Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrecise Plan of Street Alignment 79-3 - Lake St. between Ind i i979 IN left 7/3 Superior Court �'�•1 ���: -{,, i1e,THE n -� %;TA Ft FCA1.1P►ltNIA 111 And (,V the ('0111111 411 11rnrlct- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH1 CITY CLERK 1'Itt►t1�'t)t�•1�lit.lt'.�'r1i eti Pubt fic He.srine 79-3 .state of t'A11111true r a � f'nUnit ,�f 1 IranYr 1" Rita J. Richter ThAI I Ain ind m all titt,o hertrin a.entumed wa% it citiren„t thr United Swo-,.„err the aKr tit twenty -nr lilr,tr%.and that t tom no A iowty tn. noir inlrrr+trtl in the Att.,-.r enlitirtt matt!:. that t am the principal clerk of the printrt for the Huntington Beach Independent Reviev it nrwr•panrr of rener it cirtvlAtitr•i,(iuhli.hetl in the r'i:v ur Huntington Beach Count' fit Orange And ojech nrw vaiwi it li',hltrhtNl lilt Slit• t�+. diorminatinn t,f h•ral anil intellirrntr of A xrrit-w charm tet, anti which nrw*paper at All tirrirm hrrrin mrnti,inrtl had and still ha• a Ir nA rule•uh.criptiun li>t „t p,ti,inK•u!w rilier., �' �*�q,►,', � rr �'1 and which riew*palwr hn� Warn r�trhlnhiK�, printrd anti pub. rid at rekular intriva!• in the wid CrAu,t) of trance for a 1wriat! rtce+riinl: lint vrur: that thr nwtire, 44 'Allith 111r annrted i• a printed cttp%, I%.N Irvn puhli.hr: in the rt*ulAt and entire tkatir tit %Aid new liliovrr,nnii lust in an> •applrnirnt thrtMif.tun the tiillt,a ing tintr•,t„•wit: June 211 1979 „•„ I t•rrtih tu! d(%tarel undrt p;:iANs 0 lwtlun this the t,►-c,. in[iti trur nrot ct,rtect. t)att leat....,. , Garden Grave eaii �.u•,c 21&ton .,I ,June 7Q+ ,� '+ tiirn,.turr -2 f OF rer.w4„ Cyr 014 REQMJE T FOR CITY C-%W, 4CIL ACTON /a, ,gip James W. Palin Development Services/Planning Submitted by Department Date Prepared y 3U� , 19.L Backup Material Attached M Yoe w Subject PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 79-3 City Administrator's Comments AFPX0VCU )3y C17*y 0)U1r G11. Approve as recommen ti'xy ! CITY CLF- K�� , Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: rrw� .r��.r.ri��rrwrr��zwirrwrw .�.wrrrrn yrrw�i++.++.w�� rv�rr^raw+w�rr�a•w"w..� Attached for your consideration is the Ordinance on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 . A public hearing ', has been held on this Precise Plan by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Prer:ine Plan of Street Alignment No . 79-3 was heard by the Planning Commission on June 5, 1979 and the City Council on July 2 , 1979. The adoption of this Ordinace will precisely align Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Indianapolis Avenue as a 90 ,foot right-of-way. Lake Street is presently designated on the Circulati6n Elament of the General Plan as a Primary Arterial having an ultimate right-of-way of 100 feet. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend that the City Council adept the attached Ordinance for Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 7,9-3 . Respectfully, J e W. alin Director & . , D^,velopment Services Attaclunent•s: Ordinance No. too q9 RECUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIC',N Submitted by .-Jaine s W. Palin Department Development Services/Planning Date Prepared June 22 , 1979 Backup Material Attached (j] Yee fJ No Subject PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-3 A precise street alignment for Lako Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue . City Administrate 's Comment: Approve as recommended. Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source. Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 , a preoi,se plan of street alignment est-.ablishi.ng a ninety (90 ) foot right-of-way for Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue . The right-of-way along this portion of Lake Street at the present time is depicted as a 100-foot right-of-way per the Circulation Element of the Cit; ' s General Flan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the Planning staff recommend that the City Council approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 and direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance reflecting the 90 foot rl: .ht-of_-way. ANALYSIS : Applicant : Initiated by the Department of Development Services Location: Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue Request:- Establish the ultimate right-of-way of the above-mentioned portion of Lake Street as a -90-foot right-of-way vers'uss a 100-foot right-of-way depicted on the Circulation Ele- ment of the City ' s General Plan . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON DUNE 5, 1979 : UN MOTION BY PAONE AND ,:SECOND BY RUSSELL_:PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGN- MENT NO . 79-3 WAS APPPOVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITE' COUNCIL" WITH EXHIBIT D-2 AS , THE RBColg :ENDED STREET SECTION , BY THE FOLLONSNG V07Es AYES:. Higgins3, Russell, Bazi1 , Paone NOBS s' _ Stern, Cohen .r ABSENT: None � ABSTAI Ns Norse P. P .S .A. 79-3 June 22, 1979 Page 2 DISCUSSION: Lake Street has been the subject of a long history of controversy . In the attached staff report a chronology has been included which will outline a number oz significant events relating to make Street since 1976. In 1977 a tentative tract; was approved along the east side of Lake Street north of Adams Avenue . This tentative tract has not been able to record a final map because of the undecided ultimate right-of -way width for Lake Street. In the past several months, two additional tracts have heen submitted to the Planning Department for processing before the Planning Commission that front onto Lake Street. It was essential that a decision be made on the ultimate right-of-way on Lake Street prior to the development of any of the properties located along Lake Street . Based on a recommendation from the Department of Public Works , the, Planning Department pursued a precise plan of street alignment for that portion of Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue. At the Planning Commission hearing held on June 5, 19791 a number of persons addressed the Commission in favor of the proposed 90-foot right-of--way along Lake Street. The speakers all emphasized the im- portance of maintaining the integrity ow the residential neighborhood as it exists without encouraging or channeling beach and commercial traffic through the general area . The existing eucalyptus trees along the east side of Lake Street was a major issue of concern to the Planning Commission relating to Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 . The landscape division of the Department of Public Works submitted a survey conducted on, the trees and their present location in relationship to the elevations of the street at finished grade . The survey concluded that within that portion of bake Street between Indianapolis and Yorktown it =«nul.d be necessary to remove 22 of the existing trees ; howLver , there is a possibility of saving approximately 18 of the existing trees. Both Commissioner Stern and Commissioner Cohen requested that the decision on Lake Street be tabled until the Traffic Model that is presently being conducted for the City identified future traffic volumes along Luke Street . The remaining members of the Planning Com- mission agreed that adequate information and studi.;. ;. have been developed along Lake Street and that any decision made regarding this street would not be premature. The Commission requested that the Planning staff pursue an additional precise plan of street alignment for that portion of Lake Street between Indianapolis Avenue south to either At,lanta 'Avenue or Pacific Coast Highway . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The enviionmr_n ta'I effects of this pro jcct are ' addressed as part of the envirQn:nental , reviow of Neg'tive Declaration No. 79-34 for Tentative Tract 10719 . P.P.S .A. 79--3 June 22 , 1979 Page 3 FUNDING SOURCE : Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider any of the other alternative street widths as, submitted to the Planhir j Conunission on June 5 , 1979. These alternatives range in ultimate right-of-way from 90 feet as selected by the Planning Commission as Exhibit D-2 to 100 and 105 foot rights-of-way . If any of the other alternatives would be selected by the City Council , Precise plan of Street Alignment No. 79--3 would have to be referred back to the Planning Commission with a recommendation from the Council . An alternative course or action relating to the approval o-f this recommendation is to hold back on the preparation of an ordinance For this portion of Lake Street and have one ordinance prepared after hearing the remaining portion of Lake Street (Precise Plan cf Street Alignment No . 79-4 , scheduled for Planning Commir'�ion hearing on July 3 , 1979 ) . SUPPORTI.N INFOR?4AT7ON: 1 . Area Map 2. Planning Commission staff report dated June 5 , 1979 Respectfully submitted, v James W. ?alin Acting Planning Director JWP:SMB: &L 'It�tlPtpq pkxvi1'ySdepartment I- eport TO: planning Commission FROM: Dnvelopment Services/Planning DATE: June 5 , 1979 SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NU. 79-3 (IAXE STREET) 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: 1 . Open the public hearing and accept testimony from those property owners notified who wish to speak in regard to Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 . 2 . Continue the public hearing open to allow staff to readvertise to incorporate Lake Street from Indianapolis Avenv-,; south to Atlanta Avenue into this precise plan. 3. Instruct staff to set and readvertise the n`v, heciri.ng after the Traffic I•Iodel has been completed and is in workable form to permit analysis of the dispersion of traffic within this area of the City. 2 . 0 GENERAL INF'ORMATI ON : Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 was set for public hearing to red�.A.ce the ultimate width of Lake Street from the 100 feet_ currently existing on the Circulation Element to a 90-foot section to be developed within the existing rights-of-way from Yorktown to Atlanta Avenue . This action was pursuant to a memorandum dated March 27, 1979 , from the Director of Public Works. However, since that date the Department of Public Works has indicated that this reduction would be premature and that anticipated traffic counts for ultimate development would require a greater width on Lake Street. The Director of Public Works , the Traffic Engineer, and representa- tives from the Fire and Planning Departments linve met to discuss alternative sections drafted for the ultimate constructed width of Lake Street. Based upon the JlII; traffic study previouslf submitted , it was a consensus that a reduction of Luke Street at this time would indeed be premature, even though the northerly portion of, Lake between Yorktown and Garfield Avenues has been deleted from the Circulation Element and the City Council is considering the design and realignment of the ;ntersection of Lake and Atlanta. The,, dis- cussion pointed out the need for parking on both sides of Lake Street as well as for a 5-foot bike lane and a median left turn pocket at, all cross street intersections . with this design , had with preserva- tion of the 15-foot parkway on the west side of Lake, north-south P . P . S .A . 79-?: June 5 , 197« Page 2 traffic would be lim01ted to a sijjgle traffic lane in each direction. The trees were also a Fart. of the discussion and we were informed by Mr . 2ambory that his street: tren superintendent is putting together a display on all trees along the cast side of Lake to show crown elevation and health condition in order to assess which trees can be saved. In summary, the discussion led t•he staff to a consensus that the 15 , 000 to 16 , 000 cars per clay ultimately expected oil Hake, the parking for the residential a ne►s on both sides of the street , and the bicycle lanes on each side could not be accommodated in the 90-foot right-of--way as advertised and that the existing 100 feet of right-of-way could also be deficient, and that more updated informa- tion would be necessary for a final determination an street width There fore , the departments a-.Ir.eed that the Traffic Model is necessary and alternative intensities c, 1,►nd use in they downtown area must be analyzed to provide ultimate counts on which to base a determination of the width of Lake Street . When Lake Street was previously before the Planning Commission for possible widening to 1004• f:orit width, it was anticipated that in the vicinity of the Edison substation such alignment would be offset westerly with a modified section to accommodate flow at that location. Ifbwev'or , it should be noted at this time , regardless of whether the ?""N Ultimate decision is for retaining the existing 90-foot: right-of-way or pursuing the 100-foot: as shown on the Circulation Element, no modification is being proposed to any properties along the westerly side of the Lake alignment , either to the existing right-of-way line or to thn existing parkway width , which is currently 15 feet . Since the prior review and determination on the width of Lake Street , the Department of Public Works has drafted a number of alternative sec- tions to accommodate a single travel lane in each direction within the 90-foot , as well as two travel lanes in each direction within both the 90-foot and the 100-foot width as shown on the Circulation Element. The two travel lanes in each direction upon the existing 90-foot width would eliminate the parking which is customary at: curb for residential development . As the property owners to the west of Lake Street have had this use for years and existing approved maps on the east, as well as those pending approval by the Planning Com- mission , are served by a l l.ey access only , parking would be very desirable, iE not absolutely necessary , for such residential develop- ment . For this reason , the staff is recommnending that the Planning Commission not pursue a reduction less than the 100--foot required by the Circulation Element:. 2 . 1 Hist�o��r�y : Attached is the most recent staff- report dated June 22 , 1978 wFiREF Fontains a chronological list of events leading up to this meeting , as well as additional information on the Lake Street align- ment . /�■� P .P.S .A. 79-3 June 5 , 1979 Page 3 On June 22 , 1978 , the. Commi nsiori cstablished a priority list for a number of street n1terat ions for the downtown and ci vi canter areas, to resolve the circuLation and to establish now alignments for this area of the city . Action on that priority list follow, : 1 . First Pr iorit. Revocation of PPSA 70-4 ( tile Atlanta/Lake l.nterseet o-n) has been acted on by the City Council . Second item oil this first priority was the revocation of the nc:l.aware Street extension (I111SA 70-2 ), alsoacted on by the City Council. 2 . Second Priority : Gothard Street r. f.al ignment from E'l.lis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue (PPSA 76-6C) . This was recently acted on by the Planning Conunis.ion as Precise Pian of Street Alignment too. 79-.1 , which is currently awat:ing a legal description from the Department of Public WorE;s for transmittal to the City Council . 3. Third Priority: Lake Street. Extension (PPSA 76-6A) . This was (1—cleted. by City Council action in 1979 by Circulation Amendment No . 79-1©. Another portion of this third priority , abandonment of t-lain Street between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-61)) is no longer valid . 4 . Fourth Prinrit The closure of Main at 17th Street (PPSA 76-6 ) is current y in study . Closure of 1.7th at Utica and Yorktown le "`` between Delaware and Clay (PPSA 76--1A and 13) pare currently under Public Works study. As can be seen by this priority list , many of those priorities estab- lished by the Planning Commission to resolve the circulation have been accomplished , with few decisions remaining . liowever, we have reached a very critical paint in tile overall circulation for this area of the City and we cannot emphasize enough the need for the Traffic Model. as a tool tur trriffic analysis . 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The environmental effects of this project are addressed as part of the environmental review of Negative Declaration No . 79-34 for Tentative 'Tract 10719 . 4 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: based on theabove information and the information in the attached rtaff report , it is the consensus of the staff that this precise plan 'of street alignment: be continued to a date following submittal, to the City of a Traffic Model to analyze the disperiion of traffic within this area of the City . . The continuation w111 also allow the staff to readvertise a new public hearing for the total length of Luke Street, as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 was inad- vertently advertised to reduce only the section between Indianapolis and Yorktown when in fact the alignment sho«ld have been set From Atlanta to Yorktown. 1; P .P .S.l►. 79- 3 June 5, 1979 Page 4 4 .1 Alternative Action : Table action indefinitely , which would require that all development on the east: sides of L;iike Street dedicate property at a 55-foot offset centerline to accommodate the 100 foot, primary width as designated on the Circulation Element. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Exhibits A , C, q1 , 02 , D3 2 . Staff Report dated June 22 , 1979 3 . Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes , June 22 , 1978 JWP f .�, . A5� 55' 1 a r 30.. .w.. _ 4 7' .• ` , m .aaKri 01KC WAYLL TA A•[L LCUIAN TAAYFL TgA.ft �Eerl: .tad j lA►rE I.S�rE LMIE LAfjE LOFT LANE LANC I L LAt1E , I { I 74. '• •3 5 t �.� EXHIBIT A 15' 30• 52• e' i ' IWIK �PIKF. TRAVEL TFRU EL ►.gMlArr TOVULL i MArtL 4f1tr,E !PARK i N ric, laYrE I ENE 11.X LEF; I LANE I LANE LA►rE 11rG �� LA? , Tlxw L►r I LANE W al po p Room r ,— EXHIBIT G LAKE STREET 8 ''.�•• i mlIK' INN IRAYEL IRAW ►RAUYEL 7116el.`if:w5c�. Lx Ifi(i LAW LANELWIE LAVE t,t'iE LAN E 0 w w • •., EXHIBIT 45 .... 05' �_. 30._.. . . __.. 30 cr Q' 5'_ 1' 1 ,�' ' F-I �K' PIKE TRAVEL Mir TTU 4WEL 'Ulr' pan-K• 1 '+ W� iliG L-VIE Law MEDIAN L.ltiE !LAhE'mr. LANE L EFT }LANE i �V) 3 I N # # W LaTE ! � , EXHIBIT D 2 90 {..,. -'t p 15._ _..,_ 30' ., 3 o' �y 15' ai -10 I KElIAArfL iH.SVEL 1mwU7ED y' :ll TN.1YEl.LE31KF� �fC 1- r L1LNE LANE IWIDIAN L 4HE L A?W WJE; {W LEFT TU,1N LARE q EXHIBIT D 3 LAKE STREET huntingW be nx . It FTO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: June 22 , 1978 SUBJECT: PHASING OF PRECISE PLANS OF STREET ALIGNMENT (MAKE STREET) 1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION : 1. Reaffirm policy direction established by the current Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways 2. Establish a prioritization of Precise Plans of Street Alignment to implement the Circulation Plan . 3 . Adopt a tentative time schedule for considavation of individual precise plans . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This report is intended to provide an overview of several Precise Plans of Street Alignment that have bnon proposed in order to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan . These include several inter- related proposals centered in the Downtown/Civic Center area , which have ' been the subject of considerable discussion by the Planning Commission over the past several years. The following are the major Precise Plans involved (see location' map) : 1. The narther)y extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue (PPSA 76-6A) 2. The widening of Lake Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Yorktown Avenue (PPSA 76-6B) , 3 . The realignment of Gothard Street from Ellis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue using the existing right-of-way of Crystal Street and Main Street (PPSA 76-6C) , 4 . The vacation of Main Street between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6D) ` 5 . The closure of. Main StL'eet at Seventeenth Street (PPSA 76-6D) , 6. The closure of Seventeenth at Utica and at Yorktown (PPSA 76--1B) , 7. The vacation of Seventeenth Street between Delaware and Clay (PPSA 76-IA, , 8. The realignment of Atlanta Avenue and Lake Street at their intev- seetion, including the alignment of Atlanta between Lake and Beach "\ Boulevard (PPSA 70-4 , PPSA 77--3 ) . 9 . The southerly extension of Delaware Street between Frankfort Avenues and Pacific Coast Highway (P@SA 70-2 and 70--3 ) . t Because of development pressure in some of the areas affected by these alignments, it is necessary in the near future to prioritize the Precise Plans and establish a tentative schedule for their consideration by the Planning Corunission. The information contained herein should provide a starting point for these tasks . 3. 0 SU14MRY OF ISSUES : Since this report is intended to provide an overall. perspective on a large number of proposals, the discussion of issues is limited basically to the following : (1.) The objective or purpose behind the proposal , primarily from a traffic and circulation standpoint, (2) The interrelationships of the proposals with each other , and the appropriate phasing of individual Precise Plana. r Among the other issues mentioned briefly in regard to some of the proposals v.re the impact of current development activity, community response , need for relocation , and the cost of the project. These will be brought out in Mn siderably more detail when the Commission begins consideration of the individual plans . 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : An environmental impact report (EIR 76-5) was prepared in October, 1976 covering Precise Plans of Street Alignment No. 76-6 A through E. This report was adopted on December 6 , 1976 with the sections pertaining to the widening of Lake Street (PPSA 76-6D) deleted . It is felt that additional environmental documentation will be necessary regarding several cf the Precise Plans discussed in this report . 00ki. 5.0 ANALYSIZ t . Adoption of Precise Plans of Street Alignment is p g provided for under State Planning Law in order to carry out the goals and policies contained in the General Plan in an orderly and consistent manner. In the cases of the Precise Plans discussed herein , the major purpose is to implement the str�)et pattern depicters in the currant Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways adopted as part of the Circulation Element in December , 1976 . Some of the proposed alignments, including the Lake Street extension, have been master planned for a much longer time . overall policy direction was established by General Plan •`.mendment 76-1A, adopted in March, 1976, which provided the .impetus for moat of the precise Plans now under consideration . The major thrust of the amendments to the Circulation Plan was to improve access to the Downtown/Beach area by providing several alternative north/ south arterials, necessitated by the deletion of the proposed Route 39 (Beach Boulevard) Freeway. Another major goal was the de-emphasis of Main Street as a major traffic carrier .in the Downtown by rerouting traffic onto Seventeenth , Lake, and Delaware Streets and reducing Main Street to local stret status. f-, summary of the important events since the adoption of CPA 76-3,A is given below. 5 . 1 Chronology June 1 , 1976 PPSA 76-- 1A and B (Closure of Seventeenth at Yorkto%(;i and between Clay and Delaware) was tabled by the Planning e4*N Commission so that it could be considered concurrently with the other Precise Plans in the area (PPSA 76-G A through E) . August: 31, 1976 .Staff presented a report on the proposed alignments (PPSA 76-1 and 76-6 ) to the Planning Commission, and began preparation of an Environmental Impact Report . The Commission at this time concurred with the alternative alignments recommended by staff . December 6 , 1976 The City Council approved EIR 76--5 covering all of the proposed alignments with the exception of PPSA 76-6D (Lake Street widening from Yorntown to Paci, ic Coast Highway) . The EIR incorporated a traffic iripact analysis prepared for the City by R .G .B. Engineering , Inc. which discussed the impacts of the proposed alignments . January 25 , 1977 The first of three Planning Commission study sessions was held, for the purpose of informally discussing the proposals and obtaining public input. February 23 , 1977 Second planning Coranission study session. The Commission directed staff to delete PPSA 76-6E (Huntington Street extension to Fllis ) from furthez consideration, to set PPSA 76-6D (Park and Pine Streets cul-de-sacs) for public hearing , and to analyze several alternatives to the proposed Lake Street alignment, including elimination of both Lake and Main from the Circulation Plan. March 29, 1977 Third Planning Commission study session. Thu Commission directed staff to remove the Lake Street extension and widening (PPSA 76--6A and B from further consideration, to set the portion of .PPSA 76--6C from Ellis to Garfield for public hearing, and to prepare revised recommend- ations for PPSA 76-1 A and B and the remainder of PPSA 76••6C for a study session . May 30 1977 The public hearing on PPSA 76--6C Main Street Realign- ment from Ellis to Garfield) and PPSA 76-6D (Park and Pine: Streets) was tabled to allow for additional notifi- cation of affected residents . May 25, 1977 In a communication to the Planning Commission , four Department Heads (Hartge , Picard , Robitaille, Moorehouse) requested that the Lake Street extension and widening be reopened for discussion. June 7 , 1977 PPSA 76-6D (closure of Park and Pine Streets ) approved by the Planning Commission. Staff was also directed to set the closure of Main Street at Seventeenth for public hearing , in response to a petition from area residents . July 12 , 1977 In response to the Department Neads ' request , the Com- mission reopened discussion of PPSA 76-6 A and 8. Con- sensus was reached that a public hearing should be held on the Lake Street extension and widening. At the same meeting , the Commission directed staff to begin processinge the revocation of PPSA 70-4 (Atlanta Avenue , Lake Street , and Orange Avenue at their intersection ) and to prepare a set of alternative alignments for a new Precise Plan. July 17 , 1977 The City Council adopted PPSA 76-6D for the closure of Park and Pine Streets . August 11 , 1977 Staff presented five alternatives for the alignment of Atlanta and Lake to the Planning Commission. Staff was directed to set the revocation of PPSA 70-4 for public hearing and to prepare a Precise Plan based on Alternative 5 to replace the old alignment . Sep. 29, 1977 The Planning Commission approved the revocation of PPSA 70--4 and directed staff to pursue both Alternatives 4 and 5 for a new alignment . December 20, 1977 PPSA 77-3 (Atlanta/Lake Alternatives 4 and 5 ) was tabled indefinitely so that it could be considered in conjunction with the Lake Street extension and widening. May 2 , 1978 The Planning Commission adopted a Resolution of Intent to revoke Portion 3 of PPSA 70-4 which provides for a direct connection between Atlanta Avenue and Orange Avenue. Consideration of this revocation was subsequently postponed until July 5 to allow the Commission to consider the prop^ in the context of all the other Precise Plans in the areal . Also, pending before the Commission are resolutions of in- tention to revoke PPSA 70-2 (Delaware St. extenaion from Frankfort to Atlanta) and to adopt a Precise Plan for Atlanta between Beach and Huntington. 1 ' 5. 2 Lake Street Extension from Yorktown to Garfield (PPSA 76-6AI el.;2. 1 general Information This proposed alignment has been a part of the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways since at least the early 1960 ' s . The basic purpose behind the extension is to provide a north-south arterial highway as an alternative to Beach Boulevard between Five Points and the Beach. A second major objective is to relieve the adverse impacts caused by the use of Main St.eet as a beach access route . The extension of Lake Street coupled with the diversion of traffic from Main St. onto Seventeenth St. would effectively allevi-, ate the impacts in the residential neighborhood along Main St. The alignment proposed in PPSA 76-6A provided for a primary arterial highway with a 100 foot right-of-way , generally corresponding to the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way . A number of variations on the basic proposal were developed , in response to the desire to preserve the railroad right-of-way and to minimize the impacts can hill located just north of Yorktown and west of the railroad . 5. 2. 2 Traffic Analysis The projected traffic volume on the Lake Street extension according to the RGb Engineering study, would be 27 ,000 ADT. The extension would result in an increase in traffic on Lake Street south of Yorktown to approximately 25 , 000 ADT at ultimate development. This would be compensated by a reduction in traffic on Main Street, particularly if certain other Precise Plans (PPSA 76-6C and D) were implemented as well . Conversely , failure to provide the extension of Lake Street :;ill result in a further increase in Main Street traffic, estimated -t% 23 , 000 ADT between 17th and 14th and 19, 000 ADT from 14th to 5th Street . These volumes exceed the present and projected capacity of Main Street and will result an adverse noise and safety impacts as well as traffic delays . A further obi -+ctive of this proposal in conjunction with the Gothard Street realignment is the elimination of the five-way intersection . of Gothard , Main, and Garfield . The implementation of these Precise Plans would significantly increase the efficiency and safety of this intersection . 5. 2 . 3 Other Issues During previous discussions regarding the proposal , considerable opposition developed from residents along Lake Street because of the Increased traffic that would result. To put this issue in perspec- tive, it should be understood that the total traffic in the corridor between Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest is independent of the street pattern in this area . The goal of the City should be to allocate this traffic along the available streets which are best able to accommodate it without undue impacts . In the view of the City ' s traffic consultant, Lake Street is better able Co handle the projected traffic than Main Street (because of its limited width .?'N and residential character) or Delaware Street because it does not extend to 'Pacific Coast flighway. Lake Street has a relatively .limited �.*ount of residential frontage, and could be developed as an arterial with the least amount of disruption to the City of airy of the alter- natives. Another potential issues is Lite effect of the extension of Lake on the iMmmercial center at Main and Yorktown . The diversion of traffic onto Lake will tend to reduce the traffic on thia section of main and adversely affect the viability of this center . This impact will be mitigated to some extent by increased volumes on Main due to the Gothard Street realignment (estimated at 21 , 000 ADT) and projected increases in volumes on Yorktown (13 , 000 ) and Golden- west (33 , 000) . 5 . 2 . 4 Priority The Lake Street extension is in effect the central proposal on which several of the other Precise Plans hinge . Decisions regarding the extension will have considerable impact on the Gothard Realignment, Main Street diversion, and the Atlanta/Lake alternatives. Consequently, staff feel that it is important to establish a direction on this pro- posal before proceeding on the other alignments under consideration. 5 . 3 Lake Street Widening from Yorktown to Pacific Coast Highway (PPSA 76-6B) 5. 3 . 1 General Information Lake Street is currently designated as a primary arterial , for which the standard right-of--way width would be 100 feet . The right-of-way at preseriL• is 90 feet wide for most of its length between Yorktown and Pacific Coast Highway, with 45 feet on either side of the center- line. PPSA 76-6n proposed to increase this width to 106 feet, with the additional right-of--way coming entirely from the east side of the^ street , which is largely vacant. To accomplish this widening between 10th Street and tfartford Avenue, however. , would require the relocation of a portion of the facilities at the Southern California Edison Nave Substation and the Lake Street Fire Station . The Precise Plan there- fore proposed to curve the alignment to the west and reduce the width to lower the implementation cost of the project. In the absence of the Precise Plan , dedication along the east side of Lake would be to a width of 100 feet San additional ten feet) . A number of subdivision maps have been submitted and approved by the City along Lake Street providing for varying amounts of street dedi- cation. one of these (TT 9234 - Huntington Beach Company) has ex- pired a second (TT 9388--Li;idborg) was denied by the Coastal Com- mission , and a third is currently under consideration by the Plan- ning Commission . 5 . 3 . 2 Traffic Analysis Existing traffic volume, on Lake Street range from 2900 to 3900 ADT. In the event Lake Street is not extended to Garfield , these volumes can be rexpected to increase substantiall,► at ultimate development , but will not exceed the capacity of the street as it presently exists . If Lake is extended, however, the projected traffic volume is estimated at 25, 000 ADT at ultimate development. This volume would retluire that Lake be improved to primary arterial status , with four tra`tfic lanes and a median. The right-of-way would also in- clude a parking lane un the west side (and possibly both sides) and bike lanes on either side . Tiie parking lane on the east side may not be necessary since development in this area would generally take access from an Alley along the Pacific Electric right-of-way rather than on Lake Street. 5. 3. 3 Priority Since dedication to a width of 100 ft. is possible even without a Precise plan , this proposal is not felt: to have as much immediate justification as most of: the other Precise Plans under discussion . Staff therefore feels that the City should simply continue to require dedication on the east side of, Lake of 55 ft . as development occurs . A Precise Plan may, however, be necessary in the long term to acquire property in the area between loth and Hartford which is already developed . 5 . 4 Realignment" of Gothard Street from Ellis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue (PPSA b bC 5 . 4 . 1 General Information PPSA 76--6C proposes to realign Gothard Street beginning at Ellis Avenue, curving westerly to intersect with the existing right-of-way of Crystal Street. Utilizing this right-of-way, Gothard would con- tinue south to intersect Mein Street between Clay and Yorktown . The existing Gothard right--of-way between Ellis and the Garfield/Main intersection would be vacated under this proposal . If implemented in conjunction with the Lake Street extension, the portion of Main 1 Street between Garfield and its intersection with the realigned Gothard Street would be either abandoned or reduced to local street standards . one alternative would be to curve Main Street into Gothard at the existing Clay/Crystal intersection . The objectives of this realignment would be : (1) to create a viable north/south .arterial composed of Gothard , Main , and Seventeenth Street (in conjunction with other precise Plans to divert traffic from the downtown portion of Main St . ) and (2) to eliminate the five-way intersection at Main and Garfield. The Circulation Plan designate, the Gothard realignment as a secondary arterial (go ' right-of-way) from Ellis to Gaarfield and a primary arterial from that point south . The existing Crystal Street right- of--way is 60 feet wide . Therefore , dedication of an additional ten feet of right-of-way on each side would be required . This proposal would also require :he purchase of right-of.-way between Crystal. and Ellis , and between Clay and existing Mein Street. 5. 4. x Traffic Analysis The existing traffic volume on the portion of r.*-thar'd to be realigned is 41200 ADT. This traffic would all uti.liza the realigned street section at least from Ellis to Garfield. Ult;.mate traffic volume on this section is estimated 19, 000 ADT. The projection for the portion between Garfield and Yorktown is 21, 000-23, OQ0 ADT. These volumes can be accommodated by the street widths proposed in PPSA 76-6C. Elimination of the Five way intersection at !lain and Garfield will substantially redune traffic delays and improve safety conditions in this area , 5. 4. 3 other Issues This Precise Plan is closely related to the Planning Department ' s Garfield-Goldenwest ,Study, which will be discussed at an upcoming study session. Decisions made regarding the Gothard realignment will have a major influence on what land use options are available in this area . Staff feels that the circulation issues should be re- solved prior to land use decisions being made. The Gothard realignment is interrelated with the Lake Street extension, the Main Street abandonment (PPSA 76-6D) and the diversion of Main Street traffic to Seventeenth . rn particular, if Lake Street, is not extended and Main Street continues to serge as a primary arterial , the design of the intersection of roLhard and Mein may need to be altered to favor Main Street traffic over Gothard . 5 . 4 . 4 Priority In terms of immediate usefulness and ease of implementation, staff feels that this Precise Plan should be given a high priority. How- ever , since some of the specific details of the realignment depend on whether or not Lake Street is to be extended , policy direction regard;, Lake should be established prior to initiating the Precise Plan, 5. 5 Vacation of Main Street between Garfield and Yorktown and the Closure of Main Street at Seventeenth (PPSA 76-6D) . 5. 5. 1 General Information : PPSA 76-6D , in conjunction with the Lake extension and Gothard realign- menu , Is intended to complete tho deemphasis of Main Street , as a downtown/beach access route. The proposal involves complete abandon- ment of the sections of Main Street between Garfield and ifolly Street and from Clay to the i:ealigned Gothard Street. The section between Holly and Clay would be retained for local circulation purposes, but reduced to half its present width. It nay be possible to trade some of the abandoned right-of-way for land required for the Gothard realignment. The diversion of traffic from Main to Seventeenth could be accomplished either by complete closure of Main or by partial closure and channel- ixation of traffic. The latter would probably be preferable due to the need for emergency vehicle access and local circulation. O 5 . 5. 2 Traffic Analysis Main Street between Garfield and Yorktown presently carries about 13 , 000 vehicles per day. From Yorktown to Fourteenth the volume is 14 , 200 ADT, and the traffic gradually tapers off from that point south. 'These volumes could be expected to increase substantially if the present circulation pattern is retained , and will far exceed the planned capacity of portions of Main Street. Completion of the Lake Street- extension will divert some of this volume but the Gothard realignment may offset this reduction to some extent. The diversion of traffic onto Seventeenth would reduce traffic, noise and safety impacts on the lower part of Main , but will cause some in- crease in traffic on Seventeenth . The projected traffic volume is estimated at 16 , 000 , easily accommodated by the present 90 foot right- of-way on Seventeenth . If Lake is extended , the portion or Main between Garfield and Yorktown will no longer be necessary for arterial street purposes, since all non-local traffic would utilize lake. If Lake were not extended , the abandonment would not be feasible and the street would continue to serve as a beach access route. In that event, the intersection of Gothard and Main at Clay would have to be designed to facilitate Main Street traffic . 5 , 5 . 3 Other Issues Like the Gothard realignment , this proposal will influence land use decisions in t•he Garfield/Golderwest area , and should be acted on prior to those decisions bein4 made. Abandonment of Main Street could provide greater opportunities for planned developments in this area , for example. The closure of Main at Seventeenth will have a positive impact on the :)eighborhood around Lake Park , because of substantially reduced traffi ._- i:-�wever , the provision of limited local access and access for emergenc} vehicles may be important issues regarding this proposal . The potential increase in traffic on Scventeenth may result in opposi- tion from residents in that area . However , as has been noted , Seventeenth .is far better able to handle projected volumes than is Main Street , due to its greater width. 5. 5. 4 Priority The abandonment of tlai.n should be considered in conjunction with the Gothard realignment , both dependent on Lhe direction established re- garding Lake Street . The diversion of Main at Seventeenth is not felt to be as necessary in the short term as the other proposals , and can be delayed for they time being. if Main continues to function as , an arterial and volumes increase, there will be increased justification for the diversion . Interim measures could be con- sidered to direct t-xaffic onto Seventeenth by means of striping and signalization . 5. 6 Closure of Seventeenth at Utica and Yorktown , .-ind the Vacation of Seventeenth between Delaware and Clad (PPSA 76-1 A S B ) 5.6. 1 General Information These measures are intended to reduce the utilization of Seventeenth Street between Main and Garfield . Since Seventeenth runs diagonally in this area, its use results in traffic conflicts at intersections with other streets , particularly at Main and at Yorktown/Fake . This Precise Plan would eliminate the five- way intersections at %lai.n Street and Yorktown , and discourage traffic from utilizing Seventeenth by interrupting the flow at Delaware Street . The objective would be to reduce Seventeenth to local street status as intended by the Circulation Flan . The section between Utica and Yorktown would be accessed via Pine Street , . and used pria:arily for. access ::o and from the Civic Center. These actions are not expected to result in any significant disruption of existing travel patterns, and would improve considerably the efficiency and safety of several intersections. 5 . 6 . 2 Priority PPSA 76-1 A and B are •,iot directly related to any of the other proposed alignments under consideration , and can therefore be initiated at any time. In the opinion of Staff , these measures should t be assigned a relatively low priority . ' 5. 7 Realignment of Atlanta Avenue and take Street at Their Intersection z (PPSA 70-4 r PPSA 77-3) '- 5 . 7. 1 General information PPSA 70-4 , which was adopted in early 1971. and is still in effect, provides for the direct connection of Atlanta Avenue to major arterial ) with a one-way couplet composed of. Orange avenue and Olive Avenue . This configuration was in conformance with the Circulation Plan in effect at that time , and was intended to improve east/west circulation in the downtown area (this is still an important objective of the Circulation Plan) . Since the adoption of PPSA 70-40 several circumstances have changed: (1 ) The Orange-Olive couplet has been deleted from the Circulation Plans (2 ) Traffic studies have shown that major arterial status for Atlanta Avenue is not necessary to handle projectuld volumes ; and (3) Property owners in this area have expressed the desire to develop property presently encumbered by the Precise Plan . Since PPSA 70-4 no longer reflects current circulation plans , proceedings to revoke the alignment have been initiated. In the fall of 1977 , the PlannAng Staff developed five now alternative ailignraent^ some of which connected Atlanta directly with, Orange Avenue. (a secondary arterial) Consideration of the revocation and the new alignment has been postponed until they could be discussed in the context of the Lake Street Precise Plans. ... .✓ 7.2 Traffic Analysis The traffic volume on Atlanta Avenue is currently about 5400 ADT , and is projected to be approximately 20 , 000 ADT at ultimate develop- ment . This volume can easily be accommodated by a primary arterial wiy.'i a 100 ' right-of-way (present width is 601 ) . The main traffic consideration regarding this Precise Plan is the intersection configuration aL Atlanta and Lake. The present offset intersection requires traffic moving on orange and Atlanta to jog dawn Lake Street for a •ihor.t distance. As volumes .increase on these streets this configuration will become increasingly unsatisfactory. One way to resolve the problem is to awing Atlanta north to intersect Lake opposite from Orange . This would clearly improve east/west circulation , but would involve substantial costs in terms of acquistion and relocation . A second alternative involves curving Atlanta south into the existing Lake Street right--of-way and bringing Lake Street into Atlanta in a "T" intersection on the north . This would deeinphr,;6ize the use of Lake Street as well as adversely impact downtown access . !However , it would provide additional beach access via Beacn Boulevard and Atlanta, and might be the best option available its the event Lake Street is not extended to he north . 5 . 7. 3 Other Issues The proposed Atlanta alignments (atid PPSA 70--4 ) all involve impacts of varying degree on properties on both sides of Atlanta . PPSA 70-4 , if implemented immediately , would require the relocation of several residences at great cost to the City . The impacts of the new alternatives are not as severe , but would still involve substantial relocation . However , traffic volumes will not be sufficient to necessitate the realignment in the short term . Therefore, the relocation impacts can be mitigated by adopting a Precise Plan and acquiring the needed right-of-way gradually through dedication . As mentioned previously , the alternative configurations proposed for the Atlanta/Lake intersection are interrelated with the Lake Street extension. If Lake is to become a primary teach access route (with the extension.) , the intersection should be designed to favor Lane Street traffic over Atlanta and Orange . :if not, Atlanta would become relatively more important. 5. 7. 4 Priority Because of the development pressure in the area , the inappropriateness of the existing Precise Plan, and the fact that a Resoultion of Intent has already been adopted by the Commission, Staff feels that this Precise Plan should have a high priority. Rather than revoke only Portion 3 of PPSA 70-4 , as proposed in the Resolution of . Intent, Staff suggests that a new alignment be selected from the five alternatives previously prepared and analyzed by staff. The new Precise Plan can then be adootee- car=wrently with the revocation of the entire PPSA 70-4 alignamt. 5. 8 Extension of Delaware Street between Frank`'art Avenue and Pacific coast` Hig wa-Y _(PPSA 70-2 and PPSA 0-3) 5 . 8 . 1 General Information The purpose of thin alignment is to make Delaware a viable north/south arterial and alternative beach access route , thereby relieving pressure on Beach Boulevard and Lake Street. . PPSA '10-20 adopted in July , 1970, provides for Delaware to proceed wouth from Frankfort to Atlanta , widening from 80 feat to 100 feet . PPSA 70-3 extends Delaware sough from that point , curving westerly Lo intersect Pacific Coast Highway utilizing a portion of the existing Huntington Street right-of-way. The alignment would be 100 feet in width . These two Precise Plans are not in conformance with the existing Circulation Plan, which designates Delaware as a secondary arterial (projected traffic volumes do no` justify a primary ) . In addition , development activity on both sides of Atlanta Avenue has brottght out the need to reevaluate these Precise Plans in light of revised City policy . Tentative Tract 9580 (11 6 Ti Builders) , located on the southwest: corner of Atlanta and Reach, depicts an alignment from Delaware which is 80 feet wide rather than logy reet . At the time the Tentative Map was approved , it was pointed out that prior to recordation of the Final Map it would be necessary to revoke PPSA 70-4 . The intention was to adopt a new Precisc: Man which conformed to the Circulation Plan and the alignment shown on the Tentative Map. This tract is currently :ender appeal to the State Coastal Commission . Tentative Tract 10248 (Ayres) , located an the north side of Atlanta , also depicts an 80 foot alignment for Delaware which conforms to the alignment shown on T. T. 9580 . A condition of approval recommended by S':aff is that PPSA 70-2 be revoked prier to recordation of the Final Map. If the Precise Plan is revoked and the tract approved # there will be no nee:s to adopt a new Precise Plan for. Delaware north of Atlanta . 5 . 8 . 2 Traffic Ana_ psis Traffic projections for the Delaware extension range from 4 , 250 to 8 , 000 north of Atlanta and from 10 , 500 to 11 ,000 south to Pacific Coast Highway in the short term , voumes north of Atlanta should be less than indicated by these projections. probably less than 5 ,000) . The connection between Atlanta and Pacific Coast highway , while not necessary at this time , will become more important as :additional development occurs . This will be especially true if Lake Street is not extended, since Delaware would then be more important for north- south circulation.. , particularly during peak per. iods . 5 . 3 . 3 Other Issues As is the case with the Atlanta/Lake alignment , the extension of Delaware south of Atlanta would involve substantial relocation issues . The alignment impacts an existing mobile home park and would require relocation of a large number of units if implemented in the short to^ Since there is no immediate need for the connection, the Precise Plan is best viewed as a long range objective of the City. 8 , S Priority Due to the current development activity on Atlanta , the revocation of PPSA 70-2 and 70-3 should be given a high priority. A Resolution of Intent for the revocation of PPSA 70-2 has alregdy been prepared in conjunction with Tentative Tract 10248 , which is pending before the _-, Planning Commission , 6 . 0 RECOMMENDATIONS: Because of the interrelationships among the various proposals under discussion; - ; Staff suggests that the Planning Commission First reiterate the .policy direction established by General Plan Amendment 76-1A and indicated in the current Circulation Plan , and adopt the following general phasing of the individual Precise Plans : (1) First Priority - Atlanta/Lake! (revocation of PPSA 70-4 , consideration of new alterna- tive alignments) . - Delaware Extension (revocation of PPSA 70-2 and possibly 70--3 ) . (2) Second Priority - Gothard Realignment from Ellis to Yorktown (PPSA 76-6C) (3) Third Priority - Lake Street Extension (PPSA 76-6A) . - Main Street Abandonment between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6D) . (4) Fourth Priority - Closure of Main at Seventeenth (PPSA 76-6D) - Closure of Seventeenth at Utica and Yorktown and between Delaware and Clay (PPSA 76-1 and D) . - Lake Street Widening (PPSA '16-6B) . Staff also recommends that the Commission direct the initiation c;f the Precise Plans .listed under (1) and (2 ) above , beginning with the necessary Resolutions of Intention and environmental documentation. BD/s Attachments: Location Maps 2. Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways 3. 6xiating Traffic Volume Map f 7,11 cr-c I 141"4, ago 41. 1P� 'Y\fie. r E'YSA .7&"A U � p1'SA 76.4 A � � _ �.r�'I,\,,��j' cr•t � I! t r / F `�`, _�V' - ' 1 _...a.._.... }1 • Ll _ . /, ..K+ I t(i r�4•,.��•)1� �'l r�.��•:• (. it 1 11 f�,~'� ti'�r�1 1 ��_. i• \. 1 . " f��� �1 +• ...�, � � f � �1 a'���IK�+ "�►� t'i • �.tf+Ij. 'f 1I.yM11�� ( " riA}- "� FrSA 76-1 A -r- j• • '';,_.'/ ,{71i .":. " .. J( ' ,. ;•`�> t lr '' ( `�Ulr')� �� . li r ► . _ i.y.>', Cwx:�:'>t t��'tr�?1 � ��'!"��; 1 �. _.._.-1 �___ ��d� _l.lt ..� .f4 .. �;rri1.'�U.�i3 •MtrNMf: 1 4_,T�+, ), Cr•l i : J�1y1�'• 1I �l �� 1 r� I .f rJA 6-1 11 !-y (S[I1 f 1 # _ •_! 7 ,l1'1 . lot•, �l� -N 1..J l� I.. !` ►. :.a ..�i _. )I 'I �..... ...M. �.' Il rf � . . � , . ,....:t L►`•' �r / r "SA 7" a f� SSA 76-6 n =,: •' I r�� ,.i`i,: •�.'t 4��. ����..�>✓ �i, ,/,-1; �. � �� � �. � _� �:lt�rrl lll.Il.,K ✓i. � �� � � ,.,,��,�, �l�jl��� �5t� ..��..y�f' .,;' ,. , ,�,f'+ I�' �r i;' r^;1 r - { t •itf;L•;J ' 1 ,j���,;��'�4�1�1 i�;;jif)}} %/�/ ,�l,`�_ l' •'�/� L- ..11.� kL�i.rrlr.a� afw.C7��'w, /. .. . <` f�•t rr,..; if LOCATION NEAP • II NIC+\M+\,1 Yt�Ohl\It Ma? �/ - varalk'"•.t IN••I/I-01"al i cII,rI n.•.•.I. f MIJM1Mfrll7M 11�CM NYNYINGTON DMN "PLOW DEFT. r-77 L1 .L�1.1 11M. _1J1 ,FAN, _ My . 01 -rill .10 rt ��/r � > �1f�� f C1�Cf1�1.��1J(.I_:t.t —,,�s • ! .�M ..: �x , ..�_�•}'I r r . �� ✓(/�l.�y, �C]�, Ci:]CI_irf. ca�`1`� �;��� ��,:�.M.-�1:=,....:,;�:r;� (. •! � ''I � '�J •;� 1. ��tr�e _ ,�/;� t �J..�t 'Crt10 Ent J;SA �• �• �' `� fl`A 1-0-3 t /lF4, .« i...,-r�•:1 .r;{� �{L/I, l = (j �• �:'. � ) 'lye .. •� .I � , '.1 � � , . �' �.. •r UP ' �',� ti.. � i.. �, 1 ti � ..,is` 11�I I •• , IZ LOCATION MAP a �l t ^IPv1 WM NII11 IIYNTINGTO BUM K MMWC KPt ° ORCULATION PLAN OF. ARTERIAL w • STREETS AND HIGHWAYS Pavm►a+4xs l EGM rKEww SVIKI c~y Hare: @a• i.t. w� too"* ow wr awft um "Not WA low M MM1 r w t1�1\ i --- ..ao r ,O." A& O ---- CITY C}F ��. - HUNTMOTON BEACH - OWIK C01MTY ' CALI�a1M�A / . Minutea, 11, A. Pianni oCommission June :22', 1.978 Page 3 Provision of services and utilities to the areas of concern was dis- cusaed,. `in particular how sewer service would be provided in the event . the coast trunk line to not installed. Commissioner Stern requested than Public Works supply more information on sewers in the area for the Commission ' s publLc hearing:3 on the amendment. 'rhe Commission also discussed the possibility that approval 'of the ,'General Plan redes'.`gnations would prejudice the City ' s Local Coastal "Program. .- Ed Selirh explained that the LCP will , when completed , become an element in the General Plan and will supersede any General Plan des- ignations previously made. Procedure to follow in the interim -period before finalization of the LCP was reviewed, and it was the expressed desire of the Commission that any amendment to the General Plan affecting areas within the coastal zone should he considered in light of the Local Coastal Plan. Commissioner Paone: requested that information showing triAMC comparison among different possible: uses in the Pacific Coast Highway and Beach Boulevard area be presented ; e.g . , office buildings, retail, hotels , etc. , with emphasis on comparisons between those with primarily weekday uses vs. those having typical weekend and evening uses . PRECISE PLANS OF 5TkEG t�t•L T ALIGfIT Bill Derrick presented vugraphs of the proposed precise plans of street alignment and gave a general overview, including ohjectives of the City ' s Circulation Element and a history of the various precise plans presented for review. The Planning Commission will be asked to reaffirm its policy direction established by General Plan Amendment 76-1A and to establish a priority list for phasing of the individual precise plans . Fire Chief Picard addressed the Commission and outlined some of the problem intersections and street alignments which his department would like to see corrected. It was his opinion that the Gothard realignment should be given first priority, with the Lake Street extension also of immediate importance for esaergency equipment circulation. Commission review followed . The Atlanta Avenue alignment was discussed in regard to the need for east-west circulation , attempt to eliminate the clog leg intersection of Atlantan Lake , and Orange , and possible signaliza- tion of that intersection . Staff was instructed to implement Alternetive No. l with an $p-foot street width with no parkway and no parking on the street. Alignment of the street should also be be changed to minimize property take from adjacent lots . Planning staff informed the Commission of their feeling that the Lake - Street extension is the key issuer, affecting the eirculazti.on pattern for all .the other proposed plans, and requested direction that this,:plan is till. a , viable approach before proceeding. . After extens:ve diacussion � , = it, was determined ;to proceed with the extension and that the widening of Like- should also be included in consideration of the precise plan. Minutes$ H.A. Planner Commission June 22, 1978 Page 4 Con"is'sioner Russell nr.,tied that theextensions of Lake and Delaware, the closure of Taylor, the realignment of Gothard, and the on-going " development on Main Street, will all serve to increase the ;burden of traff! " at the intersection of Main, Ellin, and. Beach at Five Points. He requested that staff include this intersection in the study and present alternatives for modification of that irate:section . The following priority list was established by consensus: (1) First Priority Atlanta/Lake (revocation of PPSA 70-4 , consideration of new alternative alignment modified to 80-Moot width) Delaware Extension (revocation of PPSA 70--2 and possibly 70-3) (2) Second Priority - Gothard Realignment from Ellis to Yorktown (PPSA 76-6C) • (3) Third Priority - Lake Street Extension (PPSA 76-6A) -- Lake Street Widening (PPSA 76-6B) - Main Street Abandonment between Garfield and Yorktown (PPSA 76-6e. l (4) Fourth Priority Partial Closure; of Main at Seventeenth (PPSA 76-6D, modified to leave partia,11y open in some fashion) - Closure of Seventeenth at Utica and Yorktown and between Delaware and Clay (PPSA, 76-1 A and B) - Modification of the Five Points intersection (preparation of alternative treatments) The meeting was adjourned to June 27 , 1978 , at 7 : 00 p.m. z. Edward D. Selich Ruth Finley Secretary Chairman i' �c ► , _ !'fit M4- PC 6-22-78 - 7 errs P"Itab 6/21/79 fts tea rds WTICR OF PWIC O" NC _ PtWX-SE NA OF STRW ALIaAEM'I' N0. 79-3 11!' rICl 15 RMW GIVU that a public hearing will be ;wld by the . City Council of the City of MMU"Co n beach, in the Council Choker of the Chic Center, Omtiagtan Beach, at` the hour of rZ! P. M. , or as soon thereafter as pus ible, an y the a,� day of Jam' . 19 79, 'for the pur"we of considering Precise Plan of Stt-et A.lipwnt No. 79-3, a 9mvee1 to preciaelY plan Lake Street between Indlanapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue eatsblishiM 90 meet of rig,t of waY. A leGal description is on file in the Planning Department OfTIce. All Inte' rosted peso ass i,ewit W to ottwd Nola bearing wW w< e�rso their aplateos feet or SPUNt said t A110= tt. l ctt�sr Wonintlen my be oitaLmd five tt a oltiae of the City Cleirk , 2DOO Pkin Str"t, Hunter aftchs CA 9208 - (714) 536-5226 01F., OW sell no 91ho WrICE TO CL9VX TO SCREDUIX PUBLIC WARING IT f.1M T0: CITY CtERK'S OFFICE DATE; PLEASE SCKZDULE A PIIBLIC HEARING USING THE ,ATTACHED LEGAL W)TICE FOR THE DAY OF L1Ll� 19n' . AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's •i Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department ^ Petition t Appeal Other Adoption of Env..ronmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to � --- Planning Department Extension for additional information. * If !ppeal , please transrit exact wording to be required in the legal . Published i .N. Itw"w4eAt won ` • VR Play 34, 197! LEGAL NOVICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN- that a public hearing .will be held by the City Planning Cannission of the City of Huntingqton Beach, California, for the purpose of considering Precise Pl%n of Street • Alignment No. 79-3 , a proposal to precisely plan Lar.e Street between Indianapolis Avenue and Yorktown Avenue establishing 90 feet of right of way. A legal description is on file in the Planning Department Office, Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 ; 00 P am op on June 5 , 1979 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , California . All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and expresm their opinions for or against the proposed Precise Plan of Street Alignment Np. 79 -3 Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Departnen t. Telephone No. (714 ) 536--5271 DATED this 24th day of May, 1979 CITY PLAWING COMM Sim Jaae n W. Palm ;, By Acting Secretary_ , a • •.A T!-2 23-046-17 25--O S47 !ow 18, 19T9 6ttrqpl m "Ulu R dmd 9yth Deft 21 X w. KGkM 11nOrwr IIplmwt MVM ArwlrSw, CA. 92804 17132 Low ?irrt.inyiw amsch, ch. 93"7 YS-aiS-0! A2"S-OK-ti 2S-OSS�i ;1i�w�r� O 11a r4ort Aran AWN 14 '!!wires 7171 1tetlAt Clzcle 6012 Poixt Lor dr. 409 20th Stnot 90 !lrW , CR. 93641 MwtinOm D■rche Ch. 952647 AMO&O cAw 92b48 2�-0�13-Q? � 025-416-10 ?S-f1S5-�Y _ ftdwick it S main trws4: 7541 WAt y dr.it U21 Alwmu 8timi So A, 0. 42648 1 ft&Ch, CR. 92647 mmtkwm Vww*, 0AU y2i4r1 2S tliS�0 2 21P-046-11 2$-05 -4 ! C ansam at a1 City of Dom* why LAM at Al T721 OAgl" Avems d C amp*r Arta. wMtadmaw 0 CR. 92681 9691 Nothrswy crivu tm• ftWA►. Calit gum ri-0451-12 25-055-io ftb wt Jie m et al Jdm Shia" vir t m D mwrlmt '1r'h!'S midw P 1n= 418 E. (X~ !'"tlznt LU 3 Al sbw A wm Owft !lsa, Ch. 92626 11rdb a►, CR. 92tcb1 buntialtan bwm*, Cyal.tf 936" 125-045-11 25-055-02 2.5-035-11 '#I 11 Lrs Awwwy rwxwrth pwism C wlun A WW 54S +twrsr; l mae 1.217 Aldum St. M2 Lrarra" Drive N1Lbvmk, CA. Qzn28 ! mukah. cam. 9'%48 Satit.i wm cm CA"f 9i646 25-W 5-14 2"55-03 25-055 42 qtr. � pftd mw*ia.dc x Th mae c.' turd ~1 dk tm 9748 roUdw Oar. U05 ALdB Avg thr-diretn Pasch, CA. 92646 rz rwy. Ch. 90240 MmUr"tun Hand,* 4AII 92649 :S-M6-1 A 25-05 r-06 25-055'13 Ow !71sm" e% aI 1rwlyn still Ur um C Jrohr+Msss I 1 Ill Cl rti le L211 AX&bn t Aw vm 1101 ALtwr Aver rr "Itrltti hrr:h, CA. 42649 lWWW" PAwch, M. 92i48 lluntirwum M"Ch, tulf 92648 is-Ow 17 2S-�SS-OS 23�-053►-15 �t�#r�M1 9ri11a ; RrstAlart � N 4311dA11 1 lri w. sty: t i jt 11 j 1207 Aiab, Strad. llxo Uuub W=10 Munt1iv; 8 *ah, Ch. 92"1 1Riut Wn Vall y, Calif 92700 sm Zfth OD { �'�•� 23-04}-li h+1�lk J1 1llirid L Mi 11 saws 7757 &W1" rpm ?9_3 1210 Pim St o t MMMIk, C IUAf mw 140 1979 mba�ft, �11�3 926" grid 14abt,L oeM amwh culomlr Willlm t hud n 1 'Y Ati Drive "M OirUkaM 1201 LOOM ytiaart powl to 0 Call i2S mot mtxwt rMlktrMQtcn bddb, C"M 27�T sw. noo id r1l, Cali! MIN 92i48 203 23-Otl-L's 2�3-01 J� T QUAW ,. M eMd M &*A M mcm ee 113i2 iMm"Iclitf twive 9712 4ciVs 1&%* Strut go" AM** Calif mach, coat# bud►o mur 9Yi03 92+i46 l2i4o 2S- S�r-07 23-003-14 22-093-06 !"ram-Lov Admm 1tL 1m a amt OwU Hf Ltr:n 0192 90 ""I Circle AwS 120! L o Sts�rt ftrQh, Ca l i 1 213 Awls AWO MMo 4 moa m e Wif 102ii6 Om cb, Cali t 926" 9264 1r456-06 23-03-13 23-06e+-02 WAWA 2bt"t k-d Zlumm C 8t bom Domaw Cif f Pad 31U1 Ttu*m M hda hmim 1102 Pixy 5tAVK u�ran",, Cant t4antir an mosch, cal.lt »anon ybm erode, Calif 92fi7 5r2641 92648 2S-056-09 23-0 3-12 22-01i'-15 Uolbourm A Whud Clecisb*h c R Firm John M PtiMmk" 2707 W. J.f f orm i bl vd 424 12th Street 1104 Pirr stint , Ims An pim, CA Li f WVVtiXIqtK3ft MW Ot AxTumtu, IBCho C^xLf wJ018 9:668 92648 !r056--10 23-NIP-11 23•-086.09 Umstor a Phomia at al Jam L UA%1 et &I Dept of Vou Af f&Uv of 307 mot?wc Et wt 201 Agum AWMMN Statr of calif onou /M, Calif lis Ungtmn LV- mdx, calit CMrlm E Wthat V627 97"8 1112 Piro stmot 25�-OWII 23•-043-OS � ' 2 itt �fi, CAW 9mo ! no AhrJA 9 C,.nis 'imi. M Sctmmr !' w* J Mama 19 741 Wordwatm LAM 1342 Pits it owt U16 Pine Stet I funti CAI 11 It L 4ark$ CAI it aa*tizv)tm Maori, 011E �2fi4L 9264f 192646 2rQ5ir- 1] 23-083-17 21-04i-07 1y14 G mm GWY c Pow wiIIIAM J c�+nMt 901 AIAW W& AVwwm LWK Mm Strait Jj.M rim Anot ianoh. Calif apt.irson Mari, CAI ",Urqtcn Ike, +ca1,i! y�tlr�ii S?if i y 2i 44 %own tivy LN Www fit I J8 PAN J f ter �R"t� l NW I f!!xi lMCi I '� ^�bM T�TtiJ • / �u !!'�i 1 7�"i� RRtt !�f i J'tT90 a�v��11 amox t U m SYTT a "34 1l T K6 �W %ml MO �■p�a � , tC-t�lU-fit of T"r •r-t�o-♦t issm w*n as MOM tit'S VWM WT KVT *is R� !) MUM Jim N ovi'zt Aw" M of I it U--19"t Wtvr-K �r SW4 tWG t Wr6 l %soxS WWI STi �'�! IP" SZOT 7psu S 7 6m x 3inwbmt am _ wommmw Ace v Oman .mg iTtR7 'ta mwg i�aYs9 q%n SZOt f tAZT iTOr[ e � LTTT �rw a ►ta UT*7pm r *wow 30"1"1 v •mac Mrs 0 RS TfriD '` '€�rl1 JTTR7 *"Wu il! *4=W "VJK VD& M um �m� Wh"T :TtR f wril V s � AWT= s Y Ttoom RM lT►iw0 ' !!�i I 311 do I loom iu�'it �i'C� i1i J � 'tom iTT�D 't� At�itti - . J iTT�D 'WoR waftmyv=oo v �np n OCT A* Inv S-d VIM VIM IM # am LT-tyO-�E CT {x • WOW swam �b 79�2 M �` 11t��1wr "Gibe Cilf� ow L0, a" t� 3it1! im �Mrc!►, ClLlii 24.1K1-,91 "Not-" Ifthis! M'4�asir Jx' & �dr fu ,t�ir b ww's ion" CFO* 1 A R. heriit tt OL 3M I aLQM .a. ras in tam -21 Z jw3ey ndIW A MINGLUND t Uli�1�l�pf 939 loth stlrwt 911 1016 P.O. Matt solch, Callt ftw d4 Cal Gin Sal t�ltt 9�i1 lbi4i 2+ ,0 f P'wl C Fm bu it al SW1 ktiits No" 9rlS 14t1i stswrt 914 10th OWN 201 AA C'ttwt hmw, NW&A "m Boo, Calif mw*- agtm fta*4 Cb`1lt y�M �p err tom! llii�b 9�iM taw P kkwm /lofft1MS v Card a NWOON "9 left strait 224 Quot bit 737 Ldw Strw* f�4�1 M�OiY1w0l 2+-01-13 2e- -07 wtin U 1twIL.1,11/y Ot Al JWAW J amm Ltdos4 loth su"St 9" low ats 2261 Ik*Z* own Aid A OMWAMOM Mai, WJJ raw CALi! owta No", Cal1t r2dN f 92626 'f 14-01-02 2+-011-21 ••7,hC�t2-0(rs ��� � 136 loth Sttwt 2Oi Lit ANWM 10236 tlw* P4Vm w beach CAW motiroftm buct't, Clair Dowth Cater, CLuf gbf4t WDo +F�il-Ol 2e�1�27 2�-�2�ty Heald L Pains rMSAA C Ydbt BOOM RwAvo cer 30 IQth !;Uvwt 216 cJcw/t Avemin 212 b '!quir Jlr�rrtt�s �tinyt�t Iimdt, Cal ' bmmcbv Cal i Amtoo LIC4 CAI 16"4� 92i4A !i � i; �'� /• ,; cif �� , i� Doom LIMlilr Lm awmMm cm).l� Lim j 1 Cat ONFAM WA,Cbf CAW vl ra�fe ,Otwp , n4= B ftmclb• Gain Md r mi P.O. a 07 sem*, CLUt 92"s ; AtAgm !� r in 9b. S"m sae /1d v&uw, Cur "Oumuff Doi" s r