HomeMy WebLinkAboutCONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PIERSIDE RESTAURANT 2-20-9 :•:- ' 'r.' REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
A"ROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ��2 PH 90-11 P, �v
19 February 20, 1990
Date
CITY CLERK 0 / -0.13S '
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agen A :D BY CITY COUNCIL
.0
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Executive Director
19�-
Prepared by: Keith B. Bohr, Redevelopment Specialist !
My c K f
Subject: APPROVAL OF OOTCEPIUAL EEVF'LOPMENT PiAN
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments
STATEMENT OF ISSUE-
On January 17, 1989, the Agency directed staff to prepare an amended Pierside
Village plan to eliminate the specialty/retail uses while retaining the.
restaurant uses (staff report attached) . Additionally, staff was authorized
to negotiate with its operators for the rehabilitation of Maxwell's Restaurant.
CST•
Approve the conceptual plan for development of the "Pierside Restaurants"
which includes:
The development of two new restaurant pads - (25,000 sq.ft.) ;
. Accommodations for the relocation of. the existing Maxwell's
Restaurant - (15,000 sq.ft.) ;
. The development of a parking structure, including surface and
subsurface parking for both beachgoers and restaurant patrons;
. The development of beach-related concessions, including
approximately 6,000 sq.ft. of casual dining space; and
Authorize staff and the developer of Pierside to negotiate for the
relocation and integration of Maxwell's into the Pierside plan.
S4*' -f t C-� Cl- n--�
AMUSIS
On September 18, 1988, the City Council adopted a a "Pier Plaza" concept that
calls for the development of a 2.1 acre "Pier Plaza" to be located between the
base of the Pier and Pacific Coast Highway. Approximately one-half of
Maxwell's Restaurant as it exists today lies within the adopted 2.1 acre
footprint of this plan. As a result, the negotiations for the rehabilitation
P 1 O/1/85
of Maxwell's has shifted to negotiations for the demolition and relocation of
a new Maxwell's within the proposed Pierside Restaurant development.
The history of the Pierside project dates back to 1984 and is more
specifically outlined in the analysis of the attached staff report dated
January 17, 1989. Briefly, the originally approved "Pierside Village" plan
called for an 87,500 sq.ft. specialty/retail ccuplex to be located on the
ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway between the existing Maxwell's Restaurant
and the Lifeguard Headquarters. Ultimately, the plan received all necessary
approvals, including the California Coastal Ccumission.
However, as the Main-Pier Redevelopment Plan further evolved and approved
development heights and densities were scaled down, staff re-analyzed the need
for a specialty/retail complex of the scope and magnitude originally
envisioned for Pierside Village. As planning efforts continued, potential
conflicts between the Pierside Village concept and the retail activity along
Main Street began to be a source of concern.
Ultimately, it was concluded that the Pierside Village concept should be
downscaled and directed away fran a focus on retail activity and more towards
food services. The currently proposed plans are the result of that shift in
focus and reflect a refinement of that concept.
FUNDING SOURCE:
None as a result of this action.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS'
1) Deny approval of the Pierside Restaurants conceptual development plan, and
direct staff accordingly.
ATTACUMENIS
1) Staff report of January 17, 1989.
2) Conceptual Plan.
PEC/KBB:lp
0139h
-APPtZ BY CITY CUU UEST FOR CITY COUNCIL/
f .._ 17 REDS ELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
RH 89-U9
i9_1.
_..... � Date January 17, 1989
r ITV, LE
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor/Chairman and City Council/Agency Members
or
Submitted b : Paul E. Cook, City Administrator/Executive Direct o
�
y
Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Devel me
Michael C. Adams, Acting Director of.Community Developmen
Subject: PIERSIDE VILLAGE STATUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Consistent with Council Policy? ( ] Yes j>Q New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Pursuant to your direction, staff has.placed on the agenda for discussion purposes and
direction a Status Report on the Pierside Village portion of the Main-Pier Phase I
Project. In 1984, the Agency began its first implementation efforts in the Main-Pier
Project Area, and as a part of those efforts an initial development entity was selected for
the project that has become known as Main-Pier Phase I. The site was bounded by Lake
Street, Walnut, Main Street, a portion of the Pier, and the.Pacific Coast .Highway
frontage from the Lifeguard Headquarters to the Pier, bounded by the beach frontage
road on the ocean side.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1) Direct staff to prepare an amended Pierside Village plan utilizing the "cluster of
restaurants" concept, eliminating all other.specialty retail uses; and
2) Receive and file.this report.
ANALYSIS:
The initial development entity selected to work exclusively with the Agency, Huntington
Pacifica Development Group, included four principals. Negotiations took place from
late-1984 through mid-1985. The negotiations concluded in August of 1985, with the
adoption by the Redevelopment Agency of the Main-Pier Phase I DDA. This Disposition
and.Development Agreement provided for an initial scope of development that included in
part a 300-room, first-class hotel and related retail uses, and a 75,000 sq.ft. specialty
commercial complex. With the Disposition and Development Agreement being approved,
the developer spent an extensive period of time seeking to obtain financing and develop a
final Land Use Plan for implementation. In October of 1986, these efforts resulted in a
revised development concept that was approved along with the First Amended Disposition
and Development Agreement, and the initial Pierside Lease in October, 1986. Final
entitlement project approvals were obtained in December, 1986, through the Coastal
Commission and efforts continued to develop a viable Phase I plan for implementation.
Din Alan
Through 1987,.the planning efforts continued and a change of direction began_o ern
with respect to our Main Street redevelopment efforts. The 3DI Plan previously. apt-in concept began to evolve into which has become the "Village Concept." Thi= khan
direction was finalized with conceptual approval by the Agency of the entertEln-iment=
complex in lieu of the hotel in March of-1988, and Agency approval of the "Vick=ge
Concept" in April of 1988.
It is important to note that in the first several years of our implementation e :urts a
visitor.-serving corridor essentially from Main to Beach, Walnut to Pacific Coast Him
was envisioned. Under the visitor-serving concept Pierside Village was a key evelo=
component and served to provide a needed specialty/retail use as an importan �leme-
the visitor-serving concept. With a shift in direction and removal of that visi-w-c-ser--
core, we began to re-think the need for a specialty/retail village of the scope 2-id
magnitude originally envisioned for Pierside Village. .As the Village planning e_-orts:
continued, land use conflicts began to occur in terms of Pierside Village drawi. the.-_—
life for Main Street to that area rather than becoming the specialty/retail as mice
envisioned. Throughout this period of time, the economics of this project w.er= being
continually evaluated by Agency staff, our consultants, and developer represe_ative
Ultimately, a point was reached where the viability not only from a land use an
economic standpoint brought us to the conclusion that the Pierside Village con_ept sh==
be modified to achieve a more desirable land use, as well as an economically X.- ble
project. Thus, the decision to proceed with a cluster of restaurants rather tha_ to
attempt a specialty/retail center that would be in direct competition with the 7 vital-.—
Main Street retail core that we were attempting to create.
Staff has reviewed this matter with various Agency consultants and our recornmenda- _
is as outlined above to proceed with the preparation.of an Amended Pierside + age E� -_
In our analysis, this action is appropriate based upon project economics and the appro
modified development concept as now being implemented for the Main Street Care.
FUNDING SOURCE:
_ Available Agency Contractual Services funds.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Continue with original Pierside Village concept.
PEC/DLB:lp
4230r
STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Council Chamber, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Tuesday, January 17, 1989
Mayor Bannister called the regular City Council meeting of the City of
Huntington Beach to order at 7 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: MacAllister, Green, Winchell , Bannister, Mays, Silva, Erskine
Absent: None
(City Council/Redevelopment Agency) PIERSIDE VILLAGE STATUS REPORT - RECEIVED
AND FILED - STAFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE AN AMENDED PIERSIDE VILLAGE PLAN TO
ELIMINATE SPECIALTY RETAIL USES OTHER THAN RESTAURANTS - STAFF TO NEGOTIATE
WITH MAXWELL'S RESTAURANT RE REHABILITATION
The City Clerk/Clerk presented a communication from the Deputy City Adminis-
trator/Economic Development, transmitting pursuant to Council /Agency direction
a Status Report on the Pierside Village portion of the Main-Pier Phase I
Project. The site is bounded by Lake/Walnut/Main/a portion of the Pier and
the Pacific Coast Highway frontage from the Lifeguard Headquarters to the
Pier, bounded by the beach frontage road on the ocean side.
The City Administrator/Executive Officer presented a staff report.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Mays, to direct staff to prepare
an amended Pierside Village plan which eliminates all specialty retail uses
other than restaurants, -to receive and file the Pierside Village Status Report
and to authorize City staff to discuss and negotiate with the owner of
Maxwell ' s for a rehabilitation of that restaurant. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Green, Winchell , Bannister, Mays, Silva, Erskine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Mays requested staff to talk to potential restaurant users of the
pads and get specific required square footage before developing a plan.
Page 2 - Statement of Action - 1/17/89
Mayor Bannister adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council and the
regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to
8:30 a.m. , Friday, January 20, 1989, to Ben Brown' s Restaurant, Laguna Beach.
ATTEST: Connie Brockway
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Wes Bannister
County of Orange ) Mayor
City of Huntington Beach)
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of
said City at their regular meeting held on the 17th day of January 1989.
WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this
the 7th day of February 1990.
Connie Brockway
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
Deputy
T a c IL :
��IInIII
1 i r L1
co
f
Hon . Chairman and Members of the
Redevelopment Agency
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington. Beach, CA 92648
Re : Pierside Restaurant Project Concept Approval
Hon . Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency,
In anticipation of our presentation. to you on Tuesday,
February 20, 1990, I felt it would be appropriate to discuss
the basic concept we will be proposing. As all of you know,
the Pierside project has had a long history. Starting as a
Greek oriented retail village of over 85, 00 sf, with a focus
on retail stores, it was followed by an even more intensive,
but West Coast oriented proposal by Enterprise Development
Co .
Although the Agency origin.a lv supported i:he Greek
Village plan, it ultimately concluded that the successor
Enterprise plan was too intense and voted to down scale the
project and shift the focus to restaurants . Our original
proposal was geared to this end, and had less than .10, 000 sf
of retail on the Plaza level . Upon viewing the plan,
however, the Agency/Council sub-committee concluded that all
retail should be removed from the Plaza level, and that only
restaurants should be found in this l.ccation .
The conceptual plan before you reflects that further
change in direction. Dramatically simpler than a.11 prior
plans, it is limited to three new buildings : the
reconstructed Maxwell' s, and t,, o r:ew b--iildi n_gs totalling25, 000 sf . Pursuant to the sub-committee' s reccmme :dat_ons,.
the boardwalk level contains a 6, 000 sf casua:'j_ din _nq
establishment, a reconstructed Dwight' s, and approximately
7 , 500 sf of beach related cor:cessicr:s %food services .
A combination of limited sur-[&ce parking, and two
subterranean levels will provide approximately 500 parking
spaces for project visitors and beach goers . It is our
intention to maintain the Lowest level of parking,
constituting approximately 225 spaces, free for self-parking
and beach goer use . The middlze parking level, which has a
self-parking design capacity of approxinlately 225 spaces,
will, through the use of tandem and 'va';_et :management probably
house well in excess of 300 cars . in ligt:t of the -fact that
restaurants' have their highest re,Yic:d ofactivity inthe
r
late afternoon and evening; we belie,:-e that this mix will
provide high use of .the parking lot t-:ruughout the day.
As the attached di_1g:r.ar�s i.1. usr_rare,. ttie current
proposal has tremendous edestx _aT: .es..�. a.r.o mi.ni::al view
obstruction . In the vi ewL shed t11.v. ifi the Uark.ened
areas, are views of the Ocean .'_ockec:. In all other areas,
and along the entire length of PC:i, a Lunge of Ocean view
opportunities is available .
Pedestrians access the . project at Mai:_ and Lake Streets,
and can walk across the entire cf the Ocean side of
the project for free and with a totally unobstructed view of
the Beach, - Ocean and Pier, thereby elf ectively extending tr.e
Pier Plaza 800 feet to the South no cost to the community .
Access to the Beach is by ., huge staircases that . double as
observation areas . Furthermore, elevator access for the
frail and handicapped will be provided .
It is our conviction that the instant proposal fully
integrates the objectives set. ..fc!rth in the. . Downtown Specific
Plan for District 10, a copy- a{. Wl_ch is attached for your
review. Your approval of this c-r vvp _ will allow us to
proceed with further refinement of t..e , pearl and submission to
the Planning Commission.
I look forward to receiving yoll 7 unanimous support .
Sincere]_v yours,
Jonathan_ P . Chodos
PIERSIDE RESTAURANT PR.OvECT DESCRIP IO:Ij
Pacific Coast Highway Level :
Three separate buildings, restaurants only:
Maxwells 15, 000 sf Reconstruction
Building No. 2 10, OGO sf} New Construction 25, 000 sf
Building No. 3 15, 000 sf} it
Boardwalk Level fronting on Beach Access Road:
Casual Dining 6, 000 sf
Dwight' s 2 , 500 sf
Food Services sf
Beach Related
Concessions 5, 00.0. sf
Parking spaces 500+
District Seven is a consolidated parcel under one ownership and is
- approximately 13 gross acres. District Seven should be master planned as a
primarily visitor-serving commercial project, which could be implemented
over a number of phases. Hotel, motel, restaurant and specialty commercial
would be appropriate uses. Development in this District is not intended to
compete with the Downtown commercial core, therefore, major incentives
for development would not be necessary. The commercial uses in this
District would be of a more seasonal variety with the District serving as a
connecting link between the Downtown area and District Nine. The Plan
anticipates__ visitor-serving commercial can be accommodated with a
20 room el.
(:District Ten incl es the area on the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway
most suited f commercial development. This District includes the pier
sting parking areas on either side, comprising approximately 15
=w gross acres. The visitor-serving commercial uses most appropriate for this
District are beach-related and complementary to activities which occur
around the pier, such as fishing, surfing and sun bathing. Additional parking
in structures would also be appropriate provided that they do not extend
above the level of Pacific Coast Highway and block views.. This provision
should still provide for the option of multi-level commercial activities in
this District. The pier is a prime location for restaurants, which can take
advantage of the panoramic views. Equally important as the new Ok
commercial activities which may be accommodated is to insure that the
major emphasis in this District is public open space. The pier and beach
area must remain accessible to the public for free recreational pursuits.
District Ten is part of the pier-head node as described previously. This
commercial/recreational activity node is of primary importance in the
revitalization effort of the City. Development within this District will
probably be initiated with City efforts. The extent and intensity of
clevelopment in District Three and further inland will directly determine the
amount of revitalization which can occur -to the pier and the beach-related
commercial uses which can be accommodated. In addition, the. present
amount of parking can be approximately doubled without obstructing views
or drastically changing the overall character of the District.
3.2.4 Residential (High Density)
i�.
The residential designation includes two Districts (District Two and Eight)
exclusively for residential uses.
District Two extends from Goldenwest Street to 6th Street between Pacific
Coast Highway to Walnut Avenue. District Two is subdivided into numerous
twenty-five foot wide lots with very ldiverse ownerships encompassing
approximately 44 gross acres. District Two is intended to develop as a
continuation of the type and variety of residential development which exists
in the adjacent Townlot area. The development regulations should be
similar and compatible with those in the Townlot area, with the exception
that larger projects (one full block or more)' should be provided with
additional incentives to encourage lot consolidation. Consolidation of the
numerous small lots which are spread throughout the District is one of the
objectives of the Plan. In order to accomplish this, the allowed density in
35
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
=--------------------------------------------------------------------
126 39 137 01/04/88 RELOCATION GUIDELINES & REPLACEMENT
HOUSING PLAN - MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA -
CONT TO 2/1/88
61 39 137 01/04/88 RELOCATION GUIDELINES & REPLACEMENT
HOOUSING PLAN - MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA -
CONT TO 2/1/88
49 39 137 01/04/88 CONSULT AGRMT BTWN AGENCY/B L EVANS -
APPRVD SUBJ APPROVAL CITY
ATTY-VALUATION OIL INT - MAIN-PIER
48 39 137 01/04/88 CONSULT AGRMT BTWN AGENCY/B L EVANS -
APPRVD SUBJ APPROVAL CITY ATTY -
VALUATION OIL INT - MAIN-PIER
126 39 137 01/04/88 CONSULT AGRMT BTWN AGENCY/B L, EVANS -
APPRVD SUBJ APPROVAL CITY ATTY -
VALUATION OIL INT - MAIN-PIER
72 39 137 01/04/88 CONSULT AGRMT BTWN AGENCY/B L EVANS -
APPRVD SUBJ APPRVAL CITY ATTY -
VALUATION OIL INT - MAIN-PIER
126 39 147 01/19/88 CLO SES AGENCY NEGO ROBERT MAYER CORP
DRIFTWOOD MH PK - HB INN - MAIN-PIER
AREA - WATERFRONT PROJ
90 39 147 01/19/88 CLO SES AGENCY NEGO ROBERT MAYER CORP
DRIFTWOOD MH PK - HB INN - MAIN-PIER
AREA - WATERFRNT PROD
126 39 1.47 01/19/88 AGENCY CLO SES - MAIN-PIER PHASE I -
HUNTINGTON PACIFICA I AND PIERSIDE
DEVELOPMENT - NEGO RE PROP
90 39 147 01/19/88 AGENCY CLO SES - MAIN-PIER PHASE I -
HUNTINGTON PACIFICA I AND PIERSIDE
DEVELOPMENT - NEGO RE PROP
126 39 166 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT -
DIRECTION GIVEN TO STAFF
126 39 • 166 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER POLICY ISSUES AND PROGRAM
OPTIONS
126 39 169 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER HOUSING PROGRAM REPORT
85 39 169 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER HOUSING PROGRAM REPORT
126 39 169 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER PROJECT OVERVIEW
126 39 170 01/25/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJECT
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
126 39 171 01/25/88 DWNTWN SPECIIC PLAN DISTRICTS 1 THRU
11 AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT
SUBAREAS
85 39 171 01/25/88 DWNTWN SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICTS 1 THRU
11 AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT
SUBVAREAS
126 39 173 01/25/88 SUMMARIZATION OF MAIN-PIER PROJECT
AREA
126 39 177 0-0/01/88 REAPPOINTMENT- MAIN-PIER COMMITTEE
-GALLEGOS , GOODRICH, GUZZARDO,
HAYWARD, KOTSCH , MCCLAIN, MULLIGAN
42 39 192 02/16/88 SM - CLO SES - PROP NEGO - MAIN-PIER
RDVLPMT - WATERFRONT PROJ - MAYER CORP
- DRIFTWOOD MH PK
112 39 192 02/16/88 SM - CLO SES - PROP NEGO - MAIN-PIER
RDVLPMT - WATERFRONT PROJ - MAYER CORP
- DRIFTWOOD MH PK
90 39 192 02/16/88 SM - CLO SES - PROP NEGO - MAIN-PIER
RDVLPMT - WATERFRONT PROJ - MAYER CORP
- DRIFTWOOD MH PK
61 39 192 02/16/88 SM - CLO SES - PROP NEGO - MAIN-PIER
RDVLPMT - WATERFRONT PROJ - MAYER CORP
DRIFTWOOD MH PK
90 39 198 02/16/88 AUTHORIZATION FOR APPRAISALS &
ACQUISITION OF PARCELS IN THIRD BLOCK
MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA
126 39 198 02/16/88 AUTHORIZATION FOR APPRAISALS &
ACQUISITION OF PARCELS IN THIRD BLOCK
- MAIN-PIER PROD AREA
85 39 200 02/16/88 SEISMIC & FACADE IMPROVEMENT LOAN
PROGRAM MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA
124 39 •201 02/16/88 SEISMIC . & FACADE IMPROVEMENT LOAN
PROGRAM MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA
126 39- 201 02/16/88 SEISMIC & FACADE IMPROVEMENT LOAN
PROGRAM MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA
114 39 201 02/16/88 SEISMIC & FACADE IMPROVEMENT LOAN
PROGRAM MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA
i.26 183 02 22i88 AGENCY MIN BK - CLO SES - NEGO ROBERT
KOURY - MAIN-EMIR SUBAREA - PKING
V01, -PiN C;,E: F KEYWORDS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
81 AGENCY ;0 R'l)RF.,pT
2
01.1 1__:Y M A 1-.N I? I 1','R S('13 A! EA P K 1-NG
1216 4 2
THE' IAS A R F'A
Plf.EJ, P.
k" A l.' S IT 10 N I
PROJ AIN',L
126 40 12 0 3 21 88 MA 1.N-Pl P 1-1 AS F' f _)N 1
DEVELOPMEN"L' PLAN A T RN A ,"T\.E'S'
ALTERNATIVE B APPRVD AS
85 40 12 03/21/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE I - CONCEPTIL'Al,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALTERNATIVES
ALTERNATIVE B APPRVD AS AMEND
19 40 12 03/21/88 PUB COM MAIN-PIER PH I - CONCPT DEV
PLAN ALT SCHULZE - UNDERGROUND
PKING/GOLDEN BEAR/SURF MUSEUM
126 40 23 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5860 - ADPTD - ACQUIS
PROP BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 23 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5860 - ADPTD - AQUIS
PROP BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC
-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 24 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5861-ADPTD-ACQUIS PROP
. BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 24 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5861-ADPTD-ACQUIS PROP
BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC-
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 25 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5862-ADPTD-ACQUIS PROP
BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC-
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40- 26 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5863-ADPTD-ACQUIS PROP
BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING
STRUC-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 28 03/28/88 PUB HEAR - RES 5864-ADPTD-ACQUIS PROP
BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING
STRUC-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
90 40 28 03/28/88 PUB HEAR — RES 5864—ADPTD—ACCQUIS PROP
BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING
STRUC—MAIN—PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 31 03/28/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROJ AREA —
MAIN—PIER PHASE II
90 40 31 03/28/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
MAIN—PIER PHASE II
126 40 25 03/28/88 PUB HEAR — RES 5862 — ADPTD — ACQUIS
PROP BY EMINENT DOMAIN PKING STRUC —
MAIN—PIER REDEV PROD AREA
42 40 44 04/18/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PRO, AREA —
REAL PROP NEGO — HUNTINGTON PAC:IFICA
I/PIERSIDE DEVLPMT
126 40 44 04/18/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROJ AREA —
REAL PROP NEGO — HUNTINGTON PACIFICA
I/PIERSIDE DEVLPMT
42 40 44 04/.18/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROD AREA —
TOWNSQUARE — NEGO REAL PROP
126 40 44 04/18/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROJ AREA —
TOWNSQUARE — NEGO REAL PROP
90 !'! 44 04/18/88 CLO SES — MAIN—PIER REDEV PROD AREA —
TOWNSQUARE — NEGO REAL PROP
1.26 40 51 04; 1 t;/88 TRANSFER PUB IMPRVMNTS FUNDS FROM
OAKVIEInl < ''.: �.% PROJ AREA TO MAIN—P I?R
REDEV PROJ AREA—APt'„V(,
32 40 51 04/18/88 TRANSFER CDBG PUB IMPRVMtiI'S FUNDS FROM
OAKVIEW REDEV PRO,1 AREA TO MAIN—PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA—APPRVD
85 40 51. 04/18/88 TRANSFER CDBG PUB IMPRVMNTS FUNDS FROM
OAKVIEW REDEV PROD AREA TO MAIN—PIER
REDEV PRO,7 AREA—APPRVD
114 40 •• 51 04/18/88 TRANSFER CDBG PUB IMPRVMNTS FUNDS FROM
OAKVIEW REDEV PROD AREA TO MAIN—PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA—APPRVD
48 40 51 04/18/88 AUTH RETAIN CONSULTANT — MAIN—PIER
PROJ AREA IMPLEMENTATION PROG/ AGRMT
W/PMW ASSOC INC—APPRVD
126 40 51 04/18/88 AUTH RETAIN CONSULTANT — MAIN—PIER
PROJ AREA IMPLEMENTATION PROG/ AGRM'I'
W/PMW ASSOC INC—APPRVD
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
49 40 51 04/18/88 AUTH RETAIN CONSULTANT - MAIN-PIER
PROJ AREA IMPLEMENTATION PROG/ AGRMT
W/PMW ASSOC INC-APPRVD
90 40 51 04/18/88 AUTH ACQUISITION & APPRVD AGRMT OF
SALE TEBERG-5TH ST BTWN OLIVE/WALNUT -
MAIN_-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 51 04/18/88 AUTH ACQUISITION & APPRVD AGRMT SALE
FOR TEBERG-5TH ST BTWN OLIVE/WALNUT -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 52 04/18/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II STATUS REPORT-
EXTENDED TIME TO 7/1/88 FOR NEGO
AGRMT- GRIFFIN REALTY
96 40 52 04/18/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II STATUS REPORT-
EXTENDED TIME TO 7/1/88 FOR NEGO
AGRMT- GRIFFIN REALTY
49 40 52 04/18/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II STATUS REPORT-
EXTENDED TIME TO 7/1/88 FOR NEGO
AGRMT- GRIFFIN REALTY
121 40 52 04/18/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II STATUS REPORT-
EXTENDED TIME TO 7/1/88 FOR NEGO
AGRMT- GRIFFIN REALTY
85 40 52 04/18/88 MAIN-PIER PHASE II STATUS REPORT-
EXTENDED TIME " TO 7/1/88 FOR NEGO
AGRMT- GRIFFIN REALTY
90 40 52 04/18/88 AUTH ACQUISITION & APPRVD AGRMT OF
SALE-TAHMISIAN PROP-3RD ST AREA-
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
49 40 52 04/18/88 AUTH ACQUISITION & APPRVD AGRMT OF
SALE - TAHMISIAN PROP - 3RD ST AREA -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 52 04/18/88 AUTH ACQUISITION & APPRVD AGRMT OF
SALE - TAHMISIAN PROP - 3RD ST AREA -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 55 04/18/88 PUB HEAR CONT OPEN 5/2/88- RES
NECESSITY/ ACQUISITION PROP EMINENT
DOMAIN-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 55 04/18/88 PUB HEAR CONT OPEN 5/2/88-RES
NECESSITY/ ACQUISITION PROP EMINENT
DOMAIN-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 44 04/18/88 CLO SES - MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA -
REAL PROP NEGO - HUNTINGTON PACIFICA
I/PIERSIDE DEVLPMT
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
20 40 73 05/02/88 RES 150 - ADTPD - APPRVL OF RELOCATION
GUIDELINES MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA &
OTHER PROJ AREAS
126 40 73 05/02/88 RES 150 - ADPTD - APPRVL OF RELOCATION
GUIDELINES MAIN-PIER REDEV PROD AREA &
OTHER PROJ AREAS
87 40 73 05/02/88 RES 150 - ADPTD - APPRVL OF RELOCATION
GUIDELINES MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA &
OTHER PROJ AREAS
90 40 76 05/02/88 PUB HEAR-CONT OPEN
5/16/88-ACQUISITION/PROP-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA-RES/NECESSITY-EMINENT
DOMAIN
126 40 76 05/02/88 PUB HEAR-CONT
5/16/88-ACQUISITION/PROP-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA-RES/NECESSITY-EMINENT
DOMAIN
90 40 90 05/16/88 OPEN PUB HEAR-CONT 7/5/88-ACQUISITION
PROP - MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA-
RES/NECESSITY-EMINENT DOMAIN
126 40 90 05/16/88 OPEN PUB HEAR-CONT 7/5/88-ACQUISITION
PROP- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA-.RES/NECESSITY-EMINENT DOMAIN
42 40 96 05/23/88 CLO SES-DIRECT AGENCY NEGOT
RE:MAIN-PIER REDEV PROD/ROBERT MAYER
CORP-DRIFTWOOD MOBILEHOME PK-HB INN
90 40 96 05/23/88 CLO SES-DIRECT AGENCY NEGOT
RE :MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ/ROBERT MAYER
CORP-DRIFTWOOD MOBILEHOME PK-HB INN
126 40 96 05/23/88 CLO SES-DIRECT AGENCY HEGOT
REMAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ/ROBERT MAYER
CORP-DRIFTWOOD MOBILEHOME PK-HB INN
19 40 97 05/23/88 PUB COM-HAYWARD-MEMBER MAIN-PIER PROJ
AREA COM-THANKED PEOPLE FOR HELP ON
CLEAN-UP DAY DWNTN AREA
126 40 98 05/23/88 JT PUB HEAR-COUNCIL/REDEV AGENCY-OWNER
PARTICIPATE AGRMT-MOLA-MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ-OPEN CONT 6/6/88
49 40 98 05/23/88 JT PUB HEAR-COU-INC'I:L/REDEV AGENCY-OWNER
PARTICIPATE AGRMT-MOLA-MAI:N-PIER REDEV
PROJ-CONT OPEN 6/6/88
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
85 40 98 05/23/88 JT PUB HEAR-COUNCIL/REDEV AGENCY-OWNER
PARTICIPATE AGRMT-MOLA-MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ-CONT OPEN 6/6/88
126 40 ill 06/06/88 APPRVD REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
87 40 ill 06 06/88 APPRVD REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
49 40 115- 06/06/88 JT PUB HEAR-RES 5886-ADPTD-RES
153-ADPTD-OWNER PARTICIPATION
AGRMT-MOLA-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 115 06/06/88 JT PUB HEAR-RES 5886-ADPTD-RES
153-ADPTD-OWNER PARTICIPATI:ON
AGRMT-MOLA-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
61 40 134 06/20/88 APPRVD 50 , 000 APPROP
APPRAISALS-DRIFTWOOD/PACIFIC/OAKVIEW
MHPKS-WATERFRONT-PHASE I-MAIN-PIER
REDEV
49 40 134 06/20/88 APPRVD 50 , 000 APPROP
APPRAISALS-DRIFTWOOD/PACIFIC/OAKVIEW
MHPKS-WATERFRONT-PHASE I-MAIN-PIER
REDEV
126 40 134 06/20/88 APPRVD 50 , 000 APPROP
APPRAISALS-DRIFTWOOD/PACIFIC/OAKVIEW
MHPKS-WATERFRONT-PHASE I-MAIN-PIER
REDEV
85 40 134 06/20/88 APPRVD 50 , 000 APPROP
APPRAISALS-DRIFTWOOD/PACIFIC/OAKVIEW
MHPKS-WATERFRONT-PHASE I-MAIN-PIER
REDEV
126 40 143 06/27/88 JT PUB HEAR-RES 5895/154/ADPTD-2ND
AMEND DISPOSITION/DEVLPMT AGRMT
AGENCY/CA RESORTS-MAIN-PIER REDEV
126 40 ,146 06/27/88 CLO SES-TOWNSQUARE-MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ AREA-NEGO
ACQUISITION/PROP-NICCOLE AND SMITH
85 40 146 06/27/88 CLO SES - TOWNSQUARE - MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ AREA - NEGO ACUISITION OF PROP -
NICOLE AND SMITH
42 40 146 06/27/88 CLO SES - TOWNSQUARE - MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ AREA - NEGO ACQUISITION OF PROP -
NICCOLE AND SMITH
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
90 40 146 06/27/88 CLO SES - TOWNSQUARE - MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ AREA - NEGO ACQUISITION OF PROP -
NICCOLE AND SMITH
126 40 146 06/27/88 CLO SES-SECURITY NATIONAL
BANK-MAIN-PIER REDEV-NEGO
ACQUISITION/PROP-PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
REALTY CO
90 40 146 06/27/88 CLO SES-SECURITY NATIONAL
BANK-MAIN-PIER REDEV-NEGO
ACQUISITION/PROP PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
REALTY CO
126 40 152 07/05/88 MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA COM - REMOVAL
OF MEMBER - APPRVD - MULLIGAN -
REPLACEMENT TO BE SOLICITED
31 40 152 07/05/88 MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA COM - REMOVAL
OF MEMBER - APPRVD - MULLIGAN -
REPLACEMENT TO BE SOLICITED
90 40 157 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-ACQUISITION/PROP-CONT
9/6/88-GOSNEY PROP-MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ-RES/NECESS-EMINENT DOMAIN
126 40 157 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-ACQUISITION/ROP-CONT
9/6/88-GOSNEY PROP-MAIN-PIER REDEV
PROJ-RES/NECESS-EMINENT DOMAIN
90 40 157 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-CHILLCUT/SCHWARTZ-MAIN-PIER
REDEV-CLARK HOTEL-CONT 7/18/88
126 40 157 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-CHILLCUT/SCHWARTZ-MAIN-PIER
REDEV-CLARK HOTEL-CONT 7/18/88
90 40 158 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-RES 156
ADPTD-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-ZEIDAN-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
126 40 -- 158 07/05/88 PUB HEAR-RES
156-ADPTD-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-ZEIDAN-MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
126 40 172 07/18/88 APPRVD AUTHORIZE FILE ENTITLEMENT
APPLICATION W/OUT PROP OWNER CONSENT
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
85 40 172 07/18/88 APPRVD AUTHORIZE FILE ENTITLEMENT
APPLICATION W/OUT PROP OWNER CONSENT -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
49 40 173 07/18/88 APPRVD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR NEGO
AGRMT TO 7/1/89 - GRIFFIN REALTY -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
90 40 173 07/18/88 APPRVD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR NEGO
AGRMT TO 7/1/89 - GRIFFIN REALTY -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
126 40 173 07/18/88 APPRVD EXTENSION OF TIME FOR NEGO
AGRMT TO 7/1/89 - GRIFFFIN REALTY -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
90 40 177 07/18/88 PUB HEAR-CONT OPEN 8/1/88-EMINENT
DOMAIN-CLARK
HOTEL-CHILLCUT/SCHWARTZ-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 177 07/18/88 PUB HEAR-CONT OPEN 8/l/88-EMINENT
DOMAIN-CLARK
HOTEL-CHILLCUT/SCHWARTZ-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA
42 40 32 04/04/88 CLO SES - NEGO - ROBERT MAYER CORP -
DRIFTWOOD MH PK/HB INN - MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 32 04/04/88 CLO SES - NEGO - ROBERT MAYER CORP -
DRIFTWOOD MH PK/HB INN - MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA
90 40 32 04/04/88 CLO SES - NEGO - ROBERT MAYER CORP -
DRIFTWOOD MH PK/HB INN - MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ AREA
126 40 35 04/04/88 SUPPLEMENTAL APPTMTS - APPRVD -
MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA COM -
MADRIGAL/OPPERMAN
90 40 199 08/01/88 PUB HEAR-RES 155-CONT 8/15/88-ACQUIS
PROP EMINENT DOMAIN(.CLARK
HOTEL) -MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ/MAIN ST
85 40 . .199 08/01/88 PUB HEAR-RES 1_55-CONT 8/15/88-AQUIS
PROP EMINENT DOMAIN(CLARK
HOTEL) -MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ-MAIN ST
126 40 199 08/15/88 PUB HEAR-RES 155-CONT 8/15/88-ACQUIS
PROP EMINENT DOMAIN( CLARK
HOTEL) -MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ-MAIN ST
49 41 5 08/15/88 APPRVD AUTH FOR
ACQUISITION/PROP-CONTRACT/SALE-SHANDRI
CK-SW CORNER MAIN/OLIVE-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
-------------------------------------7-------------------------------
90 41 5 08/15/88 APPRVD AUTH FOR
ACQUISITION/PROP-CONTRACT/SALE-SHANDRI
CK-SW CORNER MAIN/OLIVE-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ
126 41 5 08/15/88 APPRVD AUTH FOR
ACQUISITION/PROP-CONTRACT/SALE-SHANDRI
CK-SW CORNER MAIN/OLIVE-MAIN-PIER
REDEV PROJ
90 41 6 08/15/88 AQUISITION PROP- APPRVD-
CONTRACT/SALE- CONLEY- 6TH ST BTWN PCH
& WALNUT- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
49 41 6 08/15/88 ACUISITION PROP- APPRVD-
CONTRACT/SALE- CONLEY- 6TH ST BTWN PCH
& WALNUT- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 41 6 08/15/88 ACQUISITION PROP- APPRVD-
CONTRACT/SALE- CONLEY- 6TH ST BTWN PCH
& WALNUT- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 41 9 08/15/88 PUB HEAR- AGENCY RES 155- ADPTD-
ACQUIS PROP EMINENT DOMAIN- CLARK
HOTEL- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
90 41 9 08/15/88 PUB HEAR- AGENCY RES 155- ADPTD-
ACQUIS PROP EMINENT DOMAIN- CLARK
HOTEL- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
49 41 49 09/19/88 AUTH FOR ACQUISITION AND CONTRACT OF
SALE - (WULLNER PROP ) - MAIN-PIER PROJ
AREA - APPRVD - 5TH/WALNUT
90 41 49 09/19/88 AUTH FOR ACQUISITION AND CONTRACT OF
SALE-(WULLNER PROP) - MAIN-PIER PROJ
AREA - APPRVD - 5TH/WALNUT
126 41 49 09/19/88 AUTH FOR ACQUISITION AND CONTRACT OF
SALE- (WULLNER PROP) - MAIN-PIER PROJ
AREA - APPRVD - 5TH/WALNUT
49 41 , . 50 09/19/88 AUTH/ACQUISITTON/APPRVL
CONTRACT/SALE-APPRVD (THARP PROP)
MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA-6TH ST BTWN
PCH/WALNUT
126 41 50 09/19/88 AUTH/ACQUISITION/APPRVL
CONTRACT/SALE-APPRVD (THARP PROP )
MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA-6TH ST BTWN
PCH/WALNUT
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
-----------------------------------------------------------------•----
90 41 50 09/19/88 AUTH/ACQUISITION/APPRVL
CONTRACT/SALE-APPRVD (THARP PROP)
MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA-6TH BTWN
PCH/WALNUT
49 41 56 09/19/88 RES 5927/159- ADPTD- COUNCIL/REDEV
PURCHASE AGR.MT APPRVD- WATERFRONT
PROJ- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
126 41 56 09/19/88 RES 5927/159- ADPTD- COUNCIL/REDEV
PURCHASE AGRMT APPRVD- WATERFRONT
PROJ- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
61 41 56 09/19/88 RES 5927/159- ADPTD- COUNCIL/REDEV
PURCHASE AGRMT APPRVD- WATERFRONT
PROJ- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
85 41 56 09/19/88 RES 5927/159- ADPTD- COUNCIL/REDEV
PURCHASE AGRMT APPRVD- WATERFRONT
PROJ- MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ AREA
.61 41 57 09/19/88 RES 5928/160 ADPTD-AGENCY REIMBURS
AGRMT PUB IMPROV
COSTS-APPRVD-MAIN-PIER REDEV (PACIFIC)
RL MAYER
49 41 57 09/19/88 RES 5928/160 ADPTD-AGENCY REIMBURS
AGRMT PUB IMPROV
COSTS-APPRVD-MAIN-PIER
REDEV(PACIFIC)RL MAYER
126 41 57 09/19/88 RES 5928/160 ADPTD-AGENCY REIMBURS
AGRMT PUB IMIPROV
COSTS-APPRVD-MAIN-PIER REDEV
(PACIFIC)RL MAYER
85 41 57 09/19/88 RES 5928/160 ADPTD-AGENCY REIMBURS
AGRMT PUB IMPROV
COSTS-APPRVD-MAIN-PIER REDEV (PACIFIC)
RL MAYER
106 41 93 10/24/88 ORD 1 - ADPTD - TAX ON OCCUPYING
LODGING WITHIN MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
70 41' 93 10/24/88 ORD 1 - ADPTD - TAX ON OCCUPYING
LODGING WITHIN MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
126 41 93 10/24/88 ORD 1 - ADPTD - TAX ON OCCUPYING
LODGING WITHIN MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
85 41 93 10/24/88 ORD 1 - ADPTD - TAX ON OCCUPYING
LODGING WITHIN MAIN-PIER REDEV PROJ
AREA
90 41 102 10/24/88 PUB HEAR-RES/NECESS-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH
1 OIL INTEREST-EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO/H&O OIL CO/CONT 11/7/88
126 41 102 10/24/88 PUB HEAR-RES/NECESS-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH
1 OIL INTEREST-EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO/H&O OIL CO-CONT 11/7/88
85 41 102 10/24/88 PUB HEAR-RES/NECESS-MAIN-PIER
PROJ-PHASE 1 OIL INTEREST-EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO/H&O OIL CO-CONT 11/7/88
31 41 107 11/07/88 APPTMT TO MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA COM -
APPRVD - VILLEROT
126 41 107 11/07/88 APPTMT TO MAIN-PIER PROJ AREA COM -
APPRVD - VILLEROT
69 41 110 11/07/88 APPRVD PROPOSED USE/FUND-BOND
PROCEED/HB PUB FINANCE AUTH-HUNT
CTR/MAIN-PIER/OAKVIEW/TALBERT-BEACH
54 41 110 11/07/88 APPRVD PROPOSED USE/FUND-BOND
PROCEED/HB PUB FINANCE AUTH-HUNT
CTR/MAIN-PIER/OAKVIEW/TAI,BERT-BEACH
126 41 110 11/07/88 APPRVD PROPSED USE/FUND-BOND
PROCEED/HB PUB FINANCE AUTH-HUNT
CTR/MAIN-PIER/OAKVIEW/TALBERT-BEACH
85 41 110 11/07/88 APPRVD PROP USE/FUND-BOND PROCEED/HB
PUB FINANCE AUTH-HUNT
CTR/MAIN-PIER/OAKVIEW/TALBERT-BEACH
90 41 120 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES 161-CONT
11/21/88-ACQUIS/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-H&O OIL CO-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1
OIL INTEREST
85 41 '. 120 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES 161-CONT
11/21/88-AQUIS/PROP/EMINENT DOMAIN/H&O
OIL CO-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1 OIL
INTERESTS
72 41 120 ' 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES 161-CONT
11/21/88-ACQUIS/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN/H&O OIL CO-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1
OIL INTEREST
MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
126 41 120 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES 161-CONT
11/21/88-ACQUIS/PROP/EMININENT
DOMAIN/H&O OIL-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1 OIL
INTERESTS
126 41 121 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES
162-ADPTD-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO OIL-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PHI
OIL INTERESTS
90 41 121 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES
162-ADPTD-ACQUISITION/PROP/EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO OIL-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PHI
OIL INTERESTS
72 41 121 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES
162-ADPTD-ACQUIS/PROPERTY/EMINENT
DOMAIN-CAPRO OIL-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1
OIL INTERESTS
85 41 121 11/07/88 PUB HEAR-RES
162-ADPTD-ACQUIS/PROPERTY/EMINENT
DOMAIN/CAPRO OIL-MAIN-PIER PROJ-PH1
OIL INTERESTS
19 41 136 11/21/88 PUB COM- PICARD- RE PROPOSED PURCH
MAIN-PIER PH I OIL INTERESTS- CONCERN
ESTABLISH FAIR MARKET VALUE
49 41 138 11/21/88 AGRMT FOR SALE OF REAL PROP - APPRVD -
MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJ AREA - STUART
OMOHUNDRO - 121 5TH ST
90 41 138 11/21/88 AGRMT FOR SALE OF REAL PROP - APPRVD -
MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJ AREA - STUART
OMOHUNDRO - 121 5TH ST
126 41 138 11/21/88 AGRMT FOR SALE REAL PROP - APPRVD -
MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJ AREA - STUART
OMOHUNDRO - 121 5TH ST
85 41 138 11/21/88 AGRMT FOR SALE OF REAL PROP - APPRVD -
MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJ AREA - STUART
OMOHUNDRO - 121 5TH ST
49 41' 140 11/21/88 HASEKO/CALIF RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL-MAIN-PIER PH I
ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX DEVLPMT-DELETED
FROM AGENDA
126 41 140 11/21/88 HASEKO/CALIF RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL-MAIN-PIER PH I
ENTERTAINMENT COMLEX DEVLPMT-DELETED
FROM AGENDA
' MINUTES INDEX
SUBJECT VOL PAGE DATE KEYWORDS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
85 41 140 11/21/88 HASEKO/CALIF RESORTS
INTERNATIONAL-MAIN-PIER PH 1
ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX DEVLPMT-DELETED
FROM AGENDA
The foregoing instrument is a correct
copy of the original on file in this office.
Attest -2 C-; i9.fit
CONNIE BRQCKyyAt
City Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the Cfty of Huntington Beach,
Cat.
Deputy
� NI
` `UI
T^K s
I I � 03
i
�OPi hYA
I I
i
i
i
6EACH ACCESS Lr-VEL
i
I 7 2M
/7 T .f D L L CR.CARNF.Y
C
I
G [.�s��nG c t.i silo[nun. _n Lei Col cos'I1� Cs �— [.i s:•nG 5u�i ui�Gs !.
m 2
ci F i,}—III �--L�
_7=Xi
Pacific Coast Highway
....................--_._ ��..
O
WOW /awt+
�—
a . .......
fore go ing i.rtstrument is a correcc
t
........................................_.................................... .......... .............. .... .............. ......,............. ....... copy of the original on file in thisoffice.
II Attest �2-- a---L ig 9 v
j CONN. IJE BROCKWAY
City Clerk and Ex-off icio Clerk of the City
Council of the Clty of Huntington Beach,
Cal.
By � Deputy
Site Plan0
U
ll 11" •IU R S I !Ll L !L LL1 LG 'L.d" E CRmCARNEY
E—;:.G P.......P—Ili En QET co
_:s.rnG.ran.�nG•.on P:e::al nnv I I Eai slinG BYIIEI^Ce
o
mi
Pacific Coast Highway
------- --� �� -- --
C I
I
tleac:: access FoaE ����•� �•��
.................. .. ..... .. .......... ...... .
.................. ...TI* Jo.regaing instrument is a correct
copy of the original on file in this office.
Attest a (1 19
— CONNIE BROCKWAY
City C le rk and Ex-officio Clerk of the City
j Council of the Clfy of Huntington Beach,
Ca I.
Bye —EJ Deputy
• ,E
Site Plan
11 . E Illl S .1 .L.l• 1_e I !Le LLa 4 `l.l" 1L" CR CARNEY
0
0
.................
a,
0
'D
7Z
-------------------
jI.
saix
IVIZ A F,
Existing Max fell's
. ....... ........ ...... Existing D w I g h t S.
View Corridors
Site Plan
foregoing instrument is a correct
y of the original on file in this office. P I E R S I D E I L L 4 G E CFLCARNEY
...........
ist
rnninnF Ppnr%VIAI A V
d
.........................
. ..... ....
..........
... .........
.................
ar ................ . ........
S
.............
... .........
Pacih-, Coac- Hignway
.... .......
.............
...................
........ ...
........ .....
............................
. ............
... .......... ........
..........
..........
..........
...........
7777"77777777771
... .......... ...
....... . ........
-----------
-W/I--
;PF
X-A
v
AGYr; Ant
Pedestrian Access
Site Plan
.4e, foregoing instrument is a correct E IL
I L L 4 C E CCARNfY
C, PI RSID LH:
apy of the original on file in this office.
�ttpst
4 • �
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH tg�Z) : . /tI4/
To City Council From Charles W. Thompson
City Administrator
Subject DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL Date January 25, 1985
DESIGN GUIDELINES AND
SLIDE PRESENTATION
Please find attached for your review and comment a very preliminary
draft of the Downtown Architectural Design Guidelines. Inside the
booklet you will find a few samples of the illustrations which are
currently being prepared by an artist . Asterisks mark the places
where drawings will appear in the final draft.
A fifteen minute.-slide presentation is also being developed which
illustrates and introduces the Guideline booklet. Eventually it will
be a ' canned' , two screen show that will be available for
presentations to developers and civic groups showing what we envision
for the downtown area.
A preliminary version of this slide presentation will be given at the
Study Session on Monday evening, January 28, 1985 to show the
direction in which we are heading.
Both the booklet and the presentation cover only private improvements
to be made in the downtown area. Upon completion we will begin
preparing a second phase covering public improvements .
Any comments you wish to submit on both the booklet and presentation
would be appreciated.
CWT:PP: jr
Attachments
Cone-►�� 4.
T..4.4 •1
CO)n
DRAFT - JANUARY 24, 1935
DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
_ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
r . rPURPOSE
The purpose of . this booklet is to present This booklet is intended to
n and siting give the
architectural design 9 designer a clear idea of the
guidelines which apply to all development architectural elements which should be
within the boundaries of the Huntington incorporated into the proposed design.
Beach Downtown Specific Plan. It will also serve as a tool for review
of development proposals within the
The Downtown Architectural Design Specific Plan area. All projects must
guidelines are intended to promote high also conform to the Development Standards
standards in architectural design and the contained in the Downtown Specific Plan
construction of aesthetically pleasing and other applicable Sections of the
buildings which reflect the contemporary Huntington Beach Ordinance .
Mediterranean design theme of the area.
The guidelines strive to incorporate into
the downtown area a strong, recognizable
physical image and identity.
; I
!j it���Kf^=� ••" - ti�l41"�f' - .r _'• r; �� _ 'Z- - � .
.yy
�_ T _
- .:1
E
!
'ONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 4.0 SIGNS
2.0 ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA 4.1 General Design Guidelines
4.2 Awning Signs
2.1 General Design and Siting .4.3 Banners
Guidelines 4.4 Canopy Signs
Building Form and Mass 4.5 Freestanding Signs
The Pedestrian 4.6 Wall Signs
Experience 4. 7 Window Signs
Views
Environment
2.2 Building Materials
2. 3 Building Colors
2.4 Roofs
2. 5 Windows
2.6 Doorways and Entrances
2. 7 Stairways
2.8 Balconies
2.9 Arches and Arcades
2.10 Low Walls and Fences
2.11 Building Details
2.12 Focal Elements
Gateways
Towers
Fountains
3.0 LANDSCAPING
3.1 Design Principals
3.2 Landscape Standards
3 .3 Materials
INTRODUCTION
9N.TRODUCTION
The City of Huntington Beach has evolved The adopted theme is an expression of the
with the ocean as the core and center of coastal influence and image of Huntington
its vitality. The Downtown Specific Plan Beach. The design theme will be carried
takes advantage of the ocean as a out not only in building design, but
resource and beach-related amenities and through signage, landscape, lighting and
draws from the rich history of the area streetscape design.
as the early focal point of the city's
civic, recreational, and business
activities .
The adopted design theme for the downtown
area is contemporary Mediterranean
architecture, a style responsive to the
. climate and location of the city. The
contemporary Mediterranean style is
comprised of many influences--images from
the coastal portions of Spain , Italy,
Portugal and Greece, mixed with elements
of contemporary Mexican and Southern
Californian architecture. Arches, deeply
recessed windows, courtyards, tile roofs,
balconies and stucco walls are common
elements. The climate and ocean
proximity dictate orientation to the
prevailing breezes, protection from the
sun and wind and views of the ocean.
Light-colored building materials reflect
the sunlight and become a background to
the brighter accent colors of the
building trim and other architectural
details.
The aesign concept of the Downtown
Specific Plan focuses on the municipal
LAKE STRIEErBLOCKS pier and seeks to craw the pedestrian up
TRAWHON
ti : .. .L. Main Street to the Town Square, a retail
anchor at the head of Main Street which
will include office, residential and a
TOWN SOUAREI major plaza. The level of energy and
BLOqC ,.::.. excitement generated at the pier-head
:;::• �,
should be capitalized upon and spread
throughout the Downtown core .
�:�� : Development should be scaled to a
v pedestrian level with passive activities
:...
e such as strolling and viewing given equal
�,.b.•, ,,,t...•_ •,.....,,, �. . consideration with more vigorous —
�r~ activities such as surfing, swimming and -
TRANS"ION ; bicycling. The overall form and shape of
c.
BLOCKS ..
►; ', .+ _ 4 ��. all development in the downtown area
•c ;. ,: : ,�J x : MXED MANST� should provide view, light and air
� sIt AREA corridors to the ocean wherever
possible. The pier will continue to
S ,
• _, i sl: serve as the main attraction in the city
RESIDE USES JJ` �. and should become .the catalyst for the
USES � 4i � r +� - � --
I j • ; V revitalization effort .
.f, NO- �
.f+
•• ( �•
t_�,`°'° ,,
IF 01
RESCENTIAL � ,'. PER HEAD
MIXED USE
BOARDWALK Bomb DEVELOPMENT
HeetavmnY � K• .
r3ENERAL DESIGN AND SITING GUIDELINES
BUILDING FORM AND MASS THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE
The relationship of buildings to New development within the downtown
pedestrian spaces is the key to a lively should be oriented towards pedestrians .
and exciting outdoor environment in down The way that buildings are sited creates
town Huntington Beach. Because the pedestrian spaces. The uses that they
overall scale of the downtown is to be of house contribute to a varied and lively
a "human scale", care must be taken to streetscape.
keep the buildings from becoming too
massive and thus imposing. o Buildings facing pedestrian streets
and plazas should incorporate
o Tall buildings should be made less design features that provide visual
imposing by physically stepping interest at the street level . In
them back from the street level . adaition, the buildings are
required to provide street level
o building facades should be detailed uses such as shops, restaurants and
in such a way to make them appear services that cater to pedestrians.
shorter. This can be done with the
use. of horizontal bands or by o Where appropriate in commercial and
increasing the level of detail on mixed-use areas, buildings should
the buildings at the street level. accommodate several levels of
pedestrian activity.
o New buildings should be designed in
such a way to create pleasing o Building setbacks along major
transitions to surrounding pedestrian streets should be varied
development. whenever possible to create small
courtyards or plaza-like areas
which attract pedestrians.
VIEWS ENVIRONMENT
Ocean views provide an added benefit to In site and building design,
an area. The downtown area offers many environmental factors such as wind, sun,
spectacular views with the opportunity noise, shadow and reflection on buildings
for additional views to be revealed. and on .outdoor spaces must be addressed.
o Buildings should be designed and o both building design and the design
sited to provide ocean views of open space areas along the first
block inland from Pacific Coast
o New structures should be designed Highway should take into account
to respect the views of existing the strong prevailing westerly
buildings. winds.
o Rooftops should be designed to be o The effect of shadowing that a new
visually attractive when viewed building will have upon adjacent
from. adjacent buildings. development should be considered.
o Additional sunlight should be .
brought into large developments
through the use of courtyards,
atriums and skylights .
o The effects of shadowing in open
areas such as courtyards should be
studied and buildings should be
designed to provide adequate
sunlight for pedestrian use.
rr r
t r r
ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA
-BUILDING MATERIALS. BUILDING COLOR
BUILDING COLORS
Buildings should demonstrate uniformity
in materials and consistency in style Colors can greatly affect the imagery and
through all exterior elevations . mood of the downtown area. Use of a
harmonious color scheme with bright
Buildings should have one primary accents will produce a lively atmosphere
material . The dominant exterior encouraging year-round use.
material of a building should be one of BACKGROUND COLOR
the following :
Base walls of buildings and other large
o Stucco ( smooth ana rough) expanses should be lightly-colored. Soft
o Smooth Block o Granite tones ranging from whiteto pastel tints
o Marble are encouraged. Neutrals such as
off-whites, beige and sand are also
The use of reflective glass as a primary acceptable colors . Salmon and other
material is discouraged. muted colors give a pleasing contemporary
appearance.
ACCENT MATERIALS ACCENT COLOR
Secondary materials should be used to Some graphic elements should be brightly
highlight building features or provide colored to contrast with the
interest . light-colored background architecture in
order to produce a lively streetscape.
o Wood
o Glass Building details such as doors, chimneys,
o Tile window framing, trim, railings, awnings
o Brick light fixtures or planters may be used to
o Concrete carry the bright accent color . Care
o Painted Metal should be taken not to use too many
o Wrought Iron bright colors or too many different types
of details so as to avoid an overwhelming
building
ROOFS
Appropriate and simple forms include the
shed, gable, and hip roofs which may be Flat roofs should be avoided.
used in combination to achieve the
varying roofline characteristic .of
Mediterranean villages.
Shed Gable
Chimneys, roof flashing, rain gutters,
downspouts, vents and other roof
protrusions should be finished to
complement or accent the adjacent
materials and colors . This can be
accomplished by using materials similar
to those used on the building or by
Hip painting the detail in an accent color .
These details enhance the Mediterranean
appearance of a building.
Roof materials most indicative of Zhe design and screening of rooftop
Mediterranean architecture include clay mechanical equipment should be
incorporated into the building design.
shingle tile, concrete shingle tile,
Mission tile and other the-like Mechanical equipment should not be
visible from any angle or any height
designs . Other appropriate roof
outside of the building.
materials include copper and painted
metal .
,WINDOWS
Windows in the Mediterranean style are Accented with window boxes.
typically multi-paned. Surrounding
window treatments can create variations
of this style as seen in the following
examples.
Arched openings.
Tile highlights.
Small paned windows with shutters..
Iron or wood grill.
Brightly colored cloth or painted metal
awnings can enhance the visual appearance
Projecting bay windows. of a building . Awnings should be of a
solid color and be designed to coordinate
with the architectural divisions of the
building rather than being long and
continuous. .
"DOORWAYS AND ENTRANCES
Doors are a major focal element in the
Mediterranean style. Traditionally they
are ornate and highly detailed. Doors
are generally wooden and accented by an —�
arch or eave.
o Building entries should be
protected from the elements and Ij it . !I,
provide a "sense of shelter' ���I i
through the use of an overhang or a
simple recess.
illy!,.
o Building entries should afford a
"sense of entry" for the structure.
Door designs can range from the more
detailed traditional style to a
simplified contemporary variation. .
(T.
• Highlighted with brightly colored cloth
awnings.
I
The use of a wall or eave can contribute
to the importance of an entrance. - —
Stucco arch surrounding wood door .
.STAIRWAYS
Stairways, while functional often become
a major focal point in the design of a ,
building . They can create effects
ranging from majestic entry ways to
understated level changes As a- design
element , stairways create visual r
transitions from one level to another .
People are drawn to stairs as a place to -`- -,
sit and view the surrounding plazas, ' w`
people and buildings .
ter-
An ornate stairway can identify a major
i I entrance to a building .
FA
, i
I i
Risers can be highlighted with colorful
tile and rails.
ARCHES AND ARCADES.
Arches are the most clearly recognizable
feature of Mediterranean architecture.
They originally developed as the way to
provide structural support for a doorway.
o Care should be taken that arches
appear authentic. The integrity of
an arch is lost when its mass is
not proportional to its size. The
columns should relate in scale to
that which they visually support
When arches are repeated along the length
of a building , an arcade is created.
Arcades are especially appropriate in the
commercial and mixed use areas to protect
pedestrians from sun and inclement
weather . Arcades create cool shaded
spaces and pedestrian scaled walkways .
. They can also create a protected area for
the temporary outdoor expansion for
displays and outdoor dining.
•BALCONIES
Balconies create additional outdoor
living areas and serve to break up blank
walls on the upper levels of buildings .
Balconies allow people to take advantage
of the ocean breezes, views and mild
climate almost year-round.
A balcony. can be designed as a deep inset
on the building form, highlighted by the
use of tile or contemporary railings.
A balcony can also be designed as a
projection from a building.
Decorative iron grills can be used to
give the illusion of a balcony.
Roof tops can be used to provide usable
outdoor space in both residential and
commercial developments.
LOW WALLS AND FENCES
Low walls and fences are an appropriate �L Wrought iron can be used with .stucco or
architectural element for incorporating 7C- brick pilasters.
color , tile, and iron accents which are
characteristic of Mediterranean
architecture. They mark entrances and
define the space around buildings , ,. Simple walls can be accented with an iron
especially those setback from the entry gate.
street. They give a sense of privacy and
separation and screen public places from A planter can be incorporated into a wall
pedestrian traffic. They can also be
thus allowing the landscape materials to
transparent allowing the passerby to
enjoy the views without permitting soften the walls impact .
intrusion.
o Walls should be integrated with the Simple stucco walls can be highlighted
overall building design and not with the use of tile.
look like an afterthought.
o Where scenic views are available to
the community, walls of the type
that obstruct views should not be
constructed.
o The use of solid concrete block
walls, grape stake or chain link
fencing is strongly discouraged.
BUILDING DETAILS
An overhead awning or trellis can provide
Building and site details are also protection for a bank of mailboxes .
important in creating new developments
which are of high design quality.
Security gates or buildings can be
integrated into the Mediterranean theme.
o building and site details should be
integrated into the overall design
of the building or development.
o The elements which can be
unsightly, such as utility boxes
and air conditioning units, should
be screened from view.
o Accessory elements such as
mailboxes, trash enclosures, and
security gates should be designed
to be compatible with the
architectural style of the project.
Utility boxes can be screened from view,
yet remair. accessible to the utility
companies .
Trash containers can be screened from
view within an enclosure designed to be
compatible with the building. by using
similar materials and accents which appear
on the building, the enclosure can be made
to appear as an integral part of the
project .
.. FOCAL ELEMENTS
GATEWAYS
Gateways are a visual element which
create a sense of entry. Gateways can
range in scale. They may identify an
entrance to the downtown or on a smaller
scale, they may mark the entrance into a
development or a single building.
TOWERS, SPIRES AND DOMES
Towers, spires and domes are often viewed
from a distance. They become landmarks
and serve to provide orientation for
people within the downtown area. A clock
tower for example, can be used as a theme
for a particular development.
t��lr/111A%i��f� � a.u•p�
'+ - —1 '.q•/'III �,. '� i
may" ri -
i
LANDSCAPING
GENERAL LANDSCAPE PRINCIPLES
Emphasis should be placed on Californian biany areas within the downtown area have
and Mediterranean landscapes and been used in the past for oil operations
gardens . Californian and Mexican native or have been subject to adverse impacts .
plantings, courtyards, courtyard gardens, from the oil operations on nearby sites.
vines , flowering plants and the use of Therefore, soil testing for agricultural
fountains, arbors, trellises and suitability is required for each site.
container plantings are encouraged. Any laboratory recommendations which
result from such a test must be followed.
Expansive horizontal or vertical surfaces
comprised of a single material can be
broken up or interrupted through the use
of vines or foliage.
Vines can be used to dramatize a
building 's architecture or soften hard
materials . Vines can also be used to
enhance or screen fences and trash
enclosures.
• The landscaping within courtyards, both
public and private, should include a
balance of hard and softscape materials,
and provide shaded seating areas .
Boxed and tubbed plants in decorative
clay, wood, or stucco and tile planters
can be used for the enhancement of
sidewalk shops .
Large planters may. also be incorporated
into seating areas. Such planters should
be open to the earth below and be
provided with a permanent irrigation
system.
- LANDSCAPE MATERIALS
FIRST ZONE OF EXPOSURE
Dodonea viscosa Hopseed Bush
All property within the Downtown area
which lies between the high tide line and Griselina spp. None
Walnut Avenue lies within the "first zone
of exposure. " Landscape materials within Juniperus spp. Juniper
this area are subject to strong
prevailing winds and salt laden air . The Leptospermum Australian Tea Tree
appropriate landscape materials for this laevigatum
area are listed below:
Malaleuca spp. None
TREES
Metrosideros None
Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm villosus
Brahea edulis Guadalupe Palm . Myoporum laetum None
Butia capitata Pindo Palm Pittosporum Karo
crassifoloum
Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm
Pittosporum Dwarf Karo
Metrosideros New Zealand Christmas crassifolium nana
execelsus Tree
Pittosporum tobira Tobira
Pittosporum Karo (std. )
crassifolium Pittosporum tobira Wheeler 's Dwarf Tobira
Wheeleri
Pittosporum tobira Tobira (std . )
Raphiolepis spp. Indian Hawthorne
Washingtonia Mexican Fan Palm
robusta Rhamnus alaternus Italian Buckthorn
SHRUBS Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Bush
Carissa spp. Natal Plum PERENNIALS
Ceanothus spp. Wild Lilac Euryops pectinatus None
Coprosma spp. Mirror Plant Felician amelloids Blue Marguerite
Limonium perezii Sea Lavendar
Osteospermum Trailing African Daisy
fruticosum
GROUNDCOVERS
Arctostaphylos Bearberry Vinca rosea Madagascar Periwinkle
uva-ursi VINES
Arctotheca Cape Weed Muehlenbeckia Wire Vine
calenciula complexa
Baccharis Prostrate Coyote Bush Solandra maxima Cup-of-Gold Vine
pilularis
Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle
Carissa prostrata Prostrate Natal Plum
Carpobrotus edules Sea Fig GRASS AND LILY-LIKE PLANTS
Ceanothus Point Reyes Ceanothus
Agave spp. Century Plant
gloriosus y
Aloe vera None
Ceanothus griseus Carmel Creeper
horizontalis Cortaderia Pampas Grass
selloana
Delosperma alba White Trailing Ice
Plant Dracaena spp. None
Drosanthemum Festuca rubra Red Fescue
floribundum Rosea Ice 'Plant
Pandanus utilis Screw Pine
Gazania spp. None
Hedera canariensis Algerian Ivy Paspalum spp. None
Juniperus conferta Shore Juniper Pennisetum Kikuyu Grass
clandestinum
Lampranthus Purple Iceplant Phormium tens New Zealand Flax
productus
Lantana None
Yucca aloifolia Spanish Bayonet
montevidensis Korean Grass
Zoysia japonica
r
SECOND ZONE OF EXPOSURE
*Melaleuca quinquenervia None
The land located north of Walnut Avenue
is within the "second zone of exposure. " Pinus spp. Pine Tree
Wind and salt air again affect the
Pittosporum. spp. None
vegetation, however, not to the extent as
in the first zone. Appropriate landscape
materials include all species listed for Podocarpus spp. None
the first zone as well as the following: *prunus pissardi Flowering
TREES Plum
Agonis flexuosa Peppermint *Prunus spp. None
Tree
*Quercus spp. Oak Tree
*Arbutus unedo Strawberry Raphiolepis None
Tree "Magestic Beauty"
*Callistemon spp. Bottlebrush *Tristania conferta Brisbane Box
*Ca.lodendrum capense Cape Chestnut *Indicates street tree
*Cupaniopsis anacardiodes Carrotwood SHRUBS
Eriobotrya spp. Loquat Abelia grandiflora Glossy Abelia
Erythrina caffra Coral Tree
Baccharis spp. Coyote Bush
*Eucalyptus spp. Gum Trees
Callistemon spp. Bottlebrush
Ficus spp. Fig Trees Ceanothus spp. Wild Lilac
*Harpephyllum caffrum Kaffir Plum
Cotoneaster spp. None
*Hymenosporum flavum Wedding Tree
Choisya ternata Mexican
*Magnolia grandiflora Southern Orange
Magnolia
Cistus spp. Rock Rose
Eleagnum spp. None VINES
Escallonia spp. None Beaumontia grandiflora Easter Lily
Vine
Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple
Guave Bougainvillea None
Garrya elliptica Tassel Bush Ficus pumila Creeping Fig
Grevillea spp. None Gelsemium .sempervirens Carolina
Jessamin
Hibiscus spp. None
Hibbertia scandens Guinea Gold
Lantana spp. None Vine
Letospermum spp. Tea Trees Jasminum spp. None
Leucophyllum texanum Texas Ranger Lonicera spp. Honeysuckle
Ligustrum spp. Privets Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat 's Claw
Trumpet
Nerium oleander None Vine
Parthenocissus Boston Ivy
tricuspidata
PERENNIALS
Rhoicissus capensis Evergreen
Centranthus ruber Red Valarian Grape
Coreopsis spp. None Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine
Echium fatuosum Pride of GRASS AND LILY-LIKE PLANTS
Madeira
Agapanthus africanus Lily of the
Pelargonium domesticum Lady Nile
Washington
Geranium Beaucarnea recurvata Elephants
Foot
Veronica spp. Speedwell
Cordyline australis Cabbage Tree Phyla nodiflora Lippia Grass
Cynodon spp. Bermuda Grass Thymus spp. Thyme
Festuca elatior Meadow Fescue Vinca spp. Periwinkle
Hemerocallis spp. Daylily
Liriope spp. Creeping
Lily Turf
Sansevieria spp. Mother-in-laws
Tongue NOTES: All trees in paved areas are to
be provided with "Deep Root"
barriers and a 4 ' diameter tree
Strelitzia reginae BirParradise well with automatic irrigation
and metal grates.
Yucca recurvifolia Curve-leaf
Yucca Soils testing for agricultural
suitability is to be required on
GROL'NDCOVERS each site with laboratory
recommendations followed.
Arenaria spp. Sandwort
Cotoneaster horizontalis None
Juniperus horizontalis None
Lantana spp. None
Liriope spicata Lily Turf
Lonicera japonica Japanese
Honeysuckle
Ophiopogon spp. Mando Grass
Pachysandra terminalis Japanese
Spurge
LIGHTING
Lighting within the Downtown area will
serve to create a festive atomsphere and
encourage night time use of the area by
pedestrians.
Lighting fixtures should be attractively
designed to complement the architecture
of the project.
Lighting should also improve the visual
identification of residences and
businesses.
Lighting should be focussed to avoid
disturbance in living and sleeping areas
in adjacent residential projects.
All parking lots should be lighted
adequately for safety and theft
protection.
Night time lighting of buildings within
the commercial areas is encouraged.
Lights which outline. the buildings create
a festive atmosphere and encourage the
use of open spaces and plazas.
SIGNS
SIGNS
Signage in downtown Huntington Beach
should advertise a place of business or
provide directions or information and
should contribute to the contemporary
Mediterranean theme. Design, color ,
materials and placement are all important
aspects in creating signs that are
architecturally attractive and integrated
with the overall site design . The City ' s
goal is to promote a quality visual
environment by allowing only signs which
are compatible with their surroundings
and which effectively communicate their
message.
Due to the unique nature of the downtown
area there are some special provisions
and restrictions with respect to
permitted signs . The purpose of this
section of the Design Guidelines is to
set forth design standards which may be
more restrictive than those outlined in
the huntington Beach Sign Code, Article
976. Unless specifically allowed or
restricted within this section, all signs
are subject to Article 976 of the Sign
Code.
GENERAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Good signs communicate their message
well, are easily seen by people and o Ground level signs should be
relate harmoniously with the building smaller than those above ground
they are placed on or near. The level. Pedestrian-oriented signs
following guidelines give criteria for should be smaller than automobile
creating well-designed signs. oriented signs.
COLOR - Sign color should relate to O Signs should establish rhythm, .
building colors. A light background with scale and proportion in facades and
dark lettering is best visually. Bright arcades.
colors should be used for accent . No
more than two or three colors should be o Placement on a facade should
used on a sign. complement building elements rather
than block them.
WORDS/SYMBOLS Fewer words make a more
effective message. Use symbols only if ILLUMINATION - There are two methods of
they are easily recognizable. illuminating signs : internal with the.
light source inside the sign and external
SHAPE - Keep the overall shape simple so with an outside light directed at the
as not to detract from the message. sign.
PROPORTION - As . a general rule, letters o Internal illumination is permitted
should not appear to occupy more than 75% on channel letters only.
of sign panel area.
o All other signs must be illuminated
LETTERING - Avoid hard-to-read and overly externally.
intricate typefaces. The letter style
choosen should be appropriate to the o Signs should be lighted with
business and the building. continuous light sources.
SIZE/LOCATION - Signs should be Following are definitions and examples of
consistent with the proportion and scale the different types of allowable signs.
of building elements within the facade. The following examples are provided to
The placement of signs gives visual clues stimulate ideas.
to business location and affects the
design integrity of the entire building.
SIGN STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL USES
• � LL nn��XX rr,,UUcc XX II pp EE
USE OF SIGN TYPE MJUMBER SI1GiV IA & 0 GHT STANDARDS
BUINESS FREESTANDING ONE PER SITE 15 SO. FT,. G FT. 1. ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS SHALL BE
IDENTIFICATION PROVIDED THE OR LOCATED IN A LANDSCAPED PLANTER
STRUCTURE ON 40 SO. FT, WITH P10 PORTION OF THE SIGN EX-
THE SITE IS FOR WOODEN TENDING BEYOND THE PERIMETER OF
SETBACK A SANDBLASTED THE PLANTER,
MINIMUM QQF SIGNS 2. ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS MUST BE
TWENTY (10) OF THE MONUMENT TYPE,
FT, AND THAT
THE SITE HAS 3. COPY SHALL BE LIMITED TO CENTER
A MINIMUM OF IDENTIFICATION AND/OR MAJOR
100 FT. OF TENANT IDENTIFICATION,
FRONTAGE, 4. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION IS PERMIT-
TED FOR CHANNEL LETTERS ONLY,
WALL ONE PER 1.0 SO. FT, u FT, 1. SIGNS SHALL BE CHANNEL LETTERS
OR STREET OR PER LINEAR FOR WALL SIGNS.
AWNING PARKING LOT FOOT.OF Z. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION IS PERMIT-
FRONTAGE BUILDING TED FOR CHANNEL LETTERS ONLY.
FOR EACH FRONTAGE 3. NO PAINTED SIGNS PERMITTED,
SEPARATE
BUSINESS 4, MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT IS 18 INCHES.
UNDER ONE PER 4 SO. FT. 1. 0 INTERNAL ILLUMINATION PERMITTED.
CANOPY BUSINESSOR MINIMUM
PROJECTING GROUND
LEARANCE
FT,
IENANT WALL ONE PER SITE 12 SQ. FT, H FT, 1. SIGN SHALL BE UNILLUMINATED,
DIRECTORY Z. SIGN SHALL BE LOCATED AND ORIENTED
TO THE PEDESTRIAN RATHER THAN TO
THE STREET.
3. ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS. SHALL BE
LOCATED IN A LANDSCAPED PLANTER
WITH NO PORTION EXTENDING BEYOND
THE PERIMETER OF THE PLANTER,
SPECIAL FLAGS UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED UNSPECIFIED FLAGS, BANNERS, AND PENNANTS
BANNERS ARE PERMITTED AS TEMPORARY
PENNANTS SIGNS PURSUANT TO THE SIGN
CODE,
This chart summarizes sign criteria for commercial signs within the downtown area.
signs for residential uses shall follow the Huntington Beach Sign Code. For
mixed uses commercial signs shall follow the above chart and signs for the
residential uses shall follow the sign code as stated above.
•' 'AWNING SIGNS
Definition: An awning sign is a sign on
or attached to a temporary retractable
shelter that is supported from the _.;; -" ;
exterior wall of a building. These signs
are permitted in the downtown area r
pursuant to the Sign Standards chart.
o Sign copy should be centered on the
on awning to achieve symmetry.
o Message should be limited to the '
business name and logo and sized to
be proportional with the awning.
BANNERS
Definition: Banners and flags include
any cloth, plastic, paper or similar
material used for advertising purposes
attached to or suspended from any
structure, staff, pole, line, framing, or
vehicle. These are permitted subject to
the discretion of the. Design Review
Board. A flag of the nation or state of
California shall be exempt from these
regulations.
Bright colors are appropriate because
they stand out against light-colored
backgrounds.
Banners and flags add motion and promote
pedestrian activity in the area.
:x
�a
NMI
_ �•�t�•7 'ysc r,'3 sy �+'`A ,+.' a C•_r .,,:p...r,.aF: ��:a7t:j
+��•w his.. ..� �k i P}`:� i:.!y:.:.:*.:., g
i. '�. `>M1:_ '^✓F�;
/ems+
3:- '='. .��i+ t. ::3,-.<�'.:�Y,. _"r i�,..s f`it.�='::y:._•�.',':.a?p:.t.i. :
y:�:. .�,-�,i 2._;t'S,:Y. '•'=:.c � 4 :'p ::�.. a.; � 5.ti:.:.:;.', r...;.:,-..":1,^G•`>}'a�".:,::, =.5:v�•.t"' •{r,
..1:,3� 2 F' .l`.ii:r ':ii�. 'fir^' f'lin'•'r- S r
0
CANOPY SIGNS
Definition : A canopy sign is any sign
attached to the underside of a projecting
canopy or protruding over a sidewalk or
right-of-way.
Canopy signs provide pedestrian scale and
can enhance building fronts.
Projecting signs are permitted as a
special type of canopy sign.
4. OCEAN
vn ;
tl
FREESTANDING SIGNS
Definition: A freestanding sign is any
sign where the primary structural support
is not a building and which is
permanently anchored or attached on the
ground.
The mediterranean theme can be suggested
through the use of materials such as
stucco and tile.
Pole signs are not permitted in the
downtown area.
®e.
l. .
•` } •`WALL SIGNS
Definition: Any sign which is attached
or erected on the exterior wall of a
building including the parapet, with the
display surface of the sign parallel to i
the building wall, and which does not
project more than eighteen (18 ) inches -
from the building or project above the
height of the wall or parapet .
Brightly colored channel letters add to
the festive atmosphere and may be
illuminated internally.
Wall murals can brighten and add interest
to the downtown area. Wall murals should
be done to enhance the area rather than
for advertising . Wall murals shall be
permitted. subject to the discretion of
the Design Review Board.
. ." WINDOW SIGNS
Definition: A window sign is any sign in
which the name, address, hours and/or
logo of a business are applied directly
to the window. Letters may be vinyl or
painted.
Interior signs should be within 36" of
the °window so as to be readable from the
exterior .
Sign area must be less than 20% of the
total window area.
Window signs should be geared to the
pedestrian and should be at eye level .
Window signs, if aesthetically designed,
can enhance fronts of shops.
Q� I � N
ITHM MOAN
�Q, r
D D `13Ht°
.... .... .... .... ............. .... .... ..... ... ... ... ..
... . ... ..... ....
X,
:•i
f
o
77t;9"
REQUEAFOR CITY COUNCIL CTION
May 10 1989 /04
Date Y �
Submitted to: Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator l� c
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ^` a
Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator c�
Subject: Pierside Village Restaurant Pro'e L - 19 -�-<�
Ln nCP
CITY CLERIC
Consistent with Council Policy? ( ] Yes [ ] New Policy or E ception .
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
Statement of Issuer
There is the need to determine further direction toward the development of the Pierside
Village restaurant project.
Recommendation:
Authorize staff to negotiate a lease with Stanley M. Bloom to develop the Pierside Village .
restaurant project which will generally consist of three new restaurants in addition to the
existing Maxwells.Restaurant.
Analysis:
Since the City Council approved,the concept of restaurants in Pierside .Village with no
other retail uses, staff has been communicating with StanleyM. Bloom who was to be a
partner with Bryant Morris in the original Pierside Village project regarding this revised
project. Mr. Bloom bought out Mr. Morris' interests in the project and desires to lease the
city's land, construct approximately-300 parking space in a two—level structure, and
develop around 30,000 square feet of restaurant use which would result in 3 first—class
restaurants in the city's Main—Pier redevelopment area. Staff and the city's financial and
legal consultants have been meeting with Mr. Bloom and reviewing his pro forma for this
project. It is felt that it is in the Redevelopment Agency's best financial interest to lease
their property and receive a percentage of the gross sales over the life of the project
rather than risk around $9 million'of the city's money and proceed with the project on our
own.
Preliminary deal.points have been discussed with Mr. Bloom, and it appears that a revised
Pierside Village lease which will be satisfactory to both parties can be.negotiated rather
quickly.
Funding Source:
No funds are necessary at this time:
PI O 5/85
Pierside Village Restaurant Project
May 10, 1989
Page -2-
Alternative Actions:
1. Proceed with this project with the Redevelopment Agency acting as the developer;
2. Solicit another developer for the project;
3. Do not proceed with the project.
Attachments:
None.
PEC:pf
#0510q-94
6N,
y
MINUTES
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, March 24, 1986
A tape recording of this meeting is
on file in the City Clerk's Office
Mayor Mandic called the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Thomas (arrived 7:42 P.M. )
Absent: None
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Mayor Mandic announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and the Rede-
velopment Agency had been called.
}
ROLL CALL
Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
Thomas (arrived 7:42 P.M. )
Absent: None
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY 129 - DEFERRED TO LATER IN THE MEET-
ING - MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
The Mayor/Chairman announced that this was the day and hour set for a public
h_a-ing continued open from March 17, 1986 on Resolution of Necessity which
delineates parcels in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Subarea which may poten-
tially require public acquisition.
The City Attorney/legal advisor to the Agency introduced documents into evi-
dence into the record as follows:
1. Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project and Ordinance
No. 2634 adopting the plan.
2. Proposed Resolution of Public Interest and Necessity with attached maps
and descriptions. -a
i
3. Letter to Huntington Beach Company dated February 27, 1986 making offer
to purchase.
Page 2 - Council Minutes - 3/24/86
4. Notice of Eminent Domain Proceedings with attached Proof of Service. ,
:1
5. Letter from Lawler, Felix & Hall dated March 13, 1986, on behalf of the
Huntington Beach Company.
6. Letter from Green Burrito Restaurant dated March 5, 1986.
7. Planning and Negotiating Agreement with Huntington Pacifica Development
Group dated August 20, 1984.
8. Proposed Disposition and Development Agreement with the Huntington Paci-
fica Development Group.
9. Restated First Implementation Agreement dated February 21, 1986.
10. Declaration of Appraiser dated February 26, 1986.
11. Copy of Assessor's Rolls from Assessor Parcel numbers 24-281-03,
24-281-04 and 24-281-12.
12. Copy of deed to the City of Huntington Beach dated January 15, 1932, set-
ting forth the interest of the city.
There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no further
protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor/-
Chairman.
Following discussion, by consensus . of Agency consideration of Resolution of 'I
Necessity for Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area was deferred to later in '
the meeting after a Closed Session of Council/Redevelopment Agency.
MAIN-PIER PHASE I - HUNTINGTON PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP STATUS REPORT
Doug LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment, presented a staff
report.
Discussion was held regarding retail space, decking and pier improvements.
Discussion was held regarding the proposed Pier Side Village developer/opera-
tor Bryant L. Morris Development Company; and Paragon Hotels Corporation as
the developer/operator of the Main-Pier Phase 1 hotel. Mr. LaBelle referred
to two draft letters dated March 25, 1986 recommending terms and conditions to
the acceptance of both of the proposed developer/operators.
Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to
accept as Pier Side Village Developer/Operator Bryant A. Morris Company with
conditions as set forth in a draft letter dated March 25, 1986 from the City
Administrator to Mr. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows:
1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted for this portion
of the project, pursuant to the First Implekentation Agreement, by the
May 1, deadline. That includes the total development concept for Pier
Side Village Phase I & II.
2. No later than Monday, March 31, you must provide to us a copy of an
Agreement that you have entered into with Bryant L. Morris Development
,YY'
! Page 3 - Council Minutes - 3/24/86
for the "Pier Side Village" project. The project must also be constructed in
accordance with the scope and quality and as an integral part of the total
development as provided for in the Disposition and Development Agreement, pre-
viously entered into.
I with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates
of both the pier side village and hotel portions of the project and that the
I� project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/
Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to accept Paragon Hotels
Corporation as the developer/operator of the Main-Pier Phase 1 hotel, subject
to the following terms and conditions as outlined in the letter from the City
Administrator to Mr. Stanley Bloom, Randall Foods, as follows:
1. That formal entitlement plans be prepared and submitted for this portion
of the project, pursuant to the First Implementation Agreement, by the
May 1 deadline.
2. The hotel must be of the scope and quality of that intended within the
original Disposition and Development Agreement (Irvine Marriott quality) .
3. The hotel franchise is subject to the approval of the City/Agency.
4. The hotel must provide for restaurant(s) and public meeting areas with
banquet facilities the scope of which are subject to the approval of the
City/Agency.
5. No later than Monday, March 31, you must provide to us a letter from the
Huntington Pacifica Development Group indicating that Paragon Hotels is
both the operator and developer you have selected to develop and operate
this portion of the project.
with the caveat that there is a tie together between the developmental dates
of both the pier side village and hotel portions of the project and that the
project be completed in a time frame which is of economic benefit to the City/
Agency. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: Finley, Bailey
ABSENT: None
NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT - APPROVED - MAIN-PIER PHASE II PROJECT - MAIN-PACIFIC
PROPERTY OWNERS
The Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Clerk presented a communication from Deputy City
Administrator/Redevelopment transmitting a Negotiation Agreement between the
I Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Main Pacific Property Owners rela-
tive to the six-acre site bounded by Main, 6th, Walnut and Pacific Coast High-
way.