HomeMy WebLinkAboutMid Term Review - 2009 - 2014 Five-Year Implementation Plan Council/Agency Meeting Held:
Deferred/Continued to:
IQApp ved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied ''d. ity CI 's Si ature
17
Council Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Departmen ID Number: ED 11-52
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Chairman and Agency Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, Executive Director
PREPARED BY: Bob Hall, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: Conduct Public Hearing on the Mid-term Review of the Five-Year
Implementation Plan (2009-2014) for the Huntington Beach Merged
Redevelopment Project
Statement of Issue: California Redevelopment Law [California Health and Safety Code
§33490(c)] requires the Redevelopment Agency hold a public hearing to evaluate the
progress of its Five-Year Implementation Plan (2009-2014) for the Huntington Beach Merged
Redevelopment Project.
Financial Impact: None required.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
A) Conduct the public hearing; and,
B) Approve the Mid-term Review - Five-Year Implementation Plan (2009-2014) for the
Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project.
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve and provide direction to staff.
Item 28. - I xB -828-
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/19/2011 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 11-52
Analysis: On December 21, 2009, the Redevelopment Agency adopted its Five-Year
Implementation Plan for the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project, covering the
years from 2009-2014. The purpose of the Five-Year Implementation Plan is to identify the
specific goals and objectives for the Project Area, describe programs, including potential
projects and estimated expenditures that would be made during the five years, and explain
how these activities will eliminate blight and improve and increase the supply of affordable
housing. California Redevelopment Law §33490(c) requires that the Redevelopment Agency
hold a public hearing to evaluate the progress of its Five-Year Implementation Plan, at the
mid-term.
The "Mid-term Review" — Five-Year Implementation Plan (2009-2014) Huntington Beach
Merged Redevelopment Project" (Attachment 1) provides a summary of the goals of the plan,
the status of the progress made since December 2009, and the remaining activities
anticipated to fulfill the goals and objectives of the Plan. The Housing Strategy is a separate
document and will be reviewed in 2012.
Plan Goals: The Agency has developed twelve (12) goals to address the blighting conditions
within the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project. During this Implementation Plan
period, the Agency has been extremely active in remedying these conditions via projects such
as the adoption of the updated Downtown Specific Plan and the Beach and Edinger Corridor
Specific Plan, redevelopment of the former Montgomery Wards site (Bella Terra - Phase II),
the former Levitz Furniture Site, and Edinger Plaza. The following are some of the major goals
of the Five-Year Implementation Plan since its adoption in December 2009. (For a complete
list see the attached Plan.) These goals are consistent with the City Council's Strategic
Planning Goal for 2009-2012: Enhance Economic Development.
Goal: Eliminate and Prevent the Spread of Conditions.of Blight
The Agency completed the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan in March 2010 and
an update to the Downtown Specific Plan in October 2011. As a result of the
approved Specific Plans, several projects have begun or are scheduled to begin in
the near future due to the favorable environment for development intended to
eliminate or prevent further blight within and/or adjacent to the Project Area. These
projects include Bella Terra Phase II, Edinger Plaza (Watt Commercial), The
Boardwalk (former Levitz site), Decron (Beach and Warner), the Edinger Hotel site,
Beach/Atlanta Center, and Pacific City.
Goal: Expand the Commercial Base of the Project Area
In addition to the above-mentioned projects, in the Downtown area, the Agency
continues to work toward the ultimate completion of the Waterfront Project, with an
expanded Hilton Hotel anticipated to comprise 250 rooms with a spa, fitness facility
and lounge/bar for guests.
The Agency is working with Crescent Heights, the new owners of the 31-acre parcel
entitled for the construction of Pacific City, which will include retail, hotel,
entertainment, office, restaurants, public areas and residential at both market and
affordable levels.
xB -829- Item 28. - 2
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/19/2011 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 11-52
The City abandoned the frontage road bordering the shopping center at Beach/Atlanta
in an effort to maximize development opportunities. The property owner has
commenced an exterior rehabilitation and is transforming an underperforming center
on a major commercial thoroughfare by making it more visually appealing and
attracting quality retail and restaurant tenants to expand the commercial base of the
project area.
Goal: Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure
Construction of concrete alleys within the Main-Pier Subarea, as well as concrete,
asphalt and other public improvements in the Oakview neighborhood have been
completed with further improvements planned.
Construction of a $2.5 million parallel storm drain at the intersection of Slater and
Parkside was funded by the Agency. The project addresses capacity issues within
the existing drainage system that serves the Oakview Subarea.
The seismic retrofit of City Hall was completed, along with ADA upgrades to the
Huntington Beach Art Center and Fire Stations.
Goal: Promote Local Job Opportunities
Completion of The Strand project has resulted in a minimum of 100 new job
opportunities within the Project Area. In addition, the projects occurring as a result of
the completed Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan will result in a minimum of 350
jobs, with the first 200 in the new Costco Warehouse, as part of the Bella Terra II
project.
Goal: Encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, businesses,
businesspersons, public agencies, and community organizations in the
redevelopment/revitalization of the Project Area.
Several recommendations made by the Downtown Image Ad Hoc Committee have
been implemented. Each of these actions came as a result of the participation of the
community in cooperation with the City to make the downtown area a better place in
which to live, work and visit.
Public Notice: A notice of this hearing was published according to Government Code §6063
and posted in four prominent locations within the project area for a period of three weeks. It
was also published in the Huntington Beach Independent on November 24, December 1 and
December 8, 2011, completing the publication period of ten days prior to this hearing as
required by law.
Environmental Status: Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance Economic Development.
Item 28. - 3 HB -830-
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/19/2011 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 11-52
Attachment(s):
e -
1. Mid-term Review of the Five Year Implementation Plan (2009/10 — 2013/14) Huntington
Beach Merged Redevelopment Project
2. PowerPoint Presentation
HB -831- Item 28. - 4
ATTACHMENT #1
„emzH . , Hd -832-
Midterm Review of the
Five Year Implementation Plan (2009/10-2013/14)
Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project
Merged Project Area (comprises the following Projects)
® Yorktown-Lake
• Talbert-Beach
® Original Main Pier
• Oakview
® Added Main-Pier
• Huntington Center
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA
December 19, 2011
p
- 1
xB -833- Item 28. - 6
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Redevelopment Agency Board
Chair
DON HANSEN
Vice-Chair
DEVIN DWYER
Members
CONNIE BOARDMAN
KEITH BOHR
JOE CARCHIO
MATTHEW HARPER
JOE SHAW
FRED WILSON
Executive Director
BOB HALL
Deputy Executive Director/
Economic Development Director
Staff
KELLEE FRITZAL
Deputy Director of Economic Development
SIMONE SLIFMAN
Economic Development Project Manager
Item 28. - 7 HB -834-
Merges) Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 3
INTRODUCTION
This document is the Midterm Review of the Five Year Implementation Plan ("Midterm Review")
for the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project ("Project Area") of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach ("Agency.") The Implementation Plan covers the period
of fiscal years 2009/10 to 2013/14. The Midterm Review evaluates the Agency's previously-stated
goals and objectives, anticipated projects, programs and estimated expenditures for the five-year
planning period ending in 2013/14.
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach ("City") created its Redevelopment Agency on
March 1, 1976. Between 1982 and 1984, the Agency adopted five separate redevelopment
areas: Main-Pier, Talbert-Beach, Yorktown-Lake, Oakview, and Huntington Center. In December
1996, the five previously-identified redevelopment project areas were merged to form a single
project area entitled the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project Area, also more
commonly known as the "Merged Project Area," consisting of 619 acres.
Maps depicting the boundaries of the constituent areas of the Merged Project Area are presented
in Exhibits A-E.
Implementation Plan Amendment and Midterm Review
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33490 (c), at least once within the five-year term of
the Implementation Plan, the Agency must conduct a public hearing and allow testimony from all
interested parties. This hearing must take place no earlier than two years and no later than three
years after the adoption of the Implementation Plan. The Midterm Review conducted by the
Agency is two years from adoption of the Implementation Plan. Notice was published in the
Huntington Beach Indpendent for three consecutive Thursdays at least 31 days prior to the
hearing. Notices were also posted in four (4) separate and conspicuous locations in the Merged
Project Area for three weeks.
Project Area Time Limits
Pursuant to California Redevelopment Law, redevelopment areas are subject to various time
limits. The table below summaries the Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project time
limits pertaining to plan effectiveness, eminent domain authority, incurring debt, and repaying
debt.
Effective Tirrie Limit for
RedevelopmentDomain TimeLimitto TkMe Limitto Repay
'SubareaAdoption Date Plan Authority Incur Debt Ihde4tedness
Yorktown Lake 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 No Authority Rescinded 9/1/2035
Talbert-Beach 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 No Authority Rescinded 9/1/2035
Original Main Pier 9/20/1982 9/20/2025 7/15/2014 Rescinded 9/1/2035
Oakview 11/1/1982 11/1/2025 No Authority Rescinded 11/1/2035
Added Main-Pier 9/6/1983 9/6/2026 7/15/2014 Rescinded 9/6/2036
Huntington Center 1 11/26/1984 11/26/2027 1 7/15/2014 1 Rescinded 11/262037
Oakview Subarea excludes eminent domain on certain properties(Exhibit D-Redevelopment Plan).
Original Main Pier and Added Main Pier Subareas excludes eminent domain on property on which any persons legally reside.
HB -835- Item 28. - 8
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 4
Affordable Housing Requirements Not Included in this Implementation Plan
The documentation of affordable housing requirements within the Project Area is being prepared
and approved by the Agency under a separate document, which will be incorporated into this
Implementation Plan via reference. The "Affordable Housing Strategy" for the Project Area
satisfies the requirements of Sections 33334.2, 33334.4, 33334.6, 33413(a), and 33413(b) of the
Health and Safety Code. The Affordable Housing Strategy summarizes the Agency's housing
obligations pursuant to the legal requirements of AB 1290, AB 315, AB 437, AB 637, and SIB 701
for the 2009/10 - 2013/14 planning period.
Implementation Plan is Not a "Project" Under CEQA
Pursuant to Section 33490 (a)(1)(B) of the Health and Safety Code, the Implementation Plan does
not constitute a project within the meaning of Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code (the
California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA]). This Implementation Plan does not constitute an
approval of any specific program, project, or expenditure nor does it eliminate the requirement for
CEQA review (to the extent that it is required) at the time of approval of the program, project, or
expenditure.
Item 28. - 9 HB -836-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 5
Exhibit A
IC
aa .
El
�.> :. yNnAve
t
771
NOW
Q
77 T; EEII
v
.91i kApt� 3 a <W gg'
!'
FUIP
LLL
FTTT
Huntington Beach N � A
Redevelopment Prca'e+ct W E
orl town-L e Subarea
o 4M .. �- .
City, of Huntington beach
xB -837- Item 28. - 10
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Pa-ge 6
Exhibit B
_JIF,
<
f
AN
... .....
.. ............
s
t ter
r R i
y +t
..
4
l J
Wo
Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Project W E
Talbert-Beach Subarea s
City v Huntington Beach
Item 28. - 11 HB -838-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 7 .
Exhibit C
r. W5f
n
,e
i -
" r
a �
K
V
X a 43 '° \ a
& am ?
r� F s g � r ,
�. 3€ fi
'�.
g
.. .>
Huntington Beach N
Redevelopment Project E
Mam-Fier Subarea
City, of Huntington Beach Mies
xB -839- Item 28. - 12
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 8
Exhibit D
nr
_
MR
zoc
FA
IM
Wr
_ ?
s
gy y
v
R
�sy
_a F
�a
a r
w
Huntinaton Beau
Redevelopment Project W E
Oak View Subarea �
C74, of Huntington Beach
Item 28. - 13 xB -840-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 9
Exhibit E
r hax.al
4As4dOn Gore_
r
'R - P ii
1?1u�
g
'` ,k
IN 7-T
Nk
x T
,• Rs £ lam'
i
Redevelopment Pre'ect W g
mix
Huntinaton. Center Subarea
to of'Huntington Beach ��-----
HB -841- Item 28. - 14
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 10
MERGED PROJECT AREA BACKGROUND
• In 1982 the Agency adopted four (4) separate redevelopment areas: Main-Pier, Talbert-
Beach, Yorktown-Lake, and Oakview. The primary purpose of the redevelopment plans for
these areas was to eliminate blight by encouraging revitalization activities within the project
areas.
• In 1983 the redevelopment plan for the Main Pier Project was amended to expand the
Main-Pier Project Area boundaries.
• In 1984 the Agency adopted the Huntington Center Redevelopment Area (Bella Terra
Area).
• In December 1996, the Agency merged the five (5) previously-identified redevelopment
project areas to form a single project area entitled the Huntington Beach Merged
Redevelopment Project Area, which consists of 619 acres.
Subarea project summaries are provided below:
1. The 25-acre Talbert-Beach Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982, by Ordinance
No. 2577. At its adoption, this Subarea consisted of many encyclopedia lots, small
undevelopable parcels under multiple ownerships. The area is now characterized by a
balance of commercial, industrial and residential development.
2. The 30-acre Yorktown-Lake Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982, by Ordinance
No. 2576. This Subarea consists primarily of single family homes, an apartment
complex for seniors and the City Hall.
3. The original 5-block Main-Pier Subarea was adopted on September 20, 1982 by
Ordinance 2578. On September 6, 1983, the Redevelopment Plan was amended by
Ordinance No. 2634, enlarging the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area to
approximately 336 acres. The Subarea is located along a portion the City's beach and
encompasses the downtown. It is characterized by a mix of residential, retail, office,
hotel and public (i.e. Huntington Beach Pier, City Beach, Public Library, etc.) uses.
4. The 68-acre Oakview Subarea was adopted on November 1, 1982, by Ordinance No.
2582. This Subarea is predominantly developed with older multifamily housing occupied
by lower income families of diverse ethnicity. Many properties are not up to building
codes.
5. The 160-acre Huntington Center Subarea was adopted on November 26, 1984, by
Ordinance No. 2743. It is comprised exclusively of commercial uses and contains the
former Huntington Center Mall, which has been redeveloped into Bella Terra Mall, a
regional lifestyle retail and entertainment center. An OCTA Transit Center is also located
within this Project Area.
Item 28. - 15 HB -842-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementatlion Plan Pave 11
SPECIFIC PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS DESIGNED TO ELIMINATE BLIGHT
Since the inception of the Project Subareas, the Agency has aggressively sought to eliminate
blight within the Project Area through the implementation of various projects and programs.
The Implementation plan was created to eliminate physical and economic blight, expand the
commercial base and job opportunities, improve infrastructure and improve the supply of
housing. The Project Area's Redevelopment Plan identified 12 goals that would remediate
blight in the Project Area once accomplished. The Agency has been active in remedying
blighting conditions within the project area during the first two years of the Five Year
Implementation Plan, as indicated in the detail provided for each of the Plan Goals.
GOAL 1: Eliminate and Prevent the Spread of Conditions of Blight
The Agency completed the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan in March 2010
and an update to the Downtown Specific Plan in October 2011. As a result,
several projects have begun or are scheduled to begin in the near future due to
the favorable environment for development intended to eliminate or prevent
further blight within and/or adjacent to the Project Area. These projects include
Bella Terra Phase II, Edinger Plaza (Watt Commercial), The Boardwalk (former
Levitz site), Decron (Beach and Warner), the Edinger Hotel site, Beach/Atlanta
Center, and Pacific City, all more fully described under Goal 2 of this report.
o The California Legislature's approval of AB 1x26 and AB 1x27 in June 2011 and
the Supreme Court-issued Stay brought to a standstill the Agency's efforts to
expand the Project Area. At the time of this report, a decision is pending in the
California Supreme Court as to the constitutionality of those actions, but until
such a decision is made, California law prohibits an expansion that would further
the Agency's efforts to expand the area as planned and had been in progress to
include blighted commercial shopping centers to the Project Area.
GOAL 2: Expand the Commercial Base of the Project Area
• The Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan and the update of the Downtown
Specific Plan have been completed. The Beach/Edinger Plan has spurred
development beyond the expectations of the City and the Agency, with the start of
Bella Terra Phase II and Edinger Plaza, and the upcoming projects at The
Boardwalk, Beach and Warner and Beach and Ellis, all of which will add increased
square footage offering retail and commercial opportunities that will expand the
commercial base of the project area.
The Strand, a 3.97 acre site is situated along Pacific Coast Highway between 5th
and 6th Streets, has been fully completed. It features a 157-room boutique hotel,
The Shorebreak; 102,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and entertainment;
32,000 square feet of office space, currently occupied by Innocean Worldwide,
an international advertising agency, which relocated to Huntington Beach
specifically to occupy the prime office space at The Strand; and a 400-space
subterranean, public parking garage offering both self-parking and valet service.
HB -843- Item 28. - 16
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 12
The 12.5 acre site of the former Levitz Furniture Store will be developed by
Sares-Regis Group as The Boardwalk. The project will be mixed use, containing
487 multi-family housing units, with a 9,000 square foot resident recreation area;
12,000 square feet of commercial space; a half-acre of public open space; .
• Watt Companies has begun the transformation of Edinger Plaza, including the
addition of additional square footage for an existing retailer, and the addition of
two new, major anchor sporting goods and apparel retailers, along with upgrades
to the entire exterior, parking, signage and landscape. The project is estimated
to be complete by the third quarter of 2012.
Decron has proposed a Mixed Use Project located at the southwest corner of
Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue, which will include 279 residential units
developed throughout the project site. Development also includes 31,200 square
feet of additional retail space and 6,000 square feet of restaurant space on 9.4
acres. Some of the existing buildings will be demolished to accommodate the
project. The project includes the construction of two new retail buildings at the
corner of Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard, new mixed-use buildings along
both Warner and Beach and two new parking structures.
• Construction of Bella Terra Phase II has begun. This project includes the
redevelopment of the abandoned Montgomery Wards and Mervyn's buildings and
the development of a mixed use project including 156,000 square feet of retail
(Costco Warehouse), commercial and 467 market rate and affordable housing
units. The Project will improve pedestrian access to Bella Terra through improved
public infrastructure in the western and northern portions of the Bella Terra site;
create many job opportunities during construction and operation of the
development; and increase sales tax and property tax revenue to the City and
Agency.
• The Agency continues to work toward the ultimate completion of the Waterfront
Project, with the development of the final Parcel C, currently a parking lot. A 5tn
Implementation Agreement was approved on May 16, 2011 that will add an
expansion to the current Hilton Hotel, anticipated to comprise 250 rooms with a
spa, fitness facility and lounge/bar for guests. An environmental assessment is
underway and an entitlement review will occur in 2012, along with the securing of
project financing.
• The Agency is working with Crescent Heights, the new owners of the 31-acre
parcel entitled for the construction of Pacific City, which will include retail, hotel,
entertainment, office, restaurants, public areas and residential at both market and
affordable levels.
• The City abandoned the frontage road bordering the shopping center at
Beach/Atlanta in an effort to maximize development opportunities. The property
owner has commenced an exterior rehabilitation and is transforming an
Item 28. - 17 xB -844-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 13
underperforming center on a major commercial thoroughfare by making it more
visually appealing and attracting quality retail and restaurant tenants to expand the
commercial base of the project area.
• The Agency completed the acquisition of the 18,000 square foot site located at
7872 Edinger to combine with the adjacent owned properties and prepared a
Request for Proposals for the development of a hotel at the southeast corner of
Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane with the hope of achieving a high-quality,
nationally-branded hotel consisting of 120-150 rooms with amenities that would
make the hotel an attractive lodging option.
The Agency will continue to engage with the existing business community to
provide resources to allow them to expand and/or upgrade their business. The
Agency strongly believes in supporting the existing commercial, service and retail
businesses as part of the unique retail environment that is not only attractive to
residents and visitors to the City.
GOAL 3: Improve Public Facilities and Public Infrastructure
• The Agency finalized the seismic retrofit and refurbishing of City Hall, including the
provision of more efficient light and improvements to heating, ventilation and air
conditioning systems.
• Construction of a $2.5 million parallel storm drain at the intersection of Slater and
Parkside was funded by the Agency. The project addresses capacity issues
within the existing drainage system that serves the Oakview Subarea.
• Monitoring and review is ongoing with regard to parking in the downtown area as
facilitated by the completion of the Downtown Parking Master Plan. The Strand
Parking Garage has been completed, adding an additional 400 spaces in the
downtown.
• Construction of concrete, asphalt and other public improvements in the Oakview
neighborhood has been completed with further improvements planned.
• Construction of concrete alleys in the Main-Pier Subarea within the downtown has
been completed.
• Building improvements to meet ADA standards were completed at the Huntington
Beach Art Center and fire stations.
• Elevator upgrades and the installation of security cameras in the Main-Promenade
Parking Structure were completed.
• Progress is ongoing in the undergrounding of utilities along Pacific Coast Highway
in conjunction with Southern California Edison (SCE), CalTrans, and California
State Beaches Department.
HB -845- Item 28. - 18
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 14
GOAL 4: Improve inadequate drainage infrastructure.
• Construction of a $2.5 million parallel storm drain at the intersection of Slater and
parkside was funded and completed by the Agency. The project addresses
capacity issues within the existing drainage system that serves the Oakview
Subarea.
GOAL 5: Improve and/or provide electric, gas, telephone and wastewater
infrastructure to both developed and undeveloped properties within the
Project Area.
• The undergrounding of utilities along Pacific Coast Highway in conjunction with
Southern California Edison, CalTrans and the California State Beaches
Department is ongoing. Agency staff is actively involved in the monitoring of this
project and informing developers within the Main-Pier Subarea of positive
upgrades to utilities for the area.
• The completion of the parallel storm drain at the intersection of Slater and Parkside
has improved service to the residents and businesses of the Oakview Subarea.
• The approval of the Beach/Edinger Corridor Study and Downtown Specific Plan
define requirements for the improvement of infrastructure within the Project Area,
ensuring that new development projects provide improved infrastructure to the
Project Area wherever necessary.
GOAL 6: Promote local job opportunities.
• Completion of The Strand project has resulted in a minimum of 100 new job
opportunities within the Project Area. In addition, the projects occurring as a result
of the completed Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan will result in a minimum of
350 jobs, with the first 200 in the new Costco Warehouse, as part of the Bella
Terra II project.
GOAL 7: Encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, businesses,
businesspersons, public agencies, and community organizations in the
redevelopment/revitalization of the Project Area.
• Implementation of the recommendations made by the community members of the
Downtown Image Ad Hoc Committee began in 2010. Those implemented include:
increased fines for entertainment permit violations; new, more resident-friendly
conditions placed on the issuance of new entertainment permits and those
proposing to serve alcohol; increased police presence in the downtown core;
reduced bar operating hours; and approval of residential preferential parking
zones. Each of these actions came as a result of the participation of the
community in cooperation with the City to make the downtown area a better place
in which to live, work and visit.
Item 28. - 19 HB -846-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 15
• Study findings on both the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan and Downtown
Specific Plan were presented at public meetings prior to being approved by the
City Council. The Downtown Specific Plan was also presented to the California
Coastal Commission at public meetings. Many residents and business owners
from the downtown came to the meeting to indicate to their opinions on the plan to
the Commission.
• The Agency sponsors and plans the annual Economic Development Conference
which represents an opportunity to share current news on the programs and
developments occurring throughout the project area, as well as those planned for
the future.
• The Agency facilitated the approval and opening of the first Farmers Market in the
Oakview Area in 2011. The weekly Oakview Mercado sells fresh produce and also
provides free health education as well as dental and medical screenings to the
public.
• Two new programs encouraging transportation to the downtown were offered
during summer months beginning in summer 2010 and continued into 2011. The
Surf City Downtown Shuttle provided free rides on weekends and holidays from the
free parking lot at City Hall into the downtown, and the Surf City Bike Valet
program served patrons on Tuesday evenings and weekends, offering a free
alternative for bicycle parking.
• Surf City Nights, the Tuesday evening downtown street fair, continues to draw
thousands to Main Street each week. During the summer months in 2010 and
2011, bike valet service was implemented during summer months to encourage
alternative transportation to the downtown during peak times. The Surf City
Downtown Shuttle began Tuesday evening service in Summer 2011 as well.
• Efforts to further study and expand the Project Area to include commercial parcels,
including shopping centers and strip malls throughout the city to address physical
and economic blighting conditions, has been discontinued pending the opinion of
the California Supreme Court on the constitutionality of AB 1x26 and AB 1x27.
The signing of these bills into law effectually dismantled the prior structure of
local control of Project Areas and placed the Agency into a "pay or play" position,
requiring an initial payment of nearly $7 million from the Agency's tax increment
to the State of California in order to remain a legal Agency, and limiting any action
to expand the Project Area. The efforts to complete the Plan Amendment would
have included substantial public outreach activities.
GOAL 8: Implement design and use standards to assure high aesthetic and
environmental quality, and provide unity and integrity to developments
within the Project Area.
• Both the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan, and the Downtown Specific Plan,
adopted in 2010 and 2011, respectively, went through a rigorous community
xB -847- Item 28. - 20
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan - Midterm Review
2009/10 - 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 16
planning process and resulted in outstanding design and use standards which will
meet and/or exceed this goal with future developments. The Strand is
representative of the types of projects that meet this goal, as are the projects
currently underway within, or adjacent to, the Project Area.
GOAL 9: Address parcels of property that are of irregular form and shape, are
inadequately sized for property usefulness and development, and/or are held
in multiple ownership.
• The adoption of the Beach/Edinger Plan and the Downtown Specific Plan have
accounted for changes in zoning and the use of irregular parcels to further
eliminate the spread of blight within the Project Area.
• The Agency continues to assist nonprofit and for-profit entities to acquire parcels of
irregular shape and size whose usefulness is not being realized primarily in the
Oakview Area.
® The purchase of the parcel at 7872 Edinger Boulevard, on which currently sits a
Big-0 Tire store, has created a larger, contiguous lot that can now be developed,
as opposed to the prior conditions of irregularity that occurred due to both form and
multiple ownerships.
• The discontinuation of the Redevelopment Project Area Plan Amendment has
limited the Agency's further attempts to encourage consolidation of inadequately
sized properties and those held in multiple ownership using Redevelopment
Agency resources.
GOAL 10: Remove impediments to land disposition and development through the
assembly of property into reasonably-sized and shaped parcels served by
improved infrastructure and public facilities.
• Although the Agency was able to complete the acquisition of the Edinger parcel
prior to the approval of AB1x 26 and AB 1x 27, current California law
prohibits the Agency from entering into agreements to acquire property that
would help to achieve this goal until such time as the California Supreme Court
issues its ruling.
GOAL 11: Recycle and/or develop underutilized parcels to accommodate higher and
better economic uses while enhancing the City's financial resources.
• The formerly vacant and underutilized parcels along Edinger Avenue are producing
projects that will expand the commercial base of the area to provide for better and
more modern uses, which will ultimately produce additional sales taxes. and tax
increment to be invested within the Project Area.
• The Redevelopment Project Area Amendment, which has been discontinued as
further decribed in previously-identified goals, was to include underutilized parcels
Item 28. - 21 xB -848-
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 17
along Beach Boulevard and along other thoroughfares throughout the City.
Approval of the Plan Amendment would have resulted in opportunities to achieve
higher and better uses in many shopping centers, which would have assisted in
expanding the City's and the Agency's financial resources.
GOAL 12: Develop housing opportunities for all income levels.
• Development of housing opportunities is discussed in the Housing Strategy 2010-
2014 adopted on December 21, 2009, for which a mid-term report will be provided
in Fall 2012.
AGENCY FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT
The Agency presented in the Implementation Plan a preliminary five-year budget for the
Redevelopment (non-housing) fund. The Agency adopts its budget on an annual basis; as such
actual revenues and expenditures may differ from those forecasts presented in the
Implementation Plan and are therefore subject to change, most particularly as a result of the
pending decision of the California Supreme Court on the future operation and existence of
Redevelopment Agencies. Projections of revenues and expenditures contained within this
Implementation Plan were based upon the assumptions delineated below:
Cash Flow General Assumptions
1. Until such time as California law mandates otherwise, resources available to the Agency
include net tax increment revenues, Agency identified miscellaneous revenues and
interest income.
2. Current Debt Service Obligations — includes the annual debt service for the 1999 and
2002 Tax Allocation Bonds, as well as participation obligations and loan repayments
from Agency-identified project activities.
3. Administration and Other Requirements — Administrative costs and other expenditures
related to Agency operations were, and continue to be, based upon current operational
expenses. As a result,of losses anticipated to the Agency's revenue, five (5) FTE
Agency employee positions were eliminated in the 2011-2012 Agency budget.
4. State Budget Take Away -Assembly Bills AB 1x26 and AB 1x27 were signed into law on
June 28, 2011. AB 1x26 eliminated Redevelopment Agency operations statewide, and
AB 1x27 enabled Agency survival through a "pay or play" scenario that will result in a
$6.2 million payment to the State of California in January 2012, with a further payment
of approximately $1.5 million in 2013. A case was filed by the California Redevelopment
Association, and was heard in the California Supreme Court on November 10, 2011.
The Court has up to 90 days to issue its ruling, but until such time as the ruling is
issued, the Agency must assume these payments will take place.
5. City General Fund Repayment — The Agency adopted a statement of Enforceable
Payment Obligations to protect the annual repayment to the City General Fund as part
of the Agency's efforts to continue operating under the requirements of AB 1x27. The
Agency assumes that the outstanding indebtedness to the City General Fund will be
repaid annually with a repayment schedule that increases approximately 2% annually.
xB -849- Item 28. - 22
Merged Project Area Implementation Plan — Midterm Review
2009/10 — 2013/14 Implementation Plan Page 18
6. Discretionary Expenditures - To the extent future tax increment revenue resources
continue to be allocated to the Agency and to the extent allowable under the laws of the
State of California, and exceed existing and allowable payments for debt service and
contractual obligations under AB 1x27, projects and administrative costs, the cash flow
projection assumes that the Agency will exercise its discretion in funding other future
projects, programs or activities of benefit to the Merged Project Area through FY 2013-
14.
ADMINISTRATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
As detailed in the introduction of this Midterm Review, the Agency is required to produce an
Implementation Plan every five years. After adoption of the first Implementation Plan, a new plan
is to be adopted every five years wither in conjunction with the housing element cycle or the
implementation plan cycle.
Implementation Plan Adoption
Each Implementation Plan must be presented and adopted at a duly noticed public hearing of the
Agency. The Implementation Plan for the Project Area was adopted at the City
Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting of December 21, 2009. The Agency may amend the
Implementation Plan at any time after conducting a public hearing on the proposed amendment.
Mid-Term Implementation Plan Review Process
At least once within the five-year term of the Implementation Plan, the Agency must conduct a
public hearing and allow testimony from all interested parties for the purpose of reviewing the
Plan, and the corresponding implementation for each redevelopment project. This hearing must
take place no earlier than two years and no later than three years after the adoption of the
Implementation Plan.
Item 28. - 23 HB -850-
ATTACHMENT #2
Hdk,1 Item z8 . za
C
N °
00
N
�
slim
Midterm Review
❑ Public hearing to evaluate progress of the Five-Year Implementation
Plan for the Project Area
Required under Community Redevelopment Law {California Health and
Safety Code §33490(c)}
❑ Purpose of the Review is to provide a summary of plan goals, status
^ of projects and outline remaining activities for the Project Area
W
Subareas:
• Yorktown/Lake
• Talbert/Beach
• Main-Pier
Added Main-Pier
N Huntington Center
N
O�
r-r
CD
N
00
Plan Goals
J
❑ Eliminate and prevent the ❑ Encourage community
spread of blight participation
❑ Expand commercial base of ❑ Recycle or develop
the Project Area underutilized parcels and
x eliminate impediments to
redevelopment
❑ Improve public facilities, public
infrastructure, and inadequate
drainage infrastructure ❑ Implement appropriate design
standards
❑ Promote local job
opportunities ❑ Develop housing opportunities
for all income levels
Midterm Accomplishments
❑ Bella Terra Phase II; Edinger Plaza (Watt Commercial); The
Boardwalk; Decron; Beach/Atlanta
❑ At least 100 new jobs at The Strand, minimum of 350 more to
come from Beach/Edinger Projects
❑ Concrete alleys in Main-Pier Subarea; concrete, asphalt and
other public improvements in Oakview Subarea
❑ Implementation of Downtown Image Committee
Recommendations
❑ City Hall Seismic Retrofit
❑ ADA Upgrades to Art Center and Fire Stations
00
00
N
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO EVALUATE TE PROGRESS OF THE FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT MERGED PROJECT AREA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach ("Agency") will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 19, 2011 at 6:00 PM or soon
thereafter in the City Council Chambers located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
California, to evaluate the progress of the Five Year Implementation Plan (2010-2014) for the
Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the Implementation
Plan is to identify the specific goals and objectives for the project area, describe the specific
programs, including potential projects and estimated expenditures that would be made during
the five years, and explain how these activities will eliminate blight. This public hearing will
provide a midterm review to evaluate the progress of the redevelopment plan and
corresponding implementation plan.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or
submit to the City Clerk written evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you
challenge the City Council/Agency's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues that you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further
questions, you may contact Ms. Simone Slifman at the Huntington Beach Economic
Development Department at (714) 375-5186. Please direct any written communication to:
JOAN L. FLYNN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET—2ND FLOOR
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
(714) 536-5227
CityClerkAgenda()-surfcity-hb.org
http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/
To be Published November 24 and December 1 and December 8, 2011
For the posted notice:
Please do not remove this POSTED NOTICE
until after the public hearing scheduled for December 19, 2011
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FORM
MEETING DATE: "bVP�('ZP�YV} i I
SUBJECT: WwVnw6w it ,�5•�1t^ fr �
DEPARTMENT:
CONTACT NAME: ►'�O i � PHONE: �J�ID
N/A YES NO
( ) (x) ( ) Is the notice attached?
( } ( ( ) Do the heading and closing of the notice reflect a hearing before
the City Council and/or Redevelopment Agency?
( ) ( } ( ) Are the date, day and time of the public hearing correct?
(J() ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice?
(X) ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, does the notice include appeal language?
Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council?
( ) ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication?
( ) ( ) ( Is a larger ad required? Size
Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and
accuracy of the mailing list?
Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels?
( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, is the Coastal Commission part of
the mailing labels?
( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the resident labels attached?
KA ( ) ( ) Is Summary Report 33433 attached? (Redevelopment Agency items only)
YN
What is the minimum number of days from publication to hearing date? I r (�1q
What is the minimum number of times to be published?
What is the specified number of days between publications?
FOR ADMINISTRATION AND CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Approved for pubBc'heari g Date noticed to n6wspap rr
// 1/0 - -
Date published - ( Date notices'mailed p d
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC
PROOF O rC HEARING,
� ' Of-THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY Of THE CITY OF
PUBLICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO EVALUATE TE PROGRESS
OF THE FIVE-YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
FOR THE HUNTINGTON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) BEACH REDEVELOPMENT
MERGED PROJECT AREA
SS. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV-
EN that-the Redevelop-
) menf Agency of the City
COUNTY OF ORANGE
of 'Huntington Beach
("Agency") will hold a
public hearing on Mon-
day,December 19,2011
at 6:00 PM or soon
am a citizen of the United States and a thereafter in the City
resident of the County of Los Angeles; I council Chambers I Gated at 2000 Main
am over the age of eighteen years, and street, Huntington
Beach, California; to
not a party to or Interested in the notice evaluate the progress of
the Five Year Implemen-
published. I am a principal clerk of the for_ the c2o10-2ol n
' for- the Huntington
Beach Merged Redevel-
HUNTINGTON BEACH opment Project Area.
The purpose of the lm-
INDEPENDENT, .which was adjudged a;. plementation Plan is to ;. -
identify the specific
newspaper of general circulation on goals and objectives for
the project
September 29, 1961, case A6214, and area, de-
scribe the specific pro-
June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the grams, including pote tial projects and
,
estimated expenditures
City of Huntington Beach, County of that would be made
during the five years,
Orange, and the State of California. and explain how these
activities will eliminate
Attached to this Affidavit is a true and blight.This public hear-
ing,will provide a.mid-
com lete co printed and term review to evaluate
p copy as was p the progress of the re-
published on the following date(s): development, plan.and
corresponding imple-
mentation plan.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
Thursday November 24, 2011, SONS are invited to at-
Thursday December 1, 2011 8e tend said hearing and
.;.express .opinions or
submit to the City Clerk
Thursday December 8, 2011
written evidence•for or '
against the application
as outlined above. If
you challenge the City
Council/Agency's action
in court, you may be
limited to raising only
I certify (or declare) under penalty those issues that you or
someone else raised at
of perjury that the foregoing is true the p scribed
hearing de
in this notice or
in writen core-.
and correct. spondence delive edr to
the City at'
or prior to,
the public. hearing. If
there are any further
questions, you may
contact Ms. Simone
Executed on August 29, 2011 3lifman of the o nomicn mi
ton Beach Eccoc.
at Los Angeles, California Development Depart-
ment at g ' 5186"Please 7dire 3 direct any
written communication'
to:
JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY
CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET-
2ND FLOOR.
HUNTINGTON BEACH;
Signature CALIFORNIA9264$ ,
g (714)536-5227
CityClerkAgenda@ ..!
surfcity-h b.org
http://wwWhuntmgton
beachca:gov/.
Published Huntington
Beach Independent No-
vember 24,-December 1,
and December 8,2011.
NOTICE OF.A PUBLIC
HEARING
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
PROOF O F AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH
I TO EVALUATE TE PROGRESS
PUBLICATION . OF THE FIVE-YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
'FOR THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT
STATE OF CALI FO R N I A) MERGED PROJECTAREA
NOTICE IS HERR AREA
GIV-
EN that the Redevelop-
ment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach
) ("Agency
COUNTY OF ORANGE Will hold
public hearing on Mon-
day,December 19,2011
at 6:00 PM or soon
thereafter in the City
Council Chambers lo-
am a citizen of the United States and a cated at 2000 Main
Street,. Huntington
resident of the County of Los Angeles; I Beach, California, to
evaluate the progress of
am over the age of eighteen years, and the Five Year implemen-
tation Plan (2010-2014)
not a art to Or interested in the notice for the Huntington
party Beach Merged'Redevel-
published. I am a principal clerk of the opment. Project Area.
p p The purpose of the Im-
HUNTINGTON BEACH identify ith Plan is is
identify the specific
INDEPENDENT, which..was adjudged a goalshe and o objectives
f
newspaper of general circulation on ;' scribe the specific pro-
grams, including poten-
September 29, 1961, case A6214, and tial projects and
estimated ,expenditures.
June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the that would be made
during the 'five years,
and explain how these
City Of Huntington Beach, County Of
activities will eliminate
Oran a and the State Of California. blight.This public hear-
g r ing will provide a mid-1
Attached to this Affidavit is a true and term review to evaluate
ate
the progress of the re-
complete copy as was printed and development plan and
corresponding imple-
published on the following date(s): ALL INTE TE plan.
ALL RESTED PER-
SONS are invited to at-
tend said hearing and
Thursday November 24, 2011, express opinions or
submit to the City Clerk
Thursday December 1, 2011 & written evidence,for or
against the.application
Thursday December 8 e 2011 as outlined above: If
you challenge the City
Council/Agency's.action
in court, you may be
limited to raising only
those issues that you or
I certify (or declare) under penalty someone else raised the public hearing de-
scribed in this notice or
of perjury.that the foregoing is true in written, erectcor to
spondence delivered to
the City at, or prior to,
and correct. the public hearing. If
there'are any'further .
questions, you may
contact Ms. Simone ,
.Slifman at the Hunting- i
ton Beach Economic
on August 29, 2011 meat at (7 Depart-
Executed , 375
ment at (714)• 375-
5186. Please direct any
at Los Angeles, California written °°min°"'gat'°"
JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY
CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET-
2ND FLOOR
HI BEACH,-
i,
CALIFORNIACALORNI 92648
(714)536-5227
CityCl erkAgen d a
Signature surfcity-hb.org
http://www.huntington .I
beachca.gov/
Published Huntington
Beach Independent No-
vember 24,December 1,1
and December 8;2011_