Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPPSA 89-4 - ND 89-63 - CDP 89-63 - Seapoint Ave between PCH P. 056 485 750 I IRECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Calif orni-aCoa.s-t-al_09mm. Street and No. 245 W. Broadway, #380 P .gsta6d,zlLong Beach 90801-1450 Postage S Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered in m Return Receipt showing to whom. Date.and Address of Delivery a j TOTAL Postage and Fees S p Postmark or Date t� E 5 I U- a I H CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Director From Connie Brockway V" To Community Development City Clerk Subject Shell Oil Letter Date March 15, 1991 Re: PPSA — Seapointe The packet information you forwarded to this office will be placed in the PPSA file marked "Informational Material For File — not part of public hearing proceedings material ". Such notation is required in the event the file is subpenaed by the court. The court requires material presented to Council at the meeting. In this case, the letters were mentioned as left out of the packet, but they were not presented to Council . ��✓�2Z_„DLO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Connie Brockway Mi a Adams, Director To City Clerk From Community Development Subject INFORMATION FOR PRECISE PLAN Date March 11, 1991 OF STREET ALIGNMENT SEAPOINTE AVENUE FILE Ron Shankman representing Shell Oil dropped off the attached packet of information which he has requested be entered into the file for the Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Seapointe Avenue. The information was distributed the night of the Council Hearing, but was not entered into the record. MA:kj 1 xc: Hal Simmons, Senior Planner (8968d) Shell Western E&P Inc. A Subsidiary of Shell Oil Company P.O.Box 11164 Bakersfield,CA 93389 October 5, 1989 Mr. Louis F. Sandoval Director of Public Works City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Sandoval : SUBJECT: RW-70110 FACILITY STRIP HUNTINGTON BEACH FIELD ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CONCERNS REGARDING THE EXTENSION OF SEAPOINTE AVENUE NEAR PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Reference is made to my telephone conversation of October 4, 1989, with your Mr. Bruce Gilmore regarding the extension of Seapointe Avenue near Pacific Coast Highway. At that location, the proposed road crosses our facility strip. This strip contains oil field facilities which are used to process oil production from both onshore (Bolsa Leases) and offshore operations. Earlier this year we discussed with Mr. James W. Johnson of the Huntington Beach Company our concerns regarding the Seapointe extension. These concerns were set forth in our letter to Mr. Johnson dated March 17, 1989, a copy of which is enclosed. We hereby express these same concerns to you in order that you may incorporate them in the planning and construction stages. Please advise when we may meet with you to discuss. our concerns. My telephone number is (805) 326-5343. Very truly yours , Original Signed By A. S. KENNICOY Allen S. Kennedy Land Department California Division ASK:db Enclosure BBAY8927809-0001.0.0 (�1� cc: With Enclosure Mr. Bruce Gilmore City of Huntington Beach Mr. James W. Johnson Huntington Beach Co. 2120 Main St. , #260 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2499 BBAY8927809-0002.0.0 Shell Western E&P Inc. A Subsidiary of Snell Oil Company , P.O. Box 11164 Bakersfield,CA 93389 March 17, 1989 Mr. James W. Johnson Vice President-Development Huntington Beach Company 2.120 Main Street, No. 260 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2499 Dear Mr. Johnson: SUBJECT: PL-70096 RW-70110 HUNTINGTON BEACH FIELD ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROPOSED SEAPOINT AVENUE EXTENSIO Reference is made to our meeting of January 11, 1989, regarding your proposed 19 acre development and the extension of Seapoint Avenue through our facility strip. In that meeting you suggested that we list our concerns about extending Seapoint Avenue and that Ole jointly discuss these concerns with the City. There are currently two roads extending northwesterly and southeasterly along the full length of our facility strip (see map enclosed) to accom- modate vehicle traffic , including heavy equipment. The facility strip contains oil field facilities which are used to process oil production from both our offshore and onshore operations. Our onshore operations are located in the Bolsas which are located northwesterly of the facil- ity strip (see map enclosed) . The two facility strip roads accommodate traffic both on the facility strip and to and from the Bolsas. Our gate at Golden West Street is our only controlled access to and from the facility strip and the Bolsas . All traffic enters and leaves through this gate. The following are the concerns we have about the proposed extension of Seapoint Avenue: Safety: 1. Traffic Control : A. Traffic along our two facility strip roads would be disrupted. Movement of bulky, heavy equipment across a double lane highway would be extremely hazardous . Slow moving equipment could cause temporary blockage requiring some form of traffic control which, with 50+ MPH traffic could cause serious problems. BBAY8905101-0001.0.0 B. Shell Western E&P Inc. (SWEPI) and emergency vehicle response to our operations in the Bolsas would be hampered and slowed down. Vehicles parked on Seapoint could also block emergency vehicles . C. A hazardous traffic situation would be created at Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) and Seapoint. D. Traffic waiting to enter PCH from Seapoint would block our access across Seapoint. E. Electric gates would be required at our crossings , further impeding traffic on Seapoint. 2. Seacliff Development would no longer be isolated from direct contact with beach traffic. A. Increased crime associated with beach traffic with the addi- tional alcohol and drug related activities. B. Fire hazards from the use of illegal fireworks during summer months. C. Possible drug and alcohol problems due to beach parking on Seapoint and in Seacliff, including "overnightors" . 3. Routine well servicing and production activities could present hazards for cross traffic. A. Rig guy lines could occasionally cross Seapoint during move in/ rig up or rig down/move out operations. B. Oil from equipment could create slippery conditions and force the closing of the road during cleanup. SECURITY: 1. Automatic gates required for crossing Seapoint could result in uncontrolled entry onto the Lease during power failures, malfunc- tions, normal opening and closing. (High maintenance/low relia- bility experienced with existing automatic gates due to corrosive environment. ) 2. Increased security burden for the Seacliff Development because of greater access. BBAY6905101-0002.0.0 ENVIRONMENTAL: 1 . Seapoint would create environmental problems. A. SWEPI and agency response to environmental incidents in our operations in the Bolsas will be hampered and slowed down. B. Increased noise and odor levels for Seacliff residents , through 100'. opening in concrete wall , from well work, PCH and beach activities. C. Hydrocarbon discharges or sprays could contact passing traffic which may cause damage to the vehicles using Seapoint. D. Additional visual exposure to oilfield activities , including lights at night. OPERATIONS: 1. Seapoint would be a major obstacle in that it would divide two major lease roads . A. Day-to-day supervision of our operations in the Bolsas will be more difficult and less effective. . B. Automatic gates used to cross Seapoint could easily be blocked by street parking. C. A wall along Seapoint may present tie-down problems for well servicing equipment. D. Additional expenses would be necessary to repair pipelines under Seapoint. E. Job productivity, S41EPI and contract, could be significantly affected during peak traffic. F. An increase in permit loads (rigs , large equipment, etc.) since movement of this equipment must now cross a public road. If the Seapoint Avenue extension is constructed, in order to mitigate its affect upon our operations , we would require, among other things , the following: 1. Block walls installed between our facilities and Seapoint. 2. Installation of a need activated traffic signal at the intersection of the facility strip roads and Seapoint. BBAY8905101-0003.0.0 3. Installation of steel plated automatic gates where our roads cross Seapoint. 4. Numerous pipelines which would cross Seapoint would have to be buried and protected. 5. Landscaping along Seapoint to be installed and maintained at no expense to SWEPI . 6. No parking on the Seapoint Avenue extension. Please advise me when you are ready to discuss these concerns with the City or if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Original Signed By A. S. KENNEDY Allen S. Kennedy Land Department California Division ASK:bal Enclosures 4aAY8905101-0004.0.0 FACILITY STRIP----, ACCESS ROAD Y Pipe Storage, Cable S9 OF9ch -�_�-_ I Storage t qp\C+O 1 Tar*fa.•m I O �•o - 1 No.2 1 t _ 99 r----I trt«7ater ------ jn0 ti�i �nemigl Slor�e I'Gausric Flood I Injecl� t I I I Water 1 ec�l y ----- T L OBOLSA :-_. --------- ------- -------------�I� MavrPmChase--------------------------� --------- -OWLAND - - - - r oa wea1� J- 3lLLBOARD� �� _- ��_=Qaweos =-� i=� -------- —-oaweu----------- --------- PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - -,--ACCESS ROAD GOLDEN7ST GATE t 1 7 --fit r--t ��- r--- 1FhrlonPlanl r_-- ___ Guard Shark ! _= -� , ISlora e -�{ I t �Edison Sub-Station !___ ---_----- � —.-- �_-�- !Mist.Buildings r, T-"1 I15ludgeHanCting� I Steam Generalor _ Parking and t 1 ! I Tark FarmL_ -� v-_ r Misc-Buiidings (1 Steam I l No.t 1 I L_--- u l Main Cats r r I Generator i ,Misr Tanks I ra-__- � C }-•. L-_ _1 -� ` _ !I t _- l f I 1 Ylater <t-------- - -1 -- ' l ' ran _-_- --------- L------- I J l 1njeG t Cn ---- — — - - ------------ - --- Main Pi.- ------------------------L�-- �-=-----�-_ -- ran -- �1 MamPa'Gass.---------'-------------_.-- ui 03 Wells 1 O r-----------------1 r--------------- T --___ Od Wells - Od Stets Od WeBs T--"Ly We9s ad Weal T• _ r, O - --- - 1�------ --1 ---- --- F r---- i----- t t-----------r PACE COAST HIGHWAY extr•`t\\;........ \,\\\� II \\\\\\ Inhholi,l I \�'\. `' //�ti�i�.�'/ •-n�{ �.,;'•.+tl�`'..t7 13 �cv � '�. `�'�� `11t \\ �� .,III '. �—�.�1J •\�✓�/� �i'/�` '�.i I 0 .1 ( /-11E 11101.1 0' /) PROPOSED HOUSING •�• \'===.�• 1I + ' �[]Q SEAPO I NT• EXTENSION �.'` \\%)etNo / HUNTINGTON BEACH FIELD \� �`� o '� + \ ORANGE COUNTY, CA. 0 300 600 1200 1800 SCALE IN FEET CALIFORNIA CAD CARTOGRAPHY �o 9 o ON cn Vd o 0 �,p Ir yti n1'��o-:o� 6-le � •rt �r A11 � V •o_a •a.11 � �� �. A 6.4 Vlo ' � '. � ` Wes\ •e-e 1 f a I nr1 , 1� dye I SEAPOINT• EXTENSIOPf I II PROPOSED FIOUSING lo 1 v 104 1*1 // l IOT\ Ail 106 . WAi c•e . IIT'11Y1! li• 60L• 0 • 10 al0• a- IL „•, . 6L0• tr4• C . to . 1 lair trl n o = ea•-�- loo\ ti Y t I I� a 340. M r 503• c- „ /T-1 I�• y x !04• 0.4• I 0 A a 61• C•'r I •I N 431• \ nX On r Y {p • ��0 toy a r, eti - . go 4-0 • D ^ �0-20 • PI I le \0-7 �a-t4 1x I , 0-6 X5-10 �D•a l � • a-6 1 • � °'1' � .ITS f I N Jam• • -- ••• S I PROPOSED MOUSING SEAPOINT. EXTENSION ` { I quo I / i• IOT� q . IUD• IAAT C•6 ` { D 61• PIT'Hy to � � 0-2• 662• D10 • 65N., �n O 520• o al•' �n 5474 •. C hh n Y t { Dag-}- IOD� y 6 3 0• r 540• In 114 S $ i f--i I • j 1 O 656• F°'., � - V � , � • aDe , 65,• \ I { $64• a85• I x n } I ]• 12D 54 • l 11 I t D N tUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE 1r"1 PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE I( PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE f I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO 89-4/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO 89-46/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 89-63 (Establish precise alignment for Seapoint Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will ` hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below DATE/TIME Monday, May 21 , 1990 , 7 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER Precise Plan of Street Alignment No 89-4/ Coastal Development Permit No 89-46/Negative Declaration No 89-63 I APPLICANT City of Huntington Beach LOCATION Precise plan of Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street (see map) ZONE Various zoning districts (Industrial/Residential/ Recreation/Open Space) REQUEST Approve precise plan of street alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue i ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Covered by Negative Declaration No 89-63 COASTAL STATUS APPEALABLE (See Below) PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE (1) Staff Report, (2) Public Hearing , ' i (3) Planning Commission Discussion, and (4) Planning Commission action This pro]ect is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the I action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed to the California Coastal Commission by an aggrieved party Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrived -- An aggrieved person may file an appeal within ten ( 10) working days, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources Code, in writing to i California Coastal Commission 245 W Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City Council Action Applicants will be notified by the Coastal , Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Coastal Commission review Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date , ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street , j Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after May 18 , 1990 Connie Brockway City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Dated Mav 8 1990 RA-01 CZ I I� J �s� �ARFI L cc cz-- — F;14 0 C Z M2 0 CZ k L/ R4-0 CI-0 cz ROS 0 ? — — OS 0 Oti �� y P SFv , I r a � �p R4 29�0 CZ `�� RO R4 01 ' 9�F ROS 0 a 3 17 0 CZ R2 PU 0 Cz F �� R2 Po CZ ROS 0 i cR4 01 R4 C Fo xR2 PDO CZ \\ R'4 QI/ s� 9 R2PDOUT �� ro R2 PD 0 CZ \ _ I PPSA89-04/CDP89-46/ND89-63 >� S HUNTIN(TON BEACH HUNTlNGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 1 Auiborized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11, 1963 b STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and`not a party to or f interested in the below entitled matter. I am a 'n principal cleric of the ORANGE COAST DAILY , v PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of:. May 10, 1990 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. May 10, Executed on . , 199� at Costa Mesa, California. Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION 3 Page 3 - Council /Agent._ Ainutes - 7/16/90 that she believed the traffic model study should be before Council in order to make a decision and that the earthquake fault line should be explored before the decision of location is made and that the five foot contour lane be stop- ped. Commenting on another subject she requested .an increase in the community enrichment library fee. Ron Shenkman, representing Shell Western, sta!ithe y wish to take a coopera- tive and participatory role in the process as r facilities are impacted by the Seapoint connection. He spoke regardingo 1989 letters which were not in the City Council packet. Paul Brown, residen , presented an informal peti- tion to the City Clerk bearing approximately 114 signatures objecting to the density and height of the residential development proposed for the area west of Palm Avenue at Seapoint, and further objecting to any development in that area which will obstruct the view from SeaCliff residences, or the density of which will require connection of Seapoint to Pacific Coast Highway. Joseph Sulivan spoke in support of the alignment to ease present traffic con- ditions. He requested that Council approve the staff recommendation. Tom Harman, representing Citizens Against Rerouting Pacific Coast Highway (CARP) , spoke in opposition of the proposed project. He requested Council to continue the item until the Traffic Study is completed. He requested that Seapoint be connected with the terminus of Edwards . There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, to approve Negative Declaration 89-63; to approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Attachment No. 2 of the RCA dated May 21 , 1990, and to approve introduction of Ordinance No. 3045, after reading by title. An amendment to the main motion was made by Winchell , seconded by Green, to delete the southern portion of the Precise Plan and take off the reference of Garfield west to Seapoint. The motion FAILED by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winchell , Green NOES: MacAllister, Mays, Bannister, Silva ABSENT: Erskine The main motion made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, to approve Negative Declaration 89-63; to approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Attachment No. 2 of the RCA dated May 21 , 1990, and to approve introduction of Ordinance No. 3045, after reading by title, carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Green, Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Winchell ABSENT: None CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 20 , 1990 NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-4 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: Approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue. LOCATION: Precise plan of Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . Please be informed that the public hearing notification list provided to the City Clerk' s Office for this proiect did not include the Coastal Commission. X Approved Denied Withdrawn Conditionally approved Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final . The City Council action on this Coastal Development is appealable to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Public Resources Code S. 30603 and California Administrative Code S . 13319 , Title 14 . Pursuant to PRC S . 30603 , an appeal by an aggrieved person must be filed in writing, and addressed to : California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 1057K (Telephone:714-536.5227) Notice of Action Coastal Development Permit Page Two The appeal period begins when the Commission receives this notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days . Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Commission' s review period, and as to whether or not an appeal has been filed . Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date . Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that an application becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me CC: City Attorney Community Development Director PS: Minutes from the 7/16/90 meeting will follow under seperate cover. 1057K CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK / n • ,�, A�uZU� X•t�l.[. July 20, 1990 NOTICE OF ACTION COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-4 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: Approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue . LOCATION: Precise plan of Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . Please be informed that the public hearing notification list provided to the City Clerk' S Office for this project did not include the Coastal Commission. X Approved Denied Withdrawn Conditionally approved Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final . The City Council action on this Coastal Development is appealable to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Public Resources Code S . 30603 and California Administrative Code S . 13319 , Title 14 . Pursuant to PRC S . 30603 , an appeal by an aggrieved person must be filed in writing, and addressed to : California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 (Telephone:714-536-5227) Notice of Action Coastal Development Permit Page Two The appeal period begins when the Commission receives this notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days . Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Commission's review period, and as to whether or not an appeal has been filed. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that an application becomes null and void one (1) year after the final approval, unless actual construction has begun. Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:me CC: City Attorney Community Development Director 1057K BQp."gam ORDINANCE NO. 3045 i A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAPS 3 , 4 , AND 38 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 ALIGNING SEAPOINT AVENUE BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO GARFIELD AVENUE AND THE ALIGNMENT OF GARFIELD AVENUE WEST OF EDWARDS STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law, the California Government Code Sections 65493 et seq . , the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given held a public hearing, to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 to align Seapoint Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and Garfield Avenue and to align Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street ; and On July 16 , 1990 , after notice duly given, a public hearing was held before the City Council , and the alignment having been considered, the City Council finds that Precise Plan of Street Alignment is reasonable necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City and for the orderly development of the Community; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Huntington Beach does resolve as follows : SECTION 1 . That the real property hereinafter described and shown on District map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) marked Exhibit A, District Map 4 (Sectional District Map 4-6-11) marked Exhibit B; District Map 38 (Sectional District Map 34-5-11) marked Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is w� amended to include Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 of the City of Huntington Beach: -1- The precise centerline alignment of Seapoint Drive between Pacific Coast Highway and Garfield Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach through portions of Sections 3 and 4 T. 6 S. , R11W, and Section 34 , TSS, R11W, S.B .M. as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps , Records of Orange County, California, more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the northwesterly terminus of that certain course shown as "N 43034 ' 50" W 3 , 542 . 38 '" on a map recorded in Book 97, Page 35, 36 , and 37 of Records of Surveys , Records of Orange County, said point also being on the northeasterly right of way line of Pacific Coast Highway as shown on said map, thence south 43034 ' 50" east 22 . 00 feet along said northeasterly right of way line to the point of beginning ; thence leaving said right of way line at right angles , north 46025 ' 10" east 240 . 34 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 1, 100 . 00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve 154 . 07 feet through a central angle of 08001 * 31" to a point of compound curvature with a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 800 . 00 , a radial line to said point bears north 35033 ' 19" west; thence northeasterly along said curve 363 . 70 feet through a central angle of 26002 ' 53" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1, 100 . 00 feet , a radial line to said point bears north 09030 ' 26" west ; thence northeasterly along said curve 233 . 17 feet through a central angel of 12008 ' 42" ; thence north 68020 ' 52" east 174 . 35 feet to the centerline intersection of Seaview Avenue and Palm Avenue as shown on a map recorded in Book 166 , Pages 10 and 11 of Parcel Maps , Records of Orange County; thence along the :i centerline of Seaview Avenue as shown on said Parcel Map north 68020 ' 52" east 1, 839 .47 feet to a tangent curve concave -2- 3045 .� A northwesterly having a radius of 800 . 00 feet; thence Northeasterly } along said curve 372 . 02 feet through a central angle of 26038 ' 39" ; thence north 41042 ' 13" east 164 . 55 feet to the end of Seaview Avenue l as shown on said Parcel Map; thence leaving said Parcel Map north 41042 ' 13" east 253 . 71 feet to a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 1, 000 . 00 feet; thence northeasterly along said curve 367 . 38 feet through a central angle of 21002 ' 58" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1, 000 . 00 feet, a radial line to said point bears north 27014 ' 49" west ; thence northeasterly 638 . 45 feet along said curve through a central angle of 36034 ' 45" : thence north 26010 ' 27" east 50 . 00 feet to an intersection with the precise centerline alignment of Garfield Avenue, said point also being "Point 'A'" as shown on the description for the precise alignment of the centerline of Garfield Avenue. The precise centerline alignment of Garfield Avenue between Edwards Street and the westerly city boundary, in the City of Huntington Beach, through section 34 , T. 5S . , R11W, S . B .M. as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the centerline intersection of Garfield Avenue with Edwards Street, as shown on a map recorded in Book 97, Pages 35, 36 , and 37 of Records of Surveys, Records of Orange County; thence north 89041 ' 09" west 180 . 00 feet to a tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2,400 . 00 feet; thence northwesterly 1, 083 . 17 feet along said curve through a central angle of 25051132" to Point "A" , said point being the intersection with the centerline of Seapoint INS 4 Drive, a radial line to said point bears south 26010 ' 27" west; thence continuing 786 . 51 feet more or less along said curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 2 , 400 . 00 feet through a central -3- 3045 angle of 18046 ' 36" to the westerly boundary limits of the City of Huntington beach. SECTION 2 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California on the 6th day of August 1990 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk C�ttorney � 5 D v REVIEWED AND -APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Admin strator Director of Community Development -4- F'L4'4']NING i ZONING DM 3 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 3-6-II - ° ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE CITY OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 754 Or''fyL�i.L:O"Gi r�0 T01�ML LC« [C zANE ZONE LEGEND -� AMEN DE FA S� ORD-NO- AMENDED C�3`A F ORD.NO.;yam i .Sin�.L Orf inic Knc} Tu 0(xy T.PC.9oCNTlAI pSTRCI 5-7-62 234 899.�- 2-5-%9 70-a 23a r , 1 B.28 60 REO1a J woL•:r..w'«^vur•.[L[xE9vfi0iOrNx aTRl1AE Lf 1 0DpE NSnI rW4RK T 2-21-6 S � 6 1-1q-882 BI-la 21l6 rg0n4 6-2066 6619 21 6- 3 B3-B 26a0 cxoo <oEncL� N 3I � CII - a9 "6 LOrCN fP[E Dlfacr p lI � � � 918� 1 482 SrMfl b-17-GB 681] 1f 19 1.1] ti3 ftf7CO2 W 26CC I." 7 :<>�"E5 F° 1E 1— STREET•uOxwExr :G5R7 B7 2291is "--. ...=r.•.t�srccr / ( 1f` ( \ 2 1.br; 6831 a72 9-�9-OB BR-9 J9571 ram___ cc•.�. �,,"yL Peocyc r�nx iN exF• \ . 1 ( : . \' T l . :` 1, I I''�/ I f �\ 1 A 0,70 69']a 1562 f0_�.EJ ar:.L [ 0M E.QMKNWE51 '0 19 70 70 q 16G6 _ 1 E.•vE.ON fr,6 fCvfN Tx fI ON. 5-3 -71 71-1 :6a3 j('� [.•5[xx•nN O�SiRKT 1-3-72 71 37 i 706 5.15-72 /2 13 :746 ci w+vtl�T.o..9opr[Ta« r.7-72 72-ifAGi 1761 .o -15-73 72�35 1013 1-2-73 12 39 853 - ^•• •r �.. R„ycr10N 10:15-73 '73-20 1976 I�PZ '-=:w•al osTct*0 />• _ a.i6.'!a >3�l1 :9a3 '//. r.lS;C tint rv7 7.� l D^ - 2-19-76 ❑PSA19 52024 -- 7-•= =___---- - -- 1f MM2-0—CZ, CI -0 RA 01 CD R4-0 , ROS-0 M2 01 CD' R4 01 P _ R I R4-01.,•, 9.L r —RI ROS-0 RI RIRI Yi ° ?-111 R I ROS-0 i7/ RI RI F\RI ILr \ Rl RI j jRl 6 I x Qz qo RSA o� ROS-0 ` . -- n RI o.c l It L RI ;RI R4-01 — a y CG q _ / /r ;a 61f" \t1 -RI /tir/ rc r O CZ� v /,,R RZ-PD- a S-0 A •�' " `IR2-P CZ D-O- ( RO \I tz�..g-3''�!-ut.; _ i o i 71 ,U i .%^r•c•a I R2-PD-0-CZ "1 RI . e� / R1-0 (R4-01-CZ •3' :-Z R,.•• t R t. ROS-O-CZ••\•, / \/RI•i \.j• Iv 0y' k RI RI-0 01 lk. w I—f7 O c - c R,u'>.J+�I SRI � R I��o R I 0 4 •I noL ' 7 .o fir{ R �,�.. Ri C - a o J.a, pL.ct e` I».._3- /7�.'s ` '�.•l aC.. ____—_mob_ O-C2t` P / .•`,`'r/''a It .,•''. C C I-0 RI 0 �'�a.° ��t RI-0.- 'C� �9ti M2-01-CZ °� . �\o ;oc1 TA ' 14 0, 'C,'> P • 3 Vic. PLANNING", ZONING DM 4 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 4-6-II & 5-6-I I NOTE L DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF ADOPTED YaACN 7,1960 OT '.c.E Aa1DIxlxD axr RIUT or wA TENDED i0 EXTEND TO Tr( CENT" IS SUCK RIGHT 01 r CITY COUNCIL ORDNANCE NO. 754 LEGEND; ZONE ORD ZpNE ORD. RM IM.—VIAL DISTRICT AMENDED CASE Ho, AMENDED CASE NO, [� NE,DRM DENSTY RESIDENTIAL DISTINCT NEOEM-HON DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 12-3-62 281,282 936 ffL —DENSITY RESIDENTIAL pSTRN;T HLJNTINGTON BEACH 222-6fi 545 86 L�D NEICHRORHOOD CONNERCIAL DISTRICT 10:19:70 70-10 16 C4 qA RE SIDExl1AL eLRKULTURAL dSi RICT 7-2-73 72-39 1a-, RESIDENTIAL SPACE­—Cl 5-4-81 DO-6 2a`2 $IIORELINE D S-R,C• 1-IB-82 81-14 2536 [Z CJeS TeL 20xE S+ffr i / 2-22.83 82-20 26-_^-T i� R A N G E (10 L N T Y C A L I I�0 R N I A 9-19-63 PP83-1 26a'. © PLANNE CDNSERv l" DISTRICT 7-2-64 84-7 27C< PD PLANNED DEVELOPUENT I-17-83 FLOOD ZONE 2ELE O'CO.IBINIx4 OIL PROWCrIOn DISrgICi -a jCOIN91N'NG OIL PRODUCT—E•STN.CT COI:COMB'NINU OIL PROO:CT—. IC' (-"fL00DItAIN C6rRKi . r/�WiNw fLOW ZME s, I i + cc-cz o o_c cti P os-o \. R4-29-0-CZ e-nf�YE� -'yY�,c`{'�♦ -'.F it:--"L+i 'IW.'.WOGR.G4 . �.O 9`S �/ + � 1_`?'•.fir:,; � o `� a --_; �R3 17-0-CZ °4 R2-PD-0-CZ. 'c s oy4` c'x0,, c� a ti q\ 01 l PLANNING ZONING DM 38 o SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 34- 5-11 NO ADOPTED AUGUST 15, .960 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET CITY OF � 70HE AD DINING ANY RIGHT OF WAY IS N INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO...p 785 OF SUCH RIGHT OF wav AMENDED ZASE ORO.NO AMENDED CASEORD N0. LEGEND" — 0 RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.DISTRICT 6-3-63 315 970 I-I'•-H2 81.3 25'0 � C-FNE0 1I1H—RRO 1 1- HL�NTIN(1TON BEACH 4_5_65 SDS 1132 B-82BI112531 OMBINEpwITHOIL NniCI 12.5-66 66�491271 1-18-62 BI-I4 2536 (� L'lw DEnsnr RES+iFHTla1,p15TR^' 2-l-09 68 46 IAo' S 5-82 82-2 2553 [_] ND�STR�nL D15TR�CT 6 26-'70 70-8 1576 4-19-N2 82-3 2551 I-'°] MNERgaL D15t R••:+ EO-19-70 '0 10 16C6 �) - 7 12-5.8383.4B2666 R�Er rtVlencF• .L OIL 1I.-FINOnNrDr T r D 'R -17-7, 71KTIP -9 1659 7 . 1 1\ G E' (A) I% N 1 1 , C A 1,1FO R I A. IO-8-7 71-26 68. 1D-14-8585.32]( 1-17-72 71-17 1709 I-7-83FLOODZU£2606 [1=] 2-22-]2 ].44 :72 6-688 8]-12 2944 IO 1 -7 2957 73-20 1876 6-26-69 89-1 8 —11.CLAS—CArON 4.74 _rrNRAln11 74 22 1977 C j RFCNEaTIGN OrEN SRACE 9-IS-75 14.5 2010 �7 ..,,„Tr 9Us.NEss OIS�RIcr 7-6 '76 74 22 2077coe5ra:.7;NI. 21--r1 77-IS 2229 _ COASTAL 9q.N:IAar _i 77 76 r. _... 3 4.!!/ • % l/ 7d,F U�/ F _. _.._ . le RI-CZ " -.._2�.: RI-CD-CZ Ft�----------o:-i— Rz L �_"" I RI-CZ J��Fo�Rrcz rRi-cz RI-CD-CZ J o It RI N j _ cti IRII RI RI RI lal ij \ RI CZ 1 u 1,L, N nI - RI-CZI S �� I: " L—J=L_ R�\� �� � e / yRl-CZ //z/ _U V� \" T'�J:�� N\ `�.�l ml /,i•' 01 J ./ , 3 III A"3 CF-R Yr�RKZ 5.:' (PREZONED) R I-C (PREZONED) / RI ROS-0 CD CF-R i C2 .0 (PRFZONED) RA-0 _-- mf . E I -- j: KTA ELLIS-GOLDENWEST SPECIFIC PLAN N 09•aI'S1'w ,16.l0 RA-01 OF II RA-01-CZI / 3 I O "M'S 09•41'07'E 9 GARFIELD AVE. SIE Ord. No. 3045 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 16TH day of JULY 1990 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 6TH day of AUGUST 19 90 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council . AYES: Councilmembers: Mays, Bannister, Silva, Erskine NOES: Councilmembers: WinchP11 ABSENT: Councilmembers: MacAllister, Green City Clerk and ex-officW Clerk of the City Council of the City LL= of Huntington Beach, California Ir, t ` ..M• r� t 4� PLEASE GIVER FO FOR.PUBLIC:COMMENTS%PUBLIC HEARINGS TO THE t r SERGEANT-AT"ItMS�WHO'�IS LOCATED`NEAR S'THE•SPEAKER' ',PODIUM ' F 1 Welcome to.a Meeting of the. '+ HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCII:/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The public may address the Council/Agency on any item on the agenda or items of interest during the section of the. meeting devoted to Public Comments. There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. No speaker may use the time of any other person. The public is invited to address the City CounciURedevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are called before the Council/Agency. DATE: YOUR NAME Telephone I�Z(0 O Pleas Print ADDRESS Z(2¢7 l 0S;• v►,mN C,Ta� — t� C(ZCoq y Street City Zip Code PLEASE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM _ CHECK ONE BOX ❑ PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant—at—Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELC- OME The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) t--.lid l _{_; J .t 3 -_ f♦S. - l mil.+ Y�l l`, �'. ♦ A j;�k 9. PLEASE GIVE FORM FOR-PUBLICsP:COMMENTS%PUBLIG:HEARINGS-`6--THE _ ry t." r SERGEANT=AT-ARMS WHO IS LOCATED NEi4R THE SPEAKER'S'`PODIUMF� Y Welcome to•a Meeting of the t{ ; HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY r . The public may address the Council/Agency.on any item on the agenda or items of interest during the section of the meeting devoted to Public Comments. There is a time limit of . three minutes per speaker.. No-speaker may use the time of any other person. The public is invited to address the City Council/Redevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are called before the Council/Agency. DATE: �/-/w- 9 0 YOUR NAME C�'r,��'� FQ.�2� Telephone Please Print / ADDRESS 7/ Al.Yf m` �CQ �j• ,Q 2- Street City Zip Code PLEASE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM - CHECK ONE BOX ❑ PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant-at-Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELCOME The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) gig - r - ^. --_ - Y.• ?..f �a t..��t,NF. C - 4 }-1 -•T S 1 h.t.J h PLEASE'GIVE FORM FOR PUBLIC COMIVENTSYP ARINGS ' SERGEANT=AT ARMS WHO IS LOCATED NEAR`THE SPEAKER'S PODIUM, L 3 Welcome to a Meeting '::HUNTINGTON,BEACH CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: The public may address the Council/Agency on any item on the agenda or items of interest during the section of the meeting devoted to Public Comments .There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. No speaker may.use the time of.any other person. The public is invited.to address the City Council/Redevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are called before the Council/Agency. DATE: `/ . _ YOUR NAME � 7C��T" Telephone /Please Print ADDRESS �v v C-' �\z Street y City P Zi Code C . PLEASE L]C PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM CHECK ONE BOX: ❑ PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City CounciVRedevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant—at—Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELCOME 4 The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. a The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or l pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency). ?.fit 1. a ' `L'e'._T¢ f 1. .: f •.{.ny- r',1,_ lrlr"".IG. 4,n:1 PLEASE GIVE FORM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC--f' 00HEI SERGEANT" ARMS WHO IS LOCATED NEAR THE SPEAKER'S PODIUMe, t � - -i•. f 4 z-/ - - y `' --.+{7 a cc...xy.."i � 'lt C� ♦',��y%, . J' try r i f-v ti d Wellcome to a Meetmg.of the HUNTINGTON BEACH:CITY_COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT,`AGENCY The public may address the Council/Agency on any item on the agenda or,items of interest- during the section of the meeting devoted to Public Comments: There'is a;time limit of three minutes per speaker. .No speaker may.use the time-of any other.person. 'The public is invited to address the City Council/Redevelopment Ageney,on Public Hearing agenda.items when those items are called before the Council/Agency.. DATE: YOUR NAME '�� '✓� �'`�� Telephone Please Print � ADDRESS I��l SC-_A"64&0 k:�, Jyj T'" Street City Zip Code PLEASE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM ` CHECK ONE B ❑OX PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant—at—Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELCOME The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. it may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) PLEASE GIVE FORM FOR PUBLIC CO M AENTS/PUBLIC HEARING5 TO THE _ SERGEANT=AT==AR�'RiS WHO IS'LOCATFi't RTEAR,THE SPEAKER'S-PODIUM r 4 r � Y Welcome;to:a Meeting,ofaht ;< HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNciL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY _ The public may.address the CounciVAgency on any item on the agenda or items of interest during.the.section of the meeting devoted to Public Comments..There is a time limit of three minutes per speaker. No speaker may.use the.time of any other person. The public is invited to address the City Council/Redevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are-called before the CounciVAgency. DATE: Z��G � -�� YOUR NAME �l d �=/�� �U L Z_ /L_/A}L/ Telephone Please Print ADDRESS D/ Street City Zip Code PLEASE ❑ PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM CHECK ONE BOX [] PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. , u Give this form to the Sergeant-at-Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. WELCOME The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the CounciVAgency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) ..PLEASE'�GIVE°-FORM-FO"aLIV7-z`ICOMMENTS/PUBLIC--HEARINGS THE 'SE ................ROEAN RW ATED'NEAR:,-THE,,"SPEAKEk�STODIUM�k.,.,:�....� T� WHOJS e.-166ii jqa M, �. eeting. HUNTINGTON BEACH'.CITY�,COUNCIL/REDEVELOPME14T.AGENCY The public may address the C6uncil/A. gency on any item on the akeinda or items of interest during m e-n'"t s-'. Th '-- time limit of ' is the section' of the meetingdevoted to Public Comments. ere three minutes per speaker. No speaker may use the time of any other person. The public is invited to -address the City Couhcil/Redevelopment Agency on Public Hearing agenda items when those items are called before the Council/Agency. DATE: YOUR NAME /�Aep 4m/vTelephone lease Print ADDRESS Street city Zip Code PLEASE PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM D CHECK ONE BOX ❑ PUBLIC COMMENTS Fill in Agenda Item if speaking on specific item. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency is interested in your comments. However, policy does not permit taking immediate action on most items brought to the Council/Agency through Public Comments. Give this form to the Sergeant—at—Arms who is located near the speaker's podium. The Mayor/Chairman will call all speakers for both Public Comments and Public Hearings. All proceedings are recorded. W ,ELCOME The Huntington Beach City Council/Redevelopment Agency welcomes you to this meeting. The Council/Agency meet regularly at 7 p.m. the first and third Mondays of each month. Study sessions and special sessions may be called for other times in the month. All sessions of the Council/Agency, except Closed Sessions which deal with such matters as personnel or pending litigation, are open to the public, and the public Is encouraged to attend. Agendas are available to the public at the Office of the City Clerk, Huntington Beach Central Library and the Library annexes the week prior to regular meetings. Please recognize that members of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency receive their agendas complete with supporting information several days before the meetings, thus giving them an opportunity to study the information and to ask questions of the professional staff before the meeting. It may appear that some items before the Council/Agency are handled in a routine manner, but the members traditionally study all items carefully before meetings. Thank you for your interest in city government. Mayor and Councilmembers (City Council) Chairman and Members (Redevelopment Agency) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0A_/ INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION /S- HUNTINGTON BEACH Mike Uberuaga Mike A ams, Director To City Administrator From Community Development Subject SEAPOINT AVENUE Date June 20, 1990 On May 1, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a Precise Plan of Street Alignment for the connection of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street. On May 21, 1990, the City Council deferred adoption of the same Precise Plan of Street Alignment pending the review of results from the Huntington Beach Traffic Model . It is anticipated that information from the traffic model will be available for review by the City Council at their meeting of July 16, 1990 . In response to the Council ' s hesitancy to adopt the Seapoint/ Garfield precise alignment, staff has initiated meetings with Public Works and Fire to explore the feasibility of creating a temporary Seapoint/Garfield connection with a slightly different alignment . It is staff ' s assessment that a temporary connection is feasible and desirable as an interim means of providing vehicular access to the Seacliff area . The Huntington Beach Company, however, is opposed to constructing a temporary road, and continues to favor construction now of the ultimate alignment and design of the Seapoint/Garfield connection. Staff will discuss these issues with the City Council on June 25, 1990 . MA:HS:kla (6176d) 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Michael T. Uberuaga From Mikel dams, Director City Administrator CoDevelopment Subject INTERIM ACCESS CONNECTION FOR Date June 6, 1990 TRACT 13527: THE ESTATES TO EDWARDS STREET On May 21, 1990, the City Council directed staff to bring back the condition of approval on tract 13527 which requires the opening of Seapoint Avenue to the various existing developments in the Seacliff area. The Council also discussed the idea of continuing the requirement for an access road opening for a minimum of 18 months . The specific condition on Tract 13527 requires the following: Seapoint Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall be open to the public prior to the occupancy of the first unit. Design and width of the connection shall be subject to the review and approval by Public Works, Fire and Community Development Departments and final approval by the Planning Commission. In response to the condition on Tract 13527, the developer submitted full street improvement plans in late 1989 for the precise location and complete improvements for Seapoint Avenue between their project and the western extension of Garfield Avenue. Staff initiated Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 in order to process the street improvement plans and to comply with the condition on Tract 13527. Staff has analyzed the City Council ' s direction and recommends the following : The developer shall provide an interim public access connection between Tract 13257 and Edwards Street in order to improve general circulation and to provide necessary emergency response access . The interim connection shall provide a 40 foot wide paved right-of-way to include two 12 foot travel lanes and 8 foot aprons, and shall be designed to accomodate travel speeds ` -- of 30 miles per hour through the curve into Garfield Avenue. �. Design of the interim access connection shall be subject to the review and approval of Public Works, Fire and Community Development Departments. Mr. Uberuaga Page Two Staff cannot support delaying the necessary access connection for Tract 13527. In lieu of full street. improvements for Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue, staff will work with the developer to design an interim connection which will comply with minimum requirements. MU:MA:RLF:kj 1 xc: Louis Sandoval, Director Public Works Raymond Picard, Fire Chief Ronald Lowenberg, Chief of Police Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer (6015d) • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH ' To Michael T. Uberuaga From Raymond C. Pica City Administrator Fire Chief Subject SEAPOINT CONNECTION/ Date May 30, 1990 CROSS-GAP CONNECTOR Recent decisions by the City Council to delay or possibly deny the extension of Seapoint from Garfield to Pacific Coast Highway leaves me with serious concerns for the protection of citizens in this area as well as protection for the City as a whole. In the development of the City's Master Plan, a "Fire Hazard/Fire Protection Study" dated July 1974 (see attached) was undertaken to assure future protection of our citizens. This study formed the basic foundation for the fire protection that is in place today. Many of the shortfalls that were brought out in the study have been mitigated through sound planning with management, council, and citizen support. A few of these items are improved building and fire codes that require smoke detection systems in all residential occupancies, sprinkler protection in all new buildings over 5,000 square feet, a sophisticated 911 system that aids in reducing response times, a non-combustible roof ordinance, improved safety equipment for our firefighters, and relocation of Warner Fire Station. These improvements along with a partial Opticom system (changes traffic signal to green for Code 3 response) have maintained the level of protection to the City while reasonable growth was taking place. The Seacliff IV Development has stretched the fire department's ability to respond beyond acceptable limits. At present, there is only one (1) access to the development which is Palm Avenue. The response time under good conditions is in excess of our five '(5) minute standard and in many cases in excess of nine (9) minutes. These developments are adjacent to oil production which increases the potential for an industrial accident such as a major fire or chemical release. Should this occur, the only egress and access for the citizens and fire department is Palm Avenue. Palm Avenue runs adjacent to and down wind from the major oil production area. Citizen evacuation from this area will be greatly improved with the connection of Seapoint to both Garfield and Pacific Coast Highway. These streets are essential safety elements placed in the General Plan through analysis and with special intent. The fire protection study in 1974 called for a fire station to be located at Talbert and the Cross-Gap Connector, with Bolsa Chica, Graham, Springdale, Talbert, and Garfield intersecting the connector. This road system is vital to the protection of the Bolsa Chica/Holly-Seacliff, Seacliff IV, and all homes below Warner and west of Edwards. It is also equally important to the existing developments in the north/central and north/western sections of the City. This is the key interlink that ties the five (5) minute response system together for the entire City. SEAPOINT CONNECTION/ CROSS-GAP CONNECTOR May 30, 1990 Page 2 The fire department has placed conditions on the Seacliff Tract 13527(R) development that requires the connections of Seapoint to Garfield before occupancy. This is to allow access to this development from our Gothard facility for fire and medical response. We have also conditioned the development of Tracts 14134 & 14135 to provide a temporary fire station in the Bolsa Chica area to provide the level of service equal the standard received in other parts of our City; i.e., five (5) minutes eighty percent (80%) of the time. The entire fire/medical protection plan is based on good traffic flow, access and egress of all development, and mutual aid from other communities. All of these factors have been integrated into the General Plan. The fire protection study in 1974 stated that the development of the Bolsa Chica would create an imbalance of fire protection that would require a new fire station in the area of Talbert and Bolsa Chica (Cross-Gap Connector) within five (5) to ten (10) years. This new station would be coordinated with the move of Heil Station to Graham and Edinger to improve a deficiency in the Huntington Industrial Park and Huntington Harbour areas. This 1974 study and plan is still accurate with the conditions that exist today. From a fire/life safety standpoint, the fire department cannot support any future developments or the opening of the developments now under construction without the conditions placed on them being enforced. I request your strong support on these safety issues to assure a safe and well-planned community. RCP/TH/sr Attachment cc: Mike Adams, Community Development Director Richard Barnard, Deputy City Administrator Ron Lowenberg, Police Chief Lou Sandoval, Public Works Director Jim Vincent, Fire Marshal Fred Heller, Operations Officer Tom Huntley, Deputy Fire Marshal/Development 0380f Authorized to Publish Advertisements o, all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange �O County, Cal'Ifomia, Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11, 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, _ printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, PUBLIC NOTICE County of Orange, State of California, and that i LEGAL NOTICEI ORDINANCE.NO4045 attached Notice is a true and complete copy as I- "AN_ORDINANCE OF •::: :THE CITY COUNCIL;OF...: was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, `t-HUNTINGTONIBEACK.- sp•": AMENDING THEae 9, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain aHUNTINGTON BEACHA: •ORDINANCE.COD&BN4+ Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and *•AMENDINGOISTRICTW, MAPS 3 4-AND 38 ,z J Laguna Beach Issues of said newspaper to wit TO LAN OF STREET-'c I � - PLAN OF STREET + I the issue(s) of: ALIGHMENT NO 89 4 I ALIGNING dEAPOINT) - 'AVENUE'BETWEEN PACIFIC;COAST-VA" I GARFIELDtAVENUE N" i August 17 199� ALIGNMENT`OF 1 GARFIELD'AVENUE ` WEST OF"_'' EDWARDS STREET"' SYNOPSIS,•. - >-1." Ordinance No:,.3045' 'amends the Huntington) Beach Ordinance, Code, S.9061,by adopting Precise) Plan of Street Alignment of Seapoint Avenue south to� Pacific Coast Highway and 'north' to:--Garfield-:Avenue ;and to extend Garfield Av- enue+wesf 6f Edwards Street which Is-reasonablyfnecess= ary to the orderlyAind effi=, clent flow of�trafq&,: for thej preservation=of 1they health: and safety the.InFi atii of' tants of the'City,and fort he order ly,development of It a Corn_'' munit THE:TULL TEXO FI�THEi 0RDI NANO PIS`AVAIL-'ABEE declare, under penalty of perjury, that the IN THE CITY•"CLERKS OF ` FICE. ! --1;' foregoing is true and correct. ADOPTED"tiy` the-City' Council of the City of Hunt- Ington Beach at a regular August 17 meeting field Monday Executed on gg August 6,-+1990 by"the fol i lowing roll call vdie: at Costa Mesa, California. AYES: Mays :Bannister;' Silva,Erskine NOES:Wmchell ABSENT MacAllister 'Green CITY OF HUNTINGTON Signature City C BEACH, Brockway; Published" Orange!Coast Daily Pilot`August 17 1990 F-621 PROOF OF PUBLICATION AMENDMENTS PLANNtODIINIS OD.� COU CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL aiW COUNCIL - STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 4368 DEC.12,1976 y LEGEND: FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY w° MAJOR 45,000 PRIMARY_ -_ —3Q000 " SECONDARY —20,000 NOTE: SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT'OF WAY 5 - DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS s a a %, Ll 1 � O CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA o 4 •n � w, «. O ...w. CM.I-.o ALL REAL I*1C: �%� rA"!E �.-E Q,U E S !S r. iVE: BE :N F' ES - PRE:S EE - N/T0 FTC ' ? %11: 0. 3.,711 J..J�'1 116 AzaIe,a E EG.eT`er Ti -io-Toa'_ C. IiI M-aT M.c.ore F:obert PatT%ici-a Frost 1931") Arch-field Cir 19:=,'21 Archfielu Cir- 19325 Archfield Cir Hiantingt-on Be-ach ,Cia `,'26-48 L-Iilnting-ton Beac -. ,Ca 92C48 HF.antington Beiach ,C,a 92648 �K LAE S C0 4FF'LL\= /1 Ralph H. Bauer Lorraine Faber TEI� *�K.� L BE:L� FFI�{T�'S� 16511 Cotuit Circle Amiaos de Bolsa Chica J Huntington Beach, CA 92649 P.O. Box 3748 Huntington Beach, CA 92605 02337147 0223 37148 02337149 Billy E Almedu .at;E: T odor-e F' 3 Gloria _.atir7 Ger-je M & Carol Pierson 19306 Champion Ln 19302 Champion Ln 19296 Champion Ln Hllntingtori Be!ac:h ,C,.-i 9.''6'4'8 E%e!:icI-i.C,a 9-264:_, E-11-tntingtoi: Retach ,r`a 92648 iqy- - ELS CO0Pwrz-T'E-D 13 'ADELS PANTED 02339126 02339127 02339128 Robert C & Adrien Atherton Jerry R & Deborah Wood Terry W & Sandra Paulos 19256 Coldstream Ln 19252 Coldstream Ln 19246 Coldstream Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02339129 02339130 02339131 Lloyd L & Rita FlaKer George M Frahm Emily L Coffin 19242 Coldstream Ln 19236 Coldstream Ln 19232 Coldstream Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02339132 02339133 � 02339136 Estates Seacliff ',, ACILIFF ESTAJE-S Seacliff On The Greenscom 2 1 I-Or MAI ST' H, ton Be IrvineyCa 92714 2110 M!�-�St N 96 Corporate ParK *300 V -i< HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 t 9 q L: F.: WAR r 126 IN now 02337153 02337154 02337155 James E 8 Barbara Heili David A Boose Larry D 8 Evelyn Williams 19272 Champion Ln 19281 Champion Ln 19285 Champion Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 G_o37156 Alfred & Ann Grossman 19291 Champion Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 ** LABELS COMPLETED L EL_S\F'RIMTED% 02337182 02337183 02337184 Theodore W NecK Emilio J Tercero John B & Debby Desmond 19296 Archfield Cir 19292 Archfield Ln 19286 Archfield Cir Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 r 02339137 02339138 Ciub Series Of SeacIiffho CLUB SERIES OF SEACLIFF 6 18 Sj er Spu d 608 SILVE-t-SPUR RD--- Ro ing HiI Esta es, .•a 90ti74 ROLL-rit HILLS-ESTATES CA 11001550 11001 56 Signal Companies Inc Hunti.n-0=ton. Reach Camp,anY , 17890 SKY PorK Ci r �F �0�E►0:; 76��.1 i - Irvine,Ca 92"714 San Franciscop a 94120 ** COMPLETED *** LABELS PRINTED- - 02333134 . 02333135z--,,, 02333136 P PENINS LA I\P PENMSULA /� I ,F PEN SU A 52 BROAD AY SUM E ' 00 52MROADWAY\-SULTE '1100 52p0. B�ADWAY SUITE 00 SAN MO ICA, CA 90401 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 SA MONICA, 90401 02333131 02333138� 02333139 P PENIN, UL 1 P PENINSULA Se�acliff On The Greenscom 0 BRO�DWAY UITE " 0 520ROADWFlY SUI�E' 100 96 Corporate F'�arK 4300 SA A NICA, 04Q� S'AN'TA MONIbA-,--CA 9001- Irvine,Ca 92714 _ 02333140 02333141 02333142 Estate Series Of Seacliff I \F' Pe lea I P PENLP�Sf�LA 18012 Caw-an #200 520 Br �adw�a S1ai #10 ��520�BADWAh SUI #100 Irvine,C�a 92714 Sian\ I Monica,�*i 90401 SN'A MONICA, A 90401 - 02333143 02333144 02333145 PENINS I P PENIIyS'ULA �� I\ P PE U�90401 520 AY IT n100 520 BROADWAY SQITE�]nOO 5 0 AD A SANTA MONICA, C 96401 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 SANTA MONI �� n r�.r_-_r;r.�r_. -c: ,_�rti r_-�r�r�:_�r :::� r •.v r.:. _._: .. . .. - -- ------ - - F'RESS FiETLJRN TO CONTINUE \AF 4 02318123 02318125 Co• Homes H�►ntington Beach Co HUNTINGTON BEACH CO 74&11 \ � 225 Bush St P 0 BOX 7611 n isco,C\Q 94190 Sian Fr�ancisco,C,a 941'20 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 _ 02�4134 Hunt ngton Be• ch C 2.25 EN sh St -an Fri cis cv,Ca 94120�- ` . . . — 02338167 02338168 Elizabeth K Alton Edward F & Doroth Davison 19271 Seabrook Cir 19265 Seabrook Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Hntgtn Bch CA 92648 7� —` 02338169 02338170 02338171 Kathleen A Chapman Alex P & Joann Puvlin L L Hamilton 19261 SeubrooK 19255 SeubrooK 19251 Seabrook Ln _ Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 ^ - . . ~ 02337157 02337158 02337159 Guyette Honeymun Seuchump Partners Eugene N 8 Barbara Smith 19301 Champion Ln 7540 Scout Ave 19311 Champion Ln . Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92646 Bell Gurdens,Cu 90201 Hntgtn Bch CA 92648 - r*�*�ABELS - -- _--_- PRINTED - ` 02337178 02337179 02337180 Richard & Ilse Foster Millard G & Mary Shirley Richard H & Dolore Benedix 19322 Archfield Cir 19316 *rchfield Cir 19312 Archfield Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch , Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 02337181 James S & Sigrid Williams 19302 hrchfield Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 L -ELc � ' 4 L�B2 PRIN7���' � ---- -- -------- Armon W & Jucqueli Kullun G B & Anna Jones George J Amen ' . 19234 Seabrook Ln 19256 Seabrook Ln 19262 Seabrook Ln ' Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92647 .-- -'—� '- '� ' --- - -- - 02338122 02338123 02338124 Joseph J Mc Glinchey Robert N & Guldys HopKins George S & Melodee Rea 19266 Seabrook Ln 19272 Seabrook Lune 19276 Seabrook Ln Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92647 Hntgtn Bch CA 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 --' --' i' / * S C >14 —~AnB fn/_!u ` --' O2338145 02338146 02338147 Ralph A & Sarah Ward Currie C Kulp Douglas G ClurK 19285 Meudowood Cir 19281 Meudowood Cir 19275 Meudowood Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 ' 02338148 02338149 02338150 J G Kenefick Michael W Griggs John D & Dianne Bernard 19271 Meudowood Cir 19265 Meudowood Cir 19261 Meudowood Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 _--_ - , -- 02338151 02338152 02338153 Gory F Shurter Jolyn A Turner Beryl F Olic 19256 Meodowood Cir 19262 Meadow Wood Cir 19266 Meudowood Cir ntgtn Bch CA 92649 Hntgtn Bch CA 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 02338154 02338155 02338156 Douglas C & Nancy Haines Louis T & Marion Gaeta Thomas & Connie Carey 19272 Meudowood Cir 19276 Meudowood Cir 19282 Meudowood Cir Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 Huntington Beuch ,Cu 92648 ` ' --~ - 02338172 02338173 02338174 Clu Ser Of Seacliff Estates Seacliff Club Series Of Seacliffho b Si. versp r U 2110 Main St 50 e s 'olling Hills Esta ✓ a 90274 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Rolling Hills Estate;Ca 90274 02336175 02338176 02338177 Club Series ;'eaclif o CLUB SERIES OF SEACLIFF C� SE ,0 SEA LIFF Si rspur R 608 SILVERSPUR RD 608TYLVERSPUR RD Rolling Hills Estate,Ca ID274 ROLLING HILLS ESTATE, CA ROLLING HILLS ESTATE, CA 02338180 02338182 02338183 ' 4B SERIES OF SEACLIFF CLUB SLR-�ES OF SEACLIFF CLUB SE&�E��SEA FF % 608�SILVERSPUR RD �_� 608�STLVERSPUR R G HILL�ESTATE, CA DOLLING HILLTESTTA S, CA\. _j ROLLING HILLS ESTATE, CA 02339101 02339102 02339103 Henry J & Betsy Nametz William J & Claire Ross Dayid I► & Christin Gilrain 19211 SeabrooK Ln 19213 SeabrooK Ln 19215 SeabrooK Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92647 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02339104 02339105 02339106 Philip R & Sylvia Collins Thomas Pfeiffer Shirley Lutgen 19217 SeabrooK Ln 19219 SeabrooK Ln 19221 SeabrooK Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92647 Huntng Bch ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 2339107 02339108 02339109 Willis A & Carol Koffroth James B & Gail Scott Samuel. S Pievac 19223 SeabrooK Ln 19225 SeabrooK Ln 19227 Seabrook Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02339110 02339111 02339112 Dale A & Karen Schneider Uavid M & Brenda Burch John C Reynolds 19235 Coldstream Ln 19241 Coldstream Ln 19245 Coldstream Ln _ Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 -- 02339113 John R & Susanne Inuits '19251 Coldstream Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02333146 02§147 02333148 I " P'NIN L Est�ite Ser" s Of Sac 1 Pf LSTATE R S OF SE CLIFF 52 BRO WAY UITE r1.00 1801 Caw,an - - 00 18O1 COWAN ' 00/ SAN ONICA, A 90401 I rvix-rCa 92714 INSE, CA 92714 02337101 02337102 02337103 John F & Dyna SzymansKi Albert W De LormKi Lawrence W 8 Sand Davidson 19261 Archfield Cir 19263 Archfield Cir 19265 Archfield Cir Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02337104 02337105 02337106 arel D Porter Brian J & Deborah Hoyt Louis D & Gloria Barberi *9267 Archfield Cir 19269 Archfield Cir 6471 Crowley Ave, Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Ventura,Ca 93003 02337107 02337106 02337109 Walter L & Marlene Thorson Edward P Smith Kathleen K NaKase 19275 Archfield Ln 19277 Archfield Cir 19279 Archfield Cir Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington B.each ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02337110 02337111 02337112 Mohammad H & Moma BonaKdar Robert F & Uoroth Thompson Ernest J & Ann De La Motte 19281 Archfield Cir 19285 Archfield Cir 19291 Archfield Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 2337113 02337114 Russell B Haydon Cynthia M Stanley 19295 Archfield Cir 19301 Archfield Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Hntgtn Bch CA 92648 *** BEL ' LETED �c* 14 El-- ' F' -E "02337150 02337151 02337152 James K White John F' & Chal Stephens Darryl M Sharon Taylor '19286 Champion 19282 Champion Ln 19276 Champion Ln Huntington Wach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntng Bch ,Ca 92648 1, 11020022 Hunting to era h Co �''\ 611 Sian Francisco,L"/94120 11020031 H n t i n c R e•a ch,�Fv\v F' O 76. 1 Sian Fr�ancis� ,C�a 94120 11023002 11023005 11023007 Signal Companies Inc PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO City Of Huntington Reach 17890 SKY P a rK C i r P O BOX 2099 2000 Gila i n St Irvine,Co 92714 HOUSTON, TX 77252 Huntington Reach ,C-a 92648 11023009 11023010 Pacific Coast Homes Hyrnt7 n g tcany e�ac Co 11023011 2120 Main St Ste 260 /225 R�►s,%St HUNTINGTON BEAC 0�� Huntington Reach ,Ca 92648 Sian Francisco,C-a, 94120 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 :.LS C 'LET 11 5 _.ARELS FRLNTED 02318114 02318123 02318125 Pacific Coast Homes Huntin Reach e—� HUNZIN�ON BEAC P o>: 761 22G ush S �4 BOX ul San Fr sco,C�a 944?� Sian Fr�ancisco,C�a 94120 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 02318134 Hunt ' on Re• Co ; j Bush St ��— San Francisco,Ca 94120 02333101 02333102 02333103 Pham Co D L&They T L Bui Larry & Maria Enneman Faustino M & Consuelo Gayo 19185 Woodlands Ln 19191 Woodlands Ln 19195 Woodlands Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02333104 02333105 02333106 1 G & Clore Farley Jer M Yu Iiror & Uorit Benjamin 19205 Woodlands Ln 19215 Woodlands Ln 19225 Woodlands Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02333107 02333108 02333109 Harold P & Beverly Long Curtis C & Ruth Chen Donald L Kester . 19235 Woodlands Ln 19245 Woodlands Ln 19255 Woodlands Ln Huntington ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92647 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02333119 02333120 02333124 G H & Corazan Oca David S Mier Chetta E & Patrici Jira 6162 Gleneagles Cir 6172 Gleneagles Cir 6181 Gleneagles Cir Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 r2333125 02333126 02333127 Brian E & Linda Boyer Melvin G & Nagel HoshiKo I P Peninsula 6171 Gleneagles Cir 6161 Gleneagles Cir 520 Broadway Suite 0100 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Santa Monica,Ca 90401 02333128 02333129 02333130 F' F'e i sul�a �� I P PENINSULA I� P 1090TRI A 5� oad ay SA \ # O 520 BROADWAY SUITE #100 5z�0 �SUIT%9#� Santa Monic a 90�1 SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 SANTJ MONK , CA 02333131 (323331 I P P NSULA 0I2P3PEN2 ULA � IMP PEriV3IN'ULA 20 ROA AY IT tt100 526\BRO�AD Y SUITE 1 0 520� B�tOADW Y SU TE "1� S T MO NI CA 9 N SANTA-BIONIC 90401 SANTV MONI A 9001 02337185 02337186 �; ;� 1-07189 CLUB�SERIES-O tiSEACLIFF Club Series Of Seacliffho- CLUB.—SERIES OFY EACLI5F HOMES 608 §�L.Xt SPUR`RD PS M 608 Silver Spur Rd 4230 16-09 SILVER SPUR RD 1230 ' ROLLING HILLS ES , CA Rolling Hills Estates,Ca 90274 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA V 02337193 CLUB SERIES EACLIFF 08 ILVER PUR 'RD §301 ROLLI STATES, C 02338101 02338102 02338103 enneth E & Marie Rawald Donald F & Dorot Guillaume Robert C & Dolores Terry 19245 Meadowood Cir 19243 Meadowood Cir 19241 Meadowood Cir Huntington Beach ,Ca 92647 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02338104 02338105 02338106 James F & Barbara Reed FranK E Medina John P & Judylin Watt 19239 Meadowood Cir 19237 Meadowood Cir 19245 SeabrooK C i r Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 02338107 02338108 02338109 Richard S Bliss William B & Rut Bruffey FranK C & Jean Lopez 19243 SeabrooK Ln 19241 SeabrooK Ln 19239 Sea BrooK Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 2338110 02338111 02338112 JacK A & Sarah Lawrence Sue Bosse Roger A & Ardella Coult 19237 SeabrooK 19235 SeabrooK Ln 19233 SeabrooK Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92647 02338113 02338114 02338115 Paul E & Patricia Brown Robert J Heit haws Albert C Q Patric Guidotti 19231 SeabrooK Ln 19229 SeabrooK Ln 19226 SeabrooK Ln _ Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 -,02338116 02338117 02338118 Agizy M & Nabila El Fred M & Gloria Mc Bride Edward H & Mwga Miettinen 19228 SeabrooK Ln 19230 Seabrook Ln 19232 SeabrooK Ln Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Huntington Beach ,Ca 92648 Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach _ Office of the City Clerk ",.".� ...^--.•�.-.•-_n...-.,r.,.- e� r, = _ P. O. Box 190 C Q � Huntington Beach, CA 92648 +`'�'•+1� d r' '7 n 02337108 '' Edword P Sri, 19277 Ar•chfiej1� C:�`r =.= :.�.� Huntington Be 649 Lin FIRST CLASS MAIL N11h11NCTON SI.ACH `... ` • li:I,:::I�l:il:::l:,il;�I:�RI�Il�1.�11�11:11�::111:1:,1 w. v-_�r+.vr.�-_• �.+��-a •c� rrn7,rn7:7r7f�i7-..at71��0�-�aa.e,,.T] au,a 01� SQ.:,uOTS9'CllI1130:1_..... .. Legal Notice -- — ----- ---= - City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 ..v. .». ..a..., .__ ,.�;'' _ >• Huntington Beach,CA 92648 tY _ 12 rya E a� 11023001 CJ ty (If Huntington F?e-ach 2000 drain St J Huntington BGiach i, Cla 9,,"648 • FIRST CLASS MAIL I IN IIN(.RIN SIACH - I I 11,I,!1111!►1 I l::I 11:i:!l l l:ll l:„1,111111,11 • 0 Legal Notice n�arJ( City of Huntington Beach $, Q_q Office of the City Clerk P. 0. Box 190 .. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Q fad c\ PRESOTI FIRST CLASS � �; e.., .... �, •mac. �i -;'•� � `_ ' , ]3.a I F3 r .V. w; Cl f S r.��a c:l.:i.f f h n = ,, G C lir Rd t2 30 Fo�13.7.in�ver Hil.ls Eat.�ater>YC%Ix `�0'�"I' 4 n � �. � FIRST CLASS MAIL ��� PLC- , : . .. r1 mir4CTON!EACH - uvLa.a_.�LPAL4 v..J - Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk q.- T(Jq f--UN - - - P. 0. Box 190 i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 O� NG �fl F-i', �5- ::,,claim CHECKFC C B SERIES OF SEACLIFF.. . 608 SILVERSPUR RD ' known � ROLLING HILLS ESTATE, CA i.:. 0(t in stars FIRST CLASS MAIL 1 INIINCTON UACH Publish 5/10/90 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 (Establish precise alignment for Seapoint Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, May 21, 1990, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4/ Coastal' Development Permit No . 89-46/Negative Declaration No. 89-63 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Precise plan of Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street (see map) . ZONE: Various zoning districts (Industrial/Residential/ Recreation/Open Space) . REOUEST: Approve precise plan of street alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No . 89-63 . COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below) PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE: (1) Staff Report; (2) Public Hearing; (3) Planning Commission Discussion; and (4) Planning Commission action. This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed to the California Coastal Commission by an aggrieved party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrived. i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) i An aggrieved person may file an appeal within ten (10) working days, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources Code, in writing to : California Coastal Commission 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380 POB 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City Council Action. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public . A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after May 18, 1990 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (5339d-6, 7) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Dated: May 8, 1990 I i 1RA-01-CZ i +I 1 3 as o = GAR FI L -- -- — - — cc-cz-//' _ -o-CZ R4-0 ROS-0` °.rr._ :> - �• ,p'�;`� s,�p &`b .,.oxea�nea��o:�- � .�f�`y�1`°.b-�i�„-.,e�am ,-:C aE'mo'*t,,:;.•�'b.",'S:'.:�' :�`C,�.)',, L[v;�•;'�::smc4a�c�it:ao"p-,c-ti•,�. Y'a' •o-e4.` ° o~;:e.S'`%�PA'Vi��a%-'S`Y�•1<.+,'Q•�.'";•�.'=':��X_ . .;.�S t'�• ate— � --' :C G. R4-29-0-CZ R O R4-01 . RI-01 .. 0 9s :� :•?`•w�!�°-=-•t., �. ter. 5 •_1 `'� _,-__ _ a: ` 3-17-0 ROS-0� ` i q2•p .00` p p ✓ C' l 4 y �. - 1 R2PD-0_CZ - "�R4-Q s R2-PD-0-CZ_ c eRZ-PO-p-CZ "\ .ys:^'`itii,•: PPSA89-04/CDP89-46/ND89-63 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION NOTICE T0: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: THE OFFICE OF .THE CITY CLERK THE AP LISTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR NOTIFICATION MAILINGS BY THE CITY CLERK MUST BE THE LATEST'AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE- WITH DIVISION THBOC REOUIREMENTS. *** ***PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE LIST MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE THE MAILING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WAS SENT. DATE L/(/ IINATURE VERIFYING A E UACY OF LIST — 8 DU.7v REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION July 16, 1990 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrato RTq M� Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community DevelopmentF�%r Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/COASTAL c _ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION N� 89-63 Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Ex c�n c�ion � _ � ;,., _ -z Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachme Rff: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: - Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 which will establish the precise alignment for Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street. Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 addresses coastal act concerns and Negative Declaration No. 89-63 addresses the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION• Motion to "Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-63, Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 and adopt Ordinance No. 3045 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 . " ANALYSIS• At the May 21, 1990 City Council meeting, a number of concerns were expressed on the alignment of Seapointe Avenue and its intersection with an extension of Garfield Avenue. Improvements to Seapointe Avenue must be completed prior to occupancy of the housing units, "The Estates" presently under construction. First occupancy of these units is anticipated for the end of July, 1990 or beginning of August, 1990 . Pending the outcome of City Council action on this Precise Plan of Street Alignment, staff will be prepared to recommend to the Planning Commission that this condition be amended to allow a limited occupancy of the tract during road construction. Staff is proposing that no more than 74 units be occupied prior to completion PI O 5/85 of Seapointe Avenue, approximately March, 1991. Another recommendation by staff is that all residents moving into the dwellings prior to completion of Seapointe Avenue be notified of the difference in emergency response times. In addition, staff would recommend that no additional construction starts be permitted in the remainder of 'this tract until such time as the road is completed. The original condition was placed upon the project in an effort to assure •,adequate delivery of emergency services to this portion of the City. Attached are memorandums from the Fire/Police Chiefs detailing their concerns . Discussion concerning a temporary street alignment would not be feasible in that it would not adequately satisfy the concerns of the Police and Fire Departments . This is due to the fact that any temporary improvements would have to be removed at the time of permanent road construction and therefore not provide an even larger number of future residents with the optimum emergency services . In addition, the developer requirements are for the construction of only one road and not two; therefore, the additional road construction cost would be borne by the City. The argument that this alignment is based upon a conceptual proposal - for the cross-gap connector which may not be permitted for construction due to various federal regulations is valid. However, if a modification is required at some future time to the intersection of Garfield and Seapointe Avenue due to the lack of a cross-gap connector, then the additional asphalt in that area may be converted into a staging area or parking lot for the linear park. Another issue discussed by Council was concern over the potential loss of 2 . 7 acres of park land due to. the street being designed as a secondary arterial highway. " The projected traffic counts warrant this designation and therefore the street must be designed to those capacities and standards or else there would be potential for jeopardizing future highway funding with respect to other City projects. Staff recommends that this loss in acreage be made up within the conceptual boundaries of the linear park in one of the areas identified in the attached map. Staff will be prepared at the meeting to discuss these and other issues in greater detail . FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may direct staff to develop alternative Precise Plan Alignments and bring back such alternatives for review and discussion. RCA -2- (6400d) ATTACHMENTS• 1. Memorandum dated July 10, 1990 from Chief Lowenberg, Police Department 2 . Memorandum dated July 11, 1990 from Chief Picard, Fire Department 3 . Linear Park map with alternative acreage site. 4 . Request for Council Action dated 5/21/90 MTU:MA:ss RCA -3- (6400d) • RECEIVED J. &I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ; J la►_. 1 .- 1990 HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION TO: MIKE ADAMS FROM: R. E. LOWENBERG �� Director/Community Development Chief of Police SUBJECT: SEAPOINT CONNECTION DATE: JULY 10# 1990 The connection of Seapoint with both Garfield and Pacific Coast Highway is essential if we expect to continue to provide the quality of law enforcement service our community has come to expect and deserve. Police response time is not only critical to our success in the performance of our duties, but it is also a critical tool that the community` uses to measure the Police Department's efficiency and effectiveness. Overhead transparencies that I have completed illustrate the significant positive impact that the Seapoint connection and the Bolsa Chica cross gap connector have on our ability to respond to calls for service in a timely fashion. The construction of these two connectors would allow a unit positioned on Doral in RD328 to respond to any location in the city within a maximum of ten (10) minutes. The downtown area and a large section of the central portion of the city could be reached by this same unit within five (5) minutes. The ability to respond within five ' (5) , seven and a half (7 1/2) , and ten (10) minute time constraints is greatly reduced without these connectors. Ten (10) minute response times can be expected from responding units as close as one quarter mile from the location of the call because of limited street access. At the present time the only access to the Seapoint development is from Goldenwest and Palm. Not only does this create a problem from the standpoint of distance and general police response, but an additional concern with regard to ingress and egress were there to be a major disaster incident requiring evacuation. Overall public safety can be greatly impacted by the extension of Seapoint; and I, therefore, strongly support its approval. REL/EJM0132/mcm g CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Mike Adams From Raymond C. Pic Director of Community Development Fire Chief Subject GARFIELD/SEAPOINT CONNECTION Date July 11, 1990 The Garfield/Seapoint extension is a vital part of the fire defense and emergency medical system for the City of Huntington Beach. This extension is also an established component of the City's General Plan upon which the Fire Department has based all strategic planning and capital improvement efforts. Any deviation from the General Plan would severely and negatively impact all of the City's emergency services, i.e. fire, police, and medical. The specific importance of the Garfield/Seapoint is that it represents an improvement of approximately two (2) minutes (1.94 actual) in response time and a travel distance savings of approximately six (6) tenths (.59 actual) of a mile. This improvement in response time is significant, but will still not meet the City's protection level required of a response time of five (5) minutes 80% of the time. The response time derived for this area with the Garfield/Seapoint connector will be 5.71 minutes with a travel distance of 2.3 miles versus the existing 7.65 minutes at a distance of 2.89 miles. RCP/sr 0500f RECEIVED J U L 1 11990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 70 Vq�� . FW6 �.4 Pic' NWYr- L REQUE ' FOR CITY COUNC1 ACTION g, ,, Qo }001 May 21, 1990 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Development k Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 Consistent with Council Policy? [V Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Mz) o yS Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-.4 which will establish the pr'ecise alignment for Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . Coastal Development Permit No . 89-46 addresses coastal act concerns and Negative Declaration No . 89-63 addresses the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act . RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Action on May 1, 1990 : ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES : ORGEGA, LEIPZIG ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46 BASED UPON FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES : ORTEGA, LEIPZIG ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE (See Attachment No. 2 for Findings and Conditions of Approval) PIO 5/85 ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 1430 APPROVING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 BASED UPON FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES : ORTEGA, LEIPZIG . ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No . 89-163 , approve Coastal Development Permit No . 89-46 and adopt Ordinance No . Z-� approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 . ANALYSIS : Seapoint Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to the western extension of Garfield Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial with a right-of-way width of 100 feet . Garfield Avenue is designated as a major arterial , east of Edwards Street, and a primary arterial west of Edwards Street . The proposed precise plan of street alignment for Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street are consistent with the City' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways . The City of Huntington Beach has initiated Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 in response to on-going and proposed development in the Seacliff area . Tentative Tract No . 13527, a request to construct a 158 unit residential subdivision, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 18 , 1989 . The following condition was imposed on Tentative Tract No . 13527 : Seapoint Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall be open to the public prior to occupancy of the first unit . Design and width of the connection shall be subject to review and approval by Public Works , Fire and Community Development departments and final approval by the Planning Commission. The general alignment of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue has been adopted by the City since 1976 and numerous reports and environmental impact reports (EIR ' s) for surrounding uses have included the future construction of both streets in traffic analysis sections . In 1980 , the Seacliff EIR included reference to the future alignment and construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues . The EIR for the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan and the more recent Holly-Seacliff EIR both identified and analyzed the future construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues as proposed in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 . The need for the Seapoint connection presently exists in order to provide both- emergency and non-emergency access to the existing Seacliff developments . . On May 1, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No . 1430 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 which establishes the right-of-way for Seapoint Avenue and an extension of RCA -2- (5706d) Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . As indicated in the May 1, 1990, Planning Commission staff report, the proposed alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue are consistent with both the City and County Master Plans for arterial streets and highways . In addition, according to the City Traffic Engineer, the proposed alignment has been used in numerous traffic studies and Environmental Impact Reports over the past 10 years . The following is a summary of the proposed alignment and the Bolsa Chica Linear Park planning . Precise Planning of Seapoint Avenue has involved establishing legal descriptions for the alignments of the unconstructed ends of Seapoint Avenue. At the western end, (between Palm and Pacific Coast Highway) the alignment is dictated by the location of an existing 100 foot wide oil lease easement through the Shell Oil production area . Previous Linear Park plans only generally located that easement . A legal description of that easement has resulted in a minor shifting of Seapoint Avenue northward in that area from the alignment shown on Linear Park Plans . The park acreage lost at that point is negligible and staff does not see any alternative alignment as being feasible. Linear Park planning efforts to date have been conceptual in nature, and have not proposed boundaries so specific in location as to be defined by legal descriptions . Rather, boundaries have been generally defined by existing topographic lines , and existing and conceptually proposed street locations . In the area south of Garfield Avenue, the eastern park boundary has been established by the existing constructed portion of Seapoint Avenue (from Palm Avenue north part way to Garfield Avenue) and by assumptions regarding how Seapoint will be aligned in the area where it is not yet constructed or precisely planned. These assumptions were based upon general alignments depicted on the City and County Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . In summary, staff ' s position is that the proposed precise alignment of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues is the only feasible alignment, based upon engineering principles, existing land uses and existing easements . Further, the fact that the alignment causes 2 . 7 acres to be lost from the Linear Park in one area does not reduce the total size of the park from the 113 acres approved by the Planning Commission, nor does it change the basic concept approved for configuration of the park. Rather, as park planning proceeds , a variety of engineering refinements will be made which will more precisely define the park boundary within the basic parameters of a 113 acre park size and the proposed park configuration. Also, replacement of the 2 . 7 acres lost to Seapoint will most likely be made up in the desirable bluff and swale areas north of Garfield Avenue . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the -department posted draft Negative Declaration No . 89-63 for thirty days . On January 31, 1990, the Environmental Review Committee, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a Mitigated RCA -3- (5706d) i Negative Declaration be approved with special studies which include an archaeological study of ORA-366 . Prior to any action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 , it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 89-63 . Staff has received comments from the Environmental Board in a letter dated April 27, 1990 (see Attachment No . 4) . In summary, the environmental board recommends that the proposed alignment be approved with a finding that the proposed alignment shall result in no net loss of park acreage . FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may modify Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 as desired . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map . 2 . Findings and Conditions of Approval . 3 . Planning Commission staff report dated May 1, 1990 . 4 . Environmental Board letter dated April 27, 1990 . 5 . Amigos de Bolsa Chica letter dated May 1, 1990 . 6 . Archgological Report dated March 23 , 1990 . 7 . Ordinance No . 3045 MTU:MA:RLF: kjl RCA -4- (5706d) 1 %� RA 01—CZ � F! L 5 e9'ai GAR 0]-E _� _ _ Y-O-CZ IM2-0-CZ 1� / R4-0 :iV.. CI-0 ROS-0 q'a' .. �CC•CZ •a•:•c :,Go�.rl sGooa '-o� a it ,Gt I.1I'''__—von--1� -•/ i` >.p• ph` C.%j.,..,,` ��,i_ t _� n , r •c �: � 1 ,'b ^°. �• o ��� ,,, -' !ems�-.o.��' ,roo-( RO5_U-CZ .. '.,�o,r ,n �.+. -•r,` �. — _{ --,:o,_— ru: :'- a• '°'• >.� - :GLr• t •;�'•o •.i +` .`�'' •;` »�,rYR4-Cl,;r" ''�=- -^� o x� a-� a.xy `J.• �,,tM •r��Np �p R4-29-0-CZ 8:;: ;Fz: o �. r.:�( RO ''��• xxr aa,.• `•4R. !•:` ib 7: Y.::• o .. t,Lf .. _ _ R xaa:c�fc ese -� v:f•'"'op ' �'.9�K8RWK ..._.n , ��:�� ,Y, ,(�1� _ D�•�I,. ..ddj11(rb � ,Ol,'.tM' �.•,`�T� 4' :$CC+(K i ',�!`',pA. •aX s` - 'b •�� rxro�q,. R�-: •,�,, Z',: -- ,._.. y" ., � 9N' = ,� ..Rrnl '3-17-0-CZ N', J 4--0 ,.4 4_�R 01 g R2-PD-0-CZ R2-PD-0-CZI ,C "R2-P0-0-CZ PPSA89-04/CDP89-46/ND89-63 - - HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ;,.,•;a ATTACHMENT NO. 2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO, 89-4 : 1. Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Seapoint Avenue and the Garfield Avenue extension west of Edwards Street is consistent with the City' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and the Master Plan of Arterials for Orange County. 2 . The Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 will not adversely affect the City' s General Plan because it will allow the construction of arterial streets necessary to provide adequate circulation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 89-46 : 1. The proposed precise plan of street alignment conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element of the City' s General Plan. 2 . Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 is consistent with the Coastal Zone suffix and other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3 . Construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue will provide infrastructure in a manner which is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element Land Use Plan. 4 . The proposed alignment of Seapoint Avenue and western extension of Garfield Avenue conforms to the public access and public recreation policies contained in Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated received April 11, 1990, shall be the approved layout . 2 . Construction plans for the western extension of Garfield Avenue shall be limited to the right-of-way between Edwards Street and Seapoint Avenue. 3 . Prior to issuance of grading plans for the construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue: a. If required by the Department of Public Works, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the City' s Department of Public Works . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. c. A map indicating the location of all current and abandoned oil wells within the right-of-way shall be submitted to the Community Development and Fire Departments . All oil facilities within the boundaries of the designated right-of-way are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned and shall meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas. Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments . 4 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 5 . Energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. , high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties . 6 . An on-site qualified archaeologist shall monitor all initial grading and excavation activities . a. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall determine the appropriate course of action. b.- Should any human bone be encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097. 98 and 5097. 99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains . Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law SB 297. c. The northern portion of ORA-366 shall be fenced as specified in the archeological report FOR ORA 366 dated March 23, 1900 . 7. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall : a . Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures . b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -2- (5707d) 8 . During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. c. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) . d. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 9 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 10 . Prior to initiation of construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process . ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -3- (5707d) huntington beach department of community development STA F f E-PORIL TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE:._ May 1, 1990 SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 90. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 17,. 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) i APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach. I REQUEST: Precise plan of street alignment of Seapoint Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue LOCATION: Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street to the City boundary 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-63 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 and adopt Resolution No. 1430 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and reconw+end adoption to the City Council . 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: I . On April 17, 1990, by a vote of 6-0, the Planning Commission continued Precise Plan of Street Alignment; N0. 89-4 and directed staff to provide an analysis of alternativ alignments in context with Bolsa Chica Linear Park planning effo;ts and provide comments from the Environmental Review Board. 3 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-63 for thirty days. On January 31, 1990, the Environmental Review Committee, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be approved with special studies which include an archaeological study of ORA-366. Prior to any action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 89-63. A-F M-23C r $ .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission has requested clarification regarding how the proposed alignment of Seapoint came about, how it differs from alignments depicted on the Linear Park plan, how the alignment results in a reduction in park acreage -66d whether or not there are alternative alignments which can be cone :$9te4Z. • ; Linear Park planning efforts to date have been conceptual in nature, and have not proposed boundaries so specific in location as to be defined by legal descriptions. Rather, boundaries have been generally defined by existing topographic lines, and existing and conceptually proposed street locations. In the area south of Garfield Avenue, the eastern park boundary has been established by the existing constructed portion of Seapoint Avenue (from Palm Avenue north part way to Garfield Avenue) and by assumptions regarding how Seapoint will be aligned in the area where it is not yet constructed or precisely planned. These assumptions were based upon general alignments depicted on the City and County Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. Precise Planning of Seapoint Avenue has involved establishing legal descriptions for the alignments of the unconstructed ends of Seapoint Avenue. At the western end, (between Palm and Pacific Coast Highway) the alignment is dictated by the location of an existing 100 foot wide oil lease easement through the Shell Oil production area. Previous Linear Park plans only generally located that easement. A legal description of that easement has resulted in a minor shifting of Seapoint Avenue northward in that area from the alignment shown on Linear Park Plans. The park acreage lost at that point is negligible and staff does not see, any alternative alignment as being feasible. The primary shift in Seapoint Avenue, as opposed to that shown on earlier park plans, occurs on the northerly unconstructed link of the arterial. Seapoint Avenue presently is constructed only to a point approximately 2000 feet north of Palm Avenue. At that point, the construction terminus is framed between an existing gas plant and an existing oil island. The precise plan must then define the alignment of Seapoint Avenue from that set point to Garfield Avenue. Previous Linear Park planning efforts had assumed that Seapoint would curve eastward before it connected with Garfield Avenue. In order to maximize park area, curve radii of 800 feet were assumed. More recent engineering completed by the City Traffic Section, however, has determined that 800 foot radii are unsafe and undesirable for a Primary Arterial Highway. Current engineering standards would instead dictate a minimum 1000 foot radius. By increasing the radius of the eastward curves of Seapoint, the connection of Seapoint to Garfield Avenue is thus shifted approximately 100 feet westward from the location previously shown on park plans . This shifting of this segment of Seapoint has resulted in the elimination of 2 .7 acres of Linear Park area from that portion of the Linear Park. Staff Report - 5/1/90 -2- (5598d) Given that the easement through the Shell Oil lease area at Pacific . Coast Highway dictates the southerly alignment of Seapoint, and that the minimum curve radii dictate the southern end of Seapoint, staff * does not see that alternative alignments are. feasible. If a completely different alignment of .Seapoint A s desired (such as curving Seapoint into Garfield Avenue ad 6"street) the appropriate vehicle for analysis would be a Circulation' Element Amendment rather than the subject Precise Plan of Street Alignment . In summary, staff ' s position is that the proposed precise alignment of Seapoint Avenue is the only feasible alignment, based upon engineering principles, existing land uses and existing easements. Further, the fact that the alignment causes 2.7 acres to be lost from the Linear Park in one area does not reduce the total size of the park from the 113 acres approved by the Planning Commission, nor does it change the basic concept approved for configuration of the park. Rather, as park planning proceeds, a variety of engineering refinements will be made which will more precisely define the park boundary within the basic parameters of a 113 acre park size and the proposed park configuation. Also, replacement of the 2.7 acres lost to Seapoint will most likely be made up in the desirable bluff and swale areas north of Garfield Avenue. The Planning Commission also directed staff to include comments from the Environmental Review Board. The Environmental Review Board will meet on Thursday, April 26, 1990 and comments will be distributed when available. 5 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 89-63, adopt Resolution No. 1430 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval and recommend adoption to the City Council . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO, 89-4 : 1 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Seapoint Avenue and the Garfield Avenue extension west of Edwards Street is consistent with the City's Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and the Master Plan of Arterials for Orange County. 2 .. The Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 will not adversely affect the City's General Plan because it will allow the construction of arterial streets necessary to provide adequate circulation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 89-46: 1 . The proposed precise plan of street alignment conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element of the City' s General Plan. 2 . Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 is consistent with the Coastal Zone suffix and other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Staff Report - 5/1/90 -3- (5598d) i 3 . Construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue will provide infrastructure in a manner which is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element Land Use Plan. 4 . The proposed alignment of Seapoint Avenue and western extension of Garfield Avenue conforms to the public access and public recreation policies contained in Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated received April 11, 1990, shall be the approved layout. 2 . Construction plans for the western extension of Garfield Avenue shall be limited to the right-of-way between Edwards Street and Seapoint Avenue. 3 . Prior to issuance of grading plans for the construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue: a. If required by the Department of Public Works, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . b. A grading plan shall be submitted to the City' s Department of Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. c. A map indicating the location of all current and abandoned oil wells within the right-of-way. shall be submitted to the Community Development and Fire Departments. All oil facilities within the boundaries of the designated right-of-way are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned and shall meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas . Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments. 4 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 5 . Energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g. , high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties. Staff Report - 5/l/90 -4- (5598d) 6. An on-site qualified archaeologist shall monitor all initial grading and excavation activities. a. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall c®a:ae- and the archaeologist shall determine the appropriate course of action. b. Should any human bone be encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097. 98 and 5097. 99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains. Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law SB 297: c. The northern portion of ORA-366 shall be fenced as specified in the archeological report FOR ORA 366 dated March 23, 1900. 7. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall: a . Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures . b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. . 8 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. b. Wet down areas in the. late morning and after work is completed for the day. c. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) . d. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 9 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 10. Prior to initiation of construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process . 10 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may modify Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 as desired. Staff Report - 5/1/90 -5- (5598d) ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Resolution No . 1430 2 . Staff report dated April 17, 19901, HS:RLF: jr Staff Report - 5/1/90 -6- (5598d) RESOLUTION NO. 1430 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 ALIGNING SEAPOINT AVENUE BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND GARFIELD AVENUE AND THE ALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF GARFIELD AVENUE WEST OF EDWARDS STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4; and The intent of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 is to provide adequate circulation and not to reduce the size of the minimum 113 acre Linear Park established by the Linear Park Advisory Committee, conceptually approved by the City Council on April 17, 1989 and approved by the City Planning Commission (Resolution No. 1415) on June 6, 1989; and The Planning Commission finds thatksaid Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 is necessary for the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly development of the community. NOW,. THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) marked Exhibit A, District Map 4 (Sectional District Map 4-6-11) marked Exhibit B, District Map 38 (Sectional District Map 34-5-11) marked Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is hereby amended to include Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4, to implement the precise alignment of Seapoint Avenue between Pacific Coast Highway and Garfield Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street. SECTION 2 . The real property designated as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 is more particularly described in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3 . To approve Resolution No. 1430 and recommend adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning 'Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the seventeenth day of April, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mike Adams, Secretary Geri Ortega, Chairwoman (5438d-8) i (5438d) huntington beach departmen'Hof community development STA f f EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: April 17, 1990 SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE. DECLARATION NO. 89-63 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: Precise plan of street alignment of Seapoint Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue. LOCATION: Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street to the City boundary. 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Negative Declaration No. 89-63 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 and adopt Resolution No. 1430 approving. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and recommend adoption to the City Council . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: The City Council adopted the Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways on March 22, 1976, which established the general alignment of Seapoint Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . On January 8, 1990, the City Council adopted the Holly-Seacliff General Plan Amendment which reaffirmed the alignment of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 is consistent with the adopted City of Huntington Beach Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and the recent Circulation Amendment associated with the Holly-Seacliff Master Plan. 3 :0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department posted draft Negative Declaration No . 89-63 for thirty days, and no comments either verbal or written were received. On January 31, 1990, Environmental Review Committee, in its . initial study of the project, has recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be approved with special studies which include ARAELA A-FM-23C an archaeological study of ORA-366 . Prior to any action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 89-63 . 4 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: The proposed project is located within the coastal zone of the City of Huntington Beach. Prior to any action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 the Planning Commission must approve Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 . 5 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 7 .0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 8 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: General Information: Seapoint Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to the western extension of Garfield Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial with a right-of-way width of 100 feet. Garfield Avenue is designated as a major arterial, east of Edwards Street, and a primary arterial west of Edwards Street. The proposed precise plan of street alignment for Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street are consistent with the City' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways . The City of Huntington Beach has initiated Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 in response to on-going and proposed development in the Seacliff area. Tentative Tract No. 13527, a request to construct a 158 unit residential subdivision, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 18, 1989 . The following condition was imposed on Tentative Tract No. 13527 : 3 . Seapoint Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall be open to the public prior to occupancy of the first unit . Design and width of the connection shall be subject to review and approval by Public Works, Fire and Community Development departments and final approval by the Planning Commission. The subdivider of Tentative Tract No. 13527 submitted a full set of street improvement plans for the northeast portion of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street in September of 1989 . The Traffic Engineering section of Public Works reviewed the plans and required greater curves in Seapoint Avenue. In January of 1990, the Public Works Department approved the proposed alignment . Concurrent review by the Planning staff required the precise plan of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . Staff Report - 4/17/90 -2- (5438d) On November 1, 1989, Pacific Coast Homes submitted Tentative Tract Nos . 14134 and 14135 located at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Seapoint Avenue. Tentative Tract No. 14134 is a request to construct 115 townhouses . Tentative Tract No. 14135 is a request to construct 216 stacked condominiums . This represents a major development request in the Seacliff area. On •November 16, 1989 , the Environmental Review Committee determined that a mitigated negative declaration should be approved for Tentative Tract Nos . 14134 and 14135 with the requirement to precise plan and construct Seapoint Avenue and connect Garfield Avenue to Edwards Street. In order for Tentative Tract Nos. 14134 and 14135 : to be processed, Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street must be precisely planned and constructed in order to provide adequate circulation for residents and to improve emergency response time. Currently, emergency response time is inadequate in the Seacliff area and additional development will require better access . . Linear Park Boundary: The proposed alignment generally conforms to the conceptual boundary of the proposed Bolsa Chica Linear Park. The precise alignment, however, will represent a 2.7 acre loss of estimated park acreage due to the precise engineering of the intersection of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues . On April 11, 1990, the County Planner for the Linear Park informed Ci y staff that they do not want any net loss of estimated linear park acreage. Staff concurs since the . conceptual boundary and estimated linear park acreage have been approved by the City Planning Commission and reviewed by the City Council . Any reduction in acreage will require a complete review cycle before the City Planning Commission and City Council . Staff recommends that the City continue to adhere to the concept of a 113 acre Linear Park. Any acreage lost through the development of the Se.apoint alignment, or other projects in the vicinity, will need to be made-up elsewhere within the Linear Park system. Since the Linear Park boundary is still only conceptual in nature, this should not be problematic from a planning standpoint. The Huntington Beach Company is the major holder of property in and around the proposed Linear Park and they will ultimately be required to replace the lost park acreage in order to retain a 113 acre park. Archaeological Study: A professional archaeologist is currently conducting a thorough study of ORA-366 which will be directly impacted by the Seapoint Avenue alignment . Prior to issuance of grading plans for street construction, staff will evaluate the results of the study and determine if further field analysis will be required. A preliminary report from the archaeologist doing the field work has indicated that ORA-366 has been severely disturbed in the area in which Seapoint Avenue is being proposed. It is anticipated that significant artifacts will be limited to shell and possibly some cultural items . Staff Report - 4/17/90 -3- (5438d) Cross-Gap Connector: The Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 extends Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street in anticipation of the future construction of the Bolsa Chica Cross-Gap Connector to Bolsa Chica Street . Recent discussions with the traffic engineers for Signal Landmark indicate that there is a minor discrepancy between the City' s alignment of Garfield Avenue and the County' s alignment . When and if the Cross-Gap Connector is approved, precise planning will ensure that both segments will align satisfactorily. As a condition of this project, construction of Garfield Avenue west of Seapoint Avenue will be postponed until the Cross-Gap Connector issue has been resolved. Summary: The general alignment of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue has been adopted by the City since 1976 and numerous reports and environmental impact reports (EIR' s) for surrounding uses have included the future construction of both streets in traffic analysis sections . In 1980, the Seacliff EIR included reference to the future alignment and construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues . The EIR for the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan and the more recent Holly-Seacliff EIR both identified and analyzed the future construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues as proposed in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 . The need for the Seapoint connection presently exists in order to provide both emergency and non-emergency access to the existing Seacliff developments . Although the City has initiated Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 in response to on-going and proposed development, the alignment does impact other unresolved issues . The precise plan impacts the conceptual acreage of the proposed Linear Park by decreasing the ovgrall acreage by 2 . 7 acres . This concern can be mitigated through alcommitment by "the City to retain a 113 acre Linear Park. It will be up to the Huntington Beach Company to provide additional park acreage. Also, the alignment of Garfield Avenue anticipates the construction of the Cross-Gap Connector which has not yet been approved by the County or the Coastal Commission. All traffic studies to date, however, have reaffirmed the need for the Cross-Gap Connector, even if the Bolsa Chica area is never developed. With these issues in mind,_ staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and forward to the City Council for adoption based 'on findings that the proposed alignment are consistent with the City and County Master Plan for Arterial Streets and Highways . 9 .0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 89-63 , adopt Resolution No . 1430 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and Coastal Development Permit No . 89-46 with findings and conditions of approval and recommend adoption to the City Council . Staff Report - 4/17/90 -4- (5438d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO, 89-4 : 1. Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Seapoint Avenue and the Garfield Avenue extension west of Edwards Street is .consistent with the City' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and the Master Plan of Arterials for Orange County. 2. . The Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 will not adversely affect the City' s General Plan because it will allow the construction of arterial streets necessary to provide adequate circulation. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 89-46: 1. The proposed precise plan of street alignment conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element of the City' s General Plan. 2 . Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 is consistent with the Coastal Zone suffic and other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 3 . Construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue will provide infrastructure in a manner which is consistent with stheHuntington Beach Coastal Element Land Use Plan. 4 . The proposed alignment of Seapoint Avenue and western extension of Garfield Avenue conforms to the public access and public recreation policies contained in Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The site plan dated received April 11, 1990, shall be the approved layout . 2 . Construction plans for the western extension of Garfield Avenue shall be limited to the right-of-way between Edwards Street and Seapoint Avenue. 3 . Prior to issuance of grading plans for the construction of Seapoint Avenue and the western extension of Garfield Avenue: a . A qualified archaeologist shall perform a detailed field investigation. The investigation shall include an overall survey, post hole studies where necessary and scraping shall be done if the archaeologist deems it necessary. Upon completion, the archaeologist shall submit a report to the Planning Division including but not limited to a summary of cultural artifacts and maps indicating location of survey areas . Staff Report - 4/17/90 -5- (5438d) b. If required by the Department of Public Works, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. -This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities . c. A grading plan shall be submitted to the City' s Department of Public Works . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. d. A map indicating the location of all current and abandoned oil wells within the right-of-way shall be submitted to the Community Development and Fire Departments. All oil facilities within the boundaries of the designated right-of-way are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned and shall meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas . Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments . • � i e. The developer of Tentative Tract Nos . 13527, 14134 and 14135 shall provide a letter of agreement to provide additional acreage in order to mitigate any loss to the estimated linear park acreage of 113 acres . 4 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. 5 . Energy efficient lamps shall be used (e.g . , high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All outside lighting shall be directed t•o prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties . 6 . An on-site qualified archaeologist shall monitor all initial grading and excavation activities . a . Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall determine the appropriate course of action. b. Should any human bone be. encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097 . 98 and 5097 . 99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains . Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law SB 297 . • j� • 1 Staff Report - 4/17/90 -6- (5438d) 7 . During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall : a . Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures . b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. 8 . During construction, the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. c. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) . d. Discontinue construction during second stage. .smog alerts. 9 . Construction shall be limited to Monday —Saturday 7: 00 AM to 8 :00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 10 . Prior to initiation of construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process . 10 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may modify Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 as desired. ATTACHMENTS: ; 1 . Area map 2 . Precise centerline alignment for. Seapoint Street and Garfield Avenue 3 . Street sections . 4 . Resolution No . 1430 5 . Negative Declaration No . 89-63 6 . Oil abandonment report 7 . City of Huntington Beach Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways 8 . Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways HS:RLF: kla Staff Report - 4/17/90 -7- (5438d) RA 01-CZ .� f x - bl 5 99-.1 O]-E cc-CZ - "����•aa((()//{///jay 1 -cz I rbb v y aLY.W i 3f6 .•..0' " PP° ROS-0 - — -- — aaoad arala=-a 4V�.Gt ;t� •``'`,�� cz c,o ._�a _r 1 :%,' '�.,\` '` � arar— d 14 y R4-29-0-CZ RA �` :fib F mv�' •iRO • •.. .usao'{ Y .:•� l°°S `as L`�� '�A`'QiII{ -,.Y--.rtr01 RO RZ- !!'' G "' SFF�:P�-• 'rVY-u-!1f `�'���'�q�Ao $'� ROSA R4-0_,I' R4-C 4-0 ZXCo:=1a' RZ+"-CZ 4*r ' R4-01 lo l R2-eD-0-CZ PPSA89-04/CDP89-46/ND89-63 %- HU"NCTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 1 w . ,.. 1 —. --- i •�, \.- `t. / )� � sl [ �%`��.�/ 4 � h� 11 � l. __� - _\\ :`• '. .;t •//(mot /A Y-/ 1�\ 1'( '41 / Z. 1�fi/6 544 Qy- _tit F /, .. M1 '.� - _ ' �� _ � i •��/ \ II� -.. cj a PARCEL' 4 1 -[rvrir -} �'< IF. -2"vIr _ \ - of t -[, ` ` 1` t S ) t - •`' 1}.f[) weezasrf `�� � - 11 '!q-G.llplpC ! .I ti-. � ` • w Nx ro. 0 trttr.r - I' ') • [ tta ,y w-mr[ , '`••�DD••j11 T �'"?/1 ,'� ). ! watt PARCEL 1 t, PARCEL 3 f l rq P.M.S. 166/iD-it =. f EXHIBIT \ PRECISE CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT < 1 FOR .GARFIELD AVENUE EDWARDS STREET TO WESTERLY CITY BOUNDARY SEAPOINT STREET ` A� )__Z�. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO GARFIELD AVENUE � J00 IW OOL.-tQ-I - _ J� ALDEN & /J ASSOCIATES um NNf 1=2 mek IImR M mvm" rt)++ rytq eto-ot+o uc eeo-twe ffam - 1m1 ' PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 89--4 TYPICAL SECT"Q1S R/W R/W 100, 2' 7' 11' 11' 12' 14' 12' 1 1 ' 11' 7' 1 2' GARFIELD STREET SECTION SEAPOINT TO EDWARDS R/W R/W 90` 8' 7' 12' 1 1' 14' 1 1 ' •12' 7' 8' GARFIELD STREET SECTION CItY BOUNDARY TO SEAPOINT R/W R/W 100, 8' 12' 11' 12' 1 L 12' 1 1' 12' 8' SEAPOINT STREET SECTION EXISTING TO GARFIELD R/W R/W 100, 8' 11' 11' L 12' L 16' 12' 11' 11' 8' SEAPOINT STREET SECTION EXISTING R/W R/W 100, '-1 13' 11' 11' 14' 11' 11 ' 13' '-1 ARIE ARIE SEAPOINT STREET SECTION PCH TO EXISTING REV. 04/11/90 03/30 A- RESOLUTION NO. 1430 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 ALIGNING SEAPOINT AVENUE BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY .AND GARFIELD AVENUE AND THE . + ALIGNMENT OF A PORTION OF GARFIELD AVENUE WEST OF EDWARDS STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4; and The Planning Commission finds that said Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 is necessary for the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly development of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, the 'Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) marked Exhibit A, District Map 4 (Sectional District Map 4-6-11) marked Exhibit B, District Map 38 . (Sectiona1 District Map 34-5-11) marked Exhibit -C attached hereto and incorporated herein by ..reference is hereby amended to include Precise Plan of -Street Alignment No . 89-4, to implement the precise alignment of Seapoint Avenue between Pacific Coast. Highway and Garfield Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue west of Edwars Street. SECTION 2 . The real property designated as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-4 is more particularly described in . Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3 . To approve Resolution No. 1430 and recommend adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, t California . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the seventeenth day of April, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: 11 NOES: O ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Mike Adams, Secretary Geri Ortega, Chairwoman (5438d-8) k CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Bob Franklin From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Associate Planner SECTION Subject ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Date March 12, 1990 FORM NO. 89-63/PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT No. 89-4 Applicant : City of Huntington Beach Request : Set alignment of Seapoint Street and Garfield Avenue. Location: Seapoint Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Garfield Avenue and Garfield Avenue from Edwards Street to the City boundary. Background Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project . In view of this, a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Daily Pilot for a thirty (30) day public review period commencing March 14 , 1990 and ending April 12, 1990 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 89-63 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . Mitigation Measures X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval . Rospectfully ub t Michael J nnor Planning Aide MJC: lab \ (5118d-2) ,� Notice of Comple in App- ,x F See NOTE below Mai!to:State Cle.ringhouse, Tenth Street,Sacramento,CA 95814 916/ 0613 SCH # Project Title: Seapoi /Ga -fi e1 d 51;l-.rpp-f- Al i crnmP_nt- Lead Agency: City of Huntington Beach Contact Person: Mike Connor 2000 Main Street Strcct.4ddress: Phone: ( 714) 9 6 0-8 8 2 6 City. Huntington Beach Zip: County:County: Orange - - - - - -- - -- ---- ----- -------- -------------- Project Location County: Orange City/Nearest Community:RID�-ton Be_a_ch Seapoint-Pacific Coast highway to Garfield Ave ntrt,lAcres: N1A_ Section Twp. __— Range: Base: _ Pacific..Ocean Will):n '_ \tiles: State Hwy 1;: Watcrways: Airports: 0 ---- Railways: 0 Schools: Document Type CEQA: ❑NOP ❑Supplement/Subscquent NEPA: ❑NOI Other: ❑Joint Document ❑Early Cons ❑EIR(Prior SCH No.) ❑EA ❑Final Document [�Nag Dec ❑Other ❑Draft EIS ❑Other ❑Draft EIR ❑FONSI - - - --------------------------------- Local Action Type ❑ General Plan Update ❑ Specific Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Annexation ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Master Plan ❑ Prczonc ❑ Redevelopment ❑ General Plan Element ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Use Permit ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Community Plan ❑ Site Plan ❑ Land Division (Subdivision, R Other Precise Plar Parcel Map,Tract Map,etc.) of Street Align. • - - - - - -- - --------------------------------- Development Type ❑ Residential: Units Acres ❑ Water Facilities: Type MGD ❑ Office: Sq.fr. Acres Employees ❑ Transportation:. Type ❑ Commercial:Sq.t. . Acres Employees ❑ Mining: Mineral ❑ Industrial: Sq ft. Acres Employees ❑ Powe(: Type Notts ❑ Educational ❑ Waste Treatment: Type ❑ Recreational ❑ Hazardous Waste:Type ❑ Other. - - - - - - - ------- --------------------------- Project Issues Discussed in Document ❑ Aesthetic(Visual ❑ Flood Plain/Rooding ❑ Schools/Universities ❑ Water Quality ❑ Agricultural Land ❑ Forest Land/Fire Hazard ❑ Septic Systems ❑ Water Supply/Groundwater M Air Quality 0 Geologic/Seismic ❑ Sewer Capacity ❑ Wetland/Riparian ❑ Archeological/Historical ❑ Minerals ® Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ❑ Wildlife �C] Coastal Zone [R Noise ❑ Solid Waste [$Growth Inducing �J Drainage/Absorption Q Population/Housing Balance ® Toxic/Hazardous [g Landusc ❑ Economic/Jobs 0 Public Services/Facilitics ® Traffic/Circulation ❑ Cumulative Effects ❑ Fiscal C25 Recreation/Parks ❑ Vegetation ❑ Other - - - - - -- - -------------------------- ------- Present Land Usel'Zoning/General Plan Use Adjacent Zoning : Medium-High Density Res- idential, High Density Residential and Industrial . General Plan Designation ili gli-J)o-n-s..i Ly-Re si de -a n-d-RQ s4a-L.G-e-•pr-04d-UQt_jG4:1 --- --- --- ----- Project Description precise Plan of Street Alignment for Seapoint Street and :Garfield Avenue across barren land used for resource production over the last seven decades . NOTE:Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects.If a SCH number already exists for a project(e.g.from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document)please fill it in. Revised Or.rober 1989 U LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development, Environmental Resources Section of the City of Huntington Beach that the following Draft Negative Declaration request has been prepared and will be submitted to the City Planning Commission for their consideration on May 8, 1990. The Draft Negative Declarations will be available for public review and comment for thirty (30) days commencing March 14, 1990. Draft Negative Declaration No. 89-63 in conjunction with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 is a proposal by the City of Huntington Beach to establish the alignment of Seapoint Street from Pacific Coast Highway to the extension of Garfield Avenue, which is being proposed to be extended from Edwards Street westward to the City boundary. Both streets are proposed as arterial highways and are shown on the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways in the City's General Plan. A copy of the request is on file with the Community Development Department, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on the request may do so in writing within 30 days of this notice by providing written comments to the Department of Community Development, Environmental Resources Section, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA 92648t (4SS2d) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) I. Background 1. Name of Proponent City of Huntington Beach 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 2000.Main Street. Huntington Beach. California 92683. (714) 536-5271 3. Date of Checklist Submitted _January 10, 1990 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Huntington Beach 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable Seavoint Street Alignment/Environmental Assessment No. 89-4/Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4/Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 6. Project Location II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are.required on attached sheets.) t Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Yes Maybe No g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? -t X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in.the quantity of ground waters, either through direct.additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X Environmental Checklist -2- (4462d) t U Yes Maybe No 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X v d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the t migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Environmental Checklist —3— (4462d) Yes Maybe No b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable naturalresource? X 10. Risk of Upset.. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,.but.not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X ° 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transport ati on/Cikulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X t b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor— tation systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circula— tion or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? . X b. Police protection? X Environmental Checklist —4— (4462d) Yes Maybe No c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental services? X IS. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial,amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist- ing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communicatidn systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?' X Environmental Checklist -5- (4462d) Yes Maybe No 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self sustain- ing levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, defini- tive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- desirable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental `effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Environmental. Checklist -6- (4462d) III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case X because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environs ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signatw For Community Development t Environmental Checklist —7— (4462d) DISCUSSION OF YES AND MAYBE ANSWERS SEAPOINT STREET ALIGNMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-63/ PPSA NO. 89-4/ COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.NO. 89-46 } Earth 1a. Some grading will be required in an area where numerous grading and excavation projects from oil and gas operations have been conducted over the last seven decades. No significant impacts are anticipated. lb. The proposed project would result in the overcovering of soil as well as grading about 50,000 cubic yards of earth with an eight foot cut and fill within an area that has been graded and altered numerous times over the last seven decades. No significant impacts are anticipated. lc. Some grading will be done (see lb) and will result in a change in topography, however, no significant impacts are anticipated. Ig. The proposed project lies within the Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone, however, the project does not involve the construction of habitable structures. No significant impacts are anticipated. Air .2a. The proposed project would accommodate approximately 30,000 vehicle trips per day at level of service "C". The proposed roadway is currently designated as a primary arterial on the City's General Plan and the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated from .implementing this designation. Water 3b. Surface runoff is expected to increase as a result of overcovering of the soil. All surface runoff will be accommodated by the City's storm drain system. No significant impacts are anticipated. Noise 6a. Noise levels are expected to increase due to approximately 30,000 vehicle trips per day along the road, however, by placing all residential development back from the street. and proper planning and construction measures, no significant impacts are anticipated. 6b. The existing residential developments along the eastern side of Seapoint may experience an increase in noise levels. However, since Seapoint is a designated arterial, the homes were designed to comply with City standards for residential noise. No significant impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist -8- (4462d) Light and Glare 7. Streetlights will increase the amount of lighting that currently exists. With. standard mitigation measures no significant impacts are anticipated. Land Use 8. The proposed project will facilitate future development on vacant land zoned for residential uses. However, no significant effects are anticipated since the areas are already zoned for residential uses. Risk of Upset 10a. There are several oil wells that have been or will be'abandoned within the proposed right of way. If these wells are examined to assure that they have all been abandoned to current code prior to acceptance, no significant impacts are anticipated: Population and Housing 11 & The project would facilitate the development of the vacant residential lands 12. surrounding it, in accordance with the City's adopted General Plan and Zoning. No significant effects are anticipated. Transport ation7Circulation r 13a. The project would facilitate approximately 30,000 vehicle trips per day at level of service "C". This is an acceptable level of service according to the Department of Public Works. C. The project would require a stop light at the intersectidn of Seapoint and Pacific Coast Highway where none currently exist. The stoplight•is considered as part of the City's Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways, therefore no significant effects are anticipated. d. The project will allow for more efficient circulation patterns for local and regional traffic. Public Services 14d. The establishment of the centerline and right of way will establish an eastern boundary to portions of the Linear Park which is in substantial conformance with the current conceptual park boundary. In addition, extension of Seapoint Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway would provide greater access to the beach and the Pacific Ocean. No significant impacts are anticipated. e. The extension of Seapoint Avenue will require additional maintenance responsibilities for City crews. These costs will be offset by new taxes from homes that can be constructed as a result of the new road. No significant impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist —9— (4462d) If all oil wells within the proposed right of way are not, or have not been, abandoned properly, the City could be responsible in the future for the cost of re—abandoning the wells which could be quite expensive. If all wells are inspected to assure proper abandonment and those that have not been abandoned to current code are improved prior to acceptance of dedication, no significant impacts are anticipated. Recreation 19. See 14d. Cultural Resources 20a, The project lies within an area considered to be archaeologically sensitive. The area has been generally studied and reports indicate that there is a very low likelihood of locating significant artifacts. Oil activities over the last seven decades have disturbed much of the sites integrity. The Environmental Review Committee has determined that an Archaeological survey will be sufficient. No significant effects are anticipated. DISCUSSION OF NO ANSWERS Earth Id. The area has been graded and barren for many years from the existing oil facility. No unique geologic or physical features exist. e. Soil erosion will be reduced as a result of paving and landscaping. t f. The proposed project does not run through or adjacent to any water bodies. Air 2b&c. Because of steady winds coming from the Pacific Ocean, one mile or less away, no objectionable odors from car emissions or change in air movements are expected. Water 3a, The project does not run through or adjacent to any body of water, does not lie C—i within the 100 year floodplain, will not affect the quality or quantity of water in any water body, will not affect the public water supply and would not be subject to tidal activity. Plant Life 4a. The site is presently barren land, therefore the landscaping on the sides and in the median would increase the number of species. All plant materials would be of species found readily available in the area. No agricultural uses are presently on this-site. Environmental Checklist —10— (4462d) Animal Life S. The site is presently barren. No animal life currently exists or is proposed for the area. Natural Resources 9a&b. The project comprises approximately 5,000 linear feet of street considering gas mileage of modern cars and the minimal distance of new roads, little new energy is expected to be used. .It is anticipated that this road would reduce vehicle miles traveled by providing a more direct line of travel for this part of the City. Risk of Upset. 10b. The proposed project would enhance emergency response and emergency evacuation plans. Transportation/Circulation 13b. All new developments will be required to provide off-street/on-site parking. e. The project does not intersect any railroads or come in contact with any harbors or airports. f. The street will be designeq for maximum safety. Public Services 14a The project would provide an alternate route of travel for police and fire &b. protection which could reduce response times. C. The construction of the road will not require additional school needs. Energy 15a The project comprises approximately 5,000 linear feet of street. Considering gas &b. mileage of modern cars and the minimal distance of new roads, little new energy is expected to be used. Utilities 16. Although the road will provide a place to install new utilities, the street itself will only require standard street lighting and drainage. Human Health 17. The new street will be designed for maximum, safety to ensure public health. Aesthetics 18. At present, the land is currently barren and views of the ocean are blocked by a ten foot block wall. The proposal would result in streetside landscaping and a view corridor to the Pacific Ocean. Environmental Checklist -I1- (4462d) Cultural Resources 20b, The project area possesses no buildings,.structures, objects, unique ethnic, c&d. cultural, religious or sacred uses. Mandatory Findings 21 The project does not appear to have the potential to substantially deplete the a-d. quality of the environment because the site is presently graded and.barren and by providing an alternate route of travel, could be beneficial to traffic circulation and automobile emissions. t Environmental Checklist -12- (4462d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MITIGATING MEASURES X 1. '* All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite facility equipped to handle them. X 2. .If lighting is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy.efficient lamps shall be used (e.g., high pressure sodium vapor, metal 'halide). All outside lighting shall be. directed to prevent "spillage"onto adjacent properties. X 3. If required by the Department of Public Works, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. This analysis shall include on—site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. V 4. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a grading plan shall be submitted to the City's Department of Public Works. A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project may be required by the Director of Public Works if deemed necessary. X 5. Should any abandoned oil wells or tanks be encountered, the Fire Department shall be notified and current standards met as required by Article 15 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Any abandonment of existing wells must be to current standards as well. 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits for street improvements a qualified archaeologist shall perform a detailed field investigation. The investigation shall include an overall survey, post hole studies where necessary and scraping shall be done if the archaeologist deems it necessary. Upon completion, the archaeologist shall submit a report to the Planning Division including but not limited to a summary of cultural artifacts and maps indicating location of survey areas. X 7. An on—site qualified archaeologist should monitor all initial grading and excavation activities. X 8. Should any cultural materials be encountered during the initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall determine the appropriate course of action. X 9. Should any. human bone be encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097.98 and 5097.99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains. Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law SB 297. X_ 10. During cleaning, grading, earth moving or excavation, the applicant shall : a. Control fugitive dust by regular watering, paving construction roads, or other dust preventive measures. b. Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. _v 1.1 . During construction, the applicant shall : a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to Prevent dust raised when leaving the site, b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day, c. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment, d. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts), e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. X 12. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. X 13. Prior to initiation of. construction, police and fire departments shall be notified and the departments shall be kept informed about duration and extent of construction throughout the process. X 14. Public Works Department shall provide alternate routes for traffic during the construction phase, if necessary. Adequate signage shall be provided to warn motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians of construction. X 15. Prior to construction of the roadway, a map indicating the location of all current and abandoned oil wells within the right-of-way shall be submitted to the Community Development and Fire Departments. All oil facilities within the boundaries of the designated right-of-way are to be removed and abandoned, reabandoned and shall meet all existing requirements of the City of Huntington Beach and the State Division of Oil and Gas. Further protective measures may be required, depending upon the conditions and quality of the abandonments and reabandonments. Additionally, any mobile homes which are placed over abandoned oil wells must be equipped with a household "methane detector." The property owner shall be responsible for all abandonment and reabandonment expenses and liabilities. t 9itigation. Measures -3- (4597d) PACIFIC COAST HOMES 2120 MAIN STREET, SUITE 260 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2499 (714)536-8917 March 30, 1990 Mr. Bob Franklin :` 1990 Associate Planner Community Development- Planning Dept °E=RAR - ,y U 2000 Main Street coronlum;r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PLA.NKII C, PIV;SION Seapoint St./Garfield Ave... Proposed Street Alignment Dear Bob: As you know, we have supp©rted your proposed street alignment for the Seapoint Street and Garfield Avenue extensions for sometime. In anticipation of approval of the alignment as shown on plans supplied by Walden and Associates and which are in conformance with the recently adopted Holly-Seacliff General Plan Amendment, we have been attempting to relocate or remove potential right-of-way interferences. We have been working off of road construction plans that were .submitted to the Public Works Department in October 1989. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (CUSA) is the oil lease operator on this property and we have been working with them to relocate pipelines and abandon facilities that are impacted by the proposed street alignment. We have been actively clearing the right-of-way since November 1989. The following major items have been completed since that time: 1. Abandonment of 19 oil wells including: Wells No. A-87, A-88, A-89, A-97, A-125, A-143, A-150, A-183X, A-232, A- 242, A-255, A-263, A-266, A-274, A-276, A-283A, A-286, A-287 and C-9A. 2. Clean up and removal of the "Main Basin". This was a large multi-section concrete settling basin approximately 8' deep, about 50' wide and about 280' long. 3. Clean up and removal of several tanks, pipe gathering systems and electrical facilities at "W" Island near the proposed intersection of Seapoint Street and Garfield Avenue. 4. Deepening several pipelines including: Two gas lines under proposed Seapoint Street to the Shell Western E & P Inc (SWEPT) gas plant west of Seapoint. Mr. Bob Franklin March 30, 1990 Page Two Five production lines under proposed Garfield Avenue to the CUSA Bolsa lease. In addition to the ongoing CUSA work, we have been working to resolve two 16" gas line conflicts for lines belonging to the Southern California Gas Company and the City of Long Beach. We have also approached SWEPT concerning partial relocation of sound walls around their gas plant. A substantial amount of work has already been completed to clear the proposed right-of-way for the Seapoint Street/Garfield Avenue extensions. Only a few outstanding items remain to be relocated. We appreciate your support for approval of the proposed street alignment. If you have any questions concerning relocation and abandonment work already . completed or planned in the near future, please contact me. Very truly yours, a on B erley RCB/j cc: W. D. Holman �. Figure 6 City of Huntington Beach Circulation Plan AMENDMENTS �\ R.•r.. „bras .- w-.•+\� ••�- ii r •r r. , LEGEND: FREEWAY MAJOR PRIMi►FY i SECONDARY � itt r / CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA �. • �•w .+ wr •u� -~ 15 Figure 5 Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways Ob OhJAby ' •t-= Ctn AP :'i• q ♦ `OT f 4 j i �� ' •y` tF J� ! Moto 4ft I s( q0 /r )vf = rm - r si = w 1 i 00 MAIN ST y`� ♦ F�! Legend I .77H D T , �J^^ Major ' r �d Primary *f �� Secondary an MR am R - Primary Study Area Boundary 14 �- Environmental Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Department of Community Development April 27, 1990 Environmental Resources Section City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Mr. Robert Franklin I . Subject: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4/Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46/Negative Declaration No. 89-63 Project Request: Precise plan of street alignment of Seapointe Avenue and a portion of Garfield Avenue. Location: Seapointe Street from PCH to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street to the City Boundary. II . Findings: The Environmental Board has completed it review of the referenced project and recommends that the following issues be addressed before approval of this project. (a) The proposed alignment plan would result in a 2.7 acre loss to the Bolsa Chica Linear Park. Although staff's report states that this acreage will be made up elsewhere, it does not state from where this acreage will come. The Environmental Board believes that this "make up" acreage should be included as a mitigative measure in the Negative Declaration; and it should be defined as part of the Linear Park so that no net loss of Linear Park acreage would occur. III . EXI Recommendation: THE PROJECT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO FINDINGS. It is the Environmental Board's recommendation that the referenced project be approved with the Environmental Board Committee's findings as described in paragraph II as a part of con itions. R y H. Richardson Ad hoc Committee Chairman Joan Siegal Irene Alfiere cc: Mayor Thomas Mays Councilman Peter Green Planning Commissioner Liaison Victor Liepzig )Ami 05 P.O: Box 3748, Huntington Beach, CA 92605-3748 • (714) 897-7003 61sa .. B g I "h ® Chica May 1 , 1990 HB Planning Commission City Hall Huntington Beach California Re: Street Alignment 89-4 Coastal Dev. Permit 89-46 Dear Commissioners, On behalf of the Amigos de Bolsa Chica Board of Directors, I would like to share their concerns with you regarding approval this evening of 'the Garfield/Seapoint connector. While the Amigos fully supports the Pacific Coast Highway/ Seapoint alignment and early construction ; we see problems with premature connection of Seapoint and the proposed Garfield exten- sion in the area of the swale. Our concern with the early alignment and construction of the Garfield/Seapoint -lihkup centers on the :fact that the cross- gap connector, for all 'of its local support, remains unapproved at state and federal levels: If such approval is ultimately gaiiied through overcoming both Coastal Act and Environmental Protection Act wetlands protective provisions, the recommended alignment makes sense. But if approval's are not forthcoming, the linkup in the swale will inhibit smooth flow of traffic both into and out of the areas .'it is intended to serve and it will have been a great waste of money. We are also concerned that the City is proceeding prematurely with this alignment based upon informal advig-e that is to be contained in a yet to be finished consultant traffic report. The Amigos is concerned that they are seeing two very different standards being applied to adjacent property owners. While the County of Orange rejected an initial traffic modeling study for the Bolsa Chica and adjacent areas due to inadequacies and put a slowdown on the Bolsa Chica Plan approvals, the same rejected report was used by the City as a basis of approval recommendation for the Holly=Seacliff General Plan Amendment for the Huntington Beach Company. While we -realize that there are two different approving agencies and two different landowners, the properties are adjacent , equally complex and inter-related. We can not rationalize the difference in the manner and speed with which the processing for each is occurring. NNW Page Two, Amigos to HB Planning, 5/1/90, Street Align #89-4 Additionally, while many street configurations are being tested and. presented for the Bolsa Chica Mesa and lowlands, no alternative. alignments for the Garfield/Seapoint hookup have been publicly presented and analyzed. Amigos recommends that an alternative alignment showing Seapoint linking up with 'Garfield at the" Garfield/Edwards intersection in a "T" consigeration be-given consideration, . especially due 't.o the speculative nature of state & federal approvals of the crossgap connector. Further, we would like to request that any approval of Seapoint ' s eastern alignment be continued, in the minimum, until there has been public review of upcoming traffic consultant reports, and preferably that approval of the link-up be delayed until there is more certainty of state and federal approvals of the crossgap connector to avoid dis-location of the traffic 'pattern. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns. Sincerely yours, Lorraine Faber Past president i fi. ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST INVESTIGATIONS SITE CA-ORA-366 LOCATED ON WESTERN HUNTINGTON BEACH MESA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Att: Mr. Robert Franklin Prepared by: SCIENTIFIC RESOURCE SURVEYS, INC. 5232 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 5 Huntington Beach, California 92649-1053 Att: Dr. Nancy A. Whitney-Desautels March 23, 1990 SRS Job #936 INTRODUCTION The following report is submitted by Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. (SRS) in response to a request by Mr. Robert Franklin, City of Huntington Beach, to conduct archaeological investigations on archaeological site, CA- Ora-366. The site will potentially be disturbed by a proposed road development which forms an extension of Garfield Avenue. On March 23, 1990, SRS staff, Mr. Franklin, and William Holman from The Huntington Beach Company, conducted a site visit and established the project area. The subsequent archaeological investigations included: 1) a geophysical program to locate subsurface features including pipelines and site disturbance; 2) an auger program to determine the areal extent of the archaeological site within the limits of the project area, and the depth of deposits within the site areas; 3) hand excavation of one, one meter square hole (archaeological unit) to recover a sample of the subsurface deposits to evaluate the nature ' and content of the subsurface materials; and 4) laboratory processing and analysis - of recovered materials including speciation of recovered shellfish remains. This report provides the findings of the archaeological investigation. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Archaeological site CA-Ora-366 is located south of Meadowlark Airport in Huntington Beach, California (Figure 1) . Specifically, the site is situated on the west edge of Huntington Beach Mesa overlooking Bolsa Chica Bay to the west and the Pacific Ocean to the west and southwest (Figure 2) . The topography in this coastal band consists of uplifted landforms which were produced during the Pleistocene epoch by faulting and anticlinal folding, and subsequent fluvial erosion which formed the lowland gaps between them. The underlying geology of both the uplands and lowlands contain an abundant source of oil . For this reason, active oil drilling has occurred in and around the archaeological site for decades which has disturbed the site to varying degrees. In addition, an access road flanked by water and sewer lines bisects the site, further disturbing the subsurface deposits. 1 30, R.15 W 1 R 14 W. 8 15`R.13 W. b Q5 R.12 W. O R.11 W. ST PK Z- l-1L I °I al •( ' N T r^ .Y d 7Q J' r p I o f. ^ai — 15 _ _ let •''�td - 1 N L I !z N /MOf1Tf L D' 7, Playa del Rey ti C51 I l TI G SON _ 7<`''Sonia IF 1rin r y �.•_� oil wood Pa G`A \7, R. eTre k y Los Ang tf Inleroational - — -- - - -PJ/A K_�_LC _ -. i_' t•....j t ...._ r _ �� DOCKWELLER BEACH -% STATE PARK 90i `•' _Lonna p/El Segundo `I\,I r, Ha th me � 1 .l1 I —- I \ I � /�t•� D Oil Jie• tL OOD Hall - Pipelinee•1j I A T,10 NE \ _ , ILLO JS AN M I TAN BEAC o o —LN AL MANHATTAN D W �r, t of ii��a�;- PTO 1I •'° l�. �•� '•�BEACH ST P K ^I�� o14. •�^ � ras �J noel°o ° �.� --y r7es1 U A Herm Beach 3 �� - .:. o - w r• r b ; .. 1• -_ - -' 7 I ' rC1t11 F.7 c' IC'91 ' I I c•• 211A7 E iCH I OjJ fie =g ; L 5 CuIY• AI atu {d CFI" _ •.4 -+ I_ '75 � f Flol ock Poin -- _ fi i� 1 ��:• L.— °1-. 5 S 777 r�ry t� J Imi t •• / t 1� -!`- l osAl mito Palo a.}r���.J'el(- f G r pk n 1 / P I ar ... Pofn o �11 ��•� ��l�El` A T �• �._ —;�EAIGH:---� � pb,I t7 ,Y b ° r6 _.L.._. Rero Point iJj r ` r -�� - it fi �Grir:om 1 N EAL E il, � "ti.,_�_'s� •\ R �S D oWhira I � E C - `�•irp 1 Hdt'� ,• '�,Chafree 1 _ BEA PLoyl J� �•-y d e Coin L { )NAVAL BASE \�� SEAL BE1� H� . 9 . r rrrr :r. r n S.. NPFDR 13 Light SO ` Rerer.alion oornt e, o o • Sunset Be t !1u over Reser ePloolnP MacArthur it sunset a� L ghls Plot forms ' ea lark 0 �r Sunset 3ull i ht Point ermin Lighi Plot or g P -. ) ' - 5' PI form j Q Platform I H,UNTINRrON BEACH ` N Pt RID LL Y i 43W 42�� 3;J 8811 P rn -... i :;7��' Pil e' e . q -.N I s�ti I � I ` _ .� ! i . j - - - J-- 50 - - 1 ` yi I too 1. o 750 F j I 00 Z I Figure I.General Location of Subject Property. USGS Long Beach Quad. scale 1-250,000 1 _ 0 N N I" MN 11/ l949 to N N O N V ; I t-::(HDV38 1NO JM3N)IT - - --- + - — ` _ l I ii�• .�� Y\ :1; (� /(') `.IIL.� „.,!- .p" _�I 1 .� � c-�:•'� ./'—�' /, �•\�.�'\v-mil/\ !C o •l!� i .�' / •J ,'.° I' '�c •j'" Fes- I ' � 'u,. \4, $' \ o III,, �• �'II /� �� !. 'il' ��.�`',:_, i!��: .:/ ,1w r { � i. 9��'� w„�o ^�^ o , 7. ' '1 ��� /i../ ro,o„ ''� ( 'nf- t /T� �,I� � j.(1 '• �„}' �Y `{� Y I � r n � �� ���• L`/E�`rS �ro I/o _ i 3�- �-,�J'� •�� \� TI��-���( vv,• •Ij a' Ltr'I'�Ir n''°�•• l � 'I / �N o�'•�` A.. �'•/P�o J:. ✓f' ��r , J y� -•�f � �f K .. U V I „ •1 1� ' r ?�I/�(�7�� `I_ � ...���1�,� s�,ylt � .��,f�.Lo a .. 1 :.... Q�' i� -I'.,1 11 .�� 'h �.,I,r„ '`0,5�o,^" lil, 11 yf'i��u'I z \/ J al'%E"� •p �\�J/ r �•/)�, qI 'i, I' � o � f- -r-��f � � f Ih,E � 'I I, .IU` ( !•,��' ,u UY `'�I:p 71 ` r+ll������l( �il ��I � 'Y fir- / 1/•�� � \ ,��J• / l`I�'rn'��•r"'o�\/ry�j��!,''//�'�s/ . IjL "�"7 q�� ° .( ..o �^ I '��.I ,�1, .c�_/ / I I< u�y� �l���..�y,:/��.,l:C,�J3�/�i�• � . 1 �'\"4 � /(?.'�II �1 � •W •Z�-• `�L/'a...(P'.,��� �1�1 � '� ,�!��\'iv o o�d�'.�^`or �`t'!. :I �--- .� „�.., f�, ;1��.,•_<;-lk �lc3c'e� rJ':: � ,,. .,b,;� >• ' U . "cO �--��%� - _ l.. o rl •`� %q r f :.'r'�I �fn. � _ ^�p\•�' o�i'tYo '3•. ._�__ ,v .� / I'�il n(,If�d .i' ^i^//r ,�'!'�.� L/ •�(1.�•u� '.i` lV,.. 4�; �• a"�;.�.,`,y.I, '�/�^ T�S�Q r. r,------ C 4-,JC-� l 1T11; sarlvnia; 1/(S '/(/"1it 1? (r, �,�1 \ II'„ v •.L '• O CV a'l rl ca i i ,-�' I �_ \ ((�i '\ r� f(' ���N� z--r0 I'�I �'/ 1`�=" ^ ♦ ?' r. r`` a�i rYt ° !A CIS ca U ��s _ '-,�.'- �— 1°� !� '1 ', �• ',,' t' I \ /.; / ate. f� I,� _ co ..�: I ! I / `) `r,.• `t':�•, `r I \\ � %� pry: •� � G. •�:::._ _:(:_:I_ell,�l; !r _�i•...a�1r .l;'l�l� CO �� Ilgl� � •i:'• U ' ��� :.� � co IF.JI 1 ;:fir/S l �...�-- ^ '+Pl�r,� n / •��\� \' `�1 ��� i •i .•�� ,n � � n / •' 11 Z/ t BACKGROUND INFORMATION A total of twenty archaeological sites ring Bolsa Chica Bay on Bolsa Chica Mesa and western Huntington Beach Mesa. Most archaeological sites in this area are located on the uplands, which overlook the lowlands separating them. The lowlands were orginally embayments. However, it is postulated that siltation decreased the size of these embayments. Sand bar or spit formations may have converted the bays to estuaries or lagoons while increasing siltation caused salt water and fresh water marsh formation at the inland margin of the lowlands. Siltation would have decreased the available habitat for bay/estuary shellfish and increased the marsh habitat. During the prehistoric period (ca. 6,000 B.C. to A.D. 1769) these wetlands provided a diversity of natural resources which were exploited by the aboriginal populations inhabiting sites on the neighboring mesas. Bays, estuaries, salt water marsh, and fresh water marsh provide different kinds of food resources which could have been exploited by the prehistoric inhabitants of the area. Studies of the local archaeological sites provides evidence for dating changing environments, since shellfish remains from the archaeological sites can be dated. All of the sites on Bolsa Chica Mesa and western Huntington Beach Mesa are shell middens. These are areas where prehistoric inhabitants of the region processed shellfish for. consumption and discarded the shell . What is in question is what other activities were carried out at these sites. All of the archaeological test programs conducted so far indicate that these sites were occupied during the Milling Stone Horizon (prior to 1000 B.C. ) and the Intermediate Horizon (1000 B.C. to A.D. 750). No evidence, other than isolated projectile points, for occupation of these sites during the Late Prehistoric Horizon (A.D. 750 to A.D. 1769) has been reported; yet eastern Huntington Beach Mesa and Newport Bay uplands all contain sites belonging to this more recent time period. In addition, the low artifact yield and lack of features at most sites probably indicate that most of these sites were seasonally occupied shellfish processing stations. Available information from shell analyses indicates that the most commonly harvested shellfish genera were Argopecten 4 (Pecten) , Chione, and Ostrea. These are all bay/estuary shellfish. Genera which are significant at some sites include Tivela and the gastropods, Polinices, Crucibulum, and Crepidula. The absence of Late Prehistoric sites surrounding Bolsa Chica Bay may be the result of siltation reducing the shellfish habitat in the bay. The major species collected during these early periods, could not have survived siltation and the creation of a marsh habitat. Where information about vertebrate faunal procurement is available, it appears that the most commonly procured vertebrates were bat rays and guitarfish available in the shallow waters of the bay/estuary. Sea mammals are also present, as well as ducks. Terrestrial animals are less common, with deer rare or absent. CA-Ora-366- This small shell midden was recorded in 1972 by Martin and Cooley of Archaeological Research, Inc. as part of the city-wide survey conducted for the City of Huntington Beach and a simultaneous study of both Bolsa Chica Mesa and Huntington Beach Mesa by Signal Landmark, Inc. At the time of recordation, a light scatter of shellfish remains, chert blade fragments and a groundstone fragment were noted on the surface. However, the site form notes that the top portion of the site appeared to have been removed so that dark midden remains only on the slope edges. The site has never been excavated. The significance of the site lies in its ability to add information to the regional research base regarding prehistoric subsistence and settlement patterns. If the site, for instance, proved to belong to the Late Prehistoric time period, the site would be the only one, out of twenty surrounding Bolsa Chica Bay, which was occupied into recent times. The research design for the excavations, then, was oriented towards determining if subsurface deposits still exist on the mesa in the area known to contain Ora-366; and if subsurface deposits are present, what cultural materials are found in the deposit which can yield information regarding: period of occupation, type of occupation, and activities which occurred on this knoll . 5 METHODS OF INVESTIGATION A four-part investigation was conducted from April 5th through April 13th, 1990. Project personnel included: Dr. Nancy A. Whitney-Desautels, Principal Investigator; Robert M. Beer, Geophysicist; Jacqueline D. Desautels, Field Director; Jon Cizek, Photographer and Graphic Artist; and Philip Desautels and William Camp, Field and Laboratory technicians. An interim report briefly outlining the methods and results was submitted to the City of Huntington Beach on March 16, 1990. The geographical situation of Ora-366 (in an oil field) required that several unique techniques be used in order to safely and adequately fulfill the scope of work. For example, archaeologists normally - do not have available in-house geophysical equipment to find pipelines, a mini-skid steer loader with an auger attachment which avoids delays due to scheduling auger companies, and jackhammers and generators for breaking through asphalt. Without these instruments, the current project presented some risk of hitting unknown pipelines with the auger and, also, being unable to penetrate the ground through several asphalt layers. The archaeological investigation included the following methods of survey and excavation: 1. A geophysical program to locate subsurface features including pipelines and site disturbance. The geophysical program included a radar survey (ground penetrating radar) , an electro-magnetic survey (using the EM-38) , and a cable and ' pipeline survey (using a Schonstedt and a Metrotech) . Photographs showing three of these instruments in use at Ora-366 are provided on Figure 3. 2. An auger program where a total of 16 holes were drilled using a 12 inch auger bit attached to a New Holland skid-steer loader (Figure 3) . All auger holes were drilled to sterile earth or hard decomposed Pleistocene terrace deposits. All earth removed by the auger was screened through one- eighth inch screen mesh in order to collect subsurface cultural materials, if such existed. The purpose of the auger program was to determine the 6 r�'-r. l, F,`.'Lr -..rf:':::;...:ric"::!•v,�1(^.�`n�:' iiJ y� p s bit Ir areal extent of the site and depth of deposits. The holes were drilled in a systematic fashion over the project area. Site boundaries were established by the presence or absence of cultural materials found in each auger hole. 3. Hand excavation of one (1) , one meter square unit to recover a sample of the subsurface materials. The unit was excavated by two methods. First, a jackhammer was used to remove asphalt and fill layers from the surface of the property in the area of the excavation unit. Second, a hand pick (and trowel , when appropriate) was used to loosen the subsurface deposits in 10 cm. levels below the ground surface. Both hand excavation methods are shown on Figure 3. As each 10 cm. level was excavated, all earth was thrown into a shaker screen with one-eighth inch -hardware cloth covering the bottom. The hand unit was placed in the area of potentially intact midden (prehistoric deposit) in order to recover a sample of the materials to evaluate the nature and content of the deposit. Hand excavation was limited to one unit to preserve the small portion of the potentially intact deposit still remaining on the knoll . 4. Laboratory processing and analysis of recovered materials including shell speciation and soils sample analysis. Shell analysis included weighing all recovered shell , and then separating all shell into like species. Counts for each species were taken and were based on recording the number of hinges or apices (valve hinge for bivalves and apex for gastropods/univalves) . Soils analysis included examining the sediments for internal consistency or natural deposition versus mixed or modified deposits. 8 GEOPHYSICAL METHODS Between April 6 and 11, 1990 Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. conducted a geophysical investigation at archaeological site Ora-366 located within property controlled by Chevron USA Inc. on the Huntington Beach Mesa. The purpose of this investigation was to define areas of disturbance, thickness of midden deposits, and locate underground obstructions prior to the excavation of a backhoe trench for site testing. Particular attention was given to anomalies that may indicate the presence of underground pipelines or other utilities since the site is located within an operating oil field. Both magnetic and electromagnetic techniques were utilized. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) uses high frequency electromagnetic waves to provide information on the nature and geometry of subsurface reflecting horizons and to delineate underground structures such as buried tanks, pipelines, and other utilities. Energy is radiated downward into the subsurface from a transmitting antenna which is moved slowly across the surface of the ground. This electromagnetic energy is differentially reflected back to a receiving antenna, where variations in the return signal are continuously recorded on a graphic recorder. The reflections produce a continuous cross-sectional profile of the shallow subsurface conditions. The vertical axis represents the two-way travel time of the reflected radar signal and may be calibrated to depth by obtaining information over known sources. The response variations of the return signal are caused by radar wave reflections from distinctive interfaces of materials having different electrical properties. Such reflections are often associated with natural geologic conditions such as bedding, cementation, moisture and clay content, voids, fractures, and intrusions, as well as man-made objects. Detectability is strongly controlled by interrelated factors such as size, contrast in properties, sharpness of the change, and the smoothness of the reflecting surface. The depth of investigation is strongly controlled by near-surface soil conditions. Excellent results are obtained in dry sands and well-drained soils, whereas soils with a high clay content generally yield poorer results. The frequency of operation generally ranges from 80 to 900 MHz. A 500 MHz antenna was used during this study. 9 Measurement of terrain conductivity is generally the most effective geophysical technique available to provide information on subsurface disturbance. Measurements are taken continuously and, due to the freedom from wires and direct ground contact, the technique provides a rapid means of site evaluation The principle of operation of the EM-38 is as follows: a transmitter antenna generates an audio frequency primary magnetic field; this field induces electrical eddy currents within the ground which in turn generate a secondary magnetic field which is measured by a receiver antenna. The ratio of these magnetic fields varies with ground conductivity and the presence of metallic conductors, which have a conductivity signature that differs from that of soil . The instrument is responsive to the electrical properties of the upper 3 to 5 feet of soil , with most of the response being derived from the upper two feet. Values are read in terms of apparent ground conductivity, measured in millimhos per meter (mmholm) . A region of anomalous values is generally associated with unusual soil conditions, such as brine, petroleum product contamination, or buried "trash" . The presence of metallic conductors, such as buried tanks, pipel-ines, or metallic debris will also cause distinctive anomalous values. A Schonstedt gradient magnetometer is used for locating and rapidly tracing buried metallic conductors such as pipelines and cables, and for defining individual metallic objects such as underground storage tanks. The unit detects the magnetic gradient associated with the metallic conductors and is capable of working in relatively close proximity to objects with known high- field gradients. The Metrotech M-480 locator is used for the detailed tracing of individual conductors, such as product lines associated with underground tanks. This instrument is capable of tracing individual lines in highly congested areas. The unit consists of a transmitter and a separate receiver. The transmitter is used to inject an audio-frequency signal into a metallic conductor such as a pipeline through inductive or conductive coupling. The conductor simulates a large antenna and radiates this signal . Inasmuch as the acoustic signature and input signal levels are known, the signal radiation pattern can be traced using the receiver, thereby outlining the buried conductor. The Metrotech M-480 locator is also used for locating buried metallic objects in confined areas. 10 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY DOCUMENTATION The primary backhoe trench location was established in the field prior to the geophysical investigation. The southeast endpoint is marked by a vertical pipe. The line trends 330 degrees true WOW) . A telephone pole is online at 303 feet (3+03) from the southeast endpoint. The line extends downslope offsite 400 feet from the southeast endpoint. Reference marks . were painted on the ground at 25-foot intervals beginning at the southeast endpoint (0+00) . Distances were written every 100 feet (ie 1+00, 2+00, 3+00, and 4+00) . A paved road crosses the line between 1+50 and 1+70. The slope breaks toward the northwest at 3+35, a small trench crosses the line between 3+81 and 3+86. The northwest endpoint is located at 4+00. Radar profiles along the backhoe trench alignment were run in three segments. Line la - 0+00 to 1+70; Line lb - 1+35 to 3+20; Line lc - 2+40 to 4+00. A secondary profile, Line 2, was run north from the graded area west of the road downslope and offsite. The southern endpoint of this profile began at point 2+25 on the primary alignment. The line trended 005 degrees true (NO5E) and ended 185 feet to the north. Points were marked on the ground at 25-foot intervals. The southern endpoint is established as 0+00 and the northern endpoint as 1+85. A mound of disturbed material approximately 5 feet wide is midway between 0+50 and 0+75. A pipeline crosses the line on the surface at 1+32 and an abrupt slope break is at 1+81. Radar data was obtained using a GSSI Sir-3 GPR system on 4/6/90. The system was run at 0 - 25 ns full scale, 100 lines/inch density, with a radar transmission speed of 16 scans per second. A magnetic/electromagnetic survey was conducted on 4/8/90 to investigate all radar anomalies and specifically to locate underground obstructions such as pipelines. The depth of investigation of all the techniques utilized is limited to approximately 3 to 4 feet below grade at this site location. Pipelines located in this manner were marked on the ground. 11 Based on the results of the initial geophysical studies conducted on April 6 and 8, 1990 and the subsequent auger program, two additional radar profiles were run parallel to the primary alignment and offset 50 feet to the east and west. Magnetic/electromagnetic data were also obtained along these alignments to identify underground utilities. Additional geophysical lines were also run to aid in the siting of Excavation Unit A. 12 MECHANICAL EXCAVATION The geophysical investigation resulted in the location and mapping of eight subsurface pipelines or metal cables which do not appear on City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works maps, as shown on Figure 4. All cross hairs on each oblique line of investigation which are labelled "P" or "EM" are indicating either the current or past presence of a pipeline or cable or similar object within the project area. These have been further underscored with a blue line for clarity. Auger holes were placed in and around these anomalies to avoid pipeline penetration by the auger and potentially dangerous problems such as gas line explosions. The ground penetrating radar was first used to locate anomalies; pipelines or metal objects (i .e. cables) were then located by the EM 38, Schonstedt and Metrotech. Since each instrument reads different properties, the four instruments complemented each other to provide a high level of confidence that the major objects within the area-of investigation were located. Figure 5 provides reduced copies of radar profiles which gives four examples of disturbance to the project area including: a filled trench; surface and sub-surface disturbance (i .e. previous grading) ; an individual point source (metal piece, bottle, etc. ) ; and a buried pipe. All four instruments have the ability to read anomalies which are characteristic of buried pipelines or other metallic objects. Ground penetrating radar is particularly useful in locating pipelines manufactured from non-ferrous materials (i .e. plastic water lines) , since the trench which was excavated for the line can be found. In this way, both ferrous and non-ferrous materials can be located and avoided during excavation. All areas which were intended for either mechanical or hand excavation were first examined by geophysical equipment to locate any subsurface anomalies which could be avoided during ground penetration. 13 SB l Ry 30p' EL � aS Ca—Ora-366 0 7 e 16 Western Extent Ora=366 P 6 200. UNiTA FM oo. 0 12 15 5 j 218?oo- A � P F i ad Exist n Ro 'r . . 9 :•:::. F '' WL(existing) Fi f*R F 4 R/tr�neh/ 100- 14 eil, W L —WL 11 (removed) l00_ 3 13 outhern.Exterit Ora_ -366 l000 10 2 P = Pipe/Cable P DM = Disturbed (mound) Rd = Disturbed area (radar) P EM = EM38 anomaly/gradient SB = Slope break R = Radar anomaly R O WL = Waterline (City map) S = Surface Rd OAuger hole % `�9�% ` scale 1": 40' 6' 0 2, `�"""' Figure 4. Site Map Ora-366 i ot TL d 4F W 71-44 104 YX 7 L 4 1 J 7 surfa e and sub-surface filled trench disturbance Ca-Ora-366 16 Extent Ora-360 Western 200. UN/TA FM MExl EM ME wLf-,.kqj— em 4 too- 14 _WL I too- 3 $outhe n Exta t Ora See 10 2 P - Pipe/Cable qVivylivi-11111;V,41 1111w,111111, RIP-1111H.: qj Vt.11).0 DM Di sturbed (moundgll~lft~. 4V pMWWWW"'WPW J­q Rd Disturbed area ( EM EM38 anomaly/gra S8 Slope break Will Laulkag t uluugwrda R - Radar anomaly A Waterline (City If (D S Surface (D* Auqee' hole stale 1':40' 0 A 01 FIgurs 3.Site Map 04 a W-4446IS6. ;11 pit- 114 ,:' .C. ) k:.l.,�r"�.(�dh :f e�,"�I �� .1� ,.;:... x•��r1..�`r Iw«�1• r.• IF Fit VA N,Ir, point-sourd'e buried pipe Figure 5. Radar Results with Radar Profiles For site boundary definition, an initial line of auger holes were drilled (holes #1-8) from southwest to northeast along a line which traversed the project area (Figure 4) . This auger line indicated that quantities of shell were found in holes #3, 4, 5, and 6. Parallel lines were then examined by the geophysical instruments and areas for drilling laid out to avoid potential hazards. , Auger holes #9-11 were all void of cultural materials; however, auger #12 produced substantial shell remains. Sampling of this line proved to limit the site boundaries along the eastern portion of the project to the area north of the existing road. The last auger line (western line) contained holes #13 - 16. All four of these holes were also void -of materials; allowing for the conclusion that the site area did not extend this far west. The site area as defined by the auger program is outlined in red on Figure 4 and based on the subsurface data provided below: Auger #1: No cultural materials; asphalt @ 45 cm. ; clay @ 50 cm. Auger #2: No cultural materials; clay @ 45 cm. Auger #3: Two asphalt layers to 25 cm. ; shell from 25-70 cm. Auger #4: Basalt chopper @ 20cm. ; asphalt @ 30 cm. ; shell from 30 cm. to 80 cm. ; styrofoam @ 60 cm. Auger #5: Shell materials from 5 cm. to 98 cm. Auger #6: Shell materials from 10 cm. to 85 cm. Auger #7: Gravel to 40 cm. ; shell from 30 cm. to 70 cm. Auger #8: Gravel to 10 cm. ; shell @ 15 cm; clay @ 20 cm. Auger #9: No cultural materials; asphalt @ 30 cm. ; clay @ 90 cm. Auger 10: No cultural materials; glass @ 20 cm. ; clay @ 40 cm. .Auger 11: No cultural materials; gravel to 10 cm. ; asphalt @ 20 cm. sand to clay @ 95 cm. Auger 12: Asphalt to .20 cm. ; shell to 60 cm. in quantity; clay @ 60 cm. Auger 13: 1 piece shell @ 40 cm. ; 1 piece shell @ 50 cm. Auger 14: Shell to 60 cm. ; asphalt and metal to 40 cm. Auger 15: Shell fragment @ 20 cm. ; asphalt @ 10 cm; metal @ 20 cm. Auger 16: No cultural materials; hard compact clay @ 38 cm. 16 HAND EXCAVATION The results of the auger program clearly outlined areas of the site which either were void of cultural materials or contained cultural materials mixed with modern materials. An analysis of this information, coupled with the known areas of disturbance as shown by the geophysical study, provided evidence that the site area south of the existing road was too heavily disturbed to be of use in adding additional information to regional research regarding prehistoric use of the area. Hand units were not dug in this area since modern disturbance had destroyed the integrity and, therefore, significance of this area. The area north of the existing road, between auger holes #5,- 6, and 12 (and eastward) appeared to be relatively intact. Consistent shell deposits, with very little lower disturbance, continued to 100 cm. in some areas. Hand unit A was, therefore, placed in this area after a specialized 'mini ' search with geophysical equipment had been performed. The unit measured one meter by one meter in size. The unit was excavated to 60 cm. where hard, red clay from the Pleistocene terrace deposit was encountered. An auger hole was then drilled to 80 cm. to verify that no buried shell deposit existed below the clay layer. No artifactual materials were located during excavation and screening of earth from this unit. However, quantities of shell remains were recovered as listed below: Species 20-30cm 30-40cm 40-50cm 50-60cm Pecten sp. 1 6 44 19 Chione sp. 4 26 33 10 Tegula sp. 1 5 3 1 Crepidula sp. - 2 5 5 Acmaea sp. - 1 4 5 Haliotis sp. - 1 1 1 Tivela stultorum - 1 2 - Ostrea lurida - 1 7 2 Pododesmus cepio - - - 4 Total Count (hinges) 6 43 99 47 Total Weight (grams) 105 401 874 341 17 The first twenty centimeters of the area did not produce shell materials due to previous disturbance. Within this these two levels were: two layers of asphalt overlying a layer of fill . The fill also covered a layer of plastic; and the plastic was, in turn, laid on top of a layer of gravel . These materials were apparently laid down during the installation of pump A 218. Inadvertantly, these fill materials served to preserve the archaeological deposit in this area from present disturbance; i .e. vehicular traffic. The recovered shell materials are typical of those found at the other nineteen sites on Bolsa Chica and western Huntington Beach Mesas and do not indicate a divergence from those patterns, or a later period of occupation. Shell samples have been submitted for radiocarbon dating which will accurately pinpoint the period of use of this site by the prehistoric inhabitants. Until the shell dates are returned from Beta Analytic, Coral Gables, Florida (approximately one month) it will not be known when the was site used. The shell deposit, and-lack of other prehistoric materials, also indicates that this site is typical of the surrounding sites, and appears to be a seasonal shell processing station. No other site activities can be inferred from the finds. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of the current investigations are that the small portion of the site which exists south of the modern road has been disturbed to the extent that it is no longer useful for reconstructing site activities which occurred during prehistoric times on Ora-366. The deposits north of the . road, however, are intact and appear to have inadvertantly been protected over the years by modern fill materials related to the installation of oil pump A218. The proposed road (extension of Garfield Avenue) should be fenced along the northern perimeter so that no road construction activities can occur on the remaining intact portions of 0ra-366. 18 REQUEb FOR CITY COUNCO ACTION oa, so C' � Date May 21, 1990 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator ��_ Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Development 's Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 Consistent with Council Policy? [%4 Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception OaPD 2 o YS Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 which will establish the precise alignment for Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street . Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 addresses coastal act concerns and Negative Declaration No. 89-63 addresses the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Action on May 1, 1990: ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 89-63 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: ORGEGA, LEIPZIG ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46 BASED UPON FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: ORTEGA, LEIPZIG ' ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE (See Attachment No. 2 for Findings.- and Conditions of Approval) 100, Plo 5/85 ON MOTION BY WILLIAMS AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 1430 APPROVING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 89-4 BASED UPON FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: SHOMAKER, MOUNTFORD, WILLIAMS, KIRKLAND, BOURGUIGNON NOES: ORTEGA, LEIPZIG ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 89-163, approve Coastal Development Permit No. 89-46 and adopt Ordinance No. .3 0 y approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 . ANALYSIS• Seapoint Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway to the western extension of Garfield Avenue is designated as a secondary arterial with a right-of-way width of 100 feet . Garfield Avenue is designated as a major arterial, east of Edwards Street, and a primary arterial west of Edwards Street. The proposed precise plan of street alignment for Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street are consistent with the City' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways and with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways . The City of Huntington Beach has initiated Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 in response to on-going and proposed development in the Seacliff area. Tentative Tract No. 13527, a request to construct a 158 unit residential subdivision, was approved by the Planning Commission on January 18, 1989 . The following condition was imposed on Tentative Tract No. 13527: Seapoint Avenue shall be connected to Garfield Avenue and shall be open to the public prior to occupancy of the first unit. Design and width of the connection shall be subject to review and approval by Public Works, Fire and Community Development departments and final approval by the Planning Commission. The general alignment of Seapoint Avenue and Garfield Avenue has been adopted by the City since 1976 and numerous reports and environmental impact reports (EIR' s) for surrounding uses have included the future construction of both streets in traffic analysis sections . In 1980, the Seacliff EIR included reference to the future alignment and construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues . The EIR for the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan and the more recent Holly-Seacliff EIR both identified and analyzed the future construction of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues as proposed in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 . The need for the Seapoint connection presently exists in order to provide both emergency and non-emergency access to the existing Seacliff developments . On May 1, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1430 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 which establishes the right-of-way for Seapoint Avenue and an extension of RCA -2- (5706d) Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street. As indicated in the May 1, 1990, Planning Commission staff report, the proposed alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue are consistent with both the City and County Master Plans for arterial streets and highways. In addition, according to the City Traffic Engineer, the proposed alignment has been used in numerous traffic studies and Environmental Impact Reports over the past 10 years . The following is a summary of the proposed alignment and the Bolsa Chica Linear Park planning. Precise Planning of Seapoint Avenue has involved establishing legal descriptions for the alignments of the unconstructed ends of Seapoint Avenue. At the western end, (between Palm and Pacific Coast Highway) the alignment is dictated by the location of an existing 100 foot wide oil lease easement through the Shell Oil production area. Previous Linear Park plans only generally located that easement. A legal description of that easement has resulted in a minor shifting of Seapoint Avenue northward in that area from the alignment shown on Linear Park Plans . The park acreage lost at that point is negligible and staff does not see any alternative alignment as being feasible. Linear Park planning efforts to date have been conceptual in nature, and have not proposed boundaries so specific in location as to be defined by legal descriptions. Rather, boundaries have been generally defined by existing topographic lines, and existing and conceptually proposed street locations . In the area south of Garfield Avenue, the eastern park boundary has been established by the existing constructed portion of Seapoint Avenue (from Palm Avenue north part way to Garfield Avenue) and by assumptions regarding how Seapoint will be aligned in the area where it is not yet constructed or precisely planned. These assumptions were based upon general alignments depicted on the City and County Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. In summary, staff ' s position is that the proposed precise alignment of Seapoint and Garfield Avenues is the only feasible alignment, based upon engineering principles, existing land uses and existing easements. Further, the fact that the alignment causes 2 .7 acres to be lost from the Linear Park in one area does not reduce the total size of the park from the 113 acres approved by the Planning Commission, nor does it change the basic concept approved for configuration of the park. Rather, as park planning proceeds, a variety of engineering refinements will be made which will more precisely define the park boundary within the basic parameters of a 113 acre park size and the proposed park configuration. Also, replacement of the 2 . 7 acres lost to Seapoint will most likely be made up in the desirable bluff and swale areas north of Garfield Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the department posted draft Negative Declaration No. 89-63 for thirty days . On January 31, 1990, the Environmental Review Committee, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a Mitigated RCA -3- (5706d) Negative Declaration be approved with special studies which include an archaeological study of ORA-366. Prior to any action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 89-63 . Staff has received comments from the Environmental Board in a letter dated April 27, 1990 (see Attachment No. 4) . In summary, the environmental board recommends that the proposed alignment be approved with a finding that the proposed alignment shall result in no net loss of park acreage. FUNDING SOURCE: Not Applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may modify Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4 as desired. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map. 2. Findings and Conditions of Approval . 3 . Planning Commission staff report dated May 1, 1990 . 4 . Environmental Board letter dated April 27, 1990. 5 . Amigos de Bolsa Chica letter dated May 1, 1990. 6 . Archeological Report dated March 23, 1990 . 7. Ordinance No. 3045 MTU:MA:RLF:kjl RCA -4- (5706d) r_SAml os P.O. Box 3748, Huntington Beach, CA 92605-3748 • (714) 897-7003 de g = = o sa Chf ica May 21 , 1990 Re : Street Alignment 89-1 Coastal Dev. Permit 89-46 Negative Dedlaration #89-63 Dear Members of the City Council, I hope you have had time to read the Amigos letter to the Planning Commission regarding premature alignment of the Cross-Gap connector and the eastern extension of Seapoint. Our concerns remain the same. While we recommend the Pacific Coast Highway/Seapoint link-up at this time, we oppose finalization of the eastern end of Seapoint and the Garfield/ Cross-Gap connector until , at the minimum , the Balsa Chica Land Use Plan traffic studies and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) are available. We have two concerns regarding approval fo the EIR Negative Declaration 89-63. The first is the failure of the documentation to adequately describe the movement of 50 ,000 cubic yards of earth. Will all the soil moved be reused on the roadbeds? Will there be a surplus or- deficiency of fill? If a surplus, will the surplus from this public project be stockpiled for future use in the Linear Park improvement project? The second Negative Declaration concern relate, to the extension of the Precise Plan alignment for the Garfield/Cross-Gap connector beyond the Seapoint junction. Surely you can not use a Negative Declaration to align a roadway out onto the wetlands. Approximately one half the length of the extension beyond the junction is below the five foot countour line where the wetlands determination study maps the edge of tlee wetlands. Additionally, use of the Negative Declaration option has allowed the staff to evade having to document a EIR required analysis of alternative road routings thereby frustrating public debate and input. It would be like shadow boxing to debate the unacceptable routes staff has rejected without seeing them. Tha Amigas prefer that the eastern end of Seapoint be connected directly to Garfield at the Edwards Street intersection as the existing'.4service road does now. The finalization of the Cross-Gap connection should await state and federal approvals of the Coalition Plan for the Balsa Chica. Three additional points need to be dealt with before your final vote on this matter. Can you keep good faith with the promise to the CARP neighborhood to load the Cross-Gap connector with only 15, 000 daily auto trips with the design before you that directs traffic flow onto the connector? Can you be assured that the Planning Commission recommended action to terminate construction of Garfield/Cross-Gap connector at Seapoint will not cause a dangerous traffic hazard? The topographic map upon which the Precise Plan Page Two - Amigos to City. Council 5/21/SO in regards to Garfield and Sespoint connection. is drawn shows a steep drop of 20-30 feet just beyond the pro- posed intersection. Will you need to call out a run-off safety pit, or other mitigation? Thirdly, the roadway is being routed on/near earthquake faulting. If in the future there should be quake caused- damage to the road and the intended sewer trunk line below, what is the public cost risk factor for rebuilding the roadway and sewer trunk line? In conclusion, the Amigos Board of Directors thinks there are more reasons to delay decision tonight than reasons to take action. Your decisions should not be rushed because of the Conditition. of Approval requirement on .Tentative Tract Map *13527. It can be revoked and you .will still have the opportunity to make a similar requirement on three ne.w Huntington Beach Company tentative tract maps that have been filed. And if you will not delay action . we wou.ld. recommend, in the minimum, your deletion of all the language in the covering Ordinance *3045 that relates to approval of the Precise Plan alignment of the Garfield/Cross-Gap connector beyond the Seap©int connection. Please consider this, if for no reason other than the need for a focused EIR. Sincerely yours, Lorraine Faber Past President IS82-84 i '4 A 6 J 4-a �- S�aPo, hf Page 6 - Council/Agency Minutes - 5/21/90 There being no one present to speak further on matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or writte the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Councilman Silva presented an extensi list of concerns regarding the 1989 Housing Element Update that he woul ike addressed. A motion was made by MacAll er, seconded by Green, to continue the item regarding the 1989 Housing ement Update for the City of Huntington Beach for a study session and to et a new public hearing. The motion carried by the following roll call v AYES: MacAll ter, Winchell , Green, Mays, Silva NOES: Non ABSENT: B nister, Erskine The C Administrator stated that the new public hearing would be scheduled on a Housing Element following further review by the Council . (City Council) OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO 7/16/90 - DIRECTION GIVEN TO STAFF RE: SEAPOINT AVE - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT N0. 89-4/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-46 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 89-63 - (ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR SEAPOINT AVENUE AND A PORTION OF GARFIELD AVENUE) - ORDINANCE NO. 3048 (800.90) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following: 1 APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 89-4/Coastal - Development Permit No. 89-46/Negative Declaration No. 89-63 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Precise plan of Seapoint Avenue south to Pacific Coast Highway and north to Garfield Avenue and alignment of Garfield Avenue west of Edwards Street. ZONE: Various zoning districts (Industrial /Residential /Recreation/Open Space) . REQUEST: Approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment of Seapoint Avenue and an extension of Garfield Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No. 89-63. COASTAL STATUS: APPEALABLE This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed to the California Coastal Commission by an aggrieved party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. An aggrieved person may file an appeal within ten (10) working days , pursuant to the Public Resources Code, in writing to: California Coastal Commission, 245 W. Broadway, Suite 380, POB 1450, Long Beach, California 90801-1450 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City Council Action. Appli— cants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the 6.3 conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. v e- p ) r Page 7 - Council/Agency Minutes - 5/21/90 Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk' s Office by staff had been mailed, published, and posted. No communications or written protests were received on the matter. The Community Development Director presented a staff report. Mayor Pro Tempore Green spoke regarding the wording of the May 21 , 1990, RCA, Page 3, Paragraph 4. The Community Development Director stated he would delete the words "most likely" in the last sentence of the paragraph. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. Lorraine Faber, representing Amigos de Bolsa Chica, distributed a circulation plan of arterial streets and highways and a letter from the Amigos to Council dated May 21 , 1990, regarding Precise Plan of Street Alignment 89-1 , Coastal Development Permit 89-46, Negative Declaration No. 89-63. She stated that she believed the circulation plan was incorrect. She stated that the Amigos prefer that the eastern end of Seapoint be connected directly to Garfield at the Edwards Street intersection as the existing service road does now and that the Amigos Board of Directors believes the Council should delay action on the item. Ralph Bauer stated he believed Linear Park should be increased in size if possible. He spoke regarding the three parcels that could be purchased through State Federal Grants. The City Administrator reported on the required maintenance responsibilities i for Linear Park. Don Guillaume stated that one of the declarations was that houses on Seapoint were already fixed up for heavy traffic noise and that this was not true. He stated that he believed that the Linear Park would create 30,000 trips a day on Seapoint Avenue and that people would have . to park on the street and would be in and out of the cars on this heavily traveled road. He stated that the original plan was made in 1976 and that the city should restudy the overall street patterns in the area. Don Troy, CARP Chairman and advisory member of Bolsa Chica Coalition, stated that CARP (Citizens Against Rerouting Pacific Coast Highway) was opposed to the street alignment. He stated that he believed the- item should be postponed until the traffic plans are completed. He requested that the City Attorney be asked if the alignment could be approved when it conflicts with the circula- tion plan. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, to continue the open public hearing to July 16, 1990, until after the traffic study. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays , Silva NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Erskine A Page 8 - Council/Agency Minutes - 5/21/90 A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Green, to direct staff to bring back the condition of the opening Hof Seapoint to the various developments within Seacliff with the potential idea of continuing that requirement of the road opening for a minimum of 18 months. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Winchell , Green, Mays, Silva NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Erskine Councilwoman Winchell questioned the grading procedure for the project. (City1) PUBLIC HEARING - ISSUANCE OF REFUNDING MIULTIJAMILY HOUSIN REVENUE - APPROVED - SEABRIDGE VILLA APARTMENTS - CAPE CORAL LANE (330.70) The Mayor anno ced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the fol wing: Approval of the iss nce by the City of Huntington Beach of refunding revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed Twenty-Five Million Dollars ($25,000,000) for the purpose of refundin the outstanding City of Huntington Beach, California, Multifamily Housing Reven a Bonds , 1985 Series A (Seabridge Villa Project) in the aggregate principal am nt of $25,000,000 (the "Prior Bonds") . The Prior Bonds were issued for the pu ose of assisting in the financing of the acqui- sition, construction and deve ment of a multifamily rental housing develop- ment in the City of Huntington B ch (the "Project") . Construction of the Project has be completed. The Project consists of 344 i units and is located at 20251 Cape C al Lane in the City of Huntington Beach, California. The owner of the Project s JMB Institutional Apartment Partner- ship-I , an Illinois limited partnership. Legal notice as provided to the City Clerk Office by staff had been mailed, published, and posted. No communications or itten protests were received on the matter. The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6139 or Council adoption - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTI TON BEACH AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAG REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND BONDS ISSUED TO PROVIDE FINANCING .FOR CONSTRUCTION OF EABRIDGE VILLAS APART- MENTS HOUSING PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DE VERY OF AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, LOAN AGREEMENT, REGULATORY AGREEMENT, OFFICIAL STATEMENT. AND BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS ND APPROVING OTHER RELATED ACTIONS." Pat Spencer, Deputy Director Community Development, presented a taff report. The Mayor declared the public hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being n protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. 65