-7 (illustrated in Figure 9). enESFnpa-sing Blvd) and a-RedevelepmeRt AgeRGY GWRed-sit2-eR MGF=adden A tee"'`e adiamooRt to GoldeRWeSt �rrc«.-u�..�u College. The City pp i hi+ + ing Sites 4 aR 5-� As GUFFen+ i able +o GGMMn rezoning - part of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan adoption in March 2010, Site 4 was rezoned as entirely residential. Determination of which of the other sites among-1-3 will be redesignated for exclusively residential will need to be confirmed as part of the BeaGWF=-linger cnenifin ol,:, nrogess an additional zone change. Rezoning of t#Fee --- - one or more of the additional sites in Table IV-7 will more than address the Cit s lower income RHNA shortfall for 352 units on exclusively residential sites (50% of total 704 lower income RHNA shortfall). 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-16 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 Table IV-7 Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use. Map# location Current Anticipated Site ' Denslty; Zoning: #of units Acreage 1 Beach Blvd, GGSP14 70 2.12 33 du/ac S. of Yorktown 2 Cypress and Elm, GGSP14 40 .76 30 du/ac behind Beach Blvd. 3 Beach Blvd, Sr-'SP14 100 3.14 31 du/ac N. of Yorktown 4 pasi#isa SP2-14 187 3.13 60 du/ac SpesifiG War} Delaware St, S. of Main St 5 AAsFF��,��ve lG 4-75 2-7 65 U/as 5 Beach Blvd, N. of SP14 24 .78 30 du/ac Main St 6 Gothard St, S. of SP14 110 1.32 32 du/ac Edin er Ave 7 Beach Blvd, N. of SP14 52 1.04 50 du/ac Slater Ave Total M583 There are three adjacent vacant parcels held under the same ownership. The total yield could be 81 units. However, the three other parcels do not individually meet the criteria under AB 2348 and therefore are not included above. The City used the following process to develop the inventory of sites for rezoning to exclusively residential use. As part of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, a "micro- vulnerability" analysis was conducted along Beach Boulevard to identify those sites most vulnerable to change from existing use (refer to Appendix A). City staff then evaluated these sites to determine which would be most appropriate for redesignation to an exclusively residential use, and identified sites 1-37 on Table IV-7. As depicted in the Rezoning Sites Table and accompanying aerial photos in Appendix A, these sites are characterized by a mix of older, economically marginal uses; parking lots; and vacant parcels - all factors contributing to their identification as vulnerable to change. The City's consultant for the Specific Plan estimated the dwelling unit potential on each of these sites based on an expected residential product type, providing the basis for the units identified in Table IV-7. The Beach/Edinger Specific Plan is structured as a form based Development Code, and does not establish maximum residential densities. The densities presented for sites 1-37 are not prescribed and do not represent maximum densities, but rather reflect the anticipated density based on an assumed product type. Site #4 in Table IV-7 falls just outside was rezoned as part of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan within the PaGifiGa GammwRity Plan. The four parcels that comprise this former hospital site consist of surface parking lots, and a medical office building slated for demolition. A portion of this site had a previous proposal for development with 130 senior condominiums, and several developers have expressed an interest to the City in developing the site with housing at densities ranging from 70-80 units/acre. Tie 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-17 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 Although Site #4 consists of 4 separate parcels, all of the parcels are held under one ownership and would be required to be consolidated prior to development of the site. Additionally, all but one of the parcels would be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units if sold and developed separately. It should be noted that the parcel that would not be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units is tied to an adjacent parcel and would not be developed on its own as it is substandard in size and does not have street access. Sate #5 is a 2.7 aGFe vaGaRt Sate OR MGFaddeR AveRwe adjaGeRt tG Golden West College affordable housing. The AgeRGY MeRds to issue a Request for QualifiGatkms on Mid- 2008 to i;en profit heusing developers foF development of the site, and Gemplete RegetiatiORS with the seleGted developeF by yeaF end; ellViFaRmental review an the site 175 affbrdable YRitS OR the site. This pmpeFty 06 GUrrently designated for Mixed Use RR the GeReral Plan and zoned General lRdustrial; the Gity will aR;ei;d the GeReFal PIa-R nit Zoning for this site to allow only residential use. Site #5 is a 0 78-acre site located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, north of Main Street In 2010, the parcel was rezoned and included in the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, which allows for mixed use development. The L-shaped vacant site is a single parcel with a narrow 60 ft frontage along Beach Boulevard and widening along the west (rear) property line The City estimates approximately 24 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment development standards and guidelines. Site #6 is a 1 32-acre site located on the east side of Gothard Street, south of Edinger Avenue In 2010, the parcel was rezoned and included in the Town Center Boulevard Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, which allows for mixed use development The privately owned parcel currently has an approximates 24,000 sq, ft. building, which is occupied by an industrial tenant on a month to month lease and a surface parking lot with 37 parking spaces. Although the site is developed, there has been strong interest in redevelopment of the site for residential The property is currently for sale and the property owner received various offers from residential developers to build a multi-family housing project. The City has met with several prospective developers to discuss low-income housing funding availability. The City estimates approximately 110 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Town Center Boulevard Segment development standards and guidelines. Site #7 is a 1 04-acre vacant site located on the east side of Beach Boulevard, north of Slater Avenue. In 2010, the site was rezoned and included in the Neighborhood Boulevard Segment of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, which 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-18 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 allows for mixed use development. The City estimates approximately 52 units could be developed on the parcel in accordance with the Neighborhood Boulevard Segment development standards and guidelines. Adequacy of Rezoning Program to Address RHNA Shortfall As indicated in Table IV-5, Huntington Beach has a shortfall of currently zoned sites to accommodate a portion of its regional housing needs for 704 lower income and 311 moderate income units. The City is committing to a rezoning program as part of the Housing Element (Program #9A) to provide adequate sites at appropriate densities to address this shortfall, and to address the following parameters of AB 2348: a) rezoned sites for lower income households provide for residential uses "by right"; b) rezoned sites accommodate a minimum of 16 units; c) at least 50% of sites rezoned to address the lower income housing shortfall are accommodated on sites designated for exclusively residential use. By way of example of high density residential sites to become available as part of the overall 5,000 unit capacity within the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, Table IV-6 illustrates eight specific opportunity sites and proposed mixed use projects. These eight sites alone provide capacity for over 3,500 units, seven of which provide densities appropriate to support lower income development, and one site with densities suitable to support moderate income development. Through the rezoning to occur as part of the adoption of the Beach/Edinger Specific Plan, the City has provided suitable sites to address the City's RHNA shortfall for 311 moderate income units, and 352 lower income units permitted to be part of a mixed use development. Table IV-7 demonstrates the City's site capacity to address its shortfall of 352 lower income units on sites designated for exclusively residential use, and one of the sites, Site #4, was rezoned in 2010. It is estimated that this site could yield 187 units. Thus, the remaining shortfall would be 165 units which could be accommodated with rezoning of one or more of the other sites in Table IV-7. 5. Availability of Infrastructure and Public Services As a completely urbanized community, the City of Huntington Beach has already in place all of the necessary infrastructure to support future development. All land designated for residential use is served by sewer and water lines, streets, storm drains, and telephone, electrical, and gas lines. However, as an older community, much of the City's infrastructure is aging and will require improvements or replacement over time. The timing and funding of improvements need to be closely correlated with development phasing. The City has adopted an Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan that identifies needed improvement(s) and associated costs. 2008-2014 HOUSING ELEMENT IV-19 HOUSING RESOURCES Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 APPENDIX RESIDENTIAL SITES INVENTORY Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use (Amended Pages) Beach/Edinger Corridor Example Opportunities Sites (Amended Pages) Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-24 Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use City of Huntington Beach Key APN Location Current Existing Uses/ Anticipated Area sq.ft. Density Map# Zoning Site Conditions #of units (acres) 1 025-191- Beach Blvd, S. of GGSP14 State-owned 70 92,411 33 du/ac 03 Yorktown property; Caltrans (2.12) (Beenh Ed nner maintenance yard; trailer buildings 2 165-364- Cypress and GGSP14 3 vacant parcels 40 32,921 30 du/ac 04,-06,- Elm, behind (0.76) 24 Beach Blvd (BeaGlhf in/Edger 3 025-180- Beach Blvd, N. GGSP14 8 parcels, existing 100 136,785 31 du/ac 06,-13,- of Yorktown uses ranging from (3.14) 14,-15,- (Rennh Edinger poor to good: 21,-23,- Sppesifis RlaR) Partially vacant— 24,-25 cars being stored on property; 1950's house converted to medical office; produce stand; Big O Tires; mattress store; vacant commercial building; 1960's buildings;. 4* 159-121- Beach Blvd SP214 Existing medical 187 136,348 60 du/ac 25,-26,- Delaware St, S. building— building (3.13) 37,-38 of Main{PaGifiGa permit issued for (partial) Spesif+^ 124a4i) demolition; surface parking lot 5 1^��- MGFadden IG VaGaal:; 475 118,497 65 du/aG 03 Avenue adjacent Redevelopme# College 4gennv}n issue RFQ /ReaGh/Ed#K er # g ` r` fi Spenifin Dlen\ de,i�elopmeRt,e,ith affordable he 5 159-031- Beach Blvd, N. SP14 Vacant 24 34,284 30 18 of Main 0.78 du/ac 6 142-511- Gothard St, S. SP14 Existing industrial 110 57,639 32 05 of Edinger building; surface (1.32) du/ac arkin lot 7 167-325- Beach Blvd, N. SP14 Vacant 52 46,162 50 -21 of Slater IL.041 du/ac 57-2583 'Rezoned in 2010. 7.� - fir. "4'♦♦ F }�f t:� • k 1�._'' 'Fy ram' 67a, s't F•""i�'-_" V. i L �r5'k��r9' '��*i` -� it'4 ?�i x -•..� ff�sl� a f�' t�l g i7 -.i t ✓tw ;��1 � ` } °'wt{"�tirru 1 `. )f �5 ,.z�ir s:.t'�� .st-t S. 3 �"• .: 4 ^a'rty x xy.:^F�4."'..,.+us"�x us '-` r •� t f s f,*� - �i�z._a I �kE� �+a � � ��"�,cp���'STe a,�.;,�•�{�,E'x' _ � :;.L �f r �� OR t � AR. 1i A :hY t �� �`'� p ,.� �#` ` Y�� ��;w•ti k ��. F^ ;fix �� Le ..�t��f� -x.+a4"Sb' �9 f ��k Y � -.. > ''>? ,� ja �,^"',��y�§'• E .s.:"# aJ r 6�yh� . n..,t ,r �.May�' �' .� '•'. .. x^,3wm a'yy'�'A�j}� y � '<�� ns ,,,, wy� `� $' F.'t-,yy4t�y ' � .,�Y��i3 ,gyp �! y'•' .. � > �� - . r p RI URI- ,. '- �;.,...�...•�" :, .. _[. ,_.:'?�.. f ra�ail! Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-24 AN 1 NAPO MVv x . '��'' ��i ✓BSI' �: aF; 4w„t•� FeN-I j F a;- SnJ_w 1 W. WasMM Pg d xr. a"a� -�: IV X �ysz .w �r i p p- d cq t pM N y r I I� 11 c t t i, I i F r atei d, J y_ 1. � `��•� ;r I I :.� fl ikc4 r e :;h:. r� t .,. IK- r .f rp r of r.•i� 1 ^i 7 1t I-�Ir:l.,tt s "t � ,..�tb.f�' .r s 7� y 1rz,ILM zV� t.• x ."�'w`r}3 „a��t� I I ( aay E ,`"'�Ta"k+ •Y"EA _ ' fr �,� •# YF.,�'� r a Ig'i�y,�. ¢gf � �a ' t •NTv �,y P.i '2`�-``��.ii t n{s�•a•tt, .4 .�.eT 3 tffi� x- .■w.., ate'.'+ .;r _ �f �r t� � 5-.3 ifi�t �, rt ti .•a �- -r. /7 '•, .o� •e.ts., a. 3 7 h �F{•'t 4 Y- `- � f t h e E J s . .�?-' J�:tia I JIs§I,,{: ,Y'•w�' ►'om E✓ �� I' ,.r y t a"dr :� � 3 ;^`tom 'f, �� .h.R f j I I d }. e 4 1'� xc`x` � }� !•f r,- JAB€ o—t I�� Its.lyf,�&L .•:..;r=[� �rP•� « �a €3. ; I r � �,s3 gS� c:-- 11�9t'•n a y�it'. aa" a II a 1 (( 4a bJ � f p rr I�I+ � yt,t�,)• � � ' ."� L ..# A` tom_... -::nY3.�W:..� Exhibit"A" - Resolution No. 2012-24 Beach/Edinger Corridor Example Opportunity Sites APN # Zoning Existing Use/Site Conditions Anticipated Area size Density` ` #of Units s.f.:(acres) 153-051-10,- CG Multi-tenant commercial strip 200 units 152,198 s.f. 57 du/acre 11 center, constructed late 1970s, ex. (3.5 acres) Uses include—church tenant, martial arts training center, site conditions—fair; vacant parcel ( 1 acre 159-031-10,- CG 2 single-tenant buildings (approx. 450126 455,255 70,971s.f. 6277 du/acre 16,-17,49; 10,000 s.f. &6,000 s.f.)— units (2-41.62 acres) 159-101-01 constructed late 1960s/early 1970s —tire store, restaurant, site conditions— poor/fair,uacan Ws .( �a �,+ 3 x t t•Y 1' w x 3 � ���,�I 'f, �E 'f � t^. iT._�.,. 7 _ f - �.' � �(s,..a-E K .i.r..cT...,# .� Y �k`x 1,�� ��'.. +��.�L"�'_ r��.:ilk'■ 4 I NEY i � � s�1 � yr 1!t '�`x� - •.; 4d E 41 hO 3 d� }}h,,ai� 4� �"'kR�WN •�T�'� 1E � flYhw":-. '. .ts4�n.> ;.�'ir.f_� 'r�l.� 'T.'�...i d�EM'iwh�A �: �»�rr.._.'d�-'�•a,IFa'ra... ..�. � .,.�'�...- - Yr �- • '• — �— • • • �r��r �-'r'��`r �, �m $ xa::•� � vA-' pis .��� 8� f l �( ��J+�t •' � v' ��r ��� � s' ,gam � ��, �� art� � $,+��``���_�N�`�' ✓ t- �a-� . Eat � !y C&"I Res. No. 2012-24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on IIIIIay 7, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Shaw, Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None C1W Clerk and ex-officitherk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #2 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL.—ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002: 1. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 amends the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) Town Center — Neighborhood segment to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the Skate Park Project site. Although the "Residential Required" designation is removed, a range of allowable uses would remain for the Town Center—Neighborhood segment, including housing, and the subject request does not change the allowed density of the site. The proposed change will be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the City's General Plan because the allowable uses will sustain the City's economic viability and provide for the commercial, employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and recreation needs of existing and future City residents and visitors. The loss of the site for potential housing is offset by seven other candidate sites that could be rezoned for housing only as identified in General Plan Amendment No. 11-002. 2. In the case of general land use provisions, the proposed change is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will remove the "Residential Required" designation for the project site. However, a range of allowable uses would remain for the project site in the Town Center — Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. Those land uses allow for mixed-use developments consistent with the General Plan. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will facilitate the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community. The facility will improve the City's fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events. The skate park will be developed with a high quality architectural and landscape design to complement a diversity of surrounding uses and developments, particularly along the Center Avenue corridor. In addition, the City has adequate other sites that can accommodate housing to address the City's share of regional housing needs. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity of public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 will facilitate the development of a public skate park that contributes to the livability of the surrounding areas by meeting the recreational needs of residents and visitors and is already a permitted use in the Town Center-Neighborhood district. The proposed change to not require residential on the site will result in rezoning of other parcels in the BECSP for residential only. Residential uses are already permitted in all BECSP districts and therefore would be consistent with established zoning. Item 10. - 23 HB -466- ATTACHMENT #3 ORDINANCE NO. 3949 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE BEACH AND EDINGER CORRIDORS SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT 2.1.4 TOWN CENTER-NEIGHBORHOOD SEGMENT BY REMOVING THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION FROM PROPERTY LISTED AS (APN4 142-073-03) (ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002) WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002, which removes the residential designation from certain property (APN4 142-073- 03) located in the Town Center-Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan(Specific Plan); and The real property that is the subject of this Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") is generally located on the north side of Center Avenue and east of Gothard Street, and is more particularly described in the map and legal description attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference; and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the residential required designation of the Subject Property is hereby removed (Exhibit B) and all other zoning and development standards remain as set forth in the Specific Plan. 12-320in5854 1 Ordinance No. 3949 SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 th day of June , 2012. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk YCi Attorney REVIE D APPROVED: INITIAT APPROVED: Y4tager irector of Planning and Building ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Map and Legal Description Exhibit B: Amended Town Center-Neighborhood Segment Map 12-3201/75854 2 Ordinance No. 3949 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Parcels 1 and2 of Parcel Map No. 90-327, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 279 Page 33 and 34 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcel Number 142-073-03 SITE MAP (APN 142-073-03) SEE SPECIAL PAGE 142-079 FOR FEE T 1 TL E ASSESSMENT BELOW SURFACE S112. SEC. 14, T 5 S. R 11 W 0.076 AC. 7.25' 30 31 109.65' 12s.91' VEREET S TREE T PLAN (SUGAR AVENUE) AVENUE HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" _ 100' GROUN GROUND EE•`A7'0� 125.91' @ 36.9 PROJECT SITE El•=21.500' sa EL E VA T 1ON CD VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 100' 'j: "DETAIL A" 0 0 h 4.1 zr 25.48 AC- ,e SAC. ;A Q- � (D 073 s9 W P.M. 34 WES T COL L EGE 169-4 A a 2.696 AC. m tiQ 226.BA' 91.Z6 AVE. �7 STREET mCENTER CENTER SBE 148-30-41f-fA9. J. 7 1� �yti cfPJ �S .ZJ AC. o �/ 80' V SBf I�B-30-CIA-11 W 2 393.60 /1�076 A16. 0 D2 -v JA2.Z6' 0 183.65 RZ�148.34 c. 33 11 2.334 a.en er_ 1.033AC. '�qC, Ordinance No. 3949 EXHIBIT B Ordinance No. 3949 Zoning Text Amendment No. 11 -002 Proposed SECS P City of Westminster (Zoning) �i i R ent(a Map b� � p _. Dens i y_ _ i - North f-luntingtfln I, I` Center'Pl _- �� Specif,�; an a V0s (Sp- Public-Semipublic (Ps) Bella_Terra _ I Specific - -- Plan_ p Town C nter Boulev rd Segm nt Town Center Cor � _ own enter Boulevard eg To n C nter Bou evard Segment ', i Residential _Industrial dj r - Reside ttah Industrial f Generale ediurn High V Low General Density o Densi� (IG) (IG) P� (RMH) �RL, 1,000 00 0 1,000 �;Q6 6 LJ Ord. No. 3949 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on May 07, 2012, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on June 04,2012, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Harper, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Dwyer, Boardman NOES: None ABSENT: Shaw ABSTAIN: None I,Joan L.Flynn,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Huntington Beach Fountain Valley Independent on June 14,2012. In accordance with the City Charter of said City Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk CU Clerk and ex-officio erk Senior Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTAC H M E N T #4 nt City,of Huntington Beach Planning and wild' Departme TAFF REPORT H14111N TON BEACH --- - _ TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess, AICP,Director of Planning and Building BY: Tess Nguyen, Associate Planner DATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-009 (SKATE PARK PROJECT) APPLICANT: VF Outdoor, Inc., 6550 Katella Avenue, Cypress CA 90630 PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 7491 Center Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site on Center Avenue,approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: • Environmental Impact Report(EIR)No. 10-009: Analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment to amend the Housing Element and a Zoning Text Amendment to amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the housing designation on the project site. Analyzes the environment impacts associated with the proposed development of the Skate Park Project, which consists of a 14,000 sq. ft. skate park plaza, a 13,000 sq. ft. skate bowl area, a 3,500 sq. ft. skate shop/concession/restroom building, a 15,000 sq. ft. turf/walking area, a 480 sq. ft. restroom structure, and a 200 sq. ft. entrance kiosk. Documents potential impacts to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, and climate change. - Evaluates three alternatives to the proposed project. Concludes that potential impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels for the project with the exception of impacts to land use and planning and noise, which would remain significant and unavoidable. • Staff s Recommendation: - Certify EIR No. 10-009 because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, identifies project alternatives,provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Program EIR and General Plan policies, and has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). p n_ HB -475- #D_Item 10. - 32 RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Certify FIR No. 10-009 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 1660 (Attachment No. 1)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Continue certification of EIR No. 10-009 and direct staff accordingly." B. "Deny certification of FIR No. 10-009 with findings for denial." PROJECT PROPOSAL: FIR No. 10-009 analyzes the proposed development of a public skate park consisting of a 14,000 sq. ft. skate plaza area, a 13,000 sq. ft. skate bowl area, a 3,500 sq. ft. skate shop/concession/restroom building, a 15,000 sq. ft. turf/walking area, a 480 sq. ft. restroom structure, and a 200 sq. ft. entrance kiosk. The main parking lot is accessed from Center Avenue and a secondary parking area, which is used only for special events, is accessed from McFadden Avenue. The proposed project includes up to 15 special event days throughout the year, expected to draw between 300 to 2,500 spectators with overflow parking located at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex. In order to allow for potential fixture development of a transit stop, the project includes a 20-foot wide by 300-foot long "transit reserve area" at the southeast corner of the project site. The project also includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to the Housing Element and Zoning Text Amendment(ZTA) to the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan as the site is currently designated for housing and this designation would be removed. The applicant has not yet filed a project entitlement for the Skate Park, but has submitted the GPA and ZTA applications, which are being processed concurrently with the EIR. The environmental impact report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, and climate change. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposed project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. The FIR consists of three volumes. Volumes I and II are the Draft FIR and Appendices that were circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. Volume III is the Final FIR, which includes the comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft EIR to clarify or correct information in response to comments or as identified as necessary by staff. These volumes are referenced as Attachment No. 2. Background: The proposed project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-009 is tiered from the BECSP Program FIR where appropriate. nn "-=n--)ort—03/27/12 2 (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 33 HB -476- ISSUES: Subiect Property Land Use,Zoning, and General Plan Desimnations: LOCATION GENERALPLAN , ZONING LA1fJaE` = ; Subject Property: M-sp-d (Mixed Use— SP 14 (Beach and Vacant Specific Plan Overlay— Edinger Corridors Design Overlay) Specific Plan—Town Center Neighborhood) North(across P/OS (Park/Open Space) P-F (Public Facilities) Single Family McFadden Avenue in and RL (Residential — and R-1 (Single Family Residential and the City of Low) Residence) College Park Westminster) of Subject Property: South(across Center M-sp-d SP 14 SCE Transmission Avenue) of Subject Towers, Plant Nursery Property: Storage, and Shopping Center East(across railroad M-sp (Mixed Use- SP 1 (North Huntington Old World Village and tracks) of Subject Specific Plan Overlay) Center Specific Plan) Multi-Family Property: Residential West of Subject M-sp-d SP 14 SCE Transmission Property: Lines and OCTA Transportation Center The project site consists of approximately 2.718 acres located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street. The project site is bounded by McFadden Avenue on the north, a Union Pacific Railroad track to the east, Center Avenue to the south, and Southern California Edison (SCE) property with overhead electrical transmission lines to the west. The site is currently vacant and has never been developed with urban uses. The project site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. General Plan Conformance: The EIR is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: A. Air Quality Element Goal AQ 1: Improve regional air quality by a) decreasing reliance on single occupancy vehicular trips, b) increasing efficiency of transit, c) shortening vehicle trips through a more efficient jobs- housing balance and a more efficient land use pattern, and d) increasing energy efficiency. Policy AQ 1.8.1: Continue to enforce construction site guidelines that require truck operators to minimize particulate emission. PC Staff Report—03/27/12 3 (12sr14 EIR 10-001 HB -477- Item 10. - 34 Policy 0 1.8.2: Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. Policy AQ 1.9: Minimize sensitive uses (residential, hospitals, schools, etc) exposure to toxic emissions. Policy AO 1.10.1: Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all new construction. The EIR analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to implementation of the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would result from construction activities, operation of the skate park use and project-related traffic volumes. Although project-related construction air quality impacts would be less than significant, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.2.1 though MM4.2-14 would be implemented to reduce emissions and minimize sensitive uses surrounding the project site, and exposure to toxic emissions to the extent feasible. The EIR discusses requirements for all projects to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which would also reduce short-term/construction emissions. The analysis in the climate change section of the EIR proposes mitigation measures that are consistent with strategies recommended by the California Climate Action Team and California Air Pollution Control Officers Association for reducing climate change emissions. The EIR also notes that the BECSP requires use of sustainable practices to increase the proposed project's energy efficiency. B. Circulation Element Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Policy CE 2.1.1: Maintain a city-wide level of service (LOS) not to exceed LOS "D" for intersections during the peak hours. Objective CE 2.3: Ensure that the location, intensity and timing of new development is consistent with the provision of adequate transportation infrastructure and standards as defined in the Land Use Element. Objective CE 2.3: Ensure that the location, intensity and timing of new development is consistent with the provision of adequate transportation infrastructure and standards as defined in the Land Use Element. Policy CE 2.3.1: Require development projects to mitigate off-site traffic impacts and pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts to the maximum extent feasible. Goal CE 2.3.4: Require new development mitigate its impact on City streets, including but not limited to,pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts, to maintain adequate levels of service. 11-W"--)ort—03/27/12 4 (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 35 HB -478- The EIR analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on existing transportation and traffic conditions resulting from implementation of the proposed project. A traffic study was conducted by Austin- Foust Associates and analyzed potential adverse traffic impacts on the intersections.surrounding the project site. The project study area includes a total of 11 intersections, one in the City of Westminster (McFadden Avenue and Beach Boulevard) and the remainder in the City of Huntington Beach. The analysis looked at weekend conditions and the shuttle route. When compared to the scope of development anticipated for the project site in the BECSP Program EIR, the EIR documents that daily vehicle trips would be decreased 65 percent and would not result in significant impacts. BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-18 require mitigation of the project's contribution to intersections and freeway ramp determined to be significantly impacted as a result of implementation of the BECSP through payment of fees that would provide the project's fair share toward improving those intersections. The EIR also analyzes the project's potential to create adverse impacts from inadequate parking capacity, alternative transportation policies, and emergency access. With implementation of existing code requirements, mitigation measures adopted for the BECSP and proposed project-specific mitigation measures, impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. C. Environmental Hazards Element Goal EH 1: Ensure that the number of deaths and injuries, levels of property damage, levels of economic and social disruption and interruption of vital services resulting from seismic activity and geologic hazards shall be within acceptable levels of risk. Objective EH 1.1: Ensure that land use planning in the City accounts for seismic and geologic risk, including groundshaking, liquefaction, subsidence, soil and slope stability and water table levels. O iective EH 1.2: Ensure that new structures are designed to minimize damage resulting from seismic hazards, ensure that existing unsafe structures are retrofitted to reduce hazards and mitigate other existing unsafe conditions. Policy EH 1.2.1: Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code. Goal EH 3: Ensure the safety of the City's businesses and residents from methane hazards. Objective EH 3.2: Minimize methane hazards in the identified Methane Overlay District, and other areas outside the Methane Overlay Districts as may later be defined, through the regulation of construction and adherence to the City's Methane Hazard Mitigation Plan. Policy EH 3.2.2: Establish, enforce, and periodically update testing requirements for sites proposed for new construction within the identified Methane Overlay District. The environmental analysis analyzes the existing physical setting of the project site as it relates to hazards and hazardous materials and its potential impact on human health resulting from the implementation of the proposed project. BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 PC Staff Report—03/27/12 5 (12sr14 EIR 10-00° "-n„-1A HB -479- Item 10. - 36 through MM4.6-3 would require that the Phase II recommendations be implemented to ensure that all impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. To ensure that the proposed project is designed to minimize damage resulting from seismic hazards and that new structures are engineered to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measure MM4.5-1 would be implemented requiring a final soils and geotechnical report, which would recommend design measures to be implemented in the final project design. D. Environmental Resources/Conservation Element Policy ERC 2.1.10: Conduct construction activities to minimize adverse impacts on existing wildlife resources. Mitigation Measure MM4.3-1 requires that prior to construction or any vegetation removal that appropriate surveys shall be conducted to ensure that no nesting habitats are disturbed, including impact-avoidance measures. E. Growth Management Element Goal GM 1: Provide adequate police services to meet the needs of the City's population. Goal GM 1.1.3: Continue to provide a 5-minute response time for Priority 1 calls for service at least 85% of the time. Calls are considered Priority 1 where there is a threat to life or property. Goal GM2: Provide adequate fire and paramedic services to meet the needs of the City's population. Policy GM 2.1.2: Provide a 5-minute response time for emergency fire services at least 80 percent of the time. Policy GM 2.1.3: Provide a 5-minute response time for paramedic services at least 80 percent of the time. The environmental analysis evaluates the effects of the proposed project on public services (fire, police, schools and libraries) by identifying anticipated demands on existing and planned service availability. The analysis concludes that the proposed project would not require new or physically altered fire or police facilities to maintain adequate response times and staffing. However, in order to ensure that an adequate level of service is provided through the build-out of the specific plan, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measure MM4.11-1 is recommended, which would ensure that funding is available to maintain acceptable response times and staffing levels for Police and Fire. Policy GM 1.1.7: Ensure that new development site design incorporates measures to maximize policing safety and security. Policy GM 2.1.4: Ensure that new development site design incorporates measures to maximize fire safety and prevention. ort—03/27/12 +S (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 37 HB -480- The provisions of the BECSP require Fire Department review and approval of the proposed project to ensure that adequate circulation is provided to enable emergency access to the site and meet Fire code standards for circulation aisle widths. BECSP Program FIR Mitigation Measure MM4.6-4 would require adequate access for emergency vehicles during project construction. In addition, the Site Plan Review process would involve review by other City departments, including the Police and Fire Departments. F. Hazardous Materials Element Goal HM 1: Reduce, to the greatest degree possible, the potential for harm to life, property, and the environment from hazardous materials and hazardous waste. Objective HM 1.1: Promote the proper handling, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous waste. BECSP Program FIR Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.6-2 ensure remediation of contaminated soils containing hazardous materials, if any, prior to development of the proposed project and by providing supplemental procedures in the event of unanticipated discoveries of contaminants during construction. If contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk posed to human health. G. Historic and Cultural Resources Element Objective HCR 1.1: Ensure that all of the City's historically and archaeologically significant resources are identified and protected. The impact analysis for cultural resources is based on the findings of the cultural records search and site survey conducted for the proposed project. No evidence of previously undiscovered archeological resources on the project site was encountered during the survey and record search. Although no cultural resources have been recorded on the project site, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.4-2 (a) and MM4.4-2 (b) would ensure that impacts from the discovery of resources during project construction would be less than significant. H. Housing Element Goal H 2: Provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs. Goal H 3: Assist in development of affordable housing. The FIR includes an assessment of the proposed project's consistency with the SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The project site is currently designated for up to 175 affordable housing units to fulfill the City's affordable housing needs as determined by SCAG population projections. Since the proposed project would not include any residential development and potential replacement housing sites are uncertain at this time, there could be a loss of potential affordable housing units. The FIR states that the proposed project would PC Staff Report—03/27/12 7 (12sr14 EIR.10-00" HB -481- Item 10. - 38 not be consistent with the goals of providing and assisting in the development of affordable housing to accommodate regional housing needs. The EIR determined that implementation of the proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts in this regard. I. Land Use Element Goal L U 2: Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. Objective LU 2.1: Review development with the ability of the City and other service providers to provide adequate public infrastructure (transportation facilities, wastewater collection and treatment, water supply, electrical, natural gas, telecommunications, solid waste disposal, storm drainage) and quality public services (governmental, police, fire, recreational, cultural, and public education system). Goal L U 4: Achieve and maintain high quality architecture, landscape, and public open spaces in the City. Policy LU 7.1.5: Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The environmental analysis states that the project site would be served by all necessary utilities, with the exception of storm drains, and located near the OCTA transportation center. The environmental analysis discusses that the project would be required to contain all additional stormwater volume on- site using a subterranean retention system per the Orange County stormwater permit requirements. As a result, storm drain infrastructure is not needed for the proposed project. All other public utilities and services would be adequate to serve the project given the relatively low intensity and nature of the skate park and retail use. Through conformance to the BECSP Development Code, the EIR states that the project would be designed to provide high quality architectural features and landscaping to be visually active and consistent with surrounding development. The EIR indicates that the proposed project would provide a recreational facility and retail use, which would provide additional tax revenue within the City and would not adversely affect the integrity of any sensitive environmental resources. J. Noise Element Goal N 1: Ensure that all necessary and appropriate actions are taken to protect Huntington Beach residents, employees, visitors, and noise sensitive uses from the adverse impacts created by excessive noise levels from stationary and ambient sources. Objective N 1.2: Prevent and mitigate the adverse impacts of excessive noise exposure on the residents, employees, visitors, and noise sensitive uses of Huntington Beach. The EIR includes a noise analysis consistent with CEQA requirements. The EIR concludes that the proposed project would have a minimal effect on the existing noise environment within and adjacent to the project site during normal skate park and retail operations. However, the EIR states that the W1 Q+-frrpo7ort-03/27/12 8 (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 39 HB -482- proposed project would have adverse impacts to noise-sensitive residential uses during periodic special events due to the use of generators, public address system, and noise generated by attendants of these events. Project Mitigation Measure MM 41-1 would be required to attenuate noise from generators for special events. The EIR determined that the special event-related noise impacts would be significant and unavoidable with the implementation of the proposed project. Objective N 1.6: Minimize the impacts of construction noise on adjacent uses. Policy N 1.6.1: Ensure that construction activities be regulated to establish hours of operation, to prevent and/or mitigate the generation of excessive or adverse noise impacts through the implementation of the existing Noise Ordinance and/or any future revisions to the Noise Ordinance. Under the City's Municipal Code, construction activities can only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM from Monday through Saturday. BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.9-1 through 4.9-3 would further restrict construction hours for the highest noise producing activities and ensure that impacts associated with construction activities are minimized to the maximum extent feasible. As such, impacts would be less than significant. K. Public Facilities and Services Element Objective PF 1.1: Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime. Policy PF 1.3.2: Ensure that new development and land use proposals are analyzed to determine the impact on their operators, occupants, visitors, or customers may have on the safety and welfare of the community. PolicyPF F 2.3.1: Continue to require all structures to follow all State and nationally recognized fire codes. The environmental analysis includes an analysis of impacts to police and fire facilities and services. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly impact the level of service delivery for the project area and would not require any new or physically altered police and fire facilities to maintain adequate response times and staffing. However, in order to ensure that an adequate level of service is provided through the build-out of the specific plan area, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measure MM 4.11-1 is recommending that the City provide sufficient funding to maintain the City's standard and average level of service through the use of General Fund monies. Compliance with the regulations of the California Fire Code pertaining to fire protection systems and equipment, general safety precautions, and many other general and specialized fire-safety requirements for new and existing structures reduce potential impacts. Policy PF 4.2.3: Ensure that development shall not occur without providing for adequate school facilities. The environmental analysis includes an analysis of potential impacts to schools. The proposed project would not result in direct population growth but could result in indirect impacts due to some job PC Staff Report—03/27/12 9 (12sr14 EIR 10-00^ "- HB -483- Item 10. - 40 creation. With the implementation of Code Requirements CR4.11-1, 4.11-2 and 4.11-3, fees collected would offset any additional increase in educational demand at the elementary school, middle school, and high school levels serving the proposed project. L. Recreation and Community Services Element Goal RCS 1: Enrich the quality of life for all citizens of Huntington Beach by providing constructive and creative leisure opportunities. The environmental analysis fords that the proposed project would provide new recreational opportunities for the community, drawing residents to the new skate park. In addition, the project's compliance with Chapter 230 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for payment of park fees would ensure that the project would not have significant impacts on existing recreational facilities and opportunities. M. Urban Design Element Goal UD L Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach. Objective UD 1.3: Strengthen the visual character of the City's street hierarchy in order to clarify the City's structure and improve Citywide identity. Policy UD 1.1.3: Require a consistent design theme and/or landscape design character along the community's corridors that reflects the unique qualities of each district. Ensure that streetscape standards for the major commercial corridors, the residential corridors, and primary and secondary image corridors provide each corridor with its own identity while promoting visual continuity throughout the City. The EIR provides a description of the existing site conditions and analyzes the extent to which the visual character of the project site would change and additional sources of light and glare as a result of the proposed project would occur. The EIR states that the project's compliance with the standards and guidelines of the BECSP would enhance the visual character and quality of the surrounding area and transform the character of the site to that envisioned by the Town Center Neighborhood designation. The EIR indicates that adherence to the requirements of the lighting types and roof colors in the BECSP would ensure that the project would not affect the daytime and nighttime views of the area. Consistent with the BECSP Program EIR, Mitigation Measure MM4.1-2 is recommended to require that the project maximize use of non-reflective facade treatments. N. Utilities Element Objective U 1.2: Ensure that existing and new development does not degrade the City's surface waters and groundwater basins. Policy U 1.2.1: Require that existing and new developments contain safeguards and mitigation measures preventing degradation. Dd- Q,-.rrD--)ort-03/27/12 10 (12sr14EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 41 HB -484- The EIR includes an analysis of the project's impacts on hydrology and water quality. The analysis is based on the analysis included in the BECSP Program EIR and site-specific conditions. Code Requirement CR4.7-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.7-1 and MM4.7-2 would ensure that the proposed project would not adversely affect groundwater supplies or groundwater hydrology. Implementation of Code Requirement CR4.5-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.5-1 would ensure that impacts to on-site erosion would remain less than significant. Additionally, Code Requirement CR4.7-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.7-3 and MM4.74 requiring that a precise grading and drainage plan as well as hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared to ensure that the specific geologic and hydrologic conditions of the project site are reflected in the final project design to mitigate hydrology and water quality impacts to a less than significant level. Policy U 1.1.1: Monitor the demands on the water system, manage the development to mitigate impacts and/or facilitate improvements to the water supply and distribution system, and maintain and expand water supply and distribution facilities. Objective U 1.3: Minimize water consumption rates through site design, use of efficient systems, and other techniques. Policy U 1.3.2: Continue to require the incorporation of water conservation features in the design of all new and existing uses such as the use of native plants, low flow toilets and water efficient appliances. Objective U 1.4: Ensure the costs of improvements to the water supply, transmission, distribution, storage and treatment systems are borne by those who benefit. Polio U 1.4.1: Require the cost of improvements to the existing water supply and distribution facilities necessitated by the new development be borne by the new development benefiting from the improvements, either through the payment of fees, or the actual construction of the improvements in accordance with State Nexus Legislation. The environmental analysis states that the proposed project represents a relatively low-intensity development in terms of water demand. Implementation of the Code Requirement CR4.14-2 requiring compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measure MM4.14-1 requiring additional water conservation practices would ensure that the project's impact on water supplies would be less than significant. Policy U 1.2.2: Require new developments to connect to the sewer system. Policy U 2.1.5: Maintain, upgrade, and expand existing wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Objective U.2.2: Ensure the costs of wastewater infrastructure improvements are borne by those that benefit. Policy U.2.2.1: Require the costs of improvements to the existing wastewater collection facilities, which are necessitated by new development, to be borne by the new development benefiting from the PC Staff Report—03/27/12 1 1 (12sr14 EIR 10-00r _. — IIB -485- Item 10. - 42 improvements; either through the payment of fees, or by the actual construction of the improvements in accordance with State Nexus Legislation. The environmental analysis states that the project site would require the extension of water and wastewater infrastructure to serve the proposed skate park and retail use since it is not currently served by public utilities. The EIR discloses that local sewer service would be provided by the Midway City Sanitary District (MCSD). A new lateral connection would be constructed in McFadden Avenue approximately 10 feet north of the project site boundary. On-site improvements would be constructed and maintained by the project applicant, while off-site improvements would be implemented, as necessary, by the respective public agencies and/or utilities. Objective U 3.3: Ensure that storm drain facilities (charnels and outputs) do not generate significant adverse impacts on the environment in which the facilities traverse or empty. The environmental analysis indicates the project site is not currently served by public storm drains, as currently stormwater flows are conveyed downstream via sheet flow(onsite) and curb and gutter (off- site)to City storm drain facilities. The project would involve the construction of an on-site stormdrain retention system to post-project stormwater flows below pre-project volumes, as required by County standards. The environmental analysis states that the construction of the stormwater system would be limited to the project site and would not result in significant environmental effects and potential impacts would be less than significant. Zoning Compliance: Not applicable. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: Not applicable. Environmental Status: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), EIR No. 10-009 was prepared by PCR Services to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project as well as identify appropriate mitigation measures. The Draft EIR was distributed to the Planning Commission for review at the start of the 45-day public comment period on January 13, 2012. The Final Draft EIR, including the Response to Comments and all text changes as a result of the public comment period was distributed to the Planning Commission and posted on the City's website on March 14, 2012. The required CEQA procedure that was followed is outlined below: October 2011 Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be required. October 27, 2011 A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare an EIR. October 27, 2011 to November Initial Study/Notice of Preparation available for 30 day public review 30, 2011 and comment period. port-11/27/12 11) (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 43 HB -486- November 9, 2011 A Public Scoping Meeting was held to solicit comments and issue areas to be studied in the EIR. January 13, 2012 A Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse. January 13, 2012 to February 27, Draft EIR available for public review and comment for 45 days. 2012 February 8, 2012 A Public Comment Meeting was held to solicit comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR. Tentative March 27, 2012 Public hearing is scheduled before Planning Commission to Certify EIR No. 10-009. Through the use of appropriate code requirements and/or mitigation measures indentified in the EIR, most of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. However, there are two project-specific significant adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. The significant adverse environmental impacts are as follows: ® Land Use Planning > Project Specific—The proposed project would result in conflicts with the SCAG RHNA for 2006-2014 and the applicable goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. ■ Noise > Project Specific—The proposed project would result in temporary noise increases associated with periodic special events on-site, during which noise levels would exceed established thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors. The scope and conceptual design of the Skate Park Project was provided by the applicant for purposes of the EIR analysis. The Skate Park Project would require approval of a Site Plan Review application, although the City does not have a pending application for construction of the proposed Skate Park Project. Notwithstanding the adoption and implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, approval of the project would require that a Statement of Overriding Considerations be adopted finding that the economic and social benefits of the project outweigh its potentially adverse environmental impacts. Prior to certification and adoption of the EIR by resolution, the Planning Commission may amend the document. It should be noted, that removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures will require findings and justification. Environmental Board: The City's Environmental Board reviewed the EIR and provided a comment letter during the DER process. In summary, the Environmental Board stated concerns regarding water run-off impacts,,noise and lighting impacts, and the work on high voltage power lines nearby. The Board provided suggestions for project design related to landscaping in the use of specific trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The Board also encouraged the use of sustainable development practices to increase the project's energy efficiency. PC Staff Report—03/27/12 (12sr14 EIR 10-00" ' HB -487- Item 10. - 44 Coastal Status: Not applicable Redevelopment Status: The project site is within a redevelopment project area. The City's Economic Development Department has reviewed the EIR to ensure that requirements applicable in the redevelopment area were included in the analysis. Design Review Board: Not applicable Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The EIR was circulated to other Departments for review and comment. All Department comments and recommendations are incorporated into the EIR and its mitigation measures. Compliance with mitigation measures will be enforced through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Refer to Resolution No. 1660 Exhibit A). Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on March 15, 2012, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 1,000 ft. radius of the project site, interested parties, and individuals/organizations that commented on the environmental document. As of March 16, 2012, no communications on the draft EIR, other than letters included in the Final EIR/Response to Comments,have been received. Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(Sl: ® Draft EIR: October 27, 2011 • Within 1 year of complete application: October 27, 2012 ANALYSIS: The analysis provides an overview of the EIR and its conclusions, a review of the project alternatives, and a summary of the response to comments. EIR Overview The EIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decision makers. This EIR identifies significant or potentially significant environmental effects, as well as ways in which those impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, whether through the imposition of code requirements (CRs), mitigation measures (MMs), or through the implementation of alternatives to the project. In a practical sense, EIRs function as a technique for fact-finding, allowing future applicants, concerned citizens, and staff an part-13/27/12 1 d (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 45 HB -488- opportunity to collectively review and evaluate baseline conditions and project impacts through a process of full disclosure. Scope of EIR Analysis As the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-009 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR, the environmental impacts for certain issue areas of the project are substantially consistent with the analysis in the BECSP Program EIR and did not require substantial additional analysis. Based on a preliminary environmental analysis and a review of the BECSP Program EIR, the following issue areas did not require substantial additional analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-009: ■ Biological Resources ■ Cultural Resources ■ Geology/ Soils ■ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ■ Public Services ■ Recreation ■ Utilities/ Service Systems Conversely, the following issue areas were determined to require additional project-specific analysis: ■ Aesthetics ■ Air Quality ■ Climate Change ■ Hydrology/Water Quality e Land Use/Planning ■ Noise ■ Transportation/Traffic No impacts to Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources, and Population/Housing were determined; as such,no analysis is provided in the draft EIR. A summary of key issues and mitigation measures resulting from the EIR is provided below. A complete listing of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation Monitoring Program provided in Attachment No. 1. o Aesthetics Implementation of the project will change the visual character of the project site and add additional sources of light and glare. The proposed project would be developed in accordance with the standards and guidelines of the Town Center Neighborhood designation, which would ensure that the intent of the BECSP is carried out through proper site planning and high-quality materials, architecture and landscaping. The EIR acknowledges that the project is proposed in an existing urban environment in which building glare and a significant amount of ambient nighttime lighting already exists. The provisions of the BECSP include regulations and guidelines to ensure that project lighting and exterior building materials would not result in significant impacts from light and glare. A mitigation measure is PC Staff Report—03/27/12 1 c (12sr14 EIR 10-00- — HB -489- Item 10. - 46 recommended to require that the project maximize use of non-reflective fagade treatments. Therefore impacts would be less than significant. s Air Quality The EIR analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to implementation of the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would result from construction activities, operation of uses allowed under the proposed Specific Plan, and project-related traffic volumes. Air quality modeling was completed consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District recommendations. The EIR analyzed the following emissions: Carbon Monoxide (CO), Respirable Particulate Matter (PM10) and Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Oxides (SOx), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). In addition, the EIR examined if localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections would be increased beyond state and national standards as a result of vehicle traffic. Construction Emissions-Short Term Impacts: Construction activities conducted as part of the implementation of the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD localized significance thresholds and therefore short-term air quality impacts would be less than significant. Although project-related construction air quality impacts would be less than significant, BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM 4.2-1 through MM 4.2-14 would be implemented to reduce construction and air quality impacts associated with the proposed project. Operational Emissions-Long Term Impacts: Operational emissions generated by both stationary and mobile sources would result from normal day-to-day activities after completion of project construction. The analysis of the daily operational emissions from the proposed project has been prepared utilizing the CaIEEMod computer model recommended by the SCAQMD. The proposed project would not generate emissions that exceed the thresholds of significance recommended by the SCAQMD and therefore long- term air quality impacts would be less than significant. The EIR examined if localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections would be increased beyond state and national standards as a result of increased vehicle traffic. The EIR analysis determined that the proposed project will not cause localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections to exceed national or state ambient air quality standards. Therefore, "hot spots" are not anticipated to occur at local intersections as a result of project implementation. s Climate Change Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions associated with the proposed project would result from operation of future project development and from future project-related traffic volumes. Construction activities would also generate emissions within the project site and on roadways resulting from construction-related traffic. BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.15-1 to MM4.15-9 are consistent with strategies recommended by the California Climate Action Team and California Air Pollution Control Officers Association for reducing climate change emissions, which would ensure that construction and operational impacts from the project remain less than significant with respect to climate change. port—03/27/12 1 A (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 47 HB -490- ♦ Hydrology and Water Quality The EIR utilized information from the BECSP Program EIR as well as site-specific characteristics and a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project to analyze potential hydrology and water quality impacts. The subject property is relatively flat and gently slopes in a southerly direction. The typography drops approximately four feet from the northerly boundary along McFadden Avenue to the southerly boundary along Center Avenue. The proposed project will require the preparation of a final WQMP prior to the issuance of Precise Grading or Building permits. Pursuant to the BECSP, the project must include site design and source and treatment control BMPs in the project WQMP. Code Requirement CR4.7-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.7-1 and MM4.7-2 would ensure that the proposed project would not adversely affect groundwater supplies or groundwater hydrology. Implementation of Code Requirement CR4.5-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.5-1 would ensure that impacts to on-site erosion would remain less than significant. Additionally, Code Requirement CR4.7-1 and BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.7-3 and MM4.74 requiring that a precise grading and drainage plan as well as hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared to ensure that the specific geologic and hydrologic conditions of the project site are reflected in the final project design to mitigate hydrology and water quality impacts to a less than significant level. ♦ Land Use and Planning This section of the EIR analyzes the potential for the project to conflict with any applicable adopted land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project, including the General Plan. The proposed project would develop a skate park and retail use on a currently vacant parcel that is designated in the General Plan for up to 175 affordable housing units to fulfill the City's affordable housing needs as determined by SCAG population projections in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment. Since the proposed project would not include any residential development and potential replacement housing sites are uncertain at this time, there could be a loss of potential affordable housing units. The EIR determined that implementation of the proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to conflict with the SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment and the General Plan. ® Noise Potential noise impacts associated with short-term construction activities and long-term changes in ambient conditions primarily related to increases in traffic were analyzed in the EIR. Ambient noise level measurements at three locations near the project site and roadway noise levels from the BECSP Program EIR were utilized to provide the baseline noise conditions. Noise that would be experienced by sensitive uses due to development associated with implementation of the proposed project is determined at their property lines. The nearest sensitive uses were identified at 35 feet (property line of the nearest multi- family residential uses), 150 feet (northwest corner of McFadden Avenue and Vermont Street), and 200 feet (along Gothard Street across the project site) from the project site. In terms of the short-term noise impacts from construction, the City's noise ordinance exempts noise associated with construction provided the construction takes place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. Implementation of BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.9-1 though MM4.9-3 would ensure that impacts associated with construction-related noise would be minimized. Therefore,this impact would be less than significant. PC Staff Report—03/27/12 " (12sr14 EIR 10-00- - - HB -491- Item 10. - 48 Construction-related groundborne noise and vibration may result in human annoyance and/or potentially damage the foundations and exteriors of other structures. Implementation of BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.9-1 through 1,, M4.9-3 would help to reduce this impact to a less than significant level. In addition, operation of the project would not result in excessive groundborne noise and vibration and impacts would be less than significant. Long term noise generated by implementation of the proposed project would include new noise sources such as mechanical equipment, refuse collection area, parking area, and skate park activities. The proposed project would have a minimal effect on the existing noise environment within and adjacent to the project site during normal skate park and retail operations. However, the proposed project would have adverse impacts to noise-sensitive residential uses during periodic special events due to the use of generators, public address (PA) system, and noise generated by attendants of these events. The proposed project would host up to 15 event days throughout the year. Twelve event days would be held on weekends and are expected to draw 300 to 500 spectators per event day. The remaining three event days would consist of one major event which is expected to draw up to 2,500 spectators per event day, starting on a Friday and ending on a Sunday. Noise levels generated by the PA system, audience applause and cheers during these special events would exceed the significance threshold of 55 dBA at the nearest multi- family residential uses approximately 50 feet from the temporary grandstand seating at a turf area. There are no mitigation measures that can fully mitigate the noise associated with the special events. However, Project Mitigation Measure MM4.F-1 would be able to attenuate the noise from the generators for special events. The EIR determined that the special event-related noise impacts would be significant and unavoidable at the nearest noise receptor (multi-family residential uses) for all 15 event days with the implementation of the proposed project. o Transportation/Traffic The EIR analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on existing transportation and traffic conditions resulting from implementation of the proposed project. A traffic study was conducted by Austin-Foust Associates and analyzed potential adverse traffic impacts on I intersections surrounding the project site with one in the City of Westminster and the remainder in the City of Huntington Beach. For construction traffic impacts, truck trips due to construction activities at the project site would not cause a substantial increase to traffic volumes and delays in the project site and therefore traffic impacts would be less than significant. As for project trip generation, the proposed project would generate 416 daily weekday trips at build out and would not result in significant impacts when compared to the scope of development for the project site in the General Plan. The project may contribute traffic to other intersections and freeway ramps that were determined to be significantly impacted as a result of implementation of the BECSP. However, the proposed project's impacts on those intersections and freeway ramps determined to be deficient can be mitigated through BECSP Program EIR Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-18 requiring payment of fees that would contribute the project's fair share to improving those intersections. The traffic study also analyzed the traffic impacts for major special events, which are expected to draw up to 2,500 spectators per event day. A weekend survey was performed for four intersections, chosen because of the weekend activity that occurs near the proposed project such as the Goldenwest swap meet, Westminster mall activity, and Bella Terra mall activity. All intersections are forecasted to operate at level of service D or better, resulting in less than significant traffic impacts during special events. In Item 10. - 49 port—"/27/12 HB _492_1 Q (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) addition, a qualitative analysis was conducted to identify the potential impact of the proposed shuttle route from the Huntington Beach Sports Complex where visitors would be directed to park their vehicles during special events and be shuttled to/from the project site by buses. The estimated 100 trips per day would have a less than significant impact for intersections located along the shuttle route. The EIR also analyzes the project's capacity to accommodate parking for both the day-to-day operations and the special events. The proposed project would include a main parking lot with approximately 26 spaces and a secondary parking lot with approximately 40 spaces. Based on the nature of the skate park/retail store and associated users/patrons, it is expected that the majority of park visitors would be youth utilizing non-vehicular transportation or dropped off by others. As such, the parking supply provided in the main parking lot is anticipated to adequately meet the normal day-to-day demands. However, the facility would host several special events per year, which would substantially increase park visitation and associated traffic and parking. A significant number of guests are expected to be local youth arriving at the park by foot or other non-vehicular forms of transportation. Guests arriving by vehicle would be directed to the surface parking lots at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex, located approximately 2.8 miles south of the project site, which has a total of 850 parking spaces. Guests would be transported to and from the skate park via shuttle buses. Prior to scheduling events, the project operator would coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Community Services Department to allocate appropriate parking stall reserves at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex. To ensure adequacy of parking, the project operator would schedule major events on days where no events are planned at the Sports Complex. While adequate parking for special events is anticipated to be provided at off-site locations, special events have the potential to create parking impacts for adjacent neighbors. Implementation of Project Mitigation Measure MM4.G-1 addressing the potential for overflow parking for special events would ensure the potentially significant parking impacts to neighboring uses during special events are reduced to a less than significant level. With implementation of existing code requirements, mitigation measures adopted for the BECSP and proposed project-specific mitigation measures, all project-related traffic impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Alternatives to the Proposed Project CEQA guidelines require that an EIR describe a range of reasonable Alternatives to the project or the location of the project that could meet the objectives of the project and potentially reduce significant impacts of the project. Of note is that every conceivable Alternative scenario is not required but rather a range of feasible Alternatives must be included in the EIR so that the project can be adequately evaluated. Therefore, the rationale for selecting potentially feasible Alternatives includes a different type of project, modification to the proposed project, or suitable Alternative project sites. The Alternatives are evaluated to see how well they can achieve the project objectives. Three Alternatives were evaluated in the Draft EIR and described below: No Project/No Development Alternative — The "no project" alternative would serve as a "no development" alternative with the site remaining in its vacant, undeveloped state. Reduced Project Alternative — This alternative assumes a reduced intensity of the project elements at the same project site. Under the reduced project alternative, approximately 8,000 sq. PC Staff Report—03/27/12 HB n493- (12sr14 EIR 10-00 Ite111 10. - 50 ft. of skate plaza area, a 2,000 sq. ft. skate shop/concession/restroom building, 15,000 sq. ft. of turf/walking area, a 480 sq. ft. skate park restroom structure, and 200 sq. ft. skate park entrance kiosk would be developed. Alternative Location Alternative — This alternative assumes the proposed project would be developed at the same intensity but at another location in the City. The proposed skate park and retail/concession use would be constructed and operated on County-owned property at the former Gothard Landfill site, located at 18131 Gothard Street on the west side of Gothard Street and south of Talbert Avenue. The project would be built on a 3.5-acre portion of the approximately 11.5- acre property along the eastern side of the site fronting Gothard Street. The alternative site would include all improvements contemplated as part of the propose project, including onsite parking and additional space for special event parking and turf/vendor areas. Specifically, the northern half of the site would be developed with an above-grade skate bowl area, a 15,000 sq. ft. above- grade skate plaza area, a 4,000 sq. ft. retail/concession use and restroom structure, a turf area surrounding the skate plaza, and onsite surface parking lot with 40 parking spaces. The southern half of the alternate site would remain undeveloped to provide space for special event parking. Primary vehicle access would be provided by a driveway at the northeastern corner of the site on Gothard Street, while a secondary access would be located at the southeast corner of the property and would only be used during special events. As the site is currently designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan and zoned for open space/recreation, amendments to the City's General Plan and Zoning Code would be required under this Alternative. Since the site is a former landfill, various structures housing equipment to capture landfill gases are located throughout the site and would remain on-site under this Alternative to address landfill gas-related hazards. No Project/No Development Alternative Impacts Under this alternative, the skate park project would not be constructed and the project site would remain in its vacant, undeveloped state. The No Project/No Development Alternative would result in reduced impacts with regard to all environmental issues except for aesthetics (operational visual quality) and hydrology and water quality (operational water quality), which would be greater than the proposed project, and would avoid significant and unavoidable land use and noise impacts that would occur under the proposed project. The No Project/No Development Alternative would fail to meet any of the project's goals and objectives, either partially for fully. Reduced Proiect Alternative Impacts Similar to the proposed project, the majority of impacts associated with the Reduced Project Alternative would be less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures and code requirements. It should be noted that most impacts would be less than the proposed project due to the reduction in the scope of development in the areas of aesthetics, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions), hydrology and water quality, noise (construction and operational noise and vibration), and transportation/traffic (intersection LOS, CMP impacts, access/circulation, alternative transportation plan consistency). This Alternative would result in similar impacts regarding greenhouse gas emissions (GHG plan consistency), land use (plan consistency), and transportation/traffic (parking). Similar to the proposed project, significant and unavoidable land use and planning and noise impacts would occur since the reduced project would conflict with the SCAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment and the General Plan and the periodic noise increases associated with special events would result in noise levels in excess of established thresholds. The Reduced Project Alternative would partially meet many of the project's - --- )ort—03/27/12 ?0 (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) Item 10. - 51 HB -494- goals and objectives, but would not achieve all goals and objectives to the extent the project would. The significant adverse impacts are as follows: ® Land Use Planning > Proiect Specific—The proposed project would result in conflicts with the SCAG RHNA for 2006-2014 and the applicable goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. ® Noise > Proiect Specific—The proposed project would result in temporary noise increases associated with periodic special events on-site, during which noise levels would exceed established thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors. Alternative Location Alternative Under this Alternative, similar impacts would result in the areas of aesthetics, air quality (AQMP consistency, construction emissions, and operational emissions), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions and GHG plan consistency), hydrology and water quality (hydrology, drainage, and water quality), land use (plan consistency), noise (violation of noise standards, groundboume vibration, and permanent noise increases), and transportation/traffic (intersection LOS, access/circulation, alternative transportation). This Alternative would result in less impacts regarding air quality (exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations and odors), noise (temporary and periodic noise increases), and transportation/traffic (parking). The Draft EIR identifies that the Alternative Location Alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative to the proposed project because it would eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts related to noise and land use/planning and would meet all the project objectives. However, potential impacts related to biological resources, geology and soils, and hazards and hazardous materials would occur under this Alternative that would not occur at the project site. In terms of biological resources, the former landfill property is known to contain coastal sage scrub habitat, which is considered a sensitive biological resource that supports rare, threatened, and/or endangered wildlife species. In terms of geology and soils and hazards and hazardous materials, the presence of landfill waste materials and associated landfill gases in on-site soils would result in greater impacts in these areas. It is anticipated that a biological resources assessment and project specific geotechnical study would be required under this Alternative to identify potential impacts and mitigation measures to reduce impacts. Statement of Overriding Considerations Environmental impacts associated with implementation of a project may not always be mitigated to a level considered less than significant. In such cases, a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) must be prepared prior to approval of a project, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093. Because implementation of the proposed project would create significant unavoidable impacts as described above in the areas of Land Use/Planning and Noise, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required to describe the specific reasons for approving the project based on information contained within the Final EIR, as well as any other information in the public record. The Planning Commission and City Council will be required to adopt a SOC prior to action on the GPA and ZTA. PC Staff Report—03/27/12 11 (12sr14 EIR 10-001 _. HB -495- Item 10. - 52 Public Comments on the Draft EIR and Errata Changes During the public review period, the City of Huntington Beach received a total of four comment letters: one from a state agency, one from a local agency, one from the Environmental Board, and one from an individual. Five verbal comments were received at the public meeting held during the comment period. In response to the comments received, the final EIR includes text changes for the purpose of clarification or correction. The Errata do not change the conclusions of the EIR analysis. All of the other comments are adequately addressed in the Response to Comments. Any written communication received subsequent to the preparation of this staff report will be forwarded to the Planning Commission under separate cover. SUMMARY: Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009 serves as an informational document with the sole purpose of identifying potential environmental impacts associated with the Skate Park Project, alternatives that minimize those impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify EIR No. 10-009 because: ® The EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; ■ The EIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and ® The EIR identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the BECSP Program EIR and General Plan policies. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1660—Certifying Final EIR No. 10-009 2. Fina4 EIR No. 10 009, ineittdos Draft EIR, EIR Appendiees, Response To Comments and Tex Changes (Not Attached Available &F -Public Review at the Planning and Zoning Counter--3!d SH:MBB:HF:TN Item 10. - 53,orf—03/27/12 I113 -496- (12sr14 EIR 10-009 Skate Park) RESOLUTION NO. 1660 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COIV MSSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE DIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EMPACT REPORT(SCH442011101064) FOR THE SKATE PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009, State Clearinghouse # 2011101064 ("EIR") was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach ("City") to address the environmental implications of the proposed Skate Park Project(the"Project"); and ® On October 27,2011, a Notice of Preparation/Initial Study for the Project was distributed to the State Clearinghouse, other responsible agencies, trustee agencies and interested parties; and + After obtaining comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation, and comments received at the public scoping meeting held on November 9, 2011, the City completed preparation of the Draft EIR and filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse on January 13,2012; and ® The Draft EIR was circulated for public review and comment from January 13, 2012 to February 27, 2012, and was available for review at several locations including City Hall Planning and Building Department, City Clerk's Office, Central Library and the City's website; and WHEREAS, Public comments have been received on the Draft EIR, and responses to those comments have been prepared and provided to the Planning Commission as a section within a separately bound document entitled "Center Avenue Skate Park Project Environmental Impact Report Volume III: Final EIR" (the"Responses to Comments"), dated March 2012; and WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the Environmental Impact Report, and the Response •to Comments included in the Final Environmental Impact Report satisfies this provision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on the EIR on March 27, 2012 and received and considered public testimony. NOW,THEREFORE,the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, the Final EIR for the Project is comprised of the Draft EIR and Appendices,the comments received on the Draft EIR, the Responses to Comments (including a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR), the Text Changes to the Draft EIR (bound together with the Responses to Comments) and all Planning and Building Department Staff Reports to the HB -497- Item 10. - 54 Planning Commission, including all minutes,transcripts, attachments and references. All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Building, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, California 92648. SECTION 2. The Planning Commission fords and certifies that the Final EIR is complete and adequate in that it has identified all significant environmental effects of the Project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission finds that all significant effects of the Project are set forth in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The Planning Commission finds that although the Final EIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the Project is approved, all significant effects which can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been mitigated or avoided by the incorporation of Project design features, standard conditions and requirements, and by the imposition of mitigation measures on the approved Project. All mitigation measures are included in the "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist" (also referred to as the "Mitigation Monitoring Program") attached as Exhibit"A"to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 5. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR has described reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the Project (including the "No Project" Alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives. Further, the Planning Commission finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR and that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on the Project. SECTION 6. The Planning Commission finds that no "substantial evidence" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15384) has been presented that would call into question the facts and conclusions in the EIR. SECTION 7. The Planning Commission finds that no "significant new information" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5)has been added to the Final EIR after circulation of the Draft EIR. The Planning Commission finds that the minor refinements that have been made in the Project as a result of clarifications in the mitigation measures and EIR text do not amount to significant new information concerning the Project, nor has any significant new information concerning the Project become known to the Planning Commission through the public hearings held on the Project, or through the comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments. SECTION 8. The Planning Commission finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program establishes a mechanism and procedures for implementing and verifying the mitigations pursuant to Public Resources Code 2108.6 and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the Project prior to or concurrent with Project implementation as defined in each mitigation measure. Item 10. - 55 HB -498- SECTION 9. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR reflects the independent review and judgment of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission, that the Final EIR was presented to the Planning Commission, and that the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and 7onijig Text Amendment No. 11-002. SECTION 10. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. The Planning Commission certifies that the Final EIR prepared for the Project is complete, and that it has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA ('guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the Twenty Seventh day of March,2012. AYES: Shier Burnett,Peterson,Delgleize,Ryan NOES: Bixby, Mantini ABSENT: Farley ABSTAIN: None ATTEST- Scott ess, Se retary Chairperson,Planning Commission Exhibit A:Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program HB -499- Item 10. - 56 ATTACHMENT #5 1, City of Huntington Beach Planning'and Buildi D,---r- sae"t STAFF REPORT HUMINGTON BEACH - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building BY: Tess Nguyen,Associate Planner . BATE: March 27, 2012 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 / ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 (SKATE PARK PROJECT) APPLICANT: VF Outdoor, Inc., 6550 Katella Avenue, Cypress, CA 90630 PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 7461 Center Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: e General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 request: — Amend the Housing Element: 1) to remove the reference to the project site on Page IV-16; 2) to remove Site 45 from Table IV-7 (Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use) on Page IV-17; and 3)to remove the discussion of Site#5 on Page IV-18. ® Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 request: - Amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property. © Staff s Recommendation: Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 based upon the following: — Facilitates the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community. — Improves the City's fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events. — Complements a diversity of uses within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan area, particularly along the Center Avenue corridor. — Demonstrates that the City has adequate sites to fulfill Housing Element goals HB -501- EItem 10. - 58 RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 by approving the draft City Council Resolution (Attachment No. 1) and forward to the City Council for adoption." B. "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for approval (Attachment No. 2) and forward the draft ordinance(Attachment No. 3) to the City Council for adoption." C. "Approve CEQA Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations — EIR No. 10-009 (Attachment No. 7)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Continue General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 and direct staff accordingly." B. "Deny General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 with findings for denial." PROJECT PROPOSAL: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. I1-002 represents a request to amend the Housing Element: 1) to remove the reference to the project site on Page IV-16; 2) to remove Site 45 from Table IV-7 (Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use) on Page IV-17; and 3) to remove the discussion of Site 45 on Page IV-18 (Attachment No. 1). Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 11-002 represents a request to amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property (Attachment Nos. 4 and 5). The reason for the requests is to permit the development of a public skate park. The General Plan Housing Element specifies that the 2.7-acre site will be designated exclusively for residential uses and indicates that the City intends for the site to be developed with a minimum of 175 affordable units. In addition, the site is designated in the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (Town Center — Neighborhood) as "Residential Required". In order to permit the development of the proposed skate park, an amendment to the General Plan Housing Element and a Zoning Text Amendment to the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan is required to remove the housing designation on the project site. Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009 is processed concurrently with these legislative acts and is addressed under a separate staff report. It is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009 prior to action on the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment. Item 10. _ - r)ort—03/27/12 HB -502- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-002 Skate Park) m 1 Mc 70 i � 1 ®au. wAc ♦ ♦ �w7�ea A � — IItiiS '� 1 •CA9lIiLD f AM11M $� f - IPatIAPA}pT.R VICINITY MAP GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 (SKATE PARK PROJECT-7461 CENTER AVENUE) PC Staff Report-03/27/12 HB -503- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-Oo.Item I0. - 60 Background: The project site consists of approximately 2.7 acres located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street. The project site is bounded by McFadden Avenue on the north, a Union Pacific Railroad track to the east, Center Avenue to the south, and Southern California Edison (SCE) property with overhead electrical transmission lines to the west. The site is currently vacant and has never been developed with urban uses. The project site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. Study Session: The requests were presented to the Planning Commission for study session on February 28, 2012. An inquiry was made as to the City's performance in meeting the affordable housing obligations over time. The Planning Commission was provided with a copy of the 2011 Housing Element Progress Report which describes the status of the Housing Element and progress in its implementation. ISSUES: Subject Property and Surrounding Land Use,Zoning, and General Plan Designations: LOCATION GENERAL.PLAN- ZONING LAhTI)USE Subject Property: M-sp-d (Mixed Use— SP 14 (Beach and Vacant Specific Plan Overlay— Edinger Corridors Design Overlay) Specific Plan—Town Center Neighborhood) North(across P/OS (Park/Open Space) P-F (Public Facilities) Single Family McFadden Avenue in and RL (Residential— and R-1 (Single Family Residential and the City of Low) Residence) College Park Westminster) of Subject Property: South(across Center M-sp-d(Mixed Use— SP 14 (Beach and SCE Transmission Avenue) of Subject Specific Plan Overlay— Edinger Corridors Towers, Plant Nursery Property: Design Overlay) Specific Plan—Town Storage, and Shopping Center Neighborhood) Center East(across railroad M-sp (Mixed Use- SP 1 (North Huntington Old World Village and tracks) of Subject Specific Plan Overlay) Center Specific Plan) Multi-Family Property: Residential West of Subject M-sp-d(Mixed Use— SP 14 (Beach and SCE Transmission Property: Specific Plan Overlay— Edinger Corridors Lines and OCTA Design Overlay) Specific Plan— Town Transportation Center Center Neighborhood) General Plan Conformance: The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment are consistent with the following goals and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: Item 10._-_6_!port—03/27/12 HB -504- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-002 Skate Park) Land Use Element Goal L U 7: Achieve a diversity of land uses that sustain the City's economic viability, while maintaining the City's environmental resources and scale and character. Objective LU 7.1: Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that (a) provides for the housing, commercial, employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and recreation needs of existing and future residents, (b) provides employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding subregion, (c) captures visitor and tourist activity, and (d) provides open space and aesthetic"relief' form urban development. Although the Zoning Text Amendment proposes to remove the "Residential Required" designation from the subject site, a range of allowable uses would remain for the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. The mix of uses in this segment of the BECSP would allow for the development of a balance of land uses that sustain the City's economic vitality. Housing Element Goal H 2: Provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs. Policy H 2.2: Facilitate the development of mixed-use projects in appropriate commercial areas, including stand-alone residential development (horizontal mixed-use) and housing above ground floor commercial uses (vertical mixed-use). Establish mixed use zoning regulations. Policy H 2.3: Encourage and facilitate the provision of housing affordable to lower income households within the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan. Incorporate policy language and development standards within the Plan in support of affordable housing. Goal H 3: Assist in development of affordable housing. Policy H 3.1: Encourage the production of housing that meet all economic segments of the community, including lower, moderate, and upper income households, to maintain a balanced community. The project site is currently designated in the City's General Plan Housing Element for up to 175 affordable housing units on the project site. The proposed skate park project would amend the City's General Plan Housing Element and the BECSP to eliminate the "Residential Required" requirement. As such, the project would result in a net reduction in the City's potential affordable housing stock and would not be developed with residential uses that meet any economic segments of the community. The Housing Element identifies alternate sites within the City that could potentially be rezoned to accommodate additional housing. Although such zoning amendment(s) are not being processed concurrently, the City is committed to processing such amendment(s) as prescribed by State law. The proposed project would therefore be consistent with the General Plan Housing Element goals and policies. Zoning Compliance: Not applicable. PC Staff Report-03/27/12 HB_-505- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-00:Item 10. - 62 Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: Not applicable. Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009. Staff is recommending that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009 be certified as adequate and complete with findings and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Although the project results in adverse impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated or avoided, the Planning Commission may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is adopted. CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. The adverse impacts are unavoidable because it has been determined that no feasible mitigation is available at this time. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: The project is located in a Redevelopment Project area. The Economic Development Department has reviewed the proposed entitlements and recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The Economic Development Department has reviewed the proposed entitlements and recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the draft ordinance and resolution. No other departments have comments on the GPA and ZTA. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on March 15, 2012, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 1,000 ft. radius of the project site, interested parties, and individuals/organizations that commented on the environmental document. As of March 16, 2012, no letters were received in support or in opposition of the project. The legislative draft of the proposed changes to the City's Housing Element have also been sent to the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Their comments will be forwarded when received. Item_10 .-- ort-03/27/12 HB -506- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-002 Skate Park) Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): April 11, 2011 Not Applicable for Legislative Action GPA No. 11-002 and ZTA No. 11-002 were filed on March 11, 2011. ANALYSIS: The primary planning issues related to the requests pertain to the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, and the overall conformance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. General Plan Amendment The 2.7-acre project site is currently designated in the General Plan Housing Element for up to 175 affordable housing units towards fulfilling the City's affordable housing needs as determined in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). With the proposed skate park project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan Housing Element to remove the housing designation on the project site. There is no change to the General Plan designation for the subject site; it remains Mixed Use — Specific Plan Overlay—Design Overlay. The City of Huntington Beach, through the Housing Element, is required to show how the City's share of the RHNA, as determined by the Southern California Association of Governments, can be met. The RHNA allocation for the City is 2,092 units, distributed among the following income groups: 454 very low income, 369 low income, 414 moderate income, and 855 above moderate income units. Because of a shortfall in vacant sites necessary to fulfill the lower and moderate income housing needs, the City was required to commit to a rezoning program in the 2008 Housing Element update. Pursuant to AB 2348, a rezoning program to provide adequate sites to address a RHNA shortfall must adhere to the following parameters: ■ Sites must be rezoned to accommodate 100% of the RHNA shortfall for very low and low income units ® Rezoned sites for lower income households must accommodate residential uses"by right" ® Rezoned sites must be able to accommodate a minimum of 16 units ® At least 50% of sites rezoned to address the lower income housing shortfall need to be accommodated on sites designated for exclusively residential use At the time of the Housing Element update, the City was working on the BECSP. Because the BECSP was being structured to allow most residential projects by right (with a Site Plan Review), the City chose to designate sites within the BECSP area for the rezoning program. The Housing Element identified five potential sites. Ultimately, to address the City's lower income RHNA shortfall of 352 units on exclusively residential sites (50% of total 704 lower income RHNA shortfall), the project site and a site on Delaware Street (south of Main Street) were rezoned in the BECSP. With the development of the skate park being proposed at the project site, the amendment to the General Plan Housing Element to PC Staff Report-03/27/12 HB,-507- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-00_Item- 10. - 64 remove reference to the project site is necessary, as well as to demonstrate that the City has adequate other opportunities to replace the units at another to-be-rezoned site(s). The City's 2008 General Plan Housing Element identified three other sites with a combined potential unit yield of 210. As part of the subject General Plan Amendment, the City has identified four additional sites that could potentially yield approximately 725 units (Attachment No. 1). Thus, as amended the General Plan Housing Element demonstrates that the City has adequate sites that could be rezoned to satisfy State requirements. Nonetheless, the General Plan Amendment would remove the housing designation on the project site, resulting in a reduction in the City's potential affordable housing stock. State Law requires that replacement site(s) be rezoned in order for a City to have a certified Housing Element. If the City does not complete the rezoning before the next Housing Element cycle, which begins October 1, 2013, the "unaccommodated need" carries over to the next Housing Element cycle and the rezoning would need to be done within the first year of the next cycle. Until such time that this occurs, the City's Housing Element would not be certified by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Finally, state law encourages the rezoning to occur as soon as possible so that there is time in the planning period of the Housing Element cycle for a project to potentially be developed. It is anticipated that the City Council will provide direction to staff regarding the sites to be rezoned when the subject requests are considered by them. Although the rezoning of alternate sites within the City is not being processed at this time, the proposed General Plan Amendment demonstrates that the City can fulfill the goals and policies of the General Plan to provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs. Zoning Text Amendment The project site is located in the Town Center— Neighborhood segment of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The BECSP currently designates the site as "Residential Required" and any future development would require residential units. In order to develop the proposed skate park, a Zoning Text Amendment to the BECSP is required to remove the housing designation on the project site. The Town Center — Neighborhood segment of the BECSP allows for a mix of uses, ranging from retail uses to civic and cultural uses and from office uses to residential uses. If the "Residential Required" designation on the project site is removed by the Zoning Text Amendment, a range of allowable uses would remain for the project site in the Town Center — Neighborhood segment of the BECSP. The development of a skate park, as a recreation facility, is categorized as a civic and cultural use which is permitted with a Site Plan Review and would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan to sustain the City's economic vitality. Finally, State law requires that if a jurisdiction reduces the density of any parcel identified in the Housing Element to meet housing need that it make certain findings. The proposed Zoning Text Amendment does not change the allowed density of the parcel (there is no maximum in the BECSP), and should the Skate Park project not go forward a residential project would still be allowed on the subject parcel pursuant to the property's Town Center-Neighborhood designation. Nonetheless, as discussed in the General Plan Amendment analysis above, the City has adequate remaining sites to offset the loss of potential housing on the subject site and the proposed Zoning Text Amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan. Item- 0.µyy65,)ort—03/27/12 HB -508- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-002 Skate Park) SUMMARY: Staffs Recommendation: Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-002 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 11-002 based upon the following: • Facilitates the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community. • Improves the City's fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events. ® Complements a diversity of uses within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan area, particularly along Center Avenue corridor. ■ Demonstrates that the City has adequate sites to fulfill Housing Element goals. ATTACHMENTS: City Couneil Resolution NC for- General Plan e ,eia1v1t No. 11 nno V 2. Suggested L'•.,.7ings f Zoning Teat n„. endi:aenl No. 11 002 3. Draft OFdinanee Ne. faf Zoning Text Amendment No. 11 002 4. Existing T2EGSP (Ze ;,.rt)_Map S. Proposed BEGSP (Zeniag) Map . Pr-eJeet Naffative dated and f-eeeived MaT-eh 11, T SH:MBB:HF:TN PC Staff Report-03/27/12 HB -509- (12sr15 GPA 11-002/ZTA 11-OO,Item 10. - 66 ATTAC H M E N T #6 DRAFT CENTER AVE SKATE PARK 'E ; i 2011 PROJECT NARRATIVE Dept. of Planning Entitlement Request `"BuMing The applicant requests a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment of a 2.718 acre parcel identified as APN 142-073-03 located just east of the intersection of Gothard Street and Center Avenue. Project Description VF Outdoor, Inc. (Vans) proposes to lease vacant property from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (Agency) to design, develop, maintain and operate a public skate park. The project shall include approximately 12,000 square feet of skate park plaza area, 15,000 square feet of skate bowl area, a 3,000 square foot skate shop/concession/restroom building, 15,000 square feet of turf/walking area and 24 paved parking stalls fronting Center Ave(see attached Conceptual Site Plan). The project will also include shade areas at prime viewing areas and restrooms which will be accessible to the public. The skate park shall meet and comply with all ADA standards and shall resemble that of other skate parks developed by other local municipalities. The skate park will be open to the public and operate seven days a week, from 10 am to 10 pm. The skate park will be supervised during business hours. The supervision will help to keep daily noise levels to a minimum. The skate park will also be a 100 percent fenced facility providing 24 hour security ensuring no additional noise after 10 pm. Vans will host up to 15 event days throughout the year which may require the need for overflow parking and temporary seating areas for spectators. Twelve event days shall be held on weekends and generally draw 300 to 500 spectators per event day. The remaining three event days will consist of one major event held annually expected to draw up to 2,500 spectators per event day, starting on a Friday and ending on a Sunday. During these events,visitors shall be directed to park their vehicles at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex located on Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue and transported to the site via shuttle buses. Signage and/or parking attendants will be present to direct visitor traffic to the temporary parking area and pedestrians to the skate park during major events. Park visitors shall enter the park via Center Avenue. Vendors shall enter the site via McFadden Avenue and stage on the north end of the park. Temporary grandstand seating and portable restrooms will be placed to accommodate an audience of up to 2,500 people during and removed at the end of each event. The project will include a public address system used moderately during normal operation hours. Amplified music and announcements will occur during special events and occasionally during normal operating hours. During special events, amplified music and announcements will continue through the duration of the event. A host will be on a loud speaker during these events. HB -511- Item 10. - 68 Parking Accommodations Vans anticipates up to 2,500 guests during major events. A significant number of guests are expected to be local youth arriving to the park by foot or other non-vehicular forms of transpiration. Guests arriving by vehicle will be directed to park at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex located on Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue approximately 2.8 miles south of the proposed skate park and transported to the park via shuttle buses. The Huntington Beach Sport Complex has 850 stalls. Prior to scheduling events, Vans will coordinate with Community Services to allocate appropriate parking stall reserves at the Huntington Beach Sports Complex. To ensure adequacy of parking, Vans will schedule major events on non-event days for the Sports Complex. Guests parking at the Sports Complex will be shuttled to the skate park via shuttle buses. Up to six shuttle buses will be utilized to accommodate guest demand. Shuttle drivers will follow a specified shuttle route (see attached Shuttle Route). Applicant/Owner The project site is owned the by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (Agency). Vans will lease the site from the Agency and design, develop and plan operations at the proposed skate park. Project Location The proposed site is located on Center Avenue, approximately 500 feet east of Gothard Street. The project site is 2.718 acres in size and is identified as APN 142-073-03. A conceptual site plan is attached. Planning Requirements The Applicant is requesting approval of the following: • General Plan Amendment • Zoning Text Amendment • Environmental Assessment General Plan Amendment The General Plan Land Use Plan designates the site as M-sp-d (Mixed Use— Specific Plan Overlay—Design Overlay). The General Plan Housing Elements specifies that the site shall be designated as "Residential Only" in the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan and that the Agency intends to develop a minimum of 175 affordable units on the site. The applicant proposes to amend the language of the General Plan Housing Element to allow the development of the skate park by lifting the "Residential Only" requirement. Specific Plan Amendment Item 10. - 69 HB -512- The site falls within the Town Center—Neighborhood designation within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Furthermore,the Specific Plan designates the Site as "Residential Required", meaning that any future development would require residential units. The applicant does not intend to develop residential units and therefore is requesting a Zoning Text Amendment to remove the "Residential Only"requirement on page 14 of the Specific Plan. Replacement Housing The proposed project would result in a loss of 175 potential affordable housing units. The Economic Development Department has identified five replacement affordable housing sites that will generate a total of 240 affordable units, a net increase of 65 new units not previously identified in the General Plan Housing Element. The proposed replacement sites are as follows: ■ Pacific City- 119 affordable units shifted back ■ Slater and Keelson - 6 affordable units • Beach and Warner—77 affordable units (50 net new) ■ Edinger and Gothard—40 affordable units ■ Beach/Main/Ellis-40 affordable units (25 net new) Existing and Surrounding uses The General Plan Map designates the parcel as Mix Use with both Specific Plan and Design Overlays (M-sp-d) and falls within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The Specific Plan designates the site as Town Center—Neighborhood and requires residential. The site is surrounded by following uses: West—Golden West College South—Commercial Strip Center/Bella Terra Phase II East—Old World Village/Multi-Family Residential North—Westminster Park/Industrial Use Population Served The skate park shall be open to the public and will serve local residents as well as city visitors. Generally speaking, the park shall be most frequented by youth, however,planned skate events are expected to attract visitors of all ages. HB -513- Item 10. - 70 Project Contacts Applicant Doug Palladini Vice President of Marketing VF Outdoor, Inc. (Vans) 6550 Katella Avenue Cypress, CA 90630-5102 Phone: (714) 889-6702 Dougjalladini@vfc.com Architect/Designer_ Joseph M. Ciaglia California Skateparks 273 N. Benson Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Phone: (909) 949.1601 joe@califomiaskateparks.com City of Huntington Beach Planning Department Tess Nguyen Planner Phone: (714) 374-1744 tnguyen@surfcity-hb.org City of Huntington Beach Economic Development Department Luis Gomez Project Manager Phone: 714 536-5544 luis.gomez@surfcity-hb.org Item 10. - 71 HB -514- ATTACHMENT #7 Final EIR No. 10-009, includes ®raft EIR, EIR Appendices, Response to Comments, and Text Changes (Not Attached — Available for Public Review at the Planning and Zoning Counter — 3rd Floor, City Hall) Item 10. - 73 HB -516- ATTACHMENT #8 Zoning Text Amendment No . 11 -002 psm"M X, A, Existing N, T N BECSP T J, "I@- fity"'Ibf Westminster "44,5 (Zoning) X "g, NA Kl�i L, 4ff P, V "I T -1 Map X jV �ry N, 'A% U '1 1 "'E J" 0 N -v N j v. Z-� 1A A- WIN 8" Oil ""• N North n tj,p nm A Y Centers z MI. " qq, ji peci A 11F, m 'W" -- Publ ....... -41 "'S X ic- emipublic, t W, J A A- §A P I N X 10"""', 'P R L R . " M N 0 -T-6 rra "IF "'Bella, Specific A X 'An " 11,-',-4- 4f 41 'R p�7 Plan g P A., Town CE nter z J A, Boulev jA ard Segment R Town Center Cor R, Z4111 --im, '0 k 004 M F Tow---To—wn Center Bouleva S eg t�ne-nt n nt r boullevard Segment F Al 'T, "M + ............ WN �A & ik o vil :L "A j- a g "ME g A, n us ria , 4-ko-,,, • beside urn High clusirial 12, & --M,J",Restclentia'l' ji Z 14NX t- U -cf,.Ge-he g-- Q General t -(IG) Ei", hsit u, V, Density MH) RV) I R .r.a...... ---------- I --g sw 006 00, 0,- OoMq 21011 'T Item I I NOMMMNI�F #i HB -518- W ATTACHMENT #9 Zoning Text Amendment No . 11 -002 ­ ........ "F A Vi_w_ jg - g­"q 7­ f A 4 -R, A, A R Proposed A s'rAk R BECSP City` r I'4I I1fs,tAAWkft A% i f\M4w 0.M....Ew..k*..*W.. ftA;�fflo ""A'lgpr ,A -'- mO6wIN�*- �Jm 'M MPII Un" sitV Se'Ar'I ,I IW I III IP'J"f MV 1� , IE -lh00,d151 1�12­ M FR , AJI RrIT M� I wIsIftEll"' 11 v 1ll n -4 I 7 A aZ� 1-1 i3Ag ,) e"h t i a T&4l *T 6 A?­ w \IVU(*7S"IpAA ­Zl 67 , ' ,R,1 o n4 ipn\ 0g'X1lM1a1 n qky, )3i A R Ma s. .Lbw ti y1FA uy 8 JR NI is A, A North,H untington A. ug ter ,- PAWAIMMOR`\1 W� r _ 'ec Aa ITFc Ian,P W Public-Semi ublic k R O o v,x T , Bella Terra , ,,y SPecfiCS Town CEnter in "W" Boulev3rdmil X Segme ; A Town Cnter ��Cor 6 Mft u. owwL&enter Boulevadec(n Town C nter Boul vard egmeq,t 2 0R. A Qstrj8 Re i eha - nddsfria Hi h4 0 IGeneral eDensity g S [Dense 1 fG)T9 AR o w M N4 All j� .............. n j5 W1 , Wi, a k­ k 1*11,01 44 Ik' k i 00, ",IN 4 v m- Yz r 4 R I W, I Item 10. 77— HB, 520- ATTACHMENT # 10 CENTER AVENUE SKATE PARK PROJECT Findings of Fact/ Statement of Overriding Considerations Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street,Third Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 Prepared by PER Services Corporation 1 Venture Plaza,Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92618 March 13, 2012 Item 10. - 79 HB -522- Table ®f Contents Page CHAPTER1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER2 CEQA FINDINGS...............................................................................................................................................3 2.1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 3 FINDINGS REGARDING THE REJECTED PROJECT AND PROJECT ALTERNATIVES...................7 3.1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................................7 3.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................................................................7 3.3 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES......................................................................................................................................8 3.4 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS......................................................................................................................................... CHAPTER 4 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................ 12 4.1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................................12 4.2 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS..............................................................................................................................12 4.3 FINDINGS...............................................................................................................................................................................13 4.4 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS—.............................................................................................................................13 City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation HB -523- Item 10. - 80 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This document presents the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations that must be adopted by the City of Huntington Beach (City) pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15091 and 15093, respectively, of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) prior to the approval of the Center Avenue Skate Park Project(proposed project). This document is organized as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction to the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Chapter 2 Presents the CEQA Findings of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), including the identified significant land use and noise impacts. Chapter 3 Presents the alternatives to the proposed project and evaluates them in relation to the findings contained in Section 15091(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City must consider and make findings regarding alternatives when a project would involve environmental impacts that cannot be reduced to a less-than-significant level, or cannot be substantially reduced,by proposed mitigation measures. Chapter 4 Presents a Statement of Overriding Considerations that is required in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines for significant impacts of the proposed project that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. The project applicant proposes to lease vacant property from the City to design, develop, maintain and operate a public skate park The proposed project includes approximately 14,000 square feet of skate park plaza area, 13,000 square feet of skate bowl area, a 3,500-square-foot skate shop/concession/restroom building, 15,000 square feet of turf/walking area, a 480-square-foot skate park restroom structure, a 200- square-foot skate park entrance kiosk, the main parking lot near the primary site access fronting Center Ave, and a secondary parking area off McFadden Ave to be used only for special events. The project would include extensive landscaping and turf areas, sidewalks, walkways, trash/recycling facilities, drinking fountains, and restrooms, all of which would be accessible to the public. Additionally, in order to allow for potential future development of a transit stop, the proposed project includes the dedication of a "Transit Reserve Area." The project as proposed would result in significant unavoidable project-level impacts with respect to land use and noise. In comparison to the alternatives analyzed against the proposed development, the City finds in the Draft EIR that Alternative 3, the Alternate Location Alternative, would be considered the environmentally superior alternative. The following discretionary approvals by the City of Huntington Beach are required to implement the proposed project: a Certification of Environmental Impact Report(Planning Commission) City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR ServinPs Corporation Item 10. - 81 HB -524- 1. Introduction March 2012 ■ General Plan Amendment(Planning Commission and City Council) ■ Zoning Text Amendment(Planning Commission and City Council) o Site Plan Review(Planning Commission) ■ Variance (Planning Commission) City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation 01 1-18 -525- Item 10. - 82 CHAPTER 2 CEQA FINDINGS 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the potential impacts that were identified in the EIR and the findings that are required in accordance with Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines. The possible findings for each significant and/or potentially significant adverse impact are as follows: 1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which avoid, substantially lessen, or reduce the magnitude of the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR("Finding 1"). 2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the findings. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can, and should be,adopted by such other agency("Finding 2"). 3) Specific economic,social,or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives in the EIR("Finding 3"). CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or alternatives, where feasible, to avoid or substantially reduce significant environmental impacts that would otherwise occur as a result of a project. Project modification or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying the project lies with some other agency (State CEQA Guidelines §15091, subdivision (a), [3]). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors." (See also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors [Goleta II] [1990] 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 [276 Cal.Rptr.410].) Only after fully complying with the findings requirement can an agency adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 Cal.App.3d 433,442,445 [243 Cal. Rptr. 727]). CEQA requires the Lead Agency to state in writing the specific rationale to support its actions based on the Final EIR and/or information in the record. This written statement is known as the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Statement of Overriding Considerations provides the information that demonstrates the decision-making body of the Lead Agency has weighed the benefits of the project against its unavoidable adverse effects in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered"acceptable." The California Supreme Court has stated that, "the wisdom of approving any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta II, 52 Cal.3d 553, 576 [276 Cal. Rptr.401].) City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation 3 Item 10. - 83 H13 -526- 2. CEQA Findings March 2012 This document presents the City of Huntington Beach findings as required by CEQA, cites substantial evidence in the record in support of each of the findings, and presents an explanation to supply the logical step between the finding and the facts in the record (State CEQA Guidelines §15091). Additional facts that support the findings are set forth in the Draft EIR,the Final EIR,staff reports,and the record of proceedings. Table 2-1, CEQA Findings for the Center Avenue Skate Park Project, below, summarizes the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project identified in the Draft EIR that were reduced to less-than- significant levels with mitigation,as well as the project-level significant unavoidable impacts. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation • HB -527- Item 10. - 84 CD March 2012 2. CEQA Findings O Table 2-1 00 CEQA Findings for the Center Avenue Skate Park Impact Statement Impact Summary Findings E. LAND USE AND PLANNING Impact 4.E-1 The project would result in less than The proposed project would not result in conflicts Finding 3. The proposed project would reduce the significant land use impacts with regard to with the SCAG RTP, SCAG RCP, BECSP, or HBZSO; availability of sites within the City of Huntington consistency with the SCAG Regional Transportation however, the loss of potential on-site affordable Beach to provide affordable housing as required in Plan (RTP), SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan housing units as identified in the SCAG RHNA and the SCAG RHNA and the City's General Plan Housing (RCP), the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific the City's General Plan Housing Element would Element, and would also conflict with applicable Plan(BECSP) and the Huntington Beach Zoning and conflict with the housing allocation requirements of goals and policies of the City's General Plan Subdivision Ordinance. However, land use impacts these plans, which is considered a significant regarding the generation of noise. As such, the with respect to conflicts with the SCAG Regional unavoidable impact, since the timing of rezoning an proposed project would have a significant Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and City of alternative site within the City that could provide unavoidable land use impact, and no feasible Huntington Beach General Plan would be significant such housing is uncertain at this time. Further, mitigation is available. The City finds specific and unavoidable. special event noise at the skate park would exceed economic, social, or other considerations make established thresholds and therefore would conflict infeasible the project alternatives in the EIR. with applicable goals and policies in the City's General Plan related to noise generation. F. NOISE x Impact 4.F-3 Project implementation would have a Project-related noise generation would remain Finding 3. The proposed project would generate W minimal effect on the existing noise environment below established thresholds during normal day-to- noise levels during special events that would exceed within and adjacent to the Project Area during day operation of the proposed skate park and retail the City's established noise thresholds. As such,the � normal skate park and retail operations. Thus,long- use. However, crowd noise and noise from proposed project would have a significant term noise impacts under normal operation would amplified music and announcements during unavoidable noise impact, and no feasible be less than significant. However, periodic special periodic special events would exceed the City's mitigation is available. The City finds specific events would temporarily exceed the allowable noise thresholds and impacts would be significant economic, social, or other considerations make noise thresholds at adjacent noise-sensitive and unavoidable even with implementation of infeasible the project alternatives in the EIR. residential uses. Thus, operational noise impacts applicable mitigation measures. are considered significant and unavoidable. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation 5 2. Findings :h 2012 Table 2-1 CEQA Findings for the Center Avenue Skate Park Impact Statement Impact Summary Findings G. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION Impact 4.G-3 The project would provide on-site Parking for the skate park and retail use would be Finding 1. The City finds that the identified changes parking to accommodate the day-to-day needs of provided on-site and is considered adequate to or alterations in the project, which would reduce guests and employees to the site. Special events meet projected parking demands of the proposed Impact 4.G-3 to less-than-significant levels, are could result in off-site parking impacts to uses. However, during special events at the skate hereby incorporated into the project. No additional neighboring uses. However, implementation of park, an off-site parking program (per mitigation mitigation measures are necessary with the mitigation measure 4.G-1 would ensure that measure 4.13-1) would be required to be implementation of mitigation measure 4.G-1. potentially significant parking impacts to implemented to reduce potentially significant short- neighboring uses during special events are reduced term parking impacts to less than significant. to a less than significant level. x N F--1 CD City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park • PCR Services Corporation 6 00 O\ CHAPTER 3 FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 3.1 INTRODUCTION The EIR prepared for the Center Avenue Skate Park Project considered three separate alternatives to the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the primary intent of an alternatives evaluation is to "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." This chapter describes the project objectives used to evaluate project alternatives presented in the Draft EIR and recommend the proposed project. A description of the alternatives compared to the proposed project and the findings regarding the feasibility of adopting the described alternatives is presented for use by the City in the decision-making process. 3.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objectives of the proposed project identified by the City and project applicant, respectively, are presented below. City Objectives ■ Implement the policies and development standards of the City's General Plan, Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) as referred to in the BECSP. ■ Create a development that is compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. ■ Enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of a high quality master skate park that attracts users from across the City. ■ Minimize development and operational cost to the City by partnering with a private equity partner. ■ Mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. Applicant Objectives ■ Develop a skate park facility that is free of admission and open to the public. ■ Build a new master skate park facility large enough to meet the current and future demand of Huntington Beach skate board enthusiasts. ■ Locate a master skate park in an area with nearby public amenities that support skate park users, such as public transit, accessible pathways, trees and benches, and restrooms within a reasonable distance. ■ Provide a state-of-the-art skate park facility designed to allow for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational skate board enthusiast population. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation 7 Item 10. - 87 HB -530- 3. Findings March 2012 Develop a skate park in a location that is readily accessible, highly visible, and provides a safe environment for visitors. 3.3 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES The range of feasible alternatives was selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making. Among the factors that were taken into account when considering the feasibility of alternatives (as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6[f][1]) were environmental impacts,economic viability, availability of infrastructure,regulatory limitations,jurisdictional boundaries,and attainment of project objectives. As stated in Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines,an EIR need not consider an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified, whose implementation is remote or speculative, or one that would not achieve the basic project objectives. The analysis includes sufficient information about each alternative to provide meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison with the proposed project 3.4 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS The following is a description of the alternatives evaluated in comparison to the proposed project, as well as a description of the specific economic, social, or other considerations that make them infeasible for avoiding or lessening the impacts. The City finds that the adoption of any of the alternatives to the project is infeasible. The reasons for each finding are provided following the description of the alternative, and are further described in the Draft EIR. As described in Chapter 5,Alternatives, of the Draft EIR, three alternatives were evaluated in comparison to the proposed project. The environmental advantages and disadvantages of each of these alternatives are described. The alternatives that were selected for analysis include: ■ Alternative 1 - No Project/No Development Alternative- Under the No Project/No Development Alternative,no improvements to the project site would occur, and the site would remain in its vacant, undeveloped state. Additionally, the project site would remain designated as "Residential Required" under the BECSP,with the potential to accommodate up to 175 affordable housing units. ® Alternative 2 -Reduced Project Alternative-Under the Reduced Project Alternative,the proposed skate park and retail/concession use would be constructed and operated at the project site, but would be reduced in terms of skate facilities and retail/concession intensity. Specifically, the proposed skate park and retail/concession use would be constructed at the project site, but would exclude the skate bowl area, reduce the skate plaza area to 8,000 square feet, and reduce the retail/concession use to 2,000 square feet. This represents a reduction of 13,000 square feet of skate bowl area, 6,000 square feet of skate plaza area, and 1,500 square feet of retail/concession floor area relative to the proposed project. Despite the reduction in development intensity on-site under this Alternative,it is assumed that special events would still be held at the reduced skate park ® Alternative 3 - Alternate Location Alternative - Under the Alternate Location Alternative the proposed project would be developed with the same skate park and retail/concession facilities and development intensity as the proposed project, but at another location in the City. Specifically, the proposed skate park and retail/concession use would be constructed and operated on County-owned property at the former Gothard Landfill site,which is located at 18131 Gothard Street,on west side of Gothard Street south of Talbert Avenue. The project would be built on a 3.5-acre portion of the City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation HB -531- Item 10. - 88 March 2012 —PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT 11— 3. Findings approximately 11.5-acre property along the eastern side of the site fronting Gothard Street, and would include all improvements contemplated as part of the proposed project, including on-site parking and additional space for special event parking and turf/vendor areas. Specifically, the northern half of the site would be developed with an above-grade skate bowl area, a 15,000 square- foot above-grade skate plaza area,a 4,000-square-foot retail/concession use and restroom structure, a turf area surrounding the skate plaza (which would also contain temporary spectator seating during special events), and on-site surface parking lot with 40 parking spaces. The southern half of the alternate site would remain undeveloped to provide space for special event parking. Primary vehicle access would be provided by a driveway at the northeastern corner of the site on Gothard Street,while a secondary access would be located at the southeast corner of the property and would only be used during special events. As the site is currently designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan and zoned for open space/recreation, amendments to the City's General Plan and Zoning Code would be required under this Alternative. Additionally,since the site is a former landfill, various structures housing equipment to capture landfill gases are located throughout the site and would remain on-site under this Alternative to address landfill gas-related hazards. This site may also contain sensitive biological resources, such as coastal sage scrub habitat, though the extent of such resources has not yet been determined. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Evaluation In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(c), an EIR should identify any alternatives that were considered for analysis but rejected as infeasible and briefly explain the reasons for their rejection. According to the CEQA Guidelines, among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration are the alternative's failure to meet most of the basic project objectives (outlined above),the alternative's infeasibility,or the alternative's inability to avoid significant environmental impacts. Given the relatively specific objectives of the proposed project and the limited scope of proposed uses, no additional project Alternatives were considered for analysis in this EIR. No Project/No Development Alternative Alternative 1, the No Project/No Development Alternative, would not result in any physical changes to the project site and no development would occur. The No Project/No Development Alternative would result in reduced impacts with regard to all environmental issues except for aesthetics (operational visual quality) and hydrology and water quality (operational water quality), which would be greater than under the proposed project, and would avoid significant unavoidable land use and noise impacts that would occur under the proposed project. Alternative 1 would fail to meet any of the project's goals and objectives,either partially or fully. Findings The City hereby finds that the No Project/No Development Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental,economic,social, and other considerations: ® Would not enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of a high quality master skate park that attracts users from across the City. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation 9 Item 10. - 89 HB -532- 3. Findings March 2012 ® Would not minimize development and operational cost to the City by partnering with a private equity partner. ® Would not develop a skate park facility that is free of admission and open to the public. ® Would not build a new master skate park facility large enough to meet the current and future demand of Huntington Beach skate board enthusiasts. ® Would not locate a master skate park in an area with nearby public amenities that support skate park users, such as public transit, accessible pathways, trees and benches, and restrooms within a reasonable distance. ® Would not provide a state-of-the-art skate park facility designed to allow for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational skate board enthusiast population. • Would not develop a skate park in a location that is readily accessible, highly visible, and provides a safe environment for visitors. Reduced Project Alternative Under Alternative 2, the Reduced Project Alternative, the proposed skate park and retail/concession use would be constructed and operated at the project site, but would be reduced in terms of skate facilities and retail/concession intensity. Alternative 2 would result in less impacts regarding aesthetics (visual character and light and glare), air quality (localized and regional construction emissions and operational emissions, AQMP consistency, pollutant concentrations, and odors), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions), hydrology and water quality (hydrology, drainage, and water quality), noise (construction and operational noise and vibration), and transportation/traffic (intersection LOS, CMP impacts, access/circulation, alternative transportation plan consistency). This Alternative would also result in similar impacts regarding greenhouse gas emissions (GHG plan consistency), land use (plan consistency), and transportation/traffic (parking). This Alternative would not result in any impacts greater than those under the proposed project. Alternative 2 would at least partially meet many of the project's goals and objectives, but would not achieve all goals and objectives to the extent the project would. Findings The City hereby finds that the Reduced Project Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental, economic,social, and other considerations: ® Would not build a new master skate park facility large enough to meet the current and future demand of Huntington Beach skate board enthusiasts. ■ Would not provide a state-of-the-art skate park facility designed to allow for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational skate board enthusiast population. Alternate Location Alternative Under the Alternate Location Alternative the proposed project would be developed with the same skate park and retail/concession facilities and development intensity as the proposed project,but at another location in the City. Alternative 3 would result in similar impacts regarding aesthetics (construction and operational City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation - HB -533- Item 10. - 90 March 2012 —PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT 3. Findings visual character and light/glare), air quality (AQMP consistency, construction emissions, and operational emissions), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions and GHG plan consistency), hydrology and water quality (hydrology, drainage, and water quality), noise (violation of noise standards, groundborne vibration, and permanent noise increases), and traffic/transportation (intersection LOS, access/circulation, and alternative transportation). Alternative 3 would result in less impacts regarding air quality (exposure to substantial pollutant concentrations and odors), land use (plan consistency), noise (temporary or periodic noise increases),and transportation/traffic (parking). Alternative 3 would not result in any impacts greater than those under the proposed project among those issues analyzed in the EIR. However, Alternative 3 would result in greater impacts than the proposed project with regard to biological resources, geology and soils, and hazards and hazardous materials. Alternative 3 would fully meet all of the project objectives. Findings The City hereby finds that the Alternate Location Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social,and other considerations: • Would not be located on a site that is owned by the City of Huntington Beach and available for development, and therefore would not minimize development cost. • Would result in potential additional environmental impacts related to biological resources (sensitive habitat) and hazardous materials (landfill gas). City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park ^orporation Item 10. - 91 HB -534- CHAPTER 4 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTION Section 15093 of the CEQA guidelines states: (a) CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects,the adverse environmental effects may be considered"acceptable." (b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reason to support its actions based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations,the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. The City of Huntington Beach (City) proposes to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the significant project-specific land use and noise impacts of the proposed project. Although all other project-level impacts are reduced to less-than-significant levels, this section describes the anticipated economic, social, and other benefits or other considerations of the proposed project to support the decision to proceed with the project even though two identified project-specific impacts are not mitigated to a less- than-significant level. 4.2 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS The City is proposing to approve the proposed project, with revisions to reduce environmental impacts, and has prepared an EIR required by CEQA. Even with revisions in the project, the following impacts are unavoidable because it has been determined that no feasible mitigation is available. Refer to Chapter 2 (CEQA Findings) for further clarification regarding the impacts listed below. Land Use and Planning ■ Project-Specific - The proposed project would result in conflicts with the SCAG RHNA for 2006- 2014 and the applicable goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. Noise ® Project-Specific -The proposed project would result in temporary noise increases associated with periodic special events on-site, during which noise levels would exceed established thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park PCR Services Corporation HB -535- Item 10. - 92 March 2012 4.Statement of Overriding Considerations 4.3 FINDINGS The City has evaluated all feasible mitigation measures and project revisions with respect to the project's impacts (see Chapter 2, CEQA Findings). The City has also examined a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project (see Chapter 3, Findings Regarding Project Alternatives). Based on this examination, the City has determined that because of its location (i.e., not located near residential uses or other noise- sensitive uses, or on a site designated for affordable housing units) Alternative 3, the Alternate Location Alternative, is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. All of the other alternatives listed above would potentially result in lesser environmental impacts than the proposed project, although not necessarily less than significant. However,the City finds all three of the evaluated alternatives infeasible and less desirable than the proposed project and has rejected these alternatives from further consideration because they would not achieve the environmental, economic, social, and other considerations outlined in Chapter 3 (Findings Regarding Project Alternatives). 4.4 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Specific economic, social, or other considerations outweigh the project-specific land use and noise impacts stated above. The reasons for proceeding with the proposed project, even though identified project-specific impacts are not fully mitigated to a less-than-significant level, are described below. Project Benefits 1. The proposed project would provide a new state-of-the-art skate park and associated retail/concession use that would be located in close proximity to public transit facilities and residential communities. 2. The project would provide additional year-round, fee-free recreational opportunities within the City through provision of a state-of-the-art skate park on land owned by the City. 3. The project would increase the City's tax revenue through sales tax from retail sales and periodic special events. 4. The project would improve the visual quality and character of the project site through implementation of the design standards contained in the BECSP, including architectural features, lighting,signage, and landscaping. S. The project would minimize consumption of natural resources through implementation of sustainability features such as drought-tolerant landscaping, efficient lighting and plumbing fixtures, skylights, and waste recycling facilities. City of Huntington Beach Center Avenue Skate Park " ----- "orporation 13 Item 10. - 93 1113 -536- ATTACHMENT # 11 iiii _. .. - Item 10. - 94 THE SKATE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 Applicant: VF Outdoor, Inc. Location: 7491 Center Avenue Date: May 7, 2012 REQU EST®G PA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • To amend the Housing Element: —to update the list and associated discussion of sites that may be rezoned to exclusively residential use, including removing the reference to the City-owned property on McFadden Avenue (Table IV-7) —to update the list of opportunity sites (Table IV-6) to reflect that a portion of one site is now listed in Table IV-7 1 Item 10. - 95 HB -538- � � 1 a RE U EST-ZTA ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT • To amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property k k 3 PROJECT SITE LOCATION ' f Center Avenue,approx. 500 ft east of Gothard Street SURROUNDINGS North: Single Family Residential, College Park South: SCE Towers,Plant Nursery Storage, ` '' ;L Shopping Center East: Old World Village, Multi-Family ten Residential - West: SCE Transmission Lines,OCTA Center 7 HB —539— Item 10. - 96 ,3> GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • The project site is currently designated in the General Plan Housing Element for up to 175 housing units towards fulfilling the City's affordable housing needs as determined in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment • With the development of skate park being proposed at the project site: — the amendment to the General Plan Housing Element to remove reference to the project site is necessary — the City needs to show that adequate opportunities to replace the housing units at other locations within the City exist a yRfi. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • The City has identified three additional potential sites that could be rezoned to satisfy State requirements • It is anticipated that the City Council will provide direction to staff regarding the sites to be rezoned • The proposed GPA demonstrates that the City can fulfill the goals and policies of the General Plan to provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs 3 Item 10. - 97 HB -540- Fps ®NItV TEA AMENDMENT • The project site is located in the Town Center-Neighborhood segment of the BECSP • The BECSP designates the site as"Residential Required" and any future development would require residential units • With the development of the proposed skate park, a Zoning Text Amendment to the BECSP is required to remove the housing designation on the project site Z INS TE T AMENDMENT • The Town Center-Neighborhood segment of the BECSP allows for a mix of uses • if the"Residential Required" designation on the project site is removed by the ZTA, a range of allowable uses would remain for the project site in the Town Center-Neighborhood segment • The development of a skate park, as a recreational facility, is categorized as a civic and cultural use which would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan to sustain the City's economic vitality n HB -541- Item 10. - 98 wk6 EC®MMEN®AT'I®N a).fl...xrts'33 Staff is recommending approval of the GPA No. 11-002, ZTA No. 11-002 based on the following: • Facilitates the development of a public skate park to provide additional recreational opportunities for the community • Improves the fiscal viability by stimulating tourism and increasing tax revenues in conjunction with the skate park special events �s REC®MMEN®A°TI®N • Complements a diversity of uses within the BECSP area, particularly along the Center Avenue corridor • Demonstrates that the City has adequate sites to fulfill Housing Element goals 5 Item 10. - 99 HB -542- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, May 7, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-002/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11-002 (SKATE PARK PROJECT) Applicant: VF Outdoor, Inc. Property Owner: City of Huntington Beach Request: GPA: To amend the Housing Element: 1) to remove the reference to the project site on Page IV-16; 2) to remove Site #5 from Table IV-7 (Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use) on Page IV-17; and 3) to remove the discussion of Site #5 on Page IV-18. ZTA: To amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property. Location: 7461 Center Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site on Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street) Project Planner: Tess Nguyen NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the proposed amendments are covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 10-009, approved by the Planning Commission on March 27, 2012. EIR No. 10-009 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, May 3, 2012. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions, please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2"d Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ 050712 GPA 11-002 ZTA 11-002(Skate Park) 09R8/09�5®luany oane olg LAwoo ww Lg x Luw 9Z}ewjol ap a4.9nb113 0918/09 G5®luany gilts algliedWoo„g/g Z x«1 azis lagel , 31 32 32 Ocean View Elem. School Dist. Westminster School District Westminster School District William Loose, Superintendent Clark Hampton Richard Tauer, Superintendent 17200 Pinehurst Lane 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 14121 Cedarwood Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 Westminster, CA 92683 31 33 33 Ocean View Elem. School Dist. HB Union High School District HB Union High School District Attn: Cindy Pulfer, Admin. Services Stephen Ritter Greg Plutko, Superintendent 17200 Pinehurst Lane 5832 Bolsa Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 34 36 40I Cannery Hamilton Properties, LLC OC County Harbors, Beach& Parks Hearthside Homes Ascon Landfill Site c/o Tamara Zeier Dept, 6 Executive Circle, Suite 250 One Pointe Drive, Suite 320 P.O. Box 4048 Irvine, CA 92614 Brea, CA 92821 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 46 46 49 Gabrieleno/Tongva Tribal Council Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Coastkeepers Chairperson Acjachemen Nation Gary Brown PO Box 693 31411 La Matanza Street 3151 Airway Ave. Suite F-110 San Gabriel, CA 91778 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-2625 Costa Mesa, CA 92663 II label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ttiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 '._` 09009190 AJ@AV MAP @gI-edwoo ww Zg x ww 5Z Imiol ap oll@nb113 091.9/09190 A,@Ad qj!m @gjpdwoc„2/9 Z x„G azls loqul Susan Mondragon Jo-Ann Purcell Diane Ryan 15362 Cascade Lane 7251 Wellesley Avenue 7701 Etna Circle Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Edith and Gary Gonzales Jerry Wheeler 5 15291 Cascade Lane President/CEO Huntington Beach Tomorrow HB Chamber of Commerce President Huntington Beach CA 92647 2134 Main Street PO Box 865 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 2 9 HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc. of Realtors Environmental Board Chair President Dave Stefanides Robert Smith 2134 Main St. Ste. 100 25552 La Paz Road 21352 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 6 7 8 . Building Industry Assoc. of South Calif. SCAG ETI: Corral 100 Attn: Elyse Sminada, Govt. Affairs Asst. Richard Spicer Jean Kimbrell 17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 170 Irvine, CA 92614 818 West 7th, 12th Floor 20292 Eastwood Circle Los Angeles, CA 90017 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 11 12 17 Matrix Environmental Rutan& Tucker, LLP Kirsten Berg Attn: Shawn Gauer, Senior Planner Jeffrey M. Oderman 18870 Kithira Circle 6701 Center Drive West 4900 611 Anton Blvd., 14th Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1950 13 14 19 Newland House Museum Historic Resources Board Chair O.C.Resources&Develop. Mgt. Dept. Pres., H.B. Historical Society Barbara Haynes Bryan Speegle 19820 Beach Blvd. 19341 Worchester Lane P.O.Box 4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 20 21 22 City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley City of Newport Beach Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director P.O. Box 1200 10200 Slater Ave. P.O. Box 1768 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Newport Beach, CA 92663-8915 23 24 25 City of Westminster City of Seal Beach California Coastal Commission Theresa Henry Planning Director Planning Director South coast Area Office 8200 Westminster Blvd. 211 Eighth St. 200 Oceangate, 1 Oth Floor Westminster, CA 92683 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 25 26 30 California Coastal Commission Department of Transportation, Dist. 12 HB City Elementary School Dist. South Coast Area Office Clu•istopher Herre, Branch Chief Gregg Haulk, Superintendent I 200 Oceangate, 1 Oth Floor 333 Michelson Dr., Suite 380 20451 Craimer Lane Long Beach, CA 92802-4302 rvine, CA 92612-1699 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 29 29 30 Fountain Valley Elem. School Dist. Fountain Valley Elem. School Dist. HB City Elementary School Dist. Marc Ecker Rina Lucchese, Executive Assistant John Archiald 10055 Slater Avenue 10055 Slater Avenue 20451 Craimer Lane Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 M �r/7� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 / /'/— Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 v 0900915®fanny oane algjjedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ j1;wiol op 9119nbll3 0918/09l-50ti9ny qj!m 9lq!jedwo0„g/g Z x,,L azls laqul gm 142-072-02&03 1-2 142-072-08 3 142-073-01,11,15,142-074-01,02,03, 4-17 SCHOOL COAST COMMUNITY FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 07,08,09,10,11,142-311-02, 142-315-01-02 2701 FAIRVIEW RD 15851 GOTHARD ST SO CALIF EDISON CO COSTA MESA CA 92626 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 2244 WALNUT GROVE ROSEMEAD CA 91771 142-073-02 18 142-073-03, 142-074-13, 19-22 142-073-14&23 23-24 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT 142-473-01,142-311-34 BELLA TERRA M ASSOCIATES 11222 ACACIA PKWY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1332 ANACAPA ST #200 GARDEN GROVE CA 92840 PO BOX 190 SANTA BARBARA CA 93101 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 142-073-26&30 25-26 142-073-31, 142-342-16,17 27-29 142-074-04 30 BTDJM PHASE II ASSOC BELLA TERRA ASSOCIATES FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 7777 EDINGER AVE 60 S MARKET ST #1120 300 CROSSWAYS PARK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 SAN JOSE CA 95113 WOODBURY NY 11797 142-074-06& 12 31-32 142-263-05 33 142-263-06 34 ARCHSTONE HUNTINGTON BCH SUSAN BESSETTE GARY GONZALES 3 MACARTHUR PL #6TH 15281 CASCADE LN 15291 CASCADE LN SANTA ANA CA 92707 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-263-07 35 142-263-08 36 142-263-09 37 GEORGE FAJARDO REBECCA CHRISTENSEN RICHARD AUSTIN 15301 CASCADE LN 15311 CASCADE LN 15321 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 j 142-263-10 38 142-263-11 39 142-263-12 40 DELLAMARIE BONOMO JUAN MENDOZA VAN LE DOAN 15331 CASCADE LN 15341 CASCADE LN 15351 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-263-13 41 142-263-14 42 142-264-02 43 MATTHEW TRAN FASHION HOMES INC SHARON JOHNSON 15361 CASCADE LN 511 S BROOKHURST RD j 15282 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 FULLERTON CA 92833 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-264-03 44 142-264-04 45 142-264-05 46 STANLEY PERRY CHAU&DAO NGUYEN KENNETH OBITZ 15292 CASCADE LN 15312 CASCADE LN 15332 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-264-06 47 142-264-07 48 142-264-08 49 SEAN SMALL JOHN DONALDSON RONNIE MONDRAGON 15342 CASCADE LN 15352 CASCADE LN 15362 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-264-09 50 142-264-10 51 142-264-11 52 TONY TANG MICHAEL SICKELS ELAINE LE 15311 SHASTA LN 15301 SHASTA LN 15291 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 65160/8160 kiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0919/09 L9®[i1aAy oeAa egI-edwoo ww Zq x ww cZ lauaaol ap GI anb113 09[9/091-9®Many gjIm algllcdwoo„2/9 Z x azls lagcl 142-264-12 53 142-264-13 54 142-265-06 55 GARY ERICKSON OBERT TRUST DOUGLAS DRONEY 15281 SHASTA LN 15271 SHASTA LN 15322 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-265-07 56 142-264-08 57 142-264-09 58 AURORA LN SVCS LLC HENRY CHIANG MICHAEL MANASA 10350 PARK MEADOWS DR 15342 SHASTA LN 15352 SHASTA LN LITTLETON CO 80124 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-264-10 59 142-271-04 60 142-271-05 61 BOOSTEN TRUST ESS VRS OWNR LLC JOHN WICKSTOM 15362 SHASTA LN PO BOX 320099 3924 ELM AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ALEXANDRIA VA 22320 LONG BEACH CA 90807 142-272-01 62 142-272-02 63 142-272-03 64 JANET BEAUMONT ROY HANSEN THUC NGUYEN 15371 CASCADE LN 15381 CASCADE LN 15391 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-272-04 65 142-272-0 5 66 142 272 06 67 MARGARET JOLLEY DAVID&TAWNIE SAMSON PHILIP&ABELLA GEHHAR 15401 CASCADE LN 15411 CASCADE LN 9190 POPPY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-272-07 68 142-272-08 69 142-272-09 70 CWMBS INC TRUST MIGUEL RAMIREZ KEITH GUTHRIE ]5431 CASCADE LN 15441 CASCADE LN 16202 BIMINI LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 142-272-10 71 142-273-01 72 142-273-02 73 DAVID DIPOLO WALTER NEWELL ANDREE LINNAR 15461 SHASTA LN PO BOX 7206 15382 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92607 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-273-03 74 14 -2 -2 73 04 75 142-273-05 76 LUIS VILLEGAS GLORIA BARRETO SCOTT MOSES 2939 PINOT AVE 15402 CASCADE LN 15412 CASCADE LN SPRINGDALE AR 72764 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-273-06 77 142-273-07 78 142-273-08 79 LANE FAMILY RAFAELO PAPALE LONNIE REYNOLDS 15422 CASCADE LN 15401 SHASTA LN 15381 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-273-09 80 142-273-10 81 142-273-11 82 JEREMY ESCOBAR DANIEL MILES DANIEL LOOMER 15361 SHASTA LN 15351 SHASTA LN 15341 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i ' label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Ave °5160/8160 Q Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 m compatible a ec Avery 05160/8160 09L8/0919,D AJGAV a9AP alq!lpdwoa ww Lg x ww 9Z jewjol ap a149nbl13 09L9/0915®fuaAV qj!m algllpdwoo ,9/9 Z x«L azls lagpi ' 142-273-12 83 142-273-13 84 142-274-01 85 RODNEY MERINO STEPHEN AMUNDSON ERIC CHARLONNE 18082 BRENTWELL CIR 15321 SHASTA LN 1097 GLEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92627 142-274-02 86 142-274-03 87 142-274-04 88 DARIN RAVSTEN BRADLEY KERR HOVANNES DANIELS 15382 SHASTA LN 15392 SHASTA LN 6161 HAMSHIRE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-274-05 89 142-274-06 90 142-274-07 91 FAMIHIRO MAFUNE LILLIAN PRATHER DENISE DELANEY 15412 SHASTA LN 7396 SIENA DR 15432 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-274-08 92 142-274-09 93 142-274-10 94 RUTH PIERCE BEVERLY SCHMIDT RICHARD PHELAN 24801 CAMINO VILLA 7651 SUGAR DR 7661 SUGAR DR LAKE FOREST CA 92630 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-274-11 95 142-274-12 96 142-274-13 97 THUY NGUYEN WILLIAM KONTRA LAWRENCE GARCIA 7681 SUGAR DR 15451 RUSHMOOR LN 15431 RUSHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I � 142-274-14 98 1142-274-15 99 142-274-16 100 JOHN WINNERS LAUREN PHAN MACHON DAUGHTREY 15421 RUSHMOOR LN 15381 RUSHMOOR LN 11152 WALLINGSFORD RD 47A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 I . 142-274-17 101 142-303-01 102 142-303-02 103 HING HUANG FREDERICK MUESEGAS MAURICE IBARRA 17645 HEVER CIR 7332 SIENA AVE 7322 SIENA AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-303-03 104 142-303-21 105 142-303-22 106 DONALD CROSBY GREGORY REESE RICHARD YING 7312 SIENA AVE 7301 EMERSON AVE 7311 EMERSON AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-303-23 107 142-303-24 108 142-304-01 109 K DEAGLE ELIZABETH HOANG TIMOTHY CURTIS 7321 EMERSON AVE 7331 EMERSON AVE 7332 EMERSON AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-304-02 110 142-304-03 111 142-304-04 112 ROBERT CREAMER ALBERT NGUYEN DIEU XUONG LY 7322 EMERSON AVE 7312 EMERSON AVE 7302 EMERSON AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Lauette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 v 09 1-2/09190 haaAV oaAe alglledwoo tutu Zg x ww 9Z Iewaol op allanbll3 09G8/09G9®A1aAd gjIm alglledwoo„8/9 Z x«G azls lapel ° 142-303-05 113 142-304-20 114 142-304-21 115 MOHAMMAD ASMAR IRIS DOIRON NGHIA PHAM 7292 EMERSON AVE 7291 ROCKMONT AVE 7301 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-304-22 116 142-304-23 117 142-304-24 118 MIRIAM SPENCER SEYMOUR KAGAN CAROL COSKRAN 7311 ROCKMONT AVE 7321 ROCKMONT AVE 5731 MARSHALL DR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 142-305-01 119 142-305-02 120 142-305-03 121 HUNG NGUYEN LOUIS MIKELSON BARBARA WHITE 7332 ROCKMONT 1602 E 4T11 ST 7312 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 SANTA ANA CA 92701 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-305-04 122 142-305-05 123 142-305-06 124 ANDREW NGUYEN KHIET NGUYEN SANDRA HOLCOMB '11302 ROCKMONT AVE 7292 ROCKMONT AVE 7282 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-311-11 125 142-311-12 126 142-311-13 127 MARTIN FUCHS THAO VO TERRY KISHIMOTO 15201 VERMONT ST 7411 COLBY CIR 7421 COLBY CIR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 1 142-311-14 128 142-311-15 129 142-311-16 t30 GARY HAYCOCK SOLOMON VIRGIL LILLIE DOBSON 7431 COLBY CIR 7432 COLBY CIR 500 N SLOAN AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 COMPTON CA 90221 142-311-17 131 142-311-18 132 142-311-19 133 GEORGE MOLLIS RONALD MENDONCA CASSIE MENDONCA 7412 COLBY CIR 15392 VERMONT ST 15392 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-311-20 134 142-311-21 135 142-311-22 136 RAY SHACKLEFORD DAVID SANCHEZ MEDARDO DE LA CRUZ 15442 VERMONT ST 39704 KEILTY CT 15462 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 MURRIETA CA 92563 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-311-23 137 142-311-24 138 142-311-25 139 EARL&MARIANNE KAY JUANITA HARRIS TREVOR&SUSANA HOLLOWAY 15472 VERMONT ST 15482 VERMONT ST 15492 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-313-01 140 142-313-02 141 142-313-03 142 HUGO ARNWINE TIMOTHY&JANET CONDON TIN N VU 15341 VERMONT ST 15361 VERMONT ST 15371 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 I label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 A 1/—(�d:�` - Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160l8160 09l•8/09 Gg®AaaAV oaAe a!glledwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewaol ap 9:49nbl13 09 G8/091g®tiaAV ul!m olgfledwoo u8/g Z x,,l az!s lapel 142-313-04 143 142-313-05 144 142-313-06 145 GIOVANNI GIOVINE VIGINIA CLARK GUNTHER VON WIELAND 15381 VERMONT ST 15401 VERMONT ST 15411 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-313-07 146 142-313-08 147 142-313-09 148 EMILIO MIRABAL GERALD ROBERTSON MICHAEL&ANDREA PADILLA 15421 VERMONT ST 15431 VERMONT ST 15441 VERMONT ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 i 142-313-10 149 r 142-313-11 150 142-313-12 151 HARRY LEE GERALD GREGORY DICK AMEN 15451 VERMONT ST 7371 ROCKMONT AVE 7361 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 i 142-313-13 152 142-313-14 153 142-313-15 154 EARL FRENCH DAN SMITH ROBERT CANTY 7351 ROCKMONT AVE 7352 EMERSON AVE 7362 EMERSON WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-313-16 155 142-313-17 156 142-313-18 157 KEITH WEATHERS MARIA HERNANDEZ KATHLEEN ARNOLD 15412 DE PAUL ST 15402 DE PAUL ST 15392 DE PAUL ST WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 i 142-313-19 158 142-313-20 159 142-314-01 160 MARIAN SCHWARTZ CLAIR BEE GWENDOLYN HEFLEY 15382 DE PAUL ST 15362 DE PAUL ST 7412 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 %I 142-314-02 161 142-314-03 162 142-314-04 163 RAYMOND RATINOFF JAN SAKERT ORLANDO ROQUE 7402 ROCKMONT AVE 7392 ROCKMONT AVE 7382 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 I 142-314-05 164 142-314-06 165 142-314-07 166 ROBERT SANDERS MARY GIBSON RACHEL WELCH 7372 ROCKMONT AVE 7362 ROCKMONT AVE 7352 ROCKMONT AVE WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 I 142-341-29 167 142-342-14 168 142-342-15 169 TONYA CAMPO 7677 CENTER AVE LP BELLA TERRA OFFICE 7736 SUGAR DR 610 N SANTA ANITA AVE 7767 CENTER AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ARCADIA CA 91006 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-18 170 142-471-01 171 142-472-02 172 MING KOU CENTER MEDICAL BUILDING WB-NNC SEAWIND OWNER 1912 E VERNON AVE 1880 CENTURY PARK E#810 3001 E CAMELBACK RD#160 VERNON CA 90058 LOS ANGELES CA 90067 PHOENIX AZ 85016 / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ` ' �l 7/�� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 L8/09 Lq®Aaany oane algi}edwoo ww Lg x ww gZ lewaol ap 91janbll3 09L8/09Lq®tiany qm alglledwoo„8/9 Z x„L azls label ME 142-472-03 173 142-472-04 174 142-474-01 175 OLD WORLD OWNERS ASSN WEST COAST SOCCER LEAGUE CYNDIE KASKO 23046 AVENIDA DE LA CARLOTA 7561 CENTER AVE #49 7561 CENTER AVE #1 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-02 176 142-474-03 177 142-474-04 178 BERN BISCHOF JOSEF BISCHOF BILL DE CARR 8165 PRESTWICK CIR 7561 CENTER AVE #3 25572 SADDLE ROCK PL HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 142-474-05 179 142-474-06 180 142-474-07 181 DENNIS RICH WARE FAMILY QUAN HUYNH 323 LLOYDEN PARK LN 16502 GRIMAUD LN 7561 CENTER AVE #7 ATHERTON CA 94027 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA. 92647 142-474-08 182 142-474-09 183 142-474-10 184 MARCEL CHATAL JAMES BURGARD FRANK JANSEN 7561 CENTER AVE #8 7521 DANUBE DR 2345 CORNEL.L DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 COSTA MESA CA 92626 142-474-11 185 142-474-12 186 142-474-13 187 MY HUYNH KENNETH KLING GARTH MURPHY 7561 CENTER AVE, 411 7561 CENTER AVE #12 1767 W ORANGE AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ANAHEIM CA 92804 i 142-474-14 188 142-474-15 189 142-474.16 190 PHILIP LARSCHAN FLORA THOMAS DARYL WISE 9801 KINGS CANYON DR 637 PALM DR 4243 WILSON TOWN RD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 GLENDALE CA 91202 LINCOLN CA 95648 142-474-17&27 191-192 142-474-18 193 142-474-19&20 194-195 ROSEMARIE HASKETT GENE GOLTZ MANFRED ESCHENBURG 4179 ANDROS CIR 7561 CENTER AVE #18 7561 CENTER AVE #19 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I' - 142-474-21 196 142-474-22 197 142-474-23 198 FREEDMAN ENTS LLC VERNA WISE ROBERT MORRILL 123 GOLDENROD 7561 CENTER AVE #22 7561 CENTER AVE #23 IRVINE CA 92614 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-24 199 142-474-25 200 142-474-26 201 IRWIN WEISS GLENN CARTER FRANK&GERTRUDE DRESCHSLER 7561 CENTER AVE #24 7561 CENTER AVE #25 7561 CENTER AVE #26 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-28 202 142-474-29 203 142-474-30 204 G VALENTIN PEREZ HOWARD BOULTER DOLORES EITL.EMAN 7561 CENTER AVE #28 17092 SANDRA LEE LN #C 7561. CENTER AVE 930 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ` Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 C�/ 0912/09150 Auany Dane alglladwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Iawaol ap a4anbi13 0918/0915®fuanV qj!m elgiladwoo ,8/9 Z x<<1 azls lapel a 142-474-31 205 142-474-32 206 142-474-33 207 JAVID MOSADEGHI YVONNE ROFER SO CAL PRIME PROPERTIES 15 S HOPE AVE 18433 SANTA YOLANDA CIR 7561 CENTER AVE #33 SANTA BARBARA CA 93105 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-34 208 142-474-35 209 142-474-36 210 ROY SMITH MICHELE WEISS URSEL PETERMANN 113 IOTH ST 7561 CENTER AVE #35 7561 CENTER AVE #36 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-37&38 211-212 142-474-39 213 142-474-40 214 EMILE ERBACHER CHRISTI FABISIAK HELEN GELBARD 9775 CONSTITUTION DR 7561 CENTER AVE 939 263 MERTON AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 GLEN ELLYN IL 60137 142-474-41 215 i 142-474-42 216 i 142-474-43 217 DONNA PLACE RAMI FARR AMER MASRI 6475 E PACIFIC COAST HWY#384 7561 CENTER AVE #42 21 CROCKETT LONG BEACH CA 90803 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 IRVINE CA 92620 i 142-474-44 218 142-474-45 219 142-474-46 220 HEDWIG MILLER BRUNO HEIDENWAG EXXAT MIKHAIL 7561 CENTER AVE #51 27363 EASTVALE RD 6804 W OCEANFRONT HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 PALOS VERDES ESTATES CA 90274 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663 142-474-47 221 142-474-48 222 142-474-49 223 HELGA KAISER JAMES WANG WEST COAT SOCCER LEAGUE 949 ORCHARD AVE 16391 WISHINGWELL LN 7561 CENTER AVE #49 MOSCOW ID 83843 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-50 224 142-474-51 225 142-474-52 226 AMER MASRI ALLEN KLING PAUL HUYNH 21 CORKETT 7561 CENTER AVE #52 411 DELAWARE ST IRVINE CA 92620 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 I ® label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/0919®AaaAV oane alglledwoo ww Lq x ww cZ lewaoj ap 914anbll3 09 1.9/09[90[uaAV UIIM alglledwoo„g/g Z x G azls lagel 142-072-02 1 142-072-08 3 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15744 GOLDENWEST ST 15861 GOTHARD ST 7777 EDINGER AVE #120 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #180 7777 EDINGER AVE #210 7777 EDINGER AVE #220 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #230 7777 EDINGER AVE #240 7777 EDINGER AVE #250 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT j 7777 EDINGER AVE #260 7777 EDINGER AVE #280 7777 EDINGER AVE #300 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #350 7777 EDINGER AVE #375 7777 EDINGER AVE #400 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #405 7777 EDINGER AVE #430 7777 EDINGER AVE 9440 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #500 7777 EDINGER AVE #520 ! 7777 EDINGER AVE #530 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ji 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 142-073-14,23,26,31 23-24,25,27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT ! OCCUPANT 7777 EDINGER AVE #600 7777 EDINGER AVE #650 7777 EDINGER AVE #690 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-16 28 142-342-16 28 142-342-16 28 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7711 CENTER AVE #100 7711 CENTER AVE #200 7711 CENTER AVE #201 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-16 28 142-342-16 28 i 142-342-16 28 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7711 CENTER AVE #225 7711 CENTER AVE #250 7711 CENTER AVE #300 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 kirmatte tle format 25 mm x 67 mm comnatible aver Avery(35160/8160 - 091.9/091.5®Aj9AV oane alglledwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z Iewaol ap allanbi13 091-8/09 L90 LuanV Minn algiledwoo„g/g Z x«L azls lagel 142-342-16 28 142-342-16 28 142-342-16 28 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7711 CENTER AVE #400 7711 CENTER AVE #550 7711 CENTER AVE #600 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647, HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT j 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 J 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # 7755 CENTER AVE # HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i i 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#100 7755 CENTER AVE.,#290 7755 CENTER AVE.,#300 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342_17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#400 7755 CENTER AVE.,#600 7755 CENTER AVE.,#605 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT ! I OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#610 7755 CENTER AVE.,#620 7755 CENTER AVE.,4670 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#680 7755 CENTER AVE.,#700 7755 CENTER AVE.,#750 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �� 0 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery/35160/8160 0918/09l g®faany oaAe agledwoo ww Zq x ww gZ lewaol ap a4anbll3 09 GS/09l.g®AaaAV gIIM agledwoo<,S/g Z x,,l azls laqel 142-342-17 29 142.342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#800 7755 CENTER AVE.,#1010 7755 CENTER AVE.,#1020 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 142-342-17 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7755 CENTER AVE.,#1030 7755 CENTER AVE.,#1100 7755 CENTER AVE.,#1200 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i j 142-074-04 30 142-074-06 31 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7441 EDINGER AVE 7368 CENTER AVE 7400 CENTER AVE #100 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #102 7400 CENTER AVE #103 7400 CENTER AVE #104 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #105 7400 CENTER AVE #106 7400 CENTER AVE #107 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #108 7400 CENTER AVE #109 7400 CENTER AVE #110 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #111 7400 CENTER AVE #112 7400 CENTER AVE #113 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #114 7400 CENTER AVE #115 7400 CENTER AVE #200 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #201 7400 CENTER AVE #202 7400 CENTER AVE #203 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #204 7400 CENTER AVE #205 7400 CENTER AVE #206 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 • �/ 7 �� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 v/� 09 L8/09 L9®AaaAV oane agledwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z lewaol ap allanbil3 09L8109L9®/uaAV uIIM ajglledwoo„8/9 Z x«L azls lagel 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #207 7400 CENTER AVE #208 7400 CENTER AVE #209 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #210 7400 CENTER AVE #211 7400 CENTER AVE #212 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #213 7400 CENTER AVE #214 7400 CENTER AVE #215 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-074-12 32 142-074-12 32 142-265-07 56 OCCUPANT ! OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7400 CENTER AVE #216 7400 CENTER AVE #217 15332 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-271-04 60 142-271-05 61 142-272-06 67 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7531 MCFADDEN AVE 7501 MCFADDEN AVE 15421 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-272-09 70 142-273-01 72 142-273-03 74 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15451 CASCADE LN 15372 CASCADE LN 15392 CASCADE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-273-12 83 142-274-01 8.5 142-274-04 88 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15331 SHASTA LN 15372 SHASTA LN 15402 SHASTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ! i 142-274-06 90 142-274-08 92 142-274-15 99 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15422 SHASTA LN 15452 SHASTA LN 15411 RUSHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-274-16 100 142-274-17 101 142-304-24 118 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15401 RUSHMOOR LN 15391 RUSHMOOR LN 7331 ROCKMONT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 142-305-02 120 142-311-11 125 142-311-16 130 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7322 ROCKMONT AVE 15342 VERMONT ST 7422 COLBY CIR WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 1.9/09 G9@�JGAV oane a1g11edwoo ww Zq x ww 5Z lewiol ap a4anbi13 09 G8/091.5®faany qj!m a1g11edwoo„g/g Z x„G azls lagel 142-311-19 133 142-311-21 135 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15422 VERMONT ST 15452 VERMONT ST 7677 CENTER AVE #100 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 WESTMINSTER CA 92683 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #200 7677 CENTER AVE 9201 7677 CENTER AVE #202 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #203 7677 CENTER AVE #204 7677 CENTER AVE #205 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #206 7677 CENTER AVE #207 7677 CENTER AVE #208 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #209 7677 CENTER AVE #210 7677 CENTER AVE #211 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #212 7677 CENTER AVE #300 7677 CENTER AVE #301 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #302 7677 CENTER AVE #303 7677 CENTER AVE #304 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #305 7677 CENTER AVE #400 7677 CENTER AVE #401 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 OCCUPANT ! OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE 4402 7677 CENTER AVE #403 7677 CENTER AVE #404 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-342-14 168 142-342-14 168 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7677 CENTER AVE #405 7677 CENTER AVE #406 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 /! ) label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 4\ Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 0516 0/8160 v 09 G9/09 LS®faany oane alglledwoo ww L9 x ww SZ lewaol ap 9:49nbll3 09L8/09 LS®Many uIIM alglledwoo«8/S Z x«L azls lagel ° 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#2 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#3 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#4 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#5 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#6 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#7 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 it 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#8 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#9 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#10 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT ! OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#11 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#12 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#13 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 - -142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142 472 02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#14 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#15 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#16 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 417 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 418 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#19 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#20 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#21 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 422 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 423 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#24 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#25 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#26 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#27 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#28 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#29 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#30 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#31 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 ® ��7 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/®160 /�� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 5160/8160 / 09 L8/09 L90 A1any oane alglledwoo ww Zg x ww gZ lewiol op allanb43 a 09L8/09L9®Many ql!m alglledwoo„g/g Z x,,[azls lagel 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 432 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#33 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#34 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#35 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 436 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#37 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#38 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#39 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#40 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#41 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#42 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#43 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#44 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#45 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#46 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 J 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#47 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 448 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#49 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#50 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#51 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#52 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#53 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#54 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#55 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#56 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#57 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#58 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#59 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#60 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#61 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 / label size 1 ff x 2 5/8ff compatible with Avery 05160/8160 l 7�� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 v 09 009190 AaaAV aaAe afg1ledwoo ww Lg x ww 5Z lewiol ap 91lanbi13 09 L8/09 L90 fuaAV u11M e1Q11edwoo«S/9 Z x,,L azls lagel ° 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#62 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#63 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#64 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#65 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#66 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#67 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#68 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#69 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 470 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 j 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#71 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#72 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#73 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I' 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#74 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#75 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#76 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-472-02 172 42-472-02 4 - - 2 172 1 172 12 472 0 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#77 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#78 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#79 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 480 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#81 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#82 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#83 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#84 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#85 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#86 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#87 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#99 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#89 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#90 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#91 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 o / label size V x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 � l �` Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09G9/091.5®[uany MAL algilndwoo ww�q x ww R luwjof ap 914anbll] 09 L8/0915®fjaAV uIIM algllndwoo„g/g Z x u 1,azls lagnl an ' 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#92 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#93 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#94 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#95 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#96 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#97 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#98 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#99 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#100 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT id OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#101 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#102 I5555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#103 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#104 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#105 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#106 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i i 142-472-02 172 j 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#107 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#108 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#110 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#I I 1 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4112 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#113 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#114 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#1 15 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#116 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#117 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#118 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 1' 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#119 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#120 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4121 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 m /7 /4� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 /, _�6,� �—1 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 LJ 0918/09 L9®AjaAV 09M algl edwoa ww Lg x ww gZ jewjo}ap aganb43 0918/09L9®1uaAV uIIM alq!jed aoa„g/g Z x„G azls lagal 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#122 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#123 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#124 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#125 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#126 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#127 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#128 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#129 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4130 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#131 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#132 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#.133 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#134 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#135 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#136 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#137 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#138 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#139 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#140 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#141 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#142 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#143 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#144 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#145 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#146 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#147 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#148 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#149 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#150 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#151 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 o / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 17 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery/55160/8160 0918/09 G9®NaAV oaAe aigiledwoo ww Zq x ww 9Z lewaof ep auanbi13 09L8/0919®Many ul!M aigiledwoo,$/9 Z x j azis iagel ° 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4152 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4153 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#154 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#155 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#156 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#157 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4158 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#159 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#160 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#161 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#162 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#163 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#164 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4165 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#166 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I r 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#167 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#168 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#169 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#170 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#171 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#172 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#173 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#174 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#175 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#176 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#177 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#178 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#179 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#180 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#181 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 i /7/X,,; label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 (J 09�9/09190(JGAV oaAe 91Q11edwoo ww Zg x ww 93 Iewjo}ap al9nbll3 09�9/09G90(uaAV u1IM algiledwoo„g/9 Z x«j azls label 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#182 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#183 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#184 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#185 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#186 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#187 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#188 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#189 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#190 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#191 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#192 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#193 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#194 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#195 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#196 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 it 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#197 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#198 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#199 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#200 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#201 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#202 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#203 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#204 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#205 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#206 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#207 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#208 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#209 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#210 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#211 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I 1�//1 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery o5160/8160 ��_�Q ` ° / \ Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery o5160/8160 09 G8/09 G90 AaanV oaA-e alglledwoo ww Lg x ww gZ luwaol op 9j;anb113 09 L8/091g®hdanV u11M algl}udwoo„919 Z x,j azls lagel 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4212 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4213 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4214 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#215 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#216 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#217 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 j 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#218 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4219 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#220 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#221 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#222 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#223 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#224 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#225 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#226 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4227 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#228 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#229 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#230 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#231 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#232 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 I , 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#233 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#234 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#235 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#236 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#237 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#238 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#239 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#240 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#241 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 /—7 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/0160 l Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 5160/8160 09 1-8/09190 4JGAV oane alglledwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z Iewao;ap 9490113 09G2/09G9®k9AV ql!m alglledwoo ,8/9 Z x«L azls iagel 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#242 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#243 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4244 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#245 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#246 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#247 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#248 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#249 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#250 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#251 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#252 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 9253 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#254 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#255 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#256 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#257 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#258 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#259 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4260 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN 4261 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#262 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#263 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#264 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#265 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#266 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#267 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#268 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#269 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#270 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#271 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery @5160/81.60 _ �� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 0919/09 G9®faanV oane a1g11edwoo ww Zq x ww 5Z lewaol ap all9nbl13 0919/09G9®7u9nV ql!m @lq!ledwoo«8/9 Z x«L azls lagel 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#272 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#273 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#274 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 142-472-02 172 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#275 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#276 15555 HUNTINGTON VILLAGE LN#277 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-472-04 174 142-474-02 176 142-474-04 178 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #R 7561 CENTER AVE #2 7561 CENTER AVE #4 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-05 179 142-474-06 180 142-474-09 183 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #5 7561 CENTER AVE #6 7561 CENTER AVE #9 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-10 184 142-474-13 187 142-474-14 188 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #10 7561 CENTER AVE #13 7561 CENTER AVE #14 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-15 189 142-474-16 190 142-474-17 191 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE 415 7561 CENTER AVE #16 7561 CENTER AVE #17 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-27 192 142-474-21 196 142-474-29 203 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #27 7561 CENTER AVE #21 7561 CENTER AVE #29 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-31 205 142-474-32 206 142-474-34 208 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #31 7561 CENTER AVE #32 7561 CENTER AVE #34 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-37 211 142-474-38 212 142-474-40 214 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #37 7561 CENTER AVE #38 7561 CENTER AVE #40 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-41 215 142-474-43 217 142-474-45 219 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #41 7561 CENTER AVE #43 7561 CENTER AVE #Z HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 �� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 � �� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09[8/0915o Nang oaAe 9gledwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z lewiol ap 91190113 091.8/09150(uaAV g11PA alglledwoo,,8/5 Z x«1 azls label 142-474-46 220 142-474-47 221 142-474-48 222 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #46 7561 CENTER AVE #47 7561 CENTER AVE #48 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-50 224 142-474-52 226 142-474-44 218 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #50 7561 CENTER AVE #53 7561 CENTER AVE #44A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 142-474-44 218 142-474-44 218 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 7561 CENTER AVE #44B 7561 CENTER AVE #44C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 86160/8160 11M, Printed by:01502 Patricia Gamin Apr 19,2012,11:15 am `& salesperson: Phone: Ad 0 3495914* (714)536-5227 h;Stan datEt 0446-12 I x 121340 City Of Huntington Beach(Parent) Gl-26-12 led'me 12-00 TCN Inch Add ' PO Box 784 "wrd Uegal Huntington Beach Huntington Beac,CA 92648 Liner 0602 Patkia'Garni ino pe, CU00070479 k;: i� GiaSS 000-Legal Notices $96;00 TCN HBI 9600 r CI Brit City Of Huntington Beach-Clerk s 00 acted Patty Esparza 14)374-1557 W Mess wauharctrg Ad Copy: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE M CITY CONCI OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, May 7,2012,at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: 0 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1111- 0 02/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 11- 002 (SKATE PARK PROJECT)Applicant:VF Outdoor, Inc. Property Owner- City of Hun- tington Beach Request; GPA. To amend the Housing Element: 1) to remove the reference to the project site on Page IV-16;2) to remove Site #5 from Table IV-7(Sites for Potential Rezoning to Exclusively Residential Use)on Page IV-17; and 3) to remove the dis- cussion of Site #5 on Page IV-18. ZTA: To amend the Beach and Edinger Corridors Spe- cific Plan to remove the "Residential Required" designation (yellow dashed lines) from the subject property. Loca- tion: 7461 Center Ave- nue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (2.7-acre vacant site an Center Avenue, approximately 500 ft. east of Gothard Street)Project Planner: Tess Nguyen NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the proposed amendments are cov- ered by Environmental Impact Report No. 10- 009, approved by the Planning Commission on March 27,2012, EIR No, --- ad proof pg.1 --- GLAS,- a Printed by:0602 Patricia Gamino w Apr 19,2012,11:15am . 1ugi> s�Ita¢s Sal eVe Ad i1 aasssla2 j. Anger Phone: ri 10-009 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 20DO Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Depart- ment, or telephoning (714)536.5271. ON FRE-A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Hun- tington Beach,California 92648, for inspection by the public.A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday,May 3,20, 2. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above.If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence deliv- ered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.If there are any further questions,please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,Cali- fornia 92648 714-536-5227 httpJ/huntuWonbeach ca.gov/HBPubkcComments/ Published H.B.Indepen- dent April 26,2012 --- ad proof pg.2 ---