Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile 2 of 2 - Proposed Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopme KatzHolfts Katz Hollis Inc.&Associatess,, Inc ' Financial Consultants 1 1 1 1 102584 Katz Hol l is MMJNMC 1 1 1 i i 1 PARTS II AND III of the REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL on the PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for the 1 TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 i 1 r ' Prepared by KATZ, HOLLIS, COREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for the HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY October, 1984 Katz Hol l is TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA. . . . . . . . II-1 A. Existing Physical Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 ' 1. Project Location.. . . . . . . . . . . II-1 2. Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 a. Existing Land Uses and Acreages. . . . . II-1 b. Community Facilities . . . . . . . . . . II-2 - c. Predominantly Urbanized Area . . . . . . II-2 3. Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 a. Lots (Parcels) Subject To Being Sub- merged By Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facili- ties and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . II-4 (1) Development of the Flood Control System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I-5 (2) Channel Deficiencies. . . . . II-6 (3) Pumping Station Deficiencies. . . . II-8 (4) Storm Drain Deficiencies. . . . . . II-9 (5) Drainage Systems Improvements Planned or Under Construction . . . II-10 (6) Drainage System Improvements Under Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . II-11 B. Existing Social Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . II-12 C. Existing Economic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . II-13 PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 A. 'General FinancingMethods Available to Agency. III-1 B. Tax Increment Financing Method . . . . . . . . . . III-1 C. Estimated Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 D. Proposed Financing Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . III-4 (i) 1 KatzHollis TABLE OF MAPS Page Following MAP 1 General Plan Land Uses Within Project Area . . . . II-1 MAP 2 February 16, 1983 Flood Insurance Rate Map . . . . II-2 MAP 3 Flooded Areas Resulting From March, 1983 Storm . . II-3 MAP 4 Drainage Channels and Pumping Stations . . . . . . II-4 MAP 5 Deficient Storm Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-9 MAP 6 Talbert Valley Channels Project Locations. . . . . II-2 TABLE OF TABLES Table II-1 Project Area Land Uses. . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 Table III-1 Estimated Public Improvements and Facilities Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . III-3 Table III-2 Estimated Project Costs . . . . . . . . . III-4 1 PHOTOGRAPHS Plates 1 through 13. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-12 (ii) Katz Hol 1 i s ' PARTS II AND III OF THE REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INTRODUCTION The following two sections of the Report to the City Council (•City Council') of the City of Huntington Beach on the proposed Rede- velopment Plan ('Redevelopment Plan•) for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project (•Project') , have been prepared by Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. (Katz Hollis) for the Huntington Beach Redevel- opment Agency ('Agency•) pursuant to Sections 33352(b) and (c) of the 1 California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. ) : Description of Physical, Social and Economic Conditions Existing in Project Area, and Proposed Method of Financing Redevelopment of Project Area. Two additional sections of the Report to City Council will be prepared by Katz Hollis and submitted subsequent to receipt of required documents, or completion of the activities of the authorities involved: Summary of Consultations With Affected Taxing Agencies, and Analysis of Report of the County Fiscal Officer (CRL Section 33352(m] ) . Agency staff are preparing all remaining sections of the Report to City Council on the proposed Project Redevelopment Plan. The sec- tions contained herein and those to be prepared by Katz Hollis at a later date, together with the sections prepared by Agency staff, consti- tute the full Report to City Council. i 1 . (1) t Katz Holl is . PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA Information presented in this Part II of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency's Report to City Council on the Proposed Redevelop- ment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project was compiled from various sources, including: -- Interviews with staff of the Agency, City, County and Coun- ty environmental consultants. -- A review and analysis of various reports, documents, photo- graphs, plans (including the General Plan) and other back- ground data provided by City/Agency staff. -- A field survey of the Project Area conducted by Katz Hollis , in August, 1984. The principal objective of the survey was to confirm and photographically document Project Area con- ditions. In general, all sources of data are cited throughout this Part II of the Report to City Council. -A. Existing Physical Conditions 1. Project Location The geographical area encompassed by the Talbert Gap Redevelop- ment Project (the 'Project Area') .forms a U-shape with an' irregular boundary that follows arterial streets and includes approximately 1,200 feet on either side of the three drainage channels that lie south of Talbert Avenue in the southeastern portion of the City of Huntington Beach. Garfield Avenue, a portion of the northern boundary, and Newland Street, a portion of the eastern boundary, separate Huntington Beach and the City of Fountain Valley. The Huntington Beach Channel (drainage channel D01) forms the southernmost boundary. The location of the Proj- ect Area within the City of Huntington Beach and its surrounding envi- rons can be seen in Map 1. 1 2. Land Uses a. Existing Land Uses and Acreages The land uses permitted by the Huntington Beach General Plan are an accurate reflection of existing land uses in the Project Area. A land use diagram of the General Plan is exhibited in Map 1. There are a variety of uses in the Project Area, with residential uses predominating. Project Area land uses and acreages are presented in Table II-1. (II-1) 1 { :rakLand Use CaIsgorle: WON J RESIDENTIALE;l Low Density ®Medium Density 'A) .®High Density COMMERCIAL � (j :�_����`�. � 1- VilrlK`I d '.�„ ,n �:r,,,,. , .• ... ! &NGeneral ®Visitor - Serving INDUSTRIAL ..� - General , ..� - a. jl.�11. Y r•--- I. OPEN SPACE Recreation _ • �_ � OTHER USES T =�•r'•III� of Itt'I : MPublic,Quasi-Publ_:, l jl•"i'' �� �,:1:' ����,. Institutional Planned Community Q Planning Reserve �'`• � _ 'F� :fir � � r' � U I 1 # : ��T'-- �'" •a:' l�iln. 'I ., {' :9''.,�I I� - •.�;II -;trt` :��' �.1.._ - -/�•�� •__ I,,�'t-!' _•t •'% C�> •dam I •I IJW r - — --. '�. ♦ I nt l� Yi�� •l/�Ji�Si,��� '11]Lllmf I' _ ,':.�`-" I 1�...: i._ •��_ ,�_...�L '' ' 'I� 7� LEUMUL /f. vj i isUT j 1 /1 L N J � '..\ I + III •4;.•:• r _' 11 •••• NCI . II: mrin > l -TTi PARE ` - I' i►l }�� GENERAL PLAN LAND USES WITHIN PROJECT AREA ' SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEP'T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES KatZ HOl1- TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Katz Hof l is Table II-1 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Project PROJECT AREA LAND USES r Percentage ' Land Use Acres of Total Residential 1,658 82% Commercial 61 3% Industrial 20 1% Public Uses, including Open Space, Planning Reserve, Institutional, Streets, and Utility Right-of-ways 162 8% Vacant 121 68 TOTAL 2_,022 IJUA 1 - ' Source: Huntington Beach Department of Development Services 1 KatzHollis ' The residential areas include at least four large mobile home parks. Commercial areas are generally local-serving retail. b. Community Facilities The Project Area contains two fire stations (the Bushard Street and Lake Street Stations) , the Banning Street Library Annex, the Edison Community Center, ten schools, and three parks. The parks are typically ' located adjacent to schools. Elementary schools in the Project Area in- clude: Peterson, William E. Kettler, Eader, Isaac Sowers, Wardlow, Tal- bert and St. Francis. Edison High School, the Huntington Special Center and a branch of Coastline Community College also lie in, and serve, the Project Area. C. Predominantly Urbanized Area The Project Area is an area of the community which is a predomi- nantly urbanized area in that not less than 80 percent of the privately owned property in the Project Area has been or is developed for urban uses. 3. Properties ' The Project Area is characterized by properties which suffer from the threat of deterioration or disuse because of the factors described 1 below and illustrated in part by the photographs appearing in Plates 1 through 13. ' a. Lots (parcels) Subject to Being Submerged by Water Flooding and flood control problems are the most important blight factors impacting the Project Area. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's current Flood Insurance Rate Map, exhibited in Map 2, shows at a glance that virtually all of the Project Area lies in a 100-year flood plain. The western boundary of the Project Area has been described as the former west bank of the Santa Ana River. Both 100-year floods and 100-year storms are defined as phenomena 1 that do not necessarily occur only once every hundred years, but gener- ally have a 1% probability of occurring in any given year. While a 100- year flood typically results from a 100-year storm, such a storm, though causing a very intensive rainfall, may be localized in a small geograph- ical area. A 100-year flood typically represents a much greater volume of water than a 100-year storm, with effects on a larger geographical area. The northern portions of the Project Area are within zone AO, de- fined as an area subject to a 100-year flood, with inundation between one and three feet' but .no flood hazard factors determined. Average inun- (II-2) R 3 7-1 1rAN ZO NE AO (DEPTH EPT H 3 ZONE AO (DEPTH 1) ..�. ZONE AH EL 1 •u ZC)NE d E DEPTH 2) Z ZONE AO (DEPTH 3) ' yCw EOLM 1TICN A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factions not determined. ZONE A8 (EL 11-14) AD Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths am between one (1) and three(3) feet; average depths of inwidation are sho+n. but no flood hazard factors are determined. ZONE Al2 ' All Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are (EL 11) ru+� 4etyaeet one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood elevations are sham, but no flood hazard factors determined. Al-A30 Areas of JOG-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. ry 1 R Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500-year flood; or certain areas s> )ect to 100-year flooding with average depths legs then acne (1) foot or wh w the contributing drairaye —N— arm is legs than one square mile; or areas protcxud by levees tram the base flood. C Arrvin of minimal flonling. V Arevw of 100-yaar cnantsl ric%xi with vrincity (wnvs. artiem); lam-. flnrrl elevations aryl flood hiznrd fachwa rrA eMe•rmined. Vl-V30 Areas of 100-your coantal flood with velocity (tome a`tic'); ham f lend �lati� �l flood FEBRUARY 16, 1983 hazard factors determined. ' FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SOURCE:FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Kaullollis TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 2 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KatzHollis dation depth is estimated at three feet. The remainder of the Project Area is within flood zones A8 (EL11-14) and Al2 (Ell) , defined as areas ' subject to a 100-year flood with base flood elevations between eleven and fourteen feet or below eleven feet, respectively. The source of the flood threat in these three zones is the Santa Ana River, adjacent to the Project Area on the east. Huntington Beach is part of a larger drainage basin which covers 3,200 square miles and includes much of Orange County. Regional agen- cies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Orange County Flood Control District, are responsible for providing drainage facili- ties which are adequate to accommodate runoff from all sections of the basin, so that rain falling outside the City of Huntington Beach will flow into the regional facilities and be carried through the City to the ocean. Deficiencies in drainage facilities serving the entire basin have increased the risk of flooding in Huntington Beach much more than in other areas of the basin. ' Over time, design standards for flood control and drainage facil- ities in Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach have changed. Currently the Federal Emergency Management Agency standard requires that flood control facilities should accommodate a storm of 100-year inten- sity. Most of the regional facilities, however, are constructed at 65% design capacity of a twenty-five year storm. The Orange County Director of Public Works reported that an intense storm on March 1, 1983 appeared to be in the 100-year frequency range and helped expose the seriousness of deficiencies in the regional flood control system. This is discussed in more detail below. ' Lots that were flooded during the March', 1983 storm are shown on Map 3. The Red Cross prepared reports of major damage to 182 houses, ' almost all in the Project Area. The City Fire Department estimated that city-wide, 200 homes suffered major damage totaling $13.4 million and an additional 580 homes were damaged to some degree. Voluntary evacuation was urged for the more than 30,000 residents south of Garfield Avenue ' and east of Beach Boulevard, with 800 ordered to evacuate their homes by emergency services personnel. Several hundred residents spent the night in five evacuation shelters. City staff estimate that emergency services and repairs to cor- rect damages caused by the storm cost eight City departments close to $500,000. Expenses necessitated by the storm included: roadway repairs; sandbagging; barricade and emergency equipment rental; debris removal; damages to streets signs, lights, and traffic control panels; tree loss; electrical costs to restore service; pump station repairs; ' and shelter, transportation and feeding costs related to the evacu- ations. Suits against the City for claims for damages from the flood have totalled nearly $100 million. Resolution of the suits will cost an estimated $100,000 to $300,000 in salaries and court costs alone. It is (II-3) xis 1 ' 4HANNEL A n,uie► EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL DOS 1 1 aas � 1 l ' HARPER i 1 Y�RKTOWN P.S. CHANNEL I r 1 OUNDER.P.S;� 1 '• ADAMS .S TA�BERT 'MIDI• APOLIS P'.S' CHf►NNEL 1 002 i i �ATLANTA P S:i GTON BEACH MEREDITH P.S. i 1 • 1 L D01 ti i ! I HAMILTON r Ill:?IND P.S. P.S� i ING P.S. I SANTA ANA I S i RIVER E01 FLOODED AREA i OVERTOPPED LEVEE / • ' . PUMPING STATION 1� 1� 1 FLOODED AREAS RESULTING FROM MARCH, 1983 STORM SOURCES:.HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT AMERICAN RED CROSS ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER ' HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ENGINEER 1 KatzHollis ILIERT GAP FLOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT OL MAP 3 1 KatzHollis 1 clear that the 1983 storm imposed a severe impact upon the City's fi- nancial and other resources. Unless measures are taken to correct the flood control system deficiencies, a similar disaster could reoccur at any time. Photographs shown on plates 1 through 7 were taken in early March, 1983 and depict the flooded areas and drainage channel failures. The front page of the 'Huntington Beach Independent' newspaper portrays the gravity of the problem. Plate 3 illustrates the levee failures that were partly responsible for the flooding of the mobile home park south of Garfield and west of Brookhurst, depicted in Plate 2. Construction of a partial lining of that portion of the channel is now underway by the Orange County Flood Control District, as shown in Plate 12. ' Flooding in the area to the west of the Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) north of Atlanta, south of Indianapolis and east of Beach is shown from the air in Plate 4. Water rose to eight feet in the streets (Plate 5, top) and 'commercial, as well as residential, properties were affected ' (Plate 5, bottom) . The channel adjacent to that area, flowing close to the top, is shown in Plate 6. Overtopped levees were the cause of flooding in the area, around Adams Avenue between Beach Boulevard and 1 Newland Street, viewed in Plate 7. b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facilities and Utilities The drainage system, comprised of storm drain pipes, pumping sta- tions and flood control channels, suffers from numerous deficiencies. These deficiencies have been the contributing factor in the flooding of 1 residential and other lots in the Project Area,- as described in the pre- ceding section. The general layout of the system within the Project Area, consisting of three flood control channels totalling nearly eleven ' miles, and nine pumping stations, is exhibited in Map 4. Several agencies are responsible for providing and maintaining ' the drainage system. The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) is responsible for those regional flood control facilities in the County of Orange which serve more than one jurisdiction and for drainage facilities which drain areas of 500 acres or greater. County facilities within the Project Area include one pumping station and three earthern channels. Local drainage facilities that drain 500 acres. or less are under the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach. Within the ' Project Area, the City maintains eight pumping stations plus local storm drains leading to and from the pumping stations. While the OCFCD is responsible for the Santa Ana River channel, the U.S. Army Corps of En- gineers holds responsibility for major flood control projects throughout the country, and is planning large scale flood control improvements to the Santa Ana River. The river lies just to the east of the Project ' Area and forms the southeastern boundary of the City of Huntington Beach. 1 (II-4) SLAM ' +mMI NEL d TAIMU ' EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL 005 1 1 I Eun HARPER 1 r-- Y�'RKTOWN P.B. CHANNEL �• ' I 1 � I I FLOUNDER P.S� • KTOriM 4 AOAMS 0< 1 P.S. 194 I I I i I y I ADAMS ;.S. TA, BERT INDIANAPOLIS P.S.' CHj%WNEL D02 i f NOIANAPOUK I I k AT NTA P.S. I i MEREDITH P.S. I HUNT NGTON BEACH i j CHANNEL D01 •nAMa I NEWLAND P.S. HAP STON I I BANNING P.S. I S SANTA ANA ' I I RIVER E01 LEGEND mom CITY CHANNELS. 'k CITY PUMP STATIONS � COUNTY CHANNELS COUNTY PUMP STATION m Drainage Channels & Pumping Stations ' SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEFT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES KatzHollis TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 4 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 KatzHollis ' (1) Development of the Flood Control System Overall, the Orange County Flood Control District is working with ' a flood control system that was constructed to 65% design capacity for a 25-year flood for an anticipated population of 340,000 people, now meet- ing the needs of a population of two million and the standards of a 100- year level of protection. A combination of factors - rapid population growth, development pressures, changing standards, and funding con- straints - have produced the current condition of the flood control sys- tem. Due to the City's geographical position at the ocean outlet of the flood control system serving a drainage basin of 3,200 square miles the City is impacted disproportionately by the regional system's deficiencies. In 1954, the County Board of Supervisors commissioned a study on the construction and improvement of flood control facilities in the County. The report, submitted in 1955, found the existing facilities ' could not accommodate future growth in the County, and projected a popu- lation of 340,000 by 1960. The report recognized that construction of the entire system to. ultimate design capacity would be prohibitively ' costly, so initial construction of minimum requirements (earth lined channels) was recommended. The plan provided for acquiring sufficient rights-of-way so that channels could be upgraded with concrete lining and design improvements as needed. The ultimate runoff quantities in the 1955 plan were based on the following criteria: main flood control facilities to handle runoff from ' a storm that may reasonably be expected to occur every 25 years in flat urban areas, every 50 years in foothill areas, and every 100 years in areas controlled by dams. ' In 1956, a bond issue was approved by the County's voters to fund channel construction. Most channels were built of earth, providing 2/3 of the 25-year protection level with concrete lining intended to provide the additional 1/3 capacity when funds were available for construction. Improvements continued to be built to the 1956 standards until 1973 when a higher level of protection was adopted with the acceptance of the fed- eral standards in the National Flood Insurance Act, based on a 100-year flood, as the criteria for construction. ' With the exception of the 1956 bond issue, no bond issues for flood control have passed in the last 30 years. Elections failed in 1966 and 1967. Construction of new facilities and improvements to existing facilities have been funded by regular property tax revenues, ' by interest on flood control monies, by developers as part of their conditions of development for specific projects, and, since Proposition ' 13, by special district augmentation funds. Understandably, these sources have not produced adequate funds to improve all channels to cur- rent standards. Improvements have been funded on an annual basis, sub- ject to available funds, with priorities established annually by recom- mendations of the City Engineers Flood Control Advisory Committee. (II-5) 1 1 KatzHollis 1 Huntington Beach's local serving drainage system, similar to many other newer Orange County cities, initially developed .in an ad-hoc man- ner with little engineering, planning or design to correlate the facil- ity size with expected rainfall runoff and future integration into a total system. I'n 1960, the City adopted the first Master Plan of Drain- age, and has had numerous revisions since. (2) Channel Deficiencies ' City drainage facilities are designed to accommodate only the water that falls in Huntington Beach, but the City is part of a larger 1 drainage basin and contains regional flood control facilities that serve all of the basin. Rainfall. falling outside the City is expected to flow into these regional channels, the responsibility of the Orange County Flood Control District, and be carried through the City. As previously 1 discussed, however, the channels are generally operating at 65% of 25- year storm capacity, so that during a 100-year storm, areas of the City adjacent to regional channels are subject to flooding. Therefore Hunt- ington Beach is forced to suffer from deficiencies in a regional-serving system. 1 In April, 1983, following the 100-year storm of March, 1983 des- cribed above, the Director of Public Works of the Orange County Environ- mental Management Agency prepared a report for the Agency's Executive Director regarding the channel failures in the Talbert Valley area. The 1 report stated in part: The unusual convergence of high tides, high surf and a 1 rainstorm on January 27, 1983 gave the first serious indi- cation of potential flood channel problems when an 8.5 foot tide began affecting leveed channels in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. When the Huntington Beach Channel began to overflow, sandbagging operations were successful in maintaining the integrity of the levee. A breach in the levee damaged by ground squirrel activity was also contain- ed by . sandbagging operations at that time with minimal flooding of private property. ' Details of the channel failures resulting from the March, 1983 storm, as contained in the Public Works Director's report, were as fol- lows: 1 Huntington Beach Channel (Channel DO1) ' -- U/S DO2 confluence left side - Flow in excess of channel capacity combined with high surf and high tide. Problem exacerbated by levee set- tlement caused by compressible underlying strata. 1 i 1 Katz Roll is U/S Magnolia to Newland, both sides. Flow in excess of channel capacity combined with high ' surf, high tide and levee settlement. -- D/S Atlanta, left side. ' High surf, high tide and heavy rains caused flow in excess of channel capacity. Levee breached by erosive effect of overflow. -- U/S Atlanta to Adams, both sides. Same as above. ' Talbert Channel (Channel D02) Left side at D01 confluence. 1 Flooding adjacent area because of high water in chan- nel coming out of existing CMP which had a broken floodgate. 1 U/S Banning at Walk Bridge, both sides. Overtopping because of low profile of city installed walk bridge and flow in excess of channel capacity. U/S Atlanta, left side. Overtopping caused backslope erosion and breaches in ' two areas. High surf, high tide and heavy rains re- sulted in flow in excess of channel capacity. -- U/S Adams at Walk Bridge, both sides. 1 Overtopped 3 inches. Same as above. -- D/S Yorktown, left side. Breach initiated by undetected gopher hole and high flow in channel. 1 Fountain Valley Channel (Channel D05) -- Flood U/S of confluence with D02. There were several reasons for the channel failures. In the Hun- tington Beach - Fountain Valley area, the leveed design of the channels 1 makes them more vulnerable to breaching during heavy runoff than incised channels where localized erosion was the more prevalent mode of damage. A major factor in the March, 1983 storm was the occurrence of tidal backwater during the storm which further impacted channel flow. Storm runoff from streets was pumped into the leveed channels where tidal con- ditions and runoff from the upstream areas were already causing high channel flows. Levee overflow back into the streets overtaxed the pumping (II-7) i 1 KatzHollis 1 stations. Damage to levees from burrowing animals was said to be not significant given the high intensity rainfall and runoff conditions of 1 the storm. High surf and a backflow into the channels during high tide exacerbated conditions but the single overriding factor in the channel failures was rainfall intensities and runoff rates in excess of channel ' capacity. (3) Pumping Station Deficiencies 1 Pumping stations are a critical element in the drainage system, removing rain water from the storm drains below the street and deposit- ing the water into the drainage channels. Pumping station failure dur- ing a high volume storm could produce significant flooding in the area drained by the pumping station. Plates 8 and 9 and Map 4 depict the pumping stations within the Project Area. Six of the eight pumping sta- tions within the Project Area owned by the City of Huntington Beach re- quire improvements ranging from replacement of pumps and engines to con- struction of an additional building with two pumps. The County owned pumping station (Plate 13, top) was recently refurbished. 1 In 1979, the Citycommissioned the firm of L. D. Kin Engineer- ing, 9 9 ing, Inc. to analyze the capacity and condition of the City's pumping 1 stations. A number of deficiencies were identified, with improvements implemented since the conclusion of the study. However, City staff have identified the following pump station deficiencies, and improvements 1 that are currently needed: -- Flounder Pump Station, 9731 Flounder Lane - Major modifica- tions of the pump station and incoming line are needed be- cause incoming flows are much greater than the established run-off reported in the Master Plan for Drainage, resulting in localized flooding. 1 -- Indianapolis Pump Station, 9221 Indianapolis Avenue - Re- placement of two of the smaller engines and pumps with 1 larger units is needed because incoming flows are greater than those reported in the Master Plan for Drainage. 1 -- Newland Pump Station, 8612 Hamilton Avenue - Construction of an additional building with two pumps will become neces- sary shortly, as vacant property nearby is developed. 1 -- Adams Pump Station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - Replacement of two engines will be needed when storm drain capacity lead- ing to the station is improved; presently inadequate storm drains are causing street flooding within the tracts sur- rounding the station. i (II-8) 1 1 KatzHollis 1 -- Yorktown Pump Station, 9221 Yorktown - Replacement of one pump and engine is needed because the station is under capacity. ' -- Atlanta Pump Station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue - Addition of a sump pump in the south building is currently needed. 1 (4) Storm Drain Deficiencies The City's Master Plan of Drainage describes two types of storm drain facilities and their standards: master planned and local. Storm drains 390 or larger are considered master-planned facilities, with the City responsible for design and construction. Storm drains less than ' 390 in diameter are considered local facilities and are the responsibil- ity of private developers and property owners. Developers who provide master planned facilities may be reimbursed by the City. Since it is economically infeasible for the City to design all local drainage facil- ities to accommodate run-off from a 100-year storm (the minimum criteria for flood safety set by the Federal Insurance Administration) dwelling ' units can be elevated so that the lower level of the structure is above the level of flooding expected during a 100-year storm. The City reviews the grading plans of new subdivisions and other large developments to ensure that the units are elevated above the level of a 100-year storm. 1 In general, the City's Public Works Department designs new drain- age facilities so that during a ten-year storm at least one lane of travel in both directions is open on all City arterials, and flood wa- ters do not exceed the top of the curb on local streets. In •sump• or low areas where water naturally collects, new drainage facilities are 1 designed to accommodate a 25-year storm. Storm drain deficiencies, defined as the inability of a drain to convey the amount of run-off necessary to meet the City's flood protec- tion standards discussed above for 10- and 25-year storms were identi- fied in the 1979 drainage study conducted by L. D. Ring Engineering, Inc. The following storm drain improvements would correct deficiencies in the Project Area and have been included in the City's Capital Im- provements Program for Fiscal Years 1988-89. The location of these improvements is depicted in Map 5. 1 -- at the Adams pump station, a 60-inch storm drain to paral- lel the existing pipe from the pump station to Bushard ' Street in Adams Avenue because the existing 60-inch pipe can convey only 50% of the design discharge (Drainage Dis- trict 7B) 1 -- at the Banning pump station, a 54-inch storm drain in Ban- ning Avenue and a 42-inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to parallel the existing pipes because the existing pipes can 1 convey about 50% of the design discharge (Drainage Dis- trict 7C) 1 (II-9) ' aas 4HANNEL nun" EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1 CHANNEL D05 ma HARPER 1 r-- yY RKTOWN P.S. CHANNEL �• 1 I � r ---M OUNDER P. �� ; j 1 i' 1 1 4DAMS' ' IP.S. 1 I I 1 1 � r ADAMS �.S. TA�BERT ' INDIANAPOLIS P'.S.' CHAANNEL 1 OZ a NOWNAMN 'NAATLANTA P S. HUNT NGTON BEACH MEREDITH P.S.i CHANNEL D01 s I i 1 _ 1 ------ 1 �uwti► I HAMILTON NEWLAND P.S. P.Sr BANNING P.S. I 1 ' SANTA ANA ' RIVER E01 � i 1 DEFICIENT STORM DRAINS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT DEFICIENT STORM DRAINS SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE,CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM,FY 1984-1989 KatzHollis TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 5 ' REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KatzHolfis -- in the vicinity of the Atlanta pump station, a network of drains including a 30-inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1 1600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/Delaware and Elmira/Delaware . area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach Bou- levard to correct the deficiency of missing drains (Drain- age District 8B) -- at the Indianapolis Pump station, a 54-inch storm drain to parallel the existing storm drain from the pump station to Bushard Street (Drainage District 7F) -- in the vicinity of the Fountain Valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains includ- ing an 84-inch storm drain to parallel the existing 84-inch storm drain from the channel to Brookhurst Street where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2000 feet then branches north and south with 24-inch storm drains. iThe Community Facilities element of the General Plan discusses the fact that these drainage deficiencies have typically resulted from rapid urbanization and changing design standards. As an area develops, drainage facilities should be installed so that there is adequate capacity at ultimate build-out. However, many storm drains in Huntington Beach were designed for the runoff volumes predicted by formulas and criteria which reflected the state of the art at that time. The City and sur- rounding drainage areas urbanized more extensively than anticipated by County and City agencies, 'and the paved urban surfaces created larger ' run-off volumes than originally predicted. In 1973, the Orange County Flood Control District published a revised Hydrology Manual, to reflect the higher rainfall run-off conditions, but many of the City's storm drains were installed prior to the revised standards. (5) Drainage System Improvements Planned or Under Construction The Orange County Flood Control District has two drainage system improvement projects underway in the Project Area: widening and con- crete lining of the Fountain Valley (DO5) channel (Plate 12) and con- struction of a pumping station and creation of a retarding basin at Bartlett Park (Plate 13, bottom) . Improvements- to the Fountain Valley Channel (Channel DO5) now under construction include: 1) replacing the existing earthern channel from Garfield Avenue south and west to the Talbert Channel with a rec- tangular reinforced concrete channel of walls from nine to ten feet high and a channel bottom width of 50 to 65 feet; 2) constructing a conflu- ence with the Talbert Channel; and 3) increasing the size of the Bushard ' Street culvert. The sum of $3.4 million was appropriated from the Fiscal (II-10) KatzHollis Year 1983-84 budget for this construction, which should -be completed in a few months. The project was undertaken because the channel levees were- subject to 'overtopping.' Annual repairs of drainage to the levees from storm related erosion became necessary. The amount of water that escapes by overtopping is said to be not necessarily great enough to ' cause a serious problem by itself. But with sufficient duration and severity, portions of the earthern levee could erode away and allow the channel waters to leave the channel, as occurred during the storm of March, 1983 (see Plates 2 and 3) . When staff of the Orange County Environmental Management Agency submitted their report to the Orange County Board of Supervisors seeking approval of the plans and authorization to solicit bids on the project, the report noted: 'The concrete improvements will increase flood .protec- tion by the prevention of levee failures; however, the designed capacity cannot be achieved until major downstream improvements are constructed. Local flooding, caused by water before it reaches the channel may occur until additional local drainage improvements are constructed by the City [of Huntington Beach) .' The Flood Control District's current budget also includes $2 mil- lion for the construction of a pumping station to the north of Adams Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard, just to the north of the County- owned pumping station on Adams (Plate 13, top) . In addition, the unde- veloped area known as Bartlett Park, which currently functions as a natural retarding basin, would be surrounded by an earthern levee to increase its capacity for holding t lood water. No excavation will be necessary for this improvement. The project is now in the design stage ' and a contract for construction should be awarded by June 30, 1985. (6) Drainage System Improvements Under Consideration Earlier this year, the Orange County Flood Control District con- tracted with the engineering firm of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates to prepare a project report and environmental impact report (EIR) on upgrading the system of flood control channels known as the Talbert Valley channels. The Talbert Valley channels .are comprised of the Huntington Beach, Talbert and Fountain Valley channels (DO1, DO2, and DO5) . The northeast portion is in the City of Fountain Valley. They were constructed to accommodate about 65% of a 25-year storm (or less than a ten-year storm) . The purpose of the project is to upgrade the channels to 100-year storm capacity, the contemporary design stan- dard. Correcting the channel deficiencies to accomodate the waters of 100-year storms, without improvements to the Santa Ana River capacity, will not necessarily prevent the occurrence of a 100-year flood. Drafts of the Bein/Frost report have discussed seven alternative ' projects, which include various sites for retarding basins as well as (II-11) 1 Katz Holl is different combinations of lined and unlined channels. Retarding basins and partially lined, rather than all rectangular concrete lined channels have been proposed for cost effectiveness. Several alternatives consi- der relocation of the ocean outlet to approximately 2,000 feet northwest of its present location. ' Two decisions are critical to the selection of one of the alter- natives and the definition of the final design: the choice of retarding basin sites and the location of the ocean outlet. The width and confi- guration of the channels is particularly dependent on the location and capacity of the retarding basins. The various sites of the retarding basins are exhibited in Map 6. It is difficult to project when a final decision on an alternative may be made; there are indications of poten- tial controversy concerning the relocation of the ocean outlet. The final Bein/Frost project report is expected to be completed in October, 1984 with 'circulation of the draft EIR starting then also. Construction of the project can be undertaken in phases. Even with full construction of the project, technically the flood plain established in the Flood Insurance Rate Map would not change, because the Santa Ana River would remain a significant flood threat to the Project Area. ' For nearly twenty years, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has studied the need for improvements, known as the Main Stem Project, that would enable the Santa Ana River to accommodate flood waters in excess of a 100-year storm. Within the City of Huntington Beach, the project would involve ' widening the mouth of the Santa Ana River and relocating the southern- most end of the Talbert (DO2) channel. Congress is_ currently consider- ing authorization of the project, and if budget appropriations are ' forthcoming, design studies would get underway next year. The Corps is also seeking authorization of an, •Interim Three Project• to gather data on local drainage systems, such as that of Huntington Beach that feed into the Main Stem Project. If approved, these studies would begin in 1989 and would contribute to implementation of the Main Stem Project. B. Existing Social Conditions The estimated population of the Project Area is 27,835 persons residing in 8,590 housing units, according to the 1980 U.S. Census. Traditional indices of social conditions in redevelopment project areas such as population characteristics, income levels, employment and unem- ployment, crime rates, etc. do not have a bearing on the main cause of blight in the Project Area. ' (II-12) �r it r r r rr �r �r rr rF �r r�l it �r rr Ir rl rr. r r a I , .. -.•� ••�-. a: y;.;i•�. ..• -< tr. ;q;,a a �' rl!q t • 1 - •�_ 611:i « A i i r i ..L:4 A ' �I O D •ILML' ,a..'i. ,,. I +'�'. •'.!TL 3 ,I �'•�w .,.• ..•� •1 or ±I W ® a•M yrp Would to., HUNTINO.ON BEACH CHANNEL 10011 "C� t So 0 m , ; 1'i I �. / 49b:: +- _ hr,•T each 4 ,t ' •4, !�s / p �F m '• # i ♦.�+LMM I..R.I I ..,' ��- jw a •� '•a..+�.., 0 �. Li ,=t OO ` CA Dnt� 9 viz m w -mp�Z1. ..J 1� ' ..�; r` I IFb ii Ham ~ � -•••-� IT! ,,•'// o. o� ate» , • ",.��.'� �i• r izz.. .:� 7 v...1C. J'.' ,; c�� t � .►-�'_-j r / ~� �. '•ram. L J �•• �i . 10. i •' ! / T� .TALBERT_ CHANNEL (0021, s Was. • • m Reach 8 ' �.9sach 7 - + Reach 8•:•. F" iE Z O y-Mz v;:�.Yw }�. „ ' ��.. — �• _, ,a' N.mt `�Dft1 C0.4 ltri•� _� t `t G1 • 1 ■ y Reach- z �� - ..w•,... rn C) �" Fil t 1' i t .r �` ._ I -,-r+j� I'�• b,�• !! ' 'M Z '10 w ,< ii` D �' OO `- ! � '..� �n_ � IlI; �, ! .'1_. � 0 PITH.—`wp ; � "'2 �Zd'ai Z fM . ;. h . . 1. < ; / t • ,;r; i , �.! �'i*•• �.,� H..tI '"t FOUNTAINS rY tt ll •w y�I 9 M JGI •) a - �, + •�• �• �i� �.•'• I i .. a. •' 1 >�IIy._• i - :1 . �;Ilet0 CHANNEL- m",t •"' �I• is �' f.. � �+ r • i III -r M _ �y ._.. ., �, �•�-.�y�'i.• ^ ���i:��'t.� . . 1 I I . Dr �� . s.. :: 1 KatZHollis C. Existing Economic Conditions The analysis of land uses presented earlier describes the amount of land in the project area devoted to commercial and industrial uses. Discussions with brokers of residential real estate within the Project Area indicate that some prospective home buyers have expressed reluctance about purchasing homes in the areas that experienced severe flooding in the March, 1983 storm. ' (II-13) r r rr rr r r r rr r rr r r r r r rr r r r Pei �� tea IN}`S+�mas, r5•�,4n:;: p��„ 'ys,:s.• ��� �+���a� xJ'g �y � �&� n Q^` r i r, '�:; Ost I,•µ n$ `1 �' BEACH8Lvo ,: •g I a �R $ C t , IYr r1�r ,I,�� s� �� 4 i ' ��, t..•: � v � �t 3�j F .�� 3t i5+ � S t�• y 1,r. •, 03 1e,�f ' � :�'fil� TF�S, a����Q� �1R�" � , MAGNOLIA :�5 rr ,En° a"��, „f +qQ�, 7lsm� o. T � r : u:a ....., 1.*a'„• SiP +,V" D w; a r? +rl.F!' "h5�,�*°,R rp�1a R •Q d O rML. m ;•' 71'� lN701111YRlT, TF pj7� a� / 8B ., a . lip—air o6L acy6 .e F IL ALI F r � .�� [C � 4 r�' I '• � S$�°•f � �¢ � a ,�i R R� ,°��� •v .�w z O 'i'';+ L. i *r }L:gip,+' 3 v o f Pip� e s ,e Zr, Q 1 a n a 1 Nip1��•'" O13S �• III �py E <<`w .,•>;�. MAN Mk E Ul.. ERR 77 O• Jp y-• Y,,SIE 1 � RJl'Sl i'}'. � 4� ?r �� 1}'"x{ r �'• ' I, p R Hip 47 w a^r 9fdw. �arly J r4ta, � ti 'g: ti+n y�'.[Iy��,�n x f� `L mf�"�.•'[�� Y��pi!'tr'd g r+`+:' } '�,,i Wy� ,�M � at �. "T"(��g�h,�,9 41't�g 5 � �y Pam. + P ,�;� � �_�✓' A" '�, Q.a�J� , ,4.Yi.�f .w•,Y+�WY'y, � .. �1 TTT_ �� �t ii �` 'F!"A��,�?+Y�Y•�t, �.L�S'.4 � '� � ��` `T { #, � I. gM� k �� � � i,yy Y,,�gp a..Yn�9�nr.':t„*m,,,w°AMA9�"r" rr*w.a; . .• "w. y., i��l' A+ I Mobile home park south of Garfield, west of Brookhurst, adjacent to Fountain Valley Channel (1305), March 1983 storm. Katz Hol f 1s TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLATE 2 _ a� -''Win. }.'. �-._ z•� i,�Jam' `;`� �. `�' `♦ _• �\�\ '� - � �� !'a -. -._•�rYr �� Ate..:-cam' � �_ -`., ,i r d�1 Jar i �+, `'T'�t Jt C�:� •�'_: e' .l` �r��'' '•�til'� RT GAP FLOOD • • REDEVELOPMENT • .,rw. .• IF,,:� a, :..© �.• :r, '��„� to- � � �' . tt•,Abp iE p X� ,:8 '4 ., '. d 3s 'X s w: p 'U t • � � . � e ° Y i w ^,z �,C3' .,r i b �,� u., '.ern�P �Y '`rd�s, gy�pp,, �i n �'� rn t ,fir* "u n• r � 4. Y • �'". •,,,,r� m �5 p� all r h s v al' • hl, .m., '"l"1YgMy�W��p+TfKrN•�'1'§4'Y�, y '�.. i O a' p,� i' 4. �i ?s �;.. ', '` i:' a ..,..,e•+...-. 00 W. �,: •'40 ;N c {;h ray'5a� l3'": .t+,�fer4 .. �.� mw ,•:� �:Y nay, sY sw� !.�• a:'y r `6.»•.,Y • 's i. ,� •�,� �.r "� •�rs„ r:'#,"y �.e,,•�F.. -�9 r -u th'C'�n1 .'x,'�•:�, � t. .t,e'Y 't�''� .s �t �t> Q C } Y ai :, ',.,.. r'", f ''qY;»7 i f p 7 * }7 SM""' 3, k•�.. ? a s r d 8 y ' :., t tt,F}/ "f � �. °„� �� ;,I� d�+ sir(so .. , r.� �� ».,: ,, •�,'�a h � „ a `• 8 View of area west of Huntington Beach Channel (D01), north of Atlanta, south of Indianapolis, east of Beach, March 1983 storm. Ka9z Hop I flS TA LBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT OJEECT PLATE 4 1 1 . f� - y Intersection of Beach Boulevard and Mermaid Circle, March 1983 storm. Y 1 M t Office building on Beach, south of Sunset Circle, March 1983 storm. KatzHollis TAREDEVELOPM N FLOOD T PROJECTCONTROL PLATE 5 1 . r� r r r r rr r � r r r r r rr r it r r rr +7 all l�rY.� C �7 x'F} � I r a Y !f T <✓ Y �"b � � J v} ' kiy i1 txMttr ; I T i4` Iwo+yf�m+y�+�4U,VM`p gut '. — ii,th rf rj4. + SymV' Ir,:x WRI ; �•�p�td+s� rwy z�r �4 rtm+C yy 1 ,t tl rz WSy7 ''4! �t T', .a`y, d,�1^'r� r,+,^',Yl:.S.L�.r r 1 31l, 1 p '+ t•�4� ry, . � _'`1. , " "r"^„ry .`s:,w.. 5�t4Wo riq p k IS ....... ... 4 i -P! Pv- View of Huntington Beach Channel (1301), north of Indianapolis, March 1983 storm. Katz Hol l iS TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLATE 6 � + �i'6�1�`,�• ;t�f''i''� �,^}S:�i �#• �1d' ( :C,`n"r;`y.,°�j' ''�+'�,c. 'd1, LU ...._ ^•� ° ' ,�7 Nrr�4� I!¢f i�'il�� 'Fi d�.' " P�) TwF�.`{f'fi itP}YF�' � +t. �Lgl EVl�yl�V,, W 00 + � ��� �dSit ��5 � pj�d�`t• � gg 4 h4 r.l�!`""�Pd`d_ys�.�'ly�►��'4'Rt� . M 00 q ,Crd�ft 1 O O O Z ++ ' ' ,b e �54� �p/,yiy ,I• �, 9� eta,�' r 7��•yi� 1§'f .,�' i N LU co G CL ti'' 1,'�� ` ti` � ; '�'a' Ie --� ►'Ail; t ;'�' ''''t,4, `' W W L p Ffi {1� " Q L� � �.. (, `i 1 �. t �°a , tl l# pi •r !PI � �i +t ,41i i, a��`�, z O too �M 1 i I� *Moo CITY OWNED PUMPING Y n ' STATIONS e r ,Adams Pumping Station 19961 Chesapeake Lane _tom { Yorktown Pumping Station 9211 Yorktown Avenue j.ti=• yFr' b !y: x Banning Pumping Station 22011 Malibu Lane KatzHollis TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 8 ' REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OWNED PUMPING \ ..� STATIONS J I Newland Pumping Station j 8012 Hamilton Avenue 10, J Atlanta Pumping Station 8151 Atlanta Avenue AS AmAw-m- jiJ 1 1 Indianapolis Pumping Station 9221 Indianapolis Avenue KatZHOIIIS TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 9 ' REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT o g -. � F� �'rT+r C J Y°�`a�M�,x'�i�`9���II � rx�� a.�y '� uv + �,�.• y q r� T � r � t rya 1 r i :,� ��'* I ti`r.` i r°�q y�iR I �""q ',•s a {�'TT���.0� �+�'�'>ti }I 1't�., F n r 3,ii,�' ,r:. � f S y�e'i r3§��( d 1"y�•fY�l�4'�.wuy:'�r�l � ""q ,.� ' 1 v � i ul yh�r lI}Vlf.1 �t' i P r y{a y r 5 R�inl ;r �1 r tt�� ^ � rG � �.4• f�/�'.y9� f r'�L P'��?:i� y r „7 +1 3'•rn,r 1:,✓ rr.r y i.., Y !� �T'-�rr +p�r� !",�r�.iy"1�.�� ,� S.I.rq '•f a. "t_g�� i'' F 1 V�' '�' �' 1f1 � 1x •'N Wb�. y Y• ?-7�tv{;fin• t� � r � r n�Ay 1' ' � �'r��`a+r i. r e T ' a���i� S 1\. ,,�Fy; .1•�j'�' ��Li y�,�a��L,ri �' 4� �,lJ� Y : `� �s S.. � '+r ..a,�4•r sa T ;r.X,�.) .. �E �I'a � Ia ia.rt' t��•' t. /. x V '�� �•'6 r r'e x .'�`.�sy i •4 {' � 1 Sri*. 1 y. �'��d Y-•x",_tr � � j 1n• ,s 1,,�4 Su aqi i '�',,,�Lr, t fr�a N�*.'aiFB'!�•R I �{ 1�,fKtlr i'� ���#,� qr k?�+ r 1 >a,t 1 r'�SS"�,°.'�? r 4s1� �'"n` °..�;I�'�1"��y53 `5b��µiy,�.w`r''r�, Y r' al •4t�`rd `�t :. y�. t}6r.!atkd s r it Sr r dt t Y h,, i at�y#�J*•�r° 4 k kq^�i!r fk�C r� y air 4.r4 i� FP^''S�'rt '+ t P YY,,'' Y� 1✓✓�� ii '¢{r,w6Y1?'1, li x{1L.� .�7:A R r Y"F § f �, S'a.wf i� a �K'• .` r. � xkh�M ask q s��i 1. a �✓; ' f,W fv'1,�R I r11 AM1 lY I � 'v# Iw�rr 74f, ahP �h�Z"�r1 CRr lr dry r' .{ E r P i r ` n 4 l ir.l 'r .. 'CVr{ia lira ,:d1 u a;ill h w iy r 'rl-T'h17>w✓ A, �,flIay C1 ib«�r Fµr,✓'6i4ii I' �r SrA.ICr / 'h T, d�{i r+��YtN{� 'Si sPc�ty' ,�i�q.tl�trti�(°3• d�41 tF r• ��••�✓f ..r U,+q�,, x r 1 4y.+S'4 �+y�`�' r��j'� .art���'' n x + '` O 1.t rr>'"f 1 Y !r G w yy kS•ir"� r� .� a ,•,i; ,; Q [T� �a�rd P i `•'r'•Y"ss � b�yjil}9r T �} ,P ••S r,� ar s i�' V � xN b"'�fi'rr•"t"1'�ds i�. n! 1' �k a1 k ? a r� —•�!✓ t + C 9�''•• xi4 itiY G' K LU W Y r� W Lry n o- r s x �Nie Fnre� i O O Z Z�M r' I�r 'l!i I r �w�� S>+"i'✓t�P'tr'�. I I grcrV'yJ'�`Jhllry•°r7�, 1 S V �i .,I q I{'r r r ,'r+n ��a s %'M,•'rti'4',I'4'�i9 4k J ',. Ir I rI 17 Q kPlt° ✓Rr IrMIR�xy T'����}•" wfYr' �s1R°qr wll s rl r "': le} Y•r 1 Q = rr phr rl k 1 P..... M1 `w w fYa Y 1'q�C r. ,r ik n r w....... • r aY F � "L+ >^awr f irfal � � � 6 #, 1 O =1 �rnrh.3Vk.s 4 i xS:S rs3` F r ys a sG.n .,y. wr 1 t.'^iC5 I dy La y Y•t 1` 5 Ft t r y r r Q 1 Y+y'>• it',E u Y�1 R '� 'S' 4 xF K;tMS�r!`yr�"x4A L� •` ¢r"rr,'r#`5't 1�, S'j I.I!I 1• l;l LL. G m 1 Iw���,I"3,r�"°rs�.Fr Yi'�Iy i,q 'Cr 1 � ���� 't �hl`Ir.�y�'�r I r �•� h ,a r ?i. ri Y� a ii II r t'ri'#id1i O y,lr ar j."irST7rk'f q :IS t G �r r ,J� i"5 S,..�nr�M, "I � dd #�w w r ✓' '' .i}. � I• .�R I (� �..� I�Irq'�� d IY.r�Cr t'jdf Ir P :�r"•rrt F #rr � 'M �•la 4 r I f hh r W ♦♦��11 a�hI aw I r I�r frlr Fw ' q;r yd I �' Rd Opt is I rr r r II' o a "+ Iwnl r +1w r lfx °r rxr. �wrl'6"�iurHtrU " ' INry: S I�j � ,,, I Z I Rat #r:i F h}I I r " Y` r i ita"Pr"C p1 {�', r p� �+• I �4"rhr r�rr?a� >IPu u�,s r.. •, � � � W ydr4F`r t'F& J 1 r }rL7 j �'' r N PES Y t t S r o xxL'a /y� Lu ZW } Y 7 f k Yo ! st IIt�S u o }h y w f•r a Ffi.r<} I :' r'r W J � a r tr�i�} v. a�YP ,�'i rkr d�4t ,�{> ♦ r� rrt.�'�1"!ri +, F t r� k i4 t'L•! 5� fi sr I d�� i� �r y}y�,y�p,,Sti r�pr r a' ' ti'y} ; r ��`• y�` r t.s S': rhi tr lrr k .�t Fr �y,�fY v� P+Fi s�lr ri,Jlr�:. M P �h . ly��^P7� *4 S# X f d i t A s �1 j�'4 ',�^a m�I hr•� iwt rl I R' I i a1/ r1rC4'"1 rd*ry�9•'ItR�rr�a✓':Y f y1 :;<r y^a�4r�� �, IY�Pr ,,�r+�r f �, r t a rirr a�� �.k�r, r k6 i�,rt aF{h�II r tR n'� yRi fY 1s hi3r r" ti� f ��h"r'rl kl I'wr 'I I kt1 4 i�°�?r1'a.II gTYI }Sr r.�r t r �"lrty Ifrr rlC r hrk J rt+fy'�d,f. err r p iq t�1 r �r 1r I:s p Yx 'r I #I•ry#CI •�A h �, � t � +cdt xR��'L, r,ir t qi U'.. 4i ;. �M ;�i�k�p�is+t,�FY�f r 1>�r�a +aA�.a� u aA�Wi�I S".ffS'yu°`'�C+ �•' rcyfC '`� � y,. a .r• s.. +.}MY, 4 �'� r, aA�, a�ty�1.. {rP u'' 'a� ,. ....r Fxt f t a f• O <w, �,t••s``f!'rk,,S,tif�.5 }' * v 'l r''?�• r F �,a) r r✓J 1f >� p �� w v `si>' 'rwa7� w'�k `? �Fj r ,�3+ N"�' 2 r ,7 4 MroX 'y'*v,o � �' !!#i,�q�is� ri•.y !Ir J � r � "k` ,,r r silawr,n ra. vx•? >�; YF r pM�1.ar,,.;1F�le r rf,� l ,#y y�,�u,a �`Cbti�y'v'i;pPr's�aF"f��r':ch Tf n('r+fkf ifs y �rf { F•'L{'v1" a14f tlr SJ'1��Fr�f�kJ4,I ui#d1 rS`'`a E", i.r r� il. J.�la� r,. .. �n.,� F"rG`C4d 1�1� ��!� !itrr s�t kr Yi Taw rti,.a.' � I�:. P.f�. , Y '���r�r"�'r'yh�r{r�r I r rd M..flq�k .. ,..# • i •r N 'r+, ''�� .�':,.• <>.Ca,. �. I' a ,! .■r �. r rw� w � w� r�rt w w w ■ram .� w � �• w w w ij i ft r: .� ,.. -tau•-�•I^*•. — s - _ /}�®-" _.;-T-� —• ' � ��F'' �� .s ��� � t ? "'..fir-'.�r� ��•�s ' _•.✓ ' ' • N • r "+-t � t� r, ��� r• �, rf �Y ( f • jA�•1 �tFr' ray, ti o r,I 4.' '�• a, f1 � r4.r.r,. ��Qp `'�, }�? ..'Ly h +'.�',t��!•1. +� "�u`°d,d``r,#4 `��l��i�• .tit `�r i r{,', '7t:, J +�"qt 4st +ap 'a+. '. ."r ,,l�• u Q ��i' r ew ar���f y' � �2 Y ,,,b} ?. F �i iy,iw•Ys���,,� �!Jr. 1v' r;. J � ' t� ,, rY���,�,`r�'dj� ei•F• '� i 4 4�ti�y�r �4'it���+A�.� !., �' �: ° _ 4 h �thNy. ., f ;5' to nt r , �/ p`{`},}• < , �y�LU W S � �` i` e °!FN {{ui %'y �, ^G rr^I �t 7 00 V at Q (/o ;',�r-.. '1,. ^' rJ� i ,f6F N'S •/' I n� fry 1 i•: [7�,'f'u f%y' 1 �'' S'�x ia"�;i;!'�,'!w�w r'. O O :, // � R.�•••a " t��;�'h dl ��.:� '.'"� c�}• t Mr C+rti�yrr 1. � 4`+S"�3.. � . i Ur ', r /t.ry. ~"sqt t^ �2�c6..f�r �' t�'7Y �t� '!�• irK'aa l,y�r ��{ J,��diS•3�f ( y.. .J i, y.. �! Z ! .! ,tii9( VS 1• ! S�,$�JSr?, ry y;r.h r.7 F r f { ,�y�,5. O Z T. T• 2 4r fir,Nk'rr t ^+ff`��+ t I F!•�•'r g r r _ Mr r r 3' t {y A t .�48 tP4 _r '" r CW Q W 4.T t" j ! t t . ¢ ✓n t ��r " 'n, 3 .l _/ tt J C F— � ... � �•,.' ;{� T� .•`vi. �' �� ! �{r' •[ {5x f + � .4 ••"�t �.' v r ,.; rtx�! 'i"�1 r 1 , a' n•rt \ s 't q'Vyqt, 7t. �,i r i r. Z .r�li ..ty.,' M1 t ,• ;�.• ;fit ^ �'•E 2, ,.Y. y;'4' � n,! J i4 ��•r�7yC'.. �I }J 'vyy:iS= �,.r a ii f' .•�. � ,.i\�"✓ � (k' +cL.r�,/*3rf. ,tfa 1 S ' � 6} r.':.i� '�`{( �7<' �.i O } •v, '�1`: \:� yr. �� •ray� lLi,�•rt'Si--4 T �cc rtE^4 ; 4 qr* { } � iirh;.,�� f r yld:vrpttFy `t. �1} F� .$.4`�ar.rr 40 ' ^^ r l'. V{,khj df1 r+ 3u,,r4 r rrT .5. I f �•r a, fy r O J 41, O r 1,..+.}1 y:. $_���t r y 4 ,`} a r i I��! I �4k i":, t" t• ' 4!! X' Z�,;,.. :t�},,:� •�X �"t' rY' r`�r��,�� • �y !P �s w"�.. f 1 r�,tia�+ "xtl. L ` Jr`"1!,,{ V Co W , ,1M :fin: ,,,�y�r i ley{� `,r r�tMWia� 1 >•t 'r ICI�,y` � "y, !' r/�. LF. W z jr, y`•'S it ,'' gqt!yy s.' r�'i•2 `: .et"�"'#pcc',,.� ` �rl {'fv+ 'v`/14t }eK�a ., y �, ya 4,' { y 8 4},re �; ui W Al W W U f M ,� ^ 1^ N�, '� 1i W I ,: tr ., F� r 1 �, } I O l 1 a�'` ` �t.4 `�4 }ry k x r�i�c+ i 1 I F 9 tt ,�' P- ti CL yj: �t' ! � a ��vwft y '.�.��'� •§w� r�"w ���,�I���� u ri' ^�{4 �r�}k1��� f c j j Ili f 7 r"Ri _ - �� .r• r; r -.,,.s3 �-g3.•�ncr���..� ":. ,e a4.vm•fir, r fAf �, --. +` -y•: 'lY.��h'fr��,i't� r, � A •w+ a14 7./�, •��8 a,.. .,:� �� t _ .fir h ,l�li � y��'� ��S7ekjR•. !-. -i.'��4t�. t�i', t � '�t i ,f �`i�*4'{ t�,r' } °,E* x �. 1"'-• ram. '��,.3��'� t t, •S, `k_.�e�.s 3�,,` •-�✓ .t�i�it tqr s, ti g'" r h. -�'4"•E f£_.,� � � ."^x �� tt Y�Zs,lti'•'4 .�^+_Yr�,,.�`�� ��z*.:�-t z t-'��1'{i-* :F l�j�„�4�„�'i +.y� Gi a� ••� -' . :, p, T•,�t�.1� W"t'�a..!"t'' i V'�•ti � 1�,. '•E'�fx ',` °rr fir. y� � a, S�+f'. "i7 "� ����%"-���� �. .a t 31. i �.�:•ryi t � y,t r^h" V�` If,V. ,t r1•+•t' .ty, .sty \ `. lfkf,Y �.+4. {b•'�,y��C.n- t,'r ="" �,'v'f rr t'�'�` r�z.`i.tv`F .,1 ,{4y`s� � �+'f �Ta�`ir .r�G��yhS.)-i � } � �� TALBERT GAP "r„i;':r-u-n} tt {t b''��� Phj" .QL�Xy°,4`.yrl�.��,�'�.'r�ts��'s�'ar.s��,.Y� ..r"^�t 6d '\ •�r`t���/�+-_X'i< < 'Jl+�• y� '�`,+,.�i<",Q�,rA,?-�. �.r-tya"`�� 4'•�y.�'"`F °_N pLy��:N"'�"�{�1• r,. z �°�' +}�!`b'° � ��}�ci� ���y,,D `� \ �i 4�, ,. , �.:\�,,^-+-'i`5�x����F - �1�`�i.� a.t����rs.+"�� �• v ;...��"! v`-�\�B'',:�1 �J�r-`+,•t�...;w\ �'""•�, 1•.' L, '�. FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENTKatzHollis • • KatzHollis ' PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA A. General Financing Methods Available to Agency The proposed Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to finance the Project with financial assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, special assess- ment districts, property tax increments, interest revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, the lease of Agency- owned property, the sale of Agency owned property, or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. In addition, the . City may supply advances and expend money as necessary to assist the Agency in carrying out the Project. Such as- sistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City and the Agency. B. Tax Increment Financing Method In 1952, the voters of California approved an amendment to the ' State Constitution which authorized a unique method of financing the public costs associated with redevelopment. Based on this amendment, the California Legislature provided specific statutory authority in the Community Redevelopment Law allowing local redevelopment agencies to use tax increment or tax allocation financing within formally designated redevelopment project areas. This method has since become the model ' used by many other states. The basic theory underlying tax increment financing is that re- development projects should pay for themselves. To bring this about, the Community Redevelopment Law provides that when a redevelopment plan for a project area is adopted, the total current taxable value of all taxable property within the area is determined. (The current value is the value on the assessment rolls last equalized prior to the date that the redevelopment plan is adopted. The last equalized roll is called the •base year roll,• and the total taxable value of the taxable prop- erty within the project area shown on that roll is the "base year value.") After the base year value is determined, all taxing agencies who had been previously receiving taxes continue to annually receive the taxes produced from the base year assessment roll. Any taxes which are produced from increases in taxable value in the project area above the base year value, however, are annually allocated to the redevelopment agency to pay the costs. it has incurred in carrying out redevelopment activities in the project area. ' (III-1) 1 Katz Hol l is ' Increases in taxable value within redevelopment project areas may occur in the same manner and for the same reasons as increases in other 1 areas. They may be due to routine annual reassessments (limited to a maximum increase of two percent by Proposition 13) ; they may arise from reassessments following changes in property ownership; or they may be occasioned by assessments of new developments being completed and placed on the assessment rolls. The Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area is currently 94 pecent built out. Only a marginal amount ' of development and very little redevelopment of Project Area properties is expected to occur over the 20-year term of the Redevelopment Plan. As a result, future increases in Project Area taxable value will be gen- erated primarily from routine annual reassessments, and reassessments due to property ownership changes. To finance redevelopment activities, a redevelopment agency may ' incur project costs directly, or it may borrow money, issue bonds or enter into agreements to incur debt. Regardless of the method used to incur the debt, so long as such debt exists (and providing the agency has requested payment in the manner prescribed by law) , the agency will annually receive the tax increment produced by the* project area. When all loans, bonds, advances and other debts of the agency have been re- tired - or in any year when no such debts have been incurred or carried ' over from previous years - then the tax increment funds are allocated to the county and other project area taxing agencies in the same manner as taxes produced by the base roll. Assuming there is taxable value above the base year value, and that the redevelopment agency has incurred project debts, tax increment ' revenues are payable to that agency during the first fiscal year which begins after January 1st following adoption of the project redevelopment plan. Thus, if a plan is adopted in 1984 and is effective prior to January 1, 1985, the agency would be able to claim tax increments from the project area (if any are generated) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1985. If the redevelopment plan is not adopted or effective until after January 1, 1985, the agency could not collect tax increments until the fiscal year which commenced on July 1, 1986. After project area values have increased sufficiently to create a ' moderate or higher annual tax increment "flow,• an agency may borrow against the future payment of such increment by issuing bonds or tax anticipation notes, and may fund interest as a part of such borrowing. Realistically, substantial increases in taxable value would have to oc- cur in the project area before the agency could utilize proceeds of tax allocation bonds. Other factors which would bear upon a potential bond issue include the current market interest rate, the need to provide as- sured increment flow in excess of projected annual debt service needs, the requirement to set aside up to 20 percent of all tax increment funds for low and moderate income housing purposes, and the provisions and re- (III-2) i KatzHollis q uirements contained in any fiscal detriment alleviation agreements the agency may have entered into with affected taxing agencies. Until such ' time as sufficient tax increment funds are assured for bond purposes, an agency would have to rely on loans or advances from the City, loans from other sources, or proceed on a 'pay-as-you-go• basis from each year's ' annual tax increment allocation. C. Estimated Project Costs ' The primary purpose of the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelop- ment Project is to protect a portion of the City by eliminating the conditions of blight in the Project Area as evidenced by the condi- tions described in Part II of this Report to City Council, consisting chiefly of the existence of inadequate flood control public improvements and facilities. The Agency proposes to eliminate such conditions by providing, or assisting in the provisions of, some or all of the public improvements and facilities projects listed in Table III-1. The public improvements and facilities projects identified on Table III-1 have an estimated local cost of $19,768,000. This prelimi- nary cost estimate includes a 15 percent contingency and escalation ' factor. The projects are not listed in order of priority, nor is the listing, which is also set forth in the proposed Redevelopment Plan, intended to be a limitation on the Agency's authority or methods in implementing the Plan. Furthermore, because of the preliminary nature of the cost estimates, the uncertainty of other potential funding sources, and the Agency's current inability to establish firm priorities among the various projects, the listing does not assure that such proj- ects can or will be financed in whole or in part by tax increment reve- nues. ' Improvement project priorities and specific engineering and design solutions will be determined by the Agency and City Council on the basis of more detailed studies of Project Area conditions and needs and a more comprehensive examination of funding requirements and resources. These studies will be undertaken when and as other related plans and actions begin to crystalize. The Agency's ability to provide for such projects will be largely determined by the amount of tax incre- ment revenues generated by. the redevelopment process, by the availa- bility and levels of other funding sources, and by the extent to which the Orange County Flood Control District is able, through its funding mechanisms, to assist in addressing the essentially regional flood control problems affecting the Project Area. No improvement projects will be undertaken for which full funding, from whatever sources, is ' not assured. Nevertheless,- the completion of any of the proposed projects will result in a significant health and safety benefit to the Project Area and the City, irrespective of whether all such proposed projects are completed. (III-3) ' 101084 mNNMCl i KatzHollis Table III-1 ' Huntington Beach Redevelopnent Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Redeveloprent Project ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVENOTS AND FACILITIES PRU= CGSTS 1 Portion Proposed Estimated for Project Funding ' Total Cost Amount Percent SICRM DRAINS 1 Installation of additional storm drains to cor- rect deficiencies and increase capacity at the following locations: — At the Adams punp station, a 60-inch storm drain to parallel the existing pipe from the punp station to Bushard Street in Adams Avenue (Drainage District 7B) $ 344,000 $ 344,000 100% At the Banning pub station, a 54-inch storm drain in Banning Avenue and a 42- inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to parallel the existing pipes (Drainage 1 District 7C) 410,000 410,000 100% In the vicinity of the Atlanta pub sta- tion, a network of drains including a 30- inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1,600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/ 1 Delaware and Elmira/belaware area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach 1 — Boulevard (Drainage District 8B) 1,255,000 1,255,000 100% At the Indianapolis punp station, a 54- inch storm drain to parallel the existing ' storm drain from the puttp station to Bushard Street (Drainage District 7F) 406,000 406,000 100% 1 — In the vicinity of the Fountain Valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains includ- ing an 84-inch storm drain from the chan- nel to Brookhurst Street where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2,000 feet then branches north and south with 24- 1 inch storm drains (Drainage District ) 1,227,000 1,227,000 100% Subtotal - Storm Drains $3,642,000 $3,642,000 (continued on next page) 1 > 1 Katz Hol l i s Table III-1, Page 2 ' Portion Proposed Estimated for Project Funding Total Cost Amount Percent POMP STATIONS Correction of deficiencies in the following City- owned pump stations: ' — Flounder pump station, 9731 Flounder Lane major modification to pump' station and incoming line $2,000,000 $2,000,000 100% ' — Indianapolis pump station, 9221 Indiana- polis Avenue - replacement of two small ' engines and pimps with larger units 500,000 500,000 100% — Newland pump station, 8612 Hamilton Ave- nue - construct additional building with t two pumps 1,000,000 1,000,000 100% — Adams pump station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - replace two engines 500,000 500,000 100% ' — Yorktown pump station, 92U Yorktown Ave- nue - replace one pump and engine 250,000 250,000 100% ' — Atlanta pump station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue - add sump pump 3,000 3,000 100% Subtotal - Pump Stations $4,253,000 $4,253,000 ' DPAIlNhGE CHANNELS Correction of deficiencies in the systen of ' County-owned drainage channels through widening, deepening and concrete lining and including con- $28,865,000 $ 7,216,000 25% struction of one or more water retarding basins, to to ' depending upon alignment selected 37,179,000 9,295,000 25% $36,760,000 $15,111,000 41.1% ' to to Subtotal - All Projects $45,074,000 $17,190,000 38.1% $ 2,267,000 to Plus: Contingencies, Escalation (158) $ 2,57578,000 �17.378.000 ' to 2C7rAL ESTIMITED COSTS - ALL PROJECTS ffi19.768,000 ' Note: Amounts shown are estimates only and are subject to change. This listing of projects is set forth for planning purposes, and shall not be deemed a limitation on the Agen- cy's authority to implement the Redevelopment Plan. 1 . 1 Katz Hol l is ' In addition to the flood control public improvements and facili- ties project costs estimated in Table III-1, the Agency may incur annual administrative costs for staff and consultant services, and may incur other costs for Project implementation purposes as permitted by the Re- development Plan, including the setting aside of up to 20 percent of all ' tax increment funds received into a low and moderate income housing fund. Because of the limited purposes for which the Project will be undertaken - elimination of flood control problems - the Agency's esti- mated Project costs are likewise limited to only those costs related to such purposes and to the required low and moderate income housing set asides. The total estimated cost for these activities, as shown on Table III-2, is $25,200,000. D. Proposed Financing Method 1 Nominal advances for early survey and planning activities and Project administration have come and will continue to come from the City until Agency working capital from tax increments or other available ' sources is available. The Agency may agree to repay such loans and ad- vances from the City, including simple interest thereon. The Agency and City may enter into agreements under which the City would assist the Agency to provide public improvements and facilities projects, including 1 those listed in Table III-1, or to accomplish other Project purposes. Agency bonds or tax anticipation notes may be issued if needed and fea- sible to finance all or any portion of Project costs. 1 The proposed Redevelopment Plan limits the amount of tax incre- ment dollars which may be allocated to the Agency to a cumulative total 1 of $80,500,000, which includes debt service on any bonds, notes, or other indebtedness the Agency may issue or incur or interest bearing reimbursement agreements the Agency may enter into. The proposed Plan limits the principal amount of Agency bonded indebtedness which is to be repaid in whole or in part from tax increment funds to a total of $25,200,000 outstanding at any one time. 1 The Agency recognizes that the estimated. cost of the proposed flood control public improvements and facilities projects shown on Table III-1 and total Project costs shown on Table III-2 exceed the amount of ' tax increment revenues likely to be generated from the Project Area. Tax increment revenues are therefore considered as only one of several sources of funds which would be used by the Agency and the City is alle- viating the flooding and flood control problems existing within the Project Area. All potential revenue sources will be analyzed and used as available, including annual capital improvement appropriations from the City as well as from the Orange County Flood Control District. The 1 Agency's and City's goal is to effectively address a critical need as quickly as possible within existing funding constraints and potential funding capabilities. i 1 (III-4) ' 101084 Katz Hol l i s . mmJNMC1 ' Table III-2 ' Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS ' Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects (Table III-1, larger figure) $19,768,000 Administration (10 years at $25,000, plus 10 years at $15,000) 400,000 Subtotal $20,168,000 Plus: Low and Moderate Income Housing (20% of total below) 5,042,000 ' TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $25,210,000 Round to: $25.200,000 ' Note: The above estimated Project costs do not include amounts for pay- ments to affected taxing agencies, if any, for alleviations of fiscal detriment. 4 PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE l PUBLIC NOTICE I . PUBLIC NOTICE Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961. and �- ZONING INDEX, MAP A-24831, dated 11 June. 1963. - STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGEND 19 6I0 SECTION-TOWNSHIP.RAN,E --V111 OM 22.DISTRICT MnP 12 ' Ua'N- DMI] GM iS County of Orange Public Notice •OVerhe4n0 COVMed by MIS S"ldeal Is set ,n 7 point - ,rllh 10 pica Column width 22SII 2.�-5-„ 24.5t1 - i -DM 2D._ DM 71 DM23 DW24 OM2S I* �- DM 27 I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of !' _ the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen = 30-5-II 29 5 U 2t➢;�,:J,l 27-5•:1 26-5:11 25- 1 /OM 35 OM 34 ���OM 33 years, and not a party to or interested in the below °MSe °M3 ° I ' entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange I C, / Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the '-° 335-1 Y� 34!_-!I 355-n, 3i�9 DM j6 UM}] �../10 38 - Itiou 39- 1) 40 NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, ! -}f '' s....•. _ printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, I ��5,�4 25-0,, _ 1 11.5-II 6-6I-q 5-I6.,0 F I County of Orange, State of California, and that a ; OM4 c� OM3 t,o z o 1 of oM� ` I 1 Notice.of Joint Public Hearing 10 , � 11 �ti2r6,I -7-6-q 6.6-n 1 DM 0.( .. .., -..... .. • 2 Dµ3 M7 'UMB of which copy attached hereto is a true and completeAL �? ' copy, was printed and.published in the Costa Mesa, CITY OF . I c��2 �� 0N20 °N'y Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, HUNTINGTON BEACH: ORANGE COUNTY -CALIFORNIA Irvine, the. South Coast communities and Laguna I 24-6 a .0 (1 I '- -- — DM 29 Beach issues of said newspaper for t _ consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of 7 1 J NOTICE OF A JOINT PUB- trol District,then along said ommendation of the Plan- may filein writing with the LIC HEARING BY THE CITY Channel DO-2 to the-City ping Commission on the City Clerk a statement of hka- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF limits,then southwest along'Plan end EIR 84-5, and the objections to the.proposed October 27 198 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH AND City boundary to the south report of the County Fiscal Redevelopment Plan and THE HUNTINGTON BEACH flood control boundary.Fol- Review Committee(if any). Environmental Impact Re- REDEVELOPMENT AGEN- lowing the southern Environmental Impact bound- port. Any person or. or- 'bound-November 3 198 4 CY ON THE PROPOSED ary of the flood control chan- Report No. 84-5 which ganlzatlon desiring to be TALBERT GAP FLOOD nets(DO-2) and generating assesses the environmental.herd will be afforded an op- CONTROL REDEVELOP- plant. Again, following the impacts of the proposed portunity to be heard.At the �MENT. PLAN AND EN- southern and western hour the City within the Project Area flood control improvements VIRONMENTAL IMPACT boundaries of the flood con- Council and Redevelopment November 10 198 4 1 REPORT NO.84-5 trol channel(DO-1)to Atlan- . Agency shall proceed to to Avenue;west along Atlan- 4. All evidence and testi- hear and pass upon all writ- NOTICE IS HEREBY to to Beach Boulevard,then mony for and against the ten and oral objects to the ,GIVEN that the City Council south along' Beach adoption of the Redevelop- proposed Redevelopment November 17 4 �of the City of Huntington Boulevard to the limits of the ment Plan and certification Plan and Environmental Im- 198 1 Beach, California, and'the_residential- development; of the Environmental Impact pact Report. I Huntington Beach Re- then west to Delaware,north Report. The proposed Redevelop- j development Agency have along Delaware Street to At- At the above stated day, ment Plan, Environmental. I set Monday, November 19, lanta,and then following the hour,and place,any and all Impact Report, and related 198 1984 at 7:30 P.M.as the time bluffline until it approaches persons having any objects documents are now on file and•the City ,Council Newland north of Ellis at to the proposed Redevelop- and open for public Inspec- Chambers of the Civic Newland, south along New- ment Plan and Environmen- tion in the office of the Dlrec- Center, 2000 Main Street,'land to Atlanta, east along tal Impact Report or to the for of the Department of De- Huntington Beach, Cali- Atlanta to Magnolia, and regularity of any of the.prior velopment Services 2000 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the fornia,as the place for a joint then north along Magnolia proceedings, may appear Main Street, Huntington' public hearing to be held by Street to the City limits. ' before the Agency and the Beach, California 92648, foregoing IS true and correct. the City Council and the Re- The purpose of the joint Council and shown Cause and at the Huntington Cen- development Agency to con- public hearing is to consider: why the proposed Re- tral Library and all City II- sider the approval and adop- - development Plan should brary annexes. Owner-par- tion of the proposed Talbert 1. The Redevelopment not be adopted and the En- ticipation' rules are also Gap Flood Control Re= Plan submitted by the Agen- vironmental Impact Report available for review through Executed on _)ova mh e r 19 198 4 development. Plan and cy which proposes"as its certified., the same office and address certification of Environmen- scope and objectives to At any time not later than at City Hall. All property at Costa Me , California. tal Impact Report No.84-5. eliminate unsafe and.un- .the hour aforesaid set for owners, businesspersons, t The proposed Redevelop- sanitary conditions for the hearing,any person object- and/or tenants wishing to. ment Project Area covers existing housing stock due ing to the proposed Re- participate in the project approximately 3.44 square to flood hazard; provide development Plan and En- must submit a "Statement miles of land, and has the needed flood control im- vironmental-Impact Report of Interest to Participate" Signature following.boundaries. provements to existing fa- or to the'regularity of any of form to the Redevelopment From the northeast corner cilities, including flood con- the prior.proceedings, may Agency at the aforesaid ad- of Magnolia Street and Gar- trol channels,storm drains, appear before the Agency dress by January 28, 1985. field Avenue, :Continuing pump stations, and retard- and the Council and shown Telephone No. '(714) east along Garfield to ing basins; and encourage cause why the proposed Re- 536-5271 ' Brookhurst Street, .south participation, coordination, development Plan should 'Dated: along Brookhurst Street to and,cooperation with area not be adopted and the En-. October 26, 1984 Yorktown Avenue,then west residents, businesses, -and vironmental Impact Report By:Alicia M.Wentworth, to Bushard Street, south public agencies. certified. City Clerk, City of Hunt- along Bushah to Banning At any time not later than Ington Beech, (714) Avenue, thin east to ' 2.The report of the Agen the hour aforesaid set for 536-5227 Brookhurst, southwest cy to the City Council on the hearing, any person object- 'Published Orange Coast along Brookh,urst to the proposed Redevelopment ing to the proposed Re- Daily Pilot October 27, No- 1 vJ PROOF OF :northern bouidary of the Plan includes,but is not Lim- development Plan and En-'ember 3, 10, 17,.1984 Ci 'Orange Counli Flood Con- ited to, the report and rec- vironmental Impact Report Sa-309 t ,S _ C.1 T� (�ticJ�tl_CL L_O_�' l`i!J_rlJ_7_I nJ6 7"�nJ �c=F}C N�- ---- Fc o� c� Cv�vTir� c. �����-a�a�c�.� - -- � 1_�N�����o� 13_�Ae�, C�5ab�6__ -- - _Papa F,ry/,..a i�,.e�_. HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: ��`�2S (Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business — Residential _ Business Residential _ Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : game of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. 1 am au- ,..- . posed to the Project and : � sh to Speak t. ree minute maximum) Eo Not Wish to Speak b. 1 have not formed an opinion. regarding the project and :. — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions(s)AAnswered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED NOWIS Iers PM 'BI Vuma,�.Q�Qe�an`�¢ :toth �43� {��wn�a a,41A `?eti-�t `un. �'+-an � �-fi�n)ern{ e�a e t�-ou�cQ✓vk.Q.�� 6�0`� �.� m $ J ,pos a*J- a, T b4, �Q 50 51n o.dQewea( „u.i, AA &64amY v L* anti ,Doz o tA4 poz. a.�Q.A. N'id�l�y Fy &WA� F "'UYU AA9+ 0-0-\t� R601694 vf," 3� l2 �L�-5 ���q�y�✓�p Gy-,C}'d1.�(- GL1,2 A44�x aolkk Z�A R .7Ant ��pkane�" 2e. AsQ Lo� WA " ..ttm1.U' tok Q-iR - nU�l 9 �i WU w-?.►�,Lot1— iaovw� w0 usf aAl AA fft� " tka �'3 c" I fr {?,�� r � i � /• PSI ��! ;;/, �/� 1 �' , � 1 � 1 1 � 1 J ! ' I 1 1 i I fill ro I J tt I I t � ► it ��,� �� � . � �, ► ,d � ��� _ ,� 1 3 1 1 � � • �� rst ����P taw. � o (14 k)" J is A i o a c4et� 41, C I p 7�2 Rd 3#VLL � 7 I OVI (YY\WVVL/) �. ��� � fie. t,�►-��,�(..�. a o LA_ t6 AIAX Ulf t a &U49-4^-ook. ' � • IJwc�.u��, is, �gay vV W i4.Q. L TJFIAJ 4tr"I Alvz� dAW�A� A 660 W.tbk , IC So co to e� l� -tba , - - - AA �� � a P�� Aj- 7a&j-. t o -,J kg dA /YVvA c5K &MW"wn (7> r � J P D Ucvj? ?A& tMYV� r,AQ �ems►. �►� I , 2 3 3 aQ 2n &hIM PILA 20 6LA4 � tL &ttsll�, 2.Q Lot p A4 lvw VftA ob AA 10—�Z_�� v 41, D ,; t . 41 �� LN l� h r t` n � AAA- ,,L;o� S�,Q a n "� lJ�l' IBC r'0 • I 0-(6-z� (261 ,3 1 S- �s 74 ( S,D J n ^ d,,U AtAl e i o ` -Q UY t4 U14" S."I � 3,Z JIA AM)Q Cur-, 3,3 Q014 ALL _ aAko- WWI% uarA� 9=t �rI'A 4 PAW, r z 4u+ WITA ftl-Q- AaZ AM At- XPIA �� s� -o 3 , AA Cc)bmo iL"ofo OVA l^ o cpt '�),s,�l/•f...� , �j Q�-Y;Q, .ram-G�-(�� � . cv" 4LA- 1 IUDAuk- f 0 Rky p Lo �) c) aAvt - OD �.lh.,lX,Q,4 � ✓ti O�k uFUT-Ar:71 U-111 '' AA ' � ks- -4-c-D ......... HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Sjou-- Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS qe& w"'y4 .) ) on_ 3. PL ASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: 0(a Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: _ Business X Residential _ Business _ Residential — Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : d Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Spea (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED �� 97 HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a th �e min to maxim fo those wishing to speak) 1 NAME • G! iGLo �� � ( PleasePrint 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3 . PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : f Business ,v/Residential Business Residential Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wi—sh7to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : /Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak — Do Not Wish to Speak, but : — Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official re- o r d �� ,bwf ol�) ,d Qu d ;ilk- �, P, �'����� � o , ee/ 1n1 , C�- - ,,Lc��i �, /' LL/ o c Want t e Follo in Que ti ns )s �swered : �, , USE OTHER SIDE IF NEE D �Y JAf OL-�-t U�u0-cl- IULLI x . Gti' i ,j i 1 a f If : 0 a( I : i t 1 .I �E i s s I , E 3 I IE HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: im G d' -e J-' Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS o' 4v 11t 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential _ Other _ Other c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : 14 9 Ad I'F- (Name o rganization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : ✓Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak 6, I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS /.:2 3 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: �Representative Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative Ject Area:of Real of Tenant in Proj Property Owner in Project Area: Business ✓ Residential Business Residential _ Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization) (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum)ZA-' 1,f5_0 not Wish to Speak �a 5. I am apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak b. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak, but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • • C HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS D ® 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Rep resentati or Representative of Real of -Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of . an Or ani ationin Project Are me of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : Df Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak S. I am a osed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak. 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered :. USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: ,[�� Please P int 2. HOME ADDRESS 2��wv 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: _ Business 6� Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : — Want the Following Comment(s) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED t 6 or DO HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS �2o� 13/_ I-A& ay,A--C t key 3. KFASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative )Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: ._ Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : 'v� Q.__ Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) —Do not Wish to Speak S. I am Opposed to the Project and : K-W ish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Vrant t :e Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum . or those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME AD RESS / J& 3 . PLEASE 'IDENTIFY YOUR INT EST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : _ Business residential — Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. IAom apposed to the Project and : - Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : r Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) i . NAME: L Pleas��e�� Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS Lame.,, 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative o Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: _ Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak t ee minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak l 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : W610A ('ue- ' e14 rrrny neen Want the Following Comments ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: -.97 �_Z_"q Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 4F12G: - 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: Oa Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: — Business t esidential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representativv f an Organization in Project Area : (Name o.f Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : W i s h to (three minute maximum) � f -7-CG�12� Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Sen G (Please Print n 2. HOME ADDRESS �.Z�( jr- :Ereena.)(Gk cal r 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area : Business Residential Business Residential _ Other — Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) ZDo Not Wish to Speak 1,,2a4tZ ,X_ 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding a rr ject and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: e a s nt 2 . HOME ADDRESS ?P'•�yZ 3. PL-EyA$E IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: O�)V(aU eals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative o ep esentative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : roperty Owner in Project . Area: Business v Residential Business Residential _ Other — Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization) (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed aff opinion regarding the p oject and . _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: /4 0-71,'/ Please ,,PJrin�t `� 2. HOME ADDRESS / / Z.�C )'v •<N 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: _ Business _k(Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : X, ' Wish to Spea (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: p" le—,6) 0q r3 S Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS ';� ( �? I 3 . PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST:, (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I aln apposedto the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : r Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED _ o • • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: P� Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS VWA 4LL 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I ap^apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : <4s to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak — Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: I ,/ Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS{ d W 3 . PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: Qf/®Map- LN ty (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential c Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : h ad �.t�'�i l R► �6 e 4. Iam 'in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak to the Project and : Wis to Spea (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak_ p (three minute maximum)' _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: 1 a 14J cif 1 A\ Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS c1k5� �64k' G!ELt) A UF. 3 . PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: tea) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s * Answere : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: zr4 /vUlrr 2. HOME ADDRESS -2�.207 .f��GO/�S ��'Y L�/1'E 1-71 '6 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: — Business z Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) R resentative of a Organization in Project Area : CS/oCiV /nA�/A�,eS roY� Name o Organization (d ) Other Interest : . (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to- Speak 5. I am a osed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED Zyy letin.4 i d�ssociatee SOFTWARE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 5312 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 19 November 1984 ZYG JELINSKI (714) 960.1129 PRESIDENT Members of the Council, Ladies and Gentlemen My name is Zyg Jelinski, President of Mariners! Cove Association , a condominium complex, located in the proposed project area. Tonight , you will make your decision on the Talbert Gap Flood Control document. I strongly ask you to reject it for the following reasons : 1 . The main purpose of this document is to beat the January 1st deadline, and to establish , and to give dictatorial powers to the H.B. Redevelopment Agency, in order to develop commercial areas of the City, acquire property, relocate people , raise and allocate funds to various projects. If you read Table of Contents carefully, Flood Control or any word, even remotely resembling it, is not there. 2. Flood Control in the title is an obvious misnomer, intended to mislead .th.e people of Huntington Beach , especially us, living in the proposed project area, on whom the financial burden must fall, without any assurance that we will be protected from floods. 3. The document does not contain any comprehensive plans for Flood Controls. 4. Appendix "C" outlines some of the work that would have been done by the City, whether this document is approved by you or not. Ewen then, it does not state what work will be done when. Will it be year 1990 or 3,000? 5. It is obvious that the Flood Control problem is left to the County, State and Federal Agencies. The exact relationship between the H.B. Redevelopment Agency and those Agencies is not even mentioned in the Plan. To us, the Homeowners, who live in the proposed project area, and who are no fools, itis obvious what is happening, as it must be obvious to you. So please, in your wisdom, do not allow for:-this rush and irresponsible act to happen,, and reject the document as written now. HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS -7/-?, �qvE /Z_/, 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: 0 a)a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: / Business ✓ Residential Business. Residential _ Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I gK apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED C9) HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute max ' um for those wishingto speak) 1 . NAME: S 0 IQ C- Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS 2 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization \7Ze41V4 (d) Other Interest : Please identify ) :y) 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: 122s . Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : Business X Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wist to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED a HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS d J-31 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant. or Representative arr Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property owner in Project Area: Business )(_ Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization) (a) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. 1 am .n favor of the project and : __ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. A am to the Project and : is a minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : 2raAve / : / .(R.(i Want the Fol "owing Questio s s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE F NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Q / Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. Z �e apposed to the Project and : K Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minut maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: l �" k— 0 Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. .PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: 4 gRepresentative Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. Vm apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: 4 2_ 0 25/ Plea e Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS LAz - 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (,�'K Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business f/ Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d ) Other interest : (Please identify) : 4. I any in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) —Do not Wish to Speak 5. I a a posed to' the Project and : XWish to SpeaK (.three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak b. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak ; — Do Not Wish to Speak , but : — Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record_ c r. it 1-1 7 Tanj the Fo 1 ing Qu s ons Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a thre minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: Please rant 2. HOME ADDRESS �-�-C�� P�P/�u t� Ld 3. IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) als Property Owner (b) .-Tenant or Representative or presentative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Pr-operty Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization) (d) Other Interest : (ease i dent ify) :� Y� 4. I am in favor of the project and : - -Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Spea (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : I Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record . Want t e Following Questions s Answere : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum �for / those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 1SJ/�WC/[�- 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a(a-)',� 'Reals Property Owner (b)' Tenant or Representative presentative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: /Residential Business Business Residential Other Other (c) Re sentativ of an. Organization in Pro 'ect rea : Name oorganization) (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I m apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6, i have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) - Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . 'NAME: 1 L 4 y ( fJ fJ-e?- Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS �..a—�o Jt4�T°tj h-C.- 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business V Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak apposed to the Project and : to Spea (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6 . I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) r Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : (USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 4 , NAME: C (C - 71,�:� Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS ID `� P A S (l 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: efoa Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential _ Business _ Residential — Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to •Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am a osed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 3. 'NAME 7 74 Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 7/D p 4 � 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Re resentative of an Organi tion in roject Ar n a n o .crr• 14 S c/rW ame of organization) (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : ^ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered :_ USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is/a� three minute maximumfor those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: b Please Print` 2. HOME ADDRESS C' 1S TJ r' e, 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reds Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : game of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . T am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Nish to Speak 5. S iim a2posed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. T have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do vot Wish to Speak De Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the -Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : VVLA /P a-A4 G L64L., Want t e Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED et&V--k_at HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL' REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: / -7_S Please Pri t 2. HOME ADDRESS c; 3. C- epresentative IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: als Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative of/Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in roject Area: Business Residential Business Residential — Other — Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . i am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak . (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am a2posed to the Project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) (-Do Not Wish to Speak la" 6. I have not formed an opinion*g, rding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak — Do Not Wish to Speak , but : — Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME (Please Print))/ 2 . HOME ADDRESS 0�J d '7 > /\ -)(9 u IX/` 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : Business Residential Business Residential _ Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : -- (Name-of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do pot Wish to Speak S. I • m apposed to the Project and : Wis to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have riot formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : — Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS �'� i Vq 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area : _ Business x Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of-.,an Organization in Project Area : K 'Name of—Organization) d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : _ n 4 . 1 am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish- to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) + Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. I,TEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : game of Organization) id) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am a osed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. T have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME : V- Ln vll Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS q3 3 t L*'l 3 . PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: ( Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative r Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Spea (three minute maximum) 1 Do Not Wish to Speak b, i have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : — Want the Following Comments ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a t ree inute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS QZ / W/-ZJ 1&T7-? 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business / Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I - am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to- Speak Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: ���� Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS A-A-21- Ake- A/IcT 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential Business Residential — Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three •minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) XA 1 . NAME: � t Y C� Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS ,,?_� R 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : _ Business .Residential _ Business _ Residential _ Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I jam apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: &aen ier ac*C r Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS 9Zb Z �� Al, B, 11'04 5L4' 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business ✓ Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Flodi( C0"*V4( Pre✓, 7 — rxfte fir' (Name of Organiza icrn (d) Other Interest: (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : _�Wis to Spea (three minute re minute maximum) ✓ Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: I� r Plea e Pr Ant) 2. HOME ADDRESS W,74,f cL 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: _ Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other _ Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : game of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. am a osed to the Project an _ Wis o pea t ree minute maximum) o Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute max ' u for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: �C�IIC'lr�GZ� Please P 2 int ! / �� � HOME ADDRESS O/� i A_ 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: Qa Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative epresentative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: / Business [/ Residential. Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization) (d Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) ZDo Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak, but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: LL Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS ' y 3 62aT&Iq7- 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : Wis to Speak (three minute maximum) �;/Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak, but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED ' HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: G CS / G Please Print 2. HOME ADDRESS 4 7J 'oz,�C,,� 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: (a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area : Business V Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization) (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak' Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered: USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Please Print 2 . SOME ADDRESS 3. ;PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: 'a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : / Business Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : --(Name of Organization) (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4. I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. I am apposed to the Project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak, but : — Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want tEe Following Questions(s ) Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1. NAME: Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: c,(a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area: Business ve Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am a osed to the Project and : Wish to Spea (three minute maximum) Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) — Do Not Wish to Speak — Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is athree minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: 600A,41,5S L1 TT —A;2/V Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS Pa/a Z)/Z s. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: �a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : Business ✓ Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak S. I am apposed to the Project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) ADO Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak — Do Not Wish to Speak , but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is anthree minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: C�� C�/�N - 44't e- . Please Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: a) Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project. Area: Business i/ Residential Business Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d ) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do not Wish to Speak 5. ? am apposed to the Project and : — Wi to Speak (three minute maximum) \ Not Wish to S D o Iv peak 6. 1 have not formed an opinion regarding the ro 'ect a d : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak , but : _ Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED • • HUNTINGTON BEACH TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: Aalk / �4yN Please/ Print 2 . HOME ADDRESS �� I� 4SAAU" Pw C /k 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: 0 Reals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area: Property Owner in Project Area: Business Residential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : (Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please identify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum). Do not Wish to Speak Qam apposed to the Project and : Wis to Speak (three minute maximum) �( Do Not Wish to Speak 6. I have not formed an opinion regarding the project and : — Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) Do Not Wish to Speak _ Do Not Wish to Speak, but : Want the Following Comment(s ) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered : USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED HUNTINGTON BEACH DfST T REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (There is a three minute maximum for those wishing to speak) 1 . NAME: �i7� L 1� APaS S' ` leasePrint) 2. HOME ADDRESS 6 1' ��� �o cvB De:( 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY YOUR INTEREST: E�e'presentative eals Property Owner (b) Tenant or Representative of Real of Tenant in Project Area : Property Owner in Project Area : Business �esidential _ Business _ Residential Other Other (c) Representative of an Organization in Project Area : Name of Organization (d) Other Interest : (Please idenify) : 4 . I am in favor of the project and : _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) �Do not Wish to SpeakZ;i ama osed to thet and : ate maximum) Vlro�Not Wish to Speak 6. 1 have not formed an opinion regarding the project and: _ Wish to Speak (three minute maximum) _ Do Not Wish to Speak Do Not Wish to Speak, but : _ Want the Following Comment(s) Entered into the Official record : Want the Following Questions s Answered: USE OTHER SIDE IF NEEDED WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF, HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, NAME. ADDRESS DATE 80 .10 71 04 C/,/g 0 0 • WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE - - � 77ya y 77 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE 44 "o 5 Mopoc- Cdm 4-4 ell I J t. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE ly WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME / ADDRESS DATE A hl V?-/4 - //o f nik el- */�li e( fr _ � 77:Z �.�/�- WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME �Itl ADDRESS ,o DATE � OR G CrVl� e � A- G 13 PIAc&. <1tcf-�! ? 7A--d�d&Z Kx I 1 i WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE ol (D t WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE EEC C 2f 22lA"W( ,o 1 ESL c � P rAdl- . ._ -wes i _ ids�JL•sr Ci IP I 'y--q+�=le V 1i 444 Ae— wa 67- 9 ! woob/,g ay Dt< 9U v6 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE C S 4 Z e fv el - �Y?�/S ,� �r�o , �t� l6 - � � l • 15 - � y YY Q S b G - /9-F �ol 11 11s -8_, .,=►��- �,�„�� ,� t�t�- � ��- � if -p_g (,JE A-C—y �777 COR.LR twcsCR i -7' 93 R 117 h rep 5�� , d . p WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE MtL au La '' _ ��2 S+�►py b�t �Q. ��'s • WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. ADDRESS DATE WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS/ l DATE rARAA Lmp� �41-- r 1. 6. i i 1 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 5ME ADDRESS 1 DATE ell- VI 295(p S2±Zw',lj0 C(P-C& APS s �llr �.i<�►��_ �32. 2t-�;- t`7�. �,g .�`26y-b 11 - I�{-��'�' t,oA Tl' a� 'l OT Q� �� Y\ c;Q// WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. _ ADDRESS DA TE .11r2 1 Lee N ebp�-T 9 k PI 13 `Lv TIE 'S"cf114XRnAit , f /J —I t Qieko no C4�Ai�—� ,tea_ Rey WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. ti NAME ADDRESS DATE 22.4 5 11-1L� W D-7-2AAZ 4 t wa, )lei t W aA-T 46 1 A-1w-8 y WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE CT-n jQ qo�I DE, l ?J1ZS) nQr LdAp, �LL � ,OqLL r T - (,� ki B , S46UOL E -u 031 Grr-ir-Al /D 0,12 / /f/� L Y(09', C-0 ran Loa 11, b C. udk� 131 is eec I-e1d AN 3 � eeo! r � !i ,�, 1 � 8Y WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. ADDRESS DATE /�sl cjLAajo #42 bra EI- A 11 --74.y /o A3 . I lot-, o5f4 (ate S-�. 1� . �_ 126gB A6 ► o tl It qhlpy A 114F —"elzl-ftA .I WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE L. Azz �y la D o�do�c us 'Wig _;. - U�-tr Coy� l ? �►ss 1� �� � Z �/ elloA 45 6 r tit . TF c A' t L 9��Z Xkw7 LA21 1 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE 6&4d b.� f z 60 03 / Jz 8'S l c d u i w ,L�_ Z WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRES�Sj DATE JZ_x-1 � ll`f�v�GliS�i3 42 9 Q an�4—&c %zo Llvz' Iff 7.� A OlaihuA— G A ^ : . Dj. '' V E WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SUPPORT THE TALSERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. NAME ADDRESS DATE dais a) , ceLos cuL'g00 ' (7 -0 ell- 9 ' `�_ r [ ` �/S S t ��•'-� /_emu :�"�j% //1 ����1 . ,, .� � � ✓7D-3 •�/- •�� day // 12 71 �= c Its ilt m r a• •.. � �. .� .ram � �� � �. � �� • . .�� � .� . WWWAOLT ....��. .: ��� ��� . �• . . ��...��.�� �. ,per �! A PETITION TO PUBLIC OFFICIALS TO PROVIDE FLOOD CONTROL IN HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA A� March 1984 WHEREAS: We, the undersigned live in the Santa Ana River Flood plain which has been declared to be the most disastrous flood potential west of the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS: We support legislation now under consideration in Congress to commence._uPgrading of the Santa Ana Main.stem flood control ' project; and WHEREAS: The Talbert Valley area in Huntington Beach is not included in that legislation and yet, in 1983 suffered $15,622,000 in damages, 780 homes damaged, 4200 residents evacuated or displaced who still experience psychological trauma from their experiences. NOW THEREFORE': We, the undersigned do hereby - petition responsible officials at each .government level, city, county, state and federal, to take immediate steps to provide flood control protection which meets the federal standard of a 100-year flood for the HuntingtonjBeach area -in the County of Ora;:.3e by 1985 incliadinq: 1 . Joint agreement .by Orange County, Huntington Beach and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers on the best design for flood control construction in Huntington Beach, 2. Approvals as required by the State of California Coastal and Fish and Game Commissions and the U.S. Wildlife Commission . 3. Proportionate funding agreement by the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, the State. of California ' Water Resources Board and the U.S. government. 4. Preparation and introduction by Congressmen Badham and Lungren of CRISES LEGISLATION IN FY84, appropriating necessary funds to initiate construction of flood control measures by 1985. Name Street Address Zit Phone ---� --- -- ---- ---- �1�12�� /�/ 9Z60. gyp 9sa- av 1 II eeo to �RON �- - A PETITION TO PUBLIC OFFICIALS TO PROVIDE FLOOD CONTROL IN. HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA t March 1984 WHEREAS: We, the undersigned live in the Santa Ana River I Flood plain which has been declared to be the most disastrous flood potential west of the Mississippi River.; and WHEREAS: We support legislation now under consideration in Congress to commence upgrading of the Santa Ana. Mainstem flood control project.; and WHEREAS: The Talbert Valley area in Huntington Beach is not included in that legislation and yet, in 1983 suffered 015,622,000 in damages, 780 homes damaged, 4200 residents evacuated or displaced who still experience psychological trauma from their experiences. NOW THEREFORE: We, the undersigned do hereby petition responsible officials at each government level, city, county, state and federal, to take immediate steps to provide flood control protection which meets the federal standard of a 100-year flood for the Huntington Beach area in the County of Orange by. 1985 including : 1 . Joint agreement by Orange County, Huntington Beach and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers on the best design for flood control construction in Huntington Beach; 2. Approvals as required by .the State of California. Coastal and Fish and Game Commissions and the U.S. Wildlife Commission. 3. Proportionate funding agreement by the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, the State of California .' . Water Resources Board and the U.S. government. 4. Preparation and introduction by Congressmen Badham and Lungren of CRISES LEGISLATION IN FY84, appropriating necessary funds to initiate construction of flood control measures by 1985. Name Street Address Zig Phone V16 2- J9llky s .. O FLO PREVENTION PETITION -� TO �O -HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the -State and Federal governments. We oppose the-_ formation of the Talbert trap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is- t-oo costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood vict-ims`-rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative .controls; - and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ----------------- NAM _______________ TELEPHONE 147/0/_5 r11(-'C PAe- 1111117- 13111 /Le _ice 2� S3y__ �.�C__� ---_ _. as 6 ' -=----- If -----------L - - - - ---- ---- - -------&--3 ---- ink - - ----------�_62_2g4_ Sao ry _DA& ----- ---------- --- .�-o - � YX A P blOic Service P oject of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON BEACH FL& PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by .general fund allocations. to obtain concrete channels (D01, DO` & D05) in cooperation .with Orange County, . the State and Federal governments. We oppose "th.e: .format ion of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is- t.00 costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations can flood vict ms-.r-ather than the perpetrators; places us. under arbitrary adminis-trative controls; - and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. -- -------------- NAME _____ ADDRESS ________,________________ TELEPHONE ____-_ _ Y.L�esc 1'._1� -- - : . -- - -- ------ �- i '40"" '�6 -------=� --- s - 3----- _P_V�----------- -=-�6- - =-Lys. � -------------------- --- - -- ----`-'4- -�s-� - -- -4 -- ----- -- ---- !G--- GZ' --_ - - - _- r 10 - ----------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON PEACH FL& PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council 'to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap -Redevelopment Agency because. the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victims--rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative:-controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. -------------------- NAME _ ADDRESS__________ _ _ TELEPHONE At -- — --�=t` ----1_ -=_-----� G =f _ _ i�i--------------------y- - --__---a=_- -- ti 9s-- - ---------- - --=- woAM 10C -c - _------=----- -- _9av YW It -AA - --------- 41 - A 2- ---- -- -- - -- --- is _________________ A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON BEACH 11 fY 1%y-FP6R&FT)7—. 1Ohl FLOD PREVENTION PETITION . • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority . of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the 'formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because. the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound.; . places. all obligations on flood victims--.rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary . administrati_ae_"controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt -------------------- NAME ADDRESS ______ TELEPHONE -�- _ - - --- ------__ ��11� - 24 L4Z ---------------- ------------------------ ------------ 44 IL fa f-: 7_1 7ZI3 95 --------- - ------z - - -- --- =°`zl -- - --- ------ -3--= °-3 - A Public Service Proof the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTOON BE FAD PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to- obtain concrete channels (D01, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County,. the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Tac�,bert Gap Redevelopr��ent Agency because the plan is -too costly and fiscally_. unsound; places all obligations on flood victims rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative-: controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach .debt. ------------------- NA E _ ADDRESS__ TELEPHONE -------------------------- --------------- r- :9- h - ----------q-774----------------- K co iL 01 0 - -------- -A i5 _ --- ------------- 5119 -, Ora) Wen JYR ___ _________________________________________________ - ____________________________________^____ ______________-_-___-________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------_--------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON BEACH AD PREVENTION PETITION •. TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & DOS) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is too costly and fiscally unsound; . places all obligations on flood "victims rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative , ontro s; and will escalate Huntington each debt. T-- NAM _ ADDRESS�6�1--- - - _ ... _ �3 EL pb4 g AY 41 2- r ___-- ----_----________ _ 7 - ----------- - - --- -- - ------------ i f�Ina" s '34 _ ---1 ------ "-------- _ �- , ------------- 5 3- � S ' � ` °=` k� _;; ----------------- A - Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON PEACH �L��D PREVENTION PETITION ' TO . HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIk. We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (0O1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victims rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ___________________ �%n 01 toq - --------------------- qzG 10 ------------------ 920t-S a e f-A Lit 7-1: Y_ e, .� ---- ---------Z�'---------------- -v---- --------��------------------- _______________________________________________________________________ A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGT8N BEACH �� 1�16����. ���' �^��� v . ' _ �� i FA PREVENTION. PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DOI, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victims ,rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary. administrative controls; and will _ escalate Huntington Beach debt. ------------------- NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE - - - ---------- -- --------- ----------- -z - -�= Yi/t e a r P s ---�?s�i---K►n 1•e-Dr--1=��=--------_----_ kad5. IL-7 ----i�v lab p4v_"------------- - ----------- 113 -,--- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------------=------------------------ A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON BEACH r�fi6�$y-FpGp,�T1r. Ia�Y F&D PREVENTION PETITION •TO HUNTINGT0N BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its -stated priority of. flood prevention by general fund .allocations to-obtain concrete channels (DO1, DOE &. D05) in cooperation with Orange ,Co.unty, the- State and -Federal- governments. We oppose_.t-h:e formation of the. Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is--too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations an flood _vict-:rmas- :rather -than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administr.at-rv_e _controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. NA E - - ADDRESS TELEPHONE _ - --- ---- -- --= = ----------- --- -- -- - _ _- '� ---_=------- _------- 4-4 AL _ - VAA ' --_ IL _- - ---- -;c----4�= y----_-- _ =___--- �= ^pv - .72E5 -- ---3 1--------- __ 7_ 17- _ ___ _ __ ___ ___ _______ - -------------I( _ - ------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------- - ----------------------------------------- --�_ ----- -------- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A Public Service. Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON BEACH I-ON • F�D PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to . immediately initiate its --stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to---obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with. Orange County, the-- State and Federal governments. We oppose. the__ formatian of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan i--s-.-t.00 costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood .victroes- .rather than the perpetrators; places us: under arbitrary administrat-i=.v_e -controls; .and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. NAME--- --- ADDRESS------ --------------- -------- TELEPHONE --- - - � - -- -_- ---------------- ---------- I, -- ____ ______ -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A Public Service_ Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON PEACH_ t1fi��$y-FpGP.F7 �r: 10 1 --- - - AD PREVENTION PETITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL . We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately. initiate its.-stated priority of flood prevention by general fund -allocations to"obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange -_Cau-nty, the State and Federal governments, We oppose_,-thy_-formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is-'-too co.stly_ and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood .vict-imm _rather -than the perpetrators,- places us under arbitrary administr.at- -v-e _controls-, and will escalate Huntington. Beach debt. --------------------- NAME .___ ADDRESS-------------- TELEPHOtIg 13 -------------- ------------ - - -----------;---------- -------------------- ----- --- ------------ ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- - _-___-__-----------------------__-_-__---_-___- A Public Service. Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON PEACH. FLZlDD PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINDTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request .the City Council to immediately initiate .its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan .is--too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood :victims.. rather than the perpetrators; places us under. arbitrary administrat-i-ve- controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt.. .. -------------------- -- AME---- -=---- ADDRESS----- --- - -- - -----=- TELEPHONE A U4-w' -_-- ------- 77 .{. _-------- ----- ---_ ---------- ------_ ------------ -- ! _ .---------- ---- -- .�-_�-. ------------------ --------------- . -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON PEACH ��fi6��y-Fp6P.,6:-r1r: 14ON L AD PREVENTION PETITION • i/ TO HUNTINOTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council to immediately initiate its -stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (D01, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange -_County, the- State and Federal governments. We oppose-thy formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is---too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations can flood :vct-i : rather than the perpetrators; places us 'under arbitrary administrative -controls; '-and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. NAME ADDRESS_jS'- _- iL /�_-�1 �1_ ll�'TELEPHONE - - -- - - - -'--------=--------=-- - -=---- - - 3-2� =----- ------` - -- --= ! ! ..Or R-. - ------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ' A Public, Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPIHUNTINGTON BEACH t�fig/$y-.F.06P,67177. .ION FLD PREVENTION PETITION •. TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels, (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State. and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because. . the plan is --too- costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood -victims.. rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary admi.6istrat_ive: controls; .and .will escalate Huntington Beach. debt. NAME ADDRESS TE19PHDbI . I- 00 --------------- -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON BEACH 1,1i61$y-FP&P —,r1 r. ION - - FL*D PREVENTION PETITION �P rt TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to -obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the -State and Federal governments. We oppose-the-.formation- of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because " the plan is _t.00. costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on . flood victirrr .rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrati-ve .:controls; - and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ------------------ --- . NAME --= ----- ADDRESS------------------ --- ----- TELEPHONE et ------------------------------------------------------------------- --- A Public Service -Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION G OUPMUNTINGTON PEACH T�7 IoN orm�f3tjiio %,4, tA,3oRQ:n► M/ imI .Foc(ddkAt FA PREVENTION PETITION TO PA K PLAe _ 7�4CT HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request - the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of- flood prevention by general fund . allocations. to obtain concrete channels (DOI, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal- governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because. the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victims-,.rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary . administrative:-controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. NAM ____. ^' ADDRESS_ ----------------- ---------- TELEPHOLVE l /- — --------- - - ---- - - - --- -- - - - -_ - sus ---- ----------- 4 -� d2%/� ( 6s -{..� ,� , ��� 5 � ----------------------------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON BEACH ION AJ IAI FA PREVENTION PETITION ?A&PLACE T2kT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange _County, the State and Federal governments. .We oppose -the_ _formation of the Talbert Gap. Redevelopment Agency because the plan is. -t.00. costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood vict-i­rrs_.rrather than the perpetrators; places us under. arbitrary administrative controls; --and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ----------------- NAME _ - - ADDRESS TELEPHONE ----------------- --- - - - - -- - 2 3 ��----------s_-3 6/ _ 37_,�_ - ----- -- - Q1� ----- _ �o, �. ---- - -- -- -- - ----------- _ --------- _ ! --- L o 1— -- --_ �_-----y�� _ /� a T S" 03 Z 9 CC 3 a -2-a-LIL:AY _1Y0 7 ------- a is MN - 5 �/ - --- ------ - � s1_. --- ---------- A Public Service Project-,of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON BEACH t��i6 '5 y-Fp6P.6"1 r_.. JOKY 0is7r?XgV r.Fo e�l ,;�949Wo y14A1 oZi��z�sTo�l ,C/v • FA PREVENTION PETITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents,, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in. cooperation with Orange Co-unty, .the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victims -rather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administratiyp:-controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach. debt.-------------------- NAME - ---- ADDRESS ----- TE�EPHDNE ------- --- -- ------------------------------- -- - 64,VLA C2211-81f 12----- _iD, 4R any - -a' - - ----- !-=----------- ----- ---- ___` .---- ------------ VO ___ 4 -------A/_L✓'_-'�^'_""�___L Lim - -- eyL --- -- C� 9 Z - - ------ _ -- =----- - --- --��- 1�v -. -- ----- �- �;---------- -------- -------------spa=so=� -xv A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON BEACH f'P&'P77-17-. I-ON T�isT�2i�dr i� � � f3a•�•P���J o2✓112Pos.Toc14) FLA PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ' We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in- cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert .Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations' on flood victi►ns.•.rrather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative:-controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ------------------- NAME ___ ADDRESS_ _ TELEPHONE ------ - -- --- - - ------------------------- -.2boc---- Z'4----=�. -��-�-- AJ a :r am r�zn, . _ d2 / c _C------ 43 16 - PIS Ch - - ---- A Public Service :.-Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON BEACH I-ON FLA PREVENTION PETITION • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City 'Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, -the State and-federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is ,too costly and fiscally unsound;. places all obligations on flood victims -.rather than the perpetrators; places. us under arbitrary administrative controls;. and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. ------------------- NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE �- �=--- -- - -`- ----- _ - � -2 llC�;. cog--- =--��-� - --- --. ---- - ---- - - - ----- f - ---- - - --- -- AL ---- - --- ----&L A Public Se ice Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPIHUNT-T-l" JON FLA PREVENTION PETITION • TO 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request the City Council to immediately initiate its stated, priority' of flood prevention by general fund allocations to -obtain concrete channels (DO1, D02 & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the -State and Federal governments. We oppose -.the- formation of the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is _too costly and .fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victi-ms-rrather than the perpetr_ ators; places us under -arbitrary administrative -controls- - and will escalate Hun ington Beach debt. NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE ------ _ - ----- ------- -------------- ---- A. --- -----------�i_�_- C� ---------------------- -53114 NO V � c � 7 • 4f�3 5i 68 - __ OS_ -_• I �r-� ------- -_- -_---- _- - - - - •, •� � w-- -- ---------- ------------ ------- ---r=--------- -- --------------------------------------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPIHUNTINGTON BEACH FLA PREVENTION PETITION • • TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund allocations to obtain-, concrete- channels (DO1, DOE & D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of :the .Talbert Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is -too- costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood victimsrather than the perpetrators; places us under arbitrary administrative- controls; and will escalate Huntington Beach debt. NAME _ n ADDRESS __________ TELEPHONE 10 ---- � ---------------- ------ - ---z - - _ - ------ 1�-=--- - -9 _ Z 4ae_�- r-------------���_ ov - -- - ------------------ ------------------------------------------------- - ------------- ------------------------ ------------ ------------------ -------.-----------------------=----------------------- -----= ------ i ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A Public' Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUPMUNTINGTON PEACH •' FLi PREVENTION PETITION TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL We, the undersigned residents, request . the City Council to immediately initiate its stated priority of flood prevention by general fund . allocations to- obtain concrete channels (DOI, D02 &. D05) in cooperation with Orange County, the State and Federal governments. We oppose the formation of the Talbert . Gap Redevelopment Agency because the plan is -too costly and fiscally unsound; places all obligations on flood ictims .rather than the perpetrators; DiaceS us nder arbitrary administrative:-controls; and will esca a e untington Beach debt. NAME _ __ ADDRESS --- TELEPHONE ' ---- -- =-- - ---- - .- - - -�- � yc =_---_�7�{6 wall- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- A Public Service Project of the FLOOD PREVENTION GROUP/HUNTINGTON .BEACH , �s kQ.TTCE OE -A__..JOINT.,.PUBLIC HEARING BY T_HE,,.p,CZY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF HUNTING T ON�� BtALH�ANO._TH,E HUNT INGTON BEACH _._REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY_,_,._ON THE PROPOSED TALBERT . GAP ...FLOOD . CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT" PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. "84-5_..., ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency have set Monday, November 19, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. as the time and the City Council Chambers of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, as the place for a joint public hearing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelop- ment Agency to consider the approval and adoption of the proposed Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Plan and certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 84-5. The proposed Redevelopment Project Area covers approximately 3.44 square miles of land, and has the following boundaries (see �g map): 61 From the northeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue,. continuing east along Garfield to Brookhurst Street, south along Brookhurst Street to Yorktown Avenue, then west to Bushard Street, south along Bushard to Banning Avenue, then east to Brookhurst, southwest along Brookhurst to the northern boundary of the Orange County Flood Control District, then along said Channel DO-2 to the City limits, then southwest along City boundary to the south flood control boundary. Following the southern boundary of the flood control channels (DO-2) and generating plant. Again, following the southern and western boundaries of the flood control channel (DO-1 ) to Atlanta Avenue, . west along Atlanta to Beach Boulevard, then south along Beach Boulevard to the limits of the resi- dential. development; then west to Delaware, north along Delaware Street to Atlanta , and then following the bluffline until it approaches Newland north of Ellis at Newland, south along Newland to Atlanta, east along Atlanta to Magnolia, and then north along Magnolia Street to the City limits. The purpose of the joint public hearing is to consider: 1 . The Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Agency which proposes as its scope and objectives to eliminate unsafe and unsanitary conditions for the existing housing stock due to flood hazard; provide needed flood control improvements to existing facilities, including flood control channels, storm drains, pump stations, and retarding basins; and encourage participation , coordination, and cooperation with area residents, businesses, and public agencies. 2. The report of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan includes, but is not limited to, the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission on the Plan and EIR 84-5, and the report of the County Fiscal Review Committee (if any). 3. Environmental Impact Report No. 84-5 which assesses the environmental impacts of the proposed flood control improvements within the Project Area. 1220d - 4. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and certification of the Environmental Impact Report. At the above stated day, hour, and place, any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental 'Impact Report or to the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted and the Environmental Impact Report certified. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report may file in writing with the City Clerk a statement of his objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Any person or organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. At the aforesaid hour the City Council and Redevelopment Agency shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written and oral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report. The proposed Redevelopment Plan, Environmental Impact Report, and related documents are now on file and open for public inspection in the office of the Director of the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648, and at the Huntington Central Library and all City library annexes. Owner participation rules are also available for review through the same office and address at City Hall . All property owners, businesspersons, and/or tenants wishing to participate in the project must submit a "Statement of Interest to Participate" form to the Redevelopment Agency at the aforesaid address by January 28, 1985. Telephone No. (714) 536-5271 Dated ®C �0 'rat, b t ; �es �t 4 C 1.4 nn /V, // G 0 t I`I V.v /V 40 0'JL7)&i ) -50,23 7 J 1220d l � r � t IO ZONING INDEX MAP 9-5-II 10-5-II � DM 9 .I LEGEND t 19-6-10-SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 1 16• -II 15-5 11 14-5 11 ---_____A_ OM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22' DMI16 Dtv)17 MIS I 24.5�I 19-5-11 I 20T5 I _ 21-t�-N _ _'-22-5-11 2 -S-II 24-b-1� DM W,,,, 1 DM 21 I �L3 DMI24 DI 125 i DM�27 i I 1 I \, 30 5-II ..„ 29 S II 2&��;,JI 27 II 2 5-11 25- -II AM 35\ DM 34 --._ ��DM 33 D 32 DM 31 DM 30. vn A i �n32 5`II 33-5-II y`1�. 3q'- -11 35 5 II r5 11 DM 3\6D M 37 �i / 38 39�` D,".4O - — — [ �i 5-6 ��1r--I� 3-6-II 2 'b 11 -II ?6+4S Ip i :::; 5�6 10 I \ - DM4 D DM3 R 2 ��::DN 1 yl E 6 DM� 9-6-II 0-6-II 11- II� �'�-'6-II8-6-10 DMIO I DM I\ DM12 7 DM8 °i . !1 I i ! OI4\ & 1': :::::::::.: ::785;6 ,10 17-6 10 D CITY OFC�y MI DM DM19 HUNTINGTON BEACH -I ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA w 24-6-I sin=%.��• DM29 a1 bnMro•.+c•1o.,ru I y R.•..e to+wv.w �u•o. I i , TALbERT GAP FLOOD .CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT .SCRIPT JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN r FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOMENT PROJECT { . NOVEMBER 19 , 1984 Call to Order. MAYOR : This hearing will be. called to order. This is a joint session of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. The purpose of this session is to conduct a joint public hearing to consider and act upon the proposed adoption of the Redevelopment .Plan. for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project and the Project environmental impact report . . (EIR) I Any and all persons having any objections to or statements in favor of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, _comments in the Project environmental impact -1- • report , will be given an opportunity to speak at this public hearing . Roll Call @f -- ' ' Agency MAYOR: For the record of this joint public .hearing , please call the roll of the members of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency. . C1[2 K AGENCY ` EGRE.I RY : (Roll Cali of Agency Members ) Introductory Statement Concerning Procedures MAYOR : I will now open this jo-int public hearing . Notice of this joint public hearing has.. been published four times -and mailings sent to property owners. and others as required by law. As at all Council mee-tings , a recording of this meeting is. being made and is part of the record. Persons making statements and giving testimony will be subject to questions, through the Chair. . All persons desiring to speak will be given an opportunity to do so. -2- On the. .front table are agendas for this joint public hearing . If you plan to speak today , would you. please fill out the form on the table at the entrance of the Council Chambers and- give it to the City Clerk now, if you have not done so. already. Our - order of procedure today will. be as follows : 1 . Agency staff and consultants will present the . Redevelopment Plan ; and the Agency 's Report to City Council on the Redevelopment Plan ; and the Project environmental impact report . 2 . Next we will receive any written comments . 3 . We. will then receive any evidence- or oral testimony . from those present concerning the. Redevelopment Plan and the Project environmental impact report . 4 . Following the introduction of all evidence and testimony today , and upon the conclusion of the public hearing , the City council and Redevelopment Agency will consider and act -3- a upon 'all objections and then act on the Project j environmental impact report and Redevelopment Plan. The Agency staff and consultant-s will now proceed with its. report. Mr . Thompson would you please introduce the .staff of consultants who will make the presentations and respond to questions: THOMPSON : I would like to introduce James Palin, Director of Development Services ; Florence Webb , Senior. Planner.;. Paul Cook , Director of Public Works ; Bob Franz ' Director of Administrative Services ; Allan A Robertson and Larry Arceneaux , Principals with Katz Hollis ; . Thomas .Clark , Attorney, Stradling , Yocca . AGENCY STAFF : (Reviews the Redevelopment Plan, the Report to and Consultant City Council , and the Project_ Environmental, Impact Report . ) MAYOR : Are there any questions by members 'of the 'Council. or the. Agency on the proposed Redevelopment Plan , the Agency Report to City Council , or the Project environmental impact report? (Question by Members of Council and Agency). -4- If there are no objections , the. Redevelopment Plan , the Report of the Agency , including the Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission and the. Project environmental impact report , will be made •a part of the record , along with the testimony we have just. heard. MAYOR If there are .any written comments received on the proposed Redevelopment Plan , they will be placed into the record at this time. Will the City Clerk proceed to read the letters received concerning the Redevelopment Plan or the Project environmental impact report . CITY CLERK• (Reads into Record any Written -Comments Received) MAYOR : We will now hear any statements , testimony , or questions from the audience . . Please begin your statement by- giving your name , address , and the organization, if. any , you represent. Please also . 0 -5- indicate whether you are a resident or property owner in the Project ' Area. Any and all. persons having objections .or desiring to speak in favor of the proposed Redevelopment Plan , or who wish to comment upon the Project environmental impact report , may speak now. MAYOR : Will. the City Clerk please call the names of the persons who have submitted forms to ' speak in opposition of the proposed project. (Oral Testimony, Statements , and. Questions ) MAYOR : Will the City Clerk please call the names of persons who have submitted forms to speak in favor of the proposed project. (Oral Testimony , Statements, and Questions) MAYOR :. This joint public hearing of the City Council and Community Redevelopment Agency is closed . Does the Council/Agency wish to have Staff repsond to . any of the comments presented? Are there any questions by members of the .Council/Agency on the Redevelopment Plan, report to Council or EIR? AGENCY CHAIRb9AN The Agency will now cons.ider approval of the following motions or resolutions in the following order : 1 . Resolution No. 97 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPRCVING THE FINAL REPORT OF THE PROPOSED TALBERT 'GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. " 2 . Resolution No. 98 " .RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF, HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. " 3 . Resolution No. '. 99 . - "A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT. There now being no further business before the Agency , the..Chair will entertain a motion to adjourn. -7- (Motion of Agency to adjourn) City Council in Session MAYOR The City Council , in session ,. will now consider and act on the matters before it . MAYOR : 1 .. Resolution No. 5462 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF :THE CITY OF. HUNTINGTON. BEACH RULING ON THE OBJECTIONS TO THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. " 2 . Res.olution No . 5463 - "A RESOLUTION OF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT . . FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL "DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. " (1411d) -8- 3 . Resolution No. .5464 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .� FIN'DING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE FRUPOSE OF HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT. " MAYOR : The Chair entertains a motion to approve . introduction of Ordinance No. ' 2742 . CITY CLERK : The City Clerk gives. the first reading of Ordinance No.. 274.2 by title . Ordinance No. 27.42 "AN ORDINANCE -OF THE CITY OF H.UNTINGTON . BEACH ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. ': f t k (141td) -9 • REQUEST OR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AAN Y Date November 19, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency M-90ters Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Of ce , James W. Palin Director Develo ment Services Prepared by: ' ' p O Subject: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR TALBERT GAP FLOOD NTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA US '77-9if-95- FA.leo 11,4-v,e's - d 3 xPs � Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative.Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Redevelopment Agency and City Council have scheduled a joint public hearing to take public testimony on the proposed Redevelopment Plans and final EIR for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area. Following the public hearing, the , Agency and the City Council may take actions which will result in . the adoption of the Plan. The Redevelopment Agency must .take certain actions before the. Plan can be adopted by the City Council. The attached resolution, when adopted by the Agency, will carry out these actions. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolutions taking the following actions : 1 . Approving the final Report to' City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap. Flood Control Project Area and authorizing its submittal to the City Council . 2 . Making a finding that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside of the Project Area is of benefit to the Project. 3. Certifying the final EIR, and if necessary adopting a statement of overriding considerations. ANALYSIS : On October 2 , - 1984, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Talbert Gap Flood Control Central Redevelopment Plan Draft EIR. The hearing was opened , public testimony taken and the hearing closed. The Planning Commission directed staff to incorporate the public comments into the final EIR by the following role call : ain eia, • • AYES : Livengood , Higgins , Winchell , Mirjahangir , Porter , Erskin. NOES : None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None On October 16, 1984 the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 1334 with findings recommending to the City Council that the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Project Area Plan not be adopted. The resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission by the following roll call : AYES : Higgins , Winchell , Livengood , Schumacher, Mirjahangir, Porter , Erskin. NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None On November 13, 1984 , the staff brought back the plan for ' reconsideration by the Planning Commission based on revisions to the plan and additional information. The plan had been substantially revised by the staff and the City ' s Redevelopment legal council to make it flow in a more orderly fashion , remove inconsistencies and to remove references to eminent domain and condemnation. The City and the county had also • completed their negotiations and there was a firm commitment by the county to support the plan. Based on one of the Commission' s findings for denial of the plan, is that adoption of the plan would hinder future relationships with the county. Staff felt that this agreement with the county and their support was important information for the Planning Commission to have. The plan did reconsider these actions of October 16, 1984 and adopted Resolutions 1337 with findings recommending to the City Council that the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Plan not be adopted. The resolutions was adopted by this following roll call : AYES : Livengood , Schumacher , Mirjahangir , Porter , Erskin . NOES : Higgins. ABSENT: Winchell . ABSTAIN: None The above actions constitute an official record of the City Council ' s actions and deliberations in regard to the two .proposed Redevelopment Plans. Each of the actions is necessary to complete the process of adopting the Plans. By taking these actions , the City Council makes it possible to complete the adoption of the Redevelopment Plane; prior to the end of 1984 . If adoption is not completed by then, it may not be possible at all . The attached resolutions constitute an official record of the Agency 's actions and deliberations in regard to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Each of the actions is necessary to complete the process of adopting the Plans. By adopting the resolutions , the Agency makes it possible to complete the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan prior to the end of 1984. If adoption is not completed by then , it may not be possible at all. ( 1429d) -2- November 19, 1984 FUNDING SOURCE: None needed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS : Do not adopt the attached resolutions. In this case , there will be insufficient time to adopt the Redevelopment Plan before the new law goes into effect on January 1 , 1985. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Resolutions and ordinances pertaining to the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan - 2 . Resolutions and ordinance pertaining to the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Plan. 3. Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area Plan. 4. Report to Council 1 . 0 Reasons for Selection of the Project Area 2 . 0 Description of the Physical , Social and Economic Conditions Existing in the Project Area. 3. 0 Proposed Financing Methods 4. 0 Relocation Plan 5. 0 Analysis of Preliminary Plan 6. 0 Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission 7. 0 Summary of PAC Meetings of Owners and Businesses 8. 0 Conformance with General Plan 9. 0 Environmental Impact Report 10. 0 Report of the County Fiscal Officer 11. 0 Report of the Fiscal Review Committee (if any) 12. 0 Neighborhood Impact Report 13. 0 Analysis of the report submitted by the County including a summary of agency consultations with each of the taxing agencies. JWP :FW:lcp (1429d) -3- November 19, 1984 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date November 19, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services '�:' �o Subject: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORD ANCES FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS C'Ow,,c L ion Alp' Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: Al-i/-iq-S4/0�7. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency have scheduled a joint public hearing to take public testimony on the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Draft EIR for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area,;. Following the public hearing , the City Council and the Agency may take actions which will result in the adoption of the Plan. The City Council must adopt certain Resolutions before introducing the ordinances adopting the Plans. The proper resolutions and the ordinances are attached. RECOMMENDATION: Take the following actions : q 1 . Adopt a motion receiving the Redevelopment Plan, Report to City Council on the Redevelopment Plan and other documents submitted by the Agency. 2 . After holding the joint public hearing , adopt the attached resolution which: a) Rule on objections to the Project b) Certify the Final EIR and , if necessary, adopt statements of overriding considerations c) Find that the provision of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area is of benefit to the Project 3. Motion approving proposal change in Development Plan. 4. Introduce the attached ordinances adopting the Redevelopment Plans. PIO 4/81 ANALYSIS : On October 2 , 1984 , the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Talbert Gap Flood Control Central Redevelopment Plan Draft EIR. The hearing was opened , public testimony taken and the hearing closed. The Planning Commission directed staff to incorporate the public comments into the final EIR by the following role call : AYES: Livengood , Higgins , Winchell , Mirjahangir, Porter , Erskin. NOES : None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None On October 16, 1984 the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 1334 with findings recommending to the City Council that the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Project Area Plan not be adopted. The resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission by the following roll call : AYES : Higgins , Winchell , Livengood , Schumacher , Mirjahangir, Porter , Erskin. NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None On November 13, 1984, the staff brought back the plan for reconsideration by the Planning Commission based on revisions to the plan and additional information. The plan had been substantially revised by the staff and the City' s Redevelopment legal council to make it flow in a more orderly fashion , remove inconsistancies and to remove references to eminent domain and condemnation. The City and the county had also completed their negotiations and there was a firm commitment by the county to support the plan. Based on one of the Commission' s findings for denial of the plan, is that adoption of the plan would hinder future relationships with the county. Staff felt that this agreement with the county and their support was important information for the Planning Commission to have. The plan did reconsider these actions of October 16, 1984 and adopted Resolutions 1337 with findings recommending to the .City Council that the Talbert Gap Redevelopment Plan not be adopted. The resolutions was adopted by this following roll call : AYES : Livengood , Schumacher , Mirjahangir , Porter , Erskin . NOES : Higgins. ABSENT: Winchell . ABSTAIN: None (1398d) -2- November 191, 1984 0 The above actions constitute an official record of the City Council 's actions and deliberations in regard to the two proposed Redevelopment Plans. Each of the actions is necessary to complete the process of adopting the Plans. By taking these actions , the City Council makes it possible to complete the adoption of the Redevelopment Plans prior to the end of 1984. If adoption is not completed by then, it may not be possible at all . FUNDING SOURCE: None needed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS : Do not take the recommended actions. In this case , the Redevelopment Plans will probably not be adopted before the new law goes into effect. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Resolutions and ordinances pertaining to the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan 2 . Resolutions and ordinance pertaining to the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Plan. 3. Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area Plan. 4. Report to Council 1. 0 Reasons for Selection of the Project Area 2.0 Description of the Physical , Social and Economic Conditions Existing in the Project Area. 3. 0 Proposed Financing Methods 4. 0 Relocation Plan 5. 0 Analysis of Preliminary Plan 6. 0 Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission 7. 0 Summary of PAC Meetings of Owners and Businesses 8. 0 Conformance with General Plan 9. 0 Environmental Impact Report 10. 0 Report of the County Fiscal Officer 11. 0 Report of the Fiscal Review Committee (if any) (1398d) -3- November 19 , 1984 s � � FA11e1> a-p •�y fj RESOLUTION NO. 97 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING THE FINAL REPORT ON THE PROPOSED TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach that: WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency is in receipt and has consi- dered the final report of the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Plan, the agency authorizes the submission of the aforementioned to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach P44Lft To84L R�46,SD ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City. of Huntington Beach this 19th day of November , 1984 . Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 'XI Y.. Z-9z; Clerk, Redevelopment Agency Agency Counsel psWar%N.\#,^bOr REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator pedal Projec s Coordinator Y AJF:fl 11/13/84 Fq�LtA I t• Res. No. 97 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Qw•1so Tt ��. resolution w& -�dutr opted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 19th November 84 �A�kD day of 19 and that it � sod adepted by the following vote: AYES: Members: Pattinson, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Members: Thomas, Finley, Bailey, Mandic ABSENT: Members: None Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca. yA • �a�leo K-1°t-�`� RESOLUTION NO. 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, an environmental impact report (the "EIR") on the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project (the "Project") was prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seg.) , the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 Ca. Adm. Code Section 15000 et seg.) , hereafter the "State EIR Guidelines") and procedures adopted by the Agency relating to environmental evaluation of public and private projects; and 1 WHEREAS , on September 18, 1984 , the Agency filed a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those agencies which have jurisdiction by law with respect to the Project and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 1984, the Draft EIR was forwarded to other interested persons and agencies, and the comments of such persons and agencies were sought; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies invitin4. comments on the Draft EIR was published in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot on August 4 , 1984; and 1. WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to adopt changes suggested, to incorporate comments received, and the Agency' s response to said comments, and as so revised and supplemented, a Final EIR will be submitted to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach as a part of the Report of the Agency accompanying the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing was held by the Agency and the City Council on November 19 , 1984 , on the Redevelopment Plans and the Final EIR relating thereto, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, and all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto having been heard, and said Final EIR and all comments and responses thereto having been considered; and WHEREAS , the Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR, as revised and supplemented, made a part of the Agency's Report on the Redevelopment Plan, incorporating all comments received and the response of the Agency and the City Council thereto as of the date hereof; NOW, THEREFORE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ._ OF THE CITY OF HUNTIGNTON BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency hereby certifies that the Final Redevelopment Impact Report for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and local procedures adopted by the Redevelopment Agency pursuant thereto, and that the Redevelopment Agency has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report. 2. '= Section 2. The Redevelopment Agency has evaluated all comments, written and oral , received from persons who have reviewed the Draft EIR. Section 3. The Redevelopment Agency hereby finds and determines that the Project will have no significant adverse environmental effects. This finding is based upon the Final EIR and all material contained in the record. Section 4. The Redevelopment Agency approves those mitigation measures set forth in the Final EIR. In the event that, notwithstanding Section 3 of this Resolution, any environmental consequences of the Project are deemed to be adverse, the Redevelopment Agency finds and determines that any such impacts are eliminated or mitigated to insignificance by the mitigation measures set forth in the Final EIR, which measures are incorporated herein by reference. This finding is based upon the Final EIR and' all material contained in the record. Section 5. As to any environmental effects which are not eliminated or substantially lessened, the Redevelopment Agency hereby adopts the following statement of overriding considerations. The Redevelopment Agency hereby finds that, based on the Final EIR and/or other information contained in the record, its action to approve and carry out the Project is supported for the following reasons: a. The Project will eliminate and prevent the spread of blight; provide public improvements and facilities needed to implement the Redevelopment Project Area. b. The Project will have those beneficial impacts identified in the Final EIR, including: 3. il c. Provision of those public improvements set forth in the Plan would enhance the public safety by reducing the risk of catastrophic flooding. Section 6. In the event it is determined that there are significant environmental effects of which are not mitigated or substantially lessened, the Redevelopment Agency hereby finds that, based on the Final EIR and/or other information contained in the record, its action to approve and carry out the Redevelopment Plan is supported for the reasons specified in Section 4 of this resolution. Section 7. Upon approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, the Secretary of the City Council is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of Orange County pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code and the State EIR Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November 1984. Chairman ATTEST: APPRO AS O RM: City Clerk City Attorney 4. E` REVIEWED AND APPROVED: N TIA ED AND APPROVED: •x�9x Ca" City Adrnm,inistratorF Special Projects Coordinator 5. Res. No. 98 y STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution y�adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 19th day of November 19 84 , and that it .was s Vdopted by the following vote: AYES: Members: Pattinson, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Members: Thomas, Finley, Bailey, Mandic ABSENT: Members: Clerk of the Redeve opment• Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca. F*d eD io-il-fi f RESOLUTION NO. 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOUSING OUTSIDE THE IPROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan" ) for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project (the "Project") ; and The Redevelopment Plan provides for the allocation of taxes from the Project Area; and Section 33334 .2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code sections 33000 et seq. ) requires that no oi2 less than 20 percent of all taxes so allocated be used for the purpose of improving and increasing the community' s supply of low- and moderate-income housing available at affordable housing cost; Section 33334. 2 (g) of the Health and Safety Code provides that such funds may be used outside the project area if a finding is made by resolution of the agency and the City Council that such use will .be of benefit to the project, NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find and resolve that the use of taxes allocated from the project area for the purpose of improving and increasing the community' s supply of low- and moderate-income housing available at affordable housing cost outside the project area and in the city of Huntington Beach will be of benefit to the project. 1. 74914D To ge. MaSED ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November , 1984 . Chairman ATTEST: AP PRO D AS TO FORM: Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency Counsel %-%(.'AA' Agency REVIEWED AND .APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: • City Administr o Deputy Director , Redevelopment Y' 2. 1�41RD Res. No. 99 f STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) = ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ) , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hu ington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing #kpff@dresolutior� adopted d by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held ,on the 19th day of November , 19 B4 , and that it *#as so/fade by the following vote: AYES: Members:. lattinson, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Members: Thomas, Finley, Bailey, Mandic ABSENT: Members: None Clerk of the Redevelopment-Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca. • • AoW- a4eo oN RT ORDINANCE NO. 2742 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach has received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach hereinafter referred to as "Agency" , the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert 'Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project, hereinafter referred to as "Project" , as approved by the Agency, a copy of which is on file at the Office of the Agency at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, and at the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, together with the Report of the Agency, including the reasons for the selection of the Project Area, a description of the physical, social and economic conditions existing in the Project Area, the proposed method of financing the redevelopment of the Project Area, an analysis of the Preliminary Plan, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission" , a summary of meetings with property owners and entities interested in the Project Area, an environmental impact report on the Redevelopment Plan, the report of the County Fiscal Officer and the Agency' s analysis thereof, and a neighborhood impact report; and The Planning Commission has submitted to the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach its report and recommendations for not approving the Redevelopment Plan and its certification that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach; and The City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing on November 19, 1984 , on adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and on certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Redevelopment Plan in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California; and A notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Huntington Beach, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and Clerk of the Agency; and 1. Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the last known address of each addressee, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Huntington Beach, of each parcel of land in the proposed Project Area; and Copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the government body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from property in the Project Area; and The City Council has considered the report and recommendations of trig-:.Planning Commission, the report of the Agency, the Redevelopment Plan and its economic feasibility, and the Environmental Impact Report, has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all 'aspects of the Redevelopment Plan; and The Agency and City Council have reviewed and considered the Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Plan, prepared and submitted pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21151 and Health and Safety Code Section 33352 , and certified the completion of said Environmental Impact Report on November 19, 1984 , by Agency Resolution No. and City Council Resolution No. c�g NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area is to accomplish the following: 1. The eliminiation of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others inadequate public improvements. 2. Assisting in the financing, reconstruction and/or construction of flood control improvements and other public facilities. SECTION II. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: 1. The Project Area is a predominantly urbanized area which is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. ) . This finding is based upon the following conditons which characterize the Project Area: (a) Existence of lot or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water. 2 . (b) The existence of properties which suffer from deterioration and disuse because of inadequate public ' improvements, facilities and utilities, including inadequate and insufficient drainage, which cannot be remedied with private and governmental action without redevelopment. (c) The existence of properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration and disuse resulting from faulty planning. It is further found and determined that such conditions are causing and will increasingly cause a reduction and lack to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the City which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone, requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City and the State. This finding is based on the fact that governmental action available to the City without redevelopment would be insufficient to cause any significant correction of the blighting conditions, and that the nature and costs of the public improvements are beyond the capacity of the City and cannot be undertaken or borne by private enterprise, acting alone or in concert with available governmental action. 2 . The Project Area is an urbanized area. This finding is based upon the fact that not less than eighty percent (80%) of the privately owned property in the Project Area has been or is developed for urban uses, as demonstrated by the Agency' s Report to Council. In addition, as demonstrated by the Agency' s Report to Council, the Project Area is part of an area developed for urban uses, such as residential and quasi-public. 3 . The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the Community Redevelopment Law and in the interests of the public peace, health, safety and welfare. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment of the Project Area will implement the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law by aiding in the elimination and correction of the conditions of blight, providing for planning, development, redesign, clearance, reconstruction or rehabilitation of facilities which need improvement, and providing for higher economic utilization of potentially useful land. 4 . The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the fact that under the Redevelopment Plan no public redevelopment activity will be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance those activities to be financed by the agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan; the Agency' s Report to City Council pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33352 further demonstrates the economic soundness and feasibility of the Redevelopment Plan and undertakings pursuant thereto. 3 . 5 . The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. This finding is based on the finding of the Planning Commission that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan . for the City of Huntington Beach. 6. The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan will promote the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the City of Huntington Beach and will effectuate the purposes and policy of the Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based on the fact .that redevelopment will benefit the Project Area by correcting conditions of blight by providing flood control improvements. 7 . No housing facilities are included within the Project Area as to which occupants could be displaced by activities of the Agency. Therefore, the Agency is not required to prepare a precise plan to implement the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area. The Agency recognizes that the provisions of Sections 7260 to 7276 of the California Government Code would be applicable in the event such relocation would occur due to the implementaion by the Agency of the Redevelopment Plan. The City Council finds and determines that the provision of relocation assistance according to law constitutes a feasible method for relocation. 8 . No housing facilities are included within the Project Area as to which occupants could be displaced by activities of the Agency; and no person or family will be required to move from any dwelling unit until suitable replacement housing is available. 9 . There are no noncontiguous areas within the Project Area. 10. Inclusion of any lands, buildings or improvements which are not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the entire area of which they are a part, and any such area is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law without other substantial justification for its inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that the boundaries of the Project Area were chosen on the basis that properties therein are similarly situated with respect to possible flooding or are necessary as potential sites for flood control improvements and whose inclusion is necessary to accomplish the objectives and benefits of the Redevelopment Plan. 11. The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. This finding is based upon 4 . existence of blighting influences, including the lack of adequate public improvements and facilities, and the infeasibility due to cost of requiring individuals to eradicate or significantly alleviate existing deficiencies in public improvements. SECTION III. The provisions of Section 33334 .5 of the Health and Safety Code are applicable. Nevertheless no displacement of residents will be cause by the development plan. SECTION IV. The City Council is convinced that the effect of tax increment financing will not cause a severe financial burden or detriment on any taxing agency deriving revenues from the Project Area. This based upon the analysis contained in the Agency' s Report to the City Council. SECTION V. Written objections to the Redevelopment Plan filed with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach before the hour set for hearing and all oral objections presented to the City Council at the hearing having been considered are hereby overruled. SECTION VI . That certain document entitled "Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project, " the maps contained therein and such other reports as are incorporated therein by reference,. a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, having been duly reviewed and. considered, `.is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part hereof, and as so incorporated, is hereby designated, approved and adopted and the official "Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project. " SECTION VII : In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan hereby approved, this City Council hereby (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Redevelopment Plan, (b) requests the various . officials, departments, boards and agencies of the City of Huntington Beach having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the redevelopment of the Project Area, (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan, and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding necessary to be carried out by the City undertthe provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. SECTION VIII: The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency whereupon the Agency is vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. 5 . SECTION IX. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of Orange County a description of the land within the Project Area and a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the Community Redevelopment Law. SECTION X. The City . Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded by the City Clerk pursuant to Section IX of this Ordinance, a copy of this Ordinance and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Project Area, to the auditor and assessor of the County of Orange, to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which receives taxes from property in the Project Area and to the State Board. of Equalization. SECTION XI. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after passage. f SECTION XII. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Orange Coast Daily Pilot or the Huntington Beach Independent, both of which are newspapers of general circulation for the City of Huntington Beach. SECTION XIII. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or the Redevelopment Plan which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Redevelopment Plan, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance or approved the remainder �•,of the Redevelopment Plan if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1984 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ayzt;-�-� City .Clerk �' City Attorney d- 11 - 6 . REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator uty Directo of Redevelopme 7 . PROPOSED OLBERT- GAP- REDEVELOPMENT- AECT AREA. THE TALBERT GAP PROJECT WILL NOT CAUSE A LIEN TO BE PLACED ON .YOUR PROPERTY WILL NOT TAKE YOUR PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION, EMMINENT DOMAIN OR ANY OTHER MEANS WILL NOT CAUSE YOU TO BE FINANCIALLY LIABLE OR IN ANY OTHER WAY LIABLE FOR PAYING FOR THE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT HINDER YOU IN SELLING YOUR PROPERTY OR MAKING IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY, WILL NOT RAISE YOUR TAXES CHANNEL WIDENING WILL NOT EXCEED EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY, THE TALBERT GAP PROJECT WILL USE REDEVELOPMENT AS A TOOL TO ENABLE THE CITY: 30 ASSIST THE COUNTY IN THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO . IMPROVE THE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS, WILL WIDEN THE INTERIOR OF THE CHANNELS AND LINE THEM WITH CONCRETE, WILL MAKE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE STORM DRAINS AND PUMPING STATIONS , WILL ENABLE THE CITY AND .THE COUNTY TO MAKE SUBSTANTIAL FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN A MUCH SHORTER. "PERIOD OF TIME, THESE FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE PAID. FOR BY THE ADDITIONAL 2% ANNUAL .PROPERTY TAX INCREASE PROVLDED FOR UNDER PROP, 13, WHICH EVERYONE PRESENTLY PAYS, AS WELL AS THE INCREASED TAXES PAID WHEN PROPERTY IS SOLD TO A NEW OWNER, THE-TAXES ARE INCREASED WHEN PROPERTY IS SOLD AS THE RESULT OF A REASSESSMENT OF THE VALUE OF THE .PROPERTY, AS PROVIDED FOR UNDER PROP, 13, J TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOVEMBER 1984 (0132D) TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ERRATA SHEET Section 3:5.6 Financing Limitations on page 12 should read as follows (word changes have been underlined for-ease in understanding): 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.1, and 33334.2 of the . California Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: a) $80,500,0000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan; b) Any amounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community.Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of very low, low or moderate income. -- The time limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be twenty years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. No loans, advances or indebtedness to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the beforementioned Section 33670 shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond such time limitation unless such time limit is extended by amendment of this plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be repaid in whole or in part by the Agency if it chooses to sell bonds, which is within its powers, from the allocation of taxes to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: a) $25 200 000 ($20 168 000 for proposed improvements and $5,042,000 for low and moderate income housing) for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) and debt service; b) And additional amounts paid: 1. By the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and 2. Twenty percent of the amount paid to any taxing agency (set forth in Section 1. above) for Low and Moderate Income Housing (Health and Safety Code Section 41056). (1414d) November 19, 1984 TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUGGESTED CHANGES SHEET Existing.text on page 13 of Plan (see errata sheet): a) $25 200 000 ($20 168 000 for proposed in-1 rovements and $5,042,000 for low and moderate income housing) for all Agency redevelopment activities-in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) and debt service; b) And additional amounts paid: 1. By the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and 2. Twenty percent of the amount paid to any taxing agency (set forth in Section 1. above) for Low and Moderate Income Housing (Health and Safety Code Section 41056). Suggested revision: a) $30,OOO,000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) and debt service; Explanation: The amount of $25,200,000 indicated in the Plan should be changed to $30,000,000 based on a verbal agreement recently made with the County. That agreement increases the City's financial contribution to the County for the purpose of making flood channel improvements. The impact on this figure was discussed by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1984. (1414d) November 19, 1984 TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Project Area Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.5 Duration of the Plan. . 3 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 3 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBI ECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS . . . 3 2.1 General Objectives of the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation and Moving of Public Structures and Facilities 4 2.3.1 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Public Structures and Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3.2 Moving of Public Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4 Acquisition of Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.1 Eminent Domain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.2 . Property Owned by Public Bodies. . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.3 Personal Property. . . . . . . . . . 5 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Building Site Preparation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property . . . . . 6 (0132D) TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D) 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1 Cooperation with City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2 Cooperation with other PublicJ urisdictions. . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4 General Development and Public Improvement Standards and Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4.1 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5 Methods for Project Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5.2 Tax Increments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.5.4 Loans and Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 11 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.5.6 Financing Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Project Area Maps Exhibit B Legal Description Exhibit C List of Proposed Flood Contol Improvements Exhibit D Map of Proposed Flood Control Improvements Exhibit E Map of General Plan Land Uses Exhibit F Distribution of General Plan Land Use Types (0132D) ' TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.0 INTRODUCTION _ 1.1 General The City of Huntington Beach lies at the base of the Santa Ana River floodplain. This floodplain has been identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers as the "greatest flood threat west of the Mississippi River." The Santa Ana River Channel originates at Prado Reservoir in Riverside County and terminates at the.Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. A federal project for improving the Santa Ana River Channel has been in the planning stages for nearly 20 years. When the project is approved, Huntington Beach and the other affected cities and counties will be responsible for providing much of the funding. Apart from the Santa Ana River Channel, the City also utilizes an interlocking system of flood control channels and pumping stations which are distributed throughout the City. During the winter storms of 1983, it became apparent that the existing flood control system is inadequate to protect the City from flooding. Flood control channel failures in several locations resulted in the flooding of homes and streets in the City. Analysis of the cause of the channel failures has revealed the need for substantial improvements to several components of the flood control system. The areas where needed improvements are necessary have been included within the Project Area boundaries. The City's adopted General Plan contains policies for maintaining and improving flood control in the City. This Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project was prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of .California, Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et s_�, the California Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Talbert Gap Flood Control Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council.and as thereafter amended. This Redevelopment Plan is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1984. 1.2 Definitions The following definitions will govern in the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise indicated in the text. "Agency" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington Beach, California or any successor in interest. "City" means the City of Huntington Beach, California. "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "County" means the County of Orange, California. (0132D) -1- "Flood Control Improvements" means improving flow and capacity along existing flood d control channels; rehabilitating pump stations, storm drains and bridge culverts; and creating retention basins as set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "C," and list of improvements attached hereto as Exhibit "D." "Legal Description" means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared in accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". "Map" means the Project Area Map for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." "Person" means any individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Privately-Owned Real Property" means real property owned by some person or entity other than a governmental or other public agency. "Project" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Project Area" means the area included within the boundaries of the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "B." "Public Facilities" means any facilities owned by a public agency. "Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et sea..), as amended to date. ._ "State" means the State of California. "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency in the manner provided by Sections 33670 to 33677, inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Law and Article XVI, Section 16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The legal description of the Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit 11B " 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. (0132D) -2- The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such remedies may include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisions which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run in perpetuity and except for repayment of indebtedness (which repayment may extend beyond the life of the plan), the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 20 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBI ECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Objectives of the Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and in particular those areas within the City which have become blighted because of deterioration, disuse, and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area. Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: -- Providing a safe and sanitary environment for the existing and future housing stock within the City of Huntington Beach. -- Assisting the County to mitigate a flood hazard which affects the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. -- Assisting the County to provide adequate public improvements, public facilities and utilities in the form of a flood control system which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. -- Assisting the County to implement the construction of adequate flood control facilities to ensure proper vehicular and pedestrian access within and around the Project Area during periods of heavy rain. -- Establishing other flood control facilities within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices. -- Providing a procedural and financial mechanism by which the Agency can assist, complement and coordinate revitalization and enhancement of the community. (0132D) -3- -- Eliminating existing blighted conditions and the prevention of recurring blight in and about the Project Area. -- Encouraging community involvement and citizen participation in the adoption of policies, programs and projects so as to ensure that the Redevelopment Plan is implemented in accordance with the objectives and goals of the General Plan. -- Encouraging the coordination, cooperation and assistance of other local agencies as may be deemed necessary, to ensure that projects undertaken by this Agency are implemented to their fullest and practical extent. -- Other actions as appropriate, including but not limited to, actions to assist in the rehabilitation of flood channels and related facilities, and the encouragement of coordination and cooperation among local implementing agencies and residents. To achieve the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency is authorized to undertake the following implementing actions: -- Development of adequate public improvements and facilties. -- Demolition, clearance and site preparation of publically-owned property. -- Assist in providing financing for flood control improvements in the Project Area. 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants The Agency acknowledges the requirements of California Redevelopment Law, Sections 33339 and 33339.5. However, they are not applicable in this project because the construction of flood control improvements within the Project Area will not result in the need for participation of owners and tenants. 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation and Moving of Public Structures and Facilities 2.3.1 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Public Structures and Facilities The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve or to cause to be rehabilitated any publically-owned building, structure or facility in the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized and directed to encourage in the rehabilitation of property in the Project Area not owned or acquired by the Agency. (0132D) -4- 2.3.2 Moving of Public.Structures As is necessary in carrying out :this Plan and where it is economically feasible to. do so, the. Agency is authorized in its discretion to move or cause to be moved any !publically-owned structure, building or facility which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area-and dispose of such structures in conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2.4 Acquisition of Property Except as specifically exempted herein, the Agency may, but is not required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase or any other lawful method. 2.4.1 Eminent Domain The Agency shall not use eminent domain to acquire any privately?-owned real or personal property. 2.4.2 Property Owned By Public�Bodies The Agency is not authorized by law to acquire real property owned by public bodies which'do not consent to-such acquisition. 2.4.3 Personal Property Personal property shall not be acquired by the Agency. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants The Agency acknowledges that as a Public Agency, it is bound by . California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Section 7250 et seq ). However, it is not applicable in this -project because the construction of flood improvements within the Project Area will not result in any displacement. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Site Preparation Except for privately-owned real property, the Agency is authorized to demolish and clear or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property, in the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or cause to be installed and constructed, temporary public improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public improvements snay include: but.are not limited to traffic signals, streets, flood control facilities, •and utilities. Temporary utilities may be installed above ground. The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or pay all or part of the value of, or to cause to be installed and constructed with the consent .of• the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the public improvements. and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the Plan and to pay for part or all of the value therefore, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such .public improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and (2) no other• reasonable means of. financing such (0132D) -5- public improvements are available to the Community. Such public improvements may include, but are not limited to, recreational improvements, landscaping, utility undergrounding, pedestrian walkways, over or under passes, bridges, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, flood control improvements, traffic signals, electrical distribution systems, water distribution systems, parks and playgrounds. Specifically, the Agency may pay for, install or construct, and may acquire or pay for the land required therefore, the facilities, buildings, and structures set forth in Exhibit "D" Proposed Flood Control Improvements, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Agency is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property in the Project Area owned by the Agency. When the value of such land or the cost of the installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both has been or will be, paid or provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimburse the.City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both by periodic payments over a period of years. If in implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, in accordance with all of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for Uses in Accordance with this Plan For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of Agency-owned real property within the Project Area by leases, trades, or sales by negotiation without public bidding. The foregoing shall be controlled by the limitations contained in Section 2.4 of this Plan. All real property acquired by the Agency in the Project shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted in the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. For property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency, an annual report concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of Agnecy property for speculative purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. (0132D) -6- All purchasers or lessees of Agency property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of. restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All Agency property in the Project Area is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. As required by State and Federal law, all property sold, leased, or conveyed, shall be made expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses. To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement within the Project Area for itself or for any public body or entity to the extent that such improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development in the Project Area is proceeding in accordance with disposition and development documents and time schedules. For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of real property owned by the Agency except property conveyed to it by the City of Huntington Beach. 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Cooperation with City Subject to the limitations of this Plan and any limitation in law, the City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City shall include but are not necessarily limited to the following: -- If necessary, institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way within the Project Area. Such action by. the City may include the (0132D) -7- abandonment and relocation of public utilities in the public rights-of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. -- Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements in publicly-owned public utilities and community facilities within or affecting the Project Area. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. -- Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. -- Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of all conceptual plans and substantial amendments to said plans pertaining to new development, and flood control improvements in the Project Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to any required application approval by the City. -- The City is authorized, but not obligated to provide and expend funds to ensure the completion of the project as a whole in accordance with this Plan. The obligation of the City to perform the actions indicated in this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described in Section 1.4 hereof, be contingent upon the continued availability of funding for this project primarily from tax increment revenues as defined in Method for Financing herein. In the event that such funds, at any time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this project, the obligation of the City shall thereafter be limited to providing assistance in the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead costs in connection with the termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced pursuant to this Plan. -- The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project. 3.2 Cooperation with Other PublicJ urisdictions Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, is not authorized to acquire real property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. The Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in the Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or (0132D) -8- leases property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges. of owner and tenant participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. The Agency may enter into agreements with the County of Orange, pursuant to which the County shall construct flood control improvements for the benefit of the Agency, and the Agency will make payment therefore to the County. The obligation of the Agency to make such payment to the County shall be deemed to constitute indebtedness within the meaning of Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code. During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its, disposition for redevelopment. . 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those residential, commercial, industrial, and public uses illustrated, as amended from time to time, in the General Plan of the City. Those land use designations of property within the Project Area are attached hereto as Exhibit E. The distribution of general land uses by percentage of the Project Area occupied is depicted in Exhibit F. Refer to the General Plan as now in effect, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk at 2000 Main Street in Huntington Beach and is available by reference. -- Public Uses, Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way and Easements The flood channel rights-of-way, principal streets and other public rights-of-way that may require improvements as proposed for the Project Area are illustrated in Exhibit C and listed in Exhibit D. Flood channel rights-of-way, streets and other rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the Agency and the City. as necessary for proper flood control design, development, circulation, and access. Additional public rights-of-way streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency and the City within or outside the Project Area as needed for proper flood control design, circulation and access, provided property to be acquired is not privately-owned, unless such owner requests in writing such acquisition. -- Semi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses The Agency is authorized, subject to the limitations established in Section 2.4 of this Plan, to permit the establishment. or enlargement of public, semi-public, institutional, or nonprofit uses, including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, fraternal, employee . institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, if allowed by the Agency, shall conform so far as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses in the specific area involved. The Agency shall impose such .other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. 3.4 General Development and Public Improvement Standards and Requirements All real property shall be : developed and rehabilitated in conformance with all applicable state and local laws, fire, building, housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach as they presently exist or may hereinafter be amended. (0132D) -9- 3.4.1 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, if it deems appropriate, is authorized to finance this project with assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, property tax increments, interest revenue, income revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, the lease of Agency-owned property, the sale of Agency-owned property, or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. The City may supply advances and expend money as necessary to assist the Agency in carrying out this project. Such assistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 3.5.2 Tax Increments Tax increment financing may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project assessed valuation base will be established in accordance with state law as described herein. Any tax increments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the increment by itself or from the sale of tax allocation bonds allows. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows: -- That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property in the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid . (For the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory is annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange last equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the project on said effective date). (0132D) -10- -- That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of amourit discussed in preceeding paragraph shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed; or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, this redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project as shown on the' last equalized assessment roll, all .of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and. interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the project shall be . paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. -- That portion of taxes discussed in the preceeding paragraph are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the incurring of any indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or in part the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project. -- The Agency is authorized to incur indebtedness and to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and bonded indebtedness contained in this Subsection. 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes The Agency may issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be issued only after the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, available to repay principal and interest when due and payable. In any case, the issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds nor property owners within the project area are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable.for them, nor in any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 3.5.4 Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the United States, or any other public or private source will be utilized, if available, as the Agency deems appropriate to its corporate purposes. (0132D) -11- 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may, but is not required to, in any year during which it owns property in a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exempt, an amount of money in lieu of taxes. The Agency may also, but is not required to, pay to any taxing agency with' territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which in the Agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the project. 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.1, and 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: Fa) $25,200,000 ($20,168,000 for proposed improvements and $5,042,000 for low and moderate income housing) for all Agency .redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan; b) Any amounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing . agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of very low, low or moderate income. -- The time limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be twenty years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. No loans, advances or indebtedness to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the beforementioned Section 33670 shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond such time limitation unless such time limit is extended by amendment of this plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be repaid in whole or in part by the Agency if .it chooses to sell bonds, which is within its powers, from the allocation of taxes to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: (0132D) -12- a $80,500,000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) b) And additional amounts paid: 1. By the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and 2. Twenty percent of the amount paid to any taxing agency (set forth in Section 1. above) for Low and Moderate Income Housing (Health and Safety Code Section 41056). -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low income households as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: -- That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income or very low income households; or -- That some stated percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to meet such housing need; or -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. (0132D) -13- EXHIBIT A PRO]ECT AREA MAPS (0132D) C , ZONING INDEX MAP .3 DM 9 b II _ LEGEND 19-6-1D-SECTIDN-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 16 -II .. 15 -II 14-, 11 p. DM 22-b&RICT MAP 22 DM 18 DM 17 D 15 i \5-I 19-5-II -S-IIs. w 21- -11 22-5-11 -5-11 24 i. 2 DM DM 21 DM D 4 bull 25 `5 DM 27 LL30 5-iL r 6 -11i- /Dli� 35 D�134 ��"Kf DM32 M31 D 0 �a 'Ei32-51,11 33-5711 J-5-11-1 -11 38 i 4O i? 5-6-II CITY._ OF 9[S M6-I 3- -i1 O21 F4 -11 1 . Akr::::2u:' :• >: f>< s. .<. 56-10 6 DMbM4 DM3 - -11 -10I 0 8-6-10 10 D 12 N 7 'OM -6-10:i 17 � 1 DM19 HUNfiNGTON 6EACHN. - X ORANGE COUNTY '6UV bk!A 24-6-I 19�' .•�0 �a. DM 29 �DOM[O YfNU,LD,HY KYNIYO.COY IY!610Y.11[!O W f ION cm cwwnt-MOIYUICE W.itLa - -1- Grp_ „ft„�I,Y,q K KYf•�gMn,Yn �- VINUTY MAP . 191 L 't1� Ild `-1 — NCs,:- 11_-ma +a pll »� 'IN�E 1 ��q' �.•� {/.—._j��W11pp�11Y�` q1 yYINIYnyZ=-i - � c '�.�+--r. .- ■i• C—I tld11g1 11�1 �11 HNmnM CS- �pNlnp wl 111 NIIW IINMpQ m■� • t` �r'-Gnnl Tpl. ice!. •I.1 Ydn��Y �d gun IM111- x - •1\I r nu JFo. - WIp1\ pmlml�� � -11■� Iljxj?IminllWdml � •�11�'�I'1■p1--IIIV■1��-pOgl11N11■p� •. 1■N-NNMII I uTu�pimmmon � I S ai ruin CC Imnn��pllNl��t —���IIxIUN%I NmmY� f� ��B>aBB n1■�= ji=r�,i riinw' INN N1 (� `I 11.5�` '- �m1� ��G•'�� �� IIII 1111nI111N4101111,1�1__ _���=1p111■'j�,••i'1'�'_f. - � i 1 �• a *- n IW; C NINI ■x■■1 �I 1■InN IIp L,y 7' S•._ _ T � Iunm�'uro i� i:da9� �C�ti. 'aR'■v� ji _I,q�1/Q�1�� _I_ sq 3 . wlle�a ..1_ s �31u■mnu7 �.=� 1i -No: xl�wuq Bill _ + s 'FFFFIIm•11 .f e�i: NI Iq pp/M a -'^r. � -9 � ter.. � tJ� �'� xnnw■ ��'p1»�i p�_ Io ■ � •�i `pIuwla � nm • c e n u�n :I�- a ��''`'' �► � mrll�ff��P 1 11 1 O1 I . 'NiNN���• �� /a{1.�i,•' n M�'"�►.�.�i�m } _ y �`Mqjob �Ix • ..m.y a 4 Y � ''' ���`�1I�'1 '.1 it fit i ': E. i 11 :»\N m•pw»'mm•m■�'•7�a.Jws•\mamin'd " r7[' r C � � '� � dId ■IMd10 11 c w Itmm n � � ���� � �1 ate. ■■y• �,nnm�'�a n� ���t8 u�. `�Im■'•1»ia- _ I aimRMIJM _aunt 8 Ey+ -q�Iro1W11 -' 1�I■Ilgy �' �� IISIWI¢�¢■�T C- • 1" �I m11■ %If:Nmm11__ ,•`��'`��fj� �;II!I�.g i=� � C -4 -qm�1 .1 �- �r1 sT• r 9 II rollwldw•• _ -{ •. r I�. Ti q are to Mlr,- _ T �qq C►.uwu xnun� ,'�I ��4�Sa I 1� `r o y Ij 1 c n �xm mnw�._• v�vM ��3�!�• A _ � I � w � ice= F Y �,,,i ". � Ids Qftumnn■nx� Nui-`-.SS a xin '' :1■\I■I�-ii��Tim if■ ..1%� %IN�I x1.NC�-�■1� a{■p� b� ��1�! �1�N■y,�T lii�.l n enNu�nn' �lII� 'j3TTi •y•• r r ..nn�h nw� ••••y•.q �.ap� 111111���uia NMI � _ PLANNING ZONING DIM 40 Iwo SECTIONAL DISTRICT . MAP 36-5-IIK, NOTE CITY OF ADOPTED DUNE 20, 1960 I j 1.1 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 771 LEGEND; -•:.9 AMENDED ORD.N0. AMENDED ORD,NO, ®SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE D13TRICT HLJNTI (NGTON BEACH 5-21:162 903 2-8-67 1361 ®MO4LE MA.DISTINCT ICT d-7-1992 90D 5-IS'67 1321 D4 MOxMAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 5-7 1962 903 II-25-67 1321 ®RACE PROFESSpNAL DISTINCT 6-19-1962 900 5-.-67 1318 ® LIMITED WILTPLE FArIY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT I-21-196 940 11-2-70 1611 ® TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT -1- am - TVFT �O3�ci l�TRIDT -iO-1964 lose 72 17 PLANNEDDFI [xrn 5-18-1964 103 q-6-72 T85ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 4-5-1965 1132 1-7.74 95 O _ AMENDED 9Y ZONE CASE: 3-21-1966 1192 2-3-75 re1860 _.._ FRONT Yuro SETSACN LIKE 4-21-1975 1975 5-19-75 1982 205,23T,239.250.297.388,431.505.546,66-58 D¢m,PREDSE PLAN OF STREET ALAINMENY 7-8-1976 2078 Sig-75 1891 --_ �STREET 6T-10,368,PP 67-1,69-36,71-28,72-27,PP72-7,74-21,TS-25,T4-4,7N-13,76-6,76-1D.77-25, 6-21-1978 20T2 II-21-1977 2240 P6 P! PS!O TALBERT AVENUE I L !oo RI W 3 RI so. RI. gRCF—E I�'4 c REST v:2Ascla+a RYRI RI w RIN NO RISTERLING 3AVENUERIMR , N; RI RI RI1. RI—PDT u N1 ER A TUNER AV RI RI if TAYL:R DR LE ONTE DR. RI = a R2 s RI RI — RIRI-PD `✓I ,I� MCY w.� RI aN R3 R3 RI C4 R3 R R3 `: j � l /DMi1Y.D l 0 . R2 RI l RI—P "D 2 iRI R21 R2 nE RI i�l, a]:F'u7?--i�MlxA�oL -- R3 i R3 _ C4 I R3 R R3 R2 R2 3 ` R3 MH R3 i RAZ' R3 MeR3 ---------- C/1 R2" R3 ' WM60P 't R3 R3OR 3 �t3 � RI CONSTANTINDR R1 6 RI R2 R2 R 3 T �134 R3 . RI o 34D'- RI a R-1 m R2 R2 RI xE RI (R I� 1 �1 GARFIELD r )s!e AVENUE a PLANNING ZONING- = DM I SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP -- NOTE ADOPTED JUNE 20.1960 ALL.1-510..3.RE IN FEET CITY O F o'A.E ADT .1 _ D N. ENTER CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 770 's'N c—To E.*ENONr THE c RIc�* o w - AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD..NO• LEGEND. 834 1-20-69 1465 HUNTINGTON BEACH - 932 -71 1657 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 5-7-62 900 9-15-75 2011 yOj LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 10-15-82 932 7-':-75 1989 1-21-63 942 5-7-79 2368 E�E'COMMLNI TY FAC'LIT IES IE DUCATIDN i 0151 RICT 6-3-63 969 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(RECREATION)DISTRICT I2-2-63 1021 04. HroIIw4r coMMER014L ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 615-6 027 G -6-6 4 102 RA RIGNWAYEVDEATI C MRICVLTUR4L DISTRICT 12-�ti4 1106 0 COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 4-4-66 ISO SUFFIX LEGEND 122,148,150''51,153,164,237,269,285,316,376,372,444,482,66-3,66-32,66-37,66-62, 8-15-66 1243 PJ-3-66 1259 68-44.71-12.74-16,75-5.79-5, I_16-67 1290 COMBINED WITH DIL PRODUCTION sETBACK LINE GARFIELD ; 1 AVE. i3( LR2 SRI �RE,TW OR RI o RI f R-PD RI MANOEv..E DR. RI J RI °1 RI A Rl RI>J_ N 1 w MOLAss DRRIDEAUv LE OR. I LLU= RI �GRIC4 330 �RIICF-��_ � 1 RI J y I kI RI 1= b PEN CR RI WHITE54R5 CR. FRAN I N O3 V_wbl TR„ RI 1 RA q ELGI d RI� CF-E RI 11 RI I RI rl R` I J ,. DN ., NF.ELU CR y $D Lg R (f`ER:t-!S�'!;!::tt.l I KEEL L: �Pl�_ Lu55 DR J 1 RTMO TR '^ Z 00 j RI I RI R - R I i Pto 1 I - -- 1 R4 a 4: a R I s:a;:.•: FLLWUTN DH L N 1 :':84•_-_ RI RI RI z 1 RI R: J ��� POR OR N C'r-R HE.JK CRESCENT JDAG u-.RANT Ofl IO6 R I _.. SHNCdHAL� Il RI I RI I 1 OACAPULCO RI n. IJ sE�S R4Y oR. J1 I Reu R HAYES CR R l m I RI R I RI RI I� RI 3T W =RlRI I 1 w RI Y LORRAINE OR. B4rwoo0 v I I I3 HAM R TYLER CR ; DANBURY C CR ; RI RI R L—JI W Ai R I R I ' RI ' _ PALLERMO RI i 1 w g w RI POLK CR Z Q GILFORD CR 1 RI Iy RI RI p RI Itgp g GK RI a 3 RI 1 BmoNnE D9. 541LPoRT 0R V 5l0 TO SEC LHE LR' RI ��1 -----1 YORNTOWN RI ¢ RI RI = RI L _k — R5 No•12'3WWI2ue'E RI RI 9 RI 3 R ` T w LAKE DR ALBATROSS DR. .95.4B' �,°, 31� -I R I R I R I f(R2 FF4 y CE RAI CR RERRE DR. RE CR. {2Y6•'126•E RI `(` 1 3 R 1 RI _ J R I R•so10000. i 4De--J RI I 1M.m.o+ RI COMPTON OR. CR L.94.60- i" RI I RI 1 p RI a R I R•62700• I WIN CF—E ,9965' 1 ( ..:::is S' �) j 3 � � nE D 1 RI w F-° 0 BREAKERS DR. R•23 oa ¢¢ _ 0 .•3]64' U i Ne9.22'41'W RI I ; N RI R , R I 2T.OD 11 C Lj a,400 oy'. I j NURSE DR. RI I BOI DR DOLPHIN 7j DR CR V �•330_L' /• R•500.0'._.. 1. L•z.5co4 RI� RI RIJRI , RI RI RI J RI RI i I }, 1 EPVIEw DOREMERE m DR CUTTER RA R a /i ,^/ 1 W 00..I j e RI I RI 1 J RI RI o IRANK I DALLAS CR I EL LME AD DR i IFFir I RI-- I I If RI I RI RI WWI f "WOswLE — 0R I RI IIvY cR. I Mo o D DR 3 I 1 RI I RI RI RI R I CLIPPER DR. RI 1 Ris o3 <) , R•KXIL W -•1 RI/ FLAN44N DN. L— ' j L•3ttoa'< / �� j�$ IjS vCLNEr CR. i a LARKPORT RI RI RI I Y Uj RI 3 Im RI dv RI 4 < �$ C2 I �O N0•Ii B w $ � Q4RKWLE d. 1 OWMEAD DR W t f I—.. 24500 3I I l RI ; RI f-AMS AVE. 6 , 2 T pLANMNG ZONING DM 13 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 12-6 -11 0� SLALE IN FEET NOTE ADOPTED AUGUST 15.1960 — DIMENSKH.S ARE IN FEET CITY OF CITY COUNCIL-ORDIN4NCE N0.785 pNr ZONE ADJOINING ANr RIGHT a<ENTER AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED JRD.NO. O INTENOED TO EXTEND To THE CENTER 2-6-61 e!a 8-7-72 1767 of suCH RIGHT OF •Ar 5-5 61 839- 8-6-73 1862 LEGEND: 12-4-61 877 7-7-75 1994 5-7-62 900 6-6-77 2190 OtALEED CL4SSftCeT" PLANNE NT WT HUNTINGTON BEACH y 3-62 S'_3 12-13-76 245 SINGLEDDEVELOPYEDENCE DISTRICT I-21-63 94B 3-16-'a 2356 LEI NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 6-3-65 969 12-3-79 2405 ® SINGLE f4111LY RENOENCE DISTRILT 2.3-64 1034 4-5-82 2546 cE COYYUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT 8-19-64 1079 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 7.63 11 J6 SF-R COMMUNITY FACILITIES(AECREATIONALI DISTRICT 6-4-65 1145 Q NWH—COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 65 �t NOW D—H.i...—ppp—imote II-3-65 117 CT-g COMMUNITY FACILITIESIEDUCATIONI DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 1-3-66 1177 tesoErrtuL wRIaLTtwAL DISTRICT RlIG baea4pnthe4pprove4 site I-16-67 1290 145,161,213.215.237.261,300,316,394.461,482.514.531,540.66-62,66-66 DIOM. A—wecilkplon 6-19-67 1330 SUFFIX LEGEND: 67-22.70-10,71-11,71-12,71-34,PP72-5.73.12,75-04,77-6.78-22,79-1,79-9,81-15, w ill be submiti.d with the 9-IB-67 1349. D,.DI, finpl trOtt map. 10-19-7U 15v'fi .DZFW a_ca.6NIN0 DISTRICTIt 7-17.71 I6'9 -----:: DENOTES PRIVATE STREETS 9-7-71 1657 _.._ SETBACK LINE 1 12-20-71 1702 ADAMS II AVE I L 34 1 2 T RI 1 PC4 *SEABRIDGE I= HDRTHPORT DR 1 RI tR SPECIFIC 1 RIr s PLAN mRI , RI RI RI RI 1 - 1. 1 RI E CR LRIfRImRI e o HeAr cR ; NAXTox vsccuNr R I J RI N 1 f DR 1 " 01 RI RI I RIKEs^G g� RE °A J RI 1 RI MILLBRI CR ; RI RI 1 Riq RI 1 R I 1 R I FK-NIGNVS fA. DR _ 1 R I I ! MEDIE E 1 -DI . - C u NDRFOLN °R. 1 KELSO DR. 8 R I RI RI DR p @Y m RI o RI I RI RI SOUYFS CR. DA SANT G DR p 1 = P NEWBURY R. 1 LL WBTER R I RI 11j11 RI T.RI % El W v3 1 1 RI I 1 IF R I M DR.3 BURLCaesT DR N DP. 1 SO L RI : RI RI 1 I RI 1. sEA RocK& 1 RI CF-E HEHTON OR. 6i G B RI z O 1 (MO -) 1 _ RI -RI1 M4 RI RI RI Cf SEAPORT DR_J ; OR J Q J BEDEL DR. IC2 �Rs 4 J RI RI _ ;-IL J RI { RI 1 ; ' m 3 W EEuest R a DR J 1 RI TRUX ON DR IG e„aIE RI J z RI QRI RI; RI RI 5 RI :aC_F-Rx) �o4VBYDR� Rla RI �RI ALLOY DR i RI ; RI RI JI TOT R I R I R I 1 j CHARFORD DR. n NFORDO OR. B o RI I RI - RI I RI RI RI RI ' AVE �I INDI4NAPOLI6 1 RI c RI RI z RI - CI I `. RI 8R1FTw000 D •.p,+ R I RI R I 1 -%": ) i Rl REILLY DR 1 1 .%y :,.'S. D F—E J J RI 1 RI R R1 TERN CR 1 RI •L 1 i(E'�y RI ) I PF:TER:i"N'S(',Nl.fil.J _ 1 't' -•'S' 1' IL SA CR. RI ,R I -'$...:. RI RI RI 7y RI HERON CR IDC . RI ;. RI 4 r a CRANE CR 1 '66[.E�.+i...� :_: _ J\ -tN�•'' ,..� _ / ....-_. CR __R I_—. W q 1 r s R R RI KINGFISHER cR i ~':'.:''• r -• \1 1 eIFI C4 R I I` / R I j RI 1 1 5 = R i 1 E ----- ART M CR pPAS=_ 1 i fc9tJ-_<�.. ,.:'/g.. X• �i S Z r! O i RI r RI $ RI RI 1 _. - f, u RI SEAR Rp CR ALVARADo w 0R 1 @ } R2-PD RI = I EVELVN CR G+':.LIpN D' - :. ``�•P I'� X•n:---__ a a RI .r R1RI� "'}'- ,;: r j=i';• e10: i`_ 1 m i u Now&Ro a _r _ DR 3 l•J .R I :fir:"'%•,_ _ i-�`---------•-'+ loo ,� a RI RI RI C4 Z &I `-R1 RI r ` Ri R g1 C4 r- Ie!Ie •�"N� �� ATLANTA - AVE- PLANNING ZONING DM 12 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP II-6-II LEGEND: ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 O CITY OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0 754 �. AMENDED�ORDNO AMENDED CASE ORIONp ® OU4LIFED CLASSFICATON ]-20�0 114 TSfi A.,_ To-T 9!0 �0.0TOAM SPECIFIC RAN 6 19-61 17l 847 6 -75 T5-T Iwo �, YOBILENOME DISTRICT II-6-61 n' 0T6 05-75 73.3C ZOO. � PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 5-7-62 Zll ROD 9-R-TS TOWNLOF2013 0.1-C2 266 929 ONNLOT2020 1P L7 SIHOLE FA RESIDENCE DISTRICT 12-3-62 262 93B MnT-6-T6 70.3 208D TWO FAMILY RESIOENCE DISTRICT -3-B3 312 9S2 9-ITS 1-D 2111 LIMITED MULTIPLC FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACHA 19 63 J4T 996 3 T 76E3 2152 -•-65 484 (III 4-Ma7 OLOTDWN2IT Q MULTIPLE fAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT I-17-86 S36 IIBO 2-B-76 77-20 2269 ® GENERAL BU51NE4S DISTRICT 1 5-66 11, Ii:26 54561 122a7 T1E 2243 2 O ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IO-l-68 66.41 I_ 2-21-TB 77-32 2268 COMMWITY FACILITIES(RECREATIONAU DISTRICT <-6-67 67-5B 1361_116 I T-T2 77-18 2333 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(EDUCATIONALIDISTRICT "IT-67 67-5 I31fi 12-IBaB TB-IB Z2" ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9-1-69 fiB-39 6) a-Zo,q Pt9 B32 09 ® OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT )-21-69 fig-M 1411 2-•-GO PPT9.2241• Qi'.E COMMUNITY BUSINE55 D15TRICT 8-4-89 69-IS 1515 I-21-RD PPT9-42412 �41 NIGNWIY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 0-20-70 69-33 15T2 )-6-BI BI-5 249! DESIGNATES PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 7-6-M PPTO-2 IM4 -21-80OLDCNE241D- IO-I9-7D 10-10 606 q1pp-IT-BgelS3 03-2A WW 521-T9fY-71 v]ro]-IfiI l0i1-9J — 28- �)OOMBWED WITH OIL PRODUCTION 1-6-71 71-10 I686BB55 --- SETBACK LINE r ,] 2_ 2.4-71 T2-3J i19� I'a".7' fAYB1NE0 WITH 01L PRODUCTION C2 ^ B So-4 72-45 1817 IN AREA BOUNDED BY PALM, r AVE.ON WE,SEVENTEE NTH ST. D111 I` ADAMS AVE. ON NW,OCEAN AVE.ON SW,/ L� _ . j U L_JI�J LJ�J U 1 11 1 ��I I I la SEIENTH ST ON eE.I /L 211/9 RI-Q RI-0 RIR-I F R-I R-1 R2 I! 4---'-W,Dff4 (0)OLDr 30C2 R2 C4' -0 SPECIFIC LAN �LOMA AVE PORTLAND AVE _BI."i.•!: .. .�i.l 4'4�`32 RI .Q �.Q PORTL4ND cR (DISTRICT 2) .T_Q >g o t RI H HRIHrlli�RlR2 �� _0 ,I. e3o ji ; GO RI.O 8 OSWEGO AVE. pvE. R2-PD-10 � -0k TH10.TEENTH I N !lOTi CF-E RI RIn � o o -o -0 -o I (: ::Ted 1� � �� 3 !,R2•PD-10 fsTR . RI RI �6 RI N AS HVILLE AVE. IiO A D - ST L SPECIFIC I R2-PD IO yK R I RI rwELFt�C F-R -a PLAN(DI RICT TWO) I -�.- ^ I R 1 12s R2-PD-10 -- y (:•inR^ ?AR<) E El- VEN7N 5T. m Rl IN Ha 00,100CF_R RI nL LN AV .I R3 C4 RI O RI �IJ I I 1 R rENiN a C, I RI R2 R2 RI KNOX VILLE AVE. Rl S CI IC 3 L N �a R3 R3 ^ R3 CA TOWNLOT SPECIFIC 8 R 2 +o I r RAN AREA ORE r f. (SECTION'S') O JI"I.'I AVE. ' r—'. c 1 • y R3 R2 R2 .1r �3 1 I Tr (� ` aR3 R3 :R3B E( �� � _ y INC:ANAPO- q� R3�R3 I�^�II 110 IIII'�II',InL OI I _T Ell I I�! D ry AV Of Q HAN-FORD AVE. . a GE� 11 I �f O(`� AVE. Ho ED -L'•� �1'v y1 Vp FRANKFORT ro • s� F FSN _ - LL \ \ ELMIRA 50- i'` -PECAN AVE ° MH i Z ( DETROIT *C/ Q y� j {r rP W e '`\•'�L HICADO I��Z�a I CHICAGO�(�O��AVE VR2-P a IF, uj D 0 a�LJz �! •; 9 ti pr I BALTIMORE AVE 1 o R2 PD,� R2-PD��R2-PDi�aj c/l �y o y Lf\ , &�Qh� =0 ar XG I N "" I, ."" .42I R2 _ lE-�wC -i `ST Cii• TO q e / R2-D R2-PD J � U 1 -AT LANTA i o 1000 AVE 14 SCALE IN FEET • IJ / NOTE \ ALL DIMENSIONS 44E IN FEET ANY ZONE ADJOINING ANY RIGHT OF WAY (1OT p. 15 INTENDED TO EXTEND�TO THE CENTER S// \ OF SUCH RIGHT OF WAY PLANNING ZONING DM 16 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-6-11 -- NOTE: CITY OF DIUCNS10x5 ARE IN FEET v CONE W. NG Aur GMH OP AY 5 IN'ONE }O E-YTENL TO E CENTER ADOPTED MARCH 7,1880 of wcx R16NT OF WAY. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LEGEND yj P90vE5510hAL, MOTEL,TRCI--ER PARK DST-1 AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. � LIMITED MULTIPLE EAl— RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH ® COMMUNITY FACOD COMMERCIAL DISTRIIORMIL)CT DISTRICT 8-7-82 900 =1 SHORELINE D•STRICT 12-3-62 936 'Z1] GENERAL wSINESS DISTRICT - 9-20-65 1158 LC� NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 3-6-67 1304 CL� NIGHWAY COYYERIC AL DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 6-13-67 1334 ® COMBINED WITH O:L PRODUCTION 7-3-87 1339 SETBACK LINE _ 7- 84 -01 COMBINED WITH OIL PRODL'TION 6-7V 15 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE; o-19-7C0 1606 ® DESIGNATES PRECISE PLAN OE STREET ALIGNMENT 237,281.524,66-68.67'13.67-14.PP70-2,PP70-3,70-IC,PP76-4,76-11,77-3"0;79.B,62-8, }21.79-P-}6�-7t 236oie" DIIJ TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 6-7-76 2069 ® PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 12-19.77 2253 7OlL PRECISE PLAN dF STREET ALIGNMENT I-7-80 24019 :::::: PRNATE STREET /y Q II-1-62 2581 ® MOBILE HOME DISTRICT �2 1 I, ATLANTA STREET , l.� '> ", c y P� f R 3 ?aAg Lp?- R2-PD I 1 ,1 G�EY Iv •1 R2-PD _.!IGYLATACC--- ,i ; , 1 1 { o'S+'Y"G-t--".V0.i6j .-R2-PD e MH Rz=PD; _ 1. R CF-CI e.2 0 R5 R2-PD i I', R2-PDml m O �- PD j�lw R2-PD :'`I R2-PD 1 •," 4Ci,LN �' MrlL� R2-om PD R2-PD 1 J -Ex MH MH-0 MH-0 ca1.0 'p 4 CIA- R5 R5 qL RA MH-0 v^ o a oe �_,� m C� I\ PLANNING ZONING DM 14 !�-' FCTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 13-6- II D GGO SCALE IN FEFT NOTE ALL CITY OF CITY ADOPTlD MARCH 7, 1960 COUNCIL ORDINANCE N O. 754 IIASN EM•G�TDsCRoNAnDNgLD �^"l SDg.�DTxJO,TO.[ID,A.vrL NT[c.INN.•prF HL.TF OT. THHCT CaE NWTCrA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTPICY AMENDED QRD.NO. AMENDED ORD•NO. ® TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTAICT HIJNTINGTON BEACH 1°-19-60 764 4.17-67 317 R• RESIOENUM. gGq[ULTUN.L DIS PoCT 3-8-61 621 6-16-67 1317 M2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 6-7-62 goo 7-1-68 1426 � LIGNT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 6-18-62 608 9-3-68 1440 MIA RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT B-5.63 692 1-6-69 (464 ® MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1-20-64 10D7 6.16-71 1732 LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 2-I-64 1031 6_5_71 174R HIGHWAMOBILH COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 2-IT-84 103T 6-5-72 1T4R ®®® MDBILNOYE DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 3-2-64 1041 12-19.77 2252 t� COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION 129, 131,237.253,340.360,390,404.402,416,443,464.66-33,66.67,66-66,68-17,68-26,66-43,71-13, 5-4-64 1056 12-18-78 2336 � CGMMUNITY'FACILITIES i—C)O-RICT PP71-3,72-11,77-3"C,78'23,80.2,82-4,62.5,62-6, -6-1151 1062 4-7-80 2425 [" COMMUNITY FACILIT IES,RECREATIONALI DISTRICT 8-19.84 1079 7-6-82 2555 ® LIMITED USE DISTRICT 8-1-66 1234 5-17-ez 255T SUFFIX LEGEND: II-I-62 2561 _ DESIGNATES"FATE STREETS - SETBACK LINE II 12 12 7 l4 13 3 IB J L ATLANTA 1L AVE II/F D.I u —� R3 I R3 R3 RI W +R3' RI i 6 3 RI RI RI 1 t. R3 R3 OR B CR V F :.., E RI rn 0 I R3 R3 S IF R{ RI RI RI= RI J m ' !tU.•Y17L(g2`a' _'^.� tlRLB i� Iy lw>> J SAT ERFIEL OR RI •ttTtteallp e.eD i Cdl R3 M:ru r= R2 X ;; �;�, R3 R2 RI RI R G _ �R2 JENNY q 1 Lx^-1t3 R3 ..,relR:. 1• W 1 RI RI oaBLTT E!D DR 1 R3 i i R2 0 �:.. I R 1 ':-- --�r--:._71R Mva ,. ; ..... .:r RI C4 1 R3 M =f YYMI[NODR; CF-E _ARCE CR R3 d RI RZ WI RI RI RI RI : aka _ = -- riFrr;_e9 RI 1 R3 9 R3 �' RI ?q2_„0 9ABL DR RI u.) cRr R� s RI S 1 R3 R3 RI RI RI 9TILWELL MDR. nLJ —UST-Da BY uweTINL w R4-2j 1 R3 R3 = RI RI S 3 1 FR I DDNC"" �� R3 LIar6a_c',` R3 ;`,:::. y RI C F—R W RA RI RI RI RI RI RI 4 j3 L.OR RA-4 M I-A-O tM.TLR.B DA RI mE.r.A. 1 f•NDT Noon oR f RI _::isCr; R!wRi RAI>:o::E Q 350l� WWLLTON t i 1 s CD MI-A-O MI-A-O' .. o CD F. C. D. LUID—O 11 ' Al.9 CIF I ea'n•Y• - r. �E E ti0y ',[p •SST MH $� rp ,r a c F �Y•' •,'/_jr 4 a- N.LINE I SE V4 SEC 13-6-11 M2-0 �Q4 M 2-0 PACIFIC OCEAN 1� ;!Q'"l �.. _ ♦ 13 Ifi PLANNING ZONING DIM 29 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 24-6-II NOTE; ALL DIME.-S ARE IN FEET. Y. CITE OF x;[ORE AOJDI OF ANY IGTT Of N.Y ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 ', jtRCED TD E%TEND TO xE CENTER of eucx RIoxT of WAY. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LEGEN D' _ SINGLE FAMILY R[AIDENCE DISTRICT ENDED QM 0""No. AM D.D.NO, Ixou9rRUL DIETRIcr R[9 T CR R[ DIST RI CT 261 166. OMIC PROFL891DRAL DISTRICT 618.6 263 COxIIIHED WITH 01 PRODGTIpHUNTINGTON BEACH <- gg • 1617 COMAMYFAgJTF9(RE ATINALIDISTRICT TICT12-9-77 77 22312-21.84 8J 268 L D LIMITED USE DISTRICT �RECRE.E DFER[PACED STR Cr ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA [9]QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION X t C I4 J IJ 16 •4 241p MI-A R L A Q lax Vwr -ROS ) � o•�i RI � E CA' �D (LUD)LIMITED USE 4 DISTRICT ca s ,sr ?P L, T LUD)LIMITED USE /r• DISTRICT A qC /C 5 0C' Fq ti MEWED AT THE HUNTOl6TON REACH RAHMNDRKNN AT PLANNING NING DM 22 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 19-6-10 a�E NEfT , NOTE' DI NEHSOHS•RE � EEET CITY OF •NLT;ORE AD'Di •, IWT o<WAT ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 �s .N ENDED o EKT.ND TO HE CENTER SUCHE cN cllr or1 W Y CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LEGEND ®I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AMENUED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. Co ICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT MF_Aj RESTRICTED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT HL�NTINGTON BEACH 6-20-60 726 2-20-73 2 ® NrewAr IL,RESIDE DISTRICT 12-5-60 604 12-19-77 2251 [M RESEEHIIAL AMICULTURAL DW- 3-20-61 826 4-17-78 2278 Co TWO:"AYIIT RESIDENCE UIBTn. . 9-3-63 IOOo ® LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 5-4-64 1o55 LIMITED USE DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10-6.65 161 12- 65 1168 4-17-67 1317 — SETBACK LINE AMENDED BY ZONE CASE:NO: 10-19-To 6G6 0- cDUNNED WITH OIL 118. 154.155,159,344.416.527.529.66-67.70-10.71-1,71-13,71-54,72-46,77d"8;78-3, 5-3-71 1643 CI COMBINED KITH OIL �3 8-i6-71 1664 72 735 6 1] 2<19 ' 920 1 BANNING AVE •II RI .-YARBLENEAO LN. 1 -- I z RI E_ RI RIIf - ♦ � J i PLAYA D0. a C4' 1 PORT Cl E DR ♦ JJJ{{{ E. R I RI-01 RI-01 RI< RI RI ADRI R11300eN 9A RI D:O ♦ / f g R I R I MOLOKAI Da. R 1 ¢4 a R I •LR50 cR R�r RI J RI f ♦♦ 1 J N R RI * / , 1 LA JOLLAIaLA CR. 71NI CR. o' RI I ` RI RI RI RI a OF `� ♦I l A/ g .D 7 ANI CR. LAWII CR. $ RI R 1 s3 RI � RI ♦I 1% W ♦ _� LEILANI DR wTa HARBOR OR ♦ � � / RI GATESHEAD OR R1 RI (LUD)LIMITED USE DISTRICT 1. RI m �C4 �,♦ UT JI ! MI—A ° / i w♦ m' ♦ m ♦ AD/ % U R I ♦♦ �P`� f ♦ _ / / r o o /j oo � o O (LUD) ° LIMITED �o USE C��A 9sr DISTRICT l�rf / 'c 0 i Aq o 2 c Q �' a u 4' I 1 a Q U CIA, o En P, 4 U cc 'TY of�w\_ O o97... R7 -\ f f y� f4fH o f 0 O V�O y O O0 h` q� 302M O� ° Off ? IF 14, o� r4°N r 'PLANNING ZONING QM 20 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP I8-6-10 -' NOTE ALL ,n,vN5 A CITY OF ADOPTED APRIL 4, I980 xlx,oNe +u a IN, . 1-1 UrIN rR +eNorG+o-rFT�LN �r CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 700 +,s_•cl• cx,0, AMENDED ORD.N0. AMENDED ORD.NO. - = OUALInED CLAssnuTICN 2-19-62 BBO 3-6-67 1304 ® LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT �/—"�■�T T T I�-TI T I T■ryI /` I-7•63 947 3-6-67 1304 ® COMMUNITY FACILITIES IRECREAT^INALIDISTRICT 1 ■ V�TTll ��1� 1., f 2 4-83 951 4-17-87 I317 SOLE iAT RESIDENCE RICTR¢t 1�J 1 � L 1 J- A 0-5-63 992 10-2-67 13 S 3 ® �rpvY CDMME ,U- DI RESIDENCE STRICT I I ( ` AMENDED ORD,ND. 9-tr. es 1004 2-5-6B 399 ® an" No,EcslaAL R A\ G E `.`� t.' -Is "I • `! A I,I �' 11 .\ ' _` 4-2-84 1043 4-IS-6B 14J3 � COMMUNITY FACILITIES IEOVCAT IOMALI DISTRICT 4-20-84 1048 6-17.88 '4L2 ® mArlNrrr Bu6[K43 gsTmcr 5-4-64 1055 10.17••;a I446 0 LIMITED MULTPUE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE a 10-64 IOTB 0-6-69 1529 SETBACK.LINE �7,336,343.357,409,42u,a1 456,518,528.66-I,66.2.86-21,66.42,68-89 7-8-eS I I S2 11-3-69 1539 [R�] RESIDENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISTWT IUJ,221,275.. 6, 10-16-83 1182 12:8-69 1542 -0- COMBINED MRN OIL 66-70,66-67,67-23.67.36,66-4,GB•16,69-27,69.25.69.29. 69.30.69-38.70-25.71-13,71-19;75-6, 4-4.66 1195 3-2-70 1556 -..-..� DESIGNATES TnRMTE.STREET 76-2,60-5, 4-4.68 1197 I-16-71 16. E T 1 6-20-61 1216 6-I6-71 1664 7 e E 1] e I ; 3-66 1257 6-16 1663 Is 17 \� I 5.5-80 2428 9.15-75 2012 _III ATLANTA I I 3 6.13-76 2101 AVENUE ��� I 3 L 1 � AR, _ SORIENT - DR RI ; ER1.5-5- M RI RI RI F 1 RI ;R I RI DR RIRI RIVPLIiEFIELU 1 1 RINL u 1 "` a CF-E RI RI RIRI 1 R I (lilSl.ER a.I ,DM I_F ; C F-E I PANIC A « EFFINGNAY DR 1 CF-R j 'CF-R .......... .....__. ________ __________ __.__. RA-0 E,::a:=: t. s 1 w. R I RIND E B I 1320 1320 RI J [WTpxa[ DR 11 ;HEVY CHASE DR >j._.... �._....�n...% ___IU RI R2.'110.TEj.ALBCR !.tg�:LC-lYC ` RI III RI R2 r R2: i W j �E FQ97_ItOTA:.:fl L JAMRIf4 iI._LR.,. "s TIDE—A a E I`S 1 DmaN wctu rn _._.. .._._.. II _-'__. 1 - ;; -- ` --- - �n s 5 Rl J I u SAW.N.,LA CA WI MASON POINT(J1Aj R2 g' R2 �� 0 R 1 RI.- R I g RI Ia RI � s RI � R_I RI ;� � 9RDUK0IY CR `4uw9=Ml CRC o c V01 B J 1 �PEPPERTREL N � J nw 9 s i - Rl RI �1 RI � RI ` R2 3 --- NNIMMININHAMILTON �--- tI, AVE +— :— - RI RI �� REGAT to C4 Rl RI. OR 1 C4 5 i $ C4 -I RI r RI J�� ; 5 RI •B _ R2 RI� RI RRI swrof r MIIYfR a yI 60e61E CR. M111T1 OR CR ; ' RI RI �� a ` R I RI a RI RI RI I L 1 RI --RI a RI NIGUEL R' R I R I I = ` R I RI 1 RI 1 Rl a r i R l LANDFALL W. A IA OR.2 MILL MIN R. al ICR ; rac R 3 R3 R I a RI 1 RI 1 Rt R1 � PI R1 R1 RHODESIA DR � IXANA OR. � a R I i RI 1 :AI W 3 ,I„ 1 BIRIAUCA R. — + NUD6 N I RI DR. Y Oc—sT RI I s ; a R3 1 _ "_ - 1 1 RI J RI 1 1 RI CF-R�s. RI 1� NAM I DR. CF—E . ; a IF RI '" _MIaBRa RI R I (FIND%cR`I:HC!:i.)« kAM lER 1 ` 6 /a 1 — MAHALO DR RI ; D RI 1 RI MMF T W 1". ' • a W\ Zj Rl OULBTAAND CR I I RI WW " RI RI 5 RI b 1 NAPAA DR. 0 7l RI Rl 1 DAYTOxA OR I ; Dm IQ 1 1 ^ Q I =ALOHA 1 R I RIR RI Y CF-RD I �RL� RI BANNING AVE. - - I[ ; Is IT !♦ N It 20 PLANNING ZONING DM 7 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP • 7-6-10 ,FIET NOTE ALL MUSH IONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF ADOPTED AUGUST I5,1960 AN Y LORE ADJOINING ANY RIGHT OF WAY IS INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER RIHT O OF SUCH RIGHT Of WAY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 765 LEGEND: •MENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. Q-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HiJNTINGTON BEACH 8-6-62 1BIG05 20-69 1453 RA RESIDENTIAL ApRICULTURAL DISTRICT S•4-64 1055 h20-69 1466 C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 6.15-64 IOb2 4-6-70 1567 ® LOE.-AYr BIMJESI gSTRIII 12-T-64 - 1106 4-6-70 1568 R-, NlcgwAY coAlMEpc�AL CISTRICr S•1-65 1123 T 12-7-70 1617 � COMBINED WITH qL PRODUCTION ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5-17.65 II,I 2-5 1624 -a'RED FAC CITIES(EDUCATIONAL)DISTRICT 12-6-65 1168 5-3-71 1646 �'+ COMMUNITY FACILITIES IRECREATIO-LIGISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 5-16-66 1207 8-16-71 1664 SUFFIX LEGEND: 255,416 446,482,502,510,539.86-12,66-34,66-42,67-II.67-22 8-IE-66 1243 1-15-79 2342 - DESIGNATES PRIVATE STREETS 10-3-66 1237 10-20-80 2457 --- SETBACK 66-65,68-35,68-45,69-45,70-3,70-17,70-23,71-4,71-13,78-10,80-12, 5-15-67 1323 9-18-67 1349 9-IB-67 1347 ! i 3 a 7 7 e 11 ADAMS 1 AVE. FRI 1 kl RI hyl.Dp. C RI RI RI RI RI ICI,l IN J RAIN' CR_ o C4 N RI / s dRI RI 1 a RI RA b z RI H. R. ' 1g R I 1 f:l IF RI Y RI v4D c 1 RI i a 1 /v'1 RI RI 1 MEDITERRANEAN OR NAUTILUS 5 DR RINGS CANYON DR_ j RI RI RI 1 R'-JCR J RI 1 LIflI 1 Gu55 OR CANDI EWGGD DP MAMMOTH 1 I RI z RI z RI d RI y s RI 1 I !R y \ I z 1 YELIDMSTONERI ''�� R I M R I R 1 - i 'L FiTatls a u c 1 1' I RI pJETTpM1 RI RI c RII R 12 _ 1 ^� �+ `z R I R I R I o R l a l �MOKET cHW w 1 1 R w„DD K cR g o a a 1 PECK DR. s IRI G RI I a i 1 ��•° RI " a a m w 1 R' :` -s BROWNING DR NAZElBROON nR o RI RI RI RI RI $ 1 R BIG SUR j DR. 1 Q / a RI 1 5 5 OR 1 S[RI BAY MEADOW DR RI o RI VICKlBDRG OR - 1 I $ jC045T1<NO OR R w 1 RI a RI RI RI RI RI RI RI W R1 RI RI RI RI 1 CLgAW'YEN OA ~I IJ'; ~ NOT SPRING DR. 1 1 33 RI f'C1� sl (`i L/ RI IA APO —_� . RI 3r p AVE 1 x D J R I 1 E CAITNNESS°RI � RI 6 RI/ DR. LT cp!.A rR � J?lR1A RI g RI s RI CFR9 = 8 ; RI RI RI - RI DA 3 NINGNAN p / ; LAD DR. R` p — 7 R 1 1 RI RI 1 ELLSWOFTH DR. R1 8 RI RI 1 A C F-E wTuaTe, DR_ R I. 1 = ('S,1.i:;Si:'dii:RS::(:Fi:!:':.1 I - DUENBRECN DR. ~ PINNAKFR DRIVE `l 1 RI RI / RI Ri 3 I RI R I 1 AL AN CR HARCOUR NETHERWIY OR V TAC R CIRCL[ j RI J RI RI RI RI °'"k1 R1 RI a RI RI - - 1 RI 1 9UNpIpGE DR. /'ERSKIN R / SPENCE CR CF-R e1 KR / 1 RI RI j RI T so EE RI Q 1 M $ U WOODCREST DA. J , .'RIARSODUI..- M RI S AR OR yJ / CARROLLTOW.N ' Z R I RI RI 3n RI ; RI RI WINTERWOOD CIL v+ a 1 H § RI 1 C F-E APWOp H CA. R1 1 5 1 RI 1 F,r R I A 3 RI LIYMAM I� s:: :'... . RI 1 RI COMSTOCK pq ;R1 397[ UPLAND 0= F RI DRAGC.V CR. RI ENDEAR p N OCEA-D DII RI �ll RI H'm z ...,,E Ir x. . RI, o R1 FRI 1 Q a w XALF L �' ; WESTLLIFF DR. / a -LRI i 1 RI i $ c RI R1 W RI 1 y RA q RI �W RI E cNANCE cR. s_ RI 8 I =' b RI F:RE91DE z DR. Sf.OTlTOVN Of, IT E DR_ N RS �' —1--- RI RI ; RI RI K RI ATLANTA x 7 / AVE. IS q 7 e Is n PLANNING ZONING DM 6 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP IS 6-.6 - 10 KALF N FEE: NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF ADOPTED AUGUST 1980 ANr zDNE AD oININD ANY RIDNT or wsr IS INTENDED TO""END To THE CENTER Of B.C.MONT-�� CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. T05 LEGEND: OF war AMENDED ORD,NO, AMEND D QRD,lotQ p� OFFICE PNOFESSIONAL DISTRICT 5-21-62 903 7-2.1-66 1167 - CI MIGMWNY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH B-6.62 7.18-66 1228 Q LIMITE FAMILY TV RESIDENCE 1DENCE 10-I-62 929 10-3-66 1257 p3 LIMITED YULTPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT II-19-62 936 L-3-67 1281 © COMMUNITY eISINES3 DISTRICT I-7-63 947 2-6-67 1277 R2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTNCT 4-1-63 958 9-5-67 1345 ® RESIDENTIAL ADRICLITURN. DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5-20-63 996 4.1-67 1349 90 COMMUNITY DISTRICT 8-19-63 896 4•I-6B 1400 � COMMUNITY FACILITIES IEDUCITIONI DISTRICT 10-7-63 1007 5-20-68 1412 ® COMMUNITY FACT.ITIES IREDRFATIDMALI DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: Z. 64 1034 7-15-68 1428 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(CINCIOISTRICT 240.236,268,277,280,294,309,311,321,345.346,393,427 8-1-64 1060 8-4-89 1514 DESIGNATES NRATE STREETS 457,482,496,452,511,544,66-27,66-42,66-59,66-98 8-19-64 1079 1-4-71 1621 _- SET9ACN LINE 67-20.67-22,66-3,68-8,89-19,69-19,70-6,71-12,70-26,73-11, 12-7-64 - 1106 9-7-71 1657 2-15-65 1122 9-18-72 1637 sz 3-15-65 1082 e-6-73 I861 )I l a 6-21-65 1146 - a s GARFIELD AVE. 1 I 1 ' g RI Y .] V YDI.e: F R I BL'uL[IfIN R) RA PI . S.RRY ER R I ALBACORE OR = RI RI RI R1 CI RI ;RIxR5 N RI N 1 C EL J wl M LY cR Ijl z GAGS DR. IN i U) — RI _ x RI E MH R3 N CA ; ITCXFIEI D a+ R I R I R I RI CZ I ; 694'IN RI S ' 3 N RI - I w LARDO- VELARDO ~ ' .DE PART( oR oL R 1 R I 0 1 O. C. F. C. D' b 080 '-'1-1.:' 4'W ------ ^FE R� Ri'A RI i:15GH RiW RA •,TI2 3 ---------------------- -----E I 260 KREPP DR. J FLOUNDER R.s 1 J J t W� t RI 1 I 1 a CF—E _ K DR ' RONNEY DR. , MDIn.AA Op 1 ` rau)er s:ac::_) $P1 RI RI RI P1 RI RI RI RI MH 1 I C _ SAILFISN DR. _ RI RI � RI 1 ENOWaY T m 7 KARENC TARPON ; ' RI W RI - 15 _ RI t� RI RI RI RI �' ' RIK RI DR GRAND RI R g RI C4 a 1 RI 8 RI RI 1 3 RI VERONICA E DR. GREENWICH DR. 1 AF,E D c C M 3 FREo[paR CA I _ 1 RI I RI j RI RI RI RI RI Si:XO(ii.) RI 1 a WAAFIELD DR. -PORTSMOUTH DR. ; DN 3 CA - I n ..5B.UCN � RI RI J RI � RI �RI — RI RI OR 9 �. CF—E RI W ELYA CR NANTUCKET OR ' WOOOLAWN T A B01ID E • 1 R I ; RI�� CF-R (HIISHANO 6�XucLl $I RI MADELINE DR. 4 HYANNIS PORT DR. ' WARBURTON t DR CDKSTITUTNW RI x ,,, RI RI 1 RI RI� ' Ma'I .0•.s. CF-C' I AD- CAPE COD DR. I TE—N DR FO.M RI F C F—E r z ' R2 i NDRr LINE =E ,E I,. SEC D J J 1 J ('.va:r,:o'A•6::H�n;.1 GROTON DR. ; e1CKLEY D 3 I R3 I R! J R3 R3 R3 I R3 3 ; R2 x 3L 1�Ro« N J Q ' NONEER I PETrswOOD DR R3 uMAROa LN 020° Tor R2 5 gq F ' RI RI R) RI R) RI II R3 R3 R3 R3 R3 R3 R3 pR3 R3 R3„ R3 ¢ In Or GETTYSBIAG qDR RI I 9 ¥ _ 1 I RDw a F FF Y NLINF LOT e3 iR4� I ��EL W W AALC 3 5 DR A/ I IDo °�.� CRNMFORD CR. q I Ilo K }}CC RN MI /+/� C4 IWI w a a3 3 R3 R3 R3 </2 I m . R3 -FRS $I o °•- u S g J R3 •ma o+ ADAMS I AVE. EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION (0132D) Those portions of sections 6, 79 18 and fractional section 19 in Township 6 South, Range 10 West and sections 1, 13, 12, 11, 14 and fractional section 24 in Township 6 South, Range 11 West, and section 36 in Township 5 South, Range 11 West in the Rancho Las Bolsas in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue and Magnolia Street, said point being the northwest corner of section 6, Township 6 South, Range 10 West as shown on Tract Map 4304 in Book 158, Page 24 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said centerline also being the north line of said mentioned section 6, North 890 34' 29" East 2644.52 feet to the north quarter corner of said section 6, said corner also being the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street as shown on said.Tract Map 4304; thence continuing along the north line of section 6 and centerline of Garfield Avenue North 890 40.' 45" East 2637.06 feet to the northeast corner of said section 6, said point also being the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue and Brookhurst Street as shown on Tract Map 4852 in Book 175, Page 23 of Miscellaneous Maps.-in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the east line of said section 6, said east line also being the centerline of Brookhurst Street, South 00 38' 52" East 2635.41 feet to the east quarter corner of said section 6, said corner also being the center line intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Brookhurst Street as shown on Tract Map No. 4852; thence along the north line of the southeast one-quarter of said section 6, said north line also being the centerline of Yorktown Avenue, South 890 37' 52" West 2639.36 feet to the center of said section 6, said center being the centerline intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Bushard Street as shown on Tract Map No. 4852; thence along the west line of said mentioned southeast one-quarter, said west line also being the centerline of Bushard Street, South 00 35' 51" East 2639.46 .feet to the north quarter corner of section 7, Township 6 South, Range 10 West, said corner also being the centerline intersection of Bushard Street and Adams Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street South 10 16' 35" West 2640.94 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street, South 00 35' 40" East 2642.45 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street South 00 39' 09" East 2639.52 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Hamilton Avenue; thence continuing along theme centerline of Bushard Street South 00 39' 03" East 2640.36 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Banning Avenue; thence along the centerline of Banning Avenue North 890 37' 00" East 1654.32 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Brookhurst Street; thence along the centerline of Brookhurst Street, South 370 39' 25" West 2975.73 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Talbert Channel, thence along said northeasterly right-of-way line South 480 39' 45" East 2021.66 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of O.R. 3575-317; thence South 160 31' 26" West 73.21 feet; thence South 150 52' 05" West 125.77 to the south right-of-way line of the Talbert Channel; thence North 480 39' 45" West 2037.27 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1000 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve an arc distance of 301! feet; thence North 380 19' 15" West 888.04 feet; thence North 430 03' 20" West 298.21 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of the Huntington Beach Channel being 145 feet in width, said southerly right-of-way line being 62.5 feet south of the channel centerline; thence continuing along said south right-of-way line North 620 48' 03" West 1092.48 feet.to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 4862.50 feet; thence continuing along said curve thru a central angle of 170 40' 00" an arc distance of 1499.31 feet; thence North 450 08' 03" West 247.19 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2462.50 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 440 30' 59" an arc 1 distance of 1913.26 feet; thence North 00 37' 04" West 115± feet; thence westerly 400 feet; thence northerly 200 feet; thence westerly 180 feet; thence southerly 200 feet; thence westerly 640.41 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Newland Street; thence northerly along the centerline of Newland Street 100± feet to the intersection with the southerly line of the Orange County Flood Control District DI-1 Channel; thence along said southerly line North 870 42' 24" West 2150± feet to a line parallel with and 110 feet west measured at right angles from the west boundary line of Tract No. 5581; thence North 00 40' 14" West 3200± feet to the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence along the centerline of Atlanta Avenue South 890 37' 06" West 490± feet to the northeast corner of section 14, Township 6 South, Range 11 West; thence along the east line of last said mentioned section 14, South 00 44' 22" West 1320.00 feet to the intersection with the easterly prolongation of the south boundary line of Tract No. 9580; thence along said southerly boundary South 890 43' 00" West 1325.54 feet to the west boundary line of said Tract No. 9580; thence along said west boundary North.0° 43' 14" West 1320.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline intersection of Atlanta Avenue; thence along the centerline of Atlanta Avenue North 890 43' 00" East 40.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Delaware Street; thence along the centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 24" West 55.00 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 1214.63 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 100 54' 30" an arc distance of 231.25 feet to a reverse curve, concave northwesterly having a radius of 1214.63 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 100 54' 30" an arc distance of 231.25 feet; thence continuing .along the centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 24" West 127.20 feet to a curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 160 48' 3511, an arc distance of 293.38 feet to a reverse curve concave easterly having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 16a 48' 35" an arc distance of 293.38 feet; thence continuing along the centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 24" West 440 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Frankfort Avenue; thence North 890 18' 25" East 276.76 feet along the centerline of Frankfort Avenue to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 380.71 feet as shown on a map of the Valley View Tract recorded in Book 5 Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 460 27' 22" an arc distance of 308.68 feet; thence continuing along the centerline North 420 51' 03" East 624.66 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1399.59 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 180 39' 28" an arc distance of 455.76 feet; thence North 240 1 P 35" East 47.54 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue 63.00 feet to the intersection with the section line of section 12, Township 6 South, Range 11 West, said intersection being the southwest corner of the northwest one-quarter of said section 12; thence northerly along the west line of said northwest one-quarter 2415± feet; thence easterly 268.00 feet; thence northerly 225.00 feet to the centerline of Adams Avenue; thence along the centerline of Adams Avenue North 890 48' 32" East 27.00 feet; thence North 00 1 P 47" West 169.98 feet; thence North 280 46' 31" East 495.61 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 120.00 feet; thence South 890 20' 06" West 140.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 140.00 feet; thence North 890 20' 06" East 140.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 515.00 feet; thence North 250 54' 00" East 335.41 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 960.00 feet to the centerline of Yorktown Avenue; thence along the centerline of Yorktown Avenue North 890 47' 22" East 208.64 feet to the intersection with the Northerly prolongation of the west boundary of Tract No. 7742 as shown on a map recorded in Book 459 Page 50 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said west boundary South 00 12' 38" East 124.28 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 500.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 560 46' 50" an arc distance. of 495.48 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 500.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 130 10' 41" an arc distance of 115.00 feet; thence along the radial line to said point South 460 11' 29" West 27.00 feet to a point on a curve concentric to last mentioned curve; thence southeasterly along said concentric curve thru a central angle of 110 27' 33" an arc distance of 94.80 feet to a reverse curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 527.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 100 50' 02" an are distance of 99.65 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 23.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve thru a central angle of 830 48' 25" an .arc distance of 33.64 feet to a point of cusp with the northwesterly right-of-way line of Coldwater Lane said point being on a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 427.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 180 14' 53". an arc distance of 135.99 feet; thence along the radial to said point South 310 07' 48" East 27.00 feet to a point on the centerline of Coldwater Lane, said point being a point of reverse curvature said reverse curve being concave to the northwest having a radius of 307.00 feet; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 220 58' 5011, an arc distance of 123.13 feet; thence North 350 53' 22" East 451.80 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 360 06' 0011, an are distance of 252.03 feet; thence North 00 12' 38" West 71.61 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Yorktown Avenue; thence along the centerline of Yorktown Avenue South 890 33' 30" East 241.40 feet to the centerline of Newhaven Lane as shown on a map of Tract No. 3908 recorded in Book 138 Page 17 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Newhaven Avenue, North 00 0.1' 00" West 599.76 feet to a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 340.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 20° 07' 44" an arc distance of 119.45 feet to a point of reverse curvature, a radial line to said point bears North 690 55' 16" West; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 200 07' 44" an arc distance of 122.12 feet; thence North 00 O1' 00" West 117.99 feet to a curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 110 15' 27" an arc distance of 58.94 feet to the centerline of Bridgeport Drive; thence along the centerline of Bridgeport Drive North 770 06' 40" East 78.65 feet to a cruve concave northwesterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 140 24' 35" an arc distance of 50.30 feet; thence continuing along the centerline of Bridgeport North 62a 42' 05" East 159.21 feet to a curve concave southerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve 75± feet to the intersection with the centerline of 20 foot wide alley as shown on said map of Tract 3908; thence North 00 01' 20" West 1081± feet to the south line of lot No. 65 of said Tract 3908; thence along said south line South 890 56' 40" West 68.00 feet to the westerly line of said lot No. 65; thence along said west line North 310 42' 29" East 170.30 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 140.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 600 44' 31" an arc distance of 148.42 feet; thence North 0° O1' 20" West 139.59 feet to the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said point being distant 202.01 feet along the centerline of Garfield Avenue from the centerline of Newland Street; thence along the centerline of Garfield Avenue South 890 40' 15" West 270.02 feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the centerline of Crimson Circle as shown on a map of Tract No. 8961 recorded in Book 388 Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along centerline of Crimson Circle North 00 50' 14" West 384.62 feet to a curve, concave westerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; . thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 23' 26" an arc distance of 57.90 feet to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 55.00 feet; thence northerly and northeasterly along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 900 17' 22" an arc distance of 86.67 feet to a second consecutive reverse curve, concave northwesterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 49' 1911, an arc distance of 58.72 feet to a third consecutive reverse curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve thru a central angle of 320 55' 2311, an arc distance of 114.92 feet; thence North 890 09' 46" East 107.32 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Flagstaff Lane, said point being on a curve concave westerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 330 53, 39" an arc distance of 118.31 feet to a reverse curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 47' 4911, an arc distance of 58.63 feet; thence North 320 24' 34" West 586.05 feet to a curve concave easterly having a radius of 113.72 feet; thence northerly along said curve. thru a central angle of 320 03' 09" an arc distance of 63.62 feet; thence North 00 21, 25" West 53.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Modale Drive as shown on a map of Tract No. 8332 recorded in Book 367 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Modale Drive South 890 38' 35" West 130.23 feet to the easterly boundary of Tract No. 7628 as shown on a map recorded in Book 352 Page 38 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said east boundary North 00 51' 25" West 660.72 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract No. 7628, said point also being on the southerly boundary of Tract No. 8687 as shown .on a map recorded in Book 361 Page 21 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said south boundary North 890 36' 44" East 64.66 feet to the southeast corner of said Tract No. 8667; thence along the east boundary of Tract No. 8687 North 00 50' 15" West 660.78 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Ellis Avenue, said point also being the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the west boundary line of Tract No. 7771 as shown on a map recorded in Book 352 Page 38 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said west boundary North 00 39' 11" West 743.33 feet; thence North 89° 20' 49" East 125 feet; thence South 00 39' 11 East 84.13 feet; thence North 89a 44' 17" East 243.15 feet; thence North 380 14' 20" East 41.00 feet; thence North 160 18' 24" East 44.16 feet; thence North 580 50' 00" East 55.50 feet; thence North 310 00' 00" East 45.00 feet; thence North 320 35' 24" East 72.06 feet; North 290 14' 15" East 65.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 48" West 56.00 feet; thence North 890 20' 12" East 110.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Newland Street; thence along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 39' 48" East 2640.43 feet to the centerline intersection with Ellis Avenue said intersection also being the center of section 36 Township 5 South, Range 11 West; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 51'25" East 2643.74 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 36; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 37' 20" East 2640.38 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Yorktown Avenue, said intersection also being the center of section 1 as shown,on a map of Tract No. 7991 recorded in Book 315 Page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 36' 38" East 2640.46 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Adams Avenue said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 1 as shown.on said Map of Tract No. 7991; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street, South 00 39' 05" East 2642.56 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue, said intersection also being the center of section 12, Township 6 South, Range 11 West as shown on a map for Tract No. 7341 recorded in Book 301 Page 22 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 0° 39' 19" East 2651.08 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Atlanta Avenue, said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 12 as shown on said map of Tract No. 7341; thence along the centerline of Atlanta Avenue North 890 38' 45" East 2640.83 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Magnolia Street as shown on said map of Tract No. 7341; thence along the centerline of Magnolia Street, North 00 35' 45" West 2640.60 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis as shown on a map for Tract No. 6309 recorded in Book 233 Page 49 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street North 00 39' 05" West 2642.56 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Adams Avenue as shown on a map for Tract No. 7692 recorded in Book 329 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street North 00 37' 20" West 2641.13 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Yorktown Avenue as shown on a map for Tract No. 7991 recorded in Book 315 Page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street North 00 37' 15" West 2640.29 feet to the Point of Beginning; Excepting therefrom that portion described as follows: Beginning at the east one-quarter corner of section 13, said corner being the centerline intersection of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue; thence along the centerline of Magnolia Street South 00 38' 30" East 2120± feet to a curve concave northwesterly,having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 430 42' 09" an arc distance of 762.75 feet; thence South 430 03' 39" West 80.64 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Orange County Flood Control District's Talbert Channel, said point also being on a curve concave northerly having a radius of 4717.50 feet; thence westerly along said curve 150± feet to the end of said curve; thence North 450 08' 03" West 247.19 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2317.50 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 44° 30' 59" an arc distance of 1800.60 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a i radius of 457.69 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 30 — an arc distance of 60± feet to the southerly prolongation of the easterly boundary of Tract No. 9843 as shown on a map recorded in Book 477 Page 44; thence along said prolongation and east boundary North 00 40' 42" West 800± feet to the centerline of Hamilton Avenue; thence along the centerline of Hamilton Avenue North 890 35' 00" East 1320.45 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT C LIST OF PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS (0132D) NOTE: Refer to Exhibit D for map showing locations of improvements: EXHIBIT C PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS Storm Drains Installation of additional storm drains to correct deficiencies and increase capactiy at the fallowing locations: 1. At the Adams pump station, a 60-inch storm drain to parallel the existing pipe from the pump station to Bushard Street in Adams Avenue (Drainage District 7B). 2. At the Banning pump station, a 54-inch storm drain in Banning Avenue and a 42 inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to parallel the existing pipes (Drainage District 7C). 3. In the vicinity of the Atlanta pump station, a network of drains including a 30-inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1,600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/Delaware and Elmira/Delaware area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach Boulevard (Drainage District 88). 4. At the Indianapolis pump station, a 54-inch storm drain to parallel the existing storm drain from the pump station to Bushard Street (Drainage District 7F). 5. In the vicinity of the Fountain Valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains including an 84-inch storm drain from the Channel to Brookhurst Streeet where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2,000 feet then branches north and south with 24-inch storm drains (Drainage Districts 6B, 6A & 7D). Pump Stations Correction of deficiencies in the following City-owned pump stations: 6 Flounder pump station, 9731 Flounder Lane - major modification to pump station and incoming line. 7. Indianapolis pump station, 9221 Indianapolis Avenue - replacement of two small engines and pumps with larger units. 8. Newland pump station, 8612 Hamilton Avenue - construct additional building with two pumps. 9. Adams pump station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - replace two engines. 10. Yorktown pump station, 9211 Yorktown Avenue - replace one pump and engine. 11. Atlanta pump station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue - add sump pump. (0132D) Drainage Channels Correction of deficiencies in the system of county-owned drainage channels (DO1, DO2 & DO5) through widening, deepening and concrete lining and including construction of one or more water retarding basins, depending upon alignment selected. 12. DO Channel 13. DO2 Channel 14. DO5 Channel 15, Bartlett Park (Possible retarding basin site) 16. Edison right-of-way (Possible retarding basin site) (0132D) EXHIBIT D MAP OF PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS (0132D) ■ k,�,tI . LE�I��nm c ���0 IOW • � • � � • • se Is c.a�'n� .�•� 1 11 IImL: � � EI•�I 1�c_se gg sellnw.'- 14 Uri ' Lit, � ��.Mj� IillAulullrt� • lal... is. �Aa_� 1:a�1,.•.a�iia:bpihii�_- '�E i r; RIiiB .` �i n unun:.a11= c aer a�.- .ptlltlpq..-i•i'pm iM:`-.,�Y.k11pWq■ni/-- t �s�j11►/iQ!►R.� •^^-~j1■pp�1�1% Y pl■IIx111.ti�L u�N�il�rll� .-�nww• �'yv 'tlA1111:.1�I G�1s..� I��wll. 1 115.,�+6c■�1Y'M �•ptlltl�ll 1l11/.1 MI ApY.11■Iltl� ■rw `a�z• ■ ■1{ ��unllw I In �.f;- _.� ■1�.■■.I■. T 4 1 14..c m. un w?7 y nul. 2 m nnum�■ '�4i �1■p■ ..11. nss• .HI'1 xl •'\� ..�\NI1IIY a,�lYi Z� Him t-.f1 Li..u�-:IIIIIiH�-F`�.!�A1.�A�wxMAtll�pMMiu. �p�.A, •M11�1see --men. �`IMImI�11O�- �__.� Q y■I .a■Hum..xnnx$•w"�itlnpn■r -H.r.�i:AYAlllj C :751==1 ni;MMIn p.■M.Mnxq.�'I i Imo.■1 IV ../ �!//"■S n�' �'@_=mn-1�� -:�.�y,uu■i n;lm L r. :a�p {g ;..a ia�' .. 1�Z SF■-•. .Inm.mgN■Iml,ll�ll-- _ ■�� _ M..pi. AY■IN`■ABM-k _ L-■Y�`.■1� � I. _ I-a T.. L `�; �• ■i11 1111 =`= : .. ._�. ♦ tali___f — a-- _y a I��M�.I11 w ■i 3uwupm.. •ar- `,.IitlAY.1■IiA I� „1y- _ �-.-..�� Y\I �■ .HIIx1Y1tl.I� =I.On{�11 _ — Yllltl■ � C.�41�m.CS� � .mump �i'xlnw. f Y�H a�� Ir■,^r a �' �� � m■ gx ■ Pia�:��1.�.�1.�.■wel■■9 f .Mw■ Sj c � . 1�''.r^Ha1m = :=Lai' L S• � � �1111 T.111 i1■1 • /.. IIwIq'sj' .!Imp 5ii ' ! � pMll�- �• �� � +.r► � `�"' li�1111 el 11� fill 1. sou p.l�mptlM �f �r y �• `i;r",y'- r.1. IIIOII 111111'� _°g .�.- IIIII1.lO.�.- gg�el�;, ��- 1•^ E � ■ .M.Y' Inl.l''Ym■. ql■■1� � � . Y C P�'S �� ''' •I'• '.11�!1�■Ili••.t',6'C k11Try .MMIM IYMwpu. r.L�. � iMll 3lAlllli 4,'R x YII■weM 11'�' r 1 •^ —• • HEIR {� I!•ININI' r .IIc ,�����i� '� �"'I�aiin a Q :Imir'p�. u=1 E-e• �y� � 1,-� .. T �'J' �/yl�l�lrla0� {e..,,.■A.�,:1-1=a il.�•` Mag- I�,p:.., �3 •Y.� l _ �. ."�� '� I/� �'•' �IUIIYill la l_ ni�,- ■� � .-.. . a A -i 1 1�♦'j � � � _luuli e3 3" L 'v r" ` Arxw1YY1 '�' i� � w■■ M. Js t6 IlilllN7 E!�! ` -c, E.. -• rJ eiki.m■� f x-p1M�1_ ,' � �, `` Ha; 1 E .1 '-� � • � - =1•i i as.11�':�: @� r�Ixlll•1■:' -: � - c � lrMMYi.i�n ��—�� x. aC �' � SIW '■ ;r f_ C .Ig1AIuw1 a a������.�0. �IsS rt�nl�.�• •_� �,1_3 '�nn.I..NII$1VNNtJ�.�..Ac ti'� � • s_...i. L-�,_':iL� .1,�faC s�.1p11111�.1 .irl'Y.'IYN�� II.IMI� .m.■paAi' ' aT `■a�� 02 E I9 '�NNtl■. ¢D.IIAp■S,7 �.•Iq Lq'/1 i'i �.1 ■ j k N■III■M.�� �C11,IS PCc\. � '-� ♦ npna�nn'd �:: .' iufm,unxltl. ..d I Is ' i %pia .��7�f�Is ..un� • riyrhi 11 FBI-�.Un sense i 1 Iam -aiui. •S ' Ip,�y`y y�ir r'1� y.\i.'!'li'Iripi OyiN in 1I■I I,I..7...• � AI.I.II■■I11-�-.��� •j • it EXHIBIT E MAP OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USES (0132D) Nu 1 plr-• �T.. • iii � � N�ii`�t+ _Pit is n I + �• ,giant��1ppT� • . . . ,.:: •�'_ w�I�MI IIC �i/il�IppNp■pll-. I/••� r�In11�1��1'AIpIMMplpW/-� .��1�� �Y� �i�+IYnIYI �1:[c` pMNIIm1■■yy.���� � ,•a-�C-' �� ••� 1 1 NpIm11M i-y ••I 1 C IFhCiermm' • e1J�11''•' •' v ° :� 71s, AW • w"I141 IIIIIII 111 .IIp11pA - �� it- :r. •tiii Altii ._;a mmur.. _ I fi�i VV Or laid • •y, M!COLA AMN.-T1lwwiNlmpl"YI? ,. / • -• • •..V�111�IHp 1fMn��q"pnlpp111p1p0�YI I ��1 • = -1111�II�p M 1$-OpIp1111mnN11. • 1�• �� ' I w u �■ ."1 w pm�Cam. .y..a�Tn-' j � • �glig,!'"�. lE18■ e �' ii ppl i n+mlul■.rpi,i�ir- L-I-; m 1' u � n 0'.ER Ii9E IMI.�I _ Ip 11.u1u 1 c- - n■Lu`m ` I i-,,� a� O■ { -T.,:•: ( t'IW �o11�i Cpp r'9• ,Ci•C LfO�i ��� ��` /rpaeE EE 11 E) �,-, k�..A ..■ww,p�In �v Illp.. NMINI/� /� IPA• {�sll WII a = �Nrv . w 1- rtiililasomi aa n, IN w.nlii� /r�•. � E �32 ••••••,••••••••••. _ `,�� '- •`- - - _ifil'pu„",��,C� . ffiI "'■" ,y Idllw .�IeZ�. r `•�1�11 L ��i a il��E ,•�lii'��.Ici "q � A .gin is n �I�.1riS - zSke � � .�• +` AmE E!/����� VYV ...N yL.�'=�p':,I�1p ,wj� q �'I� i � A''� t �WZ,= • oee11 ■ p■■■ .,,. _..i:nlnv Eiiiui{I" /` �.���{�j■wpu rl•lue 14i1■ �IfQiii iiiil�w. La' .� ,/ �� " 1�j `�C•-0• 11 1 ".i ;. `A,� ���•�><:t �,��... ` .:_s�•�.�Y�:���s :� .—� Ir .Itl3� ■ ■■Iln!•, r•�Illw-�'T_- ups :Nti+"n■. gyp\\' ' rIt i1m1E E(/EE ?Illpin 1• �""�"rS. rwis pwP •" - S� ono. 4nnnr f `i jwvj ''-!: ; ■ 91 ', +�®e;9 •�>s'oaeeo> 1 itSI 1� ri'..� y _.iAoIamp1�! 1 Id -�• 1 11 I Ip11 ►NKIllliilli �: N� =-'= ','fe ;�.• Ipp SQUI "� 'I� p III.IIIIIIIII. Sim t II.'1"1+: :Ma. . .. .1.1 Us `� NII_ '��M111 rl_F!!of iil'A.1 IN�� . • INIIIs IpIp1 Iq• MF SO Ilk -6�1M i i ,9s 3 EXHIBIT F DISTRIBUTION OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE TYPES (0132D) PERCENTAGE_ of LAND USE TYPE +++++++++.+++ +-++++++++++++++++ . ++++++++++++++'++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++ . + +++++++++++++++++++++++++ . i +++++++++++++++++++++++++++. . +++++++++++-}-+++-1-+i-+++++++++++ ++++++++.++RESIDENTIAL-+++++++++++ +++++++++++ -+++++++++++-. +++++++++++ 87% •++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++ I ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ - COMMERICAL ++++++++++++++++++++++++. ++++++++++++++++++++�L 4% ++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++ INDUSTRIAL, ++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1% +++++++++++++++++++++++.. +++++++++++++++++++++++. ......................... ++++++++++++++++++++++++++•. . f ++++++++++++++++++++++++++, PUBLIC ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.. . 8% ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++� . ++++++++++++++++++++++++� +++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++ E`.a HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN BREAKDOWN PLANNING DIVISION L'� yqA EXHI S ' i TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUGGESTED CHANGES SHEET Existing test on page 12 of Plan : 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.1, and 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. -- Except by amend[rent of this Plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: a) $25,200,000 ($20,168,000 for proposed irnprovernents and $5,042,000 for low and moderate income housing) for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan; I b) Any a[nounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income F-iousing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of very low, low or moderate income. Suggested revision : a) $30 , 000 , 000 for all Agency redevelopment activities .in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan ; Explanation : The amount of $25 , 200 ,000 indicated in the Plan should be changed to $30 , 000 , 000 based on a verbal �._ agreement recently made with the County. That agreement increases the City ' s financial contribution to the County for the purpose of making flood channel improvements . The impact on this figure was discussed by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1984. Ss TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ADDITONS TO PLAN The following additions should be made as underlined: I Page 10 3.4.1 Nondiscrimination'and Nonsegregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. Deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, leaser sublease or other transfer of any land in the initial Project Area shall contain the nondiscrimination clauses prescribed:in Section 33436 of the California Health and Safety_Code. Page 10 3.5.5 : Relief of Financial Burdens• The Agency may, but is not required to, in any year during which.it owns property in a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to; a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exempt, an amount of money in lieu of, taxes. The Agency may also, but is.not required to, pay to any taxing agency with territory located within.the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which in the Agency's determination is appropriate.to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the project. The provisions.of California Health and Safety Code Section 33401.are 'incorporated herein by reference. Page 12. 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.1; and 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment.Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: a) $80,5009000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan; November 19, 1984 - b) Any amounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of.the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused'to such taxing agency by the Project; and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to.Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of .very low, low or moderate income. -- The time limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be twenty years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. No loans,advances or indebtedness to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the beforementioned Section 33670 shall:be established or incurred by the Agency beyond such time limitation unless such time limit is extended by amendment of this. plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness to. be repaid in whole or in part by the Agency if it chooses to sell bonds, which is within its powers, from the allocation of taxes to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of-the sum of: 3g �� a) ($ > e 7t for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) and debt service; b) And additional amounts paid: 1. By the Agency.to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of.this•Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and 2. Twenty percent'of the amount paid to any taxing agency (set forth in Section 1. above) for Low and . Moderate Income Housing (Health and Safety Code Section 41056). November 19, 1984 -- The amount of bonded indebtedness which may be outstanding at ag one time is the same as that amount which maybe outstanding over the life of the project. -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which.are allocated to the Agency pursuant _to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and-very low income households as defined in'Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: -- That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or increase the supply of -housing for persons and families of low or moderate income or very low income households; or :. -- That some stated percentage less than.20-percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to meet such housing need; or' -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalenfi in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of disp lace ment•of persons of low or moderate income or very low.income households.from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of.increased employment opportunities, or because.of any other direct or'indirect result of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. November. 19, 1984 FINAL P ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT REPORT ON THE PROPOSED TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (EIR 84-5 ) November 1, 1984 Prepared by: Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach 2000• Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 .1 INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1.2 SUMMARY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 .0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION - - - - - 9 MEASURES 3 .1 LANDFORM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 3.2 GEOTECHNICAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 3 .3 WATER RESOURCES (HYDROLOGY) - - - - - - - 13 3 .4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - - - - - - - - - - 23 3 .5 CULTURAL RESOURCES AND ARCHAEOLOGY - - - - - - 23 3.6 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - - - - - - - - - - 23 3 .7 AIR QUALITY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 3.8 NOISE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 3 .9 LAND USE AND PLANNING - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 .3.10 VISUAL/AESTHETICS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 3 .11 COMMUNITY SERVICES AND UTILITIES - - - - - - - 29 3.12 ENERGY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 4.0 ALTERNATIVES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 • 4.1 NO PROJECT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 4.2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES A-F- - - - - - - - - - - - 30 5.0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM - - - - - - 33 USES OF MAN' S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY 6 .0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES WHICH - - - - - 33 WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED 7.0 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED - - - - - - - 33 PROJECT 8.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED - - - - - - - - - 35 9.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 10.0 APPENDIX A. - INITIAL STUDY B. - NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) AND NOP RESPONSES C. - RESPONSE LETTERS FROM SERVING AGENCIES D. - BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT E. - AIR QUALITY F. - NOISE G. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF FLOODING H. - RESPONSE TO COMMENTS LIST OF FIGURES 1. Regional Area 2 2 . Talbert Gap & Project Area 3 3. Existing Facilities 5 4. Preferred Project Alternative F 7 5. Typical Channel Sections 8 6. Topography 11 7. Fault Map 12 8. Peat and Organic Soils . 14 9. Expansive Soil. Distribution Map 15 10. Flood Insurance Rate Map 16 11. Recommended Design Discharges 21 12. Archaeological Sites 24 13. Circulation Plan 25 14. General Plan Land Uses 27 15. General Plan Breakdown 28 16. Channel Reaches 31 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY . 1 .1 Introduction This document is intended to provide an analysis of the environmental impacts of the Talbert Gap Flood Control improvements. The report is prepared in accordance with the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" adopted by. the Secretary of the California Resources Agency on February 3, 1973, and with the Rules and Regulations of the Community Redevelopment .Agency implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended on August 1, 1983. The City of Huntington Beach (Figure 1) lies at the base of the Santa Ana River floodplain. This floodplain has been identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers as the "greatest flood threat west of the Mississippi River ." The Santa Ana River Channel originates at Prado Reservoir in Riverside County and terminates at the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. A federal project for improving the Santa Ana River Channel has been in the planning stages for nearly 20 years. When the project is approved, Huntington Beach and the other affected cities and. counties will be responsible for providing much of the funding. Apart from the Santa Ana River Channel, the City also utilizes an interlocking system of flood control channels and pumping stations which are distributed throughout the City. During the winter storms of 1983 it became apparent that. the existing flood control system within the Talbert Gap (Figure 2) is inadequate to protect the City from flooding. Flood control channel failures in several locations resulted in the flooding of homes and streets in the city. Analysis of the cause of the channel failures has revealed the need for substantial improvements to several components of the flood control system. The areas where needed improvements are necessary have been included within the survey area boundaries. . The City's adopted General Plan contains policies for maintaining the improving flood control in the city. The purpose of this report is to analyze the impacts that will result from whatever modifications or additions are determined to be necessary to the flood control channels, pumping stations and/or retention basins. 1 .2 Summary • The Preliminary Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Project Area has been completed and adopted by the Planning Commission. This plan contains general statements about land uses, layout of principle streets, population .densities, building intensities, proposed (1127d) -1- EIR TALBERT GAP sn, • OEM '.a11111 I�. ��IGe�� :. �: �:w-A Ali. Jliiiirlll :'�i� 1� ■/�111111 ' �� ,`I��I �11!11111�1!1■ MOMd IJNAJA /"� / '�•• NISI 1111� � •ir11Y►� _ �PRS:'L�I���� �'� �:�` ��%mow'_'-'�,� \� -� 1 �i �.i \■mil' � 0 �-5! 9-5-I I 10- -I I DM 9 DM11 CITY OF -11 15-�-11 14 11 HUNTINGTON BEACH DM 18_ D 17 M 15 ; ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA y 24-5\Ic 19-5-II -5-11 21--1�-11 22- _II 2 -5-II 24 DM 2�\ DM 21 DM24 Diu�25 S DM 27 • 1 30-5-11 29-5-11 y- 2 •`�„J,I 27-5-11 2 -5-11 25- -11 /M 35\ DM 34 ��DM 33 p 32 M 31 D \� �C+32-5`11 ! 33 5 II )' 3- -II 35 5 II 5 II \ / DM 36 1 DM 37 -��b 38 39' 40 T 5 6-II I ��--� 3 6-II 2 II DM4 DM3 Q 2 i fill— 1 9 6-11 I 0-6 II 11-g-II 6-10 DM10 1 DM W12 I)M8 14.6 /'17-6 10 o FDMI .., '�j DM19 i 24-6-1 j DM 29 /r PROJECT BOUNDARIES ® TALBERT GAP BOUNDARIES HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA TALBERT GAP & PROJECT AREA PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 2 standards and general impacts of the project upon residents both in and around the Project Area. It serves as the basis for further analysis. In the categories of Geotechnicai Resources, water Resources, Cultural Resources and Archaeology, Land Use and Planning, Visual/Aesthetics, and Community Services and Utilities the environmental impacts will be negligible or of a positive nature. This is due to the fact that most of the proposed improvements will be made within existing rights-of-way. The project will have no broad impacts on Landform but specific portions of it may create minor impacts on existing ground surfaces. Imp&cts `upon Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, Noise and Energy will be of a temporary nature resulting from construction-related activities . Mitigation measures are included in these sections where it is possible to lessen negative impacts on these resources. The biological resources assessment was prepared by Michael Brandman Asociates, Inc. Mitigation measures are cited which if followed would prevent or reduce any significant adverse impacts upon biological resources in the project area. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Talbert Gap Flood Control Area is served by a system of flood control channels and pump stations (Figure 3) . The improvements proposed by this project will be made to these existing facilities. Specifically, the project area is served by the following flood control channels and pump stations: Flood Control Channels f 1. . Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) 2. Talbert Channel (DO2) 3. Fountain Valley Channel (DO5) . City Pump Stations 1. Yorktown P.S. 9211 Yorktown Avenue 2. Flounder P.S. 9731 Flounder Lane 3. Adams P.S. 19961 Chesapeake Lane 4 . Indianapolis P.S. 9221 Indianapolis Avenue 5. Atlanta P.S. 8151 Atlanta Avenue 6. Newland P.S. 8612 Hamilton Avenue 7. Banning P.S. 22011 Malibu Lane County Pump Stations 1. Adams P.S. Adams Avenue The three flood control channels in the project area encompass a total of 7 .6 lineal miles. The Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) is 16,000 feet long and has a (1127d) -4- EIR TALBERT GAP WARNER " SLATER \ TALBERT EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL D05 ELLIS Ir � I Z O O � F J• O M1■ 1 1o1~ ImlGARFIELD HARPER 1 r.. YORKTOWN P.S. CHANNEL r FLOUNDER P. KTOWN ADAMS P.S. i ADAMS r +ti > ADAMS P.S. TALBERT ! INDIANAPOLIS P.S. CHANNEL• D02 + _,.T_A 1A NDIANAMLIS ATLANTA P. MEREDITH P.S. e I i HUNTINGTON BEACH CHANNEL D01 \. •tiS ATLANTA f HAMILTON NEWLAND P.S. P.S.1 ! - NAMILTON BANNING P.S. CITY CHANNELS, SANTA ANA RIVER E01 CITY PUMP STATIONS 1 ANNING • COUNTY CHANNELS \ • r COUNTY PUMP STATION � S.113RCT: H.H. 17l1MM1':l1T1' i"ACTI.ITIFS FIJIMI.MT, MAI 1^ 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA EXISTING FAC I L I T I E S PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 3 right-of-way width which ranges from 100 feet to 300 feet. The Talbert Channel (DO2) is 20,600 feet long and has a right-of-way width which ranges from 80 feet- to 220 feet. " The portion of the Fountain Valley Channel (DO5) . which is within the City of Huntington Beach. is 3 ,600 feet long and has a right-of-way width of 100 feet. The proposed improvements to the flood control channels involve improving flow and capacity within the existing rights-of-way. Seven alternative combinations of improvements have been proposed for the flood control channels. The City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works has indicated a preference for qne of the alternatives (Alternative F) . In this alternative (Figure 4) , Reach 1 on DO2 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel (earthen bottom) , Reach 2 on D01 will be a Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel, Reaches 3 and 4 on D01 will be a Lined Trapezoidal Channel (concrete bottom) , Reach 5 on DO2 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel on the southern half and a Lined Trapezoidal Channel on the northern half. Reaches 6 and 7 on DO2 and Reaches 9 and 10 on DO5 will be Rectangular Lined Channels (concrete bottom) . Cross sections of each channel type are indicated in Figure 5. The ocean outlet, though not actually within the project boundaries, will be at the Santa Ana River mouth. Each of the seven project alternatives will include construction of one or more Retarding Basins to retain excess water until channel flows have been reduced enough to transport the excess water to the ocean. In the City 's selected alternative, Retarding Basins will be constructed at Bartlett Park (Site 6) and the Edison Right-of-Way located along the southern side of Reach 9 on DO5 (Site 3) . The Bartlett Park site is a natural depression which currently serves as an unregulated emergency retention basin. Use of the site as a Retarding Basin will require an expansion of the existing County pump station on Adams Avenue and berming along the eastern boundary of the park, The Edison Right-of-Way site will require excavation of soil and expansion of the existing Flounder pump station. The impacts of construction of these Retarding Basins are addressed in Section 3 .0 of this report. Apart from improvements to flood control channels and construction of retarding basins, improvements may also be made to a number of the existing City owned and operated pump stations. A City survey has indicated that the Flounder Pump Station .is encountering incoming flows much greater than expected which results in localized flooding. Apart from new pumps required at this station for the Edison Right-of-Way Retarding Basin, the fore bay may need to be deepened, incoming lines modified and larger engines added. (1127d) -6- EIR TALBERT GAP Bp Z,': Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel ,l y1 Lined Trapezoidal Channel Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel i �' ... '�\ � :>;�'•.:.: .�Wi!il- Rectangular Lined Channel • t C5`' 1Y'' Ocean Outlet Retarding Basin Required Bridge,or Culvert Improvements (71 \•�`n^� y�\� '�1 PAS Y A. 16 4. .44 ..'�Y[►. t - 'S� /r�` 4sGJ f\ \ lt; t rr �\.s\ , •+ it\ + 6` S\ IM N.lit %. c. '� JAe!rt Reach 3 .ti , Reach 2 f PREFERRED PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE F PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 4 16'M4/NTENANCE �' /p'MA/NTENAnKE I `I I/B'MA ROAOWAY ROAAwAY IN TENANCE I /2'MA/NTENA,�KE ROAOINAV AO I rVAY I I II{'. OR/G NAL - Z ��� CK00OL''�� G O RO ND 45411 GRANULAR \ T BACKF/LL 6RAVEL Q15E SUBORA/N NL _ I _ (GRAYEL, FILTER 5UBDRA/A/ iA)VO NEEPHOLES) XAWWZ�cS,R --��-F-�. 6Rq✓EL BASE PILES REOU/RC-o p/LES REQU/REO FOR wv4FRT SLAB - BOTH 5/DES /N /4! PEAT ARE45 PEAT ARE.j.S LINED TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL RECTANGULAR LINED CHANNEL 3 /B'MAINTENANCE /2'MA/NTENgNCE I /B'MA/NTENANCE ROADN/AY I OAOr✓AY ' I AD`vAY /2'ROADA/E.4YNGE \ SUBORq/N. SUBORA/N \ — C-WCKF/LL (GRAYE L, FILTER (EdA/6-L, FILTER WEEPNOLESJ AND WEEPHOLES) 'i" GRAYEL B.aSE P/LES REQU/REO BOTH 5/0E5 AV PART LINED TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL PEAT AREAS VERTICAL WALL SOFT BOTTOM CHANNEL SOURCE:: ROBERT BEIEI, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES t.w^ HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFOR IA Typical Channel Sections N PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 5 The Indianapolis Pump Station is also encountering greater incoming flows than expected. This station could be improved by replacing two of the smaller engines and pumps with larger units. The Adams Pump Station is capable of handling the incoming flows, but inadequate drainage piping to the station causes street flooding within tracts surrounding the station. If the drainage piping is corrected, then pump modifications will be necessary at the pump station to handle the increased flow. The Yorktown Pump Station is presently under capacity. Replacement of one engine and pump will be required to bring the station up to adequate capacity. The Atlanta Pump Station is in need of a sump pump. The -above mentioned pump station improvements constitute a list of specific improvements which may be made regardless of which alternative combination of channel improvements and retarding basin construction is ultimately selected. The list is not, however , intended to constitute a comprehensive identification of needed improvements. Further study may reveal additional improvements- which may superceed some of those listed. It is possible that flood proofing some or all of the stations to prevent drowning of engines may be determined to be desirable. Regardless of the improvements selected to be made to the. stations, it is expected that all modifications will be made within the existing pump station structures. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 Landform The Talbert Gap is a low lying coastal plain situated between the bluff line along Beach Boulevard and the Santa River Channel. The area is relatively flat with very little variation in topography (Figure 6) . Existing elevations range from approximately sea level .at the south end of the project area to approximately ten feet .above sea level at the north end. The proposed project will have no broad impacts on the landform over the general project area. All of the flood control channels and pump stations are presently in existence and all modifications will be made within existing rights-of-way. Lining of channels and upgrading of pump station engines will have no impact on landform. Three specific portions of the project, . however , may have localized impacts on the landform. (1127d) -9- EIR TALBERT GAP Retarding Basin Site 3 is located within the Edison right-of-way on the south side of Reach 9 of the DO5 channel. The elevation of this site is approximately ten feet above sea level. Construction of this site as a retarding basin will require the excavation of a thirteen foot deep basin. Potential impacts of this action include soil erosion along the sides of the basin. Erosion may be mitigated by constructing the sides at a ratio of no more than 3 to 1 and planting the entire basin with grass. Retarding Basin Site 6 is located in a naturally low lying area and will require no dredging for use as a retarding basin. It is possible, however , that some berming will be required along the eastern edge of the basin. Planting the berm with grass will mitigate the potential for soil erosion. The third possibility .for change in landform will be the Flounder Pump Station which has been identified as possibly needing a larger fore bay. It is possible that this fore bay will be deepened to permit the retention of additional water . Deepening of this fore bay will have no adverse impacts and will require no mitigation measures. 3 .2 Geotechnical Resources The Talbert Gap is located within the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone, as is the entire City of Huntington Beach. This fault zone has substantial potential for seismic activity. As indicated in Figure 7, the Talbert Gap is crossed by the Bolsa-Fairview Fault, the Yorktown Avenue Fault, the Adams Avenue Fault, the Indianapolis Avenue Fault, the North Branch Fault, the South Branch Fault and the Off Shore Fault. Of these faults, the Bolsa-Fairview, North Branch and South Branch faults , constitute the highest seismic risk and the greatest potential for surface rupture. Because of the number of existing faults, it is impossible .to avoid locating portions of the project in or near fault zones. Retarding Basin Site 3 is located directly over the Bolsa-Fairview Fault. The Adams pump station is located over the North Branch Fault and the Newland Pump Station is located over the South Branch Fault. Any improvements to the pump stations in these areas should be in accordance with current Uniform Building Code. earthquake standards. Soils in the project area are generally derived from alluvial materials. They include light, sandy and easily erodible soils of the Bolsa, Myford, Hueneme, tidal flats and beach sediments series. Accumulations of peat and • organic soils exist over portions of the project area. These soils remain from freshwater springs and swamps which existed prior to 1900 when widespread agricultural (1127d) -10- EIR TALBERT GAP LA WARNER 'VI7 -- SLATER l, 1 %�e a o ° C) TALBERT `\J D 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 u. �Q O _ ELLIS - ..-. .._. m =1 A ti A GARFIE lD 1 � 1 I t \ _ YORI, i b _ ADAMS b i - _ INDIANAPOLIS �1 ATLANTA y I �b HAMILTO N 1 BANNING HUNTINGTON BE4CH CALIFORNIN TOPOGRAPHY PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 6 i TALBERT NA.kvmll ' i ♦♦ - ♦ ti'- - �- _ L' 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 ♦fit �� �+... �.♦ ��� `� 0 o V. Z41 TO wl ♦•., „ VE % ♦ ♦ 0 E • 4 - ./ ♦` ^ �NADAMS � �� :..r K ° ,•,'�' . • , :� ;. .ems - 16. ♦ . ( .� ♦ ♦.� ♦ •. qV z F .% .•,. , , \ -. h , ,` i.aww.�. ..: ` R+Yvh.� ,;`as ,,••,,..: ATLANTA , \e1 % p it ♦a $i ! HIGHEST SEISMIC RISK VA (GREATEST SURFACE RUPTURE %`% POTENTIAL WITHIN CITY .1 \`+ MN AREA OF INTENSIVE SHEAR 61` • `� BURIED TRACE OF FAULT (WITHIN 400' ZONE) \ ©UNCERTAINTY AS TO EXISTENCE \ ;Z6-- OR EXTENSION OF FAULT J 0� \ SOURCE:LEIGHTON-YEN&ASSOC. 9-1-73 XR& HUNTINGTON BEACH G4LIFORNIA FAULT MAP PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 7 development began to occur . The approximate locations of • peat. and organic soil deposits are indicated in Figure 8. These deposits represent areas where long-term and large settlements may occur . These locations also present the most potential for liquefaction and ground shaking during a major earthquake. Numerous portions of the flood control channels lie over areas identified as probable locations of peat with area and depth unknown. The deepest peat location (5 ' to 25 ' thick layer of peat) is located under the D01 Channel in the vicinity of Indianapolis Avenue. There is no pump station existing or planned for this area. Figure 9 indicates the locations of expansive soils within the Talbert Gap area. The majority of the project area is comprised of soil with a low percentage_ of clay content. The notable exception is the D01 Channel between Adams Avenue and Hamilton Avenue where the clay content is moderate to high. Expansive clay soils can cause damage to lightly loaded structures such as channel linings. As such, it is important that the design for lining of the DOl Channel take the clay content of the soil into consideration. 3 .3 Water Resources (Hydrology) The Talbert Gap lies within the Santa Ana River Floodplain. The U. S. Army Corp of Engineers has prepared a study (Figure 10) which indicates the extent of flooding which would occur in the event of a 100-year flood of the river . The entire Talbert Gap would be inundated with flooding ranging in depth from 3 feet to 10 feet. The flooding would result from overflow of the river in Anaheim with the escaping water flowing to Huntington Beach outside the river channel and ponding behind the sand dunes along Pacific Coast Highway. The Santa Ana River flood threat, however , is separate from the flooding of the local flood control channels. If the Santa Ana River overflowed, no amount of improvement to the Talbert Valley Channel System would be effective. The proposed project will provide protection from a 100 year storm rather than the much larger event of a 100 year flood. The Talbert Valley Channel System, as described in the Project Description of this EIR, is presently comprised of the Huntington Beach (DO1) , Talbert (D02) and Fountain Valley (D05) channels within the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. Most of the Talbert Valley Channel System currently exists as an unlined earthen leveed channel which was originally designed to convey 65% of the expected 25-year frequency storm flow. Local flooding does occur during storms of less than one day in duration that exceed these original design flow. (1127d) -13- EIR TALBERT GAP 1 i J J 1.3 LA 1 TALBER i r r/ _ 7.• } _ I '�D IDDD 2000 3000 4000 D r GARFIEID r� I Tf / , ! , ADAMS ,. D , _.. ... , ::. - ATLANTA t ! ! I ' ' T 0 PROBABLE LOCATION OF PEAT (AREA& DEPTH UNKNOWN) I' 0 1/2'TO 5'THICK LAYER OF PEAT 5 TO 25'THICK LAYER OF PEAT = OVER 25'THICK LAYER OF PEAT 0 MARSH-1925,1905,OR 1901 / -- INFERRED BOUNDARY SOURCE:ORANGE COUNTY DEPT.OF BLDG.i SAFTY 9-1-73 Aft HUNTINGTON BE4CH G4LIFORNIK PEAT AND ORGANIC SOILS PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 8 WARNER is ..r-y •- K:Pn` � d r4 - i� TALBERT ;"\ll \I i -.•• s=� 0 loon 2000 3000 4000 •.. \ ' O as t cai 0 \ D GARFIELD <A r •.�': .,, - fit.- z5"£ ADAMS WE> i it 1 �.. ATLANTA Mai II } c _ — - - aunt_ � % PERCENTAGE OF CLAY CONTENT ® MODERATE TO HIGH 20%-42% __. 113 LOW TO MODERATE 6%-27% 0 LOW 7%OR LESS h 0 VARIABLE `" REF. U.S.DEPT.OF AGRICULTURE SOIL MAP,(1919) SOURCE:LEIGHTON-YEN 3 ASSOC. 9-1-73 HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA EXPANSIVE SOIL DISTRIBUTION MAP PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 9 c e ..L_ 1 Y ......... . X. � R ::.;.-.... - x e A . .I E ZO E A .... ..... ,�.. �►. 7N (DEPTH$) ZONE V1 ZONE AO ( E L 6) -: (DEPTH ZONE AH (EL 1 1 ZONE AQ (DEPTH 2) Z ZONE AO ZONE C LAB (DEPTH 3) 4, 44 .uw. z ZONE AS ` (EL 11 14 ZONE A 12 (EL 11) ZONE FMILMATICN A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. . AO Areas of 1.00-year shallow flooding where depths /�....,, arr,. betwo n one (1) and three(3) feet; average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood ZONE V / hazard factors are determined. NI Arras of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are —N— br_tween one (1) and three (3) feet; ha%o flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors determined. Al-7,30 Areas of 100-year flood; hasp flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. R Areas betwc+en limits of the 100-year flood and SC0-year f.i(xx3; or certain areas sul)ject to 10(1-year fl xxiing with average depths less than FEBRUARY 16, 1983 Ann (1) foot or where the contri buti nl drainage Area .is ]ens than one ytsrr mile; or arras protectrcl by lames from the haem flood. - FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP C Arras of minimal flor■linl. 01 V Arras.of 100-ymr m,rlal r.lcxrl with volnr_i.ty (wave a. ti.,n); Dane fl,,rrl rlrvatinns and fl«xl fa huntington beach hazardhazardr.Cor�, ,r,t ,Ielrrmincvl. VI-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal flmd with velocity planning division (wnve action); donee flrnd elevations and flood FIGURE l0 hAznrd factors detrrminr�d. During the most recent March, 1983 storms, flooding . occurred along the Huntington Beach, Talbert and Fountain Valley channels causing property damage and hazards to human health and safety. In response to this flooding , the County of Orange Flood Control District has begun planning for the Talbert Valley Channel System flood control improvements. The somewhat unique character of the project area has . resulted in the requirements for extensive detailed hydrologic study before arriving at conclusions regarding engineering for the proposed flood control project. Design constraints include 1) the flat nature of the channel area, 2) tidal influence in the lower reaches 3) historic flooding conditions, 4) the adjacent Santa Ana River and Greenville-Banning Channel, 5) groundwater levels, and 6) location of residences below the existing channel elevations. Tidal waters extend into the channel system from the existing ocean outlet area to the central channel reaches. Reaches 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the channel system experience constant tidal waters while reaches 4 and 6 (in the upper portions) receive only .some tidal influence during high tide. Groundwater in the Talbert Gap area, a part of the Anaheim pressure area, .is confined by overlying bodies of relatively impervious materials and therefore escape from the aquifers to the ' surface is retarded by this aquaclude. Recharge of the basin takes place by underground flow from adjacent, higher .lying basins. Nine aquifers lie within the Talbert Gap designated as the Pico, Main,. Lower RHO, Upper RHO, Omicron, Lambda' , Beta , Alpha, and the Talbert. The Talbert aquifer is the most important source of groundwater in the area acid exhibits high permeabilities. The unit is overlain by fine grained sediments of relatively low permeability and otganic soils of moderate permeability. Because of intensive' water usage from 1930 to 1960`, the Talbert aquifer exhibited increasingly high chloride concentrations from' saltwater intrusion. The Orange County Water District currently operates aln injection barrier system of 23 wells extending along Ellis Avenue in the gap. There are also several extraction wells located along Adams. Recharge of the basin from percolation through the channel bottom is not likely because of the imperviou's strata which range from 50 to 100 feet above the Talbert aquifer . Also, the amount of storm water available for recharge would be minimal during most years. Tidal waters cover most portions of the channel bottom during the day, eliminating a fresh water source. Ground water elevations in the channel are generated from the perched water table found in the sand lenses of the aquiclude. Water conservation using the retarding basin with gravity (1127d) -17- EIR TALBERT GAP recharge wells is a possibility, but the Talbert aquifer lies at least 50 feet below the basin bottom and at present, it would seem to be economically impractical. However , future needs and imported water costs may make infiltration wells feasible in the future The proposed project is located within an 8,540 acre drain age area primarily located on the flat coastal plain in the cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. The drainage area is generally bounded by Warner Avenue on the north, the Santa Ana River on the east, Pacific Coast Highway on the south and Main Street on the west. Of the 8, 540 acres, 3010 acres are tributary to Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) , 1 ,940 acres are tributary to the Fountain Valley Channel (DO5) and the remaining 3,590 acres are directly tributary to the Talbert Channel (DO2) . The Huntington Beach Channel drainage area has an average slope of four feet per thousand, the Fountain Valley Channel has an average slope of two feet per thousand and the Talbert Channel has an average slope of one foot per thousand. Existing drainage improvements within each tributary are as follows: Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) The Huntington Beach Channel is a leveed trapezoidal channel which was constructed with funds from a 1956 bond proposal . The size of the existing channel has. varied little from the original construction except for extensions of the channel to its terminus at Adams Avenue. The existing channel varies in size from a base width of 40 feet at the downstream end to a 20 foot base width at the upstream end. The channel was originally designed to convey 65% of the expected 25-year frequency discharge assuming a fully developed watershed. The channel was originally constructed in 1959 to a point just east of Beach Boulevard. Subsequent extensions were made to Atlanta Avenue in 1964 and to Adams Avenue in 1967. Orange County .facilities which are tributary to the Huntington Beach Channel include D01PO1 , D01PO2, . DOIPO4, D01PO5, and D01PO6, as well as one County pump station (DO1PS1) . The majority of the flows tributary to the Huntington Beach Channel are pumped into the channel at six locations. At the upstream end of the Huntington Beach Channel is the Huntington Beach Pump Station (DOlPS1) which has a capacity of 550 cfs and is operated by the OCEMA. Downstream are the other two major pump stations operated by the City of Huntington Beach, one at Atlanta Avenue and the other at Newland Avenue. The Atlanta Pump Station has a capacity of 619 cfs and the Newland Pump Station has a capacity of 465 cfs. There are three small private pumps, two from the (1127d) -18- EIR TALBERT GAP Huntington-by-the-Sea Trailer Park, and one from the Edison oil tank farm. The peak 100-year frequency discharge delivered to each pump station exceeds the existing pump station capacity. Approximately 118 acres tributary to the Huntington Beach Pump Station flow through an ephemeral marsh located below the bluffs at Coldwater Lane and Adams Avenue, known as Bartlett Park. The storage effect of this marsh was taken into account for retarding the .peak flow at the pump station. The reach of Talbert Channel between the Pacific Ocean and the confluence of the Huntington Beach Channel is an earthen trapezoidal channel. The channel has not been modified from its original construction in 1956. Talbert Channel (D02) Talbert Channel from the Pacific Ocean through Slater Avenue was originally constructed as a trapezoidal earth channel with funds from the 1956 Bond Proposal. The reach from the Pacific ,Ocean to Fountain Valley Channel remains as originally constructed; however , several portions upstream of Fountain Valley Channel have been improved. Improvement of the facility from Fountain Vally Channel to Garfield Avenue with reinforced concrete lining was completed with fiscal 1975-76 funds; . the reinforced concrete box conduit at Garfield Avenue was constructed in 1970; and, the reach northerly from Garfield Avenue to Ellis Avenue was completed in Fiscal 1971-72.- Construction of a reinforced concrete rectangular channel from Ellis Avenue to Talbert Avenue occurred in Fiscal Year 1976777. All flows which reach Talbert Channel between Huntington Beach Channel and Fountain Valley Channel do so by pump stations operated by the City of Huntington Beach. The pump stations at Yorktown Avenue (230 cfs) , Adams Avenue (400 cfs) , Indianapolis Avenue (380 cfs) and Banning Avenue (300 cfs) have been constructed to their ultimate planned capacity. In addition, the City of Huntington Beach operates a pump station at Flounder Drive (150 cfs) which is tributary to Fountain Valley Channel and the City of Fountain Valley operates a pump station at Walnut Street (130 cfs) which is tributary to Talbert Channel near Mallard Avenue. Both of these pump stations have been constructed to their ultimate planned capacity. Fountain Valley Channel (D05) The Fountain Valley Channel is an earthen trapezoidal ,channel that is leveed for only a small portion. The • channel has a 40 foot base width at its confluence with the Talbert Channel and varies to 4 feet at its terminus at Euclid .Street. There are seven culverts on the channel (1127d) -19- EIR TALBERT GAP for road corssings. The channel reach from the confluence at Talbert Channel to Garfield Avenue is currently under construction as a vertical wall channel with a base width which varies from 65 feet to 50 feet. The Fountain Valley Channel was originally constructed from its confluence at the Talbert Channel to Brookhurst Street in 1983. Extensions to the channel were made in 1964 and 1965. The culverts under Ellis Avenue, Bushard, Brookhurst Street and Garfield Avenue were improved in 1965. In 1966, the culvert under the San Diego Freeway was constructed in conjunction with the freeway. At this time extensions were made to the channel to the north of Talbert Avenue. The final extension to the Fountain Valley Channel to Euclid Avenue was made in 1972. During the most recent flooding of the Talbert Valley Channel System during the March, 1983 storm, channel breaks occurred on this channel. Proposed Retarding Basin Site 3 presently contains no channel flows and is not utilized as a part of the existing flood control facilities. Proposed Hydrology (Channels DO1, D02, D05) The proposed flood control project will substantially • improve the carrying capacity of the Huntington Beach, Talbert and Fountain Valley channels. The Hydrology Report for the Huntington Beach Channel facility No. DO1 Entire Drainage System prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, identifies the preferred design discharges for the channels and pump stations under each of the seven alternatives. The increased discharge capacity (Figure. 11) will have a positive impact on the project area. Mita.gation measures will be focused upon maintaining flood protection during construction of the project and maintaining the integrity of the project after it is completed. During construction of the channels, tidal influence may possibly be controlled by constructing cofferdams at the downstream reaches of Talbert Channel . Surface water entering the channel may be controlled by diversion and pumping . Owing to the relatively impervious nature of subsurface soils, lowering of the groundwater utilizing a well point system would be impracticable and costly. An elaborate well point system may cause settlement of adjacent offsite structures. Dewatering may be accomplished in local areas of construction by. creating a sump within the excavations, and continuous pumping . The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) will be i responsible for maintaining the proposed_ channel and (1127d) -20- EIR TALBERT GAP t ►}°�. :fi• .•P''•'��1+��..4 014rry tl1O 9LO .7.aC__Jt.��4r }..f O'aa °tf A•/�'t�r:i.drso��.i 1.r_ ■I FFF 17 .9 -i,•�•:a: T.{ lraK4'�.J�J{O5C t:" ! � 1 Cin�f• � n �'L.._� I� F ° •� r { (" 11�!'.:.::� ammNgroi..c�r1+.� 1070efs ' .�: -•- :� oar 1700 cfe 17 _y II 1446 ac of - 2060 ac L.f G '• q� b. ff +':I �- ` - �;r f w Via? .. w• .. r,..-y•--f _ If: c.... .,.t... . . — M o arper Valley Cha, ,�, n rt;ry i cte -_ o I 1 G :!_1 3940 c t° �� i.... ,�k'..�` / r 27Yorktown P.S. E °a� = a� .o �. ., >4 r/J�rt n° II. �,1 ` .. q •i_r� t ^�tt��� _� 'i •-f . .• -� ..ts:. 9 . r �. �o +ed::�- ex - :I w. I.. `:� _ ._ `� .g,_'` •_.w_ )� t i ..I -�- :►t1 a.a..*I• _-1 �� 4180 ac ... .I� i' -•r^� _ t. t._ _ IwR•r t}.. Opt 19L Ad mi it \ 1 I Adams P.S.P �� +r 1 1548 cfs - �._ 1424ac 1 e. >: d, I./ I COSTA MESA - DO1PO4 _HONTINGTONV a• I CH 1490 sef. _.. .III EACH ." ��. 3150 cfa1, Y _ri r,� j• > -. I .,r°.` 472 I ac JR. Illl rr -y - Indlana{''dia v g `I ,w w �6 - �..y •) ` o'•s �4^ .� --� 'JV•V} - i 2 e.qy rr, 'MUN N "�TA111 Y 1"1t � i• lY.^_i ' i n ' i \ _ Atlanta P.S. sm r .h a, •.da A i �/ I R ~� 2231 cfa v �y 2108 ec E FOR ' ._y w 34n0 C." c . a X Z +,. 50.0 ac f- �' �.a4—.-:r...,'a�=�SI t •� •h - S `•t 1 Tf' .1kh I I '� 7T. ... 1 4` � - --n C tyrr •�� i. I�1 tPi'i 4r�t .� �r .. J cis �i„ •N(aV V f�W �_• � F d �' � +:r. i.l•. !•.:;.� +'t Tp6.;. iaEtpEon 1 i o ''� � t1 ,ti6100 Banning P. i` J•.,- , L`. e EWA i; l/ i W c: i�Eia RI �r'I���. ISPG l ,•1....... :� a ..1 d «tl . do:t �.:�;:.o., tom_•:._��' SOURCE: ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST S ASSOCIATES HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA Recommended Design Discharges PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 11 retarding basin improvements. Access ramps to the channel bottom will be provided in several locations along the • channel alignment. The proposed pump station within Bartlett Park will be designed to become operational during runoff events in excess o.f a two to five year return frequency and thus will not be in regular use. However , the pump station will be kept in working order so that it is ready when needed. The final design of the channels will include subdrain devices and incorporate the proper structural configuration required to prevent failure from buildup of hydrostatic pressure. Hydrostatic pressure will be reduced by including weepholes in the walls and/or parellel drains behind the walls of the concrete rectangular section. Design of the concrete rectangular channel section will also include a heel that is capable of resisting any uplifting forces that may be caused by the rise in the water table. The . construction of a cofferdam to control the tidal backwater and a system of trenches that are deeper than .the design inverts from which the. groundwater would be pumped will be required to control groundwater and tidal backwater . Reaches where the channel is leveed will require a special cross section due to the limited right-of-way. In order to maximize the channel base width that can fit within the existing right-of-way, the channel back slopes will be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, the existing bridge decks or culverts have been preserved to minimize the cost of reconstruction and lengthening of bridges. Side slopes of the Retarding Basin Site 3 will be designed so that they can be easily maintained. The basin floor slopes should be adequate to provide necessary drainage to expedite the drying of the basin bottom between storm events. An emergency spillway will be provided for the passage of flows exceeding the expected peak discharge. A stilling basin is planned to be provided near the basin inlet for sediment collection to help reduce maintenance costs. Special design considerations will be required which are not hydrologically-related to protect the existing power transmission facilities with Retarding Basin Site 3 . The integrity of the foundations must be insured in the event of saturation of the surrounding ground. (1127d) -22- . EIR TALBERT GAP 3 .4 Biological Resources A detailed report including environmental setting , environmental impact and mitigation measures was prepared by Michael Brandman Associates, Inc. For this report please see Appendix D . 3 . 5 Cultural .Resources and .Archaeology The Newland House, located in the City is a valuable property for Historic reasons. Its location is just outside the project area, on the bluffs above the proposed Bartlett Park retention basin. Since the Newland House is outside the boundary of the project area, it would not be disturbed by the proposed improvements. No archaeological sites have been identified in the . project area (Figure 12) . All channel and pump station improvements will be made to existing sites. These sites have been disturbed in previous construction so any valuable resources would already have been discovered or ' destroyed. Excavation may be necessary for certain retention basins. None of these locations are thought to be of value archaeologically. However , if any significant archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation, a licensed archaeologist will be brought on-site to supervise the removal. The Bartlett Park site which has been identified as a potentially important site will probably not require any excavation. If excavation is determined to be necessary., an archeologist should be present for the duration of the work. 3 .6 Transportation/Circulation The existing arterial circulation system (Figure 13) has undergone periodic review and amendment. The proposed project will have no impact upon present circulation other than temporary impacts during construction phases in and around the flood control channels. These impacts may include intermittent traffic stoppage during heavy equipment and truck crossings and the temporary loss of one lane of certain roadways adjacent to construction areas. These impacts are not anticipated to be serious or long term; therefore, standard mitigation measures of rerouting , coning and signing are proposed. 3 .7 Air Quality A report was prepared by The Arroyo Group containing existing conditions, environmental impacts associated with the proposed project and mitigation measures. For this report see Appendix E . (1127d) -23- EIR TALBERT GAP WARNER 1 I 1 ,rb TALBERT g GARFIELD I1 ADAMS f ATLANTA I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES_ f SITE AREA REMAINING SITE AREA DESTROYED f : 145 ORA SITE NUMBERS AS f INVESTIGATED BY.A.R.L SOURCE: A.R.L JUKE 1974 HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES • PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 12 AMENDMENTS c, CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL axmsm Comm „,— STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.4368 DEC.12,1976 LEGEND: FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY MAJOR 454000 PRIMARY_ _30000 SECONDARY -_2-0,000 „I NOTE: _-SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY \ NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY b DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS 's 7 I } itt -O CIO c J a--- i I r� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA c"..13 FIGURE 13 3 .8 Noise Noise impacts from the proposed project are expected only during the construction period. Mitigation measures are not included due to their high cost and the short-term nature of the noise. For more details, please see the Arroyo Group's report in Appendix F. 3.9 Land Use and Planning The project area encompasses 2 ,022 acres and is general planned for a mixture of residential, -commercial and industrial uses (Figure 14) . As indicated in Figure 15, the majority of the area (87%) is planned as residential. Most of this area is low density single family. There are nine commercial areas located in the project area which constitute four percent of the total area. Eight percent of the project area is planned for public, quasi-public, institutional. Within this area are seven elementary schools and one high school and flood control channels. Retarding Basin Site 3 is presently zoned R1 (Low Density Residential) . The Retarding Basin will preclude residential development. Under any circumstances residential development is unlikely, however , since the site is within the Edison right-of-way. The overhead high voltage wires make the site unsatisfactory for residential • use. The other retention basin site, Bartlett Park, is designated as open space in the General Plan and will be designed to retain its natural state. The proposed project would further policies and objectives found in the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Seismic-Safety Element and the Community Facilities Element. These documents indicate policies that encourage the -upgrading of critical public facilities and indicate the City's intent to correct existing deficiencies in order to prevent disaster and to provide adequate services to the community. Redevelopment of the Project area will not significantly affect its present land use structure (Figure 15) . Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 3. 10 Visual/Aesthetics Most of the existing flood control channels have earthen bottoms. The sides slope towards the bottom and in some places have weeds growing on them. The proposed improvements may include dredging the bottom and excavating to make the sides more square. This will allow a greater capacity and flow. In some areas the sides and (1127d) -26- EIR TALBERT GAP Land Use Categoric i ` i i�. DENTIAI, ®L-w Dens; t-v Medium Density 1 ftigh Dens: �-.v COMM 'RCIAT. J I ,Weneral .. �1�.... Visitor - Serving al I Jj } '. �:", � ,� j Eri .F. CFI I INDUSTRIAL General OPEN SPACE - 1 � Recr.eiticij II�rrm- r fe I E R F-I i� Is I I I•{ I I .�I LF E I j I i � j'• � Ji . . Public 1 �'. i I -- - 0 . ,4ua�i-Publ . I IL � 1, ,� ---- _'t 5't d---'�' 1 Institutional ; 1 , , �� :I ;�d I CF- Planned Cc•:nmunit l I 1 : ' 1 - ,� Planning Reserve I Irk'— a.LT K I} r __ J C �T'�� u If('^_..'']'-1)4:;.�u+• i ,Ij117 •1 '� J I ! I 1- � P - ,/1\ � �: ''�I,�11� .—• - i I) 1 ��� '11 � �, 1`; iL•.�If I ��I�. I Il��� ��I�"�'. j i 1 . jI ,��` ',JI 'i I �{ 1'I� g ei ;III ` F 1 F� 4-1 I _ mill /. FE ': �,� � - -i. _ —s � _ _ — -' P= �.-iz14.�A-r i;�.�t•a nurtrJ�L 1 � RiIt r ITTrl,- GENERAL PLAN As LAND USES WITHIN tip„ F ;, : ;i: {{ ! ; :�.•4FROJECT AREA .a FIGURE 14 � .�._ �','�,� �^.7:•l�; i PERCENTAGE Of LAND USE TYPE ++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++.++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++ . +++++++++++++++++++++++++.. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++RESIDENTIAL-+++++++++++ +++++++++++ -+++++++++++ +++++++++++ 87% -++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++-r-r-r-r---r-r++++++++++++- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-' ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ' COMMERICAL +++++++++++++++++++++-f-++1 ' ++++++++++++++++++++- 4% ++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++ INDUSTRIAL ++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ l% ++++++++++++++++++++++.. +++++++++++++++++++++++, +++++++i-+++++++++++++++++ - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++.. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++, PUBLIC ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.. 8% ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++� ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++' . ++++++++++++++++++++++++� ++-+++-F+++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++-f-+++ MHUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN BREAKDOWN PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 15 bottoms of the channels may be lined in concrete. In other areas only the sides may be lined, leaving earthen bottoms. Concrete sides will eliminate the growth of weeds and provide a neater , although less natural, appearance. Aside from the conversion to concrete sides, visual appearances will remain the same. The project is not expected to produce new light or glare. 3 .11 Community Services and Utilities All services and utilities are presently being supplied without capacity or service problems. Since no new construction of homes or buildings is proposed and the project will not result in a population increase in the area, there is not expected to be an increased demand for services and utilities. Pump station engines are fueled by natural gas. The addition or upgrading in size of these engines would result in a slight increase in the. demand for natural gas especially during . rainy periods. Southern California Gas Company, the supplier , would not be affected by the additional demand. 3. 12 Energy Land use in the area is largely residential with a small percentage of commercial use. These uses consume various forms of energy, including electricity and natural gas. The electricity is supplied by Southern California Edison Company and the gas is supplied by Southern California Gas Company. Supply in the area outweighs demand. Lining the channels will require gasoline and diesel fueled trucks and equipment which will require an additional energy expenditure in the Redevelopment Area. This short-term energy use will be unavoidable but energy consumption will fall back to existing levels upon completion of the project. No mitigation measures are included in this report since there are no substantial or long-term impacts. 4 .0 ALTERNATIVES 4 .1 No Project The "no project" alternative would result in the elimination of many beneficial and a few adverse impacts associated with the project. The major benefits of the • "no project" alternative are the absence of the project' s negative environmental impacts and the savings of considerable public expense. The "no project" alternative would reduce funding availability for improvement of the (1127d) -29- EIR TALBERT GAP f existing flood control system. Leaving the area prone to local flood risk would cause residents and businesses to remain vulnerable to the destruction of property and the possible loss of human lives. 4 .2 Project Alternatives As indicated in Section 2 there are seven alternatives for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Project. The alternative F which has been indicated as preferable by Public Works will include retarding basins at Bartlett Park (Site 6) and the Edison Right-of Way (Site 3) . Channel improvements will vary according to location. Figure 16 indicates channel reaches within the project area. Reach 1 of D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel, Reach 2 of D02 will be a Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel, Reaches 3 and 4 on D01 will be a .Lined Trapezoidal Channel, Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel on the southern portion and a Lined Trapezoidal Channel on the northern portion. Reaches 6 and 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be the Santa Ana River mouth. The pump station improvements will be the same for all of the alternatives. Alternative A will include a retarding basin only at the • southeast corner of Atlanta Avenue and Magnolia Street (Site 4) . Reach 1 of D02 and Reach 2 on D01 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reaches 3 and 4 on .D01 will be a Rectangular Lined Channel. Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Rectangular Channel. Reaches 6 and 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at Brookhurst Street. Alternative B will include the Atlanta Magnolia Retarding Basin (Site 4) and the Bartlett Park Retarding Basin (Site 6) . Reach 1 on D02 and Reach 2 on D01 will be Part Lined Trapezoidal Channels. Reaches 3 and 4 on DO1 will be a Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reaches 6 and 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at Brookhurst Street. Alternative C is the City's second preferred alternative. Retarding Basins will be located at Bartlett Park (Site 6) and the Edison Right-of-Way (Site 3) . Reach l on D02 and Reach 2 on D01 will be Part Lined Trapezoidal Channels. Reaches 3 and 4 on D01 will be a Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 6 on D02 and will be a Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at Brookhurst Street. (1127d) -30- EIR TALBERT GAP d,P / O0 10 el X. NN t \� \�►� 00 je 'r.. F � 'f � ; �\`f'�\1� � \� � 7��,• �Q��1�� ���'1�,.,ice�"\.�'.\!�\\ll�`� 4\�+,_ - tip` s�:� .%:�: � � "�.• � ^� �;; � � Reach 2 \ ' ` Reach 3 Re ., WIMP \ V HUNTINGTON BEACH CG4LIFORNIN CHANNEL REACHES PLANNING DIVISION FIGURE 16 Alternative D will include Retarding Basins at the Atlanta/Magnolia (Site 4) and Bartlett Park (Site 6) . Reach 1 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel . Reaches 2 , 3 and 4 on D01 will be a Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel. Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at the Santa Ana River mouth. Alternative E will include a Retarding Basin only at Bartlett Park (Site 6) . Reach 1 on D02 and Reach 2 on D01 will be Part Lined Trapezoidal Channels. Reaches 3 and 4 on D01 will be a Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel. Reach 5 and the southern half of Reach 6 on D02 will be a Vertical Wall Soft Bottom Channel. The northern half of Reach 6 and all of .Reach 7 on D02 , and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at Brookhurst Street. Alternative G will include Retarding Basins at Atlanta/Magnolia (Site 4) and Bartlett Park (Site 6) . . Reach 1 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 2 on D01 will be a Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reach 5 on D02 will be a Part Lined Trapezoidal Channel. Reaches 6 'and 7 on D02 and Reaches 9 and 10 on D05 will be Rectangular Lined Channels. The ocean outlet will be at the Santa Ana River mouth. Selecting Alternative F as the preferred alternative and C as the second preferred alternative involved three major factors. Both alternatives show retarding basins located at .Site 6 (open space owned by the City). and Site 3 (a power line easement owned by Southern California Edison Company) . These preferable sites lie on undevelopable land while the other retention basin sites are prime locations for future development. Choosing Sites 3 and 6 as the only economically feasible locations for retention basins limits the Alternatives to F and C. Both of these alternatives also include sections of "part lined trapezoidal channel" which would probably mean the channel bottoms would not be lined in concrete but left in their natural earthen state. This treatment is favorable according to the Public Works Department of the City. Alternative F is preferred over Alternative C because it does not require the relocation of the ocean outlet to Broo.khurst Street. Moving the ocean outlet would divide up the beach which is an important, valuable resource to the City. Selection of Alternative F would allow the ocean outlet to remain in its existing location, would locate a retention basin at Bartlett Park and one at the Edison Right-of-Way and would include Part Lined Trazpezoidal Channels. (1127d) -32- EIR TALBERT GAP • 5. 0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY There may be short-term negative impacts of a temporary nature during construction of the project. Noise and dust emmissions will likely impact homes immediately adjacent to channels which are undergoing dredging and concrete lining. There may also be short-term traffic impacts resulting from transportation and use of heavy equipment. In the dredged and concrete lined portions of the channels, there may be some displacement of vegetation and wildlife over the -long-term. These impacts, however , must be measured against the overriding long-term benefits which the project will provide the neighborhoods, residents and businesses within the Redevelopment Project Area. The projected improvements will expand the capacity and performance of the existing flood control system thereby reducing the local flood hazard. The project will in effect mitigate a. very serious problem in the Talbert Gap and ensure the area 's long-term productivity. 6 . 0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED 'IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED The proposed improvement project represents. a semi-permanent commitment of land for . flood control uses. Although most of the project site currently exists as a network of earthen-lined drainage channels, cement-lining of these waterways will make it more difficult to rehabilitate the site in the future for alternative land uses. However , such acommitment of land will help_ mitigate a serious flood hazard that has become unacceptable to continue. Lining of the channels may result in displacement of some vegetation and wildlife. The construction of the proposed project will involve the . irretrievable commitment of energy supplies and material resources. Facility construction will involve a depletion of building materials and non-renewable resources such as gasoline, natural gas and oil which will .be used to operate construction vehicles and other equipment. Additional natural resources which may be used during construction include, but are not limited to lumber , sand and gravel , steel and water . 7.0 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project will improve the existing flood control system, and raise the level of flood protection in the Talbert Gap. The improvements proposed under .the various project alternatives will not of themselves induce growth beyond general planned development intensities (1127d) -33- EIR TALBERT' GAP -within the Project Area. Approximately six percent (118 acres) of the Project Area are currently vacant, but planned for residental, commercial, and industrial uses. The proposed improvements may have the effect of hastening development of these areas, but such development will be consistent. with General Plan goals and policies, and will (as with existing uses) enjoy a higher level of protection from flood hazards. The creation of retention basins in some areas designated for residential or commercial uses may have a growth reducing impact depending upon the ultimate project alternative selected for implementation. This project will have incremental effects on air quality, water quality, traffic noise, and public services during the construction phase, but should be mitigated by acting in accord with General Plan policies and City ordinances. • (1127d) -34- EIR TALBERT GAP 8. 0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED City of Huntington Beach Police Department Jay Mark Civil Defense Department Paula Burkenfield Public Works Les Evans Bruce Gilmer Mike Loving Water Department Robert Taylor KatzHollis 550- S. Hill St. , Ste. 890 Los Angeles, CA 90013 - 2410 Contact: Allen Robertson Jennifer Coile Michael Bran_dan Associates 3140 Redhill Ave. , St. 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Contact: Larry D. Hunsey Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates 1401 Quail St. Newport Beach, CA 92658-0346 Contact: Richard Broming The .Arroyo Group 40 East Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91105 Contact: Pat Mann (1127d) -35- EIR TALBERT GAP 9. 0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 . Archaeological Research Incorporated, Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory, Technical Version, January, 1973 . 2. City of Huntington Beach, Community Facilities Element, May,1981. 3 . City of . Huntington Beach, Hunting Beach General Plan, June, 1984 4 . City of Huntington Beach, Noise Element, August, 1976. 5. City Of Huntington Beach, Seismic-Safety Element, October, 1974. 6. Ferderal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps, City of Huntington Beach, February, 1983. 7 . Leighton-Yen and Associates, Geotechnical Inputs, City of Huntington Beach, February, 1974.. 8. Orange County EMA-Engineering Services Division Development, Hydrology Report, Talbert Channel Facility D02 Entire Drainage System, September , 1976. 9. Orange County EMA-Engineering Services Division- Development, Hydrology Report, Fountain Valley Channel Facility D05, Entire Drainage System, August, 1973. 10. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Hydrology Report Huntington Beach Channel System, August, 1984. 11. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports, December , 1983 . (1127d)_ -36- EIR TALBERT GAP APPENDIX A INITIAL STUDY i APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Complete,! By Lead Agency) I. Background I. Narne of Proponent City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency 2. Address and Phon-ije Number of Proponent 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA (714) 536-5271' 3. Date of Checklist Submitted August 3, 1984 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Huntington Beach, Development 'Services S. Name of Proposal, f applicable Talbert Gap Project AVCA i r!. Environmental Impacts (Fxplanot:ons of all !'yes!' and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes may No 1 . Foi th. Will the proposal result in: n. Unstable earth conditions or in changes X r geul�*gic'substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compoction or overcoyering of the soil? _ + X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief' features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification Of any unique geologic or physical features? _ , X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? R f. changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify th( channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 309 Yes Moy No g. Exposure .of people or property to geolo- gic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. ("hanges in absorption rates, drainage pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface X runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X S waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in X any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of_ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 310 Yes Mee No �-. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, tend aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any. species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the X migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife X habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a -sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned X land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X 311 Yes M be No b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable X natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. wll the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or X upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation X plan? .11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, - distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing. hous- X ing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: . a. Generation of substantial additional X vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or X demand for new parking? c. impact upon existing transpor- X Cation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- X Lion or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air X traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the X following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X 312 Yes M2ybe No d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e.. Maintenance of public facilities, including X ., :, , roads f. Other governmental ices? X 15. Energy. Will- the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b Substantial increase in demand upon exist- irg sources of energy., or require fhe` 8eyelop new sources n w energ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need . for new'systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c: Water? X d. Se..wer or septic tanks? - - X e. -Storm water. drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human ;Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential X health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health X hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic .vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open X to public view? 19. rreption. Will the proposal result in an act upon1. the quality or quantity of existing X recreat ions I oppor:tun it ies. 20. Cultural Resources. Ir V, a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or X historic archaeological site? 313 Yes Ma be No b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or X historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect X unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact X area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of. the environment, r substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population. to drop below self sus- taining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant.or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or -animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods X of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to S achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- teem impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts X will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does-the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) 314 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect — on the environment; and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. x Date Sig natlire (/ For (Note: This is only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise their own format for initial studies.) 315 ADDENDUM TO . INITIAL STUDY 3 - b. There should be an increase in the amount of surface runoff because of the smaller percentage of absorption with a concrete lined channel . 3 - e. Water quality should increase. 3 - g . Because of the reduction in absorption from the concrete lining, water in the channel will not percolate into the ground water. 4 - a . It is anticipated that there may be a decrease in fish life which reside within the channels. 5 a . After lining the channel it will take approximately 2-3 years for aquatic life to return. 6 . There will be a temporary increase in noise levels during the construction phase of the project. • APPENDIX B NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) AND NOP RESPONCES • LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES NOTICE OF PREPARATION EIR NO. 84-5 Notice is hereby given that the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Development Services, has initiated the preparation of Environ- mental Impact Report on a proposal by the City of Huntington Beach . Redevelopment Agency to designate approximately 3 .44 square miles of land as a Redevelopment Project Area. The subject property has the following boundaries: From the northeast corner of Magnolia Street and Garfield Avenue, continuing east alon,4 Garfield to Brookhurst Street, south along Brookhurst Street to Yorktown Avenue, then west to Bushard- Street, south along Bushard to Banning Avenue, then east to Brookhurst, southwest along Brookhurst to the northern boundary of the Orange County Flood Control District, then along said Channel DO2 to the City limits; then southwest along City boundary to the. south flood control boundary. Following the. southern southern boundary of the flood control channels (DO-2 and generating plant. Again, following the southern and western botndaries of the flood control channel (DO-.l) to Atlanta Avenue, we!7t along Atlanta to Beach Boulevard, then south along Beach Boulevard to the limits of the residential development; then • vrest to Delaware, north along Delaware Street to Atlanta, and then following the bluffline until it approaches Newland north of Ellis at Newland, south along Newland -to Atlanta, east along_ Atlanta to Magnolia, and then north along Magnolia. Street to the City limits. The anticipated improvements within .the Redevelopment Project Area include the .following: Increasing the capacity of the existing flood control channels and reconstructing them with concrete lining; .improving the existing pump stations and adding pumping units where necessary; there will also be a construction of retention basins where needed. Any person or persons wishing to comment as to the scope and content of the environmental information relative to the project may do so within a 30-day period of the publication of this notice ending September 3, 1984 . Written comments should be sent to the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. S�C�GE 1`�.7i .,e iy ' • Directors � } Officers W JOHN ~I v PHILIP L.ANTHONY D � .� Z President GARTHE esident KATHRYN L.BARR —A ROBERT L.CLARK Y 46 JOHN V FONLEY JQ First Vice President DONN HALL JOHN V.FONLEY T7�N ,NC LAWRENCE P KRAEMER,JR. JOHN GARTHE �)f Second Vice President LAWRENCE P.KRAEMER.JR. _ AUGUST F LENAIN LANGDO .CLINE NOBLEJ. W.OWEN ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Secretary ManagerNOBLE J.WAITE August 27 , 1984 Mr. Charles W. Thompson City Administrator City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Thompson: Proposed Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area - The District has reviewed the subject Preliminary Redevelopment Plan for its potential detrimental fiscal impact upon the District. Since the District ' s state-mandated function is management and replenishment of Orange County' s groundwater basin, any proposed redevelopment project is analyzed in terms of creating an additional demand on the common groundwater supply. The subject redevelopment plan has been designed to simply improve the capacity of existing flood control channels , improve and/or add pump station units and possibly construct a retention basin in order to provide better flood protection in the Talbert Gap area. These planned improvements will not appreciably add to the : existing water demand within the essentially built-out proposed project area. Therefore, the Orange County Water District does not foresee a detrimental fiscal impact from the proposed project and has no objection to its implementation. Very truly yours, Paula Martinez Property Manager ` ! CC : George Rebella County Administrative Office 10500 ELLIS AVENUE•PO.BOX 8300 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728 TELEPHONE(714)963-5661/556-8260 HUNTINGTON BEACH MURRAY STORM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR, EMA r 4 U NTY O F TO FISHER DIRECTORR O OF F PLANNING ..r AUG 2 ) LOCATION: 12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA P.O. BOX 4048 5 "` 3 RANG E P.O. Box 190 SANTA ANA,CA 92702-4048 - ' " ;•■ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY SANTA ANA,CA 92702-4048 PLANNING TELEPHONE: (714)834-4643 August 29, 1984 . FILE City of Huntington Beach Department of Development Services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . Subject: NOP. EIR 84=5, Redevelopment Plans for 3.44 Square Miles in. Huntington Beach Dear Sirs: The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Preparation EIR 84-5 Redevelopment Plan for 3.44 square miles in Huntington Beach, and offers the following comments. The subject pro.ject.area is within the study boundary of the Environmental Management Agency's (EMA) Santa Ana River Mouth Public Works -- Wetlands Enhancement Plan/Local Coastal Program and Talbert Valley Flood Control Project. Close coordination between City of Huntington Beach and .this division should be pursued in the planning process to provide appropriate flood protection and necessary wetlands enhancement to mitigate any potential biologic impacts that could be generated from this project. It is also recommended that the County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) be contacted and consulted early in the planning and design process to ensure smooth coordination_ of the subject project with EMA's.Flood Control Project and Santa Ana River Mouth Plan: Attached for your consideration are copies of memorandum from Director of Public Works to EMA, Director of Planning and consultant's scope of work for Environ- mental Impact Report for Talbert Valley Channel System. The Agency looks forward to reviewing the Draft EIR when it is available and would appreciate receiving four copies. Please send them to the undersigned for coordination of the environmencai review process. Very truly yours, Alex A. Ghobadi Environmental Analysis Division AAG:mh �' Attachments County ®f Orange DATE: August 24, 1984 Robert G. Fisher rO• Director of Planning DEPT/DIST: EMA FROM: Carl . R. Nelson, Director of Public Works EMA S �o BJECT: Notice of Preparation EIR No. 84-5, City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency This is in response to a memorandum from F. W. Olson, EAD, informing Design C staff of the proposed subject EIR to designate approximately 3.44 square miles of land as a Redevelopment Project Area. We have the following comments: 1. The purpose of the redevelopment agency is stated as follows "The anticipated improvements within the Redevelopment Project Area include the following: Increasing the capacity of the existing flood control channels and reconstructing them with concrete lining; improving the existing pump stations and adding pumping units where necessary; there will also be a construction of retention basins where needed." The redevelopment agency includes the Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) , Talbert Channel 002) from the ocean to Carfield Avenue, and Fountain Valley Channel (D05) from Talbert Channel to Garfield Avenue. The proposed improvement by the redevelopment agency will not prevent the greater flood. threat from the Santa Ana River. 2. Any future agreements with Orange County and the redevelopment agency shall require that the Orange County Flood Control District retain the same percentage of any increase in taxes as the base allocation provides at the present time. 3. In the event that a reduction in revenue to the Orange County Flood Control .District results, then all funding responsibility for flood control maintenance and operation should be transferred to the City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 4. All improvements within Orange County Flood Control District right-of-way . by the redevelopment agency, shall be according to Orange County EMA standards and specifications and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/EMA. All contract administration, and construction inspection shall be performed by EMA and funded by the redevelopment agency. 5. The EIR for projects proposed by the redevelopment agency should include the items covered in the two attached scopes of work. Carl R. Nelson Director of Public Works RDR:lcc CC: F. W. Olson, EAD Attachment: Scope of Work for EIR for the Talbert Valley Channel System Scope of Work for Marine Resources Analysis Component ATTACHMENT A • MARINE AiESOURCES ARALYSIM COMPONENT TASK A: BENTHIC SAMPLING The benthic invertebrate fauna of the Talbert Channel will be characterized by sampling four stations arranged approximately equidistant along that extent of the channel which is determined to tie subject to tidal influence (determination t+) be made by salinometer readifigs taken zit various inland points). The four stations grill be .loested as follows: channel mouth, furthest inland extent of tidal influence, two at intermediate liohits: Three 1=liter (O:f11 min) samples of :sediment will be collected with a hand held box corer device. at each sampling station and will be representative of the various. sediment regimes occurring along the channel. TASK B. FISH POPtA.ATION ASSEgSNIE T Shallow water fish populations of the channel will be sampled at the four sampling :stations using a small inesh, 30-foot beach seine net. Fish conimonly caught in the beach seines represent species that ace characteristic of shallow waters and which, to varying deg sees; depefid upon the habitat for feeding, spawfifrig, or in the cas.:e of some species.which borrow into the mncl, for a dwelling place. Species will be identified and individuals counted to obtain a catch bioni,iss weight • for each replic,-Lte seine sarilple taken. All fishes catight will be roletised with the exception of one individual of cacti species which will be retained for a voucher coll�_'c'ion. T�'K C. LAF3OFAToRY ANALYSI> In the laboratory, the benthic samples will remain in the formalin solution fro;n 48 to 72 Hour, for fixation of the organisms. After fixing, the samples will be rinsed in fresh water on a 0.5--mm screcil to remove excess formalin and any remaining fine sediments, then transferred to 70 percent isopropyl alchohol for preservation. The rescreened sample will then be sorted to remove all retained orm'nisms. The organic and inorganic residue will be scanned by supervisory personnel for organisms mired -by the sorters, r.,hich, if found will be recombined with the organisms removed by the sorters. All organisms found will then be id.^.ratified to the lowest taxonomic level permitted by available information. Gross estimation of the abundance cf each species will l,e made. Each sampl^ will then be wet-weight biomassed to obt:-dn an esthnate of the standing crop of invertebrates per unit of surfac-c area. Representative specimens will be nddod as ,required to a reference collectioaI as vcucliers of the identifications. TASK D. DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING An in depth report will be prepared detailing the marine biological resources that exist in the coastal reach of the Talbert Channel. The analyses will include: • comprehensive species lists, dominant species, estimates of abundance, estimates of standing crops, (biomass) and subtidal and intertidal habitat descriptions. The presence of rare, endangered or threatened species will be noted and discussed. !4-011,' ill WO I'll .o i -i 't -L f l: I I iiip.i t 1, I)m for the '.*.I 11,vvt V:111 cs' Cllallill.'I, S V. S L'e m 1 . :)..j C t Ve h, analysis ;,rd I dk-)L,uuwut:.it. Lon preparation is required -L") produce a Dr.-lit and Final E'nvii-ozimentA Impact Repo,-L (1`11() for t.hu cment of the F,11I1. I"CeillUrlitl Valley c1iannel.,;. .1�;I)r k-iv L)CI-t ZU1, J,roparation of the I)r,,.ft Final. El", !;Il;il.l bc perfuiwed in a(:_cordance W' lli t!l(.: provisions Of "lle C.Ilifo-1-!iia Qtl.Aity Act. , aild t.I,.(, laity Gu i d C,I ines, a d k-l)t .11 01%Ill V,U COUP t. Pr0`,l(1U!'L:S ,mid L I te County s EA 1, i jo k 1.1 St.'(1-pt- of Sol Vices 11 o A I/E- Sllall !.0 ('01111 t.V ill LIU! I(!!- i011 Q f tIIC 1111 L i-)I St Lid Y ,I-d the of tile Not licu of Prvpar.ition by ftirni!A-Ling pert I tic:n t: A .`.:hall i pt 1" !A I L I CII a I I d 101'. f Of C:!CIL of the (:riv i ronmen tag C. :md D. bClo%A:. Rc:iearch and i�l.jt i()lI 1.IC1LIdC , b"tc llo' I,)(- to, t-he review of pc v i o I I, t I ::I\,i I oi;ll;Clll .1 1 dtl( LJI:'('Ii L 1.1 it,il , CX i iiq, land uses C: C-( .'Il.l;i Vi COL.I'd i 1..1 t i 4.)-,l I i id c i i c IL 1,;i t It o t I i(. r e rn i I% a it d 1,11 C i L i f Iltilitiliptoll ls.:.:!Cll :,Iwe, Corps of I n c c r s 1 T U D c p'l r till, 1 1)4 -.11, k !.11 zwid lo, it a -il if or n i;I;I I G omm i i o I I, C, Ll:lv.;[ of Oi C.!Iihjj -!i:. Uo; Z,ct_%iL:itt (A P,lrk!: and Iterreation, I , Y Tl t De IM,I t :1t 1 1 1 �-ll r C C' :T L1.0 IiC!J.011a I WA L 1 y I B 1 d 4' J III V,1 V!; z i I(I I U U a r C 11 f 0 C L I'L' 0 0 SUbconsultatit may bc AlP t this wo, (Or h i S C 0?l';'.j I L i ltJ S 1 1 l2v 1 L,ci I I i e d t o perform the follow ins e x tci-.itur,� p.�i-taining LU the Li biological U 1'C'C S f t.1.40 ?)1-(1 f.:C t Zl I CliArinei , Huntington Beach. ..ix I)OtcflLial retarding basin o n c.L s 'I r.C two i t. I I j t i , o.. u.t I . adjacent natural a 1 va L; W-1 11 b".: -olllpi l,.J , vevi,,wc d and -iti;jlvzed. Potc-ntial signif icant 1 wi I i be I(!,,:ii t. i f i o d and c:d to vAle extent permitted L 1'. a Ve! hom f .;nrvov. 'iho ci,tire project area uhall b(.-- !:.(ll the ch.-:racter of its biolovical rc6ourccs vey V!nph,li;i:, !:h:t i I IW di 17CC tLd LC) .111 mitura I areas including ttic exi L iz),• soft bot ton, C11M.liel bcd., L lie poCeIlLial retarding . `�a:;in .sites an.l 'I' Ca ; ad AC1!1lt to ter near- the Talbert and iluntinl;tun i,c:;,rh thanuuh hi.:b ..: rat: as "wvl land.,;" or h;lvc :;uch potential. a,. cu;u:' ifv biolo ic;:l resoucchs Where appropriate , biotic _.L------ --l_. ... ------ — -- communities pre:;ent in the project area shall be mapped and the areal coverage of each will be quarLified cartoKi-aphiccllly. 4. Prepare species inventory lists . Bascd upon site survey observations , a. cumprehensive list of site flora and fauna will be prepared. Both lists will hu arranged taxuncn;ticall.: and follow the mo:t current published nomenclature. The flora list will include species ;abundance and habitat inforpaL i.un , in addition to not.at ion of native or introduced status. The faunal Boot Wili comprise speciun observed juring the project area survey (dirczi-ly , or detected by ::ells , tracks , ncat , wits) plus thoSQ expected t.'! inhabit o.I fre,ucrlt tllt: habitats prouent within tt,e project area . 5. 1dvnt i t v and :i—" ronsit i ve Potential presuncc on t_he site A .ally plants, wildlife and/or habitats considered Parr , l'::d::ll;.',t`rt'a , I hry a Euned, urn Arive ("r• ot Ile l-Wise unl(pic—by tov.ernment as"•rnAUS (e.g. , California Apartment of Fish and Caine , U.S. fish and Wildikc Service) or recugllOod conservation orgi-nlizations V.P. , Calilornia Native Plant :,ociuty, A"dubun Society, COMM,; .Jrsnral Div t '. itY Data Base) will be d(•tcrmined . Wildlife species tt+ Coal 'ra i.p oU n Lo occur Within thv regio:i occupied by the proJ(_ct r•. uc!C•. lc t ;! fooliv r;iV i1icon! 01AA:C1 ., . A11 -pot (`iItinIly ,;Knificant ~ 'i t•: I cL t. l;ai!:: t: c(dv.!l .'t' alit, 11t:l,(•11l• isl ) upon biological : e: !:u: e,`:, rt-:.ril- in , lrum the pro ;cct twill be a_;sessed. Where oppru!`t iate , prgwseA h;lbicir removal :hpl! be quantified by haLitnt 7 _ _ ro:•:.:ulr;tc• all,l recu:n:r:�•l::'. uIl1.I �:,t loll ,•��.�':l::sslcl;/alteru:,tivea 1•lr:.lsures Or 01MIMP e , Lo 1!l(lliMine or eliminate putelltiall.y adverse impact.,. "po.1 Liolo iva l resource, wi l i be racoimunded for consideration. l.IA'. illclude tul(:idcratir.n of compensatory on or Mi _-ite wetland enhancemonL :and California ier.;st tern colony protection/ i`lUi:at IOIl. lIot.u:lienz. :tlf-fm tion and F1t1MEs inforry :lull developed in the 1-. 0-p—o- -ed accor:fit:g Ao accepted scientific and tei:hUiCa _ .•Landards. however, to the: extuht possible , roport iaunrvaKtt Alauld be :ic signed for understandiu; by ttie lay reader. maintain coocAinarion with uth('r a cnc.ie ;. Regular communication will be innincained with Lhe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Dvpartmetlt. of Fish and Came, avid U.S. Army Corps of Engineers : n assure that the result of Phu biological resources, work program arc: appropriate to the ::at isfac;.i.on of the County of Orange's D. The A/E shall ptopnso 0 romplKe Draft QK which andlyzes , describe: and evaluates a L I rMant ial t nvi runvw"LAI 0 p"cts A the proposed project . Topic areas to receive pirt. inular cmphanis include: 1 . Landform, Geology , Soils And ScLamiciry Hydrology 3. Water Resources Biological Re.-,uurcos, .5. Land Plannin,,; 6. Circulation 'i . Air Quality P . Noise 16. QfLural/ScienLific Renunrcm 11 . Lltilitic!; and Srrvico__' F. &AAbits will be an inE2gral portion of the EIR. Ekbibits will be 1!.';L.: ! E" describc , evaliate and analyze information. The A/E shall 1L r !Nnmoible jor khopreparatiun of all nevennary exhibits to accomplish hL St' QA 10 F. Co"cur! ynt ALL : 40 C"MP101- ion of Lhu Olaf! El%, or ShorAy Lhereafter, ME AM submit n injailed SC K pi-cpo:;vd i-Di- Line Draft YIN. The Au ill;, w5all bn prepared in ,accordance with Lhe provisicns 0 ScMuns 15001 and 1 .;J91 ui the UVQ)A Cuid­lli,c. -ind in the form., qpMfied in MOP 22 of Me ConnLy's havironmental ImpaCL Report Rl'::O 1111. ii)n for Cortificatiun of an EIR." -onplet. 5m 01 Al aq,mcy and public rat'. Low WiLhin the prescribed -ill c"aacpEn wil ! be tutpond,ii to 1,y All-: :i;!d sub�mitWJ L .- COUMV 1.01 rMOW. Qwn approval & Ac County, A/L nnAll Providn CounLy with a photo-r"ady cupy (J all. and for incorporat ioii Alto LL,.. l'in-il E.IF_ C10SU COUldiOMMM Ming the EIR renwNrch and preparation phase it; irquivuA by rho MUMV . ME shail he :k.,q,,,.-ired Lo sc':(-.du.le and provide rt.,p­1,..c::,.L,'.Li,1n M viCV to Lwelve biwcvhly meetings with County staff. J :-'t: putpusu of Arsp mvvtings will be to MpOrt Un An EIR' s preparation an: ' to di t !).s:; incl - asolvu any difficulLien and issues pertaining to the EIR. �AjLionally, M A/H Sililll 11u to I)I-Qvide representation 1w AN' s Uiruccor of Environvent.al Orvicus at up to four public hearings, . kr consultation macting with affucLod public agencies and one public of V:Lirk i,!E ilr,ll , within Navonty ( 10) calendar dayu ul the efrective date Ac NoLice A Prepatition or of the execution by County of the agreement for t "; s scope of woU (whichever occurs first ) , , }provide Cuunty with a co .,K ' P AM EIR foi screencheck pucpowu6 . To the exrerit: poE;,;ible, ( :It. :;ci ,.-rnchock Dratt FIR shall CunLain all exhibit:.,; , tablus and inforination Pu: L ! w, M LO the enviroamuntal dccnwmt.-,, ion for the project. AIE uhall , within an additicnql Wtvuh ( 15) tal,ndar dayy afLer .recuipt )f i:o."Ws conunwaLs and revisions LO Lhe screenchuck EIR, deliver to CuunL� U L9PY of the Draft EIR for review ana QTraval by the flanager, sl:all , within an additional fifteen (15) calendar d4ys after County' :: approval of the Drqfc EIR for reproduction, deliver the required number of conic, of the Draft EIIR apid t lip Draft cui r if ic at ioii resolution to the Man a 6e; , Fnvi I pni;,.L,.itzj I ysii; Division. ','f hjn Lwenty (20) calendar days after recei In by AjE of all cormnprits i cc elve A by Coprity on L I ic.- Prai t 1`1 it, io'll' shill deliver to the Mon qger, Friviypnmental Analysts PQW0P a COMPlUtCd PhUto-ready Lupy Of all comments and AM' s rLspopnen tyurplo. I ;plan hij work in accordance with the above time pai iods and i"CUrporatu SQ0 LimW pni-Ladn lIl thy' proggess wory scheduly reqnired by IOO!nF RniA AfIOCIATI Or1EfiTI. 600 Louth Commonwealth Avenue •fuite 1000•Lor Angeler•California •90005 .213/385-1000 DATE: September 6, 1984 TO: City of Huntington Beach Department of Development Services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FROM: Metropolitan Clearinghouse SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA -- EIR NO. 84-5 SCAG FILE NUMBER: OR-32368-NP v Thank you for submitting the Notice to Prepare the environmental document for the referenced project for SCAG review. SCAG staff does not have comments at this time but looks forward to reviewing the environmental document when available. Sincerely, W Y A M RPHY Clearirfohouse Official WAM:wp 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MCP 1 . P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME 5 W. Broadway, Suite 350 HUNTINGTON BEACH ng Beach, CA 90802-4467 �3) 590--5113 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 13, 1984 `�t P 1 P.O. Box 190 Mr. Howard Zelefsky Huntington Beach, CA 92648 City of Huntington Beach Department of Development Services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Zelefsky:. We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR and .the environmental checklist for the proposed Talbert Gap Project (SCH 84080808). This project proposes to increase the capacity of existing flood control channels, line these channels with concrete, and construct retention basins. There are sensi— tive fish and wildlife resources in the project area, and we recommend that the Draft EIR for this project include the following information: 1. Specific acreages and descriptions of the wetlands and other fish and wildlife habitats that may be affected by the proposed project. Portions of the project area appear to include wetlands that provide habitat for the endangered Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi), and the California least tern is known to feed in t e c annels proposed for renovation. 2. The fish and wildlife values, in terms of number of organisms and distri— bution, that currently exist in the unlined channels. The expected impacts on these resources should also be described. 3. Specific mitigation measures to offset the loss of wetlands and the habitats of endangered species and other fish and wildlife. Diversion of the natural flow or changes in the channel, bed, or banks of any river, stream, or lake will require notification to the Department of Fish and Game as called for in Section 1603 of .the Fish and Game Code. This notification (with fee) and the subsequent agreement must be completed prior to initiating any. such changes. We urge compliance with this code section .prior to completion of the specific design since project features associated with streams or stream— beds may 'require modifications. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Jack L. Spruill of our Brivironmental Services staff at (213) 590-5137• Sincerely, 1 Fred A. Worthley Jr. Regional Manager Region 5 . APPENDIX C RESPONSE LETTERS FROM SERVING AGENCIES The City has not received any response letters from any affected serving agencies. APPENDIX D BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT i b BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES-ASSESSMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: The Arroyo Group 40 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, California 91105 Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates, Inc. 3140 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 (714) 641-8042 Contact Person: Larry D. Munsey September 1984 3.4 Biological Resources • Environmental. Setting Introduction. The purpose of this section is to provide planners, decision-makers and the general public with an objective assessment of biological impacts associated with proposed improvements to the Talbert Gap Flood Control System. As indicated in the project description, the area encompassed by this project is largely urban residential and light commercial with open space areas adjacent to the coast and at Bartlett Park near Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue. The potential for these habitat areas to possess significant value and/or support sensitive plants or wildlife warrant this assessment and render its findings key to the environmental review process. Although this assessment is comprehensive, focus is placed upon those resources of importance and value. For purposes of the assessment, biological resources refer to vascular plants, aquatic invertebrates, and .aquatic and terrestrial vertebrate animals (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals). No attempt is made to address lower plants or insects and.other terrestrial invertebrates. The biotic composition of the project area is described herein from information compiled through field reconnaissance, supplemented by already existing documentation of biological resources within the project vicinity. Considered specifically in this assessment are proposed improvements to existing flood control channels and the contemplated construction of a retention basin at Bartlett Park. The project area was surveyed on foot and by car by Michael Brandman Associates on eight separate occasions in August 1984. The physical nature of the project area permitted a complete direct examination of virtually all terrain within its confines. Systematic inventory of terrestrial plants and vertebrates within the project. area was accomplished by walking several passes through each representative plant .community to assure thorough examination of all habitat types and distinctive physical . features. Floral and ' faunal constituents encountered were recorded in terms of relative abundance and host habitat types. The terrestrial biotic composition of the project area was derived from this information combined with documented habitat preferences of regional wildlife species which, whether or not detected during the survey, are known to include the project area within their range. Habitat types and sensitive resources were assessed in the field with the aid of 400-scale (1"=4001) black and white aerial photographs, 1,500-scale color aerial photographs and 750-scale topography maps. Aquatic invertebrates and fishes of the Talbert Gap Flood Control channels were sampled on August 23, 1984. Three different types of data were collected: data on. water quality during beach seining activities; contents of the beach seine catches and contents of the infaunal benthic core samples taken. Methods applied during collection and handling of these data were as described below. The Talbert Channel system was sampled for both benthic and free-swimming faunal components at four stations located between the coast and Adams Avenue. Specific sampling locations were as follows: Station 1 - 100 meters inland from the mouth of the channel; Station 2 - northwest of Brookhurst Street 2 near the confluence of the Talbert and Huntington Beach channels; Station 3 - in Talbert Channel on the south side of Atlanta Avenue; Station 4 - in the Talbert . Channel immediately south of Adams Avenue. Water temperature, acidity/alkalinity (pH), dissolved oxygen and conductivity were measured in the field with a Horiba V-7 Water Analyzer. Salinity was calculated in the laboratory from conductivity and temperature data. Measurements were made 2 to 3 inches under the water surface and approximately 1 meter from the side of the channel. Readings were taken just prior to beach seining from both incoming and outgoing tidal flows. Seine collections were made with a 6 x 50-foot. beach seine (1/8-inch mesh) stretched vertically and placed in the water. The net was walked into the current for a short distance to ensure proper deployment, then pursed and hauled in. No over-net escape was observed. Catches very low in content were inferred to be the result of inconsistent bottom contact. In such cases the catch was negated and the net reset. At Stations 1 and 2 the channel was too wide to allow for a complete cross-section to be sampled. Overlapping sets from the channel center to each side were employed at these two stations. Fishes and invertebrates captured at each station were identified, counted, weighed and measured to the nearest millimeter standard length. Three infaunal benthic core samples were taken at each station with a 1-liter, diver-operated box corer which takes a 10-centimeter cube of sediment from the channel bottom. Samples were taken .along a transect across the channel. The first sample from-each station (Sample A) was taken from the east side of the channel near the bank. Sample C was taken from the west side of the channel near the bank and Sample B was taken as near the channel center as flow would allow. Samples were washed in the field in ambient water on a 0.5-mm screen. Debris and organisms retained on the screen were fixed in 10 percent buffered formalin solution and returned to the laboratory for further processing. In the laboratory, samples were rinsed free of formalin (after a 24-hour fixation period) and transferred to 70 percent isopropyl alcohol. Collected organisms were identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level, usually species, and counted. Aggregate weight was determined to the nearest 0.01 gram for all species other than polychaete worms which were weighed together as a class. Habitat designations used . in this assessment are according to the basic classification system of Munz and Keck (1959), as amplified by Cheatham and Haller (1975) and Thorne (1976). Floral taxonomy follows the current regional flora of Munz (1974) with several widely accepted taxonomic revisions. Common plant names, where not available from Munz (1974), are taken from' Abrams (1923), Hitchcock (1950), Robbins, et al. (1951), Collins (1972) and Muns (1983). Vertebrates identified in the field by sight, calls, tracks,.scat, aquatic sampling or other signs are cited according to the nomenclature of Miller and Lea(1972), Moyle (1976) and Lee et al. (1980) for fishes, Stebbins (1972) and Collins, et al. (1978) for amphibians and reptiles; AOU (1983) for birds; and Hall (1981jand- Jones, et al. (1982) for mammals. Nomenclature for invertebrates encountered by aquatic sampling follows Hartman (1968, 1969) for annelid worms, Stebbing (1906), Schmitt (1921), Laubitz (1970), Miller (1975) and Chapman and Dorman (1975) for arthropods and Olroyd (1925) for mollusks, with recent widely accepted nomenclatural and taxonomic modifications. Authorities used for determination of sensitive biological resources are as follows: plants - FWS (1982), CDFG (1984), Smith, et al. (1980) and CNDDB (1984); wildlife - FWS (1982), CDFG (1980, 1983) 3 and CNDDB (1984). Additional studies on rare and endangered species in the project vicinity were consulted in the performance of this assessment and are . cited appropriately in the following sections. The analysis of impacts presented in this assessment reflects a "worst case" approach by addressing the maximum area which could be directly affected by implementation of the proposed project. Consequently, all biological impacts potentially associated with the project are fully disclosed. Based upon the significance and magnitude of potential impacts identified, mitigation measures are recommended which are .considered warranted and feasible within the context o'f theproject�..,j� . . .,, ,. �. , . Vegetation. The plant communities comprising the Talbert Gap Channel project area ;are categorized into fthree groups in -the following discussion: ' .those Z ; , associated with'the floodcontrol channels proper, those occurring in Bartlett Park and those occurring in the Buntington Beach Wetland which is adjacent to Reaches 1, 2 and 3 of the Talbert and Huntington Beach Channels. A complete inventory of the plant species occurring within each are listed in'Appendices A through .C. While most of the coastal wetland, strictly speaking, is not included within the 1 .project boundary, it is an 'integral part of the flood control system and therefore is addressed in this assessment. The Huntin ton Beach Wetland comprises fl1 acres of viable 'wetlands habitat (CDFG i'982), included within the larger 167=acre "Huntington Beach Wetland" which lies northeast of PCH between the Santa Ana River and Beach" Boulevard (see Figure 2, CDFG 19825 This coastal ;wetland consists almost entirely of salt marsh habitat with associated ruderal plants at its I Less than one acre of the Huntington.Beach Wetland is freshwater marsh habitat, which is maintained by effluent from an adjacent trailer park. The salt marsh embodies several distinct components-pickleweed marsh, salt flat, saltwater channel, saltwater pond a_ nd a_ disturbed ruderal component. - The Hu;ntingt_on Beach 'Wetland is divided into six units by roadways and* flood control levees ' For convenience of discussion, these units are 'numbered land described below WI Figur'e 2, CDFG 1982).. . � Unit 1 is a 16-acne area bounded by Brookhurst Street.on the northwest, Talbert Channel on the northeast and southeast, and Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) on the southwest.' Unit 2 is-the largest component at 63 5 acres, and it is bounded by Magnolia 'Street on the north_west, Huntington Beach and Talbert Channels on the northeast; Brookhurst Street on the southeast and PCH on the southwest. Unit 3 is•a 3'5 5-acre parcel bounded by the Southern California Edison (SCE) power plant on the northwest, Huntington Beach Channel on the northeast, Magnolia Street on the southeast and PCH on the southwest. 'The remaining three units are separated from the others by the SCE power plant and Huntington-by-the-Sea RV park. These units lie west of Newland Street and generally north and northwest of the RV park. Unit 4-is"a 16-acre parcel on the inland side of Huntington Beach Channel north "of Huntington-by-the�ea RV'park and west of Newland Street. The 31-acre Unit 5 is bounded on the west by Beach Boulevard, on the north by a shopping center, on the east by Huntington Beach Channel and Huntington-by-the Sea RV-park and on the southwest by PCH." West of Beach Boulevard is the 5=acre Unit 6 comprising the riorthwesternmost extension of the Huntington Beach Wetland. It is bounded on' the east by Beach Boulevard and on the west by the Driftwood Beach Club Mobile Home Park. 4 Although much of Unit 1 is seriously degraded, it may be the most ecologically diverse portion of the wetland complex. The dominant plant in this section, as elsewhere in the Huntington Beach Wetland, is common pickleweed (Salicornia virginica). Other common plants include five-hooked bassia (Bassia h sso ifolia , slender aster (Aster exilis), spear saltbush (Atriplex patula), saltgrass Distichlis s ip cata) and, to a lesser extent, alkali heath (Frankenia grandifolia). Much of the southeastern half of Unit 1 is disturbed upland, perhaps formerly part of the extensive dune system that separated the marsh from the coastal strand. A small dune fragment of less than one-half acre supports a few young black willows (Salix gooddingii). This area of higher elevation has been subjected to periodic off-roaau vehicle traffic and invaded by ruderal species such as ice plant (Carpobrotus spp., Gasoul spp.), western ragweed (Ambrosia silostach ia), garland chrysanthemum Chr santhemum coronarium), telegraph weed Heterotheca grandiflora) and alkali-mallow Sida leprosa . Ruderal species have also invaded portions of the pickleweed marsh. In the central portion of Unit 1 is a saltflat vegetated with California sea-blite (Suaeda californica). A meandering channel which is presently isolated from tidal waters of tie Santa Ana River and Talbert Channel traverses the section. Along one portion of the channel is a small stand of broad-leaved cat-tail (Typha latifolia). Northwest of Brookhurst Street is Unit 2, the largest undissected component of the Huntington Beach Wetland. Unbroken pickleweed marsh forms a dense cover over most of the southeastern half. The northern half, however, is crisscrossed with vehicle trails and the northwesternmost portion adjacent to Magnolia Street is used as.a seasonal parking lot. Some standing water is present in the northern portion, apparently an accumulation of rainwater, as there is no avenue for drainage or tidal flushing. Associated with the dominant pickleweed in this unit are patches of alkali heath and saltgrass. Coastal goldenbush (Haplopappus venetus) is the common component of higher ,ground bordering the marsh at Brookhurst near PCH. Spiny rush (Juncus acutus) is common in the lower, saturated soils. of the marsh. This section has not been as seriously impacted as Unit 1, other than by vehicular traffic in the saltflats northwest of the middle of the unit. Few ruderal species have penetrated the salt marsh in this unit. Unit 3 is relatively undisturbed in the southeastern half where pickleweed predominates. It is, however, heavily disturbed in the northwestern half. This portion is primarily unvegetated salt flats with vehicle trails throughout. A pond (effluent from the SCE plant and collected rainwater) is present in the northwestern corner. As indicated earlier, Units 4, 5 and 6 are separated from Units 1, 2 and 3 by approximately one kilometer and may be considered as a separate component. Unit 4 has been filled and scraped, but current litigation may result in restoration • of at least a portion of this section as a viable salt marsh. Vegetation of Unit 4 is predominantly common pickleweed, although of much sparser distribution than in other sections. The vegetational character of Unit 5 is similar to that of Units 2 and 3 with common pickleweed the clearly dominant species. As in the other sections, subdominants .include alkali-heath and saltgrass. A 0.2-acre freshwater marsh component is present where a drainage pipe carrying wastewater effluent from the Driftwood Beach Club Mobile Home Park west of Beach Boulevard daylights on the east side of Beach Boulevard. 5 • Unit 6 is a weed field with a freshwater marsh of about one acre in the central portion adjacent to the mobile home park just offsite. The predominant vegetation in the freshwater component of Units 5 and 6 is.cat-tail (Typha sp.), tule (Scir us californicus), olney bulrush (Scir us olneyi) and Pacific coast bulrush (Scirpus robustus . The remainder of Unit 6 is a weed field with.Italian ryegrass (Lolium erenne multiflorum), slender aster, prickly ox-tongue (Picris echioides) and common pickleweed predominant. The Huntington Beach Wetland is greatly reduced in size from its original extent (see CDFG 1982 for a detailed discussion), and what remains is highly degraded in nature. The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG 1982) has determined that, of 150 acres of historic wetland in the Huntington Beach Wetland study area; 115 acres (76.5 percent) remain as viable or readily restorable wetland. The entire system has been cut off from tidal flow and several characteristic salt marsh plants dependent upon daily tidal flushing may have disappeared from the Huntington Beach Wetland as a result. Characteristic salt marsh plants absent from, or scarce in; the Huntington Beach Wetland, based upon the present study and other recent botanical studies of the area (CDFG 1982, Hunt 1984) are cordgrass (Spartina foliosa), sea-lavender -(Limonium californicum), shoregrass (Monanthochloe littoralis), annual pickleweed Salicornia bigelovii , samphire (Salicornia subterminalis and saltwort (Batis maritima). Unsuitable soil, hydrologic or physiographic conditions may preclude the presence of some species (e.g., cordgrass). Other species rare or absent in the Huntington Beach Wetland are near the limit of their range in this area (e.g., saltwort). Still others are difficult to distinguish from similar common species (annual pickleweed) and may be overlooked. However, some, such as. samphire, occur on. alkaline flats in the upper tidal zone, much of which has been lost to development. in this region. Others are dependent upon periodic inundation with freshwater for germination and may have been adversely affected by the channelization of local freshwater drainages such as the Santa Ana River and the Talbert Valley Flood Control system. .The Talbert Valley Flood Control Channel system within the City of Huntington Beach comprises nine reaches draining three flood control channels. Most of Reach 8 and all of Reaches 10 and 11 are within the City of Fountain Valley and, as such, are outside the project boundary. Reach 1 extends from the ocean at the Santa Ana River mouth north and west to the confluence of the Talbert and .Huntington Beach Channels. Reach 2 continues as Huntington Beach Channel in a northwesterly direction, roughly paralleling the coastline, to Newland Street. Reach 3 turns north, away from the coast, and extends to Atlanta Avenue. Reach 4 continues north to the head of the Huntington Beach Channel at Adams Avenue just east of Beach Boulevard. Reaches 5 and 6 constitute the middle portion of Talbert Channel (south of Adams). Reaches 1 through 6 contain maritime or brackish waters and are tidal under normal conditions. The upper portion of Reach 6, and presumably Reach 4, are only slightly saline (Table 1) and should be considered transitional between brackish and freshwater. North of Adams Avenue, tidal flow and water salinity levels are negligible. These channel sections include the remainder of Talbert Channel (Reaches 7 and 8) and all of the Fountain Valley Channel (Reaches 9, 10 and 11), of which only Reaches 7, 9 and a short section of 8 are within the project boundary. 6 TABLE 1 WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS BY STATION AND • DIRECTION OF TIDAL FLOW Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Tide Flow: In Out In Out In Out In Out pH1 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 9.0 8.3 9.0 7.9 Temperature2 21.7 22.2 20.8 23.7 26.2 29.7 26.4 33.4 Dissolved Oxygen 10.7 10.2 11.1 9.7 12.0 * 5.1 Salinity4 33.06 33.23 33.99 32.50 23.20 19.75 4.78 3.63 * Instrument malfunction 1 in pH units 2 in *Centigrade 3 in parts per million 4 in parts per thousand . i Differences in tidal vs non-tidal portions of the channel system are reflected profoundly in the species of emergent and shoreline plants present. Tidal portions of the system are virtually devoid of vegetation in many sections with occasional patches of Pic kleweed along the lower banks and an occasional clump of Russian- thistle (Salsola iberica) or Australian saltbush (Atri lex semibaccata) on the upper banks of the flood control levees. Non-tidal components, north of Adams Avenue are heavily vegetated in some sections with tule, a typical freshwater marsh species. Channel banks here, as elsewhere, are generally devoid of vegetation, although some non-native grasses, such as dallis grass (Pal spalum dilatatum), have taken hold in response to irrigation from lawn sprinklers in adjacent re dential lots. Bartlett Park (north of Adams Avenue at Beach Boulevard) has been identified as the proposed location for establishment of a retention basin into which 'ekcess flood waters would be diverted during periods of capacity flow. The retention basin.would be seldom utilized, only during and immediately following periods of heavy rainfall. Bartlett Park is a 16.2-acre city-owned open space park consisting of a freshwater marsh and willow riparian community. It is bounded on the west by a steep bluff And on the east by a weed field and _Coldwater Lane. A natural freshwater drainage .traverses the site from north to south. It supports a stand of mature willows, including numerous black willows that have attained heights of 35 to 40 feet. Freshwater marsh vegetation on the site is predominantly tule, Olney bulrush and umbrella sedge (Cyperiis eragrostis), with small amounts of broad- leaved cat-tail, pale spike-rush Eleocharis macrostachya) and Torrey rush (Juncus torreyi). Common weed-field species adjacent to the riparian community are western ragweed, bermudagrass (CXnod�on da�ct lemon) and Italian ryegrass. Ruderal components adjacent to Coldwater ante include ice-plant, castor-bean (Ricinus communis), red brome (Bromus rubens) and bermudagrass. Wildlife. Wildlife systematically surveyed for this assessment were limited to vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates. All species detected are included in the species lists (Appendices A through C), as ate those recorded by other investigators (e.g., LCP 1980, CDFG 1982, Hunt 1984). Species not recorded but expected to occur on a regular basis, at least seasonally, are also included. As described in the previous section, the coastal wetland includes areas with hydric soils found northeast of PCH from the Santa Ana River to Beach Boulevard and east to the Talbert and Huntington Beach Channels. Salt marshes are among the most productive of ecosystems, and even relatively simple and degraded ones support a large wildlife complement. Aquatic invertebrates and fishes of the wetlands were not systematically censused for this. assessment although the mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and perhaps the killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis) are found in the SCE pond and channels within the salt marsh, as are the fiddler crab (Uca crenulata) and salt marsh snail ('Vielampus olivaceus). 7 Most species typical of Sampling Station 2 below the confluence of Talbert and Huntington Beach Channels (Tables 2 and 3) would also be found here if a tidal connection. were to be established. This was the case in 1979 when,as mitigation for a project of the Orange County Flood Control Agency, water was diverted from the Talbert Channel into the marsh via pipes through the dike. Within six months numerous fish species had colonized the marsh channels (see CDFG 1982) and marsh vegetation had begun to flourish. Although most amphibians are not adapted to a marine or estuarine existence, a few species may enter brackish portions of the salt marsh from nearby freshwater habitats. No amphibians were recorded during the present survey, although Pacific treefrogs (�H le�a re ilia) and western toads (Bufo boreas) may be present in the freshwater mars�we� Beach Boulevard, as may t-Fe non-native bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). The garden slender salamander (Batrachoseps major) is a widespread inhabitant of moist soils and, can thrive even around well-watered lawns and gardens. Historically, the species occupied riparian woodland along the Santa Ana River and has since spread into landscaped residential areas as suitable urban habitat has become established within what were historically alkali flats and salt marshes. Several species of lizards and snakes can be expected to occur in coastal wetlands within or near the project area above areas of tidal flux. The most likely would be expected to be the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana), gopher snake (Pituo hishis melanoleucus) and, perhaps, the common kingsnake Lampropeltis gettulus). Birds are abundant and conspicuous inhabitants of the coastal wetlands. Salt marshes, salt flats and estuaries boast more species and larger concentrations of birds per unit area than perhaps any other ecosystem . in temperate North America. Migrant and wintering waterfowl, waders, shorebirds, gulls and terns constitute the bulk of avian species that utilize estuarine habitats for foraging and resting; however, few species actually nest in local salt marshes. Most nesting birds in coastal salt marshes are the smaller, less-conspicuous landbirds. One such species, the Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi) is a common inhabitant of pickleweed salt marshes, including the Huntington Beach Wetland. This subspecies of savannah sparrow, however, has been reduced in numbers, as has its habitat, and is now considered an endangered species by the California Department of Fish and Game. Its status in the Huntington Beach Wetland is discussed more fully in the following section. Other birds that nest in the salt marsh are the song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) and western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta) in the upper portions, marsh wren (Cistothorus Dalustris) in the reeds and sedges, and killdeer (Charadrius vociferus) on the salt flats. In the small freshwater marsh in Units 5 and 6, breeding birds likely include red-winged blackbird (A eg laius phoeniceus), song sparrow and marsh wren. The federal and state endangered California least tern (Sterna antillarum browni) has been observed feeding on mosquitofish in the pond below the SCE power plant, usually when its chicks are young and. small fish may not be readily available elsewhere (Atwood and :Minsky 1983; C. Collins, personal communication). Presumably, with a tidal connection and a more diverse fish fauna, least terns would utilize the salt marsh channels and ponds to a greater degree than they do presently. 8 TABLE 2 • INFAUNAL COLLECTION Station/Sample Taxon 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Campanularidae, unid 1 PLATYHELMINTHES Platyhelminthes sp. C 1 NEMATODA Nematoda, unid.. 115 1 7 NEMER.TEA Nemertea, unid. 1 1 ANNELIDA Oligochaeta Oligo.chaeta, unid. it 11 14 2 Polychaeta Armandia bioculata 2 • Boccardia li erica 51 7 22 Capitella ca itata 3 1 1 Goniada littorea. 1 4 1 1 Leitoscoloplos elon atus 1 Mediomastus amb.isetus 3 7 10 11 41 Mediomastus calif orniensis 2 12 14 Microphthalmus sp. 2 Micros io maculata 5 7 2 araone p aty _rraanchia 139 Pholoides.aspera 1 ol�yd-ora ligni 2 Polydora socialis 15 Prionospio cirrif era 7 1 Prio�nos io heterobranchiata 1 seud ydora panci ranchiata 1 2 3 Scololepis sp. 1 3. 1 1 Streblospio benedicti 4 176 58 289 32 33 1 ARTHROPODA Isopoda Gnathia hirsuta 1 Jaeropsis dubia 1 Janiralata occidentalis 1 • TABLE 2 (continued) • Station/Sample Taxon 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C ARTHROPODA (continued) Amphipoda Gammaridea, unid. 1 Grandidierella japonica. 16 4 Mayerella banksla 1 Pardalisca marionis 1 Photis sp. 3 Decapoda Callianassa sp. 1 1 Caridea, unid. 1 Hemigrapsus oregonensis 1 MOLLUSCA Gastropoda Bulla gouldiana_ 1 Cylichnella harpa 4 Cylichnella inculta 3 Neverita recluziana 1 Pelecypoda i Chione calif orniensis 13 1 Cryptomya californica 1 Laevicardium substriatum 19 2 13 Protothaca staminea 1. 1 1 eooen rosaceus 1 2 1 Ta elus subteres 13 6 23 Tellina carpenter! 1 2 Theora lubrica 2 PHORONIDA Phoronida, unid. 1 • TABLE 3 • BEACH SEINE CATCH - NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS Station 1 Station "2 'Station 3 Station 4 Species Tide Flow: In- Out In Out In Out In Out CLAMS Argopecten aequisulcatus 1 bay scallop SHRIMPS Palaemon macrodactylus 1 1? 1 2 Japanese prawn CRABS Callinectes arcuatus* P swimming-crab Hemigrapsus oregonensis 1 6 1 yellow mud crab Pachygrapsus crassipes 1 lined shore crab FISHES Anchoa compressa 1 13 1 deepbody anchovy Atherinops affinis 29 179 3 14 . topsmelt Fundulus parvipinnis 49 15 California killifish Gillichthys mirabilis 1 longjaw mudsucker Hypsopsetta guttulata 3 diamond turbot Leptocottus armatus 1 9 5 1 staghorn sculpin Paralichthys californica 2 1 6 California halibut Tila is spp. 1 62 37 13 133 tilapia Included for information only. This specimen was taken in a seine pass which was rejected because of inconsistent bottom contact. The crab was identified and released in the field; no weight was obtained. The most conspicuous, and perhaps most abundant, mammal in the salt marsh is the Audubon cottontail (Sylvilagus auduboni). Other mammals presumed to be plentiful here are the California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) and several nocturnal rodents, such as western harvest mouse (Reithrodontom s megalotis), house mouse (Mus musculus), norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and southern pocket gopher (Tho mo_mys umbrinus). Predators such as Virginia oppossum (Didel his virginiana),, coyote Canis latrans), long-tailed weasel (Mustela frenata) and striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis are also likely to be present. Several other species may occur in limited numbers and these are included in the species list in Appendix A. Man and his pets are also signficant predators in wetland areas close to urban developments. Data gathered in the course of aquatic sampling (Table 1) in the flood control channels indicate salinity levels ranging from fully oceanic at Stations 1 and 2 to almost zero (freshwater) at Station 4. Station 3 values were intermediate, reflecting estuarine conditions. In the lower reaches of a flood control channel which empties into the ocean, salinity is usually the most variable water quality parameter. Although differences in salinity were observed at each station on incoming and outgoing tides, there was little tidal variation in salinity at each station compared with the marked differences between stations. Dissolved oxygen ranged from 5.1 to 12.0 ppm and was higher on the incoming tide. All measured values were above the level which is usually considered a critical lower limit for marine ogranisms. Water temperatures increased. upchannel and were higher later in the day at all four stations. Values ranged from 20.8°C at Station 2 on the incoming tide to 33.4°C at Station 4 on the outgoing tide. The differences between incoming and outgoing tidal temperatures was greatest at Station 4 and least at Station 1 (Table 1). Alkalinity at Stations 1 and 2 was slight but within the range (pH=7 to 8) considered normal for nearshore seawater. Rather than dropping back toward neutrality (pH=7.0), waters at Stations 3 and 4 showed greater alkalinity, although they were not fully saline at Station 3 and were almost fresh at Station 4. On the afternoon outgoing tide, values at Stations 3 and 4 were more normal, becoming less_ alkaline as they became less saline. The flood control channels are relatively sterile biologically. . The fishes and macroinvertebrates of the channels are neither diverse nor particularly abundant, with the dominance of introduced species in both categories suggesting a stressed environment above Station 3. The virtual absence of benthic infauna above Station 3 is undoubtedly the result of high sediment sulfide levels in the non-tidal portions of the channel. Forty-seven invertebrate taxa were .collected in 12 bottom core samples. Of these, 19 taxa (40 percent) were annelid worm species, 12 (26 percent) were mollusks, and 11 (23 percent) were arthropods. Single taxa in the phyla Cnidaria, Platyhelminthes, Nematoda, Nemertea and Phoronida were also collected (Table 3). These 8 phyla were represented by 1,291 individuals, of which almost 80 percent were annelids. The community formed by these infaunal invertebrates is very similar to that found in Upper Newport Bay (MBC and SCCWRP 1980; Seapy 1981) where a salinity gradient similar to that found in Talbert Channel exists. Comparatively few infaunal invertebrates were recorded at stations where the overlying waters were less' than fully saline (approximately 33 parts per 9 thousand). Fifty percent of the sampling effort was expended at the inland Stations 3 and 4 where the water is brackish, while only 5 percent of the infaunal • organisms collected came from these sites. The infaarial invertebrate community was both most numerous (971 individuals - 71 percent of collection total) and most diverse (14 species - 72 percent of species collected) at the coastal Station 2. Station 1 (coastal) while-supporting a less abundant and diverse community than Station 2, yielded 10 times"as many, species and 5 times as many- individuals as were collected at Stations 3 and 4. Only one species was found at all four stations, the polychaete worm Streblospio benedicti. Species characteristic of fully marine salinities were unable to penetrate as far upchannel as Station 3. The lack of replacement of these marine species by brackish water species at Station 3 and by freshwater species at Station 4 indicates that only species with extraordinarily broad salinity tolerances_ can survive at these locations. Biomass data (Table 4) reinforces the impression that Stations 3 and 4 support an impoverished biota. When replicate values for the three collected samples are averaged toL arrive at a most probable standing crop, estimates of less than one gram per m jare obtained for both Statior 3 and 4. Corresponding average values are 10 gm/m.� at Station 1 and 122 gm/m at Station 2. Eight fish species and four invertebrate species were collected in the beach seines (Table 3). One additional fish and one invertebrate were noted in the immediate vicinity of the sampling sites. Several opaleye (Girella nigricans) were observed sheltered between rocks on the sides of the channel at Station 1, but none were taken with the net. One specimen of swimming crab (Callinectes arcuatus) was • caught in a rejected seine pass at Station 2. This is a relatively uncommon species near the northern limit of its range. It is usually found in estuarine waters of reduced salinity and has been taken locally in Upper Newport Bay and in Anaheim Bay. One of the fishes collected., Tilapia spp., may represent up to three separate species of cichlids. These are freshwater tropical fish originally imported to the United States for the aquarium trade. Three species have now become established in various drainage systems in California through authorized introduction for weed control in irrigation channels (Moyle 1976). They have spread into estuarine areas and can even survive for some time in .fully marine waters when flushed out of their normal channel habitats during large winter storms. The specimens at hand are probably the Mozambique tilapia (Tilapia mossambica), but T. hornorum and T. zillii may also be present. The remaining seven fishes (Table 3) are more typical residents of coastal bay and estuarine areas, being resident in both Upper Newport Bay (Bane 1968) and Anaheim Bay (Klingbeil, et al. 1975). Except for the two flatfish, California halibut (Paralichthys californica) and diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta �uttulata), which move to nearshore waters as adults, the fishes collected are probably resident in the channel throughout their lifetime. Tilapia and topsmelt (Atherinops affinis) were the most abundant fish species, accounting for 42 and 39 percent of the total catch, respectively. Their occurrence_ was almost mutually exclusive, with topsmelt found in tidal salt waters at Stations 1 and 2, and tilapia found in brackish waters at'Stations 3 and 4 (Table 3). These species were also the main contributors of biomass (Table 5), 10 TABLE 4 BIOMASS OF INFAUNAL SAMPLES Station Polychaetes All Other Taxa Total Total Per m2 1A <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 < 1 1B <0.01 0.28 0.28 28 1C <0.01 0.01 0.01 1 2A . 0.28 0.63 0.91 91 2B 0.11 0.85 0.96 96 2C 0.26 1.54 ' 1.80 180 3A - - - - 3B 0.01 - 0.01 1 3C <0.01 - <0.01 <1 4A - - - - 4B <0.01 - <0.01 <1 4C - - - - • r • accounting for 80 percent (tilapia) and 15 percent (topsmelt) of the collection total. Few free swimming invertebrates were taken, the most abundant among them being the introduced Japanese prawn (Palaemon macrodactylus), which occurred at all stations except Station 1. Invertebrates also accounted for only 0.003 percent of the aggregate biomass (Table 5). Results obtained for aquatic invertebrates and fishes in the field sampling, as they reflected conditions on only one day, do not fully represent the range of variability present at the site. Tidal heights covered only a limited part of their potential range during sampling. Predictions for August 23 were for tidal heights between +2.9 to +4.5 feet above mean lower low water (MLLW) during the sampling period. This range of 1.6 feet is far less than that experienced by channel organisms on January 18 and 19, 1984 when a range of 8.6 feet between consecutive high and low tides occurred. On those dates, saline water probably penetrated much further upchannel at high tide. During the extreme low tide on those days, many parts of the channel were probably exposed to the sun as ocean waters receded. During rainy periods when the channel is performing its primary function of draining runoff from the floodplain, salinity throughout the tidal cycle probably reaches zero as far seaward as Station 3. Although extreme environmental conditions, which may be the critical factors limiting organism presence and distribution along the environmental gradient that Talbert Channel represents, were not observed during sampling, the results obtained by the sampling are nevertheless probably representative of average conditions. Both the beach seine catch and the infaunal benthic collections show evidence that Talbert Channel represents a highly stressful environment. The success of two introduced species, the Japanese prawn and tilapia, the most numerous invertebrate and vertebrate species respectively in the beach seines, demonstrates that this is a disturbed ecosystem (at least upchannel of Station 2). In a balanced, undisturbed system, native species would have been competitively equivalent or superior to the invading exotics and would have prevented their becoming dominant. The nature of the sediments in the channel was recorded at each sampling site. These data indicate that at Station 1 the sediments were predominantly sandy with interspersed rock riprap from the channel sides. At Station 2 the sediments were muddy with little sand and with a prominent but thin layer of hydrogen sulfide-stained mud near the bottom of the cores. At Stations 3 and 4, sediments consisted solely of fine silt with high hydrogen sulfide concentrations throughout the cores. These differences both reflect the conditions of the overlying waters and explain the sharp differences in infaunal density and diversity between stations. The sandiness of Station. 1 sediments is indicative of higher current velocities than upchannel stations. The fine silt particles which normally would nourish a rich, • mixed filter- and deposit-feeding infaunal community (as at Station 2) are removed by the flow velocity prevailing near the mouth of the channel. Loss-of this finer sediment fraction restricts the variety and number of organisms occurring at the site. 11 TABLE 5 BEACH SEINE CATCH - BIOMASS (GM) Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Species Tide Flow: In Out In Out In Out In Out CLAMS Argopecten aeguisulcatus 5 bay scallop SHRIMPS Palaemon macrodactylus 2 4 <1 <1 Japanese prawn CRABS Callinectes arcuatus* swimming crab Hemigrapsus oregonensis 2 6 2 yellow mud crab Pachy apsus crassipes 5 lined shore crab FISHES Anchoa compressa 5 36 4 deepbody anchovy Atherinops affinis 540 247 560 57 topsmelt Fundulus parvipinnis 29 12 California killifish Gillichthys mirabilis 34 longjaw mudsucker Hypsopsetta guttulata 156 iamonTtur o Leptocottus armatus 6 106 62 16 staghorn sculpin Paralichthys californica 6 4 16 California halibut Tila is spp. 130 2350 2750 60 2450 * Included for information only. This specimen was taken in a seine pass which was rejected because of inconsistent bottom contact. The crab was identified and released in the field; no weight was obtained. The paucity of organisms occurring at Stations '3 and 4 probably reflects wide variations in salinity of the overlying water at these sites. In the virtual absence of macroinfauria, the abundant organic nutrients associated with the fine silty sediments at these site§ accumulate on the bottom. Without a macroinfauna to bioturbate the bottom and form burrows and crawl tracts allowing penetration of oxygenated water into the sediments; the accumulated organics undergo bacterial decay and produce a hydrogen sulfide-saturated bottom which discourages settlement of larvae. No amphibians or reptiles are likely to occur along tidal portions of the channel system other than, perhaps, a few side-blotched lizards: Numerous species of shorebirds and gulls feed along the channel bottom at low- tide along with a few waders. South and east of the confluence of the Huntington Beach and Talbert Channels a few waterfowl species can be found in the channel, especially in winter. Least terns, have been observed feeding in the channel (Atwood and Minsky 1983) although their main feeding areas are located offshore and at the mouth of the Santa Ana River. Several opportunistic omnivores such as the American crow can be found foraging along the edges of the channels or resting on the levees with the gulls and shorebirds. No mammals were observed along tidal portions of the channel system during the present study, although a few California ground squirrels may occur: Ground squirrels occur only sparsely on hydric soils .such as those in and bordering salt marshes and dredge-spoils used in constructing the channel levees: Non-tidal brackish and freshwater portions of the channels north of Adams Avenue exhibit a much richer vertebrate fauna. Amphibians expected to occur here are the Pacific tree frog and western toad. Garden slender salamanders, however, may be excluded, as there are no moist, protected areas that are free from periodical inundation. Salamanders undoubtedly occur' in residential yards adjacent to the flood control levees. Reptiles along the channels likely include the western fence lizard and a few side- blotched lizards, but little else. Potential snake species would be the gopher snake and, perhaps, western aquatic gartersnake (Thamnophis couchi). The latter species, while semi-aquatic, is generally not found in stagnant or polluted waters. During the dry season when the channels have not been flushed by recent storm flows, the system becomes stagnant and may concentrate industrial and residential pollutants .such as fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides and various chemical pollutants from light industrial activity in Huntington _ Beach and Fountain Valley. Birds expected here include many of those found in the freshwater marsh adjacent to Beach Boulevard at PCH. Four species of herons (see Appendix B) were observed in portions of the channel containing tules, as were a few red-winged blackbirds, black phoebes (Sa ornis nigricans) and American crows- (Corvus brachyrhynchos). The flood control channel habitats are not suitable for most mammal species. Along the exposed levee banks there are few plants to provide food and shelter for • rodents. Without rodents as prey items, few predators are likely to be present. There are no natural corridors linking the channels with natural areas offsite, thus no access is available for larger mammals such as coyote and deer (Odocoileus hemionus) that might otherwise occur on the fringes of the neighboring urban communities. Several house cats were observed on the levees and dogs are numerous in the area, but no other mammals were detected by the survey. Bartlett Park is biologically diverse and has been relatively little impacted by surrounding developments. The combined presence of riparian woodland, freshwater marsh and weed-field contribute significantly to the site's ecological diversity. The only factors limiting its species richness are small size, isolation from similar undeveloped ecosystems and the fact that it is fenced. Its small size and isolation will, over time, result in a relatively depauperate flora and fauna compared with similar-sized sites within larger contiguous riparian communities (MacArthur and Wilson 1967, Wilson and Willis 1975). The fence around the property adds to the site's isolation (the "habitat island" effect) by impeding or preventing the dispersal of many terrestrial organisms. On the other hand, fencing discourages potentially disruptive species such as dogs, cats, horses and people. In such an urban environment the positive- effects of fencing may outweigh the negative effects. Amphibians and reptiles on the site include such common species as western toad, Pacific treefrog, garden slender salamander, western fence lizard, side-blotched lizard, southern alligator lizard (Gerrhonotus multicarinatus), gopher snake, racer (Coluber constrictor) and, perhaps, western rattlesnake Crotalus viridis). Other species that also may be present in this community are listed in Appendix C. This mixed woodland, marsh and weed field community has attracted a rich avifaunal component. While there is no open water to support waterfowl or shorebirds, landbirds are abundant. Common species that breed onsite are red- shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), American kestrel (Falco s arverius), mourning and spotted doves Zenaida macroura and Streptopelia chinensis , northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), western flycatcher (Empidonax difficilis), Bewick's and house wrens (Thr othorus bewickii and Troglodytes aedon), bushtit .(Psaltri arus minimus , northern mockingbird (Mimus of lottos), European starling Sturnus vu aris , orange-crowned warbler ermivora ce ata), black-headed grosbeak (Pheucticus melanoce halus), brown and rufous-sided towhees (Pi ilo fuscus and P. erythrophthalmus), song sparrow, red-winged blackbird, northern oriole Icterus albula) and lesser and American goldfinches (Carduelis psaltria. and C. tristis). Mammals onsite would be expected to include several species of rodents, especially the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), California vole (Microtus californicus), house mouse, southern pocket gopher and California ground squirrel. The Audubon cottontail is common, and the Virginia oppossum, raccoon (Procyon lotor), striped skunk and long-tailed weasel are also expected. Sensitive Resources. An environmentally sensitive habitat is defined by the California Coastal Act as an area in which plant or animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable.because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments (Section 30107 of the California Coastal Act of 1976). Within the project area there are three environmentally sensitive habitat types: salt marsh, freshwater marsh and riparian woodland. Wetlands are becoming increasingly significant in California as they continue to be lost to urban development. They play an important role in providing food and shelter for water-related wildlife, including waterfowl, and are of special concern to various public agencies charged with managing and protecting game_and non- game resources. Approximately 115 acres of the 167-acre Huntington Beach Wetland adjacent to the area defined by the project constitute functional wetlands (see CDFG 1982), and much of the remaining 52 acres is considered restorable (CDFG 1982). The freshwater marshes at Beach Boulevard and PCH, and at Bartlett Park, are also considered wetlands, as is the riparian woodland at Bartlett Park. As such they potentially fall under the reviewing and regulatory authority of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Section 404).the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of. Fish and Game (California Fish and Game Code, Section 1601). The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, the California Species Preservation Act of 1970 and the California Native Plant Protection Act of 1982 set forth regulations and policies encouraging federal and state agencies to implement actions directed toward protecting and restoring species of plants and wildlife threatened with extinction. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game are authorized by this legislation to establish criteria for determining such species, to inventory and compile lists of these species, and to maintain current information on their status. Actions which may adversely affect listed species are subject to review by.the listing agency, which may issue recommendations for preserving the welfare of the affected species. The state endangered Belding's savannah sparrow breeds in the Huntington Beach . Wetland adjacent to the project, and the endangered least tern breeds on Huntington State .Beach north of the Santa Ana River mouth. - Least terns sometimes forage within the Talbert Gap Flood Control System and adjacent marshland, but their nesting colony is outside the project area. In recent years, least.terns from this and other colonies have begun to spend most of their foraging time offshore, with relatively little time spent in estuaries and stream channels (Atwood and Minsky 1983; C. Collins, personal communication). Apparently, the serious degradation of many of California's estuaries and the consequent reduction of their fish stocks has forced the terns to seek more of their food elsewhere. While least terns from the Huntington Beach colony utilize the mosquitofish-stocked SCE pond north of Magnolia Street and the Talbert, Greenville-Banning and Santa Ana River Channels to some extent for feeding, 75 percent or more of their effort is expended offshore (Atwood and Minsky 1983). Wilbur (1974) and Massey (1977a) have speculated that tidal estuaries formerly represented the principal foraging areas for least terns. While most least tern recovery efforts have been focused upon the breeding colonies themselves, loss of estuarine habitat may have played an equally important role in the species' decline (Atwood and Minsky 1983). Current efforts to improve and restore estuarine ecosystems in California may prove to be a significant- factor in boosting least tern populations in the future. The state-endangered Belding's savannah sparrow breeds in the pickleweed marshes between the Santa Ana River and Ocean Boulevard. It has been designated as endangered at the state level as a result of its decreasing population • and its dependence upon a diminishing resource, pickleweed salt marsh, for breeding. 14 A census of breeding pairs in the Huntington Beach Wetlands in 1977 (Massey, 1977b) revealed 34 territorial pairs between Beach Boulevard and Brookhurst .Street. None was recorded by Massey south of Brookhurst, however. Another census of the site in 1983 by Wilcox (Hunt 1984) revealed 90 to 92 pairs breeding between Beach Boulevard and Brookhurst Street. Wilcox also found no breeding .savannah sparrows south of Brookhurst. During the current assessment, approximately twenty individuals, mostly immatures, were counted in the marsh south of Brookhurst Street, but these may have dispersed into the area from ,breeding populations north of Brookhurst after fledging. This apparently substantial increase in numbers of breeding pairs estimated from the Huntington Beach Wetland between 1977 and 1983 is surprising. While the increase may be real and significant, the fact that the data have been reported by different investigators, perhaps using different censusing techniques and different durations of field effort, could exert a profound effect upon the census results. Even if the increase is real, no census data for intervening years are available for comparison -or for determination of short-term population trends. Other populations of the Belding's savannah sparrow occur locally in Upper Newport Bay, in the Bolsa Chica marshes and in Anaheim Bay. Another federal and state listed endangered species, the California brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis californicus) is frequently. observed along southern California beaches including Huntington State Beach. Most of these birds are post-breeding dispersers from colonies located farther south in Mexico, as only a small fraction of individuals on the west coast breed as far north as California. Brown pelicans are restricted to nearshore waters, only occasionally venturing into estuaries and marshes. The nearest breeding colonies to Huntington Beach are on Anacapa and Santa Barbara islands to the north and west, and Los Coronados Islands to the south in Mexico. The light-footed clapper rail (Rallus longirostris levipes), another federal and state endangered species, breeds locally in the cordgrass salt marshes in nearby -Upper Newport Bay to the south and Anaheim Bay to the north. It. was formerly more widespread along the coast, breeding wherever cordgrass was plentiful. In its present state, the Huntington Beach Wetland is both too small in size and too degraded. to support cordgrass. Cordgrass requires well-drained, deep-channel marshes with extensive areas of level terrain below the mean high tide line in order to flourish. It is unlikely that such conditions have occurred in this wetland in recent history nor that such a condition could be created during a salt marsh restoration program within the confines of the present Huntington Beach Wetland. No other rare or endangered wildlife reside in the Huntington Beach Wetland or utilize the wetland to a significant extent. Historically, the endangered bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucoce halus) and peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) bred along the southern Cali ornia coast and offshore islands and undoubtedly utilized the estuarine marshland at the mouth of the Santa Ana.River, but they have not bred locally in more .than twenty years. Efforts are now underway to restore breeding populations of both species in southern California. Successful attempts have been made recently with the bald eagle on Santa Catalina Island and with the peregrine falcon in Los Angeles. Only one sensitive coastal wetland plant species, the salt marsh bird's beak (Cordylanthus maritimus), has been found in the vicinity of Huntington Beach. It 15 is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game and the California Native Plant Society. This species is found in nearby Upper Newport Bay; but has not been recorded from the Huntington Beach Wetland, nor from the Bolsa Chica marsh. It was once a common plant of the uper salt marsh zone (Purer, 1942), but its range has been greatly reduced: Currently 'populations are known from Tijuana Estuary; Upper Newport Bay and Mugu Lagoon (Zedler, 1982). This facultative parasite apparently requires inundation with cool freshwater following heavy rains in order to germinate: Stream channelization for flood control has diverted storm waters away from salt marshes that were once subject to periodic freshwater flooding: Other local rare and endangered plants are found on coastal bluffs in the region but these are outside the area of concern addressed in this report. 16 Environmental Impacts . Impacts will be of three types, those resulting from general construction activities within the channels, those resulting from project design alternatives (drainage improvements) and those resulting from construction of a retention basin. Construction Activity Construction activity within the channels will disturb all wildlife in the vicinity and many can be expected to move to adjacent areas of similar habitat provided it is available at the onset of activity. Emigrating wildlife will be particularly vulnerable to mortality by predation and unsuccessful competition for food and territory. Species of low mobility and those refusing to emigrate will be eliminated outright by construction activities. This is particularly true of burrowing mammals and most amphibians and reptiles. Following construction, some species will return to the site if suitable habitat remained, although some will be dislodged permanently by long-term or permanent removal of habitat suited to their existence (e.g., freshwater marsh, mudflat). Construction activity within the channels could cause increased turbidity and sedimentation in the channel system downstream. Turbidity reduces the depth to which sunlight can penetrate water. Resultant decreased insolation reduces the number of aquatic microorganisms that can live and reproduce in these waters, especially plants that require sunlight for photosynthesis. Die-off of microorganisms, in turn, can cause elevated nutrient levels and result in algal "blooms" and bacterial growth that deplete water oxygen supplies needed by fish and other aquatic organisms. Thus even short-term changes in amounts of suspended particle matter in aquatic systems can exert long-term effects upon resident biota. Widening of the channels will remove some sediments, resuspend some and increase the turbidity and oxygen demand of downstream waters. The removal of sediments and 100 percent mortality of the organisms they contain will be an unavoidable aspect of the project. The degree of transport of suspended sediment and the degree of oxygen depletion will be contingent upon the method used to perform the sediment removal and channel widening and the source of the resuspended sediments. Sediments resuspended by channel widening near Stations 3 and 4, for instance, will place substantially higher demands upon available oxygen than those resuspended near Station 2 because upchannel sediments are currently anoxic. Increased sedimentation, at its extreme, could cause channel blockages and consequent disruption of tidal flows in the lower reaches of the system. In the extreme, sediments collecting at the channel mouth could sever the channel connection with the ocean during periods of low water flow, as has occurred in the Greenville-Banning Channel on the south side of the Santa Ana River. Potential damage to fish resources will be relatively slight. The vast majority of the fish standing crop is represented by what. is currently considered a nuisance fish (Tile is spp.), against which active sanctions have been sought (Moyle 1976). Downstream fishes (particularly topsmelt), being active swimmers, will probably leave the channel on the high tide once they begin to detect unacceptable increases in turbidity or declining oxygen levels in the water. The remaining fishes, which orient strongly to the bottom, will probably also leave the channel, but with less dispatch. They may be at risk of asphyxiation from a sharp increase 17 in hydrogen sulfide contaminated water. Based upon field collections, density of these species is low in the channel and losses are thus likely to be small. If it is assumed that loss of tilapia is beneficial, that the topsmelf will escape and that . the remaining fist)es will :suffer 100 percent mortality (worst case),.the estimated loss of beneficial fish species would'be estimated at "59 kg between'Station 1 and the junction of Reaches 7 and 9 of Talbert Channel Qther assumptions inherent in this estimate are (1) earn beach seine catch represents all fishes from a cross- section of the channel for a distance of 7.5 m (average distance walked prior to net closure); (2) statio_ n biorhass values represent the area from half way to the dowiichannel station to half way to the upchannel station. Free-swimming invertebrate losses would be considered negligible. ,. Disturbance of wildlife within the salt marsh adjacent to the lower reaches of the Huntington'Beach slid Talbert Channels will result from construction activities along the levees and in the channel within these reaches' This disturbance is expected to be minimal and only temporary, however.. Construction activity within the channels will be partially blocked from view and much of the construction generated noise will be muffled by the levee that separates the channel from the marsh Most smaller wildlife are not seriously disrupted by noise and quickly adapt to ongoing activity in their vicinity. f Larger wildlife, such as herons, large shorebirds,gulls and terns, are more susceptible to disturbances, but even they adapt to these types of etivities relatively quickly. - Drainage Improvements. A variety of drainage improvement alternatives. are contemplated' that -provide for increased flgw capacity within the flood control channels.' Under: consideration are alternatives that wquld require (1) lining the existing trapezoidal levees with concrete; (2) constructing concrete-lined vertical walls in place of existing levees; and (3) lining channel bottoms in combination with either of the above alternatives_ to stabilize banks and facilitate hydraulic action within the system. With respect to these channel improvements designed to accommodate storm flows, a drainage system with fined channel bottoms would exert a greater impact upon the local biota than would channels with natural bottoms In the tidal zone gulls and shorebirds feed along sandflats and mudflats exposed at low tide in the. channels; .In the non .tidal portion freshwater marsh vegetation, especially toles, grows readily in the mud along the floor of the channel.. Concrete-lined channel bottoms wotuld disrupt these habitats and their associated wildlife.. If properly installed, however, the impact upon these aquatic habitats might be only temporary (see. below). Should the channel bottom be_ lined throughout, the loss of infaunal benthos can be estimated from the, biomass data in Table 4 with the following generalizing assumptions. (1) the_channel is a straight trough with an average submerged width of 60 feet; (2), the average. biomass of,'the three samples collected at each site is representative of that site and of areas half way, `to the nearest stations; (3). mortality wiA be 100'percent, and (4) biomass values of less than 0,.01 gm -. 0,0.05 gm. Calculations based upon these. assumptions yield an estimated infaunal biomass loss of 3.,500, kg from the area of Talbert Channel between Station 1 and the junction of;R.eaches_7 and 9. How_ ever, it is emphasized that this. loss Wc.tpld. be temporary, not permanent. Lining the sides, of the. channels would. not affect the habitat addressed by this. • discussion which; is exclusively subtidal. Lining the channel bottom with, concrete 18 would extend the time required for recovery of the infauna but not render infaunal losses permanent. Sediment carried downstream with runoff waters will gradually reform the silty sediments characteristic of Stations 2, 3 and 4. Sandy sediments . at Station 1 will reform much sooner by transport of sand into the channel from Huntington State Beach. The length of time necessary for the bottom silts to be reconstituted is not predictable as it is totally dependent upon (1) the channel cross-sectional configuration 'adopted, (2) the effectiveness of the upstream catchment basins, and (3) the intensity of future winter storms. Once appropriate sediments have accumulated on the concrete channel bottom, resettlement of benthic infauna should commence immediately from ample supplies of planktonic larvae present in ocean waters off the channel opening. Most probable sources of these new recruits are the adjacent lower Santa Ana River, Newport Bay to the south and Sunset/Anaheim Bays to the north. Studies of sediments washed virtually bare of infauna by heavy winter storm flows in Upper Newport Bay (MBC and SCCWRP 1980) showed reestablishment of a community similar to that removed within one year. Reattainment of precisely the same community structure is unlikely because post-project physical conditions which determine structure will differ. It is expected that community function will be restored, however, and an equally acceptable . (although not identical) community established. Fish species will reinvade the channel once their invertebrate prey species become reestablished. It is likely that a similar group of fish species will occupy the post-project channel, although not until sediments are accumulated by deposition over the concrete floor. Wildlife do not use the existing embankments of the channel system to any significant degree, nor do the banks have any significant vegetational component. Small .amounts of pickleweed are found along the lower banks in portions of the tidal zone; however, most of this pickleweed is either in poor health or dead. Wildlife do not appear to be taking advantage. of the narrow pickleweed zone, perhaps because of its sparse growth which is limited to a thin strip along the water's. edge. Vertical concrete walls constructed to replace existing modified dirt banks would thus not be expected to pose any permanent adverse impacts upon. the biota of the channel system. In fact, the net.result might be positive. Vertical walls placed at the head, or top, of the embankments would significantly increase the amount of surface area along the bottom available for emergent aquatic plant growth (non-tidal portion) or mudflats (tidal portion). Concrete-lined trapezoidal channel banks should have neither beneficial nor significant adverse impacts upon the biota that utilize the channel system as the existing slopes are not presently utilized to any significant degree. Although it has been suggested by some that Talbert Channel may represent an area of high habitat value to migratory and resident birds, direct inspection suggests otherwise. Massey (1980) in an*evaluation of the avian resources.of both the lower Santa Ana River and Talbert Channel notes (page 3), "The Talbert Channel....has not been a habitat of much value to birds. There is some shorebird feeding on the exposed mudflats during low tides, and California least terns have fished in the channel during the nesting season. Its greatest value was (and will be) as a source of tidewater for the 17-acre marsh." Retention Basin. Bartlett Park, the proposed retention basin site, is a city-owned • open space recreational park occupied by a willow and freshwater marsh riparian 19 community. Converting it to a retention basin would necessitate installing a small pumping station at the south end and constructing a berm around the perimeter of the site: Periodic flooding of this site would not be expected to result in any significant adverse effects upon the present riparian community and would encourage growth of riparian vegetation in what is presently a weed_field. The acreage converted to a pump station and berms would be small and restricted to the roadside ruderal and weed=field communities: In exchange; existing weed- fields would likely be converted to riparian wetland within a relatively short period of time. In its extreme; if the site were frequently and heavily flooded for long periods; a small seasonal or permanent pond might form, drowning some of the existing willows: , By, the time this occurred; however; these willows would have been replaced with new willow growth around the perimeter of the pond: In summary, impacts associated with conversion of Bartlett Park to a.retention basin would be expected to result in a net positive or neutral effect upon biological resources. The net hydraulic result of the project will be an increased capacity of.the flood control channels for delivering stormflow waters to the ocean: Thus, during and following storms; salinity levels in normally saline or hypersaline waters downstream will be greatly reduced by the influx of. freshwater. If tidal connections were restored between the channels and marshland adjacent to Reaches 1 and 2 (see Mitigation Measures), flooding of these marshes could have a profound positive impact upon marshland vegetation: The addition of tidal action in the marsh would have the effect of rapidly' restoring marshland vegetation and aquatic organisms to the system--(CDFG 1982, page 19), Freshwaters inundation on an occasional basis would further enhance conditions in which many specie"; of marsh plants thrive and regenerate. Some flooding of salt and brackish water marshes with freshwater is both natural and essential for their maintenance as a healthy ecosystem: Before most of the coastal drainages in southern California were ehannelized; rainwater.runoff would collect in tidal estuaries supplying them with periodic fresh water: Today these freshwater supplies are routinely diverted away from estuarine ecosystems directly into the ocean. Many salt marsh plants, including cordgrass, require a sudden drop in salinity in order to germinate; thus, what may appear to be a healthy marsh may, in fact; not be if freshwater is not allowed to enter the system occasionally: However; excess freshwater admitted into the system could have an opposite effect upon the ecosystem by lowering salinity levels for extended periods. 20 Mitigation Measures Potentially significant adverse impacts posed by project implementation can be effectively mitigated by appropriate project design and responsible supervision. Measures adequate to mitigate these potential impacts are presented below. o During the construction of flood control channel improvements, measures could be employed which would minimize the transport of sediments downstream during construction. If movement of resuspended materials and resuspension-affected water were restricted by either partial or complete temporary downstream damming of the channel, impacts could be substantially reduced or eliminated. There would, however, seem to be little reason for carefully protecting from damage by downstream sediment transfer or oxygen depletion a. resource which subsequently would be physically removed. As removal of infauna is an unavoidable consequence of channel widening, it is suggested that no effort be expended to protect downstream channel infauna from damage during channel widening, particularly as measures are available for encouraging relatively rapid recovery of this resource (see below). o 'No significant adverse impacts would be expected to result from construction of concrete vertical embankments in the channels, nor from lining the present sloped embankments. Therefore, related mitigation measures are not considered necessary. o Lining channel bottoms poses the potential for significant adverse impacts. Foraging habitats for both shorebirds and freshwater marshbirds and habitats for infaunal benthic organisms would be at least temporarily eliminated by such action. However, if the new channel bottom were appropriately .designed, natural sedimentation processes would likely result in relatively rapid covering of the concrete bottom with mud to a depth sufficient to allow for regrowth of freshwater marsh vegetation in the non-tidal channel and reestablishment of saltwater mudflats in the tidal portions; in which case the channel bottom improvements would be self-mitigating. To assure that accumulated sediments would adequately cover the concrete bottom, the channel should first be excavated to a depth at least three feet below design grade to allow for resedimentation back to existing levels. If the concrete bottom were constructed too high in the tidal zone, subsequent sedimentation might result in eventual elevation of the effective channel bottom to a level at or above normal high tide levels. This might cause the channel to be cut-off from tidal waters altogether. If, on the other hand, concrete bottoms in the tidal portions of the channel were constructed too low in, or below, the tidal zone, sediments might never build up to levels sufficient to.allow for portions of the bottom to be exposed at low tide. o Recommended for consideration as a readily available mitigation measure to offset temporary disturbances to saltmarsh wildlife from channel construction activities is the installation of selective water control structures in the flood control levees adjacent to the Huntington 21 Beach Wetland. This would allow for both tidal waters and stormflow waters to enter the marsh area and significantly contribute to restoration of the presently degraded wetland habitat present. here. This would also serve as mitigation for temporary construction-related local. disruptions of least tern foraging activity within the channel by increasing their available foraging opportunities to include portions of the marsh that are presently unsuitable for this purpose. Some flooding of salt and brackish water marshes with freshwater is both natural and . essential for the maintenance of a healthy estuarine ecosystem (see previous section). Because storm.drains and channels collect water over a large expanse of land and concentrate it in one or few channels, care must be taken not to allow excessive amounts of rainwater to flow into the marsh, while at the same time ensuring that adequate amounts do reach it. To this end, installation of pipes or culverts with control structures such as flap gates, slide gates or flashboard risers would be necessary to assure that the amounts of stormflow waters entering the marsh could be regulated. o No mitigation measures are considered necessary for conversion of _Bartlett.Park into a.retention basin site. If design and mitigation measures discussed above are incorporated into the project, it can be implemented without exerting any significant adverse impacts upon biological resources. 22 REFERENCES CITED Abrams, Leroy. 1923. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States. Stanford University • Press, Stanford, California. 4 Volumes. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. The Check-List of North American Birds. 6th ed. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp. Atwood, J. L. 1980. . 111980 Least Tern Census Totals, Los Angeles and Orange Counties." Unpubl. ms. Atwood; J. L. and D. E. Minsky. 1983. "Least Tern Foragin Ecology at Three Major California Breeding Colonies." Western Birds 14(2f 57-72. Bane, G. W. 1968. Fishes of the Upper Newport Bay. Museum of Systematic Biology, Univ. of California, Irvine, California. Res. Ser. 3. 114 pp. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1980. At the Crossroads: A Report on the Status of California's Endangered and Rare Fish and Wildlife. State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento, California. 147 pp. + Addenda. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1982, Department of Fish and Game Determination of the Status of the Huntington Beach Wetlands. Photocopied ms. 35 pp. .California-Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1983. "List of Endangered, Rare and Threatened. Animals of California." Revised June 1, 1983. State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento, California. Photocopied list. 4 pp. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 1984. "Designated Endangered or Rare Plants." Summary list from Section 1904 Fish and Game Code (Native Plant Protection Act). Revised July 1, 1984. State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento, California. Photocopied list. 5 pp. California. Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). 1984. Data Base Record Search for Information on Threatened, Endangered, Rare or Otherwise Sensitive Species and Communities in the Vicinity of Huntington Beach, Orange County, California. California Department of Fish and Game, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento, California. Chapman, J. .W., and J. A. Dorman. 1975. "Diagnosis, Systematics and Notes on Grandidierella japponica (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) and Its Introduction to the Pacific Coast of the United States." Bull. So. Cal. Acad. Sci., Volume 74(3):104-108. Cheatham, N. H. and J. R. Haller. 1975. "An Annotated List of California Habitat Types." Unpublished. Collins, B. J. 1972. Key to Coastal and Chaparral Flowering Plants of Southern California. California State University, Northridge, California. 249 pp. • Collins, C. T., K. E. Bender and D. D. Rypka. 1979. "Report on the Feeding and Nesting Habits of the California Least Tern in the Santa Ana River ;Marsh Area, Orange County, California." Final Report, Contract No, DACW09-78- 008, U.S. Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles, California. 30 pp. Collins. J. T., J. E. .Hukeey, J. L. Knight and H. M. Smith. 1978. "Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians and Reptiles." Soc. Study Amphibians and Reptiles. Hero. ,Circ. 7. Fish. and Wildlife Service (FENS). 1982. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Federal Register` 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. U.S. Department of the Interior", Reprint. 13 pp. Hall, E. R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York. 2 Volumes. Hartman, b. 1968. Atlas of Ereantiate Polychaetous Annelids from California. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California_ Press, Los Angeles, California. 828 pp. Hartman, O. 1969. Atlas of Sedentariate Polychaetous _Annelids from California. Allan Hancock Foundation, University of. Southern California Press, Los Angeles, California. 812 pp. Hitchcock, A. S. 1950. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication No, 200i, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1051 pp. Hunt, Harold. 1984. "Biological Report for the Orange 1 Widening Project." Water, Research and Testing Unit, Transportation Laboratory. Unpubl. ms. 108 pp. + Appendices. Jones, J. K., Jr., D. C. Carter, H. H. Genoways, R. S. Hoffman and D. W. Rice. 1982. "Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 1982." Occas. Pap. Mus. Texas. Tech. Univ., No. 80. Klingbeil, R. A., R. D. Sandell and A. W. Wells. 1975. "An Annotated Checklist of the Elasmobranchs and Teleosts of Anaheim Bay." In: E. D. Land and C. W. Hill, The Marine Resources of Anaheim Bay, California. California Department of Fish Game, Fish Bull. 165. Laubitz, D. R. 1970. Studies on the Ca rellidae (Crustacea Am hi oda) of the American North aci ie. Canadian National Mus. Nat. Sci., Fubl. in io . Oceanography, 1. 89 pp. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. North Carolina State Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh, North Carolina. 867 pp.' Local Coastal Program Staff (LCP). 1980. "Background 'Report for Coastal Element: Environmentally Sensitive Habitats." Local Coastal Plan Task 3.2.7. City of Huntington Beach, California. MacArthur, R. and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island BioKeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Marine Biological Consultants, Inc. (MBC) and Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). 1980. Irvine Ranch Water District Upper Newport Bay and Stream Augmentation Program Final Report, October 1979 to August 1980. 147 pp + Appendices. Massey, B. W. 1975. "California Least Tern Census and Nesting Survey, 1975." California Department of Fish" and Game (Nongame Wildlife Investigations) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Kern Pixley N.W.R.-Endangered Species Program). 5 pp + Appendix. Massey, B. W. 1977a. "Occurrence and Nesting of the Least Tern and Other Endangered Species in Baja California, Mexico." Western Birds 8:67-70. Massey, B. W. 1977b. "A Census of the Breeding Population of the Belding's Savannah Sparrow in California, 1977:' Nongame Wildl. Invest. Job 1.2. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. 15 pp. Massey, B. W. 1980. "Avifauna, Lower Santa Ana River." Part 5. In: Santa Ana River: Phase I, GDM on the Santa Ana River Main Stem IncludinK antiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Appendix I. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District, Los Angeles, California. Massey, B. W. and J. L. Atwood. 1978. "Plumages of the Least Tern." Bird- Banding 49:360-371. Miller, D: J., and R. N. Lea. 1972. Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California. California Fish Bull. No. 157, California Department of Fish and ame, Sacramento, California. 249 pp. Miller, M. A. 1975. "Isopoda:' In: R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, eds., Light's Manual, 3rd ed. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Moyle, P. B. 1976. Inland Fishes of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp. Muns, Bob. 1983. . Santa. Monica Mountains Flora: A Checklist. Bob Muns, Arcadia, California. 41 pp. Munz, P. A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. t686 pp. Munz, P. A. and D. D. Keck. 1959. A California Flora.. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. .1681 pp. Oldroyd I. S. 1925. The Marine Shells of the West Coast of North America. Stanford Univ. Pu 1. Geol. Sci. 1. 4 Volumes. Purer, E. 1942. "Plant Ecology of the Coastal Salt Marshlands of San Diego County." Ecol. Monogr. 12:82-111. • Robbins, W. W., M. K. Bellue and W. S. Ball. 1951. Weeds of California. State of • California Department of Agriculture. 547. pp. Rypka, D. D. 1978. "California Least Tern Banding Project, 1977." California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Wildlife Investigations, Job Final Report (Project E-1-1, Job V-2.12), 7 pp. Schmitt, W.. L. 1921. "Marine Decapod Crustacea of California." Univ. of California Publ. Zool., Volume 23:1-470. Seapy, R. R. 1981. "Structure, Distribution and Seasonal Dynamics of the Benthic Community in Upper Newport Bay, California." Mar. Res. Tech. Rep. 46. 74 pp. Smith, J. P., Jr., R. J. Cole and J. O. Sawyer, Jr. 1980. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California: Special Publ. No. 1 (2nd Edition), California Native Plant Society. 115 pp. + Supplements. Stebbing, T. R. R. 1906. "Amphipoda I. Gammaridea." Das .Tierreich, Volume 21._ 806 pp. Stebbins, R. C. 1972. Amphibians and Re tiles of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. pp. Thorne, R. F. 1976. "The Vascular Plant Communities of California." In: June Latting, ed., Plant Communities of Southern California. Special Publ. No. 2, • California Native Plant Society. 164 pp. Wilbur, S. R. 1974. "The Literature of the California Least .Tern." Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Special Scientific Report, Wildlife. No. 175, Washington, D.C. 18 pp. Wilbur, S. R. 1977. "Additions to the Literature of the Clapper Rail, Black Rail and Least Tern." U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Photocopy. 26 pp. Wilson, E. O. and E. O. Willis. 1975. "Applied Biogeography." In: J. M. Diamond and M. L. Cody, eds., Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press, Harvard, Massachusetts. 545 pp. Zedler, J. B. 1982. The Ecology of Southern California Coastal Salt Marshes: A Community Pro ile. U.S. Fish and Wildl a Service, Biological Services Program, Washington, D.C. FWS/OBS-81-54.. 110 pp. • APPENDIX A FLORAL AND FAUNAL COMPENDIA FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH WETLAND • I TABLE 1-A FLPRALCPMPENDIUM[al LOCALITY SM - Salt marsh (includes ruderal elements adjacent to marshes) FWM - Freshwater marsh (includes weed-field adjacent to marsh in Unit 6) ABUNDANCEIN c - common f - frequenX o -occasional i - infrequent r - reported by others, but not found during the present survey STATUS * non-native i [a.] This is not intended as an exhaustive listing of the vegetation occurring on the site; some annual herbs_ of very uncommon species may not have been detected by the field survey. This list includes vascular plants only. [bl ' ,Thin is simply a gross indication of`relative frequency of occurrence on the site. Quantitative sampling methods were not employed to arrive at these • determinations. DICOTYLEDONAE AIZOACEAE - CARPET-WEED FAMILY SM FWM * Carpobrotus spp. 0 - ice plant * Gasoul crystallinum i - e plant * Gasoul nodiflorum o - small-flowered ice plant ASTERACEAE - SUNFLOWER FAMILY Ambrosia psilostachya o - western ragweed Aster exilis f f slender aster Baccharis douglasii o - saltmarsh baccharis Baccharis emoryi i - Emory baccharis Baccharis glutinosa i - mulefat , Chrysanthemum coronarium o - garland chrysanthemum * Cirsium vulgare i - bull thistle �Con za coulteri 0 - Co teu 's conyza * Cotula corono ifolia i o common brass-buttons Haplopappus ericoides r - salt marsh goldenbush Helianthus annuus 0 0 common sunflower Heterotheca grandiflora 0 i telegraph weed * Picris echioides - f bristly ox tongue Pluchea purpurascens 0 i marsh fleabane Solidago occidentalis o - western goldenrod ASTERACEAE - SUNFLOWER FAMILY (continued) SM FWM Sonchus oleraceus 0 a common sow thistle BATIDACEAE - BATIS FAMILY Batts to Lima 1 - saltVliOrt BORAGINACEAE = BORAGE FAMILY I4eliotropium curassavicuin. o 0 `salt heliotrope BItASSICACEAE - MUSTARD FAMILY Brassica geniculata_ o - - shoct=padded mustard * Brassica ni `ra r - black niukaM * Raptianiis satiyus_ o 0 wild radish CARYOPHYLLACEAE = PINK FAMILY Sp&giilaria inarina - o salt marsh san' d-spurrey CHENOPODIACEAE - GOOSEFOOT FAMILY Atri lex ap tula f 0 spear saltbiish Atri lex rosea i - redscale Atri lex semibaccata o 0 Australian saltbush Bassia.hyssopifolia f i five-hooked bassia * Beta vvullarts_ o - sugar eet Salieornia vir 'rhea c f commas pickleweed Salsbla iberica. i - Russian-thistle CHENOPODIACEAE - GOOSEFOOT FAMILY (continued) SM FWM Suaeda californica o California sea-blite EUPHORBIACEAE - SPURGE FAMILY * Ricinus communis o 0 castor--:5-ean FABACEAE - PEA FAMILY * Melilotus albus - o white sweet-clover FRANKENIACEAE - FRANKENIA FAMILY Frankenia grandif�olia f - alk`al! heath HYDROPHYLLACEAE - WATERLEAF FAMILY Phacelia distans o - wild-heliotrope LYTHRACEAE - LOOSE STRIFE FAMILY Lythrum h sso ifolia i - hyssop loosestrife MALVACEAE - MALLOW FAMILY Sida leprosa o - alkali-mallow MYOPORACEAE - MYOPORUM FAMILY * Myoporum laetum o 0 myoporum POLYGONACEAE - BUCKWHEAT FAMILY * Rumex cris us o 0 curly dock • J SOLANACEAE - NIGHTSHADE FAMILY SM FWM Nicotiana lg.auca i - tree tobacco MQNOCOTYLEDONAE CYPERACEAE - SEDGE FAMILY Cyperus sp. - o 'umbrella sedge Scir us californicus - c Scripus olneyi - f Olney ti*,Ush Scri us robustus - f --'Pacimast bulrush JUNCACEAE - RUSH FAMILY igpeus acutus o - sp4ny,rus.. POACEAE - GRASS FAMILY Cor-.taderia atacanjensis. - o pampas grass Distichlis s icata f - saltgrass - * Echinochloa crus alli - o water-'ass ~- Lolium ,erenne- multiflorum c Italian ryegrass * Polypogon monspeliensis o 0 rabbit's,-foot grass PO.TAMO.GETONAC$Ag- PO,ND:WEED FAMILY R�uppia maritima r - aifc;ggrass; • TYPACEAE - CAT-TAIL FAMILY Typha latifolia i o broad-leaved cat-tail Typha sp. - c cat-tail TABLE 2-A FAUNAL COMPENDIUM[al LOCALITY SM - Salt marsh (includes ruderal element adjacent to marshes) FWM - Freshwater marsh (includes weed-field adjacent to marsh in Unit 6) ABUNDANCE101 c =common f - frequent o -occasional i - infrequent r reported by others, but not found during the present survey SEASONAL STATUS (birds only) R -resident or found in vicinity year round Rq! - resident_ and breeds on or near the site S -present in-summer only S* - present in summer- only and breeds_on or near the site T - transient; present only during periods of migration W - winter visitor STATUS * non-native + observed during the present survey • (a] Species observed or expected to occur onsite. (b] Notations. of abundance are not included for birds. AMPHIBIANS PLETHODONTIDAE - LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS SM FWM Batrachoseps major - o garden slender salamander RANIDAE - TRUE FROGS * Rana catesbeiana - c bullf rog BUFONIDAE - TRUE TOADS Bufo boreas c western toad HYLIDAE- TREEFROGS Hyla re ilia - c pacific treefrog REPTILES IGUANIDAE - IGUANAS Sceloporus occidentalis o f western fence lizard Uta stansburiana f f side-blotched lizard ANGUIDAE - ALLIGATOR LIZARDS Gerrhonotus multicarinatus o f southern alligator lizard COLUBRIDAE - COLLUBRID SNAKES Diadophis punctatus - O ringneck snake Coluber constrictor i o racer Masticophis flagellum i o common whipsnake F COLUBRIDAE - COLLUBRID SNAKES (continued) SM. FWM . Pituophis melanoleucus f f gopher snake Lampropeltis zetulus - o common kingsnake Thamnophis couchi - o western aquatic garter snake VIPERIDAE.- VIPERS Crotalus viridis western rattlesnake BIRDS PODICIPEDIDAE - GREBES Podilymbus podiceps W W pied-billed grebe Podiceps nigricollis W - eared grebe ARDEIDAE - HERONS Botaurus lentiginosus W W American bittern + Ardea herodias R - great Tue heron Casmerodius albus W - great egret Egretta thula W - snowy egret Butorides striatus R R green-backed heron Nycticorax nycticorax R R black-crowned night-heron ANATIDAE WATERFOWL Branta bernicla T - brant + Anas crecca W - • green-winged teal ANATIDAE - WATERFOWL (continued) SM FWM + Anas platyrhynchos R*mallard + Anas acuta W - northern pintail Anas discors W - blue-winged teal + Anas cyanoptera W cinnamon teal Anas clypeata W - northern shoveler Anas strepera W - gadwall Anas americana W - American wigeon Aythya affinis W - lesser scaup Melanitta perspicillata W - surf scoter Melanitta fusca W - white-winged scoter Bucephala albeola W - bufflehead Mergus serrator W - red-breasted merganser Oxyura jamaicensis W - ruddy duck CATHARTIDAE - NEW WORLD VULTURES Cathartes aura T - turkey V ture ACCIPITRIDAE - HAWKS + Pandion haliaetus T - osprey + Elanus caeruleus R - black-shouldered kite Circus c aneus W - northern harrier Accipiter striatus W - sharp-shinned hawk • ACCIPITRIDAE - HAWKS (cont_inued) SM FWM Accipiter cooperii W - Cooper's'hawk Buteo jamaicensis R_ - red=tailed hawk FALCONIDAE - FALCONS + Falco sparverius R'! - American kestrel RALLIDAE - RAILS AND GALLINULES Rallus limicola W W Virginia tail Porzana carolina W W soya Fulica americans R R_ American'-coot CHARADRIIDAE - PLOVERS + Pluvialis squatarola W black- .ellied plover, Charadrius, alexandrinus R_ - snowy plover. Charadrius semipalmatus. W - semipalmated plover. + Charadrius vocifer.us R* - killdeer RECURVIROST•R.IDAE.- STILTS;AND: AVOCET-S, + Himantopus mexicanus. R* - black-necked stint Recurvirostra americans- R* - American avocet SCOLOPACIDAE - SANDPIPERS. + Trin a melanoleuca W - greater yellowlegs: Trin a flavipes W-- lesser yellowlegs SCOLOPACIDAE - SANDPIPERS (continued) SM FWM + Catoptrophorus semipalmatus W - willet + Actitis macularia W - spotted sandpiper + Numenius phaeopus W - whimbrel + Numenius americanus W - ro—ng�i a curlew + Limosa fedoa W - marbled godwit Arenaria interpres W - ruddy turnstone Arenaria melanocephala W - black turnstone Calidris canutus W - red knot Calidris alba W - sanderling + Calidris mauri W - western sandpiper + Calidris minutilla W - least sandpiper Calidris al ina W - dunlin + Limnodromus griseus W - short-billed dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus W - long-billed dowitcher Gallinago gallinago W W common snipe Phalaropus tricolor T - Wilson's phalarope Phalaropus lobatus T - red-necked phalarope Phalaropus fulicaria T - red phalarope LARIDAE - JAEGERS, GULLS AND TERNS Larus philadelphia W - Bonaparte's gull • LARIDAE - JAEGERS, BULLS AND TERNS (continued) SM FWM • + Larus heermanni R - Heermann's`gull Larus canus W - mew gull + Larus delawarensis R - ringbilled gull + Larus calif ornicus R California L1 Larus argentatus W - herring-guh Larus thayeri W - Thayer's gull + Larus occidentalis R - Western gull Larus glaucescens W - glaucous=winged gull + Sterna cas is R - Caspian tern Sterna maxima T - royal tern • Sterna ele ans S - elegant tern Sterna hirundo S - common tern + Sterna forsteri R_ - Forster's tern Sterna antillarum S - leas erg COLUMBIDAE - PIGEONS AND DOVES ' Columba livia R* - rock dove + Zenaida macroura R* - mourning dove STRIGIDAE - TRUE OWLS Athene cunicularia W - burrowing owl Asio flammeus W - • short-eared owl TROCHILIDAE - HUMMINGBIRDS SM FWM Calypte anna R* - • Anna's hummingbird ALCEDINIDAE - KINGFISHERS Ceryle alcyon R - belted kingfisher TYRANNIDAE - TYRANT FLYCATCHERS + Sayornis nigricans R* R* black phoebe Sa ornis sa a W - Say's phoebe Myiarchus cinerascens T - ash-throated flycatcher rannus verticalis T - western kingbird ALAUDIDAE - LARKS Eremophila alpestris W - horned lark HIRUNDINIDAE - SWALLOWS Tachycineta bicolor W W tree swallow Tachycineta thalassina T T violet-green swallow StelfridoQteryx serri ennis S S northern rou�d swallow Riparia ri aria T T bank swallow + Hirundo pyrrhonota S S cI i swf allow Hirundo rustica S S barn swallow CORVIDAE - JAYS AND gROIAIS SlV! FWM • + Gor..vus brachyrhynchos_ R" - 'American ciow" aA + Gorvus corax R - i —raven TR-OGLODYTIDAE - WRENS .- • i a),. a .e WRENS :-i Gistothorus palustris R-1 R* MUSGIGAPIDAE - KINGLETS, GNATGAGHTRS, THRUSHES AND BABBLERS Re . .us cale n� w w ruby-crowned kinglet MIMIDAE - THRASHERS + Mimus polylottos R - "northern`mockingbir.d i •:. el:._r . .l-••:gal e:i1 1: -t MOTACILLIDAE - PIP,ITS Anthus spinoletta w - °waterpipi-T LANIIDAE - SHRIKES + Lanius ludovicianus R R gggerTiea— j,shcike STURNID,AE - STARLINGS +* Sturnus vu aris R R �ropean•-starling EMBERIZIDAE - WO,ODrWARBLERS,.TANAG.ERS, BUNTINGS AND BLACKBIRDS Vermivora celata w IV orange=crowned warbler. Dedroica petechia T T "yellow warbler. D_endroica coronata W W . yellow=ru`mped`warbler. EMBERIZIDAE - WOOD WARBLERS, TANAGERS, BUNTINGS AND BLACKBIRDS (continued) SM FWM Oporornis tolmiei T T MacGillivray's warbler + Geothlypis trichas W W common yellowthroat + Passerculus sandwichensis R* - savannah sparrow + Melospiza melodia R* R* song sparrow Melospiza lincolnii T T Lincoln's sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla W W golden-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys W W white-crowned sparrow + Agelaius phoeniceus R* R* red-winged blackbird Agelaius tricolor - W tricolored blackbird + Sturnella ne lecta R* - western meadowlark Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus - W yellow-headed blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus R R Brewer's blackbird Molothrus ater W W brown-headed cowbird FRINGILLIDAE - FINCHES + Carpodacus mexicanus R* R* house finch + Carduelis psalt�ria R R lesser goldfinch Carduelis tristis R R American goldfinch PASSERIDAE - OLD WORLD SPARROWS * Passer domesticus - R —Troupe sparrow • 6 MAMMALS DIDELPHIDAE - OPOSSUMS SM FWM Didelphis virginiana 0 0 Virginia opossum SORICIDAE - SHREWS Sorex ornatus i f ornate shrew VESPERTILIONIDAE - EVENING BATS M otis yumanensis o 0 Yuma myotis M otis californicus f f California myotis Eptesicus fuscus f f big brown bat Nycteris cinerea i i hoary bat Plecotus townsendii o 0 lump-nosed bat Antrozous ap llidus o 0 pallid bat MOLOSSIDAE - FREE-TAILED BATS Tadarida brasiliensis 0 0 Brazilian free-tailed bat LEPORIDAE - HARES AND RABBITS Lepus calif ornicus o 0 black-tailed jackrabbit + Sylvilagus audubonii c c Audubon cottontail SCIURIDAE - SQUIRRELS + S ermo hilus beecheyi o i California ground squirrel GEOMYIDAE - GOPHERS SM FWM Thomomys umbrinus f f southern pocket gopher HETEROMYIDAE - POCKET MICE Perognathusfallax o 0 San Diego pocket mouse CRICETIDAE - NEW WORLD RATS AND MICE Reithrodontomys megalotis f. f western harvest mouse Peromyscus maniculatus f f deer mouse Microtus calif ornicus i f California vole MURIDAE - OLD WORLD RATS AND MICE * Rattus rattus o 0 black rat * Rattus norvegicus f f Norway rat * Mus musculus c c house mouse CANIDAE - WOLVES AND FOXES Canis latrans r o coyote Urocyon cinereoar enteus gray fox * Vulpes fulva redT- x PROCYONIDAE - RACOONS Procyon lotor o f raccoon MUSTELIDAE - WEASELS AND SKUNKS Mustela frenata r o long-tailed weasel Spilogale gracilis o 0 spotted skunk Mephitis mme hi�tis f f striped skunk • APPENDIX B FLORAL AND FAUNAL COMPENDIA FOR THE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS TABLE 1-B FLORAL GOMPENDIUMj LOCAUrYtbl T - Tidal portions of the flood control channels (Reaches 1-6) N Non tidal portions of the flood'control channels (Reaches 7711) ABUNCANCEICI c - common f - frequent o -occasional i - infrequent r - reported by others, bnt not found during the present survey, STATUS * non-native [al This is not intended as an exhaustive listing of vegetation occurring on the site; some annual herbs of very; uncommon_ species may not have been detected by the field survey.- The list includes vascular plants only. [b] Adams- Avenue_ is considered th boundary between tidal and non-tidal portions of the flood control system Is. portions south- of Adams Avenue IA- include, all of the Huntington Beach Channel and the southern half of Talbert Channel. Non=tidal portions include all of Fountain Valley, Channel and the 01 northern haif•�of tai lbert Channel. [cl This is simply a gross.'indication of relative. frequency of occurrence on the site. Quantitative sampling. methods were not employed to arrive at these determinations. " DICOTYLEDONAE APIACEAE - CARROT FAMILY T N • * Foeniculum vul are sweet fennel ASTERACEAE - SUNFLOWER FAMILY * Centaurea melitensis i tocalote * Cotula australis - o Australian brass-buttons * Sonchus oleraceus - o common sow thistle CHENOPODIACEAE - GOOSEFOOT FAMILY Artriplex patula - o spear saltbush * Atri lex semibaccata o Australian salbtush Salicornia virginica f - common pickleweed * Salsola iberica o 0 Russian-thistle CONVOLVULACEAE - MORNING-GLORY FAMILY Cressa truxillensis alkali weed MONOCOTYLEDONAE CYPERACEAE - SEDGE FAMILY Scri us californicus - c tule POACEAE - GRASS FAMILY * C nodon dactylon - o bermudagrass Distichlis s ip cata - o • saitgrass POACEAE - GRASS FAMILY (continued) T N Leptochloa uninervia - o sprangletop * Paspalum dilatatum - o dallas grass * Polyp2gon monspeliensis - .0 rabbit's-foot grass TABLE 2-B FAUNAL COMPENDIUM[al LOCALITY[b] T - Tidal portions of the flood control channels (Reaches 1-6) N - Non-tidal portions of the flood control channels (Reaches 7-11) ABUNDANCE[c] c - common f - frequent o -occasional i - infrequent r - reported by others, but not found during the present survey SEASONAL STATUS (birds only) R -resident or found in vicinity year round R* - resident and breeds on or near the site S - present in summer only S* - present in summer only and breeds on or near the site T - transient; present only during periods of migration W - winter visitor STATUS * non-native + observed during present survey [a] Species observed or expected to occur onsite. [b] Adams Avenue is considered to be the boundary between tidal and non-tidal portions of the flood control system. Tidal portions south of Adams Avenue include all of Huntington. Beach Channel and the southern half of Talbert Channel. [c] Notations of abundance are not included for birds. AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES • CNMARIA HYDR.OZOA - HYDROZOANS T. N + Campanularidae, unid PLATYHELMINTHES PLATYHELMINTHES - FLATWORMS + Platyhelminthes, sp. C NEVI ATODA NEMATODA - ROUND WORMS + Nemotoda, unid. c - NEMERTEA NEMER.TEA - PROBOSCIS WORMS • + Nemertea, unid. ANNELIDA OLIGOCHAETA - OLIGOCHAETES + Oligochaeta, unid. f i POLYCHAETA - POLYCHAETES + Armandia bioculata i - + Boccardia li erica f - + CapiteUa ca itata o - + Goniada littorea o - + Leitoscoloplos elongatus i - + Mediomastus ambisetus f - + Mediomastus californiensis f - + Microphthalmus sp. i - • + Microspio maculata o - + Paraonella Dlatybranchia c - POLYCHAETA - POLYCHAETES (continued) T N + Pholoides aspera i - • + Polydora ligni i - + Polydora socialis o - + Prionospio cirrif era o - + Prionospio heterobranchiata i - + Pseudopolydora pancibranchiata o - + Scololepis sp. o - + Streblospio benedicti c i ARTHROPODA ISOPODA - ISOPODS + Gnathia hirsuta i - + Jaeropsis dubia i - + Janiralata occidentalis AMPHIPODA - AMPHIPODS + Gammaridea, unid. i - + Grandidierella japonica o - + Mayerella banksia i - + Pardalisca marionis i - + Photis sp. o - DECAPODA - DECAPODS + CaUianassa sp. i - + Caridea, unid. i - + CaUinectes arcuatus i - + Hemigrapsus oregonensis o - + Pachygrapsus crassipes i - + Palaemon macrodactylus o 0 Uca crenulata r - MOLLUSCA GASTROPODA - LIMPETS AND SNAILS T N + Bulla gouldiana i - Certhidea californica r - + Cylichnella harpa o - + Cylichnella inculta o - Melampus olivaceus r - + Neverita recluziana PELECYPODA - CLAMS, MUSSELS AND SCALLOPS + Argopecten aequisulcatus i - Cancer sp. r - + Chione californiensis o - + Cryptomya calif ornica i - + Laevicardium substriatum f - Macoma_nasuta r - Mytilus edulis r - + Protothaca staminea o - + Solen rosaceus o - Ta elus calif ornicus r - + Ta elus subteres f o + Tellina carpenteri o - + Theora lubrica i - PHORONIDA PHORONIDA + Phoronida, unid. i - VERTEBRATES FISHES ATHERINIDAE - GRUNION T v + Atherinops affinis c - topsmelt Leuresthes tenuis r - California grunion BUTHIDAE - HALIBUTS + Paralichthys californica o - California halibut CICHLIDAE - CICHLIDS +* Tilapia sp. f c tilapia COTTIDAE - SCULPINS + Leptocottus armatus o staghorn sculpin CYPRINODONTIDAE - KILLIFISH + Fundulus parviginnis - f California killifish EMBIOTOCIDAE - SURFPERCHES C mato aster aggregata r - shiner sur perch ENGRAULIDIDAE - ANCHOVIES + Anchoa compressa o - deepbody anchovy GIRELLIDAE - OPALEYES + Girella nigricans f opaleye GOBUDAE - GOBIES T N • Acanthogobius flavimanus r - yellowfin goby Clevelandia ios r i arrow goby + Gillichthys mirabilis i - Iongjaw m udsucker PLEURONECTIDAE - TURBOTS + Hypsopsetta tt�ulata o - diamond tur—pot POECILIIDAE - MOLLIES, GUPPIES AND MOSQUITOFISH Gambusia affinis r r mosquitofish SERRANIDAE - SEA BASSES Paralabrax clathratus r - kelp bass' Paralabrax nebullfer r - barred sand bass AMPHIBIANS PLETHODONTIDAE - LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS Batrachose s major - o garden slender. salamander RANIDAE - TRUE FROGS * Rana catesbeiana - c bull,rog BUFONIDAE - TRUE TOADS Bufo boreas - c western toad HYLIDAE - TREEFROGS T N Hyla re ills - c pacific treefrog REPTILES IGUANIDAE - IGUANAS Sceloporus occidentalis - f westerner lizard Uta stansburiana o 0 side-blotched lizard ANGUIDAE -.ALLIGATOR LIZARDS Gerrhonotus multicarinatus - f southern alligator lizard COLUBRIDAE - COLUBRID SNAKES Diadophis punctatus - o ringneck snake Pituo his melanoleucus - f gopher snake Lampropeltis getulus - o common kingsnake Thamnophis couchi - o western aquatic garter snake VIPER.IDAE - VIPERS Crotalus viridis western rattlesnake BIRDS GAVIIDAE - LOONS Gavia stellata W - red-throated loon Gavia arctica W - arctic loon Gavia immer W - common loon PODICIPEDIDAE - GREBES T N Podilymbus podiceps W pied-billed grebe Podiceps auritus W - horned grebe Pod�icepss nigricollis W - eared gr Aechmophorus occidentalis W - western grebe PELECANIDAE - PELICANS Pelecanus occidentalis W - brown pelican PHALACROCORACrDAE - CORMORANTS Phalacrocorax auritus W - double-crested cormorant ARDEIDAE - HERONS Botaurus lentiginosus - W American bittern + Ardea herodias R R great STU-67ieron + Casmerodius albus W W great egret Egretta thula W W snowy egret + Butorides striatus R R green-backed heron + Nycticorax nycticorax R R black-crowned night-heron ANATIDAE - WATERFOWL Branta bernicla T - brant Anas crecca W W green-winged teal Anas platyrhynchos R R • mallard ANATIDAE - WATERFOWL T . N Anas acuta W W northern pintail Anas discors W W blue-winged teal Anas cyanoptera W W cinnamon teal Anas clypeata W W northern shoveler Anas stre era W W gadwall Anas americana W W American wigeon Aythya valisineria W - canvasback Aythya marila W - greater scaup Aythya affinis W - lesser scaup Melanitta perspicillata W - surf scoter Melanitta fusca W - white-winged scoter Bucephala clan�la W - common goldeneye Bucephala albeola W - bufflehead + Mergus serrator W - red-breasted merganser Oxyura jamaicensis W - ruddy duck ACCIPITRIDAE - HAWKS Pandion haliaetus T - osprey FALCONIDAE - FALCONS + Falco sparverius R* R* American kestrel RALLIDAE - RAILS AND GALLINULES T N • Rallus limicola - W Virginia rail Porzana carolina - W sora Fulica americans W W American coot CHARADRIIDAE - PLOVERS + Pluvialis squatarola W W black-bellied plover + Charadrius semipalmatus W - semipalmated plover + Charadrius vociferus R* R* killdeer RECURVIROSTRIDAE - STILTS AND AVOCETS + Himantopus mexicanus R R black-necked stilt • Recurvirostra americana R - American avocet SCOLOPACIDAE - SANDPIPERS + Trin a melanoleuca W W greater yellowlegs Trin a flavipes W W lesser yellowlegs + Catoptrophorus semipalmatus W - willet + Actitis macularia W W spotted sandpiper + Numenius phaeopus W - whimbrel + Numenius americanus W - long-billed curlew + Limosa fedoa W - marbled godwit Arenaria interpres W - ruddy turnstone • SCOLOPACIDAE - SANDPIPERS (continued) T N Calidris alba W sanderling + Calidris mauri W - western sandpiper + Calidris minutilla W - least sandpiper Caldris alpina W - dunlin + Limnodromus griseus W W short-billed dowitcher Limnodromus scolopaceus W W long-billed dowitcher Gallinago gallinago W W common snipe Phalaropus tricolor T - W ilson's phalarope Phalaropus lobatus T red-necked phalarope Phalaropus fulicaria T - red phalarope LARIDAE - JAEGERS GULLS AND D TERNS Larus philadelphia W - Bonaparte's gull + Larus heermanni R - Heermann's gull Larus canus W - mew gull + Larus delawarensis R W ring-billed gull + Larus californicus R W California gull Larus argentatus W - herring gull Larus thayeri W - Thayer's gull + Larus occidentalis R R western gull Larus glaucescens W - glaucous-winged gull LARIDAE - JAEGERS, GULLS AND TERNS (continued) T N + Sterna caspia R R Caspian tern Sterna maxima - - royal tern Sterna ele ans S - elegant tern Sterna hirundo S - common tern Sterna forsteri R - Forster's tern Sterna antillarum R - least tern COLUMBIDAE - PIGEONS AND DOVES +* Columba livia R* R* rock dove +* Streptopelia chinensis R* R* spotted dove + Zenaida macroura R* R* mourning e TYTONIDAE - BARN-OWLS to alba R* R* common barn-owl STRIGIDAE -TRUE OWLS Athene cunicularia W - burrowing owl TROCHILIDAE - HUMMINGBIRDS Cal to anna R* R* Anna's hummingbird ALCEDINIDAE - KINGFISHERS Ceryle alcyon R R belted kingfisher TYRANNIDAE - TYRANT FLYCATCHERS _ T N + S8 ornis nigricans R* R* black phoebe HIRUNDINIDAE - SWALLOWS Tachycineta bicolor W - tree swallow Tachycineta thalassina T T violet-green swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis S* S* northern rough-winged swallow. Ri aria ri aria T T bank swallow + Hirundo pyrrhonota S* S* Cliff'swallow + Hirundo rustica S* S* barn swallow CORVIDAE - JAYS AND CROWS + Corvus brachyrhynchos R* R* American crow Corvus corax R R common raven MIMIDAE - THRASHERS + Mimus Polyglottos R* R* northern mockingbird MOTACILLIDAE - PIPITS Anthus spinoletta W W water pipit LANIIDAE - SHRIKES + Lanius ludovicianus R* R* loggerhead shrike STURNIDAE - STARLINGS +* Sturnus vulgaris R* R* European starling EMBERIZIDAE =;WOOD WARBLERS, TANAGERS, BUNTINGS • AND BLACKBIRDS T N D:e idroica eoronata W. ye1lb-W4 tmped warbler ZonotriLhia aiHddoilla W W goldenw!bfdWhdd sparrow Zbhotrichia ieucophr-ys W W white-;-crowned `sparrow elaius iih niceus R R* red-winged [ilackbicd A"elaiu"s. 3A66i4 - W tHdijl&td blddkbiM + �EEu_pph.a-b�us c: anote"fialus R R* Brewer S ac t bir FRINGILLIDAE FINCHES + Carpodacus iiiexiea#iu's". R* R* hound fihbh Loxfa .urvitostr'a - - • re" cross _i Carduelis.'saltna R* R* lesser go h ld inc CaMU61lis.tr.istiS R R. AffiWcMh goldfihdh PASSEIt.IDAE = OL'D WORLD SPARROWS +* Passec doinesticus R R* —7 ouse sparrow MAMMALS DIDELPHIDAE = OPOSSUMS * Didel6 is .virginiana o 0 Vir'giiiia opossum SORICIDAE - SHREWS Sorex ornatus_ i f ornate shrew VESPERTILIONIDAE - EVENING BATS T N M otis yumanensis 0 0 . Yuma myotis M otis calif ornicus f f California myotis Eptesicus fuscus f f big brown bat Nycteris cinerea i i hoary bat Plecotus townsendii 0 0 lump-nosed bat Antrozous pallidus o .o pallid bat MOLOSSIDAE - FREE-TAILED BATS Tadarida brasiliensis o 0 Brazilian n ee-tailed bat LEPORIDAE - HARES AND RABBITS Lepus calif ornicus i - black-tailed jackrabbit + Sylvilagus audubonii f f Audubon cottontail SCIURIDAE - SQUIRRELS + Spermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel GEOMYIDAE - GOPHERS Thomomys umbrinus southern pocket gopher CRICETIDAE - NEW WORLD RATS AND MICE Reithrodontomys megalotis - f western harvest mouse Peromyscus maniculatus i f deer mouse Microtus calif ornicus - f California vole MURIDAE - OLD WORLD RATS AND MICE T N * Rattus rattus o 0 black rat * R.attus norvegicus f f Norway rat * Mus musculus c c house mouse CANIDAE - WOLVES AND FOXES Canis latrans coyote PROCYONIDAE - RACCOONS Procyon lotor 0 0 raccoon MUSTELIDAE - WEASELS AND SKUNKS Mustela frenata 0 0 • long-tailed weasel . Spilogale gracilis o 0 spotted skunk Mephitis mephitis 0 f striped skunk • APPENDIX C FLORAL AND FAUNAL COMPENDIA FOR BARTLETT PARK • TABLE 1-C FLORAL COMPENDIUM[ LOCALITY BP - Bartlett Park ABUNDANCEN c - common f - frequent o -occasional i - infrequent STATUS * non native i [a] This is not intended as an exhaustive listing of the vegetation occurring on the site; some annual herbs of very uncommon species may not have been detected by the field survey. The list includes vascular plants only. [b] This is simply a gross indication of relative frequency of occurrence on the • site. Quantitative sampling methods were not employed to- arrive at these- determinations. DICOTYLEDONAE AIZOACEAE - CARPET-WEED FAMILY BP • *. Car obrotus aequilaterus f sea-fig * Car obrotus edulis o ottentot fig APOCYNACEAE - DOGBANE FAMILY Vinca major i periwinkle ASTERACEAE - SUNFLOWER FAMILY Ambrosia psilostachya c western ragweed Baccharis error i o Emory baccharis Baccharis glutinosa i mulefat * Lactuca serriola i • prickly lettuce * Picris echioides f bristly tongue Solids o ccidentalis f western goldenrod * Sonchus oleraceus o common sow thistle * Xanthium strumarium f cocklebur BORAGINACEAE - BORAGE FAMILY. Heliotro ium curassavicum o salt heliotrope BRASSICACEAE - MUSTARD FAMILY * Brassies geniculata i short-podded mustard * Lobularia martima i • sweet-alyssum BRASSICACEAE - MUSTARD FAMILY (continued) BP * Raphanus sativus o wild radish CHENOPODIACEAE - GOOSEFOOT FAMILY Atri lex ap tula o spear saltbush * Atriplex rosea o redscale * Chenopodium album i lamb's quarters * Chenopodium ambrosioides o Mesican tea * Chenopodium morale o nettle-leaved goosefoot EUPHORBIACEAE - SPURGE FAMILY Euphorbia olp ycarpa i golondrina * Ricinus communis f castor-bean FABACEAE - PEA FAMILY * Melilotus albus o white sweet-clover * Melilotus indicus o yellow sweet-clover MALVACEAE - MALLOW FAMILY Sida leprosy f alkali-mallow MYRTACEAE - MYRTLE FAMILY * Eucalyptus globulus o blue gum I I ONAGRACEAE - EVENING-PRIMROSE FAMILY BP Epilobium adenocaulon i • California cottonweed PLANTAGINACEAE - PLANTAIN FAMILY * Plantago major f common plantain POLYGONACEAE - BUCKWHEAT FAMILY Polygonum aviculare o common knotweed * Rumex crispus o curly dock ROSACEAE - ROSE FAMILY Rubus ursinus o California blackberry SALICACEAE - WILLOW FAMILY Salix gooddingii f black willow Salix laevigata o red willow Salix lasiolepis f arroyo willow SOLANACEAE - NIGHTSHADE FAMILY * Nicotiana glau��ca o tree tobacco Solarium do4lasii i Douglas' nightshade ZYGOPHYLLACEAE - CALTROP FAMILY * Tribulus terrestris i puncture vine MONOCOTYLEDONAE CYPERACEAE _ SEDGE FAMILY BP Cyperus eragrostis f umbrella sedge Cyoerus erythrorhizos o red-'rooted sedge Eleocharis thacrostachya o pale spike-rush Scirpus californicus c tule Scir"us olneyi f Olney bulrush Scir. us robustus o Pacific coast bulrush JUNCACEAE RUSH FAMILY Juncus torreyi o Torrey rush LEMNACEAE - DUCKWEED FAMILY Lemna minima i east ducKweed POACEAE - GRASS FAMILY * Bromus diandrus o pir gutgrass * Bromus rubens f red brome * Bromus willdenovii o rescue grass * Cortaderia atacamensis i pampas grass * Cynodon dactylon c ermu agragrass * Echinochloa crus alli o watergrass * Hordeum leporinum o Mail barley POACEAE - GRASS FAMILY (continued) BP * Lolium erp erne multiflorum c Italian ryegrass * Paspalum dilatatum f dallis grass TYPHACEAE - CAT-TAIL FAMILY Typha latifolia o broad-leaved cat-tail • TABLE 2-C FAUNAL COMPENDIUM[al LOCALITY BP - Bartlett Park ABUNDANCE[b] c - common f - frequent o -occasional i - infrequent SEASONAL STATUS (birds only) R - resident or found in vicinity year round R* - resident and breeds on or near the site S _ - present in summer only S* - present in summer only and breeds on or near the site T - transient; present only during periods of migration .W - winter visitor STATUS * non-native + observed during the present survey • [a] Species observed or expected to occur onsite. [b] Notations of abundance are not included for birds. AMPHIBIANS PLETHODONTIDAE - LUNGLESS SALAMANDERS BP Batrachoseps major f garden slender salamander RANIDAE - TRUE FROGS * Rana catesbeiana c bullf rog BUFONIDAE - TRUE TOADS Bufo boreas c western toad HYLIDAE - TREEFROGS Hyla regilla c Pacific treefrog REPTILES IGUANIDAE - IGUANAS Scelo op rus occidentalis c western fence lizard Uta stansburiana c side-blotched lizard Phrynosoma coronatum i coast hornedh azaFd SCINCIDAE - SKINKS Eumeces skiltonianus o western skink ANGUIDAE - ALLIGATOR, LIZARDS Gerrhonotus multicarinatus f southern aIIiga or zard r COLUBRIDAE - COLUBRID SNAKES BP Diadophis punctatus o ringheck snake Coluber constrictor o 'racer Masticophis.flagellum, o common whipsnake Arizona ele -fins o glossy snake Pituophis ineianoleucus f gopher snake Larbpropeitis eg tulus o com Trion kingsnake Thamriophis couchi f western aquatic garter snake VIPERIDAE _ VIPERS Crotalus.viridis o western 'rattlesnake BIRDS PODICIPEDIDAE = GREBES Podilyrribus podiceps W pied-billed grebe CATHARTIDAE - NEW WORLD VULTURES Cathartes aura T turkey vulture ACCIPITRIDAE.= HAWKS Elanus caeruleus. T black-shouldered kite Accipiter striatus W sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter coo erii_ H1 Cooper's hawk + Buteo-lineatus . R* red-§bouldered hawk ACCIPITRIDAE - HAWKS (continued) BP Buteo jamaicensis R • red-tailed hawk FALCONIDAE - FALCONS + Falco ssparverius R* American kestrel PHASIANIDAE - PHEASANTS AND QUAILS Callipepla californica R* California quail RALLIDAE - RAILS AND GALLINULES Rallus limicola W Virginia rail Porzana carolina W sore Fulica americana W American SCOLOPACIDAE - SANDPIPERS Gallinago gallinago W common snipe COLUMBIDAE - PIGEONS AND DOVES +* Columba livia R* rock dove +* Streptopelia chinensis R* spotted dove Zenaida macroura R* mourning dove TYTONIDAE - BARN-OWLS to albs R* common barn-owl STRIGIDAE - TRUE OWLS BP Bubo virginianus R* great horned owl APODIDAE - SWIFTS Chaetura vauxi T Vaux's-swift TROCHILIDAE - HUMMINGBIRDS + Archilochus alexandri S* black-chinned hummingbird + Ca-lypte anna R* Anna's`hummingbird + Calypte,costae T Gosta's hummingbird Selasphorus ru_fus T rufous hummingbird Selasphorus sasin T Allen's hummingbird PICIDAE - WOODPECKERS S h. ra icus ruber W `red=breasted'-sapsucker P,icoides nuttallii R.* Nuttall's woodpecker Picoides pubescens R* downy woodpecker ,. Colaptes auratus R_ northern flicker TYRA,NNIDAE - TYRANT FLYCATCHERS Contopus borealis T olive-sided flycatcher Contopus sordidulus T Western wood=pewee Empidonax traillii T willow�lycatcher Empidonax hammondii T Hammond's flycatcher TYRANNIDAE - TYRANT FLYCATCHERS (continued) BP + Empidonax difficilis T western flycatcher + Sa ornis nigricans R* black phoebe Myiarchus cinerascens T ash-throated flycatcher rannus vociferans R* Cassin's kingbird rannus verticalls T western kingbird HIRUNDINIDAE - SWALLOWS Tachycineta bicolor T tree swallow Tachycineta thalassina T violet-green swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis T northern rough-winged swallow �Ri aria riParia T bank swallow + Hirundo pyrrhonota T cliff swallow Hirundo rustica T barn swallow CORVIDAE - JAYS AND CROWS + Aphelocoma coerulescens R* scrub jay + Corvus brachyrhynchos R* American crow + Corvus corax R common raven PARIDAE - TITMOUSES Parus inornatus R plain titmouse AEGITHALIDAE - BUSHTITS + Psal�tri a_rus minimus R* bushtit TROGLODYTIDAE - WRENS BP • + Thryomanes bewickii R* Bewick's wren + Throglodytes aedon R* house wren Cistothorus pOustris W marsh wren MUSCICAPIDAE - KINGLETS, GNATCATCHERS, THRUSHES AND BABBLERS Regulus calendula W ruby�roWhed kinglet Polioptila caerulea W blu"tay gnatcatcher Catharus ustulatus T Swainson's thrush Catharus tgu tatus W hermit thrush Turdus migratorius W American robin MIMIDAE - THRASHERS + Mimus eolyglottos R* northern mockingbird BOMBYCILLIDAE.- WAXWINGS Bombycilla cedrorum W cedar waxwing LANIIDAE - SHRIKES + Lanius ludovicianus R* loggerhead shrike STURNIDAE - STARLINGS +* Sturnus vulzaris R* European starling i VIREONIDAE - VIREOS BP Vireo solitarius T , solitary vireo Vireo ig lvus T warbling vireo EMBERIZIDAE - WOOD WARBLERS, TANAGERS, BUNTINGS AND BLACKBIRDS + Vermivora celata R* orange-crowned warbler Vermivora rufica ilia T Nashville warbler Dendroica petechia T yellow warbler Dendroica coronata W yellow-rumped warbler Dendroica nigrescens T black-throated gray warbler Dendroica townsendi T Townsend's warbler Dendroica occidentalis T hermit warbler Oporornis tolmiei T MacGillivray's warbler + Geothlypis trichas W common yellowthroat + Wilsonia pusilla T Wilson's warbler Piran a ludoviciana T western tanager Pheucticus melanoce halos S* ac c- ea a grosbeak + Passerina amoena T lazuli bunting + Pi ilo erythrophthalmus R* rufous-sided towhee + Pi ilo fuscus R* brown towhee S izella passerina T chipping sparrow Passerella iliaca W fox sparrow + Melospiza melodia* R* • song sparrow EMBERIZIDAE WOOD WARBLERS, TANAGERS, BUNTINGS AND BLACKBIRDS (continued) B.P Melospiza lincolnii W Lincoln's sparrow Zonotrichia atricapilla W golden-crowned sparrow Zonotrichia leucophrys W white-crowned sparrow Junco hyemalis W dark-eyed junco + Agelalus phoeniceus R* red-:winged blackbird A elaius tricolor W tricolored blackbird + Sturnella neklecta W western meadowlark Xanthocephalus kanthocephalus W. yellow-headed blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus R* Brewer's blackbird Molothrus ater R* brown-Treaded cowbird Icterus cucullatus S* hooded "oriole + Icterus alg bula S* northern oriole FRINGILLIDAE - FINCHES Carpodacus purpureus W purple finch + Carpodacus mexicanus R* house finch Carduelis ip nus W pine siskin + Carduelis psaltria R* lesser goldfinch Carduelis lawrencei T Lawrence's goldfinch Carduelis tristis R* American goldfinch PASSERIDAE - OLD WORLD SPARROWS BP +* Passer domesticus R* house sparrow MAMMALS DIDELPHIDAE - OPOSSUMS * Didelphis virginiana f . Virginia opossum SORICIDAE - SHREWS Sorex ornatus f ornate shrew TALPIDAE - MOLES Scapanus latimanus o broad-handed mole VESPERTILIONIDAE - EVENING BATS M otis yumanensis o Yuma myotis Myotis calif ornicus f California myotis Eptesicus fuscus f big brown bat Nycteris cinerea i hoary bat Plecotus townsendii U lump-nosed bat Antrozous pallidus O . pallid bat MOLOSSIDAE - FREE-TAILED BATS Tadarida brasiliensis o Brazilian free-tailed bat LEPORIDAE - HARES AND RABBITS BP + Sylvilagus audubonii f Audubon cottontail SCIURIDAE - SQUIRRELS Spermophilus beecheyi f California ground squirrel GEOMYIDAE - GOPHERS Thomomys umbrinus c southern p— oc cet gopher HETEROMYIDAE - POCKET MICE Perognathus fallax c SanDiego ocket mouse CRICETIDAE - NEW WORLD RATS AND MICE • Reithrodontomys megalotis c western harvest mouse Peromyscus maniculatus c deer mouse Onychomys torridus o southern grasshopper mouse Neotoma fusci es f dusky-footed wood rat Microtus californicus c California vole MURIDAE - OLD WORLD RATS AND MICE * Rattus rattus o black rat * Rattus norvegicus f Norway rat * Mus musculus c house mouse CANIDAE - WOLVES AND FOXES BP Canis latrans o coyote Urocyon cinereoargenteus i gray fox * Vul es fulva i red fox PROCYONIDAE - RACCOONS Procyon lotor f raccoon MUSTELIDAE - WEASELS AND SKUNKS Mustela frenata o long-tailed weasel Spilogale gracilis o spotted skunk Mephitis mephitis f striped skunk APPENDIX .E • AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS • • AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT September 14, 1984 The Arroyo Group Planners, Architects and Associated Disciplines 40 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91105 • Air Quality Impact Assessment Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Environmental Huntington Beach is located in the South Coast Air Setting Basin. Generally, air pollution in the basin is a regional problem. Pollution levels in Huntington Beach are a result not only of local emissions, but also those in other parts of Orange County. Tables 1 through 3 summarize air quality for selected pollutants in Costa Mesa, which is the closest site to Huntington Beach at which pollutant levels are recorded. Concentrations reflect a slow decline over the past 15 years as motor vehicle pollution controls become more stringent and apply to larger portions of the vehicle fleet, Because of low average wind speeds in the summer and a persistent daytime temPerature inversion, emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen have an opportunity to combine in sunlight in a complex series of reactions producing photochemical oxidant (smog). The National Ambient Air Quaility Standard for oxidant is expected to be the most difficult of the standards to achieve An the region. Pollutants. emitted in the Huntington Beach area contribute to the regional oxidant problem. • The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have Prepared an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) which has been forwarded through the State of California as part of the State Implementation Plan for compliance with the Clean Air Act. The State Implementation Plan is now being reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If EPA approves the plan, the control measures contained in the plan will become requirements for local implementation. The AQMP does not project compliance with the National Ambient Air -Quality Standards by 1987 for all pollutants under the development projections of the SCAG-82 Growth Forecast Policy. Achievement of emission reductions forecast by the AQMP will require institution of a large number of control measures included in the plan including: o Additional restrictions on vehicle emissions. o Annual inspection and maintenance program for light and medium duty vehicles. o Transportation control measures including encouragement of high occupancy vehicles, physical improvements-to roadways and transit system improvements. 1 o Additional stationary source controls . TABLE 1 NUMBER OF DAYS FEDERAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WERE EXCEEDED DURING 1983 CARBON SULFUR OZONEI MONOXIDE 2 DIOXIDES TSP4 LEADS Long Beach 16 7 0 3 0 Lynwood 27 31 0 3 0 Los Angeles 69 8 0 4 0 Pico Rivera 98 3 0 7 0 Whittier 67 4 0 NM NM La Habra 64 6 0 6 0 Anaheim 40 3 0 2 0 Los Alamitos 16 NM 0 1 0 Costa Mesa 15 1 0 MR MI Pomona 102 0 NM NM NM Riverside 121 0 0 28 0 E1 Toro 24 0 NM 1 0 NM Not measured at this station. 1 Days Ozone exceeded 0.12 parts per million, 1-hour average. 2 Days CO exceeded 9 parts per million, 8-hour average. 3 Days SO2 exceeded 0. 14 parts per million, 24-hour average. 4 Days TSP exceeded .150 ug/cubic meter, 24-hour average. 5 Quarters lead exceeded 1.5 ug/cubic meter, quarterly average. TABLE 2 NUMBER OF DAYS OZONE EPISODE CRITERIA WERE REACHED IN 1982 STAGE 1 STAGE 2 (hourly average equal or (hourly average equal or greater than 0.20 ppm) greater than 0.35 ppm) 1982 1981 1982 1981 Long Beach 1 1 0 0 Lynwood 2 1 0 0 Los Angeles 7 8 1 0 Pico Rivera 18 28 1 0 Whittier 7 18 0 0 La Habra 12 15 0 0 Anaheim 7 5 0 0 Los Alamitos 2 0 0 0 Costa Mesa 0 1 0 0 Pomona 31 32 0 0 Riverside 26 34 0 0 El Toro 3 5 0 0 2 TABLE 3 NUMBER OF DAYS STATE AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WERE EXCEEDED AND ANNUAL MAXIMUM HOURLY AVERAGE DURING 1983 CARBON SULFUR NITROGEN OZONEI MONOXIDE 2 DIOXIDES DIOXIDE Days - Max -1 Days Max Days Max Days Max Long Beach 35 0.30 7 14 0 0. 12 3 0.37 Lynwood 57 0.23 34 24 0 0.06 1 0.27 Los Angeles 114 0.26 10 17 0 0.07 5 0.33 Pico Rivera 133 0.33 4 14 0 0.08 4 0.31 Whittier 100 0,32 . 7 16 0 0.09 4 0.32 La Habra 100 0.27 6 22 0• 0.05 . 3' 0.33 Anaheim 74 0.30 5 17 0 0.05 0 0.24 Los Alamitos 42 0.20 NM NM 0 0.05 NM NM- Costa Mesa 41 • 0.25 1 14 0 0.04 1 0.27 Pomona 135 0.34 0 15 . NM NM 0 0.21 kiverside 152 0.36 0 . 8 0 0.02 0 0.19 El Toro 54 0.29 0 7 NM NM NM NM 1 Maximum 14our = single highest 1-hour average -of the year in ppm 2 Number of days 8-hour average CO > 9 ppm 3 Days 24-hour average > .05 ppm with exceedance of TSP or 03 standard NM Pollutant not monitored at this station. NUMBER OF DAYS STATE AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WERE EXCEEDED AND ANNUAL MAXIMUM DAILY/MONTHLY AVERAGE DURING 1982 TSP1 SUuLFATE EAD Days2 MaxS Days Z MaxS Days .Long Beach 16 213 1 30.8 0 1.81 Lynwood 22 232 1 27.6 0 2.48 Pico Rivera 37 211 1 34.8 0 2.03 Whittier NM NM NM NM NM NM La Habra 16 204 0 19.7 0 1.59 Anaheim 11 176 0 24.4 0 1.47 Los Alamitos 16 175 1 26.3 0 1.52 Costa Mesa NM NM NM NM NM NN Pomona NM NM NM NM NM NM Riverside 37 285 1 27. 1 .0 0.92 El Toro 5 158 0 21.2 0 0.74 1 Total Suspended Particulates. 2 Number of days/months violating state standard for pollutant. 3 Highest 24-hour average of year, ug/cubic meter. 4 Highest monthly average of year, ug/cubic meter. Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Data, 1983. 3 Air Pollutant Effects. Air pollutants have a number of adverse imp is on human health, result in degradation of materials and finishes, and are harmful to sensitive plants. The sources and effects of various. contaminants are discussed briefly below, as reported by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Carbon Monoxide (CO3). Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odor ess— to gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon-containing substances. Carbon monoxide concen ' trations are usually higher in the winter when more fuel is burned and meteorological conditions favor the buildup of directly emitted contaminants. In the South Coast Air Basin, gasoline-powered motor vehicles are the largest source of this contaminant. Carbon monoxide does not irritate the respiratory tract, but passes through the lungs directly into the bloodstream. By interfering with transfer of fresh oxygen to the blood, carbon monoxide deprives sensitive tissues, primarily the heart and brain, of oxygen. It is not known to have adverse effects on vegetation, visibility or material objects. Oxides of Nitrogen (NO ). Two oxides of nitrogen are important in a r ppollulion. These are nitric oxide (NO), a colorless, odorless gas formed from atmospheric- nitrogen and oxygen when combustion takes place under high temperature and/or high pressure, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a reddish-brown, irritating gas formed by the combination of nitric oxide with oxygen. Motor vehicles are the primary source of oxides of nitrogen in the region, along with combustion in power plants. Some petroleum refining operations, other industrial sources, ships, railroads and aircraft operations are less important sources. Oxides of nitrogen are direct participants in photochemical smog .reactions. The emitted compound, nitric oxide, combines with oxygen in the atmosphere, in- the presence .of hydrocarbons and sunlight, to form nitrogen dioxide and- ozone. Nitrogen dioxide can color the atmosphere at concentrations as low as 0.5 parts per million on days of 10-mile visibility. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)' Sulfur dioxide is a colorless, pungent, irritating gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. In humid atmospheres, some of it may be changed to sulfur trioxide and sulfuric acid mist, with some of the latter eventually reacting with other materials to produce sulfate particulates. 4 In the South Coast Air Basin, fuel combustion is the primary source of S021 while chemical plants, sulfur recovery plants, and metal processing are minor sources. Introduc- tion of low sulfur fuel oil , beginning in 1968, lowered S02 emissions. Shortages of natural gas have resulted in greater use of low sulfur fuel oil , possibly adversely affecting air quality. At sufficiently high concentrations, sulfur dioxide irri- tates the upper respiratory tract; at lower concentrations in combination with particulates, it appears able to do still greater harm by injuring lung tissues. Sulfur oxides, in combination with moisture and oxygen, can yellow the leaves of plants, dissolve marble and eat away iron and steel . Sulfur oxides can also limit visibility and cut down the light from the sun. Photochemical Oxidant (0 ), The term "photochemical oxi- 'dant can inc u e severa f different pollutants, but con- sists primarily of ozone (more than 90%), and a group of chemicals called organic peroxynitrates. Photochemical oxidants are created in the atmosphere and are not emitted directly into the air. Reactive hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen are the emitted contaminants which participate in the reaction. Ozone is a pungent, colorless, toxic gas which is produced by the photochemical process. Photochemical oxidant reaches its highest concentrations in the summer and early fall when ultraviolet energy from the sun and other conditions are most suitable for oxidant-producing reactions. Motor vehicles are the major source of emission of oxides of nitrogen and reactive hydrocarbons (principal ozone precursors) in the South Coast Air Basin. The common effects of oxidants are damage to vegetation and cracking of untreated rubber. Photochemical oxidants in high concentrations can also directly affect the lungs, causing respiratory irritation and possible changes i*n lung function. Particulates. Atmospheric particulates are made up of finely divided solids- or liquids such as soot, dust, aerosols, fumes and mists. About 90%, by weight, of the emitted particles are larger than 10 microns, but about 90%, by number, of particulates are less than 5 microns in diameter. The aerosols formed in the atmosphere are usually smaller than 1 micron. In areas close to major sources, particulate concentrations are generally higher in the winter, when more fuel is burned and meteorological conditions favor the buildup of directly emitted contaminants. However, in areas remote from• major sources and subject to photochemical smog, particulate concen- trations are higher during summer months. 5 Particulate matter consists of particles in the atmosphere • resulting from many kinds of dust and fume-producing industrial and agricultural operations, construction, from combustion products, including automobile exhaust, and from atmospheric photochemical reactions. Some natural activities such as wind-raised dust and ocean spray, also emit particulates into the atmosphere. In the respiratory tract, very small particles of certain substances may produce injury by themselves, or may act in conjunction with gases to alter their deposition sites and scope of action. Suspended in the air, particulates of aerosol size can both scatter and absorb sunlight, reducing the amount of solar energy reaching the earth, producing haze and reducing visibility. They can also cause a wide range of damage to materials. Hydrocarbons and Other Organic Gases. This group of po I lutants-1n_c7_ud_es__t_he' many compounds consisting of hydrogen and carbon, found especially in fossil fuels. Some hydrocarbons are highly photochemically reactive. Hydrocarbon concentrations are generally higher in winter because the reactive hydrocarbons react more slowly then and can accumulate in the atmosphere to higher concentrations. The major source of reactive hydrocarbons in the South Coast Air Basin is now the internal combustion engine of motor vehi- cles. Minor sources include petroleum refining, petroleum marketing operations, and evaporation of organic solvents. Certain hydrocarbons, such as ethylene, damage plants by inhibiting growth and causing flowers and leaves to fall . Levels of hydrocarbons commonly measured in urban areas are not known to cause adverse effects in humans. Environmental Project Emissions. Emissions resulting from the proposed Impact project will occur only while improvements are being made to the existing flood control system. The proposed project involves improving the flow and capacity within the existing channel right-of-ways. The channels may be widened and may be lined with concrete. A retention basin may be established to store excess water until it can be safely pumped into a flood control channel . Emissions from the proposed project will occur only during construction. There are two types of construction-related impacts that will affect the air quality - vehicle emission by construction equipment, especially by deisel powered equipment, and dust created by construction activities. The Environmental Protection Agency has estimated dust emissions during construction to be 1.2 tons per acre of 6 • construction per month of activity, or 110 pounds per acre per working day. The effects of dust are discussed above under Particulates. The Environmental 'Protection Agency has also estimated the emissions caused by construction equipment during construction. These emission estimates are shown below in Tables 4 and 5. The proposed project is consistent with. the Air Quality Management Plan which is based on the Huntington Beach General Plan, on which regional projections for population, housing and employment were based, and is therefore consistent with the regional growth management plan. TABLE 4 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS EMISSION -FACTORS FOR HEAVY-DUTY, DIESEL-POWERED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT . ----------------------POLLUTANT (GM/HR)------------------ Type of Carbon Exhaust Nitrogen Sulfer Equipment Monoxide Hydrocarbons Oxides Oxides Particulates Tracklaying Tractor 175.0 50. 1 665 62. 3 50.7 Wheeled Tractor 973.0 67.2 451 40.9 61.5 Wheeled Dozer 335.0 106.0 2290 158.0 75.0 Scraper 660.0 284.0 2820 210.0 184.0 Motor Grader 97.7 24.7 478 39.0 27.7 Wheeled Loader 251.0 84.7 1090 82.5 77.9 Tracklaying Loader 72.5 14.5 265 34.4 26.4 Off-Highway Truck 610.0 198.0 3460 206.0 116.0 Roller 83.5 24.7 474 30.5 22.7 Miscellaneous 188.0 71.4 1030 64.7 63.2 . Source: Environmental Protection Agency, AP-42, August 1977. 7 TABLE 5 EMISSION FACTORS FOR HEAVY-DUTY • GASOLINE-POWERED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ----------------------------POLLUTANT--------------------------- Evapo- Crank- Carbon Exhaust rative case Type of Mon- Hydro- Hydro- Hydro- Mitrogen Sulfer Partic- Equipment oxide Carbons carbons carbons Oxides Dioxide ulates Wheeled Tractor 4320 164 30.9 32.6 195 7.03 10.9 Motor Grader 5490 186 30.0 37. 1 145 7.59 9.4 Wheeled Loader 7060 241 29.7 48.2 235 10.60 13.5 Roller 6080 277 28.2 55.5 164 8.38 11.8 Miscella- neous 7720 254 25.4 50.7 187 10.60 11.7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency, AP-42, August 1977. • Mitigation Although the project itself is not expected to contribute Measures significantly to regional pollution levels, the total of projects constructed in the South Coast Air Basin in the next 10 to 20 years has a potential to adversely affect air quality. Measures to reduce air pollution emissions in the region may be adopted as part of the Air Quality Management Plan. These measures cannot be assured at this time because they depend on regional policies and other actions which are outside the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach. There are several measures to reduce fugitive dust caused by construction activities during flood control channel improvements. Dust emission levels can be reduced about 50% through dust control such as regular watering and by about 75% on compacted and watered roadway surfaces. Watering down dust-covered construction vehicles before they return to public roadways also reduces the. effects of fugitive dust on air quality. 8 • APPENDIX F NOISE ANALYSIS e NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT September 14, 1984 The Arroyo Group Planners, Architects and Associated Disciplines 40 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91105 Noise Impact Assessment Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Environmental Noi se 1 evel s i n Hunti ngton Beach are determi ned pri- Setting marily by the level of vehicular traffic on immediately . adjacent streets and nearby freeways. Community noise levels are commonly expressed in decibels on a scale which averages noise levels over a 24-hour period and accounts by a weighting or penalty factor for the greater importance of noise intrusions at night. The two such noise measures in common use in California are the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) and Day-night level (L ). These two measures are numerically equivalent w Min 0.5 decibel (dB) for most .urban. traffic noise situations. Table 1 summarizes the significance of various community noise levels based on standards and guidelines of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Environ- mental Protection Agency and many other federal and state agencies. Environmental Noise impacts associated with the proposed project are Impact those that will occur solely during the construction period. This noise will arise primarily from construction vehicles. Most of the Talbert Gap Flood Control system adjoins single family residential neighborhoods. Residents in these dwelling units will be impacted by the noise from improvements to the system. The short term impact could be significant because of the high noise levels produced by large earthmoving equipment. Substantial grading can be involved. in large flood control projects. Large earthmoving equipment including trucks and tractors can produce peak noise levels as high as 90 to 95 dBA at 50 feet. These levels are sufficient to be of substantial annoyance to nearby residents, and would cause hearing damage to equipment operators without hearing protection. - Because construction impact is temporary, and because no feasible measures exist to reduce the peak level of equipment, annoyance can be reduced only by insuring that reasonable hours of operation be used by- contractors. Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) standards protect hearing of equipment operators. Mitigation Adverse impacts on existing residences in the vicinity Measures of the project. area are not considered feasible to eliminate because of the high cost and short-term nature of the noise resulting from the proposed project. 1 TABLE 1 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY NOISE LEVELS Noise Level CNEL. or. Ldn Interpretation below 55 Clearly Acceptable for residential development. The noise exposure is such that both the indoor and outdoor environments are pleasant to most people. (60 dB L is considered "Clearly Acceptable" by Huntington Beach General Plan noise standards.) 55-65 Normally Acceptable for residential development. The noise exposure is above the threshold of annoyance for many individuals. Noise exposure is great enough to be of some concern, but common building construction will make the indoor environment acceptable, even for sleeping quarters, and the outdoor environment will be reasonably pleasant for recreation and play. 65-75 Normally Unacceptable for residential development. California law requires additional sound insulation in multiple family residences. The noise exposure is sufficiently severe that unusual and costly building construction is necessary to insure quiet indoors, and barriers are needed between the site and noise source to make the outdoor environment acceptable. over 75 Clearly Unacceptable for residential development. The noise exposure at the site is so severe that the construction costs to make the indoor environment acceptable would be prohibitive in most cases and the outdoor environment would be intolerable. Source.: The Arroyo Group, interpretation of various noise standards and guidelines of Federal and State agencies. Construction activity by heavy equipment should be limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. to minimize annoyance in adjacent residential areas. This mitigation measure is not capable of reducing construction noise impact to an insignificant level ; but is considered the maximum feasible mitigation measure which permits construction activity to take place. 2 • APPENDIX G HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF FLOODING HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF FLOODING IN THE PROJECT AREA TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT September 14, 1984 The Arroyo Group Planners, Architects and Associated Disciplines 40 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91105 • 'TALBERT GAP REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT: FLOOD CONTROL IMPACTS HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF FLOODING IN PROJECT AREA The Santa Ana River Channel, which is located adjacent to the south-eastern boundary of the proposed project, has been prone to flooding hazards throughout recorded history: Severe winter storms have intermittently hit California causing flooding. Large volumes of water have been observed in the Santa'Ana River Channel for the years 1862, 1861i 1891, 1938, 1969, 1974, 1978, 1980, and 1983. Historically, the existing Santa Ana River Channel, it's smaller tributaries (creeks) and earthen flood control channels were adequate to handle the flows, and flooding was not recognized as a serious'probleih until the mid=1960's after the City of Huntington Beach had begun to urbanize rapidly: As rapid growth occurred, the City of Huntington Beach began to allow development in areas close to the Santa Ana River and other areas that were potentially prone to flooding (alluvial fans and tidal flats). Even .with all the development in flood-prone areas the City of Huntington Beach P P � Y � experienbed no significant flooding problems until the winter 1983 storm. There was a localized occurrence during the December 1974 storm, which produced excessive run=off and caused the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel to over in the vicinity of Newland and McFadden Avenues north of the project area in the City of Westminster: Heavy flows in local flood channels were also observed in the 1978 and 1980 winter storms: However, none of these events caused significant problems in Huntington Beach. The winter 1983 storm proved to be within the 100 year frequency range: This storm was an unusual convergence of high tides, high surf and several reoccurring rain storms one after the other. On March 1, 1983 an intense rail fall was localized on the central coastal plain, which includes the proposed project area. Due to the previous long period of rainfall the soil had reached its retention capacity and the new storm (March 1; 1983) produced a substantial run-off. The substantial run-off coupled with back flow into flood channels due to high tides caused the Huntington Beach, Talbert and Fountain Valley Flood Control channels to fail in several locations. The channel failures were caused by water flows in excess of channel capacity which • over-topped or breached the side of the levees. Once the channels were breached the water flooded out into the adjacent communities causing serious damage. The events I of the winter 1983 storm are an' indication of potential flooding problems that will reoccur on a more frequent basis in the future due to projected growth in the City of Huntington Beach. New developments would further reduce percolation areas and increase sheet flows which will add to the water flowing into the existing flood control channels during major storms. AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING All of the proposed project area exists within an area designated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as being subject to flooding during the 100-year and 500 year storm. Figure 1 shows the areas subject to flooding,.based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. (FIRM boundaries are established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency). Design criteria for developments within FIRM boundaries were established in 1973 and the project. area was initially identified to be within a flood zone (FIRM) in August 1974. A soil survey produced by the U.S. Soil Conservation service (1978) has also identified the project area as a region subject to flooding. The area is included in the Hueneme- • Bolsa Association (soil group). This soil association includes flood plains, alluvial fans, and tidal flats all of which are nearly level (0-2% slope), are somewhat poorly drained and have a moderate to high run off potential. As a result of the project area being located within a designated flood plain the majority of homes and businesses nearby are susceptible .to flooding in the event of flood control system failure. The existing flood control channels are mostly earthen channels that were.constructed in mid-1950's as an interim flood control measure. The intent at that time was to obtain rights-of-way and construct minimal facilities with the ultimate plan that earth channels would be enlarged and concrete lined in the future. Some of the water courses that were improved, do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the volume of flow that would be the accepted standard today. Many. drainage improvements were constructed for outdated runoff rates which have been modified to higher values in the last 10 to 15 years. The 1973 criteria calls for 100 year flood protection, whereas the earlier design criteria was based on achieving a 25- year level of protection. Some drainage facilities have also experienced greater flow rates because development upstream is now creating higher runoff rates than would have occurred for the development that they were originally designed for. Another condition that is reducing the capacity of some earth channels is a progressive reduction in the cross-section of the channels. The drainage facilities in the project area are.on very shallow slopes, so the water velocity is too slow to keep materials moving with the water, resulting in a gradual buildup of silt in the channel bottom. „ „ fir;••,:.:: • • <<:. �.: + '."�1,•: 1. rf f • APPENDIX H RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The review period for this Environmental Impact Report began on September 21, 1984 and closed on November 5 , 1984. • STATE OF CAI WORNIA--OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET A �CRAMENTO, CA 95814 November 6, 1984 I1r. Charles Clark City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190, 2000 Plain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: SCH# 84080808, Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project (EIR 84-5) Dear Mr. Clark: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and the com- ments of the individual agency(ies) is(are) attached. If you would like to discuss their concerns and recommendations, please contact the staff from the appropriate agency(ies) . - When preparing the final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132) . The certified EIR must be considered in the decision- making process for the project. In addition, we urge you to respond directly to the commnting agency(ies) by writing to them, including the State.Clearinghouse number on all correspondence. In the .event that the project is approved without adequate mitigation of significant effects, the lead agency must make written findings for each significant effect and it must support its actions with a written statement of overriding considerations for each unmitigated significant effect (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and 15093) . If the project requires discretionary approval from any state agency, the Notice of Determination must be filed with the Secretary for Resources, as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Mark Boehme at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions about the environmental review process. Sincerely, John B. Ghanian Chief Deputy Dir r E cc: Resources Agency HUNTINGTON BEACH attachment DEVELOPMENT SERVICES • NOV 13 1984 Huntington P.O.Beach, h, CA 92648 MURRAYSTORM DIRECTOR, EMA ROBERT G. FISHER 4 U NTY O P DIRECTOR OF PLANNING; 2 1 <: LOCATION: 12 CIV,IC CENTER PLAZA- , P.O. BOX 4646 5 3, RANGE SANTA ANA,CA 92702-4048 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY SANTA ANA, CA 9 2 7 02-4048 PLANNING TELEPHONE: (714)834.4643 October 29, 1984 FILE NCL #4045 HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Ms. Florence Webb OCT 3104 Senior Planner. City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main st P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington.Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Draft EIR Talbert Gap Flood Control Development Dear Ms. Webb: The Environmental Management Agency has reviewed the above referenced document • which analyzes the enivornmental impacts from proposed improvements to a system of flood control channels, and pump stations within the City of Huntington �-- Beach. The '!Talbert Gap'•• is that area of the Santa Ana River floodplain generally east of Beach Boulevard; south of Garfield Avenue, west of the Santa Ana River channel and north of the. Pacific Ocean. We have the following compents Air Quality 0 -The Environmental Setting section should be supplemented with the following: - The current state and federal air quality standards. A summary of the air quality trends at the closest monitoring station for the previous 3 years (1981, 1982, 1983), including the number of days the federal and state standards were exceeded in each year and the maximum recorded concentrations in the last year (1983). ° The EIR should include a quantitative estimate of emissions due to construction equipment and fugitive dust from grading and excavation operations. ° The following additional mitigation measures should be included in the EIR: - Maintaining construction equipment engines in proper tune. - Discontinuing construction during second stage smog alerts. Florence Webb Page 2 Circulation ° Although construction of the channel improvements will only create temporary traffic circulation impacts, these impacts can be mitigated by minimizing the movement of construction vehicles during the peak traffic periods. ° It will be necessary to coordinate with CalTrans. for the signing and channelization standards in road construction zones. . Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the DEIR. We continue to look forward to working with you on this project. We would appreciate receiving three copies of the EIR when they become available. If you have any questions, please contact me at 834-5550. Very truly yours, G.a Alex A. Ghobadi Environmental Analysis Division AAG:jkj(OC7) L RESPONSE TO- COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMMENTS DATED OCTOBER 29, 1984 1. The attached tables indicate the current state and federal air quality standards and a summary of the air quality trends at the .closest monitoring station. 2 . The exact quantities of fugitive dust and exhaust emissions emitted . during construction cannot be determined at this time, due to a lack of specific project information. 3. The need for maintaining construction equipment engines in proper tune is noted, as well as for discontinuing construction during second stage smog alerts. 4 . The need for minimizing construction vehicle movement during " peak traffic periods and for coordinating with CalTrans for the signing and channelization standards in road construction zones is noted. • NUMBER OF DAYS STATE A E AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WERE EXCEEDED 1981 CARBON NITROGEN SULFUR Monitor Station OZONE MONOXIDE DIOXIDE DIOXIDE TSP LEAD Long Beach 30 0 13 0 56. 0 Lynwood 41 29 5 0 40 3 Los Angeles 120 8 17 0 36 3 Pico Rivera 139 2 8 0 46 2 Whittier 90 4 11 0 NM NM La Habra 92 2 .8 0 37 0 Anaheim 65 3 4 0 26 0 Los Alamitos 37 NM NM 0 32 0 Costa Mesa 28 1 2 0 NM NM Pomona 137 0 5 NM NM NM Riverside 188 0 1 0 49 0 El Toro 49 0 NM NM 24 0 Notes: NM: Not measured at this station NR: Not reported by South Coast Air Quality Management District Ozone: Days Ozone equaled or .exceeded 0. 10. parts per million, 1-hour average. Carbon Monoxide: Days carbon monoxide equaled or exceeded 10 parts per million, 8-hour average, or 40 parts per million, 1-hour average. Nitrogen Dioxide: Days nitrogen dioxide equaled or exceeded 0 . 25 parts per million, 1-hour average. Sulfur Dioxide: Days sulfur dioxide equaled or exceeded 0. 50 parts per million, 1-hour average, or equaled or exceeded 0 . 0.5 parts per million, 24-hour average, with 1-hour ozone or higher or with 24-hour total suspended particulates 100 micrograms per cubic meter or higher. TSP: Days total suspended particulates exceeded 100 ug/cubic meter, 24-hour average. Lead: Months lead exceeded 1. 5 ug/cubic meter, monthly average. Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, "Air Quality and Meteorology" , Month of December, 1981. NUMBER OF DAYS FEDERAL AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WERE EXCEEDED 1981 CARBON SULFUR Monitor Station OZONE MONOXIDE DIOXIDE TSP LEAD Long Beach 13 3 NR 7 0 Lynwood 15 52 NR 10 0 . Los Angeles 74 16 NR 5 0 Pico Rivera 94 5 NR 12 0 Whittier 56 8 NR NM NM La Habra 60 8 NR 7 0 Anaheim 32 14 NR 7 0 Los Alamitos 13 NM NR 8 0 Costa Mesa 6 5 NR NM NM . Pomona 97 2 NR NM NM Riverside 127 0 NR 38 0 E1 Toro 18 0 NR 3 0 Notes• NM: Not measured at this station NR: Not reported by South Coast Air Quality Management District Ozone: Days Ozone exceeded 0. 12 parts per million, 1-hour average Carbon Monoxide: Days carbon monoxide exceeded 9 parts per . • million, 8-hour average ;.�. Sulfur Dioxide: Days Sulfur Dioxide exceeded 0 . 14 parts per million, 24-hour average. TSP: Days total suspended particulates exceeded 150 ug/cubic meter, 24-hour average. Lead: Quarters lead exceeded 1. 5 ug/cubic meter, quarterly average. Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, "Air Quality and Meteorology" , Month of December, 1981. i APPENDIX A AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS CALIFORNIA AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION I DISTRICT METHOD Ozone 0.10 Rpm, 1-hr. avg. M. Photo metr 0.12 m 1-hr. avg. 0.12 m 1-hr. avg. Chemiluminescent ppm, - r. avg, n-dtsperstve n ra- ppm, - r. avg. 9 ppm, 8-hr. avg. on-dtsperstve n ra-red Carbon Monoxide 20 ppm, 1-hr. avg. red S ectro hotometr 35 m 1-hr, avg. 35 ppm, 1-hr. avg. S ectro hotometr Gas Phase Gas Phase Nitro en Dioxide 0.25 ppm, 1-hr. avg. Chemi lumi nescence 0.05 Rpm, annual av . 0.05 ppm,_annual avg. Chemiluminesc.ence ppm, - r. avg. with Ozone > U.10 p m, 1-hr.avg. or 0.03 ppm, annual avg. Sulfur Dioxide TSP > TOO ug/m�, 24-hr. avg. Pulsed.Fluorescence 0.14 ppm, 24-hr. avg. 0.5 ppm, 3-hr. avg. Para-rosaniline U.5 ppm, 1-hr. avg. 75 ug , annual ug , annua a � Total Suspended geometric mean geometri mean High Vol. Sampling Particulate TSP 260 u /m3 24-hr. av 150 u m 24-hr.av . Suspended 30 ug , annual geometric mean Particulate Matter PM 10 50 u /m3 24-hour average High Vol. amp ing Sulfates 25 u /m3 24-hr. avg. Meth 1-th mol Blue -7fgTVol. Sampling High Vol. Sampling 1.5 ug/m3, calendar 1.5 ug/m3, calendar Atomic absorption . Lead 1.5 u /m3 30-dayavg. x-ray fluorescence suarter quarter S ectro hotometr Cadmium y rox e H dro en Sulfide 0.03 ppm, 1-hr. avg. Stractan - - Vinyl Chloride 0.010 ppm, 24-hr. avg. Gas Chromatography - - ppm, 8-hr. avg. Ethylene 0.5U eem, I-hr: av _rn-sufticient amount to reduce the prevailing visibility to - - - .Visibility less than 10 miles at relative Reducing Particles humidity less than 7 1 ob a)Reference method as described by the federal government. An equivalent method of.measurement may used as approved by the federal government. . *Effective December 15, 1982. The standards '.+ere previously 10 ppm, 12-hour average and 40 ppm, 1-hour average. MURRAY STORM DIRECTOR,EMA ROBERT G.FISHER 4 um TY O F DIRECTOR OF.PLANNING . 2 ) LOCATION:12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA P.O. BOX 4048 S 3 RAN G E SANTA ANA,CA 92702-4048 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 4048 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY SANTA ANA,CA 92702-4048 PLANNING TELEPHONE: (714)834-4643 November 6, 1984 FILE NCL #4045 Ms. Florence Webb Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Draft EIR 84-5 Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Group Flood Control System Dear Ms. Webb: Reference to our telephone conversation on November 5, 1984, please add the attached comments. received from our Design to our original comments forwarded to you on October 27, 1984. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly "yours, Alex A. Ghobadi Environmental Analysis Division AAG:am Attachment 610" BEACH V4%3KTI t4 EN.T SERVICES I EVE pOd 9 V.o.BOX 190 92648 • H�nttngto g�Cb� e of Oran � � N011 2 1984 County g TO: F. W. Olson, Manager EMA, Environmental Analysis Division FROM: J. W. Williams, Manager EMA/Public Works-Design SUBJECT: Draft EIR 84-5 Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Group Flood Control System Thank you for-- the opportunity to review and comment on the subject draft EIR. We have the following comments: 1. Page 1, Section 1.1: The third paragraph, last sentence states, "The City's adopted General Plan contains policies for maintaining the improving flood control in the City." Does this mean the City intends to take over the improved channels for maintenance and operation? 2. Page 4, under County Pump Station lists, Adams P.S. : EMA's pump station at DO1 and Adams Avenue is named the Huntington Beach Pump Station. 3. Figure 3 does not show a separate ocean outlet for Talbert Channel. 4. Page 6, paragraph 2 states: "The proposed improvements to the flood control channels involve improving flow and capacity within existing right of way." All alternatives outletting near the Santa Ana River mouth will require additional right of way from the Pacific Ocean to the DO1/D02 confluence. The alternatives with the Brookhurst Street outlet will require additional right of way adjacent to Brookhurst Street. 5. Page 6, paragraph 2, the last sentence states.: "The ocean oultet, though not actually within the project boundaries, will be at the Santa Ana River mouth." DO1, D02 and D05 are backwater channels with very flat slopes, and unless the ocean outlet is also improved it could cause a choked condition, whereby some unimproved reaches of channel could be in danger of overtopping. '-850-188(3/84) cft F. W. Olson, Manager Page 2 6. Page 6, paragraph 3 states in part: ". . . will require an expansion of the existing County pump station on Adams Avenue and " A reason for the above statment is not given. We know of no reason why that expansion would be.required, however, an additional new pump station, north of Adams Avenue will be required to pump water into the proposed Bartlett Park Retarding Basin. 7. Page 13, paragraph 4, the last two lines: A 100-year storm is a rain event and may or may not produce a 100-year flood event, primarily depending on anticedent moisture conditions. Th:. flood re- currence interval is the average interval of time within which the given flood will be equaled or exceeded once. 8. Page 13, last sentence: Local and general storms are defined in the present Orange County Flood Con- trol District Hydrology Manual as follows: The local 100-year storm .uses the time distribution of rainfall for the . December 1933 - Janaury 1934 storm and the 24-hour 100-year point rainfall to determine the rainfall time pattern. 9. The flood zones shown in Figure 10 will not be changed as a result of the proposed project. 10. Page 17, last sentence should read: In response to this flooding, the Orange County Flood Control District . 11. None of the facilities are County facilities. The following are Orange County Flood Control District facilities; D01PS1, DO1PO5 and D01P06 from Delaware Street to the pump station. 12. Page 20: Fountain Valley Channel (D05) from Talbert Channel (D02) to Garfield Avenue is under construction with rectangular wall reinforced concrete lining. The project is nearing completion. 13. The recommended design discharges in Figure 11 have been slightly revised. It is suggested that the corrected discharges be obtained from Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates as shown in Figure 11. 14. Page 22, paragraph 4 states: "The construction of a cofferdam to control the tidal backwater and a system I F. W. Olson, Manager Page 3 of trenches that are deeper than the design inverts from which the groundwater would be pumped will be required to control groundwater and tidal backwater." The above statement needs further explanation as to exactly what this work would accomplish and at what cost. ,J_ Keith & Associates prepared a study .dated June 1984 for EMA entitled, "Tide Barriers and Pump Station Feasibility Study on Talbert Channel (D02) ." The conclusion of the study was that the total costs would have exceeded those for channel improvements. 15. Page 32, the first and second paragraphs discussing Alternatives D & E fail to point out that these alternatives would require a retarding basin (Site 1) in Reach 10, just south of Ellis Avenue. 16. Page 32, the last paragraph at the bottom of the page, prompts several comments. "Moving the ocean outlet would divide up the beach ." The Brookhurst Street-D02 outlet would move the ocean. outlet approximately 2,600' upcoast. 'Selection of Alternative F would allow the ocean outlet to remain in its existing location " This is not accurate! The existing outlet adjacent to the Santa Ana River has to be relocated to the north when the river outlet is improved. In addition, the D02 outlet needs widening also. Alternative. "F" will have a higher total cost of approximately $8,000,000 than Alternative "C". Alternative "F" will also require approximately 3,000 feet more of concrete lining of the channel (D02) bottom than Alternative "C". The enclosed comparison of ocean outlet alternatives may be helpful. (Please see attached) . 17. Page 32, on alternatives: Another alternative, that of moving the river and D02 outlets downcoast also needs to be discussed. This alternative however, would require the realign- ment of the river to the east, severely impacting the degraded wetlands east of the river and would require the removal of approximately 8 multi-family homes. 18. On Page 35 it appears that Orange County EMA was not consulted. i J. W. Williams; Manager EMA/Design Division = RDR:cs Enclosure: Comparison of Ocean Outlet Alternative i COMPARISON OF' OCEAN OUTLET ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED BROOKHURST STREET OUTLET Advantages Disadvantages 1. Abandoned right of way of Tal- 1. Taking and severance of a portion bert Channel at the existing of Huntington Beach State Park. Santa Ana Ocean outlet would be available for SAR. 2. Relocation of a portion of the 2. Construction of a new bridge at Least Tern (endangered species) Pacific Coast Highway over the nesting area would not be re- proposed Talbert Channel Outlet. quired. 3. Additional right of way for 3. Channel outlet is relocated, widening of Talbert Channel partially isolating dowi►coast along the degraded wetlands beach from upcoast beach (parking between the Santa Ana River lot would retain continuity over Outlet and Brookhurst Street Channel). would not be required. 4. Construction of a new Brookhurst 4. Disruption of Park plans. Street bridge at the Talbert Channel would not be required. 5. The shorter Talbert Channel makes 5. Possible impacts on littoral sand reductions in upstream channel movement and ability to maintain width, . and reduction in the tidal -flow in Talbert Channels. amount of concrete lining (3000't) of the bottom possible. 'I'he longer reach of soft bottom channel is environmentally more desirable. 6. A total cost savings of approxi- mately $8,000,000 on the total project as compared to a project with .the outlet near the Santa Ana River mouth. 7. Abandoned right o.f way of Talbert Channel, between Santa Ana River mouth and Brookhurst Street could be restored to wetlands. UP.COAST OUTLET NEAR EXISTING SANTA ANA RIVER MOUTH Advontages Disadvantages 1. No severance of a portion of 1. Longcr bridge at Pacific Coast Huntington Beach State Park Highway to span the river and the new Talbert Channel outlet. v 2. Lower cost than downcoast out- 2. Additional right-of-way required let. to be acquired. from State Parks to relocate channel upcoast of sewer outfall (but beach frontage still usable within channel mouth and widened Santa Ana River mouth) . 3. Portion of the least tern nesting _r area would require relocation. 4. Additional right of way required to widen Talbert Channel between the Santa Ana River and the Huntington Beach Channel-Talbert Channel confluence. 5. Longer bridge at Brookhurst Street. 6: Increase of channel bottom concrete lining of approximately 3,000 feet on Talbert Channel downstream of Adams Avenue. 7. Increased cost of approximately $8,000,000 on the total project as compared to a project with the outlet near Brookhurst Street. MOVE SANTA ANA RIVER OUTLET DOWNCOAST Advar:tcrges Disadvantages 1 . No taking or severance of a 1. Longer bridge at Brookhurst portion of Huntington Beach Street. State Park. 2. Relocation of a portion of least 2. Increase of channel bottom tern nesting area not required. concrete lining of approximately 3,000 feet (as compared with Brookhurst Street Outlet). 3. Acquisition of about eight (8) multi-family homes and cost of relocation assistance to the affected families. • 4. Loss of proposed mitigation area by Corps of Engineers due to acquistion of additional right of way to the east of the existing Santa Ana:`River through the degraded wetlands area. 5. Relocation of 78" RCP sewer line • now crossing Talbert Channel near existing Santa Ana River mouth. 6. Increased cost of upstream chan- nel construction and additional right of way ($8,000,000t). Does not include costs for Santa Ana River relocation or costs for items 4 and 5 above. 7. Not implementable until after the Santa Ana River has been' relocated by the Corps of Engineers. or requires relocation of the river as part of the Talbert Valley project at an additional cost roughly approximated at $15,000,000 to $26,000,000. 8. Substantial delay in Caltrans project to widen Pacific Coast Highway. V ' RESPONSES .TO COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The City does not propose, to- take over maintenance 'and operation of the improved channels. 2 . I The correction in . the =name of the Huntington` Beach pump station has been duly noted. . 3 . Figure 3 is intended to be a general depiction of the flood control system and doe.s .not show the detail of the separate ocean outlet. 4� The City. of Huntington Beach EIR does not ide'ntif'y the need for additional right-of-way along any of the flood control channels. If the County of Orange proposes- additi-onal right-of-way, their EIR should address the issues related to the need. 5 . The City of Huntington 'Beach EIR does not address the Santa Ana River mouth because it is not within the boundaries of the proposed redevelopment area. It is likely that improvements will need to be made to the river mouth. 6. The .wording "expansion of the existing County pump station. . . was intended .to include the possibility of construction of a new pump station in the general vicinity. 7 . The clarification of the definition of a 100-year storm is noted . 8 . The definition is noted. 9. It is correct that- the flood zones shown in Figure 10 will not. be changed as a result of the proposed project. 10. Correction noted. 11. All facilities refered to as County facilities should be refered to as Orange County Flood Control District facilities . 12 . Comment noted. 13 . The corrected discharges are attached . 14 . The necessary studies will be completed prior to construction of the project. 15. Alternatives. D and E would include retarding basins in Reach 10 just south of Ellis Avenue. 16. Selection of Alternative F would allow the ocean outlet to remain in the same general vicinity rather than being moved 2 , 600 feet up coast. The City has not been provided with a detailed break down of the cost. components of Alternatives' C and F. The City ieould withhold agreement with the $8 , 000, 000 difference until such a breakdown is provided. 17 . This alternative would be outside the proposed redevelopment area. The City would not be willing to even analyze an alternative that would consider the removal of. homes and possible acquisition . of privately owned. property. 18 . Orange County EMA will be added to the list of those consulted. i oT- vtiJ 430 Cis ,o a 520ac si _ `. vim.• -- _ SS a" i 7 .inr `o 720 cfs e('�S 1.7-' ° e _ P) •(tp �\ \.. 726'aC n n' 72a�Ps FOUNTAIN i%ALLE ' ei �:.;:'•'•� ; o e w N [e oo to _ • s 0 3 I i- I I_ t l; 4, r. _ •I, 890 ac f:. .,... w of cn w rt -�. i• s' U Q � i. „! �_r " �t•I 1• , r k 1 W 0 Q[C7 b1 0 ♦ �; !ti. £-- " 0 7 r..•r I L .. ® �) , i vun rrz r. ,.I4,. ro n m'n o n ��.q S �• Y r r4 i •^�-,�� fi f I �... lj i 805cf4 ` 1270Cfs ,� 11 r.:� 6 r✓ ,_,../-r- _ �2 4sta.sL� i•✓;: .._ ` ' Il�''.�: 1 " :/s':, .-°m .-•'� 920 cPs � _ :� l.__• 1 i i, mu H..... II__ 1170 ac F i i [ ���pp P 1492 •, !r. ,w • ' ,�% ...' I. I •" -,m� 1' SO: .IR _�° 1 - 't_ Walnut P.S. o 1050 cfs S :I n. I ,.,�.. N f; 9' 1 °""• ae. 1 +'� 1� r � :A �{ ana�nr•? II L... •� 1550 cfs d>I: 6 j ! I e I i g , 143G ac I 1808 ac d /O �Se - -,. '_._oNtr4Q..m - - - - - - -- 3"1C(1A1� :d� 1L611 1..f vl a F•• , ,l �t ti.'( lnclmans•:" I. a�1070 cff �K�! :.` 1700 cfs _ Z S j - q - Jf� •y. vi- •. �.P`.'r t... . Z.,. : I t ,3 6 1 .• e�• a I Q, 8 • /I •" ins - A w 0i6 Harper ry J li 1445 ac 2 aC , Ha r Vail Cha :r,4 I 2300 c s2 - p•. �- i -f:`v t. la artlet4 .1:ark ,a �3940 8� .town For town P.S L Z o 1` r 1 d T ', j \-�•. / Yc I Y f'[ �Ir '1 1 )•• �t z��l r/r - �I 1EH LA/'s.° , , f _ P. O, 2460 Ct4 { 11r a• J i f !� •.11-. 4180 ac 7 IOp9 A 0[ pa -1 s: t. , , y A 1 r j -i '+,�{,\\ ._..w,' •! ' DO1 P06 _!e Adams P.S - I .,= 1550 cfs ,• �,'� y 1422 ac t -- 1_. Fi, ' I a; T�1. `' : _COSTA MESA D61PO4 1-, HUNTINGTON 16z0 cfs 'B.EACH 'a 3150 cf: ® ' .1i� e••� i_.. .. 1490 ae '[ -' 4720 ae. .,. _�- iil Indianapolis P.S. u • I -�J6 Ili �:. .. � _ �r'[� _r"'. �c.. ._„ 1!1 �'�/ .�� i _ C ' eclAr l / 111UNTIN. I ' .. ... _.' .. r Atlanta P.S. r- - !!! rr 2230-CfS I 4. G. t®.__ ...._. ..oa."' ,® /'/ / +f!,�__.._„_...., a•'n e �—. « . , a N-r Cd o•- e G t I E .4� f._...a-r_ �. J P 7 Banning P.S. ', .4 . `6 r'o 6(; 3695 Cfs :Ar e� ,`�i �"- ® ..- a_ca•,•[s i -. i ry�� C 5510 ac O'er/ "' ., m e - '1,:% '° ;•=�1__�__.._`''.... P -,�� ,�1•A .. ; _I _� 8 may.•rw :rt-i. B' '�li•::oeo - - `. ,; �` •.•♦.E9 i' - �:, icy, •, � ,o _ TALBERI• VALLEY CHANNELS - c f f 1 �._f.rt , FACILITY NOS. DO1, D02 & D05 ` - " _ �� � t - t• '�'1'-- �,� t ALTERNATIVE C ,, - ` - `i,<�_' i �I,�� - r■. ' Recommended Design Discharges 19 e Iq 0 - 3000' �1aGctYcl3ctr[.`liillramcl'iastQEc�Ycvrfirtc ` 1N 22253 Exhibit R State of California, George Deukmejian, Governor California Coastal Commission , 631 Howard Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 543-8555 November 51 1984 Ms. Christine Goggin State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: SCH # 84080808, Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Dear Ms. Goggin: The Commission staff has reviewed the above-referenced EIR. Thank you for the additional time granted to us for review. The staff's review indicates that most of our comments made in connection with the County of Orange's proposed flood control project ( DEIR No. 445) on these channels were not considered in this DEIR. Therefore, we are enclosing a copy of our prior comments. In addition, we would also like to note the following additional comments: First, the DEIR does not clearly indicate how the construction will occur. It is stated that the modifications will all take place within the existing right of gray, yet Figure 5 shows modifications to the outer levee banks on all alternatives which stay result in filling of adjacent wetlands, and which may be inconsistent with provisions of the Coastal Act. Second, pages 20 and 22 of the DEIR propose . dewatering activities. The FIR should evaluate whether these dewatering activities will have any adverse effects on''adjacent wetlands. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this document. Very y Yours, Ro6grt B. Lade ' Assistant Deputy Director for Land Use attachment cc: Charles Clark, City of Huntington Beach Ken Fellows, DWR M ASS �t C.=.Gtoiv:a,George Dei:kmejian, Coverrmr <:alJor-iia Coastal C,c,m nli-;sicto r. I i low„rd Stivot, •-.th I blur i franciscu,Californw 94 !05 : -Aily 24, 1984 PcbE:rt P. kisby (--,r::nzge County Envirorn.antal Yanaguni-nt Pgercy P. O. Box 4048 Santa lna, CA 94702-4048 EIR No. 445 - 'l'altx-.rt alley Flood Control Channel System D:�:Lr Mr. P.>.trs.y: 'i .o a!xove-mentioned project is located within 2 area subject to Coastal Commission jurl sdiction. The EIR for. tkais project should therefore deteanf.ne the project's con- sistency with the following laws, adopted and proposed plans, and on-going planning efforts: QzlifOrn:ia Coastal Act, City of Huntington Beach Land Use Plan, City of Huntington Beach ZonLig 1WRvientation, Coastal Commission Findings on City of Fluntingt-:r D%)lerrentation, Orange County Santa Ana River mouth draft Land Use Plan, Coastal O=nissi orjrction to Consistency Det,_z� ation M. M-13-81 (U.S. Army Corps, Santa Ana River) S tza to Ir�:,3.rtmc:nt of Fish and Grow Determination of the Status of the Huntington Beach TV -.t &.ds. In reviewing these dcx�nts and the impact:.s of the proposed project, particular attent-I should be focused on impacts on (and policies g verni.ng) envirorm entally sensitive .^r3bi ar,�a.s (particularly «Hands and least tern habitat) , public access and recreation (.inc.i.c rrr traffic) , and effects on coastal waters and littoral processes. Section 30233 of t;�= cb st al Act discusses wetland protection, including einmi2ration of the limiter. allawabl : uses in wetlands, and they_circarnstances under which such uses.may occur. As can be: sera. fran this section, as well as the Cenission's action on the Huntington Beach Iiltplementat (atrpted July 10-13, 1984, see p. 37) , flood control projects are allouixl "Only in Con- ju::c{:1.on wit}l restoration plar>�....r,�r, e necessary for public safety and to protect axis;:., develoLpie.nt where there is no other feasible mathod for protecting structures in the fl plain. " The Cornnission's action on the Corps' Consistency Det urination for the Santa. Pdver .flex-d control project zeflectc d the stern concern. Section '0233 of the Ccantal 7. ct also discusses the taming aril irermer of draCiging am! s as wrll as material r,3T,,veci fr= flood conies-Ol f.acilicies (see SeCt:�ors 30233;t and (d) ). . Sections 30235 and 30236 discuss alteration of s1horeline process, coastal .„rt.-r and streams and rivers. Syc:t. ..�ns 30240, 30230 and 304"Z31 require protection of coastal waters aril .e.nsiti.vo habitat arras. Sections 30210-30'221 require prot_rc:.::.-, of public access and retreat-;.on opportuni ties. 1984 i s 1 3 -y - � (r:Alt` .sH• d - V RESPONSE TO CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION COMMENTS As stated in DEIR 84- 5 , the City of Huntington Beach addresses. modifications only to the interior of the channel and the top of the berm as shown in Figure 5 . Both modifications are completely within the existing right-of way. The modifications to the top of the existing .berm will not impact adjacent wetlands . Dewatering activities prior to commencement of construction in the channels will have a temporary and minor effect on the adjacent wetlands . If it is anticipated that large amounts of water will be pumped into surrounding wetlands , temporary floodgates should . be installed to allow the water to drain off through the channel downstream, avoiding inundation of the wetlands . Dewatering and construction activities will impact the habitat of the channel temporarily but most plants are annual marshland species and will regenerate in one .season. The impact is minimal and will not greatly affect wildlife feeding grounds on a regional scale . However, the County of Orange is the lead/responsible. agency on the Talbert Gap Flood Control Project because the channels are owned and maintained by the County. Therefore., the County must comply with coastal regulations and policies and will address concerns of the Coastal Commission in the upcoming County Project EIR. The City of Huntington Beach is merely proposing to financially assist the County with providing needed improvements to the channels . State of Califwnia The Resources Agency Memorandum • . 1 . Projects_ Coordinator October 30 , 1984 Resources Agency 2. City of Huntington Beach Department 'of Development Services P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 From Department of Fish and Game subiect: Draft EIR on the Proposed Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project, Orange County - SCH 84080808 We have reviewed the Draft EIR for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment 'Project that involves increasing the flood control capacity of three• existing flood control channels in Huntington Beach by widening. and lining the channels and creating retention basins. The purpose of the .redevelopment project is to assist the County of Orange in providing improvements to the Talbert Gap flood control .system by rehabilitation of existing channels, storm drain, and pump stations. Department personnel familiar with the project area believe that the description of the biotic resources within and adjacent to the project area are inadequate. The DEIR lacks the description of habitats that we requested when responding to the Notice of Preparation. Furthermore, the description of the project does .not clearly describe .the modifications proposed for the existing channels. Figure 5, page . 8, appears to indicate that the toe-to-toe width of the "typical" channel section will be. increased; however, the exact width is not specified. Even though widening would occur within the existing right-of-way, some wetlands in Reaches 1-3 may be adversely affected. For us to. assess these impacts, a qualitative and quantitative assessment of plant communities between " the right-of-way and the existing toe should be described as recommended in our response to the Notice of Preparation and channel design specifications should be provided. All of the proposed alternatives include partly-lined trapezoidal channels in Reach 1 , and the two preferred alternatives include a lined trapezoidal channel in Reach 3 . If the channels are to be lined at all , we prefer vertical wall, soft bottom channels in Reaches 1-3. The DEIR does not provide substantive proof that .bottom sediments .will reform and be recolonized by benthic infauna. We believe the Upper Newport Bay study cited in the EIR is not comparable because , according to our knowledge, these channels are not fully concrete-lined. Furthermore , it seems to us that annual scouring .from flood flows and maintenance activities will reduce a perennial resource to a aangl one. D J� M �U ++ l rJ n 1 1 D ) 1984 to -2- Thus lining the channels with concrete will have a permanent . adverse effect on existing biotic resources, and damages to, and loss of, these resources should be mitigated. We fully support the proposed mitigation measures to return tidal waters to the wetlands adjacent to Reaches 1-3. This measure should be included as a part of the project because lining the channels with concrete will permanently reduce the existing fish and wildlife resources. Wetland restoration should provide an area fully equivalent, in fish and wildlife resources, to the total wetland area to be lined with concrete and covered by channel widening. As mentioned in our response to the Notice of Preparation, diversion of the natural flow or changes in the channel, bed, or banks of any river, stream, or lake will require notification- to the Department of Fish and Game as called for in Section 1601 of the - Fish and Game Code. This notification (with fee) and the subsequent agreement must be completed prior to initiating any such changes. Notification should be made after the project is. approved by the lead agency. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Fred A. , Worthley Jr. , Regional Manager of Region 5, at 245 W. Broadway, Suite 350, Long Beach, CA 90802; telephone number ( 213 ) 590-5113. ack C. Parnell I Director. • RESPONSE TO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME COMMENTS The City of Huntington Beach' s draft Talbert Gap Environmental Impact Report addresses the concept of a Flood Control Project to be designed and constructed by other agencies. The City EIR addresses the project as it applies to the creation of a Redevelopment Area to provide funding assistance for the project. The precise design and alignment of flood control improvements is to be .determined with more particularity by the County of Orange (the lead agency) prior to commencing any construction of such facilities. Staff believes that impacts on biological resources as addressed in Section 10. 0 D of the draft Environmental Impact Report is adequate. Any impact upon nearby biological resources will be revaluated by the County prior to commencement of construction. Stag of California The Resources Agency Memorandum Tst 1. Gordon F. Snow, Ph.D. Date : ACT 0 S 04 Assistant Secretary for Resources 2. City of Huntington Beach Rle No.: Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelop- Attention: Charles Clark went Project (EIR 84-5) From : Department of Water Resources SCH 84080808. Los Angeles, CA 90055 The Department of Water Resources has reviewed the subject report and offers the following comments: . 1. If levees are proposed to be constructed for new project channels or that existing- channels required raising of levees, they should conform to the Federal Emergency Management Agency's interim levee policy. 2. The examination of non-structural measures should be given serious consideration in solving local flooding problems. 3. The .City should be commended for its planned mitigation measure to prevent soil erosion by planting exposed berms on the retardation baiin with grass. • Implementation of this measure would render the proposed site aesthetically more pleasing. For further information, you may wish to contact John Pariewski at 213-620-3951. Sincerely, Robert Y. D. Chun,, Chief Planning Branch Southern District A D State C •- 1984 Ze�,���house RESPONSES TO DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES COMMENTS 1. The County should design the channels in conformance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency' s interim levee policy. 2. The items which have been considered are those items identified by Robert Bein, William Frost & . Associates, the County of Orange EMA and the City of Huntington Beach. Orange CountyVector Control District DISTRICT OFFICE • 13001 GARDEN GROVE BLVD.,GARDEN GROVE,CA 92643 MAILING ADDRESS • P.O.SOX$7,SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92M PHONE(AREA CODE 714)071.4421 0 BOARD OF TRUSTEES•1984 PRESIDENT-WILLIAM BANDARUK November 7, 1984HUNTINGTO14 BEACH VICE-PRESIDENT-JAROLD B.COLE SECRETARY-FRANCES R.WOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICE ANAHEIM JUDIE DE PERRY BREA Nov 13 198 DEAN F.MILLEN BUENA PARK Florence Webb, Senior Planner KENNETH B.JONES COSTA MESA City of Huntington Beach qnn WILLIAM BANDARUK P.O. Box CYPRESS 2000 Main Street ton Beach, CA 92648 FOUNTAIN VALLEY Huntington Beach, California 92648 Hunting MARVIN P.ADLER FULLERTON RE: . Huntington Center Commercial District FRANS R. GARDEN GROVE ° and Talbert Gap Flood Control , J.TILMANWILL.IAMS - - Redevelopment Project Areas - HUNTINGTON.BEACH WARREN G.HALL IRVINE Dear Ms. Webb: MARY ANN GAIDO LAGUNA BEACH LAMICHAEL HABRAE.MANG I. have reviewed the Huntington Center Commercial District and I DOROTHYWEDEL do not anticipate any significant vector problems. If dwellings LA PALMA DANIEL D.COLLINS or properties are suspected to contain rodents, then our agency LOS ALAMITOS PAULBERNAL should be notified at least two weeks prior to demolition or grading. NERWPORTBPEACH This will allow our technicians time to inspect or place rodenticide ORANGE bait prior to demolition and thus reduce the potential of rodent FRED L.BARRERA PLAC.ENTIA dispersal . ROBERT W.KUZNIK SAN CLEMENTE DR.WADELOWER In addition, sites should be graded to allow proper runoff and SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO JAROLDB.COLE avoid standing water that could breed mosquitoes:. Also, trash SANTA ANA WILLIAM L.BOYNTON should be held in fly proof containers and emptied biweekly. SEAL BEACH WILLEMKE VANDERSTAAY STANTON During the landscape phase of the project, plants that are attractive FRANK MARSHOTT 9 y p TUSTIN to rodents such as Algerian i , oleander,.v aim trees, bougainvillea, URSULA E. VILLAPARKKENNEDr etc. should be avoided. A list of alternate ground cover is enclosed. MARTIE STEVENSON WESTMINSTER KATHY BUCHOZ On the Talbert Gap Flood Control project, the improved flow and Y DAB D W.CD OMWELL capacity of the flood channels will be a benefit to our District's COUNTY OF ORANGE mosquito control efforts. However, the use of retarding basins LEO F.KOHL q 9 DISTRICT MANAGER to retain excess water until channel flows are reduced could increase GILBERT L.CHALLET the production of aquatic midges (a gnat-like insect that .does not bite or transmit disease but can reproduce in large numbers to create a nuisance) if the water is held longer than two weeks. Thank you for allowing our District to review .these projects. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact us. C,E CpIJ, r O Sincerely, 0 .0 y°r Gary Reynolds 4 p� Fisheries Biologist "OnTRo�, GR/vb Enc. cc: Lisa Ceran, Huntington Beach Plabnnin . A vector is any Insect or other arthropod,rodent or other animal of public hea h significance capable of causing human discomfort,Injury,or capable of harboring or transmitting the causative agent of human disease. Orange County Vector Control District A id Aquatic Midges CHIRONOMIDAE GENERAL INFORMATION . 1 Residents near open fresh water situa- tions, such as ponds, lakes, flood �.. channels, etc. are sometimes annoyed by swarms of mosquito-like insects called midges. Chironomid midges do resemble mpsqui- ECONOMIC AND MEDICAL IMPORTANCEtoes but- there are several easily seen characteristics that set them apart. These insects look and sound like mos- The midge is usually smaller than the quitoes but they cannot bite and, there- mosquito. Midges do not have a probos- fore, are not harmful to public health. cis with which to bite as mosquitoes do. Because midges reproduce in very large The body (abdomen) of the midge is numbers, they can be a public nuisance. longer than the wings, whereas, in They swarm about buildings, covering mosquitoes the wings are longer than the walls and windows and can get into a body. Mosquitoes sometimes have stripes person's eyes, nose and mouth. At times on their legs and abdomen and midges they have caused economic loss by do not. ruining freshly painted surfaces. LIFE CYCLE CONTROL METHODS The adult female midges lay their jelly- like egg masses in water and each egg Control of midge larva is much more mass can have from 10 to 1,000 eggs, difficult than the control of mosquito "depending on the species of midge. Each larva because the midge larva lives in egg will subsequently hatch into a larva the bottom mud and is much less vulner- which burrows into the mud or available able to our mosquito insecticides as substrate. The midge larvae feed on well as to mosquito fish. Satisfactory suspended matter in the water and organic control currently depends on continuing matter in the mud. Each larvae will go studies and research on new insecticide through several stages of development, formulations and biological controls. getting larger each time and subsequently Temporary relief can be achieved by molt into a pupa. The pupal stage lasts washing down walls, doorways, etc. with for a very short time and from the pupa water from a garden hose with a high emerges the adult. The length of time pressure nozzle. Space sprays from between egg laying and adult emergence aerosol cans are of little or no use. is about two weeks depending on the temperature. Adult midges live for 72 hours or less but this depends on the species and sex. Some midges can live for several weeks. These insects are usually bothersome only during the months of April through September. RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT COMMENTS The possibility of an increase in production of aquatic midges in retarding basins where water is held in excess of two weeks is noted. Measures to eliminate this problem will be pursued. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY .SCHOOL- DISTRICT 20451 Craimer Lane • P.O.Box 71 Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)964-8888 September 27, 1984 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Sherry Barlow President Florence Webb, Senior Planner Office of Redevelopment Pat Cohen City of Huntington Beach Clark 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Brian Garland .Member Re: EIR 84-4 and .EIR 84-5 Karen O•BriC Member Dear Ms. Webb Gary Nelson,D.D.S. The Huntington Beach City School District wants the proposed .Redevelop- Member ment Plan for. the Talbert Gap flood control system to improve the safe- ty of the students, staff and property of. the district. Many.of the schools in the district are in or .very near the redevelopment area.. It is imperative that the redevelopment plan specifically address the ADMINISTRATION safety of students during construction and after completion of the project.. Asian example, there is now a pedestrian bridge across the Distrrictict Superintenddeentnt 9"... Kemper, Talbert Channel that Provides access. to one of our .schools. This bridge is frequently a safety hazard for. our students. Will. the re- Ronald Brown development plan address safety problems such as this? . Two years ago, Assistant two of-our schools were evacuated because of. flooding.. Will the re- Superintendent development plan provide improved Personnel p P P P protection under similar conditions? Please make sure these concerns are included in the final EIR. Gary Burgner Ed.D. Assistant If the proposed redevelopment plan improves the safety provided student, Superintendent staff and property, the Huntington Beach City School District will be Business Services able .to support the plan. . I am confident it will. If you want more Diana Peters Ed.D. -information please call me at 964-8888. Assistant Superintendent Sincerely, Educational Services GARY A. RGNER, Ed.D. HUNTINGTON BEACH Assistant Superintendent. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Business Services : OCT 0 . GAB/mat , P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 190 . CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION (714)536-5241 PLANNING DIVISION(714)536-5271 November 6 , 1984 Dr . Gary A. Burgner . ' Huntington Beach City School District 20451 Craimer Lane P.O. Box 71 Huntington .Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr . Burgners This is in response to your letter regarding the Talber.t .Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project. You expressed concern that the project should address flooding which has occurred at two of your schools and that repairs be made to a,-pedestrian. bridge over the Talbert Channel. for Eader School . The -intent. of the Flood Control Project is- to make needed improvements to the channels , pump stations and storm drains in the Talbert Gap area . The improvements will increase the capacity of the- flood control system so that can safely convey the .water from a 100=year storm. Flooding of . local schools , • homes and businesses from overflow or failure of the channels and flood control -facilities will be eliminated by completion of the project. Although . the project is intended to focus primarily upon flood control facilities , some ancillary facilities may also be upgraded. There are several bridges which are scheduled for improvement. The Eader School pedestrian bridge is not specifically identified as being- .scheduled for improvement; however , we have made your concerns with the bridge known to the Orange County Environmental Management Agency design staff who are designing the flood control improvements . They have indicated that lining of the channel may necessitate reconstruction of the bridge.. We have also forwarded your concerns on maintenance of the existing bridge and fencing to the operations manager of EMA: In .regard to your more recent concern about constructio►i safety, we. have indicated the need for mitigation of temporary safety. hazards in the final draft of our Talbert Gap Redevelopment Flood Control Project. Environmental Impact Report. ' It is my hope that this letter has addressed your concerns . If you have any further `ques.tions , please contact Hal Simmons of my staff at 536-5271 . sincerely , W. Florence. Webb Renior Planner FW:hS: lcp (136.7a) 102584 Katz Hol l i s MMJNMC 1 PARTS II AND III of the REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL on the PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for the TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT i 5 Prepared by i KATZ, HOLLIS, COREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for the HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY October, 1984 Katz Hol 1 is TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA. . . . . II-1 A. Existing Physical Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 1. Project Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 2. Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 a. Existing Land Uses and Acreages. . . . . II-1 b. Community Facilities . . . . . . . . II-2 C. Predominantly Urbanized Area . . . . . . II-2 3. Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 a. Lots (Parcels) Subject To Being Sub- merged By Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . II=2 b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facili- ties and Utilities . . II-4 (1) Development of the Flood Control System. . . . . . . . . . . II-5 (2) Channel Deficiencies. . . . . . . . 1I-6 (3) Pumping Station Deficiencies. . . . II-8 (4) Storm Drain Deficiencies. . . . . . II-9 (5) Drainage Systems Improvements Planned or Under Construction . . . II-10 (6.) Drainage System Improvements Under Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . II-11 B. Existing Social Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . II-12 C. Existing Economic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . II-13 PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 A. General Financing Methods Available to Agency. . . III-1 B. Tax Increment Financing Method . . . . . . II.I-1 C. Estimated Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 D. Proposed Financing Method. . . . . . . . . . . . III-4 (i) KatZHolfis TABLE OF MAPS Page Following MAP 1 General Plan Land Uses Within Project Area . . . . II-1 MAP 2 February 16, 1983 Flood Insurance Rate Map . . . . II-2 MAP 3 Flooded Areas Resulting From March, 1983 Storm. II-3 MAP 4 Drainage Channels and Pumping Stations . . . II-4 MAP 5 Deficient Storm Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-9 MAP 6 Talbert Valley Channels Project Locations. . . . . II-2 TABLE OF TABLES Table II-1 Project Area Land Uses. . . . . . . . . . II-1 Table III-1 Estimated Public Improvements and Facilities Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . III-3 Table III-2 Estimated Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . III-4 PHOTOGRAPHS Plates 1 through 13. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-12 (ii) K1tzHollis PARTS II AND III OF THE REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INTRODUCTION The following two sections of the Report to the City Council ( "City Council" ) of the City of Huntington Beach on the proposed Rede- velopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan") for the .Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project ("Project") , have been prepared by Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. (Katz Hollis) for the Huntington Beach Redevel- opment Agency ("Agency") pursuant to Sections 33352(b) and (c) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. ) : Description of Physical, Social and Economic Conditions Existing in Project Area, and Proposed' Method of Financing Redevelopment of Project Area. Two additional sections of the Report to City Council will be prepared by Katz Hollis and submitted subsequent to receipt of required documents, or completion of the activities of the authorities involved: Summary of Consultations With Affected Taxing Agencies, and Analysis of Report of the County Fiscal Officer (CRL Section 33352[m] ) . Agency staff are preparing all remaining sections of the Report to City Council on the proposed Project Redevelopment Plan. The sec- tions contained herein and those to be prepared by Katz Hollis at a later date, together with the sections prepared by Agency staff, consti- tute the full Report to City Council. (1) Katz liol l is PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA Information presented in this Part II -of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency's Report to City Council on the Proposed Redevelop- ment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project was compiled from various sources, including: -- Interviews with staff of the Agency, City, County and Coun- ty environmental .consultants. -- A . review and analysis of various reports, documents, photo- graphs, plans (including the General Plan) and other back- ground data provided by City/Agency staff. -- A field survey of the Project Area conducted by Katz Hollis in August, 1984. The principal objective of the survey was to confirm. and photographically document' Project Area con- ditions. In general, all sources of data are cited throughout this Part II of the Report to City Council. A. Existing Physical Conditions 1: Project. Location The geographical area encompassed by the Talbert Gap Redevelop- ment Project (the "Project Area") forms a U-shape with an irregular boundary that follows arterial streets and includes approximately .1,200 feet on .either side , of the three drainage channels that lie south of Talbert Avenue in the southeastern portion of the City of Huntington Beach. Garfield Avenue, a portion of the northern boundary, and Newland Street, a portion of the eastern boundary, separate Huntington Beach and the City of Fountain Valley. The Huntington Beach Channel (drainage channel DO1) forms the southernmost boundary. The location of the Proj- ect Area . within the City of Huntington Beach and its surrounding envi- rons can be seen in Map 1. 2. Land Uses a. Existing Land Uses and Acreages The land uses permitted by the Huntington Beach General Plan are an accurate reflection of existing land uses in the Project Area. A land use diagram of the General Plan is exhibited in Map 1. There are a variety of uses in the Project Area, with residential uses predominating. Project Area land uses and acreages are presented in Table II-1. (II-1) Land use Cok pone: ) li'yF= RESIDENTIAL Low-Density . a''I 6'. Medium Density " A ® v ®High Density COMMERCIAL ` 1• 'fir, T ., G �p ,• „�,l,r:. u,••,. � i` P �P10 � _ '-� It. General I;�• — ""T ®Visitor - Serving ! 1 e. - INDUSTRIAL n, - ©General — OPEN SPACE -- ®Recreation --- _ = _ • _ OTHER USES � rof ' ._�TS I I., Q' Public,Quasi—Publ`.-.:,J r Institutional l • d `�' �;• _ _ -r�� � I'� ®Planned Community 7...: •.u.; ....�e, ,. �. _ , �k 11 L►.Il [�Planning Reserve -�l y111� l..,. �� LLi ll II Itl11Ull -, ,fTuTi ' N' I• `.I ,� ;., IIA lI TT T Aff GENERAL PLAN shy .' ' V Y, LAND USES WITHIN AREA PROJECT' r ! SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEP'T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Katz Hol 1 is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KatzHollis Table II-1 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Project PROJECT AREA LAND USES Percentage Land Use Acres of Total Residential 1,658 82% Commercial 61 3% Industrial 20 18 Public Uses, including Open Space, Planning Reserve, Institutional, Streets, and Utility Right-of-Ways 162 8% Vacant 121 68 TOTAL 2,022 100% -------------- Source: Huntington Beach Department of Development Services i KatzHollis i � The residential areas include at least four large mobile home parks. Commercial areas are generally local-serving retail. b. Community Facilities The Project Area contains two fire stations (the Bushard Street and Lake Street Stations) , the Banning Street Library Annex, the Edison Community Center, ten schools, and three parks. The parks are typically located adjacent to schools. Elementary schools in the Project Area in- clude: Peterson, William E. Kettler, Eader, Isaac Sowers, Wardlow, Tal- bert and St. Francis. Edison High School, the Huntington Special Center and a branch of Coastline Community College also lie in, and serve, the Project Area. C. Predominantly Urbanized Area The Project Area is an area of the community which is a predomi- nantly urbanized area in that not less than 80 percent of the privately owned property in the Project Area has been or is developed for urban uses. 3. Properties The Project Area is characterized by properties which suffer from the threat of deterioration or disuse because of the factors described below and illustrated in part by the photographs appearing in Plates 1 through 13. a. Lots' (parcels) Subject to Being Submerged by Water Flooding and flood control problems are the most important blight factors impacting the Project Area. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's current Flood Insurance Rate Map, exhibited in Map 2, shows at a glance that virtually all of the Project Area lies in a 100-year flood plain. The western boundary of the Project Area has been described as the former west bank of the Santa Ana River. Both 100-year floods and 100-year storms are defined as phenomena that do not necessarily occur only once every hundred year.s, but gener- ally have a 1% probability of occurring in any given year. While a 100- year flood typically results from a 100-year storm, such a storm, though causing a very intensive rainfall, may be localized in a small geograph- ical area. A 100-year flood typically represents a much greater volume of water than a 100-year storm, with effects on a larger. geographical area. The northern portions of the Project Area are within zone A0, de- fined as an area subject to a 100-year flood, with inundation between one and three feet but no flood hazard factors determined. Average inun- (II-2) ) ...o,. i Z E:B ::>:::<::: <:::::< ZONE A O DEPTH 3 ( ) r ZONE AO (DEPTH 1) ,�. ZONE AH (EL 1 W ' ZONE AO (DEPTH 2) Z ZONE AO — _ LI (DEPTH 3) ZONE EKnM ATrCN A' Areas of 100-year flood; he flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. ZONE A8 (El 11-14 AO Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths arp betwom one (1) and three(3) feet; average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors are determined. ZONE Al2 Ali Arens of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are (EL 11) between one (1) and three (3) feet; base flood elevations are sham, but no flood hazard factors determined. Al-A30 Arens of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. „r R Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500-year flood; or certain areas subject to 100-year flooding with average depths less thin .xr_ (1) foot or wMre the contributing drai.nnge area is lens them one sgw-ire mile; or areas prxtccted by letn!ns from the barn floor]. r• Am7R of minimtl flmlinq- V Ar(v-Ls of lC -yr%,%r omantal flnarl with velocity (wive ne-ticm); 1►aae flmd elevatirns and florid MIArd facinra r»t ek4 ermined. VI-V30 Area■ of 100-year omatal fle'sod with velocity re(wm action); here flnnd ewlatione and floes FEBRUARY 16, 1983 hazard factors determne id. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP SOURCE:FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. Katz Hol 1 is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAP Z Katz Hollis dation depth is estimated at three feet. The remainder of the Project Area is within flood zones A8 (EL11-14) and Al2 (Ell) , defined as areas subject to a 100-year flood with base flood elevations between eleven and fourteen feet or below eleven feet, respectively. The source of the flood threat in these three zones is the Santa Ana River, adjacent to the Project Area on the east. Huntington Beach is part of a larger drainage basin which covers 3,200 square miles and includes much of Orange County. Regional agen- cies, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. and the Orange County Flood Control District, are responsible for providing drainage facili- ties which are adequate to accommodate runoff from all sections of the basin, so that rain falling outside the City of Huntington Beach will flow into the regional facilities and be carried through the City to the ocean. Deficiencies in drainage facilities serving the entire basin have increased the risk of flooding in Huntington Beach much more than in other areas of the basin. Over time, design standards for flood control and drainage facil- ities in Orange County and the City of Huntington Beach have changed. Currently the Federal Emergency Management Agency standard requires that flood control facilities should accommodate a storm of 100-year inten- sity. Most' of the regional facilities, however, are constructed at 65% design capacity of a twenty-five year storm. The Orange County Director of Public Works reported that an intense storm on March 1, 1983 appeared to be in the 100-year frequency range and helped expose the seriousness of deficiencies in the regional flood control system. This is discussed in more detail below. Lots that were flooded during the March, 1983 storm are shown on Map 3. The Red Cross prepared reports of major damage to 182 houses, almost all in the Project Area. The City Fire Department estimated that city-wide, 200 homes suffered major damage totaling $13.4 million and an additional 580 homes were damaged to some degree. Voluntary evacuation was urged for the more than 30,000 residents south of Garfield Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard, with 800 ordered to evacuate their homes by emergency services personnel. Several hundred residents spent the night in five evacuation shelters. City staff estimate that emergency services and repairs to cor- rect damages caused by the storm cost eight City departments close to $500,000. Expenses necessitated by the storm included: roadway repairs; sandbagging; barricade and emergency equipment rental; debris removal; damages to streets signs, lights, and traffic control panels; tree loss; electrical costs to restore service; pump station repairs; and shelter, transportation and feeding costs related to the evacu- ations. Suits against the City for claims for damages from the flood have totalled nearly $100 million. Resolution of the suits will cost an estimated $100,000 to $300,000 in salaries and court costs alone. It is (II-3) j swa 1 cIANNEL uumm EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY / CHANNEL D05 WAS l ' ,.loom,., Is ,., ,.,7P. ' � --- — '� HARY RKTOWN P.S. CHA OUNDiMAN�' ADAMS TA�BERT # :iNDRNAPOLIS S. CHf,NNEL j D02 f Howurota i 'NATLANTA P S: MEREDITH P.S. • + 1 GTON BEACH 1 L DOI I I -----' • �tuwa► 1 _ I HAMILTON 3�I�iVUIND P.S. P.S. i i ' iow ING P.S. I • SANTA ANA I i RIVER E01 FLOODED AREA OVERTOPPED LEVEE • PUMPING STATION FLOODED.. .AREAS RESULTING FROM MARCH, 1983 STORM SOURCES:. HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT AMERICAN RED CROSS ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ENGINEER TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 3 Katz HOl I IS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT KatzHollis clear that the 1983 storm imposed a severe impact upon the City's fi- nancial and other resources. Unless measures are taken to correct the flood control system deficiencies, a similar disaster could reoccur at any time. Photographs shown on plates 1 through 7 were taken in early March, 1983 and depict the flooded areas and drainage channel failures. The front page of the "Huntington Beach Independent" newspaper portrays the gravity of the problem. Plate 3 illustrates the levee failures that were partly responsible for the flooding .of the mobile home park south of Garfield and west of Brookhurst, depicted in Plate 2. Construction. of a partial lining of that portion of the channel is now underway by the Orange County Flood Control District, as shown in Plate 12.. Flooding in the area to the west of the Huntington Beach Channel (DO1) north of Atlanta, south of Indianapolis and east of Beach is shown from the air in Plate 4. Water rose to eight feet in the streets (Plate 5, top) and commercial, as well as residential, properties were affected (Plate 5, bottom) . The channel adjacent to that area, flowing close to the top, is shown in Plate 6. Overtopped levees were the cause of flooding in the area, around Adams Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street, viewed in Plate 7. b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facilities and Utilities The drainage system, comprised of storm drain pipes, pumping sta- tions and flood control channels, suffers from numerous deficiencies. These deficiencies have been the contributing factor in the flooding of residential and other lots in the Project Area, as described in the pre- ceding section. The general layout of the system within the Project Area, consisting of three flood control channels totalling nearly eleven miles, and nine pumping stations, is exhibited in Map 4. Several agencies are responsible for providing and maintaining the drainage system. The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) is responsible for those regional flood control facilities in the County of Orange which serve more than one jurisdiction and for drainage facilities which drain areas of 500 acres or greater. County facilities within the Project Area include one pumping station and three earthern channels. Local drainage facilities that drain 500 acres or less are under the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach. Within the Project Area, the City maintains eight pumping stations plus local storm drains leading to and from the pumping stations. While the OCFCD is responsible for the Santa Ana River channel, the U.S. Army Corps of En- gineers holds responsibility for major flood control projects throughout the country, and is planning large scale flood control improvements to the Santa Ana River. The river lies just to the east of the Project Area and forms the southeastern boundary of the City of Huntington Beach. (II-4) SLATER ;;IANNEL A TAIRERT EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL D05 Euls ;>> 1 p � I�IHIo1n1 1 1■ 1t11............ OAfE LI ' HARPER i Y RKTOWN P.S. CHANNEL IV FLOUNDER P.S4- �n i 1 ------- KTO 01 iADAMSI i i r P.S. i I 1 ` ADAAIS 1 ADAMS ;.S. TA�BERT INDIANAPOLIS P-S ` CHS4NNEL I 1 D02 i f NOIANAPOUS i I � � �ATLANTA P.S: I i MEREDITH P.S. HUNTINGTON BEACH j CHANNEL D01 i I AILANU I i I I 'HAMILTON NEW LAND P.S. P.S.; r--j LION BANNING P.S. SANTA ANA RIVER E01 i 1 LEGEND CITY CHANNELS \ \• CITY PUMP STATIONS � COUNTY CHANNELS • COUNTY PUMP STATION Drainage Channels & Pumping Stations SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEP'T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TA FLOOD Katz Hol l is REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT L MAP 4 KatzHoltis (1) Development of the Flood Control System Overall, the Orange County Flood Control District is working with a flood control system that was constructed to 65% design capacity for a 25-year flood for an anticipated population of 340,000 people, now meet- ing the needs of a population of two million and the standards of a 100- year level of protection. A combination of factors - rapid population growth, development pressures, changing standards, and funding con- straints - have produced the current condition of the flood control sys- tem. Due to the City's geographical position at the ocean outlet of the flood control system serving a drainage basin of 3,200 square miles the City is impacted disproportionately by the regional system's deficiencies. In 1954, the County Board of Supervisors commissioned a study on the construction and improvement of flood control . facilities in the County. The report, submitted in 1955, found the existing facilities could not accommodate future growth in the .County, and projected a popu- lation of 340,000 by 1960. The report recognized that construction of the entire system to ultimate design capacity would be prohibitively costly, so initial construction of minimum requirements (earth lined channels) was recommended. The plan provided for acquiring sufficient rights-of-way so that .channels could be upgraded with concrete lining and design improvements as needed. The ultimate runoff quantities in the 1955 plan were based on the following criteria: main flood. control facilities to handle runoff from a storm that may reasonably be expected to occur every 25 years in flat urban areas, every 50 years in foothill areas, and every 100 years in areas controlled by dams. In 1956, a bond issue was approved by the County's voters to fund channel construction. Most channels were built of earth, providing 2/3 of the 25-year protection level with concrete lining intended to provide the additional 1/3 capacity when funds were available for construction. Improvements continued to be built to the 1956 standards until 1973 when a higher level of protection was adopted with the acceptance of the fed- eral standards in the National Flood Insurance Act, based on a 100-year flood, as the criteria for construction. With the exception of the 1956 bond issue, no bond issues for flood control have passed in the last 30 years. Elections failed. in 1966 and 1967. Construction of new facilities and improvements to existing facilities have been funded by regular property tax revenues, by interest on flood control monies, by developers as part of their conditions of development for specific projects, and, since Proposition 13, by special district augmentation funds. Understandably, these sources have not produced adequate funds to improve all channels to cur- rent standards. Improvements have been funded on an annual basis, sub- ject to available funds, with priorities established annually by recom- mendations of the City Engineers Flood Control Advisory Committee. (II-5) K1tzHollis Huntington Beach's local serving drainage system, similar to many other newer Orange County cities, initially developed in an ad-hoc man- ner with little engineering, planning or design to correlate the facil- ity size with expected rainfall runoff and future integration into a total system. In 1960, the City adopted the first Master Plan of Drain- age, and has had numerous revisions since. (2) Channel Deficiencies City drainage facilities are designed to accommodate only the water that falls in Huntington Beach, but the City is part of a larger drainage basin and contains regional flood control facilities that serve all of the basin. Rainfall falling outside the City is expected to flow into these regional channels, the responsibility of the Orange County Flood Control District, and be carried through the City. As previously discussed, however, the channels are generally operating at 65% of 25- year storm capacity, so that during a 100-year storm, areas of the City adjacent to regional channels are subject to flooding. Therefore Hunt- ington Beach is forced to suffer from deficiencies in a regional-serving system. In April, 1983, following the 100-year storm of March, 1983 des- cribed above, the Director of Public Works of the Orange County Environ- mental Management Agency prepared a report for the Agency's Executive Director regarding the channel failures in the Talbert Valley area. The report stated in part: The unusual convergence of high tides, high surf and a rainstorm on January 27, 1983 gave the first serious indi- cation of potential flood channel problems when an 8.5 foot tide began affecting leveed channels in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. When the Huntington Beach Channel began to overflow, sandbagging operations were successful in maintaining the integrity of the levee. A breach in the levee damaged by ground squirrel activity was also contain- ed by sandbagging operations at that time with minimal flooding of private property. Details of the channel failures resulting from the March, 1983 storm, as contained in the Public Works Director's report, were as fol- lows: Huntington Beach Channel (Channel D01) -- U/S DO2 confluence left side Flow in excess of channel capacity combined with high surf and high tide. Problem exacerbated by levee set- tlement caused by compressible underlying strata. (II-6) Katz.Hullis -- U/S Magnolia to Newland, both sides. Flow .in excess of channel capacity combined with high surf, high tide and levee settlement. -- D/S Atlanta, left side. High surf, high tide and heavy rains caused flow in excess of channel capacity. Levee breached by erosive effect of overflow. -- U/S Atlanta to Adams, both .sides. Same as above. Talbert Channel (Channel D02) -- Left side at D01 confluence. Flooding adjacent area because of high water in chan- nel coming out of existing CMP which had a broken floodgate. -- U/S Banning at Walk Bridge, both sides. Overtopping because of low profile of city installed -- walk bridge and .flow in excess of channel capacity. U/S Atlanta, left side. Overtopping caused backslope erosion and breaches in two areas. High surf, high tide and heavy rains re- sulted in flow in excess of channel capacity. -- U/S Adams at Walk Bridge, both sides. Overtopped 3 inches. Same as above. -- D/S Yorktown, left side. Breach initiated by undetected gopher hole and high flow in channel. Fountain Valley Channel (Channel D05) -- Flood U/S of confluence with D02. There were several reasons for the channel failures. In the Hun- tington Beach - Fountain Valley area, the leveed design of the channels makes them more vulnerable to breaching during heavy runoff than incised channels where localized erosion was the more prevalent mode of damage. A major factor in the March, 1983 storm was the occurrence of tidal backwater during the storm which further impacted channel flow. Storm runoff from streets was pumped into the leveed channels where tidal con- ditions and runoff from the upstream areas were already causing high channel flows. Levee overflow back into the streets overtaxed the pumping • (II-7) KatzHollis stations. Damage to levees from burrowing animals was said to be not significant given the high intensity rainfall and runoff conditions of the storm. High surf and a backflow into the channels during high tide exacerbated conditions but the single overriding factor in the channel failures was rainfall intensities and runoff rates in excess of channel capacity. (3) Pumping Station Deficiencies Pumping stations are a critical element in the drainage system, removing rain water from the storm drains below the street and deposit- ing the water into the drainage channels. Pumping station failure dur- ing a high volume storm could produce significant flooding in the area drained by the pumping station. Plates 8 and 9 and Map 4 depict the pumping stations within the, Project Area. Six of the., eight pumping sta- tions within the Project Area owned by the City of Huntington Beach re- quire improvements ranging from replacement of pumps and engines to con- struction of an additional building with two pumps. The County owned pumping station (Plate 13, top) was recently refurbished. In 1979, the City commissioned the firm of L. D. King Engineer- ing, Inc. to analyze the capacity and condition of the city's pumping stations. A number . of deficiencies were identified, with improvements implemented since the conclusion of the study.. However, City staff have identified the following pump station deficiencies, and improvements , that are currently needed: -- Flounder Pump Station, 9731 Flounder Lane - Major modifica- tions of the pump station and incoming line are needed be- cause incoming flows are much greater than the established run-off reported in the Master .Plan for Drainage, resulting in localized flooding. -- Indianapolis Pump Station, 9221 Indianapolis Avenue - Re- placement of two of the smaller engines and pumps with larger units is needed because incoming flows are greater than those reported in the Master Plan for Drainage. -- Newland Pump Station, 8612 Hamilton Avenue - Construction of an additional building with two pumps will become neces- sary shortly, as vacant property nearby is developed. -- Adams Pump Station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - Replacement of two engines will be needed when storm drain capacity lead- ing to the station is improved; presently inadequate storm drains are causing street flooding within the tracts sur- rounding the station. (II-8) KatzHollis a -- Yorktown Pump Station, 9221 Yorktown - Replacement of one pump and engine is needed because the station is under capacity. -- Atlanta Pump Station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue - Addition of a sump pump in the south building is currently needed. (4) Storm Drain Deficiencies The City's Master Plan of Drainage describes two types of storm drain facilities and their standards: master planned and local. Storm drains 39" or larger are considered master-planned facilities, with the City responsible for design and construction. Storm drains less than 39" in diameter_ are considered local facilities and are the responsibil- ity of private developers and property owners. Developers who provide master planned facilities may be reimbursed by the City. Since it is economically infeasible for the City to design all local drainage facil- ities to accommodate run-off from a 100-year storm (the minimum criteria for flood safety set by the Federal Insurance Administration) dwelling units can be elevated so that the lower level of the structure is above the level of flooding expected during a 100-year storm. The City reviews the grading plans of new subdivisions and other large developments to ensure that .the units are elevated above the level of a 100-year storm. • In general, the City's Public Works Department designs new drain- age facilities so that during a ten-year storm at least one lane of travel in both directions is open on all City arterials, and flood wa- ters do not exceed the top of the curb on local streets. In "sump" or low areas where water naturally collects, new drainage facilities are designed to accommodate a 25-year storm. Storm drain deficiencies, defined as the inability of a drain to convey the amount of run-off necessary to meet the City's flood protec- tion standards discussed above for 10- and 25-year storms were identi- fied in the 1979 drainage study conducted by L. D. King Engineering, Inc. The following storm drain improvements would correct deficiencies in the Project Area and have been .included in the City's Capital Im- provements Program for Fiscal Years 1988-89. The location of. these improvements is depicted in Map 5. -- at the Adams pump station, a 60-inch storm drain to paral- lel the existing pipe from the pump station to Bushard Street ' in Adams Avenue because the existing 60-inch pipe can convey only . 50% of the design discharge (Drainage Dis- trict 7B) -- at the Banning pump station, a 54-inch storm drain in Ban- ning Avenue and a 42-inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to parallel the existing pipes because the existing pipes can convey about 50% of the design discharge (Drainage Dis- trict 7C) (II-9) SLAM ,JlANNEL EAST VALLEY- FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL D05 -- -- -- HARPER i Y RKTOWN P.S. CHANNEL 1 I OUNDER P. i 4DAMS' ' • J P.S- ADAMS �.S. TA�BERT i INDIANAPOLIS PS,' CHf6NNEL i 02 i I • wowuran ""ATLANTA P& I i MEREDITH P.S. HUNT NGTON BEACH CHANNEL DOI I , I • �uwa i I 1HAMILTON i NEW LAND P.S. P.S. i BAN'11ING P.S. SANTA ANA RIVER EOI i DEFICIENT STORM DRAINS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT DEFICIENT- STORM DRAINS SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE,CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM,'FY 1984-1989 Katz Hol l is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL MAP 5 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Katz Hol l is -- in the vicinity of the Atlanta pump station, a network of drains including a 30-inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/Delaware and Elmira/Delaware area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach Bou- levard to correct the deficiency of missing drains (Drain- age District 8B) -- at the Indianapolis Pump station, a 54-inch storm drain to parallel the existing storm drain from the pump station to Bushard Street (.Drainage District 7F) -- in the vicinity of the Fountain Valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains includ- ing an 84-inch storm drain to parallel the existing 84-inch storm drain from the channel to Brookhurst Street where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2000 feet then branches north and south with 24-inch storm drains. The Community Facilities element of the General Plan discusses the fact that these drainage deficiencies have typically resulted from rapid urbanization and changing design standards. As an area develops, • drainage facilities should be installed so that there is adequate capacity at ultimate build-out. However, many storm drains in Huntington Beach were designed for the. runoff volumes predicted by formulas and criteria which reflected the state of the art at that time. The City and sur- rounding drainage areas urbanized .more extensively than anticipated by County and City agencies, and the paved .urban. surfaces created larger run-off volumes than originally predicted. In 1973, the Orange County Flood Control District published a revised Hydrology Manual to reflect the higher rainfall run-off conditions, but many of the City's storm drains were installed prior to the revised standards. (5) Drainage System Improvements Planned or Under Construction The Orange County. Flood Control District has two drainage system improvement projects underway 'in the Project Area: widening and con- crete lining of the Fountain Valley (D05) channel (Plate 12) and con- struction of a pumping station and creation of a retarding basin at Bartlett Park (Plate 13, bottom) . Improvements to the Fountain Valley Channel (Channel D05) now under construction include: 1) replacing the existing earthern channel from Garfield Avenue south and west to. the Talbert Channel with a rec- tangular reinforced concrete channel of walls from nine to ten feet high and a channel bottom width of 50 to 65 feet; 2) constructing a conflu- ence with the Talbert Channel; and 3) increasing the size of the Bushard Street culvert. The sum of $3.4 million was appropriated from the Fiscal (II-10) KatzHollis Year 1983-84 budget for this construction, which should be completed in a few months. The project was undertaken because the channel levees were subject to "overtopping." Annual repairs of drainage to the levees from storm related erosion 'became necessary. The amount of water that escapes by overtopping is said to be not necessarily great enough to cause a serious problem by itself. But with sufficient duration and severity, portions of the earthern levee could erode away and allow the channel waters to leave the channel, as occurred during the storm of March, 1983 (see Plates 2 and 3) . When staff of the Orange County Environmental Management Agency submitted their report to the Orange County Board of Supervisors seeking approval of the plans and authorization to solicit bids on the project, the report noted: 'The concrete improvements will increase flood protec- tion by the prevention of levee failures; however, the designed capacity cannot be achieved until major downstream improvements are constructed. Local flooding, caused by water before it reaches the channel may occur until additional local drainage improvements are constructed by the City [of Huntington Beach] ." The Flood Control District's current budget also includes $2 mil- lion for the construction of a pumping station to the north of Adams • Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard, just to the north of the County- owned pumping station on Adams (Plate 13, top) . In addition, the unde- veloped area known as Bartlett Park, which currently functions as a natural retarding basin, would be surrounded by an earthern levee to increase its capacity for holding flood water. No excavation will be necessary for this improvement. The project is now in the design stage and a contract for construction should be awarded by June 30, 1985. (6) Drainage System Improvements Under Consideration Earlier this year, the Orange County Flood Control District con- tracted with the engineering firm of Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates to prepare a project report and environmental impact report (EIR) on upgrading the system of flood control channels known as the Talbert Valley channels. The Talbert Valley channels are comprised of the Huntington Beach, Talbert and Fountain Valley channels (DO1, DO2, and DO5) . The northeast portion is in _ the City of Fountain Valley. They were constructed to accommodate about 65% of a 25-year storm (or less than a ten-year storm) . The purpose of the project is to upgrade the channels to 100-year storm capacity, the contemporary design stan- dard. Correcting the channel deficiencies to accomodate the waters of 100-year storms, without improvements to the Santa Ana River capacity, will not necessarily prevent the occurrence of a 100-year flood. Drafts of the Bein/Frost report have discussed seven alternative projects, which include various sites for retarding basins as well as (II-11) Katz Holl is different combinations of lined and unlined channels. Retarding basins and partially lined, rather than all rectangular concrete lined channels have been proposed for cost effectiveness. Several alternatives consi- der relocation of, the ocean outlet to approximately 2,000 feet northwest of its present location. Two decisions are critical to the selection of one of the alter- natives and the definition of the final design:- the choice of retarding basin sites and the location of the ocean outlet. The width and confi- guration of the channels is particularly dependent on the location and capacity of the retarding basins. The various sites of the retarding basins are ,exhibited in Map 6. It is difficult to project when a final decision '. on an alternative. may be made; there are indications of poten- tial controversy- concerning the relocation of the ocean outlet.. The final Bein/Frost project report is expected to. be completed in October, 1984 with circulation of the draft EIR starting then also. Construction of the project can be undertaken in phases. Even with full construction of the project, technically the flood plain established in the Flood Insurance Rate Map would not change, because the Santa Ana River would remain a significant flood threat to the Project Area. For nearly twenty years, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has studied the need for improvements, known as the Main Stem Project, that would enable the Santa Ana River to accommodate flood waters . in excess of a 100-year storm. Within the City of Huntington Beach, the project would involve widening the mouth of the Santa Ana River and relocating the southern- most end of the Talbert (D02) channel. Congress is currently consider- ing authorization of the project, and . if budget appropriations are forthcoming, design studies would get underway next' year. The Corps is also seeking authorization of an "Interim Three Project" to gather data on local drainage systems, such as that of Huntington Beach that feed into the Main Stem Project. If approved, . these studies would begin in 1989 and would contribute to implementation of the Main Stem Project. B. Existing Social Conditions The estimated population of the Project Area. is 27,835 persons residing in 8,590 housing units, according to the 1980 U.S. Census. Traditional indices of social conditions in redevelopment project areas such as population characteristics, income levels, employment and unem- ployment, crime rates, etc. do not have a bearing on the main cause of blight in the Project Area. (II-12) .�.�,1 .• �. '� .M'.� •w. tee' J , uJ �'��' • • il'ri L -� -�:�i .,.:,.rr FOUNTAIN VALLEY' �S = ' �I •S: i... r - • ••1• 4.-�• N _ - ��•� �rIt..j�. t .�1 e0a; !��• ►- »!,!t,. VALLEY' v •. • RETARDING 'Z ti��` >s ;q, n' I - •- BASIN SITE 1 •Q • C Z:: 3 IA VAL �� _ �•' �' -�I r RETARDING r^ Yam• t c1 �� -� — I �• - Reach 9 BASIN SITE 2'=` IL �' =. �---, El •--- '•�_ _ N RETARDING �r• sox _, I i 9-. �Q BASIN SITE 3 ' DOM i fF Lu �••r:4: ItETARDIN 4.Z or —� �' • •;r �; p /'BASIN SITE 6 Cv "°'�� �r � I� � -• o i ; �e>®: � � i; . COSTA o HUNTINGTON ui l..- t`''°'; •^--. �- �- ' W , , ,_•:- 'BEACH .. = J -�— -,p.�•_., / ....,n•..--• •• _ 2 c �••��-•.1 is r• Fa•- t ( : :� C?-r —..r — i' L do CD MN w ' C BASIN SITE 4 Z --RETARDING.-- BASIN SITE 5� a� • ` .Jr J I_fta ; 00. In . k� wl on TALBERT VALLEY CHANNELS rt FACILITY NOS. DOI,D02& DO5 ?.• Project Location `'• �'� �w 9�>bet`Baiq'WJLue•Fio�ILaic.`/tt+ar�rt+ �''i� \ 9� � 'F' -%'��. .-j itlli::f11J�.,a�i�iJ 1N 22253 lb Katz Hol l iS TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAP 6 Katz Hol 1 i s C. Existing Economic Conditions The analysis of land uses presented earlier describes the amount of land in the project area devoted to commercial and 0industrial uses. Discussions with brokers of residential real estate within the Project Area indicate that some prospective home buyers have expressed reluctance about purchasing homes in the areas that experienced severe flooding in the March, 1983 storm. (II-13) . HUI%MNGTON:,:Inaem. , it • -Vol.1983,tie.9 Mrrertryrew so=k hangings Va "Citwrrta. Nea 66 Pager Thousands evacuate! In HB floor Pier damaged by pounding surfs Ity ROGER BLOOM storm that dumped ay��y S Muslim=Farm on GoWenwast '. a swans. inches d etin on the city in less Street HUNTINGTON BEACH — than 2e hw^breathing or ebmt• And activity overnight For the second time in less thane over flood control&n in I 7lmadg7 np�u6atS�ppad ewq about month,nature lashed out at the locations,inuodsti�some I,OOD 20 feet of the sod d the dty pier`` Pack Coot Tueday and areas homes and ausiq the—0-11 ry reeving The Bnd Cde yerehert of Hu�ogWo Beech which oar- evacuationoftharaodadpaopls. penloualy above the ro atkm rowFq graded diwter io dmuary One man,Armando Cards,1T, rod Wdnedsy mamhq. were cot o fortuna4 this time of Huntington Both,died Ttres- City officials eetimatd the around. day inmeing whoa V wes olettro- total damage to he In cwm of f142 March blew in like a lion this =d while trying to Omar some millioordTussdgeveaiog.. year,all right with a ferocious equipment at the Ocean View The eontheaat Qiorfer d the city.south d Csef Avenue and .x: sot of Beach Boulevard,was off by th�uesday W C the threat d flooding and to pro vent looting of autmbd reel- - ffm-!, deuces. A vot�tary avaaution - °l••' wes put into effect.fn the entire+' . arse.with evadidlon scoters MET TUEYOAY Thousands of HWIthlg- 4 dPweaa� tan Beach residents were evacuated due to t iq i p :nC,0 r domn,,,god flooding(below)caused by a severe slam r5 lgarkes gad Tuesday.In ed6tWay.20 }d the-►pstty� a, Btttbdsa�e�ey ma ten Beech par labove)Wae treeit80 away.At `tip c t 'cx bile home Imek tv%W.bepm right evaumted sohod children gal a tee n•r f arriving at Huntington Beach kirsch at the vaaefoorderad up at HtnWpsort 1046&bwi at n=the Beach High,Oita resident(bottom)used a { u kbh a } ` Bader Elementary d Edam boat to evaouate his waler�l0ed hone. s• `•"` *+' n High strode,whk3 had cab hem raMr.w uawar.� �'.^r • ._ Y ..g' closed ad wwated,and rear - - 1� # dents of the teed of hoses set of S ti Beach Boulevard I,, - ladi- an't WAITING FOR VORMV Elp—f3eraldlne KNOW comforts is onde fha/let d wifar s : Fern Jones at the relief center set up at Ikprtetglon Beach High Soma bAw molar blenkwk School.Both were evacuated t boded from their( homm. some pltyd reds with their mverera.wo— PiimnoFLOOD nod pep Q a ' g a _ rr Taaa7aWM.: ROAM! - iMdAMArOtJ!- ATL MTA- .t HAWLTON PACY OC£AN y7, 47�` BAMNMG ±'•`t i::= ,. y DAMAGE WAB HEAVINSIT in the southeast areas are shown above. < +.'�? w �_�•�.; quarter of Huntington Beach. The flooded �� "- ►-'gas Katz Hol 1 is TALBERT GAP. FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT a o 0 ° p O no 11 0 Lvv o r• 5" o ink lope-,, ? # ' 7711a: 5, w - �' .' �. '. � '._wr r�.e�," 4, _•. ... . its.44. �o r zgE t v. • r b Mobile home park south of Garfield, west of Brookhurst, adjacent to Fountain Valley Channel (D05), March 1983 storm. Kitt I Q 14)11iS TALL RT OAP BLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT LRL ATE 2 .. . e•..+•.n'r�•t:-,i^'*^s�^'_�"`.�. -�.'_�. _ —�► •r..r_�. .,per .J.�` .. _ f�.'i.' gyp•' ;.�'� .Y t /• i l V_ � fr {�. ; TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT • PROJECT • �, woo ` WOW 4, 400 • i e w 10 • • • • � 1 • • • lob— WWII • • .•• • 91 •: • .,ram w �ewry� .i a i Intersection of Beach Boulevard and Mermaid Circle, March 1983 storm. �r c • Office building on Beach, south of Sunset Circle, March 1983 storm. Katz Hol 1 iS TA REDEVELOPMENOT PROJECT PLATE 5 O q R 4�• /may✓ , -11 Cr ?3:.' �� ,'fit` ,�� ��';4a � •„ View of Huntington Beach Channel (D01), north of Indianapolis, March 1983 storm. ��� �� 00Z TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTRO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT P L 6 ���lii + •is�,Y r' � �" �, .� { �w,hE � �,^��� � "a�� ,y� o..�, � '� �,.ry ',��,,E¢�T,�'Y i' i .,i rc ���� �� � �`�x•�A# �It h'�"�^,x � � �+..�...• ..' �r 1, R y i .v� .� 6� k , k.Kf�-f2 3r+�,� r.}' I ••(.�: l p d .y�+y Y��f C �y 31. IT xt w„C VI lot ti t .y REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OWNED PUMPING STATIONS Adams Pumping Station ,,,,,....... 4 19961 Chesapeake Lane I. r J = Yorktown Pumping Station i 9211 Yorktown Avenue ffL)1 Banning Pumping Station 22011 Malibu Lane Katz Holt is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 8 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OWNED PUMPING STATIONS i i Newland Pumping Station 8012 Hamilton Avenue Atlanta Pumping Station - _ - 8151 Atlanta Avenue i w5` Indianapolis Pumping Station 9221. Indianapolis Avenue Katz Hol l is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 9 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH CHANNEL 001) 6 y.Sds''rfC l t t v �a f y� Y E' tow•• -. a i 1F 4.1•F � : ,''t r e"L ey'7 �i •tl FY`M v�7�� f -�:,: _ -'d LJ P y A i'7.A;+' S 1 ,.,��•r SY �.11 b»M1 � f.L{EY>.�. _ IV � �fi d.,_ F1`v x•�a �a � �its_�� /� :�? `",' -i� ...< �, '�, . 3 all ®l l ➢s TALBERT CAP FLOOD CONTROL PLAT-E 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT tV.• `rye . i,..�q�' 'i' .7P1•,'13���h 1,.1Yi„G��.�9{�Y���„+ ,�'y�` � yy:`4� �� '�. ,� �A y •. .i— �>� REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY CHANNEL (D05) CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. I � x , r kr e ,n-� ,a���.r• r {(( . 1•"I �itl r.,_.. /.+ �J'.z�'�_Kc�'k ��r('r �1 a 3 _ � _w� ���+^# w -.��i _':�:�.., •'r fir''. ;, >���t'� ��`•x7.t"xr?;�'`�f✓,..i� .v''• �t i �+i t��'� r{• e.T•�e� .d._..o�o'� stw!t z�. /�" ��':� Y c.S�..r,l��rr:e��L'���� �JY� �r F , y mow,.^y.!�� �.�^ •p� •e. d I � 'j fi�Y v 11", ja.' i`1�- r i r•t, �1': ;. e ': -<, a.•• :i e r t ..•tiT t/ W�.i t , �• ,♦ 1 •fyvr �:• ;.�� x�s'��'•,,H��' •' r`+ �•'�T}tie., "� �wc ..0��/A�) iFei!` j g �.� (�,1�,]. !�i •.� 1•.1� "{ t e Ey ,4...0 �. Y�.d��j� t1ea �fry��,1,��.ff����i �+c.�.n,,{,l��ia,rF:•. � �:.: f. �t +A" R �- ���r+'3' icr_ 1 .�"r_' 75. at:(JX�0{i�'.t:.��!�.) r:t.J.�..`at .ti:LlS`Y�h^s.ti[��.�i .��:Fr .. ._X��.:..._ �. .r ..._. ._�xl �•N4:i,'�.'..:j... •r� �.:;2- 1 1 I � ,•;is - ep.. 11 { • I" - _ it 4 5 � Katz. Hol I IS TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 12 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ADDITIONAL COUNTY FACILITIES County-owned r Adams Pumping q6_ _ - -- Station- �f. •� L .•R lr 1� .a. qy�l� � ,,n a...�? ♦ 7 ..//A'' ��'P'lY��i. �i.�rn•pt¢` �' 1 ' ,��;j�i'"CrWVY�: .,l b'� M 9 frd! .y�'� •?j,� �� j.9t.Jy,. �- _�•+,,,,,• �,'��.'`., '=�� �•'�era �R. Bartlett Park, natural retarding basin and site of future pumping station with levee surrounding prop- erty to increase its holding capacity. Katz Hol l is TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL PLATE 13 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Katz of iS PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA A. General Financing Methods Available to Agency The proposed Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to finance the Project with financial assistance from the 'City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, special assess- ment districts, property tax increments, interest revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, .the lease of Agency- owned property, the sale of Agency-owned property, or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. In addition, the City may supply advances and expend money as necessary to assist. the Agency in carrying out the Project. Such as- sistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City and the Agency. B. Tax Increment Financing Method In 1952, the voters of California approved an amendment to the State Constitution which authorized a unique method of financing the public costs associated with redevelopment. Based on this amendment, the California Legislature provided specific statutory authority in the Community Redevelopment Law allowing local redevelopment agencies to use tax increment or . tax allocation financing within formally designated redevelopment project areas. This method has since become the model used by many other states. The basic theory underlying tax increment financing is that re- development projects should pay for themselves. To bring this about, the Community Redevelopment Law provides that when a redevelopment plan for a project area is adopted, the total current taxable value of all taxable property within the area is determined. (The current value is the value on the assessment rolls last equalized prior to the date that . the redevelopment plan is adopted. The last equalized roll is called the "base year roll," and the total taxable value of the taxable prop- erty within the project area shown on that roll is the "base year value.") After the base year value is determined, all taxing agencies who had been previously receiving taxes continue to annually receive the taxes produced from the base year assessment roll. Any taxes which are produced from increases in taxable value in the project area above the base year value, however, are annually allocated to the redevelopment agency to pay the costs it has incurred in carrying out redevelopment activities in the project area. • (III-1) I Katz Hol 1 is Increases in taxable value within redevelopment project areas may occur in the same manner and for the same reasons as increases in other areas. They may be due to routine annual reassessments (limited to a maximum increase of two percent by Proposition 13) ; they may arise from reassessments following changes in property ownership; or they may be occasioned by assessments of new developments being completed and placed on the assessment rolls. The Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area is currently 94 pecent built out. only a marginal amount of development and very little redevelopment of Project Area properties is expected to occur over the 20-year term of the Redevelopment Plan. As a result, future increases in Project Area taxable value will be gen- erated primarily from routine annual reassessments, and reassessments due to property ownership changes. To finance redevelopment activities, a redevelopment agency may incur project costs directly, or it may borrow money, issue bonds or enter into agreements to incur debt. Regardless of the method used to incur. the debt, so long as such debt exists (and providing the agency has requested payment in the manner prescribed by law) , the agency will annually receive the -tax increment produced by the project area. When all loans, bonds, advances and other debts of the agency have been re- tired - or in any year when no such debts have been incurred or carried over from previous years - then the tax increment funds are allocated to the county and other project area taxing agencies in the same manner as taxes produced by the base roll. Assuming there is taxable value above the base year value, and that the redevelopment agency has incurred project debts, .tax increment revenues are payable to that agency during the first fiscal year which begins after January 1st following adoption of the project redevelopment plan. Thus, if a plan is adopted in 1984 and is effective prior to January 1, 1985, the agency would be able to claim tax increments from the project area (if any are generated) for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1985. If the redevelopment plan is not adopted or effective until after January 1, 1985, the agency could not collect tax increments until the fiscal year which commenced on July 1, 1986. After project area values have increased sufficiently to create a moderate or higher annual tax increment "flow," an agency may borrow against the future payment of such increment by issuing bonds or tax anticipation notes, and may fund interest as a part of such borrowing. Realistically, substantial increases in taxable value would have to oc- cur in the project area before the agency could utilize proceeds of tax allocation bonds. other factors which would bear upon a potential bond issue include the current market interest rate, the need to provide as- sured increment flow in excess of projected annual debt service needs, the requirement to set aside up to 20 percent of all tax increment funds for low and moderate income housing purposes, and the provisions and re- • I I (III-2) KatZHollis quirements contained in any fiscal detriment alleviation agreements the agency may have entered into with affected taxing agencies. Until such time as sufficient tax increment funds are assured for bond purposes, an agency would have to rely on loans or advances from the City, loans from other sources, or proceed on a "pay-as-you-go" basis from each year's annual tax increment allocation. C.. Estimated Project Costs The primary purpose of the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelop- ment Project is to protect a portion of the City by eliminating the conditions of blight in the Project Area as evidenced by the condi- tions described in Part II of this Report to City Council, consisting chiefly of the existence of inadequate flood control public improvements and facilities. The Agency proposes to eliminate such conditions by providing, or assisting . in the provisions of, some or all of the public improvements and facilities projects listed in Table III-1.- The public .improvements and facilities projects identified on Table III-1 have an estimated local cost of $19,768,000. This prelimi- nary cost estimate includes a 15 percent contingency and escalation factor. The projects are not listed in order of priority, nor is the listing,. which is also set. forth in the proposed Redevelopment Plan, intended o be a limitation on. the Agency's authority or methods in implementing .the Plan. Furthermore, because of the preliminary nature of the cost estimates, the uncertainty of other. potential funding sources, and the Agency's current inability to establish firm priorities among the various projects, the listing does not assure that such proj- ects can or will be financed in whole or in part by tax increment reve- nues.. Improvement project priorities and specific engineering and design solutions will be determined by the Agency and City Council on the basis of more detailed studies of Project Area conditions and needs and a more comprehensive examination of funding requirements and resources. These studies will be undertaken when and as other related plans and actions begin to crystalize. The Agency's ability to provide for such projects will be largely determined by the amount of tax incre- ment revenues generated by the redevelopment process, by the availa- bility and levels of other funding sources, and by the extent to which the orange County Flood Control District is able, through its funding mechanisms, to assist in addressing the essentially regional flood control problems affecting the Project Area. No improvement projects Will be undertaken for which full funding, from whatever sources, is not assured. Nevertheless, the completion of any of the proposed projects will result in a significant health and safety benefit to the Project. Area and the City, irrespective of whether all such proposed projects are completed. Katz HulIis i In addition to the flood control public improvements and facili- ties project costs estimated in Table III-1, the Agency may incur annual administrative costs for staff and consultant services, and may incur other costs for Project implementation purposes as permitted by the Re- development Plan•, including the setting aside of up to 20 percent of all tax increment funds received into a low and moderate income . housing fund. ' Because of the limited purposes for which the Project . will be undertaken - elimination of flood control problems - the Agency's esti- mated Project costs are likewise limited to only those costs related to such, purposes and to the required low and moderate income housing -set asides. ' The total estimated cost for these activities, as shown on. Table III-2, is $25,200,000.- D. Proposed Financing Method Nominal advances for early survey• and• planning activities, and Project administration have come and .will continue to come from the City until Agency' working capital from tax increments or other available sources is available. The Agency may agree to repay such loans and ad- vances from the. City, including simple interest thereon. The Agency and City may enter into agreements under which the City would assist the Agency to provide public improvements and facilities projects, including those listed in Table; III-1, or to accomplish other Project purposes. Agency bonds or tax anticipation notes mayt be issued if needed and. fea- sible to finance all. or any portion of Project costs. The proposed Redevelopment Plan limits the amount of tax incre- ment dollars. which may be allocated to the Agency, to a cumulative. total of $80,500,000,- which includes debt service on any bonds, notes, or other indebtedness the Agency may issue or incur or interest bearing reimbursement agreements the Agency may enter into. The proposed. Plan limits the principal amount of Agency bonded indebtedness which As to be repaid in whole or in part . from tax increment funds to a total of $25,200,000 outstanding at any one time. The Agency recognizes that the estimated cost of. the proposed flood control public improvements and facilities projects shown .on Table III-1 and total Project costs shown on Table III-2 exceed the amount of tax increment revenues likely to be generated from the Project Area. Tax increment revenues are therefore considered as- only one of several sources - of funds which would be used by the Agency and the City is alle- viating the flooding and flood%. control problems. existing. within the Project Area. All potential revenue sources will. be analyzed and used as available, including annual capital improvement appropriations from the City as well -as from the Orange County Flood Control District. The Agency's and City's goal is to effectively address a critical need as quickly as possible within existing funding constraints and potential funding capabilities. (III-4) 101084 m ONMC1 KatzHollis Table III-1 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES PfWB= CGSTS Portion Proposed Estimated for Project Funding Total Cost Am unt Percent SICRM DRAINS Installation of additional storm drains to cor- rect deficiencies and increase capacity at the following locations: — At the Adam pump station, a 60-inch storm drain to parallel the existing pipe from the pump station to Bushard Street in Adams Avenue (Drainage District 7B) $ 344,000 $ 344,000 100% — At the Banning punp station, a 54-inch storm drain in Banning Avenue and a 42- inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to • parallel the existing pipes (Drainage District 7C) . 410,000 410,000 100% — In the vicinity of the Atlanta pump sta- tion, a network of drains including a 30- inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1,600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/ Delaware and Elmira/Delaware area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach Boulevard (Drainage District 8B) 1,255,000 1,255,000 100% — At the Indianapolis pump station, a 54- inch storm drain to parallel the existing storm drain from the pump station to Bushard Street (Drainage District 7F) 406,000 406,000 100% In the vicinity of the Fountain valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains includ- ing an 84-inch storm drain from the chan- nel to Brookhurst Street where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2,000 feet then branches north and south with 24- inch storm drains (Drainage District ) 1,227,000 1,227,000 100% • Subtotal - Storm Drains $3,642,000 $3,642,000 (continued on next page) Katz Hol l is Table III-1, Page 2 Portion Proposed Estimated for Project Funding Total Cost Amount Percent PUMP STATIONS Correction of deficiencies in the following City- owned pump stations: Flounder punp station, 9731 Flounder Lane - major modification to pump station and incoming line $2,000,000 .$2,000,000 100% Indianapolis pump station, 9221 Indiana- polis Avenue - replacement of two small engines and pumps with larger units 500,000 500,060 100% -- Newland pump station, 8612 Hamilton Ave- nue - construct additional building with two pumps 1,000,000 1,000,000 100% Adams pump station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - replace two engines 500,000 500,000 100% Yorktown pump station, 9211 Yorktown Ave- nue - replace one pump and engine 250,000 250,000 100% Atlanta pump station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue • - add sump pump 3,000 3,000 100% Subtotal - Pump Stations $4,253,000 $4,253,000 . DRAINAGE CSMEIS Correction of deficiencies in the system of County--awned drainage channels through widening, deepening and concrete lining and including con- $28,865,000 $ 7,216,000 25% struction of one or more water retarding basins, to to- depending upon alignment selected 37,179,000 9,295,000 25% $36,760,000 $15,111,000 41.1% to to Subtotal - All Projects $45,074,000 $17,190,000 38.1% $ 2,267,000 to Plus: Contingencies, Escalation (150 .$ 2,578,000 $17.378,000 to TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS - ALL PROJECTS $19,768,000 Note: Amounts shown are estimates only and are subject to change. This listing of projects is set forth for planning purposes, and shall not be deemed a limitation on the Agen- • cy's authority to inplement the Redevelopment Plan. 101084 mmJNMCl Katz Hol l is Table III-2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects (Table III-1, larger figure) $19,768,000 Administration (10 years at $25,000, plus 10 years at $15,000) 400,000 Subtotal $20,168,000 Plus: Low and Moderate Income Housing (20% of total below) 5,042,000 • TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS $25,210,000 Round to: $25,200,000 ------------ Note: The above estimated Project costs do not include amounts for pay- ments to affected taxing agencies, if any, for alleviations of fiscal detriment. Katz I iol 1 is I I I Huntington Brach 11-&ve l opmen t Agency 'l'a i bier . ('•To I'I„�„I ('nttliy l lledeve l npmcu 1. I'rn jec•1. TAX INCREMENT PIIO.IECTION ASSUMPTIONS l�r a I Vroper'ty Va 1 rcrt inn I nr re:r;e: I'r rtruled v:t 1 urtl inn i nr're:r;,' c-or'rel:tl i.ng Vo Lypical Iuarlcr sec1.ioII growth . from 1981 fit to 1981 85: growth ralrt i:; reduur,d in ruLure years to rpfleck smal.- .Ier valuation up,>n second Ronerntion snIes after the enno men 1. or Propos i t i nn 1 . New 1)ovelopment.: TAP Irillowinq nssumptions with rer;ard Lei the 5eabridge development wrre used in the projection i Phnse [ : ilrtrler emir;Lruch i on are 200 housing units aver ng i ng 15,000 ench wh icft will he fully assessed as of the 1986--87 tax rolls. i Phnsr 11 : Under canstruaLion are 1t0 hurtsing units. averaging $1 1;,000 each which will he !Ally assessed on the 1986-8 7 I nx � rolls; another 120 units at the. .same price is ant.i_rip:rtrd 1n he tf i n r:ons l r uct i nn in I ah- I:1S{5 :tad I,c� fn 1.I y n sr ssed a.s of I he I'liW Ful tax r•o I I s. I i Phase I I l : P lannlyd rleVe I opnn:nl- of' A34 hoer!;i nS; $97,500 each which is anticipated to begin cons Lruc l i nn Intel' (his year aid be fu I 1 v assessed as or the 1986-87 tax rn l I s. Base Year Va 1 ue: T'he 19HI H5 value for a typical quartrr src-- t.ion was factored to determine an estimate of total Project base year value: this racior• represents the ratio or the typical quarter Section acrenVe with that or the entire Project area I OS public apace and the phrtion of the Senbridgr development shown as vacant. on Ci l y maps. Tax It:atrs: The neural 1SIt11 H5 rate, reduced by 10% or thr r>v� r r i.dct rate ror each year 1 hrrea f Ler. u Katz Hopis IRSTIMST,74 BEA04 MEAIOPMEXI ASM ta144o TALBOT BAP FLM CWTRM REDEVE ZWP PROIER s40v95 ES71AATE OF INDMI FAL TAT RVAM1ETi 100984 !000's oeeittNl * City4S rEr IE9L (IrAEeT Contribution Prior Year Real Total Project Less Iase Year Increeentel 201 lbnsinq Met In Fiscal Year 1041 !Increase Prior leer Prior 1 1021 Addt'l, Total V4lee o4 537,470 Tu Rate Tax Rnenues Set Aside Increft"t to Project 1984-85 I/A 1/4 N/A N/A 537,420 I/A 4/4 N/A I/A I/A N/A 1995-86 U7,420 572,744 M/A 1/4 29,786 29,186 602,530 65,110 1.090624 710 142 5" 127,800 1996-87 572,744 607,1" 27,786 30,382 26,542 56,774 664,033 126,613 1.079243 I,366 273 I'M 245,880 1937-88 01,109 640,500 58,924 n.A2 9.56E 67,610 709,130 170,710 1.067377 1,023 365 1,458 328,140 19E9-99 640,500 672,525 67,630 68.983 2.760 71,743 744,269 206,819 1.0-56496 2,195 437 1,74a 393,300 1919-90 677,523 702,799 71,743 73,179 0 73,178 775,966 738,546 1.045120 2,473 499 1,994 448,740 I"O-91 702,739 130,9% R,178 74,641 0 74,641 305.541 269,121 1.033744 2,T77 554 2,217 498,960 :991 92 730,9M 760,136 74,641 76,134 76,13 4 836,270 299.850 1.022368 3,053 611 2,444 549,900 1992-91 760,116 1",542 76,1'4 n,657 0 17,657 me,198 330,773 1.010992 3,344 661 2,675 601,920 1993 94 790,542 322,163 T7,657 79,710 0 79,210 901,373 163.953 . 1.000000 3,640 723 2.912 655,200 1994-75 322,163 855,050 79,210 80,794 0 80,774 935.814 398,474 1.000000 3,984 797 3,187 717,120 1995-96 en,050 894,977 80,774 82.410 0 82,410 967,387 429,967 1.000000 4,300 960 3,00 774,000 IN-" 884,917 911,126 92,410 84,058 0 94,058 9",584 453,164 1.000000 4,582 116 3,665 824,760 I997-98 911,526 934,314 84,058 85.T39 0 35.739 1.070,053 437.633 !.NOW 4.826 965 3,a61 868,680 1999-99 9341314 953.No 35,737 97,454 0 a1,454 1,040,454 503.034 1.000M0 5,030 1,006 4,024 905,400 1499-torso 753.000 972,060 97,454 RI,70S 0 89,205 1,061,264 523,344 1.000000 5,23E 1,048 4,191 942,840 2000-01 772,050 971,502 a9,203 90,987 0 90,907 1,007,499 545,069 1.0%000 5,451 1,090 4,361 98.1,180 2001-02 991.502 1,011,332 90,997 92,907 0 92,807 1,104,139 366,711 1.000000 5,MI 1,133 4,534 1,020,060 2007-03 1,011,332 1,031,558 92,907 94,663 0 94,663 1,126,271 588,801 1.000000 S,BaB 1,170 4,710 1,059,840 2003-04 1,031,5,2 I'm,199 94,663 16,SU 0 96,556 1,148,746 611,I26 1.000000 6,113 1,223 4,891 1,100,340 2004-05 1,052,189 1,073,233 96,556 981481 0 19,487 1,171,721 634,301 1.000000 6.343 1,269 5,074 1,141,740 TOTAL 63,049 14,185,800 * Data generated by City of Huntington Beach, ""' Katz Hollis HANTIr6TOf KAQ REOEVELOP'E1fT A911C7 11at8rscA TALIERT W TL0D1 CONTROL RDEVELIfr WI PROJECT AIL36 SC}IMU OF WV NVELD"M 100394 xmOPFr SCDPE 1 PER TOTAL VALUE 1984-0 1993-% 1486-87 1987-H 17" 1989-" I910-91 MAN 1 2%volts 113,000 23,000 3,320 11,040 6,440 ' Maw 11 A 90 wits 113,000 9,200 2,208 3,132 1,840 Mist II 1 120 units 113,000 13,800 3,312 7,729 2,764 P1aw III A 114 grits 97,300 11,111 2,001 6,447 2,669 Mari 111 1 I30 snits 17,300 22,473 3,364 10,091 8,770 10,894 20 ?6 26,342 V,w 2,769 0 0 TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOVEMBER 1984 (0132D) TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.3 Project Area Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.5 Duration of the Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OB7 ECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS . . . 3 2.1 General Objectives of the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation and Moving of Public • Structures and Facilities 4 2.3.1 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Public Structures and Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3.2 Moving of Public Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4 Acquisition of Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.1 Eminent Domain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.2 Property Owned by Public Bodies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4.3 Personal Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 5 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Building Site Preparation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property . . . . . 6 • (0132D) TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D) 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1 Cooperation with City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2 Cooperation with other PublicJ urisdictions. . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4 General Development and Public Improvement Standards and Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.4.1 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5 Methods for Project Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.5.2 Tax Increments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 10 • 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.5.4 Loans and Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.5.6 Financing Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A Project Area Maps Exhibit B Legal Description Exhibit C List of Proposed Flood Contol Improvements Exhibit D Map of Proposed Flood Control Improvements Exhibit E Map of General Plan Land Uses Exhibit F Distribution of General Plan Land Use Types • (0132D) TALBERT GAP FLOOD CONTROL • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General The City of Huntington Beach lies at the base of the Santa Ana River floodplain. This floodplain has been identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers as the "greatest flood threat west of the Mississippi River." The Santa Ana River Channel originates at Prado Reservoir in Riverside County and terminates at the Pacific Ocean in Huntington Beach. A federal project for improving the Santa Ana River Channel has been in the planning stages for nearly 20 years. When the project is approved, Huntington Beach and the other affected cities and counties will be responsible for providing much of the funding. Apart from the Santa Ana River Channel, the City also utilizes an interlocking system of flood control channels and pumping stations which are distributed throughout the City. During the winter storms of 1983, it became apparent that the existing flood control system is inadequate to protect the City from flooding. Flood control channel failures in several locations resulted in the flooding of homes and streets in the City. Analysis of the cause of the channel failures has revealed the need for substantial improvements to several components of the flood control system. The areas where • needed improvements are necessary have been included within the Project Area boundaries.. The City's adopted General Plan contains policies for maintaining and improving flood control in the City. This Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project was prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety Code, Section 33000. et seg., the California Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Talbert Gap Flood Control Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council and as thereafter amended. This Redevelopment Plan is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1984. 1.2 Definitions The following definitions will govern in the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise indicated in the text. "Agency" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington Beach, California or any successor in interest. "City„ means the City of Huntington Beach, California. • "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "County" means the County of Orange, California. (0132D) -1- "Flood Control Improvements" means improving flow and capacity along existing flood control channels; rehabilitating pump stations, storm drains and bridge culverts; and • i creating retention basins as set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "C," and list of improvements attached hereto as Exhibit "D." "Legal Description" means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared in accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". "Map„ means the Project Area Map for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." "Person" means any individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Privately-Owned Real Property" means real property owned by some person or entity other than a. governmental or other public agency. "Project" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Project Area" means the area included within the boundaries of the Talbert Gap Flood i Control Redevelopment Project Area .as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "B." "Public Facilities" means any facilities owned by a public agency. "Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et seq.), as amended to date. "State" means the State of California. "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency in the manner provided by Sections 33670 to 33677, inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Law and Article XVI, Section 16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project .Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The legal description of the Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency . and/or the City. (0132D) -2- The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such • remedies may include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In additioh, any recorded provisions which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run in perpetuity and except for repayment of indebtedness (which repayment may extend beyond the life of the plan), the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the Provisions of other.documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 20 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council: 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OB]ECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Objectives of the Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and in particular those areas within the City which have become blighted because of deterioration, disuse, and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area. Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: -- Providing a safe and sanitary environment for the existing and future housing stock within the City of Huntington Beach. -- Assisting the County to mitigate a flood hazard which affects the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, "social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. -- Assisting the County to provide adequate public improvements, public facilities and utilities in the form of a flood control system which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. -- Assisting the County to implement the construction of adequate flood control facilities to ensure proper vehicular and pedestrian access within and around the Project Area during periods of heavy rain. -- Establishing other flood control facilities within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices. • -- Providing a procedural and financial mechanism by which the Agency can assist, complement and coordinate revitalization and enhancement of the community. (0132D) -3- • -- Eliminating existing blighted conditions and the prevention of recurring blight in and about the Project Area. -- Encouraging community involvement and citizen participation in the adoption of policies, programs and projects so as to ensure that the Redevelopment Plan is implemented in accordance with the objectives and goals of the General Plan. -- Encouraging the coordination, cooperation and assistance of other local agencies as may be deemed necessary, to ensure that projects undertaken by this Agency are implemented to their fullest and practical extent. -- Other actions as appropriate, including but not limited to, actions to assist in the rehabilitation of flood channels and related facilities, and the encouragement of coordination and cooperation among local implementing agencies and residents. To achieve the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency is authorized to undertake the following implementing actions: -- Development of adequate public improvements and facilties. -- Demolition, clearance and site preparation of publically-owned property. -- Assist in providing financing for flood control improvements in the Project Area. 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants The Agency acknowledges the requirements of California Redevelopment Law, Sections 33339 and 33339.5. However, they are not applicable in this project because the construction of flood control improvements within the Project Area will not result in the need for participation of owners and tenants. 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation and Moving of Public Structures and Facilities 2.3.1 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Public Structures and Facilities The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve or to cause to be rehabilitated any publically-owned building, structure or facility in the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized and directed to encourage in the rehabilitation of property in the Project Area not owned or acquired by the Agency. • (0132D) -4- 2.3.2 Moving of Public Structures As is necessary in carrying out this Plan and where it is economically feasible . to do so, the Agency is authorized in its discretion to move or cause to be moved any publically-owned structure, building or facility which can be rehabilitated to -a location within or outside the Project Area and dispose of such structures in conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2.4 Acquisition of Property Except as specifically exempted herein, the Agency may, but is not required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase or any other lawful method. 2.4.1 Eminent Domain The Agency shell not use eminent domain to acquire any privately-owned real or personal property. 2.4.2 Property Owned By Public-Bodies The Agency is not authorized by law to acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. 2.4.3 Personal Property Personal property shall not be acquired by the Agency. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants The Agency acknowledges that as a Public Agency, it is bound by California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Section 7250 et seq ). However, it is not applicable in this project because the construction of flood improvements within the Project Area will not result in any displacement. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Site Preparation Except for privately-owned real property, the Agency is authorized to demolish and clear or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property in the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or cause to be installed and constructed, temporary public improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public improvements may include but are not limited to traffic signals, streets, flood control facilities, and utilities. Temporary utilities may be installed above ground. The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or pay all or part of the value of, or to cause to be installed and constructed with the consent of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the public improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the Plan and to pay for part or all of the value therefore, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and (2) no other reasonable means of financing such (0132D) -5- public improvements are available to the Community. Such public improvements may include, but are not limited to, recreational improvements, landscaping, utility undergrounding, pedestrian walkways, over or under passes, bridges, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, flood control improvements, traffic signals, electrical distribution systems, water distribution systems, parks and playgrounds. Specifically, the Agency may pay for, install or construct, and may acquire or pay for the land required therefore, the facilities, buildings, and structures set forth in Exhibit "D" Proposed Flood Control Improvements, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Agency is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property in the Project Area owned by the Agency. When the value of such land or the cost of the installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both has been or will be, paid or provided for initially by the City .or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both by periodic payments over a period of years. If in implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the.Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, in accordance with all-of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for. Uses in Accordance with this Plan - - - - - - - - - - For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of Agency-owned real property within the Project Area by leases, trades, or sales by negotiation without public bidding. The foregoing shall be controlled by the limitations contained in Section 2.4 of this Plan. All real property acquired by the Agency in the Project shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted in the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. For property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency, an annual report concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of Agnecy property for speculative purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. (0132D) -6- • All purchasers or lessees of Agency property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or, conveyed by the Agency shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All Agency property in the Project Area is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital .status, national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. As required by State and Federal law, all property sold, leased, or conveyed, shall be made expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses. • To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement within the Project Area for itself or for any public body or entity to the extent that such improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development in the Project Area is proceeding in accordance with disposition and development documents and time schedules. For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of real property owned by the Agency except property conveyed to it by the City of Huntington Beach. 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Cooperation with City Subject to the limitations of this Plan and any limitation in law, the City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City shall include but are not necessarily limited to the following: -- If necessary, institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, • and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way within the Project Area. Such action by the City may include the (0132D) -7- abandonment and relocation of public utilities in the public rights-of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. • -- Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements in publicly-owned public utilities and community facilities within or affecting the Project Area. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. -- Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. -- . Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of all conceptual plans and substantial amendments to said plans pertaining to new development, and flood control improvements in the Project Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to any required application approval by the City. -- The City is authorized, but not obligated to provide and expend funds to ensure the completion of the project as a whole in accordance with this Plan. The obligation of the City to perform the actions indicated • in this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described in Section 1.4 hereof, be contingent upon the continued availability of funding for this project primarily from tax increment revenues as defined in Method for Financing herein. In the event that such funds, at any time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this project, the obligation of the City shall thereafter be limited to providing assistance in the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead costs in connection with the termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced pursuant to this Plan. -- The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project. 3.2 Cooperation with Other PublicJ urisdictions Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, is not authorized to acquire real property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the • cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. The Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in the Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or (0132D) -8- leases property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner and tenant participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. The Agency may enter into .agreements with the County of Orange, pursuant to which the County shall construct flood control improvements for the benefit of the Agency, and the Agency will make payment therefore to the County. The obligation of the Agency to make such payment to the County shall be deemed to constitute indebtedness within the meaning of Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code. During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its disposition for redevelopment. 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those residential, commercial, industrial, and public uses illustrated, as amended from time to time, in the General Plan of the City. Those land use designations of property within the Project Area are attached hereto as Exhibit E. The distribution of general land uses by percentage of the Project Area occupied is depicted in Exhibit F. Refer to the General Plan as now in ,effect, a copy of. which is on file with the City Clerk at 2000 Main Street in Huntington Beach and is available by reference. . -- Public Uses, Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way and Easements The flood channel rights-of-way, principal streets and other public rights-of-way that may require improvements as proposed for the Project Area are illustrated in Exhibit C and listed in Exhibit D. Flood channel rights-of-way, streets and other rights-of-.way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper flood control design, development, circulation, and access. Additional public rights-of-way streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency and the City within or outside the Project Area as needed for proper flood control design, circulation and access, provided property to be acquired is not privately-owned, unless such owner requests in writing such acquisition. -- Semi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses The Agency is authorized, subject to the limitations established in Section 2.4 of this Plan, to permit the establishment or enlargement of public, semi-public, institutional, or nonprofit uses, including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, fraternal, employee institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, if allowed by the Agency, shall conform so far as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses in the specific area involved. The Agency shall impose such other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. 3.4 General Development and Public Improvement Standards and Requirements 10 All real property shall be . developed and rehabilitated in conformance with all applicable state and local laws, fire, building,. housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach as they presently exist or may hereinafter be amended. (0132D) -9- 3.4.1 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment •of property in the Project Area. 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, if it deems appropriate, is authorized to finance this project with assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, property tax increments, interest revenue, income revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, the lease of Agency-owned property, the sale of Agency-owned property, or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. The City may supply advances and expend money as'-necessary to assist the Agency in carrying out this project. Such assistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 3.5.2 Tax Increments Tax increment financing 'may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project assessed valuation base will be established in accordance with state law as described herein. Any tax increments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the increment by itself or from the sale of tax allocation bonds allows. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows: -- That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property in the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid . (For the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory is annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange last equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed "valuation of the taxable property in the project on said effective date). (0132D) -10- -- That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of amount discussed in preceeding paragraph shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, this redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. -- That portion of taxes discussed in the preceeding paragraph are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the incurring of any indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or in part the Talbert Gap Flood Control Redevelopment Project. -- The Agency is authorized to incur indebtedness and to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and bonded indebtedness contained in .this Subsection. 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes The Agency may issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be issued only after the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, available to repay principal and interest when due and payable. In any case, the issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds nor property owners within the project area are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for them, nor in any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 3.5.4 Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the United States, or any other 'public or private source will be utilized, if available, as the Agency deems appropriate to its corporate purposes. (0132D) -11- 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may, but is .not required to, in any year during which it owns property in a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exempt, an amount of money in lieu of taxes. The Agency may also, but is not required to, pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which in the Agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the project. 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.1, and 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: a) $25,200,000 ($20,168,000 for proposed improvements and $5,042,000 for low and moderate income housing) for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan; b) Any amounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and c) Any amounts deposited by. the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and families of very low, low or moderate income. -- The time limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be twenty years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. No loans, advances or indebtedness to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the beforementioned Section 33670 shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond such time limitation unless such time limit is extended by amendment of this plan. -- Except by amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness to be repaid in whole or in part by the Agency if it chooses to sell bonds, which is within its powers, from the allocation of taxes to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall. not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: (0132D) -12- • a) $80,500,000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, including the cost of improvements, cost of providing required low and moderate income housing (twenty percent of tax increment received for Plan implementation to the Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law) and debt service; .b) And additional amounts paid: 1. By the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan. to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project; and 2. Twenty percent of the amount paid to any taxing agency (set forth in Section 1. above) for Low and Moderate Income Housing (Health and Safety Code Section 41056). -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined • in Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low income households as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: -- That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income or very low income households; or -- That some stated percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to meet such housing need; or -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or in. combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of • implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. (0132D) -13- • EXHIBIT A PRO ECT AREA MAPS • (0132D) F ZONING INDEX MAP 9-5-11 10-5-11 DM 9 DI I LEGEND \-'lCt 19-6-10•SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 16- II 15- -II 11124- 6-11DM18 D 17 IS .11 DM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 iL24-5-I 19-5-II -S-II21- -II 22 -II 2 -5-DM DM21 Dr D 4 D 25 S DM 27//30-5-11 29-5-II 2 't-1 27- -II 2 -5-IIAM 35 DM34 %DNJ33 D 32 M31 D 0 `tt 33-5-11 �'` 3+i^ -11 35-5-II 3 ,5-11 DM 36 DM 37 38 39 40 5-6-II �l - 3-6-III ''::: '8' :;:;:;:: 546-10 DM4DM3 2 ` : f` I6 DM 9-6-11 0- II- -11 'S-II I' ::: :; ' -10 8-6-10 DM 10 DM DIM 12 "(ice: -10 17-6-10 inF MI Z':`•:; r.»:; .. :::::<:::3'l ZO d DM 19 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 24-6-I .... OM 29 D b .000rcu...cM m.nv r�nwva wv.mvox aao�uraw crtr cauwca-atpwwa•o.u� VINICITY� MAP 's N '�• l4 ,\ � r tllll IIM 11 1 M •d � �•�� r p�■1u1■■� � - r Q r •�1 w= ri fIL INC J „111�11 111 111 _ - 111�I■n=�■1�11•�r��� C �• �.- OwMtlO\ . '■!S � no war 8' ��a��T•n .}u��w ..., ;, � _ .�/n�-•Z r. '• p' -I=- tllmtl uw 1 I■. `Ii Ia11..■ 1 on � �. aI H =- � I ;I llli 11 ll '•' ��° .� �� �" IIINN# - o n � �18h . I II�i���,►�*� I��1111111 it 1�1, �_n��� � �. , ,�11 ly; 1,1=�I 1111 it ii 11 r-�' p I��I�` MI I�AI11li il�'l�i. 1Y� _ "• „w � , �' � _ I • • a w nn� �"� • 4 �� I \`p�'..I,i iIJ ii■11�.� O M. ..•w■s■a wlww. - MOS �,� • . I I i0Y -Ilp � p�nn■iiu s' _ I II II I� �i li li Imam `r n c �r v,61■1�■1�' r , p . �. I I I\ -�11li � � �.-.• - .� �:•. ,. � 'i � .1.1�■I � 1 arwwlYN1 ;m.. �rOI/�.X� 1�la _ r�? _ � _ __.Il. ��w-.�M■IpY'IIInIt1, 'x 3��a e°a I - C - !emu■-uu■uln��=��vSZv9l�fl r -IM■ Na w 1■1■,phi Mmmil S�If i IIIY/1!- loll-1�'/l � �duly.- i�liui _ Y:�liiii■1 \9 � w•••nw■Iw�. 'pm■ � . IIII����1�I ■ • YI l 4 i P ANNING ZONING DM 40 Iwo SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 36-5-11 ,=.r NOTE- CITY OF :'�,. I^ N.. ADOPTED JUNE 20, 1860 1f.•:L°: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 7TI LEGEND J :.E AMENDED ORD. AMENDED ORD.NO: AI SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE D15TRICT GE]MD9AE-E DISTMCT HUNTINGTON BEACH 6-18-196I 908 2_6_67 1277 5-7-1962 900 S-IS'- 1321 C4 MIONNAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 5-21-1962 903 II-20-67 1381 ® OFFICE PROFESSONAL D15MKT 6-IB-1962 aDa 5-I-67 1316 ® LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1-21-1962 946 II-2-TO 1811 ®_TMO FAMILY RE5IDENCE DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2°_I96, 1051 5-1-72 745 ® P A�NRNE�D70EVFL9PTMEN�WSTRKTI°STRICT 5-16-1864 1058 I I-6-72 1795 ♦-5-1865 1132 1-7-74 1895 O AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 3-21-1975 1975 2-3-15 1960 _ 4-21-1973 1975 5-19-75 1982 E PROMT YARD F STREET LINE 205,237.23".250,297,5M.431,505,546,66-56 vmr-—TE PLAN Or srREET KICjlYENr 7-6-19M 2076 Sig-75 1961 FY,O�STREET 67-10,368,PP 67-I,69-36,71-29,72-27,PP72-7,74-21,73•ZB,74i,T)-6,78-6.76i0,77-25, 6-21-1977 2072 1I-21-1977 2240 =3 30 TALBERT AVENUE 30o RI RI 1- So RI RI C 4 C F—E TRADE.W. cLADrs AVE a (:REST v:<aSI-;W L) RI RI RI w wRI N n SANTANA CR . J j to 70 30 GO RI H L. ; S7 RL ING AVENUE RI �:Ll�PD 1'ti 2•RFro RI RI RI a tl RI_pD °u s MINER AVENUE MINER AV RI RI T-L:.R Dfl LE CONT[ RI Rz >< RI RI RI JRI�D-( s `, RI _ "� .R2 CR.- , R3 R3 RI ; R3 r LESO , •r.] 'Ci4 R3 R R3 •':'626n4r9 IoMmo�a -. _ na. zo S �.... OF h R2 RI ;i RI-PD �RI ' RI RI R2. R2 W R2 __-------- R3--— R G60) - C 4 I R2-10 R3 R R3 J U i R2 R2i R3IAV R3 R3 'R3 MH C4 R2 m R3 W •71v,s;; DR _ 'SD E.P -:R3 -:R3 R3 b R3. 9 RI 'CONSTANTINEE DR , 6 RI R3 z R2 �R2 A T 4 R3 RI Q U3400RI ' 2 R2 a R-I RIRI as R•I _j E GARFIELD r AVENUE 3c 3i i A PLANNING ZONING DM I SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 1 - 6- II NOTE CITY OF COUNTED DUNE 20,1960 'I1M DIME N3 O aEwAY NE CENTER N.r�oE� • CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 770 0�°E or sucH a AMENDED 0RD.MO. AMENDED ORD.NO• LEGEND.� 5-.-61 834 I-20-69 1465 HUNTINGTON BEACH 5-15-61 839 9=7_71 .989 L�SINGLE F4M4Y RESIDENCE DISTRICT 5-7-62 900 9-IS-75 2011 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 10-IS-62 9D2 7 '-75 1989 I�.-.MI]� I-215 942 5-T-79 2368 =E COMMUNITY FACI:.ITIES(EDUCATICNi CISI PICT 6-3-63 969 EF-R COMMU—Y PAC'LITIES(RECREATION)DISTRICT 12-2-63 102I F HIGHw4r CDMMERCI4L ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 6-15-6 1062ESIWNT AL 6-IS-54 1062 R2 COMMUNITY AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 12-�64 1106 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 4-4-66 Ilse SUFFIX LEGEND 122.14 8,150,151,153,164,237,269,285,316,376,372,444,482,66-3,66-32.66-37,66-62, 8-15-66 1243 YJ-3-66 1259 68-44.71-12,74-1875-5.79-5, I-16-67 1290 QO COMBINED 11TH OIL PRODUCTION • ,5_ -'--SETBACK LINE J6 JI 2 , 6 - GARFIELD 1 1 AVE. 640 1 zs RI '� wcK w RI opeRI ; w4vE w RI 1 I MANDEVLLE DR. - 1? R2 PD RI RI RI RI �RI� RI Cl i I > I J RI j J 1 -CLASS ON. + BpOC\:yD^E CDR CD DEAUVILLE OR." I I LAU ' !31 ]]D '-'`----II 1 RI ' RtRl RI RI CT p . !. RI WIRI ICF-� PEN CR 1 RI J wHITESAILS CR. R ^ I I I„ R I 1 RAs ELGf 1 i RI�= CF-E.., I RI RII :RI -.. � ' �J u UP CR 1 �NEEL LUSS `— - DR RI 0 RRJ 00 RI -R�------- ----- --- R I I Pja 1 - I. Y' 1 TOPSIDE a. ..-.�..-.. R:s s R I u':[:::;:.•: -.:�r:l C 4 LMOU H Ow L 2 ss,� - 640' RI RI ( RI OR 1 RI R: J L� 6CpOa� N40.E5 DR Cif—R -a x' CRESCENT DR. I' I= -.RANT OR J;BaTO 1 R I L J(S�UACORALJ� RI �� J RI ' J RI 1 1 R 4C4iVLC0 R. =; l SE45PR4 W ]J RI HIT111.1RR HCYES CR 1 1 RI RI: RI RI � IAMDRST OR • ♦ RI 1 RI la J R I = RI =RIR I 1 1 LORRAINE OR. l 6 BIwIN000 ;`• CR I TYLER CR ; DANBURY CR R ; RI RI _LN. El o jW AT RI RI , RI ' MLERMO IRSIDE OR 5 1 RI .0i� R I POLK CR u Q GILFO RA C 1 R i � R —1g RI 1 RI �l �..._ j ENLOGK Q ENYCN E 09. 5411,PoRT S]0 TO SCC UME °R V - - RI � i RI i RI � RI RI ' RI YORKTOWN L AVE. 11 I R5 NO'Q'WIN1242B'C RI RI RI RI I_--- ° E- FI r-'—_ J„�1 to T I LAKE DR ALBATROSS DR. - 1 200 4a f3� =r RI i RI i RI rRil z R I i 1 I / 3 I + R2 :/��,I RACE CR. PIERRE ANCHOR DR. ORE CR. 1 i j I \" -�-27 •II'26 E �� RI j RI 1 R I R I /�_ r4oE�,} J RL•IIS 0 `-� CR RI -OMPTON OR. luxroxmaL CR. —, — 946 / RI JR RI XCF—E tRI oo RI TIN IXi.Po� LR riL) BREAKERS DR.lr]J64 I / RI �aaj J) 1 RI Q RI � i; — _ C R•400.OQ ! I li ^u^S.wELL J RI 1 "BOI DR DOLPHIN �j OR 1 QI 1 z OSUN CR- ]]D.L�GD. RI RI RI yIRI 1 R I R I RI R I 1 RI /= DOREME RE S§ DR CUTTER DR 1 1 I DR. ; Z ORAL CR. Q 1 ._... J^I�JJ RI 1 RI RI RI 0 1 BANK i DALLAS C. ; I ELLME AD DR i IFF CR.i �1 RI W s a --J RI RI RI RI " f �OAL� DR. IVY CR 1 MOSSPORD OR - 3 i A /J/ RI I j 1 RI RI RI R I CLIPPER R I DR. _ / —J I I�R I 1 f- u LL, R•IO DO' RI FL4YMAN DR. �_ C — — U, ♦ L•37700'\ ' ' � i�g ICI VELVET CF m LARKPORT J ]5203 IW, ," RI 3 R I 4 = pC C Z ,D �i I�RI RI a RI LL� RI a ND•Ir B•w 11 W I 245o0$i dI �` € 0.ARKp4LE DR. 1 LOWMEAD DR vT'j J h v D RIIL 1 RI — __ 1 F-AMS -- - ---- AVE. \ 11fi� 2I7. PLANNING ZONING DM 13 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 12 -6 -II SLALF IN FEET NOT E ADOPTED AUGUST 15,1960 ALL DIMENS4IAS A+E IN FEET �-- CITY OF CITY CQINCIL-ORDINANCE N0.785 Ax N L x O T AMEN9IT COUNCIL AMENDED NO.7 ORD.NU. r *ONE ADJOINING a T OF OR NOIS IA ExDED 0 Ea TEND TO TIECCNTEN z-6-61 814 8-7-72 1767 OF SUCH RIG. r F Au 5-c-6 B- 8-6-73 1862 LEGEND'' 4-61 877 7.7-'.5 1994 5-7-62 9oO 6-E-77 2190 ©�11 w°L1f1Er CaA556rw,rou HIJNTINGTON BEACH i 6? 969 12 -7B 245 u PLANNED FAMILY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1-21-G3 948 3-16-79 2356 n NEGNBORNOOD COMMERCIAL 6-3-63 969 p-3-79 2405 ® SMILE fAM1u RESIDENCE DIsrRlcr 2-3-64 1034 4-5-82 2546 pe COMMUxITY BUSINESS DISTRICT 819 64 1079 T I?---64 11 U6 i-R COMNUNITY FACIL-ES(RECREATIONAL)DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 6_q_65 1145 � N—WAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT II-15=65 Ii SS CF COMMUNITY FACILITIES(EDUCATION)DISTRICT *Nola:Dane—OnS ore OPPIG-Naate 1-3-66 1177 ® RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE and based on In*OpWoVeDsite I-16-67 290 145,161,213. 15, 37.261,30Q 316.394.46I,482,514,531,54n,66-62,66-66 plans. Amo.e specific alan 6-19_67 1330 SUFFIX LEGEND 67-22.70-IO.T-11,71-12,71-34,PP 72-5,73-12,75-04,77-6,78-22,79-1,79-9,81-IS. Will ba sUDOlileD W1tn 1 he 9-18-67 1349 0,-OL hAPI Wool—P. 10-19-70 5U6 •02i0) aL CONJ%-- OBT.- 7-17-71 1659 .....: DENOTES PRIVATE STREETS 9-7-71 1657 -��- SETBACK LINE 1 12-20-71 702 1 ADAMS 1 AVE 1. V , 4 ,_ ,ESEABRIDGE 1 x RI RI 1 SPECIFIC - NpRTnPDR, DN RI c o ' rol n 4 PLAN m RI RI RI 1 RI J RI RI JPAGE CR. 3 1 1 55 RI RI RI B OTHW CR Tn m 117C- RI 1 NANTON C. VISCGUNT� :RIS J RI RI RI RI PR DR SELLS"HE pR J a _1 �a 1 01 RI 1 RI MRLBRIpG CR 1 R RI RI 1 I 1 RI 1 u R 1 ' % R' - BY OR R I NNIGM CR. 1 M . II ••'•C I ^-OIE. Aa 4 aI, w NOR�OLN DR. 1 NELSO DR ' b IL :R1 YS RI N RIEDI E pR 1 WI RI g RI j RI RI a SQUIRES CR. C—ANT f` pR II I I II=1 PENEWBURY ; MASr,, 10 RI RI RI �RI EI NI RI 1 '1 R I A UDR BURLCREST DP LSOUTHPDRT DRY CF—Ra j RI 1 RI 3 RI RI OR N 1 I RI ne jSE1FOCN„ 1 RI _ z D, CF-E "ENTON OR. 1 1 w F s RI RI RI 1 NAg4( RI RI RI 1 Z I Z SEA FORT pR-J ; -E OR. RI J BE-EL DR. ` NIL J RI II IC2I Qa3gI.G RI RI z 1 RI J 1 1 ICJ c 3 MONSTER DR ; RI TRU%TON DR, RI RI mR1 RI 1 W CF R �4,Cgr a RI e�4� �� 1 RI RI V RI RI o Wm-:.E RI VI rrp::.f1 °q� RI II BA,6 ALLOY ; DR 1 s f RI RI I I 'r R1 To T R 1 R I ,'_, R I 1 CRARFORD pR. Bg1xFORpa nR RI ag a RI RI RI j RI RI RI AVE II INDIANAPOLIS 1 7. I RI RI RI -�� RI "i CI _ DRIFTWOOD R I RI REILLY DR 1 ` �}� _ ,yVJ..'� .:._L ............ Ze ` C F-E J RI 1 `R R I R I TERN CR 1 R I + -L 'lbw-- I irlk SAIL a+- RI 1 mus'_P`.; `' �•-- " :d- L�D:r4'. RI RI RI R 1 RI HERON CR •- _ ti MERMAID C RI 1 '' �f,.f•-'" S% �, Y W 1 ^� R 1 ___.. < O CRANE CR 1 es w s9 4 t - � w i rcR R I °P W y 1 _ n R I • R I 1EINGFISNER fv _^ 1 ,-,--; :.> +� (• �` z RI S ) II R I 1 1 MARY CR ,ARAS CR I R I i; — - -'- 's•'.: '% '-u j R 1 ° RI RI RI R111 - �I v RI SEABIRD CR ANADO DR I •-�!:- d RI RI z UER p R l RI R1 —-= R2-PD H < EVELYN CR; :A LI.TH p^ .-...• • •:�'", I-...... '- z ...}1- a ' R I o :. �i t- of RI a ;I RI -'4. -. � � opt NOWBIRD R I .4 - ..----._ EL RI RI `:\ R! �C4 `RI RI RI R - 8' C4 - - - ------------------- ATLANTA AVE PLANNING ZONING DM 12 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 11-6-1I LEGEND: ADOPTED MARCH 7.196D CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.759 • AMENDED CASE MONO AMENDED-SE OR- ® QUALIFIED CLASSFlCATM CITY 3 19 I T56 8 5-H ] I93 �••-0.DTOWN SPECIFIC RAN 6.19-61 �-/. ei] 6-J-75 T57 we ® MOBILEHOME DISTRICT -6-61 .1 676 B 5-75 Sat=1 �m PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 5-]-6E 237 900 9-f�-7-TOWNIOf2013 10-I-E2 2. 929 2-6FT6 TOMNLOT2021 53 SINGLE FA RESIDENCE DISTRICT 12-3-11 2.1 938 7-6 T6 -3 20B0 DQ] TWO FAMILY'A'RESIOENGE DISTRICT HUNTINGTGN BEACH 5 6J lA2 9� 9-T6 77.2 2III A-1B- 1.7 996 1-J-)7 7623 2152 © LIMITED MULTIPLE FAYILv RESIDENCE gSTR1CT 1-A-65 414 I 1-Mi70.DTDWN201 [J MULTIPLE FA M IV RESIDENCE DISTRICT -IT-66 536 11BO 2-6-78 7120 2269 �J GENERAL BUSINESS 015TR1tT 2.21-66 545 1186 3-7p ]-25 2213 -5-6fi 66-23 1221 12-Ra1 77.20 2211 EEO LIGHT IIAU3TRIAL DISTRICT 10-3-6666-11 1258 2--.]5-.27B89O "19-38I­ET K/19 COMMUNITY FACILITIESIRECREAT IONAL DISTRICT 6 '° ° 2"' COYYUTY iAC14tIE5EOUGTIpALgSTRKT6 67 66 -B 2236 "6161 9-B666URANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 98 677-29 1" 2B275 21 2346 I� OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT -.6 6B32 'J1 5 2209 ® NEIGHBORH00 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 6 7A1.69 69-11 1511 2-1-BO IP711214 4 [G.21 COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT <-0-69 69-13 1515 1-21-RD PP79-12112 [�.] HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -20-70 69J ­27-G-61 .1-5 2195 T-6-70 PPTO-2 15P1 I-21-BOOLDCMYYIIO ® DESIGNATES PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 0-1— TO-K) 606 q-17-83 B3-2A 2WGA 5�1 T95 71 P7TA3 I6�o5•WUi]-93 0 1 28 16966t �m)-5-.D WIT.OIL PR....TIOM 7-6-71 71-" 1655 --- SETBACK LINE -� J G'i-T2 72-3J 179 I COYB1NfD WITH OIL PRODUCTION C2 2-20-73 72-13 1917 11 AREA BOUNDED BY PALM 8-5-71 ]26 1923 ADAMS AVE. ONE NWN OCEANE•VE ENTEON W. L/ l B SEVENTH ST.ON SE. V LJ LJU L—ll_J LJ l I U L_J I I I I I L �• RI-0 1,``�r/___h2�.'�'°�v-•F;yl RI-0 RI RI R-I F R-I R-1 R2 I.OLO g 1 C2___ r R2 LAN _0_-0 NC�aLPEtIFIC� / `Y'L/� •• LOMA AVE PORTLAND JJ AVE I9 s.... ....._:(.1 • : `], Ri _0 0 aognaNp (DISTRICT 2) > A. �; o RI RI RI RI a RI R2 0 _0 r- 65ari o 1-0 1 m evb.• RI.O 8 OSWEGO AVE- AVE. +• R2-PD-IO :y 1 TMIRTEE NTH ST I 5501C I C F E o 0 0 0 = o o f wlAw,.::BF-) 1�1 R I R �Q -0 R2-PO-10.,Si-'-•:, < �, RI RI YiL I� 1 I isn =:R 1.Ii!iCi-I fS� i u NASHVILLE AVE. - ' BT RPERA ECIFIC RI RI7 -0 RICT TWO) I R2-PD Io CF-R MER ,i hA R I R I R I z5 R2-PD-10 ` 1:...K,: _„-:f:.1 HE MEMPHIS v— 1CF-R ELE VENTM r �. 3Oo RI ST � T, o Eo�aol 5 A RI ��N rco v RI HE avE.l R3 C4y RI I'9RO 'EN ED M Do' 1 • 'c9 I R I R 2 sr 5D 1 R 2 R I AVE. �'1 �P_ I yRl a c HNOxVILI_E py I s' =` � D O D S Cl IC n I 1 P I I R3 R3'^ R3 C4 1 TOWN AT SPECIFIC R 2 7Lf�! _�' I_, L N PLAN TREA ONE (SEC IOM•B•) / c I AVE. R3 R2L�.�nIfilfTr�I-�I'�J( � OWLJL-I�-R3 V---AVE, NL'.ANAPO_.;, I��II R 3:PR3 IIIII—�'��� UE I �III'1� III�U u�—I 1�1L�J x. PALM 9 Q� HAHE 3I 1� ti4 r P A a�� ED I L GENEVA OC/Lf f z CIA /Y AVECID LL ELMI� AVE. 50J PECAN AVE ° �� p= M H DETROIT AVE. , HICAGO r9 A iA a'y� R 1 -Z3 •• � \a°y. 20` Lf h Q CHICAGO�o�-AVE 3 �-P 1 Q AN2 ti FIC A� ¢ J ��IIIIIH 3 1 M90 w O Y ' ~Q. m 9 NO •� 4• ••1aL z a I E ..� 31y 1 o W R2-PD, F 2-PD R2-PD as T pLl� BALTIMORE AVE = a:o RZ I N•u-.-._BEatliicABaA-_-_=___.��_ :r . GBr R2-D R2-PD -.:J • F� 3 ••r /'i./ //(9'Y�C/ C/iE• O CPti?O pP' ��# AT LANTA — AVE I o (ono /O //// f9�\••\ d"Q p� SCALE 1N FEET I`Ii NOT F- 1 -L DIMENSIONS ARE IN FLET RIGHT ^ ANY(UNF ADJOINING ANY RIgIT OF WAY `'isSA.• 15 INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER J`// \ OF SUCH RIGHT OF WAY .PLANNING ZONING DM 16 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-6-I I NOTE DIMENSIONS A IN FEET CITY OF : RE NY ZONE DJOINING u pIGNT OF WAY S MTfNDlD 0 E% CENTER ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 of IwcH PIGNT OF WAY, TEHL TO THE CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 794 LEGEND: PgOiESSIOHAL, MOTEL,TgR:LEq PARK DISTRICT AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. rk3l LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH ® COMMUNITY FACILITIES(RECREATIONAL)DISTRICT 6-7-62 900 LS_LI SHORELINE DISTRICT 12-3-62 90 CGS] GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 9-20-65 1156 �CI j NEIGHBORHOOD.COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 3-6-67 1304 HIGHWAY COYYERCIAL DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 6-19-67 1329 COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION 7-3-67 1334 RETa4c% LINE 7-G-7L' 1594 COMBINED WrtH oIL>poDl:^TION AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 6-I•70 SBI ® DESIGNATES PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 237,281,524,66-66,67-13,67-14,PP70-2,PP70-3,70-IC,PP70476-11,77- 2—to-T(. I606 ® TWOFAM:LY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 3"D;79.6,82-6, ^ 52179Y-fB-76 2360i6]3 ® PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 6-7-76 2069 12-19-77 2253 7/I(L PR SE PLAN OF STREET 4UGNMENT !/P• ,� STR EETI-7-60 2409 MOSILE HOME D ISTRICT1B2 2561 ®/ ATLANTA STREETtLo q2 R2-PD I 1Z R3C 'L^oD - m a_'_wrc I 1 a 1 L� �r' - R2-PD i RB-DJ 4±EArU"2-�yR R2-PD 0~ g 1 E,II I 1 / / ^ O MH o 1 1 J RT J l �/ R2-PD yayk� R2-PD i 1 m Q t : / 8 O R2-PD RC R2-PD 1. a - /:,.. m .�4u.o R2-PD 1 9 L- 75 x I _ C -vcq MH R2 PD R2-PD i - •,_i I.3tawrtfZt^__-..� --.sj:aB:iEcitoq-' I MH - 1 MH-0 MH-0 640 Ado CA- R 5 R5 RA MH-0 � x :i.• a OAP \\ C,- I PLANNING ZONING DM 14 ' !� FCTIONAI DISTRICT MAP 13-6-II - -SCALE IN rLl1 ,..� 1 CITY OF DN3 ADOPTED MARCH 7, 1980 TOF,c AOJ IS INT[NDCD i i»[CE+i[R CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 754 oT wc.RICNi oEi WM T LEGEND AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED OR NO. 5:—E FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT —� — ® TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH 03-6-61 794 .-17_67 317 FM RA RESIDENTIAL AGRCULTWAL DISTRICT 3-660 79 6-19-67 1330 -27 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT S-T-62 900 7-I_68 1426 � LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OISTRIC- 6-IB-82 908 9-3-68 1440 Q RESTR6[ED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT 6-5-83 992 1-6-69 1464 � MULTIPLE FANILYN RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA D-7-63 DD7 6-I6 664 (� LIMITEp MULnvIE FAMILY RESIDENCE pSTR¢T I-20-64 1031 3-20-71 1732 [gTJ NIG—COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 2-17-64 1037 6-5-72 I74FI 8., Mo.1L,IO.E DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 3-z-6a 1041 12-19-77 2252 COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION 5-4-64 I056 12-IB-78 23J6 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(CIVIC)DISTRICT 129, 131,237.253,340,360,390.404,402,416,443,464.66-33,66-67,66-66,66-17,68-26.68-43.71-13, 8-16-64 1062 4-7-80 24325 COMMUNITY FACILITIES,RECRE—ONAL)DISTRI:T PP71-3.72-II,77.3"C,78.23,80-2,82-4,82-5,82-6, 6-15 4 1079 7-6-82 2555 ® LIMITED USE DISTRICT 8-1-66 1234 5-17-82 2557 SUFFIX LEGEND: 11-I-82 2581 _---__ DES* TES PRIVATE STREETS -- SETBACK LINE 2\�T 12 7 13 IB 'J � ATLANTA II AVE —� R3 R, R3 R3"- •I" R3 RI 3 6 RI RI RI ��- - �=o II UE IN CR 1 R3 I� J R3 »:.TI[ RI N O 1 L R3 �y R3 "s R3 RI - 1 R 1 RI RM.-- R J I 1 f!0.!1R1RL4N"'a ED S[ -tSD \ OES 3T J BAT TfRF1ELDRRI m ..,•TnenurD r C41 R3 _ 1 R3 Rz X R2 s 3 RI RI 1 N ...A.9a41CIw.... ......_..Dn' .... JENNY OR R 2 - _ Rz J DR R3 R3 „D:F 1 R3 ., K !R2—; I RI J R1 RI �MI/` CREW w.- �; R —9T ..)IonnolD I $ �^"�- w CF-E j C4 1 R3 y"" - o - RI ARCEL CR RI RI RI i 1 R3 RI R3 :' 6 s R1 - R2—;•0 -� 9ASLE RI ...) FRY Rl- s R L Li 1 R3 R3 RI RI gTILWELL WDR 1 "°""["R R3 RI M[N DA _ R I e[•wInYINE.'IS".wInTINE OR J 1 (RI ° RI R4-21 2 R3 a R3I r==STEP i.r .3— RI RI F—R 1 Awao Du .:::u c:-R3t— R3 :�A T�paAo RA RI RI RI C p 1 RI $ 1 1 MIEN[ $' RA-(� M I-A-O R I MI 1 a--------'RI ,,...„..r: _ N/'9 RA U I 1 NAMILTOM Q ml IJ.I I Q �50 Asia MI-A-O MI-A-O ,_ a A 0. C. F C. D. - . '9 �r r r r xe7v2'x•'w 0. LUD-0 - RA-0 9' A•2'n i4 r .1.pper,, R.582'JO v- 1 AIR •Iles ^ 1s'07' N25• W Q n 1 \O 2T0.13 Doti C1 Is, g Frye MH �r N LINE I SE:/ SEC 13-6-1I M2-0 �y o a z M2-0 PACIFIC OCEAN CiC�_yh'Y a:g PLANNING ZONING DM 29 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 24-6-II NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET. CITY OF .NY ZONC AD I. .NY RIGHT OF W- DED TO EXTEND To HE CENTCR ADOPTED MARCH 7, 1980 AY Is INTENDED OF SUCH RIGHT OF .x CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LEGEND ® 5I18LE FAYILx pE lIpENCE DISTRICT AMENDED ORD.N0. AMENDED ORD.N0.ZONE ® INouerRl.L oIlrRlcr NAN HUNTINGTON BEACH �YId RESTRICTED CUTIES(RECING DISTRICT 3.20-61 156,158 826 R! OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT 6-18-62 253 808 COYRINEO WITH OIL PRODUCTION 9-17-77 66.6 2251 12-21-84 83-13 2601 (f��-I COATLIMITED U E DISTRICT DISTRICT 2-21-84 83.13 2681 `J RECREA USE OPEN RIOT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RDS WALIFIED CLASSIFICATION OPENATION DISTRICT L]a aulFp:ocusslFKarloN- x 4 3 13 18 2a 19 M — o� ,��4 MI Ay1 RI l ✓< 2 0 c t 0 RX RI Ckl �jQ`'FC• j 4 (LUD)LIMITED USE DISTRICT co s 9sT U � P L.�y7ir (LUD)LIMITED USE DISTRICT A �C C�`j� yk'r J OC Fq ti II RFFMED IY—HUNNIGYON I NANNIN!": PLANNING 4bNING DM 22 o SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 19-6-10 NOTE' aE_ D 4Ex5.Ox5-RE.x FEET • CITY OF iDNE OTDx:,D .xT DNT . ADOPTED MARCH T.1960sx IN ENOgD o ENrt:No ro rHE c[xrER OF wcx cHT Dr .T CITv COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 LEGEND° 0 SIN LE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AMtNUED (IRD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. R"s OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT NQFA RESTRICTED M4NUFO[TURR4 DISTRICT 6-20-60 774 2-20-73 1818 ® MIONWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT HL�NTINGTON BEACH 2-5-61 BU4 4-17-77 227 ® RESIDENTIAL AM IL 4OESIDENCE DISTRICT . 3-20-6I B26 4-17-78 2278 � TWO 'AMILI RESIDENCE UIRTi.. . 9-3-63 IOOO LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 5-4-64 1055 ® LIMITED USE DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10-4-65 61 4 -67 1168 4-17-67 1317 — SETSACN LINE AMENDED BY ZONE CASE:NO: w-9_To 6G6 0- COMBINED WIT,OIL IIB, 154.155 (59,344,416,527,529,66.6T,70-10,71-1,71-13,71-54,72-46.77-3-' -78-3, 5-3-71 I643 01 COMBINED NRH OIL ' 8-16-71 I664 31B ' 4-3-72 1735 - IB .7 2aI19 9;20 �. � I BANNING 4VE II RI 4]RBLE,E4O LN. _ i 2 l z � i u u �C4 I RI RI- RI Z PLAYA OR J � PDRT CRI R I m R I RI-ol RI-OI D ao I RIRI RI RI o 5 < R RI J/ z RI MOLOK41 DR _( ��'DRI nwsaNC� ♦ A RI R I 5 ` RI RI � R1 LA JOLLA CR. J TIKI CR. JI RI • _ RI RI RI Rlavh j AHITI CR LANAI CR g RI RI RI RI o O O,y LEILANI 00. T`x ; Qr IF RI L�r,xE'� rl GATES—D DR. RI RI (LUD)LIMITED USE DISTRICT RI " ic S� ♦ 0 • MI-A It ♦ • j 4 RP �. R1 O / lO OOr .� ? /O 12 O ` , (LUD) LIMITED co USE o C'A- "sT DISTRICT f 0 Aq o, i I c ti a Q• y u CAI' ' I h L `.A u `M el IV - ,err or� \ ORT•• O C � tik fi�h r C O OO 4 9 OlO �r 19 20 Q 0 3029 OP 20 OCf l PLANNING ZONING DM 20 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 18-6-10 NOTE I I:5 4 ELT CITY OF ADOPTED APRIL 4, 1960 n cu.ZONE OIvlNc,v N.cn�rLor w r ENDEO i0 E"TENLr' i N* Ni EP CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 760 _E,F s_•cl RI..,T CF we :ENC r AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. WALIFIED CLASSIFICATION 1 2-19-62 990 3-6-67 1304 C� LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TRICT ��■—yT■■T TI ■■�\'T�T(�T( 1 lI % 1-7-63 947 5.6-67 1304 I� COMMUNITY FACILITIES IRECREATIDNALIDISTRICT ,�i v���1 11 \\ I ■. lJ l� �J-`� 2-4.63 951 4-17-67 1317 SINGLE FAY0.r RESIDENCE DISTRICT Ll 1 J B-5-63 992 10-2-67 1353 ® ITi14MWFAYYI[oYYERCIALE DISTRICT f I I 1 ( ` I AMENDED ORD NO. 9-I6-634 1043o. . 5-68 14J COMOF'MUNITr4FAC ILIT'ES 1E.UCAT1ONAL I D!ITR ICT It) R A ` `) lJ It I`7 � .13 rl I . 1. A I'l l" o I L ` I A 4_20 4 1048 6,17-68 14J3 � 5-4 4 ID40 6-17-69 :44 I� CIMITEDY TIL4NESB Ll RE 5-4.64 1055 ID-17-A8 Ig40 (� LIMITED MULTIPLE fAMRr RE51pENCE DISTRM:7 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: e•19-64 1079 10-6-69 1529 — SETBACK LINE ,-j'2.:1,_75.-.33R,345,357,409,47u,416,458,516,528,66-1.66-2.66-21.66-42.66-69 1-1 -65 I162 1I-3-69 15 2 ® RESIDENTIAL IL AGRICULTURAL D[iT1ECT 10-IB-65 1162 12-8-69 1542 -0- COMBINED WITH Op. 66-70,66-67.At-23.c7-36,68-4,GB-16,68-27,69-25,69-2% 69-30,69-38,70-25,7I-13,71-I9j5-6, 4_4.66 1195 3-2-70 1556 ..---- OESIGNATES PP—E,STREET 76-2.B0-5, 4-4-66 1197 1-18-71 1622 I I 6-20-66 1216 B-I6-71 1664 7 9 10-3-66 1257 - 8_16-71 1663 10 17 •,•-I/ 11 I 5-5-60 2428 9.15-75 2012 1 ATLANTA 1 I ; g e-13-76 2101 AVENUE I L �- 1 t G ORIExT LH --- i 1 �� RI a RI RI RI RI 'I 1 I �. r W 1 L.L.T aRI �R; RIJ CdNEBRWK OR JRI N t I.f 1 _ 1el - a RI R I ; ORVVV UI+LI:EFIE.D I u 1 RI 1i 'a g x RLAC6R LN C F E g 4 e RI RI 4 RI JRI RI L .e::R ...... a.l b _ ; C F-E I PANACEA OR RAa a EFFINGXAY pR CF-R 14:3H--. X'. 1 f:::::.:•_I .. .. RA-0 I:D:�.::,: R .°5. -I :320 .I R I ; RI EasAe ..I� XSXO E--DRI 11 ;NEVr CHASE DR .._SWi R I ;I.------------ IO TE CARLO CP ;; CORAL CMECRJ - J R RI � R2 R2�,,:A 3Arfl.AmSP;TyEw"T[A1I 'I - - - _ R2RI 1 n BAOOXNI.L"'CR= PEON POINT "D - Y 1 R2 R2 �a RI W R I x RI ;�` 1 W RI RI aRI W BROOKBAY CR 7UNSTAq CRTUT d LO m 0 5 11 RI ---'v C 2 _ _ PEPPERTREE DRIVE RA-0 `RI RI R 5 ------� —. IryXAMILTON AVE R I R I uw —� REWil4 i4 RI r RI- DR I �4-- = C4 - 2 I ..! e/31 g aC 540 nO E I RI RI ; = RI tMWBfAT R2 RI RI RI y 1 J l=l 1 8O°-1E CR. XAITI DR OK CR I RI ° i RI JS R I : RI RI RI RI """° 1 N16UEL R. RI R —RI— RIB RI 01 RI a = ALN CR. ; RI R1 1 R I x i RI I eNDF.L 4 IA CR. n MALANINE DR. ¢I ICR ; 1 R I t R I = RI 1 RIrRI RIRI RI RI R 3R3 RXODESIADRMOKINANA a I I= n 1 _ RI _ I RI RI 0 RMUDA OR — HUDSON DR. I Y aE.KaxsT R3 CF-R„: RI 1 J R I a N LU DR. ON .NaBEE R I J� t N4I CF—E 4 ; 4G°Nf c _ R I fiAMBLER I Al / — MANALO ER RI ; ° RI RI ¢, RI _� � R I iA GULSTRANNO CR I RI yy= J RI X R1 •b 4 ; NAPA4 CR. =O X RI 1 3 R 1 G - OAV TONA CR m - } S Q) M I j Y ALOHA CR „CF-Ri° a RI MG, RID RIB 1 RI RI c BANNING AVE. re E4 19 IV EO PLANNING ZONING DM 7 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 7-6-10 NOTE' OIYEE ADJ ARE Ix 'EEO' ��. 4COPTED AUGUST I5, 960 IS MTENDED°TO En`ExOY i0 THE L[E NI*FK CITY OF GUDH :..T OF WA. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 785 LEGEND AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH 8-6-62 915 20-fib 1453 RESIDEO COMMUNTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT 5-4-64 1035 F2C-69 Ig66 CI NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 6-IS-64 1002 4-6-70 1567 fr cowu:ITr B.swEss lISTR:c• 12-7-64 1106 4-6-70 1568 HIGH WAr CCMNERC:AL DISTRIC- 3-1-65 1123 CASE: 70 617 I_� sCEO'MBBAC:NHE D. W ITH OTIL PRODU CTION 5_I7-65 LI 2-1- 624 COMMUHITr ACIE ( E 9TFICT Co.... OM EDFACILITIES(RECREATIONA DISTRICTORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 12-6-65 166 5-3-7711 66 1% LEGEND:1207 8-IE 4 SUFF 8-I'-66 -IS-7 2342 cESrox4rE<PalvnrE STREETSAMENDED By Y0ZONE 79 25,416,446,462, 2,510,539.66-12.6-34, 6-42,67-I1,67-22 03-66 10-20-80 2457 fi -I - 1 257 6-65.68-35,68-45,69-45,70-3,70-17,70-23,71-4,71-13,76-10,80-12, 567 323 - 9_16.67 1349 9-1B-67 1347 I S B S ADAMS I AVE. ---F -1-L T' I R,Iz RI -- 1 IJ U I RI R RI U) I RI C4 no' ~ 'I C RI RAINIER CR.RI RI RI RI -; _ r y TRI RA 1 F it R I RI RI 9 I RI H. R Ir . _ I i 1 IF - - so• 1 RI i I IF RI RI 1 MEDITERRANEAN DR. NAUTILUS g DR. KINLS CANTON DR. �j RI RI R! I RI - RI DP. l lII ( Cuss-� CANOLEWOGD - DP I - RI l - �-�—ll I MAMMOTH OR. \ I RI RI RI `� 1LJ1: .,.FI � ` RI . ; ¢ R l ti�\R I 'I ' I EL.O.YSTONF °fl .IA IF RI o RI M RI Ji R I 1 AtN76 nl� u u I a z - RI .Fri DR.Q7ZI W CR RI F IRI R� CF—E - 4 R 1 RI R I o R i a 'MD_EY LR E:1:.Ra: .:-:s RI W w PA.;DocK cJ Z. so a ; - I ;-) n.B EOH DR. RI I �_ ¢ z w I J R, a RAG DR HL2ELBROOK W nR I`?gl'M1--� R I ; RI RI z I R I V11 ERDANT DR BIG SUR Dfl.FPw BAr ADOW RI DR RI 8 RI ' RI gV it WVICKSBURG DR. R I RI ;RI RI RI Jz RI zt y R RI WI RI RI RI RI RI RI U L DWH vEN 2 DP IW1HOT SPRING DRRI �� RI " C% �i RI �N IANAPOLIS AVE zo I RI 3 RI D RI RI ?RI I CAIrn NEss J DR CR SR41 fR (RI RI RI u CF-R 8 ' RI aRl T INGHAM DR 1 I ETLAND DR. a DR. RI s R I RI RI CF-E WOFTH IRI RI RI RI I/E LLS� DR. ' e CASTLPWTE DR. `: DUMBRECN Ofl L I JI SPINNAKER DRIVE I3 R I I I RI 1 - RI I I -IR' I RI R I ' IALBANY CR •I NARCdpiT ; NETHEflwAY OR. Y I e� VOS'AGER CIRCLE j RI 1 RI RI RI RI .4=,Ir l al ;. RI a a� RI RI W ( SuuaIWE Dfl. I 'ERSKIxE SPENCER CR \I I CF-R N SILVER STRAND E WI RI � RI 'z 1 RI 3T3.30 ?Fb D RI Q I M UWI WOODCREST DR,IJ , -R—SCOU.._ RI; STAR OR -J I CARROLLTOWN __ D U Z ' R I RI RI J RI ; _F � _ RI RI - Q ; INTEPW000 CR. RI I - u C F—E APWORTH CR JIRI .IYrR I BI [R I RI n LIYMAN(+. ' @, uL� RI DctAnWMD Cw RI i�Jy.,,a4Cx up COMSTOCK DR. IRI 39TTL -PLAND 0= l 1 WI al DP4GC. CR RI NOEYEP D rn PP,.. I. D��J RI RI R' Y 12 WESTCLIFF RI � i RI p RI . RA OR C Cl AT RI p RI RI RI S _ K I � Ib RI FIRESIDE z DR SCOTSTOUN 1 - L� NIrE R DR. I- I--- - �� - -----1---�LJ RI RI 0 RI �_ RI o RI R5 ATLANTA Y I AVE. z 1 IS 1B Is-n PLANNING ZONING DM 6 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 6-6 - 10 AD..E wFEEY NOTE ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF ADOPTED AUGUST IS,1960 zoxE DJOINING ANY RIGHT OF WpY S TENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 785 Di SUCH RIGHT Of WAY �- LEGENDS AMENDED ORD.NO. AMENDED ORD.MO• - =D OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT 5.21-62 903 2-21-66 1167 © HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH 9-6-62 919 7-18-66 1257 ® SINGLE FAMILYMULTIPLE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE 10-1-62 929 10-3-66 1237 R5 LIMITED 1ALTWLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 11-19-62 936 L-3-67 1281 © COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT I-7-63 947 2-6-67 1277 Q TWO FANLY RESIDENCE DISTRICT 4-1-63 958 9-5-67 1345 ® RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3-19-63 996 9 1.68 1349 ® C MMUNITY DISTRICT 8-19-63 996 a-1•68 1400 � cowwuNlrr FACILITIES(EDUCATION)DISTRICT 10-7-63 1007 5-20-68 1412 ® COMMUNITY FACiITIE5(RECREATIONAL)DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 2-s-64 1034 7-15-68 142e 240,256,268,277.280,294,309,311,321,345,346,393.427 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(CIVICS DISTRICT 457,482,496.452,SII,544,66-27,66-42,88-59,66-58 6-1-64 1060 0-4-69 1514 --_; DESIGNATES PRIwTE STREETS 8-19-64 10769 1-4-71 1621 -._ SETBACK LINE 67-20.67-22.68-3,68-6.68-19,69-18.70-6.71-12,70-26.73-11, 12-7-64 1106 9-7-71 1657 2.15-65 - I122 9_1tl-72 1637 6J--� 3-15-65 1082 8-6-73 IB61 SI 3z J 6-21-65 1146 - '•I GARFIELD AVE. -------------- ------------------------�-66ti rr�i RI za.ez RI -.eLENIN RI i ¢ RA 1 1 �I SxERRY CR R I ALBACORE OR 11 /� ) RI RI R{ RI O R1 :Rl�!R5 RI o II N I l 1 WILLXELY CA y BASS DR. I N V W RII" 1 F- ; - RI OO g -_ _ � MH ' R 3 HEATXENTEN CA TCRFIELD DR. R I R I R ILR C2 694E RI 1 1 RI - RI ry �VELARDO VELARDO a I I 1 xroE DR R I R I j 1 0 _ 1 D. C. F. C S ofio x 0 _ _ D. 200 1 1 RI ... .N f\ I1.. 7: R� RA DI I ._......-- ---_.-- _.___..----.. .-_.._ 3 __ _ _--. ................................ --- __ . . _ _ "1 �---------- rzso ' . KREPP DR. FLOUNDER DR I, , z_ 1 w w� RI I W 1 la �C F—E I 2 RONNEY DR. iJ 1 POl K O0. .GPI....DR z z 1 I RI a . .� .:l °IP R I R I I p1 RI RI RI RI MH — 1 1 BL4NE C SAILFISH DR. _I I R' R I w R I � 1 1 A.A. T o+ c j �KARE�jiTARPON ORRI oR GR RI R I R I R I P.I R I C4 - , AIR rI R j RI RI ; RI � 3 d 3 RI «" I YORKTOWN I---------------------- •-�`�------- —1 - 1 RI S RI RI 1 RI VERONICA I. DR. J GREENWICN OR 1 a y AFIELD f. m iHEDERIC IN K 1 RI o X RI j Rla RI � RI a RI RI ' RI 1WARFIELD DP. " .PORTSMOUTH DR. ' IxxsgqucX OX I NOORE cR y 1 RI RI RI RI RI _ RI 1 w00 RI Ix CF-E RI 1 N NANTUCKET DR I E'6 BOND CA ELVA LR ' DLAWN ja R I ' RIRI W a CF-R au, aR[;S:JI-r .1 a RI uADELINE DR I wpRBIInTOF. DR 2 CONSTITUTION DR. LL ¢HYANNIS PORT DR. • o RI RI 1 RI � RIIr RI CF-C I. CAPE COD OR. ' ELNAx Uq 9D Y w TT IN 1 1 RI NORTH LINE SE I/4 EI/4 SEC 6-6-10 a Fi7 C F-E _ _ Z 1 R2 ; YD : 3 ; BICRLCY DR Ic I R�3NI R3 R3 R3 IR�3 I R3 J 1 f,Y itc::',t•:6.....:ii.) G.T.OR. J JJ L J z 1 : 1 R2 x MK Q 1 vETTswooD Dq R3 �"„ L 1 PIONEER R, N65 L_ I - 1 Iszo• ro.J R 2 � S 1 RI RI RI RI RI RI II Rg R3 J R3 6R3 R3 R3 R3 ,,11�R3 xR3^IIR3 xR3 Ifl w GETTYSB(AG DR. RI I Y ?E oil INE.OT Bs TR449)I RI I .LE6 >K Fz ii R3 A. 0 (� . CRAW FORD CR ai i R3 L"�_— R3 R3 IIo m"4 Y`.�' g s o ¢ R3R 1 -R� wN I n C 2 - .w^��,R5 .Kne� 1 I 1 ADAMS AVE. j ; '', i • EXHIBIT B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION • (0132D) Those portions of sections 6, 7, 18 and fractional section 19 in Township 6 South, • Range 10 West and sections 1, 13, 12, 11, 14 and fractional section 24 in Township 6 South, Range 11 West, and section 36 in Township 5 South, Range 11 West in the Rancho Las Bolsas in.the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder-of said County described as follows: Beginning at the centerline .intersection of Garfield Avenue and Magnolia Street, said point being the northwest corner of section 6, Township 6 South, Range 10 West as shown on Tract Map 4304 in Book 1,58, Page 24 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said centerline also.-being the north line of said mentioned section 6, North 890 34' 29" East 2644.52 feet to the north quarter corner of said section 6, said corner also being the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue and Bushard Street as shown on said Tract Map 4304; thence continuing along the north line of section 6 and centerline of Garfield • Avenue North 890 40' 45" East 2637.06 feet to the northeast corner of said section 6, said point also being the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue and Brookhurst Street as shown on Tract Map 4852 in Book 175, Page 23 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the east line of said section 6, said east line also being the centerline of Brookhurst Street, South 0a 38' 52" East 2635.41 feet to the east quarter corner of said section 6, said corner also being the center line intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Brookhurst Street as shown on Tract Map No. 4852; thence along the north line of the southeast one-quarter of said section 6, said north line also being the centerline of Yorktown Avenue, South 890 37' 52" West 2639.36 feet to the center of said section 6, said center being the centerline intersection of Yorktown Avenue and Bushard Street as shown on Tract Map No. 4852; thence along the west line of said mentioned southeast one-quarter, said west line also being the centerline of Bushard Street, South 00 35' 51" East 2639.46 feet to the north quarter corner of section 7, Township 6 South, Range 10 West, said corner also being the centerline intersection of • Bushard Street and Adams Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street South 10 16' 35" West 2640.94 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street, South 00 35' 40" East 2642.45 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street South 00 39' 09" East 2639.52 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Hamilton Avenue; thence continuing along the centerline of Bushard Street South 00 39' 03" East 2640.36 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Banning Avenue; thence along the centerline of Banning Avenue North 890 37' 00" East 1654.32 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Brookhurst Street; thence along the centerline of Brookhurst Street, South 370 39' 25" West 2975.73 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Talbert Channel, thence along said northeasterly right-of-way line South 480 39' 45" East 2021.66 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of O.R. 3575-317; thence South 160 31' 26" West 73.21 feet; thence • South 150 52' 05" West 125.77 to the south right-of-way line of the Talbert Channel; thence North 480 39' 45" West 2037.27 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1000 feet; thence southwesterly along said curve an arc distance of 30± feet; thence North 380 19' 15" West 888.04 feet; thence North 430 03' 20" West 298.21 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of the Huntington Beach Channel being 145 feet in width, said southerly right-of-way line being 62.5 feet south of the channel centerline; thence continuing along said south right-of-way line North 620 48' 03" West 1092.48 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 4862.50 feet; thence continuing along said curve thru a central angle of 170 40' 00" an arc distance of 1499.31 feet; thence North 450 08' 03" West 247.19 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2462.50 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of.44° 30' 59" an arc • distance of 1913.26 feet; thence North 00 37' 04" West 1151 feet; thence westerly 400 feet; thence northerly 200 feet; thence westerly 180 feet; thence southerly 200 feet; • thence westerly 640.41 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Newland Street; thence northerly along the centerline of Newland Street 100± feet to the intersection with the southerly line of the Orange County Flood Control District D1-1 Channel; thence along said southerly. line North 870 42' 24" West 2150± feet to a line parallel with and 110 feet west measured at right angles from the west boundary line of Tract No. 5581; thence North 00 40' 14" West 3200± feet to the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence along the centerline of Atlanta Avenue South 890 37' 06" West 490± feet to the northeast corner of section 14, Township 6 South, Range 11 West; thence along the east line of last said mentioned section 14, South 00 44' 22" West 1320.00 feet to the intersection with the easterly prolongation of the south boundary line of Tract No. 9580; thence along said southerly boundary South 890 43' 00" West 1325.54 feet to the west boundary line of said Tract No. 9580; thence along said west boundary North 00 43' 14" West 1320.00 feet to • the intersection with the centerline intersection of Atlanta Avenue; thence along the centerline of Atlanta Avenue North 890 43' 00" East 40.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Delaware Street; thence along the centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 24" West 55.00 feet to a curve concave to the east having a radius of 1214.63 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 100 54' 30" an arc distance of 231.25 feet to a reverse curve, concave northwesterly having a radius of 1214.63 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 100 54' 30" an arc distance of 231.25 feet; thence continuing along the centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 2.4" West 127.20 feet to a curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 160 48' 3511, an arc distance of 293.38 feet to.a reverse curve concave easterly having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 16a 48' 35" an arc distance of 293.38 feet; thence continuing along the • centerline of Delaware Street North 00 43' 24" West 440 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Frankfort Avenue; thence North 890 18' 25" East 276.76 feet along the . centerline of Frankfort Avenue to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 380.71 feet as shown on a map of the Valley View Tract recorded in Book 5 Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 460 27' 22" an arc distance of 308.68 feet; thence continuing along the centerline North 420 51' 03" East 624.66 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1399.59 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 180 39' 28" an arc distance of 455.76 feet; thence North 240 1 P 35" East 47.54 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue; thence easterly along the centerline of. Indianapolis Avenue 63.00 feet to the intersection with the section line of section 12, Township 6 South, Range 11 West, said intersection being the southwest corner of the northwest one-quarter of said section 12; thence northerly along the west line of said northwest one-quarter 2415± feet; thence easterly 268.00 feet; thence northerly 225.00 feet to the centerline of Adams Avenue; thence along the • centerline of Adams Avenue North 890 48' 32" East 27.00 feet; thence North 00 11' 47" West 169.98 feet; thence North 280 46' 31" East 495.61 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 120.00 feet; thence South 890 20' 06" West 140.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 140.00 feet; thence North 890 20' 06" East 140.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 515.00 feet; thence North 250 54' 00" East 335.41 feet; thence North 00 39' 54" West 960.00 feet to the centerline of Yorktown Avenue; thence along the centerline of Yorktown Avenue North 890 47' 22" East 208.64 feet to the intersection with the Northerly prolongation of the west boundary of Tract No. 7742 as shown on a map recorded in Book 459 Page 50 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said west boundary South 00 12' 38" East 124.28 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 500.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 560 46' 50" an arc distance of 495.48 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 500.00 feet; thence southeasterly along • said curve thru a central angle of 13° 10' 41" an arc distance of 115.00 feet; thence along the radial line to said point South 460 11' 29" West 27.00 feet to a point on a curve concentric to last mentioned curve; thence southeasterly along said concentric curve thru a central angle of 11° 27' 33" an arc distance of 94.80 feet to a reverse curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 527.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 100 50' 02" an arc distance of 99.65 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 23.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve thru a central angle of 83a 48' 25" an arc distance of 33.64 feet to a point of cusp with the northwesterly right-of-way line of Coldwater Lane said point being on a curve . concave southeasterly having a radius of 427.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 180 14' 53" an arc distance of 135.99 feet; thence along the radial to said point South 310 07' 48" East 27.00 feet to a point on the centerline of • Coldwater Lane, said point being a point of reverse curvature said reverse curve being concave to the northwest having a radius of 307.00 feet; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 220 58' 50", an arc distance of 123.13 feet; thence North 350 53' 22" East 45.1.80 feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 400.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 360 06' 0011, an arc distance of 252.03 feet; thence North 00 12' 38" West 71.61 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Yorktown Avenue; thence along the centerline of Yorktown Avenue South 890 33' 30" East 241.40 feet to the centerline of Newhaven Lane as shown on a map of Tract No. 3908 recorded in Book 138 Page 17 of Miscellaneous Maps in.the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Newhaven Avenue, North 00 O1' 00" West 599.76 feet to a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 340.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 20a 07' 44" an arc distance of 119.45 • feet to a point of reverse curvature, a radial line to said point bears North 690 55' 16" West; thence along said reverse curve thru a central angle of 200 07' 44" an arc distance • of 122.12 feet; thence North 00 O1' 00" West 117.99 feet to a curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 11° 15' 27" an arc distance of 58.94 feet to the centerline of Bridgeport Drive; thence along the centerline of Bridgeport Drive North 770 06' 40" East 78.65 feet to a cruve concave northwesterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 140 24' 35" an arc distance of 50.30 feet; thence continuing along the centerline. of. Bridgeport North 620 42' 05" East 159.21 feet to a curve concave southerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve 75± feet to the intersection with the centerline. of 20 foot wide alley as shown on said map of Tract 3908; thence North 00 O1' 20" West 1081: feet to the south line of lot No. 65 of said Tract 3908; thence along said south line South 89° 56' 40" West 68.00 feet to the westerly line of said lot No. 65; thence along said west line North 310 42' 29" East 170.30 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 140.00 feet; thence along said.curve thru a central angle • of 600 44' 31" an arc distance of 148.42 feet; thence North 00 O1' 20" West 139.59 feet to the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said point being distant 202.01 feet along the centerline of 'Garfield Avenue from the centerline of Newland Street; thence along the centerline of Garfield Avenue South 890 40' 15" West 270.02 feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the centerline of Crimson Circle as shown on a map of Tract No. 8961 recorded in Book 388 Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along centerline of Crimson Circle North 00 50' 14" West 384.62 feet to .a curve, concave westerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 23' 26" an arc distance of 57.90 feet to .a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 55.00 feet; thence northerly and northeasterly along said reverse curve thru 'a • central angle of 900 17' 22" an arc distance of 86.67 feet to a second consecutive reverse curve, concave northwesterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 49' 1911, an arc distance of 58.72 feet to a third consecutive reverse curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence easterly along said curve thru a central angle of 320 55' 2311, an arc distance of 114.92 feet; thence North 890 09' 46" East 107.32 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Flagstaff Lane, said point being on a curve concave westerly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of .330 53' 39" an arc distance of 118.31 feet to a reverse curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 160 47' 49", an arc distance of 58.63 feet; thence North 320 24' 34" West 586.05 feet to a curve concave easterly having a radius of 113.72 feet; thence northerly along said curve thru a central angle of 320 03' 09" an arc distance of 63.62 feet; thence North 00 21' 25" West 53.00 feet • to the intersection with the centerline of Modale Drive as shown on a map of Tract No. 8332 recorded in Book 367 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along the centerline of Modale Drive South 890 38' 35" West 130.23 feet to the easterly boundary of Tract No. 7628 as shown on a map recorded in Book 352 Page 38 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said east boundary North 00 51' 25" West 660.72 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract No. 7628, said point also being on the southerly boundary of Tract No. 8687 as shown on a map recorded in Book 361 Page 21 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of.said County; thence along said south boundary North 890 36' 44" East 64.66 feet to the southeast corner of said Tract No. 8687; thence along the east boundary of Tract No. 8687 North 00 50' 15" West 660.78 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Ellis Avenue, said point also being the intersection with the • southerly prolongation of the west boundary line of Tract No. 7771 as shown on a map recorded in Book 352 Page 38 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder . of said County; thence along said west boundary North 00 39' 11" West 743.33 feet; thence North 890 20' 49" East 125 feet; thence South 00 39' 11 East 84.13 feet; thence North 890 44' 17" East 243.15 feet; thence North 380 14' 20" East 41.00 feet; thence North 160 18' 24" East 44.16 feet; thence North 580 50' 00" East 55.50 feet; thence North 310 00, 00" East 45.00 feet; thence North 320 35' 24" East 72.06 feet; North 290 14' 15" East 65.00 feet; thence North 00 39' 48" West 56.00 feet; thence North 890 20' 12" East 110.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Newland Street; thence along the centerline of Newland Street South 0° 39' 48"-East 2640.43 feet to the centerline intersection with Ellis Avenue said intersection also being the center of section 36 Township 5 South, Range 11 West; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 51'25" East 2643.74 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Garfield Avenue, said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 36; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 37' 20" East 2640.38 feet to the intersection with • the centerline of Yorktown Avenue, said intersection also being the center of section 1 as shown on a map of Tract No. 7991 recorded in Book 315 Page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 00 36' 38" East 2640.46 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Adams Avenue said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 1 as shown on said Map of Tract No. 7991; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street, South 00 39' 05" East .2642.56 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis Avenue, said intersection also being the center of section 12, Township 6 South, Range 11 West as shown on a map for Tract No. 7341 recorded in Book 301 Page 22 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Newland Street South 0° 39' 19" East 2651.08 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Atlanta Avenue, said intersection also being the south one-quarter corner of said section 12 as shown on said map of Tract No. 7341; thence along the • centerline of Atlanta Avenue North 890 38' 45" East 2640.83 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Magnolia Street as shown on said map of Tract No. 7341; thence along the centerline of Magnolia Street, North 00 35' 45" West 2640.60 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Indianapolis as shown on a map for Tract No. 6309 recorded in Book 233 Page 49 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street North 00 39' 05" West 2642.56 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Adams Avenue as shown on a map for Tract No. 7692 recorded in Book 329 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street North 00 37' 20". West 2641.13 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Yorktown Avenue as shown on a map for Tract No. 7991 recorded in Book 315 Page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence continuing along the centerline of Magnolia Street • North 00 37' 15" West 2640.29 feet to the Point of Beginning; Excepting therefrom that portion described as follows: Beginning at the east one-quarter corner of section 13, said corner being the centerline intersection of Magnolia Street and Hamilton Avenue; thence along the centerline of Magnolia Street South 00 38' 30" East 2120± feet to a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1000.00 feet; thence along said curve thru a central angle of 430 42' 09".an arc distance of 762.75 feet; thence South 430 03' 39" West 80.64 feet to a point on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Orange County Flood Control District's Talbert Channel, said point also being on a curve concave northerly having a radius of 4717.50 feet; thence westerly along said curve 150± feet to the end of said curve; thence North 450 08' 03" West 247.19 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2317.50 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 440 • 30' 59" an arc distance of 1800.60 feet to a reverse curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 457.69 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve thru a central angle of 300+ an arc distance of 6021 feet to the southerly prolongation of the easterly boundary of Tract No. 9843 as shown on a map recorded in Book 477 Page 44; thence along said prolongation and east boundary North 00 40' 42" West 800± feet to the centerline of Hamilton Avenue; thence along the centerline of Hamilton Avenue North 890 35' 00" East 1320.45 feet to the Point of Beginning. • i • EXHIBIT C • LIST OF PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS i (0132D) NOTE: Refer to Exhibit D • for map showing locations of improvements. EXHIBIT C PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS Storm Drains Installation of additional storm drains to correct deficiencies and increase capactiy at the following locations: 1. At the Adams pump station, a 60-inch storm drain to parallel the.existing pipe from the pump station to Bushard Street in Adams Avenue (Drainage District 7B). .2. At the Banning pump station, a 54-inch storm drain in Banning Avenue and a 42 inch storm drain in Cape May Lane to parallel the existing pipes (Drainage District 7C). 3._ In the vicinity of the Atlanta pump station, a network of drains including a 30-inch storm drain on Beach Boulevard 1,600 feet south from Atlanta Avenue, 30-inch and 24-inch storm drains in the Geneva/Delaware and Elmira/Delaware area, and a connection from Frankfort Avenue to Beach Boulevard (Drainage District 8B). 4. At the Indianapolis pump station, a 54-inch storm drain to parallel the existing storm drain from the pump station to Bushard Street (Drainage District 7F). 5. In the vicinity of the Fountain Valley Channel and Southern California Edison right-of-way, a network of drains including an 84-inch storm drain from the Channel to Brookhurst Streeet where it reduces to 42-inch and extends east 2,000 feet then branches north and south with 24-inch storm drains (Drainage Districts 6B, 6A & 7D). Pump Stations Correction of deficiencies in the following City-owned pump stations: 6 Flounder pump station, 9731 _Flounder Lane - major modification to pump station and incoming line. 7. Indianapolis pump station, 9221 Indianapolis Avenue - replacement of two small engines and pumps with larger units. 8. Newland pump station, 8612 Hamilton Avenue - construct additional building with two pumps. 9. Adams pump station, 19961 Chesapeake Lane - replace two engines. • 10. Yorktown pump station, 9211 Yorktown Avenue - replace one pump and engine. 11. Atlanta pump station, 8151 Atlanta Avenue - add sump pump. (0132D) Drainage Channels Correction of deficiencies in the system of county-owned drainage channels (DO1, DO2 & DO5) • through widening, deepening and concrete lining and including construction of one or more water retarding basins, depending upon alignment selected. 12. DO Channel 13. DO2 Channel 14. DO Channel 15. Bartlett Park (Possible retarding basin site) 16.. Edison right-of-way (Possible retarding basin site) • (0132D) • EXHIBIT D MAP OF PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS (0132D) ••• • • Q Q' 14 5 j �' 1w11'�= p•1�•p1llltlylpl.S : v 1 6 Me .. .-.. R C! 1 p WLr I • :•�lirj\wwiw•• r•M�••-yy�� IYinlwelp� _141�1�•1�1•Ip •••.••<tlll•IA IH 11pMAd iya ys4 �O n11M j.._yl1�dI11lA`U G^. 15 1��1��r:wpplpllllupp��gpp1p1l��p1x��n��l��ww Milli •�gtlpllllllpU "__� •l1��1�1itll ptlgY - /R�/- r-- 1i.� p1�11 ,y`�pltll � I 1 s.�;�•SCi i•=y�illN1/�•iwH1�W4 IY NO al €=r=_� __nwmg�m�1wll��•�n f .tll w ,,m NONE � KM'�n�s��`a_=nwvi�ly� ',}'.�ltlA1N�••WII� �I� .�I �g� � ■�,�'1� � " 11111 �? �1�l-� �umpl�-iu1? • i -lower�wlr i .�-II �`= .,..� I �< '�II'Igp'i' C ~ 1 • �:lam.- �(�1 _p. .� I/ 1A -1.♦ Q Ilp L P � ice'- 1 _rj ♦j�+.� �— li�111111111� 12 , r�.pp�iL •f � �;�s ` e is �`�� it l • ®�♦� �1I��.I�1111111�11..1111� �amu���Ip q�.i,_ • � •�u�.p.pw.�i. pa� ? ,�...y � Y _ '� ♦♦`�, 1'�i�l III PIG um + • • !�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦i��I, III a 11 I�.�I��� � � ���, ,. _ }_�._ ��`T� p111191 ���I♦`'�® ��Ili��I®1 it 1� .. . - — ♦. '' I 'I� '1 Q IWtlA `������.�` �♦� �/am•e:l _ ^_ _� ` '�®`'Ii1iIi"-ii�� .h j e w��e EM ,,� a snaip` 1= i -�'*�t�or.�.1�� a 1r F. I : �pp/`lnp1�� '��i'I ..•ir .►.ingl wlwl �.y4 I - I •-... _.� F�4 1 !'IjG�CCCCCii=7=3=811 Is law ll �bisl• '�i� � � \ ♦ ipuR % �,.l�jp11 wpun •JJ l�•��� Rigel"•{j!-.,-.,Y ♦ 1 V S r • EXHIBIT E MAP OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USES • (0132D) W • IIIIIIII . - - - iprpn• � , - - • ►p 0 a r • • r®Ir ■$ Illpl; I "Slnunmunnu t '1t •.BYgll■Iq pl.lpl$ .:':':':•:•:':':'.��f ,.y„ �,,,r 11111 ►_ r ., � � _..��_a�CiQN L =IpY� ti WRE, I�'°'"1111111�11:1111 '"Ir'=�"""r-.: 'f 1� ; ,` p �111111 tr ' i�1� r' oi..y9j, �• .�Iy�� i '.���`I■(p" � --iii C ZI�1 Ig111111 �: knowg �1 �®fin •���,���' ��• '0�`� err' • EXHIBIT F DISTRIBUTION OE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE TYPES (0132D) PERCENTAGE Of LAND USE TYPE ++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++.++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++ . +++++++++++++++++++++++++.. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++. +++++++++++.++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++RESIDENTIAL-++++++++++ +++++++++++ -+++++++++++.. +++++++++++ 87% . -++++++++++++ ++++++++++-++ttttttt-r-r++++++++++++. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ COMMERICAL +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ......................... ... " ++++++++++++++-1-+++++-+- ' 4% ++++++++++++++++++ . +++++++++++++++++++ INDUSTRIAL ++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1% ++++++++++++++++++++++ ....................... ........................ i +++++++++++++++++++++++++•. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++, PUBLIC +++++++++.+++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++., 8% ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++, ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++� . ++++++++++++++++++++++++� +++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++ mum HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN BREAKDOWN OUR PLANNING DIVISION AV pop EXHIBIT F � ` i Huntingt»o Reach Redevelopment Agency � Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project ` TAX INCREMENT Px0JOCrl0w ASSUMPTIONS \]984 V5 Renl and Od`rr pmp�r/y yalu�. por�unnL �n our valuation -- - . � yo] l from the tax r^]l microfiche; other property a^en not include Soc value, which would no, impact the projection; 1984-05 value is also the base year value. -- Nev revelopment; The following assumptions were used in the pro- jection - \ / ONE PACIFIC PLAZA: Under� construction is a 6-story oEyice ' i building of 98,000 square feet (construction dates 2/84-1/85) / � under construction in a 4-story medical office building of / / 55,000 square feet (construction dates 2184-1/85) / parking � | structure of 6 levels and 750 spaces (construction dates 7/84- \ ]/85) i ) Planned construction: lZ-otocy office building of 197,600 square reeq (construction dates 10/86-12/8 / ) / a -two-story | ) office building of 10,080 square feet (construction dates . l0/84-]/85) / a 774 room "Holiday Inn Quality" hotel (conhcor- � Liou rn,nx 2/09-6/06) / expansion of the 6-Jev,| parking gar- age by 0n0-spaces. HUmT]nOToN CENTER: \ short Bange; Development - � Dept . Store� 80`080 square feet (construction dates 10/86-11/87) Hall Shops - 16,000 square feet (construction dates / ' \ ]0/86-11/87) Food Court - 8,000 nqonro {eeL (construction dates 10/86-11/87 ) | / Theater complex - 20,000 square feet (construction dates \ ! 10/86-11/87) ' � � Construction nchrdulp based on our assumptions (we were unable ( to obtain this date from the owner/developer ) | � -- Tax Rates: ]�84-O5 r^ir, r,'Ncn� by ]O� o� 8`o nv'rride co�e [o� ' . ! each year thereafter. � i |} . . � � | | � \ | � / � / V | / c_mLn ;;t .EL ENT rvE';'uY rcocr, ^' STiS5TvN '-t'ITtP CCitrEn:InL DI3T":ICT SEDEVELOP!ENT PROJECT J- :C :: LE ^F NEW DEYELO T 100934 i000's o»tt?=_d1 E VA rLC.'"ENi SCOPE S PER TOT_" UE !984-85 1?85-r� i96b-87 19E1-oa i989-8? - ------------ --------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 98,800 sq. it: 59 5,76: 5,;52 y1cc t��.j. JJ,0 00 sq. 'f. -ir.,_ 197,61) :•7. it. rfI[e Su.11d,trg 10,000 sa. ft. 58 SOV 5!0 170 Parking 5truc',ur_ phase ; 75i! sp. 5,500 4,125 3 )i+ 825 pease II t'OO sp. 5,50p 4.400 1,540 2,ho e fit_ Store 8 ,0ii0 sq. ft, 50 4.000 i3O!l0 31000 0;a =hca5 16.000 sq. ft. 45 720 18+) 540 Foaa Court 8,000 sq. ft. 65 520 130 391? Theiter Coa¢ie.; 20,000 sq. it. 58 1,160 290 870 TOinL 12,"1 14,351 18,961 4,263 --------- --------- --------- --------- 4,5 75 � nJ _ ::.'ATE _, T_ar 531 Tote! -a! =r T t a I Le== daze iear 1'C' 2f!id! :!''', 1♦OUSI0 2f ax rIC^i:e.".i FrGr=rtv Fr r7CJc_} V3IU2 Ot 62,5 % Tyr adl2 Tax r?°Vtit1E: Set F51d2 lfCf iFi[ ---------- ---------- --------- ------------- ---------- -------- -------------- -------------- --------- ------------ ----------- --------- S2 S37, 77;a5_ 14,351 92,525 112, 04 ._ 113,326 50,.SA? 1,121527 563 114 455 M3-33 112,c74 1 i 5,")6!i 4 '6 119,32' S22 119,345 57,211,3 1,104166 612 126 505 i?=7-i0 1C9,_2; i i,7 21,7 9 522 122,231 54,594 1.0h305 648 130 513 li;i,-?1 l2!,7i9 124,i4; 0 124,:=.3 `� _' 1214,665 62;023 1.069444 6C7 I3;. 531 i 6,�25 127,148 64,°!1 I.:'-5'_O" 619 lib 543 12?,1SY t' l29,'°- �:_ 12?,6a1 67,044 i•014'2_ 6?4 139 555 tS4; 12?,1`9 131,742 0 13!,74� 52 132,264 69,627 1.017;S1 708 142 567 1??;-'S i i,i42, 13',;77 ) i37 134 899 72,262 1.000U00 723 145 J76 i 102484 KatzHollis MmJNMC1 PARTS II AND III of the REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL on the PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for the HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared by KATZ, HOLLIS, COREN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for the HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY October, 1984 Katz Hol 1 is TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PART II.. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA. . . . . . . . II-1 A. Existing Physical Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 1. Project Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 2. Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 a. Existing Land Uses . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 b. Adjacent Land Uses . . . . . . . II-2 C. Predominantly Urbanized Area . . . II-3 3. Buildings and Structures. . . . . . . . . . II-3 a. Description of the Project Area by Sub-Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-3 (1) Sub-Area A. . . . . . . . . . . . . II-3 (2) Sub-Area B. II-3 (3) Sub-Area C. II-4. (4) Sub-Area D. . . . . . . . . . . . . II-5 (5) Sub-Area E. . . . . . . . . . . . . II-5 (6) Sub-Area F. . . . . . . . . . . . . I I-5 (7) Sub-Area G. . . . . . . . . . . II-6 b. Obsolescent Design and Lack of Physical Integration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-6 C. Inadequate -Public Improvements and Proj- ect Area Traffic Conditions. . . . . II-7 (1) Circulation System. . . . . . . . . II-7 (2) Street Capacity and Levels of Ser- vice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I-10 (3) Circulation Deficiencies on Edinger Avenue and Center Drive . . . . . . II-11 (4) Other Circulation-Deficiencies. . . II-12 (5) Summary of Inadequate Public Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . II-12 B. Existing Social Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . II-14 C. Existing Economic Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . II-14 1. Economic Disuse Resulting from Faulty Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I-14 2. Existence of Inadequate Public Improvements II-15 Katz Hol l is i Page 2 of TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3. Economic Maladjustment and Impaired Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-15 PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 A. General Financing Methods Available to Agency. . . III-1 B. . Tax Increment Financing Method . . . . . . . . . . III-1 C. Estimated Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 D. Proposed Financing Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . III-4 E. Tax Increment Limitations and Requirements . . . . III-5 TABLE OF MAPS Following Page MAP. 1 Project Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 MAP 2 General Plan Land Uses .of Project Area . . . . . . II-2 MAP 3 Adjacent Land .Uses .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-2 MAP 4 Project Area Sub-Areas and Businesses. . . . . . . II-3 MAP 5 Huntington Center. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . II-5 MAP 6 I-405 Access to Project Area . . . . . . . II-8 MAP 7 Edinger Avenue: Curb Cuts and left Turn Lanes II-8 MAP 8 Existing Traffic Volumes (P.M. Peak Hour) . . . . II-9 MAP 9 Existing Shopping Center Volumes (P.M. Peak Hour) . II-9 MAP 10 Orange County Regional Shopping Centers. . . . . . II-16 Katz Hollis i Page 3 of TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES Following Page TABLE II-1 Businesses in Project Area . . . . . . . . . . . II-3 TABLE II-2 Existing and Future Intersection Levels of Service II-10 TABLE II-3 Annual Retail Sales and Ranking of Huntington Center with Other Regional Shopping Centers in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. . . . . . . . . . II-15 TABLE II-4 Regional Shopping Centers in Orange County II=16 TABLE II-5 Comparative 1982 Sales Performance of Huntington Center with Other Selected Super-Regional Shopping Centers* in Los Angeles and Orange Counties (*Centers of Similar Size) . . . . . . . . . . . . II-16 . TABLE II-6 Comparative 1982 Sales Performance of Competitive Super-Regional Shopping Centers with Huntington Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-16 TABLE II-7 Retail Sales Per Capita, Orange County Cities, 1981 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-16 TABLE II-8 Effective Buying Income, 1983, II-16 TABLE II-9 Retail Sales Analysis, 1983 (Department Store- Type Merchandise) , Huntington Beach Market Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-16 TABLE II-10 DSTM Sales Experience Rates, 1979-1983 . . . . . . II-16 TABLE II-11 Taxable Sales Generated by Huntington Center Com- pared to Total Taxable Sales in City of Huntington Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I-17 TABLE III-1 Estimated Public Improvements and Facilities Project Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-3 TABLE III-2 Estimated Project Costs, .. . . . . . . . . . . III-4 PHOTOGRAPHS Plates 1 through 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-17 Katz Hollis PARTS II AND III OF THE REPORT TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE HUNTINGTO.N. CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INTRODUCTION The following two sections of the Report to the City Council ('City Council`) of the City of Huntington Beach on the proposed Rede- velopment Plan ("Redevelopment Plan' ) for the Huntington Center Commer- cial District Redevelopment Project ('Project_ '.), have been prepared by Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. (Katz Hollis). for the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency ("Agency') pursuant to Sections 33352(bj and (c) of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq. ) ; Description of Physical, Social and Eco- nomic Conditions Existing 'in Project Area, and Proposed Method of Fi- nancing Redevelopment of Project Area. Two additional sections of the .Report to City Council will be, prepared by Katz Hollis and submitted subsequent to receipt of required • documents, or completion of the activities of the authorities involved: Summary of Consultations with Affected Taxing Agencies, and Analysis of Report of the County Fiscal Officer (CRL Section 33352[m] ) . Agency staff are preparing all remaining sections of the Report to City Council on the proposed Project Redevelopment Plan. . The sec- tions contained herein and those to be prepared by Katz Hollis at a later date, together with the sections prepared by Agency staff, consti- tute the full Report to City Council. (1) Katz Hol l is i PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA Information presented in this Part II of the Huntington Beach Re- development Agency's Report to City Council on the Proposed Redevelop- ment Plan for the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project was compiled from various sources, including: -- Interviews with staff of the Agency, City and management of the Huntington Center; -- A review and analysis of various reports, documents, photo- graphs, plans (including the General Plan and North Hun- tington Center Specific Plan) and other background data; -- Taxable Retail Sales information for the Project Area com- piled by Katz Hollis from a variety of sources including the Los Angeles Times Marketing Research Department, Wo- men's Wear Daily .(a trade publication), and interviews with Huntington Center Management; -- Traffic studies prepared by Donald Frischer and Associates for One Pacific Plaza and Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and • Douglas, Inc. as part of the Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and -- A field survey of the Project Area conducted by Katz Hollis in September, 1984. In general, all sources of data are cited throughout this Part II of the Report to City Council. A. Existing Physical Conditions 1. Project Location The geographical area encompassed by the Huntington Center Com- mercial District Redevelopment Project (the "Project Area") totals ap- proximately 160 acres marked with an irregular boundary, and includes the existing _Huntington Center shopping center and adjacent commercial use on the south side of Edinger Avenue and north of Center Drive. The Project Area is generally bounded by the San Diego. Freeway and McFadden Avenue to the north; Beach Boulevard to the east; Gothard Street, the Southern California Edison Co. right-of-way and Southern Pacific Rail- road (SPRR) right-of-way to the west; and Aldrich Avenue and a line ex- tending east/west approximately 660 feet south of Edinger Avenue to the south. The Old World Village shopping center and Seawind Apartments that lie north of Center Drive and. south of McFadden Avenue between Hun- (II-1) Katz-Hollis tington Village Way to the east and the Southern Pacific Railroad. right- of-way to the west, are excluded from the Project area. The Project Area's boundaries are depicted in Map 1. Nearly all of the Project Area can be seen in the aerial photo- graph in Plate 1. 2. Land Uses a. Existing Land Uses There are three land uses within the Project Area: general com- mercial, mixed development, and public/quasi--public/institutional. The locations of these uses are exhibited in Map 2. The public/quasi pub- lic/institutional uses, comprised of the rights-of-way for. the Southern Pacific Railroad and Southern -California Edison Company, together with a large vacant parcel owned by the Orange County Transit District, lie to the east of Gothard Street and to the west of the western boundary. of Old World Village and the Seawind apartments formed by the railroad. Mixed use development (office and commercial) in the Project Area lies north of Center Drive and south of the San Diego Freeway, controlled by the North Huntington Center Specific Plan. A phased development, which will be described in subsequent sections, known as One Pacific Plaza, is under way in this area. The remainder of the Project Area is general commercial. The land use designations within the Huntington Beach Gen- eral Plan parallel the existing uses. b. Adjacent Land Uses Land uses adjacent to the Project Area are depicted in Map 3. To the north and east, the San Diego .Freeway (I-405) and its Beach Boule- vard interchange is a significant barrier that separates the Project Area from adjoining land uses. To the south of the Project Area, indus- trial uses lie along the railroad tracks and commercial uses lie to the east of Beach Boulevard. The remaining area is residential, 9enerally medium to high density. Two blocks of commercial development on Edinger Avenue to the west include a large furniture chain store. A neighbor- hood scale retail center and small office building to the south of Cen- ter Drive and east of Gothard Street contain many service-oriented busi- nesses, some related to the Golden West Community College campus just to the west of Gothard Street. The Project Area surrounds a mixed use development to the north of Center Drive, east of the Southern Pacific Railroad right.-of.-way, west of Huntington Village Way, and south of McFadden Avenue. The Sea Wind Apartments is a 277 unit rental housing complex, and the Old World Village shopping center contains 38,000 square feet of specialty commer- cial space and 45 residential condominium units. (II-2) • McFADDEN ■ I 1 lotO ... ■ O e : I AFF I • I I NL1'P.fAft;' � •#0,: , I I i I CENTER DRIVE ■.../.. �..■.■■■■■.11 - I I ED15CN mtmENj i I V I I � I V I HUNTINGTON CENTER s � � J� EDINGER AVE. Ed _ f1 n r-- --1 r1 r1(l n r� rip - : .........T /.....././...N.. ............................ PROJECT BOUNDARIES . m SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEP'T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES KatzHollis HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAP 1 MSrADDEN ED - � ifZ.T.■7iir� s� - ■ • • LL QUA� UBUC� •':i. •' STITUilO AL • fit'' f' �•• .�•� . MIXED USFS (..__—__ �` CENTER DRIVE � ��.�.��• L .• . { v Y . I HIMTINGTON CENTER ] JC 0 on ! GENERAL COMMERCIAL . EDNGER AVE. r ! f- --- ■ �� 1r-1rr -1r 1r -1!-lri-*, it ■ ■ • •o.......■.� ■ ■ . ■ Scale 1' - ?p0' : : ::........... :I ■■..■..�■.................N� GENERAL PLAN LAND USES OF PROJECT AREA m SOURCE:HUNTINGTON BEACH DEP'T OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Katz Hol I is HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAP 2 F = III�Ii111 � If *:� 111111111 I II DID no , Illlllllil��,I, 'INDUSMIMM ia• ►a .a crr � � CF-C no �► I � . .. lul11 p Allllll4 /11 ruur�all INIIIIIIII��11�1l9 �— -- L G1 HUNTINGTON CENTERCOMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENTKatzHollis DISTRICT PROJECT Katz Hol l is C. Predominantly Urbanized Area The Project Area is an area of the community which is a predomi- nantly urbanized area in that not less than 80 percent of the privately owned property in the Project Area has been .or is developed for urban uses. In addition, the Project Area, as described in this Part II of the Report to City Council, is characterized by an economic dislocation- resulting from faulty planning. 3. Buildings and Structures In August and September, 1984, a field survey of the Project Area was conducted to identify land uses and physical development., and to evaluate Project Area conditions. The results of the survey are pre- sented below and illustrated in Plates 1 through 14. a.' Description of the Project Area by Sub-Area To simplify presentation of a description of the Project Area, portions of the Project Area have been labelled Sub-Areas A through G, as illustrated on Map 4. A list of businesses in the Project Area, .with addresses, and a sub-area location number-keyed to Map 4 is provided in Table II-1. (1) Sub-Area A This small area adjacent to the San Diego Freeway has an. .M-1 (Manufacturing) zoning classification, and contains a trucking rental/ storage business with two buildings and a two story office building. These structures, shown in Plate 3, are in fair condition and were pro- bably built fifteen to twenty years ago. (2) Sub-Area B Under the high voltage transmission lines of the Southern Cali- fornia Edison Company, and within their right-of-way, is a Christmas tree farm with a small trailer serving as an office. The remainder is vacant, as can be seen in .Plates 1 and 13. Property to the west of .the lines at the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Center Drive has been used for temporary parking by Golden West College. The College re- cently sold the property to the Orange County Transit District, who is proposing the development of a 'Transportation Center' to consist of .a transfer point for twelve bus lines, a 'park and ride' facility and pos- sibly an interstate service line. (II-3) ■�i i 12-,7 l. McFADDEN ■ i I �14, i I Q% ■ R I c°F� i �+ I ■ '' q y i 1 ■ �, ED ' ■ a-mmomm I ■ � - : PROP � ■■ ■■■■■■ a/- CENTER DRIVE ■■■■■■■*, I I EDI5CN EA5EMEN)- L———— -- --- - - ------- - • I 3 I o ■ HUNTINGTON CENTERDL ■ I 1 � n � 2 D of ' ai = of 3 EDINGER ■� . Q F , 3l, �1 2 ' 13 16 7 i 2-7-� 8-1, 12 E 8 G 15-20 22--2 "" 14 now i ■ ■■■■■■■■■. 15ILI i ■ in, PROJECT AREA SUB-AREAS AND BUSINESSES SOURCE:KATZ HOLLIS SURVEY AND MACDONALD.GROUP LTD. HUNTINGTON KatzHolliS D STRICT RED REDEVELOPMENT MENTER TA PROJECTAL MAP 4 CT Katz Hal 1 iS 092484 mNPII+ICl Table II--1 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project BUSINESSES IN PRWEC'T AREA Map.Key Sub- Bus. Area No. Street Address Name of Business A 1 7501 McFadden Avenue Hoffman Enterprises 2 7531 McFadden Avenue Huntington College of Dental Technology 3 7531 McFadden Avenue J. Holder Co. 4 7531 McFadden Avenue Michael Petersen 5 7531 McFadden Avenue PHP Development Co. 6 . 7531 McFadden Avenue C. D. Roofing Co. 7 . 7531 McFadden Avenue Duration Inc. B 1 7462 McFadden Avenue Tretyme C 1 7777 Center Drive, Suite 100 Liberty National Bank 7777 Center Drive, Suite 100 Security Mortgage Service - Corporate Office 7777 Center Drive, Suite 101 Coffee Plus 7777 Center Drive, Suite 202 Fran Fagen and Christine Young, Attorneys 7777 Center Drive, Suite 203 Nancy Pollard, John Rapillo, Paul Reilly, Attorneys 7777 Center-Drive, Suite 204 Pension Engineers, Inc., Ponch Co. Investment Brokers, George Tays, Action Resumes, Joyce Annenberg, Castle Real Estate, Hicor Corp. 7777 Center Drive, Suite 205 Liberty National Bank - Cashiers Department 7777 Center Drive, Suite 207 Cully and Ryan, Attorneys 7777 Center Drive, Suite 222 Pignone, Inc. 7777 Center Drive, Suite 300 Dodson and Miller Accountancy Corp. 7777 Center Drive, Suite 301 Kcppes Weisman Woollsey Advertising Agency 7777 Center Drive, Suite 302 Union Mutual 7777 Center Drive, Suite 303. BEN Coam mications Corp. 7777 Center Drive, Suite 304 SALESwordd 7777 Center Drive, Suite 305 Caarpetitive Edge Advertising 7777 Center Drive, •Suite 306 DSI Enterprises, Inc., Liberty Tax Service, Lord & Sax Financial Services 777.7 Center Drive, Suite 308 Huntington Management and Leasing 7777 Center Drive, Suite 333 American Youth Sports Foundation; Smith Financial 7777 Center Drive, Suite 402 Gruber and Gruber Accountancy Corp. 7777Center Drive, Suite 404 Inte Can Inc. 7777 Center Drive, Suite 405 Manpower 7777 Center Drive, Suite 406 Western underwriters-Insurance CcgDany 7777 Center Drive, Suite 505 Liberty National Bank Loan Production Department 7777 Center Drive,. Suite 505 Security Mortgage Service - Loan Production Dept. 7777 Center Drive,: Suite 530 Sonama International Katz Hollis Table II-1 - Page 2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center CcRmercial District Redevelopment Project BUSINESSES IN PRQhXT AREA Map Key Sub- Bus. Area No. Street Address Name of Business C 1 7777 Center Drive, Suite 555 Occidental Chemical Corp., Hooker Industrial and Specialty Chemicals 7777 Center Drive, Suite 600 Memorial Health Srvc., Men. Health Technologies, Partners in Care 2 7887 Center Drive Rusty Scupper 3 7979 Center Drive Rascal's D 1 7777 Edinger Avenue Something Special in Jewelry 7777 Edinger Avenue Digital Shoppe 7777 Edinger Avenue Royal 14K Gold 7777 Edinger Avenue I Natural Cosmetics 7777 Edinger Avenue T Shirts Plus 7777 Edinger Avenue L.J. Hausner Construction Co. 7777 Edinger Avenue Montganery Ward 7777 Edinger Avenue Thom McAn Shoes 7777 Edinger Avenue House of Millers 7777.Edinger Avenue children's Fair 7777 Edinger Avenue Flytrap 7777 Edinger Avenue Zales 7777 Edinger Avenue Swiss Colony. 7777 Edinger Avenue Lin's Hallmark 7777 Edinger Avenue Bob's Old Fashion Ice Cream 7777 Edinger Avenue Musicland 7777 Edinger Avenue Lerner Shops 7777 Edinger Avenue Bob's Big Boy, Jr. 7777 Edinger Avenue Mall Office 7777 Edinger Avenue Great Earth 7777 Edinger Avenue House of Fabrics 7777 Edinger Avenue Fashion Conspiracy 7777 Edinger Avenue Radio Shack 7777 Edinger Avenue The Limited, Inc. 7777 Edinger Avenue Waldenbooks 7777 Edinger Avenue Kay-Bee Toys 7777 Edinger Avenue Kinney Shoes 7777 Edinger Avenue Jules 7777 Edinger Avenue Fanfare . 7777 Edinger Avenue Parklane Hosiery 7777 Edinger Avenue Frcmex Photo 7777 Edinger Avenue Grandma's. Buffalo Chip Cookies K1tz Holl i:s i Table II-1 - Page 3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopnent Project BUSINESSES IN PRLIJECT AREA Map Key Sub- Bus. Area No. Street Address Name of Business D 1 7777 Edinger Avenue Dr. Stein, Optanetrist 7777 Edinger- Avenue General Nutrition Center 7777 Edinger Avenue Orange Julius 7777 Edinger Avenue Mothercare 7777 Edinger Avenue See's Candies 7777 Edinger Avenue Regal Shoes 7777 Edinger Avenue Stride Rite 7777 Edinger Avenue J.C. Penney 7777 Edinger Avenue Lawson's Jewelers 7777 Edinger Avenue Hatch Cards 7777 Edinger Avenue Chic Accessories 7777 Edinger Avenue Leed's Shoe Store 7777 Edinger- Avenue Jackie's Fashion 7777 Edinger Avenue Wet Seal 7777 Edinger Avenue GTE Phone Mart 7777 Edinger Avenue Foot Locker 7777 Edinger Avenue Jay Jacobs 7777 Edinger Avenue Miller's Outpost 7777 Edinger Avenue Ella Nor's 7777 Edinger Avenue Show Off 7777 Edinger Avenue Harris and Frank 7777.Edinger Avenue The Broadway D 2 7777 Edinger Avenue Barker Brothers 7777 Edinger Avenue North American Savings and Loan 7777 Edinger Avenue D & R Shoe Repair 7777 Edinger Avenue Huntington Center Cleaners 7777 Edinger Avenue Magic Camb 7777 Edinger Avenue Hair Productions Unlimited 7777 Edinger Avenue Stanley Anzis, DDS 7777 Edinger Avenue Gibraltar Savings and Loan Assn. 7777 Edinger Avenue Time Square Delicatessen 7777 Edinger Avenue Lee Ward's 7777 Edinger Avenue The Akron 7777 Edinger Avenue Crocker Bank 3 7777 Edinger Avenue Montgou ery Ward Tires - Batteries - Accessories 4 7777 Edinger Avenue Firestone 5 7777 Edinger Avenue Security Pacific National Bank 6 7777 Edinger Avenue Broadway Tires - Batteries - Accessories 7 7777 Edinger Avenue Standard Oil Co. Katz Hol 1 is Table II-1 - Page 4 Huntington Beach Redevelopnent Agency Huntington Center Ccunercial District Redevelopnent Project BUSINESSES IN PROJECT AREA Map Key Sub- Bus. Area No. Street Address Name of Business E 1 7490 Edinger Avenue Denny's Restaurant #1103 2 7552 Edinger Avenue Sears Savings Bank 3 7590 Edinger Avenue Finance American Thrift Coupany 4 7594 Edinger Avenue Nosh's Seafood Bar/Grill 5 7596 Edinger Avenue Davonne's Florist 6 7598 Edinger Avenue Winchell's Donut #436 7 7622 Edinger Avenue Wienerschnitzel #318 8 7660 Edinger Avenue One Hour Photo 9 7504 Edinger Avenue P.O.E.T.S 10 7508 Edinger Avenue Nail Curist 7508 Edinger Avenue Debra venti 7508 Edinger Avenue Linda Pinch 7508 Edinger Avenue Tahirih Walls 11 7510 Edinger Avenue Alvera's Bridal Shop 12 7516 Edinger Avenue Huntington Beach Formal Ware 13 7532 Edinger Avenue Phil & Jim's TV/Appliances 14 7542 Edinger Avenue Skagg's Drug Store 15 7562 Edinger Avenue Fashion Gal 16 7568 Edinger Avenue Barro's Pizza 17 7570 Edinger Avenue Patrini's Shoes 18 7572 Edinger Avenue Peking & Szechwan Restaurant 19 7586 Edinger Avenue Barbara's Hallmark Shop 20 7583 Edinger Avenue Collar and Leash Pet Shop 21 7600 Edinger Avenue Safeway Store #468 22 7632 Edinger Avenue Unicorn Sports Center 23 7636 Edinger Avenue Artistic Beauty Supply 24 7640 Edinger Avenue 9)Wrpoo Roan 7640 Edinger Avenue Jackie Aldstadt 7640 Edinger Avenue Diana L. Daniels 7640 Edinger Avenue Laura Dickey 7640 Edinger Avenue Diane Beach 25 7644 Edinger Avenue Toni's C&D Auto Supply 26 7648 Edinger Avenue Yull, DDS 27 7656 Edinger Avenue Launderland 28 7664 Edinger Avenue The Cleaning Factory F 1 7672 Edinger Avenue Leo's Stereo 2 7682 Edinger Avenue Paolo's Pizza 3 7700 Edinger Avenue C & M Cleaners Katz Hol l i s Table II-1 - Page 5 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project BUSINESSES IN PFDJECP AREA Map Key Sub- Bus. Area No. Street Address Name of Business F 4 7702 Edinger Avenue Skinny Haven Restaurant 5 7712 Edinger Avenue Easy Street Bar 6 7722 Edinger Avenue Market Center Barbars 7 7732 Edinger Avenue Weight Watchers 8 7738 Edinger Avenue Eveready Lighting Center 9 7742 Edinger Avenue Cheap Charlie's Warehouse 10 7744 Edinger Avenue Hugh J. Quist, DDS 11 7800 Edinger Avenue The Arden Gallery 12 7800 Edinger Avenue Angels Home Iffprovement Center 13 7812 Edinger Avenue Mercury Savings and Executive Offices 14 7812 Edinger Avenue, 2nd Floor Shellrose Corp. 15 7812 Edinger Avenue, 3rd Floor Hermes Financial Corp: 16 7830 Edinger Avenue American Savings Bank G 1 7872 Edinger Avenue Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. 2 7880 Edinger Avenue Marie Callender's Pie Shop 3 7902 Edinger Avenue First Interstate Bank 4. 7942 Edinger Avenue Arby's Roast Beef 5 16001 Beach Boulevard Mobil Service Station 6 7945 Aldrich Avenue Peppertree Preschool 7 NWC Aldrich and Beach Chevron Car Wash Source: Katz Hollis Survey and Huntington Beach Department of Development Services. K1tzHollis (3) Sub-Area C Sub-Area C is a triangular-shaped area of 14.3 acres bounded by the San Diego Freeway to the northeast, Huntington Village Way to the west, and Center Drive to the south. Contained within the' North Hun- tington Center Specific Plan, Sub-Area C is a mixed use development known as One Pacific Plaza, the northern portion of a 30-acre residen- tial/commercial project approved by the Huntington Beach Planning Com- mission in 1976. The original site plan has been modified three times since approval. . Three structures within .Sub-Area C have been completed, two are under construction, and three more are planned. At full build- out, the area will contain a total of 609,700 square feet of development and will be served by three parking structures containing 2308 parking spaces. The San Diego Freeway is a natural boundary for the Project Area because of the unity of the commercial district and separation from the residential area to the north. Sub-Area C is included in the Project for planning purposes and because improvements to the configuration of the southbound Freeway exit ramp and Center Drive are important to .the office and commercial areas along Center Drive. This Sub-Area is included in the Project Area for several addi- tional reasons: in order to plan and carry out the Project as a uniform .whole; to impose uniform requirements over a geographically defined and identified area of the City; and because property in this Sub-Area will share in the physical, social and economic benefits which will accrue to the Project Area through the elimination of blighting conditions, spe- cifically the correction of deficiencies in circulation-related public improvements such as Center Drive. The area is served by two egress/ingress points on Center Drive and two on Huntington Village Way. Traffic flow from the I-405 ramps is indirect and awkward. Access between this Sub-Area and the Huntington ' Center is hampered because there is no direct alignment of the Hunting- ton Center driveways with Huntington Village Way and the One Pacific Plaza driveway. In recognition of the traffic that would be generated by the new developments, the Conditional Use Permit (No. 83-28) required the devel- oper to prepare an updated traffic report to analyze parking and traffic impacts on the surrounding public streets. The report was approved by- the Department of Public Works and the developer was required to comply with all recommendations of the approved report including financing of the installation of a traffic signal on Center Drive. (II-4) KatzHollis (4) Sub-Area D The northern portion of Sub-Area D contains a 200 foot wide swath -of right-of-way to accommodate Southern California Edison Company's high voltage overhead transmission lines, clearly visible in Plate 1. The Southern Pacific Railroad, viewed in Plate 14, runs north-south along the western boundary of . the Huntington Center shopping center with an Orange County ;.Flood Control District channel adjacent to the railroad. The Huntington Center shopping center occupies 58 acres in the remainder of the area, with 79% of the property devoted to 3,950 surface parking spaces. A view of the relationship of the transmission lines, One Pacif- ic Plaza in Sub-Area C, and the Huntington Center can be seen in Plates 1, 3 and 6. Another view of the lines is exhibited in Plate 13. The Huntington Center is comprised of an enclosed mall with three major department stores, forty-four smaller stores, and six kiosk busi- nesses. A separate building to the east, shown in Plate 7, contains twelve businesses, and there are five satellite buildings that front on Edinger Avenue, each occupied by a single business: a service station, a bank, and three "tires-batteries-accessories" outlets. The Center's total . square footage of gross leasable space is 838,715. The alignment of the eastern building and five satellite buildings in relation to the main center, together with the names and locations of existing busi- nesses, is exhibited on Map 5. Building locations can also be seen in the aerial photographs in Plates 1 and 3. Views . of the center from Edinger Avenue are. shown in Plate 5. The photograph in Plate 2 was taken just after the Center opened in November, 1966 and shows that south of Edinger Avenue was nearly vacant at that time. (5) Sub-Area E South of Edinger Avenue and bounded on the west by the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, Sub-Area E contains four free-standing buildings of recent construction containing seven businesses, a kiosk, and an L-shaped building with a typical strip commercial lay-out con- taining eighteen businesses. The facade of the larger building has a uniform treatment and coordinated signage for the individual businesses. The surface parking lot is landscaped and lighted. Major tenants in- clude a grocery store, a drug store and discount appliance store. There are some problems with the mix of uses, as not all tenants are busines- ses appropriate for a neighborhood-serving commercial area (see Plate 8) . The lot at the southwestern corner of Edinger Avenue and Sher (refer to Plates 1, 2 and 8) is vacant, the site of a former service station. (6) Sub-Area F Development on this block appears disjointed, a mixture of office and retail uses occupying structures of varying ages and types of con- struction. The eastern portion of the area depicted in Plate 9, top, con- (II-5) 4 (pM 3L • a w w _....., .. ... .. .,. _ --- i � � I ..� f. tl t`i EE �tf cp• ---- - ww... . . t EIII, +.1 Ywf l.•ff fgfJ•a �.J[.fafY .` •.f1[wt_r. r. �.• i w1Wf.� G..M[MA ♦Vrt�f4f �. lfew� wane+ ti, e.�w ne+sw vfn. HUNTINGTON CENTER w—elo. ...c. cow... ... vw r.c.o..0 ..ow.it.. HUNTINGTON CENTERCO I7at I l DISTRICT RED EVE ENT'ROJEI 0� S CT - M Pf 5 Katz Iiol l is tains a freestanding bank building plus two multi-story office build- ings including interior parking. A service station at the southeast corner of Edinger and Sher has been converted to a retail outlet. . Twelve businesses are contained in a large linear building that faces Edinger Avenue. Although the western portion of the area. has a row of six smaller businesses with relatively recent facade treatments of a similar standard (see Plate 8, bottom) , the remainder of the area has no uniformity of signage or facade design to give the area a sense of cohe- siveness. Indeed much of the remainder of the main building appears dilapidated and uninviting, bordering on obsolescence. There is evidence of shifting uses such as a former grocery store converted to a building supply center. In addition, many businesses are service oriented which tends to generate comparatively lower sales volumes than other types of retail outlets. The parking lot is not landscaped. There are no design features to link the retail development in this area to the retail development directly_ north across Edinger Avenue in Huntington Center or to the commercial blocks to the east and west in Sub-Areas E and G. Internal circulation in this Sub-Area is confusing and difficult. (7) Sub-Area G This commercial block south of Edinger Avenue and to the east of Beach Boulevard depicted in Plate 10 contains six independent busi- nesses in free-standing structures fronting on Edinger Avenue, a service station/car wash on Beach Boulevard, a pre-school on Aldrich Avenue, and two vacant lots at the northeast corner of Aldrich Avenue and Parkside Lane. The buildings are of various ages and types of construction,- in standard condition, but with no uniform presentation or cohesive design. The pre-school on Aldrich Avenue occupies a converted single family residence, and another former single family residence is used as an office and storage facility by an adjoining restaurant. The mixed uses do not complement each other. The vacant land points to underutilization of the area, and development may, be hampered by the multiple ownership of properties on this block. There are seven egress/ingress points on Edinger Avenue and several of, the internal service roads go south through to Aldrich Avenue. There are no curbs and gutters on Aldrich Avenue. It is difficult to exit from the businesses, particularly on Edinger Avenue where virtually the only option is a right turn. The deficiencies in the circulation-related public facilities impact the businesses and potential future development in this Sub-Area. b. Obsolescent Design and Lack of Physical Integration The Project Area to the north and South_ of Edinger Avenue, Sub- Areas D through G, are all retail and personal service oriented busi nesses but there is a lack of physical integration that would give shop- pers the perception that the area is a cohesive and attractive shopping district. There are no paths articulated to encourage internal circulation • (II-6) KatzHollis or natural flow from one sub-area to another. Each sub-area is a disparate separate unit, especially Sub-Area G with its seven egress/- ingress points. The disjointed development in terms of building size and shape, and the lack of sign controls and uniformity in the facade treatments, landscaping and street furniture among the different blocks deters shoppers from viewing the area as a pleasant, large commercial district offering many and varied services. The contrasting character of the buildings (color, materials, form) in the area south of Edinger Avenue, especially Sub-Area F next to Sub-Area E, is particularly noti- ceable. The development of this area occurred over time and does not meet current standards; the physical layout can be considered obsolete. The site plan of the Huntington Center, constructed in 1966 with the separate building of fourteen businesses some hundred feet to the east is an obsolescent design by- contemporary standards. Shoppers pre- fer to remain in a climate controlled environment. To cross an open parking lot subject to the elements to gain access to additional busi- nesses. can contribute to an unpleasant shopping experience. With only 44 mall shops and 6 kiosk businesses to complement its three anchor department stores, the Huntington Center is obsolete and at a competitive disadvantage to other more modern centers often containing over 100 shops. There is also no physical integration of the Huntington Center and one Pacific Plaza. The Southern ' California Edison right-of-way prohibits the integration of these two areas. Although there could be a symbiotic relationship of the office employees and customers of the restaurants and service oriented businesses, and the .retail customers of the commercial area to the south, there are no design features that physically link the two areas or convey a relationship. Circulation paths between the two areas are indirect: ingress/egress points on Center Drive are off-centered from each other. C. Inadequate Public Improvements and Project Area Traffic Conditions (1) Circulation System The street system serving the Project Area contains various de- ficiencies that impede access to the businesses in the Project Area, in- hibit vehicular traffic flow, and detract from pedestrian safety and circulation. These deficiencies have a regional impact in that they af- fect through traffic as well as traffic going to and from the Project Area. In addition, other deficiencies in the regional circulation system, particularly to the north, impact the Project Area's traffic conditions. (II-7) KatzHollis Access to the Project Area is provided by the San Diego Freeway (I-405) , Beach Boulevard, Edinger Avenue, Gothard Street, Center Avenue and McFadden Avenue. The Huntington Beach Circulation Plan identifies Beach Boulevard as a major arterial, Edinger Avenue as a primary arte- rial, and Gothard Street, Center Avenue and McFadden Avenue as secondary arterials. . Traffic volume counts were made this year by Parsons Brinc- kerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Donald Frischer and Associates. The San Diego Freeway, along the northeastern boundary of the Project Area, extends from the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles County to an interchange with Interstate Route 5 in southern Orange County. In the vicinity of the Project Area, the San Diego Freeway has four lanes in each direction and carries approximately 207,000 vehicles per day. The freeway interchange nearest the Project Area is located at Beach Boulevard north of Edinger Avenue. An off-ramp and an on-ramp for . the southbound freeway traffic intersect Center Drive west of Beach Boulevard. The remaining ramps intersect Beach Boulevard. A second on-ramp for southbound freeway traffic intersects Edinger Avenue just east of Beach Boulevard. These ramps are shown graphically on Map 6, -and depicted in Plate 12. Map 6 exhibits clearly the unusual configura- tion of this interchange. Center Drive is an east-west street that extends from Beach Bou- levard to Gothard Street, a distance of approximately two-thirds of a mile along the rear of the existing Huntington Center. At the Beach Boulevard intersection, only southbound Beach Boulevard motorists are permitted to turn onto Center Avenue; northbound left-turning movements to Center Avenue are prohibited. From Center Drive, motorists are permitted to turn either left or right onto Beach Boulevard. At the Gothard Street intersection, the fourth leg of the intersection is a driveway to Golden West College, -opposite Center Drive. The Center Drive cross section varies from two lanes in each direction plus a left turn lane to one lane in each direction plus a left turn lane with parking. The section of Center Drive where parking is permitted occurs between, the main driveway of One Pacific Plaza and the western Huntington Center driveway. One of the recommendations from the One Pacific Plaza traffic report is that parking be prohibited and Center Drive provide two lanes in each direction. Edinger Avenue is an east-west street that extends from Bolsa Chica Street to. the Newport Freeway, State Route 55. Edinger Avenue has three lanes in each direction with a median. Left turn access to the Huntington Center is permitted only at the three signalized intersec- tions. Left turn access to the commercial area on the south side of Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and -the railroad tracks is per- mitted at the three signalized intersections as well as . two. additional unsignalized locations. The intersections are depicted on Map 7, and illustrated in Plate 11. The daily two way volume on Edinger Avenue is 35,500 vehicles. (II-8) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . c O E > McFadden Ave. :: .. d v m ca r t �O O i vo T - S is m _O '. a, _� { P�t€IFIC' P�A�A : r4M4 � . ■ PROJECT AREACc k ....... \ cn ` #TCT.QI CENTER z. < \ a J . x as �{ :1 XC, so �A ...v. a 1-405 ACCESS TO PROJECT AREA SOURCE:PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF KatzHollis DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT"PROJECT MAP 6 i I tip monsoon ■ ■ \ � � I NU P.?AR," ED • CENTER DRIVE ..••.off♦ 1 I �D15CN EASEMENT �♦♦ I 1 3 I q I � I HUNTINGTON CENTER ■ � I Q o I UI J ❑ 4 .EDINGER .m. �� Ar� E:2 '00 — ■ ■ ■ a ■.•.•••..■■■..•.■■.. ■ T �c CURB Cur SIQNAI.® INTERSECTION LB-T7URNLAPE EDI NOER AVENUE: .CURB CUTS AND ITT TURN LAMS SOURCE:KATZ HOLLIS SURVEY HUNTINGTON CENTER KatzHollis D STRICT REDEVELOPMEN COMMERCIAL PROJECT MAP 7 Katz Hollis i Gothard Street is a north-south street, located along the west boundary of the Project. The street extends south from McFadden Avenue to Garfield Avenue. Gothard Street has two traffic lanes and a bicycle lane in each direction plus a two-way, left-turn lane. Curb parking is prohibited. The daily two way volume on Gothard Street is 16,500 vehi- cles. McFadden Avenue is an east-west street that runs from the eastern part of the City of Santa Ana to Bolsa Chica Road in the City of Hunt- ington Beach. West of Huntington Village Way, McFadden Avenue has two lanes in each direction and painted left-turn lanes. East of Huntington Village Lane, there is one lane in each direction and left-turn lanes. The daily two-way volume on McFadden Avenue is 11,700 vehicles. Beach Boulevard, State Route 39, is a north-south highway located along the east boundary of the Project. The highway extends from the Pacific Highway in Huntington Beach to the City of La Habra. In the Project Area, the street has three lanes in each direction, a curbed median with left-turn lanes, and right-turn lanes at the freeway ramps, at Center Drive, and at Edinger Avenue. The daily two way volume on Beach Boulevard is 68,850 vehicles. The Southern Pacific Railroad Company has a single track extend- ing in a north-south direction along the west side of the Project Area shown in Plate 14. There are grade crossings at McFadden Avenue, Center Avenue and Edinger Avenue controlled by gates and flashing signals. Train activity is minimal, usually no more than one or two movements per day. The existing PM peak hour traffic volumes leading into the Proj- ect Area are shown on Map 8. The PM peak hour was selected for analysis because the PM peak typically has higher volumes than the AM peak, par- ticularly near retail centers. Estimated PM peak hour traffic volumes for the Edinger Avenue and Center Drive intersections leading into the Huntington Center are shown on Map 9. Traffic signals are located in the Project Area as follows: Edinger Avenue/Beach Boulevard Edinger Avenue/Parkside Lane Edinger Avenue/Sher Lane Edinger Avenue just east of railroad tracks Edinger Avenue/Gothard Street Center Avenue/Beach Boulevard Center Avenue/Freeway Ramps Center Avenue-college driveway/Gothard Street McFadden Avenue/Gothard Street-Vermont Street . i (II-9) - - — -------- �--50 o , c ♦-385 i l t -^200 ¢' S t t -- 540— 0 ao 0 0 , 6eo 0 235"-` N N E � McFadden Ave. U) v o coc co o ONE PACIFIC PLAZA r M Center o co U, 155 D►� l • Co T' �--25 1 '�� 5� 200 ? .t 1 388 g x o t 6 �s p r ��6'p 995 x N r, 60 L o �n 39 Edinger Ave. R orno 45 �\ o un 220 L o o �1 15 ,` ' 0 � 0 � 33 000 c Lo Tv r 925 t cO ---1090 1 1 � Al-80 1 220 N . l. .j 'r'60 520—• t t 60 'f t t 1 15 0 0 0 ' 440-� ti N 1060 ao N o 1 190—► o v co / 515 ` ) •- 60^& to N \ 60^► EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (P,M. PEAK HOUR) • SOURM PARSONS 'BRINCKERHOFF KatzHollis HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL MAP 8 DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1 c o E > 1 McFadden Ave. cn > m � Vo t6 c Co O 3 rn ONE PACIFIC PLAZA 2 j � N t Center 00 N N CD CIO CV) CMt C Q a HUNTINGTON CENTER Lo 1 N t I cm 010 �� CV')CO t . Edinger Ave. c U U U Y a EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER VOLUMES (P. M. PEAK. HOUR) SQURCE:PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF HUNTINGTON CENTER KW HOI BS D STRICT RED VELD MENCOMMERCIAL PROJECT MAP 9 KatzHollis An addition signal is scheduled to be installed shortly at the intersection of McFadden Avenue and Huntington Village Way, to be paid for by the developer of One Pacific Plaza as a condition of .development approval. All of the traffic signals along Edinger Avenue have separate left turn phases for east-west traffic and at Beach Boulevard there is also a separate left turn phase for north-south traffic. The remaining traffic signals have two phases except at the last intersection where there is a left-turn phase for McFadden Avenue and separate phases for Gothard Street and for Vermont Street. (2) Street Capacity and Levels of Service The traffic engineering firms performed analyses of capacity and level of service of PM peak hour volumes at the signalized intersections in the Project Area, in accordance with the standard procedures of the National Academy of Science's Transportation Research Board. The level of service is obtained from the critical volume/saturation ratio. The lower the ratio, the better the level of service. A ratio of 1.0 is capacity level of service E. Level of service ranges from A, which in- dicates little or no delay, to F which indicates high vehicle - delay. Typically in urban areas, level of service A, B, C, and D are considered acceptable, although most motorists become impatient at "D" level inter- sections and thus seek to avoid them. Existing levels of service during the PM. peak hour at the signalized intersections are summarized in Table II-2. Except at the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue, the existing level of service in the Project Area is acceptable. The level of service at the Beach/Edinger intersection is "E" and the volume is nearing capacity. Although the level of service at the signalized entrances into the Huntington Center are acceptable when analyzed separately, the quality of flow along Edinger is probably less than "A" because of the proximity of the existing traffic signals between Gothard and Beach. For example, the City presently employs a special signal operation at Edinger and Parkside when the eastbound queue at Beach extends beyond Parkside. The traffic signal operation is "pre-empted" and the FdInger, Avenue traffic receives a red indication so that the intersection is not blocked. An analysis of future - traffic generated by the redevelopment project is contained in the Project EIR, which concludes that the inter- sections expected to be impacted the most by future redevelopment are Beach and Edinger, Beach and Center, Edinger and Gothard, and, Center and the I-405 ramps. The existing level of service of these intersec- tions is E, C, C, and D respectively. Without further improvements, the level of service of these intersections is expected to worsen, according I (II-10) Katz Holt is 092184 mnJAIIMC1 Table II-2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Caw ercial District Redevelopment Project EXISTIlM AND FUTURE INITRSCTICN LEVELS OF SERVICE PBQA Analysis Frischer Frischer of Existing PBOD Analysis Analysis of Analysis of Level of of Future Level Service (PM Volume/ Service (PM of Service Intersection Peak Hour) Capacity Peak Hour) (PM Peak Hour) Beach/Edinger — — E F Edinger/Gothard — — C D Edinger/Parkside — — A C Edinger/Sher — — A A Edinger/West Entrance — - A B McFadderV'Gothard B .60 A B Gothard/Center B .60 A C Center/I405 Ranps D .88 D F Beach/center C .77 B D. Center/One Pacific Plaza — — — A Center/Huntington Village A .37 - — Sources: Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., 'Huntington Center Camiercial District Redevelopment EIR Traffic Report,- 9/14/84 and Donald Frischer & Associates, -Traffic Engineering Study: One Pacific Plaza,- 3/9/84. KatzHolhs to the EIR traffic engineering consultants. The Beach and Edinger intersection is expected to reach on "F" level of service, as reported in Table II-2. Level 'F' is defined as "forced flow,' where congestion on the cross street or at downstream intersections restricts or prevents the movement of traffic at the intersection. The. Beach/Edinger inter- section is already perceived to be one of the worst in the county by local residents and shoppers. (3) Circulation Deficiencies on Edinger Avenue and Center Drive The traffic engineering consultants estimate that 79% of users of the Huntington Center gain access from Edinger Avenue. In addition to the three signalized intersections on Edinger to the west of Beach Bou- levard within the Project Area boundary, there are an additional seven egress/ingress points on the north side and sixteen ingress/egress points on the south side. Most of these are right turn in/right turn out because of the median along Edinger Avenue. The sudden and frequent turn movements of motorists using these twenty-three curb cuts, in addi- tion to the signalized intersections with controlled left turn movements impedes traffic flow considerably. Map 7 shows the location of these curb cuts, signals and left turn lanes. Photographs of the three sig- nalized intersections are shown in Plate 11. The three traffic signals on Edinger Avenue along with those on Gothard and Beach means that there are five (5) traffic signals within approximately one-half mile distance. Typical traffic signal spacing on urban arterial streets is one-quarter mile minimum (3 per half-mile) in order to maintain progression on the arterial street. often this spacing must be reduced to provide a traffic signal for a special generator like a shopping center which would result in four (4) traffic signals in one-half mile. distance. The existing Huntington Center_ site has access to all of the three traffic signals (West Entrance, Sher, Parkside) on Edinger. The strip. commercial area on the. south side is separated into three sections bounded by the SPRR and Beach Boulevard and separated by Sher Lane and Parkside Lane. Each of the two west sections have access to two of the three traffic signals while the section between Parkside Lane and Beach Boulevard consists of individual parcels that have access onto Edinger Avenue and Aldrich Avenue to the south. The strip commercial section between the SPRR and Sher Lane allows easy on-site east-west flow to provide access to the West Entrance and the Sher Lane signals. The section between Sher Lane and Parkside Lane allows on-site east-west flow; however, it is not as easy because of the staggered buildings. The section between Parkside Lane and Beach Boulevard has no on site east-west flow but is serviced by Aldrich Avenue. If one of these traffic signals were to be removed, Huntington Center traffic could easily access the remaining two traffic signals. - The majority of the strip commercial on the south could still be served by the traffic signals. (II-11) Katz Hol 1 is Another difficult element of vehicular circulation is the inter- action between the commercial properties east and west of the Southern Pacific Railroad on the north side of Edinger Avenue. Presently, any traffic between the areas east and west of the railroad tracks must use Edinger Avenue or Center Drive because there are no other railroad crossings. Providing an at-grade connection between the two commercial areas would alleviate some of the burden on Edinger Avenue and Center Drive, because shoppers would be able to circulate internally between the two areas without having to use Edinger Avenue or Center Drive. The Center Drive access to the Project Area, along with Hunting- ton Village Lane, result in four "T" intersections on Center Drive in approximately one quarter mile. Consequently, any interaction between the sites north and south of Center Drive results in travel on Center for short distances. It would be beneficial to Center Drive traffic to align the two Huntington Center driveways with Huntington Village Way and the One Pacific Plaza driveway. This would allow direct flow be- tween the center, One Pacific Plaza and McFadden Avenue. (4) Other Circulation Deficiencies The I-405 interchanges with Beach. Boulevard and Golden West Street suffer from heavy volumes which impair traffic flows along Golden West Street, Beach Boulevard and at the intersection of Center Drive and Beach Boulevard. The extension of Gothard Street north to Bolsa Avenue to link with Hoover Street in the City of Westminster has been suggested as a means of alleviating these problems. Such an extension would pro- vide a continuous north-south corridor between Garfield Avenue and Gar- den Grove Freeway and could divert an estimated 5,000-7,500 vehicles. Due to the location of emergency facilities in both Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster, an additional benefit of a Gothard Street- Hoover Street extension would be an improvement in the response time of emergency vehicles in both cities. A partial interchange to/from the north of Gothard Street on I-405 could divert an additional 3,000-5,000 vehicles to Gothard Street- from the Center Drive/Beach Boulevard and I-405 interchange. Access to the Huntington Center from -the I-405 southbound ramp is awkward and constricted. Expansion of the Center Drive interchange to provide a direct connection to the Center, plus the addition of a through lane westbound on Center Drive, could help relieve traffic. flow problems on Edinger Avenue and Center Drive resulting from I-405 exist- ing traffic. , (5) Summary of Inadequate Public Improvements The inadequate public improvements in the Project Area are re- lated to traffic circulation exclusively and can be summarized as fol- • lows: (II-12) hatz,11011is -- Intersections with present level of service ratings C through E: - Beach/Edinger Edinger/Gothard Center/L-405 Ramps Beach/Center -- Edinger Avenue deficiencies: - excessive (twenty-three) curb cuts - awkward circulation, especially between Huntington Center and• the businesses on the south_ side one unnecessary traffic signal -- Railroad tracks acting as a barrier between properties on east and west; tracks can only be crossed on Center Drive and Edinger Avenue -= Center Drive: Huntington Village Way and driveways from Huntington Center and One Pacific Plaza are not aligned. • -- I-405 interchanges with Beach Boulevard and Golden West Street suffer heavy traffic volumes which could be re- iieved through connstruction of an additional interchange at Gothard. -- I-405 southbound ramp at Center Drive has heavy traffic volumes and awkward configuration for flow into Hunting- ton Center and One Pacific Plaza. -- Gothard Street dead ends at McFadden Avenue,, rather than continuing north to act as another north-south arterial serving the area. The above traffic circulation problems have a heavy impact upon the Project Area in terms of its attractiveness to potential shoppers. For the commercial businesses within the Project Area to remain compe- titive, the tr-affic circulation problems must be addressed. An essen- tial element in solving such problems is the need to anticipate and encourage growth within the Huntington Center, One Pacific Plaza, and the area south of Edinger. Huntington Center, in particular, must revitalize and grow to keep pace with its trade area competition. The City of Huntington Beach has a direct stake in such growth. As de- scribed in more detail below, a decline in gross retail sales is reflected in a corresponding decline in sales tax revenues. (II-13) KatzHollis B. Existing Social Conditions Indices of social conditions within a redevelopment project -are generally related to the population within the project area, either directly such as population characteristics, income levels, employment and unemployment, etc. , or indirectly such as the 'availability of re- creation facilities to serve the population, or the extent and nature of crime in project area neighborhoods. In a redevelopment project which has no resident population within its boundary, as is the case with the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project, there are no social indices on which to report. It should be noted, however, that 20% of the tax increment revenues generated by the Project will be set aside for the development or improvement of housing for low and moderate income persons. Although such housing will not be built within the Project Area, it will serve to benefit social conditions in the City. C. Existing Economic Conditions Land uses in the Project Area are devoted entirely to commercial uses (including office) , with the exception of the utility rights-of-way discussed earlier and a small amount of light industrial use in Sub-Area A. The Huntington Center shopping center, containing 838,715 of gross leasable square footage, was built in 1966. Businesses to the south of Edinger Avenue have developed over time. The mixed use development to the north of Center Avenue, One Pacific Plaza, has been planned since 1976. Construction of the first phase, an office building and two restaurants, has been completed. 1. Economic Disuse Resulting from Faulty Planning Faulty planning of the circulation system in the Project Area has impeded full utilization of its economic potential. Awkward access gen- erally contributes to discouraging retail shoppers from utilizing retail outlets in the area. The intersection of Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue has a service level of 'E' as discussed previously. Both Edinger Avenue and Beach Boulevard experience heavier traffic than would prevail if Gothard Street was linked to Hoover Street north of the San Diego Freeway, and a partial interchange was available. The flow of traffic on Edinger Avenue is interrupted by the eight eastbound left turn lanes, and 23 curb cuts, with traffic . entering into and exiting from the various curb cuts in an uncontrolled manner. Pedestrians are discouraged from moving from one portion of the Project Area to another by the distances separating the various areas, the lack of clearly articulated paths, and the absence of a unifying ar- chitectural theme. (II-14) Katz Hol 1 i s The right-of-way for the high voltage overhead transmission lines on the north side of Huntington Center is a land use that may be inap- propriate to current needs for a commercial area. It could be argued that the highest and best use for the - land occupied by the lines would be for expansion of the area's commercial uses. The 200 foot-wide. right-of-way creates a significant barrier between the commercial development of One Pacific Plaza to the north of Center Drive and the Huntington Center shopping mall, and contributes to the lack of physical integration of the two areas. The barriers of distance, awkward street circulation and uncoor- dinated physical design are responsible for the lack of physical inte- gration of the Huntington Center and the strip commercial development south of Edinger Avenue. The movement of shoppers from one area to another is impeded, resulting in the loss of economic potential. 2. Existence of Inadequate Public improvements Details of the deficiencies in the street system, and freeway in- terchange design, intersection capacity and pedestrian access were de- scribed in the preceding section. The economic impact of these inade- quate public improvements is that businesses may be discouraged from lo- cating in the area due to the confusing circulation system, and the dif- ficulties caused for potential customers and employees. Similarly, the sales volumes of existing businesses may be reduced. If not corrected, the economic impact of the inadequate public improvements would become greater over time. As conditions in the area get worse, the City would become forced to impose conditions on new development in an attempt to alleviate the circulation problems. Such conditions could result in increased development costs that would serve to further discourage new development and growth in the area. 3. Economic Maladjustment and Impaired Investments Impaired investments in the Project Area have resulted from eco- nomic maladjustment. A key indicator of economic maladjustment is sales performance figures for the Huntington Center over time. The following discussion presents an analysis of retail sales and the loss of poten- tial sales. The deficiencies in the- public improvements serving the area are a key factor. in inhibiting shoppers from utilizing the services offered in the area. The annual retail sales figures for the Huntington Center from 1978 to 1983 are exhibited in Table II-3. While sales figures have risen fairly steadily since 1978, the percentage increase from year• to year has declined from .7.7% between 1979 to 5.1% between 1982 and 1983. Given the rates of inflation during that period, and the resulting price increases, although the sales figures have increased, such figures may reflect little growth in volume. (II-15) 092184 Katz Hol l is mmJNMC mJNMC l • Table II-3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project ANNUAL RETAIL SALES AND RANKING OF HUNTINGTON CENTER WITH OTHER REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS IN LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTIES Change from Same Period of Previous Year Number Sales (000) Number (000) Percent Rank of Units 1978 Total $70,534 -- -- 18 48 1979 Total $75,950 $5,416 7.7% 19 50 1980 Total $73,438 -2,512 -3.3% 23 50 1981 Total $78,651 5,213 7.1% 23 50 1982 Total $80,946 2,295 2.9% 23 48 1983 Total(1) $85,087 4,121 5.1% N/A 48 Source: "Taxable Retail Sales for Regional Shopping Centers in Los An- geles and Orange Counties," Los Angeles Times Marketing Research Department (1) Fourth quarter figures are not yet available. The 1983 total was cal- culated by extrapolation from the first three quarters, applying the average ratio of the first three quarters to the total in 1978-82. KatzHollis A listing of Orange County regional shopping centers and a map of their location are exhibited in Table II-4 and Map l&. A ranking of the . Huntington Center's performance with the sixty other regional shopping centers in the Los Angeles and Orange Counties is included in the data presented in Table II-3. During this period, the Huntington Center's rank has dropped somewhat, from 17 to 23-24. A more specific comparison of the Center's performance in relation to other super-regional centers of similar size in terms of total_ retail area in the bi-county region is provided in Table II-5. The average sales per square foot for Hunting- ton Center in 1982 is $98, while similarly sized centers ranged from $109 to $161 per square foot. The Center owner reports a 1983 figure of $100. Table II-6 provides sales per square foot information on other centers in the Center's trade area. The two centers closest to Hun- tington Center captured $158 and $181 per square foot in 1982. The difference in the sales per square foot figure is in part attributable to the difficult access and confusing circulation system serving the Center. In a 1981 study completed by 'the City of Huntington Beach, retail sales per capita for ten Orange County cities were compared, as shown in Table II-7. The City ranked seventh out of the ten cities, with a 1981 retail sales per capita figure of $3,922, compared to Costa Mesa's . $8,500, Newport Beach's $7,300. and Westminster's $5,700. These other cities contain very successful super-regional shopping centers, such as the South ' Coast Plaza and the Westminster Mall. It appears that the Huntington Center is not attracting the volume of shoppers it could, probably due to the difficulties of access and circulation. Table_ II-8 contains estimates from the July 23, 1984 issue of 'Sales and Marketing Management' magazine showing that Huntington Beach's median household effective buying income ('EBI') is $34,533, higher than that .of Costa Mesa and Westminster, while total EBI estimated for the city was nearly twice that of Costa Mesa and three times that of Westminster. Yet, as shown in Table II-9, an analysis of- per capita retail sales figures for department store-type merchandise (DSTM) shows that in 1983 Costa Mesa's per capita DSTM sales were 355.6% of expected DSTM sales and Westminster's per capita DSTM sales were 188.3% of DSTM sales expected for its population. The derivation of this percentage, know as the sales experience rate, is explained in Table II-9. The 1983 DSTM sales experience rate for Huntington Beach was 96.0%. Rates for Costa Mesa and Westminster are no doubt attributable to the presence of South Coast Plaza and the Westminster Mall, respectively. Table II-9 contains the 1983 sales experience rates for five cities surrounding Huntington Beach, and Table II-10 shows their rates from 1979 to 1983. There has been little change in the rates over time. The contrast of Huntington Beach's sales experience rate of 88.1% to 96.0% and the rates of Costa Mesa (321.1% to .355.6%) and Westminster (188.3% to 196.2%) indicates that Huntington Beach is losing retail sales to its neighboring cities. • (II-16) 092184 KatzHollis mmJNMC1 Table II-4 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS IN ORANGE COUNTY Key to Year Map 10 Regional Shopping Center Completed Major Tenants 1 South Coast Plaza 1967 Bullock's, I. Magnin, May Co. , Nordstrom, Sears, Saks Fifth Avenue 2 Buena Park Mall 1961 May Co., Penney's, Sears 3 Westminster Mall 1974 Buffums, May Co. , Robinson's, Sears 4 Fashion Island 1967 Broadway, Buffums, Bullock's Wilshire, Neiman-Marcus, Robinson's 5 Mission Viejo Mall 1978 Bullocks, May Co. , Mont- gomery Ward, Robinson's 6 Brea Center 1977 Broadway, May Co. , Nord- strom, Sears 7 Mall of Orange 1971 Broadway, Penney's, Sears 8 Laguna Hills Mall 1973 Broadway, Buffums, Penney's, . Sears 9 Huntington Center 1966 Broadway, Penney's, Mont- gomery Ward 10 Anaheim Plaza 1955 Broadway, Robinson's 11 The City 1970 May Co. , Penney's 12 La Habra Fashion Square 1968 Buffums, Bullock's 13 Santa Ana Fashion Square 1958 Bullocks, I. Magnin 14 Honer Plaza 1958 Montgomery Ward Proposed 15 Irvine Center 1985 N/A . --------------- Source: Coldwell Banker Marketing Research Department, 1981 kro ti� .w aAl + w ' IasAl=cclLs coirm _ ' - o/ �+�/`'*■ ' 6eAn1: coulrrll 3. f• y p u HABRA C n o,.ow. 4 "'"•`""' La Habra Fashion SquareLACEMTIA YF„ ;_-Brea Center IVORSA LOM �4r� ,NaVI, l f �i � � •1 O" �MM�00 \ .� uo.0". alb J ■ � � •II .ansu eUE �� 4Y a � � _ yp yM' "Yl•Wn .ar`su nvp At ,dh amawW IN/w•v= '4 Buena Park Mall r• � - - ANAHEIM � •\ u.co..I••n ! s' Anaheim Plaza 3f : i� VILLA Pam CT'PRE" • ■ yy E A w„os .r. G_' �'+.t, '3= Ma~ ll of Orange ,\ un.0 A" �� �� - ORANGE LAB ALAYI /' AYIA.GO fir., 'c...r.r.v, r GARO v i The City _ l arrlArorw _'� ty,�` EEiT111 r: 0.aula` -caov, ■�• Santa Ana Fashion Square - �� SEAM BEACH :�.. . . f�.ywe� t,'�•+., . .�wln.M.nla AVGy Honer Plaza ,F -\ �4 �p y�aa•Ao v'-•oa.o.o WeStminster Mall ..a,,. + r Iaac/. Huntington Centex t POUIfTAIM AMA M~NMIpM wuw/11 w .w'. JI �A WEETMINSiER u--- + ,Ow •. —UN, Aa ar South Coast Plazn �L► ■VeIE �M� LA. MESA ♦r � _ ♦ `1 a 1 Irvine Center HUNTINGTON �n.n � a. _y♦.y c•.we BEACH 'ti�r + i �p/ -/TORO ao•° Laguna Hi11B Mall NEWPOeT �i'Feehlon Ielend' . BFJICN rr.+an A,. s Ca 4 -oOMieeion Viejo Mall d♦♦, a BEACH BAN JUAN b -CA ISTIIwo OANA PONY + J .on ■7 d FIN LJ' _ BAII CI�MENTE . ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS :COW%VEU EUVACM WFMDBI HUNTINGTON CENTER KatzHollis DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AP 10 102484 Katz.Hollis mmJNMC1 Table II-5 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project . COMPARATIVE 1982 SALES PERFORMANCE OF HUNTINGTON CENTER WITH OTHER SELECTED SUPER-REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS* IN LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTIES [*CENTERS OF SIMILAR SIZE] Selected Super-Regional Total Retail Area Average Sales Shopping Center (in Square Feet) Per Square Foot Glendale Galleria, Glendale 868,273 $161 Brea Mall, Brea 855,633 $140 Fox Hills Mall, Culver City 888,543 $138 Mall of Orange, Orange 798,155 $109 Huntington Center, Huntington Beach 826,968(1) $ 98 (1) This 1982 figure varies from the current figure of 838,715 square feet of gross leasable space due to the fluctuations in leased space. Source: "Taxable Retail Sales for Regional Shopping Centers in Los An- geles and Orange Counties," Los Angeles Times Marketing Research Department, December, 1983. 092184 KatZHolfis mmJNMC1 s Table II-6 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project COMPARATIVE 1982 SALES PERFORMANCE OF COMPETITIVE. SUPER-REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS WITH HUNT INGTON CENTER Selected Super-Regional Centers in Huntington Total Retail Area Average Sales Center's Trade Area (in Square Feet) Per Square Foot South Coast Plaza, Costa Mesa 1,645,243 $181 Westminster Mall, Westminster 1,030,238 $158 Laguna Hills Mall, Laguna Hills 798,621 $104 Fashion Island, Newport Beach 1,147,761 $ 99 • Huntington Center, Huntington Beach 826,968(l) $ 98 (1) This 1982 figure varies from the current figure of 838,715 square feet of gross leasable space -due to the fluctuations in leased space. Source: 'Taxable Retail Sales for Regional Shopping Centers in Los An- geles and Orange Counties,' Los Angeles Tines Marketing -Research Department, December, 1983. • 102484 KatzHol11C mmJNMC1 Table II-7 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project RETAIL SALES PER CAPITA, ORANGE COUNTY CITIES, 1981 City Retail Sales Per Capita Costa Mesa 9,500 Newport Beach 7,300 Westminster 5,700 Anaheim 4,409 Santa Ana 4,300 , Fullerton 4,100 Huntington Beach 3,922 Garden Grove 3,600 Irvine 3,387 Fountain valley 3,000 Source: City of Huntington Beach, 1981 • 102484 Katz Hollis mmJNMCl Table II-8 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project EFFECTIVE BUYING INCOME, 1983 Total Median City EBI ($000) Household EBI Huntington Beach $2,554,557 $34,533 Costa Mesa $1,139,635 $28,329 Westminster $ 911,506 $33,361 Source: 'Sales & Marketing -Management' magazine, July 23, 1984. • 102484 Katz Hol l is mmJNWl. Table II-9 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project RETAIL SALES ANALYSIS, 1983 (DEPAR'IMM SrME-TYPE MERCHANDISE) HUNTIMiUN BEACH MARKET AREA (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Estimated 1983 DSTM Per Capita Expected Resultant Population Sales DSTM DSTM Sales Experience City (Number) ( 1$ ,000) Sales ($) Sales ($) Rate ($) Costa Mesa 85,644 $ 410,048 $4,788 $1,347 355.6% Westminster 72,092 182,843 2,536 1,347 188.3% Newport Beach .65,682 140,289 2,135 1,347 158.5% Huntington Beach 118,667. 222,228 1,244 1,347 96.0% Santa Ana 219,019 204,912 936 1,347 69.5% 5-CITIES TOTAL 621,104 $1,160,320 $1,868 $1,347 138.7% (1) Estimates shown are as of I/1/83. Provided by California Department of Finance, Pcpula- tion Research Unit. (20 "DM? means department store-type merchandise: apparel, general merchandise, home fur- nishings and appliances. (3) Derived by dividing column (2) by column (1). (4) Derived by dividing orange County 1983 DSTM sales of $2,744,042,000 by estimated 1983 population of 2,037,131. (5) Derived by dividing column (3) by column (4). Source: Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. • �r =r 102484 Katz Hollis mmJNMCl Table II-10 Huntington .Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project DSTM(l) SALES EXPERIENCE RATES(2), . 1979-1983 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Costa Mesa 321.1% 331.3% 342.8% 343.9% 355.6% Westminster 194.4% 190.0% 191.3% 196.2% 188.3% Newport Beach 174.1% 170.4% 178.4% 158.9% 158.5% Huntington Beach 89.7% 88.1% 88.2% .89.9% 96.0% Santa Ana 81.9% .76.1% 68.88 61.2% 69.5% 5-CITIES TOTAL 141.2% 139.1% 138.7% 134.7% 138.7% -------------- (1) "DSTM' means department store-type merchandise: apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. (2) The sales experience rate was derived by comparing the actual per capita DSTM sales to the County-wide average per capita DSTM sales, utilizing population estimates from the California Department of Fi- nance, Population Research unit, and taxable sales figures from the State Board of Equalization, Research and Statistics Division. Source: Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. KatzHollis The Huntington Center should strengthen its position in its market area and take better advantage . of its location. Despite its interest, the private sector is not able to undertake the improvements needed to correct the deficiencies of public traffic and circulation facilities that serve the Project Area businesses. Public assistance is clearly needed to solve these problems. Huntington Center makes an important contribution to the tax base of the City, as revealed in Table II-11, but the Center's share has been declining slowly. The growth in total retail sales city-wide, in terms of percentage increase from year to year, has risen more. rapidly than the growth in retail sales of the Huntington Center. Under utilization of land in the Project Area can be said to be impairing private investments in the area. The utility rights-of-way create barriers to expansion and development and usurps land from an in- come-generating use. The extensive acreage currently devoted to surface parking could accommodate new development if parking spaces were avail- able within the rights-of-way. (II-17) 102484 Katz Hollis mmJNMC1 Table II-10 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project DSTM(1) SALES. EXPERIENCE. RATES(2) , 1979=1983 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Costa Mesa 321.1% 331.3% 342.8% 343.9% 355.6% Westminster 194.4% 190.0% 191.3% 196.2% 188.3% Newport Beach 174.1% 170.4% 178.4% 158.9% 158.5% Huntington Beach. 89.7% 88.1% 88.2% 89.9% 96.0% Santa Ana 81.9% 76.1% 68.88 ' 61.2% 69.5% • 5-CITIES TOTAL 141.2% 139.1% 138.7% 134.7% 138.7% -------------- (1) "DSTM" means department store-type merchandise: apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. (2) The sales experience rate was derived by comparing the actual per capita DSTM sales to the County-wide average per capita DSTM sales, utilizing population estimates from the California Department of Fi- nance, Population Research unit, and taxable sales figures from the State Board of Equalization, Research and Statistics Division. Source: Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. KatzHollis The Huntington Center should strengthen its position in its market area and take better advantage of its location. Despite its interest, the private sector is not able to undertake the improvements needed to correct the deficiencies of public traffic and circulation facilities that serve the Project Area businesses. Public assistance is clearly needed to solve these problems. Huntington Center makes an important contribution to the tax base of the City, as revealed in Table II-11, but the Center's share has been declining slowly. The growth in total retail sales city-wide, in terms of percentage increase from year to year, has risen more rapidly than the growth in retail sales of the Huntington Center. Underutilization of land in the Project Area can be said to be impairing private investments in the area. The utility- rights-of-way create barriers to expansion and development and usurps land from an in- come-generating use. The extensive acreage currently devoted to surface parking could accommodate new development if parking spaces were avail- able within the rights-of-way. • (II-17) u 092184 Katz.Ho lis mmJNMCl i Table II-11 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project. TAXABLE SALES- GENERATED BY HUNTINGTON CENTER COMPARED TO TOTAL TAXABLE SALES IN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (000's Omitted) H U N T I N G T 0 N C E N T E R CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Increase Increase Total From Prior Percent of Total Sales From Prior Sales(1)- Year Citywide (2) Year 1978 $70,534 N/A 12.9% $542,740 12.3% 1979 75,950 9.7% 12.0% 633,152 16.6% 1980 73,438 (3.38) 11.0% 668,778 5.6% 1981 78,651 7.18 10.6% 743,217 11.1% 1982 80,946 2.9% 10.8% 750,405 1.06% 1983 85,067(3) 5.1% 8.8% . 886,921 18.2% (1) Source: "Taxable Retail Sales for Regional Shopping Centers in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, 1978 ,through 1982" Los Angeles Times Marketing. Research Department, December, 1983. (2) Retail Sales only from "Taxable Sales in California," Annual and Quarterly Reports for 1978 through 1983, State Board of Equaliza- tion, Research and Statistics Division. (3) Fourth quarter figures are not yet available. 'The 1983 total was calculated by extropolation from the first three quarters, applying the average ratio of the first three quarters to the total 'in 1978- 1982. • = I � ' � K�• '�_ ,` _ - �•+ •,� _ ! .yi�` I Ili � JUL ,{ Tk sLi�l Ar or LU LU \ ,//;/, � I �.src»e•';.. � 11 <yN y� �` � (� ',�^i+� �'•� /� � 3 Y7•tL3'a7•..;.c'� .Ilr�''r. "'I�CuY,:' i � ! �1 ''•'�•.� ♦' QIC o' u v_i R' In. l lit ■ n T 4 a 1 rs:3mfi c �l .J / •T/�� r ' ... 1 E•�� ^C�`i.�i+� � I 1'�' is ..r. ; .i 4' j S. �rtt'•� I / — ,c Ck� t l.i' t ,;, ��' r ;t ii�� 4.�.� �f f}', �Ott-1,�f ,a'� j; �.. t ; it AP r �J , l\\ ; l,. •1'� � 4j/I� � r 1 I �'�s f d Iif`� � �,,r � 1 � �1 , � r / 1 `" r -- ' 1.1 F r ,.•�1��I N`'S k-� Il C ( i` I�iy ..'.r L�'� ^� •x� ,�J �,. _ - • tj 1. 7t Y �1 !l`1 a1r�, A ORO tt > S � 'rtu� t li u:r ,i• is i t r , • (1 11 t'11���r �a +� (df�t•. ! � �'��-R fir„ { +�. ' / J1{Q, j�` 1 }y��'d l x N L'�y 1 1k4.• +� 5 Zlt • I' { 1f of '�'� �'. rl.,, t f17 T t •t cl. � ,�' A� i �� ��Ij�� � �t.�,.4ti ��4 w• c�' `��{'I�F, -;4l 1 t .�' r �� �� �'t -R + rMl}, Ilj t'�.I l fl• ;{T.4, \r � R� J�fit�. r• 5 I. t I 7 r. � ��I�:.: y 1 e f11..;. t,Y.ax �' 1`' 1 F • k i �( t,l �t �_�`r 1��. ,y Y; .T+� sort] 7 . ' iti I I "•� i t fl .n t 0 vz 00 ° o o© � � o 0. o 00 m° ¢ �Zc" Q" O°'a ° - (n��p q,$o c�..�/�.-/'//'� e¢ �" CJ ^ O o o c., ,• C.Jp G o ° vm° .o o ' o o ° s¢ c o °by cp o1 ��0��`� o Rio ° AIL $'L` 0 0.• Q g p O• V of © °o. �O Q O O_ e _ O0� �o d OCQ o. G..,.._.,.- b •cS � O o. `�n G co6° o -.moo 4=ao� (f'°oo p _ G AA m oXJ ° o f 9 .n�o � � � � � O �°°.•pCN o :. o M e°mco Qa� ° p d // ¢o o o o o Q ora oo ' o O ooup c� o moo oR oo; .G��-af r• _ _� °ac� q o gogo -T(:Z. o El O e /p.s 6a n /7� °em°s �i, e � e a o o � q p o Q ° O Ll O p G 0 View of Project Area from the west, 1982.. a��� ��REDEVELOPMENT DD�� D��fKa zHoMog ROJEC� e apt•✓� -_ r a �-c..t, a -,�-._. � _ - P•N V.;' SUB-AREA A: Truck storage and small office building on McFadden Avenue northeast of Huntington_Village Way intersection. i f, ' II 'ti..}r I:�T.t:'_.r)'�,-. ,�. .7�•..,.4. ::'c_�Lr'" , ,�.;,;tn .5- - SUB-AREA B! View south from McFadden Avenue of Southern California i Edison Company and Southern Pacific Railroad rights-of-way. KdtZ Holt is HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLATE 4 SUB-AREA D: r v k Pm Huntington Center viewed from Edinger Avenue. :o Western end. Main entrance. Eastern end. Katz Holt is HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL PLATE 5 DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT • • FROM THE NORTH ' � � _ �� � �~r••�r••�� �� � Tom` :.K� 44 AL 42 Of HIITINGTON CENTER COMMERCI AL KatzHollis DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT t :l e PROJECT • HUNTINGTON CENTER (SUB-AREA D): BUILDING EAST OF THE ENCLOSED MALL ffi go, s'F�•`a d )C--t,; ,x a i1 �1 sie vnias® � y ------ -Wi t orwt}.lti� t� 5 tyy - �_ Katz Holt iS DISTRICT EDEVELOPMENTn PROJECT PLATE 7 SUB-AREA E P.O. v: 117 View of western portion. __'imifte a View of the-vacarit lot at the southwest cornerof Edinger Avenue and Sher-Lane. Katz HOl I lS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT"PROJECT CT PLATE .8 - SUB-AREA F i r_ a wil View of area from northwest. BIKES•TOYS•TRIM:A•TkE BABY -AAT10•GARDEN• POOLSRIAMIN Central portion of main building. cd�l CLEANERS _Pi ' t Western end of ,-r main building. M,r; HUNTINGTON CENTER AL Katz Hollis . DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT A PROJECT PLATE 9 CT SUB-AREA G i I e i bil ri - d: i - - Intersection of Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue,western portion on right. . � b 3x° a ri~j nA�. `} ^ + :s. fin. `�S�E' •f`� �14.- �.t-- - � _ .rr�j-,i r lr �J �i L x�•-�r�' 'l x*-. J F Y f L1'.-� 'A pin k�S +"'i�`}� ! - ��'{" � - { � t."F! s 'rs'c a�:,..y-s�f SS _ nt-.' K '.A �l'Clt' ;�•srtL } ; � J i.. �� ! Y .L' Eastern portion. KdtZ Holt is HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL .PLATE 10 DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INTERSECTIONS ON EDINGER AVENUE lz _ Beach Boulevard: view from southwest. Parkside Lane: view from north. = =- Sher Lane: view from northwest. • i Intersection of Edinger Avenue and Gothard Street. HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL Katz HOII IS DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLATE 11 f - 1 I DO MOi I 1.1 G4 ��J%^♦�� tA�9�• I I RRONOI. --� I ��r_ S/'- - .. Y•� -1:'�,':SiC.'l' Y.'•. mod Ift '• � , ,.. d ,NAil _ -HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENTDISTRICT PROJECT . .j'' - F i 4ta?'hi��' �T-���'a tjj: •t ' �'F�--ty H��M��r "C.S,. k 7 v 4r yN � i 1 ��• v r . TNI .7k STWr "'h' ' r r�Syr'f•Y' S .�% '�0'�t � ��I�j'.. It �� i r� • • Ell HUNTINGT i 1'��;" � -.i.v - } _ .tom -Jam.•�q.:r�3`.�" r 1,-�..'tom. :�..�: .--* ON COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY r Railroad:crossing at Center Drive. . N,. � - i .,',gay » '4'' 'Su.l. tk' a. ✓� }' f('��,,,a�,�'�,+ i� r�t,��'�Y*`id�l�x_- �+ i d-f ���'w��,a�,�wt���`�r+'��._<��fAy. _4 Y !e ,. I�i �x'� � Y a{ �•.4't't f�.'� ,4'r t, x"- �M ✓4. t t t r Y!�$a 4d l f rc�u�{ _ �. ? r� '�art-'�,` � Jr ' � S to �fn 77 View north from Edinger Avenue, Orange County Flood Control.District channel to the east of. the railroad tracks. KdtZHOIIIS HUNTINGTON. CENTER COMMERCIAL PLATE 14 DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT F' 4 HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEPTEMBER 13, 1984 REVISED OCTOBER 12, 1984 • • f • HUNTINGTON CENTER. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT • REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 General ----------------------------- ------- 1 1.2 Definitions------.-------------------------- --- 1 1.3 Project Area Boundaries ------------------------- -- 2 1.4 Ad ministration and Enforce ment of the Plan --------------- 2 1.5 Duration of Plan --------------------------------- .3 1.6 . Procedure for Amending Plan ------------.------------- 3 2.0 Redevelopment Objectives and Prol-used Actions --------------- 3 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan ---------------- 3 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants ------------------- 5 2.2.1 Rules for Participation Opportunities and Re-Entry Preferences 5 • 2.2.2 Owner Participation Agreements ------------------- 5 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation, Moving of Structures ----------- 5 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures ---------------------- 6 2.3.2 Moving of Structures ------------- .---------------6 2.4 Acquisition of Property -----------------------------6 2.4.1 Eminent Domain --=-------------------------- 6 2.4.2 Property Cwnedby Public Bodies ----------- ------ 6 2.4.3 Property Subject to Owners Participation Agreements----- 7 2.4.4 Property Not Subject to Owner Participation Agreements --- 7 2.4.5 Personal.Property ------------.----- -------- 7 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants------------------------------------ -7 2.6 De mnlition, Clearance, Public Improve ments and Site_Preparation - 8 • 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for uses in Accordance with this Plan ---------------.------------------- 9 3.0 Redevelopment Plan Implementation ------------------- 10 • 3.1 Cooperation with City ------------------------ 10 3.2 Cooperation with other Public Jurisdictions -----------12 3.3 Land Use for Project Area --------------------- 12 3.4 General Development Standards and Require ments------13 3.4.1 Construction ------------------------- 13 3.4.2 Rehabilitation and Retention of Confior ming Uses-- 13 3.4.3. Retention of Existing Nonconfor ming Uses------ 14 3.4.4 Incompatible Uses --------------------- 14 3.4.5 Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels -------- 14 3.4.6 Li m.itation of Building Density------------- 14 3.4.7 Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings -- 14 3.4.8 Open Space, Landscaping and Parking -------- 15 • 3.4.9 Signs ---------------------------- 15 3.4.10 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation ------- 15 3.4.11 Minor Variations---------------- ----- 15 3.4.12 Building Permits =-------------------- 16 3.4.13 Design for Development----------------- 16 3.5 Methods for Project Financing ----------------- 16 3.51 General Description of the Proposed.Financing Method 16 3.5.2 Tax Increments -----------------=------- 17 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes --------------- 18 3.5.4 Loans and Grants ---------------------- 18 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens --------------- 18 3.5.6. Financing Limitations ------------------ 18 Exhibit A - Project Area Boundary Map ------------------ 21 • Exhibit B = Project Area Legal Description _______ _ 22 Exhibit C jr ________General Plan Land Uses of Pro ct Area - 23 Exhibit D - Public Improvements ---------------------- 24 Exhibit E: - Diagra m Illustrating Approxi mate A mount of Open Space 25 HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT . REDEVELOPMENT PLAN LO INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This Redevelopment Plan for the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project was prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq., the California Constitution and all applicable local haws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Huntington Center Commercial District Project Area as described in this Plan confor ms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council and as thereafter amended. This proposed Redevelopment Plan is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Co m mission on August 7, 1984. The Plan was prepared because of the need to correct problems within the project area boundaries, including problems relative to circulation, • parking, under-utilization of cc m mercial land, to stimulate economic activity and to assist the private sector in the rehabilitation of commercial land, thereby providing incentive for construction of additional cc m mercial uses. The present circulation proble ms are the result of regional traffic . patterns and cannot be alleviated by.-the private sector.alone. Needed i mprove ments include the Provision of a ne w on and off-ra mp fro m the 405 freeway at Gothard, modification of the existing off-ramp at.Beach Boulevard and the extension of Gothard Avenue north to connect with Hoover Street. Also needed is the elimination of some of the many curb cuts along Edinger Avenue, which impede traffic flow, and a comprehensive signalization program to facilitate movement through the .intersection. Coupled with the proposed actions within the Project Area.These improvements will provide for a cohesive revitalization program that wM physically upgrade the area to make it more competitive with the other commercial areas in Orange County, thus enabling the City of Huntington Beach to participate more fully in the benefits of a healthy econo mic base. 1.2 Definitions The following definitions will govern . in the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise indicated in the text. "Agency" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington • Beach, California or any successor in interest (0130D) -1- Redevelopment Plan "City" means the City of Huntington Beach, California. "City Council' means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "County" means the County of Orange, California. "Legal Description". means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared in accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". "Map„ means the Project Area Mal, for the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A"• "Person" means any individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Planning Co m mission" means the City Planning Co m mission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. . "Project" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Project Area" means the area included within the boundaries of the Huntington . Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project area as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit 11B." "Redevelopment Law" means the Co.m munity Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Califomia Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et seq.), as amended tD date. "State" means the State of California. "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a .special fund of the Agency in the manner provided b� Sections 33670 to 33677, inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Law 'and Article XVI, Section.16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The legal description of the Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The ad ministration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents. implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. • The provisions of this Plan or other docu ments entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such re medies may include, but are not limited (0130 D) -2- Redevelopment-Plan to, specific performance, damages, reentry, injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisions which • are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run in . perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council. 1.6 Procedure for'A mending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the 1rocedure established in the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established bylaw. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelop ment Plan fn creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and in particular those areas within the City which have beco me blighted because of deterioration, .disuse, and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts, the Huntington Beach • Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Huntington Center Co mercial District Redevelopment Project Area. Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: The elimination of environmental deficiencies including among others aging, deteriorating and poorly maintained structures, relocation of utilities, mo6ficaticon and improvements to the onsite and offsite circulation, and increased and i mproved.Farking. The replanning, redesign, and develop ment of underutilized areas.. -- The e1i minati6n and mitigation of existing and anticipated visual, econo mic, physical, social, and environmental blight within the Project Area. The rehabilitation recycling, and development of property within a creative, coordinated land use pattern in the Project Area 'consistent with the goals, policies, objectives, standards, guidelines, and require menu asset forth in the adopted General Plan and Zoning Crdinance. The implementation of techniques to mitigate blight characteristics resulting from exposure to highway and public right-of-way corridor activity affecting adjacent properties within-the Project Area. • (01.30D) -3- Redevelopment Plan — Beautification activities to eliminate those forms of blight including, but not li.mi.ted to, visual blight, in order to encourage co m munity identity. — The encouragement, promotion, and assistance in the development and • expansion of local co m merce. Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development of these facilities and by.providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed ne w co m m ercial facilities. Mitigating development limitations which result in the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area of such an extent that it constitutes a physical, social, and econo mic burden on the co m munity which cannot reasonably be expected o be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. To provide for affordable Mousing as required by county, region, or state law and requirements, as necessary and desirable, consistent with the goals and objectives of the co m munity, its General Plan, and Housing Ele ment To encourage the coordination, cooperation, and assistance of county, state, and federal agencies as may be dee med necessary to ensure that projects undertaken by this Agency are imply mented to their fullest and most practical extent The achieve ment of a physical environ ment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural and urban design principles deemed important by the co m m unity. • To encourage co m munity involvement and citizen participation in the adoption of policies, progra ms and projects so as to ensure that the Redevelop ment Plan is implemented in accordance with the objectives and goals of the General Plan. — To provide a procedural and financial mechanism by' which the Agency can assist, co mple ment, and coordinate public.and public and private develop ment, redevelopment, revitalization, and enhancement of the co m munity. Provide for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area businesses in the event displacement is necessary, in accordance with the provisions of the community redevelopment law and the government code of the State .of California. To obtain the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency is authorized to undertake the following imple menting actions: Acquisition of property. Participation by owners and tenants in the redevelopment project Relocation assistance to displaced occupants as required by law. Development of adequate parking, landscaping, public improvements and S facilities. (0130 D) -4- Redevelop ment Plan Demolition and clearance of lzoperties acquired, and site preparation. • — Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners and tenants in the improvement of their properties to carry out the objectives of the redevelopment plan. — Assist in providing financing for private and public development in the Project Area. 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants 2.2.1 Rues for Participation Opportunities and Re-Entry Preferences Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by such factors as the land uses designated for the Project Area; the provision of public facilities; realignment of streets if required; the ability of owners to finance acquisition and development of structures in accordance with the Plan; and any change in the total nu mber of individual parcels in the Project Area. In order to provide an opportunity to owners and tenants to participate in the growth and development of the Project Area, the Agency shall promulgate rules for owner and tenant participation. If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sites or land uses, the Agency shall establish reasonable priorities and preferences a mong the owners and tenants. Some of the factors to be considered in establishing these priorities and preferences should include present occupancy, participant's length of • residency or occupancy in the area, acco m modation of as many participants as possible, similar land use to similar land use, conformity of participants' proposals with the intent and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, ability to finance the implementation, development experience and total effectiveness of participants' proposal in providing a service to the co m m unity. Owner participant priorities ,shall take effect at the time that the Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council In addition to opportunities for participation by individual persons and firms, participation to the extent it is feasible shall be available fior two or more persons, firms or institutions, to pin together in partnerships, corporations, or other pint entities. 2.2.2 Owner Participation Agree ments The Agency may require each participant to enter into a binding agree ment with the Agency by which the participant agrees to rehabilitate, develop, or use the property in conformance with the Plan and to be subject to the provisions in the Participation Agreement. In such agreements, participants who retain real property shall be required to pin in .the recordation of such documents as is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. Whether or not a .participant enters into a Participation Agreement with the Agency, the provisions of this Plan are applicable to all public and private property.in the Project Area. • 2.3 Rehabilitation, Conservation, and Moving of Structures (0130D) -5- Redevelopment Plan 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve or to cause to be • rehabilitated any building or structure in the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized and directed to advise, encourage and assist in the rehabilitation of property in the Project Area not owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency will conduct such a program to encourage owners of property within the Project Area to upgrade and maintain their property consistent with City codes and standards for the Project Area.' Properties may be rehabilitated provided: (1) rehabilitation and conservation activities on a structure are carried out in an expeditious manner and in conformance with this Plan and applicable City building codes and ordinances, and (2) where applicable, rehabilitation is completed pursuant to an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event an owner-participant fails or refuses to rehabilitate or develop his real property pursuant to this Plan and an Cwner-Participation Agree ment, the real property or any interest therein may be acquired by the Agency if acquisition funds are available. 2.3.2 Moving of Structures As is necessary in carrying out this Plan and where it is econo mically feasible to do so, the Agency is authorized in its discretion to move or.cause to be moved any standard structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a • location within or outside the Project Area and dispose of such structures.in conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2 A Acquisition of Property Except as specifically exe nLpted Herein, the Agency may acquire, but is riot required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase, e m inept do main, or any other lawful method. 2.4.1 Eminent Domain It is in the public interest and may be necessary in some instances, in order to eliminate the conditions requiring redevelopment and in order to execute the Plan, for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property in the Project Area. The Agency shall co ni mence eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the Project Area within twelve (12) years after the adoption of the Plan. 2.4.2 ProPerty..Owned By Public Bodies The Agency is not authorized by law to'acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. The Agency is authorized, however, to acquire 'private property which was formerly.public property by being transferred by deed, lease, or otherwise to private ownership or control before the Agency co ml2etes land disposition within the entire Project Area if the Agency and the private owner cb'not enter into a participation agree ment. (0130D) -6- Redevelopment Plan 2.4.3 Property Sub�ect to Owner Participation Agree menus • The Agency shall not acquire real property to be retained by an owner pursuant to a participation agreement if the owner fully performs under the agree ment. The Agency is authorized to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which those structures are located. The Agency is also authorized to acquire any other interest.in real property less than a fee. The Agency shall not acquire real property on which an existing building is to be continued on .i.ts present site and in its present form and use without the consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires substantial structural alteration, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation to assure that such building Co mplies with all applicable codes, or (2) the site or lot on which the building is situated required modification in size, shape or use, or (3) it is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Plan and the owner fails or refuses to participate in the Plan by executing a participation agreement:. The Agency shall define the circumstances to which this section is applicable. 2.4.4 Property Not Subject to Owner Participation Agreements The Agency may, in its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real property within the Project Area and the owners of such property will be permitted to remain as conforming owners without an owner participation agree ment with the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use and maintain real property within the requirements of the Plan. However, • conforming owners may be required by the Agency to enter into an Owner Parti.cipatioii Agreement with the Agency in the event that such owners desire to (1) construct any additional .imfrovements or substantially alter or modify existing structures or any of the real property described above as conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. 2.4.5 Personal Property Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary in the execution of the Plan, the Agency is authorized to acquire personal property in the Project Area by any lawful means, including a minent do main, within twelve years of the adoption of this Plan. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Non-Residential Occupants There are no residential uses within the Project Area. However, in the event public i mprove menus outside the Project Area are dee med necessary in order to acco mplish the goals of the Redevelopment Plan, and, as a result. of the improvements displacement of residential occupants and owners occur, the Agency shall assist all families, individuals, or other entities displaced by the project in finding other locations and facilities. in order to carry out the project with a mini mu m of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families in. finding housing that is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, in reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by acquisition, construction leasing, rehabilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing outside the Project Area for displaced persons, and to meet • housing replacement require m ents of state law. (0130D) -7- Redevelopment Plan The Agency shall make relocation payments to l.ersons (including families, business concerns, and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses and direct lasses of personal property (businesses only) for which reimbursement or compensation is not • otherwise made. In addition. the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred in the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rubs and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of Califomia. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate existing residential tenants- within a reasonable. distance. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improve menu and Site Preparation The Agency is authorized to de molisli and clear or move buildings, structures, and other i m prove menu fro m any real property in the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. The Agency is authorized to install and construct or cause to be installed and constructed temporary public improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public improvements may include but are not limited to traffic signals, streets, and utilities. Temporary utilities maybe installed above ground. The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or pay all or part of the value of, or to cause to be installed and constructed with the consent of the �City Council of the City of Huntington Beach the public improvements and public utilities (within or • outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the Plan and.tao pay 5or part or all of the value therefor, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public improvements are of benefit.to the Project Area or to the im mediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and (2) no other reasonable means of financing such public improvements are available to the Community. Such public improvements may include, but are not limited to, parking facilities, recreational improvements, landscaping, utility undergrounding, benches, bus stops, pedestrian walkways, over or under passes, bridges, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, storm drains, boxing of flood control channels, traffic signals, electrical distribution syste ms, water distribution syste ms, plazas, parks and playgrounds. Specifically,_ the Agency may pay for, install or construct, and may acquire or pay for the land required therefore, the facilities, buildings, and structures set forth in Exhibit "D", Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Agency is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property in the Project Area.owned by the Agency. • (0130 D) -f3- Fedevelop ment Plan When the cost of the installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other • improvement, has .been or will be.pai.d or provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other improvement, by periodic pay ments over a period of years. If•in implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and: families of low or moderate .income are destroyed or.re moved from the low and moderate income housing market as fart of the redevelopment ixoject, the Agency shall, within flour years of such destruction or re moval, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, in accordance with all of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for Uses in Accordance with this Plan Fbr the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, .lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. To the extent per mitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of real property by leases, trades or sales by negotiation without public bidding. • All real property acquired by the Agency in the Project shall be sold or leased to public or private IRrsons or entities for develop ment for the uses permitted in the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. Property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency shall .be ,offered for resale within one year after co mpletion of rehabilitation or an annual report concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that .developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. All purchasers or lessees.of property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the. property within a ti me which the Agency "fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency dee ms necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, Leased, or conveyed by the Agency, as well as all property subject to participation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agree ments, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. • (01.30 D) R e develop m ent Plan The leases, deeds, contracts, agree ments, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Phan. • All property in the Project Area .is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjpyment of property in the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a participation agreement shall be made expressly subject by appropriate decu ments to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, -or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain such nondiscri mination and nonsegregation clauses as are required by law. To the extent now or hereafter per mitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, .structure, or other improve ment either within or outside the Project Area for itself or for any public body or entity to the extent that such improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. . During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of,this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development in the Project Area is proceeding in accordance with c1sposition and development dxuments and time schedules. For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encu mber, or otherwise dispose of personal property. 3.0 REDEVELOPMLNT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION e 3.1 Cooperation with City Subject to any limitation in law, the City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take any further action necessary to. ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused. the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City shall include but are not necessarily li mited to the following: Institution and completion of proceedings. for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of--way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way in the Project Area. Such action by the City may include the abandonment and relocation of public utilities in the public rights-of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. Institution and cc mpletion of proceedings necessary for changes and improve ments in publicly-owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. (0130D) -10- Redevelopment Plan — Revision of zoning, if necessary, within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Plan. • — Imposition wherever necessary (by conditional use permits or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels in the Project Area to ensure their proper develop ment.and use. Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop and provide for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all real property, both public and -private, within the Project. Area throughout the duration of this Plan. Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will. permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be co m menced and carried to co mpletion without unnecessary delays. Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of all conceptual plans and substantial amendments to said plans pertaining to land use and development in the Project Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to application approval by the City. The City is authorized, but not obligated, to provide and expend funds to ensure the completion of the pro e jct as a whole in accordance with this.Plan. • 7lie obligation of the City to perform the actions indicated in this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described in Section 1.4 hereof, be contingent upon . the continued availability of funding for this project primarily from tax increment revenues as defined in Method for Financing herein. In the event that such funds, at any time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this project, the obligation of the City shall thereafter be limited to providing assistance . in the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead'costs in connection with the termination or completion of the project Such termination or completion shall be li mite d solely to those activities previously co m menced pursuant do this Plan. — The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project I • (0130D) -11= Re ment Plan 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without • consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and shall atte mpt to ccord.nate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The. Agency, by law, is not authorized to acquire real property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. The Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in the Plan.to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the require ments of this Plan. Any public body which owns or leases property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner and tenant participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the manage ment, . maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its dsposition for redevelop ment 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area Private Uses Permitter land uses within the Project Area are.those co m mercial and public • uses as shall be illustrated fro m time to ti me in the General Plan of the. City. Specific permitted uses within the Project Area are those that are permitted or conditionally permitted by the zoning ordinance contained in the Ordnance Code when the zoning ordinance conforms to the General Plan. Land uses for the Project Area are shown in ExIiibit "C." — Public Uses, Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way and Ease ments The public rights-of-way, principal streets and streets that may require i mprove ments as proposed for the Project Area are illustrated in Exhibit "A". Exhibit "D shows the proposed public i mprove ments. • (0130 D) -12- Re(-bvelop ment Plan Streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper circulation. Additional public streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency • and the City within or outside the Project Area as needed for proper development, circulation and access. The Beach Boulevard off ramp of the 405 Freeway may be modified and an off and on.ramp added at Gothard. The existing flood control channel within the Project Area may be boxed in in order to utilize the surface area. Crossings of the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way may be provided at one or more locations, as required for proper circulation. Se mi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses The Agency is authorized to permit the the establishment or enlargement of public, semi public, institutional, or nonprofit uses, including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, fraternal, employee .institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, if allowed by the Agency, shall eonfor m so far as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses in the specific area involved.. The Agency shall impose such other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject .to the controls and requirements of this Plan. Furthermore, the Agency may, if it deems appropriate • and/or necessary, specify requirements in excess of those described herein or specified by state and local laws. No real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of the Plan except with approval of the Agency and in con£or mane with the provisions of this Plan. 3.4.1 Construction All construction, whether new or rehabilitation, in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws in effect from time to time including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical., sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach, as they presently exist or may hereinafter be a mended. 3.4.2 Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses Existing structures within the Project Area may, with Agency approval, be repaired, altered reconstructed, or rehabilitated, if necessary, in such a manner that will meet the following requirements: — Be safe, sanitary, and sound in all physical respects; • (0130D) -13- Redevelopment Plan Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation require ments of the building code for the City of Huntington Beach. Shall conform to all codes for the City of Huntington Beach. • Shall be architecturally co mpatible with new development. 3.4.3 Retention of Existing Nonconforming Uses The Agency is authorized to Fer mit an existing use to remain in an existing building in decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform too. the provisions of this Plan, Izovided that such use is generally co mpatible with the developments and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be wilting to enter into a Participation Agreement and agree to the imposition of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary bo. protect the development and use of the Project Area. The Agency is also authorized to permit an existing use in an existing building not in decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provision of this Plan,. provided_ that such buildings are rehabilitated to a decent, safe and sanitary condition, as determined by the Agency, and provided that such a use is generally compatible with develop ment and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter into a Participation Agreement and agree to the imFosi.tion of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the :development and use of the Project Area. 3 A A Inco mpatible Uses • No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, s moke, glare, noise, odor, or similar factors would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. 3.4.5 Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, including. any parcels retained by a participant, shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. 3.4.6 Limitation of Building Lensity The number of buildings in the Project Area will be consistent with building intensities per mitted pursuant local zoning ordinances, as a mended fro m ti me to time, for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. 3.4.7 Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building, and other applicable codes and ordinances and this plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Phan, the Plan shall supersede. . • (0130 D) -14- Redevelop ment Plan All new buildings built within the Project Area shall complement the overall aesthetic appearance and design of the existing buildings within and adjacent • to the Project Area. 3.4.8 Open Space, Landscaping, and Parking The approximate amount of open space to be provided in the Project Area is the total of all area which will be in the public grounds, the space between buildings, landscaped areas and surface parking. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets, public and private parking and private streets shall be provided for in each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time and this Plan. In all areas sufficient space, including open spaces, shall be maintained between buildings and structures tD provide adequate light, air, and privacy. Exhibit "E" shows the approximate amount of open space in the Project Area. 3.4.9 Signs Signs_ which create hazards or unsightly appearances by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation, or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted in this Project Area. Zhe Agency shall per nAt only those signs necessary for identification of buildings, pre miles, uses and products associated with the hand parcel involved. All signs shall be • approved through a planned sign program. 3.4.10 Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, m arLtal status, national origin, or ancestry per mitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. 3.4.11 Minor Variations Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency is authorized to permit mirror variations fro m the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit such minor variations, the Agency must deter mine that . — The strict application of the provisions of the Plan would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent.'with the general purpose and intent of this Plan. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended development of the property which do not generally apply to other properties having the same standards, restrictions and controls Permitting a minor variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements within or • outside the Project Area. (0130D) -1.5- Redevelopment Plan — Per mitting a minor variation will not be contrary to the objectives of this Plan. Exceptions: No such minor variation shall be granted which changes a basic land use or • which permits substantial departure from the provisions of this Plan. In permitting any such minor variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and to assure compliance with the purposes of this Plan. Nondiscrimination and nonsegregation restrictions shall not be subject to minor variation. No minor variation permitted by the Agency shall be effective until conditional uses,. .variances, or other zoning changes, if any, have been effectuated by the City to the extent necessary to obtain consistency with such minor,variations per mitted by the Agency. 3A.12 Building. Permits, No permit shall be issued for any work pertaining' to the erection, construction, moving, conversion, alteration, or addition to any building, building, structure, or paving until application.for such permit has been made by the owner or his agent and processed in a manner consistent ,with all City require m ents. The Agency is authorized to establish procedures and approvals in addition to those set.forth above where required for the purposes of this Plan. Where such additional procedures and approvals are established, all Agency agreements or assistance for any redevelopment activity shall require compliance therewith. • 3.4.13 Design for Development Within the limits, restrictions, and controls established in this Plan, the Agency is authorized to establish design criteria, traffic circulation, traffic access, . and other development- and design controls necessary for proper development of both private and public areas within the Project Area. 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, if it dee ms appropriate, is authorized to finance this project with assistance fro m the City of Huntington Beach, Crange County, State of California, Federal Government of the. United States of America, any other public agency, donations, special assessment districts, property tax increments, interest revenue, income revenue, Agenc y-issue d notes and bonds, loans .from private institutions, the lease of Agency-owned property, the sale of Agency-owned property, or fro m any other sources of financing which are legally available and dD not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. The City may sulply advances and expend money as necessary to assist the Agency in carrying out this project- Such assistance shall be on ter ms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington beach Redevelopment Agency. • (0130D) -16- Redevelopment Plan 3.5.2 Tax Incre ments • Tax incre ment financing may riot be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project assessed valuation base will be established in accordance with .state Law as described herein. Any tax incre ments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the incre ment by itself or fro m the sale of tax allocation bonds allows. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Huntington Center Cc m mercial District Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the States of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows; That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property_ in the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation. of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid. For the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory is.annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of • Orange last equalized.on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used in deter mining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in . the project on said effective elate; That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such a mount shall be allocated to, and when collected shall be paid into, a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumes,, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in .whole or in part, this redevelopment project Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. when said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received fro m taxes upon the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. That portion of . taxes discussed in this Subsection are hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the advance of monies, or' making Loans, or the incurring of any indebterhess, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) .by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or in part the Huntington Center Com mercial District Redevelopment Project. (o130 D) 17- Redevelopment Plan The Agency is authorized to-incur indebtedness and to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and bonded indebtedness contained in this Subsection. • 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes The Agency may issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bond or rates shall be issued only after the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, available to repay-principal and interest• when due and payable. In any case, the issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bond are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for the m, nor in any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any hands or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bond do not constitute am indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 3.5.4 Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance fro m the United States, or any other public or private source will be utilized, if available, as the Agency dee ms appropriate to its corporate purposes. 3.5.5 . Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may,-but is not required to, in any fear during -which it owns property in a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public. corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exe mpt, an a mount of money in lieu of taxes. The Agency may, but is not required to, also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts. of money which in the Agency's determination is appropriate to. alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the-project. 3.5. 6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2, 33334.2 and 33334.2 of . the California. Co m m unity Redevelopment Law, the_following limitations are imposed on this Plan. Except by amendment of this plan, the portion of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section. 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cu mulative total of the su m of: a) 126,450,000 for all Agency redevelopment activities in the • i mple mentation and furtherance of this plan: (0130D) -1.8- Redevelopment Plan • b) Any a mounts paid by the Agency to any affected taxing agency pursuant to section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this Plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing by the projects and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Con,munity Redevelopment Law and . this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing . for persons and families of very low, low or moderate into me. — The time limit on the establishing of loans, advances and indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Redevelopment Project shall be twenty years fro m the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council Such loans, advances or indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time longer than twenty years. No loans, advances- or indebtedness to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the before mentioned Section 33670 shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond such time limitation unless such time limit is extended by a mendment of this Plan. — Except.by a mend ment of this Plan, the a mount of bonded indebtedness to be repaid .in whole or in part fro m the allocation of taxes to the Agency pursuant to Section 3.5.2 of this Plan shall not exceed a cumulative total of the sum of: • a) 384,500,000 for Agency redevelopment activities in the. implementation and furtherance of this plan: b) Any amounts paid by the Agency from the lxoceeds of such bonded indebtedness to any affected taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Co m munity Redevelop ment Law and Section 3.5.5 of this plan to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project and c) Any amounts deposited by the Agency from the proceeds of such bonded indebtedness in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the community Redevelopment Law and this Section 3.5.6 for purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of housing for persons and fa milies of very low, low or moderate inco me. Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate .income, as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low income households as .defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following .findings are made: • — That no need exists in the co m m unity to i mprove or increase the supply of housing for persons and fa mikes of low or moderate inco me or very low inco me households;or (0130D) -19- Redevelopment Plan i That some stated percentage less than 20 l.ercent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to • meet such housing need; or That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the co m munity is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the co.m munity from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing-alone or in combination with the taxes allocated, under this section; is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City . shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. • • (0130D) -20- Redevelopment Plan McFADDEN ■ � • ,rn�ox 'Qcp ■ ,�ii� P, Fr1F\i � �,. •♦�♦1♦ _ i I ��r: fir.• �� </� \ no ■ CENTER DRIVE _. _ ---- --1h. ■. ♦• ■ HUNTINGTON CENTER , C7 i-1 0 ■ O m co L w 1 - -- - 1J l-_ J L-J \_- -- -._. J J -� -- - - - ----._.___.� l.. .._..> .. ---_ __J U 't EDINGER AVE. OWN I ■ IF! so ■ �� r j r i� ; L-i \ 1 r-.,J 1, ��_7 ■ ■ ! I � ! ij ■ 1 I � [.� ■ l - Ij 1 i ! ilummunumosei ■( - ■ a r Scale 1" - 200 ' ; : ; •...r....-'.... . NUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA HUNTING�'ON_ CENTER PLANNING DIVISION COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PR6JECT AREA EXHIBIT A;- PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY, MAp • (013011)) -21- Redevelopment Plan • EXHIBIT B - LEGAL DESCRIPTION • (0130D) -22- Redevelopment Plan -� 13eginning -it the northwest corner of Parcel 2 as shown on a map recorded in book 107, page 18, Parcels Maps, Records of Orange County; thence north 4.70 28' 13" west 20.57 • feet along the northwesterly prolongation of the northerly line of said Parcel 2 to. the I rue Point of Ber)inninq; thence south 1.l0 59' 18" east 421.27 feet along the west line of the southwest quarter of the norl heasL quarter of Section 14, Township 5 south, flange I I west, as shown on said parcel reap to a point, said point being the center of Section 14, I ownship 5 south, Mange I I west as shown on a map recorded in Book 169, pages 45 and 40, Parcel Maps, Records of Orange County. Thence south 890 32' 08" west 301.00 feet; thence south 00 39' 35" east 545.82 feet to a tangent curve, said curve being concave northwesterly and having a radius of 500.00 teet; thence southerly and westerly along said curve through a central angle of 440 59' 42" an arc distance of 392.66 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence south 440 20' 07" east 94.24 feet along said tangent line to a tangent curve, said curve being concave southeasterly and having a radius of 5.00.00 feet; thence southerly and westerly through a central angle of 450 00' 00", an arc distance of 392.70 feet to a point, said point being the southeast corner of the west half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 14, Township 5 south, Range I I west pee P.ircel Map 81-571; thenca north 89° 32' 15" east 395.47 feet to a point, said point being the soutneast corner of said Parcel Map 81-571; thence south 00 39' 35" east 150.00 feet; thence north 890 P 55" east 109.00 feet; thence south 00 39' 35" east 1320.67 feet; t h nce north 890 32' 04" east 156.00 feet to a point, said point being the south quarter corner of :section 14, 1ownship 5 south, Range I I west as shown on a neap recorded in I�nnk 22, paye 18, Parcel Maps, Records of Orange County; thence south 00 44' 25" east 660.00 feet; thence north 890 24' 50" east 45.00 feet to a point, said point bung the northwest corner 'of .Tract 5894, as shown on a map recorded in Book 23, pages 18 and 19, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County; thence north 890 24' 50" east 1004.93 feet along the north line of said Tract 5894 and the easterly prolongation of said north line to a pornt,'said point being on the centerline of Sher Lane; thence north 00 44' 25" west 130.00 feet; thence north 890 24' 50" east 376.00 feet; thence south 00 44' 25" east 100.00 feet; thence north 890 24'. 50" east 528.96 feet; thence north 00 44' 25" west 180.00 feet to the centerline intersection of Parkside Lane ar„j Aldrich Avenue; thence mirth 890 16' 1 5" east 685.03 feet t(. a point rin the section line of Huntington Beac.. I Boulevard per Tract 417, ds shown on a snap r erorded in Book 16, page 4.7, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, thence north 00 16' 46" east 1275.36 feet; thence north 490 16' 37" Nest 900.00 feet; thence north 00 27' 57" west 125.00 feet; thence north 460 55' 24" west 572.85 feet; thence north 460 19' .52" west 501.21 feet; thence north 500 25' • 56" west 329.65 feet; thence north 540 14' 34" west 1196.05 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1 93y Excepting .herefrurn that portion described as follows: Beginning the center of Section 14, Township 5 south, flange I I west, as shown on a neap recorded in Book 169, pages 45 and 46, Parcel Maps, Records of Urange County; thence south 1)0 39' 35" east 1220.82 feet alone; the west line of the southeast quarter of Section. 14, Township 5 south, Range l I west., as shown on a parcel map, recorded in Book 81, pages 12 through 14, Parcel Maps, Records of Orange County to a point, said point being on the north right-of-way line of Center Drive; thence north 890 32' 03" east 650.41 feet along the south line of Parcel 3 of said Parcel Maps to a.point on a tangent curve, said curve being concave to the northwest a.id having a radius of 34.00 feet, a radial bearing through said point bears north 370 53' 39" west; thence northerly and easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 520 45' 42", an arc distance of 31.31 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 00 39' 21" west 22.68 feet along said tangent line to a point on a tangent curve, said curve being concave to the southeast and having a radius 'J 41.6.00 feet; thence northerly and easterly along said curve through a central angle of 27r' 23' 14", an arc distance.of 193.59 feet to a point of reverse curvature, a radial gearing thi 3ugh said point bears north 630 16' 07" west; said curve being concave to the • timthwest and having a radius of 345.00 feet; thence northerly and westerly along said tirve Lhr(it,yh.a cer,Lral angle of 34" 21' 52", an arc distance of 206.92 feet to a point on a tanyent i-..irve, a radial gearing through said point bears north 82° 22' 01" east; said curve he►r,g concave to the southwest and having a radius of 345.00 feet; thence northerly and westerly tifrou-jh a r_entral angle 10. 27' Ol", an arc distance of 62.93 feet to a point on a Tangent lire; thence north 180 05' 00" west 241.00 feet to a point on a tangent_ curve; said curve beir,y concave to the southwest and having a radius of 270.00 feet; thence northerly and westerly along said curve through a central angle of 720 34' 35", an arc distance of 342.00 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence south 890 20' 25" west 160.28 feet alonq said tangent line to a point on a tangent curve, said curve being concave to the northeast and having a radius of 1 15.00 feet; thence westerly and northerly along said curve through a central angle of 900 O0' 00", an are distance of 274.89 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 00 39' 3'f" west 64.64 feet alone; said tangent lire to a point on a tangent curve, said curve being r oncave to the southwest and havin'. a radius of 34.00 feet: thence northerly and westerly along said.curve through a rental angle of 49. 09' 22", an are distance of 29.17 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve, a radial bearing through said point bears.north 400 11' 03" east, said curve being concave o the south and having a radius of ',60.00 feet; thence westerly along said curve through a :ventral angle of 00 24' • 45", an arc distance of 4.03 feet to a point art a non-tangent curve, a radial bearing through sijid _)uint bears north 41" 18' 14" east, said curve being concave southwest and having a radius 35.00 feet; thence .,ortherly and westerly through a central angle of 650 • 01' 29", an arc distance of 39.72 feet to a point on a non-tangent line, a radial bearing through said point bears north 170 23' 15" west; thence north 00 39' 35" west 30.12 feet; ° thence south 89 32' 00" west 15.010 feet to the point of beginning. • • EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN LAND USES OF PROJECT AREA • (0130D) -23- Redevelopment Plan ■ MCFADDEN ■.R.r.a.■ , NCO �. ■ ��ii7Giiiiia�. , f• , r so ♦ ■ Illy �� !• .. QUA B L I CO. ■ ' 40i -- ---- / . # •3• ♦♦l NSTITUTIO AL. ' • ■� MIXED USES iC CENTER DRIVE - - -- ---- �~ ■•■.■■■♦ \. rrr. t . \ j ♦i cn I I■ p j m HUNTINGTON CENTER � o GENERAL COMMERCIAL J ;� r I 1 m U. NGER AVE. ■r f ■ ■ I I ! it I ■ ■ � i • ' ' 1 , ,■ _ -_- ;------1 i ■ ■ ;---- �.. ._ __ -I fir..■....■■� I� , �f ■ i , scd E'_ l - 20lI ■ ■ ■ ■ i HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA GENERAL PLAP • PLANNING olvlsloN LAND USES OF PROJECT AREA EXHIBIT D • Huntington Center. Commercial District Redevelopment Project PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Regional Traffic Circulation Improvements 1 . Realignment of Gothard Street north . to Bolsa Avenue to link to Hoover Street at Bolsa Avenue , <and the construction of an on and off ramp on the I-405 Freeway at Gothard. 2 . Improvements to Center Avenue and I-405 Freeway ramps, including additional lane construction, signalization improvements , and provision of direct access to Huntington Center . 3 . Modifications to Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street to improve traffic flow, including si.gnalization improvements, ingress/egress closures, median left-turn closures , and other associated activities . 4 . Modifications to Center Drive to facilitate vehicular movements into and between One Pacific Plaza and Huntington • Center . Utilities Undergroundiing/Relocation Undergrounding, modification or relocation of existing Southern California Edison high voltage - transmission lines north of Huntington Center and south of Center Drive and the undergrounding of other overhead lines within the Project Area. Publicly Owned Parking Facility Construction of publicly owned parking facility of approximately 2,000 spaces to serve an expanded Huntington Center . On-Site Improvements 1 . Construction of an internal circulation system between Huntington Center and the adjacent commercial development between Center and Gothard Streets . 2 . On site circulation and parking improvements on the strip commercial area south of Edinger Avenue . 3. Provision of parking within the Edison right-of-way. • (1196d) • EXHIBIT E - DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF OPEN'SPACE • w (0130D) -25- Redevelopment Plan i DIA(a[ ,AM ILLUSTRATING APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE. +++ + +++++ + }+++++ +-1-++-1 4 +'+ ++i + +++++++ i'+++++-++++++ +-++++++++++ ++++ +-f' 1 1" 1 1 f" + 4 1 '. 1 } ++ + f-+ + i- 1" f a ! } I' 1 + 1" + +i 4-"1 1 1 1 , + 1- 4 1 f 1 1 i 1 1 + 1 i-+++ ++ 1 + ++ + i 1 1 -++++++ + f + ++ i "i f +++++++++ +++ +4 ++4 4 ++ ++-f ++ + ++ f i-+++++++++++++ +++++BUILDING AREA 50 - 55 0 +++ ++ + includin ar_kin structures:++++ g. P, q. . ++++ +, +++++++++++++++++ ; -r+++++++++++++++ ++++ +++ 1-+++++"+-+ i-+++++++++++++++-.4- ++ +++4-++++ +++++++++++ +++++++++' ++ +++ ++++++ i-++++++++ ++++++++++++++++ - + i +++ h++++-F++ OPE'i SPACE 45 - 50% including ,urface parkin. E - i i NOTES: 1 . Perc:ur.ta:4es ire approximate. i 1 . "OP,-'k SVACE" 1, ,ns areas gen(:;:a 1-ly maintained as Landscape. or other spaces bottieen buildings. 1 3 . "BUILDIN'3 Akl,A" means Land area devoted to buildings. mum HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA Of PLANNING DIVISION