HomeMy WebLinkAboutFive-Year Implementation Plan 2010-2014 - Redevelopment Proj Council/Agency Meeting Held: P=& D
Deferred/Continued to:
)&App oved ❑ C nd'tion I pproved ❑ Denied C C s Sig re
Council Meeting Date: 12/21/2009 Department ID Number: ED 09-70
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Chairman and Red pment Agency Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, Executive D' r
PREPARED BY: Stanley Smalewitz, Deputy E ecutive Director
SUBJECT: Conduct Public Hearing on the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2010-
2014) and Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation
Plan for Huntington Beach "Merged" Redevelopment Project
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: The California Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety
Code, §33490) requires Redevelopment Agencies to prepare and adopt Five-Year
Implementation Plans and Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plans.
The attached plans are submitted for public hearing and approval.
Funding Source: None Required.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
1. Conduct the public hearing as required.
2. Approve the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2010-2014) Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project; and,
3. Approve the Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan January
2010 — December 2014.
Alternative Action(s):
1. Do not approve the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2010-2014) Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project and Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation
Plan and recommend changes to the goals and objectives.
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/21/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 09-70
Analysis:
California Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code, §33490) requires
Redevelopment Agencies to prepare and, following a public hearing, adopt Five-Year
Implementation Plans. The Five-Year Implementation Plan for the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project expires December 2009. The Agency now is planning for the next
five years, 2010 to 2014, in this Five-Year Implementation Plan (Attachment 1).
The purpose of the Five-Year Implementation Plan is to identify the specific goals and
objectives for the Project, describe the specific programs, including potential projects and
estimated expenditures that would be made during the five years, and explain how these
activities will eliminate blight and improve and increase the supply of affordable housing.
Plan Goals: The Agency has developed twelve (12) goals to address the blighting conditions
within the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project Area. During this Implementation Plan
period, the Agency will be extremely active in remedying these conditions via projects such as
the redevelopment of the former Montgomery Wards site (Bella Terra - Phase II), the Edinger
Hotel Project, Waterfront third hotel, and Pacific City. The following are some of the major
goals of the Five-Year Implementation Plan. (For a complete list see the attached Plan.)
These goals are consistent with the City Council's Strategic Planning Goal for 2009-2012:
Enhance Economic Development.
Goal: Eliminate and prevent the spread of conditions of blight
• The Agency is presently working on two specific plans: (1) Beach/Edinger
Specific Plan, and (2) an update to the Downtown Specific Plan and Parking
Master Plan which may include the rezoning of property.
Goal: Expand the commercial base of the Project Area
• The Agency detailed several significant projects in the Implementation Plan that
are ongoing in the development process and intended to fulfill the desired goal
of expanding the commercial base of the Project Area.
o Bella Terra - Phase 2, the former Montgomery Wards site
o Edinger Hotel, 120-150 room hotel on Agency owned site south of Bella
Terra
o Waterfront Project - Parcel C, a third hotel of approximately 300 rooms
o Pacific City — 31-acre mixed use project that includes hotel, retail, office,
and residential components
Goal: Improve public facilities and infrastructure
• Street and alley improvements in the Main-Pier Subareas.
• Street light replacement in the Main-Pier Subareas.
-2- 12/7/2009 4:13 PM
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/21/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 09-70
• Construction of bluff top restrooms.
• Improvement to the storm drains to address capacity issues within the existing
drainage system serving the Oakview Subarea. The project to include
construction of new parallel storm drain lines, installing manholes, junction and
transition structures, and enclosed storm drain box culvert.
Housing Component: The Agency has completed an Affordable Housing Component AB
1290 Implementation Plan January 2010—December 2014 inclusive of the Affordable
Housing Component required of Implementation Plans. The Affordable Housing Component
will be adopted concurrently with this Implementation Plan. The Affordable Housing
Component identifies a funding plan and activities related to the production of affordable
housing for persons of low and moderate income for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
Project and the Southeast Coastal Project Area.
The Affordable Housing Component Implementation Plan provides the opportunity to review
what the Agency has accomplished and to review the Agency's affordable housing goals,
objectives, and specific program to meet its affordable housing obligations over the time-
frame of the Plan (2010-2014). In brief, the Agency has currently met all of its replacement
and production obligations. The Affordable Housing Component Implementation Plan will
also ensure that the Agency's goals are consistent with the City's Housing Element's goals to
provide affordable housing. In addition, the projects undertaken by the Agency are counted
toward the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).
Public Notice: A notice of this hearing was published according to Government Code §6063
and posted in four permanent places within the project area for a period of three weeks. The
Huntington Beach Independent publication dates for the public notice were, November 26,
December 3 and 10, 2009, completing the publication period of ten days prior to this hearing
date as required by law.
Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance Economic Development
Environmental Status: Not Applicable
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
ee Num'b.'er NO. De9c6ption
1. Five-Year Implementation Plan (2010-2014) Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project
2. Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan
Janua 2010 — December 2014
-3- 12/7/2009 4:13 PM
ATTACHMENT # 1
a,
F _ _
,a 1
o -
tn � •.• ri
000,
ki
pi
NN
F�—v;ow.
L r LI
D�-�cer�n �•��t� 2 �, 2�i0�
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Redevelopment Agency Bard
Chair
CATHY GREEN
Vice-Chair
JILL HARDY
Members
KEITH BOHR
JOE CARCHIO
GIL COERPER
DON HANSEN
DEVIN DWYER
FRED A. WILSON
Executive Director
STANLEY SMALEWITZ
Deputy Executive Director
Staff
KELLEE FRITZAL
Deputy Director of Economic Development
LUIS GOMEZ
Economic Development Project Manager
DORIS POWELL
Assistant Project Manager
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2010 — 2014 Implementation Plan page I
PLAN PURPOSE
This is the Five Year Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) for the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project (Project Area) covering the period of fiscal years 2009/10 to 2013/14.
This implementation Plan complies with California Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code
Section 33490), which requires redevelopment agencies to maintain (initiate and update each five
years thereafter) an implementation plan describing the steps and expenditures an agency will
take to achieve its redevelopment goals.
This Implementation Plan describes the goals and objectives of the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency (Agency), which were established to eliminate blight within the Project
Area. It also describes past, current, and future projects and programs implemented to meet
Agency goals and objectives; and anticipated Agency expenditures needed to facilitate those
projects and programs described herein.
Agency goals and objectives are as follows:
• Eliminate physical and economic blight in the Project Area;
• Assist in business retention and attraction efforts to create jobs for residents;
• Create and preserve affordable housing in the Project Area;
• Renew and create economic activity within the Project Area; and
• Capitalize on the characteristics and resources unique to the area.
This Implementation Plan is intended to act as a general document that provides direction to the
Agency to address blighting conditions that remain in the Project Area. The Implementation Plan
sets Agency priorities for the coming five-year period, while accounting for budget constraints in
developing a program of activities to accomplish revitalization efforts. As new issues and
redevelopment opportunities arise during the five-year period, the Implementation Plan may be
amended, as necessary.
Implementation Plan Adoption Process
Each Implementation Plan must be presented and adopted at a duly noticed public hearing of the
Agency. Notice of Implementation Plan adoption must be published pursuant to Section 6063 of
the Government Code, mailed at least three weeks in advance to all persons and agencies that
have requested notice, and posted in at least four permanent places within the Project Area for a
period of three weeks. Publication, mailing, and posting shall be completed not less than 10 days
prior to the date set for hearing.
Implementation Plan Amendment and Midterm Review
The Agency may amend the Implementation Plan at any time after conducting a public hearing on
the proposed amendment. The Agency may amend the Implementation Plan if a new project or
program is developed during the five-year Implementation Plan period that is not currently
included in this document.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 2
Also, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33490 (c), at least once within the five-year
term of the Implementation Plan, the Agency must conduct a public hearing and allow testimony
from all interested parties regarding the status of the Implementation Plan. This hearing must
take place no earlier than two years and no later than three years after the adoption of the
Implementation Plan.
Affordable Housing Requirements Not Included in this Implementation Plan
The documentation of affordable housing requirements within the Project Area is being prepared
and approved by the Agency under a separate document, which will be incorporated into this
Implementation Plan via reference. The "Affordable Housing Strategy" for the Project Area
satisfies the requirements of Sections 33334.2, 33334.4, 33334.6, 33413 (a), and 33413 (b) of the
Health and Safety Code. The Affordable Housing Strategy summarizes the Agency's housing
obligations pursuant to the legal requirements of AB 1290, AB 315, AB 437, AB 637, and SB 701
for the 2009/10- 2013/14 planning period.
Implementation Plan is Not a "Project" Under CEQA
Pursuant to Section 33490 (a)(1)(B) of the Health and Safety Code, the Implementation Plan does
not constitute a project within the meaning of Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code (the
California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA]). This Implementation Plan does not constitute an
approval of any specific program, project, or expenditure nor does it eliminate the requirement for
CEQA review (to the extent that it is required) at the time of approval of the program, project, or
expenditure.
PROJECT AREA BACKGROUND
• In 1982, the Agency adopted four (4) separate redevelopment areas: Main-Pier, Talbert-
Beach, Yorktown-Lake, and Oakview. The primary purpose of the original redevelopment
plans for these areas was to eliminate blight by encouraging revitalization activities within
the project areas.
• In 1983, the redevelopment plan for the Main-Pier Project Area was amended to expand
the Main-Pier Project Area boundaries.
• In 1984, the Agency adopted the Huntington Center Redevelopment Area (Bella Terra
Area).
• In December 1996, the Agency merged the five (5) previously identified redevelopment
project areas to form a single project area entitled the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
Project, which consists of a total of 619 acres.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Passe 3
A Description of each Subarea is provided below:
1. The 25-acre Talbert-Beach Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982, by Ordinance
No. 2577. At its adoption, this Subarea consisted of many encyclopedia lots which were
small undevelopable parcels under multiple ownerships. The area is now characterized
by a balance of industrial and residential development.
2. The 30-acre Yorktown-Lake Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982, by Ordinance
No. 2576. This Subarea consists primarily of single family homes, an apartment
complex for seniors, and the City's Civic Center.
3. The original five-block Main-Pier Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982 by
Ordinance 2578. On September 6, 1983, the Redevelopment Plan was amended by
Ordinance No. 2634, enlarging the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area to
approximately 336 acres. The Subarea is located along a portion the City's beach and
encompasses the downtown. It is characterized by a mix of residential, retail, office,
hotel, and public (i.e. Huntington Beach Pier, City Beach, etc.) uses.
4. The 68-acre Oakview Subarea was adopted on November 1, 1982, by Ordinance No.
2582. This Subarea is predominantly developed with older, multifamily housing that are
not up to building codes.
5. The 160-acre Huntington Center Subarea was adopted on November 26, 1984, by
Ordinance No. 2743. It is comprised exclusively of commercial uses and contains the
former Huntington Center Mall, which has been redeveloped into Bella Terra Mall, a
regional lifestyle retail and entertainment center. An OCTA Transit Center is also
located within this Project Area.
Maps outlining the Subarea boundaries are presented in Exhibits A-E attached to this
Implementation Plan.
Project Area Time Limits
Pursuant to California Redevelopment Law, redevelopment areas are subject to various time
limits. The table below summaries the Project Area time limits pertaining to plan effectiveness,
eminent domain authority, incurring debt, and repaying debt.
Efferqfive bate 6f Eminent
Subarea AdopOn Date Plan Authorit
Yorktown-Lake 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 No Authority Rescinded 9/1/2035
Talbert-Beach 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 No Authority Rescinded 9/1/2035
Original Main-Pier 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 7/15/2014 Rescinded 9/1/2035
Oakview 11/1/1982 11/1/2025 No Authority Rescinded 11/1/2035
Added Main-Pier 9/6/1983 9/6/2026 7/15/2014 Rescinded 9/6/2036
Huntington Center 1 11/26/1984 11/26/2027 7/15/2014 1 Rescinded 11/26/2037
Oakview Subarea excludes eminent domain on certain properties(Exhibit D-Redevelopment Plan).
Original Main-Pier and Added Main-Pier Subareas excludes eminent domain on property on which any persons legally reside.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pa-ge 4
BLIGHT ELIMINATION
Redevelopment projects are established in order to remove both physical and economic blighting
conditions within the Project Area boundaries. Through field surveys and detailed research, the
Agency adopted the Project Area boundaries, by first properly documenting the existence of both
physical and economic blight within each Subarea. The definition of blight has evolved through
State Legislation since the various subareas of the Project Area were first established in 1982.
The current physical and economic conditions that cause blight, as stated in Section 33031 of the
Health and Safety Code, are described below. In order for a property to be classified as blighted,
at least one condition of both physical and economic blight must exist.
Physical Blighting Conditions
• Buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work. These conditions
may be caused by serious building code violations, serious dilapidation and deterioration
caused by long term neglect, construction that is vulnerable to serious damage from
seismic or geologic hazards, and faulty or inadequate water or sewer utilities.
• Conditions that prevent or substantially hinder the viable use or capacity of buildings or
lots. These conditions may be caused by buildings of substandard, defective, or obsolete
design or construction given the present general plan, zoning, or other development
standards.
• Adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses that prevent the development of those parcels
or other portions of the project area.
• The existence of subdivided lots that are in multiple ownership and whose physical
development has been impaired by their irregular shapes and inadequate sizes, given
present general plan and zoning standards and present market conditions.
Economic Blighting Conditions
• Depreciated or stagnant property values.
• Impaired property values, due in significant part, to hazardous wastes on property where
the agency may be eligible to use its authority as specified in Article 12.5 (commencing
with Section 33459).
• Abnormally high business vacancies, abnormally low lease rates, or an abnormally high
number of abandoned buildings.
• A serious lack of necessary commercial facilities that are normally found in
neighborhoods, including grocery stores, drug stores, and banks and other lending
institutions.
• Serious residential overcrowding that has resulted in significant public health or safety
problems. As used in this paragraph, 'overcrowding" means exceeding the standard
referenced in Article 5 (commencing with Section 32) of Chapter 1 of Title 25 of the
California Code of Regulations.
• An excess of bars, liquor stores, or adult oriented businesses that has resulted in
significant public health, safety, or welfare problems.
• A high crime rate that constitutes a serious threat to the public safety and welfare.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 5
State Redevelopment Law characterizes inadequate public improvements (including water and
sewer facilities) as blight when the aforementioned conditions are present.
The Implementation Plan must include a description of remaining blight in the project area and
how the Agency plans to address those conditions. During the preparation of this Implementation
Plan, a blight survey was conducted to identify physical and economic blighting conditions in the
Project Area. The following blight remains in the project areas:
• Deterioration and dilapidation of buildings;
• Unsafe building conditions caused by buildings not seismically retrofitted;
• Irregular subdivision of lots (shapes and sizes) that impairs physical development of the
lots;
• Buildings with substandard and obsolete design that hinder the viable use or capacity of
buildings or lots;
• High crime rates relative to other areas of the City; and
• Inadequate public improvements.
Redevelopment Agencies often find that blighting conditions on properties outside of the Project
Area are affecting the success of blight elimination within a redevelopment project area. To
determine other areas within the City (many are adjacent to the Project Area) that exhibit physical
and economic blighting conditions the Agency undertook a preliminary feasibility study to analyze
blight. A blight survey was conducted, which identified approximately 139 acres exhibiting the
following physical and economic blighting conditions:
• Unsafe and unhealthy building conditions caused by buildings built prior to 1971 that were
not seismically retrofitted to address liquefaction conditions that exist on the property;
• Deterioration and dilapidation of exterior building materials;
• Buildings with substandard and obsolete design that hinder the viable use or capacity of
buildings or lots;
• Declining and stagnant property values; and
• Other factors causing physical and economic blight.
These blighted properties could have a negative effect on the redevelopment actions occurring
within the Project Area. Therefore, the Agency is moving forward with the tasks necessary to
accomplish a Plan Area Amendment, which could potentially increase the Project Area by up to
139 acres.
Huntington Reach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 6
AGENCY GOALS DESIGNED TO ELIMINATE BLIGHT
The Agency has developed twelve (12) general goals to address the existing blighting conditions
that remain in the Project Area. These goals are designed to guide the activities of the Agency
and structure revitalization projects that would address the remaining blight within the Project
Area.
• Eliminate and prevent the spread of conditions of blight;
• Expand the commercial base of the Project Area;
• Improve public facilities and public infrastructure;
• Improve inadequate drainage infrastructure;
• Improve and/or provide electric, gas, telephone, and wastewater infrastructure to both
developed and undeveloped properties within the Project Area;
• Promote local job opportunities;
• Encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, businesses, businesspersons,
public agencies, and community organizations in the redevelopment/revitalization of the
Project Area;
• Implement design and use standards to assure high aesthetic and environmental quality,
and provide unity and integrity to developments within the Project Area;
• Address parcels of property that are of irregular form and shape, are inadequately sized
for property usefulness and development, and/or are held in multiple ownership;
• Remove impediments to land disposition and development through the assembly of
property into reasonably sized and shaped parcels served by improved infrastructure and
public facilities;
• Recycle and/or develop underutilized parcels to accommodate higher and better economic
uses while enhancing the City's financial resources; and
• Develop housing opportunities for all income levels.
An example of how the Agency has eliminated blight within the Project Area is shown below with
the redevelopment of the Huntington Center now known as Bella Terra:
z
G
Before After
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pane 7
PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS
Since the inception of the Project Subareas, the Agency has aggressively sought to eliminate
blight within the Project Area through the implementation of various projects and programs. This
section outlines the Agency's past, current, and future efforts to meet the Project Area's goals and
objectives geared toward eliminating blight in the Project Area. The following table provides a
summary of the Agency's goals and the blighting factors on which the Agency focuses when
developing projects and committing expenditures:
GOALS AND BLIGHT CATEGORIES
GOAL
•, r GOAL .
6ATEGORY �
1 Eliminate and prevent the spread of conditions of blight.
2 Expand the commercial base of the Project Area.
3 Improve public facilities and public infrastructure.
4 Improve inadequate drainage infrastructure.
5 Improve and/or provide electric, gas, telephone, and wastewater infrastructure to both
developed and undeveloped properties within the Project Area.
6 Promote local job opportunities.
Encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, businesses, businesspersons,
7 public agencies, and community organizations in the redevelopment/revitalization of the
Project Area.
8 Implement design and use standards to assure high aesthetic and environmental quality, and
provide unity and integrity to developments within the Project Area.
9 Address parcels of property that are of irregular form and shape, are inadequately sized for
property usefulness and development, and/or are held in multiple ownership.
Remove impediments to land disposition and development through the assembly of property
10 into reasonably sized and shaped parcels served by improved infrastructure and public
facilities.
11 Recycle and/or develop underutilized parcels to accommodate higher and better economic
uses while enhancing the Cit 's financial resources.
12 Develop housing opportunities for all income levels.
BLIGET BLIGHTING, FrC7°OR
CATEGORY f
A Serious deterioration and dilapidation of buildings.
B Unsafe building conditions caused by buildings not seismically retrofitted.
C Irre ular subdivision of lots (shapes and sizes that impairs physical development of the lots.
Buildings with substandard and obsolete design that hinder the viable use or capacity o
D buildings or lots.
E High crime rates relative to other areas of the City.
F linadequate public improvements.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 8
Past Projects and Programs
The following projects highlight the Agency's past efforts to address the goals of the Agency and
assist in eliminating blight within the Project Area:
PROJECTS ACCOMPLISHED FROM 2005-2009
T
*PROJ BUGECT.
" EL ADDRESISdED
Waterfront Project - Hyatt
Regency Huntington Beach 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11 & 12 F
Resort & Spa
Waterfront Project -William
Lyon Homes: Sea Cove 1, 3, 10, 11 & 12 F
Residential
Waterfront Project - Christopher
Homes: Sea Colony at 1, 3, 10, 11 & 12 F
Waterfront Residential
The Strand (Blocks 104-105), 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 & 11 A, B, C, D, E & F
CIM Project
Property Acquisition of 7872
Edinger Avenue (Assessor 2, 6, 8, 10 & 11 D
—Parcel Number: 142-081-28)
Bella Terra - Phase 1 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 & 11 A, D & E
Details regarding each of the above stated projects are provided in the following pages:
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 ImRiementation Plan Page 9
Waterfront Project- Hyatt gency Huntington Beach Resort& Spa
t.
r � i
vs M+
• In fiscal year 1996/97 the Agency entered into an agreement with the Robert Meyer
Corporation to develop what is today the Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach Resort and
Spa.
• The resort offers over 500 rooms and approximately 80,000 square feet of meeting rooms
and convention space.
• The Agency assisted the project with over $16.75 million, part of which was financed
through a federal loan of$6 million for required infrastructure.
• Agency staff 1) monitored the repayment of the Developer Advance loan and the Tax
Increment and Transient Occupancy Tax pledged as the sources for the loan repayment
(this activity is ongoing), 2) calculated and processed the payments to the developer, 3)
monitored the lease payments and the beach restriction lease payments to the Agency
(this activity is ongoing).
Waterfront Project-William Lyon Homes: Sea Cove Residential
William Lyon Homes developed 106 residential units as
part of the Waterfront Residential Project.
• These 106 townhomes consist of two- and three-story
floor plans ranging from 1 620 to 2 690 square feet.
� ..FIB p 9 9 q
• These residential units have contributed to the
` .., revitalization efforts of the Downtown by increasing the
number of residents in the area. Residents of this
" development enjoy the revitalized commercial and
Y ¢ recreational amenities of the area.
A part of the Waterfront Project, Agency assisted with
infrastructure and provided assistance to Planning by
reviewing the plans for the development.
Huntington Reach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 10
Waterfront Project- Christopher Homes: Sea Colony at Waterfront Residential
• A 78 townhome project undertaken by Christopher Homes
as part of the Waterfront Residential project was completed
in 2007.
• This townhome project consists of three separate floor
plans ranging from 2,961 to 3,387 square feet.
• This development has contributed to the successful
revitalization of the Downtown and is contributing to the
pedestrian oriented environment of the Downtown as the
residents can walk to the many services provided by
retailers in this portion of the Project Area.
:, • A part of the Waterfront Project, Agency assisted with
p" infrastructure and provided assistance to Planning by
reviewing the plans for the development.
The Strand
1!
J
• This project consists of a two-block area comprising 3.97 acres on Pacific Coast Highway
between 5th and 6th street. The Agency worked in collaboration with the developer, CIM,
to develop four distinct buildings (hotel, retail, commercial, and restaurant components)
linked by open-air pedestrian walkways. The project was completed in late Spring 2009.
• The project contains the Shorebreak Hotel, a boutique hotel consisting of 157 rooms;
Zimzala, a restaurant featuring authentic coastal cuisine, a public parking garage with 436
spaces; and 110,000 square feet of office and retail space featuring national credit
tenants.
• The City Council and Agency adopted a 6th Implementation Agreement for this project in
November 2008.
• Agency participation of $950,000 in assistance will be provided for 25 additional parking
spaces in the parking garage, which will be structured as a loan repaid at 10% interest.
The Parking In Lieu Fund has repaid $500,000 of the $950,000.
• The Agency's financial assistance is limited to tax increment generated from the project
and from tax increment revenue generated within the Project Area.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pane 11
Property Acquisition of 7872 Edinger Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number: 142-081-28)
E"�` • The Agency acquired the property at the
9 Y q p p Y
southeast corner of Edinger Avenue and
Parkside Lane in January 2009 for$3,431,500.
The Agency purchased this property from HB
Auto I, LLC to combine this property with the
Agency-owned property that is immediately
adjacent.
• This 22,509 square foot property includes an
�A 8,169 square foot auto retail shop.
The purchase of this property will create a
larger parcel to facilitate redevelopment
opportunities within the Huntington Center
Subarea.
En
Bella Terra - Phase I
e
Y ¢
• In 2006, the former Huntington Center Mall was successfully redeveloped into Bella Terra
(Phase 1), a regional destination for restaurants, retail, and entertainment. The project
was purchased by DJM Capital Partners.
• Phase I of Bella Terra consists of approximately 777,000 square feet of retail space.
• The Agency assistance consists of $15 million to be reimbursed to the developer over 20
years from site-generated tax increment (this activity is on-going).
• The Agency's reimbursable costs contributed to the following activities: demolition,
clearance, site preparation, public improvements, utilities &facilities, and acquisition of the
land and easements.
• Community Facility District (CFD) was formed for the public parking structure.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 12
CURRENT PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS
The following projects and programs highlight the Agency's current efforts to address the goals for
redeveloping the Project Area:
CURRENT PROJECTS
00AC8 BLIGHT
APROJECT
_ ESTm AEVIO�JNIT
ADD
RESSE� w EL IYII A7°E®
Beach/Edinger Specific Plan 1,2,617 &8 A, B, C, D, E & F Already Funded
Downtown Specific Plan 1,2,6,7 &8 A, B, C, D, E & F Already Funded
Storm Drain Construction 3,4,5 &6 F $2.5 Million
$19 Million from
Improvements to public participation payments put
facilities and public 3,4 & 5 B & F into the City's Capital
Improvement Program
infrastructure from the Waterfront
Residential project.
Agency Community 7 A, B, C, D, E & F Agency Staff Oversight
Outreach Provided
Details regarding each of the above stated projects are further provided below:
Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan
The Agency is finalizing
(anticipated
` i by the Second Quarter of 2010) the
Yt ,' Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific
F f qJ' y Plan, which is being created to
produce a more favorable
environment for commercial, office,
A industrial, residential, and
j recreational development.
ji
• The Agency anticipates that the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan will address
the following:
o underutilization of properties;
o deteriorated buildings;
o incompatible land uses that produce economic blight;
o the removal of obsolete structures that produce low lease rates and economic
returns for property owners; and
o the development of a variety of housing opportunities.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Imelementation Plan Page 13
Downtown Specific Plan
�v " �• `fir �r:,-
s
-�...�...•-' _ ,-"..}"'-----
• The Agency prepared an update to the Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Parking
Master Plan, which covers the Main-Pier Subarea. The update will encourage new
development and spur revitalization projects.
• The Downtown Specific Plan was adopted on November 2, 2009, but certain aspects of
the plan will be reconsidered by the City Council on January 19, 2010.
• Once approved by the California Coastal Commission (anticipated in Third Quarter 2011)
the Downtown Specific Plan will help lay the foundation for the entitlement, re-design, and
development of future projects that will address:
o underutilization of properties;
o deteriorated buildings;
o incompatible land uses that produce economic blight;
o the removal of obsolete structures that produce low lease rates and economic
returns for property owners; and
o a variety of housing opportunities.
Storm Drain Construction
® Construction of a $2.5 million parallel storm drain at the intersection of Slater and Parkside
was funded by the Agency. The project will address capacity issues within the existing
drainage system the serves the Oakview Subarea.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 14
Improvements to Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure
L
• Finalize the seismic retrofit and refurbishing of City Hall. This includes the provision of
more efficient light and improvements to heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems
at City Hall.
• Main Street Library improvements to meet the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act.
• Review of parking in the downtown area is facilitated by the Downtown Parking Master
Plan.
• Construct concrete, asphalt and public improvements in the Oakview neighborhood.
• Construction of visitor kiosk and three permanent pier concessionaire buildings within the
Main-Pier Subarea.
• Building improvements including the Art Center, Main Street Library, fire stations to
meet ADA standards.
• Upgrade elevators and installation of security cameras in the Main Promenade parking
structure.
• The undergrounding of utilities along Pacific Coast Highway in conjunction with Southern
California Edison (SCE), CalTrans, and California State Beaches Department is in
progress. Agency staff is monitoring project progress and informing developers within the
Main-Pier Subarea of positive upgrades to utilities for the area.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pa-ge 15
Agency Community Outreach
-_
y
4
;t
• Downtown Image Ad Hoc Committee was established by the City Council to solicit input
from the residential and business communities of the City regarding methods for improving
the environment of the Downtown on weekends, evenings and holidays. The Committee's
findings were presented to City Council on August 17, 2009. Staff will begin implementing
the recommendations in 2010.
• The Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan community meetings were conducted from
2007 through 2009. Final presentations of the results of the findings from the Study will be
presented at public hearings to finalize the Specific Plan.
• The Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Parking Master Plan conducted four
community meetings from 2007 thought 2009.
• Surf City Nights, a weekly street fair attracts shoppers and increases foot traffic in
Downtown and further the development of the Downtown as a destination for shopping
and entertainment. This program will be on-going during this five year period.
• Redevelopment Plan Amendment community information meetings are expected to be
conducted in the Second Quarter of 2010 to discuss the proposed amendment to add
territory to the Project Area. This outreach effort follows after the Shopping Center
Mayor's Forum was conducted in 2008 to ascertain the desires of the community to
address blighting conditions (determined through an initial assessment by Agency staff) in
shopping centers throughout the City.
• Community involvement activities are anticipated to be accomplished every year during
the five-year period of this Implementation Plan.
• The Agency has conducted numerous outreach efforts to promote local job opportunities
such as co-hosting business seminars and assisting with the Small Business Assistance
Center.
• The projects anticipated within the Project Area will produce construction jobs and on-
going employment opportunities after development is completed at each of the project
sites.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 16
FUTURE PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS
The following projects and programs highlight the Agency's future efforts to address the goals for
redeveloping the Project Area:
FUTURE PROJECTS
d90d4 .S„. ` GHT
.PR08ECT
=EST.AMOU.N..
T
: B tELYMNATr=Q;:>p® E$S ®
Redevelopment Plan Amendment 1,2,6,7&8 A, B, C, D, E&F $200,000
Undergrounding of Utilities 1,3,5&6 F Agency Staff
Oversight Provided
Waterfront Project-Parcel C 1, 2, 3,6, 10& 11 F Agency Staff
Oversight Provided
Bella Terra-Phase 11 1,2, 3,6, 8, 10, 11 & A, D& E Agency Staff
12 Oversight Provided
Atlanta/Beach Center 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10& 11 A, B, D&E To Be Determined
Edinger Hotel 1, 2, 3,6, 8, 10& 11 F To Be Determined
Pacific City-31-Acre Site 1,2, 3, 6,12 10, 11 & C&F $5.5 Million
Agency Property Acquisition 8,9,10, 11 & 12 A, B, C, D, E&F To Be Determined
Business Retention/Property Upgrades 8,9,10& 11 A, B, D&E To Be Determined
Funded through the
Public Facilities Improvements 3, 5&6 F Agency's Capital
Improvement Program
Details regarding each of the above stated projects are further provided below:
Redevelopment Plan Amendment
• The Redevelopment Plan Amendment is a study of commercial parcels including shopping
centers and strip malls throughout the City to address physical and economic blighting
conditions to remediate the long term effects of neglected property upgrades that have
impacted the economic viability of these shopping centers.
• The Redevelopment Plan Amendment process is anticipated to be completed in late
2010/11.
• Agency staff estimates that bids for redevelopment, mapping and environmental
consulting services will total approximately $200,000 with approximately $120,000
expended in 2009/10 and $80,000 expended in fiscal year 2010/11 toward the work
conducted to accomplish the Redevelopment Plan Amendment.
• The goal is to add commercial properties that exhibit conditions of physical and
economic blight to the Project Area so that the economic tools available through
redevelopment can be used to eliminate these conditions.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 ImRlementation Plan Page 17
Undergrounding of Utilities
• The new utility infrastructure and facilities will provide upgraded utility components that will
serve new and existing property owners.
• Upgrades are anticipated to be accomplished every year during the five-year period of this
Implementation Plan.
• Agency Staff will work with Public Works to assist in the prioritization of projects.
Waterfront Project (Parcel C)
• In October 2008 the Agency approved the 3rd Implementation Agreement (Disposition
Development Agreement), which provides for the phased development of Parcel C in the
Waterfront Project.
• A third hotel comprising 300 rooms, with a spa, fitness facility and lounge/bar for guests is
anticipated.
• The project will add needed public infrastructure upgrades to off-site improvements, create
additional hospitality industry and construction jobs, and increase property tax, sales tax
and transient occupancy tax revenue to the Agency and City.
• The Agency will receive a payment of $250,000 from the Developer each time an
extension to the Disposition and Development Agreement is granted. This payment will.
compensate for the estimated loss in Transient Occupancy Tax that the City would have
received as a result of the early development of the third hotel.
Bella Terra - Phase 11 /Village at Bella Terra
3 .v3
�V y
�:�,-,_.i •gin
• This project includes the redevelopment of the abandoned Montgomery Wards and
Mervyn's buildings and the development of a mixed use project including 156,000 square
feet of retail, commercial and 503-700 market rate and affordable housing units.
• Review of Phase II plans and proposed development projects are anticipated annually
during the five-year period of this Implementation Plan.
• The project will improve pedestrian access to Bella Terra through improved public
infrastructure in the western and northern portions of the Bella Terra site; create many job
opportunities during construction and operation of the development, and increase sales
tax and property tax revenue to the City and Agency.
• Staff is working with DJM to create an Owner Participation Agreement to ensure final
construction of the project.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pave 18
Atlanta/Beach Center
• The Center is an underperforming older shopping center that requires significant
rehabilitation or complete redevelopment.
• The Agency is collaborating with multiple property owners to facilitate the rehabilitation of
the building exteriors in order to revitalize the Center.
• The rehabilitation of the Center will remediate physical blighting conditions on the property,
increase sales tax revenue to the City and create jobs for residents.
• The City may abandon the frontage road to maximize development opportunities.
Edinger Hotel
Ede,Aa. The Agency acquired the adjacent site (7872 Edinger
Avenue), which consists of approximately 18,000 square
.._ feet and an 8,169 square foot auto retail shop to combine
°r with the adjacent Agency-Owned properties, which
1� comprise approximately 56,700 square feet of vacant land
Assessor Parcel Numbers: 142-081-06, 142-081-09, 142-
i 081-10, 142-081-11, 142-081-12).
zt • The Agency prepared a Request for Proposals for
s �r;
the development of a hotel at the southeast corner
of Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane.
a • This hotel site could achieve a high�quality,
ri nationally branded hotel consisting of approximately
120 to 150 rooms with amenities that would make
the hotel an attractive lodging option in the central
region of the County of Orange.
Pacific City
The proposed project is a 31-acre mixed use project that
pax; 77 + includes a 250 guest room hotel with a restaurant/bar, spa
-- � and 11,000 square feet of meeting space; 516 residential
housing units; 48,900 square feet of restaurant space;
30,000 square feet of office space; and 161,000 square
feet of retail space.
' °" • A Community Facilities District may be structured
to provide the funding for public improvements, a
parking structure and the Regional Urban Runoff
Treatment System for the residential portion of the
project.
• The Agency proposes to fund $5.5 million worth of public improvements through tax
increment revenue generated from the project over a 20-year period.
• Pacific City is expected to generate tax increment based on $850 million of assessed
project value, a large portion of which will be utilized to fund additional blight remediation
projects in the Project Area.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Im2lementation Plan Paste 19
• The project will improve public infrastructure in the Main-Pier Subarea, create job
opportunities during construction and operation of the development, and increase sales
tax and transient occupancy tax revenue to the City.
Agency Property Acquisition
• The Agency will consider acquiring blighted, underutilized, and incompatible properties
within the Project Area.
• Acquisition activities will be focused on assisting in the revitalization of the Project Area by
addressing blighting conditions such as unsafe and unhealthy building conditions,
properties under multiple ownership that affect the economic viability of the property or
properties that are not economically viable because of conditions such as hazardous
material remediation.
• All acquisition will focus on the future development of improvements that are consistent
with the General Plan and the goals of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
Business Retention/Property Upgrades
"Enhancing Economic Development" is also
described as business development which supports
the financial strategic goal to Fund Capital '
Improvements and Enhance Financial Reserves.
Without a strong economic base of business to
provide jobs and the delivery of goods and services,
the local economy may suffer as a result of j ✓` *
reductions in its sales and property tax bases.
Having a highly skilled workforce able to live and
work in the community offers the opportunity for they
City to become self-sustainable. By using the goal r �
of "Improving Communication," the business k hWIT
development activities engage the businessOR
w "�
community through the following activities: z
Scheduling on-site business visits by the
Mayor, City Administrator, and Director of mL
Economic Development to offer technical
assistance and market the City for
commercial and industrial retention and
expansion;
• Co-sponsoring the annual Economic e _
Conference with the Chamber of Commerce; ;
• Providing ombudsman services for
businesses seeking assistance in complying
with City requirements and regulations;
• Offering technical assistance for existing and start-up businesses; and
• Developing and implementing educational programs and incentives designed to
encourage residents to support essential local services by shopping in Huntington
Beach.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pave 20
Public Facilities Improvements
• Street and alley improvements in the Main-Pier Subareas.
• Street light replacement in the Main-Pier Subareas.
• Construction of beach restrooms.
• Improvement to the storm drains to address capacity issues within the existing drainage
system serving the Oakview Subarea. The project to include construction of new
parallel storm drain lines, installing manholes, junction and transition structures, and
enclosed storm drain box culvert.
AGENCY FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
The Agency adopts its budget on an annual basis; as such actual revenues and expenditures may
differ from those forecasts presented in the Implementation Plan and are therefore subject to
change. Projections of revenues and expenditures contained within this Implementation Plan
were based upon the assumptions delineated below:
Cash Flow General Assumptions
1. Resources available to the Agency include net tax increment revenues, Agency
identified miscellaneous revenues and interest income.
2. Current Debt Service Obligations — includes the annual debt service for the 1999 and
2002 Tax Allocation Bonds, as well as participation obligations and loan repayments
from Agency-identified project activities.
3. Administration and Other Requirements — Administrative costs and other expenditures
related to Agency operations were based upon current operational expenses.
4. State Budget Take Away - The California.State Legislature and Governor approved
budget bill ABX4-26 as part of the 2009 State budget which authorizes a $2.05 billion
take from local redevelopment funds. The Project Area Supplemental Educational
Revenue Augmentation Fund (SERAF) takeaway is estimated at $5,374,000 for FY
2009-10 and $1,106,000 for FY 2010-11. In order to make the payment, the
Redevelopment Agency has been allowed to suspend all of its required 20% allocation
to its low and moderate income housing fund. The 20% portion of the payment will be
repaid in equal payments by June 30, 2015.
5. City General Fund Repayment — The Agency assumes that the outstanding
indebtedness to the City General Fund will be repaid annually with a repayment
schedule that increases approximately 2% annually.
6. Discretionary Expenditures - To the extent future tax increment revenue resources
continue to be allocated to the Agency and exceed existing debt service, contractual
obligations, projects and administrative costs, the cash flow projection assumes that the
Agency will exercise its discretion in funding other future projects, programs or activities
of benefit to the Project Area through FY 2013-14.
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Pane 21
Tax Increment Revenue General Assumptions
1. The current FY 2008-09 tax increment revenue, as disbursed by the Orange County
Auditor-Controller, provide the basis from which future year tax increment is determined.
2. Future real property (land and improvement) values annually increase as a result of an
annual 2% inflation factor (reflecting assumed Proposition 13 growth) commencing in FY
2010-11.
3. The housing set aside of 20% of annual tax increment is reflected pursuant to the
provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2.
4. Tax sharing obligations and triggered statutory pass through payments, pursuant to the
provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33607.7, are incorporated in the tax
increment revenue projections, as applicable.
Based upon the assumptions listed above, the table below forecasts the Agency budget for fiscal
years 2009-10 through 2013-14.
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
General Tax Increment Funds
Beginning Cash Balance 3,914,000 859,000 366,000 739,000 1,736,000
Revenue
Tax Increment Revenue 17,761,000 18,699,000 20,332,000 22,536,000 23,997,000
Other Interest and Revenue 1,024,000 963,000 969,000 751,000 872,000
18,785,000 19,662,000 21,301,000 23,287,000 24,869,000
Expenditures/Fees
SERAF(Supplemental Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund)State Budget Takeaway 5,374,000 1,106,000
Loan and Repayment-Housing Fund -3,552,000 - 888,000 888,000 888,000
Housing Set Aside 3,740,000 4,067,000 4,508,000 4,800,000
Tax Sharing Agreements
and
Statutory Pass Through Payments
Annual Payments 2,213,000 2,407,000 2,793,000 3,348,000 3,648,000
Debt Repayment
1999 Tax Allocation Bonds 749,000 747,000 748,000 743,000 747,000
2002 Tax Allocation Bonds 1,622,000 1,622,000 1,636,000 1,641,000 1,638,000
Agency Administration Expenses 2,935,000 2,431,000 2,515,000 2,604,000 2,641,000
Other Debt Expenses 3,504,000 3,536,000 3,567,000 3,597,000 3,630,000
Discretionary Expenditures 134,000 57,000 115,000 271,000 517,000
Capital Expenditures 4,440,000 - - - -
City General Fund Repayments 4,421,000 4,509,000 4,599,000 4,690,000 4,783,000
Total Expenditures 21,8409000 20,155,000 20,928,000 22,290,000 23,292,000
Ending Cash Balance 859,000 366,000 739,000 1,736,000 3,313,000
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 - 2014 Implementation Plan Pave 22
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN
The Agency has completed an Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan
January 2010-December 2014 inclusive of the Affordable Housing Component required of
Implementation Plans. The Affordable Housing Component will be adopted concurrently with this
Implementation Plan. The Affordable Housing Component identifies a funding plan and activities
related to the production of affordable housing for persons of low and moderate income for the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project and the Southeast Coastal Project Area.
Pacific Court
Now
/ ul-
- � ,
i
Before After
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project
2009 — 2014 Implementation Plan Page 23
CONCLUSION
Throughout the last five-year period the Agency has focused its efforts on the elimination of
economic and physical blight, improving the economic vitality, increasing the economic base,
and providing the community with adequate retail and service opportunities within the Project
Area. In order to successfully accomplish these efforts the Agency has been working closely
with the private sector.
The efforts of the Agency resulted in the development of successful public-private partnerships
to revitalize the Downtown, the City's beach front areas, as well as the former Huntington
Beach Mall (now known as Bella Terra). Bella Terra represents a substantial revitalization
project that serves as an entry to the City and created a regional destination for shopping,
dining and entertainment. A second phase of Bella Terra will provide a number of different land
uses and will link the development to the Edinger and Beach Boulevard Corridor.
The Agency plans to achieve the goals set forth in this Implementation Plan by investing in
public infrastructure projects, such as the undergrounding of utilities along major corridors
which will provide an incentive for investment and new development. The Agency will
participate in projects that focus on blight elimination and economic revitalization on parcels that
remain blighted within the Project Area.
Exhibit A
Everest Cir.
1155,4 yAry ry5 h,5p ,S�hAyry ry,Aq��
Etna Or s3s
`'A6'1•`�' `5 0^',yb 15372 15311 1531
y°9, ^ ry 153821 1 J 15?8 pis
�S4�ry� k 15392 15391 `1538191539
1540 Y 15402 i54p1 E 15411 0.541 -
<� 1541215411 L 1542 1542
1542215421�11-3 g1543
= 15432 15431 i�15451 1545
15452 15451 547
� �^ � 15481 154tL
Su ar Dr.
McFadden Ave.
w
m
to
0
C7
� _o ❑ 0
Edinger Ave. ---- — -- ---- .�
i
I
J1k
(�-AtdricY�Dr. ' p
c
J
LoF e Cir. —J °
Vol a Dr.'
c N
w Stark Dr. t'
d
c
Murd Cir. t� -
Amazon Dr.
Information Services Department
Huntington Beach N Alh_d
S
Redevelopment Profect wE No E b I20(fl
Huntington Center ,Subarea CAUTION
WHEN USING THIS MAP
0 200 400 600
City of Huntington Beach
Feet
r,1Mm.e�„II
\\I t001994\projects\Eton m i cDevelopment\Redevelopment\RedevProjectH unti ngton CenterSubarea.mxd
Exhibit B
7 .
J'
I
`tlNarner�4ve..
Fir Dr.
c
J
Scam Dr.
c J �
_a
@ M c c
N m J J
wi y E
w
Cypress Dr.
Cyp`iess Dr. �—
c
J
E ,
w =
c m .
J
N
O
o U
z (0
N`
Mandrell Dr. Kristin Cir:
c I
J
O x'
N
O
Y Barton Dr.
Win
J I J J
U c o.
3 � N
Wagon D TCU
0
Slater.Ave.
n VF1 irl
J
Information Services Department
Huntington Beach N ^y
sm ;; ity
Redevelopment Project W � E -UIS 2 y
November 007
View
TT ,�®\y' n I
Oak ♦ iew Subarea � CAUTION
I� WHEN USING THIS MAP
0 200 400
City of Huntington Beach aamb ¢
Feet
\\It0019941projects\Econom ieDevelopment\Redevelopment\RedevProjectOakViewSubarea.mxd
Exhibit C
E `o
m �
Windfield Dr. c
0
J 00C]
0
Talbe Ave
J
U 75
Po
O
c 3 o
a) .a.
IY ,a� c . Happy Dr.
o m
Y
/ a. rchid Dr.
UL
��ytJ Lori Dr.
Qa.
J
U �
O
L
me r. q
J M
Taylor Dr.£ WL
Ontario Dr.-,
:�T
J,
'c
J,.
_= � _:' __ T
� d
nton Cir. Quebec Dr. E
A
mE,
O N
'C N
Information Services Department
Huntington Beach N �y
us
Redevelopment Project wE No�b 2007
Talbert-Beach Subarea CAUTION
WHEN USING THIS MAP
0 200 400
City of Huntington Beach
Feet
innMroveriry eii
\\It001994\prof eds\Econom icDevel opment\Redevel opm ent\RedevProjectTal bertBeach Subarea.mxd
Exhibit D
-u� Seab
y
t
:
Y3 t�
a Park'St.
Widhtta Ave
41-Venice Ave ,�-7:4 4
LA —n�
tioa N. r e. i i _J — Q _
Toronto Ave
a
W:Springfield Avesz _ h $pririgfeld 4ve: " °.
L
AD
Information Services Department
Huntington Beach N At
Redevelopment Project w � � Nob,2007
Yorktown-Lake Subarea S �
0 200 400
City of Huntington Beach `� �a ,�
Feet
\\It001994\projects\Econom icDevelopment\Redevelopment\RedevProjectYorktownLakeS ubarea.mxd
Exhibit E
uLJi
00
dFU
. 9
,
Information Services Department
Huntington
Beach
each
N Ab_��
Redevelopment Profect w (Us
� NoaHB bI2007
,(®�'yp' (/-�� //-dry
�I in®Pier Subarea � CAUTION
Y' (,Q, ) WHEN USING THIS MAP
0 0.25 0.5
City of Huntington Beach Milessa reMsoe,Mssav
ieiiMw.el1'aii
\\It001994\projects\Econom ieDevelopment\Redevelopment\RedevProjectMai nPierSubarea.mxd
ATTACHMENT #2
e ® ® ' ® A A
IR
THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 21, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS...............................................................................1
II. HISTORICAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES..................................................................3
A. Agency Activities ................................................................................................................4
B. City Activities.......................................................................................................................6
III. PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES....................................................................6
A. Activities Funded with Set-Aside and HOME Funds........................................................6
B. Activities Funded with Affordable Housing Fees...........................................................11
C. Workforce Housing Program............................................................................................12
IV. APPLICABLE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS......................................................13
A. Applicable Housing Production Requirements..............................................................13
B. Housing Development in the Project Areas....................................................................14
C. Existing and Anticipated Inclusionary Housing Obligations........................................15
D. Existing and Projected Inclusionary Housing Production Units..................................15
E. Net Inclusionary Housing Production Surplus/(Deficit) ..............................................16
V. APPLICABLE DEPOSIT AND EXPENDITURE PROVISIONS....................................................17
A. Cash Flow Projections......................................................................................................17
B. Proportional Expenditures of Affordable Housing Fund Monies .................................19
C. Excess Surplus Calculation .............................................................................................21
VI. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.........................................................................................................21
VII. SUMMARY OF PLANNED AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITY..............................................22
I. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA), the Huntington Beach Redevelopm ent Agency's
(Agency)financial consultant prepared the following Affordable Housing Component of the
Agency's Implementation Plan. This Affordable Housing Component aggregates the
requirements imposed on the Huntington Beach Project (Merged) and the Southeast Coastal
Redevelopment Project Area.
The Affordable Housing Component identifies a funding plan and activities related to the
production of affordable housing for persons and families of low and moderate income. The
Implementation Plan covers the period between January 2010 and December 2014. However,
various California Redevelopment Law (CRL) restrictions also require the Agency to create
plans for affordable housing activities through December 2014, and then again through the end
of the Project Areas' life.
The CRL provides that a fundamental purpose of redevelopment is to expand the supply of I ow
and moderate income housing (Section 33071).' To accomplish this purpose, the CRL contains
numerous provisions to guide redevelopment agency activities with regard to low and moderate
income housing. These provisions divide a redevelopment agency's housing responsibilities
into the following three major categories:
1. The production and/or replacement of low and moderate income housing;
2. The set-aside and expenditure of specified amounts of property tax increment revenue
for the express and exclusive purpose of increasing, improving and preserving a
community's supply of low and moderate income housing; and
3. Preparing reports on how the Agency has met, or preparing plans on how the Agency
will meet, its responsibilities with regard to the first two items.
This Affordable Housing Component of the Implementation Plan is one of the Agency's
responsibilities under the third major category. Its contents address how the Agency's plans for
the Project Areas will achieve the affordable housing requirements imposed by the CRL. The
Affordable Housing Component must address the following items:
1. Production of Affordable Housing Based on Activities in the Project Areas:
The CRL income definitions are found in the following Sections: Moderate Income Section 50093; Low
Income Section 50079.5; and Very-Low Income Section 50105.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 1
a. At least 30% of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed
by a redevelopment agency shall be provided at affordable housing cost to low
and moderate income households (Section 33413(b)(1)).
b. At least 15% of all new residential units developed in a redevelopment project
area, by public or private entities other than the redevelopment agency, shall be
provided at affordable housing cost to low and moderate income households.
This requirement also includes all substantially rehabilitated units that have
received agency assistance (Section 33413(b)(2)).
C. If a project identified in the Implementation Plan results in the removal of units
occupied by low or moderate income households, the Implementation Plan must
identify suitable locations for replacement housing units to be developed or
substantially rehabilitated (Section 33490(a)(3) and Section 33413(a)).
2. Set-Aside and Expenditure of Property Tax Increment for Housing Purposes:
a. Twenty-percent (20%) of the gross property tax increment (Set-Aside funds)
must be placed in a separate Affordable Housing Fund to be used solely to
increase, improve and preserve the community's supply of low and moderate
income housing (Section 33334.2).
b. Set-Aside funds must be spent on very-low, low and moderate income housing in
proportion to the unmet need for housing as defined in S ection 65584 of the
Government Code. The unmet need for housing is identified in the Regional
Housing Needs Assessment(RHNA) for the City of Huntington Beach (City)
which is prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) (Section 33334.4).
C. A cap is applied to the amount of Set-Aside funds that can be spent on h ousing
that is subject to age restrictions. The limit is equal to the percentage that very-
low and low income households over the age of 65 represent of the total very-low
and low income population in Huntington Beach, based on United States Census
data (Section 33334.4).
d. Set-Aside funds can only be used to construct infrastructure and public
improvements if the improvements are an integral part of the new construction or
rehabilitation of housing units that are subject to long-term income and
affordability covenants, and are directly benefited by the improvements (Section
33334.2).
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 2
e. Set-Aside funds can only be used to fill the gap between the am ount of external
financing that can be supported by a project, and the total project costs. If more
than 50% of the project costs are funded by the redevelopment agency, a finding
must be made that no other commercial funding sources could be reasonably
obtained (Section 33334.3)
3. The Implementation Plan must also include the following information:
4. Estimates of the balances and deposits into the "Affordable Housing Fund" created to
hold the Set-Aside funds;
5. A housing program identifying expenditures from the Affordable Housing Fund;
6. A description of the housing activity that has occurred in the Project Areas; and
7. Estimates of housing units that w ill be produced in the P roject Areas for each of the
various income categories.
All of this information is provided in the following sections of the Affordable Housing Component
of this Implementation Plan.
II. HISTORICAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES
The first area within the Project Area now known as the Huntington Beach Project (Merged)was
adopted in 1982. The Southeast Coastal Project was not adopted until 2002, and no residential
development has occurred within this Project Area. As such, all the Agency's historical
affordable housing activities have taken place in the Huntington Beach Project (Merged) or in
portions of the city not located i n a Project Area.
The Agency and the City have i mplemented a broad based affordable housing pr ogram over the
past 27 years. These projects and programs include new development of rental and ownership
housing; substantial rehabilitation of rental housing; purchases of long-term income and
affordability covenants on existing apartment projects; and grants and loans for minor
rehabilitation projects.
In the early 1990's the City initiated a policy requiring affordable housing units to be integrated
into new market rate housing developments. The City formalized the policy into an Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance in 2004 that imposes income and affordability requirements on new
residential development with three or more units.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 3
The Ordinance allows projects with three to 30 units to pay a fee in-lieu of producing the units;
these funds will be deposited in the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The Ordinance also
provides the City Council with the latitude to allow developers, in limited circumstances, to
transfer the responsibility for producing the units to the Agency i In return for making a
contribution to the "Housing Development Fund". Both the Affordable Housing Trust Fund and
the Housing Development Fund are administered by the Economic Development Department.
The bulk of the Agency assistance to affordable housing projects and programs is derived from
Set-Aside funds. However, the City also receives HOME Program and Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD); these funds are transferred to the Agency to supplement the Set-
Aside.
A. AGENCY ACTIVITIES
His torica/Activities
From the adoption of the Huntington B each Project (Merged)through June 30, 2004, the
Agency assisted approximately 720 affordable housing units. These projects can be
summarized as follows:
1. Between fiscal years 1983/84 and 1993/94, the Agency assisted 132 very-low, low and
moderate income units located outside the Huntington B each Project (Merged).2 The
assistance to these projects was an eligible use of Set-Aside funds, but the units cannot
be counted towards the fulfillment of Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production
requirements.3
2. Between fiscal years 1994/95 and 2003/04, the Agency assisted in the creation of 588
affordable housing units. The projects' names and characteristics are identified in Table
3, and the project types can be summarized as follows:
a. 93 apartment units were developed or substantially rehabilitated within the
Huntington Beach Project (Merged).
2 The projects are the 40-unit Huntington Village Senior Apartment Project, the 44-unit Brisas del Mar
Project and the 48-unit Five Points Senior Apartment Project.
3 Prior to January 1, 1994, Section 33413(b)inclusionary housing production credit could only be received
for units located within a redevelopment project area.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 4
b. 195 apartment units were developed or substantially rehabilitated outside the
Huntington Beach Project (Merged).
C. Six very-low income home ownership units were constructed outside the
Huntington Beach Project (Merged) by Habitat for Humanity with Agency
assistance.
d. The Agency purchased long-term income and affordability covenants on 294
apartment units located outside the Huntington Beach Project (Merged).
Previous Five-Year Implementation Plan Period Activities
During the previous Implementation Plan period, the Agency completed the following affordable
housing activities:
1. Five apartment projects, totaling 28 units, were substantially rehabilitated in the Oakview
neighborhood. The Agency assistance to these projects included $5.37 million in Set-
Aside funds and $2.24 million in HOME Program funds. These projects embodied the
following characteristics:
a. All 28 units are available to families with children.
b. The unit mix includes 21 very-low income units and seven low income units.
2. A total of 165 units were assisted outside of the Project Areas. These projects received
approximately $10.73 million in Set-Aside assistance and $544,000 in HOM E Program
assistance. The projects can be described as follows:
a. A 106 unit single-room occupancy project was developed. This project includes
47 units that qualify under the low income definition, and 59 units that meet the
moderate income definition.
b. The 48-unit Pacific Court project was acquired and substantially rehabilitated.
These units are all available to families with children. The unit mix includes 24
very-low income units and 24 low income units.
C. The remaining 11 units include four units undertaken by Colette's Children's
Homes; three units developed by Habitat for Humanity; and four other new
development units. These units are all available to families with children, and the
affordability mix includes nine very-low income units and two low income units.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 5
B. CITY ACTIVITIES
The City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires that at least 10% of the residential units be
subject to long-term income and affordability covenants. Nearly 500 income restricted units
have been developed since the C ity began implementing an inclusionary housing policy in 1993;
these units are all being counted toward the fulfillment of the City's RHNA goals.
The affordable housing covenants required by City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance are
intended to comport with the inclusionary housing production requirements imposed on the
Agency by Section 33413(b). However, given the timing, location, and covenant monitoring in
place on the existing units developed under the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirements,
the Agency is currently limited to receiving Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production
credit for approximately 148 units.
III. PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES
A. ACTIVITIES FUNDED WITH SET-ASIDE AND HOME FUNDS
The array of affordable housing development being considered in this Affordable Housing
Component includes:
Bella Terra ll Residential Component
The developer of the Bella Terra I retail/entertainment center and the City are currently
negotiating the terms of a Development Agreement for the Bella Terra II project. As currently
proposed, the mixed-use project will include 390 residential units, of which 23 units will be set
aside for very-low income households and 36 units will be provided to moderate income
households. These units will be subject to income and affordability covenants that run for 55
years.
The development scope has not yet been finalized. T he scope that is ultimately agreed upon by
the parties will include a 15% affordable housing component that comports with the Section
33413(b) inclusionary housing production requirements.
The developer and the Agency are currently negotiating the terms of an assistance agreement
related to the affordable housing component of the m ixed-use project. The assistance will be
derived solely from the following sources:
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.0041015
Page 6
1. The Set-Aside funds generated by the Bella Terra I and II projects; and
2. A portion of the unrestricted property tax increment generated by Bella Terra 11 will be
transferred into the Affordable Housing Fund, and used to assist the affordable housing
units.
The assistance package is being structured as an interest-bearing loan from the developer to
the Agency. The debt service payments will terminate at the earlier of full repayment of
principal and interest balance or when the Huntington Beach Project (Merged) ceases to
collected property tax increment.
Oakview Neighborhood
Acquisition and Rehabilitation Proiects
The Agency began a revitalization program for the Oakview neighborhood in 1994. Between
fiscal years 1994/95 and 2008/09, the Agency assisted in the acquisition and substantial
rehabilitation of 97 units in 15 projects. The Agency also engaged Jam boree Housing
Corporation, a designated Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO), to create
programming to benefit the residents throughout the Oakview neighborhood.
The initial strategy is to assemble contiguous parcels, and to undertake initial rehabilitation work
limited to bringing the properties to a decent, safe and sanitary quality level. The projects can
be described as follows:
1. During the first year of this Implementation Plan, the Agency is planning to undertake the
following projects:
a. Jamboree Housing Corporation is currently rehabilitating their fourth project in
the Oakview neighborhood. This project was assisted with Set-Aside and HOM E
Program funds.
b. A vacant site located is proposed to be acquired by Colette's Children's Home.
This site is proposed to be developed with eight units, and consolidated with the
adjacent 10 unit Colette's Children's Home project that was approved by the
Agency during the last Implementation Plan period. The project is proposed to
be funded with federal National Stabilization Program (NSP)funds, HOME funds,
and Set-Aside funds.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 7
2. During the period between fiscal years 2010/11 and 2014115, this Implementation Plan
includes a strategy to use Set-Aside and HOME funds to assist 50 units. The average
subsidy amount, in 2010 dollars, is estimated at approximately $350,000 per unit.
Overall Strategy
The ultimate objective is to create a vibrant neighborhood that continues to be occupied by a
diverse mix of residents. Recognizing that local serving retail uses are needed by the residents,
KMA evaluated the opportunity for including retail in the development mix. However, based on
an analysis of the site selection criteria imposed by typical retailers, it was the KMA conclusion
that there is an insufficient number of residents in the primary trade area; and the streets do not
generate sufficient traffic to attract typical retail tenants. To kick-start retail opportunities, the
City is working with the Oakview Revitalization Partnership to attract a local farmers market to
the neighborhood and w ill continue to pursue efforts to attract business opportunities.
Given the development constraints, KMA focused the strategic planning process on mixed-
income residential development, the creation of a pleasant environment for the residents
throughout the neighborhood, and the need to create a uniform operating standard for the
various projects that have or will receive Agency assistance. To maximize the impact on the
neighborhood, and to create the ability to leverage outside funding sources to defray the
Agency's Affordable Housing Fund expenditures, this Affordable Housing Component is based
on the following assumptions:
1. The Agency will work closely with Oakview Task Force to ensure that proposed
development and activities meet the needs of the existing community.
2. The Agency will work with nonprofit developers designated as CH DO's to undertake
these projects. The selected developers will currently be involved in the neighborhood,
or will come to the Agency with site control for the proposed project.
3. The selected developers will focus on assembling contiguous parcels.
4. To the extent it is financially feasible within the assistance parameters identified by the
Agency, the projects will be required to include sustainable design features such as:
a. Energy and water reduction strategies;
b. Building design that maximizes sunlight for heat and light, and maximizes air flow
for natural cooling;
C. Solid waste reduction technologies;
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 8
d. Storm water mitigation; and
e. Gray water recycling.
This strategy will provide the Agency with the opportunity to group the rehabilitation projects
together to maximize the effect; and/or to replace the existing projects with efficiently designed
new development projects geared to the needs exhibited within the community. If the new
development option is ultimately selected, it is likely that the Agency will be required to issue a
bond secured by Set-Aside funds to obtain sufficient funds to complete the strategy. In addition,
it is assumed that the selected developer(s)would be obtaining outsi de leveraging such as Low
Income Housing Tax Credits (Tax Credits) to defray the Agency's costs.
The Oakview neighborhood is located within the Huntington Beac h Project (Merged). Any
substantial rehabilitation projects undertaken with Agency assistance, and any new
development undertaken with or without assistance, will trigger Section 33413(b) inclusionary
housing production obligations. However, it is assumed that the Agency assisted development
will provide a sufficient number of units to fulfill the obligations.
Emerald Cove Acquisition and Substantial Rehabilitation Project
The Agency developed the 164-unit Emerald Cove senior apartment project in fiscal year
1984/85. Jamboree Housing Corporation purchased the project from the Agency in fiscal year
2009/10 for $8.04 million. The purchase price is structured as a residual receipts loan that will
be repaid from the net cash flow generated by the project each year. These debt service
payments will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund.
Jamboree Housing Corporation obtained tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond financing and 4%
Tax Credits to undertake a substantial rehabilitation scope that is anticipated to be completed
during fiscal year 2009/10. No Agency assistance is being provided to the project.
The Agency and Jamboree Housing Corporation executed 60-year income and affordability
covenants that require the project to include 120 very-low income units and 42 low income units.
The project also includes two on-site manager units.
First-Time HomebuyerpownpaymentAssistance Program
The Agency established the Homebuyer Assistance Program to encourage home ownership in
Huntington Beach for low and moderate income households. The program is designed to
provide assistance to reduce housing related costs to the affordable amount as defined in
Section 50052.5. The Agency intends to allocate $1.05 million to this program annually.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 9
Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production obligations do not apply to units assisted
under the First-Time Home Buyer Downpayment Assistance Program. Similarly, the assisted
units cannot be counted towards the fulfillment of inclusionary housing production requirements.
Mixed-Use Projects on Commercial Corridors
Transportation corridors in Huntington Beach provide opportunities for mixed-use commercial
and residential development. Those projects located within the Project Areas will create Section
33413(b) inclusionary housing production obligations for the Agency to fulfill. However, it is
possible that some of the production requirements will be fulfilled in the following ways:
1. These projects may be subject to the on-site development requirements imposed by the
City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance; and
2. Some developers may agree to comply with the income and affordability requirements
imposed by the State of California density bonus (SB1818)to achieve greater
development intensity.
To maximize the chances that the projects will provide income restricted units on site, mixed-
use zoning should only be applied to sites that are appropriate for urban style development.
Further, the Agency can consider providing financial assistance to the projects to ensure that
the Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production requirements are fulfilled.
Projects Assisted with Revolving Loan Funds
The rehabilitation loan program is funded with loan repayment proceeds received by the City
from existing rehabilitation loans. These loans were originally funded with CDBG,funds, and to
comply with the CDBG requirements the participants are limited to very-low and low income
households. At the beginning of fi scal year 2009/10, the program had outstanding I oans totaling
$3.18 million.
The basic program terms are:
1. The program is limited to single-family home ownership units. For the purposes of this
program, single-family homes are defined as developments that include between one
and four units.
2. The loan cap is set at $75,000 per unit, with the potential to increase the amount to
$90,000 administratively.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 10
3. Participants are allowed to use the funds to inc Jude features designed to improve the
home's energy efficiency.
4. No repayment of principal or interest is required until the home is resold or refinanced to
draw down cash.
5. The loans bear 3% simple interest.
It is projected that five loans will be funded per year. However, the number of loans will
ultimately be tied to the amount of debt service payments received, and the actual amounts
committed to each loan.
The CRL imposes Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production obligations on units that
receive redevelopment agency assistance to undertake substantial rehabilitation. The
rehabilitation loan program is not intended to trigger Section 33413(b) requirements, nor are the
units intended to fulfill production obligations, for the fol lowing reasons:
1. The loan program is not funded with Agency monies; and
2. The loan program is not intended to be used for projects that meet the substantial
rehabilitation test defined by the CRL. For reference purposes, substantial rehabilitation
is defined as 25% or more of the after-rehabilitation value of the horn e.
B. ACTIVITIES FUNDED WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEES
Housing Development Funds
The Affordable Housing Plan for the Pacific City Project requires Makallon Atlanta Huntington
Beach, LLC (Makallon) to contribute$20 million to the Housing Development Fund. In return for
receiving this payment, the Agency must fulfill a defined portion of the Pacific City Project's
affordable housing obligations. Specifically, the Affordable Housing Plan for the Pacific City
Project requires the Agency to cause 117 very-low, low, and median income units to be
constructed or otherwise created within the M erged Project Area.4
4 The specific requirement is for 39 very-low, 39 low and 39 median income units distributed among
studio to three-bedroom units.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 11
The Agency is planning to use some or all of the Makallon payment to fulfill the requirements
identified in the Affordable Housing Plan. It is currently anticipated that the Agency will use the
funds to assist the Studios at Center project that will include 140 units allocated as follows:
1. 39 very-low income units;
2. 39 low income units; and
3. 62 moderate income units.
The 2.7-acre Studios at Center site is located on McFadden Avenue adjacent to Golden West
College. The site is located within the Project Areas, and the development will trigger Section
33413(b) inclusionary housing production requirements. The project will be subject to 55-year
income and affordability covenants. Therefore, the units will also qualify as inclusionary housing
production units.
/nc/usionary Housing In-Lieu Fees
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance allows developers of projects with three to 30 units to pay
a fee in lieu of producing affordable housing units on-site within a market rate project. The in-
lieu fee revenues will be contributed to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The use of the
monies in the Affordable Housing Trust Fund are guided by the Incl usionary Housing
Ordinance.
C. WORKFORCE HOUSING PROGRAM
The Agency has established an objective to provide home ownership opportunities to
households that cannot afford to purchase a home in Huntington Beach, but that do not qualify
for assistance under the statutory definitions of low and moderate income households. To that
end, the Agency would like to create a "Workforce Housing" program.
The proposed Workforce Housing program will focus on providing home ownership
opportunities for City employees, school teachers in the local school districts, and major
employers with Huntington Beach that are interested in working with the Agency to provide
housing through a matching grant program. This program would provide down payment
assistance funds to the purchasers of existing homes within Huntington Beach. Based on this
structure, the proposed program will neither trigger nor fulfill Section 33413(b) inclusionary
housing production requirements.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 12
IV. APPLICABLE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
A. APPLICABLE HOUSING PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS
The affordable housing production requirements imposed on the Project Areas are discussed in
the following sections of this report.
Replacement Housing Obligation
The Agency must fulfill the replacement housing obligations im posed by Section 33413(a). The
Agency must replace, on a one-for-one basis, all units removed from the low and moderate
income housing stock as a result of Agency actions.
If an implementation plan includes projects that could result in the removal of low and moderate
housing units, the implementation plan must identify locations suitable for the replacement of
such housing. This Implementation Plan does not include any projects or programs that would
result in the removal of housing units from the low and moderate income housing stock;
therefore, no replacement housing obligations are considered in this Implementation Plan.
lnclusionary Housing Production Obligation
The Agency is required to comply with the affordable housing production requirements imposed
by Section 33413(b). The requirements can be summarized as follows:
1. Subparagraph (1) requires at least 30% of all housing units developed by the Agency to
be low and moderate income housing subject to long-term income and affordability
covenants. Of this total, at least 50% of the units must be set-aside for very-low income
households. The Agency has no plans to develop units in the future. As such, the
Agency is not anticipated to incur any obligations under this provision of the CRL.
2. Subparagraph (2) of Section 33413(b) imposes the following requirements:
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 13
a. At least 15% of all housing developed in the Proj ect Areas, by parties other than
the Agency, must be low and moderate income units subject to long-term income
and affordability covenants. This requirement also applies to Agency assisted
substantial rehabilitation projects.5
b. At least 40% of the required low and moderate income units must be affordable
to persons and families of very-low income. The covenants for the remaining
units can be set at the low or the moderate income level.
C. These requirements apply to both housing developed by private parties, and to
housing developed wi th Agency assistance by parties other than the Agency.
d. These requirements are applied on a cumulative basis over time, rather than on
a project-by-project basis.
The following sections of the Implementation Plan review past and anticipated housing
development activity in the Project Area to quantify the Agency's inclusionary housing
production obligations. These sections also identify the manner in which the Agency plans to
fulfill the defined inclusionary housing production obligations duri ng the following periods:
1. The current five-year Implementation Plan period;
2. The 10-year period commencing on January 1, 2005 and terminating on December 31,
2014; and
3. Throughout the remaining life of the Project Area.
B. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROJECT AREAS
The first component of the Huntington Beach Project(Merged) was adopted in 1982 and the
land use controls terminate for the entire area in 2024. The Southeast Coastal Project was
adopted in 2002 and the land use controls terminate in 2032. To assist in identifying the
Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production obligations, the residential development
within the Project Areas must be identified for the period between the Area's inception and the
termination of the land use controls.
5 This includes private development, and development that receives Agency assistance but is not
developed by the Agency.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 14
As shown in Table 1, it is estimated that 2,470 residential units were developed within the
Huntington Beach Project (Merged) between fiscal years 1982/83 and 2003/04. It is anticipated
that 1,985 units will be developed between 2005 and 2024. No residential development has
occurred in the Southeast Coastal Project since its inception in 2002, and none is currently
anticipated to occur through the end of the Project Area's life.
C. EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED INCLUSIONARY HOUSING OBLIGATIONS
The currently outstanding incl usionary housing obligation, and the anticipated future obligations,
total 675 units.6 The time frame under which these obligations must be fulfilled is detailed in
Table 2, and can be summarized as follows:
Production Obligation
Very-Low Low/Mod
Timing Income Income Total
December 31, 2004 66 98 164
December 31, 2014 98 140 238
Project Area Termination 111 162 273
Total 275 400 675
D. EXISTING AND PROJECTED INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PRODUCTION UNITS
Table 3 lists the affordable housing production units that have already been completed, and
projects the future activity based on the projects recommended for implementation in this
Affordable Housing Component. Table 3 only includes affordable housing units that qualify for
Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production credit. The categories of units are:
1. Project Areas:
a. Agency Assisted Housing Units; and
b. City Inclusionary Units
6 The obligation calculation is based on 10-year measurements, and rounds up any fraction of an
obligation unit.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 15
2. Outside Project Areas:
a. Agency Assisted Housing Units;
b. City Inclusionary Units; and
C. Agency Covenant Purchases.
Completed and anticipated inclusionary housing production units are summarized in the
following table:
Very-Low Low/Mod
Timing Income Income Total
Qualified Units Produced Through:
June 30, 2004 128 277 405
June 30, 2014 250 282 532
Termination of the Project Areas 0 0 0
Total Qualified Production Units 378 559 937
E. NET INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PRODUCTION SURPLUS /(DEFICIT)
The Agency is required to measure inclusionary housing production as of December 31, 2004,
December 31, 2014, the end of the Huntington B each Project (Merged) life in 2024, and the end
of the Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Project in 2032. The results of this analysis are
summarized in the following table:
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.0041015
Page 16
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative
Obligation Fulfillment Surplus/(Deficit)
December 31, 2004
Very-Low Income 66 128 62
Low/Moderate Income 98 277 179
Total 164 405 241
December 31, 2014
Very-Low Income 164 378 214
Low/Moderate Income 238 559 321
Total 402 937 535
End of Project Area Life
Very-Low Income 275 378 103
Low/Moderate Income 400 559 159
Total 675 937 262
The Agency has fulfilled all the inclusionary housing production requirements currently imposed
on the Project Areas. The Agency is anticipated to generate a production surplus through the
end of the Project Areas' life.
V. APPLICABLE DEPOSIT AND EXPENDITURE PROVISIONS
A five-year cash flow projection is presented in Table 4. This cash flow projection provides an
illustrative example of how the Affordable Housing Program could be financed on an annual
basis over the five-year Implementation Plan period. However, the timing and specific amounts
of the expenditures may be adjusted over time. Specific decisions on each of these items will
be made as part of the Agency's annual budget process.
A. CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS
Affordable Housing Fund Revenues
The Affordable Housing Fund revenues shown on Tabl e 4 include the followi ng:
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.0041015
Page 17
1. The Project Areas are subject to.the Section 33334.2 requirement to allocate 20% of the
gross property tax increment to affordable housi ng activities. The property tax increment
projection used in this analysis was prepared by the City's Finance Department.
2. The HOME Program grants allocated by HUD to the City are transferred to the
Affordable Housing Fund. The fiscal year 2009/10 estimate is based on the actual
allocation received by the City. The allocation amount is held constant thereafter.
3. The payment amounts for the revolving loans that were originally funded with the City's
CDBG allocation vary from year-to-year. This Affordable Housing Component is
premised on the assumption that the rehabilitation loan commitments in each year will
be directly tied to the amount of the debt service payments received by the Agency in
that year.
4. During the Implementation Plan period, the Agency is anticipated to receive $20 million
in Housing Development Fund revenues from Makallon Atlanta Huntington Beach, LLC
for the Pacific City Project. These funds are anticipated to be received over a two-year
period; a $15 million payment is projected to be received in fiscal year 2012/13, and a $5
million payment is projected to be received in fiscal year 2013/14.
5. In-lieu fee revenues will be generated by three to 30 unit residential projects that choose
to pay a fee in lieu of producing the affordable housing units required by the Inclusionary
Housing Ordinance. The amount of fee revenue that will be generated is too speculative
to predict at this time.
6. The City's CDBG allocations are transferred to the Affordable Housing Fund to pay the
costs associated with administering the rehabilitation loan program. The deposit is
estimated at$160,000 in fiscal year 2009/10, and $125,000 per year thereafter.
7. The City's Finance Department has projected that starting in fiscal year 2012/13,
residual receipts debt service payments will be received from the Emerald Cove senior
apartment project.
8. The City was awarded $375,000 N SP funds in fiscal year 2009/10. These funds will be
deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund.
9. Interest will be earned on the funds available in the Affordable Housing Fund each year.
The interest rate is projected at 3%, and it is applied to the average balance in the
Affordable Housing fund during the previous year.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 18
Affordable Housing Fund Expenditures
Table 4 also illustrates the costs anticipated to be incurred by the Agency from the Affordable
Housing Fund. These costs can be described as follows:
1. Operating costs include planning and administration; general operating expenses; and
rehabilitation loan program administration costs. These projections were provided by the
Agency staff.
2. The Agency must make debt service payments to the City annually on an existing loan
for the Emerald Cove senior apartment project. The debt service payments are set at
$405,000 per year.
3. The future program and project cost projections are based on the estimates detailed
previously in this Affordable Housing Component.
State Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
The State has created an Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (S/ERAF) that is funded
with redevelopment revenues. The State imposed a S/ERAF obligation in fiscal year 2008/9
that was successfully challenged in the courts. However, the State created a restructured
S/ERAF, and imposed it on redevelopment agencies for fiscal years 2009/10 and 2010/11.
The S/ERAF legislation allows the Agency to use Set-Aside funds to pay for some or all of the
obligation. However, if Set-Aside funds are used, the contribution must be treated as a loan that
will be repaid no later than fiscal year 2014/15. The Agency is planning to use Set-Aside funds
to pay for $3.55 million of the obligation in fiscal year 2009/10.7 This Implementation Plan is
based on the assumption that the Set-Aside funds will be repaid in four installments of$888,000
per year between fiscal years 2010/11 and 2013/14.
B. PROPORTIONAL EXPENDITURES OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND MONIES
The Project Areas are subject to the Section 33334.4 requirement that the Agency expend Set-
Aside funds in accordance with an income proportionality test and an age restriction
proportionality test. Section 33334.4 also provides redevelopment agencies with the discretion
to include other locally controlled public revenue sources in the proportionality tests. These
'The S/ERAF taking is currently being challenged in the courts. If the taking is ultimately ruled
unconstitutional, this Implementation Plan will be amended to reflect the additional funding availability.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 19
proportionality tests must be met between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2014, and in 10-
year increments through the termination of the Project Areas' life. The results of the
proportionality tests are presented in Table 5, and described in the following sections of the
Affordable Housing Component.
Income Proportionality Test
The income proportionality test requires the Agency to expend Set-Aside funds in proportion to
the unmet housing needs that have been identified for the community pursuant to Government
Code Section 65584. The proportionality test used in this Affordable Housing Plan is based on
the 2006 RHNA figures prepared by SCAG. The RHNA established the following unmet need
for affordable housing in Huntington Beac h:
Category Threshold
Very-Low Income: At least 37%
Moderate Income: No more than 33%
The following table identifies the actual expenditures between January 1, 2002 and June 30,
2009, and the projected expenditures for the balance of the Implementation Plan period:
Income
Time Period Very-Low Low Moderate Total
1/1/02-6/30/09 $15,554,865 $7,277,302 $342,466 $23,174,633
FY2009/10 1,633,834 1,557,808 1,050,000 4,241,642
FY 2010/11 1,894,295 1,578,580 1,050,000 4,522,875
FY 2011/12 1,989,010 1,657,509 1,050,000 4,696,519
FY 2012/13 2,088,461 1,740,384 1,050,000 4,878,845
FY 2013/14 2,192,884 1,827,403 1,050,000 5,070,287
FY 2014/15 2,959,830 1,918,773 1,517,646 6,396,249
Total $28,313,180 $17,557,759 $7,110,112 $52,981,050
% of Total 53.44% 33.14% 13.42% 100%
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 20
This Implementation Plan allocates approximately 53% of the Affordable Housing Fund's project
and program expenditures to very-low income households, 33% of the funds to low income
households and 13% of the funds to moderate income households. These expenditures all
exceed the parameters established by the current proportionality requirements. Therefore, the
Agency is anticipated to meet the income targeting standards imposed by Section 33334.4.
Age Restricted Housing Proportionality Test
Section 33334.4 also requires that the Agency cap assistance to age restricted housing based
on the percentage that very-low and low income households over the age of 65 represent of the
total very-low and low income population in Huntington Beach. Based on 2000 United States
Census data, the very-low and low income senior citizen population represents 30% of the very-
low and low income population in Huntington Beach.
The Affordable Housing Component allocates 5.5% of the Set-Aside and HOME Program funds
to senior citizen housing projects. Thus, the Agency is anticipated to fulfill the age restricted
housing expenditures test imposed by Section 33334.4.
C. EXCESS SURPLUS CALCULATION
The Project Areas are subject to the "excess surplus" requirements imposed by Section
33334.12. Excess surplus is defined as any unexpended and unencumbered funds in the
Affordable Housing Fund that exceeds the aggregate amount of Set-Aside funds generated
during the Project Areas' preceding four fiscal years. Based on the Section 33334.12
requirements, the Agency has three years to encumber any excess surplus funds.
As illustrated in Table 5, the Agency is not projected to incur an excess surplus balance at any
time during the current Implementation Plan cycle. It is not anticipated that the Agency will
experience an excess surplus balance throughout the Project Areas' remaining life.
VI. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The CRL requires that certain housing requirements be fulfilled during five- and 10-year
increments; and over the remaining Project Areas' life. Specifically, the inclusionary housing
production requirement must be met every ten years, and over the life of the Project Areas.
Comparatively, the proportionality tests must be achieved between January 1, 2002 and
December 31, 2014, and then again in 10-year increments throughout the Project Areas' life.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 21
The Agency's primary goal is to comply with the affordable housing requirements imposed by
the CRL in a responsible manner. The affordable housing activities identified in the
Implementation Plan will be undertaken over the duration of the Project Areas, and will explicitly
assist in accomplishing the intent of the CRL in regards to the provision of low and moderate
income housing.
V11. SUMMARY OF PLANNED AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITY
This section of the Affordable Housing Component discusses the Agency's affordable housing
activities planned for the Implementation Plan period. Table 4 projects the Affordable Housing
Fund deposits and expenditures anticipated to occur during each year of the Implementation
Plan period. These expenditures are then tied to estimates of the number of affordable housing
units projected to be assisted by the Agency.
Given the successful implementation of the proposed housing program, the Agency will have
accomplished the following:
1. The Agency will fulfill the Section 33413(b) inclusionary housing production requirements
for the 10-year period between fiscal years 2004/05 and 2014/15.
2. By the end of fiscal year 2014/15, the Agency will have fulfilled all the Section 33413(b)
inclusionary housing production requirements anticipated to be incurred throughout the
entire life of the Project Areas.
3. The Agency's expenditures of Set-Aside funds will comply with the proportionality tests
imposed by Section 33334.4.
4. The Agency will not experience excess surplus in any fiscal year throughout the
remaining Project Areas' life.
Implementation Plan:Affordable Housing Component 0912006.HTB:KHH:gbd
January 1,2010—December 31,2014 14066.004/015
Page 22
TABLE 1
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN -JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Completion Units Built in
Year Project Construction Type Project Area
I. Completed Development Through FY 1993/94
1983/84- 1993/94 Private Housing Production New Construction 1,090
II. Completed Development: FY 1994/95-2003/04
1994/95-2003/04 Private Housing Production New Construction 1,182
1993/94 OCCHC- 17372 Keelson Subst Rehab with Assistance 4
1993/94 Shelter for the Homeless-Barton#1 Subst Rehab with Assistance 4
1993/94 Shelter for the Homeless-Keelson Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
1994/95 No Housing Construction 0
1995/96 OCCHC Koledo#1 Subst Rehab with Assistance 25
1995/96 Pacific Park Villas New Construction 38
1996/97 OCCHC Koledo#2 Subst Rehab with Assistance 8
1996/97 OCCHC Queens Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
1997/98 No Housing Construction 0
1998/99 No Housing Construction 0
1999/00 OCCHC Koledo#3 Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
1999/00 OCCHC Koledo#4 Subst Rehab with Assistance 6
1999/00 Plaza Almeria New Construction 42
2000/01 Interval House Subst Rehab with Assistance 6
2000/01 OCCHC Koledo#5 Subst Rehab with Assistance 5
2001/02 Ash Street Condos New Construction 6
2001/02 Bowen Court Senior Apartments New Construction 20
2001/02 Shelter for the Homeless-Barton#2 Subst Rehab with Assistance 4
2003/04 No Housing Construction 0
Total Completed Development: FY 1994/95-2003/04 1,380
III. Completed Development: FY 2004/05-2008/09
2004/05 Sea Colony New Construction 78
2004/05 Colette's-#1 Oakview Subst Rehab with Assistance 4
2005/06 Sea Cove New Construction 106
2006/07 Jamboree-Oakview#1 Subst Rehab with Assistance 5
2006/07 Jamboree-Oakview#2 Subst Rehab with Assistance 5
2007/08 Jamboree-Oakview#3 Subst Rehab with Assistance 4
2008/09 Colette's-#3 Oakview Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
Total Completed Development: FY 2004/05-2008/09 212
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name: HB Strategy_12_21_09;Development Page 1 of 2
TABLE 1
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN -JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Completion Units Built in
Year Project Construction Type Project Area
IV. Anticipated Development: FY 2009/10-2014/15
2009/10 Emerald Cove Subst Rehab with Assistance 164
2009/10 Jamboree-Oakview#4 Subst Rehab with Assistance 5
2009/10 Colette's-#4 Oakview Subst Rehab with Assistance 8
2010/11 Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
2011/12 Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
2012/13 Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
2013/14 Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
2013/14 Bella Terra Residential New Construction 390
2014/15 Studios at Center New Construction 140
2014/15 Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects Subst Rehab with Assistance 10
2014115 Pacific City Residential New Construction 516
2009/10-2014/15 Private Housing Production New Construction 500
Total Anticipated Development: FY 2009/10-2014/15 1,773
V. Anticipated Development: Remaining Project Area Life
No Housing Construction Anticipated 0
VI. ITotal Housing Development 4,455
Includes all units built by private entities,substantially rehabilitated units with Agency assistance,Agency assisted new
development and Agency developed units.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name: HB Strategy_12_21_09;Development Page 2 of 2
TABLE 2
INCLUSIONARY HOUSING OBLIGATION ANALYSIS'
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Obligation
Very-Low Low/Mod
Fiscal Year Total Income Income
I. Annual Obligation
2003/04 164 66 98
2004/05 180 72 108
2005/06 10 4 6
2006/07 3 2 1
2007/08 0 0 0
2008/09 0 0 0
2009/10 9 4 5
2010/11 2 1 1
2011/12 5 2 3
2012/13 0 0 0
2013/14 13 6 7
2014/15 16 7 9
2015/16 2 1 1
2016/17 1 1 0
2017/18 2 1 1
2018/19 27 11 16
2019/20 2 1 1
2020/21 2 1 1
2021/22 2 1 1
2022/23 60 24 36
2023/24 175 70 105
II. Periodic Obligation
2003/04 164 66 98
2014/15 238 98 140
2023/24 273 111 162
2031/32 2 0 0 0
III. Total Obligation 675 275 400
%of Total 100% 41% 59%
' Based on California Health&Safety Code Section 33413,which requires at least
15%of all units built in the Project Area to be subject to income&affordability
covenants. Of the affordable units,at least 40%must be restricted to very-low
income households.
2 Only applies to the Southeast Coastal Project.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name: HB Strategy_12_21_09;Obligation
TABLE 3
INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FULFILLMENT ANALYSIS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Total Income Total Very-Low LIM
Covenant Restricted Units Countable Income Income
Project Term 1 Produced Units 2 Units Units
Projects Completed 1982-June 30,2004
I. Agency Assisted Within Project Areas
OCCHC- 17372 Keelson 1994-2024 4 4.0 3.0 1.0
Shelter for the Homeless-Barton#1 1994-2024 4 4.0 4.0 0.0
Shelter for the Homeless-Keelson 1994-2024 4 4.0 4.0 0.0
OCCHC Koledo#1 1996-2026 10 10.0 10.0 0.0
OCCHC Koledo#2 1997-2027 8 8.0 8.0 0.0
OCCHC Queens 1997-2027 8 8.0 8.0 0.0
OCCHC Koledo#3 2000-2060 10 10.0 10.0 0.0
OCCHC Koledo#4 2000-2060 10 10.0 10.0 0.0
Interval House 2001-2029 6 6.0 0.0 6.0
OCCHC Koledo#5 2001-2060 5 5.0 5.0 0.0
Bowen Court Senior Apartments 2002-2062 20 20.0 0.0 20.0
Shelter for the Homeless-Barton#2 2002-2030 4 4.0 4.0 0.0
Total 93 93.0 66.0 27.0
II. City Inclusionary Units Within Project Areas
Pacific Park Villas 1996-2026 25 25.0 0.0 25.0
Ash Street Condos 2002-2062 6 6.0 0.0 6.0
Total 31 31.0 0.0 31.0
III. Agency Assisted Outside Project Areas
OCCHC PSS-313 11th St. 1994-2024 9 4.5 0.0 4.5
Bridges Apartments-Nichols 1997-2027 80 40.0 0.0: 40.0
Habitat for Humanity-Ronald Road 1997-2027 3 1.5 1.5 0.0
Habitat for Humanity-Yorktown 2001-2060 3 1.5 1.5 0.0
Fountains Senior Apartments 2003-2062 80 40.0 27.5 12.5
Main Place Apartments 2004-2033 26 13.0 0.0 13.0
Total 201 100.5 30.5 70.0
IV. City Inclusionary Units Outside Project Areas
Greystone Keys 1993-2023 23 11.5 0.0 11.5
Cape Ann 2000-2030 146 73.0 0.0 73.0
The Promenade 2000-2030 80 27.0 0.0 27.0
The Tides 2004-2034 12 6.0 0.0 6.0
Total 261 117.5 0.0 117.5
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09:Fulfillment Page 1 of 3
TABLE 3
INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FULFILLMENT ANALYSIS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Total Income Total Very-Low L/M
Covenant Restricted Units Countable Income Income
Project Term 1 Produced Units 2 Units Units
V. Agency Covenant Purchase Outside Project Areas
Sea Aire Apartments 1996-2026 36 18.0 0.0 18.0
Sher Lane Apartments 2003-2028 66 33.0 8.0 25.0
Huntington Pointe Apartments 2003-2061 104 52.0 10.5 41.5
Hermosa Vista Apartments 2004-2063 88 44.0 13.0 31.0
Total Potential Units 294 147.0 31.5 115.5
Actual Countable Units 3 63.0 31.5 31.5
Total Units Produced through 6130/04 880 405.0 128.0 277.0
Projects Completed July 1,2004-June 30,2009
I. Agency Assisted Within Project Areas
Colette's-#1 Oakview 60 Years 4 2.0 2.0 0.0
Jamboree-Oakview#1 60 Years 5 5.0 4.0 1.0
Jamboree-Oakview#2 60 Years 5 5.0 5.0 0.0
Jamboree-Oakview#3 60 Years 4 4.0 4.0 0.0
Colette's-#3 Oakview 60 Years 10 10.0 4.0 6.0
Total 28 26.0 19.0 7.0
II. Agency Assisted Outside Project Areas
Beachview Villas SRO° 2006-2066 106 53.0 0.0 53.0
Colette's-#2 Outside Project Area 60 Years 4 2.0 2.0 0.0
Habitat-Delaware 60 Years 1 0.5 0.5 0.0
7912 Newman Street 60 Years 2 1.0 0.0 1.0
Ellis/Patterson 60 Years 2 1.0 1.0 0.0
Habitat-Ellis&Beach 60 Years 2 1.0 1.0 0.0
Delaware-Pacific Court 60 Years 48 23.5 11.5 12.0
Total 165 82.0 16.0 66.0
Total Units Produced 7/1/05-6/30/09 193 108.0 35.0 73.0
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09:Fulfillment Page 2 of 3
TABLE 3
INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FULFILLMENT ANALYSIS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN -JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
Total Income Total Very-Low L/M
Covenant Restricted Units Countable Income Income
Project Term 1 Produced Units 2 Units Units
Anticipated Production July 1,2009-June 30,2014
I. Agency Assisted Within Project Areas
Emerald Cove 60 Years 164 162.0 120.0 42.0
Jamboree-Oakview#4 60 Years 5 5.0 5.0 0.0
Colette's-#4 Oakview 55 Years 8 8.0 3.0 5.0
Bella Terra Residential 60 Years 59 59.0 23.0 36.0
Studios at Center 55 Years 140 140.0 39.0 101.0
Oak View Acquisition/Rehab Projects 60 Years 50 50.0 25.0 25.0
Total 426 424.0 215.0 209.0
Total Anticipated Production 7/1/09-6/30/14 426 424.0 215.0 209.0
Total Anticipated Production 7/1/05-6/30/14 619 532.0 250.0 282.0
Totai Production in Plan 1,499 937.0 378.0 559.0
1
Projects subject to agreements executed prior to January 1,2002 must have covenants that run at least as long as the land use
controls imposed by the Redevelopment Plan(2024). The covenants for projects from 2002 forward must run for at least 55 years
for rental projects and 45 years for ownership projects.
2
Units located within the Merged Project Area can be counted on a 1:1 basis;50%credit is applied to units located outside the
Merged Project Area. Prior to 1994, units outside the Merged Project Area could not be used to fulfill the inclusionary housing
production requirements.
3 At least 50%of units for which covenants are purchased, but substantial rehabilitation is not performed, must be set-aside for very-
low income households.
4 The project received density bonus benefits, but did not receive Agency financial assistance.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09:Fulfillment Page 3 of 3
TABLE 4
CF PROJECTION-AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
I. Beginning Balance $7,492,960 $2,891,584 $2,160,147 $1,434,658 $15,784,498 $20,511,305
II. Revenues
Housing Set-Aside Funds
20%Gross Tax Increment 2 $3,563,000 $3,750,000 $4,077,000 $4,376,000 $4,735,000 $5,104,000
Transfer from Bella Terra II 3 0 0 0 0 0 425,572
HOME Funds 4 830,000 830,000 830,000 830,000 830,000 830,000
Revolving Loan Repayments 420,000 441,000 463,050 486,203 510,513 536,038
Housing Development Fund 6 0 0 0 15,000,000 5,000,000 0
Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fees' 0 0 0 0 0 0
CDBG' 160,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000
Emerald Cove Residual Receipts Loan 9 0 0 0 51,697 130,787 161,961
Other Revenue 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
NSP Award 375,000
Repymt S/ERAF Loan from Hsg 0 888,000 888,000 888,000 888,000 0
Interest on Available Balance 11 192,866 155.768 75,776 53,922 258,287 544,437
Total Revenues $5,540,866 $6,189,768 $6,458,826 $21,810,822 $12,477,587 $7,727,008
III. Operating Expenses
Planning and Administration
Set-Aside Funds 12 $1,280,600 $1,344,330 $1,411,747 $1,482,934 $1,556,981 $1,633,980
HOME Program Funds 13 83,000 83,000 83,000 83,000 83,000 83,000
Rehabilitation Loan Program 160,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000
Housing Loan for S/ERAF Pymt 3,552,000
Emerald Cove Debt Service 2 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000
Bond Debt Service
Total Operating Expenses $5,480,600 $1,957,330 $2,024,747 $2,095,934 $2,169,981 $2,246,980
IV. Available for Projects/Programs $7,553,226 $7,124,022 $6,594,227 $21,149,546 $26,092,105 $25,991,334
V. Proposed Projects/Programs
Jamboree-Oakview#4 t4 1,391,642
Colette's-#4 Oakview 15 1,800,000
Bella Terra II Residential 16 1,124,948
Studios at Center 17 13,158,000
Oak View Projects'' 0 3,472,875 3,646,519 3,828,845 4,020,287 4,221,301
Down Payment Assistance 19 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000
SFH Rehabilitation Loan Program 20 315,000 330,750 347,288 364,652 382,884 402,029
SFH Emergency Grant Program 21 105,000 110,250 115,763 121,551 127,628 134,010
Total Proposed Projects/Programs $4,661,642 $4,963,875 $5,159,569 $5,365,047 $5,580,800 $20,090,288
VI. Ending Balance $2,891,584 $2,160,147 $1,434,658 $15,784,498 $20,511,305 $5,901,046
Prepared by:Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09;CF Page 1 of 2
TABLE 4
CF PROJECTION-AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDS
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
Footnotes:
Based on actual available balance reported by the Agency for FY 2006/7.
2 The projections for FY 2009/10 through FY 2014/15 are based on Agency assumptions.
3
Based on an assistance package proposed by the Agency in November 2009. The
revenue is equal to 50%of the 80%funds generated by Bella Terra II. The tax increment
projection was prepared in November 2009.
4 Actual revenues for FY 2009/10. The amount is held constant each year thereafter.
s
The loans funded each year thereafter will not exceed the repayment revenues received
by the Agency.
6
This revenue source is developer payments made to the Agency in return for the Agency
fulfilling the developer's inclusionary housing obligations.
7
This revenue source is comprised of in-lieu fee payments received for projects that meet
the criteria established in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
8 Limited to the funds necessary to pay the Rehab Loan Program administrative costs.
9 Based on a cash flow projection prepared in July 2009.
10
Includes:Loan Payments;Administrative Cost Bonds;Miscellaneous;ERAF Repayment
from 80%Funds;and Main-Pier Loan Repayment.
11
Estimated based on a 3%interest rate on the average of the Beginning and Ending
Balance in each year from FY 2009/10 forward.
12
Administration costs are based on Agency projections for the period between FY 2009/10
-FY 2014/15. Attorney's Office and Professional Services Contract costs for FY 2009/10
are based on Agency budget. These costs are increased at 5.0%annually thereafter.
13 Set at 10%of the annual HOME Program allocation.
14
Received Agency approval in FY 2008/9 and funded in FY 2009/10. The assistance is
allocated as follows:$880,346 in Set-Aside funds and$511,296 in HOME funds.
15
Based on$600,000 in site assemblage costs and$150,000 per unit in direct financial
assistance. The assistance is allocated as follows:$375,000 in NSP funds;$830,000 in
HOME funds;and$595,000 in Set-Aside funds.
16
Based on an assistance package proposed by the Agency in November 2009. The
assistance is drawn from 100%of the Set-Aside funds generated by Bella Terra I and II,
and 50%of the 80%tax increment generated by Bella Terra 11.
17
The Agency owns the development site. The assistance is estimated at$132,000 per
very-low income unit;$110,000 per low income unit;and$60,000 per moderate income
unit. The weighted average assistance is$93,986 per unit.
18
The projections are based on a subsidy cost of$330,750/unit in FY 2009/10 escalated at
5%annually thereafter. The assistance is funded with Set-Aside and HOME funds
19
The Program was approved by the Agency in FY 2008/9. The assistance will be targeted
to moderate income households.
20
The projections are based on an average subsidy cost of$63,000/unit in FY 2009/10
escalated at 5%annually thereafter.
21
The projections are based on an average subsidy cost of$10,500/unit in FY 2009/10
escalated at 5%annually thereafter.
Prepared by:Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09;CF Page 2 of 2
TABLES
EXCESS SURPLUS&PROPORTIONALITY TEST
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN-JAN 2010-DEC 2014
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA
FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
I. Excess Surplus Analysis
Beginning Balance-Set-Aside Funds $6,021,425 $2,419,345 $2,175,908 $1,938,419 $1,724,562 $1,808,582
Revenues
Housing Set-Aside Funds $3,563,000 $3,750,000 $4,077,000 $4,376,000 $4,735,000 $5,529,572
Total Miscellaneous Revenues 0 0 0 0 0 0
Repymt S/ERAF Loan from Hsg 0 888,000 888,000 888,000 888,000 0
Interest Earnings 192,866 155,768 75,776 53,922 258,287 544,437
Total Revenues $3,755,866 $4,793,768 $5,040,776 $5,317,922 $5,881,287 $6,074,009
Expenditures-Set-Aside Funds
Planning and Administration $1,280,600 $1,344,330 $1,411,747 $1,482,934 $1,556,981 $1,633,980
Operating Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0
Housing Loan for S/ERAF Pymt 3,552,000 0 0 0 0 0
Project/Program Expenditures 2,525,346 3,692.875 3,866,519 4,048,845 4,240,287 5,566,249
Total Expenditures-Set-Aside Funds $7,357,946 $5,037,205 $5,278,265 $5,531,779 $5,797,267 $7,200,229
Ending Balance $2,419,345 $2,175,908 $1,938,419 $1,724,562 $1,808,582 $682,363
Maximum Allowable Balance $13,721,000 $14,111,000 $14,902,000 $15,766,000 $16,938,000 $18,292,000
Excess Surplus $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
II. Proportionality Tests: Set-Aside,HOME&NSP Expenditures
Completed Projects:January 1,2002+
Very-Low Income $15,554,865
Low Income 7,277,302
Moderate Income 342,466
Future Projects
Very-Low Income $1,633,834 $1,894,295 $1,989,010 $2,088,461 $2,192,884 $2,959,830
Low Income 1,557,808 1,578,580 1,657,509 1,740,384 1,827,403 1,918,773
Moderate Income 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,050,000 1,517,646
Total Expenditures $27,416,275 $4,522,875 $4,696,519 $4,878,845 $5,070,287 $6,396,249
Income Proportionality Test Threshold Actual
Very-Low Income 37% 53.4%
Low Income 30% 33.1%
Moderate Income 33% 13.4%
Age Restricted Housing Test Threshold Actual
Maximum Exps-Age Restricted Housing 30.0% 5.5%
Minimum Exps-No Age Restrictions 70.0% 94.5%
Prepared by:Keyser Marston Associates,Inc.
File name:HB Strategy_12_21_09;Tests
COMMUNICATION REGARDING:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER APROVAL OF THE FIVE-YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (2010-2014) AND THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT AB 1290
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2010 - DECEMBER
2014 FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MERGED
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
CITY OF COSTA MESA
` CALIFORNIA 92628-1200 P.O.BOX 1200
— FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
December 11, 2009
Attention: Mayors and Council Members of Orange County Cities
SUBJECT: LETTER OF SUPPORT OF AB 1590 (SOLORIOITRAN) —
STOP SALE OF OC FAIRGROUNDS
On behalf of the residents of Costa Mesa, we wanted to express our sincere gratitude for the
outpouring of support and quick actions by the County, cities, and other agencies in Orange
County to help preserve the Orange County Fair and Event Center (OCFEC). Many agencies
have already adopted resolutions and/or sent letters to the Governor to express support for
stopping the sale of this local treasure. If your agency has not yet adopted a resolution or sent
a letter of support, we have attached a sample resolution and letter for your consideration. Our
collective actions and clear message to the Governor are making a positive impact that will
hopefully lead to the discontinuation of the sale.
We are again asking for your assistance in the preparation of letters of support from your
agency. Assemblyman Jose Solorio and Assemblyman Van Tran are jointly authoring
Assembly Bill 1590. AB 1590 is an urgency bill that was just introduced to repeal the section of
Assembly Bill X4 22 related to the sale of the OCFEC. AB 1590 will be considered by the State
legislature in the next few weeks and your immediate attention is needed. Because this is
urgency legislation, approval will require a 2/3 vote of both houses and therefore letters of
support to State legislators is needed to clearly express strong support from Orange County.
Also, attached is a sample letter of support for AB 1590 along with a copy of the Bill for your
review. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
Torn Hatch, Assistant City Manager, at (714) 754-5288.
Sincerely,
Allan R. Mansoor Wendy Leece Eric R. Bever
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Co cil Member
AC
Gu
Katri Fole Gary Monaha�
Council Member Council Member
Attachments: Sample Letter to the Governor to Stop the Sale of the OCFEC
Sample Resolution to Stop the Sale of the OCFEC
Sample Letter of Support for AB 1590
AB 1590 Bill Text
77 FAIR DRIVE
PHONE: (714)754-5285 • FAX (714)754-5330 • TDD, (714)754-5244 • www.d.cosla-mesa.cams
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA
November 11,2009
WHEREAS,the fast Orange County Fair occurred in 1890 and has since thrived as a
"Celebration of Orange County's Communities,Interests and Heritage"as is stated in the
Orange County Fair and Event Center mission statement;and
WHEREAS,as a result of the State of California's budget deficit of over$26 billion,the
largest in the state's history,Governor Arnold Sehwarzenegger proposed the sale of
surplus or underutilized assets for the purpose of helping to close the budget deficit;and
WHEREAS,on duly 28,2009 the Orange County Board of Supervisors passed
Resolution#09-110,in support of Governor Schwarzenegger's proposal to sell the
Orange.County Fairgrounds,only if the sale provided that the Fairgrounds would be sold
to a local government agency or local not-for-profit corporation to perpetuate its use as a
fairgrounds,event center, and equestrian facility;and
WHEREAS,on October 7,2009,the California Department of General Services released
a Request for Proposals for the sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds;and
WHEREAS,the Request for Proposals does not require the buyer to be a local
government agency or local not-for-profit,nor does it require the buyer to perpetuate the
utilization of the property as a fairgrounds,event center,and equestrian facility;and
WHEREAS,the Orange County Fairgrounds is the only asset of its kind the State is
actually proposing to sell and relinquish control over;and
WHEREAS,the Orange County Fairgrounds are wholly contained within the corporate
limits of the City of Costa Mesa;the City of Costa Mesa's General Plan designates the
property as"Fairgrounds";the City of Costa Mesa has zoned the property
"recreadonallinstitudonal";and
WHEREAS,the Costa Mesa City Council has authorized preparation of a Specific Plan
for the Fairgrounds property and subsequently directed staff to prepare a ballot initiative
for the June 2010 ballot for voter approval of a Iand use restriction to"Fairgrounds';and
WHEREAS,the Orange County Board of Supervisors believes that it is the best interests
of the public that the Governor immediately cancel the sale of Fairgrounds property;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE Pll'RESOLVED THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS does hereby request that Governor Schwarzenegger
immediately cancel the sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds;and
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED,THAT THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS,does hereby respectfully call upon all other cities in Orange County to
join with the County of Orange and the City of Costa Mesa in formally requesting of the
Governor that the proposed sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds be cancelled
immediately.
Resolution No.09-180 Itern No.S49A page I of I
Request to Cancel the Propsed Sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds
The foregoing was passed and adopted by the following vote of the Orange County Board of
Supervisors, on November 24,2009,to wit:
AYES: Supervisors: JOHN M.W.MOORLACH,BILL CAMPBELL,JANET NGUYEN
PATRICIA BATES
NOES: Supervisor(s):
EXCUSED: Supervisor(s): CHRISNORBY
ABSTAINED: Supervisor(s):
G
CHAT N
STATE OF CALMORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I,DARLENE J.BLOOM, Clerk of the Board of Orange County,California,hereby
certify that a copy of this document has been delivered to the Chairman of the Board and that
the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Orange County
Board of Supervisors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and seal,
DA NWJ.BLOOMA-
Clerk of the Board
County of orange,State of California
Resolution No: 09-1 S0
Agenda Date: 1I/24i2009
Item No: 849A
f certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the Resolution
adopted by the Board of Supervisors,Orange County,State of California
DARLENF J.BLOOM;Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:
Depuly
,
CITY OF COSTA MESA
CALIFORNIA 92628-1200 P.O.BOX 1200.
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
November 30, 2009
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
1S( Floor State Capitol
Sacramento, California 95814
SUBJECT: SALE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS/
32ND AGRICULTURAL. DISTRICT
Honorable Governor Schwarzenegger:
Please Stop the Sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds -- NOW!
As the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa, we collectively request your intervention
in .halting the sale of the Orange County Fairgrounds (OCF) owned by the State of
California. The urgency of this request is the result of the Department of General
Services' RFP for the sale of the property as early as January 2010.
As communicated to your office in 2004 and again as recently as June 2009 (please
see attached resolutions), our City is adamantly opposed to the sale of the OCF and
any change in its current use as a Fair and Event Center. The sale and change in use
is likewise opposed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors (please see attached
resolution). Most importantly, the sale is strongly opposed by the residents of. Orange
County (please refer to the enclosed, supporting material).). The State's action to place
the property up for sale jeopardizes hundreds of jobs both in the private as well as the
public sector; hundreds of small businesses; cultural, educational and agricultural
programs in addition to the annual Orange County Fair — one of the most successful
fairs in the Western United States. The Fairgrounds generates an estimated $180
million in economic activity annually providing employment and tax revenue.
Our opposition to the sale and closure of the OCF is not without a recognition and
appreciation for the State's dire financial situation. As a local government entity, we are
dealing with many of the same tough fiscal decisions. . The advisement to sell the
property was provided to you without ANY consultation with the City beforehand. From
the erroneous report by the Office of the Senate Floor Analysis to the current DGS
process to the questions being raised regarding the OC Fair Board in reconstituting
itself as a non-profit to bid on the property, we believe this entire process to be seriously
flawed. We have 'included additional background information to this letter that goes into
these matters in greater detail.
77 FAIR DRIVE
PHONE; (714)7645285 FAX: (714)754-5330 • TOD: (714)754.52,14 • vAm.ci.cosla-masa.cams
As Governor, you have called for greater collaboration between all levels of government
in our great State during these challenging times. The Costa Mesa City Council calls on
your leadership in doing exactly that by stopping the sale of the Orange County
Fairgrounds and working with local government and the people to find workable
solutions.
Respectfully,
Allan R. Mansoor Wendy Leece
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern
V
Eric R. Bever atrina= oley Gary onahan
Council Member Coun&Wrnber Council Member
Enclosures; City of Costa Mesa Resolutions
County of Orange Resolution
Public Testimony DVD
Petition CD
SAMPLE LETTER OF SUPPORT -AB 1590
December—, 2009
California State Senator/California State Assembly Member
State Capitol Room
Sacramento, California 95814
SUBJECT; REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF AB 1590 (SOLORIO/TRAN)--
ORANGE COUNTY FAIR; STOP SALE OF STATE PROPERTY
Dear
On behalf of the residents of and for the millions of residents in Orange County that support and
visit the Orange County Fairgrounds, we strongly request your support of Assembly Bill 1590. This Bill,
introduced by Assemblyman Jose Solorlo, would repeal the section of Assembly Bill X4 22 related to the
sale of the Orange County Fair and Event Center (OCFEC). The Bill also calls for the State to conduct
hearings in Orange County and Sacramento on the flawed sales process if the sale is not stopped. We
wish to echo Assemblyman Solorio's words when introducing this legislation — "it is not in the best
interest of California or Orange County to sell this valuable property."
We understand that the action to sell OCFEC was taken in an effort to generate additional revenue
during this time of severe financial crisis for California. The land is designated in our local General Plan
as a Fairgrounds. This will not change. For the State to sell this valuable resource in a down real estate
market as a Fairgrounds will not generate anywhere near the original revenue estimate, and therefore
the sale will have little positive impact on the budget crisis. Selling this property is just a bad deal for the
State of California. Any individual taxpayer would never sell a cherished asset for such little return.
In addition, the OCFEC is a major entertainment, recreational, cultural and educational asset that
supports both the Local and State economies, resulting in well over a hundred million in annual income
tax proceeds to California. In closing, we urge you to support AB 1590, a vital piece of legislation that
will stop the State from making a bad financial deal for the taxpayers of California.
Sincerely,
Mayor
AB 1590 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page I of 3
BILL NUMBER: AB 1590 INTRODUCED
BILL TEXT
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Solorio
DECEMBER 2, 2009
An act to repeal Sections 3884.1 and 3884.2 of the Food and
Agricultural Code, relating to the Orange County Fair, and declaring
the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1590, as introduced, Solorio. Orange County Fair: sale of state
property.
Existing law divides the state into agricultural districts within
the boundaries of which agricultural associations may be formed.
Existing law creates District 32a from real property commonly known
as the Orange County Fair and authorizes the Department of General
Services to sell all or any portion of the real property that
composes District 32a.
This bill would repeal the provision creating District 32a out of
the Orange County Fair property and would repeal the provision
authorizing its sale by the department. This bill would also repeal
the creation of the District 32a Disposition Fund in the State
Treasury.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as
an urgency statute.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State--mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 3884.1 of the Food and Agricultural Code is
repealed.
3884.1.There is hereby ereabed-Brstiet--3z2a, whieh ----__s_- of
'tt'll of thab?'e'R' rOprr.l-i the_ is __ --_---- - -- ---------- - - ----ems
�Mesa. ,
etlf�eye en-officer-ofrBisbr+eb 92 en e -L^il be e yemid i -G
Biseb .
32. All ._therwise _ -__'1 i __b - e._h-.tea s_._.--- _to jai _ these
4+n Section i@99 of he Go erinitemb eerie, .._�_--_ __ ___-_ ; , Of
S_<<_ __
{Title-9—Fcemmenei-rich-with Section 8-1800) of-rhe 6eve-,i ;ent eo ) ,
sh_ ;--etpp+y to bhe-e ms-of both rB st!rreb 32 and E)isbriel! 92et, ftnel
11� _ on
��.µ^i.il •�e�IrIM-1 -__ �v��_el' bei�l1� -_fT is,�__--71 -________i--fl-ref by
r
SEC. 2. Section 3884.2 of the Food and Agricultural Code is
repealed.
----B 8 8
in the
_ _ ____ __ _
—f-bi`r'The Depetrbiftent
Of General services ff!ety Sell all or Hi4b
poi==bio"--of of real emtpeses Bifobrieb 320. Bi 4t i e t 32a
Shall not ___ter -___O^ ft!!]+ C9Yt�Yftet,lease, or ether agreement
exceeds three Months, and fti+ of these Contracts,-lefts,es, or other
nilitml:file:/A\srv3\DEPTS\CITY MANAGER\COMMON\OCFECIAB 1590 Assembly ... 12/11/2009
AB 1590 Assembly Bill -INTRODUCED Page 2 of 3
ftgreernento shall eenta4:n ft provision thee bhey rftfty be eftneeled "Pon a
38 dey notice from-the Bepet try 9enere+ Serv+ces. The
Bepartmenb of General services Shall be reimbursed for emy teasenable
cost or .--rveel fcr the bond- ---- ---------
section. Additiona-ll!g, (o-Hie--eaten Sbetbe pub
- -
r.l___,_t Bear) -__ -a_,____ _-a_!L-_ !-___l___ t_L_ preperby be L _._lJ -_
nnit-e�the review of allyprepoffed—Sale, begebher - _LL iL__---- --- - - 1
cost of nett!ionetl-lp-reeog**???'d r'n?rtP�Ce�t3lt9 L- shall ,^_ _-_ front bite
'P� ..
proceeds of any seie or-lease-etktherieeH9p--this seet#en. The
- be
B+Sposibien Fund.
she!! be pursuent te * pII�[ bide-__Y process designed t obbetirt
the
higitest, most eertain return for the state from a respensible /
to be the fair _..arts-- balsa for the property. __ notice !4{ thi-s
bidding _ ___--- - hell be ___ by
the
Bepartment_ of ee_nere_ i Berviees
en itsi-nterneb Web s+be for e*+` ieest 38 days pr+o to the ___Y__ of
the realpro'perby. ire-provi'srienti ef. Seetren 94911-1-of the
futhorized"nder __.r_ ____--__:
— (d) Thirty daps prim- to exee"ting _ --=barb---__- for at _ ' _ of
real property- k'or+zed by brts Seebien, the-Bireeber =f __ne==1
$er +ees site+! veper Q! be (±_- ='-__- ei L_ t'-- , r L_
_r »fir r n� i_vi,rii�LLeeZ [ice CS1C
begis+nbute a++ of the
--i1)--The--frna"e i ni-terms-e f the_b r__s__t i__ -
(a) Any bas+n for agreeing to berms end eondibiens other bhftn
c_t__ market
eke _. _!___
fe?—ors to bhe real property Belapdtouenb-be this beebion,ace
Services -L _ -
B3reert�'ar-'ef General _-_-__-_-_ i L--- _'-`_
et++ m+nedesit!s, ers-defined in-Seetien 6499 of M e _t ;__
remove the depesibs. ±f, however, ,.__ ect - of _=nera_ _-=bass--
___ber-•roes bha.at there is little or no j..v.+.+__-rats.. for ...-__---- deposits,
of 590 feet, or the rights to prospeet-tee' "'.-.p; -rtdremove
_ �L
eenveyed that the director debennines be be reetsonetbi!j necessftry for
bite-reme�etai---- the -------_- -
(E-)—+-*"-he Bepartbment- of Aenerec+ set vie_es shot 1 re-port bey--cry
begisifthire-en--or-be€e're-atrrt_ Be
of
___L _-_-__ on the
'__t_ ___ of the
Sa•-e -t _--- _--t--_ _ - t _-r a-s a __ ___-- section.
District 32a Shame--abolished-and--ail funds-+n theeBistricue
---(h) (+) phe disp„esribian of ----= p_-_y ..L :ld_--g_
-(cernmerseing-w+bh ?eetien -2++65) , incittsive of -- ------ 13 -- ----
P"biic eo e. upen .,_.the to the vesting in v' -
pttrchamer or-brans-f-eree-ref the re erl , the p" eh gei or bransferee
shall
L_ll be
subject to em1-_T_'-^_ land
__- --- -- --i-_�---,
2-ieq) to hapter-6- (eemmeneing with S-----n 2 '- 65) , inc-lusive, of
Bivis-ren- :3 of--the Elubl' .
• � G
.-+/ if the -- r=-arras_ _- -rasa re-! property -__ -_--__-_.-__"
mhtml;file://\\srv3\DEPTS\CITY MANAGER\COMMON\OCFEC\AB 1590 Assembly ... 12/11/2009
AB 1590 Assembly Bill - INTRODUCED Page 3 of 3
goverrment-a 1-et=a t2ce entit-ietnerr
by the--1oea! gev�errimeirt tvsth Cimpter-3 with sect+
Biv+s+en +3 of the Pttbiie Resottrees eede, the exeeat�en of
parties t!o^the--agreeftenb s etil 9e—exempt. frefft a apte 3 (ey5MMeney+"q
frkei tSiVe,Of-Dior- }+e Resettr „ , `.:...'e,
r
ffteens the
sae,-lease or-repttYehetse-Of seerte prepert! or b 1d+ngS sp---`--_'
r or bobil-,
P"rs"aftb to bh+s section does nob eonsb+httte et Sale or other
d'isposibien 66 t;ftte su pitts `ropertty with+_ the eteeiting of See bion 9
e£ Article -__ of-the-eali-fermi-a--@rms orr-and she!! nob
SEC. 3. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the
meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate
effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter 20 of the Fourth Extraordinary Session
of the Statutes of 2009 created, and authorized the sale of,
District 32a, which consists of real property in orange County
commonly known as the Orange County Fair. In order to avoid the sale
of the Orange County Fair, it is necessary that this act take effect
immediately.
mlttml:file,/A\srv3\DEPTS\CITY MANAGER\COMMON\OCFEC\AB 1590 Assembly ... 12/11/2009
Page 1.of 1
Esparza, Patty
From: Dapkus, Pat
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:36 AM
To: CITY COUNCIL; Wilson, Fred; City Clerk Agenda
Cc: Emery, Paul
Subject: FW: Letter of Support of AB 1590
Importance: High
Attachments: Ltr Req Supprt AB 1590.pdf
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 4:06 PM
To: Dapkus, Pat
Subject: FW: Letter of Support of AB 1590
Importance: High
I thought you should see this before sending to City Council and Fred as was requested.
From: GOLDSWORTHY, CHRIS [mailto:cgoldsworthy@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 4:02 PM
To: Angi Christensen; Becky Magallon; Brenda Green; Carol Bright; Catherine Salcedo; Fikes, Cathy; Crystal
Wilkerson; Dianne Wilkins; Eva Arevalo; Gail Deebes; Jackie Littler; Jan Sledge; Janice Shore; Jennifer Myers;
Johanna Susi; Judy Baber; Laura Campagnolo; Laura Lopez; Mardy Ousley; Maria Perez; Marilyn Dixon; Mary
Bowron; Michele Lewis; Pam Haddad; Patty Estrella; Paula Colvin; Paula Garrow; Paula Ota; Rae Lynn Gard; Roz
Fox; Susan Ray; Tammie Frederickson; Virginia LaFleur; Virginia Nerio; Wendi Gallatin-Gensel; Yvonne Lee
Cc: SHELTON, KELLY; HATCH,THOMAS
Subject: Letter of Support of AB 1590
Importance: High
Please forward the attached letter to all members of your City Council and your City Manager
as soon as possible. If you have any problems with the attachment or have any questions,
please let me know.
If your Council Members have questions regarding the letter or its attachments, please ask
them to contact Tom Hatch, Assistant City Manager at (714) 754-5288.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Chris Gofi worthy
Evecutive Secretary
City Manager/City Counci(office
(714)754-5327
go[dsworthy@ci.costa-mesa.ca.us
12/14/2009
RCA ROUTING HEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Adopt Five-Year Implementation Plan
and Affordable Housing Component for HB Project Area
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December21, 2009
RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) Attached ❑
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. Attached ❑
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact Statement (Unbudgeted, over $5,000) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached
Not Applicable ❑
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached ❑
Not Applicable
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS
d._
RFVIEWuED RETURNED FOR A DED
Administrative Staff \ C ' yY `�, ( ) )
Deputy City Administrator Initial `'' --
City Administrator Initial
City Clerk \ -'' ( )
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
RCA Author: Powell
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
r Inter®ffflce Communication
TO: Honorable Mayor and Memb s of the City Council ,
h
VIA: Fred A. Wilson, Executive for
FROM: Stanley Smalewitz, Deputy Executive Director_w
r
DATE: December 21, 2009
SUBJECT: Late Communication — Public Hearing Item 7 —Public Hearing to
consider approval of the Five-Year Implementation Plan (2010-2014)
and the Affordable Housing Component AD 1290 Implementation Plan
January 2010 - December 2014 for the Huntington Beach Merged
Redevelopment Project Area.
Attached are two PowerPoint presentations to add to tonight's City Council/Redevelopment
Agency Meeting.
If you have any questions, please call me at extension 5909.
Attachment
7' .__.
Redevelopment Agency of the U = ;
City of Huntington Beach
Five Year Implementation Plan ®®
(2010 to 2014) ®® �
Huntington Beacon
Redevelopment Project
December 2009
see
Implementation Plain Requirements and `®®
Contents
® Implementation Plans must be prepared pursuant to California
Redevelopment Law.
s All redevelopment plans after January 1, 1994 must include an Five
Year Implementation Plan.
o Implementation Plans must be updated every five years:
® Describes the goals and objectives of the Agency which were
established to eliminate blight within the Project Area.
o Describes past, current and future projects and programs
implemented to meet Agency goals and objectives.
s Anticipated Agency expenditures needed to facilitate those
projects and programs described.
,j 1
Goo
Project Area Background
• In 1982 the Agency adopted four(4) separate
redevelopment areas: Main-Pier, Talbert-Beach, Yorktown-
Lake, and Oakview.
• In 1983 the redevelopment plan for the Main-Pier Project
Area was amended to expand the boundaries.
• In 1984 the Agency adopted the Huntington Center
Redevelopment Area (Bella Terra Area).
• In December 1996, the Agency merged the five (5)
redevelopment project areas to form a single project area
entitled the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment
Project Area, which consists of 619 acres.
@so
Agency Goals and Objectives ,
• Eliminate physical and economic blight.
• Assist in business retention and attraction efforts to create jobs.
• Create and preserve affordable housing.
• Renew and create economic activity.
2
coo
Agency Projects during the Past Five Years 000
in the Project Area
The following projects highlight the Agency's past efforts to address the
goals of the Agency:
® Waterfront Project- Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach Resort&
Spa- 500 rooms.
s Waterfront Project-William Lyon Homes: Sea Cove Residential—
106 units.
® Waterfront Project- Christopher Homes: Sea Colony at
Waterfront Residential 78 units.
e®®
Agency Projects daring the Past Five Years ®®
in the Project Area (coat')
® The Strand - 3.97 acres on PCH, CIM to develop hotel, retail,
commercial, restaurant, and office.
Property Acquisition of 7872 Edinger Avenue—Agency
purchased the property from HB Auto to facilitate redevelopment
opportunities on the site.
® Bella Terra- Phase I — Former Huntington Center Mall, regional
shopping destination that includes restaurants, retail, and
entertainment.
3
Goo
Current Agency Projects
• Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan— Intended to create a
more favorable environment for commercial, office, industrial and
residential.
• Downtown Specific Plan — Encompasses the Main-Pier Subarea
and is intended to encourage new development and spur
redevelopment projects.
• Storm Drain Construction — Parallel storm drain at the
intersection of Slater and Parkside.
ON
Current Agency Projects (cost')
• Improvements to Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure:
• ADA upgrades to Art Center, Main Street Library, and fire stations.
• Oakview neighborhood improvements.
• Main-Pier Improvements: visitor kiosk and pier concessionaire
buildings.
• Upgrades to Main Promenade parking structure.
• Undergrounding of utilities along PCH in Main-Pier Subarea.
• Improvements to City Hall.
• Agency Community Outreach:
• Downtown Image Ad Hoc Committee.
• Beach and Edinger Corridors community meetings.
• Surf City Nights.
• Shopping Center Study and Analysis.
• Outreach efforts to promote local job opportunities.
4
coo
00 ,
Future Agency Projects
• Bella Terra Phase IlNillage at Bella Terra:
• Redevelopment of abandoned Montgomery Wards.
• Mixed use project, 155,000 sq.ft.of retail, commercial.
• 300-500 market rate and affordable housing units.
• Atlanta/Beach Center:
• Proposed new commercial development.
• Rehabilitation of existing buildings.
• Edinger Hotel:
• Site located at southeast corner of Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane.
• Attract a high quality, nationally branded hotel.
120 to 150 rooms with amenities.
• Pacific City:
• 31-acre mixed use project.
• 250 room hotel with restaurant/bar, 11,000 sq.ft.of meeting space.
• 516 residential housing units,49,000 sq.ft.- restaurant space, 30,000
sq.ft.-office space, 160,000 sq.ft.of retail space.
®e®
®ON
Future Agency Projects (cunt')
• Redevelopment Plan Amendment:
• Amendment to add commercial properties that exhibit conditions of
physical and economic blight.
• Process to be completed in late 2011/12.
• Undergrounding of Utilities:
• Upgrades anticipated for every year during the five-year period of
the Plan.
• Waterfront Project(Parcel C):
• A third hotel, 150 rooms, spa, fitness facility.
• Will add needed infrastructure upgrades to off-site improvements.
• Increase hospitality opportunities, property tax, sales tax, and
transient occupancy tax.
5
•00
see"
Future Agency Projects (cost') `.
• Agency Property Acquisition:
® Blighted, underutilized, and incompatible properties.
® To assist in the revitalization of the Project Area.
® Business Retention/Property Upgrades:
® Supports the financial strategic goal to fund capital improvements
and enhance financial reserves.
® Public Facilities Improvements:
e Main-Pier Subarea: street and alley improvements, street light
replacement.
® Construction of beach restrooms.
e Oakview Subarea: public improvements to storm drains.
6
AB I. Implementation Plan
Affordable Housing Strategy
Huntington Beach City Council
December 21, 2009
__...._._.
Affordable Housing
Accomplishments
_..__. .... _.. .
.___. . ............... .
_____.._ . ..._......... .
• The Agency assisted 720 affordable housing units
between 1982 and June 2004.
• During the last Implementation Plan period, the
Agency assisted 193 affordable housing units.
• Nearly 500 affordable units have been developed
under the City's Inclusionary Housing Policy
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 2
Basic Affordable Housing
Requirements
• 20% of gross tax increment must be used to
increase, improve and preserve low and moderate
income housing.
• Replacement and Inclusionary Housing Production.
• Expenditure requirements.
• Reporting on how the requirements will be met.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 3
Available Funding Sources
• Set-Aside Funds
• HOME Funds
• Inclusionary Housing In-Lieu Fees
• Revolving Loan Funds / CDBG Funds
• Emerald Cove Senior Apartments Residual
Receipts Loan Repayment
• NSP Funds
• Interest Earnings
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 4
2
State Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund (S/ERAF)
• The State imposed a S/ERAF obligation in
2008/9 that was overturned by the courts.
• The State restructured the S/ERAF, and
imposed it for 2009/10 and 2010/11.
• Set-Aside funds can be used to pay for some
or all of the obligation.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 5
S/ERAF
• Any Set-Aside contribution must be treated
as a loan to be repaid by 2014/15.
• The Agency plans to borrow $3.55 million in
Set-Aside funds in 2009/10.
• The Set-Aside funds are proposed to be
repaid in four installments of$888,000.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 6
3
Proposed Affordable Housing
Activities
• Bella Terra II residential component
• Oakview acquisition and rehabilitation projects
• Emerald Cove senior apartment project
• First-time homebuyer downpayment assistance
• Mixed-use development on commercial corridors
• Rehabilitation loans
• Workforce housing
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 7
Fulfillment of Requirements
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 8
4
Replacement Housing
Requirements
® The Agency must identify units proposed to
be removed by Agency action, and prepare a
replacement housing plan.
. The Agency does not currently have any
replacement housing obligations, and does
not anticipate causing units to be removed.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 9
Inclusionary Housing
Projections
........._...... .._________......__.-
January 1, 2005 —December 31, 2014
Very-Low Low/Moderate Total
Income Income
Obligation 164 238 402
Fulfillment 378 559 937
Surplus 214 321 535
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 10
5
Proportionality Tests
January 2002 — December 2014
• Income — At least 37% of Set-Aside, HOME
and NSP funds must be spent on very-low
income units and no more than 33% can be
spent on moderate income units.
• The Plan calls for 53% of funds to be spent
on very-low income households and 13% for
moderate income households.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page I 1
Proportionality Tests
January 2002 — December 2014
• Age Restrictions — No more than 30% of Set-
Aside funds may be spent on age restricted
housing.
• The Plan calls for 5.5% of Set-Aside funds to
be spent on age restricted housing.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 12
6
Excess Surplus Calculations
• Excess Surplus calculations — No more than
the sum of four years of Set-Aside funds
deposits can be unencumbered.
• The Agency is not projected to incur an
excess surplus balance at any time during the
Implementation Plan cycle.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 13
........_.......
Summary — Implementation Plan
Requirements 2009/10 — 2014/15
• All the Section 33413 inclusionary housing
production requirements will be met.
• The Agency's expenditures will comply with
the proportionality tests imposed by Section
33334.4.
• The Agency will not experience excess
surplus.
December 21,2009 Keyser Marston Associates,Inc. Page 14
7
19
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A)
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING /,:�,/0%'
THE FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT AB 1290
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6063
AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33490(a) THAT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS will hold a public hearing on December 21, 2009 at
6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, located at
2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, for the purpose of considering the adoption of the five year (2009-2014)
implementation plan and affordable housing component for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project.
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach ("Agency") is in the process of formulating a new
Five-Year Implementation Plan ("Plan") and Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan'for
its Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project. As required by Section 33490 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law ("Law"), the proposed Plan will set forth the Agency's goals, objectives, and anticipated
programs, projects, and expenditures for the ensuing five-year period (2009-2014). The Plan will explain how
these components will eliminate blight and increase and improve the supply of affordable housing; and it will
also address the Agency's status in meeting low and moderate income housing requirements. This public
hearing will also address the Agency's consideration to aggregate new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling
units among all of the Project Areas as permitted by Section 33413(b)(2) of the Law. The Law provides that
redevelopment agencies, after consideration at a public hearing, may aggregate such units if they find, based
upon substantial evidence, that the aggregation will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic, or economic
segregation.
Residents or other interested parties may attend these public hearings to offer comments on the Five-Year
Implementation Plan and Affordable Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan. If you wish to obtain
further information about the proposed Implementation Plan and Affordable Housing Component, please
contact Ms. Doris Powell, Huntington Beach Economic Development Agency, at (714) 536-5457.
JOAN L. FLYNN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET—2ND FLOOR
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
(714) 536-5227
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FORM
MEETING DATE: December 21, 2009
Five-Year Implementation Plan and Affordable Housing Component AB
SUBJECT: 1290 Implementation Plan for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
DEPARTMENT: Economic Development
CONTACT NAME: Doris Powell PHONE: X 5457
N/A YES NO
( ) (X) ( ) Is the notice attached?
( ) (X) ( ) Do the heading and closing of the notice reflect a hearing before the City
Council and/or Redevelopment Agency?
( ) (X) ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct?
(X) ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice?
(X) ( ) ( ) Coastal Development Permit, does the notice include appeal
language?
(X) ( ) ( ) Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council?
(X) ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication?
( ) ( ) (X) Is a larger ad required? Size
(X) ( ) ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the
mailing list?
(X) ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
(X) ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
(X) ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing
labels?
(X) ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the resident labels attached?
( ) ( ) (X) Is Summary Report 33433 attached? (Redevelopment Agency items only)
To be Published and Posted November 26, December 3, and December 10, 2009.
What is the minimum number of days from publication to hearing date? 10
What is the minimum number of times to be published? 3 consecutive weeks
What is the specified number of days between publications? 5
FOR ADMINISTRATION AND CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Approved for public hearing Date noticed to newspaper
Date published Date notices mailed
Huntington Beach hidependent has been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation in Huntington Beach and Orange County by Decree of the Superior
Court of Orange County,State of California,under date of Aug. 24, 1994,case
A50479.
PROOF OF
PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am the Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to or interested in the below entitled matter.
am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON - - --- - - ---
BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGW REGARDNNG i
general circulation, printed and published in THE FIVEYEARIMPLEMENTATIONPiIUd AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT
the City of Huntington Beach, County Of AB1290 IMPLEMENTATION PLANFORTHE,
Orange, State of California, and the HUNNTON BEACH RE IROPMENTPROJECT
IS HEREBYGOVERN':l �J
attached Notice is a true and complete copy MENTiCE CODE SECTIONGIVEN 60631ANDC HEALTHCA DITSAFETY CR DIE SECTION
33490(a)THAT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD '
as was printed and published on the. OF DIRECTORS will hold'a public hearing on December 21, 2009 at 6:00 .j
following date(S): p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may,be heard, in the Civic
Center Council Chambers, located at 2000 Main-Street, Huntington Beach, i
for the purpose of.considering the adoption of the five year (2009-2014)
implementation plan,and affordable housing component for the Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Project.'
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach ("Agency")
is in the process of formulating a new Five-Year Implementation Plan
("Plan") and Affordable Housing Component.AB 1290 Implementation Plan
i for.its Huntington Beach;Redevelopment Project. As required by Section
33490 of the'California Community Redevelopment Law,("Law"), the
November 26 2009 proposed Plan will set forth the'Agency's goals, objectives,and anticipated
programs, projects -and expenditures for the ensuing five-year.. period
December 3, 10 2009 (2009-2014). The Plan will explain how these components will eliminate
blight and.increase and improve the supply of affordable housing; and'it
iwill also address the Agency's status in meeting low and moderate income
housing requirements. This public heating will also address the Agency's
consideration to aggregate new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling units
among all of the Project Areas as permitted by Section 33413(b)(2)-of I
the Law.The Law provides that redevelopment agencies,after consideration
at a public hearing, may,aggregate such units if they find,,based upon
substantial'evidence, that the aggregation will not cause or exacerbate
racial;ethnic,or economic segregation.
Residents or other interested'parties may,attend these public hearings
to offer comments on.the Five-Year Implementation Plan and Affordable
declare, under penalty of perjury, that the Housing Component 1290 Implementation plan. If you wish obtain
further information abobo ut the proposed"Implementation Plan and Affordable
ordable .
foregoing IS true and Correct. Housing Component;please contact Ms. Doris Powell; Huntington Beach
Economic Development Agency,at(714)536-5457.
JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON"BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET-2ND FLOOR
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648
(714) ii
Executed on December 15, 2009 ;
Published Huntington Beach Independent November 26 December 3 10, '
2009 ,"a x 1. 2a
at Costa Mesa, California
Signat
Huntington Beach Independent has been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation in Huntington Beach and Orange County by Decree of the Superior
Court of Orange County,State of California,under date of Aug. 24, 1994,case
A50479.
PROOF OF
PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am the Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party
to or interested in the below entitled matter.
I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON
BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of -,-. - - - - --- - -,
general circulation, printed and published in I NOTKEOF PUBW HIRINGBYTNE NUNflNGT
'MY OF
the City of Huntington Beach, County of REDEVELOPMIENTAGENQfREG1►RDING
Orange, State of California, and theF{yE`rEAR1MPLEFAENTATIONPtANANDAFFORDABLEHOUSINGtOMPONENT
attached Notice is a true and complete copy AB1290UNPt MITATIONPWA OR THE
as was printed and published on theET
HEREBY
GIVEN IN
ACCORDCH ANCE
WTPR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH FETY'CALIFORNIA GOVERN-
following dates}; 3349 CODE SECTION TIN AND HEALTH AND SAFETY'CODE SECTION I
33490(a)THAT THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
OF DIRECTORS will hold a public hearing on December 2.1, 2009 at 6:00
p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard; in the,Civic -j
Center Council Chambers, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
for the purpose of considering the adoption of the five year (2009-2014) .i
implementation plan.and affordable housing component for the Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Project.
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach ("Agency")
Iis in the process of formulating a new Five-Year Implementation,Plan
November 26 2009 ("Plan") and Affordable Housing Component A6 1290 Implementation Plan
for its Huntington Beach Redevelopment Project. As required by Section
December 3, 10, 2009 33490 of,the California 'Community Redevelopment Law ("Law"),• the
proposed Plan will set forth the Agency's goals,objectives, and anticipated
programs, projects—and expenditures for the ensuing five-year period
(2009-2014). The Plan will explain how these components will eliminate .
blight and increase and improve the supply of affordable housing;,and it
will also address the Agency's status in meeting low and moderate income
housing requirements. This.public hearing will also.address the Agency's '
consideration to aggregate new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling units
among all of the Project Areas as permitted`by Section 33413(b)(2) of
the Law.The Law provides.Niat redevelopment agencies,after consideration
at a public hearing, may-aggregate such units if they find, based upon
substantial evidence;-that-the aggregation will not cause or.exacerbate
1 declare, under penalty of perjury, rSResi ethnidents r otheconomic inerested game
Residents or other interested parties may attend these public hearings ,
p Y p j ry, that the to offer comments'on the Five-Year Implementation.Plan and Affordable
foregoing Is true and correct. Housing Component AB 1290 Implementation Plan. If you wish to obtain '
further information about the proposed Implementation Plan and Affordable
Housing Component; please contact Ms. Doris Powell, Huntington Beach 1
Economic Development Agency,at(714)536.5457.
JOAN L:FLYNN,CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Executed on December 15, 2009 2000MAINSTREET-LIF FLOOR
at Costa Mesa, California HUNTINGTON714)5, -5227 CALIFORNIA
(714)536-5227 '
Published Huntington Beach Independent November 26, December 3,10,
�1 2009 114-126
Signa