Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHolly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District 93-1 - Resolution P01 RE BakenandAssociatc a!:H.C4LIF. 300 Paolflc CORN Hwy.,Suit*301 (til Mau,sueel.) F 46 FM °9�1 Hup4nguon Bcrch,CA 92648 714-374.0346 FAX 714-374.035() x turn i N N c`; FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET rn rn nt 7 �:7Q q ..G 't DATE: ATTN: COMPANY: _ 7 FAX #: RE: COMMENTS: r -�L fit_ t t A�•���..�.,�._� a FROM: FAX # : 714/374-0350 Number of pages including cover sheet : f TIME: : - J OAM 323 P02/02 FEB 22 '94 15:46 � AFT WHEREAS, the Regional Council of the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG)is set to consider whether or not to adopt a draft Regional Comprehensive Plan that currently includes 15 chapters and 13 components; and WHEREAS, the draft Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) touts the"bottom up" nature of its development,yet most sub-regions,including Orange County, provided input on a narrower range of mandated components; and WHEREAS,the draft RCP raises concerns over a potential expansion of SCAG's role in the region or assignment of new roles to it that should be the subject of further discussion and deliberation by local government representatives; and WHEREAS, the.draft RCP does not discuss how implementation of its policies will be funded at a time when local governments around the State are struggling to meet financial commitments to provide basic services; and WHEREAS, SCAG review of plans/projects or proposed local general plan amendments or updates may be perceived as duplicative and bureaucratic until the implications of the RCP can be discussed and quantified; NOW,TBERE.F'ORB,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of finds that SCAG's focus should be limited to RCP components which have adequately defined mandates and near-term deadlines. These include the Growth Management and Regional Mobility components;and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Air Quality component as currently written should not be considered as a"mandated"or"cone"component of the RCP, and instead should be addressed in future discussions concerning the RCP's voluntary components; and BE T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Housing component as currently written should not be considered as"mandated"or"core"component of the RCP,and should instead be addressed in future discussions concerning the RCP's voluntary components; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Regional Mobility Element should remain as SCAG's highest priority: and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that regardless of the ultimate breadth of the final RCP,all assumptions as they relate to the regional forecast should be based upon market trends/best estimates of future growth,and not policy projections that are,ar ificially derived and do not reflect local/sub-regional estimates of such growth; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that with the exception of the Growth Management component and the Regional Mobility Element, all remaining RCP cotponents should be removed from the RCP at this time so that discussions among the sub-regions and local governments regarding their content and intention can occur and regional consensus can be developed on how thew RCP should or should not fit into local government decision- making and peamit review; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that funding sources for continued work on these components should be clearly identifiied,and SCAG should not in any instance utilize funds earmarked for transportation purposes for these efforts. LAW OFFICES PECEIVED PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDIMI =7RK A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS �I T Y O H.UHTINGT0.i F,':.CH,L'd.!_!F. 2603 MAIN STREET ANGELO J. PALMIERI' JOEL P. KEW EAST TOWER - SUITE 1300 FEB Z2 �7 U� ((1i�i �!���,jpX 19712 ROBERT F. WALDRON' MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO IRVIN E, CALIFORNIA 92714622f3 IRNIN E,✓LA.9 2 713-9 71 2 ALAN H.WIENER' ELINOR J.VOTAW ROBERT C. IHRKE' NORMAN J. RODICH (714) 851-9400 JAMES E. WILHELM' LORI K. DAVIES WRITERS DIRECT DENNIS G. TYLER' GARY C.WEISBERG DIAL NUMBER MICHAEL J. GREENE' MICHAEL H. LEIFER FRANK C. ROTHROCK' MICHELE D. MURPHY DENNIS W. GHAN' SCOTT R. CARPENTER 851-7268 DAVID D. PARR' RICHARD A. SALUS February 22 1994 CHARLES H. KANTER' DOUGLAS M. STEVENS Y / TELECOPIER (7I4) 851-1554 GEORGE J. WALL D. SUSAN WIENS (714) 851-3 B44 L. RICHARD RAWLS BEVERLY A. CHIN (714) 757-1225 PATRICK A. HENNESSEY RONALD M. COLE (714) 851-2351 DON FISHER CYNTHIA B. PAULSEN GREGORY N.WEILER KELLY R. KIMBROUGH WARREN A.WILLIAMS SEAN P. O'CONNOR JOHN R. LISTER SUSAN T. SAKURA BRUCE W. DANNEMEYER TIMOTHY S. GALUSHA REFER TO FILE NO. CYNTHIA M.WOLCOTT 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1 3 8 8 2-0 1 2 OF COUNSEL NON. THOMAS J. UMBERG MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY VIA MESSENGER -- RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION TO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Re: Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 Honorable Mayor and Honorable City Council Members: This firm represents Huntington Signal Oil Company ("HSOC") , the owner of Assessor's Parcel No. 159-191-01, 02, 03 and 05 and Southridge Homes ("SRH") , the owner of Assessor's Parcel No. 159- 191-04 in the City of Huntington Beach. The foregoing properties are located within the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan and the proposed boundaries of the Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 (the "District") . The City's inclusion of the HSOC and SRH properties within the District and the City's method of apportionment of the assessments to be levied against such properties will constitute an invalid exercise of the City's police power (both under common or statutory law) and will not withstand judicial scrutiny. The City has failed to establish that: (a) the HSOC and SRH properties will in fact benefit from the improvements; or (b) if such benefit exists, that the cost of the improvements has been spread among the benefitted property owners on an equitable, non-discriminatory basis. PALMIERI, TYLER,WIENER,WILHELM &WALDRON Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach February 22, 1994 Page 2 First, there is no basis for the City's allocation of the $61 million of infrastructure between Seacliff Partners and the remaining landowners within the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. The improvements to be funded by the District must benefit all properties within the District's boundaries. To be valid, an assessment must directly benefit the land upon which it is imposed. Any benefit to the HSOC and SRH properties is so tenuous as to be speculative. It is obvious that the prime and possibly only benefactor of the improvements to be paid for by the District is Seacliff Partners who own almost all the undeveloped land in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area. Second, the City has made no findings to explain the disparate allocation of the costs of different improvements between Seacliff Partners and the remaining landowners. For example, the City has concluded that the development of the Seacliff Partners' properties will create a need for 96 percent of the proposed sewer facilities but only 66. 5 percent of street widening, 76. 6 . percent of storm drain facilities and 78. 2 percent of sewer facilities. Assuming the HSOC and SRH properties will in some way benefit from the improvements, the City has failed to establish that the amount of the assessment to be levied against the HSOC and SRH properties is proportionate to the benefit to be received by the properties from the public improvements to be funded by the assessment. The City has also failed to establish the constitutionally mandated nexus between the amount of the assessment to be levied upon the HSOC and SRH properties and the burden which will be imposed by the development of the HSOC and SRH properties upon the public facilities to be funded by the assessments. By its proposed formation of the District, the City is attempting to disguise development fees as special assessments. As development fees, the City has failed to satisfy the state mandated nexus requirements of Government Code Section 66000 et seq. which requires, among other things, that the City, as a condition to imposing an exaction as a condition of approval of a development project determine that there is a reasonable relationship between (a) the use of the assessment and the type of development project upon which the assessment is levied and (b) the need for the public facilities and the type of development project for which the assessment is levied. PALMIERI, TYLER,WIENER,WILHELM &WALDRON Ms. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach February 22, 1994 Page 3 By allocating $11 million of infrastructure costs to other property owners within the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, the City has given preferential treatment to one major landowner. Such disparate treatment denies HSOC and SRH of their equal protection and substantive due process rights. The City's approval of the District will only invite costly litigation resulting in long delays in the installation of the infrastructure sought to be provided by the District's formation. We encourage the City to rethink the methodology used to allocate the assessments, adopt a fair allocation of costs which protect our client's interests and comport with the clear mandates of state and federal law. Very truly yours, CXG -f a� Cynthia M. Wolcott CMW/tb cc: Mr. Richard Kelter Mr. Steve May (Public Works Department) D:\LTR\CTYOFHUN.LET 02/22/94 RECEIVED 0TY Ci.ERK COUNCIL MEMBER: HUNTINGTilN :site►{, CALIF. EB 10 BE Pry tgq AS A RESIDENT OF DOWNTOWN INGTON EACH FOR 68 YEARS AND HAVING WORKED IN THE AREA FOR 52 YEARS I ASK YOU HOW YOU COULD POSSIBLY CONSIDER PUTTING A LIEN ON MY PROPERTY FOR $133,000 ? THIS PROPERTY I HAVE HAD FOR 25 YEARS AS MY RETIERMENT; NOW T CANT SELL IT OR BORROW MONEY ON IT AND AT MY AGE I DONT HAVE THE TIME LEFT TO REAP THESE SO CALLED BENEFITS THESE CHEVRON OIL COMPANY ATTORNEYS SAY THERE IS. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO PUT A LIEN ON YOUR PROPERTY TO BENEFIT A MULTIBILLION DOLLAR COMPANY?I HAVE TO BORROW MONEY TO PAY THE TAXES ON THIS PROPERTY NOW. THIS WHOLE FIASCO WAS CHEVRONS DOING AND NOW THEY WANT TO LIEN THEIR NEIBORS PROPERTY TO HELP THEM PAY FOR IT. I FOR ONE WOULD BE HAPPY IF IT WERE KEPT FOR OPEN SPACE. _ -�RF�SPECTFULd., �/ GOETSCH 612 LOTH STREET 536-9338 Southern California Edison Company 7333 BOLSA AVENUE A WESTMINSTER,CALIFORNIA 92683 �7 JERRY J. DOMINGUEZ TELEPHONE MANAGER,HUNTINGTON BEACH - (714)895.0271 February 17, 1994 Mr. Steve May City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: 110-015-59 , Holly Seacliff Dear Mr. May: In response to the proposed assessment against Southern California Edison, the following is presented for your consideration. Two amounts are noted: a "proposed fee" of $874.55 and on a separate notice a "lien amount" is referred to in the amount of $352,363. Both refer to cost reimbursement for public facilities and related improvements. Are these two amounts for.different.. . .._ property locations? Southern California Edison has electrical transmission and .distribution facilities within the proposed area as well as our Slater Substation on Edwards Avenue. These facilities are dedicated to public use which precludes the development of these properties for uses other than that of a public utility nature and would receive no benefit from the proposed improvements. These facilities are unattended and automated, requiring only occasional mainte- nance or patrol access. These public improvements might be of benefit to some individuals in the city ' of Huntington Beach, but would provide no direct benefit for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy. It is our position that it.would create an unfair burden on our general rate payers. In considering the Application of Assessments Spring Street Co. vs. City of Los Angeles, 170 Cal., 24, 30, the Supreme Court stated: "that the return to the property owner by way of benefit is, under our system of government, the basic foundation.upon which this right rests, becomes apparent from the consideration that if we are not able to say that the owner for the specific charges imposed is compensated by the Mr. Steve May February 17, 1994 Page 2 increased value of the property, then most manifestly we have a special tax upon a minority of the property owners, which tax is for the benefit of the public and which tax is special, unequal, and ununiform". In the absence of some direct benefit ,Southern California Edison Company respectfully requests that its properties be excluded or exempted from the "Proposed Reimbursement District 93-1." The imposition of this additional "fee" would constitute an inequitable benefit to the city of Huntington Beach at the expense of all Edison customers. Under such situations it has been recommended by our legal department that a city surcharge be considered by Edison. I appreciate your consideration of this matter and am available at your convenience to discuss this further or answer any questions. Sincerely, '13 dp Jerry Dominguez cc: Connie Brockway, City Clerk aF FED ZZ ! as Fib ¢� jV �- t FROM WDE-CIE PHONE NO. +714 5?6, G102 Feb. 22 1994 09:25AM P7 i' I liy.trYtin�? �n Be�.c,;l>. "c,�Yioxi�ow Box 865 i{untinglon beach,CA 92648 February 19 , 1993 Mayor Moulton-Patterson and Councilniernber,; City (),I- f-Iuntington Beach 2000 Main ;street; Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Dear Mayor Moulton-Patterson and Courlcilln©mbers : Huntington Beach Tomorrow has been following the development of an outdoor sales ordinance , including outdoor dining , carts r_+nd I<i.askE 'For apProxiMatoly at least. 5 rnonthe . Over thnf. time we I-avo nicated with st-aft' 'r,n(:l , snr_,1,0 i ec;enLIY wa.t1) t.he PIanr,i It-t �,'!.)irit(I1SE1Gr1 tis various versions of th.e ordinance went through t.ho evaluation process . Wo w.i,,hes to submit tho following comments for your consideration with regard to Item D-4 of the City C:ounoil/Redevelopment Agericy Meeting of the Huntington Re)ac1) City COL1110.t.] , FebrUary 22 . 1994 : N�3a_atj,va Declaration No . 9= -?..0 .rnd Code AIr:-a ndinent 95-5A both of wliich wi l l c orne before tomorrow as part of Agenda Item b-1 xn!-e there has been some question raised in this regard , we wish to ree(nPhasizr- our position that outdoor dining 1.n nppropricate rtreas iri this city , e .g . the downtown area , provides a desirable arid attractive ambience and should be encouraged , again , where it i.t is appropriate and at an &Pr.)roPriate level . We also wish to see an ordinance for out-door dining adopted at as early a time as possible so that ( I. ) there will no longer be piecemeal addition of facilities may not conform to the ordinance as later adopted , ( 2 ) so that there will be An ordorly process in place for conditioni,no and controlling this use and ( 1 ) so that there w;r II be a level playing field for all ar)r)Hcants. We Offer the fallowing comments and roquest the following ch>:;<n. e- because we believe they will strengthen the ordinance and aro in the best .interests of community as a whole . Although this part of. a general outdoor sales ordinance has been improved since the time of its first introduction , we beliave, f ur thor 1,mprovetnent mast•. st 111 be made ., if it i> t;o accompl I Vh its purf:)ose , 1 .0 . tp P Y 0 V L 81-1 0 Vd01-ly PV0C0U:R for outcluor dini.na and other outdoor- 5,Fa.l.o in t1,+3 city . We also believe that the CEQA process needs ' to be modified . MM If�A'r 1 GN K, 6 zz 931 a3Al3�3� 02- -94 i1 : 05 1A P07 FROM WDE-CJE PHONE NO. : +714 536 6102 Feb. 22 1994 09:25AM PG P-6aE, .-L nda t ion A . lo. �h. .At ygu modify the t_g jAcLludA gpJ.y 9',,3-n,,SA and rP_qL1i1'9 ft. t.a 13cc0j1)P0'1L1Y Y Qj-'dj ken it., c_qm_Q.!5� �_OJ_Q_Y�Q You tg�_n-Elan P e 9"1- a w This negative declaration applies to the whole ordinance , not gust 95-56 . We qUestion whether it conforms with the letter and intent of CF_QA and do not believe it is good practice , in any Case , to approve the negative declaration for an ordinance ( or. EirlY document ) , only part of which YOU have seen . Our . request is in accordance with our desire to have a good outdoor dining ordinance in place as soon as possible . if it is not possible to modify tho negative declaration a.8 lndicated ' we request the you postp)one Approval. Of 93-SA Until a neciative declaration particular tO 93--SA has b001-1 Pl-eSOI)tOd to Y01A ---Rocominendation B . W.Q ag.P-P-ort ILIA when Ordi.rj.ajj�:jt, been P_dP1-8sP_d &D_d, r. questat t-hi.5- fe.1p.- osd 0-i-otdulp- bp- appr y d by t- aL�A LY 5-15'. Wa nq_a,�,Pzl lbal Uiq same full r�kna r_eMLjr9.ffl.@_nt_ AP_P_Li_&d j.g indoor dining also be.. app-liad W& dp- r� see w.hy.. the sane- rociulrernents would not : e applied , if the downtown is successful as projected , both inside and outside dining areas may be fully occupied in which case the 1.)arking iR clearly needed . others are having to provide parking as required by the standards . Why should dining areas ' not. be rocluirod to conform to this standards? Further , parking not stjpplj.ed by and for those uses would then wind UP LISinn the parking Provided by others . The argurnent has been also been offered that outdoor dining will cause indoor dining areas ( and perhaps part of the outdoor dining aroa ) to be under utilized and , therefore , full parking according t10 parking standards- should not have to be provided . IN the first place ,. one can not count on underutilization and .- If it 2 C, 21 2,__9 1 : 0 5 A M P05 FROM WDE-CJE PHONE NO. +714 536 6102 Feb. 22 1994 09:24AM P5 r occurs , then inadequate parking or utilization of others ' harking mtiy impact other businesses . What haprrans then? secondly , this same argument could be used to reduce parking requirements where incloor dining alone is involved . Ea concept which 'has already been ,incurPorratod in parking standards and/or roJected in setting up r>arking requirements . M - Ttam 2 . [( See also page . 10 ( f ) and page .50 ( f )) Wry. re qu a t t h 1.,11_ eg r k i n p r e g LLmno.ct �. i e d to ©Q LA 1901- diJILUa Q11 �c n r,o p e r t,.Y,_ We are at an absolute loss to understand why no parking . at all was and would not be required for this use . In addition to the considerations and reasons ..lust given above for requiring that parking be the full, requirement according to present standards , no parking or parking different than that for use can - private pr'0pe1-i,y would give an unfair advantage to those who ware able to use public property of their outdoor dining use . - ��-Xtom 3 . (See also page .9 ( r: ) and ( d ) 2 , page . 10 item ►;3 . , page .49 ( e ) And page .50 ( d ) 1 and item 8 .1 LjQ r_ .aua. _4.. .".zo-rii;r►,g. tl�rhu�ahc�at, LhJ� ordinance be cL.umud, LD P annin13 Co►nm.issioj1._"....... We believe that ( 1 ) outdoor dining is significant impact on open space , whether it be public or private., ( 2 ) outdoor din,inca is always a significant modification ( and part ) of a use permit and as such , is , and ought to be , :the responsibility of the Planning Commi.^si on and ( 3 ) the general Public in this city ought to be noticed and have the opportunity to be involved in any use of open !ipac;e , especially the public 's open space . This sort of doc_:is.ion i.s too important to the public and aught not , therefore , not be loft to an administrative deoisi,on made when much of the public can not directly be .involved . We recognize that there will be increased time and cast in having to go to thA pl.mnni.ng Commission for approval but agree with Planning Commissioner Diddle , who expressed the opinion as one in bus ine,-ns , than, the added cost is a normal and necessary part of doing h►,si. ness when the public intorest is involved . We believe thin; i„F.. especially true when public access , Public: property and open space impacts are involvod . ----Item 7 . Wp request , therefore , that where this use may impact public sraaoe , including but not limited to public right-of-way and city owned open space , the spacing between the nearest edges of tables be six ( 6 ) feet . We believe anyone who has ever spat in an areas of adjacent tables will, find this to be a bare minimum for- use, and passage . 3 0=-22-94 ! 1 : 05AM PO FROM WDE-CIE PHONE 1,10. : +714 536 6102 Feb. 22 1994 09:24AM P4 We agree with the subcommittee for outdoor dining on private property when that dining is confined to an inset area designed for that purpose on the private pror•)e�rty and improper space does not cause thbles and chairs to oxtend out into the public access , r ighL of way and onto public property , as is likely to happon , if ss:)Ficing between table is not aderiur�te3 for ease of use by patrons . We agree that the operator will soon find that patronage iy reduced if such spacing is not adequate . Fire and handicapped regulations , etc . , if enfol"coinetnt does its .job , will take cnro of public access; . Wf) do not agree where this use is sei.)arated from the associated i-estaurant by public Property , including public sidewalk , If the tables are too closely spaced , they will invariably extend into and negatively impact public and open space , even if cordoned r,ff _ 7h,© game collsiderFati.or, tippl.i.e s- L.o use of Public st-)Face , e .g . Public, sidewalk _ We do not heli.evo this should be left up to the operator . EA G E; .e.Z. URq Lh& Ott e,.. s. d f�►_�i,. i o o f L, aL a;r_ �:� Int_hp_ cdc-C—LIM O cl��u►n�i.;t:^ d��{�T..�11L@Gt b_v_ thQ f'1�ui�.g. i 11 tj:! ."a_��_Il roi nsar ted in A mini-park is referred to in they body of the ordinance , e .g . gage 4 , item ( b ) 4 and should be defined . nN/ott{e' that it appears on F:)age AR as i.tom ( a ) 3 . „ - l:tt3ln ( a ) 9: [see also page .40 , item ( a ) 9 .1 k a Lip-awest that. Lh.Q. mkllz r kg b t--o f-:wa y be. de f i.ned, aa tha —"thQ !Rr t., f.r...ogn. th- M-_Ivate PT_ape1:_tY_ �i qn Q.m -ald.0. sue. LLtz L-2 lh,�_ P..[ o...aQj:1Y_ klu or t.I—)c_ o •_he 4� of. LbD- 1.. ��'. 2? LLft 9 ml i.V 4k.1 oil, . We do not believe "external side of the sidewalk" is clear and might be) interpreted by some as tho curbside of the sidewalk . ---Item ( b ) 2 & 3: [See also Waage .48 , item ( b ) 2 & 3 .3 W.Q r_e_qu_ t that "sidewal_k aroa 4P.�..f Ul- :M ba d�91919!4 and. "or 111 L?ublio c s erg �? em— L.e &;u cad s f_LQ :. "i?w b I i c riah,t.._of--way We do not understand the need for a limitation to the si.dowaIk ar•ea of the public right of way and , in fact believe that this ought to apply to all public•--i-ightw-of-•way and to public open space areas as well , if the public 's., interost is to be completely protected . 4 -- -_.=-94 1 0'SAN1 P0 1 FROM WDE-CJE PHONE NO. : +714 536 6102 Feb. 22 1994 09:23AM P3 t 1 r ow ( b ) 3 : [See also p8ge .40 , j, om ( b ) 3 . 1 AMC When sidewalks are crowded , as they are at times during the summor and are anticipated as being throughout the year , 8 feet is hardly room for two people , especially with packages , etc . , or a couple to puss others without bumping into one another . Such fa omall walkway also reduces the openness of an area . Anything less will lead to an undesirable congestion for pedestrians And , quito possibly , inter-ferenov with outdoor diners . ---Item ( b ) 4 : [See also pace? .49 , item ( b ) 4 .] o a. ml.rd-r test of L!5- Got in w kls open aPA.P.4. &ruts ,. H_C_ . in to the reasons given in ( b ) 3 . , free passages and the retention of a fooling of Open spaces is even more important in public open spac.c areas . This is wheat these areas are all about, in the first. place and encroachment should be reduced to the absolute minimum . ---item ( b ) 5 : [See also, page .49 , item ( b ) $ .I W t* t_a 9.4�1 Q l;lia t & pr..a.v.3aLo_n ba. ldd e f2emr.>vf, l. will restore the oven space use of the area , something whiuh is and will be an addition amenity for the pub3ic using an 6YOO . LAW AQ ---Item 7 CSee also pane .50 , item ( d ) ( 7 ) .] 4G o - Mina h lna aLgau , We believe the case has been made over and over again , not only in Hunt• i noton Beach but in all cities , for keeping alcohol off tho streets and indoors . We believe this position has broad support in this city , espoci.ra.l ly among the general public and form l i e s using downtown, „r i ghhors of establishments where alcohol is sorved and the police , who must deal with the problems generated . ---Item 8 , [see also page .50 , item ( d ) ( 8 ) .J a w.uc t e d w eR t11 e. U e ra r.mit A KanxNaid Q_L. `a s7 Ld QL At twiyA]..cult, be added Q Lhe ?im l ne aQ QQ.rttr.t j uJI hI,o J Ci.2-222 A 4 1 1 : Q5A1-4 YU 3 FROM WDE-t=JE PHONE hJO. : +714 535 5102 Feb. 22 1994 09:23HP1 P2 This will be t: je only opportunity to review the use of public space to determine if the OXi.ati,ng , continued and projected use is al;-)!-)r-ppriatte to the pulalic interest . SUN• 12 [Note that Section 12 has been left out on page .501 I...EGISLATIVE (DRAFT R(AGI �2 There Ss no Part N included in this ordinance . The following are some items noted in our- earlier communicati.olis this ordinance , which were included in earlier drafts , have not It,neii included in too ►:,r Haent draft and we beIIove Should Le inc...l. udec-L we would reciue.;L that you consider those further in Your discussion . 1. . There apparently is no limitation to the number of outdoor dining areas in a given area. , if these areas becatr,e too dense i.ta 8 given aroa , especially i.n file downtown area , t:.hOy Might nrghLivaly a-t ,fcjct the ,�tt.ract .i.vc.rrcrs of such areas anti the general ar•Qa with which they are associated . 2 . Some consideration needs to be coven to the length of time that will be involved ill use of public property without a review of the continued sui.tebzlity of this use of public property . The liC.er1se ngreoii,ent will hrAvo to include a time period over which the agreoment. 0)etel,ds . We request that the ordinances include a itime li.rn.it.ati_on hofore renewal must be considered and that the renewal, pr.oces.s wi_l.l. include the Opportunity foi• public .input kanfore the agreement is renewed or extended . 3 . No site plan is required as part: of ordinance for application for• the usa permit and no sor)aration between tables has been included in this, revised ordinance . We request that both be i no I.I_ided i.n t•.hn ordi nance and reC.1LJi.red as part of the opf::'lic.tation , si.nco 1--ho'y bear very materialiv on the suit-abil,ity of the use , particularly on public property . 4 . If outdoor dining will be located on property owned publicly and privately in common , this use should be subject to tale same recluiromc91-Its , condi.t_i_on�, and provisions as those which apply to public property . S . Privately owned. public access areas need to be dealt with to file extent tthAt this access will not impaired by this use . Thank you for taking the time to review these requests , comments ,. and renornmondat Ions . Again , wo Are sorry that they are supplied t.a you can F 1%Aoh a short term basis , but we often do not got.. the G r FROM WDE—CJE PHONE NO. : +714 536 6102 Feb. 22 1994 09:22AM P1 I f i na I information until a relative) ), sshoi-t time before a meeting . 'I haI k ''. vu f OT Y01'.r Ilt ' I I,, I�' ;); Ij p"Q Q;I boha.lf uf Cfia r, -nc of this city , I-Ice, Y R- Obert. E . Winchell -clerit , for the Board of Dli ct an cl membe)-:ti of Huntington Dopich Toinoi-row Post—It-brand lax trans millai morno 7671 :rot payed p, tv rj From Co. Phone fi Fnx 0 - Fax 0 37 L73(a 02-22-94 11 :05AM Pol ,356.l 0 RECEIYE6 CITY CLERK i.':TY OF COUNCIL MEMBER: HUNTINGTON &FACH,C.ALIF. AS A RESIDENT OF DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON-B&I� 2 5•PH FOR 68 YEARS AND HAVING WORKED IN THE AREA FOR 52 YEARS I ASK YOU HOW YOU COULD POSSIBLY CONSIDER PUTTING A LIEN ON MY PROPERTY FOR $133,000 ? THIS PROPERTY I HAVE HAD FOR 25 YEARS AS MY RETIERMENT; NOW T CANT SELL IT OR BORROW MONEY ON IT AND AT MY AGE I DONT HAVE THE TIME LEFT TO REAP THESE SO CALLED BENEFITS THESE CHEVRON OIL COMPANY ATTORNEYS SAY THERE IS. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE THE CITY COUNCIL TO PUT A LIEN ON YOUR PROPERTY TO BENEFIT A MULTIBILLION DOLLAR COMPANY?I HAVE TO BORROW MONEY TO PAY THE TAXES ON THIS PROPERTY NOW. THIS WHOLE FIASCO WAS CHEVRONS DOING AND NOW THEY WANT TO LIEN THEIR NEIBORS PROPERTY TO HELP THEM PAY FOR IT. I FOR ONE WOULD BE HAPPY IF IT WERE KEPT FOR OPEN SPACE. ��RESPEC WL ELMER GOETSCH 612 LOTH STREET 536-9338 ' •� / � jr`''�s' � 'r t � •? ,'fly' '• I' �, a h o-ruse ��1' •`w���Y � �"l;f���`,•�r' Y t' i7` f��'' � ur��•t."•..tom?''. I Yes tt ,.�,.�I� , +.; �'•I' i � .tlY �,I'- �Yy ,3�, �a 1'�, `* ,. •S 1 .(�.,�'• '� I f� +��� fly ,2�a .e � bL ' 1 1L�,�� .r uS�.c �,� �,.;L��, �I, , h � ,.y��f �•P,4r� ti.1 � �g� • wT x, mil.��'tir'X)+'�rl. ��!' - •�" - R•�---•. �..;t a� �� .ems H CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval P m Public Works Department e Director (714) 536-5431 RECEIVE D MADE A PART OF THE RECORD AT June 4, 1993 -V V7/ MEETING Mr. Bob Anderson ITEM NO.` ���-- 19082 Crystal Street OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CONNIE BROCKWAY Subj: PROPOSED COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1. AP NO'S 111-15045 AND 111-150-16 Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter is in response to your questions about the proposed imposition of development fees on the subject parcels which are already developed. Our records show that the subject property was developed in 1973 under conditionally approved Administrative Review No. '. 73-23. Apparently, at that time, street improvements were completed per City requirements and a sewer main was constructed to Gothard Street. An additional administrative review was done in-1976 for construction of 2400 square feet of industrial building (AR No.•76-97): The-property is currently being used for industrial purposes. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan designates the property as "medium density residential'. You had questioned the fairness off assessing full fees to a property that already has an ;approved use and has already paid-for = public improvements for that existing use. The proposed fees, if adopted, would not be due until the property is redeveloped to the higher intensity use allowed by current zoning. If the property is redeveloped in the future, then the you should only be required to pay for additional infrastructure necessitated by that ` higher intensity use,with credit given for the existing,permitted use. The present cost spread shown in the draft report does not account for the existing use; The cost spread will be adjusted accordingly. The effect of this will be to reduce costs for street improvements, sewer improvements and water improvements, and to eliminate costs for drainage improvements, as runoff factors for residential uses are less than those for industrial uses. In your case the ultimate street width will require reconstruction of existing street improvements which are only 15 years old. In addition, the extra right of way will betaken from your side of the street. It would seem unreasonable to ask you to bear the cost of reconstructing improvements which you have already paid for, and at the same time to ask you to dedicate 20 feet of property frontage while the property across the .street..is not required to dedicate any right of way. The costs spread will be adjusted to eliminate costs } of street improvements along the frontage of your property. L, Mr. Bob Anderson &: June 4, 1993 - `: Page 2 of 2 ' Since there will be many adjustments to the cost spreads before the proposal is submitted `•. ' T _. to the City Council, I am not able to recalculate adjustments on an individual basis: The - :. : adjusted costs reads will be available for review well in advance of submittal to the City.. . Council. Thank you for,your comments and your patience. Sincerely W - Steve W. May Principal Engineer cc: Willdan Associates �N:A _K TOTAL TOTAL '.TOTAL 'TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL- TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN , PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE fNCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAY • SW 111-140-29 $21.563 so $2.571 514,089 $1,065 $1.821 $68 . $41.176 $41.176 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. t. 561 111-140-30 $14.313 SD $2.571 $14.089 S1.065 $1.821 $56 $33.914 $33.914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. SW 111-140-31 $14.313 $0 $2.571 $14.089 $1.065 $1.821 $56 S33.914 $33.914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 563 111-140-32 $148,768 so $18.640 $102.143 $7.721 $13.199 $478 $290.948 S290.948 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 564 111-140-33 $111.994 $0 $18.537 $101.578 $7.678 $13.126 $416 $253.330 S253.330 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 565 111-140-34 $19.521 so so $8,377 $0 $2.483 $50 $30.431 M.431 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 566 111-140-35 $58.563 so $0 $25.131 so $7.449 $150 $91.293 S91.293 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 567 111-140-36 $6.350 $1.750 $692 $3.789 so $490 $22 $13.092 $11.342 WEIR.DONALD TR 568 111-140-37 $12.899 $3.500 $1,383 $7.579 $10 $479 $43 $26.183 $22,683 WEIR.DONALD TR 472 111-150-15 SW261 $32.000 $7.655 S21.569 $0 $6.393 $194 $118.072 $86.072 GOWDY.ROBERT 473 111-150-16 $50.261 $32.000 $7.655 $21.569 so $6.393 S194 $118.072 $36.072 GOWDY.ROBERT 474 111-150-17 599.942 $64.000 $15.222 $42.888 so $12.712 $387 $235._1 51 SI71.151 SCOTT.WILLIAM 475 111-150-18 $71.258 $6.180 $8.971 S25275 so $7.491 sign $119.371 $113.191 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 476 111-150-19 $47.502 $4.728 $5.795 $16.327 so 541.839 $130 $79.322 S74.594 ARLINE.ROBRECHT 47-7 111-150-20 $41.247 $4.728 $4.942 $13.643 so $4.044 $113 $68.616 $63.888 ARLINE.ROBRECHT 478 111-150-21 $33.194 $32.336 S3.616 S10.187 so $3.020 $136 $82.488 $50.152 ATKINSON.FRANK&DONNA 479 111-150-22 $15.231 $3.985 $1.600 $4.507 $0 $1.336 $44 $26.603 $22.718 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 480 111-150-23 $12.825 58,145 $1.233 $3.475 so $1.030 S41 $24.750 $18.605 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 483 111-150-26 $40.6W $10.769 $2.991 $8.426 $0 $2.498 $108 $65,426 S54,658 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 484 111-150-27 $38.149 $0 $4.287 $12.080 $0 $3.580 $96 $58.192 $58.192 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 485 111-150-28 $77.130 so $8.694 $24.495 so $7.260 $194 $117.772 S117.772 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 486 111-150-29 $42.178 so $4.993 $13.757 so $4.078 $107 $65.002 $65.002 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 487 111-150-M $45.486 $0 $5.359 $15.090 so $4.475 $lie $70.5536 $70.536 SANTIAGO.JACK TR 498 111-150-31 $38.817 $0 $4.168 $11.744 so $3.481 sw SW.306 $58.306 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 489 111-150-32 $28.149 so $4.287 $12.090 so $3,580 $79 $48.175 S48.175 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 490 1111-15C-33 $38.60 $0 $2.739 $7.718 sc $2.287 _-:Iis 55l.. :;3 $51.433 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 491 111-150-34 S17.773 $0 $1.025 S2.889 $0 $856 $37 $22.581 $22.581 KELLER.MELVIN 492 111-150-36 S30,143 V $0 $8.389 so $2.486 $68 $41.085 S41.085 BROWN.JAMES 493 111-150-37 535.597 $0 $0 $10.737 so $3.183 $82 $49.599 $49.599 KELLER.MELVIN 49.4 111-150-38 $44.198 $0 so $14.428 so $4.277 $104 $63.007 $63.007 WORTHY.ROLAND 495 111-150-39 $49,09e so $0 $16.777 so $4.973 $117 $70.982 $70.962 WEIR OIL CO 49e 111111-1511-40 $82,086 $8.725 so $18,061 $0 $5.353 $152 $92.377 $85.652 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 497 111-150-44 $53.952 $0 $0 523.1153 $0 $6.882 siss $94.122 $94.122 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 500 111-150-47 $3.750 $3.113 $0 $0 $101 $0 $11 $6.874 S3.71t1 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 449 159-191-01 $173.469 $2.793- $12.081 $41.775 so $16.638 $400 $247.153 $244.370 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 450 159-191-02 $141.8W S5.270 $10.380 535.893 SD $14-995 $342 S207.988 $202.718 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 451 159-191-03 $124.501 $11.378 $10.110 $34.958 SC $13.923 S321 S195.280 $183.903 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 452 159-191-04 $124.077 $11.795 $10.074 $34.81111 so $13.874 $= $104.077 $183.182 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 502 IS9-281-01 $22.0e9 $5.056 $2.819 $4.433 so $2.174 loo Man $31.674 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 5 $10.460 $5.134 $175 $106.729 $101.720 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 403 11%-281-M SM.293 ss.000 W668 so 604 159-281-03 $9.706 S11.504 t1.601 $2.518 so .$1.235 $44, $26.807 S15.103 HASSETT,GLORIA SW IW281--05 sksm $2.782 $10.648 $16.742 $0 $8.210 $169 $103.098 ..$100.316 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 510 169-282-11 _$150.1126 $0 $0 -$84.425 so $19,095 SM S234.032 S234.032 WILLIAMS.SCOTT 511 150.-282-12 $21.810 -so so $2.774 .$W s33.998 $33.090 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. ---4S4- 15"11-02 '10M.11211 so $105'873 sm."g $81,310 $11111.4116 S2.058 $1.2S1.078 ;'$11.251.= HUNTINGTON BEACH Co 4i 7, V& a Z.. I i;L> Seacliff Partner liECEIVED A joint venture of Pacific Coast Homes and U.M.C.Development Corp. r-�T v F P.h , T1Y HUH" iuT, February 3, 1994 FEB 48 Honorable Linda Moulton-Patterson, Mayor Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1; Holly Seacliff Area Mayor Moulton-Patterson and Council Members: Seacliff Partners, as owner of property within the boundaries of proposed Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1, supports the formation of a cost reimbursement district for the Holly Seacliff area as recommended in your staff report dated February 7, 1994. Necessity for the District The reimbursement district as proposed is consistent with and necessary to 1) implement the mitigation measures contained within Certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1 and 2) the policies contained within the City of Huntington Beach General Plan as amended by GPA 89-1 for the Holly Seacliff Master Plan Area. These adopted policies require all developers of property within the Holly Seacliff area to participate on a fair-share basis in the construction or funding of public infrastructure improvements required to serve this area (please refer to Attachment A). Additionally, the definition of required facility improvements and the requirements for the City to establish and administer a fair-share fee program for developers were further defined . in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, adopted by the City Council in April 1992 (please refer to Attachment B). In July 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3151 allowing for the creation of cost reimbursement districts as a means of implementing the General Plan and Specific Plan requirements (please refer to Attachment C). The proposed cost reimbursement district equitably distributes the costs of required new public facilities improvements to all benefitting properties within the Holly Seacliff Master Plan Area, as required by the General Plan and Specific Plan. Seacliff Partners' fair share of these costs, as determined by the City's consulting engineer, is approximately $50 million, or 82 percent of the total costs of improvements. As Seacliff Partners is financing 100 percent of the improvement costs, it is not only fair, but necessary per adopted City policies, that the City establish a means of collecting the reimbursable portion of these costs from other developers in the area, whose properties and developments will benefit greatly from the completion of these improvements by Seacliff Partners. ❑ 20 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, CA 90401 (310) 394-3379 Fax (310) 394-6872 ,'CI 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 721-9777 Fax (714) 729-1214 Exemptions for Existing Use We believe that the district as proposed provides ample exemptions for existing property owners in the area who wish to continue existing uses and operations on their properties. Under a typical assessment district for public facilities, owner payments would begin immediately and continue over a 15-20 year period. Under the proposed district, payment of the recommended fee is not due until a subdivision is approved or a development permit for substantial enlargement or change in use on the property is issued. No payment is due upon sale of a property, and fully developed properties were excluded from the district. Seacliff Partners has complied in good faith with the terms of its development agreement with the City, and is proceeding with the design and construction of significant public facilities improvements which will benefit all properties in the Holly Seacliff area. We ask that the City Council also act in good faith and approve the proposed Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 as recommended by your staff. Sincerely, William D. Holman Project Manager Attachments cc: Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator Gail Hutton, City Attorney Connie Brockway, City Clerk Louis Sandoval, Director of Public Works Melanie Fallon, Director of Community Development Steve May, Principal Engineer Robert Franklin, Associate Planner Tom Zanic Brian Shally 2. CIRCULATION ELEMENT 2.1 Arterial highways should be designed and constructed to provide a level of service "C" or better for all segments within the Holly-Seacliff area. 2.2 Intersection and signal improvements should be designed and constructed to provide a level of service "D" or better for all intersections within the Holly-Seacliff area. 2.3 Provide a phasing program to ensure that circulation improvements are provided concurrent with new development, consistent with the amended Circulation Element. Require developers to provide for improvements on a fair-share basis. 2.4 Orient commercial and industrial uses to minimize traffic conflicts with existing and future residential areas. { 2.5 Allow for the potential of a multi-mode transportation system by designation of the Southern Pacific Railroad as a Transportation Corridor. LL- 2.6 Provide for designated bikeways, on streets and within the Linear Park and equestrian trails within the Ellis-Goldenwest quarter section linking to Central Park and the Linear Park, consistent with the amended Open Space Element. 2.7 Coordinate with Orange County Transit District for bus routes and turn-outs during further planning of each sub- area. 2.8 Arterial highways shall be designed and constructed in substantial conformance with the alignments and capacities . shown on the Circulation Element exhibit and the Striping Plan/Cross_Sections to be adopted with future Specific Plans. 2.9 Goldenwest Street, shall be a major arterial with 6 lanes width and a landscaped 14 foot median where feasible. 2.10 Garfield Avenue shall be a major arterial with six lanes. The portion east of Garfield from Goldenwest to Main Street was previously designated a primary arterial. � r Holly-Seacliff GPA January 22, 1990 422/02.013 12 3. COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT 3.1 Provide a phasing plan for sewer, water and drainage system improvements to ensure that facilities are provided concurrent with new development, consistent with the amended Community Facilities Element. Identify appropriate funding/ reimbursement mechanisms at the time of Specific Plan adoption or tentative tract approval. Require developers to provide improvements on a fair-share basis. 3.2 Require participation in funding programs for construction and/or expansion of such facilities as schools and the library. 3.3 Pursue necessary agreements for the acquisition and development of the school site designated in the amended }� Land Use Element. fly 3.4 Institute conservation policies in future Specific Plans for the reduction of solid waste, water, electricity and gas use. 3.5 All future infrastructure shall be designed and constructed in substantial conformance with the alignments and capacities shown on the Community Facilities Element. 3.6 In the event of inadequate City water supplies, the developer shall provide for the fair share of water necessary to service the development. 3.7 Development shall be contingent upon the adoption of a public facilities improvement and phasing plan to ensure adequate infrastructure is installed concurrent with project development. Holly-Seacliff GPA January 22, 1990 422/02.013 15 A-tcN�tf-�T A-2 2) Blended and variable slopes shall be employed to restore a natural appearance within the framework of grading that is geologically safe. 3) There shall be a smooth transition where graded slopes meet existing grades. A transition at both the top and toe of slopes should also be provided. 4) Graded slopes shall be revegetated or landscaped per City approval. F. Public Facilities 1. Infrastructure Plan The Infrastructure Schematic Plan, Exhibits 10 and 11, identifies existing and proposed storm drain, sewer and water facility improvements to serve development within and surrounding the Specific Plan area. A specific analysis of infrastructure requirements and detailed design, construction ' and phasing plans can be found in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Technical Appendix. The Technical Appendix also includes detailed arterial street sections, right-of-way requirements, traffic control systems and phasing plan. Developers within the Specific Plan area will be responsible for the construction of public facilities improvements on a fair-share basis, as described in Section IV, Administration. a. Storm Drains Existing storm drainage facilities are maintained by the City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department. The majority of the Holly Seacliff project area will drain via improved swales or proposed underground conduits into four primary runoff outlets. The first of these primary outlets consists of drainage collected from the northwest portion of the project -draining north. This runoff is either collected in a proposed storm drain system from Edwards Street northeasterly to the Ellis Avenue crossing, or drains in an improved swale north to the Ellis Avenue crossing. The second primary runoff area consists of flows collected from the northeast and central portion of the project. The existing swales in Planning Area II will be upgraded and improved to accommodate both sewer and underground storm drain facilities. Storm drain systems will be added in Goldenwest Street from Garfield Avenue to midway between Ellis and Garfield Avenues, and in the realigned Gothard Street from Ernest Avenue to midway between Ellis and Ernest Avenues. II-6 1339D l-CUY S5-ACuFF 5iftG j� i The third primary runoff area consists of flows r collected in the most westerly and southwesterly portion of the area. All runoff from these areas drains to the south and through a detention basin at the downstream end of the Seacliff golf course. This basin has been designed to accommodate the future flows from development. The fourth drainage area consists of flows leaving the project area through the southeast portion of the site. Flows from this area will be transported off the site via an extended storm drain system in Garfield or through the developed areas of- the Pacific Ranch project. E velopers shall be responsible for the construction or nding of drainage facilities within their project d/or off-site facilities necessary to serve the velopment. If a developer is required to construct to oversize these facilities beyond their fair-share serve other projects, the developer shall enter into reimbursement agreement with the City. Storm drain system improvement requirements and design criteria may be found in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Technical Appendix. b. Sewer Facilities Existing sewer facilities for the project area are maintained by the City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department and the Sanitation District of Orange County, District Nos. 3 and 11. The City's Master Plan of Sewers indicates that four major trunk lines and one City pump station will be required to ultimately collect and convey sewerage from the project area. Generally, sewer lines 8-inches in diameter and smaller, required for interior streets and individual developments, will be the responsibility of developers on a project-by-project basis . [development. velopers shall be responsible for the construction or nding of sewer facilities within their project and/or f-site facilities necessary to serve the If a developer is required to construct to oversize these facilities beyond their fair-share serve other projects, the developer shall enter into reimbursement agreement with the City. Sewer system improvement requirements and design criteria may be found in the Holly-Seacliff Specific �� �,� II-7 1339D r Plan Technical Appendix, r C. Water Facilities The majority of the project area lies within the Reservoir Hill Assessment District, which operates as part of the City of Huntington Beach Water System. Although development throughout this district is currently minimal, main lines and transmission lines to service this entire area have been installed as part of this District. Because the existing booster station near Clay Avenue and Goldenwest Street is operating at capacity, plans have been made for the construction of a new booster pump station near Huntington Street and Garfield Avenue. To properly service the project site, some additional 12-inch water lines are required within the arterial highways. Other smaller water lines will also be necessary in local interior streets within the project to provide water service to internal lots . To mitigate project impacts on the City' s water system, a 9-million gallon reservoir, water well, booster pump and a major water transmission main will be constructed outside the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Area to provide adequate water service and storage capacity for ' the area. Developers shall be responsible for the construction or funding of water facilities within their project and/or off-site facilities necessary to serve the development. If a developer is required to construct f or to oversize these facilities beyond their fair-share to serve other projects, the developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City. Water system improvement requirements and design criteria may be found in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Technical Appendix. d. Fire and Emergency Medical/Police As mitigation of project-related impacts, a Public Safety Facility (Talbert Station) will be constructed, furnished and equipped with fire and medical apparatus . The facility will be constructed on land provided by the City outside of the Specific Plan Area. [ane police substation will also be constructed, furnished d equipped as part of the Public Safety Facility. Specific Plan requires participation by developers a fair-share funding program for these facilities . I I-8 13 3 9 D e. .Reclaimed Water The City of Huntington Beach Water Master Plan proposes the use of reclaimed water for irrigation purposes. The City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, Water Division, is currently coordinating with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) for a supply of reclaimed water to serve portions of the City. It is anticipated that the City will be served via inclusion in OCWD's proposed Green Acres Reclamation Facilities Project (GAP) . The possible use of reclaimed water for some irrigated areas should decrease the future use of potable water throughout the developed Holly- Seacliff area. Should the City implement and connect to the Green Acres system of reclaimed water, such a system can be used to irrigate major open space features only, such as landscaped medians, parkways and parks, using County-provided water. Developers shall be responsible for the construction or ' funding of reclaimed water facilities necessary to serve the development. If a developer is required to construct or to oversize these facilities beyond their fair-share to serve other projects, the developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City. 1 Reclaimed water system improvement requirements and design criteria may be found in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Technical Appendix. ' f . Parks The proposed linear park areas in Planning Areas I and ' III will be dedicated; and neighborhood parks in Planning Areas II and III will be improved as provided for in the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement. 1 Properties not included in the Development Agreement will be subject to the City Park Acquisition and Development Fee Ordinance. ' g. Library Facilities Public library facilities are provided by the City of Huntington Beach approximately one-half mile north of the Specific Plan Area. All new development is assessed for library services through the payment of a cultural enrichment fee at the issuance of building permits. II-9 1339D IV. ADMINISTRATION A. Development Phasing Plan The Holly-Seacliff study area is anticipated to be built out over a period of approximately 10 years, with a target completion date of 2001. Actual construction starts and occupancy will be dictated by market forces, the removal of oil operations and interim uses, and the requirements of individual property owners and developers. The Development Phasing Plan shown on Table 2 is a program of the relative timing of development within each of the individual planning areas . 'The Phasing Plan also provides a guideline for the construction of adequate community infrastructure within the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area. B. Public Facilities Improvement Responsibilities In order to provide for public facilities improvements necessary to serve all future development within the Holly-Seacliff area, developers -will have a fair-share responsibility for either (1) constructing the necessary improvements required as described in the Specific Plan concurrent with project development, or (2) funding such necessary improvements if constructed by other developers. The City will determine and administer the fair-share responsibility for the master public facilities improvements, including sewer, water, drainage, roads, traffic controls, fire and police capital facilities as described in the Specific Plan. If a developer provides the necessary facilities beyond his fair-share responsibility, that developer shall be reimbursed from funds collected from other developers . If a developer is required to pay fees, those fees will be based on ' the City' s fair-share responsibility determination. This determination will be based on a development's proportional use of the master public facilities improvements necessary to serve the development utilizing assessment on a dwelling unit, acreage, building square footage or front footage basis. All development projects to be served by the master public facilities improvements shall be conditioned to construct facilities or pay fees per a Holly-Seacliff Public Facilities Fee Ordinance. Such construction or payment of fees shall be based on a fair-share responsibility program as administered by the City Public Works Department. ' AM0*4r*Jr 15-Cj IV-1 1341D ORDINANCE NO. 3151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW CHAPTER 17 . 68 ENTITLED COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, in the course of the development of properties, whether through the subdivision process or through the r development or redevelopment of previously subdivided properties, it is frequently necessary or desirable to require a developer to install and dedicate for public use certain public improvements which exceed in size, capacity, number, or length that which is normally required for their subdivision or development, or which are located off-site of the development and benefit property or properties not within the subdivision or development; and It is the purpose of this ordinance to establish requirements and procedures for reimbursement to the developer and/or the City by those property owners who subsequently benefit from these improvements, to the extent of their benefit; and It is the intent of the City Council that owners of all properties benefited from the public improvement make the appropriate reimbursements to the developer and/or City; and ' It is the intent of the Council that this chapter shall be in addition to, and supplemental to, the reimbursement procedures set forth in the State Subdivision Map Act, the State Streets and Highways Code, and any other provisions of state law 6/24/92 : 133 F-2 r� PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a PUBLIC NOTICE party to or interested in the below NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of HOLLY SEACLIFF defined in tliz:; Uniform COST I` +( the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a REIMBURSEMENT Building Code, and which r effect no change in oc- DISTRICT NO.93.1 cupancy; newspaper of general circulation, printed NOTICE IS HEREBY' 2. building alterations or GIVEN that the Huntington additions for residential and published in the City of Huntington Beach City Council will use which add no residen- hold a public hearing in the tial units; Beach, County of Orange, State �f Council Chambers at the 3.fences and walls; Huntington Beach Civic 4. repair of construction 1 Center, 2000 Main Street, defects or damage due to California, and that attached Notice is a Huntington Beach, Califor- 'fire, civil unrest, flood or true and complete copy as was printed nia, on the date and at the any other destructive act Of time indicated below to re- nature which does not in- ceive and consider the crease the building area by and published in the Huntington Beach statements of all persons more than one,third the,, who wish to be heard rela- original area;or and Fountain Valley issues of said tive to the application de- 5: temporary uses ash• scribed below. specified in the City of? newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: DATETnME:Monday, Feb- Huntington Beach's Munici-j ruary 7,1994,7:00 P.M. pal Code,Article 973. REQUEST: To considers proposed boundaries of; i the establishment of a cost the district are, more par reimbursement district for f the financing .of 'certain titularly described by Don gram No. 93-1 which is on public facilities and related file in the Office of the City improvements within the :Clerk. ALL INTERESTED^! January 22,27, 1994 City, otherwise known as PERSONS are invited to at # the Holly Seacliff Cost Re- tend said hearing and ex- imbursement District No. press opinions or 'submit i 93-1. If your property is lo- written evidence for, or.i cated within the proposed against, the application as i boundaries of the 'Coast outlined above, or to sub- Reimbursement District, mit written communications I declare under penalty of perjury, that then your property may be to they City s Clerk there i r , subject to a lien to pay a are an further uastions, portion of the cost of pro- please call Steve May at'd the foregoing is true and correct. viding public, facilities (714)536-5510. which benefit your parcel Connie Brockway, of land except for the con- . ditions listed below. If City Clerk within a 20-year period Huntington Beach: Executed on January 27 gg from the date of forming City Council -_ this district,you either file a 2000 Main Street final map (subdivision, par- Huntington Beach,CATj at Costa Mesa, California. cel, consolidation, etc.) or 92648(714)536-5 22 7 1,1 apply for a building permit, ENVIRONMENTAL STA- i I the lien and accumulated interest would become due TUS: This action is not a_i and payable. i "project" subject to C E 0)j Exceptions: A provisions If Building permits for: Published Huntington 1. building alterations for Beach-Fountain Valley In-1 Pon-residential uses which1 dependent January 22, 27, y do not exceed a .third of 1994. the value of a building, as� 013sa551 Signature LIFE Isr Rr M&uPts-Eft*Nr D/s �/ _ AC tq01LV c-r SE o 9 l NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATEMME: Monday, February 7, 1994, ?:.00 p.m. REQUEST: To consider the establishment of a cost reimbursement district for the financing of certain public facilities and related improvements within the City, otherwise known as the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1. If your property is located within the proposed boundaries of the Cost Reimbursement District, then your property may be subject to a lien to pay a portion of the cost of providing public facilities which benefit your parcel of land except for the conditions listed below. If within a 20-year period from the date of forming this district, you either file a final map (subdivision, parcel, consolidation, etc.) or apply for a building permit, the lien and accumulated interest would become due and payable. Exceptions: Building permits for: 1. building alterations for non-residential uses which do not exceed a third of the value of a building, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, and which effect no change in occupancy; 2. building alterations or additions for residential use which add no residential units; 3. fences and walls; 4 repair of construction defects or damage due to fire, civil unrest, flood or any other destructive act of nature which does not increase the building area by more than one third the original area; or 5. temporary uses as specified in the City of Huntington Beach's Municipal Code, Article 973. Proposed boundaries of the district are more particularly described by Diagram No. 93-1 which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit written evidence for, or against, the application as outlined above, or to submit written communications to the City Clerk. If there are any further questions, please call Steve May at (714) 536-5510. �j Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This action is not a "project" subject to C E Q A provisions. PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DATE APPROVAL _ r SUBJECT: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 9 NUMBER OF HEARINGS ALREADY SCHEDULED: APPROVED: Ray Silvee, Assistant City Administrator NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATEMME: Monday, February 7, 1994, 7:00 p.m. REQUEST: To consider the establishment of a cost reimbursement district for the financing of certain public facilities and related improvements within the City, otherwise known as the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1. If your property is located within the proposed boundaries of the Cost Reimbursement District, then your property may be subject to a lien to pay a portion of the cost of providing public facilities which benefit your parcel of land except for the conditions listed below. If within a 20-year period from the date of forming this district, you either file a final map (subdivision, parcel, consolidation, etc.) or apply for a building permit, the lien and accumulated interest would become due and payable. Exceptions: Building permits for: 1. building alterations for non-residential uses which do not exceed a third of the value of a building, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, and which effect no change in occupancy; 2. building alterations or additions for residential use which add no residential units; 3. fences and walls; 4 repair of construction defects or damage due to fire, civil unrest, flood or any other destructive act of nature which does not increase the building area by more than one third the original area; or 5. temporary uses as specified in the City of Huntington Beach's Municipal Code, Article 973. Proposed boundaries of the district are more particularly described by Diagram No. 93-1 which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit written evidence for, or against, the application as outlined above, or to submit written communications to the City Clerk. If there are any further questions, please call Steve May at (714) 536-5510. Ag To Fob' eY �a L�D Att°rn TTOI1.,, Ci�AttOrneY Connie Brockway, City Clerk peputy Se , Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This action is not a "project" subject to C E Q A provisions. Ho" CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ES INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Steve May, Principal Engineer, Department of Public Works FROM: Connie Brockway, City Clerk L6 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO 3151 AS IT PERTAINS TO LEGAL NOTICE FOR REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 DATE: January 20, 1994 The City Clerk' s Office has faxed the above legal notice to the Huntington Beach Independent as of today when we received it from your department . To ensure that the legal notice requirements on this very important hearing have been met and will stand up to challenge, please verify with the City Attorney' s Office that the yellow highlighted portion of this notice' s wording meets the highlighted wording requirement on Page #9 of Ordinance No. 3151 and please provide the City Attorney' s approval . The code states the City Clerk shall cause the notice to be substantially in the form set out in Ordinance No. 3151 thus the wording in question is probably sufficient, however please also ask the City Attorney if it would be advisable to include the exact wording as highlighted in future notices . I am requesting that in the future any legal notice for publication prepared in the City Clerk' s name (these new type of hearings that the city has never had before and of this magnitude) be approved by the City Attorney. CB:bt CC: City Attorney CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To: Connie Brockway, City Clerk From: Steve May, Principal Engineer Date: Jan 19, 1994 /f PAI*"_ ' Subject: ADVERTISEMENT REQUEST - HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT Attached is a Notice of Public Hearing which needs to be advertised at least 10 days before the scheduled Feb 7th hearing date, per Ord 3151 Please call if you have any questions; x 5510. Cost Reimbursement District No. Your property is located within the proposed boundaries of the Cost Reimbursement District and may be subject to a lien to pay a portion of the cost of providing public facilities which benefit your parcel of land except for the conditions listed below. If within a 20-year period from the date of forming this district, you either file a final map (subdivision, parcel, consolidation, etc. ) or apply for a building permit, the lien and accumulated interest would become due and payable. sxceptions Buil ing its for: 1. building alterations for non-residential uses \,-which do not exceed a third of the value**of a f'y�oa,�a�l,�� 1 building, as defined in the Uniform`Building Code, � and which effect no change in ,occupancy; I, y - \ /sj?3 2. building alterations or additions for residential use which add no. residential units; 3 . fences and walls; 4 . repair of construction defects or damage due to fire, civil unrest, flood or. any other destructive act-of nature which does not \ ease the building Z5. area by more than one third the on ' pal area; or Temporary uses as specified in the City f Huntington Beach' s Code, Article 973 .. The proposed boundaries of the district are more particularly described by Diagram No. which is on file in the ;Office of the City clerk. All persons desiring to 6/24/92 : 133 -8- 3151 testify with respect to: the necessity of said public improvements, the cost of said public improvements, the benefited area or the amount of the costs eligible to be recovered, may appear and be heard at said hearing . (b) The City Engineer shall, at least 20 days prior to the hearing, cause a copy of the above notice to be mailed to each owner of real property within the benefited area as shown on the last equalized tax roll. Such notice shall be accompanied by a diagram of the proposed benefited area and a statement by the City Engineer describing the following: 1. A description of the public improvements and that portion considered to be in excess of the developer' s requirements . 2 . The . estimated or actual costs necessary to pay for the public improvements . 3 . The actual or estimated costs of public improvements which are proposed to be liened against the benefiting property when such property is developed or redeveloped. 4 . A diagram indicating the boundaries of the district. 17. 68. 080 Action by City Council . (a) After the public hearing the City Council may, in its sole discretion, approve a resolution establishing the cost reimbursement district and may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer to provide for the disbursements of proceeds of the cost reimbursement district. 6/24/92 : 133 -9- REQU LST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date: February 7, 1994 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator BY COUNCIL Prepared by: "Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Wor s Subject: HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes ---- ---- ----- --- ------ ems----- - " Statement of Issue, Recommended Action,Analysis,Environmental Status,Funding Source,Alternative Action,At ts: 1. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Seacliff Partners has requested that the City Council adopt a resolution-to form the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District 93-1 pursuant to provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 17.68. 2. RECOMMENDED ACTION: a. After hearing testimony on the proposed Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District 93-1, continue the public hearing to February 22, 1994; AND THEN, b. ON FEBRUARY 22, 1994, OR AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THEREAFTER,approve the attached Resolution calling for formation of the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1, with the following findings: (1) Seacliff Partners has constructed, or will construct, "supplemental improvements" as defined in Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Section 17.68.020(h); AND, (2) The properties subject to the development fee will receive a benefit, upon development, from the "supplemental improvements'; AND, (3) The "supplemental improvements" are necessary to accommodate the demand on public facilities which will be created by development of the properties subject to the development fee; AND, (4) The development fees are based upon a reasonable and equitable spread of actual or estimated costs of the "supplemental improvements" to the benefited properties. AND, (5) The "supplemental improvements" are of sufficient quantity to justify formation of the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District. / - Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 2 3. ANALYSIS: 3.1 Summary: Seacliff Partners has requested formation of The Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District. The purpose of the District would be to provide for reimbursement to Seacliff Partners for costs of "supplemental improvements", constructed by Seacliff Partners, which benefit other properties within the District boundaries. The Cost Reimbursement District would impose development fees on all potentially developable properties within the District boundaries. The proposed resolution would also provide for liens to be placed on properties within the District boundaries in the amount of the estimated construction costs of improvements required to service each parcel. Fees collected from new development within the District would be reimbursed to Seacliff Partners upon completion of public improvements and verification of actual costs. Staff is recommending approval of the Cost Reimbursement District as proposed. The Council may either approve the proposed District formation,modify the Engineer's Report and approve formation of the District, or deny approval of the proposed District. 3.2 Previous Related Actions: Following is a summary of previous related actions: a. Jan 8, 1990; City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89-1 (Res No. 6097) and adopted General Plan Amendment No. 89-1 (Res No.6098). This action established the mitigation measures for development of the Holly Seacliff area. Mitigation measures established by this document include construction of the infrastructure elements which are the subject of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District. b. Nov 5, 1990; City Council adopted Development Agreement No. 90-1 (Ord No. 3080) between Garfield Partners (now Seacliff Partners) and the City. This agreement obligated the City to "use its best efforts to the extent allowed by law to obtain for [the] Developer the maximum reimbursable costs available" (Holly Seacliff Development Agreement, Section 2.2.11(f)). C. Apr 20, 1992; City Council adopted the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (Ord No. 3128). This action established the zoning for the Holly Seacliff area. d. Jul 7, 1992; City Council adopted an ordinance for the establishment of cost reimbursement districts (Ord No. 3151). This action established procedures for formation of a cost reimbursement district. Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 3 3.3 Engineer's Report: Willdan Associates, under contract with the City,has prepared an Engineer's Report (Attachment 3) which provides the basis for the spread of costs to potentially developable properties within the proposed Cost Reimbursement District boundaries. This report also contains cost estimates for the required improvements, and detailed explanations of the methods of cost spreading. 3.4 Summary of How This District Would Function: Following are procedures that would be followed for administration of the District. These procedures are based upon requirements of Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 17.68, and the proposed resolution. 3.4.1 Administration: Upon adoption of the Cost Reimbursement District, two funds would be established for administration of the District. The Holly Seacliff Monitoring Fund would be established for revenue and disbursements related to administration of the District. The Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District Fund would be established for revenue derived from fees collected, for disbursements to Seacliff Partners, and for disbursements to the Holly Seacliff Monitoring Fund. -Seacliff Partners would make deposits, as necessary, to the Monitoring Fund to cover costs of administration until such a time that fees collected would cover administration costs: Administration of the District would be by the Department of Public Works. The Finance Director would prepare an annual financial report of the District. Existing staffing is fully tasked and is probably not sufficient to handle the additional work involved in administering the proposed District. It is likely that a significant portion of District administration would be contracted to a consultant. However, prior to contracting with a consultant to handle administration, alternatives for handling administration with existing staff would be evaluated and presented to the City Council. 3.4.2 Fee Adjustments: Fee amounts would initially be based upon the estimated costs of construction as contained in the Engineer's Report. Fees would be reviewed annually, and if necessary, adjusted based upon actual construction costs incurred, and upon the increase in estimated construction costs as calculated from the change in the Construction Cost Index as published in the Engineering News Record. Fees could be increased by as much as 10% by the City Engineer to account for variance of actual costs from estimated costs. Fee increases totaling more than 10% would require a public hearing, with notices mailed to each property owner. 3.4.3 Interest Earned on Deposits: Funds deposited in the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District Fund will earn interest which will be deposited in that account. Interest will be used to reimburse the Developer or to pay administration costs. Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 4 3.4.4 Interest on, And Depreciation of, Improvements Constructed: Interest on the cost of improvements constructed will be charged to the District and compounded annually.The rate of interest will be the annual change in the Construction Cost Index as published in the Engineering News Record. The value of improvements will also be depreciated by 2% per year, based on a straight line depreciation over the expected 50 year life of the improvements. 3.5 Purpose of Liens on Properties: Liens on effected properties are proposed to provide assurance that adopted development fees will be collected, and to provide notice to prospective property purchasers of the development fee, the existence of which might, otherwise, not be discovered through normal research. 3.6 Alternative Funding Mechanisms: Alternative funding mechanisms are summarized below. None of these mechanisms is considered feasible for funding of the subject "supplemental improvements 3.6.1 Assessment District: Assessment districts could be formed for the various elements of infrastructure by action of the City Council. Police and Fire facilities could not be included in an assessment district. Special assessments on properties within the district boundaries would be collected annually. The disadvantage of this alternative would be that property owners would have to pay annually, rather than upon development of their property. Since some of the construction has been completed, it is questionable whether or not those improvements could be included in a subsequently formed assessment district. Seacliff Partners has not requested formation of an assessment district. 3.6.2 Mello-Roos District (CFD): If the Developer wanted to form a CFD for financing purposes, then this would be a reasonable alternative. Since the Developer has not requested formation of a CFD, and will finance the improvements, the CFD option does not offer any advantages for the City or the Developer. One advantage of a CFD, in favor of other property owners,would be that the taxing structure could be designed to distribute the costs over a longer period, thus avoiding the lump sum fee which would be due upon development under the Cost Reimbursement District. A CFD could be formed upon request of two Council members and a vote of owners of 2/3 of the property within the district (Seacliff Partners owns over 2/3 of the property). The district would then have to be approved by the Council. Formation of a CFD could. be stopped by written protest of 50% of the registered voters within the district. There would be additional costs for forming a CFD beyond those costs of forming the proposed Cost Reimbursement District. Improvements already constructed must be excluded from a subsequently formed CFD. Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 5 3.6.3 Reimbursement Agreement: A reimbursement-agreement could be established to reimburse the Developer from existing fees for sewer, water, and traffic impact. Existing fees are not sufficient to fully reimburse the Developer. 3.7 Property Owners' Comments on Proposed District and Staff Responses to Comments: Two meetings were held with property owners from the proposed Cost Reimbursement District area. Comments were received at both of those meetings, and by mail from those who were not able to attend. Details of the comments received are contained in Attachment 4. Many of the comments addressed similar issues. A summary of such similar issues raised, along with staffs responses follows: a. Property Owner Comment: The specific benefit of the improvements can not be identified. Staff Response: The benefit derived from the improvements is the service provided by the improvements, .and the mitigation of environmental impacts created by development of the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan area. Development of parcels within the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan area would not be allowed without the necessary infrastructure being in place. This requirement of new development is based on mitigation measures of EIR 89-1. b. Comment: It is not fair to eliminate properties_already developed, and to spread the costs of improvements to only undeveloped or underdeveloped properties. This results in a higher cost per acre for the undeveloped properties. Response: Existing improvements are adequate to serve existing development. Improvements included in the proposed District are necessary to service additional development, as specified in EIR No. 89-1. C. Comment: The improvements have regional benefits, therefore, the costs should be spread on a regional basis. Response: Same response as (b) above. d. Comment: The property liens will devalue properties by the amount of the lien, while the increases in property values due to the improvements will not compensate for the devaluation. Response: A potential buyer or lender would likely account for the proposed lien debt by devaluing the liened property. The increases in property values due to the improvements may, or may not, compensate for the effective devaluation due to the lien. e. Comment: Seacliff Partners chose to develop first, and therefore, should be responsible for the cost of whatever improvements they are required to construct. • Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 6 Response: Property owners ,frequently benefit from improvements constructed by earlier developers without having to compensate the earlier developer. However, there is no legal right to such a benefit. f. Comment: The proposed fees are exorbitant. Response: The proposed fees are based on a realistic estimate of costs of improvements necessary to serve ultimate development of the District area. g. Comment: It is not fair to charge interest on improvements not yet needed by others. Response: Interest will be charged to the District as described in Section 3.4.4. The purpose of the interest charge and depreciation is to adjust the value of improvements constructed based on increases in construction costs and depreciation of the improvements. h. Comment: Some properties with assessments are not developable (encyclopedia lots), and therefore, should not be assessed. Response: Fees would not be due until development. If a property is not developable, then there would be no assessment. It would be possible to combine substandard lots to make them developable, or to cure other restrictions on development. In such cases the fee would be collected upon development. If such properties are not developed during the life of the District, then Seacliff Partners would bear the cost of fees spread to such properties. i. Comment: Some properties are already paying into the Reservoir Hill Assessment District, and they should not be assessed twice. Response:The Reservoir Hill Assessment District was formed to finance construction of water lines within Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street. Those improvements were necessary to provide water service to the properties within that District. Costs of those improvements are not included in the proposed Cost Reimbursement District. Fees to be charged for the proposed district are for other improvements required to service the properties within the proposed District. Some properties will be within both districts. j. Comment: Relocation and removal costs for buried oil lines should be born by the owners of those lines. Response: Relocation costs of active oil lines will, in most cases, be born by the owners of those lines. Removal costs for abandoned oil lines would be born by the owners of those lines; But, in most cases, there is no record of who owns the abandoned lines. The cost of removing abandoned lines with unknown ownership would be spread throughout the District. Request for City Council Action Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1 February 7, 1994 Page 7 4. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Formation of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District is not a"project" as defined by Cal. Gov. Code, Section 15378, and is not subject to provisions of CEQA. 5. FUNDING SOURCE: Seacliff Partners has deposited $57,800 into the Holly Seacliff Fund to cover consultant and staff costs related to initiation of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District. Upon formation of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District additional funds will be deposited by Seacliff Partners into the Holly Seacliff Monitoring Fund, as necessary, to cover costs of administering the District. If Scacliff Partners fails to maintain a positive balance in the Holly Seacliff Monitoring Fund, then the District will be abandoned pursuant to provisions of,Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 17.68. 6. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Following are alternative actions available to the Council. These alternative actions could not be taken until February 22, 1994, or at a regular meeting of the City Council thereafter. a. Modify the Engineer's Report-Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1, dated January 18, 1994, and approve the attached Resolution calling for formation of the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1, with findings; OR, b. Deny approval of the attached Resolution calling for formation of the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1. 7. ATTACHMENTS: a. Attachment 1: District Map b. Attachment 2: Resolution calling for formation of the Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1. C. Attachment 3: Engineer's Report - Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-1, dated January 18, 1994. d. Attachment 4: Property Owner Comments on The Proposed Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District. LFS:REE:SWM:swm \mxA=\rcacra.00i ACCXrT%D.%j"MAD AT THS COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT TYOFHuh7voci01TFa cTY 0/NlM,4wI+OM.iAG, DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 DATE TD¢ FEE f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BOOK FACE COUNTY OF ORANGE LEE A.BRA.`TCH STATE OF CAUFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT ELLIS AVENUE PQ HIT 3J �PQ inR i SFF itI Co G y~p I F N a� '^ I �� �1'• �--���N ERNEST AVENLE ---1 I SEE SHT. 5 I I I = c� L--L--'—-- W Q I \�, I SEE HT. 6 15`. IGARFIELD I AVENUE I D 4J O L W CLAY PEE HT.10' o � \ N P 4�fNUE Clq CLAY SL SEE SHT. II F LEGEND: N.A.P. NOT A PART BY DM'n REC.ORDFD IN THE OFFICE OF THE SUPERLVTENDEVT OF MEETS OF THE Cr Y OF HVKTLNOTON BFAOi THIS DAY OF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE C7TY CLERX OF THE CM OF HLNT.NC. 199j TON BEACH THLS DAY OF .1993. SL rERLlrrLNDEVT OF STREETS CTY CLERK OTY OF HL'KTLNG'TON BF.SOi CM OF HLti'iLNO:VN SEAOi Attachment (1) RESOLUTION NO. � 565 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING THE HOLLY-SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-01 WHEREAS, on February 7, 1994, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach held a public hearing concerning the establishment of a cost reimbursement district pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.68; and In accordance with the aforesaid provisions of law, and following notice and public hearing as required therein,the City Council desires to establish said Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-01, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District No. 93-01 is hereby established. SECTION 2. That pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 17.68.080(b), this resolution is a resolution of lien. SECTION 3. That pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 17.68.080(b), and in compliance therewith,the document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, contains the following items: a. A list of the properties identified by assessor's parcel numbers which are included within the district boundaries. (HBMC Section 17.68.080(b)(1)) b. A diagram indicating the boundaries of the district and identify the properties to be liened. (HBMC Section 17.68.080(b)(2)) C. An apportionment of the excess costs which represent the actual or estimated amount to be levied against each parcel within the district. If the costs are estimated, 1 4\s\Ho 193-01\01/21/94 Attachment (2) the liens are subject to recomputation by the City Engineer when the construction and final audit have been completed. (HBMC Section 17.68.080(b)(3)) d. The time when such liened costs are due and payable. (HBMC Section 17.68.080(b)(4)) e. A statement indicating that the liens are subject to an interest charge,the terms of which shall be defined. (HBMC Section 17.68.080(b)(5)) SECTION 4. That pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 17.68.080(d), the City Engineer shall cause a copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, located in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1994. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk fit Attorney ice- REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INIT TED AND APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Pu lic Works 2 4\s\Ho l93-01\01/21/94 Attachment (2) ENGINEER'S REPORT HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH j- EXiilr% lT 1 1, i i Prepared by: Willdan Associates 888 S. West Street, Suite 300 Anaheim, California 92802-1845 (714) 563-3200 January 18, 1994 r r HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT rNO. 93-1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i ' Linda Moulton-Patterson Mayor 1 Earle Robitaille Mayor Pro-Tem ' City Council Members Victor Leipzig Jim Silva Dave Sullivan Ralph Bauer rGrace Winchell ' City Staff Mike Uberuaga City Manager ' Connie Brockway City Clerk Louis Sandoval Director of Public Works Robert Eichblatt City Engineer 1 Professional Services Willdan Associates Cost Reimbursement Engineer Walden and Associates Design Engineer r WILLDAN ASSOCIATES By: Title: Chairman of the Board 1 r HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace A. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 I. Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 IL Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 I. Arterial Roadway Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 II. Right-of-Way Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 III. Storm Drain Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 IV. Water Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 V. Sewer Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 VI. Fire and Police Station Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 VII. Incidental Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 I. Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 II. Benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 a. Arterial Roadway Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 b. Right-of-Way Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 c. Storm Drain Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 d. Water Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 e. Sewer Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 f. Fire and Police Substation Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 g. Incidental Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Appendices Appendix A Improvement Cost Estimate and Location Detail Appendix B Right-of-Way Acquisition Table Appendix C District Diagram Appendix D Assessment Roll Appendix E Detailed Cost Spread by Parcel Appendix F City of Huntington Beach, Ordinance Number 3151 A. INTRODUCTION I. SUMMARY Seacliff Partners has requested that the City undertake formation of a Cost Reimbursement District which would allow the developer to be reimbursed by other future developers for costs associated with construction of infrastructure elements which will benefit other developments. This report, prepared by Willdan Associates at the direction of the City of Huntington Beach, identifies infrastructure costs which have been, or will be, incurred by the developer of the Holly Seacliff Development Area. The report also identifies the apportionment or spread of infrastructure costs, based on the benefit received from the improvements. II. PROCEDURE a. Engineering Report (by City) b. Community Meeting c. Public Hearings (City Council) d. Implementation and Administration (by City) III. BACKGROUND On January 8, 1990, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 89- 1 (Resolution No. 6097) and adopted General Plan Amendment No. 89-1 (Resolution No. 6098) establishing development policies and impact mitigation measures for development in the Holly Seacliff Master Plan Area. This area encompasses the Holly Seacliff and Ellis- Goldenwest specific planning areas. These areas are located in the central portion of the City of Huntington Beach, bounded generally by Central Park and Ellis Avenue on the north, Huntington and Main Streets on the east, Yorktown and Clay Avenues on the south, and the City of Huntington Beach boundary line on the west. To ensure that adequate public facilities are provided to accommodate planned development in the area, the General Plan includes policies requiring all developers to provide for facilities improvements on a fair share basis. On November 5, 1990, the City Council adopted Development Agreement No. 90-1 (Ordinance No. 3080) between Pacific Coast Homes/Garfield Partners (now Seacliff Partners) and the City. Development Agreement No. 90-1 sets forth the terms and conditions for development of 500 acres of Pacific Coast Homes' property within the Holly Seacliff project. The terms and conditions of the development agreement require Seacliff Partners to construct off-site infrastructure improvements which benefit other properties not owned by the developer. The development agreement provides that Seacliff Partners is eligible to receive reimbursement from other developers for portions of facilities constructed which benefit properties not owned by Seacliff Partners, consistent with the policies of the General Plan. 1 On April 20, 1992, the City Council adopted the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan and Technical Appendix (Ordinance No. 3128). The Specific Plan sets forth development standards and procedures and requires developer fair share funding of public facilities improvements. The Technical Appendix contains precise alignments and design criteria for public infrastructure improvements. ! On Jul 7, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3151 which establishes the Y Y P procedures and guidelines for forming Reimbursement Districts to implement the General Plan and Specific Plan policies and requirements. This report is required pursuant to the Ordinance No. 3151 and establishes the reimbursable cost for each facility constructed by developers which benefit other properties not owned by that developer. The facilities eligible for reimbursement are listed on the following pages. Seacliff Estimated Item Im rovement T Estimated Partners' Reimbursable P Type Fair Share Cost 1 Arterial Roadway Improvements $ 34,149,422 $ 28,223,257 $ 5,926,165 2 Right-of-Way Acquisition 3,555,955 2,159,583 1,396,372 3 Storm Drain Facilities 3,492,147 2,676,473 815,674 4 Water Facilities 14,424,000 10,971,902 3,452,098 5 Sewer Facilities 1,169,950 1,101,259 68,691 6 Fire and Police Substation Facilities 3,945,000 3,306,501 638,499 7 Incidental Expenses 1 100,000 79,480 20,520 TOTAL $ 60,936,474 $ 49,895,217 257$ 10,941, ]1 The remaining portion of the report provides a detailed description and cost breakdown of each facility and the method for apportioning the cost to each parcel. 2 B. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS I. ARTERIAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Arterial roadway improvements are required throughout the development area to accommodate current and future development. Below is a general description of the improvements being constructed. For a more detailed description and location of the improvements, refer to Appendix "A". 1. Construction of Garfield Avenue from Edwards Street to Seapoint Street. 2. Widening of Garfield Avenue from Edwards Street to Huntington Street. 3. Widening of Ellis Avenue from Goldenwest Street to Gothard Street. 4. Widening of Edwards Street from Ellis Avenue to Garfield Avenue. 5. Modifications to Main Street from approximately 800 feet north of Yorktown Avenue to Huntington Street. 6. Construction and widening of Gothard Street from Ellis Avenue to Main Street. 7. Widening of Goldenwest Street from Ellis Avenue to approximately 450 feet north of Yorktown Avenue. 8. Construction of Seapoint Street from Garfield Avenue to 1,300 feet south of Garfield Avenue. 9. Construction of traffic signals at the following intersections: • Garfield Avenue and Seapoint Street • Garfield Avenue and Edwards Street • Garfield Avenue and Saddleback Lane • Garfield Avenue and Gothard Street • Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street • Gothard Street and Promenade Parkway • Goldenwest Street and Ernest Avenue • Main Street and Gothard Street/Clay Avenue 10. Modifications to traffic signals at the following intersections: • Garfield Avenue and Goldenwest Street • Garfield Avenue and Main Street • Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street • Ellis Avenue and Gothard Street • Goldenwest Street and Clay Avenue r • Goldenwest Street and Yorktown Avenue 3 NOTE 1. n excavation grading, Widening and construction of street improvements includes g g, demolition, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, abandonment of oil wells within the right-of-way, relocation of existing utilities and pipelines, street lights, soil remedia- tion, median and landscaping/irrigation, installation of reclaimed water systems, erosion and traffic control, signing and striping, and any other miscellaneous appurtenant work needed for the construction of the roadway improvements. 2. Traffic signal construction and modification includes installation of opticom devices. H. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION Prior to constructing the public improvements described through this report, it will be necessary for the City to acquire certain rights-of-way. Right-of-way acquisition will include: 1) full takes for street improvements; 2)partial takes for street improvements; and 3) full takes for storm drain improvements. For a detailed description and location of the r right-of-way to be acquired refer to Appendix "B". M. STORM DRAIN FAcmrrmS Storm drain improvements are required throughout the development area to properly contain storm water runoff. The storm drain improvements consist of the installation of reinforced concrete pipe, catch basins, junction structures, headwalls, rip rap, debris basins, curb inlets, pressure manholes, and other miscellaneous appurtenant work needed for the construction of the storm drain facilities. The storm drain facilities are broken down into nine separate storm drain reaches. For a more detailed description and location of each reach, refer to Appendix "A". IV. WATER FACILITIES Additional water facilities are required throughout the Development Area to provide adequate water storage, distribution, and pressure for fire protection and domestic use. The water improvements consist of the installation of a nine million gallon water storage reservoir, booster pump station, water well, water mains, valves, fire hydrant assemblies, and any other miscellaneous appurtenant work needed for the construction of the water facilities. For a more detailed description and location of the improvements, refer to Appendix "A". V. SEWER FAciou ES Additional sewer facilities are required throughout the Development Area to provide the adequate transmission of sewage. The sewer improvements consist of the installation and/or removal of sewer mains, manholes, fittings, lift stations, and any other miscellaneous appurtenant work needed for the construction of the sewer facilities. The sewer facilities are broken down into five separate sewer reaches. For a more detailed description-and location of the reaches refer to Appendix "A". 4 M� VI. FIRE AND POLICE STATION FACILITIES Construction of the Springdale/Talbert Fire Station and Police Substation facilities are needed to provide adequate fire and police protection throughout the development area. For a more detailed description and location of the improvement area, refer to Appendix "A". VIL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES Incidental costs are the costs incurred to establish The Holly Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District. For a more detailed description of the costs, refer to Appendix "A", which includes: • Cost to prepare estimates of right of way acquisition; • Cost of the Assessment Engineer to perform fair share analysis, mapping, reports, etc.; and • Costs of public notification and report printing t .1 5 ,i C. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT I. BACKGROUND Development Agreement No. 90-1 (Ordinance No. 3080) between Pacific Coast Homes/Garfield Partners (now Seacliff Partners) and the City requires Seacliff Partners to construct public improvements which exceed the size, capacity, number, and length of that needed to support Seacliff Partners' fair share of development within the Holly Seacliff area and provides that the City shall use its best efforts to reimburse Seacliff Partners for the"non- project" share of the improvement costs. For the purpose of making an analysis of the improvement costs and determining the correct apportionment of the excess costs to the benefitting properties, the City of Huntington Beach has retained the firm of Willdan Associates as the Assessment Engineer. �. The Assessment Engineer then makes a recommendation at the public hearing on the Cost Reimbursement District. The final authority and action rests with the City Council after hearing all testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must make the final action in determining whether or not the method of apportionment has been made in proportion to the benefits received. IL BENEFIT It is necessary to identify the benefit that the works of improvement will render to the properties within the boundaries of the District. In determining the Method of Apportionment, the benefit to be considered is the benefit to land based on the highest and best allowable use of the land, in accordance with the City's General Plan and applicable specific plans and not its existing use. Benefit to the property is not realized until the property is developed. The reimbursement fees created by this reimbursement district do not become due and payable until development occurs. Public improvements generally consist of the construction and installation of arterial street, storm drain, sewer, water, fire, and police facilities, along with right-of-way acquisition and appurtenant work. The proposed improvements are permanent and are being made to mitigate the impact of current and future development within the boundaries of the District. The method of apportionment and benefit derived by the properties are described below. Those properties which lie within the boundaries of the Holly Seacliff and Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan areas classified as: 1) developed; 2) undeveloped but having development rights already granted by the City; or 3)properties owned by the City of Huntington.Beach, are generally excluded from the boundaries of this district and will not be liened for the cost of constructing the public improvements described in this report. When these properties received their development approval, the City of Huntington Beach placed improvement requirements on the property owners, thus alleviating them of future development exactions. Those properties which fall into the three categories above that are included in the dis trict boundaries are: 6 1. Developed parcels lacking frontage improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) will be liened for the costs of constructing these improvements, including right-of-way acquisition, if the improvements are being constructed by Seacliff Partners or another developer. 2. Undeveloped parcels with development rights already granted by the City, which do not have completed frontage improvements will be liened for the costs of constructing these improvements including right-of-way acquisition, if the improvements are being installed by another developer. Properties located within the boundaries of the District which are classified as undeveloped or underdeveloped will be liened for their fair share cost of the public improvements. Underdeveloped parcels are parcels which are not being used in conformance with adopted land use designations such as storage areas, make shift warehouses, or oil production uses. The classification of underdeveloped properties will be determined by the City Engineer. The following is an explanation of the Method of Apportionment for each facility. a. Arterial Roadway Improvements Seacliff Partners is responsible for constructing arterial roadway improvements throughout the Development Area. Some parcels in the District front these arterial roadways and will have their frontage improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) constructed by Seacliff Partners. Parcels located in the District which front collector I streets will not have their frontage improvements constructed or reimbursed by this district. It has been determined that the parcels fronting the arterial roadways will receive an additional benefit above and beyond those parcels fronting collector streets because the parcels fronting arterial roadways will have their frontage improvements constructed by the Developer. Therefore, the method of apportioning the arterial roadway improvements has been broken down into two steps. 1. Each parcel fronting an arterial roadway will be liened for the cost of construct- ing their frontage improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk) and a ten foot wide travel lane. This travel lane provides adequate ingress and egress to their property. The cost of constructing these improvements (including incidental costs) is estimated to be$100 per linear foot along the parcels' respective arterial frontage. The total cost for constructing the frontage improvements described in this step is$3,163,968. Improvements to collector streets are not included in this �. District. Properties fronting collector streets will be responsible for constructing their respective frontage improvements along the collector street when they develop. 2. The cost of arterial roadway improvements beyond those apportioned to frontage properties in step one above will be apportioned to all parcels within the district based on their pro rata share of vehicle trips generated per day. The number of trips generated varies depending on ultimate land use as shown in the table on the following page. Trip generation rates are proportional to the amount each parcel 7 will use and benefit from the arterial roadway improvements. The remaining arterial roadway cost can be calculated by subtracting the total cost of the frontage improvements described in Step No. 1 from the total cost of the arterial roadway improvements ($34,149,422 - $3,163,968 = $30,985,454). Below is a list of trip generation rates by land use classification that were used in the spread calculation. TRIP GENERATION LAND USE RATES' CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (TRIPS/DAY/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 33.53 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 50.73 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 53.77 RM Residential Medium Density 82.32 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 135.76 I Industrial-2 60.36' C Commercial-3 80.483 MD Mixed Development 90.16 Based on ultimate development within the District, the total number of trips generated is 32,654/day, which resulted in a cost breakdown per acre as follows: ARTERIAL LAND USE ROADWAY COST CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (COST/ACRE) ' RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 $ 31,817 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 48,138 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 51,022 RM Residential Medium Density 78,114 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 128,823 I Industrial-2 57,276 C Commercial-3 . 76,368 MD Mixed Development 85,553 b. Right-of-Way Acquisition As a condition of development, property owners are required to dedicate right-of-way which is needed for future roadway purposes. Property owners possessing right-of- way needed for the construction of arterial roadways throughout this development will be requested to dedicate their right-of-way to the City. If a property owner elects not to dedicate right-of-way, then the property will be liened in the amount of the City's cost to acquire the right-of-way. When the property is developed in the future, the property owner will be required to reimburse the developer for the acquisition costs. The cost of right-of-way is spread to those properties from which right-of-way is to I Trip generation rates were obtained from a traffic analysis performed by LSA and which were incorporated in Environmental Impact Report 89-1 (adopted January 8, 1990,Resolution No.6097). 2 Trip generation rates for industrial are based on six equivalent dwelling units per acre (6 DU x 10.06 trips/day/DU). This method is commonly used when allocating roadway costs. 3 Trip generation rates for commercial are based on eight equivalent dwelling units per acre(8 DU x 10.06 trips/day/DU). This method is commonly used when allocating roadway costs. 8 be acquired. Should a property dedicate right-of-way, that property will be credited the cost of right-of-way assessed to that property. For a detailed breakdown of right- of-way costs, refer to Appendix B. c. Storm Drain Facilities Seacliff Partners is responsible for constructing master planned storm drain facilities throughout the development area. These storm drain facilities are broken down into nine different reaches located within three different drainage areas as shown below and the diagram found in Appendix A: COST PER REACH NO. DRAINAGE AREA DRAINAGE AREA 1 A $ 79,594 2 through 8 B 3,257,908 9 C 154,655 TOTAL $ 3,492,147 *For a more detailed description and location of each reach and drainage area refer to Appendix "A". The cost of constructing each reach is spread to the parcels of land located within each reaches' respective drainage area. The cost is spread to each parcel based on its ' projected storm water runoff. Below is a list of the storm water runoff factors by land use classification that were used in the spread calculation. STORM WATER' LAND UsE RUNOFF FACTOR CLASSIFICATION DESCRIMON JEU ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 1.33 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 1.41 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 1.41 RM Residential Medium Density 1.70 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 1.70 I Industrial 1.80 C Commercial 1.80 MD Mixed Development 1.49 Based on ultimate development within the District, the total cost breakdown per acre is as follows: 1 Storm water runoff factors were calculated by Willdan Associates. These factors were based on a ten-year storm frequency. 9 Drainage Drainage Drainage Land Use Area "A" Area "B" Area "C" Classification Description ($/acre) ($/acre) ($/acre) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 1,479 9,317 N/A RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 1,568 9,878 N/A RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 N/A 9,878 N/A RM Residential Medium Density 1,890 11,909 9,727 RMH Residential Medium-High Density N/A 11,909 N/A I Industrial N/A 12,610 10,299 C Commercial N/A 12,610 N/A MD Mixed Development I N/A 1 10,438 1 8,525 d. Water Facilities Seacliff Partners is responsible for constructing water facility improvements within and outside of the development area. The facilities are needed to provide adequate water storage, distribution, and pressure for fire protection and domestic uses. The cost of these facilities is spread to each parcel based on its pro rata share of projected water consumption upon full buildout. Below is a list of the water usage factors by land use used in the spread calculation. WATER USAGE' LAND USE FACTOR CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (GPM/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 1.20 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 1.20 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 1.20 RM Residential Medium Density 2.20 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 2.70 I Industrial 3.70 C Commercial 1.30 MD Mixed Development 2.70 Based on ultimate development within the District, the total cost breakdown per acre is as follows: WATER FACILITY LAND USE COST CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION ($/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 $ 18,302 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 18,302 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 18,302 RM Residential Medium Density 33,554 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 41,180 I Industrial 56,432 C Commercial 19,828 MD Mixed Development 41,180 1 Water usage factors were obtained from Environmental g Impact Report 89-1 (adopted May 1, 1989,Resolution No.6097) 10 e. Sewer Facilities Seacliff Partners is responsible for constructing sewer facilities throughout the development area. These sewer facilities are broken down into four different reaches _ located within three different drainage areas shown below. COST PER REACH No. DRAINAGE AREA SEWERAGE AREA 1 A $ 108,042 2,4 B 1,003,081 3 C 58,827 TOTAL $ 1,169,950 *For a more detailed description and location of each reach and sewerage area, refer to Appendix "A". The cost of constructing each reach is spread to the parcels of land located within each reaches' respective sewerage area. The cost is spread to each parcel based on its pro rata share of projected sewage flow upon full buildout. Below is a list of the sewage flow factors by land use classification that were used in the spread calculation. SEWAGE FLOW' LAND USE FACTOR CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (GPD/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 767 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 1,160 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 1,229 RM Residential Medium Density 2,705 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 3,491 I Industrial 3,000 C Commercial 2,500 MD Mixed Development 2,061 Based on ultimate development within the District, the total cost breakdown per acre is as follows: Drainage Drainage Drainage Land Use Area "A" Area "B" Area "C" Classification Description ($/acre) ($/acre) ($/acre) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 961 3,237 N/A RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 1,453 N/A N/A RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 N/A 5,188 N/A RM Residential Medium Density 3,389 11,418 3,846 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 4,374 14,735 N/A I Industrial N/A N/A 4,266 C Commercial 3,132 N/A N/A ADD Mixed Development N/A N/A 2,930 1 Sewage flow factors were obtained from Environmental Impact Report 89-1 (adopted May 1, 1989,Resolution No.60 7) 11 i f. Fire and Police Substation Facilities Seacliff Partners is responsible for constructing the Springdale/Talbert Fire and Police Substation facilities. These facilities are needed to provide adequate fire and police protection services throughout the development area. The demand for fire and police services varies with concentration of people and activity. The concentration of people and activity is accurately measured by vehicle trips. Therefore, the cost of constructing these facilities is spread to all parcels based on their pro rata share of trips generated. Below is a list of the trip generation rates by land use classification that were used in the spread calculation. TRIP GENERATION LAND USE RATES CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (TRIPS/DAY/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 33.53 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 50.73 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 53.77 RM Residential Medium Density 82.32 RMH Residential Medium-High Density 135.76 I Industrial 60.36 C Commercial 80.48 MD Mixed Development 90.16 Based on ultimate development, the total number of trips generated is 32,654 trips/ day/acre, which results in a cost breakdown per acre as follows: FIRE AND POLICE LAND USE COST CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTION (COST/ACRE) RL-1 Residential Low Density-1 4,051 RL-2 Residential Low Density-2 6,129 RL-3 Residential Low Density-3 6,496 RM Residential Medium Density 9,945 _ RMH Residential Medium-High Density 16,401 I Industrial 7,292 C Commercial 9,723 MD Mixed Development 10,892 g. Incidental Costs Incidental costs incurred to establish the Holly Seacliff Reimbursement District totaled $100,000. These costs were spread to each parcel based on their total pro rata cost of the facilities. 12 i 1 i 1 r r ' APPENDIg A IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE ' AND LOCATION DETAIL A-1 1. Arterial Roadway Improvements Phase 1 S 9,724,574 Phase 2A 2,814,575 Phase 2C 3,732,847 Phase 2D 2,338,349 Phase 3A 6,256,651 Phase 3B 1,350,444 Phase 4A 2,814,784 Phase 4B 2,866,408 Phase 4C 1,390,420 ............. _ .... ._... .. ._.............._._... ...... _..._....... - _.._.... .......... Subtotal 33289,052 Right-of Way Acquisition Costs 860,370 Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs2 (see table within Appendix B) $ 3,555,955 1 Costs are based on acquiring the entire parcel. 2 Costs are based on acquiring portions of parcels which would be required upon development. A-2 C o � LE Lis ZA�F7 AVENUE .41 r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HGLLY=3EACL0FF REOMBURSENEI 0 LEGEND EWS AVENUE 2A I Q INWA70 PHASE NUMBER i CORRESPONDING TO THE � PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE INDICATES RM(T OF WAY �j --•--•— INDICATES PROJECT BOUNDARY i AVENUE � ' - I FlELD AVENUE I 1 i b(TOWN AVENUE SCALE: 1'-800' WSSOCIATES EN & cl`'`IPL M M um °s 18012 COWAN. SUITI 210• nrl/M• CA 02714 (714) 000-0110 FAL• 680-0410 STREET IMPROVEMENTS R 9 C 7 A-3 EXHIBIT 1 SECTION III: A. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR SEAPOINT STREET, GARFIELD AVENUE, EDWARDS STREET - PHASE I ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ST.RFs$2'........ .. .. ... .... .......:...:.:. -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 170,400 C.Y. S S IA CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') (SF=221,345) 6,375 TON E E AGGREGATE BASE(1.25') (SF=221,345) 17,980 TON E E 1B CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.50') (SF=363,700) 13,095 TON AGGREGATE BASE (1.50') (SF=363,700) 35,460 TON 2 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.25') (SF=9,720)_ 175 TON AGGREGATE BASE(0.33') (SF--9,720) 210 TON 3 CONST. 8" P.C.C./4" SAND WITH 6" X 6" — 6 X 6 WWM 1,415 S.F. A A 4 CONST, 8" CURB ONLY 9,985 L.F. C C 5 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 15,390 L.F. T T 6 CONST. 4" THICK P.C.C. SIDEWALK 97,010 S.F. U U 7 CONST. WHEELCHAIR RAMP 14 EA. A A 8 CONST. DRIVE APPROACH 2,005 S.F. L L 12 CONST. STREET BARRICADE 290 L.F. 13 CONST. 4" STAMPED CONCRETE (MEDIAN ISLAND) 17,700 S.F. 14 CONST. 2"X8" REDWOOD HEADER 415 L.F. 15 CONST. CHAIN LINK GATE 110 L.F. C C 41 CONST. DOUBLE LAYER SANDBAGS 50 L.F. O O 42 REMOVE EXISTING FACILITY 1 L.S. N N 42 REMOVE EXISTING OIL WELLS 4 EA. S S 43 REMOVE EXISTING REDWOOD HEADER 180 L.F. T T 44 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 249,000 S.F. R R 47 RELOCATE EXISTING 16".H.P. GAS 6,200 L.F. U U 49 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING POWER POLES 91 EA. C C 50 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 6,830 L.F. T T 51 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE OR MANHOLE TO GRADE 25 EA. I I 52 REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN 14 EA. O O 17 CONST. 18" R.C.P. 25 L.F. N N 20 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 1 EA. 23 CONST. 2' DEEP ROCK RIP RAP 20 TON 46 REMOVE EXISTING.DRAIN LINE 4 EA. 79 CONST. RAIL TOP BOX CULVERT 17 L.F. 25 CONST. 12" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 1,905 L.F. C C CONST. 12" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 65 L.F. O O (INCL. FITTINGS) S S 27 CONST. 2" METER AND WATER SERVICE(IRRIGATION) 6 EA. T T 28 CONST. AIR RELEASE VALVE 9 EA. 29 CONST. 12" R.W. VALVE 3 EA. 30 CONST. 16" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 1,755 L.F. 34 CONST. 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 5 EA. 38 ICONST. IRRIGATION CROSS—OVER 1,935 1L.F. Holly-SeACIIf do LDEN Reimbursement District A.4 ALDEN & Cost Estimate January, 1993 45 REMOVE EXISTING 12" A VATER MAIN '30 L.F. S S 48 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF 13 EA. E E 53 REMOVE&SALVAGE EXISTING WATER MAIN&FITTINGS 1,100 L.F. E E 54 RELOCATE OR REMOVE EXISTING WATER FACILITY 19 EA. 55 CONST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 6 EA. 58 CONST. 8" PUMP-OUT ASSEMBLY 1 EA. 60 CONST. 42" WATER MAIN 1,100 L.F. A A 64 CONST. 20" ACCESS MANHOLE ON 42" MAIN 3 EA. C C 65 REMOVE EXISTING 42" WATER MAIN 1,100 L.F. T T 74 CONST. CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION 2 EA. U U 75 CONST. 30' BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 EA. A A 81 CONST. 8" R.W. VALVE 5 EA. L L 82 CONST. 8" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 245 L.F. CONST. 8" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 190 L.F. (INCL. FITTINGS) 84 CONST. HOT TAP 1 EA. C C 85 CONST. 6" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 1,970 L.F. O O (INCL. FITTINGS) N N 86 CONST. 6' R.W. VALVE 7 EA. S S 95 CONST. PUMP OUT ASSEMBLY 1 EA. T T 30 CONST. 6" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN(INCL. 2,665 L.F. R R FITTINGS)(16- &20- PVC TO BE CONSTRUCTED) U U 34 CONST. 6" GATE VALVE(16" &20- TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 4 EA. C C 59 CONST. 8" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 1,305 L.F. I I (INCL. FITTINGS)(20' PVC TO BE CONSTRUCTED) O O 78 CONST. 8" GATE VALVE(20- TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 2 EA. N N -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL. CONDUIT, PULLBOXES 66 EA. &SERVICE) -= SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(GARFIELD/SEAPOINT INT.) 1 L.S. -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(GARFIELD/EDWARDS INT.) 1 L.S. -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(GARFIELD/SADDLEBACK INT.) 1 L.S. C C -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(EDWARDS/ELLIS INT.) 1 L.S. O O -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. S S -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=30,000) 1 L.S. T T -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 38,850 S.F. MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. -- POTHOLING 1 L.S. -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION PLAN CHECK FEES INSPECTION FEES ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING AND STAKING SOILS TESTING CONTINGENCY ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST - TOTAL ? ; 9:.::..:..5 p0 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District "�=ALSOC k Cost Estimate SSOCIATES January, 1993 A-5 e SECTION III: . PRELIMINARY COST ESATE FOR ELLIS AVENUE - PHASE 2A (GOLDEN WEST STREET TO GOTHARD STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. ,>:.;;;; DESCRIPTION;;;;:;::.;;;>:.;;;:.::.;>;;:<:;;;»:.>:,;:;.::,>;:.>:::;.;:;;;:.;;;::.»;:;;;:.:>: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 6,400 C.Y. $10.00 $64,000.00 -- IMPORT 54,300 C.Y. $15:00 $914,500.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') (SF--94,800) 2,730 TON $40.00 $109,200.00 AGGREGATE BASE(0.83') (SF--94,800) 5,110 TON $15.00 $76,650.00 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 2,490 L.F. $12.00 $29,880.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK P.C.C. SIDEWALK 19,920 S.F. $2.75 $54,780.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING FACILITY 1 L.S. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 6 SAWCUT&REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 32,000 S.F. $0.50 $16,000.00 8 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 1,320 L.F. $8.00 $10,560.00 9 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE OR MANHOLE TO GRADE 1 EA. $300.00 $300.00 10 REMOVE&SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN 3 EA. $100.00 $300.00 12 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING TREE 3 EA. $300.00 $900.00 18 CONST. DRIVEWAY APPROACH 330 S.F. $5.00 $1,650.00 19 CONST. SERVICE ROAD-A.C. PAVEMENT (SF=600) 11 TON $40.00 $440.00 AGGREGATE BASE (SF=600) 13 TON $15.00 $195.00 34 TIE OFF AND REPLACE MONUMENT "IN KIND" 1 EA. $600.00 $600.00 22 CONST, 8" P.V.C. RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 1,840 L.F. $35.00 $64,400.00 24 CONST. 8" R.W. VALVE 3 EA. $1,000.00 $3,000.00 26 CONST. AIR VACUUM RELEASE VALVE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 27 CONST, 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 3 EA. $2,000.00 $6,000.00 33 CONST. 3/4" WATER METER WITH 1" SERVICE 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 -- POWER POLE RELOCATION&UNDERGROUNDING 1 L.S. $500,000.00 $500,000.00 -- GAS MAIN RELOCATION 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL. CONDUIT, PULLBOXES& 11 EA. $3,500.00 $38,500.00 SERVICE) -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $3,000.00 $3,000.00 -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=4,100) 1 L.S. $75,000.00 $75,000.00 -- EROSION CONTROL I L.S. $7,000.00 $7,000.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $7,000.00 $7,000.00 -- POTHOLING 3 EA. $14,000.00 $42,000.00 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. 1 $0.00 $0.00 CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION (2%) $39,037.10 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $3,903.71 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $156,148.40 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $195,195.50 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $195,185.50 SOILS TESTING (4%) $78,074.20 CONTINGENCY (10%) $195,185.50 TOTAL Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District y jALDEN & Cost Estimate A-6 SSOCIATES January, 1993 SECTION III: C. PRELIMINARY COST ESTMATE FOR GOLDEN WEST STREET - PHASE 2C (BETWEEN GARFIELD AVENUE AND ELLIS AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST S3REBT ;... :. ..::::: :. -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 5,900 C.Y. $10.00 $59,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(1.15') (SF=138,000) 11,430 TON $40.00 $457,200.00 IA CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.33') (SF=2,525) 60 TON $40.00 $2,400.00 2 HEATER REMIX&A.C. OVERLAY (0.15') (SF=102,540) 1,110 TON $40.00 $44,400.00 2A CONST. VARIABLE THICK A.C. (SF=2,940) 30 TON $40.00 $1,200.00 OVERLAY (0.15') 2B CONST. A.C. OVERLAY (0.15' MIN) (SF=4,800) 50 TON $40.00 $2,000.00 2C EDGE GRIND 165 L.F. $0.50 $82.50 3 CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 4,860 L.F. $12.00 $58,320.00 4 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 5,370 L.F. $12.00 $64,440.00 5 CONST. CROSS GUTTER 1,265 S.F. $4.50 $5,692.50 6 CONST. SIDEWALK 3,840 S.F. $2.75 $10,560.00 7 CONST. WHEEL CHAIR RAMP 8 EA. $350.00, $2,800.00 10 CONST. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY 280 S.F. $5.00 $1,400.00 11 CONST. P.C.C. BUS PAD 4,650 S.F. $4.50 $20,925.00 20 CONST. 8".A.C. DIKE 30 L.F. $6.00 $190.00 23 CONST. MEDIAN ISLAND PAVEMENT(STAMPED 5,200 S.F. $5.00 $26,000.00 CONCRETE) 1 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 7,285 S.F. $0.50 $3,642.50 1 1 REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND/OR CURB&GUTTER 825 L.F. $6.00 $4,950.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK 5,400 S.F. $1.50 $8,100.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING CROSS GUTTER 620 S.F. $2.50 $1,550.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING GUARD RAIL 625 L.F. $25.00 $15,625.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING FENCE 125 L.F. $5.00 $625.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING STEEL PIPES 18 EA. $7.00 $126.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN 5 EA. $50.00 $250.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING R.C.P. DRAIN 95 L.F. $15.00 $1,425.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING WATER METER 2 EA. $200.00 $400.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PIPELINE MARKER 2 EA. $50.00 $100.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PIPE CHASE 1 L.S. $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING STEEL POST 34 EA. $75.00 $2,550.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD FENCE 20 L.F. $4.00 $80.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PULL BOX 2 EA. $150.00 $300.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 EA. $1,000.00:. $1,000.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING CORNERS BOX 1 EA. $450.00� $450:00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 390 L.F. $9.00 $3,120.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER 7 EA. $250.00 $1,750.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOX 3 EA. $100.00 $300.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000,00 Holby acliff Reimbursement District A%&2ALDEN & Cost Estimate WWSSOCIATES January, 1993 A-7 ' 2 RELOCATE EXISTING A AC VALVE(AV) 6 EA. $1,000.00 $6,000.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX 2 EA. $500.00 $1,000.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING WATER METER TO GRADE 3 EA. $100.00 $300.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE TO GRADE 41 EA. $250.00 $10,250.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE 7 EA. $350.00 $2,450.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING PULLBOX TO GRADE 5 EA. $100.00 $500.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING FENCE TO GRADE 200 L.F. $6.00 $1,200.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING GAS METER TO GRADE 2 EA. $100.00 $200.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING BENCH MARK TO GRADE 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE TO GRADE 3 EA. $350.00 $1,050.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING MONUMENT WELL TO GRADE 1 EA. $250.00 $250.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING CATHODIC PROTECTION CAN TO 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 GRADE 3 ADJUST EXISTING VAULT TO GRADE 1 EA. $700.00 $700.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING PIPELINE MARKER 9 EA. $300.00 $2,700.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING OIL WELL 3 EA. $30,000.00 $90,000.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT 4 EA. $1,000.00 $4,000.60 4 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN 1 EA. $50.00 $50.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING OIL METER 1 EA. $500.00 $500.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING HOSE BIB 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS 1 L.S. $50,000.00 $50,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 177 L.F. $8.00 $1,416.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING OIL TANK 1 EA. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING BLDG. &RELOCATE IMPROVEMENTS 1 L.S. $20,000.00 $20,000.00 ' 5 RELOCATE EXISTING ANODE 1 EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT 3 EA. $1,500.00 $4,500.00 6 ADJUST EXISTING PETROLEUM VALVE 3 EA. $250.00 $750.00 ' 6 ADJUST EXISTING PIPELINE MARKER 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 8 RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT, CONNECT TO 3 EA. $2,500.00 $7,500.00 EXISTING MAIN AND ABANDON EXISTING i CONNECTOR PIPE -- CONST. 12" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN(INCL. 2,640 L.F. $50.00 $132,000.00 FITTINGS)(20" &24 PVC TO BE CONSTRUCTED) -- CONST. 12" RW GATE VALVE 2 EA. $1,200.00 $2,400.00 -- CONST. MODIFIED BLOW OFF 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 -- REMOVE PLUG OR BLOW OFF AND JOIN EXISTING 3 EA. $100.00 $300.00 -- POWER UNDERGROUNDING 1 L.S. $264,000.00 $264,000.00 -- GAS MAIN RELOCATION(REFUNDABLE) 1 L.S. $15,500.00 $15,500.00 -- GAS TRANSMISSION MAIN RELOCATION 1 L.S. $120,000.00 $120,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL CONDUIT, PULLBOXES&SERVICE) 30 EA. $3,500.00 $105,000.00 -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION(GARFIELD 1 L.S. $110,000.00 $110,000.00 INTERSECTION) -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION(ELLIS INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $110,000.00 $110,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $27,300:00 $27,300.00 -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=4,700) 1 L.S. $90,000.00 $90,000.00 -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 21,550 S.F. $2.00 $43,100.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,300.00 $10,300.00 1 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,300.00 $10,300.00 -- POTHOLING 1 5 EA. $14,000.00 $70,000.00 HollySeacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN & Cost Estimate ASSOCIATES January, 1993 A8 ' -- FAIR COMPENSATION L.S. $450,000.00 $450,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST $ 8;8654:50; MOBILIZATION (2%) $51,773.19 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $5,177.32 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $207,092.76 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $258,965.95 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $258,965.95 SOILS TESTING (4%) $103,546.38 CONTINGENCY (10%) $259,865.95 TOTAL [ 732470 1 1 1 Holly&aclitf Reimbursement District At"ALDEN a� Cost EStlmate SSOCIATES January, 1993 A-9 SECTION III: D. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR GOLDEN WEST STREET - PHASE 2D (BETWEEN YORKTOWN AVENUE AND GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. ;DESCRIPTION> <,:.::::;::.;;;;;:.;;;;;;;;;;>::.;::;:;:«<.;; QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST :.. ..................... .. -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 3,200 C.Y. $10.00 $32,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(1.10') (SF=77,905) 6,170 TON $40.00 $246,800.00 2 HEATER REMIX&A.C. OVERLAY(0.15- MI (SF=149,420) 1,615 TON $40.00 $64,600.00 2C EDGE GRIND 1,840 L.F. $0.50 $920.00 3 CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 2,270 L.F. $12.00 $27,240.00 4 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 3,075 L.F. $12.00 $36,900.00 6 CONST. SIDEWALK 24,555 S.F. $2.75 $67,526.25 ' 7 CONST. WHEEL CHAIR RAMP 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 10 CONST. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY 1,655 S.F. $5.00 $8,275.00 11 CONST. P.C.C. BUS PAD 4,840 S.F. $4.50 $21,780.00 12 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 1 EA. $3,500.00 $3,500.00 19 CONST. RETAINING WALL 700 L.F. $40.00 $28,000.00 20 CONST. 8" A.C. DIKE 105 L.F. $6.00 $630.00 ' 21 REPLACE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOPS 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 23 CONST. MEDIAN ISLAND PAVEMENT(STAMPED 4,470 S.F. $5.00 $22,350.00 CONCRETE) 1 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 19,540 S.F. $0.50 $9,770.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND/OR CURB&GUTTER 815 L.F. $6.00 $4,990.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING SIGN 7 EA. $50.00 $350.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PIPELINE MARKER 8 EA. $50.00 $400.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PULL BOX 1 EA. $150.00 $150.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING V-DITCH 140 L.F. $2.50 $350.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING JUNCTION STRUCTURE 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. DIKE 300 L.F. $3.00 $900.00 1 REMOVE EXISTING PIPE&CABLE FENCE 140 L.F. $3.00 $420.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 515 L.F. $8.00 $4,120.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING METER 1 EA. $500.00 $500.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 2 EA. $100.00 $200.00 2 RELOCATE EXISTING AIR VAC VALVE (AV) 5 EA. $1,000.00 $5,000.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE TO GRADE 27 EA. $250.00 $6,750.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING PULLBOX TO GRADE 5 EA. $100.00 $500.00 ' 3 ADJUST EXISTING FENCE TO GRADE 965 L.F. $6.00 $5,790.00 3 ADJUST EXISTING WATER MANHOLE TO GRADE 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 ' 4 REMOVE EXISTING OIL WELL 1 EA. $30,000.00 $30,000.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD VAULT 1 EA. $500.00 $500.00 4 REMOVE EXISTING TANK 4 EA. $1,250.00 $5,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING PULL BOX 3 EA. $250.00 $750.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 2 EA. $100.00 $200.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING BARRICADE 1 70 L.F. 1 $12.00 $840.00 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District b=ALDEN & Cost Estimate WWSSOCIATES January, 1993 A-10 4 REMOVE EXISTING SHED EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING OIL WELL i EA. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT(LP) 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING PIPE 140 L.F. $500.00 $70,000.00 5 RELOCATE EXISTING STD. OIL CO. BOX 1 EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 -- CONST. 14" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 650 L.F. $55.00 $35,750.00 -- CONST. 14" BUTTERFLY VALVE 6 EA. $1,600.00 $9,600.00 -- CONST. 2" VAC&AIR RELEASE VALVE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 -- CONST. 4" PUMP OUT ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 -- CONST. CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 -- POWER POLE RELOCATION&UNDERGROUNDING. 1 L.S. $252,000.00 $252,000.00 -- GAS MAIN RELOCATION(REFUNDABLE) 1 L.S. $6,500.00 $6,500.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL CONDUIT, PULLBOXES&SERVICE) 18 EA. $3,500.00 $63,000.00 -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION(YORKTOWN 1 L.S. $90,000.00 $90,000.00 ' INTERSECTION) -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION(CLAY INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $90,000.00 $90,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $25,700.00 $25,700.00 -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=1,800) 1 L.S. $50,000.00 $50,000.00 -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 19,400 S.F. $2.00 $38,800.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) ' -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $9,800.00 $9,800.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $9,800.00 $9,900.00 -- POTHOLING 2 EA. $14,000.00 $28,000.00 ' -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. 1 $177,000.00 $177,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST a' 1x2I6tI15' MOBILIZATION (2%) $32,432.03 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $3,243.20 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $129,729.10 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $162,160.13 ' ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $162,160.13 SOILS TESTING (4%) $64,864.05 CONTINGENCY (10%) $162,160.13 ' TOTAL 338mo 1 1 1 ' H0Uy-Seacllf A Reimbursement District At" doSSOCIATES Cost Estimate January, 1993 A_11 SECTION III: E. PRELIIVIINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR GOTHARD STREET - PHASE 3A (BETWEEN GARFIELD AVENUE AND ELLIS AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. :DESCRIPTION:;.:>;;;;;;:.;:.;;;::,;>;;>:.;:.>;:>:.;;;:::;;>;:.::;; ::::;; QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST . ...::. . . .. .,.:..::.:.:....:. ...: -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 36,000 C.Y. $10.00 $360,000.00 -- IMPORT 95,700 C.Y. $15.00 $1,435,500.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.45') (SF=175,245) 5,680 TON $40.00 $227,200.00 AGGREGATE BASE(1.95') (SF=175,245) 22,215 TON $15.00 $333,225.00 ' 1A CONST. VARIABLE THICK A.C. (SF=23,150) 750 TON $40.00 $30,000.00 OVERLAY (0.45') 1B CONST. 1' WIDE FULL DEPTH A.C. LIFT (SF=245) 7 TON $40.00 $280.00 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 5,735 L.F. $12.00 $68,820.00 2A CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 2,250 L.F. $12.00 $27,000.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK P.C.C. SIDEWALK 29,000 S.F. $2.75 $79,750.00 4 REMOVE OR RELOCATE EXIST. FACILITY 1 L.S. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND/OR GUTTER 425 L.F. $6.00 $2,550.00 6 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 28,190 S.F. $0.50 $14,095.00 ' 8 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 1,260 L.F. $8.00 $10,080.00 9 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE OR MANHOLE TO GRADE 11 EA. $300.00 $3,300.00 10 REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN 5 EA. $100.00 $500.00 12 REMOVE EXISTING TREE 4 EA. $200.00 $800.00 13 CONST. DRIVE APPROACH 2,920 S.F. $5.00 $14,600.00 14 CONST. HANDICAP RAMP 10 EA. $350.00 $3,500.00 15 CONST.STREET BARRICADE 280 L.F. $12.00 $3,360.00 16 CONST. DOUBLE LAYER SAND BAGS 280 L.F. $2.00 $560.00 17 CONST. 2" X 8" REDWOOD HEADER 280 L.F. $3.00 $840.00 52 CONST, 4" STAMPED CONCRETE (MEDIAN ISLAND) 1,100 S.F. $5.00 $5,500.00 69 CONST. PARKWAY CULVERT 23 L.F. $100.00 $2,300.00 71 CONST. 3' WIDE GUNITE V-DITCH 650 L.F. $9.00 $5,950.00 72 CONST. F WIDE GUNITE V-DITCH 990 L.F. $5.00 $4,900.00 74 RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOX 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 75 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE APPROACH 300 S.F. $2.50 $750.00 ' 76 REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK 940 S.F. $1.50 $1,410.00 78 TIE OFF&REPLACE MONUMENT "IN KIND" 1 EA. $600.00 $600.00 82 CONST. 2' HIGH CONC. SPLASH WALL 15 L.F. $10.00 $150.00 18 CONST, 8" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 3,020 L.F. $35.00 $105,700.00 ' 24 CONST. 12" R.W. VALVE 1 EA. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 25 CONST. 8" R.W. VALVE 9 EA. $1,000.00 $9,000.00 26 CONST. 2" LANDSCAPE METER&SERVICE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ' 29 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 5 EA. $2,000.00 $10,000.00 70 CONST. IRRIGATION CROSS-OVER 560 L.F. $10.00 $5,600.00 77 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER 3 EA. $250.00 $750.00 79 ABANDON&SALVAGE EXIST. WATER METER& 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 BACKFLOW PREVENTER ' Holly-SeacliR Reimbursement District 4%&2 ALDEN & Cost Estimate nSSOCIATES ' January, 1993 A-12 -- TELEPHONE RELOCATIC L.S. $360,000.00 $360,000.00 -- POWER UNDERGROUNDING i L.S. $216,000.00 $216,000.00 -- NEW EDISON AND TELEPHONE BACKBONE 1 L.S. $90,000.00 $90,000.00 ' -- GAS MAIN(NEW-REFUNDABLE) 1 L.S. $23,000.00 $23,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL CONDUIT, PULLBOXES&SERVICE) 21 EA. $3,500.00 $73,500.00 -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(GARFIELD INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $130,000.00 $130,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION(ELLIS INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $110,000.00 $110,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(SPINE ROAD INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $130,000.00 $130,000.00 ' -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $27,000.00 $27,000.00 -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=23,000) 1 L.S. $300,000.00 $300,000.00 - INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 11,500 S.F. $2.00 $23,000.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,300.00 $10,300.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,300.00 $10,300.00 ' -- POTHOLING 4 EA. $14,000.00 $56,000.00 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. $0.00 $0.00 .................................. CONSTRUCTION COST ....$4'338TQ'OQ ' MOBILIZATION (2%) $86,777.40 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $8,677.74 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $347,109.60 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $433,887.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $433,887.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $173,554.80 CONTINGENCY (10%) $433,987.00 TOTAL €['$tS 'S6GOS4 ' Holly�Seacliff Reimbursement District 4%&=ALDEN & Cost F4timate WIMSSOCIATES January, 1993 A-13 ' SECTION III: F. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ' FOR GOTHARD STREET - PHASE 3B (BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. ;:.; ;::;:.,DESCRIPTION ::;:.;:;:.;::;;:.;;:.;:.;:;.;;;;;:;.;::.;:;.;;::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:<.::.;;:.:.;:.;:;.;:;.;:.;:.:;.>:.;:.: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST >ST'RE <>::>:>::>::>::>:::> -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 3,200 C.Y. $10.00 $32,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') (SF=77,420) 2,230 TON $40.00 $99,200.00 AGGREGATE BASE(0.83') (SF=77,420) 4,180 TON $15.00 $62,700.00 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 2,420 L.F. $12.00 $29,040.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK P.C.C. SIDEWALK 14,520 S.F. $2.75 $39,930.00 4 CONST. DRIVEWAY APPROACH 3,140 S.F. $3.00 $9,420.00 19 ADJUST EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE TO GRADE 3 EA. $350.00 $1,050.00 ' 20 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE CAN TO GRADE 3 EA. $250.00 $750.00 21 ADJUST EXISTING OIL VALVE TO GRADE 1 EA. $250.00 $250.00 22 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE TO GRADE 1 EA. $250.00 $250.00 ' 23 ADJUST EXISTING IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE TO 2 EA. $250.06 $500.00 GRADE 24 SAWCUT&REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 20,755 S.F. $0.50 $10,377.50 ' 25 SAWCUT&REMOVE EXISTING CURB&GUTTER 510 L.F. $6.00 $3,060.00 26 SAWCUT&REMOVE EXIST. SIDEWALK OR CONCRETE 4,625 S.F. $2.00 $9,250.00 PAVEMENT . ' 27 REMOVE EXISTING TREE 13 EA. $200.00 $2,600.00 28 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 10 EA. $100.00 $1,000.00 30 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING WALL 465 L.F. $10.00 $4,650.00 31 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING FENCE 1,475 L.F. $5.00 $7,375.00 ' 32 RELOCATE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT INCL. APPURTENANC 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 33 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER BEHIND CURB 4 EA. $250.00 $1,000.00 ' 34 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING WATER VALVE 1 EA. $800.00 $900.00 35 REMOVE&/OR RELOCATE EXIST. BACKFLOW 2 EA. $1,000.00 $2,000.00 PREVENTER DEVICE 1 36 REMOVE EXISTING STEEL POST 5 EA. $75.00 $375.00 37 REMOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT 5 EA. $500.00 $2,500.00 38 REMOVE EXISTING 1' PLANTER WALL 110 L.F. $3.00 $330.00 40 REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN(1' STEEL PIPE) 40 L.F. $10.00 $400.00 ' 41 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING TEMPORARY 1 L.S. $25,000.00 $25,000.00 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES AND ALL ASSOCIATED ' EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED 42 REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MAILBOX 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 10 REMOVE PLUG 1 EA. $50.00 $50.00 ' 11 CONST. 8" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN(INCL. 590 L.F. $35.00 $20;650.00 FITTINGS) 13 CONST. 8" R.W. VALVE 2 EA. $1,000.00 $2,000.00 -- TELEPHONE RELOCATION 1 L.S. $125,000.00 $125,000.00 ' -- POWER UNDERGROUNDING 1 L.S. $280,000.00 $280,000.00 -- GAS MAIN(NEW-REFUNDABLE) 1 IL.S. 1 $6,700.001 $6,700.00 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District '%&jALDEN & Cost Estimate W ASSOCIATES January, 1993 A-14 ' -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL CO. IT, PULLBOXES&SERVICE) EA. $3,500.00 $29,000.00 -- SIGNING AND STRIPING . L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $12,000.00 $12,000.00 ' — SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=2,750) 1 L.S. $50,000.00 $50,000.00 -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $4,600.00 $4,600.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $4,600.00 $4,600.00 -- POTHOLING 1 EA. $14,000.00 $14,000.00 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. $45,000.00 $45,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST [>`:t93SQ#'.►4i MOBILIZATION (2%) $18,730.15 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $1,973.02 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $74,920.60 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $93,650.75 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $93,650.75 SOILS TESTING (4%) $37,460.30 ' CONTINGENCY 00%) $93,650.75 TOTAL 5D ' HollySeacliff Reimbursement District A%"ALDEN k Cost FStlmate nSSOCIATES January, 1993 q 15 SECTION III: G. PRELIMINARY COST �TE C S ES FOR GARFIELD AVENUE - PHASE 4A (BETWEEN GOLDEN WEST STREET AND GOTHARD STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. _.::.;>;:.;:.;::;.;;;DESCRIPTION;::::;:.;;:>;;;;;;;:;;;:.;;;;::>;:.;:;,;:.;;»>;;:.;;;;;::.;::;:::._;;;;:.;;;<::;;:.>:< QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST .::::::;::.:.......... .... ...... -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 7,900 C.Y. $10.00 $79,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') 4,900 TON $40.00 $196,000.00 AGGREGATE BASE(0.83') 8,850 TON $15.00 $132,750.00 IA CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT OVERLAY (0.08') (SF=7,000) 40 TON $40.00 $1,600.00 ' 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 2,900 L.F. $12.00 $33,600.00 2A CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 1,110 L.F. $12.00 $13,320.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK P.C.C. SIDEWALK 22,400 S.F. $2.75 $61,600.00 ' 13 CONST. DRIVE APPROACH 750 S.F. $5.00 $3,750.00 14 CONST. HANDICAP RAMP 8 EA. $350.00 $2,800.00 28 CONST. REDWOOD HEADER 220 L.F. $1.00 $220.00 ' 36 CONST. 4" STAMPED CONCRETE(MEDIAN ISLAND) 1,340 S.F. $5.00 $6,700.00 4 REMOVE OR MODIFY EXISTING FACILITY OR BUILDING 1 L.S. $21,000.00 $21,000.00 4 REMOVE OIL WELLS 3 EA. $30,000.00 $90,000.00 ' 4 REMOVE TANKS 4 EA. $5,000.00 $20,000.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING CURB&GUTTER 60 L.F. $6.00 $360.00 6 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 99,000 S.F. $0.50 $44,500.00 8 REMOVE EXISTING BLOCK WALL 70 L.F. $30.00 $2,100.00 8 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE 1,900 L.F. $5.00 $9,000.00 9 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE OR MANHOLE TO GRADE 22 EA. $300.00 $6,600.00 ' 12 REMOVE OR RELOCATE EXISTING TREE 8 EA. $300.00 $2,400.00 11 RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 EA. $500.00 $500.00 16 CONST. 12" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 1,770 L.F. $50.00 $88,500.00 ' (INCL. FITTINGS)(20" PVC TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 18 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 19 CONST. TEMPORARY WATER PLUG 1 EA. $150.00 $150.00 37 CONST, 12" GATE VALVE(20" TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 1 EA. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 ' 38 CONST. 2" LANDSCAPE METER&SERVICE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 39 CONST. IRRIGATION CROSS-OVER 120 L.F. $10.00 $1,200.00 41 REMOVE PLUG AND JOIN EXISTING RECLAIMED WATER I EA. $50.00 $50.00 ' -- POWER POLE RELOCATION AND UNDERGROUNDING 1 L.S. $388,000.00 $388,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS (INCL. CONDUIT, PULLBOXES AND 13 EA. $3,500.00 $45,500.00 SERVICE) ' -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $3,000.00 $3,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $15,000.00 $15,000.00 -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=7,000) I L.S. $125,000.00 $125,000.00 ' -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 1,600 S.F. $2.00 $3,200.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $5,700.00 •$5,700.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $5,700.00 $5,700.00 -- POTHOLING I 4 EA. 1 $14,000.00 1 $56,000.00 ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District "W jALDEN & Cost Estimate V=ASSOCIATES January, 1993 A-16 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1L.S. 1 $480,000.00 $480,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST >552t3E0ia10 MOBILIZATION (2%) $39,040.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $3,904.00 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $156,160.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $195,200.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $195,200.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $78,080.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) 1 $195,200.00 ' TOTAL $2$178aIQ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District '%&=ALDEN k Cost Estimate W=`SSocIATES ' January, 1993 A-17 SECTION 1111: H. PRELIMINARY COST ESTMATE ' FOR GARFIELD AVENUE - PHASE 4B (BETWEEN GOTHARD STREET AND HUNTINGTON STREET) (MAIN STREET BETWEEN GARFIELD AVENUE AND HUNTINGTON STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ......:.......... :...::. .. . .. ..:: -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 8,000 C.Y. $10.00 $80,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') (SF=227,850) 6,565 TON $40.00 $262,600.00 AGGREGATE BASE (0.83') (SF=227,850) 12,295 TON $15.00 $194,425.00 ' IA CONST. VARIABLE THICK A.C. (SF=27,500) 350 TON $40.00 $14,000.00 OVERLAY (0.17') 38 CONST. A.C. OVER COMPACTED (SF=760) 10 TON $40.00 $400.00 BACKFILL(0.17') 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 3,870 L.F. $12.00 $46,440.00 2A CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 2,885 L.F. $12.00 $34,620.00 ' 2B CONST. 6" CURB ONLY 270 L.F. $12.00 $3,240.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK 39,575 S.F. $2.75 $108,831.25 13 CONST..DRIVEWAY APPROACH 750 S.F. $5.00 $3,750.00 ' 14 CONST. HANDICAP RAMP 8 EA. $350.00 $2,800.00 28 CONST. REDWOOD HEADER 120 L.F. $1.00 $120.00 29 CONST. 4" STAMPED CONCRETE(MEDIAN ISLAND) 5,900 S.F. $5.00 $29,500.00 ' 32 CONST. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 1,650 S.F. $4.50 $7,425.00 40 CONST. STREET BARRICADE 85 L.F. $12.00 $1,020.00 41 CONST, 5'X 5' ROCK RIP RAP 6 TON $74.00 $444.00 ' 25 REMOVE OR MODIFY EXISTING FACILITY OR BUILDING 1 L.S. $12,000.00 $12,000.00 25 REMOVE OIL WELLS 1 EA. $30,000.00 $30,000.00 26 RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 42 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METER AS REQUIRED 1 EA. $250.00 $250.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING CURB 2,165 L.F. $6.00 $12,990.00 6 REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 199,850 S.F. $0.50 $94,925.00 8 REMOVE OR RELOCATE EXISTING FENCE 2,520 L.F. $6.00 $15,120.0.0 10 REMOVE&SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN 32 EA. $100.00 $3,200.00 12 REMOVE EXISTING TREE 18 EA. $200.00 $3,600.00 34 REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN 3 EA. $1,000.00 $3,000.00 39 REMOVE EXISTING CROSS GUTTER 540 S.F. $2.50 $1,350.00 9 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE OR MANHOLE TO GRADE 20 EA. $300.00 $6,000.00 ' 20 CONST. CURB INLET(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 5 EA. $3,500.00 $17,500.00 21 CONCRETE COLLAR 2 EA.. $350.00 $700.00 23 CONST,JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE C) 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 24 CONST. 18" RCP 150 L.F. $60.00 $9,000.00 27 MODIFY EXISTING JUNCTION STRUCTURE 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 11 RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $1,500.00 •$1,500.00 ' 36 CONST, HOT TAP(INCL. VALVE) 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 37 CONST. 8" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 90 L.F. $35.00 $3,150.00 16 ICONST. 12" PVC RECLAIMED WATER MAIN 1730 IL.F. 1 $50.001 $86,500.00 Ho1ly-Seaclifl Reimbursement District 4%&=ALDEN do Cost Estimate W SSOCIATES ' January, 1993 A-18 (INCL. FITTINGS)(20" I TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 17 CONST. 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE (20" TO BE CONSTRUCTE 2 EA. $1,200.00 $2,400.00 18 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 ' 30 CONST. 2' RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE 3 EA. $2,000.00 $6,000.00 31 CONST. IRRIGATION CROSS-OVER 240 L.F. $10.00 $2,400.00 -- POWER POLE RELOCATION AND UNDERGROUNDING 1 L.S. $388,000.00 $389,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL CONDUIT, PULLBOXES&SERVICE) 7 EA. $3,500.00 $24,500.00 -- SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION (MAIN INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $130,000.00 $130,000.00 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT 1 L.S. $27,400.00 $27,400.00 -- SOUS REMEDIATION (CY=2,750) 1 L.S. $60,000.00 $60,000.00 ' -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 5,700 S.F. $2.00 $11,400.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,400.00 $10,400.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $10,400.00 $10,400.00 ' -- POTHOLING 4 EA. $14,000.00 $56,000.00 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. 1 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 ...................................... CONSTRUCTION COST €; 9$ $OQ'25.' ' MOBILIZATION (2%) $39,756.01 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $3,975.60 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $159,024.02 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $199,780.03 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $198;780.03 SOILS TESTING (4%) $79,512.01 CONTINGENCY (10%) $198,780.03 TOTAL I454Q79G` 1 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN SOC a� Cost Estimate soclATEs ' January, 1993 A-19 ' SECTION III: I. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ' FOR MAIN STREET - PHASE 4C t (BETWEEN GARFIELD AVENUE AND CLAY AVNEUE) ESTIMATED ESTIMATED O. .... .::.......... DESCRIPTION;::;;:<.;>::.;;:.;::<.;:.;>:;:::>;;;:.;:.;::<.;:.;;;;::.;;:.;::;; QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST . . .............. .......................::............:....:............................... -- UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 3,900 C.Y. $10.00 $39,000.00 1 CONST. A.C. PAVEMENT(0.40') (SF=124,900) 3,600 TON $40.00 $144,000.00 AGGREGATE BASE (0.83') (SF=124,900) 6,740 TON $15.00 $101,100.00 1A CONST. VARIABLE THICK A.C. (SF=4,230) 25 TON $40.00 $1,000.00 ' OVERLAY (0.08') 2 CONST. 8" CURB&GUTTER 2,080 L.F. $12.00 $24,960.00 2A CONST. 8" CURB ONLY 2,300 L.F. $12.00 $27,600.00 ' 2B CONST. 6" CURB&GUTTER 180 L.F. $12.00 $2,160.00 3 CONST. 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK 13,020 S.F. $2.75 $35,805.00 4 CONST. DRIVEWAY APPROACH 500 S.F. $5.00 $2,500.00 5 CONST. HANDICAP RAMP 6 EA. $350.00 $2,100.00 6 CONST. 4" STAMPED CONCRETE(MEDIAN ISLAND) 2,835 S.F. $5.00 $14,175.00 7 CONST. IRRIGATION CROSS-OVER 340 L.F. $10.00 $3,400.00 8 CONST. CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER -1,500 S.F. $4.50 $6,750.00 9 CONST. STREET BARRICADE 185 L.F. $12.00 $2,220.00 10 CONST. DOUBLE LAYER SANDBAGS 185 L.F. $2.00 $370.00 ' 11 CONST. 2" X 8" REDWOOD HEADER 185 L.F. $3.00 $555.00 12 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PULLBOX 2 EA. $250.00 $500.00 .13 ADJUST EXISTING FACILITY TO GRADE 1 EA. $100.00 $100.00 ' 14 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 96,130 S.F. $0.50 $49,065.00 15 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND/OR CURB& 100 L.F. $6.00 $600.00 GUTTER ' 16 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK OR 560 S.F. $2.00 $1,120.00 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 17 RELOCATE AND/OR ADJUST TO GRADE EXISTING TREE 14 EA. $300.00 $4,200.00 18 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING SIGN 23 EA. $100.00 $2,300.00 ' 19 REMOVE EXISTING POWER POLE • 4 EA. $1,500.00 $6,000.00 20 REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING FENCE 560 L.F. $5.00 $2,800.00 21 REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING PALM TREE 4 EA. $500.00 $2,000.00 22 REMOVE EXISTING STREET LIGHT AS REQUIRED 4 EA. $1,500.00 $6,000.00 23 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PULLBOX 1 EA. $250.00 $250.00 24 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING ELECTRICAL 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 ' PEDESTAL 25 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING VAULT 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 26 REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXIST. TEMP. BLDGS. & 1 L.S. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 STRUCTURES AND ALL ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 27 ADJUST EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE TO GRADE 2 EA. $350.00 $700.00 28 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE CAN TO GRADE 23 EA. $250.00 $5,750.00 ' 29 ADJUST EXISTING TELEPHONE PULLBOX TO GRADE 4 EA. $250.00 $1,000.00 30 ADJUST EXISTING VAULT VENT TO GRADE 1 EA. 1 $250.00 $250.00 ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District �DEN TES Cost Estimate January, 1993 A-20 31 RELOCATE AND ADJUST TER VALVE TO GRADE EA. $500.00 $1,000.00 32 ABANDON EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT I EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 ' -- NEW EDISON AND TELEPHONE BACKBONE 1 L.S. $117,500.00 $117,500.00 -- GAS MAIN RELOCATION(REFUNDABLE) I L.S. $27,000.00 $27,000.00 -- STREET LIGHTS(INCL. CONDUIT, PULLBOXES& 1 L.S. $70,500.00 $70,500.00 ' SERVICE) -- SIGNING AND STRIPING I L.S. $7,000.00 $7,000.00 -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL(CLAY INTERSECTION) 1 L.S. $130,000.00 $130,000.00 ' -- SOILS REMEDIATION (CY=2,500) 1 L.S. $50,000.00 $50,000.00 -- INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING(INCL. 90 DAY 21,700 S.F. $2.00 $43,400.00 MAINTENANCE AFTER CONSTRUCTION) -- EROSION CONTROL 1 L.S. $6,000.00 $6,000.00 -- TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S. $6,000.00 $6,000.00 -- POTHOLING 0 EA. $0.00 $0.00 -- FAIR COMPENSATION 1 L.S. $0.00 $0.00 ' CONSTRUCTION COST ` ... MOBILIZATION (2%) $19,284.60 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $1,928.46 ' INSPECTION FEES (8%) $77,139.40 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $96,423.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $96,423.00 ' SOILS TESTING (4%) $38,569.20 CONTINGENCY (10%) $96,423.00 TOTALS >+1C► 1 1 Holly-SeacliR Reimbursement District �LDEN TEs Cost Estimate ' January, 1993 A-21 03/22/93 DEDICATION/ACQUISITION TABLE ARTERIAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (FULL TAKE OF PARCELS ONLY) ACQUISITION ASSESSOR ASSESSOR PARTIAL (P) S.F. COST ESTIMATED DRAWING REF. PARCEL PARCEL OR FULL (F) TO BE PER LAND LAND NO. NO. NUMBER OWNER NAME AREA PARCEL TAKE ACQUIRED S.F. TYPE VALUE (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (6) (6) 2 9 110-211-01 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 2,800 F 2,800 $3.57 3 $10,000 2 10 110-211-02 BORGHETTI, RONALD 2,800 F 2,800 $3.57 3 10,000 2 11 110-211-03 MAROW, MILTON 5,600 F 5,600 $3.57 3 20,000 2 12A 110-211-04 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 2,800 F 2,800 $3.57 3 10,000 2 128 110-211-05 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 19,600 F 19,600 $3.57 3 70,000 2 50 & 111-150-13 WEIR, DONALD 7,250 F 7,250 $16.00 1 116,000 3 23 3 1 111-130-11 MILLS, ELIZABETH 3,650 F 3,650 $16.00 1 58,400 3 2 111-130-12 MILLS, ELIZABETH 3,600 F 3,600 $16.00 1 57,600 3 11 111-150-24 ELLIOT, WILLIS 17,168 F 17,168 $16.00 1 274,694 3 12 111-150-25 DENSLOW, PATRICIA 13,037 F 13,037 $2.50 2 32,593 78,306 SF 78,306 SF $659,287 ' LEGAL FEES 15.00% $98,893 APPRAISALS 7.50% $49,447 LITIGATION GUARANTEES 0.50% $3,296 CLOSING COSTS 7.50% $49,447 ' Column # Description TOTAL $860,370 1 Assessor Parcel Number 2 Current Property Owner 3 Parcel Area per County Assessor 4 Area Of Street R-O-W To Be Acquired. Denotes Full Or Partial Acquisition of the Parcel 5 Total Area Of Parcel To Be Acquired t 6 Zone Classification 1. Developed - $16 per S.F. 2. Undeveloped - $2.50 per S.F. 3. Encyclopedia - $10,000 Each FILE NO. C:\LOTUS\TABLE5.WK1 A-22 1 ' 2. Storm o Drain Facilities 1 Reach No. 1 $ 79,584 Reach No. 2 763,726 Reach No. 3 489,559 Reach No. 4 327,983 Reach No. 5 517,048 Reach No. 6 316,086 Reach No. 7A 85,511 Reach No. 7B 349,880 Reach No. 8 408,115 Reach No 9 154,655 Total 3492,147 1 r r r r r r r i A-23 r cl) r I� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HDLLY=8FACLFF REOMBURSENEI LEGEND AVENUE INDICAcoRRE�PXSo ROM NDINo 'TO nw -- PREuawlRf Cost EST ATE 4 J 7B INDICA E'S RICHT of WAY INDICATES PROJECT BOUNDARY - INDIG?ES PRWOSED SibRM DRAIN / 0 INDICATES MANHOLE 4EST AVENUE Z o INDIGITES CATCH BASIN rO O+ INDIC=5 TRIBUTARY AREA � f 9 Fl _J M IMF - - l� DftKMWN AVENUE SCALE: 1'-BW ""WSSEN & ' �OCIATES IAM BUMToas 160111 CO*AN. BVIT11 210. IZYM CA 02714 (714) 060-0110 FAL• 060-0410 STORM DRAIN - FACILITIES, EXHIBIT 2 A-24 SECTION IV: A. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #1 ! (SEAPOINT STREET & GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED N QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST DESCRIPTIO U O. Q ::............................................................................................................................................................ 10 CONST. TEMP. INLET TYPE V PER OCEMA STD. 1305 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 17 CONST. 19" RCP 135 L.F. $60.00 $8,100.00 18 CONST. 24" RCP 65 L.F. $70.00 $4,550.00 19 CONST. 27" RCP(EXTRA THICK) 160 L.F. $90.00 $12,800.00 20 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 3 EA. $3,500.00 $10,500.00 22 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE B) 2 EA. $4,500.00 $9,000.00 23 CONST. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION 65 TON $74.00 $4,910.00 24 CONST. HEADWALL 1 EA. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 39 CONST. TEMPORARY PLUG AT END OF RCP 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 41 CONST. DOUBLE LAYER SANDBAGS 40 L.F. $2.00 .10.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ............... I94 W MOBILIZATION (2%) $1,103.80 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $110.38 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $4,415.20 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $5,519.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $5,519.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $2,207.60 CONTINGENCY (10%) $5,519.00 TOTAL < << 935$�98'> I 1 1 HollySeacliff Reimbursement District bjALDEN & Cost Estimate VWSSOCIATES 1 January, 1993 A-25 a SECTION IV: .�. PRELIMINARY COST ESTNATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #2 (SADDLEBACK LANE NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST -- CONST. 18" RCP 55 L.F. $60.00 $3,300.00 -- CONST. 24" RCP 75 L.F. $70.00 $5,250.00 -- CONST. 42" RCP 190 L.F. $100.00 $19,000.00 -- CONST. 48" RCP 450 L.F. $120.00 $54,000.00 -- CONST. 54" RCP 385 L.F. $140.00 $53,900.00 -- CONST. 60" RCP 1,125 L.F. $160.00 $180,000.00 -- CONST. 72" RCP 690 L.F. $170.00 $117,300.00 -- CONST. 78" RCP 185 L.F. $190.00 $33,300.00 -- CONST. 84" RCP 45 L.F. $200.00 $9,000.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE A) 3 EA. $4,000.00 $12,000.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE B) 4 EA. $4,500.00 $18,000.00 ' -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE C) 6 EA. $1,500.00 $9,000.00 -- CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 2 EA. $3,500.00 $7,000.00 -- CONST. HEADWALL 1 EA. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -- CONST. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION 20 TON $74.00 $1,480.00 -- CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR 5 EA. $350.00 $1,750.00 -- CONST. TEMPORARY PLUG AT END OF RCP 2 EA. $350.00 $350.00 CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION (2%) $10,592.60 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $1,059.26 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $42,370.40 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $52,963.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $52,963.00 1 SOILS TESTING (4%) $21,185.20 CONTINGENCY (20%) $52,963.00 TOTAL 3 *:' 1 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District A%"ALDEN k Cost Estimate V SSOCIATES January, 1993 A-26 ' SECTION IV: PRELIMINARY COST ESARATE ' FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #3 (GOLDEN WEST STREET NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST . . .......... 1 CONST. 18" R.C.P. 225 L.F. $60.00 $13,500.00 2 CONST. 24" R.C.P. 235 L.F. $70.00 $16,450.00 3 CONST. 30" R.C.P. 260 L.F. $80.00 $20,800.00 4 CONST. 36" R.C.P. 830 L.F. $90.00 $74,700.00 ' 5 CONST. 42" R.C.P. 1,430 L.F. $100.00 $143,000.00 6 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE A) 3 EA. $4,000.00 $12,000.00 7 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE B) 6 EA. $4,500.00 $27,000.00 8 CONST. CURB INLET CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL 12 EA. $3,500.00 $42,000.00 1 DEPRESSION) 11 CONST. CONC. COLLAR 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 . 12 CONST, CONC. CRADLE BETWEEN STORM DRAIN& 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 ' EXISTING 12" SEWER 13 CONST. INLET TO EXIST 78" RCP 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 14 CONST. 1' WIDE FULL DEPTH A.C. SECTION 50 L.F. $3.00 $150.00 ' 16 REMOVE EXIST. CURB&GUTTER 50 L.F. $6.00 $300.00 17 CONST. TEMP. PLUG AT END OF RCP 3 EA. $350.00 $1,050.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ` $3glSO0 € MOBILIZATION (2%) $6,790.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $679.00 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $27,160.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $33,950.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $33,950.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $13,580.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) $33,950.00 TOTAL r Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District b=ALDEN & Cost Estimate WWSSoclnTES January, 1993 r ,0,_27 ' SECTION IV: D. PRELIMINARY COST ES'l iMATE 1 FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #4 1 (GOLDEN WEST STREET NORTHEAST TO ELLIS AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ................................................. -- CONST. 72" R.C.P. 1,200 L.F. $170.00 $204,000.00 ' -- CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR 1 EA. $700.00 $700.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE A) 2 EA. $4,000.00 $8,000.00 >« >SZ CONSTRUCTION COST 7I MOBILIZATION (2%) $4,254.00 ' PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $425.40 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $17,016.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $21,270.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $21,270.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $8,508.00 ' CONTINGENCY (20%) $42,540.00 TOTAL > �32'f983d0< 1 Holly-Seadiff Reimbursement District LDEN k Estimate ate W SSOCIATES January, 1993 1 A-28 ' SECTION IV: E. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIATE ' FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #5 I (GOTHARD STREET CROSSING NORTHWEST TO ELLIS AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST :.; 31 CONST. 24" RCP 75 L.F. $70.00 $5,250.00 ' 33 CONST. 94" RCP 330 L.F. $200.00 $66,000.00 34 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE A) 1 EA. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 36 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 2 EA. $3,500.00 $7,000.00 ' 39 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE C) 2 EA. $1,500.00 $3,000.00 40 CONST. HEADWALL 2 EA. $5,000.00 $10,000.00 41 CONST. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION 140 TON $74.00 $10,360.00 68 CONST, PROTECTION BARRIER 2 EA. $500.00 $1,000.00 -- CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR(PRELIMINARY) 1 EA. $700.00 $700.00 -- CONST. TRANSITION STRUCTURE (PRELIMINARY) 1 EA. $10,000.00 $10,000.00 -- CONST. 84' RCP(PRELIMINARY) 1,070 L.F. $200.00 $214,000.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (PRELIMINARY) 1 EA. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ''> S33S3t104 ' MOBILIZATION (2%) $6,706.20 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $670.62 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $26,824.80 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $33,531.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $33,531.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $13,412.40 CONTINGENCY (20%) $67,062.00 TOTAL <>[` 51748{?2 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District b:ALDEN & Cost Estimate WWSSOCIATES January, 1993 1 A-29 SECTION IV: F. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #6 (GOTHARD STREET NORTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE TO CROSSING) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 5f) .:...................:..:.........:....::.,......:::............::..::::;:::;::::,:::.....:._::..........:......::...........,.:.:..:.:........... 31 CONST. 24" RCP 650 L.F. $70.00 $45,500.00 ' 32 CONST. 54" RCP 475 L.F. $140.00 $66,500.00 34 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE A) 3 EA. $4,000.00 $12,000.00 35 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE B) 2 EA. $4,500.00 $9,000.00 ' 36 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 5 EA. $3,500.60 $17,500.00 38 CONST. TEMPORARY PLUG AT END OF RCP 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 53 CONST. 30" RCP 850 L.F. $80.00 $69,000.00 67 CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR 1 EA. 1 $350.00 $350.00 CONSTRUCTION COST <> MOBILIZATION (2%) $4,394.00 ' PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $438.40 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $17,536.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $21,920.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $21,920.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $8,768.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) $21,920.00 TOTAL 335Ef864` 1 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN k Cost Estimate W SSOCIATES January, 1993 A-30 ' SECTION IV: 0. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH VA (GOTHARD STREET SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE TO CROSSING) ESTMIATED UNIT ESTWATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 31 CONST. 24" RCP 685 L.F. $70.00 $47,950.00 34 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE A) 1 EA. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 36 CONST. CATCH BASIN(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 2 EA. $3,500.00 $7,000.00 67 CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR 1 EA. $350.00 $350.00 ...................................... ' CONSTRUCTION COST 59 3EIO D(... MOBILIZATION (2%) $1,186.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $118.60 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $4,744.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $5,930.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $5,930.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $2,372.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) $5,930.00 TOTAL 1 ' HoW-Seaclitf Reimbursement District ALDEN & Cost Estimate VnSSOCUTES January, 1993 ' A-31 SECTION IV: _A. PRELIMINARY COST ES i_ -4ATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH if7B (FROM GOTHARD STREET CROSSING NORTHEAST TO ELLIS AVENUE) 1 ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST -- CONST. 72" R.C.P. 1,160 L.F. $170.00 $197,200.00 -- REMOVE EXISTING 72" C.M.P. 330 L.F. $50.00 $16,500.00 -- CONST. CONCRETE COLLAR 1 EA. $700.00 $700.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE A) 2 EA. $4,000.00 $8,000.00 -- CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE B) 1 EA. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 ' CONSTRUCTION COST s......IQ O MOBILIZATION (2%) $4,538.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $453.80 ' INSPECTION FEES (8%) $18,152.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $22,690.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $22,690.00 ' SOILS TESTING (4%) $9,076.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) $459380.00 TOTAL HollySeacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN & Cost Estimate ASSOCIATES January, 1993 ' A-32 ' SECTION IV: 1. PRELIMINARY COST ESTOATE FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #8 1 (ELLIS AVENUE CROSSING AND DEBRIS BASIN) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST »:i:> 51�C)RiV 'DRAIN:>:>::>:::><:>::>:>:>::>:>: :::....>:::>::>::>:::>::;::>::>::>::::>>:>:>:>:<:>:>:>:>_:<_<:>:»::>'::>::>:<:'.:>< ...........:.....:::...:...; .;.<::;:::;::::................,....................:.......... 1 CONST. 72" RCP(2500 D—LOAD) 430 L.F. $170.00 $73,100.00 2 CONST. STORM DRAIN HEADWALL 1 EA. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 CONST. STORM DRAIN ENDWALL WITH WINGWALLS 1 EA. $15,000.00 $15,000.00 4 CONST. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION 330 TON $74.00 $24,420.00 5 CONST. PROTECTION BARRIER 4 EA. $500.00 $2,000.00 6 CONST. DEBRIS BASIN PER OCEMA STD. 1327 (INCL. 1 L.S. $150,000.00 $150,000.00 EARTHWORK, DRAIN PIPE, RIP RAP&ROAD) ' 7 CONST. 19" P.V.C. SDR 35 INCL. REQ'D. FITTINGS& 20 L.F. $70.00 $1,400.00 CONNECTION) 8 CONST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE(TYPE C) 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 9 CONST. 4' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE 100 L.F. $10.00 $1,000.00 11 REMOVE EXISTING STORM DRAIN 65 L.F. $40.00 $2,600.00 -- CONST. CATCH BASIN (INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 2 EA. 1 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 ...................................... CONSTRUCTION COST [s32 4ttt MOBILIZATION (2%) $5,660.40 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $566.04 ' INSPECTION FEES (8%) $22,641.60 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $28,302.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $28,302.00 i SOILS TESTING (4%) $11,320.80 CONTINGENCY (10%) $28,302.00 TOTAL < < t)>r44 i 1 i � 1 ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District A%"ALDEN h Cost EStlmate SSOCIATES ' January, 1993 A-33 SECTION IV: J. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ' FOR STORM DRAIN - REACH #9 (GARFIELD AVENUE FROM GOTHARD STREET TO HOLLY STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED h DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST Riff'Ji »» ..... ' >< <` ' <NST. CURB INLET(INCL. LOCAL DEPRESSION) 2 EA. $3,500.00 $7,000.00 MOVE EXISTING 36" R.C.P. 40 L.F. $45.00 $1,900.00 NST. PRESSURE MANHOLE 2 EA. $4,500.00 $9,000.00 NST. JUNCTION STRUCTURE (TYPE B) 1 EA. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 24 CONST. 42" RCP 790 L.F. $100.00 $79,000.00 25 CONST. 24" RCP 80 L.F. $70.00 $5,600.00 26 CONST. TEMPORARY PLUG AT END OF RCP 1 EA. 1 $350.00 $350.00 ' CONSTRUCTION COST 1Q7fft MOBILIZATION (2%) $2,145.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $214.50 ' INSPECTION FEES (8%) $8,580.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $10,725.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $10,725.00 ' SOILS TESTING (4%) $4,290.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) $10,725.00 TOTAL S? 1 ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District At"ALDEN a Cost Estimate WnSSOCIATES ' January, 1993 A-34 1 3. Sewer Facilities Reach No. 1 $ 108,042 Reach No. 2 217,191 Reach No. 3 58,827 Reach No. 4 785,890 -..Totn : 1169,950> r - i A-36 C i ooe F1 AVFNtJ ftwftft ILI 7 I�_ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH H8LL'f=8EACL.0FF REOMBURSEMEG PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW CITY PUMP srArioN LEGEND EWS AV`UE r 1 3 \ Q INDICATES REACH NUMBER CORRESPONDING PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ��— XIST. CITY INDICATES ROOT OF WAY PUMP F; --• -•—8 STATION TO INDICATES PROJECT BOUNDARY GS r� BE REMOVED 8'— INDICATES PROPOSED SEWER o ---(!Y'}— INDICATES EXISIINO SEWER IESf AVENUE �� INDICATES Tikiaulnv AREA +...� s © TRBIJfARY AREA DEWMTION --w GAIrflE1 AVENUE r L_. C i ICI (t i RKrOWN AVENUE•- SCALE. 1'-800' Cm Vcuum ALDEN & P NNIM SSOCIATES LAND mmy01j 16012 COWAN. Satre 210. revue• CA 92714 (714) e80-OHO FAM 600-041e SEWER FACILITIES EXHIBIT 3 17 D0� U ���� A-37 SECTION V: PRELIMINARY COST ESTL..ATE ' FOR SEWER-REACH #1 (GARFIELD AVENUE BETWEEN SADDLEBACK LANE AND GOLDEN WEST STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE. COST 66 CONST. 12" P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 1,240 L.F. $50.00 $62,000.00 67 CONST. 8" PVC SEWER MAIN 65 L.F. $35.00 $2,275.00 68 CONST. 48" SEWER MANHOLE 5 EA. $2,000.00 $10,000.00 ' 69 REMOVE CLEANOUT&CONNECT TO EXISTING SEWER 1 EA. $200.00 $200.00 70 CONST. TEMPORARY SEWER PLUG 3 EA. 1 $150.00 $450.00 CONSTRUCTION COST ffig # 9 M MOBILIZATION (2%) $1,498.50 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $149.95 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $5,994.00 ' ADMINISTRATION (10%) $7,492.50 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $7,492.50 SOILS TESTING (4%) $2,997.00 ' CONTINGENCY (10%) 1 $7,492.50 TOTAL 1 . ' Hollyseacliff Reimbursement District �LDEN k COSt FStimate SSOCIATES January, 1993 ' A-38 SECTION V: B. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR SEWER-REACH #2 (GOTHARD STREET NORTH, EAST & WEST OF CROSSING) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 42 CONST. 48" SEWER MANHOLE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ' 43 CONST. 60" SEWER DROP MANHOLE 2 EA. $2,500.00 $5,000.00 45 CONST. 10" P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 160 L.F. $40.00 $6,400.00 46 CONST. 15" P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 600 L.F. $55.00 $33,000.00 ' 47 CONST. TEMPORARY SEWER PLUG 3 EA. $150.00 $450.00 48 BREAK INTO AND MODIFY EXISTING MANHOLE BASE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 -- CONST. 60" SEWER DROP MANHOLE(PRELIMINARY) 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 ' -- CONST. 15" P.V.C. SEWER LINE (PRELIMINARY) 1300 L.F. $55.00 $71,500.00 -- CONST. 10" P.V.C. SEWER LINE (PRELIMINARY) 200 L.F. $40.00 $8,000.00 -- REMOVE EXISTING PUMP STATION 1 1L.S. 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION (2%) $2,817.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $291.70 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $11,268.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $14,085.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $14,085.00 ' SOILS TESTING (4%) $5,634.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) $28,170.00 TOTAL ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District 'b:AMEN & Cost Estimate WnSSOCIATES ' January, 1993 A-39 SECTION V: C. PRELIMINARY COST ESTMATE ' FOR SEWER-REACH #3 (STEWART STREET SOUTH OF GARFIELD AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION;:.;:.;:.;;::;;;:.;;:.;:.:;:,.:.;;:;;;.;:.;:.::.;;:.;.;;:;.>:.;;:.; >:;:.;;:.>;;:.;>:.... >;: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ..... ......,........ -- CONST. 48" SEWER MANHOLE 3 EA. $2,000.00 $6,000.00 ' -- CONST. 10" P.V.C. SEWER LINE 800 L.F. $40.00 $32,000.00 -- CONST. TEMPORARY SEWER PLUG 1 EA. $150.00 $150.00 CONSTRUCTION COST < MOBII.IZATION (2%) $763.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $76.30 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $3,052.00 ' ADMINISTRATION (10%) $3,915.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $3,815.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $1,526.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) $7,630.00 TOTAL < ` fiSB ? i ' Holly-Seacliff Reimbursemnt District �LDEN k Cost Estimate SSOCIATES January, 1993 A-40 SECTION V: j. PRELPAINARY COST ES&TE FOR ' SEWER-REACH #4 (ELLIS AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDEN WEST STREET & LIFT STATION) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST 1 CONST. 15' P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 325 L.F. $55.00 $17,875.00 2 CONST. 60" SEWER DROP MANHOLE I EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 ' 3 CONST. 48' SEWER MANHOLE 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 4 CONST. TEMPORARY SEWER PLUG 1 EA. $150.00 $150.00 5 REMOVE PLUG AND JOIN EXISTING SEWER 1 EA. $50.00 $50.00 6 CONST. 10" P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 870 L.F. $40.00 $34,800.00 7 CONST. CONC. ECCENTRIC MANHOLE W/PRESSURE SHA 2 EA. $3,000.00 $6,000.00 &PLATE ' 8 CONST. SEWER LIFT STATION I L.S. $500,000.00 $500,000.00 9 CONST. 12' P.V.C. SEWER LINE(INCL. FITTINGS) 270 L.F. $50.00 $13,500.00 10 CONST. 60' ECCENTRIC MANHOLE 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 ' CONSTRUCTION COST " 5± QX. MOBILIZATION (2%) $10,900.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $1,090.00 ' INSPECTION FEES (8%) $43,600.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $54,500.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $54,500.00 t SOILS TESTING (4%) $21,800.00 CONTINGENCY (10%) $54,500.00 TOTAL 1 Holly-Seacli0 Reimbursement District A%X2 ALDEN & Cost Estimate SSOCIATES January, 1993 A41 4 Fa cilities ac ili ties 1 Reach No. 1 S 161,756 ' Reach No. 2 60,167 Reach No. 3 118,888 Reach No. 4 292,582 ' Reach No 5 244,419 S[JBTOTAL $ 8779$12 s ' Water Reservoir and Related Facilities 13 546,188 Tore $ 14,424,000. 1 A-42 C g� LEf ole L @§ L � 6 it CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HDLLY==SEACL9FF REOMBURBENE5 ■ LEGEND r.EWS—AVENUE -..� / 03 MDICATES REACH NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO THE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ` •�— 1 INDICATES RIGHT OF WAY / ) ---•--•— INDICATES PROJECT BOUNDARY 1 —ir— INDICATES PROPOSED WATER LINE QQ Z --{11 }— INDICATES EXISTING WATER LINE AVENUE I 1 1 /\ 1 i AVENUE _j i i T i i i i 1 TOWN AVENUE SCALE: 1'n800' ALDEN & C"�'fD 818■''pwiKM SSOCIATES L °61f01s 1801E COWAN. SUITS 210. MYM. CA 92714 (714) 060-0110 VAL• 660-0418 DOMESTIC WATER FACILITIES A-43 EXHIBIT 4 ' SECTION VI: A. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR DOMESTIC WATER-REACH #1 (ELLIS AVENUE BETWEEN GOTHARD STREET & HUNTINGTON STREET) r ESTIMATED UNIT ESTMIATED O. DESCRIPTION;;>:.;:.:;:.;;;;,.;:.;;;:.;:.;;;;:.;:.;::.;: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST »............. -- CONST. 12" P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 850 L.F. $50.00 $42,500.00 r -- CONST. 12" RW VALVE 2 EA. $1,200.00 $2,400.00 -- CONST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 2 EA. $2,500.00 $5,000.00 -- CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 ' -- CONST. 8" P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 1400 EA. $35.00 $49,000.00 -- CONST. 8" RW VALVE 2 EA. 1 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COSTtx < MOBILIZATION (2%) $2,098.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $209.90 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $8,392.00 ' ADMINISTRATION (10%) $10,490.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $10,490.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $4,196.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) $20,980.00 TOTAL16 '755$Q€ 1 r r r r � = Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN k _ Cost Estimate - nSSOCJATES \� January, 1993 A-44 ' SECTION VI: B. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR DOMESTIC WATER-REACH #2 (GARFIELD AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDEN WEST STREET & STEWART STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST ATfs .....:. ........ . 17 CONST. HOT TAP 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 15 CONST. 12" P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 660 L.F. $50.00 $33,000.00 42 CONST. 8" WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 15 EA. $35.00 $525.00 43 CONST. 12" GATE VALVE 1 EA. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 44 CONST. 8" GATE VALVE 1 EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 18 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ......................._....... CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION (2%) $934.50 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $83.45 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $3,338.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $4,172.50 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $4,172.50 SOILS TESTING (4%) $1,669.00 ' CONTINGENCY (10%) $4,172.50 TOTAL ' HoW-Seacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN & Cost Estimate WnSSOCIATES January, 1993 A-45 ' SECTION VI: c:. PRELIMINARY COST ESTNATE r FOR DOMESTIC WATER-REACH i#3 (FUTURE STREET BETWEEN GOLDEN WEST STREET & GOTHARD STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O.1 ;DESCRIPTION:.;;:.;;:.;;>;:.;;:.;;>:::<;:::;::;:.;;;>:.;::.;,<.;;>;;:.;:.;:.;;;;:.;.....:.::.:....... QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST >_.A.... .:»<::>`:<>;<�;>:»:<:>:>[::»:>:>:>::::: CONST. 12 P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 1,350 L.F. $50.00 $67,500.00 -- CONST. 12" RW VALVE 3 EA. $1,200.00 $3,600.00 -- CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 -- CONST. HOT TAP(INCL. VALVE) 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 ...................................... CONSTRUCTION COST 7" fIO ' MOBILIZATION (2%) $1,542.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $154.20 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $6,168.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $7,710.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $7,710.00 i SOILS TESTING (4%) $3,084.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) 6 $15,420.00 TOTAL i 1 1 t 1 1 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District ALDEN & Cost Estimate ASSOCIATES January, 1993 r. A-46 SECTION VI: ' D. PRELIMINARY COST &MATE FOR DOMESTIC WATER-REACH #4 (ELLIS AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDEN WEST STREET & GOTHARD STREET) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST W..±�TER.:. ...... 23 CONST. 12" P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 2,365 L.F. $50.00 $118,250.00 25 CONST, 12' RW VALVE 4 EA. $1,200.00 $4,800.00 26 CONST. AIR AND VACUUM RELEASE VALVE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 27 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 3 EA. $2,000.00 $6,000.00 29 CONST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 3 EA. $2,500.00 $7,500.00 ' 32 REMOVE BLOW OFF AND JOIN EXISTING WATER 3 EA. $50.00 $150.00 -- CONST. 12" PVC WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 910 L.F. $50.00 $45,500.00 -- CONST. 12" RW VALVE 6 EA. $1,200.00 $7,200.00 -- CONST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $2,500.00 $2,500.00 -- CONST. 4' BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 2 EA. $2,000.00 $4,000.00 -- CONST. 2'VAC&AIR RELEASE VALVE 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 ' -- CONST. 8" RW VALVE 1 EA. $1,000.00 $1,000.00 -- CONST. HOT TAP 1 jEA. 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 CONSTRUCTION COST MOBILIZATION (2%) $4,058.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $405.80 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $16,232.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $20,290.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $20,290.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $8,116.00 CONTINGENCY (10%,) $20,290.00 TOTAL >> 2925$ $1 1 1 Holly-Seadiff Reimbursement District VWSSEN x OCIATES Cost Estimate January, 1993 A-47 ' SECTION VI: E. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOR DOMESTIC WATER—REACH #5 (GOTHARD STREET BETWEEN GARFIELD AVENUE AND ELLIS AVENUE) ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED O. ;:.;;:.;:<.;::.;::;.;DESCRIPTION;;;;.;;::«.;:.;:.;;:.;;;;:.;:.;:.;;:.>:.;:.;;;:.;:.;:.;;;;:;:.> :.;::.;;;::.:;;.;:.;: QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST If' , 11 RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 EA. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 19 CONST. 12' P.V.C. WATER MAIN(INCL. FITTINGS) 2975 L.F. $50.00 $148,750.00 24 CONST. 12" RW VALVE 6 EA. $1,200.00 $7,200.00 28 CONST. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 4 EA. $2,500.00 $10,000.00 29 CONST. 4" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 1 EA. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 56 REMOVE PLUG AND JOIN EXISTING WATER 1 EA. $50.00 $50.00 CONSTRUCTION COST < ' 1693E0a €' MOBILIZATION (2%) $3,390.00 PLAN CHECK FEES (.2%) $339.00 INSPECTION FEES (8%) $13,560.00 ADMINISTRATION (10%) $16,950.00 ENGINEERING AND STAKING (10%) $16,950.00 SOILS TESTING (4%) $6,780.00 CONTINGENCY 00%) $16,950.00 TOTAL >'S?A440 Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District 'b=ALDEN e Cost Estimate SSOCIATEs January, 1993 A48 1 r 5. Fire Station, Police Station, and Incidentals Fire Station $ 3,266,550 Police Substation 678,450 TOTAL $ 3945000 . .... .. INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 100,000 PROTECT;TOTAL $ 60,977,242 r r r r r r r . A-49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � APPENDIg B RIGHT-OF-WAl' ACQUISITION a1 rTOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSESSOR TO BE 1 PARCEL LAND ACQUIRED TOTAL RIGHT MAP REFERENCE LIEN NUMBER TYPE (SQ. FT.) OF WAY PROPERTY OWNER PAGE NUMBER NUMBER (1) (2) (3) COST (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 4 1 110-015-57 * 2 * 26,400 * $66,000 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 3 3 110-015-59 * 3 * 13,200 * $3,175 * S.C.E. 1 5 4 110-015-77 * 2 * 182,543 * $456,358 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 15 576 110-200-13 * 2 * 1,320 * $3,300 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 14 577 110-200-14 * 2 * 1,320 * $3,300 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 8 578 110-200-17 * 2 * 82,540 * $206,350 * GARFIELD PARTNERS 1 9 579 110-200-18 * 2 * 18,150 * $45,375 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 10 580 110-200-19 * 2 * 9,075 * $22,688 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 11 581 110-200-20 * 2 * 9,075 * $22,688 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 12 582 110-200-21 * 3 * 18,150 * $1,000 * BLASGEN, MICHAEL 1 13 583 110-200-22 * 2 * 42,599 * $106,498 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 1 2 585 110-200-32 * 2 * 144,108 * $360,270 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 1 271 110-210-01 * 2 * 1,428 * $3,570 * LANDIS, WILLIAM 2 2 272 110-210-02 * 2 * 2,475 * $6,188 * DAHL, DAVID 2 3A 273 110-210-03 * 2 * 594 * $1,485 * NICCOLE, MICHAEL 2 5 275 110-210-06 * 2 * 825 * $2,063 * SCHUESLER, JOHN 2 6 276 110-210-07 * 2 * 1,100 * $2,750 * SPELTS, LOUIS 2 7 277 110-210-08 * 2 * 1,650 * $4,125 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 8 278 110-210-09 * 2 * 8,250 * $20,625 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 36 279 110-210-10 * 2 * 935 * S2,338 * NICCOLE, MICHAEL 2 13A 328 110-220-02 * 1 * 8,250 * $132,000 * BRINDLE, RONALD 2 138 329 110-220-03 * 1 * 5,000 * $80,000 * BRINDLE, RONALD 2 13C 330 110-220-04 * 1 * 3,322 * $53,152 * BRINDLE, RONALD 2 6 587 110-230-12 * 2 * 131,747 * $329,368 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 35 433 111-072-04 * 2 * 95,398 * $238,495 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. ' 2 69 434 111-072-05 * 2 * 45,411 * $113,528 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 67 435 111-072-07 * 2 * 3,200 * $8,000 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 66 436 111-072-08 * 2 * 3,200 * $8,000 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 70 437 111-072-09 * 2 * 964 * $2,410 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES ' 2 65 439 111-072-11 * 2 * 6,600 * $16,500 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 64 "0 111-072-12 * 2 * 6,600 * $16,500 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 158 441 111-072-14 * 2 * 8,250 * $20,625 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 16 442 111-072-15 * 2 * 8,250 * $20,625 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 17A 443 111-072-17 * 2 * 7,500 * $18,750 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 15/15A 4" 111-072-18 * 2 * 20,331 * S50,828 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 68 445 111-072-20 * 2 * 37,425 * $93,563 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 17B 446 111-072-21 * 2 * 7,750 * $19,375 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 2 30 390 111-110-07 * 3 * 4,430 * $85,898 * URBINE, PEARL 2 32 391 111-110-10 * 1 * 1,100 * $17,600 * DUNN, ROBERT 2 33 392 111-110-14 * 2 * 1,289 * $3,223 * TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER 2 34 393 111-110-15 * 1 * 249 * $3,984 * GALICH, JERRY 2 63 397 111-110-20 * 2 * 155 * $388 * RAMSY, MICHAEL TR 2 18 407 111-120-01 * 1 * 3,288 * $52,608 * S & C OIL CO. 2 21A 408 111-120-06 * 1 * 1,173 * $18,768 * THOMAS, LINDA ' 2 21B 409 111-120-07 * 1 * 1,380 * $22,080 * THOMAS, LINDA 2 21C 410 111-120-08 * 2 * 4,350 * $10,875 * THOMAS, LINDA 2 22 411 111-120-09 * 2 * 3,810 * $9,525 * THOMAS, JOHN B-2 TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSESSOR TO BE PARCEL LAND ACQUIRED TOTAL RIGHT MAP REFERENCE LIEN NUMBER TYPE (SQ. FT.) OF WAY PROPERTY OWNER PAGE NUMBER NUMBER (1) (2) (3) COST (4) r _ ___ __________ _ _____ _ _______ _ _______ ______ ________2________23A_ _______412__ _ ___________________ 111-120-11 * 1 * 5,201_ _______ * $83,216__*_LINGLE,_HAROLD__TR_ 2 238 413 111-120-12 * 1 * 1,609 * $25,744 * LINGLE, HAROLD TR 2 24A 414 111-120-13 * 1 * 1,600 * $25,600 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 24B 415 111-120-14 * 1 * 1,600 * $25,600 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 24C 416 111-120-15 * 1 * 1,600 * $25,600 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 25 417 111-120-16 * 2 * 3,200 * $8,000 * ARMSTRONG, COLLEEN 2 26 418 111-120-17 * 2 * 1,600 * $4,000 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 27 419 111-120-18 * 2 * 1,600 * $4,000 * JOHNSON, CHARLES 2 28 420 111-120-19 * 2 * 1,600 * $4,000 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 29 421 111-120-20 * 1 * 3,420 * $54,720 * THOMAS, JOHN ' 2 19 428 111-120-28 * 2 * 4,555 * $11,388 * WEIR OIL CO. 2 22 430 111-120-30 * 2 * 100 * $250 * THOMAS, JOHN 2 43 512 111-130-01 * 2 * 1,620 * $4,050 * WEIR OIL CO. 2 42 513 111-130-02 * 2 * 2,100 * $5,250 * WEIR OIL CO. 2 39 515 111-130-06 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * PETERSEN, HELEN 2 38B 516 111-130-07 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * LINGLE, HAROLD TR 2 38A 517 111-130-08 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * LINGLE, HAROLD TR 2 37 518 111-130-09 * 2 * 2,800 * $7,000 * WILLIAMS, BOBBIE 2 36 519 111-130-10 * 2 * 1,409 * S3,523 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 3 4 522 111-130-14 * 2 * 2,700 * $6,750 * WILLIAMS, 80881E 3 5 523 111-130-15 * 1 * 4,350 * $69,600 * RENNER, WILVIAN 3 6 524 111-130-16 * 2 * 4,350 * $10,875 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 3 7 525 111-130-17 * 2 * 4,350 * $10,875 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 3 8 526 111-130-18 * 2 * 6,727 * $16,818 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 41 534 111-130-26 * 2 * 2,100 * S5,250 * WEIR OIL CO. 2 49 537 111-140-01 * 1 * 3,048 * $48,768 * TELFORD, LORAYNE 2 48C 538 111-140-02 * 2 * 700 * $1,750 * WEIR, DONALD TR 2 47C 539 111-140-04 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * WEAVER & MOLA 2 476 540 111-140-05 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * WEAVER & MOLA 2 47A 541 111-140-06 * 2 * 2,800 * $7,000 * WEAVER & MOLA 2 46 542 111-140-07 * 2 * 2,800 * $7,000 * LINGLE, HAROLD TR 2 45 543 111-140-08 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * WEAVER & KOLA 2 44 544 111-140-09 * 2 * 1,620 * $4,050 * LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 2 48B 567 111-140-36 * 2 * 700 * $1,750 * WEIR, DONALD TR 2 48A 568 111-140-37 * 2 * 1,400 * $3,500 * WEIR, DONALD TR 3 22 472 111-150-15 * 1 * 2,000 * $32,000 * GOWDY, ROBERT 1 3 21 473 111-150-16 * 1 * 2,000 * $32,000 * GOWDY, ROBERT 3 20 474 111-150-17 * 1 * 4,000 * $64,000 * SCOTT, WILLIAM 3 19 475 111-150-18 * 2 * 2,472 * $6,180 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 3 18 476 111-150-19 * 2 * 1,891 * $4,728 * ARLINE, ROBRECHT 3 17 477 111-150-20 * 2 * 1,891 * $4,728 * ARLINE, RO8RECHT' 3 16 478 111-150-21 * 1 * 2,021 * S32,336 * ATKINSON, FRANK & DONNA 3 15 479 111-150-22 * 2 * 1,554 * $3,885 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 3 14 480 111-150-23 * 2 * 2,458 * $6,145 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES ' 3 13 483 111-150-26 * 2 * 4,307 * $10,768 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 3 25 496 111-150-40 * 2 * 2,690 * $6,725 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 51 500 111-150-47 * 2 * 1,245 * $3,113 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES B-3 r i TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ASSESSOR TO BE PARCEL LAND ACQUIRED TOTAL RIGHT MAP REFERENCE LIEN NUMBER TYPE (SQ. FT.) OF WAY PROPERTY OWNER PAGE NUMBER NUMBER (1) (2) (3) COST (4) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- r2 74 449 159-191-01 * 2 * 1,113 * $2,783 * HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 2 71B 450 159-191-02 * 2 * 2,108 * $5,270 * HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 2 72 451 159-191-03 * 2 * 4,551 * $11,378 * HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 2 73 452 159-191-04 * 2 * 4,718 * $11,795 * HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 2 61 502 159-281-01 * 2 * 2,023 * $5,058 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 60 503 159-281-02 * 2 * 2,000 * $5,000 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 59 504 159-281-03 * 1 * 719 * $11,504 * HASSETT, GLORIA 3 24 506 159-281-05 * 2 * 1,113 * $2,783 * PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2 75 454 159-311-02 * 2 * 19 * $48 * HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' 104 104 1,114,711 $3,555,955 104 Column # Description 1 Assessor Parcel Number 2 Land Type 1. Developed $16 per S.F. 2. Undeveloped $2.50 per S.F. 3. Property already acquired 3 Total Area Of Parcel To Be Acquired 4 Current Property Owner C:\LOTUS\tablel.WK1 03/30/93 01:24 PM r r r B-4 / � 1 l �U -7 l ' iL IIII -T11 I lhilhlhi 1111M F111 i EL L IS AVE NU!F---,�11 I 1=1 I I ...... i WHIM 11 WHIH ,I7 IWl � 1 III i i 3 _ l = AREAS OF II RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION CO 4 A 0 15 LEGEND 14 Patterns denote Right of Way Acquisition from individual parcels 16 13 i8 U, ft--- ... . . . .. //////�4/................... ........ t M11 ........... ....... ............... ............. ...... . .... ... . ..... ................. . ......... . .............. -- ---- fill III - SCuE: 1'-50' JOB V�ksDEN & HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT OCIATES COST REIMBURSEMENT EXHIBIT 5 Ell 1-1 c. I—. SHEET EDWARDS QUARTER SECTION I OF UNTI.CTO.BE.C.,CAL1101.11 3 B-5 EWS AVENUE — -- ' 1 � 2 I l + e \ AREAS OF ° RIGHT OF WAY i ACQUISITION e . I � t 1 I 7 �J 7 ' I � I i LEGEND i Patterns denote i Right of Way Acquisition from individual parcels L J; --, — CARFI fLD AVENUE I I i i IV 4 !09 NUYPf:P � VALDEN.& "� � HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT once-zls !� �SSOCLATES ,NR^ ,n o�rz_iov.: g COST REIMBURSEMENT EXHIBIT °erc�ieo 0.1N.Ml[RI,.RMN[.fJ MIS HOLLY QUARTER SECTION 2 or ., «MII AN - -_- NUMtIN0i0N BE1CN, UEORI 3 Y z GARFl FLD AVENUE — — ——— 1 I " , f „ S I AREAS OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION - - r I B r Fc, ` LEGEND / / I ' Patterns denote Right of Way Acquisition from individual parcels I � I I YORKTOWN AVENUE SCALE:I-1r, S I lOB NUYBf.N 'a° a"' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT VCHERCUD: ALDEN & .uNNmSSOCIATES �NesumronCOST REIMBURSEMENT EXHIBIT e=. n e Iee1e xeu�.eum eye,nnolB,u m1. 8 1 PIN NN-ONs f1L eN-w• SNBLT GOLDENWEST AND GOTHARD 3 or W19'�•eYseN ea Ie� uR NUNTINGTON BEACH.CMITOII" 3 - B-7 ' SHEET 1 OF 12 ACCPAIED AND HIED COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT AT OF HU TITOI THE CITY xnNGncroN s1uLa+ DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 DATE TIME FIE: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INMUMENT• BOOK PAGE COUNTY OF ORANGE LEE A.BRANCH STATE OF CAUFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT ' A REIMBURSEMENT LIEN WAS LEVIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,STATE OF CALIFORNIA.ON THE PARCELS OF REIMBURSEMENT SHOWN ON THIS COST RESEM DISTRICT DIAGRAM: SAID LIEN WAS LEVIED ON THE DAY OF 1993 REFERENCE IS MADE TO RESOLUT10 71 WOO. RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CRY 0 ER K AUTHORIZING THE REIMBURSEMENT LIEN BE LEVIED ON THE PARCELS OF LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM. CRY CLERK 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ELLIS AVENUE Q• I ?�' HT H Q.I CV a1 CO W a I Q• I i � I +� -1 E�RNIST 4ENDE `Stij I I L--ILE sHT. 5 1 i 1. I (SEE HT 6 $la II D / y I IGARFU:LD AVENUE IF � i E IOS ttm PA. `W C�NC I ' `GNU q4 f w ST. _ 46, j / SEE SHT. II LEGEND: N.A.P. NOT A PART. BY DEPUTY THERECORDEDYO BJ THEUNT OFFINGTO N OF CH SUP&tHRFJi AY F SRtFPi3 OF FILED D!THE OFFI�OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUMWO. T!ffi CITY OF HUM47610N BBAO2f 7H6 MY OF 199] TON BRACH TIM-DAY OF .Mi ' AIFBRBI!ffiiD@R'OF 37REU S QYY Cal[ QTY OF HUNTRO T1ON BEACH /► QIY OF HUNTINGTON BLUM C-2 ' SHEET 2 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 C(TY OF HUNnWTON BEACH COUNTY OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CALFOFM ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT �y Q B ELLIS AVE. L w LW N.A.P. ~ N O N d low -L✓S-37 W 4 /m-acr-77 O c � S /M-GrS-73 w WW�y tll S M.A.P. LEOENQ GARFIELD AVENUE N.A.P. NOT A PART SEE SHEET 12 C-3 SHEET 3 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 CITY OF HU TIPWON BEACH COMM OF ORANGE STATE OF CALFOFM ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT 70 /.Sf-30-O/ • A 1Q3 N.j LPe A It /Jf-J9J-LN N - .W __ {• 7J Aw-9fJ-Qt 7B Al' __ � �_ •A ' N.A.P. c M �f -- Y ar aftNAP. F N.A.P. 7G 15Y-J1J-O7 Ag .YG 7A /JfNA.P. 7f /Jf-3fJ-/O /J 70 LOT C_ rtR'-3f!-/3 B3 /JP-J9J-/4 Aw-50-/S ,95 GIG I"-.l1J-/7 ,97 /.47-.ftf -.!f es /J9-Jf3-AV ' fb /7f-JRf-V fi /-W-3f3-PZ CHERRY !t r19f-JDJ-L! ' STREET Pa .`Jf-J9J-PS f7 ryV-Jdf-M ' fJ /J9-J7-7f N fq 167-Sri-30 JPJ-B/ W zY ASP-595-53 . Alf /Jf-.fff-3W 4:W /J9-JY5-36 /07 /Jf-3f5-.ffi ' /af /Jf-JfJ-49 to /54-dfJ-W Id /Jf-JfJ-I" 4W /Jf-3f3-Q.f EDWARDS STREET r1 /Jf-Jf3-IG ' �►7 /sf-JfJ-so GENQ ' N.A.P. NOT A PART IOD 50 0 n- ' SHEET 4 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 Cm OF HUNTPWC*i BEACH COUNTY OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CAUFORNIA ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT L ELLIS AVENUE W Q ll/ — J HR RCLE OST g RCLE_� W ' F W ryry rn N am CORR N.A.P. AL tJF gRCLE � W Ioo so o Do In Z/O-o/ .]Gw //O-Z/t-eta M //o- ZA-OZ .� //o-Z/Z-07 ?7Jay t[Y //O- Z/Z-00 tX /d7- Zr0-Lit ' I I //o- Z/o-LY .CTf //O--Z/t-/O I talc r� X 177 //O- ZO-06 I. //O- ZAV-09 em mo- Z/t-/G ' I tli //O- Z/O-AP .!M //O-Z/Z-/S — //O-01 P-/7 G +.D LIE W ec -) cito CAV3 3 is 1PC CAW,-) il. .rn tM t/b tal //O- Z//-07 .Mi //O-e13-GY xi it LF //O- Z//-06 tO //O- Z/3-OZ_ 0f //O- Z//-ew .EI! //o- Z/J-as x� sar eae m tll ------ J,pw //O- Per'-/O .ss //o-Z!!-GK es+ -a ear /ir7- Z.t'-// Ito //O- Z/.!-05 xe em Z//-/Z xs eo as W //O-Z//-/d .WZ /R9-Z/J 97 LOT A /¢//o- t/Z-SEE SNEET 5 /io- 2a-oz asLEGEND• /ro- 2/Z-cw +rt /.o- T/J-/Z //O- Z/Z-a5 UNDEVELOPED PARCEL LOCATED IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ICFDI NO.90-1. DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS NOT GRANTED BY THE CITY. PROPERTY WILL HAVE FRONTAGE IYPROV[YENTS CONSTRUCTED WITH CFO FUNDS.PROPERTY WILLSE ll[NED FOR AREA WIDE IMPROVEMENTS ONLY.NOT FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS. ' M.A.P. NOT A PART ' C-5 ' SHEET 6 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 CrN OF HuwnwTON BEACH COUNTY OF ORANCf ' STATE OF CALFOW" ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT W a ,re SEE i l SHEET 6 srs nn-zro-o3 W\ xfo a . , /io-zzo-6Lr GOLDEN WEST STREET Sat W -- //O-21/-AC �j asb Jf7 Jae //O-ZZ/-07 W •spy //o-"/-A4 69 N JSZ //O-ZZ/- ® ® 330 ^ JId //O-ZZ/-/Z JMK //a-ZZ/-/i Joe //O-ZZ/-/a -,M/ -/3 ' 110-2Z/ Aw AV-22/ -/B J17 ro-ZZ/-/Y 35/ 170-ZI/ -d7 JJZ //O-Z21-Z/ ll/-ZZ .SSR /ro—rw-ZJ WZZ/-2de W !3i ' J6J .t�7-ZZZ-GK s6r /iv-2PZ 42F JGJ //o-ZZZ-06 J" /A'7-M'07 . 3" //U-212-4w ' sw JG6 /W-21t-00 JBD -A7 a N.A.P. scs ae� 1� xe /ro-SM -// so abv //0-ZZZ-.v 3-0 dA 370 /M-ZZZ-AL —D sw Sis .w n in ax Stu N.A.P. •� .sta ]71 //O-7PZ-.0 N.A.P. .ram NAP. 3X //O-Zll"-dJ J //O-Zze-P/ 37d /AD-2lt-ze JA //O-ZZL-t3 S Je0 /ro-lr2-to �.gQ $ JW At?-zlr-ZG 3 LEGEND: a¢ //0-2VZ-& /ro-ZZZ-M ' N.A.P. NOT A PART sea /ro-ZZZ-2w ' C-6 SHEET 6 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 CITY OF F UWMTON BEACH COMM OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CALFORNIA HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT cm-/ Aw- //O-OL Nl /.b-AP K✓ //O-ZZ ///-/t0-O7 am W/-//O-Ol ao ///-/t0-4J ' -1 1 ///-/.v-.v .v ai-/20-ov //O-.3Z ///-//a-is W = Q SEE SHEET 7 N ERNEST - AVENUE W W N N 7 ® Q W W A R H W N O O O O W W N a Q ' W W 3 Q Q 0 W W < N LU GARFIELD AVENUE ' SEE SHEET 10 LEGEND: we .a-/m-rS .r. /ii ito-2'! «, ,0-/m-/c .a' /ii-/Zo-zs N.A.P. NOT A PART av ///-aw0 17 itr ///-/CO-25 IllnnII''y •P ///-/m-Ag N P"Kwry is KVE►ORa I0 MENEG FOR FMNTAGE IMPOOreoWs ONLY .Er -/CO- 4w ////t0'2p 100 so C 100 ICuIlOIrtrEA u0 aioEw"uG 4LA //1-/mp —� C-7 ' SHEET 7 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 ' Crff OF HUWrMTON BEACH COUNW OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CALFOW" HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT 07Z-09 QM ///-07Z-/7 -07t-Od om ///-Olt-/�:, QJ3 //1 -07Z-044 4a9 /!/-071-// pg ///-07Z-r0 -07Z-OS -07Z-/J sA9 ///-072-Z3 l ' ELLIS AVENUE 6!G O O O W W O K O N O O � fR F. O sJ7 O I� N ui - 3 � O O O N W W c W G 5� ERNEST AVENUE yr sss 3F z a U) o� a e a- J .0 20 0 40 1 U � GARFIELD AVENUE 71.9SEE SHEET C-8 SHEET 8 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 MY OF HUNnNWON BEACH COMM OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CAUPOW" 1 HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT 1 pVENU ELLIS 1 I I n I U I � w I � H I O � I i1f I 1 air Ly w I w I I asb I 4n I 459 N.A.P.• rIN /.T9-/9/-O/ 057 /59-J//-QS I /39-/9/-OZ eo /"-3//- % N.A.P. p/ /y7-/9/_p.T ♦ /6,9-Jf-07 1 I Ibz ICS2 ,�s+l-/9/-CIO I RiS I /39-J//-09 4w /W-J//-/O W I /.S9-d//-03 av /S9-J//- /Jy-8//-at oGa -v- I a I = I 1 5 . eFtq i 2 i Lam_ N.A.P. NOT A PART N.A P. GARFIELD AVENUE ^-9 SHEET 9 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 Cr Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT V ' SEE SHEET 7 ' GARFIELD AVENUE le ? ® I N A.P. ® I I I I N.A.P. 4"�p 'I/Al\\\ 4'qe ¢ \\ N ru O 197 � 0 W O i Il/j ' 1 O O W H O O N'P J 'a Iss LEGEND: Ile O 'Q• W N' N.A.P. NOT A PART W O W q -- IM LIENED O O ----_------ (CUAM UTTER 0NTA(XWALKEYENT80LT — (CWB.GYTipI NO dDEM�IK) ® JA7 ' �• 41L J,/ CLAY AVENUE 71-71- t sn /ir-A"-A& w /ir---0-x 497 III-I50-44 AN ,W-AV-/7 4w ,rl-/Jo-JD Am .wv-1a/-2W A)7 N/-AV-/B AM ///-/m-YL coo Ate' /v-AV-0 40 ///-/:E7-17 wz A'r-/SO--v A.3 AV-/-W-L/ A/f :3? sAi /Jl�tlV-LY so /ff-tQZ-// A7V N/-/?O-Il aW ///-/.7PJ-JO AK ///-A7i7-if - , /J!-d!/-LP' der /JY'f6t-/1 ffr. ///-/M-W ' C-10 ' SHEET 10 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 CITY OF HUNnWTON BEACH MUfM CIF ORANGE ' STATE OF CA NOW" HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT s� ,,,-vo-as Jw ,r, ao-rs /Ap .Sty Al- -/SIP- JrJ ///-/JO-GL' Jrt A/-/JO-.lt JtI -/•f0-t/ sK H/-/.f0-07 323 ///-/SO-/S Sw ///-/JO-ZL .f7 ,/r-/60-a jCs4pp ///__Av-OY fi7 ai'/Jo-af ka Js /i/-/,7o-PJ u ///-z_ Z s1r Yr,rso-Zr S]1 ///-/✓O-GY A/-/JO-/7 J3C ///-/30-t6 Jdf ///-MO SEE I SHEET 6 GARFIELD AVENUE ' N.A.P. sx ------ N.A.P. ssl � .SJO w JJ7 � JSB F Q R w SI3 ® I JJG N 3tii St/ O I O O W W I yW O I O y I Jco I sci I z w O J Q src O W ® �'p• > W F u iffy! :fN O CIRCLE 1 LEGEND. N.A.P. NOT A PART ' CLAY STREET LBm iOR MONI—.. 11E.W. � SHEET ONLY(C11flDUTTER AND SEMAUO JSI ///No-PJ CAW ///-iKO-I9 stT ///-AV-Pt J!✓ ///-�SrO-,YO sf7 /,!� -i410-,fl6 sx ar-,Ma-LS JGt a/-Aw /W-.77 w 50� Aw ri/-.pro-Z7 544 -toy /ii-Afo-as 4Af C-11 SHEET 11 OF 12 ' COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 ' aff OF HUNTMTON BEACH COMITY OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CALFORNUI ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT Q ' SEE SHEET 10 rs a SEE SHEET 12 "Rc, CLAT �� V M sm N.A.P. i Jn i u i N.A.P. ' z u S P• ' •ORETOWN AVENUE II� ' LEGEND: J.b GYJ- At7-?J N.A.P. NOT A PART J7Z OtJ-Lam-tl C-12 1 SHEET 12 OF 12 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM NO. 93-1 CM OF HUNTINGM SUCH COUNN OF ORANGE ' STATE OF CMFOM" ' HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT ' � ® SEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET B ® h 37O ' SEE SHEET 2 N.A.P. a S°O N.A.P. O SEE SHEET 10 N 600 w0I 0 SEE SHEET 11 SM O tls-/Q/-9S /.f9-em-L/ c5v t.T-/cV 11 ' sx /10-ew-/J //0-Pab-so LEOENR lle ! $1 /.O-LLYJ-JL 37d /moo-a"5 N.A.P. NOT A PAIR JTl //O-AW-Ag d?o /.n-aw-v C-13 TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY ' 570 023-010-25 $474,727 $474,727 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 672 023-010-27 $2,835,498 $2,835,498 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 574 023-181-35 $4,728,444 $4,728,444 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 575 023-181-37 $84,372 $84,372 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 1 110-015-57 $821,573 $755,573 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 3 110-015-59 $352,363 $349,188 S.C.E. 5 110-015-75 $150,462 $150,462 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 4 110-015-77 $2,322,643 $1,866,286 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 576 110-200-13 $298,578 $295,278 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 577 110-200-14 $298,578 $295,278 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 678 110-200-17 $1,468,442 $1,262,092 GARFIELD PARTNERS 679 110-200-18 $375,957 $330,582 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 580 110-200-19 $177,796 $155,109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 581 110-200-20 $177,796 $155,109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 582 110-200-21 $311,145 $310,145 BLASGEN, MICHAEL 583 110-200-22 $401,891 $295,393 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 584 110-200-30 $30,679 $30,679 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 585 110-200-32 $1,558,360 $1,198,090 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-200-32 $1,989,423 $1,989,423 PACIFIC COAST HOMES ' 110-200-32 $3,873,210 $3,873,210 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-200-32 $1,564,955 $1,564,955 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 586 110-200-34 $61,358 $61,358 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 271 110-210-01 $110,840 $107,270 LANDIS, WILLIAM 272 110-210-02 $44,187 $37,999 DAHL, DAVID 273 110-210-03 $25,375 $23,890 NICCOLE, MICHAEL 274 110-210-04 $3,458 $3,458 DAHL, DAVID 275 110-210-06 $33,569 $31,506 SCHUESLER,JOHN 276 110-210-07 $46,687 $43,937 SPELTS, LOUIS 277 110-210-08. $70,030 $65,905 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 278 110-210-09 $350,638 $330,013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 279 110-210-10 $55,577 $53,239 NICCOLE, MICHAEL 286 110-211-06 $17,198 $17,198 WEIR OIL CO. 287 110-211-07 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 288 110-211-08 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 289 110-211-09 $4,300 $4,300 HOWELL, LORA 290 110-211-10 $4,300 $4,300 ESTRADA, IGNACIO 291 110-211-11 $4,300 $4,300 PEREZ, MIGUEL 292 110-211-12 $4,300 $4,300 PEREZ, MIGUEL 293 110-211-13 $4,300 $4,300 WOOD, DENA 294 110-211-14 $4,300 $4,300 PEREZ, MIGUEL 295 110-212-01 $4,300 $4,300 COBB, MARVIN 296 110-212-02 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 297 110-212-03 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 298 110-212-04 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL ' 299 110-212-05 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 300 110-212-06 $4,300 $4,300 KELTER, KEVIN ' D-2 TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 301 110-212-07 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 302 110-212-08 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 303 110-212-09 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 304 110-212-10 $4,300 $4,300 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 305 110-212-11 $4,300 $4,300 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 306 110-212-12 $4,300 $4,300 MAROW, MILTON 307 110-212-14 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 308 110-212-15 $12,899 $12,899 FOLMAR, CECIL 309 110-212-16 $4,300 $4,300 KELTER, KENNETH 310 110-212-17 $4,300 $4,300 MAROW, MILTON 311 110-212-18 $4,300 $4,300 AMARK,JUDY 312 110-212-19 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 313 110-212-20 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR, CECIL 314 110-212-21 $8,599 $8,599 FOLMAR, CECIL 315 110-212-22 $4,300 $4,300 AMARK,JUDY 316 110-213-01 $4,300 $4,300 MAROW, MILTON 317 110-213-02 $4,300 $4,300 BATES, LOREN &VIRGINIA 318 110-213-03 $4,300 $4,300 BEER, KENNETH 319 110-213-04 $4,300 $4,300 CATRON, DELBERT 320 110-213-05 $4,300 $4,300 PARKS,JANN 321 110-213-06 $4,300 $4,300 PARKS, JANN 322 110-213-07 $4,300 $4,300 WALLBANK, ERIK 323 110-213-08 $4,300 $4,300 WALLBANK, ERIK 324 110-213-09 $4,300 $4,300 WALLBANK, ERIK 325 110-213-10 $4,300 $4,300 WALLBANK, ERIK 326 110-213-11 $4,300 $4,300 MAROW, MILTON 327 110-213-12 $4,300 $4,300 BORGHETTI, RONALD 328 110-220-02 $457,351 $325,351 BRINDLE, RONALD 329 110-220-03 . $277,375 $197,375 BRINDLE, RONALD 330 110-220-04 $181,025 $127,873 BRINDLE, RONALD 331 110-220-05 $318,127 $318,127 BRINDLE, RONALD 334 110-221-03 $4,671 $4,671 MAIN,WILLIAM 335 110-221-04 $4,671 $4,671 WALLBANK, ERIK 336 110-221-05 $4,671 $4,671 MITCHELL, PATRICIA 337 110-221-06 $4,671 $4,671 TITLE INSURANCE&TRUST C 338 110-221-07 $4,695 $4,695 BRINDLE, RONALD &EMILY 339 110-221-08 $4,754 $4,754 WALKER, DOROTHY 340 110-221-09 $4,790 $4,790 HARGROVE, ELIZABETH 341 110-221-10 $4,838 $4,838 BRINDLE, RONALD &EMILY 342 110-221-11 $4,886 $4,886 BALIGA, KATHERINE 343 110-221-12 $4,910 $4,910 GRAHAM, DONALD 344 110-221-13 $4,910 $4,910 WALKER, DOROTHY 345 110-221-14 $4,910 $4,910 KELLER, MELVIN 346 110-221-15 $4,910 $4,910 DEUTSCH,WARREN 348 110-221-17 $4,910 $4,910 UNION BANK 349 110-221-18 $4,910 $4,910 MITCHELL,JAMES r °-3 1 TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 350 110-221-19 $4,910 $4,910 PETTITT, MARGARET 351 110-221-20 $4,910 $4,910 BRINDLE, RONALD &EMILY 352 110-221-21 $4,898 $4,898 FORD, JANET 353 110-221-22 $4,838 $4,838 SCOULLER, EMMA 354 110-221-23 $4,790 $4,790 SHERRILL, ROBERT 355 110-221-24 $4,718 $4,718 WALKER, DOROTHY 359 110-222-02 $4,850 $4,850 WOODSON, HIRO 361 110-222-04 $9,820 $9,820 LANG, ROBERT TR 362 110-222-05 $4,910 $4,910 HUBBS, KENNETH 363 110-222-06 $9,820 $9,820 FULLER, LELAND 364 110-222-07 $4,910 $4,910 BUTTERS, LOIS 365 110-222-08 $4,910 $4,910 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 366 110-222-09 $9:820 $9,820 GHODOOSHIM, YOUSEF 367 110-222-10 $19,640 $19,640 BRINDLE, RONALD &EMILY 368 110-222-11 $14,730 $14,730 YOUNG, NORMA 369 110-222-13 $4,910 $4,910 MORTON, HAROLD 370 110-222-14 $4,910 $4,910 SPELTS, LOUIS 374 110-222-18 $4,910 $4,910 TOWNLEY, NELLIE 375 110-222-19 $4,910 $4,910 SMITH, RAYMOND 376 110-222-20 $14,730 $14,730 TSAI,JAMES 377 110-222-21 $4,910 $4,910 POWERS, MARY 378 110-222-22 $4,910 $4,910 KELTER RICHARD 379 110-222-23 $4,910 $4,910 GUSTAFSON, FRANK 380 110-222-24 $4,910 $4,910 D.S. PRODUCTS INC 381 110-222-26 $4,910 $4,910 BORGHETTI, RONALD 382 110-222-27 $4,910 $4,910 BORGHETTI, RONALD 383 110-222-28 $4,671 $4,671 BORGHETTI, RONALD 384 110-222-29 $4,671 $4,671 SAILER, DANIEL 385 110-222-30 $4,671 $4,671 SAILER, DANIEL 587 110-230-12 $2,757,589 $2.428,222 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-230-12 $1,546,467 $1,546,467 PACIFIC COAST HOMES ' 431 111-072-02 $123,534 $123,534 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 432 111-072-03 $14,533 $14,533 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 433 111-072-04 $4,710,529 $4,587,969 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 111-072-04 $1,340,317 $1,224,382 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 111-072-04 $1,889,138 $1,889,138 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 434 111-072-05 $975,287 $915,637 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 111-072-05 $383,417 $329,539 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 435 111-072-07 $367,244 $359,244 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 436 111-072-08 $164,959 $156,959 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 437 111-072-09 $111,014 $108,604 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 438 111-072-10 $426,439 $426,439 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 439 111-072-11 $478,616 $462,116 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 440 111-072-12 $478,616 $462,116 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 441 111-072-14 $472,007 $451,382 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 442 111-072-15 $472,007 $451,382 PACIFIC COAST HOMES TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 443 111-072-17 $126,995 $108,245 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 444 111-072-18 $467,856 $417,028 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 445 111-072-20 $225,406 $178,625 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 111-072-20 $310,716 $263,935 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 446 111-072-21 $483,666 $464,291 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 447 111-072-22 $182,239 $182,239 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 448 111-072-23 $506,144 $506,144 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 386 111-110-01 $133,700 $133,700 GREER, BRUCE 387 111-110-02 $133,700 $133,700 MANDIC, ROBERT 388 111-110-03 $133,700 $133,700 GOETSCH, ELMER 389 111-110-04 $244,349 $244,349 COHN, ALVIN 390 111-110-07 $154,298 $68,400 URBINE, PEARL 391 111-110-10 $41,540 $23,940 DUNK ROBERT 392 111-110-14 $26,558 $23,335 TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER 393 111-110-15 $7,071 $3,087 GALICH,JERRY 395 111-110-18 $258,487 $258,487 MANDIC, ROBERT JR 396 111-110-19 $129,243 $129,243 GREER, RUBY TR 397 111-110-20 $129,155 $128,768 RAMSY, MICHAEL TR 398 111-110-21 $64,622 $64,622 PEDERSEN, A 399 111-110-22 $64,622 $64,622 PEDERSEN, A 402 111-110-32 $139,225 $139,225 COHN, ALVIN 404 111-110-34 $4,610 $4,610 WEAVER &MOLA 407 111-120-01 $133,258 $80,650 S&C OIL CO. 408 111-120-06 $154,504 $135,736 THOMAS, LINDA 409 111-120-07 $157,185 $135,105 THOMAS, LINDA 410 111-120-08 $136,834 $125,959 THOMAS, LINDA 411 111-120-09 $112,430 $102,905 THOMAS,JOHN 412 111-120-11 $90,977 $7,761 LINGLE, HAROLD TR 413 111-120-12 . $48,133 $22,389 LINGLE, HAROLD TR 414 111-120-13 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS,JOHN 415 111-120-14 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS, JOHN 416 111-120-15 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS, JOHN 417 111-120-16 $52,761 $44,761 ARMSTRONG, COLLEEN 418 111-120-17 $26,380 $22,380 THOMAS,JOHN 419 111-120-18 $26,380 $22,380 JOHNSON, CHARLES 420 111-120-19 $26,380 $22,380 THOMAS,JOHN 421 111-120-20 $98,882 $44,162 THOMAS,JOHN 422 111-120-22 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS, LINDA 423 111-120-23 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS, LINDA 424 111-120-24 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS, JOHN 425 111-120-25 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS,JOHN 428 111-120-28 $72,376 $60,988 WEIR OIL CO. 429 111-120-29 $107,882 $107,882 MUNIZ,JOE TR 430 111-120-30 $19,693 $19,443 THOMAS, JOHN 512 111-130-01 $26,369 $22,319 WEIR OIL CO. 513 111-130-02 $39,742 $34,492 WEIR OIL CO. D-5 l TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 514 111-130-05 $1,252 $1,252 ASHBY RICHARD K TR 515 111-130-06 $26,494 $22,994 PETERSEN, HELEN 516 111-130-07 $26,494 $22,994 LINGLE, HAROLD TR 517 111-130-08 $26,494 $22,994 LINGLE, HAROLD TR 518 111-130-09 $52,989 $45,989 WILLIAMS, BOBBIE 519 111-130-10 $26,489 $22,967 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 522 111-130-14 $88,419 $81,669 WILLIAMS, BOBBIE 523 111-130-15 $204,569 $134,969 RENNER, WILVIAN 524 111-130-16 $293,971 $283,096 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 525 111-130-17 $145,747 $134,872 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 526 111-130-18 $165,867 $149,049 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 527 111-130-19 $110,562 $110,562 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 528 111-130-20 $299,405 $298,405 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 529 111-130-21 $67,827 $67,827 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 530 111-130-22 $67,827 $67,827 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 531 111-130-23 $275,934 $275,934 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 532 111-130-24 $137,967 $137,967 WEIR OIL CO. 533 111-130-25 $83,732 $83,732 WEIR, DONALD TR 534 111-130-26 $37,237 $31,987 WEIR OIL CO. 535 111-130-27 $9,221 $9,221 WEIR OIL CO INC. 537 111-140-01 $88,446 $39,678 TELFORD, LORAYNE 538 111-140-02 $13,092 $11,342 WEIR, DONALD TR 539 111-140-04 $26,183 $22,683 WEAVER &MOLA 540 111-140-05 $26,183 $22,683 WEAVER & MOLA 541 111-140-06 $52,367 $45,367 WEAVER&MOLA 542 111-140-07 $52,367 $45,367 LINGLE, HAROLD TR 543 111-140-08 $26,183 $22,683 WEAVER&MOLA 544 111-140-09 $26,070 $22,020 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 546 111-140-14 $149,824 $149,824 URBINE, PEARL 547 111-140-15 $140,095 $140,095 ALBERT, WILMA 548 111-140-16 $140,095 $140,095 DABNEY,WALTER 549 111-140-18 $121,724 $121,724 JONES, DAGMAR 551 111-140-20 $26,278 $26,278 MOLA DEV. CORP 552 111-140-21 $65,467 $65,467 MOLA DEV. CORP 553 111-140-22 $39,643 $39,643 MOLA DEV. CORP 554 111-140-23 $131,388 $131,388 DENSLOW, MARIBELLE 555 111-140-24 $131,388 $131,388 PEDERSEN, A.M. 556 111-140-25 $131,388 $131,388 WEAVER, CARL 557 111-140-26 $46,514 $46,514 LEVOY, BERTRAM 558 111-140-27 $33,225 $33,225 LEVOY, BERTRAM 559 111-140-28 $41,176 $41,176 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 560 111-140-29 $41,176 $41,176 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 561 111-140-30 $33,914 $33,914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 562 111-140-31 $33,914 $33,914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 563 111-140-32 $290,948 $290,948 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 564 111-140-33 $253,330 $253,330 PACIFIC COAST HOMES D-6 TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 565 111-140-34 $30,431 $30,431 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 566 111-140-35 $91,293 $91,293 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 567 111-140-36 $13,092 $11,342 WEIR, DONALD TR 568 111-140-37 $26,183 $22,683 WEIR, DONALD TR r 472 111-150-15 $118,072 $86,072 GOWDY, ROBERT 473 111-150-16 $118,072 $86,072 GOWDY, ROBERT 474 111-150-17 $235,151 $171,151 SCOTT, WILLIAM 475 111-150-18 $119,371 $113,191 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 476 111-150-19 $79,322 $74,594 ARLINE, ROBRECHT 477 111-150-20 $68,616 $63,888 ARLINE, ROBRECHT 478 111-150-21 $82,488 $50,152 ATKINSON, FRANK&DONNA 479 111-150-22 $26,603 $22,718 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 480 111-150-23 $24,750 $18,605 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 483 111-150-26 $65,426 $54,658 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 484 111-150-27 $58,192 $58,192 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 485 111-150-28 $117,772 $117,772 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 486 111-150-29 $65,002 $65,002 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 487 111-150-30 $70,536 $70,536 SANTIAGO, JACK TR 488 111-150-31 $58,306 $58,306 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 489 111-150-32 $48,175 $48,175 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 490 111-150-33 $51,433 $51,433 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 491 111-150-34 $22,581 $22,581 KELLER, MELVIN 492 111-150-36 $41,085 $41,085 BROWN,JAMES 493 111-150-37 $49,599 $49,599 KELLER, MELVIN 494 111-150-38 $63,007 $63,007 WORTHY, ROLAND 495 111-150-39 $70,962 $70,962 WEIR OIL CO. 496 111-150-40 $92,377 $85,652 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 497 111-150-44 $94,122 $94,122 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 500 111-150-47. $6,874 $3,761 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 1 449 159-191-01 $247,153 $244,370 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 450 159-191-02 $207,988 $202,718 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 451 159-191-03 $195,280 $183,903 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 452 159-191-04 $194,977 $183,182 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 502 159-281-01 $36,632 $31,574 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 503 159-281-02 $106,729 $101,729 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 504 159-281-03 $26,607 $15,103 HASSETT, GLORIA 506 159-281-05 $103,098 $100,316 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 510 159-282-11 $234,032 $234,032 WILLIAMS, SCOTT 511 159-282-12 $33,999 $33,999 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 454 159-311-02 $1,251,078 $1,251,078 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 159-311-02 $887,830 $887,796 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. ' 159-311-02 $761,374 $761,361 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 455 159-311-03 $290,668 $290,668 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 456 159-311-04 $21,800 $21,800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 457 159-311-05 $21,800 $21,800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 458 159-311-06 $29,066 $29,066 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 0-7 TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY 459 159-311-07 $36,333 $36,333 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 462 159-311-10 $28,951 $28,951 ESPITIA, ALBERT 463 159-311-11 $38,601 $38,601 BRUNO, JOE 464 159-311-12 $87,455 $87,455 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 70 159-393-01 $53,283 $53,283 PACIFIC AMERICAN OIL CO 71 159-393-02 $2,555 $2,555 FJAERAN, RAND[ 72' 159-393-03 $2,555 $2,555 GOODING, FRED 73 159-393-04 $5,110 $5,110 LINDESY, MARGARET 76 159-393-07 $2,555 $2,555 PHILLIPS, ORRIN 78 159-393-09 $2,555 $2,555 KOVNER, BARBARA 79 159-393-10 $2,555 $2,555 PHILLIPS, ORRIN 82 159-393-13 $3,490 $3,490 MC KENZIE, CHARLES 83 159-393-14 $3,490 $3,490 LANG, H. A. 84 159-393-15 $3,490 $3,490 MORTON, HAROLD 85 159-393-16 $6,980 $6,980 MAROW, MILTON 86 159-393-17 $3,490 $3,490 HANKS, HEBER 87 159-393-18 $3,490 $3,490 LIAO, DANIEL 88 159-393-19 $6,980 $6,980 LINDESY, MARGARET 90 159-393-21 $3,490 $3,490 FJAERAN, RANDI 91 159-393-22 $3,490 $3,490 WOOLPERT, DUANE 92 159-393-23 $6,980 $6,980 MARTINSON, DON 94 159-393-25 $3,490 $3,490 OLIVER, TED 97 159-393-28 $3,490 - $3,490 QUINE, CHRISTOPHER 98 159-393-29 $3,490 $3,490 ENENBACH, HUGO 99 159-393-30 $3,490 $3,490 GUTHRIE, LAURA 100 159-393-31 $3,490 $3,490 TAYLOR, MICHAEL 102 159-393-33 $3,490 $3,490 CARMICHAEL, GEORGE 103 159-393-34 $3,490 $3,490 SWARTZ, THELMA 105 159-393-36 . $10,470 $10,470 MAROW, MILTON 107 159-393-38 $3,490 $3,490 ADLER, KENNETH 109 159-393-40 $3,490 $3,490 DAVIS, MICHAEL 110 159-393-41 $3,490 $3,490 MAYER, RICHARD 113 159-393-44 $3,490 $3,490 MAROW, MILTON 114 159-393-45 $3,490 $3,490 ADLER, KENNETH 115 159-393-46 $3,490 $3,490 DAVIS, MICHAEL 116 159-393-47 $3,490 $3,490 BOUSKA,WILLIAM 117 159-393-48 $3,490 $3,490 MORTON, HAROLD 119 159-393-50 $6,980 $6,980 MORTON, HAROLD ---------------- ----------------- --------�____���----- $60,836,474 $57,280,519 r. r D- i TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHTOF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAY 570 023-010-26 $311,480 $0 $0 $128,483 $0 $33,984 $780 $474,727 $474.727 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 572 023-010-27 $1,798,235 $0 $0 $816.608 $0 $215,994 $4,681 $2.835.498 $2.835.498 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 674 023-181-35 $3,132.406 $0 $0 $1,189,840 $0 $398.425 $7.772 $4.728.444 $4.728.444 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 575 023-181-37 $55.893 $0 $0 $21,231 $0 $7,109 $139 $84,372 $84,372 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 1 110-015-57 $470,399 $88,000 $0 $232.385 $0 $51,437 $1,350 $821,573 $755.673 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 3 110-015-59 $217,875 $3,175 $0 $107.041 $0 $23,693 $579 $352,363 $349.188 S.C.E. 5 110-015-75 $117,080 $0 $1,380 $24,495 $0 $7,260 $247 $150.462 $150.462 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 4 110-015-77 $1.169,200 $456.358 $38,910 $537.406 $0 $118,952 $3,818 $2.322,643 $1,866.286 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 576 110-200-13 $180,826 $3.300 $0 $88,395 $0 $19.566 $491 $298.578 $295,278 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 577 110-200-14 $186,826 $3,300 $0 $88,395 $0 $19.566 $491 $298,578 $295.278 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 578 110-200-17 $718.157 $206.350 $154.621 $303.731 $15.940 $67,230 $2,414 $1,468,442 $1,262,092 GARFIELD PARTNERS 579 110-200-18 $178,772 $45,375 $43,170 $84.801 $4,450 $18.770 $618 $375,957 $330.582 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 580 110-200-19 $85,405 $22,688 $20.420 $40.113 $0 $8,879 $29' $177.796 $155.109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 581 110-200-20 $85,405 $22.688 $20,420 $40.113 $0 $8,879 $292 $177.796 $155,109 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 582 110-200-21 $170.810 $1.000 $40,841 $80.226 $0 $17,758 $511 $311,145 $310,145 BLASGEN,MICHAEL 583 110-200-22 $209.196 $106,498 $6.582 $84.645 $0 $14,309 $561 $401.891 $295.393 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 584 110-200-M $15,129 $0 $4,426 $8.694 $456 $1.924 $50 $30.679 $30,679 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 585 110-200-M $903.781 $380,270 $75.028 $138.793 $9.866 $68,059 $2.562 $1,558,360 $1.198.090 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-200-32 $1,299,430 $0 $101,228 $411,804 $19.881 $164.009 $3,270 $1,989,423 $1,989.423 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-200-32 $2,267.556 $0 $293.563 $973,079 $44,225 $288.421 $8.367 $3.873,210 $3,873,210 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-200-32 $921.833 $0 $180.630 $350,157 $12,510 $117,252 $2.572 $1,564.955 $1,564,955 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 566 110-200-U $30,258 $0 $8.851 $17,387 $912 $3,849 $101 $81,358 $61.358 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 271 110-210-01 $0 $3.670 $36,125 $70.962 $0 $0 $182 $110.840 $107.270 LANDIS,WILLIAM 272 110-210-02 $0 $8,188 $12,794 $25,133 $0 $0 $73 $44,187 $37.999 DAHL,DAVID 273 110-210-03 $13.003 $1,485 $3.014 $5,921 $0 $1.310 $42 $25,375 $23.890 NICCOLE,MICHAEL 274 110-210-04 $0 $0 $1,165 $2,298 $0 $0 $6 $3,458 $3,458 DAHL,DAVID 275 110-210-M $17,415 $2,063 $4,129 $8.111 $0 $1,795 $55 $33,569 $31.506 SCHUESLER,JOHN 276 110-210-07 $23.221 $2.750 $5,506 $10,815 $1.925 $2,394 $77 $46,687 $43.937 SPELTS,LOUIS 277 110-210-08 $34.831 $4,125 $8,258 $16.223 $2,888 $3.591 $115 $70,030 $65,905 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 278 110-210-09 $174,385 $20.825 $41,380 $81.246 $14.462 $17,983 $576 $350,638 $330.013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 279 110-210-10 $29.391 $2.338 $8,989 $13,729 $0 $3,039 $91 $55.577 $53.239 NICCOLE,MICHAEL 288 110-211-08 $8,189 $0 $2.398 $4.706 $838 $1,042 $28 $17.198 $17,198 WEIR OIL CO. 287 110-211-07 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.170 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 WEIR OIL CO. 288 110-211-08 $2.047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 289 110-211-M $2.047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 HOWELL.LORA 290 110-211-10 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $280 $7 $4.300 $4.300 ESTRADA.IGNACIO 291 110-211-11 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $280 $7 $4,300 $4.300 PEREZ.MIGUEL 292 110-211-12 $2.047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $280 $7 $4.300 $4,300 PEREZ.MIGUEL 293 110-211-13 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $200 $7 $4.300 $4,300 WOOD,DENA 294 110-211-14 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 PEREZ,MIGUEL 295 110-212-01 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 COBB.MARVIN 296 110-212-02 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $280 $7 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR,CECIL 297 110-212-03 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $280 $7 $4.300 $4,300 FOLMAR,CECIL 298 110-212-04 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 FOLMAR,CECIL 299 110-212-05 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 FOLMAR,CECIL E-2 � �► �► r err � � � � at. � -� � ter: � <a� � � rir TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHTOF-WAYRIGHTOF-WAY 300 110-212-M $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 KELTER,KEVIN 301 110-212-07 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $200 $7 $4.300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 302 110-212-08 $2.047 $0 $599 $1.178 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4.300 WEIR OIL CO. 303 110-212-09 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,170 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 WEIR OIL CO. 304 110-212-10 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 GHODOOSHIM,YOUSEF 305 110-212-11 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4.300 GHODOOSHIM,YOUSEF 306 110-212-12 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 MAROW,MILTON 307 110-212-14 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $280 $7 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR.CECIL 308 110-212-15 $8.142 $0 $1,797 $3,529 $628 $781 $21 $12,899 $12.899 FOLMAR.CECIL 309 110-212-18 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4.300 KELTER.KENNETH 310 110-212-17 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 MAROW,MILTON 311 110-212-18 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,170 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 AMARK,JUDY 312 110-212-19 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 FOLMAR,CECIL 313 110-212-20 $2,047 50 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 FOLMAR.CECIL 314 110-212-21 $4.096 $0 $1,198 $2,353 $419 $521 $14_ $8,599 $8,599 FOLMAR.CECIL 315 110-212-22 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $280 $7 $4,300 $4,300 AMARK,JUDY 316 110-213-01 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 MAROW,MILTON 317 110-213-02 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 BATES,LOREN&VIRGINIA 318 110-213-03 $2,047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 BEER,KENNETH 319 110-213-04 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 CATRON,DELBERT 320 110-213-05 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 PARKS,JANN 321 110-213-06 $2.047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 PARKS,JANN 322 110-213-07 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4,300 WALLBANK,ERIK 323 110-213-08 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 WALLBANK,ERIK 324 110-213-09 $2.047 $0 $599 $1,176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 WALLBANK,ERIK 325 110-213-10 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4.300 WALLBANK,ERIK 326 110-213-11 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4,300 $4,300 MAROW.MILTON 327 110-213-12 $2,047 $0 $599 $1.176 $209 $260 $7 $4.300 $4.300 BORGHETTI,RONALD 328 110-220-02 $179,211 $132,000 $42.772 $94,019 $0 $18,597 $752 $457.351 $325.351 BRINDLE,RONALD 329 110-220-03 $108,709 $80,000 $25,950 $50,976 50 $11,283 $456 $277.375 $197,375 BRINDLE,RONALD 330 110-220-04 $70,449 $53,152 $16,800 $33,013 $0 $7.307 $298 $181,025 $127,873 BRINDLE,RONALD 331 110-220-05 $159.250 $0 $48.586 $91,512 $0 $20,256 $523 $318,127 $318.127 BRINDLE,RONALD 334 110-221-03 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $0 $297 $8 $4,671 $4.671 MAIN,WILLIAM 335 110-221-04 $2.338 $0 $084 $1,344 $0 $297 $8 $4,671 $4,671 WALLBANK,ERIK 338 110-221-05 $2.338 $0 $684 $1.344 $0 $297 $8 _ $4,671 $4.671 MITCHELL.PATRICIA 337 110-221-06 $2,338 $0 $564 $1,344 $0 $297 $8 $4,671 $4,671 TITLE INSURANCE&TRUST C 338 110-221-07 $2.338 $0 $664 $1,344 $24 $297 $8 $4.696 $4,095 BRINDLE,RONALD A EMILY 339 110-221-08 $2,338 50 $684 $1,344 584 $297 $8 $4.754 $4,754 WALKER,DOROTHY 340 110-221-09 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $120 $297 $8 $4,790 $4.790 HARGROVE,ELIZABETH 341 110-221-10 $2,338 $0 $584 $1,344 $167 $297 $8 $4.838 $4,838 BRINDLE,RONALD&EMILY 342 110-221-11 $2.338 $0 $584 $1,344 $216 $297 $8 $4,886 $4,886 BALIGA,KATHERINE 343 110-221-12 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 GRAHAM.DONALD 344 110-221-13 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4.910 WALKER,DOROTHY 345 110-221-14 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4,910 KELLER.MELVIN 346 110-221-15 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4.910 DEUTSCH.WARREN E-3 TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE 3 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAY 348 110-221-17 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 UNION BANK 349 110-221-18 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 MITCHELL.JAMES 350 110-221-19 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4.910 PETTITT,MARGARET 351 110-221-20 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4.910 BRINDLE,RONALD&EMILY 362 110-221-21 $2.338 $0 $584 $1,344 $227 $297 $8 $4,898 $4.898 FORD,JANET 353 110-221-22 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $167 $297 $8 $4,838 $4,838 SCOULLER,EMMA 354 110-221-23 $2,338 $0 $684 $1,344 $120 $297 $8 $4,790 $4.790 SHERRILL.ROBERT 355 110-221-24 $2,338 $0 $584 $1.344 $48 $297 $11 $4,718 $4.718 WALKER,DOROTHY 359 110-222-02 $2,338 $0 $684 $1.344 $179 $297 $8 $4,850 $4,850 WOODSON,HIRO 361 110-222-04 $4.676 $0 $1,368 $2.687 $478 $595 $16 $9,820 $9,820 LANG,ROBERT TR 362 110-222-05 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4.910 HUBBS,KENNETH 363 110-222-06 $4,676 $0 $1,368 $2.687 $478 $595 $16 $9,820 $9,820 FULLER,LELAND 364 110-222-07 $2,338 $0 $684 $1.344 $239 $297 $. $4.910 $4,910 BUTTERS,LOIS 365 110-222-08 $2,338 $0- $684 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 GHODOOSHIM,YOUSEF 366 110-222-09 $4,676 $0 $1,368 $2,687 $478 $595 $16 $9.820 $9.820 GHODOOSHIM,YOUSEF 367 110-222-10 $9.352 $0 $2.736 $5,374 $967 $1,190 $32 $19.640 $19,640 BRINDLE,RONALD✓L EMILY 368 110-222-11 $7.014 $0 $2,052 $4,031 $717 $892 $24 $14,730 $14.730 YOUNG,NORMA 369 110-222-13 $2,338 $0 $684 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4.910 MORTON,HAROLD 370 110-222-14 $2,339 $0 $884 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 SPELTS,LOUIS 374 110-222-18 $2,338 $0 $684 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 TOWNLEY,NELLIE 375 110-222-19 $2.338 $0 $684 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4.910 SMITH,RAYMOND 376 110-222-20 $7,014 $0 $2,052 $4.031 $717 $892 $24 $14,730 $14,730 TSAI.JAMES 377 110-222-21 $2.338 $0 $884 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4.910 POWERS.MARY 378 110-222-22 $2.338 $0 $584 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4.910 KELTER RICHARD 379 110-222-23 $2.338 $0 $884 $1,344 $230 $297 $8 $4.910 $4,910 GUSTAFSON,FRANK 380 110-222-24 $2,338 $0 $884 $1,344 $230 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 D.S.PRODUCTS INC 381 110-222-26 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $239 $297 $8 $4,910 $4,910 BORGHETTI,RONALD 382 110-222-27 $2.338 $0 $584 $1.344 $239 $297 $8 $4.910 $4,910 BORGHETTI,RONALD 383 110-222-28 $2.338 $0 $684 $1.344 S0 $297 $8 $4,671 $4,671 BORGHETTI.RONALD 384 110-222-29 $2.338 $0 $684 $1,344 $0 $297 $8 $4,671 $4,671 SAILER,DANIEL 385 110-222-M $2.338 $0 $884 $1.344 $0 $297 $8 $4.671 $4,671 SAILER,DANIEL 587 110-230-12 $1,575,840 $329,368 $21,549 $637,534 $0 $188,965 $4.533 $2.757.589 $2,428,222 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 110-230-12 $1.011,371 $0 $19,745 $384.168 $0 $128,641 $2,542 $1,546.467 $1,546,467 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 431 111-072-02 $88,463 $0 $10.123 $28,521 $9,770 $8.454 $203 $123,634 $123.534 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 432 111-072-03 $7.819 $0 $1.191 $3.355 $1,149 $995 $24 $14,533 $14,533 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 433 111-072-04 $2.651.466 $122,560 $377,339 $1.063.158 $273.143 $315,120 $7.743 $4.710.529 $4,587.989 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 111-072-04 $726.249 $115,935 $126,928 $235.186 $50.344 $83,471 $2.203 $1.340.317 $1.224.382 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 111-072-04 $1,180.487 $0 $107,183 $370.624 $100,131 $147.008 $3.105 $1.889.138 $1.889,138 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 434 111-072-05 $521.180 $59,850 $89.934 $197.040 $67,497 $58,403 $1.803 $975,287 $915,637 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 111-072-05 $209,210 $53,877 $29,633 $54,907 $15,671 $19,487 $630 $383,417 $329,539 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 435 111-072-07 $208,357 $8.000 $37,205 $88,937 $19,678 $24,467 $604 $367,244 $359,244 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 436 111-072-08 $94,982 $8,000 $15,276 $28,305 $8.079 $10,046 $271 $164.959 $158.959 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 437 111-072-09 $82,622 $2,410 $11,338 $21.009 $5.996 $7,456 $182 $111.014 $108.804 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 438 111-072-10 $239.007 $0 $46,227 $85.655 $24.447 $30,400 $701 $426,439 $426,439 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 439 111-072-11 $273.462 $10,500 $48.509 $86,177 $24.596 $30,585 $787 $478.616 $462.116 PACIFIC COAST HOMES E-4 TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE 6 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAY 440 111-072-12 $273,462 $16.500 $46.509 $80,177 $24.5% $30,585 $787 $478.616 $462.116 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 441 111-072-14 $267,442 $20,625 $46,344 $84,019 $23,980 $29,820 $776 $472.007 $451.382 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 442 111-072-15 $267.442 $20,625 $45.344 $84,019 $23,980 $29,820 $776 $472,007 $451.382 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 443 111-072-17 $73,809 $18,750 $8,473 $15,700. $4,481 $5,572 $209 $126.995 $108,245 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 444 111-072-18 $281.318 $50.828 $38,358 $71.073 $20.285 $25,225 $769 $467,856 $417,028 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 445 111-072-20 $112.881 $46.781 $11,676 $32.897 $11,269 $9,751 $371 $225.406 $178.625 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 111-072-20 $163,075 $46,781 $24.694 $45,756 $13,059 $16.240 $511 $310,716 $263.935 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 446 111-072-21 $201,520 $19,375 $50,002 $92.648 $26,443 $32,882 $795 $483,666 $464.291 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 447 111-072-22 $102.140 $0 $19.756 $38,805 $10.448 $12.992 $300 $182,239 $182,239 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 448 111-072-23 $285.868 $0 $39,062 $110,059 $37,701 $32,621 $832 $506,144 $506,144 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 386 111-110-01 $57.251 $0 $12,592 $56,355 $0 $7.282 $220 $133.700 $133.700 GREER,BRUCE 387 111-110-02 $57,251 $0 $12,592 $58,355 $0 $7,282 $220 $133,700 $133,700 MANDIC.ROBERT 388 111-110-03 $57,251 $0 $12,592 $56,355 $0 $7,282 $22C $133.700 $133,700 GOETSCH.ELMER 389 111-110-04 $104,631 $0 $23,014 $102,993 $0 $13.309 $402 $244,349 $244,349 COHN.ALVIN 390 111-110-07 $37,795 $85,898 $5,014 $22,438 $0 $2,899 $254 $154.298 $68,400 URSINE,PEARL 391 111-110-10 $13,094 $17,600 $1.780 $7.967 $0 $1,030 $68 $41,540 $23,940 DUNK ROBERT 392 111-110-14 $12.845 $3,223 $1.726 $7,723 $0 $998 $44 $26,558 $23,335 TAYLOR.CHRISTOPHER 393 111-110-15 $3,075 $3,984 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12 $7,071 $3,087 GALICH,JERRY 395 111-110-18 $110,696 $0 $24,345 $108.952 $0 $14,079 $425 $258,487 $258,487 MANDIC,ROBERT JR 396 111-110-19 $55,343 $0 $12.173 $54,476 $0 $7,039 $212 $129,243 $129,243 GREER,RUBY TR 397 111-110-20 $55,139 $388 $12.128 $54.275 $0 $7,013 $212 $129,155 $128,768 RAMSY.MICHAEL TR 398 111-110-21 $27.671 $0 $6,086 $27,238 $0 $3,520 $106 $64,622 $84,622 PEDERSEN,A 399 111-110-22 $27.671 $0 $8.086 $27,238 $0 $3,620 $100 $64,622 $64.622 PEDERSEN,A 402 111-110-U $61,716 $0 $12,766 $57,132 $0 $7.382 $229 $139,225 $139,225 COHN.ALVIN 404 111-110-34 $1,974 $0 $434 $1,943 $0 $251 $8 $4.610 $4,610 WEAVER 8 MOLA 407 111-120-01 $50.921 $52.608 $7,306 $13,636 $3.864 $4,804 $219 $133,258 $80,650 S 3 C OIL CO. 408 111-120-06 $80.391 $18.768 $11,413 $51,078 $0 $8.000 $254 $154,504 $135,736 THOMAS,LINDA 409 111-120-07 $60.118 $22,080 $11,353 $50,810 $0 $6,566 $258 $157,185 $135.105 THOMAS.LINDA 410 111-120-08 $62,209 $10.875 $10,494 $46,962 $0 $6,068 $225 $136,834 $125,959 THOMAS.LINDA 411 111-120-09 $52.338 $9,525 $8,323 $37,246 $0 $4,813 $185 $112,430 $102,905 THOMAS.JOHN 412 111-120-11 $0,120 $83.216 $246 $1.102 $0 $142 $150 $90,977 $7,761 LINGLE.HAROLD TR 413 111-120-12 $12,424 $25,744 $1.633 $7,308 $0 $944 $79 $48.133 $22,389 LINGLE.HAROLD TR 414 111-120-13 $12,436 $25.600 $1.638 $7,320 $0 $946 $79 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS.JOHN 415 111-120-14 $12,436 $25,600 $1.638 $7,320 $0 $946 $79 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS,JOHN 416 111-120-15 $12,438 $25,600 $1.636 $7,320 $0 $946 $79 $48,016 $22,416 THOMAS.JOHN 417 111-120-16 $24.872 $8,000 $3.271 $14.639 $0 $1.892 $87 $52,761 $44,761 ARMSTRONG,COLLEEN 418 111-120-17 $12.436 $4.000 VAN $7.320 $0 $948 $43 $26,380 $22,380 THOMAS,JOHN 419 111=120-18 $12,436 $4.000 $1,636 $7.320 $0 $946 $43 $26,380 $22,380 JOHNSON.CHARLES 420 111-120-19 $12,438 $4,000 $1.636 $7,320 $0 $946 $43 $26,380 $22,380 THOMAS,JOHN 421 111-120-20 $24,583 $54.720 $3,207 $14,354 $0 $1,855 $183 $98,882 $44,182 THOMAS,JOHN 422 111-120-22 $67,251 $0 $12,692 $56,355 $0 $7.282 $220 $133,700 $133;700 THOMAS.LINDA 423 111-120-23 $57,251 $0 $12.592 $56.355 $0 $7,282 $220 $133,700 $133.700 THOMAS,LINDA 424 111-120-24 $57,261 $0 $12.592 $66.355 $0 $7.282 $220 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS,JOHN 425 111-120-25 $57,251 $0 $12,592 $56.355 $0 $7,282 $220 $133,700 $133,700 THOMAS,JOHN 428 111-120-28 $39,939 $11,388 $5.181 $9,601 $2,740 $3,407 $119 $72,376 $60,988 WEIR OIL CO. E-5 TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE 8 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAY 429 111-120-29 $46,198 $0 $10,161 $45,472 $0 $5,876 $177 $107.882 $107,882 MUNIZ,JOE TR 430 111-120-M $8,897 $250 $1,737 $7.773 $0 $1,004 $32 $19,693 $19.443 THOMAS.JOHN 512 111-130-01 $12.410 $4.050 $1.630 $7.294 SO $942 $43 $26.369 $22,319 WEIR OIL CO. 513 111-130-02 $19,049 $5,250 $2.540 $11,368 $0 $1,469 $85 $39,742 $34,492 WEIR OIL CO. 614 111-130-05 $1,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2 $1,252 $1,252 ASHBY RICHARD K TR 515 111-130-08 $12,699 $3,500 $1.693 $7,579 $0 $979 $44 $26,494 $22,994 PETERSEN,HELEN 616 111-130-07 $12,699 $3.500 $1,693 $7.579 $0 $979 $44 $26,494 $22,994 LINGLE,HAROLD TR 517 111-130-08 $12.699 $3,500 $1.693 $7.579 $0 $979 $44 $26.494 $22,994 LINGLE.HAROLD TR 518 111-130-09 $25.399 $7,000 $3,387 $15.157 $0 $1,959 $87 $52.989 $45,989 WILLIAMS,BOBBIE 519 111-130-10 $12,687 $3,523 $1.691 $7.567 $0 $978 $44 $26.489 $22,967 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 522 111-130-14 $39.992 $6,750 $6.861 $30.704 $0 $3,967 $145 $88,419 $81,669 WILLIAMS,BOBBIE 523 111-130-15 $58,020 $89,600 $11.333 $50,719 $0 $6.554 $336 $204,569 $134,969 RENNER.WILVIAN 524 111-130-16 $137.777 $10.875 $23,926 $107,074 $0 $13,836 548.E $293,971 $283.098 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 525 111-130-17 $66.026 $10,875 $11,333 $50.719 $0 $0,564 $240 $145,747 $134,872 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 526 111-130-18 $94,044 $16,818 $9.139 $36.056 $0 $9.537 $273 $165,867 $149,049 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 527 111-130-19 $63.370 $0 $6,308 $30.474 $2.169 $8.080 $182 $110,562 $110,562 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 528 111-130-20 $171,033 $0 $17,026 $82.247 $5.854 $21,755 $491 $298.405 $298.405 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 529 111-130-21 $28,626 $0 $5.142 $28,177 $2.130 $3,641 $111 $87,827 $67,827 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 530 111-130-22 $28.626 $0 $5,142 $28.177 $2.130 $3.641 $111 $67.827 $67.827 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 531 111-130-23 $114,502 $0 $25,185 $112.709 $8.619 $14,564 $454 $275,934 $275,934 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 532 111-130-24 $57.251 $0 $12,592 $56.355 $4.280 $7,282 $227 $137.967 $137,967 WEIR OIL CO. 533 111-130-25 $34,748 $0 $7.642 $34.201 $2.585 $4,419 $138 $93.732 $83,732 WEIR,DONALD TR 534 111-130-28 $16,549 $5.250 $2.540 $11.368 $0 $1,489 $61 $37,237 $31,987 WEIR OIL CO. 535 111-130-27 $3,948 $0 $868 $3,887 $0 $502 $15 $9,221 $9,221 WEIROILCOINC. 537 111-140-01 $20.072 $48.768 $2.707 $14.836 $0 $1.917 $145 $88.446 $39.678 TELFORD,LORAYNE 538 111-140-02 $8,360 $1,750 5692 $3.789 $0 $490 $22 $13.092 $11,342 WEIR,DONALD TR 539 111-140-04 $12.699 $3,500 $1,393 $7.579 $0 $979 $43 $26.183 $22,683 WEAVER&MOLA 540 111-140-05 $12.699 $3,500 $1.383 $7,579 $0 $979 $43 $26,193 $22.693 WEAVER 8 MOLA 541 111-140-06 $25.399 $7.000 $2.780 $15.157 $0 $1.959 $86 $52,367 $45,367 WEAVER&MOLA 542 111-140-07 $25,399 $7.000 $2.706 $15.157 $0 $1,959 $80 $52,367 $45,367 LINGLE,HAROLD TR 543 111-140-08 $12,699 $3,500 $1.383 $7,579 $0 $979 $43 $26.183 $22.683 WEAVER 8 MOLA 544 111-140-09 $12,410 $4,050 $1.331 $7,294 50 $942 $43 $26,070 $22,020 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY 548 111-140-14 $92.584 $0 $9,713 $33.508 $3.841 $9,932 $240 $149,824 $149.824 URBINE,PEARL 547 111-140-16 $92,584 $0 $0 $33,508 $3,941 $9.932 $230 $140,095 $140,095 ALBERT.WILMA 548 111-140-16 $92.584 $0 $0 $33,508 $3.841 $9,932 $230 $140,095 $140,095 DABNEY.WALTER 549 111-140-18 $78.084 $0 $0 $33.508 $0 $9,932 $200 $121.724 $121,724 JONES,DAGMAR 551 111-140-20 $11,450 $0 $2,067 $11.271 $0 $1,466 $43 $26,278 $26,278 MOLA DEV.CORP 652 111-140-21 $28,527 $0 $5,124 $28.080 $0 $3,628 $108 $55,467 $65,467 MOLA DEV.CORP 553 111-140-22 $17.274 $0 $3.103 $17.004 $0 $2.197 $65 $39,643 $39.643 MOLA DEV.CORP 554 111-140-23 $57.251 $0 $10.284 $56,355 $0 $7.282 $216 $131,388 $131,388 DENSLOW,MARIBELLE 555 111-140-24 $57.251 $0 $10,294 $56,355 $0 $7,282 $216 $131,398 $131.388 PEDERSEN,A.M. 556 111-140-25 $57,251 $0 $10,284 $56,355 $0 $7.282 $218 $131.398 $131,388 WEAVER,CARL 557 111-140-20 $20,268 $0 $3,641 $19,951 $0 $2.578 $78 $46,514 $46.514 LEVOY,BERTRAM 558 111-140-27 $14,477 $0 $2,601 $14,251 $0 $1,841 $55 $33.225 $33,225 LEVOY.BERTRAM 559 111-140-28 $21.563 $0 $2,571 $14,089 $1.065 $1.821 $88 $41.176 $41,176 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. E-6 TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA . WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHTOF-WAY 560 111-140-29 $21,563 $0 $2,571 $14,089 $1.065 $1,821 $88 $41,176 $41,176 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 561 111-140-M $14,313 $0 $2.571 $14,089 $1,065 $1.821 $56 $33,914 $33,914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 562 111-140-31 $14.313 $0 $2,571 $14.089 $1,065 $1.821 $58 $33,914 $33,914 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 563 111-140-M $148,768 $0 $18.640 $102,143 $7,721 $13.199 $478 $290,948 $290.948 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 564 111-140-33 $111,994 $0 $18,637 $101,578 $7.678 $13.126 $416 $253.330 $253,330 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 565 111-140-34 $19.521 $0 $O $8.377 $0 $2,483 $50 $30,431 $30.431 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 566 111-140-35 $58,563 $0 $O $25,131 $O $7,449 $150 $91,293 $91.293 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 567 111-140-08 $8.350 $1.750 $692 $3.789 $O $490 $22 $13,092 $11,342 WEIR,DONALD TR 568 111-140-37 $12,699 $3,500 $1,383 $7.579 $O $979 $43 $26.183 $22,683 WEIR,DONALD TR 472 111-150-15 $50.261 $32.000 $7.655 $21,589 $O $8.393 $194 $118.072 $88.072 GOWDY,ROBERT 473 111-160-10 $50.261 $32,000 $7.655 $21,569 $0 $6.393 $194 $118,072 $86,072 GOWDY,ROBERT 474 111-150-17 $99,942 $64,000 $15,222 $42.888 $O $12.712 $387 $235,151 $171,151 SCOTT.WILLIAM 475 111-150-18 $71,258 $8,180 $8,971 $25.275 $0 $7.491 $196 $119,371 $113,191 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 470 111-150-19 $47,502 $4,728 $5.705 $16.327 $O $4,839 $130 $79,322 $74.694 ARLINE,ROBRECHT 477 111-150-20 $41,247 $4,728 $4.842 $13,643 $D $4,044 $113 $68.616 $63.888 ARLINE,ROBRECHT 478 111-150-21 $33.194 $32.336 $3,616 $10,187 $O $3.020 $138 $82,488 $50.152 ATKINSON,FRANKADONNA 479 111-150-22 $15,231 $3,885 $1,600 $4.507 $0 $1,336 $44 $26,803 $22.718 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 480 111-150-23 $12.825 $0,145 $1,233 $3,475 SO $1.030 $41 $24.750 $18.605 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 483 111-150-26 $40,638 $10,768 $2.991 $8.426 $0 $2,498 $108 $65,420 $54.658 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 484 111-150-27 $38.149 $O $4,287 $12,080 $O $3,580 $96 $58,192 $58,192 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 485 111-150-28 $77,130 $0 $8,694 $24,495 $0 $7,260 $194 $117,772 $117,772 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 488 111-150-29 $42,176 $0 $4.883 $13.757 $0 $4,078 $107 $65.002 $65,002 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 487 111-150-30 $45,486 $0 $5.359 $15.099 $0 $4,475 $116 $70.538 $70,6W SANTIAGO.JACK TR 488 111-150-31 $38,817 $0 $4.168 $11,744 $O $3,481 $96 $58,306 $58,306 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 489 111-150-32 $28,149 $0 $4.287 $12,080 SO $3.580 $79 $48.175 $48.175 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 490 111-150-33 $38.004 $0 $2.739 $7.718 $0 $2,287 $85 $51,433 $51,433 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 491 111-150-34 $17.773 $D $1.026 $2,989 $D $856 $37 $22,581 $22,581 KELLER,MELVIN 492 111-150-W $30.143 $0 $O $8,389 $O $2,486 $68 $41,085 $41.085 BROWN,JAMES 493 111-150-37 $36.697 $O $O $10.737 SO $3,183 $82 $49,599 $49,599 KELLER,MELVIN 494 111-150-38 $44,198 $D $0 $14.428 $O $4,277 $104 $63,007 $63,007 WORTHY,ROLAND 495 111-150-39 $49,096 $D $O $16.777 SO $4,973 $117 $70,962 $70.962 WEIR OIL CO. 496 111-150-40 $82,088 $8,725 $D $18.061 $D $5,353 $152 $92,377 $85.652 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 497 111-150-44 $53,952 $O $O $23,153 $O $0,862 $165 $94.122 $94,122 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 500 111-160-47 $3,750 $3,113 $0 $0 $O $O $11 $8,874 $3,761 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 449 159-191-01 $173,469 $2,793 $12,081 $41,775 $O $/6,638 $408 $247,153 $244,370 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 450 159-191-02 $141.808 $5,270 $10.380 $35.893 $O $14,295 $342 $207.988 $202,718 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 451 159-191-03 $124.591 $11,379 $10.110 $34,958 $O $13,923 $321 $195.280 $183,903 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 452 159-191-04 $124,077 $11.795 $10.074 $34,8W $0 $13,874 $320 $194,977 $183,182 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 502 159-281-01 $22.089 $5.050 $2,819 $4,433 $D $2,174 $80 $36.632 $31,574 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 503 159-281-02 $79,293 $5.000 $6,658 $10,469 SD $5,134 $176 $106,729 $101.729 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 504 159-281-03 $9,700 $11,504 $1,601 $2.518 $D $1,235 $44 $26,807 $15,103 HASSETT,GLORIA 508 169-281-05 $64.548 $2.783 $10,648 $16,742 $O $8,210 $169 $103.098 $100.316 PACIFIC COAST HOMES 510 159-282-11 $150,128 $D $O $S4.425 $O $19.095 $385 $234.032 $234,032 WILLIAMS,SCOTT 511 159-282-12 $21,810 $0 $O $9,359 $O $2,774 $56 $33.999 $33,999 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 454 159-311-02 $895,123 $0 $105,873 $298,299 $61.310 $88,416 $2,056 $1,251,078 $1.251,078 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. E-7 �s s M m m M � Mao s m M m m err r s mr m TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHTOFWAYRIGHT-0E-WAY 159-311-02 $572.772 $34 $47.637 $164,722 $36.602 $85,603 $1,469 $887,830 $987.798 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 159-311-02 $481.037 $13 $42.397 $1441,602 $31.686 $58,387 $1,252 $761,374 $761,361 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 455 159-311-03 $156,383 $0 $23.818 $57.109 $22,988 $19,891 $478 $290,658 $290.668 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 456 159-311-04 $11,729 $0 $1.788 $5,033 $1.724 $1,492 $36 $21,800 $21.800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 457 159-311-05 $11.729 $0 $1.786 $5,033 $1.724 $1.492 $36 $21,800 $21,800 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 458 159-311-06 $15,638 $0 $2,382 $8.711 $2.299 $1.989 $48 $29.066 $29,066 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 459 159-311-07 $19,548 $0 $2.977 $8,388 $2,874 $2,486 $00 $38.333 $36.333 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 462 159-311-10 $16,916 $0 s2,577 $7,259 $0 $2.162 $48 $28.951 $28.951 ESPITIA,ALBERT 463 159-311-11 $22,555 $0 $3,435 $9.670 $0 $2.869 $83 $38,801 $38.601 BRUNO,JOE 464 169-311-12 $56,735 $0 $5.240 $18,119 $0 $7.216 $144 $87,455 $87.455 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO. 70 159-393-01 $31,258 $0 $0 $17,962 $0 $3.976 $98 $53.283 $53,283 PACIFIC AMERICAN OIL CO 71 159-393-02 $1.499 $0 $0 $661 $0 $191 $4 $2,555 $2,555 FJAERAN,RANDI 72 159-393-03 $1.490 $0 $0 $861 $0 $191 $4 $2.555 $2,555 GOODING.FRED 73 159-393-04 $2.998 $0 $0 $1.723 $0 $381 $8 $5.110 $5,110 LINDESY,MARGARET 76 159-393-07 $1.499 $0 $0 $861 $0 $191 $4 $2.555 $2.555 PHILLIPS,ORRIN 78 159-393-09 $1,499 $0 $0 $861 $0 $191 $4 $2.555 $2.555 KOVNER,BARBARA 79 159-393-10 $1,499 s0 $0 $861 $0 $191 $4 $2,555 $2,555 PHILLIPS.ORRIN 82 159-393-13 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.178 $0 $260 $0 $3,490 $3,490 MC KENZIE,CHARLES 83 159-393-14 $2.047 $0 $0 s1,176 $0 $260 $8 $3,490 $3,490 LANG.H.A. 84 159-393-15 $2.047 $0 $0 $1.176 $O $280 $0 $3,490 $3,490 MORTON.HAROLD 85 159-393-18 $4.095 $0 $0 $2.353 $0 $521 $11 $6.980 $6,980 MAROW,MILTON Be 159-393-17 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.176 $0 $280 $6 $3.490 $3,490 HANKS,HEBER 87 159-093-18 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.176 $0 $260 $8 $3,490 $3.490 LIAO.DANIEL 88 159-393-19 $4,095 $0 $0 $2.353 $0 $521 $11 $6,980 $8,980 LINDESY,MARGARET 90 159-393-21 $2,047 $0 $0 s1,178 $0 $280 s8 $3,490 $3,490 FJAERAN,RANDI 91 159-393-22 $2,047 $0 $0 s1,176 $0 $280 $5 $3.490 $3,490 WOOLPERT.DUANE 92 159-393-23 $4.095 $0 s0 $2.353 $0 $521 $11 $6.980 $8.980 MARTINSON,DON 94 159-393-26 $2.047 $0 s0 $1.178 $0 $260 $6 $3.490 $3.490 OLIVER,TED 97 159-093-28 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.176 $0 $260 $6 $3,490 $3.490 OUINE,CHRISTOPHER 98 159-393-29 $2,047 $0 $0 $1,176 $0 $260 $8 $3,490 $3.490 ENENBACH,HUGO 99 159-393-M $2,047 $0 $0 $1.170 $0 5280 $8 $3,490 $3,490 GUTHRIE,LAURA 100 159-393-31 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.176 $0 $280 $6 $3,490 $3,490 TAYLOR.MICHAEL 102 159-393-33 $2,047 $0 $0 $1.178 $0 $280 s8 $3.490 $3.490 CARMICHAEL.GEORGE 103 159-393-34 $2.047 $0 $0 $1.178 $0 $260 $0 $3,490 $3,490 SWARTZ.THELMA 105 159-393-W $6,142 $0 $0 $3,529 $0 $781 $17 $10,470 $10,470 MAROW,MILTON 107 159-393-M $2,047 $0 $0 $1.176 s0 $260 $6 $3,490 $3,490 ADLER,KENNETH 109 159-393-40 $2.047 s0 $D $1.176 $0 $260 se $3.490 $3,490 DAVIS.MICHAEL 110 159-393-41 $2.047 $0 $0 $1.176 $0 $260 se $3,490 $3,490 MAYER,RICHARD 113 159-393-44 $2,047 $0 $D $1.176 $0 $260 $6 $3.490 $3,490 MAROW.MILTON 114 159-393-45 $2,047 $0 $0 $1,176 $0 $260 $6 $3.490 $3,490 ADLER,KENNETH 115 159-303-40 $2,047 $0 $O $1.178 $0 $280 $0 $3,490 $3,490 DAVIS,MICHAEL 118 159-393-47 $2,047 $0 $0 $1,176 $0 $260 $6 $3,490 $3,490 BOUSKA,WILLIAM 117 159-093-48 $2,047 $0 $0 $1,176 $0 $260 $6 $3,490 $3.490 MORTON.HAROLD 119 159-393-50 $4,095 $0 $0 $2.353 $0 $521 $11 $6.980 $8.980 MORTON,HAROLD E-8 r �i► it r M Mao r ■r M r M M Mr m m M TOTAL STREET TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ASSESSOR IMPROVEMENT TOTAL RIGHT STORM WATER SEWAGE FIRE& ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LIEN PARCEL COST PER OF WAY DRAIN IMP. FLOW POLICE INCIDENTA WITH WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER NUMBER NUMBER PARCEL COST COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS COSTS RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHTOF-WAY $34,149,422 3,555,955 $3.492.147 $14.424.000 $1.169,950 $3.945,000 $100,000 $00.836,474 $57,290.519 E-9 1 1 � APPENDIg F CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r ORDINANCE N0. 3191 F-1 i ' ORDINANCE NO. 3151 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW CHAPTER 17 . 68 ENTITLED COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, in the course of the development of properties, whether through the subdivision process or through the development or redevelopment of previously subdivided ' properties, it is frequently necessary or desirable to require a developer to install and dedicate for public use certain public improvements which exceed in size, capacity, number, or length that which is normally required for their subdivision or development, or which are located off-site of the development and benefit property or properties not within the subdivision or development; and It is the purpose of this ordinance to establish requirements and procedures for reimbursement to the developer and/or the City by those property owners who subsequently benefit from these improvements, to the extent of their benefit; and It is the intent of the City Council that owners of all properties benefited from the public improvement make the appropriate reimbursements to the developer and/or City; and It is the intent of the Council that this chapter shall be in addition to, and supplemental to, the reimbursement procedures set forth in the State Subdivision Map Act, the State Streets and Highways Code, and any other provisions of state law .1 6/24/92: 133 F-2 i 1 or of this Municipal Code relating to the subject matter of this chapter, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended to add new Chapter 17 . 68, entitled "Cost Reimbursement Districts, " to read as follows: 17. 68 . 010 Requirement for Installation of Improvements . A developer may be required to install and dedicate public improvements as a condition of approval for their subdivision or development which may contain supplemental size, capacity, ' number, or length for the benefit of property not within their subdivision or development. When such supplemental size, capacity, number, or length is solely for the benefit of property not within the subdivision or development, the � ... developer may follow the procedures of this ordinance to establish a cost reimbursement district prior to, or concurrent with, the installation of the improvements, however, under ' unique circumstances City Council may deviate from this requirement . Provisions of this chapter may be invoked by the ' City whenever the City installs improvements in advance of development which benefits or serves property within the City or within the City' s sphere of influence to allow the City to receive reimbursement. 17. 68. 020 Definitions . (a) "Actual or estimated costs of public improvements" ' 6/24/92 : 133 F-3 means the actual or estimated costs for construction, design iengineering, district formation, right-of-way appraisal and acquisition costs, condemnation proceedings, environmental impact mitigation; plan check and permit fees, construction inspections, maintenance of improvements; or any other expenses attributable to the construction of improvements . If the scope of the project is altered during construction in order to respond to events or circumstances which are revealed during construction, the City Council may increase the estimated cost by not more than ten percent without notice to the affected property owners. ' (b) "Substantial completion of a facility" shall be defined as that extent of construction of a facility which will allow the facility to be used for the purpose for which it was intended. (c) "Benefited area" means the entire area which receives a benefit from the public improvement. The "benefited area" shall be that area which, in the opinion of the City Council, upon the recommendation of the City Engineer, and after a noticed public hearing, is determined to be the area benefited by the construction of the public improvements . (d) "Developer" means the person who is responsible for constructing the public improvement. 1 (e) "Excess costs" means the costs attributable to that portion of improvements which benefit areas outside the ' development area. Benefit may be determined by any commonly accepted method which fairly apportions the cost of the ' improvements to the benefiting properties . 6/24/92 : 133 ' F-4 (f) "Public improvements" means those improvements as set forth herein including, but not limited to, streets, bridges, traffic signals, street lights, drainage, flood control, water or sanitary sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, landscaping, grading, soil remediation, abandonment of oil facilities, relocation of utilities, other public ' facilities such as parks, libraries, fire stations, police stations, and any accessory improvements necessary for the functioning of the public improvements, but shall not include any public improvements which will benefit only the development iin which they are located. "Public improvements" shall also include any property or property interests reasonably necessary for the construction of the improvement . (g) "Reimbursement district" means the benefited area within which property shall be made subject to a reimbursement charge for the purpose of reimbursing the developer and/or City for the excess costs of the public improvement. (h) "Supplemental improvements" means with respect to ' a development project those improvements which are public improvements and are: 1) required as a condition of approval of ' the development project which have a size, capacity, number, or length greater than necessary solely to benefit or mitigate the iimpacts of the development project; and 2) improvements which have been agreed upon between the City and developer . (i) "Administrative costs" shall be defined as costs ' for direct labor and employee benefits, outside consultants costs, direct materials, allied indirect costs, overhead costs, overhead costs and fixed assets, or depreciation charges . 6/24/92 : 133 F-5 17 . 68 . 030 . Application for Cost Reimbursement District . Whenever a developer elects , or is required by the City, to install or replace supplemental improvements , or whenever the City participates in the costs of supplemental improvements or improvements in advance of development; and provided that the costs of such improvements are not financed by an assessment ' under a public improvements proceeding, the developer may submit an application for formation of a cost reimbursement district, or the City Council, on its own motion, may initiate the formation of a cost reimbursement district. The application of the developer shall be in writing and shall be submitted to the ' office of the City Engineer with a nonrefundable application fee. The City Engineer shall expeditiously process the request to City Council . 17. 68 . 040 Costs for Formation of the Cost Reimbursement District . Prior to the City Council authorizing the initiation of the formation of the cost reimbursement district, the developer shall deposit with the City the following fees to cover various administration costs: (a) A nonrefundable application fee will be required from the developer prior to commencing any work on the cost reimbursement district. The amount of the application fee will be determined by a resolution of the City Council . The application fee will be deposited in a general cost reimbursement district administration fund established by the City Treasurer . ' 6/24/92: 133 F-6 (b) District formation fees shall be deposited into a Mspecific project fund for each individual project to cover such expenses as the calculation of the reimbursement costs of the supplemental improvements, determination of the benefited area, ' determination of the apportionment of the excess costs to the benefiting parcels, and audit time. District formation fees will also include publishing of all notices, mailings, County Recorder fees, and City administrative costs . Once the fees have been deposited to the City by the developer, the City Engineer will process the developer' s request to City Council. The City Engineer may request that special engineering services be retained to prepare the documents and estimates . This retained engineer shall have no business relationship with the developer. The costs of any such engineering services shall be paid by the developer; however, the costs shall be considered an incidental cost of the improvements to be recouped pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance. 17. 68 . 050 Costs for Monitorina the Cost Reimbursement District After Formation. Three weeks prior to the noticed public hearing the Developer will be required to deposit fees ' into a specific project monitoring fund. Project monitoring fees for each district will be determined by a resolution of the City Council. If the district is formed by the City Council, ' this fee will be expended to cover the administrative costs of annually monitoring the District. If the fund becomes depleted, the developer will be required to replenish the fund in accordance with the above mentioned resolution of the City Council . If the developer does not replenish the monitoring 6124192: 133 F_7 fund within one month after written notice from the City, the district may be abandoned. 17 . 68 . 060 Report of the City Engineer . Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, the City Engineer shall prepare and file with the City Clerk a report containing the following information: (a) A map indicating the boundaries of the district which identifies all parcels within the district. (b) The actual or total estimated cost of the supplemental improvements. (c) The proposed spread of the excess costs to the benefiting property owners. 17. 68 . 070 Notice and Hearing on Establishment of Cost Reimbursement District. (a) Upon receiving the request from the City Engineer, the City Clerk shall set a noticed public hearing before the City Council . The City Clerk shall cause a notice of the hearing, in substantially the following form, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Huntington Beach at least ten days prior to such hearing : NOTICE OF HEARING The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach will hold ' a public hearing at on at the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 to consider the establishment of a cost reimbursement district for the financing of certain public facilities and related improvements within the City, otherwise known as the 6/24/92: 133 F_8 Cost Reimbursement District No . Your property is located within the proposed boundaries of the Cost Reimbursement District and may be subject to a lien to pay a portion of the cost of providing public facilities which ' benefit your parcel of land except for the conditions listed below. If within a 20-year period from the date of forming this ' district, you either file a final map (subdivision, parcel, consolidation, etc. ) or apply for a building permit, the lien and accumulated interest would become due and payable. Exceptions ' Building permits for: 1 . building alterations for non-residential uses which do not exceed a third of the value of a building, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, Sand which effect no change in occupancy; 2 . building alterations or additions for residential use which add no residential units; ' 3 . fences and walls; 4 . repair of construction defects or damage due to ' fire, civil unrest, flood or any other destructive act of nature which does not increase the building iarea by more than one third the original area; or ' 5 . Temporary uses as specified in the City of Huntington Beach' s Municipal Code, Article 973 . ' The proposed boundaries of the district are more particularly described by Diagram No. which is on file in the Office of the City clerk. All persons desiring to 6/24/92 : 133 F-9 testifywith respect to: the necessity of said public P Y improvements, the cost of said public improvements, the benefited area or the amount of the costs eligible to be recovered, may appear and be heard at said hearing . (b) The City Engineer shall, at least 20 days prior to the hearing, cause a copy of the above notice to be mailed to ' each owner of real property within the benefited area as shown on the last equalized tax roll . Such notice shall be accompanied by a diagram of the proposed benefited area and a statement by the City Engineer describing the following: 1. A description of the public improvements and that portion considered to be in excess of the developer ' s requirements . ' 2 . The estimated or actual costs necessary to pay for the public improvements . ' 3 . The actual or estimated costs of public improvements which are proposed to be liened against the benefiting property when such property ' is developed or redeveloped. 4 . A diagram indicating the boundaries of the district. 17 . 68 . 080 Action by City Council . (a) After the public hearing the City Council may, in its sole discretion, approve a resolution establishing the cost reimbursement district and may enter into a reimbursement ' agreement with the developer to provide for the disbursements of proceeds of the cost reimbursement district . 6/24/92 : 133 F-10 (b) The resolution establishing the cost reimbursement Mdistrict shall indicate it is a resolution of lien. The resolution shall reference an exhibit containing the following : 1 . A list of the properties identified by assessor ' s parcel numbers which are included within the district boundaries . 2 . A diagram indicating the boundaries of the district and identifying the properties to be liened. 3 . An apportionment of the excess costs which ' represent the actual or estimated amount to be levied against each parcel within the district . If the costs are estimated, the resolution will indicate that the liens are subject to recomputation by the City Engineer when the ' construction and final audit have been completed. 4 . The time when such liened costs are due and payable. ' 5. A statement indicating that the liens are subject to an interest charge, the terms of which shall be defined. (c) Once the cost reimbursement district has been ' approved by a resolution of the City Council, it shall establish ' a statement of charges due from the benefiting property owners and their successors, heirs or assigns of the various parcels of property as their benefited share of the public improvements . 6/24/92 : 133 F_99 (d) The City Engineer shall record a copy of the ' Council resolution with the County Recorder. Upon payment of the amounts due, or upon the expiration of the district, the ' City Engineer shall cause to be filed a release of lien upon the affected property or properties . 17 . 68 . 090 Recomputation of Lien. If the District is formed based on estimated costs, then the City Engineer shall reapportion the lien amounts after final costs have been calculated and verified by the City Engineer or his designee, and shall cause the lien roll to be appropriately modified. All affected property owners shall be notified in writing of their final lien amount. 17. 68. 100 Administrative Audit. The Director of ' Finance shall prepare a report indicating the administrative costs incurred for each District on an annual basis . The report ' shall be prepared each calendar year following the formation of a Cost Reimbursement District and shall be completed by February 15 . ' 17. 68 . 110 Limitations on Reimbursement Agreement. (a) The reimbursement agreement with the developer shall contain provisions deemed necessary and appropriate to specify the terms and conditions for reimbursing the developer when lien payments are received. (b) The reimbursement agreement shall indicate that the liens are subject to an interest charge and shall be payable to the City during the term of the agreement . Lien payments shall be placed by the City in the appropriate fund account i 6/24/92: 133 F-12 ' established by Council for each district . These funds will be established to reimburse the developer for costs incurred for the construction of the improvements . All accrued interest in ' this fund will be transferred to the project monitoring fund. The term of any reimbursement agreement shall be established by the City Council based upon the reasonable expectations of the development of benefited properties or the utilization of the public improvement by such benefited properties provided, however, that the maximum term of any reimbursement agreement shall be for a period of 20 years . ' (c) If, during the established period, not to exceed 20 years, following the formation of the district, any person records a final map (subdivision, parcel, consolidation, etc. ) or applies for a building permit on a parcel for which a lien for supplemental improvements has been established in accordance ' with this chapter, and such person or their predecessor in interest has not paid such lien to the City, the established lien shall be paid prior to the recording of the final map or ' the issuance of the building permit; provided, however, such payment shall not be required in connection with building permits described below: 1 . Building alterations for non-residential uses which do not exceed a third of the value of a building, as defined in the Uniform Building Code, ' and which effect no change in occupancy. 2 . Building alterations or additions for residential use which add no residential units . 6/24/92 : 133 F-13 ' 3 . Fences and walls . 4 . Repair of construction defects or damage due to fire, civil unrest , flood or any other destructive act of nature which does not increase the building area by more than one third the original area . 5 . Temporary uses as specified in the City of ' Huntington Beach' s Municipal Code, Article 973 . (d) All liens shall include a principal charge plus an ' interest charge calculated from the date of establishment of lien. The date of establishment shall be the date of acceptance of the public improvements by the City, or City Council approval of the District, whichever occurs later. 17. 68 . 12• Obligation •f Developer or Subdivider to Claim Monies . All monies collected under the provisions of this chapter shall be deposited by the City Treasurer into the appropriate fund established for the collection of funds and the monitoring of the district. The City Treasurer shall refund rannually to the person or persons who paid for the Supplemental Improvements_ for which the liens were collected, or to their assignees, all monies so collected. The City shall notify the developer of the existence of monies deposited in said fund. No funds will be .reimbursed to the developer until all costs included in the district have been verified by the City Engineer . The notice shall be mailed to the address contained in the reimbursement agreement and no further inquiries shall be required by the City. If any such money remains on deposit with the City without being claimed by the party rightfully entitled 6/24/92 : 133 F-14 to it within three years after notice has been made as provided Mherein, such money shall be forfeited to the City and then it shall be transferred to the general fund of the City. 17 . 68 . 130 Delegation of Duties . Whenever a duty is delegated or reposed in a city official or employee, except the City Council, that official or employee may delegate all or a portion of these duties to an assistant, deputy, or other employee of the City. 17 . 68 . 140 Time Limit for Challenge to District . Any action proceeding to challenge, attack, set aside, avoid, or rreview the decision of the City Council to establish a cost reimbursement district or a reimbursement charge, fee, or requirement, or to decline to establish a district shall be ' brought by an interested person within 30 days of the date of the recordation of the resolution of the City Council decision ' with the County recorder or within 90 days of the date of the decision, whichever is sooner . SECTION 2. This. ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the 30th day from and after its passage. r Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO L�Lam , F"7r'�'lLG ' City Clerk City Aterney REVIEWED AND APPR D: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Adm nis rator r Director of Public Works ' sg 6/24/92 : 133 F-15 ' - Ord. No. 3151 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number ' of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 6t-h day of July 19 92 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the loth day of July , 19 92 , and ' was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all. the, members of said City Council . AYES: Councilmembers: ' Robitaille, Winchell, Silva, Green. MacAllictar. xPily ' NOES: Councilmembers: None ' ABSENT: Councilmembers: Moulton-Patterson City Clerk and ex-officio Verk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ' F-16 •� CITY OF HUNTINGTOA BEACH Department of Public Works HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT 93-1 PROPERTY OWNERS' WRITTEN COMMENTS January 26, 1994 Attachment (4) ?EAR COUNCIL MEMBER 1 , I OWN A.P, # 159-311-10, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 28,951. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REI DISTRICT # 93-1 MBURSMENT THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, =. -5' /> ALBERT ESPITIA ^ r� 4�0 DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WILMA ALBERT �7 DEAR MAYOR, I OWN A.P. # 110-222-02, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,850. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, HIRO WOODSON i DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111-150-17 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 469,193. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WILLIAM COTT ol DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I . ... I OWN A.P. # 111 -130-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 204,5G�, i I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WILVIAN RENNER DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, ! I OWN A.P. # 110-212-02 &=?flT.HERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $"51,589. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ` CECIL FOLMAR - DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 110-212-10- & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 23,330. : IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. I DO NOT THINK THIS < PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE-PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ........::.. ..::.:.. .....:......::: ....::::.: DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER , 1 OWN A.P. # 110-212-10 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ± ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 23,330. 1 DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, z DE COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 110-210-06 IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 33,569. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, / JOHN CHUESLER DEAR MAYOR, i j I OWN A.P. # 111 -130-14 & OTHERS, THEY ARE 1 ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 141,408. i I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT :;t i r >rsL2f DISTRICT # 93 THANK YOU FOR YOUR C LS ERATIPN, I t t BO BIE WILLIAMS { DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, WE OWN A.P. # 111 -110-34 & OTHERS, THEY ARE ABOUT TO LIENED $ 163,393. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAIN-ST"THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YO NSIDERATION, . 1IEA R & UKA 1 DEAR MAYOR, I OWN A.P. # 110--Z2-1-18, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,910. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT t DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, JAM ES MITCHELL i . i DEAR MAYOR, I OWN A.P. # 111 -120-01, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 133,258. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT .. _. DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ( S & IL Co. `7�7-oS DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 110-222-05, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,910. [ DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ( K NNETH HUBBS DEAR UNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT I TO BE LIENED FOR'-$ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WJLMA ALBERT j - i DEAR MAYOR, i I OWN A.P. # 111 —120-29, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 1.07,882. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS.-FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT 48� t ....,,•, -,•, «)4^., DISTRICT # 93-1. ' THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATIO , �J E M U N I R. DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, OWN A.P. # 111 —140-18, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 121,724. DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, be D GMAR• JONES` ` -tr j �`i �.: (*-mot'�'��-�.�.: �Lv 1 1 , DEAR 7UNCIL MEMBER, I . OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, -,WILMA ALBERT L / DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. E THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, 'tt;,. t.?�� :b:?tlKL"7;kti'<;: ?:.+'. .��-�/� k{$Lt.ntftf3ii.:f>.i:>2;:>��.t,..„•�ctthtii'.;:r WILMA ALBER-Y -� DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ' WILMA ALBERT DF -' COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -110-14, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 26,558. E: I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YO ON IDDE,RRATION, CHRISTOP ER TAYL DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 159-311-11, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 38,601. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS- FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ,113E BRUNO DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ;'I ' WILMA ALBERT R COUNCIL MEMBER, } I OWN A.P. # 111-110-21 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 289,126. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOU CONSIDERAP11ON, I. A PEDERSEN_ �. DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # III -140-16, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. i DO NOT THINK THIS -IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIQ.- ATION, WALTER DABNEY DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 110-213-12, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,300. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOU_R_CONSID_ RATION, RONALD4_ RGHETTI DEAR COUNCIL MEMBER, I OWN A.P. # 111 -110-19, IT IS ABOUT' TO BE LIENED FOR $ 129,243. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION RUB GREER, TR. .;.,_:...,:;:.. .. DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-212-10 & OTHERS._ THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 23,330. 1 DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 110-212-02 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED- FOR $ 51,589. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, CECIL fOLMAR DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -130-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 204,569. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WILVIAN`RENNER i DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-222-02, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,850. I DO NOT THINK THIS .4.S -FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO �'kE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBUR"SMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, HIRO WOODSON DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 111 -130-14 & OTHERS, THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 141,408. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM ' OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YO C ERATION, BOBBIE WILLIAMS DEAR MR. MAY, I 0 V;'4' A.P. # 159-311-11, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 38,601. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, t_;OE BRUNO DEAR MR. MAY, WE OWN A.P. # 111 -110-34 & OTHERS, THEY ARE ABOUT TO LIENED $ 163,393. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, AVER & MOLA DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -110-14, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 26,558. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91 -1. THANK YOU FOR YOU NSIDERAT/101i1, CHRISTOPH!'SR TAYL DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -110-20,.-IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 129,155. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, MICHAEL RAMSY R. I DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-213-12, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $-4,300. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR L L. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCILAM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATION, f-.� ti-- RONALD BORGHETTI DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-15, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. 1 DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, Z��22- WILMA ALBERT r DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -110-19, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 129,243. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FA}R, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, RUBY R TR.� NEAR MR. MAY, _ I OWN A.P. # 110-210-06 IT IS ABOUT TO BE i LIENED FOR $ 33,569. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, JOHN SCHUESLER i i I . .DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-18, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 121,724. i I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. i PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM r OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. 1 THANK YOU FOR YOUR: CONSIDERATION, 4 DAG AR JONES DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 111 -120-01, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 133,258. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, - S & COILCO. DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-210-01 IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED _FOR $ 110,840. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOU CONSIDERATION, WILLIAM LANDIS fhl TILL f DS -8.ST. WI0 or"i J.00' -- /4 f�0 pNoj'Jf DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 111 -140-16, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 140,095. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, WALTER DABNEY i DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 111 -120-29, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 107;282. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATIO J E MU I , TR. DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 110-222-13, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,910. DO NOT THINK THIS IS. FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YO R CONSID RATION, I HAROLD MORTON ! DEAR MR. MAY, 5v-a o OWN A.P. # 111 -150-19,1IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 79,322. -+- I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ROBRECHT ARLINE DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-222-11, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 14,730. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91 -1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, T NORMA YOUNG, ! v (�, �U O iJ ; E2/ / 7 OtiLy ,�IEAA-"S L +-(A /t TO MAi,UTAf r ThLj_Li Fc ST'��Lr_. t�r.� Se ✓cry ti'O .- I i } DEAR MR. MAY, _ I OWN A.P. # 110-211 -13 IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,300. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. �. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, DENA-WOOD ---------------- DEAR MR. MAY, OWN A.P. # 110-213-07 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR- $ 22,071. i DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, ERIK WALLBANK / q . ` eo/A t'�Ici . s Ale r il. ���. rft• J. - c�.;�, <, ',�r�,�.YJ� lJi�7 ��7� v3 -% ; .� �sA• 1 l n/2,2 ;74ql,, /� -,c�,rr=�y,✓J.7i o�/ 02 �: ,�=..�'?i�J'�����'"rtA_%rr���'c' �sr���,� { WEAVER & THOMAS q19061 CRYSTAL STREET {� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 April 19 , 1993 TELEPHONE 714 536-8223 714 848-0097 - D Mayor Grace Winchell APR 2 01993 City of Huntington Beach C�jYOFHUNT� 2000 Main Street NGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE Re: Holly Seacliff Development Proposed Assessment on all Property Owners Dear Mrs . Winchell : In response to the notice from the City of Huntington Beach regarding the proposed assessment fees , we are hav- ing no problems prior to this development . Traffic con- trol is ok, all utilities are available, drainage is ok, and the streets are adequate for existing traffic. The Seaclif.f Development is creating problems so they should have to pay the costs of the improvements accord- ing to the agreement they signed. They agreed to pay all costs for the streets and acquisition of properties for right-of-ways . It appears the staff of the City of Huntington Beach is working for the Developer rather than the people of Huntington Beach. I own several parcels at Garfield and Crystal. This assessment would be a hardship on all of the property owners in this area. With your past record of being fair, I ask that you and the council members give us great consideration in this matter and not jeopardoze our investments just to please the developers . They will develop the property , reap the profits and then leave the area. We thank you for your consideration and help with this serious matter. Sincerely , 44L Carl M. Weaver CMW: em LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM LANDIS 1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS SUITE 1080 • CENTURY CITY LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90067 310/ 277-3322 • 277-4422 TO City of Huntington Beach DATE May 16 , 1993 Dept. of Public Works P.O. Box 190 SUBJECT Parcel No. 110-210-01 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Proposed Reimbursement Dist. 93-1 Attn: Steve May Dear Mr. May: I strongly protest the inclusion of the above parcel number in the reimbursement district that would charge the property the sum of $112,518.48 . This parcel has been assessed an additional $34 ,000. 00 annually for 30 years based on improvements not associated with the benefits to be derived. I find this assessment abhorrent also. Please file this protest with the appropriate city department. Ve y tr�ly�s, WILLIAM LANDIS WL/ls WEAVER & THOMAS 19061 CRYSTAL STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 TELEPHONE 714 536-8223 April 12, 1993 714 848-0097 Attention:. Steve May. City of Huntington Beach • Department of Public Works P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Re : Proposed Reimbursement District 93-1 Dear Sir : Received your letter regarding the Development Fees . It appears the "Developers" run the City of Hunting- ton Beach. These street improvements are designed to benefit them. Small Operators like myself can' t afford these assess- ments . It should be charged to the Developer as this was part of the agreement to rezone properties that they own and are going to develop. Yours truly, WEAVER & THOMAS��J Carl M. Weaver CMW: em Fro he , QUALITY+4UTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER MAY 4, 1993 MR. STEVE MAY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 RE: PROPOSED HOLLY SEACLIFF REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT DEAR STEVE, PER YOUR REQUEST FOR INPUT, I HOPE YOU WILL FIND THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS HELPFUL FOR YOUR PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL. A REIMBURSEMENT LIEN WOULD BE FAIR FOR: 1. RIGHT-OF"WAY ACQUISITION IF THE PROPERTY OWNER CHOSE NOT TO DEDICATE THE REQUIRED PROPERTY. y. WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT CURRENT CODE WOULD REQUIRE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS WERE THE PROPERTY TO BE BUILT ON TODAY. 3. CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, & ROADWAY TO THE CENTERLINE IF CURRENT CODE WOULD REQUIRE AS IN #2 ABOVE. 4. FIRE HYDRANT, STREET LIGHTS, & OTHER OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS IF CURRENT CODE WOULD REQUIRE AS IN #2 ABOVE. FUTURE DEVELOPERS COSTS (AT TIME OF CONNECTION) WOULD BE FAIR FOR: 1. REASONABLE CHARGES TO CONNECT TO THE SEWER SYSTEM. 2. REASONABLE CHARGES TO CONNECT TO THE WATER SYSTEM. 19161 CRYSTAL STREET • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 • (714) 847-5600 .- &vrotlhwez- QUALITY AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER STEVE MAY, PAGE TWO NO CHARGES SHOULD BE MADE TO LAND OWNERS INSIDE THE HOLLY SEACLIFF / ELLIS GOLDENWEST AREAS FOR THE MAJOR DEVELOPERS COSTS TO CONSTRUCT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REQUIRED: 1. ARTERIAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS NOT DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF A SUBJECT PROPERTY. E. TRAFFIC SIGNALS, NEW OR MODIFIED. 3. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION COSTS. 4. STORM DRAIN FACILITIES REQUIRED DUE TO MAJOR DEVELOPMENT. 5. WATER FACILITIES INCLUDING GREEN ACRE. 6. SEWER FACILITIES. 7. FIRE AND POLICE STATION FACILITIES DUE TO MAJOR DEVELOPMENT. e. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF I MAY BE OF FURTHER SERVICE TO YOU OR THE COUNCIL. IN ERELY, ,A - -� J HN A. GU TAFSON 19161 CRYSTAL STREET • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 • (714) 847-5600 t iG UBL IC O DE KS HUNTINGTON BEACH,, CALIF. - - - �!zi-zti ' Aw ti"r i e -- zi A4010, ��c � �jz A,- 0 STEPHEN MONTELEONE MONTELEONE & MCCRORY ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE (1886-1962) LAWYERS SUITE 750 A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 1551 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZA, SUITE 2500 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PATRICK J. DUFFY TELEPHONE PARTNER MAILING ADDRESS (714) 565-3170 P. 0. BOX 7806 TELECOPIER UNIVERSAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 91608-7806 (714) 565-3184 TELEPHONE (818) 509-6100 TELECOPIER (818) 509-6148 June 15, 1993 OUR FILE NUMBER 12052 PLEASE REPLY TO SANTA ANA The City of Huntington Beach City Council: Mayor Grace Winchell Mayor Pro-Tem Linda Moulton-Patterson Victor Leipzig Earle Robitaille Jim Silva Dave Sullivan Steve May, Department of Public Works 2000 Main Street Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Proposed Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District Dear Council Members and Mr. May: This letter is written to you on behalf of five owners of property within the Proposed Holly Seacliff Reimbursement District whose names are listed below. These City of Huntington Beach property owners urge the City Council to use its discretion to decline the creation the Proposed Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District for the following reasons: 1. A cost reimbursement district should not be formed to pay developer costs unless they are excess. California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66487 permit a city to require a subdivider to install supplemental public improvements as a condition of approving a tract development. These sections authorize the city to enter into an agreement with the subdivider for reimbursement of a portion of those costs, but only when the improvements are excess to those that will be required for use by the new tract. The statute allows reimbursement only for improvements "in excess of the construction required for the subdivision. " EDBkL.U2052004.CHB LAW OFFICES MONTELEONE & MCCRORY The City of Huntington Beach City Council Steve May, Department of Public Works June 15, 1993 Page 2 City of Huntington Beach Ordinance No. 3151 provides the method by which subdividers may seek the creation of a reimbursement district: "When such supplemental size, capacity, number, or length (of required improvements] is solely for the benefit of property not within the subdivision or development, the developer may follow the procedures of this ordinance to establish a cost reimbursement district. " Ordinance 3151, subchapter 17 . 68. 010 (emphasis added) . This ordinance is more restrictive than the statute and sets as a standard only costs which are solely for the benefit of other property. The method used by Willdan Associates to allocate the assessments for the proposed cost reimbursement district has apportioned all of the improvement costs, including those for the Holly-Seacliff subdivision, to the selected parcels. Pursuant to the Government Code and Ordinance No. 3151, only the cost of supplemental improvements which solely benefit the properties outside of the subdivision should be assessed through a cost reimbursement district. Since a large portion or all the improvements which the subdividers seek to charge to the assessment district benefit the subdividers, this assessment proposal is flawed. The cost reimbursement proposal appears solely to be a means for the subdividers to spread the expense of public improvements benefitting their subdivision to surrounding property owners who will receive little or no benefit. 2. The improvements do not benefit the surrounding properties. According to the Government Code and City Ordinance No. 3151, only the cost of improvements that benefit a parcel should be apportioned to that parcel. The improvements to be furnished pursuant to the Holly-Seacliff Plan benefit the Holly-Seacliff Development and do not benefit the surrounding property owners subject to the proposed assessments. These property owners should not have to pay for the improvement of roads intended to benefit future homeowners within the Holly-Seacliff subdivision, when these road improvements are unnecessary for the current industrial uses of the properties. Similarly, surrounding property owners should not be assessed for water, drainage and sewer improvements that will primarily serve the subdivision. Current services are sufficient to serve the properties as they are now used. Supplemental services are only needed to provide for the changed use of the subdivision property. EDB\L\12052004.CHB LAW OFFICES MONTELEONE & MCCRORY The City of Huntington Beach City Council Steve May, Department of Public Works June 15, 1993 Page 3 Furthermore, the manner in which these improvement costs have been apportioned is unfair. For example, one of the property owners below will be assessed the same amount for road improvements as the owners of adjacent unimproved property even though he has already installed curbs, sidewalks and gutters. The other property owners I represent simply do not want these upgrades. They run businesses on their properties and have no need for improvements which will inhibit the industrial uses of the property. The City Council is not obliged to enact the proposed Holly-Seacliff Reimbursement District. The proposal unfairly assesses surrounding property owners for improvements which will benefit the Holly-Seacliff Subdivision. The proposed district is nothing more than a bold attempt by subdividers to charge their neighbors a portion of the costs completely necessary to the subdivision and not excess to it. The alleged benefits are not wanted by surrounding property owners and are not necessary for the intended and continuing use of their properties. On behalf of these property owners I urge you not to implement the Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, MONTELEONE & McCRORY By,,,? PATRICK V. DUFFY?t On Behalf John Gustafson 19161 Crystal Street Robert Anderson 19082 Crystal Street Michael Ramsey 18811 Crystal Street Carl Weaver 19061 Crystal Street Robert Mandic 18881 Crystal Street PJD/sr EDBU 205200CCHB - MAY 2 51993 I CITY OF HUNT►NGT__ON FACE BEACH PROPOSED HRRY�N C LIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT COMMENT SHEET Comment No. Sheet l of� (City Use) Please return any comments to Attn: Steve May, City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, 2000 Main St., P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. All comments received will be submitted to the City Council, with staffs responses where necessary. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 1 S9 — .3)1 —/U Property Address (if any): T�c m2 e Description of existing private, on site improvements: COMMENTS: 6 YkLiZAIL P � S9 �� �vv Y 93ilkifl�2�P a ,mac u-e� ���i-cv`��� ,(i�a,i� &4All f (attach additional eets if necessary) B . r `✓-c /f y lztc• - Signature cN=y\houy\roimb.m PROPOSED HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT COMMENT SHEET Comment No. Sheet 2 of �- (City Use) Please return any comments to Attn: Steve May, City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, 2000 Main St., P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. All comments received will be submitted to the City Council, with staffs responses where necessary. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Property Address (if any): / Description of existing private, on site improvements: COMMENTS: OF aaZ i d (attaclf additional sheets if necessary) By: Date: - -� Signature cAmay%ho*Amimb.07 PROPOSED HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT COMMENT SHEET Comment No. Sheet3 of-4 (City Use) Please return any comments to Attn: Steve May, City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works, 2000 Main St., P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. All comments received will be submitted to the City Council, with staff's responses where necessary. Assessor's Parcel Number(s): /5 /O Property Address (if any): L dp Description of existing private, on site improvements: COMMENTS: (attach additional sheets if necessary) By: a a� Date: 3110f2 OQ� Signature c.\meyVbo0yWmb.07 May 26, 1993 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Department of Public Works 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Steve May Dear Mr. May: I am 75 years old. I had planned my retirement for many years, measuring my securities as to plan a stable future for my wife, children and grandchildren. I planned for any worst-case scenario possible. Your proposed Cost Reimbursement District is something I could never have planned for, let alone even dreamed of. With property values at fifty percent of what they were only three years ago, your "Fair Share" assessment works out to be more than 40% of the value of my property! I am not a developer nor am I wealthy. I cannot afford the amount proposed to be liened against my property that will have to be discounted in a sale, and still support my family. I have a question. Will the new residents write me a "thank-you" note for losing almost half of my property so that they can obliviously move into a brand new home and facilities that I paid for? I think you know that, as ridiculous as this sounds, it is in fact, only inches from the truth. This Cost Reimbursement District proposal is unfairly assessed, unethical, and the details within its body are a disgrace. I object to this proposal up for adoption by the City Council. I ask you please to vote against this proposal, and reconsider what it will do to my family, and probably most of the others who are not "developers" but just regular people who I guess made a mistake owning land in Huntington Beach. Yours truly, Alvin R. Cohn Assessor Parcel Number: 111-110-04/ 111-110-32 (these are ajoining lots) - M.H. Marow 864 N. Bundy Dr. (310)472-1697 Los Angeles, California 90049 - June 29, 1993 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention:Steve May Public Works Re: Exemption from Reimbursement District 93-1 Ellis Golden West Dear Mr. Steve May The Metropolitan Water District declared exemption from charges on our small "Encyclopedia Lots", as undevelopable,located and zoned as follows: Parkland - Recreation Open Space - north of Ellis: tracts #32, 44A & B, 8 and 45. Sensitive Area - Open Space - Limited use south of Ellis: tracts Fairview and TR 62 We will accrue no benefits from infrastructure improvements; Reimbursement Distric 93-1 We request your support for: (A) exemption or, (B) Estate Development Designation. Sincerely, Milton H. Marow, et.al. Owner 60 years Encl: M.W.D. Exemption METROPOl1TAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CAIFORNIA Oil;;Y' 8, ;r, r;:-,<,.;,t „ `W1 March 1 . 7.993 Mr. Milton H. Marow y' 864 N. Bundy Drive Los Angeles, CA 90049 Dear Mr. Marow: _ Your request for exemption from the Metropolitan Water District's water standby charge has been reviewed by the District's General Manager. In accordance with Resolution 8367 , by which the District's Board of Directors established the standby charge in May 1992 , lands shall be exempt from the water standby charge if they are: Category 1 - Lands owned by the government of the United States, the State of California, or by a political subdivision thereof, or any unit of local government; Category 2 - Lands permanently committed to open space and maintained in their natural state that are not now and will not in the future be supplied water; or Category 3 - Lands not included in (1) or (2) above which the General Manager, in his discretion,_ finds__ do not now an canno b�reasonabe expected t_o derive a benefit fr- om t-he pro3ects to which the proceeds o e water standby charge will be applied. After reviewing your exemption request and the information provided by you, it has been determined that your property falls under Category 3 of the above noted exemption criteria. As you have in icated in the information substantiating your request, your property has been zoned by- the City of Huntington Beach as recreation open s_.�za�e and limited use.Acditi -nal i fn ormation recently provided by you indicates that ;while you own 25 parcels you were charged for Metropolitan's water standby charge on 11 (see attachment) . e: WATER STANDBY INFORMATION 10650 Treena Street, Suite 308 Sari Diego, CA 92131 ,r T J, -2- Since property tax bills were prepared and mailed by the County before. Metropolitan could make its determination on exempted lands, you will be required to pay the standby charge on your exempted property as indicated on your tax bill. Metropolitan will issue you a check for the exempted lands in the amount of $55. 00. You should receive a check within the next four weeks. If you have any questions regarding this matter, V please contact Administrative Analyst, David E. Buening, at (213) 353-7535. Very truly yours, Greg D. Leddy Director of Finance GDL/DEB:j g Attachment O-marou IN•�. ��a�lP7ioti/ Exemption Requested for the following 1992 APN's Assessor Parcel Number $ charged 159-393-44 $5. 00 159-393-36 $5. 00 159-393-16 $5. 00 110-213-11 $5 . 00 110-213-01 $5.00 110-212='17 $5. 00 110-212-12 $5. 00 110-211-03 $5. 00 110-153-16 $5. 00 110-152-06 -0- 110-165-04 -0- 110-163-19 $5. 00 110-163-02 -0- 110-162-01 -0- 110-161-22 -0- 110-161-20 -0- 110-161-16 -0- 110-161-12 -0- 110-161-05 -0- 110-185-02 $5. 00 110-183-10 -0- 110-183-02 -0- 110-186-17 -0- 110-186-06 -0- 110-184-03 -0- Total : $ 55 .00 1 f SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D-2 Jan 7, 1994 HOLLY SEACLIFF COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT 93-1 1. Additional Property Owners' Written Comments 2. City Attorney's Opinion, March 19, 1993 3. City Attorney's Opinion, February 3, 1994 R D-2 LAW OFFICES OF C. WILLIAM CARLSON. JR., INC. - A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION '- 2130.MAIN STREET TELEPHONE (714) 960-2411 SUITE 140 FACSIMILE (714) 960-3077 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 9 2 648-6441 February 4, 1994 City Council Members CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - FEBRUARY 7, 1994 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT Dear City Council Members: I represent Mrs. Wilvian J. Renner, 807 Frankfort Avenue, Huntington Beach, California. Mrs. Renner is the owner of a one- acre parcel of real property located on the east side of Golden West Street, South of Garfield, Parcel Number 111-130-15, within the proposed Cost Reimbursement District being considered by the Council. This property is an undeveloped acre and has located upon it a producing oil well, bringing minimal income to her. The property has been owned by Mrs. Renner for over '50 years, and has been in her family for approximately 80 years. The action being considered by the City of Huntington Beach could result in her property being encumbered with a lien of over $204, 000. She vigorously opposes the action being proposed and respectfully requests that you not approve this district. As is well known, the genesis of the Cost Reimbursement District is the Development Agreement between Holly Seacliff and the City of Huntington Beach. This Agreement was succinctly summarized in the memorandum from the City Administrator to the City Council Members of November 1, 1993 . In that memorandum the City Administrator summarizes the benefits to the major landowner which has entered into the Development Agreement with the City and the legal basis for the entering into of such agreement. As set forth in the Administrator's summary, the City will receive certain benefits from the developer in exchange for substantial benefits granted to the developer in accordance with that agreement: My client is not a party to that agreement, nor are many of the small landowners in the City of Huntington Beach whose property is located within the proposed boundary of the Cost Reimbursement District, nor is it my purpose to address the City Council Members CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Page Two February 4, 1994 merits of that agreement, either from the developer's standpoint or the city's. The thrust of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District is to enable a large landowner in the City of Huntington Beach to recover a portion of the costs from the small property owners who are neither party to that development agreement, nor will receive any substantial benefits therefrom. Yet they are being requested Q by this large landowner to help pay for the obligations that that landowner agreed to in consideration of benefits granted to it by the City. To require a small landowner such as Mrs. Wilvian Renner to help pay for the development of this large project when she neither participated in nor will receive substantial benefits from the development agreement, is an outrageous concept. I would further point out that many of these small landowners cannot develop their land, are not receiving income comparable to the theoretical value of the land, and further, in many instances, have no desire for instant development. Yet their property will be liened with huge liens to assist this large landowner in its development project. The effect of this huge lien being placed upon her property, with potential interest added thereto until such time as the property is developed, could result in her eventually losing her property as a result of this proposed action. This is highly unfair to her and others, and she again respectfully urges you to reject formation of this district. Lastly, although development agreements between cities and developers are clearly within the law as permitted by the Government Code, what is not so clear is whether or not this shifting of obligations to a non-participating party is also clearly permissible under applicable statutory provisions. In any event, whether permissible or not, it just is not proper treatment for this fine lady who is a long time property owner in Huntington Beach. Respectfully, C. WILLIAM CARLSON, JR. cc: Mrs. Wilvian Renner -Mr-,Steve-Kay, City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department �FX ?010 - - - -- - 000, �� /,/�t--C{�li�+:�. ./1..-� 1���"�:/L -�.��3� .��,•r,-Z�it-7Z 'v'-QiJt-Ga/L2—. 3 /fn • . r� � _�i -� ��'� �-[%�C�_ ��(Gl���� G`7�"\ �-tit--<J �t�-rz2 -�'-t2 y-�--�. -. 'tom' C�� G"�-+i-�.�rz-,.-�i l�—� -.�1-{, � v�-c-.bra- .� ��ti ./d� mac':z-�z.� -�-�,.�-.,r%'C���z� ,�t71� �.-� _�.c-=.,. c�-z _ /�C��.�1t�—�._ ��'�� _lam.-_�-� l-�t�s-tee ��— _ . /_l' . . ��'ti-�-1 �.��E./1��-C'z�s-ate Ali! ..G �j�ti..,y+.�wci���— .�--e- ��L.� C=may,-,,...•..��-� ��.y,.,.., .-c� �.�v�,..� �-( � �c:a�'"'l ' lives_ �✓1� ��'-Z`7..�i.�'�-�,�v�-c.• c3� n /�/��y�2,,.i,.,�'- G. �`;'f t.^--t•ti-• O'l.. iiv� /Y'�-'e� I •'`,�_ (;-z'�✓V 74 J � Zz - /Czv R � I �J- DEAR MR. MAY, 1 - 1 OWN A.P. # 111 -110-03, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 133,700. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO TflM= CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR- CONSIDERA ION, ' ELMER GOETSCH ~ l DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-211 -11 & OTHERS. THEY ARE ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 12,900. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, .. . M 1 i'EL R EZ ..-t���� . •- . .- ; 7/sI DEAR MR. MAY, 1 OWN A.P. # 110-213-02,- IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,300. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CTTY COUNCIL TJ4T I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, LOREN & VIRGINIA B ES I i DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-221-11, IT IS ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR $ 4,886. DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSMENT.DISTRICT # 93-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, KATHERINE BA IG DEAR MR. MAY, I OWN A.P. # 110-212-12 A.OTHERS. THEY ARE i ABOUT TO BE LIENED FOR'-$ 27,670. I DO NOT THINK THIS IS FAIR, JUST OR LEGAL. PLEASE EXPRESS TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT I AM OPPOSED TO REIMBURSM ENT DISTRICT # 91-1. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, rILTO, MOW! I. CITY OF. HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT-COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works FROM: Gail Hutton, City Attorney DATE: March 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement; Reimbursement Districts - RLS 93-087 BACKGROUND You have asked for advice regarding the city' s obligations under the Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement" ) . The city' s reimbursement obligations are somewhat different under the Agreement, since the supplemental facilities are required by a mutually beneficial Development Agreement, rather than required by the city's subdivision ordinance. State law permits the imposition of excess capacity improvements on a subdivision. California cities may impose by ordinance a requirement that improvements to be installed by a subdivider for the subdivision' s benefit contain supplemental size, capacity, number, or length for the benefit of property not within the subdivision. If so required, the state law further provides that the city shall enter into an agreement with the subdivider for reimbursement of the difference in cost of such supplemental capacity above the cost of the improvements necessary. to serve the subdivision. (See generally, California Government Code Section 66485 et seq. ) ISSUE 1: Is the City Council obligated under the Agreement to form a reimbursement district? Answer 1: No, the City Council is not required by the Agreement to form a reimbursement district. The formation of a reimbursement district is a discretionary legislative act that cannot be compelled by a development agreement. However, the Council is required to use its good faith best efforts to help the developer collect its reimburseable costs, to the extent allowed by law. ISSUE 2: What findings must the City Council make in order to approve or deny the formation of a district? Answer 2: There must be at least three basic findings : a. That the developer has (or has not) constructed "supplemental improvements" under the definition contained in Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 17. 68 . 020(h) ; Louis F. Sandoval _ March 19, 1993 Page 2 -b. That the properties subject to the assessment receive a benefit (or do not receive a benefit) from the supplemental improvements; and c. That the supplemental improvements are (or are not) of sufficient quantity to justify the formation of a - reimbursement district. This finding is of particular importance, because the establishment of a district may not always be necessary in order to pay the required reimburseable costs . DISCUSSION i As a general matter, the Agreement provides .for the Developer to receive its reimburseable costs, as found in Section 2.2 .4(j ) : "Upon acceptance by City of the improvements identified in Exhibit "E, " Developer is eligible for Reimburseable Costs, subject to the provisions in 2.2 . 11. " The City is obligated to help the Developer recover its reimburseable costs, pursuant to Section 2 .2 . 11(f) as follows: "The City shall use its best efforts to the extent allowed by law to obtain for Developer the maximum Reimburseable Costs available under this Sub-Section from future development served by any facility, a portion of the cost of which is reimburseable hereunder. Developer acknowledges that City is limited in the manner in which it may collect or require such reimbursement and that City may be unable to cause Developer to be reimbursed for such costs" . CITY CHOICE: Reimbursement District or Reimbursement Agreement? The establishment of a reimbursement district is a discretionary legislative act and cannot be compelled by a development agreement. The pertinent law is found in Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 17. 68 . 080(a) : "After the public hearing the City Council may, in its sole discretion, approve a resolution establishing the Cost Reimbursement District and may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer to provide for the disbursements of proceeds of the Cost Reimbursement District . " (emphasis added) Louis F. Sandoval March 19, 1993 - - Page 3 Further, Section 2 .3 . 5 of the Agreement, "Financing Infrastructure, states the following: "The City shall not . . . have the obligation to form an Assessment District, Community Facilities District or other special similar district under this Agreement. " ALTERNATIVE: Reimbursement agreement: Q - As an alternative to the establishment of a district, the city has traditionally entered into reimbursement agreements (without the establishment of Reimbursement Districts) with developers who provide supplemental or oversized public facilities. CONCLUSION: While the city is not required to form a Reimbursement District, the city still must choose a method for developer reimbursement for required excess capacity improvements. r ail Hutton City Attorney CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .p INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - - HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Steve May, Principal Engineer FROM: Gail Hutton, City Attorney DATE: January 27, 1994 SUBJECT: Holly-Seacliff Cost Reimbursement District RLS 94-027 You have asked for clarification of three issues raised in our last memo on this subject, dated March 19, 1993, under RLS 93-087. Specifically,the issues are as follows: 1. Is it necessary to establish a fee, pursuant to Government Code Section 66000, 66001, and 66002 in order to give effect to a reimbursement agreement? Answer: No. Section 66003 states that the above referenced sections expressly do not apply to "a fee imposed pursuant to a reimbursement agreement by and between a local agency and a property owner or developer" for excess capacity improvements. 2. Please clarify the statement "the City must choose a method of reimbursement for the required excess capacity improvements." Answer: The only clarification we can offer is that if the City chooses to reimburse the developer, it must decide on which method to use. If the City does not adopt the reimbursement district, the logical alternative is a reimbursement agreement. Please bear in mind, however, that the City's obligation under the Development Agreement is to use its best efforts to help the developer collect its reimbursable costs, not to provide the developer with reimbursement. Steve May Page 2 January 27, 1994 3. Does Section IV-B of the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan have effect? Would it be preempted if the City Council does not adopt a fee? Answer: We agree that language which creates a financial obligation is not generally appropriate in a land use document like a Specific Plan. However, it is also generally accepted that all legislative actions should be given meaning, and an interpretation which gives effect is preferred to one which makes-void. (Civil Code Section 3541.) Therefore, we find that this section of the Specific-Plan is effective. If the Council fails to adopt the fee, it does not invalidate the provision of the Specific Plan. It merely makes it difficult to enforce. If you have any further questions, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Gail Hutton i City Attorney RECEIVED CITY CLERK February2 1994 CITY OF HUNT►NGTs3h <r:,GH.CALIF. FEB 7 3 29 PH '94 Mayor Linda Moulton-Patterson 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Moulton-Patterson: I am 76 years old. I had planned my retirement for many years, measuring my securities as to planes stable future for my wife, children and grandchildren. I planned for any worst-case scenario possible. Your proposed Cost Reimbursement District is something I could never have planned for, let alone even dreamed of. With property values at fifty percent of what they were only three years ago, your "Fair Share" assessment works out to be more than 42% of the value of my property! I am not a developer nor am I wealthy. I cannot afford the amount proposed to be liened against my property that will have to be discounted in a sale, and still support my family. I have a question. Will the new residents write me a"thank-you" note for losing almost half of my property so that they can obliviously move into a brand new home and facilities that I paid for? I think you know that, as ridiculous as this sounds, it is in fact, only inches from the truth. This Cost Reimbursement District proposal is unethical, unfairly assessed, and the details within its body are a disgrace. I object to this proposal up for adoption by the City Council. I ask you please, to vote against this proposal, and reconsider what it will do to my family, and probably most of the others who are not"developers" but just regular people who I guess made a mistake having property in the City of Huntington Beach. With all that I have lived through, I still can't believe that something this blatantly wrong is happening at this time. Yours truly, r� Alvin R. Cohn Assessor Parcel Number: 111-110-04/ 111-110-32 (these are adjoining lots) I G . HECEIYEC STY CLcKK LAW OFFICES C+f",- `F OF HUNT!Nt;7—t . -, .� t,tt, CALIF. C. WILLIAM CARLSON, JR., INC A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 2299 lCpJ¢g+c�(7( 2130 MAIN STREET �� TELJXa4,(714) 960-2411 SUITE 140 FACSIMILE (714) 960-3077 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92G48-13"I February 4, 1994 , City Council Members CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - FEBRUARY 7 , 1994 COST REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT Dear City Council Members: I represent Mrs. Wilvian J. Renner, 807 Frankfort Avenue, Huntington Beach, California. Mrs. Renner is the owner of a one- acre parcel of real property located on the east side of Golden West Street, South of Garfield, Parcel Number 111-130-15, within the proposed Cost Reimbursement District being considered by the Council. This property is an undeveloped acre and has located upon it a producing oil well, bringing minimal income to her. The property has been owned by Mrs. Renner for over 50 years, and has been in her family for approximately 80 years. The action being considered by the City of Huntington Beach could result in her property being encumbered with a lien of over $204, 000. She vigorously opposes the action being proposed and respectfully requests that you not approve this district. As is well known, the genesis of the Cost Reimbursement District is the Development Agreement between Holly Seacliff and the City of Huntington Beach. This Agreement was succinctly summarized in the memorandum from the City Administrator to the City Council Members of November 1, 1993 . In that memorandum the City Administrator summarizes the benefits to the major landowner which has entered into the Development Agreement with the City and the legal basis for the entering into of such agreement. As set forth in the Administrator's summary, the City will receive certain benefits from the developer in exchange for substantial benefits granted to the developer in accordance with that agreement. My client is not a party to that agreement, nor are many of the small landowners in the City of Huntington Beach whose property is located within the proposed boundary of the Cost Reimbursement District, nor is it my purpose to address the ^ / t/ City Council Members CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Page Two February 4, 1994 merits of that agreement, either from the developer's standpoint or the city's. The thrust of the proposed Cost Reimbursement District is to enable a large landowner in the City of Huntington Beach to recover a portion of the costs. from the small property owners who are neither party to that development agreement, nor will receive any substantial benefits therefrom. Yet they are being requested by this large landowner to help pay for the obligations that that landowner agreed to in consideration of benefits granted to it by the City. To require a small landowner such as Mrs. Wilvian Renner to help pay for the development of this large project when she neither participated in nor will receive substantial benefits from the development agreement, is an outrageous concept. I would further point out that many of these small landowners cannot develop their land, are not receiving income comparable to the theoretical value of the land, and further, in many instances, have no desire for instant development. Yet their property will be liened with huge liens to assist this large landowner in its development project. The effect of this huge lien being placed upon her property, with potential interest added thereto until such time as the property is developed, could result in her eventually losing her property as a result of this proposed action. This is highly unfair to her and others, and she again respectfully urges you to reject formation of this district. Lastly, although development agreements between cities and developers are clearly within the law as permitted by the Government Code, what is not so clear is whether or not this shifting of obligations to a non-participating party is also clearly permissible under applicable statutory provisions. In any event, whether permissible or not, it just is not proper treatment for this fine lady who is a long time property owner in Huntington Beach. Respectfully, C. WILLIAM CAR SON, JR cc: Mrs. Wilvian Renn r Mr. Steve May, City of Huntington Beach, Public Works Department 4 i ��ftPartnm Homes and U.W.C.Development Corp. February 7, 1994 Mr. Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator Administration Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Subject: Cost Reimbursement District 93-1 Dear Mr. Uberuaga: I have received a copy of Steve May's memo to you dated February 4, 1994 stating that the project engineer responsible for preparation of the Engineer's Report for the proposed district has had an emergency and will be unable to make a presentation to the City Council at tonight's meeting. Under these circumstances, we concur with staff and recommend that the public hearing on this item be continued to your next regular meeting of February 22, 1994. Sincerely, William D. Holman Project Manager cc: Ray Silver Louis F. Sandoval Steve May Connie Brockway Gail Hutton Robert Eichblatt Pat Dapkus 0 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, CA 90401 (310) 394-3379 Fax (310) 394-6872 0 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 721-9777 Fax (714) 729-1214 .E.UlWALH. MarowF `''`T"�6*N. Bundy Dr. (310)472-1697 j� u'Li s'An`gelesiXalifornia 90049 FEB 7 3 29 Pry °9q City of.Huntington Beach FFEB .- P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 71994 AttentionUnda Multon Patterson CITY OF HUNTINOTON BEACH Mayor Pro-Tem ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Re: RPimbursemeint District (93-1).EXPI*�pti P_ Erc�yclope za I:otV 0159=39?-3E.. ud.cf jers- For 60 years our family has held these lots which we had hoped to sell,to finance our retirement. This fee will render sale economically unfeasible. Fee 35% of Lot Value: The city appraisal places $10,000 value on a single encyclopedia lot, and the fee is $3,493.00 which you will agree is absurd! UJ00% Value Penalty: Down zoning restrictions, open space, limited use, and sensitive areohave depressed our values to the extreme. 3 encyclopedia lots of 8,400sq.ft. according to the city, has $30.000 value, compared to an identical sized estate lot next door at over 300 000; 10 to 1. $10,479.00 Fee is proposed on our down zoned triple lot in Fairview addition, and it cannot be developed, according to the city, indefinitely. Why should we small lot owners finance gairAdevelopers creating further detrimental economics to us? Infrastructure benefits the city, as a whole. Let the city fiance it, with the developer. Sincerel . Milton H. Marow P.S. Please present: I. our opposition to the fee; II. request for exemption of encyclopedia lots. .Y