Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRedevelopment Agency - Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project A I. i GENERAL PLAN 77=1 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS • adapted a Wt, 1977 I • i � Y , huntingtan beach planning department 1 NUNTIN&ON BEACII PLANNING DEFT. AU G S 19R P. 0. Box 190 RESOLUTION NO.' 4A84 1.1untington Beach, CA 9264p. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERA, PLAN BY ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AIdENDMENT NO. 77--1 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 77--3 THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the Land Use Element of the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and General Plan Amendment No. 77-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 77-3 thereto are necessary to meet the community needs; and Public hearing on adoption of said amendment and EIR was duly conducted before the Planning Commission and approved by a majority of the voting members of the Commission.- ,Thereafter, + A the City Council, after giving notice as g prescribed by Government Code Section 65355, held at least one public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 77-1 and EIR No. 77-3; and r At said hearing before the City Council all persona desiring to be heard on said amendment and EIR were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, com- mencing s with Section. 65357, that General Plan Amendment No. 77-1 and Environmental Impact Report No. 77-3 are hereby approved and adopted and the Land Use Element of the Genera;. Plan is hereby amended. e PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular m thereof h n th,-- lot day of August, 1977. ATTEST: • Alicia M. Wentworth . Mayor Deputy City Clark • 1. REVIEWED AND APPROVED: . AHROVED AS TO FORM: City Administrator ..r�r ty At n •INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ' 'P'�an�ng bir�ctor r • c _ 1. 2. S 4 A SUIT OF CALIFORNIA ) COUM OF ORANGE CITY OF HMINGTON BEACH ) 1, ALICIA H. WEMKORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the .City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk 'of the w City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the'City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing revolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council A it a regular meeting thereof held an the le! t� day of August , lq L7 j by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: # Bartlett. Wisder, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Pattinson NOES: Councilmen: None OM r ABSENT: Councilmen: None • Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clark of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California By, 4 if tlt- Deputy City Cler • M M r RESOLUTION NO. 1196 F-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING AMENDMENT TO THE GENERATj PLAN 77-1 #41 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission- of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives, and WHEREAS, amendment to the nine State-mandated General Plan Elements [Land Use, Open Space/Conservation (combined) , Seismic- Safety (combined) , Noise, Circulation, Scenic Highways, and Housing] is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and WHEREAS, Amendment to the General Plan 77--1 constitutes an updated General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach consisting of the nine mandatory elements, and n WHEREAS, a public hearing on adoption of said amendment was held by the City Planning Commission on June 7, 1977, in accord- ance with provisions of the State Government Code, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com- C-1 mission of the City of Huntington Beach hereby adopts said amend- ment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. +� PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California on the 7th day of June, 1977, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Parkinson, Finley, Gibson, Slates, Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES: None ABSENT: Nona ABSTAIN: None .ATTEST; I "'�) Edward D. Selich 'R g D. Slates- Secretary Chairman G � f 401 w TABLE OF CONTENTS A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION I 1.1 Methodology . 1 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 3 2.1 South of Ellis Avenue and West of Huntington 3 Street 2.2 North of Slater Avenue and West of Gothard 6 Street 2.3 North of Talbert Avenue and East of Gothard . 8 Street 2.4 Gothard Street, South of Heil Avenue 11 2.5 North of Heil Avenue and West of Gothard 13 Street 2.6 South of the San Diego Freeway and East of. 15 San,Angelo Drive 2.7 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa ;17 rt Chica Street 2.8 South of Hamilton Avenue and West of 20 Magnolia Street f • 2.9 South of Talbert Avenue and West of Beach 2 3 t Boulevard` 3.0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY .27 3.1 Area by Area Summary 27 3.2 Summary of Proposed General Plan Amendment 77-1 .29 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 31. `. 4.1 Introduction 31 4.2 Environmental Setting 35 4.3 Environmental Impacts and Mitigating Measures 41 : • 4.4 Alternatives 60 �r 4.5 Short-Term and Long-Term Productivity 61- 4.6 Irreversible impacts 61 t, 4.7 Growth inducing Impacts 61 "Y+.f ADDENDUM 65 Y'L F1 �1 r 7 1 A w A 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document constitutes an amendment �o the General Plan Land Use Element. Al previous amendments are reflected in the DeceMber, 1976 General Plan Land Use Diagram. w 1.1 Methodology This amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element is designed to investigate some areas where changing conditions require re- consideration of past decisions. The changes considered in the amendment derive from requests from property owners. and the Planning Department. In Section 2.0, Planning Issues, each case is discussed and analyzed in terms of existing conditions and impact on surrounding areas as well as consistency with City goals and policies. Section 3.0 summar+zes the recommendtti�ona contained in Section 2.0 in the form of a comprehensive text and plan to be adopted. Section 4.0 presents an Environmental Impact Report for the amendment as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. M M Land USe 03Wgmies REOD84M e*Ae s 2 un/gm ! =Esk to 54 un/goc Law Dernity s 7ur.boc f� ? =Medkrrn DL+diy <15tryboc =No Density>15 u ttm 1 1 1 COMMERCIAL =Offte Protessloncd Mixed Derrelopment n= \ M OUST13AL Generafi . PUBM USE Public Qjasi-p_b c,Institutional = j i i=� (� jj '� '• '.sl�i�:3!}n +J' - }�^��� Open n Spoc'one+!� {[.� �ji F # = = tv =i•i:�i :; - lat.:3e Oflu n= _ E .• :}�:;}sl;i=E z �}i •� 1 PLANYING UNITS ==s: ', iaEfii Pfiaminp Reser�+e . '.: i:_.... € �,:_;?I;t!� ��� s t R ( Ptamed Communfifiy _ •::_ .l .._. •"xl:, mu ^}=1=le:. \\ OTti?USES : :. 0 Resource Prdiction Wil COW o. r _ � Si mac.• :� { F .. � r. �, :':✓�i-�n�r•G�Y 0=;-•,s���•,�i ems}' _ . N![�IC � �I1 _ter,—� �,.• �r _�_-.— �,_. __ — Vr� F 19; DOWMAN PLAN LAND l '•DLAGRAM Decemtw W .tl MIN PAM FIGURE 2-1 WMIGYM:MMW :GMFOMA Areas Of Concem Imp PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 A p It A 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN This section deals with each issue area designated in Figure 2--1. • 2.1 South of Ellis Avenue and West of Huntington Street. 2.1.1 Background The area of concern is located south of Ellis Avenue and east of the Pacific Electric Railroad (Figure 2-2) . w In June, 1976, Classic Development Corporation requested that the Planning Department consider redesignating the property from industrial to high density residential. The 7.14 gress acre site is presently vacant and desig- nated light industrial. The partially developed property a to the south and the vacant property to the vest are designated industrial. The developed property to the east is designated medium density residential. The developed property to the north is designated low density residential. W 3 I r 2.1.2 Analysis Residential uses border the subject property on the north and east, while the southern boundary abuts industrial uses. These two uses create a question as to what is the best use for the property. The site received a moderate suitability rating in the Industrial Land Use Study, Part II and was recommended r for deletion from the Central Industrial Corridor. In- dustrial use of the property would continue the in- dustrial character to the south and west but would not be consistent with residential uses to the north and east. Local access would have to be provided through the existing residential section of Ellis Avenue until such time as r. Ellis Avenue is extended under the existing railroad tracks to Gothard Street. Construction of this link is tentatively scheduled for the summer of 1977. However, freeway exposure potential of the site is still only fair to poor as is much of the Central Industrial Corridor below Ellis Rvenue. In addition to land use compatibility n and traffic access, severe on-site topography reduces the property' s capability to attract quality industrial development in the future. Topography is less a constraint to residential development because a planned development .concept could be instituted to circumvent such difficulties. At best, market potential for this site is r, long-term. Residential use of the property is possible as it would provide for the transition of industrial uses on the south to the residential neighborhood on the north. An issue arises as to which would .be a more appropriate density. A high density development would result in the addition of 259 dwelling units; with a population of 552 people. Whereas a low density designation, 0-7 units per acre, would establish 52 units with a population of 261 people. The low density residential would create the fewest dwelling units and would be compatible with the single family homes to the north. However, it would not be compatible with industrial uses to the south. The medium density residential use would be compatible with all the surrounding uses; because it is most transitional between C industrial and low density residential. The high density residential uses would be in conflict with the single family residential neighborhood on the north. Therefore, the property should be designated medium density residential. w 9 lip 10 F— WON QUEEEC dR A r: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 4A. ALPERTA pR S WICI.IN� 2 1fUKON M. LIGHT INN S f � 1 SIT : ' �' 04 COhlwiti6�llE CR, A � . Of FIC1. EWCAL a LIGHT INDUSTRI P OF Lr,6nn 1 ?r:;l:iCA I r sMAL ' IfQS' I r AREA OF CONCERN 2.1 SOUTH CF ELms AVENUE i WEST OF HUNTWQTON STREET 'E FIGURE 2-2 s a� 2.1.3 Recommendation The area of concern south of Ellis Avenue and west of Huntington Street should be redesignated medium density residential. 2.2 North of Slater Avenue and West of Gothard Street 2.2.1 Background The site is located at the northwest corner of Slater Avenue and Gothard Street (zee Figure 2-3) . A request to change the present general plan designation of light industrial to low density residential was received in January, 1977. The requested change covers an area of 4.87 acres. The site is now vacant and the existing r, zoning is M1 (light industrial) . The area of concern is bounded by the Huntington Beach City Yard on the north and vacant R1 land on the west. The General Telephone maintenance yard is located to the south across Slater Avenue. A mixture of older single family homes and r, small industrial businesses (Ml) form the eastern bcundary r, across Gothard Street. 2.2.2 Analysis The Industrial Land Use Study designated the site as a moderate suitable area for industrial development. It has good traffic and utility access on Gothard Street. Physical land constraints are minimal. However, General Plan Amendment 76-2 redesignated the adjacent west. 5.36 acres to low density residential, reducing the former 10.23 acre site by more than one-half. The smaller site r makes it increasingly probable that quality industrial uses will not locate here. It is likely that future une would resemble other industrial uses around it, i.e. , „ open storage or mini warehouse. Such uses have been found by the Industrial Study not to financially benefit thn City. Low density residential use of the property would be com- patible with the low density designation to the west and existing single-famil.y, homes across Gothard Street. The City Yard and General Telephone Maintenance Yard border the site on the north and south but they would not r necessarily be a nuisance to a single-family development. Fences surround the facilities, and noise and traffic are minimal. Moreover, the site is separated from the General Telephone facility by Slater Avenue. v 6 lipv � dit 11 r► BETTY �` a► LIGHT IN LSTRIAL i � u d CF - C � � Lai z FORD DR A z i'a w O JDR. g STR I AL li SLAf I i PURLIC UTILITY LI HT AL i . CF- R AREA OF CONCERN 2.2 e NORTH OF SLATER AVENUE & WEST OF GOTHARD STREET lamp E,GuEF-- NLX Mw 1 r 2.2. 3 Recommendation The area of concern north of Slater Avenue and west of r` Gothard Street should be redesignated low density residential. 2.3 North of Talbert Avenue and East of Gothard Street 2. 3.1 Background r" The area of concern is located north of Talbert Avenue and east of the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way (see Figure 2-4) . It extends along the north side of Talbert Avenue to 1320 feet west of Beach Boulevard. Only the east 19.81 acres of the 38.7 acre site is requested for change from light industrial to medium density residential. The planning staff expanded the area of concern to .include the whole small lot area in order to encourage the development of compatible land uses in the general area. r Present zoning is M1 (light industrial) . The area of request is vacant, while a portion of the small lot area to the west contains a recreational vehicle storage yard. Land uses to the north of the subject property include vacant industrial land, manufacturing and storage build- i ings, and apartments. To the west across the railroad tracks is an automobile wrecking yard and a ready mix concrete business. Across Talbert Avenue to the south is vacant industrial property and a 10 acre industrial park. The site adjoins apartments and single family homes along the eastern boundary. r This area was first addressed in a previous amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element (July, 1975) . The analysis at that time focused on whether the site should he designated industrial or residential. The planning ;.taff concluded that the entire area should retain the ri sight industrial designation. Among the reasons cited was that residential development would be incompatible with industrial uses on three sides, subjecting the residents to increased arterial traffic, noise, and aesthetic problems. This conclusion assumed that the industrial corridor concept would be preserved in the r future. The Industrial Land Use Study (June, 1976) has questioned the validity of this assimption. As a result, the property owners resubmitted the request for residential use in time to be considered in General Plan Amendment 76-2 (October, 1976) . The application has been pending completion of the Industrial Land Use Study, Part 11 with its specific land reduction guidelines. 8 id t ■ r�rrr�tl♦�� r '�' �+� f � ���� r11111�AA�lt�AlA■ ! � 1 li�1,._.,.:. .........:.-F.�:� _sti. �Il�r�ii1i1�1�lrl�i■ � x�w+a�iiire��a�rr�.�Lrwwfarr�rrrurrr �tUtllllrUlllt1t11/tlllifTRtUlttltflltlft Ilttt r lilltft fll Veiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'iiieiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii l ttl�Euttlntlan tttltltlt UP ���'�'� 411tlttltt�{111t1111frlllrtlttle111tttttlfrlltllill -� 41 "lost Irtillfltltlltlttlllt tltrt[t111UlsI (t Itn111,11 ul[atnitunitlelt�llululrtt[Itll11 IttUtttt ClllctuulttttJllltltltltttltlsrtltttl{i iiifftiii�iiiti _ IIrItlElrtt1111tfE t[Itfl 4 r11tIt11111Ul111111111 � U1tslttll1111pr4�lttlt[lilltltltltt1f11/ttl)rlut illt[lltllirl`1tf tlltittl/ t t1111ttlIII Illalltl;V. As1 unttl�il ttU111tn111 t Its[till lllu111 r1ttort [tt rtrittr:l 1ltlrollta �tlttlltutit r r[Ilrttrrtlltttltrertrltlttlttltlti� � r lttttl 1 t{lllfll ttCtitllltfiltllrjrlrlllttl lull � � �� � � , 111111110 till iilei till'tl/�t 1111 11111 lilt r ,` ltil[Ri1iul1r���ii�;titsil1rIi4iiiitt,ll 111m,111#11111111Ittllt/ttIif111t11�t111111111111fr �tft�t �wtttttt.t��+►ss�.��Mt��t�l>t� ttttt/�r�ridt� rr 'lIl/��l[l�� � rrr.r..rrrr�rwrrrr rrr rr. I I r���«w..r.»ter wr`w�r�»���R•� ^rrr rrrr rrr rwrrrryw�Mi II�'lllll�l llll awry rr r-Mr--------r `— --YrYr+ ~r I II II Y-wr Yrr Mr�ryY Yrrrrw—l•w�T rtr� l\'ll�ll\�Il I�I Ill M-ra+.Mw rr}M-~��� III I•�I�III�I'�I�II r' Yrr-/fw�rrl+"RM r Y..rrrrr rM r� � rr...rr.l..r rrrr.Vrr� j u f 2.3.2 Analysis The results of the Industrial Land Use Study, Part II indicate that the subject property is poor as a potential industrial site. The 40 acre small lot area received a low suitWii.lity rating, and the study recommended that the entire site be deleted from the Central Industrial Corridor. r Industrial use of the site would conflict with resi- dential uses to the east and north. In addition, a sizeable portion of the surrounding land is undeveloped or in marginal industrial activity, and was also rescom- mended for deletion from the corridor by the Industrial Study. n one purpose of the proposed land reductions between Talbert and Slater Avenues was to improve compatibility with Central Park and the Library, and along arterials leading to these facilities. From this standpoint, in- dustrial use of the subject property would be incon- 6 sistent. The site contains other problems that result in a low industrial suitability rating. Talbert Avenue is not yet a fully developed primary arterial and freeway access is only fair. The property is also unserviced by drainage facilities. Probably a more significant factor retarding industrial development is small lot fragmentation and multiple ownership. The small lot area is over 40 percent consolidated but the remaining lots appear sufficient to discourage industrial interest. Miscellaneous small lots could better be integrated into a residential use C through a planned development concept. In evaluating alternative uses, low density residential and med-lum density residential should be considered. Whit use is most appropriate dc.-,dnds to a great extent on the disposition of surrounding industrial properties. The I site is surrounded on three sides by industrial land most of which is recommended for deletion by the In- dustrial Land Use Study, Part II. However, a firm de- cision on these properties has yet to be made. Some I sites, such as that west of the railroad tracks, contain i marginal industrial businesses that may delay attention C indefinitely. To designate the area of concern low density residential at this time could create land use inconsistencies in the future. if it is decided to retain industrial sites around the concern area in the future, low density residential would be incompatible with such uses. p Ca A medium density designation retains greater flexibility. It is consistent with existing R2 and R3 developments to the east and north, and the transitional nature of medium density makes it most compatible with industrial uses if they remained. Although a wrecking yard exists to the west, it would be separated from the site by the rail- road right-of-way. A medium density designation would not foreclose the future possibility of either low A density residential or industrial uses between the tracks and Central Park. In fact, the railroad right-of-way would be a more logicaj boundary between low and medium densities than would any point farther east. The residential areas below Talbert Avenue are developing to low density. Talbert Avenue would therefore serve as a suitable boundary between these developments and medium density residential uses to the north. Residential development within the area of concern would ! II need adequate recreational areas, schools, and commercial establishments. Central Park and Library and sufficient iy commercial activity exist within one-half mile of the property. Several elementary schools are also located within one-half mile of the site but arterial crossings ! would be necessary. A low density designation would generate more students than would a medium density de- velopment. At a maximum of seven units per acre, single � + A family development adds 197 elementary and 66 high school ; students to the local school systems, whereas medium � I density development at 15 units per acre generates 186 elementary and 44 high school students. �. 2.3.3 Recommendation �• I The area of concern north of Talbert Avenue and east of } Gothard Street should be redesignated medium density sj residential. 2. 4 Gothard Street, South of Heil Avenue 2.4.1 Background The property consists of 47.76 acres south of Heil Avenue and extending along Gothard Street to the Orange County Flood Control District Channel (see Figure 2-5) . The to site is curr?ntly zonad M1 and designated light industrial by the General Plan Land Use Element. Across Heil Avenue to the north lye a small industrial park and storage facility, and vacant Ml property. To the west are apartments (R3) and the Park View Elementary School. The southern boundary consists of apartments (R3) and a w drive-in theater. Single family subdivisions abut the area of concern on the east. The property owner has requested that the pro arty be redesignated low density residential. 11 - - J v -0 z w n r4- a7 N 3' NANCY W ;HT * OR. LI GHT I MDU TR I AL OX ' HIM ii - A ` i I I � --------- J7 r DAPOUK u J OR D •'� Z C F- a n RHWJZ C L A 16AP10"CR �F R x ,, C 0. r' T UI'mmi OR N I J _ a j r Q AASMINGTON AVt J x ELK CR. 01 z r RETAIL z J AREA OF CONCERN 2.4 SOUTH Of HEIL AVENUE AND EAST i WEST OF GOTHARD STREET 12 FIGURE 2-5 N ° 1 i 2.4. 2 Analysis There is little question that the area of concern would make a good low density residential area. The surrounding land uses are compatible and even the industrial uses to the north across Heil Avenue are of low intensity. However, the property is also excellent for industrial use. The Industrial Land Use Study determined that, all A industrial properties to the north of Warner Avenue are among the best industrial sites in Huntington Beach. Freeway and arterial access are excellent. Topography is flat with no local drainage problems. Probably more important, the entire 48 acres is under a single owner- ship. These areas should be the very last along the �w Central Industrial Corridor to be redesignated to other uses. In addition, the Planning Commission's 'diiection to pursue a minimum land reduction alternative implies the retention of industrial sites north of Slater Avenue. 2. 4.3 Recommendation The area of concern along Gothard Street and south of Heil Avenue should retain its light industrial designation. 2.5 North of Heil Avenue and West of Gothard Street 2. 5. 1 Background The area of concern consists of 18. 83 acres of vacant land at the northwest corner of Heil Avenue and Gothard Street (Figure 2-6) . The property is presently zoned M1 and designated for industrial use by the General Plan Land �i Use Element. The parcel is surrounded to the north and east across Gothard Street by existing industrial uses and a fire station. The industrially designated land to the south across Heil Avenue is presently used for agriculture, and single family hom^s abut the subject property to the west. The property owner has requested A that the land use designation be changed from industrial to medium density residential to accommodate a mobile home park. 2.5.2 Analysis ® Although the Industrial Land Use Study indicates there is a surplus of industrial land within the City and recommends reduction of some of the acreage, the sites north of Warner Avenue have been identified as the most attractive locations in the Gothard Corridor for future industrial development. Elimination of surplus a -age IP should occur in less desirable locations. 13 M EDINGER n LODGE cm T' DR=L-U Y. M Il Y 5n. AMIAI^OH ` CF•C l�aae � = IGE Y INDUSTRIALANl7A x <> t r Ow t .. NANCY ..fY,• W DR. ALHAMBRA Ba HE IL r �2 TA QA,11UaE r � 2 LIGHT IdDUSTRIAL p SEW v (� 2 AREA OF CONCERN 2.5 4 NORTH OF HEIL AVENUE AND WEST OF GOTHARD STREET 14 Affft FIGURE 2-6 rip A Since the area of concern is surrounded on three sides by existing industrial uses and vacant M1 land, retention A of the present industrial land use designation would provide for the most compatible development. The in- tensity of industrial uses in the immediate area and the y arterial traffic these uses generate could create noise problems for residents if the area of concern is de- veloped residential. A 2.5. 3 Recommendation The area of concern north of Heil Avenue and west of Gothard Street should retain its light industrial designation. st 2.6 South of the San Diegc Freeway and East of San Angelo Drive 2.6.1 Background The subject property consists of approximately 7.77 acres of land and i.s located on the south £ide of the San Diego Freeway at the east end of San Angelo Drive (Figure 2-7) . The subject property is presently designated planning reserve under the Land Use Clement. The Planning Department is requesting that the A study area be redesignated high density residential. 2.6.2 Analysis The Planning Reserve land use designation is designed to allow the City time to carry out an analysis and study 0 of the possible land uses for a piece of property prior to identifying a specific land use designation. The subject property is presently general planned, Planning Reserve with a zoning classification of R3, High Density Residential. 2n February, 1976, the current property owner filed Use Permit 76-12 for the development of 193 ! apartment units. The Use Permit was initially denied by the Board of Zoning Adjustments and the Planning Com- mission. An appeal was initiated by the property owner to the City Council for consideration. The Use Permit teas conditionally approved by the City Council on � ,Tune 7, 1976. • :in light of the approved development plans, there is no longer any reason to maintain this property under the planning reserve designation. In order to bring the property into conformance with present density levels, .it is necessary to change the planning reserve desig- • nation to high density. 15 O IAL s DENSI�Y r c C q m RETA L00 J DENSITY STARK AVE ,..........:::: I', pA //gy�pp ....t..;•.;.}.t.}::::•i:..i:::.... h,h ' G 0' �. C. F G. 0. .= o Q W N H _ _ wL a� t -1 �"1 • r"?'q I ;P Cr' CI Y 1 f T'��"T?'"► T"T'CT�""1 . 0 . 1 f i' AREA OF CONCERN 3,6 SOUTH OF THE SAN DIEGO FREEWAY i EAST OF SAN ANGELO DRIVE 16 "''""""•'� FIGURE 2~7 2.6. 3 Recommendation 1► The area of concern south of the San sego Freeway and east of San Angelo should be redesignated high density residential. ' 2.7 South of warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street A 2.7.1 Background The area of concern encompasses 16. 48 acres, located between Warner and Los Patos Avenues, and extending from Bolsa Chica Street to Creentree Street (Figure 2-8) . The study area is currently designated low density resi- dential. The property includes approximately sixteen single family homes, a mushroom nursery and vacant land. Existing land uses to the north consist of retail commercial and office professional. Also, to the north, across Warner Avenue, is Meadowlark Airport. Land use to the east is medium density residential which currently has approved on it Tentative Tract 9235. The property to the south is currently designated high density (R3) and is partially developed with apartments. Use Permit 75-65 has been approved for development of the remainder of the vacant R3 property. To the west immediately across golsa Chica Street are high densI ty residential apartments (R3) and retail commercial uses. Requests have been received from some of the property owners within the study area asking that the land use designation be changed from low density to medium density residential. This area of concern has been w previously addressed in General Plan Amendment 76-2 and 76-3 at which time the Planning Commission continued the matter requesting that a detailed study of residential uses in the area be undertaken before amending the land use designation. The issues that need to be analyzed are compatibility with surrounding land uses and the availability of facilities such as open space and schools that would support an increase in residential density. 2.7.2 Analysis The commercial and office professional designations to the 'N north provide a logical separation of the study area from Warner Avenca, a major arterial highway. The medi•,m. density residential to the east and the high density to the south would be compatible with a medium density land use designatinn on the properties within the study area. M 17 r• r' Q� r +4 : 4 �- u �' albw 7T 71 It + I I r� S T. h N N I ST. ME NS I TY EL ;•Q�1 r � I., .E i d41RlENE 07 � i z � + �ST WARNER' AVE � N 1 N Sj :. . W F1 :a f . -- LMO OR.5 DENSITY z "NS ITY 217,1 �• GLEhROy h2gsITY P < = I HIGH DENSITY 4���v KENILW"TH Nr. AVE ♦ single Family Residence .M Developed Property AREA OF CONCERN 2.7 R©LEA CHICA STREET SOUTH OF WARN►R AVENUE i EAST OF BOLSA CHICA STREET FIGURE 2-8 + i A question is raised with regard to the compatibility of residential development within the study area with the �► operation of Meadowlark Airport. Concern has been voiced by the Airport Land Use Commission concerning probable sight and sound disturbances to future inhabitants within the study area. Aircraft presently avoid flying directly over the study area. However, additional residential development can the property would still be �► affected by aircraft noise from planes taking off and would be expcsed to the hazard of planes failing while attempting to take off. The City Council at its January 17, 1977 meeting deleted the condition for placement of a blast fence at the north end of the ?•Meadowlark runway. This action by the City Council will allow the A planes an additional 150-200 feet of runway for take-off. This will allow the planes to be at a higher altitude when flying in the vicinity of the subject property, thus reducing the sight and sound disturbances. A water and sewer assessment district has been formed �+ for these properties that front on Dunbar Street, a private street, that extends through the study area. The projected sizes for the water (611) and sewer lines (8") will be able to accommodate low or medium density residential development. The lots that front on Bolsa Chica Street will take water and sewer access directly A off existing lines extending down Bolsa Chica Street. Storm drainage will be accommodated by street flow down Dunbar Street to Bolsa Chica Street which has storm drain facilities. Another consideration when analyzing this property for residential development is the availability of supporting facilities (open space and schools) . If the entire 16.48 acres are designated medium density, a maximum population of 600 persons could be generated. The Open Space and Conservation Element identifies the area bounded by Slater Avenue, Graham Street, Warner Avenue and Bolsa * Chica Street as being deficient in neighborhood park land by 1.6 acres. The requested change from low density to medium density residential will intensify this park deficiency to 2. 3 acres. If the land use is changed to medium density residential, effort should be directed toward securing a neighborhood park site. The seven acre parcel of land lying immediately behind the parcels on the south side of Dunbar Street and north of the proposed R3 high density development (UP 75-65) was once a land fill dump site. In order for development to occur on this seven acre parcel, extensive excavation of the parcel would have to be carried out. The parcel 19 t+ ' i may be in a good location for development of .a neighbor- hood park. The area of concern as well as the surrounding properties have need for a park site and recreational facilities. The ocean view School District has indicated that as the n area south of Warner Avenue develops and the school age population in the area e::pands, the school district would construct an elementary school on an existing school site located w'.thin the area owned by Signal Landmark. Properties, Inc. The City may wish to explore the possibility of an adjoining neighborhood r . park site to provide the needed recreational facilities for the area of c-,ncern and the surrounding properties. In conclusion, the Planning Commission believes that the lack of supporting facilities such as a park site, school., and sewers and the sight and sound disturbances from r Meadowlark Airport provide ample support for retaining the low density residential land use. 2.7.3 Recommendation Tho area of concern south of Warner Avenue and east of r. Holsa Chica Street should be retained as low density residential. 2. 8 South of Hamilton Avenue and West of Magnolia Street ' 2.8.1 Background The site is located at the southwest corner of Hamilton Avenue and Magnolia Street isee Figure 2-9) . A request to change the present general plan designation of light industrial to low density residential was received in �. January, 1977. The area of request comprises approxi- mately 47.16 acres. It contains a former rotary mud pit and scattered ail production facilities. The area of request covers about 40 acres of which is occupied by the mud dump. The Planning Sta.f expanded the study area to include a 7 acre vacant parcel abutting the C Edison power easement and Hamilton Avenue. This was done to encourage compatible development within a logically defined area. c� 20 �► t� )1 AYF ATLA4iA ATLANTA I_ -- . —f"• jT-ITT i III _/ - -•-- .—.. P7-1 C F_R J -- (•-!Ri Yw Y•111N1) .rlr� J • , _ • � y m ..t:kfcm r r•: ?�1 ��S•• 1 - ��.� IN CF-F q � t Ci•R I � q AREA OF CONCERN 2.8 SOUTH OF HAMILTON A • WEST OF MAGNOLIA Aflft FIGURE 2-9 21 Edison Community Park and single family residences are located north of the site. These developments are separated by Hamilton Avenue and the east-west extension of the Edison right-of-way. To the east across Magnolia Street are single family subdivisions. The Edison generating plant abuts the property on the south and partially on the west across the Orange County Flood Control District Dl-1 Channel. Also across the channel are several small industrial businesses. The west side r of the property separated by the Edison power easement is bounded by a mini-warehouse opeartion. 2.8.2 Analysis The entire Edison Area had one of the lowest ratings in r suitability for industrial development. The Industrial Land Use Study found a variety of impediments to development. Great distance from freeway interchanges, incomplete arterial system, poor soil conditions, local drainage problems, and regional flood hazard were among the most significant factors. As a result, the Planning r Staff recommended that the Edison Area be phased out of the City's industrial land inventory. The area of concern more than any other site embodies the severest constraints to development in the Edison Area. The dump site occupies much of the request area and contains rotary muds, brine, and oil wastes to depths of 20 to 40 feet. r The analysis of the property must focus on low intensity uses, even assuming that soil and drainage problems are adequately addressed. Open space use of the property would be compatible with �r Edison Community Park to the north and recreational facilities at Mison High School. It would also be compatible with adjacent residences. However, the need for additional park space in the general area must seriously be questioned. With a community park and high school adjacent to the: site and the beach within one- r quarter mile, additional open space would be in excess of community and neighborhood requirements. It is doubt- ful that the City could purchase the entire site in the near future because of the scarcity of ftinds. Private open space wottld be an alternative but user and building intensity would still require the developer io deal with ' the mud dump at great expense. As a result, such a use of the property would be of marginal feasibility. 22 �I I A low density residential designation would be compatible with the park uses to the north and single family resi- dences across Magnolia Street. The Edison easement and the OCFCD channel serve as logical boundaries with the power plant and industrial uses to the west. Oil tanks are located to the south but at 200 foot setback from the property line. Chemical treatment of waste materials has been suggested by the property owner as a means of dealing A with the physical problems of the dump site. In addition, a planned development concept could be used to circumvent severe on-site problem areas and improve compatibility with industrial uses to the south and west. Low density residential use within the area of concern • would need adequate schools and commercial establishments. A sufficient supply of such facilities exists within one- half mile of the site. A low density residential designation may be premature at this time. The Southern California Edison Company has recently announced plans for the construction of a $750 million to $1 billion turbine power plant expansion at one of four proposed locations in Southern California, in- cluding Huntington Beach. It is uncertain whether the study area would be used for the plant expansion or merely purchased as a buffer zone. Until the plant expansion is settled, therefore, the area of concern should retain the existing light industrial designation. 2.e.3 Recommendation The area of concern south of Hamilton Avenue and west of Magnolia Street should retain its light industrial desig- nation. 2.9 South of Talbert Avenue, West of Beach Boulevard 2.9.1 Background A . The area of concern consists of approximately 11.11 acres bf land and is located on the south side of Talbert Avenue approximately 527 feet west of the centerline of Beach Boulevard (Figure 2-10) . The current General Plan land use designation within the area of concern is general industrial and general commercial with a zoning classification of M1-A, restricted manufacturing district, and C4, highway commercial district. A General Plan Amendment petition has been filed by a property owner, i s AtL 23 I I ��► 1 11 � � urrrl�r r ■ Nil I U . /rraw��r.re.�.rar�nrNs��� a■ • a Iltfrfl!lfltlll1rf111111trtttflHfllrlllfN 1111 U , IIIItIl111111111111111111111�11111111i{IlllllllllH • Irll11!l11t1111111t11t1�11111111111111t1It11tIt11A1 1 � �Illlltllillllllilltili ii111i11111t1111111111111U ,� IIIlllllllllllllllll 111111111f1{IIMIIf11lIIIIIf1A tlllltllllllllF�llill�lr►a1�111!IlnlUll(1111l111111 Hilliu ' II1l11II111111{11111l1111111l1111l11/11111111111111 �"'�"��"' 1111t111l1l1111lIIIIl1lllti1111r1111lI11ti111 IIf1 11111111I1111111�11111111111111lllllttlltllll�tllil IIr111111r111111 IIt11111I11!lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIA � 11r1111111111/l111111I11111111/1111111111111111111��� � � Illttlllll!l1111l1tlltllllllllltll11111111111111111� � llllllll11lll{1l111111!lllllllllllllllillltllU 1/!_ 1 1 I UM 11111111111111111! 111111111ltllllll1111111�111111 1 1!llltll1111lIt111�11/1 lIAl1111111l1!!1lllitltlil{1 DENSIT 11l1lIIIIIIIIIAIIlIIIII�IIIllllllllillil!!1ltrl1111 r = A ���„ , 111111111111111111IIl11111111111111111111[I11t111tA 1 � Iu1r11111111IH1lHtlilllirlllrlllt1I1111111rI1A � �� INI111111111 loll 13i1{l!!IAI IAIIIIIIIIIHI111111111 - IH1111111111I1111111111111111111{Itlllllllllr11I11 1 111111l11111111111111111�111111111111111111l1111111 KIWI tlt,t,l�ltftru,„rtrrftl ,lltllflrtflrfltftfllftfff� .. � Jh JhSSM1•JJ�k'S .•J�'.'.:..'ATMµ Y�.ti1'4ti1^." V.'. .r..r► wrrYwMw srrrw�*.raw� ■wiwww• +swrRr�iiiwwvr�ru�wrarrarwM.�w swr�wsrir ..rrrw rwMr. rrrs rrrn.10 ,rrrr.�• wrrru..•wwy.r rwr� ►wrwreuwwrw�IrMrr.�r.rrirrf-rwr�wrr ■rr�rTirw• aq/fAMM�MYwflq/r111A9MrrM 1Mw�Ml/ a.'r rrwr«.ww•ww rrww...+ .r..r.��.� rr��ttMff:lWrtwwr/Y11► rl�kMMIM rrwyrMMrrr/�r +r+�r�wat-.wrrr,rr �www�arw.rMrrrr+rrr�■ wrrr.w1."uwrMrwrw»rrwMwMr�+wwr .rrrrr�.rrwr• nr•.►wF MMrMIrI MrMrI}�1rA �rrlr. M/Ilr".MrrO rr rwal• ?M Mw1 si/�orr►=writ A/ �M/M�NIR+'����r���/ w rr r.l wwir rw rr ar wnWr.r�: -+Mw....r•r rww � � .rwurw�iirM wrww l�i .ww .wwr• rr rwr�w 1 artwr/twtrrrwMrw�iartrr�wutAr« r..rw+wMnrwrprr sarrrwlrwwrn M. ON on�M=�Mf w..w460r.Mr�+r�... .».. Mr Mr NM r1M w M.111 .,.yr 4+..r r+wwrnw w� wwe rw aw r.w.... M� rrr4rtlr M�.t wfM MEM►r M' MMr rtMttrr rrt arts rrrr MN}M NOW . Mr4mtw rr"Wrtt�tt irw aron-"Mrrw�.�.i►1' 11r�trlM.ltt r►/M MI Nteww�M��M1r.rt!�wlMt� t r . vivo r ■Billy �Am I ON1 M1■ lrl Il ■r � - r � � lrr rl r : • r � ♦ y I �A I requesting that 4 .50 acres be changed from general indus- trial to either low density (for a condominium: development) or medium density residential (for apartment development) . The Planning Department has increased the area- of concern to include the additional encyclopedia lots, approximately 7.31 acres, that lie adjacent to the property the petiti- oner has requested for a land use amendment. This has been A done with the intent of encouraging development of com- patible land uses within the general area. The area of concern has located upon it nine older single family dwelling units. The majority of the property is vacant. The area of concern is bounded on the north by Talbert Avenue, with multiple family units across Talbert, to A t e east y general commercial, new sTiopp nag cenfe`r anc!` medical complex) and by vacant general industrial land to the west and vacant low density residential land­to t?ie_ ~ south. e! 2. 9.2 Analysis In analyzing a change of land use from general industrial to residential, an analysis of municipal facilities that would support residential land use within the area of concern are addressed as well as a discussion of why the �► area is no longer suited for a general industrial land use designation. The area of concern, if developed residential, would have access to B" water and 8" sewer lines which are presently within the Talbert Avenue right-of-way. The size of the A lines are designed to adequately accommodate a change to residential land uses. The Public Works_Aepartment has indicated that a storm_dran, would have to be extendedgac�t _ gm;edando�Ci.rcle to th'e area o£ con erP t0 assure roper ,drainage. The Prea of concern has a sufficient amount of park acreage to justify an increase of residential land uses. To the south, fronting on Taylor Street is a 5 acre un- developed neighborhood park site(Terry Park Site) scheduled for development this fiscal year. Also, the area of concern lies approximately 1/2 mile from ' A Huntington Central Park with access provided along i Talbert Avenue. If the area of concern was changed from general manu- facturing to low density or medium density residential a maximum. of 7 and 15 units per acre respectively would r, 25 be^permitted, resulting in the construction of 83 low density residential units or 177 medium density residential units. An increase in population would result r from a change to a residential land use. A low density residential land use would generate an estimated 286 persons. A medium density residential land use change would generate an estimated 451 persons. The lower density would approximate the lower density residantial character of the developments to the south. �^ The area of concern lies within the Oceanview Elementary School. District. A change in land use to low density residential would generate an estimated 109 elementary school aged children. A medium density land use would generate an estimated 71 elementary school aged children. r The School District Administrative offices have indicated that these children would under present circumstances attend Crestview or`-Lakev3"sw Elementary`Schools, or"be bused to schools having available space. The Oceanview Eler-antary School District has no plans to purchase land r, for a new school site near the area of concern. If sub- stantial land use changes are undertaken along the Gothard Street Industrial Corridor, the School District may have tv, reassess the school needs. The area of concern is also served by the Huntington Beach High School district. A low or medium density residential Land use change would generate an estimated 24 and 11 students respectively. These students would attend Oceanview High School which is located approximately 1-1/2 miles from the aria of concern. r The area of concern was analyzed in the Industrial Land Use Study to determine the desirability of continuing to designate the property with a general industrial land use. The Industrial Land Use Study suitability criteria gave the area a low overall rating for use as industrial lan3. The_,ot__and_ownerghtp_.considerations created the most serious problem fpr continued_gs3xieal_,industrial: Alsa;'freeway access and utilities and municipal services contributed to the undesirableness of continuing the property as general industrial. 2.9. 3 Recommendation The area of concern south of Talbert Avenue, west of ` Beach Boulevard should be redesignated low density residential. is 26 V- I lot i 1 3.0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 3.1 Proposed Amendment 77-1, Area of Concern Summaries The following sections summarize the recommended changes in General Plan land use designations for the affected areas. I.f no change is recommended, the area is not discussed. All changes are shown in Figure 3-1. 3.1.1 South of Ellis Avenue and West of Huntington Street The 7.14 acre study area should be redesignated from light industrial to medium density residential. Proposed Land Use Acreage Summary Category Gross Acres M Medium Density Residential 7 .14 Projected Population Residential Gross Maximum Total Population Estimated Type Acres Units/gac Units Per Unit Population Medium 7.14 x 15 = 107 x 2.35 252 Density Adolk 27 I i l 3. 1.2 North of Slater AVenue and %lest of Gothard Street The 4.87 acre study area should be redesignated from light ,.. industrial to low density residential. Proposed-Land Use Acreage _Summary_ Category Gross Acres r. Low Density Residential 4.87 Projected Population Residential Gross Maximum Total Population Estimated ' Type Acres Uni.ts;gac Units Per Unit Population Low 4.87 x 7 = 34 x 3. 45 - 117 Density 3.1.3 North of Talbert Avenue and East of Gothard Street The 38.7 acre study area should be redesignated from light industrial to medium density residential. Proposed Land Use Acroagje Summary_ Category Gress Acres Mediiun Density Residential 38.7 Projected Population Residential. Grows Maximum Total Population Estimated _ Type Acres Units qac Units Per Unit Population Medium 38.7 x 15 _ 581 x 2.35 a 11365 Density 3.1.4 South of San Diego Freeway and East of San Angelo Drive: The 7.77 acre study area should be redesignated from planning reserve to high density residential. ` I Proposed Land Use Acreage Summary Category Gross Acres C , High Density Residential 7.77 28 r, �..j I I eY`-•- .l:I'�-r=tom _ � 't4.• _ _�4 .!� . _, _ .. - .ti '^ - *� 4� 11% s� • • jp. `- a J •i ! 1 a * n►tnc m►sr MvrT - FuLwe 3-1 Aft LEGEND ADCRED FiU�IG70N 86ACN.pLFORrUtA RESIDENTIAL �^ PL4NN 1V� D� Law Density 0-7 un/gac GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 7 7-1 ! = Medium Density 8-15 un/gac High Density above 15 un/'gac 4 3. 1. 5 South of Talbert ".venue and West of Beach Boulevard r, The 11. 81. acre area of concern should he redesignated from light industrial and commercial to low density residential. I Proposed Land Use Acreage Summary i Category Gross Acres Low Density Residential 11.81 Projected Population r+� Residential Gross Maximum Total Population Estimated Type Acres Units/gar. Units Per Unit Population Low 11.81 x 7 = 83 x 3.45 = 206 Density 3.2 Proposed Summary of General Plan Amendment 77-1 A Proposed Land Use Acreage Summary Existing Proposed Net Land Use Category Gross Acres Gross Acres Gross Acres I't Rersider tial Low Density 0 16.68 . 16.68 Medium Density 0 ,4b.84� -45.89 High Density 0 7.77 7.77 Commercial r.--tail 2.24 0 - 2.24 Industrial Light 60.28 0 60.28 Others Planning Reserve 7.77 0 - 7.77 Total land involved in the Amendment: 70.29 gross acres. j 29 0 1 r Net Projected Population Residential Net Gross Maximum 'Dotal Population Estimated Tier Units/gac Units Per Unit Pop�a�n Residential Low Density 16.68 7 - 117 x 3. 45 = 404 Medium Den- sity 45.84 x 15 - 688 x 2, 35 = 1,61i - High Density 7.77 x 35 272 x 2. 13 -- 579 Total: 21600 I r I r 30 lipr; �l h f i �1 A 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 4.1 Introduction The Environmental Impact Report for the proposed amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element has been prepared by the Plan Develop- ment Section of the City of Huntington (leach Planning Department. 4.1.1. Planning Area The proposed plan amendment is located in the northwestern � i section of Orange County, California, in the City of Huntington Beach, as shown in Figure 4-1. The amendment includes nine concern areas throughout the City, encom- passing a total of 200.52 acres (Figure 2-1) . Only seven sites covering 133.93 acres are recommended for change in land use desicnation. 4.1.2 Project Description The proposed project is an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The amendment studies areas where changing conditions require reconsideration of past 31. • Sao ^ •ta.a.sc dp a�u ......� : adasaw t• Q 4 .t.• roi ... O � � ___ as rrt. �' _ •----- Y �Te f•n ilr+etset �'t • .• t .••c µo sa. �nMt t�.. � - t.an O: �•� f F a+ta t� .�•...•...� �` y %a. r0 C.n• Asa.. J.•• r wn � t•.., :. rQ \ •saes• ,. �•t4•ar .a,..• �- ter..: i _= l aKp t7 � O ha I_ $"I&we+ta 0tr • 1f 3C i�[Ntl Kf =0 b aaa 0 �. ,T� t ' ` �.....• a.ra•t !CS ANGELES WCj �yB swat• Da•a.aa ra»!GE G�uHT• f'% a Q p' r - n IuuteTTt 57 O 1 Cr, ,rawar.0 at. (1 H 9i ` a.atr••. 91 9 t .ltWY staVO i f+'•J` •t! O cl *49~ad •a..%.lsKa •� • 1 • t a•a•t :AL vet' UtiE t ."a �•-::•« ' hurt fig toll c.• � A I- ts•a • zZ Y••a Cp G o C • ,. PINK ^fin �--�.r• '`� `:.':...... - f FIGURE 4—I . VICINITY MAP sGJi T.•rraTs of \ � Q HUNTINGTON BEACH 0 decisions, establishing land use policy accordingly. A description of the specific concern areas and proposed actions follow. 4.1.2.1 South of Ellis Avenue and West of Huntington Street The area of concern contains 7.14 acres and is bounded by Ellis Avenue on the north, medium density planned develop- ment on the east, vacant and developed industrial on the r' south, and vacant industrial on the west. This amendment proposes redesignation from light industrial to medium density residential. 4.1.2.2 . North of Slater Avenue and West of Gothard Street The area of concern contains 4. 87 acres and is bounded by the city Corporation 'card on the north, Gothard Street on the east, Slater Avenue and the General Telephone Maintenance Yard on the south, and vacant low density residential on the west. This amendment proposes that the existing light industrial designation be changed to low density residential. 4.1.2. 3 North of Talbert Avenue and Last of Gcthard Street The area of concern contains 38.7 acres, and is bounded off► the north by vacant and ceveloped industrial, medium density apartments on the east, Talbert Avenue on the south, and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way on the west. This amendment proposes redesignation from light industrial to medium density residential. 4.1.2.4 Gothard. Streetr South of Heil Avenue The area of concern contains 47.76 acres, and is bounded � by Heil Avenue on the north, the Southern Pacific Rail- road right-of-way and low density residential on the east, medium density residential and a flood control channel on the south, and a school and medium density residential � M on the west. This amendment proposes that the existing light industrial designation be retained. i 4.1.2.5 North of Heil Avenue and West of Gothard Street The area of concern contains 18.83 acres, and is bounded N by a fire station and industrial development on the north, Gothard Street, and developed industrial on the east, Heil .Avenue on the south, and low density resi- dential on the west. This amendment proposes that the existing light industrial designation be retained. .33- 4.1.2.6 South of the San Diego Freeway and East of San Angelo Drive The area of concern contains 7.77 acres, and is bounded i on the north and east by the San Diego Freeway, medium density residential on the west, and the City boundary on the south. This amendment proposes redesignation from planning reserve to high density residential. The proposed change has received prior environmental approval on r, J June 7, 1976, under Negative Declaration 76-11. i 4.1.2.7 South of Warner Avenue and East of Bolsa Chica Street The .:es of concern contains 16.48 acres, and is bounded � on the north by commercial and office professional uses, on the east by medium density residential under construc- tion, high density residential on the south and Bol.sa Chica Street on the west. This amendment proposes redes- ignation from low density residential to medium density residential. r I 4.1.2.8 South of Hamilton Avenue and West of Magnolia Street I The area of concern contains 47.16 acres, and is bounded on the north by Hamilton Avenue and a park, on the east by single family residences, and on the south and west by the Southern California Edison Power Plant and indns-- r j trial businesses. The Edison Plant and :he developed l industrial are separated from the site by a flood control channel and an Edison power line easement. This amendment proposes redesignation from light industrial to low density residential. 4.1.2.9 South of Talbert Avenue and West of Beach Boulevard The area of concern contains 11.81 acres, and is bounded on the north by Talbert Avenue, on the east by a shopping center under construction and a medical facility, on the scuth by low density residential, and on the west by v-, .nt industrial. This amendment proposes redesignation from light industrial to low density residential. 4.1.3 Project objectives Genera? Flan Amendment 77-1 is designed to investigate some areas where changing conditions require recons1 ,v tion of past decisions. Most of the amendment reque-ts-a involve industrial areas. The disposition of these properties reflect the results of the land requirement and suitability analysis presented in the Industrial. Land Use Study, Parts I (June, 1976) and II (February, 1977) . 34 q 4.1.4 Methodology To determine changes generated by the amendment, potential development under proposed land uses will be compared to potential development under existing use designations. Only those areas of concern having recommended land use changes will be evaluated. Areas of retained designation will not be discussed. Concern Area 2.6 (south of the 4 � San Diego Freeway and east of San Angelo Drive) will also not be analyzed, since it has already been approved under i Negative Declaration 76-11. The environmental assessment will focus on concerns developed in the initial study. Where there is little or no effect, it will be so indi- cated in the report. ! 4. 2 Environmental Setting I� 4.2.1 Natural Environmental Setting I Huntington Beach is a metropolitan city and, as such, jos 4ts environment - both local and regional - is primarily j an urban one. Even in this urban area, however, natural resources remain. The following sections reference the land, water, air., biological, and cultural resources in the City. 4.2.1.1 Land Resources A general description of the land resources in the City is presented in Section 6. 4.1 of the Land Use Element: Phase Il and updated in Section 6.3.2.1 of the Se Ismc Sam-Element2 of the General Plan. Additional'Unrorma- � ^� t on is contained in the Conservation Potentials Re ort,3 Sections 2.1 and 3.0; 0 en S ace Patent als Re ort, Sectioua 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0; Geotec n ca Inputs, and Flood Hazard Study.6 '� 4.2.1.2 Water Resources rQ A general description of the water recources in the City is presented in Section 6.4.2 of the Land Use Element: Phase I7 (as modified by EIR addendum 0, Dece er , 97� 3)and updated in Section 6.3.2.2 of the Seismic- Sa�£etX Element8of the General Plan. Additional` n urma- tion is cited in the Conservation Potentials he ort,9 Sections 2.2 and 3.0; Open Space Potent al Sections 2.1.11 2.4.21 and 4.0; Floodzar Stu 1 and Fira Hazard/Fire Protection Stay,-Section 4.3. 4.2.1. 1 Air Resources A general description of the air resources in the City is presented in Section 6 .3 of the Land Use Elenent: l � i n Phase I13 and updated in Section 6.3. 2. 3 of the Seis mic- Sa ety Element.11 Additional discussion of air re:sources is presentedlin the Conservation Potentials Re ort, Section 2 .3. 4.2.1.4 Biological Resources A general description of the biological resources in the City i.sleresented in Section 6. 4.4 of the Land Use Element: r Phase I and uVated in Section 6.3.2.4 of the Seismic: Safet.yY Element. Additional discussion and species r listings are availabH in the Conservation Potentials Report, Section 2.4. 4.2.1.5 Cultural Resources A description of the cultural resources in the City is presentyO in Section 6. 3.2.5 of the Seismic�Saf2I (, Element of the General Plan. Additional information is c ted in conservation_ P entitle Re ort,20 Section 2. 5. Open S ace Potentials, Section 2. .5, 2.1.6� and 2.3; ,- and Scientific Resources Surveyand Inventor!. 2 4.2.2 Urban Environmental Setting This portion of Section 4 .0 addresses the urban or man- made environmental setting. The major topics covered are: (1) land use, (2) circulation, (3) public services, (4) utilities, (5) population, (6) noise, and (7) socio- economics. 4.2.2.1 Land Use A description of the existing land uses in the individual ented in Section 2.0 of the proposed study areas is eras General Plan Amendment 77-1, March, 1977.23 4. 2.2.2 Circulation A general description of existing circulation in the City res is P tad n Se ction ection 2. 3 of the Land Use Element: Phase 14 and u dated in the Circulat on E ement Back- grounaReport,2g agrJd The General Plan or t e C ty o Huntington Beach.2 4.2.2.3 Public Services A. Volice Service Police protection for the City is provided from one station. This station is located in the south central section of the City at Hair Street and Mansion Avenue. 36 lip C) ON The present level of police manning is about 1.14 officers per 1 ,000 persons (.Tune, 1976) . n B. Fire Protection Huntington Beach maintains seven fire stations to provide fire protection to the City. The manning rate is approximately one fireman per 1, 120 persons. h C. Schools The following school districts provide educational services for the City of Huntington Beach. h Elementary Huntington Beach City Ocean View Fountain Valley Westminster Seal Beach High School Huntington Beach Union e� College Coast Community The public school system is supplemented by several private schools, most of which are parochial. At present, the Huntington Beach school system could withstand an increase in school children population of 3,385. The increase in total City population relating t this increase In school. population would be 13,596,g7 ea D. Library Service The Huntington Beach Central Library is located on Talbert Avenue east of Goldenwest Street. Thrre supporting library annexes are located at 9251 Banning Street, the corner of Edinger Avenue and Graham Street, and at 525 Main Street. An annex has a service area of 1� to 2 miles. E. Hospital. Service M There are two hospitals located within the City. Both Pacifica Hospital (located on Delaware Street north ~37 of Garfield Avenue) and Huntington Intercomnunity Hospital (located at Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue) provide 24--hour emergency service. F. Parks and Beaches The City of Huntington Beach contains 350 acres of parks. Acres r Neighborhood 123 Community 56 Regional 171 TOTAL 350 acres Huntington Beach also contains 315 acres of beach, with an additional 36 acres abutting the City's northwest corner, Sunset Beach, under County juris- diction. r For further information on all City parks and beaches, rafer to the Open Space and Conservation Element Background Report, Sect on 5.0, tie Conservation Potentials Report, Section 2.5, and t e Olen Space Potentials Report," .Section 2.0. 4.2.2. 4 Utilities A. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company supplies natural gas to S:he City of Huntina,gn Beach. Yearly consump- tion rates are as follows: Residen�:ial Single-family 122,000 cu.ft./d.u. Multiple--family 95,000 cu.ft./d.u. Con;mercial 250,000 uu,ft./d.u. Industrial 250, G00 cu.ft./d.u. Current natural gas usage in the City is estimated at 6 billion cu. ft. per year. .. 38 '1 B. Electricity r+ The Southern California Edison Company provides electricity to the City of Huntington Beach. The following annual consumption rates are assumed Residential h Single-family 5700 kwh/d.u. Multiple-family 5700 kwh/d.u. Commercial 500,000 kwh/gr.ac. Industrial 500,OOo kwh/gr.ac. ra Current usage of electricity in the City is estimated at 612 million kwh per year. y C. Sewer Sewer service in contracted for through the City as a member of the Orange County Sanitation District. Assuming an overall generation rate of 120 gal/person/ day,33 current sewage production in the City is estimated at 22.7 million gallons per day or 8. 3 billion gallons per year. /1 D. Solid Waste Solid waste pick-up in Ituntingtun Beach is provided by the Rainbow Disposal Company. After collection, ' the trash is delivered to the Orange County Transfer Station on Gothard Street near Huntington Central Park. The trash is then transferred to larger trucks + and hauled to the Coyote Canyon landfill1 site. The following generation rates are assumed:34 M Residential 5.5 lbs/person/day Commercial 75 lbs/ac/day + Industrial 100 lbs/dc/day Current solid waste generation in the City is estimated at 488 tons per day or .178,000 tons per year. E. Water The City of Huntington Beach provides water to its residents, A CQUsumption rate of 150 gallons/person/ day is assumed.Jtl Current usage in the City is estimated at 22.7 million gal/day or 8.3 billion gallons per year. may....�...,,.,.......,,.. _-3 �M 4 i 4.2.2.5 Population The population of Huntington Beach is 151,500 (January, ,. 1976) . The current growth rite is less than 3 percent and is likely to be less than 2 percent in the flsture. This represents a decrease over previous years, down from 22 percent in the 1960's when growth in Huntington Beach was explosive. r^ The City's median age is 26 years. Recent data indicates the median age is increasing, however, because senior citizens are making up an increasingly larger share of the population. (Sets the Population Growth Element Background RP.Parl—L, 36 for further information. ) 4.2.2.6 Noise Noise sources in Huntington Beach are: highways and free- ways, railroads, airport and helicopter operations, residential/institutional sources, and oil pumping opera- tions. Noise contours showing existing noise levels for major transportation elementa are presented in the Noise Element Background Re ort.37 Major transportation eluments in Huntington Bea^ are as follows: (1) freeways and highways (2) railroaC operation (3) airport operations Using the noise contours together with the maximum noise levels presented in the Noise Element, potentially noise-- sensitive areas in Huntington Beach can be determined. Random noise sources are tested separately from constant noise sources like vehicle traffic and railroad and air- craft operations. A field measurement survey conducted by Wyle Laboratories found that trucks on arterial high- ways are responsibiin for the highest noise exposures in Huntington Beach. Sources producing the lowest noise levels were typically found in residential areas away from arterials, residential areas near arterials but with barrier walla, and in school areas. Generally, the single event noise :intrusions observed in Huntington Beach fell within the "acceptable': noise criteria, levels.39 4.2.2. 7 Socic-Economic Characteristics Because Huntington Beach is one of the newer residential communities in Orange County, it has attracted a mobile, affluent, and relatively young population. According to estimates for January, 1976, the median amily income for Huntington Beach residents is $16,276.35 For those 40 ON households reporting incomes in the 1973 Special Census, the median incomes by family size are as follows: n One member $ 81517 Two members 12,945 Three members 14,399 Four members 14,941 Five members 16,658 Six or more 15,614 The United States Department of Housing and Urban Develop-- raent uses the following criteria for classifying low and very low income households: (1) A family is low income if its annual income is less than 80 percent of the median income for that area as adjusted for family size. (2) A family is very low income if its annual income is less than 50 percent of the median income of that area as adjusted for family size. From estimate: of 1976 household incomes based on 1975 SLAG estimates, 13,303 households or twenty--five (25) percent of all households in Huntington Beach are classified as low income. Of these households, 6,283 families or 12 percent can be classified as very low 1 income. Ninety-five (95) percent of the population in Huntington Beach is Caucasian. The 1973 Special Census reported minority concentrations of 325 black; 4,034 Spanish surname; 11877 oriental; and 287 people of other racial or cultural backgrounds. 4.3 Environmental Impacts and Mitigating Measures �f 4.3.1 Land Resources NI 4. 3.1.1 Land Use The total effect of General Plan Amendment 77-1 will be to reduce potential intensity of industrial activities, and increase residential uses and/or densities in the areas of I •� concern. The following table summarizes the acreage change in land use designations: Existing Proposed 11 Light Industrial 107.44 _ 0 f ` General Commercial. 2.24 0 Low Density Residential 16.48 63.84 Medium Density Residential 0 62.32 Al A land use analysis is presented in Section 2.0 of this report for each of the areas of concern. The proposed uses generally improve the compatibility of the areas with surrounding land uses over the long-term. Short-term con- flicts may occur between residential. development and marginal industrial activity. However, in such areas where compatibility is questionable due to the transitional nature of uses, the amendment provides greater flexibility in dealing with problems peculiar to the area of concern. r The proposed uses also balance the need for housing in the City with the apparent over-supply of industrial space. The effect of this on surrounding uses will be to hasten the recycling of existing marginal industrial businesses to more compatible and higher revenue generating uses. These considerations are in effect mitigation measures. 4. 3.1. 2 Topography Topography within the study area is relatively flat. Elevations range from sea level to 100 feet above sea level. Regardless of whether the existing or proposed use designation is implemented, grading activity will modify the generally flat to rolling topography in order to accommodate development. However, to reduce the possibility of adverse impacts on the topographic land- scape in particular concern areas (Ar-:a 2.1 - south of Ellis Avenue and west of Huntington Street) , development plans should incorporate topographic variation with minimal grading and limited landform alteration. This is bent accomplished through residential uses by employment: of planned development concepts. The change from in- dustrial to residential is, therefore, essei,tiall;► a mitigation measure.. The City's natural. blufflines will not be affected by the proposed amendment. 4. 3. 1. 3 Soils The study areas contain a number of various types of sandy and clay soils. Expansive clay soils have the potential to cause serious damage to lightly loaded structures, pavements, driveways, sidewalks, etc. due to changed in moisture content. Study areas which are inland north of Talbert Avenue have major deposits of clay having moderate to high expansion potential.. Portions of the Rotary Mad Du.ap (Concern Area 2. 8) also have moderates to high expansion potentials. The study areas located on the Huntington Beach and Polsa Chico Mesas contain loamy soils of the Ramona series. The upper one to two feet may be considered as having lcw expansion potential, while the underlying soils have a moderate expansion potential. 41 d�K%, rim The study areas having low expansion potential are for + the most part located southeasterly of the Huntington Beach Mesa. The soils in this area are predominantly silty fine sands and sandy silts with about 6 to 7 per- cent clay size particles. To mitigate the potential hazard associated with expansive soils, soil engineers can be employed by the developer i to evaluate the problems and make proper design recommend- ations for individual structures. The location of peat and organic soils is shown in the Geotechnical Inputs Report, February 1974 Figure. 3-7. The only study area lying within identified locations of peat and organic soils is the Rotary Mud Dump (Concern Area 2.8) . This deposit represents an area where long- term and large settlement may occur and where, during major earthquakes, potential liquefaction of sub-soil and ground shaking may be anticipated. To mitigate the potential hazard, soils samples and borings should be performed for any development or structure to be located within or near this area. Compounding the peat problem at the Rotary Mud Dump site is the waste materials that have been deposited there in previous years. The dump occupies approximately 30 acres of land, and contains solid chemically inert wastes, all types of clay base rotary drilling muds, and wastewater brines from oil well operations. The disposal depth is 20 to 40 feet. Settlement and damage: could occur to structures and paved areas if not mitigated properly. The proponent proposes the application of a lime treatment that will theoretically solidify most of the waste materials. However, the unknown consistency cf substances below the surface may require some waste removal. to another. Class III solid waste disposal site in the County. ? Soil engineers should thoroughly investigate the site's problems, conduct sample borings, and make proper design recommendations for individual structures. Planned development concepts could also be employed to prevent the location of structures in problem areas. These measures would also mitigate liquefaction potential during seismic events and reduce possible loss of life. • Concern area 2.7 (south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street) also contains an old landfill occupying about six acres. The area was once used as a dump site for oil related waste ma�Arials. The wastes are solidified but soil engineers should conduct boring tests to evaluate the site's problems and make proper design recommendations prior to any construction. 43 �4 � 1 4. 3.1.4 Geologic Considerations Active faults within the City of Huntington Beach, known r specifically as the North Branch, Bolsa-Fairview and South Branch Faults, are all contain- -1 within the Newport- Inglewood Structural Zone. This fault zone enters the City in the Huntington Harbour area and extends in a south- easterly direction. Under the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zones Act, r Special Study Zones have been established within Huntington Beach. The General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach, December 1976, details these special Study zones on page 29 and sets forth guiding criteria. The only area of concern that is directly affected by the Special �► Study -'one is 2.7, located east of Holsa Ch.ica Street south of Warner Avenue. Concern areas 2.1 (south of Ellis Avenue and west of Huntington Street) and 2. 8 (south of Hamilton Street and west of Magnolia Street) are traversed by the Newport-Inglewood Fault: Zone but do not lie within the Special Study Zone. A The City's Department of Building and Community Develop- ment requires either an engineering geologist's analysis of construction sites or that buildings for human occupancy he designed to resist a seismic force equal to .186 gravity. These requirements are imposed for all dis- O cxetionary acts. Loss of life and structural damage is thereby reduced. 4.3.2 Water Resources 4. 3.2.1 Regional Flood Hazard Only area of concern 2. 8 (South of Hamilton Avenue and west of Magnolia Street) located in the Talbert Gap is subject to flooding in the 100- and 200-;rear storms. f This amendment would increase residential development ; in the flood plain by 30 dwelling units with a population IAj of 1,139 persons ovar the potential development to be generated by existing land use designations. Industrial + i acreage exposed to the regional flood hazard would be reduced by 47.16 acres. A program to minimize danger frost flooding was adopted f: by the City Council in October, 1974 as part of the Seismic-Safety Element (refer to Section 5.2 in the Seismic-Safety Element, Huntington Beach Planning bePartment) . Further, as a participant in the Federal Insurance Program Huntington Beach flood hazards are governed by the regulations iN+pafed by the Federal Insurance Administration. 44 k.. Ob Certain steps are also being taken to eliminate the flood hazard posed by the Santa Ana River. The United States Army Corps of Engineers has proposed a plan that would make the City (and all of Orange County) flood safe from the 200-year storm. it will be several years before the project can mitigate flood potential, however. In the meantime, development of flood hazard areas will be regu- lated by the programs for flood hazard abatement in the ^ adopted Seismic-Safety Element. 4. 3. 2.2 Local Drainage and Groundwater In terms of the flooding potential from local channels, all areas of concern would be subject to local surface ^ drainage problems during heavy rains or storms in excess of the 25-year. Development of vacant areas will result in decreased ground percolation and increased surface runoff. Under 25-year storm conditions, full development- according to this amendment would reduce storm runoff by approximate) 8.7 cubic feet per second below that generated by develop- ment under the existing plan. Under these conditions, the City's Public Works Department indicates that local surface drainage can be accommodated by existing and proposed drainage facilities. However, the concern areas along Talbert Avenue (2.3-north of Talbert Avenue and east of Gothard Street, and 2.9 - south of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard) are currently unserviced. The change in designation from industrial to residential will hasten the need for drainage facilities in the area. Groundwater level is very important in a coastal city like Huntington Beach (subject to salt water intrusion) which relies on groundwater -as a major source of domestic water. H The amount of percolation will be reduced by development j under the Land Use Amendment. Less percolation will mean decreased fresh groundwater storage and possible increased 1 salt water intrusion. 04 Runoff is characteristically of poor quality and can adversely affect surface water. It is probable that runoff from development will flow into the Bolsa Chica wildlife preserve, the ocean, and fresh water bodies in the City. Primary pollutants would include vehicle hydrocarbons, greases, oil, rubber, plastics, asbestos, 14 paint, industrial metal fragments from paved surfaces, and fertilizers and pesticides from landscaped areas. 45 I Control of urban runoff and its impact on regional water quality is still in the elementary stages. At present, the only effective mitigation measure is to process such runoff in a sewage treatment facility. 4. 3. 3 Biological Resources Two of the study areas recommended for change are partially developed, thus the proposed land use designation changes r will have minimal impact upon vegetation and wildlife in these areas unless existing structures and trees are removed prior to new development. These are study areas 2.7 (south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street) and 2.9 (south of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boule- vard) . All of the sites except the Rotary Mud Dump r (concern area 2. E) are primarily characterized by low growing weeds, all other vegetation having been previously removed. Development of these sites will have minimal adverse effect on the biological environment, including the displacement or elimination of wildlife species. Concern areas 2. 1 (south of Ellis Avenue and west of Huntington street) and 2. 9 support a number of large eucalyptus trees, which could be :removed if the land is developed under the new land nse designations. These effects can be mitigated through landscaping requirements. 4. 3. 4 Cultural Resources Two of the study areas recommended for change have been identified by Archaeological Research Incorporated as archaeologically significant sites. These are located in study areas 2.2 (north of Slater Avenue and west of Gothard Street) and 2.7 (south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica) . The development of these areas may adversely affect the sites unless regulatory policies are enforced through cluster development or estate zoning. Full ownership rights of these sites could also be acquired through purchase, condemnation or donation. Even if such measures are implemented, it is recommended that a qualified archaeologist sufficiently clear con- struction areas of archaeological data prior to any grading for development. An archaeologist should also be present during all phases of grubbing and grading. If significant data are discovered during grading, the machinery should be diverted until adequate salvage is performed. 4. 3.5 Transportation/Circulation The areas of concern being considered in this General Plan Land Use Amendment lie adjacent to existing arterial streets or are directly connected to the arterial :street system by existing local streets . 46 i t ' i i � f f } Sections of some arterial and local streets adjacent to the properties included under this General Plat, Land Use i ! Amendment will need improvements. The improvements would occur as vehicular traffic increased or as properties are developed. Under the existing land uses included in this General Plan Amendment traffic volumes will generate 7,993 vehicular k trips per day along the City's arterial street system. f The proposed changes to the existing land uses will result in an increase of 2,499 vehicular trips per day, .increasing total vehicular trips generated by the new land use designa- tion to 10,492 per day. The change in land use will result ir, increased congestion, air pollutants and noise along the City's arterial street system. Figure 4-2 presents a 1 comparison of existing and proposed land uses by type in 1 terms of acreage and trips per day. The bulk of the increased traffic will occur on arterial streets lying adjacent to area of concern 2.3 (north of Talbert Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard) and Area of Concern 2.9 (west of Beach Boulevard and south of Talbert Avenue) . The proposed land use changes within these two Areas of orcern will increase traffic along Talbert Avenue, between Gothard and Beach Boulevard but will not be so great an increase to require upgrading Talbert Avenue above its present primary arterial road classifica- tion. FIGURE 4-2 Existing and Proposed Land Use Acreage and Vehicle Trips per Day Wstzng - Disking '-proposed' Pmpo ed Gross Roes Trips Gross Acres Cleneratrd Trips Low Density 16.48 11188 63.84 4,603 i Medium Density 0 0 62.32 5,889 Retail CunTercial 2.24 896 0 0 �+ General Industrial 107.44 5 909 0 0 TMMIS 126.16 7,993 126.16 10,492 47 4.3. 6 Air Resources Air quality within the City and the South Coast region will • experience an increase in pollutants above that otherwise experienced under the existing land use designations. This General Plan Land Use Amendment will generate approxi- mately . 26 tons per day more than would occur under the existing land use plan. The increase in air pollutants primarily results from the increased vehicular traffic movement. Figure 4-3 compares existing land use pollutants with the proposed land uses. FIGURE 4-3 POTENTIAL GENERATION OF AIR POLLUTANTS f Existing Land Uses Proposed Land Uses (Tcns/Day) (Tcns/Day) Pollutant Stationary Mobile Total Statiaria Mobile Total ..�. Carbon .01 1.36 1.37 .01 1.67 1.68 Monoxide Hydrocarbons .01 .13 .14 0 .15 .15 Nitrogen .07 .18 .25 .04 .20 .24 Oxides Particulate .01 .02 .03 .02 .03 .05 Sulfur Oxides .13 .01 .14 .06 .01 .07 TOTAL .23 1.70 1.93 .13 2.06 2.19 The estimated tonnage of pollutants may be reduced as newer model automobiles replace older models;- -Also, new advances in engine desfgn-and availability of cleaner fuels may, contribute to reduced air pollution. Area of concern 2-8 lies adjacent to the Southern Cali- fornia Edison generating plant. The area of concern may be affected by pollutants spewed from the generating plant's exhaust stacks. Such pollutants consist primarily of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter. The direr,_ effect upon the subject property will be similar to the other low density dwelling units within the area. The effect of the pollutants from the exhaust stacks on the subject property A however, be minimal, due 48 - - -- - - - i primarily to the close proximity of the exhaust stacks to i the property. The wind direction is primarily from the i southwest and has a ,:aspersing effect upon the pollutants. � � It is conceivable that properties located a greater i distance from the exhar.st stacks than the subject property would be impacted to an equal or greater extent due to 4 the wind currents. Development within area of concern 2 .7 (South of Warner Avenue and East of Solsa Chica Street) and 2.8 (South of Hamilton Avenue and West of Magnolia Street) may cause the dispersal into the atmosphere of strong odors. A portion of the area of concern 2.7 was once used for a solid waste dump site. It is believed that some amount of oil waste materials were deposited at the dump site. If development takes place on that portion of land that was once a dump site excavation and removal of existing fill would be + necessary. During such an operation strong odors may enter j the atmosphere. The odors would have resulted from chemi- cal reaction of the waste material buried at the dump site. Final Tract 9235 which lies in close approximation to the diunp site experienced the escape of strong odors into ! the atmosphere, during construction, that disturbed persons living in adjacent dwelling units. Soil samples should be taken prior to development to determine the extent of the land fill and the potential of escape of strong odors r, into the atmosphere. ' Development of area of concern 2.8, the Rotary Mud Dump Site, may produce odors in the atmosphere that are the result of dumping oil related waste materials over time and the chemical reaction resulting from the mixture of the waste materials. The developer of the subject property is proposing to treat the soil containing the waste mater- ial by mixing is with a lime base substance thus causing 1 the soil to solidify. Liquid materials that are not con- ducive to treatment will be removed from the site. During the treatment of the soil there may be dispersed into the r� atmosphere undesirable odors that may affect residents i living in existing dwelling units in the surrounding area. i 4. 3. 7 Noise i The noise impacts to be experienced in the various areas of concern are typical of the sound distrirbances exper- ienced in an urban environment. Generally the sounds from automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles cause the greatest disturbances to residential land uses (Noise Element Background Report, p. 98) . Land uses adjacent to the heavier travelled arterial streets will experience a greater amo:int of noise intrusion. The Noise Element Background Report presents noise contours for use on City's arterial street system and indicates specific areas of I 49 s i noise impact. (Noise Element Background Report, pages 64, 65. ) Figure 4-4 identifies those areas of concern that are recommended for change in land use designation and v- indicates the impacted areas and contour range for each. Also presented is the acceptability rating based on standards Established in the Noise Element (The General Plan, p. 40) . The Noise Element provides suggested methods for minimizing the noise impacts upon city land uses caused by vehicular traffic along the arterial streets and highways. Included in these suggestions are: . Local reduction of traffic noise through operation modifications (e.g. revise flow control methods, rerout- ing of traffic) . Outside to inside noise reduction for dwellings through modifications to improve sound insulation (e.g. minimize "soun3 leaks" around doors, windows and vents; replace "acoustically weak" components; structurally improve weak walls and roofs) . The maximum noise level for all residential uses is Ldn 60 for outdoors and Ldn 45 for indoors. Utilizing a maximum noise level of Ldn 60 does not mean that further resi- dential development in all areas exceeding the level of Ldn 60 should be prohibited. it simply means that acoustical analyses should be required in areas where the maximum standard is exceeded and that structural modifi- cations for new development (more insulation, no windows facing street, etc. ) would be necessary. Residential development in areas exceeding the level of Ldn 70 should be prohibited. The criteria level of Ldn 60 for residential uses is compatible with the California Noise Insulation Standards. FIGURE 4-4 r NOISE EXPOSURE ASSOCIATED WITH RECOMMENDED LAND USE CHANGES Area of Recommended Land Ldn Concern Use Changes Contour Interpretation 2. 1 Medium Density Residential 60 Acceptable 2. 2 Low Density Residential 60-65 Acceptable 2.3 Medium Density Residential 60 Acceptable 50 { FIGURE 4-4 Cont. A { 2.7 Medium Density Residential 60 Acceptable j 2.8 Low Density Residential 60 Acceptable 2. 9 Low Density Residential 60-65 Acceptable ' 4.3.8 Public Services 4.3.8.1 Police Service jso The Police Department operates from one police facility located in the south central section of the City near I Main Street and Mansion Avenue. The present level of f police manning is approximately 1 .14 officers per 1000 f persons. The proposed change in land use would result in �+ a net increased population of 3,342. Police levels would n have to be increased by four officers to provide adequate protection to the new residents. On-site security protection could minimize the increased demand on the Police Department. Future developments should conform to the California Attorney General's � n security provisions. 4.3.8.2 Fire Protection Of prime importance to the adequacy of fire protection coverage is response time, which is basically a function of the distance from the fire station to the incident location and the average speed of travel by fire apparatus. Fire stations should be located to provide an average response time of five minutes or less in 90 percent of the incidents. All study areas are located entirely within this response limit and can be adequately serviced. When il41, comparing development under the existing Land Use Element with General Plan Amendment 77-1, no difference in response time is expected. Manpower is a secondary factor in fire protection coverage because manning practices are normally based on the City' s financial capability rather than the fire hazard potential. As the areas of concern develop, k+ higher levels of manning will be necessary if the Fire Department is to maintain the level of service required. Based on current manning levels, an additional three fireman would be needed to serve the higher population. 4. 3. 8. 3 Schools The proposed land use changes in General Plan Amendment 77-1 will generate the following number of additional 51 r f i students within the local school districts: elementary 541, high school - 146, and junior college - 215. The elementary school districts have indicated that they can accommodate additional students generated by new housing developments within district boundaries. The Huntington Beach Union High School District has five schools which are already overloaded with a total capacity of 14,798 and a current enrollment of 18, 661. This student overload is being accommodated by temporary structures and extended-day schedules. Continued enrollment growth will intensify the need for extended school day schedules and force the continued implementation of other classroom alternatives. These effects will be partially mitigated by the new Ocean View High School at Gothard Street and r Warner Avenue, within the Huntington Beach Union High School District. The Coast Community College District indicates that their facilities can adequately accommodate the anticipated student increase from expected City growth. 4. 3. 8. 4 Recreation and Parks The Planning Staff has analyzed development under the proposed amendment for supply and demand of park lands, and found a need for 16.7 additional acres of park space. However, all concern areas except 2.7 are located in close proximity to community and regional park facilities. Access to such recreational areas minimizes the need for more neighborhood park space. The City should consider acquistion of the dump site at study area 2.7 to meet future park needs south of Warner Avenue and east of Solsa Chica Street. 4.3.8. 5 Hospitals Local hospitals will be required to serve an additional 3,342 people under General Plan Amendment 77-1 There are two hospitals in the City of Huntington Beach which serve the City' s population. An estimated 2, 500 people are served by Huntington Ynterc:ommuni.ty Hospital in some capacity every month. Pacifica Hospital served an estimated 350 people every month. Both hospitals are centrally located. Given the wide range of services offered at the two hospitals, there should be no problem providing health care to residents of Huntington Beach. In addition, the Amendment maintains ample land area for office professional uses to permit future medical develop- ment to accommodate the City' s ultimate population. 52 i A 4. 3. 9 Utilities 4. 3. 9.1 Energy Utilities The proposed amendment will increase the consumption of natural gas in the study areas by approximately 98. 9 million cubic feet per year. This can be attributed to an increase in land designated for residential uses. A Gas service is generally provided as a normal extension of existing facilities. However, the availability of natural gas service is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the juris- diction of the California Public Utilities Commission. Federal regulatory agencies can also affect gas supply. i Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided according to the revised con- ditions. , A The proposed amendment reduces the annual consumption of electricity by 9.9 million kilowatt hours, due Lo a decrease in industrial and commercial designated land that supports uses associated with high electri,--ity con- sumption. r� The Southern California Edison Company has indicated that electrical load requirements can be met through 1977 provided that electrical demand does not exceed estimates and there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply. The total demand is expected to continue to increase annually. If Edison 's plans to pro- ceeu with future construction of new generating facilities continue to be delayed, the ability to serve customer loads could become marginal by 1978. The following energy conservation measures are recommended M for new structures. j 1. Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. Z. Electric lights should be strategically placed ,-o maximize their efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. 3. Electrical heating in public and private structures 1 should be discouraged. Solar-assisted heating systems should be encouraged. r» } 4. Reflecting and/or insulating glass should be used in structures where N&S are not shaded by exterior 53 architectural projections or mature plants. 4.3.9. 2 Sewer and Water The proposed amendment will increase total sewage produc- tion by 400,000 gallons per day and water consumption by 500, 000 gallons per day above levels generated by uses under existing General Plan designations. Sewer and water service are ell, provided as a normal extension of existing facilities. The Orange County Sanitation District's master plan outlining ultimate land uses and flow coefficients For Huntington Beach approxi- mates the proposed intensity of land uses under the Land Use Element and proposed amendment. ,. The City's Public Works Department foresees no problems with City water production capabilities in providing local sewer and water service. Minor enlargements and extensions of existing lines would be required in new developments at the time of actual development. r The following water conservation measures are recommended for the community at large and individual structures where appropriate. 1. Reduce evaporation from reservoirs by encouraging underground storage or coating water surfaces with evaporation hindering films or substances. 2. Encourage tertiary treatment of and reuse of the return flow of public! water supplies wherever such use is acceptable and safe. '. Discourage development in areas where air conditioning may be used frequently and for long periods. 4. Land use planning should be sensitive to the under- ground water level and not produce greater demand on the underground water supply than is available. 5. Waterspreading where appropriate should be encouraged in order to recharge the underground water supply. 6. Metering of water can stimulate more economical rise and encourage repair of leaky connections. 7. Toilets and showers are commonly over designed and use more water than necessary. Consumption can be reduced by introducing appropriate modifications to toilets and showers. 54 ANIX impV ; �I �I I 4 4. 3. 9. 3 Solid Waste Disposal i The proposed amendment will increase overall solid waste generation by 1360 tons per year above that produced under existing General Plan designations. The Rainbow Disposal Company, who provides trash collection to the City of Huntington Beach, foresees no local service constraints. Orange County Refuse Disposal indicates that the refuse transfer station in Huntington Beach will operate indefinitely. The Coyote Canyon landfill site is projected to reach capacity during 1981, but several replacement sites will begin operation at that time in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management 0% Plan. The change in designations at concern areas 2.7 (south of Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica) and 2.8 (south of Hamilton Avenue and west of Magnolia Street) may hasten the treatment or removal of soild wastes deposited at the 04 respective dump sites, thereby removing significant nuisance factors from the community - Any solid waste materials requiring removal would be disposed at the County landfill. Oil related wastes not chemically treated would be removed to other Class III solid waste disposal sites in the County. ii 4.3.10 Human Habitat 4.3.10.1 Population Intensity The General Plan Land Use Element maintains a relatively �+ low development and population intensity throughout the City. The following residential density standards apply j to the areas of concern: 1. Low Density Residential: 0-7 units/gross acre , 04 2. Medium Density Residential: 7-15 units/gross acre At full development according to the proposed amendment, the study areas will contain approximately 1,267 dwelling units more than development under existing land use 0 designations. Of this total, 332 units will be single family anu 935 units will be multiple family. Development according to the proposed designations will increase the potential population by 3,342 above development under the existing Land Use Plan. Population intensity in low density areas will be approximately 24 persona per acre, «+ while that in medium density areas will Coal about 35 persona per acre. The following table sumnarixes the 55 ' changes by residential category: Existing Proposed DU Population DU Population Low Density Residential 115 397 447 1, 542 Medium Density Residential 0 0 935 21197 ry Total 115 397 1,382 31739 The impacts associated with these changes as well as ry mitigating measures necessary to deal with the impacts have been detailed throughout Sections 2.0 and 4.0. 4. 3.10.2 Aesthetics Rolling topography has some aesthetic value and can best ,7 be preserved by planned development concepts under the new residential designations. Concern areas involvinq a change from industrial to residential uses may subject some residents to unsightly industrial operations. Landscaped buffers and on--site !1 structural arrangement and design can minimize objection- able visual effects. 4.3.10. 3 Demolition/Relocation The change from industrial to residential uses at concern ! areas 2.3 and 2.9 and the increased residential density at study area 2.7 may raise land values. As a result some relocation of businesses and residents could occur as property taxes increased. A recreational vehicle storage facility and four older residences along Talbert, and fourteen older residences near Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chic a Street could be affected by such changes. i ' 4.3.11 EconomJ c Considaratiors This section of the Environmental Impact Report details the fiscal costs and benefits of General Plan Amendment fj 77-1. The economic analysis is based on a special study by Planning Department Staff entitled the 1976 Revenue Expenditure Analysis of Land Uses, August, 1976. The f` report deals only with short-range costs and revenues, and does not consider the long-range implications of the different development types. i- i 56 b.�f► I 1 The cost analysis of the amendment assesses fiscal costs and benefits as they relate to the City in terms of IA services provided and property tax and other revenues received. The analysis also examines the fiscal costs of educating the population and financing the local school system through district taxes. Total revenues and expenditures for development as I' 0% specified by existing uses and General Plan Amendment 77-1 are detailed in Figures 4-5 through 4-8. Land use, as proposed by the amendment, will result in an additional annual net surplus to the City of approximately $12,184. Land use according to General Plan Amendment 77-1 reduces the annual net surplus to the school districts by 104 $133,508. Although the net surplus to the school districts is lower under the proposed amendment, the redesignated uses are generally more compatible with surrounding land uses. Improved compatibility will mean a long-term increase in A the rate at which assessed values rise, thereby reducing the net surplus difference in future years. The amend- ment also balances the need for housing and open space with the apparent over-supply of commercial and industrial space in the City. � M 64 l_ 57 i r FIGURE 4-5 EXISTING LAND USE ELEMENT Summary of Annual Revenue and Expenditure Estimates as They Apply to the City of Huntington Beach Land Use Cate ory Revenue Expenditures I Residential Low $46, 523 $46, 474 Commercial General 17,593 9,099 Industrial General 182,111 167,499 TOTAL $246,227 $223,072 NET SURPLUS $ 23,155 FIGURE 4-6 EXISTING LAND USE ELEMENT Summary of Annual Revenue and Expenditure Estimates as They Apply to the School Districts Land Use Category Revenue Expenditures , Residential Low $117,239 $ 81095 Commercial General 13,832 Industrial General 428,901 TOTAL $559,972 $ 81,395 NET SURPLUS $478,577* *School Districts do not actually receive a surplus rather the local share of the cost of educating students is increased. 58 ril�r•�YYY Y YYYII yY�Y�YYY�i � R FIGURE 4--7 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 A Stuamary of Annual Revenue and Expenditure Estimates as They Apply to the City of Huntington Beach +'+ Land Use Category Revenue Eenditure Residential L•ow $180,220 $180,029 Medium 209,208 174,060 �"► TOTAL $389,428 $354,089 NET SURPLUS $ 35, 339 FIGURE 4-8 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 Summary of Annual Revenue and Expenditures Estimates as They Apply to the School Districts Land Use Category Revenue Expenditure +► Residential Low $454, 158 - $315,306 Medium 492,577 286,360 TOTAL $946,735 $601,666 NET SURPLUS $345,069* *School Districts do not actually receive a surplus rather the local share of the cost of educating students is increased. i i 59 lip 4.4 Alternatives to the Proposed Action 4.4. 1 No Project The first alternative is that of taking no action, The implications of such a decision would be to continue the policies and land use designations set forth by the General Plan Land Use Element. The areas of concern now designated industrial would continue vacant in the long-term in wafting for quality industrial development, or develop to marginal industrial uses in the short-term. The Industrial Land Use Study, Part II indicates the cause as a persistent over-supply of industrial land in the City's Central Industrial. Corridor and Edison Area. In the meantime, the need and demand for a variety of housing in the City will continue to be acute. The no project alternative thus reinforces the inbalance between industrial over-supply and housing needs in the future. The perpetuation of industrial over-supply also means that the City will forego significant revenues because of long- term vacancy or the attraction of marginal industrial uses. Pursuing the no project alternative would further resu'.t in a less comprehensive, more disjointed approach to growth that would provide neither proper development guidelines nor adequate environmental regulations. The no project alternative would eliminate some of the adverse effects associated with the amendment proposals. There would be a lesser impact on utilities, public services, traffic, air quality, and noise. Demolition of structures or relocation of residents and businesses would be reduced. There would be fewer or no permanent residents impacted at concern areas of serious flood and seismic hazard potential, i.e. , areas 2.7 and 2.8. However, the nuisances produced by the disposal of waste materials at these sites would continue unabated, and to adversely affect surrounding residential areas. 4. 4 .2 Land Uses Other Than Existing and Proposed Designations Individual project alternatives for each of the study ireas are discussed and analyzed in Section 2.0 of this port. The alternatives considered are generally not L.. ' rely consistent with the goals and policies of the Cit, �f Huntington Beach as stated in the General Plan. ► i The a,. ndment as prepared is in conformance with these goals an, policies and will result in a balance of the j important •ironmental values and an optimum environment in terms oi physical, economic, social, and psycho logical facto. 1 60 I 4.a Short-Term and Long-`hers-, Productivity Being a long-term guide for future development, General plan Arrend-- ment 77-1 establishes a positive relaL -unship between the local short- term uses of man' s environment and the iintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity. The amendment identifies short--range issues within a context: of long-range goa.li, policies, and environ- mental planning programs. General Plan Ame.,.dment 77-1 iE in itself a miuigat.i.on measure designed to minimize any adverse eff-ets on long-term productivity resulting from short-term uses. Concerning underdeveloped and vacant industrial lands, the ong-term effect will be a balancing of the City's residential and c a space ,q needs with an industrial land supply that is more in line 4 h the City's capability to attract viable business activities. one of the steps required to implement the amendment is An a lysis of the zone changes necessary to bring the zoning into cGnfo. :lice with the General Plan. The zoning changes that would resu-14- iuld have significant short-term effects, such as creating non-u rming uses, reducing or increasing intensity of development permit , and providing stimulus for development. The long--term effects wu . i be land uses that are reflective of the plan' s provisions. 4.6 Irreversible Environmental Changes The Amendment will mitigate most adverse effects. However. , irreversi- ble environmental changes of a secondary nature can be expected from development under the proposed amendment. Loss of open space as vacant land is converted to other uses will be a change. Although the option to recycle the land to open 60acP after development is available, it is probably not economically feasible. Alteration of topography will be an irreversible change. Although mitigating measures can be imposed as part of the development ,y process, the natural topograph, will experience some degree of change. Construction materials of mineral origin will be needed for d(,velop- me!it to occur, and fossil fuels will be committed for long periods to satisfy local energy demand. w 4. 7 Growth Inducing Impact Land uses under General Plan Amendment 77-1 Will provide the stimulus to encourage residential development in most of the vacant areas surrounding -he study sites. In the case of study area 2.7, residential devela, lent of the surrounding properties would be in conformance with General Plaii Land Use Element. Thera would 6, w to i r also be increased residential pressures in the Central Industrial Corridor and Edison Industrial Area. However, i:iary of these sites were found to be marginally attractive to quality industrial ,. development by the Industrial Land Use Study, Part II. The further change in industrial designations to residential ones would be con- sistent with the study's findings. The proposed amendment will also have growth inducing effects within the areas of concern. An additional population of 3, 342 persons �. would be generated by uses under General Plan AmenCment 77-3., thereby creating an increased demand on public services and utilities and incrementally affecting air quality, water quality, traffic, and i noise levels. However, the proposed uses in accord with c-neral. Plan policies and programs will mitigate many of the adverLj effects generated by the expected growth, and will help to insure that the future growth is well-planned and serves to increase the viability of the City's economic base. i r f' G i C. 62 AMIX C t A FOOTNOTES A 1. Land Use Element: Phase I, Huntington Beach Planning Department, Dncem er, 9 3, pp 6.8, 6. 9. 2. Seismic-Safety Element, Huntington Beach Planning Department, A August, M4, pp 103-105. 3. Conservation Potentials _Report, Huntington Beach Planning Department, march, 974, pp-l-!R'--.47; 133-141. 4 . open Space Potentials, Huntington Beach Planning Department, February, , pp 2l; 77-91; 93-110. 5. Geotechnical Inputs, Huntington Beach Planning Department, FeEruary, . 6. Flood Hazard Study, Huntington Beach Planning Department, Aprr. , 1174. 7. Land Use Element: Phase I, p 6.9. 8. Seismic-Safety Element, pp 105-106. 9. Conservation Potentials Report, pp 47-92; 133--141. 10. !Zeen Space Potentials, pp 17-25; 68-71; 93-110. 11. Flood Hazard Study. w 12. Fire Hazard/Fire Protection Study, Huntington Beach Firo and P ann ng Departments, Ju y, r974, pp 21-24. 13. Land Use Element: Phase I. pp 6. 9, 6.10. 14. Seismic-safety Element, pp 106-107. . e1 15. Conservation Potentials Report, pp 92-104 . 16. Land Use Element: Phase I, p. 6.10. 17. Seismic-Safety Element, p. 107. 18. Conservation Potentials, pp 104-124. 19. Seismic-Safety Element, pp. 108, 109. 20. Conservation Potentials Report, pp. 124-133. a) 21. OV.n Space Potentials, pp. 39-45. 63 N s i I 1 22. Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory, Archaeological r Research, Incorporated, January, 1975. 23. General Plan Amendment 77-- „. (proposed) , Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, 1976. n 24. Lend Use Element: Phase I, pp. 2.12 - 2.13, 2.15 - 2.16. 25. Circulation Element Background Report, Huntington Beach P ann ng Department, August, 1976, pp 10-15, 42-46, 51-57, and 65-67 . r 26. The General Plan, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, Section 3.1. 27. Population Growth Element Background Report, Huntington Beach Planning D`epar mont., August, . r 28. pp pen Space and Conservation Element Background Report, .,ce 29. Conservation Potentials, pp. 125-128. 30. OEan Space Potentials, pp. 50-58. r 31. Southern California Gas Company, 1974. 32. Southern California Edison Company, 1974. 33. Department of Public Works, City of Huntington Beach, July, 34. Rainbow Disposal Company, July, 1976. 35. De artment of Public Works, City of Huntington Beach, July, 1976. 36. Population Growth Element Back round Report, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, 1976. 37. Noise Element Background Report, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, 1976. 38. Noise Element Background Report, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, 1976, pp-. Iv. 39. Musing Element Background Report, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August, , section 3.2.3.. 64 A A A A A ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 77-3 ON A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 (Includes distribution list, comments on the r draft EIR, responses to the comunerts, and initial studies'.) 0 65 t DISTRIBUTION LIST r GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 EIR 77-3 n CITY DEPARTMENTS STATE DEPARTMENTS Department of Public Works Air Resources Board Harbors and Beaches Public Utilities Commission City Attorney Regional Water Quality Department of Building and Control Board r Community Development Regional Coastal Commission Fire, Department Police Department SCHOOL DISTRICTS Recreation and Parks Department Library Ocean View Elementary School City Clerk District C ' City Council Huntington Beach Elementary Planning Commission School District Environmental Council Huntington Beach Union Nigh School District COUNTY DEPARTMENTS Coast Community College District r` Orange County Water Department Orange County Transit District INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Orange County Sanitation District Environmental Management Agency SLAG i 66 i i l JJ DO CITY OF HUNTINGTON1 D' EACr14 .tJ INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION J ..r KM. MG111N fF (H dk To John M. Cope From Mike Zambory Associate Planner Citf Engineer Subject General Plan Amendment 77-1 Date April 26, 1977 • As requested in your memo of April 21, 1977 we have reviewed the General Plan Amendment 77-1, Miscellaneous Items, dated March 19, 1977.• , We have comments to offQr on three of the nine land use changes recommended in the amendment as follows: ~ 1. Area of 6 ccrn 2.2 This land is located immediately sough of ana adjacent to t e existing street department Corporation Yard. At the present time street sweepers leave the Yard area at 4:00 A.M. and intentionally drive south on Gotthard in order not to disturb the trailer park residents to the north of the Yard. By +� altering the land use of the property on the south of the Yard from light: industrial to low density residential, we can anticipate . complaints from the residents due to the noise emanating directly • from the Yard as well as from Yard vehicles traversing Gotthard Street in the wee hours of the morning. 0% 2. Area of Concern 2.7 The southerly half of this area once contained a totally uncon:=I.-Aled dump site. Anything and everything was accepted for deriving. We might anticipate odor problems when this area is excavated comparable to that experienced on Mr. Buccella's development .immediately east of this site. 3. Area of Concern 2.8 For a number of years this land has been used as a ump site or drilling mud. At the present time all sorts of rip rap including blocks of Portland cement concrete, old asphalt, and large diameher reinforcing steel bars are being dumped adjacent to and into the drilling-mud ponds. It is difficult to imagine how this land will physically support low density residential development. am ry • City Engineer Mz:jy N 'I i 'I 1 67 i r . nJ HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT r 1. Response to Comment #1 (Area of Concern 2.2) : No response necessary. 2. Response to Comment #2 (Area► of _Concern 2.7) : r No response necessary. Potential odors at concern areas 2.7 and 2.8 are noted in Section 4. 3.6 (Air Resources) on page 51. 3. Response to comment #3 (Area of Concern 2. 8) : It is also difficult to imagine how this land will ever support r viable industry. Poor freeway access and the high cost of mitigating soil, odor, and drainage problems will discourage quality Industrial developers indefinitely. Possibly non- structural storage or low intensity warehouses could find advantage here, but the soil problems would still have to be addressed, and the revenue benefits to the City would be minimal. The same would apply to uses other than industrial and residential as well. i I I . r © PLANNING DEPTH U IV'1 y a w MAY 17 1977 o , P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY TELEPHONE: 6311.1643 ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION AREA CODE 714 III NORTH &ROADWAY MSILIN •oo•[��r SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA P.O. sox a1:: A SANTA ANA, CALIPORNIA 92702 May 13, 1977 H. o.OIRECTOCTORNER TILE 280-752 RICHARD G.MUHSELL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ADVANCE PLANNING John M. Cope Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach eq P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Subject: General Plan Amendment 77••l Dear Mr. Cope: A This is in response to your form letter dated April 21, 1977 that transmitted the document entitled "General Plan Amendment 77-1), Miscellaneous Items, March, 1977" and solicited Written comments no later than May 19, 1977. The document has been reviewed and We have the following comment to offer re- garding possible constraints to the development of some of the land use areas discussed: 1. The current policy for residential development prohibits direct residential frontage and access onto arterial highways; therefore, an internal circulation system should be established for each �•t affected parcel. Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing and responding to your Draft EIR. ` Very truly yours, 1 � f . ich r G. Mun ell, Assistant Director Adv ce Planning JEB:bim ' cc: FM-Advance Planning (Drennan) EKA-Development (Gilbert, Schwarze) I 69 J r ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY r 1. Response to Comment #1: No response necessary. r r i i 4. I 70 Ash. Z ► r GBNE-ML PLAN AMENDMENT 77-1 I NTROD(ICT IO1J. Important to maintain a^onservatinn balance of land uses in Community. ' Fucl Freeway access not neceRsar 1 keltabiIit.1tlnn of Downtown Y in balanced community. Industry into uth,r Arras will result in movement inrlu� lrtal ,rr of canr�runtty. of light Concern for lass of • industrial property to maintain. E Piecemeal a steely al approach to plannina is unsound . Aron should be exten. planned to take total community into consideratiol, • In my op{nipn the General Plan I Huntington Uhach when considered Aln,ndmendmrnt is not ` anted communityrr iR as tr whole in the ht:et Interests it where Ruing In he of more imPcrtnnce,� rming Yearn ra "bul• y Cite number of johr: nfferecl in tilt! {, his t number of residents shnuid ht� a )rime. � r''"1ediutr. Ype of commun- crisis being3 i,r)a1 fnr' our citv.) a equalS Lila ment near teiral omes's; 1 ) future Years penp{e arc, WiLh the rnergy +� to drive ,rent clistances to wnrk.goin t' F,oing to need employ. be encouraged i t iba,aRc�1 co e to L,,y ;!;Ill afford g in lEunr.in This fuel future dcman�!s. Fton Death by retainin mmunity concept should !. our industrial lands for Also when you look at the 144Y acces, which its of ten Industrial rreasnIn his light Is minimist.d. TAc, , the lack of •free- c mpinyt•t�s :Cori much ul t hr mrrrkr�t lwi will ng Industrial use Ono avect or drwc�Inlnnrv�i c,f t Ile this report. i'hr' ctt tntlu,:trial land hrla area and sum, t , Y kt:et).; 1)trxhinb for rvdave not hren cited in men wi 11 he Yp of redevr. lnlntu'nt IK inevlt,rbli,E)ment in the downtown This is looking luward the industrial 111rndrerlta of Truainesa.. a fact (:videncr!d 1) , areas p( ()Ur city FI Lht:st! ar,•ng �Ireacl Y the it ownership n( much of thr.y to relocate. , this L'imr: Y' Hr,wuw•r, n,:nt proprrty in dtrc to lack of Y ccrnn"t Fc'll their or Plan has Leen ;)dnptc•d ancli•3rtificiI t Interest, s dc'wntnwn lnnd at inr;ustrinl ince no fire ret)cVelo t.�ntl will r•ventuall �y inflated land vnluc�R. llowevertthe the LYptr c'f sm:111 busing:, y n` ' dr d lty Chc�sc bustnt.s:;as. stand s51. who art: Lent:ricis1 to These are A the backbonecfceia'ed jobs and products tilt, city uti 1 i7ec1 b Y from a revenue buxin^5Se4 thaC tin y community. Thagc types of l,usf ics,c5y and that forma y Thuy nvet) not ne'•d frt•ou,av access I,ut are art ttaIit thy: 1nr{,�ytri.t I invaluable lrnrl to i)e there. to the city, AS a 1nr16 tr2rrn ping, thr� sensible rrnrtct I,rrarrv,)tlr,n of tl,r. lnrlu:rCrinl lanrl le t}rr± n 1 tr, cr,nslder. M i Pt'rsollally dt, nnC 1,t. n Lind but lE°vt' in brt�nkTn); tip bits ,rnrl r fnl ir,winy; ;,rt: m Pieter: of Y cnnrnt•nt�; „rr t•idu;tl � industrial 2.1 Generally acceptable for i tt.cvH: access fc,r industrial change to residential noise, pressure .... Environmentallydue to lack of i from residents to unsound - lights, Rat land for light industry. 71 1 ' r 2.2 NO vip chnraeter of this land th defirtitely induntrini. The fence arurtnd the city yard ig iloLi.vd chain link. T'he rquipmynt and indus- trial urea are readily vinthl,► and audibly. The General Telephone facility it, lit up by many many high intemi:y lights at night and is _t readily identifiatble as an industrial site.. :,!ao their many vehicles r ►1 are visible through the fence anti rhrring Lire clay :rente a great deal of industrial traffic. This residential area is right in the middle ref prime industrial and Lol al ly rtnacceptnhlr•. 5 acres ir3 a very adequate amount of land fur• many quality lutsinysses. it 2.3 Residential use not compatible with current industrial uses in area. r This residential development would create many more people needing jobs but the city would be eliminating the job market by eliminating the industrial cn.ridnr. Taihyrt could provide ncces route to liigliway I 39 and Late freeway and sites are ideal siy.y for industrial. i' 2.4 Agree with City - recommend this area he retained for industrial use. C 2.5 Agree with City rocnmmendaLinns , 2.6 Acceptable for commercial. Recommend trees and shrubs as buffer be- tween freeway and residenceR to mitigate noise. 2.6.3 Air prrllution in locations with proximity t.) Freeway. Commercial be-, ,l causC of surrounding uses. C 2.7 No. Tau many prohlemo :rith aircraft noise, open space requirements, etc. Retain Industrial. 2.7.1 Noise prMuLlon. 2.8 Due to previous user; this property needs further extensive soil and r- geological studies to determine feasible land use. City should demand that developer fully .filter soil conditions. Elud dump is Gp feet deep. Pollution from Steam Plant. May be inappropriate for either residen- t Lial and tralustriat. 111gli Rig!{ S�►�rtIc Area. _ 2.9 No. This is a vital part of t1io industrial corridor. Talbertix al- ready supporting quality industrial use. Retail industrial consist- ing with surrounding arna. Z1Aj OA C*3 a &I . oN N tG MANOI G • I-1 �-sR Q � K�7T��t'P TO N. u 72 t 1 A HUNTYNGTON BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL 1. Response to Environmental Council. Comments: The Planning Department's analysis of the study areas appears in the amendment and draft environmental impact section of this report. The staff's recommendation to reduce industrial acreage rests on the findings of the Industrial Land Use Study, Parts I and II and the 1976 Revenue/Expenditure Analysis of Land Uses. N AN I w M 73 I r WT ix�, '; r GRANGE COUNTY TRANBPr DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACt l PLANNING DEPT. JUN 3 1y� � n i I P. Q. Box 190 Hay 31, 1977 Nunungton BeVh.CA 92648 { � r Mr. John M. Cope City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r { i Dear Mr. Cope: Thank you for submitting a copy of the draft environmental impact report, for the proposed Huntington Beach General Plan Aawadment 77.1 to us, for our review. Our only cnmpnt, at this time, is that there is no mention of { transit service and accessibility to buses in the analysis of transportation and circulation. The items considered iu this a2tudsleut will increase the residential density and the traffic flow on arterials adjacent to the study areas, and the impacts on transit service should be considered. i f Sincerely, -00 • C Robert C. Hartwig Manager of Planning RCH:L i I { r { I I C ^ I-200 NORTH MAIN STREET P.O.BOX nsa SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 02702 PHONE(714)s3"llui { 74 t l ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT 1. Rtzsponse to Orange County Transit District Comments: The proposed project would add approximately 2,600 people to the Orange County Transit District service area in Huntington Beach. As a general rule, the district considers areal within one-quarter mile of a bus route to be adequately serviced. All concern areas except 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 meet this require- ment. About 1,700 people in the three study areas would be located beyond one-quarter mile but within one-half mile of a bus route. To mitigate potential inadequate service, the City should continue to work with the Orange county Transit District in rupport of expanding the long haul fixed bus route service into Huntington Beach. N M M t ISO � i M 75 f 1 � LAND UStp:" ELEMENT AMENDMENT 80 = 1 Adopted April 1980 s nvirohrr entol Impact Report 79--5 h untie ton be c� � � department of development services t r•.rt• r. F' jx RESOLUTION NO. 4865 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINUTON BEACH ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 80-1 `1'O THE CITY'S OENEHAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with with changing community needs and objectives; and A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment iNo. 80•-1 to the a eneral Plan was held by the Planning Commission on March 18, 1980 and approved for recommendation to the City Council; and , Thereafter, the City Council , after giving notice as pre-: scribed by Goverrunent Code Section 65355 , held at least one public hearing to consider said Land Use Element Amendment No. 80--1; and At .gala hearing before the City Council till persons desiring to be heard on said amendment were heard, . NOW, THEREFURE, BE IT RE.SOLy::D by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7, j Chapter 3, Article 6 of Cali,"ornia Government Code, commencing with Section 65357 , that Land Use Element Amendment No. 80-1 to the General Plan, consisting of the following changes is hereby adofted: 11 .81 acres located south of Talbert Avenue and approximately 430 feet west of Beach Boulevard, as indicated in Figure 2-. be redesignated from low density residential to medium density residential . Phat 50.37 acres located north of Talbert Avenue and east e--r Beach Boulevard , as indicated in Figure 2--8 , be redesig- nated from open space to public , quasi public, Institutional. 3• That the Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix, as dupic ted in Figure 4-1 of the General Plan, be changed to I j !ahb 3/"_1 80 1 , r show an S P-1 district consistent with public, quasi public , insti- tutional rather than open space. A 4. That Section 3 .4.2.3, "Natural Resources ," page 75 of the Land Use Element, be revised to incorp.)rate the following policies: (a) Promote design in development that will accommodate energy conservation features ; and (b) Promote a pattern or development within the city which would facilitate the establishment or mass transit systems. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Clty Council of the City or Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7t % day of Mrril , 1980. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: 14tn0_0 - a C1t Admin strator Director of Development Services 2. 5'i'Am OF CALIFORNIA ) conTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNtINGTON BEACH ) 1, ALICIA H. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, ani ex-aEficio r' srk of the City council of said City, do hereby certify that tale whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular a}eting thereof held on the _ 7th day of _April --__, 19 60, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Pattinson, Mandic, MacAllistor, Bailey, Yoder, Finley NOES: Councilmen: Thomas ABSENT; Councilmen: City Clerk and ex-••.fficio Clerk of the City Council of the City r� Huntington Beach, California 1 •.v RESOLUTION N0. 1261 r� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 80-1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of WHER , g y Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan n keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and WHEREAS;, amendments to the Land Use Element are nec- essary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning staff recommends the following amendments to the Land Use Element: 1. That 11 .81 acres located south of Talbert Avenue and appronimately 430 feet west of Beach Boulevard, as indicated in Figure 2--7, be redesignated f.ro.0 low density residential to medium density residential; 2. That 50.37 acres located north of Talbert Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard, as indicated in Figure 2-8 , be redesignated from open space to public, quasi- public, institutional; 3 . That the Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix as depicted its Figure 4-1 of the General Plan document be changed to show the SP-1 zoning district consistent with public, quasi-public, institutional rather than open space; 4 . That Section 3.4 .2. 3, Natural Resources, Page 75 of. the Land Use Element be revised to incorporate the following policies: rl . Promote design i n dovviopim-W 1 h,i1. wi .H ot;voillim)- date energy conservation features; l b. Promote a pattern of development within the Ci. y which would facilitate the establishment ( of mass transit systems; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element ^+ Amendment to the General Plan No. 80-1 was hold by the City Planning Commission on Marchl8, 1980 in accordance with provisions of the State Government Code; 3 j Resolution No. March 4 , 1980 Page 2 r� NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning t Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, hereby adopts r said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adop- tion by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 18th day of March, 1980 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winrhell . Kenefick, Porter, Bazil, Bauer NOES: None ABSENT: Greer, Shea ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: jp -a4 �) >3 - (r 674aeZis W. Pal in, Secretary Robert D. Bazil, Chairman PIN", as as.-.'..,,,•_:.•. ....:. . .:... ... ........ ,...... . • _ .. .... ._._. ...............V.�_.. .........<....a.-•.Lal•lh YtV.Jt'Ta LR^..Zi..+lwwrti� TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Methodology 1 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 3 2.1 Garfield - Goldenwast Area 3 2.2 Beach - Talbert Area A 24 2.3 Beach - Talbert Area B 32 2.4 Environmental Changes 37 3.0 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 41 4=0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY 43 4.1 Summary of Proposed Land Use Element 43 Amendment 60.1 APPENDICES f 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' This report concerns Amendment 80-1 to the Land Use Element of the I-Im ington Teach General Plan. The Land Use Element was adopted as a mandated element of the General Plan in December, 1973; this is the fourteenth amendment to the Element. Planned land uses throughout the City are depicted of the Land Use Diagram shown in Figure I_1. 1 1•I Methodology it i This amendment to the Land Use Element considers req uests by private ! property owners to change the land use designations in two areas of the City: A site located south of Garfield Avenue and east of Goldenwest Street, and orie located south of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard. The Department of Development Services also requests to change the land lose designation of an area located north of Talbert Avenue and east of Beech Boulevard. The amendment requests will be analyzed in terms of the existing conditions on the sites, anticipated impact on surrounding areas; land use, environmental, and other Issues; and consistency with adopted City goals and policies. Also included in this amendment Is a request by the Planning Division to add energy conservation policies to the Land Use Element (Section 3.0). Section 4.0 summarizes the recommended changes in the form of a comprehensive text and plan to be adopted. Section 15148 of the State EIR Guidelines states that "The requirements for an EIR on a local general plan element or amendment thereof will be satisfied by the general plan or element document and no separate EIR will be required If: 1 i I) the general plan addresses all the points required to be in an EIR by Article 9 of the State EIR Guidelines, and 2) the document contains a special section or a cover sheet identifying where the general plan document addresses each of the points required." In conformance with State guidelines, this document will constitute the EIR for land Use Element Amendment 80-1. The environmental setting and significant impacts associated with the issue areas Identified in the initial study are addressed under each area of concern (Sections 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3). Alternative land use designations and feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant effects are also discussed in these sections. Section 2.4 addresses overall environmental changes as related to the following considerations: 1) the relationship between local short-term uses of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; 2) irreversible or unavoidable environmental changes; and 3) growth inducing ! impacts. I i I' 2 ► 1) the general plan addresses all the points required to be in an EIR by Article 9 of the State EIR Guidelines, and2fhehgenP�a�np�an document ains a ddressesecial �each or a cover sheet identifying where of the points required:' In conformance with State guidelines, this document will constitute the EIR for cant impacts associatedsoda ed wement ith tli ment �ve areas environmental setting and significant P _h area of concern Identified in the initial study to nativereland use edesignations and feasible • (Sections 2.1, 2.2 and ) mitigation measures to minimize significant effects nre also discussed in these N sections. Section 2.4 addresses overall between mental local cis shortated-term to mt uses l of mans 1 considerations: i) the relationship onship p environment and the maintena envir enhancement long-term e ntalchanges; and productivity', i growth inducing 2) irreversible or unavoidableonme Impacts. ( 2 i I, i ATEPLA NE Ga n ULMM "•6-76 187 �M 4 Land UsEf Cotego�3es s-7.77 q46 a-I-77 4"If RES+1bE1�TIAL t=f•77 Rrft t!-7 T7 493t t2-S-77 am a-m-Ta 45T2 � 1 Es�6 Z 2 un/Q= a•t-74 au "-&?t; 4696 u-2r?a =z" °a-lto-Ta +u7" � �Es10t8 5 4 Unfpac l.Cw Det*y 5 7 unVpOC COMMERCIAL ®Genera! Office Prolesskxw s:.:....;..i:?i......ii{=(:i s .:i:ri»'}: .t WDUSTRIAL ?!�!�;s{:�,iii::{i?is::«":�a •'ri:•�:a:: its{.. . . .. •..t.;::••;: iu �s• r{ i»:iT ?:• \ G@n�rOl iFii"?iis.sjiu i{I tii}�:}{{Elii{is.. •:{= i:�:isi}}ii,rias}!F:'i:`ii:':i il}:}�ri;.s:pit°s.i..�r}ssi,ssi}I..{j•.{i,..•i.«iEasr::.u?s�.Jrr:sia{}i'i:t i:ili:s:ii:si;a�•i:si.{{}.s•{{ssst:i jsrij Ei,�;i.•i:?:{.i:i:::�!r}ss}.?fi t iirii:s�{{irai!•s'{'. . PUBLIC USEtw tnifftil. .i ? Pntc,Quosi-p ub6cInstitutio- ;I ii ^: u iis}i Open Spoce •:t•�si• !F.iiiiiii{i;.s•• .{s.t:••F.{F.• lii:s•?is�' �;s;:,::„': i::ii::�:}ii}'{#iis•s.u:.ili{.::�i.}.ystis.::u ...::•: :}Fili:{`'t:iii{=:!ii:i}!iliiC:,'•{i}{iir Eir : i? 's ?i. ICJ y�.�@ '•:?=ir,n •s�isii^}:;;ip i{ �• '0:p 'i::{zr:«F°«se:. �.�.w,.y Sean ii•;ii Hai:. :::� •� :: •.� OTHER USES Resource Production it AN �..j2 � S/r^lya \.�/�'!.�.•i•�Y f\',p.�.�r•� rl:l - � "C•j'!•' ��� ..w .,rye *=:�.�,;.�� .� �ti�-r•f�•.:.�•...` __ —�s=s .t• :.:� � � I R �tVC GEWRAL FLAN LAND USE.; DIAGRAM Adopted rembwiW ,I �I li 'fl � I I I • ( I 2.0 AREA OF CONCERN � I This section addresses each request area designated in Figure 2-1. 2.1 Garfield•• Goldenwest Area In June, 1977, the Department of Development Services received an application for a General Plan amendment from several property owners within a 97 acre area located south of Garfield Avenue and east of Goidenwest Street. The group of nitre owners requested a land use redesignation from medium density residential to industrial. The Planning Commission considered the amendment request on July 17, 1979. Staff recommended that the item be postponed until completion of the Fiscal Impact Model wd the Housi•,�; Element. The Commission directed staff to further analyze the request and return with land use alternatives for additional review at the July 24, 1979 study session. At "his mmeeting, the Planning Commission discussed a range of land use alternatives, including industrial, residential and a mix of the two. The Commission decided to continue the request to the next General Plan Amendment. 2.1.1 Background The area of concern encomposes approximately 97.4 acres bounded by Garfield Avenue on the north, Huntington Street an the east, Clay Avenue on the south and Goidenwest Street on the west. 'rt,; a north-south streets (Stewart, Crystal, and Holly) and the Pacific Electric right-of-way divide the study area into five 19.5 acre blacks. Main Street traverses the two blocks between Crystal Street and the railroad right-of-wfty. Existing land uses within the area are shown in Figure 2-2. While oil extraction activity and related services are dominant, the area also supports a diver.", mixture of I equestrian, commercial and roside,rtiol uses. 3 i i Ii i s I i S Q f 2.2 .�. ING 23 I Jv.ri N / I1 •'�� v WN I �� � .r. / • MN� i I r I l Figure 2-1 i Areas Of concern huntington beach planning division d I - I 'J L$gRFlfrltl—Cs01DEl�l`J11EST AREA GARFIELO —VTM AVE.-IJ � ]TflT oil N M v:§':.:.r:.�..' tire, 1► — — Fwt • — N _ Ar Jr IAL y O X DER ` a/ ti C STRUMON rZAlp i s` Ar Lp m C Ar N 0 ►. r J' X X _ Ar Ar CLAY J "" OIL WELL m COMMERCIAL at OFFICE AVE. INDUSTRIAL a HORSE STABLE sr RECREATION RVaUSTRIJC!-Ot►RELATED, APARTMENTS Q PUBLIC USR Rwrn 2-2 i i i + i i h �71 R Oil wells connected to localized tanks cover much of the area; there are 50 active wells and 89 oil storage tanks occupying 30 acres. Oil production is concentrated primarily on the three blocks west of Holly Street. A number of industrial businesses are located throughout the Garfield-Goldenwest area, occupying approximately 15 acres. The businesses are typically located along Stewart and Crystal Streets and include small oil field equipment supply outlets and maintenance and storage services. Other uses include a recreation vehicle storage facility, a welding shop, and several auto repair shops. Tlk: most substantial industry in the area is the Cambro plant which covers almost six acres at Huntington Street and Clay Avenue, and employs 250 persons. A City water reservoir and warehouse, a quasi-industrial use, occupies eight acres of the northerly end of this block. Commercial uses ore relatively insignificant in the area (occupying about three acres of land), and consist of a real estate office, restaurant, and several equestrian stables. Two high de.-isity apartment developments with a total of 62 units are located at Holly Street and Garfield Avenue. Although these uses cover only three ricres, a 1S3 unit condominium project on 11 acres is now under construction east of Holly Street and south of Main. Excluding this large parcel, most of the remaining vacant land (28 acres) is dispersed In small frogments throughout the amendment area. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the entire Garfield-Goldenwest area as medium density residential. The study area is essentially transitional between designated industriallresource production uses to the north and west, and commercial/residential uses to the south and east. ExiMing General Plan land use designations for the site and the surrounding area are depicted in Figure 2-3. Zoning within the area of concern is shown in Figure 2-4 and summarized below: ZONING DISTRICT ACRES R2 Two Family Residential District 44.6 RA-0 Residential Agricultural Distr;--t 32.1 combined with oil production RA-0-CD Residential Agricultural District 10.1 , combined with oil production and civic district MI Light Industrial District 9.7 Cl Neighborhood Commercial District .9 The `aregoing indicates that a significant portion of the property has not yet been brought into consistency with the medium density residential General Plan designation. The transitional and mixed ease nature of the study area makes the establishment of a uniform land use category difficult. 6 ju oc o°� ��a ac '■'NN■■s•■fwN S..up£.£tmt. �.=££ .2. ss gi:fi}£s a a {�" Q��,{c� c ■■■fas f•■f■w2� ::£s3i££i£?s•a=: :ti�j£.£tH.: r l Q rT 7 CTr • • • N ■ • 22£.'.��.•Siit £trf' -�, :• °o N ■ • r ■•■w w u r•N w■w•r w r waa : •• : .•� ■ • •i i� •�isi Y i • N ■ w • N ■ ■ f • ■ N N • i ■•/' •'ij]•��••��•i�/•!,.�'� ..�"�.:••i... "I•�Nf • ■ ■ ■ N ■ r ■ / • ■ f ■ w f N j�• X.O. a i 1 ■ • ■ .■ ••■ ■ MOOS ■ • N w M (�•�••/•�•:i'r:•��' i 3 S zz w I i2 CLAY: O . .................. ................. ! }}} !!} i{ � •••.•...•••••.. \��\/ 1'i /2/+1 1���1 lit !! �? {l i ::.•: • ...• `�: i f�•� /l /�/i/\ / 2 .i•ltiii S i2M!1 �•�I£•I t RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC USE ESTATE 5 Z un/9rc RM GENERAL PUBLIC.QUASI-PUBLIC.IIISTITUCII1l ESTATE - 4un/gac OFFICE PROFESSIONAL OPEN SPACE '•••• LOW DENSITYt'7un/ac INDUSTRIAL OTHER USES MEDIUM DENSITY ■ ' GENERAL RESOURCE PRODUCTION Figure 7-3 � '.. . GENERAL PLAN GARFIELD - GOLDENWEST AREA huntington beach planning division _ - R3 � r�' 3• co«••uooa c. L. M2-0 R3 A-0 MI-0 R 3 = FM 4 1 Ra'0'5 ul•0 "I r, /rO: uo U-0•CD . r., i .�•..4i1 bt2�01..i 1 = R5 rs i MI-0 _RS R 2 ` As trsa— i ,j L=K R2 (�R2 •� R5 RS+� R2 ^ rt2�� 4 • *0`' GARf1ElD 2 RA•0 CI R2 M! M� - ,,� R 5 R2 „: R 2 O RA-0 .1"..�.,.,». a RA Off' R2 - * R2- R2 r Rz • MI • n�i�utr.c*u U-0- ns tta.sa� F�aa� R2-Q-PD lraO PD G C 0 U-0-CD . f RI o u IL CZ-O-CD R5-0-CD R2.O-rrxo( g 4 Rz Ili I Figure 2-•4 GARFIELD/GOUENWEST AREA Zoning huntington beach planning division A i 1 s i Much of the area being considered has at one time or another been designated for industrial use. Four factors influenced the industrial designation: 1) alignment of the proposed Route I and 39 freeways in proximity to the area; 2) proximity and relationship to the Central Industrial Corridor; 3) existing Industrial and oil-related uses and; 4) availability of vacant land suitable for Industrial development. In 1972 and 1974, the State deleted the Route I and 39 freeways respectively from its Master Plan, considerably lessening the area's desirability as a location for new industrial development. Since then, the concept of a north-south freeway between the Son Diego Freeway and the coast has been indicated on the 1978 Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways, although the precise alignment has not been resolved. The area was addressed in the first Amendment to the Phase I Land Use Element in March, 1975. At that time, the site was placed in planning reserve In order to allow for more comprehensive planning. When apartment projects were approved on several parcels at Crystal and Garfield, adjacent to oil i operations, the Planning Department requested an amendment to change the planning reserve designation. In October, 1976, General Plan Amendment 76-2 redesignated the entire area to medium density residential. This redesignation was based on the findings presented in the Industrial Land Use Study in June, 1976. The study concluded that the southern corridor contained an excess of vacant industrial property which was either unsuitable for Industrial park development or attractive only to marginal uses. The study further concluded that the City could not maximize fiscal benefits from such uses. Staff recommended a program of Industrial land reduction unless the City was willing to commit public expenditures toward improvements attractive to Industry. Since 1976, the Planning Commission has considered various approaches to implementing the General Plan's residential designation. The zoning is now fragmented among RA-0, R2, Cl and MI designations. Uniform residential zoning would create non-conforming industrial uses, while industrial zoning could not g1jarantee an orderly residential transition. As a result, the Planning Commission directed staff to undertake a comprehensive study of the area in 1978, and recommend specific zoning and development policies for the Commission's consideration. Since completion of the Garfield-Goldenwest Study, the Commission has debated the issues and tabled action pending further study. In the meantime, various owners within the area of concern have made the present request for a General Plan amendment to change the residential designation to industrial. The nine individuals requesting the General Plan amendment own industrial or oil property covering approximately 19 acres, or 20 percent, of the total 97 acre study area. The Huntington Beach Company i3 the largest single owner within the area, with 30 percent of the total property. The Mola Development Company owns another I I percent. The City of Huntington Beach and the Cambro Company are thirtl and fourth with eight percent and six percent, respectively. The remainder is divided among 44 small owners. 9 e I I 2.1.2 Analysis The group of property owners have requested that the entire 97 acre study area be redesignated industrial. The analysis addresses three land use alternatives. The first option is retention of the medium density residential designation. The second alternative is a change t) industrial. The third alternative provides for a mix of medium density residential and industrial categories in order to minimize the creation of non-conforming uses. The three alternatives are depicted in Figure 2-5. I. Land Use The area of concern occupies a key location in the City at the Main Street entrance to the Civic Center area and the Downtown business district. Goldenwest Street abuts the study area and connects the beaches with Central Park and the City's Interior. Although now general planned medium density residential, the area is essentially transitional between the Central Industrial Corridor to the north and designated residential areas to the south. This is manifested in the diversity of uses occupying the site. Oil extraction, industrial services and manufacture, and apartment developments characterize the area. The establishment of the southern boundary of the Central Indusirial Corridor has been an issue for several years. Both Garfield Avenue and Clay Avenue have served this purpose, and numerous arguments exist to support either alternative. If the existing Garfield boundary is maintained (Alternative 1), a residential designation of the subject property is justified by the following considerations: a. The Southern Pacific Railroad terminates at Garfield Avenue; the area to the south derives no direct benefits from the railroad operations. While the importance of rail access has declined with the advent of a comprehensive network of freeways and arterial highways, the railroad still constitutes a desirable feature for locating industrial uses. The abandonment of the railroad through the study area reinforces the logic of maintaining Garfield as the southern terminus of the industrial corridor. b. The a'tractiveness of industrial property diminishes with increasing distance from freeway and highway systems. The deletion of the Route I and 39 freeways from the State Master Plan has significantly reduced the desirability of potential Industrial sites In the southern reaches of the Central Industrial Corridor. The future realignment of Gothnrd Street to connect with Crystal Street will improve truck access to the distant Son Diego Freeway; but until this project is constructed (estimated at two to five years by the Department of Public Works), highway and freeway access will 1� 10 GARFIELD Alternative i 1 I' s - t r y• y4. # •.fr 'd ' ••yX ti i GARFIELD Alternative 2 w•r• w• •• •� •• • r • r • r••rr• •rr r••r • •r• • • r1i /• •r•.�r •••• ••• ••• •rr• rrr• •r• • • + rr.r + — - ••• ••Ir •• • ••• • fi�.w�r• • r • r •• ••r•• •'•�ir•r •�: •j w.I wir •'f'�•� f : Ii1 :• •r••rr•:•I •rrr ••• ••• /•r•••e►-•�•• • • • • •rrrr•••• III• •. • •`� -emigre:• :r•�'•:r• ••�A• ••• •• ••••• 1 � •rrr ••• •rr re•r••rr• •r • •�.� � ; r��r _l._� •rr •rr•• r• • sr• • I.sss •r• rfr •r• .�.r• • •r • • •I• • •••1• ••r• ••• rr• r•••r•• I•a • •••f••• • •rr••• •Ir •r••• r•r• •f• •• f • • •r•Ir•r• • w •-f-s- •rr • . • •I•�rr• i ••:: ::: .r:•: •::a r f:► ••9 �i� •••� rrr••rr• •r•• ••• •••• ••r er•F •rr :rr:I:::• i Vr •r•• ••• •rrr• 4 ••• r •••�••• r•• •r•1• I . GARFIELD Alternative 3 of lriri r.r . . rr•• i• '� • ••I, iri irrrr•"r1•°• •••• ••• ••• •••• ' •• •••••• 100.010 .6 •r11_ • rrr••♦ � •r • Y' •• ICI I•s�r���:: ••••r• w••• r•• rr•rfr•• •r •rrrrr i • ••r• ••r• ••• •• • a • �_.•.• ••• •••• rr• •rr• • •• •r•••I •• f •••• ••• • • • •• u Y• r•I/r•r ••r••�• : I•f :•:0 6 rI•:• 4- j � ,..: ... 7—LEGEND 7 / I lF uff -T�- I iY j Medium Density Residential Industrial i Figure Z•S ALJMwA Garfield/Goidenwest Area Land Use Alternatives huntington beach planning division remain poor. Property in the study area will likely be attractive only to miscellaneous service indistries or warehousing until more desirable sites are depleted elsewhere in the City and County. C. Main Street traverses a portion of the study area diagonally, creating small irregular shaped parcels which are more conducive to residential development. Main Street south of Garfield also serves as the Itateway" to the Civic Center and Downtown areas. Unless zoned restrictively through MI-A and CD designations, industrial uses and the traffic they create would detract significantly from this function. However, more restrictive zoning on the lots fronting Main Street would increase the difficulty of compliance with development code requirements. d. The parcels fronting Garfield Avenue between Goldenwest Street and the railroad right-of-way are smaller than the minimum standard required for Industrial development, and ownerships are fragmented. Some consolidation will be necessary If buildable sites are to be created. The existence of many small lots along Garfield also implies numerous curb cuts and hazardous arterial access. To reduce the number of access points off Garfield Avenue would require changing the City easements paralleling the south side of the lots to 15 foot alleyways. With numerous small developments, however, even a 15 foot alley would be inadequate to mitigate truck congestion. Although not presently existing, the lots fronting Garfield would be more conducive to residential development with rear alley access. e. Approximately one half of the area south of Garfield Avenue is zoned for medium density residential uses and a large rwmber of residential units have already been developed or is under construction (Figure 2-4). If the southern boundary of the Central Industrial Corridor is extended to Clay Avenue (Alternative 2), on industrial designation is supported by the following f actors: a. Approximately 450 acres, or 21 percent of the City's vacant land, is designated industrial by the General Plan. As of January, 1979, 925 acres have developed as industrial uses at an annual rate of 12 • approximately 40 acres. If this trerxi continues, all remaining vacant industrial land would develop by 1990. The addition of the study site increases the industrial area available for development by approxiamtely 58 acres, or 13 percent of the current vacant industrial land. The remaining 39 acres are now encumbered by residential, industrial, commercial and public uses. b. Much of the vacant land within the area of concern is now devoted to oil production, while the leading developed use is industrial. As long as these uses continue to operate, industrial development would be more compatible than residential development. Adverse impacts would include noise, motor emissions, and odors generated i by oil recompletion equipment and industrial trucking; congestion j caused by the mix of residential traffic and industrial trucking; and general safety hazards from oil pumps and machinery. If the area develops piecemeal, street improvements would be constructed incrementally. The interim use of residential streets by trucking and heavy equipment would adversely impact the new improvements and result in costly maintenance. C. Fe.=idential uses south of Garfield Avenue would isolate one of the C„y's most substantial industries, the Cambro Manufacturing I Company, from the Central Inckistrial Corridor and would compound the compatibility problems that presently exist. Likewise, the resource production area south of Garfield Avenue and west of Goldenwest Street would also be isolated from the 1 industrial corridor. d. The proposed oligoment of Gothard Street with Crystal Street will provide access to the area which does not presently exist for truck traffic. This improvement as well as the depletion of prime industrial sites elsewhere wili increase the attractiveness of the study area to quality light manufacturing and mixed commercial/industrial uses over the long-term. The two foregoing scenerios assume that the entire area of concern either retains the medium density residential land use designation or is changed to industrial. Alternative 3 divides the area among residential and industrial uses primarily along the lines of existing development. a. Almost 60 percent of the area is still vacant or in oil production which is expected to phase out over the next 10 to 15 years. Industrial and residential uses, occupy most of the remaining area. These division- imply that the study area need not be entirely committed to any single use. Residential and industrial developments are reasonably concentrated, which minimizes non-conforming uses. The City Council recently adopted an 13 ordinance to allow the establishment of non-conforming industrial uses in RA districts which do not have permanent zoning. However, such use must result from displacement through governmental acquisition of the parcel upon which the use was originally located. Related to Alternative 3, mast existing industrial and/or oil uses occur west from the lots fronting Crystal Street to Goldenwest Street and past of the railroad right-of-way, while residential development is concentrated in the middle of the site and along Main Street. This provides for continuity of the westerly industrial -j area with the Central Industrial Corridor to the north while + retaining compatibility with resource production west of Goldenwest Street. The Inclusion of industrial on the lots fronting Crystal Street on the east side would accommodate existing uses and minimize adverse traffic Impacts, but would result in close proximity of residential and industrial uses. The block east of the railroad right-of-way is dominated by industrial uses; namely, the Cambro factory and City water facility. An industrial land use designation on the property would accommodate these uses but the area would be physically isolated from the Central Industrial Corridor. 2. Economic Considerations The Planning staff in cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc. conducted a II fiscal impact analysis of the three land use alternatives using the computerized methodology developed for the City. For the purposes of analysi-, the revenues and expenditures of each alternative were projected over a 10 year period, 1980-1990. The results are detailed in Appendix A. 3. Housing The City recently adopted a state mandated revision to the Housing Element of the General Plan, which includes policy aimed at increasing housing opportunities for households with low and moderate incomes. The revised element includes provisions for consideration of an inclusionary zoning ordinance that could require a certain percentage of new residential developments to be affordable to lower income households. Areas designated medium and high density offer the best opportunities to provide such housing, especially if density borwses are to be utilized. However, most areas designated medium or high density In the City are developed. Developable land within the area of concern represents 58 acres or approximately 16 percent of the total (356 acres) remaining vacant medium density land in the City. 14 . The proposed amendment of the Garfield - Goldenwest Area to industrial would further limit the City's options in the provision of affordable housing by reducing the already small amount of medium density area remaining in the City. If the medium density residential designation is retained on the subject property, approximately 900 dwelling units could be added to the City's housirij stack at ultimate development. Adoption of an inciusionary zoning ordinance could potentially require that between 90 and 225 units be available for these households. However, fragmented land ownership and the phase-out of oil operations wil! likely generate piecemeal development (even with PD zoning) and reduce the potential for inclusionary lower cost housing. Alternative 3 provides for mixed residential and industrial use designations. Lower income housing potential would be extremely limited under this scenario because most of the residential area between Crystal and the railroad right-of-way is developed or under construction, and the remaining vacant land is highly fragmented in ownership. 4. Public Services and Utilities t i a. Sewers The study area is presently serviced by a 24-inch County sewer trunkline that extends south in Crystal Street above Garfield and then east in Garfield Avenue. A 12-inch interceptor ties into the trunkline along Garfield Avenue west of Crystal Street. Eight-inch sewer lines in Crystal Street and Holly Street north of Main Street i direct flows from existing developments to the County trunkline. f An night-irx:h sewer in the alley between Crystal and Holly serves developments fronting Garfield Avenue. Sewer facilities ire ' d-picted in Appendix B. Additional sewers will be required to service the study area at ultimate residential or industrial development. The eight-inch alley sewer will be extended west to Crystal Street as each lot develops. The remainder of the parcels along Garfield west of Crystal Street will lateral directly to the 124nch Interceptor. Additional eight-indi lines are planned in Stewart and Goldenwest Streets to tie into the 12-inch interceptor at Garfield Avenue. A firs! eight-inch sewer will conduct future flows along Clay Avenue to Main Street and then into the existing Holly Street line. The Department of Public Works has reviewed the Impacts associated with the three proposed alternatives in relation to the findings of the final Sewer Master Plain prepared by Lowry and Associates. The study indicates that there are no deficiencies expected within the general area. The existing and proposed sewer system can accommodate flows generated by either medium density residential or industriol developments. ARX 15 b. Water Water is available to the area via a 42-inch trunkline which extends along Goldenwest Street and then east along C'!cv Avenue. Six- and eight-inch lines in all local streets one, Main Street tie into the trunk line at Clay. The Department of Public Works indicates that the area west of Crystal Street is located within Water Pressure Zone No. 2. Normal line water pressures in the zone are presently inadequate to provide a suitable level of service, and must be increased by means of a booster station. The existing booster station is incapable of ' serving the subject area whether developed medium density residential or industrial. In addition, the existing six-inch lines are undersized and will require upgrading to eight-inch lines to serve most types of industrial users or residential developments. A change from medium density residential to industrial would also require increased flow to supply water and meet fire flow standards. To meet these demands, a 12-inch looped water main system in Garfield Avenue would be required for industrial uses versus an eight- or ten-inch system for medium density residential developments. Water facilities are shown in Appendix C. c. Storm Drains { With the excepSion of the apartments at Garfield and Holly, and i several industrial businesses along Crystal Street, local street: and arterinls lack curbs and gutters. There also are- no drainage lines presently serving the area. This results in intermittent ponding during periods of heavy rainfall. Most runoff is directed by gravity flow to the intersections of Garfield and the local streets where It ponds. Pending also occurs at Holly and Main. The study area is located within the benefit area of the Old Town drainage project which the City has so far constructed at a cost of approximately $2,251,000 (Appendix D). Approximately $1,000,000 for the project has been funded with Housing and Community Development monies. The main Delaware trunkline from Adams to Garfield is complete. One branch of the project is proposed to extend west from Delaware Street into the area of concern: a 36-inch line will extend to the intersection of Garfield and Main; a 33-inch line will then continue westward along Garfield Avenue for about 400 feet while a 24-inch line branches south along Main Street fnr a similar distance. The segments of the Old Town project within the study area will not be phased in until development pressures increase. The Department of Public Wortcs has indicated that a change in land Use designettion from medium density residential to industrial would increase storm runoff approximately five percent. i6 This increase would not have a significant effect on the capability of the drainage facility proposed to serve the area. d. Parks The area of concern is located approximately one-half rnile from the planned FL-ntingtan Community Park and three-fourths of a mile from Flunt=ngton Central Park. No neighborhood parks are currently planned for the immediate area, but these two facilities could be considered adequate to serve recreation and park needs generated by residential development within the area of concern. However, there is presently no adopted City policy which credits regional and community parks as serving neighborhood park needs. Until such a change in City policy officially occurs, the study area would be deficient in neighborhood park facilities by approximately II acres under the medium density residential ind by five acres under the mixed industrial-residential alternatives. e. Police and Fire Protection The Police Department operate; from one police facility located at Main Street and Yorktown Avenue. The present authorized level of police manning Is approximately 1.17 officers per 1,000 persons. In order to maintain the current level of service, police levels would have to be increased by three officers fix the medium density residential alternative, and by one officer for the industrial proposal. Due to the close proximity of the site to the police y station, a constant patrol of the area results from police units leaving and returning to the facility, thereby reducing the: need for additional patrols. Thk is an important consideration since no new officers are expected to be hired because of Proposition 13 - related cutbacks. On-site security protection could minimize the increased demand on the Police Department. Of prime importance to the adequacy of fire protection coverage is response time, which is basically a function of the distan.e from j the fire station to the incident locotion and the averages speed of I travel by fire engines. Fire stations should be located to provide an average response time of five minutes or less in 90 percent of the incidents. The study area Is located entirely within this response limit and can be adequately serviced. A com;arisen of land use alternatives indicates no difference in response time is expected. As the area of concern develops, higher levels of manning will be necessary if the Fire Department Is to maintain the level of service required. Huntington Beach Planning Department, Parks Anal sis 1977, pp. 6-9. 1 Adtk 4 1 / N I f. Schoo Is The study area is served by Smith Elementary, Dwyer Intermediate, and Huntington Beach High School. Smith and Dwyer schools have remaining capacities of approximately 275 and 125 students, respectively. However, the additional students generated by already approved or pending developments (such as Seacliff IV and the "Ranch" townhouse development) will overburden these schools. If the area of concern is developed at the projected intensities, an increase of 199 elementary and 66 middle school students would result under the medium density residential alternative. The mixed industrial-residential alternative would increase elementary school enrollment by 56 students and intermediate school enrollment Lby 19 students. Expansion of existing school facilities or redistricting may be necessary. in general, the Huntington Beach Elementary School District is experiencing reduced enrollment and does have excess capacity in many of its schools. It should therefore be able to accommodate the projected enrollment generated by this and other projects In the area. The additional high school students generated, approximately 69 under the medium density residential alternative and 19 under the mixer industrial residential option, will further impact the already overcrowded conditions ut Huntington Beach High School. The declining enrollment in the elementary and intermediate schools should result in a long-term decline in irigir school requirements. However, already approved or pending developments will further adversely impact existing conditions in the near term. g. Gas and Electrical Utilities Natural gas service and electrical service are provided Irj the Southern California Gas Company and the Edison Company, respectively. A 12 inch gas supply line runs aloe Goldenwest Street. A four inch service line exLts in Garfield Avenue east of Stewart Street with two inch lines serving apartment complexes on Holly Street and industrial uses on Crystal Street. Overhead 66 KV and 12 KV electrical lines run along Garfield Avenue while 12 KV lines are located along the local streets. Gas service is generally provided as a normal extension of existing facilities. However, the availability of natural gas service is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company Is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. Federal Al=k 18 • regulatory agencies can also affect gas supply. Should these agencies take any cation which affects gas supply or the conditions under which service is available, gas service will be provided according to the revised conditions. The Southern California Edison Company has indicated that electrical load requirements can be met through 1979 provided that electrical demand does not exceed estimates and there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply. The total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if plans to proceed wish future construction of new generating facilities are delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1984. h. Solid Waste Disposal The Rainbow Disposal Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Beach. No local service corstraints are expected under the industrial and medium density residential land use designatiais. Orange County Refuse Disposal irxticates that the refuse transfer station in Huntington Beach will operate indefinitely. The Coyote Canyon landfill site is projected to rea--h capacity during 1981, but several replacement sites will begin operation at that time in accordance with the Orange County Solid Waste Management Plan. 5. Traffic Circulation The Garfield-Goldenwest Area is served by a number of arterials and local streets. Goldenwest Street, Garfield Avenue, and Main Street provide primary access to the study area. Goldenwesi Street (a designated major arterial) has a daily traffic volume of 14,200 vehicles, while Garfield Avenue (a designated primary arterial) carries a volume of 2,600 vehicles per day. Main Street has a daily traffic volume of 15,000 vehicles. Clay Avenue and Huntington Street provide perimeter access on the south and east, respectively. Local streets and alleys serve the area's interior: Stewart, Crystal, and Holly Streets function as local streets, while an east-west easement funtions as an alley. The local streets are unimproved for the most part, and are used mainly as access roasts to the oil field and various industrial businesses. The alley provides access to the lots fronting Garfield Avenue. It is estimated that the traffic generated by the potential land uses for the area will range between 7,080 and 12,450 vehicle trips per day. The medium density residential designation would result in an average 11,080 19 i i I I I daily vehicle trips. The indt,strial alternative would produce 9,070 trips per day, while the mixed industrial and residential option generates approximately 9,740 daily trips. When the projected traff&'c volumes are compare, with street capacities, all of the streets will have volumes considerably less than their design capacity. The study area has been a focus of many unresolved traffic issues. A Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways adopted in 1976 was designed to accommodate projected traffic volume, improve circulation to residential cnd industrial devc . prnents in the immediate area with minimum traffic mix, and improve access to the Downtown and beach areas of the City. The major changes adopted in the Plan were: 1) the extension of Lake Street as a primary arterial north from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue along the railroad right-of-wny (Lake Street to join Main Stree at Garfield); 2) the vacation of Main from Garfield Avenue to Holly Street, and from Clay Avenue to the proposed Gothard-Crystal Street alignment (Main Street to be reduced to a 60-foot local strec` between Clay Avenue and Holly Street), and 3) the realignment of Gothard Street to connect vith Crystal Street. The Gothard-Crystal alignment south of Garfield was designated as a primary arterial, having a width of 100 feet. As a result of Planning Commission and City Council deliberation on the circulation issues within the general area, certain modifications hm e been or are now being mode to the original plan. In March, 19790 the City Council deleted Lake Street between Yorktown and Garfield from the Circulation Plan. This decision necessitates that Main Street be redesignated as a primary arterial along Its present alignment. The Main Street designation is proposed for addition to the Plan in Circulation Element Amendment 80-1. The Gothard-Crystal realignment is to be retained as a primary arterial, and will improve ir,{:ustrial access to regionel highway and freeway systems. It will also reduce potential conflicts between industrial and residential traffic in the local area. 6. Environmental Issue i This section identifies the significant environmental impacts associated !' with the land uses evaluated. Q. Geotechnical The study area lies immediately north of the North Branch Fault within the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone. The fault is reflected on the surface by a series of hills and depressions. Reservoir Hill directly south of Clay Avenue is the most prominent feature in the 20 belt with the topography generally sloping north and east through the area of concern. The portion of the study area is within the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, but is not within a designated { earthquake hazard areal. Any development, however, whether industrial or residential, may be subject to seismic activity by virtue of its location within the Newport-Inglewood Zone. Appropriate structural requirements would be imposed by the City on all such projects. In addition, an engineering geologist analysis I may also be required. 1 i b. P4oise I Regardless of the land use designation implemented, a mix of industrial and residential uses will characterize the area of concern in the future. Mixed industrial truck and residential traffic will create high noise levels in some areas. Any new residential development adjacent to Goldenwest Street will be subjected to 1 noise levels in excess of the normally acceptable levels for ! residential areas. T- teal exterior treatments such as walls and berms may not be feasible to reduce the Ldn 70 level to the City standard of Ldn 60 for exterior and Ldn kS for interior noise levels. In this Case, special mitigation measures such as unit modifications, building placement, and barrier construction, would be required to reduce the noise to acceptable levels. Areas adjacent to Garfield Avenue, Crystal Street and Main Street would also be subject to noise levels that are in excess of City standards. Residential developments will also be subject to noise levels in excess of Ldn 60 from oil pumps and engines as production phases out in the study area. These impacts can be mitigated through barriers,oil equipment mufflers, and building placement. c. Air Quality i Development under industrial and medium density land use.? will effect air quality within the South Coast region. An industrial land ! use designation would generate less pollutants than medium density i residential use - approximately 2.05 tons of emissions per day and 2.31 tons per day respectively. The primary air emissions '+ generated include carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, particulates, and sulfur oxides from stationary and mobile sources. Automobile end truck traffic produce most of the pollutants with a small portion attributable to local heating and oil activities. I Based upon the provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic hazard Zone Act and criteria of the State Mining and Gc- logy Board. AMC& 21 i 1 I . Figure 2-6 summarizes the air emissions generated by the three land use alternatves. The estimated tonnage of pollutants may be reduced as never motor vehicles replace older models, new advances in engine design are implemented, or public transportation is expanded. 2.1.3 Staff Recommendation Ultimate development of the area as medium density residential will preserve compatibility with the Seocliff Planned Community to the west, and other medium density areas to the east and south. Thy subject property also occtpies a key location in the City, between Central Park and the Civic Center/Downtown areas. A medium density designation enhances the "gateway" function of Main Street (ord possibly Goldenwest Street) which serves these areas. Another consideration is that a large number of residential units have been developed or are under construction. While non-conforming uses would occur under either industrial or residential designations the environmental effects (air, traffic, and noise) associated with industrial development could be expected to be more severe in impact on surrouwing uses than those associated with residential development. An argument could be made to seaport an industrial designation on at least the block east of the rolls:oad right-of-wuy since it is dominated by the Combro plant and City water facility. An industrial land use designation on the property would accommoautp these uses but the area would be physically isolated from the Central Industrial Corridor to the north. A final consideration is that a rnedium density residential land use de•'gnoticn would enhance tht City's options in the provision of affordable housing to low and moderate income households. The medium density would offer an opportunity to provide such housing under an inclusionary zoning ordinance with the utilization of density bonuses. Staff, iherefore, recommends that the Garfield.-Goldenwest area retain the existing medium density residential land use designation on the entire site. In order to guide new development and encourage compatibility with oil operations and industrial uses as they phase out, the Planning Commission should consider implementation of the policy recommendations on pages 17-21 in the Garfield-Goldenwest Study. 2.1.4 Planning Commission Recomn•o-indation The Planning Commission recommends that the Garfield-Goldenwest area be continued to Land Use Element Amendment 80-2. The Commission directed staff to investigate the feasibility and legal ramifications of placing a resource production overlay on the existing medium density residential designation to protect oil uses from premature residential development. 22 FIGURE 2-6 PROJECTED DAILY EtAISSIONSI MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVE I jEmission Source Tons of Emissions/Da Mobile 1.70 Stationary .61 i TOTAL 2.31 i INDUSTRIAL ALTERNATIVE 2 Emission Source Tons :)f Emissions/D2y Mobile 1.86 Stationary .19 TOTAL 2.05 MIXED INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVE 3 Emission Source Tons of EmissionsLDay Mobile 1.85 Stationary .30` TOTAL 2.15 i ' I � Developed from EPA AP-42 for the average vehic'% and stationary source In the South Coast Air Basin. now 23 i I DQ 2.2 Beach-Talbert Area A General Plan Amendment 80-1 addresses a second area of concern located south of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard (Figure 2-7). The Amendment request being considered was filed by the Woodtree Development Company in September, 1979. I 2.2.1 Background The applicant's original amendment request was for a change from low density ' residential to medium density residential and concerned only 4.1 acres. The area of concern has been expanded by the Planning staff to include the adjacent 1.71.-.acres o —encyclopedia loft; to encourage development of compatible land uses within the general area. This study area was the subject of a similar effort in 1977 when the entire 11.81 ocres of land were redesignated from general industrial and general commercial to the present low density residential status. The petitioned area at that time encompassed 4.5 acres. The only alternative land uses under consideration in this amendment are low and medium density residential. A commercial land use alternative is not practical because of the lack of expos.,re to Beach Boulevard, and industrial consideration is precluded by existing residential development to the north and south of the study area. The present expanded area of concern involves a total of 11.81 acres located on the south side of Talbert Avenue approximately 430 feet west of Beach Boulevard. In addition to the 4.1 acres owned by the amendment petitioner, five acres to the west and 1.06 acres to the east are held by two other properly owners. The remaining 1.65 acres of encyclopedia is.'lots are.owned by 20-se crate owners. 1 e`eiiisting General Plan designation low density and the existing zoning is RI-PD. Though the majority of the study area is vacant, the few existing uses include nine older single family dwelling units and several Industrial sheds. Adjacent residential uses include three medium density develoFments containing 148 apartment units on 12.5 acres directly across Tolbert to the north, and a 62 unit single family planned development now under construction i 1 on 9.5 acres directly to the south. To the east on Beach Bc.-ilavard is a 5.7 acre neighborhood shopping center with an automobile dealer to the south of It. Industrially zoned land immediately adjacent to the west is currently 1 vacant; nearby industrial u.-es along Redondo Lane, approximately 0550 feet west of the area of concern, include an auto wrtcker, vurious light manufacturing and wholesale operations, and a lumber yard. ACft 24 r I, 1 • �G UOISIAIP f5uluuold t4ODaq ua46uilunq I V V311V 'CIAIG H:)V38 - ld391d1 NV14 1V2l3N30 �- vanRt� ` VA3N 3 9 RM IVI X.l_"aQQNI /unL ir,-hL(SN3Q Wg(43W MEN IMISS39M 3)13j0 j?6/u.n •r„ ALISN30 Al ...�..: 3*JYd5 NUO b/un 2 y 31yl53 35 it 713Hf1d �dl� �3llllW 0 3 WiNNIS39 ' ...}•:iFFi's£':'i .}'sr:}}i.....t' �:� '�=i�•s^ s:=£{ :ffff• s . • r ■ o a •£Zf•• ' }• SZg{{:t=t {£:: ;•' P■■rMN�!!i■ �.1 .... F off}t� �{ 'IiF�i {�t ��:i. ! • • r • N •••• : •.• ; 5'{:{=�� �� ,::. :��:: it ■ N N M a Y �••i :� F£ .......... orwa■a"■wa■%a •••• �.•• •.......•.•:: ..: :.• .r...r• farOlw■■!!■! ■ ��.X ............. . :::. _ r ... .� . .•. ...':• • R a a M R r �t aav!■■r■lRra■■ �,r41,h'J. :.• `::::::•::::':':��..: � R•aNRR■!•rrYr ■ a ■ ■ ! ■ a • ! ! '':��a�w+ • ■ a a a a ! a • • ! ■ ■ r �, " ^ram`-•�•=+-•=1�•:r: :•:::: .•:••• • • _ ■ ............ . :•..... 0 a r R • a•alRq r ■ i ! • ■' .�J►•t'a..i .•.,w.'• ................... :::: :.;..� r■•■!"fir ■ ■ r r . ■ M A • ,j4• ! �1��•••f.. r r ! • � fir` +> > t n/1 ' t its«::�.:t -;.,-'-• ,�}` � .• s'i£i£££:f£{£ rR • ■ r ! • r ■ • ■ r•■ aRla r•"am' ; AS!`•• �: �� F'jj "£iiFft=tit::}:: ! ■ a • r a Y ! ■ a • • • ! • • ti ,afl� £::i'22£ ii£••i•i£ • a ■ R ■ b w a ■ R r • • • R • • •}+ Ir f= raw • • a ■ • a ■ Nr ■ r ! M �t"� i L•11 �a j�`} �•�r� F tti: ■ ! • ! r ■ r a w a e a .,,�• ,�•�.,�';+.:,_ E • •�,C:.:� iTii� iF F£Fi:. w • • ■ • • ■•■■••M ■ •�i"•f•.'.�4s ..,1,..,•... R R ■ b r ■ ■ • "�• • .:::}:;}sttf _. r}tt _:{ :..•:«.r... ■ a a r r r ■ ■ a ! Iti- • iss. RN ■ • rRa ■ rar --.�--+•+i �. �:::::::. i s £::s si :;•:£ �:£ ! ar ! ■ ■ r A a ■ r r ice.-.-•'• r�,{ . :.;.... � ': {i.iSii:��ii?i�{�£iz• •-N_a_!_•_•_•_■_!-•-•.a.r. i•'.'.4.��.....�--. 1 ' r VV 2.2.2 Analysis 1. Land Use The existing low density residential designation allows a maximum of seven units per acre, or 82 units total, cnd will generate an estimated 282 people. The applicant's request for a redesignation to medium density would result in a maximum of 15 units per acre, or 177 units over the expanded area of concern, and would generate an estimated population of 416 persons. An important issue in this amendment involves fragmented ownership. In order to meet open space and parking requirements in a planned development of this size, some consolidation of ownerships would most likely be required. Redesignation a► the area of concern to medium density could induce consolidation of some parcels and improve the feasibility of a planned development. Medium density residential development is located directly north of Talbert Avenue. A redesignation of the study area to medium density would be compatible with these uses. Abutting the area to the south is another area of low density residential. Although not connected by aiy local streets, a walkway to Terry Park on the west will join the southerly development and the area of concern. The remaining commercial uses to the east and industrial uses to the west of the study area would probob!y have few compatibility problems with either type of density designation provided that PD zoning is retained to ensure adequate buffering. 2. Housing As noted in Section 2.1.2, the City's recently adopted revision to the ' Hoilsing Element calls for a feasibility study of inclusionary zoning mechanisms. Although the City's ordinance code does not allow for density bonuses or inclusionary zoning at this time, it is possible that such mechanisms could be adopted and applied to the study area during the implementation phase of the Housing Element. Areas designated medium and high density residential offer the best opportunities to provide affordable housing, especially if density bonuses are to be utilized. However, most areas designated medium or high density in the City ore developed. Only 356 acres of the City's remaining vacant land is designated medium density residential. Redesignation of the s�bject property to medium density residential would thus enhance the City's options in the provision of affordable housing. A medium density designation would result in a maximum of 177 snits as opposed to 82 units under low density residential. Adoption of an inclusionary zoning ordinance could potentially require that between 17 and 44 units be available for these households under a medium density designation. ?6 , to � 3. Public Services and Facilities a. - Sewers The Night-inch sewer line which serves the area of concern is presently operating at caapocity. A_10-inch relief system Ps.planned wh!ch.�will ,_ accommodate, ultimate ...development ..ct,.....existing allowabi den.Iit(f;s. in,the area. The Department of Public Works teas sated that �tiftile a rtne'cfium density designation of the study nr_o would cause the relief sewer to operate of capacity, it would rat significantly overburden the local system or the area downstream. h. Woter Water service b available to the area of concem via an eight inch line. The Department of Public Works Indicated that this facility will adequately service the area regardless of the eventual density of development. However, developers in the area would be required to design ar�d install a fire hydrant and water main distribution system for the area, c. Drairvge I The area of concern presently drains north toward Talbert Avenue 1 and then west to Redondo Lane in the form of surface flow. Final plans have been drawn and construction scheduled to begin an a 34- and 40-inch drainage pipoe for this area (Appendix E). From Redondo there is an undeveloped section in the drainage system which runs north and then west into Huntington Central 1"cirk. Before any development is permitted in the study area, regardless of density, this section will have to be completed. The Department of Public Works indicates that the planned drainage system from the study area to Redondo Lane will be adequate to accommodate medium density development. Both it and the recently constructed laterals and catch basins across Talbert Avenue to the north were designed with the intent of servicing iow or medium de,tsity development in the stuc*/ area. �7 it , 1 d. Parks The area of concern has a sufficient amount of park space available to accommodate a redesignation to medium density. Terry Park, a recently developed five acre neighborhood park, is located fo the south fronting on Taylor Street. A walkway from the area of concern to the park via the adjoining development has already been approved. Also, Huntington Central Park is located approximately one-half mile from the study area with access provided along Talbert Avenue. e. Police and Fire Protection The police department operates from one police facility located at Main Street and Yorktown Avenue. The present authorized level of police rnannirej is approximately 1.17 officers per 1,000 persons. Development under either low density or medium density would require no more than one additional officer. Of prime importance to the adequacy of fire protection coverage is respa-ise time, which is basically a function of the distance from the fire station to the incident location and the average speed of travel by fire engine. Fire stations should be located to provide an averag, response time of five minutes or less in 90 percent of the incidents. The study area is located entirely within this response limit and can be adequately serviced. When comparing the land use alternatives, no difference in response time is expected. As the area of concern develops, higher levels of manning will be necessay if the Fire Department is to maintain the level of service requi red. f. Schools The area of concern lies within the Ocean View Elementary School District. A low density land use would generate an estimated 60 elementary school aged children. A change in land use to medium density would generate an estimated 57 elementary school aged children. This difference is a result of smaller household size. The Ocean View School [District has irvJicated that these children would under present circumstances attend Crestview Elementary School, which is located on Talbert Avenue east of Beach 3oulevard. The capacity at Crestview is 780 students and the current enrollment is 599. The estimated number of students generated by the existing low density designation would not over tax the capacity of the school, but the fewer students generated by medium density development would have a more favorable impact on the school. 28 I The study area ;s also served by the Huntington Beach High School District. A low or medium density residential land use w�s� generate an estimated 19 and 14 students, respectively. students would offend Qceanview High School which is located approximately IVx miles from the area of concern. While any additional students would contribute to the already overcrowded conditions within the school district, declining enrollment in the elementary school system should result in a long-term decline in high school requirements. g. Gas and Electrical Utilities Natural gas service and electrical ser.-ice are urovided by the Southern California Gas Ccunpany and the Edison Company respectively. A f atrch least rnand ain gwest. An as supp 1ire overhead is at 12KV �ni Talbert Avenue, rt ng he south side of Talbert and serves the electrical line runs along t subject property. Gas service is generally provided as a normal extension of existing facilities. However, the availability of natural gas service is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. Asa public utility, the Soithem California Gas company is under the } jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. Federal reg►Actory agencies con also affect gas supply. Should these agencies take cny action which affects gas supply or the conditions ; under which service is ovailahle, gas service will be provided according to the revised conditions. 'The Southern CalifoCaliforniatits Indicated thatio Edison Company ' electrical load requirements can be met through 1979 provided that electrical demand does not exceed estimates and there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply. The total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually. If plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities are delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1984. h. 5-311d Waste Disposal The Rainbow Disposal Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Beach. W local service eonstraints are expected undet the low or medium density residential land use designations. lop 29 4. Traffic Circulation Access to the study area is taken via Talbert Avenue which is designated a primary arterial. The nearest major intersections on Talbert are Beach Boulevard, a designated major arterial to the east, and Gothard Street to the west, which is a secondary arterial. Present traffic volumes for these arterials in vicinity of the study area are 4,300 daily trips on Talbert Avenue, 45,000 daily trips on Beach Boulevard, and 5,300 trips per day on Gothard Street. The design capacities for these streets are 30,000, 45,000 anti 20,000 vehicle trips per day, respectively. It is estimated that the existing desigr.:.tion of low density residentiai will result in 820 vehicle trips per day, with I,700 trips predicted for a redesignation to medium density. These volumes, when added to the existing traffic on Talbert and Gothard fail, for short of exceeding their design capacities. The planned widening of Talbert Avenue will alsn significantly reduce the impacts of increased traffic generation on that street. The only street in the area which exceeds design capacity is 'I Beach Boulevard. The Department of Public Works has indicated that a redesisignificant negative otion of eeffect an traffic of my study area to medium rf density surrounding local streets. Taylor Drive is not an issue in this amendment becOLIse there will be no streets constructed which directly connect it to the study area. The adjacent low density development fronting on Taylor is designed with its nwn private streets which do not join to the study area. 5. Environmental Issues a. Noise The portion of the study area adjacent to Talbert Avenue will be subjected to noise levels in excess of City standards for residential areas. Mitigation to reduce the Ldn 65 level to an acceptable level of 60 Ldn exterior and 45 Ldn interior will be necessary. b. Air Quality Both low and medium density residentia! developments would adversely effect air quality within the South Coast region. A low density residential use would generate less pollutants than the proposed medium density designc'-on - approximately .20 tons of emissions per day and 37 tons per day, respectively. The primary air emissions generated include carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, 30 i nitrogen oxides, particulates, arr; sulfur oxides from stationary and mobile sources. Automobile and truck traffic produce most of the pollutants with a small portion attributable to local heating. The following table summarizes the air emissions generated by the two land use alternatives: PROJECTED DAILY EMISSIONS Low Density Residential Emission Source Tons! of Emissians/GaS► Mobile .14 Stationary .06 Total W Medium Density Residential Mobile .28 Stationary .09 Total V The estimated tonnage of pollutants may be reduced as newer motor vehicles replace older models, new advances In engine design are implemented, or public transportation is expanded. 2.2.3 Staff Recommendation The amendment request is to change the area of concern from low to medium ' density residential. Althoogh PD zoning exists an the property, the low density �. residential land use designation has apparently offered little encouragement to consolidate land for adequate building sites. A medium density designation could provide an incentive to consolidate some of the existing fragmented j parcels and improve the feasibility of a comprehensive planned development. Medium density would also enhance the City's options in the provision of affordable housing to low and moderate income households. it offers an opportunity to provide such housing under an Inclusionary zoning ordinance with the utilization of density bonuses. Staff, therefore, recommends that the Beach-Talbert area be redesignated medium density residential. It is also recommended that PD zoning be included at the implementatin level to ensure adequate buffering with adjacent commercial and industrial uses to the east and west, and compatibility with the low density planned development to the south. 2.2.4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the 11.81 acre area of concern located south of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard be redesignated from low density residential to medium density residential. 31 2.3 Beach-Talbert Area B A third area of concern addressed by Land Use Element Amendment 80-1 is located north of Talbert Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard (Figure 2-8). The Amendment was requested by the Department of Development Services. 2.3.1 Background At its February S, 1980 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a zone change request from the Roman Cathciic Bishop of Orange to rezone approximately 4.1 acres from SP-1 (Special District Cemetery) to "Q" RA(Qualified Residential Agricultural). The purpose of the request was to construct a church. An additional 46.27 acres surrounding this site is presently vacant or in cemetery use, and under the some ownership. The property owner intends to use the vacant area as a future expansion of the existing cemetery. Zoning for this area is SP-1, but the Land Use Element currently designates the entire 50.37 acres(church and cemetery sites) as open space-. The existing cemetery occupies approximately 22 acres located at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue. The proposed church would cover another four acres on the north side of Talbert Avenue and 1540 feet east of Beoch Boulevard. The remaining 24 acres of vacant land for cemetery expansion abuts these existing and proposed uses to the northeast between Talbert Avenue and Newman Avenue. Adjacent commercial uses are located across Beach Boulevard to the west and at the southeast corner of Beach and Talbert Avenue. The Huntington Intercommunity Hospital and medical offices occupy 17 acres directly north of the cemetery. Medium density apartments and single-family residences adjoin the vacant portion of the site to the north across Newman Avenue. The study area abuts medium density condominiums and older single-family homes to the east. Single-family subdivisions and Crest View Elementary School are located to the south across Talbert A.venue. 2.3.2 Analysis The primary issue of this amendment request focuses on the open space land use designation. The staff report to the z:., change on the church site indicated that the Land Use Element was Inadvertently changed from public, quasi-pu511c, institutional to open space without public hearing in 1975-76. Further review of the record, however, shows that the change in land use designation was one of many made to the Land Use Element at the time of revision and adoption of the General Plan in December 1976. It was also found that the redesignation of the subject property to open space was intentional. 32 tar■r • r .�•°ara if/ratty. 2 FF Fii _~` r • .. %• . .. 7!J • Q •�r�/�■■rrrr•+wftArr.■w r • { ••�a �a�...�..i*r�.+ away■ ■ r an aaAr , r r af■ ••.aa•�..r;j aw■.•°/alawaw:wrwaar■rrr s ".... sw to rrw.•■u.r w w fwr•° . r jv ��..'�• wrraw.°■wr i a•r•err■ s� '::,: � r ra�f ■ r f /•rN■rrr • 's "•••.r 1 ■ ■ . .awa t r a°.r ■ w wr•a i •,��..,•• 2. ••••. j r.rrawa r .af/a at a �r■r • r�• r raw a ■Aaawr • rr.rfrwr r •t•r"■r ;!_ LJ+'."�.;i:'• f ew�r�w:wr a�/a�r�r■ •f��� �•• ■ 2 t=`s�:��;C3:•; 1+�f4`\��` j u rwr • w a o f�■ .L•t• t �� S fl w°Ar■A«li a°■ �• A fr/sir art • rr w 7 ■ • rr°■ i ■ r A •�■ w wr» 1�a . ,��,�yr as w • r r so ■ r f .1 ,` •\+�►`ju'' � au ;� /•A■j2r■f■■ra 8ER r� A y �M b� •iiiii:i� r w sit»rr, awry a°iaraaa�a as /r••rrr aaif°wr.rlaw■a ::i::: r ■ ■ / ■ .r•.a.a.•• •rr.. . • ■ ret� • • wr■x a r°/rw ::::::"•...•:ti:•..+.....•r.a.� r a°f//rr■r•■Mr■f ° a//r.f°/•/°f•r ."/ •: :: • / / / / / a ..••..•..aa...::..........r....:::::: ■ /gar w f ■ear r / w• • r a ■R • •...... ::::::i.......r.• ..a r...rrr.. r • •ra• / a w�/r i /laara A r!°• i:::::: a.a.aa...aii:•..........a ■ r / / r / • • ■ ■ f •..rrr. ' so ■ • f r • • / .....ar• aa... •a.... j r • / a f f r •...a...• a•.aaa. •.......• ..s..a. /J r • r • r r •aY.a........ ............ •+...ara..s.....+•.....r..s..��`.rr.. • • fir• • • •° :... :::::::: •� •••`••►... ••.••. • f i ° a i • .rrr..a...ra...........r.a... ..ar.a.•.......r....• `•••i::::::::: i• ■ • / •rrrr.r.a...a.........aa...r. •...•..•.....a.aa....r.r......... .rr. .r...•.r... •.•.. a.a.•..f.-.•..r.a1 a....••..•r. •••..-.. .+........ ` r•w° r i •�` • ..•..•.....•a.r..ar...a.►.r... tLf •..r..•..• ..a..a.... fro/ r ••.r.r....r..a......•...r.a.a• ':••••'...........aaa / • • / •..rrr....r..aa...•r.a.a....• • ar.rrr...r.a:::::s: a *• r • / ■ A ...r r.aa.aa.......... 6 ....a........r...a...• • r A r ° ••........ ... . •••..'..r...a.r.• •• i ::::::•.,.::::•. f�E SILK ... ... ::•:::•.. NTIAL E STATE C DMMERCIAL. = 2 un �9ac � GENERA PUBLIC USE 4 Lbw DENSITY � un/ L FiF�.FFtF AlE MM DE Sac OffiICE T'ROFF ,�.�,,:� l3PE1�! 51>Q�C' NSItY� 7un,��c 1 tVDU S`TR 1 SSIDNAL J fi'IGN �DEN91Tt'>Jsb�/oar w . . AL GEWH4e GENERAL PLAN Figure 2.-& Vol TALBERT - BEACH BLVD. AREA EA Q hu"tington ec ch Planning dlViS►or"I 33 ' 1 t-lowever, open space was not intended to accommodate related institutional uses such as churches, mortuaries, and religious schools. These uses require on size and residential or institutional land use designations, depending up locational criteria specified in the General Plan. Since the SP-1 classification can only be consistent with an open space land use, ancillary cemetery uses are severly limiter'. It is the staffs position that cemetaries not be classified as open space but rather as institutional. There are no policies or criteria in the General Plan to justify cemetaries as passive or active open space areas. Open space as defined by the Land Use and Open Space/Conservation Elements incorporates tion areas, resource preserves, neighborhood only scenic corridors, recrea production and planned open space development. parks, water areas, resource The Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix as depicted in Figure 4-1 of the General Plan document should, therefore, be revised to ranks 5P-I consistent with the public, quasi-public, institutional land use designation rather than open space. Designation of the study area as public:; quasi-public, institutional accommodates cemetery use, but also provides the opportunity to develop other institutional and public uses without encountering consistency problems. This could potentially intensify development and related issues of traffic congestion, environmental quality, and demand for public services and facilities. However, ultimate use of the property is expected to remain { dominated by the cemetery with the exception of the four-acre church site. Asa result, neither use individually or collectively is anticipated to significantly impact the issue areas identified above. The public, quasi-public, institutional designation within this low intensity scenario is also generally compatible with surrounding land uses. Other land use designations on the area of concern were rejected by staff for a number of reasons. The existing cemetery already occupies the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue, rendering a commercial designation inappropriate due to the lack of expo'�•'re to Bench Boulevard. Office-professional could be considered along Newman Avenue adjwth%-t to the hospital complex. Flowever, since there are over three acres of vacant land within the Huntington Intercommunity Hospital area and additional office space one-half mile to the south, the need for office-professional within the study area is marginal. Medium density residentic.i would provide additional housing opportunities to lower income families, and would be compatible with medium density developments directly to the east. Talbert and Newman Avenues could serve as logical boundaries and buffers to the single-family subdivisions to the north and south;but medium density would also add to traffic congestion on Newman Avenue near the hospital complex and increase the demand on public facilities in the general area. A low density residential designation would create a lower magnitude of impacts on public facilities and the traffic system, but would add little to the opportunity for housing for low and moderate income households. 34 1 2.3.3 Staff Recommendation The ultimate intended use of 46 acres within the area of concern is for cemetery and related facilities, while the remaining four acres comprise a proposed church site. Since cemeteries are also most appropriately classified as institutional uses, the study area should be redesignated from open space to public, quasi-public, institutional. In addition, the staff recommends that the 1 Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix as depicted in Figure 4-1 of the General Plan document be changed to show the SP-1 zoning district consistent with public, queri-public, institutional rather than open space. 2.3.4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that the 50.37 acre urea of concern located north of Tolbert Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard be redesignated from open space to public, quasi-public, institutional. The Commission also recommends that the Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix as depicted in Figure 4-1 of the General Plan document be changed to show the i SP-1 zoning district consistent with public, quasi-public, institutional rather j than open space. j I I i ; 35 ..... _ Ames� -- . � � �� - _ .� :� t 's�':�.Sll �. �L.i� �+ idt -tom -L. w - Ot • i( LAND USE CATEGORIES �N ¢�j �4c tip or cue onr � afr at to 1.1 ESTATE I ( ! l L2 LOW DENSITY f 1.3 MEDIUM CENSITY + t� `• 1A MIG4 DENSITY ' f 2.1 Gf Nf RA1 I 2.2WRCE PROFESSIONAL 2.3MIXED DEVELOPMENT k • t 3.0I".�AL`' 31GENERAL - l 4.1 PU6..QUAR-PUB-INSTIT_ 420PEN SPACE MPLANNED COMMUNITY ' - 5•2 PLANNING RESERVE ' d{RESOURLE PRODUCTIOld � r: "TWW • fi�e�Id oIBEACMr +00w► ZONING AND LAND USE B.f11 ENT �7 NM M MRwwrd YT stf�rnw 70 •� CONSISTENCY MATRIX VV 2.4 Environmental Changes In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act guidelines, an environmental assessment is required to address short-term and long-term effects, irreversible environmental changes, and growth inducing impacts of the total project or plan. This section analyzes these concerns in context of the recommended land use changes In Sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3. 2.4.1 Short-Term and Long-Term Productivity Amendment 80-1 seeks to identify short-range issues within a context of long-range goals, policies, and environmental planning programs. The amendment is in itself a mitigation measure designed to minimize any adverse effects on long-term productivity resulting from short-term uses. One of the steps required to implement the amendment is an analysis of the zone changes necessary to bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan. The zoning changes that would result would have significant short-term j effects, such as creating non-conforming uses, reducing or increasing intensity of development permitted, and providing stimulus for development. The long-term effects would include land uses which Implement General Plan i policies. 2.4.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes The Amendment will mitigate most adverse effects. However, irreversible environmental change of a secondary nature can be expected from development under the proposed amendment. Loss of open space will occur as vacant land is converted to other uses. Although the option to recycle the land to open space after development is available, it is probably not economically feasible. Alteration of topography will be an irreversible change. Although mitigating measures can be imposed as part of the development process, the natural topography will experience a negligible degree of modification. li Construction materials of mineral origin will also be needed for development to occur, and fossil fuels will be committed for long periods to satisfy local energy demand. However, such development would be consistent with existing lard use designations. 2.4.3 Growth Inducing Impacts The proposed amendment will also have. growth inducing effects within the areas of concern. An additional population of 134 persons could be generated by uses under Land Use Element Amendment 80-I9 thereby creating an Increased demand on public services and utilities and incrementally affecting air quality, water quality, traffic, and noise levels. However, the proposed uses in accord with General Plan policies and programs should mitigate many of the adverse effects generated by the expected growth. 37 i The major iss:e surrounding utility service to the Garfield-Goldenwest Area is how to provide such service without inducing growth that prematurely terminates nil production in the area. If residential development occurred in logical phases or in large projects in close proximity to existing utility lines, service could be provided as a normal extension at developer expense. However, given the variable phase out of oil operations and the fragmented ownership patterns, it is probable that many small projects will develop in as haphazard pattern without regard to the location of utility lines. The development of interior parcels first compounds the problem since utilities would have to be pulled in thereby c1 suchrowth on development5 thisoma>g the have constructed utility. Yet, short of prohibiting the least effect when confronted with the alternative of providing a one time comprehensive utility project through the use of capital improvement funds or an assessment district. On the contrary, requiring developers to pull in utilities perhaps through a reimbursement agreement could have the effect of discouraging growth until utilities are logically extended. The demand for water and energy will likely increase as a result of the proposed land uses in this amendment. Conservation measures can be Implemented to reduce these impacts. The following water conservation measures are recommended for the community at large and individual structures where appropriate. ., (1) Reduce evaporation from reservoirs by encouraging underground storage or coating water surfaces with evaporation hinderinj films or substances. (2) Encourage tertiary treatment of and reuse of the return flow of public water supplies wherever such use is acceptable and safe. (3) Discourage development in areas where air conditioning may be used frequently and for long periods. (4) Land use planning should be sensitive to the underground water level and not produce greater demand on the underground water supply than is available. (5) Waterspreading where appropriate should be encouraged in order to recharge the underground water supply. (6) Metering of water can stimulate more economical use and encourage repair of leaky connections. (7) Toilets and showers are commonly over-designed and use more water than necessary. Consumption can be reduced by introducing appropriate modifications to toilets and showers. 36 i I i I I ■ a The following energy conservation measures are recommended for I structures: (1) Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. i (2) Electric lights should be strategically placed to maximize efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimize much as possible. (3) Electrical heating in public and private structures should be discouraged. Solar-assisted heating systems should be encouraged. ;I 'I (4) Reflecting and/or insulating glass should be used In structures where windows are not shaded by exterior architectural projections or nature plants. �I I i t' , I 39 i 3.0 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS This section addresses a request by the Planning Division to add energy conservation policies to the Land Use Element. There is a growing awareness that energy conservation measures such as solar energy systems in homes and business establishments can reduce shelter costs through the savings derived from reduced energy consumption. The best way to promote energy conservation is to incorporate these measures into the regular planning and regulatory process which begins with the goals and policies presented in the City's General Plan. Additional regulatory measures will have to be adopted to fully realize energy conservation potentials in Huntington Beach. For these reasoro, the Planning Commission recommends that the Land Use Element be revs.,:d to incorporate the following .)olicies in Section 3.4.2.3, Natural Resources, page 75: (7) Promote design in development that will accommodate energy conservation features. (B) Promote a pattern of development within the City which would facilitate the establishment of mass transit systems. II � I 41 4.0 AMENDMENT SUMMARY The following table summarizes the proposed land use amendments addressed in Section 2.0 as recommended by the Planning Commission. 4.1 Summary of Proposed Land Use Element Amendment 80-I. PROPOSED LAND USE ACREAGE SUMMARY Land Use Existing Proposed Net Category Gross Acres Gross Acres Gross Acres RESIDENTIAL Low Density 11.81 0 -11.81 Medium Density 97.38 109.19 +11.81 OPEN SPACE 50.37 0 -50.37 PUP_LIC, QUASI-PUBLIC, INSTITUTIONAL 0 50.37 +50.37 Total land area involved in Amendment 80-I: 159.56 gross acres. NET PROJECTED POPULATION CHANGE Max. Units Residential Net Gross Per Total Population Types Acres Gross Acre Units _Per Unit Population Low Density -11.81 7 82 3.44 -282 Medium Density +I 1.81 IS 177 2.35 +-4�16+ 43 APPENDICES lop I� i r � APPENDIX A j FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS GARFiELD - GOLDENWEST AREA ' In cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc. the computerized fiscal impact methodology (see: Final Report on the Development and Application of a Land Use Fiscal Impact Met Bolo for the it of Huntington Beac Volume , Met olo evelo ment Nove er 1, 9 was used to evaluate the three proposed land use alternatives as part of Land Use Element Amendment 80-1 for the Garfield-Goldenwest Area. For analysis purposes, the 10-year period from July 1, 1980 through June 30, 1990 was selected, representing fiscal years 1981 through 1990. It was assumed that existing developments and projects under construction would remain in the study area throughout the 10-year period. The analysis incorporates these uses as given, and focuses on the probable development of vacant parcels and the recycling of oil production areas. For new residential development it was assumed that the majority of uses would be condominium planned developments similar to the project now under construction by the Mola Development Company south of Garfield Avenue and east of the railroad right-ref-way. Medium density apartments were designated for the smallest parcels where planned developments appeared less probable. New industrial developments were assumed to be a mix of light manufacturing and commercial services with a large number of businesses per structure (less than 8000 square feet of building space per tenant). This industrial mix was based upon typical new developments in the Central Industrial Corridor (i.e., the northwest corner of Nichols and Slater). Typical uses would include metal fabricators, electronic equipment manufacturers, machine shops, welding shops, engineering services, building contractors, automobile parts sales, statuary Shops, furniture shops and sales, photographic services, and wdio-visual services. Table I shows that, over the 10•year period chosen,-all three proposed alternatives have a deficit ranging from $0.75 million for the industrial alternative to $0.42 million for the residential alternative on the basis of today's dollars versus.a deficit of $1.65 million for the industrial alternative to $1.04 million for the residential alternative an a cash flow basis.l Tables 2-4 present the corresponding annual revenue and cost comparisons. It should be noted that the residential alternative generates the highest expenditure over the 10-year period but tends to produce substantially rr:ore revenue than the industrial alterrntive. It was found that sales tax and business license fees provide the bulk of revenues from Industrial uses. Sales tax from industrial was approximately two times that generated by the assumed residential developments ($1.29 million for industrial versus $0.67 million for residential on a cash flow basis). However, property tax revenues from the residential uses were much higher than those generated by Industrial uses ($1.09 million for residential versus $0.38 million for industrial on a cash flow basis). The valuation of residential arcs industrial properties was derived from comparable recent developments in the City. In addition to property taxes, residential uses showed a comparative advantage from other revenue sources such as permit and } processing fees, fines, and revenue from other agencies(gasoline taxes and motor vehicle in-lieu fees). I I oday's dollar inx!icates the present value of future costs and revenues discounting , inflationary changes over time; whereas, cash flow refers to valuing costs and revenues by accounting for inflationary changes over time. i 4 APPENDIX A Although the deficits produced by all three alternatives may run counter to traditional conception of land use revenues, they can be explained for the most part by the repercussions of Proposition 13. The effect of Proposition 13 was to reduce property taxes by 60 percent in the initial year of existing developments, and to assess at one percent of full market value all existing and future developments. Property tax increases were further limited to a maximum of two percent annually. Without these limitations, the three alternatives would have generated substantially more total revenues and offset much of the projected deficits. This was verified by applying the computerized fiscal impact methodology to pre-Proposition 13 conditions. There are a number of qualifications regarding the deficit results of the analysis which should be noted. First, the study analyzed only direct fisca! impacts on general fund revenues and expenditures. There was no attempt to predict the continuing impact of State bail-out funds, other revenue transfers, and the development of new revenue sources. Secondly, the effects of the Gann Initiative were applied to projected expenditures based upon consumer price index increases. However, until the Issues surrounding the implementation of Gann are resolved and a specific formula developed, expenditure projections may or may not reflect the true fiscal picture over the long-term. A third consideration is that the fiscal impact model is less successful at predicting secondary fiscal impacts from the growth which could be generated by the proposed land uses. It should be pointed out that all other known fiscal impact methodologies have the some problem. Finally, future increases in the assumed housing values and changes in the industrial uses to those which are more sales tax-oriented could dramatically alter these projections. �I AM& I �. APPENDIX 1 TABLE 1 10-YEAR SUMMARY COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES FOR THE GARFIELD AVENUE -- GOLDEN WEST STREET GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Proposed Alternative Cash Flow Basis Industrial Residential Mixed Revenue (1)+ (2) 2,694.3 3,586.6 2,908.4 Cost (1) 4,348.9 4,629.2 4,422.7 Revenue-Cost (1) - 1,654.6 - 1,042.6 - 1,514.3 Revenue/Cost 0.62 0.78 0.66 In Today' Dollars (3) Revenue (1)7(2) 19532.9 2,013.3 1,658.7 Cost (1) 2,288.8 2,440.2 2,344.5 Revenue-Cost (1) - 755.9 - 426.9 - 685.8 Revenue/Cost 0.67 0.83 0.71 i i 1 (1) in $1,000 t (2) Includes permit and processing fees plus library fees, but excludes parks, sewer and drainage fees (3) Current year dollars discounted at 10% i TABLE 2 ANYIJAL REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON FOR THE PROPOSBD INDOS TRIAL ALTERNATIVE i 1 Cash Flow Toda 's Dollars** Revenue Revenue Fiscal rear Minus -To-Cast Revenue Revenue Revenue- Cost* Cost* Minus Revenue*- Cost* Cos* -To-Cost I960-I981 176 Ratio 126.7 49.7 1.39 165.4 t- .3 I74.2 115.2 50.2 l.f.4 198l-2982 2.1 1.01 145.7 I43.9 1982-1983 �3.I 214.6 I.8 l.d1 -31.5 0.85 137.6 Ibi.3 1983-1984 217.2 272.9 -23.7 0.85 -55.7 0.80 148.4 186.4 -38.0 1984-I985 237.5 345.7 -108.2 a.80 1485-I986 0.69 147.5 214.6 -67.1 278.0 436.4 -158.4 0.64 � O,b4 i56.4 1986-191' 309.9 24b.3 -89.4 O.G4 538.5 228.6 0.58 159.0 276.3 -117.3 1987-' 343.7 647.4 -303.7 0.58 -' 198`' ,89 374.0 746.9 0.53 1��';s 3d2.0 -141.7 0.53 a -372.9 0.50 158.6 316.8 1' -1990 3;�.2 845.E -158.2 0.50 -447.4 0.47 153.5 326.0 -172.5 4,47 TOTAL 2,694.3 4,348.9 -I,654.6 0.62 1,532.9 2,288.8 -755.9 0.67 a * In $I,000 I Current year dollars discounted at 10% i i t . TABLE 3 A.NN41 AL REVENUE AND COST COMPARISON FOR TKE PROPO4_ED RESIDENTIAL ALTERNATIVE Cash ply Toda '$ Dollars** 'Fiscal Yea- Yea RevQaue* Minus Revenue Cost* -To-cost Revenue Revenue • 14A ., -----_.., Ratio 192.8 11$ 0 -- nu Mites -TO-Cost Rev 14b! --------- Cast* I931-1982 74.8 ;.53 Cost*_ Ratio 256. ► 172.E 179.9 1V 2I0.2 251.5 1982-1983 211.9 83.8 1.49 72.6 1.68 1983-1984 3 -41.3 0.84 0.92 142.E 69.3 1.49 01.2 329.4 _28.2 157.9 189.0 19844-!985 322.2 -31.1 387.2 `05.7 225.0 0.84 I985-I986 -65.0-12 0.83 -19.3 0.92 3 348.8 471.0 200.1 240.4 1986-1987 2,2 0.74 -40.3 96.9 554.E 46.9 0.83 255.sIc 1987-1988 -157.7 0. �0.12 -59.0 ' Ic 468.4 637.8 203.7 284.Erc 1988-1989 -169.4 0.73 50 -80.9 d 7.9 769.2 218.5 297.6 4.?2 581.8 937.9 214.4 326.2 I989-I990 -261.3 0.66 -79.I 0.?3 a -356.1 0.62 -111.8 224.3 0.66 361.6 0.6 TOTAL 31586.6 4,629.2 -1,042.6 0.78 2,013.3 2,44a,2 -426.9 r 0.83 * In $1,000 '� Current year dollars discounted at 10Z 1 TABLE 4 AHWA1. REVENUE AND COST COHPARISOtI ?OR THE PROPOSED MIRED INDUSTRIAL AM RSSIDMI:AL ALTERNATIVE t I i Cash Flow j Todav`s DolLars** Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Hines -To-Cost Fiscal Year Rev minus -To-Coat s Cast* Cost* Ratio. Revenue* Cost* Cost* Ratio 1980-1981 199. -'+ 6 126.7 72.9 1.58 186.4 115.2 71.2 1.62 1981-1982 179.9 188.0 - 8.1 0.96 148.7 155.4 - 6.7 0.96 1982-•1983 208.8 241.3 - 32.5 0.87 156.9 181.3 - 24.4 0.87 1983-1984 244.5 297.8 53.0 0.82 167.2 203.4 - 36.2 0.82 1984-1985 260.4 365.5 -105.1 0.71 161.7 227.0 - 65.3 0.71 1985-1986 294.5 442.8 -148.3 0.67 166.2 250.0 - 83.8 0.67 1986-1987 315.1 536.0 -220.9 0.59 161.7 275.0 -113.3 C.59 1987-1988 367.6 633.0 -265.4 0.58 171.5 295.3 -123.8 0.58 > 1988-!389 400.4 732.8 -332.4 0.55 169.8 310.8 -141.0 0.55 1989-1990 437.3 858.8 -421.5 0.51 168.6 331.1 -162.5 0.51 TOTAL 2,908.4 41422.7 -11514.3 0.66 1,658.7 29344.5 -685.8 0.71 I i * In $3,00Q E ** Current year dollars discounted at 10% I i 2,r SEWER GARF ELD-._QOLDgNWEST AREA f � 1 � 1 3l �r 2� OL so } I � r1 � +•i� � jjs � i� ,... .. .. su e. 1J�°i 1A O let Li t i f i f 1 j i t 1 M MyM MWdON WON rAftdW49WdM ASr---*4vV-mii10 ' W z W 0 / Q � � W Uft 1 49 � L:::Jl L 1 SIMN30vto R WTURRddv ' _ �:•-fir•r /:j: �I APPENDIX D l . i I `'t�l•i� • • 1 I �111 i �1`_�J• • % i i �; � ll j� % L J, { 1 -..r r 1 d� •1 I� �..., � J I,!�.LI ram'; ', CF-C CF-E 1 i .8F i _ D r / . 30 . • J+ � �/,• - psi • ..� 1 i• CF-C•- I I• (- _ ELI Lo 1. - -1 ! /�.. 0^��.G��� f i 11 • r1f-7 IY"�`y.''7/r'�y)•�0.��M: 1�"`.. OLD TOWN DnAINAGE DISTRICT GARFIELD•GOLDENWEST AREA i t a (8•): PROPOSED €MSUNG WATER E GARFIELQ,;,QOLDENWES AREA ■ ,�_..r._ 12 6 12 1 I I IL r TA �P a• a-y ''\ -N- b"t8 U � C3 W ' ya • ~ 1 4 , M WATER 4r � g1'ORAC� j t ram" ra ! AT AJE 1 AVE r�or1>rsarslrr•mr+� .• . _ 1" 1 � . RC%ALD E. S � '�'�ri''�I :1 11• .;rl �• 1+ :i ty -�!:'Z-;rE-, �L � 4 1u Q ca rr � .+ i• II •��111 1'' •'I • t �. fi (n T• r r �) tJ i �1 1af li II' '11+ !• •1111 11 ' A En �_._J � � 1 yam'" j f 1 i.. �' j:..• � .t�.�T���. t•-t aZ t+1 ! I 1 1 1 .1. I`_ t ' ..._17. t 1••I L •.{• ! 1 !. ! t• ..tea I J Ln�i Cl H 'a w°• v TALBERT AVE r t c w CITY OF HUNTINGTON BLEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION m�aticnrr ir�cii Chuck Clark James R. Barnes*I�� To From Associate Planner Associate Planner Subject GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 80-3. Date November 14, 1979 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION As_ wasdiscussed in our meeting with June earlier this week, I feel that.the most comprehensive and concise method of meeting CEQA requirements in regard to GPA 80-1 is to pro-ass the general plan document as an EIR. Section 15148 of the State EIR Guidelines states that "The require- ments for an EIR on a local general, plan element or amendment thereof will be satisfied by the general plan or element document and no separate' EIR will be required if: 1) The general plan addresses all the points required to be in an EIR by Article 9 of the State EIR Guidelines, and 2) The document contains a special section or a cover sheet identifying where the general plan document addresses each of the points required. " Attached is an initial study which focuses on potentially significant environmental effects of the general plan amendment proposal. Effects dismissed in the initial study as clearly insignificant and unlikely to occur need not be discussed further in the EIR. A cover letter should be included in the general plan document indi- cating where in the document the environmental setting and impacts associated with areas identified in the initial study are addressed. A separate section of the document should also be included discussing the following mandatory elements of an EIR: 1) Any significant envir- onmental effects which cannot be avoided if the proposal is implemented; 2) Mitigation measures proposed to miniwize the significant effects; 3) Alternatives to the proposed action; 4) The relationship between local short-term uses of man'R environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long-term productivity; 5) Any significant environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented; 6) The growth-inducing impact of the proposed action. JRB:df Attachment 1r � FNVIRONMENTAl. CHECYLIST FORM I. Backprovnd Industrial Property Owners-GarfieUVGolderwest area Woodtree Development Co. - Talbert/Beach area 1. Name of Proponent DeVelOPMnt Svc. Dept. - Circulation Element Amendment 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 3. Date of Checklist Submission -�-- --r-"--ry 4. Agency Requiring Checklist it Services Departitwt 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable G_.tx3ral Plan Amendment 80-1 II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geolnpic substructures? _ ^X b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Chanpe in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water 'erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or laV:e? X • 1 %tow YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- ' quakes, landslides, mudslides, -round failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deteri- oration of ambient air quality? X b. Zhe creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in �. climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X ' c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? X ?1 d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X r e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X i f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X l g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- Lions or withdrawals, or through .. interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Fx posure of people or property to ! water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X +1 YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Chanre in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier 1 to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: i a. Change in the diversity of species, or- numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic orgAnismo, or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of ani- mals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or ` wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: { a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? i 7. Lipht and Clare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X i . r YFS NAYIIE Ne 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. Population. will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X ` 12. Housin . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 1 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in.: � a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, ' or demand for new parking? ' c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movzment of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or ;. air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazardous to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Rovernmentai service* in any of the following areas: X 4 Y 1 �i YES MAYBE NO a. Fire protection? X b. Police ptotection?' X c. Schools? X d. Parka or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Enerly. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial smounta of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X i b. Communications systems? X c. Water? d. Sever or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? . X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental Health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? '8. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X i i I I i •• 'v YES MAYBE W) 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an mpact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Archeologicafhlistorical. Will th4• proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X 21, Mandatory Finding• of Significance. a. Poea the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or' wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve abort•-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A i' short-term impact on the environment is 1 one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which X ter• are individually limited, but cumu— latively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Dcas the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? � III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation. IV. Determination ' (To be completed by the Lead Agency) S001 '• } ti r. on the basis of this initial evaluation; [-1 I find that the proposed project COULD NrT have a significant effect cn the environment , and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in i this case because the mitigation measureb described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMEPTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date pnature j dr I 1 1 1 I i ` '*✓ III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRUMMAL EVAUMICN 1. b,c Execution of soils associated with projects which will eventually result from the General Plan Amendment will alter Mdsting tropoclraphy within the project areas. nSowever, the impacts at this point are too speculative for evaluation. 2. b Deve1 pnent resulting from the Tal.bert/i .ch and Garfield/doldenwest land use changes may adversely effect ambient air quality. N-wvert there will be little or no effect in .relation to development allowable under existing zoning on the property. The circulation Element changes could have beneficial inpacts on existing air quality. 3.b The existing drainage patterns in the Talbert7/Beerch and Garfield/Goldenwest tweas could be d=ged as a result of eventual development or. the subject sites. Ha"ver, the inpact:s at this point are taco speculative for evaluation. 6. a Noise levels associated with projects which will eventually result from the General Plan Arrerdment will increase. of particular eonoern are noise levels resulting from a fixed rail or rapid transit system along the Transportation Corridor. 7. New light and glare associated with projects which will eventually result for the General Plan Amendment will be provided. However, the impacts at this point are too speculative for evaluation. 8. Present land use designation would be altered with thin proposal. ZY)a impacts should be discussed. 11. The local population distribution and location will be altered by the General Plan Amendment. ;"he .impacts should be discussed. 12. The City's housing supply will be effected by the General Plan Amendment. Zhe impacts should be discussed. f ' 13 a,b TYaffic levels associated with development which will eventually result from the General Plan Amendme-nt in the Talbert/Beach and Garfield/Goldenwest areas will increase. The impacts should be discussed. 13 c,d The cropos r., amendments to the Circulation Element will alter City wide patterns ., circulation. The impacts should be discussed. 19 a-e The Talbert/Seach and Garfield/Goldenwest land use changes may result in the nuwci for increased governr,.mtal services. The impacts should be di 16 a-f Th 'ralbert/Beach and Garfield/Goldenaest land use changes may result in alterations to utility systems. The impacts s1vuld be discussed. I 19 The Tal.bertMeach and Garfield/Goldwest land use changes nay result in an impact on the r;,:ality or quasnity of existing recreational opportunities. the 1g3acts should be discussed. 1 t . 1. ♦ • - - .. ._ . . ..- ...-. .• � ...'JET• .:A-. .• i E IR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES I t Stab oil California THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA Memorandum To : Jim Burns, Assistant Secretary Date : January 31, 1960 Resources Agency James R. Barnes, Associate Planner Subject: DEIR - Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach General Plan Amendment 80-1 P. 0. Box 190 SCH 80011003 Huntington Beach, California 92648 From : Department of Conservation---Division of Oil and Gas 8+iseraanf+ The Division of Oil and Gas has reviewed the Draft EIR for the Land Use Element 80-1 to the Huntington Beach General Plan. 'The following comment is offered for your consideration. The report states on page 12 that almost 60 percent of the area is still vacant or in oil production, which is expected to phase out over the next 10 to 15 years. Alternative 1 indicates that the area may be designated as Medium Density Residential. This designa- tion, if adopted, could effect continued oil production and access to wells for maintenance and abandonment. In that regard, the Long Beach staff of the CDOG has recently consulted with Mr. Multari of the Huntington Beach Planning Division and offered their assistance in providing technical advice on oil resources in the area and delineation of sites critical to future oil extraction. We look forward to working with the city staff on this important issue. t• . ( f State Oil a as Supervisor APPROVED: uzanne Butter el Environmental Protection Coordinator Office of the Director I i CITY OF HIUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUIriMVGTCY�l4CH To Chuck Clark From Environmental Resources Associate Planner Section Subject Negative Declaration No. 80.-16 Date February 28, 1980 (LUE 80-1) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: Redesignate 50.37 acres on the Land Use Element from open space to Institutional Location: North of Talbert, east of Beach. Background f Based on the Staff' s initial study if this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the ^� Office of the City Clerk for a 10-.day public review period ending � February 25, 1980 and X no comments, the attached comments were received. `I Recommendation I The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission and City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 80-16 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect o:: the environment. � Respectfully submitted, t . A4mes R. Barnes seciate Planner JRH:gc WNW ' s ' CITY of HUNTINGTON BE..,, vow DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.0.Box 190 Huntington Beech,CA.92648 ru.ru.r,trn n u n Tel: 17141536.5271 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $75:00 FOR CITY USE ONLY City of Huntington Bead. Date Aryl cant Author zed Agent Received: Project Nb 9-0- (to Number: -Nry OW1657 P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Department of Origin: Maillno Address Development Services 714-536-•5550 _ Other Applications or Telepfione Permit Numbers : LUE 80-1 Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange Property [honer 3420 Irvine Ave. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 Mailing Address Telephone 1. 0 Project Information (please attach 'Plot Plan and submit photographs of subject property) 1.1 Nature of Project- Give complete description of the proposed project- � ~ - Land Use Element 80-1 Area 2.3 Proposed redesignation from open space to public, quasi-•public, institutional on 50.37 acres. 1.2 Location of Project: (Address, nearest street intersections) North of Talbert Avenue, east of Beach Boulevard 1.3 Assessor's Parcel Number: 167-601-8,9,10,11,12 i I -1_ SP-1 i 1.4 IVhat is the present zoning on the property? 1.5 What is the surrounding land use to the: i Resi� North Hospital, Medical Offices, Medium Density Apaxtm^nts, Single Family dential South Cenral CaM e= al, Elements .9CbM1, Sind C:E= y Reg14 ent4a1 East Medium Density Condominiums west General Cann=ial, 1.6 If the project is corranercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to estimated employment per shift and.any potential hazardous materials which may be used, etc. NA 1.7 If the project is residential, indicate number, types and size of units and associated facilities. NA 1. 8 If the 3 ro•ect is institutional, indicate the major function, P estimated employment per shift and maximum occupancy. Cemetary on 24 acres. Proposed church on 4 acres. The rtwaining 22 acres are vacant. The proposed church will accamndate religious services on c,►eekeo s and holy days. Pernwmt staff of 6 priests (currLntly in resi- deice). Maxim4m occupancy is y0J persms. 1.9 Project land area (acres) 50.37 Number of parking spaces NA . :9 Square feet of building area NANunber of floors NA 1.11 Height of tallest structure involved in the project NA 2.0 Environmental Setting 2. 1 Drainage and Flood Control a) Please describe how on-site drainage will be accommodated. Volume unknown. Drainage to Talbert Avenue and Newman Avenue an3 then to Beach Boulevard. -2- �2.2 Land form a) Is the site presently graded? NO b) Indicate the gross cubic yards of grading proposed NA the acres of land to be graded NA the amount o earth to be transported on the site NA , Nand the amount of earth to be transported off the s to c) What: will be the maximum height and grade of cut or fiil after grading is completed? NA 2.3 Soils a) Type of soils on the subject site? (Submit soils report; if available) . Rmrs m clay 14,3m RArona 103m 2.4 Vegetation a) Attach a map indicating the location, type and size of ' trees located on the site. Indicate below the number, type and size of trees to be removed as a result of the project. Photographs indicate the growth of shrubs and trees on the cemetary site; and grass and shrubs scattered throughout the vacant area. i 2.5 Water Quality . c a) Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches, } estuaries, bays, tidelands, or inland water areas? NO b) Describe how the project': will effect any body of water. NA + 2. 6 Air Ouality a) If the project is industrial, describe and list air pollution sources and quantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. NA 2.7 Noise a) Describe any adjacent off-site noise sources (i.e. , air- . ports, industry, freeways) . Normal Traffic. b) What noise will be produced by the project? If available, I please give noise levels in decible measurement and typical time distribution when noise will be produced. t':o appreciable noise except normal traffic associated with the Ceretar1, proposed church, and future insti.'aational or office uses. • 4� --3-- c. flow will noise produced by the project compare with existing noise levels? w appreciable difference. 2.8 Traffic , Approximately how much traffic will be generated by the project: (check one) i 0-50 vehicular trips per day 50 - 250 vehicular trips per day 250 - 500 vehicular trips per day X over 500 vehicular trips per day ; 3.0 Public Services and Facilities 3. 1 Water a) Will the project require installation or replacement of new water lines? Yes b) Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project. 1200 gals./day . I 3.2 Sewer a) Will the project require installation or replacement of new sewer lines? Yes b) Please indicate the approximate amount of sewage generated from the project. 1000 gals./clay 3. 3 Solid Waste a) If the project is industrial, describe the type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. NA i 4 .0 Social, 4.1. Population Displacement t a) Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project activities? No b) Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to ' be demolished by the project. i s None -q- I u 5.0 Mitigatinq Measures 5. 1 Are there measures included in the project which may conserve nonrenewable resources (e.g. electricity, gas, water-) ? Please describe. No 5.2 Are there measures included in the project which would protect or enhance flora and fauna? Please describe. New landscaping as development occurs. 5.3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution? Please describe. No noise produced. 5. 4 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project (e.g. architectural treatment and landscaping) which have been coordinated with design of the existing community to minimize visual effect? Please describe. LwId-91--aPing with Eucalyptus to be added as new develogrnnt occurs. 5.5 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce water pollution? Please describe. No 5.6 Are t.iere measures proposed which would reduce air pollution? No *gist any Air Pollution Control District equipment required. NA i 5. 7 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resource recovery and/or energy conservation (e.g. solar heating, special insulation, etc. )? Please describe. No 6.0 Alternatives 6. 1 Are there alternatives to the project which may result in a les3er adverse environmental effect? please explain all project alternatives on an attached sheet. No. Refer to wwrbrnnt analysis. ' I hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowl.edge. 1 Signature Date Filed 5-- � /e..w v.:. .. .a..•.i'..... '.-. .. .. ._.. y 1 -. .... .. .. ..._ .... ...... .. ........... ... ..... a .. .N, tnr.•.r... .r. r.a;ry sc.+l e t� 0 MC) � t j. 1 huntington leach planning department r , .......... ABSTRACT The objective of this report is to survey and analy-Ze industrial land use in the City of Huntington Beach to provide an understand- ing of current conditions and potentials for future Lxpansion. A Toward this end, the study examines the City's existing industrial uses, employment structure, and revenues/expenditures generated by industrial uses; analyzes regional economic growth and the City' s future land requirements; provides a suitability study of vacant sites for industrial development; and explores Future courses of action affecting the City's industrial land inventory. � R {{ The data collected reveals that about 2, 000 acres are general planned or zoned for industry in Huntington Beach, one-half of which is still vacant. Small light industrial and wholesale trade establishments dominate the developed areas. However, warehousing, storage, wrecking yards, and junk yards constitute an important A share of acreage in some places, most notably along the Central Industrial Corridor. The largest firms in the City are concentrated In aerospace, public utilities, and the oil industry. The study suggests that the City is not maximizing benefits from its industrial land. Existing light. industrial development was . 014 found to have a positive effect on local school revenues but a negative effect on the City's financial balance. While the City shows a net revenue gain from developments in the Huntington Industrial Park Area, it exhibits a substantial net loss from activities along the Central Industrial Corridor. This reflects the high proportion of marginr4l uses with minimun improvement in 04 the Gothard corridor. Moreover, such industries do not generate significant employment ani income multiplier ecfectp to other } sectors of the local economy. n In relative growth terms, the City can be expected to maintain a 5.5 to 6 percent share of Orange County's industrial base through ! «� the year 2000. By the turn of the century, the City will require approximately 677 acres above the area currently developed to accommodate expected industrial growth. This leaves about 339 acres in excess capacity. If Huntington Beach is to capture the projected share of future industrial growth, however, the City (and other promotional organizations) will have to continue or 0 expand present industrial encouragement efforts. Not every acre in the vacant industrial land inventory is highly suited to industrial development. Only 66 percent of the vacant space surveyed received a high rating for potential expansion. About 75 percent of the best sites are located in the Huntington 0 Industrial Park Arai", while most of the rest a::e interspersed along the Gothard corridor. Past land policy favored retaining i Ci i the Central Industrial Corridor. However, it has not sufficiently protected good quality rites from residential encroachment, or invasion from marginal business structures, storage facilities, r, and wrecking yards. Much of the corridor's land is poor, subject to flooding, inaccessible, or otherwise undesirable. The impor- tance of rail service and the Route 39 Freeway to the corridor has diminished, leaving a multitude of mediocre sites for future industry. At the same time, not enough prime land was allocated for future industry in the Huntington Industrial Park Area. Since r- the available land around the industrial park area is now entirely in residential development, the City is confronted with the alterna- tive of improving the attractiveness of the Central Industrial Corridor. Based on the research and analysis presented in this report, the Planning Department recommends the following: I 1. The City a►td other promotional groups should continue ex-- sting measures to expand industry in the Huntington Industrial Park Area. ; 2. if it is desired to increase Huntington Beach's share of future County growth beyond that projected, the City should become actively involved in upgrading the potential of the Central. Industrial Corridor and expanding the need for sites now considered excess capacity. The following measureb are suggested: !^ A. The City should encourage the development of small indus- trial parks, and prohibit the proliferation of marginal activities that demonstrate little economic benefit. A. The City should provide more flexibility in the industrial zone by permitting mixed use developments. C. The City should implement measures to upgrade the suita- bility of sites. These might include encouraging sufficient consolidation of parcels; precise planning of streets to inaccessible parcels; and increasing the priority of industrial areas on the Capital Improvements Program for utilities, drainage, and streets. D. The City should work closely with Southern Pacific Railroad to enhance the potential of rail-oriented properties. E. The City should pursue measures that will hold sites for long-term development. These could include either helping to organize ventures that purchase the land for long-term use or permitting low intensity interim uses. 3. If measures do not sufficiently increase the potential of sites in the Gothard corridor, a portion of the excess land capacity ii , should be reduced according to a prioritized list of general areas and individual site evaluations. 4. The Edison Area should be phased out of the industrial land use inventory. I , Y� I 1 l } i i I 1 ' v n TABLE OF CONTENTS ++� SLCTION TITLE PAGE i � ABSTRACT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Intent and Purpose I 1.2 Methodology 2 1.2.1 Industrial Land Use and Employment Density 2 1.2.2 Futuri Employment and Land Use 2 Requirements 1.2.3 Vacant Land Use Suitability 3 i � f { 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS 5 2. 1 Established Tndustrial Development Policies 6 2.2 Existing Uses on Industrial Designated Land 6 2.2.1 :general Planned and Zoned Industrial Land 6 2.2.2 Existing Industrial Uses and Pending 7 i Projects 4.3 industrial. Employment 14 f � 2.4 Revenues and Expenditures Generated by 17 I Industrial Uses ' 3.0 FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 21 .� 3.1 Regional Perspective 21 3. 1. 1 Existing Areawide Industrial Density 21 3.1. 2 Regional Employment Projections 23 3. 1. 3 Area Planned for Future Industrial 23 Development ! " 3.2 Industrial Potential in Huntington Beach 25 3.2. 1 Future Land Requirements 25 3.2.2 Suitability of Undeveloped Industrial 26 Sites 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM!•;�NDATIONS 31 4.1 Past Land Policy 31 4.2 Industrial Uses and Municipal Revenues 32 .D 4.3 Industrial Growth 32 Aft I SECTION TITLE PAGE 4 .4 Land Requirements and Suitability of ?2 Vacant Land 4. 5 Huntington Industrial Park Area 34 4. 6 Central Industrial Corridor 34 4.7 Edison Area 36 n r ' I ' i i O a i TABLE OF FIGURES • NUMBER TITLE PAGE 2-1 General Plan Industrial Land 8 2-2 Existing Industrial Zoning 10 2-3 Existing Industrial Uses 12 2-4 Industrial Firms and Employment 15 within Huntington Beach 2-5 Employment by Standard Industrial Code 16 Classification 0 2-6 Summary of Annual City and School Revenues 18 and Expenditures per acre of Industrial Land 3-7 Regional Employment Projections 24 3-8 Suitability of Vacant Land for Industrial 28 * Development O ' I II:1T ... . •„ ,i•.,'� f. ♦.. .. .. - . ...... ....w• .,.... a... .....i..:f'.-•17'SnT Y.t`:►If i1Pt.'S(7'CC::Y1' an 1 '1 001 i. 04 I I r1 I^11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Intent and purpose .4 This report presents an inventory and analysis of industrial land within the City of Huntington Beach. It is anticipated that such a study will afford the City' s decision--makers an understanding of existing industrial conditions and potentials for expansion so that further action on industrial land use can be undertaken with recognition of its implications. H For the past several years pressures have increased to rezone industrial property to other uses along the Gothard--Southern Pacific corridor. Discretionary bodies, however, have been reluctant to allow such changes because of the desire to expand the City' s economic base and increase municipal revenues through «� industrial development. This study emerged from a request of the City Council and Planning Commission to conduct a systematic analysis of industrial land in order to ascertain present- and future needs. The scope of the study was expanded to include all industrially designated land in the City. The existing industrial inventory and land suitability &nalynis were completed in early 1976. To adequately estimate future land needs in the City, however, the report was again expanded to its present form to l i I i include a regional perspective. 1.2 Methodology I The study proceeds from an inventory of existing industrial con- ditions within Iuntington Beach to a regional analysis of industrial development and employment in the Y_est of Orange County. Future land requirements for the City are then estimated through the year 2000 by projecting employmP;it in the industrial sector and applying a density factor to the available vacant industrial lan r Land needs are then matched against the suitability of vacant d. sites for development. l•2.1 Industrial Land Use and Employment Density In order to determine the amount of available industrial land in the City, a parcel was classified "industrial" i.f it is zoned and/or general planned for such use. Industrial land as defined is then organized by geographic area in the City and by five general categories of use; general industrial development, related uses, non-conforming uses, andlic vac utility, oil The category of general industrial d�avelopmentant is•subdivid into aerospace: other manufacturing and wholesale traded and warehouse and storage. The City,s employment applicable to future land requirements is derived fromian average of densities in the three ' ial development subcategories. This localrfactor uisrthen weighted 25 percent by the average industrial densit in Orange County as a wholf. y 1.2.2 Future Employment and Land Use Requirements The City's future industrial em to pre- dicted from the SCAG-76 Growth Forecast Po].ich. isTheSCAG report includes emp oyment pro ect ons or Orange County and Fegional Statistical Area 38 (consists Beach, kist-minster, Fountain Valley, and Seal Beach) gton through the year 2000. The projections consider the demand and supply sides of economic also significant to the extent that thewth allocatioonaof total employment to Orange County and RSA 38 is treated In a context of competition with all other counties in the SCAG region.1 Total employment within RSA 38 is allocated to Huntington Beach and the three other cities according to local City Population growth projections and SCAG s em to P j � P yment/ 1Refer to ,St;AG-76 Growth Forecast Po1ic for a c of methodo ogy an ass►vapt ons. complete discussion � i . 1 ; n ti i Population ratios to the year 2000. Grow yr; the industrial sector are derived from Growth Projections ~` em 1��+ om average 1970-1976 p yment/industrial employment ratios. Future land requirements are then estimated by application of the in- dustrial density factor to the projected industrial employment. q 1.2.3 Vacant Land Use Suitability Potential industrial sites are evaluated according to the following criteria: I. Accessibility to transportation (rail and vehicular) 2. Fire protection rating j � 3. Compatibility with surrounding land uses 4• Accessibility to Public utilities 5. Suit abil ty of physical features (soil, topography, dra^ 6. size and shape of parcel: degree of ownership ' ( consolidation 7• Required site work (grading and structure removal) The study evaluates the vacant parcels to three ranges of suitability for industrial development: high, medium, and low. Land with non-conforming uses is also analyzed. The evaluation criteria and scoring system a in sample form in the appendix of this study. Datarsheets for specific parcels are available through the Planning Department. The evaluation criteria reflect a certain degree of bass. Vacant parcels are analyzed according to locational advantages suitable to small to medium scale light industrial developments such as those found in the Huntington Beach Industrial, Park. The study is less Cot oriented to those firms that find advantage at rail locations or on physically marginal land. g ome are also applicable to non-industrial developmenrriteria However, such criteriti must be considered as part of the industrial developer's cost structure. The competitiveness of highly suitable sites within the City and elsewhere in the County is intense enough 1 that marginal or even moderate be rejected by the developer. quality sites could .� i 3 it '1 i I P4 04 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING INDUSTRIAL CONDITIONS 2.1 Established Industrial Development Policies In the development of industrial land uses within a community, the establishment of industrial goals and development standards are important policies that should be consistent with the City's Ger..eral. Plan. The City of Huntington Beach, through the process of citizen participation, has adopted general policies and standards applicable to industrial growth. The major objective and supplementary principles of the City's i � position regarding industrial development is outlined in the City's + Policy Plan, dated January 1974. These general policies are as follows: I Industrial Development Objective: Seek and encourage industrial development to broaden the City's economic base. Industrial Development Principles: 1. Work with industry to provide proper site planning that will provide for expansion and :Future needs. E3 5 . i n i i 2. Encourage industrial development in several dispersed industrial ^ parks. 3. Provide for proper location of land uses boti: w:.thin and adjacent to industrial areas. Buffer and transition standards should be established. 4. Establish rigid environmental standards. 5. Provide access to industrial areas by all available forms of transportation without disturbing surrounding land uses. , I 6. Carefully reevaluate the location of areas zoned for industrial n development. i The above policies evolved from extensive citizen input in formu- lating several policy statements relating to land use development, 11 environment and resources, and societal and cultural aspects within the community. This effort to seek citizen participation in forma- lating City goals and objectives was accomplished through a citizens i steering committee policy program conducted from 1970 to 1973. A detailed discussion and explanation of the process and final adoption of the policies is �rovided within the contents of the City's Policy Plan document. 2. 2 Existing Uses on Industrial Designated Land (7, � In March of 1976, an acreage inventory of industrial land within Huntington Beach was conducted by the City's Planning Department. + The survey included an analysis of general planned and zoned industrial land by existing use and geographic area within the City. Also included was an inventory of pending industrial projects. 2.2.1 General Planned and Zoned Industrial Land Figure 2.1 provides an inventory of acreage designated Light Industrial. by the General Plan Land Use Element. Over 1,436 acres or 8.3 percent of the City's total 17,372 acres is presently general planned Light Industrial. Geographic- ally, the Huntington Industrial Park Area accounts for approximately 52 percent of the Light Industrial category. Another 40 percent of the industrial land is located along the Central Industrial Corridor. From the standpoint of use, about 64 percent of the Light Industrial Land is vacant and 30 percent is developed to general industrial activity. The rest of the land is in oil related uses, non-conforming uses, or public utility. 1 Huntington Beach Policy Plan: Huntington Beach Planning Depart- ment, January, 1974. 6 P '�, • `� ' �.''' K� •1. I } 1A 1 J i •1 A similar pattern prevails with respect to industrial zoned land. However, the use of the M-1 and M-2 categories as in- dustrial criteria results in considerably more land zoned for industrial uses than general planned. Figure 2-2 shows a total of 2002 acres or 11.5 percent of the City' s total area zoned N-1 or M-2. Approximately 38 percent of the in- dustrial zoned land is located within the Huntington' Indus- trial Park Area. The Central Industrial Corridor accountsfor another 34 percent of the M-1/M-2 categories in the City. The remaining industrial acreage is located within the Edison Area (16 percent) and in scattered parcels south of Garfield Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard defined as the ra Old Town/Seacliff Area (12 percent) . About 23 percent of the total area is developed with general industrial function while 48 percent is vacant. The rest of the acreage is in public utilities (12 percent) , oil, related activities including extraction (14 percent) and non-conforming uses (3 percent! . 2.2.2 Existing Industrial Uses and Pending Projects i Figure 2-3 presents a tabularized description of all uses of industrial designated land, whether it is zoned, general planned, or both. The accompanying map, however, I limited to showing only industrial development, i.e. , general industrial, public utility, and oil related uses. From Figure 2-3 it is obvious that the vast majority of the existing industrial uses and current projects are concen- trated in two general sections of the City: the Huntington Industrial Park Area and the Central Industrial Corridor. Relatively large industrial acreages appear in the Edison area and old Town/Seacliff area, but these are dominated by i public utilities (Southern California Edison and orange County Sanitation District) and oil related activities, respectively. �* The Huntington Industrial Park Area, anchored in the northwest by the McDonnell-Douglas astronautics complex, contains an approximate: total of 263 acres of general industrial development (35 percent of the total area) . Most of this acreage is dominated by the 200 acre aerospace complex with its 1,150,000 square feet of floor space. Two i� industrial parks are located south of Bolsa Avenue: the Huntington Beach Industrial Park and the Huntington Beach Business Park. i The John D. Lusk and Sons' Huntington Beach Industrial Park encompasses a total of 303 acres of which 61 acres or 20 W � 7 ' I', i n FIGURE. 2-1 GENERAL PLAN INDUSTRIAL LAND' AREA G'IOSS ACRES PERCENT 754.4 52.5 Huntingtcn Industrial Park Area 3 39.6 Central industrial Corridor 568. � 113.6 7.9 Ii Edison Area Total 1,436. 3 100. 0 I n GROSS ACRES PERCENT USE r .._..General Industrial Development 425. 6 29.6 Oil Related Uses (Includes Extraction) 45. 3 3.1 �l 3 Public Utility .1 50. 3 3.5 Non-Conforming Uses 3.7 914. 8 1 6 Vacant .�. i Total 1,436. 3 100.0 i !I i i 1 1 General planned industrial land is based on the Light Industrial category. 8 r I �� •, • 4 i � • DO new � "� ►idi+C CaNSI .11Mt March Zq%b Adlh Fib.2-1 ! �Oi =kWORF*A I GENERAL PLAN INDUSTRIAL LAND n; FIGURE 2-2 EXISTING INDUSTRIAL ZONINGI I i AREA GROSS ACRES PERCENT Huntington Industrial Park Area 762.7 38.1 Central Industrial Corridor w 681.0 34.0 Edison Area 317.0 15.8 r n Old Town/Seacliff Area 241.3 12.1 Total 2,002. 0 100. 0 i t USE GROSS ACRES PERCENT C, General Industrial Development 465.4 23.3 Public Utility 248. 2 12.4 I Oil Related Uses (Includes Extraction) 276.7 13.8 Non-Conforming Uses 53.0 2.6 Vacant 958.7 47.9 2,002. 0 100.0 �- i 1 Industrial zoned land is based on the M-1 and M-2 categories. 10 I•. v.,�: .�.t —= `+�`': .ice:-' •+-t. x.^• � :r..• '�+' `1 tea: ,: :.r.•.. ..4 _ _ ___ __ _ _.__ __ r i.— r 71 ai DOt+FORNWIG USES) OIL RELATED USES 11% 0NaUDES EXTU CTK" Y 4� r 1-0 ! At rlr _■ L \suaA`I � S S p * * • i M t More t'im HINT GTON BE4CH,CXFC6VM PLANNING °OW-WI'N EXISTNG INDUSTRIAL ZONING ? rIGUAX 2-3 I EXISTING USES ON INDUSTRIAL ZONED LAND AND/OR GENERAL 1 PLANNED INDUSTRIAL LAND BY GEOGRAPHIC AA.l"A 1 AREA AND USE GROSS ACRES pig I t Huntington Industrial Park Area 762.7 100.0 } General Industrial 263.2 34.5 Development Public Utility 8.3 1.1 Vacant 491.E 64.4 Central Industrial Corridor 665.6 100.0 j General Industrial 167.2 27.3 Development Public Utility 27.9 4.1 �. oil Related Uses 23.0 3.3 (Includes Extraction) Ron-Conforming Uses 56.3 8.2 Vacant 391.2 57.1 Edison Area 317.0 100.0 General Industrial 7.0 2.2 Development C, Public Utility 203.7 64.3 oil Related Uses 28.7 9.0 (Includes Extraction) Vacant 77.6 24.5 i old Town/Seacliff Area 24.1.2 100.0 General Industrial 8.0 3.3 }1 Develofinent !` Public Utility 9.3 3.4 Oil Related Uses 223.0 93.3 (Inludes Extraction) I I TOTAL USE , :T- 104.0 ? General Industrial 465.4 23.2 Development Aerospace 1 202.3 Other Manufacturing 178.3 Wholesale Trade, and Misc. Dusinasa Servic�•s Warehouse and Storage2 94.8 Public Utility 349.2 12.4 Oil industry 276.1 13.E Oil Related Uses3 72.8 Extraction 201.9 Nan-Confnrminq Uses 56.3 2.8 Vacant :'60.0 47.1 1. Refer to standard industrial code list of industr!al categoT«es on page 2. includes warehouses, lusber yards, auto wrecking, junk yards, and storage. 3. Includes oil wquifinent and supply yards, storage tanke, and oil offices. �- ? I 12 L----=- lip • I . I iilE! as t r /StE1M a a =IiOlt tiff: _� i� a /iR111/1/ s s E. �r• ;IIf11li lrlll/IllflERl1[l1f/ fi1[r rr ar [l[Iillll a{ a t♦nil/t/ ►�tttt{t< < ��ll_I!</ El�it t" BE E r ar rr lef an...a ; / a�- �r j ♦Ifl ai _a r rr ■rflri� /• as r r _ ,�., ; +■s�'s ? a•E11ur [�: a �_�_ sib a fa[Qr ra a" a rr ftnfll s� as r a a + ra. s ar aar ala is rar111ilnEEls a _ [EE>tf► �.lflltll! r�,r ra ra '■a tea' rr r � ra r•• r f� ram• r sr {[ l/t a EEIEIt E a a r as ar a . ar a ar _ •7�YEi/t a.r•a. r�*�a ra rr ra ra r tt[fr ra 7ar f1f11tlJlgflllf fnfll�tt as �■ !s rfl/rEtEnr _ r . `►'i... r 7 sa �a ra rr ar sa a 1[11r aa'rr [nnilllRlRlnf [nail /1 tERl7/l1ltt�� EIIEEEElEa as ra rr •._ .ra as C: .. - , 'a sa ar a_ ra rt�iEtEili i a ra rr r rr as a_ r a ra ra rr r� _►t a. _ ..'fr rt7it/t1ttll a sa as �■� ra ra_ as- �t[[r r'Illr 11r1tllnfrl[nf [aEff[f%1 ra as rr r,� :Iltlrl!�R �' rya r �ala .�/�� rr a "' s ■[1Er iln[t it/1 t[IRr[nfs r as ar •■a r r as rr ra sa _a a _ r a• as aw rs r�' rltj/ r as rr rr ra r�/Irl'■//II r-sr a r r• .r sr r•7 �_ CC rasa ri. • [ar. _ r ra _ ZI11 ' ar���a a r ,a r rr ra• "islf//UR,� sq���■�a• �r'�a �[i� �: LII/1 +ri �.�� =•r.rr �■a+,aia ii■ '� iEi� q='�[�_wf�il� arl�ss ir•r • ..a a a. r 1a •i a r Y.•■• a ar. a.ra +ra.a.' Or_ra rr-.rw. rr is rr•r rr _� rs a/♦ �+ irL1l1I/lt//'r r• y _a rr'_r r_�/nR� a a„ra ar: a'ra as a ■•� 1 +. a/Enr ++•� I ra.r+ar.ra'r_ ra _ a ra ar +.• r sr rr aJill , rrr �w}�i�m:iC i •a .. r 'i :My�r,��raar,.rt�sri�a�wa a�aarar+�a' aV�.rVaa�ar�rti+aai�aai�as • WOMEN lam[ '- __ ••.• _ r• [/ I111111i/0[ � =+�.- ��:� � ,.. 1� -fit t�lYt all It got ?il!ltfill 1!i i11!lllttll H •//lllr■ �• ara as r-_ a ♦i �� '� •`t�' ��4r�!! . i,�1l�ftill_A =- ff)1►�• �a� �� � _ _ : ....._ - . . _r �J ra`■� are � f 1 a �• .•� , kQ1 R • �' t •r r•e� �f 1 t f . :13 s M �r ■. �r ra �a r ���t■■■.Ir11t111111 " � • •rrw nr ww• w w .1r � ■M.r rfWl.tarlr■+�� .at r rnr I rrt■ .. 1 1 t r. Ilr�r Itllllltr wuurr r�r +� r 111Mr�1■1 11s f � • y I 5C r i11r1�1;���� 1111111�'� �: rritr►�, * s" � �\ �1 '',1 1/r I/looses �•r`i rri= i ' + ��/ 62 r '1 .rr..� w-rr r I / Ira r r rr. { rs w=No T ` ,i ! rr rr .1 go ..1i I11111/t�.•r Z. Cil • wr. wr j� irr11�11i rr G= • fill �a f111 t1Nr� • Ilrll:tttr•Illrrr=` r,ti�l.rl�l�u • � r I I rJ A rrrrr■aulrr _rt11�r/ � � _ Ill,a�w7yr�1MM ■'1��11�t fr ■ lil�t!•���,1■ �Iwll Irt�I� Ultlllll�t ;��1: .� L� Jillwl u�l ■ u�,�r�44l{tlll +� .. � 1��1■� 1 1 Ire�`Ci��`.! t1r�1 a � i �` �j � ■ �wriit� 1111r/1 IMP 11111 y; 11111 rr4. w�rWS.rold � _c _ wr�ww w r ■ lw�■�I �=r w r / /11II�M \'1 ►,.� t•+/ ;:.;4 ti � r LI �r ■1 w�l1�1��11111�; �'�Mjwi�11'1= ,..;4, �. . �rt■■iri//11/Ot rt wIM1 IIII rNUl WINin '■r111t/ IIII rift/ 1 � r�■��•A`■fir"„■� `,�.:� � (l2-114r/ r 1 � l .. ."-�-- I£�Irr� �:iirr•„',■„rl"ii rin ' `a�a■rr ' �'�' .—..•..... �. iq�illlip lll�l" P`= � C D "�.�7 ,,"",,,..,«...._.«.-.wn'tllll tll`7�•..`3 111��' � /�ww Q � .Nr�,....w.warlt■. ww !a.A�ll •' �� t 11Ar V Q Q {r{ � �� w r r- �r / ....MEN r rjr • r wI r . u . ■ � ■r w lit w.t•. S Ma 11411' MINIONS r //`r♦ 1/r/1t rlrrrrlr r� :C � f71'ar w Mall, • so rr.ra �NH•,I1 � U•..Ila�rull� �:�g�_� '• ::�.�;;'�;': :� g. ��r'ttrlr/r 40 T,1. ylbl 'i '11 ,p -NIVI1 8.A111 �.•:.'� 1 ; ;:;.; w , i`Cr 11111 ate ;l 1plos; 4 � lilll+Irt'IIGIMII: ?I,lill�11 +I�f11 :r .r.• ::.'':a'Y ����+ 1t�111��1t1� >1rrr11rt111 rlr r:. D II)Juf. dMl[ll - H,7PIIR1 nrnr � Yilt■ri= all NIrIYl11° � omm III WIWI Sill gilt -,.. �i r r nrr■ ■r�rimr .r.y�• r '�� ii•' li11 Cs lrig '•` j( �� tl1�1��1 I- �i�` `� ow I all IVA 8 tip OG i 1 � � r� � • ro � w • -c,�p , :��AL i ,.. ..`. "'•��M 'I �jUj, �� t �► • �`� , ElkVA 02A- `�!�:}••-t�:•,Zi►�j��1 ' o a �� •,yrt!ti����C+.�►�.r �•���,I�I`�•�!�!;!; � V�' i!'r'��~���i�♦ 'i�lSj�. KOM Al • r1 i i .r percent was developed and occupied as of March 1976. The first industrial building was constructed in 1971, and the E park now contains 80 buildings with a total floor area of about 970,000 square feet. The vacancy factor for constructed buildings in the park is presently less than one percent. All development has occurred south of McFadden Avenue on M-1-A-15, 000 or 20,000 square foot minimum lots. Of the remaining 94 acres south of McFadden, approximately 59 acres are now subdivided and either under construction, sold, or in escrow. ' .� North of the Huntington Beach Industrial Park is the Kaiser Aetna Huntington Beach Business Park. The Kaiser Aetna area is planned to accommodate a total of 129 acres of light industry. About 14 acres at the southwest corner of Bolsa Avenue iand Springdale Street are now zoned for commercial development. The owners expect to integrate commercial services that will support the ad- jacent industrial developments. The Huntington Beach Business Park is tentatively scheduled for first phase development in 1976 or 1.977. The Central Industrial Corridor, commonly referred to as in the "Gothard strip", contains approximately 187 acres of general industrial uses, or 27 percent of the corridor' s area. All buildings are currently occupied. The Central Industrial Corridor extends north-south along Gothard Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way be- ' ! tween Edinger Avenue and Garfield Avenue. Excluding those industrial uses between Edinger Avenue and Hell Avenue, 1 the majority of uses along the central corridor are marginal.. The industries south of Warner Avenue are typically wholesale distributors, warehousing and storage r operations, and manufacturing concerns that find ad- vantage in locating along railroad lines or upon land that is physically marginal. Although the Central Industrial Corridor has been industrially zoned and general planned for many years, the demand for such sites has not been promising. However, two new industrial parks have f recentli been planned along the corridor that may spur i further industrial development. The Huntington Beach Industrial Development Company is ! developing an initial 10 acres of light industry in an area east of he Southern Pacific Railroad tracks between Talbert Avenue and Taylor Drive. The developers hope that the 10 acre development will generate construction within the adjoining 40 acres of vacant industrially { zoned properties to the east. In 1973, a specific plan i 13 .., .r of this area was approved by the City Council-1 The plan provides for the orderly development of the area as a plalined industrial complex bordered on the south by a landscape buffer. Another recent project along the corridor has been pro- pcsed by the Mountjoy Construction Company. Encompassing approximately 14 acres, the project site is located on the r- east side of Gothard Street: between Ellis Avenue: and Talbert Avenue. 2. 3 Industrial Employment This section examines the existing industrial employment structure in Huntington Beach. In January 19761 the Huntington Beach Office of Economic Development surveyed the industrial firms in the City according to location, type of activity, Standard Industrial Code (S.I.C.) classification, and employment. Another vurvey of the City' s industrial base was completed at the same time by the Planning Department as part of the Urban Data. Inventory program. The results of both were combined into a cross-sectional analysis of industrial employment in the City. Figure 2• 4 presents employment by size of firm and major sector. Figure 2-5 contains an inventory of employment based upon the federal Standard Industrial Code system. The S.I.C. classi- fication offers a convenient method of looking a" employment struc- ture in that a single code number identifies the principal type of activity pursued by each fizz. it thus permits disaggrigation of the seven major employment sectors from Figure 2-4. In January 1976, industry accounted for about one -third of the total b persons working within Huntington Beach. approximately 10,830 persons work for 306 industrial firms. The industrial distribution is radically skewed by five firms which each employ more than 250 peraonb and account for 86 percent of the industrial employment base. The largest employers are: (1) 11cDonnell-Douglas, 7,500; (2) Southern California Edison, 700; (3) General Telephone, 590; (4) Burmah Oil and Gas, 300; and (5) Cambro Manufacturing Company, 250. Only McDonnell-Douglas and the Cambro Company fall into the general industry category. These companies located in Huntington Beach some time ago and are not typical of the economic scale or activities attracted over the past five years. However, the Weiser Lock Company has tentative plans to relocate its Los Angeles based plant to a 42 acre parcel in the Huntington Beach Industrial Park. This firm would ultimately employ about 21500 people. 1 Taylor Drive Specific Plan, Huntington Beach Planning Department, October 1M. 14 m I FIGURE 2-9 INDUSTRIAL FIRMS AND EMPLOYMENT WITHINHUNTINGTOtJ BEACH � Firm Size (Eme72yees) No. Firms Employment 1000+ 1 500-1000 2 7500 250-5p0 2 1290 100-250 0 550 50-100 0 25-50 2 100 t 10-25 27 a 278 { 1-•10 263 335 •--- 777 306 10, 330 Use EmplaYment No. Firms Aerospace 7500 Other Manufactur;t;g 1247 1 Wholesale Trade 125 173 Misc. Business Services; 39 Warehouse and Storage 10 65 Public Utilities 9 l03 15 Oil Industr 1 Y 403 2 4G3 11 10,,830 306 e f i e� i i i tI S i ti '"- 15 1 w Flour* 2-S X7[PLOTMia1r Sr RTA91C.1D IRGufTRIAL COOK CLASSIFICATIOV USX AND A 9.:.C. CODC 1<IiILOT%Wr *3. Pipe ALAOSPACt T.500 1 3760 Guided Missiles, space 7,500 1 Vehicles and Parts other Manufacturing 1,217 1)3 2000 food a Kindred Produetr 15 3 2200 Textile PradUcta t 3 7300 Apparel Fabrics 14 5 2400 L•asber, except Furniture Is 2 2500 Furniture a Fixtures 47 30 27DO Printing 4 Publishing 61 10 2800 Chemicals a A111e4 Products 120 8 3000 Rubber L Plastic Pralucts 27I 11 3200 stone, Clay, ulaos Concrete It 13 3300 Primary Metal Incustrles :1 4 3400 Fabricated Metel, except 130 20 ' Machinery a Trans. =quip. 35DO Machinery, except Electrical 102 28 3600 Electrical and electronic 80 Is Machinery 3700 Transportation Cquipaant 51 14 3100 Inetrurents 4 optical Goods 10I 8 3900 Misc. Manufacturing Ind. 100 16 f wholesale Trade 125 39 5010 Motor Vehicles a Autopobils 10 3 Parts and Supplies 5020 Furniture. Home Furnishings IQ 5 5040 sporting, Recreational, Photo, 6 3 Hobs ^.OWV, Toys 5060 tlectrical Goods 7 3 $070 Harduare. Plumbing. Heating 5 2 5080 Machinery, Lquipment, Supplies 29 9 Sago Itive. Durable Goods 51 I1 5100 Mon-Durable Goods 7 3 Mtse. Business Services 162 61 1500 Conatruction - General 12 3 Contractors 1600 Construction - Other 37 15 1700 Construction - Spacial Trades 3 2 7310 Advertising 4 2 7330 Mailing, Reproduction, Cara- 10 2 mercial Art, Photos, rD Stenographic services 7340 Services to Buildings 1 3 1 Dwellings 7370 CoLVater a Data Proccesing 1 1 7190 RISC.-Research 4 Testing 36 12 75no Autcoobile Repair a Seri.:ea 13 i 7600 rites. top air 4 torvlces 29 11 y 6f00 PUN - Xnginesrinq 14 6 {f wareh&jse and Storage 103 1S 4200 Motor Freight Transportation 32 3 $030 Luvjmr 6 Construction Material 27 2 7320 misc. Rentals, etc. 38 9 7500 Salva3ing - Pluto 6 1 oil Related 403 11 J 3900 Petroleum Refining and 360 6 Xxtraction 3500 OIL Machinery 8 1 4200 Oil Trucking 25 1 5994 Oil Storage 8 2 7310 Oil Services - Misr. 2 1 Public utilities 1,210 2 ' 4100 communication W 1 4900 Rlectric, Gas, Sanitary Services , 700 1 t6 13;iT6- 33i C7 1 16 a I , I The other 301 concerns presently located in the City provide employ- ment for about 14 percent of the industrial labor force. Most establishments employ less than 10 people. They are the major scale and type of operation that has been filling up the Huntington Beach Tndustrial Park (south of McFadden Avenue) and the small parks along the Central Industrial Corridor (north of Heil Avenue) over the last five years. The small plants are usually involved in a combination of activities in order to reduce costs. It is typical to find many firms engaged in manufacturing and/or wholesale trade and business I services. Retail sales in combination with the above operations are less common, though the Huntington Beach Zoning ordinance permit an industrial firm to use up to 25 percent of its floor space for q commercial retail ancillary uses. 2.4 Revenues and Expenditures Generated by Industrial Uses Local communities normally seek industrial development in order to promote economic growth. It not only expands employment in the 1r# industrial sector, but generates impulses to the rest of the local economy as well. New employment is created in support activities of other economic sectors and revenues accrue to local municipali- ties and school districts. This section deals with the revenue/ expenditure aspects of industrial development in Huntington Beach. r� The 1976 R`venuesfEx enditures Analysis of Land Uses sampled a variety of areas within the City to determine mum c pal and school district financial returns and costs per acre generated '3y , industrial development,. The study sampled 50 sites in the Huntingto Industrial Park Area and Cenral Industrial Corridor* bldtown Area, and Edison Area. The results are shown in Figure 2-6. ra Industrial development rends :o Have a mixed effect on municipal finances depending upon the type of activity and location. On the f average, the aerospace industry shows a net gain to the City, whereas general light industry exhibits a net loss. The significant positive affect of McDonnell-Douglas on net City revenues is a •� function of revenues generated (mainly from property taxes) exceed- ing expenditures for municipal services. Municipal service expendi- tures for light industrial developments exceed revenues accrued to the City. As depicted in Figure 2-6, the major reason for the $250 net loss per acre of light industry is found in the low revenues generated by developments along the Central Industrial Corridor. .� Light industry in the Huntington Indmstri.al Park Area shows a net per acre gain to the City, while the Central Industrial. Corridor: shows a considerable net loss. Total revenue from the Central Industrial Dark Area is. almost 74 percent higher than revenue generated by sites along the G-athurd strip. With the exception of the area north of Heil Avenue, many corridor developments represent AM16 17 4 • FIGURE 2-6 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL CITY AND SCHOOL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES PER ACRE OF INDUSTRIAL LANnl City City Net Gain or City Revenues2 Expenditures Loss per Gr.Ac. Citywide Generated IncurreL1 per Year ell Light Industry +1,309 -1,559 250 Aerospace +2,489 -1,464 +1,025 Huntington Industrial Park Area Light Industry +1,626 -1,559 + 67 Aerospace +2,489 -1,46.1 +1,025 Central Industrial G-)rridor Light Industry + 955 -1,559 -604 School School tlet Gain or r School Revenges Expenditures Loss per Gr.Ac. Citywide Genes d Incurred-per Year Light Indcatry +2,868 0 +2,868 Aerospace +7,588 0 +7,588 Huntington Industrial Park Area ;. Light Industry +3,984 0 +3,984 Aerospace +7,53IJ 0 +7,588 Central Industrial Corridor Light Industry +1,363 0 +1,368 i 1 Revenues Expenditure Analysis of Land Usefrz: Huntington Beach Planning Department, 1976. I 2 Includev share of property tax collected for recreation and parks purposes. f r <� R Ir 1 le Aft I �A marginal improvements (such as wholesale distributors, warehousing, and open storage operations) upon land of low assessed value. As a result, property tax revenues to the City are almost three times lower than those: from the Huntington Industrial Park Area. Industrial development in Huntington Beach makes a significant ► � contribution to the local school districts. The McDonnell-Douglas aerospace facility contributes almost t-;tree times as much net revenue per acre as light industrial 6evelopment. Looking at light ' industry by geographic area, the Huntington Industrial Park Area generates three times more net revenue per acre than the Central Industrial Corridor. The foregoing analysis should be qualified to the extent; that it is based or, a case study of existing industrial uses in Huntington Beach. Its applicability to future developments depends on the method by which it is employed. The location, size, and makeup of A future developments must be considered when using the Average annual figures in order to accurately assess the potential economic costs and benefits. Although light industry shows a net loan to the City, moreover, the analysis only accounts for the direct effect. in- direct revenues from the growth of support industries, related construction, and consumer expenditures are not reflected in the .� study. Mt 19 b � f �'A A 3. 0 FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 3.1 Regional Perspective In order to determine future land requirements in Huntington Beach, 04 the City's industrial development must be understood in context of this regional economy. This section analyzes areawide industrial density, l future employment growth, and projected regional land needs within ` Orange County. i 0% 3.1.1 Existing Areawide Industrial Density To ascertain industrial density in Orange County, an area-- wide land survey was conducted by the Huntington Beach Planning Department in the early part of 1976. This surrey was compared with the most recent Orange County Planning Department inventory (December, 1972) to establish a general. trend. Employment data was derived from the annual reports published by the California Employment Development Depart- ment. In December 1972, the number of wage and salary jobs in activities located within Orange County was approximately 487,700. Industrial employment accounted for 175,540 or 35 percent of the total available jobs. At the same time, the Orange County land use survey showed a total of 12,552 acres developed to industrial uses. This yielded a rough Countywide industrial density of 14 employees per acre. V 21 y ` tf of Although the recent recession has slightly reduced the rate of job creation and land development, the Orange County economy has remained relatively healthy. In January 1976, about 793,000 residents constituted the County's labor pool, ^ � of which 7.2 percent were classified as unemployed. Accord- ing to the State Employment Development Department, the County provided work for approximately 596,000, of which industrial firms accounted for 205,875 employees or 35 percent of the total jobs. j n ; The 1976 land use survey shows a total of 24 ,103 acres zoned and/or general planned for industrial use in Orange County i (including Huntington Beach) . Approximately 10,991 acres are vacant and 13,112 acres developed. Tl ,� developed por- tion of the County yields a regional density of 15.7 em- ployees per acre. � Over the past three years, Orange County's industrial ' density has shown a general increase. A recent Orange County Business solicitation of County business leaders may suggest some reasons for this trend. First, there has been a steady influx of large, well financed companies that are � ! well positioned to be active in a depress%zd real estate market. These firms seek large facilities usually measuring 80,000 square feet or more. Firms looking for space in Orange County represent a mix of local companies which are expanding or relocating and remaining in the area, plus i an on-going influx of businesses primarily from the Los Angelis area. The influx of the large firms is based upon ! their recognition of the County's competitive property tax i structure and the availability of a large skilled labor pool. Moreover, the availability of industrial land affords oppor- tunities for business firms to expand their operations on an orderly, long-range basis. Large space users have brought about a significant change in the County's industrial real estate market. These firms seek existing vacant properties, rather than building a facility to their specifications. Inflationary factors result in the existing structure costing significantly less than it would cost to buy land and construct a new facility. These firms also defer their capital expenditures and retain them for rwre immediate use in the business. As a result, sale to developers of raw land which would be suitable sites for speculative projects has dropped appreciably. However, it is believed that the County will attract a wide variety of business firms from the standpoint of size in future years. This steady demand should eventually stimulate a new cycle of construction of speculative buildings. Industrial density will fluctuate in the future, but for the i purposes of this study it is assumed that the County density '. 22 fly u I I will maintain a stability of 14.9 employees per acre through the year 2000. This figure represents an average of the 1972 and 1976 densities. 3.1.2 Regional Employment Projections The SCAG-76 Growth Forecast Policy is the basis of employ- ment projections rbr Mangg COU71ty and Regional Statistical Area 38 (RSA 38 contains the Cities of Huntington Beach, Westminster, Fountain Valley, and Seal Beach) through the � year 2000. The results are presented in Figure 3-7. The projections indicate that Orange County's total employment and industrial employment will almost double by the year 2000. Between 1976 and 2000, the County will show a net gain of 158,757 industrial employees. In the already urban- ized areas of the County, Anaheim and Santa Ana are forecasted to attract the bulk of the expected employment gain. The newer areas of southeast Orange County, focusing a on the Irvine Industrial Complex and Newport Beach, are also forecasted to be rapid employment growth generators. i h The area encompassed by RSA 38 will grow at a steady rate, i such that it will maintain a total and industrial employment share of about 10 percent between_ 1976 and 2000. Within RSA 38, Huntington Beach will grow slightly faster than the surrounding Cities of Westminster, Fountain Valley, and Seal Beach (as a group) . By 2000, the industrial base of Huntington Beach will more than double, showing a net gain of approximately 10,352 employees. The City will account for 6 percent of the County and 58 percent of the RSA 38 industrial labor force. 3.1.3 Area Planned for Future Industrial Development j The 1976 County-wide land use survey shows a total of 13,112 industrial ac.reo developed, leaving approximately 10091 acres, or 46 percent, developable. If the regional industrial density of 14.9 employees per acre is applied to the County growth projections, industrial growth will consume the available acreage as follows: 1976-1980 + 46,064 employees + 3,092 acres 1980-1990 + 62,673 employees + 4,206 acres 1990-2000 + 50,020 employees + 3,357 acres TOTAL: +158,757 employees + 10,655 acres In the short-run (1976-1980) , an estimated 3,092 acres (or 28 percent) will be needed to absorb the expected industrial growth. By 2000, industrial employment growth will require about 10, 655 acres, or 97 percent, of the currently avail- able acreage. 23 I I I s� N FIGURE 3-7 REGIONAL ER LOYM-11T PROQECTIOM 1976-2000. 1970 1973 1976 1980 1990 2000 sty - Total Employment 475,700 100% 530,740 100% 595,900 100% 770,000 100% 1 983,000 100% 1,153,000 100% Industrial , 136;059 1003 164,376 100% 180,500 100A 226,564 100% 289,237 100% 339,257 100% Employment` RSA 38 Huntington Beach: Total Employment 25,117 5.3% 29,090 5.4% 32,729 5.5♦ 37,442 4.9% 51,410 5.2% 61,237 5.3% Industrial 9,213 6.8% 9,058 5.5% 9,540 5.3% 12,162 5.4% 16,700 5.8% 19,892 5.9% Employment Other Cities3 Total Employment 27,983 4.4% 26,525 4.9% 29,840 5.0% 36,958 4.9% 45,190 4.6% 58,763 5.1% Industrial 5,396 4.0% 6,531 4.0% 7,166 4.0% 9,179 4.1% 11,223 3.9% 14.594 4.3% Employment PSA 38 4btal Employment 46,100 55,615 62,568 74,400 96,600 120,000 Huntington Beach 54_.5e 52.3% 52.T1 50.3% 53.2% 51.0% Other Cities 45.5% 47.7% 47.7% 49.7% 46.8% 49.0% Industrial 14,609 15,589 35,706 21,341 27,923 34,486 Employment Huntington Beach 63.1% 58.1% 57.1% 57.0% 59.8% 57.7% Other Cities 36.9% 41.9% 42.9% 43.0% 40.2► 42.3% I. SCAG-76 GRG4M FORECAST POLICY: Southern California kw:.ociation of Goverrments, January 1976. 2. Industrial Employment includes only gen-.ral manufacturing and wholesale trade. 3. Other Cities of RIM 38 includes Westminster, Fountain Valley, and Seal Beach. t Ali I This does not mean that every acre presently designated for industry in Orange County will be pressed into use. Differ- ences in regional demand within the County will result in some communities expanding industrial inventories while others will retire acreage. The 1976 County land use survey found this already occurring. Several communities in north Orange County are currently rezoning sizeable portions of their industrial land to residential and other uses. Others are maintaining the existing amount of industrial land but A are reducing acreage at unsuitable locations and increasing acreage at more favorable locations. Hopes are to consolidate vacant parcels for industrial park development in order to improve competitive position within the County. The SLAG growth study indicated that AnahFim, Santa Ana, and Irvine are likely to have the fastest growth rates. �'�► These areas will probably expand their inventories of vacant industrial land. The Irvine Industrial Complex already has plans for expansion to a 2,000 acre site adjoining El Toro Marine Base and a 330 acre site in Tustin. 3.2 Industrial Potential in Huntington Beach 0s Given the expected regional framework of future industrial employment growth and land requirements, attention is now directed to a specific analysis of the future industrial potential in Huntington Beach. This section proceeds from a study of the City's future land requirements to a suitability analysis of undeveloped industrial sites. 3.2.1 Future Land Requirements Land needs in the City are based upon an adjusted density factor which more closely reflects the type and scale of industry to be attracted in :,iture years. The industrial density factor is derived from the current densities in the Cit:y's general industrial development sectr_.:-s plus the Count density. It is determined as follows: Aerospace 37. 1 employees/acre w Other Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, and Misc. Business Services 8.0 employees/acre Warehouse and Storage 1.2 employees/acre Orange County Average 14. 9 employees/acre + H City Average: 15. 3 employees/acre The inclusion of aerospace and warehousing is significant i to the extent that potential large and small space-using firma attracted to the City are accounted for. These � 0 sectors are less important in terms of the type of industry attracted in the future. Most new industry will fall into j , t the general manufacturing (other than aerospace) and whole- sale trade categories, requiring building floor space in the 10,000 to 30,000 square foot range. Industrial densities will typically range from 8 to 15 employees per acre n , These characteristics are applicable to the Huntington Beach industrial Park Area and certain portions of the Central Industrial Corridor. Application of the City's industrial density of 15.3 employ- j ees per acre to the expected employment growth yields the following future industrial land requirements: 1976-1980 + 2,622 employees +171. 4 acres 1980-1990 + 4,538 employees +296. 6 acres 1990--2000 + 3,192 employees +208.6 acres +10,352 employees +676. 6 acres Short--.•_•un lndnatrial growth (1976-1980) will generate a need for 171 acres, or 25 percent of the total required area. The cumulative total will reach 468 acres (69 percent) by 1990, and 677 acres (100 percent) by 2000. The City currently has about 960 acres of vacant industrial land available for development and 56 acres in non-conforming uses. The foregoing analysis thus indicates that the City has approximately 340 acres in excess of its estimated requirement. This conclusion is not intended to mean that 340 acres ofj industrial space should be rezoned to other uses. It merely affords decision-makers an understanding based upon a consistent methodology that the City has too much industrial land relative to its needs. Its future appli- cability necessarily depends upon the methodology employed. Given the instability of projections in the long-run (beyond 1980) , the actual future land requirement could be quite different than estimated in this study. However, the margin of error is not believed to be so great that the City would find itself with a shortage of industrial space ! , in future years. 3.2.2 Suitability of Undeveloped Industrial Sites The City currently has about 960 gross acres of vacant land available for industrial expansion. Over one-half of the total vacant area is concentrated in the Huntington } Beach Industrial Park Area, while the rest is located along the Central Industrial Corridor and within the Edison Area. i In order tc determine development potential, an industrial j suitability analysis of vacant sites was conducted by the Planning ,Department in late 1975. Figure 3- 8 depicts the t 26lip t v results of the evaluation by range of suitability and ,ieographic area. The suitability study rated approximately 664 acres as prime land for industrial development. About 74 percent of the prime space is concentrated in the Huntington Industrial Park Area. Without exception, parcels in this area are almost ideal from the criteria of excellent transportation access to a minimum of required site work. The essential h advantages responsible for the past success of the indus- trial park will apply to future industrial development, i.e. , i quality, services, and awareness of the market. Quality encompasses such things as construction, design, access, ! environment, and centralized location. Service refers to the flexibility of the park developer to satisfy the changing needs of existing tenants as well as those of potential clients. Market awareness is reflected in the knowledge that many industries have not been adversely affected by the changing economy, but in fact continue to he growth i industries. As a result of these circumstances, the Hunting- ton Industrial Park and Business District should be the major area of future industrial encouragement in the City. Since the Huntington Industrial Park Area at full develop- ment will meet only 73 percent of the total projected land requirement, favorable areas along the Gothard corridor must be considered for the future. The suitability analysis determined that about 25 percent, or 167 acres, of the highest rated industrial space is located along the Central Industrial Corridor. Parcels rated high intersperse with medium and low quality parcels with no clear continuum along the corridor. One concentration of prime industrial parcels is located north of Warner Avenue. Another group extends along the west side of Nichols Street between Warner and Slater Avenues. A final concentration of prime undeveloped land extends along Talbert Avenue east of Gothard Street, and along the east side of Gothard Street between Ellis Avenue and Talbert Avenue. Approximately 57 pp y percent of the potential site area along the Central Industrial Corridor received a medium or low suitability rating. The study found that such sites possessed one or a variety of problems. The following are prevalent: ' 1. Landlocked parcel or parcel abutting a railroad and/or a local street. 2. Parcel in an area of mixed uses encroaching into the industrial area. 3. Low fire protection rating based on a lack of adequate water supply (water mains and fire hydrants) for fire fighting. :7 A FIGURE 3-8 A SUITABILITY OF VACANT LEND FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (GROSS ACPXS) A Vacant Land High Medium Low Total Huntington Industrial Park Area 491. 2 0 0 491. 2 Central Industrial Corridor 81. 0 208. 4 101.8 391. 2 Edison Area 6.1 10.2 61.3 77. 6 Total 578.3 218. 6 163.1 960.0 Land with Non-Conforming Uses ' I High Medium Low Total Central Industrial Corridor 1.2 38. 3 16.8 56.3 rt C.+ f u . 29 1 a N A Offs I/r I ! Ilrll rat � L■i i�`�•1N�i " ■ n r. In at /�N/i r /11fiq/ilwI—s1 • �t rr/l/l /faprllltlaf . �muriZ�� 11/rtr trrlrn nr/rf/n� �l 1r1rrflu liul/liilf■ ■■nA1�iI1111� n�wnvr. w � t Y.y i ltl:wM w How�it r ..w.�■rt■ �' r rr wilt/11f11 flrfr -r q- •Ilrfl no r« rr �. rlfrl w� w� rr111� , wwr. Mw rllr,tl _ " w��11i11i! .= .riw. .w.f111% AGO Its r 11 f a t.■. ww �i1/Il1 ■■ IIs�►�r IIi111�� ad r�■ ��rr rrr� r� ■ ■rrrr = �t��Ifrlr'■am am wlMlrl f �'' '''` r Illllll/100 / rfMA lingo pillion iflflr 1.1f1 l No Oslo Lill Mai-III rris ■ ir•>,w ww .f/Ill ■ •�r rr wr ■ wlw Iwriw a ■■_ �_-� r p 11$ ;��uufll-rniii:q :: ariUl�rrrizrlNl "iulhll�M ,.a �P,pill/11�11�II1 1I11% -* IIIIII111IM roll% �w r11I1111111 1r1/ • ll/lU/11• :�,, 11f111IfIN1 111Pq ►.r�lnfrftrin tiirr _ "� .��IM ;lilrrinnu B ill$ r ulnfr n ilni - l y IIloilo 11111111 �i►i111tils 1WIN , wA111111111111'1111/ w w- Mimi ►�1 : Rwn��w�i« rwt • tZ.r�rf yr •rr�� �Ui eiiiiii or 4 tlil�{1i �rG+xgill Inol g-lipi 11111ff,1111r111f//�11/ 1lrlr!►Or�111rIII tool rrr'iR'i'!-ar •� I�i3*iti�'!ti or.= �,: ,rr��;�agtllffrllr/ ffrr i�iU ."".�..r-atr wr • /fir rw.•r \lei++�, ��� -. =M��tri't(r� ,r, 111fii111 . . ,+�1•+� '�/ _ 111fr //IM� � Iiitfrrlf z /r+i !�ir�:��1r1►, �i� e1rt Am 11 /.lam fIIY C"""`'. t.. rR "n,,�A r�iw^,1f11\■R �I III1�1/Ir �� t��: �� r•• f1111f• sir ll1111111-111 11111 1111t11ff wn ..-+rr ww�irwrt`.• « ♦ I 1111150 Ilo 11/ n'w, t "'r4" 11� rriw r wr rZ'�/.1■1.1�,y .... 1lrrfi/�IIr111►1 �ww �Il ww'wr n■ tt11► ♦ //j Miss$ 1II1111��� l�11r llrlrr111 .• �11t1flltitlirii� iit►��i! ;s► Ills Il1ii11rR�tr .ww.■■■r■■ i...x+c_ lffrlll/rf/1I111i11fs ' 1111/ 11r11111111/ �` +; �- nrlrlllr rrr1l111 =.. __ E �\`,, 1 I: I■ �Illll IIIIUgltli I dl!iSlllll Iltl(IIIIUI. _� r , lillil!faill r, ON �■ im LOOP Ear n r I;IIIIMIIIii '' FaYf r `r • + �•• h•- I' !f 1,111 O. , ir. S f r A' rf f•l f r.rt� T I P I ■ mool �� T>•:• 4n`) A.fkf � �i•'1na , C��vc�1� ' sills �I+ �• 1111,11!111 �IW■ ,�111r �1.:.' -� =� - hlurll %:llwl '■Mr.11nn-� ..*1111�11 �� w '� '. .�IINR 111li!!i� hrghl:►•1tl�r MOO r �• •+ r !'.lKwo, 1111h'h; I'd'111 1'1`b .' +mac-� 1" IIHH:1•Il� MAN 41111ITy. /91111, iwlwi 'raw �_r p1r w �■ wr, Mr low � Idi111F11:'t11Pf.hi �I:f�117 � ,tlA'.,' irw■•■rwr■� �w �� tlrlrl � wr�r lap Il ,,li w� r� 11�11111111 WiIl1 1 � ^^ rr /1111t11r t111t� OKI Ilk '16 Aj r .yr I MIGhI r _• ■1 1 r1 Itr ,1r111 � ■ t �l,r�jr1�/1��,1�117:�1u1Uy„ ,Iti,,11Y' w 1 r r Y 4,�;uw....w..:�:+.r�+.:w.�■1.wr - j�111n1[ IrI/�r/ ""'11�I1i IIIIIiIiIJ `50- ,) t<k � lil oil ittTrtilillli�•1 =� rw 11l wlfill of1 'tM, I1 t � ...,}r,• r■ri.ar.ry lh �r/t11 w 1111 bill M11 ■1 � " " '' '- 1i11 //ut nua uiinr!!':!'I fill •_ y,t.r wrti r I list, {lilt/�� A[t1it11t1[R>fllllff[[r ■ a + I11111111 •P3 ""1",',. �1 ,'�111111111�IIIw ..r U 'tt ,1■ ■wa w,++ „,"( ~ �fff���111 Jam+ iya,lir� U1?/t/Irlt . .ri.i go Jill ^ � 1111 , V .■wIw �■M�u.�go //Ittl� .w.1 r wwUlrw r mull y r� : PiNi1i[ iiii {�,M�. v agg'.� urr /ulr1�� I rw wwfi�wCi :�1111 � ■.t irrlrq >1 It /r\ A1443311 rill rr rw•wr Mr IJIIUI � 1 t t1 •+ 'Is wiwlrw wr.ww�• \[illl w ■It ZM r a �t3'f IIIw�Y'M" CC all 61M- r .� �• rl� /111 ���►ttl!ww yr� 1111111■ \l,ll,l r ��Billtl� r w � �+r/ R wrwr■r��t. . w w :- .y..�c r.,.,.. �1 p�p 's-' .,: :�. ,W 1it�J tt�mml(r •RI►t U.. �' �.,»....,. {tl iltl � :��`;.�?'�``� ,L,1•�Atlt�l<�nti��lrum�� r.r.wr..Wr..y t �^"' [ ■1 dui' r�r� t/r IltldfN IIlt�11A1� d,A ,t t'ttV jt rrt I. .w.■Rtr �i'tt�t/1�i1t •', t. .�j� <.;�� •�r tea. w 4. 1nu11,1t11nq ;;" fa1111111.11111111 11 ^� IIMII ■IIII 1/tt 11nw 1� ttul NIl1���1t11�11 � M•tu ,nnlill • �IItRt� �Iltt ,It � � ��wr�w rr w11t1 RR R • A■.w ww,w111111, h'1�l�rw lr 1��, j� ' .1{��■_ "��*r�i,'i,.�r■ ... ':it MINI �I IIl • ', rww �Mll �h �Illl�lq r . �Nl1Uliltlflt11�111►� r r "r a`;Ali ..t, �. �., i ,� • � .Y ."`t . 1 it ' 1• I �,, 1 Lr 14.X � �' s j f y il'r r[ t 't•J[ ar f ,;f". 1 �i ,�i�� ♦ ,+,sir � �4�, L rot ic Xv Aw ME w f ,♦ ,} ff � 1 1 r �•I- � � ♦�♦♦•ice•,�`� s `1 ,4 �•�+♦ �I w c ��`�AEI � ►���, �� �:.. ll �I��� MI off Illow, s ' / 4 ► 1 4. Steeply rolling topography (more than 8 percent) re- quiring significant grading modification. 5. Poor drainage. 6. Small_,and,lor.__irregular shaped lots with fragmented ownership patterns. The advantages that once rendered the Gothard corridor ideal for industrial development have changed significantly over the past several decades. The primary justification for the corridor has traditionally been the accessibility of railroad service. This took precedence over all other Afac- tors and negated the site problems previously discussed. ;^ The County planned the corridor for industrial use at a time i when many manufacturing and wholesaling enterprises cons3d- i erect railroad locations highly appropriate for minimizing costs. This line of thought was maintained by the City when the corridor was anne::ed in the 1950's. However, many modern factories are becoming less railroad-oriented, finding it sufficient to be well served by trucks. :,iarehousing, stor- age, and a few wholesale distributor firms find some advantage to retaining rail access, b-at the tendency in recent years is toward locations well t:irved by truck routes and regional freeway systemF. In recognition of this trend, the City maintained the in- dustrial corridor into the 1960's, when the State proposed to extend the Route 39 Freeway west of Beach Boulevard. The route was later changed to the east side of Beach Boule- vard. The Route 39 Freeway was totally deleted from the State master plan in 1973. Another factor reducing the ! desirability of the Gothard strip was the creation of the A industrial parks in the northern part of the City. Many moderate to marginal sites along the corridor have lost their competitive position as a result. The medium and low quality sites are best suited to warehousing, storage, or other activities that find advantage in close locat;on to i � rail service. The problem exists, however, that the demand for such sites is now low relative to acreage supply and 1 ► will persist in future years. The declining importance of the railroad, the deletion of the Route 39 Freeway, the pressures imposed by competition jy from industrial parks in the City and the rest of the County, and the site disabilities inherent to the corridor will likely produce a slow rate of growth in the foreseeable I future. As a result, consideration should be given to reducing the industrial acreage inventory along the corridor y and/or implementing measures that will improve site suit- ability and attract a greater share of the County's future growth. Afft29 i • The Edison Area has the lowest industrial potential of the three general areas considered. Only B percent of the Edison Area received a high suitability rating, whereas about bl acres, or 79 percent, of the vacant area was rated low. The analysis found the following problems to typify the areas 1. Low fire protection rating. 2. Low grade soils (muck or neat layers present) . 3. Poor drainage. 4. Site work requiring moderate or extensive grading. 5. Distant access to regional freeway systems. The Edison Area will remain dominated by utility develop- ments with only storage, warehousing, and marginal manufac- turing activities compatible on the surrounding vacant industrial properties. The largest vacant M- 1 property (Rotary Mud Dump) is so physically impacted that any type of development could be economically prohibitive. Such on--site problems will place the Edison Area at a considerable disadvantage relative to the more favorable areas in the Huntington Industrial Park and along the Central Industrial Corridor. Consequently, if consideration is given to reducing excess industrial acreage in the City, vacant par- cels in the Edison Area should receive the highest priority. c► w 30 •-y inventory is highly suited to industrial development. Only 669 acres or 66 percent of the potential space surveyed received a high rating. The remaining one-third was rated moderate to low. Much of th-- medium and low grade land would not be competitive with higher quality sites in the City and in the rest of Orange County. Such sites would remain industrially undevelopable in the long-run until r'9 prime sites areawide were exhausted. Marginal sites might attract compatible industry in the short-run. However, by evidence of existing industries along the Gothard corridor and in the Edison area, these firms would not be important employment and City income generators, nor would they be aesthetically pleasing. The City must continue present industrial encouragement actions to insure that �+► Huntington Beach attracts its projected share of Orange County' s future growth. The City should become more vigorously involved in industrial promotion if it desires to capture a share of the region's growth beyond that, projected (and hence to expand the pro- jected land requirement) . Measures should be directed at upgrading the attractiveness of medium and low quality sites, enhancing ►'� railroad locations, and holding land for long-range development. The Central Industrial Corridor should be the prime focus of such activity (refer to Section 4. 6) . If additional effort fails to expand the City's industrial po- tential, consideration should be given to reducing a portion of the ^+ excess industrial space. Several methods are suggested: 1. Industrial land can be reduced through General Plan amendment and rezoning to non-related uses. Selectivity of .sites to be eliminated should reflect a prioritized list of general sub- areas (refer to Sections 4. 6 and 4.7) and individual site evaluation determined from the suitability analysis. The suit- ability analysis and regional perspective should be periodic- ally reviewed to maintain consistency with possible changes in site conditions and land requirements. It is thus not necessary for an immediate bulk reduction of industrial space. Each site should be evaluated as General Plan amend}Went and rezoning requests arise; if development applications consistently pro- pose marginal industrial activities; or if efforts to enhance the quality of low and medium range sites continually fail. 2. Another method of reducing acreage, while simultaneously en- hancing the attractiveness of industrial land, is to permit greater flexibility in mixed use development. Planned unit developments should be allowed in which industrial uses are mixed with support business, commercial retail, and/or office profe3sional space. The City zoning code currently permits 25 percent of building floor space in ancillary commercial uses. The scope of support or related uses should be expanded while 0 allowing 50 percent of total Floor area in such uses. This recommendation could apply areawide or be restricted to sites that have been difficult to develop. . . __......._... Ai 4. 5 Huntington Industrial Park Area A The Huntington Industrial Park Area ccntains 74 percent of the City's vacant prime industrial land, and is capable of meeting 73 percent of the future land requirement. In addition to the site advantages in the large park format, it offers a centralized lo- cation for the City'a industrial base and minimizes conflict with non-related uses. This area should thus be the major focus of industrial encouragement. 4. 6 Central Industrial Corridor The Central Industrial Corridor possesses sufficient high and moderate quality sites to meet the remainder the City' s future land requirement. However, the major conditions on which the corridor's existence was originally based (rail service and the Route 39 Freeway) have significantly diminished its attractive value, leaving little justification for retaining the excess acre- age supply. The attractiveness of the corridor is further reduced w by its decentralized nature, physical site and ownership prrblems, and the encroachment of residential and open space park uses into the industrial areas. Before acreage is reduced, however, 'he City should implement measures to expand the area's potential. 1. The City should promote small industrial parks (similar to those in the corridor north of Heil Avenue) or planned unit develop- ments on the best high and medium quality sites. Mixed use developments could be applied to problem areas as well. These might include small lot subdivisions where non-conforming resi- dential development has been dominant for many years. Mixed use development would permit small businessmen to live and 04 work at the same establishment. 2. Efforts should be directed at upgrading the suitability of all sites. Some average and marginal sites are characterized by multiple owned small lots while others have poor traffic and utility access. An attempt should be made to organize properly owners within the small lot areas to formulate a plan for con- solidation. If this is unworkable, the City should become active in lot consolidation by implementing the provisions of the 1968 Master Plan of Non-Structural Blight. Landlocked parcels could be upgraded by precise planning of street align- ments. The City should further insure that parcels have suit- able access to roads, utilities, and drainage facilities, either through formation of an assessment district or by providing a greater share of funds from the capital improvements program to industrial land. N 34 w I i i i 3. Although the supply of railroad-oriented properties currently 1 exceeds industrial demand, the City and other local pro- motional organizations should work in close cooperation with Southern Pacific Railroad to attract industry. In some areas, railroads have created industrial development departments to survey areas along their lines and work with communities to attract industries requiring rail frontage. The railroads' A purpose centers on increasing activity along their lines in order to increase the volume of freight traffic to be handled. 4. To maximize the use of the best sites along the corridor, further encroachment of marginal industrial developments, open storage facilities, and junk yards should be prohibited. In the long-term, an industrial area with high quality development and environmental standards would become a sealing point for further industrial expansion. 5. If land is retained for quality development, the individual landowner may find that he cannot afford to hold potential industrial land as a long-term investment. The City should help organize a development corporation, an industrial foundation, or some other group of businessmen to purchase and hold the land until it is needed. Another alternative focures on the City permitting interim uses that would hold the site for long-term development yet would provide some economic return and minimize the intensity of use until needed. Such uses might include agriculture (cultivation) , nurseries, greenhouses, etc. 6. if measures fail to upgrade sines or fail to attract quality n industry, consideration should be given to reducing some of the excess land capacity. Sites within the following general areas of the corridor are recommended by order of priority. (total developed and vacant acreage within the areas included) : A. Sites south of Ellis Avenue and north of Clay Avenue. 1a Developed: 37.4 Acres. Vacant and Non-Conforming: 135.E Acres. B. Sites west of Gothard Street between Warner Avenue and Ellis Avenue. Developed: 70.9 Acres. Vacant and Non- Conforming: 25. 9 Acres. i C. Sites along the north side of Taylor Drive east of the railroad right-of-way. Developed: 9.6 Acres. Vacant and Non-Conforming: 25.6 Acres. H 35 U 'I IO D. Sites bounded by Warner Avenue on the north, the railroad tracks on the east, the south boundary of the Ocean View High School site, and Gothard Street on the west. obi Developed: 4.4 Acres. Vacant and Von-Conforminn: 15. 6 Acres. i E. Sites east of Gothard Street between Slater Avenue and Talbert Avenue. Developed: 39.4 Acres. Vacant and Non-- Conforming: 75. 8 Acres. F. Other sites east of Gothard Street between Talbert Avenue and Ellis Avenue. Developed: 8.4 Acres. Vacant and Non-- Conforming: 54. 5 Acres. G. Other sites east of Gothard Street between Warner Avenue A and Slater Avenue. Developed: 28. 4 Acres. Vacant and Non-Conforming: 31.2 Acres. H. Sites north of Warner Avenue. Developed: 48.7 Acres. Vacant and Non-Conforming: 83.2 Acres. A 4.7 Edison Area The Edison area is dominated by public utilities. Only a small fraction of the land is available for general industry, most of which is moderate or low in suitability with a long-term development potential. With the exception of several small parcels adjacent to the Edison plant, all sites north and east of the Orange County Flood Control District DO1 Channel should be phased out of the industrial land inventory. M 36 1 I i APPENDIX i I I i 1975 VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE STUDY i EVALUATION CRITERIA I Z. Physcial 1. Transportation a. Arterial Street Circulation (existing and proposed) 5 - Parcel bordered by at least a primary arterial. ! 4 - Parcel bordered by a secondary arterial. t 3 - Parcel within 4 mile of at least a primary arterial. 2 - Parcel within k mile of a secondary arterial. 1 - Property is within 4 mile of at least a primary arterial ' but poor local road system exists. t b. Rail Access 5 - Parcel borders rail service. 4 - Parcel less than 600 feet from rail service. 3 - Parcel b:..,tween 600 feet and h mil,:.- from rail service. 2 - Parcel between h and mile from rail service. • 1 - Parcel greater than mile from rail service. e. Truck Routes (existing and proposed) 5 - Parcel borders truck route. 4 - Parcel less than h mile from truck route. • 3 - Parcel between 4 mile and h mile from truck route. 2 - Parcel between I and mile from truck route. 1 - Parcel greater than one mile from truck route. 2. Fire Protection • 5 - Rating of 1-2 4 - Rating of 3-4 3 - Rating of 5-6 2 - Rating of 7-8 1 - Rating of 9-10 • NOTE: The fire rating for the City is determined by tie Insurance Service office grading (1970), the city received an overall grading of three (3) , which is considered to be very good for a city of this size. However, some areas of the City have a rating of nine (9) based on a lack of . adequate water supply For fire fighting, specifically water mains and fire hydrants. Considering that as these areas become developed, water main and fire hydrants will have to be provided, a fire rating of three (3) can be applied. Therefore, a fire rating of three (3) is 38 given to all properties within the study area. r + 1 3. Adjacent Land Use Existing 5 - Parcel is surrounded by industrial uses. 4 - Parcel is surrounded by vacant land. 3 - Parcel abuts non conforming use on one side. 2 - Parcel is in an area of mixed uses encroaching into the �I industrial area. 1 - Parcel is surrounded by non conforming uses. ! I Proposed # i 5 - Parcel is surrounded by industrially designated property. w 4 - Parcel is within a holding area or planning reserve. l 3 - Parcel abuts non conforming use on one side. 2 - Parcel abuts non conforming uses on two side.. 1 - parcel is surrounded by non conforming uses 4. Accessibilit;+ to Utilities a. Water 5 - Property fronts existing water mains sized to accommodate 4 - Property is located within 300 feet of water main 3 - Property located between 300 feet to 700 feet of water main 2 - Property between 700 to 1000 feet of water main 1 - Property is beyond a mile from water main b. Sewer 5 - Property fronts existing sewer main size to accommodata 4 - Property is located within 300 feet of sewer twain 3 -- Property is located between 300 to 700 feet of sewer maia 2 - Property is located between 700 to 1000 feet of sewer main 1 - Property is beyond a tt mile from sewer main c. Electricity All sites were considered fully serviceable (5 rating) S. Physical Features a. Soils The following criteria was used in evaluating soil character- istics within the study area that were most relevant to Industrial building and construction. A. Density of upper soils layers B. Expansiveness of the surface soil C. Load bearing capacity of the upper soil strata 39 • _ 7 /9 D. Consc) ` .ation or settlement potential of soil strata Apply' - ; the above criteria, the general area north of Warne Avenue to Edinger was rated "fair to poor" (3 and 2 rati 4) and the parcels south of Warner to Garfield were A rat► i "good." (4 rating) b. Tod graphy 5 - 0-46 Slope (relatively flat) 4 - 5-88 Slope 3 - 9-12% Slope 2 - 13-16% Slope 1 - 171-Above slope (hilly and rough terrain) c. Drainage 00 3 - Good: only minor site work 2 - Fair: temporary drainage problems 1 - Poor: standing water most of year d. Size 4. meets minimum standards 3. substandard lot however adjacent property under same ownership 2. substandard and may be consolidated 1. substandard with weak potential to be consolidated e. Street Frontago S. 100+ 4. 75-100 3. 50-75 2. 25-50 1. 1-25 6. Site Work Required a. Grading h 3. miiimal 2. moderate 1. extensive h. Removal of Structures Gf 4. no structures 3. minor removal of miscellaneous items (fencing, junk) 2. minor demolition of larger items such as oil well, tanks, piping, small structures, trees. 1. extensive demolition and removal of major structures 40 w i 1975 VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND USE STUDY r'4 Parcel No. Net Acreage s Site Location 04 SDM Final Rating I II 'I ry I. Physical 1. Transportation A. Arterial Street Circulation: Rxisting fa Proposed b. Rail Access _ p c. Truck Route Access �..�._.._,.._ D Z. Fire Protection 3. Compatibility of Adjacnet Land Use Existing Proposed h 4. Accessibility to Utilities a. water ., .i b. Bawer c. Electricity 5. Physical Features a. Soil 1 b. Topography c. Drainage d. Size 1 e. Street Frontage 4 41 ' A 6. Site Work nequired a. Grading b. Removal of Structures A Total II. Economic A 1. Assessed valuation per acre 2. Dra ni age Fee Cost Per Acre Total 06 A i A II Q 42 i A i . J J r .. !4 i ♦� i huntington beach planning department 1 r ABSTRACT The objective of this report is to provide specific recommendations concerning the disposition of industrial land in Huntington Beach. r The study presents two alternative ]and use plans that reflect the direction set at the September, 197u, joint study session of the City Council and Planning Commission to reduce the industrial land inventory. It also includes a revised industrial land suitability analysis, revenues/expenditure comparison of land uses over time, and a property owner survey. Alternative #1 separates the Central Industrial Corridor into two major districts and eliminates considerable acreage from the corridor south of Slater Avenue and in the Seacliff and Edison areas. It ansumes that the City perceives a vital role for industry in the com- munity and that it will encourage new development to the fullest • measure. About 733 acres are retained for future development, exceed- ing projected land needs by eight percent. Approximately 576 acres are deleted from the industrial inventory of which 337 acres would require General Plan amendment. City commitment to industrial pro- motion would total about $1,300,000 for capital improvements and advertising only. Compatibility would primarily be improved with • Central Park and with planned residential uses in the southern corri- dor. However, approximately 08 acres of non-conforming industrial uses would be created in the interim period of transition. Alternative #2 maintains the Central Industrial Corridor from Edinger to warner Avenues, but divides it into a number of small districts below Warner Avenue. Considerable area is also removed from the 40 Seacliff and Edison areas. This alternative assumes the primacy of the City's residential character in future courses of action. Alternative #2 provides 636 acres for future industrial development, falling short of the projected land requirement by six percent. About 693 acres are removed from the industrial inventory of which 434 acres would require General Plan amendment. City commitment in the form of advertising and capital improvements would total $1,000,000. The additional land reductions north of Slater Avenue improves compati- bility around Central Park and Ocean View High School. During the interim, however, approximately 120 acres of non-conforming industrial uses would be created. • Atft • i • • TABLE OF CONTENTS i Section Title Page ABSTRACT i 1. 0 GENERAL BACKGROUND 1 • 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS 3 2.1 Potential Indusatrial Sites 3 2.2 Suitability of Industrial Sites 4 3.0 INnUSTRIAL LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 7 3.1 Role of Industry in Huntington Beach 7 i 3.2 Alternative #1 9 3.3 Alternative #2 11 3.4 Property Owner Questionnaire 12 APPENDIX 15 i ii I � i li �I � A �• I • w i TABLE OF FIGURES Number Title page 2-1A Site Suitability for Industrial Development: Huntington Industrial Park Area 2-1B Site Suitability for Industrial Development: Central Industrial Corridor i 2-1C Site Suitability for Industrial Development: Seacliff Area and Edison Area 3-1A Alternative #1: Central Industrial Corridor 3-1B Alternative #1: Seacliff Area and Edison Area 3-2A Alternative 12: Central Industrial Corridor 3-2B Alternative #2: Seacliff Area and Edison Area i • :4 Sr .y i O r 1 ELL • i � i i 1.0 GENERAL BACKGROUND i The disposition of industrial land and the impact of industrial development maor issues in Huntington on the local economy g Y j have been � Beach for many years. For the past several yer.rs pressures have increased to rezone industrial property to other uses along the Gothard-Southern Pacific Corridor. Discretionary bodies, however, • have been reluctant to allow such changes because of the desire to expand the City's economic base and increase municipal revenues through industrial development. The Industrial Land Use Study emerged from a request of the City Council and Planning Commission to conduct a systematic analysis of industrial land to ascertain present and future needs. • Part 1 of the study was completed in June, 1976. The analysis revealed that the City would have an over-supply of industrial acreage relative to projected needs through the year 2000. The study also indicated that much of the vacant land was not well suited to indus- trial use, and that the City was not maximizing benefits due to long- • term vacancy potentials or the encroachment of low revenue generating marginal industries. The study recommended various measures to improve marketability but indicated that implementation did not Adbk 1. • 1 n r � quarantee full success. As a result, broad guidelines were suggested for reducing industrial acreage, primarily in the Central Industrial Corridor and the Edison Area. Subsequent recommendations to the City Council and Planning Commission have focused on the corridor area. In September, three alternative land use plans were submitted in joint study session: one plan suggested no change, while the other two provided for considerable A acreage reductions. The City Council and Planning Commission ' supported a variation of the two land reduction alternatives. The Planning Staff was directed to develop an industrial land plan that maximized the advantages of these alternatives, i.e. , providing enough land to meet the projected land requirement, retaining the best sites, maxirsizing land use compatibility, and minimizing the * E existence of non-conforming uses. , The Staff's industrial land use recommendations are included in this report. Also included are a revised industrial land suitaljility analysis, a comparison of projected net revenues/expenditures gener- ated by industrial and non-industrial uses, and an industrial owner IM 1 Poll concerning intentions for development and perceived problems. These items were also requested at the September joint study session. A9*X lop i U G. . Ali r i • I i t i Y 2.0 METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS • The study proceeds from an identification potential landsrequire- for future industrial development to an estimate ments for the City through the year 2000. Land needs are then measured against thesuitability e f potential sites for development to derive two industrial i 2. 1 Potential Industrial Sites e was The amount of land available for futureTindushe trial industrialninven- revised for purposes of the analysis tory totals approximately 2045 acres, of which 1,404 acres are • considered available to meet future land needs. A parcel was Jor general planned allocated for future use if it is now zoned and for industry. The only exception to this rule is that portion of. the Gothard Strip between Garfield and Clay Avenues, which is designated medium density re sidential by the General Plan. This area was in- cluded because re its transitional nature and the problems that must of i be confronted in changing land uses to a non-conforming character. A parcel was also available fr fiJses are considered e industrial use recyclable if currently vacant or recyclable. L3. i r r " they are non-conforming, oil-related, or primarily open storage. About 1,184 acres (84 percent) are vacant or in oil production, and 220 acres (17 percent) are recyclable. Measured against the City' s projected land requirement of 677 acres yields a net over-supply of industrial land amounting to 727 acres. It: should be pointed out that Huntington Beach will capture its share of projected regional demane� only if the City makes a maximum commitment of resources to t:hi. objective and implements the measures recommended in Part 1 of the Industrial Land Use Study. 2.2 Suitability of Industrial Sites Site evaluation procedures were refined to more accurately reflect the significance of various locational criteria and site considerations. y The revised industrial land suitability criteria and weightings appear in the appendix of this report. The most important change was to introduce criteria comparable on a regional basis. The highest point allocations within the various categories often reflect the conditions prevalent at the best industrial sites in orange County, including the ` • Irvine Complex, Northeast Anaheim, the funtington Industrial Park Area, and others. As a result, the overall ratings of potential j sites in Huntington Beach more closely appronimate their competitive } position within the County as well as tt�e City. . As before, the study is intentionally not oriented to those firms that find advantage at rail locations or on physically marginal land because of the poor revenue/expenditure balance that such uses gener- ate to the City. In general, however, the criteria and weightings attempt to balance the advantages and problems perceived by the developer/firm and the City. The site analysis is partially based on the industrial user' s cost structure and a prioritization of area . advantages as revealed in various industrial surveys throughout the County. At the same time, the criteria and their importance reflect the City` s concerns of attracting viable industry, while identifying problem areas requiring public expenditure. Potential industrial sites were evaluated according to the following i criteria: 1. Transportation access and Exposure, including vehicular (freeway and arterial) and rail. 2. Site recycle capability and compatibility with surrounding land uses. 3. Access to public utilities and municipal services. 4. Character of physical features, including topography, soils, and drainage. 4. AM& i V' _ .7 1 i 5. Parcel size, shape, and frontage; degree: of ownership consolida- tion. 6. Economic factors, including land values and tax rates. The study evaluated 1,404 acres of available acreage to three ranges of suitability for industrial development: high, medium, and low. • Instead of rating each individual lot, the potential acreages war divided into 57 study sites. Lots were combined to form a single large site where some basis of homogeneity (ownership, physical features, lot size, existing use, or zoning) or barrier separation (arterials, railroad, drainage channels, etc. ) could be determined. The results of the industrial land suitability analysis fallow and are i depicted in Figure 2-1: High Medium Low Total Vacant Foe cle Vacant ntgycle Vacant cle Huntington Industrial 467.7 431.3 0 36.4 0 0 0 41 Park Area Central Industrial 720.8 25.0 9.6 177.0 85.2 347.1 76.9 Corridor • 5eacliff Area 114.0 0 0 0 0 94.0 20.0 Edison Area 101.8 0 0 0 0 73.1 28.7 Subtotal 456.3 9.6 213.4 85.2 514.2 125.6 Total 1,404.3 465.9 298.6 639.8 ; i , ; 1 The suitability study rated approximately 456 acres as prime land for industrial development. Most of the prime space is concentrated in : { the Huntington Industrial Park Area. The Central Industrial Corridor contains only 35 acres or seven percent of the highest quality Indus- trial area, all of which is located between Edinger Avenue and Warner Avenue. In contrast, the corridor accounts for 88 percent of the moderate and 66 percent of the low rated acreage. Moderate quality sites intersperse with low quality sites from Warner Avenue to Clay Avenue. The poorest sites are concentrated in the area between Slater Avenue and Talbert Avenue, and in the southern corridor below i Ellis Avenue. The remaining 216 acres in the Seacliff and Edison Areas were also rated poor. s i 5. • I i y� r'. •,l�•, 1�•��l l �.-:—!al � !1' 1 � 1�' •i r—,rj` i� �?� ,••av'1. CF—E: • ,�, �I7`4aLtTc. ' 1� .r. LEGEND HIGH MEDIUM ' i !OW . # I , I . • � j m A BOLSA 1�pfli� M fI f 1 1 I F -�+ � 1 1 1 1 'T•Y•�V MC FADDEN- - ---— I _ MC t I.1 • • fA0( CF-C - - II .I• :nAL ». # c�INK s `F" r 1 I 1 Y HUNIoNGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA SITE SUITABILITY FOR lap P"NNING DEPARTMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT HUNTINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA' 1 il i ........... .. _ In t 7: _Q I i�---� _f ul, YI ac I r Z +..,. ;i ' ir• i 3l j. :�. !1, t i� 1 ` I 11 "so • t i,t+l+ ••� t �: � I' �� .�. ..... . .au, Er t -..+ pif,. `, rl^00.i• ?y. UI ,om �`�'.' ';Ii's J Ill T• :Sii I� I Il "Il jl Its I ! a 1r.E ill at _ ► ; I I ! {' Ih.•• 1•. '. N' ' • ' l ��'t':1' I '_, I . ��'.,,' ►� , , It ` r �r�r I+i•�!' �.,.If.Sr.R • " 1 •,� f t't f- .RI.'-'.. , ^"�..i � _ 1w'..• 1..�..:1,.t...•�i INW f� /.•`p�rw '/"1i lifi. 't.'illi{I �~ f ' .� ' I! HEIL �'I,,,. ... :i;:. PW ', l .��..,, I,i i, , 1. �•�' t Lt wrr:; :,,::: ± j �?. ( 'i ++• r. I Ft),��r .t ,...•t �w M tiLA_� ,(_ { :ra,':,.��1, 1���'� . . 1 1 II� �I 1 �� '• 1 '1� is �(�lL:\ at .� ( Y-.l I• { '�I' '� t �++•.:r i •J•r)+.'t. Cr•a ll + i�•'^' I !' " I,/I Cr E i I1s�, "�•'��;• . Ir 'T� '.r•��_±� .i_Ii,.r,r._ r�+�v...111iI ��j �, � %.«.I .: ... ,,���.� [i,i�;1"/�' i{A _• , r - •+ 3r+r.....� it . .. :1 r. P',. .w,`w::! J1 L 41W R ER J. cr'! i 'n•*!Lrf ��� ,l �II �. i �• .�If,�� �I CC.. I-- ! .I 1y�+ .1: .•i. ', ,. Il..;+ Its• _ •} �.I Cf�E j jti � f) •.r• /"tS,' �'' � ....'�"� I�� ;i• t 'S..�i�.' il:ii:, MJ�/ fur • �Ir. .,,.. 1 i J'i' rl►Il�!IJ; :, u I I is( w;: I r• I I - '';u�l' ;ii•!� �Jf,ij: � cnr. ��'•i+,' I ! c....� .I;. .,, `I:l; ( •�,r?'►� yr.i �:t,,l,,,#r ' tl I .r;l Cr�C � I ' ,� :�. �..., :'��i��+•��•••��J ' '�'�"' ' �si�i'llil!?ij?I;�I r.::;:'i i� ,�I; �' i II �. 1•Ii„� t _:... .r. _1.,..tl..liU�l, +r,'ttl:.., ♦ c,l .�In•.flJ. I �.�1 N •�.•.�; � '�• }'�. '�:�.�.� c L/�+� p 7fltl ! yr•I{i; ,{e!•.11 itt I 'tray "�rr'rc ' S t �. Jltil Erb r t}il •,1111 ( ,wia�_�'::.li 1 J .! !.• �Lri i � Ir'f�1 I ' .��{�.I�' '1�I ; :�. . , � � I� >�-_-_—;t:•f , r�j( ..Hj';t�t I I.t�#ljlrj I f`-Y`i�i t .•' `:,..� « A 7IiII • t�'il;il;1; t�,L''I(±iiiiiiilii �l�i� �{'I' 1, � .;,,;�_ •-„�It� �� (Ii' I(r`�tii;!►f,u�/ •n„(!fE?Ili;li"??I��•t�..,I���i Er'N .. `� ----;•=�-�` i �� � j I� I 1 •• rr'E I �LJa�tl _ '�. no-! ri: ELLI ZT. - CARFIELD LEGENDIL J w•-. r, • ,. v•1 , .ii HIGH MEDIUM1/ _' [� tow T" - 1600' •`, �. . ! , �,.. � :� YORKTOyVN. j� Aftk 151 HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA SITE SUITABILITY FOR Pllll`"HING DEPARTMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT -CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR r s �i RFIEID IN •�.f , i if J.r L: i +�e OH it i. raw cl cr•c c , Ilk EEFr LEGEND �'//.� �) ��ffj✓ ... ( r ICI HIGH C[' d MEDIUM LOW SEACLIFF AREA 1" = 1600' . � � , ... ; ,fin. L.. � �:. ., -�:::k• 11 _: 1 :�: !' . :�::1;•.r,.J�` — -�_ ._ �'! _ i_ LANTA" OQ .•4-t-« .•ff•.• www, —.J�r .. .•'� jli fix, ` •t .n 14 MIlTi�N do 17 LEGEND C. 0 HIGHsjfj ;!} .,` �.'•q '•. Gym 'nR MEDIUM •. K LOW � I �i7J I' •EDISON AREA 1" = 1600' HUVTINGTON BWCH CALIFORNIA SITE SUITABILITY FOR PUNNING DEPARTMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT s • '. y 3. 0 INDUSTRIAL LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 3.1 Role of Industry in Huntington Beach In formulating an industrial land use plan, the role of industry in a city like Huntington Beach as well as site suitability must be considered. Many suburban com.nunities have traditionally accepted � the assifTintion of seeking and encouraging industrial development f based upon its beneficial effects, i.e. , the creation of new jobs and ancillary investments, the generation of municipal and school revenues, and the reduction of the tax burden on local residents. Few, however, have ever questioned the validity of this assumption. As a bedroom community within the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, the desirability of encouraging and maintaining a large indus- trial base in Huntington Beach must be seriously examined. Huntington Beach is primarily a middle and upper income residential community, most of whose residents work in areas outside the City limits that have achieved scale-economies or competitive advantage in a diversity of employment activities. The coastal and climatic amenities continue to make Huntington Beach a more desirable place to Live than work, and people will pay the high prices of homes to 7 • A r locate here and work elsewhere. The City has attracted a reasonablJe share of industrial growth over the past decade and will continue However, the over-supply of industrial len to do so in the future. potential and the: encroachas created problems of lorgg-term vacancy p as well ment of many marginal industrial users. Most new industry that moving from other locations ill the Los Angeleslomerations (�ueit more efficient tolocate in lathe industrial aggAnaheim, etc.) rather than compete with gvalue residen Irvine, poor quality sites in Huntington h. users for moderate or p trial Encouraging the development of ans xcetialecharacteri has sproduced se indus- in the face of the community ttraction of marginal ^I • other adverse effects on the City. The valued residential and park trial uses and their disharmony J developments is most obvious. Less so is the fact that the jobs created are de oflHuntington low or oBeacheandge.spendsthei.rsulto disposable income ;I reside outside o great extent with in other communitiea�Ve�nimentsoliked those� in°the Huntington Indus- A quality industrial P are not geared to the trial Park Area. most rhomes ial built rkers-inIfhthe City is truly committed incomes of most inductarage to extensive industrial developmem�ximizeit athest at talnbenefitssOff�c sufficient low cost housing construction to i industry. Industrial activity also prr,rides little benefit to middle �( and upper Income residents Beachwork do not susually offer ide the City lsignificant 1 jobs created in Hun g -economic positions or substantial relief improvement of their socia of local tax burdens. the Ci.ty' s standpoint, the 1976 Revenue Ex enditure Anal sic of �. From in ustr al uses do not have a Land Uses has shown that most existing indirect significant fiscal impact an municipal revenues. most indirect property , rue sales tax revenues usualp acreothancmanytresidentio the al categories. tax revenues are lower p_ The City also foregoes revenue if industrial land teft vacagilds indefinitely versus permitting residentiallo mopmenen with high t y higher property tax revenues and attracts populations This conclusion is based on a g disposable incomes. industrial and analysis of revenues and expenditures generated by ; residential uses. The following table summarizes the cumulative net balance per acre to the City in 1990. it assumes various uses of industrial land over a 13 year period. Data is derived from the b' 1976 Reverru,a/Expendreenerah�asbYfnew Land constructionsin adjusted the costs and revenuesg resi- dential and industrial categories. 8. II i 1 0 Cumulative Net Gain or Use of Industrial Land Loss per Acre to the City 1990 1. Develop Single Family Residential $ 2, 890 Immediately 2. Develop Medium Density Residential 6,184 after being vacant for 5 years 3. Develop Quality Industry Immediately 3,267 4. Develop Quality Industry after being 912 vacant for 5 years 5. Develop Quality Industry after. being - 1,443 vacant for 10 years 6. Open Storage for 5 Years then 932 develop Quality Industry 7. Open Storage for 10 years then - 2,323 develop Quality Industry The foregoing discussion should not imply that industry is bad for the City, but that it be placed in proper perspective so that policies can be formulated that apply to Huntington Beach. It suggests that the City is not maximizing the use of its industrial acreage. The industrial land inventory should be reduced. However, sufficient acreage should be retained to approximate the City's capability to attract its share of regional industrial demand. This means main- taining the Huntington Industrial Park Area as the focus for future development, and the best sites in the Central Industrial Corridor that promise relatively short-term quality developments. The two alternatives presented in this report generally meet these require- ments. 3.2 Alternative #1 Alternative #1 separates the Central Industrial Corridor into two distinct districts. Considerable acreage is removed from the 40 corridor south of Slater Avenue as well as the Seacliff and Edison Areas. It assumes that the City perceives a vital role for industry in the community and that it will undertake the measures necessary to attract the projected share of County demand. Alternative #1 was derived by ranking all potential sites according to suitability score, and retaining the highest rated sites to a level that s roxi- mated the future industrial land requirement. As a result, '733 pacres are maintained for future development, exceeding b eight � 9 projected Land needs y 9 percent. About 650 acres are vacant �ind 83 acres are co 1 sidered recyclable. In addition to providing sufficient acreage to A92tk 1 ���.-5.�.. ... ..., ... .ti.r ... .. ... .. ._ .. ,.. .. .. .. .. _ ... _ .._._.. .... . .r••.rw rw.:N....N r. a..r I f.r.VM ilr.l M meet future needs, the highest quality sites are retained. Approxi- ' mat Ay 64 percent of the acreage received a high suitability rating, $% ' 31 percent was moderate, and 5 percent was rated low. Alternative #1 removes 596 acres from the industrial inventory. As shown in Figure 3-1, most changes occur between Slater Avenue and Talbert Avenue and south of Ellis Avenue in the Central Industrial Corridor; and in the Seacliff and Edison Areas. About 337 acres , would require General Plan amendment and zone change, while 259 acres would require zone change only. Six acres occupied by the Cambro Manufacturing Company would require General Plan amendment to reflect existing and long-term use. In addition, the special study area (75 acres) between Garfield Avenue and Clay Avenue west of the rail- road right-of-way would retain its existing residential General Plan designation. The extent of commitment by the City would total approximately l $1, 300,000 for capital improvements and industrial advertising. In addition, staff support would be necessary for precise street align- ments, industrial ordinance revision, coordination with the Orange County Transit District, and ,gmall to-t. reagyeZopment. In the case of small lot redevelopment, however, the commitment is minimal because the major problem areas are removed from industrial designation. Alternative #1 also provides land use compatibility over the long- term in the central and southern portions of the corridor. compati- bility would primarily be improved with Central Park in th-: central corridor and with planned residential uses in the southern sector below Ellis Avenue. Certain problems are inherent in the implementation of this alterna- tive. Approximately nd acres of non-conforming industrial uses would be created. Most of the estimated industrial land reduction would probably be converted to residential designations, creating interim mixed uses. Short-run residential construction would fill in the vacant areas, but such uses would frequently be mixed with marginal industrial uses having indefinite future tenure. On the other hand, the redesignation of industrial land to residential use could raise land values and hasten the removal of non--conforming industrial uses. Problem areas include the following: 1. Mixed uses at the southeast corner of Slater Avenue and Gothard . Street (6 acres) . Lis derived from Public Works Department current costs for road utility improvements, and Economic Development Office yearly rtising expenditures. 4 1 1 � .11a.� ����•!J!��X:c. �'J;. . ''1.� �,><!nit; � 1t -- -- - . ..' - --.. . 'EDINGER UJI Q...r � Lu uj IL i'r.r �� .«.. •Wi UL !'.'r ��r':�v'.'j(11i r,, •, +_• `I ,. I ~ {' r 1 f �i i "1 1 1�. •. Oli;4.!• Cr j 111 t wa,1 1OW4/,t ».) .�rw • ,r,:, l„ `.. I�at:..- .:-ia --�7r{I �..�.� r �..� ...•r.)))LMIr •rah.• �r li,.~ i�r 1•:r, 'r Li':::.`.:.:.~ EIL t• cr �s �, — '� .•��( -i f 1'•. ,' i�. •rw •� f i••..,+.'..,1t11:.,. ( ari �:a 11r111•'1t\\1.t)?�f ' ' /11r•'1 CrH S. • �• , wr ri I�I•'i� '� w." j) ItMj A.� .• I,IA.w .:A�,�.;i' »I _ 1JIM . .r�• {i l l j l it -• '' `r u.HFlo.. I l r �r� •7 - j _.__.��__. _.__ �au WARNER ��". :i: )�. .Ui�r:Ir.ti,i.� (t+,yf'•r•1 •�I7; i�'R;,•' .`.. Cr E 1 •� Cr E i'..hM', �.f.,,i S. -. .. ' • '• .w..! NT f ! 1 r j.2) 13 r f:r r'►{r! IY w ;, ►!' t■t r.� �•�!!. _r .i '/ ft { I r.n+. �) LEGEND INDUSTRIAL LAND RETAINED INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED REQUIRES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1Z?' AND ZONE CHANGE • ' ' ""` " INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED ,: ;:•:'�C:•:•:;:1 ;,'�j• REQUIRES ZONE CHANGE ONi v ;�;�'�;•;• �. } •.1,.,+'^ t. LN)•,. .r.w I .. . . • ••► ��••.•. •/ LBERT t• ' ram-• ' ; F ass `--t r�r� • •�r•••••••• . • • - a �•• 1 a r9:0 • • • •;•� 1 ,p. 1� Lit .� • • a • r ■ • • • • • • • • a r a�aaaaa 1 a a r 1. { raeararaa°aaa •:•••:•••••::•: ri � •:� 048:8.82rmoamrm i I 1 • • ; 111 GARFIELD JL,..•. . , iiz ire■ arfaarar■ � ' . . try• if ra■aaar /! • i ♦ ( :JI^ _ III Lid '71 IORKTOWN i i HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA ALTERNATIVE 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR _ -7 Cie GARFIELD UJI son a n savings Mas . . � ••mil tf•C rm•m• � ' C►.[ •. :Brow mile• fill • ,` rmrr t !C •� 1 � Wire .. it �� •ti / + rile■ • %f; . � ,� ' r'ra r �� mans l,�/ • .�I ( MS � ���• • ` rmn•r memo / CIF-x 01 r/ SEACLIFF AREA 1" = 1600' MA } �, �'• /�,. n. /1�,<�,�r��"i1 . L.�",.T• 7C1 Cf•t r V • • • •• • • • ►r• t • =77.7 Cf E LEGEND •..,� :y 1 is E 4• �. INDUSTRIAL LAND RETAINED INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED A� i EOUIRES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT �+.` C`,� ;4,l�jC j �, AND ZONE CHANGE '� Cb4sl •, aril` INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED ��'`•yly. .� ' REQUIRE; ZONE CHANGE ONLY f EDISON AREA 1" = 1600' HUNTINGTON BEACH CJII.IKANIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ALTERNATIVE 1 a a 2. Oil. tank farm on the north side of Talbert Avenue w7Talbert Street (15 acres) 3. Auto dismantling/rock quarry on the northeast corne Avenue and Gothard Street (15 acres) . N 4 . Mixed uses bounded by Garfield Avenue on the north, the railroad right-of-way on the east, Clay Avenue on the south and Goldenwest Street on the west (00 acres) . 5. Oil tank farm at the northwest corner of Hamilton Avenue and * Newland Street in the Edison Area (26 acres) . 3. 3 Alternative #2 Alternative #2 maintains the Central Industrial Corridor intact from Edinger to Warner Avenues, but divides it into a number of small i districts below Warner Avenue (Figure 3-2) . The Seacliff Area and most of the Edison Area are also removed from the industrial land inventory. This alternative assumes an important role for industry in the economic and land use mix of the City. Since it calls for a greater land reduction, however, it is even more reflective of an assumption that Huntington Beach is foremost a residential community. As a result, it becomes less i,iiperative that the City allocate land to meet a projected industrial demand and area requirement. The methodology employed to derive Alternative #2 is similar to that used for Alternativ,, #1. However, additional moderate and low rated sites were eliminated along the south side of Slater Avenue, along Gothard Street between Warner and Slater Avenues, and between Goldenwest Street and Crystal Street north of Garfield� Avenue. These changes g were based on the probability of quality industrial development and/or I land use compatibility considerations. Alternative #2 provides 636 acres for future development, falling short of the projected land requirement by six percent. Approximately 604 acres are vacant and 32 acres are recyclable. As in Alternative #1, the best potential sites are retained as well as areas where quality industrial developments now exist. Since more medium rated sites have been dropped from the inventory, the proportion of high quality sites rises to 73 percent. Alternative #2 removes 693 acres from the industrial inventory. Extensive changes occur between Warner and Talbert Avenues and south of Ellis Avenue in the Central Industrial Corridor; and in the Seacliff and Edison Areas. Approximately 434 acres would require General Plan arendment and zone change, while 259 acres would require zone change only, Again the Cambro .site would require General Plan amendment to light industrial, whila the area between Garfield and 11. and Clay Avenues west of the railroad tracks would retain the exist-- irg residential designation. The City commitment to .industrial encouragement would be slightly less than for Alternative #1 . Capital improvement ind advertising total about $1, OOO, 000. Staff time would also be required for ordinance revision, precise plans, and coordination with the Orange County Transit District. Alternative #2 removes two smAJ-1 lot areas: one located a Warner and Gotham, and the other at Slater and G to hard. It also provitas a higher degree of long-term land use compatibility from Warner Avenue to Clay Avenue. The additional land reductions improve compatibility primarily around Central Park and Ocean View High School. � Similar to Alternative #1, this proposal creates nonconforming and mixed uses over the interim period of transition. Approximately 120 acres of existing industrial development would become non-conformina. Again, short-run residential construction would produce mixed land use patterns. By increasing the scope of the total industrial land r+ reduction, however, increasedland values could hasten the removal of non-conforining industrial uses of a marginal nature, even more so j than under Alternative #1. Specific problem areas would include the five listed under Alternative #1, Additional areas would include: I. Mixed uses at the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Gothara i Street (20 acres) . 2. Mixed uses at the northeast corner of Slater Avenue and Gothard Street (10 acres) . 3. Oil extraction/equipment storage and miscellaneous open storage area bounded by Ernest Street on the north, Crystal. Street on the east, Gariield Avenue on the south, and Goldenwest Street on the west (33 acres) . • r 3. 4 Property Owner Questionnaire Input from industrial property owners was requested at the September joint study session. The Planning Department polled all property owners in the Central Industrial Corridor and Edison Area to solicit , their intentions for development and obstacles they perceive to industrial development. Approximately 75 percent of the ou-ners responded. The results are summarized in the following tables: 2. Sr, 1 � 1l.� _ 1.�1��l�I,R}±�'� .i � 1-�'���r'i���:�� , l . ._ � .• -- �DIfVG�_R J I '... (�..r ' .•r V1� 1�� rl1Lit Lu � , 'r.. .>' Iw '.�•1 � � N '{•ial a ,�► � i' {O _ Lu to I 00 .r .� , � t 1 ,�r 1 �1 , ' •«:.''•,� 1-- f .�(� 1'I}j1-�1uC...'•�) T �•� • .•T✓4..1.`......, II_'•'.sl f� r�••.• �. -i 1J1 ,. .��;'I�� •.+r w��.'...t: .::'. I/HEEL �'~R� M �I • � S .,�"1.. ;( �•• •.l i1f....Yl'r rer:.-�...A '� -� I �ir►1� (fN S• .i� t .r,IM r'I "�'� '��� , II� 1 ! • = A.r � �/w:. .-:I..�, . � . M`Eii J•I Ih ��.t �I«ti.•rl/wrrl �1ifr. •,, '.w.l "`;1 • •� i{i'r:'��'..' .' '�-..-s i.•.ri I' cr p 4 :... F I cr.[ ...•.i� ...— - WARNER r .:. :;:; cr•t �• 1;a j LijT ,I U11''1 (t•t •..S.M', ., , C - '• . i �. y � ' try .i !j ��,rir•1 I ,��tf ..... ; 1.�., !.' , I'll • . .• ;.•.� , fll� INIM1ry�r.11=1'� �•..f�f1. ' I':�I• f{ i'1 �!'k:J ••w`;.+�/ ,• f rM.: _ _ r. • X.: LEGEND "' •:':•C';i�•. INDUSTRIAL LAND RETAINED f1r Itq N • ♦ • . (•► :II':►) INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED ;, •••'•:•:•• RCN- x REQUIRES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT cr'p .•:• -1- —u:j .ilt�R AND ZONE CHANGE ''gy[{pp ..•.'.'• '•"Y• •• Y� ~,rrr; I jIit�j ■■■■ INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED ••• :•:.•::•:• i,1 r } REQUIRES ZONE CHANGE ONLY �+h:;:;:;: . •••�•. ` LBERT ELLIS,, ` . . . . . Ogg ■ ■ ■ ! 1k LQ I an aj e■rr■■■■■rcr■■ I i a 1 ► !.a s•..t_ _�'�•.s'�: . • GARFIELD rn 4444 nF ■ ■ •� ItA t•,-, :I :IYO_ RKTOWN j 1 - 1600 # ,, x , 1 • ALTERNi�ii'tiE 2 lop PLANHUNTNINGODEP 86401 MENT4LIrCJrct+iiA CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR , ,GARFIELD Lu IN "1p , •:r� y ;, u r "t 1 ', ••o+;r .��;. �'�// �` ,.,!•.` DAMS opt SEACLIFF AREA 1 16o0' 9�"•c����,��•��:�/i,��/���/�,��/>��`� �. i } III ''• ;; +wn ar'..j,l'r�ii.�... . Y S ?;z' � a, ;f_';;:L';rtrc:,—+t, I 7 _ 'a •"-"�:AYLANTA� rr AMILTON .X 'f I~ 'I" �� ,�) �R.l.�'� I(( r`�,�! ... . .., _ ...._._. •� ill ••••••'••s'.•i••�• 11"6 tip/ LEGEND �•.r i , ,Il INDUSTRIAL LAND RETAINED ?�J INDUSTRIAL LAND DELETED r - REQUIRES GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ti�•�C AND ZONE CHANGE Co4 '• Sl I • r INDWIRIAL LAND DELETED cr•y"<,y4S+,,q�, ,,r� •s REQUIRES ZONE CHANGE ONLYIL •� �� rr EDISON AREA 1" = 1600' i HUNTINGTON BEACH C4lIFORNIA PUNNING DEPARTMENT ALTERNATIL= 2 A A For what use do you believe your property to be most suited? Use Percentage Industrial--Manufacturing and/or Wholesale Trade 158 A Industrial--Stoiage or Oil Related 22% Low Density Residential 11% Medium or High Density Residential 378 Commercial 15% A flow would you rate your property as a potential industrial site? Suitability Rating Percentage High 378 ~ Moderate 21% Low 4 2 t What obstacles impede industrial development of your property and the IA surrounding area? Problem Percentage Transportation Access 128 Land Use Compatibility 30% A Oil Production Encumbrances 88 Ownership Fragmentation 12% Utility Access 1% A Topography, Drainage, Soils 58 City Code Restrictions and Fees 68 Coastal Commission 18 Property Taxes 18 • No Problems 24% The poll generally supports the results of the suitability analysis conducted by the Planning Department. About 63 percent of the owners gave their property a moderate or poor rating, and 76% indicated a variety of problems that has retarded industrial development.. The most significant problem was thought to be the incompatibility of ' industrial uses with nearby residential areas, Central Park, and 13. 1 i vie schools. In the southern portion of the Central Industrial Corrj1d r the conflict of residential development and oil related activiti was ranked most significant. Transportation access, utility acc lot fragmentation, and physical features combined to account forpercent of the responses. Most of the owners who rated their property highly suitable for. industrial use and indicated no serproblems tended to also be owners of industrial businesses at thr' site, in the process of developing the property for industrial use, or involved in small-scale oil leases. in terms of best; use, most owners (48 percent) believed their land to be more suited to residential use than industry. Approximately 37 percent felt that industrial development would be the best use of the area. These were usually owners of existing businesses in the study area or owner: in the process of industrial development. By type of industry, most owners thought that the corridor and Edison Area were most fit for storage of oil operations. Those owners favoring commercial uses were primarily concentrated near the intersection of Warner. and Gothard, and at the intersection of Slater r' ! . and Gothard. 1 E r C e • 0 i APPENDIX gem- lop i i i s J i 9 ��. � o Lug avv INDUSTRIAL LAND SUITAnTLITY CRITERIA Transportation Access and Exposure 22 Freeway 10 Local Circulation - Existing 5 Local Circulation - Proposed 4 ' Railroad 3 Land Use 17 Existing Land Use and Potential Recycle 5 Compatibility of Adjacent Land Uses - Existing 6 Compatibility of Adjacent Land Uses - Proposed 6 Fire Protection Utilities and Municipal Services 17 Fire Protection 3 Water 5 Sewer 5 A Electricity and Gas 4 Physical Features L6 Topography 5 Soils 4 Local Drainage 4 Regional Flood Hazard 3 Lot and Ownership Considerations 10 Size 5 Frontage and Shape 5 Economics 8 Land Value 4 Tax Rate 4 TOTAL 90 At& 17. • J 5 I 1. Transportation Access and Exposure Access to Freeway Tnterchange 10 - Site less than 1 mile from interchange. 9 - Site 1 - 1. 5 miles from interchange. � B - Site 1.5 - 2 miles from interchange. 7 - Site 2 - 2.5 miles from interchange. 6 - Site 2. 5 - 3 miles from interchange. 5 - Site 3 - 3.5 miles from interchange. 4 - Site 3.5 - 4 miles from interchange. 3 - Site 4 - 4.5 miles from interchange. 2 - Site 4.5 - 5 miles from interchange. 1 - Site more than 5 miles from interchange. Local Circulation System - Existing 5 - Site borders fully developed primary arterial. 4 - Site borders fully developed secondary arterial, or local street within an industrial park. i 3 - Site borders primary or secondary arterial, not fully { developed. 2 - Site borders local street with suitable access to arterial system. 1 - Site borders a local street with poor access to arterial system, or is landlocked. Local Circulation System - Proposed 4 - Site will border fully developed primary arterial. 3 - Site will border fully developed secondary arterial, � or local street within an industrial. park. 2 - Site will border local street with suitable access to arterial system. 1 - Site will border local street with poor access to arterial system, or is landlocked. Railroad Access 3 - Site borders primary railroad line. 2 - Site borders secondary railroad line. 1 - Site not bordered by rail service. `. 2. Land Use Existing Land Use and Potential Recycle 5 - Site is vacant. 4 - Site requires removal of non-conforming or marginal in- dustrial uses; value of improvements range from $0 - $2,500/ acre. a. � . i R f i i 3 - Site requires removal of non-conforming or marginal in- dustrial uses; value of improvements range from $2,500 -- $10, 000/acre. 2 - Site requires removal of non-conforming or marginal in- dustrial uses; value of improvements range from $10,000 - $25,000/acre. 1 - Site requires removal of non-conforming or marginal in- � 4 dustrial uses; value of improvements exceeds $25,000/acre. Compatibility of Adjacent Land Use - Existing 6 - Site is surrounded by industrial uses or vacant land. IA 5 - Commercial or office uses abut site on at least one side; remaining sides in industrial uses or vacant. 4 - Residential, open space, or schools abut site on one or two sides with suitable barrier (arterial, railroad, flood control channel) . 3 - Residential, open space, or schools abut site on one or A two sides without suitable barrier. 2 - Site abuts non-conforming uses (other than commercial) on three or four sides with suitable barriers. 1 - Site abuts non-conforming uses (other than commercial) on three or four sides without suitable barriers. W Compatibility of Adjacent Land Use -- Proposed 6 - Site is surrounded by industrially designated property. 5 - Commercial, office, planning reserve or planned community designation abuts site on at le;,st one side; remaining sides are industrially designated. 4 - Residential, open space, or school designation abuts site on one or two sides with suitable barrier. 3 - Residential, open space, or school designation abuts site on one or two sides without suitable barrier.. 2 - Site abuts non-conforming designation (other than com- mercial, planning reserve, and planned community) on three or four sides with suitable barrier. 1 -- Site abuts non-conforming designation (other than com- mercial, planning reserve, and planned community) on three or four sides without suitable barrier. 3. Utilities and Municipal Services • Fire Protection The fare rating for the City is determined by the Insurance Service Office grading system. A poor rating reflects a lack of adequate water supply for fire fighting, specifically water © mains and fire hydrants. Average grade for each site is used. 19. s 1 1 o I ; S 3 - Rating of 1-3 ^ � 2 - Rating of 3-6 1 - Rating of 6-9 Access to Water Utility 5 - Site fronts existing water main sufficient to serve ^ entire area; farthest potential development within 600 feet of main. 4 - Site fronts existing water main sufficient to serve ! ! entire area; farthest potential development beyond 600 feet but less than 1/2 mile of main 3 - Unserviced site located within 600 feet of water, or site fronts main but contains isolated or otherwise unserviced parcels. 2 - Unserviced site located 600 - 1000 feet of water main. 1 - Unserviced site located beyond 1000 feet of water main. i Access to Sewer Utility 5 - Site fronts existing sewer main sufficient to serve entire area; farthest potential development within 400 feet of � . main. 4 - Site fronts existing sewer main sufficient to serve entire area; farthest potential development beyond 400 feet but less than 1/2 mile of main. 3 - Unserviced site located within 400 feet of sewer main, or site fronts main but contains isolated or otherwise unserviced parcels. 2 - Unserviced site located 400 - 700 feet of sewer main. 1 - Unserviced site located beyond 700 feet of sewer main. C , Access to Electrical Utility 2 - Site presently serviced. 1 - Site presently unserviced. C � Access to Natural Gas Utility 2 - Site presently serviced. 1 - Site presently unserviced. 4. Physical Features C Togo rg aphy 5 - Severest slope 0-3 percent 4 - Severest slope 4-7 percent 3 - Severest slope B-11 percent C 20. ►, ft i i 2 - Severest slope 12-15 percent 1 - Severest slope more than 15 percent soils Criteria include: density of upper soil layers; expansiveness ! of surface soils; load bearing capacity of upper soil strata; and consolidation or settlement potential of soil strata. Each site is given an overall rating of excellent, good, fair, or poor based on the average rating applied to each criterion. 4 - Average rating excellent. ! 3 - Average rating good. 2 - Average rating fair 1 - Average rating poor Local Drainage A 4 - Excellent: no drainage problems with only minor grade modifications reuuired. 3 - Good: 75 percent of site without drainage pztzl�lems; re- maining area requires moderate site work or public drain- age facilities. 2 - Fair: 50 percent of site without drainage problems; • remaining area requires moderate site work or public drainage facilities. 1 - Poor: less than 50 percent of site without drainage problems; remaining area requires moderate site work or public drainage facilities. �1 Regional Flood Hazard 3 - Site is outside the regional flood hazard area defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2 - Site is partially in regional Flood hazard area. 1 - Site is totally within the regional flood hazard area. 5. Lot and Ownership Considerations Size 5 - Site is a single parcel or group of parcels under one ! ownership containing 10 acres or more; and individual lots meet a minimum standard of 15,000 square feet. 4 - Site is a single parcel or group of parcels under one ownership containing less than 10 acres; individual lots may or may not meet 15,000 square foot minimum-standard. • 21. • r 3 - Site is a group of parcels under multiple ownership; individual lots meet a 15,000 square foot minimum standard and may be consolidated. 2 - Site is a group of parcels under multiple ownership; in- dividual lots meet a 15,000 square foot minimum standard but have potential consolidation problems. 1 - Site contains substandard lots under multiple ownership r` with potential consolidation problems. Frontage and Shape 5 - All parcels of site contain frontage of more than 100 feet; depth of all lots E.t least 100 feet. 4 - Most parcels of site contain frontage of more than 80 feet; depth of all lots sufficient to meet 15,000 square foot minimum standard. 3 - Most parcels of site contain frontage of more than 80 feet; depth of some lots insufficient to meet 15,000 square foot minimum standard. 2 - Most parcels of site contain frontage of less than 80 feet; depth of some lots insufficient to meet 15,000 square foot ! ; minimum standard. I 1 - Most parcels of site contain frontage of less than 80 feet; some parcels isolated; depth of some lots insufficient to meet 15,000 square foot standard. C• ' 6. Economic Factors I Assessed Land Value 4 - $10,000 - $15,000 per acre. 3 •- $ 6, 500 - $10#000 per acre; or $15,000 - $18,500 per acre. 2 - $ 3,000 - $ 6,500 per acre; or $18, 500 - $22,000 per acre. 1 - Lass than $ 3,000 per acre; or more than $22,000 per acre. Assessed land values are measured against Countywide values with the }west industrial sites ranging from $10,000 - $15,000 per �- acre. Tax Rate 4 - Less than $9.25 per $1.00 assessed valuation. 3 - $9.25 - $10.25 per $100 assessed valuation. �= 2 - $10.25 - $11.25 per $100 assessed valuation. 1 - More than $11.25 per $100 assessed valuation. Huntington Beach rates are measured in context of Countywide rates. C2. C 1 1 TAYLOR & BEACH SPECIFIC PLAN OCTOBER 1973 +f" t . huntin ton be • g beach �cali�orn�a r planning department . i I TAYLOR AN,i BEACH 5i I:CII:IC PLAN 73-I August 1973 As Adopted by the Planning Commission . t. October 2. 1973 Prepared by Huntington Beach Planning' Department E �i iI y :l+t'�••.. .,:'l;:6rr....+ �........_._._......._...•.... -..„...-..... ..,. . .. .. ... ,...... ........... ...,.«........................„..mrno•i}rntJ+ ,Trf..�A)a7trSc� t I Contents Page Section One: Introduction 1 1. 1 Purpose 1 1 .2 Specific Plan Area 1 1. 3 Background Summary 1 1.4 Summary of Recommendations 5 Section Two: Existing Physical Conditions 7 2. 1 Existing band Use 7 2.2 Zoning 7 2. 3 blaster Plan 7 2. 4 Circulation 11 Section Three: Problem Assessment 12 3. 1 The Exist ing School chool Site 12 3. 2 Non-Compatibility Between the Master Plan 12 and Zoning 3.3 The Existing Park Site 12 3.4 Taylor Drive 13 .Section lour: Specific Plan Recommendations 14 4 .1 Land Use Changes 14 4. 2 Zoning Changes 14 4 . 3 Street Alignment 17 4. 4 Buffer Zone 17 Summary Table 22 Section live : Implementation 23 5 .1 Specific Plan Adoption 23 5. 2 Park Site Acquisition 23 5. 3 Taylor Drive Closure 23 5 .4 Now Street Alignment Acquisition 24 5 . 5 Buffer Zone 24 5.6 Phasing Program 25 Appendix 28 7y`'`�'_.7:ri:;33: r.u.,...-_. ...,..,.....,.... _.. _ -... .... ..� ,. ... . ... . ........ .--......._ .—_....--n. w9..e•r.++sait*rr+cwa LIST OF FIGURES i Figure Title Pag o k 1 Specific flan Area Vicinity Map 2 2 Specific Plan Area Boundaries 3 3 Existing Land Use 8 4 Existing Zoning; 9 5 F i,,ting Master Plan 10 f G Lana Use Changes l5 7 Zoning Changes 16 8 Taylor Drive Closure: Phase I 18 9 Taylor Drive Closure: Phase 2 19 � 10 General Design Concept of Buffer Zone 21 11 Phasing Program Chart 27 is L. i r•' 4 RES00T;ON NO. 1127 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMAUS ION 01- THE: CITY OF HUNT 1 NGTON BEACH, CAL 1 FORN I A hEMMMENU I NG APPROVAL 01 SPECIFIC; PLAN NO. 73- 1 WHEREAS, the Plannimg Commission of tine City of Huntington Beach desires to adopt Specific Plan No. 73-1 amending the existing Master Plan of Land Usa for the purpose of approving all specific recommendations as outlined and/or illustrated within the context of tite Taylor and Beach Specific Plan Document pertaining to the area bounded by Talbert-Avenue on the north, I3each Boulevard on the east , Taylor Ilrive on the south and the Southern Pacific Railroad on the west ; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on adoption of said specific plan was held by the I'lanninl; Commission on October w, 1973 in accordance with provisions of the State Government Code ; and mir.RHAS, the Planning Commission of the City of IlLintinyton Beach is adoptir.; said specific plan in order tO: 1 . Promote the health , safety, welfare anti con- venience of the general public ; Serve as a goneral guide for thv development of public and private lards ; 3 . Provide in authentic: tewurce of information for resident: and investors of the city; 4 . To obviate the memice to public safety and property values resulting front inadequate coordin: Lion arid planning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I`i' RESOLVED, that the I'l zrini ng Commission of the City of Iluntington B%ach hereby adopts said Specific flan No. 73- 1 of the City of ,'lunt.ington Beach ; Ili, I'1' I llii'rimm ItGsoi,VI:D, that the Specific Plan No. 73- 1 is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach .is an official Specific flan of said city. PASSED AND Al►OPTn by the i'lanning Commissien of the City of Hunt ingt.on Beach, California on the tad day of October, 1971 by the following roll call vote: t I AYES: Geiger, Bazil , Higt;irr5 , Kerins , Wallin Boyle NOBS: Porter , AIISENT: None All S•rAfN: None 1 ATTrS7' 1/ V . K. A. Rcyno lc(�� Edward if. hcriri-k Secretary Chai rrn:ln t i r r i • Section I : INTRODUCTION 1 . 1 I'urpost The primary purpose of this document is to develop a specific plan of the area -defined in Sub-section 1 .2 , heretofore referred to as the "Specific Plan Area". 1 . 2 Specific Plan Area The area referred to as the Specific Plan Area is located within the CL aral vicinity of Huntington Beach . (See vicinity map Figure 1) The Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 30 acros and is bordered by Talbert Avenue on the north , Beach Boulevard on the east, 'Taylor Drive on the south and the Southern Pacific Railroad on the west . (See Specific flan area map Figure 2) 1. 3 Summary Background On March G, 1973 the Planning Commission approved Precise flan of Street Alignment No. 73-1 Alternate 1-C. (See appendix) Present at the meeting were representatives of the Five Points Homeowners , Association. Due to an earlier directive by the Planning Commission to investigate rho possibility of relocating the Taylor Drive park and school. sites , members of the Homeowners , Association were under the impression that the Commission 's Precise Plan action was for site relocation purpose . The Five Points Homeowners ' Association presented a petition to the Planning Commission and Recreation and Parks Commission. On the premise that the development # of the par;: site appears to be a reality the following; ' requests were mac, ice. stated in he petition : "l . No further delay interfere with timely completion of this long; overdue matter. 2 . The park be constructed on the present site without further consideration to adjoining; properties . 3. Work begin immediately to allow commencement of a coiitr�ct by Jul), 1 , 1973." The park was tentatively scheduled for design by July 1973. However, since the Taylor Drive park site was part of a package of parks scheduled for bids , the bidding could not occur until approval of a permit by the Coastal Commission. 1. d CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH u+a>iGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA n Now w JI \ r � r • • v`' I � `. I w� � , w ! •rr- "• 1 r INE� SPEC'FI C PLAN AREA Q, �'4 S . P, R. R. FIGURE .� SPECIFIC PLAN W INITY MAP huntington beach planning department specific plan area•taylor&beach MhERT AVE, s s 1 L 1�1�1�14f itii`i■■ s i £iF f={i = {r: __..... , '" � sit! I i�{i f `F�1�'►ii ' .i {lf IS{i'FTr} ii I-, ! CF_C -ilr-'- -- -----� r---------� GARFUD AVE FIGURE 2 SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDAPIES huntington beach planning department specif is plan area•tayfor&beach 3. i In April 1973, the Coastal Commission issued a permit to the Cite of Huntington Beach approving the parKs and 1 thus the City could pursue lids for park development . Due to the uncertainty of whether the Taylor Drive school • site would be constructed -the park site issue was tempo- rarily halted. Un6cr jurisdiction of the Ocean View School District , the district 's staff proceeded in attempting to resolve i the school site issue. The school district contacted the State about deleting tite northerly five acre portion of the school site, but the State indicated that they would not be in favor of � such an action and suggested that the school district retain all 1.5 acres . . F Tho district then investigated acquiring; parcels to the cast of the present site, but found them .too expensive . After informal discussions liett;een the staff of the school district and city about the possibility of the city acquiring portions of the school site in exchange for portions of the park site , the school district 's staff agreed not to pursue the swap issue until some i indication from the city was received. On March 9, 1973 the Planning staff developed a series of alternate plans for the area. Alternative 1 - This would retain the status quo. The park soulU be developed as is or it ' s configuration { modified through the coolie ration between tite school district and city. Alternative 2 - The park could be developed taking; all or part of Taylor Drive frontage between tho railroad tracks and the school site . Alternative 3 - This would involve :i land strap between t t—T a sc cool district and a private property owner. The district would trade the north five acres of then- site for five acres of property to the west . The park site could tl:ert be developed as is or in some other configura- tion through cooperation between the scltool district and the city. OnMarch 15), 1973 the Planning Cc%wiission approved Alternative I as the preferred configuration. The Commission directed the staff to pursue the matter with the School District Board and to investigate acquinition of a parcel or parcels to the cast of the park site . I A . ' • On .June 18 , 1973 , the school district sent- a notice to the City 's Recreation and Parks Department offering the entire school site for purchase. The Recreation and PaTks Department 'recommendation was • to acquire 2 . 5 acres of the schoul site to expand the Taylor Drive Park site to rive acres . On June 19, 1973 the Planning; Commission directed the staff to perrsue a zone change of the park site to 1111 in conjunction with the school site ronc change . Oil Julsr 10, 1973 the Planning staff submitted three alternative plans of land u:.c for the 'Taylor and Beach area. Each plan was based on disposal of the school site. After evaluating; the three alternatives , the Commission fftvored Alternate 2 . (Rofer to Figure 1.*j In the Appendix) -1'lic Commission then directed the staff to prepare a specific plan that icould coordinate all changes into one package . Jn addition , other recommendations were to be included . Thus , the Planning staff has progressively pursued the Commission's d.irec.ti•:e and does hereby submit the specific plan document for adoption. 1t should be pointed out at this time , that the, Huntington Beach Recreation and Parks Com►7iscion has recently recom- mended -tir:it a new park site he obtained . B.-rsically, the ;Recreation and Parks Commission recommends that "a five acre park site fronting; oil the south side of i:llis between Huntington and Delaware Strects be pursued as first priority for the fire points neighborhood with the five acre site previously recommended, fronting; on the north side of Taylor Street , be the second priority". The reasons given for the recommended change of the location of the park site is Outlined in a memorandum sent to tl:e Planning; Commission of August 13 , 1973. (Memorandum is included in the Appendix) 1 .4 Summary of Recommendations 1 . Redesignate the deletes: 'Taylor Drive school site for industrial use. 2 . Designate the easterly section between Talbert and Taylor, adjacent to the commercially zoned area along; Beach Boulevard , for industrial. use . 5. i 3. Establish a buffer zone between industrial :frontage along Taylor Drive and residential areas south of Taylor Drive. A . Approve a rectangular park site encompassing 5 . 0 acres . 5. Approve a new 60 foot street designation in the north- easterly section of the specific plan area. 6. Close Taylor Drive with cul-de-sac approximately 600 feet urest of Beach Boulevard. 1 s . S ` Yt� I . I[ 1 ' . Section 2 . 0: SUMMARY OF EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDI'"IONS 2 . 1 Existing Land Use With the exception of land uses along; Beach Boulevard and two residenti-t sites, all of the parcels within the Specific PI.an area are vacant. (Refer to Figure 3 for existing land use) A total of thirteen single family dwelling units are pros-cntly located within the above defined area. Eight (8) arc located in the northeast section of tti-- area facing Talbert Avenue . Five (5) are located in the 'southeast section of the area facing; "C":ylor Drive. Based on a windshield survey, four uut of the thirteen dwelling units arc in relatively good to excellent condition. The remainder �1Lew.in l��or tq fair condition needini _mino.r- or.majur impiov.ct eats . The easterly section of the area is presently occupied by some commercial facilities and one single family dwelling; unit . South of Taylor Drive is an ^stablishcd re-,idential neighborhood. A new re.sHentiz! development is in 4110 process of completion in the southwest section of the Specific Plan Area. C 2. 2 Existin}! Zoning; The Specific Plan area is ;presently zoned into six different categories . An inventory of zoning; catr.gorics within the above defined area is provided in 'Cable 1. Table; 1 Existing; lxisting �f Zoning _Acres All 23. 07 M 15 . 74 CM., 15 .06 C4 121 . 41 Cz 3.99 CFR 2 . 50 (Sec Figure 4 for existing; zoning;) i 2 . 3 Master flan Within the Specific Plan area , the existing ?caster Plan has designated the following; acreage allocation:; by Master Plan category: 7. i J I • :-)y.�+;If 1.1 r�. • .. ... .. ....{1...... .- ...c..�: Ttttjl�.. :;..,,,.:..::..:'..: :., m OF ICE i, T I T •w Nwrr-.��as�.a�w�.nu:. Samrye w�� ZU VACANT VACANT :1L: _ -*- R -01 V Ut , 1 CF— EI 'L ce r VACANT VACANT CF-R � VACANT GROTH v CHEVROLET w In TArLOA tt 1Rlr f�'lllh"�If'll�ll 1� 7/� �l r[ IaA mm ow Mn ud SINGLE FAMILY oNTARIo DR �; W I LSON DEVEL, x FORD OUEBEc DR r SINGLE FAMILY HOMES i FIGURE 1 � / EXISTING LAND USE hunting on beach planningg department specific plan area•taylorK beach R Li r �. ..� !•,�j• ;•jj ...241f,;� �,.,. ` i OFFICE TAL©ERT w m ma M air*w aiY ILy M m m am. &M.Ms.nm w w am w Mi ;1 ' E_i ; •-. Ld CD CF - F RA C4.. . �r --� 141 CF-R tatW� Mr-a�-�r'Mc-wrs�w+ y.rs�w�r iaa Mr roe Mt m�aw"_ N( �Ri_p _ 0NTA;10 DR ��- -7- � �. -• -QUEBEC OR FIGURE EXISTING ZONING WON huntington beach plannin department specific plan area•tayFor & beach 1 , t .;1;, . f I u OFFICE t TALBERT w•rn rrt r.�s w w w w w u■I Its wR we[ netsw-nrt elm rl.lrr sr�7�t'orMiq;� l INDUSTRIAL { I ND. :t DE"SIGNATED , ';_ Cb MRC`IAL_--i�7' f4 -2_t—�.. i �• is i Liu SCHOOL SITE •-, � ; l�f`-. '' t t� { i UNDESIGNATE If y P ARK f COMMERCIAL ie ! I INDUSTRIAL SITE, TAYWR ONTQRX) DR r i� W � �i } _..r QUEDEC OR FIGURE 5 EXISTING MASTER PLAN huntington beach planning department specific plan area . toylor & beach ' 10. Table 2 Existing Master flan Land Use Categories Cate or ' Acres Industry 23.0 Commercial 16 .0 Public Uses School Site 15.0 Park Site 2. 5 Undesig;noted 16. 0 (Refer to Figure S far existing; Master I'lan of the area) 2 . 4 Circulation Bordering the Specific flan area on the eas is Beach Boulevard , a major north-south highway. Access to Beach Boulevard is through Talbert avenue , 'Taylor Drive and Ellis Avenue. Main Street, a major arterial , also connects :., Beach Boulevard at the intersection between 1 Ellis Avenue , Bench Boulevard and Main Street.. Talbert Avenue presently provides east-wcst access to Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard . Ellis Avenue, westbound from Beach Boulevard , ends approximately where Huntington Street intc:sccts with Ellis . however, Ellis Avenue is schedule%: for extension to link with Gothard atreet easthsun from Goldenwest Street. ' Currently, Taylor Drive also provides access to Beach Boulevard. Upon completion of the residential develop- ment located at the southwest section of the Specific Plan Area, 'Taylor Drive will connect with Cornaby Lane . 11. • Section 3.0 : PROBLEM ASSIiSSMENT There are four major 13 ohlems in the Specific flan Area. 3. 1 The Existing School Site As mentioned in the background surunary suction of this document, the Ocean Vir:w School Ilistrict has declared the 'Taylor Drive school site as surplus . The Planning staff feels that the school site surplus could add an additional 15 acres of prime industrial land . 'Furthermore, location of the surplus land is such that by designating it for industrial use , the concentration of surplus land with adjacent industrially zoned parcels will enhance the opportunities for future development. 3. 2 Non-Compatibility Between the master flan and Zoning; The northeast Section of Cite Specific Plan Area that is undesignated in the Master Plan should be designated for industrial development. This specific section is presently zoned RA (Residential Agricultural) but is undesignated in the Master Plan. 3. 3 Park Site There still exists some uncertainty reg,11-dinl; the size and location of the proposed 'rayfor Drive park site. As mentioned in the background section of this document, the Recreation and Parks Commission recommends that a new five acre park site be obtained. Tile site recommended is located on the south side of Ellis Avenue between Huntington and Delaware Streets . Tile Recreation and Parks Commission, feels its recommendation is justified for the following reasons : '11) The topography of the new site would make a better park development and several existing, mature , ` eucalyptus trees could be retained to add immediate beauty to the developed site . 2) 'The central location would better serve hoth the single family residents and the residents of the existing and future apartments or planned units to the south of 11,1 is . 3) By moving; the park from industrial zoned property to resiLlentially zoned property the future population will be decreased and the industrial acreage enlarged. " 12. i The ex.istin- location of the proposed Taylor Drive park i site is the second priority area that the Park Commission recommends . However, it 's recommendation of this site includes the Commissions ' earlier request that the park encompass a total of S acres . The Planning Commission favors the existing location of f the proposed part: site, encompassing; a total of 2. 5 acres . I 3. 4 Taylor Drive The Planning staff has recoiAmended to the Planning Commission that. Taylor Drive be permanently closed to through traffic . This recommendation is based on two major factors : 1) The heavy traffic generated as a result of Taylor Drive access to and from Beach Boulevard will be ' eliminated by closing 'Taylor Drive . 2) The degree of traffic hazards will be alleviated by the closing of 'Taylor Drive. In lieu of the fact that there pres^ntly exists a dtrelling that requires access to 'Taylor Drive at a point where closure is proposed, some interim program must be developed. The staff has recommended a plan for both temporary and permanent closure of. Taylor Drive in the implementation :,ection of this document. • ;I 13. Section 4 .0: SPECIFIC PLAN RCCO',MM :NDATIONS 4 . 1 Land Use Changes The Planning staff recommends the following land use changes as part of the Specific Plan. 4 . 1 . 1 That the section within the Specific Ilan Area that is undesignated in the existing Master Plan and presently zoned RA be designated for light industrial use . 4 . 1 . 2 That the proposed school site referred to as the Taylor Drive school site be deleted from the Master flan. 4. 1. 3 That the remaining portions of the school site, oti)nr than the portion required as part of the reconfiguration of the park site, be redesignated for light industrial use . 4 . 1. 4 That the proposed park site be arranged in a rectareg;ular configuration encompassing a total of 5 acres . 4. 1 . 5 That the remaining; northern portion of the previously proposed park site that would be lost flue to reconfigura- tion be redesignated for light industrial use . 4 .1 .6 That till of the stated recommended land use changes in this section of the Specific Plan be in compliance with the graphic designations as illustrated ill Figure 0. 1 4 . 2 Zone Changes The !Tanning staff recommends the following zone changes •� as part of the Specific elan., 4. 2 . 1 That- all t)resent.ly zoned MI "Ling;t Industrial Districts" located w Lthin the Specific Pl in area be rezoned to .ill -A "Restricted Manufacturing District. " 4. 2. 2 That the sections of land presently zoned RA "Resi.deutial Agricultural District" within the Specific Plan area be rezoned to MI -A. 4. 2 . 3 That upon completed negotiations with the school district the portion of land acquired frnri the school district as part of the newly configurated hark site be rezoned from CF-li "Community Facilities liducational District" to Cl'-R "Community Facilities Ilecreational District . " i 4 . Z .4 That the remaining northern portion of the existing; undeveloped mark site presently zoned GI'-R be rezoned to MI-A. i 14 . I .......,.:,. ...... . ....+...... .. t... v' j�r ......... ....j.l I� �.i. TALBERT 1.3 1 i- 1 . ; fr r, P11-A t11-A cz CF-k BUFFER BUFFER •- �r�r�w Mnr■v a.r N ONYAIM DR w _j -, - _ ,-OUEBEC r , FIGURE 7 PR©ROSED ZONING huntington beach planning department specific plan area. taylor & beach 1�. 4 . 2. 5 That the deleted school site presently Zoned CF-E be rezoned to INI1-A. 4. 2. 6 A minimum setback of 45 feet fror.t the property li:ic of all industrial sites fronting Taylor Urive s]i1111 be set. 4. 2. 7 That all of the stated recommended zone changes in this section of the Specific Plan document be in compliance with the graphic designation as illustrated in Figure 7 . 4. 3 Street Alignments The Planning staff recommends the following street align- ments as part of the Specific Plan. 4. 3. 1 That a new street be adopted to run approximately 655 feet south from the centerline of Talbert Avenue approx- imately 700 feet west of the centerline of ])each Boulevard. That the newly adopted street have a miniritim width of 60 feet. 4. 3. 2 That Taylor !)rive be closed to through traffic approx- imately 660 feet west of the centerline of Reach Boulevard. 4. 3. 3 That the stated street conditions called for as part of the Specific flan be in compliance with the graphic designation as illustrated in Figures 3 and J . 4. 4 Buffer one The Planning staff recommends the following buffer zone conditions as part of the Specific Plan. 4. 4. 1 That a buffer zone be established between the Ml-A industrial sites fronting Taylor Avenue and residential tracts south of 'Taylor Drive. 4 .4 . 2 That the buffer zone run parallel to 'Taylor Urive and maintain a minimum width of no less than 15 feet from the curb lire fronting Taylor Drive. 4. 4. 3 That the physical design of the buffer zone be compatible to the proposed park site and the general criteria include laud forms such as germs and slopes , landscaping; and vegetation and any additional aesthetically pleasing elements that meet approval through Administrative Rev.iciv before the hoard of Toning Adjustments . 4.4 .4 That in any design of the buffer zone, the safety , health and 1:el£are of resident and park users must not be endangered. 17. 1 . 1 � f LANDS CAP I NG BLOCK WALL '"'�Z" � WALK TAYLOR DR. -- TALDEAT MT. 1 i Ar rtw r��r�r w w€s sMvw kF=of: i I wrwr FIGURE 8 TAYLOR DRIVE CLOSURE : PHASE 1 huntingtsm beach planning department specific plan area taylor& beach i �. RJFFE R ZME SLACK WALL �,•— �---- LANDSCAPING PEDESTRIAN WALK - TAILOR DR. BLOCK WALL t� S I DEI•IALK TALBERT Ala IL CF E it@ o _ .. . us,o r _ ti 1 il — — FIGURE 9 TAYLOR DRIVE CLOSURE : PHASE 2 huntington beach planning department specific plan area.. taylor& beach 1.9. 4 .4 .5 That the design and development of the buffer :one he tile. full responsibility of the developer and/or owner(s) and that it be so stated as a condition for development of b11-A industrially zoned district.,' within the Specific Plan area. i 4. 4 .6 That all of the stated buffer zone conditions in this section of the Specific I'lan document axe applicable to the "General" area designated as the buffer zone in all of the graphic illustrations presented in this document . A general design concept is illustrated in Figuro 10. 4 .4 . 7 That the maintenance of the buffer zone be the full responsibility of the City of Huntington Beach. f . I � I , 20 . f BLDG, PARKWAY� I S POSSIBLE ` PARK I NG . I ST t I',kYL4Z DR. , A'N A C� 'FLLIIlG R ZM$l�FF E ._0�N II �Q 5' i • 45' SETBACK PROPERTY LINE CURES LINE 1. I i• TALBERT AvE 1 T0: t • :'T i :� t �i t• Ly1. f p t= 41 r _ CF-E . i --1 CAI ITITIl - FIGURE 10 CROSS SEC■ ICON OF BUFFER ZONE 1"I'l' huntingtor, beach planning department g' k' specific plan area•taylor&beach 21 . ►=l;Cl'1•' t' I=iLAi; hli1-;A Summary 'Pa )1e s `I'a1)lc! 3 Ex Is t:int� 13ro ed Lonin 7iL ty Ac.rea on1ntt� Acre Mi 23.07 ti;l-:1 51 . 37 13A 15.711 CF-!•: 15.06 Ci -I3 2.15 I3 5. 0 C11 1.2.111 C)t 1.2.41. Tot.a1. 72.77 Tnt;a1 72. 7S 'table 11 i,ll i to I' Plan [,xr�Llrt{, Pro c's0c1 11'i:ter Plf)n Not:Ac`rr_r_ M,V,t:e•r i�lan 1,,et Ac•rea Indus c ry 23.0 Ind t r y 51 . 37 Cotntne rc^is l 16.0 Cor)urLe re l n,;1 16. 18 Ptibl.I c U ne:, 27.5 Public Uoc:; 5 . 0 Undo:.; 1-nated 16.0 tn Total 72. 75 22. I i Section live: IDIPI.I titliN'ft1'fIO�' The purpose of this section is to outline stcps required to ++ implement the Specific Plan. 1 5. 1 Specific Plan Adoption The authorisation for the adoptio►L Of ;► Slecific Plan is given by the State of California under State Planning; and Zoning Laws , Title 7, Chapter 3 , Article R. 'file procedure for adoption of a Specific Plan is outlined in Article 8 and is incli,ded in the appendix of this documen t. 5.2 Park Site Acquisition Based on the reconfiguration of the park site, the city ' will have to acquire a portion of land west of the existing; undeveloped park: site. There are two alternatives that the city may negotiate ►ritlh the Ocean View School District in acquiring the portion of land. The city may proceed in p►. chasing; the ].and or it may investigate the possibility of strapping land. If the school district agrees to s►:ap the land, the city could offer the northern portion of the existing undeveloped park site in exchange for the portion of school land fronting Taylor Drive. However, if the school district insists that the city purchase the portion of land, • the city would still have the northern portion of the park site to sell in the future. i lluring negotiations with the Ocean View Suhool District in acquiring, the additional park .land , the phasing in of the park site can begin. The design of the aylor Drive »ark site can begin as soon as tale specific plan is approved. The developlivia of the park should be able to commence in the springy; of 1974 , as this site is in the 1973-74 budget. 5. 3 Taylor Drive Closure The staff recommends that the closing; of Taylor Drive• as a through street to Beach Boulevard should take a two phase procedure. 23 The first phase would involve closing; Taylor Drive but maintaining; street access for resident: presently located on the northeast and southeast frontage along 'raylor Drive. • 'rile closure could lie clone by either installing, temporary street barricades or preferably, ending; Taylor Drive westbound from Beach Boulevard as a cul-de-sac street . (See Figure S) The second phase would involve permanently closing; Taylor Drive from the connecting; point between 'Taylor Drive .and fanny Lane. This step would only occiir when dwelling, units northeast of 'Taylor Drive would cease to exist as industrial development would occur. (Refer 'co Figure p) In order to avoid an ►tnequal distribution of vehir.ulzr traffic, phase I should not occur until Huntington Drive i and Ellis Avew.ie are fully constructed. To avoid any undue construction traffic oil the local streets within F the single family area, Phase I should not occur until the park site is fully developed. The present construction of Huntington Drive to Iilli.s ' and the near future street imps over! nt of Ellis eastbound to Delaware will provide another means of access to %ttd from the immediate residential area to Beach Boulevard. Thus , relieving the otherwise total reliance of vehicular access along; Delaware Street . (f 1 5.4 New Street Alignment Acquisition !� 'rite staff recommends that the city enter into agreements g� j with all affected parties pertaining; to street alignments � iand tied icat ions . J With respect to the precise plan of street alignment No. 73-1 , the Planning; staff recoru,tends that the city promptly negotiate with the Qccan View School District in obtaining; the portion of land needed for right-of-way. Upon completion of negotiations with the affected parties , j tite Planning; staff recommends that the city should I immediately develop a program to provide for street improvements . 5. 5 Buffer 7011c The development of the buffer zone will coincide with the development ot* ind-istrial propertic:; . The industrial properties to the west will probably develop first as Mill the westMI pOrtiott of the buffer. Industrial propertics to the cast and buffer will be the last to 2.1 develop. It is difficult to estimate how rapidly it will take for this development to occur. The industrial land absorption rate has been about 40 acres/year for the last several years . This year 60 + acres have been developed with a potential of 80 acres by the end of the year. 'I'lie Specific Plan h;as provided the basic ingredients for making this area :attractive for industrial development. f� The more vigorously the City provides for industry in this 'J area the more rapidly it will develop. 5. 6 Phasing Program Figure 10-A indicates in sequential and general time frame, development of the Specific flan area per the recommendations of this document. I 1 • Specific plan Approved - Adoption of the plan is expected y the enc of October 1973. 2 . Negotiations with School District - Upon .adoption I of the S._aeci fic Plan , the City can begin negotiations with the Ocean View School District to acquire the park site. 3. Park Site Development - Upon adoption of the Specific • Plan, design of the park site can begin and construc- tion underway by Sprint; of 1974 . 4 . New Street Program - Upon adoption of the Specific {� Plan, t ae City Should take the necessary steps to {j insure street access for any industrial properties �I that would develop. 5. Huntington Street - Huntington Street is under F construct-`ion to provide access through to Ellis and should be complete within six months . � ;.I 6. Ellis Avenue - Improvements have begun on Ellis Avenue. Complete improvements between Delaware and Gothard Streets should be in by the end of 1974 . ti 7. Phase I - Closing 'Taylor Drive - Upon completion or- tie par • site, Huntington Strect and I3llis Avenue , 'Taylor Drive can be closed as indicated in Phase I (See Fig. 8 , I1g. 18) . 8. New Street Construction - As industrial properties eve 1 op and access is rcqui red . the streets from Talbert Avenue will have to be developed. 25 9 . Industrial Develo meth Western Section - With improved 'Iccess , 1,11115tantial Industrial development should occur ill the western portion. 10. Buffer Zone Western Section - Development of t?le buffer lould occur simultaneously with industrial development . 11. Industrial Development Eastern Section - 11% 1978 develop- ment of the Eastern Section shoula begin. Within a short period after, 800 of the industrial land in the Specific Plan could be absorbed. As mentioned previously , City policy could significantly affect industrial development in this area. 12. Duffer Zone Eastern Section - As industrial properties evelop, the buffer zone east of the park: site Mould develop simultaneously. 13. Phase II - Closing Taylor Drive - Upon total development oT the industrial land and completion of the buffer zone , Taylor Drive could be closed as indicated in Phase 1I (refer to Fig. 9, Pg. 19) . This would complete develop- ment of the Specific Plan area as recommended in this document. 1 26 i Enter Into s Agreements One or F Financial Resource both Streets TAYLOR AVENUE SPECIFIC: PLAN PHASING PROGRAM New 28 mos. 8 New � 4 Street I Street Program Construction riciire II Negotiations 2 with school District , { 1 3 ti 7 9 11 13 specific Park Closing Industrial Partial Closing Plan I Yr. y, Site 6 mq' Taylor 1 yr. Devel. 2 yrs. or total Taylor Approved # Devel. Drive West Section Ind. Develop. Drive Phase I • Phase II 1976 1978 5 6 10 12 Buffer �Br.ffer Huntington Ellis � Zune Zpil �e Street Ave. Western � Eastern Section Section 1976 1978 4 i i i 1 �,y J • ;1 A PPi?I'I)LX j P, �a Ii ;I � I p i { 2C. � I w /• ti�l�.:.�5 .:{ +..::;jjl. I.. .�J. { :I�:,,.r•,.;.. ,r :,;,�; ..:� '` •.::'i:'� is �' � � � ... : TAEOERT AVF. _ I f . :�: ".•: � � .? . : •yam I I t. . .• � J �c r CF E l f . T N + ONIAFOD PRECISE PLA!,l 73-1. ADO?TED PLANNING COMV,. 3I ON Al HUNTINGTON BEAD' PI.ANMING OEP1 ; FIGURE 12 ��.l..ti..1t .-{af••�..-�� �ii~ • �Ljtt•........•��� �� .+•1 . fr•11(( •...•t.••1�•♦�:i......•...•... - — - - - - ++ • 11 t IS 7 1 i •��t titer ,►,:+.,.t..11.t, , ._' . '.ii �. Vt u i 1- i ,• .a • 1f 1 r t • -t � 1 1 I•: _ I j Clil11M IND, IN'D. fft f �C fi.y.r. � i:.-t.... t ii .:r...�.�.w.....u.w..w.o..�..........-�.��...�.f+� ♦ i F•I CURE 1.3 t ALTcRINATIE ?, JULY 1-973 30. + �1��' � l,wrT'�I ��i �•���r•��11t1.nA�•�x���.t Z .��rt�./'1.�• lNTEH•pF`.I'F,HlhtCNI CC!• MUNICATIQ19 To. Planning Cornrrl: -,`orl I rlllll �t.'cS �' (�!att Pct_•I;:; Subject Taylor Street: Par:. Situ n.te Juno 23 , 1"73 At their last reCular meet-In;, the II,rcrcw.• ' on and I'avl::: j Conulis lion recorlmend^d that fundu allccat--d t'tw prIt-c1;110c of a nelghborhood jar-lc adjacent to Roloinwoo,t School, In 1973-711 (�� budp,er, be «:sera to purchese aTI additional ?.. acre::, r7_' laird from the Qet:an Vi(-r; School District '.-, Taylor %,,ni to improve, throttF,h wade and sa' e , the part: or'irnL t.iun ca i the exIsLin ; ;Itt,. The -CoirmJn Icon al:-C) T•"(•u:,""�"1CtcC1 1'il �t we enter into) a Joint--po erL With i.hy 'J .0.^.11 VJIL-: ` r School District �o develop and maintain a 2•;ierr: neir,hbor- hood pant on Robinwood School.. See attached male layouts of the propo::eci situs. '•Y Z. xj7 Rcopectfully Norm. j•1ui•Lt tary Recreation Park-5 M-1:a c Attachments cc : Five Point: Homeowners Assn. City Admini::trator Recreation and Parks Cot.z:,ti3sior, ^7 tl,l. Y'I i ai. • I � CITY OF HUNTINGTOH BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►nnmcnty uacu To H.B. Planning Commission Prom H.B. Recreation & Parks • Commission Subject Taylor Street Park Site Date July 20, .1973 Mr. Ed Selieh, Chief of Advanced Planning, made a presentation to the Recreation and parks Cor-mission at their last regular meeting of July 11, relating to the action taken by your honorable body in regard to the Taylor Street neighborhood park realignment. The Recrea- tion and Parks Commission moved their original recommend- ation to the Planning Commission requesting; a 5 acre nei h- borhood park be negotiated or traded with the Ocean View School District with the configuration horizontal to the adjacent tract be brought to the attention of the City Administrator and the City Council for the following rea- sons: 1) With the removal of the school site, the poten- tial recreational area is reduced by 10 acres. 2) The service area of the park includes 10 acres of undeveloped R--2 and 2 acres of undeveloped R-3 south of Ellis which in the future will generate a greater need for the park than now exists. 3) In order to include into the design of the park open turf areas suitable for running; team games such as softball, football and hockey without the benefit of school play areas will require a 5 acre site. 4) The 5 acre park will provide a better buffer zone than 2 112 acres between the residential and industrial uses. 5) The Ocean View School District is receptive to ajoint-powers agreement to develop a neighborhood park at Robinwood which would free allocated funds for Robinwood acquisition in the 1973- 74 budget to apply at the Taylor site. .Respectfully submitted, �1tiG �G�c c� Norm Worthy, Secr/ary H.B. Recreation Wnd Parks NW:ac Commission cc: City Council. Mr. Dave Rowlands, City Administrator Recreation and Parks Commission R. M. Russell, President, Five Points Homeowners Assn. 32. I' • INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION nr�ti�c.un El if%W To Planning Commission From Recreation & Parka Corrrniss3on 'Sub;-_ct Taylor Street Park Site Date August 13, 1973 .After further investigation, study, and analysis of your recommendation and the Recreation & Parks Cormiission' s j recommendation concerning the neighborhood park fronting the north side of Taylor Drive, the Recreation and Parris i Commission is now reeoriLmending a new panic zite be obtained which they feel would better serve the Five Points neigh-- t boyhood i At their last regular meeting; upon motion by Mr. Jim Curran the Recreation and Parks Commission unanimously recorvnended to the Planning Commission that a five acre paric site front- ing on the south side of Elklis between ►iuntint ton and Dela- ware Streets be pursued as lirst priority for the Five Points neighborhood with the five acre site previously re- , commended, fronting on the north side of Taylor Street, be the second priority. The reasons given for s 'the rece.,.m nded r.�ant;e in location of the park site were as follows: 1) the topography of the new site would make a .better park development and ; several existing, mature, eucalyptus tree:: could be retained to ndd Immediate beauty to the developed site. 2) The cen- tral location would better serve both the single farajly res- idents and the residents of the existing and future: apart- ments or planned units to the south of Ellis. 3) By moving the park from Industrial zoned property to residentially I zoned property the future population .rill be decreased and the industrial acreage enlarged. !: Covington Brothers Development Co. is in the procens of designing a Planned Unit Development on the 10 acres parcel which the Commission would like to have a 5 acre neighbor- hood park. They area prepared to d1sauss the possib111ty of a par): on their property on I?riday, Aui;ust 17, with the sub- division corunittee i!:'l:ac cc : I•ir. David Rowlands, City Administrator Recreation and Parks Commission Five Points Homeowners Assn. :1ECEIVEJ AU G 1973 PIA,14PII1lu DEPT" 33. • . . �• rAt�' CITY OF HUNTIN TON BEACH • INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,nnn�t,Uw�t+cn To Planning Commission From Recreation & Parks Commission Subject Taylor Street Park Site Date September 17 , 1973 At the regular meeting of the Recreation F Parks Commission held on September 12, 1973, the Commission discussed the pros and cons of their August 8 recommendation (attached) to :he Planning Commission concerning the relocation of our neighborhood park in the area bounded by Talbert, Main, Gothard, and Beach Blvd. Mr. James Shepard moved the Recreation & Parks Commission stcnd on their August 8 recommendation to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Mr. Kent McClish. Ayes 4, Noes 6. Motion failed. RECOMMEiNDATION Ffr:Jim u� moved the Recreation & Parks Commission recommend to the Planning Commission their priority be changed to first pursue a 5 acre park site fronting on Taylor Street and secondly to pursue a S acre site south and adjacent to Ellis Street between Huntington and Dela- ware. Seconded by Mr. Cooper. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Norm Worthy, ecret . Recreation $ Parks Commission f NW:ac cc: Recreation & Parks Commission Mr. Russell , Five Points Homeowners Assn. Mr. Rowlands , City Administrator Mr. Berg, Ocean View School District Attachment L-*!VE 0 ISFY i 1973 1 1 .St'£1Le of Calaifot�nia , ltclnt:ctl to • C.onservaL ion nnr1 111.attnl.n};, u, -- l . Article S. 1ut'aority I'vr anti] Scr.11 c of,pert;ie I l.irai G5159. The Planning aoeney may, tar If:o dii ev:ail by the lt•�;i�la• tive holly Stinfl, prepare }tecifie Plan:, h.i:.ed rn tlo l;meral plan and drafts of such regulatiwl3, prrrwtvi, prat] 1:;;islatioll ,n.; way is its ' judgment be required for the sy:•trinntic cxeeaainn of 2h4• general plan And the plsnnin- n,;en.y rnrty re•,omrt:nnd such phit.'s ;:rill measures to the lv!zislative body fur ruleption. 65451. Such speeitjc pl.,ns tails inewde: (a) Rettnl.stions limilin-,tlse Icc.1tion of httifrii;l_s and other improve• ments with respect to exiatin; or plaatlril rights•uf-way. (b) Regulations of the use of land and bui!tliu;;:,, il:r. height and bulk of buildings,and the open spat•rr almut buildings. c) Regulations of thr us►b of open space Inuit. d) Street and highway nnmim; and nuinh-rin. plant ih order to � establish the otfiaial tintaes of strceta and highway:+, to remore eontliete, duplication and uncertainty ntnung sw:h names, rind its iwovide tin orderly itystent for the nlunbering of buildings and proper tics. (e) Such other mutters which will tht• at this chapter,inetndinr prnt•rdure for 11:e mlininisiration of such reriulatioras. (f') Such ot1w ineamires it:, may br requiri'd In insure Cite viecutiuti of t1:P general plan. (.1werd►.t bl ti.Jtr.jli.9.Ch.15txt,) i Articlo D. Pravedure for ikdnptiou of Speriae I'larti rind Re";ulhttinns L 6.5500. Ilrfnre recommenilinr to 11m le-Wative hady that it atlopt n :peritie plan u,- regulativit or any tlli%an titcrit t l a peNitit! plan ; or rc;ulatiun, the plzuwiu;; cbm%1i:,watt tloall hull .1: te.tit Oil,! (1) publie hcrirhi . Notice of till, time Old pNO. (if said Lrar•intr i.h 11 10 (riven ILL lcaa: 20 t icat'..ar ti::ri Lcfont tl': I,rarin:; i:1 tl,a fullniviag : winner: - (it) If the inti:ter i:. heforo a c-)-.vi,y pl annir.;; cunlrai{Linn, the {` ntitica 311,111 lia Imblishrrl at Ic.^.st (:Ite. in n t:eta.,;1.tP:r of grileral t circulation pubtiihed and circulated in tha c)tinty, yr if fit '.'c is rlonc, � it t,batll ba p Ard in at least three public:p!.arr: in the coulity. I (h) If the hatter is b;furl, A city p!aiming, ren,ulis,iun, file uotiea mall ba publisher; at lersi once in n t:e.::}:.zper of gzncral eirc►tlatiun pnhlUird owl cirrulatod it: th,� city, or it tbcre it ituao, it shall be posted in at Irast thre,i Public pl„c•i in tl vitti•. ' In nddition '.o notice: by tabuov or city t.,ny piva notica of thety livarin in suCI, otl;or jcnatt•:r a; i'. t riv &!,L't li,:rt's'ary or dmimbl Any hearing may b-vortitntr.,l ,-.iri tiny.to ti,a• I (Mi51)1. Tl,c rtc n-:ait'111lation (.0 ;iris' S1,.Cli:,' ]ricer] a. ` -oil•ition, or o: ratty ama�andmeut to i :.peal: pt.ut G, m:nlation, shall Le by resolution 9f the pinnain, commission carried by tl:a nOI:r•atira totes � of not lcm than a majority of its trital vating m.er;ltleN.- G550?. A copy of any specific plan, re;ulatiun, oe amend.neat recot:men(N pennant to Cii�i nrti.,!e sbjill be Lubrnitted to th:! i:;;islu• Live body and t t.-ill be aret,lii}l nie,l by a statetnetit of the plaimin, canintisaiun's rcmoris for such recom1.1e'tltlatiait. 65503. Upon rent".nt of n eripy of any prgw.;••tl sp.-ctiic plait ar regulation or amend, u-iit of :.nett plan Pr regidation thu, Ic,:Wative billy may by ordicinnce o: resulutica a,lt►p t cite plan a: rcipliation. Ilefore adopting, the projwed sp'ei;.! p!au or v-pilatian tlse 4.0%13• five body shall hold at ler,.,t one (1) p::blitz b,•arinr. Nntiee of file titue and Plnce of taid headw: shall be given in the tit:',( and mamv!r pro- tided for the givivg, of iintice of the hearing by the plannin;; cotarais- Lion nit rpecirled in Section 65500. 35. I I • Ili addition to notice by publientiou, ti cnnttty or vity may jive notice of tite hearing; in batch otl!cr niunner r; it may dean ne.c ry or desirable. Any hearing finny be cot►thilied from time to titne. Such plan or regulatiou, w; :dupted, nLall 1,.! decignattil a a spe. cific plan or rc{;itlation. f►,7.`►01. The legiElutivc bodti- ,shall not utrihc-any change or uddi. tion lit any proposed specific I+Snn, ri-gulatiott, ur amenduicnt thereto recoinntendrd by tl,o pl:toning co:nrni+sign until tlic proposed rhnuge nr audition hits been referred to the plcilning cn-ranksion for a report and it r• py of the report has been filed %vith the legislative body. Failure of the plautiint; coininission to report i►;thin.fatty (•10) days after the reference, or such lunger period as may ho designated by do lelp%lative body,shall he deciacd to be njiprnv:,1 of the propozcd change or addition. It eliall not be neees,nry far the planning commission to hold a public Bearing oil Euch proposcil chatme nr addition. CM05, if the city dues not have a p1mining commission, the only procedural steps required for the adoption of it spccifio plan or rel;- ulation nr nuv animidnirnt to n specifte plan or regulation shall be those provided in this article for action by the logh—lative body. G5506. Abthiug in this article applies to Vle adaptiun or nmcnd. uicitt of Poly ordinance by the Irgislntive body, n•hetlier or not it may relate to the subject,; auattioned in Ai title H of thin chapter, except ordinauecs expressly adopting or intending a tpecific plan initiated ptirstumt. to this chapt►-r. (Am►ndhd by V-tnts. 147,41. Ch. 15%1.) C5507. Wheii it dccins it to be fur the public interest, the le.islittive body may initiate and adnpt an ordinance or resolution estah!ishing a specific plan or an amendment thereto. The legislative holy rhail flmt refer such proposal to establish sneh specific pi-in or nmcadinrnt thereto. to tile planning commi.- iuu for a report. Before inahint; it report, tin planning cuinati<sion ►.hall hold fist bast one public ltvariit;;. The plan. that.-; cmumissiuit Oiall report within ail tint►: after the reference. or within suclt lon-Ur period as may be dez4-nate►1 by the legislative body. Ilefore ailopting the propa�ed plan or runctidinent the legislative body Fhall hold tit least one publie hearing. Noliev of thu that, and Mare of hettring% held pur%unnt to thi-i sev..tiun >hiJl Ue given in the time and maimer provided for the giving of notice of by tic plunuitt;; ruintai&.4on rs t:peeifted iu Section G5500. f.1d.lnt by Sl&la. 11070. N►. Articlo 10. Administrr,tioti of Specific Plans Lod Regulations G5550. The le,,^,Mative Ludy mny dtterinim! and estuhli:.li Fdniin- istrative rules and procedurt4 for the t+r l euforrt-r,:ct!t of rpeeitie plans and rtgulatious. dud mm- ussi;ii or delegate such udmir.- istrative functions, pov:ers, rind duties to the I&II-lint,• or other ageuey as neat'be neeer nary or desirable. 65551. The lcgh-lative body utay cre:,tc- ntlininistratAlve ta;encic., boards of retic%v, i►ppeal, and adjustment, ned p_ovide far other oGl. vials, and for funds for the compeiisation of shell officers, employccs, t-ud nt:eneies and for the support of their W'At. C5552. No street shall be improved and no Powers or conncctioas or otlicr improvements shall be laid or authorized in any street witbiit any territory for whieb the legislative body has cdopted a specific Etrect or hi+.hway plan until the inatter lies been referred to the planniu;; rgency for a report as to conformity with such specific street or higa- ttiay plan and a copy of the report has breti filch vrith the legislative body unless one of the fol_'o«iut;conditions npplii.s: (a) Th-t atrect has becu necepted, opened, or Lots othencis: re. ecivcd the feral tutus of a pub!ie street prior to ,.tie adoption of the p1cn. (b) It corresponds wilh rtrect.�s shown oil the plan. (e) It corresponds r:it}i Et.-Vets sl,nirn oil a suhdi•:ision map or rec. ord of surrey approved by the legislrtive body. (d) It corresponds with streets EhoHn on a subdisidon mcp pre- viously approved by the planning coinwimsion. Such report shall be submitted to the l ;islative body v,ithin fcrty (40) days after the matter vci:3 referred to the planning uCency. •y G:,.'►:�3. No :trcr•t t0tall b.- iniproved, tit) sewers or =uunaetiutls or other impro•.•:mrtit;shall lb, laid or public buildia;; or warks including ► « , eahool buildings constructed within any territnry for which the lelria- lative body haq adopted it specific plan regulatim; the we of open• bpaee land u.t:tl the matter 11:1.: 1wen referred to Ow plautlln- t)"IenVy ..6r a report its to conformity nalt mich specific plan, a copy of the. report. hi4q been ftltyl with the body, nn(1 a inditi made by the )oql-ilative body that Ow proliowd hutlu•ot•einemt, connection or con.itructiou is in conformity with the spccifie plan. Such report aliall be submitted' to the leer►islative body within forty (40) ( o)•9 after the matter wax referred to the planing swency. The ro-tluirementa o: tlti-i sectiou shall alit apply in the case of it street which was accepted, opened, or had othertris,- received the legal state:, of a public street prior to the adoption of the specific plan. (AttJrol by:3taty. 1:►i0, Cit. 1300.) 37. RrSOLUTIOII IIO. 3310 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVINIG SPEC!:IC PT AN ?I0. 73-1 WHE9EAS, pursuant to the Planning and 7.oni n,; La.•r, the Planning Corlmission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice d=ily given, held a public hearing; on Au ust 21, 1973, which was continued to and concluded at, its meeting of October 2, 1973, relative to Specific Plan No. 73--1 to Pro- vide tc d to run approximately vide a net•r street:, 6 . feet in i th, n 655 feet south from the center 11ne of Talbert Avenue, approxi- mately 700 feet Crest of the center Line of Beach 3oulevaard, and to close Taylor Drive to through traffic approximately 660 feet west of the center line of Beach Boulevard; and On November 5, 1973, after notice duly given pursuant F to law, hearing ;ras held before this Council on the proposed ► specific plan, and the matter having been considered, the r Council finds that the proposed ne.•: street and proposed closure of Taylor Drive is reasonably necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city, and !or the orderly development rf the comr..uniLy, 1,1011, TUREFORE, the City Qouncil of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That .Specific Plan No. Y3-1, ns amended and can file In the office of the CI ty Clerk, is hereby approved. 2. That the clan, designated Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby adopted as p?rt of Specific Plan No. 73-1• PASSED A'iD ADOPTFD by the City Council of ube City of I JOC:ahb 1 , t Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof helot on t:7e 17th day of December, 1973. Mayor ATTEST: , APPROVED AS TO FORM: ri 'q - et � City Cler j City Attdrney s, n' i� e. i•� i i:• T y'. j r J. 2. �I i I Res. No. 3810 F y .. `� STATE OF CAMFORNIA ) • COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) • l I, ALICIA M. WMMORTH, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Reach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th eay of December , 19 73 by the following vote: R.. AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Green, Coen, Dulte NOBS: Councilmen: Matney AUSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs �4 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California J 'f •,1 •Y S 1 III • e t t , 4 r REomb f FOR 1TY COUNCIL'ACTION Data September 5, 1999 Submitted to: lionorable Mayor and City Council /� Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator C�=,� APPItO3ryD By CITY COUIrTCIL Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works Subject: KOVACS CIRCLE CONSTRUCTION FUNDING ~� Ci�TY G4 gut .Consistent with Council Policy? NJ Yes New Policy or Exception Stawn*nt of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Council action is required to modify the 1989-90 budget document to Include the construction of Kovacs Circle in the Talbert - Beach redevelopment area. REC.c�MMENDATION: Authorize an appropriation of $47,340.50 from the Talbert - [leach redevelopment area fund balance into an expenditure account to be created for this purpose. ANALYSIS: Last fiscal year the City collectee $57,340.50 from the Redondo Kovacs Partners as their share of the cost of constructing Kovacs Circle In the Talbert - Beach redevelopment area. On May 5, 1989, $10,000.00 of this deposit was expended to purchase right-of-way, Plans for the proposed street have now been completed and the project Is ready to begin. However, because of the ending of the fiscal year, funds for the project were not encumbered and now must be reappropriated in order to begin the work. FUNDING SOURCE: Certificate of Completion funds now on deposit in account G-TT-00-000-3-31-01 to Le transferred in to account E-TT-810-6-32-00. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Disapprove the proposal and refund the deposit to the developers. ATTACHMENTS: F.I.S. P1?C:LFS:35:c!w Eg 2169g/5t ia� Z �Ilif�'F+��39 t+:�JNIl'NiFH 30•lli7 00001 'i!lL3RD%11:1t9 ?f3ltf�i Plo SM •3��.... a.r'Ln•�2.: :.i%.r '.i.�Y.. ^;.: .. ... .. ... ,. .., :• . .: _ ..,..�....�—..s..w,^�ctif.:`,:i.aG.xx.cwsaY,;+...: '�• GITV OF HUNTINGTON MACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION IMyTM..Tood/TACH To Paul E. Cook From Robert J. Franz City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Subject Request for Appropriation to Date August 23, 1989 Fund Construction of Kovacs Circle - FIS 89-21 A5 requested unifier the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed construction of Kovacs Circle in the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Area. Anticipations are that an appropriation of $47,340.50 would suffice for this purpose. Funds in the required denomination are presently on deposit with the City, and have been earmarked solely for this project. Failure to utilize these . _ funds for this purpose, according to the requesting entity, nay rezul:. in the necessary unding of th deposit to the develcy,mrs. an Deputy City nistrato R.7F:AR:lw D CITY GF i!U1;iitJGi0tl BEACH /.Dl.�ilE'�iP'1TIVr BFi:lt',1; I Fiscal Impact Statement 4<OVACS CIRCLE CONSTRUCTION 1 . Budget Status ------------- The project is not budgeted in fiscal 1989-90. It tuns scheduled for :onstruction last year, but was delayed by problems in right-of-way acquisitio►a. 2. Total Costs a. Direct: A $47,340.50 expenditure from the Talbert-Beach redevelopment area fund balance. b. Indirect% The lags of interest earnings on these funds. 3. Funding Source ---------------- a. Funds: Unappropriated redevelopment receipts now an deposit In account G--TT-00w-000-3-01-01 . b. Revenue Source: Certificate of Completion funds. c. Alternative Funding Source: General Funds. d. VIIstory: The Certificate of Completion program is new to the City and has not been used In the past. REQUE97BOR CITY COUNC CTION /alt ?II.6 _ Date June 2G, ]9 CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE Submitted to: '_.Q1):YC ""ern F THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA c Submitted by: IL HUTTON, AGENCY COUNSEL --� �'"' » � " Prepared by: 4AIL HUTTON, AGENCY COUNSEL '- I- I , Subject: Resolution of Need and Necessity Talbert-Beach Project Area Consistent with Council Policy? Ix Yes I I Ntw Policy or Exception fle4i q;p-/ Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attach:7entu STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach needs to acquire certain real property commonly known as AP 159-141-49 to complete the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project. The title to the property is clouded. There is no way to clear the title without condemning it. $�c7�g[�.HDATiON Pass a Resolution of Need and Necessity authorizing the Agency Counsel to file a condemnation action in this matter to obtain this property. ANALYSIS'. The Agency needs to acquire the clear title to the property. Because of detects in the chain of title, the Agency is unable to ascertain the holder of the record title. It is, therefore, necessary to bring an action in eminent domain to acquire the property and quiet L-itle to this property. FUN CIUg SOURCE: The Redevelopment Agency ALTE$NATIVP._ACTION: Do not adopt resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Letters to Mrs. Sharon Smythe Resolution of Need and r'ecessity PIO 5/85 '�L. .. .1 _ .. ,. . -, .. •' ... .1.. .. .....,r .:!'.Li':7.::.a,r•L.n,............w...yn[7G: t OFFtck OF •_� '�, CITY ATTORNEY P.O.BOX V40 WO OWN"REeT HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 92647 GAIL HUT ON TELEPHONE 0ty AttOMW f7Ti,a2ilG66G June 19, 1989 Mrs. Sharon C. Smythe Rt. 3, Box 255 Dennison, Texas 75020 1 Re: Lot 20 AP Parcel 159-141-45, Tract 172, Block C Dear Mrs. Smythe: As you know, the referenced Lot 20 was to have been acquired by the Redevelopment Agwicy for the appraisal amount in 1983. However, at the last moment before closing escrow. defects in the title were found. You were advised of these defects and agreed to dlear the title in order to be fuily paid. You did contact Mr. William Carlson, Jr., in this regard, however, record title is not clear In your name. The record title appears to be in the name of Arena Gable and your late husband's parents, William and Bessie Kincaid. We have attempted to locate Anna Gable, but we are as yet not fully 16 possession of the facts, and it appears she may be deceased. In any event, she or her heirs or estate appear :.a be entitled to one-half the proceeds, and you as heir to your late husband are heir to ,he estate of the deceased parents for the other one-half. ! I Enclosed is an unexecuted copy of the Summary for Basis of the Appraisal Opinion dated ! February 24, 1984, for Lot 20 AP Parcel 159-141-49, Tract 172, Block C, which the Agency desires to acquire from you. This summary was prepared during our previous negotiations. Because of the expense involved In the clearing of the title, we are now offering you the sum of$3,269.00 for the quit claim of your interest, if any, in the property. Sinceroly yours, 7 GAIL HUTTON City Attorney ; GH/rjl I ` Enclosure i oFIICE OF CITY ATTORNEY F.O.BOX 2140 2M MAIN STREET 11 HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 92047 GAIL Ht1TTON 17 415364M City AttorMy p14)B2�aQ86 June 19, 1999 Mrs. Sharon C. Smythe Rt, 3, Box 255 Dennison, Texas 75020 Dear Mrs. Smythe: On July 5, 1989, at 7 p.m. ln.the Council Chambers at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency intends to adopt a "resolution of necessity" as such is described in California C e of CiviProcedure 124S.235. This resolution will evidence the intention of the City of Huntington Beach to take an Interest in the real property commonly known as A.P. 159-141--49. Your name and address appear on the last County of Orange Assessment roll as owner of the interest in real property to be acquired. Please take notice you have a right to appear and be heard on the following matters: a) Is there a public interest in and necessity for the City of Huntington Beach to acquire the stated interest in the property? b) Is the project planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury? c) Is the interest to be acquired necessary for the project? Your right to appear and be heard will be waived by your failure to file with the city a written request to appear and be heard within fifteen (15) days from the date shown on the postmark of this letter, which is the date of mailing. You may engage the services of an attorney to represent you in this matter. Sincerely, GAIL HUTTON City Attorney '...w.......�..- _... ..... ... .•v.... o ... .:... ,)•'•• n/•..N'•Myyn+.r+.n.urn....e.a 4/ J• �d' CITY OF HUNTINGTO►N ©EACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION wwnw7c"u*c" To DOUGLAS LABELLE From TONY MOYA Director of Economic Development Paralegal, City Attorney' s Officc Subject Resolution in Regard to Date June 14, 1989 Kincaid Lot #20 We are forwarding to you the resolution in the above referenced matter for your signature. We understand that this matter is urgent and that we need to include the same for consideration in the Next immediate availaLle meeting of the Agency which is on the Sth of July. We are coordinating with the City Clerk's office regarding the notice requirement for the hearing. T MOYA Par legal TM/rji Attachment cc: Connie Brockway, City Clerk's Bill Amsbary, Special Counsel \ li M REQUEST FC' REDEVELOPMENT ?nENCY" CTiON RH 87-2fi ON 'y�o•8 7 Ti'£�£/QKl;� ?� `r��f April 10, 1987 Date Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Submitted to: Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer -w Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City AdmInistratar/RedevelopmAIES - Prepared by: DEDICATION OF PARCEL FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTI r p Subject: KOVACS CIRCLE r !` Consistent with Council Policy? >Q Yes ( ) New Policy or Exception �l Statement of issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alter '' ...._._w. .I91.? OF— STATEMENT OF ISSUE: t4l Y CLt:RI: The Redevelopment Agency owns a ten (10) foot strip of land developed right-oi-way of Kovacs Circle within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. With the development of the adjacent Industrial parcel it Is now necessary to dedicate this parcel for street .and public utility purposes. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to prepare necessary documents to dedicate to the City of Huntington Beach an easement for street and public utility purposes (identified on the attached exhibit) and authorize the Clerk to execute the necessary documents for recordation. ANALYSIS: On March 16, 19879 the Redevelopment Agency selected Boureston Development, Inc. 'to purchase and develop the five (S) acre industrial parcel owned by the Agency in the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. Access to this parcel from Talbert Avenue is provided via Kovacs Circle. Kovacs Is currently developed for only Fart of Its ultimate right-oi-way. The balance of the right-of-way is a separate parcel owned by the Redevelopment Agency. However, this parcel needs to be dedicated for street and public utility purposes. As a cone ltIon of the development of the industrial parcel, Boureston will be required to fully Improve Kovacs Circle from Talbert to the Industrial site. FUNDING SOURCE : No out-of-pocket expenses Incurred by the Redevelopment Agency for the dedication of this parcel for street and public utility. Plo/1/a5 ,.�.a .. .'. ,. .'.., _ - . . alit:�7�',,, .�� •-,7,=�Z;1f+�X:^-s. y -s • R H 87-24 April 10, 1987 Page Two ALTERNATIVE ACTION Do not approve dedication of this parcel to the City of Huntington peach for public street and public utility purposes. This action, however, would be inconsistent with present policy of having physical street and utility Improvements across fee ownership parcels other than City-owned. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit 1 - Map of the parcel to b: dedicated. CWT/DLB/SVK:sar 1284r ,.. .. . - . .. i•. ,,:..._. ... ..L.�:• � ,'•.r'*- •'��--rr.-...�.� _lam.rt:J.'.w�.G;.�.,cti5• tii:AS.�I�'17`��►�^• P �G i gLge'y dtup. i r I I � J. . Q h 4 i J S�'GCKSI+�RE n S�NEET � L N. yJ �� �J �d' Q 1 `r t TfN�/o.x,) Flar ;%vicez ro 6'DE'Pe,onFD 7V CM1 GF V /DOS EXHIBIT I r a � : REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION M 84-20 j Date June 13 1984 ; Submitted to: Honorable Mayor/Chairman and City Council/Redevelopmen GO r Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Ex e Off r G Prepared by: Thomas D. Tincher, Redevelopment CoordinaW Subject: FWSMAIrICN NLV ERS AND I TING CONE SENIOR HOUSING PRINCIPAL PAYMERr A11:17 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alter " e ions, Attachments: STAZEMENf OF ISSUE Tt:e permanent tax-exempt financing for Emerald Dove is now secured. Sale of these "Certificates of Participation" was approved by the City Council and Redevelopment Agency a: its joint special meeting held Thursday, May 31, 1984. These securities were sold as an "interest only" financing to take advantage of market conditions at the tine of sale. However, it has been the intention of the City and the request of Golden State Sanwa Bank that principal payrtients Use be made. Since it will not be necessary for the Trustee to make principal payments to the certificate owners, another mechanism for the deposit of these principal payments is required, aixi such an account is established by the two attached resolutions. WCON42 ATIGN: Approve and authorize the City Clerk to execute: RESOL(TPION N0. 4q00RESO[,TPION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HURrINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING THE EMERALD COVE 8 SENIOR HOUSING PRINCIPAL PAYMIr ACx=NT i RESOLUTION W. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVEWPMFNT AGENCY OF THE � CITE OF HUNTINGION BEACH ESTABLISHING n1E EMERALD COVE SENIOR HOUSING PRINCIPAL. PAYMENT 1 ACCIOUNT ANALYSTS Council will recall that to assure that the tax-exempt securities sold to create long-term financing for Emerald Cove would be highly marketable and f achieve'the lowest passible interest rates, a Fetter of Credit from Golden State Sanwa Bank was secured. This Letter of Credit resulted in a AAA rating on this issue, and it would pay all amounts outstanding to the certificate owners shaald the City ever default. As originally envisioned, this financing was to have a ten-year term with principal and interest payments made upon a thirty-year amorti-cation. i To take advantage of the market conditions prevalent at the time of the securities sale, this issue was sold as an "interest only" financing; that is, the Trustee will receive and disburse payments to the certificate � rio Bret i Fri 84-20 June 13, 1984 Page 2 owners in an amount equal to only the interest due. however, it is the City's intention, and a condition of the approval of Golden State Sanwa Bank's Letter of Credit, that principal payments also be made. Since the documents governing this financing will include no mechanism for the collection and payment of principal amounts to the Trustee, it is I necessary to establish a mechanism through which such payments can be made outside of the tax-exempt transaction. Golden State Sanwa Bank does not require that such principal payments be made to the bank or the 'Trustee but has requested that the City establish its own account through which the stipulated principal payments will be deposited Evriodically. 'his approach has the advantage that it does not car-plicate the tax-exempt financing which will close on June 19, 1984, ana permits the City to retain complete control and investment o= these principal payments. Golden State Sanwa Bank simply requires that the City and Agency stipulate that the principal payments deposited in this account be reserved for the sole and exclusive use of principal redemp,-ion at the end of the ten-year term of the financing. The two attached resolutions establish such an ac=mt, which for convenience has been entitled the "Emerald Code Senior Housing Principal Payment Account." EMING SOURCE: Emerald Cove Certificates of Participation, rent revenues, and Redevelopment Agency funds. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not approve the attached resolutions. This will not comply with the conditions of the approval of Golden State Sarrda Hank's Letter of Credit and will delay th:- culmination of the financing for Emerald Cove. A'TTACtiI►OM: Resolution No.5q()O Resolution No.:Ki I CWr:TT:as s . 1 I i i i f I&ejA6 Jn`'F.S 11A.1-7. .1I1A • 1III'1•I:. A i,norLSSIONAL I.Ak rOHPOHATIOK ATTOtt\1iYS AT LAW • HENNETi1 i JONI:S FOUR ENHARCADL'RO CENTER AVT)IIEN• C iIALL.•ift SUITE 1050 11011ERT J. HIM. SAN FRANCISCO P4111 SIIAIION STANT0% % II1Tf: C HARLES F Ar,.%ms June 6, 1984 (413) i101•37f10 s,rcr iinv it CASAI.k:0010 NILLIAM It HAI)ISON AMONATIC TCLCCONIFR /'f1ILII' N LI:E (4i5I:I01 t1304 JONATHAN STACHI.1:1t 'louoi:N I.. %IELS1:N Ti7AcY F.. CONNrIt TO: The Parties on the Attached Distribution List CLOSING MEMORANDUM RE: S4,00,000 Certificates of Participation (Emerald Cove Senior Citizens Housing Project) Evidencing the Proportionate Interests of the Owners Thereof in Lease Payments to be Made by the City of Huntington Beach, California, as the Rental for Certain Property Pursuant to a Lease Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach The Pre-Closing and Closing of the captioned issues are scheduled to be held in the offices of Janes Hall Hill b White, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1950, in San Francisco, on Monday, June IS and Tuesday, June 19, 1984, respectively. The Pre-Closing will begin at 1 :00 p.m. ; the Closing will begin at 9:00 a.m. Enclosed is a Schedule of Transcript Documents which sets forth the documents to be presented and/or executed prior to Closing or at Closing, This Memorandum makes references to items listed on said Schedule by the letter/number designation beside which they are listed on the Schedule. Also enclosed are final drafts of the base legal documents and draft copies of various Closing documents for which this office is responsible. Each Closing documents' is marked in the upper right-hand corner with the Schedule of Transcript Documents item number to which it corresponds. Comments regarding the Schedule and the enclosed documents should be transmitted to Mr. Adams or the undersigned at your earliest convenience. Set forth below is a description of procedures and responsibilities as they affect each Closing participant. Please note that all documents executed and i forwarded to this office prior to Closing as requested herein will be held in escrow by this office for delivery at the Closing upon consent and agreement of the parties thereto. CITY/AGENCY I. A signing session has been arranged for the undersigned to meet in the +% City offices at 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, June 13, with the Mayor, City Administrator, Senior Community Development Specialist, City Clerk, City Attorney +� i i i 1 'I l t CLOSING MEMORANDUM JUNE 6, 1984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (EMERALD COVE PROJECT) PAGE 2 i I i and Agency Special Counsel , for the execution of the following documents: (NOTE: A Notary Public, who is not one of ths- signators of any document needing notarizing, must be present at this session. ) (a) Lease Agreement, to be executed by the Mayor, City Administrator, 1 Agency Chairman and Agency Chief Executive Officer, to be attested by the City Clerk and Agency Secretary, all of whose signatures are to be notarized, and to be approved as to form by the City Attorney and Agency Special Counsel (Item A8); (b) Assignment Agreement, to be executed by the Agency Chairman and Secretary, whose signatures are to be notarized, and to be approved as to form by the Agency Special Counsel (Item A9),, (c) Trust Agreement, to be executed by the Mayor, City Administrator, Agency Chairman and Agency Chief Executive Officer, whose signatures are to be attested by the City Clerk and Agency Secretary, and to be approved as to form by the City Attorney and Agency Special Counsel (Item AID); (d) Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement, to W executed by the Mayor and City Administrator, whose signatures are to be attested by the City Cl.,rk, and to be approved as to form by the City Attorney (Item All); �'.•; (e) Deets of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement, to be '. executed by the Agency Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, whose signatures are to be attested by the Agency Secretary, whose signatures are to be notarized, and to be approved as to form by the City Attorney and Special Agency Counsel (Item A14); (f) Final Official Statement, to be executed by the Mayor of the City and the Agency Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Item A15); (g) Incumbency and Signature Certificate of City, to be executed by Mayor, City Clerk, and City Administrator (Item B1); (h) Certificate as to Arbitrage, to be executed by the City Administrator (Item B2); (i) Officers' Certificate of City, to be executed by the Cit.. ).dmi ni trator and City Clerk (Itc�, B4); (3) Incumbency and Signature Certificate of Agency, to to executed by the Chairman, Secretary, and Chief Executive Officer (Item Cl); i (k) Officers' Certificate of Agency, to be executed by the Chief Executive ' I Officer and Secretary of the Agency (Item C3); C bsm MEMORANDUM JUNE 6, 1984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (EMERALD COVE PROJECT) PAGE 3 (1) Written Request to Trustee, tj bh executed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency (Item C4); (m) UCC-1 Fi.7ancing Statements, to be executed by the Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Agency (Items C5 and C6); and (n) Requisition for Delivery Costs, to be executed by the Chief Expcutive Officer of the Agency (Item C7). 2. Please prepare and deliver to the aforementioned signing session 12 certified copies of each of the following, each certified copy to be a photocopy of a fully executed original bearing a legend (on the signature page or on a separate page attached to the copy) to the effect that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original instrument on file in the office of the City Clerk/Agency Secretary, as appropriate, to be originally executed beneath said legend by the City Clerk or Agency Secretary and over which signature the appropriate official seal is to be impressed: (a) City Resolution No. E361, "Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing and Directing Execution of Lease Agreement, Assignment Agreement, Trust Agreement, Reimbursement Agreement, Approving Form of Official Statement and Sale of Certificates of Participation with Respect to Multifamily Housing Facilities (Emerald Cove Senior Citizens Housing Project), and Approving Related Documents and Official Action" , adopted May 31, 1984 (I t em Al); (b) Agency Resolution No. 78. "Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach Authorizing and Directing Execution of Lease Agreement, Assignment Agreement, Trust Agreement, Reimbursement Agreement and Deed of Trust, Approving Fora of Official Statement and Sale of Certificates of Participation with Respect to Multifamily Rental Housing Facilities (Emerald Cove Senior Citizens Housing Project), and Approving Related Documents and Official Actions", adopted May 31 , 1984 (Item A2); (L) Agency Resolution No. 79, "Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach Establishing Emerald Cove Senior Citizens Housing Fund and Providing for the use Thereof", adopted May 31, 1984 (Item A3); and (d) Minutes of Ager�:y public hearing of March 19, 1984 (Item AS). 3. Please deliver to the aforesaid signing session a copy of the affidavit of publication of the Notice of Public Hearing of March 19 (Item A4). 1 4. Please deliver to the aforesaid signing session evidence , of, or con~•, .ments to provide, public liability and property damage insurance, fire and extended coverage insurance and rental interruption or use and occupancy insurance 4 • r 1 CLOSING ME140RANDUM JUNE 6, 1984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (EMERALD COVE PROJECT) PAGE 4 ` required pursuant to Sections 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 of the Lease Agreement and in the form required by Section 5.7 of the Lease Agreement and Section 3.2 of the Deed of Trust (Item B5). 5. Please obtain from the City's /is uran:e agent or risk manager 12 4eexecuted originals of a letter (dated the datf Clo:•ing and to be substantially �j in the form herewith enclosed, marked Item B5) pertaining to the sufficiency of the above-mentioned insurance and deliver same to the signing session. V 6. Please deliver to the aforesaid signing session 12 executed originals of the City Attorney' s opinion required pursuant to Section 7(b)(3), and of the /fit, Agency Counsel 's opinion required pursuant to Section 7(b)(4), of the Contract of .Purchase, the opinions to be dated the date of Closing (a copy of which sections are -herewith enclosed, marked Items 87 and CS). L 7. Piptie deliver to Andrew Bard and Janis Penton (see attached distribution list) a copy of the Site Appraisal required pursuant to Section 2.1(c) of the Reimbursement Agreement 8. Please advise the undersigned no later than noon on Tuesday, June 12, a1 of the amount and payee of any Delivery andl;,; Construction Costs of which you are ' G�+ aware are to be paid at Closing and for which you will rp esent an invoice at d Closing, — — 1 j IN71tY. Superior Court orTHR STATE:UF'cnIFORNIA In anti for the County of Uringe CITY OF HUNTINGTON BDCHt CITY CLERK pizWEQF PIJBIJ CATn» Public Hearing St ) Terry Park Protect County of Orange 1"s Rita J. Richter � That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen or :All the United Stater,oser the age or twenty-one years,and that I am nid a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; ► that 1 am tits principal clerk of the printer of the ri. HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW M a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City or 'stiws� nurses is as HUNTINGTON BEACH County of orange and which newspaper is published for the disem l ination of local news and intelligence of a general threat• � ter• and which new-paper at till time+ herein mentioned had asraya..tts04 pr : and still has a bona ride subscription list of paying subscribers, 00 and which newspaper has been established,printed and pub• r� t tr1�s Is hisherl at regular intervals in the said County or Orange fnz a 1tlsottD rltsl�stresr� i periott exceeding one year; that the n(,tice, of which the annexed is a printed ropy,has been published in the regular rppty end entire issue or said newspaper,and not in any iupplement 'l Yr a7�.� Ilbslt ie. ` theteor,on the following dater,to wit: L IN- March 1s 89 159 1984 is ON rroat�eessa nt� ;sea+ �, ��w Yarns pnarws. AAda K Nietrwty .. I certify(or declurt under penslty or perjury that the forego. C`tr'rdlRb gH6AL7f ::, ing is true and correct. fr~IdsesR ttgM n nxted ttl....................GARDEN GROVE ......... Hit g8.yrsYa .�tie+o�r . ' 15! March Califorr r,this. df .......198 :..... `Rita J. Richter• Signature Ok 311flj,�e A7, d1r „ 3 �c. /VOS '�8 7� 4- �aG/�y � I Form No.POP 9503 �' REQUEST FOR RL.IVELOPMENT ►IGENCY/CITY CO IL. ACTION RA 84-10 Data March 13, 1984 Honorable Mayor and City Council/Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Submitted to: Agency SubmittodLy: Charles W. Thol►-pson, City Administrator/Chief Executive Officer Prepared by! Tom Tincher, Redevelopment Coordinator Subject: APPROVAL OF FINANCING DOCUMENTS AND RELi..cD ITEMS - TERRY PARK SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT Reviewed by: Gail Hutton, City Attorney Statement of Issue, Rewmmendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue: The public hearing required before the Redevelopment Agency may lease to the City the site for the Terry Park Senior Housing Project has been duly advertized; and following this public he;.;ing, the Redevelopment Agency and Council convene in joint session to approve the following recommendations necessary to consummate financing for this project. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. , 7a RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF, THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF LEASE AGREEMENT, ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, TRUST AGREEMENT, REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, AND DEED OF TRUST, APPROVING FORM OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF . PARTICIPATION WITH RESPECT TO MULTI-FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING FACILITIES (TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT), AND APPROVING RELATED DOCUMENTS AND OFFICIAL ACTION. Approve Resolution No. 79 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESIMTSHING TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING FUND AND PROVIDING FOR THE USE THEREOF (to be funded from portion of $823,000 due from The William Lyon Company from sale of condominium site). As City Council: Approve Resolution No. 51kl RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. UTHL CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING-AAND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF LEASE AGREEMENT, ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, TRUST AGREEMENT, REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, AND DEED OF TRUST, APPROVING FORM OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION WITH RESPECT TO MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING FACILITIES (TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT), AND APPROVING RELATED DOCUMENTS AND OFFICIAL ACTION. Approve and authorize distrihution of RFP for professional management firm. Analysis The City's financing team has been working closely with staff to finalize the documents presented to the Agency/City Council at this time for consideration. These documents will authorize the sale of the tax-exempt securities which will finance the construction of the Terry Park Senior Citizen Housing Project. P10 4/e11 i I I i RA 84-10 March 13, 1984 Page 2 As the Redevelopment Agency members are aware under the terms and conditions of the Disposition and Development Agreement between the Agency and The William Lyon Company, The William Lyon Company will pay to the Agency $823,00D for the purchase of the condominium site adjacent to the Terry Park senior apartment project. The DDA requires that these funds be paid to the Agency as sales of the condominiums occur over a period not to exceed 24 months. Recently, The William Lyon Company has agreed to advance a portion u F these funds for use in the initial phases of construction of the apartments. As a result of this, the amount which raust be borrowed through the tax-exempt securities sale may be reduced. This advance contribution may be as much as $340,000. To the extent that the advance is less than this, a loan of CDBG funds will be required to be later repaid by the balance of the $823,000 due to the Agency from The William Lyon Company. By making available funds not yet due and payable to the Agency, The William Lyon Company has permitted construction to begin in advance of closing of the tax-exempt financing and reduced the total amount which must be borrowed. This will help assure that rents can be maintained at the lowest possible level, and the balance of the funds due can be used as the funding for the Terry Park Senior Housing Fund, which will provide a management, maintenance, and rent subsidy reserve over the life of the project. t Alternative Action: y r Do not approve the documents. This will pre-empt the sale of tax-exempt J securities necessary to fund this project. k Funding Source: { Tax-exempt security sale proceeds, Redevelopment Agency funds (land sale proceeds. Attachments: Deed of Trust., Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement i Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 291/84/0100 Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement Resolution No. 78 Resolution Na. 79 Resolution No. 5361 CWT:SVK:aa i MW PARK SII4IOR HOUSIM PRDJDCT } Bp,a UP MATERIAL AND FIwwIAL NOrE ooX WILL, BE DELaW ID UMER SEPARP3'E COVER. 1 i i �j t a _ 1 REQUE FOR CITY COUNC ACTION RH C4 - 1 Date March 12, 1984 _ Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by. Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Office of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subjoct: AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE RFP FOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES: TERRY PARK SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments:r' t' I ` STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Construction of the Terry Park Housing Project should commence in the immediate future. As part of this program, the City will ultimately be responsible for the operation and management of these senior housing units. To ascertain the most cost effective and efficient manner through which this responsibility may be discharged, it 13 recommended at this time that the City solicit proposals from private management companies to provide services on a contract basis to the City. RLCOMMENUATION: „I Approve and authorize the staff to distribute the attached Request for Proposals for management services for the Terry Park Senior Housing Project. ANALYSIS: The implementation of the Terry Park Senior Housing Project is well underway. The construction of the street which will provide access to this and adjacent developments has commenced, and construction of the actual housing units will be underway In the immediate future. Once construction is underway, it will be necessary to conmence the process of tenant recruitment and selection and to establish the policies and procedures through which the ongoing maintenance and management of the units will be conducted. Tenant selection and ongoing maintenance and management of the units will be the City's responsibility through a sublease from the Redevelopment Agency. So that staff may assess the most cost effective and efficient mechanism thrLJgh which to discharge this responsibility for management, it is recommended that the City solicit proposals from experienced private management companies. Information gained through this RFP process will be of assistance in establish- ing a tenant recruitment and selection process and in determining the long term management policies which will be necessary for the smooth operation of the facility. It is essential at this time to determine the likely costs of private management, should this alternative be selected, and to identify the management firm in the financing documents now in preparation. P10 4101 So than all alternatives for maintenance and management of the Terry Park Senior all Project may be properly assessed, it is recommended that an investigation of the services and costs for private management be determined at this time. -FUNDING SOURCE: No financial impact anticipated through recruitment process. Should the alternative of private management be recommended, the financial impact of this selection will be judged and a revenue source identified at the time the management company is recommended for selection. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Do not approve the RFP for distribution by staff. ATTACHMENTS: Request for Proposal, Management Services CWT:SVK:aa ' i , ' 1 ' I CITY OF HUN111100FI [BEACH .i REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL si MANAGEMENT SERVICES TERRY PARK APARTMENTS ,l Project Description The City of Huntington Beach, through its Redevelopment Agency, is planning r the construction of 164 senior citizen rental units on Agency-owned property within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area (see location map r` enclosed). -This project will consist of approximately 16 studio apartments of !+� 415 square feet and approximately 148 one-bedroom units at 600 square feet. These units will be constructed in a 2-story, walkup configuration and will be located on a site of approximately 5 acres. The project will include open i. parking, a small recreation center, trash enclosures, and landscaped grounds. � The services of a management firm are required to assist the City aad its j Redevelopment Agency with the following items: Tenant Selection ' The managment firm selected for the Terry Park Project will assist the r� City in the preparation of the following documents and the imple-.nentatioa of the appurtenant procedures: (, advertising/marketing of the project and solicitation of tenant '1 pre-applications preparation rf the pre-application form °. application s,.reening including income and asset verification t f tenant selection (based upon criteria to be prepared jointly by Agency staff and management firm) - unit/parking assignments - preparation of lease ' preparation of security deposit agreement h;l - project information sheet to be distributed to all pre-applicants » preparation of health evaluation sheet for all applicants preparation of resident information sheet for all applicantsAl" - preparation of residency policy in cooperation with Agency staff, preparation of a rent schedule based on the bedroom size and the location of the unit tenant briefing session after selection of initial tenants : 2. Ongoing Maintenance/Management f ,y l Subsequent to occupancy by the initial tenants, the management firm ►� selected will be responsible for the following processes and procedures: rent collection/delinquency and payment of expenses (utilities, trash, ` landscape maintenance, etc. ) the ongoing management and mainten mrA of the physical plant tenant recreational/educational programs c �I I i • S tenant management involvement - preparatioa V a rent increase policy ( in cooperation 7iAgency staff) prpparal.ion of i Lvnant h,in01)(1 k Irrr-I►,rr,it lon of ,In loll i1I,111 rnonituring'of programs to address special tenant needs ;t (medical/handicapped) preparation and implementation of daily health status check system 1 - preparation of eviction procedures/policies system for maintenance of a waiting list (the project contains approximately 45,613 square feet of landscape area and 129,280 square feet of paving) 3. Contents of the Proposal Each proposal should contain: - general statement of qualifications of the management firm - biography of each of the principals of the firm - identification of tire: principal who will be in charge of the Terry Park Project - identification, if possible, of the individual who will take responsibility of on-site management and d biography of this person - listing of other projects currently managed and a reference for each - samples of documents your firm has prepared for other projects as referenced in 1 and 2 above - all firms submitting proposals should include a fee quote for the ! services to be provided and, if a startup fee is to be charged, this = should be identified as a separate line item. In addition, tine fee for ongoing management of the project should be quoted on a "cost per unit per month WOE" commencing upon initial occupancy of all units will your firm be willing to guarantee rent advance to the City and be ,. responsible for debt collection from tenants with delinquent payments? If so, please identify tine cost of this service rs a separate line item in the fee quote of your proposal The management firm selected will provide management services under contract to the City of Huntington Reach. It will be necessary for the firm selected to have a business license within the City of Huntington Beach; certified participation in tine Worker's Compensation Program; provide documents of liability insurance in an amount equal to $1 million per occurrence; will be asked to hold City, its emp'�oyees, agents, and assigns harmless from any tortuous acts. It is anticipated that, after the receipt and review of all proposals, the . principals of each firm being considered will be interviewed by Redeveiopment Agency management staff. the deadline for tine submission of proposals will be 5:00 p.m., 1984; and no proposals will be accepted after this time. Tile itedevelopaient Agency reserves tine right to reject all i, proposals received. If you should have any questions regarding the . scope or nature of the services which are being solicited through this UP, or if you wish to discuss—the project in more detail, please do not hesitate to contact: r Charles P. Spencer Special Projects Coordinator 4' City of Huntington Beach � 2000 Main Street, 4th floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5542 The proposals must be received by the deadline at the location above. ' ti 1 'f r f e t i � 3 t i RFP SOCICITATiON • TERRY PARK MANAGEMENT I� Mr. Sherman Gardner Goldrich 6 Kest Management 5150 Overland Avenue Culver City, California 90320 R Mr. Byron Barker, President : Barker Management Incorporated 1720 West Bali Road Anaheim, California 92804 533-3290 (Bruce Solari & Linda Craig, U.P.) • I Mr. Owight A. Hoelscher ' Vice President, Personnel LONC0 1224 E. Wardlow Road Long Beach, Call"urnia 90807 (213) 595-7567 ; . I Mr. Bob Zinngrabe Delma Corporation 18¢11 Florida Street . f� i• Huntington Beach, California 92648 847-3515 ; Mr. Bob Ricliardson ; n� 1HR Property Management, Inc. 20062 Lawson Lane ' Huntington Beach. California 92646 9611-4050 . t V i e Order No. Escrow No. Loan No. WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: j Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency City Clerk's Office City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926 �ant:t AuovL THIS LINE Fan FIEC011DLFt'S U51. MAIL TAX STATEMENTS Dp�yEMARY TRANSFER TAX $__1 .5.. _U K.Computed on the consideration or value of property comreved;OP ......Computed on the consideration or value ions lions or enrumbramees remaining at time of sale, I t ' / . ._4 /�� �(f�jV Y Signature or ualerant or A„nt doistmining tea —Firm Norm - �f� 640�uii GRANT DE ED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, a public agency of the State of California. hereby GRANTISI to THE WILLIA14 LYON COMPANY the real property in the City of Huntington Beach, County of ORANGE State of California, described as that portion of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter section 35, township 5 south, range 1.1 west, in the Rancho Las Holsas, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Tract 12061, as shown on a map recorded in Hook 521, pages 33, 34 and 35 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of thel County Recorder of said County. "Excepting therefrom all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances and minerals lying below a depth of 500 feet from the surface of said land, but without the right of surface entry at any time upon said land or within the top 500 feet thereof, for the purpose of exploiting for, developing, producing, removing and marketing said substances, " APPROVED AS x0 YOM (SAIL MUTTON City Attornoy Doputy C�tp Att01' ►P r. HE PMENT G-. Y OF THE CITY U14 GT B IFORNIA Dated_-_-_._ 0-7. STATE OF CALIF IA 1 COU before me,t ndersigned.a Notary Public In and for said State.per. Agency Clerk sonattyeppeared_. - _ _ - -.. .. .. --.. pefronally known to me lot pr^d to me on the bans of satisfactory r OFFICIAt SELL evideire)to Do the persorilsl wh namelsl Is/are subscribed to the =� CONNIE A. BROCKWAY ;'{ i NOTARY rUmliC • CALlil;f.'111A within Instrument and r,ckr"edged t e that ht!fshe/they executed 't paII:CIP L OfFICE IN x the same l�; ��'T" OMNGE COU'JTY 1�k MY COMMISSION ExPIKIS OCT 10 19 a WITNESS my hand and official seal. $IQnatUtP— (This apes tot official notarial ,seals I _ . ._.. 1007 1519;' MAII. IAY '0 ATi .mrNTS A!� ninrr.Trn ,znntir , C Oidnr No. L•.t:rnw No. Loran No. WHEN RECOnDEO MAIL TO: Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency City Clerk' s Office City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street f Huntington Beach, CA 926 1R •;rnct AltrvL tots LINL rot; ntconot n-t; ua MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: ' DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 1.».49.5.0.O......................... r x..Computed on the eonsideratlon or value of property corwered Or i ......Computed on the consideration or value fast liens or tncu• brr•rr• rermarning at time of sale. ` .�. slan�lu.—i of q�tlAient of APint ditairnleina tart Fle—046—o �y L Cum 1.Yt}N b/s r , ,r P) GRAM' D E E n i}} FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ►rcript of which is hereby acknowledged, the Redevelopment Agenc;• f� of the City of Huntington Beech, a public agency of the State of Californi.k P hereby GRANTi51 to THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY I i I r s 13 t'Hg uMdel?. „�c flEs����ro•s. r the real property in the City of Hunt i ng ton Beach, County of ORANGr. State of California. descrlhlyl .t that portion of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter section �I 35, township 5 south, ranee 11 west, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, describes as follows: ; Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Tract 12061 , as shown on a map recorded in Book 521, pages 33, 34 and 35 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of then County Recorder of said County. 1 "Excepting therefrom all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances and minerals lying below a depth of 500 feet from the surface of said land, but without the right of surface entry at any time upon said land or within the top 5GO feet thereof, for the purpose of exploiting for, developing, producing, removing and marketing said substances." APPROVED AS TO Z01W GAIL UUTTON City Attornoy n�putq Citq Atto � �� THE PMENT G Y OF THE CITY UNT•INGT B LIFORNIA Datrd By: ` STATE OF CALIF IA uu r On.. 1 moo, Toy By holore me,ih ndrervgnett n Notary public in wvi tnr Bard.lime.per. Agency Clerk +nnatly n:t Ty _() �_,V\ INf10nAlly known 10 me IM pr r'd to me on the h,ta`s of Sa/rstlCtOry OrflCIAL SEAL A� t �. nvit"MA)10 hn the pnttnnleil whn, narneW lvn,e cuhcrnherl to Ihrr ��``(/ ,r r 1:04. 41E A• DIOCF.=y fit.t �i%fi NotAtr rLIV IC • C%•ti;�►•tI•� ;r within Msltvment nn3 atMnowletl0ed to1VA 1ha1 he 1%ho/lhny rr.rrcutwd V `\�+;!3.1 (RIt:CIt:.l O!F ICi IN ti `r.' ,.• thesamn. 1; ` OAANGE CC�ltytY 1 A!Y COMMISSION EaPIIII$OCT IO 1�qS 1 WI1NE5 i my hgrr)Ar 1 ollirt.tt anal r`Ze'to'Ca:�e'•�r'r:G'.Ct'.."..'✓-•err !+rrlMhpn Ithr. rl'on lot olfrcrrrl notntrrtt t,r,n �d9 � t Wild 10 fit ^t•:�--.'-._lam- _. �.t��'.ti; ,'t.+-...! •N.•.N 1• , •Y....��..-."�.�....�.-..�.�- ' rlw� • . ..•11• �w'+•rr..%� 1i• .... f 1+ •� IIN CL Ir►•31A/ /AI; I I\IV wI MITI Iw rw1•Ir 1/1 r11 M•.\1 Nrr1 _Yl] 1 ..r•.N•I NI"N II.rNr1 N•Nr,• M�\.'•IY`.I•.N'...Ir.lr .r••.n•Ir•A r•Ir1.w,•Nr•1•.•F.IIr Nn M .' ' .-- w I•r•II.4.. r r•r r rr i+M••r.• • 11.1•, • r•rV � 1 •I�•I0 r rr N• ••N•r A rrlrrr 14• •1••.w•I/M•M•IY•.1•r/ • 1 Yr1•in r //1 I • • . , • ' • . • - •• • � I Mlw IM�.rn II•I.11\�r1 711� I.n 1•I•,•.r 11• . ,.�• Y• Al.i• .r•I\h rh �1 ' 1 • •• Y'1 n1..111.. /III- t• �. 1 •I• o-r.Nr•.. a.r/I•u I+r j1 •/ ` r N1w IM•r IIN•IIY A•.\ rN VII �1y`S . • • r� �: rl at�! M.�lt .a% 1....rN1..• •�r �-:1• - '..\ •h . •L-• •1 l 1 /1 IYw..I.M N r••._I•.•Y INr • N./M••J.J. , • I• f+•r1 r r, Ir�r� I II M rlN w. � •� , • ♦1 rlrl rMN. N/'•yY1I Yr -.!_:psi�r•�.r � � ' "�•' •. � _ ' � �i� ..,/,.•n .:... r�.....�,,, ... 1}111 t � J:..r► :Lam•• _./1 ••1• 1::�,— /... .v'r. . � •I•r wI rl•• h••M_..NII VN•I (Awmv rrt ` A-/•� ! /4'.• .f r wMn Tr.w!w.r�+�! 1�r,��%.(� A•l�•�4..Ji �i,'".aH YlMll/�� /f_{i.,1 w �.. f,u.,ns !c!,n,.l flr� �; ► 1 I ►- ` R 2 — _ 1 ny cs t� m r f!E R2 ? i 'M1-Co r _ R2 ' "' R3'ICa' v ' _. I t ..... •• 1 � --- — - tpJR2•Pp,. i .CF-�� M . MI-CD r---;, R, +: MFCD i� M' I=R1 IRA-0-CD C2 Ri YRIr 7,. _ai�c e. RI ,•. _— .RI RI ( �• -� MI-CD] f1i LRI hR—�' - +•a•ca i: ��----� G4 t ti_• S I �✓" RI R3 RI R R2 r11' •f —1 TI. IZObl (Poirrtom Of TTIICJSS) h.>",tn.cto•r,sty►; HUNTINGTON MACH PLANNING DIVISION i i - - --- ---- - --- REQUEST "N REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AC' JN b RH 83-22 Date December 2, 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Cha rman and Redevelopment Agen APpBtLVE BY J'TY COUNCIL Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato /'�� �, _____tv---- Prepared by: Affice of Business & Industrial Enterpr s C1TY CLERK Subject: EXPANSION AND FINANCING OF TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT Statenxtnt of Issue, Recommbndation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attach nents: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to the direction given by the City Council to expedite the construction of the Terry Park senior Citizens Housing Project, staff is proposing several recommendations which, if adopted, would finalize the scope of the project and allow work to be commenced immediately. RECO14MENDATION: Agency - 1) no not include the Collins-Zweibel site in the project at i:his time, but authorize staff to continue to work with Warner, Arandll and Collins-Zweibel and attempt to establish a viable coordina':ed or consolidated development plan for the balance of the projes:t area. 2) Amend the Lyon Company's Disposition and Development Agree-vent to provide for the expansion of the project to include the JoLly site and incorporate the 8% fee for the work completed within the expanded area. (See Attachment #1) . 3) Authorize staff to proceed with structuring the financing program for the Terry Park Rental Project, as discussed and outlired by Attachment #2. City Council - 1) Authorize the appropriation of $105,000 irc H.C.D. Local Oition funds to allow for the immediate close of escrow on the Jcliy site, so that work can commence in this expanded area. f AIIALYSIS: Work on the overall street Improvements . utilities and grading of the sitefs is to commence Monday, December 5, 1983. Working drawinc•s for the rental units are being finalized and it is expected that they will be through plan check in the very near future. Bond Counsel and our underwriter are both prepared to commence immediately with the 3rafting of the documents needed to finance the project which could take from 60 to 90 days to complete the overall process. In order to move forward t^ Flo 4181 f 4 J r RH 83-22 December 2, 1983 Page Two in each of these areas, it is important that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency consider the recommendations as outlined above and take the appropriate actions, at this time. FUNDING SOURCE: Community Development Block Grant Local Option funds and future rents and other project revenues. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1) Do not appropriate H.C.D. Local Option Funds for -the purchase of the Jolly site and wait and fund out of "bond" proceeds. Such an action would, however, preclude our ability to move ahead immediately in an effort to clear the site and get all the preliminary work completed by the time we are ready to commence construction cf the rental units. 2) Delay overall construction while we pursue alternatives to incorporate the Collins-Zweibel site into Phase I of: the project. 3) Not amend the Lyon Company agreement and solicit interest frc:m other developers or contractors for the construction of the project. 9) Ask Bond Counsel and Financing Consultant/Underwriter to pursue other alternatives for financing the project. I ATTACHMENTS: 1) Conceptual Development Plan 2) Talber— Beach Project Financing and Terry Parx Senior Citizens Housing Rental Schedule i' i EX/ST�'�S/C� IN/,'USTiQl�3L. Q1� 70NEi N i• �� i 1 bo,�a�EC 41/0 ' J 1J-L--t-I 7,fRRY E Y COWCEPMA!_ DEvELoPME/YT /l'LRIv -75 j •. \y ,. ,\��✓, i r f ATTACHMENT #2 TALBERT-BEACH PROJECT FINANCING TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING RENTAL SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT FINANCING PROJECT COSTS Unit Construction 132 1-Bed. x 600 sq.ft. x $30 -- $ 2,376,000 32 studio x 415 sq.ft. x $30 - 398,400 2300 sq.ft. Rec. Center x $20 - 46,000 $ 2,320,400 Offsite Improvements Utilities, Parking, etc. $ 258,000 Landscaping 410,000 Project wall (6' x 760 @ $23/lineal ft) 17,480 $ 685,480 Contractor Fee $ 181,300 Misc. Expenses Y 62,820 TOTAL ACQUISITION & CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 3,750,000 Less Interest Income During Construction: - 165,000 Net Amount Required From Debt Issue: $ 3,585,000 FINANCING COSTS Issuance Expenses Debt Advisory Commizsion $ 51000 Trustee Fee 10,000 Bond Printing 10,000 Official Statement Printing 51000 Bond Counsel 30,000 Underwriter's Discount (2.5%) 106,250 Insurance Premium (2.2%) 93,500 Rating Agency Fees 5,250 Subtotal: $ 265,000 Funded Interest (12 months) $ 400,000 TOTAL DEBT ISSUE SIZE $ 4,250,000 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUES NEEDED TO $ 433,000 AMORTIZE DEBT (9h% over 30 yrs.) _ -== -2- l. r r I a TAI,BERT--BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINANCING PROJECT FUND. - H.C.D. 894771 Sr. citizens Housing Site $ 199,800 894814 Land Cost Writedown 766,000 894832 Relocation Assistance 33,500 894833 Local Option 1051000 $ 1,105,000 1 PROJECT COSTS Property Acquisition I' Jolly $ 340,000 Kincaid 79,428 MacGowan 77,125 t Bernet 6,538 ; Elliott 6,538 Lindsay 6 ,538 King 6,538 i! Hermansen 42,85G Chilton 6,538 Misc. 4,0(}7 $ 576,100 Relocation ?assistance Jolly $ 15,500 Kincaid 4,500 s( MacGowan Tenant 4 ,500 ►:r Jolly Tenants 91000 $ 33 ,500 I f , Public Im2rovements $ 478,000 Cont in ens 17,400 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 1,105 ,000 4, 1 ! 1 �I n i PROPOSED RENTAL SCHEDULE TERPY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS RENTAL HOUSING PROJECT Average monthly rent per unit needed $ 220* to amortize debt Estimated monthly maintenance 50 and management fee per unit Assessment to cover 5% 15 vacancy Factor TOTAL AVERAGE MONTHLY RENT: $ 285 *Asnumptions 1) Studio units 25% less rent than 1-bedroom 2) Second floor units 15% less rent than ground floor ANTICIPATED MONTHLY RENTS ** lst year After 1) Ground floor, 1 bedroom = $ 315 $ 275 2) Ground floor, studio = $ 250 $ 210 3) 2nd floor, 1-bedroom - $ 280 $ 240 4) 2nd floor, studio = $ 225 $ 185 **After the first year of operation, monthly rents could be reduced by an average of $40 per unit with the interest earned on the investment of the condo land sale proceeds or a continuance of the above rents would result in a positive annual cash flow of $80,000. t r i r CITY OF HUN'1` INN T ON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 P.0.Box 190 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 12, 1982 Dear Property Owner: The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach has initiated proceedings for the adoption of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Plan in the City of Huntington Beach. The Agency and the City Council will hold a public hearing on the plan on September 7, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 2000 Main Street. Uotice of this joint public hearing is enclosed for your in- i formation. The purpose of the redevelopment plan is to eliminate the conditions, as described in Health and Safety Code Sections 33031 and 33032, which have prevented private citizens and business enterprises from developing the project area in accordance with the adopted General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach as amended. The Agency will encourage existing property owner participation in carrying out the redevelopment plan. Staff has already begun the process of meeting 0 th individual owners to solicit their interests and thoughts, and additional meetings will be I held in the near fu•61,.re. While property in the project area will be subject to acquisition by purchase or condemnation, the Agency has made no determination at this time to acquire any property which you currently own. If you decide not to participate or the Agency should determine the need to acquire your property so that the overall project might be carried out, it is required by law that the full fair market value of the property be established by an r.ppraisal and the Agency would then meet with you, as the property owner, in an effort to reach an agreement on the purchase price. The Agency is further obligated to provide relocation assistance to any person, family or business which must be relocated as a result of such acquisition. The Agency welcomes any comments or advice you have en the Redevelopment Plan or the Draft EIR which you might provide by writing to the Agency at City Halt, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. Copies of the Redevelopment Plan, the Draft EIR and related documents are available in the Office of Busine,s and Industrial Enterprise at City Hall. Tom T ncher, Director of Business and In0strial Enterprise I TT:jb ;f i Tch-phone(71.1)536.554 j�,glsti Pours irpia2/ 1, LEGAL NOTICE "9 NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUNTINGTON BEACH-RE P C F THE PR POSED TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington i Beach, California, and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency have set September 7, 1982 at 7:30 p.m, as the time, and the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 as the place for a joint public hearing to be held by the City Council and the Redevelop- ment Agency to consider the approval and adoption of the proposed Talbert- Beach Redevelopment Plan. The Agenp will implement the adopted Plan if, after the joint public hearing, the City Council approves and adopts the ' proposed Redevelopment Plan. The purpose of the joint public hearing is to consider: 1. The Redevelopment Plan submitted by the Agency which proposes as its scope and objective to eliminate unsafe conditions, improve overall appearance, encourage participation, encourage new development, provide public improvements, promote parcel cunsoliciation and pro- vide affordable housing. 2. The report of the Agency to the Lity Council on the proposed Redevelop- ment Plan includes, but is not limited to, the report and reconrienda- tion. of the Planning Commission on the Plan and the report of the { County Fiscal Review Committee (if any). + 3. The Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Plan. 4. All evidence and testimony for and against the adoption of the Redevelop- ment Plan. • At the above stated day, hour and place, ElV and all persons having any objec- tions to the proposed Redevelopment elan or to the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the Agency and the Council and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adoptea. At any time not later than the hour aforesaid set for hearing, any person objecting to the proposed Redevelopment Plan may file in writing with the City Clerk a statement of his objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Any person or organization desiring to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to be heard. At the aforesaid hour the Council shall proceed to hear and pass upon all written and oral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. The proposed Redevelopment Plan and Environmental Impact Report are now an file and open- for public inspection in the office of the Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. Every property ormer, business or tenant interested in becoming a participant, f pursuant to the Participation Rules adopted by the Agency, should submit to the Age►icy a completed "Statement of Interest to Participate" within sixty (60) days from the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the Agency. The boundaries of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are as defined in Exhibit "A" as follows: �•, Exhibit "A" UMI nr•.30UPTIM TAMMT-13rACII TUMI ►FLOTI l" PIZt W- I' AREA Those ports:hs of .Sections 35 and 261 Zt mship 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rarcho Tea Bolsa Chica =1 N-incho IKas Solsas in the City of tiuntirxTton Beach, `County oP 4rmigap State of California, as slxxa:z on a map recorded in Book 51► page 13 of Miscellaneous Wins in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described 'as follows: Beginning at the southeast cvrnar of said Section •26; thence South 890 54' 23" West 1320.10 feAt alocxl the south line of said section, said south line also being the centerlihe of T�i]W-rt Avenue, to the True Point of Beginning, :hence North 00 Ol' 16" East 50 fmt to a line parallel with m d 50 feet north u asured.at j right angles from the cenLer.lity� of Talbert Ave ntle; thence along said mentioned 1 parallel line North 890 54' 23" Fast 800 feet to the intersection with a line J parallel with and 10.00 feet east measured at right angles from the east line of Lot No. 3, Block C of Tract rb. 172 as skwn on a chap recorded in Book 12, page 21, of Mi,cellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said mentioned parallel. line South 00 05' 37" Fast 300 feet to a point on a curve concave easterly having a radius of 273.00 feet; theme soutlrrrty along said Lmrve through a central angle: of 15" 33' 49" an arch distance of 74.7 feet to a point on a tangent reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 327.00 feat, a radial to said paint }cars North 740 20' 34" East; thence southerly along said reverse curve through a central angle: of 150 33' 49" an arc distance of 88.82 feet to a line parallel. wi.th and 32 feet Fzst measured at right angles fran the west line of Int: No. 02, mock C, of said mentioned Tract No. 172; thence southerly along last said tnention(xI parallel line south 00 05' 37" east 249 feet to the intersection wi th the easterly prolongation of the ncrth boundary line'of Tract No: 8197 as slkxan on a mal) recorded in Bcok 452, page 44 of Miscellancous Maps in the Office of the County Iecorder of said County; then along saic; mmitioned prolongation and nortItirly line south 890 55' 44" west 822 feet to tlu: west: boundary line of said Tract No. 6197; thence along said west: boundary line south 011 Oil 16" 116st 690 feet to the sough right=-of-u-a_v line of Taylor Drive, i a street Wing 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said south' right-of-way line south 890 56' 05" west 660 feet to the int:ersectien with the southerly prolongation of the east line of Paxcels Nos. 7-10 as sf=n can A map filed in Boot: 79, page 15 of Parcel Maps in t%ie Office of the County Recorder' of said Wb nty; thence along said prolongation and cast line north 00 Ol' 151- cast 1014 feet to a line parallel with and 336 feet south measured at right angles £rcm the centerline of Talbert nvenuA; thence along last said mentioneaal parallel line north 890 56' 37" east 660 fctit• to t:lx: m-,5t line of Tract No. .172; thence along said west line north 0" Ol' 16" east 335 feet to the True Point: of Beginning. O ja; IL Xlet kit 0 O O G O r QD QD "Ain CL i V.» .�. .:.• d. K 'IL4 w.K%.ti., is �� �.K . ® ff IV �► �'"' 40 w ' w r.wn 30 — — 1%a CITY OF HUNTINGTaM BEACH `t INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNI"TON BUM .�,,,,�� TO Alicia M. Wentworth From q Tom Tincher, Director City Clerk Business & Industrial Enterprise Subject FISCAL IMPACT REPORIS FOR MAIN-PIER, Date October 6, 1982 YORKTOWN-LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH PROJECTS a DpcVieW Attached are the Fiscal Impact Reports for each of the above named projects. These reports should be inserted as Appendices "B" in the "Reports to the City Council". TT:,jb attachments i f I i I I f V. A. NEIM AUDI TOR•CONTPOLLER FINANCE pUllhlNO 430 NORTH 9ROAD'AAV 2 1 J v P.O, pOx 561 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92102 s 3 F1/AN 04 Er- TFLEPmONF: 034-2450 AREA CODE 714 OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER September 23, IM SUBJECT: City of Huntington Beach Com—unity Redevelopment Agency - Talbert Beach Project Pursuant. to Section 33320 at seq. of the California Health and Safety Code, you will find enclosed your copy of the Fiscal Impact Report for the subject redevelopment agency. Further inquiries may be directed to the: _ County of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office Attn: Tax Suction 630 N. Broadway P. O. Box 567 Santa Ana, CA 92702-0567 r� Judy Cale Accountant Tax Section JG:el £nclosurn5 { A, 1 go TABLE I - HEALTH 6 SAFETY CODE 33328 (A) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - TALBERT REACH PROJECT 1982•-83 BASE YEAR ASSESSMENT ROLL Secured Assessed Value - Local ?:oll $1,244,051 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 776,.832 Total Assessed Value within the Project $2.020,863 * Not Available At This Time - • is . TABLE II - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (2) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - TALBERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF IDENTIFICATION OF TAXING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE PROJECT The District numbers and the taxing agencies' names aic: 001E County Inside Excluding CSFP (County General) 054A Huntington Beach City 3003 Coast Comm nitf College Dist. - Basic Area 310A Huntington Beach Union Iiigh School District 313E ocean View School District - Basic 630A School Modification Aid (Dept. of Ed.) 601A School Institution Tuition Tax (Dept. of Ed.) 707A Orange County Transit District 710A Orange County Flood Control District 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches & Parks District 744A Orange•County Vector Control Dist. 820P t•7WD-1*1DOC - Ramainder Area Bf,3B KIDOC - Original Area 918A Orange County Sanitation Cist. #3 960A Orange County Water District 901A Orange County Water District - Water Reserve r i t 'TABLE III - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (C) CITY OF HMZTINGTON BEACH - TALBERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF 1982-83 BASE YEAR REVENUE EACH DISTRICT CAN EXPECT FBOM WITHIN THE PROJECT Bonded Basic Levy Indebte3ness Total Fund Dist. Aqency Name Revenue Revenue 82-83 Revenue ` 0049-01 054A Huntington Beach City $ 3,863.37 $1,076.14 $ 4,939.51 0072-16 820P 2•UM-Itr.-MOC - Reminder Area - - - 0075-01 863B M'riDOC - Original Area - 360.32 360.32 0100-03 001E Orange County 3,040.23 9.23 3,049.46 2291-01 600A Department of Education 248.30 - 248.30 4001-01 710A Orange Cousity Flood Control Dist. 518.08 50.46 568.54 4051-01 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches & Parks Dist. 336.15 - 338.15 5321-01 744A Orange County Vector Control District 37.72 - 37.72 5331-01 707A Orange County Transit District 86.8q - 86.86 5881-01 960A Orange County Water District 149.87 - 149.87 5901-01 961R. Orange County Water District - Water Reserve 2.25 - 2.25 7141-01 310A Huntington Beach Union H.S. Dist. 4,237.49 177.54 4,415.03 7311-01 300B Coast Coarsunity College Dist. 1,790.15 - 1,750.15 8431-01 3138 Ocean View School Dist. - Basic 5,161.56 2,267.64 7,429.20 9041-01 91s". Orange County Sanitation District 93 734.60 21.14 755.94 TPA TOTAL $20,208.83 $3,962.47 $24,171.3C t I i I I i a TABLE; IV - HEALTH 5 SAFETY CODE 333213 (D) CITY OF RUNTINGTON BEACH - TALSERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF TOTAL AD VALOREM REVENUE EACH PROJECT HAS AVAILABLE FROM WITHIN AND OUTSIDE THE PROJECT The revenue data necessary to complete this section of the Fiscal Review Reports does not currently exist because of the impact of Assembly Bill G. An inordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Auditor-Controller's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Report dues not contain the total Ad Valorem Revenue information for the projecL. area. There has been included, however, a supplemental table of comparative assessed values for each taxing district to give a relative indication of Base Year Revenue percentage given up to the CRA. See Table IV(D) , Supplement. TABL£ IV - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33328 (D) SUPPLEMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE#ACH - TAL•BERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF BASE YEAR 1982-83 CPA A.V. PERCENTAGL RELATIONSHIP TO 'TOTAL TAXING DISTRICT'S A.V. Taxing District's Percent of A.V. Within the Taxing District's Project AV Dist. Agency .Jame Project A.V. - County wide to District 00iE County Inside Excl"ding CSFP (County General) $2,020,883 $49,736,868,136 0.0041 054A Huntington Beach City 2,020,883 5,883,904,006 0.03:3 300E Coast Community College Dist. - Basic Area 2,020,883 16,.62,650,086 0.0121 310A Huntington Beach Union High School Dist. 2,020,883 9,172,131,892 0.0220 313E Ocean View School Dist. - Basic 2,020,883 2,627,919,928 0.0769 600A School t•.odification Aid (Dept. of Education) . 2,020,883 70,394,280,403 0.0029 601A School Institution Tuition Tax (Dept. of Education) 2,020.883 70,394,280,403 0.0029 707A Orange County Tranzit Dist. 2,020,883 70,394,280,403 0.0029 710A Orange County Flood Control Dist. 2,020,883 70,394,280,403 0.0029 713A Orange County Harbors, Beaches 6 Parks Dist. 2,020,883 70,35y,280,403 0.0029 744A Orange County Vector Control Dist. 2,020,883 70,377,080,051 0.0029 820P r.61)-t•i-y'DOC-Remainder Area (Metropolitan Water Dist.) 2,020,883 48,706,913,761 0.0042 863B Municipal Water Dist. Orange Coi,nty - Original Area 2,020,883 48,666,757,603 0.0042 910B Orange County Sanitation Dist. 13 1,600,243 15,408,800,441 0.0117 960A Orange County Water Dist. 2,020,883 47,365,335,538 0.0043 961A Orange County Water Dist. - Water Reserve 2,020,883 46,989,210,975 0.0043 one percent 1.0000 -- t TABLE VI - HEALTH & SAFETY CODE 33329 (E) CITY OF MWINGTON BEACH - TALBERT BEACH PROTECT REPORT OF AGENCY'S REVENUE I13 FIRST YEAR The Audi tor-Controller has been advised by the Huntington Beach Community Redevelopment Agency that no major struc- tures and improvements will be made within the Project boundaries during the first year, so therefore we anticipate a conservative growth in value of the area within the Project boundaries to increase X only 5.7 percent. I Total 1982-83 Base Year Revenue $24,171.30 . . Total Expected Percentage Incre-ise 3.7% in Value 1983-84 Increment Tax Revenue Estimate $ 1,377.76 1 TABLE IV - HEALTH & SAFETY- CODE 33328 (F) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - TALBERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF ASSESSED VALUATION? BY BLOCK WITHIN THE PROJECT Health and Safety Code, Sectiori33328 (f) requires: "The assessed valuation of the project area, by block, for the preceding rive years, except for state assessed property on the board roll." Zhe assessed valuation data necessary to complete this section of the fiscal Review Report does not exist because the valuation files maintained by the county do not contain historical assessed values by block. An inordinate manual effort and expense would be required of the County Assessor's and County Auditor's staff to gather any reliable substitute data. Therefore, the Fiscal Review Report does not contain the preceding five-year assessed valuation information for the project area. I I TABLE V - HEALTH 6 SAFETY CODE 33328 (G) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - TALBERT BEACH PROJECT REPORT OF 1982-83 ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET Secured Assessed Value - Local Roll $23.975,439 State Board of Equalization - Public Utility Roll Unsecured Assessed Value - Local Roll 2,277,916 Total assessed Value Within 300 Feet $26,253,355 • Not Available At This Time I I l i REQUEb T FOR CITE' COUNCIL ACTION Date _August 26, 1992 %bmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council A P111. J� I ((�� 4,72 Submitted by: C. W. Thampson, City Adrinistrato `' -..... ....""."�...17 Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public I%brks ` ctrY ci.s: Subject: Improvewnt Plans for the Beach,/'Talbert Redevelopment Project Area; CC 612 Statement of luue, Recommendetion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: OITEI+lEIV OF ISSUE: Qn July 20, City sent out requests for proposals from qualified civil.engineeribg films for preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimates and legal descriptions of street aligmients in the Beach/Talbert Redevelopment Project Area. Proposals were received and reviewed by City staff on August 23, 1982. iMF>`IDATICN: Approve selection of Bmerald Engineering to prepare impzovernent plans for the Beach/ Talbert Redevelopment Project Area. ANALYSIS: Ki f its redeveloprent efforts, the Huntington Paach Redevelopment Agency has desig- nated a project area nee: the southwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Beach Boulevard. The objectives of the proposed Redevelopment Project include " and required public. improvements � prwidi,sg adequate p�+ls its to encourage ,tea construction by private enterprise..." In order to prepare plans for public bqxvvemnts, the Citysent out requests to 9 �8 for �'OpO8d.�8 Six civil engineering r eng irsy firms. Of the sL�t, four firms responded with proposals. Firm Time to Complete Cost Esc Zrr"ald Engineering 5 weeks RM Eng in 90-12 $ 8,000 Donald E. Stevens 21,000 E�9ineerirsg 90 days 21,000 Hunsaker and Associates, Inc. 10 weeks 28,000 Emerald Engineering submitted a canpetent and complete proposal with the shortest time of empletion and the lowest cost estimate. FUNDIM SCUPCE ALIT M: I. Seelect one of the other firms 2. Deny approval of all four firms and readvartise 3. Deny approval of all four firms and postpone or delete the project ATIAMERr: pox to Project Area Map CWT:PEC:LE:jy PI0,181 sa afilal■rnweat�lra�aia�■ri�at � I'� io '+Y r .r._s• .t. la .. F.i1. it.:o. _•r_.fr .9r__' •.ia_.it.R_a..Sv._i_Io..'e w r�ii�f�13'�r0 r ..r._�.��. ..:��►_ie .iM i_3n_:I.:s�_i..:�...is:r. ' ��s�.i�� .a.w.i+._i..�a.ie..�_.w.w..i•_i+ .�_7r.- � �, _x .�.r. �•.. .:�►_:�c_iti.'r._:•_.i_:+►_i1 _r_.,e.+ it_ir.st.is_}a_r_w:i� • ,�� y, _.t.ja-i•,. ,w.2 .%t_i»w.:.W_.io_3t.is..ae.:�.Ye_i� . .ie.'r._ire.i�r.i_ ._i+..r..k.Y.�'r._'s._Y.:•r.:�r. p;.rwx so ' •5ew...4 t'isst6l• r � . - 1 j •04• . . PARK ••W jur"Woomoom Swot 1[—or ER Le � __K_ TrtC• rwt '— ' aasaa�assla��fii� 3t l; 03 ALBERT CH PROJEll�jT 11049 CATV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MU�111NG70N 11A01 To Charles W. Thompson ftom F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Requested Funding for Professional Date August 27, 1982 Service: Pertinent to the Beach/ Talbert Redevelopment Project Area FIR 1 83-16 i i in response to the Public Works Deprrtment, a Financiai impact Report has been pre- pared and submitted relative to the City's funding request frr civil engineering ser- vices associated with the Beach/Talbert Redevelopment Project Area (CC612). It has been estimated that the lowest acceptable bid will not exceed $8,000. Sufficient monies are available in the Housing and Community Development Land Acqui- sition Account #894805 for this purpose. Should the City Council approve this project, the unaudited, unencumbered balance in the acci.unt will be reduced to $488,400. fr F. B. Arguello Chief of Administrative Services FBA/AR/cg i I � 2 1 �..� PUS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL. IMPACT REPORT Project Name Professional Services Pertinent to Beach/lalbert Redevelopment Project Description Requested funding for this project. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 .1 One-Time Costs Lan urn. , ac Prot. Acquisition Construction ties, E ui ment Services Total Cost 8joo 1.2 Recurring Annual Costs Additions Mater als 8 utside Payroll Personnel Su lies Services Revenues Total Cost WANES&" 1.3 Replacement/Renews) Costs NIA i II 2. INDIRECT COSTS Loss of City's earning capability due to expenditure of funds. i r inancia I Impact Report e^,, Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A i 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Approval of the funding request will allow for the timely preparation of plans. � §Recs, et al relative to the Beach/Talbert Redeveloement Program and for the rrr rr� r rr•• - • City to gain the financial benefit of engaging the services of the lowest acceptable I ! EroEosal for this particular project. i 5. PROJECT USAGE Daily. 1. i 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to City Council approval and award of the bid. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT Rejection of the project may result In future similar services costing the City substantially more than the proposals tendered thus far. . , REQUEb ( FOR C11 Y COUNCIL ACTION Date August 26, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: C. W. 11,c ,son, City P&Linistrator Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Improvanent Plans for the Beach/Talbert Redevelopment Project Area; CC 612 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATF1 EUr OF ISSUE: On July 28, 1982 the City sent out requests for proposals fr -m qualified civi'. engineering firms for preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimates aril legal descriptions of street allgri*nents in the Beach/Iralbert F2eclevelopmrit Project Area. Proposals were received and reviewed by City staff on August 23, 1982. RDM'%1%IE MTION-. Approve :hz sclocticn ur- 1hr-rald Engineerirx3 to prepare .improvanent plans for the Beach/ Talbert F.c-A1cc ,elolxrcnt Project Area. ANALYSIS: As part of its redevelopment efforts, the Itun`:ington Beach Rcdcveloprrcnt Agency has desig- natN a project area near the souLh.+est corner of Talbert: Avenue and Beac:ri Boulevard. 'Ilse objectives of the propozcd R.r:clevelopru--nt Project include! "providing adequate parcoIs and requixed public improvc3nents to encourage new construction by private enterprise. . ." In order to prepare plans for public imlzovement:s, t:he City sent out- requests for proposals to six civil engineering firms. Of the ::ix, four firms responded toit i proposals. Firm Time to Ccmplete Cost rstimte. Emerald Engineering 5 Meeks 8,000 M13 Engineering 90-120 clays 24,000 Donald E. Stevens Engineering 90 days 21,000 Flunsaker and Associates, Inc. 10 wcol:s 28,000 Ehx-raid rr lnrucrina sulxrtittecl a r : 'e ar ►�r ' K3 ca l�e, nt and c .1 lete proposal with the shortest titre of completion aril the lahtst cost esthuLe. FUNDING SOUECT., I la) Fund ALTt.RNATIVE WTIoNS: 1. Select one of the 001er fitins 2. D2oy approval of all four firs and readverr_ise 3. Deny approval of all four firms and postpone or delete the project A'ITACIMENT: F.I.R. LlgT:PEC:U-,• •JY P10 4181 REQUEST t-OR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Date _ Au4ust 31, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City AdministratQ�i�17 Prepared by: Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject. ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTING PROCEDURES rg D o&p1:) 9—7- 2-- Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: California Community Redevelopment Law and C.E.Q.A require that the Redevelopment Agency adopt environmental impact reporting procedures. The attached resolution simply states that the Agency will utilize the procedures which are currently being followed by the City and that the Redevelopment Agency will serve as a "local agency" pursuant to C.E.Q.A. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution adopting the existing City procedures for preparing and proces- sing environmental impact reports as those which the Redevelopm-nt Agency hds and will follow. ANALYSIS: (same as above) ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: None. Th, Agency must adopt the procedures prior to consideration of the EIR's which have bppn prepared for the proposed redevelopment plans. ATTACMENTS:' s . 1. Resolution ' 2. Procedures CWT:TT:3b t 1 f , i Plo 4/81 ,J 1 ' a REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPFLN'T AGENCY AC1ION Date Auhust 31, 1982 Submitted to: Nonorabig Chairperson and Redevelopment 'ieyrcy p( Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator hl,' Prepared by: ' om Tincher, Director of Business and Ind-•stri i i Enterprise Subject: APPROVAL OF TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PI AN AND CrRT'IFYING ' AGENCY REVIEW OF FINAL EIR Statement or Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actior^s,Attar scats: STATEMIM OF ISSUE: Attached is Agency Resolution No. 43 which makes certain findings conce. the mitigation of any adverse environmental impacts, certifies that all stu), -quired by law for the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and processing of the i.,, have been taken, and approves the Redevelopment Plan and determines that the use of tax increment funds outside the boundaries of the Project Area For the purpo >f providing affordable h0U5inn will be of benefit to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 43. ANALYSIS: This action represents the final Agency steps in the long and complex process which must be undertaken to establish a redevelopment project area. In addition to meet- ing all the legal requirements and proceedings, starf has persona; Iy contacted each affected taxing agency and made an effort to discuss the proposed plan with all the property owners. An attempt has also been made to inform the general public of these endeavors. As a result of these efforts, we feel the project which you are considering is feasible and that the redevelopment requirements have bi:en met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process. 'ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Redevelopment Plan and EIR (see Council Resolution No. 5154 and Ordinance No. 2577) CWT:TT:jb II I NoVeI REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION Date ._,,,_ 4ust 31i 1282 Subritted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency G[ Submitted b : Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato ' Y Y P Prepared by:,-9>om Tincher, Directbr of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: TRANSMITTAL OF REPORTS ON TALBERT-BEACH, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PLANS TO CITY COUNCIL q aqqA L . 1 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attact.•ients: f.' STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Prior to the public hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plans, you will be asked, acting as the Redevelopment Agency, to consider adopting the attached resolutions which approve. and transmit the "Report to the City Council" for each of the above named protects. These reports have been prepared pursuant to Section 33352 of the ► State of California Health and Safety Cede: RECOWENDATION: Adopt attached resolutions. -t ANALYSIS: " Section 33352 of the Health and Safety Code requires that every redevelopment plan w submitted by the Redevelopment Agency to the legislative body (City Council) shall be accompanied by a report containing specific detailed inform tion as set forth in said Section 33352. The attached documents have been prepared pursuant to this requirement. 'i ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not adopt the resolution and thus terminate the plan development process, r r ATTACHMENTS: . j 1. Resolutions r� 2. Reports to the City Council . CWT:TT:jb i ~.-_:.. ran, o.-..._._.. .._. . ._.._ .. . • •- ...._._. ._ .__ „�, It ' REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Date August 26, 1962 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council e.011. Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by: Oom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: ADOPTION OF TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAN )'-S A"D��' f? �L 1?e'5 5'1 evom, "' �7 5tstanwt of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant •+'o California Community Redevelopment Law, the Huntington Beach City Council and Redevelopment Agency may hold a joint public hearing to consider pub- lic input prior to taking action on the Redevelopment Plan. After the staff re- port is presented and the public hearing is held, the City Council and Redevelop- ment Agency will have several actions which must be taken. Acting as the City Council you will be asked to consider adopting the attached resolution which approves and certifies the EIR and introduce the ordinance which adopts the Redevelopment Plan. Both of these matters will be considered after you have taken several actions in your capacity as the Redevelopment Agency. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and certify EIR and introduce ordinance. ANALYSIS: These actions represent the final steps in the long and complex process which must be undertaken to establish a redevelopment project area. If the ordinance is introduced on September 7, 1982, it is anticipated that the second reading would take place on September 21, with the plan becoming effective 30 days thereafter. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Close the public hearing and introduce ordinance. 2. Continue the public hearing for additional input. 3. Not adopt ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Environmentai Impact Report 3. Ordinance 4. Redevelopment Plan CWT:TT:Jb ,. c Pcp 4/at �Y/ REQUES`-'�,FOR CITY COUNCIIPIXCTION Date July 26, 198�2 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �j��{?• Submittedbr Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator I ves Prepared by: 02Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ADOPTION OF MAIN-PIER, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING EIR's st#tement of law, Rooiwendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, mtechmmu STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which wE have completed, including the recent appointment of the Project Area Committee for -the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, we are now in a position to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearings at which time the above named Redevelopment Plans and EIR's will be considered for adoption and certification. RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution setting a joint public hearing with the Redevelopment Agency for 7:30 p.m. , Tuesday, September 7, 1982. ANALYSIS: Redevelopment Law requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weeks prior to the time at which the hearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August 2 meeting if we are to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: .•rL ZY GVUr Redevelopment funds to cover cost of publications. 8Y et ' ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting date until some time in the future. i EWT:TT:jb MO 41e1 54 REOUES: M REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY htjYON • �r$OyED ny CO UNCII. Dat _ C July 26, I Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment AgepCis► , Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrators �•,' i:r,_��c:i.►.:rtf`, Prepared by: 096 Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise St.biect: SETTING OF PUaLIC HEARING DATE FOR ADOPTION OF MAIN-PIER, YORKTOWN•LAKE AND TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLANS AND CERTIFICATION OF CORRESPONDING EIR'S Statement of Ion, Recommendetion,Analysis, Funding Souroe,Alternative Actions,Attachment.: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: With all the preliminary activities which we hove completed, including the recent appointment of the Project Area Committee for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project, we are now in a position•to proceed with the final steps which will culminate with the required public hearings at which time the above named Redovelopment Plans and EIR's will be considered for adoption and .certification. RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution setting a joint public hearing with the City Council for 7:30 p.m. , Tuesday, September 7, 1982. ANALYSIS: Redevelopment Law requires that a public hearing be held when consideration is being given to establishing a proposed Redevelopment Project. Notice must be provided through a local newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive' weeks prior to the time at which the hearing will be held. Therefore, it is necessary to set the hearing date at the August 2 meeting if we are to accomplish the required public notification. FUNDING SOURCE: Redevelopnnt funds to cover cost of publications. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Defer setting date until some time in the future: CWT:TT:3b *!n 4m jt1+LAC'.. .. ., ....... .. .. ... •.... .. .. .... _.. •, •, I y. .. ., M.. ... .. •-_... .V.-__.--�....».ne: -+.:::,.::y1'.Ie Gts REAUESf'�R REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AC. ,)N prte M!y 14, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency FNT D BY r TV CO�t tCtL Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City. Administrator Prepamd by, ,9�fom Ti ncher, Director of Business and Industrialse Subject: RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF REDEVELOP AND, PRELIMINARY DRAFT EIR's FOR THE TALBERT�-BEACH, OAKVIEW, YORKTOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS Statement of Imm, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Souros,AIt "ativo Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached for your review and transinitt l are copies of the proposed Redevelopment plans for. the four prbject areas stated above,. and their respective Preliminary Draft EIR's. The .action being taken is once again a preliminary step in the over- all Redevelopment Plan process which is required to insure adequate public input and City and Planning Commission involvement. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize transmittal of Redevelopment plans and Preliminary Draft EIR`s for public comment and review and to fulfill the procedural requirements of California Com- munity Redevelopment Law and C.E.Q.A. ANALYSIS: The transmittal of these documents to the•Plarfning .Commission, the Chief Administra- tive Officer of the County and other 'publi�c agencies initiates the formal review and reporting procedures for generating required input and responses which will be considered at the public hearing when the final Redevelopment Plan will be acted upon. Of greatest concern at the present is whether or not we can follow the required procedures and have the plans effective by August 199 1982. This date is important in that it is at that time that the base tax role is annually established. If we can have an Y adopted plan b that date, the tax increment P P financing of project costs will be expedited by one year; otherwise, we will have to utilize next year's base role and, thus, lose a year of appreciation in property values and increased taxes. By transmitting these documents at this time we will be in a position to proceed as rapidly as possible in firming up development proposals and disposition and development agreements for each of the project areas involved. As you are aware, this is of considerable interest and concern in regards to the Talbert-Beach senior citizens project and certainly would assist in our efforts to move forward in the Oakview Neighborhood Enhancement Area. Likewise, the schedule which we have esta- blished will allow us to be in a position to respond immediately to development proposals that will evolve after the Coastal Zone Land Use Plan and Specific Plans are adopted. ti 1. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: . Not to proceed at this time. However, such a delay would, in all likelihood, preclude our ability to have a project adopted and in effect prior to the August 19 deadline. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolut on°No. 28 transmitting Talbert-Beach proposed Redevelopment Plan P!nd'Praliminary Draft EIR. 2. kesolit'ion No. 29 ,.transmitting Oakview proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. 3. Resolution No. 30 transmitting Yorktown-Lake proposed Redevelopment Plan and ;Preliminary Draft EIR. 4. Resolution No. 31 transmitting Main-Pier proposed Redevelopment Plan and Preliminary Draft EIR. CWT:TT:jb I i i i I,7M' - .. A ' 1 Yam+\ REQUEST Pt'iOEDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTi-W;l� 1 p April 28, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chii rperson.and Redevelopment A ey Le Un►Htrd by., Charles W. Thompson, City Administra„toel 0' Frepoid by: '2 9 Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: RECEIVING AND TRANSMITTING PRELIMINARY REDEVELOPMENT PLANS !_b8tatirrr t of h m,F1wwmwKWW,Awlysk, Funding Sourm,Alt�Actbm,Attschmenft STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to Secticn.33233 of the Cal ifornia 'Community Redevelopment Law, attached are preliminary plans which have been approved.by the Planning Commission oii April 20, 1982 as reflected by the appropriate resolutions which are included. The next step of the redevelci+ment process for each of the proposed project areas is for the Redevelopment Agency to acknowledge receipt of the preliminary plans, adopt said preliminary plans and direct the Secretary to transmit said plans to the appropri- ate government agencies. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached resolutions for each preliminary plan. ANALYSIS: This step is still a preliminary step in the overall .legal process which must be, pursued in the implementation of a redevelopment program. Upon adoption and trans- mittal of these documents, staff will prepare a proposed redevelopment plan which reflects a refinement of this information, as well as the appropriate EIR. These documents will be forwarded to the Redevelopment Agency next month. The information contained in the EIR and the proposed plan will then be discussed with affected Property owners, taxing agencies .and interested persons during the next several months, with the formal consideration of these documents not coming until some time in August of this year. At that time a formal public hearing will be required on all the information generated to date and throughout the next several months. FUNDING SOURCE! None required. ATTACHMENTS: ; I. Resolution #23 receiving the preliminary plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. 2. Resolution 024 receiving the preliminary plan for the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area. 3. Resolution #25 receiving the preliminary plan for the Yorktown-Lake Redevelop- ment Project Area. 4. Resolution 026 receiving the preliminary plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area, CWT:TT:jb i 174i ,,-.� J H HW:C FA:d f d(o-.., :I/06/84 01/09/84 01/30/84 02/-71/84 AFot, KECGR[ITION RETURN TO: Jones Hall hill b White, MARKED TO S-HOW C'riANGZB1 A Professional Law Corporation cur Embarcajero Center, Suite 1950 San Francisco, California 94111 Attention: Cnarles F. Adams i LEASE AGREEMENT V Dated as of April 1 ; 1984 by and bet%een the I RF.DFVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, as Lessor and the CITY OF HUNIINGION BEACH, as Lessee Atgnt 1 ti t LEASE AGREEMENI THIS LEASE, dated for convenience as of April 1 , 1984, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, 3 public body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, as lessor (the "Agency"), and the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation 1 duly organized and existing under the laws of said State, as lessee (the "City"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Agency presently owns certain land in the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area within the City of Huntington Beach, on which the Agency wishes to construct certain multifamily rental housing facilities; and WHEREAS, in order to provide funds to acquire and construct such multifamily rental housing facilities the Agency has proposed to lease such multifamily rental housing facilities to the City, and the City is authorized pursuant to the constitution and laws of the State to enter into leasehold agreements for such purposes; and WHEREAS, the Agency will, cause to be provided funds for the acquisition and construction of such multifamily rertal housing facilities to be leased pursuant to this Lease; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and of the muttial { covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: . i t�«4 It •b, �l« - 1. t ' ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS SECTION 1.1. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section snail , for all purposes of this Lease Agreement have the meanings herein specified. L "Agenc " mea•- the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, a public body corporate and politic duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State. "A_g-ency_ Representative" means the Chief Executive Officer, the Senior Commjiniiy Development Specialist or the Chief of Administrative Services of the %V Agency, or any other person authorized to act an beha'f of the Agency under or with respect to this Lease as evidenced by a resolution conferring such authorization adopted by the Agency. 1� "Assignment Agreement" means the Assignment Agreement, dated as of April 1 , 1 1984, by and between the Agency and the Trustee, to ether with any duly authorized 1#and executed amendment thereto. "Bank" means Golden State Sanwa Bank, a California banking. corporation,-iUl successors and assi ns. n1, Representative" moans_ the_person or_persons at_the time de3i9na ed.,bjt the BanA Py written certifica_ie -furnished to the Trustee containing the specimen st9natures of such person or persons- and signed on behalf of the Bank by a Vice President thereof. Such certificate may`desfgnai en aitern_afe or:al-terna`i+es:" �`- "Certificate of Completion" means, with respect to the Project, a certificate of an architect, approved by the Agency Representative, stating that the acquisition, construction and improvement of the Project have been completed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor. "Certificates_ of Participation" or "Certificates" means the $ i ' aggregate principal amount of Certificates of Participation ( Gerry Park Senior Citizens Housing Project) to be executed and delivere%: pursuant to the Trust Agreement. "Ci1Z" means the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation and chartered-city duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State. "City Representative" means the City Administrator, the Senior Community Development Specialist or the Chief of Administrative Services of the City or a person authorized by the City Council of the City to act on his behalf under or with respect to this Lease as evidenced by a resolution conferring such authorization adopted by the City Council . z I' i "Closino Date" means the day when the Certificates of Participation, duly executed by the Trustee, are aelivered to the Original Purchaser. "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. Each citation to a provision of the Code shall include the regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury promulgated from time to time under such provision. ' "Completion Date" means the date on which the Agency files the Certificate i of Completion with the Trustee and the City. "Construction Costs" means all costs of acquiring the Site and im ; constructing, proving and equipping the Project thereon, including but not i limited to: ' (i) all costs which the Agency shall be required to pay to any person under the terms of any agreement for or relating to the acquisition of the Site (including but not limited to relocation costs) or any portion thereof, and the construction, improvement or equipping of the Project thereon; (ii) obligations of the Agency incurred for labor and Materials (including obligations payable to the Agency for actual out-of-pocket expenses of the Agency) in connection with the construction, improving or equipping of the Project, including reimbursement to the Agency for all advances and payments made in connection with the Project prior to c•- after delivery of the Certificates; (iii) the cost of performance or other bonds and any and all types of insurance that may be necessary or appropriate to have in effect during the course of construction of the Project; .t, (iv) all costs of engineering and architectural services, including the actual out-of-pocket ,.u3ts of the Agency for test borings, surveys, estimates, plans and specifications and preliminary investigations therefor, development fees, sales commissions, and for supervising construction, as well as for the performance of all other duties required by or consequent to the proper acquisition, construction or improvement of the Project; and (v) any sums required to reimburse the Agency for advances made by the f Agency for any of the above items or for any other costs incurred and for work done by the Agency which are properly chargeable to the acquisition of the Site or the construction, improvement or equipping of the Project thereon. ! "Construction Fund" means the fund by that name established and held by the Trustee pursuant to Article III of the Trust Agreement. "Deed of Trust" means the Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement dated as of April 1, 1984, executed and delivered by Lhe Agency'• "Delivery Costs" means all items of expanse directly or indirectly payable by or reimbursable to'the City or the Agency relating to the execution, sale and delivery of this Lease Agreement or the Certificates, including but not limited to 1 filing and recording costs, settlement costs, printing costs, reproduction and 3 r i binding costs, initial fees :nd charges of the Trustee, financing discounts, legal ; fees and charges, initial_L>.:-:er of Credit fees, insurance fees and charges, Agency and City travel expenses, Certificate insurance premiums, financial and other j professioial consultant fees, costs of rating agencies or credit ratings, fees for exe=utior., transportation and safekeeping of the Certificates and charges and fees in connection with the foregoing. "Federal Securities" means any of the following which are noncallable and which at the time of investment are legal investments under the laws of the State for trust funds held by the Trustee: i � (a) direct general obligations of (including obligations issued or held in book entry form on the books of the Department of the Treasury of the United States of America), or obligations the payment of principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America; or (b) bonds, debentures or notes or other evidence of indebtedness payable in cash issued by one or a combination of any of th,> following: federal agencies whose obligations represent the full faith and credit of the United States '. of America; Export Import Bank of the United States, Federal Financing Bank, Farmer's Home Administration, Public Housing Authority, and Government National Mortgage Association, "Fiscal Year" means the twelve-month PQriod beginning on July 1 in any year and ending­o'n June 3D in the following year. .J "Independent Counsel" means an attorney duly admitted to the practice of law :.;j before the highes�court o'f the state in which such attorney maintains an office and who is not an employee of the Agency, the Trustee or the City. "Insurance and Condemnation Fund" means the fund by that name established and held by tha Trustee pursuant to Article VII of the Trust Agreement. "Lease Agreement" or "Lease" means this Lease Agreement together with any duly authoriied and executed amendment hereto. "Lease Payment" means any payment required to be made by the City pursuant ' to Sect fan 4'.4' f this Lease, as set forth in Exhibit A to this Lease. "Lease Payment Fund" means the fund by that name established and held by the ` Trustee pursuant to Article V of the Trust Agreement. "Letter of Credit" means the irrevocable standby letter of credit issued by the 8ank for the account of the City� _ta.be held by the Trustee for the benefit of the Certificate. Qwners,.J substantially__the^ form attached as Exhibit A to the Reimbursement Agreement, - _ _ �.. _....__.. . _ "Lower-Income Tenants" means individuals of low or moderate income within the mean fng of Section 1U3(6)(12)(C) of the Code and the Regulations thereunder. For this purpose the occupants of a unit shall not be considered to be of low or moderate income if all of such occupy is are students (as defined in Section 4 151(e)(4) of the Code) , no one of whom is entitled to file a joint return under Section 6013 of the Code. "Net Proceeds" means any insurance proceeds or condemnation award in excess of 550,000, paid with respect to the Project or the Site, or any proceeds resulting from the sale of the Project and the Site pursuant to Section 9.2(b) hereof, to the extent remaining after payment therefrom of all expenses incurred in the collection thereof. 1 "Original Purchaser" means Stone & Youngberg, as original purchaser of the Certificates. "Owner" or "Certificate Owner" or "Owner of.-a Certificate", or any similar term, when used with respect to a Certificate mans the Person in whose name such - fully registered Certificate shall be registered. i "Permitted Encumbrances" means, as of any particular time: (i) liens for general ad valorem taxes and assessments, if any, not then delinquent, or which the City may, pursuant to provisions of Article V hereof, permit to remain unpaid; (ii) the Assignment Agreement; (M) this Lease Agreement; (iv) any right or claim of any mechanic, laborer, materialman, supplier or vendor no; filed or perfected in the .manner prescribed by law; (v) easements, rights of Hay, mineral rights, drilling rights and other rights, reservations, covenants, conditions or restrictions which exist of record as of the Closing Date and which the City certifies in writing will not materially impair the use of the Site for the Project; (yi) the Deed of Trust;_ and vii) easements, rights of way, mineral rights, drilling rTghts�'4rid ot�isr rfig ts, reservations, covenants, conditions or restrictions established following the date of recordation of this Lease and to which the Agency and the City consent in writing. "prepayment_Date" means any date on Hh:ci� the City may exercise its option to prepay all or a portion of the remaining Lease Payments, as set forth in the attached Exhibit S. "Prepayment Price" means the price to be paid by the City to exercise its option to propay all or a. portion of the remaining Lease Payments, on any Prepayment Date, as set forth in the attached Exhibit B. "Project" means the multifamily rental housing improvements and all property, improvements, equipment and facilities, including but not limited to ! landscaping, utilities and other public improvements, to be constructed on the Site 1 from moneys deposited in the Corr ruction Fund. is r "Reimbursement Agreement" means the Letter pf Credit and Reimbur�_y_W nt Agreement dated as of A-pri l 1.�1984,by_ and between the City dnd the 6ank, together with any duly authorised and.executed amendment thereto. "Reserve _Fund" means the fund by that name established and held by the Trustee pursuant to Section 6.01 of the Trust Agreement. 5 i "Reserve Requirement" means, as of the date of calculation, an amount equal tohundred fifty-five days' interest with respect to the outstanding Certificates. "Revenues" means the dross amount of (i) all rents) recei ts_,, a menns a other income and revenue derived he City with respect to, or otherwise derived from, the operation of the Project, (ii) all amounts derived with respect Lo the Deed of Trust, (iii) all amounts derived with respect to the Letter of Credit, (iv) } all Net Proceeds of insurance or condemnation award with respect to the Project, (v) all amounts deriveo from the investment of funds held by the Trustee under the Trust Agreement, and (vi) any other amounts required hereunder or under the Trust Agreement,to be applied to the payment of the Lease Payments. "Site" means all of that certain real property located in the City described in Exhibit C, on which the Project is to be situated. "State" means the State of California. "Term of this Lease" or "Term" means the time during which this Lease is in effect, as provided for in Section 4.2 hereof. "Trust Agreement" means the agreement entitled "Trust Agreement" and dated as of April^1, 1984, by and among the Trustee, the Agency and the City, together { with any duly authorized and executed amendment thereto. "Trustee" means Security-Pacific National, Bank, or any successor thereto acting as Trustee pursuant to the Trust Agreement. SECTION 1.2. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attached to, and by reference made a part of, this Lease: Exhibit A: The schedule of Lease Payments to be paid by the City hereunder with respect to the Site and the Project, showing the date and amount of each Lease Payment. Exhibit 8: The schedule of Prepayment Dates and corresponding Prepayment Prices. Exhibit C: The description of the real property constituting the Site. 1 jI i i I 6 I 1 .. i t � ARTICLE I1 REPRESENTATIONS, COVE►. ':TS AND WARRANTIES SECTION 2.1 . R presentations, Covenants and Warranties of the_C y. The City represents, covenants and warrants to the Agency as foflows: V (d) Due Organization and Existence. The City is a municipal corporation and chartered city ouly .organized and existing under the laws and Constitution of the State. (b) Lv� -horIzation. The Constitution and the laws of the State authorize the City to enter •into this Lease,Athe Trust Agreement. .LhP.3Qi".b=em ant Agreement and to enter into the transactions contemplated by and to carry out its obligations under all of the aforesaid Agreements, and the City has duly authorized and executed all of the aforesaid Agreements. (c) No Violations. Neither the execution and delivery of this Lease, the Trust Agreement,- the_Reimbursement,_-Agreerront� nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions hereof or thereof, nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, conflicts with or results in a breach of the terms, conditions or provisions of any restriction or any agreement or instrument to which the City is now a party or by which the City is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing, or results in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge or encumbrances whatsoever upon any of the property or assets of the City, or upon the Site or the Project, except Permitted Encumbrances. (d) Exec thution and Delivery. Th: City hay duly authorized and executed this Lease in accordance-wi -the iaws�of the State. SECTION 2.2. Re resentations Cov_enan_ts and Warranties of A enc The ! Agency represents, covenant: and warrants io the City as follows: -.._.9- �� (a) Due Organization and Existence. The Agency is a public body ' corporate and politic duiy -organizHd and existing under and by virtue of the i Community Redevelopment Law of the State (constituting Part I of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State); has pcwer to enter into this Lease, the Assignment Agreement dnd the Trust Agreement; is possessed of full power to own and hold real and personal property, dnd to lease and sell tl.e game; and has duly authorized the execution and delivery of all of the aforesaid Agreements. (b) ! oq jncumbrances. The Agency will not pledge the Lease Payments or t' other amounts derived from tip Project or the Site and from its other rights under this Lease, and will not mort;; or encumber the Project or the Site, except as provided under th•: terms of this ease and the Trust Agreement. �i (c) No Violations. Neither the execution and delivery of this lease, the Assignment dgreeinent" or` the Trust Agreement, nor the fulfillment of or j compliance with the terms and conditions hereof or thereof. nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, conflicts with or results in a 7 L,r;ach of the terms, conditions or provisions of any restriction or any agreement or instrument to which the Agency is now a party or by which the Agency is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing, or results in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge or encumbrance whatsoever upon any of the property or assets of the Agency, or upon the Project or the Site, except Permitted Encup.branc-us. (d) No Assignments. Except as provided herein, the Agency will not assign this Lease, its right to receive Lease Payments from the City, or its duties and obligations hereunder to any other person, firm or corporation so as to impzir or violate the representations, covenants ano warranties contained in this Section 2.2. I; s ARTICLE III i DEPOSIT OF MONEYS; ACQUISITION OF THE SITE AN0 THE PROJECT ' i SECTION 3.1. Deposit of Moneys. On the Closing Date, the Agency shall cause o be deposited with the Trustee the proceeds of sale of >ne Certificates. Pu► !vant to the Trust Agreement, the Reserve Requirement shall be deposited by the Trustee in the Reserve Fund; the Lease Payment of advance rental payable by the City hereunder shall be deposited by the Trustee in the lease payment Fund; and the remaining balance of said amount shall be deposited by the Trustee in the Construction Fund. SECTION 3.2. AcSuta j. ior, and_Con:truction of the Site and the Project. j•; The Agency hereby agrees to supervfs' and provide for, or cause to be supervised 1.. and provided for, the complete acquisition of the Site and the construction, improvement and equipping of the Project thereon, and will cause the same to be 1 diligently performed after the deposit of funds with the Trustee pursuant to Section 3,1. The Agency will use its best efforts to ensure that the acquisition of the Site and the construction, improvement and equipping of the Project thereon will be substantially completed in accordance with plans ?nd specificaticns approved by the Agency on or prior to tiJoly 31 ,1985. The City zgrees that upon ,. substantial completion of any portion of the Project it will take possession of that portion of such portion of the Project .under t e terms and provisions of this w` ; Lease. n{ ; � , _ - f :,� , =;t � , Upon completion of the Project and Site satisfactory to the City and the Agency, but in any event not later than thirty (30) days following completion of , such cons ruction, the City shall deliver to the Trustee the Certificate of t Completion. j �1„lj;'.titi {;• If the Agency, for any reason whatsoever, cannot deliver the possession of the Project and the Site to the City by ,ply 31,­1985, this Lease shall not be void r' or voidable, nor shall the Agency be liable to the City for any loss or damage resulting therefrom, nor stkl]_there_be . any_ reduc.tion_.in._or...po.stR4rjemsnt—o —the payment by the City of the Lease Payments._pursuant to Section 4.4 hereof, tj i SECTION 3.3. hayment_of Construetion_Costs. Payment of the Construction Costs shall be made from the moneys deposited with the Trustee in the Construction s Fund as provided in Section 3.1 hereof, which shall be disburs•:d for this purpose in accordance and upon compliance with Article III of the Trust Agreement. �r SECTION 3.4. Unexpenrged Proceeds. All excess moneys remaining in the Construction Fund and not required for payment of Delivery Costs and Construction Costs shall be transferred by the Trustee to the Lease Payment Fund and applied to pay the lease Payments as the-same become due and payable, all pursuant to and in accordan�Ic�e witty %ea�to 3.031ot, the Trust Agreement. 9 . j ARTICLE IV AGREEMENT TO LEASE; TERMINATION OF THIS LEASE; LEASE PAYMENTS; TITLE TO THE PROJECT SECTION 4.i. Lease. The Agency hereby leases the Project and the Siite to the City, and the City hereby leases the Project and the Site froq�the ArerCY UPPIRi the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease. �,•I�, I ,. re 1) I , ( all'('( SECTION 4.2. Term of-Agreement. The Term, of this Lease shall commence on the date hereof, and�shallV-end on June 30, F61W, unless such term is extended as hereinafter provided. If on ,Lune 30, 2014, the Trust Agreement shall not be discharged by its terms, or if .he Lease Payments payable hereunder shall have baen abated at any time and for any reason, then the Term of this Lease shall be extended until the Trust Agreement shall be discharged by its terms. If prior to June 30, 2014, the Trust Agreement shall be discharged by its terms, the Term of this Lease shall thereupon end. In the event the City prepays all of the Lease Payments in accnrdance with Section 10.2, the Term of this Lease shall at the election of the City expire. / ! SECTION 4.3. Possession. It is contemplated that the City will . take possession of the Project and the Site on or before"Uyiy 1 ; 1985, and the first Lease Payment (other than the Lease Payment of advance -rental payable. as provided in Exhibit A) shall be the Lease Payment due 1nd..p4yable on Jti„ul 15, 1985. If the construction, improvement and equipping of the Project or portion thereof shall be substantially completed before(p_ulyl; )985, the City shall take possession of the Project or such portion thereof and the Site upon the substantial completion thereof. As provided in. Section_3.2 if the Project shall not be substantially► tom}lletgd by„the Agency_ori or _be fore 30...1985i_there shall be no abatement o1r the Lease Payments whatsoever. a -�- SECTION 4.4. Lease Payments, i (a) Obligation to_P . Nl'ne City agrees to pay to the Agency, its successors and assigns, as rental for the use and occupancy of the Project and the Site, but only from the Revenues as hereinafter provided, the Lease Payments (den omfinated into componerits-6F prinUp l and-1AT.erest)-for the Project and the Site in the amounts specified in Exhibit A, to be due and payable on the fifteenth day of the month immediately preceding each of the payment dates specified in Exhibit A. Any amount held in the Lease Payment Fund on any Lease Payment date —pother than amounts resulting from the prepayment of the Lease Payments in part but 1, not in whole pursuant to Article X and other amounts required for payment of past U (due principal or interest with respect to any Certificates not presented for � paymen't) shall be credited towards the Lease Payments then due and payable; and no rrI , Lease Payment need be made on any Lease Payment date if the amounts then held in the Lease Payment Fund are at least equal to the Lease Payment then required to be paid. All Lease Payments payable in any Fiscal Year (other than the first Lease Payment d of advance rental) shall be for the use of the Project and the Site for such Fiscal Year. 10 t r (b) Effect of Prepayment. In the event that the City prepays all remaining Lease Payments irfu11 pursuant to Article X, the City' s obligations under this Lease shall thereupon cease and terminate, including but not limited to the City's obligation to pay Lease Payments under this Section. In the event the ' City prepays less than all of the remaining principal components of the Lease Payments pursuant to Section 10.3, the principal components of the remaining Lease Payments shall be reduced such that approAimately equal lease Payments prevail , corresponding on an annual basis to the prevailing annual payments of principal i with respect to the outstanding Certificates; and the interest component of each subsequent remaining Lease Payment shall be reduced by the aggregate corresponding amount of interest which would otherwise be payable with respect to the Certificates redeemed as a result of such prepayment. _ N (c) Rate on Overdue_Payments. In the event the City should fail to make any of the payments required in this Section 4.4, the payment in default shall continue as an obligation of the City until the amount in default shall have been fully paid, and the City agrees to pay the same with interest thereon (but only from the Revenues), to the extent permitted by law, from the date thereof at the rate of twelvepercent 12%) per annum. i (d) Fair Rental Value. The Lease Payments for the Project and the Site I for each Fiscal Year during the Ter- of this' Lease shall constitute the total rental for the Project and the Site for such Fiscal Year, and shall be paid by the City in each Fiscal Year for and in consideration of the right of the use and occupancy of, and the continued quiet use and enjoyment of the Project and the Site during each Fiscal Year for :ihich said Lease payments are to be paid. The parties hereto have agreed and detPr.nined tf•-it the trital Lease Payments for the Project and the Site do no . exceed the fair rental value of such Project and such Site. In making such determination, consideration has been given to the appraised value of the Project and the Site, other obligations or the parties under this Lease, the � uses and purposes which may be served by the Project and the benefits therefrom which will accrue to the City and the general public. (e) Assignment. The City understands and agrees that all lease t Payments have been assigned by the Agency to the Trustee in trust, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, for the benefit of the Owners of the Certificates, and the City hereby assents to such assignment. The Agency hereby directs the City, and the City hereby agrees, to pay to the Trustee at the Trustee' s principal corporate ' trust office in Los Angeles, California, or to the Trustee at such other place as the Trustee shall direct in writing, all payments payable by the City pursuant to this Section 4.4 and all amounts payable by the City pursuant to Article X. SECTION 4.5. Spacial Obligation; ,`imitation o.f .Lfability .tq_Revenues. The City' s obligations under this Lease >,greement shall be special obligations it solely to the Revenues. Under no circumstances shall the City he required to advance any moneys derived from any source of income other than the Revenues for i. the payment of any of the City' s obligations hereunder, nor shall any other funds or property of the City be liable in any manner whatsoever for the payment of the Lease Payments. i 11 Subject to the first paragraph of this Section 4.5, the City's obligation to pay Lease Payments from Revenues and observe the other agreements on its part contained in this Agreement shall be absolute and unconditional . Until such time as all Lease Payments have been fully paid, the City (i) will not suspend or discontinue paying the Lease Payments when due, (ii) will perform and observe all of its other agreements contained in this Agreement, and (iii) will not terminate this Agreement for any cause, including, without limiting the generality of the 1 foregoing, iailure to complete the Project, any acts or circumstances that may constitute failure of consideration, destruction of or damage to the Project, commercial frustration of purpose, any change in the laws of the United States of America or of the State of California or any failure of the Trustee or the Agency to perform and observe any agreement, whether express or implied, nr any duty, liability or obligation arising out of or connected with this Agreement. . SECTION 4.6. Pledge. and_Assignment of Revenues. All Revenues shall be applied to the obligations of the �Cfty hereunder. The City hereby transfers, assigns and sets over to the Agency all of the Revenues. The Trustee, as assignee of the Agency under the Assignment Agreement, shall be entitled to collect and receive all of the Revenues. All of the Revenues are assigned to the payment and prepayment of the Lease Payments, and shall be credited towards the payment and prepayment of the obligations of the City hereunder. SECTION 4.7. Quigt_Enjoyment. During the Term of this Lease, the Agency shall provide the City with quiet use and enjoyment of the Project and the Site, and the City shall during such Term peaceably and quietly have and hold and enjoy the Project and the Site, without suit, trouble er hindrance from the Agency, except as expressly set forth in this Lease. The Agency will , at the request of the City and at the City's cost, join in any legal action in which the City asserts its right to such possession and enjoyment to the extent the Agency may lawfully do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Agency shall have the right to inspect the Project and the Site as provided in Section 7.2. F; SECTION 4.8 Title. During the Term of this Lease, the Agency shall hold title to the Project and the Site and any and all additions which comprise i fixtures, repairs, replacements or modifications thereof, except for those fixtures, repair?, replacements or modifications which are added to the Project or the Site by the City and which may be removed without damaging the Project and except for any items added to the Project or the Site by the City pursuant to Section S.9 hereof. If the City prepays the Lease Payments in -full pursuant to Article X or makes the advance deposit required by Section .10.1, or pays all Lease Payments during the Term of this Lease as the same become due and payable, all right, title and interest of the Agency in and to the Project and the Site shall bE transferred to and vested in the City. Title shall be transferred to and vested in the City hereunder without the necessity for any further instrument of transfer. SECTION 4.9. Additional Payments. In addition to the Lease Payments, the City shall pay when due all costs and expenses incurred by the Agency to comply with the provisions of the Trust Agreement, including without limitation compensation due to the Trustee and all costs and expenses of auditors, engineers and 12 v1 accountants, but excluding Delivery Costs (which :hall be paid by the Agency from moneys deposited in the Construction Fund). SECTION 4.10. Subordinate to Deed of Trust. The City hereby acknowledges and agrees that this Lease Agreement is and shall be at all times during the Term of this Lease subject and subordinate to the Deed of Trust and the lien established thereby on the Project and the Site. I I 13 .�..�....w., w.............w......... . . .. - _ ..t" .. .... .. .. .. ..... . .... .. .... .._.......... «..w ...«... ._......_.._�......_..,,.,,,o n r�..r,�„r.an:.T,l7.y"_'�J.,t,.� •t ARTICLE V MAINTENANCE; TAXES; INSURANCE; AND OTHER MATTERS SECTION 5.1. Maintenance� Utilities,. Taxes and Assessments. Throughout the Perm of this Lease, as part of the consideration fot=_the rental of the Project and the Site, all improvement, repair and maintenance of the Project and the Site shall be the responsibility of the City, and the City shall pay for or otherwise arrange for the payment of all utility services supplied to the Project and the Site, which may include, without limitation, janitor service, security, power, gas, telephone,, light, heating, water and all ether utility services, and shall pay for or otherwise arrange for the payment of the cost of the repair and replacement of the Project and the Site resulting from ordinary wear and tear or want of care on Y r ' the part of the City or any assignee or sublessee thereof. In exchange for the ' Lease Payments herein provided, the Agency agrees to provide only the project and the Site, as hereinbefore more specifically set forth. The City waives the benefits of subsections 1 and 2 of Section 1932 of the California Civil Code, but such waiver shall not limit any of the rights of the City under the terms of this Lease. The City shall also pay or cause to be paid all taxes and assessments of any type or nature charged to the Agency or the City affecting the Project and the Site or t,ne respective interests or estates therein (including but not limited to any possessory interest tax); provided that with respect to special assessments or other governmental charges that may lawfully be paid in installments over a period of years, the City shall be obligated to pay only such installments as are required to be paid during the Term of this (_ease as and when the same become due, Nothing herein is intended or shall be construed in any w2y to impair the ability of they City to contest any such taxes, assessments or charges. ;��;► , SECTION 5.2. Modification of Projects. The City and any sublessee 'shall , at their own expense,�have�the `ri'jht to remodel ttv Project or to make auditions, modifications and improvements to any Project and the Site. All such additions, modifications and improvements shall thereafter comprise part of the Project and < the Site and be subject to the previsions of this Lease. Such additions, modifications and improvements shall not in any way damage the Project or cause it to be used for purposes other than those authorized under the provisions of state and federal law; and the Project and the Site, upon completion of any additions, modifications and improvements made thereto pursuant to this Section, shall be of a value which is not substantially less than the value of the Project and the Site immediately prior to the making of such additions, modifications and improvements. The City will not permit any mechanic's or other lien to be established or remain against the Project or the Site for labor or materials furnished in connection with any remodeling, additions, modifications, improvements, repairs, renewals or replacements made by the City or any sublessee or assignee pursuant to this Section; provided that if any such lien is established and the Agency shall be notified of the City' s or any sublessee's intention to do so, the City or any sublessee may in good faith contest any lien filed or established against the Project or the Site, and in such event may permit; the items so contested to remain undischarUed and unsatisfied during the period of such contest and any appeal therefrom and shall provide the' Agency with full, security again!,,; any loss or 1 14 I forfeiture which might arise from the nonpayment of any such item, in form satisfactory to the Agency. The Agency will ;.00perate fully in any such contest, upon the request and at tha expense of the City or such-sublessee. SECTION 5.3. Public LiabiIity_ and Pr2perty pamage Insurance. The City shall maintain or cause ta~bQ maintained, throughout the Term of this Lease, a standard comprehensive general insurance policy or policies in protection of the City, its members, officers, agents and employees and the Trustee. Said policy or policies shall provide for indemnification of said parties against direct or contingent loss or liability for damages' for bodily and personal injury, death or property damage occasioned by reason of the constr.rctior, or operation of the Project. Said policy or policies shall provide coverage in the minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 for personal injury or death of each person and S3,000,000 for personal injury or deaths of two or more persons in each accident or event, and in a minimum amount of S150,000 for damage to property resulting from each accident or event, in each case subject to a deductible clause of not to exceed S25,000. Such public liability and ;.roperty damage insurance may, however, be in the form of a single limit policy in the amount of S3,000,000 covering all such risks. Such liability insurance may be maintained as part of or in conjunction with aoy other liability insurance coverage carried by the City, and may be maintained in the form of self-insurance or self-insured retention by the City. The Net Proceeds of such liability insurance shall be applied toward extinguishment or satisfaction of the liability with respect to which the Net Proceeds of such insurance shall have been paid. SECTION 5.4. Fire and Extended Cov_era_ge. Insurance. The City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be proc`ur•e'd acid maintained, throughout the Term of this Agreement, insurance against loss or damage to any structures constituting any part of the Project by fire and lightning, with extended :overage and vandalism and malicious mischief insurance. Said extended coverage insurance shall , as nearly as practicable, cover loss or damage by explosion, windstorm, riot, aircraft, vehicle damage, smoke and such other hazards as are normally covered by such insurance. Such insurance shall be in an amount equal to 100% of the replacement cost of the Project (except that such insurance may be subject to deductible clauses of not to exceed $100,000 for any one loss). Such insurance may be maintained a:. part of or in conjunction with any other fire and extended coverage insurance carried or required to be carried by the City and may be maintained in the form of self- insurance by the City. The tvet Proceeds of such insurance shall be applied as provided in Section 6.2(a). SECTION 5.5. Rental Interruption or Use and Occupancy Insurance. The City t. shall procure, and maintain through the Term oFthis Agreement rental interruption or use and occupancy insurance to cover loss, total or partial , of tl.e use of any f, structures constituting any part of the Project as a result of any of the hazards covered in the insurance required by Section 5.4 hereof, in an amount sufficient to pay the aggregate Lease Payments required to be paid in any future twelve-month period in which such aggregate Lease Payments are the greatest. The Net Proceeds ; of such insurance shall be paid to the Trustee and deposited in the Lease Payment i Fund, and shall be credited towards the payment of the Lease Payments in the order i in which such Lease Payments come due and payable, l t 15 . ' , .. •�.j.jam.f r ' SV ION 5.6. Title Insurance. The City shall provide, at its own expense, on or before the Closing~pate, a+title insurance paiicy in fort~ satisfactory to the i . Trustee and in the amount of not less than _ _ _ _ _ Dollars (s __ ) , insuring the City' s leasehold estate~in the Site, subject only + to Permitted Encumbrances. All Net Proceeds received under said policy shall be 1 deposited vith the Trustee in the Lease Payment Fund and shall be credited towards 1 the prepayment of the rs.-nzining Lease Payments pursuant to section 10.3. SECTION 5.7. Insurance Net Proceeds. Form of Policies . Each policy of insurance required by Sections 5.4,`5.5 and 5.6 hi­eof'shall provide that all proceeds thereunder shall be payable to the Trustee for the benefit of the Certificate Owners. All policies of insurance required by this Lease and any sLatemerts of self-insurance shall be in form satisfactory to the Trustee. The , City shall pay or cause to be paid when due the premiums for all insurance policies 4 .. required by this Lease, and shall promptly furnish or cause to . be furnished evidence of such payments to the Trustee. All such policies shall provide that the Trustee shall be given thirty (30) days' lotice of each expiration, any intended cancellation thereof or reduction of the coverage provided thereby. The Trustee shall not be responsible for the sufficiency of any insurance herein required and shall be fully protected in accepting payment on account of such insurance or any adjustment, compromise or settlement of any loss agreed to by the Trustee. The City shall cause t: be delivered to the Trustee annually evidence satisfactory to the Trustee that the insurance policies required by this Lease are in full force and effect. SECTION 5.8. Advances. If the City shall fail to perform any of its obligations under this Arti e the Agency may, but shall not be obligated to, take such action as may necessary to cure such failure, including the advancement of money, and the City shall be obligated to repay all such advances as soon as �r possible, with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the advance to c the date of repayment. ; SECTION 5.9. _Installation of C_ ity' s Fquip.!E nt. The City and any sublessee may at any time and Jrom�time to time, in its sole discretion and at its own 4%'! expense, install or permit to be installed other items of equipment or other , personal property in or upon-the Project and the Site. All such items shall remain , ' the sole property of such party, in which neither the Agency nor the Trustee shall have any interest, and may be modified r removed by such party at any time provided �. that such party shall repair and tore any and all damage to the Project resulting from the installation, mt,.) fication or removal of any such items. .; Nothing in this Lease shall prevent the City and any sublessee from purchasing items to be installed pursuant to this Section under a conditional sale or lease purchase contract, or subject to a vendor' s lien or security agreement, as security for the unpaid portion of the purchase price thereof, provided that no such lien or security interest shall attach to any part of the Project or the Site. SECTION 5.10. Liens. The City shall not, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or claim on or with respect to the Project or the Site, other than the respective rights of the Agency and the City as herein provided and Permitted Encumbrances. Except as expressly provided in this Article, the City shall promptly, at its own 16 i I I j II I expense, take such action as may be necessary to duly discharge or remove any such mortgage, pledge, lien, charge, encumbrance or claim, for which it is responsible, if the same shad arise at any time. The City shall reimburse the Agency for any --- expense incurred by it in order to discharge or remove any such mortgage, pledge, -- Iien, charge, encumbrance or claim. • SECTION 5.11. No Discrimination. The City shall refrain from restricting the rental , sale cr le4se _6f• the Project or the Site on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry of any person. All deeds, leases or contracts hereinafter executed by the City with respect to the { Project and the Site or any portion th:reof shall contain and be subject to the following nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses: (a) In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for- itself, its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, development, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." (b) In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for itself, its heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein leased nor shall the lessee Itself, or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants or vendees in the land herein leased." (c) In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transfAree itself or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregat.fon with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenant:, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the land." SECTION 5.12. Project to be Rented to Lower-Income Tenants. The City hereby agrees that from and after the Term of this tease, at least fifty per (500) of the completed dwelling units in i the Project shall either (i) be occupied by lower-Income Tenants or (I) if vacant, { I 17 I shall have been last occupied by Lower-Income Tenants. In addition, the City shall use its best efforts to ensure that from and after the Completion Date and thereafter throughout the Term of this, Lease, all of ;he c:,mpleted dwelling units in the Project shall be occupied by Lower-Ircome Tenants. The requirements of this ! Section 5.12 shall be effective only during the Term of this Lease and shall not ranain effective for any period during which the Project shall be subleased by the City pursuant to Section 8.2 hereof, i i �i I 18 I � . I ARTICLE VI 1 DANtiGE, DESTRUCTIONANC EN,i�'ENT DOMAIN; USE OF NET PROCEEDS \� SECTIOtJ 6.1. Eminent _Domain. If all of the Project and the Site shall be taken permanently under the power of eminent dorrain, the term of this Lease shall cease as of the day possession shall be !o taken. if less than all of the Project and the Site shall be taken permanently, or if all of the Project or the Site or any (.� part thereof shall be taken temporarily, under the power of eminent domain, (1) this Lease shall continue in full force and effect and shall not be terminated by virtue of such taking and the parties waive the benefit of any law to the contrary, and Z there shall be no abatement, reduction or postponement of Lease Payments except s m result from the application'of t1,e oceeds of any eminent domain award to the prepayment o the Lease Payments underkSection ' SECTION 6.2. Application of Net Proceeds. The Net Proceeds of any insurance award resulting from any^damage to or destruction of the Project by fire or other casualty, and the Net Proceeds of any eminent domain award, shall be deposited in the Insurance and Condemnation Fund by the Trustee promptly upon t � receipt thereof and, if the City determines that the replacement, repair, restoration, modification or improvement of the Project is not economically ± � feasible or in the best interest of the City, then such Net Proceeds shall be promptly transferred by the Trustee to the Lease Payment Fund and applied as �.• provided in Section 10.3; provided, however, that in the event of damage or t. destruction of the Project in full , such Net Proceeds may be transferved to the q Lease Payment Fund only if sufficient, together with other moneys available '. therefor, to cause the redemption of all outstanding Certificates. All Net i Proceeds deposited in the Insurance and Condemnation Fund and not so transferred to '1 the Lease Payment Fund shall be applied to the prompt replacement, repair, restoration, modification or improvement of the Project by the City, upon receipt of a requisition acceptable to the Trustee signed by the City Representative and countersigned by the Eank Representative, stating with respecL to each payment to be made (i) the requisition number, (ii) the name and address of the person, Firm or f + corporation to whom payment is due, (lit) the amount to be paid and (iv) that each obligation mentioned therein has been properly incurred, is a proper charge against the Insurance and Condemnation Fund, has not been the basis of any previous withdrawal , and specifying in reasonable detail the nature of the obligation, accompanied by a bill or a statement of account for such obligation. Any balance of the Net Proceeds remaining after such work has been completed shall be paid to the r City. 19 ARTICLE III DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES; ACCESS SECTION 7. 1. Disclaimer c• Warranties. THE AFE<<"_Y MAKES NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EITHER EXPRESS­OR _IMPLIEO, AS TO THE VALUE, DESIGN, CONDITION, MERCHANTIBII.ITY OR FIT14ESS FOR At;Y PARTICULAR PURPOSS OR FITNESS FOR THE USE CONTEMPLATED BY THE CITY OF THE PROJECT OR THE SITE OR ANY ITEM THEREOF, OR A14Y I OTHER REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT OR THE SITE OR ANY ITEM THEREOF. Its NO EVENT SHALL THE AGENCY BE LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, IN CO►,NECTION WITH OR ARISING OUT OF THIS LEASE OR THE TRUST AGREEMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE, FURNISHING, FUNCTIONING OR CITY'S USE OF THE PROJECT OR THE SITE. SECTION 7.2. Access to the Site and the Project. The City agrees that the Agency and any Agency Representative, ar , tFre �gencyrs successors or assigns, shall have the right at all reasonable times to enter upon and to examine and inspect the Project and the Site. The City further agrees that the Agency, any such Representative, and the Agv::cy' s successors or assigns shall have such rights of access to the Project and the Site as rray be reasonably necessary to cause the proper maintenance of the Project and the Site in ,the event of -failur by the City to perform its obligations hereunder. �� ! SECTION 7.3. Release and Indemnficiation Covenants. The City snali and hereby agrees to IndemnTfy and 'save'-the Agency harmless from and against all . claims, losses and damages, including legal fees and expenses, arising out of (1) the use, maintenance, condition urmanagement cf, or from any word, or thing done on € the Project or the Site by the City, ( ii) any breach or default on the part of the City in the performance of any of its obligations under this Lease, (III) any act or negligence of the City or of any of its agents, contractors, servants, employees or �y licensees with respect to the Project or the Site, (iv) any act or negligence of any assignee or sublessee of the City with respect to the Project or the Site, or (v) the construction and acquisition of the Project or the authorization of Faymen� of the Construction Costs by the Agency. No indemnification is made under this 1 Section or elsewhere in this Lease for willful misconduct, negligence, or breach of duty under this Lease Agreement by the Agency, its officers, agents, employees, successors or assigns. 4 20 I r • S ARTICLE XIII ASSIGNMENT, SUBLEASINS AND AMENDMENT SECTION 8.1. Assi�nment _by_the Agency. The Agepcy' s rights under this Lease, including the right to receive-and enforce payment of the Lease Payments to be made by the City hereunder have been assigned to the Trustee pursuant to the Assignmen'. Agreement, to which assignment the City hereby consents. t SECTION 8.2. Assignment andSubleasinv by_thr. Cif. This Lease may not be assigned by the City.~The City and__the_Agency agree that units within the Project i are intended to be leases or rented for individual tenant use, in accordance with Section 5. 12 hereof, and nothing in this Lease is intended or shall be construed to prohibit or restrict such leasing or ren'.ing by the City in accordance with Section 5.12 hereof, Except for such tenant use, the Project and the Site may he subleased in whole or in part by the City but only with the written consent of the Agency Representative and the 8anX_Representatiye _and subject to all of the following conditions: - (i) This Lease and the obligation of the City to make Leese Payments hereunder shall remain obligations of the City; and (ii) The City shall , within thirty (30)• days after the delivery thereof, furnish or cause :.o be furnished to the Agency and the Trustee a true and complete copy of such sublease; and (iii) No such sublease by the City shall cause the Project or the Site to be used for a purpose other than a governmental or proprietary function authorized under the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State; and (iv) The City shall furnish the Agency and the Trustee with a written opinion of nationally-recognized bond counsel , with respect to any such i sublease, stating that such sublease shall not cause the interest components of the Lease Payments to become subject to federel or State personal income r... taxes. SECTION 8.3. Amendment of this Lease. ( ►� '��i I{. ' '� (a) Amendment for Additional Financing. This Lease may be amended by the parties hereto aL*a y—" inie during the-Term-of this Lease, without the consent of the Trustee or the Owners of the Certificates, for the purpose of providing for the acquisition, construction or improvement of add!t,ional improvements to the Project; provided, however, that (1) no event of default under and as defined in this Lease shall have occurred and be continuing, (2) the additional Lease Payments resulting from such amendment shah be due and payable on March la and September 15 in each year, (3) an executed copy of arty such amendment ;hal'. be filed with the Trustee promptly following the execution and delivery thereof by the parties thereto, and (4) additional certificates of participation shall be executed and j delivered evidencing proportionate interests of the owners thereef in such additional Lease Payments, pursuant to an amendment to the Trust Agreement or a new L1 i agreement ar, executed copy of which shall be filed with the Trustee promptly following the execution and delivery thereof by the parties thereto. (b) Generals. Except as provided in clause (a) of this Section, without the written consent of the Trustee the City will not alter, modify or cancel , or agree or consent to alter, modify or cancel this lease, excepting only as such alteration or modification may be permitted by Article X of the Trust Agreement. I' i I' I zz i . .. ••w.�,rrrZ'z'} ARTICLE IX EVENTS OF DEFAULT ;AND REMEDIES SECTIN 9.1. Events of Default Defined. The following shalt be "events of default" unc:.-� this Lease and ;tie terms 'events of default" and "default" shall mean, whenever they are used in this Lease, with respect to the Project, any one or more of the following events: (i) Failure by the City to pay any Lease Payment or other payment required to be paid hereunder at the time :specified herein and the continuation_of such failure for a period of ten(l0) days. (ii) Failure by the City to observe and perform any covenant, condition or agreement on its part to be observed or performed, other than as referred to in clause (i) of this Section, for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice specifying such failure and requesting that it be remedied has been given to the City by the nc the Trustee or the Owners of not less than five percent " ti Agency, t v pe ce (5ti) in aggregate principal amount of Certificates then outstanding; provided, however, if the failure stated in the noticelcan be corrected but not within the applicable period, the Agency, the Trustee ana`suc Owners shall not unreasonably withhold their consent to an extension of �+ such time if corrective action is instituted by the Civy within the applicable period and diligently pursued until the default is corrected. (III) The entry of an order or decree, by�a.caurt _having_j2risdiction in the premises, for relief against the City in an involuntary case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, or appointing a receiver, iiquidator, assignee, custo::►an, trustee, sequestratur (or other similar official) of the City or of any substantial part of its property, or ordering the winding up or liquidation of its affairs, and the continuance of such order or decree unstayud and in effect for a period of fifteen (15) t consecutive days; or the ir!,titution or commencement by the the City of a voluntary case under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar law now or ! :•reafter in effect, or the consent by it to the entry of an order for relic' against it in any involuntary case under any such law, or to the appointment of a receiver, liquidator, assiynee;-custodian, trustee, sequestrator (or other similar official, of( the ,the)City or of any substantial part of its property, or the raking by-it of an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or the failure of it generally to pay its debts as they become due, or the admission by it in writing of such failure, or the taking of any corporate action by the the City in furtherance of any such action, or if any receiver of the property or assets of the the City shall be appointed by any court, except a receiver appointed at the instance or request of the City. 1 23 (iv) The City' s interest in this Agreement or any part thereof be assigned or transferred, either voluntarily or by operation of law. (v) There shall have occurred any event of default under (and as defined) in the Reimbursement Agreement or the Deed of Trust, and the Trustee shall have received from the rani, written notification of such event of default. { SECTION 9.2. /\Acceleration. Whenever any event of default referred to in i subsections (ii) or (iv) of Section 9. � hereof shall have happ�nPd and be continuing, thheTrustee may_take an,, one or more of the following remedial steps: (a) If an event of default has occurred as defined under subsections (ii) or (iv) of Section 9.1 and is continuing, then and in each and every such case during the continuance of such evert default, unless the principal components of all of the Lease Payments shall have already become due and payable, the Trustee may, and upon the written request of the Owners oft not less than twenty-five percent (25%) in aggregate principal mount of the Certificates at the time outstanding, the Trustee shall , declare the principal components of ail unpaid Lease Payments, together with any unpaid interest components theretofore having come due and payable, to be due and payable immediately, and upon any such declaration the same shall become and shall. be immediately due and payable, anything in this Lease Agreement or in the Trust Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding. I (b) If an event of default has occurred under subsections (i), (iii) or (iv) of Section 9.1 and is continuing, the Trustee shall ^eclare the principal components of all unpaid Lease Payments, together with any unpaid interest components theretofore having come due and payable, to be due and payable �. immediately, and upon any such declaration the same shall become and shall be immediately due and payable, anything in this Lease Agreement or in the Trust Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding. The foregoing provisions, are subject to the condition that if, at any time after the principal of the Lease Payments shall have been so declared to or have so became due and payable because of an event of default under subsections (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) only of Section 9. 1, and before any judgment or decree for the payment i of moneys clue shall have been obtained or entered as hereinafter provided, and before any drawing has been made under the Letter of Credit, there shall have been deposited with the Trustee a sum sufficient to pay all principal components of the Lease Payments having come due and payable prior to such declaration and all interest components, with interest thereon at the rate of twelve percent (12a)_per annum, and the reasonable expenses of the Trustee, and any and all otherkdell known to ti,e Trustee (other than in the payment of principal and interest payaW solely by reason of such declaration) shall have been made good or cured to the satisfaction of the Trustee or provision deemed by the Trustee to be adequate shall have been maL-' therefor, then, and in every such case, the Owners of at least a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Certificates then outstanding, by written notice to the Trustee and the City, may on behalf of the Owners of all the Certificates rescind and annul such declaration and ints' consequences and Naive such default; but no such rescission and annulment shall extend to or shall affect 1 24 , any subsequent default, or shall impair or exhaust any right or power consequent thereon. SECTION 9.3. Other Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an event of default hereunder, the Trustee may pursue any available remedy, in addition to the remedies specified in Section 9.02, at law or in equity to enforce the obligations of the City under this Lease Agreement. SECTION 9.4. No Remedy Exclusive. Nc, remedy h:, ein conferred upon or reserved to the Agenca, or the�Trustee is intend?d to be exclusive and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this, Lease or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruin:7 upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the Agency to exercise any remedy reserved to it in this Article it shall not be necessary to give any notice, other than such notice as may be required in this Article or by law. SECTION 9.5. Agreement to Pa,y Attorneys' Fees and Expenses. In the event either party to this Lease should default under any of the provisions hereof and the nondefaulting party should employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of moneys or the enforcement or performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of the defaulting party herein contained, the defaulting party agrees that 4t will on demand therefor pay to the nondefaulting party the reasonable fees of such attor ays �andjsuch'other expenses so incurred by the nondefaulting party. ►r, j SECTION 9.6, No Additional Waiver Implied. by One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained 5-it is Lease sti;iuld be�breached by either party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive ar•y other breach hereunder. i SECTION 9.7. Appl_ication of Proceeds.AAll amounts derived by the Agency or the Trustee as a result of an event of default hereunder, shall be transferred to the Trustee promptly upon receipt thereof and shall be deposited by the Trustee in the Lease Payment Fund to be appl ied&_as �r9yided In Section 13.04 of the Trust Agreement. SECTION 9.8. Trustee and Certificate Owners to Exercise _Rights. Such rights and remedies as are given to the Agency under this Article IX have been assigned by the Agency to the Trustee under the Assignment Agreement, to which assignment the City hereby consents. Such rights and remedies shall be exercised by the Trustee and the Owners of the Certificates as provided in the Trust Agreement. SECTION 9.9. Liability_ Limited to Revenues. No..twthstanding,_Anyth.ing.._'r thi s Agreement, the Ci ty''s 'l i abi I i ty'to pay aid prepay the Lease Payments and other amounts hereunder shall be limited solely to the Revenues as provided in Section 4.5, and no City funds or property other than the Revenues shall be liable to pay or prepay any Installment Pa.,rment or any such other amount in the event of deficiency In the Revenues for such purpose. 25 __.._... .,4.,... ._. .. ... ..... .., ..,. .. ... .. .. . . _......_ . .._ _....._ ._..____r._t.._.......,......,of.-sn.:�;c6 ARTICLE X PREPAYMENT OF LEASE PAYMENTS SECTION 10.1. Security Deposit. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the City may on any date secure the payment of Lease Payments by a deposit with the Trustee of; (i) an amount which, together with amounts on deposit in the Lease Payment Fund and the Reserve Fund, is sufficient to pay all unpaid Lease Payments, including the principal and interest components thereof, in accordance with the Lease Payment schedule set forth in Exhibit A, or (ii) Federal Securities together with cash, if required, in such amount as will , in the opinion of an independent certified public accountant, together with interest to accrue thereon and, if required, all or a portion of moneys or Federal Securities then on deposit in the Lease Payment Fund and Reserve Fund, be fully sufficient to nay all i Unpaid Lease Payments on their respective Lease Payment dates or by prepayment; thereof pursuant to Section 10.2 hereof, as the City shall instruct at the time ot° said deposit. In the event of a deposit pursuant to this Section, all obligation: / of the City under this Lease Agreement, and all security provided by this Lease? rAgreement for said obligations, shall cease and terminate, excepting only the obligation of the City to make, or cause to be made, Lease Payments from the deposit I ' made by the City pursuant to this Section, and title to the Project shall vest in the City on the date of said deposit automatically and without further action by the City or the Agency, provided that title shall be subject to the subsequent ��� � ,��•� payment of Lease Payments made from said deposit in accordance with the provisions ' of this lease Agreement. Said deposit shall be deerred to be and shall constitute a special fund for the payment of Lease Payments in accordance with the provisions of this Lease Agreement. SECTION 10.2. Optional Prepayment. The City may exercise its option to purchase the Project aria the Site on any Prepayment Date, by paying the applicable Prepayment Pric: as shown in Exhibit 8, toge•6 "r with the interest companent of the Lease Payr,Nnt required to be paid on such Prepayment Date. Such Prepayment Price shall be deposited by the Trustee in the Lease Payment Fund to be applied to the redemption of Certificates pursuant to Section 4.01(a) of the Trust Agreement. The City shall give the Trustee notice of its intention to exercise its option not less than sixty (60) days in aevance of the date of exercise. r SECTION 10.3. Mandatory Prepayment From Net Proceeds of Insurance or Eminent Domain. The City shall be obliga:2d to prepay the Lease Payments,in wi,oIe or in part,­66-%ny•March.-15 or September 15' beginning September 15, 1984, from and i to the extent of ani llet Proceedi"of 'insurance award or condemnation award with respect to such Project and Site theretofore deposited in the Lease Payment Fund for such purpose pursuant to ArticlehVI hereof. The City and the Agency hereby agree that such Net Proceeds, to the extent remaining after payment of any delinquent Lease Payments, shall be credited towards the City's obligations under this Section. SECTION 10.4. Credit for Amounts on Deposit. In the event of prepayment of the principal components of the Lease Payments in full under this Article X, such that the Trust Agreement shall be discharged by its terms as a result of such prepayment, all amounts then on deposit to the Lease Payment Fund, the Construction 26 . , i Fund or the Reserve Fura ;hall be credited to►,•ards the amounts then required to be so prepaid. 1� . I i i 27 I � 1 ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 11. 1. Notices. All notices, certificates or other communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed to have been received 48 hours after deposit in the United States mail in registered or certified form with postage fully prepaid: If to the City: City of Huntington Seach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: City Administrator If to the Agency: Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Chief Executive Officer If to the Trustee: Security Pacific-ldational Bank 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Attention: Corporate Trust Department If to the Bank_ _ Golden State Sanwa Eank_ "-� - .�... '90C'. East�llalleyBou'pvard Rosemead, California 91770 Attention: Municipal Services (Division ' The Agency, the City and the Trustee; by notice given hereunder, may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or other communications will be sent. SECTION 11. 2. Binding Effect. This Lease sh.:ll inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Agency and the City and their respective successors and assigns. 1 SECTION 11.3. Severability. In the event any provision of this Lease shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall nut invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. SECTION 11.4. Net-net-net Lease. This Lease shall be deemed and construed to be a "net-net-r-A lease" and the City hereby agrees that the Lease Payments shall be an absolute net returrr, to the Agency, free and clear of any expenses, counterclaims, charges or ;et-offs whatsoever. SECTION 11.5. Further Assurances and Corrective Instruments. The Agency and the City agree that they will , from+time to time, execute, and deliver, or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, such supplements hereto and such further instruments as may reasonably be required for correcting 28 i any inadequate or incorrect description of the Project hereby leased or intended so 1• to be or for carrying out the expressed intention of this Lease. } SECTION 11.6. Execution in Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in several counterparts, each o. which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. r If SECTION 11.7. Applicable Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance witn the laws of the State.. SECTION 11.8. Agency and City'Representatives. Whenever under the t provisions of this Lease the approval of the Agency, the_Bank or the City is t Agency r the City is required to take some action at the request I required, or he g y o y q q _ of the ofher, such h approval or such request shall be given for the Agency bYAthe , Agency Representative, for the Bank by the Bank Representative and for the City by t,the City Representative, and any party Ye—ii—o-sh,a1T"be au orized to rely upon any such approval or request. SECTION 11.9. Captions. The captions or headings in this Lease are for convenience only and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or Section of this Lease. r; iS Y 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the agency has caused this Lease to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officer and sealed with its corporate seal ; and the City has caused this Lease to be executed in its name by its duly authorized officers, as of the date first above written. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, as Lessor l (S E A L) By _ Chairman r By Chief Executive Officer Approved as to form: Attest: Agency AttarneyM Secretary iCITY OF HUNTINGTON BE;tH, as Lessee � HY _ _._. May. By City Administrator i (SEAL) Approved as to form: Attest: f City Attorney City Clerk i i i 30 GXHIEIT A SCHEDULE_OF ^LEASE_PAYMENTS j Interest Principal Payment Date Component Cor^po^ent Total Lease Payment - nt - - - - 1 Closing Date" October 1,. 19B5 April 1 , 1986 October 1, 1986 April 1, 1987 i October 1 , 1987 April 1, 198B October 1, 1988 April 1, 1989 October 1 , 1989 April 1 , 1990 October 1, 1990 April 1, 1991 October 1, 1991 April 1, 1992 October 1, 1992 , April 1, 1993 'x October 1, 1993 April 1, 1994 October 1, 1994 April 1, 1995 f(•.. October 1, 1995 April 1, 1996 October 1, 1996 April 1, 1997 October 1, 1997 April 1, 1998 October 1, 1998 s+' April 1, 1999 + +. October 1999 1 ;t * Lease Payment of advance rental to be funded from proceeds of the Certificates I deposited in the lease Payment Fund pursuant to Section 3. 1. f 31 I l Interest Principal moment Date Component Component Total Cease Payment April 1, 2000 October 1, 2000 April 1, 2001 October 1, 2001 Apri 1 1, 2002 1 October 1, 2002 Apri 1 1, 2003 October 1, 2003 April 1, 2004 October 1, 2004 April 1, 2005 October 1, 2005 April 1, 2006 October 1, 2006 Apri 1 1, 2007 October 1, 2007 Apri 1 1, 2008 October 1, 2008 April 1, 2009 ' October 1, 2009 April 1, 2010 October 1, 2010 April 1, 2011 October 1, 2011 April 1, 2012 October 1, 2012 April 1, 2013 October 1, 2013 April 1, 2014 I 32 EXNI°1T 0 SCNFOULE OF PREPAYMENT DATES AND PRICES Prepayment Date Prepay»ment_Price September 15, 1994 March 15, 1995 September 15, 1995 March 15, 1996 September 15, 1996 March 15, 1997 September 15, 1997 March 15, 1998 September IE, 1998 March 15, 1999 September 15, 1999 March 15, 2000 September 15, 2000 March 15, 2001 September 15, 2001 March 15, 2002 September 15, 2002 ' March 15, 2003 September 15, 2003 March 15, 2004 September 15, 2004 March 15, 2005 September 15, 2005 March 15, 2006 September 15, 2006 March 15, 2007 � September 15, 2007 (� March 15, 2008 September 15, 2008 March 15, 2009 September 15, 2009 March 15, 2010 September 15, 2010 March 15, 2011 September 15, 2011 March 15, 2012 September 15, 2012 March 15, 2013 September 15, 2013 March 15, 2014 September 15, 42U14 March 15, 2015 September 15, 2015 33 t EXHIBIT C t LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE. s I (TO COME) I t J I 1 � I r �j t � I } i I i i t :t t I( 7 Z 34 ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared _ and known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory } evidence) to tie the Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the Redevelopment Agency of thy_ City of Huntington Beach, the public body that executed the within instrument, and known to me to be the persons wH-% executed the within instrument on { behalf of said public body herein named. WITNESS my hand and official seal . i " I Notary Public in and for said County and State (SEAL) My commission expires; i I ' i I � I I 35 i STATE' OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) E On r, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared and , known to me (or proved to me on the-basi s of satisfactory evidence to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Huntington Beach, the municipal corporation that executed the within instrument and known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal . Notary Public-in and for said County ' and State (SEAL) My commission expires: _ , i i 1 t I i I 36 FINAL-APYM54Z December 20, 1982 l i 1 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT By and Between THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ("Agency") and COLLINS•ZWEIBEL DEVELOPMENT ("Participant") 'i 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A e I. SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT Z A. Purpose of the Agreement 1 d. The Redevelopment Plan 1 C. The Project Area 2 D. Classification of Property Covered by This 2 ! Ayreement E. Parties to the Agreement 2 F. Prohibition Against Change in Ownership, 3 Management and Control of Participant I � II. f?ESpONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANT 4 A. Dedication Gf Real Property 4 P. Developmant by Participant 4 C. ?rovision of Affordable Units 4 D. Conveyance of Real Property to Agency 5 E. Due Diligence by Participant 5 F. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Insurance; fi Worker's Compensation G. City and Other Governmental Agency Permits 7 H. Rights of Access for Inspection of Construction 7 I. Local, State and Federal Laws 8 J. Provision of Mortgage and Construction 8 Financing III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AGENCY 8 A. Approval of Entitlements to Use 9 B. Provision of Public Rights-of-Way and 9 Improvements C. Provision of Mortgage Financing 10 D. Implementation of Redevelopment Plan 10 E. Acquisition and Conveyance of Real Property 1 F. Certificate of Completion 1 IV. OTHER PROVISIONS 12 A. Obligations to Refrain from Discrimination 12 J B. Taxes, Assessments, Encumbrances and Liens 12 C. Rights of Obligees 12 D. Maintenance of Site 13 E. Rights of Access for Construction, 13 Reconstruction and Repair F. Notices, Demands and Communications Between 13 the Parties G. Conflict of Interest; City's Representative 14 Not Individually Liable H. Enforced Delay; Extensions of Times of 14 Performance 1. Title of Sections 14 J. Hold Harmless 15 K. Counterparts 15 L. Entire Agreement, Waivers and Amendments 15 M. Participant Not to Construct Over Utility 15 Easements i V. DEFAULT, REMEDIES AND TERMINATION 16 A. Defaults - General 16 B. Legal Actions 16 C. Applicable Law 17 D. Acceptance of Service of Process 17 E. Rights and Remedies are Cumulative 17 F. Inaction Not a Waiver of Default 17 G. Execution of Agreement. 18 ATTACHMENTS No. I Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Pro4.-ct Area 21 No. 2 Collins-Zweibel Project Site 22 No. 3 Property Disposition 14ap 23 No. 4 Legal Description of Parcels 24 ilo. 5 Precise Plan for Street Alignment 25 No. 6 Scope of Development 26 No. 7 Schedule of Performance 29 I i I ii j PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT I THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on ,�ps ,,� tga_ _, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter called the "Agency"), and COLLINS-ZWEIBEL DEVELOPMENT, a Partnership (hereinafter called the "Participant"). The Agency and participant covenant and agree as follows: I. SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT i A. Purpose of tho Agreement j l The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan") which has been prepared for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment i Project Area ("Project Area") and adopted by the City Council on September 20, 1982 (see Attachment No. 1), by providing for the development and use of that i i portion of the Project Area, hereinafter called the "Site" (see Attachment No. i 2), and located within the Redevelopment Survey Area established by the Huntington Beach City Council on February 1, 1982. This Agreement is entered into for the purposes of development and not for speculation in land. The ( P P P P development of the Size pursuant to this .'agreement, and the fulfillment of the i Agreement, are in the best interests of the City of Huntington Beach (the f "City") and the health, safety and welfare of its residents, and is in accord with the public purposes and prnvisions of applicable Federal, State and local laws and requirements under which the Project has been undertaken. Time -is of the essence as to mattars covered by this Agreement. B. The Redevelopment Plan This Agreement will be subject to the provisions of the adopter' Plan which became effective on October 20, 1982. -------------- C. The Project Area yThe Project Area is located in the City of Huntington Beach, California, the exact boundaries of which are specifically described in City Council Ordinance No. 2577, which instrument is incorporated herein by reference and that portion encompassing the Site as delineated on Attachment No. 2 which is made a part hereof. i f D. Classification of Property Covered k This Agreement i The classes of property covered by this Agreement are as follows: i „ .. � I. The "Site" That portion of the Project Area which is to be developed by Participant in two or more phases as delineated by Attachment No. 2, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. "Parcel I" - Those portions of the Project Area which are currently owned by Participant which will be conveyed to the Agency under the terms of this Agreement (see Attachment No. 3). i 3. "Parcel 2" - Those portions of the Project Area which are to , be acquired by the Agency and conveyed to Participant under the terms of this Agreement (see Attachment No. 3). 4. "Parcel 3" - That portion of the Site owned, or to be owned, by Participant which will be dedicated for public right-of-way purposes (see Attachment No. 3). 4. "Parcel 4" - That portion of the Site which will be dedicated i as a pedestrian easement to provide access to Terry Park (see Attachment j I No. 3). Each of these parcels are described in detail on Attachment No. 4. E. Parties to the Agreement I. The Agency -- 1 w ill Tha Agency is a public body, corporate and politic, exercising I 2 I, I! +...... ......... . ... ._. .__.. ..... .. .......�...............rrt..i.ltJ'.'T I governmental functions and powers, organized and existing under the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California. The principal office of the Agency is located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. "Agency", as used in this Agreement, includis the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, and any successor to its rights, powers and responsibilities. 2. The Participant Participant is a Partnership that qualifies as an owner-participant as that term is used in the Plan and in the California Community Redevelopment Law. The address of the Participant for the purposes of this Agreement is 231 1/2 South Gale Drive, Beverly lulls, California 90211. F. Prohibition Against Chancre in Ownerships Management and Control of Participant The qualifications and identities of Participant are of particular concern to the City and the Agency. It is because of these qualifications and identities that the Agency has entered into this Agreement with the i Participant. No voluntary or involuntary successor in interest of Participant shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement except as expressly set forth herein; provided, however, that Participant shall h•zve the right to bring in partners and co-venturers conditioned upon (1) such additional parties agreeing to be bound by all provisions hereof and expressly assuming in writing (to the satisfaction of the Agency) the obligations of Pz,ri.icipant hereunder to the extent of their participation, and (2) Participant remaining fully liable and responsible hereunder. The Participant shall not assign all or any part of this Agreement 3 without the prior written approval of the Agency. This Agreement may be terminated by the Agency if there is any significant change (voluntary or involuntary) in membership, management or control of the Participant prior to the completion or control of the Site. II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANT A, Dedication of Re31 Proper j Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Participant shall i agree to dedicate to the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation, all lots, or portions thereof, owned by Participant necessary for the provision of public rights-of-way as established by the Precise Plan for Street Alignment, which is included as Attachment No. 5, and establish the designated pedestrian easement, as delineated on Attachment No. 3,, with both attachments being incorporated herein by reference. s B. Developnignt by Pe..eti_ cipant The Site, as delineated on Attachment No. 2, shall be developed in phases by Participant in conformance with all provisions of this Agreement including the terms, conditions and timing set forth in the Scope of Development (Attachment No. 6) and the Schedule of Performance (Attachment No. 7). The development of the Site shall under no circumstances exceed sixty I i (60) market-rate residential dwelling units. C. Provision of Affordable Units • ;ti 1. With appropriate City approval, Participant shall be allowed to provide a maximum of twenty (20) affordable units in addition to the sixty (60) market-rate units. These additional units will be provided in a manner consistent with any such policy which the City subsequently ly adopts. 1 4 2. Participant shall establish a means to insure, with City approval, that said units remain affordable to target buyers for a specified period of time established by the City. The content and form of said means shall be incorporated into any deed conveying said affordable units to buyers and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City prior to recordation by Participant. D. Conveyance of Real Property to Agency 1. Following the execution of this Agreement, Agency shall, at its own expense, secure the services of a recognized title insurance firm and shall secure evidence of the free and marketable nature of the title to Parcel 1 as is found to be sufficient and `cceptable to Agency. 2. Within seven (7) days following notice to Participant by Agency that the title to Parcel 1 is clear and acceptable to Agency, Participant will convey title to all the non-contiguous components of said Parcel 1. The conveyance of title to the entire Parcel 1 to the Agency is being done as total compensation for the Agency's conveyance of Parcel 2 to Participant and the development of the public improvements and public utilities as set forth in the Scope of i; Development which will serve the project. ? E. Due Diligence by Participant After the execution of this document by the Agency, the Participant i . shall promptly begin and thereafter diligently pursue to completion the construction of the improvements and phased development of the Site within the tines specified in the "Schedule of Performance", which is incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Attachment No. 7. 5 F. Bodily _Injury and Property Damage Insurance; Worker's Compensation Prior to commencement of any work hereunder, Participant shall obtain a policy of comprehensive bodily injury and property damage liability insurance and maintain such policy in effect until the final Certificate of Completion provided for in this Agreement has been issued, providing coverage for bodily injury and property d-xnage in the minimum amount of $300,000 combined single limit per occurrence. The policy shall name, as additional assureds, Agency, the City of Huntington Beach, and their officers and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against all claims, suits, or other actions of any nature brought for or on account of any deaths, injuries, damage or loss, ari- ing out of or connected with the work of Participant under this Agreement. Participant shall furnish Agency a certificate of insurance from the insurer evidencing compliance with tnis paragraph and providing that the insurer shall not cancel or modify the policy without thirty (30) days' prior i written notice to Agency. Participant shall give Agency prompt and timely , i notice of any claim made or suit instituted. Agency, City and their officers and employees shall also be named as additional insureds in any policies of Participant's contractors covering work under this Agreement, and such policies shall comply with this paragraph. i Participant shall comply with all of the provisions of the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Divisions a and 5 of the California Labor Code, and �I all amendments thereto; and all similar state or federal acts or laws Ij applicable, and Participant shall hold Agency and City harmless from any claims arising thereunder. Participant shall furnish to Agency a certificate of Worker's Compensation insurance providing that the insurer shall not cancel 1 6 or modify the policy without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Agency. In the alternative, Participant may show proof of a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations according to California Labor Code Section 3800. G. City and Other Governmental Agency Permits i Before commencement of construction or development of any fbuildings, structures or other work or improvement upon the Site or within the Project Area by the Participant, the Participant shall, at its own expense, except for the replatting and/or resubdivision of the Site, secure or cause to be secured, any and all entitlements to use that may be require-1 by the City or any other governmental agency affected by such construction, development or I� work. The Agency shall provide all proper assistance to the Participant in securing these permits. Such entitlements required by, and fees assessed by the City of Huntington Beach may include, but are not limited to: 2. Conditional Use Permit and Fee; 2. Plan Check and Building Permits; 3. Water and Sewer Connection Fees; 4. Park and Recreation Fees; 5, County Sanitation District Fees; f 6. Cultural Enrichment Fee; i 7. Public Works Encroachment Permit Fee; I i 8. Environmental Impact Report Fee. H. Rights of Access for Inspection of Construction Representatives of the Agency and the City shall have the right of access to the Site without charges or fees, at normal hours during the period 7 of construction for the purposes of this Agreement including, but not limited ! to, the inspection of the work being performed in constructing the improvements. Such representatives of the Agency shall be City employees who i i normally carry out such functions, or persons who are so identified in writing by the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency. I. Local, State and Federal Laws The Participant shall carry out the construction of the improvements in conformity with all the applicable laws and regulations including all applicable Federal and State labor standards. J. Provision of Mortgage and Construction Financing 1. The Agency will wort: with the Participant in an effort to i obtain tax exemptmortgage financing for the residential units to be constructed by Participant. However, if it is the determination of the Agency and/or Participant that tax exempt mortgage financing cannot be provided beca4.3e of legal, financial or time constraints, then the provision of private mortgage financing will be the sole responsibility of the Participant. 2. The Participant shall be solely responsible for the provision of the construction loan financing for all improvements to be provided by Participant. III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AGENCY The Agency, without expense to the Participant or assessment or claim, against the Site and prior to completion of the improvements on the Site (or at such times as may be set forth in the Schedule of Performance) shall, in accordance with the Plan and the design for development, provide or secure, or cause to be provided or secured, the following; 8 k� .... _ . �.� . .. . . _ .... . . .,, . ._.. .. .,. . ._... . ,...._ .. .. _...till I i i • i I A. Approval of Entitlements to Use 1. The Agency shall provide all proper assistance to Participant in securing all necessary entitlements to use for the project. 2. The Agency, at its own expense, shall be responsible for the resubdivision of the Site as necessary to establish the major parcels shown as Phase I and Phase II on Attachment No. 2. 3. The Agency, at its own expense, will provide Participant wl'th available soils information obtained in the design of and engineering work conducted for the improvements within the adjoining public rights-of-way. B. Provision of Public Rights-of-Way and Improvements 1. Agency shall acquire or obtain the dedication of all parcels or portions thereof not under the control of Participant necessary to provide the public rights-of-way and access to the Site as established i in the Precise Plan for Street Alignment (see Attachment No. 5). 2. Agency shall construct, at nn expense to Participant, the public streets, sidewalks,, street lighting, and provide the required landscaping and trees �githin the public rights-of-way, 3. Agency shall provide, at no expense to Participant, the instaliation or relocation (by the City or by the appropriate public t body or public utility company) of such sewers, drains, Muter and gas distribution lines, electric, telephone and telegraph lines, and all other public utility lines, installations and facilities as are necessary to be installed in the public rights-of-way. Except, that the City shall not be responsible for, nor bear any portion of the cost of, installing the necessary utility connections within the boundaries of � • the Site between the improvements to be constructed on the Site by, the r i Participant and the water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain mains or other public utility lines owned by the City or by any public utility company within or without such boundaries, or electric, gas, telephone or other public utility lines owned by any public utility company within or without such boundaries, and the Participant shall secure any permits required for such installation without cost or expense to the City. C. Provision of Mortgage Financing 1. Agency shall pursue with all due diligence the provision of tax exempt mortgage revenue bond financing for the residential units to be developed on the Site by Participant to the extent enabled by and in conformance with the provisions of all State and Federal legislation and regulations governing such tax exempt financings, and to the extent permitted by the condition of the bond market. 2. The assessment of the bond market conditions and the feasibility of providing tax exempt financing for the Participant will . be mutuolly determined by the Agency and Participant. D. Implementation of Redevelopment Plan Agency shall pursue with all due diligence, and in conformance with ' thp_ "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto and incorporated herein by 'I reference, the implementation of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Plap in a manner cnnsistent with the State of California Community Redevelopment Act. E. Acquisition and Conveyance of Real Property Agency shall acquire all real property which is delineated as f f Parcel 2 on Attachment No. 3, and convey clear title tc such real property to Participant by grant deed, or other means acceptable to Participant, as set forth in the Schedule of Performance. i 10 F. Certificate of Cam 1p etion 1. Promptly after completion of all construction required of Participant within the Site, the Agency shall furnish the Participant with a Certificate of Completion upon written request therefor by the Participant. The Agency shall not unreasonably withhold any such Certificate of Completion. Such Certificate of Completion shall be conclusive determination of satisfactory completion of the construction required by this Agreement within the Site. After issuance of such Certificate of Completion, any party then owning or thereafter purchasing, leasing or otherwise acquiring any interest therein shall not (because of such ownership, purchase, lease or acquisition), incur any obligation or liability under this Agreement. After issuance of a Certificate of Completion, the respective rights and obligations of the parties with reference to the Site shall be limited thereafter to those set forth in the deed and the Redevelopment Plan. 2. A Certificate of Completion of construction for the improvements within the Site shall be in such form as to permit it to be recorded in the County Recorder's Office of Orange County. 3. If the Agency refuses or fails to furnish a Certificate of Completion for the Site after written request from the Participant, the Agency shall, within ten (10) days of the written request, provide the Participant with a written statement of the reasons the Agency refused or failed to furnish a Certificate of Completion. The statement shall also contain the Agency's opinion of the action the Participant must take to obtain a Certificate of Completion. If the reasons for such refusal are confined Lo the immediate unavailability of specific items or materials for landscaping or beautification, the Agency will issue 11 F • � _ J l iits Certificate of Completion upon the posting of a bond by the Participant with the Agency in an amount representing a fair value of the work not yet completed. 4. Such Certificate of Completion shall not constitute evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any obligation of the Participant to any entity providing construction loan financing, contract or I � subcontract services, or any other form of obligation. Such Certificate of Completion is not a notice of completion as referred to in the California Civil Code, Section 3093. IV. OTHER PROVISIONS i A. Obligations to Refrain from Discrimination 1. There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any f person, or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the sate, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site; nor shall the Participant itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices in any regard, including the selection of contractors or subcontractors for construction or maintenance. B. Taxes,_ Assessments, Encumbrances and Liens The Participant shall pay when due all real estate taxes and assessments assessed and levied upon the Site until such time as the title to the residential units is conveyed to purchasers. C. Ri2hhts of Obligees The provisions of this Agreement do not limit the right of obligees to foreclose or otherwise enforce any mortgage, deed of trust or other 12 encumbrance upon the Site or the rights of obligees to pursue any remedies for the enforcement or any pledge or lien upon the Site; provided, however, that in the event of a foreclosure sale under any such mortgage, deed of trust, or other lien or encumbrance, or sale pursuant to any power of sale contained in any such mortgage or deed of trust, the purchaser or purchasers and their successors and assigns, and the Site shall be, and shall continue to be, subject to all the conditions, restrictions and covenants herein provided and the provisions of the Talbert-Reach Redevelopment Plan. D. Maintenance of Site 1. Prior to the commencement of and during the term of construction, the Participant shall maintain the Site and shall keen the Site free from any accumulation of debris or waste materials. E. Rights cf Access for Construction, Reconstruction and Repair 1. The Agency for itself, and for the City and other public agencies, at their sole risk and expense, shall have the right to enter the Sitp at all reasonable times for the purposes of construction, maintenance, repair or service of any public improvements or public facilities located within the Site. Any such entry Shall be made only after reasonable notice to the Participant, and the Agency shall r indemnify and hold the Participant harmless from any claims or 1 liabilities pertaining to any entry, maintenance, repair or service of i any public improvements of public facilities located within the Site. F. Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties Written notices, demands and communications between the Agency and ; 1 the Participant shall be sufficiently given if dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal office of the Agency and to the local office of the Participant as specified 13 } in IMM and (2). Such written notices, demands and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section. G. Conflict of Interests City's Representative Not Individually Liable ? No member, official or employee of the City or Agency shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any f ! such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this 1 i Agreement that affects his personal interest or the interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested. No member, official or employee of the City or Agency shall be personally liable to Participant or any successor in interest in the i event of any default or breach by the City or Agency, or for any amount that may become due to Participant or successor for any obligation under the terms of this Agreement. H. Enforced Dely; Extensions of Times of Performance Performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lockouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, acts of public enemy, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, lack of transportation, governmental agency or entity, or any other causes, provisions and covenants of the Agreement beyond Participant's control. I. Title of Sections Any titles of the several Sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. 1 14 r t I Hold harmless Participant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and Agency in all actions arising from Participant's activities pursuant to this contract. Participant further agrees to provide worker's compensation insurance and supply proof of such insurance on the City's insurance form. Agency agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Participant in all actions arising from Agency's activities pursuant to this contract. K. Counterparts i This Agreement is executed in five (5) counterparts, each of which { is deemed to be an original. L. Entire Agreement, Waivers and Amendments The Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental thereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous r agreements between the pa;oties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter thereof. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing by the appropriate authorities of the Agency or the Participant and all amendments hereto must be in writing by the appropriate authorities of the Agency and the Participant. M. Participant Not to Construct Over Utility Easements Provided that the City, Agency and/or utility companies do not construct in conflict with structures delineated on plans of Participant unless said construction takes place on recorded easements referred to in the preliminary title report, the Participant shall not construct dny building or ' other structure or improvement on, without City approval, over, or within the boundary lines of any easement for public utilities or pedestrian access as 15 f proposed herein or as may be suhsequently established by Agency, City or public utility, unless such construction is provided for in such easement or has been .:;proved by the holder of the easement. If approval for such construction is requested by the Participant, the Agency shall use its best efforts to assure that such approval shall not be withheld unreasonably. V. DEFAULT, REMEDIES AND TERMINATI.ON A. Defaults - General Subject to the extensions of time set forth in Section IV(H), failure or delay by either party to perform any term or provision of this Agreement constitutes a default under this Agreement. The party who so fails or delays must immediately commence to cure, correct or remedy such failure or delay, and shall complete such cure, correction or remedy with reasonable diligence. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any failure or delay by either party in asserting any of its remedies or rights as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies or deprive either such party of its rights to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any Ouch rights or remedies. B. Legal Q-Mons In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or rerredy any default, to recover damages for any default, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 16 1 11 i 4 Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the I County of Orange, State of California, in an appropriate Municipal Court in that County, or in the Federal District Court in the Southern District of California. C. ApRI--cable Law ` The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement, except as to matters governed by Federal laws and regulations. D. Acceptance of Service of process In the event that any legal action is commenced by the Participant against the Agency, service of process on the Agency shall be made by personal service upon the Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of the Agency, or in such other manner as may be provided by law. In the event that any legal action is commenced by the Agency against the Participant, service of process on the Participant shall be made by personal service upon any partner of the Participant and shall be valid whether made within or without the State of California, or in such other manner as may be provided by law. E. Rights and Remedies are Cumulative Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative, and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. F. Inaction Not a Waiver of Default Any failures or delays by either party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate as a waiver of any 17 default or of any such rights or remedies or deprive either such party of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. G. Execution of Agreement This Agreement, when executed by the Participant and delivered to the Agency, must be authorized, executed and delivered by the Agency within thirty (30) days after the date of execution by the Participant or this Agreement shall be void, except to the extent that the Participant shall consent in writing to a further extension of time for the authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement. The date of this Agreement shall be the date when the Agreement shall have been approved by the Agency. S 1 18 I IN WITNCSS WHEREOF, the Agency and the Participant have duly executed this Agreement as of the date First above mentioned. THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Date: Chia rma� ff ATTEST: MICIA M. WENTWORTH Agenc Clerk" By: C1 l Ltu Deputy CO LL NS-ZWEIBEL DEVELOPMENT p�q c p i pa 1 Date: 19 INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT AND FORM • G Director, Business and Industrial Special Legal Counsel Enterprise APPROVED AS TO FORM: -- '4�19 .0 "1 .'� Ag cy Attorney APPROV Chiefxecut ve Office ;I 1 i 1 20 1 Attachment No. 1 TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA f . , • • • • • • • 1 ©j Q G il- • I 1 lkd AX di 1 m� .9.c.r r - A . ' A AA QD + • •. .• (g) •�+t r `. (A.r• Tar. ?. r; i ••j •• ; �, , ; Am !firer ttla r low •M-9 w r w ? W Q ....,. i h 9! s 1 c 1 t t r r reds ar.r ri,iw � �r w r rdw r �.t'1"ilililtliu•rlal� • 21 I TAL BERT y - 64 ■■■w>;�o■�r r pm r sr■ r r a. � o !T . ■(!O) r>t� ws■�■ssts■�� s ns.■ts�rs,s■s.■■ �■■■esreww -- - -- — �l �"_ 1 I ter..■ I � � r/T,4cr ,�P 0 17 0 -i - - - . ' - - - -- - -- _ _Mar a �z B t i v ��- 0 • T�8 !, !g t L3 /a 31 t r is .t6 /T to - _ Y !.Pig 9 -- - - - S B 3 3/ r� $ - 14) E_ f / j t2 j• jB 99 ' ` -10 ' .t��t< — ` — ■ ■ ■ Q _ _ _t43 y`=- - t•JS C ' '46 i so - 4 - - jST_`r t5o `tot? - I _ _ _ S- - TSB _ _ •`c T_._ - _ rrn 'y+ r`•�- --- .S2 �f53 - _ 65 13} db- _ pl Z 4 i� I . i • ti _ ca �r2 i6? Ihg 'Fc i' aJ• ij! 17? T i 27_ - `- �- - r ! ( 1 6B _ �69 - ;3 Ca} �: 9 �•_ - - - - i'T _ �f 74 I,S i J - - -i6.r O I B !86. S y' _ c?? _ _ _ &5 _ _87 - _ 4gt�b'\ t EA _ 1 rn 39 i99 �/Ol~ 1C? `9T 99 W9 I 1 [ ■ a� lye.. _1•Y•_ — F+"- -_l.vy. _ I,�y - `.J� � ir / o i 121 s � u4---Jj9 _ Il•:C •IGI I i i - - - 1 �y .tags Ia6 447 Irag s rr s fia ■ ■i ate.s i tt ■1� !� ' OW ISM rsrwre. rAt&ERT . £4 - s r��pi� s Sew i sss/s s sad s aa:a s ss*s s't r,sa J.0r4 R T't?4CT T's-' i7 /o ..JJ-- T2 - - T i8 '9 ,/o //_ 47 .�B - _ a r� o cn o 59l .6 18 !T - -tFF@Z, 9 'o r4 31 r5 .16 /T � /e - - - 1!4 m 3 2? 23 �Pc r9 49) e<iN 5 25 �25 T 8 .29 - P6 - •t2T_ -1z9- _ 29 36 �j0_ _ 25� _ - _ M n .35 ;36_ _r-3 3�T 1 _ _ 3a__ 35 _ e _ 3i- - - r�o c V14 4/ �2 Is2 _ _ 3 GL1. 33 3_9 _ -- �;a �4 JT _ _ o O O - - -+''3 - - :43 =: a - T -- .•8 - �4J- s.: - -.45 - - t46 - - G3 .44 - m n, o o c t- �'C?L.'F;4or -S2 - � �' n o M 106 s�. `t� 55- _ :S�_ _i5� SS t Sa r �a? _ t S s S6_ _ iST _ iSB _ _ 5_5- - _56 m < e+ t62 _ � ' _ 6Q_ SSt�3 Ot,_ _ 61 Z) w _ _ .6-T _ cos _ 65 �l61 tip m i J2 t 6'7--- tad 'so T7 iTJ -p T 68 �69 _ _:;v Gi -68�6 • c� m CD m �; i"3 �a� " ♦S� '.�- _ _'_ _ - T T8 _ '3 TC_ 'T5 _ :7S '7 B _'-• I �_ _ ' ' t7 94 J9 dO tl: to `Cam.. s5__ Wj\10� ns a tl 1 4d - 8o IZ _ _ CBS_ _�86_ _ B� _ _ v'+ G _ _ __i�'_` a6_ _ TJ cp � qv I� toi tC 4 t 'o� tna `© t 5 00A . rc:t (, 9j --- - - - - �� _ t O rM 93 t99 �I0/ IC? '9T QE�L51 99 E x -1/0 - - r l J. _ ►/c_c� �fir _ JJ._ _ ae _16 117 _ 'JIB '• a 26_ _t/21_ ,_,,,��I22 _ 1Z-T - -I/P4 • - �25 - �Ic6 _ _�12! _ �;c2_ t123_ �J2a s o► t s_ _ PED �I 2PSaw -i/3o_ ,�/ ! _ ' _ • _ _ 29 13 r-i- 3 �132 _�2. �J29 � __ m J -i t j' a J - -- �39 _ ?3- _ rj4 _ /J - tlj6 jj-q _ "140_ _614J _ �/�2_ _�f43 _ }144_ _ logo k7�C7 i y •4i �szase50rs1 4 5 ssa6as'J��i�'iciiii�sasf�swr7 �� s 1 t C i f ' 1-111ttachment No. 4 COLLINS-ZWEIBEL PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS NOTE: Exact legal descriptions of the parcels, as delineated on Attachment No. 5, will be established following a field survey. The parcels are all located within Tract No. 172 as shown on a map recorded in Book 12, Page 22, of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, and can be ge^rrally described as follows: PARCEL 1 Lot 38, Block A Lots 18 through 25, Block E; and Lots 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 112, 115, 116, 117, 118, 121, 122, 123, 124, 127, 128, 129, 130, 133, { 134, 135, 136, 139, 140, 141, 142, 145, 146, 147 and 148 of Block A. j Lot 18 of Block B Lots 26, 32, 38 and the westerly 6 feet of lots 21, 27, 33 and 39 of Block C_ PARCEL 2 Lots 89 and 95 of Block B Lots 47, 48, 53, 54, 59, 60, 66 and 72 of Block B PARCEL 3 Lots 107, 108 and northerly 2 feet of lots 113 and 114 of Block A; lots 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108 and the southerly 2 feet of lots 95 and 96 and the northerly 2 feet of lots 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 and 114 of Block B; lots 97, 980 99, 103, 104 and the northerly 2 feet of lots 109 and 110 and the southerly 2 feet of lot 91 and por- tions of lots 10, 92, 93, 94, 100, 105, 111, 87, 88, 81, 82, 75, 76, 69, 70, 63, 64, 57, 58, 52, and the westerly 10 feet of lots 46, 40, j 34, 28, 22, 16, and the easterly 44 feet of lots 21, 27, 33, 39, 45 and 51 of Block C I 1 24 I I i f T.4 L BE RT D JD S rdeEE7,r 4 1 TRACT !o3�'lQ__ 11_ _ `.t? >• a 47 13 2 rc t t, !8� l7 - trB t t� ,,;131 15 - 1/6 17 } r t2 % 7_ g �29 3D %5 AZT !28 -w 36 t= 25 ?6 ' ' a- •o - t -fir� _+ 5! 3_ 14 62 9 t 43 t `_ - .�LT{-,•s_o0 t5Q - _�1 `• -*'21`3- - t5'%_ - 9_ _ ''� _ iSr _ n _ St 54wo L�*3 sg �s •y_, 55- - S�- --5'- - _"° sa t _ tss �- - :S� _ �e - �Q{ � t ! `-t-�- �� -- - bP - �� 6�- 5 l3� 66_ _ 5i ��'� _ _ �`,.'-_ t a 6s�44 s 42 162 r it t67 t68 'cc � •t71 i77 _ , �, - - (� � i -� 6B - -.s9_ _ �_ _ 1102, 67_ 68 E_. R71_ _ `7gt;, _T,:tT �» �!.. 179 t �BI �' tom' ;%9 - _�?-LJ-8rtEa y •• 1 80_ •81 r 55 !0 .66 g, 1( 86 _ 8a 12) - - t e5_ _'6_6 _eT R 6 00 °!1 --F 57 s FA- -- ��_ - --�`- - T93 'US to ' 'o�_ t 3.0Q,4C. _ r t �95 , ,7 07 tog tag t , ' NA S6 ' ,,I:[?_ _►-{I- _ ►11Z �113 t _ 1!45 _ tVI; _ 1117 _ �I ' 'r119 12D_ �IIS _ N6 _ t , - - - - -: _ :IT — FNB _i119_ _t12J- �115 - -116 _t117 _ 'Its J19 * ]� .�I 'IP/ t IZ? t IA1 _ I 144 �125 `!?6_ --+-- - - ►- .- t_ 4 __,_ _,_ - - - - -- I W - t�lj� i131 �132 _ -f2/ _ ^12B _ _ •• r131 41T - _:qc ' r 6 'i� 3T '140 r 1'4_-.�l.3 9_ _ i~4!_ _ �142 _ _'143 `Ic? 39 �tao t1a1 t la2 F143 �Iaa '!30 `_ - _ t f t F -t - '- -t - - -t - -►- - -� - - 'QO_ 4S .Ad 146 ta7 145 F14c Ft50 'kt �.a6 �raT .: •r4g • - t 149 F 1 a fTalfle avt a rrria a!a a�! nra i se 1a4 t 150 u S 146 .147 grit aril 0 on 4 tti�■a�a a•r a.r s r r�i tr w a arm Attachment No. 6 SCOPE CF DEVELOPMENT ! I. DEVELOPMENT BY PARTICIPANT A. Condominium Developer shall design and construct a maximum of sixty (60) market-rate condominium units within the Site and with City approval a maximum of twenty (20) additional "affordable" units. Said units shall be designed and constructed in a manner that is consistent with all City building code and zoning requirements. The improvements constructed by the Participant shall be designed to produce a development of acceptable architectural and aesthetic quality and, with appropriate landscaping, result in a pleasing and harmonious f residential environment. The shape, scale of volume, exterior design and exterior finish of each building shall be visually and physically compatible with adjacent buildings within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area and complement the overall residential neighborhood within which the Site is located. B. Landscaping and Fencing In addition, the Participant shall construct and maintain on-site improvements such as paving, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, sprinklers and 1 other items typically required as part of a project of this nature. Landscaping shall embellish all open spaces within the Site including setback areas, and shall include trees, shrubs, other plants, landscape containers, ?. plaza furniture, top soil, soil preparation, automatic it•rigation and landscaping and pedestrian lighting. Participant shall also construct and maintain an appropriate block wall fence along the entire easterly boundary of the Site and public right-of-way to buffer the proposed residential development from the existing commercial area. ;. 26 f i C Maintenance The Participant shall provide for the maintenance of all improvements, landscaped areas and open spaces within the Site as well as for the adjacent public sidewalks and landscaped parkways. All improvements shall be maintained in good structural condition, painted surfaces kept clean and j neatly painted, working equipment shall be kept in proper working order with a i preventative maintenance program being initiated by the ultimate property owners through a cooperative maintenance program required and recorded as part { of terms of acquisition. Open areas shall be kept free of litter, burned out lights shall be promptly replaced, planted areas shall be maintained in i - healthy growing condition and dead or diseased plants shall be promptly replaced as necessary. II. DEVELOPMENT BY AGENCY A. Streets and Sidewalks i . The Redevelopment Agency, at no cost to Participant, shall construct or cause to be constructed, streets, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements in the public right-of-way adjacent to the Site prior to the completion of development of the condominium units proposed for Phase I by Participant. These improvements will be of standard design and specifications for the purposes which they will serve. The Agency will also provide appropriate landscaping and trees within the public right-of-way. B. Public Utilities Thy Redevelopment Agency, at no cost to Participant, will install or cause to be installed, all necessary public utilities within the public rights-of-way necessary to serve the! 9 �Y Y proposed condominium development. Said !; utilities will include sewer, water, electric, telephone, cable T.Y., gas, 27 fire hydrants and street lights. Participant will be responsible for all connections between the main lines within the public rights-of-way and the condominium units. Participant, or subsequent owners of the units, will be res onsible for an ongoing fees or assessments which are normally required to p Y 9 9 Y q maintain or continue these services. Participant will make appropriate connections between the utility mains within the public rights-of-way and the property line of the Site prior to the completion of the construction of the public streets and sidewalks. i 28 i ��. / ,tachment No. 7 SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE i AGENCY OBLIGATIONS PARTICIPANT OBLIGATIONS Execution of Agreement Delivery of Conceptual Plans Within th rty (30) days following Concurrent with delivery of Agreement to delivery by Participant. Agency. A royal of. Affordabilit Assurance Submittal of Affordability Assurance Program bg Program to City Concurrent A approval of Tentative Concurrent with submittal of Tentative Tract Map. Tract Map. Ava 6�6l of Conce 'tual Plans and Delivery of Certificate of Insurance Tentative Tract a Within fifteen days following N—ormal processing procedures. execution of Agreement by Agency. Commencement of Right-of-Way Ac uisiti, Dedication of Right-of- WayWithin f Mt—eendays following Coranitment made concurrent with the execution of Agreement by Agency. execution;. of Agreement by Agency. Participant must provide evidence of Participant'-; clear title to those lots or . portions of lots being dedicated as public right-of-way. F-oidence of Title Conveyance of Title to Parcel I `;I'i .ow ng the execution of Agreement by Within seven days if er Agency has ,;jency, Agency shall secure evidence of secured evidence of clear title, title to Parcel 1. Participant will convey to Agency, by grant deed or other means acceptable to the Agency, title to Parcel 1. Conveyance of Title to Parcel Z Up—on acquiring tiEle from existing owners or at the time condemnation proceedings are completed. Approval- of Preliminary Plans and Comiletion - of Preliminary Plans and Specifications_ or Phase I 52ecifications for Phase e6 velopmen ery ces to approve within Within sixty ays Tollowing Agency fifteen (15) days after submittal by approval of Conceptual Plans. Participant of completed plans. A roval of Final Plans and Com letion of Final Plans and Specifications ToF ase I cationsor�iase Development ervices oapprove within Within sixty 6 ays following fifteen (15) days after submittal by approval of Preliminary Plans and Participant. Specifications. ApBroval of Final Landscaping Plans for Com letian of Final Landsca ing and Phase I Finishradin Pans for hase I By or b fore framing inspection. Concurrent with completion of Final Plans and Specifications. 2.91 i r • AGENCY OBLIGATIONS PARTICIPANT OBLIGATIONS Tax Exempt F4ah6inq for Phase I Completion of Financial Pro-Forma for Agency to cooperate with Participant in Phase I— seeking to obtain tax exempt financing oncurrent with completion of Final for the project after project financial Plans and Specifications. pro-forma has been cailpl eted. w . Iii nce of Conditional Use Permit for Architect's Certification for Phase I Phase I Participant shall su t ert cation Prior�to commencement of construction to Agency and Mortgagee . immediately and concurrent with tentative map. following approval of Final Plans and Specifications. Com letion ►;-°of . n ineerinci Design for Financing Aroyal 'for Phase I Irublic ImRrovements Approval oF construction Wanting and n, tnirty 30) days following permanent financing by funding. entity approval of Final Plans and shall be obtained by Participant no Specifications. later than one hundred eighty (180) days following Completion of Final Plans and Specifications. Approval of Contractor's Bond Submittal of Evidence of Contractor's Development Services sra 1 approve Bond Contractor's Bond within fifteen (15) r7or to commencement or construction. days after submittal. Commencement of Construction of Condominiums for Phase Wifhin sixty ays following closing of mortgage financing. CAle�tion of Public Improvements and Utilities Prior to completion of construction of condominium project. Return of Public Improvement Bond Upon completion of public mprovements. Completion of. Construction of on om n um ro ec or Phase Winin the construction perloa set forth j in Mortgagee's firm financing commitment but no more than twelve (12) months following commencement of construction. Certificate of Com letion for Phase 1 eve opmen Services shall ssue a Certificate of Completion within thirty (30) days following completion of construction of condominium project. 30 A AGENCY OBLIGATIONS PARTICIPANT OBLIGATIONS Agency Cooeeratfon (Phase II Submittal of Plans for Phase II Agency shall cooperate w. Participant Conceptual p ;;ns for Phase II must be in conneztion with Phase II in the same submitted to Agency no later than twelve {a: fashion as required under Phase I. (12) months following completion of Phase I. t Completion of Phase II Phase II mu e completed no later than eighteen (18) months following submittal ` and approval of conceptual plans and subsequent plans, specifications and } appropriate entitlements. . art 4 {t it- acS' =J i3 ti 4. �+ t . j' Ill • t ' 31 Special Report PLANNING MODE STUDY PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Planning Mode Study Area 1 1.1.1 Location 1 1.1.2 History/Relationship to Central Park 3 1.1.3 Land Use/Zoning 5 1.1.4 Ownership 9 2.0 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES 11 2.1 Land Use Compatibility 11 2.2 Economics 14 2.3 Traffic 20 2.4 Fiscal Impact 20 2.5 Public Facilities 21 2.5.1 Gas and Electricity 21 3 2.5.2 Water 21 2.5.3 Storm Drains 22 2.5.4 Sewers 22 2.5.5 Police and Fire Protection 22 2.5.6 Schools 22 2.5.7 Parks 23 2.6 Environmental Concerns 23 2.6.1 Geotechnica► 23 . 2.6.2 Air Duality 23 2.6.3 Water Quality 25 2.6.4 Noisa 25 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 27 Q: APPENDIX A 29 HUJNTINGTON BE4CH 'CrN RANIA PUNNING DIVISION 11A' •, �ij rt:?'a;il�ill fly,'• lA BACKGROUND 1.1 Planning Mode Study Area 1 This report analyzes four land use alternatives proposed for a 25 gross acre parcel located at the northeastern corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldemlest Street. Originally considered for an addition to Huntington Central Park In Open Space/gConservatlon Element Amendment 80-1, the property was Instead placed in a planning mode, or study area, by the City Council on August 17,1981. Staff was directed to conduct a special study of developmelt alternatives for the site. In cooperation with the Community Services Department, the advance planning staff developed four possible land uses for the planning mode study area: 1. Garden offices with an adjoining restaurant. i 2. Residential. 3. Recreational vehicle camp. 4. Commercial nursery/tree farm. This report includes an analysis of each land use alternative. 1.1.1 Location The planning mode property Is bordered to the north and east by Huntington Central Park, to the west by Goldenwest Street, and to the south by Ellis Avenue (see Figure 1-1). In addition to park areas to the north anz; hoot, the planning mode site Is adjacent to vacant property south of Ellis A.-venue which Is 1 • i•-t• .� 171 uITTI .=to 1 7 3 11• , 1 1 r r 3 1•I � ! � •.•t•. • 1 CF-E ' r1 IYl tt YT•Ywv31 • i 1 + . 1 1 , 1 � • I l irl {• 1t f 11 �l� 1 C F:R •; 1 RED ' �•t 1.1��.1_Jl..l_L1Li`51ti `;zip. so ���- ��1 `�s- ° • hunts ton + Central Park 1 ;! (3279 ac.) CF 1 I• CF-C 1 �-- rill llll l e■ ' Pin n:nai Made(259 - Study k ea Il I i Figure 1-1 �r i "'*4`—"—.1-' ••.. .r. � Y_. .. •ua ......._.,.. --. -...... .• ...........-. __- .�v• .. .... .,:T— ..'.". vM.^.r;..'.-fit.-�'+�'f!•��j,� r�t.i 1 part of a larger area designated for estate residential development (0-4 dulac). Staff is currently preparing a specific plan to implement the estate residential designation. The area west of Goldenwest Street Includes additional Central Park property as well as a 10.1 acre parcel recently redesignated to allow for park-oriented commercial uses. 1.1.2 History/Relationship to Central Park This section will provide a brief history of the planning mode property and Its relationship to Huntington Central Park. planning for the acquisition and development of property for a central city park surrounding Huntington Lake began in the mid - 196019. Over the years, the ultimate size of the park and the nature of uses and activities within the park have been the subject of much Interest and debate. The 1966 Parks, Open Spaces, Schoobi and Recreation Element to. the Master Plan of Land Use called for a central city lake and natural area of 65 acres. The plan further recommended that should the opportunity arise to acquire property at a reasonable rate, the City should purchase additional land. Following a 1969 special bond election to finance the acquisition and development of the City's pack program, an expansion of the central city park to 147 ,acres was proposed to offer a regional facility with multi-use recreational opportunities. In 1970, the City Council authorized the Issuance of $6 million in bonds and hired the firm of Eckbo, Dean, Austin and William, Larwiscape Architects (EDAW), to design Central Park. The EDAW design plan Incorporated both natural and man made features to create a diversity of recreational opportunities. In the early 1970's a city-wide Policy Plan was developed to establish goals and principles to guide the City's growth and development. The plan called for a park of 200-400 acres that had qualities of a regional park by nature of Its large, open natural areas, trees, and lakes, but also a community park to serve the local community's recreational needs. A three phase acquisition program was proposed expanding Huntington Central Park to 450 acres at ultimate development to include the planning mode site as well as additional properties south of Ellis Avenue and west of Edwards Street. Concerns about the coats of acquiring, developing and maintaining such a large park area prompted a financial study in 1973 which Indicated alternative configuration for an expanded park. Park planning efforts were also Influenced by the adoption of the Phase I Land Use Element of the General Plan in December, 1973. The area south of Ellis was designated a planning reserve, Indicating that additional planning was necessary to determine the most desirable land uses for the aria, which had been industrial prior to the deletion of the proposed Route 1 Freeway. The entire area south of Huntington Central Park was analyzed In the March, 1975 amendment to the Land Use Element. The recommended land use plan showed Ellis Avenue realigned 660 feet souGt of its existing alignment and the area north of the realigned highway designated for thi possible future expansion 3 i i l .:-If ' r . z- ��t�1 .j1:;S• •c.ft�[I � ��+W 1 �� } �/ ill J1�� ��i 1I�1 - A m 1 off, •F .. J �.1.L:.L y t g SL 1id t .�, �•.r..�•. .•�.• , 1• I - .. CF-E l �It .; ► } ! I � , ,� � rmrt,.:irtwNMI o ' �.•,. .,.s,..r„ f _i-•L-il.,. ab l.ly.J. I � 11,i if r ' - l i 1 -r �r ��i • PASSIVE RECREATION 40, • r r� � '� r r A I ;�•� r _: � • f NON-REVS _ � `� , _�: L :. ,. • •� .- NUE PRODUCING ACTIVE RECREATION REVENUE-PRODUCING -- t 1 •• r��• •a� ACTIVE RECREATION CF-C _ Lj 7 1 Figure 1-2 4 of Huntington Central Park or other open space uses to buffer the perk from estate density residential to the south. However, at a study session on January 20,1975, the City Council directed that the park boundary be fixed 660 feet north of the existing Ellis Avenue alignment. The area between the park boundary and Ellis was subsequently designated for open space uses, allowing public and private agriculture, recreation facilities, parks, single family homes on one-acre parcels and resource production. The Open Space/Conservation Element adopted In Decsmber, 1976 reflects the park boundary as established by the City Council in 1975. After passage of Proposition e13 In 19789 the City Council directed staff to pursue alternative funding sources to finance development and maintenance of City parks. In response, staff proposed that Central Park be divided Into passive, nonrevenue-producing active and revenue-producing active sections (Selo Figure 1-2). The prospect of developing revenue-producing uses within the park in addition to passive areas made a larger park area more viable, and the City Council agreed to Include the planning mode property and 50 additional acres within the Huntington Central Park planning area for ttee purpose of devdloping a master plan. Ultrasyatems, Inc., completes an economic feasibility, study of revenue-producing uses in May,1981. The study explored several land use alternatives and recommended implementation of a mix of income generating uses for Central Park Including, among others, a hotel and convention facility, an 18-hole gait course, a restaurant, snack concession, a ; YMCA facility and a 200-space recreational vehicle park located on the 25-acre planning mode property. In December, 1980, the City Council considered Open Space/Conservation Element Amendment 80-1, which recomonded a 75-acre expansion of Centriol Park to accummodate the revenue producing uses suggested In the Ultrasyatems, Inc. study. Rejecting the inclusion of a hotel/convention center or golf course in Central Park, the City Council approved a more passive-oriented development plan (see Figure 1-3) and voted to expand the park by only 30 acres, placing the site at the northeast corner of Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avonue !n a planning mode for six months for further staff evaluation. This 25-acre site is the subject of t;:la report. 1.1.3 Land Use and Zoning The property Is dominates; by the farming facllltle£ of Ocean View Mushroom Growers, Inc., one of the last remaining agricultural operations In the City. A small auto/truck repair shop, a single family home and a farm labor camp are located on Elba Avenue, along with threw active oil wells and two tank enclosures. The 25-acre site slopes gradually from an elevation of 60 feet at Ellis Avenue to 40 feet at the northern boundary. Along the eastern edge of the property, the land drops off ste4ply Into Sully Miller Lake (gee Figure 1-4). Sully Miller Lake, which Iles within tha boundaries of Central Park, was formed after extensive sand and gravel excavation left an open pit that eventually filled with water. Only n portion of the lake Is waterfilled, leaving steep banks from 40 to 60 feet above the waterline. The existence of both Sully Miller Lake and Central Park adjacent to the planning made site create a unique setting and contribute highly to the development potential of the site. 5 • r 1 a' .n� IRS' _ .>;;j t '��'1 ` '�i►•f • a ��� � � tYt•3� x ., :�� 1. `�: ^�, � .• _1 •� c, •� 1 1 � .. a.►• �• �• r� r.� .. 10 ry �2L ~•~ •«.ai. � ,• i�'� Lr �� 1I ��'Y w •N�sue+ SI r"` ••• ~~i��1"Trr' .may♦��'1 �t�� {yam' ~�-r++'�`�"'.�..M�t'�. � •+ �•'R � •• �-n. OR it An 1 , �r1{rJ1■{1r.4C TTy.�'yh►,;�a�FKl��' I �.]�� . • �1���' f� ■ 1 Planning 1 Mode 1 1 .Y f: r, SULLYz MILLER ^LAKE fir; 450 Ix j so , ate t ELLtS TOPOGRAPHY Figure 1-Q 7 NO Currently designated for open spice usu In the City's Land Use Element and for plonned open space development in the City's Open Space/Conservation Element, the site Is zoned predominnntly RA-O-CD, Residential Agriculturol combined with an oil and civic district auffix (see Figure 1-5). The RA zono In transitional In nature Indicating that the property to to be rezoned to conform with the Land Use Element prior to development. The 1.69 acre portion at the northeast corner of Ellis and Goldenwest Street is zoned MI-CD (Light Industrial •Civic District). 1.1.4 Ownership Ocean View Mushroom Gruwers, Inc. owns approximately 20 acres e! the 23.75 net acre planning mr;de site (see Figure 1-6). The remaining aerengR. Is divided among numerous property owners, the largest of which includes hisbell3radley - 1.89 acres, James Hudson - 1.03 acres, and Richrd Pariseau - .7.6 acre. i i i i 1 8 YA./u+•.f-.R,fRI LLn.....i7 a..wa-ws. . ...r• r u �r...�.�..-.. ` ... .....rry ..'.i.. ........ ..... -.. .`.�._..... ......�....w..w�,r.w r..�M.aw..n1.1.•M'ar/..r"w 1 I . r kt-w--el F1 I R I nl R Ri Mal Rj-CD Rl-cD Rl "I Rl RI I UR I ISE I Rl RI -Cc -At—) RI Rl No .w 41 J. co mi-co ar Y, 41 RI 9 I.CF-E It$ U I a 1;WN I A-CDv' 1 le III ma CF-R fill R TIR 1 .10 Fi4'T.14 RI RI f1l RI RI - C F R: N11-c Rl RI loll MI-CD Rl Itt 4`10 L---- R W. Hunti i glon RI RI RI Rl Centro I Park (327c 1.a c.) NZ... CF-R CF-R MI-( Ml-CD --- co RA-0-CD ml A-0-C A-0-CD CF-C CD U-0-M LU-0-cc L U-0 LU 0 Mt-CD ml 'kits a -CD 10 col Planning Made Mt -CD Study irea RA-CO U 0 co RA_0-01 1AI.O.CD (25-T-10c.) U-0 cc RA 0- Figure 1-5 V 1 ^ R �. 41 u h Y1 ' 7 I ` ... �'1"r. .TT► NNW n AJ W Vq J -�- _• •ni••i rr-r. E l S i �I I - OCEAN VIEW MUSHROOM GROWERS, INC. q - RICHARD PARISEAU g - MABEL BRAOLEY • - JA4E5 HUOSON i - SMALL LOT OWNERS OWNERSHIP Figure 1-6 I EM o i lO PF-' 2.0 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES i 2.1 Land Use Compatibility i A. Gorden Offices/Restaurant 1 The first land use alternative considered for the planning mode alto Is a garden office complex with an adjoining restaurant. A hypothetical development utilizing the entire 25-acre site could include almost 175,000 square feet of office apace with a 6,000 square foot restaurant. �I Although generally regarded as a low intensity use, garden offices with a i 35-foot height limit may pose land use compatibility problems with adjacent park uses and future estate residential development. Through i landscaping and proper design, a garden office complex could be visually j Integrated Into the largely low intensive land uses surrounding the i pluming mode site. However, this alternative Is projected to generate the highest. traffic volume (see Section 2.4) of any of the land uses considered for the site. j The inherent Increase In traffic generc:ion and related noise may detract 1. from the rural, equestrian-oriented atmosphere of Cential Park and planned estate residential development to the south. Development of garden offices with an adjoining restaurant would require both a General Plan amendment redesignating the planning mode property ' from open space zo a commercial designation and a zone change. An �. appropriate zoning district would be R-51 office professions. B. Residential Estate residential development on the 25-acre planning mode site would allow for development of up to 71 homes (3 du/ac), according to the projected density for the Ellie-Goldenwest Specific Plan area. For purposes of discussion, this section will also consider lik3 possibility of low and medlum density residential development. on the planning mode property. II t Staff is currently developing the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan for some 290 acres to the south and southwest of the planning mode site featuring estate residential development within a rural, equestrian-oriented environment (see Figure 1-7). Similar development on the planning mode property would serve as a natural extension of the specific plan area, ensuring land use compatibility with adjacent residential and park uses. This type of development could also serve to enhance the Ellis-Goldenwest area by preserving the continuity of low Intensive, equestrian oriented development established by Central Park and planned equestrian estates to the south. The topography of the 290 acres within the Ellis-Goldenwest specific plan area is unique to the City and features significant variations in elope and terrain to create a rural atmosphere. Strict development standards, combined with low intensive estate residential development, will help to minimize grading and protect the area's topographic features. The 25-acre planning mode site, however, is relatively flat, varying only 20 feet in elevation from north to south and could allow for more Intensive residential development without any significant land alteration. A low density planned residential development of 148 units (6.24 dv/ac), properly landscaped and buffered, would present no land use compatibility concerns with any of the surrounding uses and would enable the builder to bring the purchase price of lndividual units In line with a wider range of Incomes. A medium density development of 285 units (12 du/ac) would accomplish the same goal but could pose Incompatibility problems with the largely low intensive uses surrounding the site. With adequate setbacke, buffering and landscape screening, however, staff feels that a medium density residential development on the planning mode site could be properly designed to be visually Integrated with the adjacent estate and Central Park. Relitively low traffic generation projections (see Section 2.4) for all three residential densities would not significantly Impact the area's rural atn:,isphere. Residential development on the planning mode site would require a General Plan amendment redesignating the property from open space to residential. Appropriate zoning for a low or medium density residential development would be R1-PD and R2-PD, respectively. Estate residential development would likely be implemented as an extension of the Ellis-Goldenwest specific Plan. C. Recreation Vehicle Park The 25-acre planning mode property, If used for a recreational vehicle camping park, could accommodate approximately 580 campsites. Conceptual plans show the property terraced down to the shore of Sully Miller Lake, which would be landscaped and offer recreational flnhing opportunities. Terracing of the RV park development to the lakeshore would help to visually integrate this land use with surrounding recreational uses in Central Park. Should this alternative be selected for the site, plans are to 12 ';• � = ''- `•� �;�. %�/ OPEN SPACE • ! s •_-�' LOW DENSITY - _ ! : V , f.J RESIDENTIAL40 gins a WV ESTATE (0.2) RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE (0-4) RESIDENTIAL t+�• i — _ ,:a 's-as ss s as a as v iIR --ice- _ 7- __== PLANNED CON;MUNITY RESOURCE MEDIUM DENSITY PRODUCTION RESIDENTIAL •••!•! Plann:ng Mode Study Area mw ra HWINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIN PLANNING DIVISION _ i• Ellis-Gol denwest Specific Plan Figure I-7 3'� landscape and renovate Sully Miller Lake which would serve not only as an attraction for campers but would also create a new recreational and fishing area for City residents. Proper design of an RV camping facility on the planning mode property would be an Important factor In the project's ability to successfully attract a significant occupancy rate. Noise impacts (see Section 2.6.4) from traffic along Goldenwest Street and tits nearby police firing range may be mitigated through Incorporating adequate setbacks, berming, Intensified landscaping or other buffering te.hniques in the overall design and layout of the project. These measures would also serve to allow development of the planned estate residential south of Ellis Avenue without any significant adverse impacts from recreational uses of this type. The low traffic volume generated by this use would not significantly impact the area's circulation system. Tits planning made property, developed as an RV facility, would require a zone change to either ROS (Recreational Open Space) or a designation of CF-R (Recreational-Community Facilities) by the Director of DeVelopment Services and an amendm-3nt to the Open Space/Conservation Element from the present open space development designation to recreation. D. Nursery/Tree Farm The final land use analyzed for the planning mode site is a commercial nursery combined with a tree farm. A hypothetical development devised by staff projects approximately one third (eight acres) of the site would be utilized as a commercial nursery consisting primarily of open space fa- plant distribution, a small sales office and greenhouses. The wholesale tree farm area would comprise the remaining 16 acres. Whether the trerse are grown on site or stored In containers, no permanent structures wavid be necessary in the tree farm area. This alternative would likely serve as trdnsltianal land use. If properly designed, a nursery/tree farm would blend well with the surrounding park and the planned estate residential development to the f south. Trees and other plant life associated with this land use would accent the park's own vegetation and highlight the rural quality of the estate development. Also, the relatively low traffic volume generated (see Section 2.4) and the passive nature of this use precludo any appreciable rise in air pollutant or nolse levels. This combined use Is ronsistent with the present open space development designation and zoning an the site with the except-2n of the 1.89 acre northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street -which Is zoned MI-CO. i 2.2 Economics I A. Garden Offices/Restaurant A recent inventory conducted by the Huntington Beach Company shows that, at present, the City has over one million square feet of office, apace In freestanding buildings. Almost one-thiro of this space Is occupied by medlc9l-dental tenants located around the two major hospitals In central Huntington Beach. Many neighborhood shopping centers and Industrial buildings In the City alco feature additional office space for tenants. 14 Thirteen office developments are currently under construction and upon completion will add another 379,000 square feet to the City's office space Inventory. Generally located in two areas - alo:-,g Beach Boulevard between Talbert and Adams Avenues and in the vicinity of Bolas Chica Street and Warner Avenue, these buildings range in size from 11,000 to 63,000 square feet of space. Additionally, four major office developmenta are in the planning stages which will more than double the City's current supply of office space. These projects include: 1. One Pacific Plaza - located at the intersection of the San Diego Freeway and Beach Boulevard. This project proposes a total of 196,O00 square feet of space to be located in two nix-story and one twelve-story buildings. The first six-story building has recently been completed and is about one third leased. 2. Lindbor9-Dahl Office Condos - located at the intersection of Magnolia Street and the San Diego Freeway, this project proposes 85,000 square feet of condominium space in two and three-story buildings. 3. Moia High Rise Towers - located at the southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue, this development proposes two 17-story office towers with a total of 520,000 square feat of space. 4. McDonnel Douglas - McDonnei Douglas Realty has received preliminary approval from the City for a one-million square toot industrial-office, mixed use de,.elopment to be located at the northwest corner of Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue. The development proposes 635,000 square feet of office space to be constructed over a ten-year period. The coastal planning staff is currently developing specific plans for the downtown +area that propose several additional areas for mixed office/commercial use. If 50 percent of the allocated space in these i mixed use areas develop as offices, over two million square feet of office space In the City would become available. County-wider trends In office space construction show a dramatic jump since 1977. With over two million square feet of now office space i currently under construction, the total stock of competitive office space in Orange County will soon reach nearly 20 million square feet according to n recently published real estate analysis by Coldwell Banker. There are five major areas within the county that create the bulk of the Orange County office space market. Almost one-third of the county's total offloo space Is located in the John Wayne Airport area. Other major concentrations of county office space are located in the cities of Santa Ana, Anaheim and Orange. Additionally, Newport Center In Newport Beach has long been a site for firms desiring a prestige location and commands one of the highest rental rates in the county. As a whole, the county experienced rising vacancy rates in office development in 1979 and 1980, according to Caldwell Banker. ` I � .I 1 Caldwell Banker, Orange County 1981-The Commercial Real Estate Market. February, 1981. i 1.S V I The planning mode site would provide a high quality environmental setting for a arden office complex and would have direct access via the San Diego ?405) Freeway. However, the location of the planning mode site Is some distance from the two major areas of office concentration In the City. This may present difficulties in successfully attracting propsective tenants to an area not already established for c ffice development. Also, with thirteen office projects under construction, four major office developments planned In the near future, and existing development having vacant space available, the City's demand for additional office space appears to be minimal at the present time. The vacancy rate of existing office space In Huntington Beach is estimated to be close to ten percent. This high rats can be partially attributed to several recently completed office buildings that have been unable to attract a sufficient number of tenants. B. Residential The Ellis-Go ldenwest Specific Plan area of 290 acres developed at an average of three dwelling units per acre will allow for up to 870 estate-type homes. Should Ghe planning mode site be built at the some density, an additional 71 humes could be built on the 25-acre site. ; The 290 acran south of Ellis Avenue appear to provide sufficient acreage for equestrian-oriented estate residential development in the City. Located adjacent to Central Park, Individual units developed at an estate density will likely comprise some of the most expensive homes in Huntingtor Beach. Additional estate development on the 25-acre planning mode site, however, would be consistent with the diversified housing policies set forth in the General Plan. The Housing Element of the General P16i Includes the following pulicies to guide residential development in the City: 1. Provide.housing opportunity for all segments of the population; 2. Provide a variety of housing types In all areas of the City; 3. Encourage development of neighborhoods that are available and attractive to diverse economic groups; 4. Encourage the dispersal of housing types within Huntington Beach. A low or medium density planned residential development on the 25-acre site may be more in ccnformance with the General Plan guidelines of providing neighborhoods with a variety of hauiing V pea atractive to Diverse economic groups. A low density development of 148 units (rthe 4 du/ac) or a medium density development of 285 units (12 du/sc) ane planning mode property would not only provide more housing units for City but would allow the Wider to sell Individual units at lower costo � buyers. 16 C. Recreational Vehicle Park An RV camping park was one of many revenue-producing uses analyzed as part of the Ultrasystems, Inc., economic feasibi!lty study of Central Park completed in April, 1981. The data and conclusions from this study provide some useful general Information regarding demand for recreation and commercial uses for the study area. The Ultrasystems, Inc. study projects that a high quality, attractively landscaped RV facility could be supported in Central Park due to Increasing Orange County tourist travel and a strong demand for RV campsites. The study also predicts that an RV facility, located In a park environment, could command a nightly fee of $10-$15. The vast majority i of existing RV parks within a 15-mile radius of Central Park are located In Anaheim and maintain annual occupancy rates ranging from 70-90 percent with typical nightly fees of between $6-$15. These parks are privately operated and can attribute their high occupancy rates to their close proximity to Disneyland. Should the entire 25-acre planning mode alto be developed as a RV facility, about 560 spaces could be constructed. While this facility may attract significant patronage during the summer, it may be too large to achieve a significant occupancy the remainder of the year. One of the most Important Issues to consider In analyzing the RV campsite alternative involves the cost to the City, and its taxpayers, of acquiring, developing, operating and maintaining the facility. Should the site be developed as a recreation area, preliminary plans envision the property as being included within the Central Park boundaries. As a City owned and operated facility, state and federal grant funding sources, if available, could be used to offset a portion of the land acgidaltIon and development costs. An Independent appraisal has not been conducted to determine the coat of acquiring the planning mode property by the City. Staff, following consultation with a real estate firm and land developers in the area, has estimated the City could purchase the 25 acre site for between $5 and $6 million dollars. Development and Infrastructure costs for a 580 - space RV camping facility were projected In the Ultrasystems, Inc. study to be 2 900 800. Staff, through consultation with Ultrasystems, Inc., has estimated that operating and maintenance costs for a 580-space RV facility over ten years would be $2,442,092. Additlonally, general government and administrative costs incurred by the City for this land use on the planning mode property are projected to amount to $635,139. Total coats, then, for land acquisition, development, Infrastructure, operation, general government and administration for the RV camping alternative located on the planning mode site would be between $10,342,892 and $11,342,E192 over ten years depending on land acquisition costs. The Community Services Department has estimated that the initial costs for land, development and Infrastructure for a 580-apace RV facility on the planning mode site could be financed through a number of sources Including grants, !park acquisition and development funds, the floating of a general revenue bond and, possibly, the sale of three undeveloped 17 I i neighborhood park sites - Wieder, Irby slid Terry. The State has approved a $609,000 mntching grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to be used by the City for developing an RV facility. The grant money can only be used toward land acquisition costs and will not be nvpilnble to the City after September 30, 1982. The City's pork acquisition and development fund, as of August 1982, totals $735,000. Community Services also estimates that the sale of three undeveloped neighborhood park sites, subject to City Council approval, could bring In an additional $4.9 million toward land acquisition and development of a RV facility. However, some of these funds may be committed to acquiring several privNtely owned small lots located west of Goldenwest Street, east of Edwards Street, north of Ellis Avenue and south of the existing park boundary., This area was recently redesignated in Open Space/Conservation Element Admendment 81-1 to allow for expansion of Central Park, and a private real estate consultant completed an appraisal of the property for the City In January, 1982. Fair market value for the property was estimated to be $2,752,500. As a C'ty developed and operated facility, staff has estimated the Initial land and development costs of $7.9 to $8.9 million (not Including ongoing operation and general government expenses) could be financed through the sale of three neighborhood park altos, Park Acquisition and Development Funds, the Land and Plater Conservation Grant, with the balance being paid by floating a $5 million revenue bond. This method may, however, require reordered priorities for park development In the City, since it would require a mujor commitment of park funds toward development of the RV camping alternative. Staff, through consultation with Ultrasystems, Inc., has estimated that an attractively designed facility in Central Park could achieve a 80% occupancy rate during summer months with a fee of $15 per space. Non-summer weekends are projected to achieve 40% occupancy rate at $12.50 per space, and non-summer weekdgys are projected to achieve a 20% occupancy rate at $7.50 per space.z Maintaining this occupancy rate in a 580-speco facility, however, would likely depend upon + completion of the planned Improvements to the Central Park area including the sports fled complex and equestrian center as additional attractions iur prospective vacationers., Assuming the projected annual occupancy rates and nighty fees, a 580-space park would generate an estimated $12,619,723 In nightly fees over tan years. When compared to the $10,3429892 to $11,342,092 In City incurred costs required to develop, operate and maintain a RV facility, however, this alternative would not begin to pay for Itself until after 1991. Once the initial land, development and infrastructure coats are paid off, the development would create an estimated positive cash flow of at least $1 million annually In today's dollars. 2 if State Land and Water Conservation Grant funds are used towards land j acquisition for an RV facility, the nightly fees charged may be subject to State regulation. (Department of Interior Grants-and Aid Manual, Section 685.24©) 18 Should the City lease the land to a RV operator/developer, the City would be responsible only for land, generat government and administrative costs of $5.6 to $6.6 million. These costs, however, would require a major financial commitment for the City and may cE use a reprioritization of park development. nevelopment, Infrastructure, operation and facility maintenance costs would be paid by the operator. Under such an arrangement, the City would receive a yearly lease fee estimated by Ultrasystems, inc. to be fifteen percent of the total revenue collected in nightly fees. As a privately operated facility, staff assurned a higher annual occupancy rate due to available nationwide advertising. Based on these projections, the City would receive $2,230,256 over ten years, or fifteen percent of $14,868,392, When compared to $5.6 to $6.6 million in land, government and administrative costs Incurred by the City under lease arrangement, the minimal amount of estimated revenue return creates a highly negative cash flow for the City of $3.4 to $4.4 million over ten years. The location of the planning mode site Is over one mile from the beach - the recreational resource with the largest aw-action for Huntington Beach tourists and vacationers alike. Although no RV camping Is presently allowed on the beach in the summer, approximately 150 spaces are available at the City-operated Sunset Vista Camper Facility located an Pacific Coast Highway at Lake Street from September 15 thrn::yh May 31. As a condition for the State Department of Parks and Recreation's planned Improvements of recreational fscilitics at Huntington State Beach, the California Coastal Commissirn Is requiring the State to provide at least 150 or more R%' spaces located at either Huntington State Beach or Balsa Chicc State Beach within two years. These spaces will be available "ur fear-round use. in addition, the State Department of Parks and Recreation began a new program in August, 1982, which allocates 50 spaces for in route overnight RV camping at both Huntington State and Dolsa Chico State Beaches. Campers pay $5 per night and are required to check In after 0:00p.m. and leave by 9:DDa.m. The RV spaces made available under this program may be used to satisfy a portion of the spaces required by the Coastal Commission and are available on a year-round basis. The availability o' RV campsites on the beach will certainly detract somewhat from the desirability of inland RV camping on the planning mode property. The City of Long Beach also has plans to provide a ! 30-acre RV racility in El Dorado Park in the near future which would provide additional competition for a Huntington Beach campsite. The many amenities of Huntington Central Park may, however, help in making the planning mode site into a popular camping area. Additionally, the future development of Bolsa Chicn Linear Park (though not projected to be completed for 20 years) will eventually provide trails from Central Park to Bolsa Chico State Beach and would add to the location's desirability for vacation camping. D. Nursery Tree Farm i Consultation with several tree farm and nursery owners provided useful Information concerning the economic feasibility and suitability of th. planning mode site for nursery/tree farm development. The nursery owners estimated an acceptable land cost for an eight acre nursery at between $1.2 - $1.6 million and between $.24 - $1.3 million for a 16-acre tree form. The combined nursery/tree farm estimates range from $1.4 - $2..9 million. 19 1 Comparison of the estimated $5 to $6 million for acquiring the planning mode site with the nursery owner3' estimate shows n correlation between titre owners' high estimate and the Ci�y's lowest appraised estimate. While marketability of the planning made area as a nursery/tree farm is feasible, finding a buyer may be difficult. Additionally, a 40-acre nursery/tree farm is currently operating in close vicinity to the site and may prove to be highly competitive with any future nursery development in the area. 2.3 Traffic The Traffic: Section of the Public Works Department estimates that a 25-acre garden office complex with a restaurant would generate approximately 4,800 daily vehicle trips. Extensive street modification would be required to handle this increase In traffic volume including signal and controller modifications as wall as the widening and strengthening of the intersection approaches at Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. These improvements and the increase In traffic volume general ed by garden offices along Goldenwest Street may detract from the rural, equestrian-oriented atmosphere of neic hhoring Central Park and planned estate residential to the south. The projected amount of tra',fic volume generated by the residential alternatives considered Is not expected to significantly impact the present arterial system serving the area. The developer of the property would, however, be "required to upgrade portions of Ellis Avenue including Installation i of curbing and gutters. Primary access would be off Goldenwest Street. The RV park and nursery/tree farm are projected to generate the lowest traffic volume of the land uses analyzed for the planning mode property. The only anticipated traffic constraint Is the narrow width of Ellis Avenue which may be Insufficient to allow nursery access for lerge trucks. Goldenwest Street, however, is sufficiently wide for large vehic.'a access and provides a direct link to the San Diego (405) Freeway. The relatively small Increase in traffic volume associated with these uses would help preserve the rural atmosphere of Central Park and the planned residential estate development. Projected future traffic generated by the proposed land use alternatives ore as follows: Land Use Alternative Traffic Generation � 1) Gardr:n Of 4,800 trips/day � 2) Estate Residential 036 trips/day 3) Low Density Residential 1,302 trips/day 4) Medium Density Residential 2,198 trips/day 5) RV Park 440 trips/day 6) Nursery/Tree Farm 530 trips/day 2.4 Fiscal impact The City fiscal impact model projects that over a ten year period, 1982-1992, a garden office complex (with an adjoining restaurant) located on the planning made site would create a negative cash flora for the City of $3789574. High administrative, fire, police nr,d street maintenance costs are assumed to for outweigh any return revenue to the City generated by the development. The j alternative would generate lithe in the area of sales tex revenue. 20 All of tha residential alternatives considered for the planning mode property are projected to generate a revenue surplus. Primarily through property taxes, estate residential development of 71 units would produce $106,421 in City revenue over ten years. A low density development of 140 units Is projected to generate $490495 and a medium density development of 205 units is expected to create a positive cash flow of $126,251. The RV camping alternative, as a City developed and opeirated facility, would cost the City an estimated $10,342,892 to $11,342,892 In land acquisition, development, infrastructure, general government and administrative costs ova: ten years. Projected nightly fees total $12.6 million over the same: time period, creating a positive cash flow of $1,257,108 to $2,257,108. As a leased operation, the RV campsite alternative Is projected to generate only $2.2 million over ten years with total costs estimated at $5.6 to $6.6 million, creating a negative cash flow of $3.4 to $4.4 million over the development's initial decade of operation. The nursery/tree farm al';;ernative Is projected to have a highly negative cash revenue ratio. The prircipal revenue sources, property and sales tax, are low due to the few structures required and the largely wholesale nature of this use. Total costa art projected to outrun total revenue by a margin of 7 to 1, or a $1,529,088 negative cash flow. 2.5 Public Facilities 2.5.1 Gas and Electricity Natural gas service le provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Extension of the existing A" gas line along Ellis Avenue will adequately service development under all four land use alternatives. The Gas Company notes, however, that supply may be affected by the overall nvallablEty of natural gas j and Mate and federal regulatory policies. Electrical service, provided by the Edison Company, can be adequately provided via distribution lines in the vicinity of the planning mode property. The Edison Company notes that the total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually, and If plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities continue: being delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer loads during peak demand purlods could become marginal by the (: mid-1980's. The City would be responsible for gas and electrical Installation costs should an R.V. facility be constructed on the planning mode site; under the other iand uses considered for the planning mode property there facilities ! would be privately developed. 2.5.2 Water The existing water main Wong Goldenwest Street, one of the oldest in the City, is in need of upgrading and has serious p,essury problems. Extension of a 1211 wafer main along Ellis Avenue from Gothard Street would be required prior to the development of the planning mode property and would ensure adequate ; water supplies for any of the land ure alternat' i s considered. ' 21 4 ter- - The costs for extending the water main would be incurred by the City if the F .V. campsite alternative is developed; Infrastructure costs for the other land uses considered would be paid by private developers. 2.5.3 Storm Drainage The 25-acre planning mode site, developed under any of the four land use alternatives, would not present any significant difficulties In providing adequate storm drainage. Depending on the final development and grading plans, the northern section of the property could tie Into the existing 36" storm drain serving Huntington Central Park. The southern portion of the property could tie Into the existing library storm drain or could be piped through a desiltation basin Into the adjacent Sully Miller L sake. 2.5.4 Sewers In order to accommodate the sewerage demand for the development alternatives considered for the planning mode property, a developer would be required to install a 10" sewer line alongside the existing @" line in Goldenwest Street. Developed as an R.V. campsite, however, the City would be responsible for sower installation costs. 2.5.5 Police and Fire Protection Police service for the area of concern is provided by the City of Huntington Beach, which operates from one central facility located at` Main Street and Yorktown Avenue. Utilizing the national average of 2.0 officera per 11000 population, the alternatives for this area would require the following additional officers: Land Use Additional Alternative Officers 1) Garden Offices 1- Officer 2) Residential 0-2 Officer 3) R.V. Camping Facility 0-1 Officer 4) Nursery/Tree Farm 0- Officer Source: Huntington Beach Police Department ' Fire protection for the area of concern is provided by the Gothard Station l xcated an Ellis Avenue on the west side of Cothard Street. The area of concern lies within the five minute response are-, of the station. 2.5.6 Schcols The area of concern Is served by Mesa View Elementary School and Ocean View High School. Neither garden offices, a recreational vehlclo park nor a nursery/tree farm would generate any school age children. Of the residential alternatives considered, both estate and low density developments can be expected to each generate 17 elementary school students and 10 high school students. A medium density development can be expected to generate 11 elementary school students and 6 high school students. Both Mesa View School and Ocean View High School Indicate that there would be no problem in accommodat;ng the few additional students. 22 I i I I i 2.5.7 Parks The 1977 Parks Analysis indicates that the supply of neighborhood park space in the vicinity of the study area Is greater than the demand. Developed under any of the residential alternatives considered, the planning mode property would have an abundance of park space In the adjacent Central Park and planned Bolso Chica Linear Park. I' 2.6 Environmental Concerns 2.6.1 Geotechnical Preliminary research indicates the presence of the Bolsa-Fairview Fault slicing across the! southern end of the planning mode property (see Figure 2-1). The Balsa-Fairview Fault is one of the three known faults in Huntington Beach considered to be geologically active: and subject to possible future surface rupture. This potential Is considered to be greater in the northern portion of the City, and the planning mode site Is not located within the A:4uist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Special Study Zone. A number of source:, also Indicate that subsidence may be a potential problem In the Central Park area. Examples of this can be found at the current heliport site and a blocked drainage pipe running from Talbert Avenue to Sully Miller Lake. The Implication of this information is that detailed soils and geology studies should be undertaken before any new building construatlon is Initiated on the planning mode property. 2.6.2 Air Ouality All five land use alternatives would adversely impact air quality within the I South Coast region. The primary air emissions generated Include carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, particulates and sulfur oxides from mobile and stationary sources. Automobile and truck traffic produce more of the pollutants with a small portion attributable to local heating. The following table summarizes the air emissions generated by the five land use alternatives: Tons of Emission Source Emission/Day a 1) Garden Offices/Restaurant C Mobile .67 Stationary Ne 1. TOTAL .67 I: 2) Estate Residential Mobile .16 Stationary Neal• TOTAL .16 3) Low Density Residential Mobile .24 Stationary Negl. TOTAL .24 23 3 � � I I � � I° I.I.�� I��_: 1•:� .1.i lT�_I�I.l1 I � I i ��I` _ •�; � ( ;'�~�� ► ��� IJAIrLi. l.��. � ;1,1I,1(.1_IJ I;!_�j_U-II.I 1!��i711. I! � �,I= i ,,.. • ar .J.J�_I�.l. n: ri"'� �r_..t�t�l '_ tit t ,.•, ...•. . _' FLL J, II[ = I .4., TALOERT -� ' • CF-C us ow r • • a • • of I I ! � I • ft'go Ative Location t Source: bQen Space Element Fault lines and Geologic Conditions Figure 2-1 err �- •�� ,.� 24 • , `{- =y y I i 4) Medium Denaty Residential Mobile .40 Stationary Negl• TOTAL .40 5) Recreational Vehicle Park Mobile .06 ! Stationary Negl• i TOTAL .06 6) Nursery/Tree Farm Mobile .07 Stationary Negl. TOTAL .07 fSource; Huntington Beach Planning Division, 1982. 2.6.3 Water Quality Lakes such as Sully Miller Lake, which are maintained primarily by the ground water table, usually have good water quality and low levels of euthrophication. However, like all lakes they are sensttiva to excessive Inputs from the watershed. Evidence Indicates that Sully Miller Lake is presently subject to excessive nutrient loading. The primary source of these nutrients appears to be the existing mushroom farm which uses large quantities of horse manure visible within the lake'3 drainage area. Consequently, all the alternatives considered for the planning mode site would i likely result In improving the water quality of Sully Miller Lake over the property's present use. Development of the site as a RV perk would result in complete landscaping and renovation of the lake Into a recreational fishing i area. Equestrian-oriented estate development, however, could pose a concern if horse facilities are not well maintained. I 2.6.4 Noise The planning mode site is exposed to exterior noise levels of Ldn 65 and Ldn 70 along Goldenwest Street. These noise levels are within acceptable levels (Ldn 80) for commercial development. Residential development, however, would be subjected to noise levels In excess of the normally acceptable level for residential areas. ` Located to the northeast of the planning mode site is a police firing range which is open to the general public. The conceptual master plan for Huntington Central Park shows expansion of the present shooting range facility to include a gun shop. 25 1 A noise assessment was conducted for Huntington Central Park In March, 1982 by J. J. Van Houton and Associates, Inc. The study determined that the peak noise level generated by the activity at the gun range to be about 62 to L6 db(A) at the nearest portion of the planning mode property. This may have a significant impact on development of the residential or RV camping facility alternatives If activity occurs at the gun range during the evening or early morning hours. Presently, the range Is open for the general public seven days a week from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. except on Thursdays which allows shooting from noon to 8:00 p.m. Design of both the RV facility and the residential alternatives to reduce the noise from vehicular traffic and gun range activities may require special mitigation measures such as extra setbacks, berming, intensified landscaping, additional insulation or other buffering techniques. Additionally, the City may want to consider restricting the operating hour.; and providing for sound insulation of the gun range. I i I I 26 1 • 1 I 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION With most office developments in the City having vacant space available, and with several major office projects planned or under construction, the demand for an additional office complex located an the planning made property is minimal at the present time. In addition, the draft version of the Downtown Specific Plan allocates several million square feet for potential office uses. Promoting office development on the planning made property may deter prospective tenants from locating In thn downtown area. A nursery/tree farm on the planning made site would not reflect the development potential or value of the property. This land use alternative is ' projected to have n highly negative cash flow for the City and would be In '' direct competition with a 40-acre nursery/tree farm nearby. The lack of significant topographic features on the planning mode site would i allow for low or medium density residential development without any significant land alteration. Adequate buffering, landscaping and setbacks would enable such a development to be compatibly integrated with surrounding land rises while providing additional housing units in Huntington Beach. Medium f density residential development would also serve to deversify the housing type and density and provide relatively more affordable housing in the Ellis-Goldenweat area which Is currently being planned largely for estate residential development. Office, residential or nursery/tree farm development on tine planning made site. however, would Iarguly isolate Sully Miller Lake from the rest of Central Park and may preclude renovation of the lake into a useable recreation area. Staff recommends that the 25•acre planning mode site bis Included within the Huntington Central Park boundaries and be used for puhllc recreational uses. Adding the area would create a more uniform boundary for Um park and would allow Increased access and development possibilities for the adjac-tit Sully Miller Lake. 27 If the entire s►.,e were developed as an RV camping facility, the Community Services Department has estimated that about 580-600 spaces could be constructed. The few RV parks in the United States that offer a campground close to the size of the facility proposed for the planning mode site are all located near major recreation, vacation, or amusement centers that draw patronage on a nationwide basis. Locations of such RV parks include Anaheim (near -Disneyland), San Diego's Mission Bay, Lake Perris, Las Vegas, Reno and Death Valley National Monument.3 While Huntington Central Park, at full development, will offer a variety of recreation amenities, staff feels the area lacks the special attraction required to continuously support such a large facility. Additionally, the sales of recreational vehicles are largely tied to the availability and price of gasoline and further complicates projecting the future demand for RV campsites. Following the 1973 all embargo, sales of RVs were down almost 30 percent the ' following year.4 Therefore, staff recommends developing an RV facility on the site using a phased approach. By initially developing a facility of about 200 to 230 spaces using only a portion of the site, the City can better motiltor the project's revenue-generating potential and assess whether an expanded RV facility would be cost effective In the long term. After the initial phase, an assessment should be made whether to expand the RV facility or to develop an altrerretive recreational use on the remainder of the site. In addition to the RV facility, the site could possibly accommodate additional revenue-generating recreatlo.-lal uses which would serve area residents rather than primarily out-of-to..-n vacationers. Staff additionally recommends that the initial phase of the RV facility be developed at the southern portion of the planning mode property near the Intersection of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. This would enable the City to compatibly integrate any additional recreational uses on the northern portion of the site with Central Park parking facilities along the south side of Talbert. The many planned amenities for Central Park, which Include an equestrian center, a sports field complex, a YMCA, and an expanded gun range, all add to the location's desirability for RV camping. The City may additionally went to consider establishing a shuttle bus service for RV campers to provide easy access to the beach, the largest recreational attraction in the City. The development of *he planning mode property for revenue-generating recreational uses, with high land acquisition and development costs, will take years before the City can expect any revenue return. These costs, however, must be balanced with the projected long-term benefits of an expanded Central Park for present and future residents of Huntington Beach. 3 American Automobile Association Campbook, 1982 Edition. Mechanix Illustrated, January, 1975, pg. 21. 28 4 MAIM s . APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PLANNING MODE STUDY In cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., the computerized fiscal impact methodology was used to analyze the proposed land use alternatives for the planning mode property. The table an the following page indicates the cumulative fiscal implications of each land use r over the next ten yearn. 1 i . M i • ' { r 1 I } t r, i L I • 29 _ t . i TABLE 1 0 Cash Flow Basis Garden Offices Estate Residential L_.:._ Density Residential Med. Density Residential Revenue 2750135 480,005 388,567 741,232 Cost 6530709 373,584 3399072 614,981 Revenue-Cost -378,574 106,421 49,495 126,251 i Revenue/Cost 0.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 Cash Flow Basis Nursery/Tree Farm RV Campsite (1) RV Campsite (2) RV Campsite (3) RV Campsite (4) Revenue 274,071 12,6199723 12,619,723 2,230,258 2,2302258 Cost 1,B03,160 10,342,892 11,342,892 5,635,139 6,6359139 { Revenue-Cost -1,529,08B 2,276,831 19276,831 -3,404,881 -4,404,881 Revenue/Cost .15 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.3 I (1) Assumes a C.ty owned, operated and developed facility with a 80% occupancy rate during summer months, 40% occupancy rate during non-summer weekends and a 20% occupancy rate during non-summer weekdays. Land acquisition ccst is assumed to be $5 million. (2) Assumes a City owned, operated and developed facility with 80% occupancy rate during summer months, 40% occupancy during non-summer weekends rind a 20% occupancy rate during non-summer weekdays. Land acquisition cost Is assumed to be $6 million. (3) Assumes a [eased operation with City receiving 15% of total space fee revenue. Land acquisition cost is assumed to be $5 million. (4) Assumes a leased operation with City receiving 15% of total space fee revenue. Land acquisition cost Is assumed to be $6 r million. i i i a i,T"&) CITY OF HUN'1`11`'VG"' ON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 j OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 29, 1982 Mr. Lee A. Branch rtounty Recorder Uunty of Orange P.Q. Box 838 Santa Ana, California 92702 Dear Mr. Branch: Enclosed is a description of the land within the Talbert-Beach Redevelop- ment Project Area and a statement that redevelopment proceedings have been instituted under the California Community Redevelopment Law. Please record and return to the Office of the City Clerk. We also have enclosed a copy of this letter with a self-addressed stamped envelope to be returned with the recording information. Sincerely, otV, 4 -5C-350907 d b, OCT 502 Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk A1-IW:j b enclosures: statement legal description (Tali phon s:714.53"2271 82-350907 EXEMPT When Recorded, Please Mail To: ' C 5 City of Huntington Beach RECORDED FREE PER GOVERNMENT 2000 Main Street CODE SECTION 6103 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attn: Alicia M. Wentworth RECORDING BENEFITS CITY BY PROVIDING FOR REDEVELOPMENT AkEA RECORDED IA O"Icm RECORD$ OF OMM coNW.CAUMM14 DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND WITHIN THE TALBERT-BEACH /4 00 PM Off 5 '82 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA and OL MAW,C090y Recoldw STATEMENT THAT REDEVELOPMENT PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED Proceedings for the redevelopment of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment, Project Area have been instituted under the California Community Redevelopment Law pursuant to a Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted September 20, 1982 by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach by Ordinance No. 2577. The description of the land within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area is attached as Exhibit "A". Date: September 29, 1982 li CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH i .lieu M. Wentworth City Clerk . .- - --» ,-........�ra r•fin......-- . - 1.Ir• i 1 • 82--350907 Exhibit "4" Lrlcj\L DrSCRtIPTiul TiUMERT--BrACH RiJnix'r.LOn: i11t' P[WE_Cr XTA ` Those portions of Sections 35 and 26, T urnship 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and Rancho Las rolsds in tl.c City of Huntington 3each, County of Orange, State of California, as shcx,•n on a map recor-dc-: in Book 51, page 13 of M-iscellaneous !gaps in the office of the County Recorder of said County descrilc"d as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner or said Section 26; thence South 89' 541 23" West 1320.10 feet - long the scuth line of said section, said south lute also being the cent;erlire of Talbart Avenue, to _r re True Point of Beginning, the:lce Mvrth 0° 011 1611 rast 50 feet to a line parallel with and 50 fc�t north measured1 at right anqles Fran the centerline of Talbart Avenue; thence along said mentioned parallel line ►forth 890 541 2311 Last 8n0 feet to the intersection with a line parallel with and 10.00 feet cast measured at right angles Fran the k sat line of Lot No. 3, Flock C of Tract No. 172 as shcwn on a run rc%c=ded in Bcx k 12, page 21, of !•tiscellar/eaus I&'.ars in the office of the County Recorder of sa:,d County; th�,:tce along said mentioned parallel Line South 0° 05' 37" Fast 300 Feet to a point on a curve concave easterly having; a radius of 273.00 feet; th..-nce sout:.her_v :Itong raid curve t1hrough a central angle of 15' 33' 49" an arch disc uace of 74.i feet to a point on a Umi ;ent: reverse carve concave westerly having a radius of 327.00 Feet, a radial to said point liars lbrth 74° 201 34" East; tl•snce soutl:eri along said reverse c-arve through a ceaLral angle of .150 33' 49" an c rc distvlce of 38.02 feet to a line 1a7rallel with and 32 fclet Fast measured at light angles from the west line of Lot. No, 112, Block C, of said mentioned Tract tco. 172; thence southerly along last said mentioned parallel. line south 00 051 37" inst 249 feet Lo the intersection with thr_ easterly prolongatica of the north bow dary line of Tract No. 13197 as sha.n on a trap recorded in fNx,k 452, page 44 of Rit;cellnneous Maps in the Office of the county Recvrde. of said Count!!; thence ala-iq said mentioned prolongation atxl nortlticrl•i lire soutli 890 551 44" west 822 feet to the Brest txun:laxy line of snid 'Tract ;:o. 6197; thence alo;xg said cost boundary line :;ouUt 00 011 1611 west 690 feet Lo tale sough right-of-tiav line of Tayiar Drive, i a st:rcet being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence aiotxt 1 said south right-of-way line scuth 89° 56' 05" west 660 feet to the intersection with the soutl;crly prolongation of the cast line of Parcels Nos. 7-10 as shc?..-n on j a nun f.;ied in Book 79, page 15 of Parcel t:Zps in the office of the Cc nznty Fiacorder (� of said County; tberce along said prolongation and east line north 00 011 15" c•asL 1014 feet to a line parallel with and 33r feet south monsuked at right angles f.rcm the centerline of Taltxrt Averi*,o; thence along last said mentioned par illr_1 line y i 1 , • ,.� 82-350907' ice, north 091 561• 37" east 660 feet to the west line of Tract No. 172; thence along said nest line north 00 Ol' 16" east 335 feet to the True Point of beginning. I� i i .J 82-350907 ' STATE OF CALIFORNJA ) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On September 29, 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Count; , personally appeared Alicia M. Wentworth, known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said City, and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. Witnessed my hand and official seal nT� OFFICIAL SEAL 1 '�- tt ., co���,:c A . �'ocic�vaY (Notary Public s Signature I r rro;FRr FU:�Ii �Ir Connie Brockwa 'Skyj�C.O.�uusslcv cX�us coicrr't1 ages ` lame - yPe or r me I I (Seal ) Notary Public in and for said State i i NOTICE OF DETEPVINATION TO: Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Huntington Beach 1419 Ninth Street, Room 131 2000 Main Street Sacramento, California 95814 Huntington Beach, California 92648 County Clerk E County of Orange P.O. Box 383 Santa•Ana, California 92702 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 2110B or , 21152 of the Public Resources Code. �.Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project � . Project Tfitle _ SCH #82052812 Tom Tincher (714) 536-5542 _ State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number Talbert and Beach Boulevard Project Location — Redevelopment of the Talbert-Beach Area _ Project Description This is to advise that the Huntington Beach Redevelopme.-r. Agency, as ' lead agency", has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared. for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. ! ' The E1R and record of project approval may be examined at: i. i 2000 Main Street _ Huntington Beach, California 92648 II • - 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. i 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project. Date Received for Filing: h ,sue T-Im Tinc r e Director, Business and IndustrialEnterprise cc: City Clerk i 1477�F: ' Superior Court ot••ntt: R'i'ATF OF CAI.IFORNI�. In and fi-r lne County of Cranr,e CITY OF HUNTINGTON PEACH9 Planning Commission - fltctr,pnFllr)+IL�:clniv PUBLIC HEARING Count f i 0ta ge ) 1101X7t1)IA3oprM Awl T� � i'uttntyulOrmrgr )" � V p or A; tI ' TtitSKYxe �AC=6M� JAMIE J. NOORE00 oawrr�,attlp tvslt�r�p�iv• 1 1. ly r4 I „ ley.. , +.•rYA� :rR , .�' 0 J That 1 d and at all limey herein twenty one war n citizen ha of �r� the United titutca,11\'l'r(h!Q�;e Cf(q'L`nty UtlB yrAfy,find that l Wnl am not a party lo,nor iuten mad in the above rnlitled nudlrr, ft 3lrrglyy� tr/11 WOKW Mo llggewYy � that I am the principal cleric of the printor of the +MC r1 tly,'r,le�yr=A F � M1OpI��i wa rtaYrytyl aitr••a tile► •, t rt•Arn►Awewa�ret trtlw„i!e�w Ht!ern Ye i AM • j HUNT. BEACH IND. REV. a t•.ewTI'nprr of„eneral circulati+•n,publi+hrd in the Ccty of HUNTINGTON BEACH County of Oranre will which ncN•paper i+ publir.hed fur lhf: ; ea�^e!Nke " arueMeraflis t t +' di,eininntiun of load news nod intelligence of a{;eneral char.u:• i. rCM Graf �on r1 00 ter, and %hich t:cvsp+per at fill tirnrs herein mcrtti•oned had Ufa dsr>wna'tA�P lferrr� t,s r, r t 6 ,aM8Milflf i art)atilt 1 n( na tide auhti ripliun lie.of{syinr t�6_e►ihrn, M /rawer PAY 4"A,xl� ( r F and which j:Ulbr ita r h:N been e•tdd had,Printed and fob. lip u`d at rc{;uh,r inlrrs•nl.r in lhr nail (,aunty of Orange for n ;3tlttt +. .., aeefi� blttl reriml ciereilin„ one r ,r; t'+'NWri4erl f. �` .'.•e. i ) that the notice, r•f which the IintwNlaj;t epw , r.a ,, •. eri ett!lMlatr0. �a1w4d M " lrtw nnnesrd is a printed copy, has been published in the regular Pa►U.nrlwt'll,t ;.. .: f'•'r•- ' + and entire ilotr of eaid nr;c�Psprr,find not in tiny tupplecn'nt l�_ lad Nei. '., +'1 thvreof,on the fullov iug dntr+,to wit e Dec. 119 1982 _.... ' I 1 1 certify(or drelnrr)un(Iir peunity of frrjury that the fo,ego• in.-b trua anti correct. Dated,tt...... GARDCI4 GROVE .. ......... De Ca 7uruia,this 14....(Ill).of ....c....19.g.... Si;.nnUtre I I Form Mn,W- p A201I2 1!J 77tF' ' Superior Cour; OFUE STATE OF CALIFOIINIA In and for the County of Orange f ('1TY OF 4WITING T ON BEACH. P I?tnrlin? COM-155ion rltOOr_�1)�I't1ttl,tCATmN I • ' PUBLIC IiEARING St ale td('alifurria ► — "(MOtx�t)VL�atf!Vl!7tt�ct Lttttrtn�Il t 7t•t ---..+��-t it+NiOWM t�LAD TYx t>if TJit[�3tr 0/ Cauut)u(prangr )M �11�KKYceY=CM(W .!<t7VTItYQ(*pht 1nRLtY(W Mg rLR71lTt/.t1G�t AQ0 Wq alty L ___41ta 01(i:Ltll� Yt�nG11iM�LN ' JAMIE J. MOORE L{Yt° i�'�/�fi•�+ro �tg•a That I am anti at all times herein mrnti+iae a d ryas n c(tir.n of hrC.t#1ttlbw:t twoprtw rtfj� I Ala United t p rty Ill,note the Age of Itveuty•oi;years Am that I '�"M *Lbretsss+ �i� 9 "►1 I { ara not a potty Ill,our in,erested i,t;l,e n)ruve entitled mutter; ` ittiabwitrrnr:t1 �rr,ies s�y►� 1 1! that I not the ptin:•il'Al dark or the printer of the ��'t "�R P"vm a-Iv, Ire{f,`► thexlpte°"rr---0isAM, r1 it HUNT. BEACH IIJD. Rr-V. rb. "are:mkot � 'aia�%iettile ;Ccrpintia cart is) Ma„rri ib ,ram a nrxspaptrtaf j rurral rirruLtti,n.paabliehri!in the City of -� brx "trr Mtl•.t.t • � sM.wHUNTIPGTOJ BEACH . wi,t a�it•.,.. .:,s:. •.. .,.�" f N ttK Y )4tnwracu ant uk Cuunty at Oran;:r. and which newrpaper is p,►hlirhrd for the City L�Ciria+ tiortttel�lcl°omW N a odthe SI ter. And%vun of IaKnl nruv and ir,rclG,;rnee of a rrtacrol chirac. t�rtMbea�eard��iw. � ter, noel vehich ncw�paper at lilt times herein rnentiorred had w and still hai n hnn:t ode pub.rription lilt of paying huhacrilx.re. Ls,an+d �p �'�' M�►�.�. rf and which nra•,pujier has ta.+rn canhlishrrl,pr3•tt.d and ant. " �>drrtr4d� a*, strd►t ttlwyw 7K�4 1aM B liihrd at trguiar intrnali in the enid Cuunty of Orange for a t A�t6,ywtred t:rrix( erceeding one }•tar, that the. nutict•, of %hich the P�+rraewd xJ�rtarMi �iit4Nr,l�slt,rsrg' annexed e s ptintea rrapy, has bcc�t puhlii!ra! in the rrguhtr Kr tl sctrtad +I►�I4N1 a �: J(t' .) `tS� ''+1 and entire i,tte of eaial neu•�paper,and not in any supplcntrnl �.' r'•'- '+ 'thr.cor,on tlae tnll(ming datrs,to wit ;)Cc. 1.1, 5982 1 certify(or declare)under penalty of .er'ur• inr Is true Alyd corrnt. t ) ) hat the fnrcSa,• GA !)nterlrt......... RDEN GROVE , ralifurnia,this . 4. .,day of..B�C�,• t� .......... ...... . ................ Signeturr i I I ' Form"M POP D2082 1 REQUEST Furl CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMEMI AGENCY ACTtON Date December 15, 1982 Submittadto: Honorable Mayor/Chairman and City Council/Redevelopment Agency Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City administrator/Chief Executive Officer Prepared by: f'S Office of Business and Industrial Enterprise Subject: TALBERT-BEACH OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS AND RESOLUTIGN OF l� NECESSITY Statement of Issue, Recorn.mendation, Analysif, Funding Source, lternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached are owner participation agreements with Citadel Ser4ice Corporation and Collins/Zweibel Development. These agreements represent the first of several commitments on the part of the existing major owners of property to implement the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Plan. Because there will be a need to assure the consolidation of selected parcels in order that bath public and private accessways can be developed and the terms of these agreements accomplished, a Resolution of Necessity is also attached which delineates parcels which could potentially require public acquisition. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hold public hearing and adopt Resolution of Necessity (Attachment No. 2) 2. Hold Council/Agency public hearing on Citadel Serv'ce Corporation Partici- pation Agreement (Attachment No. 3) and adopt appropriate resolutions. 3. Hold Council/Agency public hearing on Collins/Zweibel Development Partici•• pation Agreement (Attachment No. 4) and adopt appropriate resolutions. ANALYSIS: i These actions represent the culmination of many months of effort on the part of City staff and the participating owners to establish a viable development program within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area, The approval of these agreements will require that specific commitments be carried out by both the property owners and the Redevelopment Agency which will result in an expansion of housing resources within the City, the elimination of the fragmented and nonproductive land resources which now exist, and, of greatest significance, the conveyance of land to the Agency which will be used to support the develop- ment of the Terry Park Senior Citizen Housing Projects. It should be noted that the estimated value of the land which will be conveyed to the Agency is either equal to or greater than the anticipated costs which the Agency will incur in carrying out the agreements as presented.. The Agency will contract with the City in a manner which will provide that the City will carry out the tasks and provide the appropriate funding necessary to fulfill U ✓ r the terms of the agreements. The Agency will be compensated for this obligation by the conveyance of property having comparable value. The City will utilize its HCD or other finds to finance these activities for which it will be reim- bursed by the Agency from future tax increment funds which will be generated. Thus, the entire project will be self-funding with the results being that, for its efforts, the Agency/City will secure the property needed to support the senior citizen housing project in addition to the other benefits described. FUNDING SOURCE: 1. Agency - future tax increment dollars; R. City - HCD or other funds at the Council 's discretion. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: j Not adopt agreements and continue negotiations witli the existing property owners. I ATTACHMENTS: I. Report on proposed development and implementation plan. 2. tolution of Necrssi Aaenc Resolution No, 56 3. Ci tade C` er orpora+:ion proposa - Staff Report - Council Resolution No. 5208 adopting CEQA findings - Council Resolution No. 5209 approving Section 33445 Report - Council Resolution No. 5210 approving sale of land and terms of agreement - Agency Resolution No. 57 adopting CEQA findings - 0.gency Resolution No. 58 approving Section 33445 Report - Agency Resolution No. 59 approving Citadel Service Corporation Participa- tion Agreement 4. Collins/Zweibel Development Proposal Council Resolution No. 5211 adopting CEQA findings - Council Resolution No. 5212 approving Section 33445 Report - Council Resolution No. 5213 approving sale of land and terms of agreement - Agency Resolution No. 60 adopting CEQA findings - Agency Resolution No. 61 approving Section 33445 Report - Agency Resolution No. 62 approving Collins/Zweibel Development Participa- tion Agreement. NOTE: ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND WILL RE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY UNDER SEPARATE COVER. CWT:TT:jb r I t 1 REQUEST f UR REDEVELOPPiENT AGENCY AC'ON Date N ber 23, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency A'�0s, Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer�rt , 8 � 1 Preparedby:� Office of business and Industrial Enterprise Subject. COMMENCEMENT OF NEGOTIATIONS FOR ACQUISITION F TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AREA Qr PROPERTY ------- rif. Statement of luue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternativa Actions, Attachments: N I STATEMENT OF ISSUE: It is anticipated that the Agency will have before it one or maybe two of the participation agreements for development within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area on December 20, 1982. Since these agreements may necessitate that the Agency acquire certain parcels associated with either the development of the t necessary public improvements within the area or for the consolidation of developa- ble sites, it is necessary that we proceed immediately in making an understanding as to what our position will be in regards to the acquisition of selected par- cels. Therefore, we request authorization to proceed immediately to negotiate such acquisition and, thus, be in a position to present to the Council a full analysis of the prospects of successful negotiations or the need to use eminent domain in order to carry out our obligations under the terms of the agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to initiate negotiations with owners of jl property within the Talbert-Beach Redevetooment Project Area as delineated an the attached map. ANALYSIS: Since the agreements, which will be presented to the Agency in the very near future; require a commitment on the part of the /, main proceedings on selected parcels if a negotiated -ale cay to lnotcbee'accomplished, our Special Redevelopment Counsel advises us that resolution of necessity for the acquisition of these parcels must be adopted concurrently with the execution Of the agreements in order to meet the letter of the law. i Since the acquisition law requires that offers be made prior to the adoption of such resolutions, we must proceed immediately to make such offers and attempt to acquire the properties through negotiated sales. It may be, in fact, that such agreements 011 be reached prior to the meeting on December 20 and, j will not be required that resolutions of necessity be adopted for all proper-tiesinvolved. i .�Z,,... Plo 1!!!1 s , i FUNDING SOURCE: It is anticipated that, prior to the actual acquisition of the selected sites, the Agency will enter into a cooperative agreement with the City whereby the i City will acquire the property with the use of CDBG funds that have been alloca- ted for the project. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Defer the authorization until some- time in the future. 2. Not proceed with the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: Map 11I CVT:TT:jb j . ! I i � I 'r 'JJ i i ' i l m 165- I8 Vi AP • ��>rt/EE.T To Ems' ,�Sfi' GGvNF�2�f'/�..5 {�rz- -- . MLBER7- " 64 c AVENUE" J a}•ta . ..as +......srsraq�s.r Saar ttaei • aea ' LOr4 L_ S3 Lor6. COTi3 LOTC, Lori, LCT4z LCT:7 �LC7r6' �2- TRACT 7!B to 'JI_— ;f2 __ 7 i8 �9- �3 �/O _ J/ �r2 d7 _ 59 r8 I { 3! v -- - • - -J� - --il?_ _ �B -- 9 - - r�- -tl_t_ - �2- --lQ '1S /7 _ _ 18 a ,Ia � ,5 .16 f7 _ tE � ,:4r, ,e t L- �� 4 I _ I" ?2 6 r9 ?_� _ 2t 3 22 2.3 S 25 76 '27- -l28 �0� I -- - - -'?�- - ;•30 _ �29_ _ '3G� _ 43/ .3S 6 / t__ - r - - - 1 Vie_ 3/ ,? 3 j: �S .36 ! I t , {4 aJ 62 { - 1.j - - •- --• - - - - - - -• --- - - i= - - - - j36 _ _L3T 3B _ _�39 _ c0_ c! o --r3 �s2 _ rTZ 38 39 - c' - - � f' - - +' I7 ,8I ,t 4 I .. 5c5 ,C4 5 -I-6 - ---17� 43 43 4 1 - � j_ 4T48 c3cs 4 _ _ - .4546 C3 - - -4- 8 - c= - - =- _ - t7- - '8 - ;30 _ _'S/ _ _ 52_ 'S3 r5� S: `4g0 �5Q - -,St � r� !Sa ! �s4 _• '� 'SB { � -tEr 1-- --�- - - 60 - S - - - - B23 - - 0 53 _ _56 _ 7 -,SS_ -,60 '64 k63 66 '07 '6a 55 t 3 66 .67__ 16a _ 65 , 162 , I 69, �12 %F7 '68 I S t / - - -!- - - - - •6'= - -66 _ yIN -•_ 72_ _ ,T3 o rJ TJ l7 : 58 _ -»69 - `4) 67_ _ 6816. - ,� �i.- _ �72 _ �79 _ _ �T9- _ } �3 a rr 9 T_ _ 7S _ _ - ytT - .`°- - '3` T" 175 _ tM '7 - J6 r t 4 - -'- w I ' ■■ t t _ _j_ f _ _ 7a TS - i 77 .79 85 85 fi7 'dB �R_9 '�} _ !K,-_ _9 Iso 8/ o _ 133 �84 _ � _ t8= � 3t _ {29� ,�, cB4 t # � „_ •S ES 1O B6 g.,� o (Z t 186.0 - - 79 BO_ '�� t _ -g6_ _dT _ _ 8 57 86 _ 67 se_ _ 99- -t'0 - _.99_ I!JO� ,ICr _ _'!02 _ �C3 _ �,C. 3.00.4c. , , , rq t t' t- �.7 t r I r r [i ^- - - - - _� 9S - -i 5- - iC6 _ 'rOT �C8 _ �09 97 98 99 ICJ JC2 97 9sc�� 99 1 r 271 ICi JG2 �9T 98 1 t. i t [ 31 t - - 9 C3 'JC4 ', ' t t - i - •+ - - '� - - ��. C� _ �C� - �J3iIs - tY6 _ '117-_ ilB -�'= - -1:_ i i ; a r , I 2.636,.4ry _ -'�'- - Y'- - �� "' _ r/Qg •a. �123 i24 1125 - -- -} l0r _ �Jln_ _ l J _ _ r _ I . , - _ �'. -i .1_ * Z. ,l11 _I/S_ _r,"J� _ltCJ r!!. r I?_:1E- r 3 t�/4 *I2T _ �J30 _ 13_/ •.2!? _ r!S I}JiT_ _ I!8_ _ '�//9 _�J2i_ IIJS /t6 _ «I7 !IIB I/9 !20 ttS n _ - - - - - - - - - J 't2J 'J 11 ! - - !- 6 3 - t1"7_ �J34 M;3569 '136 - :3T- 77 l ----;- _ - !- _ L_.3 _ �I?4 �122i12J _ �J22_ �J?3� 2aJ�S- -ll - �Ja _ r _ T 3 !aaa5. '• fah 22 '! , I - _ J - _ - - fJ t, _ ;2T _-'2B _ ,t29- -{/3C_ _,Jj _ ��- -!7T _ ^t26 _ %25 - 'QC 'E/- T r .4 _ ytS3 - {.�J - a3 _ 35 _ 30'_ _ �3T__ - �33 _ rja _ .J.35 _ a36 _ rt T - ��- ..i�a_ •_ '1=s _ 'Q6 ' {!3T _ �JJ- - i55 156 113T- t A' 'Jaa ' t i - - -+ - _�511VO �, - - - -{�2_ _�f?.3 _ I4a- - tic vp- ,1a1 - _1faP_-� yfe8 - }f4a_ _ 67. . - '16_3 _ '164 - �65_ _ 166 '/67 ff.5 •las J46 .l.:T IsB !40 .150 145 N6 /c-- .: 'icB sa 1�9 :150 Icy I ,%49 r"-SO J69 dTD .,,,.l / � ,172 %T3 t/T4 • .�a a�,>:rT a�rt7wre ae two s f�!,are.ai r u�t s sit s t s.is.aw r.es s ro'.:! •aT t•:o. it r 1 't I` L ' •, , LM .J LIJ - ttLtPPP�PP[Pf f �r LUteti tt nn ' LJLJ1P%o�itP�tP�� 1. :ri' ' • 'L' t#;ttet/ fir---•� LO LIJ aoul ill �tittt �l� PstPtP t. O otal gall titC) 0 :� i t frig ft%t � = � , , • :,..�.:� ` dtowe LJLJ 1 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HLINTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA September, 19a2 7 t i . 1 ' I J t TABLE OF CONTENTS Section PAge i 1.0 AITRODUCTION I 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelopment Plan ,1 1.2 General Definitions 1 f 1.3 Project Area Boundaries 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan 2 f 1.5 Duration of Plan 2 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan 2 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2 2.1 General ObJmAlves of Redevelopment Plan 2 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants 4 ► 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 5 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures 5 2.3.2 Moving of Structures 5 2.4 Acquisition of Property 5 I 2.5 Relocation Asslstancr, to Displaced Residential 6 and Nonrealdential Occupants 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements 7 and Site Preparation 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency g Property for Uses in Accordance with this Plan 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 9 . 3.1 Cooperation with City 9 i 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions 10 t 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area 11 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements 12 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 15 ► 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed 15 Financing Method 3.5.2 Tax Increments 15 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes 17 3.5.4 Loans snd Grants 17 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens 17 3.5.6 Financing Limitations 17 List of Exhlblta A. Redevelopment Project Area Map 19 B. Redevelopment Project Area Legal 'Description 20 i I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to tha Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, this Redevelopment Plan Is for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project In the City of Huntington Beach. This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Lew.of the State of California, Health and Ssfety Code, Section 33000 et oeq., the California r Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. f The proposed redevelopment of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project i Area as described In this Plan conforma to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council and as thereafter emended. r This Proposed Redevelopment Plan Is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on April 20, 1982. 1.2 General Definitions The fallewing definitions will govern In the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise Indicated In the text. "AA cam" means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington each,California or any successor In Interest (e.g., C.D.C.). 'C�mnann the City of Huntington Beach, California. "City Council" mear* the City Council of the CIty of Huntington Reach, California. "County': means the County of Orange, California. I "Legal Description" means a description of the land within the Project Area ' prepared In accordance with map specifici,tions approved by the California Sttto Board of Equalization and attached hereto as Exhibit IS". Wap„ means the Redevalopment Plan Map for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". "P�on,'' means any individual, or any public or private entity. "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project In the City of Huntington Beach, Ca,lfomla. "Planning Commission" means the CIty Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Pm act" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "Proleat Area" means the area included within the boundaries of the Tatbrart-BMWI iedevelopment Project area as described on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit 11811. I r � 'Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Law of the 5ta a of California (California Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et seq.), es amended to date. "State" means the State of California. "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency In the manner provided by Sections 33670 to 33677, Inclusive, of the Community Redevelopment Law and Article XVI, Section 16, of the California Constitu_ion. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The legal description of the Project Area Is attached hereto as Exhibit 18". 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan The administration and enforcement of this Plan, Including the preparation ; and execution of any documents Implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered Into pursuant to this Piro may also be enforced by court litigation Instituted by either the Agenc; or the City. Such remedies may Include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, Injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provislonb which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregetlon provisions which shall run In" perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the pmvlelans of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City CouncU or until all outstanding Indebtedness of the Agency shall be retired, whichever Is later. 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established In the Redevelopment Law or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Obiectivea of Redevelopment Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared Its dualre to Improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and In particular those areas within the City which have become blighted because of deterioration, disuse and economic, Physical and social maladjustments. As a part of the City's ongoing reeevolopment efforts, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: -- Eliminating blighting Influences, Including deteriorating buildings, Incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public Improvements, obsolete structures, and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; improve the overall appearrace of streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and prlval.e; and assure that all buildings are safe for persons to occupy. -- Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Area to participate in redevelopment activities. — Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to imcourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base.• -- Mitigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that It constitutes a serious physical, social, and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. -- Providing adequate public Improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. •- ' Providing construction and employment opportunities In the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities In the operation of the proposed industrial facilities. . -- Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains, and other improvements as necessary to assist development of the Project Area to conform to the' General Plan as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. -- ' Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area In accordance with modem and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the proviulons of the Community Redevelopment Low and the government 'code of the State of California. To obtain the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency Is authorized to e-Wertake most or all of the following Implementing actions.- - Acquisition of property. -• Participation by owners and tenants in the redevelopment project. -3- i II, ■ 1 ..- RelocatIon assistance to displaced residential occupants as required by law. -- Development of adequate parking, landscaping, public Improvements and facilities. ... Demolition clearance of properties acquired, and site preparation. Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to asalst property owners and tenants In the Improvement of their properties to carry out the objectives of the redevelopment plan. Assist In providing financing for private and public development In the Project Area. 2.2 Participation by Owners and Tenants 2.2.1 Rules for Participation Opportunities and Re-EntrX Preferences Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by such factors as the land uses designated for the Project Area; the provision of public facilities; realignment of.streets if required; the ability of owners to finance acquisition and development of structures In accordance with the Plan; and any change In the total number of Individual parcels In the Project Area. In order to provide an opportunity to owners and tenants to participate In the growth and development of the Project Aron, the Agency shall j promulgate rules for owner and tenant participation. If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sites or land uses, the Agency shall establish reasonable priorities and preferences among the owners and tenants. Some of the factors to be considered In establishing these priorities and preferences should Include present occupancy, participant's length of residency or occupancy In the area, accommodation of as many participants as possible, similar land use to similar land use, conformity of participants' proposals with the intent and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, ability to finance the Implementation, development experience and total effectiveness of participants' proposal In providing a service to the community. Owner participant priorities shall take effect at the time that the Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the Huntington Btsach City Council. In addition to opportunities for participation by Individual persons and firms, parti0pation to the extent It Is feaslble shall be available for two or more persons, firms or institutions, to join together In partnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. The Agency shall upon the request of any conforming owner issue to such owner within the first twelvo montn3 after the adoption of the Plan a certificate of conformity In a form suitable for recordation with the County Recorder's Office. The Agency shall not use errilnent -4- domain to acquire property owned by conforming owners so long as use confbrms to Plan. the event that the Redevelopment Plan Is amended after a duly noticed - public hearing to flange the requirements for the property, such otherwise conforming owners may be required to enter Into an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event any of the conforming owners desires to construct additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on any of the real property previously described as conforming, or acquire additional real property within the Project Area, then such conforming owner may be required to enter Into a participation agreement with the Agency In the some manner as required for other cwners. 2.2.2 Partite tlon Agreements The Agency may require each participant to enter into a binding agreement with the Agency by which the participant agrees to rehabilitate, develop, or use tha property In conformance with the Plan and to be subject to the provisions In the Participation Agreement. In such agreements, particloants who retain real property : shall be required to join In the record:tlon of such documents .qs Is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. f 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures While no rehabilitation of structures Is anticipated for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment area, the Agency will be authorized to rehabilitate and conserve, or to cause to be rehabilitated, any building or structure In the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. + 2.3.2 Moving of Structures As Is necessary in carrying out this Plan and where It Is economically feasible to do so, the Agency Is authorized in Its discretion to move or f cause to be moved any standard structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area and dlipose of such structures In conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2.4 Acquisition of Property Except as specifically exempted herein, the Agency may acquire, but Is not required to acquire, any real property located In the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase, eminent domain, or any other lawful method. It is In the public interest and may be n-pessary In some Instances, In ardee to eliminate the conditions requiring redevelopment and in order to execute the Plan, for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property In the Project Area. The Agency shall commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the Project Area within twelve (12)years after the adoption of the Plan. -5- i The Agency is not authorized by law to acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. The Agency Is authorized, however, to acquire private property which was formerly public property by being transferred by deed, lease, or otherwise to private ownership or control before the Agency completes land disposltion within the entire Project Area If the Agency and the private owner do not enter into a participation agreement. The Agency shall not acquire real property to be retained by an owner pursuant to a participation agreement If the owner fully performs under the agreement. The Agency Is authorizud to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which thode structures are located. The Agency is also authorized to acquire any other Interest In real property less than a fee. The Agency shall not acquire real property an which an exloting building Is to be continued on Its present site and In its present form and use without the consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires substantial structural alteration, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation to assure that such building Is safe for people and/or businesses to occupy, or (2) the site or lot on which the building Is situated required modification In size, shape or use, or (3) It Is necessary to Impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Plan and the owner falls or refuses to participate In the Plao by executing a participation agreement. The Agency shall define the circumstances to which this section Is applicable. The Agency may, In its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real'property within the Project Area and the owners of ouch property will be permitted to remain as conforming owners without an owner participation agreement with the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use and maintain real property within the requirements of the Plan. However, conforming owners may be required by the Agency to enter Into an Owner Participation Agreement with the Agency In the event that such owners desire to (1) construct any additional Improvements or substantially alter or mddlfy existing structures or any of the real property described above as conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary, In the execution of the Plan, the Agency Is authorized to acquire personal property In the Project Area by any lawful mean, Including eminent domain. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Resldantial and Nonresidenticl Occupants The Agency shall aseL. all families, individuals, or other entities displaced by the project In finding other locations and fncilitles. In order to carry out the project with a minimum of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist Individuals and families In finding housing that Is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, In reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by acquisition, construction leasing, rehabilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing Inside or outside the Project Area for displaced persons, and to meet housing replacement requirements of state law. -6- i I II The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons (including families, business concerns, and others) displaced by the project, fo, moving expenses and direct looses of personal property (businesses only) for which relmburaement or compensation Is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of tha State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate existing residential tenants within the CIty of Huntington Beach. 2.6 Demolitlon, Clearance;Public Improvements and Site Preparation . The Agency Is authorized to demolish and close or move bulldings, structures, and other Improvements from any real property In the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. r If In Implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families r of -low or moderate Income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate Income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or stele to persona and families of low or moderate Income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, in accordance with ' all of the provisions of Suctions 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. The-Agency is authorized to Install and construct or cause to be installed and constructed temporary public improvements and temporary public utilitie3 necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public Improvements may Include but are not limited to traffic signals; streets, and utilities. Temporary utilities may be Installed abovo ground. The Agency Is authorized to Install and construct or to cause to be installed ' and constructed with the consent of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach the public improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry ovy. the Plan and to pay for part #;: all of the value therefor, If the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public Improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the Immediate nelghborhood In which the project Is located, and (2) no other reasonable means of financing ouch public improvements are available to the Community. Such public Improvements may include, but are not limited to, pedestrian walkways, bikeways, streets, curbs, gutters; sidewalks, street lights, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, electrical distribution syaterne, water dictributionn systems, plazas, parka and playgrounds. It Is anticipated that the Agency will construct and provide the streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street lights, underground utilities and landscaping within the public rights•of-wny which are within the Project Area. ..7_ The Agency is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building sites any real property In the Project Area owned by the Agency. When the value of such land or the cost of the Installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other Improvement, or both, has been or will be, paid or provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter Into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which It agrees to reimburse the Cite or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structures or other Improvement, or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. 2.7 Disposition and Redevel22mant of Agency Property for Uses In Accordance with this Plan Far the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or dead of trust, or otherwise dispose of any Interest In real property. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency Is authorized to dispose of real property by leases, trades or hales by negotiation without public bidding. AU real property acquired by the Agency In the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted In the Plan. Reel property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. Property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency shall be offered for resale within one year after completion of rehabilitation or an annual report concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve etch powers and controls In the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for specult tine purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. I All purchasers or lessees of property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which. the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deem3 necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency, as well as all property subject to participation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use prrmlts, or other means. ..g.. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All property in the Project Area is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, In the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a participation agreement shall be made expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease sub-lease or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain such nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses as are required by law. To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other Improvement either within or outside the Project Area for Itself or for any public body or entity to the extent where such improvement would be of b9nefit to the Project Area. During the period of development In the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that eavelopment In the Project Area Is proceeding In accordance with disposition and development documents and time schedules. For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency Is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer; assic)i, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property. 3.0 REDEVELOPNENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Coo2!ration with CIty Subject to any limitation In law, the City shall p!.j and cooperate with the Agency In carrying out this Plan and shall take any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blig?it or those conditions which caused the blight in the Project Area. Actions by the City shall Include but arc not necessarily limited to the following: -- Institution and completion of proceedingo for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights-of-way in the Project Area. Such action by the City may Include the abandonment and relocation of public utilities in the public rights-of-way as necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. -» Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and Improvements in publicly-owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. -s- i -- Revision of zoning, if necessary, within the Project Area to permit ft, land uses and development authorized by this Plan. .mposition wherever necessary (by conditional use permits or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels In the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop and provide for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all real property, both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this Plan. -- Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered In accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. -- Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of all conceptual plans and amendments to said plans pertaining to land use and development in the Project Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to application approva! by the City. -- The City is authorized, but not obligated to provide and' expend funds to ensure the completion of the project as a whole In accordance with this Plan. The obligation of the City to perform the actions Indicated In this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described In Section 3.1 hereof, be contingent upon the continued availability of funding for this project primarily from tax Increment revenues as defined in Method for Financing herein. in the event that such funds, at any ' time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this j project, the obligation of the City shall thereafter be limited to providing assistance In the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead coats in connection with the termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced purquant to this Plan. •• The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project. 3.2 Cooperation with Other Public Jurisdictions Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, wii.h or without consideration, in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of much public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. —10— I i The Agency, by law, Is not authorized to acquire reel property owned by ' public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property In the Project Area. The Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained In the Plan to ensure that y present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the ` requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or leases property In I the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner and tenant participation if such public body Is willing to enter Into a participation agreement with the Agency. During such time as property, If any, In the Project Area Is owned by the � Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its disposition for redevelopmenL . I 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area I -- Private Uses Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those residential, .:.I Industrial and other uses as shall be illustrated from time to time in the General Plan of the City. Specific permitted uses within the .� Project Area are those that are permitted, or conditionally permitted, by the zoning ordinance contained In the Ordinance Code when the zoning ordinance conforms to the General Plan. The number of dwelling units will be In accordance with the provision of the General Plan and zoning ordinance of the City. -- Public Uses, Public Street Lay o�utL Right s-of-Way and Easements The public rights-of-way, principal otreets and streets that may require Improvements as proposed for the Project Area are Illustrated In Exhibit A. , Streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper development of the project. Additional public streets, alleys and essflments may be created by the Agency and the City in the Project Area as needed for proper development, circulation and access. Semi-Public, Instltutional, and Nonprofit The Agency Is authorized to permit the astabllshment or enlargement of public, semi-public, institutional, or nonprofit uses, Including, but no; necessarily limited to, educational, fraternal, employee Institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such uses, If allowed by the Agency, shall conform so far as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses In the specific area Involved. The Agency shall Impose such other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. ' 1 —11— 1 I 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements All real property In the Project Area to hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. Furthermore, the Agency may, if It deems appropriate and/or necessary, specify requirements in excess of those described herein or specified by state and local laws. No real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise chnnged after the date of the adoption of the Plan except with approval of the Agency and In conformance with the provisions of this Plan. -- Construction All construction, whether new or rehabilitation, In the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws In effect from time to Lima Including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. I -- Rehabilitation and Retention of Exlsting Canforming Uses • Although the Agency does not anticipate that any ext:aing structures within the Project Area will meet the standards for ii;habilitation they, with Agency approval, may be repaired, altered, reconstructed, or rehabilitated, If neceasary, In such manner that will meet the following requirements: -- Be safe, sanitary, and sound in all physical respects; -- Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the building code for the City of Huntington Beach. Shalt conform to all codes for the City of Huntington Beach. Shalt be comparable in appearance to the architecture of the on-site proposed new structures. •-, Retention of Existing Nonconforming Uwe The Agency Is authorized to permit an existing use to remain In an existing building In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use Is generally compatible with the developments and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter Into a Participation Agreement and agree to the lmpositlon of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. —12— I I I The Agency is also authorized to permit an existing use In an existing building not In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provision of this Plan, provided that such buildings are rehabilitated to a decent, safe end sanitary condition, as determined by the Agency, and provided that such a use is generally compatible with development. and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter Into a Participation Agreement and agree to the Imposition of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. Incompatible Uses No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, noise, odar, or similar factors would be Incompatible with the surrounding areas, Vructures or uses shall be permitted In any part of the Project Area. Subdivision or Consolida[inn of Parcels i No parcels In the Project Area, including any parcels retained by a participant, shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approvel of the Agency. -- Limitation of Building Density The number of buildings In the Project Area will be consistent with building Intensities permitted pursuant to existing or revised local zoning ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plari. •- Limitation on Types Size and Height of Buildings The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building, and other applicable codes and ordinances and this plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the l Plan shall supersede. All now buildings built within the Project Area shall complement the overall aesthetic and physical scale of the existing buildings within and adjacent to the Project Area. -- Open Space, Landsce,elna, and Parking 'An approximate amount of open space Is to be provided In the Project Area as required by City codes and ordinances and the Plan. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets, public and private parking and private streets shall be provided for In each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances In effect from time to time and this Plan. -13- I I In all areas sufficient space, Including open spaces, shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide eduquate light, air, and privacy. Slons Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearances by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation, or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted in this Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the lend parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. Nondiscrimination and Nonsegregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted In the cafe, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. •- Emglo„yees and Contract Awards from the Community Contractors and others engaged in construction and rehabilitation activities In the Project Area shall be encouraged to hire and train the maximum number of employees and trainees from within the community consistent with the objectives of this Plan. Likewise, where feasible, the Agency shall make distinct efforts to award contracts to business concerns which are located In, or substantially owned by persons residing In, the Project Ara-a if they meet requirements stipulated by the Agency and this Plan. Minor Variations Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency-Is authorized to permit minor variations from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit such minor variations, the Agency must determine that. -- The strict application of the provisions of the Plan would result In practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of this Plan. -- There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the Intended development of the property which do not generally apply to other properties having the same standards, restrictions and controls. fitting a minor varlatlan will not be materially detrimental tL public welfare or Injurious to the property or Imp, nto within or outside the Project Area. -14- y . 1 .- Perms, a minor variation will not be contrary to the objectives. ' this Plan. No such minor varlat'cn shall be granted which changes a basic land use or which permits substantial departure from the provisions of this Plan. in permitting any Loch minor varlation, the agency shell Impose such conditions as ere necessary to protect the public health, safety, or-welfare, and to assure ccmpllance with the pu-poses of this Plan. Nondiscrimination and nonaegr-gatlon restrictions tit-all not ba subject to minor variation. Na minor variation permitted hY L-'le Agency shall bo eft ective until conditional uses, variances, or other zoning changes, if eery, haw- been effectuated by the City to the extent necessary to ab•-sin consistency with such minor variations permitted by the Agency. 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed Financing MAthnd Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the A acy, If It deems appropriate, Is authorized to finance this Pr act with avilstence from the CIty of Huntington Beach, Orange C, �ty, State of California, Fedoras Government of the United State America, any other public agency, donations, special assessrrc; !Istrlets, property tax increments, Interest revenue, incoln revenue, Agency-Issued notes and bonds, !Hens from private Instituciora, 'the leecse of Agency-owned property, the sale of Agency-owned p , norty, or from any other sourcos of financing which legally avallc• and do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. The City may supply advances and expend money as necessary to asslsi they Agency in carrying out this project. Such atelstance' shall be an terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Such and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 3.5.2 Tex Increments Tax Increment financing may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the project' assessed valuation base will be established In accordance with*stato law as described herein. Any tax Increments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the Increment by itself or from the sate of tax allocation bonds allows. All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Aran each year oy or for tha benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called .axing agencies") after the af!ectire date of :he ordinance approving finis Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows: -15- a ;i A That portion of tie taxes which.would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of sold taxing agencies upon the property In the redevelopment project as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of ouch property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to tho effective date of such ordinanoe, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into thow funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxos, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or fcr any taxing agenc; or agencies which did not Include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory Is annexed or otherwise Included after at�h effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange .!jst equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used In determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in tie project on said effective dated and That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid Into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and Interest on bonds, loan, monies advanced to, or Indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) Incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whale or In part, this redevelopment project. Unless and until the total assessed value of the taxable property in the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property In the project shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and Indebtedness, If any, and Interest thereon, have boon•paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the project shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are pa!d. -» That portion of taxes discussed In this Subsection are hereby Irrevocably pledged for the payment o! the principal of and Interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the Incurring of any indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance in whole or In part the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project. -- The Agency Is authorized to make such pledyes as to speziflc advances, loans, and Indebtedness as appropriate In carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creatlun, and bonded Indebtedness contained In this Subsection. -is- 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes The Agency may issue bonds or notes when a determination has been made that such financing is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be Issued only after the Agency has determined that funds j are, or will be, avallablb to repay principal and Interest when due and payable. In any case, the Issuance of bonds or notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their Issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not' a drbt of this City, the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for them, nor in any event, shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency] and such bone-i and other obligatlone shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an indebtedneas with the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. 3.5.4 Loam and Grants Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the United States, at any other public ►x private source will be utilizad if available as the Agency deems appropriate to Its corporate purposes. i 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burden The Agency• may In tiny year during which It owns property In a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and county, district, including, but not limited to, a school district, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been s levied upon such property had It not been exempt, an amount of money In lieu of taxes. The Agency may also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area other than the City, any amounts of money which In the Agency's determination Is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the , project. ' I 15.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2 and 33334." of the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following lk.;tatione are Imoeeed on this Plan. Taxes as defined in Section 33670 of the California Community Redovelopment Law shall not bet divided and shall not be allocated to the Agency during any one fiscal (tax) year except by amendment of this Plan, in excess of i35%000. -17- -- No loans, advances, or Indebtedness to finance, In whole or In part, the Redevelopment Project and to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes describer in the beforementioned Section 33670 shall be established or Incurred by the Agency beyond 20 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City. Council unless such time limitation Is extended by amendment of this Plan. However, such loans, advances, or Indebtedness may be repaid over a perind of time longer than such time limit. -- Without an amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded Indebtedness swerved by tax Increments which the Agency shall have outstanding at any one time shell not exceed $3,500,000. Not less than 20 percent, of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 ahall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and Improving the community's supply ..of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income, as defined In Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very .law Income households as defined In Section 41067, unless one of the following findings am madeo -- That no need exists In the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or Increase the supply of housing for persona and families of low or moderate Income or very low income households; or -- That some stated percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which Are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33470 Is sufficient to most such housing need; or — That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate Income housing needs in the community Is being made, and that this r,ffort, Including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, Is equivalent In impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The C.ty Council of the City shell consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low Income households from within or adjacent to the Project Areal because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or Indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plsn. i 1 i I I I 1 Exhibit "A" Y�.��.� �►x.fi.aR. �.C.tX.9X.ti C,C.CXI • , AA •1• �.I • -Ai XA N �Sul. AM . . . .ix JI.4-Xic- Alt-1 • t X.1.4 Jim 1 i .e.r. K. (� so O O O� .Z x a. tx.t�►.+C.� A.lk ID •low R rt. .K e ,f l�.t X.i. 4 Awl IV w . • , . ' . , , , ,y� :ram '�w . . �• � rwW . O '•r ; • -. � � of rrac� � .7r ' a�r.res�■�.r�jw�som.rr 3 %W, -19- LEGAL DESCATPTIM TALBEK-BEACH RED�:tgWPMFM PRWE C-T APEA Those portions of Sections 35 and 26, 7awnship 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa C:hica and Rancho Las Salsas in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as sham on a map recorded in Book 51, page. 13 of Misc.ellaneaus Maps in the Office ref the County R000rder of said County described as foLiow t BegLnningr at the nutheast corner of said Section 26; thence South 69' 54' 23" West 1320.10 feet along the south line of ,said :section, said south lure also being � the centerline of Talbert Avenue, to the True Point of Beginning, thee= tkx-th 00 Ol' 16" East 50 feet to a. line parallel with and 50 feet north measured at right angles frm the centerline of Talbert Avenue; therKm along said mentioned parallel line North 890 54' 23" East 800 feet to the intersection with aline psralle.l with and. 10.00 feet east measured'at right angles from the east line of Lot No. 3, Block C.of Tract No. 172 as shown on a map recorded in Hook 12, page 21, of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said 0=ty; thence along said mentioned parallel line South 0' 05' 37" East 300 feet to a "�► point on a curve concave easterly having a radius of 273.00 feet; thence souther tv along said curve through a central angle of 15c 33' 49" an arch distanm of 74.1 feet to a point on a tangent reverse cur,e corn=ave3 westerly having a radius of { 327.00 feet, a, radial tc. ,aid point bears North 740 20, 34" East; thence southerly along said reverse curve through a central angle of 15. 33' 49".an arc distance of 88.82 feet to a line parallel with and 32 feet Fast measured at right angles from the west line of Lot No. 82, Block C, of said rwtioned Tract No. 172; thence southerly along last said mentioned parallel line south 011 05' 37" east 249 feet to the intersection with the easterly prolongation of the north boundary line of Tract No. 8157 as shown on a map recorded in Book 452, page 44 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence along said mentioned prolongation and northeriv line south 890 55' 44" west 822 feet to the west b=4ary line of said Tract No. 8197; d'*nce along said west boundary line south 00 Ol' 16" West 690 feet to the south right-of-way line 'of Taylor Drive, a street being 60 feet .in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence along said south right-of-,,ay line south 89' 56' 05" west 660 feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the east line of Parcels Nos. 7-10 as shawn on a map filed in Book 79, page 15 of. Parcel Maps in the Office of the Canty Recorder Gf s:.i.d County; tlx3'm along said prolongation-and east line north 00 Ol' 15" east 101-4 feet; to a ling parallel with ar.3 336 feet south measured at right angles from the centerline of 'filbert Avenue; thence ,along last Raid mentiarn d parallel line r ... .. y .. -' ....... _. .. ... ... ....... ... .. .. .. a ... .. f._.=err,.+_..-..w�:s.a..► north 11" 111 11" east III feet to the west line of Tract No. 172; thence along said west litre north 00 Ill 16" out 335 feet to the True Point bf BegirxdM. i A 4 t' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 P. 0. Box 190 cING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT em" +u►rtiNcrO r D EACK.CALIF. HAY May 20, 1982 i } Alicia Wentworth City Clerk SOJECT: TALBERT-BEACH, OAKVIEW, YORY.TOWN-LAKE AND MAIN-PIER. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS Dear Alicia: Enclosed are copies of the Draft EIR's for the above named protects. The review period has been established for 45 days between May 24, 1982 and July 7, 1982. Any comments you may have will be incorporated in and re- sponded to in the final EIR's. Thank ynki in advance for your consideration of these documents. Any ques- . tions you may have can be directed to me at the number below. Sincerely, 4 . I� Tom Tincher, Director Business and Industrial Enterprise • i ' TTdb enclosures f i f i Telephone (714) 536-5542 t RECEIVED CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNIINOTOH BEACH.CALIF. rrrreA' DRAFT FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT May, 1982 i • i i i 1 transmittal authorized by Redevelopment Agency on May 17, 1982 (Resolution No. 28) i f 1 j I •t t TABLE OF CONTENTS Sectlon 1.0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTICN 2 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 7 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION 7 MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS i 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 16 F� 6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 16 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 17 �" 'i 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS 17 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 18 '{" .43 10.0 ORGANI'LATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 18 APPENDIX A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19 APPENDIX B, INITIAL STUDY 20 ' •L I + »Ir l't� .. ..f...1...-. T ..... .. ♦ ., . . .... .. .. i ♦ ... -......—,.._.. ++. .a.. ..•..i....-.-..a.t+irt.+14"�l?C2 TJ7:'.3l ft Y1nr4'ili/.w' ,a sum The proposed project consists of adoption of a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the 30-acre Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the plan is to remove existing blight and Improve the physical and economic well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, If owners In these parcels are desirous of participating In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This Impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate L steps to negotlatu the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair ; market value, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress { and Its activities. Although the Impact of relocation could be negative, .its long-term Impact Is expected to be positive In that relocation will afford 4 residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The Impact from project Implementation on surrounding 1 neighborhoods Is also expected to be positive over the long term. Construction of modern well-planned Industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermorc, In achieving such development, existing blighting Influences will be Irradicated from within the Project Area. Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, It is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could expurienect certain negative Impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray wat9ring as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive Impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In develrpmer►t of modern and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. As presently envisioned, It Is the desire of the Agency to construct approximately 470 new residential, senior and multi-family unite and to --reate approximately 100,000 square feet of new light Industrial development over the same time period. The total value of Improvements is expected to exceed $35,000,000. J s Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately five residences. The pre:lae layout of new development, phasing and level of activity Is impossible to predict,at this time. As development proposels come before the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted If required by C.E.G.A. The generalized impacts of an additional net 470 residential units and a net 100,000 square feet of new Industrial development Is discussed in further detail In this report. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared pursuant to the State EIR Guidelines for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Plan. This EIR Is intended to provide decision makers with useful Information on the Impact of the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to adoption of the plan by the Huntington Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken in Implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plan will be subject to further environmental evaluation in accordance with the California Environmental Gu:ility Act of 1970. M2.2 Project Location The proposed project Is located in the City of Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile southeast of downtown Los Angeles (refer to figure 1). The proposed Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project as selected by the Huntington Beach City Planning Commission consists of approximately 30 acres as shown In Figure 2 and as legally described In Appendix A. 2.3 Protect Objectives { An outlined In the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the objectives are to: Eliminate blighting Influences, Including deteriorating , buildings, Incompatible and uneconomic land uses, inadequate public improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve the overall appearance of existing buildings, streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings, new and old, are safe for persons and businesses to occupy. - Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Area to participate In the redevelopment activities, thus sustaining the existing Industrial base. I - Providing adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with an Improved economic base. -2- � N •t • •t mow: 2? ads +ti r Cr F1Ip•� pis 44••faSo :! too 6086&— !',f ••.. O ti ___�'1 =O [III. fy r —. 1 a••a•aw ' ' a•t r•f• /•If ha�dao. •. 9 i t.. _ass _—» —.._ t`s.sa pwat ra+w.. �. -•C a • a•.+•. •� i ..M.LOS � �+ . j • aCKJ •.- __.�^— O J� Lows O G 4• .t • wla•i•. a7 a r etc jp ra ~ r J 1 • aitwaNt _ 1 •i I I ••i.t TM �. J. 7= • i t o" ��....... O `s n as .• Ootlh t� tDS AIaGELES "�'• •.a,aw.r Y D' Qs••..a• ORANGE COl7"TV p ...� .1 nufa w \ }} a Iva" 57 � I u aaa..••O —`_� S''�. 4 • .y .e.0►wy CD I .... � •a•.•asr•e•c. No woovQ s1 O •aatl•t.• 91 ,,9i` 1 0 rc i i s...7. •..a•a.t p•• p'�!�y 99.J� moose"Mit• •a sr +•+ I' , 0 � • ►KM I. •"""' .•r a•«t-. I t Gt.\fit w�sru[-k[�[ ;mar `_- w TactI t .C��`r •J I to � tray e�f4{I!� low - ♦ - iqM to— '« . VICINITY MAP of L HUNTING` ON BEACH f' FIGURE 1 t .A. r.. .... •i..w• •w•JI..I 'a.A..r :i w.. • n•a•.. .a.. .. ..I.dl.i..11•J.•7\ Y.J. �N��I�i,�1A,1 :,� i*� •• a•+ .a. .�,',�' 'r.+.. .w..w.J►�Jl..t/.+�I1•.1 , • •A.JL.t..Y•7ha !1. A .�is i. •r�•Y M A• ..r..i.i..1•.AIM ji; "'tow .•�•R.•a• J ►•L•w.•!.K•.R.h•M •w w•i.•,n.1 R•M►�,1• �•�\ww�roA. � .w.•w .'� F•A•A•i•JV�q•w.w :K.1r Y , . • .1►•ll.�� Y, r.•i/ t ■ *,1 .1 ♦: •!•• , r�•N.•w•w w.w•. •w..i.• •1\•M�14. ♦11.JR•. ./ . / 11.lt.'II�� Ir..M.rr.w./►x.0 w.YrVar.Y�i.a �Y •r,.,.i, M w}..w.i+,:w.y� y1 »..+r..l.► r.i.i.Jr.JI►.li\ / i ��• ..A.A rlli.�+ •A•M.41►.il..+A►. �11r 1/.•./.MI• L.111.}}...1A•K•,'• iJ. •rHrr.•r• •JII•A•„•r 'y`'..yr.•.•ri�•11•w•Y..: /a.awY�•Y..M.}..b. OL a� r Wow �r 1 �r� w.• !• r ♦ti TAL ERA'- ►CAI "*ACT FIGURE Z -a- to i I l - Mitigating development. limitations which have resulted In the .'ack of proper utilization of 'the Project Area to such an extent that they conytltute a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. ' - Providing adequate public Improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cannot be rememed by private or governmental action without redevelopment. - Providing constriction and employment opportuntles In the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed industrial facilities. Impleme4ing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Pro/ect Area residences which may be displaced, in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Lew and the government code of the State of California. 2.4 Protect implementation ` To implement the proposed project, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is proposing the following activities within the Talbert-Beach Project Area: Acquisition and sale of property. i - Participation by owners and tenants through the improvement of their properties or through other opportunities to participate in this or other redevelopment projects. I Relocation assistance to displaced residential and nonresidential occupants as required by law. Development of better parking, landscaping and public Improvement concepts and facilities. - Demolition, clearance of properties acquired, provide public Improvements, building and site preparation. i - Other actions as appropriate, inr:!uding, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants In the Improvements of their properties to carry cut the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. -5- The land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities and building Intensities and standardsi which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: 2.4.1 Land Uses _ - Industrial. Principal uses would Include light manufacturing, fabrication, produ--tion and assembly, wholesale, distributive :end office/warehouse uses. - Residential. Primarily medium to high density residential uses Includlny condominium development and :senior eitiren rental tinitn. - Community Facilities. New streets will be developed and existing streets will be improved when feasible. 2.4.2 Principal Streets Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street Lystem. Local street Improvements will be Installed for each particular development. 2.4.3 Population Densities Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 7-15 dwelling units per gross acre for Medium Density Residential development and 25+ dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. 2.1.4 Buildin Intensities All industrial and residential uses throughout the i''roject Area shall conform to } or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the final Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the }redevelopment Agency +. acid the City Council. 2.h.5 Standards Minimum standards for the Project Area include current specifications for public works construction, building codes, zoning and subdivision regulations and all other applicable local, county and state regulations. 2.5 Project Duration Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent Dombin proceedings shall be limited to 12 years from adoption of the plan. -6- i i 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The nxisting environment for the City of Huntington Beach is well documented In the Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Community Profilo, the Huntington Beach MIscellaneous Historical Data and several previous environmental Impact reports all of which are on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL. EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS This section of the Focused Environmental Impact Report will examine the general Impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific Impacts of the type of development/redevelopment that Is presently envisioned by the Agency. As previously indicated, Individual projects that are Implemented over the next several years will be subject to further ! environmental evaluation in accordance with C.E.G.A. ' 4.1 General Impacts of Redevelopment As stated in the Prellmiriary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project, the general impact upon the residents of the Project Area and on the ' surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1). blighted areas will be replaced or rehabilitated, (2) .relocation of residents when necessary will be In compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) there will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. The proposed development will result in khe loss of existing open land. However, as described above, this loss would not cooistitute a significant impact as the development will be consistent with ' present zoning and the antl0pated uses will be beneficial to the community. In addition to these Items discussed In the Preliminary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneficially impact the Project Area by: - Providing additional affordable decent, safe and sanitary housing to the existing stock within the City of Huntington Beach. - Providing adequate parcels and required public improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing the City of Huntington Beach with a stronger economic base. I I - Mitigating development limitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Project Arca to such an extent that it causes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. - Providing construction and employment oppertunities In the development of now housing and Industrial facilities and by providing employment opportunities In the operation of new Industrial facilities. -7- 740 Implementing the construction oc reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as 1 necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted rouses within the Project Area in accordance with modern competitive development practices. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, jf owners In these parcels are desirous of partlelpatiog In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner purticipants) resulting from Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's: (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value*, (2) Initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the sdoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced and are } qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotlateo and sufflclent time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised nf the Agency's progress and Its activities. Although the Impact nf relocation could be negative, Its long-term Impact Is expected to be positive In that relocation will afford residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The Impact from project implementation on surrounding i neighborhoods Is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development of modern, well-planned Industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic Impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. +� Under Eminent Domain Law (1263.320), fair market value of the property taken Is the highest price an the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obliged to sell and a buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the purposes for which the property is reasnnably adaptable and available. When the Agency purchases property, it usualij, v.,V! pay cash. This Is of additional -jenefit to potential dioplacees when compared to today's "creative financing" type of transaction, where the seller usually erds up receiving monthly payments on a part of their equity. Sellers usually have one additional year to purchase comparable property before they are required to pay capital gains tax, because most redevelopment transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. _g_ Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the commun!ry over the long term, It is possible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could experience certain negative Impacts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these Impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modern and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed redevelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the Implementation of the General Plan and Its goals and objectives which have guided the development of the City since its adoption. 4.2 Specific Impacts of Presently Envisioned Redevelopment Activities I As presently envisioned, It Is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the construction of, approximately 470 new residential units and to assist In the creation of approximately 100,000 square fe;.L of new Industrial development. The total value of Imprnvements would be approximately $35100%000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately five residences. The precise location of new development, phasing and level of activity Is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, Individual environmental evaluations will be canducted as required by C.E.©.A. The generalized Impacts of an additional net 470 residential units and a net 100,1100 square feet of new industrial development can be summarized as followst *Residential - 470 Units }} - 3,000 vehicle trips per day Increase j - 650 parking spaces increase • 70,000 gallons of sewerage per day increase - 90,000 gallons of water per day Increase 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase 200 potential maximum student Increase t: *Industrial - 100,000 Square Feat 400 vehicle trips per day increase - 275 parking spaces Increase 7,000 gallons of sewerage per day Increase 10,000 gallons of water per day Increase - 500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase * Estimates have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associates using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. -g- is A population increase of 700 will probably require the addition of approximately .5 firemen and related equipment, .6 policemen and related equipment, may require additional educational facilities and may require the addition of sewer and water facilities. Many of the costs for providing Increased services could be provided by the Redevelopment Agency. It Is anticipated that some changes will be required In the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and in the solid waste management system. The proposed project would generate about 1,600 pounds of emission per day. More detailed Information will be required prior to Implementation of Individual development projects. Although It is impossible to project specific activities, It Is presently envisioned that Agency assistance will be required to Implement up to 300 senior units, up to 170 apartment/condo units and up to 100,000 square foot of light Industrial development. 4.3 Mitigation Measure- The proposed Redevelopment Plan is a means to mitigate the Impact of blight In the Project Area and Improve the social, environmental and economic conditions In the City. While the project Is beneficial, minor adverse Impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered st this stage of the redevelopment process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed In accordance with provisinns of the Uniform Building Code which governs construction relative L) seismic movement. Onslte r„,ading and earth removal will be performed to the satisfaction of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosion of soils, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the proper engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No unusual mitigating measurer beyond the regular controls of the City are proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Air i As mitigating measures, the Agency will encourage improved circulation, the extension and Improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usage, energy conservation, bike routes, paths and open space and green areas. 4.3.3 water I i Development as proposed by the Redevelopment Plan will create an additional demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher intensity development may require expanding capacity and Improving local street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a more specific Indication of ictual site development plans occur. No specific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. -10- 4.3.4 Plant Life The project will remove no significant vegetation since none is In existence. Landscaping will negate the Impact of providing an urban land use on currently vacant and redeveloped property. Landscaping Is anticipated to be in excess of City standards. 4.3.5 Animal Life The Project Area Is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. Landscaping of the Project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhance a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. 4.3.6 Noise j Noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to Increase f significantly. Normal construction of building is anticipated to provide a minimum outside-to-inside attenuation of 22dBA which will reduce the inside noise to a level approaching 45dBA. No additional mitigation measurers beyond the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the City's Noise Ordinance will be required. Noise from traffic within the Project Area will be reduced because of Agency/City improvements to road surfacing, traffic control equipment and removal of mixed land uses. in addition, implementation of Section 27160 (a) of the California Vehicle Code for auto and truck manufacturers will result In a �. decrease In noise levels from engines and tires; by 1987 all vehicles must be at levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 Light and Glare Landscaping will "soften" the visual Impact of the possible light and glare resulting from the redevelopment of the Project A:ee. Landscaping plans for each redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers for app -oval by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. The City will also exercise sign control and architectural control over the new development In the ;project Area. 4.3.8 L and Use As previously stated, the land uses of the Project Area are proposed to be redeveloped to rriltigate blighted conditions. Future residential development will be buffered from adjacent developments to mtt=gate any potential conflict from adjacent uses. 4.3.9 Natur;' Resources Wherever feasible, existing structures and improvements that are scheduled for demolition will be recycled to comterve on the consumption of natural resource. 4.3.10 Risk of Upset No significant hazard of explosion cr hazardous substances Is cnticipated. No mitigation measures are proposed at t'>Is time. -11- f t 4.3.11 aoAu_latjan It is doubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantially great enough to create a significant adverse Impact to the City. With regard to the displacement of persons and families, relocation assistance will be provided. - Relocation Assistance. The Agency shall assist all persons (including families and others) displaced from tho project by the Agency in finding other locations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences bg necessary to carry out the project, persons displaced from their homes shall be assisted by the Agency In finding housing that Is decent, safe and sanitary; within their financial means; In reasonably convenient locations; and as otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency Is authorized to provide housing Inside or outside the Project Area for those persons displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. - Relocation Payments. Ths Agency shall make relocation payments to persons including fam°Iles and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses for which reimbursement or compensation IR not otherwise made. in addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs Incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shell be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency mjy make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make every effort to relocate Individuals and families. - Temporary Relocation Housing The Agency is Futhorized to provide temporary relocation housing on cleared sites within the Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, standard and docent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prior to permanent disposition and development of such cleared sites. If feasible and desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites outside the Project Area for p;oviding relocation housing resources. The Agency Is also authorized to provide temporary relocation housing in houses acquired by the Agency that are being held for gale and/or rehabilitation. 4.3.12 Housing. Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocates, to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of Increasing And improving the cummunity's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income, as defined In the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: That no need exists In the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or Increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income households; or -12- 1 r That some stated percentage, less than 20 percent, of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing needs; or That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs In the community Is being made, and that this effort Including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate Income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent In Impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate Income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation ' Redevelopment will assist In correcting interior circulation resulting In improved traffic flow and provide improved access and additional parking. 4.3.14 Public Services No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, additional manning of such services as fire protection, building Inspections and police protection, etc. will be necessary to maintain the some level of service that now exists. 4.3.15 Energy The following energy conservation measures are recommended for the new structures: I Use of as much salar and alternate energy rs Is feasible. Open gas lighting should not be used in public or private buildings. Electric lights should be strategically placed to maxlmlze their efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. - Electrical heating in public and private structures should be discouraged. Solar assisted heating systems should be encouraged. - Reflecting and/or insulating glass should be used in structures where a d windows re not shade b exterior architectural projections y r l pr jec I or mature plants. 4.3.16 Utilities No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. i -13- r' 4.3.17 Human Health No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, It should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be improved by being relocated Into housing that is decent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.18 Aesthetics Architecture and landscaping site plans will be approved by the City. - Incompatible Uses. No use or structure which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoke, glare, nalse, odor or similar factor would be Incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. - Subdivision or lonsolidation of Parcels. Parcels in the Project Area, Including any parcels retained by a participant, will not be oubdividea or consolidated wl':hout the prior approval of the Agency. - Limitation of Building Density. The number of bu;laings In the Project Area will be consistent with building intensities permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances tar the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. - Limitation on ape, Size and Height of Buildings. The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building and other applicable codes and ordinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. - Open Sace, Landscaping and Parking. The approximate amount of open space to be provided In the Project Area Is the total of all areas which will be In the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the open spaces around buildings, and all other amounts of outdoor areas not permitted through limits on land coverage by the Plan to bo covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where now construction occurs shall be submitted to tha Agency for review and approval to ensure appropriateness and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Areal both public and private streeto and public and private parking shalt be provided for In each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances In effect from tine to time. Any private streets tir nff-street parking must also comply Jth regulations Imposed by the Redevelopment Plan. Lights Air and Privacy. In all areas, sufficient space shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air and privacy. -14- • - atanging, Signs which create hazards cr u,isightly appearance by protruding, blinking, flashing, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted In the Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. 4.3.19 Recreation No mitigation measures are proposed at this U.ne. 4.3.20 Arche� ological,�Historical Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified Individual will be retained to Investigate the significance of the Items, catalog and remove some for further study Find preservation. No other mitigation measures are proposed. 4.3.21 Development Standards New Construction. All construction In the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws in effect from time to time including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, heating, grading, plumbinn• sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. I. Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Usta. Any existing ?. structures within the Project Area which meet the standards for rehabilitation may be repaired, Rltered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, if necessary, In such manner that will meet the following requirements: Be safe, sanitary and sound In all physical respects. ° Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington Beach. i o Shall conform to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. Shall be comparable In appearance to the architecture of the on-site proposed now structures. 4.4 UnavoIdable Effects The proposed project should Improve the community's overall economic situation and, as a result, bring about more job opportunities, increase population and provide a higher quality of life for the residents of Huntington Beach. These factors, In turn, will place a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, power and land resources, as well as contribute to air and noise pollution. -15- i The implementation of the Plan will result in the clearance of selected housing structures, the construction of new multi-family housing and industrial buildings; the pavement of streets and parking lots; and the development of other facilities that will probably result in increased rainfall runoff. During the course of implementing the project, there will be some temporary disruption to normal activities due to convtr,iction. Construction, as well as the provision of public Improvements, will result In the utilization of certain natural resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum and lumber. Implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan will result In the acgoaisltion of certain property and the relocation of owners and tenants. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Pro ect The "no project" alternative would alloy the Project Area to continue In a � blighted condition for an indefinite period. The application of existing federal, state and local funds Is not adequate to significantly prevent Oxisting deterioration or to significantly Improve existing conditions. 5.2 Smaller Project Area Designation of a smaller project area will not achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan or eliminate the blighted conditions. 5.3 Largec Prof ect Area Establishment of a larger project area would require more extensive Investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not necessarily enhance the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plan's objectives. ; 6.0 LOCAL SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS The Redevelopment Man provides policy direction in the establishment of land use categories In accordance with the General Plan. The Plan further provides for the acquisition of property, demolition end replacement of structures; relocation of some families and businesses; Installation of reconstruction of streets, utilities and other site improvements; and financial methods for Implementing the project. The Redevelopment. Plan Is designed t" provide direction for the trens:aon from present short-term policies to the long-range goals and objectives of Huntington Beach. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective for 35 years. Not to Implement the Plan at this time would be to Intensify the conditions of blight and deterioration that exlut within the Project Area. If implemented, the Plan would arrest these conditions over the long-term, and would help promote ' the eronomle and physical well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. } i -16- i { Concerning underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects will be a loss i of open space and some resources. I The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, demolition, relocation of households and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the Intensity of residential development will Increase and will result In additional congestion. Noise and air emissions in the Project Area would likewise Increase. 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS Although the project will result in the utilization of certain resources such as sand, petroleum and lumber in the construction and implementation of Its various proposals, and will result In the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, it is unlikely that the Impacts of the implementation of the project would result in any more adverse environmental changes than would the j continued growth of the City under normal conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the improvements called for in the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land already committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should be mitigated by the steps outlined in this repurt. 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as a series of events In casual sequence beginning with job creation: The creation of new jobs then leads to job shifts and vacancies, followed by immigration and a demand for shelter. This, In turn, is followed by an ordering of land uses and a shifting of the spatial configuration of the labor supply. The shifting of the location of the supply of labor is a stimulus for th,a new location of business and other economic activity creating jobs and starting the growth cycle over again. The regional growth cycle constitutes the source of the oemand for the construction of private and public facilities. The actual physical pattern of the growth In the City Is the result of the chronoiogical order and size in which specific parcels of land are developed. The relatively small size parcels have limited the growth and development possibilities in the Project Araa. The consolidation of parcels in the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden the possibilities for more Intense development and growth. The implementation of the project will have a growth Inducing Impact to the City by increasing the population by about 700 persons. The proposed project will expand the housing stock of the City by about 470 units and will Increase employment opportunities. i i +1 1 -17- l�I 1 I II I i 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environmental Impacts identified In the Initini Study as Insignificant (Appendix a) Included primarily those related to land, water, plant and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. Theso Impacts were dismissed primarily because they are not affected by the proposed project. 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED i ' 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise I0.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Protect, April, 1982. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Pro,�osed Redeveloment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air Duality Handbook for Environmental impact Resorts, SCAG. 10.5 Geotechnical Inputs, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources Survey and Inventory, tington Beach, California, Archaeological Research, Inc., April 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Element Amendment, EIR 81-6, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services. 10.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. � I -18- I i Appendix "A" r--. LEGAL DESCRIPTION TALBERT-BENCH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Those portions of Sections 35 and 26, Townshop 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and Rancho Las 6olsas in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly prolongation of the west boundary line of Tract No. 172, as shown on a map recorded in Book 12, page 21, of miscellan- eous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, and a line parallel with and 50.00 feet north measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along said mentioned parallel line 793 ± feet to the intersection with a line parallel with and 10.00 feet east measured at right angles from the east line of Lot No. 3, Block C of said mentioned Tract No. 1712; thence southerly along said mentioned parallel line 300 t feet to a point on a curve concave easterly having a radius of 273.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 15033'49" an arc distance of 74.16 feet to a point on a tangent reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 327.00 fce ; thence southerly along said reverse curve through a central angle of 15033 49� an arc distance of 88.82 feet to a line parallel with and 32 feet east measured at right angles from the west line of Lot No. 82, Block C, of said mentioned Tract No. 172; thence southerly along last said mentioned Parallel line 250 ± feet to the inter- section with the easterly prolongation of the north boundary line of Tract No. 8197 as shown on a map .recorded in Book 452, page 44, of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of sail County; thence westerly along said mentioned prolongation and northerly line 832 - feet to the west boundary line of said Tract No. 8197; thence southerly along said west boundary line 690 - feet to the south right-of-way line of Taylor Drive, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence westerly along said south right-of-way line 660 ± feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the t:ast line of Parcels Nos. 7-10 as shown on a map filed in Bonk 79, page 15 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence northerly along said prolongation and east line 1014 t feet to a line parallel with and 335 } feet south measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along last said mentioned parallel line 660 ± feet to the west line of Tract No. 172; thence northerly along said west line 385 t feet to the point of beginning. � I i I, I i -19- ........ ... f0k FILING ADMINSTRATIVI iizIGULATIONI Appendix "B" wiTH THI IICRrTARY of STATI ( (►urnanf to Gorurnwenf Code 6606"11319.1) _�5_ 55. Appendix J is added to read: 1 t PPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: City of Huntington Beach FROM: Huntin tan Beach Redevelopment (Responsible Agency earlAgency) Agency 2000 Main Street 2000 Main Street dress dress Huntinston Beach, California 92648 ?'•untiniton Beach, California 92648 SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report The Huntington Beach Relpyelnc A will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an ei-vironmental impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which Is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EI.R prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project . • M z The project description, location, and the probable environmental i effects are contained in the attached materials . A copy of the Initial ti Study /17 is, = is not, attached. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be °x sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after 8 receipt of this notice , j Please send your response to Tom Tincher at the 1 address shown above. We will need the name foi, a con ac person in your agency. PROJECT TITLE: TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE April 28, 190,2 Signature t4Z �L`�----- Title Executive Director Telephone 4714) 536-5575 Reference: California Administrative Code, Title 14 , Sections 15035.7, 15054 .3, 15066 . -20- n,n.� Q os► ._ UNtwwtnto mat FOR FLUNG AONNISTRATM REOULATIOM5 WftM THE SMOTAAY OF STATE C/rmw w 0"wMal C46 try 1IUU) 74. Appendix I in Added to rend: APPENDIX S EWIRONMFMAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proponent Hunt n ton Beach Redevelo mant Agency 2. Address and Phone wumur or Proponent: 2=0ai0 Street/P.O. Box 190&wLington R(o{//ar�ch. Califot.nia 1„r49 ,w„��. ,,��,,,,�,,,...,�,,_�+ 1 WA) 516- 3. Date of Checklist Submitted May 5. 1982 4. Agency Requiring Checklist „�, 5. Nagle of Proposal, if applIcable i Tal�t Beach Redeve?gpment Plan II. ENVIRONMENTAL T.N1 ACTS (Explanatione of all "yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets, ) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth, Will the proposal result in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic subatruaturea? X,.„ $ b. Disruption*, displacements, com- paction or overaovering or the soil? ,.X c. Change 1h topogre•phy or ground surface relief features? di. The destruction) covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? 5_ .a. Any increase in wihd or water erosion or soils, either on or otf the site? ...... ...,.. X f. Changee in deposition or erosion or beach sands, or changes in siltation# deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed or the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X -21- I . F012 FILING ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS WITH IMI SECRETARY OF STATE (h"01 N 0M'M"MR1 We S.eftok M20.1) r YES MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or eimilar hazards? X 2. Air; Will the proposal result in: + a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X i b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ._..� X 36 Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X N b. Changes in absorption rates, a drainage pattersni or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X X -,..- c. Alterations to the course or $ flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface y water in any water body? X._ l e. Discha.,ge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperatures dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _..._ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in tho quantity of ground waterse either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cute or excavations? X -22- cae�rsM»rnoei t+Mtt FOR nUNG ADMIHIMATiVI Iti OU ATIONS WITH T'H! WAVAAY OF STATI 0011"M M Ogle~CaM 604"113MI) YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Xlow— _ 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X` �. Plant Life. Will the proposal result I'n':_' a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? „X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ,X„ e. Introduction of new species of plants into art area, or in a barrier • to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ....�. ^X 0 x 5. Animal Life, Will the proposal 8 result M a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any rpecies of animals (birds, land animals Including reptiles, fle%j and ehellfiuh, benthic or anisms, insects or miero£aunal? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? as Introduction of new species or animals into an area, or result in �! a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Daterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? -23- � CvtiriMYAridlf trNlft FOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE RiGULATIONS WITH THE 59CRRTARY OF STATE (►ow$"to ow"04W t Cafe W04 113MI) } I v YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increaser in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new M-Tit or glare? X �, 8. land Use. Will the proposal result in a su s antial alteration of the present or planned land use of an. area? X g. Natural Resources. Will the proposar RPM int a. Increase in the rate of use of 8 any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any x nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Hick of Upset. Does the proposal involve a r1sR of an explosion or the releaze of hazardous substances $ (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? �+ X� 11. Population. Will the proposal alter e locationt distribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? X 12. Housing.,_ Will the proposal affect ex s nE. hodaing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation/Pirculation. Will the proposal result n: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement! X -24- CM11 VA110N MINT FOR FILING ADMINIATRATIVE RMULATIONS MH twat 56UMNY OF STATe YES MAYBE NO b. Effects on existing parking facilitlea, or demand for new parking? a. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? r,X, d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail ! or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to I motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal ve an a ee upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: h. 'Fire protection? b.• Police protection? J , , i c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. %hintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? _.._ f, Other governmental services? _.$... .. 150 Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or anergy? ..X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, t or require the development of new sources of energy? -25- MMIMVAIIQ" MOT • FOR PKING ADMINISTRATM RIGULATlOM WITH TMII IKUTAKY OF $TAH thngw M 049womm coh W"11310.11 MPO YES MAYBE NO 16. Utilities. will the proposal result n a nee-a-Tor new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities; a. Power or natural gas? i b. Communications systems? X E o. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal Fis-ulfn; a. Creation or any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding . ! mental health)? ...__ b. Exposure of people to potential : health hazards? r 18. . Aesthe Acs. Will the proposal result n e o s ruction or any scenic = vista or view open to the public, or 8 will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19, Recreation. Will the .proposal result 3n"an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeol26ical/Historical. Will the propose result- In an a eration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X i -26- 1 ON Moa MW FOR RUNO ADSY1tNIMATM RNUTAMM WITH THS 18=AAY OIL STATA thef�Ml M QwM�t GSM bed 11300.1) i ..Maur, No i i i 2t. ndittgry.Xill4i.Lar _Qf -Signif JgLaje. (a) Doss the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, i substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife 'a population to drop below self sustaining laurels, threaten to eliminate a plant or -animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important exmmples of the major periods of California ` history or prehistory? Wft b. Does the project have the poten- tIA1 to achieve short-tent, to. the disadvantage of long-term, environ- mental goals? (A short-term Impact - an the environment is one which 000ura in a relatively brief, 4 definitive period of time while long=terra impacts will endure ' well into the future.) „_,,,,,• x_,,, e. Does the project have Impacts which are individually limited, 8 but cumulatively considerable? (A Project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impnots on the environment is significant.) x d. Does the project have environ- mental effecto which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x III. DISCUSSION OF EMVIRONMENi'AL RVAUTATION 1 -27- 1 I 1 *M.oaA • tOMUATION S11Qt FOR FILING ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS WITH THE `ICRITARV OF STATE (Arwom to GvvaswA two tall"113M) IV. DEMMINATION - (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation% 0 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this cape because the ; mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. LX I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT in required. ; c U Late JJ 1 Aar�,l 2Q, 198� (SIg ure Charles W. Thompson- For' Hunt nutan,-Beach ReftvehPment�,,,Ageency � t 0 z I -za- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ` Oi►1CLaLluaeMCss -4* _ SENDER INSTRUCTIONS +aE to Awn Mnmgm CP PWTAoi am w P*n po nom.md4rm wW ZIP Cade In ft elect bdvjL usewaL • Caenyku leans 1.Z mad i m ue ewmta • Atuft to fecal of W*b 0 o m pwmhl6 f Od N I-e m to lad of actML • E adom mWelftnaa RKabi Rogmeme • ed'ieont to eenabee. i RETURN t TO Mr. Tam Tincher. Director j Business & s�lMOT,Enterprise CijX of Huntington Beach 3 p.d. BOX i,.(. atROLBmc HuntingtRpleacb. -• _ ry�Ste.and T�PCode f � O$ENDER:Complete items 1,2,3,and 4. Uri W1.e40. Add your address In the"AMRN TO"space (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) on reverse. t.The following service is tequaled(check one). (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) { Show to whom and date delivered 11.1"he following service Is requtsxd(check one). ❑ Show to whom.date,and addras of e':tivery. �.0 �5how to whom and date delivered.—__.— _.0 E ❑ RESTRiC[[[)•DI?LIYERY —C ❑Show to whom,date,and address of ddivery.. _.._,e ' Irhe marrcrrd dth.ery/rr it ths?W k eJ!aa,ae t.❑ RESTRicrED VELIVERY the return rMot;te) '—C (71it narruttd deh.r jn r sAe,Ya w eddui�.» TOTAL 3 rhr return rrrrlr,r Ju.7 f AEssEot TOTAL s+ 7)�x„P e �� /�• + ar L t7ft it a6A"!to ARTICLE IeUs . �� ❑REOt1TEr1E0 []NSVP.EO D / (�� 4L MI OF URYK:et Arincte willom (l� 7 REntsTEPED p ZT.'4 4 4:: ` McERTsfadD ocoo ❑ ❑w.r�AEn Z1� Ia11 SS taa1L ®CtRT1iE0 ❑C0� T 7 (Always Obtain signature Of addres"t Or a9"0 EAPAESS MAIL t have recenad the antcte lcscnlxd aba.e. (Alrisys obtain signalure of addresses or agent) SIGN ❑ Addres+eF ❑ Authorized sger,t 1 have received the article described above. �< SIGN ❑ u � d&Best i s oEtavutt ems- rasTtsAttat , M o TE YUt Qto K C r• ...r, , 28� e /►ppReiaaE a A00AE it lV■t/✓^H�w.w� a AtVAISM s A00A. a(C,4 ►,uMMt a t0 oe vin dEcAuf is ra mTLUA Ey at1j� J.WMADU To OE1 to SECAWE: IL nnTs T a 3 •SENDER:Compists Nems I Z 2,and 1. O •SENDER:Complete items t,2,3+and d. Add rev rse. ajn die"PETUfiN TC'apace Add your address in ttm•'RETURN TO"space on reverse.r. � On reverse. (CONSULT laOWIVASTER FOR FEES) (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) T.The following service is requested(check ooc} I.The following tervice is tegaestcd(check one). 14 Show to whom and date dahvtrsd ..... ._C 1A Show to whom and date delivered.................... ._..e ❑Show to whom,We,and a itu of dd(vtry.. .._C 0 Show to whom,dale,and address of delivery.. _e 2.0 RESTRICTF0 DELIVERY _C (7lteresrr6rWde for keAtr=rJl4add.aw"w z•❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY aha►rh M rrtryv frig:) (lhr rr0nr»d drhrrry jW is cAeetrd vs sddlAa 1a the rrrurn rreevi/"I TOTAL >�..__ TOTAL >i . RTac�e A ,h ,�,tyt 1 e Ac•'rta.;cRoep Fh tE11vICt1 M17cte AyMet�1 IL TYPE OF SEAV CEt ARTICLE HUMBER it O ❑ITta:Att:f ❑AEGISTEREO ❑IMSUAW rLTr Qcoo 1/60 � �1 13CIAlIFYIID [) e fi MAIL ca obtain signature sf addresses of Numb) ni (Always obtain signature of addresses or ageived the article descr t*d above. I have rrcelved the article dewrtbed abo%c. E ❑ Addrn ❑ Authori:rdagcvt SIGNATUR r�.:dreuee ] Authorized spent '(' 1�7Ul �,, M IL OATL • p l00r1tARlE e AOOntSaE$S tu>atTcaa tta.ry lj"rr+�+0 j ,A�u ..'.b a s.ADDAZZ EE'S ADORtU(CUD✓ +•r.fl /, J :i x r.uMAautTotatT.mRacaut� rA � �. .~•, . bs f r.JMA&A TO O"tFi SECAUee: ��F f 1 1 •SENDER.Complete items 1,2,3,and 4.� •SENDER:Complete items 1,2,3,and 4. Add your address In the"RETURN To"tp000 Add your address In ft"RE70M To"spode on Toyotas. a on tovorse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) � (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) 1.Tk following service is requested(check onc). g 1.The following service$requestcO tcbmk one). .Show to whom and date delivered._.......»»»... __� �Show to whom and date deli%rr7•t.......... »»..» ..� ❑Show to whom,date,and address or delivery.. .J ❑show to whom,date,and sddrea of da1ivar7.. _..f • 3.❑ ES RMICi'ED DELIVERY -- 3.❑RESTRICTED DELIVERY ..—f (71ir rurdcrer delint je�it rA•trerd h a"A n ar (The ersrnrNd ddive fr+it rAartd h sd>Ls«t as the fear"melpt/ml d r rrtyrn rrrrt�+�ie) TOTAL T _ _ TOTAL I 3 At3 ZSUD e. ME OF"RY1Cer ARTICLE hums en a• ME OF SARVICer Wo tANDIA ❑REOriiEAED ❑coo ❑IIEOISTERED ❑MIWRWL • EXPRESS UAL DCOD 7 0IFA� � (�•SMUF9O ❑c V-� (Always obtain signature of addressee or ag"A) hway so etas 1 have received the uncle described above. (Always obtain signature of addrtaae4 tx egeM) 1 have received the article Aewnbed above. SltlNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized! — SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Autl}CdtWsnt DATt (RY PosTwuet s. p� o ! R AODR[saEtee AtIORtsi IU.ri d«rFa+dl I e.ADWII:UM-1 ADW114(MIS Y J%� ly r r-r•�\1 J ►.USIASI&to oUMA stcAtssttr Tt trMtiOY[A a T.UZZ To OkUM"CAUS& Fa Y Q r `KrP*x i ` •SENOFA C-:nplsla items 1.2,3,and 4. ,R ! Add your address in die"RETURN TO"s as a •SENDER:Complete items 1, 3,and 4, on nnerse. i Add your address In the"RETURN TO"space on reverse. (CONSULT PORTMASTER FOR FEES) b Tl,a following service b requested(chick one), � (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) I-The following service it requested(check one). Show to whom and date delirrral._.,._ ,...».. ..� (8 Show to whom and date delivered................... .....0 ❑Show to whom,date.and address of delivery« ../ ❑ Show to whom,date,and address of delivery- _C &.❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY (Thr .rrrirreidrtfivischv rdinsdAgast* t.❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY .._C tM rri+rrrt mr(pt/he) (T11r nunrrrd drlrnry/ir u rAerjrd/a ad/lrt-a sec the nrrrr nrrip/w.) i • coral, s Total, Z____ I 7Lrz C yZ�oy f a a, irnt Of SERYOM AJInat mumwA 9 �� l7r 1 ❑R[OLtT[RED ❑NttV11t1] � a. TYPE Of SERYKEt AnTICLE NVIEata r o; �'� Qcvtlwjw 13coo JJ SJO 6 7 ❑AMST[RED []tVSURED ❑EufR[:S MAe ®ctRMEn ❑coo _40 y (Always obfaln signature of addressee or agent) EarRESS/CAM t have rexivcd the snide 6acn a t» (Always obtain signature of addressee or ag"t" t have received the article described above. SIGNATURE Addrexsce rthortztd apaat SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent MT � w i r1DSTt�llrtR E' GATE of t7EL1YtA�jr`_ R ADORESSEEI ADOMI liar;✓rry►rrwtt F.UKMU TO OVJM aaCALGL- IL E Wtirt .3 t'IIS1hLa r.04AILE TO WUVER HCAVW Is.WOLUT—M 1WhAL3 _ 1 •SENDER:Complete Moms 1,2.3,and 4. O SENDER:Complete itoms 1.2.3,and 4. Add you addioss in the"RETURN TO"space Add your address In the"RETURN TO"space Yt On ra"(SO. On reverse, s- (CONEJLT POSTMASTER MASTER FOR FEES) (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) t.71w following service is requested(check one). $ t.The following service h requests!(check ow). 5hjw to whom and date delivered.................... _.,;: Q Show to whom and date detlrrrrd................... _...0 t ❑ Show to whom,dat4 and address of delivery.. ❑Show to whom,date.and address of delivery.. ---e 1.❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY ._c 2.0 RESMICTED DELIVERY ' (ne restricted deh►rrylet 4 eAcrrrd in ad 144 at (at restricted dr6xryjK 4 ch&V f At sdfitim w the arum rrd(pf Jrt) rAe mum rrsrlpt1m) 1 TOTAL i TOTAL S � i AnISI,E A ' 1Eff &AMICIE�L� F i 3 f � -►yc 37d z �79 qi��o TYPE OF aEANCEt ARTICLE NlCAUR NL TIrP ++'.RYlClt RRT1Cl[NUM1GJi f El ItrotstEREo L7 HsuREa p ❑REOtt:TEAW 0 VIZ M /f t B cePirwao [)coo .�6/ O � 1 QCEATIFIED E j cos a ❑EiMEt3 MAL ❑Ex•nEss Mas. rtl (Always obtain signature of addrestaa or ao*M) (Always obtain signature o1 eddresseo or spent) 1 I have received the arncle described above" 1 have recelvcd the article descnh.d above. SIOHAT Addressee ❑ Authoritcd anent SIQHATURS ❑ Aadrealwlc• ❑ Antharis�eyd agent } 7 cs . Lr { c �A E Y P*sTMa]itr • zee 1 �� = t} s.A01NIM I,Ar;Dnla31n.1ptf rhood). { AO:ttEDSt OAt>OFI96t0+JlIJ fS��D l r.UK404 TO MUM HCAUM Ta.I T.UKMU TO MUYEA 1196AM ElmMlfft#!� sS Ic � MOM Complete Itonq 1 2.3,atxl 4. r~ `t O SENDER:Complete items 1 2.3.and 4. Add your addreta{Ct tM"RETURN TO"apses Add your address in the"RETURN TO"apse on reverse. on reverse. + r• r (CONSULT POSTMASTTR FOA FEES) � (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) t.The following service is requested(check oat). 1.The following service Is requested(check oae), Show to wheat and dale delivered. ....... . ..._ _t: K Show to whom and date delivered.................. ❑Show:o whom.dabs.and address of delivery.. —t ❑ Show to whom,date,and address of delivery. t.❑ RESTRICTED DELiVGItY _t' 1.0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY IAA theta rm{pt/reg fer lr rAeva h S&Itin w (the nurirUd deh.t7'fry a c4egwd N ddi*x Ar r+te KfYrn►rtrfpr lit) TOTAL =__._ TOTAL ti_,-- 1 Ca3t�24'i+"i,�7 1 ME A,^' aSA TA i • � �'S'Zlfi' h . . 3�8 r .: fZb tf3 tL 1`111 OP"AYICQN p#TXX[Nuumn Tint a. TYPE OF SEAVICCI ARTICL!HUM99A ❑REOISTEAED rJaNita w ❑REtltSTEREO ow,u►tea REWARIS MA n COO ' V 06✓9 � �1PRESSRkwirwDMAI©COO (Always obtain signature of Addressee or agent) Q (Always obtain slgnature of addressea or Dgent) i I ve i the ankle described above. 1 have received the article described a�ve. 8 ❑ Addrrum- ❑ Aathodited ascot SIONATURRi ❑ m-see ❑ Aut�hor`ited agent f or OCUMPY aATE of De t:• , � 2 s tr' CT ' � a Aat:REstatn Axa1a totiY✓�r.�..rl t�.'� .9�' � � a Aa�eEsscte AoonEss 1wy✓.rp.r„rl �� �nd ,..y i T.t1HAaL1";oe4tYCA afiCAVGC+ Ta .r r.tltaaeLE TO C1XtYEn E3 t:Atllet 7a aMltOt EE 3 s ��/✓/'% lNfp O SENDER:Complete items 1"2 3, O SENDER:Complete Items t,2,3,and A. Add your addms t jn the"R c1URN TO"spaco Add your addre.sin tt•,o"RETURN TO"spme i Le on reverse. It on rtr+arse. R (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) Q (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FELZS) t.The following service Ia requested(check oae). t.The following service is rcquemcd(check one). ,Show to whom and dsic delivered.................... __i ®Show to whom and date delivered............ , j ❑Show to whom,date,and addrezt of dcUvery.. _,_i' ❑Show to whom dete,and addtaw of daliv".. i s.❑ RI:STRICfED DELIVERY —C t.❑RESTRICTED DELIVERY --t (?At rrrrrlrrrd drrrry/rr U rAoeaw/Ar addaAm rr IThe rbar14 k 0A*iiO4 Of the roam nrripr frr) at valor rwosjra) TOTAL s TOTAL '� Armor s uE A �+r�Eo�TWW�d 'At �� Ad 3 Cam/ 'IµP C TYPE OF UAViCt'.s ARttt�XUAIWA a. TYPE OF aEAVICer AIUKU W111c ft ❑REatfTEAEO QRratAttD r []REDt3TERED �]MJSUR[� �vo r q R)CEATW' 0,DIPRlas MALQcos YAfA3 ®cERtIFiEO ❑cot! 40 [)EXPAE! MAL r rgAltyaya obtain signature of eddreasae tx spent) 44 (Alweys obOln signature of addmiree or sprit) l' 1 have rra,ved the article desctikd above. L I hays received.he article dewnbed shove. SIGNATURE ❑ Addreux ❑ Arlhurucd agent r"s SIGNATURE ❑ A/ddreuc�e. 1 1D!Autha.tzsd agent AATZ T i►. TMAfn a T[CF My PoiTWU�et .i .. � r � ., e.Arc7il:�LX9%�aRti3tai.;�r�.;arl► Jt • T.UX%&E TO OIUM WGAW �`L 81 10VEE'3 F.MAW Te Deuvas ItiCAUft to tNes�OV r 31 FSENDER:t onVIIIe items 1 Z 3,and I. O•SEf1DER:Complete items 1,2,3,and 44Add your addtasaW the"RETURN TO"'space Add your aftess In the"RETURN Ta"apw* Cri.averse. on reverse, (CONSULT POSTtIASTEn FOR FEES) Q (CONSULT POSTirlTE FOR fib)The following Price A rrqueued(check one). t.71"following wrvict Is mquntcd(check one). 10 Show to whom and date delivered.......»....... . ..._0 Show to whom and date delivered.--.—... -_.I ❑Show to whom,date,snd address of dtlivery.. —C Show to whom"date.and addrra or&JIvery.. ...1 a.❑ RESfRiCTEDDELIVERY _d :I.LJ RESTRICTED DFILIVERY ._.0 (TAt Prurrrred drh,ry jrr rr rAa'trd in 44w-r a (far ntrrl'W drllerry jn 4 rAar:r l h rrdli'daa ar dir rrrLm rm:yY jrr.) da rrrrrn hwr�r./+s) TOTAL Ii-- . -- TOTAL It �i A� AI aRttLYD Td S ^ a TTPa OF C[Avtt t AATICLt Hurlim a. IYPH OF URVICar AgflGt•E WAAKA ON (Q��''�'1tGtytTe'tF-0� QCO,+A[D J,i�4 �� Aci%trilb ❑COD (;:I L (J ( r..r tiPRtsa MAL Q W MEts MAL / - 1 I -- (Malay*obtain Ngnatury of addressee or agent) "� (Alsvoys obtain 914l►,tture of address**or agw" I have tectived the article dewnbed above. 1 have teceivetl the article described above, SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee Cl Authorized agent SIGHATI.IRE ❑ Addrusce ❑ Authorized spot t WE OF OSUMI ~� av6nt A f CAT[ • - ell, �� e.ALonE Aa7RLlata/r✓rry�eiw) aAr101tRso:tsAb t7et t/rep.rr� A r.l7ssatt TO MYlA eECAUM ra ttAaLay[Es I,Mau..TO OLWvttt t WAL4ai: IL E1111001IMM iRmALS V rlw II, . �,I t Vt I St r1itF:A compkta a ,s, J. •SENDER:Complete(lem�1,Z 3.and 4. 40 Add your address in 1ho"RETURN TO""Co i 0 441 rout n in a"A LTIf RN TO-seam on t . 7 ,. r st on reverse. nvelsa 1. 11t Oma•{nd ter.i:e uetted(check one.) (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) +how,to whoa an �y, 11vcrt-l...........—....t � 1.The following service is requested(check one). j f3 Show to iahum.date dress of de1}vcq:.._.,t Show to whom and date delivered..........._... .._.0 [J RMRICTED DELIVERY 0 Show to whom,dale,and address of delivery.. __...0 Show to whoa,s.sd date delivered............—t 2.D RESTRICTED DELIVERY 1 d WTRicrw DEuvERY. (The restrirred delirtq/et[t elursed in eddltita to !,haw to whom,date,and addretn of d-.Itvery.S_..r the rervrn ren pt fie.) (Cogs fi`art:it f o1:1"fss) X. TOTAL t ARTICLE b tfE[D TDt`, 2 r ttLE AD7CSEb:CD Tot Lee oll i n5 "s 3504 E. Century Boulevard x i vlL,-!A--gD2.6� 0-5 t. TYPE Of SFJIYIcBt AIITICLE NUMBER ANT1t:lE OCaCRtI710H: i I+EtitS/tRCb/.b Croiti/..+DHit 1N32)gF.DNJ. �llllwxo� �Colp� 7(d6 462266 0EXPRES[ MAIL ib (Always obtain Ognaturn of addrlrarN ae ap.n1) a 1 have received the(Always obtain alQnaturl Df[addressee Dr apt+nt) I have reo-hed the utkle described about, oracle 4escttbeti above. c [IONATURI �e OAathadcred saeas o SIGNATURE El Addressee El Authorized agent .�,� r L ��i • z...� zDATE orD[LIY[RY t04TUARIt Co OAT!Of DELIVERYrO�tTSfAlw(. —�=--'� t..r tL AOMESUEV AOORE!!(A/y 1/rrT.eeadl! • i7 F. AbORELi I..aaWsta arty M rrawstd) b (• A ~ I, LRYAII[TO O.LIVER X1CAtltls CLERK's �'-mn� r.LRWLE TO VWJWR SEGAUiC Ta.&UP OYYM INITLAVI O t A_ f• P' �www.rrr, w..�� PO r tail'1,1a aNS Campble terms 1.2.and 2. 0 SENDER: Comple44 Item 1,2,and]. � 1j Add Yaw addnsl m ttta"MEWILH TO.rPua ca Add your Wism In tho"A1:7VRA To"ep"an n•ata_ ter,_ arena ' .. 1. Th_&,j&Uouin j orrice Is re lursteJ(check ono.) I, The_ uwVj seMce ft tequetteJ(check one.) i E Shah to whom and ditt delivered............�—t Ld Show to urban and date delivered............�t 0 Show to whom,date and address of deUvery.-.—,.--t � 0 Show to whom,date and adduts of Whcry..._.t 0 Rm-:CTW DELIVERY ,o O RESTRICTED UELIVCRY 44'1ow to wham and dots d:ttrere ............—t o Show to wrhun and date deUveroJ........... t i] RESTRICTED DELL'" ,- 0 RGS RICTED DELIVERY. Show t,.•+hom,&tr,and 14d:eu of dalieery.s. Show to whom,data,and address of dellvety.j_.._. (CONSULT pos-n1ASTER FOR FETES) (CONSULT POSnIASTER FOR FEES) i i X ARTICL hOD"ESSID TOt t ARTICLE ADOREUED 7Di I� S •L M/M Zweibel `Glt`'� 231�- South Gale, Beverly bills jl(a��4 90211 1� S, ARTICI!OtiCR11T10Nt n X ARTICLE DESCRIPTION, R[Gtsurtap No. C[RTIFIED NO. IN1iU1110 NO. r^ 111101ETIRED NO, I cEnwitd EM. I I wnrD NO. 462265 1A�t D (Always obtain li"tuta of ddr+rae or egentl D (Ahtrays obtain sipnalury of addressaa w agant) I have ttcehcd the alucle described above. M 1 have received the ankle described above. .�„ Ito A e CIA %pral O aIGNATUR[ DAidie ee DAtlthtrited&psi w a. 7WA� .♦0 LI tR DATE OF C1.� I. m t �� !. OREtts( only N rassutsadi [. ADORE=(C-040"only 0 rqui WI .E.14+ —. L UNADLE T'J DELIVEII DECAUa[1 [. UrtABL[TO DELIVER DECAUStt\ • �J .a C KTs ItirTIALS t2 �``•.._--INITIALS r r0 ' r 0tiF7t+2at8t[ G►O 1 I alY Saa Rai 1 PRELIMINARY I DRARJ FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT May, 1982 I ft � 1 ; I II i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 SUMMARY 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 7 4.0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, MITIGA"PION MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS 7 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 16 6.0 SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS 16 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS 17 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS 17 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 18 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 18 APPENDIX A, Li—GAL DESCRIPTION 19 ' APPENDIX 61 INITIAL STUDY 20 i i I ' i 1.G SUMMARY The proposed project consists of adoption of a proposed P.-,development Plan for the 30-acre Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. The purpose of the plan is to remove ar.isting blight and improve the physical and Lconomic we'l-being of the City of Huntington Brach. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, if owners in these parcels are desirous of participating In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would bs- the displacement (oxcept for owner participants) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency'st (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value, (2) Initiating such negotiations as soon rs practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Flan, (3) providing relocation advisory as!:istan,:e and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated aad sufficient time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and its activities. Although the Impact of relocation could be negative, Its long-term impact is expected to be positive In that relocation will afford residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The impact from project Implementation on surrounding neighborhoods is also expected to be positive over the long term. Construction of modern well-planned industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic Impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing blighting influences will be irradicated from within the Project Area. } Although the project will afford substantial benefits to the community over the long term, It i:, poasible that in the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the Project Area could erporience certain negative imparts during the construction period resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise end dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the impact of dust. Over the long term, positive impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result in development of modern and well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the total social and economiz- vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. As presently envisioned, it Is the desire of the Agency to construct approximately 470 now residential, ;,enior and multi-family units and to create npnroximately 100,000 square fe..; of new light industrial development over the some time period. The total value of improvements Is expected to exceed $35,000,00Q. I ' Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately five residences. The precise layout of new development, phasing and level of activity is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, environmental evaluation will be conducted If required by C.E.G?.A. The generalized Impacts of an additional net 470 residential units and a net 100,000 square feet of new industrial development Is discussed in further retail In this report. I 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction This Focused Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared pursuant to r the State EIR Guidelines for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment. Plan. This EIR Is intended to provide decision makers with useful Information on the Impact of I the proposed Redevelopment Plan prior to adoption of the plan by the f Huntington Beach City Council. Individual projects undertaken In Implementing the proposed Redevelopment Plsrn will be subject to further environmental evaluation in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 2.2 Pra ect l_oration The proposed project is located in the City of Huntington Beach approximately 26 mile southeast of downtown Los Ang9les (refer to Figure 1). The proposed Tolbert-Beach Redevelopment Project as selected by the Huntington Beach City Planning Commissic-n consists of approximately 30 acres as shown in Figure 2 and as 1e al! described in Appendix A. 9 9 Y PP 2.3 Project Obiectivr,s As Outlined In the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the objectives are to: Eliminate blighting influences, including deteriorating buildings, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public improvements, obsolete structures and other physical, economic and social. deficlencies; Improve the overall appearance of existing buildings, streews, parking areas and other fn:ilitles, public and private; and assure that all buildings, now rind old, are safe for parsons and businesses to occupy. - Encouraging existing owners, bu3inessas and tenants within the Project Area to participate In the redevelopment activities, thus sustaining the existing Industrial base. - Providing adequate parcels and required public improvementb rro as to encourage new construction by private enterpriser thereby providing the City of Huntington Bench with an improved economic base. i . IV { ♦ rf mat. '� ?i Ori I Q=� —4- is wa•►sffr t' • s w .•f a O •icy. f.V —Ts sea pwltlt" f • f t ar�ta pro.." C.. Why • a ► 0• f f S 4..Yt • 0 ,a. taa.a►t O a✓...C.no •rra.a '•�. f ~ � i s ' aQ'« tea•. •` !� \ raw..• i �.t.r.f• .4M J ti O 1 u•ra rw�t.0 9' qwOSS : Qur.fatt _ to Y .. ►M.F.r.o 1 i r p :i*s A?No L S •' wuti aye ' ` f «"t• ��:w.sS GR/!IG£ G"UNTV •fq -! $Mir-rx ST { vp t'" WAN" M. f.a ar.. »s~•,:.i••ya.[ayr \V • tM�r. { ra•w eta. Q .r 91 O •aactars a..r•ep ?I „f ,n rfrrfH agoc..O ' �y=.7.. �•�� Vy�'D�J is rf: IL .a�. i STaf' lt[i[ ... •.. ». rcd unc h f OR "ry. � � t•G•• 22 CgG/A�/�aC i•jtf asrs w t u.fa J ay •,` /� v ry �Z •r rVft.. ftfrl.i i � `�•' �w` ��. cv All c MINE VICINITY MAP `�`' •; • • � • �� it M Ktt+Yiti7 of s HUN TINGTON BEACH FIGURE 1 111164Jt t I"1�.._..._•�•.J •.i..i� ti.•i.Jr..r 1�. �r. . •w.J..J > N..J•. iw. ... A.. .x w .R. J•.Jr.A.JY A.1%.«.x x'NO, : .�..,%..�..�.i;.x.� . It .r •. .ar..r.r..r..a1x Al IN. t, «�N.,.� ! w.w.w..w•w.••. ..�.....♦..r •r. Y¢•1y.1�.M.M-.M ���YYY���,,, • •# .w.n. ..A .�.h.w.A.r..V.A.•..A.AV.N A.1r..w.'7r:Il.I.A* i .rr..w.w.:,@O o }} w.w.w.w�w.w.J..:•.jft •.bm.J. Jr.w..A 1•�. • •t .A.w.A.r .•.•M•.=A.7r.A.M.1••I-�.••. r/..K•►..r►.iti.r. r��r....���II • • •N.lr.p•w Y..K.w•A.1..i.,lw•A,.r w.x IR.01.30.i.i.JArAriw �.R.i••.••• • .•••, �,�• •••••.. ..w. r. • •• • w•No. JL i.. w .r •.•. . Mr ll� T&SEAT-MACH PRMC T FIGURE 2 .4- Mitigating development limitations which have resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that they y constitute a serious physical, social and economic burden on the 3 community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. » Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cnrinot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. Providing construction and employment opportunties in the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed industrial facilities. Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development and to correct existing environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displaced, In accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. 2.4 Project Implementation To implrment the proposed project., the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Is proposing the following activities within the Talbert-beach Project Area: - Acquisitlun and sale of property. I - Participation by owners and tenants through the improvement of their properties or through other opportunities to participate In this or other redevalopment projects. - Relocation assistance to displaced rzsidential and. nonresidential occupant an. required by law. - Development of better parking, landscaping and public improvement concepts and facilities. - Demolition, clearance of properties acquired, provide public Improvements, building and site preparation. - Other actions as appropriate, including, but riot limited to, actions to assist property owners, businesses and tenants in the Improvements of their properties to curry out the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. -5- The land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities and building intensities and standards which are proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area are generally as follows: 2.4.1 Land lases - Industrial. Principal uses would include light manufacturing, fabrication, production and asa imbly, wholesale, distributive and office/warehouse uses. - Residential. Primarily medium to high density residential uses including condominium development and senior citizen rental units. - Community Facilities. New streets will be developed and existing streets will be imps-oved when feasible. 2.4.7 Principal Streets Principal streets within the Project Area will be the existing street system. Local street improvements will be Installed for each particular development. 2.4.3 Population Densities Population densities will conform to the General Plan as follows: 7-15 dwelling units per gross acre for Medium Density Residential development and 25+ dwelling units per gross acre for High Density Residential development. 2.4.4 Building Intensities All industrial and residential uses throughout the Project Area shall conform to or exceed minimum standards of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and the finial Redevelopment Plan approved and adopted by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. 2.4.5 Standards Minimum standards for the Project Area Include current specifications for public works construction, building codes, zoning and subdivision regulations and all other applicable local, county and state regulations. i 2.5 Project Duration I Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegre.lation provisions which shall run In perpetuity, the provisions of this plan shall by effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this plan by the City Council. Eminent ` Domain proceedings shall be limited to 12 years from adoption of the plan. � -6- 3.0 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT The existing environment for the City of Huntington Beach Is well documented i In the: Huntington Beach General Plan, the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce Community Profile, the Huntington Beach Miscellanenus Historical Data and several previous environmental Impact reports all of which are an file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. G*0 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MITIGATION MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE EFFECTS �. This section of the Focused Environmental impact Report will examine the general Impacts of the proposed Redevelopment Project and the more specific Im—cts of that type of development/redevelopment that Is presently envisioned by the Agency. As previously Indicated, Individual projects that are Implemented over the next several years will be subject to further environmental evaluation In accordance with C.E.Q.A. I' 4.1 General Impacts or Redevelopment As stated In the Preliminary Flan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project, the general Impact upon the residents of the Project Area and on the surrounding neighborhood will be beneficial because (1) blighted areas will be replaced or rehabilitated, (2) relocation of residents when necessary will be In compliance with local and state regulations, and (3) there will be an upgrading of certain public lands and structure. The proposed development will result in the loss of existing open land. However, as described above, this loss would not c constitute a significant impact as the development will be consistent with present zoning and the anticipated uses will be beneficial to the community. In addition to these items discussed in the Preliminary Plan, the Proposed Redevelopment Plan will beneflcia!ly impact the Project Area by: - Providing additional affordable decent, safe and sanitary housing to the existing stock within the City of Huntington Beach. - Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to encourage now construction by private enterprise, thereby providing tho City of Huntington Heach with a stranger economic base. - Mitignting development limitations which havo resulted In the lack of proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it causes a serluus physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. Providing construction and employment opportunities In the development of new housing and Industrial facilities and by providing employment apportunities In the operation of new Industrial facilities. 1 —7— Implementing the construction or reconstruction of a., equate streets. curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains and other Improvements as necessary to maintain the Project Area as a master-planned development. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted reuses within the Project Area In accordance with modern competitive development practices. The Redevelopment Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the assemblage and sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelcpment Agency. However, If owners In thuse parcels are desirous of participating In the project, such participation will be encouraged In conformance with the Redevelopment Plan. The most direct Impact to property owners within the Project Area would be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. This Impact will be largely attenuated with the Agency's.- (1) taking deliberate steps to negotiate the purchase price of properties to be acquired at fair market value*, (2) initiating such negotiations as soon as practical both prior and subsequent to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, (3) providing relocation advisory assistance and benefits to all who are displaced and are qualified for benefits, (4) ensuring ample time for purchase of property to be negotiated and sufficient time after to consummate the process of relocation, and (5) keeping all concerned continuously apprised of the Agency's progress and its activities. Although the impact of relocation could be negative, Its long-term Impact Is expected to be positive in that relocation will afford residences in the Project Area a unique opportunity to move to a more desirable location of their choice with little or no capital outlay necessary from personal cash resources. The impact from project implementation on surrounding nelghborhoods is also expected to be positive over the long term. Development of modern, well-planned Industrial and residential developments will provide an economic and aesthetic Impetus to the surrounding areas. Furthermore, In achieving such development, existing hllghting Influences will be lrradicated from within the Project Area. " Under Eminent Domain Law (1263.320), fair market value of the property taken Is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to loll but under no articular or urgent necessity for so doing, or obliged to sell and a P 9 Y 9� 9 buyer, being ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity fcr im doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of ail the purposes for which the t property Is reasonably Adaptable and available. When the Agency purchases property, It usually will pay cash. This Is of additional benefit to potential displacees when compared to today's "creative financing" type of transaction, where the seller usually ends up receiving monthly payments on a part of their equity. Sellers usually have one additional your to purchase comparable properly before they are required to pay capital gains tax, because mist redevelopment transactions, while negotiated, are still subject to eminent domain. -3- mow. I Althnugh the proj:,:t will afford substantial benefits to the community aver the long term, it Ir. possible that In the short term existing neighborhoods surrounding the F'roject Area could experience certain negative Impacts during the construction )erlod resulting from heavier truck traffic, noise and dust. However, these impacts will be mitigated by confining construction and trucking activities to daylight hours and by requiring spray watering as necessary to control the Impact of dust. Over the long term, positive Impacts to surrounding neighborhoods will result In development of modern and r well-designed facilities which will have eliminated the blighting conditions of the Project Area while enhancing the tntel social and economic vitality of the City of Huntington Beach. 1 Thu proposed redevelopment of the Project conforms to the Huntington Bench General Plan. The proposed land uses of the Redevelopment Plan conform to and greatly enhance the Implementation of the General Plan and its goals and objectives lowhich have guided the development of the City since Its adoption. 4.2 Specific Impacts of Presently Envisionnd Redevelopment Activities As presently envisioned, It Is the desire of the Agency to construct, or cause the construction of, approximately 470 new residential units and to assist In the 1 creation of approximately 100,000 square feet of new Industrial development. The total value of Improvements would be approximately $35,000,000. Based upon this proposed activity and the condition of existing housing, the Agency anticipates the relocation of approximately five residences. The precise location of new development, phasing and level of nativity Is Impossible to predict at this time. As development proposals come before the Agency, Individual environmental evaluations will be conducted as required by C.E.O.A. The generalized Impacts of on additional net 470 residential units and n net 100,000 square feat of now industrial development can be summarized as follows: f *Resideitinl - 470 Units 3,000 vehicle trips da t - P per Y increase ! - 650 parking spaces Increase ' 70,000 gallons of sewerage per day Increase - 90,OOn gallons of water per day Increase 1,500 pounds of solid waste per day Increase - 200 potential maximum student Increasn *Industrial - 100,000 Square Feet - 400 vehicle trips per day increase 275 parking spaces Increase - 7,000 gallons of sewerage per day Increase j - 10,000 gallons of water per day Increase - 500 pounds of solid waste per day increase * Estimates have been prepared by Michael Wagner and Associntes using standard usage factors for the proposed land uses. i _g- • .. ti 4. i A population increase of 700 will probably require the addition of approximately .5 firemen and related equipment, .8 policemen and related equipment, may require additional educational facilities and may require the addition of sewer and water facilities. Many of the costs for providing Increased services could be provided by the Redevelopment Agency. It is anticipated that some changes will be required in the traffic and circulation system, the water and sewer system and in the solid waste management system. The proposed project would generate about 1,600 pounds of emission per day. More detailed information will be required prior to Implementation of Individual development projects. Although It Is Impossible to project specific activities, it Is presently envisi%,ned that Agency assistance will be required to implement up to 300 senior units, up to 170 apartment/condo units and up to 100,000 square foot of light Industrial development. 4.3 Mitigation Measures The proposed Redevelopment Plan is a means to mitigate the impact of blight In the Project Area and Improve the social, environmental and economic conditions In the City. While the project is beneficial, minor adverse impacts may occur. The following list of mitigation measures are offered at this stage of the rede,#eloprnent process: 4.3.1 Future development will be constructed In accordance with provisions of the Uniform Building Code which governs construction relative to selt'mic movement. Onsite grading and earth removal will be performed to the satisfaction of the Huntington Beach Building Code. Grading, soil, compaction, erosion of soils, geologic hazards or similar hazards will be governed by the proper engineering standards and controls of the City of Huntington Beach. No unusual mitigating measures beyond the regular controls of the City are proposed at this time. 4.3.2 Air As mitigating measures, the Agency will encourage Improved circulation, the extension and improvement of major arterials, bus and carpool usage, energy conservation, bike routes, paths and open space and grien areas. 4.3.3 Water Development as proposed by the Redevelopment Plan will create nn additional demand for water. The anticipated demand for water can be accommodated by the existing major water lines. However, higher intensity development may require expanding capacity and improving local street mains. An analysis of additional water line capacity will not be undertaken until a mure specific Indication of actual site development plans occur. No specific mitigation measures are proposed at this time. i I f 1 e, t 4.3.4 Plant Life The project will remove no significant vegetation since none Is in existence. Landscaping will negate the impact of providing an urban land use on currently vacant and redeveloped property. Landscaping Is anticipated to be in excess of City standards. 4.3.5 Animal Life The Project Area is not known to be a significant animal (or wildlife) habitat. Landscaping of the project Area at the time of redevelopment can be expected to enhance a suitable habitat for birds associated with urban areas. 4.3.6 Noise Noise levels in the vicinity of the Project Area are not expected to Increase significantly. Normal construction of building Is anticipated to provide a minimum outside-to-inside attenuation of 22dBA which will reduce the Inside noise to a level approaching 45dBA. No additional mitjgation measurers beyond the requirements of the Uniform Building Coda and the City's Noise Ordinance will be required. Noise from traffic within the Project Area will be reduced because of Agency/City Improvements to road surfacing, traffic control equipment and removal of mixed land uses. In addition, implementation of Section 27.160 (a) of the Cr.lifornla Vehicle Code for auto and truck manufaL-turers will result In a decrrlase in noise levels from engines and tires; by 1967 all vehicles mua be at Levels below 70 dBA. 4.3.7 Light and Glare I Landscaping will "soften" the visual impact of the possible light and glare r resulting from the redevelopment of the Project Area. Landscaping plans for enih redevelopment proposal will be prepared by developers for approval by the Hu?tington Beach Redevelopment Agency and the City Council. The City will also exercise sign control and architectural control over the n.:w development In the project Area. 4.3.0 Land Uue As previously stated, the land uses of the Project Area are proposed to be redeveloped to mitigate blighteed conditions. Future residential development wili be buffered from adjacent dbvelopments to mitigate any potential conflict from adjacent uses. I 4.3.9 Natural Resources Wherever feasible, existing structures and Improvements that nr a scheduled for demolition will be recycled to conserve on the comumption of natural resource. i 4.3.10 Risk of Upset No significant hazard of explosion or hazardous substances is anticipated. No I' mitigation measures are proposed at this time. -11- 4.3.11 Population It is doubtful that the additional population growth caused as a result of this project will be substantially great enough to create a significant adverse impact to the City. With regard to the displacement of persons and families, relocation assistance will be provided. - Relocation Assistance. The Agency shall assist all persons (including families and others) displaced from the project by the Agency in finding other locations and facilities. Should acquisition of occupied residences be necessary to carry out the project, persons displaced from their homes shall be Assisted by the Agency In finding housing that Is decent, safe and sanitary; within their financial means; in ^easonably convenient locations; and &s otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency Is authorized to provide housing Inside or outside the Project Area for those persons displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. - Relocation Payments. They Agency shall make relocation payments to persons including families and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses for which reimbursement or compensation Is not otherwise made. In addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs incurred in the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make every effort to relocate individuals and familles. Tem orary Relocation Housing. The Agency is authorized to provide temporary relocation housing an cleared sites within the Project Area. Such action by the Agency will be to provide additional safe, standard and decent relocation housing resources for families and businesses within the Project Area prior to permanent disposition and development of such cleared sites. If fusible r 'd desirable, the Agency may also utilize sites outside the Project Area for providing relocation housing resources. The j ' Agency Is also outhorizeJ to provide temporary relocation housing In houses acquired by the Agency that are being held for sale and/or rehabilitation. 4.3.12 Housing. Not less than 20 percent of all taxps which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of Increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined In the Health and Safety Code Section 41056, and very low households, as defined in Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to improve or Increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income households; or -12- Ji - That some stated percentage, less than 20 percent, of the taxes which are I allocated to the Agency pursuent to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet isuch housing needs; or That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community Is being made, and that this effort including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate Income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, is equivalent In Impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate income or very low income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of Implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. 4.3.13 Transportation/Circulation Redevelopment will assist in correcting interior circulation resulting In i improved traffic flow and prjvide improved access and additional parking. i 4.3.14 Public Services No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, additional manning of such services as fire protection, building inspections and police protection, etc. will be necessary to maintain the some level of service that now exists. 4.3.15 Energy The following energy conservation measures are recommended for the new structures: ` - Use of as much solar and alternate energy as Is feasible. ill - Open gas lighting should not be used In public or private buildings. - Electric lights should be strategically placed to maximize their efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. - E;ectrical heating In public and private structures should be discouraged. Solar assisted heating systems should be encouraged. Reflecting and/or insulating glass should be used in structures where windows are not shaded by exterior architectural projections or mature plants. 4.3.16 Utilities No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. -13- I 4.3.17 Human Health No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. However, It should be noted that human health conditions for Huntington Beach residents will be Improved by being relocated Into housing that is docent, safe and sanitary. 4.3.18 Aesthetics Architecture and landseeping site plans will be approved by the City. » Incompatible Uses. No use or structure which by reason or appearance, traffic, smoko, glare, noise, odor or similar factor would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted In any part of the Project Area. Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels. Parcels In the Project Area, Including any parcels retained by a participant, will nut be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. Limitation of Building Density. The number of buildings In the Project Area will be consistent with building Intonsitler, permitted pursuant to existing local ordinances for the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings. The height, typa and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes and local zoning, building and other applicable codes and ordinances and this Plan. Where a conflict exists between such local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. Open Space, Landscaelng and Parking. The approximate amount of open apace to be provided in the Project Area Is the total of all areas which will be in the public right-of-way, the public grounds, the open space around buildings, and all other amounts of outdoor areas not permitted through limits on land coverage by the Plan to be covered by buildings. Landscaping plans where new construction occurs shall be submitted to the Agency for review and approval to ensure appropriateness and optimum use of living plant material. Within the Project Area, both public and private streets and public and private parking shall be provided for In each development consistent with or exceeding City nodes and ordinances in effect from time to time. Any private streets or off-street parking must also comply with regulations Imposed by the Redevelopment Plan. Light, A!r and Privacy, in all areas, sufficient space shall be maintained between buildings and structures to provide adequate light, air and privacy. -14- r"1 - Signs. Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearance by protruding, overhanging, blinking, flashing, showing animation or other such similar conditions shall not be permitted In the Project Area. The Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel Involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. 4.3.19 Recreation No mitigation measures are proposed at this time. 4.3.20 Archeological/Historical Should archeological artifacts be encountered during construction, a qualified Individual will be retained to investigate the significance of the Items, catalog and remove some for furtt er study and preservation. No other, mitigation measures are proposed. 4.3.21 Development Standards New Construction. All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws In effect from time to time including, but not necessarily limited to, fire, building, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. - Rehubllitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses. Any existing structures within the Project Area which most the standards for rehabilitation may be repaired, altered, reconstructed or rehabilitated, If necessary, in such manner that will meet the following requirements: o Be safe, sanitary and sound In all physical respects. Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the Building Code of Huntington. Beach. 0 Shall conform to the Fire Code for the City of Huntington Beach. 0 Shall be comparable In appearance to the architecture of the nn-site proposed new structures. 4.4 Unavoidable Effects The proposed project should improve the community's overPil economic situation and, as a result, bring about more job opportunities, Increase population and provide a higher quality of life for the residents of Huntington ©each. These factors, In turn, will place a greater demand on the City's water, sewer, power and land resources, as well as contribute to air and noise pollution. -15- I 1 i he implementation of the Plan will result in the clearance of selected housing structures, the construction of new multi-family housing and industrial buildings; the pavement of streets and parking lots; and the development of other facilities that will probably result In Increased rainfall runoff, During the course of implementing the p.%ject, there will be some temporary disruption to normal activities due to construction. Construction, as well as the provision of public Improvements, will result in the utilization of certain natural resources, such as sand, gravel, petroleum tend lumber. Implementation of the proposed Redevelopment Plan will result in the acquisition of certain property and the relocation of owners and tenants. 5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 No Project The "no project" alternative would allow the Project Area to continue In a blighted condition for can indefinite period. The application of existing federal, state and local funds Is not adequate to significantly prevent existing deterioration or to significantly improve existing conditions. 5.2 Smaller Project Area Designation of a srr•.Iler project area will not achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan or eliminate the blighted conditions. 5.3 Larger Project Area Establishment of a larger project area would require more extensive Investigation to document blighting conditions. A larger project area would not necessarily enhance the opportunity for achieving the Redevelopment Plan's objectives. 6.0 LOCAL SFIORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM EFFECTS The Redevelopment Plan Provides policy direction in the establishment of land use catngories In accordance with the General Plan. The Plan further provides for the acquisition of property, demolition and replacement of structures; relocation of some families and businesses; installation of reconstruction of streets, utilities and other site improvements; and financial methods for Implementing the project. The Redevelopment Plan is designed to provide direction for the transition from present short-term policies to the long-range goals and objectives of Huntington Beach. Many provisions of the Plan will be effective for 35 years. Not to Implement the Plan at this time would be to InWnsify the conditions of blight and deterioration that exlst within the Project Area. If implemented, the Plan would arrest these conditions over the long-term, and would help promote the economic and physical well-being of the City of Huntington Beach. -16- Concerning underdeveloped or vacant land, the long-term effects will be a loss of omen space and some resources. The Project Area will be subject to redevelopment over the planning period. Adverse effects associated with land acquisition, demolition, relocation of households and reconstruction will be mostly short-term. Based upon existing plans, the Intensity of residential development will increase and will result in additional congestion. Noise and air emissions In the Project Area would likewise Increase. 7.0 IRREVERSIBLE EFFECTS Although the project will result In the utilization of certain resources such as sand, petroleum and lumber in the construction and Implementation of Its various proposals, and will result In the commitment of some now vacant lands to urban uses, it Is unlikely that the Impacts of the Implementation of the project would result in any more adverse environmental changes than would the continued growth of the City under normal conditions. In fact, by concentrating the development and making the Improvements called for In the Redevelopment Plan, there should be less land and resources committed Irretrievably to urbanization. This project basically uses land already committed to urbanization. The environmental problems caused by the project should by mitigated by the steps outlined In this report. 8.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS The process of regional growth can be generally outlined as 3 series of events In Y casual sequence beginning with job creations The creation of now jobs then leads to job shifts and vacancies, followed by Immigration and n demand for shelter. This, in turn, Is followed by an ordering of land uses and.n shifting of the spatial configuration of the labor supply. The shifting of the location of the supply of labor Is a stimulus for the new location of business and other economic activity creating jobs ;Ind starting the growth cycle over again. The regional growth cycle constitutes the source of the demand for the constru^tion of private and public facilities. The actual physical pattern of the growth in j the City is the result of the chronological order and size In which specific parcels of land are developed. The relatively small size parce's have limited the growth and development possibilities in the Project Area. The consolidation of parcels in the Redevelopment Project Area will broaden tht possibilities for more Intense development and growth. The imp:nmentation of the }project will have n growth inducing Impact to the City by increasing the population by about 700 persons. The proposed project will expand the housing stock of the City by about 470 units and will Increase employment opportunities. -17- E 9.0 INSIGNIFICANT EFFECTS The environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study as insignificant (Appendix B) included primarily those related to land, water, plcnt and animal life, human health and archaeological/historical. These impacts were dismissed primarily because they are not affect-d by the proposed project. 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS, PERSONS AND SOURCES CONSULTED 10.1 City of Huntington Beach Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise 10.2 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Preliminary Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Pr&ct, April, 1982. 10.3 Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Proposed Redeveloment Plan, May, 1982. 10.4 Air Quality Handbook for Environmental Impact Reports, SCAG. I 10.5 Geotechnical Inputs, Leighton-Yen and Associates, February, 1974. 10.6 Scientific Resources SurvSX and Inventory,Huntington Beach, California, Archaeological Research, Inc., April 10, 1973. 10.7 Land Use Elemenii Amendment, EIR 81-6, Huntington Beach Department of Development Services. 10.8 City of Huntington Beach, James Barnes, Associate Planner. I; i I i i -18- I fI Appendix "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA I i Those portions of Sections 35 and 269 Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and Rancho Las Bolsas in the City of Huntington Beach, County of " Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follcws: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly prolongation of the west boundary line of Tract No. 172, as shown on a map recorded in Book 12, page 21, of Miscellan- eous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, and a line parallel with and 50.00 feet north measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along said mentioned parallel line 793 ± feet to the intersection with a line parallel with and 10.00 feet east measured at right angles from the east line of Lot No. 3, Block C of said mentioned Tract No. 172; thence southerly along said mentioned parallel line 300 tfeet to a point on a curve concave easterly having a radius of 273.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 1503349" an arc distance of 74.16 feet to a point on a tangent reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 327.00 feet; thence southerly along said reverse curve throu,h a central angle of 15033 49' an arc distance of 88.82 feet to a line parallel with and 32 feet east measured at right angles from the west line of Lot No. 82,, glock C, of said mentioned Tract No. 172; i thence southerly along last said mention W parallel line 250 ± feet to the inter- section with the easterly prolongation of the north boundary line of Tract No. 8197 1 as shown on a map recorded in Book 452, page 44, of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of sail County; thence westerly along said mentioned prolongation and northerly line 832 - feet to the west boundary line of said Tract No. 8197; thence southerly along said west boundary line 690 „ feet to the south right-of-way line of Taylor Drive, a street beinr, 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence westerly along said south right-of-way line 660 ± feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the east line of Parcels Nos. 7-10 as shown on a map filed in Book 79, page 15 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence northerly along said prolongation and east line 1014 : feet to a line parallel with and 335 ± feet south measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along last said mentioned parallel line 660 ± feet to the wrist line of Tract No. 172; thence northerly along said west line 385 ± feet to the point of beginning. f� I �.400A 11.111 CONTINUATNM $Mtn r"'' FILING AAMINITRATIVII RIvuLATIO Appendix "B" WITH THR MCRITARY CM ITArR (►vnvem to WnrmmM Code!eace 11340.1) 55. Appendix J is added to read: APPENDIX J w NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: 'it of Huntington Beac FROM: �Huntin9ton_. Beach Redevelo ment espona a Agency (Lea gency Ager. 2000 Main Street 2000 Main Street d resa resa Huntington Beach, California ,92648 Huntington Beach, California 9264 SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Repor The Huntington Beach Radevelo pt Aggncy will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an env ro ntal Impact report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory reaponsibilities in connection with the proposed project . Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when = considering your permit or other approval for the project . . M ' The project description, location, and the probable environmental : effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Init; Study IX is, =/ is not, attached. C Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be i sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after $ receipt of this notice . Please send your response to Tom Tincher* at the address shown above . We will nee Efie name roF a ZoRact person in your agency. PROJECT TITLE: TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAll PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE _Ali Signature t er� Title ExgcuLive Director ! Telephone 714) 536-5575 i E Reference: California Administrative Code, Title 14 , Sections 15035. 15054 .32 15066. -20- .u,..,a 1n.....[. •w 4OOA• iO1fTMCYAflON bM11? FOR FWHS 0041NISTRAM MUM MA WRM flit SKi< "Y OF itATt owww ft 0"Wom rA C"I sue►:1ma n 74.' Appendix I is Added to read: A PFINDSX I ENVIRONM VAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) I. DACKOHOUND 1. Name of Proponent Nuntin ton Beach Redevelo ment Agency 2. Address and Phone Number or Proponent: 2000 Majo StrjatZP.g. Box 190 I i 3. Date of Checklist Submitted •,,,_,May,5, 1982�.�___...r....... 4, Agency Requiring Checklist n 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Talbert Beach RedevelUme`t, Plan II. Etwl'VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanativae of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. ) YES MAYBE NO - 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: • � a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? •� 8 b. Disruptions, dieplaoementap com- paction or overeovering of the soil? �X c. Change ih topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Mh e. Any increasi in wind or water erosion of voile, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach cande, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bad of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X .., . -21- .. .: nw 400A COHI 1UAVICM BRUT FOA FILING AQMINISTRATIVII REOULATIONS WITH THE SICAETARV OF STATE (►r"rt h Ck"I MM I COWS soc%*d 11300.1) YES �MAYBE NO g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such ae earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air., Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _.__. X_ 3, Water; Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of rater movements, in s either marine or fresh waters? X '-` b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patteran; or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X 0 = c. Alterations to the course or 8 flow of flood waters? .. X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Xj e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration or surface water quality, including but not limited to termperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow or ground waters? X Y�•Y w�- 6. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addition.. or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cute or excavations? X i -22- + lr A..1 4ddA COMTftlYATiti'1l � � ' rOR ilUNd ADMINIMATM RIGULATIONS, WITH THE SKMARY ON STATE (ft"O"to own.*"*C.*SWN"113M) YES MAYBE. NO 0 h. Substantial redaction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X„ i. Exposure of people or property f to water related hazards such as } floodinp.: or tidal waves? X 4. Plant �Life. �"' Will the proposal result a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? _X_, ! b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X,,, a. :introduction of new opecies of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of � s existing species? X,_, d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? �c , = 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal reau n: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any specier; of animals (birds, land animals Including reptiles, fish and j shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? �... .w.... .,X... � . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species j or animals? I i c. Introduction or new ,species of i animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X -23- e r 400A J"'1 COMINUATION will ' F. . FILING ADMINISTRATIVE RIOULATIO WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE (irnveM h Ck"nw l C.d.lane 11910.0 YES MAYBE N0 6, Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise ,X levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glares Will the proposal produce new lIgt or Glare? X.M. 8. land Use. Will the proposal result in a s uMantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X g. Natural Resources. Will the propose resu tin: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? wX • !� b. Substantial depletion of any inonrenewable natural resource? , 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal 3 'i o ve a r1sR of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances S (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? __._. �__.. X 11. Po ulation. Will the proposal alter e location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? X 12. Nousin . 14111 the proposal affect ex s n,g hodsing, or create a 'Pmand for additional housing? X 13. •.. nortation Circulat� ion. Will Fie j. - -sal result in: a. Genei .- -n of substantial, addi- tional vehic moveme:lt? X 1 i a.M�oo� t'oNemur►rio« iittK ?OR AIND ADMINISTRATiV1 RSOULAYIONS `!MH THS SICSKTANY ON STAT11 (%'r.Cz110 oww wo"Cide suer&11SKI) YES MAYBE NO b. Effects on exist, j.ng parking Facilities, or demana for new parking? „ X _....., _..�, c. Substantial impact uGon exictir. transportation eyntems? X d. Alterations to present pasterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? a. Alterations to waterborne) rai2 or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic ha2ards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the pr3posal have an erree upon, or result in a need for new or altbred govern- mental services in any of the following areas: j A. Fire protection? J r b. - .Police protection? S c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X 15, Energy. Will the propoan.3 result In: a. Use of subotantial amounts of ruel or energy? X b. Substantial increave in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develoy-Y,ont of new { aourcee of energy? X f »r 400A /�+ CaM UATIOM SHUT ' K FILING AD MINISTRATIVII RIGULATI@ WITH THI WRITARV of itATI � YES MAYBE NO 16, Utilities. Will the proposal redult n a Feed for now systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: I a. Power or natural gas? X,,,, b. Communications systems? x a. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? -- d e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? X,,,, i 17. Human Health. Will the proposal resu n: J a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding . mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential = health hazards? �•• 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result n Me obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. All the .proposal result IF an mpaet upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20, Archeological Historical. Will the proposal result- in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? -26- •� i 'o�M IpbA• • ^` COMMON NOR r0A MUN, ADIIlIHIMATM ltidilLAT10M� MM TNR WMAaY Of iTATS (h""A of Of W owe SHN"Mal) N 21. (a) Doer the project have the potential E to dagrada the quality of the environment, ! substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife bpecies, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant ox -animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important w axples of the major pariods of California history or probistory? b. Does the project have the poten•- t1al to achieve short-tend, to. the dieadvAntage of long-term, envlron- ment&l goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which } occurs in a relatively brier, definitive pariod or time while ` longterm impacts will endure well into the future.) x Co noes the project have impacts which are individually limited, $ but cumulatively conaiderable? (A project may impket on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource in relatively small, but where the effect of the total or those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environ- ' mental effects which will cause substantial adve'ree effects on hwrn beings, either directly or indirectly? .r.� X._.. III. DI9 USSION OF W ROMMUL EVALUATION -27- y .rw 4o0A . � ttlltTiMUAT18i{ f1t1tT FOR SLIND ADMINISTRATIVE RIGULATIONS WITH twn SICKSTARY Of STATE f1�td N dr�++iwet CeA IieA+�11ir0.1} IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: L7 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ,7 I find that although the proposed project could gave a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT in required. Date_ ,. -.82rtl ?QA 19U- Charles W. Thomp§on gna ure x For Huntinaton Beach Redevelopment Agency o t i f I TALBERT•BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ti �.wra.� '.L+-.;y.;...-.,..->.,+ _.-r'•"' •— .-,a .....,. .. _ .. .. .. .� .-, r .. ... _.. ......._......... . .,..._.... ,._ ..... .. "".r• fir..- r ....+v..^sn.� 5 i PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 HUNTiNGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA MAY 1982 f i i f I i MYFt(;i. ..,.. Yi,\'j'�•'.Y�:. .-.....F.` "• •.. .... .. ..• .t': �. � .. ... ... a.t .��V.w 'J'... ..:.2'::"�.r•ir.• ♦. r} .X'"'S^..../`.ti,,,,�._■ TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page .0 TRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelupment Plan 1 1.2 General Definitions 1 1.3 Project Area Boundaries 2 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan 2 1.5 Duration of Plan 2 1.6 Procedure for Amending Plan 2 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan 2 2.2 Participation of Owners and Tenants 4 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures 5 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures 5 �- 2.3.2 Moving of Structures 5 2.4 Acquisition of Property 5 2.5 Relocation Assistance to DIsplaced Residential 6 and Nonresidential Occupants 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements 7 and Site Preparation 2.7 Disposition and Redevelopment of Agency g Property for Uses In Accordance with this Plan 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION g 3.1 Cooperation with Ci� g 3.2 Cooperation with Oti;,_: Public Jurisdictions 10 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area 11 z. 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements 12 3.5 Methods for Project Financing 15 1:• 3.5.1 General Description of the Proposed � Financing Method 3.5.2 Tax Increments 15 3.3.3 lc,uance of Bonds and Not' , 17 3.5.4 Loans and Grants 17 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens 17 3.5.6 Financing Limitations 1? List of Exhibits A. Redevelopment Project Area Map 19 B. Redevelopment Project Area Legal Description 20 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction to the Redevelopment Plan Prepared by the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, this Redevelopment Plan is for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project in the City of Huntington Beach. This Redevelopment Plan has been prepared pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq., the California Constitution and all applicable local laws and ordinances. The proposed redevelopment of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach adopted by the City Council and as thereafter amended. This Proposed Redevelopment Plan is based on a Preliminary Redevelopment Plan approved by the Planning Commission on April 20, 1982. f 1.2 General Definitions The following definitions will govern In the context of this Redevelopment Plan unless otherwise indicated In the text. ? "A encyll means Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, Huntington Beach, California or any successor In interest (e.g., C.D.C.). "City„ means the City of Huntington Beach, California. "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. ( "County"means the County of Orange, California. i "Legal Deseri6tinn" means a description of the land within the Project Area prepared In accordance with map specifications approved by the California State Board of Equalization kind attached hereto as Exhibit "B". time pit means the Redevelopment Plan Map for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". "Person" means any individual, or any public or private entity. i i "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project In the City of Huntington Beach, California. i "Planning Commission" means the City Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California. "Pro ect" means any undertaking of the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Law, and this Plan, or any amendments thereto. "project Area" means the area included within the bcundaries of the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project area as described on this map attached hereto as Exhibit "A"and the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit $'B". ...�VK C'• r. ..� •..-. .. .. . .n . r. w... ....e •�M Ul-f,, l ear? �" .T i 'Redevelopment Law" means the Community Redevelopment Lai of the State of California Colifornia Health and Safety Code, Sections 33000 et seq.), as amended to date. "Statall means the State of California. I "Tax Increments" means taxes allocated to a special fund of the Agency in the manner provided by Sections 33670 to 33677, Inclusive, of the Community 1 Redevelopment Law and Article XVI, Section 16, of the California Constitution. 1.3 Project Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Project Area are set forth on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The legal description of the Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit 113". 1.4 Administration and Enforcement of the Plan ; The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents Implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and/or the City. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by Other the Agency or the City. Such remedies may include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, reentry, Injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisions which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property In the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. i f 1.5 Duration of Plan Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall I run In perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective for 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council or until all outstanding indebtedness of the Agency shall be retired, whichever is later. 1..; Procedure for Amending Plan ; This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in the Redevelopment Low or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROPOSED ACTIONS 2.1 General Objectives of Redevelopment Plan In creating the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach declared Its desire to improve, upgrade, and revitalize all areas of the City and in particular those areas within the City which have become blighted 'because of deterioration, disuse and economic, physical and social maladjustments. As a Fart of the City's ongoing redevelopment efforts, the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency has prepared this Plan for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project Area. -2- i 1 Accordingly, the objectives of this Redevelopment Project are as follows: -- Eliminating blighting influences, including deteriorating buildings, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, Inadequate public e improvements, obsolete structures, and other physical, economic and social deficiencies; Improve the overall appearance of streets, parking areas and other facilities, public and private; and assure that all buildings are safe for persons to occupy. -- Encouraging existing owners, businesses and tenants within the Project Area to participate In redevelopment activities. » Providing adequate parcels and required public Improvements so as to encourage new construction by private enterprise, thereby providing 4 the City of Huntington Beach with an improved economic base. Mitigating development limitations which have resulted in the lack of proper utilization of the Project. Area to such an extent that It R constitutes a serious physical, social, and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or allevieteA by private enterprise acting alone. -. Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open j spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. Providing construction and employment opportunities in the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities In the operation of the proposed industrial facilities. f -- Implementing the construction or reconstruction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm drains, and other improvements as necessary to assist development of the Project Area to conform to the' l General Plan as a master-planned development and to correct existing j environmental deficiencies. Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted uses within the Project Area In accordance with modem and competitive development practices, thus assuring the highest design standards and environmental quality. -- Prnvidlhg for relocation assistance and benefits to Project Area residences which may be displecird, In accordance with 'the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Low and the government code of the State of California. IF To obtain the objectives of this Plan as set forth, the Agency Is authorized to undertake most or a all following ! f the f Ii Ins Implementing actions: Acquisition of property. -- Participation by owners and tenants In the redevelopment project. -3- Relocation assistanre to displaced residential occupants as required by I nw. Develnpment of adequate parking, landscaping, public Improvements and facilities. Demolition clearance of properties acquired, and site preparation. Other actions as appropriate, including, but not limited to, actions to assist property owners and tenants in the improvement of their properties to carry out the objectives of the redevelopment plan. -- Assist In providing financing for private and public development in the Project Area. 2.2 Participation by Owners and Tenants 2.2.1 Rules for Participation Opportunities and Re-Entry Preferences Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by such factors as the land uses-designated for the Project Area; the f provision of public facilities; realignment of streets if required; the ability of owners to finance acquisition and development of structures In accordance with the Plan; and any change in the total number of Individual parcels In the Project Area. In order to provide an opportunity to owners and tenants to participate In the growth and development of the Project Area, the Agency shall promulgate rules for owner and tenant participation. If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sites or land uses, the Agency shall establish reasonable priorities and preferences i among the owners and tenants. Some of the factors to be considered In establishing these priorities and preferences should include present occupancy,'participant's length of residency or occupancy in the area, accommodation of as many participants as possible, similar land use to similar land use, conformity of participants' proposals with the intent and objectives o;-' the Redevelopment Plan, ability to finance the implementation, development experience and total effectiveness of participants' proposal In providing a service to the community. Owner participant priorities shall take effect at the time that the Redevelopment Plan is adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council. In addition to opportunities for participation by individual persons and firms, participation to the extent It Is feasible shall be available for two or more persons, firms or institutions, to join together in partnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. The Agency shall upon the request of any conforming owner issue to such owner within the first twelve months after the adoption of the Plan a certificate of conformity In a form suitable for recordation with the County Recorder's Office. The Agency shall not use eminent -4- III domain to acquire property owned by conforming owners so long as use conforms to Plan. In the event that the Redevelopment flan is amended after a duly noticed - public hearing to change the requirements for the property, such otherwise conforming owners may be required to enter into an Owner-Participation Agreement with the Agency. In the event any of the conforming owners desires to construct additional Improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on any of the real property previously described as conforming, or acquire additional real property within the Project Area, then such conforming owner may be required to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the same manner as required for other owners. 2.2.2 Participation Agreements The Agency may require each participant to enter Into a binding agreement with the Agency by which the participant agrees to rehabilitate, develap, or use the property In conformance with the Plan atxi to be subject to the provisions in the Participation Agreement. In such agreements, participants who retain real property shall be required to join in the recordation of such documents as Is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan applicable to their properties. 2.3 Rehabilitation and Conservation of Structures I 2.3.1 Rehabilitation of Structures r While no rehabilitation of structures is anticipated for the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment area, the Agency will be authorized to rehabilitate find conserve, or to cause to be rehabilitated, any building or structure in the Project Area owned or acquired by the Agency. .'.I 2.3.2 Moving of Structures As Is necessary in carrying out this Plan and where it is economically feasible to do so, the Agency is authorized In Its discretion to move or cause to be moved any standard structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area and dispose of such structures in conformance with the Law and this Plan. 2.4 Acquisition of Proper Except as specifically exempted herein, the Agency may acquire, but Is not required to acquire, any real property iocated In the Project Area, by gift, devise, exchange, purchase, eminent domain, or any other lawful method. It Is in the public Interest and may be necessary In some instances, In order to eliminate the conditions requiring redevelopment and in order to execute the . Plan, for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property in the Project Area. The Agency shall commence eminent domain proceedings to acquire property within the Project Area j within twelve (12) years after the adoption of the Plan. -5- The agency is not authorized by law to acquire real property owned by public bodies which do not consent to such acquisition. The Agency Is authorized, however, to acquire private property which was formerly public property by being transferred by deed, lease, or otherwise to private ownership or control ' before the Agency completes land disposition within the entire Project Area If the Agency and the private owner do not enter into a participation agreement. t The Agency shall not at-quire real property to be retained by an owner , pursuant to a participation agreement If the owner fully performs under the agreement. The Agency is authorized to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which those structures are located. The Agency Is also authorized to acquire any other interest in real property less than a fee. The Agency shall not acquire real property an which an existing building is to be contirnled on Its present site and In its present form and use without the consent of the owner, unless (1) such building requires substantial structural alteration, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation to assure that such building is safe for people and/or businesses to occupy, or (2) the site or lot an which the building Is situated required modification In size, shape or use, or (3) It is necessary to impose upon ouch property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Plan and the owner fails or refuses to participate In the Plan by executing a participation agreement. The Agency shall define the circumstances to which this section is applicable. The Agency may, in its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real property within the Project Area and the owners of such property will be i permitted to remain as conforming owners without an owner participation agreement with the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use i and maintain real property within the requirements of the Plan. However, conforming owners may be required by the Agency to enter into an Owner 1 Participation Agreement with the Agency In the event that such owners desire to (1) construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures or any of the real property described above as conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary, In the execution of the Plan, the Agency Is authorized to acquire ` personal property in the Project Area by any lawful means, Including eminent domain. 2.5 Relocation Assistance to Displaced Residential and Nonresidential Occupants The Agency shall assist all families, Individus;., or other entities displaced by the project in finding other locations and faclUties. In order to carry out the project with a minimum of hardship to persons displaced from their homes, the Agency shall assist individuals and families in finding housing that is decent, safe, sanitary, within their financial means, in reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their needs. The Agency may provide by acquisition, construction leasing, rehabilitation, loans and grants, or other means, housing inside or outside the Project Area for displaced persons, and to meet housing replacement requirements of state law. •6- The Agency shall make relocation payments to persons (including families, business concerns, and others) displaced by the project, for moving expenses and direct losses of personal property (businesses only) for which reimbursement or compensation is not otherwise made. in addition, the Agency will reimburse owners for certain settlement costs Incurred In the sale of their property to the Agency, and make additional relocation payments to those eligible therefor. Such relocation peymentl shall be made pursuant to Agency rules and regulations and the relocation provisions of the Government Code of the State of California. The Agency may make such other payments as may be appropriate and for which funds are available. The Agency shall make an extensive effort to relocate existing re;aidential tenants within the City of Huntington Beach. 2.6 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements and Site Preparation The Agency is authorized to demolish and clear or move buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property In the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. ( If In implementing this Plan any dwelling units housing persons and families �) of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the redevelopment project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of re{.acement dwelling units at affordable rents within the Project i Area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, In accordence with J all of the provisions of Seeticns 33413 and 33413.5 of the State Health and Safety Code. The Agency Is authorized to install and construct or cause to be installed and constructed temporary public Improvements and temporary public utilities necessary to carry out the Plan. Such temporary public improvements may I include but are not limited to traffic signals, streets, and utilities. Temporary utilities may be installed above ground. The Agency Is authorized to Install and construct or to cause to be installed and constructed with the consent of the City Council of the City of i Huntington Beach the public Improvements and public utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out the Nan and to pay for part or all of the value therefor, if the City Council finds and determines (1) that such public Improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or to the Immediate neighborhood In which the project Is located, and (2) no other reasonable means of financing such public Improvements are available to the Community. Such pubiia improvements may include, but are not limited to, pedestrian walkways, �.keways, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, sewers, storm drains, traffic signals, electrical distribution systems, water distribution systems, plazas, parks and playgrounds. It Is anticipated that the Agency will construct and provide the streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street lights, underground utilities and landscaping within the public rights-of-way which are within the Project Area. -7- The Agency Is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared as building Eltes any real property it'. the Project Area owned by Lhe Agency. When the value of such land or the cost of the installation and construction of such facility, structure, or other improvement, or both, has been or wl:i be, paid rr provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter Into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimh,urse the City or other public corpoi ation for all cr part, of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such facility, structure, or other Improvement, or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. 2.7 Disposition and Recevelo ment of Agency Property for Uses in Accordance with this Plan For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency Is authorized to sell, lease, , exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any Interest in real property. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is &uthorized to dispose of real property by leases or sales by negotiation without public bidding. {' ' All real property acquired by the Agency In the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted In the Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City or any other public body without charge. Property containing buildings or structures rehabilitated by the Agency shall be offered for resale within one year after completion of rehabilitation or an annual report concerning such property shall be published by the Agency as required by law. The Agency shall reserve such powers and controls in the disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that developments are carried out pursuant to this Plan. All purchasers or lessees of property shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a time which the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other condition, which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. To -3rovide adequate safeguards to ensuro that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency, as well as all property subject to participation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. I I I I j at es The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All property in the Project Aron is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall bF- no discrimination or segregation based upon race, sex, color, age, religion, marital status, national origin, or nncf!stry, in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a participation agreement shall be made expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sub-lease, or other transfer of land In the Project Area shall cortd,n such nondiscrimination and nonsegregation clauses as are required by law. To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to pay for, develop, or construct, any building, facility, structure, or other Improvement either within or outside the Project Area for Itself or for any public body or entity to the extent where such Improvement would be of benefit to the Project Area. During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development In the Project Area is proceeding In accordance with disposition and development documents and time schedules. For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property. 3.0 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Cooperation with City j Subject to any limitation in law, the City shall aid and cooperate with the j Agency In carrying out this Plan and shall take any further action necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread of blight or those conditions which caused the blight ire the Project Area. Actions by the City shall include but are not necessarily limited to the following: -- Institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights-of-way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, &nd other public rights-of-way in the Project Area. Such action by the City may Includo the abandonruent and relocation of public utilities in the public rights-of-way :s necessary and appropriate to carry out this Plan. -- Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and Improvements in publicly-owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area, -9- 1 "�J I I Revision of zoning, if necessary, within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized ►,y this Plan. -- Imposition wherever necessary (by conditional use permits or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels in the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. -- Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. The City and the Agency shall develop and provide for enforcement of a program for continued maintenance by owners of all real property, both public and private, within the Project Area throughout the duration of this i'lan. -• Performance of the above, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally S rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. -- Referral to the Agency for review and recommendation of nil building ' permit, zone change, zone variance, conditional use and other applications pertaining to land use and development In the Project ! Area. Referral shall be made to the Agency prior to application approval by the City. -- The City Is authorized, but not obligated to provide and expend fun-ls to ensure the completion of the project as a whole in accordance with this Plan. The obligation of the City to perform the actions indicated in this section shall, except for the obligation to provide administrative enforcement of the Plan as described in Section 3.1 hereof, be contingent upon the continued availability of funding for this pie--ject primarily from tax Increment revenues as . defined In Method for Financing herein. In the event that such funds, at any time, become unavailable for the carrying out and completion of this project, the obligation of the City shall thereafter be limited to providing assistance in the form of funds necessary to pay administrative and overhead costs in connection with the termination or completion of the project. Such termination or completion shall be limited solely to those activities previously commenced pursuant to �hls Plan. -- C he undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the project. 3.2 Ca,a;pration with Other Public Jurisdictions '.:P:akin public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate, with or without consideration, In the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this project. The Agency shall seek the aid and cooperation of su:h public bodies and shall attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies In order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the h1ghest public good. i i I The Agency, by low, Is not authorized to acquire real property ow by public bodies without the non:sent of such public bodies. The ' :y, however, will seek the cooperation of all ublir. bodies which own or Irn to acquire property in the Project Area. Toe Agency shall impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained In the Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the requirements of this Plan. Any public body which owns or leases property in fi the Pr�j:ct Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner and tenant participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. During such time as property, if any, In the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management, maintenance, and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its disposition for redevelopment. 3.3 Land Uses for the Project Area ,- Private Uses } Permitted land uses within the Project Area are those : ildential, Industrial and other uses as shall be illustrated frc.n time to time In ' the General Plan of the City. Specific permitted uaes within the Project Area are those that are permitted, or conditionally permitted, ! by the zoning ordinance contained in the Municipal Code when the zoning ordinance conforms to the General Plan. The number of dwelling units will be in accordance with M -ovision of the General Plan and zoning ordinance of the City. i -• Public Uses. Public Street Layout, Rights-of-Way and Easements # The public rights-of-way, principal streets and streets that may require Improvements as proposed for the Project Aran are Illustrated In Exhibit A. E Streets and rights-of-way may be widened, altered, abandoned, vacated, or closed by the Agency and the City as necessary for proper development of the project. Additional public streets, alleys and easements may be created by the Agency and the City In the Project Area as needed for proper development, circulation and access. i -- Saml-Public, institutional, and Nonprofit Uses 1 roe Agency Is authorized to permit the establishment or enlargement of public, semi-public, Institutional, or nonprofit uses, Including, but not necessarily limited to, educational, fraternal, employed Institutions, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations in appropriate portions of the Project Area. All such ! uses, If allowed by the Agency, shall conform so far as possible to tho ! provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses In the specific area Involved. The Agency shall impose such other reasonable restrictions upon such uses as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. 3.4 General Development Standards and Requirements All real property in the Project Area Is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. Furthermore, the Agency may, If it deems appropriate and/or necessary, specify requirements in excess of thnse described herein or specified by state and local laws. No real property shall be developed, rehahil!' . tud, or otherwise changed after the date of the i adoption of the Plan except witlo approval of the Agency ane In conformance with the provisions of this Plun. ' Construction All construction, whether new oe rehabilitation, In the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laves in effect from ' time to time Including, but not necessarily limited ta, fire, building, ; housing, electrical, heating, grading, plumbing and mechanical, sign and zoning codes of the City of Huntington Beach. -- Rehabilitation and Retention of Existing Conforming Uses ; Although the Agency does not anticipate that any existing structures ! , within the Project area will meet the standards for rehabilitation they, with Agency approval, may be repaired, altered, reconstructed, or rehabilitated, if necessary, In such manner that will meet the following requirements: -- Be safe, sanitary, and sound in all physical respects; -- Shall conform to the seismic requirements and the rehabilitation requirements of the building code for the City of Huntington Beach. +' -• Shall conform to the fire code foi ..ie City of Huntington Beach. Shall be comparable in appearanc -i the architecture of the , on-site proposed new structures. -- Retention of Existin Wanconformino Uses The Agency is authorized tr armit an existing use to remain in an existing building In decent, safe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use is generally compatible with the developments and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property must be willing to enter into a Participation Agreement and agree to the imposition of such reasonable restrictions as are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. -12- The Agency is also authorized to permit an existing use in an existing f building not in decent, anfe, and sanitary condition, which use does not conform to the provision of this Plan, provided that such buildings are rehabilitated to a decent, safe and sanitary condition, as determined by the Agency, and provided that such a use Is generally compatible with dove' lent and uses in the Project Area. The owner of such a property n.�.t be w"ling to enter Into a Part!cipatlon Agraer-ent and agree to the Imposition of such reasonable restrictions ae are necessary to protect the development and use of the Project Area. -- Incompatible Uses j No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, i glare, noise, odor, or similar factors would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, structures or uses shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. -- Subdivision or Consolidation of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, including any parcels retained by a participant, shall be subdivided or consolidated without the prior approval of the Agency. r Limitation of Building nensit t The number of buildings in the Project Area will be consistent with building Intensities permitted pursuant to existing or revised local zoning ordinances fcr the City of Huntington Beach and this Plan. Limitation on Type, Size and Height of Buildings The height, type and size of buildings shall be limited by applicable state statutes And local zoning, building, and other applicable conies g and ordinances and this plan. Where a conflict exists between such . local codes and ordinances and specific provisions of this Plan, the Plan shall supersede. All new buildings built within the Project Area shall complement the overall aesthetic and physical scale of the existing buildings within and adjacent to the project Area. Open Space, Landscaping, and Parking An approximate cmount of open space is to be provided in the Project , Area as required by City codes and ordinances and the Plan. r Within the Project Area, both public and private streets, public and private parking and private streets shall be provided for in each development consistent with or exceeding City codes and ordinances in effect from time to time and this Plan. -13- In all areas sufficient space, Including open spaces, shalt be maintained between buildings and structures to provide Adequate light., air, and privacy. I Signs which create hazards or unsightly appearances by protruding. overhanging, blink. •; flashing, showing animation, or other z similar conditions shall not be permitted In this Project Area. rile Agency shall permit only those signs necessary for Identification of buildings, premises, uses and products associated with the land parcel involved. All signs shall be submitted to the Agency and the City, as appropriate, for review and approval. -- Nondiscrimination and NonsggregatIra There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon age, race, sex, color, creed, religion, marital status, national origin, or ancestry permitted In the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. -- Employees and Contract Awards from the Community Contractors and others engaged In construction and rehabilitation activities In the Project Area shall be encouraged to hire and train the maximum number of employees and trainees from within the community consistent with the objectives of this Plan. Likewise, where feasible, the Agency shall make distinct efforts to award contracts to business concerns which are located in, or substantially owned by persons residing in, the Project Area if they meet requirements stipulated by the Agency and this Plan. -- Minor Variations .. Under exceptional circumstances, the Agency Is authorized to permit minor variations from the limits, restrictions, and controls established by this Plan. to order to permit such minor variations, the Agen:y must determine that: -- The strict application of the provisions of the Plan would result In practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships Inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of this Plan. -- There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended development of the property which do not generally apply to other properties having the some standards, restrictions and controls, -- Permitting a minor variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or Improvements within or outside the Project Area. -14- 1 ... Permitting a minor variation will not be contrary to the objectives of this Plan. No such minor variation shall be granted which changes a basic land use or which permits substantial departure from the provirions of this Plan. In permitting any such minor variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and to assure compliance with the purposes of this Plan. NondiscriminaV and nonsegregation restrictions shall not be subject to minor varlat`. l No minor variation permitted by the Agency shall be effective until conditional uses, variances, or other zoning changes, If any, have been effectuated by the City to the extent necessary to obtain consistency (, with such minor variations permitted by the Agency. 3.5 Methods for Project Firancing t 3.5.1 Genera! Description of the Proposed Financing Method Upon adoption of this Plan by the City Council, the Agency, If It deems appropriate, is authorized to finance this project with assistance from the City of Huntington Beach, Orarige County, State of California, Federal Government of the United States of America, any other public agency, donations, special assessment districts, property tax 11icrements, interest revenue, income revenue, Agency-issued notes and bonds, loans from private institutions, the j lease of Agency-owned property, the sale of Agency-owned property, or from any other sources of financing which are legally available and , do not conflict with the objectives of the Plan. I The City may supply advances and expenO money as necessary to assist the Agency In carrying out this project. Such assistance shall be on terms established by an agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. 3.5.2 Tax Increments f' x Tax increment financing may not be the only source of funding for the Redevelopment Project. However, the i•rojeU assessed valuation base t will be established In accordance with state law as described herein. i Any tax increments will be used to defray project expenses to the extent the Increment by itself or from the sale of tax allocation boride allows. 4 All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Talbert-peach Redevelopment Project Area each year by or for the benefit of the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, any district, or other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Redevelopment Plan, shall be divided as follows: 1 ' } • 15- i i _..._ .. .. .. ..... _.. _ . . -. ;' : .ref.•.' ,r.=,, That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax Is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the property In the redevelopm k project as shown jpon the rssessment roll used ei connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes, by or for said taxing agencies, on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which such territory Is annexed or otherwise Included after such effective date, the assessed roll of the County of Orange last equalized an the effective date of said ordinance shall ba used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property In the project on said effective date); and -- That portion of said levied taxes each year In excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid Into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and Interest on bonds, loans, mantes advanced to, or Indebtedness j (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) incurred b the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in hart, this redevelopment project. Unless ,and until the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property In the project as shown an the last equalized assessment roll, all of the taxes levied and collected upon; the taxable property In the project shall be paid Into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, If any, and Interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the protect shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all ether property are paid. •- That portion of taxes discussed In this Subsection are hereby Irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and Interest on the advance of monies, or making loans, or the Incurring of any Indebtedness, (whether funded, refunded, assumed, or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance In whole or In part the Talbert-Beach Redevelopment Project. The Agency Is authorized to makes such pledges as to specific advances, loans, and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the project, subject to the limitations on allocation of taxes, debt creation, and bonded Indebtedness contained In this Subsection. -16- i I 3.5.3 Issuance of Bonds and Notes or notes when a determination has been The Agency may issue bonds � made that such financing Is appropriate and feasible. Such bonds or notes shall be issued only afte- the Agency has determined that funds are, or will be, availablL to repay principal and interest when due and payable. In any case, the issuance of bonds nr notes shall be subject to the limitations stipulated below. Neither the members of the Agency, nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for them, nor in any event, shall the 1,onds ur obligations ba payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an Indebtedness with the meaning of any constitutional or statutury debt limitation o. restriction. 3.5.4 Loans and Grants { Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from the United States, or any other public or private source will be utilized if available as the Agency deems appropriate to its corporate purposes. h 3.5.5 Relief of Financial Burdens The Agency may in any year during which it owns property in a redevelopment project pay directly to any city, county, city and d a a school district or u t district Including, but not limits t , , county, , 9� Y other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property hart 1: not been exempt, an amount of money In lieu of taxes. The Agency may also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area :1her than the City, any amounts of money which In the Agency's determination is appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the i project. 3.5.6 Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2 and 33334.2 of the Ca.ifornia Community Redevelopment Law, the following limitations are imposed on this Plan. •- Taxes as defined in Section 33670 of the California Community Redevelopment Law shall not be divided and shall not be allocated to the Agency during any one fiscal (tax) year except by amendment of this Plan, in excess of $350,000. i -17- -- No loans, advances, or indebtedness to finance, In whole or in part, the R=development Project and to be repaid from the allocation of those taxes desr!rib,;d In the beforementloned Section 33670 shall be established or Incurred by the Agency beyond 20 years from the date of adoption of this Plan by the City Council unless such time limitation is extended by amendment of this Plan. Howaver, such loans, advances, or Indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time longer Gion such time limit. -- Without an amendment of this Plan, the amount of bonded Indebtedness swerved by tax increments which the Agency have outstanding at any one time shall not exceed $3,500,0,. -- Not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the .agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the community's supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income, as defined In Health and Safety Code Section 41056 and very low Income households as defined In Section 41067, unless one of the following findings are made: -- That no need exists in the community, the provision of which would benefit the Project Area to Improve or Increase the ' supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate Income or very low income households; or That somi- ;;toted percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 Is sufficient to meet such housing need; or -- That a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the community is being made, and that this ' effort, Including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the community from state, local and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or In combination with the taxes allocated, under this section, Is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to this section. The City Council of the City shall consider the need that can be reasonably foreseen because of displacement of persons of low or moderate Income or very low Income households from within or adjacent to the Project Area, because of Increased employment opportunities, or because of any other direct or indirect result of Implementation p ntation of the Redevelopment Plan. -1$- . �ircanr t1�/ses�iili�rlmet M i i � trwrt . : _�• oe ! .-APd .I• .!. + 3 j0 i�r�Cs}/X^_l e' •t _ .e..:e.1..7�.i.at.at..r �+==.�i••' s..k.w.. �rit.ir..S�..:rr..ar-Ii+w■i..r ii�l�l�■! E.I. .ic.ir. _ .St. .aIV __�_�_r__ic.�! ri1��5TiQOtrj �f'•Q�C •. ..w.-+�.�t. � I .y .a.re_:v_.i►.�•..y._�._r. demo /r�Kn IL. .♦.i I.ice. ..w..• �'3•IL.%._M'_..A!.%l.t.in + -.f..Jt.I►.:Si - Imo..ito00. -10.%[_�t.M_I�':�/ ..'_"--- w � •+c_i..:�.w..rr.�t.r=_.it._a.re -''!'- r:N ' tp � I� ; . � ' .'..'. �.� .rays. .,«� -'�' •:!-� ' ®0- owl'r Op171 — p = Sere 4i O cr~es) Cr � 7ct�P.P}• � � Q. t T ERT~BE.ACH !�4 nojECT EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Those portions of Sections 35 and 26, Township 5 South, Range ' a 4est, in the Rancho La Boisa Chica and Rancho Las Bolsas in the City of Huntington -leach, County of Grange, State of California, as shian on a map recorded in Booi. i1 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the northerly prolongation of the west boundary line of Tract No. 172, as shown on a map recorded in Book 12, page 21, of Miscellan- eous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, and a line parallel with and 50.00 feet north measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along said mentioned parallel line 793 1 feet to the intersection with a line parallei with and 10.00 feet east measured at right angles from the east line of Lot No. 3, Block C of said mentioned Tract No, 172; thence southerly along said mentioned parallel line 300 ± feet to a point on a curve concave easterly having a radius of ?.?3.00 feet; thence southerly along said curve through a central angle of 15033449" an arc distance of 74.16 feet to a point on rA tangent reverse curve concave westerly having a radius of 327.00 feet; thence southerly along said reverse curve through a central angle of 15033 49� an arc distance of 88.82 feet to a line parallel with and 32 feet east measured at right angles from the west line of Lot No. 82, Block C, of said mentioned Tract No. 172; thence southerly along last said mentioned parallel line 250 ± feet to the inter- section with the easterly prolongation of the north boundary line of Tract No. 8197 as shown on a map recorded in Book 452, page 44, of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of sail County; thence westerly along said mentioned prolongation and northerly line 832 - feet to the west boundar� line of said Tract No. 8197; thence southerly along said west boundary line 690 - feet to the south right-of-way line of Taylor Drive, a street being 60 feet in width, 30 feet either side of centerline; thence westerly along said south right-of-way line 660 ± feet to the intersection with the southerly prolongation of the east line of Parcels Nos. 7-10 as shown on a map filed in Book 79, page 15 of Parc�•l Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence northerly along said prolongation and east line 1014 t feet to a line parallel with and 335 ± feet south measured at right angles from the centerline of Talbert Avenue; thence easterly along last said mentioned parallel line 660 ± feet to the west line of Tract No. 172; thence northerly along said west line 385 t feet to the point of beginning. i i E -20- i ... r . . .. ._ ... ....... .o .. ... ....w . ... J{I . ....ICY l.Y r i Authorized to Publish Advortmement!of all kinds indudinp public notices by D, .Ie of the Superior Court of Orang i V nty, California, t• • i,er A-6214. dated 29 Serilembar. ;81, and A•24831,do • ' 11 June. '63. STATE OF •.'ALIFORNIA my of Orangf rwbK►OIK4 Ao.«a,.q t:o.«.d f by I%# wdw,s Ni " r pool 4 i,tn 10 PKa calorie,..d.n am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the Counll foresaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and rin'. a party to or Interested In the below entitled ma.iar. r am a princip&l clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which !s combined the f NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, Stale of California, and that it Notice of public Notice CTTy or Ht1NTTNaTQN BEACH of which copy attached hereto Is a true and complete ';'y;; tfetzr= copy. was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, SACK Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, y l tie+ w.. Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna 744 °'r rw.d ;t` M • Beach Issues of said newspaper for pee1Ma��r I> �=.11a j 'xX6WdlCMX&WK9fMKthe issueg) of W !h �= on if iie'r TwMr1#ee4 1 'RtM IMrsip itMl M pebrua ' trlr►te�srr�t+r 1eo- ziry 17 , 198 Pow _, t 98ut4r o�ir+ii PBot' 198- aMryr fyort i co >' .a �Mirah�,1fwt �.�,. ��,�•::� 1 • 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing Is true and correct. Executed on rahrnwrx ,7 , 1984_ at Costa Mesa, California. n - Signature I PROOF OF PUBLICATION I � i Authorized to Publish Advertisements of oft kinds including pubt;c notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County. Calllorrrt Number A•6214, dated 29 Suptember, 1961. and A-24631.dated 11 June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Pucrc Note Aa.tt.rwro c D,IM 4M10►v.1 V POM►►1 Mt r purl W"h to OKA cokwm.wth t I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange I l' Coast -DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the 1 NEWS•PPSSS, a newspaper of general circulation, h. NtA° i i printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, _ TRIIN tsol1trNMIF . G't1�1tt1 i County of Orange. Slide of Cahfcrnia, and that a t�tiawcT Public [fearing—City No�Is Mmy,G"N I;,Notice o1 9`Cis y ai 1t.H. Vw,fltleNloprtta4 A ww of the ' PROP_0.,,Spa_ T.LAct? FPPDRY. PrRK SVNTnn a :a '1the AQWO iq tq,wer i CITIZENS IIOUST41G PROJECT taoManT wryIt, � . + tM+lrat IM r.7rWM{ �t�M'e, of which copy attached hereto Is a true and complete tIt100 MWA'-#SWA. wn tun�eon on. IO 1 C�taia copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Inpton .a a , Vus Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, a vCM ar2R Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna r'► 'l^^� ln;Mta Lmm'AtlrastvtstN Beach Issues of said newspaper for .fQ�11 henarslle►.repn+d 101 11COa et the rtarrttwtw t;wdrent.a fltbert xdarts xddxeewRefoa�ax+ l�pQissur�(s► of Awtwaswo ►si*rnawaw.intthee fa n etrret a smock 1 l ft woo in4 nr*M to ire oatoWWx s kVAdmd N it'sp opora.e ram a kaar rNre� nrent bjr and hetwaen the eny and Feb. 6 the deted as at!`Hiroo 1; TIM.a am of■Molt As or�ntyMe;;wi pre Leo nveWft k*a1k W• my a N Feb. 10 geetat!penan rrtuatwrd ¢die 198...� Now at ire ali"a tt"PA�anr,aayy u I*M:Mein Vireos, Nwntnpioa Feb. 13 q Ilisasll,i C&-,rlti4L beftm i site baun ao OM am.and 5..90 1>J16 198 MorttMtr ntratrpt 111irmtrtr.'aktw" hoedeya_ Ths aq+ea M Md00 10 ie be +wetlMsaot+nehlwN'i�Mr Mw Feb. 17 t,lt ttYnewtt areMOMty Ned " _ . 198 q i t a vawo eMe. of of ._. 19 8 ani t t aYceneawrx+.t � � RE ,lratratssjyaN,lOer a mode`-; � eltt kte0rlta Letewte.' ; �:.r l declare, under penalty of perjury, that the „F�"'^�: i foregoing Is true and correct. omewy s rlt PWbaWWd to 1`V Casa owa,'Fi9t 1 Fep,1.1�0,I'? t Executed on _February 17, + 198 4 at Costa Mesa, California. w Signature t f t , PROOF OF PUBLICATION C r�. ') 5t, TNDe17 3/„ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OROPOSED LEASE TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (The "Agency") that a public hearing will be held by the Agency 3t the hour of 7:30 p.m. on Monday, March 19, 1984, at the Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, on the proposed lease by Agency to the City of Huntington Beach of a senior citizens multi-family housing project known as the Terry Park Senior Citizens Housing Project (more fully described in the Lease Agreement hereinafter referred to) located at the southwest quadrant of Talbert Avenue and 3each Boulevard, in the City of Huntington Beach. Such lease shall be upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the proposed form of 'tease agreement by and between the City and the Agency, dated as of March 1, 1984, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary of the Agency and is available for inspection by any interested person requesting the same at the office of the Agency at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, between the hours of R!00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The project is intended to be developed consistent with the referendum authority granted by Proposition L (approved by a majority of the City's voters in 6/80) pursuant to Article 34 of the California State Constitution and governing Ii the City's participation in the development, constructicn, financing, or acquisition of housing for elderly, handicapped, low or moderate income persons. Dated: 9 /S/ Alicia M. NetWorth j secretary 1 � REQUEST FOR LiY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT At,..VCY ACTION RH 11-11 Date March 16 , 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor/Chairman and City Council/Redevelopment Agency Members Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Executive Officer Prepared by: Tom Tincher, Redevelopment Coordinator Subject: PUBLIC HEARING ON TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS APARTMENT PROJECT LEASE AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL IN CONCEPT OF FINANCING DOCUMENTS Statemait of Issue, Reoomnmfidation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attrichments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Redevelopment Agency is pursuing the final steps which will result in the financing and construction of the Terry Park Senior Citizens Apartment Project, At this time, the Agency is being asked to hold a public hearing on the Lease Agreement between tht City and Agency which is an integral part of the overall financing program and to approve the financing documents in concept. Once the Underwriter has placed the financing cer-ificates with a buyer and the terms of the purchase are established, the documents will be finalized and the Agency/City Council will be asked to call a special meeting, if necessary, so that the docu- ments can be executed at the earliest possible date. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hold public hearing on the Terry Park Senior Citizens Apartment Project Lease Agreement, receive 33433 Report on said Agreement and continue public hearing to the time and place of the special meeting, at which time the Lease Agreement and the other financing documents will be executed. (See Exhibit A). 2. Authorize The William Lyon Company to proceed with the grading work on the Terry Park Senior Citizens Apartment project site with the understanding that the cost for such work,which shall not exceed $60,000, will be credited to The William Lyon Company toward its payment of the condominium pro.'ect land acquisition price. This action will advance their payment to the Agency and expedite the construction schedule for the projec+,• and thus, reduce costs and the amount of dollars which the Agency would otherwise have to borrow. 3. Authorize The William Lyon Company, with the written approval of the City Administrator, to proceed with other necessary on-site work for the Senio> Apartment Project with the understanding that the William Lyon Company will be credited for the cost of such work toward the condominium project land acquisition price. The total dollar amount of such additional work shall not exceed $310,000. It is anti- cipated that the balance of the $823,000 land acquisition price will be used 'i, pay the development fee which we will owe to the Lyon Company and to support the Agency's Terry Park Senior Citizens Housing Fund which is recommended be established. 4. Direct staff to assess the potential to reprogram approximately $310,000 in Housing b Co�rmunity Development Block Grant Funds which could be loaned to the Redevelopment Agency if Recommendation No, 3 above does not occur. This action, likewise, would allow the on-site construction work to commence immediately and ' r 41 I I RH 84-11 March 16, 1984 Page Two result in substantial savings to the Redevelopment Agency and thus a reduction in project costs. The H.C.D. funds would be reimbursed from the condomiunium project land sale proceeds when they are received. CWT:TT:lp i i 1 1 i i i I t IN7'HP. Superior Court `-tr- zt OP7ltlt �• STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for tho County of Ornntie I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK riteov,O •ZL1 ljV.�_Tl0_N �w 1 Public Hearing i 1 Terry Park Housing Protect Stattrofcalifopia 1 County of orange ) s. • / ptlfta,ICAr�rltt&ti• . , Rita J. Richter That I am land at all times herein mentionnl was a citizen of the United States,over llto age of twenty-one yea*,and that i ,`: ■ dT of an►not a party to,nor interested in the Above entitled matter. that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the � wr�v1A ttaK HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW so Ion At • eidi' �,wirrit�r�r�•ttf�. t newspaper of general circulation,published in the City et HUNTINGTON BEACHa�w�r thaw? County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the ;►w+lssflertttt,+ iM Awwid disemination of local news anti intelligence of a general charac• �, ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had i � of �q and still hm a bona ride subscription list of haying sulreribe*, Mow gadiwsspw and which newspaper has been establiehrd,printed and pub• isrwt l� Md1 1 �09! lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a p rs t1,wtty 00 a. iil period exceeding one year: that the notice, of which the AW . ad1,0 :0 annexed is a printed copy,his been published in the regular �IMJLV and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement fl+iu thereof,on the following dates,to wit: ��g44pp bon d Unbd to aws+tw4 wo, February 9, 1.984 l tM cuo V / A�W g ��141rlN'!tM'OilT1t 1 certify(or derbut)under penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is true and correct. / Pub.rel.i tit►f + Dated at.............UT Men.Grove.................. F bruary 64 Califor i is gth eyol..........Ih........ Rita J. Richter r �j Signature Form No.POP 92082 � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '�16 all,3 PROPOSED LEASE TERRY PARK SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT 3 CL�#(V✓L� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (the "Agency") that a public hearing will be held by the Agency at the hour of 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 21, 1984, at the Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, on the proposed lease by Agency to the City of Huntington Beach of a senior citizens multi-family housing project known as the Terry Park Senior Citizens Housing Project (more i fully described in the Lease Agreement hereinafter referred to) located at the southwest quadrant of Talbert Avenue and Beach Boulevard, in the City of Huntington Beach. Such lease shall be upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the proposed form of lease agreement by and between the City and the Agency, dated as of March 1, 19B4, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary of the Agency and is available for inspection by any interested person requesting the same at the office of the Agency at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The project is intended to be developed consistent with the referendum authority granted by Proposition L (approved by a majority of the City's voters in 6/80) pursuant to Article 34 of the California State Constitution and governing the City's participation in the development, construction, financing or acquisition of housing for elderly, handicapped, low or moderate income persons. f Dated: February 1, 1984 I Secretary REQUEST OR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY At..)ON RH 84_55 Date February 8, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency rr,,,,��� Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer lam' Prepared by: Charles P. Spen fRY Special Projects Coordinator Subject: PREPARATION OF PARK SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT LEASE Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Before the Redevelopment Agency and the City may consummate the tax exempt financing for the Terry Park Senior Housing Project, it is necessary for the Agency to conduct a public hearing regarding the lease of the project site to the City. Consistent with this requirement of redevelopment law, such a hearing has been duly noticed for this Redevelopment Agency's regularly adjourned meeting Tuesday, February 21, 1984. RECOMMENDATION: After the close of the required public hearing, direct the preparation of the Agency's lease of the site for the Terry Park Senior Housing Project to the City of Huntington Beach, ANALYSIS: State Late requires that before the Redevelopment Agency may lease real property, a public hearing must be conducted. The City's Bond Counsel , Jones, Hall , Hill and White, prepared the appropriate form for the public notice of this hearing and this notice was published,as required by law, twice a week for two consecutive weeks prior to the hearing (published February 6, 10, 13, and 17). Bond Counsel also advises that the Agency is empowered to apprnve leasing of this j real property to the City by minute action. The lease itself will accompany the other documents necessary to consummate the tax exempt financing to be subsequently considered by the Agency and the City Council . r FUNDING SOURCE: Costs to be financed from proceeds of securities sale. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Continue the public hearing. CWT:SVK:lp P10 4/01 •�t IN nw Superior Court nrnrr. .� �� cH (� wa, STArTF OF CALIFOHNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1410OF(Iprllp•LIVA RIN CITY CLERK JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Stale of California 1 I County of Orange la"' �%4 Ig,��j1YTNE{TtYt>otKiKJt G AFRIL L. ELLIOTT T�c����*���� �� •� Rr�eYta t> T�t/r tier Tfa rsa: lcn 7At�IlT•fRAt114Jr>OdCTLI,01'iiZ�IT fi.Atl r � !tltiar Whole 0"am tht City Caest"ef the city of litrstir"hwk That I am and at all time herein mentionell war it cititrn of CaLrsnis t7r fisat�swt tle.�# t A Mwwt twpttn�6rt7, lfa2 of 9wt0 p,m.As Ilew ltreq aed Sit cown Nessbra or w nor Han.Frio main the IInitM Staten,live the age of Iwenty.one yrarp.and that I sutet,Huasusidtaw beach,cWtrsistrlldaea W (Wa JieatpAk*via%tit to ant not a party ter,nor interested in the alitn•e entitled matter; !he(d tErC+rCcwrlsedtl.lte +i�p.er rywrw.idrrthe W that I am the principal rlrrk t+f the printer of the &dt of IM porvr TOW lte.rk ttlrw 11t►�y ertp r n 1 is 41 s0arfidf PPMr th arts.tlrr i►twinw 04(lty cnuapl HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW � iiM�r16�A t 1.'Itie Y1w swb&titwd►r atw Apat'y rY1i�•opa«ee i4 erupt eri � a ore. Ixr of general cirndation, uhliahtKi in the('its of I t abreeuxi o visina s twu►s oereiith- M-Te wsnll epf*erwr,eFruwrin pa n pateti(+wiitw e.tfadehte y tiu6tit iyro►1!tt.�.ptaeaM 2.TM rvptl oftlr Atvaty to tM CAy�rattl wt alit txopend Rtdl N Nw HUNTINGTON BEACH l .'Mrhd.v 6A is as litseted u,the etrisn.tit latrs&swadstion d W Muniri��t Cwsearw,a as he Plan std ahe nut ei/LLt('leanly!wed ksaiw CcYstiltre Id County of Orange and which newspaper is published fall the 71is. - + i'T1r ta�in�ax.eal ft�{wtt Itepat aw tA. Pts. diseminatinn of local nerve and intrlbgrn:e of a general chnrac• P"t this ; 1.•Ap tsideset aed lesutttday fttr sod Kunst 1M aekglsta oaf tkef(kdetekr(aotal ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had !'fait and sill has or bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers. At iht atwtr etaw 4kv.kitty aid eM�ts,ar atdl tr.cera FAY and which newspaper bait been established, printed and pull. *v"sIlUtaly will►ws,rawtrttillsh castle iw 1 r�*wdi rwr aPecu bet.re t.4 Atest;r and tke Co,aetl and.hda esis..rkr ilia fished at regular intervals in the said County of Orarutr fire {rupttd •IvswratP4aeiasrldsnfbrdnotMf polled esrredinK one year; that the notice, of which the At say this etoW»thenSak4adar illotlotA.arwwtuyprxsr+, ikv bthr pttq-wl I PWt MAY rtie Its writing%*A the City(M+t.4 anneird is a printed ropy,has been puhlithrd in the regular Astes,twt d his�a y�,ftvd Nrdewbpsswat l'1m,Am w+•r►pr and entire issue of said new•itl•apet,and not in env oupptement +apes &ss dtdeirq b 1e iri f Mitttr sf(uisled as s�.wtwub 910 M Lewd.Aa the thereof,sin the following dates,fo wit: dwe.aid boa the itatiKe)shag jin"d b►e"r and tws t,aa d1 wr+ttes erid yrel tk jne«m to tlr pre Kndetek tsntnt Pleb Tie prtpved Itr"k""t Ma still r^%*+wiaul lat+Kt popat us rw.on �r� rift and! s to paht Irmo ie i1 orfiev sir the lh~of Awrn in sad AUG. 129 19 y 261 SEP. 2w 1992 Indu.+dit�aaipiae.�ror rrrt Nitatiris+a.w.tscaut+.iwr�►aa,• !'erev P"rw�rrr rwarr,buritr.a a►ksW iew.twasd ftt 1wMaesiut a prtkipitsl. ppwwarat Ia Iks F'gtit4petea Bake eitkvW by the Agency.!itil"siib+iit in the A(rney s two�lreed-kaumem of laterrsa b Psrtxipse%whin ditty Mi darn from the dNt s r ryk�,.��,�tuxi d Ow Hedtvn Iao�rm PMa Ire the Atmq. fit hwndaryw d the"wit Rodrirkpxnt Pka art so drrw it ID>r UA `A`.atla�krti • •YaMhii`A^ • IJ•Y:A1.[N�CftIPT7t)N • TAtSIEIiT•BF.ACHRf'SSE1ti1.t)1'Mt+.Nt'PAtUDCTAtttU1 • I t•crtify for declarri under I t 1 wnaltyof eet•ur•th,tt the• (arrrvn ti�'"'epsti`"~' '0n�� 'T°+'tAybtiiwl0.p �tlWttt.l"ltit ttaewta l+s Neiaa Chen and IinisAd la(k,1.ast iA 11w lhr firer d�}tu�tu4'tua Bcwlti ingintrus,andvisrrect. C�titityrrOrseitw,Mtstudt'►t:hasiaa awn"04a sop nMil Ss110AAt Page IJ y Miaeettandrw 11ep i.Shw(!(flee d the county Rewetdrr d said Cwirlr dtanbed Dated at...•GARDEN, GROVE.,....... at .......•••••••. l4liitis aiao j air toW>+east ttx+wr tJ Mid titclb&9AG tketsee$RYk as drytitw. tia'Z.r 1i ost Iglu A wit akvq I he ettai lit*d uw wrtktr,mW acwh Wae.M.heisy� the com"Aaw of Talbert kmat,to O's Trot Paint it Ile0s.aMltt theaty lk h p Cali fornia,t 7 t h..,.day of..�FrA.v..1'1.a .... depews 01'li (cool bl 4wt to&List pantkl nth still 50 fret lei.*tie w.W u a+VMs ttso taw re tellw ti To%m Ate Ossire alerts wild iseMiused qi M � / lit*h.w th 80 dwm sari"You 009(tea to it;Wrieetim VM s lire purl oink •L.•.(i mz�e and 1400 few«aa tswssnd«right agftw[raw lw.w kn.ii tea Wi.J,hlaxl C ell Trot M M as aMiws to*map ntetdwd is%412. ill the alfk+e it tM C.ra l)peardrt of MW CauMr;Ywwa tiignatttrr �hiaestltaftiearreth0da(rraatL'r'ElsaXOturfbaptlAtdaa 4M thetrsrrse■tay�, hati"�a ttditn d Mto fret;tiv"w swalvrtrr tilarir acid estre tl"w�k s ttntrsl 4284.41 s detrrwa Sr(rar.sick distant&vri-0t fret to a point ebb tap$"Ito-.1 . My t•mraw"w.tufy Ittetat A tstliaa 0(MM f«t,s tsdkt to rid point Will � Natk 7/ebMto%M*m'rast;thew sasaii,*&last ud nraew Met wtto a terittd wM of IS e(eferaa 70'aJ"sit tut ektlatye of tAf112 hN t•a k&r vilk j W 32/eft fist attwuced tit tkht doilies[tor tke stall line td Lot Nit R.tdrteti C.a( j rid nrwivatd Trset I�kL lit itiests yotstu*&knit last"a awatfard pr.7el lies toot,D 0677'east 2411 fart to this iMse etraa With the wselarlr fiat d0# ka&dary Pas of Term Nit 0197 as slsrs sit a asap lrerrd9�t i"Uati{lit.' !r` pan 11 d Miant4sewt►M"in tho drkv e:f the Comity Btfwdw►M(estadid ras=• lhrntt allot old ssil s arthtrh line soul k M drltass w i H'wt M2 tort to ehw west rased' ar}Aa+ef said Told Nit At17i theser akrit"Wisest bwnd.ry tut souti u date.at•I9-4.4 at0(M to Still sank rwhe4-way lint et '?a>!�r[1►rte a tfh+e krint Po fret la tWrb.20 feel aithrr r%1r or csnsrrksr.tMae ' �.y `le tR tent toutk tight of�•rrq�r lieu lark N dwm Mal"wsf QA frA to the LAF.81301 1+r�r Iwakw lda of Use rots Law ter Pared.tkw 7•t0 as t�m�i*40 rr1•d a Ma,i 71L Pop 1 b d Punt Maya ia tlx Ofrtn tf Ile Cawtr; Rs ftrdrr d stt.d Cm mr:rM"ee ak-said rtokrsltalioe arid eat li.*atrth 0 lletr" , 011 S'ta1 1014 fret to s fait WAM Mlle gad 115 feet south aeutved at titM Aeyk� froze the trstedisw of TslbrS Amur,Ihe,"ahwyt law laid svrvb4d iara!!il lrrtt t.d-yth k&r.ee"M7+eeq 6M rent to the-,-I.I line c(TnA Mo.02:tMrto sknt r N.thru M.dd� kt'tr"it IM If"to the Tow Nam of Ilertmrtertt• Cet;Clerk,r'rVietyt.n perch City C.awrcir Seeet.ry,lu"loonnt0—hl4raktet.petwntArtmv, — W.flaw City Adms,itttt"+e,t5ty d ifunlitoan tkW is Estee.( iitte.Nuttartiion Iltreh(tedtvrhrrmmt Attivi, IIAntI Au fiat!!,IPF2 CrTYOfHL!.Tlti(i70,4BEA 11 rM(•MXIs tN FeCX17116*4-S'_'7 Puts,ust Hilrh la•!tltr�,ttv t tN Tin: Superior Court nR TIIF. "fire sTATk:OF CALIFORNIA I � 1 B�e..►'``t`" In and for the['ounh•of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERKIS OFFICE I'RtxtFOF'1'ttI11.1rA-LION PUBLIC HEARING StatenfCelifo•nia 1 11101 ZWAJ)WKMWIRTMCd COMM01 f'ounty(ifOfange )aa• TMMC7}Yq/1Ct1tQrM"1MWI1 BRA!' A P R I L L. ELLIOTT Rtmir>mt�or+lorrAal{rin!�It�fsc��•. TAlftta<T�i46lBRMM70.0flftFtr►t Ned"M►rnbi fkan ad►a Ch aardl 4(me car of )Made. mat�rr�dwtMitBW�r WIb�N tie Qyr Mfri That I am and at all titer•herein mentioned-Am.t rit.rrn of sold.��ja1►M� .itp�W«IYt Mahler W�l�r«wyr�f� t the Ilnard States,mar the mrr of twenty-one yt•ar.,and thal I �r do it Is, Tdbsp � flrr►.Tir AAtrttr W I am not a patty to,nor intere+tt-it to the atn�t entitled matter, W )Elsa owe*)" lswibr,lie Citr[� that I am the principal clerk of the printer..(the spfr+a«radiAs�W}tslarr i 4ler` nr.tr«tt[aF�1•�eB'�'"�"C"`tt�rt�t: � . , 1.T!s +.wtt«hwM"'yibtt.tpvri+i «w.q.taa ; HUNTINGTON BEACH I Nb. REV. "�' '"'' r■rrw..e�ttl.we,ir'... 'o*"'""'r I wWtrIwo tNsrr�air dtwkltwwr,weMAt �ww�M wMr oneritpapet of general tirndation,prr}rli+hwl in the f'ih•f A q Wlyw��riWit f aM�11ap+1«riMMwl+p+N1W bwbKi a.ttw Is ed a,M+ ..t ta�wdokiw r w HUNTINGTON BEACH C«..rffibma ►+t'm$WMat.r•"1ioww.cengnwllw.w.c"WitM+� County of Orange and which newipaprr in published for thr aA iwr.q it 1+rivet do alrptl L ei 04.6 sat { disemination of heal news anti intelliyrnce of a general charet- 1�atsosiA.y �a,�.�tss� riss�wlR ibl let. and which new•*paper at all timra herein meotionrrl had lead let. and still his a 1xina Uesubactiption list of paying+ul.+cribers, ftsw ��r l� rY+kewwMregaw>r addt°rasaiasytM and which newspaper has twen retebltahetl, printrl and pub• gngoed irewtettwsrtt?wAllyddtalra�tpsL At it*g tba rN I.tw tie W lass at H cats t>«+�+ lisaed at regular intervals in the acid Porn ty of Otange for a tw W pta�+ni�Plea MW fib, is low" tlw CIBr Catrt i period eirteeding onr year; that the oattrr, of which thr eta d Isle 611 va b,e- �ws1�>'�IM!P"�w innesed be a printed ropy.ban been pubbithrd in the regular s�W �~M�'—'" ate` a~�A µW rhwswlA tw W wirreY sbri prase w ins sad-PM VP.all srrlHaa aid seal and entire Witte of sa;d newspaper,and not in an+•supplerncnt °h11sttkessle lrr��lf{tdswtepwM �1 1 � a thereof,on the following dater,to veil: (1y�'fl�p�s+psarto�� b W Who d tM W It11 rtasi m ad iiL+drsttsiMsi`Ittt«g 1211or `ti"'�,N..Www. +s�t+>pp ft�. �'«* ar t w�r•+'ii.. `'w« 'r "�" a tx fa is AUG. 12 s 19 t 261 SEP. 29 1982 ii�ritbswata►rttkiris + stwU aftshv« W dw r r W five IT tM A>ftrey. . t TM baoMrW st tw�Awoutwiwt Pleat in tr 6fta Is WiiWt I.AOAL DEKX"dN TAL6OT•BRACH RXDWXLDFbWaPMGMTAM TUN Porthole d asttkst 7R ad it T"a"a 81it0.F~11 pit.M 00 'Baic!f las 6titsr tales iaA Raatls Ls1 ffalttt M tfa tfr per r it.irlt, I certify(or declare)undrr .realty of wr un that thr fore)',• MCd+tacit.«shwnwint�israo ON-0 bask Ir♦a17 t 1 1 �r Yi.attwsis b W lltriss tl w Cswg R.tts+dw of.da C.�s.t�stalw , ing is true and correct. :akrisrse ser GARDEN GROVE si n tb itlast'eeeatt d aid um Dated At......... %MYY�to kvt sloa7 tAi senh Ws trt+M sstti gisll trutA Wi rMo Wet Use awrtwsaw d TOW A+ionw to do Tim fsirt MBqwm*Wes Irsr1Y 8 l rep«01'1�"FAA 60 W M s Use}waO VVA«d 10 10 will usem d U 3 r d SEP. 82 r bow tie tarts'-d Ttiarrt Arsarrl dow d"air ttasattrwed Crlifornii.thin ........day nf .... .....19...... . a*0depwsw617z'tiit 1wtlrlMMtanetltw settle alists W" r i &W Most twq art atrsanad it ftu tutdu bm W wit lbw al Leg Me. WA C d, b W caper Amass" A""wrillsor�`I►rr d al f*MsBwrwi I ar wdMi o car iiw 70o w.t w./a.t.r....r a ads d bMi Wta iwrtwy alaatt«Y arts Signature a%%dIIdspsw3rWasandaVmaIt 1rlwtba/rissrra 1"_ rsrrrw llreler a red"d 9740 hK a trd{d a raid Nwill,71 dsFw 'Ant thaw saatsYb Awl aH atria r*+s R sessswrritt4eeWJJY r to d1kvw arar s dea a an rs d amwO hot Ir a lad 77 live)isiiwwd it rY►I«ka dis"A t ar sf Iut Ida r aid Tnd Ida III t�Yii«satin))_ Ysig 7sst isM is«ilwad/it�tl "Wit 0 dwm OaT feet is w rswssettw r+llt 1M swli�gr rare �Ttset Mt etSJ s ti�wr w r tart wsnillbt, ►p N of Mkodbesaw 1Lp b tiw Aries r W AsrrAar it( ssld new«sky ss"ttsatlssai cad rsnW Vfg lie utrM M daps ib'M' Nett IAf/sA a as tract d ssld Ttaat ll/a rllp.dwr�mr aW aril) ryW� i Vat 0 t'1'1tY" MAW CIA swMY t r d ssgl iw d T i met l tat b w t,101"OMW dh r iirNrbrt.irs.es .I*«ld"""A" No Mile.-rlsistsr xW.vet M Owt w tIa � �1. ..► bwwwte+.'nt■16 W 1 0 d ena llw of ftisai IIi►7 )«. wrenssI1zle ifaboi hp athml1WrbtM11MwdM.C.rmq- Bscwdsr of wM'wt�*dmw beer tW twi7rrrstlw sri ssN Mss ritti 0 drresw No CA r•8t l89 01'lI"salt toll fwt a a Iltw rAl►art 1f ltif sswei sswrral a tilt baa W alrwatYas r TaMiti ANasst[kwMlwt ietl MWwd� II dgnaw f�77•nt 1 fA0 4 =iw tla vet ai T11 flw IT4 skis . a ewid.ast lira said l i+pw tii'14'Url ire Ml'ow7lW Psbtot lsJaaiq. h/Atlda 7L tvMWWr i�R. _ _DsW A/taeY• L�1 (one 1f `Ttf+ml1 Bl�ACit 4 ' rMlx�s�� iti�)s,�Irn A. . tw:Bawl,I.d.tics.traxte7 , •. •�._ ,eta,,, ,�, :. � :,