Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Study Session #1 - Supplemental Communication - 2/17/2015 Staff Recommendations Massage Establishments 5.25 HBMC and Zoning Change City Council Study Session February 17, 2015 Background Senate Bill 731 (2008): o Created California Massage Therapy Council o Reduced local government regulatory authority over massage establishments and established the CAMTC. 2009 Huntington Beach Amendments: o Modified Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code to comply with state law. o From 2009 to 2013, number of massage establishments increased from 9 to over 50. o Overwhelmingly, the increase has been illici establishments acting as brothels. OMMUNICATION A 55� 1 2/17/2015 Background 2013 Huntington Beach Amendments: o Added more restrictions to massage establishments. o Despite changes, the number of massage establishments is now over 70 (and still growing). What's Changed - California Assembly Bill 1147: ! o Oversight by the CAMTC has proven to be inadequat and ineffective. X= o The changes in this bill were the result of considerable effort by a multitude of municipal staff members from across the state as well as Huntington Beach, the California League of Cities Staff and state legislators. :T s - o New statute will allow local government more control over massage establishments which will aid with enforcement and prevention of illicit massage establishments. 2 2/17/2015 What is an "Illicit Massage Establishment' o Massage is a legitimate profession with many professional therapists working in the field. Illicit Massage Establishment: o Massage therapists perform sexual services for money. o Workers are potential human trafficking victims. The Problem Large increase in illicit massage establishments: 0 700% growth since 2009. o The concern is not that "massage establishments" are opening, the concern is that many are brothels , affect good businesses, affect Health & Safety, and provide a negative image to the city. o Illicit massage establishments have been shown to be involved in human trafficking. 1�w MOM 2/17/2015 The Problem PD enforcement effective but limited o Massage owner applicants are only required to provide minimal information. o When civil charges are filed against a business owner, the business will simply change owners and/or move to another location in the city. o City Attorney can declare the location a public nuisance, but the business will often move to another locatio under a new name and owner in the city. . Public Safety Resources .� Prior to 2008 when HB had 9 Massage Establishments o PD had 4 Vice Detectives and a Supervisor. �4 Today with 70+ Massage Establishments o PD has 2 Vice investigators and share a supervisor with ,4 r 4i4 Crime Task Force Unit. o Resources have been reorganized in an effort to bek more effective with fewer detectives and civilian staff. 4 2/17/2015 Huntington Beach Illicit Massage Advertisements o Illicit Massage Establishment advertisements for Huntington Beach are increasing and are found in multiple websites and other media. Backpage Craigslist Humaniplex OC Weekly o Illicit customers provide their own reviews of Huntington Beach Illicit Massage Establishments as well. Rubmaps Erotic Review Huntington Beach Advertisements in Known Illicit W Grand opening in Huntington Beach-28 Reply:dc1T.,.. McIbJGG'J`•°.NenE sometimes away Yan yqY tlaiy Slurs.Gomaaeaue.our gTrs aA Rry p, f"enel and Nw .- sweabstpanwnueyNl you urelcen Y"Y,ma l n3 guemmaelou*Allharama Castrentse gl8 a7enflrstaeur massap@, also MYa ma bur aeldsscetlel he to tyyou xm&e E.NewEms 'ume+gmn Base.G.92di0 TH:�ee w 9ys soon tliema.JWb •lx.+' Nunmgkn e.ey, �-3 msgg�roue _�- •Post ID:4881a:.7 omrg—W -onxr aea aw mu�.ar: Emeaws - En6mc Pftlue - _ b12 EiWae aiCnm I 1 -t }, EVuae xtm �._ �AdJeittsements show Huntington Beacti°,aS a good location to obtain arcilgc�t 5 2/17/2015 Huntington Beach Advertisements in Known Illicit W Ivir4a )� nnbM anm.�rn�mt�Mxhnih� Brand New,5ensous,Relaxing Release in H.B. Pv4.d'.Frdsy_Odors,i;.2014 1 K NJ Reply:JUk he. Our stunnlrrgly aeautllul.sexy lheraplNa vAl rub you right,put rou Into dreamland and make tie ras,of your day magical-.Clean wrdonable roans br your en"�ove sensua',ma�gsger+aMaNc eep tissue,or hot store mith 100%sdsfacion and pure erjeyment guararaeed.We are located of MOMMEMNku,lirglon 3ooch 50 an hour forf=lima drams..Conf be shy..Opon 10AM-9PM Walkarm arovncom Posmi's ags:2a •Locatbn:Orange County,Orange CouMy,®-IB Pit F. y � Advertisements stiovi Huntin Fon Beach as a ood location to otitam an tlhclt Inassa a,,,,,�_, NM Huntington Beach Advertisements in Known Illicit Websites' * p9 nti Hungton EeaCherademossagepanurs WEU9Ei7 LDgN l CreT �s4f .. crcticmacsaga lavwwc PAsswana:� ry.,T pia NPf F treat e h � ^'• :' '- -` 4 ® _ Gx ErottcHP — VIP Il6ambershlp x T --- € ar uHl I8ea1 a � [ *Can 49 ss erylaeg on roa sls„-•1-•i � N I '� HaFsyseeMa � kC�rm N aatP drta i,,',l C ''r � R Lear -P �ADatR FJOIICNP _- � E of *„a,ell4 drede 1Rareato �� Huivyv,era-h Eiaic kasse¢•PW Iw_.iiaF nn FREE E9 l I araPWurelaemE sar;d Rey M SRMaOevii P k.laa.irdpq lR rep CaWDIIII aoWla ;t l--_ 4 . 1 hlamuoluraMRariawaon Naesasa Puke namhoref 9s Erotic Massage Parlors faun -_ 4 .22 I air�e srAkert;sigsrmn trorc massagt-lununpecn eeacv,.,;saa.massaac htunurgtan dexm Hungnglor beaGl `--._�i----� l!Callramla a s rs RtIDmaFs+`2ar[rl rE5uIr5 tar Huntlrgbn.x=ft In Cat70mla 4as.,y Huntington beach in California-massage parlors-37 "lAdveiUsements show Huntington Beach as a,good location to okiteln an llhcdrhassage �,u_ $, 6 2/17/2015 Proposed New Application Requirements for a Establishment Registration Certificate (ERC) o Diagram of the configuration of the premise. o Information for manager in charge, not just owner. o Acknowledgement from property owner that massage establishment will be located on the property. o If a corporation is the owner/partner, information for board member and stock holders with more than 5% of the stock. , o Any additional information deemed necessary. o Separate application for each owner. ThJse Wll improve background mvestigations'for new own � .,ers toy rvY prevent illicit establishments fromrreopenmg{r Proposed New Conditions On Massag f Establishments o Require Human Trafficking notice be posted as described 52.6 of the Civil Code. o Human Trafficking has many definitions but is basically "modern day slavery". o CAMTC name badges must be worn. o Reduce operating hours from 8AM-11 PM to 9AM-10PM. o Require manager to be on-site during all business hours. o Only owner, employees, and patrons allowed inside business. 7 2/17/2015 Proposed New Conditions On Massa Establishments o Engaging in sexually suggestive advertising related to massage services is forbidden. (AB1147) o Possession of condoms and other adult items forbidden. o Non-Massage staff must wear nametags with true name. o Providing massage of female breasts without the written consent of the person receiving the massage and a referral from a licensed California health care provider.(AB1147) o Alcohol cannot be consumed on the premises. o Modified clothing requirements for massage technicians to match state law. (AB1147) Proposed New Conditions On Massage &_w.� Establishments ,x . o Require the use of professional massage tables only. , o Require privacy notice be posted. o Require a list of all massage services and their cost be posted near the entrance. P o Prohibit anyone from engaging in sexual activity while aE providing massage services for compensation (prevents the boyfriend-girlfriend defense)(AB1147) o Prohibit any transfer of ERC while establishment has any legal issues pending. OEM am 2/17/2015 Proposed New Revocation Conditions o Repeated or ongoing violations will allow for massag permit revocation/suspension. o Increased time property owner is restricted from rentin to a massage establishment from 12 months to 24 months. o Ownership transfer will be frozen while any violations related to the establishment are pending. o Extends reapplication period from 12 months to 24 months after denial or revocation. Existing Zoning Requirements o Massage Establishments: o Classified as Personal Service uses o Permitted by right in all commercial zones (Commercial General (CG), Commercial Office (CO), Commercial Visitor(CV)) o Permitted with a CUP and other use restrictions in Industrial zones o Permitted by right or administratively in seven Specific Plan areas o Most of the 69 existing massage establishments in the City are located in specific plan areas and in the CG Two are located in Industrial zones; none are i CV zones 9 2/17/2015 Proposed Zoning Requirements o Permitted with a CUP subject to Zoning Administrator approval and a public hearin in zones where they are currently permitted or operating: • Commercial (CO/CG/CV) • Industrial (IG/IL) • Specific Plan areas Proposed Zoning Requirements Minimum distance - Massage Esfa6lishmenis _, 0 [ny INu wrgron between massage establishments will Y- be 1,000 feet i o Potential number citywide with 1000 Ft. \ radius: 42 .- ��; LIT -s ti 10 2/17/2015 Proposed Zoning Requirements ti o Amortization Period: o Existing massage establishments have 5 years to comply • Requires notification to business owner/property owner to commence process • CUP must be obtained within this time period • Location criteria must be implemented within , this time period HB Municipal Code/HBZSO o Conclusions: • Illicit massage establishments exist in Huntington Beach and the number is growing. • PD enforcement is effective in temporary closure of business, but they often re-open. • City needs more effective long-term strategy to close existing and prevent new illicit massage establishments. • Amending both the Muni-Code and HBZSO will serve to regulate and limit the number of massage establishments citywide. 11 2/17/2015 Recommended Action Steps o Commence process to amend Chapter 5.24 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Massage Establishments. o Commence process to amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance regulating Massage Establishments. c. �'� �elk o � Questio ns? L v -------....... 12 Respectfully submitted by American Massage Therapy Association -California Chapter CONTACT:Tony Siacotos, Government Relations Chair tony@sanmateocountymassage.com 650-678-0710 Inaccuracies in"FAQs with Regards to Implementation of AB 1147"issued by the League of California Cities, California Police Chiefs Association,California State Association of Counties, and APACA. On December 3, 2014,the above organizations issued a list of"FAA's"in relation to AB 1147, many of which were not accurate. The FAQ document includes a cover letter from the bill's authors and gives an inappropriate air of legitimacy to the FAQ document,even though it contains factual inaccuracies. Inaccuracies in response to Question No. 1: This statement is misleading in that it fails to acknowledge that the discretion of cities and counties to regulate is not unfettered. AB 1147 limits the regulations that cities and counties may impose on massage therapy establishments, as clearly articulated in Business and Professions Code section 460(a)- (b) and Government Code section 51034(c)(1)-(10). Additionally,this response fails to cite to the intent language in Business and Professions Code section 4600.5,which states that the Legislature intends that local governments impose and enforce only"reasonable and necessary fees and regulations" in keeping with existing law and being mindful to protect the needs of legitimate owners and massage professionals, especially sole providers. Inaccuracies in response to Question No.2: The response to Question No. 2 misstates the law. It does not accurately summarize what cities and counties are prohibited from doing,and fails to accurately differentiate between those restrictions that apply to all massage businesses, and those restrictions that apply just to CAMTC certificate holders. Government Code section 51034(c)provides the following: "Nothing contained in this chapter shall authorize a city, county,or city and county to do any of the following: (1) Prohibit a person of one sex from engaging in the massage of a person of the other sex. (2) Define a massage establishment as an adult entertainment business,or otherwise regulate a massage establishment as adult entertainment. (3) Require a massage establishment to have windows or walls that do not extend from the floor to ceiling,or have other internal physical structures, including windows,that interfere with a client's reasonable expectation of privacy. (4) Impose client draping requirements that extend beyond the covering of genitalia and female breasts,or otherwise mandate that the client wear special clothing. (5) Prohibit a massage establishment from locking its external doors if the massage establishment is a business entity owned by one individual with one or no employees or independent contractors. (6) Require a massage establishment to post any notice in an area that may be viewed by clients that contains explicit language describing sexual acts, mentions genitalia, or specific contraception devices. (7) Impose a requirement that a person certified pursuant to Chapter 10.5(commencing with Section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code take any test, medical examination, or background check or comply with education requirements beyond what is required by Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 4600)of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code. (8) Impose a requirement that an individual holding a certificate issued in accordance with Chapter 10.5(commencing with Section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code,obtain any other license, permit, certificate, or other authorization to provide massage 1 for compensation. However,this paragraph shall not be construed to prohibit a city, county,or city and county from requiring by ordinance that a massage business or establishment obtain a license, permit, certificate,or other authorization in order to operate lawfully within the jurisdiction. (9) Impose a dress code requirement on a person certified pursuant to Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code in excess of those already imposed pursuant to paragraph (10) of subdivision (a)of Section 4609 of the Business and Professions Code. (10) Prohibit a person certified pursuant to Chapter 10.5(commencing with Section 4600)of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code from performing massage for compensation on the gluteal muscles, prohibit specific massage techniques recognized by the California Massage Therapy Council as legitimate, or impose any other specific restriction on professional practice beyond those set forth in subparagraph (E)of paragraph (1)of subdivision (a)of Section 4609 of the Business and Professions Code, except as authorized by Section 460 of the Business and Professions Code." (Emphasis added—provisions in bold are missing or misstated in the FAQ response.) Inaccuracies in response to Question No.3: The response to this question misstates the law. The answer should not be, "Yes," it should instead be, "It depends." In accordance with Government Code section 51034(c)(7),cities and counties may not, "Impose a requirement that a person certified pursuant to Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code take any test, medical examination, or background check or comply with education requirements beyond what is required by Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 4600) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code." (Emphasis added.) This section specifically prohibits a city or county from requiring that a CAMTC certified person take a background check. By imposing that requirement on a CAMTC certified business owner,a city or county is violating this provision of the law. Cities and counties are free to require background checks for business owners that are NOT CAMTC certified. Additionally,while there is no disagreement that a city or county can impose a requirement for a business license on an independent contractor or an owner of a massage business,the law does not allow a city or county to impose the requirement for a massage establishment permit or registration with the police for independent contractors or sole providers in certain circumstances. Business and Professions Code section 4601(f)defines a "massage establishment" or"establishment" as a "fixed location where massage is performed for compensation, excluding those locations where massage is only provided on an out-call basis." Government Code section 51034(c)(8) provides that cities and counties may require"by ordinance that a massage business or establishment obtain a license, permit, certificate,or other authorization in order to operate lawfully within the jurisdiction." However, Business and Professions Code section 4600.5(c) makes it clear that cities and counties are only to impose reasonable and necessary fees and regulations. Reading all of these provisions together, it is clear that cities and counties are directed to not impose oppressive and unnecessary requirements for massage establishment permits or registration with the police. In situations where multiple independent contractors are working out of ONE fixed business location,then that is the massage establishment and that is the business that can be required to have a massage establishment permit or register with the police, not each individual working out of that establishment, even if they are each independent contractors or sole providers. 2 Inaccuracies in response to Question No.5: The response to this question fails to point cities and counties towards the legislative intent stated in AB 1147. This response fails to identify the requirement in Business and Professions Code section 4600.5(c) that, "It is the intent of the Legislature that local governments impose and enforce only reasonable and necessary fees and regulations, in keeping with the requirements of existing law and being mindful of the need to protect legitimate business owners and massage professionals, particularly sole providers, during the transition period after this act becomes law and thereafter for the sake of developing a healthy and vibrant local economy." (Emphasis added.) Inaccuracies in response to Question No. 11: The response to this question fails to address all of the relevant sections of the law applicable to caps. Under Business and Professions Code section 460(a), no city or county shall prohibit a person or group of persons certified by CAMTC from engaging in their business,occupation, or profession, or any portion of that business, occupation, or profession. This provision means that cities and counties cannot completely ban CAMTC certificate holders from engaging in the business of massage, impose moratoriums on the massage businesses of CAMTC certificate holders (including stopping them from replacing certificate holders that have left the business or expanding the business), place caps on the number of massage businesses of CAMTC certificate holders in a jurisdiction, nor can a city or county completely ban the provision of outcall massage services or other portions of a massage business engaged in by CAMTC certificate holders without violating this provision of law. Inaccuracies in response to Question No. 18: The response to this question is not complete. Cities and counties are free to ban condoms on the premises of massage businesses as long as that requirement isn't part of a regulation that defines or regulates a massage business as adult entertainment. Regulation of a massage business as adult entertainment would be a violation of the law. Inaccuracies in response to Question No.22: The response to this question misstates the law. Imposing a moratorium on massage businesses violates both the intent and specific statutory language of AB 1147. Business and Professions Code section 4600.5(c) provides that, "It is the intent of the Legislature that local governments impose and enforce only reasonable and necessary fees and regulations, in keeping with the requirements of existing law and being mindful of the need to protect legitimate business owners and massage professionals, particularly sole providers,during the transition period after this act becomes law and thereafter for the sake of developing a healthy and vibrant local economy." (Emphasis added.) Cities and counties have therefore been directed to only impose reasonable and necessary regulations and to protect legitimate businesses. Additionally, under Business and Professions Code section 460(a), no city or county shall prohibit a person or group of persons certified by CAMTC from engaging in their business, occupation, or profession,or any portion of that business, occupation, or profession. We interpret these provisions to mean that cities and counties cannot completely ban CAMTC certificate holders from engaging in the business of massage or impose moratoriums on the massage businesses of CAMTC certificate holders(including stopping them from replacing certificate holders that have left the business or expanding the business),without violating the law. 3 Inaccuracies in response to Question No.24: The response to this question misstates the law and fails to accurately describe the legal basis for a suspension and how the process works. In accordance with Business and Professions Code section 4610(f), if CAMTC received notice that a certificate holder has been arrested AND charges have been filed for 647(b) -Prostitution or an act punishable as a sexually related crime the certificate of that person will be immediately suspended. The suspended certificate holder, any business that CAMTC has in its records as employing the suspended certificate holder, and the city or county where the certificate holder lives or works will be notified of the suspension. If the suspended certificate holder is convicted of 647(b)-Prostitution, an act punishable as a sexually related crime, or is required to register as a sex offender in California or another state, CAMTC will permanently revoke the certificate. If, however,the suspended certificate holder is not convicted of 647(b)- Prostitution, an act punishable as a sexually related crime,or is not required to register as a sex offender in California or another state, then by law CAMTC is required to re-instate the suspended certificate. In these situations, CAMTC may still proceed with disciplinary action against the certificate holder(including revocation, suspension, imposition of conditions, etc.) if it has evidence that the certificate holder has violated another provision of the Law. Inaccuracies in response to Question No.28: This question is poorly stated and the response therefore is nottechnically correct. Technically,AB 1147 applies to all massage professionals, because it has a provision stating that cities and counties can regulate those who are not CAMTC certified, and there are portions of Government Code section 51034 that apply to all massage businesses, regardless of the certification status of the owners. The real question is: Does CAMTC have jurisdiction over massage professionals that are not CAMTC certified? The answer to this question is: CAMTC only has jurisdiction over applicants and certificate holders. CAMTC does not have jurisdiction over massage businesses. 4 [. i t s..`....3 U E, *wb 5 December 3,2014 To: City and County Officials From: Assembly Members Susan Bonilla,Jimmy Gomez and Chris Holden Re: Implementation of AB 1147 As authors of AB 1147,we carried this legislation in order to return broad control over land use to local governments in regulating massage establishments in the best interests of the individual community. While the bill does not go into effect until January 1,2015, many jurisdictions are considering,or are in the process of updating their ordinances. There have been numerous questions regarding what AB 1147 authorizes and what it prohibits. As authors of this bill,we have worked together with the League of California Cities,the California State Association of Counties,the American Planning Association, California Chapter and the California Police Chiefs Association to help answer some of these questions. The answers to these questions are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice from the organizations involved with putting together this document. Each jurisdiction should consult with its city attorney/county counsel to gain a complete understanding of AB 1147,its impact on the existing ordinances,and its legal authority to regulate massage therapy businesses. 5incereiy, The Honorable Susan Bonilla T nbr- le Jim omez The Honorable Chris Holden Assembly Member, 14`h District Assembly Member,515L District Assembly Member,415t District B /L� EAG E F CALIFORNIA tCITIES FAQs with Regards to implementation of AS 1147 The answers to these FAQs are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice from the organizations involved with putting together this document. Each jurisdiction should consult with its city attorneylcounty counsel to gain a complete understanding of AB 1147,its impact on the jurisdiction's existing ordinances,and its legal authority to regulate massage therapy businesses. The provisions of AS 1147 take effect January 1,2015. 1) Q:Is a massage business that only uses certified massage professionals exempt from local regulation? A: No. Article XI,section 7 of the California Constitution as well as Business and Professions Code section 460(c). Government Code section 37101, Business and Professions Code 16000 and Government Code 51034 all recognize the authority of a city to regulate businesses that provide massage therapy services. Under AB 1147,cities and counties may regulate the business that provides the massage therapy services and California Massage Therapy Council(CAMTC) may regulate the individuals who apply for certification to provide massage therapy services. This division of authority and responsibility is reflected in the following statement of legislative intent: "it is the intent of the legislature that broad control over land use in regulating massage establishments be vested in local governments so that they may manage those establishments in the best interests of the individual community,and that the requirements and practice of the profession of massage remain a matter of statewide concern,regulation, and oversight'(Business&Professions Code 4600.5(b)). 2) Q. What limitations does AS 1147 impose on local regulation of certified massage professionals? A. A local jurisdiction may not(1) prohibit a person of one sex from engaging in the massage of a person of the other sex; (2)define a massage establishment as an adult entertainment business,or otherwise regulate a massage establishment as adult entertainment;(3) require a massage establishment to have windows or wails that do not extend from the floor to ceiling or have other internal physical structures(such as windows)that interfere with a client's privacy;(4) impose client draping requirements or otherwise require clients to wear special clothing; (5) prohibit a massage establishment from locking its external doors if the business is owned by one individual with one or no employees; (6) require a massage establishment to post any notice in an area that may be viewed by clients that contain explicit sexual language;(7)require a person certified by CAMTC to take any test,medical examination,or background check; (8)require a person certified by CAMTC to get a license, permit,or other authorization to provide massage unless that person is a business owner; (9)impose a dress code stricter than that imposed by AS 1147;or(10)prohibit massage techniques permitted by CAMTC(Government Code 51034(c)). 3) Q:Can a jurisdiction require independent contractors,sole providers,and owners of a massage business to obtain a business license, massage permit,register with the police,or get a background check? A:Yes. Under Government Code 51034(c)(8), a city may require a massage business owner,including a sole provider or independent contractorwho is CAMTC certified,to obtain a business license,and/or massage permit or other entitlement to carry on the business of massage therapy. Independent contractors in the"business"of providing massage therapy can be regulated as a "business." 4) Q:As part of its regulation of massage therapy businesses,can a jurisdiction require the business owner to provide a current listing of its employees and independent contractors,their CAMTC certifications and other relevant information? 12/0312014 � ` , ^ A:Yes. A jurisdiction's business regulation,ordinance may require a business owner tosubmit a list mf all ofits employees and independent contractors,their certification statu4andnodfy the local government whenthis information changes. 5} Q:Can m jurisdiction require o conditional use permit(0UF)for massage businesses? A: Yes. Business and Professions Code 460(c)provides explicit authorization to adopt land use regulations pertaining to massage businesses. Ajurisdiction may amend its zoning ordinance to require a CUP for amassage business However,a jurisdiction may not impose,conditions on the conditional use permit that would violate the provisions of Government Code S1O34(c)(1)'(18)mu described in Question No.2. An application for a CUP for a massage business would be considered under the same procedures provided in the jurisdiction's zoning,ordinances for other uses for which a CUP isrequired.s Jurisdictions should review their zon(ngordinances to-determine whether a massage business in operation prior to January 1,2015 is a lawful non-conforming use. @\ Q:Can a jurisdiction impose a restriction mn the location mfe massage business?ie'300 feet from e school,park etc. A: ABI147 gives local governments broad authority to use its Constitutional police power tuselect zoning districts that are most appropriate for massage. However,a jurisdiction may not define or otherwise regulate amassage establishment as"adult ertcrtainmment." A zoning ordinance that imposes a restriction on the location ofa massage establishment such as 300 feet from a school or park will be reviewed under a "reasonable and not arbitrary" standard. J\ Q. Can a jurisdiction require tm obtain a business license,massage permit,register with the police,mr get mbackground check? ' A. No. Ajurisdiction may not.require an individual massage therapist who holds acertificate from CAK4TC and operates as an employee to obtain any kind of license or permit or meet any other educational requirements,or to register with the police or submit to a background investigation(Government Code 51034(c)(8)). 8} Q:What is the best way tm make sure that only CAMTC-certiGedmassage professionals work inmmyjurisdiction? A. AB 1147 separates the certification of massage therapists from the regulation of massage businesses. The certification of massage therapists iu the responsibility of the CAKXT[. Thm-negu|ationofrnasnagebusinassesis the responsibility of local jurisdictions. Therefore,the best way to make sure that only CAM7C'certifiedmassage professionals work ioa jurisdiction istu adopt an ordinance that requires massage businesses to use[AK0T[' � certified massage profeos[ona|sonly. Another way is10 adopt an ordinance that prohibits a person from working in the jurisdiction as a massage therapist without a certificate issued by CAMTC. Because it's possible that the latter way might be interpreted ao conflicting with the CAMTC's role in certifying massage therapists,we,believe that imposing the restriction on the business ispreferable. 9) Q:Can jurisdictions regulate the hours wf operation wfa massage business? A,Yes. Jurisdictions can specify hours of operation based upon such factors as a commercial use in a residential neighborhood or other reasonable requirements. 208 Q:Can a jurisdiction prohibit a massage professional from working out of his mr her home? A: A jurisdiction can impose restrictions on massage professionals working out of their homes in the same manner that a jurisdiction regulates other professionals or business owners operating out of their homes. Some local governments regulate business owners operating from their homes through a home-occupation permit. 11) Q:Can jurisdiction limit the number of massage establishments in its jurisdiction? A:A jurisdiction may limit the number of massage establishments in its jurisdiction,if the jurisdiction is able to articulate a reasonable basis for the cap. 12) Q:Is a jurisdiction prohibited from requiring physical improvements,such ae transparent exterior windows? 12/03/3Ql4 A: No. However, a list of physical improvements that may not be required is described in the answer to Question #2. 13) Q:Can a jurisdiction adopt regulations to prohibit a massage business from opening in the same location as a previous business with illegal activity? A:Yes,if there is a reasonable basis for this regulation. 14) Q:Can a jurisdiction adopt regulations holding the owner accountable for the actions of its employees and independent contractors? A:Yes. An ordinance regulating massage businesses may include a provision holding the business owner responsible for how the business is conducted by its employees or independent contractors. In addition, Business and Professions Code section 4607 provides that CAMTC may discipline an owner or operator of a massage business or establishment who is CAIVITC-certified for the conduct of all individuals providing massage for compensation on the business premises. 15) Q:May a jurisdiction impose land use regulations on massage businesses that are different than those imposed on other professional services? A:Yes. This is one of the most significant changes to the law made by AB 1147. Prior to AB 11.47,jurisdictions were allowed to regulate businesses using certified massage professionals only to the extent that the jurisdiction uniformly applied those regulations to all other business professionals. This is no longer the law. 16) Q:Can a jurisdiction enter massage establishments and make reasonable inspections? A: Yes, Jurisdictions can conduct reasonable inspections as part of its ordinance requirements as well as recover the reasonable costs of these inspections and other regulatory requirements. 17) Q:Is a conditional use permit fee of$20,000-$30,000 legal? A: It depends. Fees,charges and rates are generally imposed in return for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted. A local government has the authority to impose fees, charges and rates under its police power through California Constitution Article X1,§7. A fee may not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory act for which the fee is charged. A fee that does exceed such cost may be considered a special tax. In addition,fees,charges and rates must be reasonable, fair and equitable in nature and proportionately representative of the costs incurred by the regulatory agency. AB 1147 includes the following statement of Legislative intent: "it is the intent of the Legislature that local governments impose and enforce only reasonable and necessary fees...... 18) Q:Can a jurisdiction prohibit condoms on the premises? A: Yes. A jurisdiction can prohibit condoms on the premises of a massage establishment as a standard in its ordinance if there is a reasonable basis for this requirement. 19) Q.How can a jurisdiction handle a massage business that(after a police sting and surrender of the business license)transfers the business to another individual? A: A jurisdiction may include in its ordinance a requirement that prohibits a massage business permit from being transferred without notice to and consent of the local government. 20) Q;Can a jurisdiction adopt and enforce a dress code for massage therapists? A: Yes, AB 1.147 includes certain restrictions on how certified massage therapists may dress. A jurisdiction may include those restrictions in its ordinance. Be aware, however,that a jurisdiction may not include stricter requirements for certified therapists, If dress code restrictions are included in a jurisdiction's ordinance,and an employee violates those restrictions, then the jurisdiction may enforce those provisions of its ordinance against the business as it determines appropriate. Violations of a municipal code may be enforced civilly, criminally, or through administrative enforcement. A jurisdiction is also encouraged to use the procedure outlined in question no, 23 to notify CAMTC of a violation. 12/03/2014 ,r 21) Q:What impact will AB 1147 have on existing massage businesses? A: Each jurisdiction should carefully review the provisions of its municipal code regarding non-conforming uses of land and imposing new regulations on existing businesses. 22) Q:Can a jurisdiction impose a temporary moratorium on approval of massage businesses? A:Yes. AB 1147 takes effect on January 1,2015. State law allows a city to adopt an interim ordinance that prohibits otherwise allowed uses when those uses conflict with a pending land use study. Such a measure requires. a 4/5 vote of the jurisdiction; must contain a finding that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or welfare;and may be adopted without following the notice and adoption procedures required for other ordinances. The measure has an initial duration of 45 days and may be extended as specified by Government Code 65858. Jurisdictions should exercise.caution before imposing a temporary moratorium if they have previously adopted a moratorium on the approval of massage businesses. 23) Q:Is there a process for a jurisdiction to follow if it wishes to inform CAMTC that it believes that a certified massage therapist is in violation of state or local law? A:Yes. A city is encouraged to report that information to CAMTC by going to CAMTC's homepage(www.camtc.org) and clicking on the link to"file a Complaint Against a CAMTC Certificate Holder." 24) Q:If a massage therapist with a CAMTC certificate is arrested for prostitution-or violating the Sex Offender Registration Act,will his or her certificate be revoked? A: If CAMTC receives notice that a certificate holder has been arrested and charges have been filed alleging prostitution or a violation of the Sex Offender Registration Act,the council is required to immediately suspend the certificate and notify the city or county in which the certificate holder lives or works of the suspension. if the person is convicted,the certificate is permanently revoked. If a certificate holder commits a different act that is punishable as a sexually related crime or otherwise violates provisions of AB 1147,CAMTC may(but is not required to)take disciplinary action including,for some violations, suspending the certificate, 25) Q:Who should jurisdictions report violations to? A: Violations of local ordinances should be prosecuted administratively,civilly,or criminally in accordance with the provisions of the jurisdiction's municipal code. if a jurisdiction believes that a CAMTC certified massage therapist is violating state law, then the jurisdiction is additionally encouraged to inform CAMTC as described under question no.23. 26) Q. What prompts the inspection/investigation of a massage therapy school that could change the status to "unapproved"? A: CAMTC explains that when it receives credible information alleging that the massage therapy school has violated one of the provisions of its Procedures for Un-Approval of Schools(available at www.camtc.org/Schools.aspx); this information prompts the investigation of a school. CAMTC also looks for anomalies or changing patterns in applications and transcripts that may warrant investigation. 27) How does CAMTC obtain the actual certificate of those persons whose certification has been suspended or revoked? A: CAMTC explains that it requests that revoked certificate holders return their certificates and ID cards to CAMTC. In order to check whether a specific person has an active and valid CAMTC certificate, local jurisdictions can check the"Verify Certification" link on CAMTC's website. 28) Q. Does AB 1147 apply to massage therapists who do not have a CAMTC certificate? A. No. AB 1147 only applies to massage therapists who have a CAMTC certificate. AB 1147 does not affect the authority of a city to regulate massage therapists who do not have CAMTC certificates or massage businesses who employ massage therapists who do not have CAMTC certificates. 12/'03/2014