Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrecise Plan of Street Alignment 79-5 - 70 ft Right-of-way o r L IM,�.,710E 1' O AM%--• PUBLISHING CO. • PARsh"oI �tJtllA P"K NEWS HUN'1146TON BEACH INDEPENDENt IQNTER ANAHEJM INDEPENDENT ivd, a Garden Grove, California 92543 • (714)537-7510 DEC. 319 1979 r HE 1066T L '•t 'x' .. N'TI NGTON BEACH P CITY CLERK T BEACN9 CA. 92648 • t . CVNT:* PAYAME 07 TIC *,IC%:* r PUDLIF-HED': DEC . 279 1979 RE ; PUBLIC HEARING 79--5 CHARGE FOR PUBLICATIONt 37 lines = 3 .79 legal sauares 0 3 . 50 = *13 .27 I t ; J I� Form No.OW 02rM , 1. . tit. lit , ; po Pl.0vi RE C ' EST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by James W. Paling Direz,tozpapertment Development Swrvices Gets Prepared December 26 1979 Backup Material Attached Yet [] No Subject Precise Plan. of S::reet Alignment 79-5 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended . APPR B�cltb�NCII. lop- Md Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE : Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79-5, a proposal to establish a 70 foot street right- of-way section on Palm Avenue between 17th and Coldenwest Streets. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommend that the City Council approve the Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79-5. ANALYSIS: APPUCAN T: Huntington Beach Company 2001 Main Street Huntington Beach , California 92648 LOCATION: PaLm Avenue between 17th and Goldenwast Streets REQUEST: To establish a 70 foot right-of-way ' sect:ion in lieu of the 80 foot right--of-way designated for a secondary arterial in a circulation element of the General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON DECEMBER 16', 1979: On motion by Shea and Second by Bazil , Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79--5 was approved by the folluwing vote: AYES: Winchell, , Kenefick, Bazil , Shea, Bauer NOES Stern, Greer ' ABSENTz None no am Y � . Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79-5 December 26, 1979 Page 2 DISCUSSION: On December 18, 1979, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79--5 . The precise plan was originally considered by 'the Planning Commission at their October 21 , 1979 meeting and continued to the November 20tih meeting p6 Wing the submission of traffic data from PP,QSD, the traffic )ngineering consultant who is in the process of developing the''City ' s transportation demand model . The section on Palm Avenue between Goldenwest and 17th St'xeets is presently classified an a secondary arterial . The standard secondary arterial design requir's an 80 foot right-of-way. The 80 foot right-of-way is designed to accommodate a maximum of 22, 000 average daily trips (ADT) . It allows for two travel lanes on each side of the street plus ]left-turn pockets. The proposed 70-foot right-of-way would essentially maintain the existing street section on Palm Avenue . No additional street, dedication would be required . A 70-foot s; reet sect ion would not pro- vide for left hand turn pockets. In a lei;:ter dated December 10, 1979 from PPQ&D, it is stated that the model projects a maximum of 4 , ,184 average daily trips in 1995 on this section of Palm Avenue . According to the Department of public Works, " the suggested Interim and ultimate street section alternatives for the existing 70-fo%at right-of-way on Palm Avenue have the capabilities of handling 10 ,000 and 20 , 000 vehicle trips per day respectively; therefore, both of the alternatives for the 70-foot right-of-way have the ability to handle the projected 1995 traffic volume . " The staff is recommending that Precise Plan Street Alignment 79-5 be adopted by resolution so that the Council ' s action will take effect immediately . An ordinance will be prepared and submitted to :`'he Council for adoption At their next regular meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the Environmen*.:1 Regulations in effect at this time, the sFatf is recommending that the City Council adopt Negative DeclaL tion No. 79-65 which assesses the environmental effects of tite project. FUNDING SOURCE: Not appl.icabl.e. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: City Council may consider precisely planning this negment of Palm Avenue with an 80 foot right-of-way which is the standard street design for a secendery arterial. Precise Plan of Street Agnment 79-5 December 26, 1979 Page 3 SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1 . Area , Map 2 . Resolution 3 . November 6, 1979 Planning Commission Staff Report 4 . December 10, 1979 letter from PPQ&D 5 . December 11, 1979 memoran9um from the Department of Public Works Respectfully submitted$ ea P7. Palin, Director Development Services JWP;J,RB:j b PLANt�tNG ZONING pM IQ 9- 6rll a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-11 CITY OF /OOItfO NiCr /. ./11 '�� 1'V ..A�'a. ~' /'�'� It •M Qt/ COvt 1 P\►\i\t1 \0 ryi N t• •1 e"•tt m HUNTINGTON BE-JACH �l�l �1.r�.lw•%t: .►.'L .,Of •.■.r ..1 for i.wal 1./•i1 IN � •. •� 'jl:.,o/u ■arnl pe.0 .r1Maa1 rr. N•1N If1 1 r :1 •., J1 rr��l/ .avl. q/•,/tl •r•at 1.�1 41• awl 1 ;01 n= Ll: aww /ra•1i, 111•.1 I 4-or Ili• ,1 trlF.w•\.. hr..r1 / r 1 .• . [•It•1 M11 t 1.1, '1 'a {. w••■"Mrt 1tr/.,•a M••t1 �� �\ �� +,'l/ �. COUNTY,� 1 t\ 1, II 0 /\ Nl A I.,;lry #441 1�"t '� JH11[N►I AMENDED br ZONE CASV 1 t1 1139 • .. !;1'+ta■►M1 • a f-r's r1N 1N,111.M[111.11.10.61.51,J •C n 1 11.11►r1,1.1 /[Ji1 1111/1 1.0/11 INJ / .. i 3 4 1�. L•..i tWr/ •-/•/, r•a••t/te. of .•1. 1'•'111i1,h 111111.►p *I,) 7 q•1w h f1. .e• '1 •� fa.MtK/ t• 4.6 bt 1A of ommo•.ft .� J 11 1• /1 •• •J .� V' �� � ftr / 11•. \ ! /' , `• CI M2 C J �r , I ,`4..h ► M 2-G2 .. , / fG ��• 4/1 CIO oold eJ Vi AjF ► 11 1A r, ~ ci M �•T` w.•w t r, ti 1 , PLANNING aE_ �,.. T101,! '' ! DISTRICT MAP 10 --5 -- 11 CrIl" OF HUNTINGr-rON BEACH 0HANG" Es COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP low u#'/STIN � ♦' ' r 1� � R . ./ _ ._ ♦.. , it�•t + � � -I''�• �i •♦ _.�_�._ � _!�..I-._.1.Y.,.. r4�.,w. � ... _. fT 25 • C•r1H ••., "' \ I '•1., r..� . . 7- f+I1 1 w! CA CF , .. CA x CF_R W I�_ L' "Litt In l lti ' CX�•��--•-�{ Ri;1111-1 41 OIL NI Uj 4. •yLn �W, ra J / s••� .� a.. CL !'� f i �♦ ; a' Iti / ,.Z��l�' r c M�tldnflmgl PHQ&D, Inc. Engmeerr•Architects• Planner% December 10 , 1979 Mr. George Tindall City Engineer City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach , Ca1itorn1a 92648 RE: Preliminary Transportation Model Assignment Results Palm Avenue west of Golden West Street Dear Mr. Tindall : The City has requested us to provide an early response on the: 1995 estimated daily traffic volume for the segment of Palm Avenue between I7th Street and Golden West , asestimated by the Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model which we have developed under contract to the City. Initial model-produced highway assignments have recently been completed for 1995. For the street segment in question , the model results tend to support the hand calculated estimates we provided to Mr. Paul Cook a few weeks ago. Parsons Brinckerhoff' s role. of course , is to prepare Citywide traffic forecasts under the terms of our contract for the Huntington Beach Transportation. Demand Model Project , We arc not connected in any other way with the parties to the development issue which , we understand, Is currently before the Planning Commission a 0 which prompted the request for early release of assignment Information on the segment of Palm Aventic . Overall , we are pleased at this point with the reasonableness of the assignment information the model 's generating. Nonetheless , we envision making some adjustments and reassign w.nts as we feel are warranted before the 1995 modeling effort for the City as a whole will be conplete. However , in the specific case of the Palm Avenue link In question, we dn not currently have any reason to expect that there will be any order-of-magnitude change in the link assignment from what the model currently is predicting. The model-generated link assignment currently .availabie is 4 , 184 vehicles per day for 1995• (The model results do, Incidentally , include the effects of anticipated future land development and street system changes west of Golden West Street . ) As we mentioned, this number is prellminary and approximate , but we do not anticipate any upward adjustment large enough to affect the basis outcome of the decision we under- stand Is currently pending. Please let its know if we can be of future assistance. Vej. truly yo s , of OJ(" I r Robert W. Goedhart , Project Z)aeger Suite 4&0. 2323 North Rrwdway•SinlA Ane !'`twiew center•S wta Anx.Caltfvrrite RIP706 •914-641.414"1 A Huh0harp of 11amwo Nrtnchrrhaff puodp&lhxvla•.Itic. J, .t CITY OF IHUMVIN43TON gUACH , INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To James Palin From George Tindall Director, Development Services City Engineer Subject Precise Plan of Street pate December 11 , 1979 Alignment No. 79-5 Attached is a copy of a letter from P. B .Q.&D. Inc , responding to the Cit,y ' s request for estimated future traffic volumes on Palm Avenue between Goldenwest Street and 17th Street. As indicated in the letter the 1995 projected traffic volume is 4 , 184 vehiclea per day (v. p. d . ) . The suggested interim and ultimate street section alternatives for the existing 70 foot right-of-way on Palm ,Ave. have the capability of handling 10 , 000 v. p.d . and 20 , 000 v. p. d . respectively. Therefore , both of the alternatives for the 70 foot right-•af-way have the ability to handle the projected 1995 traffic volume. Qe—org4)-Tindall City Engineer GT: jy Attach. • huntington beach deveiei'ment services department STA f f f REPOR Z .. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Department of Development Serv; cc3s DATE: November 6 , 1979 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 79-5 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 79-65 APPLICANT: Huntington Beach Company DATE ACCEPTED: 2110 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 October 21 , 1979 LOCATION: Palm Avenue between 17th MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: and Goldenwest Streets December 20, 1979 REQUEST: To permit a precise plan of street alignment to main- tain existing 70 ' right-of- way in lieu of the 80 ' arterial right-of-way. ACREAGE: N/A 1 . 0 RECOMMENDER ACTION: The staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of Precise Plan of Street- Align- ment No. 79-5 and adopt the attached Resolution No. 1251 . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: The section of Palm Avenue between Goldenwest and 17th Streets is presently classified as a secondary arterial . The standard secondary arterial design requires an 80-foot right-of-way . The 80-foot right-of-way is designed to accommodate a maximum of 22 ,000 average daily trips (ADT) . It allows for two travel lanes on each side of the street plus left turn pockets . The proposed 70-foot right-of-way, w'ould eliminate the left _urn pockets from the design (see attached typical designs . According to the Department of Public. Works , the ultimate average traffic on Palm Avenue is 12 ,, 000 to 15 , 000 vehicle trii;t; per day . These projections were derived through review of previous studies for the area and estimates from PPO&D , the transportation engineering firm which is presently preparing the City 's Transportation Demand Model (see attached memorandum) kIS4 4-, A•iM-43A P . P .S .A. 79-5 November 6 , 1979 Page 2 The northerly half of Palm Avenue between Goidentireat and 17th Streets has been dedicated to 40 feet and improved. The southerly half In dedicated to 40 feet between Goldenw�st and 22nd Streets ; the remaining southerly portions of Palm` Avenue between 22nd and 17th Streets remain at 30 feet from centerline. A 10-foot dedication on this portion of the street would be required to achieve the designated 80-foot right-of-way. 3. 0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: The major issues of concern regarding Precise Pl.in of Street Alignment 79-5 are as follows : 1 . Whether data accurately reflects the ultimate traffic volcme on Palm Avenue . 2 . Whether the proposed reduced street width which eliminates left turn pockets would increase the potential Eor traffic accidents and congestic:, on Palm Avenue in the future, 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations In effect at thic time , the Department of Development Services has posted draft Negative Declaration No . 79-65 for the prescribed period of time , and no comments either verbal or written were received. The staff in its initial study of the proposal has reconunended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to action on the application , it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and adopt Negative Declaration No. 79-65 . 5.0 ANALYSIS: The attached typical design for the 70-foot street section shows an interim condition with two tralycl lanen plus a left turn lane and an ultimate condition with four, travel lanes and no 1F:ft, turn pockets . According to the Department of Public Works the interim design will be used initially until traffic volumes justify the ultimate design . As indicated in the attached memorandum prepared 'Ly the Depart- ment of Public Works , "Preliminary projected 1995 traffic volumes on Palm Avenue are well below the demands for a secondary arterial highway. " It appears that this would justify the adoption of the precise plan, retaining the secondary arterial classification with the specification that a - 70-foots right-of- way section be , es- tablished. The ultimate offect of this change will be to , _. eliminate left turn pockets which are included -in the standard 80-foot design . November 6, 1979 Payee 3 6 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: The staff in accordance with the recommendation of the Department of Public Works , recommends that the Planning Commission recom- mend to the City Council approval of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79--5 and adopt attached Resolution No. 1251. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area Map 2 . Memorandum from the Department of Public Works 3 . Typical street sections 4 . Resolution No. 1251 9 . Negative Declaration 79-65 JRB :df -)gV f_, a� N CITY OF HIUNTINGTON REACH � INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►nwtswcatrs nKtr � ` To James Palin From F ul E. Cook Director, Development Services D�rector of ffblic Works Subject Right of flay Width for Palm Ave. Date November 2, 1979 Between Goldenwest & Seventeenth St. P.P.S. A. 79-5 In response to a developer ' s request for relief from dedication of ten feet of additional right--of-way on Palm Ave. 'letween Goldenwest and Seventeenth, we have analyzed the projected traffic volumes on this street to determine if they can be handled within the existing right-of- way of seventy feet. On the City ' s Master Plan of Arterial Highways , Palm Ave. is classi- fied as a secondary arterial hi.lh%oay from Goldenwest St. tu Seventeenth St . The right-of-way requirement for a secondary arterial is eighty feet with a curt, to curb width of. 64 feet. This provides four travel lanes plus parking or bicycle lanes on each side . Palm Ave . currently has a right-of-way width of 70 feet which normally would require a dedi- cation of teen additional feet before adjacent development would be allowed . Previous traffic studies indicate an ultimate average daily traffic (ADT) demand of 12, 000 to 15, 000 vehicles per day on Palm Ave. This demand is well within the capacity of a secondary arterial highway. To verify these projected volumes , we consulted the Project Manager of P .B.Q . AD, who are the City ' s consultants on our Transportation Demand Model. Their preliminary projected 1995 traffic volumes on Palm Ave. are well below the demands for a secondary arterial highway. Our analysis shows that the developer ' s request for relief from the ten foot dedication of right-of-way is reasonable and can be supported by available traffic data . it is recommended that Precise Plan of Street Alignment 79-5 be adopted for Palm Ave . between Goldenwest and Seventeenth that would retain its classification as a secondary arterial highway but would specify a 70 fool: right-of-way with a 54 foot pavement section as shown on the attached plan. Striping within the 54 foot section can accommodate up to 22 , 000 vehicles per day. Although no additional right-of-was dedication on Palm is recornmendied, developers should be made aware that removal of existing curb .and ' gutter and construction of a widened pavement section which will total 54feet will be a requirement of the Public Works Dept. NLttrTINWON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. PF.0: j y Attach. NOY 2 1979 P. 0. Box i90 Huntk4ttat Bench, CA MW PAL.W.- AVENa r GOLDEMWEST ST. TO 17 TH. ST. �_ _...__.._...7.o.'...... .. _. .... r..._._....Qo' ..___. . _ .. ........_.__ �30' ` s' • �7'� 27' �' Q: B IKE VEHICLE LEFT VEHICLE BIKE J w LN. 1 LN. TURN LN, LN. �a f LN. ,W Wt � � W _. �..� cj� ..c INTERIM CONDITION 70 } . _ 40' ..__ _ .._ � _.�.. �..... 30' ct -- _._.2 7- -_. . .. .....;.� __.--27-- -8 ?'...:.. 10' ._s... 10'..... L_.1 ''. ...Lr. 10'. .,. ._7'_I BIKE VEIL . r V E H VEH. i VEH, BIKE IJ ir w� LN. LN. LN, L LN. LN, w �i tt I 1tn < w .--�, 5 - ULTIMATE CONDl 'rlO'N A.Y. M ENIJ-K GOLDENWEST ST, TO 17 TH. S T. 70' 3o, >- BIKE VEIIIGLE LEFT VEHICLE (BIKE LIJ. L N. TURjN I.N. LN, s i L N. `w G � �� � z � O INTERIM CONDITION 70' 40 , 27 _ ._ ._ .loft....._ _.. . a rr :J DIKE VEN. VEN. 1'I;11. VEi1. F�IKL , W) LN, LN. LN LN. LN. L.N. !?J- 1 =1 I cc o ULTIMATE CONDITION w PA L M AY w GOLDENWEST ST. To 17TH. ST. Lr BIKE VEHICLE VEHICLE LEST VEHCLE VEHICLE BIKE Ji LN. LN. LN. TUF N LN. Ltd. LIt I�+ a� LN I w SECONDARY ARTERIAL HIGHWAY 5.►. I�i•30.79 s r RESOLUTION NO . 1251 JN A RESOLUTION OI' TIM 1'I,AN14ING COMMISSION OF THE , ' CITY Or IIUNTINGTON LEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND-- ING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OP STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 79-51 THE PRECISE: ALIGNMENT OF PALM AVENUE BETWEEN SEVENTEENI'll STREET AND GOLDENWEST STREET, WHEREAS , the Planning Commission of the City of Hunt- ington Beach, California , has held one public hearing in compliance with the State Government Code in order to consider and review Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 79--5 ; and 141WREAS , said precise plan will reduce the ultimate: right-of-way width along Palm Avenue from 17th Street to Golden- west Street from :its 00-root width as depictedon the Circulation Clement of the General flan for the City of Iluntinyton Beach to a 70-foot right-of- way whic}i will he comprised of two S-foot parkways , two 7-foot bicycle lanes , and four 10-foot travel lanes ; and S111EREAS, the Planning Cartimission has determined that ! said precise plan will protect the public health and safety of the inhabitants of the City and will allow for the orderly development of the community . i 14014, THEREFORE, tit: I'll ItLSOI•VEU that the Planning Commis- sion of the City of Huntington teach hereby :.approves said Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 79-5 . REGU1,A)MY PASSED AND AbOwIlED by the I'lanni.ng Commission o�' the City of Huntington Beach , California , on the: day of Hvvember, 1979 , by the following roll call vote : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: f mes W. Pa In , Secretary Ito6ert D. Eiazi C airman fro- a :df WrlCt or 1C NKMNQ PAWISE PLAN Or STPJM AL1GNI9BNT 79-5 NOTICE It NEUDY OWN that a Public be&ring vL11 be held by t!* y City Council of the City of Wmtb*ton Beach, in the Council Cher of the Civic Center, Muatiagton Mach, at the hour of • 7+30,,,,,, P.M. . or m soon thereafter as possible, on Monday • � 4 the ....Uh ...-. day Of .January * 1p�, for the purpose of conaLdering Precise plan of Street Aligmmnt No. 79-5, a petition to establish a 70 ft. right of way on Palo Avenue betwran Sevcateenth and Goldentmat Streets. Negative Declaration No. 79-65 Will bu considered in conjunction with this application. A legal description is on file in the Departswnt of Development Sorviees Office. All Interested parse" are invited to attod Paid h4ari g and ea"d their eptateer for or gWbwt said precise plan of Streit Altglr t No. 79-5. t: Vw r inforestieu err be ibtiirwd from tics Offies at tbo City Clerk, 2000 hairs •tx t. Mentington leach, Witoftia. 1714) 536-5227 ' ! At M. Ctl�► �o� 4 NOTICZ TO C TO SCNEDUIX YWLI NURINC ITS! t„r TO: CIVC CLERK'S Off ICN G41TE: FROM: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HMARIhC IMING THE ATTACHED LEGAL MOTICE FOR THE DAY OE , 1 At's are attached APIs will follow No Aug a Initiated by: Planning Co—ission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Envirotow tal Status (x) YL ' i1O Refer to Planning Department - Extension d .6Z74-- for odditicmal infonation. * If ajM pleas transmit exact warding to be requkred in the legal. full isttuc 11 . 11. ineidN�rnde�nt Ne 0 0 October .979 LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 79-5 , NOTICE IS }HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Planning Commission of the City of 11%inti�►�ton PeAch , California , for the purpose of considering Precise an o St re t a4;&-. Aliynmeent No. 79-50 a to establish a 70 f t. right of way on Palm Avenue between Seventeenth and Goldenwest Streets. Negative Declaration No 79-65 will be considered in conjunction with this application. legal description is on file in the Department of Developm nt Services Office. Said hearing will be held at the hour of 7 00 P .M . , on November 6 , 1979 , in the Council Chambers Building of the Civi - tenter, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California . All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for o: against the proposed Precise Flan of Street Alignment No. 79 -5 . Further information may be obtained front the City Planning Departnent. Telephone No. (714) 536--5271 DATED this 25th day of October , 1979 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION James W. Palin By Secretary ..r 1 . df* ON y u :t r,r •� 3- 114-19 20 df 023--111-08 df 023-141-24 :tary G. Skaratedt Anthony J. TLtold Circle T. Corp. C/o Personal Property Mcjmt. del Delatwarp St. 610 E. 17th St. , Ste. 20 :j142 Warner Ave. StW. 106 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92701 11unti.ng ton Beach, CA 92649 923-114--21 df 023-141-12 df 023-141-25 Jams W. McHugh Charlotte E. Fulton William Kroutil 16529 llarlxcur Lane 039 14th Street 16 31 iKanola Road lluntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 La Efabra, CA 90631 �)23-114-22 df 023. 141-13 df 023-141-26 d David D. Dahl Joe E. lluskins lannis Baden GOD 20th Street 19811 Shorecliff lane 622 19th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92640 Huntington Beach, CA 96248 UuntLngton beach, CA 10" U23-114-23 df 023-141-18 df 023-141-27 d 'I. Thomas Ganz Serge V. Sh©rbin Geroge R.. Roeeo 17301 Beach boulevard 617 18th Street +620 19th Street funtington Beach, CA 92647 lluntinjton Deach, CA 96245 lluntington Beach, CA 92648 U23-141-02 df 023-141-19 df 023-142-02 df Preenc:is L. llardesty Catherine A. Abbatecola Heloh L. Eskridge 1' .0. Box 678 200 Westarn Avenue 20951 Brookhurst St. lluntington reach , CA y?.648 Glendale, CA 91201 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ti,t i-141-04 df 02 3-141-20 df 02 3-142-03 df il,ob art I,. Krebs Robert H. Hay Carlene E. Edwards t,16 19th Streevt 2749 Albatrona Drive 622 18th Street t:untincyton !.teach, CA 92640 Costa Mesa , CA 92626 lluntington Beach, CA 92648 u23-141-:,5 df 023-141-21 df 023-142-04 df Thatuas It. Dowels Robert H. Hay Roy D. Folatchek t,901 Vista Gel Sol Drive Huntington Collection Agey. 62U 18th Street duntiMiton lluach, CA 92447 P .O. lox 8248 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley CA 92700 4j 23-141-06 df 02-3--141-22 df 023-142-05 df ;,urval Prakash David Baron, at al Alfred E. Fars c.:.0 19th Street 7212 Deep Harbor Drive P.O. box $92 ttuntiri+lton Deacho CA 9264C Muntingtoa Beach, CA 96248 Vail , Colorado 81657 tj:.3-1 -S 1-07 df 023-141- 23 cif 02 3-142-06 df t,ouaid L'ilvenian, et al Lail R. Nolte William R. Paxson 1939 ^t:lbY Avenue 2ISO4 Lost River Drive 115 9th Street ia33 Anqules , CA 9002a DiAmond bar, CA 91765 Huntington Deach, CA 92641 t►c:t. 23 , 1979 Page 1 df 023-113-00 df 023-114-03 d ,iuntington beach Co. George A. Green Jr. Lowell D. Zehnder 2110 gain Street 9432 Seven Avenue 201 14th Street ..unti.ngton beach, CA 92648 Westninater, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1i23-100-05 Of 023-113-09 -if 023-114-09 df Huntington beach School Clyde S. Jones Jr. Dorothy E. Arnold District 10241 Jennrich Ave. P.O. ftK 228 1902 17th Street Garden Grove, CA 92643 Uuntington beach, CA 92G48 Huntington Beach , CA 92468 U23-100--06 df 023-113-10 df 023-114-11 df ttunti.ngton Beach School Thomas X. Jotunson Craig A. Carstens District 609 20th St. , Apt. A 1908 Acacia Avenue, P.O. Sax 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 liuntingtom Beach, CA 92646 runtington Beach, CA 92648 023-121-01 df 023-113-11 df 623-114-12 df luntington Beach Co. Kathryti J. Matthews Josaph W. RcxemWange r 11roperty Tax Division 621 20th St. Apt. A 621 19th St. , Apt. A r25 Bush Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92645 San Franciscn, CA 94120 023-112-05 df 023-113-1.3 df 023-114-13 df :Itandard Oil Co. of Calif. Milton A. Jelinowic:, etaal Larry 1 . Malilay Property Tax Division 4772 Camdleberry avenue 20862 Hunter Lane +).o. pox 3495 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 San Francisco, CA 94.119 023-113--02 df 023-113-14 ,15 df 023-114•-14 df Uorc*L-by Z . Fields Gladys H. Bryant John L. Paterson 92312th St. , Apt. 4 6139 Notth Faust Ave. 4915 East 6th Street .7faritt' Monica CA 90403 Lakewood, G% 90713 Lung beach, CA 90814 023-113-03 df U23-113-03 df 023-113-16 df 023-114-15 df Lloyd A. Wickstrom Ronald W. liarford Mitchell Stonoff 2775 Cottontail Lane 612 71st Street 607 19th St. l.os anon, CA 93402 uuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 U23-133-04 df 023-113-17 df 023-114-16 df 'Teresa Adams Michael W. Fedderly Timothy N. Bortvit 19661 quiet Day Lane 610 21st Street 605 19th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington Brach, CA 52648 023-113-06 df 023-114-02 df 023-114-17 df � Urban Reconstruction Corp. Richard N. Salseonson, et al Wayne R. Mathits 1 22204 Hawthorne Blvd ., P.O. 8" 1314 tilt 20th Street - I#orrance, CA 90505 Newport Roach, CA 92663 II=tingtco beach, CA 92648OWN f � 0 � mow. wr �w..�.M.�..A.•a....•b rMA..�r do,•nMaM►.. .1 rl.. .. a ... 'ft r*6i.M.M1O1t IMF...M V S•• a- 14�MO'.1 cif 023--143-02, 03 df 023- 143-16 d � rlIdrail it.Streeitnt George J. Galkin Gary L. Bunder t .0. Dox 1547 341 aesona Lane -!1intington ijeach, Cry .3264E Huntiii9ton Reach, CA 92648 Huntington Deach, CA 32646 e3-142-10 df 023-143--04 df 023--143-17 d til I%ld L. CL-Opar Robert W. Pruitt Gary L. Bander '.t)4 18th Street 2330 Shields 6421 Tyrone Circle 'juntingtun ueae:hT CA 92648 La Crescenta, CA 91014 Huntington beach, CA 92647 3--142-11 df 023--141-07 023-143-18 dt + aria Shaffer Development Gary L. Deudsr :31 promontory Dr. East CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 16771 Diane Lana .uwport Beach, CA 92G6D Dept. Public works Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ja3-142-13 df 023-143-OF df 023^143-19 df +anan Townlota Raymond Pratt Abraham taerhs -/o Janus ro. 6472 Newbury Drive c/o Eather Spector f7932 -D Sky Park Boulevard Huntington Beach, CA 96247 607 loth Street 1 rvine, CA 92714 Huntington beach , CA 92648 I.'.3-142-15 df 023-143-09 df 023-143-20 df ilharles Ile xinansen Tr . Darbara S. Purkey Ester Spector t.15 17th Street Barbara D. Woods 607 16th Street !luntington Deach , CA 92648 2414 Rancho Ca.beza or. !luntington Beach, CA 96248 Santa Roma, CA 95401l, j123-141-16 df 023- 143-10 df 023-181-03 df .wnry A. Lricksun Carlton seal Chevron USA Inc. 127 6th I.Struet 104 South Pecos Attn: Property Tax Dept. 11odl beach, CA 90740 Midland, Texas 79701 P .O. Box 7611 San Francisco, CAI 94120 lie 3-142-18 dt' 023-143-11 df 023--211-01 df !uflin W. marshall Russell C. Williams Corliss F. Fitch ,25 15th St . Apt. h 611 16th Street 19841 Scenic Day Lane :.tintington Beach, CA 52648 Huntington Beach , CA 92640 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 023-142+-19021 df 023-143-12 df 023-211-02 df liriu bovy warren S. Nichols Russell R. Frasier .:'6 18th Street 609 16th Street 19831 Scenic Day lane }untinhton Beach, CA 92648 Runtington Beach, CA 92648 11%uttington peach, CA 92646 ►? 3-142-23 df 023-143-14 df 023-21.1-03 Af 4naE-Ca lcott Three Dreen De! Door Carmen v. glean /o Janes Co. 1606 Acacia Avrnue 19821 S�:a►sic Day LaAe 7932 Sky Vark. Blvd. D Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington eerach, CA 92648 rvine, CA 92714 151t 79�-5 df 4 of (o ,, 3-21L-04 df 023-221-01 df 023-291-05 .pine D. Dehae California State Depayrtnent. R+ab:rt w• Bradley ! ell scenic bay Lane of Transportation 7232 ba~xock Dr. suntingtan Beach, CA 92648 120 south Spring St. Huntington bleach, CA 9266 • Lass Angeles, CA 90052 t );3-112-01 df At1.Yt: Staff Jlaristant, 023•-291-06 d ' aillin A. Colbert 9e►sign _ B Robert 0. Twnwr i 4 52 Scenic Bay Lams 7222 Have rarock Dr. 4untington Leach, CA 92646 " -..__.._____..__.... Muutinpton beach, CA 92648 "' U13-212-02 df 023-222-•02 df 023-291-47 dt l rt 6 , S tow Dowinick A. Tawaino Bill J. Bresbear,s 19842 Scenic aby Lane 6912 Sooaic bay Lam 7216 Sarensvok Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 flunti:agtaa Beach, CA 92643 Huntington beach, CA 92048 :23-2�.2- 03 df 023-228-03 df 023-291--08 df t.larence S. Carper Thomas H. LilesCharles M. Dorris 19932 Scenic Bey Lane 5822 Scenic Bay 1Granc 7212 aavonrock Dr. iuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,1 y 1)2:3-212-04 df 023-222-04 df 023-291-09 df :caymond Tartburri James A. Boudreau Fussell K. Jadinak , 19822 Scenic Bay Lane 6832 Scenic Bay 14me 7206 Havvenrock Dr. i .iuntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � t j23-212-05 df 023-291-01 df 023-291-10 df Thomas L. Niwry Douglan F. Jeniin John L. Viculin 19812 Scenic flay Lane 7252 Hetvenrock Drive 7202 >Havenrock Dr. Ountington Beach, CA 92648 Iiuntingiton Beach, C'h 96248 Huntington Bauch, Ct_ 92648 023-221-09 df 023-291--02 df 023-291-11 of 'rancis B. Mittendorf Michael L. Mirsch Isabella S. Darta i1131 Scenic Bay Lane 7246 Havenrock Dr. 19891 Saltwater Cir. Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 11untingtcm Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Cal 91648 t 23-221.-33 dr 023--291-03 df 023-291-•12 df aurence M. Baugh Neil Kueharr Robert P. Thiol ' J922 Quiet Surf Circle 7242 Havmrock Dr. 19017 Saltwater Cir. ntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington beach, CA 92648 HuntingtOft beach, CA 92648 3-22a-+34 df 023-291-04 df 023-291-13 df j r gone. R. Ma�khias Emrson K. Nelson Jr. Marshall. J. Sebafler a1 Scenic tray Lases 7236 Navvnx=k Dr. 19861 Raltvator Cir. ntington Beach, CA 92648 Rwtir4ton beach, CA 92641 Huntington beach, CA 92641 00 , I ;1tjL` J tij• E: ,N•�- 4 df 023-291-37 df 023-212-07 a.y�tira ',�. llinva Frank X. Lauterbsr Ernst J. Loughrey •136 Dahlia Drive 7247 tiev+enrock Dr. 19886 Keritiase Lane �rutatti c3c:1 liar, CA 92625 fluntincIton Beach, Cal 92648 Huntington► Beach, CA 92648 '�23`791--1a df 023-291-38 df 023-292--08 d igman La Tourrotte Ralph G. More John R. Schlosser 19071 Saltwater Cir. 8655 Sutter Cir. i520-C 7272 Mast Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 llamtington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington ?Beach, CA 92648 1123• 291-16 df 023-291-39 df 023--292-09 d 1!abart C. Ludlow Beachwalk Howeownors Assn. Robert M. Rasousso n 19867 Saltwater Cir. Loonis Propertiem Inc. 7278 lKast Drive Iuntington beach, CA 12648 P.O. Box 1195 Huntington 84ach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92711 323-291--17 df 023-292-01 df 023•-292-r10 df :`1.11tdaret bic•Clctndon John If. Ryan Richard A. Petersen l'JAG1 Saltwater Cir. 19922 Maritime bane 7282 bast ©rive itu:ntingtun !Beach, CA 92648 Huntington B+aaach , CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 123-291-32 df 023-292-02 df 023-292-11 d>E i;iehard J . Trox1er Robert Brueg47eman Patricia Schneider 1986-1 Saltwater Ur. 2406 Harbor Blvd. Apt. 204 Patricia Taylor Au;ixtington Beach, CA 92648 Costa ftse , CA 92626 P.O. Box Be Grand Canyon AZ 86023 3--291-33 3f 023-292-03 df 023-.292-12 df ,t;unes it. Jeffries Robert U. Tingley John R. blodgett 0666 Saltwater Cir. 19912 Maritime Lane 7292 Mast Drive dkuntina itua ileaelt, CA 926411 liuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,, CA 92648 ? ',23-291-34 df 023-292-04 df 023-292--13 df .toed il. 11001cy , et al Edward V. Ccook Raymond T. Pierson 1906 :Saltwater Cir. 19906 Maritime Lane 7302 Mast Drive Huntington Deacli, Ch 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 11auiting'ton Beach , CA 92648 { �23-191-3 df 023-292-05 df 023-292-14 df .jut:ioy i'. De»annon Bradford D. Johnson John A. Secord �1�#37 Havenrock Ur. 19902 Maeitiaae Lane 7306 Haut Drive ;untington Beach, CA 92640 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ltuntington Beach, CA 92648 rd3-291-36A df 023--292-06 df 023-292-51 di' illy J . Jackson Virginia Xvndall John W. Gorfmvyer 241 llavunrock Ur. 19592 Xaritime Lane 19856 Waterriew Lath utitington Reacct.. CA 92648 Huntington Beach_ CA 92648 111.wtingtora beach: CA 925419 ,s 023- 292-07 df � 01w �� IJ df f f, 3-291-52 df 023-321-12 de U23-321-31 df. 'ra nk J. Palipano 8ioger L. t;aommens Larry L. Du Bois .1862 Wator view Lane 6881 Presidia Dr. 6852 Presidents Dr., .1intington :3oach, CA 96240 Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington beach, CA 92641 �„ 3-dal-53 df 023-321-1.5 df 023-321-33 df M. !imam Brian Burgess John B. Cum&ck • 1072 Materview Lam 6052 Presidio Dr. 6832 Presidente Dr. ,untin -ton ueach, CA 92648 Huntin4ton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92642 j,13-292--54 df 023-321-16 df 023-321-34 df• t ichard L. Jansen Jack W. Weiblen Loren A. Moll 1'19882 Waterview Lane 6842 Presidio Dr. 6822 Presidosnte Dr. `,untinyton lkroch, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,, CA 92648 Huntington !Blear:h, CA 92648 123--292-55 df 02s--321- 0 df 023-321 -37 df' P. Buttera Kenneth P, Caldwell Robert. A. Jansen, at al .643 Dolores Drive 6832 Presidio Dr. 6182 >Presidenke Dr. aradiuo, C11 :)5969 luntington Beach, CA 92648 H=tington Beach, CA 92648 �23-321-02 ,03 df 023-321-19 Of 023-321--40 cif .and Dollar Uev. Inc. Alfred J. Mayer Sand Caftle Raeeorrners Assn 16371 Beach Boulevard 6802 Presidio Dr. . 16371 Deach Blvd. Eta . 240 untington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Bunch, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92547 23-321-04 %lf 023-321--22 df 'j lfonz J. Viszolay Kota G. Chelty ;7dl Presidio ur. 6031 Frosidente Dr . .untingtori 13uach, CA 92648 iluntina,ton Mach, CA 92648 3-321-11G df 023-321.-23 df :ronte li. .Tunes Raonald T. Watanabe r.13u1 11rusidio Ur. 6841 Presidente Dr. 4untin iton Beach, CA 9264U llunlrington Beach, CA 92648 is 3- 1"t 1--U7 df 023--:321.-25 df iarlus L. Grant Striven SevaLsigoon 1121 t'rec3ui o Dr . 6871 Preuidente Dr. iunti noton Death , CA 92464.6 1.1untington boach , Ch. 92646 j23-321-3I dfo 023--321-27 talc "e. Isarri ngcir Pelul M. Albert .371 . Proxidio Ur . 6891 piesidenhe Dr. .utttingthn Deach , CX 92648 Huntington De,ach, Cr& 9264E; tl j "'fie •i'• •-• . .,.�w•�a•r+,a•!+rhw_. :c!'^.1'9f.ry•;+`�'4•rl^,+'v1•.a.Nr».-�..�_.._� --"r.M�MmIIMRi�.'NMtlAI Mn{ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK { 2000 Main MrW t n%W B*wh, California 92649 y i J i, rA f r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 79.5 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a puWic hwtirq will be hold by the City Council of the City of HundnBton Beech, in tM Council Chsftw of the Civic Canter,Huntngton 30sch.at the how of 7.130 p.m..or as scan thweeftar as ; pow*$*.on Monday the 7th d&y of January. ISM,fut tM y Purpaee of corakWins Pteclse Men of Street Allgewswnt No. 79-5.a petition to aeablish a 70 foot►illttof�wey Jill PWIM ? Avenue between Savoi +th and Gakf+nwttt StrWIL Negative decieretion No.79-65 will be considered In conjunction with this application. A level desmiptbn is on file in the Dovedopmerrt Swslcert Dap�ert n+an t. All interested pennons are inithed to•hand said ?oaring and ezpreet thek apirdant for nr egdnst laid Pmciw Man of Street Alignment No.71-5. Further information may be obtained frorn the Office of the City Clw%,7J00 Mein Stseall,Huntington Beech,Ca. 17141 53&F',227 Dated: December 26, 1979 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BY:ALICIA M.WWENTIMORTH City Clerk Wit. naing Hunt,B+eed+ Ind, !a i TP [.,fo � CITY OFH�1M7"OWTON NMMCH INTfA•DEPART►�iENT COMMUNICATION MAIV41c"Wcft pop 0 Floyd G. Belsito Coo vTo FrornE� Subject Precise Plan. of Street Alignment Date Sept. 251 1979 Palm Ave . from Goldenwest St, to Seventeenth St. I have studied the request from Mr. Bob Carona dated 9/1 for a reduction in the master planned right of way width on Pasr� .�R Ave. between Goldenwest and Seventeenth from 80 feet to the ex4 �,,s":,'ng request can be 70 feet. I feel this re q approved without creati.ng.l future traffic t af:fi o ..pr blems , . ., Palm Ave. is classified as a secondary arterial highway between Goldenwest and Seventeenth. West of Goldenwest, Palm is classified as a primary arterial highway and east of Seventeenth, Palm is classified as. a local street. Previous traffic studies project an ultimate average. daily traffic volume of 12,000 to 15,000 vehicles per day. This is well within the capacity of a secondary arterial highway. The normal cross-section of a secondary arterial highway is 80 feet of right of way with 64 feet of pavement and 13 foot parkways an each side. Within the 64 feet of pavement are four 12 foot travel lanes aad two 8 foot parking and/or bicycle lanes . If this request was granted to maintain the existing right of way at 70 feet, we would propose a street width of 54 feet which would ultimately break down into four 10 foot travel lanes and two 7 foot bicycle lanes . Since there will be no direct vehicular access along Palm except at intersections , there is no need of providing parking lanes between Goldenwest and Seventeenth. However, the bicycle lanes can be used for emergency parking. Since the existing street width on Palm is 52 feet, the developer of the south side of Palm will be required to widen it to 54 feet. There is some doubt in our minds that traffic volumes on this section of: Palm will reach the level projected in the studies . However,: if volumes do reach that point, they can be adequately handled within the capacity of the SA foot street width described above. Until volumes on Palm Avenc7A reach a point where four travel lanes are necessary, it would be striped - for two,. travel lanes with left turn pockets at its intersections with Goldenwe--L and Seventeenth. RFCI�iKMENDATION ' recommendation that the City Council direct the , Planning g P It is my recoramenda Commission to begin roceedings.,.,for: a Precise ,Plan e of Street Aligrwnent creating an ultimate right of way width of 70 feet . ior Palm Ave, be- tween Goldenwest and Seventeenth Street . au Ply:jY Director of Public: Works ; MTV CW H INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �� wcx�w«rn To Floyd G. Belsito , From Engineer.ing Staff City Administrator Subject PALM AVENUE--GOLDENNEST STREET Date September 14 , 1979 TO SEVENTEENTH STREET Statement of Issue : , potent a developer has requested a reduction in the width of },e1m Avenue and relief from the 25 foot corner cutoff requirement because the 10 foot dedication and the corner cutoff adversely affect his development plans . Analysis : Palm venue is classified a secondary arterial highway east of Golden- west Street and a primary arterial highway west of Goldenwest Street. Ultimately , Palm Avenue will extend westerly and connect to the south- erly extension of Bolsa Chica Street . Previous traffic studies Indi - cate an ultimate Average Daily Traffic (ADT) demand of 12 ,000 to 15 , 000 vehicles per day . This demand is well within the capacity of a second- ary arterial highway. The northerly half of Palm Avenue has been dedicated to 40 feet and improved. The southerly half is dedicated to 40 feet between Goiddn- west Street and 22nd Street. The remaining southerly portions of Palm Avenue between22nd Street and 17th Street remain at 30 feet from centerline . The attached asses ,ior ' s parcel maps show the area in question. The intent of providing a 25 foot corner cutoff as required by the Municipal Code is to provide sufficient visibility to approaching ve- hicles at intersections . Any change in the basis for measuring the corner cutoff should inclide an analysis of intersection sight distance so that traffic safety is not compromised . Discussion : . Itr s Fe R that the developer ' s request for relief from the 10 foot dedication of right-of-way is reasonable as long as no vehiclular access is allowed from the developed parcels to Palm Avenue. Projected tr3ffic ::voluoes can be handled with a 52 foot street width if no parking is allowed. Additional street width is necessary near the intersection of .Palm' and Goldenwest because of needed left turn storage at the :.traf fic signal . However , previous right-of-way dedication has made this widening possible . It should. be ,po,inttd out that .controlled'feet access ' on PalmAvenue makes the reduced .right-of-way of -TO o a secondary highway feasible. Careful study should be done before relief from additional right-of-way , dedication on Polo easterly of 17th Street is granted. Floyd 6 . 8llSito -2- September 14 , 197� .. 1 ,Recomeendation : - 1 . Retain tw, existing classification of Palm Avenue between 17th and 6oldenwest as a secondary arterial highway. However, the Ta foot right-of-way under access controlled conditions will accommodate the traffic demands of this secondary highway . 2 • Retain the 25 foot corner cutoff requirement unless the developer can provide a detailed proposal which will not compromise traffic safety . Funding Source : N-67Tty fundsare required unless additional study is requested . Attachments t. CITY 4F HunflnGTon BEACH .rJJ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT M NT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION (714)53M41 PLJ%NNING DIVISION (714153"271 P. 0, Box 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA UW ow TOt Honorable Mayor and City Council 17 ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City .Administrator � - FROM: Department of Development Services ,�► LATE: September 12, 1979 c" P SUBJECT: Huntington Beach Letter dated September 7, 1979 Bob Corona Letter dated September 10 , 1979 Mr. Belsito has requested that the Department of Development Services analyze the request as stated in the Huntington Beach Company' s letter regarding the reduction in the ultimate right-of--way width of Palm Avenue and the request for a modification to the 25' by 25 ' corner cutoff on residential development as specified in Bob Corona ' s letter. The Huntington Beach Company is asking for a reduction in the ultimate right-of-way width on Palm Avenue from its present designation as a Secondary Arterial Highway (801 width) to its existing 70 foot right- of-way width. The staff has reviewed General plan Amendment 76-1, A and B, for documentation on the traffic projections for Palm Avenue between 17th and 23rd Streets. The information on the justification for the deletion of Palm Avenue from the Circulation Element from 17th to Lake Street is somewhat sketchy and did not identify ultimate traffic projections for the portion retained on the Circulation Element from 17th to 23rd Streets. We have not at this time had an opportunity to analyze the past traffic studies conducted in the area for traffic projections on this portion of Palm; however if the Traffic Engineer- ing Division concurs that four lanes can be designed into a 50-foot width face-of-curb 1:o face-of-curb and that traffic conditions will not ultimately exceed the traffic projections for a properly designed street to accommodate such traffic, the Council could refer the item _ back to staff for additional research and recommendation. (To date, the projects constructed on the north side of Palm between 17th and 23rd are private communities with limited access, and demonstrate no need for parking to take place at the curb on that side of Palm Avenue, which is a plus for the request as submitted. ) In Bob Corona's September 10 letter it is implied that there is flexi- bility in the code to. interpret the 25/25 corner cutoff as being other than measured from property line to property line. This, however, has been the method of providing this corner cutoff for many :years, and the staff does not feel that the provisions of the code are 'open to, inter- pretation as it seems quite clear as to how: the code describes that; these areas should be measured. The staff has I -met- with Mr. Corona #a discuss sane alternative modifications '.to the plans which would alter►, his : o move ahead with his projects , but I understand that these modi- fications are unacceptable to him at this time. In our metings the t , I September 12, 1979 Page 2 Department indicated that we concurred with consideration of a change in the method of measuring these corner cutoffs and that we felt the curb-to-curb measurement had merits however, we also indicated to Mr. Corona. that the Traffic Engineer would have to endorse this concept and that the code would have to be amended prior to the issuance of buildin Mr. Corona could file for g .permits or that in the alternative a conditional exception to the Board of Zoning Adjustments to request a waiver of this requirement. In these conversations we told him that we could not recall ever having granted an exception to waive the corner cutoff and that the Department would have to take a position recommending denial of a request of this nature. The reason that we felt that a change in the method of measurement might be Justified was because of the varying parkway widths existing in. the City, from some old 15-foot parkways to the more recent 6-foot sidewalk areas (parkways) . By using the universal measurement of curb-to-curb we would realize the same building setback on every piece of property within the City, as measured from curb line. If the City Council feels that the proposal has merit, you can instruct the staff to prepare a Code Amendment effecting the new method of measurement . At this point, there is no relief that the Council can grant Mr. Corona on the present method of measurement; however, he certainly has the option of filing to the BZA for relief from this pro- vision of Division 9 . RECOWUNDATIONS: 1.. Huntington Beach Company request -- September 7 , 1979 a. Refer back to staff for additional research and F nda#��)W1��a) b. Notifythe Huntington Beach Company that it is entit e� file 9 P Y a petition for a precise plan of street alignment effecting the reduction in the ultimate width to its existing 70 feet . 2. Bob Corona letter - September 10 , 1970 a . Instruct the staff to prepare a code amendment effecting the measurement of the 25/25 foot ,cph ,$utof_f from curb to curb. b. NotifyMr. Corona that he may Me a conditional exception Y application to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for relief from the present corner cutoff requirements. spectfull "i �e W. Palin, Director JMP:df Attachments Hoi4 Co letter - 9-7-74 Bob!`Corona letter -• 9-10-79 Cody: Sections 9356 .4 (c) (2) 9700.17(b) !'I.A .INC TOWN1.0'r SPECIFIC PLAN - AftL+ t�l>+ 8. 9396.4(iii) Further provided where the main accasn to a dvell[ng is taken from a side yard, said area abutting the wain accensway shall be not less than five (5) feet for the first story. (3) Minimum Rear Yard Setback. Rear yards for all main buildings shall have a minimum setback of seven and one-half ( 7h) -feet. A cantilever, not exceeding five (5) feet in pernitte+d for any part of a structure above the first floor double plate. (b) Accessory Buildings (1) Front YMd Setbrtck. The minimuth front yard setback shall be twenty-two 22 feet except that garages which side an the front yard may b.1 set back not leas than ten ( 10) feet. " (2) Minimum Side Yard Setback. Except as provided herein, the apgreg'ate setback shall be not leas than 20 percent of the Rite frontage and is minimum of three (3 ) feet shall be provided in each side yard. ( i) Any side yard abutting a public street shall have a setback of not less than five ( 5) feet, except for garages located on ra niggle, twenty-five (25) foot wide lot, said setback may be reduced to not less than three (3) feet . (ii) Any side yard not abutting an arterial or local street may be reduced to zero provided that the side yard area reduced by this procedure is made up on the opposite side yard of the site . Further provided where zero side yard setback is used, the Abutting site roust be hold under the same ownership at the time of initial construction or the owners of the abutting properties record agreement or deed restriction and consent in writing to such zero setback. A separation of not less than five (5) feet shall be provided between facing structures on ahutting sites where zero side setback is utilized. This requirement shall not apply whe_rr, the same interior property line is utilized for zero side yard construction on both sides. ( NO O Further provided wliere the main access to a dwe l 1 i ng is taken from a aide yard, said area nhutting the main accessway shall be not less than five (5) feet for the first story. • (3) Minimum Rear Yard Setback. hear yards for accessory buildings shall have a minimum setback of sevi•n and niie-half ( 1S) feet. (c) Fences, Halls and Hedges. Fends, wa) l s and hedges which do not exceed six (6) feet in height may he Incnted on any portion of the site except within the front and rear yard areas nob ject to the following limitations: (1 ) Corner Site. Fencett or rails whice do not exceed six (6) feet in height may be erected in the exterior side yard of a corner site provided they are not closer than twenty-five (75) feet to the front property line. (2 ) Street Intersection. Within a triangular area formed by seasuring twenty-five (25) fret along the exterior side site lines of the corner rite, there shall be not less than 90 pr!rccnt unobstructed vision between forty-two (42) inches above grade to and including seven ( 7) feet above grade. (3) Corner Site Abuttint an Allel. Within a triangular area formed by t , measuring ten 10 feet along an alley and exterior side site Un4s, there shall be no structuresv fence, volt , hedge, or landscaping or Rtructuret earttetetd or maintained over forty-twos (42) inches in height. OP t/2�/7!► S. 1700.IS h„�1 ,�_ GENERAL PROVISIONS PLANNING (h) Trailer Coach. A trailer coach is a vehicle, other than a motor vehicle, designe or man habitation, or human occupancy for industrial , professional , or comerital purposes for carrying property on its own structure, and for being drawn by a motor vehicle. (i ) Tick Tractor. A truck tractor is a ►rotor vehicle designed and used primarily r raw ng other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than a part of the weight of the vehicle and load so drawn. S. 9700.16 Words beginning with th% letters "P" and "Q" shall have the following definitions : 6 (a) ' Parallel Parkins. Parking which is immediately adjacent to and parallel to t e edge of a private or public: roadway or driveway. (1563 - 3/70) (b) Planned Residential Development. A land development designed and developed as a unit for individual ownership of dwelling units or sites or air space rights in the area occupied by said dwelling units , with nomial accessory, residential uses , and permanently maintained conmon property with each resident having 'an un- divided interest in the common area for use as parks, waterways , golf courses, or other, recreation areas that are integrated with the dwelling units for the sole en- joyment of residents within the development. (1563 - 3/70) (c) Private Club or Lode shall mean any facility or meeting place of an organization requiring bona fie membership, (1853 - 6/73) S. 9700. 17 Words beginning with the letter "S" shall have the following definitions: (a) Service Station shall mean any retail business which offers for sale petroleum pr ducuc s, automobile accessories and replacement parts; and includes among its services automobile washing by hand, waxing and polishing. (1673 - 11/71 ) (b) Site shall mean the legally created parcel of land bounded by property lines after dedication. (2221 - 9177) (c ) Site Coverage shall mean the building area of the site measured from an imaginary, vertical projection of the surface area encompassed within the exterior walls or from the centerline of walls separating two buildings. All roofed , covered structures including garages and parking structures , stairways, corridors, balcony projections, and covered patios shall be included. ( 2221 - 9/71) (d) S ec is 1 Event shall mean a temporary use of property not exceeding an aggregate ' of twenty-one (21 ) calendar days a year, the purpose of which is to conduct a specialized, outdoor short-term event such as, but not limited to, art shows, fundraising events , amusement attractions and sporting events. (e) . Structure. Anything constructed eorroundt or attached the use otowhich reougnires more . _�.. or ess permanent location n g g d or attached to swethiiV having a fixed location on the ground. f) Stall shall mean a conpartmnt for one equine in a stable. �g Stallion shall mean a ' male horse attaining the a.ge of two (2) caltndar 'years. _ i s t .a .. 40 untington chJ Cornpary t110MAIN s/'11llET.IaMTINGYCW MACH.CALIFWINM 17141 96604M1 X.A.rOl1N0 VICE PRESIDENT•OtNE RAI.MANA01 A September 71 1979FP '+�'NUli111�r�0N PALM AVENUE ti RIGHT OF WAY 1' I „r Mr:.' Cron MacAllister Mayor City of Huntington Leach ; 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , Ca.92648 Dear Mr. MacAllister: 1� We recently learned that Palm Avenue is shown on the Circulation Element of the General. Plan as a Secondary Highway between 17th Street and Goldenwest Street. Thies came ae -a surprise to us, since we were render the ifipression that: Palm Avenue was deleted from the Circulation Element as a Secondary Highway in March, 1976 . As you know, weown the lots ,aiding onto Palm Avenue and the widening of the street would result in the loss of 10 feet of these 25 foot wide lots . Palm Aveinae is lieve that widening the streetan7addititonalf10afeetWwoul& be t at. q an unnecessary and needless cost to the city for the following reasons: 1 . Past traffic studies have not demonstrated a need for the additional right of way. 2 . The .present street,;wiath (curb to curb) in 50 fret which sill accams�xla ;. nte.A, lanes of traffic. If ;tiaff"ic' :.. conditions ixceedark o3sctiant, ; this can be ac:c�iaplishad by eliminat ng p ing. on -both sides of the. street. This action is feasible because no lots front Oh Papa. Avenue. They either back up, to the street on the north side or side-on along the south side. Mr, Doti MacAllister Pa'a x Se tii�ber 7, 1979, / } 71 >rendAr these lots:'. value].ass e>s' building nitias which will t.4 a needless 'cost to t.1 * ' city for a'cq�Asiti.on r � r In ..view of this,,, we respectfully request the cite to irl ,tiet'� action that will, allow Palm Avenue to remain at its,f,grerient ' width. Very Y trul yours, --1001 SAY/h I. JJ , { 'J! is :f i „ .r 7699 LrBSItTY IlYaiitUF >> NVNTINGTON BRACE; `CALM~', , 92647 1! 3EPTamw 1o, 19,19 r� 1 r WUMTINCTON 62ACH CITY COUNCIL CITY` MLL !? ; HUNTiNGTON HBACl:; n'ALrF. , 92648 DEAR',NR Ml-10A A11D MBMBERS OF THE COUNCIL: EAALIlft4THIS 'SUI A;';A';G CUP OF LOCAL INVESTORS t REPRFSENTEp;'BY US SNTBRBD`INTO as owo HUNTXNQTOKAG REENEXT, WITH THE': NBIC CH ;ITINGTON �WASC OUR TINTENTHTO�4CONSTRUCrIQUALITYE I 7SIxGLE AMILY gbUS ON THESE LOTS IN�'ACCORDANCE 'MITH, THE .CZTY!S1�RSZONINCi OF THE AREA:,70''R-1• ,,. TOE THIS` 0611,WE± COWISSIONED.'AN ARCHITECT, . ta'LEE TWO06`'JOINE,t, TO DRAW PLANS IOp,. "CONSTRUCTION. ; i�fE:'DILIGENTLY COORDINATED: EACH 'STRP WITH THE APPROPRIATE CXTY DEPARTMENTS AND WERE AMURED ON AN ONGOING BASIS THAT THEF1 WERE NO PRDBLLM Is OUR PLANS AS WE MOVED TOWARD ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PEIIMITS; ME WER!o T1lEHEORE, 8UR Pkl:$E:D AND DISMAYED, WHEN Two MAJOR PROBLEMS WERE UNCOVERI.D DURING FINAL CHECK OF PLANS, .1r f30LDEK -THAT -SIDE SCHBD��N',,17?H''AND THE.FIRS THE r D TO 8E ,,WIDENE;D AN iJfADDITIONAL 10 FEET; THIS, OF COURSE, WOULD PREVENT US FROM! BUILDING OM�TNUE LOTS, WE HAD,,SPECIFICALLY INQUIRED OF PUBLIC WORKS ABOUT ADDITIONAL DBDICATIONS ON 'PALM ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS AND WERE ASSURED THAT THERE WERE WOME. THR :SECOW�PROBLim' CONCERNS 'THE'SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR CORNER LOTS, THE PLANNING DEI'ARTMENY IKTERPfiESS THE CITY CODE TO .REQUIRE A 25 FOOT WANER CUT 'OFF MEASURED FROM THE 'lP90PERTY LINE. ARAINo WE HAD SPECIFICALLY ASKED: ABOUT THE CORKER CUTOFF AEQUIRENENTS ANI) WERE ASSURED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS THAT OUR PLANS WERE ACCEPTABLE IN 1TIIS REGARD. THESE 11TH HOUR CHANGES CAUSE US,,CONSIDERABLE CONCERN AND DI&I.CULTY SINCE WE HIVE SPENT; SUBSTANTIAL SUMS OF MONF.7, ARRANGED FOR CONSTRUCTION FINANCING, ETC. , AND ARE READY TO START CONSTRUCTION. "1, ! :�:4: • ��,• �;:. is MITH`R=ARD TO THE;i,';10. Foot WIDENING OF PALM Sr, , WE CONCUR WITH THE "COMMMS OF THE.,HUNTIX TON 'BEACH COMPANY,AND FEEL THAT THE ADDITIONAL WIDENING IS UNNICESSARTs WE URGE'. YOU TO ALLOW THE STREET TO REINAIN IN THE PRESENT STATUS AND THAT YOU AUTHORIZE THE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERV.ICB TO ISSUE OUR PERMITS. ;WITH: REGARD• TO, THE;CORNER',f;UT-OFF I WE ,FEEL, THAT THE PRESENT INTEXPREPTATION IS UN- NECIISSARILY` AESTRICTIVE AIID .THAT THE 14ORE UNIVERSAL 'CURB TO CURB' INTERPRETATION +OFF THIS CODE SECTION SHWtD BE USED, THE BUILDING DEPART14ENT HAS INDICATED CON- CURRBNCE WITH THIS POSITIQN, WE UNDERSTAND THAT' THE MORE RBSTRICTIVE'INTERPRETATION, IS A LETTOYER FROM THE DAYS O!- THE f ROLLING STOP' WHEN GREATER VISUAL CLEARANCE WAS IMPERATIVE. .` ;TO OUR ` KKOMLE DGE, THERE ARE NO LONGER ANY ,FOUR-WAY, INTEEISECTIONS WITHOUT STOP SIGNS IN TlU AREA WHICH MEANS THE STRICT INTERPRETATION IS OUTDATED, r .7�?r°r .ij` It r''YF�N1 7'.5:, �f f:'�' rvC,}3'�,�,"je , -.r'r,.'� �JJfrlrF:{77•L� 1 (a.� �. tiff .t i• �.1•` "� . .: 1 :, �':. .". ,. " TIr �'lFiI9 xP'RO!lL.�M�'CAMNCT 861l894L.VRp; !� ,1�10►tk.D, IiAVR. 'i'O� RI'IKiR. SNOR!'6M Tl�S. titilLdIlKls Brr'�4�litT Ot� '!,CLi?!,.A".CORONA ,OFJP Tti6�?XONT M THB� BUILDING WS RRtL Tiut,,tTriNRlt i 'or. ,'T an "'ACTIOM!!'VOULD`Dl TRACT.9UBSTAMALLY PRAM THE PRODUCT ANti as 'CoaftA 'T8 THR ANTENT. 01V THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN, IT, RBZONED Tmg'-'Alt A' IM Rmi LAST` TSAR.. AGAIN, MIX ASK THAT YOU INITIATE ACTION TO MSOLVB THIS ;PROBLEM 30 WE CAN =Cgl ,?m PIiRMITS AND PROCUD KITH CONSTRUCTION ON A TIMRLY AND COST R"ItC?IVR L43130 Wt 'MUD YOUR KELP f H 3FICTFULLY 3UBMITTED, �l n 440 ti� �r rrwr• / 7�r rl rr�i r���1• Y YrY�rsfiiwilirr 1 LAYNE R. NEUCART ROBRRT L CORONA ERIC It. TURSHMAN e