Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Precise Plan of Street Alignment - Specific Plan 73-1 - Stre
C1 RE01JE81 FOR CITY C p�, ���e.�+�.. C��©eel Date February 23, 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council p Jj}, ct Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate Prepared by: James W. Palin , Director, Development Se21ce. C�•i, Subject: SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE GARFIELG - GOLDENWEST AREA - Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: tr STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In, 1981, the City Council directed staff, by resolution, to prepare a specific plan for the Garfield - Coldenwest area. Staff has re-- evaluated the need for a detailed specific plan for this area and has determined that such a plan would be premature at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION -'ON FEBRUARY 15, ON HOTIGa,' EY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIR,7AHANGIR, ITEM A-21 SPECIF;C PLAN FOR THE GARFIELD - GOLDENWEST AREA - RECO�'MMENDrMG TO 'CITY COUNCIL POSTPONEMENT OF STAFF WORX ON THE PLAN, WAS APPROVED )`VY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Winchell , Porter, Mirjahangir NOES : None RESENT: Higgins, Schumacher ABSTAYN: Erskine RECO MENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council direct staff to postpone work on a specific plan for the Garfield - Goldenwes*_ ?I--ea until appropriate planning issues are vesolved. ANALYSIS : On December 71 .1981 .the City Council ado'p+;ed Resolution No . 5053 (in conjunction with Lund Use Eleinent Amendment No. 62-1) which -stated, among other things, t:.hat. "The existing' Medium Density Residential designation on the 97. 0 , acre area bounded by Goldenwest Street, GarfirlId Avenue, Huntington Street and Clay Avenue: be ,.regained and that staff be directed to prepare a specific plan for said area" . The intent of the specific plan was to delineate appropriate uses for the area on ,r .r RCA March 7, 1983 ` Page 2 a block by block basis while addressing the issues of compatibility wit existing oil operations, consolidation of tl cess and concerns . Staff indicated that work on the aspecificeplan could other planas soon as previous planning commitments had been completed including the Downtown and Ellis - Goldenwest Specific Plans. Staff has re-evaluated the need for a detailed specific plan for the Garfield - Goldenwest area: and has determined that such a plan would be premature at this time . There are a numbe*: of that may have an impact on the Garfield - Goldenwestr area vwh.ich&ues should be resolved before work o» specific development standards is under- taken. The major issues are as follows: I . The future alignment of Gothard Street south of Ellis Aven' tie has not been finalized and may have a substantial impact on circulation and land use in the Garfield - Goldenwest area. - staff is considering alternative alignments for Gothard Street andcwillntly bring these alternatives to thr. Planning Commission during the next amendment to the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . 2. The City is considering including the eastern portion o,`. . the Garfield - Goldenwest area into a Gothard Corridor Redevelopment Project Area for which a redevelopment plan would be prepared , 3. The City Council recently approved a redesignation and rezoning Of a portion of "'he site to Industrial to acUommodate a request by the Carrbro Manufacturing Plant to expand their operations; a specific plan would not be needed for this industrial portion. 4 . The property owners in the Garfield - Goldenwest area have not indicated that they want the City to prerare a specific plan for their properties. In short, there are a number of significant unresolved issues that ma have an impact on the Garfield - Goldenwest area which should be re- Y solved before additional Planning efforts are undertaken for the area . Staff will continue to monitor any City actions that may impact future land uses in the Garfield -- Goldenwest area and to evaluate what special planning efforts by the City, if arty , will be necessary to Insure compatible and coordinated development . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable ALTERNATINT ACTIONS: Direct staff to begin work immediately on a specific plan for the Garfield - Goldenwest area . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Map of Garfield -- Goldenwest hrea 2. Resolution No 5053 JWP s C I s dw 1 /f .If GARFIELD -GOLDENWEST AREA STUDY AREA AtIft t. hun"tol, h dbPCFtMWt. RESOLUTION NO . 5053 . A RESOLUTION OF THE Cilly COUNCIL OF 'PffC C11-y OF HUN INGTON BEACH ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT AMEND- ME."IT NO. 81--2 TO THE CITY ' s GENERAL PLM WifEREAS, the Cit Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires La update and refine the General I'larl #in keep,inq with changi.nc; community needs and objc.-etives ; arld A r;ublic hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment 140 . 81•-2 to the General Clan was held by the 1Manning Commissioll on November 3 , 1981 , and approved for reccanunenclation to the City t'ouncil , and Thereat ter, the City Council , Of ter gi.viticf notice as pre- scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least one public! hearing to consider said Land Use Blemrrit: ?,a . f31 -2 ; and At ,;,iid hearing beforr. tAW Cit}' Council .-:11 persons desiring to be heard on said ai;tencimett L wore flea rd , NOW, THEREFORF: , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Count:i 1 of the City Of hunting Lon Doaach, pu rsti-ant t;v i oils of Ti L•le 7 , Chapter 3, Art: is l(.. 6 of the Cal i fcrn is Governmvn t: Code, con):nenc irig with section 65350, that Lentz Use Element: Amendmelit. jo. 81-2 to the General Plan , cansi:a +piny of t:h"> fol;;ot4ittcs r'lt.attgo.: is hereby adopted : 1 - That a nediwn--h iclli density rosi dent i a l entegory per- mitting up to 25 dwell .ing unit:, I)rr gros,; acre b.. added to the Land Use >rle:nent as worded in Lanel Ur-e Elc.�rn`;;t lu,nendment No. 1 - 2 . 2. That: reference to the size: crit:eri.: ill f~ iqure 3-- 15 of the General Plan not be made when inakinq a finding of consistency in the city ' :; coastal ::one.•. 3 . That all request• .iterng in a Gericral P1an Amendment be forwarded to City Council after review by t:hc 111a1ining Conunission. and that the resolution forwarded to City Council by the Planning Commission plainly set apart those request items recommended for approval from those rc:CMnmendc-d For denial . 40 That the ^xirting Medium--density Residential designa- tion on the 97.0 acre avea bounded by Ooldenweat Street , Cimrrield Avenue , Huntington Street and Clay Avenue be retained and that staff be directed to prepare a specific plan for said area. 5. That 4. 5 acres located on Commodore Circle between Huntington and- Delaware Streets be redesignated from Medium to Medium-high Density Residential with the condition that prior to approval of a tentative tract map and/or conditional use permit for the site, the developer must oubmit a plan acceptable to the city addressing the relocation ok displaced familica . 6 . That one acre on the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Van Buren Street be redesignated from Medium-density Residential to Office Professional. 7 . That 9 . 8 acres located east of Beach Boulevard 1 ,022 feet south of Atlanta Avenue be readesignated from General Commercial and Medium-density Residential to High-density Residential with r ;maximum of 290 units perm'.tted on the site , that any develop- merit, on the site be a gated community; and that the provision of a frontage road parallel to Beach Boulevard be addressed in any site plan for the area. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City or Huntington Beach at a regular meeting tht reof held on the 7 th day of December , 1981 . r" Mayor ATTEST: APPflOVED AS TO DORM : to • +. ad . ' City Clerk '+ City Attorney 2. r REVIEWED A14D APPROVED: ' ' INITIATED AND APPROVED: C. (e•fir-. .� �� . City A m n stra ;or V rector o eve opine Services r No. 5053 „'.' OF CALIFORNIA ity'ty OF ORANGE CITY OF "VrItMON ngACII I , ALICIA M. WENIVORTti, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk or tile. c'ty of Huntington ?each, and ex-Officio C' lark of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the wriale members of the CityCn suer o f sncil of the Cite of Nuntingtdn Reach is seven; .� that the foregoing resolution was Passed and Adopted b stive vote of more than a majority of all the members of acid City aity Council at: N regular • ncil meeting thereof held an the 7th Of December _---- day — ��. 19 81 by the following vote; t AYf;S: Councilmen; MacAllister, Thomas , Pattinson, Finley, bailey, Mandic, Kelly NOt:S: Councilmen; None AIiSEhT: Ccounc it'MCM: None ......... a City Clerk and ex-officto Clerk of the City Council of the city Of Huntington Beach, Crlifnvnia i f REWEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department City Administration Drte Prepared r,, Julx, 1 , 19?9 Backup Materiel Attached 9 Yse No Subject Street Alignment of Redondo Circle S ec.ific Plan 73-1 City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL b Approve n s r�i..ammendeci -f c:17Y Ll:RlC t Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alterrmtive Actions: Statement of Issue : Dan Baker, Attorney at Law, spoke at the Council Meeting of duly 16 , 1979 requesting relief for his client Mr. Lazeo Kovacs, .from the "burden placed. . .by the present proposed alignment of Redondo Circle . " Recommendation : Pay to Richard E. Jimenez , developer, a total lump sum settlement in the amount of $25 , 000. 15 Analysis: Please see the attached memorandum From Michael Zambory, Director of Public Works . Funding Source : Gas Tax Funds t, 73 , -r. i CITV OF HUNTI DH He JiNa INTEII•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION KATNGIM MACH To Bud Belsi-to From Michael Zambory Subject Street Alignment for Redondo Date July 20 , 1979 Circle-Specific Plan 73- 1 At their meeting . July 16 th6 City Council requested the Director of Public Works a11d the Director of Dcvelopment Services to meet with Mr. Richard E. Jimenez, developer, in order to reaolve the claim of excessive costs involving an industrial development on the south side of Talbert Avenue approximately 1 ,230 feet west of Beach Blvd. At 9 : 00 A.M. Thursday, ;July 19, the Director of Public ,Works and' the Director of Development Services met with Mr. Richard E. Jimenex: to analyze Mr. Jimenez at the Cou the excessive costs claimed by ncil meeting' `July 16 and also as expressed in a letter addressed to the City Council from Dan N. Baker, attorney at law, ,',dated June 14, 1979 representing the O%frrer of the property Mr. Lazlo Kovacs. A thorough review was made of the history of the project and of the claimed additional costs , it appears;,that the problem of excessive costs was brought about to sosae extent by error of City employees, by existing ordinance requirements , and by interpretation of older policies of a City Administrator and City Council no longer holding such positions . Following 1 1/2 hours of discussion, debate and analysis, it was agreed that a recommendation be made to the City Council to pay to Richard ' E. Jimenez, developer, a total lumpy sum settlement in the amount of based upon the following: (1) 3,500 seq. ft, of dedicated p iblic right of way in excesn of the half street Section normally required. . . . . . . .$12 , 000 (2) Two stcrm drain catch basins 'and required concrete pipe . . . .$ 6 , 000 (3) Earth'''grading beyond the centerline of dedicated half street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11000 C4) Excessive architect's fee due to Precise Precise Plan of ,X Street Alignment being made known after Completion of architect' s: pinn. . . . . . . . . . . . . �`:.:. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . � 2,000 . sriver, engineerinq required because of Precise Plan of. Street Alignment being made known after initial design of, ro ect was cone ----P j lets, , . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.: $.•'3;pI10 Grand 'Total. .:., . . . . , $25;000 Mr. J1 mends had, itemized .a . liitin . ; r g� df items ';in the "amount; of; $S0,,400 Mhic the felt troAt; hi"s., vieapr int were ,legiti>sstt 'clssrinn Elo�+aver some, of:,the ,.... a is .; , ite�itt involr►+red ::an interpretation: of. a� insl�t thin .City dated .,P,cil,r. 29 1976 f* " ' D"avid D. Rawr a ands:: wiis�oraiedttss n C attachisdl` rt9ardin4, la fty Council the ct�p�► , , Muction gested':t" 'Cit, inluatxial days pent In Ltha't we�a Mr I�wlenda p�'ovi�lit 'as�aistancss `'to ` iussts . evilopers:. thxough of of fahe i roir �p ant cOsti ,by having :this City through:, Cis Tax Memo to Bud Helsito June 20, 1979 Page 2 expenditure construct streets , sanitary sewers, storm drains and water mains which normally would be constructed by the developers themselves. The policy was applied in varying degrees for a short time following its adoption . However , with Prop 13 and the general feeling of the public toward governmental expenditures, it would appear reasonable for the present City Council to reconsider this policy at this time. It is recommended by the Director of Public Works anu" the W rector of Development Services that the City Council accept the negotiated $25, 000 settlement as being fair and equitable, and that this amount be made payable to. .Ri,chard E . Jimenez upon final acceptance of all offsite improvements involving this development. It is further recommended that the City Council authorize payment of the S25 , 000 from the City' s Gas Tax Fund . r �� .. 4ch 1 Zamb� Director o P lic s MZ : jy Attach. p � C E I V E Jul 201975 ., t OF M- 1M G101 MN N'115'111MOS fE OM CITY CIF Hun T BEA ( H J/ DEPARTMENT OF DEV60PMENT 520WEx BU11.01NG DIVIVON(710535-5241 ( PLANNING D`►VIIZION 171410311-5271 � •jX R. 0. Box 100, HUNTINOTWJ BEACH. CALIFORNIA nW TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: Names W. Palin, Department of Development Services DATE : July 121 1979 SUBJECT: ATTACHED LETTER DATED JUNE 14 , 1979 III RE: STREE'' ALIGNMENT OF REDONDO CIRCLE - SPECIFIC PLAN 73-1 Attached herewith is a letter from-Dan N. Baker, Attorney at Law, in which he has requested to address the City Council on the matter of street improvements along his client' s weal-,er•ly property line at Talbert Avenue and Redondo Circle. Events as set forth by Mr. Baker in his letter are ccrrect. This department has no explanation of why , the planned alignment1, 1.or Redondo Circle was missed on the originally approved `AR 76-5_9 . Mr. Kovacs , the property owner, - svbsevuently revise] his plan and resubmitted it -for approval , and at that time it was' discovered that .• the original approval had not taken the street alignment into con-sideration. There has been much delay because of this prior over- sight and, as stated by Mr. Baker, the majority of the street is required to be dedicated from his client 's property. The street alignment and improvement will directly benefit the City 's holdings to the south of the subject industrial development. Because of that beneficial, effect to,•the value of the City-owned:property, as well as the delay a'nd expense caused by the prior oversight and the majority dedication required from this property, the Department of Pavelopment Services in our reviews with the representatives of the applicant haR�recommencled that he pursue with the City Council some. possihz le rellei f from the street improvements as currently required. (As_a side isoi�'e, when it was determined that the street was reanired to 4-ta` •i1-ndi.cated and improved additional grading was necessary upon Mr. Kovaiis '• property..,because of street grade. The surplus earth from tniu grading has been given to the City to -partially mitigate the depression caused through the construction of the Taylor Street park site. ) Additional'`r�vialans;,have 1. been 'necessary on Mr'. Xovacs' ii.te,,plan;.: because of the dedication of approximately 35 feet of- the 45-foot industrial street section from his property. These revisions i+dre necessary to accommodate, the required.,public . street dedication. is* "11 as onsite circulation, building--setbacks, and landscaping . ih1so' . `?w.•' Tibrkstanimp rovements had been submitterd to the Department of ,Pi�tbli.o pf in checked for the `original entitlements these iisproviewnta had not''inc.r•:"porated the necessary design , for the . intersection of Redo:,ido Circle and Talbert Avenue. In'. & discusay,cn with they applicant .t Page 2 • we were informed that all. of these items (i.e. , street dedication and improvements , revised street improvement plans , additional grading and delays) have cost more than $40, 000. In our meetings with the *A property owner subsequent to his filing his revised plans , he inquired whether the City would pay for any of his additional costs required for ultimate development . At that time, the staff informed Mr. Kovacs i, of the policy previously adopted by the City Council to assist where ever feasible in offsite improvements for industrial and commiarcial development within the City. Pursuant to that policy, Mr . Baker ' s letter is before you for review. We do not feel that the City Council ' s concurrence for participation for a portion of the offsite improvements for this development would be setting a precedent , as the Council on a number of occasions has agreed to street improvements where dedication has been granted by a property owner. The existing portion of Redondo Circle was cony tructed with participation by the City , as well as a number of additional streets where Public Works could arrange for street improvements in exchange for dedication of right-of-way. RECOMMENDATION: In view of the above-mentioned fact: , the Department of Development Services recommends that the City Council pursue one of the following suggested actions : 1 . Approve in concept the participation with the property owner cor partial reimbursement for the street improvements as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on Administrative Review 79-57 , and request the developer to submit to the Department of Public Works calculations on quantities and costs for these additional street. improvements . 2. Approve in concept the costs of street improvements for the north/south leg of Redondo Circle as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on Administrative Review 79-57 and require that that developer submit to the Department of Public Works quantities and coasts for such construction and grant reimbursement in exchange for the street right-of-way dedication . ALTERNATIVE ACTION : Reject the request to participate in the additional street improvements as required on this development pursuant to the Hoard of zoning Adjustments ' action or. Administrative Review No. 79--57. Should the Council need additional info;:matien, the staff will be pre- pared to discuss this item with you at your July 16 , 1979 meeting. R pectfully s itted, 4 James W. , Palin, Director Department of Development Services JWPsdf Jlttached s lk{fitter dated Tune 14 , 1979 r`�AN N. BAKER ATiORNCY AT LAW (��j �/ � � 1 'C.� ©//��^v''+ *UITt �Op. LIMNtalle *U1101NG P1 A;�r IP(I IP f. 1400 NOR1N HANNON GOUL[VA11n 1 ' IULLCRTOh,CALI/fTRNIA VJG35 T[l[�MOM, I>'1�) •11.11]] ) t' I• June 14 , 1979 P. d. flow 190 1lttnNngro+t Or,)ch,CA 92648 Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St . , Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: Floyd Belsito City Administrator Re: Proposed Street Alignment of Redondo Circle Specific Plan 73-1 Dear Mr. Belsito= The undersigned represents M.r . Lazlo Kovacs , the owner of property located on the south side of Talbert Avenue, approximately 1730 feet west of Beach Blvd . , in your City . ' The purpose of this letter is to request a hearing before the City Council at the earliest date possible. i We would seek , at that hearing, relief from the tremendous burden placed upon my client by the present proposed alignment of Redondo Circle. That alignment will parallel the western property line of my client' s property and take approximately 45 feet from his property. It is xny undo►-standing that the City Council has adopted a policy whereby in commercial and/or industrial areas of the City, assistance will be tendered to the propert;► owner where off--site improvements will work an extreme hardship on the property owner or some dispro- portionate sharing of the burden is mandated among adjoining property owners . The factual events in this particular case certainly warrant the City 's application of that policy to this property owner. As background for your consideration I would offer the following .- On the 27th day of July , 1918 , a site plan, AR 78 59 was approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of your City whereby my client 1 ' � 6 DAN N. BAKER `~ �,�11I ! ..�. --� . AftaRN[Y AT LAW ' �I• •��//���r1©'7 �14 Witt 400, 1CAINCROW OulthINO P�f�l ��•I�;U r)r-. T. 0*00 NOR1N WPOOR SOUL(VAnO 1 j rULLCRtON,CAL1V0RN4A 00035 J UPS fttLCPNONt{ 0141 ON-1138 June 14 , 1979 P. a. nox l90 11,:nanGtoll 13racIl, CA URE Honorable City Council City of NLr.tington Beach 2000 Main St. , Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: Floyd Selsito City Administrator Re: Proposed Street Alignn,snt of. Redondo Circle Specific Plan 73-1 Dear Mr. Hels ito : The undersigned represents fir . LazA10 Kovacs , the owner of property located on the south side of Talbert Avenue, approximately 1230 feet west of Beach Blvd . , in your City . The purpose of this letter is to request a hearing before the City Council at the earliest date possible . We would seek , at that hearing, relief from 'the tremendous burden placed upon_ my client by the present proposed alignment of Redondo Circle. That alignment will parallel the western property line of my client' s property and take apprcximately 45 1eet from his property. It is my understanding that the City Council, has adopted a policy whereby in commercial and/or industrial areas of the City, assistance will be tendered to the property owner whPr ::� off--.site improvements will work an extreme hardship on the properly owner or some dispro- portionate sharing of the burden is mandated among adjoining property owners . The factual events in this particular case certainly warrant the Ci.ty 's application of that policy to this property owner. As background for your consideration I would offer the following : on the 27tch clay of Julyt 1978 , a site plan, AR, 78 99 was approyod by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of your City wheri?by my client Honorable City Council `! June 14 , 1979 Attn: Floyd Selsit Page 2 . would constreact certain industrial buildings on his property pursuant to that plan. No notice of the requirements of Specific Plan 73-1 as revised was given to my client and but for a decision to change contractors, permits would have been pulled and the project built . All without an), notice of or requirements for street improvements on the proposed Redondo Circle . When the owner made application in AR 79-57 to modify the Site Plan in preparac.ion for actual corls;truetion, the City for the first time notified the owner that Specific: Plan 73-1 would have an effect on his proposed development. Subsequent facts reveal that statement to be the major understatement of the year. The proposed street will take approximately 3/4 of its width from my client 's property and because the westerly property is already developed only approximately 1/4 of the width will come from that property. That fact alone is a major disproportioning of the burden of improvement in that obviously my client would be faced with upwards of 3/4 of the cost of the street . Since at the time the westerly property was developed no provision for the street was contemplated , the westerly property owner was not required to bond or guarantee for street improvements . In addition , our preliminary engineering studies indicate that the adjacent property owner has constructed a block wall which encroaches on the City ' s proposed right of way and that the wall ' s footing are as much as 3-1/2 feet higher than the top of the proposed curb of the west side of the street , indicating an excessive change in grade from the property as it now stand: and the elevation of the finished street. Further, the City ' s Public Works Department has indicated a n". d for storm drainage facilities down this street but are unable at this time to provide the details of their prijected needs or any specific engineering requirements . My client is now in a position where he must proceed with all speed to develop or the project will become economically infeasible. We have already obtained a conditional exception t-o deal with the encroachment prob;ems created by the sudden awareness of the proposed street. I do request from you a hearing before the City Council at the Whorable City Council Attn: Floyd Dalsit Page. 3 earliest possible date so that we may plead our case to that body and somehow overcome the tremendous problems that have now arisen in the path of this project . Please advise me at your earliest opportunity. Very truly yours, DAN N. BAKER DNa:pd cc : Lazlo Kovacs Richard E. Jimenez •. James W. Palin A's CITV CW HWITINoTON WWW14 t;h 7 6- 5b • wr COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION ' 1M711/K,1pM rKM , • To Ilonorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members Stobject GAS TAX PROJECT pace April 23 , 1976 ( INDUSTRIAL PARK) - Construction on arterial highways in industrial areas has been per - � formed in the last by the City ' s use ; of Gas Tax Funds A project presently underway is on Gothard Street from Warner Avenue to Ell is Avenue consisting of storm drains , water mains , sanitary sewers and street wideiiin The total cost of this project. will account to approximately 11681 , 803 . 81 financed from Gas Tax Fund . Sewer Fund , Water Fund , Drainage Fund and an Economic Development Administration ' Grant of $1759000 . Because of the possibility of industrial davelopment in the I.usk Ind►istrial Park , it has bern suggested that the City Imcnedint4ly Icro- ceed with a project to complete the street work on Springdale Street , Graham Street , 8oisa Avenue and McFadden Avenue adjacent to the vacant industrial property . The cost would be approximately $348 , 972 and can • be financed with Gas Tax Funds . This project will not jeopardize .any project plan for the next 12 months. If this proposal meets with the City Council ' s approval , aphroprinte action would be to authorize the Departmcnt of Public Word's to prepare the plains and specifications and to authorize advertising of bids . Rli;nMhlf:Nt)AT 1 ON Apprnve the proposed Gacs 'fax Project in the industrial area and authorize the Depacrtme'nt of Public Works to prepare the plans and specifications and to authorize aJver* isement for bids . Respectfully submitted , David 1) . Rowlan s City Administrator UUK/i:CA :p Aj CITY OF L1� f T�?N H I�iG BEACH CA 76- 56A ' COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION to llonornble Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Hembers Subject GAS 'TAX PROJECT Date April 29 , 1976 ( INIIUSi'RIA1. PARK) This CA is a st.-ppleme.'nt to CA 76- 56 which was deferred from the '0 April 26th Counc i 1 meeting . The City C'oitnc i 1 has on severed occasions expressed n desire for stnft to work closely with site owners and developers of cominerciul and indus- trial property in or kler to establish a stronger tax b••tse.'. Cooperation on the p;trt of the City m,ty lie ac:compli %hed by expeditiously processing the }Mans through thv Various City departments and by reducing off-site improvement costs such as streets , sanitary sct+ers , storm drains and water mains which would normally be borne by the developers . The staff is currently reevaluating the Procedures by which plank can , he more of fcctivcly IIrucesxr�l Etna will he til)ntittinF a recommendation as a hart of the rewrite of M%, ision 9 ( Planning and Zoning ) . With regard to off- site and other improvement costs , the City may be ah1v to provide ,a -. sistatncc throtigh the l " t' iut► of 11111) lic Work% i mprovemen t s to ac t ua l sieve l olttnent , t he reby reduc i ng Elie s i to prepa r- ation costs . RGCOA MENDAT 1 ON Adopt this policy and .authorize staff to proceed accordingly. Respect fill ly submitted , � & M--- 11,avid 1) . Rowlands ' • City Administrator DIM : 1) ' . City of Huntington Beach i •` ' ' P.O. Box I" CALIFORNIA 92646 ovi-wE oi. i*m. CITY ADMINISTRATOR May 19 , 1976 • Huntington Beach Industrial Park r P. 0. Box 2140 Newport Beach, California 92663 Attention: Mr. David W. Ariss, Vice President Gentlemen: Thit• letter is to serve as we itLmn confirmation of items of general agreement. as to areas of responsibility for providfng improvements on the Property located north of McFadden Avenue between Springdale Street and Graham Street. `,his matter has been discussed with the City Council and they have cnncurred with this approach. Please , refer to a copy of the attached City Council Minutes. The City Council. has reprior. i f.i zed Gas Tax Projects to establish a project Ln the aforementioned property . Said project will provide for the following : 1 . Engineering - The Ilroje ^t will .include preparation of plans to construct street improvements on Springdale Street, McFadden Avenue, and Graham Street. 2 . Street Improvements - The Project will provide for construction of all street: improvements as required by the improvement plans for .9pringdale Street, McFadden Avenue , and Graham Street. Siaewalks will. not 1.^ included as a part- of this construction on the east side of Grahan and the north ,;i de of McFadden , but �• will be worked out as a requirvinen ta development of the property abu;:t ing the two streets . The City will, consider amodification to the standard sidew'i requirements and/or a landscape belt in lieu of th` sidewalk requirements 3 . Street Lights - The Project will include: street lights on • Springdale Street,' McFadden Avenue , and Graham Street:. 4 . Median Divider - rmprovements do not Include .installation of a landscaped median divider on Springdale Street and McFadden Avenue. The City will not require the developer of the adjacent parcel to install this improvement . Telepbont (T 13) 536•5201 • ' •�, Page 2 The •stan' dard City street tree requirement for 20" box trees will not be included as a part or the Gas Tax Project, but will be worked out as a conditiun of development of the adjacent property . The City will + consider allowing the street tree requirement to be incorporated as a part of the Landscape requirement of adjacent property . Insofar as storm drains are concerned , the City of Huntington Beach requests that. the Huntington Beach Industrial Park construct the :storm drain system required for the development of Springdale Streete " McFadden Avenue , and Graham Street . Since this is a Master Planned Project , the cost of the drainage facility will be applied as credit 0 toward payment of drainage fees . The City will not require installation of a water line on Springdale Street . The developer of ttte property west of and contiguous to Springdale Street will he permitted to "hot tap" as necessary the existing 36" line in Springdale Street at the time the property is developed . It will be the responsibility of the developer to provide fire hydrants (approximately 4 ) on Graham Street as required by the Fire Department. There is no requirement nor is there a need for the Huntington Beach Industrial Park to instill an identification monument or to provide a separate landscape area at the northwest corner of Springdale Street ' and McFadden Avenue to identify the industrial park . Huntington dear_h Industrial Purl; w.tll be responsible for processing the various parcel maps , tentative parcel snaps , preparation of storm drain plans and installation of master storm drains . Additionally , Huntington beach Industrial Park will bra responsible for all fees and assessments normally charged by the City for industrial development. It should be clearly understood by all parties that the reprioritizing of the Gas Tax Project to move this project up higher on the priority list was done to enhance the desirability of this site for the Weiser Lock Company . Should the Weiser Lock transaction with the Huntington Beach Industrial Part: not be fulfilled , the improvements outlined herein will be subject to further review which may postpone such improvements . The contents of this letter constitute a statement of applicable City policy and should not be construed as bestowing upon any person or organi-atxon any benefit or duty not otherwise provided by law. Yours very truly , . �� Beli' 'H . E. Flartge Floydito birector of 'Public rks Acti y ity Administrator Reviewed by ity Attorney R chard Harlow Director of Planning and Environmental. Hesources Assin nt City At ney r tu.1 GRAND �'tit/itc�t C'1«i�t>, t, i•ii j► w+l i riIsl . INMI&yluli Ovack, Vsli'uti.i.f �. MMS"C'Wirder called Uw tagwtar++�+�±�� • harttny of the City VIP411 :tl 1, „l 11... lily 61 Huntington Dosch to atiMr at 1/ efi /N. 111/•r.4 L1 t i31iLt. tatthn••_ Cis_ Q`�� ■��ar� r�r► w _ ! • lip /wart �w���—• r..rw row.tiMww�r t • ALt.••ul t leOss • •r•/•••&ISS.•••r sees 62m69 009696e660som@@ ' �AS TAX _PWDJtCT - INpUMLAL FAXX - (CA yLS.il )At1� p ICA 76-SbA1 The Clty Clark presented a communication from the City Adainlatrato; dated April 23, 1976, recolmstendtng thAt the City immediately proceed with a project to caplets the street work on Springdale Street. Graham Strest, Bola& Avenue and McFadden Avenue t+hich could be financed with Gas Tax funds. A supplemental City Administrator r'onminlcation dated April 29, 1976 was also revisented to Cowell recesswndinq that that adapt a POLICY whereby the City, in regard to oft'-Mite and other Improvement ;'Oats, WAY be able tS provide assistance through the installatloh of Public Works Imgtcovaeenta to actual developoent, thereby reducing the elm preparation costs. , A notion was wade by Councitnan Shankwn to approve the proposed i4s Tax Pr+e2oet ih the Industrial Argo; authorize the Director of Public Works to prepare the plans and ' specifications and advertlas for bids and further. adopt the recommended policy In regard to off-sits and other irprovesmnt costs. TM motion was passed by tlla tolLawlnq • veto i AVC31 Bartlett, Pattin"n, Coon. Gibbs. Siebert, ihenkman, Mleder "Oct t None ABtzlrf t Mona On no/ion byJ4Lt�•/..w�� ..::s:"�.I.1�� kite 104fular aaPLlny of tlwy Utt Ctwncil of Uiv City et 11untinotun utach Adhuurned at _ �� � ;• tu��-, -fir !_ L%2 Jt 7_00 It- It. in the-r�l t IN- mutto/s was passed dy the following vwte t Ards: ..�LLLfIJa-•latti>3ana. CoeA. r_t�tay.....31AhatL..s wha•n_ 1�f1&Aarr.�.��.��.. HUI'S t _yp AitlClr'f t Altcla M. Mantwotthw.� City Clark and on-Ott let* L1at► of t.irs City' Council 0 the `ity AM AT of Muntington leach/ CalLibrNla Ali�to M. MaM,tyycth WrILatt____�N. MLI �„ �„ • City Clerk hearer • SI ATV a' CA1.1111A111A CItMItty of orsn�o ) US City of 11witinrtoo roach) 1, ALICM 14. ur.M7wolt @ tlw dvJr elactad and 4ualifled City Clark Of thi.• Clto til 11wit iw•Ilor1 "ch, Califeehla, do horaby certlty that Use a&2w* end feregring Is a trwk. eMal Iarrect Usteoment of Action of the City COW411 of eaid Mty .%t %swlr tey.ilar wetial hold do the_._Mt0L._1My of +maw wltew'Ar. My- hilwd MA befl of lhwe bald Clty of Nrnt/Mtow Nscit this UW.AJAJL,rev Of r; Liar ��.,�,�, 1g.�,..• ,�(. City Clark am t1a•r malt+ CI-Irk ' et ttmv rail Availed .•: tote l'Ity �� if t1ea+111r �.m1r1s>raad �` 11A —%dA CITY ' Q� . Suerr►itted by ,,Flow!.G,_ eex ito ppe,t ,City J►dw ni st op __...... ._,_ Dees I r C,j to 9 Bm*u McAwiei x Y" No epa+n .��l.Y....1��.. _.....,_... • ..�.., A tt+Mtte4 Subject Uest- Ali n"nt, Redondo Circle_ Specific Plan City Administrator's Comment= Approve as recommended 5tatte'ram of 100, Reconwrwr tion,Analysis, Funding Source.Ahwr*IW Actions: �✓ Statement of Issue: Dan Baker, Attorney at Law, spoke at the Council !Meeting of July 16 , 1979 requesting relief for his client, Mr. Lazeo Kovacs, from the "burden placed. .by the present proposed alignment of Redondo Circle. " Recamendation : Pay to Richard E. Jimenes , developer, a total lump sum ■ettlawsnt in the amount of $25 ,000. Ana sis: Please see the attached memorAndum from Michael Lambory, Director of Public works . rundin2 Source: Can Tax Funds 40 r maim 116�_g CITV CW �a,tss �"H iNTE11-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION M 14 I P%C}'(lq1 M 41 11 T4, Rud Belnito From Michael Zambory Subject Street Alignment for Redondo Dote July 20 , 1979 Circle-Specific Plan 73•-1 At their meeting July 16 the City Council requepted the Director of Public Works and the Director of Development. Serviced to reset with Mr. Richard E. Jimenez, developer, in order to resolve the clain of excessive costs involving an industrial development on the south ei.de of Talbert Avenue approxim"-,tely 1 ,230 feat Kent of Beach Blvd . At 9 : 00 A.M. Thursdayo July 19, the Director kif Public Iforks and the Director of Development Services met with Mr. Richard E. Jimnez to analyze the excessive coats claimed by Mr. Jimenez at the Council meting July 16 and also as expressed in a letter addressed to the City Council from Dan N. Baker, attorney at law, dated June 14 , 1979 representing the owner of the property Mr. Lazlo Kovacs . A thorough review was trade of the history of the pro jerA and. of the claimbd additional costs. It appears that tho problem of excessive costs was brought about to some extent by error of City employees , by existing ordinance requirements, and by interpretation of older polic:iet of a City Administrator and City Council no longer holding such positions . Following 11/2 hours of discussion, debut® and analysis, it was agreed that a recotrntenda tion be nade to the City Council to pay to Richard E. Jimenez , developer, a total lump sum stttle>ment in the amount of $25, 000 , based upon the following : (1) 71,1500 sq. ft . of dedicated public right of way in excess of the half street acction normally required . . . . . . . . $128000 (2) Two storm drain catch basins ana required concrete pipe. . . .$ 80000 0) Earth grading beyond the centerline of dedicated half street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 14, 000 (4) Excessive architect 's fee due to Precise precise Plan of Street Alignment being suede mown after completion of a r c h i t e c t 'e p 1 an. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�6 a_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .S 2 , 0 0 0 ( 5) Sxcessive engineering required because of Precise Plan of Street Alignment being trade known after initial design of project was ca+rplete. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 21000 Grand Total . . . . . . . .$25 ,000 Mr . Jivwnez had itemized a listing of items in the amount of. $50,000 which he felt from his viewpoint were legitivA a claitas against the City. However,, sown of the items involved an .interpretation of a memorandum dated April 29, 19.76 from David q. Rowlands to the. City Council (copy attached) regarding industrial development. In that smaso Mr. RovI ends suggested the City providt assistance to industrial developers through a reduction of offs to inprrovwant coats by having the City through Gas Tax �r Memo to Bud Belsito June 20, 1979 Page 2 0 expenditure construct streets, sanitary sewers, s + -,rn drains and water taaii.s which normally would be constructed by the +i:.vo.lopers themse 1 va n . The policy was applied in varying degrees tor a •nc�rt time f.ol lowitI f tr adoption. However# with Prop 13 and the general feeling of the piiW i:c: toward governmental expenditures , it would appear ireasonabie for the present City Council to reconsider this policy ;4t t�hi• time. It is recommended by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Development Services that the City Council accept the negotiated $25,000 settlement as being fair and equitable, and that this amount be made payable to Richard. L. Jimenez upon final acceptance of all offeite improveaants involving this development . it is fuxther recaes nded that the City Council authorize payment of the $250000 from the City' s Gas Tax rund. c ae Director :VP tic s M7, : jy 1 Attach. pCEIVE i +� ( 1 ?Y OF jiunT1n*GT0f1 , BEACH DEMRTA�IN�iT CW IWVEIQ!►Ai11NT SEA P.0.am I ft MMY'r11OTM MACH.c.AUP011 "Mild TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator PRom: James W. Paling, Department of Development Services DATE: July 12, 1979 SUBJECT: AWACHRD LETTER DATED JUKE 14 , 1979 IN RE: STREET ALICr1MENT OF REl)ONDO CIRCLE - SPECIFIC PLAN 7 3-1 Attached herewith is a letter from Dan N. Baker, attorney at Law, in which he has requested to address the City Council on the matter of street improvements along his client's westerly property line at Talbert Avenue and Redondo Circle . Events as set forth by Mr. Baker in his letter are correct. This department has no explanation of why the planned alignment for Redondo Circle was missed on the originally approved AR 70-59. Mr. Kovacs, the property owner, subsequently revised his plan and resubmitted it for approval, and at that time it was discovered that the original approval had not taken the street alignment into con.- sideration. There has been much delay because of this prior over- sight and , as stated by Mr. Baker , the majority of t:he street is required to be dedicated from his client' s property. The street alignment and improvement will directly benefit tho city's holdings to the south of the subject industrial development. Because of that beneficial effect to the value of the City-owned property, as well as the delay and expensd caused by the prior overnight and the majority dedication required from this property, the Deps.rtment of Development Services in our raviews with the representatf,ves of the applicant has recamended that he pursue with the City Council some possible relief from the street improvements as currently required. (As aside issue , when it was determined that the street was required to be dedicated and improved additional grading was necessary upon Mr. Kovacs' property because of street grade. The surplus earth frotx this grading has been given to the City to partially mitigate the depression esused through this construction of the Taylor Street park site. ) Rddit:onah revisions have been necessary on Mr. Kovaca' ■itis plan b4caume of the dedication of approximately 35 feet .of the 45-foot industrial street section frcxa his property. Theme rev sfons, were necessary to acgomewdate the required public street dsdiowtion as well as onmite circulation, building setbacks, and landscspitV. Altai street improves nts had been submitted to the Department of. Public Works and plan hecked for the original entitlement] these Awrava eats Padondd Circld nd Talbert Avenue. In a discussion withth• `ap� U'dal n had not inro ate�'i the necessary design--nor, the i�tae ,.it �,: of K Page " we were informed that all of these items (i .e. , street dodlcati and improvementm, revised street improvement hl ana l additional griid i and, delays) have, cost more that. $40, 000. in our meetings with thi3 property owner subsequent to his filing his revised plans, he inglui reu whether the City would pay for any of his Additional costs_ required for ultimate development. At that time , the staff informed Kr. Kovacs of the policy previously adopted by the City Council to assist where- ever feasible in offsite improvements for industrial and comercial development within the City. Pursuant to that policy, Mr. dak@V' s letter is before you for review. We do not feel that the City Council 's concurrence for participation for a portion of the offaite improvements for this development wiyuld be setting a precedent, an the Council on a nuneber of occasions has agreed to street improvements where deification has been granted by a property owner. The existing portion of Redondo Circle was constructed { with participation by the Citye are well as a num!Per of additional streets where Public Works could arrange for street improvements in exchange for dedication of right-of-way. RUCO MENDATION: In view of the above-mentioned facts, the Department of Development Services recommends that the City Council pursue one of the following suggested acticma : 1. Approve in concept the participation with the property owner for partial reimbursement OAor the street improvemente as required by �y ! the Bc:ard of Zoning kl justiients on Administrative Review 79-57 and request the developerP to submit to the Department of Public Works calculations on quantities and costs for these additional street improvements . 2. Approve in conr-ept the costs of street improvements for this north/south leg of Redondo Circle as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments] on PAministrative Review 79-57 and require that the developer submit to the Department of Public Worku quantities and costs for such construction and grant reimbursement in exchange for the street right-of-way dedication. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reject the requeat: to participate in the additional street improvements as required on this development pursuant to the Board of Zoning, Adjustments ' action on Administrative Review No. 79-57. Should the Council need additional information, they staff will be pro- pared to discuss this item with you at your July 16, 1979 meeting. R pectfully .. • tt:ed, Rah James. M. &Lin, Director Depirt ant. of Developw*nt Services JWP:df 1lttac:hed.s Litter dated June 14 , 1979 • DAN fV s.7AKEN �" 1 .1 ..1t •, .� A1 1 0111111 / w1 LAW •VIf� ./)f1. .lA1N[A.1 gullln,,.. 1 { fl ,I-•w"la, (I"Pr, NUO Paoli," maimean •auto Y•1111 ';; ru«�hraM,c�urawllw a�w�s ,J(it'� ��f,/IMp•Yt 1.1.1 •II•IIY� June 14 , 1979 P. 0. 1101r 11in' nrtai atax" f1, CA Omm Honorable City Council -City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main :t. , Huntington Hsach, CAI 92648 Attn : Floyd Belsito City Administrator Re : Proposed Street Al igrur4ent of Redondo Cire j Specific Flan 73-1 Dear Mr. Belsito : Who undersigned represents Mr . Lazlo Ylovacs , the owner of property located on the south side of Talbert Avenue, Approximately 1230 feet f west of Beach Blvd. , in your City . f The purpose of this letter is to request a► hearing before the City Council at the earliest date possible. i we would seek, at that hearing , relief from the tremendous burden placed upon my client by the present proposed alignment of Redondo Circle. That alignment will parallel the weatern property lint of my client 's property and take approximately 45 feet from his property. It is my understanding that the City Council hrzs adoptod a policy whereby in commercial and/or industrial areas of the City, assistance will be tendered to the property owner whire off-site improvements will work an extreme hardship on the property owner or some dispro- portionate sharing of the burden is ram ndated among adjoining property owners. The factual events in this particular case certainly warrant the City'e application of that policy to this property owner. '4s background for your ronsideratio'n I would offer the followings On the 21th day of July, 1978 , a site plan , AR 78 59 was approvad by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of your City whereby gay client Honorable City Cowl June 14 , 1979 Attn: Floyd Bel!sit Page 2 would ;'construct -certain industrial buildings on I,is property pursuant to that plan. No notice of the requirements of Specific Plan 73--1 as, revised was (riven to my client and but for a decision to change con�Xactors , permits would have been pulled and the project built. All without any 'notice of or requirements for street improves*nts on the proposed Redondo Circle. When the oviner made application in AR 79-57 to modify the Site Plan in preparation for actual construction t the City for the first time notified the owner that specific Plan 7 3-1 would have an effect on his proposed development. Subsequent Facts reveal that statement to be the major understatement of the year. The proposed street will take approximately 3/4 of its width from my client 's property and because the westerly property is already developed only approximately 1/4 of the width will come froin that property. That fact alone is a ma or disproportionind of the burden of improvement in that obviously my client would be faced with upwards of 3/4 of the cost of the street. Since at the time the westerly property was developed no provision for the street was contemplated , the westerly property owner. was not �'-'. required to bond or guarantee for street improvements . In addition , our preliminary engineering studies indicate that the: adjacent property owner has constructed a block wall which en6roa ches on the City' s proposed right of way and that the wall ' s footing are as much as 3-1/2 feet higher than the top of the proposed curb of the west side of the street , indictating an excessLve change in grade from the property as it now stands and the elevation of the finished street. Further, the City ' s Public Works tbepartment has indicated a need for storm drainage facilities down this street but are unable at this time to provide the details of their projected needs or any specific engineering requirements . , My client is now in a position where he must prc..tieed with all speed to develop or the project will become economically infeasible . We have already obtained a conditional exception to deal with the encroachment problems created by the sudden awareness of the proptrre+d street. I do request from you a hearing before the City Council at the li` Honorable City` Council A~t n: ':41oyd Belsit hays. a earliest' possible date so that we may plead our, case to that boy ` and somhow overcome the tremendous problems that have now arisen In the path of this project. Please advise me at your earliest opportunity . Very truly yours, DAN N. BAKER DNB:pd cc: Lazlo Kovacs Richard E. Jimenez ` •- "'amen W. Palin 01TY CW Nura • COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION ? Mh NNW 0 To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members Sut�tMct GAS ;TAX PROJECT Date April 23 , 1976 ( INIJusTRIAL PARK) • Construction on arterial highways in industrial areas has been per - 1 formed in the past by the tri ty ' s uselof Gas Tax Funds , A project presently underway is on Gothard Street from Wanner Avenue to Ellis Avenue consistin; of storm drains , water mains . sanitary sewers and street widen,in The total cost of this project. will amount to approximately 681 , 803 . 81 financed from Cars Tax Fund , Sewer fund , Water Fund , Drainage Fund and an Economic Development Administration Grant of $175 , 000 . Because of the rossihility of industrial develop ent in the busk Industrial Park , it has been suggested that the City Immediately pro - ceed with ;a project to complete the street work on Springdale Street , Graham Street , Dolsa Avenue and Mcl'-sdaen Avenue adjacent to the vacant industrial property . The cost mould be approximately $343 , 972 and catn he financed with 'Gas Tax Funds . •' This rrrject will not jeopardize any project plan for the next 12 months . if this proposal meets with the City CounciI ' s approval , arproprinte action would be to authorize the Department of 11ut,lic Works to prepare the plans and specifications and to authorize advcrtising of bids . RECOMMENUAT ION Ppprove the proposed Gas Tax project in the industrial area and authorize . the Ite.►p;artmelit of Public Works to prepare the plans and specifications and to authurize advertisement for aids . Respectfully submitted , X9 Uuv id Rowlan s City Administrator ' UUk/ r(�H : p • r ., ci* of Hurd rrl ,mum mi"cN CA 76 - 56A PIN COUNCIL ADMINISTNATON COMMUNICATION lit%I Mot,of V%14 4906 1n lion ornb' lo Mayor and Frtm City Administrator C i t y Couil c i f Memhe r s Subject CAS TAX PROJECT Date April 19 , 1976 ( iND(ISTRIA1• LARK) This CA is n supplement to CA 76 - 56 which was deferred from the April 26th Council meeting . The City Coate: i 1 ha.r. on several occns ion% expressed n desire for stri f f to work closely with the owners and developers of rumntercial and indua - trial property in order to establish :a stronger tax base. Cooperation,. on the part of the City mc)y he ac:compl i flied by expelll tfausly pr'ocessinK ' the Plans through tht! various City departments and by reducing off- site Improvement costs Such as streets , sanitary sewers , storm drains and water mains which would normally be borne by the developers . The staff is cicrrently ri-evaluating the procedures by which Mains can be More effectively processed arid will lie submitting a recommendation as a part of the rewrite of Division 9 ( I'lanning and Zoning) . • With regaud to oVf - site anti other i ►nitruvelitent cotits , the City may be able to provitiv assistance through the installatiutt of Public lurks ; rL.f. imlirovcmc•nts to 1ic [ItJj development , tli��rcl�y redticin� tltc� aitt` 1troltar- ation costs . RECOMMENDATION Adopt this policy and authorize staff to proceed accordingly. I(espect fuI ly Iubmitted , Davit! l) • Rot lands City Administrator J 1 '; City of Huntington Beach .� _ ! •,� P.O. sox Iso CALIFORNIA $OEM OFFICE O1: THE CITY ADMINISTRATOk May 19, 1976 Huntington Beach Industrial. Park P. 0. Box 2140 Newport Beach, California 92663 Attention: Mr. David W. Ariss, Vice President Gentlemen: This letter is to serve as written runfirmation of items of general agreement as to areas of responsibility for providing improvements on the property located north of McFadden Avenue between Springdale Street and Graham Street . Thin matter has been discussed with the City Council and they have concurred with this approach. Please . refer to a copy of the attached City council Minutes. The City Council has reprioritized Gas Tax Projects to establish ,a project oft the aforementioned property. Said project will. provide for the following : 1 . Encginuerinc - They Project will include !:reparation of plans to construct street improvements on Springdale Street, McFadden Avenue , and Graham Street . 2 . Street Improvements - The Project: will }provide for construction of ,I i l street improvements as required by the improvement plans , for .Springdale Street, Mcf'aciden Avenue , and Graham Street. Sidewalks will not be included as a part of this construction on the east side of Graham and the north side of McFadden , but will be worked out as a requirement development of the property abutting the two streets . Tt:a City will consider a modification to the standard sidewa requirements and/or a landscape belt in lieu of the sidewalk requirement 3. Strec-t I.i_�hts - The Project will include street lights can • Springdale Street ,0I4cFadden Avenue, and Graham Street. 4 . Median Divide:: - Improvements do not include installation of a landscaped median divider on Spr .ngdalr. Street and McFadden Avenue. The C ; ty will not rrgttire '-the developer of the adjacent parce ., to install this improvement . u& 1� r Ttlepbaor (714) 5J6•5J01 Page 2 The standard City street tree reclitirement for ;,ill' box trees will not: be included as a part of the Gas Tirix Project, lout: will be worked out: as n condition of development. of t-he adjacent. property . The City will • consider alluwinU the street tree requirement to be incorporated as a part of the landscape requirement of adjacent. property. Itisnfar as atorat drains are concerned , the City of Huntington Beach requests that the Huntington Beach Industrial Park construct the storm drain system required for the development of Springdale Street , McFadden Avenue, and Graham Street . Sinco this is ai Master Planned Project, the coat of the drainage facility will. be applied as credit f toward payment of drainage tees . The City will not require installation of a wester line on Springdale Street . The developer of the property west of and contiguous to Springdale Street will be permitted to "hot trap" as necessary the existing 36" line in Springdale Street at the time the property is developed. It will be the respf)nsibility of the developer to provide fire hydrants (approximately ! ) on Graham Street as required by the Fire Department. There is no requirement nor is there a need for the Huntington Beach Industrial. Park to install an identification monument or to provide a separate landscape area at the northwest corner of Springdale Street ' and McFadden Avenue to identify the industrial park . Huntington Beach Industrial Park will be respr,nsibte for processing the various parcel maps, tentative parcel maps , r,reparation of storm drain: plans and installation of master storm drains. Additionally , Huntington Beach Industrial Park will bb responsible for all fees and assessments normally charged by the city for Industrial development. It should be clearly understood by all parties that the reprioritizing of the Gas Tax Project to move this project up higher on the priority list: was done to enhance the desirability of this site for the Weiser Lack Company . Should the Weiser Lock transaction with the Huntington ©each Industrial Park not be fulfilled , the improvements outlined herein will be subject to further review which may postpone such improvements . The contents of this letter constitute a statement of applicable City policy and should not be construed as bestowing upon any person or organization any benefit or duty not otherwise provided by law, Yours very truly, • Floyd elsito H . E. Hartge Acti City Ad*iniatrator Direc or of 'Public rks Reviewed4byi ity Attorney char War ow Director of Planning ; and>t;nvironiaental Rirwurcess•it nt c :;y „t 041y , . AmL,1-MMIr Or LV W14A Or IS CITY VAr1 r d r- ^rwnc i t 01.awh-r. 1'r l y ILr l l llunt inytuii 14-ach, t•..l t'urilla �. �"'� Jltaadty....Llal►-�.--1f3�.... .... o 144 or Wittier Villi'd tltu ►egalar hroutiriy of thtt City colu►c*1 11ti1.ij caty of Huntington boach to aides at: 11W pool. •,11461,1 11L i-A61 •ett. /.� -..�#...1. f 1�.. a1A---�w lat.—U— r-LaA � .... �w.►� '• :. �'r• •�a��•q1t+�•�•••a•••raa••••••�•�••.••••t•q•au•,.••t+•aa•�•••.••r•gaeaage�aaa•�aaga•.ea• � QAS TAX'PIOJIdCT - INDUSIR" PAltlt - (CA 76-%)1Wd (G 76-SGAI 1%* City Clark proeonted a comunieation trots the City Adstinittfator dated April 27, 1976o recamandinq that tits City Imsedlately proceed with a project to comlete the street work an springdals Street, Gishaal street, salsa Avenue and McFadden Avenue Which could be financed with CAA 'fax Fundc. A supplemental City Adlrinlstrator coswulieation dated April 29. 1976 was Also preAentod to Council reconvohding that they adopt a poLley whereby the City in regard to off-site and other leTrovemant cents, may be able to Provide litaistance through the It,sullatforl of Public Works Ipprovessonta to sctt,al 6eveloysiont, thereby reducinq the site preparation costs. A motion was clad* by Councl lr*sn Shonkitan to approve the protasod ';as 'talc tr'o jest An that Industrial Areal suthorlur the nitector of Public Works to prepare the plans and �• specifiratfons and advertise lc,r bids and further, adopt the rec— ended policy In regard to off-site and other 1*1srovewant costa. Thr motion was passed by the (allowing elite r AVtSi 11A att, Pattin•un, Cootie Gibbs, Siebert, 5henkstan, Misder Notes Hone . ANiaK r Not►* On motion by„p,arJ_t„tt _ ►rr 1Sliabt. the seyular r•ooLtnq of tl1,t t'itr couuetl Vf tilt City of lluntingttm lle.tch ,tdlulitned at _ �_�. ;• Lit 'daaillSAY�..1211, nth y;i In the_ UMCj �NbC�es... .....-.�-..�.' TIK, elution was passed by thefolluwlnq mist Atl.Sr --paLLlott. QCA Was..0 IL�:.� IWLS i JiCGR_ AN ffr 1 � Alicia M. Wentworth City elf-rR anti on-of) lcio Lirrk of t111t City Council vt thit City ATrL%Tt of Iluntingwri teach, Cifllforuia Afataa Pt. Vvittvurth Har:i�,••et„t M. MI 4L • City eperk Meyer MA71' VI' CAUl'tillylA ) Cau111 y of nratiyo 1 Ss t City of Muntington Dosch) 1, ALICPA N. WFUTWORIN, the duly elected and quailtier! City Cloth of the Cite eft Ittril itrata.t Mach, California, Ao 1terlrlry c*rtlfy that the: abrve •lid fatt"nlnv is, a t rov attd wr►ect htatcownt of M•t ion of the City Council of avad rtty at their 1"voldir �..._�actinq hold on thd--bA- —#Ay Of— AhLw _.�. 11,. �• wl'tnt':a. on, h.trla and ►dal .of ilia mid CILV of Misntiniotteo Desch this tlw daft of .1 •.r...�lr�t,��ll fir.�.,. � Fr .w. � .f +. City Clef% AWW an-off sttlu s:l-lrlt 1 of thT City Cewtet1 0: low t`,)ly -` � 7 eti Mtr�.+•�/ttsn MiarM; l'.t 1 t 1 rf r�1 d _ e ' ot,pt.ty► aIT 01' TRI; ACI IUH W' 1*111: C1111y x:I I. . IIU11f !/ti luJl1,l/th't 11r,IC11. V.11 1 ,6MIt•1 • Mayor Wleder C.AlltJel Ulu regular moutini) of the City t'111111:i1 ,. . e1l' I l.0 t:ity elf 11untington attach to order at 7st?0 P.M. I'I;ciliirl.:� Bi t PatitihsQn. dS"Iffibart.;..Shank-wasir,U46dex Ahh,lllt: None toAa ***4A***A** *AAA� �AA�AAAAAAettAAl�*�AMAAA��AA*f�*AAAAAAA��AA��AA6AAAf ***Nato aa*am**% 1 'GU TAX PROJECT - INDUSTRRLA_PARK (CA 76 56) 'J ID (CA 76-56A The Clay Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator dated April 23, 1976, recommending that the City immediately proceed with a project to complete the street work_ on Springdale Street, Graham street, IlolsA Avenue and Mcradden Avenue which could be financed with Gas Tax Fundu. A supplemental City Administrator communication dated April 29 , 1976 was also presented to Counrli recommending that they adopt a policy whereby the City, in regard to off-site and other improvement crints , may be able to provide assistance through the installation of Publir Works improvements to actuol development, thereby reducing the site preparation costs. A motion was made by Councilman Shenkman to approve the proposed Gas Tax Project in the Industrial Areaj authorize: the Director of Public Works; to prepare the plans and � specifications and advertise f.?r bitls and further , adopt the recommended policy in regard to off-site tend other improvement costs. The wtion was; passed by the following Votes AYES: nartlett, Pattinson, Caen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: hone ADS ENT i None �A •0aR••6. •i O .a •1 a 4 a as aaaaA0 *4a .a*0 0a00 *0 a 6a*aaa06 & aaAa46a. .a4%640,96006 • On tssot iols by fl�r, l sri� �i=13t Gibbra _t1:v r etau i al _ rnee t inq of t.l l,r City Cvu11Ci l of t1ie: City 01 11unti tiff tun 1leach asp jutirnud at. 4 :- Lu Tungday...J1U.3a�.1.17f2�,.._ �It in the =,n J r'h"mhCZA Tilt- motion was passed by tile following vote! t+ti 1:5: ._�artic.kt cs tiiti n`CLcn. .l3at�s� .cLsZC. tenl•.man,...&cler Al�sl~n'i• 110_nn Alicia M. Wentworth City Clt!rk and e..c-oft icio Cleric of Mle City Council C11 the City A'insi, of Huntinytan beach, California , Al.it:ia M. itersttwtJrtls Ilarriett M. Wieder Pi City Clerk Mayor County of Uranyt! ) SS: City of Huntington Reach) 1, ALIC!'A N. WENTWORTH, the duly elected and t:it.y Cle-rk of th'! CIV-s %%I Mutt sniltott Ileacit. . t'aliforriia, do hereby cortify that the alJrivc and (oreyniny i:s a t rut- and correct 5tatelst<Int of Ae_t ic►r. of the City Cutsncil of watt vity at their rer)lt',•�r nm!et my held on tIic__ jL& day o[ f�v • l'� ,• - WLTHVS: : - ' holut and teal of the paid City of Huntington Reach thix the dJY of 19.76 _. ..,...._..b.1.i�La.,.�._.y►r,�.i.ytoc tl�,� ...._. City Clerk and ex-ofI %clu CI-Irk of t)v. r. i ty County i 1 0: tttr t:1 t�� of ilu� ngtort lsa.e:at, : .►) l l vt aY +�- �• 1.