Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile 1 of 2 - Trash Disposal - Includes Orange County Master . HEALTH EFUSE COLLECTION & DISPO S . 3250 ARTICLE 325' ' FEES S . 3250 Liability of occupants for fees ; billing landlord. S . 3250.1 The ,City Council finds that the periodic collection of refuse from all places and premises in the City benefits all occupants of places and premises in the City and, therefore , all occupants receiving the benefit of the basic level of refuse service are made liable for refuse collection fees prescribed by this article. ...S . 3250.2 The case- of premises in which the occupant does not receive the billing - for refuse collection but the landlord does , such .landlord shall collect such fees levied against - the occupant of the dwelling unit or place of places of -business located on such . premises , : and shall transmit the amount to be collected . to the City. .•S . 3250.3 In the event the landlord fails to collect such fees from any such occupant and remit the same. to the City, the landlord shall .be liable to the city for payment of such fees . S .. 3251 Refuse Collection Charges . The charge for the basic level of service is hereby established as $1.50 per month. S . 3252 Fee. Debt. S . 3252.1 A fee or charge .imposed by this Chapter shall be a civil debt owing the city from the occupant of the -property to which the basic level of .service is made available whether such ser- vice is used or not. .:S . 3252. 2 . Discontinuation of refuse. service :by forms and procedures . prescribed by the Director of Finance due to vacancy or pursuant to .Section 3242.1 shall not excuse payment of all sums that have accrued under this article prior to such discontinuation. - S . 3253 Payment -and Billing. The charges provided for in this chapter shall be combined with the charges presently included in the water billing and hereafter shall be called the Utility Billing of the City of Huntington Beach. Whether the water charges alone, or the water and refuse charges together, or the refuse charge alone constitute the total of said utility .bill. Said Utility Bill shall be for .the same period as the present water bill and shall be payable. in the same manner. Failure to pay the full utility bill shall result in discontinuation of all services included in such bill. S . 3254 Accounting System. S . 3254.1 The Finance Department as collection agency for the City shall institute and maintain a system of accounting adequate and sufficient to provide complete records of refuse operations for -which charges are imposed by this chapter. S 3260 JWE COLLECTION & DISPOSAL HEALTH ARTICLE 326 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY it ..S . 3260 Certificate of Public Need and Necessity Required, It shall be and it is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person to operate or conduct --any refuse disposal service in the -City unless such -person has previously obtained a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to do so, as provided in this article , , S . 3261 Application for Certificate . Any person desiring to obtain a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity, required by this article, shall make application therefor -to -the -City Council by filing the same -with the City Clerk, Each ..application shall be accompanied by a performance bond in the amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars , as -well as a fee of Twenty-Five ($25) Dollars for the processing the . application. Said bond shall be in the form required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code :for other performance bonds . Said application shall be in writing .and shall set forth the following information: (a) Name, age , business and residence address and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural person, or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorporation, address and telephone number of its place of business and the names and addresses of its principal officers ; or -if .a_-partnership, association or unincorporation company, the names and business and residence -addresses and tele- phone numbers of the partners of the persons comprising such association or company, (b) An accurate map of the district, territory or area proposed to be serviced by the -applicant. (c) A description of the methods of operation. (d) A statement in detail as to the public need and necessity for additional refuse service in the City of Huntington Beach. (e) A statement as to what offenses including moving traffic violations , if any, any person(s) mentioned in sub-section (a) hereof, have been convicted. (This includes . a plea of guilty.) (f) A description of the -type of refuse service to- be furnished, (g) A description of the vehicles , including color, make , size, license number, and special refuse collection equipment, to be used. (h) One set of three standard size fingerprint cards bearing the finger- prints of each -person mentioned in sub-section (a)' hereof. . (i) One recent identification .photograph of each of the persons in sub-section (a) hereof. (j ) Such other information as may be required by •the City Council or the Chief of Police . HEALTH FUSE COLLECTION & DISPOSAM.1 S 3262 _ . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . S , 3262 Processing the Application for Certificate . Upon receipt of an application for Certificate of Public Need and Necessity the city clerk shall immediately forward a copy of the application of the Chief of Police who shall investigate the character, fitness and qualifications _of every• person -whose name appears on such application. Upon completion of said investigation, the Chief of Police shall transmit such application to the city administrator, together with his reasons therefor. After study, the City Administrator shall there- upon transmit such application to the City Council, together with his recommendat.inns._ upon-..s.uch..:..app.li cat; nnb..,._.,__ . ..._ __.. . S . 3263 City Council Action, Upon receipt of an application for a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity, and the recommenda- Lions of the Chief of Police and the City Administrator, the City Council, after consideration, may deny. the application, grant the same, cr modify the same , as the Council deems necessary, for the protection of the public health, safety, welfare, peace , and morals of the citizens of this city. . S . 3264 Notice to Applicant —Appeal. The City Clerk, in writing, shall notify the applicant of the Council"s decision. Within ten days after the mailing of such notification, the applicant may demand, in writing, a public hearing. If he does not do so, he shall be deemed to have consented or agreed to such denial, granting or modifi- cation of the application. S . 3265 Public Hearing Before City Council. If a demand for a public hearing is filed with the city clerk as provided in this chapter, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing within thirty days after such demand is filed. The city clerk shall serve or mail by registered or certified mail, notice of the time and place of said hearing, not less than ten days prior to the date set for public hearing, upon the City Administrator, Chief of Police, the applicant, and any person designated on the application to receive notice of the city council°s action or the public hearing. The mailing of such notice, with postage prepaid, addressed to the applicant or to such other. persons hereinabove designated, at the respective addresses specified in the application or demand for hearing shall constitute sufficient notice of such hearing. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting the power of the city council to grant a Certificate of 'Public Need and Necessity to more than one refuse collection service to operate in the same area of the city. ,So 3266 Business License Required. Every person, owning, operating or conducting a refuse collection disposal service in this city shall, in addition to and after obtaining the foregoing Certificate of Public Need and' Necessity, obtain a business license therefor and shall pay to the City the business license fee provided for by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . No such business license issued by the city to any person prior to the time such person is granted a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity. by the City Council shall be valid. S.. 3240 R E COLLECTION. & DISPOSAL.. HEALTH ARTICLE 324 .REFUSE COLLECTION S , 3240 City Contract for. Collection, The City may enter into a contract -with some responsible person to provide a basic level of service for the collection of refuse in the City at the times and in the manner prescribed in said contract which contract shall run for a period - of not more than five (5) years . The City may, in awarding such contract for collection of refuse, advertise for bids , (1365, 1380) S , 3241 Collection .by City. The City or its -authorized agent shall operate and maintain a service for the collection of refuse .from single family residences on a regular, scheduled basis approved by the City Council, provided collection shall be made at least once a week. Refuse generated and accumlated at single family residences shall be collected exclusively by the City, its duly authorized agents or employees , or by a contractor -with �whom the City may have entered into a contract for such service , provided that the owner or occupant of such residences may contract with the City, or its contractor, or any other person legally operating a refuse service in the City for the collection and removal of all materials and substances not included in this chapter as refuse and all .refuse in excess of that amount of refuse collected in the basic level of service , . S . 3242 Collection -Non Single Family, Multi-family residential, commercial and industrial units may have their refuse collected in the same manner and for the same rate as a single family residence provided the refuse generated by such unit does not exceed the .basic level of service as defined in this chapter. The owner or person in control of any such unit generating refuse in excess of the basic level of service shall contract with the City or with any person legally operating a refuse collection service in the City for -the collection of refuse in excess of the basic level of service . S . 3242.1 Upon notification of the Director of Finance upon forms supplied by said Director, the owner, or person in control of any multi-family residential, commercial or industrial unit which is contracting for refuse service shall not be liable for the charge for the basic level of service provided for in this chapter. HEALTH EFUSE COLLECTION & DISPOS�i S . 3234 .1 -S . 3234 .1 Near Alley. Where there is an alley other than a blind alley in the rear of such premises , such refuse container shall be -placed on the premises , within five feet (5' ) of the rear -property line . _S . 3234. 2 Access from Side Entrance . Where there is no alley other than :a blind alley in the rear of such premises and there is a side entrance - to the rear of such premises , each such refuse container shall .be placed on the. premises at an .accessible point adjacent to -said side entrance . S . 3234.3 On Curb. Where there is no .alley other than a blind alley in the rear of the premises nor such side entrance, each such refuse container shall be- placed on the curb in front of the premises . S . 3235 Refuse Container in Public Way. No person shall place a refuse container in any street, alley, sidewalk, court, or other public way in the City at any time -other than the regular time for collection of refuse ; every person who so places a refuse container for the purpose of refuse collection shall remove same no later than 7 P.M. or two hours after the container is emptied, whichever is later. .S . 3236 Interference with -Refuse Container.. . It is unlawful for :any person, other than the owner of .a refuse container or -any officer, agent or employee -�of said owner, . of the City, or of the- person holding a contract for collection of refuse from such container, to interfere in any manner with .any such container or to remove such con- tainer from the - location where same shall have been placed by the owner thereof, or by said owner's agent. . S . 3237 Improper Substances in Container. No person shall place or cause or -permit to be placed in any refuse container, . any substance or material other than refuse as. defined ..in this chapter . S . 3238 Moving or Conveying Refuse in .City. No person shall remove or convey or cause or permit to be removed or conveyed, any refuse on or along any.-public -street, alley, or other public place in the City except a -person legally . operating .a refuse collection service in the City as provided in this chapter. S . 3239 Vehicle for. Collection:... All vehicles used in collecting .and transporting refuse shall be. provided .with metal bodies and shall be so constructed as to be water tight -and to prevent the loss of any contents being collected or transported therein upon the streets , alleys , and other public .ways in the City. Such vehicle shall be thoroughly cleansed daily so as to -reduce or eliminate odors and decayed or rotten materials . I s S . 322003 RE��,,jE COLLECTION & DISPOSAL HEALTH So 3220.3 Collection. The collecting, gathering together, and trans- porting of refuse, for disposal in accordance with the rules and regulations pertaining to the operation of Orange County dump sites and transfer stations . So 3220.4 Refuse Container. Any container, can, receptacle, vessel, tank or box designed for or used for holding or containing refuse, So 3220. 5 Single Family Residence. Shall mean and include every lot in the City upon which is situated one dwelling unit designed for or used as living quarters by human beings . It shall not include lots with hotels , motels , lodge halls , clubs , tourist camps , trailer camps , churches , business and industrial establishments , or any - lot containing more than one dwelling unit or upon which any commercial or industrial occupation is being conducted unless such occupation is being conducted in a single family residence , So 3220.6 Person. Any individual, person, firm, corporation, partnership, copartnership, joint venture , or other organization. ARTICLE 323 COLLECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS S , 3230 Refuse Containers Required. It shall be the duty of every owner, lessee , manager, and/or person in possession, charge or control of a building on any premises in the City to provide or cause to be provided, and at all times to keep or cause to be kept, sufficient and convenient portable refuse containers upon said premises . S . 3231 Dumping of Refuse. No person shall deposit or cause or permit to be deposited, any refuse upon or in any public street, alley or -other -public place, or upon any-premises in this City, except in refuse containers as provided in this chapter. So 3232 Type and Size of Containers . Each refuse container shall be of sound construction and shall be water tight. Containers may only be used for containing animal or vegetable waste resulting from the preparation of food if they have a tight fitting cover. Containers for single -family residences shall not weigh more than sixty pounds when filled with refuse. Sa 3233 Covering Containers . The cover shall not be removed from those containers requiring covers except when necessary to }place refuse therein or to remove refuse therefrom; at all other times said cover shall be in place on said container. So 3234 Location of Container. Each refuse container -shall be kept or placed in such a manner as not to be visible from the public street and so as to be easily accessible to the refuse collector, provided that during or for the time fixed for the collection of refuse from said containers such containers shall be kept or placed as follows : HEALTH EFUSE COLLECTION & DISPOS. h .S.o. 3210( Af-3 CHAPTER 32 ~ ' -REFUSE COLLECTION AND .DISPOSAL ARTICLE 321e - GENERAL 322. DEFINITIONS 323 . - COLLECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS. 324. e REFUSE COLLECTION 325. - FEES 326 , o CERTIFICATE OF 'PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY ARTICLE 321 GENERAL (77,9099' 925, 1365) S . 3210 Owner to keep premises clear of garbage and other offensive substances . S . 3210.1 Every owner, tenant., occupant or -person owning or having care of any -premise. -shall keep said premise in a clean and sanitary condition, and no person .shall permit any sewer effluent, excre- ment, slop or stagnant water, butcher offal, market refuse, garbage, dead animal, rubbish, cans , wastepaper, filth of any kind or any other substance that may become offensive, to be ' deposited or remain in or upon any premise owned or -occupied by him or under his control except as otherwise provided bylaw, — ARTICLE 322 DEFINITIONS S . 3220 Definitions . For the purposes of this - chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings hereinafter set forth. Any word-. or -phrase -used in this chapter which is not hereinafter specifically defined shall have the meaning .commonly 'attached' to such word or phrase in ordinary usage. S . 3220.1 Refuse , Refuse shall mean and include all garbage , animal or -vegetable, or .household waste.; all combustible or in- combustive trash or waste which ordinarily is created or accumulated in the operation and maintenance of a household, business or industry, including leaves , cuttings , trimmings from trees , shrubs , grass , and filth of any kind. Refuse does not include heavy or bulky articles such as trees , tree limbs , logs , automobile bodies , large motor vehicle parts , building materials , abandoned appliances or household goods or business fixtures , grass from- renovating, sod, dirt, or similar material, or any . other substance or material that is , or may become offensive. S . 3220. 2 Basic Level of Service. That level of collection and disposal service necessary to collect the refuse generated by an average family in .one single family residence as specifically . provided in any given contract between the city and any-person for collection of such refuse , or by resolution of the City Council. 7'� _ _ BE-ALTYH DIVISION 3 DIVISION 3 HEALTH CHAPTER 31. Sanitation 32. Refuse Disposal 33. Food 34. (Repealed 706.30) 35. Huntington Beach latex- Department 36. Huntington Beach Sanitation Department HEALTH SANITATION rUAPTER 31 CHAPTER 31 SANITATION ARTICLE 311. TRASH 312,, FLIES ARTICLE 311 TRASH S 311.1. Le vi Trash 9n Public Places., No person shall deposit, sweep, grow, iscai or leave, or cause to be deposited, swept, placed, thrown, discarded or left upon any public street, highway, alley, sidewalk, street parking or other public place in this City, any paper, trash, rubbish, garbage or any other thing of similar nature (2501) S 3112a Placina Refuse for Collection. Said substances may be placed incans, boxes or other receptacles which are sufficiently tight and sound to prevent the leaking, scattering, dropping or spreading of said substances, which cans, boxes or other receptacles may be placed upon or in any public alley in this City, for the purpose of having the same removed or destroyed, by any person 4io is the tenant or in possession of the premises abutting upon the said alley, immediately adjacent to the point where said receptacles are so placed. (250a1, ARTICLE 312 FLIES Se tion 3121. The terms, "breeding place of fli.es0° as used in this article shall mean any place found to breed flies in an amount or manner such as to endanger public health or safety or to create unreasonable interference with the comfortable enjoyment of and use of Life and property by others. (799. 1) Section�3122. The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby declares that any breeding place of flies in the City of Huntington Beach which exists by reason of any condition or use made of land, organic plant, waste„ animal material, or of any other substance whatsoever, or the deposit or the storage thereof, is a public nuisance. (79901) Sect on 3123, It shall be the duty of the Health Officer, upon routine inspe'ctlon, or whenever he is informed or has reasonable cause to believe that any land, building, or collection of plant or animal waste or any substance or existing condition on any lots farm or other land or on any other premises is a breeding place of flies to enter, after demand, upon such premises and to determine by inspection whether or not there is an existing breeding place of flies.. (799A) r REAUTH SMTAT IOC Sects 3123,E Except as to residences and living quarters, the ��t o cea or his authorized deputies or inspectors for the purpose of routirne inspgction or whenever he shall have reasonable'cause to believe that any' violation of this article exists upon any premises or in any place, after displaying identification may .demand entry thereon in the day time, Every person who owns, occupies or otherwise is then in possession of such premises and who, after such display and demand, refuses or wilfully delays to open the same and admit an inspection thereof shall be guilty of as misdemeanor and subject to punishment upon conviction thereof by a fine not exceeding fifty dollars ( 50000) or by inwrisonment in the County Jail for na t over five (5) days or by both such fine and imprisonment. (799.2) Section 3122.2 The Health officer shall furnish each of his deputies and inspectors with identification in such form as he shall prescribe. (799a2) Section 3123.3 Whenever there exists in any place within the City o unt ton Beach a breeding place of flies, the Health officer shag l notify in writing the record owner or person having, control or ossession of such place or premises to abate such nuisance. (793.2) Se, c„ -ion 3123.4 The notice small direct the owner or person in contro or possession' of the place or premises, within the time specified in said notice, to abate the nuisance and to perform any and 611 work necessary to prevent the recurrence thereof in the places or premises specified in the notice. (799a2 Section2, 5 The notice shall be served upon the owner of recor or person having control or possession of the place or premises upon which the nuisance exists, or upon the agent of either. (799.2) Sa�� Notices aasy be served byy person aauth. ori.za.d y the Health officer for such ppua�se in tine same manner as a summons in a civil action. (799,2) Sect n=3 3 7 Upon the neglect or refusal of the owner, or the pew havingcontrol or possession of any place or premises to comply with the notice to abate,, the health Officer may abate such nuisance and the owner of such place or premises, or the person having control or possession thereof, shall be liable to the City of Huntington Beach for. the costs of such abatement which may be recovered in a civil action. (79902) S_ec .t.1on _,a1Z3& In the event the health officer elects to abate any such nuisance, he shall serve or cause to be served upon the record owner or the person in control or possession of the premises a "Notice of Intention to Abate" and if a hearing is not requested before the City Cousmcil as hereinafter provided within ten (10) days after service of said "Notice of Intention to AbatetQ, the Health offices may proceed to abate any such nui- sance as hereinabove provided. (799.2) J VIFALTH "'ANITATION S .312 Section T' e t 4'o r utg, f'a,,A I be in wri It.in� and lZ,_?i_Iej- hi e 2 1 t y e't tWfe ane. plac.e i�! r:V I- vu the City Council wilt con.sid---r the :n�i t L c r hall _,ea. -naileivi by r-hi.. City Cleek to the rappl Icant. cird -Io 0he R-sm'!Uft At the time fixed for the hearing, the. City II hear and consider all relevant testi-arin), trad evidence relatitv to the matter as offered by the applicant and by the Healch Officer, Upon the conclusion of the hearing the City Council ts-hall. deterraine whether or not a C0110iti0il CO-Altfary -'%-() L"Ne provisions of this article exists and wthethe� or mt the Iiealth Officer may abate., (799,, 2) Section 3123, 10 Arty owner or person having control, of any place or premises upon which chere is existing a breeding place for flies , who refuses or neglects to abate the same or to take corrective measures to prevent its recurrence in acc- ordance with the written notice from the Health Officer with- in the time specified in said notice, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to punishment upon convirtion thereof by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500, 00) or one hundred (100) days imp-risonment in the County Jai]- , or by both such fine and impriaos-inent , (709- 2) Section 3123- 11 Provisions of this article in reference to abG_Ee�ment are to be cons trjed as an added remedy of abatement of the )-riulsance hereby declared and not in conflict or dett)ga- tion of any other actions ove proceeding : or remedies otherwise provided by law,, (799. 2) HEALTH REFUSE DISPOSAL CHAPTER 32 CHAPTER 32 REFUSE DISPOSAL ARTICLE 320, GENERAL 321 . GARBAGE CANS 322. TRASH CANS 323. REMOVAL OF REFUSE ARTICLE 320 GENERAL S�32.00, Definitions . In this Chapter; S 3200A °° Garba a 41 is all animal and vegetable refuse lftom kitchens , and all househ3ld waste that. shall have been prepared for or intended to be used as food or shall have resulted froytt the pre- partition of food,, S 3200.2 01 Tr s4n4 f° other than garbage is any other re€use sur- as tin ea lass Q old clothes, etc. (77, 1) S 3200 . " Collection " is the operation of gathering to- gether and transporting to a point of disposal, of garbage or trash,. either individually or combined, and in accordance with the •ute and regulations pertaining to the operation of Orange County Dump. sites and transfer station. (925. 1) .S 3200.4. Schedule of Collection. The City or its authorized agent shall operate the collection service on a regular, schedulEd . basis, subject to approval. by the City Council, Collection shal '. be made at least twice weekly. (925o1) S 3200 . °A Collector " is the City of Huntington Beach or the person, persons firm or corporation entering into a contract with the City for the collection of trash and garbage, (925 1. S 3200 6 ' Container `" is an approved receptacle as Stated in SectC ons'` ll, �2 ,2, All residents shall comply with foregoing sections except that, (a) for residences equipped wit.la garbage disposal. units than deliver garbage to the sanitary. eu.yeris no garbage can need be provided, (b) wrapper!., dry garbage rit;y bi placed in trash containers from time to time* said wrapptn R .sf done in a manner that prohibits leakage into the trash ca*fl; r: when the resident cansist:e?fatly places garbage in a trash ctir ::- a r 5a;_d containers all meet all of the requireme,T t.s of Section 1212o J HEALTH REFUSE DISPOSAL S 32O1. No person shall place a container for or containing garbage and/or trash in any street, alley, or other public highway of the City at any time other than the regular time of collection and V.iery person shall remove said container (s) to his own premises no than 7 P.M. or two hours after the container is emptied, whichever is later. Trash containers, when not set out .on a street or highway for collection, shall be located in a place or manner so not to be vis— ible from the public street. (925, 1) S 3201, Specifications for Collection Vehicle Bodies, All vehicle din collectIng and transporting gar ahe or combined garbage and trash shall be provided with metal bodies which shall be kept water tight at all times and thoroughly cleansed daily. All vehicles used in collecting and transporting trash or combine:: trash and garbage shall be provided with bodies so constructs, Gs to prevent the loss of any contents bean transported therein upon the streets, alleys and highways. (925. SSS 32O2 Service F es All residential, commercial and indust- rial units shall be provided, at no cost, .with basic trash service. Basic trash service is defined as that service that does not exceed the normal quantity of trash generated by one single family residence. When the trash service required by any commercial or industrial. exceeds the basic service, a fee shall be charged which shall be determined by the City. The fee shall be a reasonable fee, based upon a standard according to the volume of collection which shall be proportionate to the average volume generated by rnsidenti.al units and proportionate to the cost for residential units. Fees shall be determined by a committee composed of the City Engineer and two members of. the City Council and based upon the above stane- ards o Any person or firm may appeal the charge de%. to i s City Council and the decision of the City Council shall be final, ARTICLE 321 GARBAGE CANS S 3211.,. Garbpje Cans Required a It shall. be the duty of e"Ier owner, manager or person R in possession, charge or cortt:ml of a-r4Jr board inghyouse, restaurant lintel, apartment or eating; house, an-0 of every person occupying a Awelling or flat Within this Ci.tr, to nro- vide or causes to be provided, and at All times to keels or caiise to l;e lrept,pr, In this Chapter prescribed, convenient portable Vessels, tenks or receptacles for bolding garbage;and no other: vessel by ised for. garbage. in this City. (77 s 3) S 321 Tvr,�_e Size of, Cho Each such vessel., tank, -or re-e— tr-sele ss�rall be of a �o�a�:sd sty=le approved by the Board of Health of this Cit Arid sbi-ill be constructed of metal and shall b--e ware-T- , tivht 7 sh;0.1 i::`. s°) cx—)^`;try cted. as to ar:rnrairj vot: less t1-ires~ no- rr)r than (16) gallons ,s , mad shall. be pr.'ov d4.'d 4 �:aj.£:*1 _ ���l�C.a.': (�� �;i�`Lt�.i.t�� �'j1 ''.�lt_ ."tY .f�.�"..-".� i�t3�.riryS1'i r�3i� �t""s<'�L� C:.`;%ve ea NFALTH REFUSE DISPOSAL S 3213. 321.3. Cow ine of Canso Such cover shall not be re-,*ved except i ea�e necessary tp place garbage therein or to renmve garbage therefrom; and at all other times said cover is to be in place on; said tank, vessel or receptacle. (77:3) S 3214 Location of Canso Each such vessel, tank or receptacle shall- e t or p ate in. t e manner following. (77e3) S 3214.1 Near Al a Where there is an alley other than a blind al. ey in _ffie rear of such premises, such vessel, tank or re- ceptacle shall be placed on the premises, within five feet (-9)of the rear property line. (77:3) S J21.4 0 2. Accesg from Side Entrance. Where there is no alley o then .a blind alley in t e rear o f suic premises and there is a side entrance to the rearof such premises, each such vessel, tank, or receptacle shall be placed on the premises at art accessible point adjacent to said side entrance. (7703) (925.2) S 3214. 3. On Curb. Where there is no alley other than a blind alley n t e rear o t e premises nor such side entrance, each such vessel, tank or receptacle, shall be placed on the curb in front of the premises, (77.3) S 3215. Time for Placin . All such depositing of garbage cans to be cnade during or for the time fixed for the collection of garb&ge therefrom and to be ,accessible to the garbage collector at such time. (77.3) (925o2) S . 2 6, Interference with G rbage Cgnsa It is unlawful for any person, other tin t.Ge c ,64n►er o sa1.d receptacle or. any officer or enployee of this City, tar, an employee of Ole person holding a contract with this City for collection, removal and disposal of garbage, to interfere in any manner with any such garbage vessel, tank or• recepn tacle. (77.5) S 217. Ptacing Ictrorover Substaai es in Garb ,e Cans. Igo person shall. place or. cause, or permit to be glace�a y .s�� garbage vessel, tarok or receptacle any substance other than garbage, (77. 5) ARTICLE, 322 TRASH CANS L32U. ',ZAsh Carms:.TIMM .red. It shall. be One duty of every owner, manager or persons in possession, charge or control of any boardinghouse, restaurant, hotel., apartment eat}ng houxsti, and every- person occupying a dwelling or flat within this City, to provide or Cause to be provided, and at all times to' ]seep or cause to be kept, convenient portable vessels, tanks, receptsci s or boxes. fear holding trash, (77.4) 5 3221. 5,� �..a d Sipe mf Ca:aa : c'-, such portable vessel, tank, receptacle or br a; shall We of sound construction and shall. not weigh more than 75 pounds when .charged w-1th trash., (925. 1) HEALTH REFUSE DISPOSAL S 3222, S 3222. Location of Trash Cans. Each such receptacle for trash to be accessible to the collector, when called for, by being placed alongside the garbage receptacles mentioned in Article 321. (77,4) , (92502) Ste, Limitation gf Service Heavy articles such as trees , logs' auto bodes, building materials, grass from renovating, sock, dirt, or similar material will not be picked up on regular collet- tiono Arrangements may be made with the Engineering Department for collecting this material and a charge will be assessed dep endsrs; upon the quantity,, weight and character of such materials. (925e1 ) ARTICLE 323 REMOVAL OF REFUSE S 2231. DS=inS of Refuse in City. No person shall deposit or cause or permit to be deposited, any garbage or trash upon or in any public street alley or other public place, or upon any premis- es in this City, 17706) SSS 3232. Moving of Garba a throu&h Cit , No person shall re- move or convey or cal >e or permit to be removed or conveyed any garbage on or aloegg ,y public street, alley or other public plane in this City. (7702) S 32330- Authorized HaulinR of Carba en Section 3232. shall. not: apply to any person with om this City has entered into a contract for the collection, removal and disposal of garbage or to any em- ployee of such contractor during such time as such contract shall be in force, (7702) S 3234. Collection Contract, The City may enter into a contract with some responsible contractor to collect trash and garbage from the various trash and garbage cans or receptacles in the City, at the times and in the manner prescribed in said contract, which con- tract shall run for a period of not more than five (5) years, and which contract shall be accompanied by a bond in the penal sum to be fixed by the cominittee composed of the City Engineer and two council- mer, to the effect that the con `.rector shall faithfully perform his contract and `-onply with all Cie ordinances of this Cityp relatifif; to the care and control of garbage, refuse filth and trash, (660. 1) . (9t5,2) S 3235o Clallinq for. Bids The City may, in awarding such con- trac— au ng gar age an trash as herein provided, advertise the same for bids. (77.7) i HEAz.T :.fug'USE DISPGSAL._ S '3241 ARTICLE 324 S 32410 Certificate of Public Need and Necess . Required. It shalt be nd it is hereby decW...ared to be uulaw -ul for any p son, firm, or corporation to operate or conduct any trash and garbage disposal ser- vice in the City of Huntington Beach unless such .person, firm, or corporation has previously obtained a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to do soy as provided for in this Article. (909a2) S 324101. Age i- cation for Certificate of Public Need and 1Lecessity, Any person, firm, or corporation desiring to obtain a 'erti icate of Public Need and Necessity, required by :his Article, shall make application therefor to the City Council by filing the same with the City Clerk. Each application shall be accompanied by a performance bond in the amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollars, as well as a fee of five Dollars ($5.00) for filing of the said application. Said bond shall be in the same form as required in Section 2102.11 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, Said application shall be in writing and shall, among other things, set forth the following,. (1) Name, age, business and residence address of the applicant, if a natural person; or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorporation, address of its place of business and the names and addresses of its principal officers; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated company, the names and residence addresses of the partners -or of the partners or of the persons comprising such association or company. (2) An accurate map of the distract, territory or area proposed to be served by the trash and garbage service. (3) A description of the methods of operation, (4) A statement in detail as to the public need and .necessity for additional trash and garbage service in the City of Huntington Beach. (5) A statement as to what offenses, if any, any person (s) mentioned in subsections (1) hereof, havebeen convicted. (6) A description of the type of trash and garbage service to be furnished (7) A description of the vehicles , including colar,make, size and special garbage and crash collection equipment to be furnished (8) One set of three standard size fingerprint cards bearing the fingerprints of each person mentioned in subsection (1) hereof, (9) One identification photo raph of each of the persons mentioned in subsection �l) hereof, (10) Such other information as may be fi-egk,_ired by the City Council or Cheer of Police. (909.2) REFUSE UISPOSA. S SS 3242. Grand R Certificate of Public Need-and Necessity-, on r T1 Upeceipt of an application fora �er$i ic-ste of Public deed and Necessity, the City Clerk shall immediately refer and forward the application to the Chief of Police who shall investigate the character, fitness and qualifications of every person whose name appears on such application, Upon completion of said investigation, the Chief of Police shall transmiC such application to the City Administrators together with his recommendations that the Certificate b-e granted or denied. together with his reasons therefor, After study, the City Administrator shall thereupon transmit such application to the City Council, together with his recommendations in connection therewith, (b) Upon receipt of an application for a Cert-ificate of Public Need and Necessity to conduct or operate a trash and garbage disposal service, the City Council after consideration shall either grant .the same to the full extent requested, or it shall notify the applicant that the Council intends to deny the application or to grant the application, but permit operation of the trash and garbage disposal service in only a portion of the territory. W-'Rhin five days after such notification, applicant may demand . a public hearing. If he does not do so, he shah. be deemed to have consented or agreed to such denial or granting of the Certificate. (c) Within thirty (30) days after an applicant for a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to conduct a trash and garbage disposal service, files with the City Council a demand for a public hearing, the City Council shall hold such public hearing and shall serve notice of the time and place thereof, five (5) days prior to the public hearing, upon the City Administrator, Chief of Police upon the applicant and upon, av=ery person named in Section 3241A (15 and named in the application, whom the City Council :intends not to ! allow to act as such. The mailing of such notice, with postage prepaid, addressed to the applicant and to those persons named in the application and required by Section .3241a1 (1) hereof, at the respective addresses specified in the application, shall constitute sufficient notice of such hearing.Not:fin herein shall be construed as limiting the power of the City Council to giant a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to more than onee `neash and garbage disposal service to operate in the same area. (`09.2) S 3242.10 Business License Required. Every person, fir-m or corporation oiming, oerati�:g or con uciing a garbage and trash disposal service in tfis City shall, in addition to and after obtaining the foregoing Certificate of geed and Nece>silty, obtain a business license therefor and shall pay to the City the business license fee provided for by Ordinance of this City. No such business license shall be issued by the City to any person 3mtil such persona is granted a Certificate of Public Deed and Necessity by the C1oty Council. (9Q9o2) REQUbbT FOR CITY COUNCIL--ACTION Submitted by Paul E Cook Department Public Works Date Prepared Nov 13 , 19 8 00 Backup Material Attached 0 Yet No Subject Use of 1980 Litter Control Grant Funds City Administrator s Comments By GITX G®UNGIL Approve as Recommended CITY Statement of Issue Recommendation, Analysis Funding Source Alternative Actions -U Statement of Issue u The Public Works staff has proposed that litter control grant funds ob- tained under the State Solid Waste Management Act of 1980 be expended for the purchase of Wakefield double litter can holders This proposal has been endorsed by the Environmental Board Recommendation Approve the application Analysis The high cost of trash collection in our park system is compounded by the vulnerability of our existing free standing trash containers to vandalism These containers are often dumped out, thrown into lakes or channels , or even stolen by vandals This could be prevented by the installation of a device known as the Wakefield double litter can holder About 100 of the new holders can be purchased and installed in key problem areas with the $15, 000 granted by the 1980 Act Funding Source State Solid Waste Management Board $15, 000 00 Alternative Action Do not fund holders Develop other ways in which to expend the funds PEC JS jy v / P10 3178 CITY OF HUNTINGTON .BEACH C P.O. BOX 190 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CALIFORNIA92648 BUILDING DIVISION(714)536-5241 PLANNING DIVISION(714)536-5271 November 7, 1980 Daryl D. Smith Superintendent Parks, Trees and Landscape City of Huntington Beach Dear Daryl: The Environmental Board at the last regular meeting (November 6, 1980) endorsed the proposal for the expenditure of the City allotment of State Litter Grant 180/181 funds (S.B. 261) for litter can holders in the City parks. The Environmental Board has long recognized the problem of litter and vandalism in the City parks and feels that this is a very positive step toward better control of this problem. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. We look forward to working with you on future environmental enhancement projects. Very truly yours, Irwin Haydock, , Phd. Chairman Environmental Board IH:MA:gc 43 , z6 �i• J@ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - - To Jeri Chenelle Froen Paul E. Cook . Administrative Analyst Sr. Director of Public Works Subject Litter Control on Pacific Date November 19, 1980 Coast Highway J We have been considering two solutions to the litter problem along Pacific Coast Highway as follows: 1. Prohibit parking where curb and gutter does not exist on both sides of P.C.H. from Warner Ave. to the bluffs and from Beach Blvd. to the Santa Ana River. This regulation must be approved by CALTRANS and they are not receptive to it at this time.. It would also be opposed by proponents of more beach access such as the Coastal Commission. We intend to do a detailed study on the safety aspects of park ing. on P.C.H. with accident statistics, photos, etc. and present them to CALTRANS. If they then support parking restrictions, we will ask the City Council to approve it. If_ parking is prohibited along the unimproved sections of P.C.H. , I anticipate that 80% of the litter problem will be solved. 2. Hire two full-time maintenance workers to pick up litter on P.C.H. and Beach Blvd. at CALTRANS expense. This proposal was. . , included in our draft State Highway Maintenance Agreement. CALTRANS is still considering it. If they agree to accept these costs and the City Council .will approve the Agreement, I will request the additional personnel. If. CALTRANS won't accept this . . responsibility, I will inform the City Council and they may wish to take the matter to a higher State authority. I will keep the City Council informed when there is more to report in either of these solutions to the P.C.H. litter problem. PEC: jy REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTI !3 Paul E. Cook e Public Works Submitted by Department Date Prepared Sept. 25 , 19 80 Backup Material Attached QX Yet No Subject Litter Grant Revision City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Approve as recommended. � CITY CL Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: The Environmental Board has recommended a revision in the expenditure of SB 650 Litter Control Grant funds. Council approval is required to amend the contract with the State. Recommended Action: 1. Accept the recommendation. 2. Approve the revised project budget. Analysis: The City is currently utilizing a SB 650 Litter Control Grant of $24 ,953 .00 to assist in the cleanup of the downtown area. The original proposal called for a program which combined the purchase of litter receptacles with a public litter control campaign. The new receptacles have been well received, but interest in a cleanup campaign has dwindled. After consulting with staff, the Environmental Board made the recommendation (Minutes, Sept. 11, 1980) that the remaining funds ($16 ,903. 00) be reallo- cated to .l) purchase 35 additional receptacles, and (2) contract with the Orange County Youth Authority for the provision of 24 weekend cleanup crews between now and June 30, 1981. This proposal is acceptable to the State Solid Waste Management Board. Alternative Action: Do not accept the proposal and promote a public cleanup campaign between now and Dec. 31, 1980. Funding Source: State of California $24 ,953. 00 PEC:JS: jy P10 3/79 LITTER GRANT PROJECT BUDGET Account Description Funding 898221 Supplies, Special $ 1,000. 00 . 898240 Supplies, Shop $ 2 ,529. 00 898398 Cont. Svcs. , Refuse $ 3,000. 00 898659 Litter Receptacles $18 ,424. 00 $24 ,953. 00 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA 8 0-36 Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department Administration Date Prepared aril 7 01980 Backup Material Attached Yes MX .No Subject City Council Ad hoc Committee for Refuse Collection Negotiations City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended ------ - ------ :::.gam Ale — Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue The Refuse Collection Contract between the . City and Rainbow Disposal Company will terminate on July 31 , 1980 . The City Administrator has appointed a Staff Ad hoc Negotiating Committee. To foster a close working relationship between the City Staff and City Council , there is need for a City Council Ad hoc Committee to act as liaison between staff and council during the negotiation for city refuse collection. Recommendation Appoint a three member City Council Ad hoc Committee to act as liaison between City Staff and City Council during the negotiations concerning refuse collection. Analysis The City Administrator has selected a Staff Negotiating Committee consist- ing of Paul Cook, Director of Public Works , Bill Amsbary, Assistant City Attorney, Richard Barnard, Administrative Assistant , and Warren Hall , 'City Treasurer. The Committee ' s purpose will be to explore options that are available to the City related to refuse collection and to present a recommendation to the City Council for their considerations and action. To insure a close working relationship between the City Staff and City Council , the City Administrator requests that the Council select a three member Ad hoc Committee to act as liaison to the Staff Committee . Funding Source No funds required. Alternatives Not to select Councilpersons to participate on an Ad hoc Committee during refuse negotiations . Plo V79 4 REQUES i" FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by H. E. Hartge lW#/ Department Public Works Date Prepared Jan. 17 , 19 79, Backup Material Attached Q Yes ® No Subject Solid Waste Management User Fees City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended . �9 4, . S- Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement or issue: The office of auditor-controller of Orange County requests City comment re- garding potential impact of a possible user fee applied to each ton of refuse deposited at the County dump or at a transfer station. Recommendation: Oppose the proposed user fees unless the following conditions are satisfied: 1. A uniform fee per ton is applied throughout the County regardless of whether the solid waste is deposited at a transfer station or at the dump site. 2. The hours of operation of the transfer stations be increased to coincide with the basic hours of refuse collection within the area served by the L transfer station. dz 3. The applied fee be reduced proportionately to the receipt of anv future Federal grant or State subvention or to any future income from resource recovery. Analysis: ; Since its inception some years ago the Solid Waste Management Program in Orange County has been supported by the General Fund. The plan presently under consideration would establish user fees varying from $2 . 50 to $5. 50 per ton, depending upon the type of refuse, the place of dumping (dumpsite or transfer station) and the fee option selected for the support of the program. . The Revenue Search Committee of the County of Orange requests that each city within the County submit their views on the proposal so they in turn can prepare their report to the Board of Supervisors. Alternative: Request that the County continue supporting the Solid Waste Management Program from General Fund monies on the premise that such service is directly related to the use of property and should therefore be supported from property taxes. Funding Source: The residential rate for the collection of household refuse will be increased from the present $2. 64 per unit per month to $2 .77 per unit per month May 1, 1979. The effect of the proposed user fee by the. County of Orange will Plo V78 �, J . J Request for Council Action Solid Waste Management User Fees January 17, 1979 Page 2 increase the $2. 77 per unit per month rate to $3 . 32 at a minimum and possibly to $3. 50 or more, depending upon final determinations. There- fore, the effect of the proposed User Fee could increase the annual General Fund support of refuse collection in our City by approximately $378 , 000 over the $1, 208 , 000 we are currently paying. HEH:MZ : jy IY i.: 6 u;l CITIES ANAHEIM p'� BBREA UENA PARK ®ran ge Cou It M Division COSTA MESA J CYPRESS FULLER TON ALLEY LEAGUE FOUNTAIN �F LIF®RNIA CITIES GARDEN GROVE HUNTINGTON BEACH 811 NORTH BROADWAY,SUITE 614,SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 9270 14)835-4501 IRVINE a LAGUNA BEACH LA HABRA LA PALMA LOSALAMITOS NEWPORT BEACH Jq f } P ACENTIA C�TY Lr ORANGE .J V SAN JUAN CAP STRAND �Tanuary 29,. 197�D/yj F 80'- fr� SANTA ANA �N�S'1 p�,/��r� �C STANTON SEAL CH �W O y TUSTI N �CF VILLA PARK WESTMINSTER YORBA LINDA TO: City Managers . FROM: Bob Wynn, Chairman, Solid Waste Committee RE: Solid Waste Management User Fee Proposal A joint committee of three City' Managers and three City Engineers met twice in the last two weeks and approved the enclosed Position Paper regarding the Solid Waste Management User--.Fee Proposal. The City Managers Association will be asked to approve and/or amend the Position Paper for consideration at the League meeting February 8. Please be prepared to discuss this paper on February 1 at the City Managers breakfast. - � 3 MEMBER CITIES ANAHEIMBREA BUENA PARK Oran Orange County Division . COSTA MESA . CYPRESS FULLERTON LEACJUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES FOUNTAIN VALLEY GARDEN GROVE HUNTING TON BEACH . 811 NORTH BROADWAY,SUITE 614,SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92701 (714)835-4501 IRVINE LAGUNA BEACH LA HABRA LA PAL MA LOS ALAMITOS JOINT SOLID WASTE COMMITTEE REPORT NEWPORT BEACH ORANGE PLACENTIA Orange County City Managers' Association: Bob Wynn, (Chairman) SAN CLEMENTE Art Simonian, Carl Berry SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO SANTA SEAL BEACH Orange County City Engineers' Association: Thornton Piersall, STANTON Wayne Osborne., Brent Muchow TUSTIN VILLA PARK Staff: Bob Haskell, Executive Director WESTMINSTER YORBA LINDA January 26, 1979 RECOMMENDATION The Solid Waste Management System in Orange County is unique, efficient, and effective. We see no reason to alter the current program in any way. Therefore, we oppose the proposed Solid Waste Management User Fee alternative currently under consideration by the Board of Supervisors. THE CURRENT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM In 1969, the Board of Supervisors approved the first Solid Waste Management Plan for the County of Orange. The Solid Waste Management System established by this plan was to be funded through the General Fund "whereby the cost of the program is shared by all property owners in the County." This same funding arrangement exists today. The present policy of "no fee" disposal accomplishes the following: 1. Provides for a means of disposing of solid waste materials. 2. Eliminates/minimizes health and safety hazards by encouraging (without fee) the proper disposal of solid waste. 3 . Minimizes the improper disposal of solid waste along roadsides, vacant lots, and undeveloped outlying areas. 4. Minimizes litter clean-up and costs associated therewith. 5. Assigns to cities the responsibility of contracting (or providing) and funding, solid waste collection services. THE PROPOSED USER FEE SYSTEM The User Fee System would no longer treat solid waste management as a property- related expense, thus forcing cities to impose a tax or fee on their citizens to pay more money for the same service they hove been receiving for years. The proposed system would mandate the County's purchase and installation of scales at the County's four landfill sites at a cost of approximately $600,000. Fees would be based on tonnage. Each load would be weighted and the fee determined. Fee options presented in the plan range from $3.50 per ton to $2.50 per ton for general refuse and $5.50 to $5.50 per ton for . '1 disposal at a transfer station. Additional employee requirements created by this proposal would necessitate spending $500,000 more in salaries and benefits next year and each year thereafter. The fees, paid to the County by the contractors, then reimbursed by the cities, and finally, if possible, passed along to the taxpayers, would go into a special "Enterprise Fund". In Option I of the User Fee proposal, the Enterprise Fund would generate enough money to ppLy all salaries, benefits, costs associated with the scales, all other capital expenditures, the depreciation of capital assets, all operating expenses, a "reasonable" reserve for capital improvements and equipment, repayment to the County General Fund for "its initial equipment investment" (approximately $2,000,000) , and $700,000 annually to the County General Fund for "overhead". The total program budget would be $9,272,319 compared to the current budget of approximately $8,250,000 -- a 12% increase in costs. Land acquisition would not be included as an Enterprise Fund expense, since the remain- ing land acquisition for the next 10 years has already been budgeted for this fiscal year using primarily revenue sharing funds. Option II of the proposed User Fee Plan would also deposit fees (slightly less than under Option I) in an Enterprise Fund that would cover all of the ex- penses mentioned above except reserves for capital improvements and equipment. The proposed Option II budget is $7,500,000. The difference between Option I and Option II would presumably be made up by the General Fund. The average cost of collection in the County is $30.00 per household per year. The User Fee'Plan suggests that Option I would add $6.40 more annually per household in the County to the collection cost,.-- a 21% increase in the cost. Option II would add $4.99 annually to each households bill -- a 17% increase. It should be noted here that two landfill sites, Coyote Canyon and Santiago, are leased from the Irvine Company. When the County signed the leases (in 1963 and 1967 respectively) a provision was added to each lease stating, "In the event Lessee shall impose any charge, fee or rental upon any person, firm or corporation for the right or privilege to dispose of trash on the lease premises, a sum equal to twenty=five percent (25%) of all such gross receipts" shall be paid to the lessor (the Irvine Company) . In the proposed User Fee Plan, the Irvine Company would earn $886,981 from Option I user fees and $667,089 from Option II user fees, annually. County staff reports that the Irvine Company has indicated that they would be "willing to consider" a lease amendment. If this were accomplished, costs per ton would be reduced by 25� in both options but would reflect only very minor per, household savings. County staff has recommended implementation of the User Fee System on July 1, 1979. ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED USER FEE SYSTEM As far as can be determined, there is really only one major advantage to implementation of a Solid Waste Management User Fee System: financial benefit to the County Government. By shifting the costs of this program to cities and taxpayers, the County General Fund will have approximately $8,250,000 plus ad- ditional revenue from overhead charges and payments received for equipment (ap- -2- b� proximately $1,000,000 annually) from the new Enterprise Fund to use in other program areas threatened by post-Proposition 13 budget cuts. Additional benefits noted by County staff include the fact that charging for disposal at landfill sites will: 1. reduce the amount of solid wastes illegally brought in from out-of-county for free disposal. In fact, Orange County is the only urban county in the state that finances its Solid Waste Disposal System entirely from property taxes (or more corectly, the County General Fund) ; 2. "also reduce air pollution by discouraging trips to the landfills." DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED USER FEE SYSTEM While the proposed User Fee System may help the County Government financially, it will hurt taxpayers, cities, and the successful solid waste system we have built up over the years. Some of the disadvantages of the proposed plan are listed below: 1. User fees would tend to discourage (in particular those who cannot afford or are unwilling to pay) the proper and safe disposal of solid waste. 2. By virtue of item number one above, encourages the proliferation of solid waste materials and litter along roadways, vacant lots, and undeveloped outlying areas. EXAMPLE: It is estimated that Orange County generates approximately 3 lbs. of solid waste per person per day. This translates (Orange County population at 1.8 million) to approximately 2 billion lbs. of trash per year. If only one tenth of one percent (.001%) of the County's total population choose to evade fees by improper disposal, the result- ant litter would amount to approximately 2 million lbs. of solid waste along roadways, vacant lots, etc. What are the costa associated with clean-up? What are the health hazards? Will the revenues generated by fees be sufficient to offset the cost of litter abatement? 3. Direct costs to cities would be the costs incurred in removing unlawfully deposited material on vacant public and private property. 4. Cities would also face direct costs associated with dumping of street sweeping, street repair, and landscape maintenance debris. EXAMPLE: The direct costs noted above are estimated to be $20,000 an- nually for the City of Fullerton. 5. The proposed system would increase overhead and administration for the entire program on cities, contractors, and the County, resulting in higher costs to the taxpayers. 6. Although County staff estimates. that the total increase in property owner payments will average 17%, the figures vary considerably from city to city. EXAMPLE: The City of Irvine, located near a landfill site, estimates a total increase to their taxpayers' bills of 41%. On the other hand, V Seal Beach, using a transfer station, estimates an average increase of 60% on their taxpayers' bills. 7. Approval of user fees would merely shift the political liability and significant costs from the County to the cities (twenty-five of which were also affected by Proposition 13) . 8. Our estimates-indicate that the additional overhead and equipment costs necessary for the user fee system would, over a ten year period, increase the cost of the Solid Waste Management System by about $10,000,000 . This is a perfect example of bureaucratic waste and government growth at the expense of the taxpayers in this County. 9. Citizens and city governments will be facing new fees for the same service they have been receiving without any improvement in that service. 10. It is, and has been over the years, widely recognized that solid waste disposal is definitely a property-related expense and thus, should be funded by the property tax. Other county services specially provided to certain groups of citizens may better lend themselves to the user fee concept. 11. The adverse reation of citizens to the recent attempt by the Orange County Sanitation District to impose user fees to offset sewage treat- ment costs attests strongly to the level of opposition which would be created should solid waste user fees be instituted. The potential for such widespread opposition must be constantly borne in mind when proposals such as this are being discussed. 12. The User Fee Plan proposes to use scales at the landfill sites or (until scales are installed) a system of load checking. Either system will result in delays -- and, if such delays equate with or exceed the traditional delays at the transfer stations, then a new and additional cost factor has been conceived, and must be passed on to the cities and/or taxpayers. Such delays would impinge directly on the contractor's ability to ef- fectively and efficiently deliver the service. i 13. Recent passage of Proposition 13 has imposed new legal restrictions on fees charged by local governments for refuse collection. Section 4 of Proposition 13 requires a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors in order to impose "special taxes' The legal staff of the League of California Cities in Sacramento advises us that "special taxes" can be reasonably said to include any kind of exise tax except "a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of real property." In the City of Glendale v. Trondsen (48 Cal.2d 93) , the court ruled that garbage or rubbish charges based on occupancy were deemed supportable under the city's taxing power and catagorized as an exise tax. Thus, cities currently operating under the same revenue limitations imposed by Proposition 13, as the County, may be prohibited from passing the fees on to property., owners. Cities in this county simply do not have the adequate resources that would be necessary to absorb these enormous costs. With legal issues such as this unresolved, any user fee proposal is viewed as ex-`- .tremely premature. -4- m - � 14. We sympathize with, and support the County's continuing opposition to increasing State and Federal mandates that do not provide available funding. Cities have been in the forefront of the battle to curtail such unnecessary mandates. Therefore, we find it particularly disturb- ing to learn that the County would ignore its past policy on such matters and consider passing additional costs on down the line to cities. 15. In addition to the possibility of several cities being forced to absorb the total costs of the proposed disposal fees, the City of Newport Beach would definitely be forced to bear the cost out of their General Fund. The City is directly prohibited by its charter from assessing any fee for the collection and disposal of refuse. The fees alone would necessitate appropriating from $105,750 to $258,500 annually to the. County. 16. The County should require an Environmental Impact Report for the User Fee Plan prior to consideration by the Board. Further, a cost/revenue analysis should be prepared, investigating the added cost of increased clean-up operations. 17. The concept of resource recovery should be more aggressively pursued. With energy costs steadily on the rise, a recycling plan or automated resource recovery plant might offset operation costs in the future. 18. Prior to any adoption of the User Fee Plan, the Board of Supervisors should hold public hearings on the proposal to enable citizens, organiza- tions, contractors, cities, sanitation district, etc., to make their views known. 19. The County should not implement a User Fee Plan unless they are prepared to assume the responsibility and expense for the additional litter clean-up that would be required throughout the County. g -5- 1/3 �4"ieEnvironmental @ouncil to CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON8FACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Environmental Board DATE: January 26, 1979 � SUBJECT: PITCH IN LITTER CONTROL PROGRAM r� Recent Environmental Board discussions have focused on an evaluation of the need for the City of Huntington Beach to adopt a positive litter control program. Some examples considered were the "Keep America,,Beautiful" and the "Pitch In For Positive Litter Reduction" programs already established in several cities as well as more localized efforts as outlined in your recently approved grant applicati.on.. under SB650 (Solid Waste Management Act) in support of the merchants association clean-up of the downtown area. Q� As part of our overall assessment of needs, Environmental Board member Erwin Newton and I made a preliminary litter survey of this city on December 8th, encompassing many areas and potential litter sources. We would like to share with you some of our initial findings (see attached notes of 12/8/78) ; this survey was made to provide a basis for identifying local litter concerns and to serve as a guide for substantial reduction of identified litter sources . After considerable fact-finding and debate on the matter, the Environmental Board passed a resolution on December 14, 1978 , recommending that the City of Huntington Beach adopt the "Pitch In `Eo.r Positive Litter Control" program. For your consideration and action, we have attached: 1) a brief description of the "Pitch In" program; 2) a fact sheet summarizing the major program elements; and 3) a more detailed analysis of program development. We have also sent this same material and, in addition, some more detailed guidelines of individual program elements to the Huntington Beach Planning Department for .f.urther consideration. The Huntington Beach Environmental Board urges you to carefully consider the real need for a positive program of litter control and we would recommend that you direct Staff to evaluate the ."Pitch In For Positive Litter Control" Program with an eye to its eventual adoption as one of the major program elements for keeping the City of Huntington Beach a clean and beautiful living environment. R ectfully submitted, • Irwin Haydoc�0 Chairman /'� NOTES ON A LITTER SURVEY CONDUCTED 9 A.M. - 1 P.M. SATURDAY DECEMBER 8, 1978 . Erwin Newton & Irwin Haydock Litter in Huntington Beach clearly stems from five of the lively sources; improper commercial refuse putouts; improper household refuse putouts, pedestrians, motorists, and construction projects . Inadequately covered trucks do not appear to be a major source and loading/unloading operations , while in need of improvement, are reasonably good. A brief description of problem areas follows : Downtown Commercial - There are, of course exceptions to every rule and this is not intended to be a blanket indictment, but the alleys in the downtown commercial .area are littered beyond belief. In some cases the dumpsters are filled beyond capacity, in others the dumpsters are virtually ignored and the trash is simply piled around the surrounding area. Health and fire hazards abound and City ordinances are clearly being ignored. The downtown area needs more containers, of a more attractive and functional design, and more frequent collection of refuse. Downtown Residential .- The downtown residential area falls into the same category as the downtown commercial . area. Alleys are virtually full of litter; receptacles, if used at all, are inadequate and uncovered. A particular problem exists in those residential areas east of Main Street which do not have garages . Fire and health hazards are in abundance. Such alleyways are ideal for recent innovations in mechanized collection systems. Street sweeping in the downtown residential area is hampered by the abundance of parked cars which can only be remedied by posting no parking signs during designated sweeping hours . Construction Sites : With few exceptions, every construction site surveyed was badly littered with not only discarded construction materials, but by cans, paper and glass products. Dumpsters were not in evidence and one apartment project on the east side of town being constructed within an existing residential unit, clearly was responsible for heavy littering in the adjacent area. Pedestrians - This category exists in several areas , primarily near schools. Both sides of Warner Avenue adjacent to the high school are heavily littered, as is the Main Street high school area, with part of that overflow trapped in the planting areas which front the Civic Center complex. Motorists - While the streets within the newer residential areas of the city are reasonably litter free, the main arterial streets have a problem with the litter, again, being trapped in adjacent fences , plantings or vacant lots. A few general observations: 1) Beach areas themselves were reasonably clean, partially due to the lack of activity at this time of the year. 2) The apparently aborted glass recycling center at the Marina View High School on the north side of Warner Avenue is an eyesore. 3) At the time of our survey Central Park was relatively litter free on the surface although there are large amounts of litter trapped in the adjacent shrubbery. 4) In the first five blocks of Main Street there are adequate litter containers but apparently these are not attractive to pedestrians and motorists who prefer to leave their cans and bottles stacked on the sidewalk. What is Pitch In - - How Does The For Positive Program Work Litter Reduction? The Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction program is completely explained in a 28-page manual with Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction is a litter-control supplemental material including model litter program designed for use by your municipality or ordinances and curriculum guides for elementary county government—to reduce litter on a and secondary schools.This material sets forth the sustaining basis. Your work of the Interdepartmental Committee, The program is the result of four years of including uding seven major activities: in 12 cities throughout the United States.Its proven, Interdepartmental 7. Analyzing the Litter Problem allows the Commit- litter-reduction techniques,properly used,can Committee A tee to discover where the litter is and what causes it. save your municipality or county thousands of 6 Siren thening Ordinances and Enforcement dollars annually in sanitation costs and reduce 'litter b as much as 70 percent. provides the muscle to implement the program. Y P Your Committee must be individually structured to 3. Combating the Problem in the Business Sector, Those tested techniques range over the meet the needs of your specific area. But in general, which is responsible for four of the seven primary program's four main components or actions—up- working with your Mayor or County Supervisor, sources of litter. dating local ordinances,improving refuse hand- the Committee will be composed of designated 4. Combating the Problem in the Private Sector, ling,activating stronger law enforcement,broaden- officials from the following departments: which is involved with three of the sources. ing public understanding. • The Public Works/Sanitation Department is the 5 9 Workin with Communications Media to key department.The representative of this department establish total public awareness of the local litter is the natural person to coordinate committee activities. problem and how it can be controlled. Seven Sources • The Building and Zoning Department can require 6. Directing a specific program to students in local approval of refuse collection procedures,stor- elementary and secondary schools in order to Those actions,in turn,are directed against the age and disposal in the plans for all new commercial develop positive attitudes and practices. one and multiple-housing structures,and at the same seven sources of litter.At one time,everyone time,enforce litter control at construction sites. 7. Monitoring the results to keep the community thought litter originated with only pedestrians and • The City/County Attorney's Office can strengthen aware of the progress of the program and to find motorists.The research,however,made clear that local ordinances,authorize enforcement powers or the persistent problems that may need additional litter also comes from five other sources—household local governmental personnel and streamline emphasis. enforcement procedures. refuse putouts,commercial refuse putouts, loading • The Fire Department can enforce proper disposal ; and unloading operations,uncovered trucks and of refuse,since improper disposal causes fire hazards. I-___________. construction projects. • The Health Department can also enforce proper i To solve your litter problems,your city or county disposal of refuse,since improper disposal can ; cause health hazards. must attack all seven sources.And the best way to • The Housing Department can enforce litter start is to organize a single group drawn from ordinances in local government-operated housing departments of local government.This Interdepart- projects and can pinpoint litter problems when • inspecting for violations of the local housing code. mental Committee is fundamental to the success • The Parking Authority can reduce litter in of Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction.And so is the government-owned parking lots and thus encourage - cooperation of all residents of your city or county. a cleaner environment throughout your city or county. a • The Parks and Recreational Department can assist in the enforcement of litter ordinances and in �o Sponsors the collection of refuse. a • The Police Department is responsible for effective enforcement of litter laws.It can also assist the The Program 3 i / sanitation department in routing and scheduling refuse collections during normal periods of low traffic. Sponsored by the United States Brewers Associa- Other members of your Committee might include tion,the program is offered without charge to your a government or volunteer public relations person, city or county.Association personnel,fully trained, or representatives from the public school system, are available to serve as volunteer consultants to the Chamber of Commerce or community groups. your Interdepartmental Committee or group. 1 1 What Are The Benefits? 1 Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction can benefit 1 your city or county in many valuable ways. YourCity 1 Consider,for example,these five areas: 0 1 Economic and County Q. The line can be held against rising sanitation costs N by reducing the demand for cleaning public �e Invited To property,thus permitting improved household • O 1 and commercial refuse collection. Z rV 1 Fire Prevention w Fire hazards are reduced because flammable ZZ 1 litter is not allowed to accumulate. 0 _ w 1 Health rp1mtch 1 Health Hazards are reduced by eliminating refuse 0 1 putouts that provide homes for rodents and insects. a o 0 Q Physical Improvement V � o � 1 O 6 Increased pride in the attractiveness of your city or O c: E 1 county leads private citizens to improve their own s y 0 O 1 property—on a continuing basis. c Q a 1 Success Psychology H 1 By solving one local problem—litter—a positive c O 1 climate is established that leads to solutions of ■riri■ lil t other civic problems. L16U c a E 1 Where Can Additional C: 1 Information for Positive W a) N 1 Be Obtained? ~ C N 1 Additional information about Pitch In for Positive Q E N Litter Reduction can be obtained by completing fitter 1 the attached form and returning it to the United States Brewers Association at the address Q ■� 1 indicated below.A USBA representative will then W 1 contact you as soon as possible. Reduction O ~ 1 CZ fi) 1 N 1 A ffiddMarl UNITED STATES = w 1 BREWERS ASSOCIATION < o � F.. Z Q �� 1 1 1 � 1 80 f 1 r United States Brewers Association, Inc. Southern CaNfornia and Southern Nevada 1$e3 17142 ST. ANDREWS LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 (714) 846-7479 ERWIN P. NEWTON Realonel Rermmadve FACT SHEET PITCH IN FOR POSITIVE LITTER REDUCTION WHAT: Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction is a new, streamlined, completely-researched litter "control pro- gram of the United States Brewers Association (USBA) . It is designed for use by municipal and county govern- meet departments--to reduce litter on a sustaining basis. WHY: Because. the most immediate and continuing , litter- reduction results , according to research,come from municipal or county governments,' whose departments are responsible for litter-removal• procedures , improved refuse handling, updated ordinances , law enforcement , and education. WHERE: The program will be offered initially to a minimum of 150 municipalities and counties by USBA's 50 field staff members . WHEN: Fall , 1977. And continuing in an increased number of cities and counties during 1978. r. -more- ...-... - _ ...- - ..... .. +-.w-. vv.�._ ..L .-w..: .f1Y-::Uf'li!-Yb :t.%:'.-...A:,. C'•'' 4: l.,.n... ... - . - .. .. - A —2— 6. WHO: In each municipality or county, the. program will be. headed by an Inter-Departmental Committee whose members are selected from: 1. Sanitation (Or Public Works) 2. Parks/Recreation 6 . Fire .3. Police, 7. Health 4. Attorney's Office 8.. Housing 5 . . Building & Zoning 9 . Parking Authority In addition, the Committee will have representation from the Office of the Mayor or County Supervisor-- and will be assisted by a member of the USBA Field Staff. HOW: Starting with a litter analysis and providing for precise measurement of 'results , the Positive Litter Reduction system emphasizes : 1. Strong ordinances and law enforcement 2 . Efficient use of manpower and modern equipment 3. Proper containerization of litter 4. Responsibilities of business and industry 5 . The Pitch In! symbol--to communicate and unify the program message : containerization With those components , the system focuses on the seven sources of litter: 1 . Household Refuse Putouts 4 . Uncovered Trucks 2. Commercial Refuse Putouts 5 . Construction Sites 6 . Pedestrians 3 . Loading/Unloading Operations 7 . Motorists s . _ . -3- BACKGROUND: Pitch In for Positive Litter Reduction basically combines the most effective results from two tested and proven USBA programs; 1 . The Action Research Model , which achieved and sustained. litter reductions. up to 70 percent in the research sites of Tampa, Fla., Sioux Falls , Si Dakota, Dade County, Fla. , And Washington; D. C. 2. Pitch Inl , a national educational program implemented by industry, government and citi- zens working together to reduce litter. -30- ,y .E• t f IT '�i �y4 Y ..L 4 '4 } {N`�� .. �; 5 9e� t .. � �� �g" 1'+�k �. f J �t� t Al ca ts„ r 2 fl � 0 Lo n� - 7 P���jdi6 W� s e eet [hated States R+evRi5 .Mean, bw 1750 K Stet N W WashuVtan, ®C a+ r ` R v United States Brewers Association., Inc. 1750 K STREET. N. W WASIIINCTON. D. C 20000 For many years, the United States Brewers Association has conducted various programs dedicated to litter control and reduction. Through this leadership position, we have helped to create imaginative and effective community litter-prevention activities In 1972, PITCH IN! was introduced nationally. This added several new dimensions to already-existing programs - most notably, a national advertising campaign using major media to carry the message that litter can be controlled and reduced. Because an even greater continuing effort was needed, the Action Research Model was launched in 1973. This project dealt with new systems and revolved around changing community attitudes. It was tested successfully and extended to numerous sites. PITCH IN! for Positive Litter Reduction is a completely-tested program which utilizes the successes developed over the past five years The nationally-known PITCH IN! symbol serves as the identification point. 1 Rather than depend on a volunteer Citizens.Committee, the ' program calls for an -Interdepartmental Committee made up of involved department heads. Through this Committee, a systems'-approach is utilized to stimulate litter control, improved refuse handling, .active law enforcement and other upgraded techniques. By using this method, litter can be reduced immediately and the reductions sustained. This will be a priority field services program . All USBA field services staff will devote a great deal of their time toward widespread implementation. It will bring renewed encouragement, enthusiasm and success to.the ever-growing number of government officials and citizens who are determined to correct the litter problem in their communities. This manual sets forth the, simple steps, that have been developed for achieving and sustaining high-level litter reduction in municipalities and counties. Written by National Consultant Christopher C. .Gilson in cooperation with our staff, it is.based on new research, ideas and concepts that have come from field experiences with systematic litter control. envy King George R. Minshew President Vice President - Field Services r-,2V THE NEW FOCUS It now is widely recognized that litter domes from these seven sources: Pedestrians. Motorists. Household refuse putouts. Commercial refuse putouts. Loading and unloading.operations.. Uncovered and Inadequately-covered trucks. Construction projects. This ,recognition makes It increasingly.clear there-can be valuable beneflts' for municipalities and counties frorn,deal ..1nideffectively with the causes of litter. 7hese benefits fall into five categories.: . I . . Economic. The line can be held against rising costs through: a. Reducing the need for cleaning streets, roads, catch basins, parking lots, parks., beaches, other recreation areas and vacant lots. b. Facilitating household and commercial refuse collection • and hauling. 2. Fire Prevention. Lower incidence of accumulations of flammable litter will cut the fire hazards they create. 3. Health Safeguards. Since improper refuse putputs provide attractions to and harborages for rodents and Insects, resultant health hazards can be reduced. 4. Physical Improvement. Increased pride that comes with clean surroundings leads to other steps by citizens to make their own properties and entire communities more attractive. 5. Success Psychology. By solving one local problem, a positive climate can be established for using the same basic approach to overcome others. .( - . Thus municipal and county governments have much to gain from taking advantage of new methods.to achieve and sustain large-scale litter reduction. Such methods, designed to get direct, fast results through simple steps, have been produced by the following chain of events: In 1973, national beverage and packaging industries launched the Action Research Model (ARM) project to develop a sound approach to the litter`problem. Out of it, with -the seven sources as the base, came a system .for interlocking four 'Components: ordinances, :technology, education, enforcement. In. 1974, under direction of the United States Brewers Association, one of ARM"s sponsors, the system was field tested. in.three pilot cities - Char•totte, North Carolina, Macon, Georgia, and Tampa, Florida. On the strength of successes there, a program of extending it to other sites was begun. Among the significant things to surface was that efficient sanitation is the heart of effective litter control. The nature of the sources and of the four components made this inevitable. The testing in Tampa, through the Department of Sanitation, substantiated that adoption of new techniques embodied in the system greatly can reduce litter and sustain that reduction. In 1975, further testing was undertaken to gauge the system Is y capability under formidable circumstances. This was in Dade County, Florida (the Miami area), with 2054 square miles, 27 -separate municipalities, a yearround population of 1 ,500,000 and 13,000,000 annual°visitors. A two-year report issued June 21 , 1977 provides convincing evidence the test is being met. Early in 1976, an underlying need became more and more apparent. This was to -make the system easier for all sizes of localities to use it. Consequently., another phase was launched. Its objective, through analyzing experiences in the various areas and applying new lines of thinking to them, was to refine, hone and streamline the system. In doing so, a recurring consideration was that successful litter control depends on proper containerization of all solid waste. From the time it was introduced in 19721, PITCH IN I has received wide acceptance as.a symbol for this. It was obvious, then, there would be advantages to building PITCH IN into the system The steps set forth in this manual comprise the simplified approach that has resulted. from the above sequence of developments. THE MECHANISM Among the things to become clear is-that achieving a high level of sanitation efficiency, and reducing litter in the process, calls for participation by local departments beyond the one directly responsible for this essential public service. To consider in any locality how coordinated efforts by official agencies best can be brought about is to conclude that an Interdepartmental Committee is the logical instrument. It is recommended, therefore, that in'each munici pat ityand'county such a Committee be appointed'by the chief administrative officer or governing body. There are several paints-that emphasize the desirability of doing this at. county as well as municipal levels. They Include- 1 . The fact litter is a problem in unincorporated areas of counties along with incorporated' areas of cities. 2. A prevalent situation today-wherein many citizens work in cities, but live in counties. Or vice versa. So it's important to reach them from both directions. 3. The advantages of having, to the greatest extent possible, uniform litter-control ordinances equally applicable in adjacent areas. 4. The opportunities that are opened for municipal and county departments to work in partnership toward a common objective. 5. The fact many of the communications media are regional in character and can make a greater impact if the messages they carry are directed to their total audiences. The make-up of the Committee in each instance necessarily must be governed by the local departmental structure The following list, offered for guideline purposes, suggests the agencies which should be represented by a top official from.each. Building and Zoning. There are two roles this agency can play: . 1 . Requiring approval by the department in charge of refuse collection on provision for.and location of refuse-disposal and storage facilities in plans for new commercial buildings and multiple-housing structures. 2. Enforcing ordinance provisions relating to containerization and cleanup of debris at construction projects. :did'>om !► � G1L lij7�. �'L'S i3:.;. ..WS..Js.' fr]•5. T1 e 4. City/County Attorney's .Office. Three important needs can be handled by this office following agreement from other departments and leading to approval by the local governing body: 1 . Strengthening ordinances to cover the seven sources of Titter and to assure adequate cleanliness-of-premises provisions. 2. Authorizing particular departmental personnel to perform specific enforcement functions. 3. Streamlining enforcement procedures.. Fire Department. Since violations of refuse containerization/storage" regulations and cleanliness--of-premises provisions can constitute or create fire hazards, increased attention by inspectors to these violations can serve the two-fold purpose of fire prevention and litter reduction. Health Department. The same rationale applies to health inspectors with regard to similar violations that are or can become health hazards. Housing. Two actions by this department will make a substantial contribution: 1 . If there are projects owned. or operated by the city or county, enforcement of litter-control regulations will aid in keeping them in good condition. 2. Where personnel inspect multiple-dwelling or other housing for violations of the Housing Code, including refuse containerization/storage and cleanliness-of-premises provisions will reduce residential-area litter. Parking Authority. It is being demonstrated that working "with sanitation officials to stem the creation of litter at municipally or county-owned parking lots not only will reduce cleaning needs there, but will have beneficial effects in reducing litter on streets and on other properties. Parks/Recreation. By taking two steps, litter can be reduced at parks, beaches 5 and other recreation areas, with overall sanitation efficiency furthered: I Obtaining and using authorization wherein designated on-the-scene personnel of the department(s) can enforce at these locations requirements that litter be disposed of only In proper containers. 2.- Exploring the potential of consolidating with other departments all litter-receptacle emptying and repair. Police. There are three ways in which police can play pivotal roles in the total effort: I . . Where regular patrolmen or special units .such as Meter . .Maids are assigned to enforce parking regulations in commercial areas, it's logical to extend this to include sanitation regulations relating to: a. Littering by pedestrians. b. Littering by motorists. c Littering by uncovered or inadequately-covered trucks. d. Improper commercial, refuse putouts. e. Failure to maintain clean commercial premises. 2. Where units patrol roads traveled by trucks, it's a simple matter to enforce covered-truck regulations. 3. Sy working with sanitation officials on refuse-collect ton. routing and scheduling to take advantage of normal periods of lowest traffic density, the time. required to collect and haul can be cut. 'The better schedules aremaintained, the less litter.comes from standing putouts. Public Works/Sanitation. As the one normally responsible for sanitation services and functions, this, of course, is,the key department. Accordingly., the official who represents it on the Interdepartmental Committee is the logical one to serve as chairman. Similarly, a member of the.department is the natural individual to be named Committee coordinator, with these primary duties: 1 To arrange for and handle the details of regular and special meetings.. 2. To keep records of the meetings. 3. To maintain follow-up:liaison with the departments on decisions reached and courses of action charted. 6. An additional consideration is that where the city or county has a public relations unit that serves all departments, having its director on the Committee can be a distinct advantage. This for the reason that the communications media have a large part to play in the total effort. Also, if there is a functioning citizens group working on the litter problem in the community, it's proper that the chairman serve as an ex off icio member of the Committee. For where this is the case, strength can be gained all the way around through a close working relationship. By the same token, there. are other leaders who properly might serve as ex officio members. For. example: An official from .the Public School System. The staff director of the Chamber of Commerce. A local individual acting as volunteer public relations adviser if there is no official city or, county public relations unit. With this structure, specific ways the Committee can implement coordinated plans that will achieve and sustain maximum litter reduction are covered in the sections that follow. 7• ANALYZING TH E LITTER.PROBLEM Although litter follows many similar patterns in most places, such factors as climate, population density and geography cause some conditions to vary. Consequently, the first essential'in any locality is to have a clear picture of where the litter is and of what's causing it. The departments that deal with it in one way or another have a number of facts, of course. 'But in order for all Interdepartmental Committee members to have a common'base of information, it's .suggested the area be spotchecked with the following objectives in mind: 1 . Pinpointing main types of problem.situations. 2. Appraising conditions that may call for new ordinance provisions or amendments. 3. Determining needs for technological improvements. 4. Arriving at points of emphasis for the. public. 5. Directing thinking and planning with respect to enforcement. 6. Providing a base for gauging results. The form on the next page is designed to help personnel assigned to do this checking. The source symbols are: P Pedestrians M Motorists HRP Household Refuse Putouts CRP Commercial Refuse.Putouts T Uncovered or Inadequately-Covered Trucks L/U Loading/Unloading Operations CP Construction. Projects As will be noted, the form includes a simple system for rating sites in terms of their cleanliness. G Good (not littered or lightly littered) F Fair (medium amounts of litter) P Poor (abundant litter) The form can be adapted to fit the needs of different localities. It's recommended that a separate sheet be used for each site within the various categories. Litter Survey.Form. Location of Site: (boundaries, other information) Category . Rating Obvious or Apparent Sources G F P P M . HRP CRP T L/U CP Retail/Commercial 'Sidewalks Streets Alleys Parking Lots Warehouse/Industrial Sidewalks Streets Alleys Parking Lots Vacant Lots Residential Sidewalks Streets Yards Alleys Bus Stops Vacant Lots Schools Entrances Parking Lots .Play Areas Nearby Stores Parks Sidewalks Bench Areas Play Areas Beaches Parking Lots Picnic Areas Swimming Areas �' Rural Roadsides a STRENGTHENING ORDINANCES AND ENFORCEMENT. Provisions Experiences with local programs have brought out that certain types - of ordinance provisions will facilitate successful litter.control. Listed here; they're recommended for Committee consideration: 1 . Specifying It is unlawful to litter private premises as well . as public properties. 2. Making distributors of handbills, leaflets, flyers, etc. responsible for any litter they create. 3. Expediting proper disposal by pedestrians.."through` requiring establishments catering to and/or.used by_the public to provide and regularly empty adequate, suitable- public litter receptacles. This applies to .exterior areas at such as the following: Shopping centers., convenience stores, .comme rc ial parking lots, sery ice's tat ions; fast-food outlets; institutions, motels. 4. Making owners, or. drivers, responsible for discards from cars, regardless of which occupant may have committed the violation. 5. Basing household refuse-container capacity requirements on average per capita daily volume in the community and specifying that: a. Containers are to be kept covered. " b. Loose excess materials are to be packaged or tied .securely. c. Spillage is to be cleaned up if and as it occurs. 6. Requiring commercial establishments to have sufficient container capacity to handle volume of output between collections and to: a. Keep containers covered. b. Securely package or tie loose excess materials. c. Clean up spillage if and as it occurs. 7. If the Building and Zoning Department doesn't already have the authority to do so, requiring that plans for new. commercial and multiple-housing construction be cleared with Public Works/ Sanitation as to provision for refuse disposal and storage facilities. 19. For trucks carrying loose ;materials, making the act of not . -.... z. .•�.x` -4.. "'.:4- �.b.%1i24![G'tiu'�9.'IbITJaL`W'fa::1i:R{9' ..... a . x ..i .. .. ... 1 -if having adequate covering a violation in and of itself, thus elimihating the necessity of officers having to observe items blowing or spilling from them. 9. .Requiring of establishments with loading/unloading operations: a. That they provide, and to the extent possible use, on- the-spot containers for disposal of residue. b.. That there be end-of-working-day cleanup of any materials not containerized. 10. Requiring of builders at construction projects: a. That they provide and use containers for normal residue and employee lunchtime-coffee-break discards. b. That there be end-of-working-day cleanup of any such . materials not containerized. 11 . Stipulating that residential and commercial premises are to be maintained in clean condition at all times and that: a. Owners are responsible for the cleanliness of.sidewalks and of grass.and dirt strips between curbs and sidewalks on which their properties face. b. Sidewalk sweepings are to be picked up and put in proper containers, not pushed into the streets. Authorizations As indicated earlier., there are certain types of violations that can be handled by personnel of the various departments. It's important that there be clear authorizations for .them and that specific personnel so authorized be designated This applies to: Building and Zoning. 1 . Clearance of plans for new construction with Public Works/ Sanitation. 2. Failure.to containerize and clean up debris at construction projects. Fire Department. Refuse putouts and littered premises that constitute or may create fire hazards Health Department. Refuse putouts and littered premises that are or can become health hazards. ti 41 ;. . Housing. 1 . Litter-control violations at city-owned or county-owned projects. • 2. Improper refuse putouts and littered premises at multiple-dwelling or other units inspected for Housing Code violations.' Parks/Recreation. Littering at parks, beaches and other recreation areas. Police. 1 . Where .regular patrolmen or special units such as Meter. Maids are assigned to enforce parking regulations in commercial areas, extension of authority to include litter-control violations previously noted (Page 5). 2. In all areas, uncovered or inadequately-covered trucks. . Public Works/Sanitation. All violations. Suggested are the following alternatives or a combination.thereof with respect to personnel: 1 . Authorizing supervisors down through the level of field superintendents" or foremen. 2. Creating a special.unit of uniformed inspectors whose sole duty is enforcement. Procedures Widely prevailing are four roadblocks hampering litter-law enforcement: 1 . Complicated methods of getting violators to court, often involving warnings, grace periods, notices and time allowances. 2. Cumbersome,citations that are difficult and time-consuming to write. 3 . Enforcement personnel having to spend long periods in court defending their actions. 4. Offenders getting off with minimal fines or no fines at all. The obvious way to overcome these where they exist is to streamline the method. Suggested for Committee consideration, in consultation with the Judiciary, are the following possibilities:. 1 Y �k 1.2 Simple, direct citations to court. A mail-in ticket system that: 1 . Uses a form, similar to a parking ticket, which lists violations, together with set fines For them . The issuer checks the one for which the ticket is written. 2. Offers the violator the option of mailing in the ticket with the fine or appearing in court to argue the case. 3. For stationary violations, gives enforcement personnel -; the authority to issue a new ticket calling for an identical fine, or a graduated one, each day the same violation is observed. Fines •The general feeling today is that fines should be based on relative seriousness of offenses. Since situations vary by localities, no precise formula, universally applicable, has been worked out. A table has been devised, however, to serve as a guide. This suggests grouping violations into three scales, with the highest fines in the first and the lowest in the third. Scale 1 : Dumpouts. Improper putouts of bulk and junk. Litter-spreading construction projects. Littered vacant lots Materials spilling and flying from trucks. Scale 2: Materials spreading from loading/unloading operations_ . Improper household and commercial refuse putouts. Sweepouts. Littered sidewalks and strips. Littered residential and commercial premises: Distributing handbills, flyers, etc: Scale 3: Discards by pedestrians. Discards by motorists. As to dollar amounts, there similarly is no set formula. The main idea is to make them high enough to serve as deterrents, but not so high that they're unrealistic. may, a THE BUSINESS SECTOR Source Responsibility To consider the seven sources of litter is to note that four of them are directly associated with commercial enterprises of one kind or another:. Virtually all establishments produce refuse that's put out for collection. Large numbers have loading and unloading operations. Loose materials are hauled either by companies that operate their own trucks or. by trucking companies-. Individual entrepreneurs or contracting companies construct new buildings and other types of.projects And in some instances they share responsibility for a fifth. By not providing litter.receptacles _for.cu§tomers and others who use their properties, they contribute to improper discards by pedestrians. In other words, the.business sector holds the key to a significant part of stemming the flow of litter from its sources, Premises By the same token, substantial amounts of the litter that's in constant ti evidence are on business properties•. This condition can be attributed to: Infrequent or irregular cleaning. Cleaning only smooth surfaces and ignoring others. Permitting trapped litter to accumulate at fence and wall bases., in grassy and planted areas, along embankments, at parking-lot borders and at other locations at which it becomes lodged. So commercial enterprises. also hold the answer to dealing with a good part of the litter already around. The Impact Factor The Public Works/Sanitation Department alone is usually limited in the influence it can exert to correct conditions that prevail at business establishments. Where citizens groups are. working to reduce.litter, they've demonstrated in a number of cases the. capability of bringing about a higher degree of voluntary cooperation from owners and managers. But again, there are limitations. rW4 ,sfi 14: The Interdepartmental Committee, on the other hand, has considerable strength it can bring to bear. This is inherent in the following combination: . 1 . The fact the municipal or county government has created the Committee with the speciftc charge of reducing litter to a minimum through utilizing all the resources available to it. 2. The fact one of these resources is a multi-department enforcement component. As has been proved many times in litter-control efforts, the mere existence of such a component is a force in and of itself. Knowledge it's.there, ready for use If needed, brings a marked increase in voluntary compliance. A Route To Travel It has been found in surprising numbers of cases that-owners and managers are unaware of particular situations at their establishments. For example: 1 . That their own refuse putouts and loading/unloading operations are creating the greatest percentage of litter on their own prem ises. 2. That they're contributing to unkempt community appearance • by not doing something about the trapped litter they've allowed to accumulate. 3. That they're breaking the law by pushing sidewalk sweepings into the street instead of picking them up and putting them in proper containers. Accordingly, it's important that they come to know such things and be. given an opportunity to take corrective action voluntarily. In cities, direct access to the majority of local enterprises can be gained through the Chamber of Commerce.. It's recommended that the Interdepartmental Committee call the chief officers of this organization to a meeting to discuss the picture, with emphasis on these points: 1 . The Committee is determined to take every action it must to overcome the litter problem in the community. 2 . Businesses are responsible for much of the litter; thus they have a major role to play. 3. Along with other factors, economic benefits are involved. 4. Establishments will be given a specified period of time in which to correct situations. Y 1 i xx''2-4 7d ..>x 5. There will be serious, continuous enforcement following this period.. Many communities are. using a checklist to inform and remind owners ' and managers about controlling litter and keeping premises clean. It can be helpful to the Chamber in getting information to its members. A sample is on the next page Since most counties don't have Chambers of Commerce or similar organizations, it's necessary there to work out a different approach. County Commissions, Councils and Managers will know the most practical means of doing:so As in cities, .the checklist can be used.as an informational• vehicle. Specific Industries It will be. noted that the checklist is designed For commercial premises. it doesn't cover two of the business-associated sources of litter: trucks and construction projects. In view of this, . it's suggested the Interdepartmental Committee have separate meetings with trucking companies and contractors to make the same points and to discuss their particular roles. Enforcement • Once it's announced enforcement will take place,after a specified period, it's highly essential this actually happen. Otherwise the whole program will lose *its credibility. With this in mind, it's important for the Interdepartmental Committee to have all plans for enforcement well in hand, including the ways it will be coordinated among the different departments This accents the need for giving initial top priority to the steps outlined in the preceding section.on strengthening ordinances and enforcement: The base should be firm and sound before moving ahead With other parts of the structure. Checklist for Commercial Establishments REFUSE PUTOUTS ( ) Provide adequate container capacity to handle volume between collections. ( ) Keep containers covered. ( ) Clean up spillage if and'as it occurs. ( ) Securely tie loose excess materials resulting from unusual circumstances. LOADING/UNLOADING OPERATIONS ( . ) Use on-the-spot containers for quick disposal of wrappings and other materials. ( ) Maintain end-of-day cleanup of litter that has not been containerized. L ITT ER RECEPTACLES ( ) Provide litter containers for use of customers and employees where recurring accumulations indicate a need. DAILY CLEANUP Make provision for regular cleaning of litter deposited, blown or washed onto the premises. Loose Litter: ( ) Sidewalks. ( ) Driveways. ( ) Parking lots. ( ) Alleys. Trapped Litter: ( ) Fence and wall bases ( ) Parking-lot borders . ( ) Grass and planted areas. ( ) Embankments. ( ) Catch basins. d •. .. � f r i 'fFjz�° 3�r 4 THE PUBLIC SECTOR It has been established that business enterprises are directly involved with four of litter's seven sources.. The public in general, then, comprises the other three as: Pedestrians. Motorists. Householders (refuse putouts). The, steps set forth.here are directed at changing. the habits and practices which .produce a continuous flow of litter from them. The Symbol Among the things learned through experiences.with local programs is that persuading the public to control litter is strikingly similar to selling a product. It calls for effective merchandising. And in this a symbol that captures the essence of the product can be a powerful motivational and reminding force. Prior reference, has been made to PITCH IN! This. is such.a symbol. It exemplifies what litter control is all about proper containerization. Because this is so, it's recommended that Interdepartmental Committees adopt it as a trade mark for use on and in: 1 . All public litter receptacles. 2. Power sweepers. 3. Manual-sweeper carts. 4. Refuse-collection vehicles. 5. Parks/Recreation vehicles. 6. Other sanitation-related vehicles. 7. Print media. 8 . Public service radio and television spots. The United States Brewers Association has available and will furnish without charge to Committees PITCH IN! decals and other materials that can be used for these' purposes. Pedestrians The obvious key to reducing litter from this, source is to get people to ,. yid? hold all discards for proper containerization. This means providing 3 to the greatest degree feasible facilities for them to do so. Public Receptacles It's recognized that units of any kind, .from ordinary drums to the most. sophisticated types on the market, involve money. The initial cost is only part of the story. Once there, they have to be kept emptied. And maintenance work is required to keep them in good condition. A point to consider, however, is that an investment in more receptacles and in subsequent servicing and-maintenance can be offset by reduced costs of cleaning streets, parking lots, parks, beaches and other areas. Questions frequently are raised about how many receptacles, a community should have, There's no pat answer. -It's a case of determining where recurring output of pedestrian-created litter indicates a need. The following list of categories:of locations at or in the vicinity" of which pedestrians normally produce litter Is offered as a guide for making such determination: 1 . General Commercial"Areas. a, Stores that sell litter-related items (candy, cigarettes, ice cream, beverages, newspapers, hot dogs, hamburgers, pizza, etc.) b. Fast-food outlets. c. Theatres. d. Bowling alleys e. Bus stops. f . Sports arenas. g. Outdoor telephone booths or stands. h. Parking lots. i . Vacant lots. 2. Warehouse/Industrial Areas. a. Locations at. which traveling canteens park to dispense beverages, rolls, sandwiches, etc. b. Building fronts where employees eat lunch or have coffee breaks. c. Stores and stands that sell litter-related items. d. Parking lots. e. Vacant lots. f . Bus stops 3. Residential Areas. a. Neighborhood grocery and convenience stores. b. Bus stops. c. Playgrounds. d. Vacant lots. 19'. 4. Schools. a. Entrances. b. Parking lots. c. Play areas. d. Nearby stores. e. To-and-from routes of foot travel. f . Bus stops 5. Parks a. Sidewalks. b. Bench areas. c. 'Play areas.. 6. Beaches. a. Parking lots. b. Picnic areas. c. Canteen areas. d. Swimming areas. It should be kept in mind that one of the recommended ordinance provisions is for certain types of commercial establishments to provide receptacles for customers and others who use their properties. This requirement can set up a complementing situation wherein placement on public properties can be dovetailed with that on private premises. This well may reduce the need on the former. It also is suggested that exploration be made of the possibility of consolidating responsibility for emptying and maintenance of all publicly- owned receptacles presently assigned to different departments. In any given locality, as many as the four listed below, perhaps even others, may be emptying their own receptacles and keeping them in repair in their own shops: 1 . Public Works/Sanitation. 2. Parks. 3. Recreation (if separate from Parks). 4. Schools. The thought behind consolidation is-two-fold: That emptying be according to a .coordinated plan for all locations, with a special unit of manpower and trucks handling the entire assignment. That the same shop handle all repairs. The objective.Is to achieve these gains: 1 . Fewer. manhours and trucks needed for emptying because there would be one coordinated, continuous-path.operat ion instead of several separate ones working independently, 2. Fewer manhours for maintenance because it would be worked into other operations at one shop instead of at several. If the exploration reveals cost benefits will result from such a step, a portion of the savings might be allocated for additional receptacles if and where needed. Persuasion The evidence is that if there's adequate placement, a high percentage of pedestrians can be persuaded to make a consistent prract1ce of holding litter for receptacles. In at least one major city, for instance, the level reached nine out of.ten. In this, the communications media have a key role. A separate section of this manual covers use of media to reduce the-Flow from all three of the public sources. Motorists ' Early in 1977, a study was done on the anatomy of motorists'.litter. It brought out that the materials drivers and occupants discard from cars can be grouped as follows: 1 . Items disposed of after stopping for refreshments or shopping for supplies. These include: a. Wrappers from candy, food, ice cream ,and other immediately consumable or usable products. b. Bags and cartons that have contained the above items. c. Paper napkins. d. Beverage 'containers - coffee, soft drinks; beer, milk; juice. e. Leftovers peelings, cores, parts of hot dogs, sandwiches, hamburgers, etc. f . Lists and receipts, 2 . Similar items related to food and beverages brought along on trips for in-car consumption. 3 . Items discarded after they've served their purpose in the normal course of driving. a. Empty cigarette packages and matchbooks. b. Cigar, chewing gum and candy wrappers. c. Tissues, The study led to an obvious conclusion: it's important to get owners to put litterbags or other containers in their cars. A simple calculation illustrates this: For every 1000 vehicles in which just five items are put into car containers over a given week-end, there are 5000 fewer pieces of litter along roads and,elsewhere that Sunday night: What About Car Containers? There hasn't been extensive research on this subject. But regional surveys have produced these findings: Four out of five owners who have containers in their cars generally use them 'for their discards.. Where containers are visible in cars, the tendency is for occupants .to use them also. Only about one out of every five cars has a container in it. What these figures suggest is that littering by motorists will decline as the number of owners who carry containers in their cars increases: Hence taking steps to get them into more cars can be a productive pursuit for the Interdepartmental Committee in each locality. Logical Strategy In virtually every community, there are various organized groups. These include Civic associations. Church organizations. Farm and trade organizations. Fraternal organizations. Service clubs. Women's organizations.. A common experience in..litter--control programs. is to approach these groups and find they°re receptive. But when the discussions get down to specifics as to what they can do, a frequent occurrence is to arrive at no definitive courses of action. To ask every organized group to take on the assignment of getting all its members to place and use containers in their cars is a specific. It's a tangible project that's within the capability of each of them. And it's something that will produce visible results benefitting the entire community. It's recommended, therefore, that the Committee call the heads of all such organizations to a meeting for the single purpose of outlining and launching this project. And that mechanics be worked out for maintaining follow-up liaison. ,t , + 43t�7r,�gkF Litterbags for cars and .other uses are available from many sources. Another USBA publication, "Your Guide to Community Litter Reduction, " • has listings of these and other materials, along with manufacturers and prices. Additional Possibilities The project with organized groups will get litter containers into a large number of cars. This can be supplemented by such other steps as the following: 1 . Making sure all city/county-owned cars have them. 2. Getting companies to place them in their business cars and trucks and to urge employees to do so. in their personal cars. 3. If they don't now have such a policy, getting-local car-rental agencies and branches to.install them. Household Refuse Putouts There are two things about this source: 1 . Achieving a higher percentage of proper containerization Will reduce the major cause of residential-area litter. 2. At the same time, it will cut manhours and equipment fuel required for collection, thereby helping.to hold the line against rising costs for this service. Obtaining better public cooperation on this score revolves around effective use of communications media, per thg next section in this manual, and back-tap enforcement. There is another point, however. Experiences show a definite correlation between maintenance of on- time collection schedules and public willingness to cooperate. This is among the reasons many localities are looking into ways of improving their own performance. Under auspices of the Interdepartmental Committee, traffic engineers and sanitation technicians can be of valuable aid to each other in working toward: Greater use of balanced collection, :with frequency based on tonnages various neighborhoods produce. Scheduling of collection to. coincide with the most favorable traffic conditions. Increased use of continuous-path routing to get trucks closest to transfer stations or end disposal sites when they're loaded. F 1 .t sib " THE COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA Because cooperation from newspapers and radio and television stations is vital, having public relations talent available to the Interdepartmental Committee can be a valuable plus. With this in mind, it was suggested earlier that if the city or county has an official communications unit to serve the various departments, its director should be included on the Committee . If not, it's worthwhile to look into the possibility of getting volunteer help from a local advertising or public relations agency or from a public-oriented company. If neither of these alternatives. is available, it's essential that the Committee itself establish and maintain a close working rapport with the media in order that their own writers will be assigned to cover the work. Newspapers It's advantageous to adopt a two-stage concept with regard to news and feature coverage: 1 . Laying a foundation. 2. Staying in the public eye. The Foundation The purpose here is to. establish-public awareness of various facts about the local litter problem . These can fall into place as follows: 1 . The categories of locations at which the city or county Is having to do continuous .cleanup. 2. The volume of litter being removed regularly from these locations. 3. The costs of removing it. 4. The fire and health aspects. 5. The causes (seven sources). 6. The practices that-need to be changed to overcome the problem. 7. The economic and other benefits of overcoming it. 8. What the Interdepartmental Committee is setting out to do. 24 Y , Staying Public There are four categories of subjects that will serve this purpose: 1 . Actions by the Committee. Action by those the Committee calls on for participation. 3. Results as they occur. 4. Follow-up steps by the Committee to sustain and extend the results on a constant basis. The goal of this two-stage approach is to build, then maintain, a responsive public climate for litter reduction. This wilt aid the broadcast media, concurrent with the second stage, to perform specific functions with respect to each of the three public sources. Radio This medium has demonstrated over and over the reminder impact it can make. This emphasizes the logic of tailoring. public service spots to tie in with the wide visual exposure the PITCH IN! symbol will have through uses previously listed. The following 30-second spots are offered as examples: Pedestrians Do you realize you're wasting your own money every time you throw a piece of litter on the street? Because. tax dollars - your dollars - have to be used to clean it up. Think about that the next time you have something to discard. A wrapper. A tissue. Anything. Hold it for a container. . Pitch irr . to save your own money. Motorists Here's something for every car owner to think about. While we're economizing on gasoline, why not economize on litter at the same time? Everything we toss out of our car windows costs tax dollars to clean up. Let's pitch in to save our own money. Be sure to have a litterbag in your car. And use it. Leave clean roadsides . Household Refuse Putouts Who isn't concerned about rising costs? Here are simple ways you can pitch in to help the (city/.county) hold down refuse- collection costs. Have enough containers and load them carefully. Don't pack them so hard they're difficult to empty. Keep them covered. Tie loose excess materials. These steps will speed collection. And save money. jX Television These 30-second scripts also are offered as examples. If making filmed spots - by a local station, for example - isn't feasible, inexpensive slides can be used. Pedestrians VIDEO AUDIO Hand dropping a wrapper on Every time you do this, it the street. :costs you money. A littered area. Because it adds to the- litter pile Dollar sign superimposed on Tax dollars.- your dollars - the littered area being have to be used to clean cleaned. litter. Hand dropping a wrapper in Hold it for a container. a receptacle. Pitch in to save your own money. PITCH IN! symbol. w Motorists VIDEO - AUDIO Car at gasoline pump. We're economizing on gasoline these days . Hand tossing litter out of Why not litter, too? car window. Littered roadside being Everything tossed out of car cleaned. windows costs tax dollars to clean up. Close shot of litterbag. Let's pitch in to: save our . own money. Have a litterbag in your car. Clean roadside. And use it. PITCH IN! symbol. 26 Household Refuse Putouts }' VIDEO AUDIO Refuse-collection truck Cutting the time it takes • entering a block. to collect refuse will reduce costs Overloaded containers On the. average, it takes spreading litter. seconds to collect this kind of refuse. Neat containers with no It takes seconds less spillage. to collect this. Truck.leaving the block. Time means money. Pitch in to help the (city/county) save it. PITCH IN I symbol. x .x �,ye�'�' �,.esrvvr:.;+egvw- a.....mu+nwwa..is.q�uww_.».. ..Pe-••' — - - - 27. THE SCHOOLS Over and above the direct work that has been outlined so far in this manual, it's important to develop positive attitudes and .practices among children in the schools. Entirely new concepts and approaches have emerged for involving school children in improving community hygiene through controlling litter. The underlying objective is to motivate in young people understanding of and respect for sanitation as an essential public service, which understanding and respect will be reflected in efforts on..their part to aid its efficient performance. This will reduce litter. Available to Interdepartmental Committees in the fall of ,1977 for discussion with their local.school 'officials will be an imaginative school curriculum plan. from the. Public School System in Washington; . b.C. This features a combination of instruction, observation and participation to shape successive steps in the learning process. Children will be exposed to all elements of the litter problem, the importance of overcoming it, and what's necessary to-do so: For Instance: What litter is. Where it is. s What causes it. Its detrimental effects. Why people create it. The benefits of controlling it. . How it can be controlled. The key is that, with teacher guidance, children will determine: The litter problems they're creating. How they're causing them. Why they're doing so Why it would be better not to have them . What they can do to stop them . Significantly, the potential value of this kind of work in the schools can extend beyond the children themselves. There are good chances they, in turn, will exert favorable influence on their parents in following proper sanitation practices. The United States Brewers Association State Directors will have Information on when and how the Washington, D.C. materials may be obtained. 28. MONITORING RESULTS There are two primary reasons for regularly appraising results in terms of actual litter reduction: 1 . By keeping citizens informed of what's being accomplished, success momentum can be built for the effort. 2. By pinpointing where and what types of problem situations persist, added emphasis can be placed where it is needed the most. The same form that's been r9commended for analyzing conditions at the outset of the program can be used for this purpose. It's suggested that in conducting the initial survey, baseline locations be established for making periodic follow-up checks. In addition to this checking, it's advantageous, where it can be done at minimum expense, to maintain a record of the volume or tonnage of litter being removed from: Streets. Municipal or county-owned parking lots. Roads. Vacant lots. Parks. Beaches. Other recreation areas Other properties for which the municipality or county has cleaning. responsibility. This record will provide a continuing barometer of the extent to which the flow of litter is.being stemmed from the sources. Interdepartmental Committees may wish to consider also the possibility of enlisting cooperation from certain types of private establishments in keeping tab on the degree to.which reduced cleaning is being made possible by a declining volume of litter. SUPERVISOR _ /I-3 SECOND DISTRICT - ----+ WILLIS H. WARNER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORANGE COUNTY COUNTY COURT HOUSE i ROOM 208 HOME: MAIL: P. O. BOX 838 403 TENTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIF. HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIF. KI 7.3311. EXT. 326 LEX. 8.281E x a� C/ COMPLIMENTARY COPY H . STEP P : LA F., REFJS D S OS L 'i 4 i til Q H WAY DEPARTMENT C T 0 OBER 1959 75 pan COPY .X i'. i P R E F A C E This Report was submitted to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange on October 20, 1959. By Board Order, it was subsequently given in public presentation and accepted as policy on November 4, 1959. Minute Orders pertaining to these actions are as follows: October 20, 1959 IN RE: REPORT MASTER PLAN OF REFUSE DISPOSAL On motion of Supervisor Nelson, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, the report dated October 8, 1959, from the County Surveyor and Road Commissioner .on the Master Plan of Refuse Disposal was accepted. The Board of Supervisors goes on record as • commending A. S. Koch, County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, and Murray I. Storm, Disposal Engineer, for a job well done in the preparation of said report. The matter was set for public explanation on November 4, 1959, at 10:00 A.M. November 4, 1959 IN RE: HEARING PROPOSED MASTER PLAN OF REFUSE DISPOSAL On motion of Supervisor Nelson, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the hearing on the proposed Master Plan of Refuse Disposal as submitted by A. S. Koch, County Surveyor and Road Commissioner was closed, the plan approved and ordered referred to the County Counsel to prepare the necessary Ordinance for presentation to the Board of Supervisors for approval. f v ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN OF REFUSE DISPOSAL A PROPOSAL Submitted to the Orange County Board of Supervisors By Orange County Highway Department A. S. KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner ;Research & Preparation Murray I. Storm Disposal Engineer TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1 II. THE PRESENT.SITUATION 2 Disposal Policy 2 Collection Practice 3 III. PROSPECTS FOR THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE 5 The Critical Sites - Description 5 The Critical Sites - Life Expectancy 6 IV. ORANGE COUNTY'-S ULTIMATE NEEDS 8 Estimated Ultimate Population 8 Definition of Terms 9 Estimated Ultimate Refuse Production .10 V. METHODS OF DISPOSAL 11 Incineration 11 Composting 16 Ocean Disposal 20 Grinding Refuse to Sewers 23 Hog Feeding 27 Sanitary Landfill 28 In Summary 34 , VI. ECONOMICS OF TRANSFER 37 Justifying Adoption of a Transfer Plan 37 Determining the Extent of the Transfer System 40 In Summary. 42 VII. THE MASTER PLAN - REVIEW OF UNIT COSTS 43 Disposal Stations - Operating Costs 44 Disposal Stations - Amortization, Maintenance and Other Costs 47 Transfer Stations - Station Operation and Amortization Costs 48 Transfer Stations - Transportation Costs 49 In Summary 51 VIII. THE MASTER PLAN - TOTAL CAPITAL I NV ESTMENT 51 Disposal Stations 51 Transfer Stations 52 IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 v LIST OF EXHIBITS A Disposal Station Service Areas - January 1959 facing page 3 B Estimated Life Expectancy of Five Critical Disposal Sites 5 C Disposal Station Service Areas - January 1960 6 D Disposal Station Service Areas - February 1960 7 E Disposal Station Service Areas - August 1960 7 F Disposal Station Service Areas - June 1961 8 G Approximate Location of Land Fill Sites "Situation 2000" 30. H Sample of a Two-Site Transfer System in the Long-Haul Zone 40 I Sample of a Six-Si.te Transfer System in the Long-Haul Zone 42 J The Master Plan of Refuse Disposal and Transfer Station Sites Indicating Approximate Service Areas to Meet the Ultimate Needs of "Situation 2000" 43 LIST OF TABLES Comparative Summary of Various Disposal Methods page 35 Comparative Transfer Costs - "Situation 2000" 40 a Ultimate Labor and Equipment Complement - Five Disposal Stations 46 r ORANGE COUNTY MASTER PLAN OF REFUSE DISPOSAL I. PURPOSE OF THE REPORT As long as the. healthy growth of Orange County continues, there will be an increasing demand for adequate refuse disposal facilities. And as long as this growth results in the rapid ex- haustion of existing facilities years ahead of anticipated life ex- pectancy, the County will be faced with the challenge of staying C.. one jump ahead of the problem. The task of finding new sites to replace rapidly exhausting old ones has confronted the County since 1953, when conversion of disposal operations to the land- fill or cut and cover method began. But the present practice of acquiring sites on a "buy-4s-you-need" basis has been successful in providing only a temporary solution to the overall refuse disposal problem. Furthermore, the type of disposal facility which provided the short term temporary solution and tided the County over from year to year has now grown scarce. The abandoned sand or gravel pit that requires twenty years to excavate is filled with trash in less than three years. It is therefore obvious that the County can no longer depend on the availability of this type of facility and must be pre- pared to make a long range investment. Long range investments can be most wisely made only after the preparation, study and adop- tion of long range plans. This report will attempt to formulate " such a long range plan--- a "Master Plan of Refuse Disposal. " r -1= In order to do this, the ultimate need of the County must be deter- mined and the alternatives which may possibly provide for this need must be compared. The final choice of an alternative, based on feasability as well as economy, will be the "Master Plan. " Once the Master. Plan has been adopted, then and only then will it be possible to attack the County's immediate problem with a course of action headed in the proper direction. II. THE PRESENT SITUATION It is most important that the County's existing disposal system be fully understood in order to determine which of its phases may best serve as a foundation for future plans. Disposal Policy The County first entered the disposal picture in 1946 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 501 in an attempt to prevent indiscrirrii- • nate dumping in public rights of way. This ordinance vested within the County the authority to establish and maintain disposal sites for use by all residents of the County in incorporated as well as unincor- porated areas. In subsequent years, additional ordinances were adopted until the general policy now prevailing may be summarized as follows: 1. Material deposited is limited to household and commercial trash. Garbage, liquid wastes and industrial wastes are not acceptable. 2. No charge is made for dumping. 3. Trash originating outside the County is not acceptable. 4. With few exceptions, sites are open seven days T per week. 5. Salvage operations are prohibited. 1 -2- j The growth of the County from a population of less than I 200, 000 in 1946 to a present population of slightly under 700, 000 in 1,959 has been matched by a corresponding improvement in methods j of operation. Only one of the eight regular trash disposal stations employs the burning method and this in a remote, sparsely inhabited area. The other seven sites, by the application of modern cut and cover methods, meet the high standards of a sanitary landfill. The locations and service areas of the existing disposal facilities may be seen on the attached map, Exhibit A. The disposal of approximately 1, 000 tons of trash per day is presently being administered by the County's Disposal Division under the direction of the Road Commissioner. The Division includes a Disposal Engineer, Disposal Superintendent, Assistant Disposal Superintendent, 27 custodians and 23 equipment operators. Equipment complement consists of fourteen International Harvester tractors, three Caterpillar D-7 tr.actors, six carryall .scrapers and two :rooters. The present annual budget is over $600, 000 of which approximately $450, 000 may be charged to operation and maintenance, bringing the present cost of disposal to approximately $1. 25 per ton. Collection Practice Under the existing program, the County is not concerned with the collection of trash, having assumed the.responsibility of disposal only. Residents of the County are provided with collection service in various ways: 1. As a municipal service paid for out of City tax funds. -3- R 't. -0- I.••, .R. 9 •il- FV '1b I 1 I I • �i r 1 1 r _•_ A •..1. RA � ..:.. .. - RI �--_ I .>' � 7 111 u 1,�:1:-I'� L�',A;z ll'-i� e'N'T 1 �..I�— , -.�II • I • y 1 Y. ... 1• I —._+Li" • �.11 G t I 1.'-I +, r I �� S. s I`�I— j. 1� .I �t •'� I I•~I I `•i III — ..•.'/�\ \ c ��l r�. I .I I. .I I a. 1 31 T- -- � � .� An �� w-� I I- „ , t /r I .-.I• �.._I--.J � I ,(,• � I e Y � _ -1 -I-I t tr� I-. I .f� .` � / e\I � � '' �•^ .. 9�•'�j,A[. �H O� ti O ,A_ , to l-T b 9 � Cc� _ _ 1`^•-u •� ,r a/�\ '� � IT^-, -� I 'I' •• t. I �•I -gin.' _ /(, J, i I � I � !I f�,- ,\~'� ��'✓ �/'1 \ �.1, I d/' — 1 '� \r I •.I i I 1 _{ _L_ ' acl+� '4 y. + li II -�?,�:�w u,c .�L�MA er oy, s�`�A rr ri-'Af�o .-.G --+.vim - ��' ' 5I. � /I �,nlcl_s I I I _,L- _I I,1 I r �� `�_„�r/ /' ! �� , ••�r.\�/;f \i /' ��� �\\ J� I sl R I I � .�"'•1 is � �� r � !yam -t ,i - � _' - \:,t.`���: �'`` r r� / „ t /f' --I--! — pl i ' �y I � v�.. �y`,�1 �;� _E�r' /\ 1••y/�Cvr-. \r � ._'� ,,r /" ""I'_-.�" , ifl I_ _�_. LI LM'.5 ! _ V /� \`N ,- a A .`` J`•\ O N rt P r el r Y I♦r III �� • r~\• '� _� a A I d R c \�I E i1 a T`.S�.. `R..; I �V I I t:— R(A N H•O _l�G L,9 1 III o �\ I / ,� �-I _—J -, I•I +I _ _ t Tra F- CAL.I 1�(_)11 N I A _�sl PORTIONS or AllJOINIFO COh�`\M:� Compiledf-canOManl and lrlvalc`;nt-e>m11 jjj _ I Ifi EXHIBIT A + . , DISPOSAL STATION A• '`a`'. SERVICE AREAS III January 1959 � I ;I - -r'r -- a. By City forces b. By private operators under City contract. 2. As a Sanitary District service paid for out of Sanitary District taxes. 3. By individually negotiated contract paid for directly by the resident. a. With private operators operating under County, City or District franchises. b. With private operators operating in non- franchised areas. Under Ordinance No. 645, the County may issue exclusive franchises to private collectors operating in unincorporated areas. The franchise grants exclusive rights within a particularly described area and at the same time makes the franchise .holder responsible for providing service to all who desire it within that area. Less than one-fifth of the unincorporated area of the County is included within franchise areas at the present time. City and District franchises have similar features. Orange County residents pay an.average of $1. 25 per month for once a week service. This then is the general picture of refuse collection and dis- posal service as it exists in the County today, and for the present the system is functioning satisfactorily. The .fundamenal concepts upon which this system is based: a. Local collection by municipal, district or private forces b. Disposal beyond the local haul by the County may also serve as the foundation for the County's future program. -4- III. PROSPECTS FOR THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE In order to determine how long this satisfactory service can be maintained with the present system of disposal facilities, a more detailed analysis of these facilities must be ,made. Of the eight dis- posal sites shown on Exhibit A, only three can be considered long- lived. These are Stations No. 9, No. 13 and No. 17. The other five, which we shall call the critical sites, _.have life expectancies varying � from three months to under two years. This is shown graphically on the chart entitled "Estimated Life Expectancy of Five Critical Sites, " Exhibit B. The Critical Sites - Description The following is-a brief description of each of .these critical sites: 1. The Golden West Street Disposal Station No. 10 is on a sunken peat bog located between Gothard and Golden West Streets, south of Talbert Avenue, in Huntington Beach. In January 1959 it had a remaining capacity of 800, 000 cubic yards; by June this had been re- duced to about 745, 000-cubic yards. 2. The Yorba Street Disposal Station No. 12 is an abandoned gravel pit located on a 10 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Chapman Avenue and Yorba Street, Orange. Its January capacity of 144, 000 cubic yards was reduced to 50, 000 in.June. As may be noted on Exhibit B, the site was temporarily closed shortly thereafter causing a spurt in deliveries to Station No. 19 located only 2-1/2 miles to the northeast. Station No. 12 will reopen in about November. 3. The Santiago Boulevard Disposal Station No. 19 is an .abandoned gravel pit on a nine acre lease on Santiago Boulevard r -5- a°:°:a=i°:s°a eanemeeeeu°e nueaea�eei°n°aeavemu6°emooi��eQen°ia�mo°a°s�ne�iaeeae=o°m�i:C°m°�e°:i°a mace=°ems°mi='e�:CC°aC7 iCC�Ms ee �eeeeeeueee=:eEee�seee� e °°°°°:°°:::m:::::::a:meC�ae=e:::iq=:t::mmaea=aun��m°aanil Bumm�aaaimmmamaeioaaam€�=a� eee e°e°:eeeeeen�mCeeeeeeeammmoeeeemeaaeeeeeeeouuuneeemeeemeeeeieeiucea��Qeoeameeeim�i�uom°am°asem�eee�aueoemm'au°aa•.roQeeee��e�u°sueuae eye==eeiva��:ens eon I n 181..11481me1mm nil eeemeeemeeoeeeoo1°numeomemnloeemeeoelaiameeommueoeeemmm°leuiomnoe°eeeemee� :eenunEee IM HQ�uemeemea:menee°eeeuSeeu °m::aaHIUHmaie oaaanaeaaammme:iaQ=emQamimi�°1111110011111111111 nq°a�°aaingn:°°°°°n°°°°°nab°ma°mac a°� ago° aiie:Q:maq=a°:Q:=o:iQ:ma==fin°°:aURN- eneeeeeeeen a emnm°�lioneeaseiele°s°q°�ameiiieiiiiuiimemeuue�ieneeee�mmiei°seem°m�IN ilun°aieee::Bgr®°a�`^-nimie�C unumall:l:uumiema�vemei=°aa°seWe=°s eeam°a.•m nmu113111 Q:nnueeeennememem::en umeeen uumiem°enn®uemm�uunmmem°a°aeieennemmen°eoeu ero°°m°=n e °t ,m� fir.'-'4°®meeonauwe u mu mee9mn- eu°° niunle �neeee®°ulneeemuuueeemuunmmomemumeeemeeeeeuueeeeeeeemenuroeeemmmmgmn®uneo°� ua=me aen3�uuuuuuuum°°m®ne�imame� a°!C uememmin�n?,��°eemmn°n°uemmiemmmegemimmummeeoeammnummmeeemeen:nemmouCau°am�amgemm°°:eq:m°aQ°aaeimmaee��'�immai�a�iunummunnm"'iam:e�nman°�num'°meal e°n�3 ameeee°aII eeiemoummommmno°°nemeeeeuemeeeeuum°emQemoenummmmnmmanoa°eeoe°I 0°anmsouneoeeo%moainmmnomeeuuanmmiue e�oeme:nQnanomena°o,me°om°m°°Qe III m :inn°mmeemme�liuuuinil:uu umuuamam°°mne=mauu role° mroe Qmngmamaggmmro agamn aaro0eamsgammaQnaanQmq°°q:m°° Qgeese eeeseeexeeeeeeeeeeeexeeeeeeeemeeeeeeeViII +au=.1CIM•IPA01I!N:4-eeeee a ee�esssuee x xeernexmmeexeeeexeexemeemeee �Q°°i��l` i�mR�C�Y�®nvue�uteeeeeen®�® �un�0 ®n1�ll�l�i ®N�A0�°�linlmm®� u"IINe n�li�t66iE16 Luau®n�Cmmm� I °i°91q°m�m°m°°I '°iYQDnII mCa°Qa°`amHIrommmC®emoennmmemmm°a.°�Inanuaunn°Im°na,nnlllmu®IanlemCu�min°A�mmnmm�n1u�®nll®® ;M + M J=C3miv mmmmummn1111noIN0 Hill nenN011 :qm o =a:a:q�e�+:mm�mmmroroe:o:mi:unnnnnnnmmnneannnnmmmne: ne nu nine nmum n° ®, inunnmeronmgoonmmoan em nmmmmeia�mmmiamnna:mmmmmnaimmnnnuiiitiinmmnammonnunm::iummeinnimmm�roru� �n�ive aieoaroroaaroromiam aame:anaa au�m IN! ..nmro:mumm mmmm�inutimumm nnnmmnnetummmno nmenm®o:remun u UP1111 ®nameoroq nnu�nemonm ° C� °n°eean o°.°m°.uu°mmmC:iuummumenni u°mmmliemuu=um°n°ironmuu° iiuuwueni"nnrommunnn®i�°m:°�mamaroam�®mmmmuunnnea Dun Qum u u inuuummi:n°u°clue=m:.°amnnuunnnl:uiiiiuuu® uummuuuuuuuuunua1°mmnumm�ennnnn°iuuueummm®ue°mennm°°me::i::e:erom®monnnn is®un 10�°u®uunie°o�°emeeQ°aoaeeu eeeau�ee eee°niinnmu®nn e11emuunuuuunnuu tm No oiluu�°uniouaQ°i°e°mnuu°:°imm°q°®m°°°°m� 11°omma uummum:imn mroe:Qenaoems �eeromememuu®®naiu�numilo®nem: IIIMn nnn v1-1IM- 14 F.-7u=rogm°nuaeq a:lluu ui°on megmoanemgqmiumgqqq=mnnm��a�aa:uemnnnnnmaunnnnnnnn�eunnmm�mmnma=puree-mmr]En®nmeuuwgaieaemnnmem:n seen Run n meem®umum°meu°ml°mlun°mam® •r`,�m°�amni®nueeme°eni�mu�nro�nnu®:un°eieuumauu� numuuela:�awmemi°®mull nleroge°emnnnneeun �n non 1e immm�iee.Qann:mnmi:in�i�ee nunmaminnnneeA'�'meunnnnn n nroeeeome�(mm u anon - • inmimnmromromm mnnromm roan mmn n mnmennmmtnromnitmmamnmm®. :mnunmronnnnnunnmeaun�°isanuaaiinnronmmunnroro°meiumunnummoun°:°°a: ounmoen.•anmmmmiuu®ava°7iQnaeoem=o°ammmemm°u®imiineimimlena�muiimiva®®e ®®umm°1�i ®°�nll°uiuum°°°I°n-�mmmu°eiam°Illmi�nuo°e°muimam:ummnmu ma�Ini°�mimammu nu=ueenig °°�°�:Q°a°ae°am°°nmumoe a°:u'im°eu°in°iu®ueeu ®�®lin°m ®�nnw�nii ue® �ne°1i Deco Iunet�°u®euaueeeneme°C:mmmuunmmuu- nn somms"� ° � Q , eu mgaemgrogmmaiemmaoee:mmagoaos::gmmmmmm�u mni� mmmomae►�®mmnnmmumann � �oemm�iummaen®®maammemgeorom: n■■: N4l maonoi�e:ma:mamieQQeeoaN:pmam9 �!e� �.,] ,,�° :m �;!4�®o�mNw:am�e�muYY��!INNN�:�!��®�mamm��=aeeeeNaeome�e;en m m® ai =mmmtmmieNw.■N■■wN■■YN� N wwwo .Y ...■■Nw NN N N N■■■■ww■N.wwwwNNNN■■N inm=aa: uemmmronemn:amigeaea:as:::ma:mmemman�::unli hem 'i=meeuommm e�Qtm miimm•'�u' Nnm°Qenm° nuuuq:a:=um=:ro:a in Al mitma=m:ommmmro=emmmnnimnnmm�mmmnimentitrom�inms�mmieic�miim uuun nnummi mo: a®me:eie:mmetaaro=a:i:=a m mm�::®mm�mmgmngemne:mnne ttmnnaeemmn nneonos -�imc��mmmnmmoei mmmm umromnmmnmromm�iomgm m:mmnmmmnm::eunn::Qmaa:annn::C°umimnleeunmmH°mlaaellunmmumm° �emmmnmmgmiNMI umiun:mm:iromnmcl°muuululmmgmaaq en� °an°i nl=ammnuueaamllnmnm omuu ;ee lluum un �un1°Q1°o°eio mumamu mmmunuanimmilil:iimmllu�u � ROUNDUP m you nil i°ma�lio°°muml° a iui®emu:°9muffiname meommneeeeneeeeeeemedeineomeennmn ° umou noun u �. anuueoen®anemimQeseomnm®ee'�im:mummmummm�lomeeeeum:nneemu aaiunnu® urO m nn®.1ao m n:nmmammm°amnmenon a°un®A:uuii I ;uuunu 41i:om mmammroimmmngmmme:gmmnminniin mnnnmmro= mQ m HBO an ummmmiumm lmmnnumn®mam m unaa=:nmmummnnn m :q��Ca ae®::aa mm=leaven=:mgaaam:emx:m:agimmmmmm:romiaamuu®ummummmm®emeoiam®mama:cum®mivaemmummae�.::maairorosemmanweeirom�m n:aaame°�e°eQmmmnaoniooza:q:Q:aammi:Pronee°:e°:mimnmmeannaamm�noinn:mums=eemnnmmnaiamamnmmmmm�m:na.aoo.�mmmironnmiuroroamimaoae ■ ■■■■ xeeeeeeee►_r��rareiesi��.currire.yrl� �xeauux®sseexemee®xexexxxxweexxxeexaxesxxexeeeeee.aeW.��exxeeeaeemeeeeeeeeeee m■ammmQmtnm_-�M� ����r■�■f�■i■■■■■■■�■ YAK'i!.■■■YB�■N���■0■■�G�■���■�Yq�YON�O��■OYY�G�G-■■�rO��■�lN�\.�VNr�ANYY��N���■ :mm� =:mm mAQQAm LQ/.1 ill■Fl�i1J1• .fwwwY_O■••■•■Ow wN.Y••••1wO0■•O\1•w•...\NY••tlNYwN■•w mmmmmmammnmto:meiRNTZ•■r�7f1If�1�,1��S.L■■w■N\NNNNNwwN■■■■NNYYYYVNYYw■�•■NYO.■Y■ONY■■M��YYN YN•N■NwNYNw- :®neagmmmin:eoo oommmeb �eU"Wiiei�ea �Nuronnnmium ammo wmnmm�a.mmmmmeemmmmn®mmoin�, eimniominuni:Qmooa: °uq:a=aumaQm:em° :ammnaineennmminn:ammmamm:mnnmumnnmm�°m°NunnnmrouuuunroeinnQmm�mamumma®m=mai. dmmmmn®mmomama:=i ameaemmmmmmtmimngromeemmm�mm�minmummmmm i■mueamam�.mmmeonmmmmmmmnnme�mnmmmRHMERUNI -. Inmaa:°:uuuuumm- :QeQ:Q::mumomnQogmimmammmm�::iimammummnmmnm m mm�nmm aanennmmm=i:mmmmuimnummiaam®e �►� ,nm:mmmm= 1:n mmmumumuroanmmaanmromaiaea:immmumiitnimteimuulemamum=nmm iiimu°Inuuunnmmuelumm=e°:nn as�mroNunnaeOn .ismmmiamm=momnnnnmmmQmmmnnrom®mmnaemonuumieienmmmnn:maeLigmem®uummunnn nmmmnmaenaenm�u®►�=nmm:mmm m ::mmQaeeaimmeimmu::mmQamn:roannuuunlnaQ:nneeiaemimmmmronnmammei:�rvmmmn�nlnimmo►�°I°ronnmmi:i:Cnmimm�lllmWa=mule=m is m°m°neeeinna!°Qunnnuneltau°emnnQaeQuam� lem'® nmmlmm�m Emu a ®auummunmmnnum>�ronumi°:mnui°q �r n®®nnn- m m�: ammmmummmmimnneim nimmmmmm omn=:atmmmtinmmm:mn::mnuimamemromm�nmm�nuntm:mmmmnnmmunimnunm �u=tmemtamentn �e�te:ammamnma: t::am aQUQemm� emoeoeeaueunmu:uummumuemse°n mmuQ°°Qum=em°n°u°1®®uemi°nlet�ie® et t®uuuu®uuu inmINN °�m °e�°nm '°m°�°amt°°ve:®mmau6°me�° mnauameo ®u °mouu :°=QaQrommmmmmmeemneammmaene:u nmumumromnm n t mmum uummm�te ' �i�u ro. mm:=:ane ro ►Ion anml: eeagmmtmmumammmm®Qmmmtmmomemtimnauenmm�mmm�u�anmisammu innmwnu ate��a®uumummmo<i.ommnnQ t mmmh ME .Q■nqulmu u:ium:m:imneeuaamaaunumtinmimmttm u linmm m unummnronm ' Mammonm ;,peon "iiium -.iimmn roil. ae:gmronmaommmnt nammmmanrorommmnimimmmm:nnmmimmmnii v n°°u0vieu�uum m �ngmemA,�mm�oD a:E�__ ramie aQ::aQ=aaeomommmroaeaanromm::tattmnu®nataimrotiantia a tuuutt aam gtnammm aama:W um: m:m•ia°°: :::::aoemiaemmnnaamromroai:oa::ammmunmm oral aiimuunta u m ummmummit u am �amgmf. oaaP`n mmaam eeeeeeea�n®uuuu:eeuinroueeuu®iQ°auuiitliuuuii°o°uu Criuu man 1 °m uulm mu��� '°®m� ��uu mnmme:anasa:i _> ::::memmm:ma ®nallanaiuu°°I°ummianmmamn®®nnimtnnmuaa°Iuun®m°Immaa°e®e�iennu°aQ®nmannu a°nnu:n�n ► ::::: mmmeaim011 'm :Von unm=°am°m°naauuuu°n°im°tmQmu•.uuueimumii m°utlum®ro ®mnrona mietnmgemmsmmi:nmm:anmemm®ron •�eee�aooi�amr:111OW�11%m on mameemn=iumb mmnnmmnmmnummQemmm®mummuammuummmm�mno.mmie�vm��e���m °::::=:anemeiamn:nieemmneeneinmimnmeetetemtmneam:tmtmimmmnammmmnnmummmummimmmmmu nmm:mb gUn..e .; -a= erase°iz'°o°o°eroC:omsscame,°•ummuuuuueomeiwop°maomuumauu®meuauune�iuunnnnum :ans°n =na nPu°l®ei=eiemmuuum utantmliaumnmummunalnnti=uumnumm®m=IromQ°mtenaiuummlnm°u®m:nnaalu=iam®:ammnmim�ua®:Qmimaaemann:e�n=a�m:m:mm:uie�viomal m° a°m:n== noum:ammna=a=aromnmuul°mmmamnammmmma :::qe:::q:Qaim:gmmnmge:mtgm:aumoummaQueienuneeeinnomttnn nnnnnmronotmmnnmm�mm:emmm®mmmnmmmmm ..:e:aQa:sQmae:a;. . :sin:SBORsnam naa:a: aaam°am�mmti°la°aonianp�a°monte titnm mmmnmmmi nroe nanmai ianr::ama:meio::aaam:e:e:: :s:i:::: :t.uggMUCUQQu�° a:mme�:aaamnt.nmtanmm�aattmammm �ie:mau�mmi:ai=luunngi mmuaemnnmr-_tom:ai=ge:amm1:�=:: :::::M W�::::UHH:mQQm4 amrommmmmnc� mmninnam <<:aaarom=nmmmen�nmroamimmmmeaer uumnmmmm tea:e:m::::::mmt:aaIII RHISH ■ o n » ■ » ■ ■■ Yr ■ uuuu ms'�:°=°zeeu�euem Qm�nn'°namauiuc tim�uunmemmn®° unuamen®muememm mQ°�mlueinuunme ®®memumn®nnn aQ°Qmeeaaneeee CC=GQ 'IHH i ■u■ ■ u ■ ■ r ono eamQmn=mnnnnnnnmm�eman Ed pmm�inmi mmntemmm�romaanmmmmne=mno •:•••..•••.QQm:e::mace::aa==gram:=il:mainmmm!'!Clpam;fiqP�4'lN�R:1 !e !-Ya=mmrommmmmmnmmammro ' ■r■■■■■■■■.. ••••••••••••Tamar- -a�+�a:r: anma=aasanmo:taaa�m m � dd�eamemie��ddh mimtinnmae�:mui:uurom:= . . - . :::::::::::::•.:::::aY���a::::��aq::iorame:eanntmeema=memo=mmnmmam uemmm:aims:ma:=Qmamm�m==ama:r�m:ie :::::::Q:::::::::Q:::Q °::::::Q:::i°Q:::QQQ. =QQitt:gSaa:=:am=am gnNnmQmmagmQQnngnairoqQ=Q==mn::L'mia:°:°°° just south of the Santiago Creek. The capacity of this site was 440, 000 cubic yards in January dropping to. about 415, 000 in June. Closure of Station No. 12' has increased• the rate of fill construction but this is expected to drop off again when Station No. 12 is reopened, 4. The Garden Grove Disposal Station No. 15 is an abandoned sandpit of 12 acres located on the north side of Chapman Avenue at Buaro Street. Its January capacity was 324, 000 cubic yards, reduced to approximately 175, 000 by June. 5. The Stanton Avenue Disposal Station No. 18 is an abandoned sandpit of about 18 acres located at Stanton Avenue and Highway 39 in- Anaheim. In January it had a remaining capacity of 530, 000 cubic yards• which was reduced to about 295, 000 cubic yards by June. The Critical Sites - Life Expectancy The progressively decreasing capacity of these sites may be followed by an examination of Exhibit B. If, as indicated, Station No. 12 is reopened in November, it should be the first to reach capacity at the beginning of January. This I closure will restore to Station No. 19 the same rate of fill construction now existing. Shortly thereafter, assuming continuation of its present rate, Station No. 15 will be filled to capacity. By this time, it is assumed that .the County's new long range Disposal Station No. 20 in Olinda will be in operation. In that event the service areas of the County.'s disposal stations will be as shown on Exhibit C. This exhibit deserves some special attention; it will be noted that the more densely populated service areas are fairly well encompassed by the 5-mile radius circles centered at the various sites. It therefore provides a graphical representation of -6- . r _ i rz s fw : - .r Y, • f r e 1 I - - - � � i I' T•�• + f I, "�'� r .� 'II II if + - ��i i'�' � Ij•n°,Lf A I '•11 0� 0 9 A A M IIT 0 8 - _ Cy .I.` _ .` \r'.:J/✓ k .\� / Y � ry� r •i ,I fi.� zz t , - _ _ •.I- � -N +l i'I I 'I� - Ffjr: � _ �� ` ,e -' __ ___ ' - _ � I i' ` �A N C M A� B/O H T t�0 �.,�� ••:�v I S Y Poll.•J.I I -� I _I. -I , - I �!� � •�'� 9 /` jY//� /, � .-i,\-'...r \\t _•e —•— -r 7 •O 'N TA• N ! Lim I I � - :y r I � I 1 � va ,r _ ,����'�- J��`z r i f�. / � �,�° •I TTT I ip.. �J���-I �, hF 1 I" '�- \ ��� sp\Y�I .f ^��\��\ ��¢ ,r/J i /j� re v i �• I '�.4 • 1 L J - r -- � i• .-f x� ( \�:- V t.,a '�_ p�•F4iiil } ..�fc �rwi-...•e ..�1- ewr LI .\ -- _I�•• /ems I - at• f�,- - .c , r N I i -A N c H O M 1 0 ` I T.—IN fir' NTY C1U.I F01a N 1/N k I �,�, -. wrvP r \, IIrx inl•� - - I PORTIONS oi.AU.IOININO COI;NNEy GwP v ' ��{ueT i.i Compilydll•nmCNlicinlunJl'rirNcSHrv..yn µ \ - _ "'�\ III,,, �I �� .EXHIBIT C DISPOSAL STATION SERVICE AREAS Jor!r..ry 1960 that which has come to be considered the standard of equal and equitable service to almost all residents of the County. Reference to Exhibit B, however, indicates that this ideal condition will have a very brief existence. For, in spite of the opening of the new Olinda site, the immediate effect of the closure of Station No. 15 is to increase the rate of delivery to Station No. 18 so that its small remaining capacity is filled in a matter of days. The disposal station service area picture will then appear.as shown on Exhibit D, and for the first time a large densely populated area in the northwestern part of the County will lie outside the five mile radius circles. The closure of Station No. 18. will create a tremendous increase in the rate of fill construction at the two remaining criti- cal sites. At Station No. 19 the rate will jump to 55, 000 cubic yards per month, chiefly due to deliveries from Anaheim .which were previously directed to No. 18. At this new rate, Station No. 19 will reach capacity in August 1960 and the service area picture is altered to that shown on Exhibit E. The area outside the reference circles will have more than doubled and will include the most densely populated section of the County. This will leave Station No. 10 as the last remaining dis- posal site in the northwest section of the County, and, at its ac- celerated rate of fill construction, it too will finally reach capacity by June 1961. At that. time, less than two years from today, the County's estimated population will be about 800, 000 with approximately 300, 000 living in the northwest. Exhibit F indicates the extent to which the -7- r - - _- -- , �. o r' ✓ - �. ,...._ -... > :. I n I 6 -it� ° '-• -rd 'j 1. �_:I� t � w t. �- , i .....T - 41, _ d_• t 1 I Y"/- :I �!pH I•�i I - �A . / `` � '- -' _- --�' !- } yam.-"'� I ���//'9C � , u � '• ,�I It A. ..H❑� ..09 -A -A!-t LIT89 �� a{1 /� �� � r � � .�, >� _ � o i A ny, s�•q N T f A 1 /.1,�."-.� �•.t,! I - to I r�l I� �• _�� I :I I-� r i - ,.\� a �� �°�\ � I :sl _ _ ,_i -'•,: ,/f —i_ it f� i.• r \ j X\ / \'./\v P;(7 -;' I� -� �, I 0�1 N TiA-I N ' - - L. l '•r\ l \/ \\, w✓ ' r 1 _ �- t�- _ - I. t ''i,_ r�- ,a J/ \�;/ ,y� L awl• �+ \- 1 nnvL.n, 1 ��.���- .y,;, �{�,L I! �•—' `�"�\� `ley .� �e � ,- n% /' _. I,; �- 13 I � '� •!-� S"-� >f rr �• x �. H��\s2 A-�y,��+ /�-'!N'� .N°��/ - r j l�a�•I�� I ICI, i o A t• _ !n\ _ f xj� � -I-•�i - \ 11� J 0 UH II o '`\�' Yam ® _ ' ' r� v �Z CALIFORNIA . PORTIONS or•ADJOINING COUNTIES I Compiled llvm(NfiAalnndlNvntr Snn,�•s kYT. I_ __ I +I EXHIBIT D � is Yf• \i� { ; .I DISPOSAL STATION \ i SERVICE AREAS February 1960 ' -J ---- — > ❑ •P. w . • 1 M 1 I � •.•• r — n I , 4L , ...6... I• I � I� �., III ., X,w 1 0 I __ I — fil i u I I �I. L- I- r ,_ el - - � .,{.y• :rF1�,- ,T� J/� Jf //�.�;/ ���I .r� �`.° I'- ,` »-�-:tom _ ;.' '(`,.i- ✓ x i`��•r� 1. f - .. \� Zr, : I i � - sIs -� I r 1 I ,1� I��J \! y �\ •�;-_• I " wyy I I I lO i A 9 N T l , I ••W'•- I - - li -1 _ - r ',� !• ` .`%� �• r `-- � CFI •.� � /�` ° � '". �j"s � /\' 'X Y`-. �I IS N- �O 9 11 I I---1 — -.I• ,W .1. X .. •Y ]I '� ' �� / _ Kr \ Lin. . , + a �- -- ° - --. WIl;;- I Imo•. �r J..::.' `{. - o j.. ^,7 �J ' �- r .' �� •� -'� Ogyp\\ I �j;.. aI ', — tom_ 1I I�'� �\•u� �/r(� -;rf�\ s w°�\� I/ f u; / - ;M1�\ :�-+; •,•��, i Nrwrnxr r.A�H = _ y- � �0,, \ ,°� ,�I• (L 1 .: . ,. .. Ili ✓ I , I t r 1 r � �I-• I � i • %! 4 ULM 71 Ak T•n r. (�]•'�"f�tl1tJ i►'�1�-� - r�jf __ _L.• _. ..en +l -ftk,.Ul IOU" E COUNTY CALIFORNIA I' R: I.. lal '011TIONS OFADJOINING COUNTS . I T. Compiled lFpm0111cinlnnd Private Sue .mt _ ✓ t A I, EXHIBIT E �i I. I DISPOSAL STATION SERVICE AREAS August 1960 1`':�4j, _1 standard of service for this large segment of the County's population will have deteriorated. If the County is to prevent this picture from developing, it is obvious that plans must be set in motion immediately. Experience has already shown that even in dealings with friendly property owners, a period of two years or more elapses between the time of initial contact and .the opening of the disposal sLte to the public. If the steps we take now are to benefit us in the long range future, they must be in the right . direction, and the right direction can only be determined if the ultimate needs of Orange County. IV. ORANGE COUNTY'S ULTIMATE NEEDS Estimated Ultimate Population Orange County's ultimate refuse disposal needs are in direct proportion to its ultimate population. Studies made by the Orange County Planning Commission, the Associated Chambers of Commerce, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and the Southern California Edison Company report an estimated population of two million by the year 1980, and the more recent Stanford Research Institute Report goes as high as two and one-half million. Although these figures are indicative of the present trend, they serve only as stepping-stones for our purposes here, inasmuch as it is the ultimate potential of the County which is of interest. It will therefore be neces- sary to rely on the figure presented by the Planning Commission in its yet incomplete study. . . . . . a population of three million in the County -8- -�4 C 0 '-Rfl 6. _ .�4'I�-_ '_I 1 •. ..• I f •-- -. �•' 1 ��II .P w,. • e a I • i ` V I- � '' ��' �,` -��' 1-P I'" , J Iy Tom' ��' I ? I I �//•• � �(�� ..� 1 - _� ..� c I I---1 2 _ ��✓._' r�/ I .a_ 1 1e .�'} '��`�j' ���/G r 1 4 li , -I u. H '.p����ee .1✓ /,a I r-JF �,, , 1' • 7'• I r If O 1,fJ 9 A A M I T O 9_• _ [ 1=- a }�j1 F. 1 I i '• I•',}/ I -[ d` MI I I ;a -I. I I. f _ ,� �/ �� / ' l `� �.t.. � _I. - .�.., 1 I M-L Lc Pill-Hr- Ve I d-- �� - /i T 1 - I � 5� ' P n�1 , t�l�d i'4`. Ir o'a n's'�• y 3;A x T f ,��� ..1 I -'�'(.i � I I { I �r ��:.- I' I - y � P hf1 +y i•I— I_., ?7 \'<f�' /r_'r i •" X ,y � \ 1 I SI �n I � H, I�F. I .�.�y:..-� � i� `��')�r,7��'�x� `r ' '•i l'`/•g �c-' -� ��- f- I i � ��! F 0y��1,-N-,T;A -N .«.-., �'F \J V �•yt .. -��as r^,I. 0.'l0 In ! '1 GV 4.LILEY �..•.II. ; / ,/R�/ F�• •!C �« tyr � T rA Y•1; /J Qrll T N Pt _ / 44 IA tit 'lot I A N C H O Li Tr EXHIBIT 6= DISPOSAL STATION Ll SERVICE AREAS June 1961 tom`'!C-111 in its condition of maximum possible density. If this figure seems high, it should be kept in mind that a population of that magnitude exists today within the city limits of Los Angeles and its immediately adjacent environs. That this figure is attainable is of greater concern, for the purposes of this report, than the exact year in which it becomes a reality; but, as a matter of interest, it may be pointed out that if present trends continue it is entirely reasonable to assume that the saturated condition may be reached by the year 2000. It will therefore be convenient in this report to designate subsequent references to this saturated condition as "Situaticn 2000. " Definition of Terms. Before an attempt is made to determine what this figure means with regard to refuse production, it would be desirable to define the terms that will henceforth be used to describe the various forms of refuse, especially since all localities do not adhere to the same usage. 1. Refuse: The inclusive term for all garbage and solid and liquid wastes, excepting sewage, which originate -from normal household, business, commercial and industrial activity. 2. Garba e: Wastes from the preparation, G-ooking and con- sumption of food originating in homes, restau- rants, markets and food processing plants. 3. "Non-combustible Trash: Tin cans, scrap metal, bottles, glass, crockery, ceramics, ashes and other household, yard, com- mercial and business refuse which will not burn. 4. Combustible Trash: Paper, cardboard, wood, tree and yard trim- mings, grass, rags, rubber, plastics and other -9- household, yard, commercial and business refuse which will burn. 5. Industrial Wastes: Rotary mud, acids, chemicals and other liquid wastes resulting from industrial processes and manufacturing and canning operations. 6. Inert Materials: That form of non-combustible trash which in- cludes street sweepings, dirt, paving, rubble, plaster and other construction and inorganic material. Although these terms for the various classifications of refuse do not coincide with the ones established in 1941 by the American Public Works Association, they are the terms commonly in use in Orange County and are the most familiar. Estimated Ultimate. Refuse Production Correlating refuse production to population requires the use of an appropriate figure for daily per capita production. In its previous studies Orange County has used the figure of three pounds per capita, approximately the same figure presented in the Rawn Report. (The Rawn Report, "Planned Refuse Disposal, " was prepared in September 1955 by the joint administrative staff of the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and is probably the most complete report of its type published to date. It is fortunate that Orange County has access to this report inasmuch as the two Counties are similar in so many ways - geography, climate, type of residential, industrial and commercial development. Therefore, wherever applicable, full advantage will be 'taken of the considerable research conducted by the staff of the Sanitation Districts into the various phases of refuse disposal and frequent references to the Rawn Report will be made.) Approximately two pounds per capita are contributed by the , average residential household, the remainder coming from commercial -10- and industrial establishments appurtenant to the population in a metropolitan county. It is interesting to note that since publication of the Rawn Report, Los Angeles County has been able to record actual weights of refuse delivered .from certain localities and has found sufficient evidence to corroborate the three pound per capita figure. It should also be pointed out that this was after the elimina- tion of back yard incineration. Inasmuch as the elimination of back yard incineration is imminently expected in this county as well, it is felt that the three pounds per capita figure is applicable for the purposes of this report. This means that in "Situation 2000" the County will be confronted with the responsibility of disposing of 4500 tons of refuse per calendar day. The ultimate need of the County, therefore, is to provide a system which will dispose of this quantity of refuse in the most satisfactory and economical manner. V. METHODS OF DISPOSAL Incineration Burning of combustible refuse in open dumps is probably the most primitive form of refuse disposal still in existence in many communities throughout the United States. The obnoxious effects of odors, smoke .and poor sanitation are obvious. Although providing great economy for the rural county where burning can be controlled and sites can be located far from populated areas the idea of such a facility in Orange County, 10Situation 2000", does not warrant further consideration. Back yard incineration, a phenomenon peculiar to .Southern California, will discontinue its present minor role in Orange County's refuse disposal picture in the near future as a result of an expected ban by the Air Pollution Control District. -11- Incineration im well-designed, property operated multi- chambered municipal plants, however, does merit consideration as a satisfactory method of refuse disposal. These incinerators generally fall into two broad categories according to method of charging: (1) direct dumping (2) pit and crane. The former type represents an attempt to reduce the cost of initial construction by eliminating the need for storage facilities and increasing furnace capacity so that refuse delivered can be dumped directly into the furnace. Unfortunately, it is seldom feasible to control the schedul- ing of deliveries which would insure a smoothly flowing charging operation. Storage on the charging floor and outside the incinerator then becomes necessary and the extra cost of the small dozer or skip-loader needed to charge this temporarily stored refuse, detracts from the anticipated saving. In addition, open storage of the refuse even for comparatively brief periods of time has its unsanitary as- pects making site location difficult in the saturated condition expected for "Situation 2000. 11 It is probably for these reasons that most larger municipal incinerators in the United States are today being built with storage pits and overhead charging cranes. This type of installation lends itself to uniform charging and selection of material according to moisture content which.will result in :,more efficient combustion, and at the same time offers greater flexibility of operation. Incinerator plants consist of one or more incinerator units de- pending upon the overall capacity based on tons of material burned per -12- twenty-four hours. A typical unit may be described as follows, in the sequence of the burning cycle: 1. A charging hopper of sufficient capacity to con- tain enough refuse for one burning cycle. 2. A grate upon which the refuse is deposited from the opper through a manually or mechanically operated charging ate. . It is on the grate that the refuse is first ignited by the radiant heat from the hot refractory walls of the monition cham- ber. Air is supplied.at this point and temperatyres are usually maintained between 14000 and 1800 F. Built-in automatic stoking promotes burning and prevents clinker formation. At the same time, the burning refuse is steadily being moved through the ignition chamber, the residue is dumped into an ash pit for subsequent collection and the grates are ready for a new charge. 3. Meanwhile, the burning cycle continues as air and combustion gases pass around and over the burning refuse and into the combustion chamber where high temperatures are maintained and burning is com- pleted of all gases and particles. 4. After leaving the combustion chamber, the gases en- ter a baffled expansion chamber where the decrease in velocity results in separation' of the fly ash. 5. If additional fly ash must be removed, a spray chamber may be provided. Meanwhile, draft is controlled y a damper which may be located between the combustion c am er and the expansion chamber, or between the ex- pansion chamber or spray chamber and the flues. In the latter position, it also serves to close off any unit not in operation. 6. The gases then enter the flues and depart into the atmosphere via the chimney stack. However efficient this combustion may be, the 8516 of the refuse burned which is exhausted into the atmosphere requires the installation of apparatus specifically designed to attempt to bring stack effluents within the limits permitted by the Air Pollution Control District. 'Attempt" is evidently the appropriate term. In spite of the fact that the City of Los Angeles' Lacey Street incinerator emits the cleanest effluent of any -13- plant in the country, it apparently is still not meeting the require- ments of the APCD. Another disadvantage of incineration is the fact that additional provision, probably in the form of landfill, must be made for the disposal of the residue of ash and non-combustibles as well as for the disposal of all other forms of non-combustible refuse, not introduced into the incinerator, such as industrial wastes, building debris and inert material. Although there is an advantage in the possibility of'combined collection of wrapped garbage and combustible trash, it is more than offset by the fact that non-combustible trash, such as bottles and -tin cans, would have to be segregated. The major benefit of disposal by incineration lies in the possible convenience of location. A well-operated and designed plant can be strategically located in any industrial area so that length of haul can be kept to a minimum. Incinerator construction costs are usually cited in terms of dollars per rated ton of twenty-four hour capacity and various sources indicate a wide range for the pit and crane type. The Rawn Report esti- mates a range of $3900 to $5000 per rated ton. (Note: These cost figures and subsequent cost refer- ences in this report derived from other sources, have been updated by application of the estimated "Engineering News-Recordlf cost index factor. Los Angeles'- Gaffey Street incinerator built in 1955 would cost today ap- proximately $3800 per rated ton. Lower costs-however are feasible. Wegman reports in June 1958 "Civil Engineering" that the new 300-ton incinerator in Binghamton, . N. Y. was built at a cost of $3000 per ton. Public Works of June 1958 reports that -1 4- the East Hartford, Connecticut 200-ton plant cost $2550 per ton, but its short stack is neither typical nor desirable. An excellent report by Koebig and Koebig, Consulting Engineers for the County of Los Angeles, outlined plans for a 500-ton incinerator in the Inglewood area. Estimated construction costs averaged $3100 per ton in today's dollars, although the plant was never built. Costs of operation and maintenance also show a wide range. Rawn's report lists operating costs of incinerators in Los Angeles County in 1955, several of which have since been abandoned. The average cost today excluding amortization of the capital investment, would be $3. 94 per ton of refuse burned. Koebig and Koebig's analy- sis estimated an average operating cost equivalent to $3. 00 per ton. The Binghamton Plant reported a maintenan.ce and operation cost of $2. 69 in 1957 with an indicated reduction in 1958. The relative worth of all these figures may be analyzed to provide the upper and lower limits of the possible cost of municipal incineration in Orange County, "Situation 2000. " In order to take advantage of the possibility of convenient location and minimum haul, it is assumed that plants would be situated in a pattern similar to that shown in Exhibit C. Each plant would therefore require a twenty-four hour capacity of approximately 700 tons bringing capital investment to somewhere between 2 and 3-1/2 million dollars per plant. Assuming a 4-1/2% thirty year amortization, this cost would range between $0. 48 and $0. 84 per ton. Adding this to the apparent.range of operating costs results in an overall cost varying between $3. 17 and $4. 78 per ton of refuse burned. As a point of reference, this may be compared to the -15- indicated Macey Street incinerator cost of $4 to $5 per ton, including installation and operation of its air pollution control equipment. Composting Composting may be defined as a biochemical process which alters the composition of organic material into a stable, humus-like.. end product. The practice of composting is almost as ancient as man and is fundamentally a result of the accumulation of the raw material into a concentrated mass in which fermentation through the action of bacteria and other microorganisms is allowed to take place. These microorganisms are the type .naturally found in the soil, aerobic-as well as anaerobic. After a period of time, varying anywhere from two and one-half days to several months, depending upon the particu- lar process, and involving mixing, turning, watering, aeration and continual temperature change, an end product suitable as a soil con- ditioner will result. Since approximately two-thirds of municipal refuse consists of organic material such as paper, garbage, lawn and garden trimmings and produce market and cannery wastes, considera- tion may be .given to the feasibility of using the composting process as a means of refuse disposal. Furthermore, the prospect of pro- ducing a valuable product from something of negative value has excited many an imagination, and in recent years, considerable research and investigation into the subject has been conducted by several universities and private promoters throughout the country. Modern refuse composting may be divided into two general .classifications, according to method: (1) by hatching or windrows and -16- (2) by mechanical digestion. Windrow composting obviously in- volves the stockpiling of the refuse into windrows or stacks after a certain amount of manual or mechanical reduction. Periodic turning by bull-dozer or similar devices takes place depending upon moisture and temperature. However, even the most efficient processes take at least ten to fourteen days, and this length of time would require sites probably too large to be strategically located within the Orange County of "Situation 2000. " Bulletin No. 1 of the University of California's Sanitary Engineering Research Project estimates the required land area to serve a population of 500, 000 as being between twelve and eighteen acres. The Rawn report estimates a range between ten and twenty-five acres, and Bulletin No. 9 of the UC, SERP, estimates a land need of as much as fifty acres for an • open field windrow operation. As for cost, Bulletin No. 1 estimates the batching operation in the older European processes as varying between $4. 70 and $5. 80 per ton of refuse composted. The more recent Rawn report estimates open field windrow costs between $2. 00 and $3. 00 per ton. The more feasible approach for the metropolitan county.is that in which the composting process is completely mechanical, and in which temperature, humidity and ventilation are carefully regulated. Mechanical composters may consist of (a) the vertical silo-type, moving ground refuse from top to bottom in its various stages of reduction and decomposition; (b) the. .Ynrizontal screw-type composter which agitates the ground refuse, moving it slowly from the entrance end to the opposite end for discharge; (c) the horizontal drum-type composter consisting of a rotating steel cylinder, set with a slope of about 50 from horizontal, -17- in which the material is moved from.entrance end to opposite end by continual rotation of the drum and which is typified by the "Dano" process. In each of these cases, two or three days is required for effective stabilization. Plants of this type are relatively compact and may be located without offense in any industrial area. The end product is pathogen free, vermin-free and odorless. In Professor John Nesbitt's recent report for Pennsylvania State University, he estimates the American cost of a Danish "Dano" operation at $2. 88 per ton of refuse composted, based on an equipment outlay of $225, 000 for a plant of 50 ton per day capacity. The Rawn re- port estimates a construction cost equivalent to only $150, OOO.for me- chanical plants of this size in general, but still comes up with a com- posting cost of almost $8. 00 per ton. Evidently other mechanized digestion processes are even more expensive. University of California's Bulletin No. 1 estimates the cost of a Frazer silo-type operation serving . 50, 000 as high as $19. 00 per ton. Apparently the estimator is confronted with a wide range from which to choose. However, a recent visit to the Dano operation in Sacramento did provide a minimum of information upon which it might be possible to base an estimate. Plants located in approximate conformance with Exhibit C would have a delivery of '700 tons a day of which about 460 tons would be compostable. This would require a plant almost five times the . size of the one in Sacramento but operating at full capacity could perform at a cost of about $2.80 per ton. Since loss in weight after composting may be as much as 501o, revenues derived from the sale of the finished product at a price of about $6. 00 per ton would cover the cost of the composting ' process. However, it is likely that the cost of marketing would equal the -18- - cost of composting, .bringing the price of the finished packaged product to about $12.00 per ton. Although the end product does con- tain certain nutritive ingredients, it is doubtful that they are suf- ficient to classify i.t as a fertilizer. Its most valuable asset is its moisture retaining properties which should make it an excellent soil conditioner or manure mix. It is therefore likely that it would be in competition with products like peat, which, it may be pointed out, can. be purchased delivered in bulk at a cost of $5. 00 per ton. At the present time, there has been little success in attempts to market the finished product in the United States. In fact, the most recent word is that appearing in the February '1959 News Letter of the APWA advising that the well-known 140-ton per day McKeesport, Penn(.ylvania composting plant, built at a cost of $350, 000, is still idle due to financial problems resulting from marketing difficulties. U. S. Department of Agriculture figures show a total consumption of natural organic fertilizers of all kinds of about 460, 000 tons per year. Even assuming that this figure were doubled by "Situation 2000, " Orange County alone could provide almost 6016 of the national demand. This would undoubtedly result in saturation of the market to the point, where it would probably be difficult to give the product away free of \ charge. In this case, the County would once again have to face the prob- lem of ultimate disposal with the major accomplishment of the composting process having been a 5016 to 8016 reduction in bulk. The process of composting also has disadvantages similar to those mentioned for incineration in that non-compostable. materials must be segregated either for salvage or further disposal. Bulletin No. 9 of the -19- U. C. , S. E. R. P. reports over 33% of municipal refuse collected in Berkeley consisted of non-compostables and this may be considered a representative example. Because of new trends in packaging, paper content of refuse is increasing and some of this must also be removed to maintain the carbon-nitrogen level at the desirable 30:1 or 35:1 ratio. Furthermore, no provision is made for the disposal of inorganic in- dustrial wastes. Ocean Disposal Whenever the subject of refuse disposal is discussed, the un- suspecting layman- is bound to refer to the seemingly unlimited .potential of the great expanse of ocean so conveniently located along Orange County's southwesterly flank.' The most accessible portion of this vast medium, however, is the least cooperative; and since more than 8516 of regular household and commercial refuse has a specific gravity less than that of water, the ocean can be quite effective in its .efforts to return its un- wanted charge to the land from which it came. The most notable example of ocean disposal, albeit a poor one, was set by the City of.New York between 1890 and the 19301s. Pollution of Jersey beaches finally created enough of an uproar to result in a United States Supreme. Court decision in 1934 putting an end to New York's ocean disposal activities: To those recent visitors to New York who may have seen refuse being loaded into barges on the East River, it may be pointed out that they were actually witnessing a transfer operation only, the refuse being towed to land disposal :sites in outlying sections of the city. -20- Similarly bitter experience was encountered in California by the City of Oakland. Dumping even as far as thirty miles at sea still resulted in dirty beaches and unpleasant relations with neigh- boring communities, until the City finally had to abandon the practice in 1942. The practice in this State still exists on a small scale, how-. ever, with private barges and tugs collecting refuse from'ships entering the ports of Los Angeles and San Francisco for disposal at sea without ill effect, although in quantities that seldom exceed thirty tons per week. But after Oakland's retirement from the field, no other California com- munity has attempted ocean disposal. Of course, this in itself is not sufficient reason to disqualify the method from consideration as a possible alternative for Orange County "Situation 2000", without an engineering estimate of the possible cost. And in such an estimate, the distance out to sea is a prime factor. Merely to comply with the minimum set by state law of twenty miles be- yond coastal lands (including San Clemente Island) would call for al- most ninety miles. However, under no circumstances could the County afford to risk pollution-of its shoreline recreational facilities, and it is felt that a distance much less than two hundred miles from shore could not be considered. As a thought toward reducing this distance, consideration might be given to the possibility of compacting the refuse into dense bales making it not only non-floatable but less space-demanding during transport. However, an analysis of a baling process now in operation in Orange County which seems to be typical shows a cost in excess of $1. 00 per ton. This would more than offset the savings which might accrue in the form of a shorter haul and smaller barges. -21- Another interesting idea which has been advanced is one which does not involve.a serious increase in unit costs - that of burning the refuse at sea and then dumping the non-floatable residue. In this situation, it is estimated that burning could take place between fifty and one hundred miles off shore without offending the APCD and the residue. discharged at about one hundred miles. We may then consider one of three identical situations in which the refuse delivery would be 1500 tons per calendar day (one-third of the County total "Situation 2000") and the one-way ocean haul would be one hundred miles. Although the expected daily delivery can con- ceivably be handled in two barges towed in tandem behind a single tug, the maximum speed of such a combination with a first class tug under ideal conditions would be under eight knots. Total trip time with al- lowance for dumping would exceed twenty-six hours; it would therefore be necessary to provide two additional barges at the loading pier while the other unit is at sea. In addition, a standby tug must"be considered essential in order to prevent a complete shutdown of operations during necessary repairs or maintenance. Considering amortization over a thirty-year period of the capital investment in four barges, two tugs and loading pier, labor in the form of crew and pier help, loading equipment, tug operating costs and a very appreciable item, marine insurance, an approximate operating cost of $1. 75 per ton can be estimated. Of course, fixed costs are very high in this operation and the .unit cost per ton would show a severe increase for deliveries much -22- less than the 1500 tons assumed in this case. For example, the Rawn report estimates a cost of $2.80 per ton for deliveries around 500 tons per day, with the ocean haul only fifty miles each way. Neither of these estimates takes into account the necessity of pro- viding standby barges of some unknown capacity for storage purposes in the event weather conditions prevent sea-going operations. Another dis- advantage is the fact that unloading points for collection vehicles are necessarily restricted to the coastline, adding an extra cost- for the long haul or transfer from outlying collection areas. Furthermore, establish- ment of refuse handling facilities anywhere along the County's coastline would undoubtedly meet with public disfavor. With no industrial zoning available the creation of a variant use would be difficult if not impossible.. Probably of greater significance is the fact that a refuse disposal system in a highly developed metropolitan county must operate with the dependability of any public utility. Anyone familiar with marine operations will recognize that the vagaries of weather and sea are not generally con- ducive to the high degree of reliable performance which must be provided. Grinding Refuse to Sewers Most home owners are familiar with home grinding as a sanitary method of garbage disposal, and many communities in the United States have even gone so far as to make the installation of garbage grinders mandatory in all new residential construction. In Orange County, the City of La Habra has adopted such an ordinance and the City of Anaheim is now preparing one. But even in the absence of legislation, builders have recognized the simplicity, sanitation and convenience offered by the home grinder and, catering to the demands of the housewife, have made it almost universal practice to install -23- the device in new homes and apartments. Industry sources estimate that close to one million units have been installed in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, which includes Orange County, in the last ten years; and the rate of new and replacement installations now exceeds 200, 000 per year.. Authorities agree that the per capita rate of garbage production varies between 0. 6 and 0. 7 pounds per day. The U. S. Public Health Se rvice in its 1953 bulletin "Sanitary Refuse Practice" reports a- figure of 0. 6 .pounds. Rawn estimates 0. 67 pounds for the Los Angeles area, and the 1954-55 Annual Report of Los Angeles City Bureau of Sanitation indicates a figure of 0. 65 pounds. Substantial agreement is found in a check of garbage quantities collected in older sections of three Orange County cities where home grinders are not in use which indicates a daily per capita production varying from 0. 62 to 0.72 pounds. If 0. 7 pounds is accepted as a fair approximation, the County's , present production may be estimated at 235 tons of garbage per day. However, collectors in seven selected Orange County cities report gar- bage collected at the rate'of only 0.3 pounds per capita per day, which compares closely with the. trend reported by Ralph Black in California Vector Views, January 1957, for four Southern California cities in other counties. At this rate, approximately 100 tons of garbage is collected daily in Orange County. The remaining quantity, or approximately 135 tons per day, is entering the sewerage system via the garbage grinder and is evidently re- sulting in a change in the character of the sewage itself. American City magazine recently reported the findings of an investigation conducted by -24- by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts to determine the in- crease in strength of household sewage after the installation of garbage grinders, as follows: Constituent Daily per Capita Increase % Increase Suspended solids (lbs. ) 0. 04 to 0. 05 36 to 45 Biochemical oxygen de- mand total (lbs.) 0. 05 to 0. 06 50 to 60 Grease (lbs. ) 0. 01 to 0. 03 50 to 150 Sewage flow (gals. ) 1 to 2 2. 3 to 4. 5 The most notable effect has been a revision of sewerage maintenance procedures in order to contend with grease accumulations in gas traps and pump impellers. By "Situation 2000" it is estimated that the County's total daily gar- bage production will be about 1000 tons of which probably less than 140 tons will be set out for collection, the remainder entering the sewerage system via home and restaurant grinders. This is based on the assumption that 9516 of the future increase in population will. be served by home grinders, a con- tinuation of the present practice reported by building departments throughout the County. It is conceivable that even the 140 tons collected could be de- posited into the sewerage system by way of central garbage grinding stations. With all the County's garbage going into the sewerage system, the influent at the plant, diluted by combination with sewage from other sources in the County, should show increases in strength approximately one-�half that indicated in the table above for residential sewage only. According to the Rawn report, the effect of community-wide grinding on Los Angeles County's primary treatment works would be about $0. 56 per ton of garbage ground to cover the cost of added personnel and facilities of increased -25- capacity. It may be estimated that plants with secondary treatment pro- cesses would face an increased cost of about $1. 00 per ton. Rawn also estimates the cost of operating and amortizing a central grinding system at about $1. 46 per ton. This brings the total cost of a central garbage grinding operation to between $2. 02 and $2. 46 per ton. Since it has been previously stated that refuse production in "Situation 2000" is expected to be 4500 tons per day, the foregoing dis- cussion regarding the disposal of 140 tons of garbage involves only 3. 116 of the total problem. Therefore, if grinding is to warrant real consideration as a method of refuse disposal, it must be in the broader view which would include combustible trash as well as garbage. This is a field in which experience is negligible, although the idea is certainly feasible. Of course, the most significant effect on-sewage character would be a tremendous increase in solids. According to Rawn, additional facilities for the removal and treatment of this increased com- ponent would require a capital outlay of about $5, 600 per ton of refuse ground per day. Amortizing this figure at 4-1/2% over a 20 year period results in a unit cost of $1. 18 per ton. Add to this the $1. 46 for operating and amor- tizing the grinding facilities, basically similar to those for garbage grinding, and the total cost becomes $2. 64 per ton. This figure does not appear un- reasonable and grinding stations do offer the advantage of strategic location to' eliminate the cost of the long haul. However, the disadvantage of having to provide additional facilities for the disposal of non-grindable refuse, ap- proximately 30% of the total, still. remains. As for grinding equipment and operations, there is still much that is unknown and it is felt that considerable study and research into this phase is necessary before the metropolitan county could consider refuse grinding as a dependable method of disposal. -26- Hog Feeding With all due respect to the porcine population, it must be ob- vious that swine feeding as a method of refuse disposal hardly deserves more than passing mention in this report. First of all, the extreme diffi- culty of operating hog ranches free from nuisance and sanitation hazard ,. makes them a most unwelcome part of the scene of Orange County "Situation 2000. " And in the second place, since it is garbage alone which may be disposed of in this manner, the problem of disposing of the remaining 9710 of the County's refuse production remains unsolved. The fact is that swine feeding as an effective method of garbage disposal is diminishing in the County even now, although it is presently the only means available for disposal of the County's 100 tons of garbage per day not being ground into the sewerage system. The practice of feeding garbage to hogs goes well back into County history, but there have been at least two recent causes of a significant increase in cost: (1) The County's rapidly advancing development, which is either forcing the abandonment of hog ranches or pushing them out into distant, sparsely inhabited areas (2) The rise in. 1952 of a new swine disease (Vesicular Exanthema) caused by the feeding of raw garbage to swine, which resulted in the adoption of regulations requiring pre-cooking. The first, by increasing the haul, adds to a collection cost already high because of separate collection of garbage and trash. The second, al- though partially offset by an increase in hog weight, has substantially added to feeding costs. Therefore, ,communities which at one time had been able to derive an income from the sale of garbage are now beginning to find them- selves hard-pressed to collect and dispose of the material economically. Nevertheless, from a strict dollars and cents viewpoint, it must be admitted that garbage is a highly salvable material, and the cost of the -27- disposal operation itself can be compensated for by value realized in pork. However, since garbage itself is expected to be an ever-decreasing component of overall refuse production, it seems more appropriate for the metropolitan county to adopt a system of disposal which will be more inclusive and offer f ewer aesthetic and sanitary problems. Sanitary Landfill The practice of refuse disposal on land may be traced back to the first prehistoric man who tossed his unwanted scraps out the most con- venient opening of his cave. . From that early day the practice of land •dis- posal progressed to the time when more civilized man recognized that at least a minimum of sanitation demanded the confinement of refuse to cer- tain specific areas - dumps. The next step ,was the application of certain controls at the disposal site either in the form .of occasional or continual burning in order to reduce bulk and discourage vermin, or perhaps even periodic application of dirt cover. And finally, as a direct descendant in this lineage comes the most recent innovation - the sanitary landfill. The latter phases of this evolutionary process have been evident in Orange County from indiscriminate dumping on roadsides, under bridges and other public rights of way, to sites specifically designated for disposal with a minimum control to the modern sanitary landfill methods practiced today. Therefore, of all the methods of refuse disposal which may conceivably be considered as suitable for the Orange County of "Situation 2000", it is only with the sanitary landfill that the County has had any first-hand experience. The "Manual of Practice on .Sanitary Landfill11 of the American Society of Civil Engineers defines the sanitary landfill as the "method of disposing of refuse on land without creating nuisances or hazards to public health or safety, -28- • by utilizing the principals of engineering to confine the refuse to the smallest practical area, to reduce it to the smallest practical volume, and to cover it with a layer of earth at the conclusion of each day's operation or at such intervals as may be necessary. " Since landfill construction obviously results in an increase in elevation, a basically suitable landfill disposal site is one which is lower than adjacent lands, and which can be raised in grade without damaging effect to these adjacent lands. These low lands may be of natural formation, such as marshes, canyons and tidal lands; or man- made, such as abandoned sand pits, quarries and mines. The unavail- ability of such formations or excavations does not necessarily preclude adoption of the sanitary landfill inasmuch as trench or area operations on level or rolling ground are well known where open land is plentiful and communities are widely separated. It is felt, however, that in the Orange County of "Situation 2000" this type of land will be at a premium. Further- more, as previously reported, it has become obvious that man-made ex- cavations can no longer be depended upon to meet the needs of a long term landfill disposal program. It would therefore seem that if the sanitary landfill is to warrant consideration as a part of Orange County's Master Plan of Refuse Disposal, it will have to be in the form of the canyon operation. In order to qualify as a part of the County's future disposal system, a-canyon must have certain desirable qualities. (1) The drainage situation should permit the construction of a fill without the 'hazards of diversion, damming or erosion. (2) Groundwater conditions should be free of the danger of pollution. (3) Cover material should exist in sufficient quantity to. meet opera- tional needs and be of a type that may be excavated by regular earthmoving equipment. -29- (4) The site should have a capacity which, depending upon the anticipated delivery, will offer a life expectancy justifying the cost of initial improvements. (5) The location should be within reasonable distance of existing roads so that the cost of construction of access facilities may be kept within justifiable bounds. (6) The site, in its finished state, should lend itself to some use- ful purpose as a reclaimed piece of land. Orange County is bounded on its northerly, easterly and southerly sides with foothill terrain containing many canyons with the necessary qualifications. And although the County has a potential population of three million, it is geographically compact within its 800 square miles, placing a majority of the County's future population within reasonable haul distance of these canyon sites. These facilities could be approximately located as shown on the attached Exhibit G. Essentially, operations at a landfill consist of spreading and com- pacting the trash and applying a dirt cover at appropriate intervals. This work is perform ed by ordinary earthmoving equipment, such as tractors and carryall scrapers, although certain adaptations and accessories have been made to the former to make them more suitable for disposal work. The cost of operating the County's existing landfill program is ap- proximately $1. 25 per ton, on the basis of the present County trash production of approximately 1, 000 tons per day delivered to seven scattered landfill sites throughout the County. This figure is.high when compared to costs ex- perienced by communities like Glendale or Burbank, for example, where operations are confined to a single site and equipment can be put to its -30- �� � � � ,►'..may p,,..► 'OAVn r� tr' w �><��� 0 19 `\. Alp ��4 TeeupZR d vL �1��!-� �iil����•c��" �.1' S /.},�(�. �j� �,I 1 N i. � :•tRr',YI�Y � � 'I► _a�Pf� � . PPS a 1 ' INA r " rr`r.�l v' 'V• ow,aw,di: s+ � a r1 sW ;'}' e�" ,� bar � �jl �e K e[ y " ,• �` � . • Syr a•, ° wi I ��e - w ��rl �l1 Mon ISP �►Cr1IM � 6 �1 UiVAN F' ( a7f aME WINMR1 l MAN u� r a e M �° < �`�A�� � gala• I , F most economical use. It will be shown that in the Orange County of "Situation 2000" with the refuse production multiplied 4-1 /2 times and the number of sites reduced to five, the unit disposal cost can actually be reduced to about $0. 47 per ton, including equipment amortization. Such a dramatic reduction in cost does not seem improbable when one realizes that a tractor of the D7 or TD 18 class can ade- quately dispose of over three hundred tons of refuse per day, not in- cluding assistance from additional earthmoving equipment. The calen- dar daily refuse production in "Situation 2000" has been noted as 4500 tons. Assuming the continuation of a 6-day per week collection, the amount actually delivered for disposal would be: 4500 x 6 = 5200 tons per day, indicating an approximate need of seventeen tractors for refuse handling. It can also be shown that seven earthmoving tractors would adequately meet the cover requirements for the five landfill sites. With two units in reserve, the total equipment need would come to 26 units, compared to the present Disposal Division complement of seventeen tractors. The result then is an increase in equipment complement of 5316 for a 450% increase in refuse production, and the primary reason for the substantial reduction in unit cost which may be anticipated becomes obvious. In addition, the overall cost of a landfill program must include amortization of the cost and maintenance of initial improvement plus amor- tization of the cost of original land acquisition. This additional cost calcu- lated over a period of 30 years at 4-1/2% interest comes to about $0. 08 per ton for a five site operation, bringing the overall cost of the future land- fill program to about $0. 55 per ton. -31- However, in order to maintain a fair comparison between the sanitary landfill and the other methods of disposal previously discussed, the cost of haul, which is not inconsiderable, must be recognized. It was noted that installations such as incinerators, composting stations and central grinding stations have the advantage of convenient location, while the canyon landfill must depend upon the endowments afforded by nature. It was also noted that Orange County is fortunate in that the majority of its population can be served within a reasonable haul distance. However, a sizable portion of the County's future population, located in the long-haul zone shown on Exhibit G, will be faced with an excessive haul and the cost of this haul over that which might normally be expected in the case of other me thuds of disposal should rightfully be charged to the cost of the landfill system. The haul from point of collection to point of disposal is effected in two general ways: (1) By the individual householder (2) By contracted, franchised or city-operated trash truck. Based simply upon automobile operating costs and without considering time expended the cost to the average individual who hauls his family's trash to the disposal site once per week may be estimated at approximately $1. 30 per ton per mile of haul. Since the present average cost of pick-up service in the County is $15. 00 per year or approximately $0.29 per week, it may be shown that the householder who lives less than three miles from the disposal site can actually save money if he chooses to haul his own trash. Of course, a large portion of the population resides in cities and sanitary districts which provide pick-up service with tax funds, and for these people the choice does not exist. However, it is obvious that even the citizen with the choice con- �fl-ders the convenience and time-saving offered by the service as well worth -32- the expense; for an estimate of the refuse delivered daily to the County's disposal sites via trash truck indicates that over 9510 of the population is served in this manner. And indeed this practice is to be encouraged. It is extremely doubtful that any system of disposal facilities could adequately handle the tremendous influx of small vehicles which would be created if individual trash hauling were to become a general practice. Of greater interest here, therefore, is the cost of hauling refuse by trash truck and this may be estimated with the following assumptions: 1. Truck operating cost = $4. 00/hour 2. . Labor = $2. 00/hour 3. Average speed from point of collection to point of disposal = 20 mph i 4. Average truck load = 3-1/2 tons Total cost per mile: Truck 4. 00 = 20� 20 MPH 0 2 Laborers 2x2. 00 = 20� �H TOTAL = 40� / mile Cost per ton per mile = 40� / 3. 5 = 11. 4� Exhibit G shows that the average haul from the center of the long-haul zone to the nearest disposal site is approximately twelve and one-half miles. A substitute facility, such as an incinerator, located in an industrial area near the center of this zone would reduce the haul to approximately five miles. The average round trip overhaul may thus be estimated at fifteen miles and the cost of this overhaul would approximate 11. 4 x 15 or $1. 71 per ton. A disposal system, therefore, consisting only of landfill sites as in- dicated on Exhibit G would involve a cost of $0. 55 per ton for disposal plus -33- $1.71 for overhaul or a total cost of $2. 26 for approximately one-third of the three million population estimated for Orange County "Situation.2000. The average cost for the County as a whole may be calculated: (2x0. 55 + 2. 26) / 3 = $1. 12per ton In Summary The table on the following page. briefly summarizes,and compares the elements of the foregoing discussion of the various methods of refuse disposal. The figures shown are based on today's dollars with refuse pro- duction at its assumed peak of 4500 tons per day in "Situation 2000. °0 From the viewpoint of economy and practicability, the sanitary land- fill provides the answer for Orange County's "Situation 2000. " Adoption of this method as the long range solution of the County's refuse disposal prob- lem offers the following additional advantages: (1) The County is already in the landfill business and is operating three long term sites, two of which with future expansion, may fit very well into a master plan. (2) Unlike other methods, the landfill offers facilities for disposal of practically all types of refuse with the pos- sible exception of liquid or soluble industrial wastes which may still require special handling to avoid the possibilities of underground water pollution.. (3) The increase in value of properties reclaimed by landfill will more than offset the cost of original land acquisition and provide sites for future recreational and park areas needed in the County. -34- COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF VARIOUS DISPOSAL METHODS Cost / Ton of Mtce. , Oper. and Method of Disposal Amortization Disadvantages Advantages 1. Incineration 3. 17 - $ 4.78 1. Air pollution hazard 1. Convenience of location 2_ Added cost of disposal'of residue and non-combustible wastes. 2. Mechanical Composting $ 2. 80 1. Added cost of disposal of 1. Sale of end-product at non-compostable wastes profit claimed but not proved. 2. Convenience of location 3. Ocean Disposal $ 1.75 1. Added extrahaul cost for 3/4 of the population 2. Risk of coastline pollution. and contrary to existing zoning. 3. Added cost of stand-by facilities 4. Grinding to Sewers 2. 64 1. Equipment stH1 not a e- Convenience of locFt-Ron quately developed. 2. Added cost of disposal of non-grindable s. 5. Hog Feeding. Net profit due to 1. Sanitation and aesthetic 1. Inexpensive value received in problems. pork 2. Accounts for only 3% of refuse collected. 6. Sanitary Landfill $0. 55 + Extra-haul 1. Added cost of extra-haul 1. Will handle_all.types of of $1. 71/ton for 1/3 ulti- solid refuse. mate population brings 2. Will reclaim worthless average overall costs to canyons for recreational $1. 12/ton. or other light use. =35- However, what about the intermediate period when landfill unit costs will be higher for two reasons: (1) The fixed costs of amortization, overhead and minimum equipment complement will be divided by a lesser delivery. (2) A larger proportion of the County's population will be located in the long-haul zone. A brief review of an intermediate situation, say 1980, therefore seems justified; and good use may be made of the figures provided by the Stanford Research Institute Report to the Orange County Board of Super- visors, 1959. This report predicts a 1980 population of 2-1/2 million. It also indicates that the long-haul zone will contain a population of 970, 000. Estimates on this basis show operating costs of $0. 54 per ton. Amortization and other fixed costs come to $0. 09, and the overhaul cost of $1. 71 is charged to 39% of the population. The average .cost for the County as a whole may be calculated: 617o x 0. 63 + 39% x 2. 34 = $1. 30 per ton . The figures for 1980 are not of sufficient significance to alter the conclusions previously expressed; but since an increase in cost is indicated, let us go one step further and estimate the situation for the more immediate future - 1965. Here the SRI. report indicates a County population of 1; 150, 000 with approximately 482, 000 or 4216 living in the long-haul area. On this basis, operating costs rise to $0. 71 per ton, and amortization and other fixed costs to $0. 20. The average overall cost to the County then comes to: 5816 x . 91 + 4210 x 2. 62 = $1. 63 per ton The following conclusions may therefore be drawn: (1) The majority of the County's population lying within reasonable haul distance of a landfill disposal system as shown in Exhibit G can be served ' at a unit cost that cannot be approached by any other method of disposal. -36 (2) This majority will increase from 5816 to a peak of 6710 of the County's population between 1965 and the assumed year of maximum density, 2000. (3) The cost of disposal for this majority will decrease from $0. 91 to $0.55 per ton over this Period of time. (4) A large minority of the population located in the northwestern section of the County will face overhaul costs averaging. $1. 71 per ton. (5) This minority will decrease from 4276 to 3316. (6) The combined cost of disposal plus overhaul for this minority will decrease from $2. 62 to $2. 26 per ton. (7) The average overall cost to the County will decrease from $1. 63 to $1. 12 per ton. (8) Even at the higher rate for the intermediate period, there is currently no known feasible alternate method of disposal which is economi- cally competitive. Since the long-haul zone will be faced with the highest costs, it is conceivable that a more economical alternative may yet be presented for this area. Incineration appears to be the most likely competitor subject to elimination of the air pollution hazard. However, even for the long-haul zone, some reduction in cost is possible within the framework of a landfill system. This is the subject of the following section. VI. THE ECONOMICS OF TRANSFER Justifying Adoption of a Transfer Plan It has been shown that the average cost of transporting refuse by the ordinary pick-up service truck from the northwest area to the nearest landfill -37- site may be estimated at 11. 4� per .ton-mile. It will be remembered . that this fairly high cost is based on labor involving two men and a truck carrying an average net weight of 3-1/2 tons. (Trucks of up to six tons capacity are in use; however, consequent savings are sub- stantially offset by an increase in operating costs. ) If the number of personnel can be reduced by one-half and if haul can be effected in vehicles of optimum. design carrying maximum legal weights, it is evident that transportation costs can be significantly reduced. This, of course, is the theory behind the transfer station. Centrally located in the pick-up service area it becomes the actual point of disposal for the. regular collection truck, saving 11. 4¢ per ton for every mile of reduced haul. Here the load is dumped directly into a waiting transfer vehicle capable of carrying a legal load of 22 tons or approximately the capacity of six average collection trucks. When this transfer vehicle is loaded, one man makes the trip to the final . disposal site. The unit cost of this trip may be estimated as follows: Assume a single transfer station located in the approximate center of the long-haul zone. (See Exhibit G) Distance to disposal site = 12-1/2 miles Average speed = 20 mph Driver's wage = $3. 00/hr. Cost of operating, maintaining and amortizing the transfer vehicle based on information received from Los Angeles County.for similar equip- ment = $0. 41 / mile -38- Equipment 2 x 0. 41 x 12. 5 = $10. 30 Labor Travel time $3. 00 x 2 x 12. 5/20 = 3. 75 Unloading time $3. 00 x 0. 5 = 1. 50 Tractor switching time $3. 00 x 0. 25 = 0. 75 Total Cost = $16. 30 Haul cost per ton (Ct) $16. 30/22=$0. 74, or 3� per ton-mile based on the 25 mile round trip. To the $0. 74 must be added the cost of operating, maintaining and amortizing the transfer station and its appurtenant facilities. This station cost (Cs) depends upon the design and the labor and equipment complement needed to handle the anticipated refuse delivery within the long-haul zone. Estimates based on a design to meet the ultimate needs of "Situation 2000" show an approximate cost of $0. 26 per ton. Estimated station costs for an operation in the more immediate future of the year 1965 are about the same at $0. 25 per ton. This similarity is not unexpected since in both cases the facilities provided are assumed to be working at full capacity. Greater unit costs should occur during periods of less than capacity operation because of certain fixed items, such as land and construction of basic facilities. For example, the estimated annual cost in 1965 of operating, maintaining and amortizing a station to handle 840 tons per day, six days per week, is approximately $66, 000. When delivery begins to exceed this tonnage by say 100 tons; construction of a new facility becomes necessary. This division would tend to reduce the delivery equally between the stations to approximately 470 tons per day each. The annual cost of operating each station to handle this volume is estimated at about $44, 000, a unit cost of -39- $0. 30 per ton. Of course as delivery begins to mount, the unit cost will once again drop toward the $0. 25 per ton figure. To summarize the aforementioned data, it may be stated that the cost (Cs) of operating centrally located transfer facilities in the long-haul zone, should come to between $0. 25 and $0. 30 per ton. The cost (Ct) of mass transportation to the disposal site should be about $0.74 per ton assuming a 25 mile round trip from point of transfer to point of disposal. The total cost (Cst) of such a transfer system should therefore be somewhere between $0. 99 and $1. 04 per ton. Inasmuch as the establishment of transfer facilities at or near the center of the long-haul zone .would decrease the regular collection truck haul by 15 miles at 11. 4� per ton-mile, the resultant saving of $1. 71 per _ ton more than justifies the adoption of the transfer method as part of the overall landfill disposal program. Determining the Extent of the Transfer System Once it has been decided to apply the principles of tranfer to the long-haul zone, additional analysis then becomes necessary to determine the most economical number and location of transfer stations within this zone to meet the ultimate requirements of "Situation 2000. " The questions to answer are: (1) Will it be cheaper to serve the long-haul zone with one large central station or several evenly distributed smaller stations? (2) If more than one, what number will be the optimum ? Obviously, a system of several small sites involves a larger capital outlay than a single large site because of the multiplication of certain basic features necessary. to each, such as the land parcels themselves as well as buildings, scales and ramps. And, as was previously noted, these fixed -40- �■■i , i� �R'4� �, �rE•.y,�:L"!e.y ■ SIR t -Ilw'.f ■ ,9~ 3' I .rk �sFYI �'+' �1• NN •�r,p�Jf� f�l�ww I w�il� il''pr�ifR �' � 4���'" ag"' �i a�+,�.p~ � IT OEM ii► ��ro69O�R �i ,A , Sh wrraw .z �x ■ spy 0 t•-+r �! kp•�ua,�,ry�p� " �a*�r` '�`ah„ �aQ*�rA� 1 �`i�"r�f"tNNOT i��IT16����I �• � ` M.. �< o SIR imilit slim 'C'+�r1�gn�I�$1_, ��C'Q�,r_i�jrf�ai=�I�w���:=����^f"e� ��� j���Q�'_`• 7 I7- OF ',� . �'..i: 0 } �. a �y. a��?1 COMPARATIVE TRANSFER COSTS - "Situation 2000" No. of 6-Day Ave. Radius Cost of Internal Cost of External Transfer Delivery, Each of Collection Haul (Within Col- Cost of Station Haul (Trans. Sta. Stations Tons Zone, Miles lection Zone) Ch, -Operation, Cs, to Disp. Sta. ) Ct Cst = Ch + Cst $ / Ton $ / Ton $ / Ton Cs + Ct $ / Ton 1. 1750 8. 0 - 1. 10 0. 26 0. 74 1. 00 2. 10 2. 875 5. 25 0. 72 0.26 0. 67 0. 93 1. 65 3. 583 4. 0 0. 55 0. 27 0. 70 0. 97 1. 52 4. 438 3. 3 0. 45 0. 31 0. 67 0. 98 1. 43 6. 292 3. 0 0. 41 0. 43 0. 73 1 . 16 1. 57 8. 219 2. 4 0. 33 0. 57 0. 69 1.26 1. 59 -40a - costs when applied to the lesser delivery to be expected at each site will contribute to higher unit costs (Cs) and consequently a higher -overall transfer cost (Cst). However, ,the advantage of a multiple system lies in the reduction of interior haul costs (Ch) within the collection zone, at the rate of 11. 4� per ton-mile for the individual trash truck. The number of stations that produces a minimum toal Cst + Ch should therefore present the optimum condition. For example, it was already stated that for 01Situation 2000" the cost of the transfer operation (Cst) with a large single facility in the center of the collection zone comes to $1. 00 per ton. Since the zone has an average radius of eight miles, it can be shown that the average length of interior haul = 0. 6R or 4. 8 miles. Therefore Ch for the round trip = 11. 4 x 9. 6 or $1. 10 per ton and Cst + Ch = $2.10 pe r ton. + Subsequent studies may then be made for 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 sites within the zone with the following tabulated results. Two of these al- ternate, situations are illustrated in Exhibits H and I. The following conclusions may be derived from a study of this table: (1) As was expected, the unit station cost (Cs) increases as the delivery decreases because of the effect of certain constant expenditures. (2) The external haul cost (Ct) remains fairly steady. This may also be expected, because in sub-dividing the long-haul zone the -41- greater distance to the outlying stations is offset by the shorter distance to the near stations. The average Ct of the multiple system is actually less than that of the central single system.be- cause a choice of disposal sites, A and D, is available, providing a short external haul from both the northerly and southeasterly sections of the long-haul zone. (3) At :$0. 93 per ton, the two-station system provides the lowest unit cost (Cst) for the system itself. As noted above, this is due to the fact that the two disposal sites, available in different directions, keep the external haul cost (Ct) at a minimum. (4) The four-station system provides the most economical overall condition with a minimum total Ch ¢ Cst of $1. 43 per ton. In Summary It is obvious that the entire pro-transfer argument is founded on a comparison of haul costs. To whatever extent the costs of overhaul for the individual collection truck can be reduced at 11. 4� per ton per mile, this saving can be applied to an economical transfer system. However, if, as assumed, the transfer system is organized as part of a County-operated disposal system, one's first impression might be that the saving is not de- posited in the same account from which the expenditures are drawn, inasmuch as the former goes to the collector and the latter comes out of the County -42- I i rz� r.�>srrrrras �. � .moo � ''" •. � �•awo�� ►���, � ;11. � , I� _ ; logs ! , � �d�� Mir:7i6e6tl �C t•�i�. ' ,• k am MEMO, GOO 1i7.11►i � ��t� °ar ��/�✓ R }N,is�k ra�gR�a :. RUA-54of AN 0 'A 19 N� al �POWMoir :,��.� ��� � � • - logs I '•. ��•ti1D , �. �1■�yr a J° �i"rN_'�� ���� ��s�• ;'ppp �1 `fie ° W4 �IIPI ° II r y �N �F• ,w � �gq�s`�O�q� ,a i tax fund. Only a bit more than the most superficial observation makes it apparent that the ultimate payor or beneficiary in both cases is the public itself. If this viewpoint is accepted, the final segment of the Master Plan falls into place presenting an overall picture of five disposal sites and four transfer stations with approximate locations as shown on Exhibit J. VII. THE MASTER PLAN - REVIEW OF UNIT COSTS Exhibit J, therefore, is an approximate, although entirely feasible, representation of the Master Plan of refuse disposal facilities which will most economically meet the County's ultimate need at the time that it reaches a condition of population saturation. It is approximate only to the extent that the location of each of the facilities cannot be precisely pinpointed. This must await formal acceptance of the proposal, -followed by intensive investigation in each area as the need arises. The following is a list of these facilities: Disposal Stations A. Brea Hills area B. Santa Ana Canyon area C. Santiago Hills area D. San Joaquin Hills area E. Capistrano area It is not entirely by accident that stations at-A, D and E are already in existence. These are fairly long-lived sites although it is expected that each will require replacement or enlargement prior to "Situation 2000. " Nevertheless, they significantly establish in the public's mind the suitability of these areas for disposal facilities. Transfer Stations 1. Huntington Beach area - 2. Garden Grove area 3. Stanton area 4. Southwest Fullerton area -43- AM. IN "Alm'asE�o� M , V •,v • � , gA� • ;r Ago T i . OEM -1 our I.i �'+'"��Z■i.� i °''. ������ �,6�rrba� 1p �,j ��pp I H .c� YSlllt�.i�11■��" .�I. ti a R Ir, �i _ y<� � �.� �I� ��P 11f��'i�:�►��rig►i�.9°a`r�f?�"'��:a4��s a � ,y>�, '_.. ,; ���r4:C�C■Cq�r:���(T.C�Q■?�'����a�.t�°�fi=1 ���r.plp�,�,�eeA�=-J, ���',�� ».,., -®i!.'�n�1.5���y�t��'ii .�*"�i��`���i�9/���1ai16� ti■t9fliI��"'' ' ^"��` y f CC .M � ���+h I h��i" Oi•�v V I 9.4114 nano W MA o I * c. IBM ■rrrr LrI own ttfm airy I , ice 00 I� �t� :IFS, � '•, �;, .- � I, �� � �( �G � ��. '�����ey��w The County already owns property in Areas 1 and 3, the former a land- fill site at Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue which is nearing capacity, and the latter an abandoned burning dump site at Knott Avenue and Katella Avenue. It is conceivable that both of these could be converted to transfer station use. In previous sections of this report, various and sundry figures have been given on unit costs for some of the many different situations that could face the County, depending upon its choice and design of a refuse disposal system. Now that the report has produced a feasible and more specific plan, it would seem appropriate to review in greater detail the costs that may be anticipated. Disposal Stations - Operating Costs Take, for example, the service area of Site A as shown on Exhibit J. An analysis of the best figures available on the distribution of population, including those provided by the County Planning Commission and the Stanford Research Institute Report, indicates the peak population of this area to be about 375, 000. In addition, Site A will serve as the point of disposal for transfer stations 3 and 4 to which the refuse from approximately half the population of the long-haul zone will have been delivered.. Since it may be recalled that the peak population of the long-haul zone was estimated at 1, 000, 000 the,total population to be served by Site A come to 875, 000. Using the 3 pounds per day per capita figure for refuse production, the 6 day per week daily delivery may be estimated: 875, 000 x 3 x 7 = 1500 tons per day 2, 000 x On the basis of present experience, the complement of labor and equip- ment which must be provided to efficiently dispose of this delivery may then be dei:ermined. -44- The same line of thought may be followed for Disposal Sites B through E and the results summarized as shown in the table on the following page. The tabulated totals lead to the following annual cost summary: Labor: 14 custodians = $89, 000 24 equipment operators = 1 79, 000 Overhead 169/6 x 268, 000 = 43, 000 $311, 000 Equipment: 24 tractors @ $5. 00* per hr 350, 000 7 carryalls @ $3. 80�per hr = 78, 000 $428, 000 (*This figure includes amortization and maintenance as well as operation) Miscellaneous:. Such as irregular equipment rental, transportation, etc. Estimate $5, 000 per station = 25, 000 Total annual operating cost = $764, 000 -Unit operating cost: $764, 000 x 2000 = $0. 47 per ton x 3 x -45- ULTIMATE LABOR AND EQUIPMENT COMPLEMENT Five Disposal Stations Pop. 6-Day Dirt Pop. Served Total Week Trash Moving Carry- Equip. Site Location Served By Pop. Daily Tractors Tractors alls Oper. Custodians Direct Transf ei Served Tonnage Needed Needed Needed Needed Needed A Brea Hills 375, 000 500; 000 875, 000 1500 5 2 2 7 4 B Santa Ana 350, 000 - 350, 000 600 2 1 1 3 2 Canyon C Santiago 380, 000 - 380, 000 700 2 1 1 3 2 Hills - D San Joaquin 600, 000 500, 000 1, 100, 000 1900 6 2 2 8 4 Hills E Capistrano 295, 000 - 2.95, 000 500 2 1 1 3. 2 TOTALS 2, 000, 000 1, 000, 000 3, 000, 000 5200 17 7 7 24 14 46 - Disposal Stations - Amortizationl, Maintenance and Other Costs Estimates may also be made of anticipated annual costs to cover amortization of capital investments and improvements, maintenance of facilities and utilities on the basis of a 30 year operation as follows: Land: 5 sites averaging 150 acres each at about $2500 per acre 5 x 150 x 2500 = $1, 875, 000 Annual cost of this expenditure at 4-1/2% _ $84, 400 Roads: 5 sites averaging 1-1 /2 miles each, at about $70, 000 each including R/W = $350, 000 Amortizing at 4-1/2%, 30 years 350, 000 x 0. 06139 = 21 500 Annual maintenance: $700/mile x 7-1/2 mile,s _ 5, 250 Buildings: 5 sites, $1000 each, a life of 10 years Amortizing at 4-1/2% = 630 Fencing: 5 sites, $3, 000 each, 30 year life Amortizing at 4-1/216 = 920 Utility Installations: 5 sites, $2000 each, 30 year life Amortizing at 4-1/210 = 620 Utility Services: 5 sites, $50 per month each 5 x 50 x 12 = 3, 000 Miscellaneous: 5 sites, $2, 500 each = 12, 500 Total annual amortization, 'etc. cost =$129, 320 Unit amortization, etc. cost 129, 000 x 2000 = $0.08 per ton T-000,000 x 3 x 365 -47- Transfer Stations - Station Opl-ration and Amortization Costs As previously stated, the ultimate population of the long-haul zone is estimated at 1, 000, 000 with an average daily refuse production, on the basis of a 6 day collection week, of 1750 tons. Assuming an equal distribution to each of the four transfer stations produces an estimated delivery of 438 tons per day per station. Considering an average 3-1/2 ton load per trash truck indicates traffic at 125 trucks per day. Con- struction cost of a transfer station to handle this volume, including un- loading ramp, retaining walls, paving, fencing, etc. is estimated at $80, 000. (A point of reference is;the $68, 000 spent for similar construc- tion by Los Angeles County about 4 years ago. ) In addition, the following typical appurtenant facilities should be provided: - a. Scale $9, 000 b. Unloading hoppers 5, 500 C. Building and utility installations 7, 500 d. Gas tank - compressor 2, 000 e. Miscellaneous equipment 1, 500 f. Landscaping 500 This brings the total capital outlay in the station and facilities to $106, 000.. The following summary of estimated annual costs may then be sub- mitted for each transfer station: Station and facilities: Amortize $106, 000 over 20 years 106, 000 x 0. 07688 = $8, 200 Land: Assume 5 acres at $15, 000 per acre = $75, 000 Annual cost @ 4-1/2 = 3, 400 Labor: 2 custodians (including a scaieman) $10, 500 1 loader-crane operator 6, 400 Overhead - 1676 of $16, 900 = 2, 700 19, 600 I -48- Equipment: Loader-packer crane @ $27. 00 per day = $8, 400 Maintenance, utilities, etc. = 1, 000 Standby equipment: 1/4 annual cost of extra transfer vehicle = 400 Total annual station cost = $ 41, 000 Unit station cost . _ $41, 000 438 x 6 x 52 $0. 31 per ton Transfer Stations - Transportation Costs A study of Exhibit J indicates that the distance between Transfer Station #1 and the nearest Disposal Station (D), is about 12-1/2 miles over existing public highways. (It will be noted that in previous discussions, the haul distance was taken as a theoretical straight line. This was considered adequate then, inasmuch as it was a comparison of relative results which was of interest. ) With a round trop of 25 miles the unit transportation cost from Station #1 may be estimated as follows: Total trip time: Travel @ 20 mph = 1. 25 hrs. Unloading at disposal site = 0.50 Tractor switching at transfer station = 0. 25 hrs. Total time = 2. 00 hrs. In an 8-hr. day each unit will i ake 4 trips carrying a total load of 4 x 22 = 88 tons Labor: 8 hrs. x $3. 00 per hour = $24 Equipment: Total equipment cost = 0. 41 per mile 4x25x0. 41 = 41 Total cost/day = $65 Unit transportation cost, Transfer $0.74 per ton Station #1 $65 = -49- The round trip distance from Station #2 over public roads is also 25 miles; so in the same way as above the unit transportation cost may be estimated as $0. 74 per ton. From Station #3, the round trip distance to and from Disposal Site A. is about 34 miles. Total trip.time: Travel @ 20 mph = 1. 75 hrs. Unloading - switching = 0. 75 hrs. Total time = 2. 45 hrs. In an 8-hr. day each unit will make only 3 trips carrying a total load of 3 x "22 = 66 tons Labor: 8 hrs: x $3. 00 per hr = $24 Equipment: 3 x 34 x 0. 41 = 42 Total cost/day = $66 Unit transportation cost, Transfer Station #3 = $66 = $ 1..00 per ton From Station #4, the round trip distance is about 20 miles: ' Total trip time: Travel @ 20 mph = 1 hr-: Unloading - switching = 0. 75 hrs. Total time = 1. 75 hrs. In an 8-hr. day each unit will make 4 trips for 88 tons Labor: 8 x $3. 00 _/ hr. _ $24 Equipment:. 4 x 20.x 0. 41. = 33 Total cost/day = $57 Unit transportation cost. Transfer Station #4 $ 57 $0. 65/ton The average unit transportation cost for all four transfer stations therefore comes to an estimated $0. 78 per ton. -50- In Summary 1. Five Disposal Stations a. Operating costs, including labor and amortization, operation and mainten- ance of equipment = $0.47 per ton b. Amortization of capital investment maintenance, land, etc. _ $0.08 Total unit disposal cost = $0.5 5 per ton 2. Four Transfer Stations a. Station operation and amortization costs = $0.31 per ton b. Transportation costs = 0.78 Total unit transfer cost = $1.09 per ton VIII. MASTER PLAN - TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT Disposal Stations It is anticipated that the total capital invested to establish and operate the 'five disposal ites will approximate the following: 1. Land 750 acres at $2500/acre $1, 875, 000 2. Improvements = Roads = $350, 000 Buildings = 5, 000 Fencing = 15, 000 Utility installations = 10, 000 380, 000 3. Equipment 24 tractors of D7 class = $700, 000 7 10-13 yd. carryalls = 85, 000 Misc. rooters,,trucks, etc 30, 000 2 standby tractors = 58, 000 1 standby carryall = 15, 000 888, 000 Capital investment, five disposal sites = $3, 143, 000 -51- Transfer Stations The following is the anticipated capital investment necessary for the establishment and operation of the four transfer stations: 1: Land 20 acres at $15, 000 / acre = $300, 000 2. Improvements Stations and facilities 4 x $106, 000 (see Section VII above) = 424, 000 3. . Equipment 4 loader-packer cranes @ $15, 000 = $60,000 Station #1: 5 truck tractor units @ $9000 = 45, 000 8 trailer combinations, each a set of doubles @ $11, 000 = 88, 000 Station #2 5 truck-tractors - 45, 000 8 trailer sets = 88, 000 Station #3: 7 truck-tractors = 63, 000 8 trailer sets = 88, 000 Station #4 5 truck-tractors = 45, 000 7 trailer sets = 77, 000 One standby transfer vehicle = 20, 000 619, 000 Capital investment, four. transfer stations = $1, 343, 000 The total estimated capital investment of the entire system; therefore comes to about $4, 490, 000. As a point of reference, it is interesting to note that, at the average going rate, the construction of one incinerator to handle the refuse production of the long-haul zone only would involve a capital outlay of about $6, 000, 000. -52- IX. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As a result of the investigation, study and research involved in the preparation of this report, it is possible to come to certain conclusions and recommendations which may be summarized below: 1. The County should retain its present responsibility of providing adequate and equitable disposal facilities for the County as a whole, with the Master Plan as its ultimate goal. The policy of County-wide adminis- tration has proved satisfactory under the present system of financing out of the General Tax Fund, whereby the cost of the program is shared by all property owners in the County. In spite of the tremendous drive in recent years of communities to incorporate in order to gain autonomy in the management of local affairs, the desire of these new cities to assume the responsibilities of providing for adequate refuse disposal has been noticeable by its absence. The fact is • that natural limitations as well as restrictive artificial boundaries make it virtually impossible for the County's cities to solve this problem economically on an individual basis. For without access to natural formations suitable for landfill, cities must resort to the much more costly method of incineration, assuming that the hazard of air pollution can be eliminated. The advantages of a unified administration eliminating the duplication of overhead costs are obvious, as are the economies to be derived from the concentration of equipment and labor in a minimum number of efficient operations. 2. Collection and short-haul transport of refuse should be administered on the local level in accordance with present practice. Even here, it is not unlikely that a County-wide collection system could effect a greater economy. -53- But it would be difficult to deny that a service such as this, in direct contact with the public, can best be conducted on a decentralized basis, which permits the processing of complaints and the enforcement of regu- lations to be handled by the nearest local governmental agency. The County's cities and sanitary districts are successfully maintaining an adequate collection system either by their own forces, or by contract with private collectors. 3. It is recommended that Ordinance No. 516 be amended to permit the disposal of residential garbage at those sites where the presence of this material will not cause a pollution of surface or under- ground waters or create a public nuisance. The ordinance was originally adopted in 1946 before the.advent of the- home grinder when garbage was a much larger component of the refuse set out for collection, and when all the County's disposal sites operated on a burning basis. Under present conditions, residential gar- ' bage constitutes only about 90/6 by weight of all refuse collected. That this quantity must be handled separately and transported over lengthening distances to outlying hog ranches represents an ever increasing expense that is not warranted by the methods of refuse disposal now in practice or those proposed for the future. It has been amply demonstrated in sanitary landfills operated by .other counties .that the small amount of garbage in- volved is almost unrecognizable in the overall delivery and has no adverse effect on the method of operation. All of Orange County's existing landfills have been approved for dis- posal of Class II material which, as defined by State and County Water Pollution Control Boards, includes garbage. However, due to local conditions, such as the direction of prevailing winds and the proximity of residential property, it would probably prove advisable to except certain sites where the presence of even minor amounts of garbage could cause public objec- tion. These particular sites are among the short-lived facilities described in Section III above. It is anticipated that future sites in the outlying canyon areas, acquired in-accordance with the Master Plan, will readily lend them- selves to the disposal of garbage. It must be understood, however, that garbage would be acceptable only as a component of a mixed refuse delivery from residential sources. Straight or wet garbage from produce houses, restaurants, and food process- ing plants still has a ready market and can continue to be dispensed with as it is today. The acceptance of mixed refuse (defined as a combination of garbage and non-combustible and combustible trash) would simplify collection pro- cedures by eliminating segregation by the resident into separate containers, and by the collector into separate compartments of the vehicle. It is desir- able, however, that the resident who combines food wastes with trash use a covered, water-tight container, and since it is almost standard practice in the County to collect garbage twice per week, it is felt that collection of mixed refuse should continue on this .same basis. These are recommendations offered by the County Health Department for consideration by local agencies responsible for control of collection procedures. 4. Because of the imminent closure of the two major disposal sites serving the northwestern portion of the County, Stations Nos. 15 and 18 (see Exhibit A), it is recommended that the first steps be taken toward the establishment of a transfer station in this area. This transfer station would -55- be one of the four proposed by the Master Plan for the long-haul zone and should be designed to ultimate capacity. By the time Station No. 10 closes, near the middle of 1961, a second transfer station will be required to meet the needs of the expanding population in this area. The third transfer station will not be needed until some time after 1965 when the population of the long-haul zone is expected to exceed 500, 000. In view of the nature of the operation and the heavy traffic anticipated, it seems almost mandatory that disposal at the transfer station be limited to regular refuse collection trucks only. It would be beyond the realm of economics to attempt to design unloading facilities for the more than 1000 vehicles which may ultimately be expected if the site were open to the general public; especially when it is realized that most of these vehicles would have to be manually unloaded, thereby occupying dumping space for considerable lengths of time. That these vehicles must be referred directly to the disposal site is not incompatible with the essence of this report. It has already been demonstrated that trash haul by the individual is seldom economical and, if anything, the effect of the above policy might be to discourage the practice. Of course, the individual is occasionally faced with the disposal of an article not generally handled by the collection agency and at these infrequent times, he will face the inconvenience of'the longer haul. By limiting traffic to collection vehicles only, operations may be estab- lished upon the normal 6-day collection week, and it would therefore seem desirable to set up an employee work schedule on this same basis. 5. As noted in Section III, Disposal Stations 12 and 19 (see Exhibit A) are due for closure in the near future. To avoid a critical situation in this _ -56- ' part of the County it is important to begin intensive studies e.f the "B" area (see Exhibit J) in order to locate a long-term facility that will fit the Master Plan. The possibility of acquiring a local pit is not to be overlooked; how- ever, this would have only a limited life, and a move to the Santa Ana Canyon area is inevitable. It should be stated here that although the Master Plan is offered as the ultimate solution in this, as well as other portions of the County, it does not preclude the acquisition of short-term facilities.which.may become available in more convenient locations and which may temporarily offer the advantages of a short haul. 6. It must be recognized that this report has attempted to take a long distance look into the future with the eyes of the present in a field which is still comparatively new and in a science which is still far from exact. Acceptance of the Master Plan as presented herein cannot mean that the final solution has been fixed for all time. It can only mean that it offers the best for this County on the basis of existing knowledge and accumulated research and experience. It is inevitable that many advancements will continue to be made in this field, and in order to take advantage of new developments as they appear, the Master Plan must be kept open to frequent review. -57- RECEIVED MAR 7 960 Cry d ffv;g w i CITY CLERK ti wd fa CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 77- 04 COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION — Yj�7"� HUNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito, City .Council Members City Administrator j03 ` Subject EXPANSION OF REFUSE Date July 27 , 1977 TRANSFER SERVICE Statement of Problem: The level of service provided by the County .transfer stations has declined over the past few years . This has resulted in Rainbow Disposal having to haul a greater proportion of the refuse collected in Huntington Beach directly to Coyote Canyon Landfill. In addition, the County is now planning to close the . Coyote Canyon Landfill at the end of 1980 . This closing will mean an even further drive for Rainbow and, thus, a higher cost to the City. Furthermore, Huntington Beach residents at this time are un- able to use the transfer stations for delivery of their larger items of refuse and instead must drive to a landfill site . Recommended Action: Adopt the attached resolution requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to provide for expanded services at the County transfer stations and to designate a new dump site to replace Coyote Canyon after its closure. Anal sis : The wording of this resolution reflects the concerns con- tained in° a letter to the City Council from the Garden Grove Sanitary District. This letter was brought before the Council at the July 18th meeting. At that meeting, Council directed that a resolution in sup- port of the Garden Grove Sanitary District ' s position be prepared. This resolution will be mailed to the Orange County Board of Supervisors in order to attempt to influence their level of funding for the trans- fer stations and budget deliberations which are now going on. Respectfully submitted, Floyd G Belsito, City Ad inistrator FGB/DLC:p Attachment 1 a Fq � M w 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY,P.O.BOX 1437 • GARDEN GROVE,CALIFORNIA 92642 • (714)534-3943 July 7, 1977 Huntington Beach City Council. 2000 Main Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: Enclosed please find copy of Resolution No. 2979 adopted by the Board of Directors of the Garden Grove Sanitary District in the regular meeting of July 6, 1977. Among the personnel from Engineering-Science, Inc . listed on page I-7 of Volume I - Study Summary as participating in the study were such as Dr. . Harvey F. Ludwig, Robert L. White and Frank R. Bowerman, some. of the foremost authorities in the in- dustry. The Study Summary, referred to in .the Resolution, is rec- ommended for your reading. We urge your city to adopt a similar resolution.- -and mail it to your-Supervisors. We are sending the attached to Supervisors Anthony, Clark, Riley and Schmit. If you have any questions concerning this Resolution No. 2979, -please call the Sanitary District office at 534-3943• Very t yours, bert H. Main 9 President WMB:bf U O O l5 . D Enc. JUL 11 1977 CITY. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL OFFICE �1 RESOLUTION NO. 2979 A RESOLUTION URGING ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO AUTHORIZE PURCHASE OF AND BUDGET FOR EQUIPMENT UR- GENTLY NEEDED AT TRANSFER STATIONS AND LANDFILLS . At a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the / Garden Grove Sanitary District held on July 6, 1977, on motion duly made and seconded, it was ordered that the following reso- lution be and the same is hereby adopted. WHEREAS , solid waste disposal in the County of Orange is fast becoming extremely onerous with population increasing and rubbish generation per capita steadily rising; and WHEREAS, hauling costs have escalated due to sharply higher prices for fuel, trucks, labor, and insurance; and WHEREAS , strict standards for solid waste disposal have been formulated in the County Solid Waste Management Plan mandated under State and Federal directives and heretofore adopted by the County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the principle of refuse transfer was est- blished as. an intrinsic part of the County' s waste disposal program with the adoption of the basic master plan of refuse disposal in 1959; and WHEREAS , the County of Orange has an integrated solid waste disposal system comprised of four• landfills generally in the easterly areas of the County and. three transfer stations established in the early 1960 ' s in the westerly areas of the County; and -WHEREAS; =:costs of :operating.`landfills -and:�transfer stations have always been paid from tax revenues; and WHEREAS , the concept of the combination of landfill and transfer station disposal has been praised throughout the industry and throughout the County as an ideal system for hand- ling solid waste; and WHEREAS , little rolling stock has been purchased for the transfer stations since they were established in the early -1- 1960' s, while the volume of trash generated has increased tre- mendously; and WHEREAS , the County Board of Supervisors authorized a study, under a HEW grant in 1968, of .the solid -waste management facilities .and capabilities, .with Engineering Sciences, Inc. , as principal .consultant; and WHEREAS , after two years of study, a Final Report, entitled "Maximum Utilization of Sanitary Landfills through Integrated Regional Planning" was published in two volumes, I and II in January, 1971, and in March, 1971, jointly by the Orange County Road Department and Engineering-Science, Inc: ; and WHEREAS, said Report stated that the whole concept of a., refuse system of disposal was based on the precept of provi- ding economical and equitable disposal service for the citizens of the County, and has proven to be effective, beneficial to the public, and economically sound; and WHEREAS , said report also stated that any curtailment or any shortsightedness in planning and budgeting which results in the provision of anything less than 100% transfer service destroys the basic premise upon which the program of transfer was established; and WHEREAS , said Report recommended purchase of equip- ment to provide for more efficient utilization of the transfer stations which at that time were capable .of handling only 80% of the solid waste collected by the municipal rubbish collectors in the area served by the stations; and WHEREAS , said recommendation specified the equipment to be acquired by number and type and the amounts to be included in the budget for each fiscal year through 1981; and WHEREAS , the County seemingly ignored this study and and the recommendations, and consistently disapproved requests for needed equipment year after year, even for replacement of deteriorating equipment; and \i WHEREAS, because of excessively stringent personnel policies, such equipment as is available and serviceable is frequently idle when drivers fail to report for work because of illnesses or for other reasons; and WHEREAS, with shortage of personnel and deterioration of the rolling stock, and with the increase in population and per capita of solid waste generated, the transfer stations in the Fiscal Year 1976 handled less than 43% of the solid waste collect- ed by the contract and franchise rubbish collectors in the areas intended to be served by the transfer stations; and WHEREAS , the remaining 57% of the solid waste collected by the contract and franchise rubbish collectors had to be hauled to the landfills in the easterly part of the County in individual trucks at a much higher cost than transporting by County trucks and trailer sets from the transfer stations; and WHEREAS, higher costs to municipal rubbish collectors invariably passed on to the contracting agencies and are ulti- mately paid for by the taxpayers; and WHEREAS , it is a misuse of the taxpayers ' investment in the transfer stations to operate these facilities at a fraction of their capacity and requirements because of lack of rolling stock; and WHEREAS , the County Board of Supervisors has authorized the use of Transfer Station No. 1 in Stanton by the public on Saturdays on a trial basis for three months; and WHEREAS, allowing the public to use the transfer sta- tions on days they are not being used by the municipal rubbish haulers would sharply decrease the number of individual trips in small vehicles to the landfills thus reducing fuel consumption, lowering air pollution, saving time and money, and alleviating traffic congestion; and WHEREAS, allowing the public to use conveniently lo- cated transfer stations will encourage a cleaner and safer en- vironment by disposal of discarded hazards and eyesores; and -3- WHEREAS , a need will exist in 1981 for a transfer station to serve Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Laguna, Irvine , Tustin, and the southern part of Santa Ana when the Coyote Canyon landfill located on Irvine Ranch property is projected to close; and WHEREAS , scheduled time table for opening a new trans- fer station is four years; and WHEREAS, the Garden Grove Sanitary District Board of Directors is extremely concerned about the trend in the solid waste disposal facilities in the County in general and the trans- fer stations in particular. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the Orange County Board of Supervisors be urged to: 1. Include in the budget for the Fiscal Year 1977-78 at least $2, 000,000 for transfer station truck and trailer sets and $2,000, 000 for landfills for graders, packers , and scrapers, and other equipment needed to replace deteriorated equipment and provide for efficient utilization of the transfer stations and landfills. 2. Establish a labor pool from which drivers and other personnel can be drawn to operate landfill and transfer station equipment as required to fill in for absentees; and 3. Authorize immediate initiation of action to pro- vide for opening in 1981 of a new transfer station to serve the Cities now using the Coyote dump. 4 . Authorize opening of all transfer stations to the public on the days they are not being used by contract or fran- chise rubbish collectors. VOTE POLLED: AYES Unanimous BOARD MEMBERS : Bressel, Culver, NOES None Main, Perry, Slade ABSENT ADOPTED AND SIGNED this 6th day of July, 1977 r -4- P SIDENT- Robert H. Main SECRETARY. - Waiter M. Bressel ATTEST: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Reso- lution was passed and adopted by the Sanitary Board of the Garden Grove Sanitary District of Orange County, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of July. SECRETARY of Garden Grove Sanitary `District, Orange County, California City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX ISO . CALIFORNIA 9260 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 29, 1976 Ruben Hernandez, General Manager City Disposal Service Company P.O. Box 495 Yorba Linda, California 92686 Dear Mr. Hernandez: Please be advised that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned .regular meeting held Tiesday, October 26, 1976 denied your company's request for Certificate of Public Need and Necessity for commercial refuse collection. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:tr 113 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 7 6-1 7 0 COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUN CATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To The Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito City Council Members City Administrator Subject CITY DISPOSAL' S REQUEST FOR Date October 21 , 1976 CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND NECESSITY City Disposal Service Company of Yorba Linda has applied to the City for a certificate of public need and necessity entitling the company to engage in commercial refuse service within Huntington Beach. Chapter 8 . 20 of the Municipal Code sets forth the requirement for such a cer- tificate and the procedure for application and approval or denial of the certificate. Section 8 . 20 . 200 states , "A certificate shall be granted by the City Council upon a finding that the public need and necessity requires the operation or provision of the service proposed by applicant . . . " In accordance with Section 8 . 20 .190 , various department directors have re- viewed the application. None has responded with any negative findings about the applicant. Neither has any need for another commercial refuse company been noted. The Assistant City Attorney has pointed out that the City' s agreement for residential service with Rainbow Disposal Company requires re-negotiation of the terms of the contract if a cer- tificate is granted to another company for commercial service. The reason for the provision is that the operation of another company in the City might adversely affect Rainbow' s commercial operations and thus also affect their ability to perform the residential service within the compen- sation structure agreed to . RECOMMENDATION Since the granting of the certificate would require re-negotiation of the residential refuse collection contract- -possibly at a higher cost to the City- =denial of the application is recommended. Respectfully submitted, Floyd Belsito City Administrator FGB :bb �5. (r CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE COMPANY P.O. Box 495 YORBA LINDA, CALIF. 92686 TELEPHONE: (714) 528-7948 OR (714) 993-7036 RCCCivEe, C; ,' CLERK HUNTINGT N EE4CH,Cig 175 SEp September 9, 1976 1S Dn Z City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California .SU: SANITATION.APPLICATION - APPLICATION. FOR.C$RTIFICATION OF. NEED AND NECESSITY Gentlemens We would like to introduce ourselves - Mr. Edward Hernandez and Mr. Cipriano Hernandez - partners-owners of City Disposal Service Company. Our General Manager is Mr. Ruben Hernandez. Our company is very capable of keeping our service at the utmost. compared .to most. We have been in business since 1962, and have come a long way since then. I can finally introduce to the City Council of Huntington Beach that, City Disposal Service Co., is servicing Yorba Linda and Garden Grove. City Disposal Service would like to give commercial sanitation service to areas adj6ining Garden Grove, and also to her neighboring cities, for example, Huntington Beach. If granted, .we will give service to any areas of Huntington Beach that might b0 needed. Our company wishes to expand and grow with the City of Huntington Beach, since it is expanding, we feel Huntington Beach.will need expanded ser- vices. We are hopeful that we may grow together. City Disposal Service is aware that the City of Huntington Beach is very large. Large enough for competition for those concerned.. Listed below'are our Daily Service-Rates of Pick-Up-Monthly: 1. 2 34 5 6 1-6 �� 11 1-P3 k . J 3 1-40 1 1 2-45 2-60 2-75 2-90 2- 00 3-6o 3-75 3-90- 3-105. 3-115 4-15 4-90 4-105 4-120 4-130 5-90 5-105 5-120 5-135 5-145 6-105 6-126 6-135 .6-150 6-160 One time a week service, one bin $16.00 per month to Six times a week service, six bins, $160000�per month. �l�i 1-7 2. We feel that. we are a very competitive company that can offer the City of Huntington Beach a.good service. We hope to hear from you soon regarding our Sanitation Application. Respectfully yo rs, uben Hernandez, Gen. City Disposal Service Co. P.O. Box 495 Yorba Linda, Calif. 92686 RH:js 8 . 2,,. 09.0--8. 20. 120 collection contractor and make special arrangements to have the items. removed. The refuse collection contractor may levy a charge for removal of such items under a schedule and formula to be uniformly applied, based on weight and size of the iterns , which formula and schedule shall have been approved by the director. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20 . 090 Collection Manner. The owner, occupant, tenant . or lessee of any premises shall remove, or cause to be removed, all garbage from said premises at least once a week. The city refuse collector shall remove from, the premises all refuse which has been placed for collection, which refuse is of a type and in an amount provided by contract with the city. Any removal of refuse by the city refuse collector, any refuse collector, or any person shall be performed in a neat , orderly and quiet fashion, without causing damage to the container or the lid. Any spilled matter shall be picked up by the person responsible for the spillage, and the premises shall be left in a clean and orderly condition. Refuse shall be the property of the collector thereof from the time of pickup to the time of disposal. (Ord. 1788 11/72 ; Ord. 1688 , 12/71) . 8 . 20. 100 Collection--Single family residence . (a) The city , or some person under contract with the city to do so., shall operate and maintain a service for the collection of refuse from single family residences in the city , on a regu- larly scheduled basis approved by resolution of the city council, not less frequently than once Each week. The direc- tor may by regulation exclude from such service any item or substance deemed hazardous, obnoxious or otherwise inap- propriate for such service . (b ) All refuse included in the basic level of service, which is generated, accumulated, and lawfully placed for collection at any single family residence in the city, shall be collected exclusively by the city refuse collector. (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ' Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8. 20 .110 Collection--Other premises. Any premises other than single family residences may , at . the option of the owner or occupant thereof, use the collection service operated by the city refuse collector, as hereinbefore pro- vided, ' for refuse not excluded from the basic level of service . (Ord. 1788 , 11/72; Ord. 16883 12/71) . 8. 20. 120 Collection--Excluded refuse. The owner or occupant of each and every premises in the city which generates 207 8. 2.0 . 130--8.'2r, . _.60 refuse c.XCll.der] from the basic level of service , and the owner or occupant of premises other than a single family residence who has chosen not to use the collection service operated by the city refuse collector for refuse generated on the premises , shall contract for the collection of all such refuse with some lawful refuse collector in the city; such excluded refuse may also be removed and disposed of by such owner. or occupant in a manner approved by the director and consistent with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688, 12/71 ) . 8 .20. 130 Collection--City contract . Any other provision . of this code to the contrary notwithstanding, the city may enter into contracts with responsible persons for the collection of refuse .within the city utilizing such procurement procedures and upon such terms and conditions as are deemed appropriate in the premises . Persons awarded contracts pursuant to this section shall be exempt from provisions of Section 8. 20. 160 of this chapter during the term thereof. (Ord. 1974 , 7 May 1975; Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 .20. 140 Transportation--Conveyance approval. No refuse . collector shall transport refuse in a conveyance that has not been approved by the director. All vehicles used in collect ing and transporting refuse shall be provided with metal bodies so constructed as to be leakproof and to prevent loss , spillage or blowing away of any contents collected or trans- ported within the city . Such vehicles shall be thoroughly cleaned daily to eliminate odors and decayed materials . (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20. 150 Disposal methods . No refuse collector or other person shall dispose of refuse, except by one of the following methods : (a) By burying refuse in a sanitary landfill that is designed, operated and equipped in accordance with regula- tions set forth by the board of supervisors of Orange County; (b ) By burning refuse in an incinerator of a type approved by the director; (c ) Any person may dispose of refuse from premises owned, occupied 'or used by such person in a manner approved by the director and consistent with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688; 12/71) . 8 . 20 . 160 Disposal--Certificate required when. No person shall remove , transport or dispose of refuse without a certificate of public need and necessity as granted by the. cite council under the provisions of this code , provided 208 20. 170--8.20.200 that this section shall apply to no person lawfully dispos- ing of refuse from his own residence or business establish- ment. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 170 Certificate--Application--Filing. An applica- tion for a certificate shall be filed with the city clerk. Each. application shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee in the amount of fifty dollars . (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 180 Certificate--Application--Contents. The appli- cation shall be in writing and verified, and shall contain the following information: (A) The name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural person; or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorpora- tion, address and telephone number of its principal place of business, and the names of its principal officers , togeth- er with their respective residence and business telephone numbers ; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated company, the names of the` partners or of the persons compris- ing such association or .company, and the business and resi- dence of each partner; (B) The schedule of "rates proposed to be charged for such service; (C) The volume or extent of the service proposed to be provided; (D) The application .shall contain such additional in- formation as . the council may require. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .190 Certificate--Application--Transmitted to . de- partments . Upon receipt of the application for a certifi- cate , the city clerk shall send a copy of .the application to the city administrator, the department of building and safe- ty, planning department, police department and department of public works for report to the city administrator con- cerning the need and necessity for. such service. (Ord. 1788 (part). , 197.2 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .200 Certificate--Granting_. A certificate shall be granted by the city council upon a finding that the public need and necessity requires the operation or provision of the service proposed by applicant, and that the experience , back- ground, capitalization and equipment is such that applicant is likely to comply .with all laws and is likely to provide services in a manner .which will reasonably satisfy the needs of the area proposed to be served. In the event that the number of applicants shall exceed the number of certificates required by public need 'and necessity, the city council 209 8. 20. 210--8 . 20. 240 w shall grant the required certificate or certificates to the applicant or applicants it deems best suited under the stan- dards set forth in this section. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 210 Other licenses and permits . The granting of a certificate pursuant to this chapter shall not relieve any person of his duty to obtain licenses and permits required by other chapters of this code, nor from complying with any ordinance of this city or law of this state. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 220 Certificate--Council hearing. Upon receipt of the application for a certificate, the city clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the city council at the next meeting at which it is possible for the matter to be heard, provided such public hearing shall be not less than thirty days after the application is. filed. The clerk shall give the applicant written notice of the time , date and place of hearing at least ten days prior to the hearing unless such notice is waived by applicant in writing. The applicant, as well as any person connected therewith, shall answer all questions propounded at the hearing by or on behalf of any member of the city council. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 230 Certificate--Council action. After hearing, the city council may grant the certificate to the full ex- tent requested, deny the application, or grant a portion of the application, and may impose any conditions on the grant- ing of such certificate , or on the exercise of the privi- leges thereby granted, as the city council deems necessary for the protection of the public health and safety and for the general welfare of the residents of the city. The de- . cision of the city council granting in whole or in part any certificate shall be by resolution, and any such deci- sion or a decision to deny the application shall be final. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 240 Certificate--Revocation. Any certificate may be suspended or revoked by the city council or addition- al conditions may be imposed upon any certificate holder, after notice to certificate holder and hearing, for the fol- lowing reasons : (A) Failure to provide the service efficiently for which the certificate was issued; (B) Failure to comply with applicable laws , ordinances or regulations or with the reasonable instructions or direc- tions of the director; (C) . Failure to secure .and maintain in� effect the insur- ance required by this chapter; 210 i •�., 8 . 2.. . 250--8. 20 . 260 (d) Failure to acquire any permit required by this code or to pay any license fee required by this code; (e ) Failure to keep structures., equipment or vehicles in a safe , sanitary, lawful and operable condition at all times ; (f) Failure to comply with any condition imposed as provided hereunder. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) 8.20. 250 Liability insurance . The applicant shall file with the city clerk, prior to the issuance of any certificate, and thereafter keep in full force and effect , a certificate of insurance, issued by an. insurance carrier authorized to do business in the state, insuring the public against any loss or damage that may result to any person or persons or property from the operation of such service and naming the city as an additional insured, provided that the minimum •liability limits shall be as follows : (a) Combined single limit bodily injury and/or property damage, including products liability, $1,000 ,000 aggregate; (b ) Additional Insured Endorsement . The insured agrees that the city of Huntington 'Beach, and/or members of the Huntington Beach city council, and/or all city council-appointed groups , committees , commissions , boards and any other city council-appointed body, and/or elective and appointive offi- cers , servants or employees of the city, when acting as such are additional assureds hereunder. (c ) Hold Harmless Agreement . The insured agrees to pro- tect , defend, indemnify and save harmless the city against loss , damage or expense by reason of any suits, claims , demands, judgments and causes of action caused by insured, his employees, agents or any subcontractor arising out of or in consequence of the performance of all operations covered by this certificate . Such certificate shall provide that any policy required hereunder cannot be cancelled without thirty days ' written notice to the director. (Ord. 1882, 12/73; Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688, 12/71) 8. 20 . 260 Violation--Penalty. (a) Any person who vio- lates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or by imprisonment not exceeding six months , or by both. Each day of the existence of any continuing violation shall constitute a separate offense. (b ) The provisions of this chapter shall be enforced by the department of public works of the city. (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688 , 12/71) 211 8 .24. 010-=8 . 24 50 Chapter 8 .24 DUST--INDUSTRIAL WASTE Sections : 8 .24 . 010 Industrial waste defined. 8 .24. 020 Prohibited when nuisance . 8 . 24 .030 Escape of smoke, carbon and soot . 8 .24. 040 Abatement--Owner notification. 8 .24. 050 Abatement--Notice direction. 8 .24 . 060 Abatement--Notice--Service . 8 .24 . 070 . Abatement--Failure. 8. 24. 080 Abatement--Notice of city intention. 8.24. 090 Abatement--Hearing request . ! 8. 24 .100 Abatement--Refusal--Misdemeanor. 8. 24 .110 Provisions nonexclusive . 8.24 . 010 Industrial waste defined. "Industrial waste" means any and all liquid or solid waste substance in sewage from any processing or manufacturing of whatever nature . (Ord. 1091, 10/64) . 8. 24. 020 Prohibited when nuisance. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to permit, maintain, or create a situation wherein the dust, smoke, soot , carbon or indus- trial waste on any property, under his , her or its control, creates a public nuisance . (Ord. 1253, 9/66; Ord. 1091, 10/64 ) . 8.24 . 030 Escape of smoke , carbon and soot . No person shall cause, permit or allow smoke, carbon or soot from any fire being operated, used, maintained or fired by such per- son to escape from any smokestack, chimney, flue, vent , fire- box, kiln or furnace . (Ord. 1253, 9/66) , 8. 24. 040 Abatement--Owner Notification. Whenever there exists in any place within the city a public nuisance, as defined by Section 1. 04. 010 (f) of this code, created by industrial waste or dust, a health officer, police officer or the city attorney shall notify in writing the record owner or person having control or possession of such place or premises to abate such nuisance . (Ord. 1935, 10/74; Ord. 1253, 9/66; Ord. 1091, 10/64 ) . 8. 24. 050 Abatement--Notice direction. The notice shall direct the owner or person in control or possession of the place or premises , within the time specified in said notice, to abate the nuisance and to perform any and all work neces- sary to prevent the recurrence thereof in the places or prem- ises specified in the notice . (Ord. 1091, 10/64) . 212 HECITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION -/HUNTINCTON BEACH V To FLOYD G. BELSITO From EARLE W. ROBITAILLE City Administrator Chief of Police Subject CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE CO. Date OCTOBER 7, 1976 Application for Certificate of Need and Necessity Attached is information received from our Administrative Vice Unit in reference to the above request. Based on information available we can see no reason to prohibit application for Certificate of Need and Necessity for City Disposal Service Company. ca EARLE W. ROBITAI LE Chief of Police EWR:fl Atc. cc: Lt. Brown City Clerk nD 0 C T 1976 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE s . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To EARLE W. ROBITAILLE From D. L. BROWN, Lieutenant Chief of Police Adm. Vice/Org. Crime Subject CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE CO. Date OCTOBER 6, 1976 Application for Certificate of Need and Necessity Pursuant to Huntington Beach City Ordinance 8.20.190, the Huntington Beach Police Department has reviewed the applicants involved in City Disposal Service Company, Yorba Linda, California, who have applied for certification of need and necessity. The review by Huntington Beach Police Department only concerned possible criminal record. Persons involved: Cipriano HERNANDEZ - DOB 11-19-25 11712 Dalwood Avenue, Norwalk, CA Ruben HERNANDEZ - DOB 6-3-48 11712 Dalwood Avenue, Norwalk, CA Edward Holguin HERNANDEZ - DOB 12-20-33 6814 Lakeview, Yorba Linda, CA A check through State, Local, and National.sources reveals no minor traffic violations. At this point, Huntington Beach Police Department sees no moral or criminal reason to prohibit application for Certificate of Need and Necessity for City Disposal Service Company. � . L D. L. BROWN, Lieutenant DLB:dsq Atc. • - �� d CITY ON siwCM INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NU76 n+Tu+craN pAM > Y' rR ss To City Administrator L From Alieia-;V6 *MtWostb �w ! City Clark Ptis�" Subject Application for Cestilipi ' Ostu Sapeaoy - j����L''R Public-Need d NeCsaaitY� City Disposal Sesviea . r{yXam?.y'1 l4 l� 7^ 'i --� s,� 411a��,n`•� - '. t r�- -.,.�'.{?�s;- �'_•F"'(4� _1�i; � 'iy`' 1 ) - -R1 � +7 �+ r li-ry �'� :Mi+ ny�1t ��� Pursuant to, 8.Z0.-190 k .a ttu appliefa 'toe a , Certificate `of PubiiG , !t�►; i�►`; sal sem: i a Stsvira Co. err according.to 8tctvo BQ 7 k tp�lcR 11�a11 b�i?�4t sees. d �; 3 , than 30 days 4i 'tiled, •O{ pnllic l�aslnR>Y 1Y,T ti r, ;} on this matter iiQtd �' O tobas"Sb i9y6 Cpaaci>G aai8 ; ;� . -�tt RT•'�SS �'"-tl t- :• 1 ' � Wit. - d 1. We. have also forwt�dad ., t lmildin�, Planner, Polies: sad { } } Public Works for rapost �i4"` 0A ke pursuant to. 8.20.194. ii1+4 a,y�it., } 3z r Y1_ �t` - Carbon copie Buildlus- Police and Public Works He ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To H. E. Hartge From Michael Zambory Subject Application for Certification Date October 19, 1976 of Public Need and Necessity- City Disposal Service Co. The City Disposal Service Co. is owned by 'Edward and Cipriano Hernandez doing business as "City Disposal Service Co. " They have applied for a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity from the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to Section 8 .20.190 of the Municipal Code to collect commercial refuse. While checking the application, I discovered that City Disposal Service Co. has been doing business since 1962. Their application further states that they have contracts in the cities of Yorba Linda and Garden Grove. I telephoned both Yorba Linda and Garden Grove to determine the reputation of the City Disposal Service Co. Both cities agreed they have a responsible attitude toward their work and that they cooperate fully with problems involving complaints. They only collect commercial refuse. They do not collect residential refuse in either of the cities. The City Disposal Service Co. has applied to our city for the collection of commercial refuse. I see no reason why their request for a certificate should not be granted. c Michael Zhmbory City Enginee MZ:jy A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BIEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HIiNTINGTON BEACH To City Clerk From Joh hrena, Director Buil g d Community Development Subject Application for Certification Date October 20, . 1976 of Public Need and Necessity-- City Disposal Service Co. This department has no official comment to make on the subject application since the subject does not really relate to our normal functions. However, I would generally agree with the comments of the Public Works Department. JFB/vl � ems, CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE COMPANY P.O. BOX 495 YORBA LINDA, CALIF. 92686 TELEPHONE: (714) 528-7948 OR (714) 993-7036 C1,Fg►YEp` HUNT/NGTCN EE CHI q76 SEP "' September 9, 1976 1 S Ply 2 2`7 r City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California SU: SANITATION APPLICATION - APPLICATION._FOR,.;CERTIFICATION OF NEED AND NECESSITY Gentlemen: We would like to introduce ourselves - Mr. Edward Hernandez and Mr. Cipriano Hernandez - partners-owners of City Disposal Service Company. Our General Manager is Mr. Ruben Hernandez. Our company is very capable of keeping our service at the utmost compared to most. We have been in business since 1962, and have come a long way since then. I can finally introduce to the City Council of Huntington Beach that, City Disposal Service Co. , is servicing Yorba Linda and Garden Grove. City Disposal Service would like to give commercial sanitation service to areas adjoining Garden Grove, and also to her neighboring cities, for _example, Huntington Beach. If granted, we will give service to any areas of Huntington Beach that might be needed. Our company wishes to expand and grow with the City of Huntington Beach, since it is expanding, we feel Huntington Beach will need expanded ser- vices. We are hopeful that we may grow together. City Disposal Service is aware that the City of Huntington Beach is very large. Large enough for competition for those concerned. Listed below are our Daily Service-Rates of Pick-Up-Monthly: 1 2 3 4 5 6 1-16 1-22 1-28 1-34 1-4o 1=46 2-45 2-6o 2-75 2-90 2-100 3-6o 3-75 3-90 3-105 3-115 4-75 4-90 4-105 4-120 4-130 5-90 5-105 5-120 5-135 5-145 6-105 6-120 6-135 6-150 6-160 One time a week service, one bin, $16.00 per month to Six times a week service, six bins, $160.00 per month. , ) V� . 2. We feel that we are a very competitive company that can offer the City of Huntington Beach a good service. We hope to hear from you soon regarding our Sanitation Application. Respectfully yo rs, Ruben Hernandez, Gen. ManaC4r City Disposal Service Co. P.o. Box 495 Yorba Linda, Calif. 92686 RH:js V' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To City Clerk From Planning Department Subject Application for Certificate Date October 4, 1976 of Public Need and Necessity - City Disposal Service Co. The Planning Department has revi6wed subject application pursuant to Section 8. 20. 190. The Department has no comment. MF:gc 3 A ` VA OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION c'iN HUNTINGTON BEACH 'ja : To - FLOYD G. BELSITO From EARLE W. ROBITAILLE City, Administrator" Chief of Police 'a: CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE CO. OCTOBER 7, 1976 Subject Date Application for Certificate of Need and Necessity Attached is information received from our Administrative Vice Unit in reference to the .above request. 4 Based on information available we can see no reason to prohibit "- application for Certificate of Need and Necessity for City Disposal ". + Service Company. EARLE W. ROBITAILLE . " Chief of Police d: EWR:fl Atc.. cc: Lt. Brown / City Clerk/ _ 1 y J - ' s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION, HUNTINGTON BEACH .To - EARLS W. ROBITAILLE From D. L. BROWN, Lieutenant Chief of Police Adm. Vice/Org. Crime Subject CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE CO. Date OCTOBER 6, 1976 Application for Certificate of Need and Necessity Pursuant to Huntington Beach City Ordinance 8.20.190, the Huntington Beach Police Department has reviewed the applicants involved in City Disposal Service Company, Yorba Linda, California, who have applied v for certification of need and necessity.. The review by Huntington Beach Police Department only concerned possible criminal record. Persons involved: Cipriano HERNANDEZ - DOB 11-19-25 11712 Dalwood Avenue, Norwalk, CA Ruben HERNANDEZ - DOB 6-3-48 11712 Dalwood Avenue, Norwalk, CA Edward Holguin HERNANDEZ - DOB 12-20-33 6814 Lakeview, Yorba Linda, CA A check through State, Local, and National sources reveals no minor traffic violations. At this point, Huntington Beach Police Department sees no moral or criminal reason to prohibit application for Certificate of Need and Necessity for City Disposal Service Comp any. D. L. BROWN, Lieutenant DLB:dsq Atc. YYrr !1: CITY OF,,"."v"TINiGT #4 BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON UAC14 To City Administrator r From Aliciat Mac Wentworth. City..Clerk", Subject Application -for Certificate of '. ,... Date September 21•, 1976 a Public Need d Necessity.: = r. City Disposal Service Cc. t R^ :Pursuant "to- 8.20.194 we, axe transmitting the.; appIicatioa ,for:. Certificate of Public Need b',Ngcessitp ;fro'a.•City,',Disposal •Service Co s .according to Section &20.22i% " ,hi public :heaxirig shell be•;not Iesa than 30 days after: the .application is=filed,: so the public ,hearing } on this matter woul' J'be:,he1.4.1, ' the October 26, 1976 Council' meeting:. We have also ,forwarded copies to •Building, Planning, Police: and Public Works for--repoxt''to put office pursuant:to`-8.20.19'0. s • Carbon copies: , Building, Planning Police and Public Works P N- City of Huntington Beach j P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA !mod OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 4, 1976 Ruben Hernandez, Gen. Manager City Disposal Service Co. P. 0. Box 495 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Dear Mr. Hernandez: Please be informed that the public hearing on your application for a Certificate. of Public Need and Necessity has been scheduled for the City Council meeting to be held Tuesday, October 26, 1976, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber. If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:wm -0. 010 Chapter 8 . 20 REFUSE . Sections :. 8. 20. 010 Definitions . 8 .20. 020 Leaving in public places . 8 . 20. 030 Occupant responsible for premises , 8, 20 . 040 Accumulation prohibited. 8 .20. 050 Storage . 8. 20. 060 Containers--Location, 8 .20. 070 . Container--Interference . 8 .20 . 080 Container--Improper substances. 8. 20. 090 Collection--Manner. 8 . 20 . 100 Collection--Single family residence . 8. 20. 110 Collection--Other premises . 8 . 20 . 120 Collection--Excluded refuse. 8 . 20. 130 Collection--City contract . , 8 . 20. 140 Transportation--Conveyance approval. 8 . 20 . 150 Disposal methods . 8 . 20. 160 Disposal--Certificate required when. 8 . 20.170 Certificate--Application--Filing. 8 . 20 . 180 Certificate--Application--Contents . 8 . 20. 190 Cer.tificate--Application--Transmitted to departments . 8. 20. 200 Certificate--Granting. 8 .20. 210 Other licenses and permits . 8 . 20. 220 Certificate--Council hearing. 8 .20. 230 Certificate--Council action. 8 . 20. 240 Certificate--Revocation. 8 .20. 250 Liability insurance. 8 . 20 . 260 Violation--Penalty. 8 . 20. 010 Definitions . The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of these regulations : (a) "Basic level of service" means that level of col- lection and disposal service necessary to collect refuse generated by an average family in one single family resi- dence, as specifically provided in any given contract between the city and any person for collection of such refuse, or as provided by resolution of the city council. Refuse items or substances excluded from collection by regulation of the director or by ' contract , as hereinafter provided; refuse capable thereof which has not been placed in containers or bundles within the weight and size limits hereinafter set forth for containers or bundles, any unit of refuse which exceeds four feet in length or which exceeds forty pounds in weight, and any amount of refuse 201 ' a 8 . 20 . 010 j 3 in excess of that provided by such contract or such resolution az that generated by an average family in one single family residence, are excluded from the "basic level of service. " (b ) "City refuse collector" means any collector either employed by or under contract with the city to provide re- moval, transportation, and disposition of refuse from resi- dents. and users of premises within the city. (c ) "Collection" means pickup, removal, transportation or disposition of refuse, except by a person with refuse from premises owned, occupied or used by such person, as hereinafter provided. (d) "Director" means the Huntington Beach director of public works or his authorized representative. (e ) "Garbage" means all putrescible solid wastes, in- cluding but not limited to vegetable matter, animal offal and carcassesof small animals, . discarded food containers, leaves , cuttings, trimming from trees, shrubs and grass, excluding human excrement and animal manure. (f) "Nonsingle family residence" means and includes all locations specifically excluded from subsection (k) . (g) "Person" means any individual, firm, governmental unit , organization, partnership; corporation, company or other entity. (h) "Refuse" includes both garbage and rubbish. (i ) "Refuse collector" means any person who picks up, removes, transports or disposes of refuse,- other than one who does so from his own premises . Q ) "Rubbish" means all nonputrescible solid wastes, including but not limited to special handling items such as trees , tree limbs , logs, automobile bodies, motor vehicle parts, building materials, appliances, household goods, sod and dirt, metal, wood and rock. (k) "Single family residence" means and includes every lot in the city upon which is situated one dwelling unit designed for or used as living quarters by human beings. It shall not include any lot upon which there is located any hotel, motel, lodge, hall, club, tourist camp, trailer camp, church, business or industrial establishment, or any lot containing more than one dwelling unit or any lot upon which any .commercial or industrial activity is conducted unless such activity is conducted in a single family residence. 202 (Pages 203 - 204 are not used. ) .20. 020--8. 20. 050 (L) "Solid wastes" means all putrescible and nonpu- trescible solid or semi-solid wastes including semi-liquid or wet wastes with insufficient moisture and other liquid contents to be free flowing. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .020 Leaving in public places . No person shall deposit, sweep, throw, discard or leave any refuse or cause such refuse to be deposited, swept, placed, thrown, discarded or left upon any public street, highway, alley, . sidewalk, street parking or other public place in this city. .(Ord. 1788 (part) , 1.972 : Ord. 250 , 1922) . 8. 20 . 030 Occupant responsible for premises . Every person occupying, using or controlling any premises shall keep the premises in a clean and sanitary condition, and no person shall permit any sewer effluent, excrement, slop or stagnant water, butcher offal , market refuse , garbage, dead animal or any other noxious or offensive matter of any kind, or .any other substance that may become offensive , to be de- posited or to remain thereon except as otherwise provided by law. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .040 Accumulation prohibited. No person occupying, using or controlling any premises shall permit any refuse to accumulate thereon, nor shall any such person maintain any accumulation of refuse thereon, unless in either event the same . is stored in a manner approved by the director or by law. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 050 Storage. (A) Garbage shall. be stored in a container of a type approved by the director. Every such container shall be constructed of metal , or equally durable material, in such a manner as to be strong, watertight, not easily corrodible, fly-proof, and rodent-proof. Such con- tainer shall have handles or-other attachments designed for and capable of lifting, and shall have covers which shall be kept in place at all times , except when garbage or other refuse is being deposited or removed- from such container. Such cover when in- place shall fit 'so as to render fly-proof any covered container. A sufficient number of containers shall be provided to hold at least one week's accumulation of garbage. Each garbage container shall be kept clean so that no odor or other nuisance will exist. Containers for single family residences shall have ' a capacity not to ex- ceed thirty-two gallons and shall not weigh more .than six- ty pounds when filled. (B) Rubbish shall be stored in such a manner that it will not provide harborage to rats , nor cause a fire hazard. (C) Equally durable nonmetallic containers may include but shall not be limited to heavy plastic or "wet-strength" low 205 8 . 20. 060--8 . 20. 080 kraft paper throwaway. refuse bags of a type approved by the director. Such bags shall comply with all of the requirements of subsections (A) and (B) except for the requirements of handles and covers . (D) Tree trimmings and other similar matter shall be tied in bundles measuring not more than four feet long and weighing not more than forty pounds . (Ord. :- 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .060 Containers--Location. (A) Each refuse con- tainer and any accumulation of refuse which is for collection, shall be kept or placed in such a manner as not to be visi- ble from the public street except during or for the time fixed for to collection thereof. During such period, any containers or any accumulation of refuse which is for col- lection, shall be- placed as follows : (1) Near Alley . On the premises , within five feet of the rear property line, where there .is a through alley in the rear of the premises ; (2) Access from Side .Entrance. On the premises at an accessible point- adjacent to any side entrance thereto where no through alley exists ; (3) At Curb. At the curb in front of the premises , where no through alley or side entrance exists . (B) No refuse container nor any accumulation of refuse which is for collection, shall be placed for collection in any public way, or at any curb or in any location visible from a public street, prior to six p.m. on the day preceding collection; any such refuse container shall be removed with- in two hours after collection, and in no case later than ten p.m. on the day of collection. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .070 Container--Interference. No person except the owner thereof, his agent or employee, a duly authorized city employee, or any employee of the refuse collection con- tractor, shall interfere in any manner with any refuse con- tainer, or any accumulation of rufuse which is for collec- tion, nor shall any person remove such container or accumu- lation from the location where it shall have been placed by the owner, his agent or his employee. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .080 Container--Improper substances . No person shall place or cause or permit to be placed in any refuse container any substance or material other than refuse as defined in this chapter. Large items included in the def- inition of rubbish , exceeding four feet in length or forty pounds in weight, shall not be placed in refuse containers . Persons wishing to dispose of such large rubbish items shall inform either the department of public works or the refuse 206 8 : , _ . 090--8. 20. 120 collection contractor and make special arrangements to have the items, removed. The refuse collection contractor may levy a charge for removal of such items under a schedule and formula to be uniformly applied, based on weight and size of the items , which formula and schedule shall have been approved by the director. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20 . 090 Collection Manner. The owner, occupant, tenant or lessee of any premises shall remove, or cause to be removed, all garbage from said premises at least once a week. The city refuse collector shall remove from: the premises all refuse which has been placed for collection, which refuse is of a type and in an amount provided by contract with the city. Any removal of refuse by the city refuse collector, any refuse collector, or any person shall be performed in a neat , orderly and quiet fashion, without causing damage to the container or the lid. Any spilled matter shall be picked up by the person responsible for the spillage, and the premises shall be left in a .clean and orderly condition Refuse shall be the property of the collector thereof from the time of pickup to the time of disposal. (Ord. 1788 11/72 ; Ord. 1688 , 12/71) . 8 . 20. 100 Collection--Single family residence . (a) The city , or some person under contract with the city to do so,, shall operate and maintain a service for the collection of refuse from single family residences in the city , on a regu- larly scheduled basis approved by resolution of the city council, not less frequently than once Each week. The direc- tor may by regulation exclude from such service_any item or substance deemed hazardous , obnoxious or otherwise inap- propriate for such service . (b ) All refuse• included in- the basic level of service, which is generated, accumulated, and lawfully placed for collection at any single family- residence in the city, shall be collected exclusively by the city refuse collector. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8. 20 . 110 Collection--Other premises . Any premises other than single family residences may , at the option of the owner or occupant thereof, use the collection service operated by the city refuse collector, as hereinbefore pro- vided, for refuse not excluded from the basic level of service . (Ord. 1788 , 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8. 20. 120 Collection--Excluded refuse. The owner or occupant of each and every premises in the city which generates 207. . : •r . 20 . 130--8. 20 . .,.uO rof.'ii.se exclude(] from the basic level of service , and the owner or occupant of premises other than a single -family residence who has chosen not to use the collection service operated by the . cit•y refuse collector for refuse generated on the premises , shall contract for the collection of all such refuse with some lawful refuse collector in the city; such excluded refuse may also be removed and disposed of by such owner or occupant in a manner approved by the director and consistent with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71 ) . 8 .20. 130 Collection--City contract . Any other provision . of this code to the contrary notwithstanding, the city may enter into contracts with responsible persons for the collection of refuse .within the city utilizing such procurement procedures and upon such terms and conditions as are deemed appropriate in the premises . Persons awarded contracts pursuant to this section shall be exempt from provisions of Section 8. 20. 160 of this chapter during the term thereof. (Ord. 1974 , 7 May 1975; Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) : 8 .20. 140 Transportation--Conveyance approval. No refuse . collector shall transport refuse in a conveyance that has not been approved by the director. All vehicles used in collect- ing and transporting refuse shall be provided with metal bodies so constructed as to be leakproof and to prevent loss , spillage or blowing away of any contents collected or trans- ported within the city . Such vehicles shall be thoroughly cleaned daily to eliminate odors and decayed materials . (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20. 150 Disposal methods . No refuse collector or other person shall dispose of refuse, except by one of the following methods : (a) By burying refuse in a sanitary landfill that is designed, operated and equipped in accordance with regula- tions set forth by the board of supervisors of Orange County; (b ) By burning refuse in an incinerator of a type approved by the director; (c ) Any person may dispose of refuse from premises owned, occupied or used by such person in a manner approved by the director and consistent with the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20 . 160 Disposal--Certificate required when. No person shall remove , transport or dispose of refuse. without a certificate of public need and necessity as granted by the .cite council under the provisions of this code, provided 208 '.�.. 20. 170--8.20. 200 y that. this section shall apply to no person lawfully dispos- ing of refuse from his own residence or .business establish- ment. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord: 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 170 Certificate--Application--Filing. An applica- tion for a certificate shall be filed with. the city clerk. . Each application shall be accompanied by a nonrefundable fee in the amount of fifty dollars . (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : .\/Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 180 Certificate--Application--Contents. The appli- cation shall be in writing and verified, and shall contain the following information: (A) The. name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural person; or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorpora- tion, address and telephone number of its principal place of business , and the names of its principal officers, togeth- er with their respective residence and business telephone numbers ; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated company, the names of the partners or of the persons compris- ing such association or company, and the business and resi- dence of each partner; (B) The schedule of rates proposed to be charged for such service; (C) The volume or extent of the service proposed to be provided; (D) The application .shall contain such additional in- formation as the council may require. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .190 Certificate--Application--Transmitted to de- partments . Upon receipt of the application for a certifi- cate , the city clerk shall send a copy of the application to the city administrator, the department of building and safe- ty, - planning department, police department and department of public works for report to the city administrator con- cerning the need and necessity for such service. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 .200 Certificate--Granting. A certificate shall . be granted by the .city council upon a finding that the public need and necessity requires the operation or provision of the service proposed by applicant , and that the experience , back- ground, capitalization and equipment is such that applicant is likely to comply with all laws and is likely to provide services in a manner which will reasonably satisfy the needs of the area proposed to be served. In the event that the number of applicants shall exceed the number of certificates required by public need and necessity, . the city council 209 8 . 20. 210--8 . 20. 240 M, shall grant the required certificate or certificates to the applicant or applicants it deems best suited under the stan- dards set forth in this section. (Ord. . 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 210 Other licenses and permits . The granting of a certificate pursuant to this chapter shall not relieve any person. of his duty to obtain licenses and permits required by other chapters of this code , nor from complying with any ordinance of this city or law of this state. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . F 8. 20 . 220 Certificate--Council hearing. Upon receipt of the application for a certificate, the city clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the city council at the next meeting at which it is possible for the matter to be heard, provided such public hearing shall be not less than thirty days after the application is filed. The clerk shall give the applicant written notice of the time , date and place of hearing at least ten days prior to the hearing unless such notice is waived by applicant in writing. The applicant, as well as any person connected therewith, shall answer all questions propounded at the hearing by or on behalf of any member of the. city council. (Ord. 1788 (part) , 1972 : Ord. 1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20 . 230 Certificate--Council action. After hearing, �.�► the city council may grant the certificate to the full ex- tent requested, deny the application, or grant a_ portion of the application, and may impose any conditions on the grant- ing of such certificate , or on the exercise of the privi- leges thereby granted, as the city council deems necessary for the protection of the public health and safety and for the general welfare of the residents of the city. The de- cision of the city council granting in whole or in part any certificate shall be by resolution, and any such deci- sion or a decision to deny the application shall be final. (Ord. 1788 (part), 1972 : Ord. -1688 (part) , 1971) . 8. 20. 240 Certificate--Revocation. Any certificate may be suspended or revoked by the city council or addition- al conditions may be imposed upon any certificate holder, after notice to certificate holder and hearing, for the fol- lowing reasons : (A) Failure to provide the service efficiently for which the certificate was issued; (B) Failure to comply with applicable laws , ordinances or regulations or with the reasonable instructions or direc- tions of the director; (C) . Failure to secure and maintain in effect the insur- ance required by this chapter; ter► 210 8 . _, . 250--8. 2O . 26o (d) Failure to acquire any permit required by this code or to pay any license fee required by this code ; (e ) Failure to keep structures, equipment or vehicles in a safe , sanitary, lawful and operable condition at all times ; (f) Failure to comply with any condition imposed as provided hereunder. (Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) 8.20. 250 Liability insurance . The applicant shall file with the city clerk, prior to the issuance of any certificate, and thereafter keep in full force and effect , a_ certificate of insurance, issued by an insurance carrier authorized to do business in the state, insuring the public against any loss or damage that may result to any person or persons or property from the operation of such service and naming the city as an additional insured, provided that the minimum •liability limits shall be as follows : (a) Combined single limit bodily injury and/or property damage, including products liability, $1,000 ,000 aggregate; '(b ) Additional Insured Endorsement . The insured agrees that the city of Huntington Beach, and/or members of the Huntington Beach city council, and/or all city council-appointed groups , committees , commissions , boards and any other city council-appointed body, and/or elective and appointive offi- cers , servants or employees of the city, when acting as such are additional assureds hereunder. (c ) Hold Harmless Agreement . The insured agrees to pro- tect , defend, indemnify and save harmless the city against loss , damage or expense by reason of any suits , claims , demands, judgments and causes of action caused by insured, his employees, agents or any subcontractor arising out of or in consequence of the performance of all operations covered by this certificate . Such certificate shall provide that any policy required hereunder cannot be cancelled without thirty days ' written notice to the director. (Ord. 1882, 12/73; Ord. 1788, 11/72; Ord. 1688, 12/71) . 8 . 20 .260 Violation--Penalty. (a) Any person who vio- lates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or by imprisonment not exceeding six months , or by both. Each day of the existence of any continuing violation shall constitute a separate offense . (b ) The provisions of this chapter shall be enforced by the department of public works of the city. (Ord. 1788, 11/72 ; Ord. 1688, 12/71) 211 8 . 24. 010--8 . 24. j0 , 1 Chapter 8 .24 DUST--INDUSTRIAL WASTE Sections • 8 .24 . 010 Industrial waste defined. 8 .24. 020 Prohibited when nuisance . 8. 24 .030 Escape of smoke, carbon and soot . 8 .24. 040 Abatement--Owner notification. 8 . 24. 050 Abatement--Notice direction. 8 .24 . 060 Abatement--Notice--Service . 8 . 24 . 070 Abatement--Failure. 8. 24. 080 Abatement--Notice of city intention. 8.24. 090 Abatement--Hearing request . . 8. 24 . 100 Abatement--Refusal--Misdemeanor. 8 . 24 .110 Provisions nonexclusive . 8 .24 . 010 Industrial waste defined. "Industrial waste" means any and all liquid or solid waste substance in sewage from any processing or manufacturing of whatever nature . (Ord. 1091, 10/64) 8 . 24. 020 Prohibited when nuisance. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to permit, maintain, or create a situation wherein the dust, smoke, soot, carbon or indus- trial waste on any property, under his, her or its control, creates a public nuisance . (Ord. 1253, 9/66; Ord. 1091, 10/64 ) . 8.24 . 030 Escape of smoke, carbon and soot . No person shall cause , permit or allow smoke, carbon or soot from any fire being operated, used, maintained or fired by such per- son to escape from any smokestack, chimney, flue, vent, fire- box, kiln or furnace . (Ord. 1253, 9/66) . 8. 24. 040 Abatement--Owner Notification. Whenever there exists in any place within the city a public nuisance, as defined by Section 1. 04. 010 (f) of 'this code, created by . industrial waste or dust, a health officer, police officer or the city attorney shall notify in writing the record owner or person having control or possession of such place or premises to abate such nuisance . (Ord. 1935, 10/74; Ord. 1253, 9/66; Ord. 1091, 10/64 ) . 8. 24. 050 Abatement--Notice direction. The notice shall direct the owner or person in control or possession of the place or premises , within the time specified in said notice, to abate the nuisance and to perform any and all work neces- sary to prevent the recurrence thereof in the places or prem- ises specified in the notice . (Ord. 1091, 10/64) � 212 /alv Na I - - -- - - - - 1� I _ I I CITY DISPOSAL SERVICE P. 0. BOX 495 �+��,�;.� i YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA 92686 (714) 528-7948 C.7 d �� qa �. ��s s � � v, i6o � x � � zol � I � /`'7"' �' USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY-PRESS FIRMLY CASH RECEIPT • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 711 . HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 (714)536-5511 CITY TREASURER—WARREN G. HALL DEPT. ISSUING v DATE RECEIVED FROM - ADDRESS C� o TL FOR Lool AMOUNT RECEIVED CASH Cl CHECK®� pp-�� A.B.A.# O,OV RECEIVED B ACCOUNT AMOUNT , TOTAL SO•d)_ NO. 51379 CUSTOMER J'A ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To City Clerk From Joh ehrens, Director Buil 1 g 8_ Community Development Subject Application for Certification Date October 20, . 1976 of Public Need and Necessity— City Disposal Service Co. This department has no official comment to make on the subject application since the subject does not really relate to our normal functions. However, I would generally agree with the comments of the Public Works Department. JFB/vl CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To H. E. Hartge From Michael Zambory Subject Application for Certification Date October 19, 1976 of Public Need and Necessity-- City Disposal Service Co. The City Disposal Service Co. is owned by *Edward and Cipriano Hernandez doing business as "City Disposal Service Co. " They have applied for a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity from the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to Section 8 .20.190 of the Municipal Code to collect commercial refuse. While checking the application, I discovered that City Disposal Service Co. has been doing business since 1962. Their application further states that they have. contracts in the cities of Yorba Linda and Garden Grove. I telephoned both Yorba Linda and Garden Grove to determine the reputation of the City Disposal Service Co. Both cities agreed they have a responsible attitude toward their work and that they -cooperate fully with problems involving complaints. They only collect commercial refuse. They do not collect residential refuse in either of the cities. The City Disposal Service Co. has applied to our city for the collection. of commercial refuse. I see no reason why their request for a certificate should not be granted. XMichael Zambo City Enginee� MZ:jy J- CITY OF HUNT1 MACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HONTINCTON BEACH - To City Clerk From Joh hrens, Director Buil g & Community Development Subject Application for Certification Date October 20, . 1976 of Public Need and Necessity-- City Disposal Service Co. This department has no official comment to make on the subject application since the subject does not really relate to our normal functions. However, I would generally agree with the comments of the Public Works Department. JFB/vl i f �,, MIALIFORNIA REFUSE REMOVAL COUNCIL Address:Member. of National Solid Wastes Management Association Southern District Mailing • 1 Box 182 0 San , . . CA 92402 'Il Sacramento Office Senator Hotel, Suite.229 - 231, 12th and L Streets 0 Sacramento, CA 95814 * (916) 441-4888 RC',*EI / 1l President AQ PILED P CHARLES JOHNSTON 4;�K V-) 1976 Riviera Rubbish Service February 24, 1976 �� 7651 Serapis Road Pico Rivera Calif 90660 Phone (213) 695 1610 TO MEMBERS OF THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CITIES First Vice President AL AVOIAN The recent League of Cities Legislative Bulletin #8-1976 of Torrance California February 13, 1976 misrepresents the facts as regards AB 1938 Second Vice President Knox through innuendo and colorful language BILL MAKRDICHIAN Montebello California Permit us to put one misconception to rest The bill does Secretary not affect a firm that has a contract or franchise CLIVE GLASSEY Crestlme California The bulletin states "the bill gives a local garbage firm a Immediate Past President state mandated five year franchise to continue - whether or ED BURR not that company has expended even one cent on capital invest- La Mesa California ment relating to its local operations " We remind you that the operator must have been in business at Executive Secretary least three years and must be in substantial compliance with HY WEITZMAN the terms of his license or permit before he is eligible od Professional Plaza 3972 No Waterman Avenue Ninety-nine percent of the operators in the state in business 3972 N Suite106 three years or more have had to invest great amounts of capital San Bernardino Calif 92404 on trucks, yards, equipment and machinery to build their businesses Phone (714) 885 8900 and to keep them operating (714) 883 8701 For years Solid Waste firms operating under an annual permit or license from a city or county, without any contractual agreement other than a license or permit, have had their businesses taken from them and have had no recourse The League bulletin states that the California Refuse Removal Council believes cities are treating them unfairly That is ridiculous The council considers that the present law, Section 35005 of the Government Code, is deficient and should be repealed It grants a three year extension in case of annexation or incorporation We are asking that there be a five year period for the purpose of investment recovery and business adjustment Once a man is put out of the solid waste business today, there are very few areas available, if any, for him to start again AB 1938 takes in cases other than annexation or incorporation and thus remedies another deficiency in the present legislation I AB 1938 is clear, firm, equitable and in the finest American tradition of encouraging private enterprise to invest substantial sums of capital . We respectfully urge you to express your support of the bill . Very t�ru1 yours, Al Avoian, Los Angeles President, Southern District Anthony J. Petri , Salinas President, Northern. District 0 v � ,a y AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JANUARY 26, 1976 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1975-76 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1938 Introduced by Assemblyman Knox April 17, 1975 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES AND LAND USE An act to add Chapter 21. (commencing with Section.4270) to Part 2 of Division 5 of the Health..and Safety Code and to ( repeal Section 35005 of the Government Code;'relating to solid waste. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1938, as amended; Knox .(Res: & L.U.). Solid waste: enterprises. Under existing law,a city,in an annexation or incorporation of an area, is required to permit,.persons operating under county franchises, licenses, or permits for refuse collection and disposal services to continue such services for 3 years if the service meets quality and frequency of service in other areas of the city. This bill would repeal such existing law at4: The bill would al require any county, city and county, city, or special district pew or authorizing a or providing fior exclusive solid waste . :=r to pre-Ade e4e ;ts4ye a61W 9+a9te Handling services on any existing service route.of air wise, to permit any solid waste enterprise, which has been previously engaged for more than 3 years in providing services on the route pursuant to a franchise, contract, license, or permit from the local agency that does not provide for exclusive solid 2 1938 15 14 AB 1938 —2— waste handling service, to continue to provide such services for not less than 7 6years if (1) there is substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of the authpriieing agreement amd franchise, contract, license, or permit, (2) quality and frequency standards of service required by the local agency in other areas not served by the enterprise are met, Wjd (3) the rates charged have been reviewed and set by the local agency in its customary and usual manner. The bill would provide. that.. no appropriation would be made nor obligation created for the reimbursement of local governmental agencies for any costs incurred.by them under the bill for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: Re.state €wing yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows., 1 SECTION. 1. Section 35005=of the Government Code 2 is repealed. 3, SEC. 2. Chapter 2.7 (commencing with Section 4 4270) is added to Part 2 of Division 5 of the Health and 5 Safety Code, to.read: 6 7 CHAPTER 2.1. SOLID WASTE ENTERPRISES 8 9 4270. Unless the context ootherwise requires, the 10 following definitions shall govern the construction of this 11 chapter: 12 (a) "Exclusive solid waste handling services" rzeans 13 any, action by a. local _agency,. whether by franchise, 14 . contract, license,. permit,. .or :otherwise; 'whereby the. 15 agency itself. or , one or more other. designated local 16 agencies or designated solid waste enterprises shall have 17 the exclusive right .to. :provide .solid waste Handling } 18 services of any class or type within all or any.part of the 19 territory of the local agency. 20 (b) "Local agency" means. any county, city and 21 county, city, or special district.having power.to provide 22 solid waste handling services either by the agency itself 23 or by authorizing or permitting other local agencies or 2 1938 30 17 :.1W —3= AB 1938 " 1 solid waste enterprises to provide solid waste handling 2 services. 3 J* "Seryiee reete=' means the ettstemers of and tie 4 Petite on whieh a seW waste enterprise provides these 5 eestemers vAtb se W waste be�tdhng se vices on a regular 6 basis perseant to eral er wren agreement with these 7 'ettstemers atnd iPt aeeerdgnee with anyr nose; 8 eentraet,Ijeense,or permik thereto fete granted,made,eg 9 wed by ftny leea4 3` 10 {d} (c) "Solid waste" means all putrescible and 11. nonputrescible solid and semisolid wastes, including 12 garbage, trash, refuse, paper, rubbish, ashes, industrial 13 wastes, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned 14 vehicles and`parts thereof,discarded home and industrial 15 appliances, manure, vegetable or. animal solid or .16 semisolid wastes, and other discarded solid and semisolid 17 wastes. 18 {e} (d) "Solid waste enterprise" .means any 19 individual, partnership, joint venture, unincorporated 20 private organization, or private corporation' regularly 21 engaged in the business of providing solid waste handling 22 services. 23 {�} (e) ``Solid waste handling services" means the 24 collection, transportation, storage, transfer, or processing 25 of solid wastes for residential, commercial, institutional, 26 or industrial users or customers. 27 4271. The Legislature finds and deelaies as follows: 28 (a) Provision for , adequate solid waste handling 29 services. is a public purpose` and is vital to -the public 30 health, safety,and welfare of1he inhabitants of the state. 31 (b) Although local agencies are ei"npowered to furnish 32 those services, in extensive parts of the state solid waste 33 enterprises are furnishing all. or substantial portions of 34 necessary solid waste.handling services. 35 (c) It is in the public,interest.and for a public purpose 36 to foster and encourage solid"waste enterprises so that, at 37 all times, there will continue to be competent enterprises 38 willing and financially able to furnish needed solid waste 39 handling services. 40 4272. If any local agency authorizes or provides for 2 1938 45 20 L AB 1938 —4- 1 exclusive solid waste .handling services on any existing 2 service route of a solid waste enterprise, the local agency 3 shall permit Oke ea�erprise any solid waste enterprise, 4 which has been previously engaged for more than three 5 years in providing solid waste handling services on the 6 existing service route pursuant to a franchise, contract, 7 license, or permit from the local agency that does not 8 provide for exclusive solid waste handling services, to 9 continue to engage in the business of providing those 10 services previously provided for a period of not less than 11 seven .five years after the:authorization or .provision for 12 e*eItt ive seW waste ladling serytiees;provided,that the 13 seryiees of Owt cerise., 14 {a+ Are iff sub9taet4al 6emplianee with *e terms grid 15 eenk ie,ns of aMY frattehise, eentreet, heengio, ev permit 16 made;grated;er i9sued to the cerise by 17 arm leea1 agettey, aid 18 +19+ Meet the qoahiy and €requeney of se�v�ees 19 re uiTed by the leeal agency its ether areas 4 the leeal 20 ageney served by eke eme�prise:exclusive solid waste 21 handling services, provided that. 22 (a) The services-of the enterprise (1) are in-substantial 23 compliance with the terms and conditions of any such 24 franchise, contract, license, or permit, and(2) meet the 25 quality and frequency of services required by the local 26 agency in other areas not served by the enterprise. 27 (b) The rates charged by the enterprise have been 28 reviewed and set by the local agency in its customary and 29 usual manner. 30 However, when a local agency authorizes or provides 31 exclusive solid waste handling services on an existing 32 service route under this chapter;it may not authorize a 33 solid waste enterprise without an exclusive`solid -waste 34 handling services franchise,,contract,'license, or permit .35 to expand its business on. the existing service route.. 36 4273. Any local agency or solid .waste handling 37 enterprise may contract, upon :.mutually satisfactory 38 terms, for the termination .of all or any part of the 39 business of the enterprise prior to the expiration of the 40 period specified in Section 4272. 2 IM8 50 21 -5— AB 1938 1 SP& � g Seetion 994 of the 2 Revenue and Trametian Gem there AA be no 3 re imbursement persiient to A&seetion eer 964 there by 4 aril apprepriatiee made by"aet for amy eests inearred 5 by lewd under the eet- 6 SEC.3. . Notwithstanding' Section 2231 of the 7 Revenue and. Taxation Code, there shall be no 8 reimbursement pursuant to:that section nor shall there 9 be any appropriation made by this act because the duties, 10 obligations or responsibilities imposed on local 11 government by this act are minor in nature and will not 12 place any financial burden on local government. , O 2 1938 55 22 'ILI [77: HIPNI1NGTON KA(H T1, E, HUNIINf,TOh'BfACl1 Flew Rubbish: Col lection Schedule Effective JULY 14 I City Limits 'C 1 -ONE Pickup Day L_ --Gty Limits Each Week C `.\ FRIDAY �%.—City Limits WED� a' \ Talbert Q► , ,o N i w d0 G, �Ellis i— ff -:. V � —City Limits o - THURSDAY , In a move to save the community$180,000 annually the Huntington Beach City Council is changing rubbish collection from twice weekly to '�, Adams one pickup each week. The new schedule is to start July 14. Each day of the week Rainbow Disposal Co.trucks will pick up trash in one... a, part of the city. Holidays will set the schedule beckons day which would be made MONDAY on Saturday so the regular schedule would resume the following week q For instance,if may is a holiday and drivers do not pick up trash, 4 rubbish would be picked up in that area on Tuesday,the Tuesday route .� would be covered on Wednesday,the Thursday route on Friday and the Frida route on Saturday. Regular scheduling would resume on Monday. Monday pickup service will be for an area in southeast Huntington Beach east of Bea Boulevard and south of Adams Avenue.The centerline of the street determines the bound Tuesday service will be for an area enclosed by Golden West Street on the west From the '\ northern city limits south to Talbert Avenue,south of Talbert Avenue west to Springdale Stree , south to Ellis Avenue,east to Edwards Street and south to Pacific Coast Highway.On the highway the area line goes out to Lake Street,north to Ellis Avenue and east to the city limits.The line goes north and west along the city limits to complete the service area. Wednesday service is in an area between Springdale Street on the west and Golden West Street on the east.The city limit forms the north border and Talbert Avenue the southern. Thursday the trucks will pick up in an area east of Lake Street,south of Ellis and Garfield Avenues to the city limits along the Santa Ana #er,north of Adams Avenue to Beach Boulevard and south to Pacific Coast Highway. Friday area is east of the city limits and west of Springdale Street with the northern city limits and the southern city limits along Los os as the north and south Borden. The new service starts July 14 and residents are urged to put rubbish containers out early and to put them away promptly following pickup. Call 847-MlS for additional information,if needed. PIO 7/75 fiU.?i PIG,i 1"N :rYA -LIF. James E Bradley. 1.7432- Forbes Lane r ;f=i; 31 _NI 3U 7 Huntington B"each,• CA 92649 December,'29 1.975 . The-Honorable Mayor. and City Council Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 926.49 Messrs': A group of concerned- citizens of the city of Huntington Beach would like to bring before the City Council the "issue of once/. weekly refuse collection versus twice/weekly refuse collection.. We would like to bring -this before the City -Council at the January 5, -1976 ..C-ity," Council- meeting. Our.: presentation should !lot- require more than fifteen or twenty minutes. - I Would* Iike to-thank you for considering .our request.- and "hope that ..you will grant us the opportunity to speak• before the. City% Council. Respectful ly-.yours, ?James E. Bradley James E. Bradley 04 17432 Forbes Lane Huntington Beach, CA a 92649 City Clerks Office P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 r, Attention: Connie Brockway lwfidavitiof Plication f r 3 State of California County of Orange ss City of Huntington -Be__.. ..- George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not ! //-- 3 devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any 0/ particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or �,L o any number thereof. ,�' G^e?eOL c� L The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court bbiished Huntin�gton Bea ch News Sept. of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. I zo 1973�x�trrfYi I F NOTICE 61F�.'V.�.�U,BL'IC"H EAR ING APP lc �n�for Certif�ca a ofl' i That the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING i,,tPu6hc�NegdryandNecossilicty NOTICEIIS)HERE8Y.G�IVEN,t,that apub= to hearing III, be held�by�the City Council oll the Citylof Huntington4B soh', Of which.the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- in the='Council1X'Chamber' of fthe' Civ c Center•; aiuntf&ton, Beacf9,v-a the hour of 7 00 P�M *orSas.fsoon ,thereafter has One issue possible ,on Monday the`'15tha"°d'ay�-tdt paper at least Oetoberrs1973 'fpr-fhei;-purpose oti cnn- s�denng33an'appliaatton i,7 r �Cert7f�eft'C o - ^' P�.and Noce,i flle'd by commencing from the 2 0 t h day of Se m e mb e r yam, g y / Costa Mesa Disposal Company 29Q•1 arvcEr-rcne, esa aG�oi a, to day of operate 'a`commerciai--refuse collection 19 and ending on the 2 th y September business in th'e"-._C,itY pyrsuant to Se ton % 3111.14.E of the Huntington Bea}h ,Ord'i=.1' 'nance..Code. - 1 ' 19�—, both days inclusive, and as often during said period and All interested persons' are'invited ito`t times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the attend said-:hearing• ;and' express Aheirl opinions fork or against said app'licaiion-1 regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a Further informativ. on may obtainedl supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following from the office of the^City'Clerk._ dates, to-wit: DATED_: 9%4-/73'• CITY OF HUNTINGTOWSE'ACH Sept. 20 , 1973 l3yc1'1Alicia M.-wentworth., . City-Clerk Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 218 t day of September 192_1—.00 Notary Public Orange County, California THOMAS D..WYLLIE Notary Public-California Orange County • My Commission Expires September 14, 1974 Hsi: glop Boa W' County, `of fain e .g State "of: California Af fidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk �. SE R � sT CITY bF HUNTI GTO BEACH Ghief Robitaill To policeDepartment Date Qr21r�3 Please find attached a copy of an application for Certificate -of Pub't it Need Ar NPepasq tv tn nperatA a comnesrcial refuse collection business in the City- filed by Carta Mesa Disposal Co _ Please submit g �rp=nVr to,khp cry Adminfatrator--=ursuaat to S 3111 .-3 of the HROC _ attar-hpd e DUPLICATE Signed e ` Date Signed Redif9rin _ 45 465 SEND PARTS I AND 3-WITH CARBONS INTACT. , :. Poly Pak iSO sets)4P465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. . SERIACtit_. WEST CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH To -City Administrator Date 9/11/73 Pleaap•f nd Akraehed a copy of an apolication for a Certificate of Public Need & Necessity filed by Costa Mesa "Disposal Company - Copies of said appli- cation have been sent to the Dept of Bldg & Safety Planning Dept. - -Police, Dept & DPW with-,a request to submit -a-report to:=your officer S . 3 IV.3 IC160C DUPLICATE Signed City Clerk Date Signed ` Redif9rm — 4S 1 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. Poly Pak(50 sets)4P465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. - . . 5E� 'iCE'�� QUEST CITY' :O -HUNTINGTOM BEACH H. E.. Mmtge, A r t��n� ppir t ' frs To ppa ^� pN+h1'ic.o€ I'ulic W-orks Date" ��3 j73 Please ¢iad--atCached a eo}�To s,n arzlicetjsos` far- e Certificiu e'e f Puhliic Need & Necpr4gtytn'ntketate a ad-commercial refui§6:`collection hiaineaa A n ch-L, City, f t l by -t'.nata iNEa.--a n n Anrt<4a 1 t`rstr�=an:�T�7 oABe silbmLC vepOXt_ to the City-Mministrator. paxsnant to S. 3111,14.3 of t$e t ©C -. attached:, ®UPLICATE Signed Glty Cleft Date Signed Redif?nil _ 4S 465- .i SEND PARTS 1-AND .WITH CARBONS INTACT. Poly Pak(50 sets)4P465 - PART$WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. CM OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 4zi �rca/ 0-Dept. Bld$ & Community Develo=entDate . 9 f-A173 vteasy find ate�ched a coy of an ap licstioa for Qbvf- pirate nf. Ptth13.uppd '& Nprpasit;. to Operate a �cou��nercial refuse' collection business in the City- filed by Costa Mesa Disposal i0impany - Please submit a report the City Administrator pursuant to S 3111 14 3 of the HBOC:—.lv�ff • DUPLICATE Signed City Clerk p c•� a: Date. Signed Redifirm' 4S 465 - SEND PARTS LAND 3,WITH CARBONS INTACT. - - - „ Poly Pak(50 sets)4P465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. _ '. c9CaR.Yo+ i`00eyR— JUEST - - my bF HUNTI-NG a O SEA CH Ken Reynolds, Planning Director To Planning De�rtment Date 9111.173 'Please '£indttached a corTof an agTlialtfon for Certificate of Public Need & Necessity to operate P. a commerciatrefuse collection business in the City., filed by Costa Mesa Dis,pQsal Co. Pleame submit a report to the City Administrator. _ purguant hn S 3111 .14 3 of the HBOC- a&" DUPLICATE qSigned City„Clerk Date Signed ReZffrm 4S 465 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3-WITH CARBONS INTACT. Poly Pak 150ssts1'4P465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. - - lyj[J SERVICE REST PLANNING-DEPT.. . CITY OF HUNtINGTON .BEACH Ken Reynolds, Planning Director To Planning Department Date 9/11/73 Please find attached a copes of an appliction for Certificate of Public Need & Necessity to operate a commercial refuse collection business. in the City, :; filed by Costa Mesa.Disposal Co.---- Please submit:a report to the City Administrator - pursuant to S.3111.14. 3 of the HBOC. - attached r . PLEASE REPLY TO Signed City- Clerk 912/7z The'.- Planning Department has no comments or -recommendations "to make on this. i application. K.A. .'`Reynolds- f i s . Date Signed Redif?. 4S. 465 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. -- PelyPakISO sets)4P465 PART-3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. = _ - SERVICE REQUEST CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH To Dept. Bldg. & Community DevelopmentPate 9/11/73 .. Please find attached a copy of an application for a Certificate' of Public Need & Necessity' to operate a commercial refuse collection business in the City, filed by Costa Mesa' Disposal Company - Please submit a reporttl to the City Administrator pursuant to S.3111.14.3 of the HBOC. = attached -. PLEASE REPLY.TO — Signed s. d City Clerk We have no information that would have any bearing on this matter. 1 J D SEP 1.41973 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE I Dare Sep'teinber 12, 1973 Signed Dick Jones I Rbdif�rm Assistant Ditg Bldg. �+ 45 465 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. Poly Pak(50 sets)4P465 PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. - r y � Costa Mesa Disposal Company 2991 Grace Lane Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626 Phone: (714) 557-0977 GQ.P1 September 4 1973 ao Honorable City Council and City Clerk /NC* P. O. Box 190 �� (� 73 Huntington Beach, California 92648 IV Ca Subject: License for Rubbish Removal Service �p�v Dear Sirs: Thank you for this opportunity and thank you for the time you have extended to us, reviewing our application. We want to bring our service to your City. If we are granted a license by your group, we will work hard within your City. We will always be honest and fair with the citizen in the Huntington Beach Area. Our aim is to treat the people right and to make an honest living for ourselves. We have no other aim in mind whatsoever. William F. Valov is the owner of our company here in Costa Mesa. Fte'w i I I also be the sole owner of the company we hope to form within your City. He is 32 years of age. His phone number is (213) 448-2258. Residence: '2012 Seaman, S.E1 Monte. As your City has requested in the forms given to us, we will give the rates we intend to charge. The rates below are a maximum charge. Large sites;-such as large industrial buildings, apartments or shopping centers where several containers are required, the rates will be less according to how many bins are needed. No. of Days Serviced Per Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 yard bin 15.00 19.00 24.00 30.00 35.00 39.00 Rate 1-1/2 yard bin 11.00 16.00 2 0.00 2 4.00 29.00 v3$:00 Per 155galIon barrels 4.00 6.00 8..00 10.00 12.00 14.00 Month Thank you very much and we sure hope you allow us a,-permit to haul within your City. Sincerely yours, tl�l�tti.a ;7;•\jJ William F. Valov WFV:hj S. 3111.14.7 SANITATION HEALTH S. 3111.14.7 Action -of Council. After hearing, the City Council may grant the certif- icate to, the full extent requested, deny the application, or grant a portion of the application, and may impose -any conditions on the granting of such cer- tificate, or on the exercise of the privileges thereby granted, as the City Council deems '.necessary for the protection of the public health and safety and for the general welfare of the residents of the City of Huntington Beach. The decision of the City Council granting in whole or in part any certificate shall be by resolution, and any such decision and a decision to deny the application shall be final. S. 3111.14.8 Revocation of Certificate. Any certificate may be suspended or revoked by the City Council or additional conditions may be imposed upon any certificate holder, after notice to certificate holder and hearing, for the following reasons: (a) Failure to provide the service efficiently for which the certificate was issued. (b) . Failure to comply with applicable laws, ordinances, or regulations or with the . reasonable instructions or directions of the Director. - (c) Failure to secure and maintain in effect the insurance required by this chapter. (d) Failure to acquire any permit required by this code or to pay any license fee required by this code. (e) Failure to keep structures, equipment or vehicles in a safe, sanitary, lawful, and operable condition at all times. (f) Failure to comply with any condition imposed as provided hereunder. S. 3111.14.9 Liability Insurance. The applicant shall file with the City Clerk, prior to the issuance of any certificate, and thereafter keep in full force and effect, a certificate of insurance, issued by an insurance carrier authorized to do business In the State of California, insuring the public against any loss or damage that may result to any person or persons or property from the operation of such service and naming the city as an additional insured, provided that the minimum liability limits shall be as reasonably prescribed by the Director. Such certificate shall provide that any policy required hereunder cannot be cancelled xbithout thirty (30) days written notice to the Director. S . 3111.15 Penalty. Enforcement. Any person who violates any provision of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be. punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both. Each day of the existence of any continuing violation shall constitute a separate offense. The provisions of this article shall be enforced by the Department of Public Works of the City of Huntington Beach. S. 3111.16 Severability. It is the intention of the City Council that this article, and every provision thereof, or amendment thereof, shall be considered severable, and the invalidity of any provisions or portion of this article, or amendment thereof, shall not affect the validity of any other provision or portion or amendment thereof. HEALTH SANITATION S. 3111.14 S. 3111.14 Necessity For Certificate. No person shall remove, transport or dis- pose of refuse without a certificate of public need and necessity as granted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach under the provisions of this code, provided that this section shall not apply to any -person lawfully disposing of refuse from his own residence or business establishment.. S. 3111.14.1 Application. Filing. An application for a certificate shall be filed with the City Clerk. Each application shall be accompanied by a non- refundable fee in the amount of fifty dollars. S 3111.14.2 Application. Contents. The application shall be in writing and veri- fied, and shall contain the following information: (a) The name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural person; or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorporation, address and telephone number of its principal place of business, and the names of its principal officers, together with their respective residence and business telephone numbers; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated com- pany, the names of the partners or of the persons comprising such association or company, and the business and residence of each partner. (b) The schedule of rates proposed to be charged for such service. (c) The volume or extent of the service proposed to be provided. (d) The application shall contain such additional information as the Council may require. S. 3111.14.3 Report From Departments. Upon receipt of the application for a cer- tif-icate, the City Clerk shall send a copy of the application to the City Administrator, the Department of Building and Safety, Planning Department, Police Department and Department of Public Works for report to the City Administrator concerning the need and necessity for such service. S. .3111.14.4 Granting of Certificate. A certificate shall be granted by the City Council upon a finding that the public need and necessity requires the operation or provision of the service proposed by applicant, and that the experience, background, capitalization, and equipment is such that applicant is likely to comply with all laws and is likely to provide services in a manner which will reasonably satisfy the needs of the area proposed to be served. In the event that the number of applicants shall exceed the number of certificates required by public need and necessity, the City Council shall grant the required certificate or certificates to the applicant or applicants it deems best suited under the stan- dards set forth in this section. S. 3111.14.5 Other Licenses and Permits. The granting of a certificate pursuant to this chapter shall not relieve any person of his duty to obtain li- censes and permits required by other chapters of this code, nor from complying with any ordinance of this city or law of this state. ` S. 3111.14.6 Procedure For Granting Certificate. Upon receipt of the application Jfor a certificate, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public C hearing before the City Council at the next meeting at which it is possible for the matter to be heard, provided such public hearing shall be not less than thirty (30) days after the application is filed. The Clerk shall give the applicant written notice of the time, date and place of hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the hear- ing unless such notice is waived by applicant in writing. The applicant, as well as any person connected therewith, shall answer all questions propounded at said hearing by or on behalf of any member of the City Council. Publish 9/20/73 Postcards 0 NOTICE -OF PUBLIC HEARING Application For 1 Certificate of Public Need and Necessity NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on MQnday the 15th day of octohgr , 19_2.�_, for the purpose of considering an application for Certificate of Public Need and Necessity filed . by Costa Mesa Disposal Company, 2991 Grace Lane, Costa Mesa, California, to operate a commercial refuse collection business in the City.. pursuant to Section 3111. 14.6 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said ��Fi;ra �o:�• Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. DATED: 9/11173 CITY OF- HUNTINGTON BEACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk _3 . APPLICATION FOR LICENSE City ®f HuritlingtoxiBeacli LICENSE DEPT: P.O. BOX 190 SIXTH & PECAN STREETS ttl 11vr.triv111n(n HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 Tel. 1714) 536.5267 A(,1?J ~ � 73 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT FORM LICENSE D-Pr aYBUSINESS NAME: C c:>--�AMeSA -I XUSINESS ADDRESS: ��) i &ZA C-e- �--AfQ e— (�rLl afeIe. No. S J� -1 09-7 MAILING ADDRESS-. Cd'."4A Me-SAkc-1r-QSAL` 20%C l Gi1r�C.� {mow C/l.� Tele. No. SS "1—i3S"7 9 TYPE OF BUSINESS: n_ ["11J113 �1 J?12AA,.JIJ41L— ViC��C c�.µ1�• �.2t (;AL- State of California Contractor/Professional License No. State of California Board of Equalization Permit (EA) No. Health Department Inspection Permit No. This business is: D?Individual ❑ Partnership ❑ Corporation List of Owners) or Officers of Corp.: k JL, Ik AIo,,/ Atatement of average number of employees to be used in this city: O'Date that you will start business in this city: =^1 1. C r'wS e— ctl�'�Number of vehicles used in this city to conduct your business with a manufacturer's rated capacity of: (Under 1 Ton) (1-3 Tons) (Over 3 Tons) LOCAL BUSINESS ONLY: (Also Complete Reverse Side) No. Rental Units: (Apts., Mgtel/Hotel, Rooms, Trailer Spaces) Rental Equipment (Give No.) ,Passenger Autos ; Trucks ; Trailers (2-Whl) (4-Whl) Number of coin operated machines on premises: Music Vending Amusement Service Machine Owner Name/Address: I HEREBY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT: Sicj;=fftu re: ✓� � e 73 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Classification of Business Fee: Date Application Submitted: Processed by: Certificate of OCCupancy Filed: Issued: License No. Licensing Period: TO REMARKS: ZONING VERIFICATION FOR A HOME OCCUPATION ONLY 1, have read and understand all Subject: the provisions for the operation of a home occupation as delineated in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and agree to comply with said provisions. Also, I agree to grant permission for inspection by a City official at any reasonable time, if given reasonable notice for such Zone: SDM: inspection. ❑APPROVED El DISAPPROVED Applicant's signature Date Planning Department signature Date NAME: 1, L lk 1 N M (First) (Middle) (Last) (Female - Maiden Name) HOME ADDRESS: 7.O �ZC� n►.� f'�Vc? So •EI-�'`�''�� �1—'PHONE34-1-�F5` ��-S�S (Number/Street/City-Zip) BIRTHRATE: NCA • 5 Icf_i{Z BIRTHPLACE: �-- (Mo. Day Year) (City/State/Zip) HEIGHT: Ft. l0 In. WEIGHT: V i 5 EYES: HAIR: ,SI RIj SOCIAL SECURITY NO. SqA- S6-- 1 S ` 5 CALIF. DRIVER'S LICENSE NO.: 4CC EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER TO BE CONTACTED IN CASE OF FIRE, ACCIDENT OR EMERGENCY: HOME: 213 -ZZS OTHER: 9 t, ��`� r;t/ DATE: ., �' '�-3 (Signature of Applicant) NAME: (First) (Middle) (Last) (Female- Maiden Name) HOME ADDRESS: PHONE: (Number/Street/city-zip) BIRTHDATE: BIRTHPLACE: (Mo. Day Year) (City/State/Zip) HEIGHT: Ft. In. WEIGHT: EYES: HAIR: SOCIAL SECURITY NO. CALIF. DRIVER'S LICENSE NO.: EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER TO BE CONTACTED IN CASE OF FIRE, ACCIDENT OR EMERGENCY: HOME: OTHER: DATE: Signature of Applicant) l i NAME: (First) (Middle) (Last) (Female - Maiden Name) I HOME ADDRESS: PHONE: (Number/Street/City-Z ip) BIRTHDATE: BIRTHPLACE: (Mo. Day Year) (City/State/Zip) HEIGHT: Ft. In. WEIGHT: EYES: HAIR: SOCIAL SECURITY NO. CALIF. DRIVER'S LICENSE NO.: EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER TO BE CONTACTED IN CASE OF FIRE, ACCIDENT OR EMERGENCY: HOME: OTHER: DATE: (Signature of Applicant) y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,.. INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To DAVID D. ROWLANDS From EARLE W. ROBITAILLE City Adm in istrat ion Chief of Police Subject CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED & NECESSITY Date 9/19/73 COSTA MESA DISPOSAL COMPANY Attached is information from Vice/Intelligence unit on the above request for license for rubbish removal service. Based on information available, we can find no reason to petition against the issuance of a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity at this time. . /fl cc: Lt. Rinehart Recommendation: Approved:_ Disapproved: ` 1 �---, City Administrator CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To EARLE W. ROBITAILLE From R. L. RINEHART/G. VEINE CHIEF OF POLICE VICE/INTELLIGENCE UNIT Subject COSTA MESA 'DISPOSAL COMPANY, Date SEPTEMBER 19, 1973 2991 GRACE LANEi -COSTA "MESA; CALIF. PHONE 'NUMBER: '557-0977 On September .11, 1973, received a request from the City Clerk's office, City of Huntington Beach, to conduct an investigation of the COSTA MESA DISPOSAL COMPANY, located at 2991 Grace Lane, Costa Mesa, California, phone number: 557-0977, and the owner, Mr. William F. VALOV, who currently is submitting an application for a license to do business in the City of Huntington Beach as the COSTA MESA DISPOSAL COMPANY. Officers learned that in 1962, in Bakersfield, California, Mr. William Fred VALOV was arrested for being drunk and paid a fine of $21.00. Officers also learned that in March of 1964, again in Bakersfield, a warrant was issued for Mr. William Fred VALOV for failure to provide; and in August of 1964, this failure to provide warrant was dismissed. Officers have checked local files and have also checked the surrounding police departments and Sheriff's office record files and have found no derogatory information regarding Mr. William F. VALOV and his current disposal company, COSTA MESA DISPOSAL COMPANY. At the present time, there is only one rubbish disposal company operating within our city, RAINBOW DISPOSAL COMPANY. The Police Department has received no complaints concerning a lack of service by this company. It is unknown whether the addition of a second company would create any operational problems or is in fact warranted based on public need, however, we can find no reason to petition against the issuance of a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity at this time. RLR;GV:csk i ZAQI HTB. DDL. N 110 DDL 9-12-73 1706 . HTB HUNTINGTON BEACH PD REQUEST P QTO A_ND COPY CALIFORNIA LIC NBR J494149 REFER DET/VEIN-VICE DETAIL HTB HUNTI NGTON -BEACH PD EL ZAQIHT3.GII . N 109 CII 9- 12-73 1700 HTB HUNT INGTON, BEACH PD REQUEST RECORD WANTS ON , WILLIAM VALOV - M/W 5-10 195 BRN/BLU DOB. 4. lej;TU5-42;s :,llRlVZRS LIG-•iJ4841491 SOC' SEC 5.W 56 1545 REFER DET/VE•INE—VICE DETAIL HTB HUNTINGTON BEACH PD EL 00191 ACK HTB 00275 ' 091273 2200 c. =- ICI 1 ..HT3._P.D HUNTINGTON BEACH H. ATTN DET VEI NE VICE -DETAIL - - - 9-12-73 2120 PST RE UR 109 HTB DATE VALOV MAY BE SAME AS WI LIAR? FRED V CII 224059 /2 1 - -42 SO BAKERSFIELD 105197 DRK 11-29-62 $21 FN PD 1 -64 SO BAKESrIELD 105197 FAIL TO PROV WARR 0000�99074 9-19-64 DISM No WANTS B OFI COMMAND CENTER RLH PJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HIiNTIN JON S M:H To Administration From D. W. Kiser Subject Costa Mesa Disposal Company Date September 20, 1973 ' The application by the subject company to obtain a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity and license to operate has been researched by the undersigned, and the following comments are submitted for consideration. 1. The License Department should be placed on the routing for comment in as much as they have the records for the numbers of similar businesses -within the city. 2. The basic Public Need and Necessity is definitely present, however there are presently fourteen companies in this same business within the city. Two of the group, Rainbow and Dewey have or had Certificates of Public Need. . It is understood Dewey recently rel nquii ed his certificate and negotiated ane_area•►t*rade"with Rainbow. •oa .• V . 3. The other twelve operate under a license without a Certificate even though-Sectionc°3111.14 `so'°required: 4. In as much as the City basic service contract is with Rainbow, the other firms compete for special service, commercial, and industrial service; and with fourteen firms in competition it is felt that there will be a definite business risk to the new applicant. 5.. A copy of the License Departments ' list is attached for your information. i. is Donald W. Kiser Division Engineer DWK:el I i� i` is T R A S H P I C K - U P Lici--nsed ' (Certif. Need & Necessity) Rainbow Disposal Paul Lomeno 17121 Nichols St. , HB y Dewey's Rubbish Service Harry Otting, Pres. 2113 Canyon Dr. , C. M. Tract Clean-up: Pacific Refuse Disposal Jaycox Park Disposal Great Western Reclamation Haul-Away Orange County Waste Paper Western Refuse Hauling Bel-Art Paper Stock United Paper ,Stock Co. , Inc. (Pennysaver excess) . Pioneer Paper Stock (Montgomery Wards) A-1 Trash Box Service Inc. A B C Cleaning Co, T R A S H P I C K - U P Licensed (Certif. Need d Necessity) Rainbow Disposal Paul Lomeno 17121 Nichols St. , HB ' �De�ey-'-s—R-b-b+s°hServ=ice ;Harr-y—Ott�-�---p�P_� -1=1 3=C Tract Clean-up: Pacific Refuse Disposal Jaycox Park Disposal Great Western Reclamation Haul-Away Orange County Waste Paper Western Refuse Hauling Bel-Art Paper Stock United Paper Stock Co. , Inc. (Pennysaver excess) Pioneer Paper Stock (Montgomery Wards) A-1 Trash Box Service Inc. A B C Cleaning Co. ORIGINAL COPY for i./laster File % ; PMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 0 CiTY CLERK The City of Huntington Beach and Phil Hohnstein and Paul Loumena d/b/a Rainbow Disposal Company hereby mutually agree to amend their agreement of March 4 , 1968 as . follows : 1 . Paragraph 8 shall be amended to provide that City shall pay to Company for service rendered under the terms of the agreement a fee of $1. 825 per month per single family, multi-family, commer- cial or industrial unit receiving only the basic level of service . 2 . Paragraph 9 of said agreement under Maximum Resi- dential Unit Rates shall be amended to read as follows : Basic Level of Service $1 . 825/month 3 . Paragraph 2 is amended to read "and ending February 28, 1976" instead of February 2.8, 1973 • 4 . . The following terms and conditions are added to said agreement . A. The rates , as amended, are to continue in effect until February 28 , 1974 . B . The City retains the option to reduce residen- tial pickup service to one pickup per week at a charge not "to, exceed $1.62 per month. .5. That all other terms of the agreement of March 4 , 1968 are to remain in full force and effect . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Huntington Beach has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its Mayor pRo TE and attested by its City Clerk thereto authorized, and Phil -1- Hohnstein and Paul Loumena have hereunto set their hands , on the day, month and year appearing below . Dated : , 1971 CITY nP HUNTINGTON BEACH A mun c pal corp ation BY y or YRO Trz m 01 ATTEST : City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City AttorneIy;,,,,, Dated. 1971. r RAINBOW DISPOSAL COMPANY Phil Hohnstein P 1 Loum -2- ORIGINAL COPY for Maser File A G R E E M E NID"UST U_.�, �F TO CITY. CLERK THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 4n day of March 1968 BETWEEN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to a,s "CITY'► AND PHIL HOHNSTEIN and PAUL LOUMENA, co-partners, doing business under the fictitious firm name of RAINBOW DISPOSAL COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "COMPANY" WHEREAS, COMPANY is presently collecting, removing and disposing of trash, rubbish and ga,rba,ge within the CITY; and., WHEREAS, it is the intention of the parties hereto to extend the said services; now, W I T N E S S E T H: That for and in consideration of the mutual promises, agreements and covenants herein contained, to be done and per- formed by the parties hereto, the parties do hereby agree as follows: 1. That agreement between the CITY and COMPANY dated October 10, 1962 for the collection, removal and disposal of trash, rubbish and garbage is cancelled and. terminated. 2. That COMPANY is hereby given the right and privi- lege for a, period of f ive (5) years, commencing March 1, 196 8 and ending February 28 , 19 73 , of collecting, - l - removing and disposing of refuse as defined in Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, within the City of Huntington Beach, as the boundaries now exist, or may here- after be altered, and the disposal of such refuse at any COMPANY dump or transfer station dump unless otherwise provided for. 3. The COMPANY shall cause to be collected, removed. and disposed of, the normal amount of refuse generated by a single family residential dwelling unit which shall be defined as a monthly average of two refuse containers per pickup and the normal amount of plant clippings and. trimmings generated by a single family residential unit. Refuse containers as used herein to be as defined in Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The COMPANY shall maintain a, twice a week collection schedule except where holidays, as called out in this agreement, are concerned. The above-described level of refuse collection service shall be referred to as the "Basic Level of Service . " COMPANY shall be responsible for picking up plant prunings and trimmings that are bundled in lengths not in excess of four feet and that weigh no more than forty pounds . 4. COMPANY shall at all times during the term of this agreement keep and maintain, in good operating order, and in good appearance, sufficient trucks and other equipment to properly and adequately service the area, covered by this agree- ment. 5. Refuse collection shall not take place on the following holidays : January 1, New Year ' s Day Ma.v 30, Memorial Day July 4. Independence Day Labor Day Thanksgiving Day December 25, Christmas Day Service will resume on the next scheduled collection da,y following a holiday. 2 - 6. That a,ll work done hereunder by the COMPANY shall be done in such method and manner so as to conform with the pro- visions of Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code as the same now provides, or may be amended to provide, and COMPANY further agrees that in the disposal and handling of such refuse, they will comply with all City and County ordinances and State regulations pertaining thereto. 7. COMPANY agrees that upon removing refuse from receptacles it will replace said receptacles and replace the covers therewith; that it will not allow or cause any refuse to spill while handling the same, upon any public street or private property and will use proper care in the handling of said receptacles so as not to destroy or damage the same more than is reasonably necessary under proper handling of the same . 8. CITY shall pay to COMPANY for services rendered under the terms of this Agreement a $1.40 per month per single family, multi-family, commercial or industrial unit receiving only the basic level of service. The number of units receiving the basic level of service shall be determined by the number of units being billed for refuse collection by the Finance Depart- ment. Any payment due COMPANY for services rendered may be withheld by CITY for reasons of non-conformance of COMPANY with this agreement . 9. COMPANY shall not exceed the following schedule of maximum rates in providing refuse collection service to any party in CITY. Let it be recognized that the following schedule is NOT to be used as a guideline or a basic rate schedule, but merely as a maximum rate that can be charged. MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL UNIT RATES Basic Level of Service . . . . . . . . . . $1150/month First Residential Unit in�Excess of� Those which ca,n be Served. . . . . . . . . . . . by Basic Level of Service . . . . . . . . . . . .$1. 25/month Second Residential Unit in Excess of Those Which can be Served by the Basic Level of Service. . . ... . . . . . . 1.00/month Additional Units in Excess of Above. . . 1.00/month, each - 3 - MAXIMUM BIN RATES PER MONTH r Frequency 1 Sq. Yd. 2 Sq. Yd. 3 Sq. Yd. of Pickup Bin Bin Bin Once a week $10.00 $12.50 $15 .00 Twice a, week 15.00 16.00 20 .00 Three times week 22.00 Six times a. week 35.00 10. COMPANY, or any partner, shall not sell, assign or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein or permit the same to be transferred by operation of law without first obtaining the consent of the Huntington Beach City Council. Any such unauthorized transfer shall allow the City, at its option., to terminate this Agreement . Until the adoption of any. ordinance by the City Council, COMPANY may sell or otherwise dispose of refuse materials after the same has been collected. 11. COMPANY shall, at all times, during the life of this Agreement, keep on file with CITY a bond in the sum of 4 50,000.00 to the effect that COMPANY will faithfully perfoim its contract and comply with all of the ordinances of the CITY relating to the care, control, collection and disposal of garbage, refuse, filth and trash. 12. COMPANY agrees that for the purpose of transport- ing any refuse under this contract, it will provide, maintain . and use at all times mentioned herein, trucks suitable in size, which trucks shall be equipped with a, metal body and be provided with a, cover which shall sufficiently and amply cover the contents of said trucks, and said covers shall be so arranged at all times while said trucks are upon the public highways, alleys or any public place, so as to cover any filled portion of said trucks and shall be so arranged and kept that during actual collections of refuse there shall be sufficient opening for placing said refuse in said trucks, but that no more of the refuse in said trucks shall be uncovered than shall be necessary for such pur- pose, and at any time while transporting refuse upon the public streets while not actually collecting refuse from receptacles, - 4 - the entire contents of said trucks` sha,ll be covered. 13. COMPANY shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, abide by all rules, regulations and statutes of the State of California respecting the employment of labor tinder this contract, and shall keep in full force and effect adequate Workmens ' Compensation on its employees. 14. COMPANY shall keep in full force and effect during the life of this Agreement a policy of public liability and property da.ma.ge insurance, in the amount of $100,000.00/ $300,000.00 and $50,000 .00, and in which policy CITY shall be named as an additional insured and COMPANY shall furnish CITY written evidence of said policy or policies . Said policy shall contain a provision that it may not be cancelled without thirty (30) days prior notice to CITY. 15 . CITY reserves the right to cancel this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to COMPANY in the event that COMPANY shall be in default in any of the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, or in the event that COMPANY shall fail to comply and abide by all of the requirements and provisions of Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, as the same now exists, or ma,y hereafter be amended. Upon such default, CITY shall have the exclusive right to rent and operate any or all trucks, trailers, tractors, bulldozers and other equipment used by COMPANY in the performance of the work specified in this Agreement . Such rental shall be upon a reasonable basis until other arrangements can be made by the CITY and the rental of garbage or refuse trucks shall be at the rate of $20.00 per day per truck. Any moneys due COMPANY for rental may be withheld by CITY and used for the purpose of paying any payments due or outstanding liens unpaid upon said equipment. _ 5 _ 16. This contract is and shall be subject to all Federal, State, County and Municipal laws and particularly Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code as it now reads, or may be amended. Any discrepancy between the laws mentioned above and this contract shall render the contract void only as to said discrepancy and shall not void the entire contract. 17. In the event of a substantial increase in the costs of COMPANY which will make it necessary for COMPANY to request an increase in rates, the parties agree that by mutual agreement this agreement ma,y be amended. In the event of any disagreement between the parties as to the rights and duties of the parties under this contract or the ordinance�of the CITY, the parties agree to a,rbitra,te the matter with each party selecting one person to a.rbitra,te and if they cannot agree, the two a,rbitra,tors .shall select a, third person whose decision shall be final. 18. In the event any disagreement arises between any resident of CITY and the COMPANY, concerning the cost of service by COMPANY, CITY shall have the right, after hearing the . matter, to establish the rate which shall be charged and such decision shall be final . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation Mayor ATTEST nCITY" City Clerk j PHIL HOI-INSTEIN \PAUL LOUMENA PHIL HOHNSTEIN and PAUL LOUP•IiKA, co-partners, doing business under the fictitious firm name of RAINBOW DISPOSAL COMPANY - "COMPANY" J Cliff.OE SwITINGTON BEACH •• HEALTH DIVISION 3 DIVISION 3 HEALTH Chapter 31. SANITATION 32. Repealed (Ord. No. 1788 - 11/72) 33. FOOD 34. WATER DEPARTMENT 35. SANITATION DEPARTMENT 36. MISCELLANEOUS HEALTH. SANITATION S. 3110 CHAPTER 31 SANITATION ARTICLE 311. REFUSE 312. FLY CONTROL & ABATEMENT 313. DUST & INDUSTRIAL WASTE 314. WASTE WATER 315. WATER POLLUTION REGULATIONS ARTICLE 311 REFUSE (77, 250, 909, 925, 1688, 1788 - 11/72) S— 3110 DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply in the interpre- tation and enforcement of these regulations: (a) Refuse includes both garbage and rubbish (b) Garbage means all putrescible solid wastes, including but not limited to vege- table matter, animal offal, and carcasses of small animals, discarded food containers, . leaves, cuttings, trimming from trees, shrubs, and grass, excluding human excretment and animal manure. W. Rubbish means all non-putrescible solid wastes, including but not limited to special handling items such as trees, tree limbs, logs, automobile bodies, motor vehicle parts, building materials, appliances, household goods, sod and. dirt, metal, wood, and rock. (d) Solid Wastes means all putrescible and non-putrescible solid or semi-solid wastes including semi-liquid or wet wastes with insufficient moisture and other liquid contents to be free flowing. (e) Director means the Huntington Beach Director of Public Works or his authorized representative. (f) Person means any individual, firm, governmental unit, organization, partnership, corporation, company, or other entity. (g) Refuse Collector means any person who picks up, removes, transports or disposes of refuse, other than one who does so from his own premises. (h) Basic Level of Service means that level of collection and disposal service necessary to collect refuse generated by an average family in one single-family residence, as specifically provided in any given contract between the city and any person for collection of such refuse, or as provided by resolution of the City Council. Refuse items or substances excluded from collection by regulation of the Director .or by contract, as hereinafter provided; refuse capable thereof which has not been placed in containers or bundles within the weight and size limits hereinafter- set forth for containers or bundles, any unit of refuse which exceeds four feet in length or which exceeds forty pounds in weight, and any amount of refuse in excess of that provided. by such contract or such resolution as that generated by an average family in one single-family residence, are hereby excluded from the "basic level of service." I S. 3110(i) 00 SANITATION Aft HEALTH (i) Collection means pickup, removal, transportation, or disposition of refuse, except by a person with refuse from premises owned, occupied, or used by such person, as hereinafter provided. (j) Single-Family Residence means and includes every lot in the city upon which is situated one dwelling unit designed for or used as living quarters by human beings. It shall not include any lot upon which there is located any hotel, motel, lodge, hall, club, tourist camp, trailer camp, church, business or industrial establishment, or any lot containing more than one dwelling unit or any lot upon which any commercial or indus- trial activity is conducted unless such activity is conducted in a single-family residence. (k) Nonsingle-Family Residence means and includes all locations specifically excluded from subsection (j) . (1) City Refuse Collector means any collector either employed by or under contract with the City of Huntington Beach to provide removal, transportation, and disposition of refuse from residents and users of premises within the said city. S. 3111 LEAVING REFUSE IN PUBLIC PLACES. No person shall deposit, sweep, throw, discard or leave any refuse or cause such refuse to be deposited, swept, placed, thrown, discarded or left upon any public street, highway, alley, sidewalk, street parking or other public place in this city. S. 3111.1 Occupant To Keep Premises Clean. Every person occupying, using, or controlling any premises shall keep said premises in a clean and sanitary condition, and no person shall permit any sewer effluent, excrement, slop or stagnant water, butcher offal, market refuse, garbage, dead animal, or any other noxious or . offensive matter of any kind, or any other substance that may become offensive, to be deposited or to remain thereon except as otherwise provided by law. S. 3111.2 Accumulation of Refuse. No person occupying, using, or controlling any premises shall permit any refuse to accumulate thereon, nor shall any such person maintain any accumulation of refuse thereon, unless in either event the same is stored in a manner approved by the Director or by law. S. 3111.3 Refuse Storage. (a) Garbage shall be stored in a container of a type approved by the Director. Every such container shall be constructed of metal, or equally durable material, in such a manner as to be strong, watertight, not easily corrodible, fly proof, and rodent proof. Such container shall have handles or other attachments designed for and capable of lifting, and shall have covers which shall be kept in place at all times, except when garbage or other refuse is being deposited or removed from such container. Such cover when in place shall fit so as to render fly proof any covered container. A sufficient number of containers shall be provided to hold at least one week's accumulation of garbage. Each garbage container shall be kept clean so that no odor or other nuisance will exist. Containers for single-family residences shall have a capacity not to exceed thirty-two gallons and shall not weigh more than sixty pounds when filled. (b) Rubbish shall be stored in such a manner that it will not provide harborage to rats, nor cause a .fire hazard. HEALTH SANITATION S. 3111.3(c) (c) Equally durable nonmetallic containers may include but shall not be. ,limited to heavy plastic or "wet-strength" kraft paper throwaway refuse bags of a te approved by the Director. Such bags shall comply with all of the requirements of subsections (a) and (b) except for the requirements of handles and covers. (d) Tree trimmings and other similar matter shall be tied in bundles measuring not more than four feet long and weighing not more than forty pounds. S. 3111.4 Location of Refuse Containers. (a) Each refuse container and any accumulation of refuse which is for collection, shall be kept or placed in such a manner as not to be visible from the public street except during or for the time fixed for the collection thereof. During such period, any containers or any accumulation of refuse which is for collection, shall be placed as follows: (1) Near Alley. On the premises, within five feet of the rear property line, where there is a through alley in the rear of the premises. (2) Access from Side Entrance. On the premises at an accessible point adjacent to any side entrance thereto where no through alley exists. (3) At Curb. At the curb in front of the premises, where no through alley nor side entrance exists. (b) No refuse container nor any accumulation of refuse which is for collection, shall be placed for collection in any public way, or at any curb or in any location visible from a public street, prior to 6:00 p.m. on the day preceding collection; any such refuse container shall be removed within two hours after collection, and in no case later than 10:00 p.m. on the day of collection. S. 3111.5 Interference With Refuse. No person except the owner thereof, his agent or employee, a duly authorized city employee, or any employee of the refuse collection contractor, shall interfere in any manner with any refuse container, or any accumulation or refuse which is for collection, nor shall any per- son remove such container or accumulation from the location where it shall have been placed by the owner, his agent, or his employee. S. 3111.E Improper Substances In Container. No person shall place or cause or permit to be placed in any refuse container any substance or material other than refuse as defined in this article. Large items included in the definition of rubbish, exceeding four feet in length or forty pounds in weight, shall not be placed in refuse containers. Persons wishing to dispose of such large rubbish items shall inform either the Department of Public Works or the refuse collection contractor and make special arrangements to have said items removed. The refuse collection con- tractor may levy a charge for removal of such items under a schedule and formula to be uniformly applied, based on weight and size of the items, which formula and schedule shall have been approved by the Director. S. 3111.7 Refuse Collection. The owner, occupant, tenant or lessee of any pre- mises shall remove, or cause to be removed, all garbage from said pre- mises at least once a week. The city refuse collector shall remove from the premises all refuse which has been placed for collection, which refuse is of a type and in an amount provided by contract with the city. Any removal of refuse by the city refuse collector, any refuse collector, or any person, shall be performed in a neat,. orderly and quiet fashion, without causing damage to the container or the 'lid. Any spilled matter shall be picked up by the person responsible for the spillage, and the premises shall be left in a clean and orderly condition. -S. 3111.8 SANITATION HEALTH Refuse shall be the property of the collector thereof from the time of pickup to the time of disposal. S. 3111.8 Refuse Collection. Single-Family Residence. The city, or some person under contract with the .city to do so, shall operate and maintain a service for the collection of refuse from single-family residences in the city, on a regularly scheduled basis approved by resolution of the City Council, not less fre- quently than once each. week. The Director may by regulation exclude from such service any item or substance deemed hazardous, obnoxious, or otherwise inappropriate for such service. All refuse - included in the basic level of service, which is generated, accumulated, and lawfully placed for .collection at any single-family residence in the city, shall be collected exclusively by the city refuse collector. \ S. 3111.9 Refuse Collection. Other Premises. Any premises other than single- family residences may at the option of the owner or occupant thereof use the collection service operated by the city refuse collector, as hereinbefore--pro- vided, for refuse not excluded from the basic level of service. S. 3111.10 Excluded Refuse. The owner or occupant of each and every premises lin the city which generates refuse excluded from the basic level of service, and the owner or occupant of premises other than a single-family residence who has chosen not to use the collection service operated by the city refuse collector for refuse generated on said premises, shall contract for the collection of all such refuse with some lawful refuse collector in .the city; such excluded refuse may also be removed and disposed of by such owner or occupant in a manner approved by the Director and . consistent with the provisions of this article. S. 3111.11 City Collection Contract. The city may enter into a contract with some responsible person to provide a basic level of service for the collection of refuse in the city at the times and in the manner prescribed in said contract. The term of such contract shall not exceed five years. After advertising for bids thereon, such contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and qualified bidder. Such contract may exclude the collection of any item or substance deemed by the Director to be inappropriate for collection. Such contract shall be entered only with a person holding a certificate of public need and necessity. S. 3111.12 , Refuse Transportation. No refuse collector shall transport refuse in a conveyance that has not been approved by, the Director. All vehicles used in collecting and transporting refuse shall be provided with metal bodies so constructed as to be leak proof and to prevent loss, spillage, or blow away of any contents collected or transported within the city. Such vehicles shall be thoroughly cleaned daily to eliminate odors and decayed materials. S. 3111.13 Refuse Disposal. No refuse collector or other person-shall dispose of refuse, except by one of the following methods: (a) By burying refuse in a sanitary landfill that is designed, operated and equipped in accordance with regulations set forth by the Board of Supervisors or Orange County- (b) By burning refuse in an incinerator of a type approved by the Director. (c) Any person may dispose of refuse from premises owned, occupied, or used by such person in a manner approved by the Director and consistent with the provisions of this article: r NOVI 11 ALTH SANITATION S. 3111.14 S. 3111.14 Necessity For Certificate. No p rs-bn shal remove, transport or dis- pose"of refuse without a certif cate of blic need and necessity as granted by the City Council of the City of ntin-3ton each under the provisions of this code, provided that this section shall pply toe person lawfully disposing of refuse from his own residence or business establishment. S. 3111.14.1 Application. Filing. An application. for a certificate shall be filed with the City Clerk. Each application shall be accompanied by a non- refundable fee in the amount of fifty dollars. S. 3111.14.2 Application. Contents. The application. shall be in writing and veri- fied, and shall contain the following information: (a) The name, age, business and residence addresses and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural person; or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorporation, address and telephone number of its principal place of business, and the names of its principal officers, together with their respective residence and business telephone numbers; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated com- pany, the names of the partners or of the persons comprising such association or. company, and the business and residence of each partner. (b) The schedule of rates proposed to be/charged for such service. (c) The volume or extent of the service/proposed to be provided. (d) The application shall contain such additional information as the Council may require. S. 3111.14.3 Report From Departments. Upon receipt of the application for a cer- tificate, the City Clerk shall send a copy of the application to the City Administrator, the Department of Building and Safety, Planning Department, Police Department and Department of Public Works for report to the City Administrator concerning the need and necessity for such service. S. 3111.14.4 Granting of Certificate. A certificate shall be granted by the City Council upon a finding that the public need and necessity requires the operation or provision of the service proposed by applicant, and that the experience, background, capitalization, and equipment is such that applicant is likely to comply with all laws and is likely to provide services in a manner which will reasonably satisfy the needs of the area proposed to be served. In the event that the number of applicants shall exceed the number of certificates required by public need and necessity, the City Council shall grant the required certificate . or certificates to the applicant or applicants it deems best suited under the stan- dards set forth in this section. S. 3111.14.5 Other Licenses and Permits. The granting of a certificate pursuant to this chapter shall not relieve any person of his duty to obtain li- censes and permits required by other chapters of this code, nor from complying with any ordinance of this city or law of this state. JS. 3111.14.6 Procedure For Granting Certificate. Upon receipt of the application for a certificate, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council at the next meeting at which it is possible for the matter to be heard, provided such public hearing shall be not less than thirty � (30) days after the application is filed. The Clerk shall give the applicant written notice of the time, date and place of hearing at least ten (10) days prior to the hear- ing unless such notice is waived by applicant in writing. The applicant, as well. as any person connected therewith, shall answer all questions propounded at said hearing by or on behalf of any member of the City Council. S. 3111.14.7 SANITATION HEALTH S. 3111.14.7 Action of Council. After hearing, the City Council may grant the certif- icate to the full extent requested, deny the application, or grant a. portion of the application, and may impose any conditions on the granting of such- cer- tificate, or on the exercise of the privileges thereby granted, as the City Council deems necessary for the protection of the public health ,and safety and for the general welfare of the residents of the City of Huntington Beach. . The decision of the City Council granting in whole or in part any certificate shall be by resolution, and. any such decision and a decision to deny the application shall be final. S. 3111.14.8 Revocation of Certificate. Any certificate may be suspended or revoked by the City Council or additional conditions may be imposed upon any certificate holder, after notice to certificate holder and hearing, for the following reasons: (a) Failure to provide the service efficiently for which the certificate was issued. (b) Failure to comply with applicable laws, ordinances, or regulations or with the reasonable instructions or directions of the Director. (c) Failure to secure and maintain in effect the insurance required by this chapter. (d) Failure to acquire any permit required by this code or to pay any license fee required by this code. (e) Failure to keep structures, equipment or vehicles in a safe, sanitary, lawful, and operable condition at all times: (f) Failure to comply with any condition imposed as provided hereunder. S. 3111.14.9 Liability Insurance. The applicant shall file with the City Clerk, prior to the issuance of any certificate, and thereafter keep in full force and effect, a certificate of insurance, issued by an insurance carrier authorized to do business in the State of California, insuring the public against any loss or damage that may result to any person or persons or property from the operation of .such service and naming the city as an additional insured, provided that the minimum liability limits shall be as reasonably prescribed by the Director. Such certificate shall provide that any policy required hereunder cannot be cancelled without thirty (30) days written notice to the Director. S. 3111.15 Penalty. Enforcement. Any person who violates any provision of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both. Each day of the existence of any continuing violation shall constitute a separate offense. The provisions of this article shall be enforced by the Department of Public Works of the City of Huntington Beach. S. 3111.16 Severability. It is the intention of the City Council that this article, and every provision thereof, or amendment thereof, shall be considered severable, and the invalidity of any provisions or portion of this article, or amendment thereof, shall not affect the validity of any other provision or portion or amendment thereof. IILAL,L'f I SANITATION ARTICLE 312 FLY CONTROL & ABATEMENT (1619-12/70) S . 3120 DEFINITIONS . The following words and phrases , whenever used in. his chapter, shall be construed as defined herein unless from the context a different meaning is intended and more partic- ularly directed to the use of such words and. phrases: (a) Fly-Breeding Hazard shall mean the accumulation, existence or main- tenance of any substance, matter, material, or condition resulting in the breeding of flies in an amount or manner as may endanger public health or safety, or which may create unreasonable inter- ference with the comfortable enjoyment of life and use of property by others . (b) Fly Abatement Board shall mean the administrative board. composed of five 5 members appointed by the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, pursuant to Orange County Ordinance Section 42.012 which is hereby designated as the Fly Abatement Board pursuant to this article . (c) Commercial Dairy Farm shall mean any place or premises on which milk is produced for sale, or other distribution, and where more than two (2) cows or six (6) goats are in location. (d ) Commercial Poultry Ranch shall mean any place or premises where poultry are maintained, raised or fed. for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale, or other distribution. (e) Horse Stable shall mean any location where three (3) or more horses are maintained for any purpose . S . 3121 PUBLIC NUISANCE. Any fly-breed.ing hazard in the City of Huntington Beach is hereby declared to constitute a public nuisance . S . 3122 INSPECTION BY HEALTH OFFICER. It shall be the duty of the Health Officer of Orange - County, who is hereby designated to enforce this article, upon routine inspection, or whenever he is informed or has reasonable cause to believe that any land, building or collection of plant or animal waste, or any substance or existing con- dition on any lot, farm, or other land., or on any other premises as a fly-breeding hazard, to enter, after demand, upon such premises and to determine whether or not there is an existing fly-breeding hazard . The County Health Officer shall furnish each of his deputies and inspectors with identification in such form as he shall prescribe . 1 S . 3122. 1 FLY CONTROL & ABATE HEALTH 3122 . 1 Except as to residences and living quarters , the Health Officer, or his authorized deputies or inspectors., for the j)1ar-1)o:;e of routine inspection, or whenever he shall have reasonable t;r, belir�vc that any violation of th:i_s article exist., upon any prcrri_L. .;ec or in any place , after displaying, Identification may demand entry thereon ir, the daytime . Every person who owns , occupies or other- wise is then in possession of such premises and who, after such display and demand, refuses or willfully delays to open the same and admit an inspection thereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to punish- ment upon conviction thereof by a fine not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not over five (5) days or by both such fine and imprisonment. S . 3123 ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS . NOTICE. Whenever there exists in any place within the City of Huntington Beach, a fly-breed- ing hazard, the County Health Officer shall notify in writing, by personal service, the record owner, his agent, or person having control or posses- sion of such place or premises, to abate such nuisance and take correc- tive measures to prevent its recurrence, and. to appear at a public hearing to be held by the Fly Abatement Board on a date set forth in said notice . A copy of such notice shall also be posted in a conspicu- ous place upon such place or premises . Such hearing shall be set by the County Health Officer at least ten (10) days after the date of such notice . The notice shall specify what is claimed to be causing the hazard and what must be done to abate it, and shall direct the owner, or person in control or possession of the place or premises , to abate the nuisance, and to perform any and all work necessary to prevent the recurrence_ thereof in the places or premises specified in the notice, prior to the time set for the public hearing by the Fly Abatement Board, and shall advise such owner or person that in lieu of such abatement, if the Fly Abatement Board determines that a fly-breeding hazard still exists at the time of such public hearing, the County Health Officer will proceed to abate such nuisance, without further notice, unless such nuisance is abated before a date specified by the Board , and the owner of such place or premises , and. the person having control or possession thereof, jointly and severally shall be liable to the county for the total cost of such work, including all administrative costs, and. such costs shall constitute a charge and lien upon such place or premises . The notice shall be served upon the owner of record , or person having control or possession of the place or premises upon which the nuisance exists, or upon the agent of either. Notices may be served in the same manner as a summons in a civil action by any person authorized by the Health Officer of Orange County for such purposes . -HEALTH 4 ft & ABATEMENT � S . 3124 S . 3124 ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS . HEARING. At the time fixed for hearing by the Fly Abatement .Board, such Board shall hear and consider all relevant testimony and evidence offered by the owner of record., or person having control or possession of the place or pre- mises upon which the fly-breeding hazard is stated in such notice to exist by the County Health Officer or his agent, and by any other interested person. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the Board shall make the following findings: (a) Whether a fly-breeding hazard exists; (b) What is causing the hazard specifically; (c) What should be done by the owner or operator to abate the hazard; (d ) What work, if any, should be done by the owner or operator to pre- vent its recurrence; (e ) Whether the owner or operator shall comply with any specific re- gulations of the Health Officer; and (f) Whether the Health Officer shall abate and specifically what he may do at his option, including but not limited to directing the owner or person having control of the premises to abate said nuisance, provided that anything not included in the Board 's order shall not be done by the Health Officer. If the Board determines that such fly-breeding hazard exists, it shall direct the County Health Officer to abate it, without further notice, unless the condition is abated and such work performed by the owner or operator on or before a date to be specified by the Board . a . 3125 FLY-CONTROL STANDARDS . The Fly Abatement Board, upon recom- mendation of the Health Officer, is authorized to adopt fly- control standards for operation and design of commercial dairy farms, commercial poultry ranches and horse stables to serve as guidelines in the abatement proceedings described in Section 3124. All such standards shall be printed and made available to all dairymen, poultrymen and horse-stable owners or operators . S . 3126 COSTS . All costs shall constitute a charge and special assessment upon such parcel of land incurred by the city and/or county. If such costs are not paid within a period specifically set by the city and/or county, they shall then be declared a special assessment against that parcel as provided in Government Code Sections 25845 and 38773 .5 . Such special assessment shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and. the same procedures and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ordinary county taxes . The city shall retain the additional and independent right to recover its costs by way of civil action against the owner and person in possession or control, jointly or severally. 13 . 3127 FLY CONTROL & ABATE HEALTH UPI f I I I OT EXCLUDED. The provisions of this article ati ati added -.t.erlled,y Lo abat-'e the :arid riol. It, w.1.1.1i or don)p�.,0, 1t)ti (11' rr,lry ot'llor Lc _oru- or proceed iril-,r Or r..Urllcdle:� providod i).Y 1"I'W . S . 3128 ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT. Without limiting the power of city so to do, the County of Orange and all its officers , employees and agents are hereby authorized and empowered. to enforce and administer the provisions of this article within the City of Huntington Beach. S . 3128. 1 Penalty. Any owner or person having control of any place or premises upon which there is existing a breeding place for flies, who refuses or neglects to abate same or to take corrective measures to prevent its recurrence, in accordance with the written notice, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to punishment upon conviction thereof by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) or one hundred (100) days imprisonment in the county jail, or by both such fine and imprisonment . S . 3129 SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this article is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remain- ing portions of the article . The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby declares that it would have passed this article and. each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SANITATION S . 1 1 ARTICLE 3.13 DUST AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE s S . 3131 DEFINITION: INDUSTRIAL WASTE: Any and all liquid b,r solid waste substance ..in. sewage from any processing or manufactur- ing of whatever nature . S . 3132 It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to permit, maintain, or create a situation wherein the dust, smoke, soot, carbon or industrial waste on any property, under his, her or its control, creates a public nuisance . (1253) S . 3133 ESCAPE OF SMOKE CARBON SOOT. No person shall cause, permit or allow smoke, carbon, or soot from any fire being operated, used, maintained or fired by such person to escape from any smokestack, chimney, flue, vent, firebox, kiln or furnace . (1253) S . 3134 ABATEMENT PROCEDURE. (1253) S . 3134. 1 Whenever there exists in any place within the City of Huntington Beach a public nuisance created by industrial waste or dust, the Health Officer shall notify in writing the record owner or person having control or possession of such place or premises to abate such nuisance . S . 3134.2 The notice shall direct the owner or person in control or possession of the place or premises, within the time spec- ified in said notice, to abate the nuisance and to perform any and all work necessary to prevent the recurrence thereof in the places or pre- mises specified in the notice . S . 3134. 3 The notice shall be served upon the owner of record or person having control or possession of the place or premises upon which the nuisance exists, or upon the agent of either. S . 3134.4 Notices may be served by any person authorized by the Health Officer for such purpose in the same manner as a summons in a civil action. S . 3134.5 Upon the neglect or refusal of the owner, or person having control or possession of any place or premises to comply with the notice to abate, the Health Officer may abate such nuisance and the owner of such place or premises, or the person having control or possession thereof, shall be liable to the City of Huntington Beach for the costs of such abatement which may be recovered. in a civil. action. , r F I; S . 3134.6 SANITATION HEALTH S . 3134.6 In the event the Health Officer elects to abate ,any such nuisance, he shall serve or cause to be served upon -the record owner or the person in control or possession of the premises a "Notice of Intention to Abate" and if a hearing is not requested before the City Council as hereinafter provided. within ten (10) days after service of said "Notice of Intention to Abate, " the Health Officer may proceed to abate any such nuisance as hereinabove provided . S . 3134.7 The request for hearing shall be in writing and be filed with the City Clerk. Notice of the time and place where the City Council will consider the matter shall be mailed by the City Clerk to the applicant and to the Health Officer. At the time fixed for the hearing, the City Council shall hear and consider all relevant testimony and evidence relating to the matter as offered by the appli- cant and by the Health Officer. Upon the conclusion of the hearing the City Council shall determine whether or not a condition contrary to the provisions of this article exists and whether or not the Health Officer may abate . S . 3134.8 Any owner or person having control of any place or premises upon which there is a public nuisance created. by industrial waste or dust, who refuses or neglects to abate the same or to take correctivetmeasure to prevent its recurrence in accordance with the written notice from the Health Officer within the time specified in said notice, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to punish- ment upon conviction thereof by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) or one hundred (100) days imprisonment in the County Jail or by both such fine and. imprisonment. S . 3134.9 Provisions of this article in reference to abatement are to be construed. as an ad.d.ed remedy of abatement of the nuisance hereby declared and not in conflict or derogation of any other actions or proceedings or remedies otherwise provided by law. HEALTH SANITATION S . 3141 ARTICLE 314 WASTE WATER 1253) S . 3141 Definition - Waste Flowing Into Street. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, either as principal, agent, servant, employee, or otherwise, to cause or permit crude, dis- tilled or refined oil or petroleum, or water, waste water or mud, or any byproduct of any oil product on activity or any substance resulting from oil production activity, to become deposited upon or to flow upon, into or across any sidewalk, curb, alley or street or into any storm or sanitary drainage system, sewer or gutter. S . 3142 Oil Well Waste Water Permit: Clarifier. The Oil Field Superintendent may issue a permit to any person, firm or corporation to deposit water or wastewater into any storm or sanitary drainage system of this City, provided such water or waste water does not contain crude, distilled or refined petroleum or mud or any re- siduary products of petroleum or other substances mentioned in Section 5650 of the Fish and Game Code of the State of California and provided further that a clarification system approved by the Oil Field Superin- tendent is installed and properly maintained for the purpose of treat- ing said water, (1320) S . 3142.1 Application Fee. A verified application for such permit shall be filed with the Oil Field Superintendent, together with a fee of $5.00 per well for the use and benefit of this City, which said sum shall be retained by the City whether said application is granted or denied. (1320) S . 3142. 2 Contents of Application: Property Description. Said ap- plication shall contain a description of the property upon which said water or waste water is located. S . 3142.3 Property Owner: Discharge Point. The application shall contain the name of the owner of the property and shall designate the point where the water will be discharged into said drain- age system or sanitary sewer. S . 3142.4 Method of Clarifying. The application shall contain the method of clarifying and settling .the objectionable sub- stances from said water, including plans and specifications of waste water settling system. S , 3142. 5 Easements : Promise to Indemnify. If said waste water is to be conducted over private property belonging to persons* other than applicant, a statement that permission from the owner or owners of said property has been secured in writing together with an agreement on the part of the applicant to indemnify and hold harmless this City and its officers and employees form any liability accruing to this City, its officers or employees on account of the granting of said application. S . 3142.6 Permittee to Pay Costs . All costs incurred by the permittee and all damages to city property by reason of permittee con- necting to or closing out any of his connections to city property shall be at permittee 's sole cost and expense. S. 3143. SANITATION HEALTH• S . 3143 Hearing After Denial. In the event the Oil Field Superin- tendent denies the application for a permit for the dis- posal of waste water, the applicant may, within thirty (30) days there- after, upon request therefor, be granted a hearing before the Council, at which hearing the Council may take evidence for and against said permit and either grant or deny said application. (1320) S. 3144. Contents of Permit. The permit shall specify the location of the clarifying plant, type of plant to be used including plans and specifications approved by the Oil Field Superintendent. (1320) S . 3144.1 Discharge Point. The permit shall contain the location at which water will be discharged into the drainage system or sanitary sewer, the size of discharge pipe and method of discharge. S. 3145. Fee. The fee for said permit shall. be $30,00 per well per calendar year, payable annually, and becoming deliquent on the first day of February each year. Where permits are issued for the unexpired portion of the annual terny the amount of the permit fee required shall be prorated on a monthly basis. The minimum permit fee for an unexpired annual term shall not be less than two month's fee or $5.00 per well. (1320) S . 3145.1 Deposit of Fees.' All fees collected under this Article by the Director of Public Works or the Oil Field Super- intendent shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City. (1320) S . 3145.2 Penalty for Delinquency. If any fee herein required to be paid to the City is not paid at the time and in the manner herein provided, the same shall, thirty (30) days thereafter, automatically be and become delinquent, and a penalty in .an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of such fee shall be added thereto each month, but. not to exceed said yearly fee. (1320) S. 3146 Bond. The Director of Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent may require a bond from the applicant conditioned upon the faithful performance of the conditions of said permit including the indemnification from any and all liability on account of the issuance of said permit and for the. payment to the City of all fees required to be paid by the City under this Article and said bond shall be in such sum as the Director of Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent shall deem proper. (1320) S . 3147 Valve Gate. The discharge line shall have a valve gate, located at the point of discharge, capable of being locked. HEALTH. _ SANITATION S . 3141-02 S , 3147. 2 Rules For Laying.'-Drain Pipe to Sanitary Sewer. No sanitary sewer shall be_`opened. except 'by a liberi.ded...plumber and care must be taken that no cement pipe or` other material shall be used in making connections and shall- be of such a length that they do not extend over 4 inches into sewer "Y" of chimney, Trench from main sewer to property line to .be properly settled when bank-filled. Upon discontinum ance or cancellation the drainpipe shall be cut off at the property line . and the connection cemented off. S . 3147.3 Use 61 Storm Drains and Sanitary Sewers . No person form or corporat ion "shall' discharge or cause_ to be discharged: any sewage, waters, vapors or industrial wastes that have any one of the following characteristics ; 1. Any gasoline, benzene, naptha, fuel oil,. or other flammable or explosive liquid, solid. or gas, 2. Any ashes, cinders , sand, mud, straw, shavings , metal,. glass , rags, feathers , tar,- plastics , wood, paunch manure, or any other solid or viscous substance capable of causing obstruction to the flow in sewers or. other interference with the proper operation of the sewage . or storm drain works . 3 . Any industrial wastes containing a toxic or poisonous substance in sufficient quantity to injure or interfere with any sewage treatment process , constitute a hazard to humans or animals , or. create any hazard in the receiving waters of the sewage treatment plant. 4. Any noxious or malodorous gas or substance capable of creating a public nuisance. 5. Any liquid or vapor having a temperature higher than 850 F. unless properly treated for scale inhibition. 6 . Any industrial wastes which..may .contain more than .200 parts per millions , by weight, of fat, oil, or grease. (1320) . : S . 3148 Temporary Suspension of Permit. Upon the violation of ariy of `the terms of thevperm t, including the payment of any fee before deliquency, the Director of Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent may temporarily suspend the permit. . (1320) S . 3148.1 Citation of Show Cause. In such event, the Director of Public Works ' or -the' Oil Field Superintendent shall cite the permittee to appear before the City Council at its next meeting and show cause why his permit should not -be cancelled. (1320) S . 3148. 2 Citation Without Suspension. Without suspending such permit, the-'Dii°ector-of` Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent may cite -any permittee , to- show cause before the City Council why said permit should. not be cancelled. (1320) S . 3148.3 Hearing: Decision. At said hearing, the Council shall take evidence and-after said hearing shall decide the matter within three weeks . S . 1348.4 Action by Council. The Council may cancel,. suspend for a definite time;' or modify the terms of said permit. atuv.LTAT 1 UN HEALTH S . 3148.5 Transfer of Permit..: No permit issued hereunder shall be transferred except upon the .consent of the Director . of Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent. Application for such transfer shall be made upon forms prescribed by the Director of Public Works or the Oil Field Superintendent and shall be. accompanied by the application of the transferee for the issuance to -him of such permit. The application of the transferee shall contain all the information and be accompanied by all the required documents and all fees required of any applicant for an original permit under this Article, . (1320) S . 3148.6 Cancellation. The City Council reserves the right to. cancel any and all permits issued under this Article after notice and hearing when public necessity and convenience require such cancellation. Upon such cancellation the Council may order re- funded any unused portion of the fees paid by the permittee. Notice hereunder shall be given by mail addressed to the permittee. at the address shown on the permit at least ten days before the hearing. S . 3149, Special Industrial Waste Permit, The Director of Public Works may issue a special industrial waste permit to any person, firm or corporation to discharge industrial wastes into the storm and sanitary sewer systems of this City providing the character- istics of said industrial wastes do not exceed the limitations as in- dicated below: 1. Any liquid or vapor having . a temperature higher than 85oF unless properly treated for scale inhibition. 2. Any sewage or industrial wastes which may contain more than 200 parts per million, by weight, of fat, oil, or grease. 3 ,, Any sewage containing over 0;5 parts. per million• of dissolved sul- phides . 4� Any sewage or industrial wastes having a pH lower than 6.5 or higher than 9.0, or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures , equipment, and personnel of the sewage works . 5. Any sewage or industrial wastes containing .suspended solids of such character and quantity that unusual attention or expense is required to handle such materials in truck sewers or at thesewage treatment plant. S� 3149.1 Application Forms . Application forms for such special industrial waste permits shall be furnished by the Director of Public Works. S , 3149. 2 Application Fee, The application for a special industrial waste permit shall be accompanied by an application fee or $5.00, no part of which shall be re-turned .to the applicant. S � 3149.3 Fees for Special Industrial Waste Permit. The fee for the special industrial waste permit shall be $2. 50 per month for each 1200 barrels or fraction:-thereof of industrial waste discharged into the storm and sanitary sewer systems of this City. Said fee shall be paid monthly. S � 3149,4 For the purpose' of this ordinance, the water or waste water from the prodiiction 'of oil and gas wells in the City shall not be considered as an industrial waste requiring a permit under Section 3149. db HEALTH SANITATION S . 3150.1 ARTICLE 315 WATER POLLUTION REGULATIONS (1593- 70) S . 3150. 1 Enforcement and Administration. The County of Orange and all of its offices, emp ogees and . agents are hereby authorized and empowered to enforce and administer the provisions of this article within the City of Huntington Beach, California. S . 3150.2 Definitions . As used in this article unless the context otherwise requires: (a) Director means the duly-appointed administor appointed by the Board. of Supervisors of the County of Orange . (b) Department means any department of the City of Huntington Beach or the County of Orange . (c) Industrial Waste means any and. all liquid or solid waste substance, not sewage from any producing, manufacturing or processing opera- tion of whatever nature . It shall include sewage mixed with "industrial waste; " however, it shall not include domestic sewage from residences, business buildings and. institutions , containing only waste from waterclosets, wash water, baths and kitchens . (d ) Pollution of Under round or Surface Waters means any condition resulting from the depositing or discharging of industrial waste which impairs or contributes to the impairment of the usefulness of waters for human or animal consumption or domestic, agricultural, industrial, or recreational purposes, or any other useful purposes . (e) Public Agency means and includes the United States or any department or agency thereof, the State of California or any department or agency thereof, county, city, public corporation; municipal corpora- tion or public district. (f) Public Sewer means the main line sewer, publicly owned or maintained, constructed in a street, highway, alley, place or right-of-way dedicated to public use . (g) Sewage means any waste, liquid or otherwise, associated with human occupancy of buildings including sewage effluent and water contami- nated with offal, filth and feculent matter. (h) Underground or Surface Water means any surface or subterranean stream, watercourse., lake or other body of water, and. shall include water wells and. any underground or surface storage reservoir, whether natural or artificial. S . 3150. 3 Pollution of Water Prohibited.. No person shall discharge or deposit or cause or suffer to be discharged. or deposited from �- any source any industrial waste in a manner which will or may cause or result in the pollution of any underground or surface waters . S . 3150.4 - SANITATION HEALTH S . 3150.4 Permits for Disposals of Industrial Wastes . No -person shall ischarge or deposit or cause or suffer to be 'deposited or discharged any industrial waste into or upon any area in the city, or i into any underground or surface waters in the city where such industrial wa-,te is or may be deposited upon or may be carried through or over any area of the city or County of Orange except in conformity with the pro vision; of this article, and unless he shall have first secured, in the manner hereinafter provided, a permit so to do from the Director; provided, however, a permit shall not be required for the discharge of industrial waste into a public sewer with an ocean outfall. S . 3150. 5 Application for Permits . Applications for permits required. hereunder shall be filed with the Director upon printed forms to be prescribed and. supplied by him. The Director may require any additional information, including plans and specifications which he may deem necessary for the proper disposition of the application. S . 3150.6 Time Within Which Action or Application Shall be Taken. Within thirty 30 days after the receipt of all of the information requested of an applicant, the Director shall either grant or deny the permit and. shall immediately notify the applicant by first class mail of the action taken. S . 3150.7 When to Issue Permits . The Director shall issue a permit for industrial waste disposal if he determines that: (a) The material to be discharged or deposited in the manner proposed will not cause or result in the pollution of any underground. or surface waters, as herein prohibited, and (b) Under existing circumstances and conditions it is reasonable and necessary to dispose of the waste in the manner proposed . The Director may incorporate in any permit issued pursuant to this article, such limitations. or conditions as may be reasonably necessary to effectuate the purpose of this article and may from time to time, review the limitations or conditions which have been incorporated in any permit theretofore issued, giving consideration to changed conditions, and may, whenever in his judgment it is advisable or required in order to maintain the waters of the city and county free from pollution, alter, revise, modify, delete or ad.d further limitations or conditions appli- cable to any permit theretofore issued . No such alteration, revision, modification, deletion or addition of limitations or conditions shall be effective, however, until notice in writing thereof shall have been served upon the permittee in the manner provided by Section 3150. 14 of this article . S . 3150.8 Permit Does Not Authorize Certain Acts . A permit issued under this article does not au hor ze any act or acts for- bidden by any law, rule, regulation or order of any public agency or department and such fact shall be so stated on the face of all permits issued . • HEALTH SANITATION S . 3150.9 S . 150. j Term of Permits . A permit for the disposal of :industrial waste shall-Ye—valid until suspended or revokes] in the manner hereinafter ,provided . S . 3150.10 Transfer of Permits . The Director may transfer a permit to the successor in interest of a pe rmittee upon .the filing by the successor in interest of a written application therefor, together with such evidence of transfer of title or interest as the Director may require, provided., however, a permit shall not be transferable from one location to another. The Director shall immediately notify by first class mail, the person requesting a transfer of a permit of the action taken. S . 3150. 11 Tests and Inspections . For the- purpose of securing compli- ance with this article, the Director shall make periodic tests of samples of industrial waste obtained. from the place or places of discharge or deposit, and .such other tests deemed necessary for proper administration hereof. For the purpose of making such tests or inspections , the Director or his duly authorized deputies or agents . shall be permitted at all reasonable hours to enter any premises or place where industrial waste is being or is proposed to be discharged or deposited, or where there may be a violation of this article . S . 3150. 12 Cooperation b4 Other Departments . In carrying out the duties imposed upon him, the Director may request and receive the aid of any other city or county department . S . 3150. 13 Enforcement. The Director shall enforce this article and. shall, upon his own initiative or may upon the complaint of any person, investigate any violation of this article, or of any permit issued hereunder. For such purpose, he shall have the powers of a peace officer. S . 3150. 14 Notice of Violation. Whenever the Director finds that any person is acting in violation of any provision of this article or of any permit issued hereunder, he shall serve upon the person . causing or suffering such violation to be committed, including the per- mittee , if a permit has been issued, a notice of violation. The notice shall state the act or acts constituting the violation and shall direct that the violation be corrected within such time to" be specified in the notice as. the Director may deem reasonable . Unless otherwise expressly provided, any notice under this article required to be given by the Board of Supervisors or the Director shall be in writing and may be served either in the manner provided in the Code of Civil Procedure for the service of process or by registered mail. When service is by re.gis- . tered mail , the notice shall be sent to the last address given to the Director. S . 3150. 15 Cessation of Activities . Whenever the Director finds that e continued v o a ion of any provision of this article or of the conditions of any permit issued hereunder is - so aggravated. that the prevention of pollution of underground or surface waters re- quires the immediate cessation of the activities causing the violation, he may so direct in a notice .of violation. A person who has been so notified shall immediately cease all such activities and shall not resume them until the Director determines that all of the violations charged in the notice have been corrected . S . �150. 16 � SANITATION HEALTH- S . 31r-0. 16 Suspension of Permit. The Director may suspend a permit by giving notice thereof to the permittee: (a.) When a permittee fails to rectify a violation within the time specified in a notice thereof, or - b). When a violation is so aggravated as to require cessation of activities as provided in the .preceding section. A permit suspended by the Director shall be reinstated by him when all of the violations charged in a notice thereof have been corrected . S . ,3150.17 Revocation of Permits . The Board. of Supervisors may, after notice and hearing as hereinafter provided, revoke a per- mit on any one or more of the following grounds: (a) Fraud or deceit in obtaining a permit. (b) Failure of a permittee to correct a violation within the time pre- scribed in a notice of violation. (c) Willfull violation .of any provisions of this article of a condition or limitation of a permit, or of any lawful order of the Director. S . 3150.18 Proceedings for Revocation of Permit. Proceedings for the revocation of a permit may be initiated: (a) By the Director by serving upon the permittee a copy of and. filing r. with the County Clerk, a written recommendation of revocation set- ting forth the grounds therefor and requesting a hearing thereon before the Board of Supervisors; or (b) By the Board of Supervisors , on its own motion or upon complaint of a third person, by serving or causing to be served upon the permittee and the Director, a notice of intention to revoke, set- ting forth the grounds therefor and designating 'a time and place for hearing thereon. S . 3150. 19 Request for Hearin. A person who is dissatisfied with an action of the Director may request a hearing before the Board of Supervisors . Except as specified in Section 3150. 15, the decision of the Director shall be suspended pending the decision of the Board of Supervisors . S . 3150.20 When and How Heari Es May Be Requested . Any person who feels himself aggrieved by an action of the Director: (a) Denying an application for a permit or incorporating limitations or conditions in a permit. (b) Denying an application for the transfer of a permit. (c) Ordering the correction of a violation of any provision of this article, or of a condition or limitation of a permit issued here- under. HEALTH SANITATION S . 3150.20 (d.) (d ) Dire7cting the cessation of operations pending the correction of a violation, or (e ) Suspending or refusing to reinstate a permit suspended by him, may, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a notice of the action complained of, serve upon the Director a copy of and file with the County Clerk a written request for a hearing before the Board of Supervisors . The request shall set forth in .concise language - the particular action or actions complained of and. the reasons why. the. person or permittee feels himself aggrieved. thereby. Failure to file a request for hearing within the time prescribed. herein shall constitute a waiver of any objection to the action of the Director and his action shall be final. S . 3150.21 Notice of Hearin When a request for hearing is filed with the County Clerk, the Board of Supervisors shall .set the matter for hearing and give notice of the time and place thereof to the person requesting the hearing, the Director and any other person or public agency requesting notice thereof. The hearing shall be held. not- more than thirty (30) days after a written. request therefor has been filed with the County Clerk and not less than ten days after the issuance . of the notice thereof. S . 3150.22 Hearin . At the time and place set for hearing, the person requesting the hearing, the Director and any interested person or public agency may appear and be heard either in person or by counsel. S . 3150.2; Decision. The Board of Supervisors shall, within thirty 3 days after conclusion of the hearing, render its deci- sion. The Board of Supervisors may: (a) Confirm the action of the Director. (b) Direct the Director to issue a permit with or without such conditions or limitations as the Board may deem appropriate . (c) Vacate or modify the suspension of permit. (d ) Cancel a notice of violation or modify such notice in such particu- lars as the Board may deem appropriate . (e) Direct the Director to transfer a permit. (f) Revoke a permit on any of the grounds specified in Section 3150. 17. S . 3150.24 Penalty. Any person convicted of a violation of any pro- vision of this article shall be punishable by imprisonment in jail for a period not exceeding six (6) months, or by fine not exceed- ing Five Hundred Dollars ($500) , or by. b'oth such fine and imprisonment . S . 150.25 SANITA'TiON HEALTH v(.r.�. )iait;y If' an•y ;f:.�ction, sub.;ectaon, sentence, cla.u: e or jphra.se o i'�this article is for any reason held to be invali(j (,r ur,cc,n.;titutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdic',-ion, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remain- irt portions of the article . The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby declares that it would have passed this article; and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections , subsections , sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ..J 113 RESOLUTION NO.Z5, A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCTL''OF THE. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH URGING THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IO GIVE ITS. CONTINUING , SUPPORT" TO THE EXISTING COUNTY-WIDE REFUSE . .DISPOSAL PLAN .WHEREAS, ,the County of Orange is studying alternative methods of financing refuse disposal operations; and One -of" the alternative plans would. involve the charging of fees to users of trash disposal transfer stations •, acid Said fees would place an unusual financial burden on residents of .Hunt"ington Beach and other western Orange County cities; and Residents. of the city of Huntington- Beach .already" pay a significant amount of tax to. the .County, and' a portion of such tax is "presently used to finance existing `refus'e.- disposal operations;, and The present method of "financing and operating Bounty trash " disposal facilities has -been effective and non--discriminatory as , to geographic . location -of users, •NOW; THEREFORE, BE NT.'RESOLVED that 'the City Counoil of the City: of .Huntington Beach. does hereby urge: the ;Orange County Hoard of Supervisors `to give its continuing_ support,.to.:'the present=,county-wide plan " of -tefuse "disposal oper8tion :8rid financing. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City . Council of' the .Cty of , .. Huntington Beach at an adjourned regular meeting`_thereof .held e on the 23rd day of September, 19740 t Mayor , x to i 1 1 � ATTEST City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City' Attor ey APPROVED AS- TO CONTENT City Administrator ` 2. ' �c WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY /, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. BLUE=CITY CLERK / GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR ,C CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL ,,,.,,,„„ REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department City Administrator INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: Please prepare a resolution incorporating the attached for the City of Huntington Beach. Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds 10/7/74 Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: Ir-city Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 7239 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ..COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY URGING THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD- OF SUPERVISORS TO GIVE ITS . CONTINUING SUPPORT TO THE -EXISTING. COUNTY.- WIDE REFUSE DISPOSAL PLAN WHEREAS , the County of Orange is studying alternative methods of financing refuse disposal operat.io•ns";. and WHEREAS ; one -of the alternative plans would involve the. charging of fees to users of trash'.disposal., transfer . stations ; and . WHEREAS , said fees iaould place an 'unusual financial burden on residents of Fountain. Vall:ey and. other western. Orange County cities; and WHEREAS , the present method of financing - and operating County trash disposal facilities has been effective and non-discriminatory As to geographic location of users. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED AS . F:OLLOWS: That the City Council of . the City .of Fountain Valley does hereby . urge the- Orange County Board of . S.uperviso.rs to give its. continuing support to .the present County-wide plan of refuse disposal operation and financing. PASSED , ADOPTED AND SIGNED :his 3rd day of September 19.74 . ay or. A T T E S T: N D• putt' Ci y Clehy STATE OF CALIFOrzxIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY ) I, EVELYN H. GRIPPO, do Hereby certify that I am the Deputy City.Clerk of the City of Fountain Valley; that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced to said Council at its Regular meeting held on the 3rd day of September 197 , and was at said meeting regularly passed and adopted by the following vote to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Adler, Stanton, Scott, Hollinden NAYES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Svalstad;. . ffep - a ty:.Cl_ rk 14 City ton Beach � y of Huntington P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 925M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK A September 24, 1974 Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County Suite 439 Bank of America Tower One City Boulevard West The City Orange, CA 92668 Attention: John L. Fellows, Jr. Executive Director Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular adjourned meeting held Monday, September 23, 1974, adopted Resolution No. 3959 urging the Orange County Board of Supervisors to give its continuing support to the existing county-wide Refuse Disposal Plan. We would appreciate the distribution of said resolution through the Resolution Service established by your organization. A certified copy of above resolution is enclosed. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:scb ` Enclosure ilCity of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA �" OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 24, 1974 Board of Supervisors 515 N. Sycamore Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of. Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, September 23, 1974, adopted Resolution No. 3959, urging the.0range County Board of Supervisors to give its continuing support to the existing county-wide Refuse Disposal Plan. Enclosed is a certified copy of above resolution for your records. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:s cb Enclosure I/ P E.t-�. t 3 zL < �+" iy �-. '� , y i -- C P - ". _4` -1 _ d._ .. _ 4.c.tY -'Xx't'�Ya Sr' k� `„?- h ,F. '1 _ in t il. - ) 11 z _ax 5 'r �., c ,r_ rI l ? dr .., [ a � a --:'y - a. - f i}" 4,a i l 3 A: x t r 7. - 4 a d s - t , - d"4+-_ r£r - ...y. .1/' [c, _sa r - ---:, r '� t . z _r- rY ti i - * 6 t r.1 { ,:_ a� ' CITY- OF HUIoITi�le'sTOW BEA�C1� s INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Y ` HUNTINGTON BEACH -.i v' a. `3*,: F� - 5 '"1�- -?j _ - `' S -._'r �`�- _� . - _I ) -Pam.} - r F�! ihr_ _ 7, 4_ a `t.TiS ya 1 1 �I I...'I.�I.I'.--�I...,...-,'I:.-:N,'.�.I:�%--:.1-�,1�I.­�,.�,�,IIr,1;�,,L-I:.-�­I._.��.`..:.1,t�-,I:�.1,.�­-�,';.­:�_�.­-���'�I:.,�_i.:.-,.._',,-.­.-..�_�,.-�,.,.._.:'--.­­,,-_.---­11.1-�;_,..,�___,1_.I,-_...­.w_�._­,­...'I-,.:-�,I.1'.-`J,z�.,1,"'_I�.-',,,--�.I..:,.--,1�...�e�7_',..,,-.;',,-�.-�-.I,�I..:,,,.I.,�­-1 1_�.-_.:­._,_�--.�.�_��'�--1._-­-.�!.".�-;'1""�-�,`--.,;­,­�.,�-';�,,­,-�-.�','-',...,-..1---",i..,,..;-­,.1.­.­­, t'' - F ..S 'St To David D. Rowlands ! c From,; H E Hartg.e v City Administrator - �k . s Y r.J 55,', V '4 , t+ -._,.:__"v_'-.-;_;­�.:,_,,.-._�,I­.:3.;.--�. "'%e *,��r`-.. _--y_,PZi .E ,y:- r r '4zV 1S k-t -°-- ^� .c'dw _ r jlta 'S;S t r Subject Trash Collection Projects ; Date `'January 16 ,: 1974 ' , x } Xl. 3-!' i -i;C., 1.x R 1, r uS''a.5 Y_ }�•'4 S.1 L? N .;'F 'i..3Y a.� .. Y . i \i. 'X C ) --�. P� t k{S -ch 4 f3 f e ,s _ J ,, T F - •'� - - :� _:.r y W 3-u'1 { 'Y ' .-f3 .Y' .1+n7.�t.(1 -. The Erivzronmental Council has reconmended that the City "undertake } three programs°relating_` to trash collection, : oneinvolvin b ' ' a g the s.d &rate r p collec ion of' newsprintfor_recyclin !- g, the second�call`ing for:, red z„- tagging" of trash ;cans which do not`ineety City standards-, and-;'.the Third .; pertaining :to the use of plastic bags for­storing) trash Having invests ted these programs, I recommend the following actions r, 1 Newspaper Recycling ` Thi separate collection of- newsprint,�would - -produce two benefits Firs_t,:-_recycling is a ,waluable means-of protecting-'timber- and _represents andimportant way in, which . cane - contrbute _,to conserving natural resources Second, . the _City cant ° derive-- . much as - $15,000 a year in revenue from a . successful rec�cTing program. .. l 4. There ;"are :several ways in:which such.--a ,'program can be^ handled. The City could. purchase'.the_trucks :and hire-.: he 'rieces'sary employees -to -.., collect the paper and:-.delis er it to.-:a -buyer.; ,;but`': such a' i ,approach ' ` would ' involve _a large expenditure bef6re -we- 4er6 able to _test public .response to the program: Most. of the cities .that"..,have a separate . . collection program` contract .for pick u I favor_ contractin for „ collection and. -feel we . should draw"`"u p g p specificatiors "and advertise : for bidders Briefly, .:the contract would provide' `that a hauler make once or .twice month -collections or.: days that coincide with regular trash pick up The_:hauler would. pay=the; City for. the:: newsprint he collected ` at a rate-;based'"ori ;current market- value;-of:.newsprint and ` f the tonnage collected in Huntington Beach ' _ 4 :.:. , f a` r , The success of '.such a program. would .hinge on :,two "factors tF rst; there .must be. enough .fuel" available "for :a .hauler to be :abl-e" to. matte - his collections and some .operators 'are,:not:.:optimistic on` this point � _V - Putting the "proposal out-_to bid -would :draw :re"sponses .from,'those ,; .haulers who feel .they can serve our._City. -... Second, -other. .cities have indicated that- strong public' support:"is .necessary .and that a thorough. and continuing" public relations campaign"is:necessary. to insure that-- a separate newspaper collection:.program:..would:_be a long-term success.' , ,.. 2. Rid Tags - Enforcement" of "Article all of the. Ordinance Code , is .the . responsibility of the Public ,Works "Department At present we "respond to aZl, complaints from citizens, and Rainbow :Disposal already has :: and di stributes. leaflets :`poihting out the major requirements" of -the - . t _y ;- `- %%%-.4�-L!-_.'e.�._- i. . - 1 k \ w` y a. 4 _ 3-_b --cf }I. Memo - David D. Rowlands January 161 1974 Page 2 sanitation ordinance. To print up tags at City expense and turn them over to Rainbow would not improve compliance. In order to enforce the ordinance more fully, we would need to hire a sanitary inspector as Anaheim, Orange and Santa Ana have done. In addition to patrolling for trash cans left out overnight and other violations of the Code, the inspector could also handle the weed abatement program and other operations in keeping with his position. I suggest we look into the cost of hiring such an individual. Otherwise there is not sufficient manpower in the department to expand our enforcement of the sanitation ordinance. 3. Plastic Refuse Bags - This area was looked into in some depth late last summer. At that time we determined that there are many problems with using such bags. This department periodically receives com- plaints that dogs tear the bags open and strew the contents around. The bags heat up when filled with grass trimmings, lose their strength and fall apart. Sharp objects placed in the bags tear the plastic and make them weak. Further, a mandatory requirement that citizens use such bags would impose an additional cost and inconvenience on residents and prove nearly unenforceable in those cases where citizens chose not to comply. Finally it would require approximately eight million plastic bags a year to handle all the trash generated by private residences in this city. Since the material used in making these bags is petroleum based, such bags will become increasingly higher in price and lower in availability. While their use might improve the appearance of the City, I do not believe tht a =requirement for citizens to place trash in plastic bags is advisable at this time. H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:DLC:ae � - 113 11 October 1972 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Refuse Ordinance New Article 311, Huntington Beach Ordinance Code At the request of the Environmental Council, we trans- mit the attached ordinance revising provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code pertaining to trans- portation, storage, collection and disposal of refuse . t The provisions of this ordinance have been coordinated with the Director of Public Works and Rainbow Disposal . Respectfully submitted, C2400e DON P. BONFA City Attorney /ahb Attachment 1 "'Iffy CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL COMMUNICATION CA 72- 35 HUNTINCTO.\RFA(li ^ r To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator Members Subject PROPOSED REFUSE ORDINANCE Date August 1 , 1972 The Environmental Council has been reviewing our Refuse Ordinance and has made some recommendations for changes . The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed refuse ordinance and in their opinion it is time to try something new to both increase the quality - of service through higher productivity and to enhance it by making it a cleaner operation. We think that a great deal could be achieved by requiring disposable paper or biodegradeable plastic bags . It is my proposal that we use one fully built up quarter section as a test area and determine just how effective this might be . This will also result in an evaluation of public acceptance of the program. The •program would be as follows : 1 . With the cooperation of the HOME Council and Environmental Council select a test area. 2 . Conduct a 4 to 8 week time . and motion study of present method . 3. . During the test period inform the people of the test area of the study via the media , meetings and direct mai.louts . 4 . Provide bags , at City expense , to the residents and conduct a second time and motion study. 5 . Evaluate the test and if conclusions are that the second method is better , write and recommend the adoption of the necessary legislation to implement the mandatory use of bags . It is proposed that we employ an Industrial Engineering student , preferably one doing graduate work, to formalize- the sort of information to be gathered, conduct the study", evaluate it and make recommendations . Because Rainbow Disposal has a preponder- ance 'of Spanish speaking employees I would require that the Industr.i.al Engineer we employ have both English and Spanish language abilities . Respectfully, APPROVED VED BY CITY COUNC. David D . Rowlands .........__.�_.....__ City Administrator CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA LoS ANGF-LES ss. COUNTYOF................ ---_------------------------------------------------J Ist JULY Onthis.........................................................................day of----_----_ - -----------------------------------------------------------------119.72.............. before me UANET M. WHEER LE ................................................................................................................. ....................... ....-----------------a Notary Public,in and for the County and State aforesaid, residing therein duly commissioned and sworn, personally a JOHN C. INGERSOLL ppeared ------------------------------------------------------ ............................................................................................................................................................................ gazucgooi knownbe the -in-Fact of Pacific Employers Insurance Company,the Corporation to me to e Attorney 0--F-C!AL AL S_E that executed the within instrument and also known to me to be the person who executed the within jA instrument on behalf of the Corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that such pora -:PFLER g tion executed the same. r f V 2?LJ C-C.,i.1 FI)R N!A am 'CE INo 3LL'_3 COUNTY My Commission E- .p;re: iNov. 7, 1972 - L......... . . flS NG It, No, Public in and for the State of California,County of.......................... .................... PEB 124 6- BONG M-145,729 PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY A MEMBER OF PACIFIC EMPLOYERS GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES HOME OFFICE-LOS ANQELEIL CALIFORNIA LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. (hereinafter called Principal) , as Principal, and PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal office at Los Angeles, California (hereinafter called Surety) , as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter called the Obligee) , as Obligee, in the penal sum of TEN THOUSAND AND NO/100----------------------- ($ 10,000.00 ) , DOLLARS, for the payment of which well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, and WHEREAS, said Principal has applied to the said CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , State of California, for a license or permit to engage in the business of WASTE COLLECTION in said State of California, and WHER'_'kS, as a condition precedent to the issuance of said liccrcc cr permit said Principal is required to furnish a bond guaranteeing compliance with HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2112.2.3. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT if said license or permit be granted and if said Principal shall comply with the provisions of CODE SECTION 2112.2.3 of said CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , State of California, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. THIS BOND shall remain in force during the period for which said license or permit is issued but the Surety may cancel this bond as to future liability by serving cancellation notice, by U.S. Registered Mail, on said Obligee, such can- cellation to be effective fifteen (15) days after said Obligee's receipt of such cancellation notice. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 1st day of DULY r - '' 19 .72 WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. B PACIFIC EMPLOYER SURANCE COMPANY 0 IV By ` HN C. �TNGOLL Attorney-in-Fact Premium: $ 50.Q0 per annum. PEB-162 S P E C I M E N General Insurance Company of America 5455 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90036 • Attention: Bill Niehert -Bond Department Re: Bond No.western Refuse - M-145,729 Bond Amount: $10,000.00 Obligee: city of Huntington Beach Gentlemen: We are in receipt of a new bond replacing your above captioned bond. This is to inform you that ef'ective July 1, 1972 your company is relieved of any further liability. Very truly yours, (Obligee) � 1 ' GENERAL INSURANCE COMRANY OF SAFECO� t 6URANCE Home Ofhee 4347 Brooklyn Ave N'f Seaffle Waoh�ngton 9B T05 N k F � <r 1 c r o....,�'.;z.,..,a�.t_�,.�w..,-:.'a"..�.�u�.�.m:..'�i...a. a:n'�.ki�a,:��,:,.. ws...aw-„ii�.�._.,s.,..v,.>..,�.:x.s.,....aL..-..ww...._v..�.,.............,..s...._w.-....u»�_.....,,.....,_N.�_......,. .,.,__.__,u. «, _.,.. .. .,.,....Z... ...... ..... ........�-s REGISTERED MAIL cc: Principal cc: Agent r � City of Huntington -Beach Post Office Box 190 NOTICE OF-CANCELLATION Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 OF BOND L J You are hereby notified .that GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY. OF AMERICA; Surety on-the bond described below, desires to .cancel and does hereby cancel-said bond,: in accordance with the. cancellation,provisions contained therein or in applicable laws or regulations: BOND NO. 856059 PRINCIPAL WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. 401 West Francisco St., Gardena, Calif 90247 :EFFECTIVE DATE 6/12/70 DESCRIPTION License or Permit Bond Waste Collection This notice is mailed to you on June 26 19 72 ,.and becomes effective Thirty days (30) after your receipt of this.notice Cancellation Acknowledged: . RECLE:nv eo GENERAL INSURANCE.COMPANY OF AMERICA h:m' [e n lrh/2 ..� -•^J f � By — '�/�rNi� C —®�. �aV . aX Ori Attorne -in-facf 5455 Wikhire Boulevard Dated 19 Address Los Angeles,-Califarn;a Anna n €l���R�� PLEASE. SIGN: THE DUPLICATE OF THIS NOTICE AND- RETURN IT ,. IN THE ENCLOSED SELF.-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE ` 0 " mom S-265 R10 1/69 PRINTED IN U.S.-A: Z c - SAFEC001NSURANCE COMPANIES Q % �Z(U.S.POSTAG' ggpEpp 5455 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD—SUITE 1806 4 J! 27'72 �```�_ INSURANCE p�{V a LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 .ram 4 jmU POSTAGE 0 JvM2"72 V rRLEISTERED city of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 AM 28 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 1 VN QI- LF i L9� 49 i S'.=;/ PRINTED IN U.S.A. a v OFFICE MEMORANDUM To PAUL C . JONES , City Clerk Date October 13 , 1971 From JAMES GEORGES , Deputy City Attorney In Re Certificate of Need and Necessity Western Refuse Hauling, Inc . Attached is the opinion you requested. I apologize for the delay in answering your August 4th memo . I have had a backlog of opinions to write, prosecutions , "fires" to put out , etc . A considerable amount of time was spent researching the issue you raised. G : lm Attachment OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ' : -OPINION NO. 71-19' :. 13 :October 1971 SUBJECT: Orange Coast Community College 'District has hired Wester'.n-Refuse Hauling, Inc . to collect and remove garbage from Golden West Junior College . Huntington Beach- Ordinance Code Sections 3260 and- 32.61. require . a.certificate of ..public need and .necessi.ty for garbage collection. Western Refuse Hauling;, -Inc . maintains it is exempt when dealing with another public entity . REQUESTED BY: Paul -C . Jones , City Clerk PREPARED BY: Don- P. 'Bonfa, City Attorney James Georges , Deputy City Attorney QUESTION: Is the Board of Education subject to city 's garbage. collection regulations? ANSWER: No . DISCUSSION : There is a great deal of case law holding that collection and dis- posal of. garbage and rubbish is a proper exercise of a city's police power, and that it may provide exclusive regulations therein: "City may provide exclusive regulations for disposal of garbage and rubbish as proper exercise of its police power.. " Silver vs . City .of Los Angeles , 31 Cal . Rptr. 545 . "Purpose or motive *of the city .officials in passing rubbish and garb.age. collection _and disposal ordinance was irrelevant to ingiAry concerning reasonableness of ordinance . . .. Silver vs . City .of Los Angeles , '31 Cal . Rptr. 545 . "The city shall have exclusive right to .gather and. collect garbage. " In Re Zhizhuzza, . 81 Pac . 955 • "Ordinance- may .perform both function of taxing. and function . . of regulating, and may be upheld as valid .unde;r either. or. : both powers,. " City of Glendale vs . Trondsen, 308 : Pac... 2d ;l. Office of the City Attorney 13 October 1971 Opinion No. 71-19 Page 2 i ":A city may, instead of collecting and dis osingof garbage grant an exclusive privilege to engage in such activities. " "It is apparent from reviewing [Health and Safety Code] that generally speaking, in California, the regulation and con- trol of rubbish and rubbish collection and disposal has been left entirely to the local agencies . " Matula vs . Superior Court , 303 Pac . 2d 871, 876 . However, the ordinance cannot be enforced against state agencies ! "A school district is a state agency . The construction and . maintenance of a school building is a sovereign activity of th'e 'state. " Town of Atherton vs . Superior Court_, 324 Pac . 2d 328 , 335 • "Public school system is of state-wide supervision and concern and. legislative enactments thereon control over attempted regulations by local government units . " Hall vs . City of Taft , 302 Pac . 2d 574 and California Constitution, Article IX, Sections 6 , 6 1/2 , 8 , and 14 . . "Public schools cannot be regul:ated. by city or county ordinances in a field occupied by the state . " Tustin Heights vs . Board of Supervisors , 339 Pac . 2d 914 . For a case directly in point, taking place in Orange County, in December 1967., and which is still the law! (not reversed) I cite City of Santa Ana vs . Board of Edu-cation of the City of Santa. Ana, 62 Cal . Rptr. 863 , which holds as follows : "The Board of Education was not subject. to city ' s garbage .collection regulations . " "The test of whether a local regulation may control state maintenance of state buildings is whether Constitution or legislature has consented to such regulation, rather . than whether or not . the local regulation directly or indirectly effects internal or external control , maintenance or operation of state property or state system. " "Any change in the state-local government relationship regarding garbage collection should be left to the . legislature . " CONCLUSION: The city 's licensing requirements and certificate of public need and necessity requirements cannot be enforced against a Office .of the. City Attorney. , October 1971 Opinion No . 71-19 Page 3 state agency (Orange Coast Community. College District) , nor against another with whom the agency has contracted. :to. haul .its garbage (Western Refuse Hauling, Inc . ) . The exemption does not_ apply if "Wes.tern" is hauling refuse of -a non-state agency . DON P. BONFA, C ty. A orney and ES GEORGES , . puty City Attorney DPB:JG: lm 13 July 1971 TO : City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Rubbish Abatement Ordinance The attached ordinance was prepared at the request of the Director of Building and Safety . The ordinance requires occupants and owners of real .property to keep such property free of unsightly rubbish and debris ; permits the city to clean the property after notice and hearing to the occupant and owner; and to levy the costs of abatement against the property . In addi- tion, the ordinance permits the filing of misdemeanor complaints to exact compliance with the cleanup pro- visions of the article . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney /ahb Attachment •�,• • !`IY`_.jr' r, t, •- • � • DOVLL MIl.1.kR f t �, ,rR t.� Admin1strallva city of Huntington Beach 111 ar II R A N U I D. C n5'I'1.lc • P.O.. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 nuAiAtant Adnln iAtr elpr DON P. HONFA City Attorney WARREN G. HALL MA YO17 Tro as�c or Gearqu C Mr"0w.Men PAUL C.JDNLS City Clark COUNCILMEN M. E M 0 R A N D U M - JnrrY A. Matney 1"e,l W. Bartlett Alvin M, Cner, . r�ur rnA Brand.:l Gibbs August 4, 1971 J:rrk Groar. r3n,,ald To: Dan Whiteside, Dep. City Attorney From: Paul C. Jones, City Clerk . Subj : Certificate of Need and Necessity - Western Refuse Hauling, Inc a. Subject- firm allegedly has a contract with the "Orange Coast Community College District to pick up. trash from the Goldenwest Junior College. I have been informed by the License Supervisor that the firm has placed their bins at that location, and are presumably emptying same. SubJ'ect firm has had a business license in the city for at least two years , but have never been issued a certifi- cate of need and necessity to operate here. The business license should have been withdrawn because it is not valid since they do not , hold the required certificate - however renewal. was issued as a result of the computor program. I discussed the matter with Mr. Ed Osepian, who I under- stand is Vice-President of the firm and resides in Hunt-' ington Beach. He has informed me over the phone that their attorney had interpreted for them that our require- ment for certificate does not apply to their operation, inasmuch as they are dealing solely with another public . entity. We .would like to have the firm cited for operating illeg- ally in the city if we find that we are on firm legal grounds, and that our interpretation of_ the ordinance code would require their obtaining such certificate. As I told. you - our relationship with Mr. Ospeian has been very good, and this is strictly a legal -matter. I would appreciate an opinion from you in the matter as soon as it would be convenient. JAMES R.WHEELER EARLE ROBITAILLE - OLLIN C.CLEVELAND KENNETH A. REYNOLDS Director of Public Works Police Chief Building Director _ Planning Director ' . VINGENT G. MOORHOUSE FRANK B. ARGUELLO RAYMOND PICARD Director Harbors, WALTER W.JOHNSON - NORMAN L.WORTHY - Finance Director Fire Chief Beaches& DeveloPment Library Director Recreation'&Parks Director �v-� y„ WESTERN REFUSE HA ULI G, INC. /a ��I!Iil�illlllill� 0ill,1111p;,11,. .1. 24 Hour .. Service P.O. BOX 214 CALL GARDENA, CALIF. 90247 321-2533 MUNICIPAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL July 20, 1970 RECEI`dEQ CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTIIN BEACH,CALIF.244 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk 1970 j"L ZO PH it : Q 5 City of Huntington Beach P. O. B ox 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Jones: We would like to withdraw our application for the license to haul rubbish in the City of Huntington Beach, California. At the present time we are not in a position to solicit-- additional business. Very truly yours, WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. Edward Cisepian, Asst. General Manager EO:st 1 v July 70 1970 Western Refuse Hauling, Inc P.O. Box 214 C,.rdena a CA 90247 Cents lemen o The City Council of Hunt2i each, at its xegulax meeting held Monday, 9 1 70, continued the matter of your application o to of Public Heed & Necessity to operat co a vial refuse collection business in the Cit v to ay, July 20, 1970. This matter w m the Agenda sometime a£tex 7:30 P.H. Sincerely yo Paul Cm Jones City Clerk PCJ o aw M E M O R 'A N D U M TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Doyle Miller, City Administrator DATE: June 30 , 1970 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND NECESSITY WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. It is the recommendation of the Chief of Police and the City Administrator concurs , that the request of Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. for a Certificate of Need and Necessity be denied by the City Council Doyle Miller City Administrator s ' I l WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. 11iiiiQ 24 Hour . I01.11iiliililillr. Service P.O. BOX 214 CALL GARDENA, CALIF. 90247 321-2533 MUNICIPAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL June 12, 1970 City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Dan M. Brennan License Inspection Dear Mr. Brennan: Please refer to your letter dated May 13, 1970, submitting an appli- cation for a business license to operate in the City of Huntington Beach. Following is information required as outlined in Refuse Collection and Disposal Ordinance Article 326. S. 3261. Performance Bond in the amount of $10, 000. 00 attached. Twenty five dollars fee for processing the application was submitted with our letter of December 23, 1969, and license was issued. (a) Western Refuse Hauling, Inc, Incorporated at Los_ Angeles, January 1964 Business Address: 401 West Francisco Street City of Carson, California 90247 P. O. Box 214, Gardena, California -90247 Telephone: 321-2533 Principal Officers: Kosti Shirvanian, President 6655 Radlock Avenue, Los Angeles, 7760767 Hacob Shirvanian, Vice-Pres. Gen. Manager 3430 Lambeth St. , I{os Angeles, 663- 1511 Savey Tufenkian, Sec. - Treasurer 981 So. Lincoln, Monterey Park, Calif. 283-7302 Edward Osepian, Asst. Gen. Manager 302 Huntington Dr. Huntington Beach, 536-6648 �i City of Huntington Beach continued page 2 (b) Entire City (c) Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. utilizes the most modern equipment and techniques in the industry. We engineer our operation to con- form to the clients requirements providing this service at no cost to the customer. Personal contact is employed to assure service to the satisfaction of the customer. (d) We feel that there is a need for a large rubbish disposal company in the City of Huntington Beach, Modern methods and equipment are essential to provide the service required by commercial and industrial accounts to keep abreast with the growth of your city. This is apparent from the number of inquiries we have had recently to provide service in the city. As amember of the Chamber of Commerce for four years under the name of Approved Disposal, now merged with Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. Mr. Osepian who is a resident of Huntington Beach is familiar with present Refuse Disposal operations within the City. We were issued a license to operate in the City and are presently servicing National Lumber who requested our services. (e) The only offences that those mentioned in the application are guiltyof are minor traffic violations. (f) Commercial and Industrial. (g) White Tilt Cab Diesel Powered Truck with 35 cubic yard water- tight compaction body, Color Orange, License #U43064. (h) Finger Prints. (i) FJ.io to s. Very truly yours, WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. Kosti Shirvanian, President KS:st W WECEIPT Date 19Z3 8:390 m ,Received From o (c Address 00 X �'.. z �� Dollars $ `��. \` z 4- o C§Fo1V VS, r Li n„ ACCOUNT HOW�PAI!�AMIVOF \ \ o ACCOUNT.` \ 'CASH �\\\\\\\\\\ \\`\ =AMT PAID. CHECK (j \��BALANCE\`\- - - .MONEY 8K808 Raditirm _WESTERN REFUSE HAULING P. 0. BOX 214 GARDENA. CALIF. 90247 City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Dan M. Brennan License Inspection WESTERN REFUSE HAULING., INC. "!!i!!^!iiu!u;, Ior 24 Hour "u4!!9 yi;u!ihif!!1!riip; Service P.O. BOX 214 CALL GARDENA, CALIF. 90247 321-2533 MUNICIPAL—INDUSTRIAL—COMMERCIAL July 6, 1970 Huntington Beach n City Hall Huntington Beach, California Attention: City Clerk Gentlemen: We wish to request a postponement of our hearing regarding the refuse removal license for the City of Huntington Beach, to your next meeting. The reason for the above request is that we understand you have a denial in the agenda, and we wish to ask for a two weeks time to clarify the reasons given for the denial. If you have any questions, please donot hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. Edward Os epian, Assistant General Manager EO:st .r -;} =WESTE 1 �.�R -FUSE HAULIOG, 1111C• - a 24 Hour Service P.O. BOX 214 CALL "RDENA;.CALIF.V0247 321-2533 MUNICIPAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL June 12, 1970 City of Huntington `Beach 'Y. F. O.; Bau 1g4 masw-' ir01�� Htintirgton".Beach, California 92648 �� RET RKU MUZA BE AttenlAon. Mr,. Daa:M. Brennan d-JE fil A License Inspection f Dear.:°Mr. .Brennan Please refer to.: your. letter dated" May 13, 1970, submitting an appli- cabion,,for a busines license to. operate in the City of Huntington Beach. -F—040 lung I ,information "re.quired as outlined in Refuse Collection and 'Dispo'''al'Ordinance ArtCcle 326, S. 3261, Performance Bond in the amount of $10, 000. 00 atitacied. Twenty five dollars fee for processing the.`application was submitted with our letter', of December 23, 1969, and license was issued. sw (a) " 'Weste,rn Refuse .Hauling, Inc, Incorporated at Los Angeles,. January 1964 Business Address: ' 401 :West Francisco Street City OfL Carson, California 90247 P.. .O Box 214, Gardena, California 90247 Telephone: . 321-2533 Princi pal.:Officers: Kosti',. Shirvanian, President -6655 .Radlock.Avenue, Los Angeles, 7760767 Hacob'S.i rv'anian, Vice-Pres. Gen..Manager z 3430 Lambeth: St ., Itos Angeles, 663- 1511 . Savey.`Tofenk;an, Sec. -Treasurer 981 So "'.Lincoln, Monterey Park, Calif. 2 83-73 02 ` Edward Osepian, Asst. Gen. Manager 3.02 Huntington Dr. Huntington Beach, 536-6648 City of Huntington Beach continued page 2 (b) Entire City (c) Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. utilizes the most modern equipment and techniques in the industry. We engineer our operation to con- form to the clients requirements providing this service at no cost to the customer. Personal contact is employed to assure service to the satisfaction of the customer. (d) We feel that there is a need for a large rubbish disposal company in the City of Huntington Beach, Modern methods and equipment are essential to provide the service required by commercial and industrial accounts to keep abreast with the growth of your city. This is apparent from the number of inquiries we have had recently to provide service in the city. As amember of the Chamber of Commerce for four years under the name of Approved Disposal, now merged with Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. Mr. Osepian who is. a resident of Huntington Beach is familiar with present Refuse Disposal operations within the City. We were issued a license to operate in the City and are presently servicing National Lumber who requested our services. (e) The only offences that those mentioned in the application are guiltyof are minor traffic violations. (f) Commercial and Industrial. (g) White Tilt Cab Diesel Powered Truck with 35 cubic yard water- tight compaction body, Color Orange, License #U43064. (h) Finger Prints. (i) Photos. Very truly yours, WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. 115� F Kosti Shirvanian, President KS:st . APPLICATION FOR LICENSE ! Y - �s City of Huntington Beach POST OFFICE BOX 190 SIXTH & PECAN STREETS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 TEL. 536-6551 Please Print or Type Application is hereby made by WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. —to conduct the business of x: Hauling Rubbish Enti4e-Q}�*,- New-'ew-' njt- S , y, � at treet this City- tTJ z The proper name of this business will be Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. l� License bawAas not been previously issued for similar business at the above address. If you are required to hold State of En California License, give number 122-5683 State of California Board of Equalization Permit (EA) number, If the applicant is a firm or partnership, give the names and address of the members or the partners. If the applicant is an association give the names and addresses of the officers therof; if a Corporation, give the names of the Board of Direc- tors and Of icers thereof. . . z Kosti Shirvanian, .Director-President_ Edward M. Ross, Director Marion Shirvanian, Director-Vice-Pres. Hacob Shirvania, Vice-Pres. & Gen. Mqr. Savey Tufenkian, Director-Sec.-Treas. Clarence Pine, Comptroller . p (Attach sheet if more space required) 7 Edwared Osepian, Ass rt. Gen. Mqr. Statement of Average Number of Employees That you will use in this City: 2 U Date That You Started or Will Start Business in this City: Upon receipt of lieense Number of vehicles used in this city to conduct your business with a Manufacturer's rated capacityof:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . 1 Ton or Under Number.of Coin Operated Machines on pre i VO Over 1 Ton but under 3 Tons ON e 1_.. Music. p� �� 3 Tons or Over (one) e Vending ��`��aS Number of Dwelling Units r�Ot �� ���•. (Apts., Motel Spaces, Rooms) Amusement �Q Number of Trailer Spaces Service A� L® Number of Rental Trailers Total `` \ Number of Rental Passenger Cars I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above statements are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, correct. I understand that the "Statement of Average Number of Employees" is written penalty of perjury. Signature of Applicant Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. i Business Address: P. 0. Box 214, Gardena. Calif. 20247 Tel: 21-2533 Res'den dd ess:401 W. Francisco St. , Carson, Calif. Tel: 321-2533 Se e E II �o REVERSE SIDE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - - -- r _ i _ � r 1 * . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 7� 7� Classification of business Fee Date application submitted Application accepted by Distributed Approved Disapproved Planning Department Fire Department Building Department Police Department i Health Officer License Number Granted 7y Expires -71 Decal Number(s) City Clerk i Remarks: i `li I ' \\\\ i \ \\�`•\\\ .` \\� M\\\ F,REC E 1 P.e date — Received From \� ,Address \ .\.• �•�Dollars�$ \ � HOW PAtb AMi LINT \ACCO \` GASH AMTPAID- CHECK Z ALANCE- MONEY `- DUE ORDER By 8K808 Redify m1 RJUIVISAWS I Uil ULAUJI January 6; 1970 Western Refuse Haulier g,..Inc'. 01 P . 0. Box 214. Gardena, 'California, 90247 Attention: Edward -06epi'an Dear'`Mr. Osepian: . ' ... We have received your completed application"form. fo,r busi ess: license to cover your:operation• in this Please note the enclosed copy •of our Ordinance Code in s particular -Article #326) which:requires that you, file for a'' Certi•ficate of Need and Necessity for this type of operation. :Please submit another letter, giving Al'l 'the required information, along with. all the othex 'requirements as set forth in Article.#326 ' r of our. Ordinance Code. Upon receipt of all the re wired ,information q.:.. etc `.we wift -be happy to 'follow'our routine procedure _to.process your: request for a .business license' for this If you;have further. questions,-_:please feel free.-to contact office• and we will•:•help .in all' possible ways. siriceielY;. Dan- M.. Brennan: , yi 'License Inspector.. DMB i, it Encl. CX�P 'se� t WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC., m 24 Hour IT ililiiIiiiii1... Service P.O. BOX 214 - CALL GARDENA, CALIF. 90247 321-2533 MUNICIPAL-INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL December 23, 1969 City of Huntington Beach South & Pecan Streets P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Gentlemen: Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. respectfully submits an application for a permit to pick up, haul, and dispose of commercial and industrial rubbish generated in the City of Huntington Beach. We have had numerous requests to service accounts within the city and are qualified to handle any type of commercial or industrial establishments. We now provide this type of service to Municipalities, Oil Refineries, Aluminum Plants, Chemical Plants, Railroads, Apartments, Residential, Government Contracts, and many other types of business in Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Enclosed is our check for $25.00 as required for processing the appli- cation. We solicit your favorable consideration and if there should be any questions regarding our application, please feel free to call us. Very truly yours, y WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, IN�. \�P A � Edward Osepian t`�t �►� Ass't. General Manager EO/es Encl. i r City of Huntington Beach DAdmnBlt�LEB Drr;„er BRANDER D. CASTLE Assistant « P.O. BOX 180 CALIFORNIA 52618 Administrator DON P. BON FA City A-ttorney COUNCILMEN June 5, 197O WARREN G. HALL 7 'Treasurer JACK GREEN, MAYOR PAUL ALVIN M. R L C. JONES TED W. BAR T ETT City Clerk OR. HENRY S. KAUFMAN - JERRY A. MATNEY - GEORGE C. Me CRACKEN - OR. DONALD D. SHIPLEY Mr. George Osepian �. Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. ; P. 0 Box 21 .-: . Gardena, CA 90247 Dear Sir: As you are aware, the City of' Huntington Beach granted you a license on February 1, 1970 to haul rubbish in the City from commercial areas only. " At the time this license was issued., you were not required to file for a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity as required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, die to a misinterpretation of the Code s by the Assistant City Adininistrator. Since that time it has been determined that your company will be required to make application for. .such Certificate of Need and Necessity which is granted. -by the City Council. On May 13, 1970 you were informed of this requirement, and " directed. to make such application if you wish to continue operations in the City; �otherwise it would be necessary to revoke the license issued to you. To date we have not received. such application from you, even though the License Supervisor mailed. you copies . of the Section of the Ordinance Code covering this matter. You must also realize that merely ti making application for the Certificate is no assurance that it will be approved by the City Council. Therefore if we have not received such application from you by June 10, in order that it may be submitted to the City Council on June 15, it will be necessary for me to make a revocation of this license as it now exists . I trust you will look into this matter. immediately. erely'Pe s, Paul C. J es City Cler PCJ: pa -� - JAMES R. WHEELER EARLE ROBITAILLE OLLIN C. CLEVELAND KENNETH A. REYNOLDS Director or Public Works Police Chief Ruildinq Director Planning Director VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE FRANK B. ARGUELLO RAYMOND PICARD Director Harbors, WALTER 'h. JOHNSON NO ton & Park� Director L. WORTHY Finance Director Fire Chief QPaches& Development Library D R�•.•n�aion irector � - -J x= - - �.. , -+: r -r - i % r - *. - - .y' . _ . - - .. r. . ' — .� h.,. ✓i . - h •i: , ' 4 " _ ... 4 z - i ." 1. 7 I- ` - r - -" j . GHQ e P\- F�\ Cv .Iv.;---_..�,.:..N'-_.1-!­�-,".,- 7 r 0R\G\N as4 r `, _ M c - _ ��� ' Mays 13, 1970 = i {0 _ t R . F :7 wA CA:V. O�; - < r4 A'Yc i ` f ... _ I Y 1 . _ _ s ' _ - ..r - _ -- - - - Mr,. Ge'orge.'Osepian � _ ['estd — Refuse Hauling, ;Inc,.. _ `. . P, -0 .Box 214 I. ,:Gardena; California •90.. -, . t, <I . Dear Mr..- Osepian• • :.: -' As .per our telephone::c` v sa o May.; 12, 1970 •'.please, : 4 .fifid,. enclosed that se t on. o t e ntiington,'Beach Ordinance •� O - Code'1pertaining to,Ce ificat f'Need d Neces'sity.� for. ,refuse.' JI collection, which is- a ire all 'refuse collectors in this -1.Yt{� _ i r • If you .would p .ease..`r t rn:.to this•office all :=required forms 1 I. x F and.Informati n nece y we will get thi'_s matter, before. the .:City.,.Council..`a soon s possible. . „- . . . _� If any assistance is needed concerning 1this... '.matter p ease write 3, or ca-ll us. l ." .. Very 'truly yours ' . .. ri (, f . �. 1 - ' _ } • - • _ .. �. _ r Dan"M Brennan • ::L' cense Supervisor - f . . .' 5 , DMB:mlt Encl.. * r ' 4 f.. . `" } 4. `I r . Iry APPLICATION FOR .LICENSL *4 City of Huntington Beach POST OFFICE BOX 190 • SIXTH & PECAN STREETS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 TEL. 536-6SS1 Please 04i 1 or Type Application is hereby;made by WESTERN REFUSE.HAULING, INC. —to conduct the business of cot �-- Hauliria:Rubbish at Matins sear— as ©ULystreet, this City. i is f k. Western Refuse Hauling, Inc. . The proper name of this business will be i License l alias not be" previously issued for similar business at the above address. If you are required to hold State of California.License;:give number 122-5683" ,,..State of California Board of Equalization Permit MAY number '3 If the,applicant is.a,.firm or partnership, give the names and address of the members or the partners. If the applicant is an association give the names oad addresses of the officers therof; if a Corporation, give the names of the Board of Direc-- tors.and OfAcers thereof. ! ltosti Shirvanian.,..Director-President Edward M. Ross, Director ! _X=ion Shirvanian, Director-Vice-Pres. Hacob Shirvania, Vice-Pres. & Gen. Mgr: .: aveY Tufenkian,-'Director-Sec.—Treas. Clarence Pine, Comptroller (Atfaeh sheet if more space required) Edwared Osepian, Ass rt. Gen. Mgr. Statement of Average Number of Employees That you will use in this City: 2 Dotle That You Started or Will Start Business in this City: Upon receipt of ligense Number,of vehiclesused In this city to conduct your buslaess with o"Minufoclurer's rated capacity of:. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 Ton or Under Number of Coin.Op rated Machines on premises: Over 1 Ton but under 3 Tons Music. 3 Tons or Over 1 (one) Vending Number of Dwelling Units . (Apts., Motel Spaces, Rooms) Amusement Number of Trailer Spaces Service Number of Rental Trailers Total Number of Rental Passenger Cars I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above statements are,.to the best of my knowledge and belief, correct. I understand that the "Statement of Average Number of Employees" is written penalty of perjury. 4 Signature of Applicant western Refuse Hauling, Inc. l i per Business Address: 2, _0 Box 214 Gardena, Calif. 90247 Tel. 21-2533 7 Res • dd i:401 W. Francisco St. , Carson, Calif. Tel: 321-2533 [� - - - REVERSE SIDE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - - - 70 . IU')IiFFn54 Thlr! altl Wild 'Q ofMt bWFna>f siOMR N the address Chown by Q v i! 04r �bE �NldFp�n-q iitwd` TJl11�I1rc'Ynie a noMransferebis,.. < ! �1 N:: wl 3iF EXPIRATION DATE 'AMOUNT PAID 580 3 VN) �irLATIUMUISIRtlit swoop LO T �i,lq�iar�, Gslitt �f�� �t 33611 CITY_TRK - ,HEALTH REI E COLLECTION & DISPOSAL S , 3 210 CHAPTER 32 REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL ARTICLE 321. GENERAL 322, DEFINITIONS 323 . COLLECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS 324. REFUSE COLLECTION 325. FEES 326 . CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY ARTICLE 321 GENERAL (77 , 909, 925, 1365) * S . 3210 Owner to keep premises clear of garbage and other offensive substances . S . 3210.1 Every owner, tenant, occupant or person owning or having care of any premise shall keep said premise in a clean and sanitary condition, and no person shall permit any sewer effluent, excrement, slop or stagnant water, butcher offal, market refuse, garbage , dead an rubbish, cans , wastepaper, filth of any kind or any other substance that may become offensive, to be deposited or remain in or upon any premise owned or occupied by him or under his control except as otherwise provided by law. ARTICLE 322 DEFINITIONS S . 3220 DEFINITIONS , For the purposes of this chapter, the follow- ing words and phrases shall have .the meaning hereinafter set forth. Any word or phrase used in this chapter which is not here- specifically defined shall have the meaning commonly attached to such word or phrase .in -ordinary usage . So 3220.1 Refuse . Refuse shall mean and include all garbage , animal or vegetable , or household waste ; all combustible or incom- bustive trash or waste which ordinarily is created or accumulated in the operation and maintenance of a household, business or industry, . including leaves , cuttings , trimmings from trees , shrubs , grass , and filth of any kind. Refuse does not include heavy or bulky articles such as trees , tree limbs , logs , automobile bodies , large motor vehicle parts , building materials , abandoned appliances or household .goods or business fixtures , grass from renovating, sod, dirt, or similar material, or any other substance or material that is , or may become offensive. S . 3220,2 Basic Level of Service . That level of collection and dis- posal service necessary to collect the refuse generated by an average family in one single family residence as specifically pro- vided in any given contract between the city and any person for collec- tion of such refuse, or by resolution of the City Council, S , 3 220,3 REk-USE COLLECTION & DISPOSAL HEALTH So 3220',3 'Collection. The collecting, .gathering together, ,and trans- porting of refuse , for disposal .in accordance with the rules and regulations pertaining to the operation of Orange County dump sites and transfer stations , S . 3220,4 Refuse Container, Any container, can, receptacle, vessel, tank or box designed for or used for holding or containing refuse. S . 3220,5 Single Family Residence, Shall mean and .include every lot in the City upon which is situated one dwelling unit de- signed for or used as living quarters by human beings . It shall not include lots with hotels , motels , lodge halls , clubs , tourist camps , trailer camps , churches , business and .industrial establishments , or any lot containing more than one dwelling unit or upon which any commercial or industrial occupation .is being conducted unless such occupation .is being conducted -in a single family residence . S. 3220,6 Person, Any individual, person, firm, corporation, partner- ship, co-partnership, joint venture, or other organization. ARTICLE 323 COLLECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS So 3230 REFUSE CONTAINERS REQUIRED, It shall be the duty of every owner, lessee, manager, and/or person..in possession, charge or control of a building on any premises in the City to provide or cause to .be provided, and at all times to keep or cause to be kept, sufficient and convenient portable refuse containers upon said premises . S . 3231 DUMPING OF REFUSE, No person shall deposit or cause or per- mit to be deposited any refuse upon or in any public street, alley or other public -place , or upon any premises in this City, except in refuse containers -as -provided -in this chapter. S . 3232 TYPE AND SIZE OF CONTAINERS, Each refuse container shall be of sound construction and shall be water tight. Con- tainers may only be used for containing animal or vegetable waste- resulting from the preparation of food if they have a tight fitting cover. Containers for -single family residences shall not weight more than sixty pounds when filled with refuse , S , 3233 COVERING CONTAINERS, The cover shall not -be removed from those containers requiring covers except when necessary to place refuse therein or to remove refuse therefrom; at all other times said cover shall be in. place on said container. S. 3234 LOCATION OF CONTAINER, Each refuse container shall be kept or placed in such a manner as not to be visible from the public street and so as to be easily accessible to the refuse collector, provided that during or for the time fixed for the collection of refuse from said containers such containers shall be kept or placed as follows : HEALTH RE, ;E COLLECTION & DISPOSAL S . 3234.1 S . 3234.1 Near Alley, Where there is an alley other than a -blind alley ,in the rear of such premises , such refuse container shall be placed on the premises , within five feet (59 ) of the rear .. property line. S . 3234. 2 Access from Side Entrance. Where there is no alley other than a blind alley in the rear of such premises and there is a side entrance to the rear of such premises , each such refuse container shall be placed on the premises at an accessible point adjacent to said side entrance . S . 3234.3 On Curb. Where "there is no alley other than a blind alley in the rear of the premises nor such side entrance, each such refuse container shall be placed on the curb in front of the pre- mises . S . 3235 REFUSE CONTAINER IN PUBLIC WAY. No person shall place a refuse container in any street, alley, sidewalk, court, or other public way in the City at any time other than the regular time for collection of refuse; every person who so places a refuse container for the purpose of refuse collection shall remove same no later than 7 P.M or two hours after the container is emptied, whichever is later. S . 3236 INTERFERENCE WITH REFUSE CONTAINER. It is unlawful for any person, other than the owner of a refuse container or any officer, agent or employee of said owner, of the City, or of the person holding a contract for collection of refuse from such container, to interfere in any manner with any such container or to remove such con- tainer from the location where same shall have been placed by the owner thereof, or by said owner 's agent. S . 3237 IMPROPER SUBSTANCES IN CONTAINER. No person shall place or cause or permit to be placed .in any refuse container, any substance or material other than refuse as defined . in this chapter. S . 3238 MOVING OR CONVEYING REFUSE IN CITY. No person shall remove or convey or cause or permit to be removed or conveyed, any refuse on or along any public street, alley, or other public place in the City except a person legally operating a refuse collection service in the City as provided in this chapter. S . 3239 VEHICLE FOR COLLECTION. All vehicles used in collecting and transporting refuse shall be provided with metal bodies and shall be so constructed as to be water tight and to prevent the loss of any contents being collected or transported therein upon the streets .. alleys , and other public ways in the City. Such vehicle shall be thoroughly cleansed daily so as to reduce or eliminate odors and decayed or rotten materials . , r • t S . 3240 k__ US`E COLLECTION & DISPOSAL - REAL'TH ARTICLE 324 REFUSE COLLECTION S . 3240 CITY CONTRACT FOR COLLECTION, The City may enter into a contract with some responsible person to provide a basic level of service for the collection of refuse in the City at the times and in the manner prescribed in said contract which contract shall run for a period of not more than five (5) years , The City may, in award- such contract .for collection of refuse, advertise for bids , (1365, 1380) S . 3241 COLLECTION BY CITY, The City or -its authorized agent shall operate and maintain a service .for the collection of refuse from single family residences on a regular, . scheduled basis approved by the City Council, provided collection shall be made at least once a week. Refuse generated and accumulated at single family residences shall be collected exclusively by the City, its duly authorized agents or employees , or by a contractor with whom the City may have entered into a contract for such service, provided that the owner or occupant of such residences may contract with the City, or -its contractor, or any other -person legally operating a refuse -service -in the City for the collection and removal of all materials and substances not included in this chapter as refuse and all refuse and .all refuse -in excess of that amount of refuse collected . in the basic level of service . So 3242 COLLECTION - -NON SINGLE FAMILY. Multi-family residential, commercial and industrial units may have their -refuse collected in the same manner and for the same rate as a single family residence provided the refuse :generated by such unit does not exceed the basic level of service as defined in this chapter. The owner or -person .in control of any .such unit -generating refuse: in excess of the basic level of service shall contract with the City or with any person legally operating .a refuse collection service in the City for the collection of refuse in excess of the basic level of service . S , 3242.1 Upon notification of the Director of Finance upon forms supplied by said Director, the owner, or person in control of any -multi-family residential, commercial or industrial unit which is contracting for refuse service shall not be liable for the charge for the basic level of service provided for - in this chapter. I IJEALTH .&USE COLLECTION & DISPOSA: S . 3250 ARTICLE 325 FEES S . 3250 Liability of occupants for fees ; billing' landlordo S . 3250.1 The City Council finds that the periodic collection of refuse from all places and premises in .the City benefits all occupants of places and premises in the City and, therefore , all occupants receiving the benefit of the .basic level of refuse service are made liable for refuse collection fees prescribed by this article . S . 3250. 2 The case of .premises_ in which the occupant does not receive the billing for refuse collection but the landlord does , such landlord shall collect such fees levied against the occupant of the dwelling unit or place or places of business located on such premises , and shall transmit the -amount to be collected to the City. S . 3250.3 In the event the landlord fails to collect such fees from any such occupant and remit the same to the City, the landlord shall be liable to the city for payment of such fees . S . 3251 Refuse Collection Charges . The charge for the basic level of service is hereby established as $1.50 per month. S . 3252 -Fee . Debt. S . 3252.1 A fee or charge imposed by this Chapter shall be a civil debt owing the city from the occupant of the property to which the basic level of service is made available -whether such ser- vice is used or not. S . 3252. 2 Discontinuation of refuse service .by forms and procedures prescribed by the Director of Finance due to vacancy or pursuant to Section 3242.1 shall not excuse payment of all sums that have accrued under this article prior to such discontinuation. S . 3253 Payment and Billing. The charges.-provided for in this chapter shall be combined with the charges presently included in the water billing and hereafter -shall be called the .Utility Billing of the City of Huntington Beach. Whether the water charges alone , or the water and refuse charges together, or the refuse charge alone constitute the total of said utility .bill. Said Utility Bill shall be for the same period as the present water bill and shall be payable. in the same manner. Failure to pay the full utility bill shall result in discontinuation of all services included in such bill. S . 3254 Accounting System. S . 3254.1 The Finance Department as collection agency for the City shall institute and maintain a system of accounting adequate and sufficient to provide complete records of refuse operations for -which charges are imposed by this chapter. S. 3260 F USE COLLECTION & DISPOSAL HEALTH ARTICLE 326 •CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY _S . 3260 Certificate of Public Need and Necessity Required. It shall be and it is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person to operate or conduct -any refuse disposal service in the City unless such •person has previously obtained a Certificate of Public Need. and Necessity to do so, as provided in this article . • S . 3261 Application for -Certificate. Any person desiring to obtain a Certificate of Public- Need and Necessity, required by this article, shall make application therefor to the City Council by filing the same with the City Clerk. Each application shall be accompanied by a performance •bond in -the-amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars , as well as a fee of Twenty-Five ($25) Dollars for the processing the application. Said bond shall be in the form required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for other performance bonds . Said application shall be in writing and shall set forth the following information: (a) Name, age , business and residence address and telephone numbers of the applicant; if `a natural person, or if a corporation, its name, date and place of incorporation, address and telephone number of its place of business and the names and addresses of its principal officers ; or .if .a. partnership, association or unincorporation company, the names and business and residence addresses and tele- .phone numbers of the partners of the •persons comprising such association or 'company. (b) An accurate map of the district, territory or area proposed to be serviced by the applicant. (c.) A description of the methods of operation. - (d) A - statement in detail as to the public need and necessity. for additional refuse service in the City of Huntington Beach. (e) A statement as to what offenses including moving traffic violations , if any, any person(s) mentioned in sub-section (a) hereof, have been convicted. (This includes a plea of guilty.) (f) A description of the type of refuse service to be furnished. (g) A description of the vehicles , including color, make , size, license number, and special refuse collection equipment, to be used. (h) One set of three standard size fingerprint cards bearing the finger- prints of each person mentioned in sub-section (a) here6f. (i) One recent identification photograph of each of the persons in sub-section (a) hereof. (j ) Such other information as may be required by the City Council or the Chief of Police . I NEALT�i R_� USE COLLECTION & DISPOSAL S 3262 . . . . . . S . 3262 Processing the Application for Certificate ° Upon receipt of an application for Certif ate of Public Need and Necessity the city clerk shall immediately forward a copy of the application of the Chief of Police who shall investigate the character. fitness and qualifications of every. person whose name appears on such application. Upon completion of said investigation, the Chief of Police shall transmit such application to the city administrator, together with his reasons .therefor.. After study, the City Administrator shall there- upon transmit such application to the City Council, together with his re c ommen dstinns._.upon__such..app 1;r a f-; S , .3263 City Council Action. Upon receipt of an application for a Certificate of Public -Need and Necessity, and the -recommenda- tions of the Chief of Police and the City Administrator, the City Council, after consideration, may deny, the application, grant the same, cr modify the same , as the Council deems necessary for the protection of the public health, safety, welfare, peace , and morals of the citizens of this city. . S . 3264 Notice to Applicant - Appeal, The City Clerk, in writing, shall notify the applicant of the Council°s decision. Within ten days after the mailing of such notification, the applicant may demand, in writing, a public hearing. If he does not do so, he shall be deemed to have consented or agreed to such denial, granting or modifi- cation of the application. S . 3265 Public Hearing Before City Council. If a demand for a public hearing is filed with the city clerk as provided in this chapter, the city council shall hold at least one public hearing within thirty days after such demand is filed. The city clerk shall serve or by registered or certified mail, notice of the time and place of .. .... -,..said hearing, not less than ten days prior to . the date set for- public hearing, upon the City Administrator, Chief of Police, the applicant, and any person designated on the application to receive notice of the city councils action or the public hearing. The mailing of such notice, with postage prepaid, addressed to the applicant or to such other -persons hereinabove designated, at the respective addresses specified in the application or demand for hearing shall constitute sufficient notice of such hearing. Nothing herein shall be construed as limiting the •power of the city council to grant a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to more than one refuse collection service . to operate in the same area of the city. S , 3266 Business License Required, Every person, owning, operating or conducting a refuse collection disposal service in this city shall, in addition to and after obtaining the foregoing Certificate of Public Need and' Necessity, obtain .a business license therefor and shall pay to the City the business license fee provided for by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. No such business license issued by the city to any person prior to the time such person is granted a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity. by the City Council shall be valid. ... y,. !. 1 • • ', t -- - - .. :.. - . ,- � I . ..­ I". - .lt�i.,, ,,-�,-_-,j-, I-,", .,� � .'. . _... � . , . -— . . . . ,-?.,�, I : - ., - . - .t - .I' E� ...i .� - - t: } '.i-_ - c•' - - I�...:�,.,7,:II-�,'­-..1.,"".�-,,.,�.--.­-_.I,­�I-:F-,I-�IIii,I.",­.I.1­..-,..1 i,"..�_.:,%,�-.,,-r,...�.-..­I._._.-.--I,.-.,"-''-L��1.�'I.­�__,,-.,-1...-1.,1.,�1.,"1...,...--I­:"Z---.,_7.,__'_,.r..�-,-.-''I.,I.:.'_-''.I,.--r t '.:t- - _ .. t- a .r_. .- 4 (- p l 'K June 5,.;. 1970 y , - . ;. ,. .. `_ - - y '. `S is c a i� _ - - _ f I e _�f' _ ! - Mr George gsepan r Wes•tern 'Reftiser'Hauling, jlric , P ' 0 'Box 21 ti r 5_ Gardena; CA 90247 ., H Dear Sir .. 4 - . As you;ar'e aware, the City of tingt0- ach ygranted !you ! ' _ a aicense r;ori February 1, : 197 , u] .-rub ish•_ in tie Clt • b ..- r :._ t Y t from commercial:.areasr only tt h time this l;ib nse was issued:; - you-:were not::.requi e t ile For a Certificate :of, ,.- ;Pu-b.lic Need, and. Necessity a iced by -the Huntington' _ Beach' Ordinance ,Code•;:.`. . santerp'retation of "th �.Co.de by the. �Assistaut 'City tr r• Since that tune' it ;, 'has been determined. h t• you:.. company will be; required;. to ,. make application for•- ch :G ificate o. Need aii ;*. essity / which is granted: t y Council, y On May _•-.1 197 ou,,w a -Informed of this requirement-, :and y' directed to m k such pplicatiori :if .-you wish to continue --operations ;in •.Ci y otherwise .it :would be: necessary •;to ;revoke he lice_ e ued to you. To date we have not r received such _appl cation from you, even ;though` the; Ucense Supervisor mailed yoyuj copies of the Section of ;the Ordinance r Code, covering -:this matter. .You must also realize; ;that- merely ' %' .: = _:_. . i making application for:.the Cextif.icate is no assurance .that :- � it wily_ be`. approved -by ahe City `Council. - . �_ _ 5 _., Therefore if we •have not received` suc:h,..;application ,from_ you r -0 . 'by;June'; 10 : in :oraler that .it may be submitted :to the'=:C,ity , Council, om_'June :15, it w 11 be necessary' for me to -make `a .. rewocat_ion: of this license as; it ;now exists . h• trust 'you = ti� will `hook.. intoc.:this=matter im y. :m ,'. ed iatel :. . C Slftce.re ly.yours, r . _ . . . ,. - . ` Paul C. Jones I. City •Clerk PCJ:`pa' F`�. • r __ -t I. 4 }: �_.• i .. ,` .. RECEIVED HUNTINGTON REACH POLICE DEPT. VAN INcrU JUN 15 1970 qs C I T Y OF I-__ eaG00"4819I10�11�12hI2 3 4 ' . ca • 1S1i 2 -------------------------- - -----. -C A L I F O R N I A • �C4UNTY MEMORANDUM TO: EARLE ROBITAILLE, Chief of . Police FROM: PAUL C. JONES, City Clerk DATE: JUNE 15, 1970 . SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND NECESSITY - WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC. Attached hereto is a copy of a letter received from subject business , with the submission of an application for a Certificate of Need and Necessity to do business in Huntington Beach. Subject firm is presently operat- ing in the City under a business license issued on February 6, 1970. Said business license was issued on approval of the Assistant City Administrator who inad- vertently assumed that a .Certificate was not needed in connection therewith. Later interpretation of the Huntington Beach Ordinance. Code by the City Attorney's Office indicated that subject firm did require a Certificate of Need and Necessity if they are to con- tinue -to operate in the City. The City Administrator feels that a background check should be made on -the principal officers as shown in the attached letter. Since this firm is presently operating, it is our desire, if possible, to present the application for Cer_t'if:i,cate. of Need. and Necessity to the City Council at; .the i.r.:,r"e gala r meeting of July 6. In order to do ,=this, p-roperly, We would require your background reportQon ub,ject. of'f.: cers;: by the lst of July, 1910. Your =:cooper-at o_ri 'iri t°h`is' matter will be appreciated . PCJ: pa Attachment w ' From the desk oft Doyle Miller u ✓ CiCJ ' Nsnala,4 s rnolr } ( p pMINU0�p 1 1. I laeli it iop�n SPIN 31111-1i�i l . ' S31111 a0i ills tit YN3dVS_,J 0£ 6'if GO..? lip t,311V1VN I1"h► ! ;tl1tl1H111V� a ,annt� 'as '•17 l 5L 41 V 0 4—In .,Aa 304 Wovi SriC)t1NI1Ng� �1p11i 11now Ti , 00�9 ' CIf1;Y,l. nn.IN V { (.1 1 1 �r--•�"'". a� � }a+•.yrva;lu - �li,`.r_. � . , •" •' -J;,�!.�\ � t NI AYOOtQ>'�olltw AL9 ylyouuvtHYt tiNt4Jep ii2 1; - .a Ap s r Sit UTA•• � �OtiAuoMluY N�Y . ltl,��.. ��•';:t� a.: .."1 0.e��i ._ ;;;f� te1..r,aluAsvtw �w�� °Ot�� N'i11YNNYVI _ ':.'7�_`���it„a.�:dD�'.",',�y. s.ris�:T^Y.-!.�..c.•..w.- i._ Ib.a 1 �Wa 1- �puel��/�a Q��M117Y1 LINIaO' UaIIY d�ooll photo f-Aeral hurlduig, 116, answered �p•aifi "�'. ` all questions, with a "no >n hcelcci tip tlic steps of the D4assa:sotett eons a w #o p 10f, ate Queen g o h h;a tiilnent." blasted him with a shotgun. � oyce;. Pritieesses Nancy ( Cfl[(',,1GU — A fedeiAt judge Friday authorized exhuma- eritto end Colleen Zah= tion .of the body of Black Panther leader Fred Illtrnptnn to fodl;a; Mrs. Jay R. Stroh, I �� � ��vv c;o settle conflicting autopsy reports on whether he was in a wire of El Seyundlo's police I °� drugged sleep when he was slain in a police raid. 11S: Dis. chief; Chipper• Webet; Hat- trict Judge Edwin A. Robson gave cutn't permissirnt for an independent agency to conduct a third autopsy on the body ry Weber, sister city chair- S u % ""' ' . for purposes of a federal grand Jury investigation into Hamp- man; end Jack Thatcher. I a^Ir'o ton's death on Chicago's West Side Dec. 4. They will stay five Clays, j :'_•'-;y �t'ASIiItiGTQN — The federal judge frying nine anti-war i®r ''R otesters charged with ransacking the Dovi Chemical Coni- I l,Ei V Al 7,lr V Il:li i° i (Continued froill Page 1) pi , pans s Washington offices adjourned the trial abruptly Fri-. Stock and said lie was sorry he, day after a courtroom nnetee hivolving U.S. marshals, spec- ( had listened to Kosti Shirvan- tators and one defendant. ran president of esfern, iti•ten !bought it. �`f Phis is the only bieinisli on California "�,� �� �.���� . .• my long record with the city," `r t Yrishy said. t The stock, which was offered LOS ANGGLES — Rep. Thomas Rees, D-Calif., says he r—T. i� � r. l;"A ipublicly by Shirvanian. has will invesli;;ate a loan" received bv'his administrative nssisl tytp isince increased to between $7. cant and lire the assistant it a cmlflict. of interest is found. )anti KI n share. I Lloyd Winbiwo, Rees' aide, ac:celifed &IJ:00 froni loferstate < 111estern Refuse has bi en they Emavation Co. and deposited the money N ilie uongrecs- } (UPI) —For- comments abo:it .ten. J. Wil m ccneroa con inuing conlro- ans office account )tees told a revs conference. Inter- Lyndon 13.iliani Fulbright,_ D-Ark., chair-;versy in the city of Carson in state Excavation was identified as a subsidiary of the Bev- a ntwer asked 114n of the Senate Foreign receni weeks. erly Ridge Estates Corp., which is being studied by a fed- formal urec1ara- Relations Cnrnmitfee and ole of I An exclusive refuse pick-tip eral brand jury investigating possible ;nail fraud and misuse against North his severest Vic hiani critics. JIe;vontract given that company by .of Teamsters Union funds: C-irson councilmen has aroused Ito fear^riisaid Fuibriglit.• and ' eve."Wie ire of cili2eus, businessmen SAN FIIANCIrVO = Two shipping ennipanies viefe have set ellcotivres imnal leads fully un- and nlduslri^lists in,that city, „ �!" , aalomati(all;i " l fil.tcl $50.bW el',ch Friday in what. the U.S, Ju. ice Dcpart- Ir?-islot;cl'•in chance the.:bro-+d;'s c+`ell as criticislh from other) li , N ntnnni^a China; •�: ; �'•;.`." 111( It said rt�erc the s".iffe�st. llcrai,,es yet for il�_l;?l. c•a.�n- i,e fighlJO9. irv;r:ep• or, ,the :, rc ,,lutian' t?lt`1'efttcr comi�anira. paign contributions. American President Lines Ltd ar,d Ila- crhen fire` •> oiill?. •gof rou te.( , Carsoir co`,tncilnicri are split,rni` cific It ar ERO lines lm:: pleaded ruill.v tb U.S; Dislri::t on s�:rl. into; 1/ the issue. r r +,troll Cal ,ress l`uihri liCr'.'a.`d 1,11?crs' stariedf I Court :Jtidge William 1'. Sweiaert Fririn•. Ili 10 cuulW; each ve Frio all ihei l(n,kia„ 'for ,tit^'.�c Ilan." , .In let►bod's contract with of vioiatin- the Corrlrpl. 1-'rnetices Ati: it. tlrohibil,, coi nova= Askcd t t - r_c:;ll} . ._rulhrir"('4�eSle IMLIS CO. cX-pires at, lir,!:s and itnior!s fr'oin mitributin g to eaut ai `ns f,lt• federal eded eince iUr},�rnrd Ih:lt Jo!ulsn.}i ,(liro:: 'll: lre.r`rnj o tne .c lr and Ole cil.i g p b u► do whatrverl, .i`is. .iud}'in* alternatives. af[icc�. block a .Ines his spokesmen. lien fir%Co6grc.s.. i r �.::-�_.._. .-._.__ .:....._ —c,.-... ....._..._.... . ._.. .....� Asia. @f� shout the fact, in the Gulf'of; "A rec'(cni clot( rcl'ut't rcu,lnu:.i. r. +".'� .,r .�'Gfa"+ l llnniti❑ incident. in which tt�oithe pn..<ihil:li(•, of ,oink, to a .0 .zr �I ....NI , ed hi; role iu; t 11r cV hill on till. refuse: contracts + e C.S. destroyers.~s(4e report .i; . :•�:.,,.. ,.:.:.:;� I t �'econd. nI a ,, :y with Cps aflackctl by Cowillun?st torpednlr'r gr)itih to an alt-tnuricil)al. r' : � '�� I t,�,�,�!.rJ:; •'_a:;,�a;a.�•It:'" pic•1:-up systc113. l , ,ter Cronkitc.�l�:,als. t l�;:lf,6; ;�.1`P;2Ft:ar°;9"`► . n.�-�.t.•n,t • I "it never occurred to mo. i /'ISby 15 fIUU,C(1 It11thC repbl'i 23t Su trig Yni.ific COItSI IiW ? �'~ a�%IiL' ��,.- •1: t aired Frida} -_ r being. M1.011,ly ir.' favor of. . Y r�clhr_r frOttl "lllbl'I}.'ht told nrtVSlne11, Thal ;: RCnOVUU '<E4LF. ►; ,t:r::..:.a. _..�r.:.,.::�,1 Ow Presi:tent of the Unllc,: ,nc municipal operatiun. ...._W....-_. —• I 1NIc bl•tw cu,�.'.1(a �ronld tic in member, of — �I3J ranch n,...i,, _ - -- -•;,.;;r: a�,-. . e, s:zer'"Wtsslv.�l+.oR*I.�+. rice Senate. I was complrtell ; ""� ,: ;-.:y:,:,�.,,;r►��•: ' i 1•:: nsked foritaken in, as was. Iho ,.•t.../ It:,r"Srr`'•1 t . � rash Pact, Zoning Material Sought The district attorney's investigation of Carson ' a government; has been expanded and may even- = . ' tually-lead to criminal indictments: -.::- "` ' The latest development in the investigation is a request made May 14 for city files concerning refuse hauling companies, min- utes of council meetings dealing information should be submitted with rubbish franchises and zon- within a week. t ing matters. The Carsdn probe began early That request was made by two this year after the councilmen ; -N officers of the Bureau of Special requested the district attorney Investigation(BSI): atld the attorney general's in- It is the responsibility of the vestigation into the circum- BSI.to Investigate criminal-com- stances surrounding,the award ' plaints centering around govern- of an exclusive city. rubbish ment officials. At the.• same hauling franchise to Western Re. time,investigators also have re. Elise Haulers,Inc. quested copies of testimony giv, Award of the exclusive Fran - en in sworn depositions by city chise,'which was nullified by an officials and refuse firm oiler- April voters referendum, gener- w ators in a pending civil suit ated a controversy that split the ,►t`'; brought against the former coup- former council and two court- cil by a rubbish company. cllmcn lost their seats in the Carson City Clerk Marilyn election. Cortina Monday night said in. The council had awarded the vestigators have requested"cer- franchise. valued at approxi• r: ... tified copies of minutes, clerk's mately $5 million in gross files, council files, adminis- receipts, without competitive 1 .. tration files, and planning com- bidding. ti► mission files relating to Carson Rllowever, information on the .t� Retuss Co. and Western Refuse •progress of the investigation has - uatdm Inc." been scant due to the low-key ap• ' Mrs. Cartiha said_ the request proach of the district attorney cams * phone May ltf for and the reluctance of city offs- `, ' "copies that would be admix- ciels and eleption candldates to Bible by court In-lieu of original talk about possible criminal .`. . files." charges before an election. -.•� The dty clerk also said the ln- But while the BSI continues to vestigators included a request . say only that "an investigation Is in progress," evidence that for certified copies of minutes A; the agency Is building a criminal i i . and file relating to the council . •4,1 case rather than! Just looking f:. grant of a special use permit to into complaints,continues to pile . . West>rrn Refuse for the construe- up. �;tion of a refuse transfer station Ikputy'gist. Att. Ralph Mayer r `^ and Special lnvestlgator Joe Me- in Cars6c lag year. �.! ; Carson city staff is presently dine head a team now working -. full-time on the Carson case. tt , ''a, complling.'the request informs- It was Medina who requested ;f tics`"and,Mrs:=•Cortina said the certified copes of city files. J. 4• 4 +' SOUTH BAY s Emma . . . 1Y , r rV' i t Dotty ,�=e Ts►*+"�' Sunday, April 1?,.1,97.0 .rny Chettges urro ' ' n .u� . 0 R 'efuse Ballot Issue &l (Continued from Page Al) also .told the stock could be Junk and Yamamoto of teal. �' ought for him. spiring to take away U*Ar took steps to put the contract hater the stock could be residential refuse batty e ► to a refere *M- sold at a profit and passed franchise with the intent of. _ They werehstbccessful and on to him as a campaign con- •a Proposition o giving it to Western. . . . A n .Tuesday's ibution, Smith said. He re- Depositions, taken tinder municipal.ballot will give the sad this too. oath, have so far been gfvgn votersa chance to express There are two o - by Junk, Clark, Al Pratheir, . + ' opments concerning Western general manager of Cargan .� their thinking. stock which raise questions. Refuse, and George Blafse,, A "No" vote on the ballot about the propriety of award- president of the refuse fir>�li.'- :. . . measure will serve to cancel P P tY 01 rug the exclusive contract. The district attoraeq s the contract. Art Ball, a city planning reap of special in"Algatian.-, ' S The reason for granting the commissioner appointed by has ordered it copy of r'•.. Western contract is expressed Junk purchased 3W shares of er's testimony. i' • , . P y > In the argument for•Proposi- Wfestern stock on Nov. 3, 1969, Carson Refuse holds-in ob. ' tion A, which was written fry Ball made the original plan- elusive contract for tt `• Junk. In part, Jttnk's argtt- ning commission motion to list rubbish hauling, meat reads: grant a special use permit to more than a.year ago Car- Ar "As already stated, this was Western for the construction son officials attempted to ne-, done to insure continuance of of a refuse transfer station in gotiate for the commercid,•�-.... `• ttaiform lower rates and to Carson on Nov. 25, 1968. contract Western now has. .: .,I� •� �� o maintain.uniform high stand- A substitute .motion post- Further confusing the trek' se w arils of operation and collet- poned the vote, and Ball was use picture are five fire bomb-. tion. not present when the .permit ings of trucks owned by . i C' "If -you approve of tfie was approved by the planning panies involved in the Carson measure by voting 'Yes' on commission on Feb. 18. 1969. refuse controversy. s A, then ou will be assured By having such a transfer One 4 the trucks bel• of a cleaner city and unifortr- station and the commercial to Western Refuse. " _ t S ly low rates.and good serv- hauling contract in Carson, Estimated damage Id t�e,:: tea," Western could realize large fire-bombings is W,000: NO-•° `=.: �a • Smith's comment about a profits in future years. one was injured in any of ttte "Million dollar give away" is Transfer stations are going incidents. ' given substance by some of to be needed in the future to 'Cie connecdop lgtween tWf v the information he has given move rubbish from Scwthern burnings and the Weste�ra,: the.,diAtriet attorney, California to dumps in the contract, if an is diffic ulf to' :Smith'in a recent interview desert and mountains. establish,.because none of the a . Mawr i*ta:t, , said he told the investigators The other development is refuse men have bee ..;• 0 g P willing_: r,,., he`.was .offered a Western that Sak Yamamoto's son to discuss the violate.: . .- . deal. went to work for Western of Several oti tt)e ifiddW ' ••'r ` . e tern issue s area ter the council approved the have one unreported to 3.. s PP g_ repot 10.Its first.public offering late transfer station permit. And, police. last year..The stock was of- he purchased 200 shares of For the voter on Tuesday, . S. fered at $4 a share, but went Western stock. this confusing pictuft of W to $10 a share the first day Giving further impetus to cueations, legal actions .r it hit the market. the investigation is informs- investigators will make ^' S Mdtfi said he was offered tion and statements being ing an intelligent .vote ez tWestern stock at a time when made in Carson Refuse Co.'s tremel} difficult. he knew Western would be current civil suit against the But a complete pieture'id?','.- seeking an exclusive franchise city. the Carson refuse conttover-:" '•- in In a civil action filed in sy will have to waft for tlfd :' 0 -refusedthe offer - Los Angeles County Superior completion of the task cause he felt it was a conflict Court in Torrance, company ed the district attorraey'e of interest. Smith said he was officials are accusing Clark, vestigating team. _ SOUTH BAY �.. M • p � i r. BRA ras uAlhoc onimm , _tl Ma'',fe" ria. [i SO' U' ht ' The district attorney's investigation.of Carson t ' government. has been expanded and may even- tually-lead to criminal indictments. y } The latest development in the investigation is a request made May 14 for city files concerning s refuse hauling companies, min- utes of council meetings dealing :' information should be submitted x with rubbish franchises and zon- within a week. ' ing matters. The Carson probe began early r That request was made by two this year after the councilmen Officers of the Bureau of Special requested the district., attorney , Investigation(BSI). and the`attorney general's in- It is.the responsibility of the i eAtigation into the circum• BSI to investigate criminal com stances surrounding the award Plaints centering around govern- of an exclusive city iUbbish anent officials. At the. same ,. .hauling franebise.to Western.Re- ' time,investigators also have-re- fuse Haulers,Inc.; quested copies of testimony giv- . Award of the was fran en in sworn depositions by city chise,'which was nullified by an officials and refuse firm oiler- ..April voters referendum, gener atom in .a pending civil suit ated a controversy that split the l ,l ? brought against the former coun- .' former council 'and two coup- cil by a rubbish company ciimen lost .then seats in the t Carson City Clerk Marilyn election. �� Cortina Monday night said in. The council had awarded the vestigators have requested"cer franchise, valued at approxi tified copies of minutes, clerk's mately $5 million in gross files, council files, adminis- receipts, ;without competitive i `° { tration files, and planning com- bidding: - - _ r •� _ mission files relating to Carson Rowever > . .information on the �Refuse Co. and Western Refuse P•progres's'of.the investigation has uaulers Inc." been scant due to the low-key ap ; ' Mrs. Cortina said the request proach of the district attorney r. J. r, I s�F came by phone 'May 14 for and the reluctance of city offs- "copies that would be admix• clals'end:election.candidates to i . 1.0 Bible in court in.lieu of original talk : about.Fpoasible. criminal .; :<, ` files." charges before an election. e " The city clerk also said the in.. But while the BSI continues to a 'T vestigators included a request' '.; y only that`" investigation for.certified copies of minutes. is in progress,"; evidence that i }: f and files:relatingto the council the agency is building a crlmmal t;, case ,rather thad Just looking + grant of.a. special use permit to into complaints;continues to pile U F. f ; Western Refuse for the construe• up: + lion of a refuse transfer station Deputy'Dist. Att. Ralph Albyer in Carson last year. .. and Special Investlgator'Joe Ale Carson city staff is presently diva head a team now.working t full-time on the Carson case. ' compiling the request informa'' It was Medina-who requested j. tion and Mrs. Cortina.said the certified copes of city files. y t SOUTH -BAY i 4 P I E J.S•1. �' - I 1 to f D='o ll -�' , - t ♦ t -- - EO rA , ,;' isrT.H.E ONLY .D,AILY. NEWSPAPER 1N THE SOUTH BAY fyr al► rd y r Telephone 370-5511 L For. Classified Ads-371 �g1es- 772�6281 For Circulation 37Q-5525 . ; t , ' 32 Pages y sb 10 Cents N. Tuesday, May 2b, 1970. U= I j 9I ,IIs r yCtLV E , T L i rFY�PgISY; y F L, Z a lit, to 0"11:1. tl'f15oil­jctinl °Bite- ;:7 ii'c Ifs. oll .2f) v.0iliell witi .,le of file other folir inent akotit Y �.vy njg1,j',.j oper. L I i ItI r'(111 VIld voo nian. Another V.4-i 0 afilla, li�jt It canit,, only hours Wr hall, an aidillu 01116,lt travel- T60 111ji�(,;itrs had agrec to copilot after Chilean authr)rilios loid,in- es ing its it escapt'd b" ';):,o 1,l1 o llevi pilot '1110. Co- p forcing Opell,tale' Onor alld run- 11� lw.uawsf, the Illen Iloullt,("(1 forl-witioll of it NV!,!6a1 01g. who hail ilowil the Craft. from plan—no dclails givell—for se- TThe police went oa board dis- Puertu Mottitt, were tired. curity al. the nation's airports. cvadilinn of tiro mel Cow., kjdlsl�yg Thursday night pilal.remained inirlianzf 111"ll, for RIC ho"'llital Said C Torrnw.11,was still in Donald�`Irayhrtni. 11,#)t U WASIMMIGaTON Will) --Thv Till! hill ik(jt, lared N wltc agrcud Pridoy to add more da*vs of d0xite, priticipal- ed"pr:),;rvssijig&aOsMiOui Ill?)rc th'ao $20 million year ly Oil aille)Wriv:llis by Suitlhe-,rlt WASP I NGTON Mil)—The Widt"'jas and Strayix for public housing children to setiators to revol"le Army Friday dropped without duriag simultanwis opara Vic impacted aid school pro- recent Supreme Court ruillills 0 0' explanation onc charge of• gram which Tjre.zitlent Nixun and blunt frderal pressures for murder agifinst Lt. Willi-,ini L. Tlie kidneys,from an uu, t h school desegregation.' transported from San Fr, as labocli inflationary and I., (;alley Jr. The charge did not Seven Republicans joined 36 involv.o Galley's cotmection with truck- for the dual trlitsplar, By 'a vote of 43 to 32, the Democrats in voting against the alleged My Lai massacre. Put, Zendejas, it was his Senate rejected all,aniendment, Dominick's me and si.x- cajieyf accused of the Pre- plantation. Ill(, Torrance m bY.Scn. P�Eer 11. Dominick, R- teen Democrats -Ind 16 fliiptia- meditated murder of 102 C'Mo., to f!Qlcte the controver- licans voted fur it. Vjetnanv�,se civilians at ?4y Lai kidne) in Mg, but it, wasp sill provision front a four-year, Dominick estilinated the pub- on Milrell 16, 1966: was charged later. lie undei-Aen' st second K�'- Isillion school aid authoriza- lie housing pritvision would add last Nov. 29 with killing a new l.idney had been mallitue, tion bill. S237 twillicia to iaipqcted aid Vietnamese mail in Quang 'Ngai several ivee,4% The House earlier pissvd a firA year, if f-,Illy filiallet'd. Province "bolt six , weeks 17he double tramplwil njai :similar provision and the According to the 8 tt it a I P_ earlier. nbor are -11—f! thi'll, wit's 13(h Wdzwy trsittsidlwit.,, ai, flat .9roolc ;wfioa puled a challom e. U and Public Welf. it was this c1l, to NOon, in vebiing a $19.7 ConimiRce, file Senate bill dropped and the Army did not Pita(sivf,,e early October,j!)G. billion heal"ll and efilleafioll could boost total impacted aid disclose wily. 'Pie kidneys vicrc kentim-d spovding bill laic last month, Spending above $1.t billion a A Nnt:wott qx*cF.wiij said file pre-"idelit cited its M60 lb fied thl,w):., at the 'Unimr-Ity si Y year. It would add nut oilly (lie action• was wilhill ,this hospital and placed willioji impacied ;lid provisio!) school districts" -which edicaft: discretion of illoj. Gvll, 0 kvill as till, Incst MI-rantly expr)1- Children livillgr .irk (Oryally C. T' wned lrj k, for the Wj).Juilp ti cullilitllitlill" of 1!er 4N I-, sive end ifflalioliary itein in f i it nficed public bou"it", at Vort 1),vilkling, Ga Oinve !11am Whole llicilsurc. The udloi-' j-,roicels, but also districts %vi!ll Callen is.Marifilic"l, The "poke-s. Thq vxry Ilt'lit f lillc(A.)l iing ni.,;tralioll ak.0 olmll"ed the Cuban rrliigk:c families and man said Talbott deOrlc'tl ti 'lot Virn-Oision Chamber, ticd public housing provision. farin ebildruo. to refer file charge it) trial., zer cf Oli! U-partincrit of Surg, 'ity C,of qb Fe furnia's San alle STOCKS .REFQ$fter. is s i4vcd to rp to up to IG ij,,sur.3. qq< :It 51 a it wil! increase, N A V 33 play elliovt'd aki.-i as"'i"ll &.1 provide Foll,-:111dica ability of the kidney for itse I By .11611 PENDELL which re(- Frisby, whose jnh j�jvojves gery. DAW Oreers Staff Writes- use Collec koll ill the city. - daily sup"'I'ViFion l of tile enn. Drctors said n kidney IV!i1c, In-ew(,(x!'s ,�anitalion en. The sw:pew-ion Nvas a re-,411f, tract bcf,\�,?cij lug' iewotnl all([ Sisl;"We to the flOw of solutioll "hover has suffered a one-week of Frisby's klillirt, to jill'ona Ow Westimi Nelitse Co., W!i-Oit the the nii.whin^ probably is an Sl,:Tcvn_ion and loss of pay as,in city he ownvd Ole stoc4, :In([ T 6 T 7 N Mr,T T;-s-e—v—er-ar t I I o I I I i,,S ago for trinspizintation. iptfiorct re,,:iilt of his association not becaus,, W ;uly illegal ssriion at the dwe the co)!)PaI,y wps In addition, the imchinhe i of Car- or conflict Of ilitcrest'on lik; incorporated. Involi.-O-.1 cross Mnitchill'i Sol). part, Supervisors empllasiz(,d. lie paid $4 a s1rile, W rec;131mt, doctors said. Malt Harry Frisby undervient, the "There is no question what- The lnglcwonzl (,.wpioy I bcealrx of the till'.0 it t;.",es to discrp when his sit- ever of dishonesty on his port", since liar since divested himself. oe :I,e aad :ornplete teits Wir cri periors learned he owned 100 City' Administralur Douglas W. the-inachine will allow fjoi.-Ifm shares of stock in the company Ayres said. (Couthvied oil Page 2 Col 6) neys until such tests are: comr, G 1 f G;✓ 1 J �.r v.:� li `�:,:mow �i i ' �, I. • ; .a it ,I 1'' 1r By BILL RUSTRUIN4 prove of the merger and to -substantial change in the car-,. De1M Drae:e staff writer force the city to terminate Car- porate structure, shall be dcem•.. Carson-R.e_fuse Co. filed a suit: son Refuse's residential refuse . ed an assignment." In S,,iperior Court, Torrance, hauling contract, and to even-'. In May, the complaint said, ' Tuesday asking that a refusal tually permit Western Refuse Carson Refuse Co..began nego- by the Carson Citv Council to Hauling Co. to obtain the resi- tiations with Universal By- npprove a merger of.'the com- dential contract. Products Co. -which culminated.l 1 parry-,with another be declared The complaint filed by the in a proposed- merger plan. in alit. company said it entered into an The merger plan was submit- In asking for the action, the exclusive, 10-year written ted to the city council in'Octo c0ompany claimed the council agreement with the city for the ber, 1969, for approval.The plan ' was "unreasonable, arbitrary, collection and removal of. resi- was disapproved by the council. amounting to an abuse of dis- dential garbage and rubbish. on Nov. 3, 1969. r cretion, fraud and bad faith," One portion of the agreement, "Low cost residential collec-' I• when it disapproved.a,merger the company's complaint said lion of refuse and garbage" ' last November between'Carson provided that the contract would have been an advantage Refuse Co. and<Universal By "'shall not,be sublet or assigned of the merger, the complaint 1 Products Co. by (Carson Refuse Co.) without said. f rile company also claimed a the prior written approval of Mayor John Junk and Coun-'I ' •.1 conspiracy ' existed between the . . . city council . . . and. cilmen Sak Yamamoto and H. " Councilmen Rick Clark, Sak further provided that any mer- Rick Clark ,voted against they Yakamoto, -and Mayor John ger, consolidation, sale of a ma 1 _ -.. !Junk to force the city to.disap- jor portion of the assets, or any Yamamoto, the'complaint al- Yamamoto, Clark and Junta tion that tho failure o: tlla d -' A leg es, "entered into a cons pira-I voted "to further the interests fenclants to approvo ih^. pr tl,ail, tho company contends r.,. I. e < rr In its colr,plaint, the company cy with til estern Refuse Haul- of the SOIL o, Sak Yatnarnoto posed merger . . . via-; inY l ,1 mg Co. under which (`lamarno--and to further the individual i11- and of to force and etiect ri i sets'iortil the reasons why it feels the three collricihnen voted to) and Western , . . agreed to terest" of ilia three men. that Said Cen�Cnt should lien c tli G nave the city . . . and ilia city In addition, rho eonlplaiilt al- been given to the propnseu tr<<<: a-aiusc a nle: cr' council . . . turn down'the pro- er )Ian." p ]r[;es, Junk did thinr «filch g 1 Clor• ,,the conlnlaint said, apt posed merger. . : . and to do "threaten, hinder and impede The company also a:lcrd f( P.oacilen C11 son Refuse Co•ann everything in their power to officers" of Carson Refuse Co. "a declaration that in ur(co t a:lied for employment alld was 1 force tile city to terminate the On one occasion,it was charged, disapprove any r►1erger or a iurnc:; 40Nl-11 the Sallie day the-contract between the city . . . Junk told the president or tile ligament, the city council mu nic.ger was turned clown. land Carson Reuse Co." company that,if Alvin Prather, act for good cause shown." i I'�for 1 _1ov. ;, the crn;plaiut Junk, file complaint charges, in oflicer of t.tla company, "did i sileres, (�1��1k "solicited to oi)-Ivot.ed alalnsl.'lie merger"to:C- llbt curtail 'Dis activities with' !.-:a all illy insurance bnSilleSS".i cure the vote" of Yamamoto on the local chamber of commerce of the compan_y,.,Tbat;,too,•was Llle other matters pending be-din opposition to the city coral- '! I retitled. fore ilia city council. !cil's action of granting an ex-1 g !; .I As to ti'arii�la/tote's. reasons;I On Nov. 10, 19G9, the corn- elusive commercial and indus-1 : i ;le com;,laiii�,�s<:i ,: " Jost:er,l plaint charges, the city coup- trial franchise to �'Jcstern " 1-1 .,i iu;c 1lauiii;, Gompany is. a cil, by the same 3-2 vote, grant- use Haulinn Co., arson Itef- . conlpciitor ,Aanft,,was a ed an exclusive rubbish haulm; use s c(nitract for collection and I . Lem;)tino to obtain refa'%'haal- contract to Western' 1►ofusa isposal of garbage and rubbish ing business within tha.city/. . . �u ' would be in jeopardy," The son of . • . sal: Yamifnioto, '•;That vote, tile complaint :.aid,I Ill Seckinr the court action, Glen Yamamoto, «•as nn:hem- �,as.taken, "without a public ilia company said it is asking ployo.and stockholder of Test- hearint; and without SnvilinbI«jlldicial determinal.ion of its cril•" lopell bidding for ilia exclusivolrights and duties end it doclnrn• i ile company said it beliovbs contract, without pr•i�)r notificu. .. "that ilia N-01., of Sa1c Vanl,u)lo-Ilion to trio cornillurcial anld•iil-; to . . . �%jIs 10 furLilor Lilo inter-I dustrial iutvrosL4 in tho city est o: his so❑ . . . and of his and without including ilia itch: . sc. 's employer." on the ager-da," . ' t Truck Burns Nsa � � ,; ? �; 1 r S t ) . 4 p. r 5P ` { I n Contract BattleK Y�r Y F- By JONATHAN BEATY . Breeze wrier I` Dick Young, vice resident of Deity Bree s:{ The voice on the telephone not explainthe bi ABCO Disposal, said he could tRtFt � o e urnngs and " i was abrupt: �I !. bombings. • It must have something to t yytt� "Have you found the bomb N ¢ yet • Car- The do with what's going on in mysterious caller then „ gdon't son, Young said but I hung up before the startled sec- iunderstand it—we're not that in t , , retary at ABCO Disp osal Co. „ �a y; r �t ' ''' ~°`�►i; ' ' 'volved, 14005 S. San Pedro St., Gardena, ABCO and Carson Refuse had ft z4 scould answer. formed an alliance last year r �� It was the second hone call i y threatenin a bombing received while seeking an exclusive com : 01, •�a+� = L t 5�f t1 »f g g. i mercial franchise award recent I ' by the companyin a week and ,a` ���" r� s`xsr t ,z R �y i IY given to Y�&:1�� RILt''-�P_ A` . t «� lfa F" 1 f tray{, i pre office girls were in a small : }faul by city councilmen, c .RS= 6 F panic. The office had been evaa - The award made in Decem � :z � Max P uated and searched once. ; ber, has become the hottest is �z % Tuesday,_ the simmering ref- - — - -- i sue in the April 14 municipal W." use war centered in Carson : e 1 lection in Carson. Y erupted once again as another Valued at possibly S5 million rubbish haulingtruck was gut- + •* '�`�"'`�"" ,�. K in gross receipts over the 10 ? ted in a sudden and intense fire. y , RdiSx�R ' °gs year life of the contract the ,�,,� The truck, owned by ABCO contract was given to Western ,._ Disposal, caught fire at 6:30 without competitive bidding. a a.m. while making a pickup at The district attorney's bureau n . ; n` �: sqla. tr 11120 Hindry St. in the Los An•� � ¢ R of special investigation is prob t , geles Strip area of the South' ing the circumstances surround- ing the granting of the contract, Bay' ( and insiders expect a grandA s ! r The driver, Clyde Durgin, who, jury investigation. z `' had another truck burned out! Several refuse companies, to- 5� eluding ABCO, have been seek from under him five weeks ago,! ins the exclusive franchise was uninjured. Damage was es•j Carson for nearly two years -�' Y�,�f X timated to be more than $5,000. — >° Ott �� ,,3 3£.:: ,w i It was the fourth ABCO truck Daily ereezo burned or bombed in three Another trash truck burns pattern of. fire is similar months and the sixth truck burn-1 in South Bay refuse war. other acts of "sabotag ed in the South Bay since the This truck ignited at 6:30 in the past two months. . Carson rubbish contract battle 9 began last November. r, a.m. Tuesday while on route rubbish trucks have burn i Company officials said the ,'.,'r:: In L.A. strip area. Owners, or ' been bombed in attain was exact) the same as '`fi :; y. i BCO Disposal Co., say South Bay in recent mont the burnings of two other of to ... . — .-__ .._.-. .._....._. ._._.�_...- - their trucks by arsonists in Feb- ruary. The flames came shooting out of the engine compartment and within seconds the entire cab '';r was blazing. The heat of the ,mysterious fires has been so in- tense that portions of the en- gines have melted. _ - core C N �v dn '. iole'nce" I,- On :Ian.'9, refuse truck owned by Truck Clean Co., flames burst up from under the engine cowling. He ran for al �307 IV. 16 th St., can+4ft. fire and burned at 12:11 a.m., while bucket of water, but before he could return the flames weret ipai ked it► the com.lS f�v lot. When asked how it happened, 11.out of control and the cab was Dame.utted e is estimated I a company executii-s+•"who asked not to be named.gave an g g luncomplicated ansAr: "It's simple," he said, "somebody' .at.more than $5,000. came in here and burned one of our trucks." ✓On Feb. al, ABCO lost two truck engines due to a lack I ✓ On Jan. 29, Franti Walker, a driver for ABCO Dis-: of lubrication. Damage to the diesel engines is estimated at; !posal Co., Gardena,,noticed smoke coming from his load of: $7,000. The, insurance carriers for ABCO, Cal-Surance Aso—i ;refuse at 6:45 a.m. He stopped at the corner of Artesia Boule-: .ciates Inc., 2207 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, have listed the vard and Graniercyr'Place; Gardena, and called the fire de- .ABCO fires and engine failures as acts of vandalism, accord- partmenf. Walker. 42• then climbed to the top of the .truck ing to Don Martin, an insurance company executive. and peered down into the van. He stepped back down to the : There are earlier precedents to the current series of refuse i 'ground and the truck exploded. The heavy steel body of the' truck fires and explosions in the-South Bay within the past 'truck contained the may ive explosion, but the rear doors were year. . tblown open, and the stluare van distorted into a nearly cyl- yol On April.l 1969, the home of Thomas H. Turner, 2415 t ,indr•ical shape, as the debris caught fire: A window across the Via Rivera, Palos Verdes was bombed. Turner's young daugh- street shattered. Walker, standing in front of the truck, was ter narrowly escaped being killed or seriously injured in the! 4. not injured. explosion. Turner, president of Fleet Disposal Co., 572 184th l ' ✓ On Jan. 31, Bill Leslie, a driver for es er Roe use St., Los Angeles, subsequently sold out his interest,in the Hauler Carson, was driving on his route in o mg s. refuse firm. { :Ile felt a sudden burst of heat and then flames began to.; ✓ On May 8 1969 Ref lost a truck to fire, 'come out from under the engine cowling next to his seat. A,. according to Kosti Shirvanian, presr ent of Western. I 'sheriff's report notes Leslie made.a "quick exit" from the:. i truck in front of 2553 Palos Verdes Drive North. The cab of ✓ And on Sept. 2, 1969 10 Fleet Disposal trucks were the truck was quickly gutted by fire. destroyed by fire in the Flees parkin$ ✓ On Feb. 10, an ABCO driver called into his dispatch loffice and reported his truck engine had "frozen up." A -� ,,hort time later a second driver called in to report his truck.:: 'engine had "blown up." Samples of oil taken from the en (gives were sent to a major petroleum company for analysis. 'rhe infra-rcrl spectrum analysis suhsequently revealed the presence.of sucrose,a type of sugar in the oil. ✓ On Feb i,•t;;. 01is Manning, a driver for ABCO made Ibis first stop of hie day at 5:45 a.m., at 5.13 W. Gardena Blvd. ,As 5•lanning raised and 'lowered the first. bin flames burst up from under the engine cowling, next to the drivers' seat.' .' •, We scrambled to safety and called the fire department,but. ,before the units coilld arrive the cab was gutted. The :fire,. was so intense-parts of the engine melted. ,;r ?:k Damage is estimated at more than$5,000. ✓ On Feb. 20, Clyde Durgin, a driver for ABCO'made his a hsJt., Fir'a first stop of the day at 4:45 a.m. at 5908 W. Manchester Ave., F ti y. Los ..Angeles._ As Durgin raised and lowered the first- bin; c` t- al JU t4a him IR ve 0 1 1 ` f .. o•.n MIA . + � :� � ;. ••'� .tea•• rr m, �:..� t ry for Western Refuse, but Martini•_"-.. .:.�I ` v versial Carson city refuse haul last month, and'one in.January said Kosli Shirvanian, president'i ing franchise awarded to West- have been labeled the work of I of• Western, had requested het Wulet . year. ern Refuse last an arsonist, yet the truck fires )' release no details concerning the: . I The baitle over the Carson jrave until this time remained nature of Western's Jan. 31. commercial hauling contract has A secret within the industry. ;truck fire. S t John S iller of the Sher- ,�„� sparked charges of conspiracy g� P• When questioned Slrlrva'Nanl !;and conflict of interest within iff's department arson squad, would not say whether he felt' PAO the city council, led to placing said this week he had records the fire was accidental or not. ':a referendum vote on the April of only two of the fires and Shirvanian did say he had had, I ballot and been the subject of that one had been listed as acci- another truck burned May 8 a district attorney ,s investiga- dental. 1969, and that there had been, wf► tion. Hardest hit by ,the fires and ;fires in. the loads of transfer; I" The referendum on the ballot clearest victim of repeated van bodies parked in his lot in Car-1 i Uv JONATHAN BEATY 'will allow Carson voters to de- I dalisrir is ABCO, which lost one ;son on Feb. 25 and 28 of this Dal,v Breeze Staff writer cide if they want the exclusive ; truck to a bomb, two to fire, ;year. - "Aly wife," said a refuse com- franchise awarded to ster ' and four engines as the appar- any president in a recent con- The refuse official also said l p p �' rus o stand. ent result of sugar in the lubri- ,he had received a threatening versation, "won't let me start Tuc-s burned in the last two ;: eating oil. phone call Nov. 18, 1969. Shir- the car in the morning with the months are owned by ABCO An explosion within the cargo vanian, produced a memo con- kids in it." Disposal Co., 14905 S. San Ped- body of an ABCO truck on Jan. :taining the text of the call, He was referring to the pos- 'i ro St., Gardena; Western Re- , 29 was so massive that the 'which he said had been written , sibility of a bomb going off flrse haulers Inc., 401 Francisco . square, heavy reinforced steel down b the office when the key was switched on. St., Carson: and the Truck I. body was blown into a nearly. Y girl who took the call. Similar thoughts have .been Clean Co., 307 W. 1681h St., cylindrical shape. i "I have a message for you," echoed by other refuse execu-. ';Gardena Dick Young, co-owner of :the memo says, "I911 give it to fires ill the South •.Bay, since Last .year the Palos Verdes ' .ABCO, said Wednesday the van- ;you. Do you remember the ;'April lava year when the Palos,' ;4'bt?me if :Thomas H. Turner, i dalism had not affected service tragedy at Fleet? Well the same :Verdes home of a refuse firm.::: )irfsideiit:el beet Disposal Co., to ABCO customers. We have jthing will happen to you, and I jerccutiv,:was barbed. , 6t�afi.�,bpmbed - and Turner s I six standby trucks, and we roll- „ mean drivers too, unless I get t: : Since the beginning of the j fl}dung ;'dap hter.,narrowl es led these, Young said: In „ g_ Y what I want . . . year, five hauling trucks belong- /,;,seabed`de th-or injury,when sire : some cases, use of our Gardena Kosti said the mysterious call- ! P I - — r transfer station meant we could; `er hung u before stating just :ing to three different refuse. , r left "fier bedrdofii,miliutes be- +, g p g companies have been gutted in! fore tfie bomb explode'd•,against� double up on our runs. what he wanted. d Don Martin, an executive ofa unexplained fires and bombings. the outside wall ; fr." ? Cal-Surance Associates Inc., Neither Shirvanian nor Dick Total damage costs may exceed Ten of Fleet's,Irucks'.4eie •who carries policies on the 50 lYoung and George Heboian, co- $3,.000, but there are no offi- destroyed by fire;acid Turner pieces of rolling stock owned by owners of ABCO,offer any theo- cial estimates yet, since all of ., subsequently sold his interest in'. tries as to who might have set the firc•.s have not et been re- q Y IABCO; said Wednesday there Y the firm. At the time,Fleet was the fires. ported to police• in competition with both ABCO' was little doubt fire fires and I The question of who was be- Two of the companies hit by i and tt'estern for routes, includ- lengine failures were "non-acci- 1hind the burlring of the Fleet the unc7K ll:6iled fires this year dental." Martin said the claims:I 5 ing t}re Carson commercial trucks and the bombing of Tur- have dill ,th• o• indirect) been were listed as acts of vandal , � Y raute. � ner s home has never been an- com is t t inn over the contro- At least two of the e_burn_i_n s ism. I -lq-- -_h _ _f speked. t 1--- (,al-Sm•ance is also fire agent Pt=Pr1t7T Tr1 I rC)PV Tr1 I INCTR„rTl0NG I I AlnnfTMNA1 I �i•Q`�41� i,a•.r,, -. .K„ -1 j t �,ptN vsf - ,J ee hagDeal# Bee=@ Tor---�� Sunda A nl 12 19711�t ,j' yp�� g l, J r� vim• fi �� -r - CF • - y�- ¢ j o sA�(py� r 0.r. ` 1 - t-.` nt 1 a s v 3x 't��.T •1 , ry .� ��. �. ,.. .r�r... Fri �'YS. •:.�,eig Dam(gip p. fit . , Y T+r ac. ;O F��y�,klz.Z.}�_('Q?�.t� G•L•: U�l h .�l-iY.�``'f-7`rC1o'»� '1.91YF +..- '',:'s ; c. CM eD Cr its ��• o _ _-N - a (Continued from Page'Al) also told the stock could be Junk and Yairiamoto bou ht for him: spirin +..to take; avVa :aheir took steps to put the contract g g to a referendum residential refuse haulm '2 r Later..the. stock could be a; �r sold at a profit.,and .passed . franchise- with;the mtent�ofln ,t They were.successful and on to, as campaign con grvuig .if.to Western ;,,;r� � Eat '"a ,.,� ta� m. oa Pro Proposition;- A on'Tuesda s ibution Smith.said. He re- Depositions taken under municipal.ballot will give the ` used this too .�, oath, have so far been 'given ¢ ' voters a chance.to express ere are o,o ,-bY Junk, Clark, Ali PralhQr,W eneral _Manage;­of ,Carson opments concerning Western g their thinking. :stock`:which 'raise questions i Refuse, and George:,:,Blake;i.h� �. 8. A "No" vote on'the ballot re,' about the propriety.of award- president of ttie refuse.nfirip. " m measure.will.serve to cancel ing..the exclusive contract. The:district attoi`ney.'s bn• ,,.x �+, a the contract. o Art Ball;"'a city planning read of especial•investigation The reason for granting ttCe .commissioner :appointed by has ordered a;copAir Eli y of +P;ath•ri }F a- Western contract is expressed ' Junk, purchased 300 shares of er's testimony :, w _ w in the argument for Proposl Western stock on Nov. 3, 1969.� <',.Carson Refuse holdat an e$ `r 1' F. ' `< 'B'' tion A#ALwhich'-was written b Ball made'the:on anal lan- elusive contract for x t* �'� Y g P isesiden � ; r Junk. In part,' Junks argu ning commission motion to tial' rubbish liauling, 8tttt,{ �t yr a,��" �....., merit reads tk 4 m I.: grant special`use permit to more.than a. year agp Car-+ \l "As..already.stated, this was Western for the construction son officials attempted't0 n@- ,s n s done to insure continuance of of.'a refuse transfer station in-i gotiate' for the:;kcommerciati + . m ,� uniform lower';rates and to. Carson on Nov: 25,.1968. contract Western now•has t",rit r ;�*ir- c o E, w a maintain uniform high stand-: A' substitute 'motion post- Further confusing the �•ef r , i .► x•F Y.ga, f,, ards of operation and collet- poned'the vote, and Ball was- use picture are five' fire tion not present when the permit . ings-of trucks owned by'co t , r;s + ; a "If you approve of the was approved by the planning parries involved`in the Carson r B ?''Q !m i�ny ��y}"o ' ' measure by` voting `Yes' on commission on Feb. 18, 1969. refuse controversy " "' a'. f. A, then you.will be assured By having"such a transfer One of the trucks berongs ;i,j of a cleaner city and uniform- station 'and the commercial to•'Western- Refuse '- ► �`. i txa. ` B I1 low rates. and good serv- hauling g ° ' r�r y g g contract .in Carson, Estimated dame a id the ice. Western'could reallre large fn a bombings a'is $40 000' No Ott a Smiths comment about a profits in future years: one was injured in any of the ` � y "million dollar give away" is Transfer stations are going incidents. "- ` :pix ,p.Er a ` , given substance by some of to be needed in,the future to The connection between tl�e �. • `.. the information he has given move.rubbish 'from'Southern burnings and `:the Wesiernyl r. t -° Smith in a recent interview desert and Califor mountathe district attorney, nia uis: the establish; becaff use none o 1 o,� . . said he told the investigators The other development is _ refuse-men have:heed?'willing , he was offered a Western that Sak.. 'Yamamoto s son to.discuss the yviolenCe � •-+s ,x�' stock deal. went to work for: Western of -: , Several of��tiie 'iftiOntax F� Western issue 75,000 s area ter the council approved the have gone unreported to fire x �. In its first public offering late transfer :station permit. And, police. a, x last'year. The stock was of he purchased 200 shares of- For the voter on Tuesday, 5 n o l fered at $4 a share,.but went Western stock. this_confusing plctur Of' �.., + .... to $16 a share the first. day Giving' further impetus to` cusations, legal it hit the market. the investigation. is informa- investigators wilt makecasw� , 3 * mi saida was o ere tion and statements ;being. ing an intelligent ,vote ex ' Western stock at a time when _ made in Carson Refuse Co.'s _tremelydifficult he knew Western would :be current-.civil suit against the : But a"complete IN picture m 4 seeking an exclusive Franchise city.. the .Carson refuse controver f FC. Ca 'Pr _ in Car§on. In a .civil action filed in sy-will have to wait for the t Smithrefused the offer e- Los Angeles County Superior completion of the task assign- o Ai` c cause he felt it was a conflict Court in Torrance, company .ed. ,the district',attorneys a,gr Fu of interest. Smith said he was officials.are accusing Clark; vestigating team M. � R W.�, SOUTs. f-t 8�4 7� a�rAK O.< ., .y,a 'a f �R-ate�•�'.A,-y C'C •�" .: �cp'r .-o a EA i e VY - INS �- CITY,; OF Q ------------------------ -- ---------------------------- cFa� 9'�pe CALI FORNIA �C4UNTY MEMORANDUM To: EARLE ROBITAILLE, Chief of Police FROM: PAUL C. JONES, City Clerk DATE: JUNE 15, 1970 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF NEED AND NECESSITY - WESTERN REFUSE HAULING, INC . Attached hereto is a copy of a letter received from subject :;,bus nes_s., -- with the submission of an application for a Certificate of. Nee.d and Necessity to do business in Huntington Beach. Subject firm is presently operat- ing in the City under a business license issued on February 6, 1970. Said. business . license was issued on approval of the Assistant City Administrator who inad- vertently assumed that a Certificate was not needed in connection therewith. Later interpretation of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code by the City Attorney's Office indicated that subject firm did require a Certificate of Need and Necessity if they are to con- tinue to operate in the City. The City, Administrator feels that a background check should b'e;fmad.e on the principal officers as shown in the attached":letter. Since this firm is presently operating, �it„``�is :our: desire, if possible , to present the applicat 6ri- for Cert"ificate of Need and Necessity to the City" Coun`ci'l; at their regular meeting of July o. In order to do this properly, we would require your background report on siibject officers by the lst of July, 1970. Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated . PCJ: a A Attachment 1 1 r k v I h V � ` M E M 0 R A N D U M SeSS,aV Qf.....--- nn- - --- - -- ---- TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Doyle Miller, City Administrator DATE: June 29' , 1970, The attached reports were transmitted to the Council for study on June 17 . The Administrator recommends that the City Attorney be directed to prepare a tentative ordinance for Council ' s study, following the League of Cities model ordinance , based on the rates scheduled in Mr . Arguello's Alternate No. 7 , with Option #4 covering oil production. Doy1 Miller Cit Administrator D%I:bwo attach n i r M E M O R A N D U M TO: Doyle Miller DATE: June 15, 1970 City Administrator FROM: Frank B. Arguello Director of Finance SUBJECT: Proposed Revision of Refuse Collection Ordinance At the Council meeting of 6-1-70, we were asked to compile data concerning the effect of the addition of apartments and mobile home dwelling units to our present refuse collection fee structure. We find from discussion with our refuse collection contractor that there is a wide variance in charges to present apartment complexes and mobile home courts. Effectively, each unit has a different rate charge and as such would create a real problem if we were to use the same struc- ture in relationship to charges levied against these added dwelling units. The first problem we encounter is that our present ordinance is aimed at the user (who also pays a water bill) and, therefore, any charge can be added to the present utility bill. Since most apartmentsor mobile homes do not have a separate meter for each unit, if we were to levy a fee on those units for refuse collection, we would be charging the owner and not the user. This would mean one of two things--either the owner adjust his rental by the amount of the charge or the owner would collect the fee and remit to City. Either case does not follow our present ordi- nance which is user-oriented. The second problem we encounter is the problem as to how much we should charge. If we charge the same $1.50 per month per unit, we would be creating a larger "profit" in this area than we do on our present structure, since unit costs would be less than our usual $1.40 per unit. If we' charge a rate which would give us the same 10c "profit" ($1.50 charge, $1.40 cost) we would then have as many rates as we have complexes-- a situation which would be difficult and costly to administer. Effectively, our attorney and I have reached the conclusion that there are simply too many variables involved at this point which prohibits us from writing a usable ordinance. We believe that a study session should be scheduled with the City Council, or a Council Committee, in an effort to receive Council guidance as to their policy as concerns this problem. z Therefore, until we can receive answers to our several questions, we cannot correctly evaluate the problem or give you adequate data con- cerning the possible revenue we might derive from such a revision of our present ordinance. I would appreciate an early opportunity to further discuss this with both you and the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Frank B. Arguello Director of Finance FBA/b t M E M O R A N D U M TO: Doyle Miller DATE: June 12, 1970 City Administrator FROM: Frank B. Arguello Director of Finance SUBJECT: Business License - Methods of Determining Fee As requested by the City Council at the meeting of June 1, 1970, I hereby submit for your perusal and study data which should assist you in determining which rate structure is to be used by the City in deter- , mining business license fees. Schedule I indicates what some cities are currently using as a rate structure in the retail area The first six examples are what some cities are currently using. The seventh structure would be my recom- mendation for use in the city if we should desire to maintain some form of equity with other Orange County cities. Schedule II is a comparison of the seven rate structures listed in schedule I and indicates the various fees which would be charged by a city as a result of a given dollar volume of sales. This schedule also indicates the percentage factor and relationship between gross receipts and the business license fee charged. As an example, $100,000 of gross receipts under method #1 would result in a fee of $52.50 which is .0525% of total gross receipts. On gross receipts of $7,000,000, the fee under method #1, would be $767.50, but the percentage relation- ship is now .0109% of gross receipts. Use of a decreasing rate per $1,000 appears to be most acceptable by most cities as compared to the Los Angeles method which applies the same rate to the first dollar as it does to the last. Given the same example as above, but now using method #3, the result would be; on $100,000 of gross receipts the fee would be $100.00, on $7,000,000 of gross receipts the fee would be $7,000.00--the percentage relationship would be the same on both instances, i.e. , .10% of gross receipts. Obviously this method generates the greatest volume of revenue but is very likely to be detrimental to businesses in our area, especially if compared to rates of other Orange County cities. Schedule III is a listing of a majority of businesses in our city and indicates the number of businesses in each category, the lowest and highest fee paid by category, and the total fees paid by category. It becomes very clear that over 70% of businesses of all categories pay the minimum, or $25.00, in our city. T Doyle Miller June 12, 1970 Page 2 Schedule IV indicates our present method of determining business license fees and shows how many employees, on an average, it takes to generate a given dollar of revenue. As an example, if a firm has 20 employees, the license fee would be $59.50. This schedule also selects certain rates and indicates what gross receipts would have to be to be equivalent to a given dollar fee generated by the average employee method. As an example; a firm with 12 employees would pay a fee of $47.50, the same firm at 25G per $1,000 would have to gen- erate gross receipts of $115,000 to be equivalent, at 500 it would be $70,000, etc. This should give some indication as to the effect on individual businesses as verious rates are applied. I Schedule V indicates the fee which would be charged by dollar volume . under several possible rates. As an example, a firm with $69,000 of gross receipts would pay $36.00 @ 25C per $1,000, $47.00 @ 50c, $58.00 @ 75C, etc. . Schedule VI demonstrates the comparison between our present rate structure and seven other cities plus the structures I would recommend. As an example, a business doing $7,000,000 of business in our city now pays from $82.50 to $346.50 but would pay $767.50 in Anaheim, $777.50 in Buena Park, $200 in Costa Mesa, $805 in Santa Ana, $651.25 in Fuller- ton, $635.00 in Orange and $7,000 in Los Angeles. Our recommended structure would increase the fee to $781.00. This schedule demonstrates, in comparison with the selected cities, just how low our present business license fees are. I selected a few actual businesses and applied their present gross receipts to the rate structures of the selected cities to determine what fee would be paid in those particular cities. This schedule points out very quickly the extent of variation between our city and some of the cities who have demonstrated the ability to draw business into their respective areas which naturally, results in increased city revenue. The argument that an increase in our fees would drive business out--or keep it from coming into our city--doesn' t appear to have any validity in light of presented facts. Schedule VII consists of several rate structures which we might consider in our City. Our only problem is attempting to set a rate structure for the oil producing category and I have, therefore, shown three different examples and approaches. Rate #4 is on a per barrel rate whereas all others are on dollar volume. Rate #5 is a rate structure which would generate, effectively, the same revenue as rate #4 but now on a dollar volume. Rate #6 is based on dollar volume but at a level consistent with other businesses in our City. It is possible that use of rate #4 or #5 might generate charges of prejudice, discrimination or unreasonable- ness as regards the oil industry. I Doyle Miller June 12, 1970 Page 3 It' would appear that we are now faced with the problem of determining just how much, if anything, we can expect to derive from the oil industry. If we expect to receive in excess of $300,000 per year, then we should very likely remove this from the business license portion and institute a separate oil production license fee. If we plan to look at the oil industry strictly as another form of business, then we should use rate #6 and leave it within the proposed business license format. Using #6 we could expect something in the neighborhood of $14,000 per year, with the independent oil operator paying about $4,300 of total fees received. On the other hand, if we use the oil production license fee at 2C per barrel, we could expect something in the neighborhood of $300,000 per year. i Schedule VIII demonstrates effect on several categories of business on the same dollar volume of gross receipts. I As a rough estimate, therefore, I believe we could increase revenue through suggested revisions by: 1. All business (incl. oil) on gross receipts $106,000 2. All business (excl. oil) $ 92,000 Add oil production license fee at 2C 300,000 392,000 To finance $10,000,000 of capital improvements, our cost would be about $1,060,000 per year to be made up of: i Refuse charge $502,000 5C on property tax 165,000 #2 above 392,000 $1,059,000 If it is decided to forego the oil production license fee, we would generate revenue as follows: Refuse charge $502,000 5C on property tax 165,000 #1 - Business license 106,000 $ 773,000 Needed to finance 1,060,000 Shortage $ 287,000 I hope that the attached information plus the above statements and examples will help clarify the problem facing us, and I would be most pleased to discuss this further with either you or the City Council or both. Respectfully submitted, J � J Frank B. A guello Director of Finance FBA/b Attach: Schedules (8) SCHEDULE I City of Huntington Beach Possible Rate Structures Retail Trades i #1 First 25,000 @ 1.00 per thousand, minimum 25.00 Next 50,000 @ .40 " of Next 50,000 @ .30 " of Next 100,000 @ .20 " of Next 100,000 @ .15 " of Next 200,000 @ .125 " to All over 525,000 @ .10 per thousand #2 First. 25,000 @ 1.00 per thousand,, minimum 25.00 . Next 50,000 @ .50 it Next 50,000 @ .40 it Next 100,000 @ .30 " of Next 100,000 @ .20 " Next 200,000 @ .15 " All over 525,000 @ .10 per thousand #3 First 25,000 @ 1.00 per thousand, minimum 25.00 All others @ 1.00 " #4 First 25,000 @ 1.00 per thousand, minimum 25.00 All others @ .50 " #5 First 100,000 @ .50 per thousand, minimum 15.00 Next 400,000 @ .30 " to Next 500,000 @ .20 " of Next 1,000,000 @ .15 " to Over 2,000,000 @ .10 " #6 First 10,000 @ 2.50 per thousand, minimum 25.00 Next 15,000 @ .40 " of Next 25,000 @ .30 " Next 50,000 @ .20 Next 200,000 @ .15 " Next 450,000 @ .125 " All over 750,000 @ .10 per thousand #7. First 60,000 @ .50 per thousand, minimum 30.00 Next +0,000 @ .40 " it Next 100,000 @ .30 " Next 100,000 @ .20 " Next 200,000 @ .15 " Next 200,000 @ .125 " All over 700,000 @ .10 per thousand T SCHEDULE 11 City of Huntington Beach Comparison of Possible Rate Structures ^ Retail Businesses #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 of % of % of % of % of % of % of Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales 10,000 25.00 .25 25.00 .25 25.00 .25 25.00 .25 15.00 .15 25.00 .25 30.00 .30 15,000 25.00 .15 25.00 .16 25.00 .16 25.00 .16 15.00 .10 27.00 .18 30.00 .20 20,000 25.00 .125 25.00 .125 25.00 .125 25.00 .125 15.00 .0750 29.00 .145 30.00 .15 25,000 25.00 .10 25.00 .10 25.00 .10 25.00 .10 15.00 .0600 31.00 .1240 30.00 .12 30,000 27.00 .09 27.50 .0916 30.00 .10 27.50 .0916 15.00 .0500 32.50 .1083 30.00 .10 35,000 29.00 .0828 30.00 .0857 35.00 .10 30.00 .0857 17.50 .0500. 34.00 .0971 30.00 .0857 40,000 31.00 .0775 32.50 .0812 40.00 .10 32.50 .0812 20.00 .0500 35.50 .0887 30.00 .0750 45,000 33.00 .0733 35.00 .0777 45.00 -.10 35.00 .0777 22.50 .0500 37.00 .0822 30.00 .0666 50,000 35.00 .0700 37.50 .0750 50.00 .10 37.50 .0750 25.00 .0500 38.50 .0770 30.00 .0600 60,000 39.00 .0650 42.50 .0708 60.00 .10 42.50 .0708 30.00 .0500 40.50 .0675 30.00 .0500 70,000 43.00 .0614 47.50 .0678 70.00 .10 47.50 .0678 35.00 .0500 42.50 .0607 34.00 .0485 80,000 46.50 .0581 52.00 .0650 80.00 .10 52.50 .0656 40.00 .0500 44.50 .0556 38.00 .0475 90,000 49.50 .0550 56.00 .0622 90.00 .10 57.50 .0638 45.00 .0500 46.50 .0516 42.00 .0466 100,000 52.50 .0525 60.00 .0600 100.00 .10 62.50 .0625 50.00 .0500 48.50 .0485 46.00 .0460 125,000 60.00 .0480 70.00 .0560 125.00 .10 75.00 .0600 57.50 .0460 52.25 .0418 53.50 .0428 150,000 65.00 .0433 77.50 .0516 150.00 .10 87.50 .0583 65.00 .0433 56.00 .0373 61.00 .0406 175,000 70.00 .0400 85.00 .0485 175.00 .10 100.00 .0571 72.50 .0414 59.75 .0341 68.50 .0391 200,000 75.00 .0375 92.50 .0462 200.00 .10 112.50 .0562 80.00 .0400 63.50 .0317 76.00 .0380 250,000 83.75 .0335 105.00 .0420 250.00 .10 137.50 .0550 95.00 .0380 67.25 .0269 86.00 .0344 300,000 91.25 .0304 115.00 .0383 300.00 .10 162.50 .0541 110.00 .0366 71.00 .0236 96.00 .0322 350,000 98.13 .0280 123.75 .0353 350.00 .10 187.50 .0535 125.00 .0357 76.25 .0217 103.50 .0295 400,000 104.38 .0260 131.25 .0328 400.00 .10 212.50 .0531 140.00 .0350 82.50 .0206 111.00 .0277 500,000 116.88 .0233 146.25 .0292 500.00 .10 262.50 .0525 155.00 .0310 95.00 .0190 126.00 .0252 600,000 127.50 .0212 157.50 .0262 600.00 .10 312.50 .0520 175.00 .0291 107.50 .0179 138.50 .0230 700,000 137.50 .0196 167.50 .0239 700.00 .10 362.50 .0517 195.00 .0278 120.00 .0171 151.00 .0215 800,000 147.50 .0184 177.50 .0221 800.00 ..10 412.50 .0515 215.00 .0268 131.25 .0164 161.00 .0201 900,000 157.50 .0175 187.50 .0208 900.00 .10 462.50 .0513 235.00 .0261 141.25 .0156 171.00 .0190 1,000,000 167.50 .0167 197.50 .0197 1,000.00 .10 512.50 .0512 255.00 .0255 151.25 .0151 181.00 .0181 1,500,000 217.50 .0145 247.50 .0165 1,500.00 .10 762.50 .0508 330.00 .0220 201.25 .0134 231.00 .0154 2,000,000 267.50 .0133 297.50 .0148 2,000.00 .10 1,012.50 .0506 405.00 .0202 251.25 .0125 281.00 .0140 2,500,000 317.50 .0127 347.50 .0139 2,500.00 .10 1,262.50 .0505 455.00 .0182 301.25 .0120 331.00 .0132 -1- J- SCHEDULE II (con't) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 % of % of % of % of % of % of % of Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee. Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales Fee Sales 3,000,000 367.50 .0122 397.50 .0132 3,000.00 .10 17512.50 .0504 505.00 .0168 351.25 .0117 381.00 .0127 3,500,000 417.50 .0119 447.50 .0127 3,500.00 .10 1,762.50 .0503 555.00 .0158 401.25 .0114 431.00 .0123 4,000,000 467.50 .0116 497.50 .0124 4,000.00 .10 2,012.50 .0503 605.00 .0151 451.25 .0112 481.00 .0120 4,500,000 517.50 .0115 547.50 .0121 4,500.00 .10 2,262.50 .0502 655.00 .0145 501.25 .0111 531.00 .0118 57000,000 567.50 .0113 597.50 .0119 5,000.00 .10 2,512.50 .0502 705.00 .0141 551.25 .0110 581.00 .0116 5,500,000 617.50 .0112 647.50 .0117 5,500.00 .10 2,762.50 .0502 755.00 .0137 601.25 .0109 631.00 .0114 6,000,000 667.50 .0111 697.50 .0116 6,000.00 .10 3,012.50 .0502 805.00 .0134 651.25 .0108 681.00 .011- 6,500,000 717.50 .0110 747.50 .0115 6,500.00 .10 3,262.50 .0501 855.00 .0131 701.25 .0107 731.00 .011 7,000,000 767.50 .0109 797.50 .0113 7,000.00 .10 3,512.50 .0501 905.00 .0129 751.25 .0107 781.00 .0111 7,500,000 817.50 .0109 847.50 .0113 7,500.00 .10 3,762.50 .0501 955.00 .0127 801.25 .0106 831.00 .0110 8,000,000 867.50 .0108 897.50 .0112 8,000.00 .10 4,012.50 .0501 1,055.00 .0131 851.25 .0106 881.00 .0110 9,000,000 967.50 .0107 997.50 .0110 9,000.00 .10 4,512.50 .0501 1,155.00 .0128 951.25 .0105 981.00 .0109 10,000,000 1,067.50 .0106 1,097.50 .0109 10,000.00 .10 5,012.50 .0501 1,255.00 .0125 1,051.25 .0105 1,081.00 .0108 -2- 1 City of Huntington Beach Examples and Comparison of Existing Businesses and Fees Paid No. of Fee Total Retail Businesses Low High Fees Grocery Stores 35 25.00 119.00 1,709.50 Men's Clothing 9 25.00 59.50 297.00 Women's Clothing 34 25.00 42.50 890.00 Children's Clothing 2 25.00 25.00 50.00 Auto - New 12 25.00 139.50 735.50 Auto - Used 3 25.00 67.00 144.50 Auto - Parts 22 25.00 35.00 565.00 Hardware 6 25.00 40.00 170.00 Drug Store 16 25.00 74.50 603.50 Department Store 12 25.00 505.50 1,643.50 Mobile Home 9 25.00 134.00 351.50 Furniture 15 25.00 350.50 743.50 Sales Specialty Items 146 25.00 90.50 3,843.00 Catering - Vending 43 25.00 1,968.00 4027.00 Wholesale Food 14 25.00 290.50 781.50 Clothing 2 25.00 25.00 50.00 Appliances 4 25.00 25.00 100.00 Carpets/Drapes 9 25.00 25.00 225.00 Building Materials 1 25.00 25.00 25.00 Professional Doctors 93 25.00 49.00 2,354.00 Dentists 54 25.00 27.50 1,352.50 Attorneys 17 25.00 27.50 427.50 Optometrists 10 25.00 25.00 250.00 Mortuary 2 25.00 37.50 62.50 Engineers 27 25.00 92.50 801.50 Service Barbers 28 25.00 37.50 692.50 Auto Repair 25 25.00 100.00 765.00 Plumber 2 25.00 35.00 60.00 Ambulance 3 25.00 37.50 97.50 Insurance 12 25.00 52.00 334.50 Hospitals 6 25.00 205.50 472.00 Real Estate Sales 77 25.00 59.50 1,987.00 Apartments 479 2.50 465.00 8,227.50 Motels 4 10.50 75.00 126.50 Hotels 6 3.50 216.00 268.50 Brokers 2 25.00 25.00 50.00 -1- No. of Fee Total Manufacturing Businesses Low High Fees Plastics 7 25.00 74.50 362.50 Metal 16 25.00 89.50 571.50 Electronics 19 25.00 7,917.50 89598.50 Oil Production 9 25.00 480.50 1,022.00 Direct Sales Mail Order Sales 37 25.00 37.50 937.50 Contractors Gen 1 - Engineering 259 25.00 70.00 99673.50 Gen' l - Building 80 25.00 70.00 2,892.50 Electrical 209 25.00 35.00 5,835.00 Heat/Refrigeration 91 25.00 35.00 2,732.50 Metal Work 70 25.00 35.00 29060.00 Landscaping 79 25.00 35.00 21325.00 Painting/Plastering 142 25.00 35.00 49242.50 Masonry 153 25.00 35.00 49605.00 Plumbing 148 25.00 35.00 4,247.50 Drilling 12 25.00 35.00 390.00 Misc. - Specialty 249 25.00 35.00 7,765.00 Wheel Tax 1,371 25.00 160.00 38,308.00 i -2- City of Huntington Beach SCHEDULE IV Business License Present Method - Average # of Employees Comparison of Rates Cost @ Cost Cost Cost Cost Ave # of @ 25c @ 50c @ 75c @ $1.00 No. of Emp Employees per $1,000 per $1,000 per $1,000 per $1,000 1-3 25.00 4 27.50 5 30.00 6 32.50 7 35.00 8 37.50 9 40.00 10 42.50 11 45.00 12 47.50 115,000 70,000 55,000 47,500 13 49.00 14 50.50 15 52.00 16 53.50 17 55.00 18 56.50 19 58.00 20 59.50 21 61.00 22 62.50 175,000 100,000 75,000 62,500 23 64.00 24 65.50 25 67.00 26 68.50 27 70.00 28 71.50 29 73.00 30 74.50 31 76.00 32 77.50 235,000 130,000 95,000 77,500 33 79.00 34 80.50 35 82.00 36 83.50 37 85.00 38 86.50 39 88.00 40 89.50 41 91.00 42 92.50 295,000 160,000 115,000 92,500 43 94.00 44 95.50 45 97.00 313,000 169,000 121,000 97,000 46 99.50 47 101.00 48 102.50 49 104.00 50 105.50 347,000 186,000 132,333 105,500 51 107.00 52 108.50 53 109.50 54 110.50 55 111.50 56 112.50 57 113.50 58 114.50 59 115.50 60 116.50 391,000 208,000 147,000 116,500 70 126.50 80 136.50 90 146.50 100 156.50 200 256.50 300 356.50 400 456.50 500 556.50 2,151,000 1,088,000 7339666 556,500 600 656.50 700 756.50 800 856.50 900 956.50 1,000 1,056.50 City of Huntington Beach Business License -- Gross Receipts Method Comparison of Price Structures Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 25c 50C 75c 1.00 1.50 1/4 mill) (1/2 mill) (3/4 mill) (1 mill) (1� mill) 25,000 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 26,000 25.25 25.50 25.75 26.00 26.50 27,000 25.50 26.00 26.50 27.00 28.00 28,000 25.75 26.50 27.25 28.00 29.50 29,000 26.00 27.00 28.00 29.00 31.00 30,000 26.25 27.50 28.75 30.00 32.50 31,000 26.50 28.00 29.50 31.00 34.00 32,000 26.75 28.50 30.25 32:00 35.50 33,000 27.00 29.00 31.00 33.00 37.00 34,000 27.25 29.50 31.75 34.00 38.50 35,000 27.50 30.00 32.50 35.00 40.00 36,000 27.75 30.50 33.25 36.00 41.50 37,000 28.00 31.00 34.00 37.00 43.00 38,000 28.25 31.50 34.75 38.00 44.50 39,000 28.50 32.00 35.50 39.00 46.00 40,000 28.75 32.50 36.25 40.00 47.50 41,000 29.00 33.00 37.00 41.00 49.00 42,000 29.25 33.50 37.75 42.00 50.50 43,000 29.50 34.00 38.50 43.00 52.00 44,000 29.75 34.50 39.25 44.00 53.50 45,000 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 55.00 46,000 30.25 35.50 40.75 46.00 56.50 47,000 30.50 36.00 41.50 47.00 58.00 48,000 30.75 36.50 42.25 48.00 59.50 49,000 31.00 37.00 43.00 49.00 61.00 50,000 31.25 37.50 43.75 50.00 62.50 51,000 31.50 38.00 44.50 51.00 64.00 52,000 31 75 38.50 45.25 52.00 65.50 53,000 32.00 39.00 46.00 53.00 67.00 54,000 32.25 39.50 46.75 54.00 68.50 55,000 32.50 40.00 47.50 55.00 70.00 56,000 32.75 40.50 48.25 56.00 71.50 57,000 33.00 41.00 49.00 57.00 73.00 58,000 33.25 41.50 49.75 58.00 74.50 59,000 33.50 42.00 50.50 59.00 76.00 60,000 33.75 42.50 51.25 60.00 77.50 61,000 34.00 43.00 52.00 61.00 79.00 62,000 34.25 43.50 52.75 62.00 80.50 63,000 34.50 44.00 53.50 63.00 82.00 64,000 34.75 44.50 54.25 64.00 83.50 65,000 35.00 45.00 55.00 65.00 85.00 66,000 35.25 45.50 55.75 66.00 86.50 67,000 35.50 46.00 56.50 67.00 88.00 68,000 35.75 46.50 57.25 68.00 89.50 69,000 36.00 47.00 58.00 69.00 91.00 -1- Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 Per $1,000 25C 50C 75C 1.00 1.50 (1/4 mill) (1/2 mill) (3/4 mill) (1 mill) (1� mill) 70,000 36.25 47.50 58.75 70.00 92.50 71,000 36.50 48.00 59.50 71.00 94.00 72,000 36.75 48.50 60.25 72.00 95.50 73,000 37.00 49.00 61.00 73.00 97.00 74,000 37.25 49.50 61.75 74.00 98.50 75,000 37.50 50.00 62.50 75.00 100.00 76,000 37.75 50.50 63.25 76.00 101.50 77,000 38.00 51.00 64.00 77.00 103.00 78,000 38.25 51.50 64.75 78.00 104.50 79,000 38.50 52.00 65.50 79.00 106.00 80,000 38.75 52.50 66.25 80.00 107.50 81,000 39.00 53.00 67.00 81.00 109.00 82,000 39.25 53.50 67.75 82.00 110.50 83,000 39.50 54.00 68.50 83.00 112.00 84,000 39.75 54.50 69.25 84.00 113.50 85,000 40.00 55.00 70.00 85.00 115.00 86,000 40.25 55.50 70.75 86.00 116.50 87,000 40.50 56.00 71.50 87.00 118.00 88,000 40.75 56.50 72.25 88.00 119.50 89,000 41.00 57.00 73.00 89.00 121.00 90,000 41.25 57.50 73.75 90.00 122.50 91,000 41.50 58.00 74.50 91.00 124.00 92,000 41.75 58.50 75.25 92.00 125.50 93,000 42.00 59.00 76.00 93.00 127.00 94,000 42.25 59.50 76.75 94.00 128.50 95,000 42.50 60.00 77.50 95.00 130.00 96,000 42.75 60.50 78.25 96.00 131.50 97,000 43.00 61.00 79.00 97.00 133.00 98,000 43.25 61.50 79.75 98.00 134.50 99,000 43.50 62.00 80.50 99.00 136.00 100,000 43.75 62.50 81.25 100.00 137.50 200,000 68.75 112.50 156.25 200.00 287.50 300,000 93.75 162.50 231.25 300.00 437.50 400,000 118.75 212.50 306.25 400.00 587.50 500,000 143.75 262.50 381.25 500.00 737.50 600,000 168.75 312.50 456.25 600.00 887.50 700,000 193.75 362.50 531.25 700.00 1,037.50 800,000 218.75 412.50 606.25 800.00 1,187.50 900,000 243.75 462.50 681.25 900.00 1,337.50 1,000,000 268.75 512.50 756.25 1,000.00 1,487.50 2,000,000 518.75 1,012.50 1,266.25 2,000.00 2,987.50 i ' I -2- SCHEDULE VI City of Huntington Beach Comparison of Existing Fees By City Proposed HB Buena Costa Santa Los for Present Anaheim Park Mesa Ana Fullerton Orange Angeles HB 100,000 25.00 52.50 47.50 60.00 50.00 48.50 50.00 100.00 46.00 200,000 27.50 75.00 59.50 60.00 80.00 63.50 55.00 200.00 76.00 300,000 40.00 91.25 67.50 100.00 110.00 71.00 65.00 300.00 96.00 400,000 104.38 87.50 100.00 140.00 82.50 75.00 400.00 111.00 500,000 116.88 107.50 100.00 175.00 95.00 85.00 500.00 126.00 1,000,000 167.50 177.50 200.00 255.00 151.25 135.00 1,000.00 181.00 2,000,000 267.50 277.50 200.00 405.00 251.25 235.00 2,000.00 281.00 39000,000 367.50 377.50 200.00 505.00 351.25 335.00 3,000.00 381.00 4,000,000 467.50 477..50 200.00 605.00 451.25 435.00 4,000.00 481.00 5,000,000 567.50 577.50 200.00 705.00 551.25 535.00 5,000.00 581.00 6,000,000 139.50 667.50 677.50 200.00 805.00 651.25 635.00 6,000.00 681.00 7,000,000 82.50-346.50 767.50 777.50 200.00 905.00 751.25 735.00 7,000.00 781.00 8,000,000 405.50 867.50 877.50 200.00 1,005.00 851.25 835.00 8,000.00 881.00 9,000,000 505.50 - 967.50 977.50 200.00 1,105.00 951.25 935.00 9,000.00 981.00 10,000,000 600.00 1,067.50 1,077.50 200.00 1,205.00 1,051.25 1,035.00 10,000.00 1,081.00 City of Huntington Beach Examples of Business License Fees Gross Receipts Method Retailers Example #1 Gross Receipts Fee 30,000 30.00 50,000 30.00 100,000 46.00 500,000 126.00 1,000,000 181.00 10,000,000 1,081.00 i Wholesalers & Manufacturing Example #2 30,000 30.00 50,000 30.00 100,000 42.00 500,000 67.70 1,000,000 129.20 10,000,000 1,029.20 Professional Example #3 30,000 30.00 50,000 36.00 100,000 42.00 500,000 82.50 1,000,000 132.50 10,000,000 1,032.50 Oil Production I Example #4 Fee #4 400 barrels 30.00 1,000 to42.00 10,000 of222.00 100,000 it2,022.00 11000,000 it20,022.00 10,000,000 if200,022.00 Fee #5 $ 30,000 60.00 50,000 100.00 100,000 2,000.00 500,000 10,000.00 1,000,000 20,000.00 10,000,000 200,000.00 Fee #6 $ 30,000 30.00 50,000 40.00 100,000 65.00 500,000 85.00 1,000,000 285.00 10,000,000 1,272.50 City of Huntington Beach Schedule of Fees Retailers #1 First 60,000 @ .50 per thousand, minimum 30.00 Next 40,000 @ .40 " Next 100,000 @ .30 it Next 100,000 @ .20 " of Next 200,000 @ .15 it Next 200,000 @ .125 " All over 700,000 @ .10 " #2 Manufacturers d Wholesalers First 60,000 @ .50 per thousand, minimum 30.00 Next 140,000 @' .30 it Next 200,000 @ .15 " of Next 200,000 @ .125 " of All over 600,000 @. .10 it #3 Professional First 30,000 @ 1.00 per thousand, minimum 30.00 Next 30,000 @ .30 it Next 50,000 @ .15 " of All over 110,000 @ .10 " 464 Oil Producers First 400 barrels @ 7�K per barrel, minimum 30.00 If All other @ 2C " #5 Oil Producers First 15,000 @ 2.00 per thousand, minimum 30.00 All other @ 2.00 it #6 Oil Producers First 30,000 @ 1.00 per thousand, minimum 30.00 Next 470,000 @ .50 " to Next 500,000 @ .40 it Next 500,000 @ .30 if Next 500,000 @ .20 " It Next 500,000 @ .15 " Next 500,000 @ .125 goI Next 500,000 @ .10 " i _ 1 November 9 , 1970 TO : City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Ordinance Repealing Fees For Refuse Collection As directed by Council, we transmit herewith a proposed ordinance repealing Article 325 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code relating to fees for trash collection. Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB :lm Attachment j . }. .i., . .:I i%- .. ,. . : I. .1 -. -.1,.' - ' t Y .' -t - T -.:.-I,...-,-­. x - t' 1 i _ It _- - - , _ _ ' _ August �10, 1970; -' f -iF Y -� l u1 - ! - j - - f ,. r. _ .. .- t _ -*.S. - S- ii Ii s a' 'Western 'R fuse Hau-lingr Inc. - P.;0. Box 214 Gardena, CA 90247 E s t Gentlemen:: ` - . ,� _ . : . . � V The City Council of Hunt•, each,-, ..at its regular meeting head July _. . . 0, g anted:'your request, to withdraw your` appl It o . rtificate of :Publ'ic Need r ' and;.Necess=ity.. .for s.h d os in the City-=of Hunting A - "ton `.Beach: t. " ". I L We are return er i your. License .Bond -filed in - . ' com it b'de . -t ect on 2112.2.3 of he °Huntington Beach Ordinance I- d - f , �. t. s incere ly_:-y0 4. - -` f _ _ ay - i'. T j ' PPaul:`C. Jones t •.., .. . . Cityy.Clerk ' ,. -a _ �t _ - y' i r -r .. -PCJ:�1 Y'_ Enc ,4 'S ;..: . . r . t - --' I. ":. a .. - - _ - - - -x_s i 1. - i _ - �- ! _ - --s.. 1 i T ' - ' it' '..�. 7. r . City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •°�� May 27, 1970R� R' 3W Honorable Mayor Y and City Council �'� rT9 ?d City of Huntington Beach WYO Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Subject: Glass bottles and Aluminum Can collection Dear Mr. Miller: We have made an investigation of the collection of glass bottles and aluminum cans with the thought of saving our diminishing natural resources and gaining financial benefit from the sale of this waste. If we required that individual homeowners segregate the refuse at the point of collection, we would be confronted with two major obstacles. First, when the idea. is new, most homeowners would comply, but would gradually shift back to non-segregation. Second, it would require a double pickup; one truck collecting regular refuse and another truck collecting the bottles and cans. At the present time, there are no commercial firms set up to purchase these bottles and cans in large quantities because there isn't the market for this reusable refuse. Therefore, the cost of pickup outstrips the salvage value. The County of Orange was asked if they were doing any investigation or research on the segregation and salvage of reusable refuse at the dump sites. They say that as yet it is uneconomical. The only method of making reusable refuse collection economical is using free labor as provided by the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, schools, and service organizations. Until the cost for disposal of refuse goes up and there is increased salvage value of the reusables, salvage is uneconomical. truly yours, /l es R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:DGB:mp D-/ Students for Ecological Action Marina High School Miss Dolores DeCastro 4. 15871 Springdale Street Huntington Beach, California 92647 April 28, 1970 The Honorable Donald D. Shipley, Mayor of Huntington Beach The City Council City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Mayor: The activities of last week concerning Ecology have pointed out the trouble in our environment. These activities will have been in vain if no positive, long term action is taken. Reclamation of wast6s is one area in dire need of attention. There is a market for used papers, bottles and aluminum cans. As a group of concerned students, we would like to request that the city council put this problem on its agenda and discuss the feasibility of including in the contract with Rainbow Disposal a clause which will require them to reclaim as much as possible. We are c6ntinuing to gather information concerning the problem of trash disposal and reclamation of trash and would like the opportunity to participate in or listen to the discussion of the City Council when they are able to deal with this problem. Thank you very much. Sin erely, iss Dolores DeCastro / Sponsor 114--.4,' 4 T 7%3 O /"Om , ir-- evD s s/sz E �Bo�T 3o s Tvv •v�-s VII-Z ;YC P2A=54;n/T 0 A. S. KOCH C ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR U NTY O F L. MC CO COMMISSIONER R. V. WISE ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR O O W,L. ZAUN T,P. O'BRIEN DIVISION ENGINEER- OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL EN OINEER FLAN Gi E M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER-ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER TELEPHONE: 834-3456 ® AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIF RNIA 92701 August 21, 1969 To: Refuse Maulers Using Transfer Stations Subject: Closure of Transfer Stations on September 1, 1969 In accordance with County of Orange policy, all transfer stations will be closed September 1, 1989 and opened on September 6, 1969. A. S. KOCH Road Commissioner and County Surveyor Itfo By T. P. O'Brien Refuse Disposal Engineer TPO:sm Q - A. S. KOCH -ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR C L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE U NTY O■ ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR ® 4O W.L. ZAUN T,P, O'BRIEN I DIVISION ENGINEER- OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER FLAN Q E M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER-ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER TELEPHONE_: 834.3456 O AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST OTH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 June 20, 1969 To: Refuse Haulers Using Transfer Stations Subject: Closure of Transfer Stations on July 4, 1969 In,accordance with County of Orange policy, all transfer stations will be closed July 4, 1969 and opened on July 5, 1969. A. S. KOCH :Road Commissioner and County Surveyor By T. P. O'Brien Refuse Disposal Engineer TPO:ja b %��C co?, A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR .rly O^ L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE U N �! ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR O O W.L. ZAUN T.P. O'BRIEN DIVISION ENGINEER- OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER FLANGE M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER-ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER TELEPHONE; 834.3455 _ O AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST ETH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 - I November 18, 1968 To: All Cities of Orange County All Sanitation Districts of Orange County All Waste Collectors of Orange County From: Road Department Refuse Disposal Engineer Subject: Refuse Disposal Facilities - Holidays As a reminder, all the Orange County Disposal Facilities (landfill sites and transfer stations) will be closed on Thanksgiving Day, November 28, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. The Olinda and Coyote Disposal Stations will be open from 6:00 a. m. to 8:00 p,m. on December 26, 27, 28 and 30. 1968. TPO:ja 01 August 1, '1968 1 • >. - - _ .A;. Parchman V .i:P :Rubbish Disposal.Service P'0: Box:1222 , Garden Grove,. California 92642 - r Dear'Ivlr'. 'Parchmam A. Regarding'bur.conversation concerning your application::fora Need and Necessity Certificates o.r commercial refuse collection, weficidas'_follows. The performance bond required in.,the ordinance in the ,amount.of $:101 000.was put in as a:irequirement to better,,control:,tfie,.number D : of.o operators and quality of service that would-become available -within our city. if you-still'wish;to operate a coinmerciai service`it wily tie: necessary;.for�you to comply with the ordinance....:Your application for. a Certificate of Need and Necessity will have to be accompanied .by-a "performance bond an the amount of $109 000;and a $25 fee. for. processing the application: In addition, it;.will.be necessary for you to:buy the required business license, 4 . I ofany of,these conditam sorry:that weannot relieve y ions. Yours very. truly, `Brander D Castle Acting City Administrator SDC:bwo `CC. `Cit Clerk: ------------ YOU CALL WE-MAUL j CONTAINERS FURNISHED' •-,�/ V. I. P. RUBBISH DISPOSAL SERVICE Y GARDEN GROVE DOTTIE PARCHNrAN CALIFORNIA 92642 714 638-9601 : . July a4, e;1968. .:'W.-A. Parchman " .I::F`. Rubbish Disposal:. Service P.Q:_. Box 1122 -G7rove,,.. California, 94642 Dear .�Mr,. _Tarcbiiian:- We are holding a deposit* -ins-the' amount of $5.-.00 :for a certificate of public need and::necessity for:, trash di's posal in. the City of--Huntington Beach. _We informed- Mrs . Parchman by- telephone;-oa Friday,`A July la, 1968, ;that 'upon; receipt. of'- the additional $2.fl.00 required . for ",filing a. cor illtci to of need. an+d" necessity and return `of the raw ' ce3.pt foie the $5,a0 :already paid, we would Trite a rec`efipc Qfor.•the full amount ;. At that time you must .submit a performance bond in the awaurt ©f $10,060,- to ether with your application, as :re qui ie6d -by.'Section 3a6 of the Huntin ton' Beach. Ordinance Code If. you do not �f i.le this with'_the City..Clerk by.5:00, P.M. ,on° �Ionda`y,, July�2�, 196.$, and d o not appear .:to, surrender your -redo ' _for the .$ oo) .we +ill .deposit your money with the City Treasurer.:and as ,.that you do ,not wish to pursue this matter-;:;further'. Sincerely yours., Paul C. Jones City,:Clerk kitaw:cb l - _._ APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Y City of Huntington Beach �oUNT1 POST OFFICE BOX 190 SIXTH @ PECAN STREETS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 TEL. S36-6551 Please Print or Type Application is hereby made by /'y ' /7/g U �r��/�1�/y —to conduct the business of / ,�6��/ Street,treat, this City. The proper name of this business will be ' License has/has not been previously issued for similar business at the above address. If you are required to hold State of California License, give number State of California Board of Equalization Permit (EA) number If the applicant is a firm or partnership, give the names and address of the members or the partners. If the applicant is an association give the names and addresses of the officers therof; if a Corporation, give the names of the Board of Direc- tors and Oficers thereof. (Attach sheet if more space required) Statement of Average Number of Employees That you will use in this City: / 7 Date That You Started or Will Start Business in this City: Number of vehicles used in this city to conduct your business with a Manufacturer's rated capacity oft. . . .�Z. .�0.1Y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 Ton or Under Number of Coin Operated Machines on premises: Over 1 Ton but under 3 Tons Music 3 Tons or Over Vending Number of Dwelling Units V o r Amusement (Apts., Motel Spaces, Rooms) Number of Trailer Spaces p/Q'k/Q Service Number of Rental Trailers �e �e Total Number of Rental Passenger Cars A �✓�— I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above statements are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, correct. I understand that the "Statement of Average Number of Employe of is written p Ity of perjury. Signature of Applicant Business Address: Z �Z_ Tel: 7/4 —. 1,35'0 d � Residence Address: `�` Tel: 772- �` l Z — — — REVERSE SIDE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY — — — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Classification of business Fee Date application submitted Application accepted by Distributed Approved Disapproved Planning Department Fire Department Building Department Police Department Health Officer License Number Granted Expires Decal Number(s) City Clerk Remarks: w . .'LICATION FOR CERTIFICATE r OF NEED AND NECESSITY a TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT : I. P 1. NAME Last G First Middle 2. Address - ' Street City State 3. Corporation Name 4. Business Name — O5 4 flf 5 Business Address J70 - D Street City St to A. If Corporation: 1. Principal place of business 2 . Name of Officers: a. b. c. B. If Partnership: 1. Principal place of business 2. Name of Partners : a. b. C. continued on page 2. II. Vehicle to be used - new or used? 1 . Descri tion of vehicle �GiO •1 �d,�'r7�G T _ 1_ d 2. Registered in Hunti gton Beach? 3 . Emergency Vehicle permit? p �o 4 . Insurance? III. Driver' s rate proposed? -f Vex 1 . Namesg 2 . Ages Names Ages 3. State of California Chauffeur' s Liscense Number? 4 . Current Advance First Aid Card or Certificate? IV. Schedule of Rate proposed? D ( YCJ ► (-y� 0 a in ee K c. j f�I ��a ,v�S JC�o RAID yr/�i lei 1/,&,w a . V. Other 2, TO BE FILLED OUT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT : I. Is the Applicant- of good moral character? a. Ever been convicted of a felony? b. Character reference c. Prior experience d. Educational background II. Does applicant and drivers-qualifications check according to application? III . Are vehicles insured and servicable as emergency equipment? IV. Is proposed rate schedule in line with other ambulance services? V. What are needs of City for ambulance service? Other services and type of service . 3. o 3 - - STANLEV E. KRAUSE DI R E CTO R )11...E i d tl Y C)F GEORGE H. CORMACK, SRA 2 MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2 _ JOSEPH A. HENNESSEY • 1.. /�, ACQUISITION DIVISION �H N1 Oi a - � JACK YOUNG, SRA VALUATION DIVISION 0 DEPARTMENT OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES 515 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET -SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (/ TELEPHONE, 834-2550 AREA CODE 714 5 May 14, 19 68 Project No: P. M. 108 Project: Refuse Disposal Site No. 14 Parcel Nos: 1 and 3 Orange County Board of Supervisors Department Heads District Heads Gentlemen: The two parcels of land located in the City of Huntington Beach, as shown shaded on the attached map, are surplus to the needs of the Refuse Disposal Division of the Road Department. The larger parcel, containing approximately- five acres, was formerly a gravel pit which was excavated to a depth of about 40 feet. The major portion of this parcel is covered with water ranging from 1 to 40 feet in depth. The lake formed on this parcel and some adjoining properties covers approximately 14. 5 acres. The smaller parcel contains 0.98 acres. It is landlocked, and the average elevation on three of its sides is more than 20 feet below the elevation of the surrounding land. Its westerly side is approximately 5 to 10 feet above the adjoining lake. If a County Department or District has a need of this property, please contact Mr. Matheny of this Department by May 31, 1968, and your request will be made known to the Board of Supervisors for their determination regarding the disposition of these parcels. Very truly yours;; __�STANLEY KRAUSE DIRECTOij REM/hs Encls r u N O O ►3 E� r c F H tl: - ►j . e GOLDENWEST STREET A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR U N � T O P L.ROAD COMMISSIONER R. V. WISE ASST. ROAD COMMISSION ER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR R. B. VAILE W. L. ZAUN DIVISION ENGINEER-OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER RANGE M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER-ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER TELEPHONE: 834-3455 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST STH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 January 9, 1968 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach City Hall - 5th & Orange Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: On December 31, 1967, the Orange County Refuse Disposal Station located near the intersection of Santiago Canyon Road and Silverado Canyon Road, was discontinued as a refuse disposal site. In lieu of this site a new facility, designated as the Santiago Disposal Station, was opened on January 2, 1968. The Santiago Disposal Station will be operated as a sanitary landfill disposal site. Class II and Class III refuse will be accepted for disposal including demolition material and trees and branches, if less than six feet in length. Operating hours will be from 6:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. , seven days per week, excepting New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas. The Station will.not be open on those days. Starting January 22, 1968, no refuse originating outside the Transfer Station limits, as shown on the attached map, will be hauled to a transfer station, but must be hauled directly to a landfill disposal station. The locations of all the County operated landfill disposal stations are also shown on the map. f' VeryAftly yours, S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor ASK:TOB:sm I Attach: t. COUNTY OF ORANGE January 2, 1968 ROAD DEPARTMENT T. P. O'Brien REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION Refuse Disposal Engineer 834-3466 LIST OF COUNTY DISPOSAL STATIONS Hours of Operations No. Location (7 days per week) Material Accepted 16. Cannery St. & 8:00 a:m. to 4:30 p. m. Unlimited quantities of inert material. No brush, Hamilton Ave. , tr ish, garbage or floatable debris. Huntington Beach 17. East of U. S. 101 6:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. Household and commercial trash, brush, inert and San Juan Creek, material. south of San Juan Capistrano 20. Valencia Ave.north 6:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. Household and commercial trash, brush, inert of Carbon Canyon material, tree stumps, logs and tree trunks under Road above Imperial si ic feet long. Highway. 24. Coyote Canyon south 6:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. Household and commercial trash, inert material, 1 of Bonita Canyon Road brush, tree stumps, logs under six feet long. 25. Santiago Canyon Road, 6:00 a. m. to 6:00 p. m. Household and commercial trash, brush, inert east of Chapman Ave. material. west of Santiago Reservoir (also known as Irvine Lake) Dumps closed on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas,Jan. 1 NOTE: Swill, dead animals, car bodies and liquid or industrial wastes are not acceptable at any County Disposal Station. Residential garbage, when integrated with trash in a mixture containing not more than 10% garbage by volume, may be delivered to Stations No. 17, 20, 24 & 25. Cannery and packing plant wastes are.accepted--by-individual arrangement with Disposal Office. No burning dump. pa OLIND 4 3 _.A rw _ a _ zz yP1 Y RrvERIDE FRWYy •I.. a-a+• 1 —E _r�___4r 4�\ .1 4-7 SANTIAG01 ..,n f ______-- �o I a 9 ��/� /f` /� � '` oS`•.a VAy'�F� --��a? -- ,�`•/ 9f ._ 3 I \ 1.... a"N" , `-GCOYOTE 7 CANYON MAP �� _ ORANGE COUNTY J '•� — :<_� . DISPOSAL FACILITIES • y _ ' i TRANSFER STATIONS STATION N2 HOURS OF OPERATION SERVICE AREA '• — — o I 7AM TO 4 PM (MON. THRU FRI.) ® _ r / II 7AM TO 4 PM (MON. THRU SAT.) ••� III 7AM TO 4PM (MON. THRU SAT.) LANDFILL DISPOSAL STATIONS 'R CAI�Y -- - -' " STATION HOURS OF OPERATION 2 i ' _a 1 QN I `<� FORST r CANNERY ST.. 8AM TO 4:30PM (SEVEN DAYS PER WEEK) COYOTE CANYON 6AM TO 6 PM FORSTER CANYON 11 11 11 ( It OLINDA 1. I 11 ( 11 SANTIAGO 1. It it ( " it I. ) v I �E SOLID FILL ONLY ALL FACILITIES CLOSED JAN. I, THANKSGIVING DAY, AND DEC. 25. TRANSFER STATIONS FOR USE OF COMMERCIAL AND MUNICIPAL VIEHICLES ONLY. 9 I o z 3 s { A I NGTpH CORPOR4r City f Huntington Beach CV Y o ng 9'y('►e� `FR teos.� ���Q P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ppUNTY CPS. September 27, 1967 TO COUNCIL HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Q 1957 Huntington Beach, California Attn: Mr. Doyle Miller TRASH COLLECTION Gentlemen: The trash collection committee met on September 27, 1967 and, after discussion, makes the following recommendations which, if you approve, should be passed by minute action: 1. Extend the present trash collection contract on a month-to-month basis. 2. Authorize the City Administrator to negotiate a new contract with the present contractor for residential purposes in cooperation with the committee. 3. Request City Attorney to amend existing need and necessity ordi- nance to provide for the inclusion of trash collectors . 4. Approve the concept of authorizing commercial pick-up, under the need and necessity provisions which would allow any approved trash collector to negotiate with commercial users for service subject to certain controls by the City. Respectfully submitted, AdKDB:mrl . DAL City Attorney • Residential Service This service shall be required for every single family dwelling on a scheduled, twice weekly basis. The standard unit of rubbish to be handled for the residential service charge shall not exceed an average, for each pickup, of a volume of two 55 gallon containers, of a weigh of 75 pounds per container. Residential service shall be limited to pickups made from public or private streets and alleys. Containers will be placed at the curb on streets on the day of pickup and returned to the premises on the same day. For alley pickup, containers will be located so that no entry onto private property need be made. Any other use or occupancy may apply for and may be granted residential service if they meet the residential criteria fully and are served by an individual water meter. Commerci.a►l Service All places, businesses and premises not meeting the criteria of residential service shall receive commercial service. Commercial service may be performed by any contractor possessing a Certificate of Need and Necessity granted by the City Council. Each contractor, prior to being granted a Certificate of Need and Neces- sity, shall submit, and have approved, a schedule of charges for the service he proposes to provide. Mah - General The fee for residential service shall be set by Resolution of the City Council. Disputes regarding any aspect of trash service shall be arbitrated by OFFICE MEMORANDtsM To Date From In Re "-"vs Z-- Q Ll-l\.)-96-`t �'. q OFFICE MEMORANDA. M To D. Miller Date 9-13-61 From Brander D. Castle In Re Garbage and Trash Contract Suggest we recommend t ouncil at the September 18 meeting, that present contract be extended for 90 da s to 1 9 8 During this time contract to be rewritten to provide equ-1 b e charges or commercial establishments; to to include an exact formula for monthly charges for multiple units; negotiate a rate for possible extension of Rainbow contract for another 3 to 5 years. Then submit to Council for decision as to accept extended contract of Rainbow or advertise for bid proposals. r BDC:bwo Brander D. Castle OFFICE MEMORANDUM To Doyle Miller Date September 18, 1967 From Brander Castle In Re A check of 49 cities shows only two cities contracting for refuse service at a rate less than $1. 40* for twice weekly pick-up. . .and almost all cities with city operated refuse service charges are higher than $1. 40 per month. *Seal Beach $1. 00 Westminster $1. 39 MEMORANDUM TO: James R. Wheeler, Director of Public Works FROM: Jay E. Ford, C. E. Assistant DATE: September 25, 1967 SUBJECT: Refuse Collection Survey The following is a breakdown of- the character of refuse collection' as handled by five cities relatively the size of Huntington Beach: ANAHEIM _ A. Residential 1.. Method Exclusive Contract . 2. Units Serviced 382000 3. Frequency Once weekly. 4. Type of Pickup Curb 5. Charges a. Amount $1.00 per month b. Billing City Utility Bill 6. Complaints No information 7. Rating a.. Citizens Good b. City Satisfactory B. Commercial 1. Method Exclusive Contract 2. ' ' Units Serviced 2 ,000 3. Frequency Optional 4. Type of Pickup Optional 5. Charges a. Amount Pickups Quantity Price 3 50 gal. or less $2. 50 6 50 gal. or less $4.00 other Cubic yard . $5.00 b. Billing By Contractor 6,, Complaints Unknown 'Fj Rating a. Citizens No information b. City Average Memorandum September 25, 1967 C. Comments 1. Residential and commercial contracts are separate. BUENA PARK A. Residential 1. Method Exclusive Contract 2. . Units serviced Unknown 3. Frequency Once weekly 4. Type of pickup Curb 5. Charges a. Amount $1.25 per month b. Billing Water bill 6.. Complaints Few 7. Rating a. Citizens Average b. City Average B. Commercial 1.. Method Exclusive Contract 2.. Units serviced Unknown 3. Frequency By Need 4.. Type of pickup Optional 5. Charges a. Amount No information b. Billing Water bill 6. Complaints Few 7. Ratings a.. Citizens Average b. City Average C. Comments 1. Residential and commercial are provided for under one contract. COSTA MESA A. Residential 1. Method Exclusive Contract 2. Units serviced 24, 800 '3. Frequency Once per week 4. Type of pickup Curb -2- Memorandum September 25, 1967 5. Charges a.. Amount . 87 per month b. Method Taxes statement 6.. Complaints All 1600-1966 7. Rating a, Citizens Fair b: City Satisfactory B. Commercial 1. ' Method Non exclusive contract 2. Number of Contractors Unlimited 3.. Frequency No information 4. Type of pickup No information 5. Charges No information 6. Complaints No information 7. Rating No information C. Comments 1. Definitions a. Residential- Households, apartments , small businesses, others. b. Commercial- Businesses which find city residential service unsatisfactory. 2. Residential and commercial contracts are separate. PASADENA A. Residential 1. Method City operated 2. Units serviced 34,000 3, Frequency Once weekly 4. Type of pickup Onsite 5. Charges a.. Amount $2 .00 per month b. Billing City utility bill 6. Complaints Few 7. Ratings a.. Citizens Good b. City No information B. Commercial 1. Method Non exclusive contract 2. Units serviced No information 3. Frequency By need -3- G Memorandum September '25, 1967 4. Type of pickup No information 5, Charges No in 6. Complaints Few 7. Ratings a. Citizens Good b. City No information C. Comments 1. City Commercial- Pasadena has approximately _100 commercial accounts , however., no infor- mation is available on these. SANTA ANA A. Residential L. Method Exclusive contract 2. Units serviced 35,000 3. Frequency Once weekly 4. Type of pickup Curb 5. Charges a. Amount $1', 70 bi monthly b. Billing Water meter 6. Complaints 50 per month . 7. Ratings a. Citizens Good b. City Good B. Commercial 1. Method Exclusive contract 2. Units serviced • 21000 3. Frequency By need 4. Type of pickup Optional 5. Charges Sliding scale a. Amo un t VOLUME IN NUMBER OF PICKUPS PER WEEK CUB'IC YARD _ . , .i _ 2 3 4 o r 5 6 . .00 8.75 2 3.50 6.00 8.50 14.00 17. 50 3 5_25 9.00 12.75 21.00 26.25 4 7.00 12.00 17.00 28.00 35. 00 b. Billing (1) Containers By city (2) Bins By contractor -4- Memorandum September 25, 1967 6. Complaints Price only 7. Rating a. Citizens Good b. City Good C. Comments 1. Residential and Commercial contracts are separate. The same breakdown for the City of Huntington Beach is as follows : HUNTINGTON BEACH A. Residential 1. Method Exclusive. contract 2.. Units serviced 24,000 3.. Frequency Twice weekly 4. Type of pickup Curb 5. Charges a.. . Amount .169 per $100 value b. Billing Taxes 6. Complaints Less than 1 per month 7. Rating a. Citizens Very good b. City Excellent B Commercial 1, Method Non exclusive contract 2. Units serviced Unknown 3.. Frequency. By need 4, Type of pickup Optional 5. Charges Sliding scale a.. . Amount Optional b. Billing Optional 6. Complaints Unknown 7. Rating a, Citizens Unknown b. City Excellent C. Comments 10 Regarding commercial accounts , the City of Huntington Beach operates under a need and necessity clause in its ordinance thus -5- Memorandum September 25, 1967 superseding the exclusiveness of existing collection agreement. 2. ' To further explain B-6, there have been no compplaint registered with the City during 1967 relative to poor commercial service. SUMMARY It should be noted there are common factors which exist in all o,f the cities examined. A. Residential 1. Exclusive control 2. Compulsory service 3. Curb service 4. Billing by city B. Commercial 1. Need and. necessity is the primary factor. Respectfully submitted, E. Ford C. E. Assistant JEF:ns -6- MEMORANDUM TO: James R. Wheeler, Director of Public Works FROM: Jay E. Ford, C. E. Assistant DATE: September 15, 1967 RE: Addendum to Refuse Collection Memorandum dated, September 11, 1967. There are several areas of ambiguity and inconsistancy in policies and interpretations of the existing refuse agreement. It should be noted that action on articles three (3), five (5), ten (10), and eighteen (18) should be effected to correct this situation. The following comments reflect these areas: C. ARTICLE 3 (Cont.) 2. Onsite'Collections It should further -be noted that the procedure for onsite refuse pick-ups is not in adherence to the intent of Article 3. Trailer parks appear to be the main area of concern .in this respect. The Contractor has been allowing his trucks to enter into the private alleys and drives in order to expedite collections. It has been acknowledged by both the City representative and the Contractor that this procedure is not in keeping with the intent of Article 3, however, lacking a better method, it has continued. It is also acknowledged that such a prac- tice does not merit the full compensation due to close proximity of trash containers. It was therefore deter- mined that a denominator of three would be more realistic, this is in effect at this time. Although this denominator is used in Trailer parks it is not applied to residential commercial developments or apartments where onsite collec- tion takes place. Full compensation is given here to each occupied unit. 3. Possible Solution The City of Buena Park has a section in its contract which reads; Contractor shall not be under obligation to enter private property to make collections within the City. However, in commercial and industrial areas where garbage, refuse combustible and non-combustible rubbish and other such materials are kept on a paved service yard or parking lot, it shall be collected from that place by contractor when deposited there by occupant. The exact location of depositing containers or bins in commercial and industrial areas may be determined by the City Administrator in the event a dispute arises between the Contractor and the occupant. Memorandum September 15, 1967 E. ARTICLE 5 (Cont.) 2. Inconsistance Although the intent of 1957 was adequate for 1957 it is not adequate in 1967. The inoperativeness of Article 5 exists in two main areas: a. Garbage and trash: These items are treated as homologous matter in Huntington Beach. b. Commercial Establishments: No differential is given here between grouped commercial e.g.: Neighborhood shopping centers; single commer- cials e.g.: Service stations, restaurants, etc.; and industrial. 3. Policy vs. Intent The policy has been from the inception to collect re- fuse in the old town commercial areas, once daily. However, this has not been extended to the greater Huntington Beach area. The origin of this policy began as a pacification to the old town merchants, and has continued in the atmosphere of a laissez-faire philosophy. It has been observed that the quantity of refuse generated by normal business oper- ations does not warrent daily collections. A frequency of twice weekly is adequate for the majority of commercial units. J. ARTICLE 10 (Cont.) 2. Clarification Article 10 must be replaced in the new agreement. First- ly, the character of a unit is not identified. Must it be occupied or merely exist? Does it have a minimum size or maximum size? It.is essential that both of these questions be answered. . An example of the confusion then can result from this unidentified unit can be formed at the Huntington Gardens Apartments. Upon opening the Huntington Gardens found it to their best interest to handle their refuse in the form of refuse bins rented from Rainbow Disposal. How- ever, unappreciated rental income forced Huntington Gardens to convert to privately owned containers. The City now be- came obligated under the agreement to make payment for these collections. Here the confusion began; on one hand the agreement calls an apartment a unit, but in this case it would take a multiple number of these small one room apart- ments to generate a similar quantity of trash equivalent to a single family house. -2- -a ,1 Memorandum September 15, 1967 ARTICLE 18 (Cont.) 2. Although Article 18 needs no changing as it is written, it does leave room for addition in order cover certain omissions within the agreement. Such additions might read: a. In the event of any uncertainty, conflict or am- biguity in the terms of this agreement or any or- dinances of the City regarding the collection and disposing of garbage, refuse, combustible and non combustible rubbish and other material within the City of Huntington Beach, the City Administrator shall have the right to make interpretation and such. interpretation of the City Administrator shall be final and the contractor shall abide thereby. b. The City Council shall have the right to enact ordinances or amendments to ordinances as may be necessary or required from time to time, dispite the provisions of this agreement and the power to enact such ordinances or amendments to ordinances shall not be limited by the provisions of this agreement. c. This agreement may be amended or modified from time to time upon the express written agreement of the parties hereto, and such amendment or mod- ification may increase or change the duties of the City or may increase or decrease the amount of compensation to be paid to the contractor. The above a, b, and c were taken from the refuse contract, City of Anaheim. by Jay E. Fbrd C. E. Assistant -3- MEMORANDUM TO: James R. .Wheeler, Director of Public Works FROM: Jay E. Ford - C. E. Assistant DATE: September 11, 1967 This memorandum is a specific review of certain sections of the refuse collection agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Rainbow Disposal Company, contractor for the City. The purpose is to examine specific section relative to their application to the current needs of the City of Huntington Beach. For the purpose of this evalu3tuon the articles of the agreement are assigned the same numbers as in the natural alignment of the agreement, each one of which is discussed in the context of its relative importance. I. EXISTING AGREEMENT and comments. In general the agreement is satisfactory. There are, however, several articles which should be given consideration in the new agreement. A.'. - Article 1. - That said agreements between the City and the Company dated April 11, 1961 and January 3, 1962 for the collection, removal and disposal of trash, rubbish and garbage are mutually concelled and termin- ated. 1. This article would require only changing of dates. B. Article 2. - That company is hereby given the right and privilege for a period of five (5) years commencing October 10, 1962 and ending October 9, 1967 of collecting, removing and disposing of trash, rubbish and garbage as defined in. Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, within the City of Huntington Beach, as the boundaries now exist, or may hereafter be altered, and the disposal of such refuse at any company dump or. transfer station dump unless otherwise provided for, 1. This article will require only changing of dates. C. Article 3. - That company shall cause to be collected, removed and disposed of, all garbage and trash from the cans and receptacles within the above defined area where trash and garbage has been placed, in accordance with Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, or as it may be amended. 1. The intent appears to have one of fixing the responsibility with the company to collect all refuse. However, Article 2, Article 6 and Article 7 of this agreement limit the size and makeup of refuse, with no provision for disposal of matter other than that described, eg: mattresses, couches, hot water tanks, etc. The frequency of the appearance of these items on public roads and at charity drop boxes would warrent consideration in Article 3. The company indi- cates willingness to locate large yardage drop boxes periodically at locations throughout the city, and to further provide a station- ary drop box at their yard to handle this situation. % 1 Memorandum Spptember 11, 1967 Page 2 D. Article 4. - Company shall at all times during the term of this agreement keep and maintain in good operating order, sufficient trucks and other equipment to properly and adequately service the area covered by this agreement. 1. No changes required. E. Article 5. - Company shall maintain mimimum schedules for collection as follows: Residential and non-commercial: Garbage - Two times per week Trash - Two times per week Commercial Establishments: Garbage - Daily, excluding Sunday Trash - Daily, excluding Sunday 1. Article 5 is adequately written for its intent. F. Article 6. - That as referred to herein, in addition to the descrip- tion of rubbish and trash, as set forth in Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, "trash", for the purpose of this agreement is de- fined as wasterpaper, cans, bottles, glass, metal, grass,' trimmings of all':- kinds and all types of debris generally referred to as "trash and rubbish". For the purpose of this agreement, trash will not need to be tied in bund- les and the use of 55 gallon oil drums as receptacles for trash will be permitted. 1. No changes required. G. Article 7. - That the word, "garbage", as used, and whenever used in this agreement, shall mean and be construed to mean, all vegetable and animal refuse which may be placed in cans or receptacles placed in or along the sides of any public alley in the City of Huntington Beach, or at any other convenient place provided therefor, or as may be designated by the Health Department of the City of Huntington Beach. In the event that any public alley shall be impassable due to any reason whatsoever and such garbage cans are placed in parkways adjacent to the streets fronting on said property, that during such times as said alleys may be impassable, the collection of said garbage shall be made from said parkways by Company. 1. No changes required. H. Article 8. - That all work done hereunder by the Company shall be done in such method and manner so as to conform with the provisions of Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code as the same now provides, or may be amended to provide,- and Company further agrees that in the disposal and handling of such trash and garbage, they will comply with all City and County ordinances and State regulations pertaining thereto. 1. No change required. Memorandum September 11, 1967 Page 3 I. Article 9. - Company agrees that upon removing garbage from recept- acles it will replace said receptacles and replace the covers therewith; that it will not allow or cause any garbage to spill, while handling the same, upon any public .street or private property and will use proper care in handling of said receptacles so as not to destroy or damage the same more than is reasonably necessary under proper handling of the same. 1. No change required. J. Article 10. - City shall pay to the Company for services rendered, under the terms of this Agreement, each calendar month, as follows: First 1,100 units - $1.60 per unit per month Next 400 units - 1.55 per unit per month Next 500 units - 1.50 per unit per month Next 500 units - 1.45 per unit per month All over 2,500 units - 1.40 per unit per month For the purpose of this agreement, one unit shall be considered as a single house, apartment or a small business establishment, as provided in Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, or as it may be amended. 1. This breakdown is superfluous, as only the current price applies. K. Article 11. - The company, or any partner, shall not sell, assign, or transfer this Agreement, or any interest therein, without first obtaining the consent of the Huntington Beach City Council. Until the adoption of any ordinance by the City Council, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of garbage and salvage materials after the same has been collected. L. Article 12. - Company shall, at all times, during the life of this Agreement, keep on file with the City of Huntington Beach, a bond in the sum of $20,000.00 to the effect that Company will -faithfully perform its contract and comply with all of the ordinances of the City relating to the care, control, collection and disposal of garbage, refuse, filth and trash. 1. . No change required. M. Article 13. - Company agrees that for the purpose of transporting any garbage under this contract, it will provide, maintain and use at all times Mentioned herein, trucks suitable in size, which trucks shall be equipped with a metal body and be provided with a cover which shall sufficiently and amply cover the contents of said trucks, and said covers shall be so arranged at all times while said trucks are upon the public highways, alleys or any. public places, so as to cover any filled portion of said trucks and shall be so arranged and kept that during actual collections of garbage there shall be a sufficient opening for placing said garbage in said trucks, but that no more of the -garbage in said trucks shall be uncovered than shall be nec- essary for. such purpose, and at any time while transporting garbage upon the public streets while not actually collecting garbage from receptacles, the entire- contents of said trucks shall be covered. 1. No change required. Memorandum September 11, 1967 Page 4. N. Article 14. - Company shall report monthly the number of units in each area served by Company during the month and the amount paid to Company shall be based upon the number of units in the area served by Company. City re- serves the right to make actual counts from time to time, of the units served by Company and Company agrees to co-operate with the authorized personnal of City in counting the units. 1. No change required. 0. Article 15. - Company shall, at all times during the term of this Agreement, abide by all rules, regulations and statutes of the,State of California respecting the employment of labor under this. contract, and shall keep in full force and effect adequate Workmens' Compensation on its employees. 1. No change required. ' P. Article 16. - Company shall keep in full force and effect,IOuring the life of this agreement, a policy of public liability and property damage insurance, in such amounts as shall be deemed satisfactory to the City Council, and in which policy the City shall be named as an additional assured and Company shall furnish City written evidence of said policy or policies. 1. No change required. Q. Article 17. - City reserves the right to cancel this agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Company in the event that Company shall be in default in any of the terms, covenants and conditions as set forth in this Agreement, or in the event that Company 'shall fail to comply and abide by all of the. requirements and provisions of Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, as the same now exists, or may hereafter be amended. Upon such default, the City shall have the exclusive right to rent and operate any or all trucks, trailers, tractors, bulldozers and other equipment used by the Company in the performance of the work specified in this Agreement. Such rental shall be upon a reasonable basis until other arrangements can be made by the City and the rental of garbage or refuse trucks shall be at the rate of $25.00 per day. Any moneys due the Company for rental may be withheld by the City and used for the purpose of Paying any payments due or outstanding liens unpaid said equipment. 1. No change required. R. Article 18. - This contract is and shall be subject to all Federal, State, County and Municipal laws and particularly Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code as it now reads, or may be amended. Any discrepancy between the laws mentioned above and this contract shall render the contract void only as to said discrepancy and shall not vitiate the entire contract. 1. No change required. Memorandum September 11, 1967 Page 5. II. SUMMARY: All articles of the Agreement have been included in their entirty to main':' tain continuity. Although there are possible changes which could be made in the Ordinances relative to refuse collection, the Agreement need not incorporate them. i Hy—,1h 2.6379 i San C,[emenfe Commercial Co. MUNICIPAL REFUSE CONTRACTOR P. O. Box 199 RANDOLPH ODNE San Clemente, California To; 0 Date: From: Betty Oswald OFFICE MEMORANDUM To Date From In Re P� � o 3 � �i� 5T' � . _-_�. � � � / I C � G��' 1 I � �� -- � - //� i Garden Grove - ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO., INC. 13902 WEST ST. • P.O. BOX 188 • JE.1-8716 GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA Date To Subject 04 Signed �- �,2! ac�DCO-1® 1 -- TRIP- x a TO DATE rq p' tt F ka i 4 g. PLEASE REPLY TO SIGNED /or �3 =DATE SIGNED Redif?rm SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. 4S 465 t . �— UNIVERSAL BY- PRODUCTS, INC. I Mailing Address: P. O. BOX 416 9200 GLENOAKS BOULEVARD SUN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91352 (213) 767-7153 875-0340 September 22, 1.967 City Manager City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: Several business associates and friends have sent me the copy of the Huntington Beach Independent Review Newspaper referring to the extension of your present refuse collection contract. As one of the largest refuse collection firms in Southern California, we have a great interest in this matter. Our firm, in business for 15 years, is publicly owned with its stock being traded over-the-counter. Our wholly owned refuse collec- tion subsidiary, Universal Refuse Removal Co. , provides residential and commercial collection throughout greater Los Angeles. Additionally, we have subsidiaries and affiliates operating in other parts of this State and Arizona. An interesting aspect of our operation and one I am sure is unique to us is that our Financial Statements are not only Certified with an unqualified opinion but also a matter of public know- ledge. We also have a wholly owned subsidiary which has the Franchise Diamond Reo Dealership in Los Angeles and maintains an inventory of new refuse collection vehicles completely serviced and ready for operation on 24 hour notice. This inventory in itself would be suffi- cient to service your City. If there should be any interest in the City in proposals for refuse City Manager, City of Huntington Beach (Continued) September 22, 1967 -Page two- collection, we would be most interested in submitting a comprehensive program. If any of the foregoing is of interest to you, we would appre- ciate hearing from you. Ver tr our i Richard P. Stevens President ss 1727 ARTESIA BOULEVARD ■ MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIF 90266 ■ Phones: or 379-9962 i7g-494-g September 1., 1967 City of Huntington Beach City Hall Huntington Beachp California Attention; Donald D. Shipley Vice Mayor Gentlemenl; please place o'leary Disposal on your list for bidding purposes or for notification of mom id contracts to be let. Feel free to inspect our equipwnt or our financial standing at any tilae. We will be happy to talk with you at your convience to discuss any detail or specific information concerning services we may be abls to pride. Thank you for your consideration. sincerely O'IEAIM DISPOSAL CORPORATION John W. O'Leary President JWO/b z ZPAjr�i. 2)400dL eyL�s07�t" y WASHINGTON cc` 1727 Artesia Boulevard. - `*anhattan. Beach., California City of H=UM9ton Beach City Hall Huntington Beach., California Attention; Doaa,ald D. Shipley Vice Mayor 1 I "MIX ' e ' ' 1� Oh ' • I ` ' • _MW .. ...... ------ Allw I, �• MW u 1 , ��- e (cm, PA +* ` ' " I •' ., - ... �.- . , .. , , . --. ,- - .k �. -I-N. ,- - � ­' ,-, -:7,-1,,"',-v .1 .. . -�.. f .4 I . . ,, - - - -, .,,..-l$,.,� �.:V,�,­!,- �, -, ,.'-. .- ,' " ,�. _� -, " ", , ". f , "C"..'. � �%_�. .1_1 .. , .... , - . - -,- -, . 1. ­--%,;­.. �­ �1,�. � .'.,:-:,. ,.,' - , . "* . ."-`.I%- ­­-'.-.� -.- ,p..-, - '. I �".'!'4 - -..,..,,.,( t�I.V,- ("4,I--._t S�I ­i,,�-t - ." I_ " -..,.�;,I. .-�",."�.,-. 0.--,..,,..- - t" } % y a " � l - qV � .­i . r, ;4 �_X� 1.9January 9 .- . l"i t-" � ­� �"�l , ­ e�-� 1,7702 I'ii .g tv6' � l b V~ fi ? � �Jq1­A , Hun Lng b . -athvtGal .', ... - .,, ' vt .- ..,-. ,. .­ -� " N "k ; J I..�_)l.I41 T L,"-;�_­1�"­-. -e,..,... ;­­�7-' A. -l",�,. -'. "'V' ,­ �.-., .."-.,.­ t.' .., ......t.' .,. , <" _i ­ ....l".- V �.._. Y.­_'. -.�.�, .,. ,,.­ - ,, ­' L-� .- I. " .? ftinti gto 3e6ch ,-Clt , C6unc1I. �­ .1,. ..z �.%r ' , �!� � , :­ ,�',..,.-,,I;� " .!-... I.,".. ,­.. �. ­­ " � :t - ..:,l.. ) , -4 j �r 1- Wave Iit ITitimb6a 6iding the article axi-'lA e V4 Ti ot T 'ar­ "Ming �.. ­ .,-. ... 1, '.. ' ...... ..­�­ -: .W'.�- � ­ .,"..,..:..," -1 , ' ­ ...,. .... -, ..�­ ,,:- $ " tV' a :the- ,i dbt' 66' �+o�" he fee on trashrp ,T' service. ,j i e _i , f 4 �­ :�. _A c _ , v qn` nb,L up&erst= why 'so many . ; obj ec iug th �I , .1I�i have;; 3 lived i 6thgr 6iit i&i,MnA 1.pa.d fdf. e , . h �Wqp�very,dnXexro ( 6.` . 'i"l r• we­hiV h Y, ift Huntington:~Beach: - K &r e m -g1 a ,fb pays fiIS v .:,.l-. -1 :­ .. .-"-..�,. �.._.- _ : , ,_. ; ..'." ,., .1 �,..,.i.,.'.'. � ,`-"- .,. i : �. .A _, � .kv,�_:,� i � :. f � ji. ­t - . _ ' , 1 " "%I ,"r1 t ,..m ., II. -. �.- ­ ;- .,, :. , ., � - ,-* " � SmalI;lsi o,k _pwu fine service: -*I- 1WiI help lt 1h,gt,0i� 6 dh, ,N q_. l " � l t ' 4 A�-�­I ; l. :— � I,- f , zY -, ­. �om6,a_more,?,mbaen C 1AyAhbft thin_ % ee: iA: 'AO, dbub ,the-tr­686, " i, a ,. - -. .,.A; , ' ' - I ; S 1.I f, v t "/­ iA ,i MV -tb",rai- i revenue mlthMi h t XV 6� erleps­the 8 d AJJzens F ­ % r 1_, t , *- �4 �, z , ' 4 who .object ui,'&�-1 ike c o .find th6,mf�V ,Whi,mA4 0 A "pcsin9" flz their -_ k f ,`- , —, i ' " k­ i­ -I ( ;, IANlj % —' 1 "I ­ '1 � _, IN% ii9 P- I ml-sur they: fi6.t"be. le -t A 8.O legally for,` $10jFq ,Y J ,,at,m ontb`i.. , ­ '�. ���­ �, - ­," - � ,­ 1 I�. ," ,'- l A 61- 1 _S , .., that Jr_t h t You & at�, t e`�rr ahV�thJtr.g " —I— . -ture most ��, l t . � %� ' A , . 1k .A,1 % ;_ , ` ,, , � i 1 . " ,TFT NKT%NG%"peo I e j�I -agree *jth4,fte* A , �� "k . � , y_ , e j ­� ­,* , % 1 , i V - i ­ ' "1, �w,,V j• `x­ V­*TV . ­ , 1 � z _ L l t" � •.'t I , ,!t� "; � A-, ) '0 1 ,­­ ; "C Zt,� �% �. ., nc.er A yours; 1'"� p 1i '';"O�,l t, , _ (-j— W ' ,, ", _ ,--.--r ��- . - - 2_4- t . John R4y 't; "" ",i ­,Ni lv , " .5I-j m �kf-I � " 1- _n _I _5; "� A 1, �; i - N ,-A I,. ­%!; 1 �"1�, 1" ­; �, K, i Vi" ",�C ;1 rF ,% ­ � X � - f j ; 1 -C?�3 1 -1 ,­ " .." a .0 A,�-Ts . k-hL'N�' � - , ,-�k ;t , .) ­�-. k { , .< t - 4- 1 - ")?I v 'v� eX - S. " , 7.,� r tQs�"" S O ,, f , , ' , 4 ­% ­ e � W ,Frl -,k - i }.k ' t'4 V"� X� ; 'IiJc � -1: - 1t -­ -,�I ­',­N t ,� J. L , t t, k _ vv -K , :,4 i, , ,Z , .,., ;I ,1-­� A. �l $ '`1 ;' VI "'7 1' , ( ,� ,X-4 q j ,;- � ,k 1 l N , v , F�. "AI, K; . "t ' .I_ 1­ ,F " r 1 lt 4"i -) .I "- _ ,% Y­-t - _,% I k �Y��;" V: � ' ; 1 � .-.­l." ; ,,, __ i4 a` x , t. i- I t-� I k .f Jr +" , + c , ,A ; xu S 5` 'r C} t- O NY 1; .S j , O 7 � F-.i _, " \.j" t "4j-v- F X . i 4-, I� VN 71 f _ 5 ,ly­ l v ­ .fI " " l •t ! r­ rV ­ l) ,,­va, 5 A5 6 ' l , � A, " t ; .K -A 1 ' � , tIi ?; , e., - ­ j c l U ', ,;. , .}e� A . ,� I )""" ' 1-"li_"'e-4e, A,�%, 1 , L , , v, i, I iy -P \i,t jW , 4 gO --a t". 4, ,,Z­ j " �� �, � 4�­ , ,, 5, k` "P,,N , , ,I f`-f � ., r" � 4 .I , , , ," ,4 01 ; 4 j ," I- , .i" , ' v1.J yN -.j �- J _t 1 -, ­v, 2, " b �'- ,, :'_i _A ' t i j ­ , ­ .� , , A - % i- I V ( A. �' l , _ ,�, .j). V ,� 5'J , , 'Z "j" y , I­ �z t 1, ` ­ Xv,� �j ,_y, t � Y , 'I , " TWjw t t j. i. � A ; J ,% j,5R:', , 1 r ­ , v q I I " - `­ q_­ , , lW� �I , , . K 1 : t- r . - , - k ,� 4 , _e.. . 5 '- - .-. - , .. 1 ' .­­ ., , F _,. 'tick- A-­-c".­� l_.­.-.., v, ['P�I/.,.--�,.-& __�:j..:'"-.,�,�-"'g.% �.,-1_..4-,�',�l�.:',_"I.1,.-,- � -_`_,,.f 1-," " O m�­ L k`l"l­ & ll"," ,0 ,% " � , d ___ t :t- .-. " , - , , , �I f_ ,, S o 4, .�: *., ,,LL _,. ,,� , � , , � j . i 1 ­ W tI S I�� . P ;:t " e . � ;­tA"A7. L"'Ii�vl . vI � ..- -, :.� � , ._.. ., ,N. , .. .. .. ORDINANCE NO. 1365 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REPEALING CHAPTER 32 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE, RELATING TO REFUSE DISPOSAL, AND ADOPTING CHAPTER 32 ENTITLED "REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL. " The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. That Chapter 32 of all articles and sections thereof are hereby repealed. Section 2. That the following Chapter, Articles and Sections of Chapter 32 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are hereby added and as added shall read in words and figures as follows„ CHAPTER 32 REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL ARTICLE 321. - GENERAL 322. - DEFINITIONS 323. - COLLECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS 324. - REFUSE COLLECTION 325 - FEES 326 - CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY ARTICLE 321 GENERAL S. 3210 Owner to keep premises clear of garbage and other offensive substances. S. 3210. 1 Every owner, tenant, occupant or person owning or having care of any premise shall keep said premise in a clean and sanitary condition, and no person shall permit any sewer effluent, excrement, slop or stagnant water, butcher offal, market refuse, garbage, dead animal, rubbish, cans, wastepaper, filth of any kind or any other substance that may become offensive, to be deposited or remain in or upon any premise owned or occupied by him or under his control except as otherwise provided by law. ARTICLE 32? DEFINITIONS Or:•firdtions. 1:'or the :)ur )oses of this cha;)ter, the lio .owii evords and %)hrases shall have the niea►)ings herein- after set forth. Any word or phrase used in this chapter which is not hereinafter sxcificaily defined shall have the meaning commonly attached to such word or )hrase in ordinary usage. S. 322U. I Refuse. Refuse shall mean and include all garbage, animal oa-vegetable, or household waste. all combustible or in- combustive trash or waste which ordinarily is created or accumulated in the o -e-ration and n;aintenatice of a household, business or industry, including leaves, cuttings, trinrimings from trees, shrugs, grass, and filth of any kind. Refuse does not include heavy or balky articles such as trees, tree limbs, logs, autontobile )odics, large motor vehicle carts, building materials, a a andoned a:)oliances or household goods or business fixtures, grass froai renovating, sod, dirt, or similar material, or any other suhsta►zce. or material that is, or may become offensive. S. 3220. 2 Basic Level of service. That t level of collection and disr)osal sere ce necessary to collect the refuse generated by an average fancily iii oae single fancily residence as specifically provided in any given contract liet;aeen the city and any Jerson for collection of sucia refuse, or by resolution of the City Council. S. :3220.3 Collection. 1 he collecting, gathering together, and trans- '56 ping ofrefuse, for-dis:)osaI it) accordance with the rules and regulations ;)ertaining to the o�x-ration of ®range County dumr,) rites and transfer stations. S. 3220. 4 Refuse Container. Any container, can, rece)tacie, vessel, tanR or box designed for or used for holding or containing refuse. S. :322U. 5 Sin.rie Fancily l csidence. Shall mean and include every cat in t e ity uJon WHIch is situated one dwelling unit designed for or used as living quarters by human beings. It shall not include lots with hotels, nm®tels, lodge halls, clubs, tourist eam.)s, trailer came )s, churches, business and industrial establishments, or any lot containing more than o►ae dwelling unit or urn which any commercial or industrial occur)ation is being conducted unless such occupation is be hig conducted in a single family residence. S. 3220.6 Person. Any individual, person, firm, corl,-*ration, artnershi,), co-)artnershi), joint venture, or other organization. 2. ARTICLE :32 3 CO1,LECTION VEHICLE AND REFUSE CONTAINERS S Refuse Containers required. It shall be Vic fluty of every owner, lessee, manager, and;or person in possession, charge or control of a )uildinb on any _)remises in the vity to 'proffide or cause to be provided, and at all times to kee:) or cause: to be kei)t, sufficient and convenient portable refuse containers union said -'remises. S 3231 Dum-1-3in of Refuse. No -X-rson shall deposit or cause or ;x rn:at too Be s�tesd, any refuse upon or inany :��ablic street, alley or other *iublic Mace, or u;�on any .:)retriises in this City, except in refuse containers as ;provided in this c la;-)ter. S.S.® T -?e and Size of Containers. Each refuse container shall be of soun;3 c:onstructlodz ands all be water tight. Containers may only ac used for containing anin-lal or vegetable waste resulting; from the preparation of food if they have a tight fitting cover. Containers for single family residences shall not weigh more than sixty hounds when filled with refuse. s�33 Coveria.* Containersi. The cover shall not be removed from t gose containers reMuiring covers exce st when necessary to place refuse therein or to ren-,ove refuse therefrom; at all other times said Lover shall be in glace oil said container. S�3234 Location of Container. Each refuse container shall be kept or p ac;e in such a manner as not to he visible from the ;zunlic street and so as to be easily accessible to the refuse collector, provided that during or for the time fixed for the collection of refuse from said containers, such containers shall I3e kept or :laced as follows: S. 3�234. 1 Fear Alley. Where there is an alley other than a blind aaTtey ate tfie rear of such premises, such refuse container shall be (laced on the )rcmises, within five feet (5) of the rear proDerty line. SS 34 2 Access from Side Entrance. "Where there is no alley oI r tl an a Mind arfe—y lffi tCie rear of such premises and there is a side entrance to the rear of such premises, each such refuse container shall be placed on the premises at an accessible point adjacent to said side entrance. S. 3234.3 On Curb. Where there is no alley other than a Mind alley p 'In the rear of the premsises nor such side entrance, each such refuse container shall be placed on the curb in front of the premises. 3. S. 321`05 Refuse Container in public Way. No person shall -Place: re se coant '`�a nn er an any street, alley, sidewalk, court, or other ;public; way in the City at any time other than the regular tine Or collection of refuse; every ;person who so places a refuse container for the purpose of refuse collection shall renjove same no later than 7 P.M. or two hours after the container is enn stied, whichever is later•. S. 3236 Interference with Refuse Container. It is unlawful for any ;person, other Uian Me owns r of a refuse container or any officer, agent or en:,ployee of said owner, of the City, or of the :person holding; a contract for collection of refuse from such container, to inter- fere in any manner with any such container or to remove such container from the location where same shall have been :placed .by the owner thereof, or by said owner's agent. S. 37 lran ro per Substances in Container. No ierson shall ;,lace or cause or i'vern tt to pact; sn any refuse container, any substance or material. other than refuse as defined in this chapter. S. 3738 Moving or Conveying Refuse in City_. No ivxson shalt remove or convey or cau6e or peri-rat to w removed or conveyed, any refuse on or along any public street, alley, or other tm!.)lic place in the City except a nersoan legally operating a refuse collection service In the City as ;provided in this charmer. S. 32:39 Vehicle for Collection All vehicles used in collecting; and trap portnang ke uses Ball be _?rovided with metal ladies and shall be so constructed as to be water tight and, to -prevent the loss of any contents being collected or transported therein upon the streets, alleys, and other .public ways in the City. Such vehicle shalt be thoroughly cleansed daily so as to reduce or etirninate odors and decayed or rotten materials. ARTICLE 324 REFUSE COLLECTION S City Contract for Collection._ The City may enter into a contract with some responsible ,person to provide a 'Msic level of service for the collection of refuse in the City at the times and in the manner prescribed in said contract, which contract shall gun for a ;period of not more than five (S) years. The contract shall be accompanied by a bond in the total annount of the contract for the ;preceding; year (which bond shall be reviewed and undated -prior to July 1 of every year) to guarantee faithful performiannce of said contract and compliance with all the regulation of this City, the county, and state, relating to the collection, care and disposal of refuse. The City may, in awarding such contract for collection of refuse, advertise for bids. S 3241 Collection by City. The City or its authorized agent shall operatemaintain a service for thre collection of refuse from single fan-jily residences on a regular, scheduled laisis approved by the City Council, provided collection shall be made at least once a week. 4. r Refuse generated and accumulated at single family residences shall +� collected exc lusively by the City, its duly authorized agents or err:pi;-)gees, or by a contractor with whom the City may have entered into a contra.t for such service, ;provided that the owner or occupant of such residences may contract with the City, or its contractor, or an other person legally operatin.ga refuse service in the City for the collection and removal of all materials and substances not included in this cha:3ter as refuse and all refuse in excess of that amount of refuse collected in the basic level of service. S. Collection - Non Single Family. Multi-family residential, commerc a an n ustr a un_Ws may have their refuse collected in the same manner and for the same rate as a single family residence provided the refuse generated by such unit :foes not exceed the basic level of service as defined in this chapter. 'Thf.% owner or ;arson in control of any such unit generating refuse in excess of the basic level of service shall contract with the City or with any -x-rson legally otxerating a refuse collection service in the City for the collection of refuse in excess of the basic level of service. S. 3242. 1. Upon notification of the Director of Finance uion forms supplied by said Director, the owner, or ;Mrson in control of any multi-family residential, commercial or industrial unit which is contracting for refuse service shall not be liable for the charge for the basic level of service ,provided for in this chanter. ARTICLE 325 FEES Liability of occupants for fees; billing landlord. S, 3)250. 1 The City Council finds that the ,periodic collection of refuse ® from all places and premises in the City benefits all occupants of Maces and premises In the City and, therefore, all occupants receiving the benefit of the basic level of refuse service are made liable for refuse collection fees %)rescribed by this article. S. 3250. 2 The case of premises in which the occupant does not receive the billing for refuse collection but the landlord does, such landlord shall collect such fees levied against the occupant of the dwelling unit or -)lace or alaces of business located on such premises, and shall transmit the amount to )e collected to the City. S. 3250.3 In the event the landlord fails to collect such fees from any such occupant and remit the same to the City, the landlord shall be liable to the city for ixiyment of such fees. S®32511 RJuse Collection-Charges. The charge for the basic level o sery ceps ereny esta fished as $1. 50 per month. 5. S. 3252 Fee. Debt. ,S. .3252. 1 A :fee or charge unposed by this Chapter shall be a civil debt owing the city from the occur-Ant of the property to which the basic level of service is made available whether such '-;rvice is used or not. S. 3252. 2 Discontinuation of refuse service by forms and procedure;.,, prescribed by the Director of Finance due to vacancy or pursuant to Sections 3242. 1 shall not excuse payment of all sums that have accrued under this article prior to such discontinuation. S Payment and ffilltng. The charges provided for in this c ap tes z r a1 ll_ m pined with the charges presently Included In the water billing and hereafter shall be called the Utility Billing of the City of Huntington Beach. Whether the water charges alone, or the water and refuse charges tog ther, or the refuse charge alone constitute the total of said utility bil. Said Utility Bill shall be for the saare period as the present water bill and shall be payable in the same manner. Failure to pay the full utility gill shall result In discontinuation of all services included in such bill. S. 3254 Accounting System. S.S. 3 The Finance Department as collection agency for the City shall institute and maintainn a system of accounting adec!uante and sufficient to provide corrinlete records of refuse operations for which charges are imimsed by this chapter. ARTICLE 326 CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY S. 3260 Certificate of public Deed and NecessItX Required. It shall be an` ere y declared to rut for any person to operadte or conduct any refuse disposal service in the City unless such person { has previously obtained a Certificate of Public Need and Necessity to do so, as provided in this article. S. 3261 Application for Certificate. Any ;arson desiring to obtain erti:irate ® ua a `d and Necessity, required by this article, shall nrnaker applications therefor to the City Council by filing the same with the City Clerk. Each application shall be accompank-d by a performance bond in the amount of Ten Thousand ($tO,000) Dollars, as well as a fee of Twenty-l+ive ($25) Dollars for the processor the: applice�Ion. Said bond shall in the f®�°en ree!eaired by the ffunt&iton Beach Ordinance Code for other performance bonds. Said application shall be in writing and shall set forth the following Informations: (a) Name, age, business and residence address and telephone numbers of the applicant, if a natural ;arson, or if a corporation, Its name, date and place of incorporation, address and telephone nunn,%er of its place of business and the names and addresses of its principal officers; or if a partnership, association or unincorporated company, the names atnd., business and resilience addresses and telephone numbers of the partners of- the persons comprising such association or company. 6. N) An accurate map af the district, territory or arva propmed to be aer� iced by tt applicant. (c) A description of ttm methods of operation. (d) A statement in detail as to the public wed and . necessity for additicnal refuse service in the City of Huntington leacb. (e) A statement as to what offenses including moving traffic violations, if cany, any person (a) mentioned in sub-section (a) hereof, have beery co;-victed,. (If his includes a plea of guilty.) (Lj A description of the type of refuse service to be fL,arnislred. A description of the Vehicles, including color, make, size, license number, and special refuse collection egtApment, to b. e used. (h) One set of three standard ei.ze fingerprint cards beartag the finglerp�rints of each person mentioned in sub-section (a) hereof.. (1) One recent identification photograph of each of the persons in sub-section (a) hereof. (j) Stich other information as may 1e required by the City Cou7ncl s or the Chief of Police. S.32962 ?rocessin � Application for Certificate. Upon receipt �a en 'lam � r r -- Ides and l�a�cessity the City clerk: shall immediately forward a copy of the application to icht alief of Police who shall iniesti to the character, fitness and qualLfieations of ever, person whose name appears on such application.. Upon completion of said Investi tion, dw Chief of Police shall transmit such applicaton to the city administrator, to tit' with his recommendations that thie Certificate he granter, denied or modified, together with his reasons therefor after st-udy, the City Administrator whall thereupon trana;;±s�ft such applicationa to ttw City Council, together with his recommendatl.orw upon such application. _ S. 3263 City Council Action. Upon receipt of an application fora C-e c e"'o u c Need and Necessity, and the recamrnends- tions of the Chief of Police and the City Administrator, the City Covincil, attter consideration, may deny the application, grant the same, or modify, the same, as the Council ems aftecessary for the protection of the public 1,�ealth, safety, welfare, pease, and morals of the citizens of this city. S. Notice to Applicant _ Aral. The City Clerk, in wri•in sn y e app can o Me Council's decision. With as lien days aftei the mailin of such notification, the applicant may demaead, in writing, a public heartno.. If he des not do so, he shall be:.ideemed to have consented or agreed to such denial, granting or modification of dut application. 7. Cr td':;'Z i_..cai a���`2» iJ U-�•'. C � .2k.�.i }:;a.8e Re pVso''`�&- 4F, '1244; chn"otex, ci.zy czin 't. ahall hold C- Teeat one ;public hearing Uiia'ay daya aft a yh demand ;is fYlo".. he city clerk shell Serve t"11, Mai'.l oar rvioustered or certified mails, of the tirre, and lilac; of .1l hearing, n:aE less :tin ten days �+rlor to the date set or �abitc herwring, Upar. the City Administrator, Chief of Police, the applicant, and any per•srAl des", �:�.imgd on dhe application to receive notice of the city council actioin ortl e {ublic !,wring. The nailing of such notice, with postage Itrepaid, Wdr.es!: r :fie applicant or to such other persons here.inabove designnatcd, at t.:e sped_ addresses speci&ied in the application or demand for heal inn- shall "0-—tute sufficient notice of such hearing. Nothing herein shall'. x,: .eons .rued as lien iting the power of the city council to grant a Gee lfi:ate of ':=ublic Need and Necessity to more than one refuse callectior SN"Ir •ic.: to op-r- _ate in the same area of the cite. z126': FUainess License Re aired. Every person, owning, operannI. nduc €remise FoU�ction disposal service in this city sha Il, , adds ion ro and after obtaining the foregoing Certificate al Public a.Neol f d Ne eFslty, obtain a business license &refor and shall ipay to the ,Sit..;- the butzi Less license fee provick-d for by the Huntington &n,4ch k�:i in 9C e `ice. kx.I.e., 1`40 such business liceruse isamd by the city to ii-my pe-rtlx, tirior to the time such person is granted a Certificate of [.-Iblic Nee(; ar.d Nec-saity by the City Council shall be valid. Section 3. The City Clerk shalt certify to the passage and actor Ir,)A of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be publishes by one 3.nae:'U.,U n is tr.ie Huntington Bch News, a weekly newspaper printed, irub`Uiih, d and. c;;rcpaslated in ft City of Hunti t Bch, C.a.lifo"% Lt. '-'A-&-'STD AND ADOPMD by this City Council of the City of Huntin tan & :.1ch, California, on ft 4th da.y of December 1967. Donald D. Shipley . mayor �.,..�.�. Paul C . Jones �.. 0 wes S:ity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: K. Dale Bush City Attorney • 1365 • Ord. NO. 1 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss : - 3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) . 4 I , PAUL C. JONES, The duly elected, qualified, and 5 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach .and ex- 6 officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby 7 certify that the whole number of members of the City Council 8 of the City of Huntington. Beach is seven; that the foregoing 9 ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular adjourne 10 meeting thereof held on the 27th day of November 11 19 67 , and was again read to said City. Council at a regular 12 meeting thereof held on the 4th day of December , 13 1967 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of 14 more than a majority of all the members of said City Council. 15 16 AYES: Councilmen.: 17 Coen, Bartlett, Gisler, Kaufman, Stewart, Green, Sh pley 18 NOES: Councilmen: 19 None 20 ABSENT: Councilmen: 21 None 22 23 Paul C . Jones 24 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City 25 of Huntington Beach, California 26 27 28 29 30 �TINGT 1[ City of Huntington Beach ��� `4 it �ea•� ���@ P.O. Box 900 CALIFORNIA 92649 F�UUN La` September 27, 1967 APPBOYED gy CITY COLN�t... • HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL -"'1' 19....... Huntington Beach, California .—.r Attn: Mr. Doyle Miller CITY CLERK TRASH COLLECTION Gentlemen: The trash collection committee met on September 27, 1967 and, after discussion, makes the following recommendations which, if you approve, should be passed by minute action! 41. Extend the present trash collection contract on a month-to-month basis. 42. Authorize the City Administrator to negotiate a new contract with the present contractor for residential purposes in cooperation with the committee. 43. Request City Attorney to amend existing need and necessity ordi- nance to provide for the inclusion of trash collectors. . Approve the concept of authorizing commercial pick-up, under the need and necessity provisions which would allow any approved trash collector to negotiate with commercial users for service subject to certain controls by the City* Respectfully submitted, KDB:mrl t. 4DAIJ�& City Attorney � �13 ELNEiR'S DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC. P.O. BOX 5 , EL CAJON, CALIF. 92022 �✓'" 7 . September 7, 1967 City Clerk Huntington Beach, Calif. Dear Sir or Madam: This company is at this time serving the City of El Cajon as the franchised operator for refuse removal. In connection with a study in which I am cur- rently engaged, I will appreciate your sending me a copy of your City Ordinance governing hauling of trash by private contractors and, for development of comparative figures on rates 'and other pertinent infomation, a copy of the existing franchise(s). When my study is completed, a report will be furnished to the City Clerk and City Manager of El Cajon and, if you so desire, I will be glad to forward a copy to you. The success of my effort is, of course, dependent on response from the sixteen Southern California cities which I am contacting. Your help will be appreciated. If there is a charge involved, I will be glad to forward my check. Respectfully yours, R. M, Wiesendanger President 67r 1/ 3 512 EAST VERMONT STREET 'F ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 KE 5 - 0203 August 1, 1967 i Doyle Miller City Administrator City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Re: Proposed Trash Transfer Tax Dear Mr. Miller: Our -Association represents the ten commercial trash collection and disposal companies whose names are listed at the end of this letter. We„ are very much concerned about a proposal to be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its August 22 meeting calling for a $2 . 00 per ton charge for trash disposal at the County Transfer Stations . We -,strenuously oppose this because it will result in a substantial increase in the ' cost of trash collection which will, of necessity, be passed on to the home owner and commercial establishments , and for the addi- tional reasons which are set forth in the enclosed suggested resolution. If this proposal is passed , it is estimated that it would result in an increase of between 30=; and 50 cents per month per home for trash collection, and an even greater amount for commercial establishments : - 1 - August 1, 1967 Mr. Doyle :Miller, page 2 If .you share our concern about this proposed trash transfer tax, please pass on your views to the -Board of Supervisors so they may have the benefit of your thinking prior to the August 22 meeting. A -suggested resolution is enclosed -for your consideration. Very 'truly_ours , Raul Rangel, President Orange County Disposal- Association ` Association members : 1. Cliff Ronnenberg 6. Warren Jaycox Stanton Disposal Jaycox Disposal_ 11192 Beach Blvd.. Katella Avenue Stanton, California Anaheim, California 2. Mike Gallio 7 . Dick Taormina M: .G. -Disposal Anaheim Disposal . 201 S. Balcom 512 East Vermont Fullerton, California Anaheim, California: 3. Sam Hambarian 8. Tom Trullis Orange. Disposal Garden Grove ' .Commercial 1665 N. G.lassell P.O. Box 52 Orange, California Garden Grove ,. California 4 . Jaycox-Schleining 9. Bob Babajian Prk Disposal Bel-Art Disposal 6351 Burnham 10719 East 166th Street Buena Park, Calif. Cerritos , California 5. Harry Blackman 10. Tom Blackman V-C Disposal Great Western Reclamation P.O. Box 518 126 East Dyer Road Stanton, Calif. Santa Ana, California - 2 - 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REQUESTING THE ORANGE 4 COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO REJECT THE PROPOSED TRASH TRANSFER TAX. 5 '6 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of 7 is informed that a proposal has been submitted to the Orange County 8 Board of Supervisors recommending the imposition of a charge or 9ltransfer fee upon commercial carriers at County Transfer Stations 10 where rubbish is taken for transfer to the County Disposal Stations; 11 I and 12 WHEREAS, the City of contracts 13 with a commercial trash collecting and disposal company for the 14 collection of trash and rubbish throughout this city;and 15 WHEREAS, charges to the contractor of the kinds referred 16 to above would indirectly become an added burden upon the taxpayers 17 of the City of since the additional 18 charges would ultimately be added to the costs of collection; and 19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of 20 is opposed to the principle of one public agency making charges 21 against other public agencies or charges against contractors or 22.: ,others who contract or furnish services to other public agencies 23 so that in effect said charges are passed on as a tax to the taxpayer 24 of said other public agencies; and 25 WHEREAS, the proposed transfer fee is discriminatory in 26 that it will apply to some contractors who, because of geographical 27 location, must use the transfer stations , whereas t'.-ose contractors 28 in closer proximity to the county dump sights can go directly there 29 and thus avoid payment of the proposed transfer fee; and 30 WHEREAS , it is the desire of the City Council of the City 31 of to make its feelings and position know 32 to the Board of Supervisors and other public boards or agencies and LAW OFFICKS - BLOCK AND BRICKNER 28 K.AMER106 AVRNU6 FULLURTON. - CALIFORNIA 92892 l PBLBPNONB 825-8208 ' 1 request that such charges as indicated . above not be instituted or 2 made . 3 NOW, THEREFORE, it is resolved as follows : 4 1. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is 5 hereby requested not to make any charges or transfer fees against 6 any public agency in the County of Orange or against any contractor 7 who picks up and disposes of trash under the provisions of a contract) 8 with the public agency. 9 2. That the Board of Supervisors be and it is hereby 10 � requested not to adopt fee schedules or charges against other public 11 agencies or to or against contractors or persons dealing with other 12lpublic agencies which charges would in effect result in an additional 13 tax on the taxpayers of such other public agencies . 14 3 . That the Board of Supervisors be and it hereby is 15 requested to adopt a policy which would eliminate as far as is 16 possible all duplication of charges or services by the County of 17 Orange and other public agencies of the County of Orange . 18 4. It is ordered that a certified copy of this resolution 19 be forthwith mailed to the Orange County Board of Supervisors . 20 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of 21 ; at a meeting thereof held on ' 22 jthe day of August , 1967 , by the following called vote : 23 24 AYES : COUNCILMEN: 25 26 27 28 29 NOES: COUNCILMEN: 30 31. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN : 32 . . LAW OFFICES - BLOCK AND BRICKNER as E.AMERIGE AVENUE FULLERTON. - � 2 CALIFORNIA 92632 'ELEPNONE 828-8208 I� 2 Mayor of the City of 3 4 5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Order and 6 Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City 7 of at a regular meeting thereof 8 � held on the day of August , 1967 . 9 I 10 . 11 1 12 City Clerk of the City of I . 13 � 14 .15 16 17 18 i I 19 II � 20 21 22 I 23 l . I.I 24 25 26 27 28' 29 30 ' 33. 32 I I LAW OFFICES 0 LOCK AND BRICKNER 8 E.AMERIGE AVENUE FU LLERTO N. - .ALIFORNIA 92632 3 ;LEPHONE 525-8208 I I TRIP Paul ..,,� ro Jones DATE 8/8/67 4 IN A resolution similar to the attached form should libe considered y the City Council on the next z 'g, agenda. 4 �w rr L?a 3 }3 k3 ka €w 11 PLEASE REPLY TO �D SIGNED DOYLE MILLER ADMII�+�TRATIVE.OFFICER - �rt t- Y+ { t fa . V` i 31t = DATE SIGNED Redifprm SEND PARTS t AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT d PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. 4651 DETACH AND FILE`-FOR FOLLOW-UP. ,.. . . x. . . . ,I - - _ - . fd ' ....... GTpy .n .J 4 O� a�RArF y�9 '', ;; v _?cP o hZ, CI T Y O F7 l/ t tJ'(/��/�C !/ o .. - $ y P L�Q - CALIFORNIA 'a ,1 V ��.�809� \` Y 1 21 E'C Gp�, . �[/ TX { = August. 15, . 1967: f,` 't -,, a-y -� r \vJ 1 ` f i +`_ 1 r- G r i - x-• P - -..1-f- ., zsi 0range County. Disposa I "Assn'. _ 'i . L 512 E Vermont-Street } S -1 _ :Anaheim, .Californe�a928.05 a . :_ ` 4` Attention:' Mr. Raul Rahgel, Presl. t 1 7. Dear :Mr. 'Rangel• rr Transmitted herewith is a co j PY of Resolution.. No.-:2616 adopted by the City Council' of theCity of--Eun•ttr t'on-'Beachh at•'theii re u1 1 g. g ar adjourned f - meeting held Monday,eeening; August �14,`_1967. etitions the Oran eCCo ,. Said-.Resolution p . g unty Board a . 4r �. of Supervisors to reject ;the proposed Trash `.Trans- -A } ..t 1 fer Tax r r The `Coancil" indicated :much concern on' the proposed :levy and ;appreciated your •:calling =it; to- . �r thiir:attent!on. . FWe have sent a certified copy . s Y o:f said rResolution to:the Orange County."�Board` of S;uperviso"rs:=arid trust that 'it4w11 :be considered; _ 7 ;,t ;the� tiiie: they'"hear revenue• proposals .for .the L :.fiscal year ,1967 :;69 -> :.If we.:can be :of further as`sistance'':in this ,, fe'Z1 ,free: to contect.::m of matt-`,I' please Y . fice: by , ,C . . .,.,i:,1.-Y.'').,".1..:.;�,.,-�I-.-�-��..m..�.-I.:.�-.,"..�....��.-...�;.-,..­�.,�A.!.._:,'.�:.,_!_-_1�,­­�.�.,:"-.I,`...'.�_.­.-.,:.-.,,-'*.�4-,,'-.,;_-._I,,'...:_­;..'—­:,._,...�-;,''",:m.-1,,_�.��4..,l�.':-_--I,.4:,.,V..-,,r-.�..,­�-,-..,-".--"-_.,..-17,.I;._�.f�.,�...,1.',*"--'.t�'.1".�,­'_,-'.,_;-,.��,,�-:.�-�.....,-,1,-,-:�'*tI.�,...-...-'......,-.II7�I�.t,,,'�-�,........:.-._..-:....".,,.�.��-..--.":�..,..I,...._.,,,�.!,-­.",,,-;.�,­�%I�-,.,,��-.-'..�"".-.-,*.-..,.,.-;...,7,".,..�:.,_-,I...,1..r.,�.�.­.-..,..IZ-..-..'�.-.�,.."..-�.",-,�,,...I''-:.,-.:-.:-�......'...'�-.,�.­-,,..,.*,...,...,...��_-"�,-%,.:._.,�:.I-.,,_.-:-_,-.,-,;I-'.��._.,."I.-.II1-,­,­-.".­I,i-�I.-_..�`­,..,:....�-*-".-....�-,_.1'-,�-��'.-..I�,..�,..::�I.!'!,:....,,:...:...:­-­�.'-,I.,,--,­,....1,:,!�:-:,,­.-I,.,,,-�....-.,.':.:.-:..-.-:�:..,t.`,._.,.:.�..`-;,_.�..-...,r,..­-,.,...-:;"�.-,,_"-..I..-.:1.�.:.!­...:-.,­...�...--....,i.,1:-;..'.'._..�!Y.,.,:-...:..,._��I­:P,.........I�:.,.-.-...I�.,,.:'�/.��-.",?-.,:.-..-,z-.::,.t,..::,`-.1I�:.,".:_..`.:�1-�:._,-"I.:�I..--.__..."-:�;-...-�'!,:`-*.::.��.,-__�-.,;-:-.­_-;�.,,.I­,­_.�_.�%,:-.,I_-,.%'-�1.,,Il-.."�..�-,11­O,,.­,-:-__-z�,'�.�7-.�.v_..��I_",­j-�_:-_-..-,-...,..,q.,_-:­I.:_.,�`I*..--.,.,--�.v�_.:l-_,,-�-'-,,_,-7.-,,:,.-"1,.:,.�-.­,1'.I.,..�,-.,-..�.%��.:'�'-,.I.,. .._�,_..','.,_.�.'..­I...-"..,.,-.."_-...`.-,.4�--1:..-:.-....''�.,,-.,...';-,.1,-..--'.,.I-...-_-..-,4-..'.."�..._.-.--�.I..I­.,.,-.,v._-)I;".,:.7.�?_.,,..,..',)-?.'...I..-..:_.,,�-..­..-'.;'.,,�",.z"..'__.-.-,T-..`­.--,.!I-w_.-�-'..��._I--�-.I..,-,-,t...-�_1- '-,.-,,..-,....­�;..-..".......".-;.......I.J.i..",..-��..,.I...m�''.,,...._:-.'-.....-�..�.--.._..,.--f_:.','I--I J;-.:.-�.­­:..,-..,-_.:.­--�,_�..:..�:�,_.I',':'-..,I_,,...��.:.1I,;�-..1f.._,._1�,..-,--',.r.�-.:J,.­-..-�.-"-.­.­.4-",,..�,.-..I.*.,;.,..�,,:...I-..-I-.�".,%.-.I7�?1.......I-�.�.";,-��"..,.'...,.-%.I...II.--_,.­:,-,..-�1:..,'-,,�":."l­...,l.�_....-.�"­..-..-7I.,...,..,.I.,,_:l,l-..:".,:'��,:,.__.,�..-..,.-.--�---'I�-,.-�q.,..i 1'�,.'!;-1.t---1C�,.-�k._..T-1.,�-i.�.-­.''..,:�"��:".�--1,--..--.I..:.:..�-�'.-:-,j-�.,.,,..',.--."'.-'-,�;:C..',-�--...�.�-..:;.1.,,',:--:-'�i._..I.­,-.,-l.-..-�.,'--l_...,..'',.-;:-.-',..I.:1I 0_-,I,--...,]-­:.�7.-..­.,*.,_.'.....-.;.-�.­...-..P`-1.��.__-:.:,�,..�­-.­�:-.-..­�.,_.�,--.-,.,z�-,,'..--'-,..-!l­­-"-I,.­�.--I...�.i,�....r.�:-,'."�I_:_.:1':'..-I.,"m,._.z.­�.-.­.:�..��'­,..-.,",.­T,;,-1...i._-.*,.�_�,i',-:.�...�-,.­:�_.:j;,�,.-,1,.I-._.I--..—,-.,'.4.�,..-!-_.4:,P".`._.�_�.��.­",.�­-,,t 1 Sincerely yours - a , - - i -r i f - _-i_ s y s f. r { t, i • r "t - 1 - '` - - r l a Paul C.. Jones ,,` ity erW..:C CI z h t . I . PCJ/s t . { i j - .4 `. • .off 4.' Y ... .a1. — - . .. - -, . 7- , _- �, r J. y -.r F r.. -Y•a;- �' `-y - y' 7 J-. i t E. Y .+ ,..�I_%"-,.".t'"��'-��.,-1,I-...,r.-_,..­I�.�i.��..z"I,,-,.,:,1�It�.'.`,,1.1-'�'�,I,_.�".,,�1-._"­�-�_-..A'�..,"�,�`.�.l_I,—:I�,"-I,,',.��t��.'...,%;.4 1'�-.�I._.—­-,�_....�:.,.��,.,",,'i.-.,�_',.-�,,1-:._i"I,�C�_t;!-..--_.,I_..�.��"�.',"`c,;,�,�,..­,,'��I:,,!.;-",k-,,�:,',,.1,�-,_- 1,'�.,..-.-",�,,-,.,..�I,,1,""_-,'.:..,.1­,I�,,.;,.,,..-'.�­*,�_�,--I--�,�-'­�,".�,_!:­_.I�I_,,,I;,�,.­,,�.I-,�,.I!.I,"�,­I*-.."��:",:�'.,..I-i%�",�'?I,,__,"",-,�1I,-,.­,�',�-"-.�,,,:I,',,,�"�..,",*1.',�-I��,,:.-Y I.�..._-��I,-.,-,;I.,,f,,",.'_'.;I'.."":',".�-��.,",.1,,�,,-�I.I,'-..,_�-.,�.�l-.­�"��_",.,,�_�.�,..I,-I.,-,:�.'.-..-,,1.-.�'-.,�,.:�-�--­�I,,.,.�;',,,.,�--.:­­.;�-1,��.;_--'-",II,­�,;1I�..',,"-."1,,-��,,".:,Il1:',�,,,','..,],.,I,,:�,­-.-;-.....,.I-.�-;-_,.-­--*-':_:-.',,,;,_w,­i.,,I,-,.y,..*�'-V�",',­z1­'I.-"�.,i-�.',,-i L1t.1�i--�,,,.,,,­,—'_,";%-,'�.-����:I.,�-,,,,I�,',iI,,'.;.-_-.-.,.--.�,.'..,,--,,,K�_4-,—:-_oI-�."i—,.,,-,,t.-,,�..:...,.�I'"..Ii Z,':_%"",��-.,.,1�.-,;�_�,"�,t',:,�r�.-,,�I-" O.�.,w�RarFo 6�� . C' • �,� c .r-- e . . rt *rrrtfc M '� CALIF{�RIIA ` -,. 1 Flu Y,. Pti I -t , .' , . HT R, -k�,- .t - - x:s;' s ti z }- x h F A i+ -� - .. 1 /Y�f �fJ + 1 Y k �� 2 {- Y Q� p .'3 � � .ir�, �lf tL Y t t - s.1` r tF a ,+. r.•• rY .+ } ; r" J - 3 r W ° t P- t ,,x x 2 + h t ,- k y - .i�. J Z . } ., T y D t - '. I ;4�(( � 1 i' Jos F � 4 - 4 t_ F ''' F x 'iw.i F ti t j T' t t i ., t .x ,`t R 5 r i+s 1 i t -Board'+ ( F`Superv�sors :. ? ` '+County of; ari hge =..; _ ' -x � N. Sycamore Street. ; anC Ana; California r r ` 1 j, _ J...)-• l 3 iGen�--l:emen'1 s_�R+F w It 5 -`-d. } #. r ,' k.i , 4 - ` .Weare txansmiting herewlth a 'certified °coppyyt x ,; of Rsolut�:on ,No., ,2616 adoptedbY the City Counc�tl` � ., � .t ' ,'y`-" , " of they C `ty.'.of .Hiin ih-i Beach;;at; their regular * r•t -., 'ad,�o irtiid- meeting:t ld August 14; 1967. ;c , , r ,. . r !. ,I t �-°V 3 ; C' + =,Said.,;Resolution, gel, s .,your.Vonorable'Body' t ,, t to refuses the .propc►sea Trash Transfer'.Tax".:which t `< has :been iec'oaimended try the°Curity A'iuiinistrator: F 1 y 11 sincerely yours; ` 11 ! { Y- 1 t T Y- y Y f t x r Paul C p,�lones �� ' �} t � � .,;-..t _ City.C ,erk J+ is x _ I _ , T 'f ,,, Eric;..'. , Y += t5 `5 x t �� 7 k r 4� y r t R i- . tl ''s -, t t Y l t ,t - i -, t t, t F b r - - } 1. N t X b,Z t 3 ` - ,�''4 y y t k t t t -' ! .1 1 "<n t .. .. x t ? -,',I .1, k tit- Y M 1. }` 1. k # �n' i ?t u w 1 f } c. ��NTINGTpN 4 s 0�' PnRgj f ef`�9 f f y .� O (f • L r ? CITY QF `e 7 .. r `Ile o ,-ray Q = - — ^e o Q CALIFOR'NIA COUNTY Cp1. is _ . :." d r t- Ft t r_� •l �I - 1. t - - - atF August 15, 1967 °' �, l > a _ - , ' ff -. -! 1 Al. - - - f - Y j a, o i _ . 1 - _ e. p s T . . _. .� R ! f i - -- Nir Winston Updegraff w= `r' h " J: Orange County League of Cities 635 Ramona: Laguna°Beach, California - r t J Dear Winston. :r '' ` thin here0ith ,a. cert ; I am,;transmi g ifed co of • pY Resolution;.No.' 26;16 which. was;adopted by the='.Cit r-- of.`Huntin ton -B•eac y _ - "- x Council of. the City_ g hat their - _ regular. adjourned meeting held.August 14 196`7. t,. : r -I : This,;mater was discussed at length .by the City ;, , Council and; they oppose' the Letting; .of such 'tax, _and j eornmend the Orange-"County _League: of Cities for their - ®lettriess, :wind interest =in tliie-matter in =bringing,. X it' to the';attention of- the various .mun . pat ties, -s - - . , '. r 4L l - - .- - tt - `--"I I rcan,be of further assistance in this .matter. �_' ° $ ` please feel free to :contact me, _ - Y = Sincerely r ., yours, i i y 1 r:F Paul C. Jones = ` *- ..PCJ/s.t r , . ... r�.-' - r- n-' - �F_ =,Enc: ' • j _ 5 ' - J , _ _ i_ tt 9 .• , T 1. .- _ r ,. J r -;. Z - J t ' _ 5 L ♦ R .-( - _ J. y f j t a� `,t ; 4,_ , f V _r 4 :` e .. k _ _ _ - r - . . : - .i - - - r =1 l3 _, �� t- r i Z , •V.' 1 - _ _ 4- 1 G � '- c - - C!di7 alt�Y�14�L if- 'xYk9• 'I.- �- o X' x :5 _. yqq,to , t T /1�y _ �_ fit, i __ 4 ` �r�l+!�.i 1L7V ,'•�'--TH C I i .OF AWIN TO CL�#1. .:= 11V i GE1 C Y '@.. I ,,:A ZT 2 5 S HPs_-Ht'NTIN `d �l k3 A,CR QIBk �G .-ODE BY ,. t _ Q Sg 17 i�gE� , att g cy hae ar9�ia a .thl i �:ity !�main i. - - j is Ji��� .: } I p�`r c , i.- - +„ _- - + t- - Z - �y I e - 4- - - .' 3;8 dog Co co 1�:�Ciot 'Alm-1.1 spo+ ax ti trash` artd 'ga bage ` :in thr - ;.:t' % _- . _ " 9 `c#pe.i r3 e g du p 1d i yr c�u :i ewerito f a Ian heuL _- _ , . . - - ' `l o 1. , ... - , I . 4n4 thE: necessity;o ih e�prLy acquiitlon `.s�f new tsckb and>. 11 u , a by the _pres sit c©1lector ,of said trash and � rbage; r ,12 r `: ._•. ;13 i f.nance is e - :� � - this +co� ary.,toxro►vid � rr�r the. , - Y 14 mate i to p serest I 0 of the ubl c health and -eef1. ty, to b : - a ,i s,. . i; _hy the early execution of Ia cflntract for it a collect•. .tiI. .: . - - 18 :inn, ti�aspt� t ► rn iud d#;eposl tf�ffia_ct garbage and:Crash; � � . 17 - ,. > 'The City coxi_ib .� of the . t of Nn nt�.ngton Teach .d .o�- h a s Y 18 Z :: t },_ ;: r t fr , ,;it .n It�6i 19` - :. : actin :i.1. at;• tie fallowing net secion ... ale tier�b Y, 20 . Y Chfriia�rice. 4 t 1. t -,�d .tts ih , R-W tittstbn flea Coco which. new sec :21 . ,. :,� _ :tiobs 0 a�tl. resd :iyn words s `��guxes as frsllows: 22 _ K , Sit rig -�aLm aw .;�Ccr Yae r�s n" is the operatipn of gather-° 1. 1 in tcaethcrpotC .ng to a`punt ±f disp4s1, �tf;. �ar i 24 viduell .or ,H baggy ar trait , ithsx iacut Y1. romb tined j 4nd im aj�` i ._ 25 _, r .: , -� 4 - - _ 1. f. h h l-b" ar�d r0&tgtions pet'taininlr o this eperai ; i anc w t. t 28. . tof +� angeQt ; btxtet ane �rensr atBti.Qn• 27` �. t, 281. - - � ` k. 3 :- ``29 _, 3 g� . . • r ; a S - J. 't..� J'_. _ -t� _ _ P r :: �, t.- _ .. _ " .., y t t: _ r -.. _ c 7 r - _ - ? '. "1 y 2 1 'r 11 5- - 4 , 3 7- .. , - _ito-, €� xa$ a� srt°aCe e Co1lob 'I erVic® oaf { ,� - _. a 1�r, dulad p is, up ep a : 1"av � y Y 1. - W44S J4 • �J4� v1. i.i_ 47 #47..�:.fi z .itia'i �r Steil V' iJ iV�Vd H V'•ii •, - . _g r` - Y S. _ _ _ _ i .." "l 4 . - .. ---.5 - ♦ -..yy, iT.�tee} y/� /!��w} - // �' �y `{" 'yH_M q¢��ay {/�- i4��yy �{ , {j� r, �'"g�. • ! 1 } 5 't 7 - - CY� C�4__ - IY.__- 7-1:����, x + tid- +h �� �•li'I 1 - I V� "' VJ `a� l 1 G f� Y A V M . fi - __ - - • _ _ .' 8 , .,' CSC # +E1 ` 6; t �"�Ft��i �+�Y'�mJ9�r ..��r�., fl� >ti:��'��tarC - -j�Xl e���Y'9l" , t 9 1-b: 7`a 'coa tr $ uli �°.-:,, tt - fQr t cn cat a `;' tr i� t3 z _ • .1 - ..' 1 ".�� i+Y��iii�` Y .� =-1}� AyL 1 V �F"�S�'� H�iiIV ,: _ - - - 12 - nb . , Aed rg - I. he 5.., 3?12, P �, ��.� r��`������n �'��a�,�., 6. `6_ .�. - - 1 1. fa( x8m 2 �- - _ a.. _ 5r r 15 IArT t .w so rttar4i Beer . gar v- Od �i �` 38;8 ,1i1E3 R y ; 'is :id, -t J'! 61"' od� Y +rD +3, .is d 9. 1 x"a9l ;(aoYi �i i+.,, - - - . S -: 517pB ;x3ti ��, it@rl� r :� � iydo � ri a PCs :t - - .. - �'. - -. - _ _ :18 J, . ro �i�� t t d fin + �ie r3,o1 ClAW. 'I, iie �' 0 4'aS•. . r is i,.hnt? d6rs#sto l ��c ::; rb t x� .ta�a t i � , -&i ; , = :. r 21 r �oxc+a11 1g4 ctitr `or `�� �9�mxy {. + q _ i - - -•22 s. .e"ar�dl or : i - i- air atro , � i ..: o t a +21c . b,r r tiIl `��i � �'4 5 23 � of . pity tt• 6 - - x�a�aIr r iffi6 , �, - 25 -to - qi ..,O 'x ; ai s i� �r 3 7 ��t`, ar "t�, ' , "' , ®ryp yx } f J i i - .., .. A _�' ie agar i8 5 'P,' _ ; , 27 4 r oo � . :ftD , �at��� - �s�� '�+t�t •'oz� a' 8tr s� or .li ',. 1t - - . . �. ;� r 2s ►y . fir"+ � . �.on 0 a •:�� loo��+�ti in 6 pI�c� _d� �����Y' , .,, 1 .. - ` k , y L 29 _ t _ _ } 1i- _ i t , L. II 1 5 j s y .� a . ' t ti x -: . t u � • ; . t a i - 1 } - -:; : , - r_ -._ Ti% .� 0 L 3 w' r , ro= . y r - 4 • n:�w r e� �� i i . � . _ r ` > � � a � �-cjc s ii d i .�:Q?�16 �in Sri t;!ar t�2`• i ,1 6 Y�- - .._ A _ .f u ,a�'b�" or —16d irba o ,_itti t Ais S � 1 x'ov cis It 6 ., ` Cue r e; �l bo .0 �iw4.I,e -Al-all--ham ht pt �t r'. 1tl It- il, times �� r + gx3y cl� ► id .' �9 1 r�eicleffiad 1 calk _ 8 ; , ::4 % na d- •tr;Lp ® ;WsaWti�,cd -trash tad r 8 N 9 i.r x s q 4 py, !� a u �f t_ - -rt> ' - �ilf Fa -1 g -bvid6d. ' i-LTJ -b6043.• -� a� �r c� �►" �A - ��v�a.E , - < trSparted _tE,,_ eix c -tie 11i. 1.- - ,, M , 3.1�,rs aV.id hIg _� a r __: r _ - - _ 7 - } i - - _ _ C 13 pp :i y �� ;ax z, -c' - ,_ i ` 14 vial, € i r i. p it ;S aZ provi i. 1'1fl co-t.- wit x - - _ . r ag t .:11- e ,:trael svxv�de: :'F�r 9 c x' S c ry :c5 i�l er `� k'�'�t C - 1 _ _ f µ 16 ' crv3. c t{�Ot do-- r ice t e urt l c�u ttlty of =tr zY�LI. u1 . ,. - 1 . t0-I Vie- rfe lk. � ,r X w _ . ., 19` I­a��.�jujjtr�3 1' i Rope d t►jc °ram$ c aarvico' f&&- S�aI]. be. cH r• �d L . A - 20 {z,N ib t-she at r to d e :3 ty, : ` 'rz a s a d fie_: 4 ;: t. -., 4 . on - :21 � os�r� : c , ► �a � � 6rd-j � tts t?jd v�Iume 4- , :22 23 vim . *20 e� r���c� __�� �-widen-0 ��% �r� �r i,�rcl)ort�.�► zee �c� " ' - _ - - y; 1. - L ' L f 24 , K � �s A cat' c'jw= rs :tex1 ."fiia. �' _s1= a c1. etrard bJ { - - - - - - -' _C a '25 ;.�i c€ } i to c©tM sed -E9f t 8 3 tyr �►.xi 1Y3 8r' d- tvr ►.06��,.er6 �f' * ; Y 26 rtb@ !A`�.tg; G:3ur�ioJ- - a'd DsS - i t r3'��V� �Xd t .:. «t.: I r'- �. t 4 f! 4c�r n '* P'k : '27 = sv � r�' may _ et� ir� , ,< �' t - L i Y 28 % �, 29 f: } f Y1. - .. ,t �- ) - +�� " ,.•-- - - _ i --' ` _ - _ 4 r ,"s;;.,...�.'IL-"-::­,...2-';._�_1-."�.-_-'.,),.;-"­.:--i..'..-',-,-p.."�..­-�----­,...-�.,t,"...�-.�-h.�. ,I-­'_T� --I.�--:-�,'"-'!.1,-.--_',.�'�.!,v..,d_,;a�_.�'.,--,..-",-,.'E.;-,,�,�.,,-s;,,I.�,!i-1.'.-­_t�,'-�.I­-;--.­.!�,.—�vTv--I��_'.�.:5._w.j­..,,!.-,.:.z_��---:i-:i-.:_-I.,,--,"�.­-E:-..-�,-'-_f',-.-..%_-­'--.-'t jZ-,*:,�:,,��.."P 7,.j:"�-��..,...-�.-o.---....;--!_�.,-7:..-.1..-�'.�:,!._-':_�-t..­-,,-_-..-L�,_,,'�p-_.I_-�.,:.,­�_,�...._.;.'��,._,;.il-,,,.�'.,z -�­­;...---,-1...-..,A..-..;.--,,:.-,I�..%-i_ ........,,I_ .�%b.,.`-,.­—N".�._.�-;,:....i-_..,._—�'�,'I_��'..."-�-,i-.'�-;7.�,,.�'..,..'-.,_-,.,..-.'.i.',,�!,,,'.�....'-.'. - - - - - - - - Y w I �o,:_,...t-.�.�.-- �V�—1-*_.I"..­ __!1.-.--�1,-,--.-.,�­..-�.,�,..-Y._.,�­�.rI-,.,..__­;'-."..I,..,�-.:--:-',,-� -; . t r _ . ,d-- - 5 _ _ 1- _1 , - t - -.--. - _ - " Y^/ �{j(]�.+ �!+; {!] �j.,`�yj a� , r,, }F- 1yj�j(� {r 7[}t1 1•a r t �- . {la 6'�Q I,1�Id - N. �-M`PV �/� hQ YtIY tl0u�` el NT� 1 Ub 'T iW i 6 r 1 r st. i` ���+� ..i• : 'yrh@R f 42{ •"t►1 U� n£ ,*FiY %�Ci h3` ('. C9x'�r-t �T r �:4 , , '�•�y �iyy - - p •�yr "} -•. �_y:,f .�y Vie,�? _fit i � ' �Ml�.l YS.� ��i CiI3A.'i V pi/� r _� 1!>0A h y �1. •:{i�t -7P7 t7 344i !V`t}h , t a _ _ - _ - - > - S,� t t..�j�,c �Y/^� 3s ryl� yy �i a- +♦� . j. - y�_A } yq. �}�q7• ..k�� y� �g_, _+� _ ;i k'l 1�i�KW lTCYJ_R r3M� S.l ;+ � -ii�S/ -�� A`V U Si i-'A i O- ..0 kL T:JC ll® t .'.3 ,:�-- s (� )J l.._:�.-.—_�,_:,1 p q p t dtff p yy fit,�pa jy •�y ,y� yy /p } py t �yy�{"'�p� yt� �} �} �pq i��{-�} :'1.!*,..-"­."_.'--�:7-.�., %--,-�. b !4 *.t {- tX vt �l V® ,f � 3�- 3' 4#ut aka- _ -S✓Y{•i��•�.to ,}IJi 42b.i CAL 4.-rCl' -`t i xta g t -. - a �.p.- -.,.... �y'_:i ?p��` --gip ...t�y �}� �.t:, _ r h y'�� �! s . gy��y - r- h 1 - �} _ -. .SIC i,o', .�.ah ' 4i W W.+ ,._4.. 'w'�.+Ie SYL S- al'1 .,�•__tT.f(� 'tS_l� TI "8 � �1Af{i+ ✓<i 4.5-.:_4 _ _ Y-1 �1j -` ` i `"Z\ -_:`, .. _ ,1 . �^, l_f -tom 4 fir, -. ,- n1 + _ Y - ' - - _ _e . T' ➢ 5 r _,. ri �t 1A pay' r� r� r��T ap�y Fn j '< q.. {" .{. _ _` + ;1J - (i. . tal .r i � -'aO �d�'. 5�ie t:p r•.+ �S��7 f.'L� i_1�8 Zs-+ A $ S j1po . V 1� ,g, .�M.b 4+ i ' c 14titinsi"�i�* t3" �ut� ..t�: te'c►13� . a _ - _ - S ::�6 j t o ,ire 78x' '- C , d . C amond-od-' FA , r � ; 17 ,, g =18 + G � C1�t�E3�, 9- s 31= +� y� r I 19 . r •. t 4 .�.."-..-..,...:_I,.,.... f 20 �W,erq - --4o iml ern a .. .,i 3+� r . ., repair © `.. a , r Kt. i t3 ,Al i �'+ yE • $'E$ � $ ^. 'l3 r�°1.�1�1�`@ �4h�:170 k'dd ' Off'' �UC�- ; � �. 21 L r 3- f ...^.A.K-,.-m... "-..--.-,,�.;-...:_-a',.!�.._. ,�-:���-_-_-�­,�... N - - -' - _- - - - _ - l g g z 22 f -; .�; -' 2 , p 23 _. ,r m e :. ;C I _16 Pbint tdj ap6nt tip w i z 24 r L - - - - e - - _ } - - y q r 5 t 28 � �} i-hfYw �•F1 - V �%�^a�4J5Li� lF �.F•,) Lf." Vl" � i1L':}WI • d°6 .4�i. - ,, �_ 27 _ *_ 2 v \ y 1 Ir• - . c.-.-. k., - Y - - - .t: 28 Y s r _ _ "- Y _- i i 29 G.. .ilk --.2 ✓ - - - - 1 ".�.(j at ' - y a • Y i _ `i ,:� . -- �t =� 44 fj33'�� {( oj� �w . - - - t..a _ ,i?.. ° y.� +1. - t.- t�_ .d - �''I,%.-.�--��:�-7:�' ...� .-7, -. . . . . .. ..... -� -.. , � ��d`L f R # t?f: �,"+9''�arrm Otoirefram anc ' - ® ipc ,.l l - - 3 : 7 „ - , 1. 5 G � a a-3 ec Luc" i.time, 1. 4> 1. V -c F Ga ' -i - L v t; - -.:. - J ,, tlt:� E3l Co a It $ t•"t ' . 7 ,� - - - - - -A - i -t.- i : 4 <v.r. O 6� c tdc _ �r -aa4ah tt bo r pea Ap a CA�.lt3��pXivz:'* �rT 1E;1� _ : s 7i. 11 a -'-b �'�ir, ��� ��.�,c��ni.c.aLa e r �:��e% �,��' �e r�ica�atmcles a ` =� a .. z Z�tl E: x t 9 �� a, rr y ->. q k�,,(,kr - lrrt may. -(��, 1� , L -_ Z j': �L Px +3- '- _Q ; �y�r it -dltb Y,�IJ'i1F3 �`.e's' " -, �.�',_;0z)ih-4tac 6t6i U© } y+ . �- 1. 'bAa C e.,. S.#:G1 V3�Y _ -I.M F.i$h \Y-;_ G -.1. ". .. .t�4 M1iJ -7�} fs -•. P f7LR". �a=3�.Nfb,a �4d 'a .il, - . ; � - ; , , rboop 4Lcl +s Y• �� ii .d ice' tf� fiig � - 4 l- 1 . _ _ - - ._ - �y' +- ,j r - f -V. �'�} f {qy,jj p 'j`'y /� �R'y y� }�,yp�� 7yw�- 'S - j /�( waTiep.�} I - 1-- �F�j�* s � � .•^.9' 'Et�� 2'V d-, 41 Y..- ""{ �8# L/s1�P� ft 6h4l Y� �,w�-a ` ---,t x 'f?Y' C l td� '©� i►$ 'L�1ore: ��,3--n �"1'V0 .-�� �P -. �� � kok h Ct1 a— . � lb : , s- $ c- -r' r i.-, - - - - - ' w= �r �t sll �� cc� � �13Q ice: t���lu Via: '�e 6 t C 1 .'l�: - it ,lam t - _-'t y � - ,1�y i i X�� � � ,YfQlff )itvt 'e' �b73.1f y tGr i�f '�Sf�@.y,�, ,4iV ,Mn}', i• L7i. -�4.i,f��L U�1® �_ k , % r t P}. CC3l�YaQ '.8 - L - Lis' - -*ll% ► -- Lim -:U"}© �'`j'o ,r, - -19 `.� P '�Pm '� 4Y Y et t�c� >1e x,�r. i,W - " I drdlua�ao��t of - ,� -t #, 4 -.1 0 Ming to t o .. , . bi ro of rt . %.,r 'use b 20 I ., ki. T�bb�.3.) . . ! 21 . �GPaS S t 5 - r; i .t - - - 22 ��j/� 9 t� ., y� 8 Cfd:' °oder�i /q/q�pp► :.y/ /� j, 5y�ry� t G �.h.�Y=�w Vii.� - f , lS°� # ': •e Tv'Ffi�ri- �i.LM �diW.t>i.Ll� +- { 1t C .. _ . - - - - - 24 t and ss fa of: V%a c��i�+1n�3 ©f tt�� �#ft. V v� � �tn��� x - z =z y 25,.:_ eaa. vehidr� . z e b . S: :s b' 't��cCYi k :d f�.io l � ��� � . 26 _ r , - , Ysfl1 . et 'eCti .t� atl k� xi foa�6e ft�� q ` a - - _ _ y ". t r Y. y y k ♦� i a N ` Qrt� 925 L �' ti ` . _ ' { t 1 t } `• L t ,y ,.,,�.1-t..,.4;.--.,.-tF,�,_�.,-*.-�.�_k,,-.,.`--I.,_�,.,.,�%_._.--;I',_-,�--�.'�-_.,,_-....­.-'','"',..,�,�,4�-l'_.i-..."Y'_"�-:,--:,1t,��:_..-.,..­-,.,�-.:'".,�.;:..':�'�--I-I-..,..,,-I 7.-.I_,l—,-.,-,_;�,�—,_:..-I,."_-.-�..:�--�-.Ii*,--.".:-'���,-,,-,�-,.,,-I,,"-�'.'*,,��%—,.,­,,­�,"'�I`,"�"- Z L //% - s _Y ! _ S -I i. Sect id" 49'' Abe city C1Otk spoil-:certf, y tt� tb pass s �a d-� ? L t" c: 4 .;. ago; and-ad4gti©n 4f ` a1 riArdiinanc aril tbt cAuSft t�the-s-Qamt ' >t 'be-:pv►bl .abed �bk' one Lusett.ion ixr tie fluff tfs tort ,. ea h r `Z _ ` i , .. - e g, =a Be y.nQ�arpaper k pY i�ted. p�blief�ed and c�zcuia'ted a 8 1 t X s k'` :. .f +. + - 4 0. ;1- `z ,Ld w \t ! the; Cit f :O tit'tgtEnt SeticB �f.fGi"t1l, 3 r 7, { F �. $ ►ss .hy tba city you ci7 of the :C ty r of , : _� _ N.s n y.. 4 . u-t .gt6 .Beach; �Cnli#o �nia, this � 4 da r.off' ptembex' g ► /(JRI % t j ' .,,Y F .r Y ' - 7 A 14 m s y a. 3 'i,.I L -i b- - d .. - -fL N. w Y 11L Hobert' , abet F L n x z _ rig i -�� _ - ; ,s_...- . �� - `'-_-- _ p S'- r 3 �13 a :-T 4 i. F - '.K .t' x \. t 1 - i S - - ,H f t- t ) yij - X _ `,$ w., it TA {S '�Y{� A 7 K S L 1 =17 Y x Y i n y ! Z. °- 19 ;'* _20 } 4 4 y 4 i .c W. F 21 1 _ { F - y-- _ - r i , - . 22 ' :. , K f + 23 N r v lt, tFy. ,;. T .. .. - t r 24 ,y j . t Y- k ..J - + 1 j _- - - S- •; r -"'4 f1L� 4� _y r\.: `d 7 iC`a, -f,.,. -J _ ry :s c Q ,x 28 F �y F. c r n 27 '` - ~ . \.d` -2V. , r : ` iu f -1 Y'' 4.-. a 29 � , , . A . > �-4 ` f - o` !N - X tit 1. L ti c , x s z vn = . .-. _.-• — Ir. y a _ DY'd, �1p, 925 Y ;. _ _ _. _ ✓ r .. 1 { �.. ; i 7 . i c_ 1 2 - , .. Y y 3 County of crag e, Y :)� ss city' of iuntington each ­) s " 4 ;� r .. _ a . _ p - - 'F- r 5 1 A __ - - :'r 4 s s j_ _ _ l r I!-j �'AQL ri. a�0'��'.3I ;thy C1U3.�► f+3.etl t3i� oual�f iEhC3 arid, aQt 8 - , f ,_. 9.ng city Cl�r�c of t.e City ot'r untix. g zjeaeh- and, -sx-of ficio 7 4 . �K s" , ,Clerk of � a° �%ity Cr�uhcil 4f paid City do' hers k S 8 ; by cox't1.fy= T - - - .i ..- _ _ 9 4 _that the thole numb�x':of _rae tber y ©f the city Canal pf 1ne :CIt'. �f untix�,ttcs reach i� rive; _ :thht:the.fore;©in ot�dfnanoe 30 - - r. 11� was _read:to, said _Ci�;y GounciY .t 'reul .r.'meeting thereof ha ;held on. the-' 20t b: .., ed of A�Sv6t 196� as�ed° a3� l-- .� f 12 t .- . . _ . j ,: :13 �g S n read to d 3.ty C un011 aL�a r�.,tlar meeting therea€ , �d bzi the ,� t day .ot' ... .�� 8-.r.,......... i��2 nci was 14 . a - i . . - - -.[ Y. ' f Q ;�€ s."edndc adoptedf by tho: aff' rmati � g©ta off' :©rc #han a - I 1S4 3 16 i Qor�.ty: of all tie member;, .'of Sr ici {:ity iouncil. Y z _ ,r r _ r C Y ` ' s s ' - Wells�J Gifler�. Weicr, -t ambtrt a_ ,.. �� ,....--.-- - - _ 19 '- Y T c :, Councilmen: _ r` a 204 - - 21 NonQ > } j 1.i a .. _ r _ - - 22 ,�. C �� i1+yen •AyS Zm. ova c X - " 4 - 23 Staarart = _ , }. J j 2 . . ti `25_, 26 'hUt C 27 Y r uit . C1�rk and. ox o ficio Clerk of the f' Ca ty Co�.nG7 . of the: Git ofur�tingto Y �` 28: r -t 41 h C�1if iR2 c_ L. X -. I �... L ..�_. .. .. L - __ 'l. f.. - _ - — - , Y +' a Y - 'i- - - z: - - % 1" r. r ter. '�' ,� �� y � �' � � y °°� �� � q �""� � � '-, may o°,� '�- �, �`m - �;t. � - � r� �, JAMES T. AGA.IANIAN—OWNERS—J. C. AGaJANIAN MUNICIPAL SERVICE COMPANY MUNICIPAL CONTRACTORS" Office Phoned DAvis 3-5055—FAeulfy 1-5323 P. O. Box 69—G"a°idena, California " June 16 ; . 1964 Paul Jones , City Clerk City. Hall 2nd Floor, 5th & Orange Huntington Beach, 'Calif Dear Mr. Jones : :. Recently a group of local people have come together and organized a corporation called OCEANIC DISPOSAL ENTERPRISES , INC . and we have a sanction from the Federal Government to take our . rubbish and garbage and dispose of it in the ocean. We all know that the "cut and cover" properties are all filled up. The only way to dispose of rubbish and garbage permanently is by taking it to the ocean. We are inquiring from various cities and individuals to know approximately how many tons of garbage and rubbish they have for disposal - either daily or monthly. It is very necessary for us to know- the tonnage above mentioned -in order to build adequate barges for the purpose. Our plant is located between Long . Beach and Wilmington. All that will be necessary is that you bring the rubbish and garbage to our barges and unload it and we will dispose- of. it . Our charges for this work is $1.00 per ton. However, it is predicted that on a larger volume, the charges will be reduced. Your early reply together with the information contained in this letter will be greatly appreciated. Respectfully yours , OCEANIC DISPOSAL ENTERPRISES, - INC. James T. Agajanian, Secy. JTA/vmb Lt .i .a j t June Igo' 1964 " Rainbow Disposal Cempany 2139 South:Aroadway _ Santa..Ana, California - - Attention: -Mr. Paul Loumena Dear Paula ` I .am sending -you herewith a copy of. ' letter received yesterday -from Oceanic Disposal --Enterprises .Inc. , _ presenting._: proposal for garbage_ disposal through use of,--.the_:Pac n it Ocea .. � I ':don't know wWW 0 :his would be of::.any:interest to you or' not�: however,, :-I am sure •that :since the ,:City contracts: all our garbage .disposal through your company, - we,-:would.,n6t ,be._directly, interested'°in, ;their:"proposaa . . Sincerely,'youra.:- Paul C. Jonee. City`.Clerk: _ PCJatr Eves (l) - I 0 i I CUWpllp l�Y'Np �� i 1�V �ov9� I ., Approved. Dispos al..Co►npany 302 Huntington Ave. Huntington Beach, Calif. 1. Edward Osepian, 33 302 Huntington Avenue Huntington Beach, California (Business and Residence) George Osepian, 44 15522 Cordary Lawndale, California (Residence) 302 Huntington Avenune Huntington Beach, California (Business) 2. Douglas Aircraft-, Missile and Space Division Huntington Beach, California. 3. Front Loader Packer Truck. 4. As a resident and Citizen of Huntington Beach, and also being in the Bisposal Business, and with the growth of Huntington. Beach, I feel we need more than one Disposal Company, and. I feel I should be given the opportunity of serving my City._ 5. None 6. According to the needs of Douglas Aircraft. 7. Reo 1954, 18 feet, with packer and Grange color. 8. (See Enclosed) 9. See Enclosed.. 10. We shall be glad to give you any. other information needed. (R '63'PM C i Ij EE 12 y; C Y I E I 9; e,•y,� -3; C, E 8 54 E1 p 6 - f� CITY OF FiS i HUNTINGTON BEAM I � uw 7 Since 1920 ARTHUR W. MACNEIL CO., INC. gnsarance - Weal6state 144 East Philadelphia Street . - 0 Whittier, California a Telephone OXbow 8-9931 0 (Area Code 213) December 5, 1963 Mr. Paul Jones, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: Approved Disposal Company 302 Huntington Avenue Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones: In our telephone conversation of December 3, you indicated that you had received agreement from Mr. James B. Plunkett, City Attorney, to accept notification from us that the bond for the above firm had been applied for, and will be issued, in lieu of the actual bond. As I indicated to you there are mechanical difficulties in issuing a bond on such short notice, among these difficulties being the credit check, bond form information, et cetera. We have submitted a bond application to the underwriters with the request for a performance bond in the amount of $10,000, such bond to contain the information necessary to meet the requirement in your Article 324, paragraph S3241.1. As soon as this bond is received, it will be forwarded to you immediately. If you have any questions regarding this, please let me know. Very truly yours, Kenneth B. Noel f Rd F a Dollars $ `. ;; .For. ACC XPIT MOW PAro AMT. 09 ACCCwN7 , AMY.PAID C»Kt[ SAIANtv MOWI out QYQEA ex� pro M Rec lved Fro Address— Dollars 09 For__ ACCOUW HOW PAID A/AT. ETt CASH r AC-COU n _ AM'..ivo CHECK oatANCR Me ct+tOtp eK Otte 6k*M?— n• � STATE OF CALIFORNIA LQS ANGELE ss. .n COUNTY OF---------- - -------------------------------------- On this Mill................... day of. D2C@1Il172T------------------------------------------------------ 1 .........-, before me - -.PETRQrFF ............................................------- a Notary Public,in and for the County and State aforesaid, residing therein duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ------------------------------------------------------ John �--------------------------------------- --- ' Ingersoll -- —--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- known to me to be the Attorney-in-Fact of Pacific Employers Insurance Company,the Corporation that executed the within instrument and also known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of the Corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that such Corpora- tion executed the same. ��---------------v. � J Notary Public in and for the Statq of California,County of...LQS__4NGELES MIS-B-A My Commission Expires April 9, 1965 - r Cont-7-A PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY A MEMBER OF PACIFIC EMPLOYERS GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES HOME OFFICE-LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 01-B-90869 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, .APPROVED DISPOS.4L COMPANY 302 Huntington Avenue, Huntington Beach, California as Principal—, and the PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, and duly licensed to transact a general surety business, in the State of California , as Surety are held and firmly bound to the CITY OF HU14TL GTON BEACH, C-ALIFORNIA, as Obligee in the sum of TEN THOUSAND AND NO/100- - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars ($1-0 Onn.00 ), lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said CITY OF 14UN^TN ,TON 1•A u„ CALIFORNIA for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and successors, jointly and sev- erally,firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That WHEREAS, The above bounden Principal has applied to said obligee for a certificate of .Public Need and Necessity in accordance in artieale 32/+ S 324.1 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for conduct of Refuse Disposal business within the City Limits. . N014 THEREFORE the condition of the obligation is such that if the above bounden principal shall comply with all the laws and ordinances pertaining to said business, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Huntington Beach and any person of persons who may be injured or caused financial loss through any failure on the part of said licensee to comply with said laws, or because of any misconduct on the part of said licensee in carring on said business, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect, and this bond shall insure to the benefit of the City of Huntington Beach and to any person or persons and to all employees of said licensee; and the said City and any of said above mentioned persons may maintain an action on this bond directly in its, his, her or their name or names, and this bond may be recovered against more than once and until the full penalty thereof shall be exhausted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the seal and signature of the said Principal is hereto affixed and the corporate seal and name of the said Surety is hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney-in-Fact at Los Angeles California this 12th day of ILc ember 19_-63 APPROVED DISPOSAL 5qkTANY PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY Executed in Duplicate Premium: 150.00 for the term By thereof. John C. Ingerso Attorney-in-Fact Cont. 7A 2500 3.63 I!I No. II; II i BOND OF !� I! TO i AS !! Approved this day of ! 19 ! • � - ICI .� II! - Filed, 19 County of PACIFIC EMPLOYERS I Il INSURANCE COMPANY I�! ijI