Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrecise Plan of Street Alignment 79-2 - Lake St between Oran NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public htwir4 will be held by the City Council of the City of Huminpon b th. in the Council Chamber of the Chit Cantor,HuntW"on �wch.at the how of 7:30 p.m.,or ac sows thtat of er K pot:aibia,on Mcrtdey the 2nd day of Jrty, 1079,far the pu►pom of cortsiderinp Ptecia Plant of Street Alignim,tt No.79.3,a propowl to pretiady Pban take Berm between Indirwpnlit Awar+w and Yorttewn Avenue aetaNiehinIp 00 fast of light of way. A kol dewiption is on the In the PMRnin$CJopertmeM Off waa, A:1 Interarnl p mna we inrheaf to attend laid Mrin/ n►4 e■pewl(twit opinions for w s"inrt mW 14acim Pon of Stew Alignrtaar+t. Fur'lu r information navy be obt►inwf from the Office of the 0tY Cb.k.20001Main Suiiml,►1wrilMpon 0.w h.CA 926"l7141 5W5225. Dated: sr»ns CITY OF HUNTINGTON SEACH NY: ALICIA M.WWWORTH Gty Cl," Pub.mini Hunt.Mach Ind. i. t r ' l% THE. Superior Court Or ME -STATE OF CALIFOMA fn and for the Giunty of Orattite ff CIV OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK PROOF OF PUBLICATION' Fub11c :HeitrinoNo , 79-2., 74-.29. . State )(California County of Orange lbs. Rita J. Richter s. That I am and at all times herein trentioned was a citnren d the Unitto States,over the age of trr:nty-one years.and that t nm not a party io,aor Interested In the above entitled matter. taut I am tk principal clerk of the printer of the ' Huntirxatan Beach Independent Review j a newspaper of Keneriu circulation.published in the City of Huntinoton Beach + County of Orange and which new*aper is published for the dls •'' '�" i seminatlon of locid news snd intelligence of a arneral character, •.'t and which newspaper at all times herein mentiamd had and still Ms a bona fide subscription list of paying Pubscribers.and which newspaper has been established,printed and published at regular intervals In the said County*(Orange for a period esceeding one year, LW the notice,of which the anneiud Is a printed copy.has : been Imbbahed in Ilse regular and entire issue of said riew"per, - and not in any supplenst ril thereof,an the following dates,to wit Apr 11. �6 t ,197" f ./f• , t certify tar declare►under penalty of perPn-that the farego nit is true and correct. Garden Grove Dated at .. ............. .. Calif ,01 24 t h,�ay of r�Pt' 99 Signature two a"c *4tsTy 'NOTICE OIR 1►MLIC HEARIM0 PRECISE PLAN OF 9TREET ALIGNMENT 4,I0.M2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION MPS NOTICE tS HOMINY GIVEN thw a pe6k f+oa"wi*be Mid by the City Cowan of 1M Clty of HwAMMn slosh, in tM Chet+m amvbw of tM Chrh Comer,"Was"p" ftoioh,of Iles Itww of 7:30 fat-,or w me"On asto M Pope".on MaWWOI ow 7th tfoy of MW,Im.1wr:faro fw►pm W aonsw r%f A«IM Msa of fltrott A4nawu No. M2 whirl N a propwl to po odi liy aflpe Lwhw Sum Mtw*wl 0 env o AwNwo wW tal ahm Auam and Atiwft AwAw be- twtwn l7viowne•Strom aaael Lake Strom.The City Ci:m It w0l • bo ttrriayae{lq t«l t tol riiffenm t♦hww►t►wr rNaxi�by tr* alis -- wtI am will be wkWIM on.The P%mf*E r,OMW pion hew nt�svwarwd Ahorratho No.10. All tow olb►�tivw w oN alas Mn tM NtnelMN Roptwwrt. A NW a "Ipllwl b an fNo In IM Pirmtiq O+leor"ma. � Tin CNy Cowesil will atw be aw+e Worim NoWiw Dino- r tiow ft.M13 M*@"now#"with f4oaies P len of Swam AllpowwM Mo.MZ. An bltv fwnft am hw"W to ot"md said he} W4 mW 4+gres Owk ofin wm t«w spiew wW Stror Abvw4m Nb.7fi-2/NoO.tkv D+aMtrotiti Na.7S•2t). Fwthw!v0Ww r IM my be obtsintW kom t1w Office of tW C*y Clerk,2000 06;n Mrwl,Huntkarltan Owoll.CA.W". (7141 SM}832ti DOW: April 23. 19" CITY OF "UNTINOTON BI ACM hr:A L IOA M.W NTWOR TH Ctty t?arit 1"ulr.112!/Tf liwtt.farrh Ir.i. Ut 4-11-79 ever tc�erde ll"ICE 4f "MIC WMIIIG PRECISE PLAU AE c_T EET $LjjWT NO. 79-2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 79-29 NOTICE Is URIDT GUM that a public hearing will be held by the , CUY Council Of the CttY of %Mtiatton bench, in On Cecil Chabtr of the Civic Center. MuNtiQgton beach, at the hour of Z:;Q P.M. , or w soon thereafter as poesS-Ui le, oft Monday the •„_,`„.,,,,7tb dale Of _ Mw _ 19�79 , for the pux: "a of considering Precise Plan of Street Alignment' No. 79-2 which is a proposal to precisely align Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake Street. The City Council will be reviewing ten (10) different alternatives relating to this alignment and will be selecting one. The Planning Cowtssion has recommended Alternative No. 10. All ten alternatives are on file in the Planning Department. The City Council will also be considering Negative Declaration No. 79-29 in connection with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2. All ineertetod pernw* •r* Lavited to atonal eaid hsai-Aag and exp"re their opiwiam for at agnimt •aid Street Alignment Nq. 7.9-�2."ttve Declaration No. 79-29. Further infonntiou soy be obtained ftoi the 011fice elf tt"O City ( Cloesk, 20(10 Minn Street, Nuntington Beach. C.A. 91648. 714) 53E-5226 23, 1979. I W.V., OW Nam �ACb l.a IL laeeteo t'th fitly Cleft 1t •' WVICB TO CL9 TO SCREDULZ POLIC MRARING ITKM ' TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DAMPSaq FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HURM WING THE ATCA;CMD LEGAL WrICE FOR THE DAY OF 19 . ,t � t' AP'• are attached t4,ti AP's grill follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning COM1501on a� Planning Departvwnt z; Petition Appeal Other Adoption of Environdental Statue (x) YES no Refer to Planning Department • Exttnaiaa f Ark `r for additional i forwati if a al . please atrerawit exact vordt to be r uirad 'i' �_ rit h n the, lags 1`; 1 IN Tile 5uporior Court OF '"Ir STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and In:the calmly vt Arantir CITY OF HUNTINGTON DEACHr PLANNING PROOF OF PUBLICATION State of Catcfrrrua . .. .. ' ,�lalhs ��` .� •., . .. .. , . County of 0!'84e ie y, Rita J. Richter :iw Ma That f am and at all itmes herein rnentioried was a calien of the p s t)nitId Stales,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I am trot a t Aw As perty to,tar intetesled in the above entitled matter. that I am the x nt principal clerk d the prover of the WAL C Huntington Beach Ind+toendent Review rrM .'.�.�"; tr a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City rd 7A ,.Huntington .beach. .. . . ;� - Casuity of Orsnp and which ner. spar is published for the die- btab seminalion of local news and Intelligence of a general dwsoctet. w� Ire rti�M t ' and whkh newspaper at all units herein ttwWioned had and still , k- ':'I � � has a'6na fide ss octiption list of paying sobsertMn.and which tssse N iwr newwjayrtt has been established,printed and quMutsM at regular M w soot do��.�,��y IntKvils in the said County of Orange, for a period esrtilding one rwlirdf %aAMOM OWL Year. that the notice,of which the annesad is a peirded copy,fuss uew— —1 w�'i been pwblisiw d in the regular and entire loan ad add newspaper, , t y 9161 17tpf�L end not In any supplement thereO.on the following dates,to wit � , t►.�Al.I1t Apr.il .Sr 1979 �i I certify for atclare i under penalty d per)ury that the forWjtq is true and correct Dated at Garden Grove Califaenis,ms th lay of 'r .. gnature precise Plan of Street 24-163-03 24-1&4-08 AlcliMMt�. lib. 70-4 W ri A. Glean 1Mrien T. MM luir�ch 6, 1979 U4 t oun AvmA 925 10th Street Down ttunUngt m 8eecfi, C71. 92648 Huntirgton Beach, C.A. 12648 24-204-15 2.4-164-01 24-164-09 Adrian M. O'Beck lkywwd C. Jb mkvn Jr. et al Earl F. StsNem 201 Atlantic Ave" 730 14 th Strout 651 W. Phillips Blvd. tkmtirx.Ttm Deach, CA. *2648 EMtin9tan Drrech, CA. 92648 Funw a, Ch. 91766 24-204-16 24-164-02 24-164-1a F w* it. Green asawd F. am Carva1 uN 4621, .fee Faux Drlwo P.O. Bart 209 5401 S. M Awm tkuitin;tm Bench, CK. 92648 Huntingtan Bench, CA. 92648 Muttietr, Ok. 90601 i a 24-204-17 24-164-03 24`164-U f7cMLrd T. Omlar: et al Gom%p Deund an Thurla+ 0. Our OVA 227 9th Street 317 ljjkjjkjkljkjkjk 318 3rd Street MmUngton Twmch, CA. 92648 Boot 61 "untinom such, CA. 92648 24-204-L9 24-164-03 24-164-13 Horace C. Sbwall Cynthia G. Taylor at al 948 11th Street 317 Gem-go Ott 220 Via Son Pmw Ikintirngton Dwich, CA. 92648 Huntirt"m &mcb, Ch. 92648 Nwg=t Hearst, CA. 92"3 r Z4-2041 20 24-164-04 24-164-15 %lice r'. Sturaeon DOMIA M. Pnrry orm" Oft Sprci.alt.ier ?12 nalthwre kvmle 313 2nd Street Projw 42 km t i rgbon Beach,Ch. 92648 Hunt bvgtm Bettor, CA. 92648 6 36 E. Owf own Avavm Crrancp, Ch. 926" !4-204-21 24-164-05 24-165►-01 ► Akjb j#tkV*JXp jXpt0k Fttrgh G. White Atlnrtic Otll Gtawny 309 2nd Stmet. 523 W. 6th Street Raw 111.6 Hmtixv;t tt Bosch, Ch. 92648 Ina AtW�L s, Ch. 90014 4-204-21 24-164-06 24-165-07 lonm Carter Beotrice M. ftIMM at. Al Cht xI= G Ago/Joym Dwigo 16 naltim re A%mrm 305 2nd Stoat 211 give AiwiXO 1 =t3n#m Mach,, ak. 92648 Runtirgtarm Assche CA. 92648 tiurrrtington Butt, CA. 92640 1-204-23 24-164-07 024-165-O0 tiaidan H. 'tW%Lan Dwr" t4ioac le R*wt Allyn 178 Citt her'i a FVM 400 3rd Street 224 kd Stearn !tscwm j as. 91001 Mmti alt n B.rc#t, C R. 92640 HurtM.inglSm Boddie Ch. 52648 Pre Ciso PlAn of Straert 24-206-10 24-270,-14 A 1 i q mne n t W. 7 0-4 C.A. an Jr. amtit7tmn Deac al Ca q)any March 6, 1979 1737 P** Stmet Propatcty Um Division .Dawn fUntbuft e'1 Daacfi, cal. 92648 225 Bush Stmt Spin ryram-Immo CA. 94104 `24 206-02 24-206-11, 24-250-48 !fawrsrd J. Ny1ander amine Melly !-r!"m-fie Tian Suwmt .p Co, ?27 nlahamrc Avenut: 117 Alatwa Skxaet 32123 t. ndmo Cyn. R3. ►funtington Bench, C.A. Rmt•i.ngtan Douche CA. 92648 Suits 206 92648 Wbotlahe Village, CA. 91361 `24-206-01 24-2C6-12 24-260-70 Itword J. WlarOer Jbir. D. Gtylmd at al F ivt 1mt'.im Tr%wt Cb. �9631 Ch rvy Chase t7rive 837 W. 5th Street Pacif a pill Perk tftxnti.mMan DaKh, CA. 92648 Ontario, CA. 91762 80 f"*ir gtm Street fntU gton Beech, a. 92648 24-206--03 24-206-13 24-144-11 'hams L. Jaaols Mary A. Fran Lawn z. Dubm 223 PJ.atx m Stroet 1364 High Street 305 amup Avmzw 'fmtington Poach, CA. 92648 Auburn, (A. 95603 Wits A Amt IVban hmahe CA. 92648 24-206-04 24-260-04 24-144--10 Donald Fame Cbode lntrepLdo D mlgm t OD. Valan ine PwnWdan 219 Alabv m Avenue % 2p C.R. 312 Chia p Avev%me lhmtirx tm Beach, CA. 92648 P.G. 9= 540 fftin#m Bunch$ CR. 92648 `i�etla�ka,V'il.laye, Ch. 91361 ' 24-206-06 24-26D-17 24-144-12 Joseph E. Iawis Jr. Aecndal. D. Hankins attic W f 11r kolain 516 fa. loth Street 31.3 Baltimxe Av+e m 9%2 Mbcz Circle bmna►, CA. 9172n if mUngtan AeK:h,. (A. 92648 Hmt rgtm munch ca. 92646 A-206-07 24-260-26 ktvid P. Dexclani Ira M. �ni i m 24�144-13 ti ,01,1.1 Cutty Sark nrive 120 IhmWxpm Street ��s 8. [ . am 5 50 �tingtrm Beech, CA. 92646 famt�3ngt an 9"cho Ch. 92648 Realtl►' ;m am Ch ffirt�.in�:aR1 8�ch, CA. 92648 4-206-08 24-260-30 _ ! lzya 67. .*w].Ich et al Fcw*gt D. Lads 24 144 14 ! D3 AIM mtrc Street 112 Hmtingbon Stttiet 3 9�t L. l ty u �nrtbm peach, Ch. 92648 lftntinc,7f on bandit CX. 92648 90 ty11A1,C��11we ,tt San C2&mwrhr, Ch. 02472 1-20tr-09 24--260-53 24448-12 Wttltxry H. Killian Heruy T. Staynor Dwor A. tiioc� at it ,O.;,Hoot 194 C/o Gloria Jdvwm 400 3tt'1 Street rat irx n fie�+ch, CA. 92b�1 B 317 Ckert A x.�a "tinom Much, th, 9w261i E Mmtdtg6cn bwrcfi, CA. 92649 f : .wine Plan of street 24-2o3�-os 24-20 22 :nifilm t 70-4 pwi W. ox*rmll 0mraft NMFAOM Lrch 6, 1919 240 Av andla Atassacia 215 8a1timms Avwm w+n Padbrdo Beachp CA. f MWI-9toA Beech, Ch. 92648 90277 { 1-149-14 24-203-06 74--203-23 � nwo M. %alitxl tzmm C hfixi" V. DRUmm 1 l$ t111n Street 20522 Salt Air Gtrcle 15150 a1tL1x t n ee aht CA. 92648 Mwtitxl2m beach CA. 92646 MLs aLon Hilts j (A. 91345 � 1-148-16 24-203-09 23-204-01 %erd R. StaxKUi at al Charlm R. SiMpon Aabort H. Ma)vr Jr. be� L. Tahmisian John r. Plawto $36 Maimia Dr. 264 Saetic m Drive 220 Alm Strmt Corti No&,? CA. 92626 1tar3I--'a, CA. 91001 Huntington Beach,h, Ch. 92646 4- 149-19 24-203-12 - 24-704-02 rlvia mum rick Sarah 0.P. Mu t raw at al mat A. Ala at al 28 ll2 Min Street 209 Ul.tinc" Avaim *L.ingtian 8w�t, G. 92648 ucstir>�T , C31. 9264'BBeach, Ch. 92648 4,148-20 24--203-13 uWaia► S. PArnth-ayi G. MAXw► 24-204-03 1►ltztis H. Nlt].1 et al 21 qt n Beach,, (`A. 92E 6 9192 MW*lo Drive 6244 M ttibcd Stz t Mx*Jnom Mach,. CA. 9 264 6 HcaxtiMlm Haar 1-, Ch. 92648 � 4-148-21 24--203-14 24--204-04 sci.ftc South What Aoalty l aft A. Gillette .NAn A. C+LIkin at al art: F.J. XL+aixt 202 A1abmm Avenue 101 HuntLrqtm Street 109A - tit 12--2 Etmti.rWm Etch, CA. 92646 Hu Ungton Basch, Che 92648 �s Angeles, Ch. 90017 24-203-16 . 24-204-07 A ian M. ML11ar Alioe G. stuu�.�gimon 213--C Wtinore Avenue 212 Baltimcors Avail* gmtUgtm b#lr CA. 92648 Irmtrington Beach, CA. 92646 r i pt. of TrMwPortatim 24-204-13 24-204-08 10 S. Sprim Street V1la wing Mows a. LAncmtw )a Ampeleso CA. 9 052 Oersi 8 110 Alm AvwA* 206 wtinwe AVmm � RawtIngbrin Beach# G. 92648 ttuntb*w Wwide O1. 92649 1-206-02 24-404-14 24-204-L2 mim J. Rylardw 1lrlleai U Nble n Mnr'ian I/j11ia's !7 Alabwm Avemn 106 Alm afiAW%A ISO wil sm Wive ntirgbm tlemche CA. 92648 Matirqbon gam, CR. 92648 IMbehan, PA 18201 i 3 , 2+�=L62»2� ^ 24465r-M Charles 4Anian ffluuwrll a. t4wkid►rMr 201 Ickes Street Apt. 8 I&M RenUzgbon feeds;; CA. 92648 xm4xxrtdolt, Cif. 92660 i .24-•163-01 24-165-17 , Nu*ixj i4lvriby Dw4d r„ Aaecu eon at al P.O. •'Arse 140 owtva Rlchoitle IkxnUn#w Aeiseh, CCU. 92648 211 2nd Stnwtt fkmtirqtm 1, CA. 92646 24-61--13 24•-204-18 � Anbert G. Pol led at ul 1Mwvin Shumate at al raraldine "Wtod 219 1laItIu atm Avom 25241. hVz, 2q Street H►astirgCoa owho 0, ON. ;i''b48 L xml Hi]1e. C2t. 92653 24--162-02 24-260-23 fiarold E. Tookins Gi1Lwt HWtUM Jr. 231 Lake Stzeet 110 Hmtington 5trpt I tntimrton beach, CA. 92648 amp Arech. G. 92648 24-260-12 24-NO-24 Cauia playa Gene" Tow"k at al 1096 14. Main.St. &dbe D 17701 ft iq0thgood Year Orange, CA. 92667 H►Mti vtM Hattl�h, Ch. 92649 s PE t 24--260-28 , d10 lain Street 0eel Los ACh. 90014 909hyS..wBrd�tBlvd. l ' Nt BaL oa, CA. 92661 24-162-25 24-260-36 Harbara J. Firey at al Bucw--d J. ftc it 4924 Ptarlbaroug : 4Wy 10819 Myx ct. Carnddetal, ('a. 95608 P wntaein VWIWY1 ; (7l. 92103 j i j 24-463-02 2S-250-54 7tilm ►tylw i tLt M i a DAUW I hoc. 270ONir Iow !load - 9th Slut , oboU'tea, CR. 92627 S a tmiar, CR. 90401 24-16503. 24-1.62-01 j ►%lia ium at al 110e M bakro/tIsi• N. Smith : 13 2 9luret 23S71 R1 Oarrtto fBrR1l, C8L« 9 48 'L i gwio M i l k G1 92653 tXmise Plan of street 24-161-11 2�-162M13 ►lirps, t No. 70-4 � L man br h 6, 1979 205 tyke Most Ulsm C. w l own HraRtixaytm Boacch, CA. 92648 �� street che Ch. 91648 �24-165--10 24- 161•-I2 74-6k jk jk onevieve T*x3A Gem" Cmundt an 14 3rd Suet 317 2nd Start uuntt xlton Peach, CA. 92648 8mtisgtcn Boo-cY, Ch. 92648 24-165-12 24-•161-14 24-162-26 NE IKX20 RY et, al Alfred J. R-11adino Jr. Chralyn S. Awaedia .o. Aooc 4086 10 E. H%ntir:rtan Drive 222 2rd Stnot ants Ana, CA. 92702 Axr,*&&, Cal. 91006 PIO. sm 167 Basch, CA, 92648 24-165-13 24-162-01 24-•16247 ward mawn Mile M. Btlkn�/1'.laie M. Smith Hatay B. zkw at Al 25 12*.h Street 23571 31 Oomtit o 540I. S. !►VWM untd.rx#m , CA. 92649 Logmu IdLls, CA. 92653 W ALttar, a. 90601 24-165-•15 24--162-04 24-162-19 1.th Ftumles/Iadse Day John A. G%lkLn slsT SWflald at ad. )96 F. street 101 Hmtivgtan street 320 Joliet Avmm in Bernardino, CA. 92405 8mch, CA. 92648 Amtkqtm bm*, CZ. 92648 1-160-02 24--162-05 24-I62-20 m A. Trainer Etta iamb at al Janet J. FadAn 10 orange Avenm 18752 Gregocy tam 43846 N. War otirgton Beech, CA. 92648 Nu Ungton , CA. 92646 iarlt inter, Ch. 5W34 •- s •-160-03 24-162-08 24--162•-21 c c o►le,Axhe le lama J. Framw Paul E. Pater 0 3rd Strwt 11051 'Ira* 14325 E. FXGmr Wivo ntixxjtm Mach, Ch. 926413 Gardw C1 xm o CA. 92640 1Att ier, Ch. 90603 -161--01 24--162-02 24-162-22 to 14. ftil a dine Otinis M. tin leuvjn C=lYn S• Ads 3 s. Mariposa Ant. 24 A= 236 P.O. Sm 167 Aylel"J ak. gM20 lkyn Mwr,, CA. 92318 222 2nd Stow macho CA. 9264i •161-•Ob 24-152-12 24-162-23 ;U Arm Jewett LAMA Yl 00 Li,=lctx rq at al John Parnoldan ! 2r�d':9tt'eet 112 19irh 8ts�rt 205 XAM Struft rttrgWn Moth, CR. 92"P mmtitrc tin H�Mecfi, Cal. 9 48 mminom Beath. Cal. ta" j 161-07 . 24-162-24 ter Dmrt voliim l:�nytan dealt , CJ19Z648 H tin tistq !lead,G9 264 8,,, � qt=n ' REQUEST FOR CITY Cam,. WIL �cnoN Submittedlny James W. Palin Department _DD"eJ_9S:me1]t SeryiS:,2g, . �■i■ w■Y�.i Date Prepared , ,;; � 30j -_ , 1j,79 Backup Material Attached Yes p No Subject PREP ..RLM -OF- 5T EET 01=41 NQ- 79-.2 PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF ATLANTA AVENUE BETli"EN DELAWARE STREET' AN .. LAKE STREET AND LAKE STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE 4a1Z W&LMT- w Y■/■wlw�■■Yww■� ■� City Administrator's Comments wiwww■wc Approve as recommended Statement of Issue, Recommendation. Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: �... +■siw.Ra.�■r,wwn.a.....aw.w.��■r•w�■n..www..wr..r.� . .c. ....r■w....■���w.:ar. a�--.�.�■�..:■.r.r.wr.a..r..r.■ S1't1TEMENT 0 F ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is Precise flan of Street Alignment No. 79-2, which is the alignment of. Atlanta Avenue, between Delaware Stre,at and Lake .Street and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut: avenue . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission is reconunending that the City Council approve Precise plan of Street Alignment No. 79- 2 , Alternative 10 and direct the City Attorney' s Oftice to prepare an ordinance reflecting said alignment . ANALYSIS: Applicant : Initiates! by City Council Location : IrcarsecLion of Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue Request : Establish the alignment of Atlanta Avenue, be�-.ween Delaware Street and Lake Street and I,al:e Street between Orange Avenue send Walnut Avenue and their intersection. PWNING CON3rII$SION -ACTION 011 1`' ,RIL_ 17, 197y: oN NOTXON BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY PANNE, THE COiMMISSION RECOMMENDED PRECISE PLAN OF STREET WjIGNMENT NO. 79-2 TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION WITH ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT NO. 10 BEING THE REC(ftMNDED nON- FIGURATI ON IN CONCEPT ONLY BY THE FOLIAIf m VOTE: AYES: Higgins, Russell, Finley, Cohen, Paone NOES: None )001 :ee : BSZNT: Stern., Bazil -PPSA 79-2 Page Two Additional action taken at that meeting was the adoption of Resolution 1246; ON MOTION BY PAONE AND SECOND BY PAONE, RESOLUTION NO. 1246 An AMENDFD TO REFLECT ALTERNATIVE NO. 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN- MENT WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Higgins , Russell , Finely, Cohen, Paone NOES : None ABSENT: Stern, 'Baxil DISCUSSION: In 1970, the City Council adopted Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. '70--4 , which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake Street and Lake Street, between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue. Thip alignment as adopted, has never been constructed and after numerous discussions , the City Council has recommended that this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a naw precise plan be established for this alignment . At the March 19. 1979 City Council meeting. the Counci 'L directed the Planning Commission to review alternative alignment designs and report back to the council with its recam.-Tiendation for a new precise plan for this intersection. On April 17, 1979 , the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 79•-2. At this meeting, :he Commission reviewed ten alternatives and a variation of one of those. alternatives. The ten alternatives reviewed were the same as those presented to the Planninq Commission as part of Precise Ilan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 . After reviewing all eleven of the alternatives , the Planning Commission selected Alter- native Nv� . 10 to be presented to the City Council as the conceptual design for. the Lake Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment . Attached are both the staff reports from Precise: Plan of Street Alignment No. 78 -4 dated August 1 , 1978 , and from precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 dated April 17 , 1979. They original ten alternatives are discussed in detail in Precise Elan of Street Alignment No. 79-4 . while Alternative 4A is discussed in Precise Plan of Street Align- ment No. 79--2 . ENVI80NMENT&L STATUS: Precise Plan of Street Alignn&rt No. 79-2 was assessed ; for environmental effects under Negative Declaration No. 79-29. This negative declara tion addressed all ten of the proposed alternatives. Negative Declara- tion No. 79-29 was posted for the prescribed length of time in the Office of the City Clerk and the Huntington Beach Independent. No_ , comments were received by the Planning Department, either in writing or oral . during or after the posting period. ,i PPSA 79. 2 Page Three ON MOTION BY C+OHEN AND SECOND BY HIGGINS NEGATIVE DECLAitATION NO. 79-29 WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: Higgins, Russell, Finley, Cohen, Paone NOESs None ABSENT: Stern, Daail MNDING gou8CE: Not, applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Council may consider any of the other alternatives that were. submitted to the Planning Commission on ,April 17 , 1979. Ench of the eleven alternatives are part of the attached staff reports and each has been analyzed for both advantages and disadvantages . SURPQ tTINC :NFORMATIQ!'i : 1 . Area Map 2. Planning Commission Staff Reports dated A►,gust 1 , 1978, .April 17 , 1979 3. Negative Declaration No. 79- 29 Respectfully submitted, aJ mW. Pal.in Acting Secretary JWP:SMB:gc oil r- (sCc,z ys '` �'. _' � / ' '• 1 ��Rtj., y111/i'j 'f ..- 1_r�_ .Jt .� 1� \�l ,.♦~� if ^ � �j♦.i• 1j �,r111� u '`^ s �� u.i tl1 �_� tj M 10 /♦��'"�(t' �`!f+' �1.`�r ;{...re�sr`f 1'� • `�,�.` •.. ..1t.f11N ...�. (�1 / " r !• j +` �1 1 t';. { f1j PROJECT <.� C3 1 l N�•� ( S2.PD 1 I Opp tlunti n beach ach lane' p �ng 'departrrieht v. F J i �4�`� ?� R � r ��, ,jam,• ; � `�� �' i r,,..v mow~, • � t • ' _~'_-.-`� "• 1 '-----_.._��e-+ .-__.'_ _ l t _ i. f � 7 �• ---- 10i l ` RlYf310UlS REiERENCES "' c-_ a.vcc�ic a.c.v.:��rr � . --+- - -- --- _� ..__.� �. ,.�._.. eq. 'NwM'�l�Fr CASE:r.'►'�JI!f "L7"ifA�i'iilE�� CITY OF HUNTING70N =EAC?i EXSTM WM PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGN-1ENT 78-4 ATLAKTA/LAKE J t. v OltA frt�,�8 lot/ /f ~�►� If lop '.1 1 t ; 4 � M ( 1 t 0 I r , • be* low !11P§r1L_ TOt Planning Commission FROM: Development Services-Planning DATE: April 17 , 1979 PRECISE PLAN OF STRI:L'I' ALIGNMENT NO. 7972/NEGATIVE DECLA TIATION NO. 79-29 APPLICANT: Initiated by Development Serv. DATE ACCENTED: N/A LOCATION: t..eke Street between Orange MANDATORY PROCESSI►'IG DAr! E and Walnut Avenues; and Atlanta Avenue between N/A Delaware and Lake Streets . GENE:IML PLAN: N/A ItEQIJEST Review of alternative align- ments to precisely plan ZONI NG : N/A Lake Street and Atlanta Ave . as described above, EXISTING USE : 'N/A ACIMAGC: N/A 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 79-29 and adopt the attached resolution recommend- ing that the City Council adopt Alternative 4A as the precise plan of street alignment: for connection of Atlanta Avenue with Lake Street 2 . 0 GE14ERAL INFORMATION : In 1970 the City Council adopted Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 70-4 , which is the alignment, of Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and Lake Street and Lake Street +aetween Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue . This alignment as adopted has never been constructed ' and after numerous discussions the City Council has recommended that this precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a new precise plan be established for this alignment . At the March 19 , 1979 City Council meeting , the Council directed the Planning Cost ission to review alternative alignment designs and report back to, the Council with a recommendation for a new precise plan for this intersection. Attached is the staff report from Precise plan of Street Alignments No. 78-4 which was presented to the Planning Commission on August 1, 1978 . This report provides ten alternatives for they now P.P'. S.A. 79 2 April 17, 1979 Page 2 alignment of Atlanta/Lake and reviews each of the alternatives and 4' 1 provides fiscal impacts on each of the ten alignments . AJ,so attached is one additional alternative which has been labeled z Alternative 4A and is similar in nature to Alternative 4 as pre- sented in Precise Plan of Street Alignments 78-4. 3.0 ANALYSIS: Each of the ten alternatives are analyzed , including costs relating to relocation , construction, and land acquisition, in the attached staff report . Only Alternative 4A .is analyzed herein. Alternative 4A provides for a continuation of the existing alignment and with the use of a 20--foot offset of the centerline to the south of the existing centerline at a point approximately 140 feet east of Huntington Street this alignment would maintain 100-foot right--of-way from Beach to Lake Street. This offsetting of the centerline as proposed would eliminate any disruption of the property on the north side of Atlanta Avenue. Minimal disruption would take place at the intersection, which helps to maintain a lower estimated development cost for this alternative than the majority of the ten alternatives explored under P .P.S.A. 78-4 .. Coat Summery Right-of-Way Alternative Acc?uisitiors P,210cation Lake Street Construction 7btal Cost 4A $424,000 $234,Un0 0 $440,000 $10098,000 It should be noted that the figures used to compute the total cost for this alternative are the same as those used to compute the figures on the other ten alternatives, except that the construction of the intersection has been based on 1979 construction costs. The cost estimates for the ten alternatives in the attached staff reports were figured on 1977 dollars . This alternative would lessen the relocation of residents on the north side of Atlanta and minimize the impact on the property at the northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama. The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Commission may have on this alternative or any of the alternatives presented under P. P.S.A. 78-4• 4 .0 RECOMMENDATION : The staff is recommending that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 1246; recommending to the City Council that Alternative 4A be the precise plan of street alignment for the Lake Street/Atlents Avenue intersection . P'*P.S IA. 79-2 April 17, 1979 Page 3 1►TTACHMENTS: ' 1 . Alternative 4A 2 . Negative Declaration No. 79-29 3 . Staff Report for Precise Plan of Street .'alignment No. 78-4 dated}August 1 , 1978 4 . Resolution of Intent 1246 SMn:df I rl . �r.•-/ 1 1. I !1 �•A I-- r Ug ND . - EXIST CURB EXIST RIGHTS OF WAY PROPOSED STRIFE i PHOPOSEI) DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE LEFT OR RIGHT TURN ONLY LADE ' -- 'PROPOSED Ct1R8. PROPOSED I21017S of WAY ACUIS,IYION SCALE + I"= Iao' 11V' ft.k Ww t �i � � AtrAQAt.tA 51 *••`�,�-, � � ' ;��.._ _ � t: <�"�-. , ,- , •ate-.� �.�...,,�_.�► rr�.�---1�.j _ 1�. ._. •--. . ._.,.- M � .. 00 • `/` `r Iw •. 1 IJj � • �� '' ALINEMENT STUDY PLA14 q' LANTA AVENUE AT LAKE STREET if fole f� S.Y. ? -Z9- 11M i - �1AL b . 51porL. TO: Planning Commission I FROM: Planning Department DATE: August 1 , 1978 RE: PROPOSED ALTERNAT,*,VES FOR PRECISE PLAN OF STREET AY,IGNMENT NO. 7 8-,1 (ATLAN:A/LAKE) ► 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission : r i 1. Select Alternative 3 or 9 as the preferred alignment. 2 . Dir,:ict staff to set Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 for public hearing at the September b, 1978 meeting . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFOI714ATION: On July 5 , 1978 , the Planning Commission adopted Resolution of Intention No. 1225 initiating proceedings to revoke Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70-4 and to adopt a new precise plan for the inter- section of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street. This report presents a summary of all ten (10) alternatives that hava been considered by the Planning Commission to date. Included in the report i.s a drawing of each alternative , a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative , and the associated estimated cost to implement each alternative. 3. 0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES : The primary areas of concern with regard to these Precise Plan alternatives are as follows: (1 ) The impact of the alternatives on local circulation patterns. In particular, the impact on east/west circulation and downtown/ beach access . (2) The cost of implementating the alternative , including right-of-way acquisition, relocation , and construction. (3) Engineering feasibility of the alternatives , including safety considerations . PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. i '4 . 0 ANALYSIS : Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 70-4 was adopted in February , 1971 , and was intended to provide a direct east/west connection between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street utilizing Atlanta Avenue and a one-way couplet composed of Orange Avenue and Olive Avenue. Although the goal of improving east/west circulation in the downtown area has been retained, the concept of the one-way couplet, which was an integral ` part of the Top -of-the-Fier Plan , has been deleted from the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . As a result , PPSA 70-4 no longer r,efiects the City ' s circulation plans and objectives . 0 In 1977 , the Planning Staff develo• wl five alternatives for a new precise plan for Atlanta and Lake. All fix-:! ,alignments called for a 100 foot width on Atlanta (presently 60 fend- wide ) with the additional right-of--way coming off the south aide. V z,ef: of the alternativen pro- vided a direct connection bt. ,ween Atlanta and Orange, accomplished by curving Atlanta northward between Huntington Street and Lake . alternative 4 corresponded essentially to the existing configuration , with Atlanta intersecting Lake at right angles . Alternative 5 proposed to terminate at Atlanta , which was to curve southward to .intersect with Pacific Coast Highway utilizing the existing Lake Street right-of-way. At its June 22 study session, the Planning Commission dire::ted staff to prepare additional alternatives based on the following criteria : (1 ) the Atlanta Avenue right-of-way should be 80 feet wide; (2 ) a direct connection should be provided between Atlanta and Orange ; (3 ) impacts on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta should be minimized. Four new alter::,,,_-ives (Alternatives 6 , 7 , S and 9) were developed by staff and preson,.:ed to the Planning Commission at the July 18th meeting . These alignments involve significant design problems due to undesirable curve radii and sight distances . An alignment that provided an adequate radius would necessarily have a greater impact on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta , since the curve would begin at a point closer to Huntington Street . Therefore, choosing among these alternatives involves a tradeoff between design safety/traffic Flow considerat-ions and, the cost of right-of-way vcquisit.ion and relocation . The following dis :ussion presents a summary of each of the ten alternative alignments that have been previously considered by the: Planning Commission. 4 . 1 Alternative I Alternative 1 would provide a 100 foot wide rights-of-way and would be realigned north to intersect with Orange Avenue at Lake Street . The 100 foot wide right-of-way would be maintained to 3rd Street at which kw,f r QkEC1SL* PLAN OF STREET ALIGWENT NO. 78-4 Page 3 point the right-of-way would continue at its present width of 75 feet. : The alignment would require purchase of property and relocation of " persons .living in housing structures lying within the proposed right-of-way . Alternative 1 would also entail the cul-de- sac' i.ng of a three local stCDet3 . Alabama Street would be cul-de-sated where it . intersects with Atlanta Avenue . 2nd Street and olive Street would be cul-de•-sated at Lake Street. 4 .1. 1 Alternative 1 Advantages 1. Provides an east/west connection between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest• Street. 2. Provides a parallel streets to pacific Coast highway that will relieve traffic congestion along Pacific Coast highway. 4 . 1 . 2 Alternative 1 Disadvantages 1. Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 2 Alternativ—. 2 provides for Atlanta Avenue to be designed at a 100 foot right-of-way and swing north to intersect with existing Orange Avenue at bake Street. This alignment does not require the purchase of land west of Luke Street as is the case under Alternative 1 . However, the Alternative 2 alignment would require the acquisition of more land east of Lake Street. 4 . 2. 1 Alternative 2 Advantages 1. Provides a direct east/west connection between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street . 2 . Would not require acquisition of properties west of Lake Street . 3 . hrovides a parallel street to Pacific Coast Highway . 4 . 2 . 2 Alternative 2 Disadvantages 1 . Cost may be prohibitive . 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 3 Alternative Alternative 3 - partially recognizes the financial and social contS that are characteristic of Alternatives 1 and 2, by providing for fewer winces to be relocated. Alternative 3 provides for a ,100 fnok residences ., right of way urging the existing curb Tine on the north aide of' Atlanta Avenue as the north boundary of the Atlanta Avenue Street section extending from Beach Boulevard to intersect Lake Street half way betwoon Orange' Avenue and Olive Street. PRECISI3'PLAN OF STRE ' ' ALIGNKENT NO . 7R-4 Page Alternative 31 while it- does not provide for a direct connection between 4 Atlanta Avenue and Orange Avenue , can be designed .t:o !hermit: a smooth flow of traffic between the two streets through the establishment,,of a signalization program. Proper signal phasing between Orange and Atlanta would accomplish the goal of providing for improved east/west traffic Clow be';ween Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest. Alternative 3 would require the cul-de-sacing of Olive Avenue and 2nd Street. 4. 3. 1 Alternative 3 Advantages 1. While total cost continues to be high, a reduction in acquisition , relocation and construction costs over Alternatives 1 and 2 are realized. 2 . Relocation of residences would be lessened . 3 . The goal of developing improved east/west traffic flow between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized . 4 . Minimizes impact on property on ncrthwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama 4. 3. 2 Alternative 3 Disadvantages 1. Potential for traffic delays 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential. units . 4 . 4 Alternative 4 Alternative 4 provides for continuation of the existing alignment and taking an additional 40 feet from the property on the south side of Atlanta Avenue, thus providing a 100 foot right--of- way. A signalization program as discussed under Alternative 3 would be established. Olive Avenue and 2nd Street would be cu,L-de-sacred under Alternative 4 . 4 ,4 . 1 Alternative 4 Advantages 1. While total cost continues to be high , a reduction in acquisition, relocation and construction costs over Alternatives 1 and 2 are, realized . 2. Relocation of residences would be lessened. 3. The goal of developing improved east/west traffic flow between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized. - 4 . Minimizes impacts on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 7 8-4 PlAg r 5 4 . 4 2 Alternative 4 Disadvantages 1. 'Potential for traffic delays �2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units. 4 . 5 Alternative 5 Alternative 5 is different in concept to the first four a]ternativeof in that it does not provide: for the direct Atlzinta/Orange link . Atlanta is proposed to swing southward to Pacific Coast Highway, utilizing the exisIting Lake Street right-of-way. Lake would curve eastward and terminate in a "T" intersection at Atlanta . As a _result, this alternative would deemphasize take Street. as a primary arterial and favor Atlanta Avenue . Hea.eh traffic would tend to utilise Atlanta as an access route to and froirr Beach Boulevard. This confi.ouration would do very little to improve east/west. circulation or downtown access. Alternative 5 is the least expensive of the proposed alignments ,, since it impacts vacant land . It also provides for increased traffic safety, since the configuration would involve fewer vehicular con- flicts than the others . The alternative would require the construction of a cul-de-sac on Olive A,,,enue. 4 . 5 . 1 Alternative 5 Advantages 1. Least costly alternative: . 2. Superior design features and intersecr.4on configuration . 3. Minimiwes impact on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . Provides slightly improved Beach access in the event Lake is not extended north . 4 . 5. 2 Alternative 5 Disadvantages . 1 . Dees not improve east/west: circulation or improve downtown ,access. 2 Interrupts Lake Street traffic . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . t. 46 `Alternative 6 Thfiss 41ternatfve pcovidat for an eighty foot alignment on Atlanta, curviliq ;northward, st citing at, a point about 340 feet Kest, of the for. a desi n o euntingt:ori Street. �'he' radius of this eurvi., -pia _4©0 'feet cent el. . 1ine of t. g p ,ed of 35 mph . The int,iers3ection 'of. Atlanta and Lakes .` would `involve; a triangular drran'gement to accommodate turning , awe*. ."nts : Because ;of :ght distance problensa and undenisrable Inter aoct:io.n configuratirins, cs l-de--Macs Ion. 2nd Street and hl.abaVA Strdst &-ro' roposad as ''part of this precise Plan. mIBL* PLAIN- 01P- -ST ALIGNMENT NO. ' 78-4 6 • A1:ir fatie oneast corn er acquisition of ot&a detached: dw l ng, o the northeast h, n he n f : At 1ant and nd Alabama and: sixteen mobile hmes on the south side ,of Atltinta east of Huntington Street. ; The r"ainder of the right-of-way needed in currently vacant'. A p6ition of. the existing Atlanta right-of�-way would be declared surplus and sold to partially offset the acquisition cost . 4: 6. 1 Alternative 6 Advantages . 1. Better design (curve radii, sight distances ) than Alternative 7 and I . '; 2. Establishes Atlanta/Orange connection to improve dovrntown access, east-west circulation. 4. 6 . 2 Alternative 6 Disadvantages 1. cost ray be prohibitive . 2. Innvolves relocation of residences. 3 . Design is less desirable than Alternatives 9 and 10 . 4 . 1 Alternative 7 Alternative 7 is similar to # 6 in concept , but is designed to avoid completely the developed properties north of Atlanta . In order to accomplish this, the needed curve radius is approximately 325 feet. This alternative also shifts Orange Avenue slightly to the south and requires the acquisition of one unit on the southwest corner of Orange and Lake. As with Alternative 6 . cul•-de-sacs are prugoeQd on end Street and Alabama Street . 4 .7.1 Alternative 7 Advantages • 1. Cost may be prohibitive. 2. Minimizes impact on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . 7 . 2 Alternative 7 Disadvantages 1. Very poor design features (curve radii, sight d,-Stances) . 2. Poor intersection design at Lake Street- . 3 . Costlier than Alternatives g and 10. 4 . Involves elocation of residences . 4 . 0 Alternative 8 nt is. the most radical- design pro sped rovidin for a This aligrwe Po p +� curve radius of 300 feet and 'g peed of, about 30 mph. , It therefore represents a trade off in favor of low,, cost at .Cha' t�ip�tnee of safety: and siaooth, traffic flow. Cu1Mde-�tacs;:would'' be constructed, on 2nd Street and Alabama. tRECZSX P?AN OF STREET 1 LMMMENT NO. 78-4 Page 7 4.8.1 Alternative 8 Advantages r . 19 Accomplishes Atlanta--Orange connection. 4 .0. 2 Alternative 8 Disadvantages �r 1. Highly.. `undesirable curve radii, sight distances, and intersection configuration . Could pose significant safety problem. 2. Involves relocation of residences . 4 . 9 Alternative 9 Alternative 9 is a much more moderate design than the previous threes, providing for a curve radius of 800 feet. This necessitates beginntnq the rurvalCure at a point about 150 feet west of the center line of <' Huntington Street, resulting in severe impacts on developed property, north of Atlanta. It is estimated that at least twenty--one units would be affected and require relocation . As a result , this alignment is the most expensive of the ten alternatives . 4 .9 . 1 Alternative 9 Advantages 1. Accomplishes Atlanta/Orange connection . 2 . Design Features are superior. This in the best alternative from a traffic flow/circulation point of view. 4 . 9 . 2 Alternative 9 Disadvantages 1 . Costliest of all alternatives . 2 . Involves substantial relocation . 4 . 10 Alternative 10 Alternative 10 provides for exactly the same dc-aign as is shown in Alternative 5 , with the exception that the right-of-way width west of Huntington Street is HBO feet . The same advantages and disadvantages teat were indicated under Alternative 5 apply to Alternative 10. Alternative 10 overall cost may be the least of all alternatives, _ j including Alternative 5 since right--of-way acqui¢ itxon -end construction _ cost would be reduced by the difference between a 100 feet right-of-way and an 80 foot right-of-way . F-: PRI CISR PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 Page e 4 11 Coat Summary Ri `fit of Wtt Relocation Lake St. Conatxu ' Alternative g M - y ction Total '4 Acquirsi tion Existing L 700 , 000 286,000 340,000 370,000 2,696 t 1 740 , 000 256,000 343,000 220,000 1, 5560 2 830 , 000 266, 000 340f000 220, 000 106560'0 3 500, 000 240, 060 340,000 206 , 000 1 , 286,0 4 5060000 240,000 340, 000 210, 000 11290,D 5 591 ,000 240, 000 0 230, 000 1 ,061,0i 6 7050000 255, 060 340 , 000 1800000 1 ,480,01 7 675, 000 255e000 340, 000 2000000 1 ,470,©I 8 6001000 2551000 340 *000 180,000 1 ,375 ,0i 9 675, 000 298 , 000 343 ,000 180, 000 1 , 693 , Q'L 10 591, 000 2400000 0 230, 000 11, 06100C jp 1 / L Y �tEYlSIOt►S` AEf[11I MCI s �. �s..na AMWtCAPS A&.46• MW^0'r oe,,*,pgo-.+it r&� L� ~ M......rr�..r�.�+.-��....r+.�+..�+.•+..�.�+. ��� -�-.._ ��. Yam, • M.'�.��� ^�-�S.Z�-.ter+.,-.._.a�'��•��r'�� city of ovM�iw�TON MACH a& .. PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGN't£NT 78-4 ATLANTA/LAK£ t �1 - ,1► �/ , i:% fir^�,` ��� , r't �y Jr.� 111 ' I IAwi i f n •1 1 t 1 .vv_•v rra0 ro w iwrrr e p Ins . .. l � .y ell f yo r, _ OV �� •� . -- --_ • ir�stirw aytwr t RiY1S1QNi Y 1tffint"cis _ AUERNARVE 2 - _.r.�- `�.�-.�.'�•.�..... a I:stir 7. i - I rlwrYl � r?.V •v r , r i r .. . rr • , � tr�cs� �• � f �*p 5 A Wit lOslri+Ll/N 1 dp M _..._. ._. _ y. ._.-�... VA •f w r� ; � r frrffr ib j t s , } i r i t , ri.wl�r 1 � u t roar ear o rrJ j art s de 416 < s tit . �r •� \ ' 1 �v�`tom. f,�' .�'�, ,/ �� f/ / •1o.~i� /�* •,`,,i• � ���, '`� )+ _ r 1 �1 \ NO N 161 10 f r• , r ' to 14t 00, Lie WON � CO j rl i• :r , I •1vTNI'� •� � L� c , �i f x ; it 1 rPV d 74 l L.' t :::._.�: .�.�.._......�.. it(�� It � � - I ri. � ` ��� �f' ���` • r itIf �I-I t, r r tt ''`���i;i '�1�° j {;� fir',. , ail t' '�....�.✓' (' ;ltC/.r „ T�f� ll� �/� - rw�l�ri4 + , � � +,J it;....,.� r :•;' _'.•; ,_ "�.....ItiI � .-.'.• +• �� 'I. ;'f�;�1 ,, ��' 'f, (.'.:r.,'i ��1'.('. .. ... 14.•S .lJ�`: .:�Ik. r:, •1 • .... :�i ',1�. r�, / rP I.1! 1! <r+ r1 +.1� r ,'r s.� {(((} 11 r rJ/y/( -•� � � ��..�� 1' } 1St ,Y 4,;t. �+J+l • I w 72 wAL r f � t Fn w.w�.arS:.ii1�.=- ram, !► h.A.•4-C R &.A.r r. �� `d I j �`�~ � r�h�•\ 1 ` ;, f4 ! � t' I ' f , W ;. ski r "r1 ! lb rt��'I'�Ir' PA;IW67 it I wwr�.r4gM ► 4- ILPII 10 yr• r •',fir � - - !� PRECISE PLAN CIF STREETl ALIGNMENT 77- 3. A L T E-R N'- ATL ANTA,/ CAKE. Now= cadix ATICIN. pLAN.'�, ART"E 'RA L . STREETS AND , Hi6kWiYt fowl W totar s _,Cower WTV., "a Las soot am"= ■w n.t �� � MRi�MiN Ktssws woR M s� 000 U Ml1 WWAIR ss[sl HRM M am"vawtw" '1 ` _&VOW" / CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH awoe toukrr CALWOtMiA h. : OF ­R# t1 To.n,.,.,. B. f DEPARTMENT. +DF PtANNMyG /1Nd' ENV1R(* r: . NIENY/1l RES�Uit ` F. 0, BOX 190, WNTINGTOW 01ACN, CAI.If MMIA 0264 IT1416x"II Savoy M, eellavia, Setiior' Planner FROM: Environantal Resources section DATL :' April 13 , 1979 SUBJECT: NEGATIVE OECLARATIUN No. 79-29 (PPSA 79-2) ' ' APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach ,y REQUEST: A preef se alignment of Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue . f, Bac--kgxo'"d Based -on :the Staffs initial, study of t h`ie project a T n ative 1; ", atiire 'Declaration wa8 published in the local, newsNape�r and posted fn�the"0ffice of the' City Cleric for a 10-•day p6bl.ic review"perfod endir:g+ April '16, 1979 and as of April 13 , 1979 , - no comments were' received. Any; .cornments received subsequent to this date will be. transmitted to the Plenning"Commission for their review. i'• , + �onmental . Resources Section recommends that the Planning ;Commission The Envir �,ra sect •ro 'eCt grill not have a si `ltion .No. 79�29 Eindint� that the ty pprove Negative ©eclar p po project significant Averseleffect on the environment. - Respectfully subtaitted, mi6s R , Barnes Assistant Pla,nner JRB/s t ENVIRO MENTAL ` 1WORMMON FARM Fee 75.0 0 FOIi CITY M 'ONLY Da to* City 'of J1untingtot: `tjeach, PlanmLng DepaKt�nt Rereived: Applicant ut or ze Agent projiat 11 umber i P'0. Aax Mill ftuntir gton Deach, ' CJ1. 92648 ; Department of Origin ' mailing 133ress hlarnin r Oth-ee,.-Application Telephone ` or P*rmi t Numbers 's See aiivrship list on -file in the PPSA 79-2 Planning Department -} roperty Owner Mailing A resg Te ep one NOTE: To assist ,the Department of Planningand-, Environmental Resources in mak iefrmination as to whether a mental , fect me signizicart envfron-;w` ,; e f e, do fey result from the proposed project', ' the' ;following,, infoination ' must be supplied , flaps referred - to below maybe, ` Viewed at the; City, of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources . 1 :0 Proect Info nation (Please attach Plot Plan and submit photo- graphs , of subject property) i + 7 1. 1 Ua ture-''of Pro ject: Give complete description of the proposed t, project. A precise aligrmnt of ix-Oce Street between Orange AVE,nue and 411;Ut-Avenue and Atlanta between Delawnre Street aW Ukke Street. Mn (10) df'kferent alternatives will be a xisidered by the Planning Wm scion. (See at:tAched) a . Ifr-theJ project is co=ercial .o . p r industrial give.;a,. coir►pl4`te .; deaari:pti.on of activ, tins and .other pertinent information including but not limited to `whet?icr it in neighUorhood city ,or regionally oriented, square footage- of sales; areas (if any) , estimated employment per shift , any potentially . hazardous materials which may be used, etc. If,, klie praject� is re '3dnntial, indicake nwaibor, types i 'aid sfse of units and 'an soriatatd feCili Cie a: r .A • ! i; c': 11 ,.� tha...pro je'ct •"ia inetitutiona�l, indicata the ma joro fu If ncii6n, estimated employment per. shift � a►nd c�omunity benefits to , be derived from the project. N/A d . Liat all ' r ,,. types of building materials to be `used .fdt ,all structures iii the project. (Submit detailed elevations If available) N/A 4 1.2 Location of project: (Address, nearest street intersections) Intersection of: Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street and surrounding properties. 1. 3 Legal Descrifition (Lot, Block, Tract) i Sae Prc-cise Plan of Street Alginwnt 1. 4 Project land area (acres) 5+ tlurnhex of parking spacrsc 1.5 Square feet of building area NIA (lumber of floors N/A 3.6 What is the percent and coverage proposed by the project for: a. Building b. Paving c. Existing landscaping NIA d. flew landscaping N/A ,. v n~Plant p spa lri ( A� 1r �3 +Mpn► r � s ' LAND, UW! USE ZONING GikR&L PLAN r , r M v -+� RZ-PD Awitm, iiiyh Daruiity resent s. � units . Ma�bile lx�mas a-3 Nrsside�ttial R-5 ropos ed 00' street ...,... G�-3 Mixed Use Gbnrnor�C3a7. Olcjtvwn Specific urroun di ng vacant si le & R2-PD Medium Demity north nulti-�famil.y tags. 01a town Speci fi MAO mobile Mixed Use - Corrmrci,al urrounding Vacant,, R-3 tiigh Density Hes. south how- park, some R-5 oil extraction lurrounding' Vacant R2-PU Mt.-dium Density Nesid. east urrounding Singh rrn�l.ti-fwnil C_3 Ali:ood Uft--t�mne ial . west sage �i1's extrac- tion lips What will be the maximum occupancy of all structures proposed within the project? WA 1. 9 List other public agencies having jurisdiction by law in approval, authorization , certification or issuance of a permit for this project: ❑ O.C . Flood Control District ❑ State Division of Highways 0 O.C. Sanitation District ❑ Corps of Engineers ❑ O.C. Air 11611ution Control Elcity council District �1 t:a Planning Commission Q California Coastal Zone Conservation Comiaxion ❑ Board of Zoning Adjustments ❑ Calf:orn is Regional rater ❑ d•saign Review Board Quality Control Hcard ❑ Otherr ❑ LocA`1 Ag"eacy Formation Cidmlmi s s ion --3- , t r r.' r ft' { 1 1 1 A ,t .t ;r , ,. ( r, .•`t t, l � .� 1 .,�I f �• 4, , •A • • t { � ( t f. A i I ':1 /1s ' f �,l r,rl,ir _ .�, I) �. y t .� 1 ' / �,�'=Ask �f "t r .,•„ , '� ►,' , `�l�, r It the 'pro n iiindusiri ilUbr it 'idantiiil . irbiat �� rar&iy disti�nci ' n' siiles ` 9rom tha proJact td . the 1 , • ne#liitf t , at Shoppri ng 'Grote r ww..rrif r r b Freeway exit A ce ales enta school refer to llecroation Areas ) t'l/ry ( Map �► d. Publics park (refer to Recisaeion Areas-map) less thin am ii1a e Scenic, Highway (refer, to Recreation Oaths , Coiridoci , and ` Areas Map) Pacific Coast l[ighway less then am mile 2r.0 ixii' ting Environmental settin of P 2.1 Seismic': t is the distance from the project L4. the nearest fa a. What ,,. tilt lire (refer to Fault Map) ? 200-1.200 ft. (so. Branch Fault` b. Is the project site within a designated carthgttake`, hazard area fez to Earthquake Hazard Special Study Zone Map) ? NO 2.2 drainage and Flood Control : a. Please describe specifically the volume of drainage and how it will be accommodated: ,t N/A z t b. Is the project within a flood hazard area? Yes Cr natural flood plain? YES (refer to Flood Plaines an3Flood Hazard Area Maps) Rxtrema eastern portion of project arm. C. What ,.is the diitance from the to the nearest flood channe l? (refer to Flood Control Channels Map) 2000' << (Ituntinytan Bwch Chwuvl) d. What is the distance from the project to the nearest shoreline?:• 1/2 mile 2 . 3 Top22ra hYz a. tie P j _ • s the ro ect site exhibit excessive slope? .'(re.Eer to Topography:Slope Map) __tq.Txoxhnat0ly 101 at one point A b. What is the distance from the project to the nearest bluff,?. (suer to Principal Vistas and Features Map) the project crosses- the Bluff c. What is the range and slope of the property' as it n'ow exists? . 0•-10$: slope generally towar& the southeast. the majority of t1w site is relatively leviel. .1 is. the property pr'656ntly graded? partlally ,. b. xndi`cata the g`raas 'cubic 'yards of grading k6posed`.' the. acres of Bind to' be .,graded , .the amount.. o earth to be,, transported on the . , and the amount of earth to be transported off Re FS e x h t and iade'of 'cut o _ c. What will- be the maximum h 'g g r after grading is completed? undetermii d de Is' the "s'urrounding area graded? Yes rf so, how 111. it affect subject property? portions o e sting mobile; have paik site will require fill. 2 . 5 Soils: a. Type of soil on the project site? F1rar DM Sandy Loam b. Are there any Peat and/or organic Soils on the site? NO '+ (refer to Peat and organic Soils Map) c. Does the site exhibit moderate to high expanstve' soils? ; NO (refer to Expansive Soil 'Distribution Map) 2. 6 Geologic: a. Is the sita,'wi thin a high risk geologic'. }proble NOm area? � ,(refer to Geotechnical Land Z•se Capability Hap) b. is the site within; an area which hap , experienced a variable and complex ,patterrn of land subsidence? (refer' to Land Subsidence Map) . 2. 7 tlis toric/Archaeal` ical • a. :Could `there osvibly be any . objectis. of ��istoric, aesttiet' • or;' arctiaeol icdl si nif.;i,cah6e 'on the site? .,: If so, plt�au�e;' . �J 9 ' describe. trefer to Arctiaealogical ' Sites 1listorlC -Landmark Sites and Princlpal Vl.s tas and Features Maps Bluff line (Scw' ' is Vista) 5- 2. 8 Wildlife/Ve etatrion': A g � 1� a. Does any wildlife use the site for a place to feed, neat . or rest? If so, p'lease ' llet: NONE e displaced by the ro os b. Will any of this wildlife b p 1'�, ed . project? if so, how? r, p p p,ar- c . Indicate ,the extent, size and species of lent lifex sently existing on the site. �. W EDS d. Indic"ate the location and area (in acres or square feet.} and type of plaint life to 'be removed as a ,result ' of thie project . include number type. and ' size of trees to be re•- moved. NONE 2. 9 Water Quality : a . Does any portion of the n'roject abut or. encroach on beaches , estuaries , gays , tidelands , or inland water area$7 J. NME b. Describe how the project will effect any body of waiter. IVA 2.10 Ai'r Qualit;�: an if the project is.., industrial? describe .. and list' ai.r pc' 1,- lu' ti'on sources And cptantity and types of pollutants emitted as a result of the project. WA ' r t r.;. b. List any ' Air' Pollution Control District equipmont r6'quirtod WA . r _ • r ' .11 Noise: a . Describe any ad3acent off--site r:oise sources ti.e. , airports, industry , Vreewsys) N/A b. What nriise will,. be' produced "by the ` roject? If, availabl'i- please"' give niolsevl level$ in`/decibel measurement and typ. caY time ;'distribution when noire will be produced. No nrw noise soixces will',be produc©d by this realigmmt.' 60-60 db during construction CO How will noise producred by the project compare with existing noise levels? 0-20 db increase during txnstruction. 10-15ts, incr.+oase aft6r ompletion due to increased vehicular traffic. 1 . 12 Traffic: a, Indicate the presents trafflc..volume on `arterials And added trips per day from the project. 5400 ALT an Atlanbi; 200000 Atrr on Lake sough of Atlanta 3900 Aur with of Atlanta Fby'increase AM on botli Uzke aril AtlanU, by 14-1514 b . What is the existing speed limit at the project location? 40 AP11 ai Atlivir.a 35 �V-11 on L:Lce c. Indicate points of egress and ir' `±ss to the ;pro ect . 3. 0 Public Services and facilities: . 3.'1 Water: a. Will . the project require installation - ur' replacearent of new water mains? txi b. Attach "a map showing the service area, sise and 10- `.,. cation oC new linen. CO Please extimO,tEe the daily volume in gallons required to serve the--;reject. -7 t � t �� �Syr Y � � .J '•)/' . . ''• Lit Sever:; f a: Will the 'proje require 'installation or irep'lace'rent. of new sewer aAin J? N4 = ;1 b. Attach a 'map,'stiowing :the aarvice area, size and ilocation '~ .,Of ,niw lines: WA 06 Dig "'Us's the, capacit-,� required f6r, the project 7,an,dl has this ' relates to existinfl effluent volumes within the system , WA 3. 3 Utility Lines : a . Indic ate liangch and type of now offsite transmission and distribution ' facilities required to serve project. , NOM .F, b. Do any overhead electrical facilities require ` relocation? YrS If so, please describe facilities. Poles )1A.OIXJ boNi Atlanta aM I&:a will rex7uire relocaUon and undergrowRrir c. Do existing linen have to be increased in number or. size for projeot? NO If so, please describe how. ' t 3. 4 Solid Waste } a. Describe the type and amount (pounds/'day) of solid waste generated by the project. WA Type: Pounds/Day ].5 Education at. For'. residential projects , note primary and, aecondao school districts : N/A Primary: Secondary : ,,t y ,'r�, . `• • y . ' I Ph •'�• _ Ile' r .7 l; ' PdPU1Ati6n;:bi'splaceserit: r; a. wills an y res i den tia1 occupants 'be .displaced` bk t;ie project - activities? Yi:S* if not, do not answer question tby t; b.. ids at ` is lthe total ML er of-' wide hts t b e-.c��paaced? Residents of 16 mobile hates (r1 .4 5) , . 2 dwellings and 'approxinkitely 2:apartmicnt. units (Al.'t• a) ��. � 3. 7 nemolition Wilt an rovementsFbe demolished or reWi red )3 "the Y Imp P � y " projectiYES r r, If so, answer questions b through d. ( b. Describe rriefly the type of buildings or improve;pents to be ' demolished by the }project. oil rhll and tat*.-,, residential units (see above) . c. List approximate volume of exported mate.r,ial .� Undetermined d . Indicate the, location and the distance to thr " site where exported material will tie dumped. UtxWerntined 4.01 Mitigating Measures : 4.11 Are . there meauures included in the project ,which iiay conserve resources (electricity, gas , water or wildlife) ? please describe. No 4. 2 Are there' measures proposed in the aesi 'n , p p 'g of, the project to re- duce noire pollution to personi occupying project? N/A I f so, pletise describe. 4 .3 Are there measures proposed �. iti the . design of the pr`oject to reduce noise pollution to persons -,,puiai.de of the projn`ct 'which ,is,' cau3ed by noise generated by the project? YES if so, p1048e diescribe Ccm'stnaction wn11 prdaml ill i1ceoiYi.-um with City sEaecafi��tion xeyatrdi a4 tqf ++�. Ocx trt'tion -wil l be c9Qnf!Jned t o normal working hours. i s :r if.a:instsviaion,;takes place -•9 in 'tom, near, future. - . r ' �r l; t :3+j tAr� !:� �rJ�; • .'t .mow`, t. 1 {r� P 9 • ' • tr�s�i•ts�'nt atid8landsca ine)arrhi ch havehbe:enocect r'.(:archi teetural oorda•nated►: with deiign"of ' the 'existing comunJ.ty to ialn' ieize visual effect? NO If 'so"'. please describe. '1 ?#re'lthere- measures or facilities`'deaAgned into the ,project to fiicilitate resources recovery (e.g. solar heating/special insulation et"c. Y? NO 5. 0 Alternatives : Are ttierej alternatives to the project which may result in a lesser adverse environmental effect? YE--S Please explain all project alternatives, 6.0 Additiontil Information : (regarding questions above) . If necessary attar a-daitional sheets. kiverse i gxict, can tK: by dclayitxt cmnsLr t:ion koU l after inTm t:ed land uses change. (La. n bile hams park) . t • 1 hereby ,certify ' that the information harein is true and 'accur-+te to the beat of my knowledge . April, x, 1979 gnature ateFiled , 5e or .Lvmr t city of iivatington Beach •ltactroa tss „10 r lS 'I •, r l rt.....�,.�,,,�_- 1. `{ P r , RESOLUTION, 140 . 422 4�I r ` A RE,�iOLUTIONaA=THB�RCIT,Y , UNCIL��OlTN6. � CI't''Y OF HUNTINGTON. BRACH'`ADOPTING PRECISE.'PLAN,;01r STRESS ALIGNMENT: NO' 79­4 , . ALTERNATIVE NO. a; . THE ,ALIONKW1T Op LAKE :TA=T BffV=M d6ma AVENUE AND` WAL8tr- AVXMUE AND ATLANTA AVENUE BETVZEN DELAWARY S"i"AW AND LAKE S' RUT WHEREAS , pursuant to the Planning and Zonint Law, pa0ti ouiarly California Government Code Section 65500 , the Planniing f Crxnmia+sion of the City of Huntington Beach , after notiae duly given , held a public p ng o April 17 19 .< heari n , T9 , to align ,pre- c1sely Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and A ilantR Avenue between Del&WLre Street and Lake Street; and On MAY T , 19T9 , after notice duly g`tven, haaring, ass hol d before this Council, and the tatter having been considered , the Council finds that aald Precise Plan 79-2 is reasonably neces- sar*y to the orderly end efficient flog or traffic , rar the pros nervation of the health and safety 61" thee,`; inhabltants of the City, and for the orderly development. of the community, NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tha City or Ifuntington Peach that the real property , shown on the map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto , ' incorporated heeein and ; by reference made a part hereof , is hereby deaignted end adopters as Precise Plan No . 79-2 of the City of Huntington Beach . and more particularly described as follows ; Thit ` particin of. Sactiona 11 and, 111 , Township 6 South, Raiige ii West ,� in 04 rancho Lae Solras , city or.. IfWi tington ',Beach, County of" Orange, S is tie of' Cal i rot,nIa:f as shown on it snap recorded in, book 51, ;rage 13 or Miscelli►neous Rapi in the office of the Courttx Recorder or said County described as follows: is ,12/12l79 ( 1 , Begltining a t ;the rote riecLion of the north-eou Ch quarter seation line_ a said Section.11; hav ng a . beariirg',. of north', with .the centerline `o'L Atlanta Avenue •as . shoran-on a: eiap' •" `� � .of the�}"Via t.1 .D+a1- Mar Tract r ri6ord+e` itt ` Book 4't?a e 5 of Misce _ g ieoun Ma 48 in l lla the'�oi'f di� of .the .Cbu'nty�;Ricorder;', thenae ' duepart al,nngr pa., d rcenta rl ine 205 25 tee h' poi nlbe6xnning "said point ,being ' the i�teriection ofnt centierlit►s�, ;of°�Atlantk Avenue , endt,ahe .eioiath'erly p`c,oh longation ��t, t a east;: line of Alaba�aa' Street �;A 60 00 Foot w o. atreet- as;- hown n a a i'dr;i+►aap'4or v ets� l�e1 Mar,.Trac t .9aid east :line., a� eo,; bring. tifie west line''of B1ock ::102 oil aaid Vista `'bel ' Mar .�'re�c t ;;' then:paRalbns said ;lino north 79 .91 feet ; .. thence south 89,t59,132" >reDt 60:0'1:. filet;=�,th k `'nontangent 'Curve; concsaYa ,.o r the.: ,,F y northMea t hav-ing a radius of; 32 00 feet � thence. south Nee'terly, wiiterly and northwestorlr; elon6 said curve through a c4ht:r4l angle of 212002109". . an-are, distance of '62:57: feat* �t6' a _ point pan a s compound curve concave to `the : nortte"A" "it having Via!'; radius , of 277.32" feet., a radial to said;'point bears south 2211011 41 "' we•t; thence continuing along staid '-compound curie .throwgh''a central anglii o'r 55047.' 47" , an are did ti►nci,"O'r 266`' a4 feet to a rei►eriie curve coneavel,to-, the '�southwest hav= 1 .. ; �. rag. rag a radius of 377 ,32 feet a: radial �,eari � to said point; of reverse,; curvature bears soutt, 77, 009128" Nest ; thence northwesterly along said ! curve through a central F rtgle or 27 *17 ' 4kj" an arc r distance of.1T9 .75 foot to a r averse curve concave ,to the' northeast having a radius of 32.00 feet , air rad.tal''4 to said, pol6t bears north 490 51' 47" cast; ther,me . northwesterly along said curve ' through a central angle of 40,e*a8 ' 13" , an are distance t of, 22. 42 Peet to 's point on this exit line of Lak- Street , shown as "Rai lroad,; Avenue , 90 fr„t, in w: i , shown,,, an a seep of Huntington 11eaeh' recorded )ok 3 Page 36 of Mibceltaneousi Maps In ,'che ofrice._,o. : C aunty Recorder of aa►id;.(;ounty,•, thence ' west 45 .00 t`ee ti Co ha centerline or said Lake Street ; 7e wnce south along iiaid centerline 137 50 h . ,►- , t' hence w�t�a t 45 00 feet , to a ., '.ee t t polnt on the westj�line!,of Bald 1 ike StreetA an id point being the most northei-ly ;corner of Block No . 301 ar shown on said menl:ion�ed map of N4ntington' Beach'; ._ thence along said "west ` I tLne , So, uth 378 ?5 feet to an a4ld;`p oint , te on of the :rautherYysaid angle paint -..ieling ineetl s t ln erlextenrion of; saidwr wy ex. tension of the agi�tl aastorly "llhe of DloCk shown on saiii mart at .Nuntingtonjl8each ; said southeasterly l lne,a lso . befna !;hit northwea ter�ly line of., Lake Streit ahoim as First S,tr.'set on said n�lip of Huntington '.11rnr+ thence South ' 41*21, '12" iiea`t 9�1 .;;�1 rest aloe said soiXth-� twit line and ifar , extension ; thianee south a� scat 100.00 feet to a 'point on it nonlA,ngent curve, concave 1' . . northwesterly having. a. radiaa of 350.00 feet; a radial bfar�' ig ci 'said point :bears north W36 45": west; thence rtiortit�earterly along raid curve, tMrough a central angle of g39''19!}ail",,an,;ara.'di•tancs ,of":_, ` 24 fe+et�t� to a. reverse curve :concave to ;.th `. ro'uthe ast having a . radxur of_32.00 c&`r, i rita .; ,,' r . . ,` � ., 1ej�'oCs: Q! 6' " ,:ern"uaro dist��ie �.l" t S.rthanae }northeear Le ciy alonf said reveres cu cv , 28.26 TeseiteQthence�� �` �o � '£ w ; ,.� . •cr,�r of th ro , h 3 09r h{ ,j , r: . ear t: 38'.�d� ` Paet`' to a no rth 50,', 25,. 5a vItr6ros"ti P rx .fir,V` qurve� concave. to tht south 'having a radiur',:ot` 32,00�-feot ; h; 61, n'orthiaitier'ip, easttr]y dsoutheaititrly along said° curve �;thcau h a oentral artale:+:'of 81°3�i'15" i►n are g die rti6cr ;..)f,.,.45 �b feet to' s reverse curve 66neave' to , th• E , northeast Navin a radius of 3?7.32: fast thrnaa• •outh- easterly and eas torly along said reverie eurvo through, a central aide of 44 °11, 551, an arc distance of, 2910' 07 feet; thence north 70 .00 feet to the true point of beglnnins.' PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hunt. ; ington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December , 1979• yo .. ATTEST: A FFROYEti AS TO FORM: eLICIA NRMIM"K,' cit clerkr-6 , zo a.putY t y e r y A REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED; VFD ty n a t ra or Develppw.-nt 8ervicea Dlewtor 3• 1 . 160, 4822 !: iTH9 CM CAL 1A CITY Q awls" MM Is ALICIA M. V MfM My the defy 4144ted s 'vilified City Clark of Ow City of Nuattagum kohe Nod ex-officto Clark of the r , y r: dy a w A6*r of City Cawwll of said Cit de Mori certify tbci the «bal wwors of the City COM14 of the city, of *Mtt%6toa Haub 19 'sewa; that the fotogoing r000lviios me pasaed aad adopted by tkA rffirrtive vote of more than a majority of all ths, Medwr• of said City CAMC11 at a regular stied thereof hold on the 17th day of DOUNdW 1f zwgw.,.,_1_, by MR followied rote: AY93: Cowie 11e*0: 'lb�. O wdir. rai I ►, pin I4Y �i�----' � YAYr �.i4Y.�.�111■.r�.lr M MU: �01Mt�lfreA: 9116L ,wMAZM t rattiaeon ABSW: Ceatorc i lsnu: ALIC2A M. I�rl1�10/!�"M City Clock Rod ex-offialo Clark of the city Cowell of the City of ioytoo doathl Caltlftrtsia by ftputy i� r: !� ! 7 CITY �f bsrrkgd mew- bV James N. Palin ���• Development Services am PROW JJanuaa 10 1a 80 Makvp M814iisl Atwel Xd1 a No R ty Ada t 1"182 Cro�Mrlllillti M 5 y-e-s Staten ew of In". pacarnrr►mrdetIon, Anslyok Funding Sows a. Atft na Wf Actions: �. .k�s STATEMENT= OF ISSUE : Attached herewith is an ordinance prepared by the City;;:Attorney ' a f i'ce tt 'establish configuration of that portion :of preciserPlan of , street 79�-2 which will affect the intersection,.. of Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street, at;d Orange Avenue. The City `Council on December 17, 1979 , adopted precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 by resolution . for the purpose of expediting iepleewntation of the plan with the understanding that an ordinance would be forthcoming . RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the City Council, adapt the attached ordin- ance so that official City Napa can be changed to reflect the new alignment . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Ordinance `2 . Map of Atlanta avenue, Orange Avenue, Lake Street intersection Respectfully submitted, a n , Director Dept . of Development Services JWP:JRBzdf PW rn.-4 Id al" �Y�oio:■tsnt Services k iwi by Pa t i n Oep�t Swum _�-� i.�_.-� ._...,.._.. Vl le PiL,I)A a! may],,., 30 . . 1979 Badwp Mstr' wt AttscMd Y ONO S�shject P Et-ISU a 'QE AT NO, PkECI,S9 'ALIGNMENT OF ATLXN'rA ''AVENUE BETWEEN DE4AMA1tE._ti' Iti:ET AND LAKE 'STREET AND LAKE STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUI Add WALNUT Avg:. City Administrator's Corns its Amirove as recommended Ststemfnt of 1ma. Rroomnrs tion, Analysis, Funding Soured, Altarnalve Actions; u� �TJ►TEM�N_Z QF IS5UE: G ` T�ransrnitrtzd for consideration is Pr ecise Plan of street Altdnment No. ': 79- 2 , which is the 'aligncm ant of Atlanta Avenue, between: Dalawarr- Street; and Lake Street and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue. RC(:Q M1 &Tlt)N The Plunnincl Conmission is r.conunending that_ the.. City Cc:unc i i alipl ovo Precise Man of Street Alignment. No. 79-2. Alternative 10 and di r,-(!t the 'C;t ty Att:orney' s Office to prepare an ordinance reflecting saiu a4ignment . Applicant : Initiated by City Councll Location : Intersection of Lake SLreet and Atlanta Avenue Request : Establish the. alignment of At nta Avenue, between Delaware Street and Lake '.street and Lake Street. between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and their intersection. ' CgMr Sg LdN 1&,TtON QN J LIt 17._-12 Z2 ' 0",.:'"0TION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY NAOME. TIII. COMMt.NION RK['i_1(N4hN:A:D h1tecisE PIJAN or; STIR ET A1sIGNMEN'i' NO. 79-2 TA THE CITY :COUNCIL FOR ApOPTI©N WiTli ALTEpNATI VE LAYOUT NO. , 10 BEl HG THE . RIECOMNDE D am" FIGURATION '`IN` C014CEPT ONLY' BY 'Mir. FOLLOWING VOTE:; AYF.S s Higgins, Russoll , Finley. Cohen, Paone NOES ; None ASSENT: Sternija:i 1 �, � P 89e Two aotfonal action taken at that meeting was the adoption of Ro 1 ON MOTION BY' PAONE AND SECOND BY. 1'AONE, RESOLUTION NO. 1246 A i AMENDED .TD REFLECT ALTERNATIVE NO. 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN_' MENT WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES Higgins , Russell , Finely, Cohen, Paone. NOES': None ' ABSENT: Stern , Bazil in 1970 ttie , Cith Council adopted Precise Nlar., of Str;�et; `�Al gnment' No: , 70-4 , which Is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue � Letween Delaware street and -Lake Street and Lake Street, -between orange Avenue,'and .Walnut Avenue. ,This alignment as adopted, • has' never been , constructed an , after numerous discussions, the City Council has reco► mended. that t4ia ;precise plan and ordinance be repealed and �, .new"'precise elan be established far this alignment . At the March * 19 , 1979 . City ' Council meeting, the Council directed the Planning Commmission to review alternative alignment designs and report , 6azk to the Council with its recommendation for a new precise Plan f6i this intersection. on Precise -,Plan 17, 1979. the Planning Commission, held a public hearing On Ap .. . of Street Alignment No. 79 ' 2. At this me: tins, the Commission reviewed ten alternatives arid a variation ' of one of those alternatives,. The, ten r,�l ternat i ves reviewed were the saute as those presented t:o they Planning Commission as part of Precise Plan of Street Alignment N'o. 78-4 . After reviewing ll eleven of the alternatives. the Planning Commission selected Alter native No. 10 to be presented to the City► Council as the conceptual design for the Lake . Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment . Attached are both the si,aif reports from Pre else Plan of Street Alignment No. 78•-4 dated Aesdust 1 , 1978, and from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 dated Apri1 17. 1979 . The original ten alternatives are discussed in detail in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 78-4 . white Alternative 4A is discussed in Precise Plan of Street Align- ment No. 79-2 . KNV I ROt!ME.r4 z' S: Procise Han of titreet Alignmwnt No. 79-: .'W.::: fr:r e;nVirunueont i offecLs under Nogat.ive Declaration No . 79-21). This neyati.vu, cioelsra- tion 'addronsed Litt ton or Lhe proposed Oer t;:r .1 :tian ,No. 79-;9 was ported ror the prescribed 'tctnyth or, time, in the Office of the City Clerk and the IIunL inciton Beach indeapendtsnt . No comxents ware received by the Planning Department . either i`n writing or oral , during -or after the posting period. e X AO- 4p if — tit. .01 t r ,` Z� t P§f cis E PLAN Of STREET ALIGNMENT ?T - 3. ; A LT E R ib A T E tQ. ATL ANTA / l A K E ' ' C 1 �y w 1•.••wwrwi• CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS m►�pita er Cm axra. \ ) RESMUTlal No A-W-MC SAM LEGEND • \«� _. .._.. ii[[wAr 5T1�Ef C�Ai1107� POWARY '300 O .- .. NOT E ., wet wame"r tarw'l rrro YI ow (—!v lei .10 MJ . r •�" r t • l I CITY, OF �'°�• a HUNTINGTON BEACH - aRAWt CMATr , CALIF~ 1 1 y. r�e CITY OF, HunflnGTon BEA H JI DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION 17141536•5241 PLANNING DIVISION 1714)SX 5271 r�� P. 0. Box 180, HUNTIMGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA9Z648O r PpS� TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN : Floyd G. Belsito , City Administrator FROM: Department of Development Services DATE ; December 14 , 1979 SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM G-7 - RESOLUTION NO. 4822/PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-2 Attached herewith is Resolution No . 4822 to establish the configuration of.. that portion of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 79--2 which k, 1l,,:effect the intersections of Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street; ' and Orange Avenue. We have elected to submit this resolution to you fcr immediate implementation of this precise plan, as there currently exists some development pressure in the immediate area . An ordinance will follow concurrently with Preclse� Plan of Stre9t. Alignment No . 79--3 for the southerly extension of Lake Street to Pacific Coast Ifighwayl this pre- cise plan will be submitted for your January 7 , 1984 meeting . Because of the delay between the original public Bearing on this matter and > his submittal, all material that waa. presented for review at your May 7, 1979 hearing has been attached tothis comi::uni.catior; for informa- tional purposes . We have also attached the minutes of the May 7 meeting , at which time conceptual approval for Alternative No . 8 was given by the Council . Staff will be prepared to discuss this item further with you at your December 17 , 1979 meeting . Respectfully submitted , a7mesW. Palin Director JWP: df Attachments : AuguEt 1 , 1978 staff report for P. P .S .A. 78-4 AprW,30, 1979 Request for Council Action Minutes of May 7 , 1979 Council mi:,etirg Resolution No . 4822 !�Y fi W i I l � w _....----- ..+ r ���Af ' i� r�►�ivp�N+ram �. � -•, _ . ... .,004 I ,► 1 I Ii ! 1 �� �; I w 1 r.✓ 7 .. -..4N. `. 1 01ti IF �!A 1 � 4 JJqdo • / $ILIIf 'rs '� L � i'• '•��. ♦ram % I� �����, r oft t ,r06F POro v i . .I: M ti 1 wee' 6. l 1 . . •!7+i C%r •-- -- -•. _. _.tom .--- ... r ' m 70 � w I m a 1 Res. Nu. OF t.A1,100KN1A COMM of ORAMIE CITY 07 HUNTINOTON REACH j 1 , ALICIA M. KfNri1ORTH, the duty elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington beach, and ex-officto Clerk or the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the uho1e number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; than the foregoing resolution was passed ana adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of acid City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19 , by the following vote: AUS: Councilmen NOES: Councilmen; ABSHN'r: Councilmen: t c t ` City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of thi City of Huntington Beach, California i e t l . I r i EYHIBIT "A " 64 xO '036 P rh ♦ •IM I• !,. LAKE STREET 1 ♦ w� f _ / L Or f I oil v.^... yam.•. ►_ 3% . 1 .�! a.•s * Z y s. ...1.••..• .ram.WON- ...par •I•P a ALAb,�MA STREET alvis X3 !!f!4lYtl3 IRI'CISE ALL AN At At JjCAOAflW s - ...•:.,p a.►.... , ,. A T( A/YTA AVE - ORA AoV4f AVE � --- LAME 3TReer /AFC Ng 19 -2 I ' COTr bJ MUM?IAI6TOM REACH Ulf l northwesterly having; a radius of 350 .00 feet ; a radial FWW% hearing; to said joint hears north 48038148" west. ; thence f, nnr•therintr!rly along saki curve through a central angle of 39019141 " nn me distance of 240. 24 feet to a reverne curve concave to the southeast linving a radius of 32.00 feet ; thence northeasterly alon said reverse curve through a central angle of 50032104" an are distance of 28 . 2E feet ; thence north 5002515011 east 38 .04 feet Co a curve concave to the south hnving a radius or 32 .00 feet ; thence northeasterly, easterly and southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 81 °34 ' 15" an are distance of 45.56 feet to a reverse curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 377 .32 feet ; thence south- easterl� and easterly along .na1d reverse curve through a central angle of 44011 ' 55" an arc distance of 291 .07 feet ; thence north 70 . 00 feet to the true point of beginning . PASSED AND ADOPTED t)y the City Council oV the City of Hunt- ington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th clay of December- , 1979. Mayor .<< A TIT EST: APPROVED AS TO FOAM: 94, 94�u City Clerk City Attor AI:VIF.WF:I) AUD ..^. PPROVED: I111TIATED Alin APPROVED: Cit y drni nistrator �►eloprnent Services Director 3 1 RESSOLUTION NO . A HNSOLUTION OF THE evy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF E{UtMVIGTON BEACH AFK?MING PRECISE PLAIT OF STREET A110NMENT NO . 79-2, ALTFRNATIVE 11O. 81 THE ALIT Ni4ENT OF GAKE: STRRET I3E""I'WEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND WAF,NUI' AVENUE AND ATLANTA AVENUE RKNE:E•aN DUAWARK. STREET AND LAKE STREET WNIIERFAS , pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law, parti- c>>larly California Government Cone Section 65500 , the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Bench , after notice duly ,given , held a publ. 1c hearing on April 17 , 1.979 , to align pre- cisely Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street; and Lake Street ; and On May 7 , 1979 , after notice duly given , hearing wan held before this Council , and the matter having been considered , the Cou►lclj finds that said Frecise Plan 79-2 is reasonably neces- h : sary to the orderly and efficient now of traffic , for the pile- servation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city , and for the orderly development of the community, NOW , THEREFORE: , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eluntington Peach thH t the real property, shown on the map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto , .incorporated herein and by reference made R part hereof , is hereby designated and adopted as Precise Plan No . 79-2 of the City of Huntington Beach and more particularly described an follows : That portion of Sections 11 and 14 , Township 6 South , Range 11 West , In the Rancho Las Bol sa s , City or , Eluntington Reach , County or Orange , State of Call ' fornia , as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described as folloon: 1 . JG: be 12/12/79 Opt, 1 fill l III,; ttt t:h�' InL#►t'Ci(°�'t. lfIII (If' 1.111, fit$1.11►--poll 111 (ltsn rtv I, sloo u on 1 1 nt, or nn 11) 11oc t I nn 1 1 lsrt v l itl; st i-•,, hl?n t-1 mr, of north , wt tts tiler evritnr I triv of At. innt:t Avvrsui! an nhnwn on n real) o l' Qw, V l n tat Dn 1 t•In r Trrie t rs-r.nrilc-d In Hook 11 Vajre 'I (it' Mi ncr. l Irnr.rnin liaps; , in the: orl'ice or the Country ttevorder ; tht.-neo dice vane along said centerline 205 .25 feet to the true Point of beginning vald point being the intersection of the centerline of Atlanta Avenue , and the southerly pro- longation of the east line of Alabama Street , a 6o .o foot wide street , as shown on nald map of Vista Del Mar Tract , said east line n1so being the west line of Block 1.02 of said Vista Del Mar Tract; thence along said line north 79 .91 feet ; thence south 89 °59 '32" wets t 60.01 feet to a nontangent curve conv'xve to the northwest having a radius; of 32 .00 feet ; thence south- westerly, westerly and northwen terly along :said curve through a central angle of 112*0210911 , an a:,c distance of 62 .57 feet to a point on a compound curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 277 . 32 feet , a radial to said point henry south 22°C1 ' 41 " west; thence continuing along said compound curve through a central angle or 55 "07 ' 47" , an arc distance of 26 . 84 feet to a reverse curve concave to the southwest hav- ing a radius of 377 .32 feet; a radial bearing to said point of reverse curvature bears south 77009128" west ; thence northwesterly along; said curve through a central angle of 27017141.11 are arc distance of 179 .75 feet to a reverse curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 32. 00 feett a radial to said point bears north 490 51 ' 47" east; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 40008 ' 13" , an are distance of 22. 42 feet to a point on the east lane of Lake Street , shown as Railroad Avenue , 90 feet in :tidth, shown on a map of Huntington Beach , recorded in Hook 3 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County ; thence west 45 .00 feet to the centerline of said Lake .Street ; thence south along said centerline 137 .50 feet ; thence west 45 .00 feet to a poi on the west line of said Lake Street , said point being the most northerly corner of Block No . 301 as shown on said mentioned map of Huntington Beach; thence. along said west line south 378 . 25 reet to an angle point , said angle point being lntersectlon of the southerly extension of said west line and the northeasterly`_ex- tension of the southeasterly line of Block No. 201' as shown on said map of Huntington Beach; saId.,southeasterly line also being the northwesterly line of bake Street , shown as First . Street on said map of Huntington Beach; thence South 4102111211 west 94.34 feet along said south- east line and its extension ; tiience south 48 038148" east 100 .00 feet to a point on a nontangent curve , concave 2 . Nude e?ei - council Minutt 517/79 ADM1h lS'.'''J1il Vi* St PAttAT 101l - r.1T��1111 rMf'L(IY1�11:11T 1100Nl N(i - Rt:11 79• lg� •M+..++...•,r v.•r...s.�..r..��.-�•..r..ww w,+rr�wwr..w,r- ...w + •.� .++ wn. .-wti..�..-r, F They C. 1.0. a e.runvurr l cir t ion (rime t Ire, 'CRY ly A+i ai tr i t r-r 1 ur rioctr+kiuind i lit lilt+ (!%Iair) if.h►nc►trt. eri' the Ilunl irultern flv.erlr Employment rind fr.ififlml At idnistration +rs a ire'i v d te.%, ntirr-f it o i i L ttrx-e Acitip t L or poril t i un. This V,yru l►1 du I t-1l,t tie the vespurrs 1 lr i 11 ty for CETA prograurs in the ci ty tract~ to the. ftaruje County Manpower Coital ssion. with th'e stipulation that al i such monies be authorized annually by the City to the newly-established corporation for CETA program administration and operations directed to Huntington Beach residents. Counci lwuman bailey asked if other cities have implemented this type of action and questioned the Ci ty' s financial responsibility. The Manpower Achrinistrator stated that an affirmative vote on this item would indicate Council approval in concept and that staff would prepare a contract that would spell out costs and responsibilities of the proposed program. Councilman MacAllister inquired GIs to whether this action retold reduce the City's ; administration costs , and the Manpower Adflnistrator st,.ted it would reduce direct and indirect costs, one of which would he a reduction ir.1 iability insurance. On motion by Bailey, second MacAllister, Council Conti Vied consideration of establish- ing the 1lrmtineiton Beach En4iloyment and iraininri Admin0tration as s, privatEt, non- profit, tax-eX.e:i►f,t corporation to the May 21 , 1979 meeting by the following vote: AYES: Pattinson, Mandic , MacAllister, Yoder NnF.S: T homa s ABSTAIN: Bailey ABSENT: hone PUtitlt: HEARING - PP5A 79-2 - ALTERNATIVE #8 APPROVED - tiU 79-24 - aaoPtEo Mayor MacAllister announced that this was tine day and hour set for a public hearing on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 which is�,a proposal to precisely align Lake Street between Orange and Walnut Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between �,.elaware and Lake Streets . Also for consideration were ten different alternatives relating to this .alignment. The Planning Ctwinission reconv;ended Alternative No. 10. The Council cun;idered Negative Declaration No. 79-29 in connection with the precise plan of street. alignment. Tile City Uewrk informed CDunci l that all legal requirements for publication, notification and posting had been met and that she had received no conrnun{catirans or written protests to the matter. The Acting Planning Director presented a veiwgraph depicting', Alternative Nos. 10 4A and 4. He presented an explanation of each alternative. t. Kllyor MacAllister declared the hearing open. Mr. Jirm'V,�n Derhyden addressed Council and stated that he supported the alternative recormrended by staff. There being no one further present, to speak on the matter and thtre being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Page 07 - Council Minutes - 5/7/79 The Director of Public World spoke regarding the ramifications of Alternative No. 10. t , A motion was made by Yoder, ►econded by MacAllister to approve Alternative No. 4A. The mat.ion failed by the following vote: AYES: MacAllister, Yoder NOES: Thorias , Mandic , Bailey ABSTAIN: Pattinson ABSENT: None A motion was made by Mandic , seconded by Bailey to approve Alternative No. 6. Following discussion. the motion failed by the fa; iowing vote: AYES : Mandic NOES Thomas,, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder ABSTAIN : Pattinson ABSENT: None A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by MacAllister, !n- approve Alternative 08. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey NOES: Thomas, Yoder ABSTAIN: Pattinson ABSENT: None On motion by Bailey, second . Thornas ." Council adopted Negative Declaration No. 79-29. (, approved Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2 Alternative No. 8, and directed the City Attorney to prepay* an ordinance reflecting said alignment. Motion carried unanimously, with Councilman Pattinson abstaining from the vote. PPSA 70-4 REVOCATION - uRD NO 2360 - INTRODUCED The City Clerk presented a comnunicaticn from the Planning Department relative to Ordinance No. 1633 which' would revoke Precise Plan of Street Al igrVient. No. 70-4 the alignment of ( 1 ) Atlanta Avenue from 12651 ,west of Beach Boulevard to Lake Street, (2) Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway and (3) Olive Avenue. between Lake Street to 135' west of 2nd Street. On March 19, 1979 a public hearing was held on this matter with decision continued to consider in conjunction with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-2. The Clerk was directed to read 'Ordinance No. 2360 by title "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY 'REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1633 , AN AMENDMENT TO DISTRICT MAP 16. " On motion by Bailey, second Mandic, Council approved introduction of Ordinance r No. 2360 by the following Grote: AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, ' Yuder NOES: ,,, Thomas. ,ABSTAIN: Pattins"on ABSENT: None . , � � , ter•.- � �' w4 ....j - ��` •` .� r� Tom, �; • i ` - T I/Jj 1 0 J � it cp Fl- I PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 77 - 3. � . ATLAi�ITA / LAKE A �• jFR � ATE 10. z �s .j s '3 = t f 1 t .i• ..-...1 �`�-►.. ...—.- ——.ice__ . • � i IIl �'SiGAS RI{;�1kCiS _ -r-WcC•it wt-Ctir[� CITY Of HUNTINCTOP4 AIAI:- EXESTM CONDITON "1 PRZ ISE PLAN OF S ':?EET A' IGN—,E`'T 73-4 .�,r.Y. ,�, . , ., r.•I �11 I . ,. l l ,I t l +� r� • r I M1 to 00.017, I do ` �� (`�ri.i�'�'r: ...rr/J' 'c 111 I •41 '• F1c Ilu / l l No kilt 10, .01 ��� r•" �•• :i {. ..�', �' � ICJ � PROJECT A �t` 1 f I C', or � ' • , 'JII I i J .01 cot, , 1 a hu "I'Migton' beach planning depariment pL PPSA 79- 2 rla�l v Three I )N IJc}'1 WN I IY t'c►11 EN AND !;V.('()NI) I)Y 1110, 1 I NS Nha'sAT I VE 1)I:)'I,AI(A'1'l()N No. '19- 29 WAS ADOPTED BY TIIE FOLL))WINO VO'1'1~.: AYESs Higgins , Russell , Finley , Cohen, 11done NOES : None ABSENT: Stern, Bazil FUNQLNO SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACT1'ON s The Council may consider any of the other alternatives that were submitted to the Planning Commission on April 17. 1979 . Each of the eleven alternatives are hart of the attached staff reports and each has been analyzed for both advantages and disadvantages. .SUPhOR'rjNc 1NF'QRMA'I'10N: I . Area Map 2 . Planning Commission Staff Reports dated August 1 , 1978, April 17 . 1979 , :►�' 3 . Negative Declaration No. 79-29 Respectfully submitted. amen W. Polin Acting Secretary JWP: SMB:gc RECKJEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Jamen W. Palin DQp#rtmontDevelopment Services - Planning Date Prepared __April 9` , 19 79 Backup Material Attached [3 YN ONO Subject W.,TERNATIVE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT TO REPLACE EXISTING PRECISE PLAN NO. 70- 4 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended . �ipiti Ily w P#� �11 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: An alternative street alignment for the intersection of. Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue to replace existing Precise Plaii of Street Alignment 70-4. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Continue Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70-4 to the May 7 , 1979, City Council meeting . ANALYSIS : At the March 19 , 1979 City Council meeting at the time Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 70-4 was before the Council for public hearing , the item was continued to April 16 to allow the Planning Department to once again set the alternative designs on the intersection of Lake and Atlanta before the Planning Commission at a public hearing for a recom- mendation to the Council concurrently with your action on P.P.S.A. 70-4. The Department was unable to get this new alignment (79-1) before the Planning Commission for its April 3, 1979 meeting and it has subsequently been set for review for recommendation by the Commission at its April 17 meeting. Therefore , if the Council wishes to hear Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-1 in conjunction with 70-4 , it will be necessary to continue the hearing over to allow this new intersection design to catch up with the prior precise plan. The property owner who appeared before the Council and the Commission in regard to this matter hae been informed of this delay. The staff will be prepared to respond for additional clarification if necessary at your April 16, 1979 meeting. R pe c t fu 1 y s ted, 4 Jme* M. Palin, Actinq Planning Director /. r.. F � � •�1,M'11'If1��11 � M�rrrin� -A-- !- Import TO: Planninq Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: August 1 , 1978 RE: PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES FOR PR•LCISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 (ATLANTA/LAKE) 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Select Alternative 3 or 9 as the preferred alignment . 2 . Direct staff to set Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 70 -4 for public hearing at the September 6, 1978 meeting . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION : On July 5, 1978 , the Planning Commission adopted Resolution: of Intention No . 1225 initiating proceedings to revoke Precise Plan of Street Alignment 70-4 and to adopt a new precise plan for the inter- s ction of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street . This report presents a summary of all ton ( 10) alternatives that have been considered by the P :anning Commission to date. Included in the report is a drawing of each alterna'tive , a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative , and the associated estimated cost, to implement each alternative . 3 . 0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES : Vie primary areas of concern with regard to these Precise Flan alternatives are as follows : (1 ) The impact of the alternatives on local circulation patterns . In particular , the impact on east/west circulation and downtown/ beach access . (t) The cost of implementating the .alternative, including right-uf-way acquisition, relocation, and construction. (3) Engineerint feasibility of the alternatives, including safety .I considerations . t� Adftr � PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO, 440 ANALYSIS : hreoiso Plan of Street Al iclnment No. 70-4 was ad0j)Lvd in February , rff4 1571 , and wag intended to provide a direct eaSt/well;t connection between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street utilizing Atlanta Avenue and a one-way couplet composed of Oranges Avenue and Olive Avenuo . Althoutah the goal of improving east/west circulation in the downtown area has been retained , the concept of the one-way couplet , which was an integl•,al part of , the 'Cop-of-the-Pier Plan , has been deleted from the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways . As a result , PPSA 70-4 no longer reflects the City ' s circulation plans and objectives . I In 1917 , the Planning Staff developed five alternatives for a new precise plan for Atlanta and Lake . All five alignments called for a 100 foot width on Atlanta (presdntly 60 feet wide) with the additional right-of-way coming off the south side. 'Three of the alternatives pro- vided a direct connection between Atlanta and Or►anele , accomplished by curving Atlanta northward between Huntington Street and Lake . Alternative 4 corresponded essentially to the existing configuration , with Atlanta intersecting Lake at right angles . Alternative S proposed to terminate at Atlanta , which was to curves southward to intersect with pacific Coast Highway utilizing the existing Lake StrcuL right-of-way . At its .June 22 study session, tho Pl,inn. my Conuni ss loti d i rec'tvd staff to prepare additional alternatives based on :.11V folluwiny criteria : (1) the Atlanta Avenue right-of-way should be 80 feet wide : (2) a direct connection should be provided between Atlanta and Orange : ( 3) impacts on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta should be minimized . Four new alternatives (Altern.stIves 6 , 1 , 6 and 9 ) were developed by staff and presented to the Planning Commission at the July 18th meeting . These i<lignments involve significant dosiyn problems due to undesirable curve radii and sight distances . An alignment that provided an adequate radius would necessarily have .a greater impact on developed parcels on the north side of Atlanta , since the curve would begin ,at a point closer to Iuntington Street . Therefore , choosingamong lhes< alternatives involves a tradeoff between design safety/traffic : low considerations and the cost of right-of-way acquisition and rvlocatiun. The rollowing discussion prLsents a summary of each of the tvil alternative alignme'nts that have been previously considered by Lill! Planning Commission . 4 . 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 would provide_ a 100 fuot wide right-ref--way and would be realigned north to intersect with Orange Avenue at Lake Street . The 100 foot wide right-of-way would be maintained to 3rd Street at which t VV Y + PRECLSE PLAN OF STREET ALIGN VNT Nil. 70--4 Page a paiitt the right-of-way would ool%t intle at. itt; Iirt-rictit width of 75 Ivi" : . Thu, ligament would require purchaut, of propoi-ty and relucal Ion uC portions living in hutisit«1 structures lying within the- propust-d right-of-way . Alternative 1 would also entail the cul -de-sarinci tit three local streets . Alabama Street would be cul-de-sated whore it intersects with Atlanta Avenue. 2nd Street and Olive Street would bo cul -de-sated at Lake Street . 4 . 1 . 1 Alternative 1 Advantages 1 . Provides an east/west connection between peach Boulevard dnd Goldenwest: Street . 2 . Provides a parallel street to Pacific Coast Ifighway that will relieve traffic congestion along Pacific Coast highway. 4 . 1 . 2 Alternative L Disadvantages 1 . Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 2 Alternative 2 provides for Atlanta Avenue to be designed at a 100 foot right-of-way and swing north to intersect with existing orange Avenue at. Lake Street. This alignment does not require the purchase of land west of Lake Street as is the case under Alternative I . However , the Alternative 2 alignment would require the acquisition of more land east of Lake Street . 4 . 2 . 1 Alternative 2 Advantages 1 . Provides a direct east/west connection between Beach 13oult:varci anti Goldenwest Street . 1 . Would not require acquisition of properties west of Lake Street . 3 . Provides a parallel street to llacifi.c Coast highway . 4 . 2 . 2 Alternative 2 Disadvantages 1 . Cost may be prohibitive. 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 3 Alternative 3 Alternative 3 partially recognizes the financial and social costs that are characteristic of Alternatives 1 and 2, by providing for fewer residences to be _-relocated . Alternative 3 provides for a 100 foot r iyht-of-way using the existing curb line on t ho north side of Atlanta Av(snue .is the north boundary of the Atlanta Avenue Street section t' 1 z�xt+�niling from B4�ach dou L�ward to intersect Lake Street half ws+y . between �..►f Oranyc: Avenue and 011ve Street. PRECISE PLAN OF STREE ALIGNMENT NO. 75-4 Page 4 Alternwtive-, 3 , while it does not provide for a direct connection between Atlanta Avenue and Orango Avenue , can he designed to purnnit a smooth fluw of traffic between the two atrooL:: throug11 the onLablishment of a siysia1ization program. Propor sidna1 phasing between Orange .*11161 At, laaa would accomplish the gon 1 of provid i nq for improved c rlst/west traffic flow between reach boulevard and Goldenwest . Alternative 3 would require the cul-do-:--ac:iny of Olive Avenue and 2nd Street . 4 . 3 . 1 Alternative 3 Advantages 1. While total cost continues to be high , a reduction in acquisition , relocation and construction costs over Alternatives 1 and 2 are realized. 2. Relocation of residences would be lessened . 3. The goal of developing improved cast/west traffic flow between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized . 4 . Minimizes impact on property on northwest curner of Atlanta and Alabama 4 . 3 . 2 Alternative 3 Disadvantages 1 . Potential for traffic delays 2 . Uprooting and relocation of persona from residential units . 4 . 4 Alternative 4 Alternative 4 provides for continuation of the existing alignment and taking art ,'•dditional 40 feet from the property on the south side of Atlanta Aveue, thus providing a 100 foot right-of-way . A signalization program as discussed under Alternative 3 would be established, Olive Avenue and 2nd Street would be cul-d-u-saced under Alternative 4 . 4 . 4 . 1 Alternative 4 Advantages 1 . While total cost continues to be high , a reduction in acquisition, relocation and construction costs over Alternatives 1 and 2 are realized . 2 . Relocation of residences would be lessened . J . The cioal of developing improved east/west tra f f icy f low betwul-11 Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street would be partially realized . 4 . Minimises impacts on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . Y� y" Y PKICINE: PLAID OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 Page 5 4 . 4 . 2 ' Alternative 4 Uisadvantagvs 1. Potential for traffic delays 2. Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 . 5 Alternative: 5 Alternative 5 is different in concept to the first four alternatives , 'in that it: does not: provide for the direct Atlanta/Orange link . Atlanta is proposed to swing southward to Pacific Coast Highway , utilizing the existing Lake Street right:-of-way. Lake would curve eastward and terminate in a "T" intersection at Atlanta . As a result, this alternative would deemphasize Lake Street as a primary arterial and favor Atlanta Avenue . Beach traffic would tend to utilize Atlanta as an access route to and from peach Boulevard . This configuration would do very little to improve east/west circulation or downtown access. Alternative 5 is the least expensive of the proposed alignments , since it impacts vacant land. it also provides for increased traffic safety, since the configuration would involve fewer vehicular con- flicts than the others . The alternative would require the construction of a cul-de-sac on Olive Avenue . 4 . 5 . 1 Alternative 5 Advantages 1 . Least costly alternative. 2 . Superior design .Features and intersection configuration. 3 . Minimizes impact on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . Provides slightly improved Beach access in the event Lake is not extended north . 4 . 5. 2 Alternative 5 Disadvantages . 1 . Does riot improve east/west circulation or improve: downtown access . 2 . Interrupts Lake Street traffic . 3 . Uprooting and relocation of persons from residential units . 4 .6 Alternative 6 This alternative provides for an eitihty foot ciligzune�nt on Atlanta , c:tirviny northward starting at a point about 340 feet west of the . center line of ItuntingLan Street . The radiuts of this curve is 400 feet for a design speed of 35 mph . The intersection of Atlanta and hake would involve a triangular, arrangement to accommodate turning move- mentts . fiec Ruse of sight distance problems and undesirable inter- auction confiqurationas cul -de-sacs on 2nd Street abd Alabama Str*tt are prolwred as part of this precise plan. 11JA 151: PLAN OF STHLET ALIGNMENT NO . 78-4 Page f A i tariiat ive 6 would necessitate the acquisition of one detached dwelling on the northeast corner of Atlanta and Alabama and sixteen mobile homes on the south side of Atlanta east of Huntington Street. � The repiainder of the right-of- way needed is currently vacant . A portion of the existing Atlanta right-of-way would be declared surplus and a►old to partially offset the acquisition cost . 4 . 6. 1 Alternative 6 Advantages . 1 . Better design (curve radii , sight distances ) than Alternative 7 and 8 . 2 . Establishes talanta/Orange connection to improve downtown access , east-west circulation. 4 . 6. 2 Alternative 6 Disadvantages 1 . Cost nay be prohibitive , 2 . Involves relocatiot, of residences . 3 . Design is less desirable than Alternatives 9 and 10 . 4 . 7 Alternative 7 Alternative 7 is similar to 16 in concept , but is designed to avoid compleLely the dev�-loped properties north or A~ lanta . in order to a7c:c:onipl ish this , the ncedvd curve- ri-Witis is appr-oximately 325 foul . This a l ternaL i ve also shift:; orango Avenue ti! I-Lillt ly Lu the south and requires the acquisition of one unit on the routhwost. corner of Orange and Lake . As with Alternative 6 , cul-de-sacs are proposed on 2nd Street and Alabama Street . 4 . 7 . 1 Alternative 7 Advantages 1 . Cost may be prohibitive . 2 . Minimizes impact on property on northwest corner of Atlanta and Alabama . 4 . 7 . 2 Alternative 7 Disadvantages 1 . Very poor design features (curve radii , sight distances) . 2 . Poor intersection design at Lake Street . 3 . Costlier than Alternatives 8 and 10 . 4 . involves relocation of residences . 4 . 8 Alternative 8 This alignment is the most radical design proposed providing for a curve radius of 300 feet and a design speed of about 30 mph. It therefore represents a trade off in favor of lov;rost at the expense of safety and smooth traffic flow . Cul-de-sacs would be constructed on 2nd Street and Alabama . ` .1 + IVRl C.1SE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 Pago 7 4 .a . 1 Alternative 8 Advantages I . Accomplishes Atlanta-Urange eonnectiun. 4 . H . 1 Alternative 0 Uisadvantage :i 1 . Highly undesirable curve: radii , sight distances , and intersect4on configuration . Could pose significant safety problem. 2 . Involves relocation of residences. 4 . 9 Alternative 9 Alternative 9 is a much more moderate design titian tho previous throvt providing for a curve radius of 800 feet . This necessitates beginning the curvature at a point about 150 feet we..st- of the canter line of Huntington Street, resulting it, severe impacts on developed property north of Atlanta. It is estimated that at least twenty-one units would be affected and require relocation . As a result , this aliyrunent is the most expensive of the ten alternatives . 4 . 9 . 1 Alternative 9 Advantages 1 . Accomplishes Atlanta/Orange connection . 2 . Design features are superior. This is the vest alternative from a traffic flow/circulation point of vie:.;. 4 . 9 . 2 Alternative 9 Disadvantages 1 . Costliest of all alternatives . 2 . involves sub-.­'..intial relocation . 4 . 10 Alternative 10 Alternative 10 provides for exactly the same design as is shown in Alternative 5, with the exception that the, right -of-way width west of Huntington Street. is 90 feet . The same advantages and disadvantages that were indicated under Alternative 5 apply to Alternative 10 . Alternative 10 overall cost may he the least of all alternatives , including Alternative 5 since right -of-way acquisition and construction cost •,►could he reduced by the difference between a 100 feet right-of-wary and oan 80 foot riight-of-way . t� flRUC1 SS PLAN OF STRWr ALIGNMENT NO. 78-4 page 8 4 . 11 Cost Summary Alternative flight-of-Way Relocation Lake St . Construction Total :. Acquisition Gxistiny 1 /7000000 286 , 000 340 , 000 370 , 000 2 , 696 ,00+s 1 7408000 256, 000 343 , 000 220 , 000 1 , 556 ,000 2 630, 000 266, 000 3400000 2201000 1165±61000 3 500 , 000 2400000 340 , 000 206 , 000 1 , 286 ,000 4 506, 000 240 , 000 3400000 210, 000 11290, 000 5 591 , 000 240 , 000 0 2300000 1 ,061r00U 6 705 , 000 255 , 000 340 , 000 180, 000 1 ,480 ,0Ou 7 675 , 000 255 , 000 340 , 000 2000000 11470 * 000 8 600j000 255 ,000 340 , 000 1800000 1 , 375 , 00t1 9 675 , 000 298 , 000 343 , 000 1800000 1 ,693 , 000 10 591 , 000 240j000 0 230 ,000 lo061pUOU 'e? 2 q 0?8 W014 �J .1� VR .D _ - i � i ♦7.�..�w w�I�r - - t � �, , I •� � _-....-. .._. ��Jam..-. �._- _ - ._ i f � I REviilohl REfEItNCRS ••r�ac�•�s x.c•wsr�' i ` t c Of "U"TIPIGTOx " �+y .s• .y ExisT NG cc*mn N PRECISE PLAII OF STA£L:T ALIGN-1ENT 78-4 ATLANTA/LA.VL • - •' ` � � IYL! e-! IUD - - f op ..u7, .- lb c - � RIFINa4CIS ...--.•._.. . ._ _ - . A Nara . Y J. • - l �' ✓ • �� tip •' , � � r irc..vs.+ s►fwwi .t f . wl�t►S►Q�eS RIfERt1lCtS �'~ - z LOr -------------- • i f S•• A/Ytfloils REi1RINCEi 4pq e th '�` .� •�� Mail Q.'IQ od J ,: sfv�slcks Rt�cRt++ccs _ �� ALTERNATIVE 4 t 10 400 \ ,•; �• -: i 1 i � i[V1310M3 ffif kilicfs 1 aEC ST FOR CITY COLML ACT! %oonitted by ..; n 1 n `P tment ' • ' Uaie Nrepated1 Ll L 10_ .. , 1979 Backup Material Attac ® YM 0 No Subject PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF ATLANTA hVENUE DETWE Etl D LI Whl a 5'r1aj.T hN1) �YY>•.Y LAKE STREET AND LAKE STRE CT BETWEEN M NGE AV ' W ' , ' . City Administrator's Comments Approve as t•rc•omtnended Statement of Issue, Remmmendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Mternative Actions: ST&JEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is Precise Man of Street Alignment No. 79-- Z, which is the alignment of At lan to Avenue, between Dulawaro Street and Lake Street and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and Walnut Avenue. it Ergt�tMl~N DA'I'I ON The Planninq Comviission is recommending that, the City Council ahpi t3ve Precise Plan of Street Al ignrmnnt No. 79- z . Alternative 10 and di. rcc-t the City Attorney' s Office to prepare an ordinance reflecting said alignment . &N&S 5IS Applicant : Initiated by City Council Location : Intersection of Lake Street and Atlanta Avenue Request : Establish the aliynr..ent of Atlanta Avenue, between Delaware Street. and Lake Street and Lake Street between Orange Avenue and ,Walnut r Avenue and their intersection. PLANNING t 1S I N ''A ION ON &eR l L 17 979 ON MOTION BY HIOGINS AND SECOND BY PAON" E. ' 111E COMMI SN'Ioll. Ri "(%OMhw)1m ,... [PRECISE PLAN OF STREET MaIGNMEN"► NO . 19-2 TO THE 'ITY COUNCIL FOR ' APO TION WITH ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT.' NO. 10 BEING THE RECOHMENDE D CON- 1►IOURATION IN CONCEPT ONLY BY 'PIE FOLLOWING VOTE: A1iES: Higgins, Russell , Finley, Cohen. Pavane ,. IDS: Tone. w�3RMT: Stern. tbaxil PNSA '19- Page Two Additional action taken at that meeting was the adoption of Resolution 1246; d�' 011 14OTZON BY PAONE AND SUCOND BY PAONE, RESOLUTION NO. 1246 A5 AMENDED TO REFLECT ALTERNATIVE NO. 10 AS A CONCEPTUAL ALIGN- Mf Sly' WAS ADOPTED 8y THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: I{iggins, Russell , Finely, Cohen, Paone NAES: None AAS} Nr: Stern, ©azil U SION: in 1970 , the City Council adopted Precise filar► of Street Alignment No. 70-4 , which is the alignment of Atlanta Avenue between Delaware .Street and Lake Street and Lake Street , between Orange Av.jnue and Walnut Avenue. This alignment as adopted, . has never been constructed and after numerous discussions, the City Council has recommended that tbit3 precise plan and ordinance be repealed and a new precise plan be *established for this alignment. At the !March 19, 1979 City Couticil meeting, the Council directed the Planning Comriniss4on to review alternative alignment designs and report back to the Council w4th its recommendation for a new precise plan for this intersection. On April 17. 1979 , the Planning Commission held a public heartnq on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79- 2 . At this meeting. the Commission reviewed ten alternatives and a variation of one of those alternatives . The ten alternatives reviewed were the sarTM: as those presented to the Planning Commission as part of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 78--4 . After reviewing all eleven of the alternatives, the Planning Commission selected Alter- native No. 10 to be presented to the City Council as the conceptual design for the Lake Street/Atlanta Avenue Alignment . Attached are both the staff reports from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78-4 dated August 1 , 1973 , and from Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79- 2 dated April 17, 1979. The original ten alternatives are discussed in detail in Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 78.-4 . while Alternative 4A is discussed in Precise Plan of Street Align- ment No. 79-2 . ENV 0&1E TAL STATUS : Precise Plar, of :street Alignment No. 79- 2 w.,:: as:;essed far erivirarmlont -A ) offects under Neqative Declaration No. 79-21). This negative coot.-tura- tion addressed all tent of the proposed alternatives . Negative: Durlara Lion No. 79-29 was posted for ttie prescribed lenc)th of timt: in t_hv Office of the City Clerk and the Iluntington Ueach Independent. No.. Comments were received by the Planning Department, i,--At?wr in writing or oral , during or after the posting period. e `h11iiA 79- '���IV 'I'Iftl�t2 r (IN -MOTION BY IIIIIEN ANI) IIY IlI(Wo W '19-.29 WAS AD )I'TEI) BY T1IE FOLLOWING VO'1H: AYES = Higgins , Russell , Finley , Cohen, Paone NOES I None: ABSENT: Stern, Bazil • �;yj(gt NG SdURC£r Not applicable. �LTIwRN T�,YE ACr'TZON The Council may consider any of the other alternatives that were submitted to the Planning Commission on April 17. 1979. Each of . the eleven alternatives are part of the attached staff reports and each has been analyzed for both advantages and disadvantayes. SUPPDXIING INEQBMATION: 1 . Area Map 2 . Planning Commission Staff Reports dated August 1 , 1978, April 17 , 1979 3 . Negative Declaration No. 79--29 Respectfully submitted, 1(amls Pali Secretaryzng JNP :SKB:gc r I 1 AN MH . � . 4, s I •� ..``` � ,� "�•••.•, .'/'_,,•., I' ~,•\i•J ��.. �_��_�: .�'.'�... /�•L�1.•.'A / 'tit ��. ,. ._ .. I` fib PROJECT 0 C � � GS -1 Ns•o -- i CS huntington Gooch planning de arlmdh' t •�� • \fit � - � _ • � r , • w !� _ . ,"._. . _1__era.yi.` ...i..�. _ .._.—.• __. - - __ _ — _ .f op 1 - f � n �f.�5101•S_ Ai�l�ZMCix --- - ; �>�lt•�� _ EXM CONDMON PRECISE PLAN OF STREET nYl1ri'N :EST i 8-a A T LANTA/:,A. { cp �� r ► 1 i Pi f i• PRECISE PlAirl OF ' STREET ALIGNMENT 77 - 3. ` ATL ANTA / LAKE A L T E R td A T- E i0 Nage, q6 Counc i , • Mi 4t( /7/19 II [ r10MiN15TmyIYC sI fAIcA`l111N C1TY Ili{ CMt'LAYMI: IRAINiMI; - ' I1Ci1 79-1!1 t L I i t b t � . 1.�1Gtti{lfiW• '_ ��.' ':fir; �+ (: :'i 1f:w �� •�' «3rfr�' / 's f1 TIw Clrr,l; Irr•+;�;t�nrl ��i a 4t Mi+rKniii,�i'tin i fri�ni tliirily AiluiiliIstr �ti.�I reco(v !nwliinl Rt1 � r os .� ► i .,lw«rn1. `r�! ,t�,,• y,ni itiijtn►i' ili��i+:h ;tn�iiiiyix�j'C AnlllfrTr�iiiiliMj'' A�leih'istrat`l is' a �r j rIVdL' ;, r1ni ` ; ufitl .lire e ..ci1olik` cut�`iui'atiun .T ii 'i�` 'd �' ';; � � ` y .. �' f. �Cca+nr�5 tls'iliii It r, r ,, i =i r �S Y ( . •rlt...h s y ' '1ar;, ,UK �._ pu M ,. !',' �� with.. , for C E T A ti of(jra►ns 7 n t.he. cit hack to the, Oren e.' Cuuht' iissio� thee'stipula�t;ion , that /al,) `such ngiiies be s�utharizE�dnrtua,4 �y, by tht Cltr. to the newly-=established cor,'ptiration for CETA 'program adnii'ni�stra'�Cion and operations directed to Huntington' Deach 're,idents. Counciliioman l3aile• '`a,ked i� �r �f ,� '� �•;: f y, i if'' other cities hfive 'implemcincedf this ,type of action an f question d the Ci ty's�;,f irianci'a l respo's1bi ji ty. , The:, N,a power Adni nistrator .'stated =j , that,an affirmative youte on this item:would ; indi -ate;,.'6 'iciI approval' in concept„f;: If.1 and that` staff would"prepare a contract that would spell out -costs and responsibilities of the proposed prexjram. Councilmen Mo�cAllfister logofired as ,tio whettjer ihis.` a6iion would redace the City's'� administration costs, and the Manliower AdUlinistretbr' stated it woulii ''reduce direct and indirect costs, one of which wou 1 d 'be a' reduc tic,n in liability insurance, r On motion bv. Da.i ley, second MacAllister, Council ce.ntinued ,ci)nsideration„r,of establ ish- ing the flontinatiin Deach,� Eniployment and rriiininj A416sitration as a'private', non& profit, tax-exempt corporation to the May ;% 1979 meeting by the following rote: AYES:, Pattinson, Mandic, MacAllister, Yt►der NOES:_.:; Thomas !; ABSTAIN: Bailey ABSENT: None I PUBLIC NEARING PPSA 19-2 - ALTERNATIV 8 APPROtIEO - ND 19-29 AD01) ED Mavor MscAl l�i'ster annodnced that -this.. bras the da ', and �'hour set io'r; a b1ic�'hearijri on Preci se Plan.. , g y P . of Street AIignrnent'No. 7,�-2 which is`- a proposal to precisely align Lake Street between Orange 'and Walnut. Avenue a,nd Atlanta Avenue be',tween Delaware ,... andlake 'Streets. Also for cons idei•6tion werr: ten different iilierndtives relating to this al igninent. The . planninngg Ctianis,*ion recommended Al ternative No, 10. Tki Council considered Negative Declaration No. 79-29 in connection with' the precise plan of street al'iynment. The Cit Clerk informed Counci l � that all legs y �l 1 ' requi rentents for, publication, notificaf�ion' and posting had been met and tNit she had received no cawwications or written protests to the matter. 1C The Acting Planning Director presented a veiwgraph depicting Alternative Nosy 10 4A and 4 . He presented an explanation of each alternative. Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open'. Mr. Jim Van Derliyden addressed Couticil and !�;tated that he supported the alternative; recommended by staff. Therebeing no one further resent to speak p p on the matter and there beingftfl0 further ' protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. { �i ;r Page 1 Cenci l Minutes - 5/71,79 ! r r i `01 ^.f ...:rf" 1. .;..;r ..•4.'�' t �,!. t ,r; `� , . . /.:. ,. ..11 > T* Diraatar of Pubic Works' spoke regarding `thel ramifications of Al ternati"e No. l0. � A'.RgtiQfl 'Ns'' Ml��t b i t If f r'n l T1�i'inot 1XI fa•iled!'b they fcillowi� �� votr: Mat.A lister to a�rovt �Alterativr'No. AA. . AYES NOES:,,, Tho�ias 'Nandic , Bt,ilej� . ABSTAIl;`,', Pa-ttinson ABSENT one A,jmoti oci was�'made, by,hlandic j seconded 6y Sai i ey 'to' approve Al te'rnative No, '6.' Fallowing discussion, the motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Mandic . NOES: 'f( Thomas',; .MacAllister, Bailey , Yoder `ABSTAIN: - Pattinson ABSENT': None 1 J A:`motion' was madet, by Mandic,rseconded by MacAllister, to approve Alternative 08. ' The ration carried by the fol lowing vote: AYES:, Mandi&j.1 MacAllister, Bailey t NOE,;,; :° Thanas;�: Yoder ABS`'AIN': Pattins'on ABS:NT: None 41 �. .. Ontmoti�o i_b Baile second Thomas ed N ative 'Declaratio Y� , Covn�il adopt eg . . . n Na. :79�29, : III' p ,, " '., �• d� precise ' , If- . . 'l�grment.No. J'9-2 - Ai terna,tive Rio, 8,, and oirettdd i a prove ��Plan .of�- Street -A tNii City' Attorney to prepare an ordinan e 'reflecting said alignment. Motion carried uiianimously, with Councilman Pattinson abstaining from the vote, FPSA''.70-4 REVOCATION, ' ORD NO' 2360 - INTRODUCED Iher City Cierk "presented a` coirmunicationt from t>;e Planning 0epartmentr relative , to ordinance No. , .1633 whichcwould revae Precise P1•an of Street Alignment` No. � ]0�4 the.'al ignment of ( 1 ) Atlanta "Avenue,; from 1265','_west of, Beach Boulevard to' Lake Street (2) Lake `5treet, beaween OrAnge Avenue and Pacific Co ast` Highway, and (3) ';'010i Avenue b6twe en Lake' S tree t' to 135' west. of 2nd `S tree't, On March ,19 1919 a public heariliq ;was` held 'on ,this"-me tter w� th :dOcfsion continued to consider in - conjunction with Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79=2. The'`Clerk kas-►,directed to . read, Ord inance!'No.' 2360 by title - "AN' ORDINANCE OF 'THE CITY OF -HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING 7HE '`HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODC. BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 16339 AN AMENDMENT TO DISTRICT MAP 16. " On motion by Bailey, second M.andic , Council approved introduction of Ordinance No. 2360 by,,; the following vote : AYES: Ma»dic, MrcAllister, Bailer, Yoder NOES: Thomas ABSTAIN: Pattinson ' ABSENT: 'Nor►e 1� . RESOLUTIorj� No . tt`���-' .'+�f !�:Y?'{jri, , +!,�krrry-£r r.t .. i..�rl.# ,+e ':hn'{ st•4'y,.1 L}#' .� ,•,i'- A., RESOLUTION OP,`.,THE CITY +,COUNCIL;°�,OO,�tHEI GITX 0F1"11iUNTIN0!v3 ,BEACH •ADOPTZNO ;;PE CIS LAN-OP STREET" ALIANMENT NOS-. ;` T9-�2 ;IILTERNAT=VE ,TKO ..;,.� 11 6 ,,THE ALIOIXENT OF,°LAKE ST EET; BETWEEN ORANOE AVENUE AND WALNUT AVENUE AND ATLANTA AVENUE BETWEEN DELAWARE STREET AND LAKE STREET WHEREAS pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law', air ES � P t i~ cularl California Dovernme y n t Code Section 655001 the-=P.1anni'ng CommAssion of the City of Huntington , Beach;,"-af@i tr notice duly given , held a public hearing on April 37 , 1979', to align pre- ci3ely Lake Street between Orange Avenue, and Walnu+ ` Avenue and Atlanta Avenue between Delaware Street and IAke Street; and On May 7 , 1979 , after notice duly given , hearing waa held before this Counel1, and the matter having been considered , the Council finds that said Precise Plan 79 2 in reasonably ably neces- sary to the orderly and efficient flew of traffi'::, for the pre- ' servation of the he alth th and ear ety .oT the i nhabi tatite pit the city , and for the orderly development of the community' NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council) or the City of Hunt ini,ton Beach that the real property,,, ro pe arty, shown `'on ' the map marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto, incorporated herein and by reference made a part hereof , is hereby designated and adopted as Precise Plan No . 79-2 of the City of Huntington Beach and more particularly described as follows : That portion ar Sectirana ]1 and 1'4 , ,Towns+hip, 6 South , Range 11 West,, .. In thus . Rancho Las � Rolaasl C ty of Hun'tin ton Reach 'Count ' `of Orange , State:' or Call-y rornia as sho wn or� :a map recorded in Acok °51 �­ Pdge 13 of Min cellane' ous flaps in the orrice of the ; County Recorder of said County described as follows: JG c be i2/12/79 lla�;i��rri�i�; rit;, �l��, tnt;��rt►t��.1: f ���� nt L}fit. �r ��r�artir:r oectioi� line :ref naiil ,iecGlion 11, hrtvl�ir. n. ve�.'�i2� .n. showntr�n�n�mAthorrraonrlinq -'�f..Atl�intA i, hoa r6 aC n 1. A n1 h1 h h h3v t ` n;;tkf 1 r '�' .t n t Ma ran ru;,-drodP.iI n monk ,�I. �friKe, .5' t 1' MI pe,gI IAne".nOn Mripa �, in the, nf.Ploe'�'of ti�c�county 110' carder; thf, �iuc east along eaid,raent,e r3 ine 205�.'25r feet to,� the4 true; point: g_ . . oi` .Atlantet ,tie'.". 'it /the'.`BouC�ierly p pf` be inning said oin Bing she intersection . of n � , ' � 1 Street , a 6ro-ae to rlxne,� longation of. they eeat ins' oT " h berna► Ry 0944 Coat wide atree'*'t aB 'r honn o�i,'said map; of 'Vista ;bel Mar Tract,'''-a i`d' east line al`ao"' being the rest line oi' ©lock 102 of . said Va,sta ; Del,,,Mar Tract; thenor along said line north 79 .91 'feet ; thence south 89 °59'32" wes t,.60 .01 Feet to a hontangent curve concave,;_to' the. was te nort 'wes't Nevi,ng a radius of 32 .QQ;. feet;. thence south- . rl s teriy and northwesterly along said curve the6u8 h a 'central angle oof' 112°02,',09" , an arc,,distance of `.62.57 Piet to a point on a ,,compound curve concave to ttie nUr�theast having a radius ` of 277 .32 feet', a radial to Sa 'point,, bears south 22 O1 t11 ,. west;' thence continuing along said compound curve through:•a central angle of 55 07 17 , an arc distance of 265'.84 feet to a .reverse curve'' concave to ;the south- t hav,= 1;ng,.F4 radius, of 377 .32 feet ; a radial bearing ` to said we thenceoint of rdierae Curvature bears northwesterly., along sa1&,'urvehthrough a..centr ,. g t ra 2 g ag of 179,•75 feet to , a _ r�:verse�curve7conce�n are distance.,,. ,, , o r n . ve to the northeast . having 8 .radlu' s or 32. 00 feet, 8 radial to . said point bears north '49 51' 47" east; thence northwesterly aloe said curve `{ through a cntral. angle. of 40°08 ' 13" , an-. arc d1a tence of 22 . 42 re et to a ;point on the east l ins'• o'f Lake' =' S tree t , shown as Rail road Avg ,;U"e, ,,90 feet ` i n width , shown on a map, of Huntington ®each', recorded 1n ,Boo{c 3 Page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in -the orflee of the County Recorder or said Courity ; thence west 45 .00 -feet -to the f, centerline of said Lake Street; thence south along said rig centerline 1376'50 feet ; thence west 45'' feet .to a point on the went line or, said Lake Street , aaid ,point being the most northerly corner of mock No. 301 as ,r shown. on said mentioned map of Huntington Beach;:,,thence along ' said " eat line ,aouth .378 .25 feet to an angle polnt ; v said.; ngle . point', being Snl eraection of the southerly extension' of said, Kea t line .and the northeasterly=. ex- tension of the southeasterly, line of Block No. .261 :as shown on -aaid- map of Huntington : Beach ; said.-southeasterly Ifhe also being the northwesterly line of Lake Street , shown as First Street on said map of Huntington Beach; hence South, 4102112nPeet alon said 'south.. Meat 9�1 .34 east line and its extension ; thence south 4148 ',48" east 100 .00 feet to a point, on a nontangent curvy , concave 2 . northwea tort haVI' a radius of, �tQ.0o fe` ; ,, y ' 35 - eG; a ira il�;; hea rin .., o,' all d • poi b' 'g , , nt esra :` north !18.°3A '48" Meet -`,'theno'e nort��enc� tiec]y along aaid;,curve through. a central angle Warc":distant of 2. Pass to` everaa cu e , 240 t:' K r r e conora e �to,• the ,�outheeet Navin a.� radius ..6!'1�3�. rf feet= hence 'nor,theaaterw1 � alon eaic! •reverse . curwe Y. , Chrough,8 central angla of : 50.p3 09" an :arc: distence~or 8 2fi i'eet• ,;tt�enae north�=,50°25!,5A" na� t> 3K feet too -a curve --°toncave;,to 'the aouth having, a 1re`d ue`;c£'S;32 00 fQet ; ttencenortheaaterly, etaterly#'and ,goutheae�te�ly along aaid curve throu, h a central angle of . 81°34 '15";;• an ;arc . distance 'oP y5 5 feet to a reverde curve eonaave.,.to ;the nor thias t having a "radius of 377. 32 feet; thence ,,south- easterly and eaa to rly along,: paid reverie , curve thtwough' a central angle of 44 °11155 " an arc, diatance of 291 47 feet; thence north 70 . 00 feet to the true point of beginning. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Hunt- ington Reach at a regular meeting; thereof held on the 17th day of December , 19T9 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CM MIWFR M ty A t or ey REVIKWKD AND APPROVED: I NITIATM) AND A PPROWD: ty fm I n i s t ra t or Development Bemices Director 3 . 10 • A _ .0 rv. /y N t LAKE STREET if OU �•��' Q wa.►rt=+Mrr .� . ... ....-. i 1. &a**/ At4L i .- .. •r: P...•per • i was s.r�� •.r ..-smr- ra Awl 'nor . • r �.:. ALABAMA tr:; STREET ��11 N0M1� OWCf M PLAN�lrt�tMclS I ANPSAM�NNr •-` .�.►:-- ... ATL'ilMfi�=?�Yf�a.,�QR.f��E�'.�IYf' .�;"._ ;. �. • t:illlrrt'Y o�;'o�ANC� 3 rr s CITY or Mtllf l l Mf ON SRACI! 4 I, ALICIA M. fi$llWON'1'K, the duty •iretfd, qualif sod City Clerk of the Clty of Hunt'64ton leach`, and ex-of ftcio Clark of the Cit Council of •rld City, do hereby certify that the whole number of "vmbo rr of the ctif Council of the City of Huntington beach is. soten; that the foregoing resolution was `passed and adopterd by the affitrmtive vote of more than a majority of all the i mob ire of said Ccty Council at a regular posting thereof held on the day of , 19 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: NOES: Councilmen: +_ ASSENT: Covnc i la*n: City Clerk and ex-officto, Clark of the City Council of the City of Huntington leach, California