Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrecise Plan of Street Alignment 79-3 - Lake St between Indi 0010 /97! Superior Court ',�.,� ti`I'ATN OF CALIFORNIA In and Air the County ftf Orant;r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 9 CITY CLERK Public Nearing T9-3 State it(California Cottntk of Orange. 1 Rita J. Richter That I am and at all tint"herein rnenti.mrd Ma%a riiirrn if �t the United atatr!l,I+%rr the agr f4 t%entv•unr }cars.and that f art) n.+t a ithrty ttt. nrlr irarrr4ted in the, alxr%r enhllr({ m�ttrr; that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the TV NuntirW-ton Beach Independent Review . AN a nexwpaj»r ftf�rnrrai rirt•tllaU,Itt,puhli%hrff in the City flf stlwtfi "all Huntington Beach County (+t 01010 f+nd uhi(h nrw.j,.AfWf t. pultllahtd }trt lire ltsl 1 i!«�2; •r diiemir. ti=,n tIf h•rat r.�ww anll Intrllt,rnfr } a jrn.ral r'h Trit' tli 44 i11�ter, and Shift) ttl � m!1 tlM luf.ln trlrtltl„hHi h�+d ,} }, LtLt and mill Fta,a lrtn3 ride rtllr+.•-rlptNUl 110 1.1 pl,Ytng *ulhK'rilwi.. !r , * and which nra•illia1wr hAA IN rn jttint+•ti and ;rl,l+ Whed at rrrulaf interVA14 in the .aid Cf.01niv of Or.1Rj'( flit a i*ritnf rat"r•rtftng, 41nr Near: that the tl'+tttt'. ,I r}tittt, <t.f ant(rSKI i■ a printed ("pr• flit% ►W..'n trtttillitit l Its th+• rrXulaf stiff rntire i►ottr 14#altf n�Mll+ ;+ter, atit} tS,st Ill A+I-o 61i;f;rtrl`,rlll theme<f, its the f141"alnr datr•� (I,%lit June 211 1974 I friirlti i,l•rl,,lArrt cr il 1N.. 4j!% ..t t.4 Inn iw t. lr;tn.l tr%!fret Garden Grove t� Irfnrt;ia,t}.t. 21,r„ti;+Itt l,} .June 79,. of ., (' "i a. may!� �' �r .+f•w .�. t R IL `A�C`CION ` Jamea. W. Pal.in Development 5eriicPs/Plarininq {° s S�ibmhted by Dp�rtment ;...:..r.:. l Dste Pr ` uly.. 30 red : J z \ , 19 79 , Backup Material attached © Y Mo r , PRECISE PLAN OC STREET ALIGWENT -79 3 Subject f City Administrator's Comments Y A-PP OV&D BY CITY (:UUI`G11. 7 Approve �as recommen i9 CITY CLR K 1 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source-, Alternative Actions: III Q Attached for your consideration is the ordinance on Precise Plan of ea _ 1 i Str..et» Alignment No. 79 3. A public hearing has been held on this Precise Plan by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 was heard try the Planning Commission ! `= on. June 5, 1979 and the City Council on July 2, 15,79. The adoption of this ordinance will Precisely alien Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Indianapolis Avenue as a 90 foot right-of-way. Lake Street is presently designated on the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a Primary txterial having an ultimate right-of-way of 100 feet . RECOMMENDAT rorJ: The Planning Cormi,-iasion and Planning Staff rec�om,rtc.�nd that th,� City coon^.il adopt the attached Ordinance for Prec ine Plan of Street Aligriment No. 79-3 . Respectfully, a �T es 11. all n, Director Development Services Attachments : Ordinance 1, { � " I j` I�E�IE_�ST'l:Cfg* CITY !L Submitted by James',W.,:Paliri Cfepartment Development ',Services/Plnni"ng f y�x Bata Prepared June �2 , 1979 Backup,Material Attached a Yes s t - , } `Subject •PRECISE PLAN OF'�:STREFT ALIGNMENT.M.` 79--3- A precise street alignment for Lake Street+ between Zndianapalis r 1 Avenues, and ''Yorktown Avenue. s J; City Administrator's Comments ire t Approve as recommended.. I Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: /} STATEMENT OF ISSUE: .+%{l Transmitted for consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3, a precise plan of street alignment establishing a ninety (90) foot right-of-way for Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue. The rights-of-way along this portion of Lake 1 right-of-way f-w• Street at the present time is depicted as a 100-foot right o of per the Circulation Element of the City ' s General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment Na. 79-3 and direct the City4 Attorney to prepare an ordinance reflecting the 90 foot right-of-way . ANALYST-5: ApplIeant : InItlatrt:d by the Department of Uevelopnient Services Location: Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue? and .�. ... Yorktown Avvnuo Ftc� uc#;t Jish the ultizate right-of-way of tho above-mentionedportion of Fake :'trei:rt: as a 90-foot right--of--way very*us a 100-foot rig}1t-of-wl-1y depicted3 on the Circulation E.Ie- ment of the City 45 Gencrill PI 4.an. . INNING 'COMMISS7{1k4 ACTION 014 .IUrdf, 5 , 1 i79 : t td MOTION BY FAOt1E AND yECf.�r4D BY RUS SELL PR�:CISI: PI.u1r4 OF STREI:.'I r'�I,I4+N- t 11ENT NO. .19-3 WAS APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH F F z FXIIIEIIT D-2 AS THE REC�3.IMENDED STRr:.taT SECT[Ord, BY THE Foz.L014ING VOTE: Higgins , . Russell , Baxi 1 r Paone NOES 5tc:rz�. Cohen Mkpyys ,; AI3S :N'IiST : s..s.. � June 22, `1979 d a Page 2 ..,.'.!'DISCUSSION: Lake-Street has been the subject of. a long history of controversy. gY In.'the attached staff re ort a chronolo has been included w:ach P will: outline .a number of , significant events relating to LAke 'Street. since" 1975. In 1977 a tentative. tract was approved along the east . f. side .of Lake Street north of Adams Avenue. This tentative tract has not been': Able to record a final map because of the undecided ultimate ' right-of-way width for Lake Street. In the past several ; months, two additional tracts have been submitted to the Planning Depart en processing before the Planning Commission that front oirto Lake Street. It was essential that a decision be made on the ultimate right-of-way x on Lake Street prior to the development of any of the properties located along Lake Street. Based on a recommendation from the Department of Public Works , the Planning Department pursued a precise : plan of street alignment for that portion of Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and 7orktown Avenue. I, At the Planning Commission hearing held on June 5, 1979 , a number of persons addressed the Commission in favor of the proposed 90-foot right-of-way along bake Street. The speakers all emphasized the im- portance of maintaining the integrity of the residential neighborhood as it exists without encouraging or channeling beach and commercial traffic through the general area. `.' The existing eucalyptus trees along the east side of Lake Street was a major issues of concern to the Planning Commission relating to Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 . The landscape division of the Department of Public Works submitted ted a survey conducted on the trees and their present location in relationship to the elevations of the street at finished grade . The survey concluded that Within that p ort.� on o£ Lake Street between Indianapolis ali � zn dYor Yorktown i t would be necessary to rertiove 22 of the existing trcus; however , there Is a possibility of having approximately 18 of the existing trees. F3oth Contni.ssi.oner Stern and Commissioner Cohen requested that they decision on Lake St+revt be tabled until the Traffic MQdCl that Is presently being conducted fol the City ident.ifii'i� future traffic ►oleu es glance Lake SLrLteat. The r-em. ain.ing members of the Planning Com- mir mission rayrc�e^d that adc�rFuaate information and studies have been developed along Like, Stre.�c•t. and that any de.,c�:i si on n, le reg��r ciirig tteis str+"et would not. be prer,. rt:,ire , TheCO2'.,^,tii:�2iiotl requested that Planningx staff pursue parr a�tWit�:ional precise plan of . street alignment for that i�c=rtirrn of Lake Street b4't�i x'Sl I(rdi.an�i lc�li a 1'lvenuo outh to either Atlanta Avenue or 11aciflc ! Coast Highway. F14VIRQt3MI'rNTAL :STATUS: The esrvironment�ri effects of this p:.c'ric:et are addressed as part of I� the Environmental. rew•iLW of Negative D*�—Cl zration No. 79--34 fo: Tentative Tract 10719 . zz i t a f t P:P.SA. 79 ; 3 rx' June 22,. ­1979 >C t Page- 3 , FUNDING 'SOURCF, Not, applicable. + ALTERNATIVEiACTION i City Council may consider any of the . other alternative street widths: as` submitted to the Planning Commission on� June .5, 1979.,, These alternatives;-range in ultimate right-of' say from 90 feet' as selected by. the, Planning Commission as Exhibit D-2 to 100 and 105 foot rights-of-way. If any of the other alternatives would be " selected by the City Council, Precise Plan of Street hlignment No. 79-3 would have, to be referred back to the Planning Commission with, a recommendation from the Council, .nr.r..ww[1}'SDK.R7!��.a..`.....r�rr+rx.r.+s.�w.wo^'9r+^.-�iT.ue'R..eaves,+w^+.:..rv!.....a....s+.,, w+.,,..t•.y,+-...vvrnw.w,.. - w....«i..v�vr...er..«.•.-w►sn..+.r.Msr..ra.w,..w«+'.r*r.w..t�pt-y l An alternative course of action relating to the approval of . this . ;x recommendation 'is to hold back on the preparation of an ordinance } for this portion of Lake Street and have one ordinance prepared after hearing the remaining portion of Lake Street (Precise Plan of. Street Alignment No. 79-4 , scheduled for Planning Commission hearing on Duly 3, 1979) . SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1. Area Map 2. Planning Commission staff report dated June 5, 1979 Respectfully submitted, �e_ James W. Palin Acting Planning Director JWP:SMn: d r L a J7�lY�'M'i 5 0l. l-♦ u...'.... r. i i.S.l, .:. .Y. _ . _. - .... l .. .. .sJl.. ' .'r S'. �1, • r r i f 4y r%3 1 r :P0 4 TO: '' Planning Commission ` FROM:, Development Services/Planning DATE: .June 5 , 1979 SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF S'iREET ALIGNMENT 1I0. 79-3 (LAKE STREET) .:SUGGESTED ACTION: ire 1. open the public hearing and accept testimony from, those property, owners notified who wish to speak in regard to . Precise - Plan of. Street Alignment No. 79-3 . 2. Continue the public hearing open to allow staff to readvertise to incorporate Lake Streetfrom Indianapolis Av Avenue South to Atlanta Avenue into this precise plan. 3. Instruct staff to set and readvertise S-hc new hearing after the Traffic Model has been comolet:ed and is in workable form to permit analysis of the dispersion of traffic within this area of the City. 2. 0 GE14ERAL INFOPIWIOM: Precise plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 was set for public hearing to reduce the ultimate width of Lake Street from the 100 feet currently existing on the Circulation Eler, ent. to a 90-foot sectior to be developed within the existing rights-of-way from Yorktown to Atlanta Avenue. This action was pursuant to a mernorandum dated March 27 , 1979 , from the Director of Public Works, However, since that date the Department of Public Works has indicated that this reduction would he premature and that anticipated traffic counts for ultimate development: would require a greater width on Lake Street. The Director of Public Works , the Traffic t.nq i noe r , and reprenenta- tives from the Fir-, .and i'lanning (7i;,p artmenCs ha%,e not: to discuss alternative sections drafted for the ultimate constructed width of Lake Street. Based ur-)on the JHK traffic :study isrovIously submitted, it was a con (nisus t:h aL a reduction of Lake Street at this Umo would .i nieed be pri trature, oven though the nurtlIcrz'17 portion of Lake between Yorktown and Garfield Avenue:, has been deleted from the Circulation Element and the City Council is connidering the design and realignment. of the intersection of L+ak.o and T,tlanta - Trhe dis- ; cuss�ion pointed out. the nef!d for par?:inch on both nides� of Lake Street as well as for a 5-;foot bike lane and a median left turn packet at ail cross street: inte;r:.sect.ion:a . With t}sic design, and with preserva- tion of the .1.5--foot parkway can the we r:t sidrr of Lake: , tiorth-south e y �T;. wyWYMM.�.F.�A.•�w1P * yr P:Y :S' A :79w3 . t, June''S, 19'�G 4 , . .• Pagei r traffic wauid be limited'--to .a. single traffic lane. in; each Aireetion_ ,. The trees: were .also . a part of the .discussion 'and we were . informed bf . t Mr. xambory that , his street tree superintendent is putting together :{ a display on all. trees along the east side of Lake to show crown . j el'evation:•and health condition in order. to assess which i.•re'es can be 'saved: In summary, the discussion led the staff to a consensus that the 15, 000. to 16 ;000 . cars per day ultimately expected on Lake, . the parking for the residential uses on both sides of the street, and . ;. the bicycle lanes on cacti side could not be accommodated in the 90-foot right-of-way as advertised and that the existing 100 feet of. right-cif-way could also be deficient, and that more updated informa— tion y tion would be necessary for a final, determination on street width. There-, ', fore, the departments agreed that the Traffic tdodel is necessary and alternative intensities of land use in the downtown area must be analyzed to provide ultimate counts on which to base a determination of, the width of Lake Street:. Wher. Lane Street was previously before the Planning Commission for possible widening to 100+ foot width, it was anticipated that. in the � .' at ' such alignment would be offset substation t: �i h vicinity�.t of the Edison u an � c n . 9 Y westerly with a modified section to accommodate flow at that location. However , it should be noted at this time , regardless of whether the � ultimate decision is for retaining the existing 90«toot right-of-way , or pursuing the 100-foot sas shown on the Circulation Element: , no modification is being proposed posed to any properties along the westerly side of the Lake alignment , either to the existing right-of--way line or to the existing parkway width, which is currently 15 feet . Since the prier review and determination on the width of Lake btreet , the Department of Public Works has drafted a number of alternative suc- tions to accommodate a singlo t.r. avel lane in cacti direction within tihY• 90-foot , as well, as t:wo travel lanes in rich direction within both the 90-foot: and the loo-foot: width au shown on the Circulation F.lem+�►rit. The twca tr. ttvr�l 1=;tie in e�ic'� tlirecttcaci UP n ttie exirtinci 90-root: width would t-liriiriiite the 13r.11-kirit.t Which if: customary Ott curb for residential C�{'VCyYC)f:�-merit: . AS thf, Pt"01) arty ot,-,n't'iS tU ttl(:' :�'('`it. (�� i,ak�► iitiCC!t t1i1Vt' hadtt11f3 U.:t! f'c)r y'C;7r:. and �!Xist ,inq appz0vt'd matt, on the east , as well i7!i thoso pvriilinq 4Yppro. A 7.]y tho Planning Corn- mirr:riart , art, :�t~rs+E7d by ;111(-y ��c't't�t�;a :�r.jy , narking ��'�:)ltltl t�c� very► C1C51z'tyh1C!, i. f nott?'�C"� jUtf'1 't liK'(.:.t.!!+!:.iI"}` , foritilt'h i (�n.ident.ial devel(; p- ment . For this rt'asoll , tilt., s:ti-Iff is i'e or'U:'iendir)tI that tho t'1Linninq Commission tic:t pursue a reduction lessthar: the 100-root required L;' the Circulation Eleriont. . 2. ��istCtr ' : Attached is r1lot:t roct,,nt staff report, dated June 22 , 1978 wTi�.c c�r�nt:gins chrvriUlo�t.ic�:tl li .:t cif t�v��nt,; leadiri(; up to this s trlC! t.lrit , ;jr 's: A 1 i,�s i1ddi..t:ic al infoi'rn,iti.on on t±he bake 5tr('et iiliC�n- ;,';' ment- . p° i ua 1 � s 4 kfFd.y;(�a a;d ,,� t #I r'f f4:; �t1 ; t ` 1• ° s ,t ti rrSaA t.7� �i ,i7une 5 r19.7g �� On 'June-•22 ;,,197�, the' Coma►`i.nsiori ;estabished a priority` list..,for a ,'- t; number `6f' street alterations for ttic downtown .anil''civic' cen er',,areas, :{ r to:.resolve,;the :circulation, '6nd' to establish,.,new alignmcnts-,f6r:':.this i;r' ' area of. the city: Action ,on.,that priority list; follows ' 1. ; First Priority • Revcication of PPSA70-4 (the 'Atlant3/'Lake intersection) . .has• been acted on try the City'. council . ,; : Second item ion this ::first priority was the..revocatxon of the Delaware Street. extension (PPSA. 70--2)r also acted 'on by 'the ;City; Council. 2 . Second Priority z Gothard Street realignment from 'F.11is 'Avenue ` to Yor town Avenue , (I)PSA 76-6C) . This was recently acted on by the Planning' Commission as Precise Plan of -Street Alignment Np: �l 79-1. which is currently awating a legal description from the Department of Public Works for transmittal to the City -Council . 3. Third Priorit Lake Street Extension (PPSA 76-GA) . This was ieleted by City Council action in 1979 by Circulation Amendment No. 79-1B. Another portion of this third priority, abandonment of ?lain Street between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6D) is no lon3er valid. 4 . Fourth Priority: The closure of Mainat 17th Street (PPSA '76-6) is currently in stud;r. Closure of 17th at Utica and Yorktown between Delaware and Clay (PPSA 76-1A and B) are currently under Public storks study. As can tie seen by this pr. iorit ' list, mtany of those pr oritics- cstab- lished by the Planning Commission to resolve the circa :,Iti-on have been accomplished , with few decisions remaining . However, we have retched a very critical point in the overall circulation for this area of the City and we cannot: emphasize c iiouyh the need for the Traffic Model as a tool for traffic anal}'z,.i, . 3.0 I'Iiyxlt0M4Il'1,I;T L STATUS: The ce7vir.or.rn���nt•�l *i`ft�rt ;; of tt� i .; 1?rc jr�ci ,ir�� ��c.iclrr.:.=.sr,ci a Iaart of the environmental review of t3ca �dEA=.tit: iv Lac ��e �el;�ri icari . 79-34 for Tentative-, Tract .10719. 4 r C I'r-X 0 IME!3 DAT,I ON: Based C)Il t;llc' �11)`3V4' 1Tl G1I'I':t.5}. l��tS ili1C1 !.tlt:' l.njotmat icri in the at.t ilr::11C(I staff report , 2t is the C'otlr:E.'Jlsi :i of the .:taf. ,f 010t: this pI'CeiL;e plt`ln of street t'111qflitioT?t be r'0Ilt llltiC`il (lrltc- fc),I. 1raw Iiq sula,,ili t:tal Lo the City of a Traffic. Model. to al la'•.:v the disl�c-r:110I1 Of tzaffic: ' within this area of the City . vie eonti.nuat.i;:)n will alto allcaw the nt��f tt) r+cacl:►ertine a now pkil)lic hi..•ariTicl for #h{ to (r401 of � Lake Street , as llr'E:`ci c III-in of Stre t.: 101gri'me 3t. No . 79-3 wits i.tlad- ` vertent.ly advertised to reduce orily tho section kaC'#'1roun Indianapolis and Yorktown when it) .fact th-; i-rIA(ItI . e.rlt should, have been not; prom ' Atlanta to Yorktown. � say y f t� i�y'L'�klyw.^hx,ws.y a,.e..\Y<,,.,.a,'�r.a .,...i.. 4-..,.'+•.s +° ..._ .. .' . '.;.. — y y ... _ t .:d �1 ' ;�5�,21k, •t • vS A t �9 ,1 �. t - + , tjy ;P•, { ft.•Y pBQe ,M rr • r. t I+` + rr.` t t 't�f t'd4ii: ark; 1 5 9 5 - t- ' tX,;,•, i xa 1 .3 •., • 1s IT1 4 : 1 �Albirna►tive, Action °4°: W l e i t h ct 1 h d nx c.l l w. re uir t at d' .v 3o m t Zable�. act on : in f y, ou d q e , h . all � e pen on . the east side ,`of:'Lake:"StreetdeaYca�,e Property `pit a ,55-font V, a offset :centerline to .acc.oriunodate the 100 foot, primary tvidth as °a , designated on 'the Circulati0n''Ele'6:ht . s a r . AT ',1CIIMENTS l : Exhibits: A, C, - DI j D2, D3 .2. Staff `Report dated June 22, 1978 ry `3. Excerpt from planning Commission Minutes , June 220 1978 t . • + JWP f . t ' ,. 1 iS it• I; t r. It I� i , a i lT{�e •�j5 r 2,: it•{lff �,� 4 f i:� 45` M55, , 30 t �.►;,t'.'' PARKVr'`EWiE TF2fiiEi.' TflA L f.K�IAN (REVEL IRAWX IIIEI��-���-'E ' 141 a •. LAVE ' LVC LANE. Ll t E LEFT W oC LANE �r�r(E LANE N TJRH UI i r rl. •'yam,,,,..:.»- '�.Ji( �5•_ ' -5�+. Iti - EXHIBIT '.'.te"" {5. _._i.... 30, S? «... ... Ir cr ' •��• ' f3S'J -_ft'KF�hA'I'EL 1ii .-IL Et l—r rr3 Fll�iE;J.ANE L..r r� 1F :Er' I LANE LANEL:JrE'Irx� r� r ` I i TIN L►1 ILANE ` Q LAN LIZ t r EX lE3IT G _ ....... LAKE STREET l. i�. }f `r, i` � �- r • 1 It x � f' L cc 0 cc �1 PARK' EIKE 7RAYEL TAA El TRAVEL Ti3AVEL Ell$KE t;" . !j W Mr. L1lhE LANE LAME: Dille L.Ar ••+• r' L.ANc g •r• _ W ems• 't, . .,. .r+• �� , .. - -t., A F �.� .' EXHIBIT Q r, r 15 30 FARK- 81KE Tt7AYEL R1!► TED MAVEL BiKE niR,K- N� tNG LtWE L ANE •AEDIAN LAKE LgiE I N G f �►- ' LANE L.EgT LA.•X •ti s }' TUti t LA :E W 60 V:• EXHIBIT D2 90• 45, 4 tt, 10 l E 7U,ZrIL 1Hi.Vil `•.'.;,•{i!,}.— T.- ,T:t.1:fi.rf�►( �(I L E t.+E.t)i:rt ;L:'3E ,( 1.40.1 +LErY �1 tole MoNow � ; tta..f. ii•1 EXHIBIT B 3 ram► LAKE STREET f�i t t J i 9ff TO: Planning ..Comraissko'n s , :FROM: Planning Department •:': ;a: DXTE:' June `221 1978 { SUBJECT; . PHASING OF PRECISE PLAIDS OF STREET ALIGNMENT ;(LAKE "STREET.) r r .1. 0 ' SUGGESTED ACTION: 1. .Reaffirm policy direction Established by the current Circulation . Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways 26 Establish a prioritization 'of, Precise Plans of Street Alignrrent. ta ' implement the Circulation Plan. 3. Adopt a tentative time schedule for consideration of individual precise plans. 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This report is intended to . provide an overview of several Precise Plans of Street Alignment that have .been proposed in order 'to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan. These include seVeral inter- ;related, proposals centered in the Downtown/Civic Center area, which have- -. been the subject of considerable discussion by the Planning Commission over the past several years. The following are the major Precise Plans i.nvolved ' (see location map) : . 1. The northerly extension of Lake Street, from Yorktown Avenue to 'Garfield Avenue (PPSA 76-6A) , 2. The widening of Lake Street from Pacific 'Coast Highway to 'Yorktown Avenue (PPSA 76--6B) , 3. The realignment of Goth'ard Street from Ellis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue using the existing right-of-way of; Crystal Street and Main Street (PPSA 76-6C) , 4 . The vacation of Main Street between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6DY so. The closure of Main Street at. Seventeenth Street (PPSA ' 76-6D) , . 6 . The closure of Seventeenth 'at Utica and at Yorktown (PPSA 76-w1B) , 7. The vacation of Seventeenth Street `between .Delaware and Clay , (PPSA 76�-IA ; 6. Thy; realignment of Atlanta Avenue and .Lalte Street at their inter- section, including the alignment of Atlanta between . Lake bnd Beach Boulevard (PPSA 70--4, PPSA 77-3) . Alkh .. . -. - ,. --_.__........w..rer►.erfr•tartnYlRilf- - a ' '•-� t 7�A j; 'j . , %} ,1 Ir a is a t! '.. i' .. Y a •t nC •.,1: 6 `} a {. • V - t ..r. ,,a, c•',.�s 9.. The >souther. l}► extension of 'belaware 5 tree t"between.-Frankfort A �AvenciQ 'ainrd pacific Coast Highway, (PPSA '70-Z, and ''0--3) ,1a Because of des�elopment pressure in.,`. tome tof :: the `areas affected ' by these ' " "� a1'ignmenta, Y xt 'i9 .",nece3sary, in the near- future.'to 'prioritize the 'Precise' E S . r r P1an`s and: establ 9h` a :tentative ached Ad ,for, their .consideration `by the t +,�' .t' ;R, Planning�.Commi�s;si:on. l;.'The information cohtained herein should . provide a °start"inch, point.:far` ,these l tasks. SU44MARY •OF ISSUES: a Since this -report is :intended to provide an ovhrall perspective 'on a 'large �. t: 'number :`of proposals , the 'discussion 'of issues 'is ?imite'd basically" to ; the following: (l). The objective or `purpose behind the proposal , primarily; froma traffic and circulation standpoint, (2) Thy interxPla+�fonships of the proposals with.;each other, and `the appropriate phasing of Individual Precise Plans. Among. the' other •issues,',mentioned briefly. in. regard to some of . e proposals 'are th6 impact' of current 'development ,activity, con"un th ity. 'response, need for relocation . .and the cost of the project. These will be'.-,brtaught out ,in considerably 'more detail when the Conunission begins consideration of the i individual plans . 4. g ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS An environmertal . im act report (EIR 76- 5) was prepared in October.. 197t6 covering Precise Plans of Street Alignment Ro. 76--6 A through E. This,,report was adopted on December 6 , '1976 with the sections 'pertaining . ' ' to the widening of Lake Street (PPSA 76-68) deleted. It is, fele;, that additional environmental documentation will be necessary regarding several 'of the Precise Plans discussed in ,this report. , p; ANALYSIS : option,'of. Precise Plans of 'Stree�. .Ali' nment `_is rovided for undez .State , . 9 . P. Planning . Law 'in ender , to carry. oext the ;goals and policies 6'h ai.ned in the y `General: Plan ih 'an .orderly and"consistent manner In the case of the .Precise Plans di,`scussed , hereil2, .the':major :pu`rpose is to -implementer the street,:`pattern depicted in the current Circulation Plan ;of Arterial Streets ,`: t ` ` and Highways, adopted as paint .+�f the Circulation `Element is December,: 1976. Some of.'the'� `proposed alignments, .,including the Lake Street 'extension;`.'have' '- . r ='I ; been' master -planned for a much longer . time. ' Overall policy 'direct ion- ,was _. est'ablished by General Plan Amendment 76-1A, adopted in .March, 1976, . which provided the ;impetus for most of the Precise ' Plans 'now under..consideration,,: The major;:thrust .of the, amendments to. the Circulation Plar. -Was to improve .access to 'the Downtown/Beach area by' providing sever al :alt:ernative north] 'south' arterials, necessitated by: the deletion of the, proposed Route `39. ,. (Beach Boulevard) Freeway. Another malor �goal was' the de-emphasis of,-Main Street .as a major traffic carrier -in the Downtown by rerouting traffic onto Seventeenth, Lake, and Delaware Streets and reducing Main Street -to local street status. 'A summary of the important events since the adoption1of GPA . 76-1A is given below. S. 1 Chronology . June 1, 1976 PPSA 76-1A and B (Closure of Seventeenth 'at Yorktown and between Clay and Dela,�are) . was tabled by, the Planning Commission so that it could be considered concurrently with the other Precise' Plans ii, the area (PPSA 76-6 A through E) . August 31, 1976 Staff presented a report oa the proposed alignments . (PPSA 76--1 and 76-6) . to the Planning Commission, arid " began preparation, of .an Environmental Impact Report The Commission at this time concul:red wi.th- the alternative alignments re;:ommended by staff. December 6 , 1976 The City Council approved EII2 76-5 covering all of the proposed alignments with the exception of PPSA 76-6n (Lake Street widening from Yorktown to Pacific Coast I Highway) . The. EIR incorporated a traffic impact' analysis prepared for the City by R:G. B. Engineering , Inc. which'- discussed the impacts of the proposed alignments . January 25, 1977 The . first of three Planning Commission study session' s . was held, , for the purpose of informally discussing the proposals and obtaining public - input. February 23t 1977 Second Planning Commission study session. The Cominiusion .., directed staff to delete PPSA 76-6E (Huntington Street: extension to Ellis) from further consideration, to set PPSA 76-6D .(Park and ' Pine ,Streets cul-de-sacs) for public leodllN hearing , . and to analyze several alternatives to - he proposed Lake Street , alignment, including elimination 'of both Lake -arid Main from the Circulation Plan, '':� .,01 Mar-ch . 29, 1977 Third Plannxni Commission study, ",ession`. The Commission :.,' '-,. directed ::staff to remove the Lake 'Street extension and widening (PPSA 76-6A -and s, from further consideration, to set the portion of PPSA .76--6C from Ellis to Garfield for.* ublic' hearin and ,:to, p g, prepare. revised.. recommend ations for' PPSA 76-1 A and :8 and the remainder 'of PPSA s 76--6C fora study session i May 3, 1977 The public hearing on PPSA , 76-=6C �01ain Street. Ra.;.-ign- mPnt from Ellis' to Garfield) and PPSA 76=ML (Park and Pine . Streets) was. tabled to 'allow for additional %notifi- cation of Affect�:d residents. May 25, .1977 In a commun?.cation tG the Planning Commission, four Department Heads (Hartge,. Picard, Robitaille, Moorehouse) , requested that the Lake Street extension and widening be reopened for discussion. June 7 , 1977 PPSA. 76-6D (closure -of Park and Pine Streets) approved by the Planning Commission. Staff was also directed 'to set the closure of Main Street at Seventeenth for public . . hearing, in response to a petition from area residents ... . July 12, 1977 In response to the Department Heads' request, the Com- mission reopened discussion of PPSA 76-6 A and B. Con- sensus was reached that a 'public hearing should • be held on the Lake Street extension and widening. At the same meeting, the Commission 'directed staff to begin process ing^ the revocation `of PPSA 70--4 (Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street , and Orange Avenue at their intersection) and to prepare a set of alternative alignments for a new Precise Plan. July 170, 1977 The City Council adopted PPSA 76-6D for the closure of Park and Pine Streets . August 11, 1977 Staff presented five alternatives for the alignment of Atlanta and Lake to the Planning CouLmission. Staff was directed to set the revocation 'of PPSA 70-4 for public hearing and to prepare a Precise Plan based on Alternative 5 to replace the old alignment. . . Sep. 29, 1977 The Planning Commission approved the revocation of PPSA 70--4 ' ' and directed staff to pursue both Alternatives 4 and 5 for a new alignment. December 20, 1977 PPSA 77-3 (Atlanta/Lake Alternatives 4 aid 5) :was tabled indefinitely so that it could be considered in conjunction w=.th the Lake Street extension and widening. May 7, 1978 The Planning Commission adopted a Resolution of Intent to . rctvohe Portion 3 of PPSA 70-A which provides for a direct connection between Atlanta 'Mtenue and . Orange Avenue. Consideration 'of this revocation was subsequently postponed until July 5 to allow the Commission to consider the propal in the context of all the other Precise Plans in the area . Also, pending before the Commission are resolutions of in-. tention to revoke. PPSA 70-2 (Delaware St. extension from Frankfort to Atlanta) and to adopt a Precise Plan for Atlanta between Beach and Huntington. Lake street::Sx'tension from Yarktown. to 'Garfie7.d . (PPSA 76-GA) General'+',Inforination ' i 5,� •r � This 1'propos,ed :alignment :has been a part of the_ Circulation Plari of 7�r.terial Streets'. and `Highways since at least the early'; 19601s:' '•,The f lia'sic+,purpose, behind - the extension `is to pacovide� �a":north-south r.. arterial . highway as An alternative to Beach Boulevard :between Five" Points . and . the Beach. : A seconu ,'.major objective � is .`to relieve 'the ., adverse ,impacts caused by ''the use of Main Street as a beach . a'ccess r` _ route. The extension of Lake Street coupled with the -diveksion' of traffic from Main St. onto Seventeenth, St. would effectively allevi ate the 'impacts 'in the residential neighborhood along Main St. The alignment 'proposed in PPSA 76,-6A provided for a primary arteriC1l y highway.- with a 100 foot right-of=way, generally corresponding to j the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way'. A number of 'variations on the. basic proposal were developed , in response to the. desire to preserve the railroad right-of-way and to minimize the impacts' on hill located just 'north of Yorktown and west of the railroad. 502. 2 Traffic Analysis i The projected traffic volume on the Lake Street extension according to the ' RGB Engineering study, would be 27 ,000 ADT. • .The extension I would result in an increase in trafri^ on Lake Street south of Yorktown to approximately 25 , 000 ADT at ultim ate 'development. This would be �compensated by a reduction in traffic on Main ' Street, particularly if certain other . Precise Plans (PPSA. 76-6C and D) ` were implemented as well. Conversely,. failure to provide the extension of Lake Street will result in a further increase in Main Street 'traffic, estimated at 23 , 000 ADT between 17th and 'l4th and . 19 , 000 ADT from 14th to 5th Street . These volumes exceed the- present and projected capacity of plain Street and will result an adverse. roise and safety impacts as well as traffic delays . . A further objective of this proposal in conjunction .with the Gothard Street realignment is the elimination of the five--way intersection . of Gothard, Main, and Garfield. The implementation of these Precise Plans .would significantly increase the efficiency and safety `of this intersection. 5. 2 . 3 Other Issues During previous discussions regarding the proposal , considerably.,. opposition developed from residents along Lake Street because of the increased traffic that would result. To put this issue in perspec- tive * it should be understood that the total traffic in ' the corridor between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest is independent of- the street. pa.ttern in this area. The goal of the City should .be to allocate this traffic among the available streets which are best .able to accommodate it without undue impacts. In the view of the City traffic consul.tant, *wake. Street is better . able .to .-handle ` the projected traffic-. than Main Street (because. of its limited, width � and residential character) or Delawi`lre Street because it does not extend to Pacific Coast Highway. Lake Street. has a relatively limited amount of residential frontage, pnd could be developed as : an arterial•:'''; with the least amount of disruption to the City of any, of the, alter- natives. 'Atiother,' 'potential :issue ,. is the_ effect ofy':the- ex't:ensidn . of ` Lake on the .commercial `center. `at: Main- and. Yorktown. The diversion. of traffic .onto Fake will• tend to, reduce. the traffic on this section cif Main and. adverrsely arfFet'.ihe viab.ility of .this center. This °- impact will be mitigated. to some- ex increased volumes on , Main due t;o the Gothard Street realignment (estimated 'at 211 00�J ADT) and projected`'increases in volumes on Yorktown (13 000}arid: Golden- "k west (331000) . , 5.2. 4 Priority The 'Lake Street..exttension is in effect the central proposal on which several of the other Precise Plans , hinge. Decisions, regarding the extension will have considerable impact on the Gothard Realignment, .. Main Street diversion, and the Atlanta/Lake alternatives. Consequently, staff feel that it is important to establish a':'direction on. .this posal before proceeding on the other alignments under consideration. 5 : 3 Lake Street Wideanitigfrone Yorktown to Pacific Coast Highway (PPSA 76 5 .3 . 1 General. information }� - Lake Street is currently designated as a primary arterial , for which ' the standard. right-of-way width would be 100 ..'feet . The right-of--way at present 'is 90 feet wide for most of its length between Yorktown and Pacific Coast Highway, with 45 feet on either side of the center-: . line. PPSA 76-6B proposed to increase this width, to 106 feet, with the additional right-of--way coming entirely from the east side 'of ` theme street, which is largely. vacant. To accomplish this widening between 1.0th Street and Hartford Avenue, however , would require the relocation.- of a portion of the facilities at the Southern California Edison Wave Smbstation and the Lake Street fire Station. The Precise Plan there-- . fore proposed to curve the alignment to the west and reduce the width to lower the implementation cost, of the project. in the absence 'of. the Precise Plan , dedication along the east 'side of L-ike would: be to a width of 100 feet (an additional ten feet) . . A nember of subdivision maps have been submitted and approved by the City along Lake Street providing for varying amounts of street dedi- c4tic:n. One of these (TT 9234 - Huntington Beach Company) has'. ex-- pii-ed ,--a .second (TT 9388-Lindborg) was .denied by the Coastal Com- m I ission, - and a third is currently. under consideration by the Plan ning C�immission. . t % 5.3. 2 Traffic Analysis Existing traffic volumes on Lake Street range from 2900 'to _ 3900 ADT. In the event Lake Street is not extended to Garfield,- these volumes can bea expected to increase substantially at ultimate development, but will not exceed the capacity of the street as it presently -exists. If Lake is extended, however, , the projected traffic volume is estimated .at 25 , 000 ADT at. ultimate develnpment. Thir;' volume would . require that Lake be improved to primary arterial utatus, .with four traffic lanes and a median. ',i'he right-of-way would alst.) in- elude aparkin lane on the ,west west side (and �st3ibl both sides . .9 P y ) anc . 1 f ) � 4 kilk� �la� e d , t e nes .`on eiti r �si e. The parking lane on the - east side , may :not 'be' netiess r� si ice develo ent ,i h' �, a n in n, t is area would e` a 11 P n ra 9 Y . 'take ' lle 1:access fro an a • a on t}ie Pacif' c ,m a. E ec i . . Y g l tr c� right-�of way rather t a on Lake Street. . h n S.`3, 3 ..Priority Since dedication to a width of 100 ,,ft. is possible even..without ,a ,`, y, :`•;` : ,� ' Precise Plan, this proposal is not felt. to have as much immediate •s. ustification as most `of the other Precise Plans under discussion.• Staff ,t}iereforet feels that the City should simply, continue to require ' dedication on the east side of Lake of 55 ft, as .development -occurs: A` Precise Plan , may, however, be necessary in the long term .to. 'acquire t p?;operty in the area between 10th and Hartford which is already df"vel6ped. 5. 4 Realignment of Gothard Street from Ellis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue x (PPSA 76--6C) 5. 4 . 1 General Information PPSA 76-6C proposes to realign Gothard Street beginning at Ellis Avenue , curving westerly to intersect with the existing right-of-way of Y ri Cr stal .5treet. Utilizingthis right-of-way, Gothard would con : . 9 ,�. tinge south to intersect Main Street between Clay and Yorktown. The , . existing Gothard right.-of--way between Ellis and -the Garfield/Main intersection would be vacated under this proposal. If implemented in conjunction with the Lake Street extension, the portion of 'Main Street between Garfield and its intersection with the realigned Gothard Street would be either abandoned or reduced to ` local street standards. One alternative would be to curve Main Street into. Gothard at the existing Clay/Crystal intersection. The objectives of this realignment would be: (1) to create a viable north/south arterial composed of Gothard , Main, and Seventeenth Street (in conjunction with other Precise Plans to divert traffic from the downtown portion Gf Main St. ) and (2) to eliminate the . Aive-way intersection at Main and Garfield. The Circulation Plan designates the Gothard realignment as a secondary. arterial (80 ' right-of-way) from Ellis to Garfield and a primary arterial from that point south. The existing Crystal Street right- of-way is 60 feet wide. Therefore, dedication of an additional ten feet of right--of-way on each side would be required. This proposal' would also require the purchase of right-of-way between Crystal and Ellis , and between Clay and existing Main Street. 5. 4. 2 Traffic Analysis The Existing traffic volume on -the portion of Gothard to be realigned is 4 200 ADT. This traffic would all utilize the realigned street ser.tion at least from Ellis to Garfield. Ultimate traffic volume on this section is estimated . 19 , 000 ADT. The projection for the ports o:? - between , Garfield and Yorktown is 21., A00-23 ,040 ADT. These: volumes can be accommodated by the street widths proposed in PPSA 76-6C. ' ''' Slxmination. .of the five way intersection at thin;'end Garfield wi11.°substantially reduce `traffic delays. and " improve safety canditions i'n this . area 5. 4. 3 Other. Issues " This Precise Plan : is closely reI ted "to the Planning' Department.':s ` .Garfield-Gbldenwest Study, which will be discussed at' an upcoming -'study `session. Decisions made 'regarding the Gothard. realignment` will .. have a major influence `on what land use 'opt:ions are : availablE in this ;area. Staff feels that the circulation issues should be rep solved prior to land use decisions being made. The. Gothard realignment is interrelated with the Lake Street extension, the Main Street abandonment (PPSA 76-6D) �-tnd the - diversion af -Main Street -traffic to Seventeenth. In particular, if Lake Street,, is not .extended and Plain Street continues to serve as a prinary- arterial, the design of the intersection' of Gothard and Main may, need to be -altered, to favor Main Street traffic over Gothard. 5. 4 . 4 Priority In . terms of immediate usefulness and ease of implementation, staff feels that this Precise Plan should be given a, high priority. How--.' ever, since some of the specific .detai.l.s of the realignment depend:-on .. whether or not Lake Street is to be extended, . policy direction: regardinc. Lake should be established prior to initiating the Precise Plan. 5. 5 Vacation of Main' Street between Garfield and Yorktown and the Closure of Main Street at ' Seventeenth (PPSA 76-6D) . h: 5. 5. 1 General Informations PPSA 76-6D , in conjunction with the Lake extension and Gothard realign- ment, is intended to . complete the deemphasis of Main Street , as a downtown beach access route. The proposal. involve, complete - abandon- ment of the sections of Main Street. between Garfield and Holly Street and from Clay to the realigned Gothard Street. The section between Holly and Clay would be retained for local circulation purposea, . but reduced to half its present width. It may be possible to trade some , .. of the abandoned right-of-way for land required for the Gothard realignment. The diversion of traffic from Main to Seventeenth could be accomplished either by complete closure of. Main or by partial closure and channel-..: ization of .traffic. The latter would probably be preferable due to the need for emergency vehicle access and local circulation. 1 . 5. 5 ' 2: :Tra f is Analysis ,,.. .=Main Ztreet between Garfield and Yorktown presently carries; about 13 , OU.0 vehicles. Per .day. Frc m Yorktown to Fourteenth the volume is. 14, 200 ADT, and the ,traffic gradually tapers off .from `that point i south. These-volumes could, be expected to increase substantially }, 'if the present 'ciiculation pattern is retained and-. will far exceed the planned capacity of portions of Main Street. Completion • of the Lake Street extension will divert .some .of this volume. but ;the T Gothard realignment may offset this reduction to some extent. Th,a 'diversion of traffic onto Seventeenth would reduce `traffic', t noise !and safet impacts on the lower• art of Main but will 'cause so-ire• in�-Y P P 7 crease in traffic te : on Seventeenth. The projected'.'ected•. traffic. volume .•�,rs estimated at 16, 000, easily accommodated by the present 40 foot ;fight�-- of-way on Seventeenth. i If Lake is extended, the portion of Bain between Garfield and Y4 ktown will no longer be necessary for arterial street purposes, since" ►11 non-local traffic would utilize Lake. if Lake were not extender•, ' the'°,,'. .: abandonment would not be feasible and the street would continue. to serve as a beach access route. In that event, the intersectS'�on .. . of Gothard and Main at Clay would have to be designed to facilitate . I Main Street traffic. 5. 5.3 Other Issues Like the Gothard realignment, this proposal will influence land use decisions in the Garfield/Goldenwest area, and should be acted on prior to those decisions being made. Abandonment of Main Street could provide greater opportunities .for planned 'developments in 'this area , for example. The closure of Main at Seventeenth will have a positive impact :on -the. neighborhood around Lake Park, because of substantially reduced traffi-_- However , the provision of limited local, access and access for emergence vehicles may be important issues regarding this proposal. The potential increase in traffic on Seventeenth may result 3.n opposi-- tion from residents in that area. However, as has been noted ,' Seventeenth is far better able to handle projected volumes than is Main Street, due to its greater width. 5. 5. 4 Priority The abandonment of Main should be considered in conjunction with the Gothard realignment, both dependent on the direction established re- garding Lake Street. The 'diversion of Main at Seventeenth is not felt to be as necessary in the short term as the other proposals, and can be delayed . for t1 .e time being. if Main ,continues to function' as an arterial and volumes increase, there will be increased justification for the diversion. Interim measures could be con- sidered to direct traffic onto Seventeenth by ,means of striping and signaliza -ion. t Q J e,, 'Sei ddnth At; C d�eht -.'Uti a.-.'an ;Yor own -a N c tion of Fw 4d a a S n eventeenth;,between,.-Delaware'-w a dzClay.!.. (PPSA ,76 '1,,.'A ' 5 4; 69­1 G al.;'In format i6n.: ' e nid r J, These measures are intended. to.. reduce' the ,utilizat'i*6n ,`o[ Seventeenth ­ ,- ' : ­ .,,,,Stree'tbetween . Main andGarf ield ;;Sihce Sev teenth runs dia4d .M 'this ,.area, its use` results' I a c S ' in rse n. in n tr ffic onflict -at ctio s and, 'own' Lake.' � Th i a t PArti6­ l&-,ly-,at- Main ,' at' Yorkt i.-wi h ; other stre6ts' ­ u Precise ­Plan.' w' ould eliminate the ,fl `M ive way ,. inte' r" secticins ' at . 61n. Strde't Seventeen and' ,Yorkt6wn :arid "discourage',. traffic from Utilizing:, by.,.in . erruptng ow at :De a,;iare Street.. .'Thd.� .objebtive ,would t the flow - local street status as ifitdlideU :by the: be :to � reduce Seventeenth to Circulation n section between Utica- and . o ir ulation Pla . —The se YorktownW, uld be accessed via , Pine street,, used 'pririly for access to and from . ei n- a the!'Civic Center. n� These actions ' are'-not expected to result- in any significant 'disriiptio­h travel " attern of lexis.tifi� . st and would 'improve considerably* the p cifficiency and safety of several intersections . 5 .'6 2 Priority PPSA 76-1- A and B are not direc tly ctly related to any of the 'other 'proposed -alignments under consideration , ant .can therefore' be initiated at any time. In. the opinion - oif Staff, these measures.-sh '0 uld be assigned a relatively low priority. 5. 7 Realignment of. Atlanta AvenueIntersection 'and*. Lake Their rs (PPSA 70-41. : PPSA. 77-3) , 5. 7 . 1: "General Information PPSA 70-4 , which wds adopted in early 1971 and is still .in effe ct, provides rovides for the direct connection of Atlanta Avenue (a, major arterial) , vith a one-way couplet composed of Orange Mie­ nue and Olive Avenue . This configuration was in conformance with the 'Circulation - Plan in effect at that time, and was intended to improve east/West circulation in the downtown area (this is still an important objective of .the Cirdulation, Plan) . 'Since the adoption of PPSA 70-4t several circumstances have changed: (1) The Orange-Olive couplet has been del6ted from the :C-Irculation !. Plan; --us for (2) Traffic' studies have ,.shown major arterial, that l status -AtlanLa Avenue is. not, necessary to handle projected volumes; and , (3) Property owners in this area have , expressed . the "desire to develop, property presently encumbered by the Pre'ci' e Plan, ' ' Since PPSA 70-4 'no longer reflects current circulation plans, P oceedings' to revoke the aligrim nt have bden ' initiated , ­livthe falt . a r M Of 19.77 the- Planning. S t Staff dovelolind five new 'altoativ nt e align cinto some h of;,which. connected Atlanta dir6ctly with - Orange Avenue la :.. ' " - secondary :arteridl,' Consideration ,.of the revocation and th alignment ' a lignment '.has bedn­'postpanad * until th*ey could ,)j e' ulsctis ed i h.. Elte Coatext"of the Utke.' Sti:eet- P reciisd:'Plahs..' ;V I y • � ;� 1 s fic.,/Analysis The .traffic volume on Atlanta Avonue- is: currently: about 500 �ADT� and, is :projected' io be , approxi.mately 0j'000 ADT at` ultimate ::develop-.., ment. This volume can easily be accommodated by a primary arterial with a 104' right--of 'way (present width `is 601 ) The' miain . tkaffic consideration regarding this-.Precise.'Plan is the intersection configuration at. Atlanta and' take:.. The .present 'off et '. intersection requires traffic moving` -on "Orange: and Atlanta to -jog down ; Lake Street for a .short distance. As volumes increase:,on 'these ' streets this configuration .will be66me - increasin9ly unsatisfactory. : One way to :-esolve the problem is to swing Atlanta north, to intersect { -' Lake opposite from Orange. This would clearly improve east/west~;. circulation, but- would involve substantial costs in ' terms � ,of -; acguistion and relocation. A second `alternative, involves curving Atlanta south into the existing Lake Street right-of-way arid `bringing La S a F Lake Street into Atlanta in a 7. intersection on the Werra. This, would, deemphasize the use of Lake Street as well as adversely impact downtown access. However, it would -provide additional beach access via Beach Boulevard' and Atlanta, 'and might. be the best option available in the event. Lake Street is not extended to the north. 5. 7 . 3 [Other 'Issues The proposed Atlanta ;alignments (and PPSA 70--4) all ' in volvie impacts of varying degree on properties on both sides . of Atlanta . PPSA 70--,41 ' if ''implemented immediately, would. require the relocation of several residences at great cost to the City. :the impacts of the new ;alternatives are not as severe, but . would still .involve substantial relocation. However, traffic volumes will not be sufficient to necessitate the realignment in the- short term. Therefore, the relocation impacts can be mitigated by adopting a Precise Plan and acquiring the needed right-of-way gradually through' dedication . i As mentioned previously, the alternative configurations proposed for the Atlanta/sake lnterse.tion are interrelated with the Lake Street extension. If Lake is to become a primary beach access route -(w' th the extension) ; the intersection should be designed to favor Lake . . Street traffic over Atlanta and Orange. If not, Atlanta would become relatively more important. 5. 7. 4. Priority Because of the development pressure. i.n the area ,. the ina'opropriateness • of .the existing Precise Plan, and the fact that a.. Resoultion of. Intent.: has already been adopted by the Commission, Staff feels that this Precise Plan should hove a high priority. Rather than revoke only Portion 3 'of PPSA 70-4 , as. proposed in' the Resolution of Intent, Staff suggests that a new aligrrnent be selecte-3 .frcm ;he five,alternatives pri.,v.iously prep<vred and analyzed by staff. The mr Precise,Plan can then be a&otee: .' concurrently with the revmition of *e entire PPSA-'rv=a alignment. .""5. 8 Extension of Delaware Street between Frankfort Avenue and Pacifica Coast. Highway (PPSA 70-2 a�SA 70-3) General 1n. okmation, T T?ie purpose of t?iis ,alignment is to make ..Delaware a , via' ble .,,north/south ..: anteri al and alternative beach access .route,` thereby r elieva n`y '. :. pressure : can Beach Boulevard and Lake. Street. PPSA %70-�2', ado0ted .in July, .19?0,, provides for Delaware to proceed waufh frocn Frankfort to Atlanta, wi.denxrg from 80 " feet to 100 feet . PPSA '7.0-3 . extends , Delaware 'south from that point, curving aresterly. to intersect Pacific. Coast Highway utilizing sport' 'o£ the existing IHuntington .Street,• . ' right-of-way. The 'alig nine nt ,would be 10O. feet in width., ;These two Precise' Plans 'are . not in conformance with the existing Circulation plan, which. designates Oelaware as a secondary . arterial ,;: (projected traffic .valumes do not justify,,a primary) . in addition, development: activity on both sides of Atlanta Avenue has brought uut the need to reevaluate these Precise Plans in light of revised City pol..icy. Tentative Tract 9580 (W & B Bui.lders) , located or) the southwest corner of Atlanta and Beach, depicts an- alignment from Delaware which is 60 feet wide rather than 1.00 feet. At: the time the " Tentative' Map: was approved, it was pointed out that' prior . to recordation of the Final Map it would be necessary to revoke PPSA 70-4 . The intention was to adopt a new Precise Plan which conformed to the Circulation Plan and the alignment- shown'. on the Tentative Map. This tract "is currently under: appeal. to ' the State Coastal. Commission. Tentative Tract 10248 (Ayres) , located on the nc.tirth side of Atlanta , also depicts an 80 loot alignment for Delaware which .conforms too the alignment shown on T.T. 9580. 1. condition of approval recommended by Staff is that PPSA 70-2 be revoked prior to recordation of the Final Map. If -he Precise Plan is revoked andthe tract approved , there will be no need to adopt a new Precise Plan. for Delaware + north of Atlanta. , I 5 .8 , 2 Traffic Analysis Traffic projections for the Delaware extension . range from 4 , 250 to 8 ,000 north of Atlanta and from 10 ,500 to 11 ,000 'south to Pacific Coast Highway .in the short term, vouines north of Atlanta should be less than indicated by these projections probably less than 5 ,000) . The .cannection between Atlanta and Pacific Coast highway, while ,not necessary at this time, will become more important as additional development occurs. This will be especially true.. f Lake Street is not extended, since Delaware would then be mo,.•e important for north : south . carculation, particularly 'during peak p'ericds . S. 8 . 3 Other Issues As is the case .with the Atlanta/Lake alignment, the extension of Delaware south of , Atlanta ,would invol.ve' s�ibstantial .relocation issues. • ... The alignment impacts an exist-ing mobile ,`home park" rind would require;, relocation of a large number of units if implemented, in the. shor tar Since there is.- no immediate. need for the coonection, , the Precise t Plan is best viewed as a long range objective of the City, ''a • _ l4 y, r, y h j' Cg M}0 i . 8,,`4 . Priority F Due tb the current development: activity .an Atlanta, the revocation of PPSA 70-2 and :70-3 should ,be given a high priority. -A- Resolution of Intent for the revocation of PPSA 70-2 has already been . prepared : h : t conjunction with, Tentative Tract 102�8; .which is -pending `before . the . '.' Planning Commission. 6 0 ' ItECOM.MENDATIONS: ' Because.`of ' the interrelationships among the various proposals under discussion', { :, Staff suggests that the Planning Commission first reiterate 'the ?olicy Airecti:on established - by General Plan. Amendment .76-1A and indicated, in, the current Circulation Plan, and adopt the 'following general phasing 'oF individual Precise Plans : li 1 First Priority Y . f -- Atlanta/Lake (revocation of PPSA 70--4 , consideration of new alter na- Live alignments) . - Delaware Extension (revocation of PPSA 70-2 and possibly 70--3) . (2) Second Priority Gothard Realignment from Ellis to Yorktown (PPSA 76-'GC) . (3) Third Priority Lake Street .Extension (PPSA 76--6A) . Main Street Abandonment between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6,D) . (A) Fourth Priority -- Closure of .lain at Seventeenth (PI-SA 76--6D) - Closure of Seventeenth at Utica and Yorktown and between• Dolaware and Clay (PPSA 76 -1 A and B) . Lake. Street Widening (PPSA 76-6B) . .Staff also re:c;oacunends that the Commission direct the initiation of- the . PreciSp Plans listed under (1) and (2) above, beginning with the necessary 'Resolutions � of Intention and environmental documentation. .. OD/ ,attachments : Locat:.on Maps 2. Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways 3. . Exist . ,ng Traffic Volume"-Map ohm r'srs+ i'i'SA 76-6 Ci { f r' '.�`�;,�, -•— l.:�.::i _,., •k r7- i •rf� ;{ •��, 't'!'SA 76.1 A`; � I?:3. ..... + 76-1 s'''•' �l! j~�� _ .. ..._.��..� .+� l �•� ,. !.�! it �„{i }xr �f Il �;t.f��� ! w i'l+3A 766 Il 7b-l'i 11UJU ij = �'�� �if f .�• r ��C: � G;I1N ' �: �` '� ! �j��!����) 1 �jajf�f��; �x►.���.z�..., %. .:+�. ��'r. ..�. 1.�T� r�. 1C� ir'ti .i.11:. if..► .i�`:iltr.. il_.._.�""���::�:r::::.�t��� i LOCATION MAP Now" {t�ai,�f+raMnl yt trihi d MaiWk tUlil1i111111/1/ voralH)"al#;Oils! tit SlrtN(]Haut ' .. IllwiwGitYr t1KN 14UNTIMCTOW NV H PUMMING DEPT, f ,#, s th4sIlS -RMir f}i 1 i 1.' ". :-..1 ( .,,•iii I j i '�',; {: �CI��UJIMMI _ � � . 7 CDCL� f .. ����.�.�j-,.7�' � ♦+ �;4 . :�� Vi-w jr 101110 ME / WSA 70-t iTSA 70�2 '��. � '� 1 „ ��,�f� I' � � t Wit: ►,i".�:iitc�_`•:`�l�t'i�l,r �' ,,...._<._ � .-� 11 •.AIN'�l. •� f r• ti*�}►, l j i t1 1 ( LOCAT 1014 MAP ' 11�.+111•aGlfYi Il iGM. HUNTINGTON REACH P"SMING nCPT. Ail AMP CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL ' STREETi AND HiGHW�AYS F�CLUT�! MG�{:69.OEC.6,t976 - LEGEND: U. fREEVAY 5'IMEI CAPSaff. are.. MAJOR» 45" NOT s ' swa Lms savt+drt traram soar Or w ` W? NrCK38414r kf attt I11T V IM . QA�um oOGut Am" WAM to ' M 3 _ .0m%M* CITY O HUNTINGTON BEACH �'• CRAlMGE COMITY CALIFAFMA Minutes,. '�i .1�: ,Plan Comma.ssfon , June 22 ,; i978 ..Provision cif ' services and uti liter' i o the�`-alreas of, concern Seas 'dia ` ;i cussed, :i:n particular 'how. sewer service would be provided 'in �t:he event t ie `coast: trunk line As . not ini*Aall A. . Cos!►missioner Stern regut?stred x;. that Public: Works; sup°ply more, information .on sewers in the area, for ? the Commission 's public. heari.ngg 'on the. amendment. The Commission. also.,discus sed the possibility 'that ` approval bf . the General Plan redesignations would prejudice the Ci y's Local Coastal'" ` : - Program. Ed Selich explained 'that the LCP will, when completed, become an' element.-in 'the G6nerall Plan and will .supersede' any -General;,Plan 'des- ignatiwns previously ,`mad'e. Procedure td follow in .the interim `period before finalization . of the LCP . was 'reviewed, and its" was` the 'expressed ' .`desire of the ,Commission 'that any amendment to . the General Plan affecting :,areas within the coastal ,zone should be' 'considered - in light `of., the ' Local Coastal Plan'. Commissioner, Paone requested that, information showing traffic . coniparison among 'different prssible uses in the Pacific. Coast,' Highway and Beach `Boulevard area be presented ; e.g . , office buildings, retail , hotels, etc. , with emphasis on comparisons between those. with. primarily weekday ' uses vs. those having typical weekend . and evening uses. PRECISE PLANS OF STREET ALIGNIALUTIT Bill Derrick presented vugraphs of the proposed precise plans -of street alignment .and gave a general overview, including objectives of the City' s . Circulation Element and a history of. the various precise plans, presented for review., The Planni.ag Commission will be asked to reaffirm its -policy direction established by General Plan Amendment 76-1A and to establish a priority list. for phasing of the individual. precise plans . Fire Chief Picard addressed the Commission and - outlined some of the problem intersections and ' street alignments which his department .wiild like to see corrected. It was his opinion that the Gothard xealignrient i should be given first priority, with the Lake: Street extension also of immediate importance for emergency equipment circulation . Corunission review followed. . The Atlanta Avenue alignment was c:iscussed in regard to the need . for. east-west circulation, attempt to eliminate the .; dog leg i.ntersecti.o. of Atlanta, Lake, and Orange, and possible signalixa- tion of that intersection. . Staff was . instructed to implement. Alternative. No. I with an ''OD-foot street wider, with no parkway and, no parking 'on- the street. Alignment of the s`creet should also be be changed to minimize property taake from adjacent 'lots . Planni.ng staff informed : the Commission of their feeling ghat, the,.!.,ahe Street extension is the key issue, affecting 'the circulation . pat�tti n. ,for all the other proposed plans, and requested direction that this plan -is ' till a 'viable .,approach before proceed3,ng. ' After. extensive •dixcussiont r; :.w it was determined to proceed with the extension and that the wideni�ng ;o . ' Lake. should also be ,included in consideration of the' precise 'plan . 1 . F 4 :Minutes , H.I . "Plan`n ,, Coirimispion .: 'June .22y 1978 Page .'4 t. Conuiti's'sioner Russell .`noted that the extensions "of Fake and DelAwar'e, 'the: closure of Taylor, the realignment .of �Gothard, "and:•the' 'on=going devel�rineiit on Main Street wi. 1l all `serve to increase .-L:he burden of tra£f it tYie •iiite*rsect on of. Main, Ellis, ' and Aeach at Five ,points. He ` requested.,:that, staff 'Include this intersection .in the ' study and present alternatives for modification of 'that intersection. The following priority . list :was established by con,sensus1: (1) First. Priority Atlanta/Lake (rev.ocation; 'of PPSA 70-4 , considFeratzon of new , . , ; alternative alignment. modified to 80--foot width) -- Delaware Extension (revocation of PPSA 70-2 and ' possibly 70--3) (2) . Second Priority Gothard Realignment from Ellis to Yorktown (PPSA . 76-6C) (3) Third Priority i Lake Street Extension (PPSA 76 :6A) -- Lake Street Widening (PPSA 76-6B) ` Main Street Abandonment between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6L, i (9) Fourth Priority -- Partial Closure. of Main at Seventeenth (PPSA. 76--6D, modified to leav,33 'partially open in some fashion) t I r - Closure of Seventeenth at Utica and Yorktown and between Delaware ' and Clay (PPSA 76-1 A and B) i Modification of the Five Points intersection (preparation of, alternative treatments) The meeting was adjourned to. June 27 , 1976 , at 7 : 00. n:m. Edward D. :elich Ruth Finley ;. Secretary Chairman ,, - a —4— PC . 6"22-75 F..08 tc ards NMICl At :MKIC kWING 4` FRPrOM .PUN CF.-STHM` UACMen NO. 79--3 WrICE"IS ,HEREDY .GIVEN' that a piublir ' htaring .r►ill 1314 .geld'' by ttia +C ty:`co '" of,: Che. C£t�r of tit t`aim ,leach, An tho 'couticil Chanrb�er ©f tht Civic ��Center, Hmttin�tcm le h, at the{'`hater og .• O.M. or iraon therea ter as possible, on r�Idaw ahe 2nd day19 79 for the purpose of" considering Precise Plan of Street Aliment No, '79-3, a proposal to precisely • ' I Tan Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue establishing 90 fLLet of rig�it of tray A legal description is on file in °tire Pl�ruii,� LGt..�ri.trent Office. ,All interested pernmo ere , invited to attend said hedring 'and QzP ress their opinions for or. agataci t raid 9X&I-Ink, et Alirjrient. further information, say be obtaim'd from the Office .of the City . Clerk : 2000 Fhin'Stmet, Huntington Beach,- CA 92646 (714) 536-•5226 x; VA /".ti ! << CITY OF, MWI� �Y.14CN �s ll►lieia �f. �a�atx[�rt�i City. +Glom NOTICE,TO CLLRK 16.5CHEDULE PUBLIC BEARING .ITEM ._ I r TO: 'CITY *CLERKS OFFICE DATE. r FROM v r. •t. ) PLEASE. SCHEDULE A -PUHT,IC HEARING USING .T1iE ATTACHED LEGAL tiGTICE FOR THE DAY 0F 19 AP a .are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commiscion Planning Department Petition * AppeFl Other Adoption' of Environmental . Stacus. (x) YES 'N O Refer .to _ � Planning .Department - _Extenslon #.: :1. .... ' for additional information. If appeal, , please tran i exact wording to 'be required in the legal P,ubli hi d � .i.?' ra�,�ena�nt `NeW`8 f 4. ° 'j ' 1 r•� r .' -1LK�"./�Xi��.CRri7�7�A t r d tr t;".1. ,1LEGAL NOTICE < NOTICE OFr PUBLIC `HEARING t r r Preaise Plan ;of Street Alignment Nu: ' 79--3 ' ' '{ 'NOTICE IS: HEREBY.GIVEN that a„ public :hearing w�.11, be held NOTICE , by: the City, Planning Commission .•of .the 'City of:• Huntington °:Beach, ' = ,.California, fear`'the purpose of -considering Precise,'Plan .©f Street Alignment No . 79-3r a �propo8al to.`preci:sel -plan* Lake Street `between 'Indianapalis 'Avenue and Yorktown Avenue establishl: g , r• ,� 90- feet' of right `of way., '`,,A legal description is on file in • the"..Planning Department Office" . Said 'hearing will be held at the hour of 7: 00 P—M. , 'on • June 5, 1979 , in the Council Chambers Building 'of'. the . Civic Center, 2000 Main .Street, i�untirgton �seach, California. <. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing'.and express their opinions for 'or against the proposed : Precise Plan of Street" Alignment .Np. 79-3 , Further .information may be obtained from :the City Pltnnirig: ' Department. Telephdne No. (714) 536-5271 DATED this 24th clay of May ,. 1979 CITE'! PIANNING , C014MISSION James . 111. Palin By Acting Secretary � a s .tr � !% rtlt• pTI. A 'n79-13 25-046-17 25-05-07.1 979 Oil 2130 W. Iddar,Aww" RA*rt, *yen i. ArAllratm, CR. 92804 17132 TrImhavai IAM NuutiNtm a0whe !ch. 9A47 25`O�iS--U�1 : ; : ! � 0�-�16 �, 2.5�A55-06 •• Jim" DWAMIlee Hatt MUM AMA.M mrrru" 1175 .rdptiir CL'rcle 6012 PiAx rt 1cm Dr.. 40911.:20th Street f D AX&bw m Rich, CA. '!M7 *atingtan 1leadt, 4'm►Ii1 25-04s=0 025-M--10 xsr-o . tip am Axyual`lo et Al A�adiuriok t Ri+ry�i�c; .527 M dA Sir.� 7541 •AAtr ay Dr. . UZI Alebum stsrst Ru tington'Pasrah,. 0. 92648 «tmdngt m (A. 92647 Hunfilx�-beach ci it 92648 25.045� 03 2S-Q -II : 25-055-W Clau& r4Lcta at AI city of iix tixqtm Beadh i>rm thy 1mm at rl 7721 bolgat a AvwnA ` u G oxvo r Aft. W . min atw, CPU, 92683 9691 1Oth"V ety Drive AmrIngton Beach* Calm 92644 25-055- 01 25-055-10 Fbbect, .74on Ot al John Shanks Vinton D marriot,t 3)q5 Pi aw Plam 418 r. oamen Fret 13.13 t Avrr" Oostdr lima, CR. 42626 Bk1.bo+a, C h. 92661 IWtlrvjban , C&l f 92449 25-055--02 x5-055-1.1 'ii4liarm rdwroy ?ors th Frerlm Casrlmn L .Wul 545 t4orwc Uwe 1217 Al St. "02 Lnrraino Drive ria I lbeirK* M. 92028 rhmUngtim Beach, C h. 92648 UuntimlUmi bo%mh, C l.i t 9x"6 25-04 5-14 25--b5�s-03 2r-�1SSwl 2 Stevan R m PMA mu*iwi:cs nAVA" C Ubad 19611 Akku ldr, Lame 9748 % lcw Or. 1.105 PJAMM AVOMN . lhmtin7tmn r%wwh, CA. 92646 rtAq rry►, ak. 90240 AmUngtan Mach, Calf.'! 92648 25-rA6-14 25-055--04 25•-055-13 marl lX et Al rwelyn still Crruin C.Jahnomi Y',11 Jubel Circle 1211 Alsb&m Amu 1101 AJAbms Ave"jm thmtiix F*wm:h. C}1. 47649 jL3ntjngtacn Demah, M. 9264U llun!_irytxera Lvoche Wil 9264ra ,15-o46--17 25-055-05 25�SC�15 ^,t;,e�at`en 't'rrel la lcrct�'ti+aen i�,e`dt .�cxeer� H G�11I ;, 3l 3f1 w. .43. 1 j jk j1 j 1207 Ale bw& Struat 11300 tl� Circle Muntingt cin rkm ch, Ca. 92648 Aaunta.iat Valley, C.et.lit 92709 23-t155NQ�6 ,., ti AR'at� °q�e► '' � '•1 ♦l'.�; -Awl St.ro kt 'ZI1 t � Sx zoaa-- fESrank �► I�Lt.L.tirvt,a►ry t Al End L w 1 ll.iam 7757 Zel"h PR6ii► 1210 pi o Str t H►I rtis C+a]if 14y 10, 1979 Ga? . Ikff*AXi;tM Aeadh, CAUf . . 91335 12618 . . . _ ?.aid 8antaagrprisrw 18►at*A I how be Id- � William B Pardin L520 U AMMi Drl.ve TM DiAsLoo . . 1201 Lrirre Fstavwt Padfk Palisac'AW,' Ca1_iJE U5 BWAIh ftsuft IJ6IW v#M Ut ooh IM, ! 9d272 fin FronoAMM Cka tf 94120 ' . 92648 25wO,+frm% i 23-03~15 23-C+B3-a7 Joe T. CiLiw ft"WAnd M bst33 rMtt tit #t#rvM LL522 boithrlif f Utiva 9712 Clowta rook o rivw 1201 Lim Stra�rt Santa Arr►, . Calif "uniinutar " in I -.i-, Clx?.if Utx►t:ilr,;tm x, `ali f �. 92705 92646 92648 25-0Sb-07 , . Z�-Os3'-1d � . 23-�48i•-a6i I'x'a�cirw ,: iaor�o Kilim S GM" U rvid Hilb= 9"2 St�our,�,l1 circle Alva .AUK 09 12 LA* Stxvet Aiiits4tcx Ems, CA1i.i' 213 )d� hv+�tm HmtiMt m beat#►, C LUf 9Zir46 Umti�gt w , CralU 926" 92648 j . . . _ j 1,5-OSfr-46 23-GG3"-13 23�.18G--02 h�ritt,i A ft)tarnt 3rd Mwws C Rcbstin DwAld C,iffacd 3101 Tr=A m 209 Ad►wa Avom a 1102 PJM Stcwt ( anger, C&U-f anti ngtun boach, Calif l;aant Nto n Bret►, Calif 92667 92648 92648 2 -45+ -QA 233~12 1 23-086-15 Lblb u►;ne A W" Chriptaphor R Ru-rir�n4 , Jo.hn M Aurrk&x 2707 W. I ;afforsai Blvd 428 12t1a Str ort .1108 pin, stoat: , uw Atxfisltw, Calif &ntirwitm Hrru►, t:e1.iY tour Ungtxxi L*hch, Cauf 9U018 9.12648 92648 2 - %-la a3-oi3*-u 2.1-036-09 (axwtAm 2 Phenix at as L U fW at al Dept of Wt a Afr4irs of . 3U7 EsttM Str t 201 AdM" hvear►uer StAto of Calif. ; wou MOLM, w i f AM tiD jbM DWAch s Calif ClAr IAM E RO t'h*rt 92627 92648 U12 bw RX"ot ; mp "%' FWv ct+, Caa l i f 197441e 25-056-11 23-083-05 23--MGG-08 NexIs E Cad* ',IMU M Edw►jrrr J 13kna 19381 Wocd star IAM 1202 Pine Stzot 11.16 Pine St nwt 1 ka*Angt cn Dewzi, Calif IM*iM-wn t fi, CA lif Mintirw1b n IWoch, Calif 92646 92648 92646 25-056-13 23-083-17 ' l.y li) G IAset Ge►tY C Ae ► 23-118"7 901 Alabmadt kvvwm 12Q�b ritl�i Street wl 11A ea i L*kknj; ily'1tW, tt'.x► I�C'.�►, C: if H itington Bmli, CY,:..tf 11�tU �`f1'�e atK�aVt ��tb48 g264� ti�ntin n Usa4d�, C.eUt 1 92648 i 1 • 1 1 1041' 13th stx 1 I 1979 . ( L P f2 311 Hi #s,, tali. 942 llth 6onrK 94 Jtxmsphft V1" L ` I Yrdak24-0�61�13 uo� x , stxar.�t 1036 ,11* t ' Mats, C iYi# ; h, C:li# 94.i Uth SUc�wt ; ft� DMOCS4cow 92ti4!' � r'3Rssisw�r S' 1 !i fir. 2".1-14 . . ACC' . 114T Litwr Stet 1Gt2 l.� WrrL]I, ; , ' isw d%# Cs1if , awf !� 11tk �raw�t t 92i 9u"Mi+LR iltarr�t AwKh Cal L ' 9airl4 23.-0"w44 2 ]t 24�fr1-35 I 11U, IA" SWOUt 13372 *mVwt Awe 94a! llth 9tatwM�t Cali "Ysttm, Ctlit 1 tii txx� i 9 1260 92"Al 23 i�12 Z,-052-21 2F#1 �.6 lily, A ULUDI Mrt J ww J Qk�dlSrdn tianiirsma K *quo 1U7 Lain Stro t 1019 12tih A .'mart i 1025 l2th Sty Califlalovicht ftuho col J Hmt qtm Dosch Cal if 24-OS2-14 32 Jo Ka��l'! 1119 L o Street 10225 th John� 915 Ivke ;txwt + H°'°'cfi' OkilfAMUDOM ftochol calif 61ur:tinq�5an Drrs�^ah, C�:St A2f:di1 92646 24•-061-3.1 Ulli* w fit: Mrs H lit Mahout G "ard Sr* Ion 13th Stre t 5191 CRAM 927 'Lakc ,� l�unrtrGrx 6"Ch. , iM u n a irs�uti Ca t 92644 9Q►92.S t � 92"s r 2"52-28 24-Gi1-14 24-061-33 auisr w Ria wr B&th A Cogmr 1026 13th Street 93S I1th t k:+orit+t 1115 Min S�ta�t Hurit.l n i ,C.`a3.1 t tint untm N"dtw Qa'l.it 92� fr40 Murifii.r�brm zap, C.o.1l.! j ' 26+18 92648 1 24-052.22 Zl�i1-1.1 s 2b-a�1-�1 Jow t M1 uar ARW x Ktasarm m wmrcw G Eivamd sr, 1030 13Ui Si xvwt W 1.1t h Sfizwt 927 10th Stiveh. . t ,.tr gt m Aa►+di, Ca1. f r l etauAWAIr A orb. Wif 92649 1 . WnUiVton C fALU 92164s 92640 1 ti t .Mari.MariAn T RWrri PM 79-3 be Foy a Awymidd i !32S It �,+tx'sart. mw lot 1979 (m) .3309 Pim Avw%j e tkr#rq!m 3bsche C3LliL MR-*Mtten Wit, Calif. w 9T64 902" 24-"1n21 t JrZa—M-" 2� 2—�2 Ln�►�irA�,L"�yX� �#m �Stvent + P4i(rZ.filR.i�.�iiDwwid y Janow thxxtitgtM # C' LUf 570 HL"Wa $t"Ld at 206 C m att A 92648 San LsL#10 C r�+o, C ,N,x*ArsytmRwAtf Calif 24-061--22 2 83--QS ANYM4 it. pa=icc at a1 24L� 2-03 '39Q1 1 ►xtlr Awontaro + ks'l I J MOW muc a K&PLsn Lam , CLUf P.O. .f�,� in 209 C3reat Ava um ��iitt l.Kjt7�3 y 11 ti Hm�1 t cau 90807 92648 t 92648 24•-%1 23 2 4-081--06 2"2-04 j Jerry J Ga Ic h RdIAp A lbutw.f.wo ,� E � 939 lotto Stet 918 .10th gt>nwt - Azvjt: xa 'Matti, Calif Ei�rs',.tngtm ►, CC1.if P.O. tic 51 � 9264$ 9260b! 92642 I 24-061-24 4 24-081-07 24-OU-05 Pwl.U Pad C Paataw at al Karl Fritz ticA I 945 loth Strwdt 914 10th Stxtr►t 201 1/2 Croat Avorxn twtirgon IMach, Calif kit c n i, Ca1it~ t,Xtn botcht .C" 92648 92648 92b4s 24--051-25 24-031--1,1 st�yaa r �k Atthlk V Pida> 9 5049 10t h Street 224 C rowt Awwm 737 Lj)w Street L"iti ngt on Bna d',,C&LUf tivarC.i..rgbm : �r C.a l l-ti aryjjqto„y becch, 6311 92 648 92648 92bu 24-081.-01 24-G82--07 mn-t- U Malley art &I JULtus J Itrwaeb AM* *Upxrtiad UA 950 loth Strut 906 loth street. 2361 Nrnre Dom pd Mxtirxlt m Drabm, caw LU ti r t--m rch* C LUf pastes tteeato. Cali 92648 92648 92626 24-MI-02 24- 031-23 24-W2-o8 Ittairt k' hckiwu Lxwvid K im" Li19.#m is [asvl,de 936 loth stx%*t 2*06 Ctvat A MXO 10236 Averse ii►xitingtran Sufi, Caul Huntingta, , Calk South Cato, calm 92b4b 92649 907.80 24-c761-03 2+-061-2 i 24-VR Ewald L NmlUnfi �s C w �t 930 loth :: 216 Crust howan 212 N TWIW 14r+XIW ' tiara drQt= Doodle CAW Wit, CaLLi.i f km 110M Ca13.t 92*48 92648 o t t - ! j tDlMi t H Gi s la r' =1�bp in`StzYuat my 19; 19?'9 tici Win, Calif r. s 926U. 24- 62-16 MCI 2-14 , 122M [R an Lwo : 1 ; 822 rrn*ft:rt Av4twr Matting WAi f 926" 217 ; Vnxkw ood O=P 714 XWAiVilis G trqwt tslx� n Ctie f 924 � 24-092--15 , �d Aase�eal ' p.o. am 697 Alt oLUf 9264B. ; Dg t. CZ trompurtAtim y l 120 go. Sparag Los A less, Calif 50052 Atwo staff hm&Urtmt j