Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Redevelopment Agency - Focused Environmental Impact Report f
i 1� �•I 11 DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT t FOR THE y' OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT .1 Msy, 1982 •I i 1 i S- I, Transmittal authorized by Redevelopment Agency- on May 17, 1982 (Resolution too. 29) ii I ' _. J 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section i 1.0 SUMMARY 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 6 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION 7 MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 16 f 6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 16 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 17 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS 17 1 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 17 i0.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 18 i APPENDIX Al LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19 i APPENDIX B, INITIAL STUDY 20 I� f 1 1.0 SUMMARY The proposed project consists of adoption of a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the 30-acre Oakvlew Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the plan is to remove existing blight and improve the physical and economic well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the rehabilitation and Infllling of housing the development of commercial and office i space and construction of much needed public improvements. The Plan also providev for assemblage and sale of selected properties and portions of proVartles to the Redevelopment Agency. However, if owners in these parcels are desirous of participating In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopr:ient Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This Impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency'st (1) teking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of the selected properties to be acquired at fair market value, ('L) initiating such negotiations ns soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and (3) keeping all concerned cnntinuously apprised of ! the Agency's progress and its activities. The impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to bo positiva j over the long term. Construction of modern well-planned commercial development and the rehabilitation and construction of residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting Influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Qroject Area could experience certain negative Impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise end dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In j develcpment of modern and well-designed commercial and office facilities, new housing, public Improvements and the rehabilitation of existing residential units which will eliminate the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and eennomic vitality of the City of Huntington �. Beach. As presently envisioned, it Is the desire of the Agency to rehabilitate and construct approximately 100 residential units and to create approximately 300,000 square feet of new office and commercial development over the same time period. The total value of Improvements is LxDected to e::ceed $35,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity, the Agency anticipates very few, If any, relocation of existing residences. • I The precise layout of new development, phasing and level of activity Is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted If required by C.E.O.A. The generalized Impacts of an additional 100 residential units and a net 300,0D0 square feet of new commercial/office development Is discussed In further detail t in this report. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared pursuant to i the State EIR Guidelines for the Oakvlew Redevelopment Plan. This EIR is j intended to provide.dectalon makers with useful Information on the impact of the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to sdoptlon of the plan I by .the 4 Huntington Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken In Implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plan will be. subject to further environmental r evaluation In accordance with the California. Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 2.2 Prooect Location The pr%osed project is located In the City of Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile southeast of downtown Los Angeles (refer to Figure 1). The proposed Oakview Redevelopment Project as selected by the Huntington Beanh City Planning Commission consists of approximately 30 acres as shown In Figure 2 and as legally described In Appendix A. 2.3 Prolect Chiectives As outlined In the proposed Redevelopment clan, the objectives are to: Eliminate blighting influences, Including deteriorating buildingb, Incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public Improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve the overall appearance of existing buildings, streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings, + new and old, are safe for persons and businesses to occupy. i Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Area to participate In the redevelopment activities. Provldi,g adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. i f4tigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that they constitute a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. -2- �.� �• •.•ff[M / r C ....... • • .•'� f 1:O yWy11iiC Zi ws!••. • �.. �...�.i•� .i.'.•• ' �K•s+iis ji v ? r34 f W•ff if{ • allKi:F• f •• •s!1� � —_— • 464f si.•f6110068 got �••.... 1 ,�s,� ties .n.a •! • lk .c.•.a • _S �`���'. •^�•�� s.••• .to to •.. i} •.►.f... 64,00 p } Ck s Ma.i.IfJ C] c •• Vic ss..wssi =0M `• w r [ j t I I •,nsl�a... i 71060. ' `'•� �••" • O 1 i • ►.n•s LDS LkGCLCS •� � � � _1 ...... .. wf.fef p• Qs••►..t r ORAI;ai COUNTY 4 if s..s.•J A _ It Shaft" oe& to �06%,Llmvoft. .n .[s.ifa.sua.0 s••rY_ ■..csa+c �NI Op��S� • ca.[r oft ��•••' . _ VICINITY MAC' • sca t�raa ' of �\ o HUNTINGTON. SEACR �� o[a[- i (� •, ', • �Ai/�f��U11AI11111>fwitl�I�I���i�If r�Ul�lf,r♦I ljtijltAj��� le tJ Div LKE � ,. r 1•. w fs 1 1 / 1 1 ••��.. ,,tttt t r • t'� 1 ' j�W•�i Lid"f w 01 / 1 } i -all • x• +!� rrY 212.1; w. 11 ' A low olm asoo � SAW r .0y • , •r/ • Ifwr w r/ • e saw ` O 1 r f r/ iw w•• ~ 4w r O ` • = r 0• #*one fw/f 1 0' ' fl••M�YI/ . fr•f 1 � � . o :t• �'.t'•� • 11 Z.:.. r O • �' Iwo df•f/� +T+ o L G) mix" I. : CD ••� •, •.:1 ■ H US=I A I all IT 1 ':/ y, • »i•• j ■ U • . CD 1 ��• • ' JL 12"I i/alltilrltwow1dfil1Ir11mom IMIWN4 does tlNM1--••y �—= =1 �-- OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA FIGURE 2 Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. Providing construction and employment opportunties In the rehabilitation and development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed commercial/office facilities. Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. • Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive ; development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards arxi environmental quality. r Providing for relocation asalstance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the provisions of 1. the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. 2.4 Protect Implementation To implement the proposed project, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Is proposing the fo!lowing activities within the Oakview Project Areas :t Possible Acquisition and sale of property. Y Rehabilitation of structures. K" - Participation by owners and tenants through the Improvement of their properties or through other opportunities to participate in this or other redevelopment projects. 14 - Relocation ussistance to displaced residential and nonresidential occupants as required by law. - Development of better parking, landscaping and public improvement concepts and facilities. ?:+ Demolition, clebrance of properties acquired, provide public Improvements, building and site preparation. - Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants In the improvements of their properties to carry out the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. - Possible closure of streets and widening of alleys to provide Improved security and additional open space. i II --- — 1 The land uses, layout of principal itreats, population densities and Wilding Intensities and standards which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: 2.4.1 Land Uses Residential. Primarily medium to high density residential uses including condominium development. - Commercial. Principal uses would Include general retail commercial and office facilities. 2.4.2 PrinriaalStreets Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street system. Local street and alley improvements will be Installed where necessary. 2.4.3 Population Densities, i Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 7-15 dwelling units per gross acre for Medium Density Residential development and 25-35 dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. 2.4.4 t3uIldtng Intensities All commercial, office and residential users throughout the Project Area shall � conform to or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the final Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. 2.4.5 Standards Minimum standards for the Project Area Include current specifications for public works construction, building codes, zonlog and subdivision regLiations and r all other applicable local, county and state regulations. 2.5 Project Duration Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent Domain proceedings shall be limited to 12 year3 from adoption of the plan. 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing environment for the City of Huntington Beach Is well documented In the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Community Profile, the Huntington Beach Miscellaneous Historical Data and several previous environmental impact reports all of which are on file with the City of Huntington 3each Planning Department. f -g- I f t I 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND U A RIDABLE EFFECTS This section of the Focused Environmental Impact Report will examine the general impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific impacts of the type of dove lopment/redevelopment that Is presently envlaloned by the Agency. As prsvlously indicated, Individual projects that are Implemented over the next several years will be subject to further environmental evaluation In accordance with C.E.G.A. 4.1 General Impacts of Redevelopment As stated in the Preliminary Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, the general Impact upon the residents of the Project Area and on the surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1) blighted areas will be replecad with new or rehabilitated structures, (2) re►ocation of residents when necessary will be In compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) therc will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. However, as described above, this loss would not constitute a significant impact as the development mill be consistent with present zoning and the anticipated uses will be beneficial to the community. In addition to these items discussed In the Preliminary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneficially impact the Project Area by: • Providing additional affordable decent, safe and sanitary housing to the existing atock within the City of Huntington Beach. - Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to encourage new construction and reinvestment by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with a stronger economic base. - MitigatIng development ;imitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it causes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. j - Providing construction and employment opportunities In the development and rehabilitation of housing and commercial/office facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of new commercial/office farilities. - Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as 1 necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted reuses within the Project Area In accordance with modern competitive development practices. { -7- The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned while providing for the assemblage and sale of selected properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency anticipates few, If any, acquisitions. limiever, If owners in these parcels are desirous of participating in the prs�act, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the I Agency's: (1) taking deliberate eteps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acqulred at fair market value*, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced and are quallfied`for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process_ of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and its activities. Although the Impact of relocation could be negative, its long-term impact Is expected to be positive In that relocatlon will afford residences In the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The .Impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborh6od: Is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development of modern, well-planned Industrial and residentlal devalopments will provide an economic and aesthetic: Impetus to } � the surrounding areas. Furthermore, in achieving,such development, existing blighting Influences will be Irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it Is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative Impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these Impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result in development of modern and well-designed facliltles which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the , City of Huntington Beach. , * Under Eminent Domain Law (1263.320) fair market value of the property taken Is the � P P Y highest price on the date: of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing � to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obliged to sell and a buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the purposes for which the property Is reasonably adaptable and available. When the Agency purchases property, It usually will pay cash. This is of additional benefit to potential displacees when compared to today's "creative financing" type of transaction, where the seller usually ends up receiving monthly payments on a part of their equity. Sellers usually have one additional year to purchase comparable property before they are required to pay capital gains tax, because most redevelopment transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. i -a- � The proposed redevelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the implementation of the General Plan and its goals and objectives which have guided the development of the City since Its adoption. 4.2 Specific Impacts of Presently Envisioned Redevelopment Activities As presently envisioned, it Is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the construction or rehabilitation of, approximately 100 residential units and to assist In the creation of approximately 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development. The WWI value of improvements would be approximately $359000,000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of very few, If any, residences. The precise location of new development, phasing and level of activity is Impossible to predict at this time. Ab development proposals come before the Agency, individual environmental evaluations will be conducted as required by C.E.G.A. The generalized Impacts of 100 new and rehabilitated residential units and a net 3009000 square feet of new commercial/office development can be summarized as follows: *Residential - 100 Units - 1,000 vehicle trips per day Increase - 150.parking spaces Increase - 25,000 gallons of sewerage per day Increase - 30,000 gallons of water per day Increase 500 pe1inds of solid waste,per day increase 110 potential maximum student increase - 220 population increase *Commercial/Office - 300,00D Square Feet - 4,000 vehicle trips per day increase +' - 1,200 parking spaces increase 500000 gallons of sewerage per -!ay increase j - 60,000 gallons of water per day Increase f - 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase A population Increase of 220 will probably not require the addition of firemen and related equipment, pollcemen and related equipment, and will not require additional educational facilities or the addition of sewer and water facilities. The costs for providing any required Cervices could be provided by the Redevelopment Agency. It is anticipated that some changes will be required In the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and in the solid waste management system. The proposed project would generate about 19400 pounds of emission per day. Mcre detailed Information will be required prior to Implementation of Ino:vlduai development projects. I * Estimates have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associates using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. -9- i I 1 Although It Is impossible to project specific activia les, it is presently envisioned that Agency assistance will be required to Implement up to 100 housing units and up to 300,000 square feet of commercial/of;lce development. 4.3 Mitigation Measures The-proposed Redevelopment Plan Is a means to mitigate the Impact of blight In the Project Area and Improve the social, environmental and economic conditions in the City. While the project Is beneficial, minor adverse impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered at this stage of the redevelopment process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed in accordance with provisions of the Uniform Building Code which governs construction relative to seismic movement. Onsite grading and earth removal will be performed to the + setisfactiun of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosion of soils, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the en engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No proper 9 9 Y unusual mitigating measures beyond the regular controls of the City are proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Air ' As mitigating measures, the ,agency will encourage improved circulation, the 1 extension and improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usdge, energy ! conservation, bike routes, paths and open space and green areas. 4.3.3 Water Development as proposed by the Redevelopment Plan will create an additional demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher intensity development may require expanding capacity and Improving local street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a more specific Indication of actual site development plans occur. No specific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.4 Plant Life The project will remove no significant vegetation since none is In existence. Landscaping will negate the impact of providing an urban land use on currently vacant and redeveloped property. Landscaping is anticipated to be In excess of City standards. 4.3.5 Animal Life The Project Area Is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. Landscaping of the Project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhance a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. _10- i i 4.3.6 Noise Noise levels In the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to increase significantly. Normal construction of building is anticipated to provide a minimum o.,tside-to-Inside attenuation of 22dBA which will reduce the Inside noise to a level approaching 45dBA. No additional mitigation measures beyond the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City's Noise Ordinance will be required. Noise from traffic within the Project Area will be reduced because of Agency/City Improvements to road surfacing and traffic control equipment. In addition, implementation of Section 27160 (a) of the California Vehicle Code for auto and truck manufacturers will result In a decreass In noise levels from engines and tires; by 1907 all vehicles must be at levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 1-Ight and Glare Landscaping will "soften" the vistial impact of the possible light and glare resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area. Landscaping plans for each redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers for approval by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency a;ld the City Council. The City will i also exercise sign control and architecti-ral control over the new development In the Project Area. 4.3.8 Land Use r: As previously stated, the lend uses of the Project Area are proposed to be redeveloped to mitigate blighted conditions. Existing and future residential development will be buffered from adjacent developments to mitigate any potential conflict from adjacent uses. 4.3.9 Natural Resources Wherever feasible, exipting structures and improvements that are scheduled for demolition will be recycled to conserve on the consumption of natural resource. I 4.3.10 Risk of Upset dal No significant hazard of explosion or hazardous substances Is anticipated. No F mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.11 Population J It Is •-*crubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantially great enough to create a significant adverse Impact to the City. It is not anticipated that relocation resistance will be required, however, If it Is, relocation activities will be conducted In eccorderv:e with State law. ii 1 ' -I1- Relocation Assistance. The Agency shall assist all persons (incitiding families and others) displaced from the project by the Agency in finding other locations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences he necessary to carry out the project, perrions displaced from their homes .,nail be assisted by the Agency In finding housing that is decent, safe and sanlEary; within their financial means; In i easonably convenient locations; and as otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency is authorized to provide housing inside or outside the Project Area for those persons displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. Relocation Payments. The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons including families and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses for which reimbursement or compensation Is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs Incurred bi the saie of their property to the j Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall mare every effort to relocate individuals and families. Temoorary Relocation Housing. The Agency Is authorized to provide temporary relocation housing on cleared sites within the Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, standard and decent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prior to permanent disposition and development of such cleared sites. If feasible and desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites outside the Project ArRa for providing relocation Dousing resources. The Agency Is Also authorized to provide temporary relocation housing In houses acquired by the Agency that are being held for sale and/or rehabilitation. 4.3.12 Housing. Not less than --0 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant tc Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of incrsaaing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons find families of low or moderate Income, as defined in the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined In Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: That no need exists In the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Ini:ime households; or That some stated percentage, less than 20 percent, of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing needs; or -12- i .. That n substantial effort to ineet Inw and moderate income linusinq noeds in the community is being made, and that this effort including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate Income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allo-,ated, under this section, Is equivalent in Impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of 01splacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low Income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation Redevelopment will assist In correcting Interior circulation resulting In Improved traffic flow and provide Improved access and additional parking for both residential and commercial/office developments. 4.3.14 Public Services No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, additional manning of such services as fire protection, building inspections and police protection, etc. will b-i necessary to maintain the same leval of service thac now exists. I 4.3.15 End The following energy conservation measures are recommended for the new and renovated structures: Use of as much solar and alternate energy as Is feasible. - Open gas lighting should not be used In public or private buildings. - Electric lights should lie strategically placed to maximize theirs, efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. - E:lectr � al heating In public and private structures should be discouraged. + SolQr rsalsted heating systems should be encouraged. j I - Ref,rcting and/or Insulating glass should be used In structures where v'.�r• , vs are not shaded by exterior architectural projections or mature 4.3.16 Utilities j No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. i -13- Y• • 4.3.17 Human Health No mitigation measures are. proposed at this time. However, it should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be Improved by being relocated into housing that is decent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.10 Aesthetics Architecture and landscaping site plans will be approved by the CE:y. - Incompatible Uses. No use or structure which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor or similar factor would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. - Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels. Parcels in the Project Area, Including any parcels retained by a participant, will not be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. - Limitation of Building Density. The number of buildings in the Project Area will be consistent with building Intensities permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. - Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildlnys. The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable hate statutes and local zoning, building and other applicable codes and rrdinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. - Open Space, Landscaping and Parking. The approximate amount of open ' speca to be provided in the Project Area is the total of all areas which will be in the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the open space around buildings, and all other amounts of outdoor areas not permitted through limits on land coverage by the Plan to ba covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where new construction or rehabilitation occurs shall be submUted to the Agency for review and approval to ensure appropriateness and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets and public and private parking shall be r;ovided for in each development consistent with or exceee.... City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time. Any private Etroets or off-street parking must. also comply with regulations imposed ty the Redevelopment Plan. Light, Air and Privacy. In all areas, sufficient space shall be maintained between buildings and structurus to provide adequate light, air and privacy. -14- Sims. Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearance by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flasillitg, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted in the Project Area. The Agency shall ;armit only those signs necessary for identification of buildings, pramises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to tho Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. 4.3.19 Recreation The provision of additional open space as presently envisioned should improve recreational opportunities. 4.3.20 Archeological/Histo�rlca_l Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified Individual will be retained to Investigate the significance of the Items, catalog and remove same for further study and preservation. No other mitigation measures are proposed. 4.3.21 Development Standards New Construction. All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws in effect from time to time Including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses. Any existing structures within the Project Area which meet the standards for rehabilitation may be repaired, altered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, if necessary, in surh manner that will meat the following requirements: o Be safe, sanitary and sound In all physical respects. o Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the reha!-llitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington Beach. o Shall conform to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. o Shall be comparable In appearance to the architecture of the on-site proposed new structures. 4.4 Unavoidable Effacts The proposed project should Improve the community's overall economic situation and, as is result, bring about more job opportunities, increase population and provide a higher cpiallty of life for the residents of Huntington Beach. These factors, In turn, will pi_e a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, power and land resources, as well as contribute to air and noise pollution. I -15- _ 1 i The Implementation of the Plan will result in the rehabilitation and construction of houaing structures and construction of commercial/office buildings; the pavement of streets, alleys and parking lots; and the development of other facilities that will probably result In Increased rainfall runoff. During the course of Implementing the project, there will be some temporary disruption to normal activities due to construction. Construction, as well as the provision of public improvements, will result In the utilization of certain natural resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum and lumber. Implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan will result in the acquisition of certain property and the relocation of owners and tenants. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.i No Pro ect The "no project" alternative would allow the Project Area to continue in a blighted condition for an Indefinite period. The application of existing federal, state and local funds is not adequate to significantly prevent existing deterioration or to significantly improve .existing conditions. 5.2 Smaller Project Area Designation of a smaller project area will not achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan or eliminate the blighted conditions. 5.3 Larger Project Area E3tablishment of a larger project area would require more extensive Investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not i necessarIly enhance the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plan's objectives. 6.0 LOCAL SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS The Redevelopment Plan provides policy direction in the establishment of land use categories In accordance with the General Plan. The Plan further provides for the acquisition of property, rehabilitation and construction of structures; relocation of some families; installation or reconstruction of streets and allays, utilities and other site improvements; and financial methods for implementing the project. The Redevelopment Plan is designed to provide direction for the transition from present short-term policies to the long-range goals and objectives of Huntington Bea.ch. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective for 35 years. Not to Implement the Plan at this time would be to intensify the conditions of blight and deterioration that exist within the Project Area. If Implemented, the Plan would arrest these conditions over the long-term, and would help promote the economic and physics! well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. i _16- +i i Concerning underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects will be n !oss of open space and some resources. The F:nject Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, relocation of households and construction and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the intensity of residential development will Increase and will result In additional congestion. Noise end air emissions In the Project Area would likewise Increase. 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS ! Although the project will result in the utilization of certain resources such an sand, petroleum and lumber In the construction and Implementation of its various proposals, and will result in the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, it Is unlikely that the Impacts of the implemontation of the project would result In any more adverse environmental changes than would the continued. growth of the City under normal conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the improvements called for in the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed Irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land already committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the steps outlined in thin report. 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as a series of events In casual sequence beginning with job creations The creation of new jobs then leads to job shifts and vacancies, followed by Immigration and a demand for shelter. This, in turn, Is followed by an ordering of land uses and a shifting of the spatial configuration of the labor supply. The shifting of the locetion of the supply of labor is a stimulus for the new Incation of business and other economic actl%,ity creating jobs and starting the growth cycle over again. The regional growth cycle constitutes the source of the demand for the construction of private and public incilities. The actual physical pattern of the growth In the City Is the result of the chronological order and size in which specific parcels of land ere developed. The relatively email size parcels hay" limited the growth and development possibilities In the Project Area. The consolidation of parcels In the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden the possibilities for more Intense development and growth. ` The implementation of the project will have a growth inducing Impact to the City by Increasing the population by about 220 persons. The proposed project will expand the housing stock of the City by about 100 units and will increase employment opportunities. 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study as Insignificant (Appendix B) included primarily those related to land, water, plant and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. These impacts were dismissed primarily because they are not affected by the proposed project. -17- -q I 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom 'rincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Pra act, April, 1902. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Proposed Redevel� oment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air_Quality-Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports, SLAG. 10.5 Geotechnical huts, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources Survey and inventory, Huntington Beach, Califomia, Archaeological Research, Inc., April 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendment, E1R 81-6, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services. t 1U.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. 1 f f -18- , Appendix "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PRW.CT Beginning at the intersection of the north line of Warner Avenue and the northerly exten- sion of the west line of Oak Lane, 60 feet in width, as shown on a map of Tract Number 368, recorded in Book 15, Page 31 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the orangeCotmty Recorder; thence southerly along said northerly extension, the westerly line of said Oak Lane and its southerly extension to the nort}t line of Tract Number 4091 recorded in Book 174, Page 10 of Miscellaneous raps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence westerly along said north line to the west line of said Tract 4091; thence southerly along said west line and its southerly extension to the south line of Slater Avenue; thence easterly along said south line to the southerly extension of the easterly line of Keelson Lane as shown on a map of Tract Number 5057 recorded in Book 182, Page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly along; said southerly extension and the easterly line of said Keelson Lane to the easterly ex- tension of the northerly line of a 20.00 foot alley, adjacent to and southerly to Lot 3 of said Tract 5057; thence westerly along said easterly extension and the north line of said alley to the southerly extension of the easterly line of the 20.00 foot alley adja- cent to and westerly from Lots 3 through 11 of said Tract Number 5057; thence northerly along said southerly extension and easterly line of said alley to the north lire of said Tract Number S057; thence westerly along said north litre to the easterly line of Queens Lane as shown on a map of Tract Number 4301, recorded in Book 177, Page 11 of Miscellancou Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly, north-westerly, north- erly and north-westerly along, the east line of said Queens Lane to the cast line of Said Tract Maber 4301; thence northerly along said east line to the south line of Kandrell Drive as shown on said Tract Number 4301; thence. easterly, north-easterly, northerly, north-westerly and northerly along the line of Mindrell Drive which changes to Ash Lane as it turns north to the south line of Block E of Tract Number 436 recorded in Book 16, Page 28 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence easterl; along south line of Block E and Block F of said Tract Number 436 to the west lane of the cast 237.42 feet of Lot 5 of said filock F; thence north along said west line to the north line of said Lot S; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 217.42 feet of Lot 4 of said Block F; thence northerly along said west line and its northerly extension to the south line of Lot 1 of said Block F; thence easterly along said south line and its easterly extension to the centerline of Beach Boulevard; thence northerly along said centerline to the north line of Warner Avenue, thence westerly along said north line to the point of beginning. -19- ik CONTINUATION ANUT FOR FLUNG ADMINSTRATWE 111OULATIONS Appendix 118" WITH THE SI1CRITARY OF STATE (I-06"t to Ge"11 0111 Code Lea1M 11360.1) -25.. 55. A.ppendix J is added to react: APPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: f Huntillgton Beach FROM: Huntin ton Beach Rejeyelo ment (Responsible Agency) (Lead Agency)— gency 2000 Main Street 2000 Main Street tAddress) -` ress Huntington Beach, California 92648 Huntington Beach, California 92648 SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report ) The Huntington Beach yep nt Aaency will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an env ron)aen al impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval :or the project. ' M i The project description, location, and the probable environmental z effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial Study /x is, /"7 is not, attached. t Due to the tiLle limits mandated by State law, your respponse must be x sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after j S receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Tom Tincher at the address shown above. We will nee a name for a co—n-EMET peroon in Your agency, PROJECT TITLE: OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE April 2R, 1982 Si gnat `Title Executive Director Telephone 714 536-5575 Reference: California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sections 15035.7,, 15054.3, 15066. i •20- ' toN'rtwv,eror� r� FOR VIUM9 ADMINISTRATIVE RIODUT10Nf WVN tail WKWAA7 O! STATi tt'ww�rt M DrPft-M1 Cw s iwq�� iti�4t= 774 APP'3ndix I is Added to read: A p�NDIX = ENVIROMMAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) 1. BACKGROUND 1• Name Of Proponent Hunti ton Beach Redevelo ment A enc 2. Address and Pttone wn er n o f Frnponen ; Str et P.O. Box 190 (. 42 3. - Date of Checklist Submitted �4. Agency Requiring Checklist "�`a� 5 198z 5. Name of proposal, if aPA11ca__ � ea w �nnnmunt Angacy . �I e - `+`i Plan 11• ENVIRONM WAL IMPACTS n attached s e all "yr�b" and "Maybe" anewere are required � on attached sheets. ) YES MA AYBE NO will the proposal result in: So Unstable earth conditions changes in geologicnubstruotures?h 8 b. Disruptions, displacements, Coln. a.. _-. . Pdction or overcovering of the Boil; X a. Chenge ih to surface relief PeatlLres7 or f��'Q4:Ttd d• The destruction, covering or modification of Any unique geologic or physical features? e• .Any increases in wind or water x erosion of soils, either on or off the aiwe? f. Changes In depaeltlon or erosion beech Banda, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel pr a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or Any bSY, inlet ar lake? -21- •.t... .. . . . � a .. .. .. i "»400A CONTiNUAT1Ok $HIRT ' F0h FILING ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS WITH TH! SACRITARY 01 STATE (hinwM IN 00"M IKf C«d6 SK%*4 11310.1) YF:S MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failu:,e, or similar hazards? X 2. Air Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odora? X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Way Will the proposal result In: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X j y b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage andamountt ofesurface water runoff? ulloff. $ c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X j e. Discharge into surface waters, or i In any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to termperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters" as Change in the quantity of ground watere, either through direct additions I or withdrawals, or through interception 1 Y of an :aquifer by cute or excavations? X -22- _,..� ... .. . .. .. . .. .__.. _,.. ... .. ..r...' r.'.'::l'.+7' .'4"..i f..rl•,p S.:.J.1.YAy.-yt gem 100r. COMRMUMOM �MiR MR IIUN4 ADMINIMATIYIi RWULMONA WITH TKI iiCRr'I'ARY Of STAIN YE':! MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available I for public water supplies? ^_.._ �X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards ouch as } flooding or tidal. waves? _X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result n•• a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X e. Introduction of new species of - plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of � existingspecies? X s •'d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal , ;? result n: > , a. Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic or anismes, insects or microfaunag? a, b. Reduction of the numbers of any ` unique, rare of endangered species of aninale? _X_.. r ..._. e. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X -23- CO"IMIATION SHIRT FOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVI RIOUI,ATIONS WITH THI SICRITARY OF STAIN (1`vnuaat M Oiwr""1 CW 580OR 111003) YES MAYBE NA 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise X� ]++••Pls? � b. Exposurc of people to sevore noise levels? ,X 7. Light.. and Glare. Will the proposal prOdiice new`T gg t or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in � uBsfantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X g, Natural Resources. Will the proposal resu n: w a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Xr ' b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal i o ve risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, � i pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? �X 11. Population. Will the proposal alter 'hd location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect ex sting hodsln�, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation Circulation. Will t ie proposal result in: j a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? X -2G- .OPw•WA• SgltiMilAftQN tH1lti'f FOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE UGULATIONS YWTM 1'MI 5-KNITARY OF STATE YES MAYBE NO b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? K c. Substan*!Al impact upon existing transportatif)i, systems? X , d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of f people end/or goods? ,,, e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? to Increase in traffic hazards to .� motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X i4. Publin Services. Will the proposal Five an MR upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: s a. Fire protection? _ X , b. Police protection? $ c. Schools? d. Parke or other recreational facilities? Xr �� f e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energx. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X �. b. Substantial increase in demand ! � upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X I � -25- j i i FOR /ILIND ADMINISTRAYIux RIOULATIONS `IWItH TH1 51CMARY Of STATI (hntiaM N awww "I Code t 0%%11310.1) � MAYBE NO YESMA .� 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result n a, neea for new systems, or j substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? .�. b. Communi.caticno systems? X. e Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm, water drainage? X- f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health,_ Will the proposal resu t in: _ , a. Creation of any health hazard or W potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -X— i b. Exposure of people to potential = health hazards? -�-- 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result 'in t (e nbsfruction of any scenic _ vista or view open to the p>>blic, or y $ will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically i offensive site open to public view? 1 19, Recreation. Will the proposal result 3n a impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational X opportunities? 20. Archeolo icaa Historical. Will the ,proposal resu t n an aTU eration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? �I -26- I i COMMUATICO Age" FOR HUNG ADMINISTRATIVE RNULATWNG WITH TNT 19"JUARY OF MATE (h""*is Qoveerwt coil$Moto«Mal) E NO , I 21. a jigK FindingM of 6i. nificanco. (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a .dish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining lavels, threaten to elimina Lat a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered y plant or animel or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the poten- tial to achieve short-temp to. the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment le one which • ., -occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while x long-term impacts will endure f well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, $ but cuxmulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those Impacts on the environment is significant. ) X d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause substantial adveirse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? I IM DISCUMON OF UVIRONMEMAL EVALUATION 1 i -27- +•r aooA• CONTINUATION SH99T - POR PILINO ADMINISTRATIVE 110LILAT10Nb WITH THI 51CRITARY at STATI t►rnwwl h 0"Ma"t Code 3"der 113MI) TV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agenc;() On the basis of this initial evaluation: L7 I find the proposed project COULD N(1T have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Cl I Find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL HE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect o)) the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is req"ired. Dated ?-a• 198 � '4'� S gna ure h Charles W. ihat.;ptan r For HUJ3 i Bea h Red velo ment Agena-- 3 F O pz l I _ZB_ t i rj Y/9 /• r:J1 flt:� (� REQUEST FO"EGEVELOPMENT A r CY ACTION r "PROVED I. By CITY COUNCIL. RH 89-45 ---- Oahe . ugljst 7 1989 CITY (:LVItk Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redeve opmeni 'eircy Members w 1 J' Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Chief Executive Officer ' Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Developmen Subject: LOAN PROGRAM CAP INCREASE FROM $10,000.00 TO$25,000.001 AI.L OF SOUTH OAKVIEW AREA. i Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ j New Policy o►• Exception i Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments' i STATEMENT OF.15 1 : +a ! An incentive loan program for property owners of Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane received previous approval from the City Council on January 19,1988. The maximum cap for the loans approved was $10,000.00. On July 17, 1989 the City Council considered increasing the loan amount from $10,000.00 to $25,000.00 and amending the boundaries for this loan program to include all of the South Oakview Neighborhocd and continued this matter to the August 7, 1989 City Council meeting. 1 RECOMMENDAT QN: Authorize the Economic Development Department to offer the property owners of South Oakview Project Area the following: 1. Deferred Payment Loan for enclosure of carports or reconstruction to enclosed garages, on-site landscaping to include sod, shrubbery, and irrigation systems, and fencing for all of South Oakvlew Project Area. This loan Is payable in full plus a one time 6% interest fee when the property is sold or title transferred to other than the owner of record with a maximum loan amount of $25,000.00. ANALV51S.,. South Oakview Redevelopment Project Area is defined as the area South of Mandrell Drive, north of Slater Avenue, west of Nichols Street and east of Beach Boulevard. This area would greatly benefit from converting existing carports to four door covered garages, implementation of new landscaping and fencing. The fencing, carport conversion, and landscaping would decrease vandalism, and provide for higher security measures, as well as maintain an enhancement standard set by the Koledo ,,Lane/Jacquelyn Lane Enhancement Projects. � N 1 ►: PIO/s/as r RAA RH89-45 August 7, 1989 Page 2 These upgrades received conceptual approval from the Housing Committee, which consists of three 'Council Members and four Huntington Beach residents. The previous loan program for Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane has been well received and utilized by property owners on these two streets. Staff supports the concept of enclosing carports to garages. Enclosed parking is currently a code requirement for new apartment projects throughout the city and offers added security, higher rental rates, and Is aesthetically more pleasing than open carports. The carports in the South Oakview neighborhood are a blighting influence and need either conversion to enclosed garages or to be rehabilitated as carports (add pitched roof, structural and cosmetic reinforcement of posts and painting) to meet current city standards. If ,approved, the loan program will greatly benefit the south Oakview area particularly Barton Drive, Mandrel Drive, and North Koledo lane. The loans will finance much needed improvements including painting, landscaping, fencing, irrigation, and re-stucco. At the July 17 meeting much of the discussion regarding the loan program focused on the issue of enclosing the carports to garages. However, the loans also include new landscaping, fencing, painting, and re-stucco. if the council Is concerned solely with the garage enclosure issue, the loan program could be altered to offer financing for the above items and rehabilitation of existing carports to remain as open carports pursuant to the alternative action. F• NDING O R Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds budgeted to Housing Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: I. Approve the loan program as presented with the modification that the carports may be rehabilitated but must remain as open carports. 1) Locational Map 7) Rendering of Proposed Improvements 3) Photos of the existing condition ;f Oakview carports will be presented at the August 7, 19$a City Council meeting. 49G3r + DLB/AP,jar I� I+ I+ I I I i I • r SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 26 -- 5 -II "Olt - (:"STY .~..�wlt»r r r n.• O� rFOlfl� .Vrl Il IgO MH .MIIMI•Ml.t.y,1 M 1,•.N 1- a MOM •m Iffg � -.=IOBEACH n.sMMa M.[r wrn�ws�r ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '�' tloom scolsoftm wt IMK .•... • w� � ....11,./.MI{/I.1 MI/.I«I1«N Ir,N1 • I M1• 1 •rr A 0" •o KA NN MI°fl mom"KM�r Ave m1 M az 0P .._.. C4•MS� . N CF-E • SO a Iaq!l�at rt .1 SIAM# .1 Iy J ill MI MI R R2 1 o CF-R w R 2'• R 2 X•R,• U Rf « !ow. ITT MI`m CF-E� MIMI #u I.." Rs RI r I Rb 't1 I 111 1 Al RI 1 C4 .` I as w la•cv r IAOU Rs e 0: k 9 ' a•co co RI•ca a ftti( M - U MI . • MH fa(�o _ MI j --- g I 4 uI C R2 j CF-R MI R3 R2 C4 / ml-Co + i # YI - R2 �M. � pa ml MI j R2 1 J u i ; u 11 ►EMI-CC,, 5.F KCC.? R2 R2 C41 I p age OP on I w( I3 } Conceptual � •, r s South • TEL No .7145839156 Aug 24 ,89 16 :04 No ,005 P.02 _SON 110 CCR11►1CATE 19 Ig A A YATTEa Of M1t'01WA110N ONLY AND CONI'Ll ND IUR1TTt UPON tNC CEL L._,CATE HOLDER.TMII<CiR rA#-ATE DOEI NOT AMEN BISA INSUZt At4CFi SERVICES EriEND OR ALTER THE COYCMOE A�OR!?L0 PY THE INXI EY WtOW. 125 27Ln STRUT j4WAPORT BF101, CA. 92663 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE LETITIER"r A SO�ITTSDAI.F INSURAEVCE COMPANY COMPANY a IN8UnE0 LETTEn ROLSPUY GARCIA,Pris McMurtry, ANI) COMPANY C FRANK MARTINU DRA: OAKVIEW _ 0"UNITY MURAL PROJECT COMPANY • 1726 OAS', STREET LE�tE A � r ESM114GTON MACHO CA. CW0ALETTEn Y E IVA 11 TO CEATWY THAT►OUOMS Of 0WMA1 M LISTED KLOW KAYit UtN ISSUED TO THE INSURE&NAMED ASOYi POR THE POLICY PENOOij4V Ti NOTW(TIOTAAW)M ANY RlOUMEMENT TERM OEO OR COMtOf M OF ANY CI MTRACT OR OTHER OOCUMENT MTTH RES'!CT TO WV14Y'1 TTMOEATIFICATL'Y I o10�;UCHPY 105111/iN.THE Vffi'AATKE AFFOR BY THE PO "ll DEW-1690 MKIN Ill lUWiCT EhW TO ALL THE T ,EXCLUSIONS.AND C01 00 T TYPE OF WSWLWCE POLICY HUMSEA MC NlltiNt AgCr IyWTDY t1AISILITY LIMITS IN TMOUEAI tT a-I rvsaml au I►M9P'rr, S up a &3cn: QiNER,IL W/ItttY �Opar • COWR Kl4f%%tow vuu"r S S PREIttSEfWPEMfl0u5 GLS TO BE DETERMINED n wo TY S S W&t UXL a W1M PAC+aUCTSCCIrJ'LE1EDCvfM114►IS � . "old co $1,SOU, S 1,C i �r1otM11oEIn cvl(1AACTfxa Pi11601k OUM PEAsoom INJURY S • 1►uTo1A4M.E wdMLTrT �+ „' AYr WTv ETA�tvao s �' �'. ALL 000 AWIX(ipV..PASSSSII r AU We WIGS�1TMY./EST.� �� s • MIMED A(JTpS �~i�i.�•�-r .. �' rM10RJlTr At7~AII06 �ri""k 1}7 Ea d�n � OAAIAtft s t�utAr�tWrtm 0i1';T���`•'T:�� �� EXCau UAXIUTY P*XLLA WQli •r ,a � COY4MCD g I (MIA TIM WIMLA FOPO4 OT•;I�•r WO141cLRE'CoItPtNEAT16H sTATUTar w AND S (EA:M A:CCE+' EMPtOvtw'lusulTr -�!• S IDIStASE►DtYr . r S IDnf1St ti:N!': FXX PROJECT AT 17201 OAK STREET, flUNTINUMN QEACII# Ew P IuriNG OF A MVML. DESCArPtlO1f OF OPEfIAT10NSrLOCATpNSNCtI LES4iPECIAL ITE!OS THE CITY OF HVIrINGWIN BEACH, CALIE'M41A► THEIR AC OFFICERS, SERVANTS. AND EMPLOYEES ARE MADE ADDIPIWAL INSi1RP.D, SVr ONLY INSOFAR AS THE OPERATIONS LRVDER THIS CONTRACT ARE CalclERENE D. THE CITY OF HUNTINMI BEACH SHOULD ANY Of THE ABOYE DISMICO rOLICIIS H CANCELLED ItU�QAE TN 200 MAIN STREETPIRATLDN DATE TMERCOF, T1ff ISSUINO COMPANY WILL i�N"AM`x YLAII 0 DAYS WAITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTKICATE HOLOE ED 10 )X"l rlNG'S'' J BEACH, CALIF. 92648 ttrr.OUDOLIM?m KbV0WWW x � Ilxler AV ZU)otEPx�ESENIATIV .K , REQUEST Mf . aEDEVELOPMENT Ao )ENCY ACTION RH 89-45 -eb Date July 17, 1999 Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Submitted to: Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Chief Executive Officer��-P- Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Develop .A Prepared by: 1, LOAN PROGRAM CAP INCREASE FROM$10,000.00 TO$25.000.00 IN Subject: ALL OF SOUTH OAKYIEWW AREA. Consistent with Council Policy? K 'Yes [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: ] S'ATEMENT OF ISSUE: An incentive loan program for property owners of Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane received previous approval 1.am the City Council on January 19,1988. The maximum cap for the loans appr,:ved was $10,000.00. 9ECQMMFN12ATI!QN< 11r{ Authorize the Economic Development Department to offer the property owners of South Oakview Project Area the following: 1. Deferred Payment Loan for enclost:re of carports or reconstruction to enclosed garages, on-site landscaping to include sod, shrubbery, and irrigation syc-'ems, and , fencing for all of South Oakview Project Area. This loan is payable in ull plus a one time 6% interest fee when the property is sold or title transferred to other , than the owner of record with a maximum loan amount of$25,000.00. ANALYSIS: South Oakview Redevelopment Project Area is defined as the area South of Mandrell Drive, north of Slater Avenue, west of Nichols Street and east of Beach Boulevard. This area would greatly benefit from converting existing carports to four door covered garages, implementation of new landscaping and fencing. The fencing, carport conversion, and landscaping would decrease vandalism, and provide for higher security measures, as well as maintain an enhancement standard set by the Koledo Lane/Jacquelyn Lane Enhancement Projects. These upgrades received conceptual approval from the Housing Committee, which E consists of three Council Members and four Huntington Beach residents. The previous I loan program for Jacquelyn and Queens .Lane has been well received and utilized by property owners on these two streets. i FUNDINQ SOURCE: Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds budgeted to Housing Rehabilitation.. 1 PIC-•/85 t R.AA RH 89-45 July 17, 1;S9 Page 2 ALURNAEVE ACIIQN Do not approve the recommended loan program and continue to offer the existing loans. Attacbm_e_nw. 1) Locational Map 2) Rendering of Proposed Improvements 4963r DLB/AP:jar i• i � II I, i 1 I 'LANNING• ZONING ,•�., �� I I SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 26 -- 5 -- II l,oTc CITE OF M r11-"•M4..-t N M t.•.1- an CWMaL 9ROMI►111L UR TO -•LEGENMENa�. rrn yan wT r..y J-i 2 � rfsnw.wsrnr.w..sr HIJN'I'INGTQN BEACH ._:.. ��.M:. " r �.......�.r..�,.�t......,�, (:�+ w�j .wIM.wKMob" 7 T L y? A= �MLiw4 wa wtSw ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA III FCvi .r A� I'j p 01311. wwov olmwftft" 41•. 9 s..M.+tr rKu.t/wes�•.rw:ft+..st ' .'. -"....� .:.. {gj] . is =• ........ ,r!. W..w7.F. I .M Afi MK l" W. " u"."Iwo r w f '.• AVE R2 OP ASI a C4•MS f.. w R 2 • I •- ' CF-E , - cW cv ml MI 1 R 2- R213. ., i CF-R i • w1 t II MI R2- R2 1 I shm D _ , R� p CF-E" 3 R .�.. PETTY ,3 MI-M t:e.rt-s-"I _ zi } �I MI MI Rb 113 !4 s a � 2 C4 , MI I rl al I .c n r,w i;3 n Iti tP•r.. �• Rh CD RI•CD R w Ir it a Po-CD ►-cD ri1•CD 9R w M •314 D o � MI MH MI C •D p 8 Ft cr MI sR M( R3 CF—Ft ORZ nz Ml-CD S 1 � o ; n.Y MI RR2 o. j MI T i A � kM'{ A � �I11 t11 •� r ` u ' EMI-CD ` ' 1 u �.. R2 RZ ` C4 I MI-CD 4 MI ? M► ' _ I�_ r� DP_ i OP ►-"' �, .. N • 1 �^ V' •••• �{' txLdEn1 AVE I i � � 1:�, � v t -_�....r....rn'M �fsi�'�4�.:�'�39.y ram:..'-�a'`'' , . s• ... ' �'� � ..J ----_..•.v_ �+„'f_ .-'..,��„� '"✓`may ..1.._-'�f • • • ♦ �. Via:+-•t'1�Ylf�.:.+� ..:�wf pr'.� Ir -47 • t Conceptual plan I, ., .�t..�_ �,lryy .�'J •1.t� ' � �."J'N ..1i F rl{l'a�c South elevation CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NMI MOM Mtn f, TO Paul E. Cook From Douglas N. La Belle I City Administrator Deputy City Administrator/ I Date Economic Development Subject E LOAN PROGRAM FOR CARPORT July 10, 1999 CONVERSION TO E 4CLOSED GARAGES WiT W OAKVICW PROJECT AREA At our recent Agenda Review Meeting the topic of the benefits of garages over carports was raised and I would like to address the issue as follows: P tiYs ImRas� l' L This positive impact of this type of conversion was accomplished on , Commodore Circle which resulted in a decrease in drug sales and car vandalism. Also, vagrancy in and around the carports, which was a problem was eliminated entirely from the project. 2. The construction of enclosed garages is aesthetically enhancing to this area and will be a source of pride to the onwners and tenants in the j Oakview area. 1 Petentigj Negjtive 1=gJ 1. The two potential negative impacts of the conversion include renting ate enclosed space as a dwelling unit or the space being used as storage area. The potential negative impacts can be mitigated through the restrictions placed on the Individual loan recipient. The owner will sign an agreement form which will outline the ' use restrictions. If a continuing violation is found, the loan may be due and payable in full } if the violation is not corrected within 30 days. This should serve as a deterrent to using { the garages for anything other than their inte►ided use. Therefore, I support the concept of the city financing this project to include a complete I conversion from carports to enclosed garages. The risk involved in this typpee of parking is no greater than any other single--family or multi--family project currently being coast:acted in the city and arguably less risky In light of the restrictiomi placed on the loan recipient. 3JLB/EN:jar• S393r /�6 �[1iecu f: REQUEST . R RE�7 DEL AGENCY ACTION i1Y CITY COUNGi►. RH 88�-10 i�yll February 22, 1988 r Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, E;;ecutive Director �,L, i Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Community Develop OAKVIEW PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS OF PENDING PROJECTS Subject: Consistent with Council Policy? K) Yes ( J New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Ati.elysis, Funding Source, Alternative Aztions,Attachments: 1. �14} E ISSUE• The Department of Community Development has recently completed an analysis of the land use, public improvement, and circulation for the Oakview Neighborhood based on a report prepared by the city's planning consultants, POD, Inc. Staff's analysis of POD's recommendations are included within this report. RECOMMENI ATM: 1.Approve in concept the follow*ag projects and direct staff to prepare plans and specifications for: ia} Alley reconstruction in south Oakview b) Jacquelyn Lane Enhancement Project c) Street lighting in north Oakview 2) Include In the FY 88/89 budget, an implementation schedule and funding sources for the retraining staff recnmtnended projects. ANALYSIS: The Oakview Neighborhood is bounded by Slater Avenue, Nichols Street, Warner Avenue, and Beach Boulevard. The neighborhood is currently a mixed use area. with commercial and older residential developments dominating the northern half, and medium—high density residential in the southern half. Also Included in the neighborhood a!a two small parks, an elementary school, a Community center. and F. day care crtfter. The Oakview Neighburhood has a diverse ethnic composition of vietr:,satese, hispanic, and white. The averege household income for the area is 80% of the county's median household income. Based on this average income, the neighborhood has been identified as a neighborhood enhancement target area. Lander this designation, the city can utilize Community Development Block Grant funds to accomplish its Community Development objectives. PIo/1/85 ('t The Oakview area is also a redevelopment project area whi�:h benefits financially from new development which contribute by increasing the tax base, thus producing "tax Increment." By combining these two funding sources, new community development projects can be undertaken to improve the circulation, Streets, alleys, landscaping, and housing conditions with the neighborhood. This analysis presents several projects which can be Implemented by staff to achieve a successful neighborhood improvement plan for the Oakvlew neighborhood. Following is a list of projects which would contribute to the improvement of the Oakview neighborhood. They are listed in order of complexity with the least complex projects listed first and the progressively more difficult projects follow. It is the staff's recommendation that the projects be implemented in the order listed below as funding is available. 1) Alley reconstruction in south Oakview 2) Precise street alignment plan 3) Jacquelyn Lane Enhancement Project 4) Street lighting in northern Oakview S) Elm and Keelson cul-de-sac development f) Barton Street extension 7) Mandrell and Kristin connection Other Projects: S) Zoning Analysis of POD Study 9) Housing Rental Rehabilitation Program The following analyzes the identified projects and includes a project description, estimated cost, and contribution to the Oakview neighborhood. 1) Alley recQn5ituction In Sout OalvLe - The alley reconstruction (� project would include the alleys adjacent to Jacquelyn Lane, Queens I Lane, Keelson Lane, Mandrel] Drive, and Barton Drive (see attached l maps for locations). This project would bring the alleys into conformance with current standards for alley construction. The current condition of these alleys Is very poor. The high traffic volume and weight of the trash disposal vehicles has deteriorated the existing alleys beyond the point of"spot repair." This project will improve the public right-of-way and enhance the visual quality in the south Oakview Neighborhood. The total estimated cost for this project is $170,000. I 2) p„cist Street Aligner at Plan - The precise :street alignment plan � will Include the follvviing alterations to the existing circulation plan:* a) Cul-de-lacing of Elm Street 1� b) Cul-de-sacing of Keelson Street c) Connection of Kristin Circle to Mandrell Drive i d) Extension of Barton Drive to Nicholz Strut s e) Connection of Jacquelyn Lane with Barton Drive extension *See Attached Map lope i/, i 3) Jacauelm Line Enhancelnent ProleCA--This project would enhance the visual quality of Jacquelyn Lane and subsequently Queens Lane. This project will improve the landscaping and streetscape for the two streets neighboring Koledo Lane. Jacquelyn Lane was chosen over Queens Lane for priority implementation based on a willingness of owners to participate in the project. This project will include reconstruction of the sidewalks adjacent to the curbing, removal of existing parkway trees and replacement with an evergreen tree with a less destructive root system, new retaining walls, landscaping with drout resistant shrubbery at parkway, (see attached draft plan). The estimated cost for this project to include Jacquelyn Lane from Slater Avenue to the alley adjacent to the Day Care Center is $113,656. } 4) Street lighting in north_Oak - The Public Works Department reports that 36 street lights are needed In the northern section of Oakview if existing lights on wood poles are converted to marbelite pole.i. Thia project would increase the lighting for the north Oakview area and would meet the current standards for street lighting in the city. The estimated cost for 36 street lights is $36,000. 5) South Elm Street Cul=dr,-sac. Keelson Cul-de-sp -Currently Elm Street ends at a juncture with Keelson Lane. To properly cul-de-sac these streets, the city would acquire the right of ways of the affected properties, acquire and abandon the existing water well an Elm Street, as well as hook-up affected water users to the city's system. This would allow for a turnaround, sidewalk, curb and gutter. The estimated cost for this project is $120,OO1). 6) Barton Street Extension-This project would extend Marton Street to Nichols thus allowing better access to a designated collector street. This entry to south and north Oakview will eliminate much of the through traffic experienced on the south Oakview alleys. This project includes the acquisition z nd demolition or relocation of one fourlilex unit, acquisition of land right of way from the Ocean View School District, and the improvement of Barton Drive and a portion of Jacquelyn Lane. The following is a breakdown of the s anticipated costs for this project. Four Plex 1 Q $ 000,350 350 000 $ Dwelling (A & D) Land/R.O.W. 57,920 sq.ft. 1,158,400 f Q $20./sq.ft. { Barton Improvement 750 linear ft. 105,000 i Q $140./linear ft. I , Jacquelyn Improvement 120 linear ft. 16,800 @ $140./linear ft. Landscaping/Irrigation 11,600 Fq.ft. 23,200 (street frontage) @ $2.00/sq.ft. Water& Sewer Line 400 linear ft. 2=9- SUBTOTAL $1,673,400 25% CONTINGENCY 419,350 TOTAL $2,091,750 Land'Va?!» Recapture 2 lots @ $100,000 $200,000 7) Mpdrell--:In, In Co ectInn -ThIs project would create better Interior circulation within the residential area of south Oakview. This project includes the acquisition of one four-plex unit, demolition or relocation of the unit, and installation of street improvements. The following is a breakdown of the anticipated costs for this project: Four-Plex 1 @ $350,000 $350,000 (,possible relocation cost of $5,000/unit totaling $20,000) Street Improvement I10 linear ft. 15,400 @ $140./1inear ft. Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter 220 linear ft. 2,200 @ $10./linear ft. Landscaping/Irrigation 1,320 sq.ft. 2,640 @ "F*7.00/sq.ft. 1 E SUBTOTAL $370,240 25% CONTINGENCY 92,560 TOTAL $462,800 8) Zgnlne Analysi of PQ17 Study- The POD Study proposed some minor } changes In zoning and land use designation for the study area, figure i 7 Indicates existing zoning. Changes were proposed in the northern half for the area. Specifically, POD recommended that In order to encourage consolidation of lots, a consolidation bonus be granted for parcals of 20,000 sq.ft. greater. Such consolidation would permit an i Increase In density from the present R2 (14 units per acre) to 113-20 (20 units per acre). This bonus would apply to the area indicated in Figure 7. 1 ' Second, POD recommended that two blocks (see Figure 7)be redesignated from R2 and R5 to a 113-25 (25 units per acre). This redesignation was intended to do three things: 1) reflect a more acceptable use for the block fronting on Warner Avenue; (change from office professional to medium high density residential), 2) encourage recycling of older use, and 3) provide a transitional buffer adjacent to Charter Centre. Staff has reviewed the POD land use proposals and feels that they are moderate and reasonable actions. It should be pointed out, however, that such changes (particularly the two blocks proposed for PS-25) may not be absolutely necessary in order to achieve timely recycling ( � of properties. .Staff has recently received private proposals for office development on the R5 parcel, fronting on Warner Avenue. Staff's principal reservations with office development on this site is ! that it would not result in consolidation of the entire block. An R3 j (or entirely RS)designation on the entire block could encourage the construction of one large development. Within the second block proposed for 113-25, there have recently been several development constructed as per the existing R2 zoning. This trend may continue, thereby achieving the goal of recycling but not resulting in a i transitional u.se adjacent to Charter Centre. f 9) jigusingLaen,till Rehabilitation Pro am--The Rehabilitation Program has been operating in the Oakvlew Neighborhood over the}past four years. The rental rehabilitation prugram utilized CDBG funding as well as a separate rental rehabilitation grant. The achievcments of this program can be seen on Koledo bane and Jacquelyn Lene. The city staff plans on continuing this program as funding is available. An average of forty(40) dwelling units are iehabilitaed annually within the Oakvlew Neighborhood. Th- funding level is approximately $250,000 annu�.11y. I The funding sources for the identified projects will include CDBG; funds previously i appropriated to the Oakvlew project area ($409,000) and tax increment funds as they , i become available. Funding will also be made available for identified projects from future years CDBG funding en a year-to-year basis. Projects 1-5 can be accomplished with existing CDBG funding and project 6 can be financed p4rtially by 1988/89 CDBG funding. The project 6 (Barton Street extension) shore-d be considered a inulti-year project. The first year would Include acquisition of the four-plea, relocation of tenants, and demolition or relocation of building. The second year would Include negotiation and purchase of right-of-way from the school district. The third year would include the construct ion of the improvements. The same multi-year funding process would apply to project number 7 (Mandrell and Kristin connection). Project 8 requires no funding. Project 9 is funded yearly through CDBG funding and rental rehabilitation grant funds. 4' t ALI iVE_A=N: i Direct staff to review alternative improvement projects within the Oakview Project Area. A 1AMMENTS: i 1) Map of Street and Circulation Improvements 2) Maps of Alley Improvements 3) Current Zoning Map(POD) 4) Jacquel)m Lane Enhancement Project i PEC/C i.r3/EN:lp 3567h I I I i I' `I it I I � • I OARVIEW Street and circulation imerovements Warner. Avenue Sycamore Ave. a LB w elsito p Cypress Lve. Cypress Ave. 4J M E •o i ► n � O fA .>1 <ristin Dr .. Us c o m b n D r. �►� c c c >1 i Wagon Dr.' Ll i Slater Avenue i LEGEND i Existing street Proposed Improvement -- -- -- 7 ' -n 0 !((L��1t11tt—�ill}i ry�, ..; T{ Q= � DD rn � ��; f1;R';L�D�Ci'CYD•D• :�• ; i c cz+a c>: ac 00 T D{D�Dti..t1 ID • [ +n� 7� Q • c Q is �LZ a Q f is?cam C ll�Lt�� •---' �.`• � acaara oloc c I Q Q r- �J Cc � � C kL�L",Gir�Qi� Ca j _ .D ro I t rr- ;p . . - I j ' 22 _ fs aer a eNE ` 23 '. • ~ --J ►r�7C.Y • ALL Er t.h! 13 to !B 19 ; 1 ,s ..•�l, ED �4! : ON17 :«... ,.s:r :.r:t".rccrrx: :��' • N?4091 � _ �• _ O.fR r71�riIK:MTi*f SCN�OL '' :R r � J ! ..•�+ AAA V•C+r SCHOOL ri+fX - ^ 31), 30 • 24 ; 2B ti J 26 } t = DluRrview CIRCLE 2 31• S� 35 3G O 2 2 2 yr III .4�I'! 1•ri.'f '•i: ':I -. tiJ N r�ti - !C', ,:;;{.L! itrcrrr E At A.' .Tr! - Sr-, •:Cr lotwo Emil :.�� .tom y fig �_ •:�-�:i..�:h; .?r•'y:tee•-.-.`w_y ter:� -ti.<.. :�. _>-;.` �s. -+r.....��• .��r+._ .i;AvY.ec.••. ;1•.��.; •�• •t. - �-tr �t`r;�'�c ,►�?f.:y.".�--�_....._ -r�.�'s.=j.t/C•St.list r J�!/'a,SEC_,�ti i.�.S f3:t 1.13t; ..� :t.-:... .�•,: -_;' ... ,�� .,�,�.tea zf •'i,si �� ., �.�`:'.�•Yf r'.",.J•v, -e.f:- ���:;s �.;�•.�•�r w.fa+t �r• ' ;Ct t�' ?1�1�:. .,w .. ,�� I��sr. ' ..a ��.�:r��sr�J�+S-+,t. ��,��.•��}^,�'-»Tf�.,Yr,:i :.:•i/�i��:wi: '�`-�•.L_'•'j.�' i� - •• •� :1r��1'^''''IC�a-4�•i.�A,,ti"r'•jS%`'f'��.i:i7:..Yr.�t:� 7t••.�y..•�.:T.Lr...!y J �•,+Lt ., ..=a.•, 'r.. .T �r��J?7:� J _ � s • � �_ 1 '.__� � It •' . 22 ♦t:fr : s r••aft .sr.h zt , T L rR ..: 13 � ',+.a... �►• . TRACT.. 3 t ..... `s ��f�•r/ J t Jf f7•!! Onti: V • »� K +;. .� . JC �`;' " 1 t�^�,� � 1 e• If Q -;rr.�•rar;i� ,r T IE r .A Urr k 8 � r • ,. t .. c � i rJs.r. p - a at+. .•Kk: :•�• •� .i 15 �•. .i - ,L: 'f =e1-::` 1S .s a fli+r f•�• ` t• j-. f ..i• i •!'f_•. '��v.�:'i�;:+y �:..•M ZG a'r ��� I• - �Q iT'ia. - '- 7''O.. ' ®•1'i�•it wtr��Lti•%- •� .r L• J •'1 .Y'�ia.. .• S wl. i , •aat'r N.: sw . Y 14 NCI': �Fl+.ir`./f".�aaar�l.fI��'�•�':• .t �r='�tKN(.f:.t3�•.�••�.�' ��. � . . `•-�,1•ll.:Zf�T�, - '. r .n �• 'r,n f• eJ r! .a - l . .a e7 wN Y t ! rs�. .yl �♦ ' ,1�: e .� ,a.•.. � �' =L✓��� •r �., O •�• its r •' ' �,��i:r � 3 �t0 �1 ,`2 C:s , {� 11 O Ls — 1T }r' O 0 `•� IC V ' a h'fs 4.3,7/ ; �,• " � t.'O til53 /di-y✓J57L,`• ti "..• - SLTIiCF} AVENU£ fTrls•1•rr T _-,- '4-:_, A'Af 1:. ,i,I,J r.. . tSiFS:?f+'S i.�(]Cr• G AssLSsOA's ut:Q 7�.:T !': 4�. , J.'A' --•�', r�r:±t rt�tTbfS: ba x l[5 �f 2: A'A' t : 'L,7 CIrl:LiS 7�- �- - _ _. — _ -_ -wv •�'-.6�+r.�Y_w`a'e.i'C�•S,.-tt•7'�j�lw�•,..•��:'.�'q�.•TC':+.I.)3S•1r1. ��...�.�^��•^'�••.. w• ......�. .`i•.. ••\yI'�.)wS• .. .• ♦ ,• �i^«•••.'� •V: ��� . .t: ;ice�r.�r.►�'h.•'3.: ZI[i,. ..r. .. ... . • r :•.i I i I Me 28 A�4m.st c:f•?-rr +o ssTRdCT o ra t, tt r, - .. J. .r - r.... ;: �; !J.' �� �j.r 1:41� /!.' �� •� .r ' a �, (5 �►.�. L i :.• •i-.;. ti i tr s_'ir"Y'i' te r. .t. � 3,var L N '� r• l s. . 1 � t =£�_ GRJvC•: , �t=J ' r^:5T.'! C:Ra'[E : 1 �' �' I t• •t,+ Y �f 11 ,t••• 'r� • �►i`-•=.=r.Y�• i�� :f:. `d• ;5�{+�,,Vµ.i I• .r s t04 ' • O 'a. ... .j -s•• �* r. � . i.r J ' ' .- _- .,1..is n 11 •1TS! U�ffi4t 's..i3"' '.—: :...�::� 1-:••.ii Sn r ,,��•• O L..;?ice r�:kc J .i � '� � � �• J11.1- .' - sCawr to•�''... AOA- 'T /.f/L• �fa.�) kt'L• A$!«=S iK . GLOC., 9 '. � s%'"''-JCL n�L•RLFS P•3G!I£�i FAGC 2� Srr,rt't: m tjACLC$ ' \ COUsCr Or cFct.CF I i 1 141 ors 71 {�-'--� 11f7 � 1, 1 [TERI � it I , I i• I I �] i ! i i F r .v L � ~+N�~ r� v�✓wrwr r.� r.w.Mbrr./NwM r�l Ir 7 � rn•a: .+Mer, a.tw.e+�.r;n.r,-'� ,-..,......,t R.w►N..7�...,f i•r♦ � r o ' '/ /MYr.� ♦ UIL ,, - t �r�r-:c • �fi{3QISir i=• ^!ff� -__ I.��\Y.n. � mar �. �W�,1 � � ,;• Tf IlL.�L �..�_!'i •-+L- —+ 4+�R• 4'Mlwb rf yw/.a --___- I wr Y•r-� r i �ti+ � t j • n•--Av✓r 1A•M ]�►_ly�i�.�� • 1•SLY REQUEb f FOR CITY OUNCkACTION °r RH 88-34 t Date Tune 2A982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator ' - � ;1 Prepared by: Douglas N. La - Administrator Deputy City Administr for/Community Developnien 1 Chief G. L. i'ayne, Chief of Police �.. pR >3vo Dj,► CITY C�attNtllt. Subject: ESTABLISHMENT OF OAKVIEW SERVICES PROJECT f� I Consistent with Council Policy? (+C] Yes New Policy or Excllpti Qrx.r Statement of irsue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF IS.SUE: Residents as well as the Oakview Task Force have requested additional public services be placed in the Oakview Neighborhood. These services would be for the summer months of July 1, 1988 through October 1, 1988 and include the funding of two positions: 1. Youth Counselor. 2. Police Officer. The Housing and Redevelopment Staff has identified existing funding sources under the 1987-88 Community Development Block Grant Program (Local Option) to finance these two positions. RECOMMENDATIQN: 1. Authorize the transfer of$30,000 from Account No. 894867 Local Option, to new account-Oakview Services Project -new number to be assigned. 2. Utilize the $30,000 to finance two positions to include: one Police Officer and Youth Councilor, for a limited term from July 1, 1988 to October 1, 1988. ANALYSIS: f The Oakview Redevelopment Project Area is currently progressing with three public Improvements projects, i.e., Jacquelyn Lane Enhancement Project, alley reconstruction In south Oakview, and additional street lighting in north Oakview. Along with these improvements to the physical appearance in this neighborhood, it is Important to supply special human services in this area. Currently, Project LOGOS offers a Youth Employment Program in this project area, and the Oakview Center offers many activities for the neighborhood youth. However, a need for further services is recognized in this neighWhood as evidenced by recent gang activity. 'Therefore, a position of Youth CouncUor is recommended to work at the Oakview Center during the summer months from July 1. 1988 to f October 1, 1988. This Counselor would work 40 hours per week with the neighborhood , f youth and assist them In identifying alternatives to gang activity and delinquency. i Plo 5/as RH 88-34 .t ''June 20, 1998 �"� �'► ! Page Two Due to the recent increase in graffiti, gang representation, and destruction of property In the Oakvlew neighborhood, it is also recommended that a sworn officer be placed in the Oakvlew neighborhood during the summer months of July 1, 1988 through October 1, 1988. This officer would establish a working relationship with the neighborhood residents. It is anticipated that this high visibility officer will offer a deterrent to crime in this area. EUNDINQ SOURCE: CDBG Account No. 894867 — Local Option. Total appropriation — $30,000. (a) $18,000 for foot patrol officer, and (b)$12,000 for youth councklor. A,j,LTE NR. ATIVACTION: Do not approve funding for this project as proposed. i. ATTACHMENTS: � None. PEC/DLB/EN:sar 3133r j R • r I i i f y' r i RrEQUEb f FOR CITY COUN67ACTION RH 88-01 ,yb Date 13m,ar__r�19 1 qRS ��� / Submitted to: Honorable !Mayor and City Council ,Members .�r . C � Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Cornmunity Develop n ` cOIL311 Subject: LOAN PROGRAM FOR JACQUELYN LANE AND QUEENS � aY Gt'�Y Gk� 0 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes t I New Policy or Exceptio ctry cU Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative A , ttachments: � STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The OakvIew Redevelopment Project Area has benefited from the recent completion of several projects such as: Charter Center, Koledo Lane Demonstration Project, and Rental Rehabilitation Loans dispersed throughout the project area. An Incentive loan program for property owners of Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane would greatly benefit the South OakvIew Neighborhood, protect the Investment of the Koledo Lane property owners, and maintain an enhancement standard set by the Koledo Lane project. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Housing and Redevelopment Division to offer the property owners of Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane the following: ! 1. Deferred Payment Loan for re-stucco of exterior of building ind garage, enclosure of carports or reconstruction to enclosed garage on Queens Lane, painting of exterior trim, and on-site landscaping to Include sod, shrubbery, and irrigation system. Thls loan Is payable In full plus a one time 6% Interest fee when the property Is sold or title transferred to other than the owner of record. Z. Six percent (6%) loan for all other improvements, Including all repairs necessary to meet the Section 8 Housing Quality Standards. This loan can be amortized for up to 13 years with monthly installment payments. ANALYSIS: The Rental Rehabilitation Program has experienced some success In rehabilitating properties located on Jacquelyn Lane. However, a further incentive program such as a deferred payment loan Is necessary for a substantial improvement to the visual quality of tnese units, as well as those properties located on Queens Lane. These Improvements will precede the strut and public Improvements ;-cntified in the P.O.D. Study for the j Oakview neighborhood. '001 P-1O 5/85 II it RH 88-01 January 19, 1988 Page Two i FUNDING SOURCE: Community Development Block Grant funds currently allocated to OakvIew Improvements and Dousing Rehabilitation Loan Program. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not approve the recommended loan program and continue to offer 10% market rate loans for Jacquelyn Lane and Queens Lane. ATTACHMENTS: None. PEC/DLB/EN::;ar 2320r i' t. i !t i 1 I i l � REQUE,.j T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date ,,,,` Aori1 23, 1987 Submitted to: honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Charles IN. Thompson, City Administrator 'r Prepared by: Robert J. Franz, Chief of Administrative Services j ,�'� Transfer of Two Oakview Redevelopment Properties- to a Re evelo me t Subject: Agency of the City of Huntington Beach p Consistent with Council Policy? [X1 Yes [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysi3, Funding Sourc3,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Statement of Issue: Two properties In the Oakview Redevelopment project area were acquired, with redevelopment funds, for redevelopment purposes. The properties need to be transferred from the City to the Redevelopment Agency so as to be properly disposed of by the the Redevelopment Agency. Recommendation: Approve the processing of these two deeds transferring these properties From the City to the Redevelopment Agency. Analysis: On September 16, 1985, the Council/Agency approved the acquisition of property In the Oakview Redevelopment project area on a willing seller basis. Two properties were acquired; a) AP #165-364-07 on February 21, 1986 for the total amount of $141,3931 and b) AP #165-364-05 on Alareh 4, 1986 for the total amount of $249,559. The escrow should have drawn the deeds to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach instead of the City of Huntington Beach. This request for council action is being submitted In order to correct the error In processing the deed. Funding Source: None Alternative Action: Do not approve the transfer. Attachment: Deeds drawn to effect transfer. 3108j I Plo 6/85 40 ` a ! 1.11•YITs , . 'Uf3C It ;••. .j 00, �•••-. KJ gal lff �. THIS PORTION OF PROJECT AREA IS r ' ' EXEMPT FRMI ACQUISITION BY T EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE ��+•� �� DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES w• o • O .. . . � f•1l� l7 � U r, • v � •fl , � . • �! 1M41 M•f 1�♦ f •�,r (v�n � Q •V+ • ��, r Q i ,�f�,--sr�++�•�'�"r.'A.. :1 1'�,� , d Ell �'• v t u l oil .1 mr— U53H • A I L ITA I I ti 0. • M1111 I•f I J. •. •• ' w • ?%=IXWIMw1IMW!M=Imm/amIRatI maim hnoImIv=1w11t---- • -� j--• 1 OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA s CITY OF HUNTINCTON SM AOH CA gs_as COUNCIL. - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION K n TON 6tx" To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, City Council Members City Administrator Subject OAKVIEW AREA STATUS REPORT Date October 14, 19$5 1 have attached four staff memorandas which are Intended as an overview of the activities presently underway In the Oakvlew area. As you can see, a variety of public and private Improvement programs are-underway, as well as a number of community service program"' are currently in the planning and Implementation stages. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding our continuing,efforts In the Oakview area, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Respectfl• ubmitLid les W. Thompson, City Administrator CWT/DI.B;Ip Attachment i I i Ja #i4 CITY OF HUNTINGTpN BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION wmnNETEN u#,m TO Charles W. Thompson, ... From Douglas N. La Bel e, CIty Administrator Deputy City Admini a Redevelopment Subject Date OAKVIEW AREA STATUS REPbRT October l4, 1995 BACKGROUND: One of the neighborhoods most seriously In need of assistance Is the OakvIew Area which Is bounded by Beach Boulevard, Warner Avenue, Slater Avenue, and Nichols Street. Residents of the area are,predominately low-and-moderate-income, minority households. Minorities (mostly Indochinese and hispanic)comprise approximately 25 percent of the Oakview population compared to a citywide average of 10 percent. The percentage of those families falling below the poverty standard is nearly double that for the rest of the city, as Is the number of female head of households. Unemployment rates are also significantly higher I:1 Cskview. Crime rates in Oakvlew are among the highest in the city. Although the area represents only three percent of the total population, nearly thirteen percent o! all homicides and eight percent of all assaults occur within Its reporting district. The city expends approximately $100,000 a year In police service to Oakview, compared $30,000 for the "average" reporting district. Distinct patterns of development activity serve to delineate the area Into two main subareas. The northern portion can be characterized as predominately older single-family homes In transition to newly constructed multi-family residences. Many of the streets In this area exhibit substantial public Improvement needs. Some development potential has been realized In the construction of Charter*Centre, a . 400,000 square foot commercial and entertainment complex. Gust south of Charter Centre , at Cypress Avenue and Beach Boulevard, the city has been negotiating with current property owners for the acquisition and consolidation of several marginal use sites for the construction of a 6,000 square foot retail/office development. The southern portion of the neighborhood consists primarily of multi-family 4-plexes and apartment buildings In varying stages of deterioration along with numerous abandoned vehicles, vandalized carports and garages. Because of the many unique needs of the Oakvlew area, the city has chosen to target a fair share of.Community Development Block Grant funds for a comprehensive Improvement plan. The activities meet the Federal government's broad national objectives which directly benefit low and moderate Income'persons and eliminate slums or blight. Through the Neighborhood Enhancement Program, the city has established ' goals of: 1) Improving ,the physical appearance of the neighborhood and ensuring Its viability as an attractive, safe, and stable resiifentlal area; and 2) expand the city's economic base by promoting the development of commercial sites In the northern portion of the area and along the Beach Boulevard boundary. PRO3ECT AREA ACTIVITIES: Along these lines, a variety of projects have been implemented including the Koledo Lane Demonstration Project, the Rental Rehabilitation Program, the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program and a Comprehensive Land Use Study and Circulation Analysis. The adoption of the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area has resulted In increased commercial activity, most significantly, Charter Centre. One activity, the Koledo Lane Demonstration Project, calls for the rehabilitation of sixteen 4-plr. !es, construction of new five-car garages, construction of an optional two-bedroom fifth unit, vacation of Koledo Lane for additional open space and the reconstruction of the alleys; in addition, a security service will most likely be installed. While the project represents a substantial financial commit-, sent (nearly $1 million)and a significant investment of staff time, the end result will be a safer, more attractive place for Its residents and the elimination of visual blight for the cit7. Equally important, it Is expected that the Koledo Lane Demonstration Project will stimulate neighboring property owners to upgrade their buildings to the level of Koledo Lane; however, to make this economically feasible for those property owners, some initial ! assistance from the city will be required. ! To date, the offsite physical improvements' contract which included alley construction, carport demolition, grading, landscaping and irrigation system, has reached the { approximate half-way mark with $250,000 being expended from the original contract { amount of S4$8,000. The onsite construction, which includes new five (5)car garages and an additional dwelling unit, has also reached Its half-way mark with expenditures being loaned from CD13G funds exceeding $600,000. One method to assist owners entails rehabilitation assistance provided through city,-sponsored, deferred loans. Funded by HUD, the city's Rental Rehabilitation Loan Programs offer matching, deferred payment loans to property owners of multi-family rental units experiencing substandard conditions. In order to quallfy,•the units must house low and moderate Income, large families. An owner may receive up to $5,000 from the city to correct basic structural deficiencies, including: poor plumbing, i deteriorating rooting materials, and inadequate foundations. To encourage participation in this program and to offset financial burdens accrued through new indebtedness, HUD allows owners to raise rents to market rate. Displacement Is avoided since cacti tenant is provided with a Section 8 certificate or voucher for rental assistance. A Ith the $213,000 appropriated to the city by HUD, a minimum of 40 units can be rehabilitated. In HUD's demonstration program, It was shown that rental rehabilitation can succeed in providing imprdved, affordable housing for low-and-moderate income tenants. Although the Housing Rehabilitation Program is offered in several targeted areas, property owners in the northern section of Oakview have been especially excited by the opportunity to upgrade their aging dwelling units. Using below market rate Interest loans, property owners can finance such improvement as new carpeting, room additions, remodeling, new roofing and new paint. It is IT to retain this program in Oakview so that a v.-tat stock of affordable housing opportunities for law-and-moderate income households will be preserved. When applied on a large-scale effort, rehabilitation is a proven viable tool in stimulating new investment in deteriorating neighborhoods. i I The city has recently entered into a contract with POD, Inc., a planning firm, for the preparation of a Comprehensive Land Use Study and Circulation Analysis for Oakview. The purpose of the study is to identify conceptual land use plans which will address the long-term development patterns and preservation issues. The study considers such concepts as: open space amenities, beautification projects, pudic improvements, and consolidation areas. The final design concept will be a blue print for future activities along with strategies to cope with the varied transitional patterns found in Oakview. Staff and POD, Inc., are reviewing various concepts currently being proposed, and will be recommending a final design and implementation plan for the City Cuuncil's consideration In December. 1, Total CDBG Funds Expended and Encumbered �2 294 .07 I � 2. Projected Rehabilitation Cost: a) 80 Buildings @ $15,000 = $1,2000000 b)40 Parking Structures @ $12,000 = $ 480,000 = $1,680,000.00 DLBICPS:Ip Attachment: Koledo Lane Progress Report prepared by Public 'A orks, dated October 2, 1985 I 1486h I'^EDO LANE PRLITEX~T-M PQRT 111 ,-• CC-667 October 2, 1985 Contractor: H.J.H. %N,—tern Contractors Award Date: December 17, 1985 Contract Ammt: $488,900.00 Start of Work: February 22, 1985 Items of Work Date Started $ Conpleted Carport Demolition February 22, 1985 100% Car. Re wal February 26, 1985 100% water/Surer Laterals Fdxvuy 27, 1985 100% Tree Removals March 03, 1985 100% Water Main Installation Mardi 05, 1985 100% Temporary Paving March 13, 1985 1001 Preepk�zzation of Building Pads April 01, 1985 100% Reoerktruction of Alleys April 08, 1985 85% Retaining Walls April 30, 1985 80l Walks June 17, 1985 50% ` Telephoner Services : June 12, 1985 751 ( Electrical Services •'June 1'11 1985 30% 1 Lighting (material deli%wed) Jura 12, 1985 Cable TV Services Jura 12, 1985 20% Charge Orders OD 1 - Nbruary 27, 1985 26" water mains and fire hydrant to be installed in each alley within the project area for fire protection on new wli.ts $ 36,050.00 CO 2 - Ramval of large pine, and Wing tlao new tree $ 493.00 CO 3 - May 8, 1985 - add quantity of redwood header-along areas %here alley abuts grass or dirt areas. $ 5W.00 CO 4 - May 17, 1985 - Re-grade building pads of laundry room to PC,Olt xZate units construction tr•uction plan and regrade areas for additional temporary parking. Modify building stairways. $ 10,602.00 CO 5 - July 31, 1985 - Revise lawn planting method to hydroseed. $ No cost difference. Ccammenrs: Owners building contractor under construction for new units acid garages. H.J.H. has completed available won,. that can be performed at this tame. Will move back in as building nears acmpletion. JM:ih cc: Al Adams Les Evans JaC.. KU iAv&t" Spencer CC-667 File "Project Re-pc arts" j �Jfl CITV OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH 1 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIO *rrM,cra+aa+ To Charles W. Thompson Fr ax Bowman City Administrator Director, Community Services Subject Oak View Programs Date October 7, 1985 Bill Fowler has compiled the following report on the Oak View programs as they relate to the Oak View Task Force: The Oak View Center staff has been heavily involved with solving some of the problems identified by the Oak View Task Force. At the task forte's first meeting on June 5, 1985, the problems were broken down into three major areas: (1) crime/alcohol related problems; (2) recreational needs/youth employment problems; and (3) housing/landlord problems. The first area - crime/alcohol related problems - has basically been dealt .with, by initiating a police foot patrol in the neighborhood. Investigator Bob Sutherland reported at the J4ne 20 task force y meeting that fifteen arrests, thirty citations and numerous warnings had resulted from the, first three weeks of the foot patrol. The j police task force is an obvious success, as just recently there was a period of seven to eight days with no arrests or citations. Oak View Center staff, with the cooperation of the police department drew up a flyer outlining many of the penal and health and safety codes. These were distributed to residents of the community. The drinking and trash'„problems, particularly at the school grounds on Sundays, were becoming increasingly worse. The Oak View staff now puts - out additional trash cans with new liners and the soccer group has made a• better effort to discard their trash. The cans are emptied at*:the •ciose�of shift.-by'-center` staff: The foot patrol has had .some - success:, in alleviating_ the drinking problems on the weekend also. T1ie Pu6lfr. Information Office, with the assistance of Bill Fowler, Oak View Center Coordinator Dave Dominguez, and the Police Depart- ment staff are currently putting together a film using a police officer. as the main spokesperson. The film will be emphasizing the`importance of Neighborhood Watch procedures for reporting suspicious' activity, and going into the reasons why crimes need to be reported. It is hoped this will be ready for viewing by the Neighborhood Watch group and,other interested community members by the':end' of October. In June, Oak View Center children were .` part of. a• video taping of the.police crime prevention program "Now to Be a Crimestopper." The second area of concern was doing a better job of meeting the recreational needs of youth in the neighborhood and providing employ-- ment 'opportunities for them. First, a professional intern, Danielle Madison, was hired and placed at the Oak View Center to start e = youth employment program. She started the program on September 3 Oak View Programs October 7, 1985 Page Two with eight youth. Currently, there are twelve teens involved wtih a maximum of fifteen expected in the program. They participate in vocational training and job interview techniques besides their regular duties of cleaning the neighborhood, minor maintenance and some painting. Ms Madison has worked closely with Dave Dominguez to make this program a huge success. The program is expected to run through June, 1986. ; i To meet the increased demand for recreation and realizing that recreational activities can be a constructive alternative for the youth in the area, the center has hired additional temporary recreation aides who have skills in certain areas, such as, cheerleading, gymnastics and "stretch and tone." These classes have been a tremendous success with over a hundred children and teens participating. Also, the Boys and Girls Club of Huntington Valley has met with center staff to start a more sophisticated arts and crafts class with materials beyond what the center has been able to provide. An instructor will come to the center and run a program two days a week. This is ex- pected to beg!n soon, along with a traveling volleyball and soccer league. The Boys Club would provide transportation so that teams from the center could play teams from the Boys Club. Neither area now has enough teams to form a league for itself. Finally, the department will be picking up a 27- passenger bus from the Southern California Distribution Center for Federal Surplus Property this week. The bus will enable the center to provide trans- portation for field trips and special excursions. The last area of concern is the housing/landlord problems. Related to this is a trash problem that the center has dealt with in a. number of ways. A general cleanup program for the neighborhood was undertaken between June 27 and 30. Large trash bins were placed in the area and center staff provided help with disposal of large items, such as, couches, refrigerators, etc. Center staff distributed landowner/tenant rights. brochures*printed in Spanish and English to residents In the community. They also put together ar program for Neighborhood Watch on July 25 which included a representative from the , Orange County Fair Housing Council who reported on housing conditions. Also, a representative from the Orange County Environmental Health Agency gave out information on health standards and reported on a survey done recently In the neighborhood. In closing, I would like to also mention that the center is now taking care of licensing bicycles free for the students at Oak View School. Funds are from the Community Block Grant for the Oak View area. This service saves the children a trip tb the police station. j As can be seen from the above report, there has been tremendous progress _ 1 made by the Oak View Task Force in solving many of the •problems in the community. A large part of this success is due to the efforts of the staff at the Oak View Center.* There is still_.ouch to be done and I'm confident that with the cooperation of the Oak View School, the residents and city staff, the quality of life for the Oak View neighborhood will continue to improve. ; MAIB:BF:cs 1CITV 43F HUNTINGTON BL..ACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION wwrwamr OWN To G. R EXt LIEVrWM From E. Dan; SE mkNT Subiect StMARY OF THE 1985 OAKVIEW Date SFIMTI►MM 25, 1985 TASK FORCE Below are the total statistics for the months of June, July and Aaigust regarding the productivity for the Task Force. The Task Force began on Friday, Jime 14 and ended on Saturday, Aug+ist .il. The officers worked on Friday and Saturday evenings between the hours of 1530 to 0130. A minimum of two officers and a maximum of fair officers were used on each night with vacancies supplemented with Reserve officers whenever possible. The overall accomolishmpnts of the Task Force were as follows: Large getups of minorities congregating in the alleys and streets of Koledo Park were kvpt to a minimum. The crimes usually associated with these large groups were almost non-existent. The usual calls for service in Koledo Park regarding loud music, fights and disturbances in general, declinded significantly. Vandalism, drinking and curfew violations were the major area of concern in Central Park. Numerous citations and arrests were initiated with these concerns in mind. Overall, crimes and problems in Central, Park were eliminated on Friday and Saturday eve,-ings. Complaints of loud music and groups nf minorities congregating and drb*- ing in the alleys and street s were the. maior areas of 'concern in Commodore Circle. Citations and arrests for these violations kept complaints calls to a minimum in this area. There were no noted problems on Commodore Circle during the three months L enforcement. Overall, calls for service in all L r areas were significantly reduced with the presence of the Task Force. efforts of the Task Force resulted in no major disturbances and no major c . -les occurring during the summer mantlus in the areas assigned to the Task , rce. Total Statistics: Arrests - 56 misdemeanor; 6 felony Citations - 271 issued Regular Officer Overtime _ 572 hrs A $22.29/hr = ' 12,750 Reserve Officer raid Time 480 hrs @ $12.00/hr = _9 Officers Special Assignment During .1..40 hrs @ $14.86/hr = 32. Regular Duty Time -�- IiOTAL COST. $M2,076 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1NTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �na,7wc:ar u�a+ r To Rich Barnard From In Reecj,� - Assistant to tity Adn inbtrator Public fo ation fficer Subject OAKNUW NEIGI113011HOOT)WATCH pate October 3, 1955 j I As of October 3, 1985 the video+unit has been involved with the Oakiiew Neighbor. hood Watch Video Project to the folluwing extent. Greg Furlong has attended 2 meetings of the special committee. A video script has been fully prepared by Dianne Drucker and reviewed and authorized as being;the final script by the committee The video unit has fnaly prepared the shooting script and is at present awaiting the completion of the Spanish translation by the Spanish speaking police officer before beginning 1woduction on the shooting script. The officer has informed Suzie Wajda that hr will be finished with translating the Fn&Wh version of the written script by Thursday,Oct.17. Once the translation is completed the video unit will then begirt production the week- of October 210 through Oct.25th. If no complications arise the production will be completed . . by Nov. let. The vi3ro tape editing process will tr1;e approximately 1 to 2 reeks to complete, therefore the estimated C-ne of the projects completinn in full will be I'riday Nov. 15th. { i tN Ttth '---� Superior Court OF 7719 STA'I'!•;QF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK ftEi EST FOR RELEASE nF fl►t+'US i. . l�tcna rot�at+cttr «otters,.wueart+ulas.;�, � _• �p titRKit1M1't�M�ItQI1�At#I�INIi9l.J�Itri'ttYM StAtrofCalifu[nia I lkYr'l1t01VUaVTlt4//r1tlJtikIIT�OrtlMllNitTlYt381i1 . '�S Countyn s fOrange )" • GgKRwatistt B r'�>DtltttOMOse4lttMetY , lkr�ii t l!<UN RITA J. RICHTER nut t That i am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of tbNJ till ef31A7"kV Is fir+0Ul9•illi mW.l$i •tw�urywa d tree.oti.,r to j+ra�s�l's.anus r y niro tt da t71P of the United States,over the age of twenty-one years.Arad that I Rvabywwwitey am not a party to,not interested H the a1mve entitled matter, ttesrebyartD+enalrel.lMlt.tloCle7d 6abiifr tlrtlt that I am the principal clerk of tha printer of the tt FYu� Q.,joys"4 d d W4't L 0& 7Sttt l d 1M Hirifrl+xy Ceaya+wk su)w ao toar.w r Dr►tbe�.+l Ace r<tR/tll. Huntington Beach Ind. Review � ttieri2.kr brtar.t lus,rt er�rs.d+a!r.*rrtr sswt ii ibi+Irkslt+r"WAR-, bond tw thepWkk—d amseums weawdntl pMi 6k b SIN saWd. e newspaper ulg�nrn+l circulation,publisheJ in the City of lorstsrarwlMaadYrst+siraojor SWAMikdm%;'dhb► tlwwlttw Ord ttinM t'�'.= , Y w arse 1Y st tirseb lhit d Kric4 Dxwt Huntington Bench OWA- +�10"At rwltfs►aWlfrrN.ifieiMw+sK�r�isradwrtrlerirz, j County of Orange end which newsl+alrer is publish«-d for the M Win otvam* ltrM s"°'"t�►�rM�e�t1Jworl go�.>�rrtNrd.+Awt+iwttpri 41 diseminalion of local news and intelligence of n renerat charac- �aae+fr seu rtrelal ltaab'wll t,e11 ter. and which newspaper at all tin+et herein mentioned had t l�tga p'" ats+�rt reYrNnlowtyrMww�tJt y and still has a tx,na ride suhscriptioa li.t of paying suhacriberl'. 7bntuawAawrcbtteir"04trMt�ts and which newspaper his keen eatablishrd,printed and pub• tart+rtitrkmkmkkbaMtbtwniwilset�pitl IuhPd at regular intervals in the chid County of Orange tilt a Ao1~w"`r"'l4�" "'bTMM+ :+sntlrorlsl�lrsrsKlYMwt w«bees biwerswt tseariw will M trail.TM wIi1M■tt i ae► periml rsrreding one year. that the notire, of which the s"dow,row 0,14,or coal,�I'W"we b w�a Annexed is a printed copy,has M-en publi.hrd in the regular ad �r sisrtriirrNifiWNCWMNi on, ot"UtlowOGLW And entire issue of said ncwspr,prr,and not in any+.upplrmrnt J1aPirfnw,ylRp4r� _... ��__, ,x thereof.nnthe following dates,lei wit: �K+w►�ICA;Off: '� w,me rerhr of forsal . str t�wsl+do mmum 4 sat O AM"ts- sa wlabwl re,i.1e„araNW t1w4i M w 16 It W dm Niws and+i s.alsb4 t a►t+sbdc srarelatwas 1 aorlwi tt+r rry�r!It W 1rY ANsr . t.r..srtls►awdlf7PsawtioMt��aa., , Norw" qiryr4rdrWfwjeerM�rsbwlr,Ist�iiMlri%ri► November 15, 1984 an tatted M t++lu++rRtts rrnrwat t: awterwtt rl1 ie r.arir d st IIOD tttw titrsst s a bAws Disler+4 Ix L At V tsrr eartwsw' r«ylrtd rill Ie fty4 wM:vd lbs my d tt+srl w at rgwei i~ ««lure at r dmt 1lande a tabs sap rr+is.era V.ire+Li Mikes t.lw is 1tt10s rra+.y tuQrrrisr+ier+tr hs taco Aa1► a�rlxteolrltrorlrm .. . I crrtit (sir drel:+tpt under unalt� of,er��h thlt the forego. TM City ofHwa++epsabatirtilnss��sNdw dsniyeilywrili Y t 1 + heir,'Oh"k&um NUD mir Tab 1 et tar lrll'lis City st ing is truz nod.orrrct. -tiM�bw "tih ft tWtUp&be+ris pq d t."WI s a"ad Owlia Claud at..................Garden Grove. &-0t6%Nodiette.Ktretidera�rsm all •a.Mry •rawr+ibrdtar.b aa.r:+.it MterasW wMw.Waw,.etir w t34 e��is simi aA.st`a tib ', of K r t 9 a+M+w 0 fr California.thiy ..:"Pdayot....`.�Y•t!t........ lu"V rriwitim sdrrthoKdatior unim-M WW 14K }M9l : +!W*Ndmra to hs,�rVmW.t tie«,Laos of dr sw W*MN ofewr+oetwn osy it it it m to d At$Dow st Mrir�� m " R 1t a J. Richter,. sae is tan"NOW bb eh carets«,),tine 41 WW 'ry ............................................ 1*HIM 110t�if aw'�'n's.mieyllr.W qP • g w a,.s:-a r+�dd'e% tWw« ybaMrAiWwtwieri in Yr Si ++:,cure yerxd.ner.+ua for�+r•l�t+^tsdatr�.iiw K . Artdreiora Iarwd h by lsdreal�• ��p��NA rt sir Weir r.r7atJ.is ley yR+et K Uy+raaat�M t p M nl<s.t 2—to Cbm—omw U&Dr^etrat of rteMwal a�VA.DwYgwnt, 2'y001►&UMteartrrrt �a�.Ir,Caetarott10p. 04KIAnestoRt lertbsmiss,«.,Awlaskm%stbrOwlbw0"bd, oil .m.K a errellrerd b Rt:> Nr ebik+ira rwd at now moo tw��t o' °°`.a�'+a�r xvn el,uc tiedi 14ltw.smPt L�.�/lit�f Iii�"...•..� �� /.� ��•/�I IN Ti I F Superior Court arnlr• ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ! In and for the County of Orenge i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK RELEASE OF FUNDS �— aP rMO RZOM lT tort State ofCalifurnie / THE!ItarANsorrt""AND CounlyofOrange )ei •VQflCto►tLMAINGtlrMIMUMlilciM o l7rIILTaNT11LttNV1HOM�lYT• '• .:� ,• R ITA J. R ICHTER arArtoA'ties , ltt.'h'fllVfrloM<t►.6prt•itM1AMY ..� That I am and at all time.+herein ment:oued was a citizen of '•d ttr�M�iM lMiei` Jwa rl.IMt• .: 5 . the UniWStates,liver the age oS twenty-one years,and that i koobvin fork C9111MIL,M" j :r ' ,•r- am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled m•ttter; t1011*1M1 ' • 1 1 ' that 1 am the �rinri :clrr3c of the printer oflhe TO AU.t17TRtlMMI)AOI:NCiMGROUN.ANDFLRSONS. i i i ' Tbrp�rp�ws d"a tbre is to WsntYy tiro yp wstr but nk4d sal m to to ,sls. thsGtrdHuatim�.lra.•A. HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW ptep,abssa►o��It�,t�teLicr�Huattr�pB�c►� vaderr Tid�l d the Hsutisi satl Iaua�kwhrsrwt Act d 1 t?{irw tu,tevl a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of rartEs i�H"datpMhels 1'rojtst t.tl,lsieM 1'se�s tl Is+psswarsa F"jw Z Wadb+gton film"Imprn•+..s,•tt.i HUNTINGTON BEACH rtaHo,.n�R.►.i�it.ts.nt...A.r.�.�.. " ' County or Orange and which newspaper Is published for the 14o4at1.CC*Afwtk+low""no, s +ev swum M, .00s;eo4p44 swo lstrvvwwwe'.,G.pen sea.6 d, 0 ani~.i disen.lnatinn of local news and intelligence of a gentral charac- sap r.psow "u;traftk sirtWnYss ad caewrrhr.+lw 444ssa AW let,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had t Araoi.i4w at Wa wr Asraw nl�cstioo saiva"A,i4isew tow. +zed still has a bona fide subscription list of Ilayinx sub+cribers, drutot.w rdWwwAr�w;n rdvW,1W sod Mbathwrt..usit..• and which newspaper has been estahlished,printed and pub- Propel �"go ectM Co.MWIa rov* :or lotsee+t tw t�dssts d b b )Senor sa s Curwiibr bsrY fished at regular Intervals in the said County r+f Orange fora period exceeding one r pe g year, that the nutior, of which the r HwAirralttah0►swComo).CAWNis annexed is a printed copy,has Ix-en published in the regular . ; , and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement - , thereof,on the following detes,to w•it.- r'roert I As ana tloiah d w'uan"NW.wort d 94Mh HOU10 •OW d MiCkis _ 9uwt,e�athofsl.4+. Yrvjrct 1 5dits d N'unss us,vmg of t'faultvsr/•am of nttrasd tillbt• do r✓ �Rt'1971 Gea+r'i'" ts61 it'IjMrgi'li+u+r 1i June 21, 1984 a��' �+�>•"a .enr:,�AVA,� a•+o P V-0 �'",• �i "p�j �+ M�n.M Mf1. sit p ltJ ,w ltarpvM s!41.y $1NVA wit SINVAObh'><J'V TM OM .. SWWOMM It"AtfYM( P"at W Mw'p°'s'1 Ow•'M'"u• "N-f I0UM VNNVIo I 1 eertif (or declare)under 'WAV3*" °�' %1XYJGI.N3J V'M M y penalty of{�crjury that the forego- s0 rmWw3rzX-it"*A,+stt asriµol{su ing is true and correct. - -PW,f VJ .44 s si Par'Prv.4 woo""11ML io"9 uwa-visa"'+0 Vw%2103 t tare YJ'"MA UM'm°A"'IV Dated at..................GARDEN GROVE... A ki.l�l3'IYll"V IN, 8 3 H cwy t4:a wwmw#a "Y am' •,"YO'Ml+a »e g,� .aa,+q w tra.4�'tpr+i 1. '.. ... + WIS r �'s� Juno L�siiKA,t,YLs9Mft'N V 1 ycsYa ;rPW!tust, I Cali r ia.this ay of.Jun ...19........ MX%irs~tf snt7rdU-U •sewb zut yoot"W 43 "0 ' \ t �cft� '� f.. �.G` eta J. Richter zstl�• 's►1�94 ! f .. ...:................... «,. •...••••.. Mtl'rr.'f:'1t'L r'Q"d w"+a"llro'H't84r+nfl+81 Signature cant ro�tv"oa srw'o p i+49 Awa"J ta>'� is SdSfraflCilA'� Olk''t"06; F X(1.71 3jMKI3 �+testrta +tJ t°54 Y{f10t�1iUYJ14 i! iFvt n iq ls►tx+pwo w 0.66M4 -L""V.)*—a otonlo-,!# '�! V'al"ts1 ti9al s.•�t 1s+4iH a ►tivts"n!' ""-S-ff Ya -Ip" vw►f MtnH 'QI p"+I"Ok . t:lK1 1�'tJHfHK�l7d S.11HI1 UOl"J� ,86,@lClil ..+vKag trv'p.l.s.u.d l s'tL DN8 a4af�"t'!'WR3llyd AN-Aff ns 1MYN txg ti"a-fly. ) ntIVX UDU {i ina+a+dL n 1 Form NO.PCP 92082 i 1NT}IF: Superior Court OFTHY. STATEOF CAI.IFORN1A In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK PROOFnF tot1ftwrA'I'inm RELEASE OF FUNDS ; �I -- Ui rt7i x It"t'ttlT na State ofCalifurnie 1 THCt(LLCWSOIs91 UAND Count COran a )ss' NOTKTOFR7WINGOFNO111"IFICAA7 Y g . U1�tTHE SWrt , RITA J. RICHTER t W�am�Hr aiUMMY { Jeae 21,19N That I am and at all times herein tnentimud was a rhixen of Mats Marl the United.Stales,over the ant of twenty-one years,and that I iuu1dg[ywMaDwLaM erala W441 i 71Itt"AU1 ani nut a poly Gs,nor inrt tcsled in the ulrnve entitled molter; it"AU!11�'tl'Ott'1Tf�AG1S`iClt>�,t:RUU1�i.AND PLttiiOJ�4•• that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Ttu I r tJ this sotia to►a WestdY thrw WPMW but slated atWe.to N .4111ts trl 4he CeY d HuMM�tas Itrsrk I.On N$box JU4 9.IVA,the City Of Haatisstan(left►'" tM UA& f HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEtiY t}Mouse+dtto .edurb.atte�et�+remlHtutarrw. id+rnlrwtae i alder Tito t d the Hwasittt sad Cemeaau>hetdnment Act d 197f IrL 93a9d1 a newspaper of general circulntion,published in the City rf far for 4'G°`i"pro�ru 11vject 1.(>ihtew f'h+►e t)lsipio►rmtsu 11"iret 2.W&AIWaa Street lmpearwesu; NUPJTINGTON BEACH 11"*tatlau►agHetul7iutbatasAwet a t. County of Orange ant which new? a►er is published for the 1Y°kt+l•Wrovar tb'a°�'hd'r_.et'^tri It'rttenvistlp koal Flwrtt,ac.to t 1 p 1 1 arras anr:colstJs4 am 6topscsaesatsta;>lm sp+c'e lsstdetepe ad di+emination of local news and intelligen(a of a reneral charac. .rape bapnnrlssnta usditc.eiraWMw art«rmprabe�ssw ilsprertwueat' ter, and which new'xpoper at all times herein mentioned had , { N'arnt A.mw prt�trt tebaatlas aristasn fn ritptsed raJ- slid still ties a bona rode subscription list of paying subscribers, Basta wWMtVlanwAttatw n rk ,t�+ndw;Utiuud ►batlr.d riltiu• and which newspaper has been established,printed anti pub• t'r+jsetS t'ta.idet'^iste+*`tb'"'+kblat.r Au.rotr.t+tr•I►Ystotxoslde bw interest to mWesu d 1es to to ptcssw.w a Caywdt iasf� libl.td at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a r i period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the , littnt;r�t,ayc,eh U,uwCoaary.C.hlan,;. annexed is a printed trolly, has been published in the regular a .._. pad entire issue of said newspa{roe,and not in any supplement i'r+d 1.Mam� N' bd .metAw",vastdWwbtbairad�d �H thereof,on the following dotes,to wit: titrret.sanbnftilattr.. Pwint i North of W rise Avtaar.. . I. . ' weal d Bosh Bauevsrd.art of railtawf IUM'. dwa ,eusahntVlrhia�tsaCsttstt. Yn*d 2 Sae Area I:TvvnLA Neothhrlrmd ISobsant.+at IDie M sat uw sautb d Geldsw Wtat Street,as r1 1}th%owt.b soloW by Wahrot asd Falls Avnassa.The bars is this sea enrist of bmA baaerWw I1y4r boot$of the IwW vis up-11im an hW atlr W7a1* ety feelbor An a"Ida t�iW Amt IA:Owtorw Nt44Grbnod[�hsat►reso-Uw Y a area(me Jule 21 r 1964 limp w Riffs earth d Mtesu Av$aw bisavird by Abbe"8ttw ad Nracs BMAWM .Tba boo"IN t►u ens we bsswittly W rasa r I,*won devctsbed ak.re wtth ram out Willpco�e Sat►Am 2:Osivirw NeirhlrrMa's"1S►raaas.n�lu Is an ant wit al Brack Bmukvwd w1 el Henri,street b.wWsd by Willow At allot Aster Avrssue.T*w haws sn of the 190"ARI a rill rat MUW-(&N&4 I certify(or declare)under penalty of rrrinry that the forego- bnmieK. •Sat Ae&t � sorb in is tote an,l cnttrcl. d(faro,,Ansue,east d Lytsba Strata wash of W 1t� litrrt,s►1 GARDEN GROVE .. out d N'rbals alto.:.Thin � s tmd ewe ed dwls a Wfavwb Dated et.................................. ►ctitrs sw etacdsrd LWO sq.It.tots.tier of the ballast fate back W Ike raid•19y0 a /•l 8� tine Ant l lir+od 3bae$tieialbatvasd Yahs+reasr+t.This Is as sass al i ' 22S td June aanh d Garfield Av.nue.amth d Yorlato s.wet d BIQA bum esd fast Cab or is,thin ,.... ay of...... 19........ d Atartaulr •%W am cm.isy It Wo early bwrs buds in the stilly i U.tt br twuaidKetwsiad tJsel tab (set lw nMre d(utsb aig wd esrastttuu as t!`�r..•: ...�. !Lr„ J. Richter artscw eirsifeat a'fnt rs the w�'+Y W balsa eavaewecst:ard.«ead,adr ................. a*Awnallow z;MM p.4was)how dwWood sot Ill propparot as Batuos$ata� , / felled U a+at tondos tke Nation tarhanwSnW Alloory Art of 190 IPL 91- Signature 1906 . . - .. , The rewxa Gr Malt dr•iskaw act la prepare such Wwral art at LAOW:Dw to t.'w vw%Aa sow laoatklew r!tat$huts drurmwW that$iWiast sstasl M-Wco s WMW ad ha iayscvcd by thwr M�ir!1a The pe*W ut ad)mud is a s.,t d histttied reare arc wbert bttarwal rssoarm(road twat T'Ila ah$ wlject uw we ad a avilasd.Mod pt"or steak tstvt.ass$wJl b,ue impart o.ardaeKer,d specie+d relr x$to$9�er Tbs Wood sofa fad alb a 00116C.104.6 ef w ad wilbus 2"foot d ao g.yrKet"bstard was' Pminesnn tsl ltevin ltscarda r$s{aetigt tM wb1K+pedatts boat herw easel$h1 the abwe-armd Ccty d Hustinam be orb whir►tauarx the tnriraemestsl erriew d the pn*xu asd tare Gal!!h set AWLS 1W orates shy scrhi Usisaaw iserr squire Vas d. t P,arirmoraW oes Psccrdi we an fie at Or shone adder,and are ava&ble for pubic twee mt ion soul copyist ups rooltod at tH I-ard Moore brtraw the baen dam a M.and$(A pq. rro farther"nummtsut rr"m or am* pr 7ou is".A to to eocdat:W'. �rart u W rrqumt but sent of Pwhnl Ysnd& '92062 'Allsntemied afrnnea.(smug,.or indrtrluas drarteeLtr with tubas at the that tr{r..,d actom an osnuJ to vdait sm.es eerslsrese Fr aondcrstYa feuds c.�.nta ei sdt to,wr at IM Win titnet,ba as twbry July 9.1961.AD evines u, camornu rennd will be eosaidsnd sod ur CAN d Ilunumla o Omit vrW st. tarot Ur noel d rdenl tends ar tdu say stoat m test de.eiv pr..iwra prier! 1rai to liO's writt$s toth.xiuilm W um thra issda It is rwMwA d that taw Lasars . • MW emftilfvs alto NtU�d the poyaved aniwa are betyt addnarsd The City d Haesfrras Bewb win w deriolhe 0a pperoo��rettst t4srnlyd s iovs wttb lt{oc!I Goa funds foals M)wWa Tale!d for H(UA•19M The full of Hatt,gwo i BWA Y citify' to HeD that tw('icy d Hastirt(tea Bich cad ChWA s W. Ttoampsa4 is►s alTici$I eay.rx r[h7 lydas action is�eaoinsi�att$ue.,arts(to aec*pt Ste$ relater to des.volsoratsl nrir+the FW" dacieioa mtiia!asd senteL sad(heal three rnJsss• wbdaass►eve bees astofnd TLt Metal dfect d th.tornhIciaws h that upon iv asp Mal Bkork Grant fa-da mar bee�d,and HUO will bare utwud its tarpassibst. have t-dw the National Fmimamraut Poky Ad of IPM HiM wif sxW an dy is iu spyeasl d t!w news d roods+ad acreytaosca d t!r ewtflfoasesa it d Y on tat d W 105wis$boa is)That(ells,eettifvao'so+w ad is tut' 41)1 lb"the appf>a ',WO by the Codffy*�unsxeawt i r�erir.�r a Wr pevisc� in tHas M"Q seas d it ngmnd ibodo ss tindM at step a/glimble Is the propacts Is Um wvedo- +total a Mew plot (kf*0sros mud be ptepand sad rulmkW s atmdssa silk the Kvair$d clew etader 2{tTR Part idTi d tSe lataia kefulatisa louod is the Pedant drtW April t2,19MI ss"r salsas s»avedabie ie the diks d ter IGrarit Itiodphial.T1e9 ha eldres.wl to FAvow sasW Clevolm Offs US IhpaAmesr d Hoar arsd�Dnabpwem.r.01%Bahl Bsafsrwd.Los An«rMa GJf rnia WM?. pOrb►rct. to HUD as tie-hot d eras(s basis other titan tarot dated In that' f, %ii%will goi�td jjn i�d by RM No objedir:a ttai+ad after My' C7nrMa%Thasepsre MW Main stret iaa J.-W 21.ism Hrasb,Glifuai$l�ta t /. J 1 REQUE6 r 10 COIL ACTION ILMO XV. Date September 6,1983._ Submitted to: Flonorabl Ma nd Council Submitted by: Charles W. ompson, City Admini.stra o4e, Prepered by: James W. Palin, Director of Development Service p Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CONS LIDATION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA x2's *53/ 0_ Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitter: for the City Council's consideration is a resolution ! adopted by the Planning Commission ,�ngoo ra '-g the Redevelopment i Agency to consolidate certain properties within the Oakview Re- develupment Area. RECOtZMENDATION: ` The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.531 D, ANALYSIS. APPLICA�NTt Planning Commission REQUEST: Adoption of a resolution encouraging the consol- idation of properties within the Oakview Redevel- opment Project Area. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON .r,ITY 26, 1983: ON MOTION BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY PORTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 1311 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Erskine NOES: None kBSENT: Higgins, Schumacher, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: On July 19, 1983 the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Applications permitting the Mola Devel- opment Corporation to construct a 395,300+ square foot commercial/ office complex on 13+ acres of property located at the southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue. At the Public hearing on the project, the applicant suggested to the Planning Commission that as part of the redevelopment effort in the Oakview area con- solidation of all property bordered by Beach Boulevard, Warner P10 4181 - T J / ORPA Page 2 Avenue, Ash Street, Sycamore Alrenue, Elm Street and Cypress Avenue into one (1) integrated project would be desirable from a planning standpoint. The Planning Commission concurred and on July 26, 1363 the Com- mission adopted the attached resolution recommending that the City Council recommend that the City of Huntington Beach Redevel- opment Agency do everything in its power to promote the develop- ment of one (1) integrated project within the above mentioned area. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS= The proposal is exempt from environmental review. FUNDING SOURCE: Not-applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Denial of the Planning Commission's recommendation. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Area Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1311 I JWP:JRB:sr 1� i i f • r i. '.'.S`I'....». .r..• t 1 ti... f - +• At RI RII RI • r2 � ww rl wr. RRss�► j .r ml R3 RZ `+ � e 41 �1 RI f�R, RIs A s p �2� + 1 M , ! � a Rs •� 4 _R E ' f o �, �; CF-E Rs os w•RI R1 u R : m! ,� _ R3 ,, R2 , , % ,� cr Rs Rl R2 I. C4 i •t s �,• � u., W&PN[R _ MI 2 R5 s RI RI .� ,/c4-ARC r ...,.a.,. c,. .. , R 2 :� , c R2 2 ♦/ Rt at i Y RZ ..� � � : , RI RI RI CF-R RI RI f' t ` +. ! Ca'R! ...,. Ri -Mae- a 11,� RI :mow: R2 I R 2 I Ri CF -- -� R3 � � � RI RI ink ' -C ,,•. ,J a3 C4: Ica f 1� I . jl i R3 ( R1 �! .Rea , CF-E 'I-CO Ix jr ,•1 ,n RI�. E r t FRfil- PO 1:7 .t � C1 ` Ca RI RI RI I CUr8 ►~17 �A a i } HUNTINGTON WACH PLANNING DIVISION Irilwip1lGiDN MACH i S s Of /2-4 INTIM Superior Court r)►TIIY. STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY 0 IRL ROOR OF P I ATION HUNTINGTON BEACH r.fS '� PUBLIC 140TICE State of California 1 ' County of Orange sof► g a t x>i ht tivc� D It ISM POtl IM WTI H R CITY cum An APRIL L. ELLIOTT tmr �`swm ouCH 20 That 1 am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of �"t the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I t•tn ALL Ih r���GR{rUM1O� sr aMsrt am not n p+rty to,nor interested in the sixwe entitled matter, �y �1 ' that I am the princil al clerk of the printer of the d tb Hooks$ass tasworrty UnWMw�al Act f IAi l L ]t0I far 1110 aaii.wnr,t wet• cilt>i>t�r iwpt r - H U N T I N G T O N BEACH I N U. REV. TNrs nlr+tr t�iq yr wai lshsttart� a.aspt ia'(e�i.atls.l«r+run wttt of Mile Low h _shim xis Arai i1.lritai Ar.,+ar++• a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of UkMkirkmill wa � ri{iaa�".mprswtnsa j 00.8orw4whN as{� stalk �y4wa,eatsrnrttiaa a tsn(is1 rim Isr'tN M rsv H U N T I N G T O N BEACH w axb.w PA saw,W 4"WrariD if M at1ilN+tW County of Orange and which ti wspaper is published for the 4srtssw tMq slew as'=a 09`a'"Pbw N am Is Ntosw w w eww Fvwr utlw�w/haw.MsA.M trww r ttr disemination of local news and intellisence of a general charac 8aarlt sN M W + . ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had It.Itlw d doft M4@wMesrirrrairfwtds0Matt tlt and still has a None fide subscription list of paying sulAcribere. "`d0s " yty�,� t keens swYsaaral ayty,w(lty Mrs lwa art r ptps as and which newspaper has Bern established,printed and pub- imMct"+wash awn W Krlys(bromarsatsl i�WI Art d IMb w1•' lished at regular intervals in the Laid Ceatnly of Orange fora u'l ` t Tlw raw ss for idil*1 ad r a�wiri6iM ah i*M M period exceeding one year; that the noticr, of which the hha►be.A I% III , fart trtrr�attcw�rslasswallastlrfgreb/ annrxed is s printed copy,has peen published in the regular ebirtrrr�lb liw In an ttksw and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement (paai� rrraie sisw.1l•re ri7 M r iLt+rt an "aim Mwim w rats.n r aa+rra' thereof,on the following dates,to wit: 'ha pt.Inct rite ha ri"Hs iu cst. M rN*Ma am I"t of:e`qwt Abills ImAr u ssaW%Mrs Nand -%M W"I 1r•taw rAici dcrviwrw w aerMss+roKsl W ttY ari arw silty alts , Aelo w A/suck OM AN"b artw Y1a M!♦Y1ox�r Rwrlarr AwUlie�M� AUG. 18 s 1983 W*s It &%at a wnia 4W It"srMawe�kr s a�to"`wl ecl7ks�+ n at LhWrowboossa0ama1 a �m t+nfsrgat—wriw d tM tNwl r fn�rri M CMd�etal}Ntt t.W V"WW I*raker d pr&M&xk As taMrMW arasai",fft"p a WMsliats Air W4- eltji 1%,pap6oi xenon sn Vh VW to ssbW•r.ttsa 10 asrsi" a►MslRtt saw"atfl b rrsitrd ft.XMt6 Main turret as a tstwa&*MOW L IN A/Aiwa eaalwtatt .r,A�M aosrlrrad asp tla d ibrsdi MA stt Alasxt st 1 certifyIns declare)under perjury erg Prinat lard+er ea prf•d t+ r of penalty ofthat the forego- sut►.ess"b 00 00"w'�It is tanutrrlY ing is true and correct. Lp+ T`�"�d tM MaO�d miens aim ` .J.. patrciat........GARDEN—GROVE .................. �t cuer�yttiy�sa row' 1+tW►IC�A•ttrtTo d we ON&th^Q7w•M tit(lftm alwt w CbpV .ratsaYs r Mt California.this ....19.111yof ....AUGa9....93 , ,t�76t �a"'aH'asell aw"UhMWit"'''" 'leis�,,,,s b+l "tu.a bras sttL"TWI 1 0.M tAa nrldws m it OML love as k tr r k E I 1 >�Q t t gveRsL b Ware host a"kr rswt awe ro triti 11M artUe)td w rsgaeaa'iih ni.0,4 W xdirast {.f ism HIM owd at.rpt as ` y r k y J ss«tee IodgerWles M j tah M d W 4M of do wrUacatraa Signature W Thd w rrrtoirwrisa nas 24 Is Ism nteUW by the Cwidylg tdflicar n .atyrdGtrrrrgptiisa ppe, by)ILUat ibl Wt aOmmgti aat4owuntd weirs weed&w w k4kato ati coin"d tM vvgWW dou"Aadrn a My Ipbo 4 is U*prapsrt M tM eaboamrrta!n+ww twrcw. (bjartiorr tr,.t�per/arai s>a ieeredasee w i th. ,miry 2 '(c 1L7S of ttes laterfw Iwd M till i dazed Apnl IL IW—Tt+rw srs ararU"M tke Wnm d de CHI d wtiactcu lrre'h TMT awl be�ta:9xvir"WMal chersace of x". tt S llr c ne0 d HHowaa 9W t:1t a De"V pa0at.rile YtlMlwr Bouk7W,EM m a M as w nisw sl AsLdr ss bmis aLrc then thre rased is iW pprrrr.ri"pataZ►apk aD a*becase 4 H a by)1CIU•Aid sbprtiea rrai..d afterssrptab�r tu,t9est rt71 M x.a.d.rtd by L'U rhmin W Thntp.aa ?Y Strut 'IV Main PU4Auj is.►•.-O 4 r NOI ICE TO PUBLIC OF REQefti' FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS AND NOTO!0� OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON ThL ENVIRONMENT . . . HAS BEEN POSTED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND CENTRAL LIBRARY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 I. TO ALL IN'iERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS AND PERSONS: On or about September 5, 1983, the City of Huntington Beach will request the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment (HUD) to release Federal funds under Title I of the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act of 1974 (PL-93-383) for the following project: OAKVIEW PHASE II r These funds will be used to expand the concept to be implemented on one block of Koledo _Lane in the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. The initial .demonstration proj- ect includes closure of Koledo Lane, removal of current street improvements, con- struction of landscape and hardscape improvements and parking bays witHin 'this right-of-way, improvement of the alley surrounding the project, rehabilitation of the existing 4-plexes, construction of a new five car garage at the rear of each property and, at the option of each owner, the construction of an additional two- bedroom apartment unit above the new garages. Oakview Phase 11 zrea is bounded by {I Slater Avenue to the south, Barton Drive to the north, Nichols Street to the west and Beach Boulevard to the east. 11. It has been determined that such request for release of funds will not constitute an action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, accordingly, the City of Huntington Beach has decided not to prepare an environmental impact state- .1 ment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-10.0). The reasons for such decision not to prepare such statement are as follows: It has been determined that significant natural resources would not be impacted by this project. The project is not located in an area of historical significance, or where historical resources would be found. The subject site is not in a wetland, floodplain or scenic river. There will be nc impact on endangered species, or sole source aquifers. The project site falls within the 65 CNL and is not within 2000 feet of an "upset hazard" area. An Environmental Review Record respecting the subject project has been made which documents the environmental review of the project and more fully sets forth the reasons why such statement is not required. The Environmental Review Record is on file at the above address and is available for public examination and copying upon request at the third flord oetween the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ( ' No further environmental review of the project is proposed to be conducted prior t to the request for release of Federal funds. All interested agencies, groups or individuals disagreeing with the proposed actions are invited to submit written comments for consideration. Such comments will be received at 2000 Main Street on or before September 2, 1983. All written comments will be considered and the City of Huntington Beach will not request the release of Federal funds or take any action on the described project prior to HUD's written authorization to use those funds. It is requested that those forwarding comments specify which of the proposed actions are being addressed. i 1 i OBJECTIONS TO HUD The City of Huntington Beach will undertake the project described above with Block Grant funds from HUD under Title I of the HCDA-1974. The City of Huntington Beach is certifying to HUD that the City of Huntington Beach and Charles W. Thompson, in his official capacity as City Administrator, consents to accept the jurisdic- tion of the Federal courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to environmental review, decision-making and action; and that these respon- sibil'ities have been satisfied. The legal effect of the certification is that, upon its approval, Block Grant funds may be used and HUD will have satisfied its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. HUD will accept an objection to its approval of the release of funds and acceptance of the certification only if it is cn one of the following basis: (a) That the certification was not, in fact, executed by the Certifying Officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD; or (b) that applicant's environmental review record for the project indicates an omission of a required decision finding or step applicable to the project in the environmental review process. = Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedures �:. . under 24CFR '58.75 of'the Interim Regulations found in the Federal Register dated April 129 1982. These Regulations are available in the office of the City of ( :' Huntington Beach. They may be addressed to: Environmental Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90057. Objections to HUD on'the release of funds on basis other than those stated in the previous paragraph will not be considered by HUD. No objection received after September 20,1983 will be considered by HUD. Charles W. Thompson 2000 Fain Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 .: Publish: August 18, 1983 IN7'IIF: Superior Court ot•�t�: STAIR G F CALIf'(►tMA In and(or(fir County of Orarnge fsftrtr,r nF)'l ltil WATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City Administrator PUBLIC NOTIC(,E� I�NLiAi�t:��S' '71�•t Sinlr of(:slift+rnia 1 r 4 OMW400&C0M MV'4 i v 1 1 .• colully(.(Orange )`t' RldtiA�O►lIDdtY t'6 tw11tX ro rtwc al, t+atl ttllnsAs al,► � or nnx a or no lrolrrrr� t ea'r�re art tl■t rort New nit t�v cat+o A cur I"LMWycm q., JAMIE J. MOORE M Mot drttxt r That f am anti nl oft tirnr+herein mentioned a.s♦a cititrn of 'a r w' the Ilnitrd State+.#stet till,a l,#sf Iwrnt nor rsrs,ar.d that 1 i1 �'pp't � an w�"A R y y �+tt'LR.t tlr Cats st Ktsesi run wars'W t 1 w d nm nut a party In.nor interested its file above entitled+natter; W Rllnaad tk rDrwly�_ (HIID)wNbtwrhlwrlt�wis that I urn the prinew.tl rlt•rk of till,printer of the iv . Aetsf t17�f • l�ltlllr♦G Arat M{*dw Ch boas Muir asaar i IV(7.�t.1L+e 11rri+n!tar Mrd HUNT. PEACH I N U. REV. .y t+ae,lYwe w c�ryyyy aetssilts aEMI�lvattMf+e,l,ata/ tyh K Nu tom•IMoroi,ta.,,, t allkrw,(�►tw Albrti�►r4 Lawaa a nrw,paprr of reneral circulation,pnh!i,}?.d in the City of SWAtimel•lraetat t.. tI�Ar/waa iN 11i ailr�it � a d N UN T I N G T O N BEACH of � re twll r lfrlq t and laa vwfts !sw era�iitdl► a.ara<Awt -. ., ,....,,,. County of Criangr and tthich nru•xpat•rr i.pubtichrtl fur il:r �a 'W' s'or ' r'wt•"fWYri1■ dis-rininatinn of local nrwa and intrlti;;r•tu r of it Rrn•t,at thatsc sr aetdh LJ ter, and %fifth nrw•wpap,•r at nil tirn.•+ l:arrin mrntivned had W and tafill has n fsttna fide•uhu•riptiun Ii.t oCprtyin„suh�rrif,er,. p.� I and uhfch nrwrpat,rr hav tern ettnblikhvd,printed end pub 1*11M ,wnttrr also lishtti at reptar intervals i,t the a6:,id ('aunty of Orange far a period rueeding #site year; th+sl (fir volice. (if which the Zbia b sil aetr#seal at"emit N*mbww am of Nrdr�jr�rtt ""t�' a• 1t snw Awtaw W NAW A.rwu annexed it a ptintt•d ropy,ha% been p•rhli�hed ire the rrrullt ISO Hatstrdxraai+Ydvlo end entire isue of acid nrw•si,,,prr,anti nt-t in"fly►upplrnselit ids t+h+wltltawlnllodiatlrtwlr shelf thereof.t,n the fciluwing sietr,l,tit wit: fi7laAarre>t'IY t; N 1 Mi la aS atf ii W sm 4i4 M�Mai aptbt anaellaa of a14Y Marry as aaasbd d�10Nr feai . boa ttaa,+i Ila loam tree lad d 1Me Idti05� u h lea Moo draersYro'AN aA ttatiataat Asr aaia.r dAreis r4ra1 al, •.•ti,sr aAueWti t6a tfaYy,M(ON boom w*kMlartt bww{. ie y.tAr ha)at wta f3secM Mee dod"sat b a U 11 19$ Wpo t rwa�art srlrr Itaa f4taad XwbrrwerW PA4 A aof t_�i•�1FL V 1 Tlt n,�soet Ate wrl drrieies Ur rr awd.s,ta u"era as N& U,sr b tyrkw a+rr Lcattarts.K lM Irw aaN Will rfmflMet area t a@NMI a+0rlt a1R laf taa*aty ti U mu pojalhl no rrtireM of ON tamed IN Y' ' Nra d It M swhMct 0#04 anrtpi0asa rt or floor Abfasicrl ttaeetrpa uarld M!tired" oeo ut t•r fsKlsstl,tlod�lrlw sa mark rirra�M rs )certify(or declare)under prnatty of prrj•try tile: the ton,;u � wWrw whatl��!ad�ea.,araaiarsrneaget�4rw.'ryrpyrnr11a1 t,�yw ink is true and a,rrret. sMtirmoo bdalaa-mpg M�.rd•am Aa tt�Mt vbklk I)strdat.......G... . . ..ROVE..... ............. d ►ralbutrw�,,q .rlawr rrrnrlii i, ft ra 06 at 1Mr aMrw adiw toad Is a.riVW hr srMMr aq:arttao �d t rPr• rtwwnitta.etaralwlawMe.a.xCaeora) tierraafRMra$I1t pIdOPAIL. califnrnia.thia .A2thd.,ynf orde%aw f'e�wM I /s/ J A M I E J. M�G R�,\�,t•4.�.1�.L.�`—`.��l C l '' +raiw�.t of:3W Iir�"on W"a n 2L na As a •t dam, e.n+.Arent><tlet As eiw.OF w r 111110 W'Clyud t+aextsrta.aaw We sat Mpa*w S i n nt to r i *row a aa7 atsl'a w iM d'r°rsard trw�aMs 1s Ms ro M117a Mr rr thew pr& ft it riot Ihtw�trardi� . r ttsrwrtter sPardf*limit t1�tSe Nr�wrsf TO FitlO � i . .... Bt sOaaat�lillihrxli keel,ftW�J�C'11t)sb t4 fIlim 'LA.f4ft(yad�N aaa lSeasM i arttR•1rt IpSD eltt iM t7y at 1i+trrJls+rr Aarri ad t ZLaeapaos !te MY aide I�rgt�M ph .pwift the { ►urisa+etto d tla 1'adaesd arrtu Y as sartia�tr iwtry� ty 1 ti tier a eatW.dsatrkr arJ aatttMst xwp.w;. ttiMtisr lrse Mrs trarYkt.q'b Mya1 abet rf tilt r. eyyrorat,a oss Coat.ttmY mill be rood as d lftli W2 Mew rtliatQ ►rttr km feeder tlr Itsetirtri tirraverwtal Poiry Astfss ofIla HUD�W aetarttl obi.rim on ttr rtw pr al,us r.fa sm of toil,ad"Mu"at rod. diti,onleecfW,10L"la:al, . W I%d the sioswiearioa owe ox.is be.awoaad by w cmvyj>l brier �.POP 92082 ' Ibl tb rat tMnnt � te Iew" id for t�h�e�ra�reae � r eioa rs• dretwtt fLtsK sr atrp 4P a91*Cb is as aerie j d t ' Oki vrA M Is '•1 nod aalsetifra/k aawitaas MtA j•, r{+ CF... ream lrCf n d w Ial.►lee tXrtt,sietfrae/rued!s Ly r erm r • dead Apt I tle2 Thme f bsr rn a 841,ta too 0*Wn-M o w Cite rt .tan tlare� e�mad be adrkrard is Er.bartt rout CZrvraar 002k r, C'$Pvan arw d Ha,r 4 and Urbm pe.otoyrwt,UM'AT06 a 1K Calf�ruie At067. tkotlervd,L w • tatstrelr,�el to HI.T a t6 sslra,r d herb m boob rthn s m tier rtaurl r llr W eat M eardaed 11 IiVU No sijectA,os tmnod at" i As t,ui rr.I MCr U lee trealidttt I bby�RM Ad�airttab HPS N e stxn 1ta;s St a� ate M Baba,CA V.)M& 1 Hart Krrci<InS t4r a}t "rod 1 REQUEST rOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACi1ON Date January 6, 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency c,i�- Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer Uty Prepared by: Q�%ffice of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO-ISSUE BONDS FOR FINANNCING {� ' OFFICE AND RELATED COMMERCIAL FACILITIES WITHIN THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA _ -� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: '• ` STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Within the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area the City has the opportunity to com- mence immediately to coordinate'and assist with the further development and en- hancement of the area. One step in this process which the Agency may take at this time is the adoption of the attached resolution of intent to provide tax exempt financing for the future construction of office and related commercial facilities within the area. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and order the Agency Clerk to execute the attached resolution no. 67 authori- zing the Agency to issue bonds for entering into financing leases or agreemtnts for the purpose of financing office and related commercial facilities to be co trusted within, the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area for Huntington Financial Towrnd s, a California General Partnership at the southwest corner of Beach Boulevard Warner Avenue. ANALYSIS: The California Communit Redevelopment Law authorizes redevelopment agencies (in Part I of Division 24(D of the California Health and Safety Code) to issue and sell bonds for the purpose of financing office, industrial and commercial structures in areas where the Agency is active. Such bonds provide for the purchasers tax exempt interest income and, by virtue of this tax exemption, rates on' these bonds are generally lower than other investments carrying a Federal income tax obliga- tion. The pool of funds generated through the sale of such tax exempt mechanisms may then be used to provide construction and long-term financing for the construc- tion of office, industrial and commercial facilities. the major goal estdblishad by the adoption of the Beach Boulevard Corridor Rede- velopment Survey Area is the expansion of the City's industrial and commercial base, and the subject project of the attached resolution is adjacent to the corri- dor and within the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. The one major and most beneficial tool available to the Redevelopment Agency to meet this goal is the use of its powers to provide tax exempt financing. Not only is the provision of such favorable financing an inducement to furthev development within the area, but it also offers the Agency the opportunity to generate additional revenues which will be used to upgrade the balance of the area. i PIO 4fa1 i f Another provision of the Community Redevelopment Law cited above requires that such tax exempt financings for commercial or office facilities can only be done in increments of $10 million. Therefore, for projects exceeding this amount, it is necessary to adopt a series of "inducement resolutions" such as the one attached. Also required by law is that any one entity is limited to participation in an amount not to exceed $10 million. However, a perscn or entity may be a partner in such financing if participation is limited to 49 percent or less of the total financing. Therefore, while Mola Development Corporation will retain control of the office/ commercial project at Warner and Beach, the attached resolution is in the name of "Huntington Financial Towers", within which Mola Development will be a partner. This is the second such resolution for this project; the first having been adopted by the Redevelopment Agency in November, 1982. It is important to note that several other jurisdictions within Southern California are competing for similar types of commercial and office development. Several of these jurisdictions (including Irvine, Garden Grove, Santa Ana and San Bernardino) have chosen to enhance their locale's desirability for commercial and office enter- prisps by providing tax exempt financing. Therefore, it's becoming increasingli, important that, to be successful in this competition, the Huntington Beach Rede- velopment Agency should consider this type of inducement. The specific project for tax exempt financing on the attached resolution is: Project: bola Development Corporation (dba Huntington Financial Powers) : office and commercial facilities Warner and Beach Bouelvard $10,000,000 Developer: Mr. Frank Mola is President of Mola Development Corporation and the firm maintains its corporate headquarters at 808 Adams Avenue, Huntington Beach, California. As principal of this firm. Mr. Mola has been responsible for a wide variety of residential and commercial development projects within the City of Huntington Beach. It should be pointed out that the adoption of the attached resolution is only the first step in providing tax exempt financing for this facility. Substantial addi- tional participation by the Agency's staff and its bond counsel will be required before these financings will be brought to the Agency for final approv-0. CWT:SVK:jb r �A� QZ�snper 1 1 STATF Of CA11►ORN1A STATE 90ARD OF EQUALIZATIONT °tOt 1 A. atilt /iH1 Dit+r$r.Son rm-mco 1020 N STIEET, SACRAMENTO. CAUFORNIA tINIST ). DIOSIN1100.J1 1P.0. DOX 1799, SACRAMENTO, CA1110RN1A 959081 Second Di,H6r1.San Diepo November 16, 1982 W1111AM M RtNNI" 916/322-1-23 Third Dirlrict. Son 101ee1 :ICHARD NEVINS rovrl6 Dilrrkt,►aevdeno IIENN(IN COIY to-Troller.Stlrrolnenlp DOUGIAS D.Ittt SerrNme Ms. Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk rr-tun.e City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Her. Wentworth: This is to acknowledge_ receipt of Ordinance No. 2582 adopting and approving; the amendment to the redevelopment plan for the Uakview Redevelopment Project. Also received were the map and description of the amended project boundarie$. The map you filed is unacceptable. Please send us a large scale (1" x 200'-) map that accurately delineates the adopted boundaries. This map should be a sepia reproducible map. The final boundaries are not identical to the preliminary ones that were filed with us. Although the. ordinance was adopted within the time frame specified in the Statement of Preparation, the base-year values of state-assessed properties contained in our letter of October 1, 1982 to the Orange County Auditor may not be valid. If we need to submit the final map to our assessees to determine the actual base-year values, we will have to impose an additional fee. of $190. We do nut know how much state-Lssessed property may lie within the area that was deleted from this project. If you believe there is very little, we could avoid the recomputntion. We do, however, need a better map than the one you sent us. ; Sincerely, Martin C. Rohrke i Utility Roll Analyst VALUATION DIVISION MCR-.jb Enclosure cc: Orange County Assessor Orange County Ate'itor i I t ' STATE BOARD Or EQUALIZATION REQUIREMENTS FOR 15OUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS, STATEMENTS, MAPS • and t SCHEDULE OF PROCESSING FEES �(J• far REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS J Sections 33327, 33328, 33328.4, 33375 and 33457, Q�� Health and Safety Code. Effective Jartiory 1, 198" 1. GENERAL APPLICATION. All statutory references herein are to the Health and Satoh Code. The prepo- totion of the report required by Section 33328 will "al commence until the filing is accepted as provided in Section 33328.3. Subdivision maps, assessor's maps and deeds are not an file with tite State Boord of Equalization, nor nre such documents readily available to its stuff irs Sacramento whete all processing of the stole level is per- i formed. Boundary descriptions that merely cite recorded documents or refer to ossessur's• parcels are of very limited value to the Board's draftsmen. The maps filed pursunnt to Section 33327 serve a dual purpose. first, they are transmitted by ut to rile public utility companies whose property is assessed by the Board. Nearly 88% of all state-assessed property consists of improvements and personal property. Much of this is in the form of "continuous structures" -- power lines, telephone cable, gas mains, and is locuted over or under streets and alleys. It is most important that the f' relationship of project boundaties with streets is clearly and accurately delineated on file reaps. In many cases, state assessoes will have to r.:ake measurements on these maps. Because of this, the accuracy of the base year assessed values will be directly related 13 the quality of the maps sent to us. Secondly, tics same mnp cal be used for filing under Section 33375, when they will be used in conjunction with tine legal descrtp• lion to delineate the project boundaries on the Board's tax-role area maps. This map work makes possible tire j automatic derivation of subsequent changes in assessed values for tax increment funding purposes as a by- product of future assessment rolls. The requirements given in Section 2 herein were developed with the foregoing points in mind. In many cases, these some requirements have e-tisted for city or district boundary maps and descriptions for several years. We ore merely applying them to redevelopment projects. Please mail all filings and amendments to: Valuation Division, Stole Board of Equalization, P,O, iio% 179q, Sacramento, CA 95808. inquiries concerning maps, legal descriptions or fees should be sent to Mr. Marlin C. Rohrlse. Questions concern:hg the determination of base year assessed values should be sent to Mr. Jay Nubert, Valuation Division, State Board of Equalization, P.O. Box 1799, Sacramento, CA 95808. Please call Mr. Hubert or Mr. Rohrke at 916/322-2323. 2. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS, STATEMENTS AND MAPS. All documents filed with us ate microlilmed and j then recycled or destroyed on an annual basis. Any document that will not produce a readable photographic image must be rejected and returned to Ilia sender for replacement. j (a) BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS. Every boundary des:riptian must be self-sufficient within itself without the necessity of reference to any extraneous document. A boundary description making teference only to assessor's parcels, subdivisions ur lots within subdivisions is not acceptable unless all dimensions needed to plot ilia boundaries are givort on the accompanying project area map. When n desr,iption refers to a deed or recorded document, such references should be secondary in nature. Our draftsmen should be able to plot the boundaries from the legal descriptien. For an amendment of boundary, the entire perimeter of the added or deleted land must described.1 n us be d sc Sed. (b) STA1 EMENTS. The statement shall be in the form and style shown below. This form of statement is also designed to satisfy the requirements in Section 33328 with respect to the selection of tho base year assessment roll. I I 2 STATEMENT OF PREPARATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR (Name of Project) TO: Auditor, Assessor, Tax Collector of County, to all other affected taxing entities and to the Stole Board of Equalization. Pursuant to Section 33327 of Ilia California Health and Safety Code, you are hereby notified that the Redevelopment Agency of the (Name of city or county) is in the process of completing a redevelopment plan for the (Name of project) It is the intention of the Agency to complete said plan a..d to have it adopted pursuant to Ilia California Community Redevelopment Low. ' i It is the intention of the X-oncy to use the (fiscal year) roll as the Buse Year Assessment Roll for tSre allocation of taxes pursuant to Section 33670 of lire Health and Safety Code. Dated: Redevelopment Agency of l 4 Chetk one only (No.ne of city or county) _ (Signature) Initial plar, Name L1Amended plan Title (c) MAPS (1) Every mop must clearly show all existing streets, roads, and highways lying within or adjacent L. i to -i line which is 300 legit from the boundaries of Ilia project area, together with the names of there thorough. 7r fares. The telatiorrship of the project area boundaries and Ilia line w!rich lies 300 feet from those boundories r with street rights-of-ways must be clearly and accurately delineated. New boundary lines must not obliterate right-al-way, subdivision or property lines. Suggested boundary line symbols are shown below. If a mop is = being filed for an addition to an existing project it is preferred that the map cover only the immediate vicinity of the adr!itian. A marginal key explaining boundary symbols is necessary. Do not show future street align- rnents or zoning on the project area boundary map. 300' radius Exisldnp b.)undary of any project ..� ` Now boundary ` ` .,......., 300' perimeter L ST. b � I� - 3 (2) Maps of project areas shall be drawn to these minimum scales: I ACREAGE WITHIN PROJECT AREA MINIMUM MAP SCALES I under 10 acres 1" = 100' 10 — 40 acres 1" = 200' 40 — 200 acres V. = 300. 200 — 1000 acres 1" = 400' or 1" = 500' over 1000 acres 1" = 600' to 1" = 1000' If any segment of the boundary is shorter than 1/40 of the map stole (i.e., 10 feet on a 1" = 400' scale map) j that segment should be shown enlarged on a merginol sketch. (3) Every map shall bear a scale and north point. If a reduced map is to be filed, the original map shall have a graphic scale affixed to it before the reduction is made. Thn reduced copies must meet the scale requirements given in Section 2. The name of the project shall appear on every mop. (4) All maps must be professionally drawn. Rough sketrhes or pictorial drawings are not acceptable. (5) Redevelopment agencies filing pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33327 shall send one copy of the map of the proposed or amended project area boundaries to county and !axing agency officials. Thep shall furnish the State Board of Equalization with an unfolded reproducible map (sepia or duplicate tracing). If facilities for making such a reproducible map do not exist, fifteen copies of the original map may be furnished. (6) If the proposed boundaries are significantly amended, a revised sepia or fifteen revised copies ' of tho map shall be filrd. 3. PROCESSIRG FEES. The entire initial fee indicated below shall accompany the Statement of Preparation. I( the proposed project or amendment is terminated prior to formal adoption, the mopping portion of the initial fee shalt be refunded. A written notice of termination is required. Please make checks payable to the State Board � of Equalization. (a) INITIAL FEE. Single area project or amendment, f ACREAGE WITttIN PROJECT OR --- SbA E YEAR MAPPING AFTER TOTAL INITIAL i AMENDMENT C CALCULATION ADOPTION FEE 0 — 10 s 3 + $ 130 - $ 160 11 — 20 $ 70 + S ISO = S 220 21 -- 60 S 130-.. + $ 220 = S 350 D�k�11 RDV 1 _ 1 90 + a - s 510 101 -- 660 $ 350 + 430 = S 780 !. 661 — 1500 $ 450 + S 600 = $1,050 1501 -- 3000 $ 550 + $ 790 - $1,340 3001 — 6000 $ 700 + $1,000 = $1,700 over 6000 $1,000 + $1,500 = $2,500 (b) INITIAL FEE. Multiple area project ar amendment. Add S50 to the fee as calculated above for each area over one. Every excluded island shall consti. tute one additional area for the purpose of computing the fee. t ' 4_ (c) ADDITIONAL BASE YEAR CALCULATION FEES. (1) If offer inifioi,boundaries an filed,-the additional fern shall 'veRwMs Initial bass year calaulation fve:-,- (2) If the base year values must be r.icomputed because the base year assessment rail as sFacified in Section 33670 is different than the .ne specified in the statement of preparation,the oddi• tional fee shall equal the initial base year calculation fee if It is necessary for the affected state assessees to reinventory their property. If a reinventory is not required, the additional fee shall cwval one half of the initial base year calculation fee. i i I I I ; J i j I NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Huntington Beach 1416 Ninth Street, Room 131 2000 Main Street Sacramento, California 95814 Huntington Beach, California 92648 County Clerk County of Orange F I L IE D P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, California 92702 NOV 12 1982 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. LEE A. 6ftMA County CWk Oakvie:v Redevelopment Project roject T tie SCH #82052411 _ Tom Tincher ,(7141 S36-5542 State Clearinghouse Number, Contact Person Telephone Number Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue ro ect Location Redevelopment of Oakview Area Project Description This is to advise that the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, as "lead agency", has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR and record of project approval may be examined at: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project. Date Received for Filing: otv.., WE Tincher Director, Business and Industrial Enterprise cc: City Clerk b When Recorded, Please Mail To: City of Huntington Beach RECORDED FREE PER GOVERNMENT 2000 Main Street CODE SECTION 6103 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attn: Alicia M. Wentworth RECORDING BENEFITS CITY BY PROVIDING FOR REDEVELOPMENT AREA DESCRIPTION. OF THE LAND WITHIN THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND .4 STATEMENT THAT REDEVELOPMENT PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED Proceedings for the redevelopment of the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area have been instituted under the California Community Redevelopment Law pursuant to a Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted October 25, 1982 by the City council of the City of Huntington Beach by Ordinance No. 2582. The description•of the land within the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area is attached as Exhibit "A". Date: October 26, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk j 5 4 4 i l i 1 �I 1 4 _ t •.� /"1 e-*Sxhibit "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECTrs / ' •.`� That portion of Section 26, Township' 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of 'California, as shown on a map recorded in nook 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder described as follows: Beginning at the east one--quarter corner of said Section 26, thence South 890 24 ' 16" West 463. 11 feet to a point on the southerly pro- longation of the east line of Keelson Lane, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline, said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence along said southerly prolongation South 0° 45' 06" Last 40 feet to the south line of Slater Avenue, a street 80 feet in width, 40 feet either side of centerline; thence . south 11" 14 ' 11" West 1117 feet a?cng said south line to the west line of Tract No. 4091; thence along said west line North 01 44 ' 31" West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 4091; thence along sai^ I north line North 89° 24 ' 39" East 300 feet to the southerly extensiot, of the west line of Oak Lane, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence North 0" 44 ' 46" West 2041 feet along said southerly extension, the west line of Oak Lane and its northerly extension to a line parallel with and 60 feet north measured at right angles from the centerline of Warner Avenue; thence: along said parallel line North 89° 25' 46" lust 1386 feet; to the centerline of Beach Blvd. , said street being 132 ' feet in width, 66 iu feet either side of centerline; thence along said centerline South i 00 45' 14" East 996 feet; thence South 890 25' 00" West 283 feet; thence South 00 45 ' 14" East 288 feet; thence South 890 2S' 00" West r 20 feet; thence South 00 45' 14" East 96 feet to the easterly exten- sion of the north line of Tract No. 8916; thence along said north � line South 89° 25' 00" Wcst 576 frct to the east Line of Ash Street, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline;, thence along said east line South 0° 44 ' 46" cast 100`feet •to a curve. r; concave northeasterly having a radius of 50 feet; thence along said curve southerly And southeasterly thru a central angle of 369 52' 12" an arc distance of 32. 20 feet to a point on a reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 50 feet, a radial frc•m said point bears North 521J 23 ' 02" east; thence along said reverse curve southeasterly, southerly, r and southwesterly thru a central angle of 781, 54 ' 35" an arc distance of 68. 86 feet to a compound curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35 feet, a radial to said'point hears South 48° 42 ' 23" east; thence along said compound curve southwesterly and westerly thru a central angle of. 40° 11 ' 2311 , an arc distance of 29.44 feet to a point on the south line of Mandrell Drive being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said south line south 891 29 ' 00" west 11.8 feet to the east line of tract No. 4301; thence along - said mentioned cast line South 011 44 ' 46" east 210 feet to .a Point on a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 70 feet, said point being on the north tine of Barton Drive and the east line of Queens Lane; thence along said curve and east line southeasterl-• and southerly thru a central angle of 770 44 ' 55" an arc distance of 95 feet; thence South 00 44 ' 52" East 22 feet to a curve concave north- easterly having a radius of 70 feet; thence continuing along the enst • line of Queens Lane and said mentioned curve southerly and southeaster]-.- thru a central angle of 2.70 38 ' 00" an are distance of 34 feet to a reverse curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 130 feet, a radial to said Point bears North 610 37 ' 00" East; thence alone; Said reverse curve southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 27y 3A ' 00" an arc distance of 63 feet to north line of Tract 4153; thence 1. along Said north line north 890 * 24 ' 35" East 125 feet to the cast s . line of Tract 4153; thence njong said east line South 00 44 ' 58" East 500 feet; thence North 890 24 ' 16" East 197 feet to the east line of Keelson Lane; thence nlbnq said cast line and its southerly pro- �. l•ongation 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning. /S/ Alicia M. Wentwo-.•th 'Cl:y C1 erk Huntington geach City ounce Secretary, Huntington Beach Redevelopment Ayc• �. /5/ Charles W. Thom son City Administrator, City of Huntington Beach Executive Officer, Huntington Beach Redevelur Agen, DATED; 8/17/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (714) 536-5227 STATE OF CALIFORNIA S5 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On October 26, 19629 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared Alicia M. Wentworth, known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Eeach, and known to me to be the person I who executed the within instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. Witnessed my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL SEAL C7NNIE A. BROCKWAY U NptARY PUSLIC• CAUM.MIA otary C 5 gnatur PKINCIPAL OFFICE IN }"�I °°A"U couNllr Connie Brockway ' 4a� kr COMMISSION UTMES Oa 10 1915 Name - Typed or Printed) (Seal) ' ;`fit Notary Public in and for said State j REQUES� FOR CITY COUNCICACTION 'P' Date November 4. 1982 Y GIT� GDUN 1� Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council1-014Cy�DY%aB Submitted b -t y/ Y Charles W. Thompson, City Administra Prepared by: ffice of Business and Industrial Enterprise l cirY `'�" Subject: APPROVAL OF KOLEOO LANE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Statement of Iwo, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Oakview neighborhood is included as a target area in the Community and Neighbor- hood Enhancement Program published in October, 1981, and is now a redevelopment project area. In line with this designation, the City Council budgeted an expenditure of $400,000 in Housing and Community Develops--nt Block Grant funds to initiate the physical development improvements to this area. The Koledo Lane demonstration proj- ect component of these improvements is now ready to commence. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached plan for the Koledo Lane demonstration project improvements to the Oakview neighborhood as shown in the budget below and authorize the Department of Public Works to commence preparation of engineering drawings and to solicit the services of a landscape architect. ANALYSIS: The Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program identified several types of , physical improvements which could occur in the Oakview area. Subsequent to the publication of the Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program, Oakview has become an adopted redevelopment project area which will make available further financial resources to implement this program. To commence this comprehensive improvement to the Oakview area, a one-block segment of Koledo Lane has been selec-ed as a "demonstration project" to exhibit the types of physical improve- ments which might occur throughout the neighborhood. In line with this, plans for the specific nature of the physical improvements with- in the remonstration project have been prepared and are submitted to the Council for consideration at this time. Specifically, the public improvements within this area include closure of a segment of Koledo Lane and the provision of additional open space, improvement to the alleys surrounding the area, and the widening of the alleys between Oak Street and Jaquelyn to compensate for the loss of through traffic on Koledo Lane. This concept has been presented to the property owners within the area and, through repeated meetings with these property owners, broad support for these physical improvements has been evidenced. The specific nature of these improvements and the proposed budget is as follows: I Plo 4181 i i . reconstruct allays surrounding area (with rolled S 92,000 curb on side) • remove street improvements on Koledo 13,000 . provide parking areas 60,000 . new landscape and irrigation 32,000 . relocate utilities 10,000 . additional lighting 6,000 . widen and improve alley (Oak Street to Jacquelyn) 60,000 SUBTOTAL $ 273,000 10% CONTINGENCY 27,300 $ 500,300 . engineering, testing and landscape architect fees 25TIN5000 TOTAL HCO BUDGET $ 400,000 While it is not possible to ascertain the exact cost of the planned improvements in the Koledo Lane demonstration project until bids are received, based upon the estimates above, the funds currently budgeted from the City's Housing and Conmunity Development Block Grant Program are adequate. It is important to note additional substantial improvements are also planned for the privately-owned properties within the project area and these improvements in- clude rehabilitation of the existing apartment units, provision of new garages and laundry rooms and, at the owner's option, construction of one additional apart- ment unit above the new garage. } It is intended that the design of these public and private improvements will address the most frequently expressed needs within the neighborhood of increased open space, increased security (the entire complex will be fenced with entry gates at the planned t parking bays), and elimination of the open carports. It is also important to note that the City's participation in the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program will help assure that the planned improvements to Lhe existing rental units in the demon- stration project area will not result in large scale displacement of low and moderate income tenants now residing there. Through the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program, and with the cooperation of the County's Housing Authority, eligible tenants of newly rehabilitated units will be eligible for rent assistance and will not be required to pay more than 30 percent of the household's gross monthly income for rent. This program also acknowledges the owner's participation in the rehabilitation effort by allowing a higher "fair market rent" for these newly rehabilitated units. So, while rents ma)- increase slightly to amortize the additional debt incurred by the rehabilita- tion loan, those tenants benefiting from the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Pro- gram may, in fact, pay less for rent by virtue of the availability of Federal sub- sidies. s Staff is also pursuing mechanisms to generate tax exempt financing through the Redevelopment Agency to provide owners with below market interest rates to con- duct the rehabilitation. The specifics of these tax exempt financing mechanis+-so will be the subject of a subsequent RCA. Aparoval of the physical development concept for the Koledu Lane demonstration project within the Oakview redevelopment project area will permit the necessary engineering and landscape architect work to commence immediately. FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. department of Housing and Urban Development; Housing and Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program. CWT:SVK:Jb �i ;I 'I I I ^'Y 660 MALYS►)'; Or PRIMIAINnrZY rLAN Thn urnpnsrd,Rrarvt Innment Plnn for the Onkview R(,Jr�vclnvmrnt Project is lionrd on the Prelimininry :--lun rind is in conformance with thn City's u0noted C;nnerai Plan, as amended to dntp, i,:onformance to thn standni•dr, contained in the Preliminary Plan for the Oakview ReO•rvelnpment Project Area will materially contribute toward the eliminatf , of blight and Its causes. Through the encouragement of modern, attractive, economically feasible development in conformance with the Generr:l Plan and construction of needed public Improvements, new jobs will be created both short-term and tong-term, additional housing 1 may be provided, public uses will be expanded and economic growth will be realized. Building intensities and potxilation densities wall be in conformance with state and local codes, thus correcting any code violations that may exist within the Project Area. As j discussed in greater detail In the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this Project, the neighborhood impact on the project area, and on the community as a whole, over the long-term, should be positive, although short-term negative impacts caused by the ' Inconvenience of relocation, increased truck traffic and dust during construction cannot ' be avoided if the Project is to be implemented. !` 7.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PANNING COMMISSION On September 0, 1902, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission rpvlewed and approved the Environmental Impact Report on the nakview Redevelopment Plan, and made the ! finding that the Redevelopment flan Is consistent with the General Pian and recommended Agency apornval. The Resolutian No. 1297 of the Planning Commission is �. attached hereto as Appendix A and made a part of thiQ report to Council on the Redevelopment Plan. 0.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA rOMMITrEE i Section 33305 of the California Community Redoveloornent Law requires the legislative body of a city or county to call upon the residents and existing community organizations In a redevelopment project area to form a Project Area Committee whenever the proposed project Is expected to result in the displacement of a substantial number of low and moderate Inr.ome families. Since it Is anticipated that implementation of the proposed Onkview Redevelopment Plan will not result in substantial resid;ntial displacement, a Project Area Committee was not formed. 9.0 REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 65402 OF GOVERNMENT CODE The Agency may acquire real prnrerty within the Redevclopmen: Project Area for streets In order to provide adequate on-site circulation within the Project Area as necessary for new development in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. All such acquisitions for Public purposes shall be consistent with the City's adopted General Plan, as amended to date and as may be amended in the future. Furthermore, the Agency does not Intend to acquire any real property within the Project Area unless such acquisition Is essential to accomplishing the underlying objective of the Redevelopment Plan, which is to eliminate r.. 7 ; r f'1 Taxes, as defined in Sertion 33670 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, shall not be divided and shall not be allocated to the Agency in excess of $350,000 annually during thn lifetime of the Redevelopment Plan, except by amendment of the Plan. No loans, advances or indebtedness to finance in whole or In part the rledpvelonment Project, and to be repaid from the allocation of thorn s taxes described in the before-mentioned Section 33670, shall be established or !acurred by the Agency beyond twenty (20) years from the date of adoption of the Plan by the City Council, unless such time limitation is extended by amendment of the Plan. However, such loans, advances or Indebtedness may be repaid over a period of .time longer than such time limit. Without an amendment of the plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness which the Agency shall have o,.,`standing at any one time shall not exceed $3,500,000. 4.2 Tax Increments All taxes levied upon taxable property within the houndaries of the Redevelopment Project each year, by or for the benefit cf the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district or otter public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date -of the ordinance approving the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area, shall be divided as follows: A. That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the -1 tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Redevelopment ' Project Area, as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation; of such property by such taxing agency last equalized prior to the Affective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and, when Collected, shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes by or for ! ' taxing agencies on all other vrooerty are paid (for purpose: of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agecies which did not include the territory of the Project Area on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory is annexed or otherwise Included after such effective date, the assessment roll of the County of Orange last equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used In determining the assessed valuation of the taxable Property in the Project Area on said effective date); and 3. That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and, when colle,,Aed, shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to piy'the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or Indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or in part this Redevelopment Project. Unless and until the total assessed value, of the taxable property In the Project Area 'vxceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in 5 X , I A. Apprnxt ztcly one-fourth of the units to this area (p rticuiar.y along Koledn 1-anc, Garton Orive and Mandrrll Orive) do not meet the currrnt provisions of the Building Svcurity sections of the C:ity's Municipal rodr whirh require encinsed parking ghrnges for multiple dwellings. Many of these. same units gin tint meet current off-street parking requirements v.ith respect to the number of roacrs per dwelling unit. Many of the anartmeni.; also do not have private npon space for individual units as currently required in the City's zoning ordinance. Mnny of the structures in the area Orr dclapidated with unkept yards, old curbs and sidewalks and broken windows. 13. The condition of structures, economic disuse and lock of capital improvements make the oroverty unsuitable for development by private enterprise acting alone. These negative conditions can only be dealt with by the positive powers of a redevelopment agency. A more detailed description of each of the conditions contri'juting to growing blight in the area follow. 3.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures The Oakview Neighborhood is one of transition and improvement. Numerous structures are in need of minor rehabilitation. Some of tt, ' buildings are in need of major rehabilitation and removal. The Ocean View Elementary School has been so!d as surplus, has been subjected to arson, is boarded and is presently having a substantial blighting influence on the adjacent neighborhood. The condition of buildings and structures is illustrated in the photographs attached as Exhibit A. The unattractive appearance of many cf the structures and the amount of debris indicate �..� adverse living conditions within portions of the project aren. 3.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values The; lack of capital improvements (discussed further below) is having an adverse effect on property values within tho project arec. The condition of the Ocean View Elementary School site is hovirig an adveme effect on the property values In the adjacent neighborhood. 3.3 Lnck of Public Improvements Accot•aing to the Land Usa Element Amendment 60-2 (page 40), n portion of the Onkview Area water improvements is in need of general upgrading and is now only adequate for domestic use (sue Exhibit 13). As evidenced it the Assessor's rnrcel Maps (Exhibit C) and the photographs (Exhibit A), thi, area is lacking adequate right-of-way and necessary curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lights. 3.4 Floodinr, ' Because of the lack of necessary streets, the area is .objected to inadequate drainage. After rein storms it takes months for water to fully evaporate. With neighborhood watering some puddles become safety and health hazards. i 3 I f pr 1.0 INTRODUCTION ) This report to the City Council of the City of Huntingtoo Beach on the Redevelopment 1 Plan for the Oakvivw Redevelopment Project is prepared mrsuant to the California ! Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code, Section 33352, which states: 1133352. Every redevelopment Plan submitted by the agency to the legislative body ! small ire accompanied by a report containing: � (a) The reasons for the selection of the orniuct area. (h) A desr_riotinn of the physical, social and econoric conditions existing in the area. (c) The orovosed method of financing the redevelopment of the project area In sufficient detail so that the legislative body may determine the economic feasibility of the plan. (d) A method or plan for ttre relocation of families and persons to be temporarily or permanently displaced from housing facilities In the project area, which method or plan shall include the provision required by JCCUL)n 33411.1 that no persons or families of low and moderate income shall be disvlac�:d unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their j lisp'acerrrent. i (e) Ar analysis of the preliminary plan. ! (f) The report and recommendations of the Planning Commission. (g) The, summary referred to in Section 35307 (Project Area Committee Meetings).* (h) The report required by Section 6540Z of the Government Coda (real property activities in conformance with the City's adopted General Plan).* (i) Tho report required by Section 21151 of the Public Resources Code. (Environmental Impact Report).* (j) The report of the county fiscal officer as required by Section 33370. (An analysis of assessed valuations, identifying taxing agencies and revenues to each taxing agency effected by the Redevelopment Project).* (k) The report of the t7iscal Review Curnmitten, if nny. (1) If the project Oren contains low or moderate income hour ing, n neighborhood impact report which describes in detail the impact of the project upon the residents of the oroject area ant] the �vrrounding nrcas in terms of relocation, traffic circulation, environmental quality, availability of community facilties and services, effect on school po[nrlaLLc n and quality of education, property ! assessments rind taxes, and other matters affecting the physical and social quality of the neighborhood. *Wording within parenthesis not part of direct quote. I ! SECTION APPENDIX A - HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION APPENDIX B - COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT APPENDIX C - TAXING ENTITIES RESPONSES APPENDIX 0 - LEGAL NOTICE AND BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS APPENDIX E - FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX F - DOCUMENTATION OF BLIGHT REPORT i �. i t . I i • t } i • t 1 f TABLE OF CONTENTS a► SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTIOfi 1 2.0 REASONS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE PROJECT AREA 2 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PHYSICPL, SOCIAL AND ECONCMIC 2 CONDITIONS EXISTING IN THE AREA 3.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures 3 3.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values 3 3.3 Lack of Public Improvements 3 3.4 Flooding 3 3.5 Increased Crime Rates 4 3.6 Increased Fire Rates 4 4.0 FINANCING THE PROJECT 4 4.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing 4 Method '1 4.2 Tax Increments 5 4.3 Other Loans and Grants 6 4.4 Financial Feasibility 6 5.0 METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF' FAMILIES OR PERSONS 6 6.0 ANALYSIS OF PRELIMINARY PLAN 7 7.0 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 7 8.0 REPORT AND RFCOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA 7 COMMITTEE l 9.0 REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 65402 OF GOVERNMENT CODE 7 10.0 ENVIRO.*1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT 8 11.0 COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT 8 l 12.0 FISCAL REVIEW REPORT 9 13.0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT 9 14.0 ANALYSIS OF. THE COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT AND 10 CONSULTATIONS WITH EACH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCY } EXHIBIT "A" REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 i 3 1 �,.���. iG e..t:...�v.i................._.... .. ...... _._......._. .,.......-. ....... i... _.. ...-...... .._...._. .-.�......�..«.�nvvr�wacRtx�.::'.i:'ti.i�F L:w�Y�.�� I 1 STAFF Of CAIt;Otit:fA -_.-• STATE "rJARD OF ELTU;:L14ATIO?i___� clolcc 1. Ftfltr Idle D r'r;rr. Sun 110"O•c3 1 STRUT, SACR%MEW.O, CAM09NIA W•151 1. C100:Tr131,30, 14. OX 1797. SACAdf.'.WO. CAMOAN1A 95803) U'�Loi.eS : , ]Cl�': ttv A D„r'.u,S.a Wepa 916) 322"2323 M".10Ar,M.IINNUI 1 1 Tf.irJ G"'*,r, San Itola,I I VCHA►D N(VINS • � Klr:N1111 CC1Y C?. 11 Co�rroGn,Saaemr+ra Paz C:UGlAS D.Ekll iir. Victor A. Hein. Irrar,r;.r Seurrorr �)rcn�r� County Auditor-Ccntroller CITY OF NIIHrIrJGrOf�y BEACH n F. 0. Do:: 5��7 c�r.!!rrlsrf; r!vr OFFICE 30 Oflnta lrna, CA 92702 Dear li:•. Heim: Pu.-suant to Section 33328 et seq. of th'e 1!3rllth and Safety Code, the 1982.4,2 assessed values of state•-nsses3ed prop-arty located within th.: butardaries cf the prop:cid Oal:vse, F%odetielop..T.::nt Project thu Cit of i'tuntington Enach are s1wai ::•:lor:;. A separate tabulation lists tFz land and, improver.:;•ntz outside the project area but %ith3n 300 feet from th,-, vouncLnrics of ti:.p � , project area. �-.✓' The:.e n_,:;�=;ed values T.d1Z continuc to be v:l•;d if tbo •project boundaries remain , fi::ed quid the ordin=ce arr. l,:_n/_ r ro.• e .e +, rM� fi .. rr. 1 <<pp_r ,ind th t c.1.t lorr r.L plan a:i or this pro,nct, beco•"05 effective, prior to ,tu,ust• 20, 1.983. I , , I:TPA liIiJ PROJECT 11 .2•-5 Assessed Valuesi 3 1ns:-rnt•.c�Aren Crmn.-InN, L-Ind Imrrov.:r•;.•nts Pei 1 4010 So. Calif. Edison Co. 9.11020 So. Calif. Gas Co. 1,21920 Gen. Tel. Co. of Calif. 781,090 Total 9151U.3U iiT IM ?03' rrRiiiETrER 4010 Go. Calif. Edicon Co. 131,323 So. Cn 1 i f. Gns Co. 31,em 1 G-:-n. Co. of Calif. 491,00 f P,1-C. Tel. 7,01•cC. Co. Total Uc�,7,57C Vary trot y ;;our,, JE11:do :11i:ilnistrator cc: Vr. Char? sh:�.m�;; W. "' psna V,tI.t1`:l"I�•:i JI:iS�,Oi•J Yccuti:^_ I?ircr:tur Hun;in;•�:_,: i'. .�ci1 fi:;,dfi •el.op%^,:l4 Agency r, i TABLE V -- HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (G) CITY OF HUNTINGTON I3EACII 6AK'VIM-1 PROJEt„ REPORT OF 1982-83 ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET . f f Secured Assessed Value - Local Roll $36,761,912 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 1,793,207 Tonal Assessed Value Within 300 Feet $38,555,119 C II * fiat Available At This Time i r,e CITY OF H11NTIN TON BENCH WJ 0 •,LV INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HuwTP&TON/IACH To Alicia M. Wentworth From Tom Tincher, Director City Clerk Business & Industrial Enterprise Subject FISCAL IMPACT REPORTS FOR MAIN-PIER, Date October 6, 19B2 YORKTOWN-LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH PROJECTS 4- tit x! Attached are the Fiscal Impact Reports for each of the above named projects. These reports should be inserted as Appendices "B" in the "Reports to the City Council". TTdb attachments i I A A H UDI DITOR-CO`ISROLLF,R u N ry c> FINANCE ©JILpiNG ' 630 NORTH 011OADWAY v P. 0. DOX 567 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 s � � R^NOE SELFPHONFi 631.24S0 AREA CODE 714 j OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER September 23, 1982 SUr,iEcT: City of Huntington Beach Community Redevelopment Agency -'Oakview Project , I Pursuant to Section 33328 et seq. of the California health and Safety Code, you will fin•i enclosed your copy of the Fiscal Impact Report for the subject redevelopment agency. Further inquiries may be directed to the: County of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office Attention: Tax Section 630 N. Broadway P. 0. Box 567 Santa Ana, CA V2702-0567 �!% i Judy Gale i Accountant Tax Section JG:el Enclonures ! 1 i TABLE I - HEALTH 6 SAFETY - CODE 33328 (A) y CITY OF HUNTINGZ\014 BEACH - 0AKVIM1 PROJECT 1982-83 BASE YEAR ASSESSMENT ROLL Secured As.essed Value - Local Poll $25,766,693 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll G33,505 Total Assessed Value Within the Project $26,400,198 1 * Not Available At This Titac TABLF. II - HEALTH SAFETY CCDG 33320 (A) CITY OF HUNTINGTON DEACir - OAt:V m-i PROJECT REPORT OF IDEUTIFICATION OF TAXING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE PROJECT The Dist_ice numbers and the taxing agencies' names are: 001E County Inside Excluding CSFP (County General) , 054A Huntington Beach City 3000 ;oast Community College College Dist. - Dasic Area 310A Huntington beach Union lligh sc)iool District 3138 Ocean View School District - Ha:,fc 600A school Modification Aid (Dept. of Ed.) 601A School Institution 'Fulton Tax (Dept. of Ed.) 707A Orange County Transit District 710A Orange County Flood Control District 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches 6 Parks Di:.trice. t 799A Orange County Vector Control Dist. t 020P I-LID-Pro,1 C - Remainder Area 863D MWDOC - Original Area 918A Orange County Sanitation District 43 960A Orange County Water District 961A Orange County Water District - Water Reserve I I I I } TABLE III - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (C) i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BENCH - 0A.KVIEW PROTECT REPORT OF 1982-83 BASE YEAR REVEDWE £AC:i DISTRICT f CAN EMPECT FROM WITHIN THE PROJECT Bonded Basic Levy Indebtedness Total Fund Dist. Agency :Iame+- Revenue Revenue 82-83 Revenue 0049-0: 054A Huntington Beach City $ 50,469.91 $15,124.94 $ 65,594.85 0072-16 e20P t r'D-.r4'DOC - Re-mainder Area - 4,402.70 4,402.70 , 0075-01 863b• M•IDOC - Original Area -- - - 0100-03 001E Orange County 39,716.58 113.97 39,830.55 229Z-01 600A Deparent a� EdLcation 3,243.73 - 3,243.73 4001-01 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 6,76L•.00 627.77 7,395.S5 1051-01 713A Orange County harbors, Beaches & Parks Dist. 4,417.52 - 4,417.52 5331-01 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 1,134.67 - 1,134.67 5881-01 960A Orange County rater Dist. 1,057.61 - 1,957.61 y 5901-01 961A Orange County Stater ?gist. - t-later Reserve 29.36 - 29.3v 7141-01 310A Huntington Beach Union 11. S. Dist. 55,357.31 2,097.73 57,455.04 7311-01 300B Coast Co=untiy College Dist. 23,385.93 - 23,385.93 6431-01 313B Ocean View School Dist. - Basic 67,429.05 28,747.44 96,176.49 9041-01 9Z8A Orange County Sanitation Dist. =3 9,599.19 14.41 9,613.60 5321-01 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 492.84 - 492.84 TRA TOTAL $264,001.98 *51,128.96 V"315,130.94 1 II ' 1 I's .ABLE IV - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (D) w , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -- OARVID7 PROJECT REPORT OF TOTAL AD VALOREM REVENUE EACH DISTRICT HAS AVAILABLE FROM WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE PROJECT I The revenue data necessary to complete this section of the Fiscal Review Report does not currently exist because of the impact of Assembly Bill 8. An inordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Auditor-Controller's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Report does not contain the total Ad Valorem Revenue information for the project area. There has been included, however, a sulplemental table of comparative assessed values for each taxing dietrirt to give a relative indication of Base Year Revenue percei.tage given up to the CRA. See Table IV(D) , Supplement. l ' ' I i I 1 � I • li TABIX IV - HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE 33328 (D) SUPPLEMENT CITY OF HU14TINGTON BEACH - OMMEW PROTECT . REPORT Or BASE YEAR. 1982-83 CRA A.V. PERCENTAGE P.SLATIONSHIP TO TOTAL TAXIM; DISIPTCT'S A.V. Taxing District's Percent of A.V. Within the Taxing District's Pzaject AV Agency Name Project A.V. - County-aide to District i 0015 County Inside Excluding CSF'P (County General) $26„00,198 $49,736,868,136 .0531 054,A Huntington Beach City 26,400,198 5,883,904,006 .4487 300a Coast Cosnrc:nity College Dist. - Basic Are: 26,400,198 16,762,650,086 .1575 310A Huntington Beach union High School Dist. 26,400,198 9,172,131,692 .2876 313E Ocean View School Dist. - Basic 261-+00,198 2,627,919,928 1.13046 6QcA School Modification Aid (Dept. of Education) 26„00,198 70,394,280,4G3 .0375 601A School institution Tuition Tar. (Dept. of Education) 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,260,403 .0375 710A Orange Count, Flood Control Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches & Parks Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 26,400,198 70.377,060,051 .0375 P20P I AID-M., DOC - Remainder Area iMetrcpolitan t:ater) 26,400,198 f 48,708,913,761 .0542 b'033 Municipal t:ater Dist. Orange County - Original Area 2G,400,198 48,66E.757,603 .0542 916A orange County Sanitation Dist. 43 29,144,296 15,408,800,441 -IS9i Orange County Water Dist. 26,400,198 47,3Ga,33S,536 .0557 2GiA Orange County Water Dist. - hater Reserve 26,400,198 46,989,210,975 .0562 one percent 1.0000 E i , M TABLE VI - HEAM11 G SAFETY CODE 33320 (E) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - OAKVIEW PROJECT REPORT OF AGENCY'S REVEME IN FIRST YEAR I i �j The Auditor-Controller has been advised by the Huntington I Beach Community Redevelopment Agency that no major stru,.tures , and in,paovements will be made within the Project boundaries during the first year, so therefore we anticipate a conser- vative growth in value of the a tea within the Project boun- daries to increase by only 5.7 percent. Total 1982-83 Base Year Revenue $315,130.94 Total Expected Percentage Increase in Value 5.7% 1983-84 Increment Tax Revenue Estimate S .17,962.46 i i I • .I r • i TABLE IV - HEALTH 5 SAFETY CCDE 33328 (F) CITY OF HUNTINGTON PEACH - OAKVIEW PROJECT I REPORT OF ASSESSED VALUATIC:I BY BLACK WITHIN THE PROJECT I, I i s health and Safety Code, Section 33328 (f) requireds: "The assessed valuation of the project area, by block for the preceding five years; except for state assessed property on the board roll." The assessed valuation data necessary to complete this seztion of 0-a Fiscal Review Report does not exist because the valuation files maintained by the County do not contain Astorical assessed values b'y block. An inordinate manual I affort and expense would be required of the County Assessor's and County .Auditor's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore; the Fiscal Review Report_ does not contain i the preceding five-year assessed valuation information for , cite project area. r � TABLE V - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (G) CITY OF IIUIITTN,TOII I3EACII -- OALVIEWa PROJECT REPORT OF 1982-83 ASSESS%D VALUATION OF PROPERTY WIT:IIN 300 FEET Secured Assessed Value - Local Roll $36,761,912 State Board of Equali-zation - Public Uti)ity Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 1,793,207 i Total Assessed Value Within 300 Feet $38,555,1.19 i1 1 * ' Not Available At This Tine I I ' r r...ts • STATE Of CA1.109MA olo;u STATE rl-OARD OF ELOUALIZATION v,4f. !a v s(ILLY V. n 1ouhta- 1020 N SIRW, SACPAV.ENTO, CAMORMA ). VVNIA130. 111 I (P.O. 101. 1799. SACNAMINIO, CA1110'RUIA 02051 1082 !Cgc'd 5cn WrJ3 (916) 322-2323 Mtd 5311 ROW !.W116 D41141. ?Q19d9A13 ILINNIN CC#Y TC0n1'01.*Cf'54oarm'"I'l IP22 VOUGIAS 0.btil Wir. Vivictor A. HOL"r, M r.0,04p Y OF IIUNTMGTON BEACH Crange County Auditor- 'w Ccnro1l-.,r F. 0. Do:t 567 OFFICE 30 Santa Am., CA 927C2 Dear 1.1'r. Heim: Pun-suant to Section 33328 et neq. of Uc 112alt1i and Safety Codc, "ba 1c,8241-11 assessed values of ctnte—ssc3iied pro-n-Ly locatod the th! piop.,cd Oakmiew Project ;.-WI in th.s City of H.umfinrtcn Ee.%ch ore cLwai A oeparat-,� talc-ulati,-::i lists ti.- lmd --,!,,d outside the project area, but 30,C) feet from coun(L-rius of projuct. area. Theze az:,,.,ssed valuec v.-III continu: to 1b..-.1 valid if thc project L-ound�rios remain fi-ned and the '-")p'-ov311(; thc.: X-C plan for t1us p:'0141Pct bocoxc:3 el'.fectivj prIA-cr Lu Au,;u3t, 20, 15,93. 117MIT'N 19c`22-93 Assessed Values -rnit, Aen Crmmm, L-Ind F&r�Cnal 4-010 So. Cnlif. E-d-tion Co. 91,020 So. calit•. Gas Co. 1,21920 Ocn. Tel. Co. of Calif. 761,090 Total 915,U3-0— ..1'Ni-IN' ".ff)' F,-:RT,'-'qETER 11010 .in. 0"IlLf. Co. 131,320 " Q* '). C".1if. Ciao Co. 33.1890 G.,n. Ts-L. Co. of Calif. 4-9111i30 Total 659070 vl!ry traly youx- JE11:dc P.,-c n G A( ,Oxistrat or cc; ?-'r. Charle:; 1-11. Thompson VALU-WX:i DMSI, ,'.' Agcncy +r.r err ire.r. IV7'tIF. �j Superior Court qrlw 01'My, , STATF:OFCALIFOHNIA f�(�+j tl S��' �t + �' In and for the County of Orange J � CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ? 1'110iIF OF Ill 111L(t•ATItIN CITY CLERK JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WMBCF A Jam F=XwtiALReoi By"M ary WUNC>li.arm after N �UILMNr�ACSMC't ON TIM 1'Milloa D Win titetr of(.'efifornia I tiaeb Y +.e ad CT+CIr�O+��Gg�q�r��Ha�tirAM3 Ersi� ('ountyol(lrnntr 1"" Giol ai �paeaibt2a,law C+tseiCrewreraat7tbit ll l stit70t�ldeb Strut.!IuattaCtaa tr<.ttr.Glihrrit HtY w tM�lae.ix r� IeMttti b JEANNIE L. THOMAE IteidbytrtOtyC"kalendtrt it4"'qu IdX,u d Ne rr ••await irw�'t�.l 't� I!r�tpAye�no state Wtae t3q eppeorrr ad That I am and nt nil time,h:trin ntenfront•d wn+a citir••rt.,I *jaw I jwpter dW�a {rlY}t � Pttwrr the Iinitetil titrtr+,Purr the"tr of lweott oar>t nr+.and th tt I L�'btR�l1ate"afeMltJ A fr ulYligs I am not a party to.nor intere,te•tl in the alkwe rotitled rnarter• sAytuve b torah hr/ewe errs,,&a0wtrtwo� Oval I Am the principal rlerk of the printrr of the end a`0Mroop rev I TSO"Port a W A�rte7�b tit Qt7 Qaad a W ptepw 4 FWnideotaNt Vim r Mtt�tdtt.ltrt b 1p he ra�et ari rMtiad"M tiaa 9 iM HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. PEV . W cl.- w- ..rOrrAra.1%a ofwarwrkmw Rolm Cr..,iw I all. a newepa lie r of trnrtaI circulation,puhIi,hed in thr t'ity of 1' yeti- WMtdlayar4faW.ISL11/�W=W + HUNTINGTON BEACH 4MR. � �4 Owl At time A—VAW dap.lore lard pkm oC rw++r bsters top diadem a sM pt'Pptrt'd ft�ae/i patent►Ls Chi W� tiI pe(r pawik�y County of Orange and which ner+npaixt i+ puhli,hrd [o, tht• 1rfePe lllt►�� Ire t'xrtor' sew aw■ape t1w aprllQ diterninalion of liral nrw*and intrIbirrrin•of a ernerel i hArm �1teadetrfiodt At aa7 tzar Pot War trw tie F+ts�thReaW rt In In aw H� ter, and which newspaper at all tittle, hecrin tnenti.mr•d had a Ito fnprrt ihtdettthpant T%1k 11W!Ib b emt:et 11M Cvq(aot4t 0 and still has a hone ride sutwriptirn li,t of 1)oine+ulmorrti.en, e:abttorrt it r!e t b tit Atin+Npolis �laa M Iww et end which newspaper haA frt•en e.tahlirhrd,printed anti pall bt'a w klandaizR a16rbori tW ( i rtfeewrid bow Ora dteerrti b haar W pb r�p�i iA art�w ecal linhed at regular intenal+ in the Paid Cooniv of Ornntr for to elltttiorabtra Pits period etcredinC one vrAr; that tl•i notice. of which the �t'� ' Petra&! (Pnl+X Ioul" annexed i, n printed n+pv, hn, turn puhli.hrd in the n•tufAr ad am in>wb�+ N tltr I �' �" 'tar tptitl ip00i.4iaLtqulf.F�ttfaw dYPrtd�Cailfarlir07lis end entire iaeur of"aid new,tpnper.and nol in ah+ •up{drmetst Nrt7Prgmtlrrw.fMttM«rorlesgt in 6yys thereat,on the fullowint dntr..►o wit: K"1 a W AaricitPdka RuM+_ � Wb 17 w A�erep IYeuiie�ait Ore doer Vat.MeO�*wW■e( iAA ytar+rA n P" A�Ilvei�l�7r aYly No ti"iK� Tee baadrt+e of tae I4"Prow KoderekSttew Pru in a/dta-A Is 1t",, S E P T E MB E R 9 P 16 P 2 3 P 30 P 1982 'A".Sol A.tl lone: !Ar(I It Ff M)k OAKVIEt1'ABRA FAOJiCr tad ptrtinr"anee t4 r 8"11s.Kay"it W"111100 lq&ly Bova MCI@ ad Nr Moci/US 50k%CUI ur WWWWO DWAL 11, 0S OWIA 8t0a d C.F3rraie.an el"M eo A rasp taeer4td W st, WAI 1I d A Ak wow Map it W(Y.+n of W t tnat7 Nratdw downed K 944iii I . iietlnalr at W I"air+ WAt Ioe+nrt d&talc Uti{ae thm OVA 0 AV, t1'1 r wNt aai it MI is!t I aft Is do�oeWr.��wial0gfn Mf t1•P eft Ilse d Knbn i Ott%a vn at MId b!hd b rNtl•.so fM IkAtt afjt ei ems,a" I trrtiry lur deelarel under{wnnit% .J 1h.tt the 6aia1 LO,07lvr pdetddtatnbsFluxahtyIdl►� {rim inti•Wit,Anti t'urrrct. tLJd+r a6•(: ead60GgtYW/atarllII1111 RraarL�l�ae1SkOmb Ip(«t Bore&side of mft4hw,Otrww Beats At d¢.7.1'a1r9��W I{ulT ftK 1%a O rd a t....G A R D EN..G R O.V E. .. alaett raid ewth fiat to The tat►tr ve T"d IW►4XI:&hare wj tend twat tit !oath 0 t1•3t"Ww17W tad In W onli Fin d 71rtt s Mow&bq MG rwtlt Herd ID tly!Pit'Katz ti10 Gant(.1 iat0i6e¢�I atBtl- st tiara. ,t ti:i ita'e_ M Ila1c}way Arta i>�rtt t1G hA N Mdtr.>N/leM atsMr rLb MaiktYttt f 1ifornia,thi,15t...,arof.00T.,..1y.82 liner+ne►taaart•N'N"�tladLtMtrlg/dd1�oasr�t�Ia�a"Nfic'"A ` 1 tiff d 0 Latw eat err wlbrb", Wai b a rift/}tnift)wttb am so 1*4 slam A--.4 At r&W4*fna the asWlW d Wm*11eueer{UWLM saw i aratld am 14-11A a 111t W,1/'!'iet 33m hd to"won d Oate►�F�, ............ ....C7'•..... L C7 t T.c�- >.__. .xre/t llsoly In(wt Its vid`W,a%d 0"K3e ri oral*@%1"bova sun riit nat+r!�t llottY 9 day(b'I('fart IN M+k t>etwt Op"IN"In Sign ni urr ��+'•etrr►a►��tiv tAi•�'11•Gt>�ftK:tMtxr C+ettia t9�!1'py'iYlr1� twC lrmrollatN 0•.i�,1i'1/" IM hPt b tin aretAp tr>Irswart o!W ilur ltB1t tlwxa ayq t Iae'Jr ltr0 fltttltA lU4t31'Mtat t±%/fwt k 00$ett l(a a)!Ab a eorad Wes,dO kK b IW salt vow two d Pas-,f— :ut�A�r,a{*�t�1w }a kO Atiossis*�errii too twtbAM�arty� rtrAbeaMta4v&Iris a a*ttaftN%d If Eli i3'IP is t1n 7Waa t1�k70 ftri b i }oist ea a rr,aen etrtre tecr Oster r t d Oil APM.r&raw F"boom itmth Q rio*tpt"Ii t't1s..I�' t.tttn t a�Kri t too 1111411 fait ere r twee tsttw iiexi�w�neiii'i kl� natWitott,NprlM6M.sf++1lClttlp Ix'7tt`ItoktYootts,7lrMftost+dwtM �a+tA++ctVelf Ord rwlerb�a It*LPII t(A d14 II'3V'.es see�y�d �tt41 f�� ) ird �eye Rf dot N ritd►ip hK e.w � ehstgpqL��.�yy►et�t i mor.ett..tt0Von a" rtl ft"b"w an ofw trolfi slat��I�y1Me tat!fro of water rM rd ttii wertMsei erdrw freteesaK.ser6 t�artlseeycl dt7 I t old l~0 Eirtsteeo d 31 t. aid paint ran lseth sl itt.!r Ott"tr.hraiat WR a radW is • &rid"rem area Iotrebatet.P Owt li jO'my&Ant a rtateei.,•&fit d II7 7s• sort 41ALM d Y tog to t fete tr tb a"ate 1{f f;thrte atraK.,w. Ii n fte+A s der :r 7i`w{I3 ; rwt to Ore Owe tittP N tract uiJt tlrrrw airs Wi.aet k,u Aw11,0 11'it•lLtt aoo rent:tftenea:btrtr N daE 31'Is"Yrrt !& an UW vm Laq� fthertnt&&piss said Peg Gar uA hn rMlutb 1VA>f*K Weavartr CRY fluadnrAts date R✓" R.HvaflKMt 8et9 AJCrtutan�l►�.7� t Gt7Aiedertraitt, at,otllte■tittw e/Ia t &sae ehe officer.month f to p4ftt CM*OFH NTL%MupjBFACH Pry 4 Cf.K2if�8�0PP1C6j111►6kt.= Hurt.W •tad,Mom.t]0610 ' t I 7//C 093 es LEGAL NOTICE 1134) NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY 01: THE PROPOSED OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington: Beach, California, and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency have set October 4, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. as the time, and the Council Chambers of the City Hall , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 as the place for a joint public hear- ing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to consider the approval and adoption of the proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan. The Agency will implement the adopted Plan it, after the joint public hearing, the City Council approves and adopts the proposed Redevelopment Plan. The purpose of the joint public nearing is to consider: 1. The Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Agency which proposes as its scope and objective to eliminate unsafe conditions, Improve overall appearance, encourage participation, encour?y;a new development, provide } needed public improvements and facilities, f; 2. The report or the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelop- I ment Plan includes, but is not limited to, tine report and recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission on the Plan and the report of the County Fiscal Review Committee (if any). 3. The Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Plan. 4. All evidence and testimony for and against the adopt! )n of the Redevelop- ment Plan. At the above stated day, hour and place, any and all persons having any objec- tions to the proposed Redevelopment Plan or to the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause shy the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan may file in writing with the City Clerk a statement of his objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Any person � ar organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. At the aforesaid hour the Council shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written and nral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. The proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report are now on file attd open for public inspection in the Office of the Director of Business and Industriai Enterprise, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. } Every property owner, business or tenant interested in becoming a participant, Pursuant to the Participation Rules adopted by the Agency, should submit to the Agency a completed "Statement of Interest to Participate" within sixty (60) days from the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Agency. The boundaries of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are as defined in Exhibit "A", as follows: 'A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT That portion of Section 26, Townshi.p 5 ;south, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Polsa Chica and the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of 'California, as st•awn on a map recorded in Book 51., page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County RecordeA described as follows: h corner of said aec_ion 26 thence Beginning at the past one-quarter o ..r , g ng � South 890 24 ' 16" .West 463.11 feet to a point on the southerly pro- longation of the east line of Keelson Lane, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline, said point being the True Point or Beginning; thence along said southerly prolongation South 00 45' 06" East 40 feet to the south line of Slater Avenue, a street 80 feet in width, 40 feet either side of centerline; thence South 890 24 ' 16" West 1187 feet along said south line to the west line of: Tract No. 4091; thence along said west line North 00 44 ' 31" West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 4091; thence along said north line North 890 24' 39" East 300 feet tc the southerly extension of the west line of Oak Lane, a street being 60 feat in width, 30 feet either aide of centerline; thence North 0" 44 ' 45" Vest 2011 feet; along said southerly extension, the west line of Oak Lane and its northerly extension to a line parallel with and 60 feet north measured at .right angles froin the centerline of Warner Avenue; thence: alone, said parallel line North 89' 25' 46" East 1386 feet to the � centerline of Beach Blvd. , said street being 132 feet in width, 66 feet either side of centerline; thence along said centerline South ' 1 00 45' 14" East 996 feet; thence South 0911 25' 00" West 283 feet; thence South 00 45' 14" East 298 feet; thence South 89" 25' 00" West 20 feet; thence South 0° 45' 14" East 96 feet to the easterly exten- sion of they north line of Tract No. 8916; thence along said north line South E90 .25' 00" West 576 feet to the east line of Ash Street, i a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said east line South 00 44 ' 46" East 100 feet to a curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 50 feet; thence along said carve southerly and southeasterly thru a central angle of 36° 52' 12" an arc distance of 32. 20 feet to a point on a reverse curve concave westerly having ,^ /lt) a radius of 50 feet, a radial from said point bears North 5211 23 ' 02" east; thence along said reverse curve southeasterly, southerly, and southwesterly thru a central angle of 780 54 ' 35" an arc distance of 68.86 feet to a compound curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35 feet, a radial to said point bears South 48° 42 ' 23" east; thence along said compound curve southwesterly and westerly thru a central angle of 400 ill 2311, an arc distance of 29.44 feet to a point on the south line of l•tandrell Drive being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of Centerline; thence along said south line south 890 29 ' 00" west 11.8 feet to the east line of tract No. 4301; thence along said mentioned east line South 00 44 ' 46" east 270 Feet to a point on a non--Tangent curve concave southwesterly h«ving a radius of 70 feet, said point being on the north line of Barton Drive and the east line of 'Queens Lane; thence along said curve and east line southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 770 441 59" an arc distance of 95 feet; thence South 00 44 ' 52" East 22 feet to a curve concave north- easterly having a radius of 70 feet; thence continuing along the east line of Queens Lane and said mentioned curve southerly and sout•heastr_rly thru a central angle of 270 38 ' 00" an arc distance of 34 feet to a reverse curve concave southeasterly havi.nq a radius of 130 feet, a radial to said point bears North &1' 37' 08" t.:ast; thence alone,; saicl reverse curve southeasterly and southerly thru a central angle of 27 , .: 38 ' 00" an arc distance of 63 feet to north line of Tract 4153; thence along said north line North 890 24 ' 35" last 125 feet to the east line of Tract 4153; thence along said east line Soutl, U° 44 ' 58" hasC 500 feet; thence North 890 241 16" East 197 feet to the cast line j of Keelson Lane; thence along said east line zinc] its southerly pro- longation 160 feet to the True Point of noLlinning. /S/ Alicia M. Wentworth Nty Clerk, Huntington ngton eac Ly Council Secretary, Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency /S/ Charles W. Tham son City m n strator, City of Huntington Reach Executive Officer, Huntington Beach Redevelopment "+gency DATED: 8/17/82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (714) 536-5227 I I REQUE.<.' FOR CITY COUNCI'ACTION Data Aug4s t 112 1982 Silbinitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY f:O GIL FVRED �D'BY Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator �, t9 PrepartJ by: Tom T;ncher, Director of Business and Industrialise �Ty rt.F 5ubjf~ct: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ADOPTION OF O � F�LELII PLAN AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING EIR weS-AS151 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we have completed, we are now in a posi- tion to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearing at which time the above namsd Oakview Redevelopment Plan and EIR will be considered for adoption and certification. RECO.-74ENDATION: Approve resolution setting a joint public hearing with the Redevelopment Agency for 7:30 p.m. , Monday, October 4, 1982. ANALYS!S: Redevelopment Law requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice rust be provided through a local newspaper at lEast once a Week for four consecutive weeks prior to the time at which the hearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August lb meeting if we are to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting dote until some time in the future. CWT:TT:jb g,n •i"a I Flo 4/81 REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Date August 11, 1982 ----�- co w Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment A cXrP zi 0vLJ) it L Submittedhy: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra Prepared by: .."om Tincher, Director of Business and ndust ial En .p Subject: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF OAKV-fE EDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING EIR 53 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we have completed, we are now in a posi- tion to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearing at which time the above named Oakview Redevelopment Plan and EIR will be considered for adoption and certification. RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution setting d joint public hearing with the City Council for 7:30 p.m. , Monday, October, 4, 1982. ANALYSIS: Redevelopment Law requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weeks prior to the time at which the hearing will be field. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at, the August 16 meeting if we are *to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. � • ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1 DeFer setting date until some time in the future. CWT:Tf:,jb ri Pin ciii 1 ,1 t Q E UES-r4 `OR CITY COUNCIL'�CTION R Date September 22, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 1fJ,,5 A't 0-4eb 10.4 f S4ibmlttedby: Charles W. Thompson, City AdminiOWN Isr, strato � J �_�-- � .E' Oyliv 111 l;1'1"i �:�,u;,•, t• ' Prepared by: �) Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Indu Lia Enterprise Subject: ADOPTION OF OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Statement of Issue. Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, the Huntington Beach City Council and Redevelopment Agency may hold a joint public hearing to consider pub- lic input prior to taking action on the Redevelopment Plan. After the staff re- port is presented and the public hearing is held, the City Council and Redevelop- ment Agency will have saveral actions which must be taken. Acting as the City Council you will be asked to consider adapting the attached resolution which approves and certifies the EIR and introduce the ordinance which adopts the Redevelopment Plan. Both of these matters will be considered after you have taken several actions in your capacity as the Redevelopment Agency. RECOMMENDATION: ', Approve and certify EIR and introduce ordinance. ANALYSIS: These actions represent the final steps in the long and complex process which must be undertaken to Lst-iblish a redevelopment project area. If the ordinance is introduced on October 4, 1982, it is anticipated that the second reading would take place on October 18, with the plep becoming effective 30 days thereafter. 4 .. ' ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing and introduce ordinance. j 2. Continue the public hearing for additional input. 3. Not adopt ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Environmental Impact Report 3. Ordinance 4. Redevelopment Plan CWT:TT:jb ; PIO 4181 ' REQUEST rOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION A 1 Date Sept gm er 22. 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency �f Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Office" // • Prepared by: �%n Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: TRANSMITTAL OF REPORT ON OAkVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CITi' COUNCIL #4W Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMEhi OF ISSUE: Prior to the public hearing on the proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan, you will be asked, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, to consider adopting the attached resolution which approves and transmits the "Report to the City Council" for the above named project. This report has been prepared pursuant to Section 33352 of the State of California Health and Safety Code. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolution. ANALYSIS: Section 33352 of the Health and Safety Code requires that every redevelopment plan submitted by the Redevelopment Agency to the legislative body (City Council) shall be accompanied by a report containing specific detailed information as set forth in said Section 33352. The attached document has been prepared pursu4nt to this requirement. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Report to the City Council CWT:TT:jb i I C/ PIO 4191 i 1 ` f p 1ne CITY OF HUNYINGTOPI Br.-ACH COUNCIL. - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION r. W To Honorable Mayor Robert Mandic From Charles W. ThompX and Council Members City Administrator i Subject FISCAL IMPACT REPORT: OAKVIEW Date October 4, 1982 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Earlier today we received correspondence from the State Board of Equalization which contained its report on the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. This in- formation supplemented that which we received from the County Auditor-Controller late last week and together comprise the total fiscal impact report. Because we had not received this information prior to the publishing of the agenda packet, t we are requesting that the materials be inserted as Appendix "B" of the "Report to the City Council on the Oakview Redevelopment Plan". This information replaces the letters previously received on this subject. CNT:TT:jb V. A. !•tetra . AUUITOE+CCNTRpLLC•.R C�►U NTY C]F fINANCF nVILgWG r �1, 1 $30 NORTH GROADWAr 1 J P.D. Box 357 SAh'TA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 s 3 Ft^N(3E ` i ' TELEPHONES •34-2430 , AREA CODE 714 - V OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER t i September 23, 1982 i � , I SUBJECT: City of Huntington Beach Corununity Pedevelopment Agency - Oakview Project Pursuant to Section 33218 et seq. of the California 11sualth and Safety Code, you trill find enclosed your copy of the Fiscal Impact Report for the subject redevelopment agency. Further inquiries may be directed to the: County of Orange Auditor-Controll,:rI5 �%cfice j Attention: Tax Section 630 N. Broadway r; P. U. Box 56'1 S;-nta Ana, Ch 92702-0567 i.I 11 Judy Gale °fir Accountant Tax Section JG:tl Enclosures 1 i TABLE I - HEALTH & SAFETY - CODE 3332F3 (A) w i / CITY OF HUNTINGTON BRACH - OARVIM1 PROJECT 1982--03 BASS YEAR ASSESSr-IENT ROLL Secured Assessed Value - Local Roll $25,766,693 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 633,505 i I Total Assessed Value Within the Project $26,400,198 * Not Available At This Time f II 1 I TABLE II - HEALTH 6 SAFETY CODE 33328 (P) q CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - OAKVIEW PROJECT REPORT OF IDENTIFICATION OF TAXING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE PROJECT jThe District numbers and the taxing agencies' names are: I 001E County Inside Excluding CSFP (County General) JI 054A Huntington Beach City 300D Coast Co=unity College College Dist. - Basic Area 310A Huntington Beach Union High School District 3138 Ocean View School District - Basic 600A School Modification Aid (Dept. of Ed.) 60111 School Institution Tuiton Tax (Dept. of Ed.) 707A Orange Cowity Transit District 710A Orange County Flood Control District 713R' Orange.County Harbors, Beaches 6 Parks District 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 020P ix1D-MMOC - Remainder Area 863E MWDOC - Original Area 918A Orange County Sanitation District N3 960A Orange Cowity Water District 961A Orange County dater District - Hater Reserve t t • i� i• 1 TABLE III - HEALTH 6 SAFETY CODE 33328 (C) fJ} i ! CITY OF MMITINGTON BEACH - OAKVIEW PROJECT ICI P.EPORr OF 1902-83 BASE YEAR REEVEME EACH DISTRICT CAN EXPECT FROM WITIiIN THE PROJECT ' I Bonded Basic Levy Indebtedness Total Fund Dist. Agency Name-+ Revenue Revenue* 82-83 Revenue 0049-01 054A Huntington Beach City $ 50,469.91 $15,124.94 $ 65,594.85 0072-16 820P ,1WD-,'-TWDOr - Re..*inder Area - 4,402.70 4,402.70 0075-01 S63B "MOC - Original Area - - - 0100-03 001E Orange County 39,716.58 113.97 39,930.55 2291-01 60CA Department of Education 3,243.73 - 3,243-73 4001-01 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 6,763.08 627.77 7,305.85 4051-01 7131 Crange County Harbors, Beaches & Parks Dist. 4,417.52 - 4,:17.52 5331-01 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 1,134.67 - 1,134.G7 5881-01 960A Orange County water Dist. 1,957.81 - 1,957.81 5901-01 96L1 Orange County Eater Dist. - ;dater Reserve 29.36 s - 29.3G 7141-01 310A Huntington Beach Union H. S. Dist. 55,357.31 2,097.73 57,155.04 7311-31 300B Coast Co".-untiy College Dist. 23,385.93 - 23,385.93 8431-01 313B Ocean. View School Dist. - Basic 67,429.05 28,747.44 96,176.49 9041-01 918A Orange County Sanitation Dist. 43 9,599.19 14.41 9,613.60 5321-01 7;4A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 492.84 - 492.84 TRA TOTAL $264,OO1.98 $51,128.96 $315,130.94 3 i t t 1 l I TABLE IV - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (D) 1 CITY OF 11UNTINGTO:i BEACH - OAYVIE 1 PROJECT REPORT OF TOTAL AD VALOM11 REVENVE EACH DISTRICT HAS AVAILABLE FROM WITHIN AND OUTSIDE. T11E PROJECT fll 'I The revsnue data necessary to complete this section of the Fiscal Review Report does not currently exist because of the impact- of Assembly Dill S. An imordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Auditor-Controller's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Report does not contain the total Ad Valorem Revenue :.reformation for the project area. There has been included, however, a supplemental table of comparative assessed values for each taxing diutrict to give a relative indication of Ease Year Revenue percentage given up to the CRA. {{ See Table IV(D) , Supplemant. r� i • w TABLE IV - HEAL`rd AND SAFE CODE 33328 (D) SUPPLH2MNT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - OAKVIEW PROJECT REPORT OF BASE YEAR 1982-83 CPA A.V. PERCEIMAGE RELATIONSHIP TO TOTAL TAXING DISTRICT'S A.V. Taxing District's Percent of A.V. Within the Taxing District's Project AV Dist. Agency Name Project A.V. - County-wide to District 001E County Inside Excluding CSFF (County General) $26,400,198 t49:?36,868,136 .0531 054A Huntington Beach City 26,400,198 5,883,904,006 .4487 300E Coast Community College Dist. - Basic Area 26,400,198 16,7G2,650,086 .1575 1 310A Huntington Beach Union High School Dist. 26,400,198 9,172,131,892 .2878 313B Ocean View School Dist. - Basic 26,400,198 2,627,919,928 1.004G 600A School Modification Aid (Dept. of Education) 2G,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 601A School Institution Tuition Tax (Dept. of Education) 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 ! 713A Orange Count. Harbors, Beaches & Parks Dist. 26,400,198 70,394,280,403 .0375 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 26,400,198 70,377,080,051 .0375 820P ZvM-tr-MOC - Remainder Area (Metropolitan Water) 26,400,198 � 48,708,913,761 .0542 863B Municioal Water Dist. Orange County - Original Area 20,400,198 48,666,757,603 .0542 916A Orange County Sanitation Dist. #3 29,144,296 15,408,800,441 .1891 9G0.1 Orange Cour ty Water Dist. 26,400,198 47,3G5,335,538 .0557 9617% Orange County Water Dist. - Water Reserve 26,400,198 46,989,210,975 .0562 one percent = 1.0000 f' i TABLE VI - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 333213 (E) q CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - OAKViEW PROJECT REPORT OF AGENCY'S RF-VE14UE IN FIRST YEAR The Auditor-Controller has been advised by the Huntington Beach Corununi ty Redevelopment Agency that no major structures , and improvements will be made within the Project boundaries during the first year, so therefore we anticipate a conser- vative growth in value of the area within the Project boun- daries to increase by only 5.7 percent. i Total 1982-83 Base Year Revenue $315,130.9.3 Total Expected Percentage Increase In Value 5,71 1913-84 Increc,unt Tax Revenue Estimate S 17,962.46 { I TABLE IV - IIF-ALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (F) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - OANWIE19 PROJECT REPORT OF ASSESSED VALUATION BY BLOCK WITHIN THE PROJECT f i i Health and Safety Code, Section 33328 (f) requires: "afie assessed valuation of the project• area, by block for the preceding five years, except for state assessed property on the board roll." The assessed valuation data necessary to complete this •'', section of the Fiscal Review Report does not exist because the valuation files maintained by the County do not contain historical assessed values 15y block. An inordinate manual effort and expense would he required of. the County Assessor's and County Auditor's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, :he Fiscal Review Report does not contain the preceding five•-year assessed valuation information for ; �..� the project area. r, 1I Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90057. Objections to HUD on the release of funds on basis other than those stated in the previous ;paragraph will not be considered by IIUU. No objection received after November 29, 1982, will be considered by HUD. Robert P. Mandic 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 ft f f i i, i Page 3 of 3 The reasons for such decision not to prepare such Statement are as follows: Due to each site : location, it has been determined that significant natural resources would not be impacted by those projects. The projects are not located in an area of historical ! significance, or where historical resources would be found. The subject sites are not in the Cbastal Zone, wetland, flood plain, � or near a scenic river. There will be no impact or. endangered species or sole source aquifers. The projects fall within the f 65 CNEL and is not within 2,000 feet of any oil storage facility. I An Environmental Review Record respecting the subject projects has been made which documents the environmental review of the projerts and more fully sets forth the reasons why such statement is not required. This Environmental Review Record is on rile at the above address and is available for public examination and copying upon request at the third floor between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. No further environmental review of the projects is proposed to be conducted prior to the request for release of federal funds. All interested agencies, groups or individuals disagreeing with either of the two proposed actions are invited to submit written comments for consideration. Such comments will be received at 2000 Main Street on or before November 29, 1982. All written com- ments received will be considered and the City of Huntington Beach will not request the release of Federal funds or take any action on the described projects prior. to HUD's written authorization to use those ftinds. It is requested that those forwarding comments specify ' which of the proposed actions is being addressed. . OBJECTIONS TO HUD ! The City of Huntington Beach will undertake the projects described above with Block Grant funds from HUD under Title I of the HCDR-1974 . The City of Huntington Beach .is certifying to IIUD that the City of Huntington Beach and Robert P. Mandic, in his official capacity as Mayor consent to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities .in relation to en- vironmental review, decision making and action; and that these re- sponsibilities have been satisfied. The legal effect of the certi- fication is that upon its approval Block Grant funds may be used and IIUD will have satisfied its responsibilities; under the National En- vironmental Policy Act of 1969. HUD will accept all objection to its approval of the release of funds and acceptance of the certification only if it is on one of the following basis: (a) That the certifi- cation was not in fact executed by the Certifying Officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD; or (b) that applicant's envi- ronmental review record for the projects indicates ominsi.on of a re- quired decision finding or step applicable to the projects in the environmental review process. OY.1ections must be prepared and sub- mitted .in accordance with the required procedures under 24CFR hart 58.75 of the Interim Regulations found in the Federal Register dated April 12, 1982. These Regulations are available in the office of the (Grants Recipient) . They may be addressed to, Environmental I i Page 2 of 3 J r s 7 , NOTICE TO PUBLIC OF REQUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF FUNDS AND NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE EN- VIRONMENT HAS BEEN POSTED WITH THE CITY CLERK AND AT Tilt HUNTINGTON BEACII LIBRARY Date: November 11, 1982 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5542 TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS AND PERSONS: i The purpose of this notice is to identify two separate but re- lated actions to be taken by the City of Huntington Beach. I. On or about November 290 1982, the City of Huntington Beach will request the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to release Federal funds under Title I of the housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-383) for the following t projects: Project 1. South Oakview Area Improvement Project 2. Washington Neighborhood Public Improvement Project 1. Provide street improvements, parking days, laiidscaping, widen Oak Lane alley to facility emergency vehicle access. Project 2. Street Improvements: curbs, gutters, lights, sidewalk; along with a domestic water distribution system. Huntington Beach, Orange County, California Project 1. An area south of Warner Avenue, west of Beach Boulevard, east of Nichols Street (noledo Drive, Oak Lane) . Project 2. North of Warner Avenue, west of Beach Boulevard, cast of the railroad right-of-way) . II. It has been determined that such request for release of funds will not constitute an action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and accordingly the above- . named (Grant Recipient) has decided not to prepare an Envi- ronmental Imapct Statement under the National Environmental t Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190) . - 3D t t fA i bli(1htinq conditions within the Project Area. Should the Agency acquire any real property for ntlier than streets or other public purposes, it will sut)srgtirntly dispose of such -property fnr uses corsistent with the adopted Gwicral Plan for the. City of Huntington Beach and be further consistent with the above-quoted section of the Government Code. 10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Environmental impact Report (EIR) on the Oakview Redevelopment Plan has been completed as required by the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. During the meeting of September 8, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission reviewed and approved the draft EIR and forwarded it to the City Council for Its approval and certification. The final EIR will be reviewed and certified by the City Council prior to consideration of the adoption of the Oakview Redevelopment Plan and then incorporated herein as part of the Report to the City Council. 11.0 COUNTY FISCAL OFFICCR REPORT Pursuant to Section 3332E of the California Health and Safety Code, the State Board of Equalization and the Bounty officials charged with allocating taxes are required to prepare and deliver, within 90 days of receipt of the Statement of Preparation, Project legal description and maps, to the Redevelopment Agency and each of the affected taxing i agencies, a report containing tine following: A. The total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the Project Area as shown on the base year assessment roll. B. The identification of each taxing agency levying taxes In the Project Area. C. The amount of tax revenue to be derived by cacti taxing agency from the base year assessment roll from the Project Areal including state subventions for homeowners, business inventory and similar such-subventions. D. For each taxing agency, Its total ad valorem tax revenues from all property within its boundaries, whether inside or outside the Project Area. E. The estimated first year taxes available to the Redevelopment Agency, if any, based upon information submitted by the Redevelopment Agency, broken down by taxing agencies. 1 F. The assessed valuation of the Project Area, by block, for the preceding five years, cxcr.pt for state assessed property on the board roll. G. The total assessed valuation of all taxable property outside of the Project Area which is withi 300 feet from the boundaries of the Project Area as shown or, the base year assessment roll. f 8 1'o'hilr thn ninnty clays have axt)lrCd at the draftinq of this Report to the City rouncii, the firral Infnrinntion, Minn recolved, will be attached herPte as Aonendix n and made a tart of this Report to the City Council on the Rr±di-volopment Man. rnrrespondenco reflecting AgP.ncy contact with the County Fiscal Officer and State Board of 1=qualization � concerning this is attached in Appeodix B. I� 12.0 FISCAL_ REViF-W REPORT Nano- of the taxing entities called for formation of ,a Fiscal Review Committee prior to the required deadline to analyze the fiscal impact of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. 13.0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT The City's objective in pursuing the Redevelopment Project is to mitigate the existing substandard conditions and to mitigate the severe development limitations that are now, and will continue to be in the future. Without public and orivate sector c-►operative action, constraints to prover utilization of the Project Area will not be overcom.:. - The Redevelopment Plan, as presently envisioned, while providing far the assemblage and sale of selected nropertles and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency, anticipates- few, if any, acquisitions. However, if owners of these parcels are desirous of participating in the uraject, such ►participation will be encouraged in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistace and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for Pucahse of property to be negotitated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of rolocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and Its activities. Although the 'impact of relocation could be negative, its long-term Impact is expected to be positive in that relocation will afford residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to be positive over the log term. Development of modern, well-planned commercial and i residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the 1 surrounding arras. Furthermore, in achieving such development, existing blighting Influences will be Irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods su:raunding the Project Area could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, naise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modern and well-dasigned facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington ©each. 9 As presently envisioned, it is the desire of the Agency Lo consLruct, or cause the eon:truction ar rehabilitation of, approximately 100 residential units and to assist in thu creation of approximately 300,000 square feeL of new commercial/office development. The total value of improvements would be approximately 35,000,000. i Residential - 100 Units 1,000 vehicle ti ips per day increase .. 150 parking spaces increase 25,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase 30,000 gallons of water Per day increase 500 pounds of solid waste per day increase .. 110 potential maximum student increase 220 population Increase Commercial/Office - 300,000 Square Feet - pooh vehicle trips per day incr ease - 1,200 parking spaces increase 50#000 gallons of sewerage per day increase - 60,000 gallnns of water per day increase - 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day increase A Population increase of 220 will probably not require the addition of firemen and related equipment, policemen and related equipment, and will not require additional educational fat,ilities. it is anticipated that some changes will be required in the traffic and circulation system, the water and sower system and in the solid waste management system. rreation of the proposed Redevelopment Project will dffect the payment of property taxes on existing land holdings or structures both within and outside of the Project Area. Existing property tax will be paid in accordance with the provisions of Propositi n 13. However, as change of ownership occurs, and as new development Is constructed, the property will be reappraised by the County of Orange and; while the rate will rernaln the same, the taxes paid will Increase as a result of the County reappraisal. �i 14.0 ANALYSIS OF THE COIJ; rY FISCAL OFFICER REPORT AND CONSULTATIONS FCLL TAWITH EACH AFED AGENCY The analysis of the County Fiscal Of. "s Report will be provided upon receipt of the i report by the Agency (refer to Appendix . The staff of the Redevelopment Agency pru. d all taxing entities with copies of the ' various documents and called and/or met with tht. ,ff of each entity's board. Responses, requests and recommendatlons are included In Appcn,. g agency -iticed regarding the joint In addition each affectc:i toxin a enc has been pro;. wblle hearing for the Redevelopment flan. Should any tu. 'ity have further input, ! they should express their concertis at that time. i' 10 I ' APPENDIX A RESOLUTION NO. 1297 (ION, A RESOLUTIONt, OF THE.P01INNING C0111f1ISSION OF HUNTINGTdta BEACH RECV,'jMEt1DI11G ADOPTION OF THE OAYViE1W REDEVELOP- M,MT PLAN, CERTIFICATION OF THE VIVIRtZMMENTAL It.PACT REPORT AND REPOR*ri.".'G ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOP,MENT PLAN FOR SAID PROJECT ;MEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency submitted tha proposed Rede- velopment 91an for the Oakview Redevelopment Project to the Planning Commission for its report and recoh:mendation pursuant to the California Con7uunity Redevelopment Law; and WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency also submitted to the Planning Coinnission the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Oakview Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Piannigy Commission has reviewed and considered the proposed Recce- velopment Plan and the inforr,)atiun container in the Environmental Impact Report for said Redevelopment Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Planning Connission of the City of Hinting- ton Beach as follows: 1. The Planning Cormmission reconnends that the City Council certify the Environ- mental Impact Report for the proposed Oakv'ew Redevelopment Project as has been pre- I pared and completed in compliance with the-California Environmental Quality Act of , ,'970 (C.E.Q.A. ) and State and local regulations and guidelines adopted pursuant thereto., 2. The Planning Caumission's report and reconviondations concerning the proposed Redevelopment Plan are as follows: A. That the proposed Redevelopment Plan as submitted to the Planning Coarzris- Sion confoons to the General Plan of the City of h. '.ington 0eac.h. U. The Planning Co.,mai s s i on recom!;iends that the City Council adopt the proposed Redevelcprrent Plan. C. The Secretory of the Planning Co„a„fission is hereby au;:jiorized add directed to file this report and rerovvendation with the Huntington Death Redevelop- ment Agency. REGULARLY PASSED AND AWTED by the Planning Conmission.of the ;:ity of Hunting- ton Beach, California, on the L day of $�ntentbe; 3.992. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Paone, Winchell , Schumacher NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Porter, M rjahangir t ATTEST: ames M. Secretary mmPPaone,C Chairman w I 1 ,� �Nrtrrulx B ' 0-1 County Fiscal Officer Report (To be attached upon official receipt by the Agency) 8-2 Correspondence with Count Auditor- Controller and State Board of Equalization 1 I t i • I , r i' 1. , I i •u:,,-�r.�p•.:Fps L l'a 5�` C U N-rY c) r-- V Aq1 a t`hl. i. OFFICE OF AUDITOP-CONTROLLER May 27, 1982 Tom 9\inscher City of lluntington Beach Housing & Con=unity oovelopment P.O. BOX 190 2000 Main Strect iluatington peach, CA. 92648 Subject: 't'albcrt-noach Project Oakview Project Yorl;to;,rn - Lahe Project• Main - Pier Project {Ie have receivad your notice of your Klan to ned four l.•ruject ' areas to the Iluntirulz011 beach Redevolopment Agency. our orrice will be compiling i'iscal Retolo • lZoportts for o.icn pro- { jert pursuant to Lhe.. requivemcut of health "Ind Safo cad" 33320. Since your tier,ignated hasp year is 1902-03, ..c will be cn- able to ,tart preparing these reports until 8-20•-82 i:hen the new 1902-83 roll of values is available. , ?{ tic also, want to state our intentions to b;ll your agern:y for the cost of preparinU these reports as auLhorixed by ilealt1i and Safo- ty Code Section 33320.7. We hope this information will he of wsgistance to you. If you have any questions, call me or Judy Gale at 834-2455. meal G. Gruber . Senior Accountant Tax. Section NX.jy ' cc: Warren Hayward, Assessor George Rebelia, r'Ao Jim Mc:Conne;1, Audi tnr-Coul:roller t 1 VAU Of CAMOLNIA " STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION c[�:;.r = :;1►Ir 1020 N SIR[tt• SACCAau1110, CALUOP A (P.O, BOX IM1. SACRAMENTO. CAUFOP41A 9:•5CU) Ir•`i: I ��C•..t.St� , (91u)322-2323 Ray 26, 3.992 full- :.,. s[►,r+[rr 1w,rd O rrdri, Sa« 1aro•1 • trC114;D MVI11S I c.rd,,�,.r••;a 1,P..nl.n« �C•�1at D.F[It tir. Tom 'Pincher, Direct-orf.rrd,.. S•r•rarr Tun inoa:. : Indt:nt-rial "`:torprice City of liuntington Peach 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Reach, CA 92640 Dca.r 1Ir. 'Pincher; This in to ael:zo:,ledge rcreipt, on Mi.v 251 H82', of ;;Brie four prellmim-- .Chin,,^r:z for the proponeri Taihert-Pe._c;t, O:tivle, 'tor!;to.t3-L-s1;e :lrld the PLxin-Pier fled evelopment Projectc. ALro received uurre Lhe p:oca,,csr.0 f cc:. ' of f-350, Z510, 3350 and -;350, recpec tivoly. • Your fi l l ivp— are hcrcbJ accepted. i You .lnl:cd that ou',,• r*evort reach you prior to Auntct 25, is na: IWO% hnnniblo. 'YoLr ^.L:rrat,:t^_ntn of rrr�il.ir..tfon ltrnride that i:hw 1^Z:?-c! roli in to l,r, thf,, bane for Lfic fuLtirt, rii.v.i"Doll of tl:•:r.::, 'Ih-Crrll.i ::ill rot unLU. hiv.,m.t 20, 128 (:;cc. 2052, ilnv. h Tax Couc). 11. 1:m:: bocsi r+t;r e:1 c;•- -Icnco that mid:;C:pLf."rber i:. a'Lboitt ar, carly 1n %:c can prJdUGC data in sil:ua- i tion n rurh an thi.-n. '1 • ! Because of tho volume of projects, s:n have :.n stork on a flr:zt in fi:•:rt out j bani.n. There are only tiro protects for Ella 19,12-0'3 roll LW-tt bare, filed prior to youra, no sic --hould bo able to begin working on yoltr pro,jcct„ coon after the Board roll in adopted on Auru.t 20. There in nothinS we can do to :speed up the process. :sincerely, '�L t '• i i•1•artin C. Robrl.o Utility Roll Analy. t VALUXV10H 0XV101011 NVI(mb cc: Ormi,-.0 County A--.-c;sor i Oranga County Auditor ' I ' 1 ijv" COUNTY SANI T'ATION DISTRICTS ;';. T:CA r. •n►I 14 •� .�.�.. ' „�c• renc 7I• OFORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ..'`r`_'':• S;6'� •-•311 I P. A. BOX O1:7. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIF13RNIA 77.70B IOU44 CLL15 AVENUE (EUCLID UFF-RAMP SAN 01rC;U FREEWAY) July 29, 1982 City of Huntington Beach PoEt Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, Cn 92648 Attention: Mr. Tom Tincher, Director Business and Industrial Enterprise subject: Talbert-Beach, Oakview, Yorktown-Lake and Main Pier Redevelopment Plans i in accordance with my discussion with Mr. J•like the City' s r' consultant, enclosed i:; a copy of a sample agreement developed between the Districts and other redevelopir,;:nt• agencies a•izich provides for Payment to the Dis-trI.CL of a proportionate share of- the annual tax Increment within the redevelopment I agency boun- dariea to pay for the costs of providing sewerage service. . Ile look forward to the opportunity to discuss this matter further at our meeting schedules] for 2 p.m. , August 5th at the Districts' offices. If• you have any questions or require further information, please contact the undersigned. . \•• t ��y/ tip ! ;: , r. J . 'Wayne Sylvester Assistan,e General Manager i JWS:113B:hc Enclosure • APr,vx C TAXING EUTITIES RESPOt;SES C-1 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California July 29, 1982 August 28, 1982 C-2 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California f I t r AGREr :.VT THIS AGREEMENT is mode and entered into, to be effective t this day of , 1982, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. — OF ORMOGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "District" ) ; and j (hereinafter referred to as "Agency" ) . RECTTWLS t i. WHEREAS, District is a Countv Sanitation district � organized and existing pursuant to the .County Sanitation District Act (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et sea. ) and constitutes an independent special district providing wastewater I collection and treatment throughout most of the CounCy of OrGnan, and specifically within the 'area of the a and IIEREAS, Agency is a redevelopment agency existing pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law, (California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000 et spec . ) and which has been authorized to transact business and exercise the : i powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the legislative body of the community; and WHEREAS, Agency is proposing to carry out a project ' pursuant to a specific Redevelopment plan adopted by the legislative body, which. Plan 'includes properties located w;•ithin the jurisdictional boundaries of District; and I 1 I.11ILREAS, the adopted F;edevclopment Plan contains provisions for the allocation of tax revenue increment; and WHEREAS, the Agency project, by reason of the tax increment provisions in the approved Redevelopment Plan, togc:he: with informational data provided by District, will have certain adverse impacts on the financial planning and administration of District; and WIIEREAS., Agency, pursuant to Stealth arsd Safety Code Section 33401 may, in any year during which it owns property in a redevelopment project, pay directly to' District an amount of money in lieu of taxes if District would have received the benefit of a ta): which would have otherwise been levied upon such (OWN property had it not been exempt under the Redevelopment Plan; and ti WHEREAS, pursuant to health ana Safety Code Section 33�011 Agency may also pay to District as a taxing agency with territory located in the project area, an amount of money which, in 'the Agency' s determination, is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to the District by the redevelopment project; and WHEREAS, in recognition of the authority provided by law, 1 the parties wish to provide for the alleviation of financial burdens or detriments. to District in accordance with the specific terms hereof. I � ' NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and prornises .contained herein, the parties hereto agree: �.. -?.- I Section 1: Agency agrees to pay to District, and nistricL agrees to accept from Agency, specific financial payments as provided in this agreement, as full alleviation Of any financial burden or detriment caused by Ag�.ncy' s Redevelopment Plan to District. . Section 2: For each year in which Agency receives :evenue fror. properties within that portion of the project area located within the jurisdictional boundaries of District pursuant to Health and Safety Code .Section 33670 (b) , Agency will pay to District percent of the amount of such revenue attributable to the levy of the one percent basic tax rate. co: Section 3: Agency and- District agree that the percentage used in Section M above, represents District' s snare of tax .? generated in the Base Year of the redevelopment project of Agency r (1981-82) , from the levy of the general one percent basic tax rate. Section 4: The agreed upon payments to District as set forth above, are subject to the following conditions and limitations: S�J. A. Agency' s obligation under this agreement is deemed s:. to constitute an indebtedness of the redevelopment prof ect.. .,. B. Payments to District are to be made solely from that revenue received by Agency pursuant to the provisions of Health & Safety Code Section 33670 (b) . i -3- ..._+r....rM•wr.r.Mn {:..M�.i•1 Y+a....n, .... .. ., � w..w.. ...... . i. .. , C. Agency' s obligation to make the above-refe crnced payments to District is expressly subordinate 'Co the pledge of tax revenue by Agency to repayment of Agency indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, issued for purposes of carrying out the redevelopment project. 10 D. Agency, ,in determining the annual amount of Agency indebtedness and debt service on any said indebtedness (other 'than indebtedness to District as a result of this agreement) , shall not include in the estimated tax revenue of Agency, the amounts estimated as payable to District under this agreement. E. If, during any year while this agreement remai:is effect, District is not one of the public entities i sharing in the tax revenue generated ,by application of the general one percent basic tax levy against Ehe Base Year assessed 'value of the properties located within the project, then Agency's obligation to make payments provided For herein shall. cease. Section 5: This agreement shall remain in force and effect For so long as. Agency continues to exist or until such time as District receives its share of the general one percent tax levy on the full assessed value as provided by Health and Safety Code Section 33670 (b) . Section 6: This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Agency and District, and any changes, -4- , �ql Yy.•J Yf M•TwP .j`..�aw:..r wr r.... .r.. ....�.--. ...�..w. ... .. ..,.. .....M i nmutlifications, or amendments thereto shall be legally binding and effective only upon the duly executed written amendment hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. c _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. ' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By . Chairman, Board of Directors By Secretary, Board o . Directors REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVED AS TO FORM; By . Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff i General Counsel ATTEST: Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: General Counsel " •�� �.� YCI CPHONCS: COUNTY SAN i rATION DISTRICTS .,: AgCA CODC '714 �,.� 5au••d910 OF GRAN -E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '�`' 962-2411 ~ � 1 P. C. DOx 0127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIr ORNIA 92700 ' 1CIB44 ELUS AVENUE (CUCLID OFF-RAMP. SAN DjEsD FRCCWAY) August- 18, 1982 Huntington peach Redevelopment Agency 11��14tip'VCI�tif�,Dts Post Jffice Box 190 I,'%q Huntington Beach, CA 92648 cc, ' Attentions Mr. Tom Tincher, Director Business and Industrial Enterprise Subitots Oakview and Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Projects E� F On August 5, our staff met with your consultant, Mr. Mike Wagner, and staff , member, Mr. Stephen Kohler, to discuss the District's concerns regarding the City's proposed redevelopment plans. Mr. Wagner requested we correspond with . the Agency Board directly regarding this matter. County Sanitation Gf41,rict No. 3 is'a taxing agency affected by subject proposed 1 redevelopment projects. The District is responsible for sewerage service for II development within the area. Our costs are escalating rallidly because of federally mandated requirements, energy impacts and inflation. Presently the `. only source of operations and maintenance revenue is ad valorem taxes. Because 'I t of the demands placed on the District's system by the redevelopment projects and the fact that the taxes will be frozen at the base year, the cost of service will not be adequately covered. Therefore, the District would like to- respectfully propose an agreement wherein the Redevelopment Agency would pay to � the District the proportionate share of the annual tax increment within the project boundaries. The proportionate share that the District presently receives from the basic ad valorem tax revenue for all properties within District No. 3 is 3.5661. Enclosed is a copy of a standard agreement that the District has used with other redevelopment agencies. If He may provide any further inrormation or assistance .with respect to this agreement, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. "J. Wayne Sylvester'-/ JWS:hc Assistant General Manager Enclosure cc: Brace Pinlayson, Chairman, Dist. 3 Robert P. Mandic, Mayor/Director Ron Pattinson, Councilman/vice Joint Chairman Ruth Bailey, Councilwoman/Director Engineering Department J i i AGREE,%JENT t THIS .4rREV-1ENT is made and entered into, to be effective this day of _ , *1982, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. �. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "District" ) ; and (hereinafter referred to as "Agency" ) . P.EC-----.z T.S 1 WHEREAS, District is a County Sanitation District organized and existing ` pursuant to the County Sanitation District l Act (California Health and Safety Code Sections 4700 et sea. ) and constitutes an independent special district providing wastewater collection and treatment throughout most of the Count} of Orange, ► and specifically within- the area of the and i 14HEREAS, Agency is a redevelopment P it agency existing pursuant to the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law, (California Health -and Safety Code Sections 33000 et ' sea. ) and which has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the legislative body of the community; and MlER,DAS, Agency is proposing to carry out a project pursuant to a specific Redevelopment Plan - adopted by the legislative body, which Plan includes properties located within cho jurisdictional boundaries of District; and .. .. ..- . ..............«...� +..... ....-.,.�� .--.... ....�.r..>'+Yi..-. ,Tfb✓ 1.�.+.1•y..C'.�r1li►r. WHEREAS, the adopted Redevelopment Plan contains provisions for the allocation of tax revenue increment; and WHEREAS, the Agency pr,oject�; by reason of t:Ie tax i increment provisions in the approved Redevelopment Plan, together with informational data provided by District, will have certain adverse impacts on the Financial planning and administration of i District; and WHEREAS, Agency, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33401 may, in any year during which it owns proocrty in a redevelopment project, pay directly to District an amount of }}� money in lieu of taxes if District would have received the. t betsefit of a tax' which would have otherwise been levied upon such i 10'"N property had it not been exempt under the Redevelopment plan• and WHEREAS pursuant - to Health and Safety Code section 33o01, Agency may also pay to District as a taxing agency with territory located in the project area, an amount of money which, in ' the Agency' s -determination, ' is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to the District by the redevelopment project; and ; WHEREAS, in recognition of the authority Provided by law, Y the parties wish to provide for the alleviation of financial burdens or detriruents. to District in accordance with the specific terms hereof.. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the nutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree; J +7« i Section 1: Agency agrees to pay to District � and District agrees to .accept From Agency, spe.citic financial payment, a s provided in this agreement, as fu1�1 alleviation of any f burden or detriment inr.nci 1 caused bAgency' s a_ Y Redevelopment plan to District. Se�tiol 2; For each year -ill which Agency receives revenu -from properties within that ,, e Portion of she project area located within the jurisdictional boundaries Of District Pursuant Health and Safety Code Section P ant to 33670 (b) , Agency will pay to District ..... percent of the amount of suco revenue attributable to the levy of the one percent basic tax rat e. Section 3: Agency and District agree that the percentag►;,, used in Section 2 abov e, represents Districtis share of generated in the F3as • ,.� e Year of the redevelopment's ro • f �. S P ect o Agency� (14n1-82} , from the f levy of the e ,gneral one percent basic tax rate. Section f,... The agreed upon payments to District as Set , . ..ti.. forth above, are subject to the followina conditions I limitations: and A. Age ncY' s obligation under this agreement is deemed to constitute `:;•�� an indebtedness of the redevelopment -. Project. S• Payments to District a,re to be made solely from, that revenue received by Agency Pursuant t g y so the 1 Provisions of health & Safety Code Section 33 b70 (b) . -3- 1 C. Agency' s obligation to make the above-:e=erence:d payments to District is expressly subordinate to the pledge of tax revenue by Agency to repayment of Agency indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, issued for purposes of carrying out the redevelopment project. D. Agency, in determining the annual amount of Agency ird^btedness and- debt service on any said indebtedness (other - than ;.ndebtedness to District as a result of this agreement) , shall not include in the estimated tax revenue of Agency, the amounts estimated as payable Lo District undo: this agreement. E. If, during any year while this agreement remains in, effect, District is not one of the public entities sharing in the tax revenue generated by application of the general one percent basic tax levy against the Base Year assessed value of the properties located within the project, then Agency' s obligation to make payments provided for herein shall cease. Section 5: This agreement shall remain in force and f effect for so long as Agency continues to exist or until such time as District. receives its share cf the general one percent tax levy on the full assessed va'. ..e as provided by health and Safety Code Section 336.70 tb) . section 6: This agr constitutes the entire ( ' agreement between the Agency and District, and any changes, `. _q_ �I I i 1 1 modifications, or amendments thereto shall be � 1 � hinai leya � - _ ng and i effective only upon the duly executed Written a:nendnent hereto. IN WITNESS MIEREOF � the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. COUNTY SANITATION' DISTRICT N0. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Chairman, Board of Dir actors By 1 Secretary► Board Of Directors . i REDEVELOPILENT AGENCY APPROVED AS TO FORM: I By Thomas L. Woodruf Chairman Genera, Counsel, ATTEST: Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORA: General Counsel i . -5- he A1et1*vh01i1an Water District � . Of .So�utl�clrr� C�1lit�ornra fla�rr n1 lin,,r,l nl 1)1111 Inn July 13, 1982 '1'Ilc Governing Body Housing alid Conununi-Ly Development City of Iluntington Beach P•0o Box 190 Huntington Beach, California t 92Gy8 Gentlemen: Tcllbert-Deacli Redevelopnlc3nt Project oak;viety Redevelopn1enL Project • Yorktown.-sake Redevelopment Project � E1ait1-Pier Reap )rtr+ ``► nl.• I t.o 'ect t L•'nclo5ed are certified copies of Resolutions . 7914 , 7915, and 791E cic: 7913, cting 'to receive aJ i. locatxon of taxes Pursuant to Provisions of the Conlnlu These resolutio nit � ns here aclopt`d b y Redevelo!);;i�,nt Law. i Y the Board of �. Tile Metropolitan Water district meeting of July of southorn C Directors of ts � California at i 13, 1982. r Very truly Yours, Karenj�" I:. Dortf f . • pb Executive Secretary i i E"cl. (4) T � • I I11 Some)11uul,�y,11,l�.► „ � µ Ic..('.rhi.i ALulin�.ltldh•tt:Ilo�51151,lut,ln•. 1�--•'' .. irlol+Ar",C;1� .- i 1.17.,Il•f010 II 1 RESOLUTION 7913 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ELECTING TO RECEIVE ALLOCATION OF TAXES PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE gOMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW WHEREAS, Section 33676 0` the Community Redevelopment Law (Sections 33, 000 et seg, , of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California) provides that ► any affected taxing agency, such as the Distr;ct, may elect to be allocated, in addition to that portion of taxes- allocated to the District pursuant to subdivision ( a) of Section 33670 of said Law, all or any portion of the tax revenues allocated to a redevelopment agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of said Section 33670 attributable to increases in the 'District's tax rate which occur after a redevelopment plan becomes effective. i NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of 71he Metropolitan Water District of Southern California that this District hereby elects tc be allocated, in addition to the portion of taxes allocated to this . i District pursuant to subdivision (a) of- Section 33670 of the COnunuriity Redevelopment Law (Sections 33, 000 et seg. , of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Calife�rnia ) , all of the tax revenues allocated to the Talbert-Beach R^development 1 •. Project of the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to subdivision (b) of said Section 33670 attributable to any increases in this District's tax rates which occur after the tax year in which the ordinance adopting the redevelopment plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project of the ' City of Huntington beach becomes effective. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Secretary is hereby directed to file forthwith certified copies of this resolution with the governing body of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the Auditor- Controller, and the TaK Collector for the County of Orange. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing is a full , true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, at its meeting held July 13, 1902 . r--1 Ae ew ' Executive 'Secre:-- The Metropolitan Water District o Southern California A"TENOIX 0 LEGAL NOTICE ANO BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS r LEGAL NOTICE f/O NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE //'•� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY ON THE PROPOSED OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City California and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency haveosetuOctobern4, 198 Beach, at 7:30 p.m, as the time, and the. Council Chambers of the City Hall , 2000 Main 982 Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 as the place for a joint Public hear- ing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to consid • dPProval and adoption of the proposed Oakview Redevelopment plan, a �c hear ir►rplement the adopted Plan if, after the joint public hearing, the consider the approves and adopts the proposed Redevelopment Plan, The Agency will 9 City Council 1 The purpose of the joint public hearing is to consider: I. The Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Agency which proposes as its scope and objective to eliminate unsafe conditions, improve overall appearance, encourage participation, encourage new development, provide needed public improvements and facilities. 2. The report of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelop- ment Plan includes, but is not limited to, the report and recoirmenda- tion of the Planning Co;nnission on the `plan and the report elop� Fiscal Review Committee (if any), P of the .Coun;y f 3. The Environmental Impdct Report on the proposed Plan a. All evidence and testimony for add a ' ment�Plan. against the adoption of the Redeveiop- At the above stated day, hour and place, any and all persons having tions to the proposed Redevelopment Plan or to the regularity of an any riorC" Proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause wh prior proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. why the At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, an objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan may file in writingwith Clerk a statement of his objections to the proposed Redevelopment p y person or organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an o the City P Plan Any person � At the aforesaid hour the Council shall opportunity to be heard, ' and oral objections to the proposed RedeveloPmentoPlanr and Pass upon all written The proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report file and open for put!-.'. inspection in the Office of the Direct Industrial Enterprise, 20OJ Main Street P t are now on P , Huntington Beach, Californiar Of 892648. and Every property owner, business or 48• `Pursuant to the Participation Rules adopted by Agency,nsuldsubmit Agency a completed "Statement of Interest to Participate" wit becoming participant, frdrn the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Agency. t) the i hinysixty'(60) day, ��. The boundaries of the proposed Redevelo "A", as follows: Pment 'Plan are as defined in Exhibit LEGAL nIsSCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT That portion Of Section 26, Towns Rancho La Bolsa Chica and hip 5 South, Range 11. tti'est i the �\ the Raneho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, ,State of 'California, as shown on a ma recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office o the County Recorder described as .follows, f Beginning at the east one--quarter corner of said Sectio South 890 24 ' 16" West 463. 11 feet to a n 26, thence longatioh of the east line of Keelson Lane, at ' sout a herly gro- ret60 in width, 30 feet either side oP centerline, a saidepoint� Ong be ng feet True Point of Beginning; thence along said southerl the South Oa 45' 06" East AO feet t y prolongation o the south line of Slater Avenue, a street 60 feet in width, 40 feet e r ither side of cente . South 89° 24 ' 1G" West 1187 feet along said south line..to the west one; thence line of Tract No. 4091; thence along said west line Nor. West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 409 ' th 00 44 ' a north line North 890 24 ' 39" East 300 feet to 1` thence along siu of the west line of Oak Lane, a s the southerly exte;�siur� .- - street being GO `feet in width, feet either side of centerline; thence North 0" 441 West 1 feet along said southerly extension 46" t�►est 2041 � , the west line of Oak Lane and its northerly extension to a line parallel with and 60 fee.t north measured at right angles from the centerline of Warner Ave along said parallel line North 890 25' hue; thencs� centerline of Beach Blvd. , said street beinga132st 138o feet to the feet either side Of centerline; thence feet in width, GG Oa 45' along said centerline South 14" East 996 feet; thence South 890 25' 00" West 263 f thence South 00 45' .14" East 288 feet; eGt; . 20 feet; thence South 0° 45, 14„ thence 89° 25 ' 00" West Saath East 96 feet to the easterly lion then Of the north line of Tract No. 8916 • .� exten- line South 890 25' qp" 19est 576 feet to t thence along said north a street bale he east line of Ash Street, g 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline• thence along said east line .South 00 44 ' . 46" East 100.. feet to a curve concave nartheasterly •haviny a radius bf SO feet; , curve southerly ; thence along said and southeasterly thru a central angle of 36° an arc distance of 32. 26 feet to a 52' 12" westerlypoint on a reverse curve concave r having ��- . a radius of 50 feet, a radial frcm said point bears North 520- 23 ' 02" east; thence alonci said revere curve• southeasterly, r r- souther].}', and southwesterly thru a central 'angle of 78° 54 ' 35" an arc distance of 60. 06 feet to a compound curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 35 feet, a radial to said Point hears South 480 420 23's east; thence along said compound curve southwesterly and westerly thru a central angle of 480 11 ' 23011 an arc distance of 29. 44 feet to a point on the south line of Mandrell Drive being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of c.ent.erline; thence along said south line south 890 29 ' 00" west 11, 8 feet to the east line of tract No. 4301; thence aloe said mentioned east line South 0°, 44 ' 46" east 270 feet to a point 0 on a non--tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radiur of 70 feet, said Point being on the north line of DarLon Drive and the east line of Queens Lane; thence alone said curve and east line southeastrrl•. and southerly thru a central angle of 770 44 ' 59" 95 rCet; thence .south U° 44 + S2" an arc distance of easterly having a radius of 70 feetstthence ecoto a curve concave north- easterly along line of Queens vane and the east said mentioned curve southerly and southeaster!-- thru a' central 27 angle of 30 + AOt1 an .1rc dist.ti lce of 34 feet to a _.. reverse curve cancavr. southeasterly having a radius of 130 f . radial to said point hears North GL" 37 + eeL, �� reverse curve southeasterly and ,outherL 00" Cast; thence along gajd j 38 ' 00" all arc distance of 6j fact to nor u a central angle of ?.;� t1. •.line of Tract 4153; thence along said north line North 89° . 24 + 35" East 125 feet to the east line of Tract 4153- thence .•Tong said east line South 0 44 58 s +' 500 feet; thence North 89° 24 ' 16" East o ' East I97 feet to the east line Of Keelson Lane; thence along said east line And its sou Ion7atian 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Southerly Pro- Alicia M, Wentworth sty er , unt ngton eici Mty ounc ' Secretary, Huntington Beach Redevelopment Aac• /S/ Charles W, Thom son �tY m n stratar, sty o untington each Executive Officer, Huntington Beach Redevelot- 1 DATED: 8117182 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Agent CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (714) 536-5227 ....wvr..,a.:^w... .�. _.._..._......_, .. s.. --- •` - ,.._. .. ..�...,......_.. _..._....+----.-....,..._.».-.: =wtrc...o.a:r{,rtw•nr.aw uat;�;T�,i2':ir1 nAPPENDIX E FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT I. PROJECTED REVENUES A. Residenl-ial - 100 units @ $50,000/unit $ 5,000,000 S. Office - 270,000 square feet @ $100/sq. ft. 27,000,000 C. Commercial - 30,000 square feet 0 $100/sq. ft. 3,000,000 D. Total market value 35,000,000 C. Estimated increment 350,000 F. Less 40% foi• Housing and Coverage .210,000 G. Bond or Note Issue (12% - 25 years - 7.1 X) 1,491,000 H. Net Bond Proceeds (less 30% - Reserve, Issuance, etc. ) 1,043,700 II. PROJECT COSTS '. i A. Street Improvements (includes curbs, gutters, side- $ 943,700 walks paving, right-of-way acquisition and street lighting) B. Administration 100,000 C. Total $ 1,043,700 r'! APPENDIX F i . I ' I I � DOCUMENTATIU'N OF BLIGHT REPORT for the t OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT i I PREPARED BY MICHAEL J. WAGNER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. y 1 t• Huntington Beath Redevelopment Agency 2000 Main Street i Huntington Beach, California t ..wVM.t•.1•..�.•<M1:M+�.M.M..w+...•.• ..1.:t1'. .t.... •a ..•�....___ .........n .. �....... ....... .... .. ..r ... •.w... w.r.Nv-.1 ii! C91 ;.v+vsn►rx+ rtrui�s;;,•aS4'd1"i . . I 4 QUALIFICATIONS OF MICHAEL J. WAGIJCR In the last seven years, Mr. Wagner has been responsible for and has participated extensively in the preparation of the Huntington Park North Redevelopment Plan, the Downey Redevelopment Plan, the Downey-Plan Amendments Vos. 1, 2 and 3, the Huntington Park C.R.D. Plan Amendment, the 6lalnut Improvement Agency Redevelop- ment Plan, the Las Lomas Redevelopment Plan for the City of Duarte, the Fruit Church Specific Redevelopment Plan for the City of Fresno, and the City Indus- trial Redevelopment Plan for the City of Irwindale. He has also been responsible for redevelopment'reports and relocation cases in the cities of Lomita, Seal Beach, Redondo Beach and Gardena. Additionally, he has worki.d with financial consultants, underwriters and bond counsel in the pre- paration of bond issues and has been responsible for and has prepared the fiscal ► data and information for the $40,000,000 City of Invindale bond issue, the $2,500,000 and $7,900,000 City of Duarte bond issues, the $4,100,000 Huntington Park Tax Allocation Bond issue, and the $14,420,000 and $40,000,000 Huntington I park Revenue Mortgage Bond issue. I � f , ,T I f j TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 BLIGHTING CHARACTERISTICS 2 2.1 Condition of Buildings and Structures 2 2.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values 2 2.3 Lack of Pu6)ic Improvements 2 2.4 Flooding 2 3.0 OTHER INDICATORS OF BLIGHT 2 3.1. Increased Crima Rates 2 3.2 Increased Fire Rates 2 4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION�! U 3 f � I 4 I r i LIST OF EXHIBITS A. Photographs of the Project Area B. Land Use Element Amendment 80-2 C. Assessor's Parcel Maps for the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area 0. Memorandum from Police Chief E. Memorandum from Fire Chief The relevant portion of each exhibit is attached to this report. Complete copies of each exhibit are available for both City Council and public inspection in the City Clerk's office. I i j "r 14461 i r"'1 1.0 VITRODUCTION The ordinance by the City Council adopting a redevelopment Man, pursuant to Section 33367(d)(3 ) of the State Health and Safety Code, must contain the findiny that "the project area is a blighted area ." Section 33031 of the Code defines a blighted area as an area "characterized by the existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living, commercial , industrial or other purposes, or, any combination of ' such uses, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are con- ducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency and crime because of any one or a combination of the following factors: ti (a) Defective design and character of physical construction; (b) Faulty interior arrangement ane.. exterior spacing; c1 High density of population and overcrowding; dj Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces and recreation facilities; (e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character, or shifting of uses." Section 33031 of the Code goes on to say that .a "blighted area is characterized by properties which suffer from economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of one or more of the following factors. I (a) An economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse resulting from faulty planning; (b) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size for proper usefulness and development; (c) The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other topo- graphy or physical ch,.racteristics of the ground and surrounding con- ditions; .(d) The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities wM ch cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment; (e) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments and social and economic maladjustment; i (f) The existence of lots or other areas which are subject to being submerged by water; provided that any ecologically valuable exist- ing features in such areas shall , to the maximum extent feasible, be preserved." Indications of blight would include (1) areas that are stagnant or improperly -' utilized because of -defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout or lack of accessibility, and (2) areas that contribute substantially and in- ;. creasingly to the problem of, and necessitate excessive and disproportionate expenditures for, crime prevention, correction, prosecution and punishment, the treatment of juvenile delinquenev, the preservation of the public health and safety, and the maintaining of adequate police, ,fire and accident protec- tion and other public services and facilities. This report will document that the proposed redevelopment project area is a E blighted area. 1 j 2.0 BLIGHTING CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Condition of buildings and Structures The Oakview Neighborhood is one of transition and improvement. Numerous structures are in need of minor rehabilitation. Some of the buildings are in need of major rehabilitation and removal . The Ocean View Elemen- tary School has been sold as surplus, has been subjected to arson, is boarded and is presently having a substantial blighting influence on the adjacent cieighborhood. The condition of buildings and structures is illustrated in the photographs attached as Exhibit A. The unattractive appearance of many of the structures and the amount of debris indicate adverse living conditions within portions of the project area. 2.2 Economic Disuse and Depreciated Values The lack of capital improvements (discussed further below) is having an adverse effect on property values within the project area. The condition of the Ocean View Elementary School site is having an adverse effect on the property values in the adjacent neighborhood. 2.3 Lack of Public Improvements According to the Land Use Element Amendment 80-22 (page 40), a portion of the Oakview Area water improvementi is 5 nee of general upgrading and is now only adequate for domestic use (see Exhibit 8). As evidenced in the Assessor's Parcel Maps (Exhibit C) and the photographs (Exhibit A), this area is lacking adequate right-of-way and necessary. i curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lights. 2.4 Flooding Because of the lack of necessary streets, the area is bvbjected to inade- quate drainage. After rain storms it takes months for water to fully evaporate. With neighborhood watering some puddles become safety and health hazards. 3.0 OTHER INDICATORS OF BLIGHT 3.1 Increased Crimc Rates According to the attached memorandum from the Police Department (Exhibit D), the crime rates in the project area are substantially higher than the City-wide average, and are one of the highest rates within the City. 3.2 Increased Fire Rates According to the memorandum from the Fire Department (Exhibit E), there are numerous fires within the project area. There are also a very high number of medical aid incidents within the area. Fire and medical re- sponse rates are substantially higher than for other parts of the com- munity. 2 4.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS As demonstrated in this report, the project area is blighted in numerous re- spects, including both buildings and property. The City Council 'if the City of Huntington Beach can and should make the finding that the project area is blighted and in need of redevelopment. The blighting effects which are having a substantial negative and adverse impact on the Project Area can be summarized as follows: 1. Approximately one-fourth of the units In this area (particularly along Koledo Lane, Barton Drive and Mandrell Drive) do not meet the current provisions of the Building Security sections of the City's Municipal Code whicl, requires enclosed parking garages For multiple dwellings. Many of these same units do not meet current off-street parking requirements with respect to the number of spaces per dwelling unit. Many of the apartments also do not have. private open space for individual units as currently required in the City's zoning ordinance. Many of the structures in the area are delapidated with unkept yards, old curbs and sidewalks and broken windows. 2. The condition of structures, economic disuse and lake of capital improve- ments make the property unsuitable for development by priva`, enterprise acting alone. These negative conditions can only be dealt %,, th by the positive powers of a redevelopment agency. 1 .Y rA " f •4 I w i S` I 1 I LA'1\J' D USE ELEMENT . AMENDMENT T 80u2 i Adopted December y 1980 Environm ental Impact Report 80 �3 • ; ;-:..T. h b untin ton he c g a department of development services i I l 1 - t��Lr ;•} � Oita'~ +•., I The existing five multi-story nodes described in the study range in sizc8 1; from 80 to 400 acres, with 10 to 25 percent of the area anticipated for � actual multi-story development. The applicant's project would dominate the newly designated multi-story node and could potentially develop beyond the anticipated 10 percent of the node area, becoming the only high-rise project within the node. This may or may not be a problem, depending on the rate of development and the desires of surrounding property ownars. Presently, the applicant's site Is the only site within the node %/hich could accommodate a multi-story suffix. In addition, a major development on this site could greatly influence the community as a whole. A major development would definitely alter the visual image of the arbe and may encourage a new direction for community growth such as the creation of a new activity corridor west along Warner Avenue to Huntington Harbour. Finally, a development of this scale and type may prove to be In direct competition with the revitalization efforts for the Downtown Area. The Coastal Element presents three alternative land use proposals for the Downtown Area one of which may be precluded If major office developments are being provided elsewhere in the community. 2. Economic Considerations The Planning staff, in cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., conducted n flseal Impact analysis of this project and is detailed in Appendix A. 3. Public Services and Facilities a. Sewers The area of concern is serviced by an existing 59 Inch County main located a!ong Warner Avenue. The Orange County Sanitation District has indicated that this system will accommodate the applicant's ultimate development proposal. b. Water There is an existing 21 inch County feeder main along Warner Avenue. How,rver, there is presently only one eight Inch main'off the feeder to service the area of concern and a portion of Beach I Boulevard. The whole area Is in need of a general upgrading and is presently only adequate for domestic use. The project would require a loop around the site with additional eight inch mains off the feeder along Warner Avenue in order to adequately service the development. Mi M.� 40 i EXHIBIT C ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MAPS for the OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA j ' 1 ' 1 i i 1 f • i rr ws lr.i.r•fL«"f �r1Yw� wr � � - sl.'t—.� r Pi Er ..+lam. � ,•�� •• -' waver w�.t•.YLY y r II '..'ouat I IMPIRac WENTS ., g { off t �Ji.fl.✓,•!• ..� •U �t�iLYi4'J(V� 1� ..�.;a�U �•�i�' � �. � Xf—MP FROM A npj � Y•/.ttr B Y ! � r A E1'� ENt7P � e �, • . U rw � t 40 r �• ••� � J •.1M fw.l 1• • tw••WU t�•f 1 . r i � Ij• � � ij •a►. tj2�, '; r �.� � •� O i� O U v �1 J N USIN JRt ITA `� rJ 2 U. ij Arueereewema""arnaOWan an awwaernaew'e�eeve •-"-1 �•-• OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA I • 142 -C� _r __ WARNER ...• .•o - f IJ 4AC 1ca � �` 1 4 T I 6• I ^ I .1 c11"" , i , T7r he ... 10 Y. ] 1{ '— � SrCA4,ORE f • ,r1 TI ACTT- 1 .• !i'' j _ , t - _ - ____ `_!� r r f It ._ .r.nr •r + n . wo Cj • : CYPRESS ' �- 2 . NARCN /S1'�/ t6 T Ar0.369 M. !S-3! 5-28 IYOT£ - ASS£.r''SOF, <• -. F BLOCK B _ �r -- TRAC M. s i TRACT ND.436 'w.A! 6:-?CEL A"✓.V.9ER5 SC+;,.. tri r'- { PA17CEL Af...P PV. pQ_9 SHOWN !H C1RCt£S 1 r 38 M AVENUE% TRAr fn flo •� :o o c .� � = o34Lo: o ;jo= c tort - • O t ' tv , tq r:L (!-P* 6 O ...« ^n� 18 Lcr l ^ .: O - &or r O C 7rl.jv?A,-T 0 . F .(DD O � p L1 . T J �+/,/�� !i �• ✓ 1• I• Atf� t -rJ j ,T BLIti 2 2 E d s 8LK♦ • s f i r��p11' • f2 rrt rr tOT S � = l: Irr sIr• +94 WOO ! BLK D 9 - •tr cor• 14 or i r-o r s t• .• r.�r Lor c • O O - - r5 '� t 1 30 f •f0 •14, O fs for s h N !S [Qr -r �i t� S t fs fv 'f r2 /1b C 436 = j ALLEY v •+J A►ARCN I979 040TE-ASSESSORS WOCK A A.SSESSOf'S AUP 7FACT NO. 4.36 M.M. f6-28 PARCEL NUAUERS MOM tr,:PAGE 28 TRQ?h4? 10485 MAC 449-34,35,36 SHOWN W a,cus CZX#NTY Or OOANCA !]AQCEL AMP PAf 00-35 . -r � �•r:�"i'"1�`.=�'�t .,J �"r:1,'jF'J;�`l :�`•. •Fi�\:�f�'.1 ! -'.ti.'•�'' Ff!`�:�:� F-���•�:t_I�-�t���� a' r I c' f• KOGFC4 l.ARF + • r - l'^V•1 4 ,y '2 1j, `rl 4 ` � •i 24 rh 1 � la,� 1• • I �I �;,;• if { T 01 1 1 ' r•' 41 ' ,n • r N _ a rV r` C In n n D r r tt 7 n 1. 011 if • N U N I L:1tS1ll/11141 •1 ~1 LI I✓ 1 � •i j •� •1 I . •` •. �' d 1 3Nt•'! NOS7J3)i '� x IjL\ {\I ./�".' CrV� �`-"�: Cad t� �.:/ �n� ( 1• ��' •,,. �j lop N • � 7 y3NV7 snr33noFA 4i �J � • ll f /''� l I L l U I., •1 li rC V r� 1 •� t� .. ,... 13•t,C7 00.170.v y �.... .. ....n..v.....-.�..'.. .. ..... .�.. .. ..,.... ., .... .. .. ._.. ..... ... ... r;. .•. .., . ...i..:!ii,-. :r+.�\��'s .�S".. .;}.•C':a L.'��SI S 22 2= �,� � LANE t•.t£r , a r'. V t O9 a a s �� O.,lo0O. 3 : t F { `I • C v , tS " u1 . Q .� .c•la 2t j� 241 <ttfr �• ►' AC>40C1 }I I sf• ..lw Sc-a:: ws+• �! i� 29: �2E n Ir ii J�-- ' i tt NICHOL S —— r•c J f t I 34 —'__------•� IE r I Tn.:CT No 4091 M. AM. 174 -/O, ASSESS>7S &L.JCrr 9 A.,ESS='S r.F TRACT A0 8703 A! AI 369- 39.40 PARCEL %uMBER: PJ:+ iCS -SE24 5.._w•� rti L'n:LFS �^:;•.Tr C� Cc11_. s t� t�,S' lt � '•��I!-L �'� \ � -t'l�v"'=-,j`� :1.. '='Z��\ �•s�'=:t* dot '�':�t' , ,•.-�►•,,.1\ `..�..;\:.LL 3 r r . al AE! CITY OF tiA. NTIN ""'j ON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►o 1%I T1%01IX From JM �XVRI;,-C w Analyst birrctur or liusiness 6 Industrial Special .))cra uns Div. Oltell)risc Subject Dete Clt1I�8: SIAT1S1'1CS FOR REDL•'VEIAI1,0Xl' JUN1: 15, •1982 ARU\S To determine the incidences of crime for the specified redevelopment areas, a comparison*of calls for service by reporting districts (RD) was conducted from January 1, 1978 through 1981. 'fhe reporting districts for the appropriate redevelopment projects are as follows: Na rt in►; District Itc�l��rlulxcx;nt 461 M;uin - Piar 272 iew Hc rhood 431 Yorktown - Lake 292 Talbert - Beach Huntington Beach is comprised of 140 reporting districts. The following matrix shows i percentage of the total number of reporting districts with fewer calls for service tim the four in question. Re22rtLq-11i s, trig 1978 1979 1980 1981 461 99% 991 991 991 43x�1 9q1-. _91L -M_ 9� 991 99%292 73o out 591 671 As you can see, RD's 461, 272 and 431 indicate the highest number of calls in the City. In fact, in no case were they less than the upper 41 of all reporting districts, with 292 in the: topper ono-third. With the exception of RD 431, those calls for service figures are � very representative of workloads in the respective redevelopment areas. Since tho Police IXpartmont is located in fill 431, many deFt. reports are filed with this Rn number which reveuls an erroneous calls for service figure. If you have further quostion h regurding this study, please contact me at 5943. •� JMJcaI ' cc: Capt. Jenk ins I it I 1 I , 1.7 o `Z INTER-DEPARTMENT ►COMMUNICATION ►tewtl+.G rew 11,4 +► To Frank If. Kelly From Huger llosmer Division Chief Deputy Fire Marshal Subject INCIDENT DATA Date .Tune 22, 1982 The following information is Submitted pursuant to the request for incident data from Tow Tincher. Main-Pier Deveiopwnt Project . 1981 1982 Fire Incidents 1 0 Pon•-Fire Incidents 6 1 Medical Aid Incidents 40 11 Oakviev Nevi ghburhu� od Project 1981 1982 {` Fire Incidents 23 6 , Nan-Fire Incidents 14 1 Medical Aid Incidents 63 16 , Yorktuvn-Lake Project 1981 1982 Fire Incidents 1 1 Nan-Fire Incidents 8 2 Medical Aid Incidents 26 14 'Culbert-lleavlt Pru,ject 1981 1982 i Fire: Incidents 0 0 Non-Fire Incidents 0 0 Medical Aid Incidents 2 2 • ' I RH.,Jh 1 I I REQUEST FuR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACT WN Date September 22, 1982 submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Office` �l Prepared by: Tcm Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise j Subject: APPROVAL OF OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFYING TO AGENCY REVIEW OF FINAL EIR eeSo- # -5-D Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: i? STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached is Agency Resolution No. 50 which makes certain findings concerning the mitigation of any adverse environmental impacts, certifies that all steps required by law for the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and processing of the EIR have been taken, and approves the Redevelopment Plan and determines that the use of l tax increment funds outside the boundaries of the Project Area for the purpose of t providing affordable housing will he of benefit to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 50. ANALYSIS: This act•ionrepresents the final Agency step in the long and complex process which must be undertaken to establish a redevelopment project area. In addition to meet- ing all the legal requirements and proceedings, staff has personally ;ontacted each affected taxing agency and made an effort to discuss the proposed plan with all the existing property owners. An attempt has also been made to inform the general public of these endeavors. As a result of these efforts, we feel the project which you are considering is feasible and that the redevelopment requirements have been .net. T 1TVE �'. ALTERNA ACTIONS: - 4 Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Redevelopment Plan'and EIR (see Council Resolution 5169 and Ordinance No. 2582). CWT:TT:jb I 0/ P!O 418 t .. .. - etc - .iC• ... ..�.e. REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Date August 11, 1982 ..�-- coU U 11-Y C"IN. t; Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment A c�t,�•itovi- JIB_ 19 Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Admi ni stra to, Prepared by: 99Tom Tincher, Director of Business and ndust ial En a rY Subject: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF OAKVM EDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING E1R Statement of Issue, Recorrmendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we have completed, we are now in a posi- tion to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearing at which time the above named Oakview Redevelopment Plan and EIR will be considered for adoption and certification. RECC44MENDATION: Approve resolution setting a joint public hearing with the City Council for 7:30 p.m. , Monday, October 4, 1982. ANALYSIS: Redevelopment Law requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weeks prior to the time at which the hearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August 16 meeting if we are 'to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. I . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting date until some time in the future. CWT:TT:jb �• FINAL FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT July, 1982 I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIR011MENTAL IMPACT REPORT I-1.0 SUMMARY I ?-2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 1-3.0 EXITING ENVIRONMENT 6 '-4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MILIGATION 7 l MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS i I-5.0 ALTERNATIVES 16 i I-6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 16 I-7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 17 I-8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS 17 I-9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 17 I-10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 18 APPENDIX A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19 APPENDIX B, INITIAL STUDY 20 _SECTION II: PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REVIE14 f II-1.0 DISTRIBUTION OF GRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL 30 IMPACT REPORT II-2.0 COMMENTS RECEIVED 30 II-3.0 RESPONSES TO COKNENTS RECEIVED 30 APPENDIX A, DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIX B, PUBLICATION AND NOTIFICATION APPENDIX C, COMMENTS RECEIVED APPENDIX D, LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 80-3 APPENDIX E, FINAL EIR 81-1 r jj l b DRAFT FOCUSED rtNVJRONA'IEh)TAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE OAKVIEW Rf-DEVELOPMENT Pr<CJEC1' May, L982 Transmittal authorized by Redevelopment Agency on May 17, 1982 (^•.esolution No. 29) 1 t „ I-Ul SUMMARY Tire proposed project consists of adoption*of a proposed Redevelopment Plan for l the 58•acre Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of tha plan is to remove existing blight and improve the physical and !economic well-being of the: City of Huntinritnn Beach. Thr, Radrvelopinrnt Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the rehabilitation and infilling of housing the development of commercial and office spare and construction of much needed public improvements. The Plan also provides for assemblage and sale of selected properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, if owners in these parcels are desirous of participating in the project, such participation will be encouraged in conformance with the; Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (rlxcept for owner participants) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment flan. This impact will be largely atteruated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase prico of the selected properties to be acquired at fair market value, (Z) initiating busy negotiations as soon as pre►ctical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Pirin and (3) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agrncy's progress and its activities. The Impact from project implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to be positive over the long terra. Construction of modern well-planned commercial development and the rehabilitation and construction of residential -.� developments will provide an xonomlc and aesthetic Impetus to the ' surrounding areas. Fur•thei rr,.3rt. in achieving such development, existing blighting influences will be irrndicated from within the Project At-ca. Although the project will afford subst.mtial benef,ts to the community over th,. long term, it is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic., noise and dust. However, these. impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to eayliyht hours Lind by rer,uir;nq spray watering its necessary 0 control the impact of crust. Over the long tetra, pmItive Impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result in duveloprnent of rnudern ,arid well-designed conimercirrl wid office facilIties, new housing, public improvements Prid the rehabilitation. of existing residential units which will ellrrain-ate the blightirx4 conditions of tilt! Project Area whiter onhnnring thn s.utal amcial anti crono►nic vitality of the City of Huntington I As prc.,r.ntly rrivisioned, it is the desire: of the Agency to rrht;3liitate and construct approximately 100 residential units and to create approximately 300,000 nquare fee; of new office and commercial devr.lupment over the sans dine pericad. The tM al value of improvements is expected to exceed $35,000,000. Rased upon this proposed activity, Lhe Agnnry anticipates very few, if any, 4) relocation of existing residences. r� Ttir. precise layout of new development, phasing and level of activity is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come beforo the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted if required by C.E.Q.A. The generalized impacts of an additional 100 residential units and a net 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development is discussed In further detail in this report. I-2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared pursurint to the State EIR Guidelines for the Oakview Redevelopment Plan. This :'1R is intended to provide decision makers with useful information on the impac► of . the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to adontion of the plan by the Huntington Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken in implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plan will be subject to further environmental evaluation In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 2.2 Project Location The proposed project, is located in the City of Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile soutrieast of downtown Los Angeles (refer to Figure 1). The proposed Oakview Redevelopment Project as selected by the Huntington Beach City .--. Planning Commission consists of ipproximate,U 68 acres as showq in Figure 2 and as legally de:,cribed In Appendix A. 2.3 Project Objectives As outlined in the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the objectives are to: Eliminate blighting influences, Including deteriorating buildings, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, iradequate public Improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve the overr+ll appearance of existing buildings, streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings, new and old, nre safe for persons and businesses to Occupy. • - Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tencnts within the Project Area to participat^ in the redevelopment activities. - Providinq adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage -new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. - Mitigating develnpnreont limitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Projt-ct Area to such an extent that thev constitute a Serious physical, social and economir: burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to he reversed or n1l,winted by private enterprise acting alone. _2_ . N � c �J .tom• i �— ..�/ — + � + 1 • C ci Ze � v —70 Soft Frs • L rc /ndu r.+. aw •rtas .c.•. _. xr li - as Na rp✓,►:J tO �• i ...c.: tlSC /JurrLKf 20lIt �.• •• t S t \ •:«""• L7 a c-....t :PS akSEl£5 +� t70tf�• ` +8 \a, ..c.t./t/ r ��• OL.r.ta CRnVGE Gdvti?t f4 J 1 r •� it fouir.0ue 57 \� i '•.ro ...I N..r•!Y■t.[. '. iN a.• VO 9t r.-!/1. M. T•....r.+••.!K•t•Ts. `Y • tl`• •J 1 }j ...tr t y Cl !Kr.rrs N►i_ O ct 110,r .4f l ;!f Tea ~- • t Ylli[ ,t,Q -4:21t `_"fCflILL �utlfi iNgfon ' :-�. ILM.' lam- .i.t► 1w,L��l�'s ' 55 • � I '� ••'�• � t lkYlA[ Xl- 'VICINITY MAP s' Y E �� O HUNTINGTON BEACH �'•�`, :_: : FIGURE 1 i 3 ���m tip. 4 M ' 1 �•1 f/t/1/►t / 1 1 1 Mw y .1 j �» _uBti 12 0 ENAll S •r....�,,,..." 0 IL O O i + � tsntt t�. Ad 19 0111 10 1 1•uWtll f••f 1 '�J O i ! O , • IM••.� ow"1 • : ' o +� t O p is y taZ,A AM t ttw t p�•• •O � /o �, n i � t t •. CD v U a •v �.. .1t1 �,.• N U5'IN A l l TA 00 c coo %1 :• O C) -Aev A etr b t tth Mw ■w t>wr r m c u t m t m$r r ttr's art t 013------ •-----""-1 r"' OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA FIGURE 2 - Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. - Providing construction and Pmployment opportunties in the rehabilitation and development of theme facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed commercial/office i facilities. Implementing the: construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as amaster-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area In accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus Assuring the highest design standards and environmental duality. { - Providing for relocation assistance: and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. 2.4 Project Implementation 7o implement the proposed project, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is proposing the following activities within the Onkview Project Area: f I - Possible Acquis!tion and sale of property. - Rehabilitation of structures. - Partir.ipation by owners and tenants through the improvement of their properties or through other opportunties to participate in this or other redevelopment projects. - Reloention ztssistance to displaced residential and nonresidential occupants as required by law. • - Developinent of better parking, landscaping and public improvement concepts and facilities. - Demolition, rlenrnnc:e of prop(�rtins acquired, provide public Improvernemtr., building and site preparation. r - Other- actions as appropriate, including, but not litnited to, actions to I asslst property owners, businesses and tenants in the: Improvements of � their propertirm to carry aut the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. - Possible closure of streets and widening of alleys to provide Improved security and additional open space. L -5- 3 The land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities and building Intensities and standards which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: t i 2.4.1 I-and Uses - Residential. Primarily medium ten high density residential uses including condominium development. - Commercial. Principal uses would include general retail commercial and office facilities. 2.4.Z Principal Streets Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street system. Local street and alley improvements will be installed where necessary. 2.4.3 Population Densities Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 7-15 dwelling units per gross acre for Medium Density Residential development and 25-35 dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. 2.4.4 Building Intensities All commercial, office and residential uses throughout the Project Area shall conform to or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the final Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. 2.4.5 Standards Minimum standards for the Project Area Include current specifications for public works construction, building codes, zoning and subdivision regulations and all other applicable lornl, county and state regulations. 2.5 Project Duration I Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsearegation provisions which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this plan shall he effecti-ie and the provisions of • other documents formulated pursoiant to thin plan may be made effective; for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent Domain proceedings rOvill be limitrd to 12 yrar:; from adoption of the plan. I-3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing environment for the City of Huntington (leach is well documented In the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington reach Chamber of Commerce Community Profile, the Huntington Beach Miscellaneous Historicnl Data and several previous an%1ronmental Impact reports all of which are on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. _ Z l 1\ -6- r.. I-4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EF FLCTS ij This section of the Focused Environmental Impact Report will examine the general impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific impacts of the type of development/redevelopment that is presently envisioned by the Agency. As previously indicated, individual projects that are implemented over the next several years will be subject to further environmental evaluation in accordance with C.E.G.A, 4.1 General Impacts of RedeveloRment As stated in the Preliminary Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, the general impact upr✓,i the residents of the Project Area and up the surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1) blighted areas will be replaced with new or rehabilitated structures, (2) relocation of residents when necessary will be in compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) there will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. However, as described above, this loss would not constitute a significant impact a i the development will be consistent with present zoning and the anticipated uses will be beneficial to the community. In addition to these items discussed In the Preliminary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneficially impact the Project Area by: �) - Providing additional affordable decent, safe and sanitary housing to the existing stock within the City of Huntington Beach. i - Providing adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage new construction and reinvestment by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with a stronc}hr economic base. f - Mitigating development limitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it causes a serious physical, social surd economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private; enterprise acting alone. Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development and rehabilitation of housing and commercial/office: facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of new commercial/office facilities. lmplementinq tho construction or reconstruction of adequate streets;, curbs, nutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a roaster-planned development. Latcrblishi►ig development criteria and controls for the permitted reuses within the Project Area in accordance with modern competitive development practices. �y -7- S The Redevelopment Plar,. as presently envisionod while providing for the assemblage and sale of selected properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency anticipates few, if any, acquisit:ons. However, if owners In these parcels are desirous of participating in the project, such participation will be encouraged in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (Except for owner participants) resuiting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) takinq deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value*, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of tha Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisor] assistance and benefits to all who are displaced end are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample tune for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and Its activities. Although the impact of relocation could be negative, Its long-term impact is expected to be positive in that relocation will afford residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to ca more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The Impact from project implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development of modern, well-plonned industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, in achieving such development, existing blighting intluences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighboilioods will result in development of modern and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditiorn of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. * Under Eminent Domain Law (1263.320), fair market value of the property taken Is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willircg to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity torso doing, or obliged to sell and a huycr, tieing ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the purpases for %v4ich the property is reasonably adaptable and available. When the Agency purchases property, it usually will pay cm-fi. This is of additional benefit to potential displacer. ; when compared to today's "creative finnncinq" type of transaction, where the seller use;ally ends up receiving monthly payments nn a part of their equity. Sellers usually have one additional year to purchase comparable property before they eye required to pay capital gains tax, because most redevelopment transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. i (`'l1 The proposal re.levelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the implementation of the General Plan and its goals and objectives which have guided the development of the City since its adoption. 4.2 Specific Impacts of Presently Envisioned Redevelopment Activities As presently envisioned, it is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause: the construction or rehabilitation of, approximately 100 residential units and to assist in the creation of approximately 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development. The total value of improvements would be approximately $35,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of very few, if any, residences. The precise location of new development, phasinq and level of activity is impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, individual environmental evaluations will be conducted as required by C.E.O.A. The generalized impacts of 100 new and rehabilitated re3idential units and a net 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development can be summarized as follows: *Residential - 100 Units ,.� 1,000 vehicle trips per day increase - I50 parking spaces Increase - 25,000 gallon:.- of sewerage per day increase - 30,000 gallons of water per day increase - 500 pounds of solid waste, per day increase - 110 potential maximum student Increase - 220 population increase i, *Commercial/Officr: - 300,000 Squate Feet 1 ,000 vehiclu trips per day increase • 1,200 parking spaces increase 50,U00 gallons of sewerage per day increasa 60,000 gallons of water per clay increase - 1,50i1 pounds at solid waste per clay increase A population increase of 220 will provably not require the addition of firemen and related crluipment, policemen and reinted equipneen►, and will not roriulre addition.7l educational facilitie.:c or the addition cif sewer and water facilities. Thci rusts for - providing iny required services c:nirld ire provided by the Redevolopmet,t Agency. it is anticipated thrit some: chnngen will be required in tho traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and in the solid waser managunicrit system. The proposed pra;ect would generate about 1,400 r, pounds of emissinn•per day. More detailed information will be required prior to implementation of individual developmcnt projects. t'} Eatimatea have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associates using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. • J e �I i Although it is impossible to project specific activities, 4t is presently envisioned that Agency assistance will be required to implement up to 100 housing units and up to 300,000 square feet of commercial/office development. 4.3 Mitigation Measurrs The proposed Redevelopment Plan is a means to mitigate the impact of blight in the Project Area and Improve the social, environmental and economic conditions In the City. While the project is beneficial, minor adverse Impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered at this stage of the redevelopment process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed In accordance with provisions of the Uniform Building Code ►•ihich governs construction relative to seismic movement. Onsite grading and earth removal will be performed to the satisfaction of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosiun of soils, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the proper engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No unusual mitigating measures beyond the regular controls of the City are proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Air ; As mitigating measures, the Agency will encourage improved circulation, the extension and improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usage, energy conservation, hike routes, paths and open space and green areas. 4.3.3 Water i . Development as proposed by the Redevelopment Plan will create an additional demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher intensity development may requira expanding capacity and improving local- street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a more specific Indication of actual site development plans occur. No specific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.4 Plant Life i The project will remove no significant vegetation since none is In existence. ' Lnndscapinq will neclate the impact of providing an urban land use on currently vacant and redeveloped prnperty. Landscaping is anticipated to be In excess of City standards. 4.3.5 Animal I_i fP The Project Arva is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. L.Indsraping of the Project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhnnce a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. Y -10- i 4.3.6 Noise Noisa levels in the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to increase significantly. Normal construction of building is anticipated to provide a minimum outside-to-inside attenuation of 22d8A which will reduce the inside noise to a level approaching 4503A. No additional mitigation measures beyond the requir-,nents of the Uniform Building Code and the City's Noise Ordinance will be required. i Noise tram traffic within the Project Area .:►11 be reduced because of Agency/City Improvements to road surfacing and traffic control equipment. In addition, implementation of Section 27160 (a) of the `California Vehicle Code ' for auto and truck manufacturers ,vill result in a decrease in noise levels from engines and tires; by 1907 all vehicim must be at levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 Light and Glare Lnndscnp*,ng will "soften" the visual impact of the possible light and glare t resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area. Landscaping plans for i each redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers for approval by the f Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. The City will also exercise sign control and architectural control over the new development in the Project Area. 4.3.8 Land Use i As previously stated, the land uses of the Project Area are proposed to be i redeveloped to mitigatr: blighted conditions. Existing and future residential development will he bLffered from adjacent developments to mitigate any potential conflict from adjacent uses. 4.3.9 Natural Resources Wherever feasible, existing structures and improvements that are scheduled for demolition will be recycled to consr:rvu on the consumption of natural resource. i 4.3.10 Risk of Upset No significant hazard of explosion or hazardous substances Is anticipated. No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.11 Population 1 It Is doubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantially great enough to create a significant adverse Impact ' to the City. It is not rntir_ipated that relocation assistance will be required, hoky-iver, if it ia, relocation activities will be conducted in accordance with State Ia::. -11- f - Relocation Assistance. The Agency shall assist al! persons (including r' families and others) displaced from the project by the Agency in finding other locations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences be necessary to carry out the project, persons displaced from their homes shall he assisted by the Agency in finding housing that is decent, safe and sanitary; within their financial means; In reasonably convenient locations; and as otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency Is authorized to provide housing Inside or outside the Project Area for those persons displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. Relocation Payments. The Agency shall make .relocation payments to persons including families and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses for which reimbursement or compensation is rat otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to thosr: eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make every effort to relocate individuals and families. i - Temporary Relocation Housing. The Agency Is authorized to provide temporary relocation housing on cleared sites within the Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, standard and decent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prior to permanent disposition and development of such cleared sites. If feasible and desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites outside the Project Area rnr providing relocation housing resources. The Agency is also authorized to provide temporary relocation housing in houses acquired by the Agency that are being held for sale and/or ' rehabilitation. i i 4.3.12 Housing. Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of Increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: - That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or increase the supply of housing for persons and families of lo%v or moderate Income households; or - That same stated percentage, less than 20 percent, of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to meet such housing needs; or - i -12- I f ' That :i substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this effort including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for lo%, and moderate income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent. in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Areal because of increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct- or indirect result of implementation of the Redevelopment Flan. 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation Redevelopment will assist in correcting interior circulation resulting in Improved traffic flow and provide Improved access and additional parking for both residential and commercial/office developments. 4.3.14 Public Services c: No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, additional manning of such services as fire protection, building inspections and police protection, etc. will be necessary to maintain the same level of iervice that now exists. 4.3.15 Energy The following energy conservation measures are recommended for the new and renovated structures: - Use of as much solar and alternate energy as is feasible. - Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. - Electric lights should be strategically placed to maxlmize their efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. Elertrical heating in public arxl private structures should be discouraged. 'I Solar assisted heating systems should be encouraged. Deflecting and/or insulatinq glass should be used in structures where windows are 'lot shaded by exterior architectural projections or mature plants. 4.3.16 Utilities No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. -13- 1/ i I r1, � 4.3.17 Human Health r " ! I No mitigation measures are proposed at this tirrie. However, it should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be improved by being relocated into housing that is decent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.111 Aesthetics Architecture and landscaping site plans will be approved by the City. - Incompatible Uses. No use or structure which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor or similar factor would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. i - ff Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels. Parcels in the Project Area, including any parcels retained by a participant, will not be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. Limitation of Building Density. The number of buildings in the Project 1 Area will be consistent with building intensities permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. Limitation on Type and Height of f�uildcngs. The height, type and size of buddinos shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning. building and other applicable codes and ordinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between Stich local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. Open Space, Landscaping and Parking. The approximate amount of open space to be provided in the Project Area is the total of u:l areas which will be in the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the open space around buildings, and all other amounts.of outdoor areas not permitted through limits on land coverage by the Plan to be covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where new construction or rehabilitation occurs shall be submitted to the Agency for review and approval to ensure appropriateness and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets eets and" public and private parking shall be provided for in each development ronsistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time. Any private streets or off-street parking must alsa comply with regulations imposed by the Redevelopment Plan. Light, Ait� and Privacy. In all areas, sufficient space .;hall be maintained hK%%,een huildings and structures to provide adequate light, air .and privacy. V , -14- I i r Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearance by protruding, ove-rhanginj, blinking, flashing, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted In the Project Area. The Agency shall j permit only those signs necessary for identification of buildings, premises, i uses and products asso:sated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shal, be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. } 4.3.19 Recreotia_n The provision of additional open spaca as presently envisioned should improve recreational opportunities. 4.3.20 Archeolog Ica ItHistoricaI Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified Individual will be retrained to Investigate thu significance of the items, catalog i and remove same for further study and preservation. No other mitigation measures are proposed. 4.3.21 Development Standards - New Construction. All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws in effect from time to time including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. I - Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses. Any existing structures within the Project Area which meet the standards for rehabilitation may be repaired, altered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, If necessary, in such manner that will meet the following requirements: f li n Be safe, sanitary one siund in all physical respects. ` . o Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington Beach. Q Shall conform to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. o Shall be comparable in appearance to the architecture of the on-slte proposed new structures. 4.4 Unavoidrnble Effects � The proposed project should improve the community's overall economic situation and, as a result, bring about more job opportunities, increase populntlon and provide a higher quality of life for the residents of Huntington Beach. These factors, in turn, will place a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, hrnrer anti land resources, as well as contribute to air and noise pollutipli. • I The implementation of the Plan will result in tiee rehabilitation and construction of housing structures and construction of commercial/office buildings; the pavement of streets, alleys and parking lots; and the development of other facilities that will probably result in increased rainfall runoff. i During the course of implementing the project, there will be some temporary disruption to normal activities doo to construction. Construction, as well as the prnvision of public improvements, will result in the utilization of certain j natural resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum and lumber. Implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan will result in the acquisition of certain property and the relocation of owners and tenants. 1-5.0 AL.TERNATIVCS f 5.1 No Project The "no project" alternative would allow the Project Area to continue in a blighted condition for an Indefinite period. The application of existing federal, state and local funds is not adeq;iate to significantly prevent existing deterioration or to significantly improve existing conditions. 5.z Smaller Project Area i Designation of 111 smaller project area will not achieve the objectives of the ("Redevelopment Plan or eliminate the blighted conditions. 5.3 Larger Project Area Fstetibtfshment of a larger project area would require more extensive investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not necessarily enhance the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plan's Objectives. I-6.0 LOCAL SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS The Redevelopment Plan provides policy direction in the establishment of land use categories in accordance with the General Plan. The Plan further provides for the acquisition of property, rehabilitation and construction of structures; relocation of some families; installation or reconstruction of streets and alleys, utilities and other site improvements; and financial methods for implementing the project. The Redevelopment Plan Is designed to provide direction for the transition from present short-Loren policies to the long-ranee goals and objectives of Huntington iieach. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective for 35 years. Not to implement the Plan at this time would be to intensify the conditions of blight and deterioration that exist within the Project Area. if implemented, the Plan would arrest these conditions over the long-term, and would help promote the economic and physical well-being of the City of t-luntington Beach. -16- ; -71 Concerning underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects will be a loss of open space and some resources. The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, relocatirn of households and j construction and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon e:asting 1 plans, the intensity of residential development will increase and will result in ' additional congestion. Noise and air emissions In the Project Area would likewise Increase. 1-7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS Although the project will result in the utilization of certain resources such as sand, petroleum and lumber in the construction and Implementation of its various proposals, and will t-esult in the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, It !s unlikely that the impacts of the implementation of the project would result in any more adverse environmental changes than would the continued growth of the City under normal conditions. In ftact, by concentrating the development and making the improvements called for in the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed irretrievably to urbanization. Th!s project basically uses land ' already { committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the steps outlined in this report. i I-0.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as a series of events in casual sequence beginning with job creation: The creation of new jobs then leads to job shifts and vacancies, followed by immigration and a de and for shelter. This, In turn, is followed by an ordaring of land usrs and a shifting of m the spatial configilration of the labor c:upply. The shifting of the location of the supply of labor is a stimulus for the new location of business and other economic activity creating jobs and starting the growth cycle over again. The regional growth cycle constitites the source of the demand for the construction Of private and public facilities. The actual physical pattern of the growth In the City is the result of the chronological order and size in which specific parcels of land are developed. The relatively Small size parcels have limited the growth and development possibilities In the Project. Area. The consolidation of parcels In the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden the possibilities for more intense development rind growth. Tile implementation of thn project will have n growth inducing Impact to thv City by increa.,floa the population by about 220 persnns. The proposed project I will expand the hausirrg stock of the City by about 100 units and will increase:employment oppartunities. I-9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environrnentni impneu, Identified In the Initial Study as insignificant ..�.� (Appendix Ci) included primarily those related to land, water, plant and animal i life, human health and archaeological/hIstorical. These impacts were dismissed primarily because they are not. affected by the proposed project. a I10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, April , 1982. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Proposed Redevelopment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air uality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports, SLAG. 10.5 Geotechniral Inputs, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources Survey and Inventor Huntington Beach, California, Archaeologicay Research, Inc. , April , 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendment, EIR 80-3, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services. j! 10.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. ` 10.9 Final EIR 81-11, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services I NOTE: A11 pertinent information contained in Land Use Element Amendment 80.3 AAppp'endix "D") and Finial EIR 81-1 for the Beach Boulevard-Warner Avenue Office Commercial Complex (Appendix "E") is by reference incorproated herein. I Concerning underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects mill be a loss of open space and some resources. The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, relocation of households and construction and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the intensity of residential development will increase and will result In additional congestion. Noise and air emissions in the Project Area would llikewise Increase. f 1-7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS i Although the project will result in the utilization of certain resources such as sand, petroleum and lumber In the construction and implementation of its various proposals, and will result In the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, It is unlikely that the impacts of the implementation of the project would result in any more adverse environmental,changes than would the continued growth of the City under normal conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the Improvements called for In the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed Irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land ' already committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the steps outlined In th!s report. 1-0.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS The process of regional growth can be c,3nerally outlined as a series of events In casual sequence beginning with job creation: The creation of new jobs then leads to job shifts and vacancies, followed by immigration and a demand for shelter. This, In turn, Is followed by an order!ng of land uses and a shifting of the spatial configuration of the labor supply. Tile shifting of the location of the supply .of labor Is a stimulus for the new location of business and other Ieconomic activity creating jobs and startiny the growth cycle over anrin.. The regional growth cycle constitutes the source of the demand for the construction of private and public facilities. The actual physical pattern of the growth In 1 the City Is the result of the chronological order and size in which specific parcels of land are developed. The relal:ively small size parcels have limited f, the growth and development possibilities in the Project Area, The consolidation of parcels in the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden the possibilities for more intense development and growth. The implementation of tile; project will have; a growth inducing impart to the City by incrensicig the population by about 220 persons. The: proposed project will expand the housing stock of they City by about 100 units and will Increase employment opportunities. I-g.Cl INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environmentni impacts identHled in the Initial Study as insignificant (Appendix B) included primarily those related to land, water, plant and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. These impacts were dismi,sed primarily because tile;, are not affected by the proposed project. _17_ 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Pincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project, April , 1982. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Proposed Redevelopment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports, SLAG. 10.5 Geotechnical In2uts, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory, Huntington Beach California, Archaeological Research, Inc. , April, 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendment, EIR 80-3, Huntington Beach Department of Development Sery c ees. 10.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. 10.9 Final EIR 81-1, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services i NOTE: All pertinent information contained in Land Use Element Amendment 80-3 Appendix "D") and Final EIR 81-1 for the Beach Boulevard-garner Avenue Office Commercial Complex (Appendix "E") is by reference incorproated herein. i f I • �1 -1B- -4 LEGAL J!-S R1PTIO?: OAKVIEw AREA PRO3J:C'I' t That portion of Suction 26, Towti;hip 5 Sough, lta119c: 11 1tie:.t, in the Rancho La Boll: Chica and the Ranch; Las Iiolsas, City o� HuntingtonDeach, County of Orange, State or California, as shown on a maa recorded in Gook 51, page 13 of -Miscellaneous t•Ia- s the County Recorder described as follows; `�•' yn the Office of Beginning at the east otle-quarter corner of said Section 26, thence South 89° 24 ' 16" West 463. 11 feet: to a ?.)oint on the southerl longation of the east line } pro- in width, 30 feet either side otfecenterline son Lane, a street being GO Feet i said point being the True Point of Beginning; thence alon said southerly y prolongation South 0° 45' OG" East 40 feet to the soutll line of Slater rlvenite, a street 80 feet in width, 40 feet either side of centerli.tte; thence South 89° 2.1 ' 16" S9Lst 1197 feet along said sauth line to the %•rest line of Tract No. 9091; thence alarm said west line Nortit 0° •14 ' 31" West 700 feet to the north line of said Tract 4091; thence along said line North 8g° 2 1 3 I Last 300 of t Feet to the' southorly eat unsio7 he wLst line of par. I,allc, a sLrc:et briny 60 i'.?t.'t in %•1; feet dither side of centerline; thence North 0 , 44 •16 ►:G.ltll, 30 feet along said southerly extension, the west: line of Oak Latic0al its northerly extension to a line parallel With and GO feet ttorthd measured at right angles from the centerline -of Warner Avenue; along said parallel line North 89 2, East 13BG feet to the then%,.' centerline of Beach Blvd. , said street being 132 feet in width, Gr, feet either side of centerline; thence along said centerline South ; i7° 45' 14" East 99G feet; thence south ago l5' 00" West 263 feet; thence South 00 45' 11 Eilst 28[1 Luc_t; thc:ttcc South 89° 15, �, h, 20 feet; thence Soutar 0° 00 West .1r� 14 Last 96 feint to o thy eas sion of Lht! north III,,! ti rly eaten-- af. Trac:t No. 89113; thenco along saki north line, SouL11 119" 25 r, l)U•,� M1'1.., J t 7l) J:t?e't % t the ►past ling' cif Ash Street, ' a stl't'l:l O).)t'ltt�t 60 f0k.t. .111 Widtll 30 2 , _ fet t. t.i ter' sicit� c�f cent-orl I'll l:ltt�ttc:e aluu,t said t�.lst: .I into South t)° 4.1 ' .16" z' concave ilol:LhuasLorly ilc,%;itltj zl r•7clitls Uf 50 tcast Iip feet to a Curt•a curvu southerl l t-nce «_or.,, said ..., }• and 5c�u t:ileas t:e:1.-1y an arc thru a cc'l:t ral. a:1910 of 361 52 ' di�t:atic._ of 32. ',20 fcr�t to westerly a poitlt oll al rcvOrse curvu conca%,i: having 1 f� a radius of 50 foeL, a radial said point. ))cabs i•;orth 520 13 ' � 02" east; thCI:CC a1o11(; acI.(l L'CVi.I'.S(? CUrI.'C 5oli4herlt', and soutllwest.erl, thru a central angle of 780 5.1, ' 35" an arc distant::� of 68. 86 feet to a c Wo POullC► curve concave nort}l;:c;teJ'Iy having a radius of 35 feet, al radial to said. Goint hear!: South 480 42 ' '23" east; thence aloncT said rot.,ipound Curve :,Clllt1l4:CSLC1.'1y and l•JCsterly ti1rU a central antjlu of 481 11 ' 23" , an arc distance of 29 . 44 fueL to a oolnt on the soutll line 01 Malldrell Drivc being 60 feet in width, 30 feL:4 eittler Side, of centerline; thence along said sou"th line south 890 29 ' 00" West 11. 8 feet to Ole east l,:ne of Lra-lct i:o. 4301; thence along said mentioned east line South 01 441 46" east 270 feet to a point on anon-tangent curve concave southwo-ster. Iv llaviI g a ra dills CAI 70 feet, :;aicl Point l)ein(T On the north line Of 13arL0I1 Drive and the east line of Queens Lane; thence along Said curve anti oast- line southeasterly and southerly thru a centrall ancile of 770 441 59" -in arc distance O: i 95 Feet; thence Sout]) 00 44 ' 52" East 2? feet- to al curet? concave nort})- easterly !laving a radius of 70 foot; thenc,? continuing nicllr, C. c:aSL 4 i lane of Queens Lane and Said ll,a;lLionod curve southerly alit] SOL'UleaSterl;' thru a Cent:all angle of 2711 .113 ' 00" •111 ajrc C71Siali:i'+� of 34 foot t-o al reverie C1irv0 Cnl)V,1vQ "outhortsLur o. '111�) .1 of I,i0 feet, 11 ralcla.11l to said point boars, *1C►l.'Lh 611 37 ' 01:" 1:i1'Cl.; C]1C11[ri •llon�l S.11 „ reverse cu rvo ;oil t;lleal s ter. 1.y .11)r} ;;nu Cher l v t 11r11 ,1 C'C,I L'1'al i angle OI /` ;8 ( Qua all arc Cll'talllco of 63 fee:; Lb nor' 11 .11710 Of Tract •3.1 `3 ` l !1^I'.+:aS along said north lil;Q 1':Or. th 1190 ?': ' 35" L.a:,L 125 f(,et to Cile east "lle of 'Pratt '1153; tl10I)CC A1011 l sCid Cast. line 500 feet; thoncc North 89° 24 ' 10" East 197 foot: t:a t;he cast Ii;:i? Of lSeQ1SCti11 11a10; thhilC:` r11011(l li•11C1 Ci1St llllr' alJ'(2 : �� f.Clllthl_'ri �' j7: 17- i lon��altian iGt) •`(-, L to Hl"! 'IT1.10 Point: of Be'lillnin,). i f U i •3 •;i v�� J 3 .J• O � � f �. � ` �, I•r..�.r - -� ar I TUB a II.A040Eri1`5 'i"-••�.. }« did THIS PORTION OF PROJECT AREA IS EXEMPT FROM ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE OEVELOPMENT PURPOSES 1S� �1• j P—_� I ji. fL11 .,ty �.: .rw•��►•� "...•.�•�� ram+'.-.• � • 't w IU G) U „I D. I I To EllCo :; aj s �—•- 44 VA 'o H US I t; I'A I 1 TA� • :, _.,..,_ 1. _�' 1. ''._.. !:n.ti n —a.� ZT ' Araq�c�t Ems=It aA0=fawlII=raxlL='jawra��•-- i �,...� OAKV 1 EW 4E 1 GI BOR1100D I REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 1 I /'mot PIUNd ADMINSTRATIVE RIQLII.ATIa —) Appendix WITII TNi il:R!'TARY Of STAT[ , (rumiant to Govemmont Code Sedlsn 11310.16) .e -25- 55• Appendix J is added to read: APPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATIO14 T0: City of Hunt in ton Beach FROM: Huntington Beach Redeveloumment (Responsible Agency (Lead Sency _Agency i 20a0 Main Street 2oOO Main Street A dress MUM Huntington Beach, California 92648 Huntington Beach, California 9264'.' SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report The Huntingto.-i Beach elopment Aggnry will be the Lead Agency and will prepare • an environmental impact report for, the project identif:.ed below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope ind content of the environmental Information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibi_itles in connection with the proposed project . W Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project . . !� � t The descriptions project p , location, and the probable environmental i effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initia. F Study /x is, /"7 is not, attached. c Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be i = sent at the earlieot possible date but not later than 45 days after $ receipt of this notice. ; . Please send your response to Tom Tincher• at the address ahown above. We will need the name or a con act person in Your agency. I PROJECT TITLE: JAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: HUNTiNGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE Apri 1 9 Si gnat ur Y',,;�f Title Executive Director Telephone .1714) 536-5575 Reference: California Administrative Code, Title 14 , Sections 1503�,_' , 15054 .3, 15066. -20- ,••� coNtwu��oM Mrur P'1 A HUNG AmmisimnY! RCauwto"s WFIN THI WMANY Of iTATs ttrn�l!�Onwr�+a G�+1wMa i 1�1i0.1) 74. Appendix I is added :o read: APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead.Ageney) I. BACKOROVND 1. Name of Proponent Hunting ton Beach Redevelopment Agency _ 2. Address . arid Phone MUFF or Proponent: , QnO k trre„et/P.Box 190......_.`�..._.,._., 3. Date or Checklist Submitted .. May 5, 1492 I 4. Agency Requiring Checklist ,,n Qecy �. ?tame of Proposal, if applica a "�`�"' " 0akX_Jgg. Yelo, .&ut.Ple;�....�.w._ ,.... j I1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS r� (Explanations of all yesrr "maybe"mayben answers are required ?, on attached sheets. ) e YES MAYBE N s 1. Earth., Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth. conditions or in changes In geologic substructures? _.._ .X { 8 b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? X as Change in topography or ground : surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any•i.ricrease in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation. deposition or erosion •19 which may modify the channel of a rive,x or stream or the bed of the oaear or any bay, inlet or lake? • X CONTINUATION SHIRT I-A FI1,I1`02 ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIOfvS WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE (FYnve"I to Onn►omoal Code Section 11310.1) t • I YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 1 2. Air. Will the proposal, result In: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient quality. .i p r � X r F. b. The creation of objectionable odors? _.._. X c. Alteration of air movement, , moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? I � 3. Water. Will the proposal result ins a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes- in absorption rates, drainage pattersn, or the rate • and amount of surface water runoff? X � i" S c. Alterations to the course or f10W of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface it water in any water body? X e. Discharge Into surface waters, or In any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to termperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X C. Change in the quantity- of ground waters$ either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through Interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X -22- it , CONTINUATION WIT ON FILING ADMINISTRATIVE ARGULA•s.dNS WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE (PVrM*I is OwnfMwMI CW*WIN 11310.0 YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available For public water supplies? X J. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number cif any species of plants (incicrops,idmicroflorn and aquatic ueplants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X 1 e. Introduction of new species or . plants into an area, or in a barrier ` • to the normal replenishment of f existing species? X i d. Reduction 'in acreage of any agricultural crop? ..� _ ( , Animal if I, e Will t 5he ro oaal P p result n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species t of animals (blyde, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic or aniame, insects or microfaunal? �X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X } c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration oo movement of animals? ...,,. �X i d. Deterioration to existing fish i or wildlife habitat? I� •••�.•� ^ CONTINUATION SPIST R FILING ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATEo(O'*1 i WITH THE SECRETARY of STATE (Punwest h 0ovotement Code Sodlon 11360,91 r YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? I b. F.xposjure of people to severe t j noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. W111 the proposal produce new g t or glare? X _ Be land Use. Will the propo:xrAl result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use or an area? X ' ...�.� � t�t 9. Natural resources. Will the propoaar result n: N a. Increase in the rate of use of M i any natural resources? X t, • b. Substantial depletion' of any nvirenewable natural resource? X k 10. Risk of Upset. Does the. proposal X '16volve a r si c of an explosion or o the release of hazardous substances _ (including, but not limited to, oil, peuticiden) chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or It upset conditions? r 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate or the human popu- lation of an area? X 12. Housing, Will the proposal affect c. UR s ng hoilsing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Trans portation/Circtilation. Will the proposal result In: a. Generation of substantial. addi- tional vehicular movement! X I -2a- i CONnNUA11CM oil" JR FRINa AOMINISTRATIVII Rf0ULAj,HS WITH THI 111CRITARY OF ITATI YESMLYBE NO b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new Parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of ' People and/or goods? ; Xr e. Alterations to waterborne, rail j or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? y ;> 14. Public Services'. Will the proposal ave an a e�'cf'"upon,, or recult in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the 4 f h following areas: `� g r, a. Fire b. Police preaction? g C. Schools? d. Parka or other recreational !=' facilities? c. Maintenance of public facili- ties, Including roadst r� 1 f. Other governmental cervices? + 15. Ener ,. Will the � --- .— prQpoaal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or anergy? .� .� X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, :r or require the development: or new I sources of energy? 1 X ` -z5- ... :.T. .. ... .. ... •r. �- .. .. ... -.-.. .. . .... .....rr--...- �.+... ..•++r.,.y .....;.ti7aT.wt 11+.i1�l.ssw^�. J 4 Yv1.11• YIIIIVA M..1 • 11('11LINO AOMINISTRA71VI 29GULAVOt0 WITH THE $101TARY OF VATS (IYQYfM to 00worso"I Coos Wool 11360.1) y� i YES MAYBE NO 16, Utilities. Will the proposal result In a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities; a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? , X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? —X f. Solid waste and disposal? X `t 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result n: a'. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health ? X >c b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result c n e o s ruction of any scenic s vista or view open to the public, or $ will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X lg. Renreation. Will the proposal result 1F an act upon the quality or quantity of existinE recreational opportunities? X 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result- in an aTFeration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X -26- ,_ ct�nnv�noll w11T DR PIUND ADMINIiTRATM RIGULAI W ffJ4 TNI iKAVARY ON iTAT1 (frewad h 00"" "S CO&MNtwl llsfti1 `t ti 0 21. MAndatory Findings 21 �,Sianificance. (a) Doer the project have thv, potential i to degrade the quality of the environment, f uubstantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining j levils, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important womples of the major 'perioda of California history or prehiNtory? b. Does the project have the poten- tial to achieve short-tern, to, the disadvantage of long-term, envlron- __1 mental goals? (A short-term Impact i = on' the .environment. ,-., one which �- occurs in a rZrIatively brief, definitive period of time while " long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) a': Does the project have impacts 1 which are individually limited, $ but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resourcee where the impact an each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the ti total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) x d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X ITI. DISOUssION OF MIRONM NTAL EVALUATION 1 -Z1- . .. , . GOKnNUAnOW SHIST R FILING ADMINISTRATIVI RIOULATf :s WITH THI SICRETARY OF STAYS (h"Venf ft 061st n Ont Code SKKon 113503$ IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: L7 I .find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. i L7 I find that although the proposed project could have a. significant effect on the, environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the: mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have- been added 'to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. LU I find the proposed project .MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Is required. Date: April EL.. g$? Signature) z Charles W. Thomp on f• i For _-Htintinntpn beach Redevelopment Agenc.y { YQ i U R f • i i • i - I .tiJ � -ZB- i PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REVIEW } L E t i• i� a J� r ttI I —29_ i+_�:i:Ttiii+T iI7.=.'1b:.•.."'jy7Tt'}:i�L .i i I1-1.0 DISTRIBUTION OF DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT REPnRT r 1.1 Mai•ling and Distribution Copies of the Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report were distributed to the persons and agencies listed in Appendix A. 1.2 Publication and Notification Notice of availability of the Draft Focused EIR was published in the Hunting- ton Beach Independent Review on May 29, 1982 (see Appendix 0). A Notice of Completion was filed with the Secretary of Resources, The EIR review period ; was from May 24, 1982 to July 7, 1982. Each last known assessee will be notified of the public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan. 1.3 Public Hearing ra The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the EIR and the Redevelop- ment Plan. Each last known assessee within the Project Area will be notified , . of the subject hearing. 11-2.0 COMMENTS RECEIVED 4 ` Comments were received frum the agencies and individuals listed in Appendix C. '1 II43.0 RESPONSES TO UYV ENTS RECEIVED 3.1 Generill Response The Public Works Department and the Environmental Review Board indicated that the subject Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report seemed to be general in nature and did not provide enough specific information on each proposed develop- 1 ` ment upon which to base specific comments. At,.the present time the .Redevelop- € ment Agency does not have specific development proposals upon which more thorough evaluation can be presented. For this reason, the Draft Environmental Impact Report took a general look at what could happen within each Redevelopment Area and prepared as much information as possible. After adoption of the Redevelop- ment Plan, the Agency will be working with developers and owner participants to attempt- to establish specific projects. These specific projects will be subject to further environmental evaluation. The Redevelopment Plan is a legal document which establishes the Redevelopment Area and gives the Agency certain powers and duties within that area. The Redevelopment Plan is a plan to make imprcvements and establish the mechanisms to initiate those improvements, but is not a specific plan or -development or plot 10,111. 3.2 Conanents Received [lot Requiring Response Crnlunents Providing general infol7natien which will be considered by the Rede- volop.,vtnt Agency and the City Council or which do not require formiai response were received from thi! following: i . Iluntinoton Beach Police Department . Metropolitan dater District - Environmental Planning Branch • f- i -30- I . Metropolitan Water District - Engineering Branch . Orange County Transit District . General Telephone Company ' . U.S. Department of the Interior . County Sanitation Districts of Orange County . Department of Water Resources 3.2 Public Works Department As specific development proposals are presented to the Agency, traffic and fl public improvements will be evaluated. i Accbrding to the Land Use Element Amendment 80-2 (page 40), a portion of the 0akview Area water mprovements is n nee o general upgrading and is now ' only adequate for domestic use. The Oakview Area is also missing needed capital improvements including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting and asphalt. This is one of the reasons for redevelopment of this area. 3.3 Environmental Review Board As specific plans are developed, substantial consideration will be given to required public transportation,. public facilities, water availability, y sewering requirements, utilities and landscaping. Where possible, the /lgency { � will encourage ,the use of solar energy technology and will encourage the water conservation recommendations of the State Department of Water Resources (contained in this Final EIR). The Agency will support the goals acid objec- tives of the Orange County Solid Waste Management Master Plan particularly as .those goals affect the recycling of solid wastes. The City Council will continue to take those actions necessary to provide adequate police and fire protection to all of its residents. The taxes that are presently being paid to the City by the property within they proposed project areas will continue to be received by the City. The new taxes paid by more intensive use of the project areas will go to the Agency. �s These new taxes paid are commonly referred to as tax increment. 3.4 State Department c:f Transportation {p The Oakview Redevelopment Project is located approximately 3 miles Past of Meadowlark Airport (see Figure 1) and should not be affected by noise or �..; safety. Any multi-story buildings which are required to do so will be submitted to the Department of Transportation for approval . -31- jr u • � Ky s � • I ` i I S d 1 •a 1 ,• -. ~~• - ♦ < Marti • t ~, `�a f _ 1 FIGURE I MEADOWLARK. AIRPORT IN RELATION-7U REDEVELOPMENT AREAS f i APPENDIX A DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1 I i f t l i -33- �:,T:... ........�y...'.«'Zia r•... . ............__..... .�_, _ _... _..._. _.,.. ._.. ..... __ '.. .. �r......__........�..._....w.-.....v.-:,-c._... �..�:'�"'�.r�i�iai f ' 1 May 20, 1982 i SUBJECT: TALBERT-BEACH, OAKVIEW, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS Enclosed are copies of the Draft EIR4s for the above named projects. The review period has been established for 45 days between May 24, 1982 and July 7, 1982. Any comments you may have will be incorporated in and re- sponded to in the final EIR's, Thank you in advance for your consideration of these documents. Any ques- tions you may have can be directed to me at the number below. :Sincerely, Tom Tincher, Director Business and Industrial Enterprise TT:jb ' enclosures { ,I , I rI i -34- j ---._............ ..,.�...--.......--..«..............._..............._..... ... .. ._ .. . .... . .._. �............ .�..,......•. . ..,. s.tc.lw.tt,a wYV..•••at]ri�-w"""""'� Y CIR Distrinution List: No. Copies Date Sent r` State Clearinghouse 10 1400 loth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Attn: Terry Roberts .County of Orange 1 Environmental Management Agency Environmental Services Division 811 North Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92701 South Coast Air Quality Management District 1 9150 Flair Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 SCAG 1 6GO South Commonwealth Ave, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90005 O.C. Library District 1 li 431 City Drive South Orange, CA 92668 O.C. Transit District 1 0.900 No. Main SO P.O. Box 688 ' Santa Ana, CA 92702 O.C. Vector Control. District. 1 (' P.,O. Box 87 Santa Ana. CA 92702 Attn: Gilbert L. Challet �t Southern CA Edison Co. 1 390 East 17th St. , Unit E Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Attn: J.E. Kennedy Pacific Telephone 1 1695 Weft Crescent, :. .lte 300 Anaheim, CA 92801 Attn: Art Arthingtor. So. CA Gas Com,'.: ., 1 James Decker, Distfi;:•t Manager a P.O. Box 1017 Laguna Beach, CA 92652 Michael F. Knapp 1 17692 Gainsford Lane !' , j Huntington Beach, CA 92649 -35- L•.......«. ..:1: ... :`......«..-. .......... ..... .. .....-. _.-._ .. .... .._ . .- _. ._. _ .. .-.... . .....-....._...........-,...,.�.....w....•r.r•n.ra..'o«•►mvrKr,w� League of 'Women Voters 1 Attn: Sherry Baum 815 Catalina Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 Hunt. Bch. Chamber of Commerce 1 18582 Beach Blvd. , Suite 224 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ft-mtown Merchants Guild 1 Attn: Larry Recht, Pres. 224 Main St. H.B. , CA 92648 Amigo de Bolsa Chica 1 Atto: Phoda Martyn 17041 Courtney Lane H.B. , CA 92649 r, South Coast Regional Commission 1 666 E. Ocean Blvd. , Suite 3107 P.O. Box 1450 Long Beach, CA 90801 , Gen. Tele. Co. of CA Orange Division Headquarters 7352 Slater Ave. ► H.B. , CA 92647 Connie Mandic 1 1112 Main St. H.B., CA 92648 City Administrator Charles Thompson City Attorney I Gail Hutton Community Services 1 Vince Moorhouse Police Department L i Earle Robitaille Fire Department 1 Chief Ray Picard Don Noble 5 Public Works ---�, r -35- 1 ' City Cleric 3 O.C. Admin. Offices 1 Alicia Wentwurth 10 Civic Center Plaza ' Santa Ana, CA 92701 City library 2 7111 Talbert Av. , CA 92648 Attn: Reserve Desk James Palir 1 Development Services Florence Webb 1 Acting Deputy Director s Savoy Bellavia 1 Senior Planner Planning Commissioners 1 City Council 7 H.S.E.S.D. 1 735 14th Street H.B., CA 92648 • H.B.U.H.S.D. 1 1025: Yorktown Ave. H.B. , CA 92646 O.C. •F1ood Control District 1 Environ. Manage. Agency 400 Civic Center Drive nest Santa Ana, CA 92702 O.C. Sanitation District Admin. Office 10844 Ellis Avenue F.V., CA 92709 O.C. hs::ssor ' 625 N. Ross I Santa Ana, CA 92702 ( O.C. Auditor-Controller 1 ?; 630 h. Broadway ;s Santa Ana, CA 92702 Metro. Water Dist. of So. CA 1 Headquarters. Bldg. 1111 W. Sunset Blvd. L.A. . CA 90012 Attn: Glen H. Smith s Environ. Planning .Branch Ocean View School District 1 f Admin. Office 16940 "B" Street H.B. , CA 92647 -37- i , I ows 1 APPENDIX B PUBLICATION AND NOTIFICATION I 1 -38` r: O: APPUM C State of CAUtornla The Rewurcae A6enq SECRETARY PM RESOURCES 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento) C&Utornla 93814 NOTICE OF COMPUTION FORM , � r ect Title Oakview Redevelopment flan ;E t'COU on pec Inc approx. west of Beach Boulevard; south of Warner Avrnue; north of Slater Avj� n+,p. r � act ton tr Noject mc-at on ounty f 160165 ; 4sdntY 2f Qran4e.._.�„ Descriptione turet Purpooes and Beneficiaries o ect 1 The pro�//�osed -project consists of redeveloping the oro ect area to remove 4rrM.Yirirrll.iiy�..�r�r__.:... �..i-.g �_..�..r. ■Irr.r_.�rr.w h]iQhh& and gr„gatpnew_deyelopmClIt. , The,project will benefit the cit�of /...-` Huj3tingjgnRPA&h .and al)rofj js r S`� 1 C _ r t jk i t aid er'%Y N On Huntin un Beach Redevelopment Agency here copy *I ELR is Avauable � �QV it �n iaa .r P -�.��rm►r.rr r_rta ur�i i_� _..��rr irrr� -- rwrwr. f tju( tin_ntQn Bear „- Ca,lifgi;nia 9264E Review rwirl May 24 to JulL 7 1982 Contact Nrion rea a Mne I xtenf n 1 Tom Tinrher _714 536-5542 Yll.r.�/rlrr.M.\Ypr.I�.M ...�lr\ _rrq■IYrr.�_�.�. 103 j i ' -39- i I%lily. Superior Court "F 11W ti'i'A'I'F.(IF CAI.IF'1IIfNIA In and Lu the 0misles of IlranKr CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT Sale of('ablornla 1 CaunlyUf OWtt lot QITQI r� i APRIL L. ELLIOTT N 1 Thst(►m and at all timta hrnin mmuunrs)W a.4 l•stuen ul lrs� r Cho United tiutes.liver the age of lwrnit line crar..and Ihal I 44lt _ am not a ttv In n.nose tnitrted in the slr,►r enistlyd nsatter. that 1 Am the printsl►al clerk of she prtnlet oil Ihr swine of 1i1e�q HUNTINGTON BEACH I ND. REVIEW tttltrt' ' tli l a"r W6W so a newspaper of grnrrsl s trculatiun,puhh.hed In clot t'ln 44at e+1M+aM / Il KeYWYa irate �M r^, HUNTINGTON REACH Aaw�wr.Ft N+r1+an 1Nl�ad G�at��w1► Cosunty lit Orange and Which neastwpsr is pulblsshenl b.r the A M a11ad* dlsemmaltun sit b:al news and setrlilgens a of a arurral chars M w��6*4v cis~ f let. and which newrpalser at all timem herrin lnrntlr.rsefl ha.) tl�kIIM, and still hu a tame ride autascnptiun list n1 patlnK.ulrcrihrra, t' sRsuaa 11111111wr1eY sit and which nrsrspaper has twin reabluhnl. printrd and pub swat Aa.ar.p w`� Isshrd at regular tntrrvals in the said Count of Orange (sit a Qill perud escetdnyl lint vrat. that the noodle, tit which the WW13- AwL gy" annestd ss a printed copy. has been puhlsahtcl sic the regular and entice ssaue of said newspaper.and nut In and supplense si thrit•o1,son the fulluwing data,to wit. MAY 29t 1982 i 1 ' I cvndy lilt deelatel under lnnalty 4 t.equry that the furelu ing's true and nsrrect. [law GARDEN GROVE ! ..... ...... ............ ± Callfurnsa.lhj# ..ist day ofJUN.... ly ,82 I signature -40- --,_.rap r, FEDERAL GRAPIT Ar— (CATION/AtVAI1Il NOTIFIrA I ION I ' ""•" " STATE OF CALIFORNIA S••kTC CLEARINGHOUSE 1911�)_aq'� ()1, .1 ___ 1 I^ 02 � 24 ,tt!•,, t �► rrtnl CIKIr,I trtlnv t.rt'l.,Ln••.t 7rIp/qAl l►trtl.� 1 XIl<LI - rpen►teuone Unit A.AdDItESi . St••u n,r n nn. City of Huntington"Beacn' 2000 Main Street 4,COUNTY 7STATt A 7,t rn It rl P11M:11Tt[/NO ICstetopoll,rilln,nt,l. _: Huntington Beach.. . :, Orange I CA 9264ELw w a.TV Of ACTION TYPE OF CHANGE ICo,notele IIt10 o nr tot wet c%otr►ionl IT 1p 1 If,t,rrr.►•' tt�A7}Nevr a 1_J MbdN1II11tlA.•.' 1 0Intllelpn001Hr1 • r❑�IAL►•HeMa,,r•nns . 1r-�nlwtrStnM[n/>r �tiJ l.•aAlInW11Rn ' 6 0OetllNed Dh11Irt b trJparttgd p•••r�== h �,1 Cewre„titnn � t•, Yt , rno 1 19.Ar/LICANT TYr6 7uttl•, •►OUfstlpll«Clt L 0• .t•t u ,r I-• ,• . ) lnlet Lt►tet (may��•�� +1•AEPUESTED FUND STAIIT•' tSGA<.+.+ A itltl F. lthdet O,1tt.tt 1 A l;,t /rht•Al so,FUII03 DURATION ..irrjUdithill 11. Iynln1t111 � (%I camvi wmig ikeu,...AI•••rrl 7` Iofto Qlx �1 . �.. 71111h111p�111 ,N. SOonlnl/dOrp.w•ter,e• 77 aWill,t ESt•r11D�ECt/TART i ' ., ;:dAww '.y�rl IMIIEA 1 7t p►w(. 1 Is A.Elt.Fr»D�Ect nuAAtlbN }� III+tbAl+tN•, ':E.'cil>C' 1 'u. 05Mr ISarIIt Ih nt..I„�7t ►dra '�+�► 77�1, I )l....�,__�. :eroltlEF TITLE OF �; , • 1'. I ,. AIrLICANT'fa►ItO�E�.fll�Q��.r��I4V'•t?4�/,tRQd� �lo Ye11�fP�1'erls , oEfeftlrTIO14 of rrur. rl A fin,eTApuril tt►) -- �.•i a r. i1 •,1'�1j 1��I.i' , T � �•!>',ItI The proposed;,p631,t. t:ti tl-il is• df',rea6 I Ag the projecL area to remove b1 ight and so create neW40vilop ' ,11N �ry'1�,�.� t, '{r I j1�•��}'..7�,t 1 • Jw,w.3rr,Yirletli,.1 tIM' rt ri►+�++ar�. -'.r' - •rl rr-�- �...� 11,Anl•A OF PAOJECT IMPACT 1;0101tlle CITY,County.atetl,etc.) tCrr'7'"•T':� will • F�untin tan"peaCh�;' an Cour tom+ ",d1 fornia r,t I, 7�;Cg1/rNFSItONA6 0191 1 T 11.r.rrllrrnn,enl/1At1•un"•n1 A•rran•q Ll,An:NrNnua lgt to wiN,Er.r•.r�t�r.nf• of Aaedtent Olurlch Iib11O�11d�aIt So Ste1.7r,dd►l Agency) c f�1 V1 34 ,7 {. ~,,'r1Y �tl' �''IIr.�•t7 4 t.�... 11ttNn .ir,t eU1= h [.tA.rp W.d• f l I N-•-r �tME/TITLE OF CONTACT I o v 5C •t •• islet Z, Ii' un;L` -"'1�i ,t�,• Thomas 0. Tineher'' % 'I�,�: f 000 Main St. , Huntington Beach 1714) 111t• •✓ I lYut tht nnptl trq.Me 1,It ttr+p rt H lrnrt..•t.A,I1•0.. 31.d Lt+'ENV&VMENTAC OOCUMBW REVIEW AEQUTACO YES NO v rnrrnunnl Iwr,tnn.^IAtu tin,..-•r••1 ,.0, , (f Yp lJ nv!tpnfnonlal lmmrct OMlpmrnt IAfrnrtl AltsObd 120 capiNl yt�.V...N(1-L ..� ri+rMp,r:•,rNI O„►1,••p.^.,• i , [ 0 1 E111 0 final FIR •� j ►' j '. '!.. 1 (Onll y it nry••Irk I polrtt•t IetntM 8 NlppthNof.1srlII&A �,�1!istariff) , 1 E!- r. .,,•• h, t.•r,+r,tl�•t$s�•nNr,wt NloMattlthuVA!%�t1111{"111114FFot+wlMdf�Co k,( .1`�,) ,1'� pn n•,,nl,cr•n#I Plot.) LW01... 41 4.1t '.yt�t,�,� . V[4 l�l�•Nf1� C t• Day'- Year. •►• ._a` r, 91t?�^+!C� Hftn1DY t No i9d1/N 1413gta d�i .atlq Hasa Ahli► 1j »t Qot�IIAI',:J„ A.1., t vr9 ®'helprt Erin+pl t �tldt nlRtpllpA �IM�y„r;/ IV 5 (�„ tlo I ; ► •..: rI`• ( . , 1 r� 11�Ei/C ANOevC3 . ' ITF At5 37?a Tn t1E COV.LI I 10 A r C..I An,W..,.1w".1 LI AgINGHDuSE tD • QCLEAAlNOHOUIL i] • Ct1oN IIASEU ON 133.to ACTION TAKEN IF VIEW Of +� l-� STATE APOLICATIONI Il(JNatlllttl10r1 a 0*1thCerrlrnlnl t l0l�Wei.� ]1 IDENtr/IFn I9AII It1C Ile b 0*)theistCo-Md+r d 0Unlprer•bt•, I {tell Nu•••M, t 1 =;" CountYl City CountyCII• Cp„nlr/ C•tr Cn„ .,-911 City Ceun. C". r,. r1AF At/I r,n1 Arol Ilnp AteIrlw • t A1•e /,AI A. • 1 P1.q A•.. IMPACT CODEll 1 {.....-..� I?A.STATE PLAN A[OUIIIED ;7 All Gf tY,►tli l7A I `' ^^ "•• ill I S+GNATUAE OF GN ortl�lAl ` AT C:f.An,A,t:,trtytr t•1��,,,� r VN Na 34.FIFINAL CH ACTION OATS rr ,••o ,••• 1—.. ,a ITEMS]9 s7 TO 01 Cnuu•LI TI it ttv APPI•LA•.t fit I nnl 1.1•.,.••y..,,...%• •,.t►111 nh, A,•t NL• i ' 39 CIj1TIF1CAT10M the*W11"Al it" get'hit la tn1 Wool of Otto enpalodge Ind b/tiff the eh.,re dais Its 1,,,•ewtl [►IA fins ofH•.••�a"n•,.• . eansel and hlltt!rl Ihh tofM het bpin quit'Iu1h07111d fsr'IFs►/•IrnlAe nad t Of tr••ADI,IeAI. ,tlttepnll.1 elt•r•nI •' _ .mow A0.• Ala!1►Pint ar TTtN) .r .lrtJ., �1t1•I• TITLE;,; S. ll t11gMATu r at Auth tooted •NRIlltre dfit l i•:fi.r, . at • ,�y; 1. t. Thomas D. T Iche V' r; py.r;, 14) J ATE MAlltlOtO lOtill �� I A /AOKtIC'{• .�/7 nib Got lot.I.- ai.rVAME p► ►!ot �L 1 d A Aq!ci `• ,. t' 1 F• , +. •,70*MICH THIS APPLICATION IUAMII?90 Itl#-S p]Se TO 1E COMPLETED n•• I[of nt.L of r.Cr rvAl UATINII,&%It rot lt•0441 atr•,t, AC t•►+•.u•, tool At•, i '43.011ANT APPLICATION 10 97. Appl.tltlan rtllt*d. !3• L,p Att I,•, lit,., •,, - { ;fAltlpwd by Fedlrel AI JACII I. I;�)•p ' ' � • �. �` t .,r tit tAd dIT ; Y• Mu nIr �h�wenChr^nNle , ! S ..•,•,.iN,�.. ..... .,f.irt..�.+•),...t4w'•..•.♦ .....w.w..,Ip.a, a .4N .M•.e.�.+v+C .YS•k.Y' Y 1 APPENDIX C t I i COMMENTS RECEIVED r^ ' 1 . i� -42- i i I . i i J. lll� GITV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,Nr.IwGir/u uacn �1 To Tan Tinche r From Don ptoble Director of D+asiness 6 Tndustrial Fnt. t'rxlincerirx; planner Subject redevelonient ProiCVL l+re.is Date Iuly 13, lg32 I '!he rublic Works Delzvrtmint has the following ccmrrnts .and concerns regarding the Redevelopment r1roject Areas: A. Ceneral romients I 1. Ito focused 1;.T.it, for tho (Uh-view area 1,; scimn-M.-it general (i.e. a mare descriptive analysis of ttk l.xal)lic u:gjrovL=nts is needed) . B. rA dscaping 1. The design of any landscaping for thn uroject arnos should be bas(d on tl-^., following criteria: ...the c;reatest narcentme of laml capirx; sixxnld be on nrivalc prrl arty; ...all designs and specifications rot' 1.•tn1scapi <j should he revk"d by Public Works; ,^} ...use of the 1972 Street Lighting and I.vxlzca;xs Act should be con- templated relevant to maintaininx; latxt:�aping within the nrojM- A rrea. C. Traffic j i 1. 1-Ten will an analysis of traffic ingmcts, for each project area, !x- ccMleted? D. Water 1. Existing water mains in the Oakview area may be inadequate. (i.e. addi- tional water mains aay have to be installed, loop svetans ompleted, and the main size of existing facilities increased.) 2. Existing water mains in the Talbert-Beach area are ademiate. 3. Foisting water facilities in the Yorktown-Lake area are inadequate: ...oxistiM 4" line in titica will ha,ar to N. rq.)laced with an 8" linai ...water main facilities in Like Street., 1,eta+een Utica and Yorktown, tna_v have to be installed; ...water rains in Yorktown aml Main are of sufficient size. 4. Water train facilities in the min-Pier arm my be ate for fire protection demands. Spa-cific probla s will be identified as planning progreases. DRN:jy cc: Paul took Daryl %nith 0i I l Patapoff Io:s Evans Ralch 1,eyva Karl Huy tit i't�•��tnrski nnlcn rilrtrr Starr f'irtrr {{ Lail:r.w•A-.<.«............ ....... ......._.-.... .. ,., - »�.._............. »+.•+..•.ravml i J 1 r� PEEnvironmental Board t•11 '1 ,31 1111N1 IIIN iit •'•, 11 lu\I,M 1,1\/11,1, F ,1•.1 1►r1111' (1„• ' ��� • 16,1 1I r11.11, 1�• 1. 1� 1 I1' it l411 July 5 , 1982 Memo to: Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise viro From Environmental Board n Regard Proposed Redevelopment Plans and Focussed EIRs for the 0 ) Oakview Project , (2 ) Yorktown-Lake Project , ( 3) Main- Pier, and (4 ) Talbert-Beach. The Huntington Beach Environmental Board has reviewed and discussed the above mentioned Redevelopment Plans and EIRs . We find them to be pretty much cut from the same mold and would have preferred to see important factors for each s1►e0 ! iL Last- hirlhl iilhted ' in some fashion. We rind the following c0111111ent, cuuld be generally applied y in each plan and should be specified in much Treater det,ril (as was the Secticti on Cnergy in each of the reports ) ; � 1 . Public Facjlitjes-- facilities for public transportation ; bus stops , bike paths , neighborhood parks , and etc . , should be spelled out as a part of each plan . Programs for tree planting , street sweeping , police and fire protection are also not detailed. 2• Resources requirements--only energy possibilities are detailed; each plan should call out the need for preserving solar access and obser!.n.; t`le State Sunshine Act ; water conservation devices , arid- tapes of landscapeing , etc. , will f be necessary to conserve less sure future water supplies and reduce the need for new sewer and treatment plant constructions . 3. Recycling facilities- 'localized source-separation faciii - ties (e. g. , in houses , tracts , and commercial buildings ) required in new developments will allow future recycling to i become reality. ' 4 . Development standards--the City should greatly expand on its goals for development (beyond the uniform building code , div . 9) and begin to actively impliment these goals by setting specific standards , especially i ► energy and water conservation, liquid and solid waste hancling , water grjality , and etc. . 5. The financing--we are informed that the structure of redevelopment financing is such that the tax base is tied-up for 20 years and that this may not provide adegljate funds for other city services . f a -44- 1 . S The Environmental Board appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above plans and EIRs. We ask only that greater attention be paid to specific recommendations for wisp , future allocations of scarce resources . ReSeDectively submitted, �m r f Irwin Haydock , Chairman I i i l f t i I i i -45- w.r.r.v 1,T.:�'i-. •�.... •.... .,....••w..r. .+ ..�_._ .. ♦...,.aT. ..... ..... ..— _ .-,...:...�...«.��«.. .«:'+..w.:».R:MN»\Y.t Y.it:4::C'SCZ'?:7;�LS'SF { ico � i�ilc�r»i �Ow. Nletropoli(an Water Oisfr 1 Mr. Tom Tincher Director City of fi tntington Beach Husiness and Industrial Enterprise P. p. Box 190 fJ Huntington Beach, California 92648 } lleair Mr. Tincher: I i Talbert-Beach, Oakview, Yorktown-Lake and Main-Pier Redevel22ment llroj ct Areas Thank you for soliciting, by letter, dated May 20 , 1902, our comma:nts on the Draft ElR' s for the above named projects. " Metropolitan has no facilities or pcuperty near the proposed sites, and would not he affected by the proposed projects. We appreciate your efforts to inform us of your activities that may affect us. If you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 626-4282, extension 455 , or .(213 ) 250y-6000 after June 4 , 1982. Very truly yours,, / t, Glen W. Smith Principal Enqincer Eavironmental Planning Branch DAM/ry i 41 1 . i 1111 .• .•1'....1.., . � 1. • \n;. . [dhl \t,r.iny..a�lt .. I1.. S 1141 1... \••.. . 1• � o CITY Or HUMITIMMM IllXACH . IN t ER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ro TM TIWHER, Director From VM! BI nM, Officer Housing and Cox=lty Development Sp:ial Operations Division - PD j Subject TAMW-BEAGi, QAKVIEW, YO(tKftW- Osts JIM 2, 1982 LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDMI.AR&1I' PRWWr AREAS 71tis Dapartaant has reviewed tw draft envirommntal impact repcirts for the above projects. We have noted that there have been some population increiise projection's for housing units that arc inconsistent with our method of determining projected i population increases for police service. In order to determine the ability to provide the current level of police servict- in areas of increased population due to development, we utilize 0e following; formulas. Ca:omerciel areas - one call for. service for each one thousand feet of rrAxillercills area. Each police officer handles an the average, 225 calls for service each year. Therefore, if the development plan calls for a 300,000 square foot industrial area to be built, it would require 1.3 officers and related equilxrsont to provide: the current level of police service. (300 calls for services divided by 225 monthly per wan ►.+orkload ■ 1.3 officers) Resldercial - we calculate that 2.5 to 3.O'persons oc,&upy each .tidt, (depending; upon UW specific area of development). We also calcul:ate 1 call for service for every 2.23 residents in the developinental area. Therefore, if the do- velopment plan cRIls for 470 new residences rind since each officer hurdles on the average, 225 calls for service each year, it would require 2.34 officers and related equipment to provide current levels of police service to the .1-11 unit reildential area. (470 residential units x '.!, 1wrsons - 1175 population 1175 divided by 2.23 re: idvitts ■ 5IZb culls for service 526 calls for service divided by 225 monthly lwor roan work load + 1.14 officers) Should you need further assistance, feel free to cull uK, at t-xtrnsion 5941. . I VSH:se r -47- INIM&W W-0000 ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT June 8, 1982 Mr. Tom Tincher Director, Business and industrial Enterprise City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 pear Mr. Tinchert SUBJECTt TALBERT-REACH, OAKVIEW, YOVF TOWN-LAKE AND KAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PeOJECT AREAS DEIR'S Thant. you for sending us a copy of the draft enviromental impact reports for the four redevelopment areas reftrenced above. All four project locations are currently well served by OCTD buses. We believe they provide a unique opportunity to integrate transit ` with land use planning. Better transit service to the residents, employers and customers can be achieved by designing and loc'ating building structures so that they are easily accessible by pedestrians, and by incorporating passenger amenities into the designs. The street ' and uriveways can be jo designed that bus operations do not conflict with auto$. Inclusion of transit facilities into redevelopment designs (i.e. bus turnouts, bus shelters, pedestrian waiting pads and sidewalks ; to residences and busineases) will add minimal cost to the project but will increste the likelihood of people using the buses, while at the sear time reduce zrnffic and other negative impacts. A recent example of successful transit/redevela-,ment planning car. be seen in the downtown areas of An&heial and Santa Aye, and we are currently working with the cities of Orange and Tustin in their redevelopment efforts. i We have had a very Rood working relationship with the staff of your Public Work& and Cammunity Services DeparttA nts in coordinating land use and transit- planning. Plenae feel free to contact us in the event that you need consultation on transit related items. We will be glad to provide you more specific information, as the redevelopment plans are ?:eing carried out. 1072 ACACIA PARKWAY Is P 0 110% .MCI%• GAIIIII N Ii11,1V1 CA►II 011NIA 9.164 PHONE NMI i -Q8- . T � 1 Hr. Tom Tincher June 8, 1982 Page Two , On a final note, we have moved to a new location and our mailing address is ae follows: Orange County Transit Diatrict, P.O. Box ` 3005 or 112:2•Acecia Parkway, Carden Grove, CA 92642. Sincerely, < ` Dick Hsu Environmental Coordinator DH:MC 1 i , 1 i s: i I ' I 1 -a9- ^.•�-....•.e•. ..a'•:u,. ...... ..r. .,......,, a .. _........,�. ........ _ .. .. i-. . ...�. .._.._-.... ..�_................., ...�.............._,---«+-,-.�w+s..+•.+.«r.nwedxn..a++m COUNT` SAI�iTATIUN DISTRICTS {i'�- " " '" .3K 714 \� �` aylw (,GJf: 71a 411.21)10 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA `.'°";a `.0ts2.2411 p. O QOX 13127. FOUNTAIN VALLCY. CALIF(IHNIA 977011 IU1l44 CLLIS AvrNUC tLUCLIC CJF*F' HAMN. !;AN til![,U FHLCWAY) June 28, 1902 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Tom Tincher, Director { Business and industrial Enterprise Subject: Draft EIR - Oakview Redevelopment Plan The project area is within Sanitation District No. 3 and has been roaster planned for medium density residential development west of Reach Boulevard and for a combination of commercial and high density residential east of peach Boulevard. The District's flow coefficients for those designations are: Medium Density 3880 gallons per day per acre High nensity 5820 • • " ' Commercial 3230 " • If the project is expected to exceed the master planned flows, it will be necessary to work with our staff on appropriate mitigation measures. There iu adequate capacity in the District's systems to handle master planned flaws from the project. All new connections in the redevelopment area will be subject to the Sanitation District No. 3 connection fee. In addition, industrial and cammercial developments may be subject to an industrial waste discharge permit. If you hava any questions or require further information, please contact the undersigned. 1 / Hilary J. Baker Sr. engineering Aide HJB:hc -50- i � I n•11.•I.11 I.•f .l..l ...l' (•t•fl'I'.i 1. f I 1•.I.•1 n.l 11.I•. Ifr4 1 June 15. 1982 E10.3A I City of Huntington Beach Business and Industrial Enterprise Attention Tom Tincher, Director E 200 Main Street EHuntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Tincher Subject Talbert-Beach, 0akview, Yorktown- Lake and Main-Pier Redevelopment E Project Areas You asked for comments on subject redevelopment project areas. I have reviewed these project areas and find no problems at this time relative to telephone service, both existing and planned. Your cooperation in the following arras require your cooperation however: i 1. Notification, or lead time, for each planned event is essential. 2. Demolition of existing areas in which teleph')nc service exists, must accormidute remaining service. 3. Master Plnn for each area as it exists or is upgraded. Particularly. existing and proposed streetM. 1hank you for this advance notification. If i can to of further assistance, pledue feel free to call . W. R. I ALL Resident Engineer - 3774 E � • -51- A I.lot. •..• .r.11 I '1•Iay.rn• . I t.. h `....r;.a....'r ,. - ..`. .w ._. ... ......... ._ ..,... _. _ _,... ,. .... ....._... ._......� _.._..,..................+..,�aaw+c,raTlJlCl.a'i.(\Lw::d�l1i{'1jCi/iY•" 1 • .: GUVL►In UN 5 AFf4L OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RL-SEARCH :�♦ 1400 ILNiH `a1NLL1 SACHAh1LN1 O 95U 14 Egauro G. B"000. JR. July 6, 1982 (AV[IIhON Mr. Tom Tincher Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: SCN #82052810 - TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAFT EIR i Dear Mr. Tincher: State agencies have commented on your draft environmental impact report (see attached), I If you would like to discuss their concerns and recommendations, please contact the staff from the appropriate agencies. When preparing the final EIR, you must include all comments and responses (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15146). The certified EIR must be considered in the decision- making process for the project. In addition, we urge you to respond directly to the agencies' comments by writing to them, including the State Clearinghouse number on all correspondence. A recent Appellate Court decision in Clear Y.-County of Stanislaus clarified ! requirements for responding to review comments. Specifically, the court indicateti-, that comments must be addressed in detail , giving reasons why the specific comments and suggestions were not accepted. The responses must show factors of overriding importance which justify overriding the suggestion. Responses to comments must not j be conclusory statemelts but must be supported by empirical or experimental data, i scientific authority or explanatory information of any kind. The court further said J that the responses must be a good faith, reasoned analysis . I Section 15002(f) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that a governmental agency take certain actions if on EIR shows substantial adverse environmental impacts could result from a project. These actions include changing the project, imposing condi-tions, on the project, adopting plans or ordinances to avoid the problem, selecting an alternative to the project. or disapproving the project. In the event that the project is approved without adequate mitigation of significant effects, the lead agency must make written finding for each significant effect (Section 15060) and it must support its actions with a written statement of overriding considerations for I; each unmitigated significant effect (Section 1i,099). i If the project requires discretionary approval from any state agency, the Notice of Determination must be filed with the Secretary for Resources, as well as with the County Clerk. Please contact Terry Roberts at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions. Si er I rf r d eputy Director for Projects Coordination I �t c:a�irornia �, �''► duslneu and Transportation Apanc Memorandum Steve Williamson Octet June 11, 1982 Executive Officer HIS State Clearinghouse ti 1400 loth Street ! Sacramento, CA 95814 i ED rmo = DIPARYMLNT Of MNSPORYA?ioN JUa z 1 18ZiL 01WIt"aGf A.wwdiew .1LttR Cl/!>"rI1q QNi• Project Review - 1) Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project 2) Oakview Redevelopment Project , 3) Yorktown-Lake Redevelopment project - City of Huntington beach - Draft Environmental Impact Reports (DEIR) - SCH # Is 82052810t 820 52811, 82052812 The Department of Transportation, Division of .Aeronautics , has reviewed the subject environmental documents , Focusing upon those issues within the scone of our statutory responsibilities. The proposals are to; 1) construct approximately 470 new residential units and create 100,000 square feet of new light industrial development in the Talbert-Beach area of the City of Huntington Beach; 2) rehabilitate existing housing, develop commercial and office space, and construct public improvements !! in the Oakview area of the City of Huntington Beach (specifically, l " 100 residential units will be created either by rehabilitation or new construction) ; 3) construct approximately 150 new residential units or 200 ,000 square feet of office space , in the Yorktown-Lake area of the City of Huntington Beach. John Wayne Airport is located six to seven miles east of the proposed project location, with current traffic patterns resulting in no overflights over the proposed project. However, the Meadowlark Airport appears to b4 in the general vicinity of Huntington Beach, and may have a noise and safety impact upon the proposed projects due to airport operations . We are, there- fore, concerned about those impacts , the impacts the proposed projects may have an the ground transportation network serving the airport, and the land use compatibility between the two users . We feel the above cona erns ought to be addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Reports (FEIR) of the above projects . MARK F. MISPAGEL, Chief Division of Aeronautics Surd Miller , Chief Office of Environmental Services California Tho Rusources Aponcy item orcendoim To t 1. James W. Burno pale Assistant Secretary for Reuourceu �IJM 1 F Ip� File No.i 2. Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Post Office Box 190 Subjects Talbert Beach Redevelop- Huntington Beach, CA 92648 cent Plan. SCH 82052810 Attention: Mr. Tom Tincher From c Department of Water Resources Los Angelea, CA 90055 The Department of Water Reeourceal recommendations related to water conservation and flood damage prevention on the subject document are attached. I� Consideration should also be given to a comprehensive program to use reclaimed water for irrigation purposes in order to free fresh water supplies for bene- ficial uses requiring high quality water. Robert Y. D. Chun, Chief Planning Branch JUL - 2 1982 Southern District (213) 620-4135 AlAringhou•e Attachments i i f i i i I i -54- To reduce water demand, the it)llovill,; Water CU116CMItl011 measures should be implemented: �y Required by law: ! 1. Low-flush toilet:; (see Section 179:1.3 of the Health and Safety Code) . 2. Low-flow showers and faucets (California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 6, Article 1, T20-1406E) . 3. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems (California Energy Co=ission regulations) . Reco=erd be implemented where apalicable: Interior: 1. Supply line pressure: reco=end water pressure greater than 50 pounds f. per square inch (psi) be reduced to 50 psi or less by means of a • pressure reducing valve. �• 2. Flush valve operated venter closets: recomnend 3 gallons per flush. t 3. Drinking fountains: recommend equipped with self-closing valvea. 4. Pipes a insulation: recommend all hot water lines in dwelling be insulated to provide hot water faster with less water waste, and to keep hot �--•' pipes from heating cold water pipes. t. �. Hotel rooms: recommend posting conservation reminders in rooms and rest rooms*. Recommend thermostatically-controlled mixing valve for bath/shover. 1 r, 6. Laundgy facilities: reco=end use of water-conserving models of washers, is 7. Restaurants: recommend use of water-conserving models of dishwashers or retrofitting spray emitters. Recommend serving drinking water upon request only*. Exterior: 1. Landscape with low water-consuming plants wherever feasible. r 2. Hinibtze use of lawn by limiting It to lawn dependent uses, such as playing fields. 3. Use mulch extensively in all landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of @oil will irprove the water-holding capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction. *The Department of Water Resources cr local water district may aid in developing these materials. f -55- j i I 4. Preserve and protect existin►• trees and :clrridis. Fstablished plants are often adapted to low writer ooii,litlon-; .end their uac saves crater needed to establish replale::ent vegetation. i5. Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximiie: the water which kill reach the plant roots. Drip irt'ii;ation, soil moisture sensors and autor.Alc irrigation systems are a few methods of increaxing irrigation efficiency. 6. Use pervious paving; material whenever feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground water recharge. 7. Grading of slopes should minimize surface water runoff. • i B. Investigate the feasibility of utiliz!ng reclaimed waste water, stored rainwater, or household gray water for irrigation. 9. Encourage cluster development which can reduce cite amount of land being converted to urban -use. This will reduce the amount of impervious paving created and thereby aid in ground water recharge. 10. Preserve existing natural drainage areas and encourage the incorporation j of •natural drainage systems in new develupmenta. This would aid in ground water recharge. 11. Flood plains and aquifer recharge areas which are the best sites for ground writer recharge should be preserved as open space. cam,. i 1 . 1 • -2- r i -56- Repo 7tnent of Voter R&!-coorrrvs i ccormendat foh:c for Flood Damage Prevention 1 In flood-prone areas, flood damage prevention measures required to- protect a i proposed development should be based on the following guidelines; 1. All building structures should be protected against a 100•-year flood. 1 It is the State's policy to conscrve water. Any potential loss to ground ( water should be mitigated. • 2. In those areas not covered by a flood Insurance Rate Map or a flood Boundary and Floods:ay ;lap, issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 100-year flood elevation and boundary should be shown on the Environmental Impact Report. 3. At least one route of ingress and egress to the development should be { available during a 100-year flood. 4. The slope and :oundation designs for all structures should be based on detailed soils and engineering studies, especially for hillside developments. 5. Revegetation of the slopes should be done as croon as possible. 4 6. The potential damage to the proposed development by mudflow should be assessed and mitigated as required. 7. Grading should be limited to dry months to minimize i Y problems associated with sediment transport during construction. �I I -57- i . .. .�.. ., . .. .• .. .. ........ -_--.........•.. ...,.... .........,...........,.•.,.mow•!-r1tV•'y:.'.T.�,:..6{;.1�lfiC1[+ 1 t � ' -•h Y�• �I l 1 / 5 �7 5 t 1t �_, t +1 � 1L t `;4, `,r t > ! l �fc .�Iti.. �,; ! ,1i t"•'' r T t.•'Y ..� Y •.i� �YJ. ,' +� �.�( I. �tJ� rf_F'"1 1 h11!.'Jy i ". Olt ^t� /7 ti f, rft�' o t.> rlh� � ^� 1 r ^ :If 1 �HNi73}� tiry ' n" LANurN USE ELEMENT AMENPJ10ENT 8u 2 Environmental paReport 80 huntington beachdepartment ,. 111;.,OLUTION NO. 4936 i► HLE IWIAJTI011 OP THE CITY UOUNCI;, OF THE OTTY OF liilNTING T ON PEACH ADOPTING LAND USE E:Ll::1i':ii T AMEND- MENT NO. EE0-2 TO THE CITY 'S G1;1;ERAL PLAN I I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of,liuntington Ranch desires to update and refine the c:eneral Plan in keeping with changing community► need;, and objectives; end A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendrr.,rt Nu. 80--2 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Cor1r.,: sign on October 21 , 1980, and approved for recommendation to the 1ty ' Council ; and ' Thereafter, the City Council, after giving notice as ,�r - scribed by Government Coda 65355, held at lea:L one public hear- ing to consider n ald band Use Element Amendment. No. 80-2; and AL said hearing before the City Council all persons desJ vl:1(; to be heard on said amendment were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, LIE IT :iCSULV::I: by the "iLy Council of t ht- City of Huntington !leach, pursuant to 1wovisiona of Title 7 , Chapter' 39 Articie 6 ol, the California Go,v�-vnment Code, *commenc- ing with 965350, that Land Use Element, Amendment No. 60-2 to ;:he: General Plan, consisting of t.},c° following changes is hereby adopted: 1 . The 3!) Acre: centered at the Intevsvet. ion of ;harder Avenur and 11c.aoh Dolllevard be dvoianattt(l mulList•-):'v node , and The 10. 1 ; :3�•1't2:� , lkjux.ed :lPpl'0X!.111'lt,:1y 450 1't'ot, north W, :dal lief. Avermo trod went, ro' Magnolia S1-vocL , tit! redesignated f'voln low density renldent. lal Lo cot:ullercial . PASSM) AND �,'.)OPTEJ by Lhe City Council of :he City of }luntinK,Lon Beach at a reGular meeting t1wi-cot' held on the 15Lh 1 4.'/.iq/Z3U �1 clay of December 1980. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVTEWED AMD APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: i I Acting City AdrUnistrator� 4Drector of Development 7Services f Z 0 A R r-, Fv0x� No. 4936 S'CA`I*E OF CALIFORNIA ) COU`M OF ORANGE ) as: tj' CITY OF HUNTINGTON MACH ) I, AI.ICIA H. WENTWORTH, tho duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certi:y that the whole number of membera of the City Council of the City of Huntington beach is seven; that the foregoing reaolutior. Was passed and adopted by the affirtnative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular _., meating thereof held on the 15th day of QeceMhCr , 19jq_, by the following vote: APES: Councibran: Thomas, Finley, Bailee, MacAlliste►•, Mandic, Kelly i i NOES: Councilmen: None_ .. ABSTAIN: F'attinson _ ABSENT: Councilmen: i I me ._. ___-•___ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California fhe faregomg instrument is a Correct copy Of the original on file in thi:office. . . .y Cua{ii,{1 lti U�. Li:� 1.1(i•�ti�:.i ' .il.".t .t.ir C?. Ley l-!Grt.-'�l �r"�i(;�' Deputy • I RESOLUTION NO. 1268 r'r A RESOLUTION OF THE P LAt1't I PSG COM, OF THE CITY OF ilUNTINGTON I3l,ACfl Ri:CCI,►•:iIENrJIiJr ADOPTION OF LAND USE ELEMENT AMEMMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 480-2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California , desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing conununity needs and objectives; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Land Use Element are nec- essary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission recommends the following amendments to the Land Use Elcment: 1. ' That 9 .69 acres located south of Ellis Avenue and approxi- mately 1 , 320 feet cast of GoLdenwest Street be redesignated i from industrial to estate residential (0 to 2 units/acre) ; that 4 .83 acres located approximately 660 feet south of Ellis Avenue and 1, 320 feet e.7st of Goldenwest Street be redesignateO from industrial to estate residential ;0 to 4 units/acre) ; 2. That 80 acres centered at the intersection of Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard be designated as a multi-story node; 3. That 10.13 acres located approximately 150 feet north of Warner Avenue and west of Magnolia Street be redesignated from low density residential to commercial ; 4:I1FIIIEAS, it public Bearing on adoption of Land Use !Element Amendment to thr. General flan Na. 80-2 was held by the • ity Planningi Commission on October 21 , 1980, in accordance with prcvisions of the State Government Code; Now, 'rilEld'FORI., Bi, rT RESOLVED that LBe Planning! Cam- mission of the City of Huntington (leach, California, hereby approves said omendmvilt Lo the General Plan of the City of Huntington Reach. BE IT FURTIMI lt1 SOLVrD, that said amendment to t t,e General Plan of Lhe City of Huntinkiton Beach Ls recommended for .'ciof)Lian by the City Council of the City of lfuntington Beach, California. a lInsolution Page i PASSi.0 Atli) ADOp,1'1:1) by the I'lanniny Cnmmission of on t the City of Huntington Beach, California , owiroll call vote}te 21st day or, fl l: October, 1980, y foll AYES: winchell, Porter, Scilumacher, Bauer 1 NOES: None ABSENT* 1Cencfic•k, Greer ABSTAIN: Bannister i ATTEST: ' r tSarcus I.I. Porter, Ch rman rJames t�. Palin,i Sec' retary 10-21-80 1 TABLE OF' CONTENT'S Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Methodology 1 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 3 2.1 Ellis-Goldenwest Area 3 2.2 Adams-Beach Area 20 ' •L.; Warner- each Area 35 2.4 cnrnrr-Ma5no is rea 43 2.5 Ellis-Gothard Area 54 2.6 Environmental Changes 64 I 3.0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 67 i 3.1 Summary of Proposed Land Use Element. Amendment 80-2 67 -� APPENDICES 69 MT ,311 1 �Fr 1? .. i r' 2.2.4 Planning Commission Recammendatimi The Planning Commission recornmend:r that the 59.55 :acre area located south of Adains Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard retain the existino resource production, commercia!, and lo%v density residential land use designations as shown in Figure 2-5. ` At the October 21, 1980 public hearing, the Planning Commission deleted the Adams-Beach area from Land Use Clement amendment 60-2. The Mola Development Corporation has subsequently filed an appeal to the City Council � for reconsideration. 2.3 Warner Beach Area General Plan Amendment 80--2 .ade.resses a third area of concern loci ted at the southwest corner of the Warner Avenue and Beach Bnulevard intersoction (Figure 2-8). They amendment request for consideration was filed by Mola Development Corporation in April 19410. 2.3.1 Background The applicant's amendment request is for the inclusion of this 10.1.8 acre site within a multi-story suffix: area, retaining the existing C:-4 vase zoning. The site is a. former irhool site and was recently sold as surplus by the Ocean View School District. The site is of an irregular shape with 475 feet fronting on Beach Boulevard, 815 feat on Warner Avenue, 135 feet on Ash Street, 425 feet on Sycamore Avenue, and 260 feet on Elm Street. Adjacent land uses are mixed; irnmedl=dely south of the applicant's site is an existing 14,700 square foot office complex. Surrounding the site Is prima:lly residential dovelopment, with older si-7gle family units and .mewee apartment complexes. The area north of Warner Avenue and west 14 Beach Boulevard Is composed of small individual commercial developments with an 18,960 square i foot shopping complex north of the Intersection. The arEa behind these commercial operations is presently being developed as a 129-unit condominium project. Tha northeast r'ornar of the Intersretioak is occupied by an older supping complex, service statin-a and liquor store;. Behind ffs development are older single family homes along with a Southern California Edison substation. Thta southwrst. corner is occupied by a car wash along Reach i3nulevard, while tic: property hehind is residential with a nxix of older and a few new single family homes and newer apartment cotnp;exec. Tth, purpow of- the multi-story suffix zoning classification i, to allow and regulate multi-5tory developnir'nt in a manner consistent with tha General Pla!, acid pnlicit•s of tho Cit.,. Spacial requirements ire impo-red to Insure that multi-story developments enhance the physical, sncial and environmental characteristics and*conditions of the community. ~M r r I i 111'•1)I11�1 1 01) - f cz: �J j _' x LA gaMas►c DR LOW DEINSITY ,1tI:U(Urit c IIIGII DENSITY � 1)1;1SITY RESII)EN 1'IA1, ,J RES11)E,N`TIAI, f C:0.1r111:ItCI.11, F I FIR rf DR. a'-. � " G1;11.ItAl. 1 I I CU,11N11,11 tAL ,1tia 1I h�1 - I)EASITY 37 L1 � _ _ - •ram•.-_ "�._ _.__ .,.�. .. M ._ u.la''�"'"" , r— - "JRUPOSLI) :1ULTI-S T OP.Y CYPht (Approx}.rtatcly 80 Acres) 7PRES S A i RE'SIDEINTIAL KIERSEILkt 13: 1 1 1)l,f�517')' NSITY VALENCIA MA MU. DR xRSTf+I CR FRIE z GUIL Area of Concern 2.3 0 UF9or- Sep.1.8c 36 hunfi:Igton beach planning division Figure, 2-9 In August 1972 the City Coo-,cil established a citizens High Rise Study Committee to assist in the frrmulatictn of a multi-story ordinance. A multi-story study i eport was completed in May 1973. This report was followed by a multi-story process report in June 1973 which :,uggestee using "specific plans" to implement the .,,jffix. In October 1974, the multi-story suffix OMS) ordinance was drafted. f i Toe Planning Commission ,approved and the City Council adopted the i Multi-Story Policy Plan (General Plan Amendment 77-2 ;Part 2)) in February i and April 1977, respectively. The General Plan presently designates five multi-story nodes throuLhout the City (Figure 2-9). The methodology used to make this determination was based on a series of studies combined to present an overall picture of urban form generations and visual impacu. of multi-story structures. Study maps were developed to show 'scant land, existing multi-story structures, activity generating areas, topography and view opportunities. These maps were y compared and an revaluation of the appropriateness of fourteen various areas was developed, with a recommendation for five nodes emerging. T1►e Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard intersection was not inc;uded in the original multi-story study; therefore, the applicant is requesting this amendment fc. the inclusion of an additional multi-story rode to the reneral Plan. If the suffix is adopter' as part cf the General Plan, the applicant will still be required to request a change of zoning in order to attach the r multi-story suffix to the base zone. Finally, a conditional rive permit «•'ill be required prior to development. 1 2.3.2 Analysis 1. Land Use 1 i The oxisting commercial designation and C-4 zoning allows for a conve,itional development of approximately 90,000 square feet, with a max-mum height of 35 feet. The request for the addition of a multi-story (MS) suffix to the; existing zone will allow the applicant's proposal for the initial construction of a 2,10,000 square foot high rice office building and the potential of two additional structures for a total of approximately 600,f100 square feet employing 1,800 people on the site. I Tile nature of this proposal is such that the only means through which this project roan bra accomplished is with the addition .of a multi-story suffix. However, a multi-story SL!ffix is not grnerally applied on a hro;ect by,project hasis. This designation Is reserved for areas within the community w'iirh are suitable for the development of multi-story nodes. The Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard intersection was nut includes: in the original study as a multi-story node. The reasons for this omission Include the following: I 4, �2 37 { � II .••• AS PLANNING COMM. DATE RED. ' ' E i �;� ;�,� 10, 4.4-77 1189 CITY COUNCIL �� DATE 11ES, ,' `.:J 1 11.7.77 4551 I t qP EXISTING i PRIMARY AREA SECONDARY AREA .i. !� •. t i. h hfi I \ FURTHER STUDY � 1 Sup so PAULTI M STORY LOCATION AAAP huntin ton beach planning division on 30 Fiqure 2-9 I • The minimal amount o; vacant land in the area. The majority of the parcels are small and individually awned; most are already developed. These same characteristics reduce the prospects for redevelopment, due to tha necessity for consolidation. The crily exception in the ,area is the Ocean View School Site. There are no multi-story structures in the area; therefore, no precedent has been set for a multi-story project. The topography of the area does rot provide any unique view opportunities. The area does not contain an activity node or visual landmark. In addition, in the years since the study was developed, a number of residential projects have been completed in the area and a new 129-unit condoroinium project has been started. This residential growth will further reduce the chances for area-wide redevelopment. However, this doe.; not ;trecluee an area-widj designation for a multi-story suffix node; residential and manufacturing :as well as cdmmarcial zones are eligible for a multi-stuck au►fix (114, R5, Nil-A, C2, C3, CM. The benefits for designation of the area ass a multi-ntory node can also be identified. i. The area is located along a major ;act ivit I�•-� c; 1 y corridor (Beach -oulevard), ;approximately mid-way LitA peen tv�o Previously ic'.;ntified multi-story nodes (Huntington Center and F ive P;,ints). i2. Beach Boulevard wns identified in the multi-story study as one of two major functional and visual corridors within which all multi-story development should occur in appropriate locations and clusters; (witl► the exception of the area araaand ' McDonnell-Douglas), pacific roast Highway being Identified as the other corridor. I The steady further stated that these cluster locations are to he determined by their proximity to nodes, intersections and key visual features. � I 3. Thy inteyrsectinn of Warner Avenue and Brach boulevard is a I Pivotal hairt for both cast/wpst and nprthJ,nuth traffic. f3e,ach Eioulevrfrd is thy: primary north/south ro►a:e for through-town and lncal traffic and Warner Avenue is the only complete east/west cross-town route. Thus, this intersection, rspt:cially the southwest corner, is a key area ifa tlae future deveiapmtsnt of the City. 94 •, tl 39 1 i I i The existing five multi-story nodes described in the study range in 7size front 00 to 400 acres, with 10 to 25 percent of Hie area anticipated for actual multi-story development. j The applicant's project would .dominate the nawiy designated multi-story node and could potentially develop beyond the anticipated 10 percent of the node area, becoming the only high-rise project within the node. This may or may not be a problem, depending an the rate of development and , the desires of surrounding property owners. presently, the: applicant's site is the only site within the nods which could uccommodate a • multi-story suffix. In addition, n major development on this site could greatly influence the community as a whole. A major development would definitely alter the visual image of the area. and may encourage a new direction for community growth such as the creation of a new activity corridor west i along Warner Avenue to Huntington Harbour. Finally, a development of this scale ;end type may prove to be in direea competition with the revitalization efforts for the Downtown Area. The' Coastal Element praa;cnts three alternative land use proposals fur the Downtown Area one ? of which may be I)recludvd if major office developments are being provided elsewhere in the community. 2. Economic Considerations The Planning staff, in cooperation with Ultrasystnms, Inc., condurte(I a flscal impact analysis of this project nod is detailed In Appendix A. 3. public Services and Facilities a. Sewers *rhe Firea of concern is serviced by an existing 69 inch County main located along Warner avenue. The Orange County Sanitation District has Indicated that this System will accommodate the applicant's ultimate development proposal. b. Water i There is an existing 21 inch County feeder main along Warner Avenue. Hriwever, there is presently only one e;ght inch main of the fvvd,!r to servirp the .arch of concern and a portion of r3e:ach i1nul(ward. The; whole aren is in ne vd of a gencral upilr.ading and is pree;rutty only adequate for civmestic tire. The project would roquire a loop .around the site with additional olght inch mains off the fouler alcng Warner Avenue in order to adegiately service the development. 40 I C. Drainage Thu site's present surface flow in arcummodated by all existing 48 inch lino along % arnar Avenue. This system will be adequate for the applicant's ultimata development proposal. d. Police and Fire Protection The Police Department operates from one police facility located at MLin Street and Yorktown Avenue. The present - tl.orized level of police manning is approximately 1.15 officers per 1,000 persons; however, since employees will only be in the complex for eight hours a day, half of the normal requirement will be sufficient. Therefore, ire order to 'maintain the current level of service, police 1•�vels would need to be increased by one officer for the applicant's } ultimate development. A proposal of this type will have to be dcweloped under the State standards for high-rise construction. The design must contain special features including a fire, life and safety systems for development approval. Of prime Importance to the adequacy of fire protection coverage is response, tlme, which is basically a function of the distance from the fire station to the incident location and the average speed of travel by fire engine. Fire stations should bn located to provide on average response time of five minutes or less in 90 percent of the incidents. The study area is located entirely within this respnnsa limit and can be adequately serviced. As the Area of concern develops, higher levels of manning will be necessary if the Fire Department is to maintain the level of service required. e. Natural gas service and electrical 'service are ptnvided by the Southarn California Gas Company and the Edison Company, respectively. A four inch steel main gas supply line is located along Beach Boulevard; an overhead 12!<V electrical line runs along Warner Avenue with a break-off into the area of concern. Gas service is generally provided as a nor.nal extension of existing facilities. However, tha availability of natural gas service is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a publir utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurindicLion of the California Public Utilities Commission. Federal rer-juintary agencies can also affect gas supply. Should these atJOCIcies take any action which affects gas supply or the ililwlRs S ••� pcMa;a7ra.. ■�.r.�.-�•—_ . 41 i conditions under which service is nvailn' !e, ojm service will be provided according to the revised conditions. The Sauthorn California Ediscn Company has indicated that {I electrical ;ond reaquiremLants can be met provided thrit electrical demand door, not exceed estirnntcl and there are no une wpected outages to major soeir ces of electrical supply. The total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually. If plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities are delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer �1 loads during peak de►vand periods could become marginal by 1904. f. S,,!id Waste Disposal I The Rainbow Disposal -Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Bearli. No local service constrbints are expected for th:- applicW's ultimate development proposal. I 4. Traffic Circulation Access to the area of concern is off eitivr Beach Boulevard or Warner Avenue; both are designated major arterials. Present traffic volume!, fat• these rs•terials are 45,000 daily trims on Beach Boulevard and 25,000 daily trips on Warncr Avenue. The design capacity for these streets is 45,000 vehicle trips per day. A special traffic :►turJy has been prepared for this proposed development and is contained in Appendix E3. 5. Environmental Issues :�. Noise The arsa of concern is located within the Ldn 65-70 noise contour. 1 These figures are within the optimum noise levels for an office.-professional land use, which is Ldn 75. Ambient levels will i Increase, as a result of traffic generated from multi-story developments. However, noise decibels at total saturation should be within decibel levels projected for the areas as indicated in the Noise. Element of the General Plan. The optimum noise level for all re:si►lenntial tzes is Ldn 60 for outdourj and Ldn 45 for indoors. Mitirlation measures such an buffers and parking setbac:;s may be ne:ressary in ordor to maintain optimum noise levels fa the existing i surrounding rasidential uses. o r 4 9 ' b. Air Ounlity .i Development of a multi-story Office cnmpliyx will affect air quality within the South Coast Region. Tile,,9 ,rrimary air emis.�irrn; generated include rarhon monoxide, 4dro,:arhoes, nitrogen oxides, particulates, and sulfur oxide:; from ;tationury and mobile snurres. Automobile and truck traffic produce mast of the pollutrrats with a small portion attributable to loci% heating. The following table summarizes tt,e air emissions generated by the proposed development: Emission Source Tons of Emissions/l7av MobileOffice Professional ;20f1,000 sq. ft.) Stationary .72 Total .01 .73 Mohiie Office Profe:ssior;al (600,000 sq. ft.) Stationary 2.15 Total •01 2.16 The estirrinted tonnage of pollutants mad' he reduced as viewer r motor vehicles replace older models, new nrlvances in engine design are implementcrl, or Imblic transportatirrn is expanded. 2.3.3 Staff Recommendation The amendment request is to include the araa of concern within a.multi-story suffix. area. The area of concern as part of the corridor along Bearh Boulevard Is in a major activity area. This corridor has bern identified as an area In which multi-story development should occur in approorinte locations. The arert of concern is located mid-way batwren two existinq multi-story nodes and at a key Intersection in the r 1ty for both east-west and north-south traffic. Staff iherafore, recommends that a new multi-story node be designated at the Interjection of 13each Boulevard and Warner Avenue encompassing 17Pproximat(Ily 81) acres. Y.3.1+ f�lartinlr�g ('urnmis:,iu;e lZr;ronm►end;rtier� Ttio Planning (•;onimisnirur rermmneendi that a nf%w multi-stray notic. tn: donignntr.d at thy: intersr,:tiorl of f3each Bnulea;rrji an:� %Varner Avenue; cn('ompaa,inU al)proxirnalvly 60 acres, as rlepirted inFiquro 2-8. 2.4 Warner-Magnolia Area 1 i �.� �• .� Tr.` M/ri1i�AMtwYU.1731�(j�.L•w..r _-_ _ RE QUEST '1 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACn.1 Date ,..--May 14, 1._.,982 .._........�. Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency X4J.AOYT,D BY c1TY`COVNdtL Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City.Administrator .r.:vr Propered by: _90)rom Tincher, Director of Business and Industriol Enterprise Subject: RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL. OF REDEVELOPM NT AND PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR's FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH, OAKVIEW, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVE.LOPMENT PROJECT AREAS Statement of luus, Recommendation,k.slytit, Funding Scurce,Alternexiva Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached for your review and transmittal are copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plans for the four project areas stated above,. and their respective Preliminary Draft EIR's. The action being taken is once again a preliminary step in the over- all Redevelopment Plan process which is required to insure adequate public input and City and Planning Commission involvement, RECUAMEN_DATION: Authorize transmittal of Redevelopment Plans and preliminary Draft EIR's for public comment and review and to fulfill the procedural requirements of California Com- munity Redevelopment Law and C.E.Q.A. ANALYSIS: The transmittal of these documents to the.�Pladfiing Commission, the Chief Administra- tive Officer of the County and other public agencies initiates the formal review and re?orting procedures for generating required input and responses which will be considev.id at the public hearing when the final Redevelopment Plan will be acted upon. Of greatest concern at the present is whether or not we can follow the required procedures and have the plans effective by August 19, 1982. This date is important in that it is at that time that the base tax role is annually established. If we car: have an adopted plan by that date, the tax increment financing of project- costs will be expedited by one year; otherwise, we will have to utilize next year's base role and, thus, lose a year of appreciation in property values and increased taxes. By transmitting these documents at this time we will be in a position to proceed as rapidly as possible in firming up develupmeent proposals and disposition and development agreements for each of the project areas involved. As you are aware. ,' this is of considerable interest and concern in regards to the Talbert-Beach senior citi?ens project and certainly would assist in our. efforts to move forward in the Oakview Neighborhood Enhancement Area. Likewise, the schedule which we have esta- ' blished will allow us to be in a position to respond immediately to development proposals that will evolve after the Coastal Zone Land Use Plan and Specific Plans are adopted. I � 1J �i FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not to proceed at this time. However, such a delay would, in all likelihood, preclude our ability to have a project adopted and in effect prior to the August 19 deadline. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 28 transmitting Talbert-Beach proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 2. Resolution No. 29 transmitting Oakview proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 3. Resolution No. 30 transmitting Yorktown-Lake proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 4. Resolution No. 31 transmitting Main-Pier proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. CWT:TT:jb i �f I � OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I i 1 { 1 1 , PROPOSED 1 REDEVELOPMENT FLAN I FOR THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1 MAY 1982 , i 'i l , ....,«�,.�.: .r ::-r�•-a�°•'�.. .. - .-... ..... .,. ... .��ra� . r_�.r W..t. .1....a.+.fir' 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pa e 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 IntroductIon to the Redevelopment Plan 1 1.2 General Definitions 1 1.3 Project Area Boundaries 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan 2 j 1.5 Duration of Plan 2 1 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan 2 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants 4 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 5 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures 5 2.3.2 Mcving of Structures i 5 i .{ 2.4 Acquisition of Property g 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Nonresidential Occupants 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements 7 and Site Preparation 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency g Property for Uses in Accordance with this Plan 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 9 3.1 Cooperation with City 9 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions 11 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area 11 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements 12 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 15 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed 15 Financing Method 3.5.2 Tax Increments 1s 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notea 17 3.5.4 Loans and Grants 17 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens 17 3.5.6 Financing Limitations 17 List of Exhibits A. Redevelopment Project Area Map 19 B. Redevelopment Project Area Legal Description 20 i • 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, this Redevelopment Plan is for the Oakview Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach. This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety Cade, Section 33000 et seq., the California Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by thr. City Council and as thereafter amended. This Proposed Redevelopment Plan is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on April 20, 1982. 1.2 General Definitions The following definitions will govern In the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise Indicated in the text. "Agency" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington Beach, California or any successor In interest (e.g., C.D.C.). "City„ means the City of Huntington Beach, California. "CitxCouncil" means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Count!►" means the County of Orange, California. "Legal Description" means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared in accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". "�" means the Redevelopment Plan Map for the Oakvlew Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". "Person" means any Individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Onkview Redevelopment Project In the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Pro ect" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Protect Area" means the urea Included within the boundaries of the Oakvlew Redevelcpment Project area as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "B". "Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 at seq.), as amended to date. "State" means the State of California. "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency in the manner provided by Sections 33670 tc 33677, Inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Law and Article XVI, S-iction 16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The legal description of the Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The administration and enforcement of this Plan, Including the preparation and execution of any documents Implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such remedies may Include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, Injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisions which a:•e expressly for the benefit of owners of property In the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council or until all outstanding indebtedness of the Agency shall be retired, whichever is later. ' 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established by luw. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment. Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and in particultir those area' within the City which have become blighted because of deterioration, disuse and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing roL;evolopment efforts, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. _2- a I Accurdingly, We objectives of this Redevelopment rroject are as follows: I -- Eliminating blighting influences, including deteriorating buildings, i Incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public Improvements, obsolete structures, and other physical, economic and social :1eficlencles; Improve the overall appearance of streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings are safe for persons to occupy. -- Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the project area to participate in the redevelopment activities. (� -- Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to li encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the CIty of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. -- Mitigating development limitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social, and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. -- Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. -- Providing construction and employment opportunities In the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed commercial and ofrice facilities. Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains, and other improvements as necessary to nsaist development of the Project Area to conform to the General Plan as a master-planned development an 1 to correct existing environmental deficiencies. -- Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. •- Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area businesses and residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. To obtain the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency Is authorized to undertake most or all of the following implementing actions: -- Acquisition of property. -- Participation by owners and tenants in the redevelopment project. -- RelocutIon assistance to displaced residential and business occupants as required by law. -3- fl M l -- Deve.-,,ment nf adequate parking, lands4..ping, public improvements and facilities. -- Demolition clearance of properties acquired, and cite preparation. -- Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants In the improvement of their properties to carry out the objectives of the redevelopment plan. Assist in providing financing for private and public development In the Project Area. 2.2 Participation by Owners and Tenants 2.2.1 Rules for Participation Opportunities and Re-Entry Preferences Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by such factors as the land uses designated for the Project Area; the provision of public facilities; realignment of streets If required; the ability of owners to finance acquisition and development of structures In accordance with the Plan; and any change in the total number of individual parcels in the Project Area. In order to provide an opportunity to owners and tenants to participate in the growth and development of the Project Area, the Agency shall promulgate rules for owner and tenant participation. if conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sitrss or land uses, the Agency shall establish reasonable priorities and preferences among the owners and tenants. Some of the factors to be considered in establishing these priorities and preferences should include present occupancy? participant's length of residency or occupancy in the area, accommodation of as many participants as pousible, similar land use to similar land use, conformity of participants' proposals with the intent and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, ability to finance the Implementation, development experience and total effectiveness of participants' proposal In providing a service to the community. Owner participant priorities shall take effect at the time that the Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council. In addition to opportunities for participation by Individual persons and i firms, participation to the extent It is feasible shall be available for two or more persons, firms or Institutions, to join together In partnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. The Agency shall upon the request of any conforming owner Issue to such owner within the first twelve months after the adoption of the Flan a certificate of conformity in a form suitable for recordation with the County Recorder's Office. The Agency shall not use eminent -4- Ali I J domain to acquire property owned by conforming owners so long as use conforms to Plan. In the event that the Redevelopment Plan Is amended after a duly noticed public hearing to change the requirements for Lhe property, such otherwise conforming owners may be required to enter into an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event any of the conforming owners desires to construct additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures an any of the real property previously described as i conforming, or acquire additional real property within the Project Area, then such conforming owner may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners. t 2.2.2 Participation Agreements The Agency may require each participant to enter Into a binding agreement with the Agency by which the participant agrees to rehabilitate, develop, or use the property In conformance with the Plan and to be subject to the provisions In the Participation Agreement. In such agreements, participants who retain real property shall be required to join In the recordation of such documents as is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve or to cause to be rehabilitated any building or structure in the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized and directed ' to advise, encourage, and assist In the rehabilitation of property in the Project Area not owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency and the City will conduct such a program to encourage owners of property within the Project Area to upgrade and maintain their property consistent with City codes and standards developed for the Project Area. Properties may be rehabilitated provided: (1) rehabilitation and conservation activities on a structure are carried out In an expeditious manner and in conformance with this Plan and applicable, rehabilitation is completed pursuant to an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event an owner-participant fails or refuses to rehabilitate or develop his real property pursuant to this Plan and an Owner-Participation Agreement, the real property or any interest therein may be acquired by the agency if acquisition funds are available. 2.3.2 Moving ofStructures As is necessary In carrying out this Plan and where It Is economically feasible to do so, the Agency Is authorized in its discretion to move or cause to be moved any standard structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area and dispose of such structures in conformance with the Law and this Plan. -5- i 2.4 Acquisition of Property Except for the area specifically delineated on Exhibit A as being exempted from acquisition by eminent domain, for Development purposes, the Agency may acquire, but Is not required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase, eminent domain, or any other lawful method. It Is in the public Interest and may be necessary in some instances, in order to eliminate the conditions requiring redevelopment and In ardor to execute the Plan, for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property in the Project Area. The Agency shall commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within, the Project Area within twelve (1.2) years after the adoption of the Plan. The Agency Is not authorized by law to acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. The Agency Is authorized, however, to acquire private property which was formerly public property by being transferred by deed, lease, or otherwise to private ownership or control ! before the Agency completes land disposition within the entire Project Area 1 if the Agency and the private owner do not enter into a participation agreement. The Agency shall not acquire real prcperty to be retained by an owner pursuant to a participation agreement If the owner fully performs under the agreement. The Agency is authorized to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which those structures are located. The Agency is also authorized to acquire any other interest In real property less than a fee. The Agency shall not acquire real property an which an existing building is to be continued on its present site and In its present form and use without the consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires substantial structural alteration, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation to assure that such building Is safe for people and/or businesses to occupy, or (2) the site or lot on which the building is situated required modification In size, shape or use, or (3) It is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Plan and the owner fails or refuses to participate In the Plan by executing a participation agreement. The Agency shall define the circumstances to which this section Is applicable. I The Agency may, in its sale and absolute discretion, determine that certain Ireal property within the Project Area and the owners of such property will be permitted to remain as conforming owners without an owner participation 1. agreement with the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use and maintain real property within the requirements of the Plan. Howaver, conforming owners may be required by the Agency to enter into an Owner { Participation Agreement with the Agency in the event that such owners desire to (1) construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures or any of the real property described above as conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. i -6- Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary, in the execution of the Plan, the Agency Is authorized to acquire personal property In the Project Area by any lawful means, Including eminent domain. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Nonresidential Occupants Although little, If any, displacement is likely to occur as a result of redevelopment activities In the Oakview Project Area, the Agency shall assist all families, individuals, businesses, or other entities displaced by the project in finding other locations and facilities. in order to carry out the project with a minimum of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families In finding housing that Is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial moans, in reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by acquisition, construction leasing, rehabilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing inside or outside the Project Area for displaced persons, and to meet housing replacement requirements of state law. The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons (including families, business concerns, and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses and direct losses of personal property (businesses only) for which reimbursement or compensation is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred in the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate existing residential tenants within the City of Huntington Beach. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Site Preparation The Agency is authorized to demolish and clear or move buildings, structures, and other Improvements from any real property In the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. If in implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, l develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, In accordance with all of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. The Agency is authorized to Install and ranstruct or cause to be Installed and constructed temporary public Improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public improvements may Include but are not limited to traffic signals, streets, and utilities. Temporary utilities may be Installed above ground. -7- The Agency is authorized to install and construct or to cause to be installed and constructed with the consent of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach the public Improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the Plan and to pay for part or all of the value therefor, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the Immediate neighborhood In which the project is located, and (2) no other reasonable means of financing such public Improvements are available to the Community. Such public Improvements may include, but a-e not limited to, pedestrian walkways, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, electrical distribution systems, water distribution systems, plazas, parks and playgrounds. It is anticipated that the Agency will construct and provide the streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street lights, underground utilities and i landscaping within the public rights-of-way which .are within the Project Area. 1 I The Agency Is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property In the Project Area owned by the Agency. yWhen the value of such land or the cost of the Installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other Improvement, or both, has bean or will be, ! paid or provided for Initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter Into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which It agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. j2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for Uses In Accordance with this Plan For the purposes of this Plan, the Agr:ncy Is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any Interest In real property. i To the extent permitted by law, the Agency Is authorized to dispose of real property by leases or sales by negotiation without public bidding. All real property acquired by the Agency In the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses ' permitted in the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without Charge. Property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency shall be offered for resale within one year after completion of rehabilitation or an annual report concerning such property shall he published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls In the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. � -8- �'i All purchasers or lessees of property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated In this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency, as well as all property subject to participation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits,or other means. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All property in the Project Area Is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property In the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a participation agreement shall be made expressly subject by eppropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shell contain such nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses as are required by law. li To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency Is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other Improvement either within or outside the Project Area for Itself or for any public body or entity to the extent wh:,re such improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. I During the period of development In the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development in the Project Area Is proceeding in accordance with dispoe:tion and development documents an.' time schedules. For the purposes -f this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer, •is!gn, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property. 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEi. 'TATION 3.1 Cooperation with City I Subject to any limitation in law, the shall aid and cooperate with the Agency In carrying out this Plan and shy any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of c, )oses of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or : ronditiom which caused the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City 11 include but are not necessarily limited to the following: -9- -- instituticn and completion of pr.. lings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grad:. of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other nece, -,3ry modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other puOr rights-of-way In the Project Area. Such action by the City may ii.^hide the abrindonment and relocation of public utilities in the pu.-;!ic rights-of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry uut this Plan. -- Institution and completion of proceedings necessary `,)r chsnges and Improvements In publicly-owned public utilities within affecting the Project Area. -- Revision of zoning, If necessary, within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Flan. -- Imposition wherever necessary (by conditional use permits or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels In the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop rind provide I for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by awners of all real property, both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan. Performance of the above, and of all other funct'.ons and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit %J.e redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried tr. completion without unnecessary delays. -- Referral to the Agency for reviow and recommendation of all building permit, zone change, zone variance, conditional use and other applications pertaining to land use and development In the Project Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to application approval by the City. -- The City is authorized, but not obligated to provide and expend funds to ensure the completion of the project as a whole In accordance with this Plan. The obliaation of the City to perform the actions indicated j in this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described In Section 11 hereof, be contingent upor. the continued availability of funding for j this project primarily from tax Increment revenues as defined In Method for Financing herein. In the event that such funds, at any ! time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this � project, the obligetion of khe City shell thereafter be limited to providing assistance in the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead costs in connection with thn termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced pursuant to this Plan. I I j -lf1- The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project. 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions y Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction. or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid ar.d cooperauun of such public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies In order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, Is not authorized to acquire r;al property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the cooperation of all public bodies. which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. The Agency shall Impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls cortained in the Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will confcrm to the requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or leasas property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privllcgns of owner and tenant participation If such public body Is willing to enter Into a participation agreement with the Agency. During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area Is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending Its disposition for redevelopment. 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area -- Private Uses Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those commercial and residential uses as --hall be Illustrated from time to time In the General Plan of the City. Specific permitted uses within the Project Area are those that-are permitted, or conditionally permitted, by the zoning ordinance contained in the Municipal Code when the zoning ordinance conforms to the General Plan. The number of dwellino units will be In accordance with the provision of the General Plan and zoning ordinance of the City. -- Public Uses, Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way and Easements The public rights-of-way, principal street:, and streets that may requir9 Improvements as proposed for the Project Area are illustrated In Exhibit A. Streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, a: closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper development of the project. Additional public streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency and the City In the Project Area es needed for proper development, circulation and access. -- Semi-Public, Institutional, and Nonprofit Users The Agency Is authorized to permit the establishment or enlargement of ;public, semi-public, Institutional, or nonprofit uses, including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, f:aternal, emplcyee Institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, If allowed by the Agency, shall conform so far as possible to the previsions of this Plan applicable to the uses In the specific area j involved. The Agency shall impose such other reasonable restrictions ( upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of j the Pl-eject Area. 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements All real property In the Project Area Is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. Furthermore, the Agency may, If it deems i appropriate and/or necessary, specify requirements In excess of those described herein or specified by state and local laws. No real property shall i be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of the Plan except with approval of the Agency and In conformance with the provisions of this Plan. -- Construction All construction, whether new or rehabilitation, In the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws In effect from time to time including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. r -- Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses Although the Agency does not anticipate that any existing structures within the Project Area will meet the standards for rehabilitation they, with Agency approval, may be repaired, altered, reconstructed, or rehabilitated, If necessary, In such manner that will meet the following requirements: ; Be safe, sanitary, and sound In all physical respects; -- Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the building code for the City of Huntington Beach. -- Shall conform to the fire code for the City of Huntington Beach. -- Retention of Existing Nonconforming Uses The Agency Is authorized to permit an existing use to remain In an existing building In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use dues not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use Is generally compatible with the developments and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter Into a Participation Agreement and agree to the Imposition of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. -12- i i The Agency Is also authorized to permit an existing use in an existing building not In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provision of this Plan, provided that such buildings are rehabilitated to a decent, safe and sanitary condition, as determined .by the Agency, and provided that such a use Is generally compatible with development and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter Into a Participetion Agreement and agree to the Imposition of such reason-�ble restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the project Area. -- Incompatible Uses i No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor, or similar factors would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shell be permitted In any part of the Project Area. -- Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, Including any parcels retained by a participant, shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. -- Limitation of Building Density The'number of. buildings In the Project Area will be consistent with building Intensities permitted pursuant to existing or revised local zoning ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. -- Limitation on Type. Size and Height of Buildings The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building, and other applicable codes and ordinances and this plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. All new buildings boilit within the Project Area shall complement the overall aesthetic ar.` physlual scale of the existing buildings within and adjacent to the Project Area. -- Open Space, Landscaeing, and Parking An approximate amour.* of open space is to bo provided in the Project Area as required by City codes and ordinances and the Plan. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets, public and private parking Find private streets shall be provided for in each development consistent with or exceeding City cores and ordinances In ` effect from time to time and th' Plan. . �13- In all areas sufficient space, including open spaces, shell be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air, and privacy. -- Signs Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearances by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation, or oche: such similar conditions shall not be permitted In this Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs nec3ssary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as 1 appropriate, for review and approval. I -- NondIscrimination and Nonsenreuatian , There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted In the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. E_mplones and Contract Awards from the Community Contractors and others engaged In construction and rehabilitation activities in the Project Area shall be encouraged to hire and train the = maximum number of employees and trainees from within the community consistent . with the objectives of this Plan. Likewise, where feasible,, the Agency shall make distinct efrorCa to award contracts to business concerns which are located In, or substantially owned by persons residing In, the Project Area If they meet requirements stipulated by the Agency and this Plan. -- Minor Variations !' Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency is authorized to permit t minor variations from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit such minor variations, the Agency must determine that: -- The strict application of the provisions of the Plan would result In practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships Inconsistent with the general purpose and Intent of this Plan. •- There are exceptional circumstances or conditlons applicable to the property or to the Intended development of the property which do not generally apply to other properties having the same standards, restrictions and controls. -- Permitting a minor variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or Injurious to the property or Improvements within or outside the Project Area. -14- -- Permitting a minor variation will not be contrary to the objectives of this Plan. No such minor variation shall be granted which changes a basic land use or which permits substantial departure from the provisions of this Plan. In permitting any such minor variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and to assure compliance with the purposes of this Plan. Nondiscrimination and nonsegregation restrictions shall not be subject to minor variation. No minor variation permitted by the Agency shall be effective until conditional uses, variances, or other zoning changes, if any, have been effectuated by the City to the extent necessary to obtain consistency with such minor variations permitter' by the Agency. 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption. of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, If it deems appropriate, la authorized to finance this project with assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of Americn, any other public agency, donations, special assessment districts, property tax increments, Interest revenue, Income . revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private Institutions, the lease of Agency-owned property, tha sale of Agency-owned property, ; or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not co^`lict with the objectives of the Plan. The City may supply advannes and expend money as necessary to assist the Agency In carrying out this project. Such assistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 3.5.2 Tax Increments 1 Tax Increment financing may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project assessed valuation base will be established In accordance with state law as described herein. ( : Any tax increments will be used to defray project expenses to the '. extent the increment by Itself or from the sale of tax allocation bonds allows. I All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Oakvlew Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows: 115+ i I i -• That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax Is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property In the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by suet, taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the � respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not Include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory Is annexed or otherwise Included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange last equalized an the effective date of said ordinance shall be used In determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property In the project on said effective date); and i -- That portion of said levied taxes each year In excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shell be paid Into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and Interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or Indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, In whole or In part, this redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property-In the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property In the project shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds,,loans, advances and Indebtedness, If any, and interest . thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxAhje property In the project shall be paid into the funds of the rr.:.,, <.-'Iva taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. -- That portion of taxes discussed in this Subsection are hereby Irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and Interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the Incurring of any Indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance In whole or in part the Oakview Redevelopment Project. -- The Agency is authorized to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and indebtedness as appropriate In carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and bonded indebtedness contained In this Subsection. i -16- 1 f I 1 I 1 3.5.3 Irsuance of Bonds and Notes ; The Agency may issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be Issued only after the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, available to repay principal and interest when due and payable. In any case, the Issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their Issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of Its political subdivisions liable for ; them, nor in any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an indebtedness with the meaning of any constitutional or I statutory debt limitation or restriction. I• 3.5.4 Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the United 4, States, or any other public or private source will be utilized If -R available as the Agency deems appropriate to Its corporate purposes. 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may in any year during which it nwns property in a redevelopment project ;,sy directly to any city, county, city and county►, district, Including, but not limited to, a school district, or f other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been , levied upon such property had It not been exempt, an amount of money In lieu of taxes. } t�s The Agency may also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which In the Agency's determination is appropriate to allevirLe any ' financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the project. 3.5.6 r-Inancing Limitations Conaistent with Sections 33333.2 and 33334.2 of the California F. Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are Imposed on this Plan. -- Taxes as defined In Section 33570 of the California Community Redevelopment Law shall not be divided and shall not be allocated to the Agency during any one fiscal (tax) year except by amendment of this Plan, in excess of $350,000. -17- I -- No loans, advances, or Indebtedness to finance, in whole or In part, the Redevelopment Project and to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described In the beforementioned Section 33670 shall be established or Incurred by the Agaitcy beyond 20 years from the date of adapticn of this Plan by the City Council unless such time limitation Is extended by amendment of this Plan. However, such loans, advances, or Indebtedness may be repaid over a period of tinie longer than i such time limit. r -- Without an amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded indebtedness swerved by tax increments which the Agency shall have outstanding at any one time shall not exceed $3,500,000. -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and Improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income, aR defined in Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low income households as defined In Section 41067, unle3a one of the following findings are made.- - That no need exists In the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or Increase the # supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate {} income or very low income households; or -- That some stated percentage lass than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuent to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing need; or -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate Income housing needs In the community Is being made, and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for j the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, Is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section, The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect re3ult of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. f -1$- ( 7 tll � 1 — • �'.j•crf3 i 17: 410 o :PUB I�1F0 rN IA 1 1 • . - a P >F = -� BY - EL ENT • p p • G "" 1 M7 YW cb) r. + y C7 O + 0 © !! O j• .®: a + •..M tent •O la•MM1l •�N 1 1 • O h U5'I -R A I IT "% 771 wel Final=I111112u sagowos smimsmii 1 � OAKVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA -19- -_..rw........,. ..n l�r.. .. ...... .. �.... .. .. .. ... ._ � ..., .. �....._..... .. .. w••,. s.sr Yfr+.R�riMY►.r M•.vrGrry'.1sMCo•w �J Y. EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT Beginning at the intersection of the north line of Warner Avenue and the northerly exten- sion of the west line of Oak Lane, 60 feet in width, as shown on a map of Tract Number 368, recorded in Book 15, Page 31 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence southerly along said northerly extension, the westerly line of said Oak f Lane and its southerly extension to the north line of Tract Number 4091 recorded in Book 174, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence westerly along said north line to 'the west line of said Tract V91; thence southerly along said west line and its southerly extension to the south line of Slater Avenue; thencs easterly along said south line to the southerly extension of the easterly lin^. of Keelson Lane as shown an a map of Tract Number 5057 recorded in Book 182, Page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly along said southerly extension and the easterly line of said Keelson Lane to the easterly ex- tension of the northerly, line of a 20.00 foot alley, adjacent to and southerly to Lot 3 of said Tract 5057; thence westerly along said easterly extension and the north line of said alley to the southerly extension of the easterly line of the 20.00 foot alley adja- cent to and westerly from Lots 3 through 11 of said Tract Nkober S057; thence northerly along said southerly extension and easterly line of said alley to the north line of said Tract Number S057; thence westerly along said north line to the easterly line of Queens Lane as shown on a map of Tract Number 4301, recorded. in Book 177, Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly, north-westerly, north- erly and north-westerly along the east line of said Queens Lane to the east line of said Tract Number 4301; thence northerly along* said east line to the south line of Mandrell Drive as shown on said Tract Number 4301'; thence easterly, north-easterly, northerly, north-westerly and northerly along the line of Mandrell Drive which changes to Ash Lane as it turns north to the south line of Block E of Tract Number.436 recorded in Book 169 Page 28 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence easterly along south line of Block E and Block F of said Tract Number 436 to the west line or the east 237.42 feet of Lot 5 of said Block F; thence north along said west line to the north line of said I.ot 5; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 217.42 feet of Lot 4 of said Block F; thence northerly along said :,rest line and its northerly extension to the south line of Lot 1 of said Block F; thence easterly along said south line and its easterly extension to the centerline of Beach Boulevard; thence northerly along said centerline to the north line of Earner Avenue, thence westerly along said north line to the point of beginning. i l i if ' i ! -20- ik I I I ' PR INARY DRA FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT May, 1982 ti•hf f r' 4. i r 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS i Section 1.0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT g 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION 7 MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 16 6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 16 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 17 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS 17 9.0 INS',GNIFICANT EFFECTS 17 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 18 APPENDIX A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19 ' APPENDIX B, INITIAL STUDY 20 X i ' i 0 1.0 SUMMARY The proposed project consists of adoption of a proposed Redevelopment plan for the 30-acre Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the plasi Is to remove existing blight and Improve the physical and economic well-being of the City of Huntington©each. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the rehabilitation and Infilling of housing the development of commercial and office space and construction of much needed public Improvements. The Plan also provides for assemblage and sale of selected properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, If owners In thecae parcels are desirous of participating in the project, such participation will be encouraged in conformance with the Redevelopment- Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This Impact will be , largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price, of the selected properties to be acquired at fair market value, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and (3) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and its activities. The Impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborhoods Is also expected to bu positive over the long term. Construction of modern well planned commercial development and the rehabilitation and construction of residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic Impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting Influences will be irradleated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it Is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative Impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these Impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modern and well-designed commercial and office facilities, new housing, public Improvements and the rehabilitation of uxisting residential units which will eliminate the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. As presently envisioned, it is the desire of the Agency to rehabilitate and construct approximately 100 residential units and to create approximately j 300,000 square feet of new office and commercial development over the same time period. The total value of Improvements Is expected to exceed $35,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity, the Agency anticipates very fey, If any, relocation of existing residences. The precise layout of new development, phasing and level of activity is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted If required by C.E.O.A. The generalized Impacts of an additional 100 residential units and a net 300,000 square feet of n,,w commercini/office development ;s discussed In further detail In this report. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Repot L (EIR) has been prepared pursuant to the State EIR Guidelines for the Oakview Redevelopment Plan. This EIR Is Intended to provide decision makers with useful Informution on the Impact of the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to adoption of the plan by. the Huntington Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken In Implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plan will be subject to further environmental evaluation In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 2.2 Project Location The proposed project to located In the City of Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile southeast of downtown Los Angeles (refer to Figure 1). The proposed Oakview Redevelopment Project as selected by thu Huntington Beech City Planning Commission consists of approximately 30 acres as shown In Figure 2 and as legally described In Appendix A. 2.3 Project Objectives As outlined In the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the objectives are to: - Eliminate blighting lnfluences, Including deterlorsting buildings, Incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public Improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve. the overall appearance of existing buildings, streets, parking areas and other facilitles, public and private; and assure that all buildings, new and old, are safe for pemons and businesses to occupy. - Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Area to participate In the redevelopment activities. - Provldinq adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourag- nsw construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. - Wfitigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that trey constitute a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. ��"___ -w.r ^• a .r` ..... _. -._ ....-..........._ ....,................._.....-»..�....... .....124 i. ..a... ....�...... .-. ......... .. .._.. .. - ..1. ��• ..«. S a`V •.••+• ••i• •`• It � al••ftN ? ?.w O •a ]O rt. ' Y•••rVf f YT•Wt; f Yl Y•r u. ..�-�a����� Lt•rs:• +-9� tan F►tntipsa + .•. a ! ,+•_r.: _ . i' � sr• tfr t1 • (] f i f i K_•�• •��� �,�-t•.•j :s IO � ro•1•• �' ,•tos.rs t•4a,R •-• J t ``—'1y +- u•• El io t t t• U1 SL�1 L j t0 K1 •� Mw:s.! r..� `•: �� _. pt►•rt•ct � 71 �+ v • ; ••••t LDS 11kGELES • COti Lb �1. �•�_ ..c.t.e•• �' • ps•«••• ORA►iGE _G e w•• • .` LAW �O f 'J i F►•tt•t ta••.••+•••.w•tt•1?► • • tt1••••J .•w•w•t•b s ♦ , 0 _ 91 M• j LL'a p .•.rt•t.acli �•"t t� 1i •.pi` v 'T • .r `[:o-Q rr•.Q a..t•f.c aaw, Optfy� �. ••l arrtO •r.t� f 4i� t.•rr.- aLNso�lc cu i �•_.........�. + cJJunft pig IOlt 22 Q •.V�, _ .� _` • ���- } �`•• C tRyll" M k VICINITY MAP *Mr i t•.uls r of \ a p HUNTINGTON BEACH � �,•r.• �s nrt. FIGURE 1 �► . D w LPG E w � u � , /RIwMf f 1 i ,itr • J r . #'irffr* S y • (a.:Cwt)2A49•l�I •`�'.: . � t 11 �MMl1 K••� •/ •fyel• (D 01CD m0 ?ID�l� .m O •�. • b ... 0- i a .4 •• � • � , An • ALM O ••yc .'" � O O '' O � o calf 1 0 • � /1Y�./11 f•.f 1 � 0 ,Q Q• p Q 11r•�!r !!•f 1 , f 1 . 03 re 14 777 'j •'•' N )USIN A I It •' Q U t s• t . . opt 46 !y v r •i �,�. qi tt •e 1st,, r. 11 i,/r • Lh•1 .�•4 •.,1 • � w • MnI, .•••.• i OAKVIEw NEIGHBORHOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 1 FIGURE 2 i I Providing adequate public Improvements, public facilities, upon spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. .. Providing construction and employment opportuntles In the rehabilitation and development of these facilities and by providing employment i opportunities in the operation of the proposed commercial/office facilities. Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, eur'us, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and J environmental quality. i • Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the � State of California. f, 2.4 Prolact Imelementation 'ro implement the proposed project, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Is proposing the following activities �4thin the Oakview Project Area% Possible Acquisition and sale of property. ' - Rehabilitation of structures. - Participation by owners and tenants through the improvement of their properties or through other opportunities to participate in this or other redevelopment projects. - Relocation assistance to displaced residential and nonresidentInI ;: '• occupents as required by law. Development of better parking, landscaping and public improvement concepts and facilities. �i - Demotltlon, clearance of properties acquired, provide public Improvements, building and site preparation. - Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants In the Improvements of their properties to carry out the objectives of the Redevelopment Phan. Possible closure of streets and widening of alleys to provide Improved l security and additional open space. i I The land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities and building Intensities and standards which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: 2.4.1 Lan d Uees - Residential. Primarily medium to high density residential uses Including condominium development. - Commercial. Principal uses would Include general retail commercial and offic�cilitles. 2.4.2 Principal Streets i Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street system. Local street and alley Improvements will be installed where necessary. 2.4.3 Uopulation Densities Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 7-15 dwelling units per gross acre for Medium Density Residential development and 25-35 dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. i 2.4.4 Building Intensities All commercial, office and residential uses throughout the Project Areu shall conform to or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the final Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. I 2.4.5 Standards Minimum standards for the Project Area include current specifications for public works construction, building codes, zoning and subdivision regulations and all other applicable local, county and state regulations. 2.5 Project Duration Except for the nondiscriminrtion and nonsegregatlon provisions which shall run In petpetulty, the provisions of this plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this plan may be made affective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent Domain proceedings shall be limited to 12 years from adoption of the plan. 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing environment for the City of Huntington Beach is well documented In the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Community Profile, the Huntington Beach Miscellaneous Historical Data and several previous environmental Impact reports all of which are on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. -6- ... .... _. .... ..._.... ........-....�.,r+.r..+.rrw+...r. L:!'ih-.::.IS S3•W Gl.a+ 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND UNAVOID ACE EFFECTS This section of tho Focused Environmental Impact Report will examine the general Impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific Impacts of the type of development/redevelopment that is presently envisioned by the Agency. As previously Indicated, individual projects that are Implemented over the next several years will be subject to further environmental evaluation in accordance with C.E.G.A. 4.1 General Impacts of Redevelopment As stated in the Preliminary Plan for the'Oakview Redevelopment Project, the general Impact upon the residents of the Project Area and on the surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1) blighted areas will be replaced with new or rehabilitated structures, (2) relocation of residents when necessary will be in compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) there will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. However, as described above, this loss would not constitute a Significant Impact as the development will be consistent with present zoning and the anticipated uses will be beneficial to the community. In addition to these Items discussed in the Prelirr!%iary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneficially impact the Project Area by: - Providing additional affordable decent, safe and sanitary housing to the existing stack within the City of Huntington Basch. - Providing adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage new construction and reinvestment by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with a stronger economic base. - Mitigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it causes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development and rehabilitation of housing and commercial/office facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of new commercial/office facilities. - Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development. - Establishing development criteria and cnntrols for the permitted reuses within the Project Area in accordance with modern competitive development practices. -7- l The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned while providing for the assemblage and sale of sale^ted properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency anticipates few, if any, acquisitions. However, If owners In these parcels are desirous of participating in the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value*, (2) Initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisor assistance and benefits P P Y to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and Its activities. Although the Impact of relocation could be negative, Its long-term Impact Is o),pected to be positive In that relocation will afford residences In the Project Are:, a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or ! no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The Impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development of modern, well-planned Industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, in achieving such development, existing blighting influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. i Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it is possible that In the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative Impacts during 4 tho construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control thu Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modern and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area whllr enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beath. * Under Eminent Domain Law (1263.320), fair market value of the property taken Is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obliged to sell and a i buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the purposes for which the property Is reasonably adaptable and availabie. When the Agency purchases property, it usually will pay cash. This Is of additional benefit to potential displacees whan compared to today's "creative financing" type of transaction, where the sailer usually ends up receiving monthly payme►,ce on a part of their equity. Sellers usually have ono additional year to purchase comparable property before they are required to pay capital gains tax, because most redevelopn;gnt transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. -8- ' i The proposed redevelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the Implementation of the General Plan and its goals and objectives which have guided the development of the City since its adopti^n. i 4.2 S2ecific Impacts of Presently Envisioned Redevelopment Activities As presently envi•3ioned, It Is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the construction or rehabilitation of, approximately 100 residential units and to assist In the creation of approximately 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development. The total value of Improvements would be approximately $35,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of very few, If any, residences. The precise location of new development, phasing and level of activity is ! Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, individual environmental evaluations will be conducted as required by C.E.O.A. The generalized Impacts of 100 new and rehabilitated residential units and a net 300,000 square feet of new commercial/office development can be summarized as follows: *Residential - 100 Units - 11000 vehicle trips per day increase - 150 parking spaces Increase - 25,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase - 30,000 gallons of water per day Increase - 500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase - 110 potential maximum student Increase - 220 population Increase j *Commercial/Office - 300,000 Square Feet - 4,000 vehicle trips per day Increase - 1,200 parking spaces increase 50,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase - 60,000 gallons of water per day increase - 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase A population Increase of 220 wil: probably not require the addition of firemen and related equipment, policemen and related equipment, and will not require additional educational facilities or the addition of sewer and water facilities. The costs for providing any required services could be provided by the Redevelopment Agency. it is anticipated that some changas will be required In the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and In the solid waste management system. The proposed project would generate about 1,400 pounds of emission per day. Meru detailed information will be required prior to Implementation of individual development projects. * Estimates have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associates using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. -9- I Although it is Impossible to project specific activities, it Is presently envisioned that Agency assistance will be required to implement up to 100 housing units and up to 300,000 square feet of commercial/office development. 4.3 Mitigation Measures The proposed Redevelopment Plan Is a means to mitigate the Impact of blight in the Project Araa and Imprnve the social, environmental and economic conditions In the City. While the project is beneficial, minor adverse Impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered at this stage of the redevelopment process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed In accordance with provisions of the Uniform Building Code which governs construction relative to saismlc movement. Onsite grading and earth removal will be performed to the i satisfaction of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosion of sons, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the proper engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No unusual mitigating measures beyon d the regular controls is of the City are proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Atc As mitigating measures, the Agency will encourage Improved circulation, the extension and Improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usage, energy conservation, bike routes, paths and open space and green areas. ; f 4.3.3 Water Development as proposed by the Redevelopment Plan will create an additional demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher intensity development may require expanding capacity and Improving local street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a more specific Indication of actual site development plena occur. No apeeific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.4 Plant Life The project will remove no significant vegetation since none Is In existence. Landscaping will negate the Impact of providing an urban land use on currently ' vacant and redeveloped property. Landscaping Is anticipated to be In excess of City standards. 4.3.5 Animal Life The Project Area is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. Landscaping of the Project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhance a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. i f -10- I 4.3.6 Noise Noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to Increase significantly. Normal construction of building Is anticipated to provide a minimum outside-to-Inside attenuation of 22dBA which will reduce the inside noise to a level approaching 45dBA. No additional mitigation measures beyond the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City's Noise Ordinance will be required. Noise from traffic within the Project Area will be reduced because of Agency/City Improvements to road surfacing and traffic control equipment. In addition, Implementation of Section 27160 (a) of the California Vehicle Code for auto and truck manufacturers will result in a decrease In noise levels from engines and tires; by 1987 all vehicles must be at levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 Light and Glare i j Landscaping will "soften" the visual impact of the possible light and glare resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area. Landscaping plans for f anch'redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers for approval by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. The City will also exercise sign control and architectural control over the new development In the project Area. 4.3.6 Land Use As previously stated, the lend uses of the Project Area are proposed to be redeveloped to mitigate blighted conditions. Existing and future residential development will bo buffered from adjacont developments to mitigate any potential conflict from adjacent uses. 4.3.9 Natural Resnurces Wherever feasible, existing structures and improvements that are scheduled for demolition will be recycled to conserve on the consumption of natural resource. 4.3.10 Risk of Upset No significant hazard of explosion or hazardous substances Is anticipated. No i mitigation measures are proposed at this time. f 4.3.11 Population j It Is doubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantially great enough to create a significant adverse Impact to the City. i It Is not anticipated that relocation assistance will be required, however, if It Is, relocation activities will be conducted in accordance with State law. I i -11- n • Relocation Assistance. Tho Agency shall assist all parsons (including families end others) displaced from the project by the Agency In finding other Iocations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences be necessary to carry out the project, persons displaced from their homes shall be assisted by the Agency in finding housing that Is decent, safe and sanitary; within their financial means; In reasonably convenient locations; and as otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency Is authorized to provide housing Inside or outside the Project Area for those persons displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. Relocation Payments. The Agency shall make reloc,,.'ion payments to persons including 7amiller. and others) displaced by the project, for j moving expenses for which reimbursement or compensation Is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs Incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The i Agency shall make every effort. to relocate Individuals and families. Temporary Relocation Housing. The Agency Is 'authorized to provide temporary relocation housing on cleared sites within the Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, standard and decent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prier to permanent disposition and development of such a cleared sites. If f aslble and desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites E outside the Projeci. Area for providing relocation housing resources. The a Agency Is also authorized to provide temporary relocation housing in houses acquired by the Agency that are baing held for sale and/or rehabilitation. 4.3.12 Housing,. Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of Increaning and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined In the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined In Section 41067, unless one ! of the following findings are made: ; - That no need exists In the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or Increase the supply of housing for persnns and families of low or moderate income households; or i - That some stated percentage, less than 20 percent, nf the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing needs; nr 1 -12- J That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate Income housing reeds In the community is being made, and that this effort Including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent in Impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate Income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation Redevelopment will assist In correcting Interior circulation resulting In Improved traffic flow and provide Improved access and additional parking for both residential and commercial/office developments. 4.3.14 Public Services No mitigation meesurea are proposed at this time. However, additional manning of such services as fire protection, .building Inspections and police protection, etc. will be necessary to maintain the sumo level of servico that now exists. 4.3.15 Energy The following energy conservation measures are recommended for the new and renovated structures: - Use of as much solar and alternate energy a-s Is feasible. - Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. - Electric lights should be strategically placed to • maximize their tj efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. Electrical hosting In public and private structures should be discouraged. Solar assisted heating systems should be encouraged. . }z. Reflecting ami/or insulating glass should be used in structures where windows are not shaded by exterior architectural projections or mature plants. : 4.3.16 Utilities No mitigatlon measures tire proposed at this time. t: t i -13- ....<r-... .. . ....; ^ a.,n.. ..,. .. .... .. .. .... __ .. _. ....._._..._' .. -._......,...._._....._.�.�..-�... .......,.wa�•.r atf G'f'i:rC:2.:.:i1e)� i 4.3.17 Human Health No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, It should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be improved by being relocated Into housing that Is decent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.18 Asethetics Architecture and landscaping site plans will be approved by the City. - Incompat!ble Uses. No use or structure which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor or similar factor would be inenmpatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted In any part of the Project Area. i - Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels. Parcels In the Project Area, E including any parcels retained by a participant, will not be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. - Limitation of Building Density. The number of buildings in the Project f Area will be consistent with building intensities permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. - Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings. The helghtj type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building and other applicable codes and ordinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. Open Space, Landscaping and Parking. the approximate amount of open space to be'provided -In the Project Area Is the total of all areas which will be In the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the open cpace around buildings, and all other amounts of outdoor areas not permitted through'limits on land coverage by the Plan to be covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where new construction or rehabilitation occurs shall be submitted to the Agency for review and approval to etm-re appropriateness and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets and public and private parking shall be provided for in each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time. Any private streets or off-street parking must also comply with regulations Imposed by the Redevelopment Plan. Light, Air and Privacy. In all areas, sufficient space shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air and privacy. i - Slme. Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearance by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted In the Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and prrducts associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be su!:niltted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review end as".ps u ii a s. 4.3.19 Recreation The provision of additional open space as presently envisioned should Improve recreational opportunities. 4.3.20 Archeological/Historical Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified { individual will be retained to Investignta the significance of the items, catalog and remove same for further study and preservation. No other mitigation. measures ara proposed. i 4.3.21 Development Standards - Now Construction. All construction In the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws In effect from time to time Includhig, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, heating, gredinn, plumbing, sign and zoning codas of the City r.f Huntington Beach. Rehabllitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses. Any existing - structures wl"-In the Project Area which meet thn standards for rehabilitation m,y be rrpaired, altered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, if necessary, In such manner that will meet the foliowing requirements% o Be safe, sanitary and sound in all physl2al respects. o Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the wahabilitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington Beach, j o Shall eonfcrm to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. Shall be comparable In appearance to the architecture of the on-site i proposed new structures. 4.4 Unavoidable Effects The .proposed project should Improve the community's overall economic situation and, as a result, bring abuut more job opportunities, •hicrease population and provide a higher gpjality of life for the residents of Huntington Beach. Those factors, in turn, will place a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, pc:wer and land resources, as well as contribute to sir and noise pollution. i I -15- i The implementation of the Plan will result In the rehabllitation and construction of housing structures and construction of commercial/office buildings; the pavement of streets, alleys and parking lots; and the davelopment of other facilities that will probably result in increased rainfall runoff. During the course of implementing the project, there will be sormi temporary disruption to normal activities due to construction. Construction, us well as the provision of public improvem3nts, will result In the utilization of certain n8ttT81 resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum and lumber. Implementation of the proposers Redevelopment Plan will rosult in the acqulaltion of certain property and the relocation nf owners and tenants. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Pro ect The "no project" alternative would allow the Project Area to continue In a blighted condition for an lndeflnitc period. The application of existing federal, stets and local funds is not odequete to significantly prevent existing deterioration or to significantly improve existing conditions. 5.2 Smaller Project Area Designation of a smaller project area will not achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan or slim;nate the blighted conditions. 5.3 LaMer Project Arco Establishment of a larger project area would require more extensive Investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not necessarily enhance the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plan's objectives. 6.o 'LOCAL SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS E The Redevelopment Plan provides policy direction in the establishment of land uae categorlee In aacordence with the General Plan. The Plan further provides for the acquisition of property, rehabilitation and construction of structures; relocation of Borne families; Installation or reconstruction of streets and alleys, utilities and other site Improvements; and flnan:ial methods for lmpl�:menting the project. The Redevelopment Plan Is deuigned to provide direction for the ,. tranAtloa from present short-term policies to the long-range goals and objectives of Huntington Beach. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective i for 35 years. i i Not to implement the Plan at this time would be to Intensify the conditions of blight and deterioration that exist within the Project Area. If implemented, the i Plan would arrest these conditions ever the long-term, and would help promote the ec.)nomic and physical well-being of the City of HuntIngtL-n Beach. # -16- E , Concerning underdeveloped or vacant lend, the long-term effects will be a loss of open space and some resources. The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the pinning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, relocation of households and construction and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the Intensity of residential development will Increase and will result In , additional congeatlon. Noise and air emissions in thy: Project Area would likewise Increase. 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS Although the project will result in the utilization of certain resources such as and im lamentation of Its sand, petroleum and lumber in the construction a p various proposals, and will result in the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, it Is unlikely that the Impacts of the implementation of the project would result In any morn adverse environmental changes than would the continued growth of the City under normal conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the Improvements called for In the Redevelopment Plan, there should bra less land and resources committed 1 Irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land already , committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the stepa outlined in this report. 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS F� The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as a series of events in casual sequence beginning with job creations The creation of new jobs then leads to job shafts and vacancies, followed by immigration and a demand for shelt.3r. This, in turn, is followed by an ordering of land uses and a shifting of ! tho spatial configuration of the labor supply. The shifting of the location of the supply of labor is a stimulus for the new location of business and other j economic actl%-"y creating jobs and starting the growth cycle over again, The regional growth cycle constitutes the source of the demand for the construction !! of private and public facilities. The actual phyoical pattern of the growth in i the City iP the result of the chronological order and size In which specific par-leis of land are developed. The relatively small size parcels have limited consolidation the growth and development poasibillties in the Project Area. The t eo for of parcels in the Redevelopment Proje ct Area will broaden the possibilities more intense development and growth. The implementation of the project will have a growth Inducing impact to the City by Increasing the population by about 220 persons. The proposed project will expand the housing stock of the City by about 100 units and will Increase employment opportunities. 9.0 INSIGI,,IiFICANT EFFECTS { i The environmental impacts identified In the Initial Study as Insignificant i (Appendix B) included primarily those rolated to land, water, plant and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. These impacts were disn,:sled primarily because they are not affected by the proposed project. -17- i i 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS,-PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project, April, 1982. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Proposed Redeveloment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air ( ualitZ,Handbr,ok for Environmemal Impact Reports, SCAG. 10.5 Geotechnical In2uts, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, ?974. 10.6 Sclent itic Resources Survey Inventory, Huntington Beach, California, 4 'Xi-chaeological Research, Inc., April 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendment, EIR 81-6, Huntington Beach Department of Development Sarvices. 10.0 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. 1 � i I I I �I Appendix "A" 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OAKVIEW AREA PROJECT Beginning at the intersection of the north line of Warner Avenue and the northerly exten- sion of the west line of Oak Lane, 60 feet in width, as shown on a rop of Tract Number 368, recorded in Book 15, Page 31 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence southerly along said northerly extension, the westerly line of said Oak Lane and its southerly extension to the north line of Tract Number 4091 recorded in Book 174, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence westerly along said north line to the west line of said Tract 4091; thence southerly along said west line and its southerly extension to the south line of Slater Avenue; thence easterly along said south line to the southerly extension of the easterly line of Keelson Lane as shown on a map of Tract ftiber 5057 recorded in Book 182, Page 6 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly along said southerly extension and the easterly line of said Keelson Lane to the easterly ex- tension of the northerly line of a 20.00 foot alley, adjacent to and southerly to Got 3 of said Tract 5057; thence westerly along said easterly extension and the north line of said alley to the southerly extension of the easterly line of the 20.0D foot alley adja- cent to and westerly from Lots 3 through 11 of said Tract Number S057; thence northerly along said southerly extension and easterly line of said alley to the north line of said Tract Number 5057; thence.westerly along said north line to the easterly line of Queens Lane as shown on a map of Tract Number 4301, recorded in Book 177, Page 11 of Miscellaneou. r., Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence northerly north-westerly, north- erly and north-westerly along the east line of said Queens Lane to the east line of said Tract Number 4301; thence northerly along said east line to the south line of Mandrell Drive as shown on said Tract Number 4301; thence easterly, north-easterly, northerly, north-westerly and northerly along the line of Mandrell Drive which changes to Ash Lane as it turns north to the south line of Block E of Tract Number 436 recorded in Book 16, Page 28 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange Ccunty Recorder; thence easterly along south line of Block E and Block F of said Tract Number 436 to the Nest line of tho cast 237.42 feet of imt 5 of said Block F; thence north along said west line to the north line of said Lot 5; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 217.42 feet of Lot 4 of said Block F; thence northerly along said west line and its f northerly extension to the south line of int 1 of said Block F; thence easterly along said south line and its easterly extension to the centerline of Beach Boulevard; ' thence northerly along said centerline to the north line of Warner Avenue, thence westerly along said north line to the point of beginning. ' i 3 A00A (Tait CONTINUATION SHUT A HUNG ADMINSTI►ATIVa RIGULATIC..4 Appendix "B" WITH THU UCRQTIUIY OF STATE (Pvnvnnt to Goverment Crdn S,cNM 1171i.1) _z5- 55. Appendix J is added to read: APPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATION T0: City-of HuntinglonReach FROM: Huntin ton Beach Redevelopment (Responsible Agency (Lead—Agency) �•�ncy 2000 Main Street 2000 Main Street (Address)-- (Mdre s is Huntington Beach, California 92648 Huntington Beach, California 92648 SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report The Huntington Beach We Agency will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an environmen al impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. r The project description, location, and the probable environmental 3 effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial: Study / XX is, / / is not, attached. oDue to the time limits manda;. ,d by State law, your response must be z sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after $ receipt of this notice . Please send your response to Tom Tincher at the address shown above. We will nee a name foF a contact person in your agency. PROJECT TITLE: OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN it PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: HUNTINGTON BEACH. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE Anri1 28, 1� Signatur ffl�-rr+ Title ____ Executive Director Telephone 714 536-5575 Reference: California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sections 15035.7,E 15054 .3, 15066. -20- nn..no 3.15 sow 4 0.p :r 400A ' C0/trifYAT1011 Mf1Q9 Pull FUND ADMINISTR IM IMMUTiOV4 VMH TIU MCRUARY Of STATI VWw"w ow "Wr*cob Swam 111M) „� r�rrsri.�w�rurrr�lull�rw��rr�ra --- - 74.* Appendix I is Addid to read: A PPWIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ?OHM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency 2. Address and Phone er or Proponent: n� ajj] 5lt�r t P AI0rL 1 IrB9K�1190 Huntidg}o„ Raub- California r9tlr2r6l�18 PIA)W536-554r, r� - �+rrrlrlr.Yir�rrwrr iswrlrirr..ur Yr.•r.. n+wr�.�- �Ily/ram/II��Y♦!1 Y rY1 tilY .wwY�� 3. • Date of Checklist Submitted .,Mav 5,1 1982— 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Op-devgIgnant Agency 5. Name i�fwoff'�( Proposal, } If applies e is VX__gg RCdCXj"i�iYr�lUt Plgwni�+..�-�rr i+�lllrr ■ �+� ZI. EWIRONMWAL IMPACTS (Explanations Of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. ) ! YE3 MAYYM NO, . 1. Earth, will the proposal result in: a. Unstable eapth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X g b. Disruptions, displacermentes com- paction or overcovering of the soil? �X c. Change ih topography or ground surface relief features? d. 11" te destruction, covering or modification or Any unique Peologic or physical features? X_ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of aoils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of. beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modifIr the channel of a river or strean or the bed of the ocean or any bay,. inlet or lake? X -21- i l 00%.oar CORTNUATIC" SNUT ti-4 FILING ADMINISTRATtVI REGULATIONS WITH THE SLZRITA,RY OF STAIN Owtvam ti 0...M0"1 CWS s.ntae IIMI) YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course �. or direction a: water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattersn; or the rate 3 and amount of surface water runor1'? X n c. Alterations to the oourse or flora of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of vurfaee water quality, including but not limited to temperatures dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _._�. _._... X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X ' G. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations! -22- I FOR FIUNO ADMINISTRATIVE RIOULAliOQNS MH T'NO WAffARY OF STATI (ftmer is oer..Mrrt c6de tors"1134&1) YES MAYBE NO � h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X_ i I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ X 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? , X , b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? .X,�, . a, Introduction of new species of , plants into An area, or in a barrier to the normal replenimWeent of existing species? X ......., ...ter .�.�.. 't.- d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5.$ Animal Life. Will the proposal resu n: a. Change in the diversity of � . species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, Fish and shellfish, benthie or anisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species ` of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or resulo in ` a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X � . d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X � • -23- wr SODA CCPMNUAT10N Will P...4 FILING ADMINISTRATIVE RIOULATlOh3 WITH THE SICRKTARY Of STATE prn.00l IS 00nrS.A0 Code$"Aoe 11700.1) 4 YES KAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise _X levels? ` b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new g it or glare? X . 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a subs•Eantial alteration or the present or alanned land use of an area? X i 9. Natural Resources. Will the propoual resu n: w a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? .._r. X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? JL r 10. Risk of U sit. Does the proposal involve a rieR of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? `X 11. Po�Rul-�ation. Will the proposal alter the locations distribution, density, or *growth rate or the human popu- lation or an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect exisETnv, hoasin�, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportatinn Circulation. Will 1e proposal resu t n: a. Oeneration of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement'l X i. { -2a- i CONTINUATION 6NIfT rti rOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE ftH-UW o.A IS WITH THE SICXlTARY OF STATE (ft w e M amrMN1 Code Soo"I ISM) YES MAYBE NO b. Effecto on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? e. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to )rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X i 14. Public Services. Will the proposal We an e7rect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? yl,, .�.__ ._._.. e. Maintenance or public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use or substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase n dem and mend upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new source: of energy? X -25- »w 400A f-� CONTINUATION 1XIIT t FILING ADMINISTRATIVE REOULATIL..l WITH THE SICAITARY Of STATE (Prow M dww�ewt Cede it.t�l��11�10.!) Apo YES MAYBE: NO 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result Ina nee or new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natueal gas? b, Communications systems? e. Water? I d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm crater drainage? �. f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result n: a. Creation of any health hazard or "u potential health hazard (excluding W mental health)? �.. X b. Exposure of people to potential : health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result 0 in Me obsTruction of any scenic = vista or view open to thl. public, or S will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically i offensive site epen to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the .proposal result 3n n ImpaEt upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Arc__h_eool�l_oz�ical//Historical. Will the proposal result- in an aMeration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? i -26- 4 1 oc�rra+u)►nsxw s� FOR HUNG A A1N19MT YT R"UtA119fiMS WJTH THE SW"AAY OF RTATI ' (?*MOW 10 fwrwoo m We ON$"112al) � J P,E NO f 21. Mandatory Fin� Of,,JiMni a e• (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or -animal eon unity, reduce the nutaber or j restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California j history or pYehietory? ba floes the project have the poten. i tial to aehi*ve short-test, to. the disadvantage of long-terra, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brier, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x J c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, $ but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource Is relatively errall, but where the affect of the total of those im pacts on the environment is significant.) ...._. x d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either diraetly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF WIRONREIVAL VALUATION � -21- ...400A • C0"NUA1100 INSET FOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE RIGULAYIONS WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE (►vnrwtt M 04"nWH d Cod•Wen Mal) ? IV. DETERMINATION } 1 (To be completed by the Iiad Agency) 1 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION i will be prepared. 0 I find that although the ropoalr:: r f g N project could have a significant effect on the environment, 'there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet r, have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date ApCil 2L 19� M Charles W. Thomp or;gna .ure M « For inaton Reach Reggvelopment Agency _ h O x (i I t I r' -28- I RE9UEST Fun REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACT],,, pie Apra 1 28, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment A cy �. Submitted b;: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratof� Prepared by: V 9 Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subjoct: RECEIVING AND TRANSMITTING PRELIMINARY REDEVELOPMENT PLANS Statement of Issue, 9soommendetion,Analysis, Funding Souros,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to Section 33233 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, attached are preliminary plans vhich have been approved by tha Planning Commission on April 20, 1982 as reflected 11Jy the appropriate resolutions which are included. The next step of the redevelop.-i►ent process for each of the proposed project areas is for the Redevelopment Agency to acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plans, adopt said preliminary plans and direct the Secretary to transmit said plans to the appropri- ate government agencies. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolutions for each preliminary plan. ANALYSIS: This step is still a preliminary step in the overall legal process which must be. pursued in the implementation of a redevelopment program. Upon adoption and trans- mittal of these documents, staff will prepare a proposed redevelopment plan which reflects a refinement of this information, as well as the appropriate EIR. These documents will be forwarded to the Redevelopment Agency next month. The information contained in the EIR and the proposed plan will then be discussed with affected property owners, taxing agencies and interested persons during the next several months, with the formal consideration of these documents not coming until some time in August of this year. At that time a formal public hearing will be required on all the information generated to date and throughou` the next several months. FUNDING SOURCE: None required. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution #23 receiving the preliminary plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. 2. Resolution #24 receiving the preliminary plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. 3. Resolution #25 receiving the preliminary plan for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelop- ment Project Area. 4. Resolution #26 receiving the preliminary plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment i Project Area. CWT:TT:jb A1.•IM•