HomeMy WebLinkAboutPPSA 89-3 - ND 89-36 - Walnut Ave. between Main St. and Sixt F-V
ORDINANCE NO. 3027
I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING
i THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADOPTING PRECISE
PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3 ALIGNING WALNUT AVENUE
BETWEEN MAIN. STREET AND SIXTH STREET
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Government Code, the
Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice
duly given, held a public hearing to consider Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No . 89-3 ; and
After notice duly given, hearing was held before the City
Council, and the matter having been considered, the City Council
finds that Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 is reasonably
necessary to assure the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for
the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the
City, and for the orderly development of the community and downtown
redevelopment area; and
Planning Commission and City Council recognize the concerns of
residents regarding preservation of significant historical structures
and the impacts of traffic and development in the downtown area .
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1 . District Map 12 (Sectional District Map 11-6-11) ,
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is
hereby amended to include Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 ,
to reduce the ultimate right-of-way on Walnut Avenue between Main
Street and Sixth Street from 80 feet to 60 feet .
SECTION 2 . The real property designated as Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 89-3 is more particularly described in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference .
SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after
its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Huntington Beach at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of November, 1989 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
e�r� /
City Clerk � City Attorney Z, k%.w)-Yq
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED A D APPROVED:
jVtj_ -
City Administrator D r for -61 Community
Development
2 - 3027
r
Ut'd, No, 3027
STATE OF CA'II"ORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ` ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S
I , CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-offirio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular
meeting therof held on the 4th day of December
19.89 _, and was again read to said City Council at a regular adjourned
meeting therof held on the 22nd day of January 1,990 , al"d
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of
all the members of said City Council .
AYES: Councilmembers:
MacAllister, Green, Mays, Bannister, Erskine
NOES: Councilmembers:
Winchell , Silva
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
; < of Huntington Beach, California
>i
r. Publish 11/22/89
€ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36
(TO REDUCE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH ON WALNUT
AVENUE FROM 80 FEET TO 60 FEET BETWEEN
MAIN STREET AND SIXTH STREET)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on
the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, December 4 , 1989 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal - Precise Plan of Street Alignment No .
89-3/Negative Declaration No . 89-36
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Community
Development
APPELLANT: Councilman Tom Mays
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and Main Street
ZONE : Downtown Specific Plan Districts 3 , 4a, 4b, 5a, and 5b
REQUEST: Appeal of Planning Commission' s decision to take no
action on a request to reduce the ultimate right-of-way
width on Walnut Avenue from 80 feet to 60 feet between
Main Street and Sixth Street .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No . 89-36 ,
which the Council will also consider .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by
the public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If . there are any further questions please call
Laura Phillips , Associate Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
714/536-5227
(4048d)
=Ell''-C \/ // / C Jan _ _w /•/♦
' A' /\! ,, �� it i CC `�CCC � ; -
Ll
:C� ,• � r C-. CC CC�CL-C
ffiN
�T 0 E
L A g E
E
00 a�
0- C •!I [j / MH-FP-,
00 --,� <1 ]
0
R 2-PD-CZ-FP2
z
D
k r C Jur
R2-PCICZ:
,cl
O,S°e $'Lj. O, �� \ a N N -:�t.hc6.a,'........ .....�"-xl a,
R2-P'O-r-Z-FP2
ry
zi n R2--O-CiLF
lsT c DOWNTOWIJ SPECIFIC Pr°x.
>
t
R2-PD-C*Z"F'P2 /0
< o)ISTq'CT-i8c.j
4
Pb,
-0
\" ,
R2-PO-CZ-
R2-f'D-CZ fln
OZ
'c/ uk, /w 'i
o/ 4;� ?/c. R2-PD-Cyz)•pZ
P2-PD-CZ-FP2
�:�\�'MWCZ-FP2 Q. .
41" R2-PD-CZ-FP`2
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3 0
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36
HLINTU4GTON REACH
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
C�nMM,s"! , -51 oN DN
APPEAL^- PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT
NO. 89-3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36
(TO REDUCE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH ON WALNUT
AVENUE FROM 80 FEET TO 60 FEET BETWEEN
MAIN STREET AND SIXTH STREET)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach. City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on
the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, December 4 , 1989 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal - Precise Plan of Street Alignment No .
89-3/Negative Declaration No . 89-36
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Community
Development
APPELLANT: Councilman Tom Mays
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and Main Street
ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan Districts 3 , 4a, 4b, 5a, and 5b
REQUEST: Appeal of Planning Commission' s decision to take no
action on a request to reduce the ultimate right-of-way
width on Walnut Avenue from 80 feet to 60 feet between
Main Street and Sixth Street .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No . 89-36 ,
which the Council will also consider .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by
the public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Laura Phillips, Associate Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
714/536-5227
(4048d)
GCG� ze'/
lish 10/26/89
G U
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36
(Walnut Avenue Ultimate Right-of-Way)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chambe at a Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Bea California, on the
date and at the time indicated below t re i e and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to ' and relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, November 61, 1989 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise P1 n of Street Alignment No . 89-3
NegativoXeclaration No . 89-36
APPLICANT: City of Hun ''ton Beach, Community Development
Depa ent/
LOCATION: Wal u A e e between Sixth Street and Lake Street
ZONE: Downtowl Sp cific Plan-Districts 3 , 4a, 4b, 5a and 5b
REQUEST: Reduce t ultimate right-of-way width of Walnut Avenue
from 80 feet to 60 feet minimum between Sixth Street and
Main Street .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This action is covered by Negative
Declaration No . 89-36, which will also be considered
by Council .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Laura Phillips, Associate Planner, at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
714/536-5227
(3930d)
00
RI
00 OLL
LUJU��JJ
f All
t •.Df• r ' ( n
. . .� �r I
W
b 'SPECIfU ADSTRI
-
�r aa�a&LIJ
M H-FP2
• '� •� h �' � 3 � I" rr�a II:•ro•crrn �
,+ m
�NYy •'f' t'77_Y ji •fP2 ' x
4f c.• •Yf tt1 hh .:Itr/jw�.• I :.xr.
t Qpf +�v •Cow.' , .c..; I u Y.
- 'Jt.,o'• �'.tj ' q •••� �J;.• tH j' Mr .. S c ��r.r~n t;...^"'�Rl.::;•t,'1 '
// Q•C�,➢f'CR J'� 00wNTOW4 S➢61C PON. � �� •��TTffL 'r•........
aJIST IiC1.Bo r ,•^ aC !:^•'.�11rjS ' R2•►o•C2'FP2 m
01
/7C, rir!•;'\� Cb .Q JiD( . lA'.•• �Rr•�:.::;••.
y flgiC cr� � �..:1F•b ,\..
R2 ..r...
-'• 40{2'fP ••• R2•iD•C
t� •! /'p MN•CZ-FP2 .N. I 1•+.'rr.
•^a j is 451
DCmm10wN SMCIrIC 1LA4-0
Precise Plan of Street Al i gnme o. 89-3 HUNT04CT0N IWH*
i
I '
tl
_...-..,.._. __...-r...._. . .
AulhOn26d to Publish A0v9rI1S0f`nC;nt3 Of tail It' ,include Public
notices by Discroe of the Superior Court of Orange County,
California. Number A-6214. dated 29 SODlembsr. 1961. and
A44931. dated 11 June. 1963
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange v„a.c wonca A010tb++p—00
Dt x,.r M 0"1 to eat M r pop
with tQ pica tdwnn,steth
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I•am over the age of eighteen
years. and not a party to or interested in the below PUBLIC NOTICE
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange THIS'HEARING
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the " CANCELLED
TO.BE RESCHEDULED.
12/4/89
NEWS-PRESS. a newspaper of general Circulation, ASAP,PEAL-
"`FILED BY ""
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, COUNCILMAN TOM MAYS
NOTICE OF
County of Orange, State of California, and that a PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN:-
Notice of Public Hearing 'ALIGNMENT STREET
0.89-3
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION'
NO.89-36
(Walnut Avenue'
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete ultimate
Right-of-Way)
copy, was printed-and-published_in..the_Costa-.Mesa, NOTICE IS HEREBYI
GIVEN that the.Huntington
Beach.City Council will hold
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, a public hearing in the Coun i
cil Chamber at the Hunt-I
Irvine.- the South Coast communities and Laguna ington Beach Civic.Centeri
1 time 2000, Main Street, Hunt'
Beach issues of said newspaper for ington'Beach,California, one
the'date and at the time in-
consecutive weeks to wit'the issue(s) of dicated below to receive and
consider the statements of
all persons who wish to be
heard relative to the appli=
cation described below.
DATE/TIME:Monday,No-
vember 6,-1989,7:00 PM
November 2 198 g •APPLICATION "NUMBER:
Precise Plan of Street Align-
mentNo.89-3 Negative Dec-
laration No.89-36
t 98 1 APPLICANT:City of Hunt-
ington" Beach, Community
Development Department
'LOCATION: Walnut Av-
198 enue between Sixth Street
and Lake Street,
ZONE:Downtown Specific
Plan-Districts 3, 4a,-4b;5a
198 and 5b .
REQUEST:Reduce the"ul-
timate right-of-way width of
Walnut Avenue from 80 feet
19$ to 60 feet minimum between
Sixth Street and- Main
Street.,
ENVIR•O'NMENTAL
STATUS:This action is cov-
ered by Negative Declar-
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the ation No. 89-36, which also
will be considered by Coun-
foregoing is true and correct. cil.
ON'FILE: a copy of the
proposed request is on file in
the Community. Develop-
ment 'Department,•.2000
Executed on November 2 , 19$ 9 Main, Street, Huntington
Beach,California 92648,for
at Costa Mesa, California.�.. inspection
n pe ti n by the
T public.SONS are invited to attend
said public hearing and,ex-
press opinions or submit
Signature evidence for or against the
application as outlined
above. If there are any
further questions please,call
LIP
Laura Phillips, Associate
Planner at 536-5271.
1 Connie Brockway,;City
it Clark,,714/536-5227
Published Orange Coast
Daily, Pilot November' 2,
1989
`Th873
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
.FUMCATICE ( PUBWNOTIO I PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE
$Q' `E OF PUBLIC HEARING H
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. •89-3
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36
(Walnut Avenue Ultimate Right-of-Way)
' ill
NOTICE_ IS. HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City .Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber - at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street; Huntington Beach, California, on the.
date and at the time indicated below to . receibe and consider the
statements ,of; all persons who wish to be heard relative .to the "N
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, : November_ 6, 1989, 7:00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise -Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 y„
Negative Declaration No,. 89-36
APPLICANT:, y of Huntington Beach, -Community Development
Dep tment
LOCATION: Walnut nue between Sixth* ,Street and Lake Street �ryV
ZONE: Downtown Specifi lan-Districts '3; 4•a, 4b, 5a and 5b, _
REOUESTi , Reduce the ultimate r ht-of-way width of Walnut Avenue
from 80 feet to 60 feet ini'mum between Sixth Street and
Main: Street.
ENVIRONMENTAL 'STATUS: This action is vered by Negative
Declaration No. 8 36, which also will, be considered
•by Council . ,
ON FILE: A copy. of, the proposed request is o file in the
Community Development Department, 200 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, .California 92648i .for "nspection by the sa
public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said heari and .
express opinions ,or submit evidence .for or against the ap lication
as outlined above. If there are' any further questions ple a call-
Laura Phillips, Associate Planner, at 536-5271.
Connie Brockway;
City Clerk
l , 714/536-5227 J
' a1
1 v LLLUJJJLLLL JJJJ LLLL...JJJJLLLLJJJJ
ti w i SP(D�TR
•M / I d
. ' I -I .
01
1
�,\4� w '� • ' N MH-FP2 1 7n
•� o •are•crrrc �
• • 4 ' ` � � �• ,� ,�) ,. � it
C qf,• Y / i r.wfj lq ,'irrrit ii x!D
r t i�.` . r' l'If., i ��' !)••pw w e:•ro•crm
. ! / •4J•41T. • 00NNTONV S►C�l/1C R'IM � . •r ry .' —,-�
+rP"h• cps a .)• f l � r',�`.VS..�.:."::::'�'j :�
i w� ti ,. JIST ICT 4 •. •� t�'�� ;',u..71Ai r.I 112•ro•errr!
/' •/ R{y°A ••p `�tH, R?OQ►► i 112-ro•CI'Y1r '
"'S"•..� Wyk 'af��w�ca ti:F•I -``• _ `•4r1•.:::M{....,,wlwt.:::::• .�`i
Az.F
r�ryS02 O�w '► `� MN•CZ•FV2 !fw•A . ~I I.i.11l _'
i.• �'F y - •0'DftmoNN MCI►IC►LAM-� • '
• a.rl
,
Precise Plan of Street Ali:gnman Flo. 89-3 Ze 10MSUCH•
ea
Aulhorizod 10 Publish Advarlisemonts of all kinds includinC public
nohces by Decree of the Superior Court of orange ounty,
California. Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961-.and
A-24831, dated 11 June. 1963. r
.STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange nubw "Do" •e.6^b'^o co.Wee _
by n.o eRb.wl n rr /n 7 pond.
aim to PC&cok~.wad
I am a Citizen of the Upited States and a resident of
the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or interested in the below
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk. of the Orange
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa,
County of Orange. State of California, and that a
Notice of - Public Hearing
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa,
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley,
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna
Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 time
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of
October 26 198 9
198
198
198
198
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 26 198 9
at Costa Mesa, California.
Signature
315,00
PROnF OF PUBLICATION!
REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date December 4, 1989
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator��ej2___-
Prepared by: Mike Adams, Director, Community Developme t
Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3/NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 89-36
30o2
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE•
Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street
_ Alignment No. 89-3 (to reduce the ultimate right-of-way on Walnut
1 Avenue from 80 feet to 60 feet, between Main Street and Sixth
Street. The Planning Commission did not act on the request,
choosing to maintain their previous recommendation of an 80 foot
right-of-way. This item was appealed by Councilman Mays .
Councilman Mays feels that a 60 foot right-of-way should be
considered based on projected traffic volumes on Walnut Avenue,
impacts on downtown redevelopment projects and previous. City Council
actions .
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission Action:
ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY ORTEGA, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ON OCTOBER 17, 1989, CHOSE TO TAKE NO ACTION ON PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-36,
THEREBY NOT CHANGING OR RESCINDING THEIR ACTION ON PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 88-3 TO MAINTAIN AN 80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Williams, Ortega, Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon,
Mountford, Leipzig
_ NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Plo 5/85
o _
Staff Recommendation;
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Negative Declaration
No . 89-36 and adopt Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 by
ordinance, subject to the following findings :
1. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 to reduce the
right-of-way of Walnut from 80 feet to 60 feet between Main and
Sixth Streets will provide for orderly and efficient flow of
traffic through the Downtown Core Area by means of two travel
lanes with or without turning pockets, four travel lanes with no
turning pockets, or by three travel lanes with left-turn pockets .
2 . The reduction in ultimate right-of-way width proposed by Precise
Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 will promote the orderly and
timely development of projects in the Redevelopment Area.
3 . The proposed Precise Plan of Street Alignment to create a
modified secondary arterial meets the objectives of the
Circulation and Coastal Elements of the General Plan and the
objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan.
ANALYSIS:
On October 17, 1989 , the Planning Commission decided to take no
action on the subject request. They felt that their action on
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 88-3 on January 18, 1989, to
maintain the 80 foot width of Walnut Avenue between Lake and Sixth
Streets still expressed their current desire. Therefore, they took
no action to change or rescind that prior action. This item has
been appealed to the City Council for consideration.
The following is a summary of the Planning Commission' s and City
Council ' s past actions regarding Walnut Avenue between Lake and
Sixth Streets :
May 15, 1984 The Planning Commission recommended approval of
Circulation Element Amendment No . 84-1,
redesignating Walnut Avenue from a local street
to a secondary arterial between Sixth and Lake
Streets, and extending Walnut Avenue as a
primary arterial from Lake Street to Beach
Boulevard. A secondary arterial calls for an
80 foot right-of-way. The City Council
approved Circulation Element Amendment No . 84-1
on June 4 , 1984 .
September 22, 1986 The Planning Commission approved Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No. 86-1, establishing an
80 foot right-of-way for Walnut Avenue between
Sixth and Lake Streets . This would require a
10 foot dedication on each side of Walnut
Avenue at the time of new development. The
City Council approved Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No . 86-1 on October 27, 1986 .
RCA 12/4/89 -2- (3941d)
January 18, 1989 The Planning Commission denied Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 88-3, a request to reduce
the ultimate right-of-way on Walnut Avenue from
80 feet to 60 feet in some areas between Lake
and Sixth Streets. Additional 10 foot
dedication was proposed for projects involving
full block consolidation. Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 88-3 was not reviewed by
the City Council .
September 18, 1989 The City Council approved the Main Pier Phase
II Development Concept for the blocks bounded
by Main Street, Pacific Coast Highway, Sixth
Street and Walnut Avenue. The development
concept depicts a 60 foot right-of-way for
Walnut Avenue between Main Street and Sixth
Street. The Council directed Redevelopment
staff to proceed with negotiations with
owners/developers based on this concept.
October 17, 1989 The Planning Commission took no action on
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3, a
request to reduce the ultimate right-of-way on
Walnut Avenue to 60 feet between Main and Sixth
Streets .
The Public Works Department has provided the two most recent studies
prepared by Greer and Company for the Downtown core area . A summary
of the reports ' conclusions includes : a figure depicting projected
daily traffic volumes in the Downtown Core for the year 2010, and a
proposed striping plan for Walnut Avenue between Sixth and Lake
Streets . This information is attached to the Planning Commission
staff report dated October 17, 1989 . The traffic studies account
for the downscaled, or village concept plan of development, and the
existing City Circulation Plan, including the Hamilton extension and
the realignment of Sixth and Lake Streets . The proposed striping
plan shows a 60 foot right-of-way between Sixth Street and Main
Street, and an 80 foot right-of-way between Main Street and Lake
Street except at the location of the Standard Market at the
southeast corner of Main Street and Walnut Avenue.
The Greer Traffic Study indicates a projected ultimate traffic
volume on Walnut Avenue between Main Street and Sixth Street of only
4, 000 vehicles per day. The traffic capacity for Walnut Avenue at
its current width and striping (two lanes without turn pockets) is
6, 000 vehicles per day at a very comfortable level of service C
(stable flow) . At its current width and striping, Walnut Avenue
would operate at level of service A (free flow) between Main Street .
and Sixth Street after total buildout of the downtown specific
plan. There is no justification based on ultimate projected traffic
volumes to widen Walnut Avenue to 80 feet between Main Street and
Sixth Street.
RCA 12/4/89 -3- (3941d)
Even at its current width, the Public Works Traffic Section has
suggested three alternative cross-section designs which could
increase traffic capacity within 60 feet if that ever became
necessary. Walnut Avenue could be designed with a 10 foot striped
center lane for left turn movements, two 17 foot travel lanes and 8
foot sidewalks . If necessary, two alternative striping designs
could be installed at a later date. The first alternative would
feature two 10 foot and two 12 foot travel lanes with 8 foot
sidewalks . An ultimate striping plan would feature two lanes in one
direction, one lane in the other direction, and an off-center left
turn pocket which may be implemented after the predominant direction
of traffic flow is determined. It is remote that either of the last
two alternatives would ever become necessary.
In response to the Planning Commission' s inquiries, the
Redevelopment Agency has outlined the structures along this section
of Walnut Avenue to which significant monetary and other commitments
have been made. Redevelopment staff indicates that over $300,000
have been committed by the Agency to the Shank House (202 Fifth) and
to the Mazotti ' s building (412 Walnut) . Both of these buildings are
historically significant, and are located within the existing 80
foot ultimate right-of-way width. Additionally, the Agency is
working with the Worthy' s to rehabilitate the historically
significant structures at 120 Sixth Street. These structures are
also within the 80 foot ultimate right-of-way. Since street
dedication is only obtained at the time of new construction, not
rehabilitation, it is unlikely that a full 80 feet could be obtained
along this portion of Walnut Avenue.
On December 12, 1988 the City Council approved in concept a
demonstration project including facade rehabilitation and new
construction in the block bounded by Walnut Avenue, Main Street,
Olive Avenue and Fifth Street. The implementing Conditional Use
Permit and Coastal Development Permit, along with the accompanying
Environmental Impact Report, are now pending before the City Council
on appeal . If the Walnut right-of-way remains at 80 feet along the
demonstration block, it is likely that property owners facing Walnut
will consider minor facade rehabilitation of existing buildings
only, since any substantial reconstruction or rehabilitation would
trigger additional right-of-way dedication and render the
twenty-five (25) foot wide lots unbuildable. This would apply to
both corners of Walnut Avenue and Main Street.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,
the Department posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-36 for ten
days, and no comments either verbal or written were received. The
staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a
negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No. 89-3, it is necessary for the City Council
to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 89-36 .
RCA 12/4/89 -4- (3941d)
FUNDING SOURCE:
Not applicable
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Direct staff accordingly
ATTACHMENTS
1. Appeal letter from Councilman Mays dated October 27, 1989
2 . Draft Ordinance adopting Precise Plan of Street Alignment No.
89-3
3 . Negative Declaration No. 89-36
4 . Staff Report dated October 17, 1989 (with Attachments)
a. Walnut Avenue Traffic Analysis
1. Projected 2010 Traffic Volumes
2. Striping Plan
3 . April 4, 1989 Greer & Co. Study
4 . May 12, 1988 Greer & Co. Study
b. Memo from Keith Bohr, Redevelopment
C. Historic structure location map
d. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 3, 1989
5 . Staff Report dated October 3, 1989 (with Attachments)
a . Street Sections
b. Area Map
C. Resolutions
6 . Letter to Mayor Bannister from Roger Torriero
MA:LP: lab
RCA 12/4/89 -5- (3941d)
Precise Alignment of Walnut Avenue
Sixth Street to Main Street
A strip of land 60.00 feet in width; the centerline being described as
follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Walnut Avenue, a 60.00
feet wide street, and the centerline of Sixth Street; a 75.00 feet wide
street, as shown on the Map of Huntington Beach, recorded in Book 3, Page
36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder; thence
South 48° 40' East 635.00 feet along the centerline of Walnut Avenue to
a point on the centerline of Main Street, a 75.00 feet wide street as
shown on said map of Huntington Beach, said point being the terminus
of the described centerline.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Vp" CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To From
CONNIE BROCKWAY, City Clerk Tom Mays
Councilman
Subject precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 Date October 27, 1989
Negative Declaration No. 89-36, Walnut Avenue-
Ultimate Right-of-Way
I hereby appeal the action of the Planning Commission on the subject matter at their
October 17, 1989 meeting for the following reasons:
1. Projected traffic volumes on Walnut Avenue, between Main Street and 6th Street, do
not justify widening from a 60 foot to an 80 foot right-of-way.
2. A requirement of 10 foot dedication of additional right-of-way on each side of
Walnut between Main Street and 6th Street will negatively affect downtown
redevelopment projects including the Main-Pier Phase II Project and the Second
Block Rehabilitation Project.
3. The City Council has previously approved by a unanimous vote to retain the current
60 foot right-of-way for Walnut Street, between Main Street and 6th Street.
Please schedule this matter for the December 4, 1989 City Council meeting.
TM:bb
cc: Mayor and City Council
City Administrator
Mike Adams, Director-Community Development
n =
r�
-� <�cMM
GO
n
r
t� T
lob 105 2af
--......... _..
I WKLNVT '.._ .G
—r-- I�� -- -=o - -r— f�VE
I e C335 Crow) ... .v
I
r—
lob l05 -- lot
75� -15l
I I
F't�CIFIC g CON5T HWY.
REVISIONS REFERENCES
WALNVT NV[`, 461
(K6L�L i n.M N0 T
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH secerxa I or3
ocrurcuctrt a rve�rc waeRs
i s
.. _; "--,r -fir•.
JLJ ' - CITY OF HUNTINGTON - BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To File From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
SECTION
Subject ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Date September 22, 1989
FORM NO. 89-36
Applicant: City of Huntington Beach
Request: To reduce the ultimate right of way width of Walnut Avenue between
Main and 6th Streets.
Location: Walnut Avenue betwen Main and 6th Streets.
Background
Staff has reviewed the environmental information form noted above and has determined
that a negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this, a draft negative
declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot and posted in the Office of
the City Clerk for a ten (10) day public review period commencing September 22, 1989
and ending October 2, 1989. If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are
received, you will be notified immediately..
Recommendation
The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Negative Declaration No. 89-36 finding that the proposed project will not have a
significant adverse effect on the environment.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura Phillips
Associate Planner
LP:lab
(3708d)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent City of Huntington Beach
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92683. (714) 536-5271
3. Date of Checklist Submitted September 22, 1989
4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Huntington Beach
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Environmental Assessment No. 89-36:
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-2
II. Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.)
Yes Ma- be. No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes
in geologic substructures? X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil? X
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? X
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? X
Yes Maybe No
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of•ambient air quality? X
b. The creation of objectionable odors? X
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? X
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff? X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters? X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in
any water body? X
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in—
cluding but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters? X
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with—
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public_ water
supplies? X
i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves? X
Environmental Checklist —2— (3708d)
Yes Maybe No
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? X
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? X
d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural
crop? X
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? X
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare? X
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area? X
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? X
Environmental Checklist —3— (3708d)
Yes Maybe No
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X.
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? X
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? X
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing? X
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? X
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor-
tation systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
Environmental Checklist -4- (3708d)
Yes Maybe No
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? X
f. Other governmental services? X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist—
ing source of energy, or require the
development of sources of energy? X
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or substantial alterations to
the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X
b. Communication systems? X
c. Water? X _
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X
e. Storm water drainage? X
f. Solid waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? X
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? X
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result in
the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Environmental Checklist —5— (3708d)
Yes Maybe No
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site? X
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object? X
c. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area? X
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild-
life population to drop below self sustain-
ing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory? X
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, defini-
tive period of time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the future.) X
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant.) X
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X
Environmental Checklist -6- (3708d)
III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
IV. Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
September 22, 1989
Date nature
For zommr.G/UfL1 ��G9�t7✓tl�.YLT
Environmental Checklist -7- (3708d)
gington beach department of community development
sra f f
EPOR
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Community Development
DATE: October 17 , 1989
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3/ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 89-36 (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3 , 1989
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING)
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: Reduction of ultimate right-of-way width for Walnut
Avenue, from 80 feet to 60 feet
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Main and Sixth Streets
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No . 89-36 and Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3
and recommend adoption by the City Council .
2,.J ENERAL INFORMATION:
This item was continued to the October 17, 1989 Planning Commission
meeting in order to. allow staff to further analyze potential project
impacts . The following is a summary of the Planning Commission' s
past actions regarding Walnut Avenue between Lake and Sixth Streets
since 1984 :
May 15, 1984 The Planning Commission recommended approval of
Circulation Element Amendment No . 84-1,
redesignating Walnut Avenue from a local street
to a secondary arterial between Sixth and Lake
Streets, and extending Walnut Avenue as a
primary arterial from Lake Street to Beach
Boulevard. A secondary arterial calls for an 80
foot right-of-way. The City Council approved
Circulation Element Amendment No . 84-1 on June
4 , 1984 .
September 22, 1986 The Planning Commission approved Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 86-1, establishing an 80
foot right-of-way for Walnut Avenue between
Sixth and Lake Streets . This would require a 10
foot dedication on each side of Walnut Avenue at
the time of new development . The City Council
approved Precise Plan of Street Alignment No .
86-1 on October 27, 1986 .
A-FM-23C
i,
January 18 , 1989 The Planning Commission denied Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 88-3 , a request to reduce
the ultimate right-of-way on Walnut Avenue from
80 feet to 60 feet in some areas between Lake and
Sixth Streets . Additional 10 foot dedication was
proposed for projects involving full block
consolidation . Precise Plan of Street Alignment
No . 88-3 was not reviewed by the City , Council .
October 3 , 1989 The Planning Commission continued Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 89-3 , a request to reduce
the ultimate right-of-way on Walnut Avenue from
80 feet to 60 feet between Main Street and Sixth
Street .
3-,9 __ANALYSIS:
The Planning Commission requested additional information regarding
traffic studies that have been completed with regard to the Downtown
Core Area . The Public Works Department has provided the two most
recent studies prepared by Greer and Company, along with a summary
of the reports ' conclusions , a figure depicting projected daily
traffic volumes in the Downtown Core for the year 2010 , and a
proposed striping plan for Walnut Avenue between Sixth and Lake
Streets . The traffic studies do account for the existing City
Circulation Plan, including the Hamilton extension and the
realignment of Sixth and Lake Streets . The proposed striping plan
shows a 60 foot right-of-way between Sixth and Main Street, and an
80 foot right-of-way between Main and Lake Street except at the
location of the Standard Market at the southeast corner of Main
Street and Walnut Avenue.
In response to the Planning Commission' s inquiries , the
Redevelopment Agency has outlined the structures along this section
of Walnut Avenue to which significant monetary and other commitments
have been made. The attached memo from Keith Bohr of Redevelopment
indicates that over $300, 000 have been committed by the Agency to
the Shank House (202 Fifth) and to the Mazotti ' s building (412
Walnut) . Both of these buildings are historically significant, and
are located within the existing 80 foot ultimate right-of-way
width. Additionally, the Agency is working with the Worthy' s to
rehabilitate the historically significant structures at 120 Sixth.
Street . These structures are also within the 80 foot ultimate
right-of-way. Attachment No . 3 of this report depicts the location
of these structures along Walnut Avenue.
Since street dedication is only obtained at the time of new
construction, not rehabilitation, it is unlikely that a full 80 feet
could be obtained along this portion of Walnut Avenue for decades .
Staff Report - 10/17/89 -2- (3833d)
4 . 0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning . Commission approve Negative
Declaration No . 89-36 , adopt Resolution No. 1421 approving Precise
Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 , and recommend adoption by the
City Council , subject to the following findings :
k I,tvDINGS._kQk�_..AURQV.AL:
1 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 to reduce the
right-of-way of Walnut from 80 feet to 60 feet between Main and
Sixth Streets will provide for orderly and efficient flow of
traffic through the Downtown Core Area by means of two travel
lanes with turning pockets , four travel lanes with no turning
pockets, or by three travel lanes with left-turn pockets .
2 . The reduction in ultimate right-of-way width proposed by
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 will promote the
orderly and timely development of projects in the Redevelopment
Area .
3 : The proposed Precise Plan of Street Alignment to create a
modified secondary arterial meets the objectives of the
Circulation and Coastal Elements of the General Plan and the
objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan.
5., 0 ..__AL.' U.JINA_1YF ACTION.:
Direct staff accordingly.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. . Walnut Avenue Traffic Analysis
a . Projected 2010 Traffic Volumes
b. Striping Plan
C. April 4 , 1989 Greer & Co . Study
d . May 12, 1988 Greer & Co . Study
2 . Memo from Keith Bohr, Redevelopment
3 . Historic structure location map
4 . Planning Commission staff report dated October 3 , 1989
HS:LP: kla
Staff Report - 10/17/89 -3- (3833d)
WALNUT AVENUE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
MAIN STREET TO 6TH STREET .
BACKGROUND
The City has retained the firm of Greer and Company to analyze the downtown street
system for various land uses proposed for the Downtown Specific Plan. Greer and
Company prepared their initial study in August, 1983 followed by up-dates in May, 1988
and in April, 1989. The up-dates reflect changes in the Downtown Specific Plan uses to
less intense densities.
MAY. 1988 STUDY
The May, 1988 "up-date study" analyzed future (year 2010) traffic volumes on Walnut
Avenue. The study concluded:
"The loop system of Orange, Lake, Walnut and Sixth will be widened to provide four
lanes with left turn lanes and medians and with no on-street parking. Walnut Avenue
should be widened to the proposed 60-foot roadway in an 80-foot right of way, but
projected traffic volumes may not require four operational travel lanes for its entire
length. For operational needs, four lanes should be provided with no on-street
parking on Walnut between Main Street and Lake Street. This section of Walnut
provides direct access to the proposed entertainment.center project and to the City's
proposed parking structure. Between Sixth Street and Main Street, it may be possible
to configure Walnut with two lanes, left turn lanes and a median, and permit
on-street parking on both sides until such time as the four travel lanes may be
required. At that time, the on-street parking could be removed to provide the four
travel lanes. There is some hesitancy in suggesting the two lane section on Walnut.
between Sixth and Main although it would operate acceptably under projected traffic
volumes. In order to emphasize the loop arterial system and to provide its continuity
and clear designation to the driver, it would be appropriate to improve Walnut as four
lanes from Sixth to Lake right from the start. The difficulty of subsequently
removing the on-street parking after it is once installed in order to ultimately
provide the four travel lanes would be avoided if improved as four lanes initially."
Although projected traffic volumes for Walnut Avenue did not actually indicate a need for a
four lane arterial, between Main Street and 6th Street, Greer and Company felt the
conservative approach would be to require 80 feet of right-of-way and provide four travel lanes
anyway. Engineering staff supported that conservative approach.
APRIL. 1989 STUDY
A year later Greer and Company was asked to analyze the traffic impacts of further density
reductions in the downtown area. They concluded that daily trips would be reduced by
approximately 12.5%. Their projected average daily traffic volume estimates are attached.
The Planning Commission has become accustomed to the following standards for level of
service C or better traffic volumes on arterial streets.
two lane: up to 10,000 vehicles per day
four lane (undivided): up to 20,000 vehicles per day
four lane (divided): up to 30,000 vehicles per day
six lane (divided): up to 45,000 vehicles per day
In the downtown area with short blocks, lots of turning movements and STOP signs (or signals)
at every block, level of service C is much lower. Our consultants has used:
two lane: up to 6,000 vehicles per day
four lane (undivided): up to 12,000 vehicles per day
Obviously, Walnut Avenue between Main Street and 6th Street will not require a four lane
arterial.
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS OUTSIDE THE CORE AREA
The Planning Commission asked for traffic projections on Walnut Avenue west of 6th Street and
on Walnut Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. The April, 1989 Greer Up-Date
Study projected traffic volumes of 1,800 vehicles per day for Walnut Avenue west of 6th Street
and 5,950 vehicles per day for Walnut Avenue just east of Lake Street. Traffic volumes on
Walnut Avenue near Huntington Street and on Walnut Avenue near Beach Boulevard were taken
from the Waterfront EIR and are estimated at up to 15,000 vehicles per day. Walnut Avenue in
this reach will operate as a four lane (divided) arterial with a level of service C capacity of up
to 30,000 vehicles per day.
-2-
PEAK HOUR VS ADT
t�
Attached are copies of the May, 1988 and April 1989, Greer Up—Date Traffic Studies. The
traffic volumes in these studies are all expressed in terms of the P.M. peak hour. To
covert "P.M. Peak Hour" to "Average Daily Traffic" simply multiply by 10.
The proposed striping plan for Walnut Avenue is attached. Left turn lanes are provided at
all intersections and for most major access points to adjacent developments. No parking
is proposed for Walnut Avenue.
2212g
—3—
n > -, ro n
z > 3
SEV F.NTH
O O
63S0 SIXTH 95S0 3950 4pp� h
0 0
FIFTH 1000
..a
4
co w Q o y
6200 E-1 �g00
y�
MAIN -
1
o ut
0 0 ,f
2l00
THIRD ��b
n
O F
G� SECOND goo
0
° do
0
7/00 LAKE !0 3o O c
O �p
�O
REVISIONS REFEAENCES PREPARED my: DATE-
NO. GATE INIT. APP'Vb PRO TEC-TCb 2cio
FICK NO.
7-RA FFic VO t VM JE�s
DRAWN
. 0
vP H O
APPROVED DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. SHT--OF—
' Co'
I � _
i t
N
-- - -I I LL--
i
I`I
I
I
y
I .
a ram• ( I
A� Lome R/
I
1 y 7)Thru Ti-af{c l%.
a'
I'
.... .............
I ;
lI
ZA S T. ZZ_'r T
2323 W. Lincoln Ave., Suite 127
Anaheim, CA 92801
a (714) 520-5255
FAX (714) 520-5246
ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
April 4, 1989
Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: Downtown Specific Plan -- Traffic Analyses for Proposed Density
Reductions in the Downtown Core Area (39-o5).
Dear Mr. Evans:
As authorized, we have cotrpleted a revision to our downtown traffic
analysis submitted May 12, 1988, for the Huntington Beach Downtown
Specific Plan, specifically the core area of downtown. This analysis
proposes further density reductions in the downtown area. These proposals
are reflected in Table 1 as presented to us by the Planning Department
staff. The reductions occur in six of the eleven zones in the downtown
area.
The net effect of these reductions would.be a corresponding reduction in
trip generation. The daily trips would be reduced by 8,095, or
approximately 12.5 percent. Peak hour trip generation would be reduced by
a total of 859 trips (448 inbound and 411 outbound) , approximately 13.3
percent.
Similarly to the previous analysis, the trip reductions were assigned to
the core area street system based on the same general distribution for
each effected zone as follows:
north 40 percent
east 25 percent
west (PCH) 15 percent
east (PCH) 20 percent
Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
Downtown Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 2
TABLE 1
PROPOSED DENSITY CM4GE'S IN THE DOWNDOWN CORE
Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan
Daily P.M. Peak Hour
Zone PxxxK)sed Change Volumes In Out
ZONE 3
+ 15,000 sf office +72 +5 +28
- 160 du residential -976 -64 -32
-904 -59 - 4
ZONE 4
- 126 du residential -769 -50 -25
ZONE 5
- 130,000 sf vial -4,209 -185 -192
- 20,000 sf office -96 -7 -37
- 110 du residential -671 -44 -22
-4,976 -236 -251
ZONE 6
- 40,000 sf office -192 -14 -74
+ 63,000 sf camnercial +2,040 +89 +93
- 228 du residential -1,391 -91 -46
+457 -16 -27
ZONE 9
- 65,000 sf commercial -2,105 -92 -96
+ 200 hotel rowans +1,740 +72 +62
-365 -20 -34
ZONE 10
- 47,500 sf cc mnercial .-1,538 -67 -70
TOTAL -8,095 -448 -411
Source: Huntington Beach Planning Department; Greer & Co., Engineers
and Planners.
Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
Downtown Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 3
TABLE 2
PROPOSED USES - YEAR 2010
Huntington Beach Specific Plan
Duly P.M. Volumes
Zone Proposed Uses Volumes In Out-
1 60,000 sf comercial, 1,943 85 89
2 600 du residential 3,660 24 12
3*
Main Pier 35,000 sf commercial 1,133 50 52
Phase 2 (35,000 sf existing coimmercial) 1,133 50 52
30,000 sf ccammercial 144 11 56
200 du residential 1,220 80 40
Main Pier 1,750 seat theaters 233 233
Phase 1 15,925 sf office 76 6 30
23,575 sf ccmriercial 770 34 44
13,500 sf restaurant 1,011 51 32
31000 sf nightclub —(24,000 sf existing c omnercial) 770 34 44
130 du residential 793 52 26
4 100 du residential 610 40 20
5
150,000 sf ccnmvercial 4,857 213 222
20,000 sf office 96 7 37
60 du residential 366 24 12
6
80,000 sf ccmTe=ial . 2,590 114 118
10,000 sf institutional ----
275 du residential 1,678 110 55
Continued. . ..
Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer �.
Downtown Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 4
TABLE 2
PROPOSED USES - YEAR 2010
Huntington Beach Specific Plan
Daily P.M. Volumes
Zone Prono_sed Uses Volumes In Out
7
50,000 sf ccmnnercial 1,619 71 74
150,000 sf office 720 52 279
400 moan hotel 3,480 144 124
8 1,800 du residential 10,980 720 360
9
75,000 sf ccm¢nercial 2,429 107 111
1,400 roam hotel 12,180 504 434
10 40,000 sf commercial 1,295 57 59
11
7,000 sf ccumvsarcial 227 10 10
106 du residential 647 42 21
'DOTAL 56,427 2,925 2,646
d'
Mr• ' es Evans
City Engineer
DC1A*.cwn Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 5
The resulting development uses proposed in the plan with these reductions
are shown in Table 2 along with the projected trip generation for the plan
area by use and zone.
The trip reductions for each zone were assigned to the core area street
system. Using the 2010 p.m. peak hour projections in the May 12, 1988,
analysis, these trip reductions were deducted from those volumes to arrive
at 2010 projections with these latest density reduction proposals. The
2010 p.m. peak hour volumes for the core area under the existing plan are
shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 illustrates the 2010 projected traffic
volumes with the proposed density reductions.
In general, the traffic volume reductions are nominal, ranging from no
' change on some streets to as much as 125 vehicles per hour (two-
directions) on Atlanta Avenue and 150 vehicles per hour (two-directions)
on Main Street. Volume reductions of 30 to 50 vehicles per hour in each
direction occurred or. Orange Avenue, and 20 to 30 vehicles per hour in
each direction on Walnut Avenue, 30 to 40 vehicles on Lake Street, and 20
to 35 vehicles on Sixth Street. These volume changes are nominal and
won't significantly effect traffic operations on any of the streets as
presently planned.
As detailed in the May 12, 1988, letter report,. the downtown street
concept provides an arterial loop system to serve the village concept
within the core. The arterials consisting of Orange/Atlanta, Sixth
Street, Lake Street and Walnut Avenue provide access to village parking,
and provide primary routes through the downtown, yet around the village
core. The loop system would serve as feeder streets to the village and
carry through traffic to the beach and pierside developments. The local
streets internal to the core area would provide direct access to village
commercial and residential uses; and would allow for local on-street
parking.
There has been some discussion about reducing the width on Walnut Avenue
to require only two lanes instead of the recommended four lane
cross-section. The nominal reduction in traffic volumes that would result
from the proposed density reductions does not materially d'Lange the order
of magnitude of the traffic projections. The lane requirements will
• i
1
1
i M It
�:• r is�� — !�
J 4,ff� o d
�1 le,
,".r,+c;r;r r- ._. J emu: e,�' _ r��/fir✓/,x r __ �_.
2010 P.M. PEAK HOUR FIGURE
a 1
TRAFFIC- VOLUMES
(NLINS(RS A PLANN(AS EXISTING PLAN
s
. I
r.
M
;
ul
S
2010 P.M. PEAK HOUR FIGURE
�-� TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2 ,
WITH PROPOSED DENSITY REDUCTIONS
W. Les Evans
City Engineer '
Downtown Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 8
remain unchanged on the basis of the traffic volumes under either the
existing plan or the proposed density reduction. It is also important to
the entire concept of the loop system around the village core area to
maintain the integrity of the four-lane arterial loop.
The configuration for Walnut Avenue is to provide four travel lanes with a
median for left turn lanes and no on-street parking. The left turn lanes
are needed to access the local side streets into the village center, and
to access, major development sites. Walnut Avenue will provide one of the
major access facilities to the City's parking structure as well as to the
entertainment area. Left turn access to these facilities should be
provided as well as to the local circulation streets within the village.
The cross-section requirements for the four travel lanes and median would
be a 60-foot wide roadway within a 76 to 80-foot right of way. A 76-foot
right of way would only allow for 8-foot parkways/sidewalks on each side,
while the 80-foot right of way would permit the typical standard of
l0-foot parkways/sidewalks. The standard street width would require the
80-foot right of way for Walnut.
Based on the concept of the village center accept system and the street
geometries as recamPended in our May 12, 1988, letter report, both the
loop concept and the access system are still. valid and critical to the
maintenance of village concept. The currently proposed density reductions
do not alter the order of magnitude of traffic volumes projected for the
plan area, and therefore, do not result in any recanTended changes in the
street system or the lane configurations. In addition to the importance
of maintaining the four-lane roadways, the left turn medians are important
to provide left turn access internally to the village and to the
particular sites, including the city's parking structure and the
entertainment center.
As suggested in the May 12 report, it is important to prepare an overall
improvement concept plan showing detailed striping, intersection control;
on-street parking details, and overall traffic operations within the
context of which each development proposal or other activity could be then
be considered as they may come forward. These plans would provide for the
Mr. Les Evans
City Engineer
Downtown Traffic Update
April 4, 1989 - Page 9
assurance that development can proceed in a consistent and orderly manner
without violating the village concept plan nor its associated circulation
system.
Once again, we appreciate this opportunity to have been of assistance to
the City of Huntington Beach in ivplementing the Downtown Specific Plan.
If there are any questions or comments, please contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
QRpUSSlpjy�
& ao. �4`�°F.�GE/ 6- ell,
CO 4W
No. 766 1 +1
Larry E. Greer, P.E. J' TRAM\Z�'
Prlr_cipal l9lF Cf C�UF����
LDG:st
• I
J
OW
APO
ie
d
s'S . 7
1 �
I
t
3 �
�d1vi�.�D
REOUIRED RIGHT OF WAY FIGURE
a AND ROADWAY WIDENING 5
r
721 South Magnolia Avenue
Anaheim, California 92804
Oi (714)952-2886
7FAX No. (714)952-3175
ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
May 12, 1988
Mr. Les Swans
City Engineer
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Hungtington Beach, CA 92648
RE: Downtown Specific Plan — Traffic Analysis Up-date for the Core Area
Dear Mr. Evans:
As authorized, we have completed an up--date of our earlier traffic analyses
for the Downtown Specific Plan. This analysis reflect`, a change in the .
Downtown uses to a less intense village center. Significant reductions in
rcial and hotel uses and increases in residential uses have been
proposed. The proposed uses are listed in Table 1 for each of the zones
illustrated in Figure 1. Projected daily and p.m. peak hour trip
generation for each zone with buildout assumed for the year 2010 is .also
presented in Table 1. The trip generation rates utilized for each use is
presented in Table 2 and represents the most recent trip generation rates
available from the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
The projected trips for the Specific Plan area were assigned to the area
street system using the following general distribution:
north 40 percent
east 25 percent
west (PCH) 15 percent
east (PCH) 20 percent
The existing p.m. peak hour trips on the downtown core area street system
are shown in Figure 2. The 2010 projected p.m. peak hour trips for the
downtown core area street system are illustrated in Figure 3.
t• ` r
�-----� I r
w,��r -=-----�
1
RECOMMENDED FIGURE
a ROADWAY/RIGHT OF WAY 4
INGINg ERSA/LANN[Rf
.f
Mr. Les Evans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, 1988 - Page 2
TABLE 1
PROPOSED USES - YEAR 2010
Huntington Beach Specific Plan
Daily P.M. Volumes
Zone Proposed Uses Volumes In out
1 60,000 sq.ft. cam nercial 1,943 85 89
2 600 d.u. residential 3,660 24 12
3*
Main Pier 35,000 sq.ft. commercial 1,133 50 52
Phase 2 (35,000 sq.ft. existing commercial) (1,133) (50) (52)
15,000 sq.ft. office 72 5 28
250 d.u. residential 1,525 100 50
Main Pier 1,750 seat theaters --- 233 233
Phase 1 15,925 sq.ft. office .76 6 30
23,575 sq.ft. cammercial 770 34 44
13,500 sq.ft. restaurant 1,011 51 32
3,000 sq.ft. nightclub — --- --
(24,000 sq.ft. existing co mnercial) (770) (34) (44)
180 d.u. residential 1,098 72 36
60 d.u. residential 366 24 12
4 226 d.u. residential 1,378 90 45
5 280,000 sq.ft. camercial 9,066 398 414
40,000 sq.ft. office 192 14 74
170 d.u. residential 1,037 68 34
6 17,000 sq.ft. cxmmercial 550 24 25
40,000 sq.ft. office (192) (14) (74)
10,000 sq.ft. institutional — — ---
503 d.u. residential 3,068 201 100
(continued)
Mr. Les Evans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, . 1988 - Page 3
TABLE 1
PROPOSED USES - YEAR 2010
Huntington Beach Specific Plan
Daily P.M. Volumes
Zone Proposed Uses Volumes In Out
7 50,000 sq.ft. cxnmercial 1,619 71 74
150,000 sq.ft. office 720 52 279
400 room hotel 3,480 144 124
8. 1,800 d.u. residential 10,980 720 360
9 140,000 sq.ft. ca=iercial 4,533 199 207
1,200 room hotel 10,440 432 372
10 87,500 sq.ft. commercial 2,833 124 129
11 7,000 sq.ft. ccmnnercial 227 10 10 .
106 d.u. residential 647 42 21
TC!M 67,978 3,439 3,125
LEGEND
1-Visitor-serving commercial with residential
2-Residential
3-Visitor-serving commercial
4 -Residential with office (10% incidential commercial)
S-Commercial with office and residential
6-General commercial/residential/office
7-Visitor-serving commercial
8-Residential
9-Commercial/recreation
10-Pier commercial
I1-Beach open space
IUuL nEL �
o
❑ ❑❑❑❑ 0000000000
Ba
6
WJ cm
9
► c.K Ca. N
1 2 ❑❑ 4 3 7 lia
• C t I 1 C O C E • M
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIh ,
Specific Plan Zoning Districts
PLANNING DIVISION ' c
FIGURE 1
Mt. Los E.Vans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, 1988 - Page 5
TAHIE 2
TRIP GENERATION RATES
Huntington Beach Soecific Plan
P.M. Rates
Use Daily Rates In Out
C mmnercial 32.38 1.42 1.48
(per 1,000 sq.ft.)
Hotel 8.70 0.36 0.31
(Per room)
Residential 6.1 0.4 0.2
(Per d.u.)
t
Office 4.8 0.35 1.86
(per 1,000 sq.ft.)
Restaurant 74.9 3.80 2.34
(per 1,000 sq.ft.)
Source: "Trip Generation, An Informational Report", Fourth Edition,
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. , 1987;
Greer & Co. , Engineers and Planners.
I
t I i
1 I i
i4126
EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR FIGURE
a TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2
(NGIN[l Ali/LANNgAl
1
J/
1 "
D/Z•9NL�
t
;Ji¢G'/LPG `"...`._ G-,�c-w� ._. __ •'4�/�'`�lf/�s ! �..
grid
i
2010 P.M. PEAK HOUR FIGURE
a TRAFFIC VOLUMES
ENGINEERS PLANNERS
Mr. Les Evans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, 1988 - Page 8
The downtown street concept would provide an arterial loop system to serve
the village concept within the core. The arterials. consisting of
Orange/Atlanta, Sixth Street, Lake Street and Walnut Avenue would provide
access to village parking, and provide primary routes through the downtown,
yet around the village core. The loop system would serve as feeder streets
to the village and carry through traffic to the beach and piersi:de
developments. The local streets internal to the core area would provide
direct access to village commercial and residential uses, and would allow
for local on-street parking.
The projected traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the future street
requirements within the core area. The loop system would consist of Orange
Avenue between Sixth Street and Lake Street, lake Street between
Orange/Atlanta and PCH, Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and Lake Street,
and Sixth Street . between PCH and Orange Avenue. Orange Avenue and Walnut
Avenue connect arterial streets to the east -- orange connects to Atlanta,
and Walnut will be extended east of Lake Street as a four-lane arterial.
Lake Street north of Orange Avenue will be realigned to connect to Orange
at Third Street, and Sixth Street north of Orange will be realigned to
connect to Main Street at Frankfort.
The loop system of Orange, Lake, Walnut and Sixth will be widened to
provide four lanes with left turn lanes and medians and with no on-street
parking. Walnut Avenue should be widened to the proposed 60-foot roadway
in an 80-foot right of way, but projected traffic volumes may not require
four operational travel lanes for its entire length. For operational
needs, four lanes should be provided with no on-street parking on Walnut
between Main Street and Lake Street: This section of Walnut provides
direct access to the proposed entertainment center project and to the
City's proposed parking structure. Between Sixth Street and Main Street,
it may be possible to configure Walnut with two lanes, left .turn lanes and
a median, and permit on-street parking on both sides until such time as the
four travel lanes may be required. At that time, the on-street parking
could be removed to provide the four travel lanes. There is some hesitancy
in suggesting the two lane section on Walnut between Sixth and Main
although it would operate acceptably under projected traffic volumes. In
order to emphasize the loop arterial system and to provide its continuity
and clear designation to the driver, it would be appropriate to improve
Mr. Les Evans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, 1988 - Page 9
Walnut as four lanes from Sixth to Lake right from the start. The
difficulty of subsequently removing the on-street parking after it is once
installed in order to ultimately ' provide the four travel lanes would be
avoided if improved as four lanes initially.
The reccmnended roadway improvements are consistent with the prcposed
right-of-way and roadway cross-sections as presented by City staff.
The recmnended improvements for each roadway are illustrated in Figures 4
and.5, and are described below:
Sixth Street — PCH to Orange
4 lanes, no parking; 80' ROW/60' roadway
Sixth Street — Orange to Main
2 lanes, on-street parking; 77.5' ROW/55.5' roadway
Main Street -- Sixth to PCH
2 lanes, angled on-street parking; 75' RAW/50' roadway
Lake Street — PCH to Orange
4 lanes, bike lanes, no parking; 95' ROW/79' roadway
Lake Street — orange to Frankfort
4 lanes, bike lanes, no parking; 90' ROW/74' roadway
Lake Street -- north of Frankfort
2 lanes, bike lanes, on-street parking; 90' ROW/60' roadway
Orange Avenue — Sixth to Third
4 lanes, no parking; 80' ROW/60' roadway
Orange Avenue — Third to Lake
4 lanes w/right turn lane, no parking; 90' ROW/74' roadway
Walnut Avenue -- Sixth to Lake
4 lanes, no parking; 80' ROW/60' roadway
Mr. Les Evans
City of Huntington Beach
Downtown Traffic Analysis Up-date
May 12, 1988 - Page 12
In addition to these roadway improvements, traffic signals will be required
at Orange/Atlanta/Lake, Orange/Sixth, and 'Sixth/Main. Initially, .4-way
stop control will be required at Orange/Main and Orange/Lake/' iisd. Either
of both of these intersections may require signalization in the future. A
4-way stop control should also be provided at Main/Walnut. In order for
the loop arterial concept to operate effectively, all other-stop signs
should be removed fran Orange, Lake, Walnut, Sixth and Main with
cross-streets being stop sign controlled. A detailed striping plan,
intersection control plan, on-street parking details, and an overall core
area traffic operations plan should be prepared to program improvements in
a consistent and orderly manner.
a
We appreciate this opportunity to have been of assistance to the City of
Huntington Beach in implementing the Downtown Specific Plan. If there are
any questions or comrents, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely, QRpFESSIpNq
GENF
GREERR & 00.
No. 766 a'
Laity E. Greer, P.E. �fglE AFF�
Principal. OF CAS
LEG:st
•
TIP CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
:( INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUN11NCTON RIACH
Laura Phillips iron Keith H . Bohr
Associate Plannci Redevelopment: Analyst
PRECLSE PLAN OF' STREET October. 11 , 1.989
ALIGNMENT NO. 89 -3 Date
At the Planning Commission meeting of October 3 , 1989 , Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No . 89-3 was presented allowing for a 60 foot
right-of-way between Main Street and Sixth Street along Walnut
Avenue. This item was continued to the October 17, 1989 Planning
Commission meeting for the purposes of receiving more written
analysis of what was presented by staff and public during the public
hearing .
To that point , I have outlined below the amount of financial
assistance the City Council/Redevelopment Agency has committed, to
(late, to provide for the rehabilitation of properties that presently
exist within the 80 foot right-of-way.
205 - Fifth Street (corner of Fifth and Walnut) The Shank House
$150. 000 .
On January 30, 1989 , the City Council gave direction to have this
structure rehabilitated to the Secretary of Interiors Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic
Buildings . To date the foundation work has been completed at the
cost of approximately $50, 000 and the bid for the completion of the
rest of the improvements (i .e. electrical , plumbing, facade) has
been awarded for approximately $100, 000 .
128 -- Sixth Street (Sixth Street and Walnut Avenue) The Worthy
Properties $96,000 .
At the direction of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency, staff has
proceeded to negotiate with the Worthy' s for their properties to not
be included in the condominium portion of the Phase II development,
but to be rehabilitated so as to reflect their historic origins .
Staff is presently negotiating an Owner Participation Agreement with
the property owners .
Memo Laura Phillips
October 11, 1989
Page 2
312 WaInut: Avenue Mazot.ti ' ;; Rostaurant. $62, 000 .
'Phis historically significant structure was the City' s original
court-. house . Presently, the owner and tenant are in the final
stages of design work for the rehabilitation of the facade and the
expansion of the second floor to provide an additional dining area .
As you can see in an effort to retain some of the most historically
significant structures in the downtown area the City/Agency has
committed to invest well over $300 , 000 to rehabilitate properties
that now exist within the 60 foot right-of-way. This will virtually
preclude the dedication of such right-of-way for many years .
KB13 : kj 1
t = - GO
401
A/b/
6 ///Qi^ Sf
ON
19
' `� ,wry �' ��� I � i '• �� � I i ! I I i I � v
I
INTO FOOT �: %' - - -_- :�•� -
i
Kuntington beach department-of community development
STA f F
EPOR
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Community Development
DATE: October 3 , 1989
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3/ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 89-36
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: Reduction of ultimate right-of-way width for Walnut
Avenue, from 80 feet to 60 feet
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue between Main and Sixth Streets
1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No . 89-36 and Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3
and recommend adoption by the City Council .
2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
The City Council adopted Circulation Element Amendment No. 84-1 on
June 4 , 1984 , establishing the general alignment of Walnut Avenue
between Lake and Sixth Streets . Precise Plan of Street Alignment
No. 86-1, establishing the precise alignment of Walnut Avenue, was
adopted October 27, 1986 . This precise alignment reflects 80 foot
ultimate right-of-way requiring a 10 foot dedication on each side of
Walnut Avenue, to be required at the time adjacent properties are
redeveloped. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-3 proposes to
create a modified right-of-way width of 60 feet on Walnut Avenue
from Main to Sixth Street.
3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,
the Department posted draft Negative Declaration No . 89-36 for ten
days, and no comments either verbal or written were received. The
staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a
negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No. 89-3 , it is necessary for the Planning
Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 89-36 .
A-F M-23C
A
4 . 0 COASTAL STATUS:
Walnut Avenue is within the coastal zone; however, a precise plan of
street alignment is not a project as defined by 5. 989 . 5 . 1 of the
Ordinance Code and is not subject to a coastal development permit .
5 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS:
Walnut Avenue is within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area .
6 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN:
Walnut Avenue is within the Downtown Specific Plan area .
7 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable.
8 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Walnut Avenue between Lake and Sixth Streets is presently precise
planned as a secondary arterial (80 feet) . This alignment requires
10 feet of additional right-of-way on each side of the existing 60
foot wide street and features two travel lanes in each direction
with no parking, a 12 foot unraised median with left-turn pockets,
and 10 foot parkways .
Staff proposes that Walnut Avenue between Main Street and Sixth
Street be designed as a modified width secondary arterial, with a 60
foot right-of-way. The Public Works Traffic Section has suggested
three alternative cross-section designs which may accommodate
traffic flow within 60 feet (Figure 1) . Initially, Walnut Avenue
would be designed with a 10 foot striped center lane for left turn
movements, two 17 foot travel lanes and 8 foot sidewalks . This
would be the primary section design. If necessary, two alternative
striping designs could be installed at a later date. The first
alternative would feature two 10 foot and two 12 foot travel lanes
with 8 foot sidewalks . This design would increase traffic flow, but
somewhat hinder left turn movements . An ultimate striping plan
which would feature two lanes in one direction, one lane in the
other direction, and an off-center left turn pocket may be
implemented after the downtown is redeveloped and the predominant
direction of traffic flow is determined.
The City Council, on September 18, 1989, approved the Main Pier
Phase II Development Concept for the blocks bounded by Main Street,
Pacific Coast Highway, Sixth Street and Walnut Avenue. The
development concept depicts a 60 foot right-of-way for Walnut Avenue
between Main Street and Sixth Street . The Council directed
Redevelopment staff to proceed with negotiations with
owners/developers based on this concept .
On December 12, 1988 the City Council approved in concept a
demonstration project including facade rehabilitation and new
construction in the block bounded by Walnut Avenue, Main Street,
Olive Avenue and Fifth Street . This project is currently before the
Staff Report - 10/3/89 -2- (3721d)
Planning Commission as Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 and Coastal
Development Permit No. 89-1 . It was continued from the September
19 , 1989 Planning Commission meeting to the October 3, 1989 meeting
in order to allow for discussion and action on the Walnut Avenue
Precise Plan which will precede any action on the entitlment . The
existing structures are built to the 60 foot right-of-way line (zero
setback) . Should the Planning Commission deny Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 89-3 , an additional 10 feet of dedication would
be required for lots adjacent to Walnut Avenue of the time of new
construction.
If the Walnut right-of-way remains at 80 feet along the
rehabilitation block, it is likely that property owners facing
Walnut will consider minor facade rehabilitation of existing
buildings only, since any substantial reconstruction or
rehabilitation would trigger additional right-of-way dedication and
render the twenty-five (25) foot wide lots unbuildable.
9 . 0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No . 89-36, adopt Resolution No. 1421 approving Precise
Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 , and recommend adoption by the
City Council .
10 . 0 ALTERNATE ACTION:
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Street Sections
2 . Area Map
3 . Resolution
HS:LP: jr
Staff Report - 10/3/89 -3-- (3721d)
eo '
INITIAL
s S' 10' 71 8' STRIPING
IT I ' SECTION
ALTERNATIVE
12 i 10' - 10' 12' � i
I
I SECTION
i ALTERNATIVE
8 12, 10' iO� 8' 2
12'
SECTION
ALTERNATIVE
SW sw 2
ELAN VIEW
� e
� b
}
n rco -� L-_ � IJIJ I LJL�J � •%/
�I
' �/
PAL NAkT4 ORD I � AVE. N
FID1. J
UNEVA /
<Lf f z 4rn 4
oL
� rl
> I
VP a FRANKFORT E�--
a 6 OLDT N �+
SPECIR A -
2� E_ (DISTRI E
f EIMIRA = JlrE
�f h rry rtit F ��l "PECAN
ziM H-FP2
CF9 '1' ,ry2�r J z DETROIT AVE.
PIE
I Y CF l
oa+ro
HICAGO�F�AVE
1C J px.pp.Q R2-PD-CZ-FP2 Au w
2 !�
> 5 R2-PD-CZ
'Yp0 00 2 p 9AE AVE N r 4��
Q U �t�II _
c/i drys `� y •F hA U (j.:8 3 _� ;AN -
(' & -PD-C2-FP2 DFY1x ___ ff9� �• -
s�`C/A` r0 'P/ / e v ��. C�V �i�,R2•PD-fZ-FP2 !�i R2
._.
�-PD-CZ-F?2
p2 y =xoo V r w[ar12 yA:4 R2-PD-CZ-FP2.
DOWNTOWV S EUFIC PLNo
ACy ( DIMT ICT#8aJ !' Qom( a 3 •'1Orz+�a n'#�a' R2-PD-CZ-FP2 m
�4 Jn �� \� w�'t�Kr • riirxq""-
(qN 'Y I ��{� oo R2 PD CZ fP2 o R2-PD-CZ"P2
/9C
Go !y ST C/ vo44
=.> /S ok CT 75
R2-PD-CZ-FP2"i R2 PD CZ_F,2
MH-CZ FP2 -EP=•`':t� catr•-�t�E�--"R2-PD-CZ-FP2 6quS°f�a
- o —I000 FA3/C A FAST- I i
SCALE -- - IN FEET ,`'• \ n -G DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN-15-x I -
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIC,NMENT Np. 8-9"-3 J:
Hu"NUON BEACH - -
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
RESOLUTION NO. 1421
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-3 ALIGNING WALNUT AVENUE BETWEEN
MAIN STREET AND SIXTH STREET
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Government Code, the
Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice
duly given, held a public hearing to consider Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No . 89-3; and
The Planning Commission finds that said Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 89-3 is reasonably necessary to the orderly and
efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and
safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly
development of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of
Huntington Beach does resolve as follows :
SECTION 1. District Map 12 (Sectional District map
11-6-11) marked Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference is hereby amended to include Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No . 89-3 , to effect the precise alignment of Walnut Avenue
between Main Street and Sixth Street;
SECTION 2 . The real property designated as Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 89-3 is more particularly described in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 3 . To approve Resolution No. 1421 and recommend
adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
California. t
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day
of October, 1989 , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Mike Adams, Secretary Ken Bourguignon, Chairman
(3734d)
_�-. •: Mailed 11/13 811 (7) City Councilpersons and ) City Planning Commissioners
11�1 l\
RECEIVED
13 November 1989 NOV 1 5 1989
REDEVELOPMENT DEPT.
The Honorable Wes Bannister
Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Re: Main/Pier: Phase II
Huntington Beach, California
Street Dedications
Dear Mayor Bannister:
As the City Council and the Planning Commission deliberate and
address the potential widths of Fifth and Walnut Streets (and
related impacts) , it would seem both timely and appropriate that
we share our perspectives and analyses.
For your reference, the attached analyses represent our
assessment of the Main/Pier Phase II project impact(s) should the
Council and Planning Commission elect to a) maintain the 80'
width on Fifth Street (vs. the 60' as proposed) , and b) widen
Walnut Street to an 80' width (vs. the 60' as proposed) . The
Walnut widening can be mitigated on Block II by the granting of a
setback variance. However, on Block I, there is no way to
mitigate the impact on the Terry/Lane property.
Unfortunately, there is no way to mitigate the Fifth Street (801 )
impact on the project. Should Council/Commission elect to
ultimately pursue this issue, it would have severe economic and
planning impacts on both Blocks I and II.
As such, we must respectfully state our stringent opposition to
these two possible street reconfigurations as they differ from
the current plan(s) .
GRIFFIVRELATED PROPERTIES
Mayor Wes Bannister
13 November 1989
Page Two
In advance, thank you for the opportunity to share our views on
this critical issue.
Most cordially,
GRIFFIN/RELATED PROPERTIES
•
Ro MeN.&Torrierio
Principal
RNT/keDll-13a
Attachments
bxc (all without attachments): Paul Cook
Mike Adams
Marilyn Whisenand
Ralph Spargo
Frank Caput, Esq.
RCV B'(:.-ERG:'. TELECOPI ER 70-10#-20-89 9:0?7,,M 71-) 714754194S;# 2
'89 10i20 09 a 714 549 --97 MCLARANG UPSQUEZ 02
MAIN PIER, PHASE II
(PROJECT IMPACT SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY)
October 19, 1989
A) FIFTH STREET DEDICATION
BLOCK ONE - COMMERCIAL
k' Owner) - 2-1/2 - 1 let Ind 3rd
Area Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Subtotal
Cracchlolo -800 -800
Conference Center -500 -500
"Future Use" Complex -650 -650
Public"Spare =162 -400 -1,200 -1,000 -2,762
Total -162 1,200 -1",200 -2;150 -4,712
a Parking: -14 Stalls -14 Stalls -14 Stalls -14 Stalls -56 Stalls
'f
.Y
BLOCK TWO - RESIDENTIAL
Owner/ - i Street Plaza 2nd 3rd 4th
Area Level . Level Level Level Level Level Subtotal
t
Condominium
Units -2 -2 -2 -1 -7
Units
Parking: -10 Stalls -8 Stalls -18 Stalls
t
Main Pier, Phase II
Project impact Square Footage Summary
October 19, 1989 -- page 2
B) WALNUT AVENUE DEDICATION
BLOCK ONE - COMMERCIAL
Owner/ - 2-1/2 - 1 1st 2nd 3rd
Area Floor Floor Floor Floor Floor Subtotal
Terry -1,150 -1,150 -2,300
Total -1,150 -1,150 -2,300
BLOCK TWO - RESIDENTIAL
Owner/ - 1 Street Plata 2nd 3rd 4th
Area Level Level Level Level Level Level Subtotal
Condominium
.Units -2 -2 -2 -2 -8
Units
Parking: -2 Stalls -2 Stalls -4 Stalls
* The project Impact tabulation for Block Two will be eliminated per city's grant to the variance on
Walnut Avenue.
YL/ds
89-166/
89-148
Y)(A44UYr AVP, TM:-A MAI LjK6T
ACE,2J301/FM CTL 0004844 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 193
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL h10/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND AD SS CODE TRA NAZ
ESS CODE TRA NAME A11D ADDRESS CODE
024-143-11 CITY OF HU INGTON BEACH 024-143-25 CITY ON BEACH 024-144-12 CHILCUTT,--W-ILLIAM D
04-035 2000 MA ST 04-035 P 0 BO 04-035 %SCHWAgT2, RICHARD
HUNT TON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTI 92648 1303i0AKGROVE RD
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362
024-143-12 KOLZNGTON
S E 024-144-01 PARNA YAN, JOHN I TR 024-144-13 MC CA LL-EN, MARCUS M
04-035 160TINE LN 04-035 205 AKE ST 04-035 /.S�, VIRGINIA
HUt�, EACH, CA 92647 H TINGTON BEACH, CA 92648dld COSTA BELLA
i
EL TO 0, CA 92630
024-143-17 KOLLER JAMES E 024-144-02 HICKS, RETTJM 024-144-14 STUPIN, A-NDREW '
04-035 1600 BALLANTINE LN 04-035 P 0 B9-X 310 04-035 812 13?N ST
HU INGTON BEACH, GA 92647 HUN YINGTN BCH, CA 92648 H NTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-143-19 CITY HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-144-03 HICKS, VERETT M 024-145-08 RINALDI, ANGELO
04-035 200 MAIN ST 04-035 P D roNGTN X 310 04-035 P 0 BOX F
HU TINGTON BEACH,--CA 92648 HUNII BCH, CA_.. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-143-20 KOLL , JAMES EDWARD 024-144-04 UNI D STATES OF AMERICA 024-145-10 LARSON, DAVID P TR
04-035 160 BALLENTINE LNG 04-035 N ADDRESS O4-035 33 WINDCREST
TINGTOh1 BEACH, CA 92647 �k0 ADDRESS LAGUNA NIGUEL CA, CA 92677
024-143-23 CITY 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-144-10 PAP,NbyKIAN, VALQNTZNE 024-145-11 HEP,RELL, JOHN E
04-035 P 0 X 190 04-035 -TIVCHICAGO AVE 04-035 MR & MRS HERRELL
HUN INGTN BCH, CA / 92648 hIL�NTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 213 6TH ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
024-143-24 CITY OF H TINGTON BEACH 024-144-11 DUZLEON 024-145-12 CADE , MERLE E
04-035 P 0 BOX 90 04-035 0LN 04-035 17532 METZLER LN
HUNTI TN BCH, CA 92648 �t�UNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
AC62.J301/FM CTL 0004845 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 194
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-145-13 KING, JOAN S TR 024-145-22 WHALEY, THERESA A 024-145-29 KOTSCH, NATALIE A
04-035 536 S OLIVE WAY 04-001 19431 RANCH LN #105 04-001 220 7TH ST
DENVER, CO 80224 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-145-14 FEE JOHN W 024-145-23 MC ROBERTS, JOHN PRICE JR 024-145-31 MILLER, STELLA TR
� 04-035 19342 WOODLAND LN 04-001 206 7TH ST 04-001 2660 POINT DEL MAR AVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
024-145-16 HAGENE STEFFEN D 024-145-24 SALERNO, DANIEL JOSEPH 024-145-32 GALLONIO DENIS
_ 04-001 224 7TH ST 04-001 211 18TH ST 04-035 476 W NAOMI AVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 ARCADIA, CA 91006
024-145-18 OSTERMAN, JAMES E 024-145-25 PETERSON, JOHN W 024-145-33 RINALDI, ANGELO
04-001 520 MEADOWVIEW DR 04-001 840 WINDCREST DR 04-035 P 0 BOX F
LA.CANADA, CA 91011 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 HUNT=NGTON BEACH, CA 92648
•024-145-19 BARNES, WALTER J TR 024-145-26 GOURLEY, ROBERT D 024-146-01 BEAL, BARBARA D
04-001 202 7TH ST 04-001 2201 CIELO PL 04-035 2100 OLD QUARRY RD
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 ARCADIA, CA 91006 RIVERSIDE , CA 92506
024-145-20 VAN THIEL, JORDAN M 024-145-27 KOTSCH, NATALIE A 024-146-02 SCOTT, RUBY
04-001 210 CYPRESS O4-001 218 7TH ST 04-035 7821 TALBERT AVE
- BALBOA, CA 92661 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-145-21 STOCKER, FRANCIS W TR 024-145-28 MYHRA, DOUGLAS V 024-146-03 LITTLE, YVONNE EUGENIE AN
04-001 10241 CAMDEN CIR 047001 212 7TH ST 04-035 N
VILLA PARK, CA 92667 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 10062 MERRIMAC
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
AC6EJ301/FM CTL 0004846 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 195
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-146-05 WAMPLER, L CLYDE 024-146-14 LU, JAMES 024-147-10 SHANDRICK, SYLVIA S
04-035 9582 ONSET CIR 04-035 6071 MANORFIELD DR 04-035 6021 DOYLE DR
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
024-146-06 BRIGGS, JAMES M. 024-146-15 STUPIN, ANDREW 024-147-11 MULLIGAN, GARY
04-035 14312 WILLOW LN 04-035 3701 BIRCH ST #210 01+-035 TRAINER„ BEN
TUSTIN, CA 92680 NEWPORT BEACH CA, CA 92660 2364 THIRD ST
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107
024-146-07 STUPIN, ANDREW 024-147-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-147-14 LANGEVIN, DOUGLAS M S
04-035 3701 BIRCH ST #210 04-035 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 04-035 8196 PAWTUCKET DR
NEWPORT BEACH CA, CA 92660 2000 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-146-09 WOOD, BLANCHE A 024-147-03 BURRIS, DAVID 024-147-15 WURZL, THOMAS R
04-035 201 5TH ST 04-035 L20 5TH ST 04-035 158 ARGONNE AVE
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 LONG BEACH, CA 90803
024-146-10 WOOD, BLANCHE A 024-147-05 GALLEGOS, WILLIAM G 024-147-23 COOPER, PAULINE M
04-035 201 5TH ST 04-035 210 5TH ST 04-035 P 0 BOX 723
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-146-12 WAMPLER, L CLYDE 024-147-08 HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELO 024-147-25 HARLOW, RICHARD A
04-035 9582 ONSET CIR 04-035 PMENT AGENCY 04-035 111 10TH ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 2000 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON PEACH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-146-13 WAMPLER, L CLYDE 024-147-09 LINDBORG, LEONARD 0 024-147-26 CAVERLY, THOMAS A
04-035 9582 ONSET CIR 04-035 17220 NEWHOPE ST 04-035 553 TEMPLE HILLS DR
- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SUITE 127 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
AC6t•J301/FM CTL 0004847 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 196
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-147-27 CAVERLY, THOMAS A 024-147-34 TERRY, ELMYRA I 024-148-03 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 553 TEMPLE HILLS DR 04-035 TERRY, ROBERT C 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 122 STH ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648
024-147-28 DECKER, MARJORIE T TR 024-147-35 TAYLOR FAMILY TRUST 024-148-04 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 APT G-214 04-035 220 VIA SAN REMO 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
8877 LAUDERDALE CT NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
024-147-29 HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELO 024-147-36 ORANGE COAST SPECIALTIES 024-148-05 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY
04-035 PMENT AGENCY 04-035 PROJECT #;2 04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN ST %ROHM, JOHN H 2O00 MAIN ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 636 E CHAPMAN AVE P 0 BOX 190
ORANGE , CA 92666 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-147-30 GALLEGOS, WILLIAM G 024-147-37 HATCH, GARY 024-148-06 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 210 5TH ST 04-035 :BEACH COMBERS LOCKER 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 207 MAIN ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-147-31 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-147-38 FURMAN, CALVIN L 024-148-07 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 P 0 BOX 190 04-035 81 -730 HIGHWAY 111 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 INDIO, CA 92201 LOS ANGELES, CA_ 90065
024-147-32 TRAINER, BEN ADAM TR 024-148-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELO 024-148-08 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 2364 3RD ST 04-035 PMENT AGENCY 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 2000 MAIN ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-147-33 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF 024-148-02 KOURY, ROBERT J 024-148-09 KOURY, ROBERT J
04-035 THE CITY OF 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176 04-035 P 0 BOX 65176
2000 MAIN ST LOS ANGELES, CA 90065 LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
AC6ZJ301/FM CTL 0004848 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTPICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 197
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-148-10 KOURY, ROBERT J 024-148-20 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 024-151-03 VOLKER, HENRY C
04-035 P 0 BOX 65176 04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-001 MR & MRS H VOLKER
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065 2000 MAIN ST 18103 SANTA CECILIA ST
P 0 BOX 190 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-148-11 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 024-148-21 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 024-151-05 ASHOKA INVESTMENTS
04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-035 %Y R REALITY
2000 MAIN ST 2000 11AIN ST 129 6TH ST
P 0 BOX 190 P C BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-143-12 NICCOLE, DENNIS A 024-150-06 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-151-06 ASPEREN, ROBERT W
04-035 400 3RO ST 04-034 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 04-035 121 6TH ST
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-148-14 KOURY, ROBERT J 024-150-16 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT 024-151-07 BYRD, DAVID N
04-035 P 0 BOX 65176 04-034 OF GENERAL SERVICES O4-035 3610 VIOLET ST
L05 ANGELES, CA 90065 REAL ESTATE DIV SEAL BEACH, CA 90740
650 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
024-148-15 KOURY, ROBERT J 024-150-17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT 024-151-03 RHEE , CHOONG H
04-035 P 0 BOX 65176 04-035 OF GENERAL SERVICES O4-035 P 0 BOX 1041
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065 PEAL ESTATE DIV HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
650 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
024-148-16 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 024-151-01 SMITH, ROBERT L T 024-151-09 SCHOWALTER, MICHAEL L
04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-001 2015 E OCEAN BLVD 04-035 115 6TH ST
2000 MAIN ST BALBOA, CA 92661 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
P 0 BOX 190
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-148-19 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY 024-151-02 `:ING, DON E 024-151-10 PETERSEN, WAYNE
04-035 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-001 3036 MARNA AVE 04-035 195 CLAREMONT #339
2000 MAIN ST L014G BEACH, CA 90808 LONG BEACH, CA 90803
P 0 BOX 190
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
i
1
ACh2J301/FM CTL 0004849 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 198
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-151-20 KITABJIAN, JOHNNY TR 024-152-02 HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELO 024-152-12 WOOD, BLANCHE A
04-001 2435 BELLA VISTA 04-034 PMENT AGENCY 04-034 201 5TH ST
VISTA, CA 92083 2000 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-151-25 BOGOSIAN, JOHN TR 024-152-03 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORP 024-152-13 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
04-001 SUNUKJIAN, MARY 04-034 P 0 BOX 4049 04-034 P 0 PDX 190
2475 QUEENSBERRY RD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92605 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648
PASADENA, CA 91104
024-151-26 HOREMIAN, ARDEM 024-152-04 HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELO 024-153-01 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
04-001 2475 QUEENSBERRY RD 04-034 PMENT AGENCY 04-034 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PASADENA, CA 91104 2000 MAIN ST 2000 MAIN ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-151-27 YEN, JOHN CHIN-JIN 024-152-05 SHUPE , MARGARET E 024-153-02 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
04-035 18486 MT STEWART CIR 04-034 XSHUPE, ROBERT Q 04-034 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 333 CIVIC CENTER DR WEST 2000 MAIN ST
SANTA ANA, CA 92701 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-151-28 SAV-MOR OIL CO 024-152-06 DMOHUNDRO, STUART W TR 024-153-03 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
04-035 5150 WILSHIRE BLVD 04-034 8070 LANGDON AVE 9106 04-034 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SUITE 100 VAN NUYS, CA 91406 2000 MAIN ST
LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-151-29 SAV-MOR OIL CO 024-152-10 CRACCHIOLO, FRANK M TR 024-153-04 LANE, JAMES A
04-001 5150 WILSHIRE BLVD 04-034 19712 QUIET BAY LN 04-034 MR & MRS JAMES A LANE
SUITE 100 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 637 FRANKFORT
LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
024-152-01 WORTHY, SHIRLEY D 024-152-11 WOOD, BLANCHE A 024-153-05 MASE , ANN L
04-034 801 13TH ST 04-034 201 5TH ST 04-034 123 MAIN ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
AC6'2J301/FM CTL 0004850 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 199
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL HO/ OWNERS ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE
024-153-07 MULLIGAN, GARY V 024-153-15 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED 024-154-02 SARRABERE , CHARLES
04-034 211 MAIN ST 04-034 113 MAIN ST 04-034 WOOD, BLANCHE A
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 201 5TH ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-153-08 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD H 024-153-16 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF 024-154-03 TAYLOR, MARGIE J
04-034 %JACK SURF-N-SPORT 04-034 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 04-034 220 VIA SAS: REMO
113 MAIN ST 2000 MAIN ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-153-10 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 024-153-17 DRAPER, ELEANOR J 024-154-04 TAYLOR, MARGIE J
04-034 P 0 BOX 190 04-034 121 MAIN ST 04-034 220 VIA SAN REMO
HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
024-153-11 BAGSTAD, ELDON W 024-153-18 ALFONSO, FRANK 024-154-05 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO
04-034 901 CATALINA AVE 04-034 6630 VICKIVIEW DR 04-034 ASSOCIATES
SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 CANOGA PARK, CA 91307 305 WALNUT AVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-153-12 GOSNEY, JACK L 024-153-19 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED 024-154-06 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO
04-034 P 0 BOX 23 04-034 %JACKS SURFBOARDS O4-034 ASSOCIATES
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 113 MAIN ST 305 WALNUT AVE
` HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-153-13 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD 024-153-20 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED 024-154-07 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO
04-034 113 MAIN ST 04-034 %JACKS SURFBOARDS O4-034 ASSOCIATES
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 113 MAIN ST 305 WALNUT AVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-153-14 ABDELMUTI, AHMAD HAMED 024-154-01 ZEIDAN, ADEL MUSTAFA 024-154-08 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF H B
04-034 113 MAIN ST 04-034 10220 BLACK RIVER 04-034 301 WALNUT ST
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648
AQ62J301/FM CTL 0004851 06-20-89 9:24 PM 1989-90 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 200
DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS- ZIP
TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME ANDORESS CODE
024-154-09 CALIFORNIA RESORTS 024-159-02 HUNTING BEACH CO 024-161-06 HAAS, Y R
04-034 INTERNATIONAL 04-034 PROP Y TAX 04-035 302 D ST
222 5TH ST P BOX 7611 INGTON BEACH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 AN FRANCISCO, CC,-% 94120
i
024-154-10 CALIFORNIA RESORTS 024-159-03 HUNTIRS ON BEACH CO 024-161-07 DART, FL-TCHER H
04-034 INTERNATIONAL 04-034 PRqPfRTY TAX 04-035 310 2NO ST
222 5TH ST BOX 7611 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . 92648 / SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
024-154-11 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO 024-159-04 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 024-161-11 PARNAV N, D0ROTHY E
04-034 ASSOCIATES O4-034 PRO.PE'RTY TAX 04-035 320 'D ST
305 WALNUT AVE P� BOX 7611 H.V TINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
024-154-12 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO 024-159-06 HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 024-161-12 DEUNDI t, GEORGE
04-034 ASSOCIATES O47034 PROPERTY TAX DIV 04-035 317 D ST
305 WALNUT AVE 225-GUSH ST H� INGTN BCH, CA 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 S-AN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
024-154-13 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO 024-159-07 HUNTINGT-ON BEACH CO 024-161-14 PALL IAO N0, ALFRED J JP
04-034 ASSOCIATES O4-035 PROPERTY TAX DIV 04-035 10 HUNTINGTON DR
305 WALNUT AVE 225�-LUSH ST ARCADIA, CA 91006
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
024-154-14 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO 024-160-03 NICCOLE, MICHAEL W 024-161-15 ZIETHI G, JAMES F TR
04-034 ASSOCIATES O4-035 400�-3RD ST 04-035 1608 CRAIG LN
305 WALNUT AVE HNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
024-154-16 CALIFORNIA RESORTS/HASEKO 024-161-01 PALLAD"INO, RITA M 024-161-16 WESTA , GARRY RUSSELL
04-034 ASSOCIATES O4-035 400 S MARIPOSA APT 24 04-035 252.,4-1 HARTOG ST
305 WALNUT AVE L. S ANGELES, CA 900.20 L,"UNA HILLS, CA 92653
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Paul Cook, City Administrator From Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Subject Hearing on Appeal by Councilman Mays Date 11/18/89
of PPSA 89-3 Walnut Avenue
Attached is a legal notice given to this office to set the public hearing
on the above for the meeting of 12/4/89.
A couple of weeks ago you had stated that you wanted notification (APIs)
given on this hearing.
I have always had a notification - AP - 300 ft. list given on Precise Plans
in the past.
I have enclosed sections of the ordinance code which may be applicable.
If you have changed your mind about notification please tell me today as this
must be published and mailed shortly.
or is
I am asking the City Attorney to verify that mailing is/not needed on a
Precise Plan of Street Alignment so this will not come up again in the future.
cc: Gail Hutton, City Attorney
��., �-��._ ��c���.� a..�,. a-• �..._S c3 t.v ¢..�• ,� \ems_
a 'J r 'k
. cam.►\-
RESOLUTION NO . 5448
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO . 84 -1 TO CHANGE THE STREET WIDTHS
OF WASHINGTON AVENUE AND LYNDON STREET
WHEREAS , pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law , particularly
California Government Code section 65500 , the Planning Commission
of the City of Huntington Beach , after notice duly given , held a
public hearing on September 5 , 1984 to consider Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 84 -1 to alter the widths of Washington
Avenue and Lyndon Street ; and
On October 1 , 1984 , after notice duly given , hearing was held
before this Council , and the matter having been considered , the
Council finds that said Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 84-1
is reasonably necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of
traffic , for the preservation of the health and safety of the
inhabitants of the city , and for the orderly development of the
community ,
NOW , THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows :
That the real property hereinafter described and shown on the
map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto , incorporated herein and by
this reference made a part hereof , is hereby designated and
adopted as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 84-1 of the City
of Huntington Beach :
That portion of the southwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of
Section 23 , Township 5 South , Range 11 West ,
in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and the Rancho
Las Bolsas , City of Huntington Beach , County of
Orange , State of California , as shown on a map
ahb
9/12/84
0214L 1
ORDINANCE NO . 2827
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY
AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 15 TO INCLUDE PRECISE
PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 TO REALIGN
GOTHARD STREET SOUTH OF MCFADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law,
particularly California Government code sections 65453 et seq. ,
the Pl--nninc Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , after
notice duiv given , held a public hearing on December 17 , 1985 to
consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 to move that
portion of the existing centerline of Gothard Street , extending
six hundred ( 600 ) feet south of McFadden Avenue , approximately 2S70
feet ; anc
On v;arch 17 1qsF 1986 , after notice duly given ,
hearing was held before this Council , and the matter having been
cor:sidered , t':e Council finds that sai:: Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No . 25-2 is reasonably . necessary to the orderly and
efficient flow of traffic , for the preservation of the health and
safety of the ir:habitants of the city, and for the orderly
deve_.opme:,t of the community .
NOW, THEREFORE , the City Council of the City of Huntirgton
Beach does res.:lve as follows :
SECTION 1 . That the real property hereinafter describe: and
shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto, incorporated
herein and by this reference , is hereby designated and adopted as
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 of the City of
Huntington Beach :
9880--9883
Article 988
AP
Sections.*
9880 Appeal By Applicant or Interested Parties .
9881 Challenge By �City Council ..
9882 Report .
9883 Notice.
9884 Action of Appeal .
9885 Issuance of Permits or Entitlements Prohibited.
9880 - Aoveal By Applicant or Interested Part-ies. Appeal may
be made to the City .Council from any decision, determination or
requirements of the Planning Commission by filing notice
thereof in writing with the City Clerk within -ten (10) days
after .suc.h decision or determination or requirement is made. .
Such .notice shall set forth in �detail the action and grounds by
and upon which the applicant or interested party deem himself *
aggrieved. (972)
9881 Challenge By City Council. The City Council or any
member thereof may request in writing, within the ten (10) day
period for appeal, a hearing before -the City Council to
consider any decision or requirement of the Planning
Commission. Said appeal shall specify in detail the reasons
for the appeal and the hearing on appeal shall be limited to
such specified reasons : (1865-11/73)
9882 Report. The City Clerk shall report the filing of. such
notice to the Planning Commission and. a written report shall be
submitted to the City Council by the Planning Commission or
shall be represented a.t the hearing . The party whose decision,
determination or requirement by the Planning Commission is upon
appeal, may submit a written report to the city Council for
consideration. (9,72)
9883 Notice. The City Clerk shall give notice of any such
appeal to all property owners within 300 feet of any property
on which an appeal to the City Council has been filed. To
cover the expenses of such notice, a fee, set by resolution of
the City Council, shall be paid by the applicant. This notice ,
fee must be paid at the time notice of appeal is filed.
Nothing in . this section shall be construed to mean that a
filing fee is necessary if the appeal is made by a member of
the City Council . (2441-8/80)
11/87
9884--9885
9884 Action of Appeal. Said appeal shall be set for hearing
within thirty (30) days, or longer, if requested by appellant,
from the time the matter is received by the City Clerk,
together with the necessary fees.. Upon the hearing of said
appeal , the City Council may affirm, overrule or modify the
decision appealed . from the enter such order or orders as are in
harmony with the spirit and purpose of applicable provisions of
Division 9, with reasons stated. In cases of appeal of matters
relating to conditional exceptions, the Council shall , prior to
affirming the grant of or reversing the denial of a conditional
exception, make findings of fact. in support of and relevant to
the hardship standard. Disposition of appeals by the City
Council shall be final . (1230, 1656-7/71)
9885 Issuance of Permits or. Entitlements Prohibited. No
permit or entitlement shall be issued by any department of the
city which permit or entitlement is issued pursuant to any
administrative procedures or hearings for which an appeal
period is provided by this code, pending the expiration of such
appeal period or the final determination of any appeal filed
pursuant to this code. (1830-7/73)
. r
(,ggior Law: 972, 1227, 1230, 1656-7/71; 1830-7/73 , 2441-8/80
i
11/87
E' ty
9870--9871
Article 987 \ ,
C),
984 Public Hearing.
9070.1 Setting of Public Hearing.
98"10.2 Hearing By Commission Before Favorable
Recommendation.
9474.3 . (Repealed Ord. Nos. . 495, 556, 1782-11/72)
9R71 Notice of Hearings. Newspaper Publication.
9012 Additional Notice..
W2.1 Posting Notices: Time.
9§72.1.1 Distance Between .Botices.
9 12- .1.2 X=tension Beyond Limits of Property.
9i .1.3 Limits of $*tension.
90 Form of Posted Notices.
90,74 Failing Notices in Lieu of Posting.
9$75 Time of Hearing.
9876 Rules: Continuances.
9#77 . Failure: of Commission to Act.
.§J.78. Summary 4eni 1. .
Win n.6
ic Hearing. P.ublia hearings may be held whenever
desire.., in. any .matter relative to, adnilinistration of applicable
provisions of Division 9 (495, 556)
9870. 1 In any matter in which it is necessary to set a
public hearing, the City Clerk, upon receipt of the item or
transmittal, shall set such matter for a public hearing upon
deposit of the appropriate fees and. papers notwithstanding any
other provisions of this code to the contrary. (1231)
4870.2 Hearing By Commission Before Favorable Recommenda-
tion'. A. public hearing shall be held by. the Commission, or
its .authorized agent, prior to recommending that a conditional
exception be granted. (495, 556)
9870.3 (Repealed Ord. Nos.. 495, 556, 1782-11/72)
9871 llQtice of Hearing NewsoaRer- Publication. Notice of the
time, place and purpose, together with the boundary delineation
or description of the property or area under consideration,_ for
all public hearings held by either the Council or the Commis-
sion., shall be give by at least one (1) publication thereof in
a newspaper of general circulation in this city, ten (10) days
before the date of said hearing, except as provided by Section
9815 .3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (1524)
r
11/87
9872--9$75 - `9
Lo
9872 Additional Notice. If any such hearing is to be held c�i$i,
by the Commission, and is relative to a proposal which would -�``�
alter district boundaries, additional notice shall be given
by: (495, 556)
9872. 1 Posting Notices: Time. Posting public notices .,
thereof not less than 10 days prior to the date of .said hearing
mentioned therein.
9872.1. 1 Distance Between Notices. Such notices shall be
placed not more- than 300 feet apart along both sides of the
street and streets abutting the property said proposal seeks 'to
affect.
9872.1.2 Extension Beyond Limits of Property. Such posting
shall extend along said street or streets a distance of not.
less than 300 feet beyond the exterior limits of said property.
9872. 1.3 Limits of Extension. Posting shall not, however,
be required within 25 feet of or below the extreme high tide
line in the Shoreline District or more 600 feet in each
direction upon such street frontage from the building or the
actual area subject to the purpose for which the action is
requested.
9873 Form of gosted Notiges. Posted notices shall have a �
heading entitled"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING" printed in plain
type not less than one (1) inch in height, and in small type
there shall be a statement of the time, place and purpose of
said hearing, together with a description of the boundaries or
a general description of the property or area involved. (495, .
556, 1524)
9874 Mailing Notices in Lieu of Posting. In lieu of posting
notices of public hearings, as provided in Section 9873,
notices containing the same information as required for posted
notices, may be mailed. Such notices shall be mailed not less
than ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing .stated therein
to the owner or owners of the property described in said
notice, and to all persons owning property within three hundred
(300) feet of the described property, for which purpose the
latest address as shown on the Orange County assessor' s Roll
shall be used. (495, 556, 1524)
9875 Time of Hearing. If, in response to a proposal, a
hearing is to be called, it shall be called within sixty (60)
days after final environmental evaluation unless a time
extension is required by applicant, in writing, and the city
authorizes such extension of time. (2273 - 5/78)
11/87
I
w,' y
9876--9877
9876 Rules: Continuances. The Council and the Commission
may respectively prescribe its own rules and regulations for
conducting its hearing and taking testimony, and may continue
hearings, when necessary. (495, 556)
9877 Failure of Commission to Act. Failure of the
commission to take final action on any matter submitted in
accordance herewith, within thirty (30) days after the public
hearing., shall be considered a decision of the Commission
recommending that such matter or petition be denied, and
thereupon the Council may act directly as to the matter, but
under the same procedure and hearings prescribed for use by the
Commission; provided, however, that written agreements for
extensions of time in which to take final action may be made.
(2273-5/78)
9878 Summary Denial, The Commission may recommend that a
petition be denied and the Council may deny a petition without
a public hearing. (495, 556)
(Prior Law: 495 , 556, 1524 , 1782-11/72, 2273-5/78)
11/87
9870--9871
;}
Article 987
x. D
an
POP Public Hearing.
9870.1 Setting of Public Hearing.
987Q.2 Hearing By. Commission Before Favorable
Recommendation.
9§7Q.3 (Repealed Ord.: Nos. 495, 556, 1782-11/72)
9§7i Notice of Hearings. Newspaper Publication.
9012 Additional Notice.
9872.1 Posting Notices: Time.
9072. 1. 1 Distance Between Notices.
9$12. 1.2 Extension Beyond 'Limitsof Property.
9 Limits of Sztension.
97$ Form of Posted Notices.
9074 Mailing Notices in Lieu of Posting.
987.5 Time of Hearing.
9876 Rules : Continuances.
9871 failure of Commission to Act.
.9.878 Summary Denial .
4870 Public Hearing. Public hearings may be held whenever
desired in any matter relative to aft nistration of applicable
provisions of Division 9 (495, 556)
9870. 1 In any matter in which it is necessary to set a
public hearing, the City Clerk, upon receipt of the item or
transmittal , shall set such matter for a public hearing upon
deposit of the appropriate fees and papers notwithstanding any
other provisions of this code to the contrary. (1231)
9870.2 Hearing By Commission Before Favorable Recommenda-
tion*. A. public hearing shall be held by the Commission, or
its authorized agent, prior to recommending that a conditional
exception be granted . (495, 556)
9870.3 (Repealed Ord. Nos . 495, 556, 1782-11/72)
9871 Notice of Hearing Newspaper Publication. Notice of the
time, place and purpose, together with the boundary delineation
or description of the property or area under consideration, for
all public hearings held by either the Council or the Commis-
sion, shall be give by at least one (1) publication thereof in
a newspaper of general circulation in this city, ten (10) days
before the date of said hearing, except as provided by Section
9815 . 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (1524)
11/87
710
9872--9875 C11��
. ��-�-�-�-�� s
7 Z Notid If any such hearing is to be held
by the , ommission, and is relative to a proposal which would
alter district boundaries, additional notice shall be given
by: .(495, 556)
9fl72 1 'Posting Notices: Time. Posting public notices
thereof not less than 10 days prior to the date of .said hearing
mentioned therein.
9872. 1. 1 Distance Between Notices. Such notices shall be
placed not more than 300 feet apart along both sides of the
street and streets abutting the property said proposal seeks to
affect .
9872 1 2 Extension Beyond Limits of Property Such posting
shall extend along said street or streets a distance of not
less than 300 feet beyond the exterior . limits of said property.
9872. 1 3 Limits of Extension. Posting shall not, however,
be required within 25 feet of or below the extreme high tide
line in the Shoreline District or more 600 feet in each
direction upon such street frontage from the building or the
actual area subject to the purpose for which the action is
requested.
9873 Form of Posted Notices. Posted notices shall have a
heading entitled "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING" printed in plain
type not less than one (1) inch in height, and in small type
there shall be a statement of the time, place and purpose of
said hearing, together with a description of the boundaries or
a general description of the property or area involved. (495,
556, 1.524)
9874 Mailing_ Notices in Lieu of Posting. In lieu of posting
notices of public hearings, as provided in Section 9873,
notices containing the same _information as required for posted
notices , may be mailed. Such notices shall be mailed not less
than ten ( 10) days prior to the date of hearing stated therein
to the owner or owners of the property described in said
notice, and to all persons owning property within three hundred
(300) feet of the described property, for which purpose the
latest address as shown on the Orange County assessor ' s Roll
shall be used . (495, 556, 1524)
9875 Time of Hearing. If, in response to a proposal, a
hearing is to be called, it shall be called within sixty (60).
days after final environmental evaluation unless a time
extension is required by .applicant, in writing, and the city
authorizes such extension of time. (2273 - 5/78)
11/87
9876--9877
9876 Rules: Continuances . The Council and the Commission
may respectively prescribe its own rules and regulations for
conducting its hearing and taking testimony, and may continue
hearings , when necessary. (495, 556)
9877 Failure of Commission to Act. Failure of the
commission to take final action on any matter submitted in
accordance herewith, within thirty (30) days after the public
hearing, shall be considered a decision of the Commission
recommending that such matter or petition be denied, and
thereupon the Council may act directly as to the matter , but
under the same procedure and hearings prescribed for use by the
Commission; provided, however, that written agreements for
extensions of time in which to take final action may be made .
(2273-5/78)
9878 ummary Denial . The Commission may recommend that a
petition be denied and the Council may deny a petition without
a public hearing . (495 , 556)
(Prior Law: 495 , 556 , 1524 , 1782-11/72, 2273-5/78)
11/87
w..%
Office of the City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
1--v 2 2 ?g 1 N
P.O.BOX 190 ALIFORNIA 92648
Eli
024-151-09 3CHOWALTER, MICHAZE
04-035 115 6TH S7
\ HUNTINGTON BEACH{ 92648
:I.5 0:1.2506' . 1.:1./25/89
f i�!O T•: 1"'Y r)E::i�II�I-J" O Nl:-*W FaIJI:)F~f:::4:i i
(::I IM:XD
�� `.� '-a, f•tl:�:'T•I.1Fi'! T`:I:,); `rl�::.T�11':?1�::;f�:
.G .'"i- G i'3141:)I:::It
IJ
,K.
City of Huntington Beach
P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648.
nn y e
rf;> 0N-150-17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT
04-035 OF GENERAL SERVICES
REAL ESTATE DIV
650 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO, CA 95825
Office of the City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648`
. . . .. f`
1.
204-0 34 16 p�AE OF CALIFORNIA DE PT
GENERAL SERVICES
�- ' REAL ESTATE DIV
650 HOWE AVE
SACRAMENTO, CA
95825