Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRedevelopment Agency - Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area I f -- t rZD BY CITY Co 01tST FOR CITY COWINCIL/ . RED : ELOPNIENT AGENCY ACTION RH89-09 19 r I Z.-z' Date January 17. 1989 TY L Submitted to: Honors a ayor/Chairman and City Council/Agency Members Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator/Executive Director 10V Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Devel me Michael C. Adams, Acting Director of Community Development Subject: PIERSIDE VILLAvE STATUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDEL; ACTIONS Consistent with Council Policy? i ) Yes J New policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommmxktion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STA't'ENU K EISM: Pursuant to your direction, staff has placed on the agenda for discussion purposes and direction a Status Report on the Pierside Village portion of the`Main-Pier Phase I Project. In I994, the Agency Megan its first implementation efforts in the Main-Pier Project Area, and as a part of those efforts an initial development entity was selected for the project that has become known as Main-Pier Phase I. The site was bounded by Lake Street, Walnut, Main Street, a portion of the Pier, and the Pacific Coast Highway frontage from the t ifeguzrd Headquarters to the Pier, bounded by the beach frontage road on the ocean side. RECOMM NDATI NS: Dir t staff so epare an a ed Piers Village pl utilizin a "c` of restts" cone . t, eliminatin 11 other ialty reta es; an 2) Receive and file this report. BNALY.SZ: The initial development entity selected to work exclusively with the Agency, Huntington Pacifica Development Group, included four principals• Negotiations took place-from late-1984 through mid-1985. The negotiations concluded in August of 1985, with the adoption by`the Redevelopment Agency of the Main-Pier Phase I DDA. This Disposition and Development Agreement pe'ovided for an initial scope of development that included in part a 300-room, first-class hotel and related retail uses, and a 75,000 sq.ft. specialty commercial complex. With the Disposition and Development Agreement being approved, the developer spent an extensive period of time seeking to obtain financing and develop a final Land Use Plan for implementation. In October of 1986, these efforts resulted in a revised development concept that was approved along with the First Amended Disposition and Development Agreement, and the initial Plerside Lease in October, 1986. Final entitlement project approvals were obtained in December, 1986, through the Coastal Commission and efforts continued to develop a viable Phase • -ilan for implementation. I'� 1 'NO 4AW t...+-- +s'1Ca ;�. ....�: � -...:a. .. .., _..,. � .^ ,. . ..,...^ . ,. .. - ..�',:.,.`. ^a..'t . .:tt"+�� �3'��..r:Qx'�:,'y�i,;y'd • �'.y"�^*. l t J " Through`1987, the planning efforts continued and a change of direction began to emerge with respect to our Main Street redevelopment efforts. The 3DI Plan previously approved i in concept began to evolve into which has become the "Village Concept." This changing direction was finalized with conceptual approval by the Agency of the entertainment complex in lieu of the hotel in March of 1988, and Agency approval of the "Village., Concept" in April of 1988. It is important to note that in the first several years of our Implementation efforts a visitor-serving corridor essentialiy'from Main to Beach, Walnut to Pacific Coast Highway was envisioned. 'Under the visitor serving concept Ferside.Village was a key,development component and ser,vet!46 provide a needed specialty/retail use as an important element of the visitor--serving concept..With a shift in dtrection"and removal of that visitor--serving core,ewe began tore-think..the need`for a'gmcialty/retail village'bf the,scope and mainitude originally envisioned for,Pierside Village. As the Village planning efforts continued,"land use conflicts began to occur In teri ii of Pierside Village drawing the retail life I16rNain Street to that area rather than becoming'the specialty/retail as once envisioned. Throughout this period of time, the economics of this project were being continually evaluated by Agency staff,,our,consultants, and developer representatives. UltiMitely, a point was reached where the.viablilty not-only from a land use but"an economic standpoint brought us to the conclusion that the Pierside Village concept should be modified to achieve a more''desirable land use, as well as an economically viable project. Thus,lhe'decision to proceed with a cluster of restaurants rather than to attempt a specialty/retail center that would be in direct competition with the revitalized Main Street retail core that we were attempting to create. Staff has reviewed this matter with various Agency consultants and our recommendation Is as outlined above to proceed with the preparation of an Amended Plerside Village Plan. In our analysis, this action is appropriate based upon project economics and the ap�rcved modified development concept as now being implemented for the Main Street Core. Bj�DING SQUR�: Available Agency Contractual Services funds. . i� ALTERS ACTibNS: Continue with original Pierside Village concept. PEC/DLB:Ip Y 423Or } I� I ' .A'SrTM✓ .a "' a j.•'.. •T. • �,... ..I. .. .. ♦.. x .. .. r .. _ .. I .. .,i.,,.a •S'w.}�•W;{h•S„+.',-1/'1Nitwt.�'vr.I�1T.R�•': it Page 8 - Council., . ,ency Agenda 1/17/89 F-2. AQ nCyl PIER E VXLU!UE sbI,TAT—US R9EQRT S RECQM ZNDED ACTIONS Communication from the Deputy City Administrator/Economic Development, transmitting pursuant to Co+jncil/Agency direction a Status Report on the Pierside Village portion of the Main-Pier Phase I Project. The site is bounded by Lake/Walnut/ Main/a portion of the Pier and the Pacii:ic Coast Highway frontage from the Lifeguard Headquartern to the Pier, bounded by. the beach frontage road on the ocean side. (Communication dated. 12/15/88 from Halcyon Ltd. inelud(ad) Recemmefidi Action; (1) Direct ep�.,. -amended"", i rside Village plan utilizing "Cluster of resta ts''t- concept, elimin ng all otheF specia retail ulsep O (2) Receive and file this report. ,rYa� s ,4� t -� prr rie A% . wed Pe..side vvy/ys '•4r. Glrl+rtnRfi.! , r►//'�ryoee:i�ttf rre�l4til fifes C�ycce�"t I-�,{�,tirleHf's rt.x/ �+►.AwiMA.-rr- 40 !6#caas MC fiAt l�p•f�e+• r7r'/JtAwwl/i r k 1s.1+ -/N'//�fc+ifiis� +►� irur� rsffiat.�c++w1�L` APf7ntlLt� �'� t � .r. j t Hal on • Rcal state. cors Development"Unselors Project&Awt Managers 930 Muntxomcty Strcct,Suitc(00 San Francisco,CA 941M 415.391.1896 FAX 415.989 9516 December 15, 19C8 Mr. Doug l.a Belle Deputy City Administrator City.Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Doug: As you requested 1 have done some thinking about the City's new plans regarding the Pierside Village site. The following paragraphs detail my initial reactions and recommendations to the new concept for the south side of the Pacific Coast Highway. jJ &pact og !Vain Street 1 . Developing a program along the beach wit _only fogs service instead of the larger festival retail center formally envisioned far the site W'61 have largely positive impacts for retailing along Main Street. Retailers who would have preferred the Pierside location will now be pare receptive to the entreaties of brokers representing Main Street tenant spaces; the mix of retail shops along Main Street will be more varied, responding to a larger market; and the size of the retail program can probably be increased 10,000 to 20,000 s.f., primarily in the specialty and apparel categories. The only negative impact implied by a restaurant only development along the beach will be a slight erosion of restaurant potentials along Main Street, the festival orientation of Pierside might have Jurped_off many residents in its immediate vicinity because of its contrived environment. The new restaurant-only program, while still responding to .� (till w F�St,Srix 10M 11n,171 rN�W,Swat*1 H.rrJGr�Cwwnr>"06101 .!bowl,Fkvi&3tW ItLi.�7•tlR1 3RS•3�S-/lA1 SW�lg3.ltAs --•-.r�..r�KT+Y:.:R"vt'.:r:.::•:. .-- ....... i.•e..:..L'<... :X.:.... �..-. :.w. .� ...... .,....:a.a.r........ ...-.n•aa.i,r.v_ar�.a.n+.+s.r•r i7ui►'._. f i • F t Halcyon d. Reif Estatc...,s•isors DovIopmcnt Counsclnrs Prnjcct!t:Assct Managers demand regionally, will be less tourist-oriented and therefore, more appealing to locals. Neighborhood residents may be more inclined to patronize the restaurants with a local flavor particularly in winter months and in the process reduce the opportunity for more restaurants to prove in along Main Street. z STRUCTURING THE LEASE We have performed a significant amount of work on'projects in coastal locations involving publdic/private pairtnersh`ips. After looking through my files I found the following information out►ining the basic parameters of public/private lease deals in locations on the west cost and more detailed information on projects in the east. Note that in most cases, there are substantial funds involved to subsidize the parking, utility relocation, site improvementsor demolition. In exchange for such''front-end costs, the public sector typically takes an equity kicker. Their percentages vary and are a function of what is needed to make the unique requirements of the deal work in the particular marketplace. We would be happy to help you negotiate/evaluate any proposals for restaurant development you receive over the next few months. 1 • S s _ f /rp6358/6358 Page 2 �XT�Ti:.lJS•r�w�.'—ti:�.,.—yr+.t.r?ew�is>.w".::•JM• . ..y Halcyon d. Real Estate ndviu►ts Development CAmnsclnts Project&Asuet hianagm grgundd Lease Sumnar es QUEEN MARY, SARUSE GOOSE - LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA LEASE: Minimum rent of $1,850,000. However, a rent credit of $1,800,000 makes net minimum rent $50,000. The following are the percentage rents: ` Food 3.0% j Hotel 7.5 Marina 10.0 Museum 5.0 ,.. Parking 5.0 Sublease 5.0 Other 20.0 Parking (2,500 spaces @ $2.00 per day) is in a surface tot, financed by the City of Long Beach. Horrever, the rity of Long Beach developed and operated this project (at a substantial loss) until five years ago. HARBOR ISLAND - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON Ground lease is currently44 500 annuall i i , y cr n as n e into . $194,112 in 1988 when the project is scheduled for completion. According to Jim Rice at the Port of Seattle, percent rent is 7.5% of total sales. { The marina and parking lot were financed by the developer. /rp6358/6358 Page 3 t..�.,.T".ad"cin•Mls:. sAt++:�ri•.i..a:•Mi+ram .. ...� �ii._xt.-.�.«.-s..+a'.r....'tit w.. ...:.t.__.w�..«.-�...... w.,.-�...,....-...w.w.ww ,N . 'i r Halcvon �1. Rcal l:statc jadVisota UMIoprncnt G>umcclors Pmjcct!sc Assct himogm Pier 39 - San Franci;.co, California Lease: With Port, $500,000 minimum ($300,000 originally) against 8% of lease rents (probably 1% -of sales) escalating as sales grow. Parking: Developer financed 1,000 spaces servicing 200,000 square feet of retail. Rates of $.85 every 20 minutes and $12 for 12 hours. Parking free after 5:00 p.m. with restaurant validation. Restaurants pay $35 per validation. Pier 66 - SeDttle. -Washington Lease: With Port, $.20 'per square foot office and 1.16 per rim square foot retail minimum against 1% of gross sales with escalations every five years. �4 Parking: Developer financed on land outside Port Jurisdiction. Two hundred seventy spaces total plus two stories of office on top. hack London Yillaae - Oakland,,-CAI Iforula Lease: With Port, 10% annual return on developed land value minimum against the following percentage of gross sales: Restaurant 3.5% Hotel 6.0 Hotel Restaurant 2.5 Office 8.0 Retail 1.2 i { /rp6358/6358 Page 4 : I As • ns-m.:;'e+L4':. ..,v Ye'.:.5...:w».';.'-.�.+::7..:�w-.w-....r.-ai.;... ...r:::.,.:�,.....:it wn........+..-.•..�.++,+....�r....•.�......w.�. _ Halcyon 3. Rcal F-%wic ndvium DMIOPittcnt G)UnfdOn Pmject&Asset Alanagm Parking: Developed by Port, approximately 1,500 spaces servicing over 200,000 square feet of retail, restaurant and hotel space. Expected to produce revenue equal or in a ,ess of cost. 4 Shoreline Mijjagg Logg 8eacfi. California Lease: With Tideland's (Marine Bureau), $125,000 fixed rent against the following percentages of gross sales: Food 3% New Boats 1 "' Brokered Boats 8% Chandlery 3 Retail 2 Other 10 Percent rent for the first four years differed to years 11 * ' through 14 accruing interest each year. Parking: Developer financed, no structure, small lot for this 55,000 sq, ft. project which is surrounded by municipal parking r ' lots. �.I i /rp6358/6358 Page 5 .. r PRO IEC(/tttt/(LAWLUMi 61A W-WING CItT/LVADw1ER CiTT/LMOVAN INAL 1'a cl Umts"02 1?EYElgt'ER (t.T) tTERATtoNAL MotalRurym C&PIT-ft C Tttg ltw UXT- Era11IT iJ ttsllenat Place t 125,000 Ill externs tJN1 S security 1 IT 500 006 Rest.) Rulldlty i lopmements 13t1,25o.000 iT30.000 Notional Press/ttash.DC 37,500,000 Total City hawing The Rant Ca-Foly The Gallery at Market E. 300,000 At exterior CAM t security Totat praject cost flnanced by city• Urki urn !gory t cot tery II/ pP►n a anjor portion of PAlladelphis, PA Interior 'Jul i security The Roust Co.poly 1 "erborptaee/seltiaore, W 141,000 ' Att exterior CAN ut security city contributed sit site prep work 140,I100.000 Konet Unknown J The None Cagmy plus a ajar portion of a 1.3 acres afpraot.•,td slts wnittel sm unt of Interior security vehaud Initial equity 0 apprx. SI.000,am taken out b r year; city wint. ka pens. firw+cing post an prMlse • Trapper's Alley 200.000 una wn >< I.m.me 4DA0 =r,300,000 11ons Detroit, Mt z'Wp'qW total Clt.+ towing IncsJ.OM Cordiah Extr y AtsoG, private debt and 11.SM - tqulty. Peru tending/Phill. PA 2M,000 All exter.Cu1M It secure IS IDIOM,000 U)S4 ; 152.{04,000 •0• The Erma Dovelop.Co. i Incl. glaterfroct Fork 2,100,000 Ext prole one Irv, V1O.OM 10 1t,300,000 Rouse 0 Assoc. Marina i Dockage, plug 16.500.000 Guar. an tosses for 10 1420,000 per year far .600,000 Totat City funding isxtln• prlvale debt GrntlRw) finterior aecurlty to be Grand Ptots,-Boat L^sln i funded out of 916.58 Bulkhead 0 eat. cost of 13S,i100,000 guarantee to 1 !#.001,oCO). S tlattr 1t. PaYlliont 42,D00 Developer refebursed for It 3,000,000 Lava Acqulsitioa 12S,S001000 tone ...� F flint, MI/ all exterior But i security 3,000.000 Site Iapreveim Enterprise amtopwnt plus 15%administrative 8,M'W0 fat Mors s�.1Slt =: i fee 4,D00,000 C&A to secure'2rd srortgage 1,M,000"Culsksto j ring).Equity relsed•elty . r 3{ I AN Totat City fmdine n/project Part { OUILIKE Of ICCEST ARRAINCEMIS faOWIN Cl11ESlUWCWILIIS NO 910lYLt1 taaA"e RETBtL'SEYEICPfRs ftC11I) h MUECYtca11 wVWWERZNEYELf]rE aHITAI/PARfICtPJ<i1011 CjjT/tJMa0lalER tpm 1tw 10 06YELO1'ER , Voter street Par111an/ min. Rentair $10O per year SM of ask flow before debt lervict s� flint, Mt/ Enterprise Development Participations SIX of cash flow after preferred distrf- Itat"Awre of all orsits L sff•olts arnsne- [,alt" to dievetoper, sit opMtlng on- rent eqenaee "Met (Including w"agnrent fees) A debt' service (Inctudire debt =Ice deferred and aeeruw)l not axpected to eoawora" • until the 20th Year, ' Procerds frog" first esortgpe 0 MSltt debt service Is accruebts for the 30 jest tent of the sortsstt •ortslde/ Mn. Rentalt first tweew of cub flow ss a return first S25(1,00O of cash flow otter debt i Toledo, W/ of debt (Inctudlry 42 interest) swvlce= 30%of cash flew thereafter Enterprise DevotaMs t Participations SM of cash flow after preferred s2S0 D00 Recapture of sit on-site i off•etto re "*- distrlbrtlen to dwreteper; all "aratirl +lent espawes tlnelu a�dird n"ement feet) R . es service MMICIPel office ccaptex/ Min. Rentals 21.6 a►ltilon Jilt cash flew to dsvetoper after percentage Austin, Tx (Proposer!) refs ore taken out by Cltyp city pare for Participation" YX of gross hotel rsversr t Qx of swktrgt parking+rith tax-exempt gads and lases 5%of rotate and office revenues (city re- to developer 4 celves the 0rastor of atnlsaoe or pereentop rants tt 3 1 Sixth Street Marketpleca/ [tin. Rentatt. 31,000 per year first 210,000 of cart flew; 4a to 50R of Rlchrand, VA/ cash flew Oereafter Enterprise Devetopxrent Participations 50% to 6=of cash flew after preferred re- Wm to davotoper, at: aperstlnQ expenses Recapture of eft in-site i off-alto sane• tineludtsq veneva sent ;%es) i Me servlts am% expenses } r Jacksonvltte LeMind Min. Rentals 2t00,000 per Year deferrobto for first 5 73%of cash floe the debt serrieo other Jackerwitle, tLf Years of operation; deferred bolarree than partieipatltn" The Nows, Ca-•ern► accrued Idtlrout Werast w4si solo or' reftnencing of the project 1Z%on alulty Proceeds free parnwm* toans No Interest with partfcl•, Nar"ment fees projected In ex-Peas of potion In 25Ti of cash flow after stl operating axperres- 1500,000 by third eperatlrl Year tincludire (Inctufing srnagemant foen) Wpr*ject2 Pepe 2 • y a n WECT/CITT�tLAW34 ats) GA JX.G91NQ CIST/LANDLOLM CITY/LaNga m loin rmmcT OtllELte'EN•f t' ' ;' DEVELd'EN ts.r) 0"AT gag CGMTNI 1T*='• CWSTAL C0 Rl1WIW! C06T EmTIT Fortalde/Telo&, aN 56,000 All exterior CAN 9 security s %300,000 1st snrtgsis!Alt interest rate (1) Sfy.000,000' Nana Incl. Naterfrant Fork. 9 2,0 0.000 gulld pad i truck ttanu! Narina i Dockage ' 50.000 Fork laprove tt` . ,ogo total City fundlr*. Municipal office Coeplex 835,600 Develgter rasponilble for* S 63,000,000 cartiflestes of partielpation L20Q,000,000 1s-= } :} Austin, TN (proposed) Ott operstswWoarrement 135.000.000 priv.debt/sngtity Nstson-Caary CorWIes Ord costs of public i privets SU9,000.00o City of Austin areas 1 sixth street Marketplace/ 6t,000 Alt exterior CAN i mmity = 4.200,000 U ALi funds S2r.000,000 hone } tticMrond. VA/ (enhanced level for arss:, .3,500,000 Mock *rant fund Incl. sat! Enterprise Devstopnast *Wax. S city blocks agme 1,300,000 GrW*L from 0T No prlv.debt t 10"o rark top swam t Estobllahed city office 2,500 1qAtytb*IvA market rate)from -of downtown promotion • Nlclnnond Corp. CaAs. with an amr.Mt buket of s300,000 O,, Total city funding. y - Jacksrmllle Lording/ 123,000 Jill ext. CAN i securfty S 10,000,000 Construction loon 2 5% Interest 331.000,t10o S1,t100,00o Jocksawfite, FL Intl. reptaceaxnt of rate (2) (ins. 019" 10 32,000,000 The(loins corg ay exter.osenitles 10,000,000 Feswntant loan; interest free prly. debt) with .Sx participation after all Operating expense Including sxauge• vent fees; repaid only at sale or rsfl.w frg of tM"project . S 20,000,000 Total City funding NOTEt TOorsutton supplied by the following saureOst- I The Enterprise Development Carpeny ' The 11ouse Company tt. S. Deportwent of Noosing and Urban DrMopment Downtown Devatopoent Authorltlr,% The City of Austin (1) leveraged off of proceeds from OW funds wed In another Incoma•proWne property; anabla to use dtrxt LDAC flnenctn0 due to total absence of • equity In the project. 12) if the full 510,W0,000 is unevallebts to City fuxns at a given time, developer war berm the difference from s cow erelet IOsder ad lily will releburse dmtoper for Interest coots in ernes of 52. . . r pool 2 i' Halcyon'�i. Rcal Eaatc....viujrs DmIopmcat Coumclors Pmjc►t&Awt Alattagcrs blternatiye Fiparcin �lwnership Structures There are basically three structures of ownership and development possibilities at the City's disposal , these are briefly outlined in the paragraphs below: , Alternative One - Sfngle Master Developer This approach entails procuring the interest of a master developer,-for the development of the entire project. The City would simply lease the land giving fdll development responsibility to a developer. Little upfront financial cost would be imposed on the city, but the city would also loose a great deal 'of control over the type of restaurants eventually built and aise will have to be satisfied with a lower financial rate of return from the development.. Alternative Two - City and Master Developer Partnership In this case, the city would work in partnership with a master li developer to build the project. The City would provide the financing far the development of infrastructural improvements associated with parking and lease a large development pad to a master developer. The master developer would then build the restaurants and leave them to tenants. This is undoubtedly the basic structure of the previous deal with the Pierside development. Percentage rent of gross receipts would probably be approximately 3% of gross sales. i 1 i /rp6358/6358 Page 10 o. { t c Male �'at�d. Real 1:statc Advisors Development Counselor I Projcct&Asset Atanagers Alternative Three - City Master Developer In this case, the City would be the development manager (oor wouli hire a &onsultant to'fill thris rple bn a, e.basis) and would be financially responsible"for developing most of the Improvements on the site. Restauranteurs would either build on prescribed pads or perhaps occupy butidng shells constructed by the City. This scenario implies the highest degree of risk for the City as well as the highest revenue potentials. Percentage rents would probably approximate 6% to 8% of gross . sales, but if restaurants failed, the City would be responsible for a far higher debt servfce than is implied by Alternatives One and Two. A phased approach to developing the restaurants in this case might be the most appropriate. TENAXTT CONSIDERATIONS r R The Size and�Number of Restaurant$ Instead of limiting the new restaurant chuices offered along the waterfront to two new food service destinations of 8000 to 10000 square feet, i believe the community would be better `` served and there would be potential for increased sales volume if the space was divided among four or five, obviously smaller, restaurants. ; > r Why? 1 • Regardless of the level of quality and the attraction a waterfront location presents, there is a limit to the frequency /rp6358/6358 Page It Halcyon mod. Real Ztltr'id►•ison Davlopiucnt Coon►clors • Pniject& Amet Atanagers in which most people will visit a restauralit for a meal . Two new restaurants provide Just two additional dinning experiences for local residents; they can only offer two menus, two interiors, two price points, two levels of quality, etc. Putting four or five restaurants of 4000 to 6000 square feet on the waterfront, each of which with a distinctive type of cuisine, will undoubtedly increase the likelihood that people will visit the site more often. This should increase sales per square foot and the corresponding percentage rent paid to the city. A larger variety of restaurants should also increase the relative quality of all of the establishments (assuming there Is little or no collusion among the operators) by virtue of the increased competition they represent. If a restaurant operator on the waterfront looses touch with the culinary preferences of �. the community, there will be an immediate (and probably precipitous) drop in sales because the public will have a large number of additional establishments from which to choose that I offer an equally compelling view of the ocean. 1 i I don't avant to imply to you that actually executing multiple restaurant deals will be easy. The concept I have Just outlined is unusual and will be greeted with some ske ticism b g P Y many restaurant operators. Potential tenants will recognize the competitive issue I outlined above as well as others such as the increased star;-up costs and reduced operating efficiencies associated with smaller restaurants; and concerns regarding the compatibility, quality and target: market of adjacent restaurants. t /rp6358/6358 Page 12 1 i MAC n i. Kcal rstate,..►visors Doviopnrent Counselors Project BSc Asset hlauagers The multi-tenant concept is unusnoi and it is reasonable to assume that it will require a greater level of effort in the tenant search process and perhaps a higher level of public investment initially in construction. However, the benefits of a beachfront location are such that a restauranteur or master developer should be attracted to the site if the restaurant program is reasonable, properly marketed and fair. The type of deal the multi-tenant concept would require would probably be numbers 1 or 2 outlined in the previous section. jj Optimal Te an nts I Tenants selected for the project would optimally be establishmet•`.s that could not be easily found in the Orange County/Los Angeles metro area. I recommend you consider expanding the scope of your tenant search to include operators located in Northern California, San Diego County, Arizona and perhaps even Texas. The city obviously can't exclude local operators and if they are more qualified and make better offers than restauranteurs from out of the region, they should be chosen for the project. However, those local restaurant developers who are selected to operate waterfront restaurants should be required, or at least asked, to consider slightly altering their concept and changing the name of their establishment. This will give the impression that Huntington Beach's beachfront restaurants are t extraordinary, one of a kind establishments (even though it may . not really be the case). 1 /rp6358/6358 Page 13 ^^�....++�:.w.:., s .,i�'. ...{ .. .,. �u.. i .. . ."-M r .. .-,...,....,....�.. .. ... ..... •.+...-a...__..........-..«r�.........v.u..aa...2u,`a4s+.KM.+�+. w H2.4cyot d. Kcal Estate Aviurn DmIt pnicnt Counselors Project&Asset managers Phasin TherE might be an inclination to buildout all of the restaurant space planned for the waterfront in one phase. I recommend a two phased development approach be employed if the economics of I developing the parking structure necessary to accommodate the new restaurants allows for a phased approach to restaurant development. There is a possibility that the full program will saturate the market with product, particularly if it is built before the first of the hotels planned for the "Waterfront" development. The last thing we want is a restaurant destination that is marked by failure in its initial period of operations. Unlike a specialty or retail district center, the negative impacts of a phased approach to developing the restaurants will be minimal. A wait and see attitude has few drawbacks and will 4 mitigate potential problems associated with oversupply. Up1r gn Coasidgrations The obvious reason a restaurant location along the Pacific Coast Highway in Huntington Beach represents a significant opportunity for restaurant development is the view of the ocean it provides. All too often architects and interior designers fail to fully incorporate the revenue enhancing capacity a view represents into as many tables in the restaurant as possible. The ci,iy should require that all new restaurants along the beach architecturally respond to the desire of customers to look at the water while they eat. /rp6358/6358 Page 14 i . .-...,.�..r...r..aa-t•a.. . . 'T;". i,,. :'!•... r ... ,yR'.. ...�,.r... �- ___.._..�........�tt14�/�+arsr'+Y�'� t Halcyot�d. . Real Fstatc,.Jvisors bcsxloP►aenr G►u►uelnn Proicct&A ct 111a11agcrs. There is really no great trick to this. An example of restaurants that incorporate the concept of "a view from every table" are the numerous dinner clubs in Las Vegas and Reno offering live entertainment. In Huntington Reach, live entertainment is simply replaced by surf, sea gulls and sunsets on a stage of water and white sand. Some obvious elements that should be incorporated into the restaurant's layout are outlined below. o The area behind the bar should back into a wall, not a window, to the ocean (as it does in Maxwell's). o Beach level restaurant space should be avoided if tolls possible. Passing pedestrians block views of the ocean and invade the feeling of intimacy of diners. The difference between the sales levels of the Green Burrito and Maxwell's undoubtedly illustrate this point. o Multiple docks on the restaurant floor permitting a view of the water (and also the beach if possible) from virtually every table should be required of every restaurant. o Implied in .a multi-level restaurant emphasizing views f are obviously high ceiling heights and floor to ceiling ' windows. Problems with overheating and glare from .y sunlight can be overcome through the use of awnings and 4� levelors. Even though the area's warm climate will mitigate any significant problems associated with keeping the large volume of the space warm in winter, t ceiling fans could be employed to force warm air down on patrons heating the restaurants would be too costly in cooler winter months. /rp6358/6358 Page 15 S ww•.w..ic.S�2:JTJ:l,Y:"7it'.1 .._ 2.':. .. ... .<•p..:a .w.._............... .h.:-:;w-,.:.....- .. ....r......._,..� ..._...-..,.�...w.wrr w..uMw rlc+rxrwv4��r."+^^'. I , Hxlcor�'d. Kcal ritme..i0surs Un-clopltunt collmdon 1 o There might be a desire to spread the restaurants out in linear fashion northeast to southwest along the beach. Although this is understandable given the limited area between the beach and Pacific Coast Highway, it should be done as sparingly as possible. Optimally the new restaurants along the Pacific Coast Highway will become a district unto itself and people should feel �I comfortable walking from one restaurant to another. ' t 13 CONCLUSI011 In closing, I want to express my belief that you have made the correct decision by deciding to forgo development of the larger 'I Pierside Program. The retail in a specialty center of that type would have been contrived and its product line targeted to I tourists and regional residents which probably would reduce its '4 acceptance in the long run by residents of Huntington Beach. By keeping the beachside program oriented to food service, regional and tourist oriented shops can be incorporated into the tenant mix along Main Street which will undoubtedly strengthen the image of the downtown district. g 9 I look forward to our next meeting and your comments. Until then, I remain, Sincerely, Robert Cline 1f Senior Associate /rp6358/6358 Page 16 t • ..4VtH v..W JCL.•• r cµ. . . _.7 .r. .... .... . ..-._....-._._....... .. .rl. ................wr........-.-«.....w ram. .r.w..+i+M+Wr.�.^.»W.w.M�ML++/ �' . C WTN 7 H t4o' y' . A Lw vq. N•a� �'•` �$r�' � �'.'3 .RD's T� T�•Q �!•} -( �'$-- �� �VA1l�_ �.. �Yu�tt� �l,'C•. I L-7� 1 -$;LT-S U S7. FsS.�OCG1rls')o ? -, 914 5 r"-' T, k•8- A�"l 47 -3"t .�-1.qr'�' 3oS-•�,ir�•/Y�kl,v.sr.� /�►•!� a�'t--1�3--1� Cgn,n�¢�r,!�_(�,��. . . ... ...7�0-V 4)6)4I$' Or,,nivee, 14•(3. 33 j ©.S" tv�✓�✓S' •�,���n/rodf- . .�;. t HMaAj �! CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH { COUNCIL. • ADMINISTRATC'R COMMUNICATION mar 104"81Acn To Honorable Mayor and From Paul E. Cook City Council Members City Administrator Subject CITY COUNCIUAGENCY/ Date December 8, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MAIN-PIER STUDY SESSION In accordance with your earlier discussion, It was your action to set a study session with the Planning Commission for Monday, December 14 1987, to review the status of the Downtown specific Plan, the 3DI Study, and related planning questions in terms of implementing our revitalization and redevelopment efforts in portions of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. In view of other pending items for consideration on the 14th, and the *ime staff anticipates will be needed to adequately address the above matters, It is recommended that the Main-Pier study session be scheduled for your regular fourth Monday Agency meeting on January 25, 1988. Staff will be prepared to present a brief overview of the status of various public Improvement and private development activities within all of the project areas, and specifically the Main-Pier Project Area, at your December 14 meeting. Staff has advised the Planning Commission that this matter is being rescheduled for January 25. Staff will be distributing within the next several days under separate cover to Planning Commission and City Council Members a packet of materials that staff would suggest be the basis for the January 25 study session. Prior to that date, staff will be providing additional materials to the Council and Commission for review, analysis, and discussion at the January study session. Respectfully submitted, Paul . Cook, City Administrator PEC:lp 3428h co REQUEST FAR REDEVEL7�4 - HonorableVAOENCY ACTION 1, T��• ci r RH 87-80 November 23, 1987 Date 4,`Submitted to: hairmt n n tv�lopment Agency Members Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator/Chief Executive Officer Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Community Developm t Subjects RECOMMENDATION TO SCHEDULE A JOINT CITY COUNCIUAGENCY/ PLANNING COMMISSION DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN STUDY SESSION Consistent with Council Policy? P4 Yes ( j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue,Rocommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: I i' STATEMENT OF„]��: The City Council/Agency has previously approved as a conceptual model, the 3Dl master plan that was completed in late 1986. This action was taken as Agency Resolution No. 139. ECO MENDED ACT10: `i Schedule a joint study session with the Planning Commission for Monday, December 14, 1987, to review the Downtown Specific Plan and the 3DI conceptual plan. ANALMS: As we move forward with our Implementation efforts for the Main--Pier �. Redevelopment Project Area as amended, It would be appropriate to review the overall planning documents that will govern our downtown redevelopment efforts. In view of this, a study session would be appropriate at an early date to complete this review. ALTERNATIVE A�OIN: Schedule a joint study session for an alternate date acceptable to the members of the City Council and Planning Commission. WRINGSOURCE: None ATTAR: Agency Resolution No. 139 PEC/DLB:Ip } 3382h Flollles •♦'A�id1fi %.� ;SF X r• •'e+i (.! 'k, ..r'; •.! .:+ ., `i.,;i __. !A S'. S,R� n��•1,�,��.M�'7'!__^•ZZ•"}},, TT" F -�� CA 86-35 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BiACH COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION rwvtr.crav�ru ri TO Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, City Council Members City Administrator Subject MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT Date May 9, 1986 PROJECT AREA, PHASES I do 11 ! Attached for your review Is the pier side development schematic plan. The plans propose approximately 120,000 sq.ft. of net leaseable area and over 600 parking spaces. The project proposes a pedestrian link to the hotel and retail development, Inland of Pacific Coast Highway. This part of the project Is proposing a 280-room, all suite hotel with ~restaurant, lounge, meeting rooms, retail shops, and health club, off of a central atrium court. Adjacent to the hotel, there will be approximately 80,000 sq.ft. of retail, Including an 8-piex threatre. Approximately 450 parking spaces will be provided for these activities. Staff will be prepared to review these plans and the status of project negotiations In greater data with the Agency at the study session scheduled for Monday, May 12, 1986. Respec y submitted, harles W. T o pson, r City Administrator CWT:lp Attachment k, �r , .. . " .., 't. ,.;}.. ... .. „ ''�: 't r r. '•«`iit:•71ir!i�:R%r:�"ri r7,lrt? , r, 1 p'0 7 I I IIIII � �p �7111 � 0 PSD�b�I mill111TQ' sit -7 1^rr•i�-,i*:.+�.+� ..._.... .�.=•;�_,:.-- . ._. _ �-•--ter-I;.r - r- — ..•..,,�,. .i 1 ' 1 w MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMEn.IT PLAN ' HUNtItiGTON pCACN, CAUFO(iPJIA .•rn.R;to.I.0 u u H1ta.4 w7 ut.•« i i � .ter....:...-., __•-... _ _ i c i i +...,.,.�.wtir►..wrv..,..._......��-......�...J....--.• -•—..".......,«•.:nr ,.r.:. t. ..:� .. .-.t- . ... ..�...-........w.r..vu•...u.ww..-....-.-.. .. _. i t J1r4i4T:•�l.:ulr.Jai.J,:�w►if:L•a..-....+.r�+.vrvhar.+...r--x.•�c^:r••..:S'. '1' "..� � :i?.. :!:'lwl•.i,.,• ... ;`r ty.. ...rr 'wrr..,.Y:.e1:.�4�.'�.:...n.►r�.l:�t.:'�....."�'...':ff+ r 11 � r 1 ` • l I i ! s I } 1 , a • o i i BAYA►ff L MOMS DEMOPMINT i JONN CAHILL Gl516N MIAkKETM10 PCR SIDE OEYE:OPM w PACFIC PAUSADES CALIMM&A ........r�.rt �rrwr•w•w�.•+�M J KNOWN N BLACM CAUFOMA •rarer r i v*wojnvo Nome Nciowum)H i►Ao� ra WN aEll ]INWWOMAia Smc+v-I JNYAw f ' � 1 1 't r 1 I , i i t 1 1 n 1. w-..•+...r+.nar.s......-...+...�,�:+r......+....,...... .r «�. :r'.. o....:n.. ...� .. .. '��..:'!'.-'a:...........',z.....ila:�s.r..�•:w.-:w�rf,..rr.......- � ^�, 'Y P.At, �i.�" 441; ;�. }; � r i• � I I J I �' r ffi -S s ........mot... � � two . � - �• .a _ - ��; � ICI —t-. �� • )' fir • 4!r. t 1 � ter• •3.!1 �' • 4 I VI "' J ei. }♦1 ----------- ----------------- ' Slit• y, I Iy� b. 7 s _r t/ I • � r r; 41� 4����♦'�'�+.♦...����� , ��.�r��—.ter—���rl���1 •1 —��� i 1 1 l �1 1 ��a ✓ �r.�liY 1 1 1 / 1 ' 1 F I 1 � 1 t/ c, 1 � \ 1 _ Yfy j 5 PROMEMADE E•EL soft X .u+r:• • •t r•!•wr • ws q : Y r") - �_-, , . r { o i pa ....w w r IL .. 1k e e e o o e as a 0 At AA sp an a a Am er r 0 0 • as as a A; a}0 tr7* a a� a o - • ` ���11�iYJlSJ3.i.lJ - �-Y.!)J_E_F_���JI.RY���i����a On, [9ff BMW lill !eY . s - "It LATW N fw aNIHN11{A K'PLAWM W=L!- tR K1Ml►awaaa LHwt s=LL P.M=ap CfIIKTS _ Ua NLL aCMLVMII"AM.=n&M pfawtta4- �L - PMTMI•M OCCIM"wPw=diL 04-"a O-VILL i- a/of son pall!a7 Blot/wR a Mr{rll/on ILLS TILL w+.wleu. L. a e • a a c • e e o a a a • a e s e a a e s e e o e a a o a a a -� - __ I.....#.[..1°.t..tgt.....#.4............f..f.......fi..i..i`.[.....Bt..6f6[�T.[t�-r it ' � [iT[LgIii11T1[L� 5 / Lr---------j� t i Q I• ` SUCH AND TE1N CE LEVELS I �y L-6 -1 Y W Z - - - -- .I FIX -T,,i ••W.•• -4 ( _ ... r�T 1�• • ` • - � - • . - •- ._....� .�• �;t�;. ,wrt •�'�r7♦�'�y�- �`w��� K7 } • • '-� •.t -mot ._.! ��.: w:At �;.. •y! - �.� 'Z ' t,'�Y '� ♦ fi• ,ter J •, •!p9►..� _ ��••• � r� JL_$ ow • '�.�..�.��__- r� �+ �•(,. �.�•' '/ ./�� t ._- ._t--.�• ����. •ter •� r• i` � 1��,,,� '" �•� r � � h. ���.► ... _..may. - I!!�.^iw++�. �� - �•' .�l' ^ ��. -• ere _ .�A��.H _vV �•.. f �� .r.•l (� �• • ram-l +•'w .� ' « J Yr�3 � :.#`.'!`w ,y✓.•���'1r.. - -1 f .�.�ti.. �'^_�ylr:... `a.r• ...�:+f-• '• _ v►-��• � •C•►_�•'�' -! t - _ -r �'arTlr • •../rl� .-.L1G.-.r..!�.r�..T�• . .�j�I �� rx- - i►-'�!+•yam` ,�• -•.__ _- _ Jt q�e�s �«.Gtr�.r./ r :.�.�••"' - ��.`�.aL^ •�. - --` ��,� .•�-�!'- '�-R.�N- "+C�ti s.� �;,r�il� -y= -�r.'��'�f _ Sw�..~� ..:-.a �i��Ri r• ��-��I. • -�=��� - '� _ _.-.r-. �' =... �+...•.'��:r ��r�pa.��. ��,��r'- i- i fir` ... jrti ..�v�'1 --.�.w .-�i~��•'-'y•:.: - �^.•�'•�r�'9r6• �.•'�� J=�:�.w-- 1•'• ♦- � ` �i•• vt �`4. � .+�' \.r:.��-'•'`-'� ti�-lid_.�:-.. w. •:.r.K.•.- '�• e.-�- � .a v -• 1�+-i'�. _-i�i._ ..,r..-!-`.-�'+tt�} �v;r.• i..- 1.�'� �- � l !•may -•. ., - - - "` -- - ....r-:::. '��� � l:�..�:- �� -�• _��-� +j�Yam',�:�• •�- ~� _ • "'t^1�! !.'l�r..+ �.i�%ma`s y+• � �rim S I' , �� � '••�i � � t ,III ��„ I IN �\\t 11 ��• IN ��.�• -tea..' Jul I � •tip iti ,� 1 .. I • 1 _ i I r r -:-A.,k!%-- !. yl•_� L •« J•�••ifiGS• a�♦1�t:lr+giwv�/•' _ �++��''�� �/�l L•�• t� � .�.� A lk 6 AoA tj;t!!r-=m-5-ti ..�.. �� .i. .1 � '�,:w__r� � �• ••'r'� �- ��FR , ai ! •.t # 1,1W LK MY IL l }1 a �`R 71 { -'��. .� r =r M$ :: °' Ift�(i=J�•r. 'f L� a,✓•~i/�yGr,�^� '� 'y�.� . '�- �r� a�, �7t.•- � ,•.•~ '��.� -! /� f]�►V��,'��:'• ; = f ,aC• a',1�. ._• wf••- �,.a�_,�ss+++--�� '��-� .f'-�.-,�� r - t-' '�i , _�. �� t��J-ri I .i' .� ,� -s -,i'I•'.1t�' � :��;•r:'1'''` �� • .�/irKV � ��� �� ' •��1 �f i - tt. +C;.�+� i'i, "'ti'rt,•�r�''''''''�J�, ::ii � -..:� _ ice- r -/,� 1i.�� i i!` i . •'� j; r;+�• rlrL �♦. -f j '� , ...• .. ��'..... ir- ;� r. ���, '���' jt�`.� '♦r , 1. 'J�1• ot 'j{t`.l' + Stf'} t�._'�'_" -��; ri. '•- �•. �i- j• ��� 3w.�6• Y �► t s f� -:r-� mac,• ;� _" .-. �� � "�•� j• .� t .,1 p ;� z� 3 �•,1 f . ,� �� � .. • 1 -�` r ', irr�� � *+ ��� - Wit•. �,� �• f: .w�', � .—. _- � '• a� � ..,, iJ rtiz �,,�iE� ,;t4`��T —_`, YN� _�� 1 '`�� .ems' 1f ��., •.� t � - :�:C �••. s I.MI i•-`-'-�-'••' `-' ;C•'•�.�.'s rSIT � . t: •� a �I(.�{�-a,[.:.7r,:.. 44i -• T'y ...±: f�� ��t'r' ��• t k1���f'S L7,AL y'�-��{���rL,.w!.� .�+...- = o•• i�.�;��-11 .,1 �� •.r -•�.���� �'•4r• �l..f 1 / i% r r , _ Ar r,. to i ! • ' , � "�_ - ►,,. .. sue'.. t: rl rJ/ �;. ,{/t a r l'' " � •r�r it .lw =� 1 r 1w _��� ram, r•�" r t i• I I l ,s^:R':tif�?t.':. . . ..me.µ,.•:.........,_ ....__ .. ......, . ' f t ' I NN 1. N NN% 16 NX IN NN tit � • ` t.... r• 1 f > -�•�\ ��t � � w \ .♦ �� ' � .fib ��`\ •M, 1 . • \�'`; ;�{\ ' ` , ,;y1 -ems ��' /! �• ��' ,\ � ' t, "\\' •' ��`,.. ire t �� _ . 1 \ �� `� y. \�,` •a \` �'�. \\`, i is ` \ \1. i ' (P BEQUEST Mr EDEVELOPMENT A. ENC:PTIO ,R '• RII 86-21 Date March 7, 19866 / Honorable Chairman anC Redevelopment Agency Members n A ��IV Submitted to: Charles IV. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Executive fieer f- Submitted IrY: Douglas N. La Belle, Dr"puty City Administrator/Redevelopment V.Y Gt Prepared by: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE PREPARATION- r ASTER t7 PLAN FOR MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA f��,wy.•�' �, ...-- Subject: 11 Consistent with Council Policy? j74, Yes I I New Policy or Exception Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative ons, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: staf Transmitted for the Redfieatiotmts to selected developers, architeet's consideration Is a su and est planners,ofor solicit Request for Qua i peoposals regarding the preparation of a Nlaster Pun for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. REC )MMENDATION: Authorize staff to ngservices prepare and with Interested tribute a "Request v lopmennt all fications"rchitecture and/or planning osal to, contract for planning servic firms for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. IANALYSISs f and The overall downtown in the overall revitalization efforts. The city'ment efforts have reached a crucial s progress to dal.'' i implementation stage includes major studies in the downtown in relation to parking and circulation, histor a � resources and architectural guidelines, in ad Although the Downtown Downtown Specificecific Plano pla:� set ' which functions as the backbone document. dealt very clear development standards,ile timhe ie In land uses order order t aloes the mar area was ket place a broad with In generalities. This was don range of parameters and options in order to get the first redevelopment effort off the ground. These first efforts are now well under way and the Redevelopment Agency is 1 at a point In time where additional and more-detailed land uses need to be addressed. I � Staff is recommending hwi the thin the Mainency iPier Redevelopmentrect staf f to ProjectProjepoAreato obtain master planning services The selected firm and staff will review the present project areas within either in an attempt to Exclusive Negotiation or Disposition and Development Agreementr of the remaining project determine the impacts of these projects on the mark Y • i to analyze options for area. The selected firm would so be to expected development and suggest modifications the Downtown Specific Plan inture order to accomplish the various objectives. L.� P{Ohle5 I ` I 'f1ie final document would be a site specific Master Plan for the entire Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. In addition, the consultant would be expected to outline the procedures necessary for Implementation. This overall planning effort is a necessary next step in order to Initiate any more projects in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. FUNDING SOURCE: 1. Loan from the city's General Fund. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: i 1. Continue pending further information. ATTACHMENT: 1. Map of subject area. ' CIVVDL6/DIA:lp i' l 2141h �I i i _ :s .....�...r......�, . . :r.'...,.vr:.i.;.�;r•�sAisr+r�:aZ:rcat+sGaaY.3i}t1�F;'M'F}�'+t� �"'.T:F: .:��.iA,wv.rlYAl.....1.:4n r1.•`.Ii+ie lv a tJ♦.t..l:. I.. .(I.. .. ... . u. ... •. ./ .. ' t I 1 l'_ ps ID LT M M 10 1p M. ,m 11"]m ul 1;, ulOf .� oamaC�mC� �r �� �aaw�c��. j _ �• r C �C i 1�1�JOC iC C QL _}�J M FFI�lmLp4, `.� URI - w ,l Z a it 1 7 Main-Pier Project Area r CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH i CITY' OF HUNTIINGTQN BEACH � �t COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION IIUN11YCigY{[4p1 City Council Members From Robert Mandic, Mayor, To and Charles Thompson, City Administrator Subject CITY COUNCIL STUDY Date February 27, 1986 $=01( OF 3/3/86 At the Executive Session of February 24, 1986, the Agency requested that the Interviews with the Main•Pler Phase II proposers be rescheduled from March 1 Oth to March 3rd. However, due to the complexity of the various presentations and the short notice, each of the proposers has Indicated that they will be unable to make the rescheduled date. As an alternative, I suggest that all tl►e ptintpd Information previously reviewed by staff be forwarded to the Council for review prior to the March 3, 1906, meeting, and that the Study i Session preceding the meeting be rescheduled to start at 6:30 PM Instead of 5:00 PM. During this Study Session, the Council will have an opportunity to review the proposals with each other and ask staff questions. The review of the proposals with each developer will still be scheduled for March O, 986,mCe meeting recommend hould begin at 5:00 PM. I will be contacting each submittal. The March , , each of you tomorrow to get your feelings. RPM/CWT:pj I 'r _ .......... -.. .•rr T...r-...-..l:r .-...�•r.....+rn't•..r- ..�. 1"w.':Ti::it�$/',7�?. •i � 1 *J CITY AIF HUNTINIGTO N LEACH CA 85-5 v COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION i 111WI1NCTON 31AC11 I From Charles W. 7rompson To Honorable Mayor and City Administrator City Council Members Subject MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT Date January 21, 1985 1 PROJECT AREA c s I The purpose of this memorandum is to outline for you the status of our exclusive negotiations with two developers for projects in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area and to give you background data prior to the Study Session scheduled for Monday evening, January 28th. By way of background, the Main-Pier Project Area Plan was ber of 1Qr2 and subsequently amended in June of 1983. �. adopted in September � � As a part of our implementation efforts, it was your Agency's action to select two developers to work exclusively in two of the seven suba:eas In the Mnin-Pier Project Area. The Huntington Pacifica Development Group was selected for a portion of the Main-Pier subarea and Mola Development Corporation was selected for a portion of the Town Square Subarea. Exclusive Negotiation Agreements were entered Into between the developer and Agency and as a part of those agreements certain tasks and responsibilities relating to the efforts of both parties were outlined. A principal objective:of both agreements is to complete the preparation and execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement acceptbol( to both the developer and Agency. Meat recently in late November and early December of this past year, the Agency took .action to extend those agreements for a period of 180 days to allow for the completion of a mutually acceptable development plan and agreement on the "deal points" to provide for the development of portions of the respective subareas. To facilitate the principal objective of a viable Disposition and Development Agreement, staff has been diligently working with both developers and their representatives since the extensions were granted. Efforts have been concentrated towards creating a conceptual development plan and preliminary site plan for initial phases of development that is both In conformance with the City's ordinances and is economically viable. As a result of the mutual efforts of staff and developers, an overall plan for the two subareas, and specific Implementation plans for portions of both subareas have peen completed. These plans have been reviewed by representatives of all the City departments and they are in f conformance with the departmental objectives as well as the total organization objectives. Additionally, staff is beginning a preliminary economic review of both initial phases of development. The conceptual and specific plans will be available for your review at the January 28th Study Session. These exhibits will be displayed along with other related exhibits, for review at your convenience, In the forth floor central j conference room all day Monday, January 28th. 1 The policy issues to be considered and addressed by the Agency to provide staff with direction for negotiating the respective DDA's center around the following points or questions: 1. Are the conceptual plans for the subareas as presented by the developers and staff in accordant-m with the Agency's overall policy objectives or the areas in quest on. 2. Are the specific implementation plans for the respective Phese ' I developments in concert with the Agency's specific development objectives for the site. _� �. MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA January 21, 1985 Page 2 i I RECOMMENDATIONS: Following your review of the concept and specific Phase I development plans at your Study Session of the 28th,staff would recommend your concurrence in authorizing detailed development negotiations to begin around the parameters of those plans. l Respe sub tte , W. Th m n i City Administrator I CWT/DLB:Ip 03t6H { I � 4 I 5 - u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF REDEVELOPMENT April 23, 1984 Dear Project Area Commtittee Member: i I As you are probably aware, a great deal of progress has been made during the past several weeks toward implementing the Downtcx%m Redevelopment Plan. The Coastal Commission has approved the Downtown Specific Plan, and the City Council adopted the Downtown Redevelopment Implementation Strategy. As part of this strategy, and ccrisistent with Redevelopment Law, the Project Area Committee is required to review and make recomnendations to the Redevelopment Agency on the Agency's relocatioxi and replacement housing plans. I have enclosed the Housing Opportunities and Relocation Element which reflects the Agency's commitment toward meeting its housing obligations, for your review. To provide an opportunity for you to share your views on this dommient, we are asking that you attend a meetirig sdieduled for: f i i I.16dnesday, PIay 2, 19B4 7.00 P.M. room F3-8, Lower Level 1 Huntington Beach Civic .'tan*er 200014,in Street If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at 536-5502. I look forward to seeing you there. Sincerely, Tom Tindier Redevelopment Coordinator Tr:lp Enclosures: Agenda for Meeting of 5/2/64 Housing Opportunities and Relocation Element Telephone(714)536.5582 III . r. REQUEST '�'R REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AC'"ON RH 84-13 • Date April 69 1984 Submittedto: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive,Officer om Tincher, Redevelopment Coordinator Prepared by� Subject:* DOwNT3WN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ! ,I 'i Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachrrients: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to established Agency policy and previous direction given to promote the goals and objectives of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Plan, staff has prepared a comprehensive Downtown Implementation Strategy which reflects the first steps which need to be taken in implementing this important program. The Agency's adoption of this Report and accompanying documents will go a long way toward realizing significant, new development at an early date within the Downtown Area. RECOMMENDED ACTIONI �� Approve Downtown Implementation Strategy. d,.S(_ f✓1,19--2.• Authorize transmittal of Housing Opportunities and Relocation Element 5,o_1 MAW'" to Main-Pier Project Area Committee for its report and recommendations. /! Approve Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Mola Development Corporation for Town Square Phase I Project. Talbert-Beach Industrial Site Disposition and 4. Adopt PP T t approach to aloe �• Development Agreement. in of the circulation element I � 5. Authorize staff to initiate the processing y amendments, as required, to implement th owntown Circulation Plan. ANALYSIS: After� man ears of planning, thousands of dollars in costs and perhaps hundreds of thousands of hours in time devoted by City officials, downtown property owners and the community at large, we are now at the long awaited point in time when the redevelopment of the City's downtown area still commence. Bringing the overall process to this point, has represented a significant challenge to the community and its ultimate success or failure to a great extent, will be predicted by the actions taken and commitments made by the City Council during this very crucial phase of the program. Even through all of this effort over the years, the basic economic, environmental and physical contraints still exist, and can only be overcome through a collective and cooperative effort. between the City- and the affected property owners. However, there are added dimensions which now exist that were not present in the past. These are 1) the fact that a specific plan has been approved and 2) through the redevelopment program, public resources can be used to assist in ivercoming the constraints and to Pin.mr RH 84-13 April 6, 1984 Page 2 stimulate and reinforce private sector investment. Without a definite and deliberate. program to implement the o plan and an aggressive use of the resource, which the City/Redevelopment Agency has to stimulate and support private sector interest, the program will never meet the expectations of those who have given so much of their time and effort in promoting and encoura!iing its success. li The 4]ovntown Implementation Strategy Report, which is attached, reflects f an initial effort to set forth specific actit,ns and/or activities, which, II when approved or authorized, will allow staff to move forward in an effort to implement the program which is now in place. The Report itself is supplemented by specific documents which you are being asked to review and act upon as a means to carry out certain recommended actions. These documents are included as Attachments. (See Below). FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment Contractual Services funds for necessary appraisals. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve selected actions and activities, and amend or continue others. ATTACHMENTS: DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY - Exhibit 1 . Housing Opportunities and Relocation Element Exhibit 2. Town Square Phase I Negotiation Agreement Exhibit 3. Talbert-Beach Industrial Site Disposition and Development Alternatives Exhibit 4. Downtown Circulation Plan i CWT/TT:lp Attachments E i ....... .J. ... .r. .... -.'. ., . . •. � • ,. . .. _ +., .' . .. .,. .... ...•„•vc..r.u....-..ra✓rr.. .'r.,.1r�:aGLTii:�T`�:i3:.Y•'ila;:..a.%r.1.}T III • A i DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ` I r, I. � e.^wa:�...-...r....... ..........�..... v:.U... t. .. -_ . .. r� ,. - . .'.r:. ...,.. .. . _...... ....... �...........w�:.�• .::.c.ix•.•...f<'4c. .dKfJl{ill 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4. Pa�c e I. Introduction 1 i II. Overall Pro3ect 1 i • III. Town Square Subarea 3 i 1 IV. Downtown Core Subarea 3 V. Main-Pier Subarea 4 VI. Huntington-Lake Subarea 4 V11. Beach-City Subarea 5 i VIII. Atlanta-Beach Subarea 5 I f Exhibits i 1 Housing Opportunities b Relocation Element 2 Town Square Phase I Negotiation Agreement 3 Talbert-Beach Industrial Park Disposition and Development Alternatives i 4 Downtown Circulation Plan t ^'Y..Y"nR 4...+1.:::w... : . . � .,. a . ... ..... .l - . 1 .I1 'r . . ...r'.a..f.:s.,. .'_ .f... i � 'f•LIF!.�t�..ia+: ..jf/�• P • f 1 DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ITo promote the involvement of existing -property�p per y owners in assessment of development opportunities, the Downtown Redevelopment Area has been divided into seven subareas as depicted on the map which follows. The delineation of these areas was based upon land use and development considerations and, it is felt, are logical boundaries from which 4.0 solicit active and ongoing owner participation in redevelopment efforts. In promoting such involvement , staff has initiated meetings with property owners from most of the subareas within recent weeks and days. These meetings and previous expressions of interest on the part of a large number of property owners over time have led to a basic conclusion that most owners want to see redevelopment take place, and they will support the City in a cooperative effort if they are treated fairly and the economic realities allow redevelopment to occur. To provide direction in -,:his cooperative effort and to authorize staff to 1 proceed with several interrelated efforts, specific actionE and activities are being proposed for each -subarea as well as the overall program. Your approval of this report and the accompanying documents will reflect a � major step toward assuring the successful implementation of the Downtown Redevelopment Program. OVERALL PROGRAM 1. Authorize staff to transmit the Housing Opportunities and Relocation Element to the Main-Pier Project Area Connittee for their review and recoixnendations. Authorize staff to immediately initiate the formal process to consider an amendment to the circulation element, making it consistent with the proposed Downtown Circulation Plan.'' Authorize staff to coarrence immediately with the consolidation of all the f existing redevelopment areas into one overall redevelopment project. r,sl Such an effort will reduce administrative costs and improve the Agency's ability to meet its replacement housing, relocation assistance, and �'• � affordable housing obligations. 4. Authorize staff to continue discussions with the City School District in rr�? are effort to assess the need fnr, and determine the feasibility of, the : r; Agency assisting the School District in Obtaining needed industrial storage space (possibly within Terry Park Industrial Site) in response to their request for assistance during the fiscal review process. ; . Authorize staff to proceed immediately with finalizing the agreement with �.l the Huntington Beach Company which would lead to the City obtaining fee title to the vacated Southern Pacific right-of-way. - .ary'..l..f•�.war..........wa'n.'t7.{1 T {�. I r t ' r • 1� or , I Chi � c .j ca {tcn / m w �r�, fir• ..�1 {� 12% �' I c LAJ �. • , Z !lr LV QD 1 -,11._ J1 Ji_.JI ._ iI . y 1.� _ + IL] Cj L ...... C � 1 IElF] L-DO E-] -ILL ��11�CY:JC.:JC�JC aCS � NN I ,i _. .r O� 7 _ Approve "the overall development concept for � the subarea and direct development initiate discussions with property owners and �J d nt interests. 2 Authorize staff to work with the Town Square Phase II property owners and other property owners throughout the subarea in an effort to incorporate �ti J Z appropriate parcels into the Phase I development program. A' Approve the Town Square Phase I Negotiation Agreement with Mola 71JAi i� Pu\thorize eloprnent Corporation. 4 staff to work with Mr. Vanderheyden and adjoining property m t owners including Mr. Niccole and Mr. Traner in an effort to promote the consolidation of the site as depicted on the Subarea Map. Mr. Niccole's property will probably need to be acquired to accommodate the realignment of lake Street. S. Work with Mr. Niccole and assess the possibility of trading his downtown J1.,,1 holdings to the Agency in return for his participation in the Talbert-Beach Industrial Project. 6.• Work with Natalie Kotsch, Caltrans, Mr. Cavic, and other auto dealerships within the downtown area to assess the feasibility of possibly trading Caltrans out of their Beach-Yorktown location into the Gothard Industrial Area (possibly the heliport site on Talbert-Beach Site). This would allow their existing site to be used for relocation purposes and their storage operation shifted to the industrial area, where it more appropriately belongs. 7. Authorize staff to assess the need and the feasibility of the Agency acquiring the vacant Southern California Edison building as a relocation resource and possible future Community Services Center. DOWNTOWN CORE SUBAREA I. Authorize staff to continue to work with existing property owners to assess development interest and opportunities. 2 Authorize staff to meet with Petrofina and the Independent Oil Operators Association to discuss possibilities and timing to bring about consolidation activities in the subarea. 3.�lipprove overall development concept and authorize staff to initiate the R appropriate public review of the proposed circulation. ` 7 4 Authorize staff to develop a more detailed concept of the proposed Transportation Center and assess the feasibility of financing and -3- developing such a facility. C' 5. Authorize staff to work with the Community Clinic to assess future needs and relocation alternatives. 6. Authorize staff to assist the owners of buildings which do not meet seismic safety requirements it; developing plans in response to the ordinance requirements.- ; 7. Authorize staff to prepare conceptual drawings of potential development i \, opportunities within the subarea to stimulate property owner interest and involvement. MAIN-PIER SUBAREA 1. Approve the overall development concept for the subarea and direct Redevelopment staff to prepare a "Request for Qualifications" and 1 formally solicit and assess ddvelopment interest in the area. Said RFQ's will be evaluated on the. basis of a) the ability of the developer to respond to existing property owner interest, b) previous development experience, c) -financial capacity, and d) hotel interest. 02: Authorize staff to continue to explore ideas for the development of the Public Interest Center and assess alternative means of financing the construction and ongoing operation of such a facility. 3. Authorize staff to explore with Caltrans the possibility of constructing an underpass to connect Main Street and the pier. r4.1 Authorize staff to pursue with HUD the idea of using Job Bill funds to 4 �.J relocate the 5th Street - Pacific Coast Highway traffic signal to 6th Street and making interim improvements to Mzin Street at Pacific Coast Highway to accommodate a reversal of the one-way street if the Main Street closure is approved between Main and 5th. , HUNTINGTON-LAKE SUBAREA 01. Authorize staff to continue to work with the Huntington Beach Company to assess development interest and opportunities for the subarea. ti 2: Authorize staff to work with the Huntington Beach Company and Petrofina to assess the feasibility of incorporating a site within the subarea for the consolidation of ail drilling operations. 3. Authorize staff to work with the Huntington Beach Company and the Huntington Shores Mobile Home Park residents to develop a mobile home shelter park in the City to accommodate the residents' replacement housing needs. -a- ,z MIL . 1 I 2 BEACH-CITY SUBAREA r Recognizi0g the fact that on)y very limited new development is likely to occur in this subarea, unless an acceptable alternative mobile home park is provided and/or other appropriate housing accommodations are agreed upon by the existing residents, authorize staff to evaluate , the feasibility of responding to this need as part of the Agency's required Replacement Housing Plan, 2. Authorize staff to work with The Robert Mayer Corporation and the existing mobile home residents to assess development and relocation possibilities for the subarea. ATLANTA-BEACH SUBAREA 1, Authorize staff to work with the shopping center owners to establish an acceptable realignment for the frontage road and an overall upgrading of the center. 2: Authorize staff to assess the need . for, and feasibility of, the Agency participating in the upgrading of flood control channels adjacent to this f : subarea in response to the County's request which occurred during the fiscal review proceedings. t r 1• 1 r�. a. t I • REQUEST RJR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACIiON RCA 83-16 Date Agri 1 S. 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and Redevelopment Agency �Y G1IlY lr UZyC11• Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive 0 Prepared by: Office of Business and Industrial Enter . 1�Y Subject: APPROVAL OF LOAN FROM CITY TO SUPPORT AC I S THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPI4ENT SURVEY AREA --� i Statement of Issue, Recommen&tion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Action:,Attachments:.; STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The blufftop landscaped area is a necessary and vital improvement to the imple- mentation of an effective redevelopment program within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Survey Area. It is recognized that the City has very limited resources available to finance this important improvement and, therefore, it is clear that the Rede- velopment Agency can play an important role in carrying out this project. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the loan of City funds in the amount of $50,O00 to the Redevelopment Agency at 10 percent A.P.R. with repayment occurring with future tax increment funds. ANALYSIS: With the implementation of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area, it is anti.. cipated that, in the very near future, the Redevelopment Agency will generate re•enues from the construction which is likely to occur within the boundaries of the project. Portions of these revenues generated from the future development can and should be used to repay the City for any loans which might be made today to the Agency in order that the program can be expedited. The funding source proposed for this activity, in fact, are revenues that have been 'generated as a result of Community and Neighborhood Enhancement activities already underway, FUNDING SOURCE: Proceeds of Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Issue• ($50,000). CWT:TT:jb ri,p vni p r..+ ..r•yyr........ ,.-t.a ...;µ'... .. .. _.. .'. .. .• ......�......«.....w. ......,._...,+.F...1:w.0f 41nUvn•t.«r.•w.....,......r�,. I . t i �' CITY CQUNCI�ACT'IQN RCA 83-15 REQUES . FOR Date April 8, 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �,�... ;oursat�. Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator ►�ripV 'v 8Y Gt�Y -� r J g 19,�"; Prepared by: Office of Business and Industrial Enterpri Subject: CITY LOAN TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR MAIN- ,. . oiTY C' R PROJECT AREA ACTIVITIES .� _ Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attechrmnts:QP. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: y Loan the R_A development Agency the proceeds from the Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program ($50,000) to provide additional financing for constvuction of Phase I of the blufftop landscaped area. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize that a loan of $50,000 be made to the Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of supporting redevelopment within the blufftop subarea within `he Main.-Pier rede- velopment survey area. ANALYSIS: The Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program will be generating revenues from the successful implementation of various programs and projects. These activities will result in a cash flow to the City which could be used for either general fund purposes or designated for support of various component.. 1f the Community and Neigh- borhood Enhancement effort. An example of- this situation has recently occurred through the successful issuance of Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds by the City. In support of this issue, a $501000 payment was received by the City pursuant to terms of the mortgage revenue financing effort. It is proposed that these funds be advanced to the Redevelopment Agency in the form of a loan so that the Redevelop- ment Agency might utilize these funds to support other redevelopment project .activi- ti es. In light of the need to provide sufficient funds to implement a minimum lev,41 of development as part of the blufftop landscaping program, it is suggested thiit the Agency use this $50,000 to help support the blufftop landscaping activity. Through this approach we establish an an role of the Redevelopment Agency i►: fund- ing such needed public improvements is support the overall Main-Pier Redevelopment Project as well as establish a vehicle whereby, through tax increment funds, the City will be reimbursed at some time in the future for the loan made to the Agency in support of this project. With the adoption of the amendment to the Main-Pier Redevelopment Plan, whir:h 1 includes the frontage a I ag long PCH between Gth Street and Goldenwest, the entire blufftop landscaped area could by completed at an early date. I FUNDING SOURCE: Proceeds of Single-Family Mortgage Revenue Bona Issue ($50,000). CWT:TT:jb r� • REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL. ,ACTION • Date February 3, 1983 Scbmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members At'P OVkD By CITY' COUNCIL Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Office of Business and Indust►•ial Enterprise "�' WJr' i! Subjact: PROPERTY EXCHANGE TO ACQUIRE SITE WITHIN THE MAIN PIER AMENDMENT' NO. 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; D Statement of Issue, Rerommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actro ac ments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: As we move forward with implementing the downtown development.program, we must insure a proper transition between the commercial core and the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The proposed acquisition and property trade which follows will allow the City to insure that such a proper transition zone is established. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the acquisition and property exchange, authorize the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Clerk and Mayor to draft and execute the appropriate documents so that the conveyance of property can. occur, and authorize the expenditure of necessary Hnusing and Community Development Block Grant funds as indicated in the "Funding" 'section' of this R.C.A. In addition, authorize staff to p►viceed imme- diately to establish a deveiopirtzn. program for the Lake Street site. ANALYSIS: On July b, 1982, the City Council declared the Old Public Works Yard site surplus property and authorized staff to solicit bids for the sale of said site. A mini- mum bid was established and there were no responses to the request for bids. During recent weeks it came to our attention that Lindborg/Dahl Investors, Inc. was proceeding with plans to construct single-family housing units on Lake Street between the old and new fire station properties. This area is within the proposed Main-Pier Amendment No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area and is slated for a mixed commercial/residential use within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan. Staff feels the proposed single-family development would not be consistent with the City's current downtown planning. In light of this concern and the status of the Old Public Works Yard site, staff ' initiated discussions with Lindborg/Dahl to pursue the possibility of undertaking a land trade which would lead to the development of the Old Public Works Yard t site and preserve the Lake Street site for a more compatible development. Lindborg/Dahl has now agreed to such a trade having the following terms: I. The trade is based on an assumption of equal value for developable lots. This assumption is confirmed by existing appraisals which we have for the Old Public Works Yard site and the Old Fire Station site. �1 rro suet 1 yY✓...i'.r-i r.. ... . .... .. .. 1. ...., _ .. 1 ....... ..........+... a -rvMW..wr.:�✓L{)V 4K1.:"A Lw:L""::wir''l RCA - Property Exchange n ' February 3, 1983 Page Two However, in order to provide developable lots at the Old Fire Station site, a resubdivision of the site must take place. This would be done by the City and result in the establishment of nine (9) 30 foot parcels. 2. The City would compensate Lindborg/Dahl for the expenses which they have incurred in preparing the Lake Street site for development. 3. The City would assume the $450,000 mortgage and loan fee: which are now due on the Lake Street site, with Lindborg/Dahl paying forwarding fee, reconveyance fee and previous accumulated interest and the City paying any additional interest from the date the Council approves the proposal . 4. The City would clear the Old Public Works Yard site. Based on the costs and property values involved, it has been determined that an equitable trade would result in Lindborg/Dahl gaining clear title to the nine: (9) new lots within the Old Public Works Yard site as compensation for the costs which they have incurred and their equity in the Lake Street site, In addition, Lindborg/Dahl would agree to secure an option to acquire at a new appraised price, not to exceed $65,000 per lot, the three (3) remaining lots within the Old Public Works Yard site from the City within two years from the date the initial lots are conveyed. The following table depicts a comparison of costs and values. Value of Lake S�reet Property $ 975,000 (15 lots X $65,1)00/lot) Less loan on property 458,000 Lindborg/Dahl eq,sity plus costs incurred $ 517,000 (fees, dirt, plans, etc.) 42,370 fees 3,400 dirt 28,000 plans 14LO88 misc. TOTAL $ 604,858 Value of 9 lots within Old Public Works $ 585,000 Yard site (9 lots X $65,000/lot) As you can see, Lindborg/Dahl would receive property having comparable value to that which they would convey to the City, plus be compensated for most of the expenses which they have incurred. Of significant benefit to the City is the fact that we would not only receive fair market value for the Old Public Works Yard site and see that site developed, but we would also enhance the future value of the old railroad right-of-way which we hope to see under City ownership some time in the near future. In addition, the site would be preserved for a use which is more consistent with our Down- town development goals. Attachid for your review are maps of both sites, a photo of a use which could form the boundaries of our "new" downtown and a map depicting the proposed loca- tion of this type of transition use between the commercial core and the surround- ing residential neighborhoods. t} .......: �. .,:,; .. . . ..: .- ....... .. ... _ .. . ., ., ._,.._.« r...,.. ... ._..... .a.{.., •..4..na.wc.tu:..+.:,w'z-.l�tal.t:Fs 1 1 FUNDING SOURCE: Housing and Community Development Block funds: l Downtown $ 300,000 Local Option 150,000 Lake Street Fire Station 51000 455,000 ALTERNATIVES: jDo not carry out acquisition and exchange and allow single-family holaes to be constructed on the site. CWT:TT:jb i i } . .._. .. .- .. .....'I.... .. ....•K,r.V..11�.er..r__aw�+..+r..r..ay...:sMa QA:.�j,\'1 mot` �rc1.:r.� •.;vim ' ilaE •ASSESSMENT POR. N//2,S//2,SEC.//,T.6S,R.// W ' I t / J i tG /♦•=/00' W � (tJ I 2 � { Q L. HUN BtJ:I'D. P.E. 11 R.R. R/i4') f (-,9,Cit O FE a (3 RR R/. ti•xV4C T/NGTON ! •- r 604 /.4/7ACRCS Q 200 Z` .JF♦' ' ♦rqn s LAKE STREE lS ♦: 1 .. ti. is ,S. `J. _ 25 opell q 20. 23 2 t 915%3 4 5 ` _" 2 19 �3i ► ' o '� - > > ja 36 34 .32 30 28 116 1411101 B 6 z V_ 38 36 zs za 2 14 10 s ' 20 s fol 30 c aq 10 ' ! r r r , — `r -;s.. ., < T - -s t .. r C�. ' - r. 'ram-�r � ' t'r •r .,s' a ems• .il.• �Q 'sa:' i•i ?♦•' n VAI err S j pF j'T ��� -� . t �r / �� � � � �, � u ?�'0 �.: •f i ; . . .�;/�� • .� �� i { i r f f r �_ . rr: f, i t i� 1 4 r �� I I smar * 60' sr' 6r sz• s'r• s�• 60 WA t •M w /s D • � T . I 4 S/0 9 B 5 4 3 P !n• /"1 a 1402 32 9 /.� 04 /4 29 co- 4 /6 W,18 `--�-- tj U f 5 17 is -tt /2 /3 -/4 5 /6 / /B 19 ZO C k� 0 .r try/ 22 � itr �"'� ,``fit-• Y , i . ' s• STREET $ • �F �� J '° J i J A ff j r w 41 I I q DO 1 � 4 / r` u C /2 // /0 9 B E 5 4 3 !� K% TSONS A00. •~B !' , ao Ij•Jpr'n,�30rF7 � t 2a- 05 ' NOTE -• ASSESSOR'S BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEY. NUMBERS BOOK 25 PAGE' 04 SHOWN 1N CIRCLES COUNTY of, oRANGfi* , r 1 • ....,..w w:-...iJ.r.. ...•..�.:.i:►rr.w...i.�i.L':wMyN'N••.•.W�yh...L�•.k•. . + .. t� ..wr.�'rR.-•+w.�w..•. .L•w..r%Zw L.►►.�.J�J.w..l:�:�1 M• �*• t .,s�i:./ �`�a ,•'f•CMS; �� 1 :p' � t�.•/.ti�• f} r CIp - 11 Xl .YY1 ILI 1 y17� 1 1 rllr: ,. . Th'ANS�7/ON A�69 "i _ . A V£ 1 .'tip• /;, • 1 d4 Ail E: .I 1._« �_ -_i-1 -.� � ••��U'�(`/'f,� . /� f .n 'r � .�• J 711I 1 14. f , -, •«, •r.�., .� r /•v 1. f .. .. —• -1 �I TTi— ri F., f .121 Z �- {�•^� 12U L 233f, 2tnG 1 '{ ti ,tLi AVE � VIP LNUT Tu- I.J�ll If: i ��;'� �so, ;ij '}j {r rn f � " n i.•.,1..,1..• � 1 'Y� � OCEAN -..._.--_�..._...--•....w �.•.v .. .. -r.... •.ry .• i. .. .• ...__. _..._r ...-_..._. • ..1 ....•y.•. .••✓.r.._•... _._..- .,,�N.}:HI!YYY•' ' I REQUFU FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION �,,,,A.-I't �yGly 1, Date November Q Submhtad to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submittedby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra o � c�.�,c it m Prepared by: 9ffice of Business and Industrial Enterprise drt Subject: RESOLUTION A14ENDING DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AND DIRECTING PLANNING COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH BOUNDARIES AND PREPARE PRELIMINARY '• PLAN FOR EXPANDING MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA j Statement of luue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attechments:IOL/ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: i7 i In that the plan preparation and adoption process takes approximately seven to eight months to be completed, it is suggested that we move ahead at this time in initiating the next phase of ,the potential redevelopment program for the downtown area. Rather than establish the projects for the remaining sites within the downtown survey area as delineated on Exhibit "A", it is suggested that the exist- ing Main-Pier Project Area simply be expanded to include these sites, In addition, it appears that the site south of the shopping center on Beach Boulevard and Atlanta has a potential to accommodate an affordable rental housing project, it would be very desirable,'to incorporate this site into an expanded Main-Pier Project Area as it could serve to help meet the anticipated relocation and affordable housing obligations which we and the developers will have. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached resolution. i t YSIS: Because of the time involved in establishing or expanding a redevelopment project, it is requested that we move ahead now and undertake the first steps in establish- ing thel loverall project. It is felt that there is considerable potential for promoting major investments throughout these areas if a redevelopment program can be put in place in a timely manner. Likewise, by amending the Main-Pier Redevelop- ment Project Area rather than establishing separate programs, a substantial bene- fit can accrue to the Agency because of the savings in administrative costs as well as greater simplicity in the financing program for the overall area. FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVES: Not to proceed with the expansion of the project area at this time and simply implement a program within the existing Main-Pier Redevelopment boundaries. ATTACHMENT: Resolution � CWT:TT:jb O 4/91 I r"1 RESOLUTION NO. 5189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 5090 AND DIRECTING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION TO SELECT FROM THE AMENDED SURVEY AREA THE BOUNDARIES FOR AN . AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND TO FORMULATE A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOP- MENT OF AMENDED PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach designated a Redevelopment Survey Area pursuant to Resolution No. 5090 for study purposes to determine the feasibility of imple- menting a redevelopment project within said areas as shown on Exhibits "A" and '-B"; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, as part of the Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program, desires to amend said Survey Area by adding property as delineated on Exhibit "B" and that said area, as amended, be studied to determine if redevelopment projects in said area, as amended, are pre-ticatle; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Council to initiate redevelopment projects in the existing Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area and amended survey area where it is found feasible to do so; and WHEREAS, California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code sections 33000 et. se�C. ) provides that a redevelopment survey area may be desig- nated by resolution of the City Council; and l 1 WHEREAS, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has reviewed said existing I survey area and amended area and has concluded that the implementation of a re- development project within said areas is feasible; and WHEREAS: Section 33322 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that, as directed by the City Council , the Planning Commission shall select a Redevelop- ment Project Area comprised of all or part of the Redevelopment Survey Area; and WHEREAS, it is hereby det►.rmined that a Redevelopment Project within the, before mentioned amended Survey Area is in the best interest of the Citv of Huntington Beach and should, therefore, be established; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Survey Area shown on Exhibit "A" is hereby amended to include 1 the area shown on Exhibit "B", both of which are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby di►•ecu. the Huntington Beach Planning Commmission, in cooperation with the. Huntington Reach Redevelopment Agency, to amend the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area by selectin(9 the boundaries for an expanded area from within the Survey Areas as delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B". i Section 3. The City Council of the City of Huntington death fu►•the►• dirw_, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission, in cooperation with the Huntington Bea.li i Redevelopment Agency, to formulate a Preliminary Plan for the amendment of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, and to submit said Preliminary Plan to said Agency for purposes of facilitating the preparation of an official amendment to the Rede- velopment Plan for the proposed project. Section A. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ath day of .- November �, 1982. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor -2- t` n � —� APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: GAIT, HUTTON By //&7 C t At ne STITAOLING, YOCCS, CARLSMLuPAUTH Acting City Attor ey Special Redevelopment Counsel Robert C. Songster INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED: Director, Buslness and Industr-51City Administrator Enterprise +ti I 11M ^3- i t.• r x� E9E9EN l�rrs, [o a]a]Ns, ��■��o'n■f i�rf�■i s arf�_. w� _� �e i�i�e i s i s a i • - MA�iv-pE2 Ph'OJECT A�2E/� DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA OOM • BEACI OULEVARD CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMEM SURVEY AREA EXHIBIT IIf7i1 : : SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 13-6-11 --�"��-=- •:O*[ CITY 0.1 • C• , CPo-Cq O•„••-Cl q )st r 1••..r•r tt•.,t/m +—'"ut Stf_`? CFD ft., n•H• HUMPING�II / 1 1C/ ��ij'�111'\ �j "1 �A\ . •,r q•r L+.)«,H.•w .«.•.n&—tv J4..l:.�1� �. rN V• J. V 1 '� .1J� I .l C 1 /...., /rrfor , .•..., I0Y g�� .Mn•... ...... • r�.r,•f ,f7 .40. t, t fi w••wr•Y••Y.M-,n•••• ORANGE COUNTY# AMENDED DY ;ONE LASE: 1.8 t• wo, v•t •, t/•! Lt! t/..•,. ..� .. ..... Its.111.J)f t)).)•O.MO.')0.•0..•LJ.•41.1.•{•,N•)1.{f so.0.44 a•,r..1a{.•f.•+,/. 11M /0 ,+l)�••••• r•{) V•• •. Is.-] uN,l ..�.hr•1.-/ M••Ir {•).• ,ntJ • t. X•'1 INr•••••••..•Ir H:«••r.•,•rr pop 'If b.l1f'[;r/if•p•J. ,N,{ 1.1 toso I ' nv c riilf'tY�W _ w A ••ivy R! • ,p w .,^'^•'�'�• .. j R3/��{1 ��..._."�" , / ! RI t. RI 0I �I R! `tir R] }'# R3 II R3 R! RI RI • V1 jw ww+;w_Sr -•w/y �� r� RI IRI RI' RI ` ' C4 .,••�"] a ..R] ) /+J R 2 rl f• �� RI Rf r. R. R] Y -.or ""•. ""'ate 43 ■ tan a/ �Is?rgj RI R2 Al At pt •, w R! �l R! a2 A R] _ q] ' i RI �.� . L_ RI_ RA RI t R1 1 Bt 111 RI CF—R ON BMW W ' 1 t � r 4 Is Q0 MI-A-O ' C�„ t;". -""tt••rrtrJ-+l,IJI a r... apl. A RA-0 s-w t i=-1 MH •Ir 1.1 w•• we 1f. 1 . •i .I J •4 M2-0 pACIrIC OCEAN •`f�r •r'rr•�.�,:r.C.,....`�r• ^ r f. •h. .♦ ��...•t1r���4r�.`.�`AT� ••�• "�•,.•„*'t�,• 1.�4/7 C..-...r�1"�..S.t,.'r!.'1.1�'r�!1�•J�'�1�'.:- ....;r��:r� ."«��r�•G - • r ' I Os: 1 too,,) Res. No. 5189 r` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 1 I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of e C Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven-, members of the City y H that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November 1982� by the following; vote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey, Ke11y NOES: Councilmen: Thomas, Mandic a _ - ABSENT: Councilmen: Pattinson City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California i i . . .,. .. .. �:r...:C.`FI•.+...1:a:ai•{�':e+�;tv'r��Y/�.�1�ii:�r+J r /► �� Jt Y ,i•y C 0 /r FOR CIl : 0`0JNCICACTION A Date November 4, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City C7urci i ro�NGtti Y Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrf� �.r,�kO�E°�Y Gl� �1►.� Prepared by: 'Office of Business and Inc:ustrial Enterprise Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT PROPOSP.LS FOR ARCHIT CTURA!. SERVICES RELATED TO THE MAIN•PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attaehmer. C"I(;,. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Now that we have initiated discussions with property miners within the Mafn-Pie Redevelopment Project and potential developers for the area, it has become ciea that there is a need to proceed immediately with a more detailed assessment :, specific development which might occur. In order to undertake this effort, mr; seeking your authorization to solicit proposals for architectural services. Sr. feel that by bringing aboard the technical, expertise that a broad based, experiel. ed firm could bring will allow us to establish a very practical approach for formali- zing development proposals as well as in assessing the feasibility of the neces- sary public L;::.:jrmitments which will be required in the area. '7lmese commitments might include the upgrading of the existing pier, the expansion of public park- ing facilities, and the potential to provide some beach-oriented commercial space in a timely manner in order to accommodate potential relocatirm needs. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to solicit proposals for architectural services related to the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. ANALYSIS: Since the solicitation of proposals from architectural firms, the assessment of their capabilities, and the selection process.will take a considerable amount of time to accomplish, we are seeking authorization at this time to allow us to pro- ceed with these tasks in a timely manner. This action, will allow us to be in a position to move ahead immediately with the preparation of more detailed plans and design activities once the coastal land use plan is adopted and prior to the Council action on the Specific Plan. It has become apparent to us that a need exists to have the services available of a professional architectural firm to allow us to assess various development options which we might want to pursue as well as to establish an overall development theme for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. This can be critical to the future redevelopment of the area in that the product will provide potential investors with a clear picture as to what the over- all scope of the program miii'l be and the type of anticipated investments that are proposed to occur under this important City effort. P10 4131 r I r.r. tr4'Mr. t Superior Court a►THE STATE.OF CAI.IFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK t�lttNt)' tF t�lill[.tt•1•rut!v PUBr_IC HEARING titate of l'alifornia 1 �_ County of Orange I` APR I L L. ELLI ITT That I am and at all timer ht grin mentioned war it citirrn of 1lia0Rh u•+ i r. 5, the United titat".over the age of twenty-o �r one ar.,and that 1 Mol"Is W cis �Cp��rar/d�/�pt�� r am not a party fit.floor inirrrmed in the nlrwr entttird matter; Ir�M itis ewwtlwEraeafltirtia�lflM ~ that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REV. w��' fir itltarlA a> tw+ t '� ■;rewspaper of lteneral rirrulalion,published in the Citv o' lFM lrlaiMs�4 tM A�r�wlY��peprr•(M ewe rat '' tr.ie leapaaes aaMr HUNTINGTON BEACH R n�rt ofAwet r ar lia'rwiirt '. . ` County ofti Orange io and which newspaper is agenere: for the isrisAee.iat y ant irit!M� " d'tr:minatioit of lncsl news and intellil;enre of a general charar• •Gtsaifstlaaaathet'Yararlth+ altla ter,and wl•irh newspaper at all times herein mentioned had L f limaw ropeu!p��aa,,,^; i' •�; and still has•firma Hewteseriptinn list of payintc sulscril,rn, tieNww art tMlrwr t M/raleat tM aim of at lviraeitpa�w} and which newspaper has peen ntahliahed. printed and pub- At 1 � ad+ lished et regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a . wyMytyrrt�.t> slaa�atl'�r,Y�rtat�tl��itr�l�► , period eteeedlntt une year, that the notice, of which the st►gpwbdm do A powtlr.CswriMir �t annesed is a printed copy,has limn published in the rrgular o s how M s and entire issue of said ttrwspalxr,and not in anv supplement ��� � ea tie therrof,on the toMrwing dates,to wit. 1 p * ��� n" w�' d wprWYet M thaw"tei ki aM{M• M1r MtMAy tMd ahreseM h�tYs)'sari slab r}rfh�wr aei rtw air d wiNNl sri w,sl AUG. 12 a 19 s 269 SEP. 2+ 1982 ,lM to tin )AnM Mata+l attasi tr�lallstja/t sewr"ie�ina j1�abas�ttYl wMpMepd*710011aob ir-In a r�ff�rt d 1Mopow.bow"of OUaMar d ,. at! qua Ai..hwi b �a �dtttarelarlwdaf twit lltiww ►� dog ,i�ta��'�ldiit• � "A Now �P . es,u aM: 1 certify fur declare)under penalty of perjury tn,.t the forryru 1J�AL t ti r n ing is true and carree•t. 'ildpgtift d vosll if r ►a as GARDEN GROVE .pe ��Ps�s�+ '�+ �~" *i'�: Dated at................................ Caa�rd.it6lrinA/saar-di= (Fod yl .... ...... M tM esst�tlaa Mersaarlr eitaera dot skss r Oear Awe saA r w 21rat wtr----a Califot.-ia.this..r d...day of. E P....19....2... is oft.Ylwr wMr tM ��rrar Ysdr dthe '• t ,. .e— tltlsah ItYssa. ri11YrMWi at Mist�I ii�t�lt�lfr' 1t . f4 .a►ttwa.bensbaasa�rat00"W nalfa.e1ttt aalttha»...rlar• f1wD �tw 1t'tf Beat t+li1 Art saes w lan W srelewi r wr ' .Signature ft �lTliblAwtia�psiadii .air bat ur aawkwiwb ear w tit ur of ae irw ' e,..t•dltser lwl�tliwnallr�aditrt: ti�i411(► +tla/r�; NM l in eftit tr►11-M tb o a0srwrswit ad at Mr.�RstMr Lr�.y6 Mdi w1 it b�aaawlMsMiv l wtt laMr�ll�r wttr Is ' asntslart of As eaatbarret—sf bilk Ga•aaC tlwi Meat IM Mat r tha Itiid TWO of Ilt atarsarLsalaft iMill►W LAW U7laartliaMalaA�gsbm d wey►Nst tat at!arts arm easeaal.a sat arellreat No 110,514, moth 41 AV"3W Mr Y+a'Iati 64 saw a has Is fie tYa } / arethoost line of t#/s1A A.waa�helq 40 6M tie >It si sense a a.(on t lroltt bdsr,ifuld I eM At Anew hl itf'_rts f y/v 1h»titd teat 6eaa ttn sadl+tat Ifar of ltrciv C awtlwa't tar of lrsbt Mare/stsli last i r tpeeal 300 JW= ile d t as tM lrs <TrrN/liMl M1at w) i Laetlwr t0AwmWW'itrM41/�E* momgbnd me dtab1Mr How; s �tafd eesa�aaee yr tisat►it*WW it 1r WMt z4 W14007goolp"Ad fAridslLNereeweth . =.�•r .�I .tin1Raifreir Asses pgrAm.allowllow+aaaedoA " UIL OelW NoMMra bane!PAn bpow Area MY or HLIN IM!,BLUR PP Cad.lJtt 14 Arli�CRs1(111i6�2T f Hunt 600di Llera4 Roo.�00tit01012Z rHet.:n s t II r rN TriY Superior Court orrril? ,/�-) STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County lot Orangr CITY OF HUN7ING70N BEACH CITY CLERK JOINT PUBLIC HEARING 5tatr of C�lilornia 1 count of Orange Ire. Lima FOO 1tY y tw M OF A JOINT FV0JC WAWA by?1 a"t0171CtI.W t��tlarrrorruYtrwata�itwcsara►trsurxfelalnffrtcra{.;.,,k APRIL L. ELLIOT T tttMIX&'"MASIX"w ittsPw11AM ��} w+ t+�ae tuootttTrtoFurxt r{.twr.r I�rtia is fi►N tksi w City Caw"of w attr al Ira�ftquti 14wk That!am and at all times herein mrnlirmrd Was a ritirrn of Calclntr*adYr "at'"xts"' Y b�zyvu tML M T 70 t.rr r t4 wwa�rr,,w� i sir Caa+rci i MrrMlr a5 the llnitrd Statra•over the axe ttf turntv•srne year..and that 1 rart•Huw+�etradnr&caYfaai.tllN.slir�1•qr/jiajiiatam not a party to.nor intere.trd in the shove rntitied matter; es���.stit ss� that I am the principal clerk of the printer of a-v sdt7rts"sdtlnrrol"a"I Msi•fYrKnlerrk�rwtCiraTM stYlyWrial p .a.w" tL°rror+'w srw+`i+rat 1r Awr"'FL.rr ptr fart, .en...d Toe wrpa.ar wk Fe+ir�{■tries,A,to HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW t.slur ri."�aarkaaisd&yiksAararysl F�+�ss•shbse■pad abi+ct4veX�warts towgie.4 ja�tat"swps�tilrlwt•■t+.aacrccraar a newspaper of general circulation,publithed in the Vity rtf fatie�aliaw trsr desrw1ara4 - •- p. Ma.!ie rusdrl/+We iaynrsttsaw •sdtsrslit •rdkrerara atarstatMsrtsrr •• , l�. _,. HUNTI NGTON BEACH IR t htai t•` , s.. iaelwiea tsa i.aw imp&%i w tAr srvst•C n•u n9W 110.N W • frwewa►sa ati tAa ti's.ti sad Lk taTei'i N tAr y claw!Ars4r co..rtw ljv County of Orange and which newspaper is published fur the •a/1.; ti '�' " disemin•tion of local newts and intelligener of a general charac• z AN"idea w+l miaMartMgsail apisia +aaw- 1 AN rsidraa and rwtiauMr Amer sand jasitirt tka•dt*ti�w of 1&i Nadtsib}w�•N ter,and which newspaper at all times he-rein mrntioned hid flaw.• , and still his a hMrtu fide sulaKription list of paying sulracriirers, At tk•sbnsti atalid is tssur r�y� say ratl'stt tsarkst say and which new r has hero eaGabliahed.printed and pub. .blectiawatkep+IrssNhe�n+4a+at!'lr awe D�Pe D D tremtwd some •/pv wwr the Aasmr tiad W uM der.nw+6 i4 fished at regular laterals in the said County of Orange far n Frst tsdswlapwlstl'1arslrsrMrtie period exceeding (trip year; that the notice, of *hick the Atas�rewirwRtrerkMeatlrtrin sty fib is aw.-C �•a�';—rj1 ?W 6000 p./or+!M.darrlga,atit rlari arty tMr is.ritiag wrk tw.city CMr! annexed is a printed copy, has fern published in the regular rtsaaas d Lds uijrnia s•s 00 N.tard RMA 1,-raNw rtaa•Am g,e.w.r and retire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement ariaha Ito toIse6w'�'awlk_*Xa*dsoAMrltrrtrn.Mr Its"Atils I tilawasid toes tM G wrcil.i rU gndised�a lies tied pm lwua as arwm VA Witt thereof.on the fntlowingdatnr•towit: sbJstitr•Mr1r p1.v r... 1 ks padiai>rrseal rla■aard LSa.irsra�Ms{ Ma.t ass saes«a lllr tasd a 10 partlir 4r Wom a tb W.f W Dti{stiv=d N�riMrt mod AUG. 12e 199 26r SEP. 2r 1982 ts4r"id'{`'„"pr;"r A°°°bt"'tttt"t�14,ti� poa*Cstrtsrsh9xw ' Ltery prrwsrw ware,bmia....MOM Ia�wriri is i,�,two ��nartt a tA.hart&tiptioa Bala s&*ed y w��I+Awtd wtrsit bile tidcv!w�O�pt tMwl d t'xk�ieiK d lMerwt w raetir "wCtAia riatr isp fmn The ti s1 UM and++ wf4dr :at rlUte�a.&r*14 is ralwiw t.aiALt)rPr'It1P'Tx)UAW .Plot Itimuarman ..:' That petktc of*Aw awk Caw d onw^6uM d CsMrt"a I certify fur declare)under psenaltr of prriury that the-forego• 6601to p .41aw, .gyp it+-xd NspiaU0 fir"Lithe inn is true and trsrrret. &C--"at 0-rmnYN iraaerctmaif Pwfic0aan" ' GA"EN GROVE �� atraa r Oaas Avtssw tisd Flea 6SraN rarrattiwly sa soli artninnd.yc tress I)■tetl.t..... .roar dw C"t"fift tJ Per&Gw H*Vbq shah N Asrsem U'Ate•SM ZIA IM a tAs imeft*tia trick The sarlba"ssuasisw st th wtlwM lies at tam Srrs+eS Wssrt said a+atiwrd nterwaf Sirstti 11 dsr►ssa 7f la N'aN 10 4M to ' California.this.. .. . day of.5e..:..119.. z... ur Ter"Rost d mW porot b«rrt Aatsst twdbarri M d+dttss 71.4=' Frt LAM 1-9 a1ocK sowkask Mx d rrfir C."Ifok"14,4 bweverike / f���• �tk.�atw.iaa d taw ftAI-RK a wl Y b W kq wB Wd ptsriiwa 1tigull 4l �/ tfaw►/1 1U'li`11+cK 638 t�ei wtn ar less ...... �:. .. .�.............. .. IN Ttdr:.ire d tAe r'sri6c0re!�tksratt asn&srasissy f10 fwt r�s n lure•busR ti &Tidy liar w o 4u t+sss uss With and SS two WMAU"Wey aiswQ at f tkt Sitnature ssr4s tea�br.eutiasatarfr sates ssr i416r +d ifria arm a;skr:a w" la!d Has tow-OestkG!Moore tiwstti said W*Kk Mi partim tier barb 41&S� 3••Ir woe 1 rd tot V a Yes wit&w bl/sal rye r4m �{sa)raw ti.awa&wesieelr wad d tM Htncwtpaa 6i+rM MrairMl lire war.`tAxek Ib aarta.:t••r wtN t:s tees aw+t ti..w•w.}sr.Iwt� tn4 and Sb het awti wtafy sceresrsd r�a�tlsaat w.•aak+erwdy: nt*rsraw d tkr aaeti.tat sir ad xtaja tftrrrt; 41 7P id'Yost 100 Get to tie Haft Tide LW*d W rstiek.omw for or�ty of fret sites a in.alw•t u'A Hirk Tiir Lila ie tm aaucbwtmo*ntrsriea duke a xt►"" Gas d Sittk&ewer titanaim+aid niabi m aad atrfleaat Mae of Birth!font &Wk 4t derrsw 3K Ira Cat tau rest won-atrs to tkt klrtrartiws wrab filar am w at 12 d Halsor AsylWe biro 40 fari is is"90 fast emu situ d • tsssarlaa wit pmrt triinr•rstant i"4l 6gre s X IC Yaat WA Kvt i A iae$ltl lest)roar tltr soul►scar err of Purser frisk/y4A ( A },,,r aartkatst kw d N'ti1aa Asr.w Sarti N dcrnr.tl'12'rR�eatill tJit ta►t to rs a.dr ( 'Y �otar is raid isr.mid prior tJr brim we tM suutkaast Yaw dtirrra/afti t wig PD tutu N.idtL 31 W#;Pow ask d orrpriw Beaty aantisaiaR o&*[swirl aotttsetrl CA r.e13e') ems Suutk l0 darter W Of-EaW 411 foes N on ra$hM Yaw d Lake tllrssi:!Aran s��.�arsi�d..otnlrw)use 5auth 11 dretna W ti'.1trc�1 fret a ike 7n+t Mist td tirx city H' City Ateau7 k. .CnI�Adauritntigr•GitydHaatritetrele•rk , •' .. i rase.orkw.Htmtiaritia Heack paalnelaPss•ra AAeary OATM AMUS[119 t CITY Or Hti*fTiWMN SFACH CTtYCI.FAX1iCTIfC'L'ITN:1,1iJi:l7 Puh dvr.IL't!L�Sryt!.Itlpy Haar.tsawt�b'Per.axt9w . 2330 SHIELDS AVE. ` 1G82 LA CRESCENTA,CA.91214 ` `�" t J CITY OF HUNTING T,ON BEACH � CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 1 August 28, 1982 Mayor Robert Mandic City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA Dear Mayor Mandic: I I am a property owner in the downtown area of Huntington Beach. In the past month I have attended two meetings chaired by Mr. Tom Tincher regarding the Pier Redevelop- ment Project. We support, Lhe city in a joint effort of redevelopment. We own seven 25 ' contiguous lots in the affected area between end and 3rd Streets, Our support for .redevelop- ment is historical, but the recent effort by the city sa mms to have the greatest passibility of success of any previously attempted. My husband and I began acqu-firing lots in that first block from thn ocean in 19511 and, by 1964, had accumulated the seven we now ov. n. At that time, we realized the futility of even a 7--lot development, recognizing that the area needed total consolidation. our continuous request has been for a development that allowed owner participation. Wo bought property in the area in order to develop---not to sell, even at a profit. This does not mean we would refuse to sell if, indeed, that was the only way to redevelop. Many of our buildings are "used up" and they will not hold together for many more years. In the past it has been difficult to stand before the City Council and out--shout the strident young people who fear redevelopment. In cese I cannot speakc,directly to the Council on September 7th, I would sincerely appreciate having you share this letter with the Council Members. We sincerely appreciate the openness of the participatory ' process currently underway. '"his process is undoubtedly a reflection of your leadership. Thank you very much. ou svv erV:ti �. Greta S . Pruitt f Owners: 122, 124 3rd Fc. 125, 127 2nd 5t. f'. _....--•••'-•a(:7a wow-- ...+-...•r.. ..... ^.r-�..---..- _ ..._.....� ..r... .... ..... _.... ,. .,.-. ._--._.....»—......�.�::..:YY:.s. ;tu+..+.wor.w.w,.wawass�'�• i l 1 7 J U T At•* \. t611%VVII1; SiS l.U.ttti ul•It1t•:' 11:II�t•; u1t:S'Y IJf.t)S I/iaii(:5 (i5't:\'1`ta. (:.\1.I1UKfIf 90274 } 1 August 26, 1982 1r!o Mayor Robert Mandic r City of Iluntington Beach P.O. Box 190 f Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Duar Mayor Mandic: • f , ! Together with my mother and two brothers, I own the seven lots which comprise the Surf Theatre and adjoining parking lot on 5th Street in " .+- downtown Huntington Beach. Ever since my father acquired this property about 22 years ago, our family has seen our hopes For a re-development of the downtown area result in one disappointment after another. Also, the fact that a '. y porno movie company approached us last year to occupy tha theatre is a sad commentary on their assessment of the type of business and .. :� clientele the dmnitown area is capable of attracting. I have recently attended a few meetings between the downtown property «• ••�M= owners and Mr. Tom Tincher .•Ind his stgff from the city. I am very 4y� grateful that the city of Iluntington Be.•Ich has the services of a � knowledgeable and obviously dedicated employee such as Vr. Tincher. " My family and I are 100% in favor of the adoption of the re-develr�p- ' ment plan which you and the other council membera will be considering, �;>;.•'N and I plan to attend your council meetings- on September 7th and 21st. !Needless to say, as is probably the case with most of our fellow downtown property owners, we have been kept from realizing the potential of our property for many years, and I fear that if the plinn is defeated, re-vitalization of the downtown area will be Abandoned for yet another 'I decade. I would appreciate your sharing these thoughts and the !support of my entire family (and perhaps this letter) with the other members of the city council. Sincerely, rp -. lie Greene _ CITY OF HUNT N37 ON BEACH CITY COUNCIL OFFICE �•_�•".-;:.T,M,,,1S. :�:;j'a":v:r,�. ;:.:.:'...3.;..� ....1f.•a-.._,-:.'f :i� ..... .. _:.T't.y�.:.L'... ..-s,+...�...---. .•..�...--«—.....^+ra+�.�rssts?tY-,,,•�y `,Rll��flrivv�i I.Yew:a1. 3 � I — ,?�yr'�rt""t'':+• ...=.�.tL4.c:�..f /:�// I •,�.`r'r.17�:.i•�^•- aF' j: �rx l Vel ScP 7 1982 c:h r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH w� Y.�G ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ' y5 MW `��. ... ����' i /i�C..flrt.L _t-a�✓ � t..rC..:•f.r.�L�:..�l.j'1-a-�.•�.l �.�'f r�l ..`..._`/ ,r►,�r1;rh+ �rr•. r • ..�....v ::r ,.�-s.,ltt.4�i `�.-i,,,��'3.4�,i�•r t•!�.�K'--�rS''' �''•L,'� 1 r � , �' �.u. �t;L(c•c.t t:�� / .,,ram II •r„�,•• , . �(�e../�-f J� ::4.1.•�i ��,•��cr4. ��WI.�-,�=-�"!.'L..�`e/ ,.��,��ji?L�Kw�'!�u � a. �• `j r„wo^aruXw wu»......�.-•.•...-.....r...a»-.a:._ ....n-..v..r•.s. ..... .a.... ,.. .. .., . .. r,:�:w......_.....,..-....,......+�.:.-�..... If t �-- 7 K,'�.��,�:�•�+� J I /JIB. i 1 Iv Jf•� , 1jli 4L��X.WWZ " ..K� •'•'�••"t.�N(N(, • {{!!{ • 1 ••Y • � .� •�r� f' t w {�~J.tI��'i. ��.`�'�-an,,.• �'r •JIi�✓�. ��y � � r i..r!► `-�'fy�'~, I .. ....� ...... t.• _ .. ....._. ._ ..- ►.�� ._ ._ ..�.�..-....• .-... -► ��-.»-..r• -.�fM_ �,w.�M •tom ` a�.� �•�„� V y.�_ .��r���-•.Yrj.. .•l�'"�.\1t�.� .1 1 f�'��1^�"���'�"r:;•!,1••'�:.•��;-�L''�;�f�s�'rf�'i�,,!r4�....;,��bl'..��• 1'��'"�"�L ♦i-�*Tw w'�"1►tM���u.• �•,�`Gr:.! '� rV����'""�.. �w•'L,� �•1�.— '•�_�l a �• I • , .�{'ti"'''.r'►ya+'�`•f..7�'.+i+��l'l'i••'^S• .�"� � ...�--- _.......,.._...---•---_... ._... - ----.*wYcawt�c►�7ri�'li t' Tit - HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,AMBER of COMMERCE •` 18582 BEACH BOULEVARD,SUITE 224 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92M TELEPHONE(714) 962.6561 1982.83 U EXECUTIVE COMMtT'TEE Amdtnt DODTERRY Terry Dwck A Saab VKt rWi.dt'IL/Prtvdt'Nt Etta August 30, 1982 PALE L.WiN Hxunglon llala13111 Dank Vct ProsrdeM HOBERT D DAVIS Vet Pnvdent OR WLLIAM DMGLAS kkDonne/Mugtat Aavonsuil" Mayor Robert Mandic AC ARoHAMOW and TJcmbers of the City Council Ri"d IUI*W A Aaaxntta P.O. Box 190 INY° `~JAACXGLE Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 lrtt Mftrslofo Bent ;ate p',�i0ira Dear Mayor Mandic: Pact Prtyatra . WJAMCOMPTON As you are aware, the Huntington Beach Chamber of stxiAlwnCaworl++aEatonCc. Commerce is ven" interested in promoting the economic health ,. DOMb OF 01RECTORS-1992 83 of our community. During the last twelve months, the Chamber has followed with interest the City's efforts through its �A JEROMEM GAMECommmity and Neighborhood rmhancement Program to stimulate AtlWntyatLaw economic growth and to promote stabilization of our declining STAN DOTELHO neighborhoods. • raentral TtNptorrt Co WINE On August 16, 1982, the Chamber Board of Directors had JACK WMAN an opportunity to review the proposed plan for the Main-Pier 5wht.nCaWOT"CksCo. Redevelopment Area. After considerable discussion of the merits S¢;,;',,ES+,,'"es sv.,c.Co. of the proposal, the Board of Directors voted unanimously to '4 jj.WHOL., support this important endeavor and to recommend to the City aargt City a&* Council that the plan be adopted. The Chamber of Comirerce MKE ALN EMMRa,00l So.catA. recognizes the value of this effort to the overall City and ' JAtKlWOIEY we offer our support in its adoption and future implementation. The CoNcton Agency of H B GrtdyC�wAccountant Our Vice President and Chairman of our DOAnton%n Development MARLYNORA Committee, Dick Harlow, will represent the Chamber at your .� • ActmMLegatSerweet September 7 hearing. SWAN E OSDORN Tht CcAdh vwks DON PA)HARD Sincerely - n lAt Ots�+a WLL4UA PETERSON 1ltato y Ri 1 •• MAW R,cw.loNo ixe utive Vice President Eianer.a' JOYCEROwestern k41kii1 Escro U W r JRlpm Wta:tw SPENCERSHELMW cc: City Council ArrrnoA U 5 A,MC. DALESM11H City Administrator JC.Prnner Director Bus./Ind. Bnterprise4--- RlCHAnot TOM P4JWd I Torn A A;koc+attt,A I A 'TARRY WASHA The Fiosoway I ROGER WORK CLANcrrooaR ' 1.lan.IJ<r 'a•a n•CeSrntah.t r ..► �...�..�_..... .... ,.._.�_, w.....�-.«.....�.--�.--�.�...�•-w..-Y .:t.f•-....... s. ...—..:.�ii..a. —`.--..-•++w�...w+..wr..T.l.✓.:.e�VR�iw.Wot►R',�n[L��4+�.Y�NN 3 ' • CITY OF wu � NTINGTON BEACH . INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►nlYnKic v 51ACH To Alicia M. Wentworth From 95rh Tincher, director City Clerk Business 6 Industrial Enterprise ! i Subic:t FISCAL IMPACT REPORTS FOR MAIN 1ER,. Date Octoi;er 6, 1982 ! YORKTOWfi-LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH PROJECTS +CA r_O,e w j J Attached are the Fiscal ImpAct Reports for each of the above named projects. These i reports should be inserted as Appendices "B" in the "Reports to the City Council". TT:Jib attachments . i i arc t i I 'j 7 :L: - � 1. ..Ny+.vw_.tyy..M►X•YJ�.Ssi:.S.Yf�..a+?P`. �1'.Yt1 r, } ' 1 AUDI pITOROR-CONfROLLER U NYY O FINANCE BUILDING 630 NORTH BROADWAV P.O. Box 561 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPNON[s 671-2150 AREA CODE 714 Y OFFIC{i OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER September 23, 198:2 i SUBJECT: City of Huntington Beach Community Redevelopment Agency - Main Street - pier Project Pursuant to Section 33328 of seq. of the California Health and Safety s_odo, you will find anclosed your copy of the E'iucal Impact Report for the subject redevelopment agency. Further inquiries may be directed to the: • 'qk County of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office `xs Attn: Tax Section =•� 630 N. Broadway ' P. O. Box 567 y Santa Ana, CA 92702-0567 S I 14 may.. ' `j•,-`/.� f '.�`.', Judy Gale Accountant Tax Section . • JG:01 ' Enclosures T' ..r "zS .. •sM+...t".LYiA4'.:74L Mta.w....w+s...r...:JC..:F+.r.:.:.... .....a ....�t.t..w+.— ..« ..✓�sM�1..+..+ L `t i 1 ` TABLE I - HEALTH & SAFETY - CODE 33323 (A) CITY OF HUNTINGION BEACH - MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT Secured Assessed Value -• Local Roll $3,786,753 StatO Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll # Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Rosl 1,666,565 Total Assessed Value within t%e Project $5,453,318 �I o v i!o t Available At This Time „_„• • { f t j } 4 ' • TABLE II - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (B) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT REPORT OF IDENTIFICATION OF TAXING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE PROJECT The district numbers and the taxing agencies' names are: 001E County Inside Excluding CSFP (County General) 1 054A Huntington Beach Cit7 300B Coast Community College Dist. - aasic 310A Huntington Beach Union High School Dist. 312A Huntington Beach School District 600A School Modification Aid (Dept. of Education ) 601A School •Institution Tuition Tax (Dept. of Education) 707A Orange County Transit District 710A Orange County Flood Control District 713A Oranga County HaAors, Beaches and Parks District 744A Orange County vector Control District 820P MWO-MWDOC - Remainder Area 863E M E10C - Original Area ' 926A Orange County Sanitation Dist. #11 9GOA Orange County Water District 961A Orange County Water District - Water Reserve ti TABLE,in— HEALTH '& SAFETY CODE 33328 (C) (( CITY OF HUNTINGTON'BEACH - MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT ; s � REPORT OF 1982-83 BASE YEAR REVENUE EACH DISTRICT CAN EXPECT FRCP! WITHIN'THE PROJECT c � Bonded Basic Levy Indebtedness Total _ Fund Dist. Agency Name Revenue_ Revenue 82-83 Revenue t 0049-01 054A Huntington Beach City $10,939.89 $2,952.11 $13,892.00 E 0072-16 820P, 4.WD-KWDOC-Remainder Area - 95F.58 958.58 0075-01 863B MWDOC-Original Area - - - 0100-03 001E Orange County 3,608.99 24.61 8,623.60 r 2291-01 600A Department of Education 733.35 - 733.35 } 4001-01 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 1,467.05 134.75 1,601.80 ! 4051-01 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches 6 Parks Dist. 957.55 - 957.55 5321-01 744A Orange County Vector Coiitrol Dist. 106.83 - 106.83 ' 5331-01 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 245.95 - 245.95 s, 5881-01 960A Orange County Water Dist. 440.70 - 440.70 t 5901-01 961A Orange County Water Dist. - Water Reserve 5.84 - 5.84 j 714.1-01 310A Huntington Beach Union H.S. Dist. 11,999.28 469.09 12,468.37 ! 7311-01 3008 Coast Community College Dist. - Basic 5,069.15 - 5,069.15 8251-01 312A Huntington Beach School Dist. 12,181.01 1,966.49 14,147.50 j 9091-01 926A Orange County Sanitation• Dist. #11 1,777.59 100.65 1,878.24 TRA 'TOTAL $54,533.18 $6.606.28 $61,139.46 � t y - , • TABLE IV - HEALTH & SAfETY CODE 33328 (D) { CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - MAIN ST. PIER PROJECT REPORT OF TOTAL AD VALOREM REVENUE EACH DISTRICT HAS AVAILABLE FROM WITHIrl AND OUTSIDE THE PROJECT The revenue data necessary to complete this section of the Fiscal Review Report does not currently exist because of the iwpact of Assembly Bill 8. An inordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Auditor-Controller's , staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Reporr dohs i►ot contain the total Ad Valoren novenue information for the projedt area. There has been included, however, a supplemental table of comparative assessed values for each taxing district to give a re,l3tive .indication of Base Year Revenue percentage .• given up to the CRA. See Table IV(D) , Supplement. I� • I s -- TABLE IV - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (D) SUPPIX-�U Y1T { CITY OF HM:TIt;G ON BEACH - MAIN STREET - PIER PROJECT REPORT OF BASE YEAR 1982-83 CRA A.V. PERCENTAGE RELATIONSHIP TO TOTAL TAXING DISTRICT'S A.V. 1 Taxing District's Percent of A.t. Within the Taxing District's Project AV i Dist. Acen;y Name Projii&-. A.V. - County-wide to District 002E County Inside Excluding CSFP (County General) $5,453,3I8 $49,736,868,136 .0110 054A Huntington Beach City 5,453,318 5,883,904,006 .r327 f 300B Coast Community College Dist. - Basic 5,453,318 16,762,650,086 .0325 J s 310A Huntington Beach Union H.S. Dist. 5,453,318 9,172,131,892 .0595 312A Huntington Beach School Dist. 5,453,318 2,543,214►897 .2I44 ' 600A School Modification Aid (Dept. of Education) 5,453,318 70,394,280,403 .00"7 60iA School Institution Tuition Tax (Dept. of Education) 5,4S3,318 70,394,280,403 .0077 707A Orange County Transit Dist. 5,453,318 70,394,260,403 .0077 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 5,453,318 70,394,280,403 .0077 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches s Parks mist. 5,453,318 70,394,280,403 .0077 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 5,453,319 70,377,080,051 .0077 820P bVD 14WDOC-Remainder Area 5,453,318 48,708,913,761 .0112 863E MT)OC-Original Area 5,453,318 48,G66,757,603 .0112 926A Orange County Sanitation Dist. #11 5,025,746 3.895,516.03E .1290 960A Orange County Stater Dist. 5,453,318 47,365,335,538 .OlIS 961A Orange County Water DZst. - Water Reserve 5,453,313 46,969,210,975 .01I6 one percent 1.000C t } r � � TABLE VI - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (E) CITY OF HUNTINMU BEACH - MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT REPORT OF AGENCY'S REVENUE IN FIRST YEA1 The Auditor-Controller has been advised by the Huntington Beach Community Redevelopment Agency that no major structures and improvements will be made within the Project boundaries during the first year, so therefore we anticipate a consex- vativo growth in value of the area within the Project boun- daries to increase by only 5.7 F.:rcent. Total 1982-83 Base Year Revenue $61,139.46 Total Expected Percentage Increase in Values 5.7% 1983-64 Increment Tax Revenue Estimate S 3,484.95 i Y., E 'i Y i� t i j t TABLE IV HEALTH 6 SAFETY CODE 33328 {F) + CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT REPORT OF ASSESSED VALUATION BY BLOCK WI711IN THE PROJECT 1 Health and Safety Code, Section 33328 (f) required: "The assessed valuation of the project area, by block, for the preceding five years, except for state assessed property on the board roll." The Assessed valuation data necessary to complete this section of the Fiscal. Review Report does not exist because the valuation files maintained by the county do not contain historical assessed values by block. An inordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Assessor's turd County Auditor's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Report does not contain the preceding five-year assessed valuation information for the project area. . • Y.• rrT. r71: }M1 � 4 • S .C],�rYYl.lwww..�rw•wtirn...s+t•:.fTwr.•'a�'F.s' ..r•�..••..w.r....a.•.r..+ef).w.r.... � `.y�.1n. ..,,1.<.t..a.....+.........� w�.+Itf 1 r r t i TABLE V - slEALTH a SAFETY CODE 33328 (G) j CITY OF IIUNTI14GTON BEACIi MAIN ST. - PIER PROJECT REPORT OF 1982-83 ASSESSED VALUATICN OF PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET Secured Assessed Value - Local Roll $10,996,478 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 1,07G,175 Total Assessed Value Within 300 Feet •$12,072,653 * Not Available: At This Time �I i c I • I •---• ......,_....._....—.._................. . .v..K- • •.,.. _...__ ___.... -. ..>. . .... _... ..ry.. »....._..._ --•,.....-.r.,.*..au.s.c..+;-�nxR•r.as�nam.�s.rc«�+�5lwlll.+ r"1 REQUES1 FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Dine August., 31, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City AdministratolwX Prepared by: _'}i'om Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: APPROVAL OF MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CERTIFYING TO AGENCY REVIEW OF FINAL EIR Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: 4. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached is Agency Resolution No. 47 which makes certain findings concerning the mitigation of any adverse environmental impacts, certifies that all steps required by law for the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and processing of the EIR have been taken, and approves the Redevelopment Plan and determines that the use of tax increment funds outside the boundaries of the Project Area for the put-pose of providing affordable housing will be of benefit to the project. RECOMIMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 47. ANALYSIS: This action represents the final Agency step in the long and complex process which must be undertaken to establish a redevelopment project area. In addition to meet- ing all the legal requirements and proceedings, staff has personally, contacted each affected taxing agency and made an effort to discuss' the proposed plan with all the property owners. An attempt Las also been made to inform the general public of these endeavors. As a result of these efforts, we feel the 'project which you are considering is feasible and that the redevelopment requirements have been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process. ro 'ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resol'ution 2. Redevelopment Plan'and EIR (see Council F- solution No. 5157 and Ordinance No. 2578. CWT:TT:jb 0104181 'NVL1f:^..r�.i I.a'vrit,..•+''.i• .'✓ ..,.` n.. i. . •' ,. .. .._ .. .;.. . . -.. ., .. ,'�!... 'ate �r.ow.w...".�. na..�...:,,..rM' ' I / r REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION pate Ugust 31, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratorr� Prepared by:71 Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise II Subject: ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FOR WITHIN THE MAIN-PjER PROJECT AREA 1-2 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached is Agency Resolution No. 48 which adopts and establishes procedures for approving development proposals within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. The establishment of these procedures would then reouire that, prior to Agency approval of any development agreement which would necessitate possible acquisi- tion by the use of eminent domain, said development proposal would have to first be approved by no less than 60 percent of the property owners representing 60 i percent of the land holdings within the site being considered as part of the development•proposal. RECOMMENDATION: .I Adopt Resolution No. 48. ANALYSIS: 'I The establishment of these procedures will' reflect the City's commitment ,to insure meaningful owner participation in the redevelopment *process; that will require that the City and prospective developers work cooperatively with property owners through- out the area to establish plans that will be of benefit to all. Given the nature of the existing ownership patterns and the interest that has been expressed by many of the existing property owners, we do not feel that such procedures will present'a major obstacle to our redevelopment efforts, but rather promote the cooperation which is essential to our future success. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not adopt the resolution and thus eliminate the necessity for the proposed process to be implemented. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 48. CWT:TT:jb PIO 4t81 a.{:}tom+�4.,ilf� i'X aiJ ;i. - '�'pi, - ..... ._._ .... .... ,-.......... ... "�.t•.,.�r.r,«.w..ys�,ci_tyf."a;74V?*+?!•e•"' ..a .., •t . .. ... .. . ..%t . '. '• tV 1 .n+•' :Si*jf• )�(' s;`t.'."••!e!"np�t(•yttS•'. ti !.•. i +9 r-, REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Date u4st 31._ 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator i� / Prepared by: Tom Tincher, Director of business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: ADO"'ING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTING PROCEDURES gtatement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: California Community Redevelopment Law and C.E.Q,A require that the Redevelopment Agency adopt environmental impact reporting procedures. The attached resolution i simply states that the Agency will utilize the procedures which are currently being followed by the City and that the Redevelopment Agency will serve as a "local agency" pursuant to C.C.Q.A. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution adopting the existing City 'procedures for preparing aring and proces- sing environmental impact reports as those which the Redevelopment Agency has and will follow. ANALYSIS: (same as above) ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: None. The Agency must adopt the procedures prior to consideration of the EIR's which have beer prepared for the proposed redevelopment plans. ATTACHMENTS:' i 1. Resolution 2. Procedures CWT:TT:3b ,.1'ln 9C1, Y:.lW..if'r,:s;:11`::�,:.r...:�3:..iY.JA\%a P. -ih... ... .[.r�,t .r. ..... .� .1 .� .�: ... .. ....... . ♦ -r.a.� ,,.. /�.a,,,y''"" .. ..... T......�...,,...,,.;.�,r�.?.j'4; y jkq b , REQUEST FOR *REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Data Augusj 31, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted b : Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Y p + Y 1 Prepared by:-��om Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Sjbject: TRANSMITTAL OF REPORTS ON TALBERT-BEACH, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT.PLANS TO CITY COUNCIL _qq) / 5 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Anelysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: ' Prior to the public hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plans, you will be asked, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, to consider adopting the atte: red resolutions which approve and transmit the "Report to the City Council" for each of the above named projects. These reports have been prepared pursuant to Section 33352 of the 1 State of California Health and Safety Code. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolutions. ANALYSIS: r Section 33352 of the Health and Safety Code requires that every redevelopment plan submitted by the Redevelopment Agency to the legislative body (City Council) shall be accompanied by a report containing specific detailed information as set forth in said Section 33352. The attached documents have been prepared pursuant to this requirement. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: i Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolutionsi 2. Reports to the City Council 44 f' CWT:TT:jb F r Yv' t� ._ P10 4181 i- I REQUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL 'A ON • Date August 26, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council / Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat r Prepared by: �qjTom Tincher, Director of Business and Industr l--f erprise Subject: ADOPTION OF MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPME AN �L 2f,D J4 &Y-2L Statement of Iswe, Reooi mww1@Wn,Analysis, Fundibg Sours,Alternative Action:,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law, the Huntington Beach City Council and Redevelopment Agency may hold a Joint public hearing to consider pub- lic input prior to taking action on the Redevelopment Plan. After the staff re- port is presented and the public hearing is held, the City Council and Redevelop- ment Agency will have several actions which must be taken. Acting as the City Council you will be asked to consider adopting the attached resolution which approves and certifies the EIR and introduce the ordinance which adopts the Redevelopment Plan. Both of these matters will be considered after- you have taken several actions in your capacity as the Redevelopment Agency. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and certify EIR and introduce ordinance. ANALYSIS: These actions represent the final steps in the long and cumplex process Abich must be undertaken to establish a redevelopment project area. If V.,e ordinance is introduced on September 7, 1982, it is anticipated that the second reading would take place on September 21, with the plan becoming effective 30 days thereafter. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing and introduce ordinance. 2. Continue: the public hearing for additional input. 3. Not Adopt ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Environmental Impact Report 3. Ordinance 4. Redevelopment Plan t ' CWT:TT:,jb { �liior�...+...vwrarw-.a+m......_...:rrt,,•,r:.y,;.:. .,...'.y.;.•,Jt r,:.x .. ...»....,,.. .. ....i. .. ....... ..w..............r..c:.zrSSRic.:93:4ttS"wi.Gi:fi.?.+c1'.'�f#YJK97.:r.�fw il!`yL7� 1�'. t - r ,- ,- 7. REQUEST rOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY M iffi • "Prtovrn n"Y - Dat —July 26, cit�8 �c�oUNctc. Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Age 19 Submitted b1►: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator �, �, .,,•, Prepared by: 91Tom Tincher, Director of Business and ladustrial Enterprise Subject: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ADOPTION OF MAIN=PIER, YORKTOWN=LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND CERTIFICATION GF CORRESPONDING EIR's Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative AtKions,Attachments: -Te— STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we have completed, including the recent appointment of the Project Area Committee for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, we are now in a position'to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearings at which time the above named Redevelopment Plans and EIR's will be considered for adoption and certification. RECOMMENDATION: Approv. resolution setting a joint public hearing with the City Council for 7:30 p ni. , Tuesday, September 7, 1982. ANALYSIS: j Redevelopment ,Law .requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weeks prior to the time at which the nearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August 2 meeting if we are to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. • ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting date until some time in the future. CWT:TT:jb Pln V61 �.�-ter... n.w.. ....�-..v.M..r;'i:4.n.t r•.c•t w�..,.. . ,....I r.. - ...- . .:)..•.....f-v wn+•r�f.:. ..L'..yr '... v . .... � .v. i... '.. i'...f.:«.3.:t.'yITSIAi M74.�t13.�gdl,RY:73:,R�• f 1 1 ;\f•` /.. Wire/ REQUES'. FOR CITY COUNCIL \CTIQN Date July 26, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council r� � Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator (7111'el �5 Prepared by: 09170m Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ADOPTION OF MAIN-PIER, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING EIR's Statement of Issue,Fiecomm xidation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:91,1 STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we have completed, including tha recent appointment of the Project Area Committee for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, we are now in a position to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearings at which time the above named Redevelopment Plans and EIR's will be considered for adoption and certification. RECOMMENDATION: i Approve resolution setting a joint public hearing with the Redevelopment Agency for 7:30 p.m. , Tuesday, September 7, 1982. ANALYSIS: Redevelopment Law, requires that a public ear be held hearing h 1 when consideration is bean p 9 p 9 9 given to. establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weel-s prior to the time at which the hearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August 2 meeting if we are to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. IXOVT.D ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting date until some time in the future. CWT:TT:jb 1 ji No 4181 • REQUEST REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACf ,,i Date May 14, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency ott. ■ m iAdministratorAypaoVEU DY GiT'� CO'IlN Submitted by. Charles W. Thompson, City �-� tV.„,.. Prepered by: ,a�)rom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enter^risE Subject: RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF REDEVELOPM NT �tTY'uti AND PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR's FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH, OAKVIEW, 'n YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS tX' .w�+.w+./�w ��.. ■ i�.arw�.�rr u.�■q■w lw M r b.n. wrrr� .� _ s:stenwt of Imue, Recommendation,tnslysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached for your review and transmittal are copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plans for the four prbject areas stated above, and their respective Preliminary Draft EIR's. The action being taken is once again a preliminary step in the over- all Redevelopment Plan process which is required to insure adequate public input an: City and Planning Commission involvement. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize transmittal of Redevelopment plans and preliminary Draft EIR's for public rnmment and revir.-w and to fulfill the procedural requirements of California Com- munity kedevelpmer,t Law and C.E.Q.A. ANALYSIS: Tht. transmittal of these documents to the•PlaAing Commission, the Chief Administra- tive Officer of the County and other public agencies initiates the formal review j and reporting procedures for generating required input and responses which will be considered at the public hearing when the final Redevelopment Plan will be acted upon. Of greatest concern at the present is whether or not we can follow the required procedures and have the,plans effective by August 199 1982. This date is important in that it is at that time that the base tax role is annually established. If we can have an adopted plan by that date, the tax increment financing.of project costs will be expedited by one year; otherwise, we dill have to utilize next year's base role and, thus, lose a year of appreciation in property values and increased taxes. By trar:mitting these ducuments at this time we will be in a position to proceed as rapidly as possible in firming up development proposals and disposition and ! development agreements for each of the project areas involved. As you are aware, this is of considerable interest and concern in regards to the Talbert-Beach senior I citizens pro3ect and certainly would assist in our efforts to move forward in the Oakview Neighborhood Enhancement Area. Likewise, the schedule which we have esta- blished will allow us to be in a position to respond immediately to development proposals that will evolve after the Coastal Zone Land Use Plan and Specific Plans are adopted. fin 41#014 ,C'Iwnee.'.�.:'w.. ..::+"a.r•r sn. ..a.. .-...... :e ... .,.,.. -..:.. ,.._...�,.. .._. ,. .. .,.. •. .. _ .......�........... ..... rt.•.�•sr■.'.t.a�.YTr.�C+-. "j�iaH•" FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: » Not to proceed at this time. However, such a delay would, in all likelihood, preclude our ability to have a project adopted and in effect prior to the August 19 deadline. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 28 transmitting Talbert-Beach proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 2. Resolution No. 29 transmitting Qakview proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 3. Resolution No. 30 transmitting Yorktown-Lake proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 4. Resolution No. 31 transmitting Main-Pier proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. CWT:TT:Jb 1 r R REQUEST r 'rt- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTTVA' l • �aM Apri 1„28, , 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopilient A cy Submitted by,, Charles H. Thompson, City Ad mini stra�o d` Prepared by: ':29Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subjrct: RECEIVING AND TRANSMITTING PRELIMINARY REDEVELOPMENT PLANS c .1�1�11irylYrY�111A•11111Iw/.�.IM�r a.r�rw .��r.r. rr�_—.� �.rw.�� Statement of Woo R000mmeWstien,Analysts, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attechments: STATEMENT OF I5SUE: Pursuant to Section 33233 of the 'California 'Community Redevelopment Law, attached are preliminary plans which have been approved by the Planning Commission on April 209 1982 as reflected by the appropriate resolutions which are included. The next step of the redevelopment process for each of the proposed project areas is for the Redevelopment Agency to acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plans, adopt said preliminary plans and direct the Secretary to transmit said plans to the appropri- ate government agencies. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolutions for each preliminary plan. 4 ANALYSIS: This step is 'sti.11 'a preliminary step in the overall •1egal process which must be. pursued in the implementation of a redevelopment program. Upon adoption and trans- mittal, of these documents, staff will prepare a proposed redevelopment plan which reflects a refinement of this information, as well as the appropriate E!R. These documents will bo forwarded to the Redevelopment Agency next month. The information contained in the EIR and the proposed plan will 'ther, be discussed with affected property owners, taxing agencies and interested persom, during 'the next ;evoral months, with the formal consideration of these documents not coming until some ',;ne in August of this year. At that time a formal public hearing will be required on all the information generated to date and throughout the next j several tionths. FUNDING SOURCE: None required. i ATTACHMENTS: ; 1. Resolution 023 receiving the preliminary plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Protect Area. 2. Resolution #24 receiving the preliminary plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Protect Area. 3. Resolution #25 receiving the preliminary plan for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelop- ment Project Area. 4. Resolution #26 receiving the preliminary plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment ?roject Arpa. CWT.TT.�, b -....—.+•�.......,.....��.........•.. ..a_... .�...-. . .... •-� •!:+ .:f... .. .. , _ ., ... - ..... .. ......•�....i...y...�..r.u...�aea:WKa'YJ.YR'3brN►'.........—•��.r.r.cnwJ� 1• EQIJE'T FV . VELOPMENT %ENCY ACTION - '�� 30-b'� O A,c,.C, p�-pproJ�I� RH 89-13 ....._. r'Qhl►�ill�rr�tC►� bit JAP— s� lt uAls;+sDate lauu 30 19RQ Ir�V� COr►�n�wn«�+t.t t��•.�S.t."Dt� ate' a P- �',t�.a,� Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redeverlopingnt Agency Members Submitted by: Paul Cook, Executive Director Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Development AUTHORIZE WULLNER PRopEritry (SHANK HOUSE)AS RELOCATION SITE Subject: FOR PIER REALTY, AND AUTHORIZE FINAL PREPARATION OF APPROPRIATE AGREEMENTS Consistent with Council Policy' KI Yes I 1 filew Policy or Exception Statement of issue, nelcummendation,AnalyAs, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STAIE ?OF 1SSUE- The Redevelopt;.ent Agency has acquired on a willing-seller basis a number of properties In the second block of Main Street, bounded by Sth, Walnut and Olive Avenues, as a catalyst for the second block new constructIon/rehab project currently underway. Correspondingly, the Agency staff has been working to relocate a number of businesses within the Main Street Pilase I and Second Black retail park!,,g structure project elsewhere within the downtown area. Or such business is Pier Realty who Is presently a tenant of the city in the see9nd block. Agency staff has also been working with a third party (Mr. do Mrs. Robert A. Butener) seeking a replacement funding source for furthering our Main-Pler redevelopment activities. RECOMMENDED A, MON: 1) Authorize the staff to finalize an agreement between Robert A. do Maxine Butcher and the Huntington beach Redevelopment Agency that will provide for the sale of certain Agency-owned properties to the Butchers, with a lease back to the Agency with options to repurchase; and. 2) Approve; the use of the Shank property as a relocation site for Pier Realty, and direct staff to complete the assignment of the Butcher agreement, with an option to purchase, to the Pier Realty principals that will provide for the ongoing use of that property by'Pler Realty. ALYS S: A third party funding source 0-it wili .:sslst the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency In furthering its downtown r%ttevelopment efforts without placing additional funding requirements on the city of Huntington Beach, has been Identified. The Agency has previously purchased a number of properties within the Main-Pier Project Area on a willing seller basis, and is currently land banking those properties for future redevelopment projects within the Core area. The proposed 4Sreetnent in concept, with P1011185 µ..ww—a.a.a+...+�. .. w.. r arm.. .. .... .1. .. - ... .. .. ...'nT.P. .. `�fa'ljp��«FYI{•%aiTY•l•?riyj O.n` 1 � a the Butchers, provides for them purchasing various properties owned by the Agency totaling approximately $1 Million, thus providing an additional funding source for future downtown redevelopment efforts. The agreement would provide for lease payments commencing at 10% interest and the option to purchase. During the terms of the agreement, the Agency+could substitute other properties under its ca nti-0, should any of those properties encumbered by the outstanding agreement be needed for redevelop:cAnt purposes. The properties we have identified in the second blocV that would be so►d to ii.e Butchers are Wullner(Shank house), 5th and Walnut, $450,000; Terry Body Shop, 212 Fifth Street, $315,00; and the Burnes property, Fifth and Walnut, $285,000. In addition, as part of our relocatle:j efforts, we have identified a specific user!or the Wullner property (Shank house) who desires not only to lease that property from us, but to assume an assignment of our responsibility to Butcher under that agreement. That party would be the principals of Pier Realty, Natalie Kotsch and Tom Van Tuyl. Our obligations under the Butcher agreement, would be assigned to the Pier Realty Croup, who in turn, would have an option to purchase that property from us for our original acquisition cost, plus all improvements that the Agency will have made to the property at the time of its purchase by Pier Realty. In staff's analysis, proceeding with the above transactions, will facilitate many of our objectives within the Core area by providing an additional funding source for needed redevelopment efforts, providing for the relocation of a viable business back Into the pr tect area, and the preservation and restoration of a significant historic structure, that being the Shank house. hLIERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1) Do not proceed with agreements with the Butchers for sale of various Agency--owned parcels in the second blocs; of Fifth Street; and 2) Do not proceed with using the Shank house as a relocation site for Pier Realty, and direct staff to seek additional proposals. EUNDLNS S2lIRCE: None required as a result of this action. ATTACI-IMENT; • 1) Site Map. PECIDI.B:lp 4386h . ., .. z..... ......... ... ..,. . . ..., .. .a, ..,'.a t:. 1]r:'..t'•..r:`i=} LK3tvLt`^{r..•',1rL,!R1n;r r. t ` EXHIBIT A Redevelopment Agency Owned rr,perty in the Second �I Block of hittir,Street r 4 3 2 / M OLIVE 27 .h fi 14 ' 3 � 15 42 3 _ (S) 10 9 " 3o 37 9 6 8 �•� 9 6 10 10 REQUEb f FOR CITY, COUNCik.. ACC`ICON oN 1-3 o.89 C•�y COUsic,L OPP/a'O RH 89--16 J Zr 3 J,f1 tato Inmin 7,n,* 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator,C, - Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Developme Subject: MAIN PIER.PHASE H LAND USE CONCEPTS APPROVE}i3Y CITY CU�3NCII. ` r Consistent with Council Policy? ( ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Excep on tu = � CITY CLUKK Statement of lssua, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Atta menu: 51AILMEN1 QE ISSUE: 1 The city is negotiating with Griffin Realty and certain;::operty owners for the "1 development known as Main-Pier Phase II within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. At this time, staff needs further direction as to acceptable land use concepts. RECbMhffiNDATIQN: 1) Approve the proposed land use development concept. 2) Direct staff to proceed with negotiations with development :end property owners. 3) Direct staff to conduct an economic analysis of the prefere:i land use concept. 0. 7'hA�`' AC004% -4 A;rrct a0l rye is MA. / ,1.1. fiF,f4 4oAn Gl1rr. . The city presc:tly has an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement thru July 1, 1989, with Griffin Realty and property owners for the redevelopment of the two blocks bounded by Main & Sixth Streets, and PCH and Walnut Avenue, also known as Main-Pier Phase 1I. We have attempted to meet the needs of the"Maid Street Property.Owners" by suggesting :a development plan which will provide for individually constructed properties with ground floor retail and second story office uses. This plan has met oaposition from the property owners. Concerns have been expressed about the viability of the downtown office i market. While staff and consultants agree that there is likely to be a long--term demand for neighborhood office uses in the downtown area, they are concerned about the feasibility of constructing individually owned office uses above each retail store, which eliminates the opportunity to achieve the critical mass necessary for a comprehensive ! plan. An alternative now under review is to develop a plan which woull provide for r -ndominium ownership of ground floor retail space over which would be developed office uses on Main Street and a portion of PCH. This alternative would provide the developer with the ability to comprehensively plan and manage the development above the ground floor level. NO Sm This plan may meet with resistance from property owners who want to retain direct control of their property because at a minimum, this plan would require acquisition of the air rights above the ground floor level. Further, for those property ownc.s who do not wish to participate in any way with a comprehensive development scheme, acquisition of total property Interest could be required. Some time ago, the Council determined that Fifth Street should remain open to PCH as a "visual corridor." Plans prepared by the developer have attempted to achieve this goal while minimizing the impact on the condominium development by providing b narrowed Fifth Street with somewhat limited access. Concerns were expressed by some property owners and our own economic consultants regarding the continued vlabilit3,of retail uses on Fifth Street, above Walnut Avenue, if access on Fifth is constrained. however, it now appears that closure of Fifth Street may be necessary to achieve a financially feasible development plan. EUNDIN_G SOURCE: None as a result of this action. ALTERNATE ACTIONS: 1) Deny the proposed land use concept. 2) DIrect staff to look at alternative land use concepts. 1 PECJKBB:lp a333r I COUNC ACTION { 7rable /� 19 � RH 83-84 r�� Date a amber 12. 1288 AP Submitted to: cITY cs.aic H nd City Council Members Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator � Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Developme t Subject: FACADE GRANT PROGRAM FOR MAIN-PIER PROJECT AREA Consistent with Council Policy? [ [ Yes [ j Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: RATEMENT Oi I55(IE: At its joint study session with the Planning Commission on January 25, 1988, the City Council directed staff to prepare a recommended program of financial incentives for owners of buildings subject to the seismic sffety ordinance. On February 16, 1988, a seismic and facade improvement loan program for the Main-Pler Redevelopment Project Area was submitted for Council review. This report recommends modifications to the February 16, 1988, proposal with respect to this program. ` BECO MMENDATION: 1) Authorize staff to implement a facade Improvement program within the Main--Pier Project Area on a "demonstration block"bounded by Main & Sth Streets, Olive and Walnut Avenues. 2) Approve facade rehabilitation grants for eligible property owners in amounts not to exceed: a) 15,625I 625/11near front foot),for 25' single-story structures b) 31,2501 625/11near front foot) for 50' single-story structures c) 21,875 ( 875/11near front foot) for 25' two-story structures d) 143,750 ( 875/linear front foot) for 50' two-story structures e) Grants for exposed side and rear facades will not exceed $200/11near foot; must be eplied to side and rear improvements s f) 0,000 for corner property at Walnut and Main($625/linear foot for side lA front tt facade; $200/11near foot for rear facade) f 3) Approve a budget not to exceed $800,000 for the facade improvement grant prggratq. ; 4) Approve change In the funding source for this project from the current CDBG , �, residential rehabilitation program (previously approved funding source). Instear, funtlaS= this project from funds been paid to the Agency by Mola Corporation for land rV ;::I acquisition for the Town Square project. U1 � a x a • CX.] ••n Pia aro5 , f�ts �.:`.; h' ,., .:;,. ; •'".' - . _ ;; .'`S„•. ,r. . >i :j, 14w:;���I��;Mc r'y�7 r^t``,4�.' ":1�'! • I I I 1 5) Authorize financial assistance in amounts equal to the facade grant program for those property owners who prefer to construct new improvements rather than rehabilitate their property. 6) Apply current parking requirements only to the extent that rehabilitation or new construction results in increased square footage above that which currently exists within each building on the demonstration block. 7) Authorize a 50% reduction of in-lieu parking fees to be assessed for required parking. ` Fees to be amortized over a five-year period at an interest rate of 8%. AN LYSIS: Initially, staff recommended that the Federal Government Section 312 loan program he t utilized to assist property owners in financing their seismic improvements on this block. This program was to be coupled with a facade grant program using Community Development Block Grant funds. In developing implementation procedures for this program, it became apparent that the complex Section 312 loan program requirements would be difficult to administer for this project. Further, the use of Community Development Block Grant funds (which require that Davis-Bacon prevailing wages be verified for each construction project) also would present administrative problems and additional costs that could limit the success of the program. The current proposal will provide a facade improvement grant to participating property owners subject to their compliance with seismic and building code requirements, downtown design guidelines, and maintenance requirements. Grant funds will be disbursed as improvements are completed in accordance with an Owner Participation Agreement to be entered into between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and the participating property owners. Public Improvements are recommended to support the demonstration block facade Improvement plan including undergrounding of utilities, repaving and lighting in the alley, and new sidewalk treatments. During the preparation of this program, a number of property owners on'the Main Street edge of the demonstration block requested consideration of plans to construct new Improvements on the site. It Is recommended that financial assistance, at the same level proposed for facade Improvements, be provddt d to property owners who wish to construct new buildings on the Main Street edge of the demonstration block. New construction will, of course, be required to follow downtown design guidelines and meet all building code requirements. } As an additional Inducement to the property owners to participate in this program, it is i recommended that parking requirements be deemed met for all existing uses and for all new uses, providing that the square footage which currently exists is not exceeded. Any additional building area created through rehabilitation or through new construction will be required to meet current parking requirements onsite or pay in--lieu of parking fees. The In-lieu of parking fee has been established at $12,000 per space to ba adjusted annually at the rate of construction cost increases determined by the Engineering News Records. However, to provide an additional incentive fur property owners within this demonstration block to rehabilitate or reconstruct their buildings, we are recommending that the in-lieu of viking fee be reduced by fifty percent amortized over a five-year period at an ante.est cost of eight percent. l PIN It is recommended that the grant program and parking Incentives be made available to property owners within the demonstration block for a one-year period Facade Improvement Grant Programs have been an effective stimulus for downtown redevelopment in many other cities including Costa Mesa, Fullerton, and Santa Ana. However, the success of this program will depend totally on the degree of participation by the property owners. In the opinion of staff, the incentives proposed herein will generate a high--level of participation. EUNP NQ SO IRC Payment to Agency from Mola Corporation for land acquired for Town Square project (estimated 1989/89 revenue: $1,000,000). ALTRNATM ACTION: ; 1) Provide no assistance for facade rehabilitation or new construction. This approach would allow for continued deterioration of the properties within the demonstration block. 2) Make funds available on a loan basis instead of in-lieu of a grant or make loans and/or grants available in amounts less than recommended. This approach would limit the level of property owner participation and make the project more difficult to administer. ®,�ACHM1rNTS: 1) Proposed Project Budget. ; h- PEC/DLBAp 4272h r I i COST ESTIMATES FOR SECOND ©LOCK�-hEIiAB One Story $ 625 LF $15,625 = 251 lot $310250 = 50, lot Two Story $ 875 LF $21,875 = 25' lot $43,750 = 50' lot Bear & Side Exposed Facades $ 200 IX Must be applied to rear do side rehab work Single Story Front 300' @ $ 625 $187,500 Twt Story Front 215' @ $ 875 0,188$125 Exposed Rear 1k Side 1,128' A. $ 200 $2259660 .. Corner Lot 80' @ $ 625 $ 501000 1,723' $651,225 Shank House Two Story 192' x $875 $168,000 $8199225 Program Design/Administration Cost $30,775 850 00 KBB:jr y 3824r t:. I ' 1 C i C: REQUEST F&*NREDEVELOP►RENT P'NENCY ACTION RH 88-19 May 16, 1988 Datc. Chairman and Members of thr. Redevelopment Agency d/U .-11G18p i Submitted to: /� Paul Cook, City Administrator, Chief Executive Officer Submitted by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Admininistrator/Community Developm nt 4 Prepared by: CONTINUANCE OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR PARCELS 024-148-01, Subject: 024.154-09 & 10 and 024-153-12 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, fiecomi iendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STA3:EMEN7 OF LSSU At your meeting of M.ty 2, 1988, regarding the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024-149-01; 024-•154-09 k 10; and 024-153-12, it was your action to continue these noticed hearing Items until May 16, 1988. B CS?LY�B�TIQI�I: Staff would again recommend a further continuance of the noticed hearing for the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024--148-01; 024-154-09 k 10; and 024-153-12 until July 5, 1988. ANALYSIS: Agency staff, since the initial scheduled hearings on these matters, has been in negotiation with the property owners regarding acquisition and/or agreements to participate in the project. Progress is being made with regard to the above matters, however, in staff's analysis, a further continuance until July 5 will allow sufficlent time ' to conclude negotiation efforts with regard to each of the properties. EUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable Ai.TERNAIRE ACTIQN: 1) Continue to another date. PEC/DLB:lp 3662h Pm1»es REQUEST ;ICJ REDEVELOPMENT /31SENCY ACTION RH 88--19 Date April 18, 1988 Submitted to: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator, Chief Executive Officer � C ' Deputy City Admininistrator/Communit Develop ment � / 8 Prepared by: Douglas LaBelle, p y y y p Jay="•�" Subject: CONTINUANCE OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR PARCELS 024-148-01, 024-154-09 & 10 and 024-153--12 Consistent w;th Council Policy? ( j Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue. Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: i1 STAMUKM.S2+:..WStE: At yoga-meeting of April 18, 1988, regarding the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024-148-01; 024-154-09 & 10; and 024-153--12, it was your action to continue these noticed hearing items until May 2, 1988. 0 COMMENDA110 Staff would again recommend a further continuance of the noticed hearing for the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024--148--01; 024-154-09 & 10; and i 02 4-153-12 continued until May 16, 1988. ANALYSIS: Staff_received a request from Mr Bill Beard, attorney representing Mr. �Gosney, asking for a further extension until May 16, 1988, due to a scheduling conflict. Agency staff, since the initial continuance, has been In negotiation with these property owners regarding. acquisition and/or agreements to participate in the project. Progress Is being trade with regard to each of the above matters, and In staff Is analysis, a further continuance until May 16 will allow a further opportunity to bring closure to the above matters. FUNQjNO, [TRCE: Not Applicable A�JERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Conclude public:hearings on Resolutions of Necessity on May 2. 2. Continue to another date. PECIDLB:lp 3E62h P10/1/68 it r. �;- ;V REQUEST PO�REDEVELOPMENT /`SENCY ACTION RH 88-19 Date April 18, 1988 Submitted to: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator, Chief Executive Officet��• Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Admininistrator/Community Development Subject: CONTINUANCE OF RESOLUTIONS OF l3ECESSITY FOR PARCELS 024-14"1, 024-154--09 do 10 and 024-,1!i3 12 Consistent with Council Policy? I ) Yes I j New Policy or Exception i Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSlrl:: At your meeting of March 28, 1983, regarding the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024-148-01; 024-154-09 do 10; and 024-153-12, it was your action to continue these notices hearing items until April 18, 1988. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend a further continuance of the noticed hearing for the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024-148-01; 024-154-09 & 10; and 024-153-12 be continued until May 2, 1988. Agency staff, since the.1nitial continuance, has been in negotiation with these property owners regarding acquisition and/or agreements to participate in the project. Progress is being made with regard to each of the above matters, and in staff's analysis, a further continuance until May 2 would allow a further opportunity to bring closure to the above matters. Fljd��c�IIB��: Not Applicable A LTIE AS PLUM ACTION: 1. Conclude public hearings on Resolutions of Necessity on April 18. 2. Continue to another date. PEC/DLB:lp 3662h i r�^ P1011185 '"'+i .,.r;..' ',.�.,�,'.. ^:1,'�+».,., , ,i., .. � . . ..t.. „i•. .. :.;, ._ a ,; .'- .. A} ...., .. `.�j`{.s.i k.`+dt;ft"Y�µ'{�j r�,+.��'r,"�CO} r,l •r '� I ■J 111111FMWAINUi..,Ir.1 1 ` . REQUEST FO, 'REDEVELOPMENT )"SENCY ACTION r March 28, 1988 Date Submitted to: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Adm:.ni:.crator Chief Executive Office Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Admin. , Dir. Comm, Deve Subject: CONTINUANCE OF RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY FOR PARCELS 024-148-01, 024-154-09 & 10 and 024-153-12 , Consistent with Council Policy? QQ Yes f j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STA .NTQj"ISSUE: Several of the parcels that have been scheduled for Agency review on b7arch 28, 1988, for the purpose of adopting resolutions of necessity �+ should be continued to the April 18, 1988 meeting. RECORW I),�TION: Recommend that the noticed hearing for the adoption of Resolutions of Necessity on parcels 024-148-01; 024-354-09 & 10; and 024-153-712 be continued until April 38, 1988. ANALYSIS: Agency staff in the interim will continue to negotiate with these property owners regarding acquisition of their property and/or a--reements to participate in the project. �112I.flS.._643.'RS� Not Applicable A ERNATIVF, ACTION: Continues to another date. F DLB:GG:jr (0310d) s rt Pld/1/85 +�ti�:"+>1'j:!•,Fo y«T'��� ',rJ', .;r w.. .•i , .r - - r. _t. .,f•'�r.",^'a •^'eq-j -rw*n'[.vrY.tT.e•' ; ... ,t�•i.�'r" a . . i". ,: , - _ .+y.'r- t .'r' ✓ t {.. .{ � .�.. J1��, r REQUEST FG . RED_ 1 ��,rY GSENCY ACTION APPRdPE�!DY B C� (, �94 RH 88-53 t" " ( ,�y A f ��/; September 6, 1988 crls�r atq Chairman and Member , t ie Redevelopment Apene.y Submitted to: ---.1l a Paul Cook, Executive Direct&A� Submitted by: Douglas La Belie, Deputy City Administrator/Community Develop nt Prepared by: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR PIER Subject: REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (APN 024-153-12-GOSNEY) y pTea- Statement ' _ Consistent with Council Policy? (,'�' Yes New Policy or Exception of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source:,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Redevelopment Agency is purchasing property in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. This parcel is critical to the project and requires pubic acquisition to complete a needed redevelopment project in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area as amended. This parcel will result in the least private injury for reasons to be articulated at the public hearing. j QMMN12AT1 N: Conduct and conclude the noticed hearing and adopt the attached Resolution of Necessity (Agency Resolution No,/5_20. Lots 4, S, and 6, Block 104 of the Huntington Beach Tract Assessor Parcel 024-153-12. ANALYSIS: t The Agency has been attempting to purchase and consolidate parcels in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area to accommodate a planned development project. After. att,,mpts to acquire this property acquisition, this key parcel now requires condemnation. The adoption of a Resolution of Necessity will authorize the acquisition of.this parcel by eminent domain which will allow the development to proceed as proposed In the Maln-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. I FSji�DiNG SOURt',1�: � Account No. 812ea•I. ALTERNAT]y ACZi;QN: i Do not adopt the Resolution or Necessity and continue negotiations with property owners. I A31ACHME12 1) Resolution 2) Map PEC/17LB:lp 4004h l P1Q/1/85 •"• l .ice 'l. �•?•�:• - v CITY OF HU NTING"EON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNI1NG70H I(AC11 To MAYOR ERSKINE From GAIL HUTTON City Attorney Subject Mayor's Script Date July 1, 1988 Resolution of Necessity Please announce the following on July 5, 1988 before the eminent domain matters: The following hearings shall; 1 . Be for owners of the teal property in question only 2. NOT consider compensation whatsoever since that subject is for the courts, at a later date to decide. 3. The noticed hearings relate solely to issues of: a . The public interest and necessity ' b. Greatest public good and least private injury C. Necessity for the proposed project d. The public use for which the property is to be taKen AIL HUT ON City Attorney M • /cb cc: Members of City Council i:'.G 'r✓M....... w . :a.. ....f.r.. .. ..., ... ......,_... .. .. .. .. ...;r..... ...... ......r. ..._,.......r.....r «r....r,.,..ar.v....,wi..�......+...,.�....-v+.........a.4.R. i f ' t r OFricc of '_Its '' CITY ATTC.? RN EY AGENCY ATTORNEY a P.O.OOX 2740 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON aEACH CALIFORNIA 92647 GAIL HUTTON TELEPHONE city Attorney 1714)536.555E i February 19, 1988 CERTIFIED HAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr . Jack: Leonard Gosney P. 0. Box 23 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-0023 i RE: Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area Parcel Number: 24--153-12 408-410 Pacific Coast Highway Dear Property Owner- By letter dated December 3,1987, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency offered to purchase your property referenced above. Copy of the original offer letter to you is enclosed. Our offer was rejected and our discussions and negotiations to date have not been successful . Therefore you ace hereby notified that the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency will consider adoption of a resolution of necessity to acquire your property by condemnation at a hearing to be held on blarch 28, 1988 at 7 :00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California . This hearing will NOT concern the price to be paid for the property. Issues appropriate for discussion are those dealing with public interest and necessity for your property, and the Agency 's right to acquire your property by condemnation pursuant to Section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure a copy of which is attached hereto for yuur convenience. Notice: You have a right to appear and be heard on the matt%rs referred to in such C .C.P. Section 1240 .030. If you wish to appear at the hearing and be heard, you should file a written request within 15 days of the date of this letter . Your failure to file a written request to appear anO be heard within 15 days after the date of this notice will result in v►aiver of the right to appear..and be heard. i a I s' BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION f POSSIBLE DUE TO AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS 0 OF ; •�A�'°i��'1�+�'Mk2�1I+•� �k;.:,�J�+��t.�. ;�il�_`�'.'1..R�.�`w�:a'+�++�i=� yp,'r�r RF+1o��•7L'IT�JSi�F'Z" �. IL'"i�'iF�_I'!�'i..., �fii"�'n.+�x-. t .1,1.,L' ��.�Z,•pr..+nyr.'. ... ��,-�.... -..-� '�::,...C-: .� •,.+-.......�•wns..+r, rs...., -. .,..... •� .:^f'C::�,ml:r�wr..r.a�...w,•..waa�n.,I<s�.r rn .)���:.''^i. 'YJ,t� ..J •T1 �7=f,7:3��•;!'i�'ti].t�' M{�41r"p.rTQ AI`rZS�LY. ♦r � ' 7 • 1 ' 1 5 l • ( +Y *t7l Lj� 7r LiRir�, i i • (aeY r1z�, { ti•� ;i L^'t�' In Y1 r e_ � :. rr _e � _ •. .`ram .-.�mr Y�--.F. I�' ..,,. .. � • r., ' k• �Sf• p•, , I S f"'0'0-10 ..J,hc Irotvrr Acquisltion for Nropusrd 1'ro' . 161 t. of cn►incr►} rlc►min r►ury brtarquirc properly for ►r foilottr► 1 of►occclprojrct only ;J !; arr. �stahlipublircrc,t ; ►d nr cc�si- roject, t}n4cr l r 'rcl is Planned urloc:►trd in tlrc tl► be rrrastron►pertiblefaith the tstJrulictoad crud the ic;rst J►rit;"hullrt.. ) '!rcpropert .frrr thr: pro ectto be acquired i% ucc. tc976. L41,.11. 1�)7S ch, 1�75. oil. !„��I. erns}'1.fi Pr„ ..15minent p;rmain... r I I I 1 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 2 STATE UE CA:,IFORNIA } 3 ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ? i A ! 1 am emr,i,,yeti in the County cF Orange, State of California . 5 �) I an. over the agi of 18 and riot a party to the within action; my !' 6 !; business addre.°sf, is post Office Box 2740, Huntington Beach, i 1 7 !; California --,`647 . j 8 1 On rat,ruauy 190 39ka _, I served the fore-going documents � 1 9 described as : 10 ;� I Ii 11 Notice of [searing regarding condemnation 12 {; I I 13 �! i 1'1 I on the interested parties in this action by I i6 I� thereof in a sealed envelope with postage tnereon fully prepaid 1 16 + in the United States mail at fluntingtcn Beach, California, ! 17 I addressed as follow,. 18 Mr. Jack Leonard Gosney Mr. Jack Gosney, Jr. i 19 I P. 0. Box 23 p. 0. Box 1134 i 20 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-0023 D"l Mar, CA 921.04 21 +� 11 � 22 � II 2:1 I scat? ar.e under penalty of perjury of Lhe laws of the: state ii c.•i c_aliiornia that_ thi: fc.regaing is true and correct . i 2'' !1 IixecuteJ oil F'e bru.7..y 19, 1988 26 +' 27 �I 3472.1 Coleen Byrne 1 • 1 1 -�� City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF Ce7MMt1NITY DEVir1.OPMENT Building Division 536.5241 HouslnUftWevelepment Division 536.5542 Planning Division 536.5271 Tecember 3, 1987 JACK L. GOSNEY P.O. !lox 23 Runctlo Santa Fe, CA 92067 Re:gardine: Main-Pier Redevelopment tree Parcel No. 14--153-12 Dear Hr.. Gosncy: As you may know, the property whicn you own and which is referenced cbave:, is located within a redevelopment project area. 711e Agency .is seeking to acquire your property and other adjoining properties for a proposed redevelopment project. Therefore, the Huntington Leach Redevelopment Agency hereby makes an offer to acquire your property located at 406-410 Pacific Coast 111ghway, Huntington !leach, California, fo. the sun of $684,500.00, which is segregated as follows: $684,500.00 Land and Improvements $ -0-- Improvements Pertaining to they Realty (Fixtures and Equipment) $684,50o.00 'Focal i 1I1e Agency's offer is thy - full amount determined to be ,just compensation for Lille property. The basis for that determination is explained in the attached Appraisal Sunanlery Statement. It is the Agency's hope that this price is ngrecnble to yo-1 1111d shut the acquisitior can begin immediately. A representative of John Cutler 8 Associates, Lila Agency's Acquisition Agent, will work with you in the acquisition of your property and answer any qurstions you huva rcgllyding this letter and Appraisal Summary Staremen,. The Acquisition Agent call be contacted at (213) 427-2333 (collect). lY✓1f,.wt1..�+...r•tir. .. �.........rw... r.. .A�IS'Y. +JI I.•.... ♦.. ,.n :ill ..Yr .. . .. r.. .. ..o. •w... . Y1r...... •.•.hh4.CC 41rh....MMwr'Ihra.�� �.n.wwv..++r 1 1 , 1 , It is requested thus you acknowledge receipt of the Agency's offer by signing a copy of this letter and returning sane to this office. Your signature on the copy does not signify ucccptunce of the offer to settle the acquisition by the Agency, it oilly acknowledges rec:cipt of Lhe Agency's offer. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. OFFER Rt:CEIVED Sincerely, I 'n LU N. LaBelle DATE: :V S �7 CJt,,•tw.. CTt.� r);lr /.,lt c p.�,. IU • ►i r Cit Administrator/ Re ei{ t of Offer Uocs Not t y Director of Conimutlity U-!Vcloplcent Constitute Acceptance � SFhlp[ti;4omplete It¢rrs 1 on;: Put your address In the"pEz'U tv rU ar.desir.c.,and complete Items 2 rntt, deli from and the d t tp yaw.-file�¢turr reriaca on tt lehe �vriltyrtriltie yi0u the nar sa p; 11 oevent delivered to and the date of dell%, s mill provrrnt his postmaster or,t�at rson and Beck ax as�or oddItia n;s¢rylcu(s�nt;oeiup, jai are a�ai+'°•—Consult I O'Shaw to whom dolilared,dale,and addratsea's addnttt•3.An1cl , 2. ❑Aestrictcd dailvary. o Add�„d MR. JACK L. GOSNEY • q'AnkleNumber P.O. BOX 23 P 471 698 867 RANCHO SANTA ri;, CA 92067 Certified ofs¢rvictt: """"`--- iste Insured �express Mail cot) 'Always Obtain sipneturo of addressee or 8.Sign We—qd r Ce, �•• agent and DATE DELIVrnEb. 1 ?C —•. — '^�\ a.AddratJO¢'f Addtett rO I,}'if —A ant 0.SI atuf --� rtyll'Wrd gild feeIuldJ X l v ..... . Q 7.Dare or D¢irvvary Jr. r0. , r. DOMESTIC IIETURN RECEIPT •1 r 1 SMIMARY STAT1111INT PROJECJ': MAIN PIER REDEVELOPMC;IT ARCA PARCEL REFERENCE: 24-153 -12 DATE: D1,CE BER 3, 1987 ONNER(S): JACK L.GOSHEY PROPERTY ADDRESS: 406, 408A , 4081 . 410 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, IlUIJTINCMN IWAC11 LI:CAL DESCRIPTION: AP11 24--153-12 - FUI L LEGAL TO POLLOU ZONING: SPGCICIC PLAN 3 'TOTAL AREA: _8,25'1 SQ. I'T. 'TOTAL TAKE: 8,250 St?. f i'. PRESENT USE: COMMERICAL IMPROMIENTS: BRICK & STUCCO COMMERCIAL BUILDING This approved offer is presented in settlement, of the acquisition of your real property (including improvements) us follows: SIX HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR 711OUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND NOJ100. . . . . ..DOLLARS($684,500.00) The: valuation of your property is based upon an analysis of recent sales of comparable sites and similar properties in this locality with consideration to its highest and Lest use. Where applicable, the potential fair rental for your property fins been considered in the analysis. Current construction costs have been considered in estimating the depreciated present value for any improvements on the property. 7'he offer is the full amount believed by the Redevelopment Agency of the -City of Iluntisigton (leach to be gust co►►ipensation for your property interest. Any decrease or increase in the fair Market Value of the real property to be acquired prior to the date of valuation caused by the public improvement or project for which the property is to be acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such improvement or project, other than that due to phyaical deterioration within reasonable control of the owner, has been disregarded by the Redevelopment Agency in malting their determination of the fair market valuer of such �I property. PAIR MAIcKET VALUE, as used in the valuation is ... . .. .the highest price on the date of voluarion that would be agreed by a seller, being willing to sell but under no iarticular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obligated to sell, and a buyer, being reedy, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing. each dealing with the other with full know).edge of all the u::es and purposeas for which Lilu property :s reasonably a►Ir,?ti►ble and available." (SUCLion 1263.320 Code of Civil Procedure). Determination of just compensation does not reflect any consideration of or allowance for any relocation assistance and payments to which the owner or tenant is entitled to receive under Title II of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Neal Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 or the Redevelopment Agency's agreement to pay certain settlement costs, Iaer;y.:"�;y.7.... .....1.. �.... a ... .. .. .... . .. .«.... ... .. .. . .....r.. ..Ll•.Ts•.•. .«...�....».s.-....r . 1 1 WIN 11, 'r' 4L PAGE 24_! A F� ASSESS • AVENW Bo' AA ry •� 73' M c :r GG, • �` C ! � • � zss 7 8 y y ?3 16 17 Nis• H IS ,rof + 320 is 8 671 4 .r• �s b 9 8 T 6 5 4 2 / i+ as• a 90• a ! ! !i5 ii 6 15 t ts• :s' ca• IYw �., — j� �1 f r t Get ` J O�+n�/'- J i4c.�t �-• has�e ,,! Fes, 6.49A� c 35-l3 11. .�.Q�i. A• 28 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION /A/ RH $8-19 ON 7�-S_9 �w. �D'r'` Date ...�._.,..J�,,,�T:,-;;,�,g� Submitted to: 7-0 1- fa- Submitted by: Chairman and Members of the redevelopment Agency ��'t Paul Cook, City Administrator, Chief Executive Office7r -` Prepared by: Douglas Le Belle, Deputy City Admininistrator/Community Developmect Subject: CONTINUANCE OF RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR PARCEL 02 3-12 (GOSNEY PROPERTY) Consistent with Council Pn!;cy? PQ Yes ( J Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachment STATE NT O IS511 : ' At your meeting of May 16, 1988, regarding the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity on parcel 024-153-12, (which is the Gosney property located on Pacific Coast Highway in the Main-Pier Phase lI subarea), it was your action to continue this noticed hearing item until July 5, 1988. MKOMMENDAII-0N: Staff would again recommend a further continuance of the noticed hearing for the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity an parcel 024-153-12 until August 15, 1988. ANALYSI Agency staff, since the initial scheduled hearing on this matter, has been In contact with the property owner regarding the acquisition of this property and we are currently awaiting the completion of an appraisal by the �?operty owner. A further continuance until August 15, will allow time to conclude negotiation efforts with regard to this property. FUNDING SOURCE: j Not Applicable j ALTERNA11VE CTIO : I 1) Continue to another date. PEC/DLB:lp 3662h J NO ism ,l r EXHUIT A The real property proposed to be acquired by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach is located in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, generally located at Pacific Coast Highway between Main Street and Fifth Street, Assessor's parcel number 024-153-12 and more particularly described as Lots 4, 5 and 6 Block 104 of the Huntington Beach 'Tract as recorded in ;Miscellaneous Maps, Book 3, Page 36. r WAI-NUT AVENUE rQr• . , s.•,s ao' 6 7 B W ' 23 AR) h Ps 23 H h �� » IT. _ 2I ._.;� /9 3 '` is ' 7 , 17 I 16, ' / 5 5 _ ----- Z� ' /4 1 9 10 9 0 7 6 s 4 P / a:• t Z I 12 I Z I 1 (14D C 16 4 15 :a' • rs• rr• PACIFIC COA57" HWY. q . � pw i (MI N{ara, CA 921I ,{ i lin► ch r, i Unn hrri I Ih►ttor►, Ci by (It Lorr►rny P.U. Poic 2740 P-000 Nnin 9trr+rt itur►t i rinton llrnrh, C.m rorni n 9r rh7 Dr-- v. hi I l►t t t or►, 1 .•arm ri I inn n w►'i ttnr► rrtl►►n tt to arilinnr nt tl►r Mn►-ch 20, 19afi City C:omiril mr.•rtinn nttnrl►nd notion. ►.�rr1� y,�rr, � tl i •111 :It L. 1711slIFY i i i 7' �.�.. •... .♦ .1. ♦.... .. .. •r .. .. _ ... ... r.. .. ... a.y .�,...tr.r�l••.ry,.,� ... ••IS�.�y 1R7 '"T? • •III.• .•r'r ►/•) r�1 �.: �••,•,;;�.,. .r11;r;rrc:v r,Ir'rc1l:rlr:v mmu mmu smEr i ••! 1111NI1tWION MACII mironrllA 921141 VAIL 1111f IUN It t.rrtlpNE r.Ily rtth•rr!•v 1110 53GASS W" "at 19, 1 "88 r'1;11'I'J !'1 !;I► IIALL WE'1'UK11 I1Kt'I':1PT r1r. . ll:tc�1. Lr`r�uclrtl c.1►:;rs:,'!, P. W. 11"m 23 IIa i It--1'i r`T I r11Nni•11I. r'1 At r pa rc'r' l 11"mhyr : :''1 • l t► l I 1 4UH--r► ltl Pavi ( i c: Mani. II i tJ11wa 1►r`ilf ►'rttllr•t ( y ltlirlr?r : 1t•,' 1::! t t`r tl,s!.rtl !:U :ens!lt,I ' , ! t11i I In Hunt 7t1/11 `all I1Q nr:h 1►��rintln 1r►11lllntl( Itrinllt'}' t►( ( r�Yr`tI I t1 purvhaat� your pr'operLy references: i11t1�1't�. COl,'t i'rl (Ale '►t i '.lt "aI rtt fr•t Its( L► 1 '•.t► you in toe ed. Us:: Kim was t'tI jor•k"d q"d rtltt di ::t'nsri "nm and I.:'•L "L l at: i o"n Lo date hays` ""I. her" Suecr':;t'1111 . I')torPI or yrtlt nre horvhy Ibis_ i I i r`►f LI1O 1 he Hun i nyLon Beach Itotrevo 1 opment Alter vy will consider adUltt i Un Uf a re noluL i on of "vue:;s: i t:y Lct ,Iglu i rr your ltrnpet t y by condemnation at a herring LO I;r held r►n March ?tl, 19OU aL 7 : 00 p.m. Q t-he council Chambera, "a 1 I , 7.U1►U Main SLrceL , Hunt. i nQu" 11pach, California . This hrrring will "UT c'nnt' m Lhe price to he paid for Lhe l►roper 1'y . 1 r;r:nns nppr"pr i al h I'm d i ncuss i on are those dua l lnrl WiLh l►tlltlie 1nLrres:t. • .1nt1 ner."nKLy for yrtur property, and W, Agency '" right LU ac quirt' your IwoparLy by condemnation VUrrUnnL j In ,;crM i+sn 1140 .03" of the California code Uf civil Procedure it copy of which in al-Lilt'h"d her"t.tt I "r ynut convenience . rico i c e : You have ra r 1 qhL to appear and hu heard on the matters + rc`I'erred Lo in such C.C .P. Rocl. i.Un 124U .03U . If you ;I Wish La al►lIr?rar at the hearing and he heard, you should Me 1e a wr i.Lte" telluesL within 15 days of the elate A thin letter . Your failure to file a written t 1?t111esl. Lo appear and be heard within 15 clays alter the date. of Win "Wen A I l res"IL in waiver of the right t.t► apt'Lar and I)a heard . • .,� '+475���'�6F�«1��"•I.0.1�1.�fye��i�Y.l.. Itr. Jarl; botmard i,vhruar}' 19 , 191111 Page Two Add i L i O11:1 l l y, }'011 ^I1(;il 1)1 1:(' ;idv i:;(_,6 that W(` r(!Il a i 11 ready aL ally File Lu riatLer . 11qu"ry ALLorhey 611:c h (!C: Mr . '110'. Gos-livy, Jr . 11. (). It!);( i 13ti DO M •. , cA 9210'1 Sl ,'11111ard Oil C1). Ar(.11llr Ile Na Vr)*a i i 'I l� I ;I f 1 I I REQUEST PC`� RE EVELOPMENT /w-03ENCY ACTION APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL �.19JU July 18, 1988 Date c v c eKx Submitted to: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Paul Cook, Chief Executive Officer I Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Comm. Dev subject: AUTHORIZATION TO FILE ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER Consistent with Council Policy? to Yes ( J New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: S.TATEMENT OF 166 An entitlement application along with supporting documents are being prepared for the development of the property bound by Main Street, Walnut Avenue, Olive Avenue and Third Street. The Agency does not own all of the parcels in the block and therefore it is necessary for the Redevelopment Agency to rive permission to file the documents. RECOMICD_ATION: It is recommended that the Agency authorize the filing of the entitlement application and supporting documentation. The City/Agency rlong with a major land owner control the interest of the majority of the parcels of the block in question. However, the City/Agency does not hold title to all the parcels as we are still in the acquisition, process. Section 9801.4 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code states in ,part ". . .entitlements on properties within Redevelopment Project Areas may be filed by the Redevelopment Agency without the consent of the property owner provided, however, the consent of the property owner shall be obtained prior to any development. " In order to process the application in a timely manner, it is desirable for the entitlement application along with supporting documents be submitted in the near future. Ti-1110 SOjI�tCE: Not Applicable AITER�IA'i'IVE ACTION: Do not authorize the filing of the entitlement application at this ; time. This could result in a substantial delay of the project. DLB:DK:jr (0919d) P10/1/85 r � y REQUEST FOR RED ct � T A%,. ENCY ACTION RIi 86-17 K� etrX out Date February 20. 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Ir Redevelopment Agency Members Charles W. Thompson, Chip Executive Officer e,w--( Submitted by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Rodevelopme Prepared by: Subject: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION/PROPOSALS - LAKE STREW F:'tPERTY Consistent with Council Policy? 21 J Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: e- STATEME14T OF ISSUE: In February of 1985 Request for Quail flea tion/Proposals were solicited for the subject property. Later in 1985 an Exclusive Right Agreement was prepared regarding this property, but did not result in a successful disposition of the parcel. Therefore, at this Itime staff Is recommending that proposals once again be solicited for its disposition. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached Request for Quail flea tion/Proposals for the disposition of the Lake Street property and authorize its distribution. ANALYSIS: The Lake,Street property consists of approximately 2.41 acres on Lake Street between Indianapolis and Frankfort Avenues In the Agency's Alain-Pier Redevelopment .Project Area. The site is currently zoned Old Town Specific Plan District 11 Area and under this zoning could accommodate approximately 82 multI-family rental units without benefit of a density bonus. The site was originally acquired by the Redevelopment Agency from the City of Huntington Beach in 1983. In February 1985 the Agency approved the solicitation of statements of quail flea tion/proposals from developers interested In acquiring and developing this site. Interviews of proponents were held in March of 1985. however, In June 1985 the Redevelopment Agency voted to table consideration of the disposition of the parcel until a futttre date. As the Agency continues to move forward with the Implementation of redevelopment plans within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area, It becomes more evident that development of this site can provide a significant contribution to these Initial efforts. Disposition of the site at this time will provide the Redevelopment Agency with lease revenue or sale proceeds which may be used to fund other Improvements within the project area. Development, of the site now will commence a tax increment revenue stream as well. Unlike othe!- proposed developments within the Alain-Pier Project Area, it is believed that upon disposition of this parcel It could be developed without any financial assistance from the Redevelopment Agency. P P10/1/65 RH 86-17 February 20, 1996 Page Two Since disposition of the Lake Street property by the Redevelopment Agency would be a revenue generating activity and substantially support the Implementation efforts within the project area it Is recommendc1 that the site be disposed of at this time. FUNDING SOURCE: Upon disposition of the site, Income will become Agency revenue. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not approve the attached Request for Qualification/Proposals. 2. Recommend changes to the Request for Qualification/Proposals. ATTACHMENTS: Request for Qualification/Proposals with exhibits. CWT/DLD/SVlCtajh 2019h I J ,y i 11.YS....,..i1i b..wa«r+-.-.: ...�..-.....w-.w. ..,v......-�....+.-.._. ._.. , .. •. .. .... . ,..... �. �.... �........w...eu..a KM•L. +4. M+w• r..... .. K."b.K� L oRncc.rTD V-017C. Request for Qualification/Proposals Lake Street Parcels- Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach is soliciting Statement of Qualifications and Proposals from development firms Interested in the development of publicly owned parcels located on Lake Street between Indianapolis and Frankfort Avenues within the Agency's Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. The site is 2.41 acres in size with approximate dimensions of 800 foot frontage on Lake Street and a depth of 132 feet. This site Is within walking distance of the beach and the Municipal Pier and Is composed of two currently unsubdivided parcels and a public right-of-way which will be vacated. The Redevelopment Agency will entertain proposals for the purchase of the site or the long-term lease of the parcel (not to exceed 55 years). Additional information regarding the site is as follows: 1. CURA.&I ZONING: Old Town Specific Plan - District Two Area (potential 65 unit:, without density bonus); .-- 2. SITE LOCATION'AND CONFIGURATION: See attached Site Plan and vicinity :nap note development contraints shown on Site Plan); 3. BUILDING SITE CONDITION: Site is currently developed with an abandoned fire station and the site.will be sold or leased in "as is" condition. Demolition and removal of existing improvements Including street paving within the vacated right-of-way will be the responsibility of the selected developer. ' 4. FINANCING: Pending the outcome of federal tax reform legislation the selected developer may be an eligible participant In tax exempt financing. 5. DEPOSIT: The Agency will require a non-refundable deposit at the initiation of a 60-d9y Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement. The amount of thL deposit will be $25,000 which may be applied to subsequent lease payments or purchase price. 6. CONTENT OF PROPOSAL: Please see sfAmple format for responses as attached. Interested developers should submit an original and five (5) copies of their submission to.- Stephen V. Kohler Senior Community Development Specialist City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5542 THE DEADLINE FOR THE RECEIPT OF RESPONSES IS: FRIDAY, MARCH 280 1986, 4:00 P.M. TO MR. KOHLER �j 0450H f 1 Request for Quail flea tlon/Proposals Lake Street Parcels - Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Bench Is soliciting Stoical nt of Qualifications and Proposals from development firms Interested, In the devi .,!ent of publicly owned parcels located on L+aite Street between Indianapolis and .rankfort Avenues within the Agency's Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. The ite Is 2.41 acres In size with approximate dimensions of 800 foot frontage on Lake Strev and a depth of 132 feet. This site is within walking distance of the beach and the hlu elpal PIer and Is composed of two currently unsubdivided parcels and a public right-of-v by which will be vacated. The Redevelopment Agency will entertain proposals for the purch a of the site or the long-term lease of the parcel (not to exceed 55 years). Addtt[ona information regarding the site is as follows. 1. CURRENT Z ING: Old Town Specific Plan - Dist ct Two Area (potential 82 units without dLN sty bonus); r 2. SITE LOCATION A D CONFIGURATION:. See ttached Site Plan and vicinity map note developme contraints shown on Sit'Plan); 3. BUILDING SITE CONDI Ns Site Is 2urrfntly developed with an abandoned re station and the site w y sold or le sed in "as is" conditicn. Demolition and removal of existing,Im vements�ncluding street paving within the vacated right-of--way v(i111� the ponsi ility of the selected developer. 4. FINANCING: Pen9ng the outcom of federal tax reform legbl&tion the selected developer may be aXaplied p Sli ipant in tax exempt..flriancir�g. 5. DEPOSITS-The Agency will nondablec cAsit at the Initiation of ��yExclusive Right toe Agr ente"The amount of this deposit will,bi $25,000 which may b to subse ent lease payments or purc�hese price.6. CONTENT OF PROPOSAL: c sample forma for responses as attached. Interested developers should submit n original and five (5) copies o heir submission to: Stephen Y. ohler ,,•'Senior Co munity Development Specialist r'! City of ntington Beach 2000 Ma Street Huntin on Beach, California 92648 (714) 5 6-5542 THE DEADLINE FOR THE RECEIPT OF RESPONSES 1S: FRIDAY, MARCH 28, 1986, 4:00 P.M. TO MR. KOHLER 0450 H 1 ' SAMPLE Lake Street Parcel Proposals Hunt�ton Beach Redevelopment Ageney FIRM NAME: ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: Please attach information on firm's previous experience, financial status, and local references (references will be contacted). Include photos of other projects containing product type similar to that proposed. If to be Leasehold: PROPOSED LEASE TERM: PROPOSED LEASE PAYMENTS: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS: OR PROPOSED PURCHASE PRICE: DESCRIBE TERMS: (include proposed length of escrow) t PROPOSED NO. OF UNITS: PRODUCT TYPE: tinclude rental or for sale, approximate unit size and bedroom mix, type of construction, number of stories) DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: FRIDAY, MARCH 28, 1986 4:00 P.M. 045011 • I 1 • 1 i 1 • ' 1 . { i { 1 1 1 , 1 1 NOW-a 1 { IVA-Y4, 1 1 1 • i . e ' JOY SrK?: ,t .3141 1w rn i 4U1r114ts NM IG CTIONAI DISTRICT MAP i I-6�1 I a{arq yur. • •ra{ w.►n.wr•ir t.t. t{YKM {aMra.Gf •{ IIr W /.A•.y V•+ CITY OFmum .. .mp al .�•►.�ray Y1rV• ��G•�1.YIYt M� ....0 .� w =w•wrw. t.' NMI.•Y.1 Y60 M••4• T �« w +r �• jr n .w..w•r•aw r1•.+. I �'�TI GTO B E ASH It. "� + "'a j] 'wG w.•wr w...tww rl•..• ..w •M � rw ..•tr Y••.w rrrr w.••• •1•Y— 3'•i 1N .•.. /r.r.•rrrrl/.+nwsrr.�w•. t� COUNTY. :3 i. .•'.�' w �w •�i i i1M rrr.•/...�/a/a/laav/ra.•w•..^RANGE COU TY CALIFORNIA ..r " " :��.•� w • • M.rb r•1' awl/ • .« �. YM.A Y..//aA/r1•.r• Ir .00-00 •taw• MY��•irU...�wM~r� tom... M....r11�Gw�M1G.►11'r.•.I.• / 1 Y Yw .A J i.w 14 7Q 3S: �.1 ••.• ..• =wS •••• arm. o••w••w•w r. •tA Y �yM11►'•1• U t tL—j I t 1 1 1 .•1 1 I....—.J t L, 1 1•ww.»/•..r 1. L. {�.r•. .1��.RI-0 RI .1 R•1 1•R= jY.i•� "�• CZ 1 .+ •` ,yet RI AI AI Al RI A C{ •O t+sv .w ' _. aft imm — I — r�•. „► 1 �'��h11 •0 .0 1 uurlucr 11 �I t'► ' 1 t ;y RI AI RI Ri Al A •0 �p w ••r 1 1 s CF-E Al RI i •o -o -o -o -o o i :rt .{111 i RI RI ULD '+•t�' .1 a ..' 1 . r. .+. 1t:: , / Ca.�}� 11 i • • III RI t .• V T �I ... .�~ ` i 1 1 -"'• CF—R -0 i FLAAI\ f�N, r M►r r rM CF—R AI 1{ IRS CIO �• AI ► yr 1 Al R! • � A! RI r •w� . 1 FW +r•�iria'wt it .. 1 113 43 431C/4 ! ► 1 r I ��t�1 1 �f ` • ,� . 03 A3 i1,,i.,,,,jl WE �� ..•• •� ' 1 MH qn Nrl- do •// .a l� 1 1��.�.� �.{*,ter laic ID am • i . ' I ' REQUEST FOR R DEVEL0PMENT AGENCY ACTION . RIi 86-3 Date January 22, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency 61 bers Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Offi Submitted by: QiJ ,yf Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopme t y� �'��'�c ' I1 Subject: MODIFICATION OF AGENCY RESOLUTION #48 � i+L► '1616r Consistent with Council Policy? ( ] Yes k1 New Policy or Exception tPJ ffl,L Statement of Issue, Ra Alternative Actions, Attachments•commendatinn,Analysis, Funding Source, STATEMENT OF ISSUE: p Agency Resolution #48 was .adopted by the Agency in September of 1982..and .wa ' subsequently modified by Agency minute action cha jing the sixty percent (60%) requirement to two-thirds (2/3). Resolution #48 sets forth the parameters under which tho Agency's, powers of eminent domain will be utilizeI to acquire property for Redevelopment purposes. During the negotiation and implementation stages of projects within the Main-Pier Project Area the two-thirds requirement, as it has come to be known, has had the resultant affect of being a major coostraining factor to the Implementation of projects within the Main-Pier. As a result staff lips prepared for your consideration a Resolution which will supersede the provisions of the original Agency Resolution No. 48 and the Agency's subsequent minute action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the attached Resolution #I&. ' ANALYSIS% Since. the Spring of 1084 efforts have been underway to negotiate and Implement disposition and development agreements for several projects within the Blain-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. In each case the developer has been required to prepare a plan and seek the approval of two-thirds of the land owners by both area and parcels before a disposition and development agreement that requires the acquisition of properties by eminent domain could be executed by the Redevelopment Agency. The result of this action has been to place undue emphasis on existing ownership patterns. In itaff's analysis the major governing factor should be achieving the desired land use for the site In question in concert with enhanced economics. With the two-thirds requirement the controlling factor In terms of support tends to hinge not upon the benefits of a given redevc-lopment project, but rather the realization of a perceived land value. Plo/l/65 `��.1`!i�"ti.r_t...�.iJ: :.i._i: .. ... r . .... . .. .. .. . .. -... .. .....�.._.._.... __............. y.. .:�.. .r•.Sr.i..a::mlv S'....-.7;'yi'i�`:s»t.Y� i .. RH 86-3 January 222 1986 Page Two The new Agency Resolution # 3 will not remove any of the owner participation requirements under the previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules nor any of the requirements for a critical cost benefit analysis on a project-by-project basis by the Redevelopment Agency prior to a project's implementation. It will, however, assure developers that once the mutually desired land use plan Is arrived at and tested from a cost benefit perspective and the deal points of a disposition and development agreement mutually agreed upon that the Agency Is prepared to move forward with all property acquisitions as appropriate to assure a project's implementation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Do_ not approve the attached Resolution and continue Redevelopment Implementation efforts utilizing the existing provisions of Resolution #48 or modify Resolution #48 In other ways. FUNDING SOURCEt None as a function of the adoption of this Resolution. { ATTACHMENTS: ` Resolution #� Resolution #48. CWT/DLB:ajh 1843h ' I I IM������ i �' MAIN PIER MIXED USE PROJECT ��sS1D (V— �SCuSS14N City/Agency Cash Flow Analysis Beginning Net Ending Balance Revenues Costs Balance (000) (000) (000) (000) YEAR 1 ($2,350) $1,051 ($779) ($2,078) 2 ( 2,078) 1,216 ( 862) ( 1,724) 3 ( 1,724) 1,356 ( 951) ( 1,319) 4 ( 1,319) 1,495 (1,026) ( 850).• 5 ( 850) 1,597 (1,070) ( 323) 6 ( 323) 1,759 (1,112) 324 7 324 1,897 (11159) 1,062 8 1,062 2,005 (1,206) 1,861 9 1,861 2,125 (1,257) 2,729 10 2.729 2,180 (1,311) 3.598 Notes: 1. Project costs are $2.35 million one time costs, Transient Occupancy Tax for 10 years, and 770K' of the Property Tax Increment for 15 years. 2. Project revenues are 10061 of the Property Tax Increment revenues, 100R of the Transient Occupancy Tax, Sales Tax, Ground lease payments, par- king revenue, less the revenue generated by the existing uses on the property. Source: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. August, 1985 w. - w �IQTIQN REQUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL Date February 13 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members ~�P1 E L�" CiTI• C O UNC1 Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy Director of Redevelopme Subject: TRANSFER OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND A LOCATION TU ---._ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Consistent with Council Policy? ( ) Yes K New Policy or ExceptionAs, �, 9 / .© Y Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Statement of Issue Before the Redevelopment Agency may issue securities to finance publicly-owned facilities within the Main/Pier Project Area, it is necessary to secure sufficient industrial development bond allo- cation for such financings. To enhance the dollar amount of such allocation available, the city may transfer its unused 1984 allocation to the Redevelopment Agency for use to finance projects during calendar year 1985 by adoption of the attached resolutions. Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Clerk to execute the attached resolutions. Analysis As part of recent revisions to the Tax Code, It is necessary for the city or Redevelopment Agency to show sufficient industrial development bond allocation before financings for private or publicly- owned facilities may be.undertaken. On February 6, 1985, staff received notice that the time within which the city may notify the state of California and the Internal Revenue Service of an election to "carry over" unused 1984 IDB allocation had been extended to February 25, 1995. . At present, the city's entire $9,360,000 1984 IDB allocation is unused. Transfer of this allocation from the city to the Redevelopment Agency will make such allocation available for use by the Agency to prepare and sell tax exempt securities to finance publicly-owned projects within the Main/Pier Project Area during calendar year 1985. Since the dollar amount of public Im rovements Iecessary to facilitate the implementation or re- development efforts within the Mainypier Project Area are substantial, the preservation of this 1984 IDB allocation Is of critical concern. It is recornmended that the city transfer this allocation to the Redevelopment Agency specifically for the use in the financing of a publicly-owned and opera- ted parking structure within the Main/Pier Project Area. Without this transfer, the 1984 allocation of nearly $10 million will be lost. However, with this transfer, this allocation may be used in con- junction with the city's 1985 allocation of $9,3601000 bringing the total allocation available during this calendar year to nearly $20 million. 1 1 Alternative Actions � Do not approve the attached resolutions. This will preempt the use of the city's 1994 IDB allocation during calendar year 1985 and limit the amount of public projects financed to $9,360,000. f L� t PIO 4184 i I' -2- i Funding Source Without approval, capital formation for public projects will be limited to the 1985 allocation of $9,360,000. Attachment Resolutions Nb. , YJ-2 and CWT/SVK/DLB:pj i P I I fir;... . �.. •.x: ..... .�,.. ., . ,. .. . , .._ ..�.... .._.,, . . :.,,_ , _.__.-. .. .. __ _�__._.. ._.._ . .._. ._ - IN THE Superior Court op THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PRQOFOFPI_131,11'. TiON RELEASE OF FUNDS ivo'f)cxTl]Pt»�tw1G*� YURtItRRIIiAilCO/f11lfRiAiRI . nnTtcsaaumrr+aarflorxra'�trrr>�t.-t �:;, State California )y ATTRUR R TRECIl"YCLMAMINK AY Countyy of Orange ) Clrtd Hwuaroo Hnci MW DARLENE H. CUMBERLAND H "f"0 a `b cAsas<ls TOALLINfYJG1SfRAAGENCi&�CR011FlANt)PCJt90f�'k Tba d gbh H etkt?ato Idttttity as Actm to ba Tabs by tie Ctt 1.r at' That 1 am and■tall lima herein mentioned was a citizen of L pa cc iboat %.w7tl.tf�s,Lt*city aH�'"WhOWrpit�" Allta'• the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that 1 taa4 sad 124%n fbrekVar fat IKUDi b r I - -iadred No&, am not a party to,nor interested In the above entitled matter; vada 7uls t dtb W-4 sail C+•tewud1Y Dnvkp M Alt of ts711PL a-M that i am the principal clerk or the printer of the tar W* ' No Awl 1%}fk7b I ur"of this Pr*0 it to nvb Sk MWA ehndi- aaa pease hc+w s W"bard strrot to a woty anti hvrd uIWL HUNTINGTOR BEACH IND. REVIEW Impateerardauasardtd to-AdcstiadeurbNr mmk adForwalwW, aommwo tSa errstsd tire+tWke.Tir�tsoisti alto esat ter t�vwd�' a newspaper of general circulation.published in the City or aced the mWAutim dv tnrtk�tt iilliiee__cart II l40_ Mrw t11n.� •' WPM TUN W"of t'W&am*Hvii j,axah of 0"Aruq%w1 ofTbkt!wwwdt"tdrrtbettttt It twn druratnod gild wh r.gwd l Moat t d tech#rill HUI>iTINGTON BEACH IL It mt is okow County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the cacti aaipsifkaauyafls+tifyt6aqudityd6tsaasasrfroonawas+�etroediasb diaemination of lorasl news and intelligence of s r•' tiarsc• �D1 A`m'd IGtwt Rartpirai W dreadtd att a g- ltsp�tgtataaaatesdtttialtrails#tdt3arirratoettalPoatyAaartvartfLt+..1tQ1. ' ter,and whia newspaper at all times herein mentioned had AM NOON for PA6KitDiaaattapt�p�aseistauNpid sall>At'.r.Uw• and still has a bona ride subscription list of paying subscribers, to tie It bra teptar�datars>wi"*�Pra&t artor,3 l ' and which newspaper has been established,printed and pub. ��o��� �=WM' b Iwtsd to so Pape t{teificaace a strn il�'tarka'1 rrwircoa.e++cdd b farl.'J1r wbjrrl• lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange fora vlr.abradMstwtM.1,tbadpw�arwrau.akri..r.7acr..uJbraa� period etceedin one ear, that the notice, of which the esr�r�tprciw a tole own wA%m nfs p+sjKt rno Wh rkW3 Pe K Y NestCAELaaf(artttrhiY fwtdattpst'larsdeeaa ud anneentire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement by W zed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular As iueritveawut Hatrrr Ramd tat gmM*n prajart bw boo riw r ' and shots sao�t 4HatttblNw •Mick daatasas do srtriaaraaW! ' •'tttirw d tit pn+Xct rseo r'fir aw FrtA tb nstoss riy ar!sratasrM Is sal. thereof,on the following dates,to wit: nariari.TNi FAmm nand Rrm.Roastd b w dw at d»&W"atleeus sad is. an"*ix pudic ass bttl.sire °` � VM nq" a W Hur1a glee#•' b.r.+rawew.rlttmAx,oe>Kaar`-M. •. _. , .•• me to"es.kuswsw at rid jro d ii PIPMi to be"Wosnit January 319 1985 crierletupaer.tfan)rrwaf�FaNd�'I�,- e AN kuewad rpet+n,Poop or k01�diraeMb�t'%'Ibs Mid' art tntRd M nbratt t►rMtaa tetstaasta fat sosaiurratl ta.lttr►aatatatt trisi .. rtnlrtis4EKAWratlsnalaarhaterarsiltrrylf.lat�Aslatitlastawrvu: , nrakw A W ooarYlrnd,aced tea t�ty d iJuauytas Firar4 eW Yt tapwl W; niwn of Frdetd iardt oe tail.airy srlLr as U a=PW- ?"isHUp'e. wriWtsrtWritNimbwi..�t►sda .,. •t �:+• t)01tbC11(Mt<T0517)t i, .' t. t, TM OF d He tAn Aw h to ow kite W ttwnibtd sbsir 0M. P1 i Gran Nola M I Aodr b w HUG tadw 71tw!"(tlrr rM IRI TIa Ono, ' i certify tar declare)under penalty of IKrjury that the forego. d Haas Pearli M NIA)"tu Ckr.'lisscYlitas amb aoi' Ing Is true and tx+rrect t udde W.Thmr�^is tus cwtow as air Arl�k mmm,aaaw.t w�" accept tile.*Wk"'d Im laded motto it as odlee is Mw¢t to t AWa Dated at............ tlwr b nit"b strtranaaar wrier,itridat trod sad r ....GARDEN.GROVE............. tilt thew *M bwa saiYfbd. wra'M lit ' b, that apes to appeal was Orm Amda wr et�tnm*2 bm w k%d, la►wparib7ntra rails tie NGUNNl rmiroaoetal Ad of ISM HIM■A t California,this ... ?.,day of..Jan. I9 8S secceerrppti es nbpttioa a Mt appewd of ter rakme of halls 0imptesa ri tbt rsru4atbs mh r a i as on d tie foaatebrj Asia W last asMJehteiw WWI cal la trt ntrtaaA y W t)O►cva a aWe tiliaet d • 'aar�pp¢r�srt�d r by 1it1R w Al girt W. art �,r4tYrb�it tiPP►*V t ...DARkENE•H•:•CUMBERLAND........... tttdketw mitaSat.d a d.rrlat .� to 04 in. tie atrstaaeiftW ro+frw Ixedaa objoshm aw. papaad sail oAiLu it at.pstacad0ft WMi dA 14— Peoeodtew sedn 24 . 8"nt 1l71 d Y►tsterer Signature Rbw towed is W rtda—.1 RMWs"W Ad I%IW_Tb"cK+L!vrr an' -I&Vh In W On of the t71y 6111traCh*tM 13M&Tlsy aory be W9ty tta to WrmmmUi la now Oftw,Us Q+partwoo of RmV4 ad Urbav lh"bp, maat'm W&W"Eottlarml,to A pk%e4warh gal..'••..i Otktb=b MUD as W tateut W Mils os Maw a!n Wes 4*%i nand is W pr rioas VW eat W A-A00 W 1h Ruck 14 oairtkwt rorwwd cltrr }' I va bo taarLitead by HUD. C2�srka 7lorapr+a ' CittAlawmatrr � , PuAJaturyOl ste6 . HUM.SW%tit III#.XMW . �•� d4� CE'li'Y OF 1.1[DNYIIi1GTt9P,1 BEACH ENTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �It3 ,J� e- • 1 flLhtlYGiUYfI�(►1 � ��'� L�/1-h� To Charles W. Thompson From�2 dTom Tincher, Director City Administrator Business & Industrial Enterprise Subject CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION Gate June 6, 1983 l ON TALBERT--BEACH AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS As we have been moving -thead rapidly with implementation of the Talbert-Beach senior housing project and with the plans fort. the Main-Pier Project Area and its proposed amepdment, several elements of these projects should now be presented to the City Council for �ansidpration. Regarding the Talbert-Beach senior housing'project, the I' proposed tax exempt bond financing will soon be finalized and, as you know, the Arroyo Group is quickly completing a set of proposed recommendctions regarding the future of downtown, I` Is may suggestion that these Iwo principle and several related items' could be `com- ' biped iti a single City Council study session In the near future. Further, I would 14i:e to suggest that this special study session be convened: Monday, June 27, 1983, 4:00 p.m. At this study session we would intend to present the current status of pions for both they Talbert-Beach and Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Areas, and the particulars of the City's participation in the tax exempt financing far• the Talbert-Beach senior hau:;ing project. • It is particularly important that we determine the Council 's opinion regarding the structure of this senior housing finance prior to authorizing Stone & Yo.ingberg to prepare the complex and lengthy financing documents which will be pre- sented to the City Council in approximately 60 days after authorization to proceed. For these reasons, may I ask that you ascertain '-he pleasure of the Council regarding a special study session on these topics on the above referenced date (or some other convenient time) at the Council 's regular adjourned meeting of June 6, 1983. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. TT:SVK:jb cc: Jeri Chenelle i ' A - I �. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA 83-9 Date February 18, 1983 Submittd to: Honorable and City Council Members t Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator PMwad by: Office of Business & industrial Enterprise Subj&- PROPERTY EXCHANGE TO ACQUIRE LINDBORG-DAHL SITE St oment of Issue, Rm*mmendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 4y.i1 On February 7,ki983, the City Council. approved ,the property exchange with .Lindborg- Dahl, and authorized the City Administrator; City Attorney, City Clerk and Mayor to draft and execute the appropriate documents soIthat the necessary conveyance of property 'could "occur, and authorized the expenditure of necessary Housing and Comnunity„Development' Block Grant funds to •carry out the transaction. As we�pro- ceeded With finalizing the agreement with Lindborg-Dahl , it became advantageous to the City and the Participant to make an adjustment in the terms of the agree- ment.. While the initial transaction'proVided .fall compensation�to'ibe Lindborg-Dahl. Company"far their expenseswincurred as part of, thy' Str Lake . eet project;-thrdugh the conveyance."of additional,:property asjpart of, the Old Public works Yard site, it was preferable that,Lindaorg-Dahl receive reimbursement and, in fact, an up- front cash settlement for a portion of their costs rather than 'the compensating exchange in land. While this approach will result in approximately $12,000 in additional HCD funds being expended upfront, it will result in savings to the City and generate additional revenues in the future. RECOMMENI mori: Approve the revised terms of the agreement as,depicted in Attachment 1, and:au".horize the expenditure of an additional $12,000 in HCD funds to cover additional upfront costs associated with the transaction as described above, and authorize the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Clerk and Mayor to draft and execute the appro- priate documents to implement the project t ANALYSIS: The initial :terms .of the proposal called for the resubdivision of the Old Public works Yard site into nine 30' parcels and the exchange of those parcels with the Lindborg•Dahl Company for its equity portion in the.Lake Street site. This trade reflected compensation to Lindborg-Dahl for all previous expenses which it had incurred in carrying out the Lake Street project and a commitment on the part of the City to assume or pay off the balance of $450,000 of the mortgage which Heritage Bank holds an the site. Subsequent to the Council approval and further negotiations with Lindborg-Dahl , an agreement has been reacht,: whereby the City No 4/11 . L RCA 83-9 February 18, 1983 Page Two 1 would resubdivide the Old'Publ'ic Works Yard site into seven 30' parcels and-one 33' parcel and exchange said eight parcels to Lindborg,-Dahl with additional compensation coming 'from the payment of approximately $16,000 in reimbursable fees and a $14,000 cash settlement to cover other expense, This approach will generate upfront cash to Lindborg-Dahl which they desiv but most importantly, it will reduce the City's overall costs to acquire 1 the site by approximately $45,000. FUNDING SOURCE: 1. Housing and Community Development Block Grant Fends previously budgeted for land acquisition purposes. i I ALTERNATIVES: 1. Maintain original agreement which results in additional overall costs to, the City. i TT:lp attachment i , i I i 1 I~��Ys_.':�K.:.:.-K,A,.{w.y.�"i. e...l' .... .• ..4.,.^...w.i....�...wv+.�`V,.�w�. '4:. .J'. ..... _.._..�. .11.—TK.L4�.L�j".A flM�l f —A& r ATTACHMENT 1 it of H untirig tors Beach City P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92M OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR February 16, 1983 Leonard 0. Lindborg 17720 Newhope Street, Suite 226 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Mr. Lindborg: This -letter is written- as confirmation of our agreement of ` February 14, 1983 to exchange, property owned by you for property owned by. the City of Huntington Beach. The exchange. will be your Tract• #9388, containing 15 lots located oa Lake Street in the City of Huniti'ngton Beach, for lots #1 through IS of Tentative Tract #11933, located on Alabama Street in tae City of Huntington Beach, commonly known as the old City Yard. ram, TERMS: - Lindborg to deliver Tract #9388 free and clear 'of 'all encumbrances. - Lirdborg to. pay normal escrow and policy of Title Insurance fees. City to deliver lots #1 through #8 of Tentative Tract 111933 tree and clear of all encumbrances. - City .to pay normal escrow and policy of Title Insurance fees. - City to deposit $•480,000 cash in escrow, minus .$161090.70 refund for unused fees which will take place outside. of esc::ow.• - City to give Lindborg two year option on the four remaining, adjacent lots at old City Yard property at $65*000 per lot. - City to- pay interest on Lindborg outstanding loan of $400,000 on his property held by Heritage Bank at the rate of 16 percent per year or $177.78 per ; day if escrow not completed by March 41 1983. - Escrow to be opened at Orange Coast Title Escrow and .to close on or bei( re March 4, 1983. - If escrow fails to close, due to the fault of Lindborg not being able to deliver clear title at the agreed closing time of escrow, the City would be released from this interest demand payment until tattle can be delivered. �. T-leiihnne 011) 536-5202 i r •' 7 ' �. • N • i " 1 G ! Leonard O. Lindborg page Two ! • City to provide letter concerning possible pending condemnation of Lindborg property. If you have any questions, please Feel free to 'contact Dan Brennan at 536-5267. Sincerely, Charles h1. Thompson City Administrator Pkiink B: Ar ue11a s Adting City Administrator CWT:FBA':DB:cgs h. r• - }fir• 4 t 1r �•4e. "•'y'R'+i:, }^•��!��•�r'` 'a .._....t.... :w"'L.=,.i:..►iw w..-..w.. J.'Kr." a:Ur.n..•--�---`-.-�.._.._r.-r.rre.►wr.ae�wiy+ats+. .Y�OrM•I'`iNr..*'+7:1•,wA�•M•r rYHti+i.-i:..•.7'r+-. .. - ., ' A lrj-j� . , #:ITY CIF HUNTINGTON BEACI��• 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CALIFORNIA 92648 September 29, 1982 Mr. Lee A. Branch Cob ity Recorder County*of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, California 92702 Dear Mr. Branch: I Enclosed is a description of the land wi�thin '�the plain-Pier Redavelo ment Project Area and a statement that redevelopment proceedings have been instituted under the-California Community Redevelopment Law. Please recol and return to the Office of the City Clerk. d We also have enclosed a copy of this letter with aself-addressed stamped envelope to returned with the recording information. p Sincerely, DOCUMENT NO. 82-352337 i. ' RECORDED: Alicia M. Wentworth OCT . 6 W City Clerk ` AMW:f b enclosures: statement legal description 17010hanr•714.596.5?271 i I -ti. • ^ 82-352397 C EXEMPT C5 When Recorded, Please Mail To: City of Huntington Beach RECORDED FREE PER GOVERNMENT 2000 Main Street CODE SECTION 6103 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attn: Alicia M. Wentworth PRECORDING BENEFITS PROVIDING FOR REDEVELOPMENT AREA of OVA"toug".M901141A .4.oo PM OCT b '82 DESCRIPTION OF THE.LANO WITHIN THE MAIN-PIER A.BRANCH.C000ty Reowd* REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA and STATMENT THAT REDEVELOPMENT '. PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED Proceedings: for.''the redevelopment of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area have been instittited.under the California Community Redevelopment Law pursuant to a Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted September 20, '1982 by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach by Ordinance No. 2578. The description of the land within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area is attached as Exhibit "A". Date: September 29, 1982 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk i r.�,..�1:.C9. -•.......,w.. ....s�'.^+.:_'s:K.r.,..•..x ......_....�-..Ewan.,.:7':.'.>w........:s-.,..ras.r,�-...........,.>..r-- ...�w,.a..a+srwr-....++� " r Exhibit 'All LEGAL nrSCRIPTION MA1h'-PIER RED IArEWI';�-N7 PrkoW. r AREA ` That portion of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California as shn or on a map recorded in hook 3, page 36 of AJiscellnneous ;Lips in the Office of the � Count), Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Like Street shown as Ocean Avenue and First Street respectively on said rn.entioned rnap- thence along the centerline of rdcific Coast: Highway South 480 21' 42" East 37.5 feet to the intersection with the southwesterly extension of the southeast line of Lakp Street; thence along said mentioned extension South 410 38' 18" hest SO feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being distant Southe.�tit 4ti`� r"ast 1655 feet along the southwest line of Pacific Coast 11ighuay to the intersect ion Frith the southwesterly extension of the northwest line of Sixth Street; thence continuing South al° 38' 18" West S25 feet more or less along said extension to the High Tide Line of the Pacific Occati; thence northwesterly 910 feet gore or less along said High Tide Line to a line parallel Leith and 35 feet southeasterl%• • treasured at right ankles from the southucstzrly extension of the line of t-hin Street as shown on said KV) of Iftnitin9turi iicach; thence alizng raid mentioned parallel line South 410 38' 18" West 1470 feet to a line parallel wit!, ;Ind (;o feet southwesterly, measured-nt right ankles from the southivestcrly end of the 11witington Beach Municipal Pier; thence North 48° 21' 42" West 145 feet along , said parallel line to r, line parallel with and 3S feet northwesterly measurod at right angles, from the southwesterly extension of the northwest 1:.nc of Aklin Strc": : } thence North 410 38, 18" Last 1470 feet to the 111g?i Tide Line of the Pacific Occ..::; thence northwesterly 6r;0 feet more or less along said 11igh Tide Line to the sotitlnvesterly extension of the northwest line of Sixth Street; thence along said � extension and northwest line of Sixth Street North 410 38, 18" East 1035 feet more f� or less to the intersection with the northeast line of Walnut Avenue, being 60 (j feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline, said point being distant North ; 410 a8' 16" East along sfiid northwest line 510 feet from the southwest line: of Pacific Coast Ifighw.1y; thence along said northeast line of 1tialnut Avenue South ' 480 21' 42" East 1330 feet to in angle point in said line, said point also being; on the southeast line of Second Street tieing ' :eet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence continuing along said northeast line South 100 09' Oa" Cast 414 feet to the southeast line of Lake Street:; thence along said southeast line South 41° 38' 18" West 254 feet to'the Tnje Point of Beginning. .1 i 82-352397 ti STATE OF CALIFORNIA J SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On September 29, 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared Alicia M. Wentworth, known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. f Witnessed my hand and official seal. OTFIC1AtSE�.L ') 6"f�::'%IIAY CON.�!E A. t o tN3TA�t rJ-i,� u,pil'Ai+ �t o`'�`tar�Fuu c s gnature p�r,rtL'E tt- (Notary MY COMMISSION E)"'S Lr:T 10 1985 Connie Brockway* Name - Typed or Printed) (Seal) Notary Public in and for said State OFFICIAL SEAL CONNIE A. BROM AY A a NOTA T MI:IC • CAUlO►NIA n Fu'IFAL OFFICE 1tt, }� 1 O)< NUE COUNTY M� YCOMM 5 UG"f,10 1985 _. ,....-... -- ..... :...:.. .u�...-.t.a•:........a4.�'1C IKt7KZ:tTi�3'.' -xL�r�rp,� e i NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Huntington Beach 1416 Ninth Str-et, Room 131 2000 Main Street Sacramento, California 95814 Huntington Beach, California 92648 County Clerk County of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, California 92702 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or i 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Project Title SCH #82052809 Tom Tincher (714) 536-5542 State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number Main and Pacific Coast Highway r'ru cct l.ocat on ---� Redevelopment of Main-Pier Area Project Description _... This is to advise that the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, as "lead agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EI R and record of ro c . P je t approval may be examined at: � 2000 Main Street x _Huntington Beach, California 92648 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. LI' 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project. y' Date Received. for Filing: om nc ier ((, Director, Business and Industr al Enterer se c: City Clerk r 'Z't�+.I�E:I:.::.'3:C"..+.w.+-•--�-.... . ...�ram...,..w-._.. .. j. I PRELIMINARY i DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE MAIWPIER'REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT May, I9a2 i - t i �+. _ .+........�.,+:r•s•::t•�..�.ts;.,....r.a...:. +gat+o:.res.+.�a.;s-:,:.:.i�:".'«..:«F.�.3t✓�a�-..................:�+...�,.+,r....'.i�i:..!'.=«'Ti+.i. (�.�y� r. �Y j . TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0. SUMMARY 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3.0' EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 4 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION 5 j MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS '5.0 ALTERNATIVES 14 6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFES 14 CT 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 15 0.0 GROWTf i INDUCING EFFECTS 15 9.c IN"IG-Unc ANT EFFECTS 16 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 16 APPENDIX A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 17 APPENDIX 81 INITIAL STUDY 1$ k • tc f: ' I '•�'r'fCt3T•ai...�G"'"S.tti..vc r..w..+.........s.+.r,:nr,++x..•ta•:air.....:r.........w•.r:.•.:...�::...Li'::. ....'=uu.:.e....r...,�•. r..+..•�+.+••,•...-+r.....r ,r Ln SUMMARY r The proposed project consists of adoption of a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the 30-acre Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the plan Is to remove existing blight and improve the physical and economic well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, it owners In these parcels are desirous of participating In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for a-hner participonts) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired.,at fair market.value, (2)• Initiating such negotiations as noon as practical both prior and ;subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced. and are qualified far,benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and,sufficlent time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's;progress 1 and its activities. Although the Impact 'of relocation could be negative, ,Its long-term Impact Is expected to be positive In that relocation will afford businesses and residences in the Project Area a.unique opportunity-to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash' resources. The Impact from project implementation.;on surrounding neighborhoods Is also expected to be positive over the long term. i Construcilon of modern well-planned public, commercial,, office end residential f developments will provide an economic and aesthetic Impetus to the surrounding .areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting Influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will 'afford substantial benefits,to the community, over the long term, it Is possible, that In the short term exleting neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from hoavler truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these Impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive Impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modem and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. As presently envisioned, It Is the desire of the . Agency to construct approximately 300 new residential units and 190009000 square feet of commercial and offices. The total value of Improvements could exceed $150,000,000. Rw:'.'-i^3`s:6'w'�'.a:R�nM:., ... ..... .. .,. .. r... _ ._... ..... ...._• ......_ .......-. ......r. ...... .......�_..-........ n..rs. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of commercial buildings and . existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately 25 residences and 40 businesses. ' The precise layout of new development, displacement phasing and level of activity Is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted If required by C.E.O.A. The generalized Impacts of an additional net 300 residential units and r net 1,000,000 square feet of new commercial/office development Is discussed In further detail in this report. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION } 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) hae been prepared pursuant to j the State EIR Guidelines for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Plan. This EIR 13 intended to provide decision makers with useful information on the impact of 1 the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to adoption of the plan by- the Hunt ingtan'Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken in Implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plan 'will be subject to further..environmental evaluation in accordance with the Califnrnta Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 2.2 Prolect Location The proposed project Is located In the City of.Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile' southeast of downtown Los Angdles (refer to Figure 1). The proposed } Main-Pier Redevelopment Project as. selected by the Huntington Beach City Planninq Commission consists-of 'approximately 30 acres as shown in Figure 2 and as legally described in Appendix A. 2.3 Project Ob ectives As outlincd In the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the objectives are: Eliminating blighting influences, Including deteriorating buildings, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, inadequate public improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve the overall. appearance of existing buildings, streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings, new and old, are safe for persons and businesses to occupy. Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Afea to participate In the redevelopment 2ctivitles, thus sustaining the existing*commercial base. t Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to -encourage new .construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. -2- ut t ----------------- - ax.•aaaa ( ti i0 An. • ! ~ •3{. h r IC �� ! i �• ♦----- a•. sQi.•�M a CtfuYf fn• a+.l..a s 6aaisw•f .r•.•r ==+..a• . • p to ♦ '• u. ae...•t.w p Q • Q is ! .� ;• aw.ra •�•-• • cstto It 7 O 73 •.i i..•.« •wfwsa .� � •i or.c• t LDS AMLELES • Cou '• .t ` . — 7 p OL•ann QRAyGE tOCJPITY yatr4 ! elm cl 1� p 4 91 aa- tot ••.. ��..�+.... r0 ram...-..•sr►.falaa paraY Nap•O �1-f . '•.a Cf.T.a a.•f•f •tasasa•� { aYf•7a• .•ot ��• { Muow nest. t tacit 0'��9 { I stay ' a•'• t. t e►L.. •' g 22 - � �1i rf••c !�. i- �a TwT.a � low VICINITY MAP ! of TO HUNTINGN BEACH �fwrTac 1 � s .... � s�� 1!�s��sra�f+�a T�lii�a�i a�� • -� � f Acme w..T dwir c - 9 20 • ar or r fast', sas ��ara����l1�r* s��sstl =Kea sw� now MAIN - PIER REOEVLOPMENT PROAMAREA FIGURE 2 r Mitigating development limitations which have resulted in tl,e lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that they constitute a serious physical, social ' and economic burden on the community which cannot seasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelnpcnent. Providing construction and employment opportuntles In the development of these facilities and by providing employment opport•-mities In the operation of the propused publlr% and commercial facilities. Implementing the construction or reconstruction, of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain tha Proje::t area as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for. the permitted uses within the Project Area. In accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. 2.4 Project implem-ptation ' To implement the proposed project, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is proposing the following activities within the Main-Pier Project Area; Acquisition and sale of property. i Participation by owners, businesses and tenants through the Improvement of their properties or through other opportunities to participate In this or 'i other redevelopment projects. j Relocation assistance to displaced residential and nonresidential occupants as required by law. f - Development of better parking, landscaping and public Improvement ( concepts and facilities. I - Demolition, clearances of properties acquired, provide public Improvements, building and site preparation. - Other actions as appropriate, in^luding, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants in the Improvements of ! their properties to carry out the objectives of the Redevelopment Flan. i 1 i -3- I 41 ! r The land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities and building Intensities and standards which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: ' 2.4.1 Land Uses - Commercial. Principal uses would include visitor-serving retail and office. - Residential. Primarily high density residential uses including condominium development. Community Facilities. Reconstruction of the City pier, public parking, street improvements and park areas. 2.4.2 Principal Streets Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street system, Local street improvements or vacations will ba made for each particular development. 2.4.3 Population Densities Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 25-35 dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. 2.4.4 Buildinc intensities i All co'iinercial, office and residential uses throughout the Project Area shell conform to or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Basch Municipal Code and the final Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. � j 2.4.5 standards Minimum standards for the Project Area . it:clude current specifications for publ ic is works construction, building codes, zoning and subdivision regulations and all other applicable local, county and state regulations. 2.5 Project Duration Eurept for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions,which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this plan shall be effective and the provisions of • other documents formulated pursuant to this plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent Domain proceedings shall be limited to 12 years from adoption of the plan. 3•0 LXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing environment for the City of Huntington Beach Is well documented in the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington Beech Chamber of Commerce Community Profile, the Huntington Beach Miscellaneous Historical Dato.and several previous environmental Impact reports all of which are on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. -4- ww.wyr..w. "f r ' r ' t i 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS This section of'the Focused Environmental Impact Report will examine the general Impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific impacts of the type of development/redevelopment that is presently envisioned by the Agency. As previously indicated, individual projects that are implemented over .the next several years will be subject to further environmental evaluation in accordance with C.E.G.A. 4.1 General impacts of Redevelopment As stated In the Preliminary Plan for the Main-Pler Redevelopment Project, the general„impact upon the residents of the Project Area and on the surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1) blighted areas will be replaced or ' rehabilitated, (2) relocation of businesses and residents when necessary will bs In compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) there will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. The proposed development will result In the loss of existing opan land. However, as described above, this loss would not constitute a significant impact as the development will be consistent with present zoning and the anticipated uses will be beneficial to the 1 community. in addition to these items discussed in the Preliminary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneficially impact the Project Area by: 01 - Providing additional decent,. safe and sanitary housing to the existing stock"within the City of Huntington Beach. - Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the •'. City of Huntington Beach with a stronger economic base. - Mitigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack 'of proper utilization of she Project Area to such an extent that It causes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development of new housing and commercial facilities and by providing employment opportunities In the operation of these facilities. :T Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate stroets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted reuses within tha Project Area in accordance with modern competitive development practices. i , The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, if owners In these parcels Are desirous of participating In. the project, such participation will be encouraged in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired, at fair market valuer', (2) Initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of.relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and Its activities,,. (6) establishing s business retention program. Although the Impact of relocation could be negative, Its long-term Impact is expected to be positive In that relocation will affnrd residences and businesses in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice 1' with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal or business, cash resources. The Impact from project Implementation an surrounding neighborhoods Is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development + of modern, well-planned commercial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting influences will be Irradicated from within the Project Ates. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, it Is possible that in the' short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive,Impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In de alopment of modem and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic, vitality of the i. City of Huntington Beach. + * erminent Domain Law (1263.32D), fair market value of the property taken Is the ' highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being milling to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obliged to sell and a buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing,-each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available. When the Agency purchases property, it usually will pay cash. This is of additional benefit to potential displacees when compared to today's "creative financing" type of transaction, where the seller usually ends up receiving monthly payments on a part of their equity. Sellers usually have une additional year to purchase comparable property before they are required to pay capital gains tax, because most redevelopment transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. -6- 1 .....�..-..., ....,r..,..-....................__._ ..--....� .... r._. .. .. . . ,..., ...,.... . .. ..__.�......._........_. _...«.r.s i.nun.r..uc`yyr�...a.rnw.r.rasrowr..�• i . i 6 The proposed redevelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the Implementation of the General Plan and its goals and objectives which have guided the development of the City since its adoption. 4.2 S2clfic Im nets of Presently Envisioned Redevelopment Activities As presently envisioned, it Is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the construction of, approximately 300 new residential units and to assist in the creation of approximately 19000,000 square feet of new commercial/office development. The total value of Improvements would be approximately $150,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing buildings, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately 25 residences and 40 businesses. The precise location of new development, displacement phasing and level of activity Is Impossible'to;predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, Individual environmental evaluations will be conducted as required by C.E.O.A. The genaralized Impacts of an additional net 300 residential units and a not 1,000,000 square feet of new commercial/office development can be summarized as follows: *Residential - 300 Units 10900 vehicle trips per day Increase 500 parking spacesincruase 45,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase 58,000 gallons of water per day Increase • 11000 pounds of stolid waste per day increase �• 130 potential maximum student increase *Commerelal/Office - 1,000,000 Square Feet - .4000-vehicle trips per day increase - 2:750 parking spaces Increase 709000 gallons of sewerage per day Increase - 100,000 gallons of water per day Increase 5,000 pounds of solid waste per day increase A population Increase of 900 will probably require the addition of approximately 1 fireman and related equipment, 1 policeman and related equipment, may require additional educational facilities and may*require the addition of sewer and water facilities. Many of the costs for providing increased services could be provided by the Redevelopment Agency. It Is anticipated that substantial changes will be required in the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and In the solid waste management system. The proposed project would generate about 3,000 pounds of emission per day. More detailed Information will be required prior to Implementation of Individual development projects. * Estimates have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associates using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. ' ..,yyl'.Ct...-Zy.....w..t..r.r r. •. t' ".1.. .. .. . . +. •. .«. .».. .. . . .. .....,....� --... ._-•..r... ....,.�..-..�- t Although it is Impossible to project specific activities, It is presently envisioned that Agency assistance will be required to Implement up to 300 residential units, and up to 1,000,000 square feet of commercial/office development. Removal of 25 residential units and 40 businesses will result in a substantial amount of solid waste which will require disposal. This waste material will probably be taken to the transfer facility and then trucked to the Orange County Landfill. 4.3 Mitigation Measures The,proposed Redevelopment Plan Is a means to mitigate the impact of blight In the Project Area and Improve the social, environmental and economic conditions In the City. While the project is beneficial, minor advorse Impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered at this stage of the redevelopment process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed In accordance with provisions of the Uniform Building Code which gowns construction relative to seismic movement. Onsite grading and earth removal will be performed to the satisfertlan of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosion of soils, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the proper engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No unusual mitigating measures beyond the regular controls of the City arc proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Air As mitigating measures, the Agency will encourage improved circulation, the extension and Improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usage, energy conservation, bike routes, paths and open space and green areas. . 4.3.3 Water Development as proposed by the Reduvelopment Plan will create an additional 1 ; demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher IntErssity development may require expanding capacity and improving local street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a more specific indication of actual site development plarri occur. No specific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. i 4.3.4 Plant Life + , i � The project will remove no significant vegetation since none is In existence. : Landscaping will negate the impact of providing an urban land use on currently vacant and redeveloped property. Landscaping is anticipated to be In excess of City standards. _$_ -......r........,.........._.�_.. _.._-.._...._..... .. .. .. ,. .. ..____ . .. »... ....w:.. :'r..•:isi-eC,.fir.,:-�ii.LCY�*eiw�'u4+�+•-� l I� rr 4.3.5 Animal Life The Project Area is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. Landscaping of the Project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhance a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. 4.3.6 Noise Noise levels In the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to Increase significantly. Normal construction of building is anticipated to provide a minimum outside-to-inside attenuation of 22dBA which will reduce the Inside noise to a level approaching 45dBA. No additional mitigation measures beyond the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City'a Noise Ordinance will be required. Noise from traffic within the Project Area will lie reduced because of Agency/City Impravementa to road surfacing, traffic control equipment and removal of mixed land uses. in addition, Implementation of Section 27160 (a)of the California Vehicle Code for auto and truck manufacturers will result In a decrease In noise levels from engines and tires; by 1987 all vehicles must be at levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 Light and Clare Landscaping will "soften" the visual impact of the postAble light and glare resulting from•the redevelopment of the Project Area. each redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers forcapprovalin aby the Huntington Beach RedevelopmentAgency will also exercise sign control and architecturalncu trot od the ver thecnlowTdovelohe p ent In the Project Area. 4.3.8 Land Use r`s, . As previously stated, the land uses of the Project Area are proposed to be redeveloped to mitigate blighted conditions. Existing residential development transition zones" which reflect greater compatibility of uses will'be buffered from proposed commercial developments through "development te any . Potential conflict from adjacent uses. to mitiga ,�+ 4.3.9 Natural Resources #` Wherever feasible, existing ntructurgs and improvements that are scheduled for demolition will be recycled to conserve on the consumption of natural resource. 4.3.10 Risk of Upset No significant hazard of explosion or hazardous substances is anticipated. No r mitigation measures are proposed at thin time. ) _ 4J.11 Po ulatfon . 1 It Is doubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantial! g p to the City. Y great enough to create a significant adverse Impact -9- r ,= • w 4 With regard to the displacement of persons and families, relocation assistance will be provided. Relocation Assistance. The Agency, shall assist all businesses and persons including families and others) displaced from the project by the Agency In finding other locations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences and businesses be necessary to carry out the pr,3ject, persons and businesses displaced shall be assisted by the Agency in finding decor:., safe 9nd sanitary building3 and homes; within their financial mean4, In reasonably convenient locations; and as otherwise suitable to their Needs. The Agency is authorized to provide housing inside or outside the+ Project Area for th)se persons displaced as a result of redevelopment acti-lties. Relocation Payments. The Agency shall make relocation payments to businesses and persons (including families and others) displaced, by the project, for moving expenses for whieh'reimbursement or comperaation Is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will•reirnburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred in the ,. )le of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those: eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make every effort to relocate businesses, individuals and families within the City of Huntington Bench. Temporary !relocation 'Housing. The Agency Is .authorized to provide temporary relocation housing on cleared sites within that Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, staiidard and decent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prior to permanent disposition and development, of such cleared sites. If feasible and desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites outside the Project Area for providing relocation housing resources. The Agency is also authorized to provide temporary relocation housing in hou:, , acquired by the Agency that are being held for sale and/or rehabilitation. c4.3.12 Housing. Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to, they Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall bu used b the Agency for the purposes YP Y 9 Y P P �i of Increasing and Improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined in the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined In Section 410679 unless one of the following findings are made: That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would j benefit the Project Area to improve or Increase the supply of housing for fi persons and families of low or moderate income households; or i -10- t That some stated percentage, less than 20 percent, of the takes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 is sufficient to meet such housing need,; or - That a substantial ef fort to meat low and no Income housing needs i In the community Is being made, and that this effort including the obligntion of funds currently available for the benefit of tho community from state, local and federal sources for ow. and moderate (atoms hodsing alone or In combination. with :he taxes allocated, under this section, Is equivalent in Impact to the funds otherwise required to,bo set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of Ic+,v or moderate Income cr very low incoule households from within ar adjacent to the Project Ares, because of increased employment I Plemeiitation of Oftunitlest or he ause Redevelopme of any nt Pi noth . direct or indirect result of 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation Redevelopment will assist in providing adequate interior and e clrculaflon to serve the Project Area which will result in Improved traffic flaw and provide improved access and additional exterior Parking' anti other mitigating devices will be necessary sary tloeacclammodete the anticipated inn-rease In traffic flow. 4.3.14 Public Services_ No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. ional manning of such services as fire protection, building I pe tlons, anddpol ce protection, etc, will be necessar now exists. y to maintain the same level of service that . 4.3.15 End I The' following energy ennservation mcasures are recom structures: mended fur the new Use of as much solar and alternate energy as Is feasible. i. Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. Electric 11911ts should be strategically placed to meximixe their efficiency. Their size and power •consumption, should be mint much as passible. mined as Electrical'heating in public and private structures should be dis Solar assisted heat;ng systems should be encouraged. couraged. - Reflecting and/or Insulating be used In struct windows are not shaded by exterior should architectural projectionsuors mature Plants. -I1- ` ..mow.. .. -.,.,,+• - �. ....y....r....a. ........-.... ._ .. 4.3.16 Utilities No mitigation measures are proposed nt this time. 4.3.17 Human Health No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, it should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be improved by being relocated into housing that is decent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.18 Aesthetics Architecture and landscaping site plans will be approved by the City. - Incompatible Uses. No use or structur3 which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor or similar factor would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted In uny part of the Project Area. - Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels. Parcels In the Project Area, . including 9ny parcels retained by a participant, will not be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. - Limitation of Building Density. The number of buildings in the Project Area will be consistent with building Intenuities permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. - Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings. The height, type and size of buildings shall bo limited by applicable state statutes acid local zoning, building and other applicable codes and ordinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codas and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. - Open Space, Landscaping and Parking. The approximate amount of open space to be provided In the Project Area is the total of all areas which will be in the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the' open space around buildings, and all other amounts of outdoor areas not permitted through limits on land coverage by the Plan to be covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where new construction occure shall be submitted to the Agency for review and approval to ensure 'approprietenuss and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets and public and j private parking shall be provided for In each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time. Any private streets or .off-street parking must also comply with regulations Imposed by the Redevelopment Plan. Llcjit, Air and Privacy, in all ereas, aufficient space shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air and privacy. i I •12- i - - t Signs. Signs which create hazards or unsightly P-Ovarance by protruding, - over ranging, blinking, flashing, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted in the Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and i approval. 4.3.19 Recreation No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.20 Archenlogical/Histocical Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified Individual will be retained to investigate tho significance of the hams, catalog and remove same for further study and preservation. No other mitigation measures arc proposed. 4.3.21 Development Standards New Construction. All construction In the Project'Area shall comply with all applicable state, and local laws in effect from time to time Inca«ding, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, hosting, grading, plumbing, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. Rehabilitation and'Retention of Existin Confoirming Uses. Any existing structures within the Project Area which meet the standards for rehabilitation may be repaired, altered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, if necessary, in such manner that will meet the following requirementss 0 Be safe; sanitary and sound In all physical respects. o Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington Beach. 0 Shall conform to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. 0 Shall be comparable in appearance to the architecture of the on-site proposed new structures. 4.4 Unavoidable Effects The proposed project should improve the community's overall economic situation and, as a result, bring about more job opportunities, Increase population and provide a higher quality of life for the residents 0 Huntington Beach. These factors, In turn, will place a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, power and land resources, as well as contribute to air and noise pollution. i -13- `i `.�_-�.�n�wYrnr w+�w. �..�.... ....r•...w. ., . ....• w.... .�...... .. r r �.�,......._rw.w•...N'fJWllWbhwlMTA iM.'.^oN'TVRiI-?YSAIY . t • i The Implementation of the Plan will result In the clearance of selected commercial and housing structures, the construction of now m;iiti-family housing and commercial buildings; the pavement of streets and additional parking lots; and the development of other facilities that will probably result in Increased rainfall runoff. During the course of implementing the project, there will be some temporary disruption to normal activities due to construction. Construction, as well as tha provision of public Improvements, will result In the utilization of certain natural resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum and lumber. Implementation of the ! acqulaltion of certain property and the relocation of ownersand willtenants. result in the 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Project The "no project" 'alternative would allow the Project Area to LvntinuD in a blighted condition for an Indeflnite period. The application of existing federal, state and local funds Is not adequate to significantly prevent existing deterioration or to significantly Improve existing conditions. 5.2 Smaller Protect Area Designation of a smaller project area will not achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan or eliminate the blighted conditions. 5.3 L�r Project Area 4 Establishment of a larger project area would require more extensive Investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not necessarily enhan" the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plans objectives. 6.0 LOCAL SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 1 The Redevelopment Plan provides policy direction In'the establishment of ltind 1 use categories in accordance with the General Plan. The Plan further provides. for the acquisition of property, demolition and replacement of structures; relocation of some families and businesses; Installaticn of reconstruction of streets, utilities and other site Improvements; and financial methods for Implementing the project. The Redevelopment Plan Is designed to provide direction for the transition from present short-term policies to the long-range goais and objectives of Huntington Beach. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective for 35 years. Not to Implemts)L tlia Plan at this time would be to Intensify the conditiona of blight and deterioration that exist within thb Project Area. If Implemented, the Plan would arrest these conditions over the long-term, and would help promote the economic and physical well-naing of the City of Huntington Beach. i. -14- Concern'.ng underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects will be a loss of open space and some resources, which will be mitigated through development open space standards and development of the public park area. The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, demolition, relocation of households and businesses and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the intensity of residential and commercial development will Increase and will result In additional congestion. Noise and air emissions in the Project Area would likewise increase. 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS Although the project will result In the utilization of certain resources such as sand, petroleum and lumber in the construction and Implementation of Its various proposals, and will result in the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, it is unlikely that the Impacts of the Implementation of the project would result in any more adverse environmental changes than would the continued growth of the City under normOl conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the improvements called for In the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed Irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land already committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the steps outlined in this report. 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS { The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as a series of event:. in 1 casual sequence beginning with job creation: The creat`7n of new jobs then 1 leads to job shifts and vacancies, fr:iowed by Immigration and a demand for .shelter. This, in turn, Is followed by an ordering of land uses and a shifting of � the spatial configuration of the labor supply. The shifting of the location of the supply of labor Is a stimulus for the new location 'of business and other � economic activity creating jobs and starting the growth cycle over again. The regional growth cycle constitutes is source of the demand for the construction of private and public fnrilities. The actual physical pattern of tire growth In the City is the result of the chronological order Arid size In which specific parceir of land are developed. The relatively waall size parcels have limited the growth rind development possibilities In the Project Area. The consolidatirit of paresis in the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden the possibilities for mora intense development and growth. ' The ImplementatiGn of the project will have a growth inducing Impact to the City by increasing the population by about 900 persons. The proposed project wiil expand the housing sta^k of thf3 City by about 300 units and will increase employment opportunities. 7 i -15- I 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environmental impacts identified In the Initial Study as insignificant (Appendix B) included primari!y those related to land, wnter, plant and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. These Impacts were dismissed primarily because they ore not affected by the proposed project. 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Pra ect April, 1982, 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency•Proposed Redeveloment Plan, May, I 1 1982. / 10.4 Air Omit Ity I­landbook for Environrnental Impact Reports, SCAG. 10.5 Geotechnical inputs, Leighton-Yen and Asvociates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources Survay and 'Inventory, Huntington Beach California, Archaeological Research, Inc., April 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendments EIR 81-6, Huntington Beat" Dcrartment of Development Services. 10.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate' Planner. ' r s 1 I "_�pendix "A" ("S LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Beginning at the intersection of the northerly line at Walnut Avenue and the westerly line of Sixth Street as shown on a map of Huntington Beach recorded in book 31 page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Orange County Recorder; thence southwesterly along said westerly right-of-way of Sixth Street and its extension' to the High Tice Line of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said High Tide Line to a line parallel with a.nd 35:00 feet northwesterly, measured at right anglesf, from 'the northwesterly line of Main, Street as shown, on said Map, of Huntington Beach; thence southwesterly along said line 1470 feet more or .less V.- a perpendicular line parallel with and 60.00 feet southwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly end of the Huntington Beach Municipol. Pier; thence southeaster".l' ,, along said line 145:'OO feet to a line parallel with and 35.00 feet southeasterly from `1te. southeasterly 1ine.of said Main Street; thence northeasterly along'said line to the, High Tide Line of the Pacific Ocea�nj; thence southe'aster,,ly, along said'Nigh..Tide Line to..th`e southwesterly extension of�the southeasterly line of Lake Street (formerly First Street) as shown on said map at Nuntington. Beach; thence northeasterly along said extension and the sdutheasterly`line of- Lake Street to'the southerly extension of the easterly line of said Walnut Avenue; thence northerly and northwesterly along the easterly and northerly line of Walnut Avenue to the point of beginning. i I , . Ij i I, I' II; I -17- - I --... a•4.w••w•w..r.......�__-...—, ...r... .-.,..... ....., �-.........»...-._ ..... .t.. .Yl'A'• ........--. .._......�.�...-......_.�.-.�......-...«- wr.....w....-w.wr•+r�/w' I 400A u.an camn"UATION SMUT �` ^ .JR HUNG ADMIhIiTRATIVI RRGULATIONS Appendix "B" wim To ucxnARY ap trAT1 (Put/rent to Oanrw*t Cffis$"too 113al) 55. Appendix J is added to read: APPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO; rity nf HuntJognp 13each FROM: ountinston Beach Redevelloament espons aAgency) ' Lead Agency) Agency res3 Mij1 ress -- ( 1• Huntirinton Beach,. California 9264E Huntington Beach,, California 92648 � . SUBJECT; Notice of :Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Reportl'. The,Hunting ton.Beach Redeve�1d"'ment A 'enc y will be the Lead Agency- and will .prepare j an environmental impact--report for,.the project identified below. We need 'to know the vieiwa of your .agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which in germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project . ' v Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project . -x The project description, location, and the probable environmental . .: effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial; . k Study / g is, /�' is not, attached. r Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your respponse must be z sent at the earliest possible date but not later than u5 days after $ receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Tom Tincher at the address shown above. We will neea Ehe name for a contact person In your agency. PROJECT TITLE: MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECT APPLICANT, IP ANY: HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE April 28, 1962 Signature Title Executive Director Telephone •. (Z 4) 5366_U7i j Reference: California Adminibtrative Code, Title 14, Sections 15035, 7,'. 15054.3, 15066, -18- 61/soma O.. 4 +r�ooa �9M1M11iAf1�1M MNN' • WITH TIII lACAUMV OF ITAT1 (hwwir 4 OwKWN"low"11"11) �J 74. Appendix I is ridded to read: APF=1X I ENVIRORNMAL CKOKUST FORM ' (To be completed by Lead Agency) T. BACKAROUND +; 1. Name of Proponent Huntington Beach Redevelo ment A enc 2. Address and Phone um er o opon n s gDQO-Main €g 0. Box 120 d..p...,.....r_...,.._...__ Wigtt3nnatgn ep..arLjQ��fo�r.g?&j1 +rn rrr�rrsw.w.r.r� -- 3. . Date of Checklist Submitted _ May i..�..rr...r......,_._ 4. Agency Requiring Checklist v 5. Name of Proposals If appliaa e Mg{iQ-p/ iAM RPripVal6went elan II, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached Sheets.) ! YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth, Will the proposal rosult in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substrucOres? X $ b. Disruptions, displacements, cos.- paction or overcovering of the soil? dft X� a. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? do The destructionp covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e, Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off they site? t. Changes in deposition or erosion of .beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of A river or stream or the bed or the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? �... _,_, „X �r 400A 4bM11)1UAt10N WIM .,?R FILING ADMINISTRAMN RIGULATIONS ' WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE YES MAYBE NO 9; . Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, � I landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? �. i 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: ` a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? iX ; b: The creation of objectionable odors? c:• Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate= either locally or regionally? rX 3. Water. Will the proposal result. in: IJa. Changes in currents, or the course ' or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X war r rw.. '-` b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterenj or the rate ' .0 and amount of surface water runoff? X �. s ' ' e. Alterations to the course or $ flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to to mperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g, Change .in tho quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cute or excavations? 'I -za- 'o.w QOQA �0�!lMtYA11QM1 M�lR1' t FOR RUNS "MiNIMATM M ULATHM W H THI MWARv 0! ITAT1 IMAM h O�r�CMS M�A�11fM0.1? YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the I amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X f i i, Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X . 14, Plant Life. Will the proposal result 1 n: ;. 7j a. Change in the diversity of species, '.. or number or any species of. plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, cropo, microflora and aquatic piants)7 „X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species j of plants^ ,...�, ,x,,, a. . Introduction of new species of j Plante into an area, or in a barrier ; I ! to the normal replenishment of 4< existing species? ,X d. Reduction in-acreage of any agricultural crop? g. Animal Lire. Will the proposal raid n: a. Change in the diversity of j species$ or numbers of any. species of animals (birds, land animals lntluding reptiles, fleh and shellfish) benthlc or anisms, Insects or miorofaunat? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered apetcies of animals? +; a. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X NaMORM down.` ...... d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? M 400A CO"NUATION SNM POR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE RVOUI.ATIaNS WITH Thl SICRETARY OF STATE (Forty"M Or061wM code 5e01eo 113an YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in% a. Increased in existing noise levels? � I be Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Mot and Glare. Will the proposal produce new 12g7t or glare? 8. land Use: Will the proposal result In a su a antial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resoureea. Will the propose reau nt M a. Increase in the rate or use of any natural resources? X� b. Substantial depletion or any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Mak, of V 'se't. Does the proposal iRvolve, a Him or an explosion or the release of hazardous substances 8 (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides; chemicals or radiation) In the event of an accident or upset conditions? .__.r X� 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the 7 oc�at'�o'n, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human pope- latior, of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal ai rect ex a ng. hodalnj, or create a demand for additional housing? -X 13. Trans portationLCiraulation. Will -the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? X y II -22_ e ore�OOA YOM1'AIYA11dM NMtT fOR FILING ADMINIATRATM INUI;ATIONi WITH TMA SICRITARr of ITATI Ihnrw is Orwrw"CA b&A 1IMI) YES MAYBE NO b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c, Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? r, „rX d, Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? a. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f, Increase in traffic Maarde to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14, Public Services. Will the proposal We an erreoz upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the • following areas: M a. Fire protection? b. • Police protection? Sc. Schools? do parks or other rocreati oral facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of subctant'al amounts or fuel or energy? �.... ..-.. .X. b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development or new sources of energy? a-Now" -23- .wr.r>4JiP..rix*vwe ...4.•.... .. , uy•. t ... .. . ........ .. _.- .,.....�....... ..... .....,.. ._.... .--,..._..—�.. -....-.,....... ..rouay.a+YeYi.['+F7M►tnsuex turU�LtLSK1$��. e _r F� .w 400A 1 COMMON lM1R � ►.A FILIN4 AOMINISTRATIVI RIODUTiO"Y WffH THY SICRMTARY OF STATI ( arr+M MI OwwrM!Cwr Orden 11310.1) YES VAYSI: NO 16, Utilities. Will the proposal result In'a R-R or new systems, or substantial alterations to the j following utilities a. Power or ri.Atural gas? b, Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? f. solid waste and diepyaal? 17. Rgman Heal the, Will the proposal result in; A. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding . ,'rental health)? •�,r X_, ' b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? �•• It 18, Aesthetics. Will the proposal result g in ,tFe o sTruction of any scenic = vista or view open to the public, or S will the proposal result in the creation or an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19, Aeareation. Will the .proposal result in an'Nfaet upon, the quality or quantity of existing recreational oppor*unities? 0. Archeological Historical. Will the proposal result- In an aeration , of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? " ' 1 f 1 -za- " a�w 4t�A• �ONTp1Y�114N f11�1 • rvrrw tHu sKMAN r or 8Yan 21. t 1" 11 an e. (a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the duality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish at wildlife species, cause a fiah or wildlife population to drop bolos self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or -animal community# reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehietory? 16, Due the project have the poten- t WA ` to,"A ahieve short-tere, to. the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is cane ,which • occurs in a relatively brier, definitive period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future,) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but Cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the Impact on each resource is relatively assail, but where the effect of the total of those .'impacts on the anvironment is significant,) X d. Does the project have environ.• �. mental effects which will cause substantial adverse effecta on human beings, slither directly M or indirectly? X III. DISOU3310PI OF Vvno11A MTAL EVALUATION -•25- 7 .....- ..«... _.... .....-.-. ... .11.: .. ... ... ..........�....-«...._...�.......e;ticoa x3:4Gwa::..;�i�s4i3r1i4iCha.^.fLi�. r I ism 4001%• eaentl noM NItIT NCR FILING ADMINISTRATM RMLILATI"S THE SICANTARY f STATE 1M17H 4 (hr�A/oft"N M!Coh W"11SSIM) 'Idoo IV. DE' bMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: L7 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION ( , gill be prepared. ,C7 I find that although the proposed project could have a t significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached eheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. LU I fired the proposed project MAY- have a significant effect on me environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL -IMPACT REPORT in required. Date- ,..A�.r'S1.,.24+..19_._._ G0�1' �-dztr, k gna ur ± Charles W. Thomp on 3 For H n0agtor B ach Redlyelopment Agency , i 4 ••26_ A t MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 . r jF. f J r 1 1 1[1j rts+�+4.'fX effl��MAHiv r1.t<H'Y r.f A'1.:1':;.�:.i,. .'ww.✓..,.«... «...►.... ..rl..:ll. 7'.•, ..e_.... .........-....._.....................►........MMVA�MLCJ�aI'.+•.w+w�....w i 1 1� PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA MAY 19BZ r r I l r+'.Mn[-.�..'R'!.I'Y:l•fAf•[+l.n.w .••._.-(Y_. �. ..•. .....w�...._,.._� .... ., ... .. .'.9a ..........�._ .. .w.r..w..,...•rr... •,•.^•w..• . 'A.AV w+n1q'I•�,OLti�!IM•i*�4•••'•Iwr� TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pn9e 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelopment Plan 1 1.2 General Definitions 1 1.3 Project Area Boundaries 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan 2 } 1.5 Duration of Plan 2 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan 2 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan 2 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants 4 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 5 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures 5 2.3.2 Moving of Structures 6 2.4 Acquisition of Property 6 2.5 Relocation Assistance to DIsplaced Residential 7 and Nonresidential Occupants 2.6 Demolitions Clearance, Public Improvements 7 and Site Preparation 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency 9 Property for Uses In Accordance with this Plan 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 10 3.1 Cooperation with City in 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions 11 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area 12 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements 12 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 16 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed 16 Financing Method � I 3.5.2 Tax Incremente to 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes 17 3.5.4 Loans and Grants 18 3.5.5 Relief ofr Fnancial Burdens 18 3.5.6 Financing Limitations 18 List of Exhibits A. Redevelopment Project Area Map 20 B. Redevelopment Project Area Legal Description 21 f, i r. Js " 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, this Redevelopment Plan Is for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach. This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 cat seq., the California Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area as described In this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council and as thereafter amended. This Proposed Redevelopment Plan Is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on April 20, 1982. 1.2 General Definitions The following definitions will govern In the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise indicated In the text. "Agency" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Fluntingtcn Beach, California or any successor in Interest (e.g., C.D.C.). "City" means the City of Huntington ©each, California. "CIty Council" means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "County" means the County of Orange, California. 'tsq_al Descri Lion" means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared In accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit "B". t "Man" means the Redevelopment Plan Map for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". "Person" means any individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment � Project In the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Project" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Pro ect Area" means the area Included within the boundaries of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project area as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "B". .'. ... .,. ... ... ._. .. ..._., ... ..,.......�.. .,.. ......•,rw„a/xua.�rt �-rwn...�......-._..-r "Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Low of the , State o:` California California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et seq.), as amended to date. "State" means the State of California. "Tax Incraments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency in the mar.;rer provided by Section.+ 33670 to 33677, Inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Lev and Article XVI, Section 16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are sat forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The legal description of the Project Area is attp.,hed herntc, as Exhibit "B". 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency ard/or the City. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plait may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such remedies may Include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, Injunctions, or any other remedies appropriata to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisloi :z, which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property In the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan j Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall f run In perpetuity, the provision`, of this Plan shall be affective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to thie Plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council or until all outstanding Indebtedness of the Agency shall be retired, whichever is later. j 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established In the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereniter astablishud by low. i2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS i 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared Its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and In particular those areas within the City which have become blighted because of deterioration, disuse and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing redevelodp nk efforts the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepare this Plan for the Main-Pier-Redevelopment Project Area. -2- .�_...-.,•...... .........._.........._ .. ..._.. „. _. .._......�... .... _ .. .. . ...... ........ _...__.._..._.�._..._.,..«o«.IU•.TnM.vt'I.v.«):.JFC.i?�a'•f:Aall' i - - 1 Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: -- Eliminating blighting Influences, Including deteriorating buildings, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public improvements, obsolete structures, and other physical, economic snd social deficiencies; improve the overall appearance of streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings are safe for persons to occupy. •- Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants Within the Project. Area to participate in redevelopment activities. -- Providing adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with on unproved economic base. -- Mitigating development limitations which have resultnd In the lack of i proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious Physical, social, and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. •- Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. -- Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities In the operation of the proposed commercial and . recreational facilities. " •- Implementing the construction or reconstruction of the City Pier, public parking, adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm ' dralros, and other Improvements as necessary to eseist development of the Project Area to conform to the General Plan an a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. •- Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area In accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the provisions of tho Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. To obtain the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the ,'agency is nuthorized to undertake most or all of the following implementing a_Alonat -- Acquisition of property. -• Participation by owners and tenants In the redevelopment project. -- Relocation assistance to displaced residential occupants as required by law. -3- ► ` 1 i s j , -- Development. of adequate parking, landscaping, public improvements and facilities. -- Demolition clearance of properties acquired, and site preparation. -- Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited tn, actions to assist properly owners and tenants in the Improvement of their properties to carry out the objectives of the redevc�opmsnt plan. i -.- Assist In providing financing for private and public development In the Project Area. 2.2 Participation by Owners and Tenants 2.2.1 Rules for Participation Opportunities und-Re-Entry Preferences Participation apportunitius shall necr-scarily be subject to and limited by such factors as the land uses designated for the Project Area; the provision of public facilities; realignment c,f streets if required; the ability of owners to finance acquisition and development of structures In acco.dence with the Plan; and any change In the total number of Individual parcels in the Project Area. In order to provide an opportunity to owners and tenants to parts-:spate In the growth and development of the Project Area, the Agency shall promulgate rules for owner and terrnt participation. If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular eltes or land uses, the Agency shall establish reasonable priorities and preferences among the owners and tenants. Some of the fuctors to be considered In establishing these priorities and preferences should Include present occupancy, participant'a length of residency or occupancy in the area, accommodation of as many participcnts as possible, similar land use to similar land use, conformity of participants' proposals with the Intent and objectives of the Redevelopment Plar, ayllity to finance the implementation, development experience and Wtal effectiveness of particiaante proposal in providing a service to the community. Owner participant priorities shall take effect at the time that the Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council. In addition to opportunities for participation by Individual per sore and firms, participation to the extent it is feasible shall be available for two or more persons, firms or Institutions, to join together in pa."tnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. The Agency shall upen the request of any confori;iing owner 13sue to such owner within the first twelve months after tha adoption of the Plan a certificate of conformity In a form suitably} for recordation with the County Recorder's Office. The Agency shall not use eminent I _q- I I , 'I 11 1 { i domain to acquire property owned by conforming owners so lnng as use conforms to Plan. In the event that the Redevelopment Plan Is amended after a duly noticed publir hearing to change the requirements for the property, such otherwise conforming owners ma;' be required to enter into an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event any of the conforming owners desires to conutruct additional Improvements or substantially alter or modify existing ! structures an any of the real property previously described as conformnn% or acquire additional real property within the Project Area, then such conforming owner may be required to enter Into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for tither owners. 2.2.2 Participation Agreements The Agency may require each participant to enter Into a binding agreement with the Agency by which the participant agrees to rehabilitate, develop, or use the property In conformance with the Plan and to w, subject to the provisiorig In the Participation Agreement. In such agreements, participants who retain real property shall be required to join In the recordation of such documents as is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures ) r The Agency Is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve or to cause to be rehabilitated any building or structure In the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. The Agency Is also authorized and directed to advise, encourage and assist In the rehabilitation of property In the Project Area not owned or acquired by the Agency, The Agency and the City will conduct such a program to encourage, owners of proporty within the Project Area to upgrade and maintain their property consistent with City codes and standards developed for Lhe Project Area. Properties may be rehabilitated provided: (1) rehabilitation and conservation activities on a structure are carried out in an expeditious manner and In conformance with this Plan and applicable City bu:Iding codes and urdinances, and (2) whore applicable, rehab"i 3tion is completed pursuant to an Owner^Participation .'.greement with the Agency. In the event can owner-participant falls or refuses to retinal illtate or develop his real property pursuant to this P!dn and an Owner-Participation Agreement, the real property or any Interest therein may be acquired by the Agency If ocouisition funds are available. 0 1 I , M. 2.3.2 Moving of Structures As Is necessary In carrying out this Plan and where it Is economically feasible to do so, the Agency is authorized In Its discretion to move or cause to be moved atiy standare structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area and dispose of such structures in conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2.4 Acquisition of Pr02erty Except as specifically exempted herein, the Agency may acquire, but is not required to acquire, any real property located In the Project Area, by gift, devise, •3xchange, purchase, eminent domain, or any other lawful .method. It Is in the public Interest and may be necessary In some Instances, In order to eliminate the conditions requiring redevelopment and In order to execute the Plen, for the power of eminens domain to be employed by thu Agency to Acquire real property in the Project Area. The Agency shall commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the Project Area within twelve (12) y+:ars after the adoption of the Plan. The Agency In not authorized by low to acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. The Agency Is authorized, however, to acquire private property which, was formerly public property by being transferred by deed, lease, or otherwise to private ownership or contrni before the Agency completes land disposition within the entire Project Area If the Agency and the private owner do not enter into a participation agreement. Thu Agency shall not acquire real property to be retained by an owner pursuant to a participation agreement If the owner fully performs under the agreement. The Agency Is authorized to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which those structures are located. The Agency Is also authorized to acquire any other Interest In real property less then a fee. The Agency shall not atiquire real property on which an existing building is to '.• be continued on Its present site and In Its present form and gyre without the consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires substantial structural niteratinn, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation to asbure that such building Is safe for people and/or businesses to occupy, or (2) the site or lot on which the building is situated required modification In site, shape or use, or (3) It Is necessary to impose upon ouch property any o.` the standards, restrictions and controls of the Flan and the owner faila or refuses to participate In th-c Plan by executing a participation agreement. The Agency shall dnflne the circumstances to which this section Is applicable. ij f -6- dF r The Agency may, In its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real property within the Project Area and the owners of such property will be permitted to remain as conforming owners without an owner participation agreement with the Arr.ncy, provided such owners cuntinue to operate, use r and maintain real property within the requirements of the Plan. However, conforming owners may be required by the Agency to enter Into nn (Omer Participation Agreement with the Agency In the event that such owners desire to (1) construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures or any of the real property described above as ' conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary, in the execution of the Plan, the Agency is atithorized to acg1d e personal property in the Project Area by Eny lawful means, Including eminent domain. ; 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Olyle^ed Residential and Nonresidential Occupants The Agency shall assist ail families, Individuals, or other entitios displaced by the project in finding other locations and facilities. In order to carry out the j project with a minimum of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families In finding housing that is 1 decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, In reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by acquisition, construction leasing, rehahilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing inside or outside the Project Aroa for displaced persons, and to meet housing replacement requirements of state law. 'The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons (including families, business concerns, and others) -1hiplaced by the project, for movinr expenses and direct losses of personal. property (businesses only) for which reimbursement or compensation It =t otherwise innde. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement .-oste incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation t payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations End the relocation provislora of the j Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate existing residential tenants within the City of Huntington Beach. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Site Preparntlon The Agency Is authorized to demolish and clear or move buildings, struOures, and other Improvements from any real property in the Project Area as necesrary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. i. . i 1 -7- ........ .....,y,.._. •,a...:,— ...... .... ,.. ..... . .. .. .. .. ..a.;w.;:ew•..+.w Vany.�wit 31!I j. If In Implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate Income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the i Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, In accordance with all of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. The Agency Is authorized to Install and construct or cause to be installed and constructed temporary public Improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public Improvements may Include but are not limited to traffic signals, streets, and utilities. 1 Temporary utilities may be Installed above ground. The Agency is authorized to Install and construct or to cause to be Installed ! and. constructed with the consent of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach the public Improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project. Area) necessary to carry out the Plan and to pay for part or all of the value ,therefor, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public Improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the Immediate neighborhood in which the project is located, and (2) no other reasonable meuns of financing such public Improvements are avallable to the Community. Such public Improvements may Include, but are not limited to, pedestrian walkways, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, electrical distribution systems, water dlstrl?ution systems, plazas, parks and playgrounds. It is anticipated that the Agency will construct and provide the streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street lights, underground utilities and landscaping within the public rights-of-wa; which are within the Project Area. In addition, It is anticipated that the Agency will assiet in the reconstruction or construction of the City Pier and adjacent public parking facilities. i The Agency Is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property In the Project Area owned by the Agency. When the value of such land or the cost of th-�Installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other Improvement, or both, has been or will be, paid or provided for Initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which It agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. i i i • i I 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency Property for Uses In Accordance with s Plan For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency In authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgaga or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any Interest In real property. To the extant permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to disposs of real property by leases or sales by negotiation without public bidding. All real property acquired by the Agency In the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses 1 permitted in the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. Property containing buildings ; or structures rehabilitated by the Agency shall be offered for resale within one year after completion of rehabilitztlon or an annual repori concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. j The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls In the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, j or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. All purchasers or lessees of property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated In thia Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which the Agency fines as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. Te 'n q 4 rovide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, ► " leased, or conveyed l.y the Agency, as well as all property subject to pez ticipation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the ._oning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All property In the Project Area Is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based eopon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the P,,ojeet Area. All property said, leased, conveyed, or subject to a i participation agreement shall be made expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds. leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, or other transfer of lsnd In the Project Area shell contalri ouch r�ondiscriminatlon and nonsegregation clauses as are required by law. 1 • 4 -9- • To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency Is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other Improvement either within or outside the Project Area for itself or for any public body or entity to the extent where such improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development In the Project Area Is proceeding In accordance with disposition and development documents and time nahedules. For the purposes c f this Plan, the Agency Is authorized to sell, tease, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property. 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Cooperation with City Subject to any limitation In Iaw, the City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take.nny further actloij necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City shall Include but are not necessary+ limited to the following: -- Institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way In the Project Area. Such action by the City may include the abandonment and relocation of public utilities In the public rights-Of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. -- Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and R Improvements In publicly-owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. - Revision of zoning, if necessary, within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Plan. -- Imposition wherever necessary (by conditional use psi-mats or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels In the Project Area to ensure their proper development. and use. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop and provide f for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all reel property, both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan. I Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. -- Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of all building permit, zone change, zone variance, conditional use and other j applications pertaining to land use and development In the Project ! Area. Referral shall ba mpde to the Agency prior to application approval by the City. -- The City Is authorized, but not obligated to provide and expend funds to ensure the completion of the project as a whole In accordance with this Plan. The obligation of the City to perform the actions indicated In this section shall, except for the obligation to provide ddministrative enforcement of the Plan ar, described In Section 3.1 i hereof, be contingent upon the continued availability of funding for this project primarily from tax increment ravenues as defined In i Method for Financing herein. 1n the event that such 'funds, at any time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this project, the obligation of the City 811611 thereafter be limited to C providing assistance In the form of funds necesssr y to pay administrative and overhead costs In connection with tine termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced pursuant to this Plan. -- The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to r carry out the project. 3,2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions Certain public bodies area authurized by stuto law to Bald and cooperate, with or without consideration, In the planning, undertaking, construction, or ? operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of j such public bodies and shall attempt. to coordinate this Plan with the activities of ouch public bcd ea in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, is not authorized to scquire real property owned by public !,odle:, without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, %61 seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. The Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained In the Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or leases property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner and tenant participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. -11- 'r i ` c n During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending Its disposition for redevelopment. 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area Private Uses Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those r►.sidential, commercial and public uses as shall be illustrated from tame to time in the General Plan of the City. Specific permitted uses within the Project Area are those that are permitted, or conditionally permitted, by the zoning ordinance contained in the Municipal Code when the zoning ordinance conforms to the General Plan. The number of dwelling units will be in accordance with the provision of the General Plan and zoning ordinance of the City. •- Public Uses, Public Street Layout, Rights-of-%flay and Easements The public rights-of-way, principal streets and streets that may require Improvements as proposed for the Project Area are illustrated In Exhibit A. t Streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, tecsted, or closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper development of the project. Additional public streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency and the City in the Project Area as needed for proper development, circulation and access. -- Semi-!'ublic, Institutional, and Nonprofit Uses The Agency Is authorized to permit the establishment or enlargement of public, semi-public, Institutional, or nonprofit uses, including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, fratemal, employee institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations In appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, if allowed by the Agency, shall conform so for as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uc= In the specific area Involved. The Agency shall Impose such other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect. the development and use of the Project Area. 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements All real property In the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. Furthermore, the Agency may, If It deems appropriate and/or necessary, specify requirements In excess of those described herein or specified by state and local laws. No real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of the Plan except with approval of the Agency and In confo,man;e with the provisions of this Plan. -12- i -- Construction All constructio.., whether new or rehabilitation, In the Project Area i shall comply with al; applicable state and local laws In effect from time to time Including, but not necessarily limited to, faro, building, j housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses Although the Agency anticipates that few, If any, existing structures within the Project Area will meet the standards for rehabilitation, they, with Agency approval, may be repaired, altered, reconstructed, or rehabilitated, If necessary, in such a manner that will meet the following requirements: -- Be safe, sanitary, and sound In all physical respects; -- Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the 4 rehabilitation requirements of the building code for the City of Huntington Beach. -- Shall conform to the fire code for the City of Huntington Beach. -- Shall be comparable In appearance to the architecture of the on-site proposed new structures. -- Retention of Existing Nonconforming Uses The Agency Is authorized to permit an existing use to remain in an existing building In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use j does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use Is generally compatible with the developments and uses in the Project { Area. The owner of ouch a property must be willing to enter into a Participation Agreement and agree to the Imposition of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. Tha Agency is also outhorized to permit an existing use In an existing building not In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provision of this Plan, provided that such buildings are rehabilitated to a decent, safe and sanitary condition, as determined by the Agency, and provided that such a use is generally compatible with development and uses in the Project Area. The owner of auch a property must be willing to enter into a Participation Agreement and agree to the imposition of such reasonable restrictions an are necesvary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. -I3- 1—Kf.1'. Y:.«.f:�i..•. �T:..:is ... . ...,.i•• • .... . .. . ..,,...... . . . I 1 -- Incompatible Uses No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odor, or similar factors would be Incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall ba permitted in any part of the Project Area. -- Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, Including any parcels retained by a participant, shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. -- Limitation of Building Density The number of buildings In the Project Area will be consistent with building Intensities permitted pursuant to existing or revised local zoning ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. -- Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building, and other applicable codes and ordinances and this plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the j Plan shall supersede. i All new buildings built within the Project Area shall complement the overall aesthetic and physical scale of the existing buildings within and adjacent to the Project Area. -- Open Space, Landscaping, and Parking An approximate amount of open space Is to be provided in the Project Area as required by City codes and ordinances and the Plan. Within the Project Area, both public and private strente, public and private parking and private streets shall be provided for In each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time and this Plan. In all areas sufficient space, Including open spaces, shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air, and privacy. §tons Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearances by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation, or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted in this Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for identification, of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. I I i -14- i .a.wN•,..n�a w r�,R:+tf.Y.:.H'F.".l:.7d7;►'• i Nondiscrimination and Nonsegragation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancys tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. -- Employees and Contract Awards from the Community Contractors and others engaged in construction and rehabilitation activities in the Project Area small be encouraged to hire and train the maximum number of employees and trainees from within the community consistent with the objectives of this Plan. Likewise, where feasible, the Agency shall make distinct efforts to award contracts to business concerns which are located in, or substantially owned by persons residing in, the Project Area if they meet requirements stipulated by the Agency and this Plan. -- Minor Variations Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency Is authorized to permit minor variations from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit such minor variations, the Agency must determine that: -- The strict application of the provisions of the Plan would result In practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and Intent of this Plan. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the Intended development of the property which do not generally apply to other propertlec having the same standards, restrictions and controls. -- Permitting a minor vailation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or Improvements within or outside the Project Area. -- Permitting a minor variation will not be contrary to the objectives of this Plan. No such minor variation shall be granted which changes a basic land uae or which permits substantial departure from the provisions of this Plan. In permitting any such minor variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or .Yolfarep and to assure compliance with the purposes of this Plan. Non.`;scrimination and nonsegregation restrictions shall not be subject to minor variation. '•r., .1. .. .. . . . . i. .r ... . • .. .. ........,.w ....... . ..• ....1f.tf.u+.w....v.rtiw r. ••MNww No minor variation permitted by the Agency shall be effective until conditional uses, variances, or other zoning changes, If any, have been effectuated by the City to the extent necessary to obtain consistency with such minor variations permitted by the Agency. �I 3.5 Methods for Project Financing i 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, If it deems appropriate, is authorized to finance this project with assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, State of Califorhia, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, special assessment districts, property tax Increments, interest revenue, Income revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, the Agency-owned ro ert the sale of Agency-owned property, tease ofproperty,Y� or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. i The City may supply advances and expend money as necessary to assist i the Agency in carrying out this project. Such assistance shall oe on terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 9 Pi 3.5.2 Tax Increments s: Tax Increment financing may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project assessed valuation base r will be established in accordance with state law as described herein. �.. Any tax Increments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the Increment by itself or from the sale of tax allocation bonds allows. ; i All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any 4 district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows; -- That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate t upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property In the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used In connection with the i taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing i agencies, on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating tares levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies f { I ' which did not include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance bur to which such territory Is i annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange last equalized an the i effective date of sold ordinance shall be used in Oetermining the assessed valuation of the taxable pruperty in zhe project on said effective date); and -- That portion of said levied taxes each year In excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and Interest an bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, this redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project axceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property In,the project shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and Interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property In the project shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. f That portion of taxes discussed In this Subsection are hereby Irrevocably pledged' far the payment of the principal of and Interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the Incurring of any Indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance 'or refinance in ` whole or In part the Mein-PIer Redevelopment Project. -- The Agency Is authorized to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and Indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and banded indebtedness contained In this Subsection. 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes The Agency may Issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be Issued only after the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, available to repay principal and Interest when due and payable. In any case, the Issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their Issuance. -17- I The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of Its political subdivisions liable for them, nor In any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other then those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an Indebtedness with the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 3.5.4 Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the lin'ted States, or any other public or private source will be utilized I, available as the Agency deems appropriate to its corporate purposes. 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may in any year during which it owns property In a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exempt, an amount of money In lieu of taxes. ! The,Agency may also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which In the Agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the project. 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Scrtions 33333.2 and 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are Imposed ` on this Plan. Taxes as deflned In Section 33670 of the California Community Redevelopment Law shall not be divided and shall not be allocated to the Agency during any one fiscal (tax) year except j. by amendment of this Plan, In excess of $20250,000. -- No loans, advances, or Indebtedness to finance, in whole or In part, the Redevelopment Project and to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes described in the befommentioned Section 33670 shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond 20 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council unless such time limitation is extended by amendment of this Plan. However, such loans, advances, or Indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time longer than such time limit. -- Without an amendment of this Plan, the, amount of bonded Indebtedness swerved by tax increments which the Agency shall ; have outstanding at any one time shall not exceed $22,500,000. -18- .^�.`.++r.v.w.........r..r....�.-ra.................... ......... .. • ,i .... .. .. ... r ...�.... . s.11r..Y..r.. •ARI».IL�.TIIt'. 1 , ,.., -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are Filocai:pd to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by tt+a AgPr,:y for the purposes of increasing and improving the communit;y's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income, as defined In Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low income households as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: -- That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or increase the , supply of housing fov persons and families of low or moderate Income or very low income households; or -- That some stated percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing need; or j -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs In the community Is being made, and that this effort, Including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, Is equivalent hi Impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate Income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of increased employment opportunitles, or because of any other direct or Indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. {{` VI' -19- i ' I� .� 1 rJJ� J� Exhibit "All ov Jr + +�+ � �a�atr; ;• r I _ r ♦ Jr / • R r 4 r i J t �♦ w N � � r t � 1 LJ Clr cz., r - r LLI cr- 4 aL- 11 l wa l 31A 1 rA .e... LtJ r�uur Now ) t.1 Q_ J • � . s r � La.J . U FtLU • r lZ � fIAlr f�/r w 7 ■ 4, sit r a --.-#ice r r sgAtwis swrl�rwrrrlrrol�• r i I t -20- I �I it I I` l i Exhibit "B" c I LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 1 Beginning at the intersection of the northerly line at Walnut Avenue and the westerly line of Sixth Street. as shown on a map of Huntington Beach recorded in book 3, page 36 of.Miscellaneous Maps in the office of, the Orange County Recorder; thence southwesterly along said westerly right-of-way of Sixth Street and its extension to the High Tide Line of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said High Tide Line to a line parallel with and 35.00 feet northwesterly; measured at right angles, from the northwesterly. I ine of Main Street as shown on said Map of Huntington Beach; thence southwesterly along .said line 1470 feet more or less to a perpendicular line parallel with and 60.00 feet southwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly end of the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier; thence southeasterly along said line 145.Wfeet to,.a line parallel with and 35.00 feet southeasterly from the southeasterly line of said Main Street; thence northeasterly along said line to the High Tide Line of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said High Tide Line to the southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of lake Street (formerly First Street) as shown on said map at Huntington Beach; thence northeasterly along said extension and the southeasterly line of Lake Street to the southerly extension of the easterly line of said Walnut Avenue; thence northerly and northwesterly along the easterly and northerly line of Walnut Avenue to the point of beginning. -Z1- 10. . CITY DF HL.liRi'1 INGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 P.0.Box 190 IIOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 12, 1982 Dear Property Owner: The Community Redevelopment Agency!`of the City of Huntington Beach initiated proceed- ings for the adoption of a redevelopment plan for the Main-Pier Project Area within the City of Huntington Beach. The Agency and the City Council will hold a ,point public hearing on the plan on September 7, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 200D Main Street, Huntington Beach. Notice of this joint public hearing is enclosed for your information. The purposeof the redevelopment plan is to eliminate the conditions, as described in Health and Safety Code Sections 33031 and 33032, which have prevented private citi- zens and business enterprises from developing the project area by providing public assistance through a cooperative public/private effort. While property in the prbJect area will be subject to public acquisition by purchase or condemnation, it is proposed that condemnation proceedings can only be utilized if and when at' least sixty (60) percent of the property owners representing at least sixty'(60) percent of the land holdings within a given area, approve the specific development proposal being proposed for said area. This approach reflects the Agency's commitment to insure meaningful property owner participation in the planning process and in the establishment of a development program which responds to both the owners' and the City's collective interests. It should be noted. that the Agency has no present plan or, without the necessary approval as described above, authorization to acr,!iire your property either through negotiations or condemnation proceedings. However, if such approval or authorization would be forthcoming at some time in the future, it is required by law to determine the full fair market value of the property by an appraisal and to then meet with the property owner in an effort to reach an agreement on the purchase price. The Agency is further obligated to provide relocation assistance to any person, family or busi- ness which must be relocated. The Agency welcomes any comments or advice you might have an the Redevelopment Plan or the Draft EIR. If you wish to comment on these.documents, you may do so by writing to the Agency at City hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. Copies of the Redevelopment Plan, the Draft EIR and related documents are available at the Office of Business and Industrial Enterprise at City Hall. Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise TT:3b Telephone (114)536-5542 •, r .f. . • r. �'' •. '1 . r .. ,. .,.. - .. . ... - r ..�...........r ..r .......nR r..r.0 Y.Iu...w•..� .ter-..+rw I LEGAL NOTICE .71a4 NOTICE OF AIJOI(T PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE 1l 2 MY 6F-HUNTINGTON.BrACH AND THE HUNT NGTON REACH REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY ON THE PROPOSED MAIN-PIER REDEVE1 OPMOT PLAN Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington ' Beach, California,. and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency .have set September 7, 1982 at 7:30 p.m. as the time, and the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 as the place for a;jo.int public hearing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelop- ment Agency.. to consider the approval and adoption of the proposed Main-Pier Redevelopment Plan. The Agency will implement the adopted Plan if, after the joint public hearing, the City Council approves and adopts the proposed Redevelopment Plan. The purpose of the joint public hearing is to consider: 1. The. Redevelopment Plan submitted by, the Agency which proposes as its scope and objective to eliminate unsafe conditions, improve overall appearance, encourage participation, encourage new development, provide needed public improvements and facilities, and increase employment opportunities. 2. The report 'of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelop. ment Plan includes, but is not limited to, the report and recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission on the Plan and the report of the , County Fiscal Review Committee (if any). 3. The Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Plan. 4. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the Redevelop- �~ ment Plan. j At the above stated day, hour and place, any and all persons having any objec- tions 'to the 'proposed .Redevelopment Plan or to the regularity of any of ,the prior proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. At any time not later. than the hour aforesaid set- for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan may file in writing with the City Clerk a statement of his objections to the 'proposed Redevelopment Plan. Any person or organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. At the aforesaid hour the Council shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written and oral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. f The proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report are now on file and open,for public inspection in the office of the Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. Every property owner, business or tenant interested -in becoming a participant, pursuant to the Participation Rules adopted by the Agency, should submit to the Agency a completed "Statement of Interest to Participate" within sixty (60) days {from the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Agency. The boundaries of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are as defined in Exhibit "A" as follows: I Exhibit "A" LEGAL MSCRIPTION MAIN-PIER RUDEVELO1IRM PROJECT AREA That portion of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, page 36 of Miscellaneous Amps in the Office of the County. 11ecorder of said County described ns follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Pacific Cast highway and Lake Street shown as Ocean Avenue and First Street respectively on said mentioned map; thence along the centerline of Pacific Coast Highway South 480 21' 4Z" Fast 37.5 i feet to the intersection with the southwesterly extension of the southeast line of Lake Street; thence along said mentioned extension South 410 38' 18" West 50 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being distant Southeast 48° 21' 42" i East 1655 feet along the southwest line of Pacific Coast Highway to the intersection with the southwesterly extension of the northwest line of Sixth Street; thence continuing South 410 38' 18" Nest 525 feet more or less along said extension to 1' the High Tide Line' of the Pacific Ocean; thence northwmsterly 910 feet more or less along said High Tide Line to a line parallel.with and 35 feet southeasterly measured at right angles from the southwesterly extension of the line of Ai3in �> Street as shown on said Rap of I lunt ing ton.Beach; thence along said mentioned parallel line South 410 38' 1811West 1470 feet to a line parallel with and 60 feet southwesterly, measured at right tangles from the southwesterly end of the 16ntington Beach Municipal Pier; thence North 480 21' 421, hest 14S feet along said parallel litre to a line parallel with and 35 feet northwesterly measured at right angles, from the southwesterly extension of the northwest line cf Main Street; thence North 410 38' 18" East 1,170 feet to the llifih Tide Line of the Pacific Ocean'. thence northwesterly 600 feet more or less along said High Tide Line to the southwesterly extension of the northwest line of Sixth Street; thence along said extension and northwest line of Sixth Street North 410 38' 18" Last 1035 feet more or less to'the intersection with the northeast line of Walnut Avenue, being 60 I feet in width, 30 feet cidner side of centerline, said point being distant North i 410 38' 18" East along said northwest lino 510 feet from the southwest line of Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said northeast line of Walnt% Avenue South 480 21' 42" Last 1330 feet to an angle point in said line, said point also being on the southeast line of Second Street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; tltcnce continuing along said northeast line South 10c` 09' 04" East 414 feet to the southeast line of Lake Street; thence along said southeast ° line South 41 381 18" West 254 feet to the True Point of Beginning. i .i ti 1 . • 1_ 13 ' •• y r % �` t ► t'1 cyl- i f �.., �.. • cc f \ Sift W t�1,�r1� Il ,_�._ r rff r•fM r a�f f�w h . r ► ti,r LLJ � '7!s J•r LAJ uj pit _.._� .4 . .fat Avis Nt 1 f f ff=f f tmfiimme law fImrmffws ` t- 1 ���•�«�••'�`�•�r� mot' ' i t• } r t • ' Septe.:fiber 7, 1932 Q:.•cur G. Tuylor lluntia;;ton Leach, Galifurrtia ?.0. ::u:: 7-15 1:U:lt111,;toih :.";ucil, Ca City o:: 4:untin;ton 'each i Attention: iayor, City Council i'l.hnnihh,; ,)e:pt:. City i'-ill -- 17t1i & iLain St. Huntinuton Beach, Cclifornia g21J4':j Your donor, :}car Urn, ` I a:.: uritin�; regardin;; the proposals mein;; considcrod rejardiht_; j the dountownl wren of lluntitlgton i',cacit. An you uay or ..,.aj not i=%: about a rrontlh a---o I eras asked to ::crve on n cor;.iittec rc;;ardinj; the proposed redevelopLhcnt plan for the area bet con Like :j'traut to Gth Street and back to llalnut Avenue. ::ven thoush I had been completely out of "touch" reyr►rdin- the proposed plans I agreed to serve and do chat I could. I did attend the !.icetiros and tried to ca tc.4 up oil all that has transpired since 1964 when the City of Hunt-In;-ton beach i,!ade all the clhanaes in the C-3 .ono. Frankly I Just ;,ave up in 1964 because of these chap esl ' :!:in; nw ay the residential use of the C-3 and the unreasonable parking require- ments w"s one of tht major causes of the deterioration of the downtown areal however this is all past history so I a3reed to do tirhat I Carl in one last effort concerhrinn Do mtowtn iiuntin_;ton Dench. I Also attended the field trip last Friday to take a loo': at the redevr.lopr.rent of Uolnito%ni areas of Long Ecaclh, i:edonilo Beach and Lo:s An;.elos. I have not had the time and enerLy, i'rith such ;lhort notice to diLest all the written infor,,:tation and pro- posals concerain., the Jowrntowm ihrca. I havt_` talked to 30;:C of thu ourners of property but have not been in contact itith ethou,lh of the!i to feel that I can adequately represent their viewpoints. 1 do l:noi: however that None have upgraded their buildingo accordin; to the .rthqu:ikc requirhnents and probably wonder what goes? Can they us.. their buildin;s without bein- "Hassled" or trill cone: otlu:r plan io into play? Also of five rncnbers T found nyscli to be a b 0 U L !:c only metaber that owned property. illerc was another prot,,,. ouncr Lut lij did not attend after the lirot pectin;. 'lice ot.. foe were not property owners (operators of busincssc,.; and a t. livinn in all nVarttnent). I an interested, j in devolop:w-at but xL -��ry uneasy about trying to represent all the property owner:. i, ' ^ area. Luckily two other property i otmcrr,, not on the co:a;iitt� ­.howed tip for one of the ucetin,;s. �. I have r.Iiaed feelingu about ­0tin,, concerning thin proposal. t I still feel that the property have been left a:; the ori;;- j inal C--.t .:one (aia encloain+; a co,., :is C-3 zone as it was u;s i of 19G4). It is hard for ne to unLc__ !tow the city could give the Ulu! World developshant the zonin ; t., ti corhbine:d Core:icrc-- ial -- .:esideatial use and have trl!:en it -,,,n the property owners in the luwntown area? Also the city .. i lotted ItL-hrise in other areas yet seers dutenii:ned to tnl:c it a:: . -.h the down- town property owmere (wee a',rn a parcel on C.il.11. i, ')th and 10th Strectu arhd wn: have lieared that it will be ;;one:_ only t four storiea and only for 4U livinn, unit:;). After buyii,, !wits j property in 1963 and [:taUng payments rtingin;; from $700 to .,i,,vO ! N12. Sub j"07y2D bvA111 Pu B b 1 NevaniivG- OAu A14.:a Ili en nosZecx AlaeA_ 1•:...^,[..vS n's...w. .41, . . .. i _ . .. , r . . .•jt.J.'..:y„N.f i•.aA.iJ,�.'{fe.• � N l I - S'z I -2-- per taonth for the last 19 1/Z years and paying $4,(,., ') to $5,000 per year taxes a person can beco:-,e somewhat discoura„ d. P.spec-- iully when some years ago we presented plans for a 14 Story building that coat all the codes and the City of ifuntingto-1 Beach and the Coastal Commission turned it down (on reco=acndat_'.,3n by the City). It would have left all hinds of open space and %,,ould not Rasa even cast a shadow on other parson's property and would not have cut off any ones view (even though I have never seen any thing in the constitution whereby a property owner is obligated to make sure that another property owner's (or tenant's) view is not blocked. They are welcome to buy our property at full market value to protect their view if they wish. They can buy it and do- nate it for a park or whatever us for as I am concerned. I will outline and justify my asking price below in this letter. I an really discouraged about holding this property all these years and then to find out that I have, or am about to, lose all the use of the property as per the C-3 zone as it was in in 19063 (the year we obligated ourselves to buy and make payneetts and pay tastes on this particular piece of property. It should not take too tauch imz-i *anon to understand why I (we) are discoumn 4 as to trying to hold on to this particular property any longer. Our decision as of now is to just sell off the lots inidividually be- cause of what use has been proposed for these 10 lots. We just cannot cone out with only 40 living units after holding it all these yearn, lie have held on to a complete block of frontage and two corners (250' X 150) with the assurance of the City that to have: a group of 10 lots togetl,,er would allow for high rise and a higher density. In any event I point out this because it is adja- cent to the proposed downtown redevelopment area, but not includ- ed... I do not understand why it was not included in the proposed plan? I would also like to let you know that I have build new buildings in the downtown area. I (we) own some of the oldest buildings (both brick and woad construction). I;e otim thin beat re- model building in the downtown area. 'We have had arsonist burn up a building ( a much more serious problem than earthquakes). In other words I have been involved in coat evary type of problem In regards to trying to own property in what I consider a socialis- tic type of society. It just has not been easy to try to hold rental property and depend on it for incocie with all the hastle the city of fib trying to keep the buildings enpty and Ave you a bad time so they could buy theca cheap by the neans of inverse condemnation; as has been the case in the past. I have not been in "touch" and have not .been kept informed by the City so I don't have any fixed viawpoict . as to pro or con regarding the propos- ed downtown redevelopmec.. plan. Also I have been told no many things and heared sr, =.iy rumors that I do not char to believe. I would like to present some historic background and then some suggestions concerning the downtown area: I was born in the da%jttown. area of Sluntington Beach in 1921. I bought in the downtown area in 1961-1963 time frame be- cause I believed in the future of the area. I thought with the C-3 zone (including Residential - :onnercial use combin- ation and with the unlimited hight limit) that it would be a 1 sari r ' ti -3- good investment Igo one taul;ht ue about inverse condemnation when I attended lluntint,,ton Beach High School (1935-1939). My father was the torn marshal in 1921. I;y mother was born near Edinger and Beach and is almost ready to become 95 years old (young). I saw all the farm land turned into "walled in" hous- ing tracts. I (we) have have had our properties depreciated be- cause of inverse condemnation on the part of the City of HB & have even been offered really ridiculous prices by the City of IM after trying to I.-cop the buildings empty. In other words we were not treated very fairly in the past. tic have seen some strange things happen politically concerning zoning and use of (lack of use of) our property in the past. 11ith this background I feel that I have a little more right to spealt out for my view point than, say, some of the John or Jane come lately types. I fe+nl that if some of these people oppose tlq highest and beat use of our properties then they should got .. acther and cone up with the money to buy there from us (at the true full value as determined by couparing the increano in value of the property located, say, two to three blocks in from the CI9i sinco 1961-- 1964 and giving us in the fLrst blocks the sane increse in val- ue) Let there buy it and domite it to the appropriate govern- mental agency for whatever asc they feel it should be put to. I am sure they would not want to donate their homes (If they own one) or to donate their car or whatever personal belongings without gust compensation. However come of them may have never strived to own anything and might resent somceane working for 50 years from a poverty beginning to try to be wolf sufficient. In any event I do not see how they feel it is just to not be able to use property for what you bought it for; after making pay- ments on it for almost 20 years. It should be noted that when purchased as C-3 it allowed for both Residential p Commercial use and the code stated that the height was MILIIITTF.D. I would suggest that these types of persons stop driving their cars and stop living in their houses. 'They should agree to loci: then up but to cons uaue to make the paymieats and pay the taxes etc. if they do not feel that others should be able to make use of the property they own according to use when they purchased it. In other words .. they should either put up or shut up1 Will try to bring this to a halt! Acre are ny suggestions: Do nct try to drive the property values down through inverat con- demnation as has been done in the past. Prc,party ocmers are naturally suspicious of the (amity of IB because of the treatment they have received in the past and ridiculous offer cracks by the City to the property owners in the past. I suggest a lease type of arrangement whereby the the City could be the master lessee from the property ocmcrs, and then become the lessor to a large. ?avelpment firm later. Give the owners a fair return based on the present market place, then w1th a reappraisal in say three years, then in five years and then, say ton years. You will never get all the owners to agree to sell. I for one do not want to sell and I do not want so in Frith any other group. I an- looking for steady income without being a landlord. I will agree to lease if the value is based on the same percentage of increase in value 1 I -4- has tsa'.:cn place in nd jacent town lots between Itnlnut backs to, day, Oratt,;e cuadl but:wen Lr ke rnd 213rd ':%rcuts. In other words an Faorcc::7ent to thi, :could .30"'^!:322t Of fic?t tit'.! inversd- eonde:ztatiori that ha.� Laken lllace in tit.. drnmtown :area. J . course there is the v;t'.ue of the buildin;,; ctnd the! prcucnt income to be ta'.xn in- to consider^Lion. Also the cost of movin;; cone of the things I itavz! stored and setting up in another locattion. In other words an "Irvine" type 55 year lenoc would be agrecable to Ise. I urill, naturally get 3o„1c lc-al advice and this offer would be subject to this but I feel that thiu idea of leasin- has merit and right be tie only tray you will ever het the owners of property to a- -,roe on a way of getting togctltcr ttitia :iae City of :ki3. In any i event let the City cane to us with a fair and just proposal. I i� am Sure you will not be sable to get ,a good nw-ibar of the owners to agree to sell. Another proposal would be to tape sole of the surplus propert-; thLt the city has on hand and make uomc proposed exchan;;es. I night be receptive to this idea. I read nbout the surplus fire station. I rtig;ht be interested if I could use it and not be threatened with contict:mation and could use it for an it-1 or C-2 use. Just a t}iou;,ht. I night be interested in the t'-I-2 property located behind the Edison plant if I could usa it for disuaantalin- use. In any event 1 slant to see sonctiaing; happen. I do not know if any of the ideas I luive presented in this para- graph are worth while or worth considering but I an presenting the::i to you at this tins. Zhesa are my own thoughts and not of any other otmer. An stated 1 just do not; feel that I can repre- sent ot;aer property owners because of such short notice about be- in8 on the connittee. I an W.1 in to sit down any time anti do what I can to try :o work. frith the city of 141D. I a.^ sure that, fru;:t what I hear, that the City of HD has a Much different ntti- rude than it dig Lack. in the 60s. I assume the City will be fairl I an not getting any younger and I have had to have ny hip talon apart and replaced ,rith steel and plastic three times during the taut three yearn. I an not in the taood to hold in there truth longer. I would like to spend the income now irithout worrying a- bout tryi.n- to collect rent and havin;; the City of II13 haultle me a.. , the tira2. I cminot afford to sell out and pay all the ttxcs. I a:.a in tkae hood to lease the proportf on a fair and equitable basis. I just do not feel like Waiting :another 20 years. I a311 long ;;one by then at the rate tkring3 are Doing. Lets take steps to do sozething;k Just think if I hau been rble to build the 14 story building about 10 years ;a,,o it would have been what III; needed to bet things goings And the City would go along with this plan even though it mat the existing; codes and planning re- quire^_entsl It Would have cost d:,e about about ono--third as much to build then. Vow wlitla higher costa anti less density and frith C the high rise about to be done away with it becomes n loser. Laot but not least, it is not out cf spite but bccausv of necea-. sity that we have decided to yell off the ten lots one at a time instead of trying to hold than together any longer. If there is any chance that a higher density and that the high rise can be retained let sae ) now right away as I do not feel tha rlpo'rq�� thcrt together any longer. End of Page.lours truly, scat ` 1 { io.. — `/1.••. i r«A`�'` ice• i t 1J/ MANUFACTURING COMPANY 7801 CLAY STREET.HUNTINGTON BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92847.02001P.O.BOX 2000•Telephon• 7141 848.1555 i 1 \ September 31 1982 0 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 vain Street Huntington Beach, California 92640 ; Dear Members of the Council: >1 We would like to express our support for a redevelopment i project for the old town section of the City of Huntington Beach. Properly done we -think that it would become a 1 tremendous asset to the city. ; . It would not only be a large revenue source for the city but it would most certainly clean up a blighted area and make it more usable for the public, i f We are aware of what has been accomplished by the City, of Long Beach and are sure that the same could be accomplished along the coast line of Huntington Beach. I Very truly yours, CAMBRO MANUFACTURING COMPANY Richard Hammond General Manager D (� Rf*/gk 14'11 a t P '( 1982 CITY OF,HILIONGTON BEACH 1 1 AQMINI5TRAME OFFICE i 4 i 4 1