Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79-2 - Alignment of Atlanta
_rik�;fit rr f hf�"y* .�75•r}I.,f' r.y.i j,.i�?•}...it "' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRFCISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public heetinq will be hold by the City Council of the City of Huntinron 134acft, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center.Huntington Beach,at the hour of 7,30 p.m..or as soon thwufter in possible,on Monday the 2nd day of July, 1979,for the purpose of aonsidwing Precise Plan of Etreet At* rw t No.79-3,a proposal to precively plan LZke Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue establishing p0 fw of right of way. A legal detription is on tit*irr tfa Planning Departn.ant Office. All intwest*d Wnsons.art invited to attend wiJ howinq *M a:p+*ss tlwir opinions(w or against Laid Ptsciw Plan of.;treat Abgnm*nt. further information nw*V be obisiried Irnm the Office of the City Clwh,2000 Main SStrw.Hurlrnpton Btonh,CA 92GAR 17141536 5226, U+trd 609179 CITY OF 11LINTINt1TON REACH fly ALICIA M.VVENTIYUIIT►t City C104 Put),G121110 }aunt 84mch Ind. ..r , L�sr l,a t� _- >•MN.N. .....1w'.•.I.�..n...c•TFI y...Mt..... al.,r.4 t.i...•✓. .. i ... ..— ll...i,.. .. « _T.� T # IN Mitr Sup6riar Court OF' 'tliE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLIM ........ ..............._..............I.—....... ..............•..... . . . . ..._ . . . � � PROOF OF PUBLICATION ............-...........".......... ............... ...... ...._.. .......... ... ... .......... . ... . .. .. •.•......a.. .'�E.�r ... . .. . ..., a State of California t ss : JwTiit7g�tl County of Orange Rita J. Richter , .r O That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the 41tan. d Vruted States,over the age of twenty•onr years.and that I am not a :u llw •a ira party to.not interested to the abo..e entitled matter. that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the I At st° Huntington Beach Independent Review Mwvta '` � ►t++d �� ,wr a*d rmW *war:som** U4# a newspaper of general rtrrn..:lit ion.publi!hed in the City of ..x.fit No 140 ?w cult C09"$aI "aft�4 Muntirwton beach op"O&WWft Count of Orange and +which ti,e►rs a r is ubb hod for the dis y p � p" r >tit Ke�roe+ai itbt Y.t3�, seminstion of loeid ritws and intelligence of a general charartrt. and which newspaper at all times herein trentioned had and stilt has a bona fide subscrr liim list of paying subscribers, and which n"�z*it .wt . .� A ►'� :1y C„radrg>'iitt OXA6 a i riewspat rr has been established.printed and published at recular irate Ts'feb i lWoust** to .i vs1t ive vim.t slG�rs t Intm•als in Vie said County of(hxner for a I+ctvxt etcoed)rx one t aitacwaw�NA t ', ; Year. that the entire, of shich the anrered is a printed rlVy. has lip oir 1 een published in the tegular and entire isrue of said r4wniatct. ��: and riot in any sup lem.+ni tho.sr f,un Vot(c;low,r•g dairt.tt+>•it �t���kr� tMt �.r Ap r l i 6 t 1970 e �r�t� hnG rrsw.ins`i�r lr i i x, �.Ylal t1�ka ti i�Ae�'#l++1. 1Rs`•' PLA •!l.�c! t+ixittsrit 1Sr«.�#�'�t "' I Wtif} for derIsre i Vn4 r to. A1iV cv'•,y'gat)it:n:sty tr.-r j:...ns,+ true and rotnct ,drden trove Dated at s.allfczrtye'tf+��.'��t�da) of .,, _, ,r �y'"', ,'" 4`f ,P 1 r , S.f��:y_.V��„t aj;^lsn•{xiL 'N£'!)sht%�i1+{���it li�'4 r r td `,FIB �r. yJ r _ 'NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING { PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO.79.2 _ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 79.2* !NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN tout s public hwring will be 1 held by the City Coundi of ttn city of Hurrtinftan Msch. In the Council Cheraw of the Cirk Canter.H'Jntint{ton Eksch,at the how of 7:30 p.nt.,w as won thertettat as pon&4.on Monday tfw 7th day of&by.1970,for the purpo»of consider"Precise Plan of Street Alig:nmsnt No. A ` { 79-2 vrMch h s proposal to pracissly sl'ign Lake Went bstwetrt Orange Arenas are!Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Amanus be- t tweon Delomm Street" Lake Street.The City Ca:metl will be rerievvirM ten 1101 differenr.elternstivu rsistinp to this al4nn»nt mW wits be selecting one.The Ptennkq Contmiarion has recommended Alternative No.i0. AN ten aMsenctires are on file In the Ptannirq Department. A$*W demription h on file In the Plannin4 Depenrewd. , The City Council will dso bs cunsidarkq Negative Devi rs• %ion No.79-29 in connection with I4s"a Ptan of 6ueet A i lrm+sm No.M2. All Interested peceors are invited to sit"acid hearing and ` express their opinions for or spaMett and Strw Aiiiin imrt No.7W2114 patine D"rition No.79 29. Further infor"wCon mey be Qbta:ned from the Office of the Cary park,2000 Mein ' net.Huntington Brach,:A.92648. u1�1 sa+s-aue April p►il 27, 1079 CITY OF HUNTIlNOTON BEACH By, ALICtA M.WEN1WORTH Cfty C*rk Pub,4f26J79 Hunt.Drach Ind. r _ _ t ti�7�y a• �+"j:1 ! t r l: j ,\. � w � i 4 1 r j \wlc a• .� �,../,may //���++r' � ♦- ;;5 t�Pay\ + t •+ h � �� 1 ,n"�i`S]j Yr(�{j �.,R y��� r�- . i +t Ark r .1 � I a t 't t r �� � tr ��'k'" r i t �_ i" .• w 'Yn F.i+'•l�"�.�, tl tit i PRECISE pLANQf' STR ETUIGNT h4: 79-2 NEGATIVE.DECLARATIOVi 79-29 . IMICE IS HERLRY GIYIX that, a public h*aring will be h*ld. bey the City. Council 'of the City of Huntington Brach, in .the Council Chamber 'of the Civic Center, Huntington beach, at the hour of 7: 0 P.M., or as soon thereafter as poosible, on Monday the Zth day ofv , 1979 , for the purpose of 'considering Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 which is 3 proposal to precisely align Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake: Street. The City Council will be reviewing ten (10) different alternatives relating to this alignment and will be selecting one. The Planning Commission has recommended Al tern►ative No. 10. All ten alternatives are on file in the Planning Department. The City Council will alsq be considering Negative Declaration No. 79-29 in connection with Precise flan of Street Alignment No. 79-2. I i , All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing ,and P ' a preas their opinions for or against said Street Alignment No. 19-2 /Negative m no Declaration No, i9-29: Further information may be obtained from the Office of the city �Cl ck , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA. 91648. (714.) 536-5226 k 3 CAM k ri l 23 1979 C1"M Of', 1�C+'N'i'I3i��G'x" N D1�1 H kh By. Alicia M Wentworth s ,, City Clerk >�t �tf + +i.SJ{ �:tnYSr},: .S'=+ ra-+7,+.u.;�t.. '.iirt•s�trr; x:. .rt-7. t 't'. � 'J +.:.. i`s';� r��•, r .e f.,G^4C C r",t'1 y!4 i r 1+ tr f t� t I� ' � .. " ' t�•wtf ��f kyf•d j.if 't9�r4'i'i Yi iY .c4.sw1r1R ,! s 't i7�. r + :-r j. r..i �.. 1 t' + - r �_ •'+ �y"''. + t t, :,r+� �?s'-;.'{ y r , r y'Y".�iit .pit +,� _�.-[. i"t s J r .t k s ' -' f�1 •, ''t' r,t►":'.' �:�. t_�a � .t :•1 isey^^ ;. •4.s�. 1 � -� - .�a� �� nr+•� �,?j�ir �ar t k r► J � +' � .1 'x Ft t 7 � 1 s 1"r t a':,�3�7Y�y.�, 4./}M17 + s x t - t `tc ,.,r r. _r -:� *• a r t. _t •Z X, iT i ;-: T'0: CITY C1RK'S. OFFZCE DATE. a .}. PLEASE •SCHEDWY.• A PUBLP, HEARING tr*ING IrI .ATTACHED ;LEGAL W110E FOR THE: DAY OF 19 , b t AP's are .attached +' AP'a will fallow a. No AP's Initiated by: Planning Comcoiahion Planning Dep&rttavene Petition * Appeal ..�..,._.. Other tlSt �tun (r ?nvron .Adoption of F S Refer to • , ..• Planning Ucj�art�w�nt - Extension for additions) informati n. 5 k J . ' .M•":` * If anal , please transmit: exact wording; to be required ire t2�. legol . �11R M�xq�y x 9✓ r1 o Yl Ills 't'ttt: Su prior Court oV. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of U'sngr ' CITY ."OF''HUNTINGTGN BEACHs PLANNIM ..-..:._....... .... . ..... ...:..... ..... .. .. . .... . f'Ft00F OF PUBLICATION ..... .... Pub IIr...H.raring..T9.-:2........... ........... .... . County of Orange ts. (#eras ttk»' QIYLtt a Rita J. Richter y bl""� ww not i am and at all tittles herein mentioned ryas a ettttrn or the , ,p,rt er r,.�rrry atp t.h�t�uws _ Unded States,ow the age of tacray4ne,years,and that I am riot a sa.ear �" a A"'w wateaii AUAA party to,nor Interested in the abort entitled matter; that f ten the 't' ' AWO ts0ea+ra ������ Y.iaw�r0 aa0t ties �► principal clerk ofthe printer of the �'&s'�" '�''ti t ,wt+nrst ~� stojwotiwst:s� O �� Huntington Beach Independent Rcvlew ��++� ..av+srntl'tr7MCA�'�MM�• . It tsrl ttW ownetrts am bed A0 Y tM► tt. Q a newspaper of geoaral circulavon,pubiiO*d to the City o: al" ON0 ir0 t7wft AMC*No ?►a to 000- Huniington. beach . `t.: rwi. him at Res..►_ tte�r� Ccvrity of Orange and which r>rwspalrtr is N,birahrd fete the dis• �trc trot arm r serninatron of local newt and tritellifenct of a reruns chasacirr, �' A � }� �•�p• AM vMch na.spayrr at all times herrtn mentioned had and still a Call�rs+e has a buns We subscrtotian list of paying subocnbrn,and wtucts • A1!iasr"#Ad)•.MO are Ymaq u ntwa Pape r has t•r'en fit taWishert,prtnted and publi%hH at rtlrutac k W isiow lherva6 iri the said County of tn�e for a cluf esrrrdirt oe t.e ar at•+s+r the1t >l w KV r► year.the the MIKT,d w."Ach the ar"sed Is a printed c%y, hat ?anew blwvwAmq awf be•CA-4 1 twen pubhOied in the.«ular And entire isst+e�of s lid nevfra;w, i�ar wtrrt"l...sat tVI* • Yid tlt,t?! i .ilw bT'L and not in any supOrmect tnirrrot,on the following dAtrs.to wit . t11. +►w ter, of A t�t .)ht .1l.1A1NlXw.yA114 Aprl) .5t 1979 An y fit+A��*f•� if*� 1 f ctrttfy tot cf^elare,uadrr p- alty t'd prftury than the hlrrcrting.s Lrot a rid ree red tt,tnsut Garden Grove e 5�t h A a r f l { , 3'k'I1jtJtl� yy� H r s'rsciR6 rilan.6f Street; 24-163-=03 24-164 :09 A]tdrOMt:Na, 70-4 Noy= A, H�rlaort Miriam T.' Rfrr� kj' , ' 6, 1979' ' 114 Dom Avenm 925 loth'S'treet Dewrrt` Htm Ae ach� M. 92648 Hun t.itgbnci Ha+soh, CA. :J2648 .t 24-204�15 24-164--01 24-164--00, i l tcian M. 0' c3c . Ha3wurd C. Jotson Jr. et al Earl,F. Stel%ww 2bi'AtlarMa Average 730 14 th Street 651 W. Phillips EL,vd. %iidint6n Eutdh, CA. J2649 Dwcho CA. 92648 Powma►, CA. 91766 24-164-10 , 24=204-16 24-164-02 V ank N..Gn?wj BA4ard.F. Bray 5401 S. Mi�gtrova �1VQtxxY `4621:Ioe Patoe Drive P.O. Boc l 209 lnhi..ttier, CA. 90601 "M"mt:,lxtgtart Beach, CA. 92648 ffmt,irxltxn Beach, CA. 92646 z4-:204-17 24-164-03 24-164-11 Inurl w O. �can :E rd T. et al � 318 3rd Street2212 9th Street- 317 ;j kjj jkjk�k ; P :.. mdMton nwch, CA. 92648 E +oc 61 t Huntington B mach, CA. 92648 24-164-13 24 204--1.9 24• 1.64-03 Cynthia 0. 'sylor tit, al `' braCO C. btwall Coor man 220 Via San lino 948 11th 5'ft ,- 317 2rd Stroot Ifundn#w Doac:h, CR. 92648 fhmt:izigtm boach, CA. V26.48 lbwpa t Donch, CA. 92663 t r ; :`24-204-20 24-164-04 24-164-15c?ra,� Cbt�t Spcx~Lal.ti.t� � I A23.oe G. .Sturomn Ibna.ld M. Marry ()rojoct 42 212 h1t1wro Avenw 313 2rnl street I. timIttm toac�~i,CA. 92649 iltvitisxjton limi t, C11. 92G48 63b E. t3ta rc Avr tc 01. 92666 24-204-21 24-164-05 24-165-01, jbikowillai fir, mr)b c;. ;'Ixi.te Atlantic OU Ompwy rd �tt � at ito. ill�309 : I{und-tv.7ton beach, CA. 92648 ljos 11ry Ica, M. 90014 .24-204-21 24-104•-06 24-165-07 Alonzo G tter taatrim H. Brown et gal Cl=les ioriclo/A*x Duricp 416 mal:ti mm n«w. 305 2rd Stm-et 211 011 ve Am,via 'Itiitilta:t Pmclt, CA. 92648 ttr.mtingtcn 1)wic i, CA. 92648 Ehmti gton left, CA. 92648 Y ; w20 .,23 ?4-1t4y-07 024-165-09 ;tom dui N. lft-zian wards 111ccole dirt AlImi <237 '+C itt RXd 400 Ird Street 224 3rcl StsE—..-t 111t%r i, CA. 91001 fhmt.im7trm rwchs CA. 92648 ltuntitp ton aowh, C.A. 92648 Y't 1 rccise ..clan oir 'Street 24-206-10 24�-270�14 - Alignment ,No,-..T 0-4 - C.X. Ba�.euc Jr.: .. *mtirxttcn Beady ampany Hardh 6 "19x4: ' 1737_ Plack Stmt Pimpacty,:Luc Uvisirn . rn ►wnMntirqtcn B6wc # CA. 92648 . 225 ba*i Sts-vat t San Fr i ciaao,- CA.-'9410�4 j2 4=20 6--0 Z '2440f U' 24 itoward ,'r, ttylnn►der5owif him Rally 1b 1j-;WHiw*wm-S p c"O l 127 -Alabama Avenue 117 Alabmia Street 3212?1 ldr4= Cyn. Ad. 11u. tington Beach,' CA, Bmtiog m h, CA. 92648 Suita ,206 : , t 42648 Weet�lak�e V.. . 13.1a0e, .CA. 91361 [24-206-=01 T- 2�,4�—Z,06-12 24-�.260--770.�,{ /�...�,, { J. klyJii� "m D. Gaylord et al First-Awm:ican rust (br t 9631'Chevy Chase Drive 837 W. 5t h Street Phaific Tmi:.her Pw* Wnti:_gtm .Behrh, CA. 92648 Ontario, CA. 91762 8'3 ltuntf,Rx tzxi Strvet PA=ltUwftm Bmch, CA. 92648 24 .206--03 24-206-13 24-144--11 � Thm as L. Jambe Mazy A. Fraux Lem E. Dnbov Street 1364 High Street 305 Oraiga Avm w .ttuntington Beach, CA. 92646 Autxirn, Ok. 95603 Suits A ' Ih mtimt on E*uv , CA. 92648 j 24-206-04 24-260--04 24-744-10 � .Domod d Eugem Ccode Int:repMo Der m1ap sst Cb. Vala ntine ParrvakLan 219 Alabiwa -Avemia C/o 7.izmm3mv C.R. 312 Chicajo Avenw IfUntingtran Fmch, C.A. 92646 P.O. Bast 540 jhmtingbon Boach, CA. 92648 Westi aks,Villogo, CA. 91351 5 2 -206--06 24-250-17 24-144-12 4 Joseph E. WA Jr. Radal D. "Ika*f..ns Rablf f1;Oi,-;1ein 616 W. 10th street 313 MAl.tbr me Aurriva 9962 �Wrn CL=1a c3cszor�, C.J.. 9172n jfcmfan#m Boa h, CA. 92648 1"it:,iMtacan Dosch, CA. 92646 24-206-07 24-260-26 '.VU ,id P. F r1WY1 Ira M. liw*.inD 24�144�-13 :1.011,? Outty S.irk rYrive 120 Fttxtttiruttm Strut �` lty SS �k�Ca.lx 5 I 't.inat�an Fkmch. CA: 92646 Hi,a fire :rxn j3�ra�tc3'r, Ct1. 92E�9E1 j �2ty' S}�r3. j3a�, 5a0 itunUrgton ,a ndi, CA. 92648 2+12G-08��.{{ 14-260-30 y ,t b .'a. glrlich Ct; &I Pooh{.., D. s 203 P.i xvw Street 112 Iim g on Str'ect iJ i.e• 7#J . 1Wnt ngton TV_-;K1h (n. 92640 Bcvvc#i, E.A. 92649 civj Cltrtmtxt, CA. 92672 24-206_09 24--20-51 Ch tt� y Cjr Kf11i Henry T. Sta)m- � 24-14�!-l2 N'bo1 lac'1.9�4 c/o Morin � i��xi a A. ?�i cx�ole et +�. Ef ran�.-is�gton Rxich, CA. 92648 317 Crest Ave 4 tj�3 3 cd Stan~t :•bumt!M- tan rmdi, CA. 92643 j;�t:sarigtm�s �:}, CA. 916vf3 i trie, Plan:of,Stmat 24-, 203w-05 24 2fl3--Z'2 Alahiwi6t 10-4 P1 W. TOo�akre3.1 D�: 1+t2K+scma MarchG,' 1979 740 hve�xiia Atx 3a - .:2.15 Iict :. A�iic�h, Q►. Switch, Ch. 92648 90277 a 24=149-44 24-203--06 24-203-23 Rinse M. t�hal3nq Timms L..' ticn 20522 Seat Air:Circle - 15150 t i, CaA• 92648 beechp Cho 92646 M44arsi m lli.11s, M. 91345 24�-203-09 23-204-01 Y. 4 4 8- R. Charles R. i A�Ct: E. MRyarr Jr. 'B�xd R.. �StuedLi et a1 ' Sty xin L. �t�rni$ian John F. Piaano 836 Preyiislio Dr. 1264 .9miama Drive 220 AI&bwA Sttrot costa !Decal CA. 92626 � Al Barra, Ck. 91001 Huryti=fi= Beachr CA. 92648 24-14 9-19 24--204-02 . 24-2Q3--1.2 �� A. Nics�la et al Sylvia Sha dric..IC Sarah O.P. M rtineau et al 228.1,/2 rain Street 209 Bal.t i,r=e Avows 400 3xd Street 'ittmtinr ban Beach, CA. 92648 Hmt � Beach, CA. 92648 �'` Beach, GA. 92648 3 24-148-�20 24-203-13 Rnmin S. Ijsnthal Rwcm G, Conan 24-204-03 221 3xr3 Street 9192 riaha`Lo Drive Martin it. Walley et al H'untitirfton Beach, M. 92648 fhmtin#w Beach, CA. 92646 624� Ifattfaxd Straat iiunti.rgtan Beach, CA. 92648 t 1 24-34R-21 24-203-14 24-204-04 # Pacific South Writ realty F4eata A. Gillett* John A. G&lhir et al Attn: F.J. Klein 202 Alabwe Acernu! 10.1 Itimstin3trrr Street #109� - #st 12-2 Ittrrrti�ngt�czrr boadi, CA. 92648 ttuntirx�Um beach, C.A. 92648 tti 11rxXelee, M. 90017 r 'jtt jw 01A iY.j 24-203-16 24-20.1-07 = miri on 14. Wlar Alice G. Sturm 213-C Baltltwm Avenue 212 naitfnwre A%,v:rnx �hrrtixx.jtarr bwdi, Cale. 9264E Huntingu n Dea di, CA. 92648 Dept. of Ttarix�rtati 24-24,3_13 24-204-03 12t1:S. 4Srrim Street viola Bmwxtinrl C1cr wa:! H. i,anc;3ster ,} ,14r e1es, CA. 90052 ,1.10 Alahxm .Avm a 206�Falt:.inrrre Avenue 4t~t�tr Staff Assistant IX-aL'= D ftuntir,ytan boadi,, CA. 92048 11wi ::inyUni Bwch, CA. 92648 '24-206-02 24-204-14 24-244-12 C ,7. wim3ar WallAcce L. 23e19m An-ion Willi&* 227,ALat> Avenue 106 Al..aLzra A•Tmxw 190 wi 1•w Drive t�l[1t .11C tt�ri �jr CA. 92648 zh it� E t`h, U... 92648 Iazle#m, 1'A 1E3201 l I ry'•"If � Ar F.,��-.sA',a�µi t' �. r Y.l .rrr}r1.7.. — hi{ ..r r i ' i r f.r�: �l i i4 r r l� �'r �i � ' �,•��{. V = ' s 2y� ii f+�titt�t0✓MFi` 'j� t ,��,r',�yk3�`. t ,tip tY �, It �,:r t ,`�; r fi J ''' ! r r i". ,r t ;�^ 1.f.,� s i {, St `. .l fa,�,X��,, ')k:�7• r"�fi�r � .� '+lsr tr{ ; I r t r 5:� > r. ' �. rr 3 t, s r- 7... 3 f -1b2�24��r,'� t 24-1bS-06 1 a. MMrtl�d�t m `wl �Guwt Wit. a �s= C7,. 91648 I� r 24 165�1T; +, ig rity DrAd'P,Gm 'Pettawl' et au: Doi- I ti an Hoac`�i, C h. 92648' 211. Suet W Yt` Humtinq'bm Bch, Ch., 92648' 24--204-18 J tart G*: Palladino of al 1Ml4rYlti'Si�tsaa#•s et el 'i Owal�a�e Wbotad - 218 SaltInoara Ave t» ' 25241 Heiri street ]Rmtitxftm Machr CA. 92648 L*m*a Hr..Ilo, CA. 92653 s7.{=162402 24-260-23 'F'`tl�urald'E. riki:i Gilbert,horrors Jr. , 231:IAk+e Street 110 Hmt ington Street ''`t astir:+ an r CA. 92648 1itmt'.3.T gtm Deadh, M. 92648 ,.`N,24-264--12 24-26D-24 s :;;'Chi► P].eya► C oxW Pentek et al N. t3'.ain St. Suite D 17701 WdotwoW Ixm l COMM, CA. 92667 tpmtirqton awdst Ch. 92649 '. :FE.R1t 24•-260-28 � 610 ml.i» Strwt; Carol iritt et a1 4 Laic 1 c leer CA. 90014 9Q9� 1i. W- b a Blvd. BID X=r CA. 92661 t t Z ;.16Z»26 24--260--36 a't';Harhrara J. F3..rey et al Durward J. E`crt-ie r` 4924 -.Mwirlbu - i c fty 10819 Criyx Ct. ,;"::C. u'mich ►elECA. 95609 Itxmtain Irall+ey*, Chi. 92708 24 163-�02 �2-f5-250-54 2701 Fali-dew AD&I 1666 9th Street 33 th .18, CA. 92627. Sa l�Y3 tom, ch. 904tJ►F# t33.1 at: a1 viriie. M Ddkre/E.Is a i4. mi.ul 7. ,5 2r'Id S x zt 23571 rI mrrito x . 144itligta► n..n6ac":, C.r1. 92648 L. guna W115,CA 9 265 3 -/ v Prsciaa Plan"of Stt+aet: 24-461 11 2�1-1f�--13 �- 1�13gri�a t.No...7D-+1 jdm I. Pa nukian . Gi1-1 E. W�LI�c�e t Mazih 6, 1979 205 Lo" Stzee� t Ie ttt HklhtirK}tnn erm h Ch. 92648 502 Ca].i.faacttiia<:Sta�eet .rct� Bawer, C h. 92648. t, 024--16540 24--16142 C fRM E*09 George Ow dian 24--6kjkjk . 214 `3td.'St^i est 317 : W Street t I lilit tisygton f c. ►, CA. 92648 HwtiztxM Beach, CA. 92u48 } y. 024-165-12 24-161--14 21-162--1b ICY .et al Alm J. Pr�lledf�ho Jr. C�lyn S. Ian odi, �.;. 3'.Q Doa 4D86 10 E. IIuntirigbm Drive 222 2nd Street �'Santa. Ilea, CA. 92702 Acadia, CA. 91006 P.O. Box 167 I tatUnItni awth, C.A. 92648 1°024-165-13 24-162-01 24-162-17 ti De card MOM Elsie M Bftw-Elsie M. Smith harry B. lAng} et al ,825 12th Street 23571 El Umsti.t o 5403. S. I*saq_vv+e Avenue fNntimton D 3ch, CA. 5�2646 L%3%zo Itil.ln, CA,. 92653 Whittier, CA. 906G1 "624-165-15 24-162-04 24-162-19 Ruth Rurmles/IvAse Dw( Jdtm A. Galkin Mdge Epp Swfield et al 112096 F'. . Strut 101 lkmtirxjtm 5t:re& 320 Jalint Avenue .San i rnasclSsx�, t:1. 924 05 HuntirxItm Vim. CA. 9264 8 33un �, CA. 92648 4--160-02 24-162-05 24-162-20 JX-n A. 7Yainer Etta Lanb at al JWMM J. IbLbxvt `,200 Orange Avam v 18752 Cary Imc 43846 N. C>cclar fkjnt:i.ngtcgi Bweh,. CA. 92648 IttnWKTWn Deacht C.A. 92646 Tarr, CA. 93534 24�-160-t1t3y«�,, 24�-162-708t+�. h24.-,��162-2T1 .*• Ni ovule,lbdhaue I�a aJ• i L a r w Paul. 1.• Pali�.+2.` .,4001rd Street 11051 'Iy Ik 14325 Y. Flcr= L3riw -Ihmtingtxxl Imch, M. 920411 Gat's +t�cr.�e, C.t%. 91640 �t►itLitr, CA. 90603 24w162-o 24-162�-2 2 jdt .14. PaLladina OtI1.1is M. Wn WIVw) C=Iyn S. tic:;axk:x dD0 s.� maripow Ant. 24 t3rrc 235 I'.0. Ixax 1f�7 1,60 Arr7elc!s,CA. 9W20 Itrym .'�'6c'9c'�r, CA. 92318 222 2nd Stry t Ilizitimm4txm Dowli, CA. 92648 2 1., 06 24-162-12 24--162-23 ittf Ann i(wett LenrAxd U. IJjXp )rq et al .loin Parry kf an 02 'ZmI .Str&-ot 1.12 18t1i Street 205 Lela 5tr :t ,Ik. arxJtsmrn F3 xc , { 926IV Ih=t.irrltxmrx Beauc?j, M. 92648 thumt.l�n Win, CA. 92?b48 24- .6I--47 .24--162-24 'le ckm Charles var4.w cAti'�2 4#?.. flencliC:#'tJ, 26.0 4 f,_Lli�i���'Fs���+:«..AxAh ; . u... t .. .. .,.., .. ..... __ ,.__ .. �. _�,.e..«.......•......,....,�.ua _ .. , EST `Submitted'ny J `W. Palin • Department elonmQntr_ 6er.yices ,;:... Date vr�-� o a e pre arad 9 Eacdcu•� M ter tnc ed w 1 a At h N � p Subject I i t PRECISE ALIGNMENT. OF ATLANTA AVENUE'iBETWEEN DELAWARE STREET .Mp , , '. LAKE. STREET AND :SAKE STREET ,.BETWEEN ,ORANGE;wVENUE AN' Cite Administrator's Comments ; Approve as recommended s. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,'Alterriative Actions: a ` 1 STATE NT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment ` No. 79-2, which is the alignment of A lanta �.Avenuri, between ' Delaware Street and Lake Street and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue. RECOW ENDATION: The Planning Commission is .recommend?ing that the City Council approvee: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2, Alternativ 10 and direct the City Attorney' s Office to prepare an ordinance. reflecting:,said alignment. r ; ANALYSIS: Applicant: Initiated by City Council Location: Intersection of Lahe Street and Atlanta Avenue''Request: Establish the alignment of Atlanta Avenue; between Dolaware .Street and Lake Street and Lake Street :.between Orange Avenue . and Walnut Avenue and their intersection. PLANNING COV14ISSION ACTION QN APRIL 17, 1979 : ON MOTION by HIGGINS. AND SECOND BY PAONE, THE COMMISSION RECOKMENDED PRECISE PLAN. OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-2 TO THE 'CITY COUNCIL FOR II .ADOPTION WITH ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT NO. 10 . BEI14G THE RECOI*IENDED CON- VIGURATION IN; CONC PT ONLY BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins, Russell., Finlpy, Cohen, Paone . NOES : None 10,, ASSENT: Stern: Bazi1 PICA 3M x �PPSA ;79--2 Page ..Two f Additional "act-ion taken at that meeting was the adoption `of Resolbtiori 1246; yet !ON MOTION BY PAON£ 'AND SECOND ,BY PRONE, RESOLUTION, 'NO. 1246 - AS':AMENDED TO, REFLECT, ALTERNATIVE NO- 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN- MENT WAS ADOPTED .BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins, Russell,. Finely, Cohen,. Paone ' :NOES: 'None ABSENT: Stern, -Bazil DISCUSSION: In 1970, the City Council adopted Precise Plan. of Street Alignment No. - 'l0--4 , which is the alignment of Atlanta, A-,,re1iue between,. Delaware Street and: Lake Street and Lake Street., between orange Avenue .and `Walnut Avenue. This alignment as adopted, has never keen constructed and 'after numerous `discussions, the City Council has reconvi ended) that this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and anew precise plan P. , established for this alignment. At the Mardi , 19, 1979 City. f trAjncil meeting: the Council directed the Planning Commission to :I review alternative alignment designs and report back to the Council Vii.th its recom mehdati.on for a ,'rew precise plan for this intersection. ' rIn Apri'l 17, 1979, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2. At this meeting, the Commission reviewed ten alternatives -and a variation of one of those alternatives. The ten alternatives reviewed were the same as those presented to the Planning Commission as part of ;Precise Plan of Street .Alignment . No. 78•-4 . After reviewing all eleven of the alternatives, the Planning Commission selected Alter- native No. 10 to be presented to the City Council as the conceptual ( design for the Lake Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment. Attached are both the staff reports from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 dated August 1, 1978, and from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 dated April. 17, 1979 . The original ten alternatives are discussed in detail. in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 , while Alternative. 4A is discussed in Precise Plan of Street Align- ment No. 79-2 . ENVIRONMENTAL-'STATUS: Precise , Plan of 'Street Alignment No. 79--2 was assessed for environmental effects under Negative Declaration No. 79-29. This negative decl.ara- tion addressed all ten o€ pr oposed roposed alternatives. - Negative Declara tion No. 79-29 was posted for the prescribed length of It 'in the Office of the City Clerk and the Huntington Beach Independent. No co=ents were received by the Planning Department- , either . in writing � or oral., during or after the .posting period. , f ' I ,�rst. J •4 f; iC t}• 4 ` , ` 1' ' t r.. , tt 1 1 _{ r2. F r • Page":Three Y. �-tl of f ,+ + ,,"� _'. _ ` { , '+ i r1• i+7 t t ON.:MOTION BY. COHEN AND ,SECOND HY.;HICGINS NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO t ,. 1 L 79=29 WAS :ADOPTED BY -THE FOLLOWING VOTE z .:.'AYES: ;Fliggins, Rus ' e. 1 , Finley, Cohen, Paone ,tt: ' .NOES:' None srF� "'IT- Stern, Bazi1 FUNDING a t ti Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE -ACTION: The Council may consider -any of `thy: "other. alternatives Ebat werz submitted to the Planning Commission on, April, 17, '. 1979. Each o£ ` v: the Pleven alternatives are part of the attached' staff reports aria each has been analyzed for both advantages and disadvantages.. .., IIII SL-PPORTI NCB. INFORMATION: 1. Area. ;dap 2 . Planning Commission Staff Reports dated August 1 1978,, April 17 , 1979 3. Negative Declaratim No. 79--29 'Respectfully submitted, M �am e W. Y a li n Actin Secret;ry JWP:SMBt c 'g ' i sl r; 1 ..1t f v•I f���r '��� �~ �y��' t} �W , i�.�•� r :1'... >..:,,. y �`:,. 1•�, ( � •' (`` 'r. �_"' '.; a. ( i 1•' 1. �t •••M\• "� �•2 {I�a•.,'�•1iil� t �J"..wwN..+..{.�:•.. �r . r'a' M ,,I�� '.-�. ` /r: /t /F•� / �.f• f{.! "1�� ,.�f-. '.••M n' y M �J�r,,q. 7 j ff �, �;/, /*•yam .+r1(�f, r ti •yf'y -..« ��• i• ,"..."•' , r� ,, e• _r. 'f `;,(c =.t�r,a.�''h••, W� �1`/1i; i/, *\ •j/!. 'S �," • ((+f ' f a. r.Arb• � � .,.�� f IJ ANY'1 i�f f .'' S�_ -. �. Ar oe Y ► ` "' /�•� '1 �• arc - f . .-'� rJ� H �r•! ,/` / .+',r f.4',)'1 Q°iy '+ K .r tf�f iy ► .l t.::r' ._.._f � ` }j ` .ti���hQMrY..� "�('f�'�'' .I •���t+_�'.ytf?r r 4yr :i .Fi....� �• �__ � JT ' �' \`��: ►. f +, S ups ' h� �� sif + �j ♦ +.rs+. M Ir r Gf. ��.t Q� :Z.. +..+.i�aaR�. • •• C. •, `` s�j 0 'jam \ 1y,�/ 4' ,� ', � j yam # ,�w.~.•~ �� M to l �Yt � � 1�\ �f��f' •.V 1. /. / N��r.r ..,a.w a wa�f•'`�...' �.t y�.�rwr.a« wrw+.�.. a. {~� � Rs y .r: l .+til // ., •.�7, /�j��/�•.�j-.( / f i / 1 r. , •��•�' -"�..w..a."' iV'" w• 1 C'�. F'� �i `���' �., !; ~ f�5 .•• ;` PROJECT jA( Ile IP 14 �X, ' M� � C3 k - I♦ ./ . E�unting ton beach Dlcjnnin . ' . . f . g de o ,mont mo .. :. _ 1. ., .,1�`• . . . ' - + --.._—..��...����.a . M _ _ !'�t - ....__ ...�_; ._-�►r-roe,t:^_-'1....�.�.:r� --.��—�_ ._,..........._.mow+.. ��...'�i�!�-'�'� _ .;. 00, IL40 o i -- 11SVISiONS REFERENCES - _.�.�t:...... �,���...� �. iw•:►K �!�q V C7+lA� G' .. r�;a!l���p!'..iAJ«�:IFL".lfLw?l _ e CITY OF "UNTINGTON.IEACH +'sK•r:a.r EXISTING --00NW"-'.: .-. PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGN'lENT -78-4 v ATLANTA/LAKE - .. ._ . ... -- -- ... _ . _� _ .. -.-, — .. .. .' .� -.._.- :ram .�. - . . ,:r• - .. ._ _ _. : ._., 'Sr e ' r - 777 • S+ It T ..PRECISE - PLAN OF' STREET -ALIGNMENT 77.=-3. A �. ATLANTA / .I.AK E - . ._ i �t�T R N A T-E ist 1: i t- ! - 'it ".J _ ! t e • 3" - .5..„,.. f... ,:.'.f' t. ! � rje i ■ it it�•' fr a r T� o $ , . Ylanring . 0 mmission '= �� FROt�ls Development .Services-�planni.ng DATE: Apxil •17`' ".1979 PRECISE -PLAN 'OF STREET ALIGNMENT, NO , 79--2/NEGATIVE. DL•""C"LAItATI4N NO. . 79-29. + .APPLICANT: Initiated by 'Development 'Serv. DATE �ACCEPTEU: N/A LOCATION: Take Street between Orange !•MANDATORY PROCESSING :DATE and . ►walnut -Avenues ; and ry ' 'Atlanta Avenue between N/A Delaware and (sake Streets . I� GI;NHMAL PLAN: N/A REQUEST: Review of alternative `align-� '- ments to precisely plan ZONING: N/A Lake Street and Atlanta Ave. y+ f as described above. EXISTING USE: NI ACREAGE: N/A r 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: z .. .Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 79-�29 and adopt the attached resolution rEacztnmend-- ing that the -City Council adopt Alternatl.::ve . 4A as the precise r•plan'. " : s of street alignment for connection of Atlanta Avenue with Lake Street 220G NEWNL INFORMATION: In 1970 the City Council adopted Precise, Plan of Street Alignment No. 70-4 , which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue, between Delaware Street and " Lake Street and Lake atreet between Orange Avenue and ' - Walnut Avenue. This alignment 'as adopted has never, been constructed ., and after numerous discussions the' City Council has rccammended ' that" this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a .new precise plan be established for this alignment. At the March 19 , 1979 ,C.i.ty ; .. Council meeting, the Council directed the Planning Commission to `ty. review alternative • alignment design:; and report, back tq the Council with a recommendation for a new precise, 'plan for this- intersection. Attached is the staff report . from Precise plan .of. Street Alignments No. 78-4 which was presented to the 'Planning Commission on August 1, 1978 . This report provides ten alternatives for ` thp: new :. F,• t,it I• z f' P.P'.S.A. .79 Page a ignment of Atlanta/Lake and revarews each of the alternatives and provides fiscal "impacts.'on' each 'of ' ,the' ten , alignments :' -'Also , t ' t:' attached, is''one.� additional ,alternative .which ha$ ' been labeled . , Alternative 4A and is similar in nature to: Alternative 4 ' as St ' tAli nmen s ` 7B - 4.sented in' Precise' Plan 'o ree t :3:0 ANALYSIS: ` Each `of the ten alternatives are analyzed , including costs: relatiing < '° to. relocation, ;construction, and land acquisition, in ttie attached staff report. Only Alternative 4A . is analyzed heroin. `Alternative 4A provides. for a continuation 'of the existing_ alignment S and with the use of a 20--foot offset of , the centerline to the south �* o£' the "existing centerline at a point approximately 140 "feet east of :. Huntington Street this alignment would maintain 100--foot right-of--way. . ;�•. froin Beach. to Lake Street. This, offsetting..of the centerline as ... proposed would eliminate any disruption of the• property on the north ;,.: .: side of Atlanta Avenue. Minimal disruption would take 'place at ;the� ,. t . intersection, which helps to maintain a 'lower estimated development cost for: this alternative than the majority of the . ten -alternatives explo):'e'd under P.P.S.A. 78-4 . Cost Sw�m Right-of-Way Alternative Ar.�uisitiott Relocation Lake Street tbnstruction 7btal Cost 4A $4241000 $234,000 0 $440,000. , $1,098,Oo0� : 1 It should be noted that the figures used to compute the total cost for ' this alternative are the. same as those used to compute the figures on the other ten alternatives, except U'lat the construction . of the .intersection has been based on 1979 construction costs. The cost estimates .for the ten alternatives . in the attached staff reports were figured on 1977 dollars. This alternative would .lessen the relocation of residents on the north side of Atlanta and minimize the impact on the property .at the northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama. The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Commission may. have on this alternative or any, of the alternatives 'presented under P.P.S.A. 78-4 • 4. 0 RECOMMENDATION: 'The staff is recommending that the Coimnission`` adopt Resolution No. 1246 recommending to the City Council: that Alternat•.ive 4A be the, precise plan .of street alignment for''the Lake . StreetjAtl.anta r Avenue intersection . t t% 4 1979April` 17; PaOd , 3 ii s 1 Altdrna ve- 4A :Negative� Declaration' 7.9 29 'Report: f6rprecise - Pla . n of t .. . . s dated August 4 �Reitolution of Intiant! 1246 o: :Y Slbidf r � t �� "•� ` l4 � s� � � +tlf t�l � �' S ! s �i + - ',• �� � r '` ;1} ��I. 1 �t� t'pf r ' ` r r, i � t 1 '• i !.1 C»� , ;; s J 't ]{�-w�•,�� - 'i.i St :i l f•. r. :+ t3 III 1 ',.,.�. r _1\.. Mf - If �J` ; 1 i 'o LEGEND EXIST,. CURB ws ' .,1lr EXIST 'RIGHTS OF WAY.,- a: le EXIST ;,. ' PR OPQaFO STRIFE • PROPOSED 'DOUBLE, YELLOW STMPE , � •s, LEFT OR RIGHT .TURN ONLY -L:IJE- M----'� 'PROPUSED CURB. , r '►� ! Q PROPOSED 'RIGHTS OF WAY APUISI i 10N =; SCALE = I"" I C O N NZ ,•' S 1 r t �Y 1 tt;J 1 1! 1 I y V). . R.R R/w w ALABAMA ST. oe jISM,' S���. + ' �. ; - •1 + i �.�•�. �...,.......� ALINEMENT S'rl1DY PLAN 40. ATLANTA AVENUE AT LAKE STREET 777 / •/ / / i ^ . S.Y. .J 213 i 971 AL-1 HsqkTlVE,4AX • t '+ r :i;.Ft.•.t" �:i.).. Icy t 1 •t..r )rf ! ,1`, },t{' 1. +' t r , -• _ .t'•d 1� rtt-t ';•X + i w�(S .: _ t T.^ 7,. r '. y s. :t .�, � 1_ `r j� t ��:. `1 .t �' t t t ,�i.: 1 :k.n t • 1-t T Iti r ' r. 1. 's rr x4r+ {�. t d t- } i •1 �•�., ' 1 C ! '�` 1 t { 't - 1 J'�Vt ♦ 'd _ �. '.?a.l t .tt'.r r`_�('�{"•} q A•,t�, t i t i c 7 , •t f. � t• .'t !S .. .. 'cif t iI Pla»i t TU• iing Chi&mission !FROM: Planning Department ,DATE: August 1, :' 1978 !' ! ;c RE: PROPOSEDALTERNATIVES" F�R .PRECISE PLAN STPXET 5' ALIGNMENT NO. .•78-4 (ATLANTA/LAKE) 1. 0 .SUGGESTED ACTION: Staf f recaitimends that the Planning Commission: 4 1. Select Alternative 3 : or 9 as the preferred alignment, t 2. Direct 'staff to set Precise .Plan of St-reet Alignment No, 78 4 for public hearing . at . the September 6 , 1978 meeting 2. 0 : GENERAL INFORMATION f t • t�it On July .5, 19781 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution of Intention No. 1225 initiating proceedings to revoke Precise 'Plan, of ?t, Street Alignment 70-4 and to adopt a new precise, plan for the inter-- section of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street. This. report•.prosents a summary of all ten (10) alternatives• that have been considered by ' the Planning Commission to *date. Included in the report is a drawin�3 of each alternative, a discussion . of `L'i1e advantages and disadvantages .or each alternative, and the associated estimated cost to implement each alternative. :3.'0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES : The':pr'imary areas of concern with regard to these Precise Plan ' alternatives are as follows : (1) The impact of the alternatives on local circulation patterns .-. In particular, the impact' on east/west circulation and downtown/ beach access . (2) The cost of impleme'ntating the alternative, including.. rigriit-of-way , acquisition, relocation, and construction. stidt 71 (3) Engineering .feasibility of the alternatives , inclt3ing .safety considerations is - , t _ • - - _ i • I r ! 5b 1. �' y x ..! i ' t I ��•� 1, tj i � y � y l , ..y �''WS �• k• 5 ���F PRECISE,- PLAN -:OF '"STREET` ALIGNMENT NO.' 40 . `ANALYSIS: < Precise flan of Street A1�gnment No.. 70-4 was adopted in February, t 1971, and was `intended to,'provide a direct "east/west '.connection .between;, ;'} Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest .:Street- utilizing Atlanta Avenue . and -a one-way` couplet. composed of Orange Avenue and olive: Avenue., Although ,'! { the goal ;.ox =improvincl east/west circulation in the downtown area has been retained, the 'concept of the one-way couplet, which 'as ' an :.ante ral f part of the Top-of-the`-Pier Plan, has been deleted from the. Cit,tw.�tian Plan 'of Arterial Streets ands High-�ays . As* a result, PPSA 70-4 no longer reflects 'the City circulation plans and objectives. In ,1977 , -the Planning :Staff developed five alternatives for a, new precise ;.'plan ' for Atlanta and Lake. All five ali.gn6ents called for a 100 foot width on Atlanta ' (presently 60 feet wide) . with the additional. right-of-way coming off the south side. Three of the. alternative , pro- vided a direct connection between Atlanta. and Orange, accomplished 'by curving Atlanta northward between Huntington Street and Lake.; Alternative 4 corresponded essentially 'to .the existing configuration, with Atlanta intersecting Lake °at right angles : Alternative 5 proj.*Aosed to :terminate at Atlanta , which was to curve southward to intersect. with ,. { Pacific Coast Highway utilizing the existing Lake Street right-of-way. At ics . June 22 study session, the Planning Cotranission directed staff -to prepare additional alternatives based on the following criteria (1) the Atlanta Avenue right-of-way should be 80 feet •wide; (2) a direct connection should 'be provided between Atlanta and Orange; (3) - impacts on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta should he minimized. Four new alternatives (Alternatives 6 , 7 , 8 and 9) ;•.ere devel.dped. by staff and presented to the Planning Commission at: the Jul.y. 18th meeting . These alignments involve significant design problems due . to undesirable curve radii and sight distances . An alignment that provided an adequate radius would necessarily have a greater impact on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta ,. since the curve would begin at a point closer to Huntington Street. Therefore, choosing among tl.ese alternatives involves a tradeoff between'. design safety/traffic flow considerations and, the cost of right-of-way acquisition and relocation . The following discussion presents a summary of each, of the ten alternative alignments that have been previously considered by the Planning Commission. ` 4 . 1 Alternative 1 i Alternative .1 would provide a 1.00. foot wide right-of-way and would be • realigned 'north to intersect with arnnge Avenue at Lake Street . . .The , 100 foot 'Wide right-of.-way would be maintained to 3rd Street at .which f oF.ECISE 'P.LAR. OF. STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 70--4 f :page 3 t point', the rirlht--of-way would .continue at - its . present width of 75 feet. 'The .'alignment: would require purchase of property and relocation of Persons living in''•housing structures .lying within 'the proposed right--of7way Alternative l would k also entail the cul--de--sacirig'„of, three `local streets . Alabama Street. would be cull--!7."saced. where . it „ intersects .with Atlanta Avenue. 2nd Street and olive 'Street would :be', cul-de-sated at Lake Street. f ff F Ir .4 . 1. 1 .Alternative"1 Advantages . 'I 1: PrC'vJ.des an• Fast/4lest connection between Beach Boulevard, and =, 'I Goldenwest Street f ' 2, Provides a parallel street to Pacific Coast Highway that will relieve traffic congestion alon Pacific Coi,%.st highway. 4 . 1. 2 Alternative 1 Disadvantages f . 1. Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . . 4 :? Alternative 2 provides for Atlanta Avenue t:o' be designed at a 100 foot right-of-way and swing north to intersect with .existing Orange Avenue at Lake Street. This alignment does not require the purchase of land west of Lake Street as is the case under Alternative 1 . Howl?iv&r, t+he Alternative 2 alignment .?ould rcy.quire the acquisition of more land east of Lake Street. 4 . 2. 1 Alternative 2 Advantages 1. Provides a direct east/west connection between Beach Boulevard . and Goldenwest Street. . 2. Would not require acquisition of properties west of Lake Street. . 3. Provides a parallel street to Pacific Coast Highway. 4 . 2. 2 Alternative 2 Disadvantages 1. Cost may be prohibitive. 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 3 Alternative 3 Alternative 3 partially recogni?:es the financial and social costs. that are characteristic of Alternatives 1 and 2, by providing for fewer resi.dences to be relocated. .Alternative 3 provides sor a 100 foot right-of-way using the ' e.xisting cub line on the north •slde 'of ALIanta Avenue as the nc.•rth boundary of the Atlanta Avenue Street section extending from Boulevard to intersect Lake Street half wrny`: betwehn Orange Avenue ar'. j a.ve Street. 1 �y PRECISE PLAN OF STRE T"� •ALIGNMENT 140. 78--9 .Page 4' t Alternative. 3 ; while it does not; -provide for a direct,'connictior, between 1 f Atlanta Avenue,, and i orange Avenue, can .be 'des.igned to, permit:, a " stnad%. flow of traffic' between the -two streets through the estibli:shmeni: of `a ' signalizatrion program. .Proper signal phasing between;'Oiarige arid a ' }{p Atlanta would accomplish the goal of providing for improved east/'west traffic flow between Beach .Boulevard and Goldenwest. ' Alto-rnati.ve 3':, 6uld require the cul�de-sacirig 'of 'Ulive -Avenue,-and. 2rd .`Street. x, } +., 4 . 31 Alternative 3 Advantages 1 While total cast continues to be high, a reduction in acquisition, +; relocation .and construction costs over Alternatives 1.• and 2' ai'P. realized. ". I 2. Relocation 'of. residences would be lessened . . 3. The goal of developing , improved , pass:/west traffic flow between-, , r' Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would 'be partla].ly ;,reali ed. 4 : Minimizes impact on property on northwest corner, of Atlanta 'anci Alabama C4 . 3 . 2 Alternative 3 Disadvantages 1. Potential for traffic delays 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units .' 4 . 4 Alternative 4 ; Alternative 4 provides for continuation of the existing alignment , ' ` and taking an additional' 40 feet from the property on .the south side . t. .. : of Atlanta Avenue, thus 'providing a 1.00 foot right-of-way. , A signalizrition'` ' program `as discussed under Alternative 3 would • be established. Olive Avenue and 2nd Street would be cul--de-saced under Alternative 4 .'' 4 .4 . ]. Alternative 4 Advantages 1. while total cost continues to be high, a reduction in acquisition, relocation and, construction costs over Al teLnct-.ive,:,'.' l and '2 are. realized. - 2,-,, �, Relocation of residences would - be lessened . 3. The goal. of developing improved , east/west traffic : flow between Beach Boulevard and. Goldenwest Street' would, be partially, rdalized, . , 4 . Minimizes impacts on property on northwest corner -of Atlanta and Alabama . .PXECMQ- PLAN OF 'STREET ALIGNMENT :NO. 78-4 . ' p age ` 404 . 2 Alternative 4 - bisadvanta4es . ' x Potential' for traffic delays 2: '.Uprooting .and relocation of persons from rc-sidentia1, units: . 4 .5' Alternative '5. Alternatiye 5 is different in concept%..t' the , first ' four alternatives ,` in that it does Bat provide for Che direct Atlanta/Orange fink . Atlanta. is proposed to' swings` soutitward.'to Pacific Coast Highway, utilizing the existing . Lake Street right=ot-way Lake would `curve "eastward and, terminate in a ."T" ifitersdction at Atlanta . , As a `result, ' -*his alternative' 'would deemphasize Lake Street as, a primary arterial ' ` .; and favor Atlanta Avenue. Beach traffic would tend to utilize Atlanta` as an access route to and from Beech Boulevard. This configuration would 'do very little to improve east/west circulation or downtown access. Alternative 5 is the least .expens.Lve of the proposed . alignments, since it impacts vacant Land . It also provides for increased traffic. safety, since the configuration wo,.-,1d involve, fewer vehicular coi-i= flicts than� the others . The alternative would require the `construction of a cul-de-sac 'on Olive 'Avenue. i 4 . 5 . 1 Alternative 5 Advantages 1. Least costly alternative. 2. Superior design features and intersection configuration: 3. Minimizes impact on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama. 4 , Provides slightly improved Beach access in the event Lake is not extended north. 9 . 5. 2 Alternative 5 Disadvantages,. 1. Does not improve east/west circulation or improve downtown access . 2 . Interrupts Lake Streets traffic . 3 . Uprooting and relocation of persons froin residential units . .4 . 6 . Alternative-6 This alternative provides for an eighty foot- alignment on Atlanta $ curving 'northward starting at a point about 340 .feet west of- the center lire of ltuntington..Street. The radius of this curvy .i.s ,400 feet: for, a .design speed of. 35 mph. The' intersection of Atlanta and ,Lake would involve a triangular arrangement to accommodate turning move- ments. Because of sight distance problems and undesirable inter- section configurations,' cul.-de-sacs on 2nd Street and , Al.abam�t Street are pxbposed - as part of this precise plan. t PRECI E rPLAN.;AF ;STR'KaT 'ALIGNMENT NO. 78--4 t Alternative 6_ would nec�ss.itate 'the:acquisition 'of�_one detached; ! r dwelling`',`on'. the 'northeast corner.,of :Atlanta , and Alabama any d saxteeiX ` mobile' homes, on the' sou-th 'xside :of- At Anta. east 'of -1iunti '�Jb' Streeti. s., �remai.nder -.of the right-of�way. needed is currently. vacant. t , '`•portion of the existing`, Atlanta , right-of-way'', . oul.d •tie declared surplus and sold to' partially offset .the acqui Sit ior ;,:dost:. ' 6 01 Alternative: 6 `Advantages. ,. l. . BFtter `design (curve radii, .sigiit d,a.staiacesj than Alternative:,;7 .-2. _ Establishes Atlanta/orange connection-'to improve downtown access , 'east-;west circulation. 4 .6. 2 Alternative '6 Disadvantages - 'f 1. Cost may be prohibitive. ;.t 2. Invo' lves ' relocation of residences. 3. Design is less desirable than Alternatives 9 •and 10 . 4 . 7 Alternative 7 Alternative 7 is similar to #6 in concept, but is ''designed to avoid .. completely the developed properties north of Atlanta . In order to accomplish this, the needed curve radius is approximately 325 feet. This alternative also shifts Orange Avenue slightly to,. the south Wand 'requires . the acquisition. of one unit on the southwest corner of t, Orange and Lake. As with Alternative 61 , cul-de-sacs are 'proposed on 2nd 'Street and Alabama Street. 4 .7 . 1 Alternative, 7 , Advantages ; . 111 Cost may be prohibitive. .: 2. Minimizes impact' on ' property. on northwest corner ,of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 , 7 . 2 Alternative 7 Disadvantages 1. Very poor 'design features (curve radii , sight distances), 2. Poor intersection design. at Fake 'Street. 3. 'Costlier than Alternatives . 8 and 1,00 4 . Involves relocation of residences . 4 . 8 Alternative: 8 : . . This alighmi e* nt is the most: radical, design proposed providing , for a cur-ire radius of 300 feet wind : a `design speed 'of about,-30 �mpti.. , . It therefore represents. a grade ok"t- .in.`-favor of low, cost rat ,t:he ',expense: of .'saEeti.y and smooth traffic f3aw.. Cul--de-sacs; would bei constructed on, 2n1 Street and . Alabana. F s ` PRECISE PLAN OF STREET "AhlGtMEN'r NO. 7$--4 , Page. 7 }. r _U' l Alternative 8: 'Advant6ges +- I. Accomplishes Atlanta-Orange connection. 4.8 . 2 Alternative 8 DisAdvantages 1. " Highly undesirable curve ra ,g y " di._, sight distances, sand fnte Hirsection c'onfiyuration. � Could ,pose significant' safety problem. 2;. - Involves relocation 'of residences'. ' 4 . 9 Alternative ' 9 . Alternative '9 is a much more mode' rate �design than. the .previous ' three, .' ". providing.- for a curve radius of .800 feet. - This necessitates beginning- the curvature at a point about~ 150 feet west -of the center dine. 'of Huntington Street, result.i.ng in severe impacts on developed property:;. `, , north :of Atlanta. . It is estimated 'that at least twenty-one units would be affected and require relocation. As a result, . this, alignment is' the most expensive of- the ten alternatives . 4 . 9. 1 . Alternative 9 Advantage, Accomplishes Atlanta/Orange connection. 2. Design features are sup3rior . This is tho' best alternative from a traffic flow/circulation point of view, 4 . 9 . 2 Alternative 9 Disadvantages, 1. Costliest of 6' 2.1 alternatives , 2. , Involves substantial relocation. 4 . 10 Alternative 10 Alternative 10 provides for exactly the same design. as' xs shown. in Alternative 51 with the exception .that. the right-of-way width west- of 'Huntington 'Street is 80 feet. The same advantages and disadvantages . that were indicated .under. Alternative 5 apply ,to ,Alternative ,10 . Alternative 10 overall cost may be . the least of all .alt.ernatives, including Alternative 5 singe right--of-way acquisition. and construction cost would be reduced by the difference between a 100 feet .right-of-way and an 80 foot right-of-way . 1; � i •, t �r.�.:;,,� i a ` r."`.+y. . ,' .. is Ir • i + i i / � 1 i , �r 1'" -PRECISE, .PLAN OF-+.STREET` ALIGNMENT NO. 78--4 PageAc =``B r4a11 Cost Summary .,,,,Alternative Right-at-«ay Ft location fake'. St:.. Construe ibn Total' d6 it Aciduisition + "..7 Existing L,70p, 000 286 , 000 . 34Q,000 37.6, 6G60 7 ,596 ,UQp, l: 7 40 ,OOQ 256 ,:000 343 , Ot}0 220 000, 1,'556,,OOQ 2 830,000 266, 000 . 340 '000 220;A00 1,656 ;400 3 �00, OQ4 2`40 , pOQ 3400;�0 2i16,00t�. 506 , OUq ,. 24-0, 000 340;000 210;OU0~� `:, 'J 29Q ,OpC�' 5 591 *000 � 240 ,000 -::,; '.. 0 23D ,000 1,061,000, • 6: 705,000 255, 000 340,000 .180 '000 '. . x;480000 7 675; 000 255, 000 340 ,000 200,000 1 , 47011'aat .. M . 8. 600, 000 255 ,000 3401-000 1801000. 1 3',751coo: 9 875,.000 298 ; 000 3431000 . 180,000 11693 , C.Ob' 10 591, 000 240 , 000 G 23p, 40Q .1 ,061O0t�" i •. • • - IN f ..� ``.y •r. "�' '. � - - - - ' - _. !'•�C: 4�•, M1''.f, tip.• `.r ,�'- � �t � " '� ' t ` "..�' :�. ow '�,'` "'`vim t'' T t fM �i�• Y�` 4 � + t r tt. ...-._, � •� !! a ' .. t'�`,, r'r�ti^4! n' .. .r - +s+ ++rrNc.w-s. :• i` !f-iI .. V .. RfVIS1aNS RVEItENCES t„` OWAV Cfws A&PC-v.fr•vr do-to— CITY. OF NUNTIHGION BfACH• ..,...� e�► EXISTING �-CONDITKW- PRECISE---PLAr4 OF STREET ALIGNMEN. ?8—Q ' AT:1ANTP JLAKE ... .. •,. � _ .�"._ it ,1 ►nrvYtr.. �. . � {{T ( 1 r 116 1 � � ,•tip ! � � t�,. ,I ? �� Z? /, • +�1 . '}• / 16 jq i � .r � , - .. � � , 11 r •4 1y 1. .y '.:. ice ♦ i i, 4R { . rl T t rA 1\ L uVISiONS REFERENCES 77 /gyp' ;tf . 4`L• Y'` 1�. ~•�: `` •`J " "� - nrtt ()rt sd 1 :f s - '� -" - '�Sj�,r!,•yam f4 - .- � - ' .. REFERENCES QEVtatONS f �. :i r . .' . _ . . "' .. .. - '�'�.''"b"�`•. +V'tact-L•ar.�•,y�„r;i:wus.y�-..,e......,:.... �..,,,,�,�,r,;.,, _ v:.'�a.�s�+ 4 t' r" 1 `� �,, � �}j ' '���:��'`� 4.. 4 j ; r�.cs p�*moo• .. � �-' `�.+���.��j\ `• \ '�f��J`1 • � vim.� j � IN 40 _ ..` /- .% t�� � ? { 3 .yarn.-.ter d i i r r j 1 • �•�•- . . ..� �....� r � ,. 'lit 2 i �f f iy�i elk - /.Oil f '. !. E . . . . REVISIONS •.. '. - RfFfkEFtCiS ''ALTERNATIVE . � - -- -- - - - •���_ _ - .. ._ ,. � �. _ �_„ .. - .. - ..Hal _r .. _ .... , _. _ ., _ _ .. _ �.�t++..+�...�.w�r.. �....�...�...w,...�.. �w�. �_____. � ._�-��-�- � .�.... .. +_ «�_. � .. ... -, ...., `-. ... .>v,•,.,: "Y+: •. .pr.v'.K6.•trc9+^e.1L$�'1�� !. t S� ftNhl. -z ; { j - 4 s WWI �7 O• 1 ALTE.RNA ? E 6: � - - f, N%- pop IN 14 ALTERNATE ?; - vs' Aflk _ IS�� - f.tt• y i ' ALT R N A T E c"'.^...�.,;,._.� .ram=, _ _ - - . - _ - • - .r _ . ti • ��1 a'r�tx<'r t XA Al eel f Ni1Hnd tom, r t-7 I firrY t/NG, + ool ` ki It r Is i P RECISE. rLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT . A L"T E R h!ATE i4. _ Ar.LANTA / :. AKE � , AMEMMENTS FCIRCULATION PLAN OF `ARTERIAL.` STREETS AND .. HIGHWAYS ADOPTED ElY CITY CWJCL RUMWKII NO 4Ma-ICC 6.t3T,3 } ` • LEGEND. FP.EEWAY STFITT C-Warf SECMARY, _.Z►= ' �• . NOTE: • s41.v 4.>kCs IcY'Ate tr is t14 0Iml go WIT NO OWTAslARLY �;L1rr,►it 11WT or M7I �..►�, s rlrth►� _ -.—ti off\ ..._ I I . CITY OF c`���. • HUNTINGTON BEACH ! ORANi I: COUNTY CkLIFORMA 41- i; 5 ia.E A W CITI -01' nfln -G-TOn ". ." H U `; ".F';3 , ,• : J' 'DEPARTMENT:'OF PLANNING 'AND`'ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURUS F~;\O. BOX 190. HUNTINGTON BEACH,'CALIFORNIA .92643. (710536.5271 , TO: Savoy `M. Hellavia, Senior Planner FROM: Environmental Resources Section ' DATE: Apri.•1 13, 1979 SUBJECT: NEGATIVE DECLARATION No. 79--29 (PPSA 79-2) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach , REQUEST: A precise alignment of Fake Street between Orange ,Avenue and Walnut Avenue. I Bac ro n bc:sed on the Sta£f ' s initi10 al 'study c�C this proiEct a Tentati ve ; Negative :Declaration was published -in the local newspaper and posted • in . the Office of . the City Clerk for a 10-day public .review period .� ending April 16, 1979 and as of April. 13 , 1979 , no comments were recm_ivea. " "z Any conunerts received subsequent to this date 'will bs transmitted to ,;the .Planning Commission for their review. ; gecormendati.on t i The ,Environmental Resources Section recommends that ' the * Planning . Cormnission , and City Council- approve Negative Dc�clarat,ion No. 79-29 finding that the 'j proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect .oti tfle environment. : J 4 Respectfully submitted, to W mes R. Barnes Assxi�tant Planner '. S. . e " _ _.._. — u...�. —— •_.ram __- — __ _. . ElIVIR0t1MI NT11L • INFORMATIONFD�t1S ` ' FOR CITY` USE ONLY ;, Date r t City,of flu �n Beadi ' Planning DLtxzrtn nt ,Received.: Applicant Authorized Agent Project Number: ?:O. }:" 190, `Allantijton Wadi, ON. 92648 � Department. of Origin ; y. Mailing •Address Planniitc�.._... (114) 53G-5271 Ot� ler F.pplication A Telephone or Permit Numbers ,' _ t ' . See ame ship list on file in the i PPS 79-2 Planning Department j Property Owner Marling Address Telephone NOTE: To assist the Department of Planning and Envi.rontnental Resources in making a determination as to whether a significant env,iron- mental effect may result. from the proposed project, the following information must be supplied , gaps .referred to below may be. vievied at the City of 1{untington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources , a 1.0 Project Information (Please! attach Plot Plan and submit photo' . graphs of sub ect property) . 1. 1 filature of Project-,-, Give complete description of the proposed " project. A precise ali:lrarent of LZke Street: bCt vaen Orange A%vMlie vu.t Stialnut Avenue and Atlantr-i betctv.n Delaware Street: airl Lake Street. .7*zi (10) different alternatives will be oonsiderml by the Plaruiing C.armission. (sa'e. attached) . a . If the project .is commercial o: . industrial , dive 'a complete description of activities and: other pert.i n nt information including .but. not limited to whether it: `is neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of saleu areas (if any) , .estima►Led 'employment pershift, any potent Bally hazardous materials which may be used, etc. Y S 1i b, If the:. project is residential , Indicate`'nurrher, types aid size of units and . associated facilitxas. , P r , c. If the project i s instituionl, indicate the major funetion'; estimated employirent per shift and corrunuriit;; benefits . to be derived ,fron .the project. :�4 N/A ; d, List all types. of building materials t-.) be used for. al.1 structures in • the project. . (Submit detc3ilr�d elevations if available) NrA i J • i 1,'2 Location of project: (Address, nearest street intersections) • Intersection of Atlanta Awnu^, and Lake SLreet ZYJ sus:romling properties. � 1. 3 -Legal Description (Lot, Block, Tract) sw I).recise Plan of Street AlgirnranL 1. Project land area. (acres) 5+ ac• Nwnber of . parking spaces h/A 1. 5 Square feet of building area 14; dumber of floors N . 1.6 What is the 'percent and coverage proposed by the project for : . a. Building 0 b . Paving ........_. 1.001R c. .:xistin land in N/A E� 9 d. tlev landscaping N/11 • • • .. :.. - - -� - -- -.ram f + 1•� I GulluA:t.' .LU.LaLkW1ait11 Jo!i U1: tale, J , �-��. iI (Y j(.�1. Ci ES�iC1'Citll!{11 n� �S,l:t� 3t.ILIUS y (Information, available'; its `Pl ;ining ti�partma t . on District: Maps) '.-.,:• ,r ,�7',, S a �i D � E AI U E L KILN T USE. Zoy?'j7Ca GENE PAL, PLAN +' mostly y h Y vacan�•- R2-PU �•'i��urr, - High U�ensxty resent scxnc> res. units R-3 Res.i.deiitial mbile bmics R 5 i - riixed ise�CJamerci al _. i�G Strc�.. �, r0 OS d �. P e G-3 Oldtcwn Specific Elan Vacant, single R2--I=D Mediun Dejisity ' Surrounding ' t 1 � north multi-fami..ly Re��. Ol d taNm Specific Plan Surrounding Vacant, mobile R--3 t. xcd Use - t mrercial High Density Res , south har+e park, sane R-5 oil extraction k urround:.ng Vacant R2-nD W-diun Demsity R'esid. �! east Single multi- Surrounding C-3 I��i:ce Use- mnercinl Y re west T.Ct �oil e.L 4.L ad— - - t.ion 1 1. 6 What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed within the project? N/ 1. 9 List other public regencies haying jurisdiction by law in approval, authorization, certification or issuance of a permit for this ; project: O.C. Flood Control •District State Division of liighwUys l..J O.C. Sanit•�tion District U Corps of Engineers a O.C. Air Pollution. Control El City Council District r-t .� ^J Planning C6,wission California Coastal, Zone t--t Conservation Commission Board of zoning Adjustments Cl California Regional Water Design Review Board Quality Control Board Q ot:her: Q Local Agency Formation ' Commission r -3- ' 10 If " the "Frnje �s 'cammerG):al, iri��ustrialr .residcriti l what i r ;: is ..the" roadway distance ill miles Irbm the project to' the ,nearest:. Pp a. Sho.. in C g enter ;: N/A f b. Freewa exit N/A , f , c. Elementary School (refer . to Recreation' Areas M.i p) WA a. Public park (refer 'to recreation Areas Map) Inss then one., ii e. Scenic Ni''hway (refer "to Recreation Patll s) Corridors , and. .. s: Areas 'Map} pacific Coasts Itiyhc�y Jess, then o mile 2. 0 Existing Environmental Setting of Proposed Project: Z:1 Seismic: a. What is the distance from the project tc the, nearest Fault line (refer to Fault Map) ? 200-1200 ft. (so. Branch Fault) b. Is the project site within 'a designated earthquake hazard area (refer to Earthquake Hazard Special Study Zone �Map) ? ib 2, 2 Drainage and Flood Control : a. Please describe specifically the volume of drainage and how it will be- acconutiodated N/A b. Is the project wit }n a ` flood h�3rard area? 'fI?.G Or natural flood plain? YT:.S (refer to Flood Plains and Flood 11azard Area Maps) I-Ntrs.3in eastern portion of project area. c. What is the distance from the project to the nearest flood channel? (refer to Flood Control 'Channelst Map) 200.11 (11unti ngton 'neach Ctumulel) d. What is the distance from the project to the nearest shoreline? 1/2 mile 2. 3 Topo2ra2l !: , a. Does the 'projectr site exhibit excessive slope? -(refer to Topography:Slope Map) .. AtvradiwiLcly 10% aL one point b.; WThat is the distance from, the project: to.. the nearest~ bluff? (refer, to Principal Vistas and Features Map) 11he project crossr. the Bluff c. . ,14hat is the range and slope of the' property as : it :now: exi.sts7 k, oryoerally'. t7 a 7?a f0-16 slope gerl G ; r site is"rclntitiely lcu4l.. AIL ' 2. 9 hand- Porin:- a. Is 'trie property presently graded? partially b. Iridieate :the gross cubic yards 'of grad.Ing prop rm osed ureeteinn. ` ,the. acres of. land to be graded the amount o earth to be. transported on -the site and the amount` of earth to be transported oTf e site . +. c. What .will, he . the maximum height and ' grade of cut or , fill after ,grading is completed? undetermincad d. .Is the surrounding area `graded' Yes If so, how will it a.Efect . subject property? partions ct exi9ting vobile 'hcme park site will" require fill. ,r 2 ,•5 Soils: a. Type of soil on the project site? t' I13ncna Sandy, Iar:m b. Are there any Peat and/or. Organic Soils on the site? NO . (refer to Peat and Organic Soils Map) c. Does the site exhibit moderate to high expansive' soils? NO (refer to Expansive Soil Distribution Map) 2. 6 Geologic a. Is the site: .within a high risk. geologic problem area? t (refer to Geotechnical Land Use Gapab.i.lit:y tdap) b. Is the site within an aren . which has experienced a variable and complex- pattern of .land subsidence? V0 (refer , to Land Subsidence Map) 2. 7 13istori.c/ArchacoIo i.cal : . . a. Could there possibly. .be any object, of historic, , aesthetic • or" archaeological significance on the site? If so', , please describe . (refer to Archaeological Sim liistori_.c• Landmark S 'and Principal. Vistas , anci Features. t•Saps) "'� muff line (scenic vista) , a • ty t r t ., .. 1. Per try^t o 100, 2 8r wi:l.d.lifL-/�leget=a .ion: fl ,a*, . Does, any wi dlife use the side for a place to feed,`'nest: or rest? If .so, please .list: ' NONE i t '• '; b. Will. ,any of this -wildlife be displaced .'by the',proposed t project?, If so,' 11ow? ;<< c. Indicate the extent, ' size and species of plant• . life per-- { sently existing on the site. t C WEEDS ` d. Indicate the location and area .(in acres or square feet) and type of plant life to be removed as a result of the project . Include: number type and size of trees to .be re- moved . NMI: 2. 9 1ater Quality : a. noes any portion of the 'project abut or 'encroach on reaches , estuaries , Days , tidelands , or inland water, areas? N4:•ZI,. i b. Describe how the project will effect any body of waiter. 2.10 Air Quality: a. . If the project is industrial , describe and lint: air pol- lution sources and quantity and types of pollAants emitted as a result of the project. WA b. List any A-,- r Pollution Control District equipment, required. N/A t f► y fjr 1 •.+ L j i• - f 11 S •sS Y tl ` .J 1 i k f 1, ` ` �.4 1 { ;., +y +' z 2.. 1 Noise a� Describe any a IJ acent off=site noise •,sources` Ci ,e. ` 4 ,' industry;' .f reeways) t N/A b Va �.a r.e r t e xt a z due h x. '1 � b produced , b c� � ,. What no�.�e wit e b 7 P y P please `give: noise . levels`. in 'decib6l measurement;, and. typical t : time distribution when noise will,'be produced. <<' j No new ;noise sources will ,be produced by' .this realigment. 60-80 db during construction . c, fiow will noise produced by the project compare with existing ; II noise levels? 0-20 cib increase during construction. 10-15% increase after caTpletion due to increased vehicular traffic. 2 .12 Traffic: a. Indicate the present traffic volume on arterials and added trips per day From the project. 5400 AIXP on Atlanta; MOW AD'f on LAe south of Atlanta 3900 AUP nor.tii of Atlanta hizy increase Aur on Loth Like atO Atlanta by 10-15% 4 b. What is the existing speed limit at the project location? 40 MPH an At.l.anta I 35 MPH on Lake j c. Indicate points of egress and ingress to the project. 3. 0 Public Services and Facilities: . 3.1 Water: a. Ili Il ' the project . require installation or replacement .of new water mains? 11a b. - Attach a map showing the service area, size and ' 10-- cation of new lines . c. - please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to serve the project . . .. - -• . -. - L 7i47LdiSiii t , t 1 ! t .F r t• ,j t a t. i • .t � rt ' ''R:r `t r .Ff '• t t -1 4: ,=Sr} ! r r•e 't t t r, � r(. _ l tlx3 •+ rt y;! • 't� J , r; . 7 � a � _stt fa! i .`r r' 14 r .1 = t t t 'a t ♦ .. i t t 1 1 ..4 r r t ;t . y -+ r• ttl r 't y. f f r , t • (' d gL,, t1 r + .r,•� t ct i , f S i' r f , / I, �+,. •. t .S `Il `. :",',Se' +n ' V. �c a. -.Will the pro ectrequire ns allation` or:repla'cemerit,r of t new sev,iex 'mains? r :± `b. , . At:tarh .a snap stowing the service area, size .-ai3d 1.acation ry of , new ,lines. c. Discuss the .'capacity required for the' project an3 how this ' relates to existing zffluent., volumes within •thP system. fP�- NIA 5 t T: 3. 3 Utility Lines • `+ a* Indicate length and type of newoffsite transminsion. and distribution facilities required to serve project. NONE be Do any overhead electrical facilities require relocation? fi YM if so, please describe facilities. Poles p'..ong both Atlanta and, t., e Will .rcqu.ire :.Zlocation and `. tnnderg rowidirxl c. Do existirig lines have to be increased in number or size for project? NO if so, please; deser.ibe how. r 3. 4 Solid was to a, describe the: type and amount (pounds/clay) 'of solid waste 4 ' generated by the project. N/A Type: Pounds/Day. 3. 5 Education : a. For residential projects , note primary and secondary . school districts : N/li Primary: Secondary } ,••+euynr*mf[1tILGfltltlMiAlMi,.te�rsuallitii7 IF - -., 1.f r S. �1 ..1.. ., ';• • i.'F "'. i, t., , Y r Popu arxon', lac�:m .f, f Z- - '., •• ._.�' . . .'fir - s; :2 a.} ;Will any res `denuai ;disp l `accup'nts` be�, `Iace'd by the project actiiv'i;i:iest Yt;S* If not, do riot 'answorquest3.vn._ (b)`: r7 b. ,,::. Whal. ,,is •the ''total .number ' o residents 'tQ .bel�i$ laced? f 'It��idents of '16 trr�l�ile: ;uxncs �Al.i:.4 �,� 5} ► 2 si.ngl.e- y ' ` ', ' •,. &,ellings 'and approyimatcsly, 2 apa�'ta nt unzts (Jtlt: 4) ,t. ' 3.'7 Demolition: a,, �Wi1l' any improvements . be ,demolished or removed 'by the project? ' l Yr * }� z t If so, answer questions b through 'd. . i b: Describe briefly the type of buildings or improvements . o be +,* demolished 'by the project. oil well and tanks, residential. units (see aboM c. List approximate volume of exported material . Undetermined d. Indicate the location and the distance '-to the . site where exported material will be dumped. t , U xJetencuncx3 t ' �. 4 . 0 ?litigating Measures: ` 4. 1 Are there measures included in the project which . may conserve resources . (electricity , qas , water or wildlife) ? Please ' describe. t . no 4 .2 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to re-- duce noise pollution to persons occupying project? NIA If .so, please describe. ' 4.3 Are there measures proposed' in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution to persons outside of the project which is caused by noise generated by the project? YES If so, please describe. in Construct.ian will proceedproceed �zcrx,�:-lance with Ciq, .,E ��citicati4n �egtuxtin<� noise. Construction will be confiner) to n0rrn�al kal�karg lxyurs. *;f construction t:zi:os plac7_- -g,. in t ho TIC-ar future. ' , t I �. � t ,. t : .r f - ♦,' • } ,� .•�.' _.1_ � t jai cf + { 4.' �'s Are , there me"asuzes `in 'thrr cles.ign of';th.e project (architect;ural. treat.meet'`aicl' lai:dscapin� ) 'whi chi have,'Y,een '�coodir�ated F des"ign'Hof the,.'ekisting 'communi ty;"to minimize ,viSua1 ."effect? `please .descl lbe. ti z{"7 Are, there measures or facilities designed `into the,project to facilitate resources ''recovery (e.g.- solar heating/special + insu' latlOR etc. ) ? r 4 6 I' 5. 0 Alternatives : }. Are there alternatives to the project which rmay result in a , lesser adverse environmental effect? YCS ?lease explain all project alternatives. •1 • I I 6. 0 Additional Information : (regarding questions above) . If. necessary attach additional sheets . Mver;,e irgxacts can be mitigatLx] Ly dela1imj consLruction until after. ilgxict(A land uses chanye. (i.e. nubile Ixoni perk) . 1 5 I 4 • 3 hereby certify that the information herein is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. April. 2, lgly S riaturle Date F1153 se,- or I .annex City ,of IfIntington Beach a ttactm-ents •-10" ' -__...,_....�rnt.eYtMilYY.i -_ _- '_ _ .a.rar+'.`14-5'!,v�Yh' sa��.,�•'�N��� RESOLUTION NO . 4822 A RESOLUTION.;'OF TNT: . CITY .COUNCIL OF _THE CITY , OF HUNTI,NGTON` BEACH ADOPTING, PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. . 79-2- ALTERNATIVE NO. 8, THE ALIGNMENT OF LAKE STREET BET'OEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND .WALN,UT AVENUE `AND ATLANT A, 'AVENUE BETWEEN DELAWARE STREET AND LAKE STREET WHEREAS ,. pursuant ' to the Planning and Zoning Law, parties cularly California Government Code Section 65500 , the. Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing 'on April 17 , 1979 , to align pre- cisely Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake .Street; and On May 7 , 1979, after notice duly given, hearing was held before this Council, and the matter, having been considered , the jCouncil finds that said Precise Plan 79--2 is reasonably neces- sary to the ovderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the pre-- servation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city, and for the orderly development of the community, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the j City of Huntington Beach that the real property, shown on the map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto , incorporated herein and � by reference made a part hereof , is hereby designated and adopted as Precise Flan No . 79--2 of the City of Huntington Beach and wore particularly described as follows : . That portion of Sections 11 and 14 , Township 6 South , Range 11 West , in the Rancho Las Bol pia s , City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , S.tate of Cali- fornia , an shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as follows: 1 . . JG: be 12/12/79 Beginning at the intersection . of 'the north-south quarter section line. of said Section 11 having( a;t bearin of Korth with the centerline o 1. _ B , . fAtartta , . Avenue as shown on 'a map of the uiAta Del MarTract recorded in Book 4 Page 5 of Mise' ellaneous Maps , in the "o"ice, or the County Recorder; thence due east along said centerline 205.25 feet to the true paint of beginning saidpoint being the intersection 'of the centerline of 1 Atlanta Avenue . and the southerly pro- longation of the east line of Alabama 'gtreet, .a 60 .00 + foot. wide street , , as shown .'on said map of Vista Del Mar Tract, said east line also being the west line of Block .102 of said Vista Del Mar Tract; thence along said line north 79 .91 feet; thence south 8905913211 west 60 .01 .feet to a nontangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 32 .00 feet; thence sontb westerly, westerly and northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 112002109" , an are distance of 62 .57 feet to a point an a compound curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 277 .32 feet, a radial to said point bears south 22°O1 ' 41" went• p ,+ thence continuing along said compound curve through a central angle of 55007 ' 47" an arc distance of 266 .84 feet to a reverse curve concave to the southwest hav- ing a radius of 377 .32 feet; a radial bearing to said point of reverse curvature bears south 7700912811 west; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 27017143.11 an arc distance of 179 .75 feet to a j reverse curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 32.00 feet , aradial, to said point beats north 1190 51147" east; thence northwenterly along said curve through a central angle of 40°08 ' 13" , an arc distance is of 22. 42 feet to a point on the east line of Lake Street , shown an Railroad Avenue , 90 feet in width , shown on a rnap of Huntington Beach, recorded in Bonk 3 Page 36 of Mincellaneous Maps in the ofrice of the County Recorder of said County ; thence Nest 45 .00 feet to the centerline of said Lake Street; thence south a`. .)ng said centerline 137 .50 reet; thence went 45 .00 feet to a point on the Kea t llne of said Lake Street, said point being the most northerly corner of Block No. 301 as shown on said mentioned map of Huntington Beach; thence along said west line south 378 .25 reet to an angle point , said angle point being intersection of the southerly extension of said west line and the northeasterly ex- tension of the southeasterly line of Block No . 201 as shown on said map of Huntington Beach ; said southeasterly' line also being the northwesterly line of Lake Street , shown as First Street on said map of Huntington Beech ; thence South 41 *21 '12" west. 94 .34 feet along said nouthw east line arid itti extension; thence south 48038148" east , { 100 .00 feet to a print on a nontangent . curve , concave 2 . y+ Y� feet; northwesterly `having a radius.: of 35O .00 a radial bearing, to said point bears north 48038'48" west; thence northeasterly along.said curve through a. central angle, of 39°19 '.41" , an are dis Lance of, 240.24 feet to a. reverse curve 'concave to the southeast having a radius of 32.00 ` h' feet;. thence northeasterly aloeg said reverse curve through a central angle of 50°3b '09" an are distance of 28.26 feet; thence north 50025 9 50" east 38 .04 feet to a curve concave to the south having a radius of 32 :00 feet; thence northeasterly, easterly and southeasterly along said curve throu h a central angle of 81°341,15" an are ,. distance of 45.59 feet to a reverse curve concave 'to the northeast having a of radius 3 7 ,.32 feet; thence south— easterly easterly and easterly along said reverse curve through a central angle of 441011' 55" an are: distance of 291.07 feet; thence north 70.00 foot to the true point of beginning. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hunt— ington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17 th day of December , 1979. Mayor II ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALICIA M. WEI IORM, Cit Clark Deputy City-Clerk City Attome,y .. REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED hND APPROVED: City/fidministrator De��r.�l�;xnent Services Dln cuor I 3. grn ... -. NO. '487.2 i COUNT `off,'OP ANGLE 'CITY OF ,HUVrINdTUH 'BHACH -) it ALICIA M. WSMVORTH, the dilly elevated, qualified City 't1 Clerk of the City, of 11untin9ton Desch, and ex-officlo Clerk of the City'Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of , aberr of the City Council of the City of Huntingto `B+each Is raven; { that `the foregoing resolution vast passed and adopted by the affirmative t , vote of store than a majority 'of all the mewbers of said City Council -i at a regular meeting thereof held on the ;; 17th day Of December , 19 79 , by the 'following .vote: AYES: Councilmen: man Mandic MacAllister paileye Finley NOES: Councilmen: Jer ABSTAIN: Patti.nson ABSENT: Councilmen: 4 . ALICIA M. L1MNTOORTH City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of N tington Peach, California Deputy OIL �a ':`RE CITY IL ION Sub�nittei by James :W., Palin Aepr�rt Oe'velopment: Services nmt Date Prioarid January 14 9 960 8+Khup Material Attach�id Ya :No err, .w��rr �� ■rwr ur / .ar.0 ' :).. T • is City Adminkitrkor's C.omm*ntz Y CITY.WIM4:1L #Ole2 .. y-e j Statement of lme, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source.Alternative Actions: f STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 4 Attached herewith is an ordinance prepared by the City Attorney's office to establish configuration of that portion of Precise Plan of ,Streel- Alignment 79-2 which will affect the intersection of Atlanta j, . ,nue, Lake Street, and Orange. Avenue. The City Council on Decembei 17, 1979 , adopted Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 by r• ;elution for the purpose of expediting implementation of the plan with the understanding that an ordinance would be � forthcoming . RECOMMENDATION: The staff reconunends that the City Council adopt the attached ordin- ance so that official City maps can be changed to reflect the new alignment. , ATTACHMENTS : i 1. Ordinance 2 . Map of Atlanta Avenue, .Orange Avenue, Lake Street intersection Respectfully submitted, s alin, Director Dept . 'of Development Services JWP:JRB :df --j no 3076 QUEST- F%1jn 1C1TY . IJNCIL AUIiCOI'+J � ' �1, yuuinitted by ,jasi►e`s w. Pa n ' Deparimant '..... �P�.o.I'1tlefl �Serylre► t Uutc Pri�ius l �1lI?.0 . 19 ,19 Backup Material Attaches Yt� r SuG ect �'..�3t•.(.j E;' �Ll i _O� rtz.EET AUCI r' NO r: PRECISE ALIGNMENT. OE' ATLANTA AVENUE,!BETWEEN iIE:1;AWAltE .tiTEZI.E;T AND LAKE STREET AND -LA STREET E3ETW BETWEEN ORANGE AVE NU1 ANI) WI+I,N!? City Administrator's Comments h16hrovc as recommended Statement of Issue, •Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, h -native Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is Prec.iso Ilan of Street A. ninent No. 79-2, . which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue, between+ UGlawary Street and Lake Street: and hake Street between Orany� Avenue and Walnut: Avenue. RECUt1MENi) TIUN: 'The Planninc Cormiiission is, recomsne:ndiny that. the City Coutun 1 al p; c• Vo PrPcise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-•2, Alternative 10 and direct the City Attorney' s Offica, to .prepare an ordinance reflecting saki alignment . �c�� •I S Applicant : Initiated by City Counc:i 1 Location: Intersection of take Street and Atlanta Avenue �equest : Establish the alignment of Atlanta Avenues, between Delaware Street and Lake .St:re' et' and Lake Street ' between' Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and their intersection. ' PLANNING CofflISSION ACrION_ON .���.�. l7, 1974 : ON MOTION HY HIGGINS ANU SECOND BY PAONE 11111r: 00MMISSI014 Itt:Ce.tti�tt:t:;�l;li PliE:CISF, PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-2 'I'U THE CITY COUNCIL FUEL An4PTION WITH ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT NO. la BEING THE RECOME:NDI;U CU;iy FIGURATION IN CONCEPT' ONLY RY T11E . 1:'GI,LOWING VOTE; AYES: Fliggi ns; Russell, Finley, Coher,, Paone NOES : None ABSENT: . St:ern, Yazil � PPSA 79-2 E�age Two Addl ti'onal action ' taken at that meeting was tlle, adoption of : Resolution ::1246; � ON NOTION: BY 'PAONE. AND SECOND. `BY PRONE, RESOLUTION NO. .' 1246 1 A.� A ,LNDED ro .REFi,ECT ALTERNATIVE ho. 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN- '_ MEN'I` WAS ADOPTED BY THE ' FOLLOWIhO VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Finely, Cohen, Paone NOES:. None: ABSENT: Stern, Bazi1 DISCUSSION: In 1970 , the City Council adopted Precise ' Platy of Street 'Al ignment No. 70--4 , which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue between 'Dela ware, . Street and Lake Street and Lake Street, between Orange Avenue at:d Walnut Avenue. This alignment as adopted, - has never been constructed and after numerous discussions, the City Council has recommended 'tha4 this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a new precise plan be established for this alignment:. At the iMarch 19 , 1979 City Council meeting, the Council directed the Planning Commission to '. review alternative alignment designs and report: back to the Counc..l with its recommendation for a new precise plan for this intersection. On April 17, 1979, the Manning . Commission- held a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment .'Jo. 79-2. At . this meeting, the Commission reviewed ten alturnati ves and a variation of one: of those alternatives . The ten altes;:.ati.ves reviewed were ,-the save as those presented to the Planning Commission as part of Precise Plan of Street Alignment . No. 76-4 , Afters reviewing all eleven of the alternatives , the Planning Commission selected Alter-- native. No. 10 to be presented ' to thc� City . Counci I as the conceptual design for the Lake: Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment:. Attached are: both the staff reports from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 dated August 1 , 1978 , aril from Precise Plan of Street Alignmer)L No. 79--2 dated April 17, 1979 . The original ten alternatives are discussed in detail in Precise Plan of Street. Alignment No. 78-4 , while Alternative 4A is discvssnd in Precise Plan of . Street: Align- ment No. 79-2. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Precise Plan of Str�cet Alignment. No. 79-2 w.-t:s assom%;ed for oriVt'r,a11111t!nt. ! ; offe cts under Negative Declaration No. 79- 21) . This negat:iVQ' d0C1.11•4J" tion addressod all tat) of the proposed 3l. t:eina( iVes. Neq<tt. ivr: .Det'l:Ir. , tion No. 79-2 9 w�ss posted or t hey proscribed lonyth eE timv Ln t.hU Office of the City Clerk and the Ifuntinyton 13each Independent. No comments were received by the Planning Department:, either in. .writing or oral, during or after the posting period. ' _ .._ _ ._. ....._._.._ ._._....__ . ..... . ....__...a.. waw.M,aaMl.Yiar•Ir+su.L••Me1RLLL.LN M.Wwa........ .. _.,... ... 1M1 1`;tt r TY rx al l.fit !' •:r (�. � Ry}�l rt5 3 1./ t �l i ast+tt i &M' v1YrfAtS �` ♦R .r .J S1X.',�' d41? r�. � � 4 z . ' � W S ,,�.sl�•• N. LU 1 mow.` � ty •'� t't a r ..� W HE- us LL 77 7#1VI, 1 •• � �r Tw r�117! -VI i W 40 ti Alt� � f 'f: �• ? .... . -� - CIRCULATION PLAN' OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND.. HIGHWAYS of art ax"M LEGEND' « FPEEwar 5714. t CM Grr " .�q__ _4— j, �.nrws I/AJ{1ii ,SIUrJO t'• tR.1ilARY. 3�YJOl1 ,� _.. .._.. .. SECOtDARY ZCIDOrJ f+orE 1.L• a1p1►wttsil t••fi•+� �++f v taaap 04vi Or war K±"! •NtJ n!K tb. ' 1 , I .r t so va Nx, low t 1 t CITY OF �` • HUNTINGTON BEACH UPANGE CtO4 t r CALU 064.40A •.� �.. i yM- ` 1,0 (, H un....,T-i f� Ton-- SEA� H 0 DEpA,RYMENT fDF pE1iELfPIMRSNT SEI��/ICES BUILDING DIVISION (714)536.52.41 PLANNING DIVISION 1714)53"271 P.U.Box 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92649 TO: Honorable Mayor .and City Council ATTN; Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: Departmbnt of Development Services DATE: December 19 , 1979 +. SUBJECT: . AGENDA ITEM G-7 - RESOLUTIO14 NO. 4822/PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-2 J Attached herewith is Resolution No. 4822 to establish the configuration of that portion of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 2.0. 79--2 which will .effect the intersections of Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street, and Orange Avenue. We have elected to sutinit this resolution to you for immediate implementation of t-his precise plan, as there currently exists some delvelopment pressure in the immediate area. An ordinance will follow concurrently with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 for the Southerly extension of Lake Street to Pacific Coast Highway; this pre- vise plan will be submitted for yoar January 7, 1980 meeting . Because of the delay between the original public hearing on this matter and this submittal, all material that was pres:nted for review at your May 7 , 1979 hearing has been attached to this cer�r,-municatian for i.nforma- al purposes . We have also attached the minutes of the May 7 meeting, Sion } .:, P P ` at which time conceptual approval for Alternative No. B was given by the Council . Staff will be prepared to discuss this item furtlicr with you at your D�:Cc fiber 17 , 1979 meeting . Respectfully submitted , ) am--s W. Ilalin Director JWP-.df Attachments : August 1 , 1978 staff report for �'.I'. a .A, 78-�I April 30 , 19:9 Request for Council Fsc;tian Minutes of M- y 7 , 1979 Council m4cet inU Resolution N:o. 4822 Yy. 1`t � y v Of l rev rmr'% JL bL IJ� . � t 0 Y R t!7 t f!1 a Y�. t � r G 4y A 1 .,. a ,� , , o- ..,..........,.......,,.e........r. .....,_........ .w_..,.._.,,.._..,.,.i....,a......_a.....�.._,�....,...d....�,. , ..� 7W 4TJ '00 ,awl.,awl..44 Tel Ir 4 A jr r.4,rrr .000 "L 706,!,far**0 erv-p-ft" Olovivd r r Yt ' d 4 Res• r }: �i♦'P 1t � R r+.l r f ,: 'r` .� �t70� Gili.l +$r r *• dx H+r+ .f{wS.r.Sn t x t i/'•"��{A ; ��• Y i:nrnr� t''OF,-,ORANGE 1 •.: , x'r- vita rEx 'CIT"if t3F.Y'HITI+R'ING'I'0!Y` DE:KCIi ' t , r rd i e •''w..,..r x 1.R it, ALICIA H.'- WEMORTIL the'-daily electrd, quxlified`'City A:r / F { Clerk `o£'theCitf a€. siuntingtvn Fetich; and ex-officit+ Clerk of the 3 ` r f City Council of said'Cit do heraby rertif,Y that the wh6le dumber of 14 ` member8 :cf- the , ty Council of the City ox ,ifuntington Beach is: Seven a that the foregoing resolution wan .passed and, adopted by the, affirnattive 1 vote of more than a majority of all the umbers of said City Cavncil at a regular meatin3 thereof held an the day �. of , 29.___,_;__, by the following vote: ' AYES: Councilmen: 1 :': , ' NOES: Councilmen: ti .Cy'£tt ABSEN7: Councilmn: City Clerk and ex•officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Iiuntingtor+ Peach, California I`I V }' JtY b �t L a: 0 EYMBITi iA #* t. No 16 m e 0 LAKE ':STREET� ro. ft r==_ 0 06 fe t4/ wz t ALAB;,MA STREET P.4ffClSjr Pt A Af ZW A&04CAP"dr#V r. .4NrA AVE : oRXMOE e "VIM dr .4xE . jrRerr Poo #v a 7s,'-z CITY OF HUNT i—mdv6k.il/kck i „ northwe3 terly, having a radius of ��350 .00 feet; a. radial r o t tt r b �o t saki point earl n r .h 1 3 4$ west* , northba terly along said curve 'through a centrel allgle of 39°19 '41” an arc dis tarce of . 240 -24 'fe+-t t' a reverse curve, conceive to the southeast' having a radius of 32:Q0' "h 4 feet; : thence northeasterly 'aIi • said,: reverse curve, ' ,. through :.a central angle -of 50.136 , 09" an, arc : distance 'of 28 .26 feet; thence north 50°25t5p1 east 38 .04 :feet -to :a curve concave to the south having a radiu's of 32 .00 'feet ; f `; thence northeasterly, easterly and j3outheasterly along said curve through a central angle of 81°34115" an are , distance of 45 .56 feet to a reverse curve concave to the it northeast having a radius of 377 .32 feet; trance south--, easterly and easterly along said reverse curve through a 4 4 c t tt central angle of 11 55 an are distance of 291.07 feet- thence g , thence north 70. 00 feet to the true point of beginning& h tile o 0> >e i Council t t o FAS ..D AND ADflF'TED City C u p ii f he CZ fHunt- ington S A Y Y Y Beac*z at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December , 1979 . Mayor , ...; A'ITE.. APPROVED M TO FORM. C l t y C e r k City A L+„o r ey R��V11-;Wi:t) Alit) AI'?'It Vt.i�: 1 UIIN AT 1:1) AM) APPROVKI1: CIty` �clr_ nIr.t�r< for /f .'�,;����������r;t' : :>i�:icc� � DIrc...c O:• R f. i.'Y•a 'x)o 7 t J, • t , r , RESOLUTION 140 . " .A .RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ol? :THE CITY � OF "flu NTZ NOTON BEACH ADO PTIN(; `PRECISE .PLA11 OF -STRERT'-ALIQNMENT NO. 79-2, ALTERNATIVE 110. y $, THE ALIG101E;NT- OF 'LAKE STREET: HEI'WEEtd ORANGE AVENUE; AND WALNUT AVFIIUE AND ATLANTA AVE11UE ACrWEE;N DELAWARE STREET AND., LAKE STREET " WHEREAS , pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law, parti- " cularly California Government Carle Section 65500 , the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Reach, after notice duly given, held 3 public hearing on April 17 , 1979 , to align pre- cisely Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake Street; and On May 71 1979 , After notice duly given , hearing was held before this Council , and the matter having been considered , the A Council finds that said Precise Plan 79-2 is reasonably neccs- nary to the orderly and efficient floss of traffic , for the pre- nervation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city, and for the orderly development of the cot;imunity, t1OWj TL HE:REi:ORE, 13E IT Hi?,SQLYF.D by the City Council of the City of 11tintington Beach that the real property, shown on the man narked E:xhibl" t "A" a: tached hereto , Incorporated hereln and by reference roade a part, hereof , in hi reby dc:,Ignated rand adopted ., ,. Pi-eel se Plan t1o . 79-2 cif' the "Fi ty of lhint3 n *,ton bench and r<7r)rt3 part.icc►.ilatil.y tit ;;cribel tics f'ollow,r; Tha partian of sectlons, 11 and 111 , Tura,."h1l, 0 sout-h , Fast f;e 11 W("ts t , In t ht! Rancho lA s 1301 sa s , city of ►1utitington i3eau,i3 , c;ourit1 of ortatij,P , .;trite of r`an-- forrrirr , as ;:shown on a mtri, recorded to [Inak 51 , Page 13 of ?srapr) In the ofi'it.e of the County t?ecor,_Iev or Bald County Ae%ster'lbed a" followU: f il . be 12/12/79 i i IJog I1t rllrIE tile'. Intcr�rsrrtioll or thr lii,rwi-ttou6, .. 1 ilnrt��r .se:ction . line: of nald S cctIon .l1. hnvirig a 0�� h��sl'rill of 'north, with the centerline of Atlanta } Averiilr, sin shown on a map or Uie VAnta f)P] Mar TrFsct recorded in . Book. I. Page 5 or Mi nceiiannotir< . maps, in . the orrice- of, the Count Recorder• thence, due east t along* said.: ;ceriterline, 205.25 fer:t to the true point of .beginning 'said, point being the intersection of the centerline of, Atlanta Avenue , and the southerly pro- longation o!' the.-east line of Alabama Street, a 60.00 foot wide, street as o id of i. . . , shown . n said map Vista Del Mar Tract , said east line also being the west line or Block 102 of said Vista Del Mar Tract; thence along said line north 79 .91 feet; thence south 89 °59132" west 60.01 feet to a nuntangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 32 .00 feet; thence south- westerlyl , westerly and northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 112002109" , an are distance of 62 .57 feet to a point on a compound curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 277 .32 feet , a radial to said point bears south 22001141" west; thence continuing along said compound curve through a central angle of 55007 ' 47" , an arc distance of 266 . 84 feet to a reverse curve concave to the southwest bav-- ing a radius of 377 .32 feet; a radial bearing to said point of reverse curvature bears south 77 °09 '2811 west ; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of V017141." an arc distance? of 179 .75 feet to a w rt reverse curve concave to they northeast having a radius of 32.00 feet , €t radial to said point bears nort}l 49° 51147" east ; thence northwesterly along, said curve through a central angle or 40 "08 ' 13" , an are distance of 22. 142 feet to a point on the Fast 3. ine of Lake Street , :shown as Railroad Avenue , 90 feet. In width , chclwn c,7n a rs 3p oi` ?Iuntirl�;tc►n F?��t�ch , recorded i n Rook 3 }��j�:��-' j O ' }'}� :iC:f' t iineous �'�..�ps : n �.: is Car ri ef. of the �`C�llitty Fiecorc,;e.'r of ai':1 County ; t,hf► ce west �i5.00 feet to the t,'!?nt;(.•rl i r;t.' of" �3 i �ti 1,a k�' " t s•E'�'t ; t}1�';1Ct'.' ;;t7ut.}1 "Along �`l f 1} centerline 1 j� � ! 1 I 1n rr / f 1 h 7 • ? f f' t t t it.lt{'f... w!. ., t t1 •00 f'+t. t 4Q EI ;)hint on tIse.' we., t 11ric of nald Lake :rtry t , said loci;nt }I+. 1tIE' tale► t;� Est rl��r' filc'rl �'t`?t•rser of' P1c3c�1c No - 301 gilts hoWTI oil zsald r•r.>ntlorlcd ;:;ti;, cif' Huntington is uach; thence 11Ont', :,{11d We, t t Ine south 178 .25 feet to -An tarigle 1),int. , L"I �I "Ingle paitlL, t)c'i rl , iris+'S':'a1"C L1 till of' the ' C51?t•}1t't't�, e:'r tens-11on of ;:aid we:it llnf! and the northeasterly t:erly ex- of' the c"Outhen"Iterl" 1tne of Plock No. 201 a ? nhowr, "xi : all I'lni ) of }Itltltingtt:frl Beach ; rE.l?ff sollt'.htd•a t.�vI�r � 11ne _ilno beln4; the hiss or Latte 4 t2'uct , t.;_:: .. . .� .�lsr ws•s {1.� First.- ,�7 L. �,c t onon ,slzi fl nap c,f' I{eintlnt,tcrr Beach ;t"he'�ric:e 41)*Gilth 41 °21 1 12" rY etn t.. , �1 •34 f eel ,i?nn F, w,a I d sot1tIi- ;`• citz' to 11ne a2l"Al its cxve'dIslon •' thence 3ollu}1 it6C38 ' 48�" east: .a nO -00 :'erect to a point. nil anontanr ent cut•ve , can,ave: ,.. .. 2 . ,s t {y ag Vt► « t:oun`cj i Minutc R° 5,/7/79 AUMINISTRATIVI St.f PAR AT, - CITYIt10 CMf LOYMI:ftl�'4 1IIAItiiflt� (RCA 7��1��' 77 lark firt •,c�ri t'.i•cl a crrrui;ucc i i��i t f tcn f"rcxri lljr C.a Ly' Acblii n i�.t r•,I I.ur• rc!Gcrlrncmd irlunr.nL OF:. t.hc! .11irntiri�1lirn ilr�ailc :E�r►filr►yrrtnclt. arch 7t'aIicfn+l .Aci�cinistr��tinrc ;,is: t III L tax-exc►coil, curjiura t ion f lc i s=wuu l cf d01 e+ to .the I. pusis 1 b 1 l i t 1 i t i . y ; Y for` CE1A:proyr�crris;°iri the city, flack to the Oraniae. County°tian ,wer Carniissiori, wiih ' the 'sfiipuiation- that_ all sucli monies "6 authorized annul ly by the ,City to. the 1'2 newl estabi.ished- cor oration for CEVV� rogram administration and:operations directed Y- P >a P to :Huntington Beach residents. -, Cctincilwarnan; Bailey, asked if other cities have implemented this, type of action and questioned 'i.he : Ci ty's financial respcnsibi l i ty. The Manpower Administrator stated' ' that an affirmative vote cn this item would indicate Council approval. in :concept and that staff. would prepare a contract that would spell out hosts and responsibilities of the proposed program. Counci)man MacAllister inquired as to whether this action would reduce the City's 4 adminisfiration costs ,, and the Manpower Ackninistrator stated it would reduce direct and indirect costs, one of which would be a reduction in liability insurance. On (notion by Bailey, second MacAllister, Council continued consideration of establish- ing the Ci(rntinytnn Beach Er4 to •gent and Training Adminsitration as a private, non- profit, tax-exempt corporation to the May 21 , 1979 meeting by the following vote: AYES: Pattinson, Mandic, MacAllister, Yoder 110F.S: Thomas ABSTAIN: Bailey ABSENT: None � ry PUBLIC HEARING PPSA 79-2 - ALTEIIfiAT1YE #B APP ROVED - NO 79-29 - AOOPTEO Mayer MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a public Clearing on Precise Man of Street Alignment No. 79-2 which is a proposal to precisely a) 3gn Lake Street between Oranrfe and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware and fake 5trc:4�t; . Also for cansidc=�`atio(r ti�ere ten different alternatives relating to this alitrurt +nL. The PlanningCrx'rici,sion rcictxr,�enJed Alter-native No. 10, The Council considered tie;lative Uc.�clai•t;tiuo tics. 79-29 In connection wit.411 the precise plan of ;tr•e+ t d rnment. The City Clvrk. infor•r+cd Council that al letjjI requirvii-,ent.s for publication, notif ieatiott and rusting had aeen met and that she had received no coersinica;.ions or written protests to the matter. The Actiny Planning Director tlreseir,ted a vewir+aph depicting Alternative Nos. 10 � 4A and 4. tiro presented an ex1lanation of each alternative. Mayor KicAl I inter derlet,!d the hearing opcn. Mr. dim Van f1�tr}►Y %;:rt addr•,�s 4c�d Ctxl;lL i l artici s f i tti�d Crr,1 t irt� scrtrt;ctrted tfx+� t 1 ttjrrrd t i vc• t-ecorinended by a t.a ff. There being no orin further present, to speak on the r,,Itter and there tieing no further Pretests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. J, 14 Co. up ' ►C4 it Minutes 5/7/79 + The ;Director ►�f Publ is". Works . �pokP reyarding "the ramifications ,'of Alternative � -A nroti on, was''made°by ,Yoder, ,seconded by MacAl l i s ter• to approve, Alternative.No.-,4A.. ,{ Yhe` iriotion failed" the fallowing vote':' ;. AYES: MacAllister; Yoder . i 'NOES: Thomas` Mandic,: Bai l e ; y ABSTAIN: Pattinson ,.,. a B5EtiT None ' A motion was made" by -Mandic:, seconded by Bailey to approve A]tr:rnative No. 6. 1a, = Follewing discussion, the motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Mandic { NOES: : . Thomas, - MacAllister, Dailey, Yoder ABSTAIN: Pattinson ABSENT: None A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by MacAllister, to approve Alternative e #8 The motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey NOES: Thomas, Yoder ABSTAIiI: Pattinson ABSENT: Aare VP On ration by Bailey, second Thomas , Council adopted lieciative declaration No. 79-29, .a approved Precise Flan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 - Alternative Iro. 8, and directed t the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance reflecting said alignment. Motion carried unanimously, with Councilman Pattinson abstaining from the vote. PKA 70-4 REVOCATION - ORD NO 2369 - INTRODUCED the City Clerk presented a cotiviunication from the Planning Uepartrr,ent relative to Ordinance No. 1633 which viauld revoke Precise Plan of Street Aligrylent No. 70-4 the a1 igrtrrWnt of ( 1 ) Atlanta Avenue frcx,,. 1265' west of beach Uoulevard W take Street, (2) Lai:e Street. between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Niyhway and (3) Olive Avenue betweei Lake Street to 135' west of 2nd Street. On March 1.9, 1979 a public hearing .4as held on this ratter with decision continued to consider in corijunction with Precise flan of Street Al igtr.ient No. 19-2. The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2360 try title - "A'I ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HU�IIINGTO`l DEACII AMENDING, TNr IWINTINGiVI ;3 ACH ORDINA-1iCC CODE BY REE'Et?t1P;G ORDINANCE 110. 1633, A`i 1'►'Q'DIIiEIIT TO DISTRiCT NAP 16." O r� i , n Ki ndi Council approved introduction f Ordinance .ra � rn t €�a i l ,,tr d � c t� c o t se Pr y •Y Y 9 No. 2360 b the following vote .. AYES: Mandic. MacAllister, Bailey, Ycrier ,1,4. .. .. , I11?£S: 1 tea s ABSTAIN: Pattinson ' A0SU47 : Ilene a } l +u:(� lot ✓ ! f 1 ATC yT {�r C G ` "PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 77. - 3. t A.LTERNATE . 1Q ' AT L At 3TA /LAKE Y, OA � � 1 Af :�5fdt=S _ RClEItLNCES CITY Of HUh41NGiO�1 ;ifA:Nw.•+, .•r € P?iCZS F�i�h of 5:S :'?^ _-•-. . €MSTING. COMMON--— F.ft ALT. ,E;.T 78-4 AT.%A?+TA/LAFr r • • I- s . +� ,r t ,1 z' r . � ! '•i �ji;��`•. � ^� {1/1�.,:,,, � {� 1 �•..� �� ,71 !1 f• y '� t ;t = ! t ' +.: � ;�„�,• ,�. r' � :t 'M�i '.l :l = Jt 77 ,y• �,• t i n'. � 10 SO Xi- f ".� '�o ,? , •, .., '�� / ', �:: ` tit j � t' CC t J; i t � ,�:I t ..`� �`- .,,� ►�,, I .•ail:, � �� I • - 't 'a • Z. � ;I % . r hl.l11f1!1g lon beachlJICl�ltllll CG�JC �`�nl`C� lt `� , f r PhSA, 79- MIC h • ttN' I1niYr.N .IIY.: tt)ill.W J1NU BY -.111(,t,iNS .NI•.i,h i i V1. i , 1�ri; tAs Atx)1 n Eu BY 'I II>. :i`oLLuW`xNc .vorr.. } AYES: Eligg�ns, Russell, Finley, t.ohen, Faone N4>rS: one ABSENT. . Stern, Basil FUNDING SUURCE: , Not applicable. . ; • ALTEP-NATIVE •-ACTION_: The -Council, may consider any of the other. alternatives . tihat were submitted, to the. Planning Commission. on April 17,, 1979. Each of?. . � tn�.1 eleven alternatives are part of the attached staff, reports and. each has bc,!'n analyzed • for both advantage; and disadvantages. t'SUePOgTING INFORftAT,,X•nN: I Area Mag 2: Planning Commission :Staff Reports dated August 1, 1978, 7 979 ri 1 1 A 1 a.r 3. Negative Declaration No. 79-29 Respectfully submitted, ames W. Palin Acting Secretary JWP r SMB:gc i. It ' REVUE . F CITY 11N IL ACTION ntD_._��_.... rvaces - Planning ,Submittedb DepartmeJames .11. Paliny Date P: fed A'`ril 9 19 79 Backup M` ia1 A tech Yis. No P , _._. P Ater t ed . ' 'Subject ALTERNATIVE PRECISE ,PLAN OF STREET' ALIGNMENT TO REPLACE EXISTING PRECISE PLAN NO. 70-4 City Adrllinistrator's Comments ` Approve . as recommended . �°• , Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: An alternative street alignment for the intersection of Lake Street and II Atlanta Avenue to replace existing Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70...4. - RECOMMENDED ACTION: Continue Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70--4 to the May ? , 1979 ; City Council meeting. I ANALYSIS : At the March 19, 1979 City Council meeting at the time .Precise . Plan ' of Street. Alignment No. 70-4 was before the Council for public -iicaring, the item'.: %-.as continued to April 16 to allow the Planning Deb artment to on again set the alternative designs on the intersection of Lake and Atlanta before the Planning Commission at a public hearing for a recom- mendation to the Council concurrently with your. action on P.P.S .A. 76-4 . The Department was unable to get this new alignment (79-1) before the Planning Commission for its April 3, 1979 meeting and it has subsequently oeen . set for review for recommendation by the Commission at `its April 17 meeting. Therefore, if the Council wishes to hear Precise Plan of Stre-it Alignment No. 79-1 in conjunction with , 70-4 , it will' be necessary' to continue the hearing over to allow this new intersection . design to catch uZ., with the prior precise plan. The propert;. ourner who r appeared before the Council and the Commission in regard to '!:his mattor has been informed of this delay. The staff will be prepared to respond for additional clarification if , necessary at your April .16 ,` 1979 treeting . R pectfully s tea, _.t,- ,- -;7 v 'antes W. Palin, ,meting Planning Director JWP: t t f , • ' 7 G' i3r f ° M.. �. y+ { .e.k;' ,SKI x ; t • t � "� � 4': ` • • •i E t ear t. ' f ` _t. , , ' i � 8P.0 i T Planning: C6mmiss'16n FltUM: planning Department r :DATE: August' J, 1978 }` PROPOSED `ALTERNATIVES .,FOR PRECISE PLAN OF •5«'.�iEET , 'ALIGNMENT NO. ' 78--4 , (ATLANTA/LAKE) 1. 0 SUGGESTEDnACTION: Staff recommends that' the Planning Commission: 1 .. `Select Alternative 3 'or 9 as the preferred alignment. 2 . Di.rect,'staff. to set-, Precise Plan of. Street Alignment Uo. : 78-4 f6r 'public hearing at the September G , 1978 meeting . 2 0 '. GENERAL; INFOM'NTION: On July 'S , 1978 , the Planning Commission adopted ,Resolution of Intention 'No. � 1225 initiating proceedings to revoke .Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70•-4 and to adopt a new precise plan for the inter-� s 'ction 'of Atlanta Aven•je and J.alke Street. This report presents a r E ten 10 alt-ernel-Aves that have been considered b• the' summa y o all , e ( ? ! ., P: an'ning Commission to date.' rnclucted in the report is �•� drawing of each alternative , a ;discussi6n, of the advantages and clisadvantages of each alternative, )nd the associated estimated .'cost to implement .each alternative. f , 3 . 0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES : The primary areas of concern with regard to these Previse Plan alternatives are as follows : (1 ) The 'impact of the alternatives on local circulation patterns . In particular, the impact on east/'west circulation and downtown! beach access . (1� The cost of implementating the alternative, .including riyht' o£-sway acquisition, relocation, and construction. . _( 3) Engineering 1easibilit `of the alternatives , including :safer Y. , considerations . r 7 ! - >PRtCI5�: 'PI+AN 'OF•,STREET ALIGNMENT :NO. aY , + 4: q -ANAt;S*IS:' Pr'Vt:ise Plan '-of 5tr at AII'diimrn 'Ho . 70�-4 was -adopt6d in February , r • •1971 , and was intended ko' provide a direct east/west connection bet .. oneh Boulevard . and' Goldenwest Street utilizing Atlant.-� Avenue iid �7 once-way. couplet .composed of Orange Avenue and Olive :`Avenue .. Althouilh ' the goal. of improving , east/west . c.1rculdtion in the downtown rea h.as `been retained, the concept of the-gone-way couple-t , which was an integral part ;of , the Top-of-the-Pier Plan,.`.`has been deleted from khn Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and highways. As a result , PPSA 70-4 no longer. . : rdflects the City ' s circulation plans• and objectives. `tn '1977 , the Planning . Staff ,developed five alternatives for a new precise plan for Atlanta and Lake. All five alignments called ' for a 100. foot width on Atlanta (presently 60 feet wide) with the additional `right-of-way coming off the 'south side. Three of the alternatives pro- vided a direct connection between Atlanta and Orange, accomplished by a curving Atlanta northward between Huntington Street and Lake. Alternative 4 -corresponded essentially to the: existing configuration, with Atlanta intersecting .Lake at right angles . Alternative - 5 proposed to terminate at Atlanta , which was to curve southward to intersect with ` Pacific Coast Highway utilizing the existing Lake Street right-of-w.-ly : At its June 22 study session,, the. Planning Coirunission directed staff. ` to prepare additional alternatives .based on the following criteria : . ,4 '(1) the Atlanta Avenue right-of-way should .be 80 feet wide; ► : (2) a• direct connection should be provided between Atlanta and Orange ; (3) impacts 'on developed parcels vn .the north side of Atalanta should be minimized. Pour new alternatives (Alternatives G , 7 , Q and 9) wer'e developed .by staff and .presented ,to the Planning Coinmissi.on at the July 184h meeting : These alignments iiivolve significant design problems due to undesirable curve radii and sight distances . An alignments that provided an adequate radius would necessarily have a greater impact on developed' parcels on. ' the north. side of Atlanta, since the curve would begin at a paint closer to Huntington Street. Therefore, choosing Among these alternatives involves a tradeoff between design safety/traffic flow considerations and the cost of right-of-way acquisition and relocation. The following discussion presents a summary of each of the toll alternative alignments that have' been previously considered by the. Planning Commission. 4 . 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 would provide a 100 toot wide right-of-way and would tie realigned north to intersect with Orange Avenue at Lake Street . The 100 .foot. wide right--of-way would be maintained to 3rd Street at which . r • v 7 s I r q ri ;,�:;, •r t. r r ' ,. I '+ • 4' J> r r"•. .t i t 1 ! _,. r r q; ti t ;PRECISE rIsLAW;b STREET :AL1GNM9N1• N: 'O. 18--4 4 Page :i,raiIi khe riyhE of,-carry would rar�r'iirue= at i -i; presuint w1c!`tri of ?.'► 't'i��•C. f ,!'hr.: n yiimank aulid.ixec uir.e pi�rGhalcec of :prvEiert:y ^anel ri. loc•it'.�ot� :ut s�; r. i •� persons" living" in ':iorrsirly, structue ��;� : lyiriy':w.i t , li t1�0 :•oposod riijhtwodf way, , 'Alternatav0 lr. wou'l.a .`.ti;.rn. enkni 1 ..tl:0 e:iil d%wsuR•Ihij �hrce :Local streets . Alabama Street: would ;"We cal-de-s61C4d'•wheru tt. ' �nri:rsects :.with `At3.anta. Avenue: Ind Skreei: and �1ive Street would lie.►' . , ' cul-de'-sated. at..Lake Street. 4 . 1: 1 Alternative 1`�Advantages 1. Provides'.an east/west connection between Beach ` Boulevard and Goldenwest Street. 2 . Provides . a "parallel street to Pacific Coast Highway that will relieve traffic congestion along Pacific Coast Highway. $r 4 . 1. ? '•Alteinative l Disadvantages 1. . Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from . resi.dential units•, 4 . 2 Alternative, ,2 provides for Atlanta Avenue to. be designed at a1.30 foot right-of-way and swing , north to . intersect ,with' existing Orange Avenue at Lake Street. This ali�rtment does not`:require the purchase of land west of Lake Street: as is , the ; case under. Alternative 1 . However, the Alternative '2 a, f'gnment W 'Id 'require: the acquisition of more 'land past of Lake. Street. 4 . 2.1 Alternative 2 Advantages 1 . Provides -a direct east/west connection between Beach Dou lava ra a'Ad Goidenwest Street. 2 . Would not require acquisition of properties ; west of Lake ' St:reet. ; 3. provides a parallel street to Pacific `Coast Highway . 4 .2 . 2 Alternative 2 Disadvantages 1 . Cost may be prohibitive . 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential- units . 4 . 3 Alternative 3 „+ Alternative 3 partially recognizes the financial and Is' inn cast.; that are' characteristic of Alternatives 1 and 2, by providing `for. fewer residences to be relocated. Alternatives 3 prov' ides ifor a 100 • foal• r iyht-of-way using the existing curb line on the `nor^�:h side of /ltlatit:a Avenue, as the north boundary of the, Atlanta Avenue Street section . � ' ► Vx.Londing from Teach ' Boulevard to intersect ' Lake Street;. half way between . orange Avenue and Olive Street . 1 { `.t'RECI5C :PLANY OF STREW:' " ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 r } Alternative -3 , hi le it does. riot,`.provi"i3e fora direct: conne6ttibn be.t een 1 a a . 5 o 11tl4Inl ,i Avenue and grange l�venue , c..�n he dcs�gned to permit m th £ivw .or t.raf fit 'be!tw en . the 6io stretit:. throuc}h the 4rst:als`iishment: Y a 5>9nalization L+rogram. ' � .fr6pi:r siyri.-1l.; 011asing betwi:en'.�rai�dea;(-In(l ; ,{ 'AL-IanLa* ;would accomplish .the_'go��l `of . providing for impi-'aved e� st:/west :r tra,i f f ic, ,f io,W , between ' Beac}i Boulevard acid'Golden w4s t . ALti-nitive 3 would require the cul-cie-:;ac:ii�y of D1`ive Averue`tand �. Y 2nd Street. 4 . 3 . 1 Alternatilve 3 Advantages -1. While .total .cost continues to, be high, . a reduction 'in acquisition, relocation and construction costs ewer Alternatives 1 and 2 are realized: 2. Relocation of residences would be lessened . 3. . The goal of developing improved east/west traffic :low between -Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized. 4 . Minimizes 'impact on property on northwest 'corner of Atlanta and Alabama 4 . 3 . 2 Alternative 3 Disadvantages 1 . Potential for traffic delays ;f1. t 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential 'units . Ut ,� 4 . 4' Alternative 4 Alternative' 4 provides for continuation of the existing alignment and taking an additional 40 feet from the property on the south side of Atlanta Avenue, thus - providing a 100 foot right--of-way. , A signalization , program as discussed under Alternative 3. would be est; bliShed. Olive , Avenue and 2nd Street would be cul•-de-sated under Alternative 4 . 4 .4 . 1 Alternative 4 Advant:ages, 1 . While total, cost continues , to be high, a reduction in acquisition, relocation and construction costs over Alternatives 1 and 2 are realized., 2 . Relocation of residences would be lessened . 3 . 'Che goal of developing improved cast/west traffic flow betwcoll -Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized . 4 . Minimizes impacts on property on northwest corner of. Atlanta and ,; Alabama . Oka. I PRECISE ';PLAN OF STREET'.ALIGNMENT NO* ' 78 4` ". •. �� aije. 5''"'' - i . 4`:'2 Al.ternat`ivc:4 ,Disadvdhtages, 1 . Potenti al'"'for traffic delays 2. : Uprootiny and relocation or �iersons from 'residential `units . 4 5 Alternative 5. l r v t to a i x y co A n t 5 i di.f f e t concept s ern r e t o t fir he st fouralternatives P , In that it 'does :not provide for the direct Atlanta/drange.. link. Atlanta : is proposed to swing southward to' 'Pacific Coast ,Highway , utilizing the existing Lake Street right-of;way. Lake would curve eastwira and terminate in a "T" intersection , at. Atlanta . As a : result, this alternative would 'cieemphasize Lake Street as d ' primary arterial and ;favor Atlanta Avenue . Beach traffic would tend to utilize Atlanta as .an ,access route to and from Desch boulevard. This configurration would 'do very* little to improve east/west . circulation or downtown access. Alternative 5- is the least expensive of the propr,sed alignments ,, - : . since it ' impacts vacant land. It also provides for increased traffic safety,-since the configuration would involve fewer vehicular con-- flicts than the others . The alternative would require the construction of .a cul-de-sac on alive Avenue. 4 .5'. 1 Alternative 5 Advantages t� 1. Least costly alternative. 2. Superior design features and intersection configuration. 3. Minimizes impactt on property on northwest comer of 'Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . Provides s1ightly , improved .Beach access in .- the event Lake is not extended north . 4 . 5. 2 Alternative 5 Di.sadvantages . 1 . Does not improve east/west circulation or improves downtown acCedss. 2 . Interrupts Lake Street traffic. 3. Uprooting and relocation of- persons from residential units . 4 . 6 Alternative -6 This alternative provides for yen eighty foot it 1 i(I nment on letla►;ta; ; curving northward starting at a . point about . 340 feet west of th,11 Center line 'of Huntington Street .. The radius of this curve' is ..400 feet for n design speed of,.35 mph. , The intersection' of . Atlanta and wou d. �invo ve , a . tri�atryular .arrzingement to. accommodate turning 'move rtrer�f s.t D,-cause of s.is-rt:. dirt:rt4t� E�robleW.s ,Ind. undes i rabl.r: • intor yc��•ct., nf: -r.== # igus~��t. :. .. ._ .al-cie-i;ac: on 2nd Streeti acid Alabama ` Street a ons t . h '� - are�'Oroposed 'as, part of this p:ecise plan. '1�ltF:C tG ,'hLAN C?I•' S'1'lZk:trT ALIGNMENT 11q. 78-4 ,. { A 1 L Y 'idt iv6: t� would ;neces'si.tatt: 'the acquisition-or one detacitiird , 14I'ng, on .'the '�north'east -`corner. �af. ':Atlanta ind*'Alabama and s.i-xteen mot�i;le;.homes >.on tt a `south side of Atlanta east of.� Huntingt- h Streek . The remaa,ndar.. of ,the right�nf-way nee dead , is currer.;zly" vacant. A: ortion of the existing Atlanta right-of-way,,would-be dccliired surpIW3 and. ;`sold ,to : paxtially `offset the .'acquisi-tion cost: 4 . 6. 1 Alternative 6 'Advantages . , 1. —:Better design (curve radii, sight distances) that► Alternative- 7. and"s 2: .. Establishes Atlanta/Orange connection " to improve- downtown . , c. -`w t access,,,, ast est circula xon ' 4 . 6. 2 Alternative G Disadvantages . a. 1, cost may, be prohibitive. 2 . :Involves reloca t::on -of residences . ; 3. Design is:.less desirable than Alternatives 9-and 10 . 4 : 7' Alternative 7 Alternative 7 is similar ' to V fi in concept , but is designed to. avoid cocnpleLely the developed properties north of At Uri ntzi In .order to accomplish this, the needed curvt- . radivis is approximately 325"` feet. 'Phis alternative also shifts Orantjo Avenue s.l,ightl.y do the south. dn'd. requires the acquisition of one unit oil the southwest corner ' o ���► Orange and Lake. As with ,alternative 6 , cul-de-sacs are prolmsed, on. . 2nd Street and Alabama Street . 4 . 7 . 1 Alternative 7 Advantages 1 1 . Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Minimizes impact on :property on northwest " corner of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . 1 . 2 Alternative 7 Disadvantages .1 . very' poor design features (curve radii , sight, distances; . 2 . Poor intersection design .at Lake Street . 3. ' Costlier. than Alternatives 6 and 10, 4 . Involves re.l.ocation of re,;dences . , 4 : B Alternative 8 t; This, alignment is the most radical "design proposed providing for... 1 curve radius of 3GD feet ' and a design" speed ;of about 30 mph.. It.: . therefore represents a trade off in- favoxo of low cost at the expense of safety and smooth traffic . flow. Cut- de-sans would be Constructed .on 2nd Street and ,Alat�dma. . t + Pt.`ECI5E ;PLAP� OF' S�'�tEETALIGNMEN'r N0 ; 7$ '4 , _ 91 "h i•�'� - flit t 1 .4 'A •11 'Atlternc ti Vf= '•� AQ VaIY t•rlye,i1 - - k {. .•A l . :'Accom I J.slies AtlaiiLa Orange connect tptY. 4 8 .2 'Alternative 8 n `1)is�dvAntayes " l 1. Wighly.,undesirable i:urve radii, sight :diskances- and - intersectidiv.: , # : configuration. Could "nose signif icanti safety' problem: 2. Involves . relocat16' of 'res:idences . ' 4 . 9 Alternative 9 ' Alternative-9 is a much .Pore ' moderate design than the previous three, ' providing or curve radius of 800 feet. This necessitates *beginning the curvature at a point about 130 feet west of the center. line 'of Huntington Street, resulting in severe impacts on •deveio ed ro art .9 9 P • � p � P Y, •north of, Atlantu . It is estimated that at least twenty-onr: : units I�rouTd 1 be affected and require ', re'ccation.- As a � result, this alir�nmeta i:5 . ' the most expensive of the ten alternatives . 4 9 . 1 Alternative .9 Advantages 1 . Accomplishes Atlanta,/orange connectiors. 2 . Design features are superior. This is-, the best alternative from a traffic, flow/circulation point of view. 4 . 9 . 2 Alternative 9 Disadvantages 1 . Costliest of all alternatives . 2 . Involves substantial relocation . 4 . 10 Alternative 10 Alternative 10 provides for exactly the same design as is shown in Alternative 5 , with the exception t.ha't the right-of-way .width west of Huntington Street is 80 feet . Tile same advantage, and disarlvantages that were indicated under Alternative . 5 apply to Alternative 10 . Alternative 10 overall cost may lie, the least of 'all 'alternatives+ including Alternative 5 since riq t:-of-way acquisition (Ind construction cost would be reduced by the difference between a 100 feet right-of-way and 41n 80 foot right-of-way ., , i toImCI SE,, PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 1►icjc . 4 . 11 Cost. Summary Alternative Right-of-Way . Relocation Lake: 'St . Construction 'Total Acquisition fxistiny 11700 , 000 2$6 , 000 '340 ,000 .370 ,000 -2 ,696 #06V, 1 740 # 000 2561'000 343 , 000 - 220 ,000 1 , 556 ,000 2 830, 000 266, 000 340 , 000 220;000' 1 , 056boo 3 500 , 000 240, 000 '340 ,000 206 ,000.. 1, 28n1:000 4 506 , 000 240, 000 340 ,'000 . 2101000 11290 ,000 5 591 , 000 240 ,000 0 230 , 000 11061,'000 6 705 , 000 255 , 000 340 , 000 180,000 1 , 480j000 7 675, 000 255 , 000 340 , 000 200 , 0.06 11470 , 600 8 600 , 000 255 , 000 340 , 000 180;000 1 , 3751000 0 875 , 000 298 , 000 343 , 000 180, 000 1 , 693 , 00W' ', 10 591, 000 240, 000 0 230 , 000 : , 061 , 0001 . " D am ' 419 Jr•&z O r.ry T q- i M *� �• 3 : `� ` �.j J "R .. ....�=�..- is r a�_.M' • •. �. L' /'r-•. ♦vt�vu i ' a `-is/ r•..- _ _ � _ �'�..��: -_......._�'�•"•s� _.. _ _ _.._ k � o REviS1ONS RFi Eli II"CES �wlC ,W �'� �• — - '-'_ _:. ::-_ _._— _.._.__ "..__. . .�,.�..�..��..�.... M . r.,,,.,,,_,._,_,_. ��r� 7.,eY .rrc_e.r1f fir_ _ _ ._ t1iT Of H50tL1NGiON DfACH EXISTING;'' CONDITION' PRECISE PLAN OF STREF.T ALIGV*lENT 78-4 _ ATLANTA/LA. � rt, ! D is _ • _ i' '1 L' Rtv�S1pN5_ - _ RZF it(NCEs ol { " _ ,i : ate'�r �f�G ty�/ - ' r�. }�� ,. ,�fAa � ♦ - -• - ' .40 i .; P It IVFStoms [lEfERtt10ES . .._ , • , or tp r.. l` ,✓.1 _ �` ors•�.-! � t 4 IttKISIONS REiEREMCES f ._ t. . ALTERNATIVE ' � . + .. .. .. � .. Kam. • i o;� z io . REftILIHCES �t iSla s _ _ ALTERNATIVE A' y • •` /%, IN E ,. _ ,. •f REvtSl01+3 REfER1NC[S ALTERNATIVE 5 ! ., . .. .t�. .. '1 . .. , • ` �r" RE�?tJ �' I~C CITYCSC UNCIL �►C i /;;uuinitted-EfyDepartment UeveIo e::t 5c� v ' c�r;. 79 Y0s No Uute Pre a :ce1 , 19 E3ackup Mntor�al1 Attach Sutajc:ct , t,Ac I £ PLIt� 't31' �'fltGy'C: LGUM _t1T �?'. PRE('.*ISE ALIGNMENT .OF ATLAN'�t'A -AVENUE BEj1WEFN nPLAWARE STRE:! �t`; fait) LAKE STREET AND LAKE STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE-AND WAt. Nt '! City Administrator's Comments A• provc as rcrommenc}etl - r Statement of lu!ae, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,�Aiternative Actions. . ww wwrwr.wrr+rwr ST TEMENT ©F ISSUE: i Transmi t�.ted for consideration is Precise . Plan of Street Alignment -;_- , 7n-2, which is the alignment of Atlanta Avon►ie, . between No Dulawarc� Street and Lake Street . and Luke; Street between orange: Avenue .end Walnut avenue. RF.CtlMMENDATIf)El 'Phe Planninq Commission is recommending that. the City Council app; OV0 Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2, AItern�- ►tive lfl and .d%refit ordinance "reflecting said the, City Attorney s office to prepare an o a alignment . j ANALYsxs . Applicant : Initiated by City councl1 Location : Intersection `of Lahti .Street and Atlanta Avenue }tesluest : Establish the alignment of At Iantiv. A tie nue, Met:ween Delaware Street: and bake .Striiet and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Aven►�e. send their intersection. PLANNING COKMISSION ACTION ON APRIL ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND UY PAONE, 'Pitt: COMMIS,IUtt + PItECISE PLAN OF 5'TttE�e.T AlSIG:=MEN'i !iC?. 79- 2 7Y). '1'flE. CIT1' t'OUNG i L. .FQtt APOPTION WITlt ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT' !'fin. 10 QETNG `I'UIE RECC?tU�ft;Nt7E:n Ct7V- ' F16URATION IN G`JktCEPT ONLY BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higclins, Rt►ssell . ' Finley, . Cohen. Plaonc: � �r ES"; None ANSENT: Stern. . Haxil rin urR , • PPSA Addit1ional'. action taken at1 that Meeting was the Adoption of , Resolution . 1246: AijY oil "140TIQN AX 1' TONE AND SECOND. BY PAONE, RESOLUTION NO. 1246 AS AI MENDED To REFLECT, ALTERNATIVE NO. 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN-- MENT' WAS ADOPTED BY THE` FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : ,Higgins, Russell , Finely,,'Cohen, Paone NOES : None AQSENT: Stern, dazil - DISCUS§ION In 1970, the City Council adopted Precise Plan of Street Alignment . No. 70-4 , : which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue between Deiawa>"e Street and Lake Street rind Lake . Street , - between Orange Avenue and .Walnut Avenue. This alignment as adopted, • hab never been constructed ' andiafter numerous discussions, the City Council has recommended that this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a new precise plan be established for this alignment. At the ;March 19; 1979 City Council meeting', the Council directed the Planning Comauission to review alternative alignment designs and report back- to the Council with its recommendation for a new precise plan for this intersection., ' On April 17. 1979, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79--2. At this . meeting . '"` the Commission reviewed ten alternatives and a variation of one ?;Y of those alternatives . The ten alternatives reviewed were the same as those presented to the Planning Commission as part of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 . After reviewing all eleven of the alternatives, the Planning Commission selected Alter- native No. 10 to be presented to the City Council as the conceptual 'design for. the Lake Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment. Attached are both the staff reports from Precise Plan of -Street Alignment -No. 78-4 dated August 1„ 1978 , and from Precise Plan of . Strad Alignment No. 79-2 dated April 17 , 1979. The original, ten alternatives are discussed in detail in Precise plan of Street Alignment No. 78--4 , while Alternative 4A is discussed in Precise Plan of. Street Align- ment. No. 79-2. .UVI&C!N 4E G STATUS: Rrerise Plan of :street Alignment. No. 79--2 wa ; assessed For t:nvirunm�•nt •, 1 effects under NegaLivc Declaration No. 79-211. This negaLi ve' aerlara t ion addressed all ten of the proposed a Ito rnat Ives- Wcgati.vo Duclat o tiun No. 79--29 was posted for the prescribed lanyth of' time 'in Lhe Office of the City Clerk and the Bunt:ington Beach Indcipend�:nt. NO comments were received by the Planning Department, either in writing or oral . during or after the porting period. ' •`a Q' P PS,A 79- w . e IL re i 611 MOT lUN 1)Y VoIlEO 13Y. 111C IIN.S- Nh(;ATI VE 1t1a'1�1�111�'1'1ttN ' 79. 29, WAS,: ADOPTE1) UY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYESs Higgins, . Hussell, Finley; Cohen; Paone NOES i None ABSENT: Stern, ' HaziZ . FUNAING SOURCE: }`I > „ Not applicable ALTERNATIVE -ACTION: ' The Council tiay consider any, .of the other alternatives that were i submitted to the Planning Commissioan on April 17, , 1979. Each 'a£. the 'eleven alternatives are park , of the attached staff reports and each •'has .been analyzed for Wth advantages and 'disadvantayes. N SUPPOR PING ZNFURtIATIt�: 1� I. Area Map . 1 9.78 commission Staff Reports dated August 1 , , 2. Planning Commi s. i P April 17 , 1979 3. Nega:ive . Declaration No. 79_29 Respectfully submitted, fames -W. Pali n Acting Secretary ,7WP:SMH:gc . • •i AL i f1 � r , , •. ,'r i S .'.. '. ., .i • / r,I �!• y ��..� l�k •r �. e� I'1 �1 ,lf'• .r�/ "� 1 r, .. :.7 ' (,,�t:(,I'It �r� "n'� •�� !1 111 !t( !! tt � r�t � � � 1 •� `t� ''• �• y , ; ,-�. , , '��`' ,� .. .. //'! i ( ��, t 1. 'I= � l.• tt ' � � .. �` .�/CJ�'�� , if ,• ' � �f ,� �� . f��I'��� �� 1 ' •".. .• ` •; yam" I . .) .5 - ;,�.p to I M Mi •p •, asy • • • .N•.1 •./ r .. % •;�� ��'• .`.! •fir •[�•/ , I »; � 1 �. ±� ,I - '( '` ''� •I�j�'� ~ �,` i - ! �� `�,/ •''• r,�•t` !Y{1,".."I 'Ml._ I ll � 1 �� i 1, � - t ,V! r +N • f 1 1 «� •a tf/( •`� _ .� ,�� f � :. '�, �,, ♦ ••,...-. '. _1. .../1 V`n!•1/.. !�`�F.ir ter« _... • ' -'y'y' �r /'1! ` .c• ' 'l'y�/`�t ',•,�<,. ,1, I 1.• ' IJ� ''•,w�l� � '(� •'J' 1 '��'�t �4 •+•, ��i,'�• �,•, '�t!�����. / /t ' sr1. pRf3JEG7 '�t�iC� ,+ Ls R2-PD I• ` •�,, ,,` G3 ' C,,c� ' •1 1 �.�.:���..:�. 1•t-�,ta �;�. `art-- �.. .: huntington beach IDIOnning depar1i ent f ,.•.,1 ;� N. ` wr +` _ ___1• r�!ra.wr. 1t �g• • 3� �� .. - _ - . .. _ 1' �� .. _ _ _ ray'•~ ��• �I'� If�•� _.. .. R_ .•.. .' _..,�.. ��.....'•` - .�._. " '�".... � _` '" _ _ r �.. e��/.vS'�"J+nC�i'r11:'dY�,7•;+, 9t:�ti�! �'..�`f_..._ �.- EXISTING NDITION' F'�? CI SE PLAN OF S:'3?EET AI.FGi:'iE1�'r 7 8-4 � ' _ R t ; o� � i t i _ ;7j � - 1 I Ri PRECISE . PLAN OF STREET AL1C--" MENT. • 77 - 3. A �, TE �t '�tATF 10. AT ANTA i L AK E I'age 71r Counci I Minute #/7/79. r /1MfItIISTIE11i;iI►'E SIPARKTION CIT�iI(3 FMf'I.pYMI:NI Yitl�tlr1Nr �R(:A 79-10 Titre C I rrk pre-w.n t.rd a Ctninil��r i r.�r t i can frtrnr that .C i ty 'llth i n i s tr,r tur r vt:r,r«n1!nd 1 nq till! " cis t;rtrl i 011it'it t 01'' LhP ilr;n I irnl ton livach E:nyr loymvia. anrl Tra i n i nit A(iiri iti s tra t foil tu,. ,A {�riva!e, nosy-profit tax-exempt. cur portitidn. This ti`n)uld Je►Ivii t.e th�� r� r r ' I e.5p�� 5rlrility for CETA progr�rins in the c f ty [lack to the Oran jo Co ,nty ianpower• C(landss ion, eii th the stipulation that all such moiniet be authorized annually by the City to 'the newly-established corporation for CETA program administration and operations dfrrx fed to Huntington (leach residents. Councilwoman Bailey asked if-other. cities have implemented this type of action' acid questioned the City's financial responsibility. The Manpower Administrator. stated that an affirmative vote at) this, item would indicate Council approval iri concept and that staff Would 'prepare ,a contract that would spell out costs and responsibilities. of the proposed program. Councilman MacAllister inquired as to whether this action would reduce the City's administration costs , and the Manpower Administrator states it would reduce direct and indirect costs , one of which would be a reduction .in liability insurance. On motion bv : BaileY. second MacAlli�ter, Council contin ued consideration of establish- ing the Iirnntinytun Beach Employment and Training Adminsitration as a 'private, non- profit, tax-exempt corporation to the May 21 , 1979 meeting by the following .vote: AYES: Pattinson, Mandic, MacAllister, Yoder .140FS: Thomas ABSTAIN: Bailey ABSENT: None f PUBLIC HEARING - PPSA 79-2 - ALTERNATIVE #8 APPROVED - QED 79-29 - ADOPTED Mayor MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a' public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 which is a proposal to precisely align j Lake Street between Orange and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware and Lake Streets . Also for consideration were ten different alternatives relating to this 'alignment. The Planningg Cunanission reconr<rrended Alternative No. 10. The Council ctrnsidered Negative Declaration No. 79-29 in connection with the precise plan of street alignment. The City Clerk inforined Council that all legal requirements for publication, notification and posting had been met and that she had received nr% coamnications or written protests to the matter. The Acting Planning Director presented a veiwgraph depicting Alternative Nos. 10 4A and 4. He presented an explanation of ear.h alternative. Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open. Mr. Jim Van Derhyden addressed Council and sUted that he supported the, al ternative recommended by staff. There being no one further present to speak an the matter. and there being no further, protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. ' Page V7 - Council'`Minutes - 5/7/79 The Director'of Public 'Wrjrks spoke regarding the ramifications of Alternative. No. 10. . • . •. A motion. was made :by Ybder- seconded by MacAllister to approve Alternative No. . 4h: The motion failed by the follawing vote: AYES: MacAllister, Yoder NOES: Thomas, Mandic, Bailey ABSTAIN: Pattinson fABSENT:. None A motion was made by Mandic, seconded ,by Bailey 'to approve Alternative No. 6. Following discussion, the motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Mandic NOES: Thomas, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder ABSTAIN: Pattinson ABSENT: None is A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by MacAllister, to approve Alternative #80 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey NOES: Thomas, Yoder ABSTAIN: Pattinsor, 'ABSENT: None On motion by Bailey, second Thomas, Council adopted Negative Declaration No. 79-29 ?'``� approved Precise Plan of Street Alignment 'tlo. 79-2 Alternative No. 8, and directed the City Attorney to prepa;-e an ordinance reflecting said, alignment. Motion carried unanimously, with Councilman Pattinson abstaining from the vote. PPSA 70-4 REVOCATION - ORD NO 2360 - INTRODUCED The City Clerk presen')!d a communication from the Planning Department relative to Ordinance No. 1633 which would rovoke Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 704 the alignment of ( 1 ) Atlanta Avenue from 1265' west of Beach Boulevard to Lake I Street, (2) Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway,and (3) Olive Avenue between Lake Street to 135' west of 2nd Street. On Wrch '19, 1979 a p4blic hearing was held on this matter with decision continued to con,ider in conjunction with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2. The Clerk .was directed to read Ordinance No. 2360 by title "AN ORDINANCE OF:THE CITY OF HUNTING*ron BEACH 44ENuING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH {ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING t ORDINANCE NO. 16339 AN AMENDMENT TO DISTRICT 144P 16. " On motion by Bailey, second. Mandic, Council 'approved introduction of Ordinance No. 2360 by. the following vote AYES: , Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder NOES: Tho,nas ABSTAIN: Pattinson r ' , ABSENT: None r RESOLUTION NO A 1033OLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF. THE CITY.- op HUt-1TIN( oti. BEACH 'ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO . 79--2,� ALTERNATIVE 110. 8, THE ALIGNMENT OF LAKE STREET Bt"TWEEN .0RANGE: AVENUE AND WALNUT .AVENUE AND ATLANTA A ENUE BETWEEN . DELAWARE -STREET AND LAKE STREET WHEREAS , pursuant to the .Planning and Zoning f,aw', parti- cularly California Government Code Section,65500 , the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , after notice duly given, held a public hearing on April 17 , 1979 , to align pre- cisely Lake Street between Orange Avenue And Walnut Avenue and. Atlanta Avenue beti.ween Delaware Street and Lake Street; and On May 7 , 1979 , after notice duly given, hearing was held . before this Council , and the matter having been considered, the Council finds that said Precise -P'lan 79--2 is reasonably neces- sary to the .orderly and efficient -flow of traffic , for the pre- servation of the health and safety. of the inhabitants of the city, and for the orderly development of the community, NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington 'Beach that the real property, shown on the . map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto, incorporated 'herein and by reference made a part hereof , is hereby 'designated and adopted as Precise Plan No . 79-2 of. the City of Huntington' Beach, and i ,rr.ore particularly described as follows : That' portion of Sections 11 and 14 , Township 6` South, Range: 11 West , in the Rancho Leas Bolsas , City of luntington Beach "County of Orange , State of Cali- forriia , .as shown do a map recorded in Book 51 ' Page: 13 . .of.' Miscellaneous Maps . in the 'Office, of the County Recorder ' ref said County described as follows: JO: be 12/12/79. 7 t t 1, R fAl R r i�C;4-', t.:l►, �r1�;` .'lr, t.t`ll?- Inr,(!t�a('t, toll or, t.fl�' '��lti�'+r.��-:i�,�,�;.� ;... "tit 'V t0.r _section. line oC on Id ;►nc:tIon it fin Int; a : f ` })c art iil, of .1 no,th , wit hthe . c:r!nt:crline c►f A tH t ' Averc�:�, sin .sti�wr� on, n mrip oC the Vinta Del Mar' `t'rnct recorded in honk 11 1':��;e 5 of M� ncollatleoll" MIT)) ill" 1; ;s L'hc:, orriceoC t,}:e . Caurit.y Aecorder; thence: dtic east; ; alonb, said r'ente rline .205 .25 feet to - the , true point••. �• of bcginnir:g said point being the intersection of ' the cenGerlj n"e of Atlanta Avenue , and the southerly pro- longation 'of the` east line of Alabama Street,- a '60 .00`` foot Wide street-., : as shown .on said map of Vista Del Liar Tract, said east line also being ;the west.`line of flock' 202 of said Vista Del ' Mar 'tract;` thence . along ' said line north • 79 .91 feet ; thence sout}1 8905913211 west 60 01 feet to ' a. nontangent 2urve concave to the northwest having a radius of ` 32 .00 fart; thence south-- ; westerly, 'westerly and northwesterly along said curve k through a central angle of 11200210911 , an arc distance ' of 62 .57 , feet too a point . on a compound curve concave to the northeast having a radius or 277.32 feet: , a radial to said point bears south 22°O1 ' 4111 , wes t; thence continuing along said compound curve through a central angle of 55°071 a7" ;, an are distance. of 266 .14 feet to a reverse curve concave to the southwest hav- ing a radius of 377 .32 feet; a radial bearing to said point of reverse curvature bears south 771009128" west ; ' thence n'orthwes terly along said curve. through, a central. angle .of 27 017 ' 4111 an arc d is to nce of 179 .75 feet to a reverse c ve concave to the norti east having curve � ha ir,g a radius , ' of 32.00 feet , .a radial to sa.ld point 'be:i rs north 490 5114711 east ; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 4010811,311 , an Are distance of 22 . 112 feet to a point on the east line ,of Lake Street , shown, as Railroad Avenue .. 90 feet in width,, shown on a map of' Huntington Beach, recorded in Book. 3 Page 36 of riiiscellaneour, Maps in th6 office of the county Recorder of said. County ; thence west .45 .00 feet to the .5 centerline of said Lake Street; then^e south along; said centerline 137 .50 Peet ; thence west 115 .00 feet to a point on the west line o, said Make Street, said point being the most northerly corner of Mock No. 301L as p shown on said mentioned man of Huntington Beach; thence along sold west line south378 .25 feet .to an angle point , said angle point being; intersection ., nt;ersection ',of .the southerly , extension of said west line and the northeasterly; •ex- xensioni': of, southeasterly . 11ne of D',.ock No . 201 an I shown on said map of Huntington Bea.c:h; , maid - south ac�� erly line also being ' the northwesterly line of ' Lake S tr*e , shown as First Street on said snap o1', Huntington.'Beaeh; thence South 1110.21'12". Wee L94 .34 feet along- said sauuh•= east , line 'and :`its extension* thence south 48038148" east ., R . ",i•. '1.00 .QO feet. to a point on : a nont:angent:, cu. va , concave .... - �r1.YfrC7.f.LLIti11CIIM ` OR, r nortYiwes terly having a radius of 350.00 feet; a , radlaI ' bed r.`• to .said point bears. north 48 9,9148'-' west ; . thence . y E; � . northe.nsterl • al6n said curve thriou h :a . ce' ntra.!",an le of 39019 ' 411t an are distance of 2110'. 24 'feet . to':'a- 'reverse;. curve .coricave . to the .southeast having a. `radius of 32.00 feet;` thence northeasterly alcn said reverse cur +e- E r . through a central angxp oi' S0 °3 ',09" an . arc diatend of 280*26 feet; .'thence 'north 50025 ' 9,0" east 38 .04 feet to a curve .concave to the south having a radius of -32 .00 feet ; thence northeasterly, easterly. and..southeaster.1y along x, said curve Wirough a central angle of, 8194 '15" an, are distance of 45 .56 feet to a reverse curve concave -to 'the` northeas t having a radius of 377 . 32 feet; thence south easterly and easterly along said reverse curve through a central angle of 414 °11 ' 55" . an. arc distance of 291. 07 feet; thence north 70 .00 feet to, the true point of beg'.nning. PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe City: Council of the City of Hunt- ington Req'cn at a regular meeting, thereof held on the. l7th day of December , 1979 • Mayor. ATTEST: APPROVEI) AS TO FORM: City G.1 e r k City Attor ey RI:'JIh:Wf;C, r�ND APPROVED: r.'�'IT.CATI�D AND N.I'PROVE1. City dm i n i s t ra f o r Developnvnt. Pervices Director 3 . - : . J E Y-H I B 1 T. "A " � R � a 1 ^ � — ... _ d•� LAKE STREET •fit' �� � � Q�.a� - • -VAN 00 aw •� w � r i•.l'NN .'1IJ1/ a•I111 •.NII t `� J•✓Y r' Al•YQJ •.-- 1• • J r a ` ••I•tr y' .•op ISAf ..pr i J ALABAMA --STREET" j f � L„1�.. ,, .. 1• .ua sr RIY{SiQiii RiEi�tE!!C[S' 'pplCist Pt.�a olr .tcrtwJKtvvr -- _ ' A rf•.4Nr.4 A;IE ORANGE 43rE { .._._ �••� •• ' 1 . L♦iXE JrRE,rr PR !V Q ►_ .� -�. ._ �.. CITY OF HUM TINGT6 =EACH ,. • 'tip COU!Q'I`Y Of. ORANGE: C IW OF RtW I=ON B£RCH ) , I, AL_CIA M. ,WEMORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clork 'of the City of 'Huntington' Beach, and ex-offif.io. Clerk of the ; 'City'Council of �said 'City, do hereby certify that .the whole number of members of the City' Council of the laity of Huntington beach :.-J seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and ador,ted by the axfirnative vote of more than a' majority of all the members of said City Council , at a regular meeting thereof held on the day : f of 19 by the following vote: i AYES: Councilmen: I L NOES: Councilmen: _._ ABSEMr: Councilmen: . i City Clerk and ex-offi.cio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, .California iI