Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPrecise Plan of Street Alignment PPSA 92-2 (R) - Mitigated N APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, REQUEST.FOR CITY COUNCIL AC e t P 0 w CITY UM K Date: March 21, 1994 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City sua Prepared by: Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development-11;16q Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2 (R) MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8 (R) Consistent with Council Policy? [XI Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception C a 3 Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative,Actions,Attachments: 21.2 STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Q,.,,,,w ,�G : s0Z Transmitted for your consideration is a request to establish a precise alignment of Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. The proposed alignment will allow for additional right-hand and left-hand turn lanes, landscape improvements and bus turnouts. The alignment is required to improve traffic flow, aesthetically enhance the area and to accommodate future commercial expansions of up to 500,000 square feet. The request requires either dedication of private property or acquisition of private property by the City for right-of-way use. Staff is recommending approval because the Plan is in conformance with both the General Plan and Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan's goals and policies for this economically vital commercial corridor. The proposed improvements will create a cohesive image and aide in the revitalization of the Edinger Corridor. On February 15, 1994, the Planning Commission concurred with Staff s recommendation and approved the street widening proposal by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1488 approving Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) with findings. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: "Adopt Ordinance No.---- (Attachment No. 4) and approve precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) for street widening purposes with findings of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 3." PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON FEBRUARY 15. 1994: THE MOTION MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECONDED BY INGLEE, TO APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8 (R) WITH FINDINGS CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COOK, GORMAN, DETTLOFF, RICHARDSON NOES: BIDDLE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NEWMAN MOTION PASSED THE MOTION MADE BY RICHARDSON, SECONDED BY INGLEE, TO APPROVE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2 (R) WITH FINDINGS CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: COOK, GORMAN, DETTLOFF, RICHARDSON NOES: BIDDLE ABSTAIN: NONE ABSENT: NEWMAN MOTION PASSED ANALYSIS: Overview: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) is intended to improve existing traffic flow, visually enhance the area and accommodate future commercial development of up 500,000 square feet. The precise plan will act as a guide for proposed improvements that may either be initiated by the City or required to be dedicated as conditions of approval for future development. Edinger Avenue is proposed to be widened from an existing right-of-way of 100' with a 84' curb- to-curb dimension, three (3) lanes of through travel in both directions and seven (7) bus stops to an ultimate right-of-way width of 119.9', not accounting for bus turnouts, and a curb-to-curb dimension of 95'. The improvements proposed in Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2 (R) include three (3) lanes of through travel in both directions, six (6) bus turnouts and seven (7) new turn lanes (For more details please see the attached report entitled "Precise Plan of Street Improvements for Edinger Avenue, Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard" prepared by Norris- Repke, Inc.). RCA 3/21/94 2 ppsarca His The development of the precise plan for Edinger Avenue began in 1989 with the Edinger Corridor Study. This was followed by the Huntington Beach Center Signage and Orientation Workshop in June of 1990 and the Huntington Center Revitalization Workshop in December of 1990. In 1992, Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2 in conjunction with Environmental Assessment 92-8 was submitted. This submittal included General Plan Amendment 92-1 and Environmental Assessment No..92-26. Due to the fact that the proposed street widening, excluding the bus turnouts, does not exceed 120' (Total 119%the general plan amendment and environmental assessment requests were not required and were withdrawn(See Attachment No. 5). The street widening project has been delayed since the original submittal in order to address concerns of the property and business owners in the area. The project before you today has been modified to incorporate their concerns. Due to these modifications and the length of time since the previous environmental review, the negative declaration, which was previously prepared, was recirculated and one additional comment from Cal Trans was received (See Attachment No. 8). Existing Conditions: Edinger Avenue is designated as a Primary Arterial by the Orange County Master Plan of Highways. This designation allows a 100'-120' right-of-way and 4-6 lanes of travel. Currently, Edinger Avenue consists of a 100' right-of-way, 84' curb to curb dimension, three (3) lanes of through travel in both directions and seven (7) bus stops including one (1) bus turnout. Currently, Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard operates at a Level of Service (LOS)B and handles average daily traffic levels of approximately 39,000 vehicles*. The street segment is currently able to handle average daily traffic levels of 56,300 vehicles and still maintain a LOS E. With projected commercial development of 500,000 square feet, an additional 25,000 vehicle trips would be generated (50 vehicle trips per 1,000 sq. ft. of regional commercial development). These new trips would push the Level of Service to 64,000 average daily trips and a LOS of F. However, the proposed improvements would not improve the LOS noticeably. The improvements to the traffic flow brought about by the proposed widening cannot be factored into the LOS results. This proposal will improve traffic flow by improving turning movements and eliminating the conflict between buses and traffic. *Roadway Segments,Table C-4,Technical Background Report for General Plan Update, Envicom Corp. RCA 3/21/94 3 ppsarca General Plan Conformity: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) is in conformance with the primary arterial street classification. This classification allows for a street width of 100'to 120'. The proposed width for Edinger Avenue, accounting for through lanes and left-hand turn lanes, does not exceed 119.9 feet. In addition, Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) is in conformance with the following goals and policies of the general plan: ❑ Land Use 1. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) conforms to the community appearance goals (Goal 3.4.2.1)by improving the landscaping in the area. 2. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) adheres to the commercial development goals (Goal 3.4.2.8)by promoting the development of the facilities necessary to support and revitalize the Edinger corridor area. ❑ Circulation 1. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) adheres to the goal to provide for safe and efficient movement of goods and people (Goal 3.1.2.1) by eliminating the conflicts between buses and other turning vehicles with through traffic. 2. Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) supports the establishment of a public transportation system (Goal 3.1.2.2.1)by providing safe bus turnouts and bus stops. Finally, the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC)has commented on the importance of the Edinger Corridor area to the economic well being and identity of the City. The GPAC has noted that the inconsistent street scene and lack of a cohesive image act as a detriment to the revitalization of the area. The GPAC is recommending that the area be upgraded and improved and Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) is consistent with that recommendation. Redevelopment: Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2 (R) addresses the following issues identified in the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan: • Improves traffic flow and circulation patterns by consolidating curb cuts which reduce conflicts of turning vehicles with through traffic; by providing bus turnouts which reduce conflicts between buses with through traffic; and by creating a comprehensive signalization program. • Improves the physical appearance by providing comprehensive landscaping improvements. • Helps to stimulate and assist the private sector in the rehabilitation of commercial land by providing a vision for the whole area. RCA 3/21/94 4 ppsarca Potential Impacts: The proposed street widening requires the acquisition of a total of 45,248 square feet of property; 41,473 square feet from the north side and 3,775 square feet from.the south side of Edinger Avenue. The Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Edinger Avenue dated May 1993 provides suggested improvements that mitigate the impacts to surrounding properties resulting from the increased right-of-way. If the suggested improvements are utilized, no net loss of parking will occur in the project area. However, three properties (Goodyear, Security Pacific and JC Penny/Broadway) will suffer a. total loss of 10 parking spaces even with the suggested improvements. Only the loss of parking on the Goodyear property has the potential to create any impacts. The Security Pacific and JC Penny/Broadway properties share parking with Huntington Center and any loss would be insignificant. The Goodyear property is currently nonconforming due to parking and the proposed bus turnout would result in a loss of three more spaces. The existing code requires 41 parking spaces while only 20 spaces are provided. However, when the Goodyear property was developed in 1966,the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code required one (1)parking space per 500 square feet-or 17 spaces. With the suggested improvements, the additional right-of-way required for a bus turnout would result in a loss of three spaces and the 17 spaces would be satisfactory to ordinance codes in existence at the time the property was developed.. In the unlikely case that the street widening occurred and no on-site parking improvements were implemented,there is a potential to lose a total of 263 parking spaces in the project area. The following is a list of the properties and potential impacts of this worst case scenario: Potential Number of Property Lost Parking Spaces Levitz 71 Security Pacific 27 Goodyear 12 Wells-Fargo 42 Unoccupied at Huntington Center 77 JC Penny/Broadway 34 Total 263 It is important to remember that the proposed improvements will be imposed during redevelopment of the properties or under.mutually agreeable circumstances. Therefore, this scenario is unlikely and is given for statistical purposes only. RCA 3/21/94 5 ppsarca Seven signs may be affected by the proposed street widening and would require relocation at the time the improvements specified in Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2 (R) are implemented. The following is a list of the signs that would be required to be relocated: North Side South Side Levitz/Sportmart(15'pole sign) Rich Donuts (7' Monument Sign) Levitz Sign(4' Pole Sign) Huntington Center Sign(6' Monument Sign) Montgomery Ward Entrance Huntington Center Sign (6' Monument Sign) Parkside Ln. Entrance Huntington Center Sign(6' Monument Sign) Sher Ln. Entrance Environmental Status: Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2(R) is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration 92-8(R) which the Council must certify tonight. Many of the impacts outlined in the Negative Declaration, such as disruption to normal circulation patterns and emergency access, increased noise levels and impacts to air quality (See Attachment No. 7), are short term in nature and are a consequence of construction. The mitigation measures required by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) will address these impacts (See Attachment No. 8) SUMMARY The need to improve circulation patterns and the physical appearance of the Edinger corridor is vitally important to Huntington Beach. The Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan and the General Plan Advisory Committee have cited the lack of a cohesive image as a major detriment to the economic well being of the area. Staff feels that the benefits of the improvements outweigh the potential impacts to the corridor. The potential short term construction impacts and disruptions will be mitigated by the measures required in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R). Given the fact that the improvements will not be made without property owner approval or without redevelopment of the affected properties, the potential long term impacts to specific properties, such as parking or signage relocation, will be mitigated during that time. FUNDING SOURCE: Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan RCA 3/21/94 6 ppsarca ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may overturn the Planning Commission's action on February 15, 1994 by denying Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) and Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) for Edinger Street widening purposes with findings (Attachment No. 9). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Reduced Site Plans 3. Findings for Approval 4. Ordinance No. ------ 5. Memorandum from Jim Otterson, Bruce Gilmer and Tony Folaron dated September 3, 1993 6. Letter from Southern Pacific Railroad Lines dated September 11,1992 7. Letter from Freeway Industrial Park dated February 1, 1994 8. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) 9. Draft Alternative Findings for Denial 10. Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Edinger Avenue, Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard dated May 1993,prepared by Norris-Repke, Inc. MTU:MI'Apip RCA 3/21/94 7 ppsarca r ORDINANCE NO. v . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 9061,DISTRICT MAPS 15 AND 26 THEREOF TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET - ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R) ALIGNING EDINGER AVENUE BETWEEN GOTHARD STREET AND A POINT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD WHEREAS,pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, as found in California Government Code Section 65493 et seq.,the Huntington Beach Planning Commission, after notice duly given, held a public hearing on February 15, 1994 to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard; and On April 6 1994, after notice duly given, a public hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to consider said Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R); and The City Council finds that the Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R) is reasonable and necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly development of the community, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the real property described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein is hereby approved and adopted as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. SECTION 2. That District Map 15 (Sectional District Map 14-5-11) and District Map 26 (Sectional District Map 23-5-11) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, collectively attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated as though fully set forth herein, are hereby amended to include the aforesaid Precise Plan of Streeet Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. SECTION 3. That the Director of Community Development is hereby directed to amend the aforesaid District Maps to reflect Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92- 2(R) and file said maps with the City Clerk,who will maintain them for public inspection. 1 4\Edinger\03/1 1/94 SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. .PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a>�a.�° ea meeting thereof held on the 6t-day of April , 1994. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City�Clerk� ,W-4ity Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED: +I , Ij A/ ,' ir' ctor of Co e opment City A imstrator 2 4\Edinger\03/1 1/94 4 PLANNING ZONING DIM SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 23-5-11 1.",. E T. OPTED Aii 1. .960 CITY OF ADiii E NO 754 -g -E L —s HUNTINGTON BEACH 2" .1 :122 t-1•L.Si u I-n .3- ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2 12 1 72 72, Ei w r EDINGER 1 .00 U MI C2 C4 C 2 C 2 C�4 �'-i C4 I l _ — Ft I R3 r .4 OR R 3 vOLGA DR RI R 3 —AVE —it - 5-ONE.0 0!, R 3 R3 'R R 1 11 RI AMAZON DR R3 -4m 1- rC—AiT CJR 04 t CF-C L:R�� 1I ". .76 st M I m I T. R I T JJ I : A. N Lk ST I Ali CR ml-T R I 1 CF—E R3 C4 Rl RI RI R I! MA=NALD NE JUL] L —E 111.0.21 ea 1 R 2 C4. R.I -�E RI -4 DY RI tRI RIcLENcoE RI ALNAMBRA OR C4 R3 1 /7 DANUBE DR RI It RI RI 3 PR3 LJ�j 5 RI R 3 MI , C 4 m I SEINE R 11 C 4 RI ml IRI RI DON RI A....... CF—E oi 0 C2 IRS) C m I J M I ...........j —J� m CF—R I[!AIR3 MI 0 r D 0 C C R3 R 2 z C4 C 2 R3__ : ,r R3 =R3 410 F;2 4 ----------------- L WO ARNER AvE ZONING DM 15 CTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5-II -'- CITYOF - - - -_ _ :� )Dwt.4 '••.r4:r..4.•D ... ADOPTED duw[ 20,Iff0 'a•",[won+o[••t"c,c•,[u+-te Dr fu[.••4•'D•r• -'r � LEGEND CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 773 .r[rD[D I,SI i+W:Iq �.i�„Yar�r[:1 u•�r4 DC'r,'y HUNTINGTON BEACH `r`" -.a•a-ao ,n ,.4 �[:cwww". . ESS o-s!- )-r4-si •e eri ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ,µ.+: •n4•a rtlt Imo.'i•t:.:c�'•.l.Det.b•c a,.. - �2•E-'[SM[C rw2Dri �r-:..V.M r.•)'w.'! K-'.-f3 f3-i0 2!1a e•n-fa r,-s razz ,*O ru,¢Sot raaa arfa w)afaa ru, _ f ra f,-2 SYHr i - BCLSA AVE J L 1I _ ' I I ( m L I = III y Crtr _ OF _WESTrINSTER -- �I n•;N T.Ni70. BE Ac' RI %I li WMITNET DR - < —A n,A, •\'E �- I RI c[ [Kr[S+ a LEOOrl war RI ! �4 _ R Mw a A✓E t .oc.r[c[ w[ I! o + O 1 VIZ s O ji 4 f381,' i NIN � I MI'*r Or wCST•Aik STE4 � V ,t[q1. tuaA1l CITY - ,b- RI —INSTER R IRI I� L 11 c �• _R I i �'ay NORTH HUNTINGTON ,I NORTH HUNTNGTON CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN CF—E _ a '\ uu C4-MS z - - CENTER S.w ',z} if"A' ?C4;MI C2 C2 i c:s C2 cr $ ' •---- ......... --'-'-----...._"y-"'------•-••--• -...... .... -. i +C4 e r[w[v[nu•n Ca h[fV'- M a Z - 3 I i � DI row-.r[-rae• I i I .;o' Dl uo•or)r.-urn' ,o m V I i Y D. w— ooll EDINGER AV ))',. Edinger Avenue Precise Plan Road Improvement Boundary Description A strip of land 109 feet(109')wide being fifty-nine feet(59')northerly and fifty feet(50') southerly of a line known as the centerline of Edinger Avenue having a bearing of North 89° 32' 04" East and shown on Exhibit A. Said strip of land beginning at the centerline of Gothard Avenue and ending at the centerline line of Beach Boulevard and including the following areas listed below and further described and shown on Exhibit A: 1. Corner cut-off at northeast corner of Gothard Avenue and Edinger Avenue. 2. Bus Turn-out Areas at: • Approximate Station 121+35, Southside • Approximate Station 126+97,Northside • Approximate Station 130+40, Southside • Approximate Station 134+10,Northside • Approximate Station 137+85, Southside • Approximate Station 146+56, Southside 3. Right Turn Lane Areas as follows: • Northside and easterly of the Easterly Huntington Beach Center entrance. • Southside and westerly of Beach Boulevard. c:wpkledinger.pin t �,T lost% vrd. No.3233 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, CONNIE BROCWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach i.s seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 21st day of -March 19 94 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular adjourned meeting therof held on the 6th day of April 19 94 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmembers: Bauer. Robitoi11e,. moil -on- t- rson, Winrhe11 ,T,Ptl»iga, Sullivan NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Silva (out of room) 'City Clerk and ex-offici Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California SUBJECT SITE Q CF-E }4C. CF-E ""�' CENTER 6 g IEY.T2 � NCMTBC■FJtY Y.':+!i�A iRLATE:! SIt3.=:CG! .�► F SOYN�17 � s I' T Lamm F A.7�`NiT• ,E W TRIi Lr7RF71 EDINGER F J Qm W R � m P1 jr su[s■�La oa aT"N EVE i■ To rood m ■WlmOR CF-C rR I CAN ILNiNT CN ■ ME 5 sTe k3wr CA 3 C F—E o _ 1 •NITA ISUNV1Er aCNDOLI 7 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 92-02 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION T CIW FECTSD ARF XISTING-TIAETKIN I-GI D ........... I IF T E R F�A�t7jn T lIF EXCEPTION FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS D E It -1'4 SECTION A-A EM, N E IV rI1 ED ij:0. Y V-40" 1 J\\4 E LIA111 A_. Z4, 0 JA I A !L-• . 1. !M! � • Amu z- W:La #A v zq r.1 if 4-14 ®r L A, Ok' IAIP go Ril": I I �D v.0 f 1--40, -k.n'—C 4, - yCY'I .A. A 1 4 (D AE F- PROPOSED CHANNELIZATION PLAN B17 REVISIONS REFERENCES PRECISE PLAN BIT EXHI EDINGER AVENUE GOTHAI1.0 STREET TO PEACH BOULEVARD CITY OF HUNTING ON BEACH IN I-A.I.I.. 41 194t[ tl'. r— r s II. ���; ••I:. x> I�i 4 ``f,� �jl-�, 1!� •i..�i. a .....,.u....a.._ +ate~ `.. , -�{''�_ 1 .Y� •+. I�� � �, 1 �L, �����\b1\ ` �" •• - "� � N•EXCEPTION FOR E%ISTIUG DEVELOPA:'_:°TS ���• � ,� , - - aEc°nri� _- �-� 1`�; SECTION A-A .:. ..�,.••-•_= 1a• � urrEc,Yo on•"I- / t .I� ► �' /` .E � loan=.�i.-r: - � '• y :. Eau, •na•a •cEa.\p.' 7P-"rM DRIV• AY TO- EMAIN No -''-"• "pVNDI DRIVE�n(AY TO HE MODIFI.E,En. ,EcPOSED'DRIV...:..... ;Ir ? 1'—ao' c'- 1,41 I •:i mJt4.. 1 ./. u« —+. — AI —► x_rere epAewa•ura,«• _ .fir=°>•.-a+. O O [ F. :1 L• vE l lI I "' ° r[oras x+u rwroab..N -------__--- — — _ ---— --- --—�— — cl �,T�f- 4aE° do IAVENUE-- I W LLi Lu `� '' ' 'I I I `.. ,1, ,s�-L�= - _— - g1-+'1 i 1 L I 1 T•-,-r",-1-:•� ,� _ i_ 'L' JI-1 1 PrTj j,> •I U _ i i 1 i 1 I 1(_^ T '�' •�'9 _ �� � �'t •. i Ii' I 'II � i�� J - -aa� -! 1- °e, nnr '-'�'� 1 r . T-- -7 � c L_ I C r`> row r .�� •fir r,� .4: �. i� « ' ,~ � ;�__ ' -•_�_= =-I--• ___I-- __ -_ ^%� -;',� ___ ` :� - .�` - P � iIo'I� • ��-� --� - -.,Sr_- --'I--- „� "a -�'Y,�'.<.l..r�%�•. •T" F.�pKIN �"� � u__aa_ ti I I 1 -r •-) 1 'II,I ._ =-1,1-- FF s ONITI . /Z 14 EXUT RKINO $} C -� ..�' I •�;T� ___-_ ^�1/ /� AFTER I-IIIIECT W O BPACE°• 414— t ~_ 0 'DIFFERENCE W ^;I' �� �(:" rr•a-.,, a< _-1 �� � s,awnWe--n;:.«. 1' (�� /� *- _ ��*• \ v��,tD• i 1 1�� 1 I L�� -� J .,,. ..,o..~..-- j� 'i�A -A� � � �� � �f r i Y".. li.E. L�I�:q\'!.I � o•smc ocva. �:I. unur,c 10. A[1.u.urr1 LUE«s � .. � •., m — "...' r,v _--_7 - -- -r_ �__T L. ems•-,— - - �__. -- —- - —_— - - --_a �r. — i -40r t_ r - - -- - — -- - — — — — �,i_T- ...a•w _ ..o _ �E.,•)vw r4,1 f4 _ .� --! 1 .,a f.-i .�_i— 1�-. � .. � - '- _. , PROPOSF7 CHANNELIZATION PLAN r REVISIONS .il-)' ~••-=• REFERENCES -- PRECISE PLAN Ex"'B'T _ ..„ EDINGER AVENUE A 00T1:f.R0 STNI'ET TO BEACH LFVA — —I— - — - — --- -- _�� '� __ ....,,• ---------- ---- - HU NTINGTO IIn B U RD •ra CITY OF N BEACH • f t 1 ■° «ErE � � IT � �jf Jr� � Le � a `� � �' � � � II III y'.�l �I Er_•Lf:.a► r: 1f" I �� ,�1 �?'/ f.E .I• •\� �� t � �I i�.�., •:.,. �i� �z•-J�I�(k OJe Sze♦�C •" . - s • `` 1 EXCEPTION FO-E%,STING DEVELOPt.1ENTS M '4 cur a,A d w s EwaOo^T• raa T! ` . M`1!.' ti.•- - t.� i• eP. E.•o.a. ,r =. t e� { I Il SECTION A-A 10—LE 51 a 11"-401 1. j 1 i. .a°vO�EV -IP a,._� OW — , —l.C(C I • ({. .. I 'ty. v �-� I i II-1 --I , �� 1J., l , _ � •��� .,•E- LI�,_� ;-,� It I ~� oorx,«° ,pro- c.,aloE ...E t-• _ } er � N(iE ATV- ` '1 T..i•�y� •.'1.� .�1 �'!� ; �. � E. ;{ •�� �i' (T�r _ vJe•: +�. E.ta J�� \\ Q�1�T11- / I,�, ,.�, —__-�_�_ A joy _ I ` , , „a a �„ ;., o ,.�,: -•,. i r r T" � • 1' ,1', ��" .;::.�°�E;;E. ,� • r.,-e.,_ , 1' 't r.::..` ''�':*c' `�` ti' � i. I I •'� 11��1Mrr••���1� i �' .Ir�r� i�',=�-'- ,-r_-- — - I r•.� II; r•z-•••-a• •M NTAIN f XISTING ARKING / I •a OE ShDI Y PER R I.Oq( DU ,ING FUTURE EVEL P T %fir I •....... 'I ' .I !� _ _ �11 �/•�. r - / I I�� 7�I w Ruer E C TION LEG , /lI - , o°oo.E. rwan x -�• I� ' 'I i 'I .,• ------- ..r 4 ..,o E° i'T twrrfcr:o,afwsaoxav'.n '•—•±�� 1 . E-E%ISTIr DRIVEv E IfIAT a fum«°rwa«r«°vwcEe •� I- __ _ r R EXISTI(JG DRIVEL MA ' Z-- i + e. b. D •ITE•raOJfCr I,[[r,O er,Cf• II -1{ ' -E%ISTING E AV M IF _ —+ ••� 0l ill �,l _ _ _-"-_ - _i P-N Pf20P ED IVQ Y �p a onruexce IeEE uroan "� ,T I I IH r.n, m .0 r x, ' L °. Est .'I �'i t - I i I II IH c(: I ._ �E 1. cte . r .. eE°Tro,"' I — - —_ «E TO 1 Clr- —T _ Imo•-- - •-- (� Y ,_I ..;'. rT �� ��� fTrJ�- •n.n nn T—f—__ � vi- +,`{.:.�_ .1-t--_ ...?r \ t et'. 11t_ 'I o,r PROPOSED CHANNELIZATION PLAN ,—_ -- — --— - - --- - — -- ESNIgiTPRECISE PLANREFERENCESREVISIONS In I - EDINGER AVENUE '•'� � A TH R TRE T T u ACM BO LEVARU CITY OFHUNTINGTONBEACH ATTACHMENT NO. 3 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2 (R) 1. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan because it contributes to the efficient circulation system that minimizes adverse aesthetic and environmental impacts. 2. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan because it helps to stimulate economic activity in the area and improves circulation patterns and traffic flow. 3. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard will improve traffic flow and circulation patterns by eliminating conflicts between buses and through traffic, between turning cars and through traffic and by improving signalization. 4. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard will improve the aesthetics of the area by providing cohesive landscape improvements. DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAPS 15 and 26 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R) ALIGNING EDINGER AVENUE BETWEEN GOTHARD STREET AND APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning And Zoning Law, the California Government Code Sections 65493 et . seq. , the Huntington Beach Planning Commission, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2(R) to align Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard; and On 1994 , after notice duly given, a public hearing was held before the City Council to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R) ; and The City Council finds that Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2(R) is reasonable and necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly development of the Community; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . That the real property hereinafter described and shown on District Map 15 (Section District Map 14-5-11) and District Map 26 (Section District Map 23-5-11) marked Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is amended to include Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2(R) of the City of Huntington Beach. 1 SECTION 2 . The Directo of Community Development is hereby directed to amend Sectional District Map 14-5-11 and 23-5-11 to reflect Precise Plan of Street Alignment 92-2(R) and file said map with the City Clerk who will maintain it on file for public inspection. SECTION 3 . This oridinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1994 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Administrator Director of Community Development (7478d-12, 13) 2 '�N ING ZONING DM 15 ,-.. [: CTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5-11 ADC-IED J.NE M:960 CITY OF C'7' tE -0 7 7 5 OL-CIL ORD.— ..I,:E. 1, Frt c..f HUNTINGTON BEACH wc it z- (:) RA '-\-GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SC L S A IvE > N ry Z!: OF MESIMMSIER R1 ZRI a .E.D ... . R IOC R I R ElI —WE 0 L 2 —Al )ik I OF w E 5'-5�E C.7, R1 R I R1 'P'.RTT,� ON IRTH HLJNTINGTON E .11E.FIl PLAN .,ENTER SPECIFIC CF-E C 4-M, CENTER A, M , " .1 "i !:::.. . - : • .,.. 0 . -- -11 57 4:' 1 C2 C2 C 2 .......... :C4 C 4 E C2 7 E C 4 C.?-FP2 PLANNING ZO'ti.NG DM 26Z SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 23-5-11 CITY OF HUNTI'NGTO-NT BEACH ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA E r,,NC---R .......... C4i C2 C4 C 2 C 2 4" c Xi R R 3 R 3 RI RI R3 CF-C R 3 m I m I RI 224 1 CF-E R3 RI RI RI RI ; xt R I DA R2 C4 R I k DR DR R2 RI -Ell RI DR R 1 m I R11 r RI C4 R31! R 5 R !&.R3 R15 R3 R3"kR3 MI ml R i .I _', R I m I .:Rl i RI ;;3 R3: CF-E C2 m I L------- j ! I I _j R 2 • R2 R -3! R 3 C F C4 N1 I Ii R3 A x R2 C2 3 S! 7-, R 3 C 4 2 A,E ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 9061,DISTRICT MAPS 15 AND 26 THEREOF TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R)ALIGNING EDINGER AVENUE BETWEEN GOTHARD STREET AND A POINT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD WHEREAS,pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, as found in California Government Code Section 65493 et seq., the Huntington Beach Planning Commission, after notice duly given, held a public hearing on February 15, 1994 to consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard; and On , 1994, after notice duly given, a public hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to consider said Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R); and The City Council finds that the Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R) is reasonable and necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the City, and for the orderly development of the community, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the real property described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein is hereby approved and adopted as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. SECTION 2. That District Map 15 (Sectional District Map 14-5-11) and District Map 26 (Sectional District Map 23-5-11) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, collectively attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated as though fully set forth herein, are hereby amended to include the aforesaid Precise Plan of Streeet Alignment No. 92-2(R), aligning Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and a point located 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. SECTION 3. That the Director of Community Development is hereby directed to amend the aforesaid District Maps to reflect Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92- 2(R) and file said maps with the City Clerk, who will maintain them for public inspection. 1 4\Edinger\03/11/94 SECTION 4. That this ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the_day of , 1994. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk pity Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ;I ir' ctor of Co unfV-Nlvopment City Administrator 2 4\Edinger\03/1 1/94 PLANNING ZONING DIM SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 23-5-11 N?".E ADOP-ID MLq'.- �60 CITY OF C`01.'IL E NO ?54 N, 171 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA It is 7T.- N EDINGER _j I :3 ..... ..... g. M I C 2 C 4 '> 9 C4 C 2 C'4 Z AA IF r7_4_m OF, R3 9 IOLGI DR RI R 3 ST"r. -AlE �'e 9 — 1. R 3 S-C,'NE.000 DR II I I R3 Iz _j RI RI AMLZON DR R3 1450 CF- A F 1 -1 1 .1 IG-T CR zlC -C R 3 4 ✓ CANOLEL r !., 79 be mI m I I­& -Vt IF 11 me 11-t-11 r A�E RI A3 L11 ml R' C F E R3 C4 _j RI RI I RI Rll-. -ANITA LN RI btAZUONA-_D AK —E I..Cl R2 bit C4 RI L4 RI g RI R2 dryR I NEIL A A101 R3 RI C. DANUBE DR RI ml R3 R3 IR31I$R3RMi 3 iR319 R3jj RI = RI RI C4 sE m I SEINE OR RI/II ml RI C4 m I RI DON 'RI RI Z C•L5♦QGI RI R3 RI j!R31.1•.- CF-E 646 C 2 .I IIel ml ml i; R.INE 0 IE� I b f ;ill JR3 M R2 CF-R R3 R 3 ml NC 0 D a c r c• Ce goo T. R 3 m x z C 2 R2 ". M I R 3 • i C4,F w C4 ED _R 3 /t 4 j R2 j mul L WARNER AvE ZONING DM 15 F CTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5-II -- NOTE.. a D:r1,,.Drf ..["•Ll• •r.lOrl.Lyn•.•aG arr,G.•W... CITY OF ADOPTED uN[ 20, ,{O .y[..'i r•t lD l.•I.L rc•.[c[w-1. DI .L.•D._. EITT COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 775 LEGEND H�JNTI�TGTON BEACH .rt.MDCat,CiACIq ....ry,.:,y.,rL i•f-6.^ �n `fG CZ CVrrwn. .y].Kft :=�iT..• !-zc•.� Kf ex ) RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '•If•T' rrG•6 Ktl :�.�.�.�'.I.:.t Y`_:_-,a.f.l.S•L:la.. ro•ro-'t 6.tC A.r]9• .+.VAN n't'w-+ 6-I..: I:.7 Taff •//..l r. •.M[ :twt•r.) f•n-.. r.-e rant �.+-u.IDoc m< not tr ••s.ca:e+ - SOLSn AVE a i J I L I I C y I I I I > S I 1 �q I CRY Or wESTMINSTER .:N'INSIL)N BE AcN RI wNrtNEY OR < cP..•v .L•E - ! a�;% RI Q - -- [ LCOONNu RI GI RI RI 4 RI ILL WE. - IV z .or..tu Art 2/ O yid Mgzl G • WN E U ...7�. '•r Or wE STMINSTCR ivfaa ¢ v CITY - '= \� RI �MINSTES RI °--T-RI c _RI i f �Iy NORTN HUNTINGTON II WWTI["TNGTON C _ CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN 4 CENTER SPECFIC PLAN c ,\,R,I C4-MS CENTER E[i:"fic ::rd•if'" ,r -A C-:Cu-:,. .. C4'MI C2 C2 8 C2 8 i C4 v y e •lW tut It 11 St, C4 N.PfO'ID•t-{)' Z � ! � - - a.)e•ro'w•.-Not• u Vq G EDINGER - — - --- --.7 r,i. Edinger Avenue Precise Plan Road Improvement Boundary Description A strip of land 109 feet(109')wide being fifty-nine feet(59')northerly and fifty feet(50') southerly of a line known as the centerline of Edinger Avenue having a bearing of North 89° 32' 04" East and shown on Exhibit A. Said strip of land beginning at the centerline of Gothard Avenue and ending at the centerline line of Beach Boulevard and including the following areas listed below and further described and shown on Exhibit A: 1. Comer cut-off at northeast corner of Gothard Avenue and Edinger Avenue. 2. Bus Turn-out Areas at: • Approximate Station 121+35, Southside • Approximate Station 126+97,Northside • Approximate Station 130+40, Southside • Approximate Station 134+10,Northside • Approximate Station 137+85, Southside • Approximate Station 146+56, Southside 3. Right Turn Lane Areas as follows: • Northside and easterly of the Easterly Huntington Beach Center entrance. • Southside and westerly of Beach Boulevard. c:wp6\edinger.p1n t F �1,��T 1*3% CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNT I%GTON BE 4CM TO: Laura Phillips �fn Associate Planner ' P 0 7 t99� FROM: p Folaron, Associate Civil Engineer uce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer - Jim Otterson, Traffic Engineer DATE: September 3, 1993 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR EDINGER AVENUE; CC-737 This is to confirm Public Works Design and Traffic Section's recommendations, regarding the subject project versus the General Plan. Edinger Avenue, between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street, as given in the Precise Plan dated July 7, 1993, is in compliance with the current mechanism for classifying a street a primary street. The combined widths of the through lanes plus the left-turn lanes, does not exceed 119.9 feet, therefore, Edinger is considered a primary street. Under the new County system for classifying streets, Edinger Avenue is considered a modified major. Within six months or so a General Plan Amendment will be prepared to reclassify all City streets, including Edinger Avenue, using the new County system. We therefore recommend against making a General Plan Amendment for specifically reclassifying Edinger Avenue individually. TF:ik 3454g/28 •,�,• RRoPE ... . µt,N�uEit Ali 1 Southern Pacific Lines 1200 C nr},grate Crn!rr Dri\'C•Suite 100-Niontm-% Park.California 1-Sa•-ni`;•(=1;)'tih_ru;tit REAL ESTATE h)Re}!% Please Refer tO Huntington Beach - G September 11 , 1992 Mr. Dan M. Brennan Director of Real Estate Services City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 " Re: Available Properties, Huntington Beach, California. Dear Mr. Brennan: Enclosed please find map of Southern Pacific Transportation Company-owned properties in the City of Huntington Beach. Please call with any questions. Very truly yours, Charles E. Gamble, II Sales Manager (213 780-6906) CEG:jn10410 Enclosures w JE,( I fu tdSMELTZER ! - M.P � 519.6 ul h `fY ul x N4,014,361.97 u NEW 5 F4,2813,892.57 �. �� I-i R r,.S.f _,er.23 �- ,u v...,n„ t1- 7— - -,S - .,. ,1-- --•�----`- ---p -- --L,_ -- -•f (1- - -----,�- -11 '�;��\ - - ) --f- r - . . fed - --f-_' -- ----- 'J h100 ocific 1 � t ---— SPTCO. PROPERTY LINES � � Southern P .o -t- GROSS AREA 124,505± SO.FT. OR 2.0562± ACS. h h �'���'�'�� cw"P.•.., CD IWAL FSTA11:. DEPT. - LOG Ati(t6LF;HF-C.10(1 ^' SPTCO. INTERESTS IN PUBLIC STREET 6,400-* SOFT. OR 0.1469-t AC. 11 11 NET AREA:110,105--� SOFT. OR 2.7113-s ACS. �l SMELTZER a w z Ld T.SS-,R.'I i W.,S-Il.f1.R M. r- FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 2032 La Colina Drive Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 744-4526 February 1, 1994 HAND DELIVERED City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. O. Box 190 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2 (R) /Negative Declaration No. 92-8 (R) (Edinger Avenue Between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street, Gothar-d- Corridor) Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am writing to you on behalf of Freeway Industrial Park, the owner of four parcels which are proposed to be effected by the implementation of the precise plan of street alignment number 92- 2 (R) (the "precise plan") . Freeway Industrial Park opposes the approval of the precise plan and negative declaration number 92- 8 (R) (the "negative declaration") . Negative declarations must be prepared when an agency determines, after completing an initial study, that a project "does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. " Such a determination can be made only if " [t]here is no substantial evidence before the agency that such impacts may occur. " (Pub. Resources Code S 21080, subd. (c) , emphasis added; CEQA Guidelines, S 15070, subd. (a) . ) An EIR is required, in contrast, whenever substantial evidence in the record supports even a "fair argument" that significant impacts may occur. Even if other substantial evidence supports the opposite conclusion, the agency nevertheless must prepare an EIR. (No Oil , Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1975) 13 Cal. 3d 681 75. ) In this matter, the city staff in its environmental check list confirms the following significant impacts: • The proposal will result in substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality; 0 The precise plan will result in increases in existing noise levels; 1 I v i City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission February 1, 1994 Page 2 • The project will also expose people to severe noise levels; • The project will also have a substantial impact on existing transportation systems; • It will alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. In addition, the project may: • Result in disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil; • Possibly interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan; • And, at least in the short term, the project will result in increased traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. Staff has made a determination that the project could have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Staff claims that some mitigation measures have been added to the project which would remove the adverse impacts. This determination is flawed. This project has not been modified so as to eliminate all such possible significant impacts or to reduce them to a level of insignificance. The city must take affirmative steps to determine that its approved mitigation measures are in fact implemented subsequent to project approval. Specifically, the city must adopt a "reporting or monitoring program" for any mitigation measures incorporated into this project or imposed as a condition of approval. The program must be defined to insure compliance during project implementation. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21081. 6, subd. (a) . ) There is no such program for insuring compliance during the precise plan' s implementation. Furthermore, the proposed mitigation measures are inadequate and in part contrary to the city' s claimed purpose of the precise plan. One of the city' s espoused objectives is to "help to stimulate economic activity . . . . " (Staff Report 1/19/94 . ) However, the mitigation measures call for all construction work to be done during prime business hours. (7 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Saturday. ) The precise plan is unsupported by substantial evidence in the staff report to indicate its necessity. The executive summary City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission February 1, 1994 Page 3 states that the widening is required to accommodate commercial expansion of approximately 500, 000 square feet. There is no evidence of pending or proposed commercial development in the amount of 500, 000 square feet. Even though the staff report claims that the object of the precise plan is to accommodate expansion, the staff report indicates that " [t]he proposed improvements would not improve the [level of service] noticeably . . . . " The precise plan further calls for the acquisition of more than 2 acres of land. Much of the land to be acquired is currently used for parking. Rather than stimulate the economic environment, the acquisition of the portions sought for the project will result in damage to the economic activity in the area. There is also a study of the loss of current parking spaces. The staff report fails to more than cursorily discuss the adverse impacts to properties subjected to losses in parking and ingress and egress. The precise plan fails to address future parking problems concomitant with the development of an additional 500, 000 square feet of commercial space in the area. In short, the precise plan calls for taking land from current or future parking or access uses for unidentified and speculative future commercial expansion in order to build improvements which will not "noticeably improve the level of service. " .A review of the precise plan and the negative declaration demonstrate that the precise plan will fail to accomplish the avowed purpose of stimulating economic activity in the area. The properties owned by Freeway Industrial Park will be adversely impacted by the precise plan in terms of ingress, egress and parking. Moreover, nothing in the negative declaration eliminates the impacts or reduces them to insignificance. Very truly yours, 'ram-�-ka�S Janette Trotter Ditkowsky Chief Operating Officer Freeway Industrial Park Responses to Comments Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-8.(R) I. INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R). This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration as of November 24, 1993 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Envirortinental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This document contains six sections. In addition to this Introduction. these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments, Responses to Comments, Errata to Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) and Appendix A. The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R). The Continents section contains those written comments received from agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals as of November 24, 1993. The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment. The Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration is provided to show corrections of errors and inconsistencies in the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration. It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration. Based on the information contained in the public record the decision makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project. II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested groups, organizations, and individuals that a Draft Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project. The City also used several methods to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Draft Negative Declaration. The following is a list of actions taken during the preparation, distribution, and review of the Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R). 1. A cover letter and copies of the Draft Negative Declaration were filed xvith the State Clearinghouse on October 26, 1993. The State Clearinghouse assigned Clearinghouse Number 92021049 to the proposed project. A copy of the cover letter and the State Clearin<ohouse distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach, Planning Department. 2000 Main Street. Huntington Beach. California 92648. 2. An official thirty (30) day public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration was established by the State Clearinghouse. It began on October 26, 1993 and ended on November 24, 1993. Public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through November 28, 1993. 3. Notice of the Draft Negative Declaration was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on October 28, 1993. Upon request, copies of the document were distributed to agencies. groups, organizations. and individuals. III. COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of November 24, 1993 are contained in appendix A of this document. All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages. All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity. Responses to Comments for each comment«hick raised an environmental issue are contained in this document. IV. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of thirty (30) days. The public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration established by the City commenced on October 26, 1993 and expired on November 24, 1993. The City of Huntington Beach accepted continent letters through December 1, 1993. Copies of all documents received as of December 1, 1993 are contained in appendix A of this report. Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered. Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue. Several comments to not address the completeness or adequacy of the Draft Negative Declaration, do not raise significant environmental issues, or request additional information. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference. This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration. Response to Comments -2- DND 92-8(R) Responses to Comments Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) DOT-1: Comment: Caltrans concerns are the potential traffic impacts to the following streets and freeways. The project may impact the intersection of Edinger and Beach Blvd., (SR-39) and may impact Edinger On-Ramp to S/B San Diego Freeway (I-405). The Traffic Operations Branch at Caltrans must be involved in the design and plaiming for this widening project. The proposed project will effect a State Facility (SR-39), therefore, an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans will be required. Response: The proposed improvements extend approximately 350' west of the Edinger Ave. - Beach Blvd. intersection and no physical alterations will occur on the State Facility (SR-39). At the time construction drawings are prepared, Caltrans shall be consulted. Response to Comments -3- DND 92-8(R) V. ERRATA TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8(R) The folloxving changes to Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) and the Initial Study Checklist are as noted below. The changes to the Negative Declaration as they relate to issues contained within this errata sheet do not affect the overall conclusions of the environmental document. The changes are identified by the comment reference response. Transportation and Circulation (Item No. 2c, Mitigation) 2. Caltrans shall be consulted during creation of construction drawings to discuss possible effects to the State Facility SR-39 (Beach Boulevard). Response to Comments -4- DND 92-8(R) APPENDIX A STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Governor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH A; =, 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 4 DEC 0 1 93 November 24, 1993 JULIE OSUGI CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGOTN BEACH, CA 92648 Subject: A'EGATATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8, PRECISE PLAN 92-2 SCH 1: 92021049 Dear JULIE OSUGI: The State Clearinghouse has submitted the above named proposed Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period is now closed and the comments from the responding agency(ies) is(are) enclosed. On the enclosed Notice of Completion form you will note that the Clearinghouse has checked the agencies that have commented. Please review the Notice of Completion to ensure that your comment package is complete:. If the comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Remember to refer to the project's eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21104 of the California Public Resources Code required that: "a responsible agency or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency." Commenting agencies are also required by this section to support their comments with specific documentation. These comments are forwarded for your use in preparing your final EIR. Should you need more information or clarification, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency at your earliest convenience. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact Hark Goss at (916) 44S- 0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. S'ncerely, Christine Kinne Deputy Director, Permit Assistance Enclosures cc: Resources Agency rRANq1%11TT..kL FORM Mollie: Stoic 7crih Srct!.Sacramento.CA 9581-91614.1-0613 SCH 0_02�'I P Project Title: • ".PIP) Al; n—enl Q%11P) Lead Agency. C,r,nr r-Ih Con:acl Person: 1a­ Street Address: 11)(In Muir Scree! phone: 014)114.1:11 City H-nilnnr- h Zip: 0't4s CounTy: 0—- Project Location County: ()-i-re CitNez:cst Cornmun,r, wunli­lpt F"P111 Cross StTCCLS:Bttlh 5:1" Ue 'Q`DR'd Z,:,Code:Cll­:F Total Acres:— APN'.:1Vt-r11 1 R�.Cc: 1 1 Best: it%I i 1. i-,.nF .,g Within:Miles H—t: =-A'b I'd 'Water.zi s VA Airports-__.!%_,6 Rail. Schools Qc'.; Cr,11-re Col—e Vj­ Document Type CEQA: ONOP *EPA: ONO) OTHER: Main:Dr—C.1 Oud Cons DEIR(Pio,S:Ii I)— OFA OFina'D--ril EN',g D­ MOLM! MD--.r.E:s MDWI E:R =FONS1 Local Action Type Ock...:Pian Upilinz Osp"if".Plan MA,,zo. CIAJtM.atiett Mvnera)Plan AmendIncrit om"'t,Plan 0P7MM ­ .. _._ORtil—loplincni Du—al Plan Elc,ocnI Opiarined Unit D—lop—I Ouse Pmnh Occa"Penn" Oc­unif.Plan Msit,Plan OL4.9 Di,isim(S.bilwision. K Other IL P.m'Map.T.=Mae.ric.) Development Type OResidential: Units, Acres— Mwaler Facilities: 7)pc: MGD_ 001rice: Sq.fl., Acres— Ew.plcnves_ =-Transportation: '1%pe: OCommetricial: Sqfi._ Acres— Emplercet— Opining: Afinerak 01ndusrial: Sq.fi._ Acres— Eniplqyecs_ opower; MEdurational: OWaste Treatment 711pe: Mccrewtional; OHmardous;Waste: Type: Project Issues Discussed in Document S Flood PisinTiwiling WSch-ILUni—itica It Water Q..1irf IlAtilicWtUnil Land OForrm Lard/Fin Ma,,a,d 1:1%.Pli,S.— M W.",S.Pply4c nd­w R Ail 0wJity- 1111O.M.tic.'s.einni, 0 Sir—C.Pazily OW.Oandllitip.;- MAtch-ological/Min.k.1 Ominciall 2 Soill EnortoftCornpacit.itlOrrading MWildlift ocaruw,Z. 11 Noire 11 wid%%,Me N Gro.-Lh Inducing ODoki.fCJAb.1P1i­ IMPopulation./Housin,Balance 1117.4flia;:a,rdow 11 Land Lt. 0 EminvoiclJobs OP.bfic Ci­im&1F.ciIi6,s KT-111c0,..Won VIC—laii-,EfTm LJ 1 0 V"'.-tt LJuth,, Present Land Ust."Loning!Gencral Plan Existing Land Use Designation and Zoning are Geneml Commercial and C4(Mighusy Commercial).respectively. Project Description Raq.at...W..EJin;.— b­­T%..Ih IiI.Il and r-land S-.1 to I).-to,IN t.—Ii.ion-riw"urno""._64.and ICA—P-1—rk Poti.. P—inally —in-4 in Fch..)IWO Inc I,h6n,—e-1—d it.,I.mi­.06,11-6olt w th,Swomr.and the i­;th of sine thr pr"iow­;r- CLEXXINCHOUSE CONTACTS XAM GOSS CXT BWT CWT MINT -1 State/Consumar Svcs MEMMEMMEM" STATE RrV'EW BECANi OMB& DEPT REV TO AGENCY, AGENCY REV TO SCH I —Conservation —CA Waste Mqt Mid Irish a GL.4 SCH COMPL:XNCE _lk.Q. WOCB 0 VTSC/CTC Yth/A.dit Corrections bs TriarIiop Bos s"­ ------ OMMM".P.-dent Cowan PLL&a&_rQMXhAQ LATE COMMKIrTS DIRECTLY -State Lan lWeo� STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND T._ iATION AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 2501 PULLAkAN STREET SANTA ANA. CA 92705 110• Ir November 3, 1993 Mr. Brian James File: IGR/CEQA V City of Huntington Beach SCH # 92021049 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Dear Mr. James: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment No.92-8(R). The proposed project is the widening of Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street to provide bus turnouts, medians and left turn pockets to accommodate proposed increases in vehicular traffic. Caltrans District 12-will be a responsible agency and we have the following comments for your consideration. Caltrans concerns are with the potential traffic impacts to the following streets and freeways. The project may impact the intersection of Edinger and Beach Blvd. (SR- 39) and may impact Edinger On-Ramp to SIB San Diego Freeway (I-405). The Traffic Operations Branch at Caltrans must be involved in the design and planning for this widening project The proposed project will affect a State Facility (SR-39), therefore, an Encroachment Permit from Caltrans will be required. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this document. If you have questions concerning these comments, please contact Aileen Kennedy on (714) 724-2239. Sincerely, EVERRETT EVANS, Chief Office of Planning and Public Transportation cc: Tom Loftus, OPR Ron Helgeson, HDQTRS Planning T.H. Wang, Traffic Operations Dorothy Uyehara, Transportation Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HtNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 92-8(R) 1. 'Fame of Proponent: C7 of Huntington Beach Public Works Dept. Address: 2000'Aain Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Phone Number. (-14)5=6-54=1 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Re\iew: October 28. 1993 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s): Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 92-2(R) 4. Project Location: Edinger Ave. from Beach Blvd.to Gothard Street. 5. Project Description: Widening of Edinger Ave.between Beach Blvd. and Gothard Street to provide bus turnouts,medians and left turn pockets to accommodate proposed increases in vehicular traffic resulting from future redevelopment in the area. A negative declaration was originally issued for the project in February, 1992. The current project includes slight modifications to the original proposal, however,the project description remains unchanged. Due to the length of time from previous review,the project is being recirculated. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Mavbe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? X Discussion: The project proposes minor grading. No trenching below 12"or excavation is proposed which will result in an unstable earth condition. b. Disruptions,displacements,compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ X _ Discussion: Installation of the proposed street improvements along this section of Edinger xvill result in disruptions, displacements, compaction and over covering of soil. With implementation of mitigation identified below,requiring excess soils to be disposed of at a site designed to accommodate them,no significant adverse impact is anticipated. :..I A�hI'AEVT N0. <�, YU MMvbe ',Q Mitigation: 1. All surplus soil and unused materials(including asphalt)shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to accommodate them. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? Discussion: The project does not propose any changes in the existing topography. d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X Discussion: See l c. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ X Discussion: Grading and soils excavation activities may result in short-term wind and water erosion impacts. However, due to the small scale of grading and soils moving activities, impacts are anticipated to be negligible. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,or changes in siltation;deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Discussion: The project site is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist Priolo Special Hazards Zone or any other known geologic hazard. g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides,ground failure, or similar hazards? Discussion: The subject segment of Edinger is not located in the vicinity of any body of water and does not drain directly into any channel,river, stream,bay or lake. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X Discussion: Short-term: Grading and construction activities will result in short-term increases in dust and construction vehicle emissions. However,these activities will occur for a limited period of time (approximately 6 months)and their impacts can be minimized through implementation of the emissions control mitigation measures identified below. No significant impact is anticipated. Long-term: The street improvements will move the street closer to existing structures. However, once installed,the street improvements will improve circulation in the project vicinity and will reduce the number of cars idling through a light sequence. The improvements are anticipated result in some minor air quality benefits. No significant adverse air quality impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist Page 2 EA 92-8 Qa.• ?vs Mitigation: 1. During street improvement installation the applicant shall: a. Use Io",sulfur fuel(.05%, by Height) for construction equipment. b. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days(first stage smog alerts). c. Discontinue installation activities during second stage smog alerts. d. !Maintain equipment engines in proper tune. b. The creation of objectionable odors", _ _ X Discussion: Installation of additional street xvidth max:generate some objectionable odors during the surfacing phases. Hoxvever, impacts will be short-term (approximately 1-2 days in any single location)and due to the size of area to be surfaced are not anticipated to be severe. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. c. Alteration of air movement,moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of xvater movements,in either marine or fresh waters? _ _ X Discussion: The site is not located in the vicinity of anybody of water nor does it drain directly into anybody of water. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project site is currently paved. The project will not result in any increase in impervious surfaces and will not change runoff amounts. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X Discussion: A portion of subject segment of Edinger Ave. is located within the flood zone. However,the project does not propose any activities or construction of any structures which will expose people to flood hazards or alter the course or flow of flood waters. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discussion: See 3a. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Discussion: See 3a. f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground\.aters? _ _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X Environmental Checklist Page 3 EA 92-8 Y.5 1` ` N� h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ _ X Discussion: Water usage by the proposed project will primarily be limited to watering of graded soils to prevent dust and is anticipated to be negligible. i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ -X— Discussion: See 3c. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Chance in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants(including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique,rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X Discussion(a-d): The street improvement project will not result in removal of any mature trees or unique species. The subject property is not used for the cultivation of any agricultural crop. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species,or numbers of any species of animals(birds, land animals including reptiles,fish and shellfish,benthic organisms or insects)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area,or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Discussion(a-d): The proposed street improvements will occur within street rights of way none of which are located in the vicinity of any animal habitat. Excess soils, if any, are required to be properly disposed of(see I b). No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist Page 4 EA 92-8 Yu Math€ NQ 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X Discussion: Use of a grading and construction equipment during street improvement activities will result in temporary noise increases. Improvement activities will occur during davlight hours. Noise impacts to surrounding properties are anticipated to be short-term (1-2 days maximum)and can be further reduced through implementation of mitigation measures identified below. Mitigation: 1. Equipment used in installing street improvements shall be equipped with double mufflers. 2. Construction activities shall be limited to A-Ionday-Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Federal Holidays. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Discussion: See 6a. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ZC Discussion: The proposed project does not involve installation of any view street lighting(some existing light will be relocated). Furthermore,all improvement activities will be limited to daylight hours. Therefore.no lighting is required. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ _ X b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? _ _ X Discussion(a,b): The installation of the proposed street improvements will not result insubstantial increases in use of any natural or non-renewable resources. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances(including,but not limited to oil,pesticides,chemicals or radiation)in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Discussion: The proposed street widening will incorporate a portion of an area previously occupied by a service station and therefore may encounter some contaminated soils. The service station site is undergoing soils contamination clean-up. Contaminated soils are not anticipated to be an issue as clean-up activities will be completed by time of street improvement installation. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ X _ Environmental Checklist Page 5 - EA 92-8 Yo !` ` Discussion: Installation may result in temporary closures of Edinger which may impede fire emergency access in an area. However, with mitigation identified below,requiring that the applicant notify the police and fire departments prior to any street closure to allow time to identify alternate emergence response routes,no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1. The applicant shall notify the police and fire departments,about the extent and duration of an),construction activities which will impede emergency circulation,a minimum 24-hours prior to the initiation of such activities. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing.or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X 13. Transportation./Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ _ X Discussion: Installation of the street improvements will result in temporary increases in construction vehicle and equipment traffic in the project vicinity. However,the number.of trips in the area will be temporary and are not considered substantial. Furthermore,with implementation of mitigation measures identified below requiring submittal of a construction plan which specifies construction vehicle routes,no significant adverse impact is anticipated. b. Effects on existing parking facilities,or demand for new off-site parking? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed street improvements will require additional dedication which will encroach into existing parking area. However,plans submitted by the Public Works Department indicate that existing parking areas will be reconfigured to replace the lost parking spaces. The reconfigured parking layouts will provide an additional five spaces to what presently exists. c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? X Discussion: Installation of street improvements will result in temporary interruptions to traffic on along the subject segment of Edinger. Traffic detours or other circulation interruptions are not anticipated to occur in any area for more than 3-4 days. With implementation of mitigation measures identified below,requiring implementation of a construction plan,no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1. Prior to installation of street improvements,the applicant shall submit a construction plan for approval by the City's Traffic Division. The plan shall include,at minimum,alternate routes for traffic during street improvements installation,construction vehicle routes and proposed warning signage and markings to provide adequate warning to motor vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians. The plan shall be implemented during street improvements installation. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X Discussion: See 13c. Environmental Checklist Page 6 EA 92-8 Ysa Mavbe NQ e. Alterations to waterborne,rail or air traffic? _ _ ZC f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,bicyclists or pedestrians?- _ X _ Discussion: Short-term: The presence of construction vehicles and equipment during street improvement activities will temporarily increase hazards to motor vehicles,bicyclists and pedestrians along subject segment of Edinger. However with implementation of mitigation measures identified above,requiring adequate signing of hazards,no significant adverse impact is anticipated. Long-term: Once installed,the street improvement will allow for safer circulation of vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians in the area. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in anv of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? _ _ X c. Schools? - - _ _ x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ _ x e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? _ _ Discussion(a-f): The proposed project will not result in a need for any additional fire,police,school or recreational facilities. Improvement will be installed and maintained by the City;however,no additional manpower are equipment will be required to install the project. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy,or require the development of sources of energy? Discussion(a-b): The proposed project will not result in any noticeable increases in demand of fuel or energy. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems,or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural aas? b. Communication systems? _ c. Water? _ _ x d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ _ x e. Storm water drainage? _ _ 2L Environmental Checklist Page 7 EA 92-8 Yes Maybe to Discussion (a-c,e): The project does not require any new utilities. However, other utility lines may be located in the project vicinity. With implementation of mitigation measures identified below, no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: 1. Prior to initiation of street improvements installation,the applicant shall notify utility companies(Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company,General Telephone,etc.)which have lines within the project vicinity the extent of street improvement activities prior to the mitigation of any improvements construction. f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X Discussion: Construction of street improvements may result in the generation of%waste soils and asphalt;however,with implementation of mitigation measures identified under item I requiring adequate disposal of excess materials. no significant adverse impact is anticipated. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard(excluding mental health)? X Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _ _ X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed project will not effect any recreational uses. 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ _ X Discussion (a-d): The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological sites or other cultural resources. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality-of the environment, sub- stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife Environmental Checklist Page 8 EA 92-8 Ym Mavbe Ns population to drop below self sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ _ X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term,to the disadvantage of loner term,environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ _ X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid- erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small,but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ _ X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DETERMINATION- On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a _ NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet:have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENTVIRONMENTAL _ IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature Revised: March, 1990_ For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental Checklist Page 9 EA 92-8 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 DRAFT ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR DENIAL PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2 (R) 1. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard is not consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan because it does not contribute to an efficient circulation system that minimizes adverse aesthetic and environmental impacts. 2. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard is not consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan because it does not help to stimulate economic activity in the area or improve the circulation patterns and traffic flow. 3. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard will negatively impact surrounding property owners . 4. The proposed precise plan of street alignment to Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300' west of Beach Boulevard will not improve the aesthetics of the area or provide cohesive landscape improvements. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a PtK C.NOT(CE .. l resident of the County aforesaid; I am NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING over the age of eighteen years, and not a PRECISE PLAN OF .. STREET ALIGNMENT "`ENVIRONMENTAL STA- ov party to or interested in the below NO.9Z2(R)/ f NEGATIVE - ) TUS: The application i cered by mitigated Nega- entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of DECLARATION;NO. { tive Declaration No:92-8(R) the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a 92.rAv k will also be considered by , (E¢Inger Avenues Council. of General circulation printed between Gothard COASTAL STATUS: Not newspaper b i p Street and applicable and published in the City of Huntington approximately300 proposed copy of the feet west of ro e C request is O file Beach County of Orange State of Beach Boulevard in the -City Clerk's office; r r NOTICE IS HEREBY 2000 Main Street,California GIVEN that the Huntington tington, Beach, California and that attached Notice is a Beach cif Council•will 92648, for inspection:hby e California, Y the public. A copy of the hold a public hearing in the staff report will be available true and complete copy as was printed Council Chamber at the to interested parties at City and published in .the Huntington Beach Huntington Beach Civic Hall, or the Main City v- Center, 2000 Main Street, brary (7111 Talbert Av Huntington Beach, Califor- f enue)after March 16,1994. and Fountain Valley -issues- .--of. .,said. nia,on the date and at the time indicated below to re- ! ALL INTERESTED PER- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: ceive and consider the SONS are invited to attend statements of all persons said hearing and,express p opinions or submit evi- who wish to be heard rela= dence for or against the, tive to the application de- application as outlined scribed below. above. If you challenge the DATEITIME: Monday, City Council's action .in March 21,1994 7:00 PM court, you may be limited APPLICATION NUMBER: to raising only those,issues Precise Plan of Street you or someone else Alignment No. 92.2 (R)/ raised at the public hearing March 10, 1994 9 gative Declaration No. described in this notice, or O in written correspondence APPLICANT:'City of Hun- delivered to the City Clerk tington. Beach, Department at, or prior to, the public of Public Works hearing: .If there are any I declare, under penalty of perjury, that eLOCATION: Edinger Av- further questions please nue between Gothard call Brian James, Assistant Street and approximately Planner at 536-5271. the forecoin(T is true and correct. 300 feet west of. Beach Connie Brockway, b b Boulevard. ,ZONE:C4 (Highway Com- City Cierk, City of Hun- .-,ZONE: (Corn- tington Beach, "2000 munity Commercial) _ Main Street, Hun- REQUEST: Establish a tington Beach, CA Executed on March 10 1994 precise plan of street align- 92648 '(714) 536- ment for Edinger Avenue. 5271. at Costa Mesa, California. The plan..calls for Edinger Published Huntington Avenue to"be widened to Beach-Fountain Valley In- allow,�"for additional turn lanes; ';bus turnouts and im dependent March 10,1994. pe landsca rovements. Q32778 t Xl�, Signa ure ' - OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAW STREET/P. O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 Multifax Image Mate (714) 374-1557 ***PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE*** TO: FAX NO. �v � / — 6-910 � PHONE NO. FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER PAGE) DATE SENT: �I� 9`� TDvIE SENT: /©. �� _ _ PM OPERATOR'S NAME PLEASE NOTIFY OPERATOR IMMEDIATELY IF NOT RECEIVED PROPERLY (714) 536-5227 * * * * * * * COMMENTS: CHARGE FOR THIS MATERIAL: PLEASE REMIT TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE 1038K �n/e.pe,i-? NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R)/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8(R) (Edinger Avenue between Gothard .Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 21, 1994 , 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2 (R)/ Negative Declaration No . 92-8(R) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works LOCATION: Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. ZONE: C4 (Highway Commercial) and C2 (Community Commercial) REQUEST: Establish a precise plan of street alignment for Edinger Avenue. The plan calls for Edinger Avenue to be widened to allow for additional turn lanes, bus turnouts and landscape improvements . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The application is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 16, 1994 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council ' s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Brian James, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (7544d) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxx xxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx-xxxx IcxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxx cxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx—xxxx :xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx—xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . xxxxx-xxxx 1ACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L PROPERTY . TAX DIV-XHAYDEN PO 30x 76 SAN FRANCISCO . C .. 94120 MONTGOMERY . ;FARO DEVELOPMENT - CORP T 1 M04TGOMERY . WARD PLAZA CHICAGO CA 63671 IACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L 233 WILSHIRE BLVD 3ANTA MONICA CA 90401 -HANIE ALFRED P 1419 AMALFI OR 3ACIFIC PLSDS CA 90272 REDEVELOPMENT AtiE+iCY . OF CITY . OF H ?0 8Ox 2740 iUtITINGTON 3H CA 92647 JRAGG HAROLD V 1135 CUOLEOGE RD TUCKER GA 30U 84 COOPER ELISABETH LEWIS 16541 CAROUSEL LN iUNTINGTON 8H CA 92649 xXXkxXxXxXxXXXXXxXxxxY'"yxXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXX X.X XXXXxXXXXXx.xX xxxi xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxX. XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX xX x XxxXxxX : -Y)(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX X XXX XXXX XXXX.X-XXXX X-XXXX . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ' xXxxxxxxxXXxxxx.XXxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzxxxxxX XXXXX-xxxx xxxxx-XXXX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxXXXxXxXXxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xX.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxXX . XXXXX-XXXX xxxxx-xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx-XXXX xxxxx-XXXX MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES . L. CITY . OF -HUNTINGTON BEACH 233 WILSHIRE BLVD 470 CITY _ HALL . SANTA : MONICA CA:- 90401 : HUNTINGTN 8CH : CA . 92648 FREEUAY . INDUSTRIAL: PARK FREEWAY . INDUSTRIAL PARK 27 BURNING TREE CIR ATTN DAVID. M DEVINS 212 HIGH Sr , NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 POTTSTOWN. PA . 19464 . MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L C MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L . 233 WILSHIRE BLVD #70 PO BOX 4015 SANTA IMOUICA CA : 90401 3UENA . PARK CA .90624 MOBIL OIL . CORP CHAMIE ALFRED P . PO 30X 290 1419 AMALFI DR DALLAS . TX 75221 PACIFIC . PLSDS CA 90272 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR CITY OF . REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF . CITY OF . H ' 2000 MAIN ST . PO BOX 2740 HUNTINGTON 3H . CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BH CA 92647 REDEVELOPMEtIT . AGENCY . OF CITY OF H REDEVELOPMENT . AGENCY OF CITY . OF H PO BOX 2740 PO BOX 2740 HUNTINGTON Bfi CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BH CA .. 92647 CAMILLERI DIDIER DE PICCIOTTO LEON 8172 STARR ST 140 N FULLER AVE STAfJTON CA 9U680 LOS ANGELES CA - 90036 ilOL3�lAi� OTTO WOLMAN Ot rO 44.5 .LAGUNA RD 445 LAGUNA RD "PASADE+NA CA 91105 PAS ADENA CA S 35 i SARM Ei4TERPR.i SES MERCURY . SAVINGS LOAN ASSN . 32U 103TH AVE ENE n406 PO . Box . 1010 - BELLEVUE WA 98004 HUNTINGTON . BH CA . 92647 . BURLI NGTON COAT - FACTORY - WA AMERI CAN S 6 L : ASSN 1330 ROUTE 130 N RETAIL ACCOUNTING 400 E #LAIN ST 2N BURLINGTON NJ 08016 STOCKTON C 9.5290 HUNTINGTON BEACH . 41 %SKAGGS : COMPA HUNTINGTON BEACH #1 2716 OCEAN PARK 8LVD 2716 OCEAN PARK • BLVD SANTA MONICA CA . 90405 SANTA . MONICA: CA 90405 EDINGER ASSOCIATES %TACO BELL EDINGER ASSOCIATES 3632 LA COLMENA »AY PO COX 10187 LOS _ ALAMITOS CA 90720 NEWPORT . BEACH CA 92658 FREEWAY ; INDUSTRIAL . PARK - H :. t& : F -PARTNERSHIP 2032 LA COLINA DR 16072 GOTHARD ST .. SANTA . ANA CA 92705 HUNTINGTON . BH CA 92647-3609 . xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx.XXXXXXxxxxxx xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXxxxxxxXXX XXx XXXXXXX.'<XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx XXXxx XXXX.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxXX XXXXXXxxxxxXXXXXXXXxxxxxxxXXXXXXXX XXxxxxxxxXXXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXX xxxxx-XXXX XXxXx-XXXx LINDON LEGIN CO ++i 13101 W WASH:INGTO.- t3LVD #12 i fLOS ANGELES CA . 9UO66 i SARI ENTERPRISES 1 .320 103TH . AVE NE 4406 1BELLEVUE WA 98004 1 ISMAEL SILVA M D INC 7662 EDINGER AVE HUNTI NGTON . BH . CA 92647-3605 - i HUNTINGTON BEACH #1 2716 OCEAN PARK..BLVD SANTA .MONICA , CA . 90405 I FREEWAY : INDUSTRIAL. PARK < TOWNSHIP F 2032 LA COLINA , DR iSANTA ANA CA, 92705 i i I i • I XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX-XXXX NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R)/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8(R) (Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, . California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 21, 1994 , 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2 (R)/ Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public works LOCATION: Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard: ZONE: C4 (Highway Commercial) and C2 (Community Commercial) REOUEST: Establish a precise plan of street alignment for Edinger Avenue. The plan calls for Edinger Avenue to be widened to allow for additional turn lanes, bus turnouts and landscape improvements . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The application is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration No . 92-8(R) will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 16, 1994 . ALL_ INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council ' s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call Brian James, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 i (7544d) Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach - � Office of the City Clerk x _ P.O.Box 190 '•• b i i,`,i i 0 4 Huntington Beach,CA 92648top, set, COOPER ELISABETN LEWIS �K 16541 CAROUSEL LPJ4919 NUPiTI NG70N BN : CA 92649 Tit I NGTpy�F . Cj CD Q i �OUNry ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 11,IIIl l 1,III III fill 11 Id 1„l 11,l,d,l l i,If if I 1,III!I Connie Brockway,City Clerk --- ._:: x ; City of Huntington Beach 1Uj LC <� Office of the City Clerk -TU�� r ` Q �', P.O. Box 190 Sro o, g� •�A R r _ x= Huntington Beach,CA 92648 E FR n ;. ,�, ,;l {► :� = t� /�1 r LINDON LEGIN C IL F A S�G�E S—X- ..� o INGTpy�F - - :l C-2 _ y 1 Q - Fc° LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 liti 1ft '}lilliilill Sflllii 11±3lf i Approved by City Adm. .ration COVER SHEE r rip FOR CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS NJA YES NO ( ) Was City Council or Planning Commission public hearing notice typed on Wang? ( ) ( ) If appeal, are appellant and applicant shown on legal notice? If housing is involved, is "legal challenge paragraph" included? If Coastal Development Permit, are the RESIDENT labels attached and is the Coastal Commission Office on the labels? ( ) / Is Title Company verification letter attached? Were the latest Assessor's Parcel Rolls used? Is the appellant's name and address part of the labels? ( ) Is day of public hearing correct — Monday/Tuesday? ( ) Has the City Administrator's Office authorized the public hearing to be set? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council. Are the appellant/applicant's names and addresses on mailing labels? "ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit to the City Clerk written evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please, call (insert name of Planner) at 536-5227." For Public Hearings at the City Council level please insert the above paragraph of the public hearing notice: CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET — 2ND FLOOR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5227 1350K — 9/93 s iy, City Clerk gton Beach' City Clerk x 190 ch,CA 92648 JMERCURY; SAVINGS $ LGAN PO SOX 1010 SSly. NUt�TINGTON. BN ��C926 CO T - roy�F �410 s�,� Q �'P`\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ► .v ;, CITY OF HUNTINGTON -BEACH o E32000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FAX (714) 374-1573 23 1993 Attention: Date: July ProjecUC.C.#: 737 To: Hal Simmons, Planning Department Regarding:- Edinger Corridor We are sending you: ❑By Fax Ma;Number of pages including this sheet: ❑We are hand delivering: ❑Attached IJ Under a separate corer via the following items: ❑Shop drawings ❑ Prints [a Plans ❑Samples ❑Specifications ❑Copy of letter ❑Change Order Q Other: See below Copies #of Pages Description 10 * 50 Precise plan of street improvement/Edinger Ave. Gothard Street to Beach Blvd. , REvised 5/93 2 sets Mailing labels each for situs address and mail address 1 7 Label register These are transmitted as checked below: ❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review/comment ❑ Other: Remarks: Please use the above to place the Edinger Corridor Project on the Planning Commission Agenda cc: S. Kohler By: Tony olaron �O Print Name AT li IJ=R ;lTUS ADDRESS............. :IT CODE NAME........_.._................. MAIL DDRESS........................... 14-7-J71-5 5 J7741 EDINGER o47-35-16 MACERICH CALIF3RNIA AS;OCIAFES L 233 WILSHIRE 3LVD 97U SANTA MONICA CA 99401 NmE CITY Of HUNTINGTON 3EACH CITY HALL HUNTINGIN dCH C. 92645 14'-771-61 G7777 EDINGE3 92z,47-36JI MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L PROPERTY TAX DIV-ZHAYDEN PO dJX 7611 SAN FRAIJCLSCO C V412J 14, 0 -oS .37361 EDINGER 92641-3532 FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 21 6URNING TREE CIR NEWPORT 3EACH CA 92600 —7 —FREEWAY- INDUSTRIAL-67DEVINS 212 HIGH ST 14'2- EDINGER -3509PARK ATTN DAVID M POTTSTOWN PA 19464 NJNE '434TGO.IIERY WARD DEVELOPMENT CORP T 1 MONTGOMERY WARD PLAZA CHICAGO CA 60671 142-371-97 NONE MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L C 233 WILSHIRE BLVD 070 SANTA MONICA CA 90401 142-Jil-73 NONE 1ACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L PO BOX 4015 3UENA PARK CA 90624 142-071-99 NONE MACERICH CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATES L 233 WILSHIRE BLVD SANTA MONICA CA 90401 I f6c-0,31 1 16001 TEACH 92647-3302 MOBIL OIL CORP PO Box 290 DALLAS TX 75221 142-G81-02 07942 EDINGER 92647-3710 CHAMIE ALFRED P 1419 AMALFI DR PACIFIC PLSDS CA 90272 j.i14.2-3SI-03 37700 EDINGER 92647-3710 CHAMLE ALFRED P 1419 AMALFI Dit PACIFIC PLSDS CA 90212le 142-031-06 07830 EDINGER 92647-5710 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR CITY OF 2000 MAIN ST HUNTINGTON aH CA 92648 142-ONI-Oa *- NONE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CITY OF H PO DOX 2740 HUNTINGTON BN CA 92647 142-U81-10 37661 ALDRICH 92647-3703 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CITY Of H PO Box 2740 HUNTINGTON BH CA 92647 07371 ALDRICH 9.2647-3703 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Of CITY OF H PO BOX 2740 HUNTINGTON ON CA 92647 14Z-081-12 07391 ALDRICH 92647-3703 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Of CITY Of N PO Box 2740 HUNTZNG.TON ON CA 92647' 142-031-16 07900 ALDRICH 92647-3706 BRAGG HAROLD V 2135 COOLEDGE RD TUCKER GA 30084 142-031-17 07945 ALDRICH 92647-3705 CAMILLERI DIDIER 8172 STARR ST STANTON CA 90680 - �P-y 7� LE Do Not Remove 77 eP SITJS NJJKESS......... - ................... ..... iI: C7DE .,wi1iA .iA'AE.................... ...... MAIL ADDRESS........ - 14_-7-1.0-2i 1JJ61 3EAC4 72547-33J2 DE PICCLOTTO LION 140 N FULLER AVE - LOS ANGELES CA 9UO35 142-J31-2i 1a171 EAC4 92i37-3oJ2 C)JIL'F. ELISAjET4 LE-dTS 16541 CARJUSEL LN AUNtINGTJH 3H CA )cu4J , 142-Ji1-27 179j2 EDINGER 92547-3710 WULr1AN OTTO 445 LAGUNA R9 j PASAJENA CA +1105 j • j - - ---- ---- --- ------ ---- — 142-7 S1-27 J7��D2 EliIhuEd d2o47-3710 wJL�1AN 0T70 445 LAGUNA Ril " PASADENA CA 91105 14'-731-_'i J7372 EDINGER 92.47-3710 LINDON LEGIH CO 13101 a WA54[NGTUN BLVD 412 LOS ANGELE3 CA 90066 i , 142-111-13 J7572 EDIN:;T 92i4T-36 5 GARY EUTERPIISES 320 108TH AVE NE 5406 BELLEVUE WA 99D04 142-111-27 07812 EDINGER 92547-3738 :AERCURY SAVINGS 6 LOAN ASSN PO dOX 1010 HUNTINGTON UH CA 92647 142-111-37 77742 EDINGER 92047-3607 SAR4 'ENTERPRISES 320 103TH AVE NE N436 � A BELLEVUE WA 98004 142-111-34 07300 EDINGER 92647-3703 JURLINGTON COAT FACTORY MA 1830 ROUTE 130 N I; BURLINGTON NJ 08016 14Z-111-42 U7330 EDINGER 92647-3703 AMERICAN S e. L. ASSN RETAIL ACCOUNTING 4JO E MAIN ST ZND FLO STOCKTON C 95290 142-112-35 0766Z EDINGER 92647-36U5 ISMAEL SILVA M 0 INC 7662 EDINGER AVE HUNTINGTON SH CA 92647-3605 142-112-07 •• NONE HUNTINGTON BEACH #1 %SKAGGS COiAPA 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD SANTA MONICA CA 90405 j 142-IIZ-09 07532 EDINGER 92647-3566 HU:ITINGTON BEACH 81 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD -: SANTA MONICA CA 90405 1, 14,2-112-10 37562 EDINGER 92547-3566 HUNTINGTON BEACH 01 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD j`- r SANTA MONICA CA 90405 - j-,� 142-511-01 07430 EDINGER 92547-3510 EDINGER ASSOCIATES %TACO BELL 3632 LA COLMENA WAY LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720 -, 14 - 11-02 ] 4 0 EDINGER 92647-3513 EDINGER ASSOCIATES PO BOX 10137 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658 142-511-03 07402 EDINGER 92647-3510 FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK TOWNSHIP FOO 2032 LA COLINA DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 � ! 142-511-04 07362 EDINGER A 92647-3534 FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 2032 LA COLINA DR j-I SANTA ANA CA 92705 ij I`. 142-511-05 16072 GOTHARD 92647-360V H 8 F PARTNERSHIP 16072 GOTHARD ST HUNTINGTON BH CA 92647-3609 •••• TOTAL PROPERTIES SELECTED: 38 " St ij fF1 i—s C- Ia-1 FFFP- PPFPPP ECPf FF lCFP PmprRe ref-Ff �'^ C TI�PPPCf '�E pP pP PP FB PP Pp l°P f Ee "'C PP - PF EF PF Pe Pw Fee EP pF pF, FPPFP F FP FF eF ice FF t, Pp Pee ;p PlPPPP PBC ^P P .* r P m? P.e PTfp EE CF'F` - PF £P. !e, Ep. Pf !p PE pF a fF *�P FP - oP ,• PQoC C' !F PP CP Fp F' FP PP FF ^P F !'P P Fp CPF- - f^ .- . eir .,.R I PP PPFF r:x "P FF P FP nr. mF rC�'f` .. 9800£ Y9 C3X7n1 L'/S26 V] H8 N019NI1KnH LY926 v] HO k0141.11NfiN 08 39031003 SfLZ 0012 XOP Od 0'1Z X00 Od A Cl08VH 99Y88 H JO A113 10 A3N39Y 1N3YdOl3A3038 N 10 A11] 10 A7N39Y 1N3LdOl3A3038 oa - cl199Z6 Y] HP N019N11NOH 19976 V] HF N019NI nnH 9v9Z6 Y7 HH N019NI1VnH 0112 XOB Od o1L2 XOE Od if NlvW 0002 H 10 1113 30 A3N39V 1N3WdO13A3038 H !0 A1I3 i0 A3N39V 11OWdO13A3038 10 1113 80i A3N39V 1N3KdO13A303b 5 I ZIZ06 V] SOSId 7Id13Vd Z1ZC6 Y] SOSId 31113Yd LZZS1 X1 SYIIVO I? �i 80 IIIVWV 6LVL 8C IIIVWV 619L C6' 106 Od I'_I a�^ d 03811Y 31YYH3 d C3811Y 31WVH3 dbc] lIC 1I80W I I__I _ I LC406 V] V3190N V1NYS 9Z906 Y] x8vd vK3n8 109of V3 Y:14c% V1NVS •-! OAlO 381HS11P. f£Z Slot XCP Od VIN QAIP 3e11+51IF ffZ -� 'I S31VI30SSV VTN803Ily3 F31333VW I S31V130SSV VINNO111V3 H31833YH 3 l S31VI30SSY VIN80i11Y; H7I8 ]vW -1 L19v9 V] 09V3IH3 119161 Vd KMOIS110d 090ZE V] 113r3P 1NCdf H W7VId abvn A831091NOW L 1S H9IH ZLZ SNIA30 W OIAVO PIN Y 813 33Y1 SYItW 2 12 `i 1 d803 1N3WdO13A30 08Y11 A83W(!91NOW )IbVd lVIN1SnONI AVIl3383 XSVd IVINISPCNI AVP33bl OZLl6 3 C7SI]KVHI NVS 9119,16 V3 143F_ W%ii NnH L0906 Y] V]IN3V VINVS 91 X09 Od N3CAVHX-A10 XV1 A183d08d IIYH All] 019 OAIE 3PIHSIIF ffz I S31VI30SSV VIN8CA11Y] P31833VW H]Y3P NOISNI1NfH 30 Ail] l S31Y13CSSV VINNCJIIV: 1,31U3VP = xxxx-XXXXX XXXX-XXYVN XXXX-xxxxx �.•"' �i XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%Y%xXxXXYXYxYX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYYYYI(XXYXXYXY - Y%XXXXNXXIXXNXYXXYXXXXXXYYXXXXXXXX XXXYXXXXIYNYXXXYN)XXXX%XXYYYYXXX%X xyxxYxxYxx%xxx%xxXXNYX%XyrYXxXYXxX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)(X)(XxXXXXxXxXYXxx XXxxxXxXXXXxxXXxxXXXXXXx XXXXXXX XxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxyxlxxxxxXxk X%XX-XXXXX YXXX-XXXXX xxxx-XXXXX �.. XYxXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXXXXXXxXXXYYXYY XXXXXXXXYXXXXXXYXXXXXX%X%XXX%XY%XY XXXXXXXXXXYXXXXXX XY Xx Y):)x XY?lx yYyxy XYNXXXXXXXXXXXYXXYXYYYXXYXXXXXXXXY NIXYXYYXXYxXx.xxxxxxxxXXAXXYXYXXXXX_xk_x XXxxxxxXxxxx YX r7 xx Yx. ytY Xy)rXxx XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXxXXXYxyxxxxX X X X YX XX XX X Xx X X III X kxXxXXX XX XXXX X X X YX%Xx I X I X IN y%xx IN x x k X xx XY kt XX xx Y%t i" %YYx-XXXXX XXXX-yxxxx XX%Y-XXXX% Y x X X X X x x X x x x x X X X x x X X x IN xx x X NY x%XXx III X x x x Y X X x x X X X XY X x I Yy x X x x X XX X Y V x Y Yx X X X x Y x x x x x x x x x X x%y x X Y xI)f y.),k X X i YX X YXXXXXxXXYXxXYXXYYXYYYXXXX X::X'1 XxX III%Xx%%XXY%xXXrxxXtxkk XYYX yXxYkYY YYXx%XkXX%%Yt XX xkkx%X y:t YYry YY x`yrX XXX%NvINYINNYXXxyINININXXXXININIII NYxxxx%XxININIxIFxxxIIIIINxIIxXYIIy IIXYYIVYXNYNYIVINI1)01X}tX'l.y(x:(1YY. XXXX—%YYXX xYkx—XYXXX XYXX—Y.XxxX Y YYXXYYXXXXXXxxXXxYXXYxYXYf Xx Y'(xXY XXxkYxyYXxXk Y.Yxx%yYYY?kxXYYYXxXYYX XXX%XxkxXXXXIXXXYyk YX tip X`.v)I*;'(Y f!)' YYYXYYYXXYXXXXxYX%XXxXXYYYYXk Y'(X)f% %xxXYxyXYYYy%YYYYyXXXyX YXXxYvxYyX YI%%xyx y%x YY X Xx xX xx It X Y y vx x ti Xx Y:(Y;;} Xxx)- xx xxxXXXXxYx YxxYyY.Yx31 xxY xXX X xxYYYY xxxXyxxx YYxXXXx yx x-i Xx XY Xx} xxxXXYY 0.(%'(YYt Y y k\YX xx\�r�yk Y('('Ir X Xy X—XYXXX XXXX—XXXX% XYXx—Yxxxx XXXXXYYINIIIVIYINIIIIYYyxIIIIIYYIY IYYXXXIIYYYYX%XXxXXXX%)fXNIXIYxy)Yy IxxIIxxXXXYyIkxYXIYVT11 YkYyy'•XXIIf I Yx NY I I I I I I NY x Y Y Y Y X Y Y xx YY Y x xY Y v I II y%xXxYYXx%Y%XYYyXXyYXYYYXXxxXXXkYx X x Y XX Y x)x Ty x x Xx y I X)XI Yv.x yy Y xIx;:y L r'i I L.I I 6 1 7 1 4 J N FULLER A j Z 16541 CA:ZtluSEL Ll T A I L 35. ;Ni;EL ES CA 1l'75a HU4 TI%,.FUN lirl CA ?1764 1 JOL•4 :,TT --.';UIAN-JT TO- L14004 LE Ci-1-4--CO LAoJ'i4 L, .:4i LAoX4A RD 13171 ;J JP;4 1 rJuT J N SL V D a 12 41105 PAi A:)L.A CA 1;11 J 5 L%)S A!Jb i L_7 a CA 7JJ66 2 1 1 1)c,T K Uj E NE n- 4 4---.. SE 5 MEICd3f SAVINGS L'JA'J A4SN SARA ENTERPRISES va lux ijill 320 1U3TII AVE NE Z4U6 ILLLEVU` lA 43JU4 tiU;TJk-3F'J,4 JH CA 9,'641 dELLEVOL WA IjJ(34 :IJ4LI'4GT-)N ']AT FACtORY WA AIIEPICAII S I L AS�N ISAAEL SILVA M D INC 1 331 PJUTE 1 ii I RETAIL kCCO'J!.TI:J.; .00 E MAIN ST 2N 7652 EDINGER AVE 3'JRLI II.T')*. %J J3JI6 STUC.,CTON C 95290 HUUTlh-:iTOU 3H CA 92041-3605 rl Ut4 T I NGTGA UE ACH Al %SKAGG.3 COMA HU4TI NGTON BEACH Pl HUNTINGTON BEACH .71 Z Fl 5 OC E q'i PA14 bLVD 2116 OCEAN PARK EILVD 2716 OCEAN PARK 3LVD SANTA 43141:4 CA 9[;405 SANTA MONICA CA 90405 SANTA 4041CA CA 90405 P3 IDINSEq ASSOCIATES %TACZ) SELL E'DI'iGER ASSOCIATES FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK TOONSHIP f 3632 LA C,)LiE4A WAY Po aox IU147 ZU32 LA COLINA OR LOS ALAMITOS CA 9U7 20 NEtiPaRT 3EACH CA 9Z658 SANTA ANA CA 92705 112 FRE'EdAl INDUSTRIAL PARK H 1. F PARTNERSHIP LA CJLINA DR I 6J7Z GOTHARD ST H _7 ZS OA-34 ef A A A CA 9 D 5 14UNTIhGTON Bit CA 92647-3609 90L£-179Z6 £OLf-l9926 fOlf-1�SZ6 V) 'H3V39 N019NI1'10H VJ 'H3V30 N019N1 unp V) 'H3v30 N019NI1t1(1H H)IBCIV 0061 ll)JBCIV L691 H37daly 11f1 A OIOBVH 99V8e H 10 A1I3 10 A3N39V 1N3Wd0I3A3038 H 10 AII3 10 A3N39y 1N3WdOl3A3Q3b fOLf-14926 .Ctlf-tt926 _ V3 'H)V3B N019NI1R0H VI •H3V3e N019N nN0H vJ 'H3tl3C N019KI1Y10Hoz -- H3I80Iv L9vl 839N1(13 0991 H 10 11I3 10 13N39V 1N3Wd0I3A3038 H 10 A1T3 10 A31139V 1NBWd0 I3A303b 10 A113 803 A3N39V 1N3WdOl3A3Q3b �I OLL£-149Z6 OLLf-19926 208£-L19Z6 t:l VJ 'N3V39 NO19NI1N0H CJ 0H3V3e N019NuN0H V) 'HJtl3C, t;015%1INflH b3914I03 0061 2139NIQ3 2961 l+)V3e 10C91 d 03NJIV 31WVH3 d 03b1IV 3IWVH3 dbC) I10 IIGOW VJ 'H)y?0 Y:C1^5I1N11H vJ •H3tl3C N619N11Nnp VJ 'HJV,G .101`_` liti1H '1 S31VI30SSV VINb01IIV3 H)Ib3)VW l S31VI3CSSV VIN80111V3 H31833VW J I S31VI30SSV VINbCIIlt) Hllb?3VW 60Sf-199Z6 M f-119.'6 V3 'H3V3d NCISNI1N0H VI 'HJV3e H019N]INO N V3 •NJN3F t:019t:I1S0H 839NIO3 1911 639NIC3 L9f1 1 d80) 1N3Wd013A30 ObVR Ab3►O91NOW 1r8Yd 1VI8150aNI AWA3381 x18Vd IVJb1SCCN! AVP-T3bi l.+ I •� 109E-l9076 SOS£-l�97t - �"I VJ '11JV3e NO1^NIlNOH v) 'HJV3F NO19NIlNn" VJ 'H?v3e' N01SN rlIIN I. ' 839N'03 LLLL 83E1t.103 1)L1 l S31VI30SSV VTNb0111V3 N3I2!31VW H3V3e N01^N11N0H 10 A113 I S31V130SSV VIN803I1V) H)IB=JVW xxxx—xxxxx xxxx—xxxxx xxxx—xxxxx r xxxxxxxxxxxxYXXYYXxxxxxxxxvxxxxxxx xxxxxxIXXYxxrxxxxxyxxxxxxxxyyxx)xY xixxxxIxxIxxx11xxIxxxxX%)Y.XXXXX7Xx xxxxxxxxxINxxxxxxxxxxNYYxxxxxYxxxx xxxxxxxYxxxxxxx)xxxxxxxNYNYxxxxyxx xxyxxxxxxxxNYxxxyYxxxxNNyxxYx)IN Yxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxyxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYxxYxxyxxz — xxxx—xxxxx xxxx—xxxxx YXIX—xxxxx xxxxxx%xxxxxXXXNYYXYXXXxxxyxxXXXXX xxx xx YX xx xxxx Y x NY ry NY xx xx)X Yx YX xY x xxxxx x X xx xxxx xx xx Xx xx kx)y xxxx NY Xkx xxxrxxXXXXN%%xxxxxxXxxryyxYXXYXXXX xxxrxxxxxxxxxXX)XYXXYXXXXxXYXXX)NY IxxxIyXxxxxxxxxxxXxxxXyxyxkxxXAx)x i xxxxxxxxxxxx%xxxxrXXNXYXx%xxxxXXNY xxxxxxxxxxxxNYYXXXXYXXXXXIY%xxxxxx YXXXXXxxxrxxxyxxYxxry%xXxzxYxxxxxx i i -- xxxx—xxxxx— -- xxxx—rxxxx -- _ — —xxxx—xxxxx —— — —— — —~— XVXYxYxxxxxxrxXXVXXXXXYYYYYXXNIXYx xxxxxxXXXXYYXXXXXYYYYYxxxxxYx%:cxxx xVxx%YYxxIxyxNYxxxVX%xYxy\x}YYXx)Y NXXYII XXXXXNXxXXXYXXYxYxy"XXXXY.Xx XYXyXXYXx%YYxyYXY:yYyX)likYYYYr.XYX yy}xxxXXxxYXYXXxxYYkYyyYyyyYxYYX)y xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)xxxXxrxxxxxyYxtx XYXxxXxY)Y%YYxxXY)xxky'tY.YxkYxXXxA ( %Yy Y-YXYyy YXYX-XXYxx XXYx-xyx)x XXYYXYYXYXxXNXXXX XYYXY%YY XyYY NY YYX xXxxXxyy%%XYXYXXXyY}"Y}Y)Y7(Y Y:))YYYX Y.XXXXxXYYyXXXXk AXXXYxyN-'C( y'(X Y)A x XxxxxxYX xY NY XXXY X)yy I yYy Y)k)Y YX Y xX xxxYM))xxYMxxk%xYYX)Y%XYxYX)X XxXXY XYY XMYYkY)kYyYX XyY?)YyX%}"Xxx):(kYY _-___ __-__---- .---_-__--_---- — X- .__.__.__. X YY XYYX%XXXXxYYxXYXXX YX%XYYxYXXYYX %Xxr:X%xxxxxx%X%%)X XXXX xvxx X)YX)t X x kx xx X1 VX YYYXXX NY yx)Y YX XX'(Y Yx YY XXx YxYX-YYXYY YxYY-YYXYX )XXX-}XXXX x YxXXXNXYYYYINYXXXYXXYYYyXYXXXyyXX Yyx v YYYYyvvyyyyvvvvvy}YYYYYYvYyYYY y%y YYYyvvYYYYY)YYYYYyyYXYYXyYyyYY.YyY )yyvy YYYYYy YYyy Y;•"Y YY Yy\'t'fy-1v yY} ri V.I T J'i I--AC 4. C. .1 U,I*N;TOU 4_AC A, CA A J.i T T)N :,c A C ii, CA 4 7-3.7 3 5 204 1-3 92647-30jl 43L 1A.'# ;T T) -----rOLMAHOT TO L104DON Li.GIN CU f U I? E 1)I':;E3 e I J Z E 14 E 7812 EPIN5--A T I li�--.T 14 1-' A C f C 4 d U:J T I T J., E A CA, CA HUVTI%Jltl.14 :JZAC-1, CA 9 2 4 7-3 7 19 42647-3719 92647-371J iA;?M E:iTc.i?WSES 4ERCURY SAYINGS i; LDAIJ ASS14 SARM ENTERPHISES 2 E3 1 4GE4 1142 E01.46ER 4U;4TIXGT.)% )EACH, CA AU.iTI Nol3h 9EAC-4 CA HUNTINGTON 3EACH, CA 92647-36J5 92647-370d 92541-J6j7 3URLI4;;T314 COAT FACTORYWA AMERICA3 S L ASSN ISMAEL SILVA M D INC —',UJ E D 1-4.;E R 78;D EDINGER 766Z ED1.16iR HtlfjF14,;T,)'l -jZACH, CA HU41I'JG1JN OEACH, CA HUNTIN5TGN 3EACH, CA 4 1-3 7 Jb V2647-3708 92647-36J5 -iU4TIi4f-.TOTi !TEACH All %SKAGGS COMPA !M4TINGTON 3EACH Ill HUNTINGTON MACH 91 7532 EDINGER 7562 EDINGER 4U'4Tl:4GT3,4 HACH, CA lIU4TINGTDN 3EAC11, CA HUiJTIVGTOl dEACH, CA 92647-3566 92647-3566 31 3. EDItiGER ASSOCIATES %FACO DELL EDINGER ASSOCIATES FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK TOWNSHIP F 741LI EDI'JGER 7450 EDINGER 7402 EDINGER HV.M.,GTll 3EACH, CA HU14TINGTON 3EACH, CA HUNTINGTON 8EACH, CA 92647-3510 92647-3510 92647-3510 FPEE44Y INDJSTRIAL PARK H & F PARTNERSHIP t362 E014GEP A IbUrZ GOT14ARD HU4TINGTJA -JEACH, CA HU47INGTDN BEACH. CA 92647-3534 92647-3609 ;, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFQRN[A 92648 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FAX/(714) 374-1573 Attention: `-� ' L-�1 ( Date: / �i Projert/C.C.//: To: C—l--r!�-4_��—�" Regarding:. We are sending you: ❑By Fax Mail;Number of pages including this sheet: We are hand delivering: Attached 1;1Under a separate corer via the Mowing items: Shop drawings ❑Prints ❑Plans . ❑Samples ❑Specifications Copy of letter ❑Change Order ❑Other: Copies #of Pages Description These are traaunitted as checked below: ❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval IQ For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution As requested ❑Retumed for corrections ❑Return corrected prints For review/comment ❑Other: Remarks: L __ - [ ?2 jg2 1 l cc: By: Print Name Office of the City Clerk �L City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ING 0 F�ouNTY cam LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ,t Ae. %cam t ; (A 9 Yl z� .. • • CF cppN TY9 cP��� 3 3(/, LUi/S�C.e LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach a Office of the City Clerk • , ~'• ' P.O. BOX 90 5 t ,?, a i1"I,in y 4 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 or,L MACERICH CALIFORNIA : ASSOCIATES L sF° b PROPERTY - TAX D:IY-XHAYDEN PO 90X . 76 �'`�a: � O ✓��R SAN FRANCISCO . C . 94120 ryF G ANT ING 4b� 4 f `° '� `o = Q =N0 POH47E� v �Gr-Z.-~ i9r Fcp"NTY �P`\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk c LL �- City of Huntington Beach . :_ ..�..,,,..,�,,,a�,,,,,�.,� �� /�"r� ' �• «:....- .�-�""..`.�.-�,�"',='. •. , Y4� LC C . Office of the City Clerk N i` fitiR I�'`4 P.O.Box 190 Sro 4 0 MAR rim' Huntington Beach,CA 92648 , en�riGl13��rL LINDON LEGIN C L S ►!�G' L A u o I N GTON 00 !!'• UNTY C0 ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk - - - 1 City of Huntington Beach �^ ` Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 r J Huntington Beach,CA 92648 a O Nt r� COOPER ELISABETH LEWIS v K Ay I�l 16541 CAROUSEL LN HUNTINGTON SH CA 92649 llNTI�JGT�►; I NGTpy 4. i 9yC FFB_' o. �OQ FpOUISO NTY Ca`� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING III IfIIIII III!IIII fill IdIIII=II„III II!d Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ic,`' " - 71 P.O. Box 190 II,`,�q 10 Huntington Beach,CA 92648If 'r •�-';� n _<,, ' 4: ?..�tom.!'�6r l� r J •.3 /� ...�:./ ( , �..'•' �' y Y COOPER ELISABETH LEWIS A 16541 . CAROUSEL LN /� ..�9J9 HUNTINGTON B}I . CA. 92649 .� UUtt 7 �i INGTp�,�F - cpUNTY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING I,,, Connie Brockway,City Clerk - . . City of Huntington Beach �- Office of the City Clerk P.O. BOX 190 i 0 i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 • I �Q�kr• SEr�`�y�r� _ COOPER ELISABETH LEWIS 400 --izK' 16541 CAROUSEL LN4919 { HUNT I NGTON Ohl . CA . 92649 I NGTpy�F ` 9y Gam. FCpUNTY cP`\ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 11:{„„1,1,I1,ItI:,I{11:,„11111,{i„I{{11111,1�1{I:11{I{1F:1 1 Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach i Office of the City Clerk LSIFNVDLe'� ma IP.O.Box 190 0 :? �nRHuntington Beach,CA 92648 I LINDON L GIN C I � i L S- AS4G-MS Z o V �pNTINGTpy — Q C/ FB 17. ppUNTY Ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING { { {{ • i IIFi �;I�It11f1Flilill!liFlli Fi!IIFF� i Connie Brockway,City Clerk ; (yIU. > City of Huntington Beach �F \ Office of the City Clerk ~= s za�' 9` I .:�.4.� .. s r r Flo �4 z .P.O.Box 190 i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 s ." ,k! .'3E !itrA L t s l I C HA fb ,j\f-D P 1 PACIFI �iS;11CO272��`.L , ING .1 0 ORPORAr 2V� `FB IL 1999.P� ppUNTY Ca` 1 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . .. I , I _ Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk - j P.O. Box 190 + ' - t E<..?_ 8 I�Al i o dui I! Huntington Beach,CA 92648 skt , �� , y ,, ,:R ' - •I. 'j CNAmxE ALFRED P _ 1419 AMALFI . DR . PACIFIC . PLSDS !C-A 9027 �pNTINGTpyr � RPORf0 �� 1 EX,?,fe� — = Ins if!icient Ad7� El Aften,pled—,Not 9'y �F�.�_ tOQ= .t�jAs'�L� •� �, 'may u�• �'. 1 cpUNT X CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING i ::i S:i :is::::::ill:,::![....... ......i:,: r � { Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach _ ,>,.� _.._.....,. .�:- ,.�r.-• - r,, '�� �Office of of the City Clerk ,Sr T P.O. Box 190 24 4 r: �'- 1'r I Huntington Beach,CA 92648 " °7s h ``° �` f= tF S 1 - r BRAGG HAROLD V . 2135 - COOLEDGE . RD I TUCKER GA . 30084 INGTpy € ' O _MGOR POR4IF C/� B 11 1909. \(� !' cpUN TY CP` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING II+,,,1 ZhC/E�,/:�Ie i-)d e.r�� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 92-2(R)/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-8(R) (Edinger Avenue between Gothard_ Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 21, 1994, 7: 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 92-2 (R)/ Negative Declaration No . 92-8(R) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works LOCATION: Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and approximately 300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. ZONE: C4 (Highway Commercial) and C2 (Community Commercial) REOUEST: Establish a precise plan of street alignment for Edinger Avenue. The plan calls for Edinger Avenue to be widened to allow for additional turn lahes'; bus turnouts and landscape improvements . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The application is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 92-8(R) will also be considered by Council . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 16, 1994 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council ' s action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk ' at, or prior to, the public hearing . If there are: any further questions please call Brian-James, Assistant Planner- at 536-5271. Connie Brockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 (7544d) ,ay,City Clerk �.�... ....�, ., .. c, igton_Beach' ....� �` J. . __ usrr _'; c,x• �F1a City Clerk 4. %. t h'},i0 -. )x 190 ich,CA 92648 MERCURY; SAYINGS P0 . L30X. 1070 0AN .. SSN. �J HUNTIlVGTON: BH 9Z6 T JCL RyT0 .Foh�F9 SAD;�0 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING yCity Clerk ._::�.�-,.-<:•:-�.�,._.,..,..-..,_�::_,��--c�..,,,� e Connie Brockwa , Y City of Huntington Beach ; )Office of the City C lerk P.O.Box190 ; E':��r.L=�; G'•iAll "x Huntington Beach,CA 92648 __r.._.• ,- MACERICH CALUORNIA: ASSOCIATES L ?b PROPERTY , TAX O[V-%HAYOEN PO 90X 7IN b- � Ile& _ �c�ej � nr �R SAN FRANCISCO : C . 44120 4a m `r. r1 ,`V Ir ���Sso\\ f�FCfi•• /f c��. � ��0 *o u,110i'm Lncn G Q J �N�I N G TpN %ct r =,�c"" S`y il is `NLpR P094)F� �� c. °th, lk19�9'Po `O / �F°OUNTy cP�� LEGAL NOTICE -PUBLIC HEARING ({,4,,,4„4,,,11;,4,((I,,,fill '7Velcame to Fes:ejh �° E ^ I+.(ti Z`15 O -} L_ _ N F -TH GY ON: BEACH. ME . Map on File with City Clerk 1 ' PRE C=S E PLAN ' O F S TREE T 2 MPROVEME NT S F OR E D 2 NG ER AVENUE ' GOTHARD S TREE T TO BEACH BLVD PREPARED FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PREPARED BY: ' NORRIS-REPKE, INC. ' of 4 1 ' APRIL 1992 REVISED: JANUARY 1993 ' REVISED: MAY 1993 I ' EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN ' Gothard Street to Beach Blvd. Prepared For ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council/Redevelopment Agency Grace Winchell, Mayor Linda Moulton-Patterson, Mayor Pro Tem ' Ralph Bauer, Councilman Victor Leipzig, Councilman Dave Sullivan, Councilman ' Earle Robitaille, Councilman Jim Silva, Councilman ' Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator Louis Sandoval , Director of Public Works Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer ' Tony Folaron, Project Engineer Stephen Kohler, Project Manager Jim Otterson, Traffic Engineer ' Prepared By: Norris-Repke, Inc. 18231 Irvine Blvd. , Suite 204 ' Tustin, CA 92680 (714) 730-6410 ' Warren W. Repke, Principal 1 . ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Page No. ' Executive Summary 1-4 I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 II. Lane Requirements and Channelization . . . . . . . . . . 7-9 ' III. Driveway Consolidations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-10 IV. Summary of Proposed Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-21 tV. Landscaping and Visual Enhancements . . . . . . . . . . . 22-24 VI. Right of Way Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 VII . Property Owner's Workshop. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ' VIII. Utility Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 IX. Costs/Funding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 X. Initial Environmental Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ' Exhibits: A. Precise Plan B. Landscape Concepts C. Right of Way Required D. Cost Estimate Breakdown & Unit Prices Appendix: - Alternate Enhanced Huntington Center Entrances ' _ Property Owner Responses OCTA letter - Traffic Engineer Memo EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN GOTHARD STREET TO BEACH BLVD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Goal and Purpose ' The goal of this study is to develop a Precise Plan of street improvements that will improve existing traffic flow, enhance the visual aspects of the area and meet the needs of the area to accommodate future commercial use expansion of approximately 500,000 square feet. The purpose of the Precise Plan is to provide direction and act as a guide for the implementation of the proposed future street improvements that might be initiated by the City or required as a condition of development or redevelopment along the corridor. The driveway and onsite modifications shown represent suggested methods to achieve the ' desired results when future improvements to a property are proposed. tImprovement Elements Based on input from City staff and the recommendations of previous studies, the primary street improvement elements towards which the Precise Plan study is directed are as follows: 1. Channelization and additional turn lane requirements. ' 2 . Provisions for bus stop widening or bus bay turnouts. 3 . Suggestions concerning driveway elimination, consolidation and associated on-site parking lot modifications. ' 4. Landscaping and visual enhancements. Background ' The development of this Precise Plan is an additional step in a sequence of activities regarding the revitalization of the Edinger Corridor/Huntington Center area. Some of these studies ' and activities include: - Edinger Corridor Study, September, 1989 t - Huntington Beach Center Signage and Orientation Workshop, June, 1990 Huntington Center Revitalization Workshop, December, 1990 ' - Precise plan of street improvements for Edinger Avenue, Gothard Street to Beach Blvd. dated April 1992. ' Information obtained from the above studies as well as input from City staff, OCTA and the adjacent property owners was used in the development of the precise plan. 1 ' 1 r-- ' Criteria A list of criteria was established for development of the plan in ' conjunction with City Staff. This criteria is listed in Section I of the report. Lane Requirements and Channelization ' Based on an analysis of the traffic volume data and input from City staff, the following lane requirements are recommended. ' - Provide three through lanes Gothard Street Intersection Provide .dual westbound left turn lanes. Maximum length to the extent feasible (180' long) . ' - Huntington Center Westerly Entrance Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 170' long and dual westbound left turn lane 110' long. ' On north leg widen westerly curb to provide two north- bound lanes (allows east bound dual lefts) and maintain two south bound lanes. ' - Sher Drive Intersection Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 150' long and a ' single westbound left turn lane 150' long. Parkside Lane Intersection ' Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 190' in length, a westbound 380' long right turn lane and a single 150' long westbound left turn lane. Westbound dual left turn lanes are not feasible because the south leg of ' the intersection is not wide enough to receive two southbound lanes. ' On the north leg maintain existing lane configuration. The south leg will be modified by removing the existing triangular island. ' - Beach Blvd. Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 340' long and a 170' eastbound right turn lane (provided with Beach Blvd. Superstreet project) . Edinger Avenue east and west of the entrances to the Huntington Center must be widened in order to accommodate the need for the required dual left turn lanes. Due to the short distances between intersections and the long transitions necessary from the existing curb to the proposed widening at the intersections, it was determined that the most practical approach is to widen 2 ' Edinger Avenue throughout the entire length from just west of Beach Blvd. to Gothard Street. A number of alternatives methods of obtaining the additional ' lanes were reviewed. The recommendation is to widen the street by 11' on the north side. In addition to the general widening on the north a 10' widening is required at three locations where bus ' turnouts are located on the north and an 8' (due to existing 10' parkway) widening at four locations on the south. ' The proposed widening and channelization is shown on Exhibit A. Driveway Consolidation ' An additional element to the study was a review of existing driveways and the associated on-site parking lots to determine the feasibility of driveway consolidation or elimination. The ' purpose of this analysis is to provide the additional benefits associated with minimizing access points along a high volume arterial highway. ' The suggestions shown on the plan result in an elimination of 14 driveways. These are shown on Exhibit A. It is noted that these are suggestions only and should be implemented only when a mutu- ally acceptable situation is developed with the current property and business owner/operator. Summary of Proposed Improvements The recommended improvements consist of the following elements: ' 1 . Street widening to provide additional turn lanes 2 . Widening of the Westerly Entrance to Huntington Center 3 . Bus turnouts 4 . Driveway consolidations 5. Landscaping modifications & enhancements ' The recommended improvements are shown on Exhibits A and B and described in Sections IV and V of the report. The plan recommendations result in no net changes in the number ' of parking spaces in the Huntington Center area. 1 1 ' 3 1 ' Right of Way Requirements Implementation of the proposed improvements will require acquisition of additional street right of way from parcels locat- ed along the corridor. A total of 45,248 SF of right of way from 15 parcels will be required. These locations and the amount of acquisition required at each parcel are shown on Exhibit C. ' Cost/Funding ' A preliminary cost estimate of approximately $3 ,418,000 was developed for the proposed improvements. This consists of $1,438,000 for construction and $1,980,000 for right of way acquisition. See Exhibits D1 & D2. ' Costs include construction of street improvements, landscaping, irrigation, signing, striping, traffic signals, parking lot ' modifications and right of way acquisition. A specific funding plan has not been formulated as of this ' writing. Options for funding could include property owner as- sessment district and/or redevelopment tax increment funds. The cost of the project could be decreased by property owner contri- bution of right of way in trade for widening and bus turnout ' improvements. A funding plan could be formulated by combining several sources of funds. It is recommended that all funding alternatives be considered and that a funding plan be formulated ' so that the Edinger Avenue Street Improvement Plan can be con- structed. ' In order to keep the visual enhancements created by the land- scaping modifications at a high level, uniform maintenance will be required throughout the entire corridor. It is therefore suggested that the formation of a maintenance assessment dis- trict be investigated. The district should include maintenance of the landscaping in the median islands, intersection areas and the landscape strip behind the proposed sidewalk. 1 ' 4 1 1 ' I. INTRODUCTION Precise Plan Limits ' The limits of the Precise Plan study are from Gothard Street on the west to Beach Blvd. on the east as shown on the following vicinity map, Figure 1 and project limits map, Figure 2. Goal and Purpose ' The goal of this study is to develop a Precise Plan of street improvements that will improve existing traffic flow, enhance the visual aspects of the area and meet the needs of the area to ' accommodate future commercial use expansion of approximately 500,000 square feet. The purpose of the Precise Plan is to provide direction and act as a guide for the implementation of the proposed future street improvements that might be initiated ' by the City or required as a condition of development or redevelopment along the corridor. The driveway and onsite modifications shown represent suggested methods to achieve the ' desired results when future improvements to a property are proposed. Improvement Elements Based on input from City staff and the recommendations of previous studies, the primary street improvement elements towards ' which the Precise Plan study is directed are as follows: 1 . Channelization and additional turn lane requirements. ' 2 . Provisions for bus stop widening or bus bay turnouts. 3 . Suggestions concerning driveway elimination, consolidation and associated on-site parking lot modifications. ' 4. Landscaping and visual enhancements. Background The development of this Precise Plan is an additional step in a sequence of activities regarding the revitalization of the Edinger Corridor/Huntington Center area. Some of these studies ' and activities include: - Edinger Corridor Study, September, 1989 - Huntington Beach Center ' Signage and Orientation Workshop, June, 1990 - Huntington- Center Revitalization Workshop, December, 1990 ' - Precise plan of street improvements for Edinger Avenue, Gothard Street to Beach Blvd. dated April 1992 . ' 5 1� 1 1 WESTMINSTER AVENUE S L—N HAZARD AVENUE 1 � O p .da Z T (..._— BOLSA AVENUE z I p 1 ' WESTMINSTER 9r r McFADDEN AVENUE ENTER A L F PROJECT H ... .._.N.... 0 .. EDINCER AVENUE r AVENUE w w FOUNTAIN ' VALLEY WARNER AVENUE z a � . w SLATER AVENUE 1 �V cJ EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN 1 NO SCALE VICINITY MAP' 1 FIGURE 1 00 t3a a Q ti w e. � �'CIIIII ho . m CD HUNTINGTON CENTER U RD < s IIIIIII) �III� � wr �► � r� IIII �o Z---- o e m o 0 o e E.D D� L•+ �J F--i ❑ El 0<11 A V E IIIIIIZI�IZzz k--4 Qorim 4mi .. rn-7 nilrn no nn � mEDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN G7 PROJECT LIMITS NO SCALE FIGURE 2 ' 1 ' Information obtained from the following sources was used in the development of the precise plan. 1 . Meetings with City staff. ' 2 . Letters dated 2-2-91 and 11-11-92 from OCTA. 3 . Edinger Corridor Study. (September, 1989) 4. Huntington Beach City Standards. ' 5. OCTD Design Guidelines for Bus Facilities, dated November, 1987. 6. Beach Blvd. Superstreet Construction Plans. ' 7 . Huntington Beach Center Signage and Orientation Workshop Report dated 6-23-90. 8. Huntington Center Revitalization Workshop Report, December, 1990. ' 9. Property owner meetings of June 20, 1991 and December 2 , 1992. 10. Freeway Industrial Park letter dated February 18, 1993 . ' Criteria Based on the above resource information the following general ' criteria was established for development of the precise plan. 1 . Through lane widths of 11'-10'-14' (from median lane to ' curbside lane) in areas to be widened. Existing of 11'-11'- 12' is satisfactory where widening not required. 2 Turn lane widths of 101 . 3 . No bike trail is required. ' 4. 61 parkways to accommodate sidewalk, fire hydrants, street lights, signs and other street hardware. ' 5. 6' wide planter area for Street landscaping to be located behind right of. way. No street trees within right of way. 6. Use bus bay turnouts per OCTA at bus stops. 7. All new driveways to be curb return type per City Std. 211 . ' 8. Minimize impact to on-site improvements and existing park- ing. ' 9. Widen Huntington Center Entrances only to provide capacity for dual left turn lane into Center. 10. Provide dual left turn lanes for westbound traffic at Go- thard Street for future considerations. 11. Eliminate driveways where feasible and warranted and provide ' revised on-site circulation. ' 6 ' 12 . Provide three through lanes in each direction. 13 . Maintain existing trees in median. ' 14. In general, use City code Article 960 where applicable for specific requirements regarding on-site parking and land- scaping. ' 15. In particular along the north side of Edinger Avenue front- ing the Huntington Center, use City code 9607.7 "Landscape ' Requirement Exception" for existing developments and the portion of diagram "C" of the codes, "Exception for Existing Developments" , included below. ' INSIDE WALL PROPERTY LANDSCAPE AREA6' MiNj LINE _ FACE 32" MIN. HT. ' ,,.-20" MIN. HT. BUMPER SIDEWALK GRADE I PARKING LOT GRADE APPROVED MASONRY WALL ' EXCEPTION FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS ' DIAGRAM C Required Landscape Planter and Berming II. LANE REQUIREMENTS AND CHANNELIZATION ' Project requirements were to provide three through lanes plus appropriate turn lanes as required from an analysis of existing and projected traffic volumes. Traffic count data was compiled from three sources: ' 1 . Counts from the Edinger Corridor Study at the Beach Blvd. and Parkside Lane intersections. 2 . Manual counts for the Sher Lane, West Huntington Center and Gothard Street intersections. 7 12 . Provide three through lanes in each direction. 13. Maintain existing trees in median. 14. In general, use City code Article 960 where applicable for specific requirements regarding on-site parking and land- scaping. 15. In particular along the north side of Edinger Avenue front- ing the Huntington Center, use City code 9607.7 "Landscape Requirement Exception" for existing developments and' the portion of diagram "C" of the codes, "Exception for Existing Developments" , included below. PROPERTY NDSCAPEAREA 6' MI INSIDE WALL LINE _ FACE 32" MIN. HT. /20". MIN. HT. BUMPER SIDEWALK GRADE I PARKING LOT GRADE APPROVED MASONRY WALL b EXCEPTION FOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS DIAGRAM C Required Landscape Planter and Berming II. LANE REQUIREMENTS AND CHANNELIZATION - Project requirements were to provide three through lanes plus appropriate turn lanes as required from an analysis of existing and projected traffic volumes. Traffic count data was compiled from three sources: 1 . Counts from the Edinger Corridor Study at the Beach Blvd. and Parkside Lane intersections. 2. Manual counts for the Sher Lane, West Huntington Center and Gothard Street intersections. 7 3 .. Seven-day machine counts.`of-. east-west left turn and- through ' movements _at the ' Parkside, Lane; Sher Lane 'and West .Hunting- .ton Center- intersections :plus the eastbound left turn and through movements at the .Beach Blvd. intersection. Forecast traffic volumes for the Parkside Lane and Beach Blvd. intersections were. taken .from the Edinger Corridor Study. The ' ratio of existing to future volumes for the PM peak hour;,at these intersections was applied to current count data for the Sher. Lane and West Huntington Center intersections to forecast future volumes at these locations. Seven-day machine counts were taken from November. 30, to December 6; 1990 to identify "peak shopping season" traffic volumes*. ' These counts measured the volume of east-west left turn and through movements at the West' Huntington Center, Sher Lane and Parkside Lane intersections and- the eastbound left turn. and ' through movements at the Beach Blvd. intersection. Based on an analysis of the traffic volume data and input from. City staff, the following turn lane requirements are recommended. ' - Gothard Street Intersection . Provide dual westbound left turn lane. Maximize length to the extent feasible (180' long) . Huntington Center Westerly Entrance Provide dual eastbound. left turn lanes 170' long and ' dual westbound left turn lanes 110' long. Sher Drive Intersection ' Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 150' long and a single westbound left turn lane 150' long. Parkside Lane Intersection Provide dual eastbound left turn lanes 190' in length, . a westbound 380' long- right turn lane and a single 150' long westbound left turn lane. Westbound dual left turn lanes are not feasible because the south leg of the intersection is not wide enough to receive two southbound lanes. ' On the north leg maintain the existing lane configura- . tion. The south leg will be modified by removing the: ' existing triangular island. Beach Blvd. Provide dual eastbound -left turn lanes 340' long and a 170' eastbound right',•turn lane (to be provided with Beach Blvd. Superstreet project) . 1 8 Edinger Avenue east and west- of .the entrances to the Huntington Center.: must be widened in order'. to , accommodate the need'.for the . required dual- left turn lanes. Due to the short distances be- .. tween intersections and the. long:. transitions necessary from the ' existing curb to 'the proposed widening at the intersections, it was determined that the most practical approach. is. to widen Edinger Avenue throughout the, entire .length from just west of ' Beach Blvd. to Gothard Street. A number of alternative methods of obtaining the required additional street width were reviewed. These included widening. on the south side only, widening on the north side only and a combination of both. Due to the number, location and use of existing buildings, as well as existing median locations, cost of ' construction and disruption of existing businesses during construction, it was determined that widening on the north side was the most practical approach. In general the amount of the ' widening would be 11' to allow for the additional 10' wide turn lanes and 1' of additional curbside lane width. In addition to the general widening on the north a 10' widening is required at three locations where bus turnouts are located on the north and an 8' (due to existing 10' parkway) widening at four locations on the south. ' Edinger Avenue west of the Gothard Street intersection will require widening in order to maintain three lanes for westbound traffic through the intersection. (Note that said widening is ' not shown on Exhibit "A" . ) The widening will be a section that -tapers. from 10' to zero in 4001 . This provides a 40:1 taper consistent with normal design standards. Should it be necessary ' to delay widening west of the intersection, the curb lane for , westbound traffic east of Gothard Street could be designated as a right-turn-only lane, thus allowing only two lanes to proceed through the intersection. (Note this condition is shown on ' Exhibit "A" . ) Striping modifications will also be required. III. DRIVEWAY CONSOLIDATION An additional element to the study was.°a review of existing driveways and the associated on-site parking lots to determine the feasibility of driveway consolidation or elimination. The ' benefits of minimizing access points along a high volume arterial highway are: ' 1. Enhanced traffic flow. ; 2. Centralized entrances that focus interest are desired. ' 3. Increased safety. 4. Fewer breaks in landscape areas provides enhanced visual impacts. 9v 1 In order_ to accomplish this goal the following guidelines were used in the development of the plan and are recommended for use in. _the evaluation of future improvements to the adjacent develop- ments- along Edinger- Avenue. It should be noted that these guide- lines and the plan "recommendations are suggestions only and should be implemented. only when a mutually acceptable situation is developed with the current property and business owners/opera- ' r; tors. 1. Maximize the elimination of. driveways where physically feasible and consolidate into major entrances at mid-block locations. 2. Provide modifications to existing on-site parking areas ' where required due to driveway modifications. 3 . Minimize disruption and modifications to existing on-site ' parking, landscaping and business operation facilities. 4. Combine on-site parking areas by use of reciprocal parking ' agreements. 5. Use reciprocal access agreements were consolidated driveways require the elimination of existing driveways to properties. ' r 6. Use reciprocal parking agreements where feasible and within codes when the proposed modifications eliminate available ' parking spaces below allowable numbers. 7. Consider future redevelopment. ' IV. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The following will present a summary of the proposed improve- ments, starting at .the west end and moving easterly, as presented on the Precise Plan Map (Exhibit "A") . ' A. Gothard Street Intersection (Exhibit "A" , Sheet 1 of 3) 1 . New curb return on northeast corner. ' 2. Striping modifications west of intersection (not shown) . ' 3 . Traffic signal modifications. Modifications will include relocation of existing poles and equipment at the northeast corner, new detectors on the east leg for ' westbound traffic, and appurtenant conduit and wiring replacements or extensions. To maintain three lanes through intersection, widening on the north side, west of Gothard, for 400' would be 10 ' required. Widening would- be 10' at northwest corner tapering to 0.1 ..at 400' west' (not shown) . . B. Gothard Street to Southern Pacific- Railroad (Exhibit ' "A" , Sheet 1 of 3) 1. North Side ' - Widen' street by 111 . ' - Provide 161 . wide landscape area (replacing existing landscaping width) behind right of way. Modify parking lot at Levitz Furniture with no net change in the number of parking ' spaces. Obtain adjacent property from Southern Pacif- ic Railroad for additional parking to accom- modate for parking loss due to widening. (Area B, APN 142-071-89, on Exhibit "C") ' - Eliminate east driveway to Levitz Furniture, enlarge and enhance remaining entrance and provide on-site circulation adequate for _ ' truck access to the remaining entrance. Eliminate one driveway on Edinger and one on ' Gothard at the existing Unocal site. Optional Modifications: The Unocal 76 parcel has ' been cleared for redevelopment. The same property owner owns both the Unocal lot and the larger adjacent Levitz lot. It is suggested that when the Unocal: lot redevelops that reciprocal parking and access, agreements be encouraged (conditioned) between the two parcels and that the existing access to the Unocal parcel be modified to elimi- nate the second driveway on Edinger Avenue and that sufficient (at least one) access be provided between the two lots. Also, if the reciprocal agreements are made, consideration should be given ' to shifting the main consolidated driveway on Edinger Avenue, which services the Levitz parking lot, to the west to provide a better combined use ' entrance for the two lots. 2. South Side - 10' of curb widening and 8' of right of way widening to provide a 50' bus bay east of Gothard Street. This bus bay length (previ- ously 100' was recommended) evolved from ' 11 ' input from the property owner. The property owner requested that 'the bus bay be revised so. that" the, driveway and front parking could remain. at the Ortho building. See- Item 3, ' "Center Median" , that immediately• follows for , . further discussion on the evolution of the proposed -improvements in' this area. .. Also see the Freeway Industrial Park letter, Dated February 18, 1993-, in the Appendix. ' - Modify driveway and maintain front parking lot at Ortho building. Consider providing additional signage for the Ortho building as requested by the owner, ' Modify parking area in the rear for combined use and consider providing pedestrian access ' to front with a net gain of 3 parking spaces from 48 to 51 in the affected area of the parcel. 3 . Center Median Enlarge existing median island to 24' wide ' where turn lanes not required. b The property owner requested that an addi- tional west bound left turn pocket into the Rosalynn's Restaurant parking lot be provid- ed. This request was evaluated and the proposed left turn configuration was approved t by the City's Traffic Engineer. It has there- fore been included on the precise plan in an effort to respond to the concerns of the ' affected property and business .owners and meet the City's goal for participation by the property owners in the project by dedicating ' the required right of way. (See the Freeway Industrial Park letter dated February 18, 1993 in the correspondence section of the ' - Appendix at the back of this report. ) . Maintain existing opening west of railroad and provide 100' long left turn lane for ' westbound traffic. - Landscape improvements. Southern Pacific Railroad to Westerly Huntington Center Entrance (Exhibit "A", Sheet 1 of 3) ' 1. North Side 1 . • 12 ' - . Widen street by. 21' and provide 100' bus bay west of the. Westerly Huntingtoni Center En- trance. ' - Provide 6' landscape area behind .right of- way as shown on page-3 of this report and .on section "A-A" on Exhibit "A". ' Eliminate two driveways and modify the park- ing lot at Montgomery Ward Automotive to ' accommodate the proposed Edinger widening and bus bay and to allow widening of the Westerly Huntington Center Entrance. (Net gain of 2 parking spaces. ) ' 2. - South Side ' - No change to existing condition 3. Center Median ' - Enlarge existing median island to 24' wide where turn lanes not required. ' D. Westerly Huntington Center Entrance (Exhibit "A" , Sheet 1 of 3) ' 1 . Widen the entrance on the north leg for 2001± back from Edinger to provide four travel lanes, signage and landscape (the addition of one north bound lane is required for the east bound dual lefts from Edinger Avenue) . The entrance on the south will remain as existing. ' 2. Traffic signal modifications. The existing -poles and equipment at the northeast corner must be relocated. ' At the northwest corner, the existing equipment can be relocated except the mast arm pole for westbound traffic. The mast arm pole must be ' replaced with a Type 29 pole with a 50' long signal mast arm to provide proper signal visibili- ty for the proposed westbound dual-lane left turn ' movement. : At the southeast corner, the existing mast arm pole must be replaced with a Type 29 pole with a 50' long signal mast arm to provide proper signal visibility for the proposed eastbound dual-lane left turn movement. ' 13 The southwest corner traffic signal poles can remain as existing. Detector installations will be required for westbound through lanes, southbound lanes and the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. ' Conduit and wiring replacement or extensions will also be required. 3. Future north leg enhancements. ' Enhancement of this and the other two major Hunt- ington Center entrances by widening and placement of center medians should be considered during future redevelopment at the Center. Landscaping enhancements would contribute greatly to the goals ' put forth in this Precise Plan. • See the Appendix for an example of possible enhancements at this and the two other major Huntington Center en- trances. E. Westerly Huntington Center Entrance to Sher Lane/Cen- tral Huntington Center Entrance (Exhibit "A" , Sheet 1 & ' 2 of 3) 1. North Side ' - Widen street by 111 . Provide 6' landscape area behind right of way. As shown on page 3 of this report and on section "A-A" on Exhibit "A" . ' - Widen street by 21' and provide 100' bus bay west of the Central Huntington Center En- trance at Sher Lane. ' - Modify existing Huntington Center parking lot with net gain of 5 parking spaces. - Remove overhead canopy portion of vacant building west of the Central Huntington Center Entrance to provide a parking access ' isle. Eliminate two driveways. ' 2. South Side - 10' of curb widening and 8' of right of. way ' widening to provide a 100' bus bay east of ' 14 • ' the Westerly Huntington .Center Entrance. Eliminate one driveway. ' - Eliminate existing major entrance driveway at station 132+50 and replace with new driveway at station 134+00: ' - Provide additional access to Sher Lane. ' - Modify existing driveway to First Choice : Realty and Investment to •a curb return type. Modify existing southerly shopping center ' parking lot with no net change in the number . of parking spaces. ' 3. Center Median - Enlarge existing median island to 24' wide where turn lanes not required. No median openings between intersections. ' - Landscape improvements. 4. Additional Considerations or Options - Include First Choice Realty and Investments parking lot into parking lot circulation and ' eliminate driveway onto Edinger Ave. (This option is not shown on Exhibit "A" . ) F. Sher Lane/Central Huntington Center Entrance (Exhibit ' "A", Sheet 2 of 3) 1 . Central Huntington Center Entrance- No widening is provided at this time. 2. Traffic signal modifications. The existing poles t and equipment at the northeast corner must be relocated. At the northwest corner, the existing equipment ' must be relocated. The existing mast arm pole for westbound traffic can be reused, however, the traffic signal mast arm must be replaced with a 45' long unit. This is necessary to provide proper signal visibility for the proposed westbound single-lane left turn movement. ' 15 - . . At the southeast corner, the - existing mast arm pole must be replaced with a Type 29 pole with a 50 long. signal ,mast -arm to provide proper signal visibility for the proposed eastbound dual-lane ' left turn movement. Detector installations will be required for ' westbound through lanes, southbound lanes and the eastbound and .westbound left turn lanes. ' Conduit and wiring replacement or extensions will also be required. 3 . Sher Lane. - No widening is provided at this time. ' Additional width to provide four lanes may be required at some future time depending on future land use. Sufficient width is provided in the Edinger median for an additional west bound left turn lane if required in the future. 4. Future north leg enhancements. Enhancement of this and the other two major Hunt- ington Center entrances by widening and placement of center medians should be considered during t future redevelopment at the Center. Landscaping enhancements would contribute greatly to the goals put forth in this Precise Plan. See the Appendix for an example of possible enhancements at this and the two other major Huntington Center en- trances. G. Sher Lane/Central Huntington Center Entrance to Park- side Lane/Easterly Huntington Center Entrance ' (Exhibit "A", Sheet 2 & 3 ,of 3) 1. North Side ' - Widen street by 11' . - - Provide 61. landscape area behind right of way as shown on page 3 of this report and on Section "A-A" on Exhibit "A" . ' - Modify parking and circulation at Security Pacific Bank with a net loss of 2 parking spaces. ' - Modify remaining portion of the Huntington Center parking lot (excluding the Security Pacific Bank portion) with a net loss of 7 ' parking spaces. ' 16 ' Eliminate the driveway west "of Broadway Tire Center. - Modify ,parking at- the-: Broadway Tire Center r with no net loss of. spaces. . 2. South Side - The" Office Depot, has recently redeveloped their parcel and constructed 10' of curb` ' widening and 8' of right 'of way widening to provide a 100'.. long bus bay east of Sher Lane as was called: for. by this precise plan. Therefore no additional widening is required ' in this reach. Provide 6'` landscape. area in front of the ' Burlington Coat Factory, Luxury Linens, and RTC (previously Mercury Savings) parcels by narrowing the existing full width sidewalk, in the -existing_ 10' wide parkway, to 8' wide ' and using the 21- for landscaping .purposes. This additional 2' when combined with the existing 4' wide landscaping strip will ' provide the 6' wide landscaping strip desired with out any encroachment or modifications to the existing parking parking lots in this area. - Care - ' must be given to protect the existing under- ground Edison line which lies directly- under this 2' wide area in question. See section "B-B" 'on sheet 2 of 3 of Exhibit "A" . ' - Eliminate two existing driveways. ' - Maintain driveway west.-of American Savings but modify it to a curb return type. - Modify the Burlington Coat Factory/Luxury Linens parking lot only with net gain of 3 parking spaces from_ 18 to 21 in the affected area ' 3 . Center Median ' - Enlarge median to 24' where turn lanes not required. Enlarge median to 14' at westbound left turn ' into Sher Lane and maintain single 150' long left turn lane. 17 d ' Provide median opening at major entrance to south side with 14' median and single 160' r long left.'turn lane. H. Parkside Lane/Easterly. Huntington Center. Entrance Intersection (Exhibit- "A", Sheet 3 of 3) ' 1. Easterly Huntington Center Entrance-No- widening is provided at this time. ' 2. Traffic signal. modifications. The existing poles and. equipment at- the northeast corner must be relocated. At the northwest corner, the existing equipment can be relocated except for the mast arm ' pole for westbound traffic. This mast arm pole must be replaced with a Type 26 pole with a 45' long signal mast arm to provide proper signal visibility for the proposed westbound single-lane left turn movement. At the southeast corner, all existing equipment ' must be replaced due to the change in geometrics effected by the elimination of the triangular island. - This will include the installation of a ' Type 29 pole with a 50' long signal mast arm to provide proper. signal visibility for the proposed eastbound dual left turn movement. Detector installations will be required for westbound through lanes, southbound lanes, northbound lanes and the eastbound and westbound ' left turn lanes. Conduit and wiring replacement or extensions will ' also be required. 3 . Parkside Lane - No widening is provided at this time. Additional width to provide four lanes may be required in the future depending on future land use. Sufficient width is available . in the Edinger median for an additional westbound left turn lane ' if required. 4. Future north leg enhancements. ' Enhancement of this and the other two major Hunt- ington Center entrances by widening and placement ' of center medians . should be considered during future redevelopment at the Center. Landscaping . enhancements would contribute greatly to the goals put forth in this Precise Plan. _ See the Appendix ' for an example of possible enhancements at this 18 ' and the two other major Huntington Center en- trances. I. Parkside Lane/Easterly Huntington Center .Entrance to ' Beach Blvd. (Exhibit.. "A" , Sheet 3 of 3) 1.:, North Side , ' - Widen street by 11' from the Easterly Hunt- ington Center Entrance to the Chevron gas station. ' - Between the Easterly Huntington Center En- trance and the Chevron Station provide a 6' wide landscape area behind right of way as ' shown on page 3 of this report and on section "A-A" on Exhibit "A" . ' - Provide bus stop within the east end of the 380' long recessed right turn lane. - Maintain existing driveway west' of Chevron station but modify it to a curb return type entrance. . - Modify Huntington Center parking and circula- tion to allow for the proposed widening and maintain access with no net change in the number of parking spaces. 2. South Side ' - 10' of curb widening and 8' of right of way widening to provide a modified 140± long bus bay east of Parkside Lane. - Provide 6' wide landscape area behind right of way at the first two parcels east of . Parkside Lane only. -_ - Eliminate one driveway. ' - Modify the existing driveway entrance from Edinger to the Goodyear parcel . - Modify the Westerly driveway on the First Interstate parcel and provide reciprocal access to the City Redevelopment Agency owned ' parcel and the First Interstate Bank parcel. Modify the parking area at the Goodyear site resulting in the loss of 3 spaces from 12 to 9 in the affected front portion of the lot. 19 ' These three spaces would be provided for somewhere . "offsitel'. The most likely loca tion would be in the adjacent empty parcel, presently- owned by the City's Redevelopment ' Agency, probably near the back parking spaces behind the Goodyear building. Leave the First Interstate Bank, Arby's, and the Mobil Gas Station parking lots in their existing condition. Encourage making parking ' lot circulation modifications during future redevelopment that utilize the proposed major . access to the west at street station 148+50+. Maintain the main driveway entrances/exits on Edinger for First Interstate Bank, Arby's, and Mobil _Gas, but modify them as needed to curb return type entrances. During future redevelopment investigate the elimination of some of the driveways to increase utilization . of the centralized major access to the west. at street station 148+50±. 3 . " Center Median ' - Widen median to 14' at single westbound left turn at Parkside. Lane. Lengthen the left ' turn pocket from 150' to 160' long. No median openings between intersections. ' - Landscape improvements. J. Beach Blvd. Intersection (Exhibit "A", Sheet 3 of 3) Widening on Beach Blvd. has recently been performed as part of the superstreet project. No widening, modifi- cations to the striping or traffic signal improvements on Beach Blvd. are included in this study. The following table summarizes the results of the suggested ' driveway consolidations and impacts of the parking area modifica- tions shown on the precise plan. These impacts could possibly be reduced by alternative parking layout studies which are beyond . the scope of this plan. The parking numbers shown represent parking spaces only within the areas where modifications are proposed and do not necessarily represent the total parking ' spaces available for any particular parcel . ". ' 20 1 ' EDINGER AVENUE PARKING SPACE/DRIVEWAY CLOSURE SUMMARY Parking Spaces Driveways t (Affected Area Only) (Fronting on Edinger only) Exist. After Diff. Exist. After Diff. 1 Gothard to SPRR North 71 71 0 5 2 -3 South 48 51 + 3 5 5 0 SPRR to Westerly ' Huntington Center Entrance North 33 35 + 2 3 . 1 -2 South 0 0 0 2 2 0 Westerly Huntington ' Center Entrance to Sher Ln. North 77 82 + 5 2 0 -2 South 14 14 0 3 2 -1 Sher Ln. to Park- side Ln. ' North 78 71 - 7 1 0 -1 South 18 21 + 3 4 2 -2 Parkside Ln. to Beach Blvd. North 42 42 0 2 2 0 South 12 9 - 3 7 6 -1 ' ---- ---- ---- --- --- --- Totals: North 301 301 0 13 5 -8 ' South 92 95 + 3 21 16 -5 t 21 ' V. LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL ENHANCEMENTS Another element addressed by the Precise Plan is the landscape theme and visual aspects associated with the recommended street improvements. In order to enhance the visibility of the Edinger Corridor and develop it into a uniformly themed gateway which creates interest in the business area, as recommended in previ- ous studies and workshops, considerable landscape modifications and additions are required. The following considerations and guidelines were used in addressing this element. ' 1 . Establish a 6' wide landscape strip adjacent to the proposed or existing right of way. ' 2 . Use a similar or compatible plant pallet as developed -for the Center Street freeway offramp and entrance as provided by the City. ' 3 . Enhanced median landscaping. The proposed landscape theme treatment for the Edinger Corridor,^ ' which includes Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street, provides an enhanced visibility for the adjacent busi- nesses and a sense of arrival into the City of Huntington Beach. ' The improvements will provide a uniform street theme which could be used as a guide and example for the future redevelopment of the adjacent regional transportation arterials. The following ' describes the recommended landscape and visual enhancement con- cept. A detailed concept plan and plant pallet is shown on Exhibit B. ' A. Edinger Avenue As a unified theme street, Edinger Avenue .is identified by the ' planting of tall vertical trees (Mexican Fan Palms) at 50' o.c. behind the sidewalks to frame the street and an informal low flowering Evergreen shrub hedge below to screen adjacent parking ' lots. Where the same permits, a gentle berm with a maximum 2' height will provide additional screening of automobiles. Along the majority of the Huntington Center frontage the 6' wide land- scaped parkway will slope toward the street with a small retain- ing wall built on the parking lot side of the parkway strip to create a berm affect. (See the "Diagram C" on page 3 of this report. ) The end result is a screened parking lot where the half berm/wall creates the same screening effect as a full berm but in half the required space. ' The concept for the landscape medians includes retaining and supplementing the existing mature trees (Metrosideros) with the addition of low, flowering shrubs and an occasional rhythmic clustering of small, flowering multi-trunk trees (Crape Myrtle) ' to soften and provide a band of color throughout the Corridor. 22 1 ' No turf will be used in the median. B. Huntington Center Entries At each entry node into the Center a strong identifiable vertical grouping of Queen Palms, a backdrop of a flowering evergreen tree (Magnolia) and a simple ground plane of manicured turf with a ' large area of seasonal color establishes the area as. a destina- tion point. ' C. Parking Lots In the improved parking areas adjacent to and north of Edinger Avenue the use of a single evergreen canopy tree species (Carrot ' Wood) is encouraged to produce a uniform appearance and a con- sistent background for the thematic planting through the Corri- dor. Properties on the southern side may opt to match existing ' species. D. Lighting It is recommended that a cohesive lighting scheme be created along Edinger Avenue by replacing the existing street lights with colored concrete or anodized aluminum poles with decorative fixtures. It is also suggested that the private property owners along the Corridor be encouraged to use similar lighting poles and fixtures in the parking lots. This will play an important ' role in improving the visual quality of the area and contribute to the street's identity and image. E. Maintenance ' In order to keep the visual enhancements created by the landscaping modifications at a high level, uniform maintenance ' will be required throughout the entire Corridor. It is therefore recommended that a maintenance assessment district be -formed including the City and all property owners along the Corridor. ' The district should include maintenance of the landscaping in the median islands, intersection areas and the landscape strip behind the proposed sidewalk. However, in order to keep a separation between the landscaping within street right of way and that on ' private property it is required that separate irrigation systems and water supply be provided for the median and the private parkway strip at each side of Edinger Avenue. At only one loca- tion in the project, namely between street stations 140+75± and 144+00± on the south side of Edinger (Burlington Coat Factory, Luxury Linens, and RTC frontage) there is landscaping proposed ' within the roadway right of way. (See Exhibit "A" , Sheet 2 of 3 , plan view and special section "B-B" detail. ) At this location the planting area behind the walk (in the R.O.W. ) will become a part of the privately maintained landscape area with .private t property behind the property line. rN� ' 23 ' It is also recommended that the decorative street light system be converted to a City owned system and included in the maintenance district. ' VI. RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS Implementation of the proposed improvements will require ' acquisition of additional street right of way from parcels locat- ed along the corridor. A total of 45,748 SF of right of way from 15 parcels will be required. The location and amount of acquisi- tion area required at each parcel are shown on Exhibit C. VII. PROPERTY OWNER'S WORKSHOPS t On June 20, 1991 a public workshop was held with the property owners along the corridor to present preliminary precise plan concepts, discuss impacts on the adjacent properties and in ' general receive input from the property owners, managers and business operations. ' As a result of the workshop several letter responses were received and are included in the Appendix. Comments made in the letters and at the workshop were reviewed and revisions made to the precise plan where appropriate. Subsequent property owner meetings and correspondence with the OCTA, which are documented in the Appendix correspondence, also contributed to some of the subtle detail revisions which are reflected on the final precise plan exhibits. VIII. UTILITY/OTHER AGENCY CONSIDERATIONS Construction of the proposed improvement will not cause any major disruption or conflict with existing utilities. Street lights, ' fire hydrants and meters will need to be relocated where street widening is proposed. Widening of the Southern Pacific Railroad crossing east of Gothard is required to accommodate the proposed improvements. This is usually a 2-3 year process and therefore should be initiated as early as possible after adoption of the precise ' plan. The Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) was contacted early and throughout the planning process regarding the bus turnout locations and requirements. They provided preferred locations and lengths of the bus turnouts. These were accommodated during ' the development of the plan. Further review of the turnouts included on the precise plan by OCTA staff resulted in their concurrence (see letter from Orange County Transportation Author- ity in the Appendix) . ' 24 1 1 IX. COSTS/FUNDING ' A preliminary cost estimate was- prepared for implementation of the proposed improvements. Costs were broken down by reach and ' separated for improvements within the proposed right of way and improvements onsite. Costs include construction of street im- provements, landscaping, irrigation, signing, striping, , traffic signals, parking lot modifications and right of way acquisition. The estimated total right of way and construction costs (plus a 15% contingency) by reach are as follows: ' A. Gothard Street to Southern Pacific Railroad. . . . $1,050,180 B. Southern Pacific Railroad to Westerly. . . . . . . . . . 442,750 Huntington Center Entrance ' C. Westerly Huntington Center Entrance. . . . . . . . . . . . 732 ,550 to Sher Lane D. Sher Lane to Parkside Lane. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 645, 380 ' E. Parkside Lane to Beach Blvd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 547 ,630 Total = $3 ,418,490 ' A detailed breakdown of the costs is shown on Exhibits D1 & D2 . A specific funding plan has not been formulated as of this ' writing. Options for funding could include property owner as- sessment district and/or redevelopment tax increment funds. The cost of the project could be decreased by property owner contri- bution of right of way in trade for the widening and bus turnout improvements. A funding plan could be formulated by combining several sources of funds. It is recommended that all funding alternatives be considered and that a funding plan be formulated ' so that the Edinger Avenue Street Improvement Plan can be con- structed. ' X. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY If the project is subject to the requirements of the California ' Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is not exempted under any of the provisions of the CEQA Guidelines, the City must conduct an initial study to determine if the project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment, or whether previous environ- mental analysis has been performed which addresses the impacts of the specific project being proposed. ' The following Environmental Assessment Form was completed to initiate the start of the environmental process. ' A:WS5\8201PREC.PLN 1 ' 25 r ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM GENERAL INFORMATION: ' 1 . Name of Property Owner City of Huntington Beach Address 2000 Main Street City Huntington Beach State CA Zip 92648 Telephone 536-5271 2 . Name of Authorized Agent Public Works Department Address Same City State Zip Telephone ' 3 . List any other related permits or approvals required . from Agencies other than City of Huntington Beach, i . e . Caltrans , Coastal Commission : If approved, Type of permit Agency give date Channel Widening OCE14A Tract Crossing Widening SPRR 4 . Is the proposal part of a larger project or series of projects? NO If so, describe the proposal ' s relationship ' to the project or series of projects : LOCATION OF PROJECT: ' 5 . Address :_ N/A ' 6 . Project site is located on the north, south, east ,. west (circle one) side of Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Blvd. streets . ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 7 . Site size: N/A gross acres/square feet . N/A net acres/square feet . 8 . What is the surrounding land use to the ' North Commercial/Retail South Office Commercial East Office Commercial ' West Commercial ' 26 . What is the distance of the project from the nearest : School N/A Hospital N/A Convalescent Hospital N/A Park or Recreation Facilityl- A 27 . Does the project involve the handling, manufacture, storage, ' transport or disposal of any toxic, flammable or hazardous substance? no If so, please describe and indicate what safety measures have been incorporated into the project : ' . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 28 . If improvements are to be demolished by the project, please outline them on the site plan and describe them briefly: Existing Street Improvements & Landscaping ' 29 . Will the project potentially affect an historic structure or object in any way? no If so, please describe : 30 . List any potential noise sources which could affect the site (i . e . , roadways , freeways , industrial projects) and give approximate distances : N/A 31 . Describe any noise that will be produced by the project during ' construction and after project is completed : Typical construction equipment noise associated with street widening ' 32 . Will the project incorporate outdoor lighting? yes If so, indicate location and source on the site plan. 33 . Estimate the average number of daily vehicle trips (ADT) —generated by the project site currently N A after development N/A 34 . List type and quantity of any air pollutants that the project will emit • No significant changes to existing 35 . Describe the type and source of any odors that may emanate from the project or site:—No significant changes to existing 36 . If the drainage from the project will not be discharged into an ' existing public storm water drainage system, please describe how _. it will be accommodated• In to public .storm drain, same as existing. 37 . Has the project site been previously graded? N/A If so, what ' percent ' (b) Minimize dust during construction of the project? Standard dust control methods (c) Minimize noise during construction of the project? None ' After completion None.required (d) Minimize air pollution emissions? None (e) Protect, enhance or conserve energy, non-renewable ' resources , water, vegetation, wildlife, aesthetic quality, views, etc. Aesthic quality will be enhanced by new landscape treatment. Water efficient irrigation & landsc a will be considered. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this ' initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts , statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or_ be.lief. 01-19-93 Warren W. Re ke Date Prin ame of Pregarer �� , � Signature of Prep r ' City of Huntington Beach Print Name of Property Owner ' or Authorized Agent Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Agent ' (6202d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING_ DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Name of Property Owner City of Huntington Beach Address 2000 Main Street ' City Huntington Beach State CA Zip 92648 Telephone 536-5271 ' 2 . Name of Authorized Agent Public Works Department Address Same City State Zip Telephone 3 . List any other related permits or approvals required . from Agencies other than City of Huntington Beach, i .e . Caltrans , Coastal Commission: If approved, Type of permit Agency give date Channel Widening OCE11A Tract Crossing Widening SPRR 4 . Is the proposal part of a larger project or series of projects? NO If so, describe the proposal ' s relationship to the project or series of projects : ' LOCATION OF PROJECT: ' S . Address : N/A 6 . Project site is located on the north, south, east , west (circle one) side of Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Blvd. streets . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 7 . Site size: N/A gross acres/square feet . ' N/A net acres/square feet . 8 . What is the surrounding land use to the ' North Commercial/Retail South Office Commercial East Office Commercia West Commercial ' FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: (IF PROJECT IS COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR INSTITUTIONAL SKIP TO ITEM 25_. ) ' 9 . Number of lots/dwelling units : 10 . Maximum building height and number of stories : ' t11. Amount and type of off-street parking proposed: - ' 12 . Describe any recreational facilities to be provided: t13 . Describe the proposed scheduling or phasing of the project: ' 14 . What ercenta a of the project site will be covered b : P 9 P 7 Y Paving $; Building %; Landscaping % . FOR COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL OR INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS (IF PROJECT IS RESIDENTIAL SKIP TO ITEM 2$_ ) 15 . Describe the types of uses and/or activities proposed : Street Widening Project 16 . Size of each proposed building : ( in gross square feet) : T - 17 . Number of buildings proposed : N/A ' 18 . Maximum building height and number of stories : N/A 19 . Amount and type of off-street parking proposed : Project causes small reduction in existing parking to be replaced with future structure. 20 . Projected number of employees : ' N/A total per shift 21 . Maximum Occupancy of building(s) : N/A ' 22 . What will be - the days and hours of operation: N/A ' 23 . Describe the proposed scheduling or phasing of the project : To be implemented in phases scheduled around changes in adjacent development 24 . For restaurants, how many seats will there be: N/A If outdoor seating is proposed, amount of outdoor square footage 25 . What er n a e of the project site will be covered b : P $� t g e P ] � Y Paving %; Building %; Landscaping 20 %. 26 . What is the distance of the project from the nearest : School N/A Hospital N/A Convalescent Hospital N/A ' Park or Recreation FacilitVN A 27 . Does the project involve the handling, manufacture, storage, transport or disposal of any toxic, flammable or hazardous substance? no If so, please describe and indicate what safety measures have been incorporated into the project : ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS : 28 . If improvements are to be demolished by the project, please outline them on the site plan and describe them briefly: ' Existing Street Improvements & Landscaping 29 . Will the project potentially affect an historic structure or object in any way? no If so, please describe : 30 . List any potential noise sources which could affect the site '. (i .e. , roadways, freeways , industrial projects) and give N/ approximate distances : A ' 31 . Describe any noise that will be produced b the project during P Y P ro '7 9 construction and after project is completed : Typical construction ' equipment noise associated with street widening ' 32 . Will the project incorporate outdoor lighting? yes If so, indicate location and source on the site plan. 33 . Estimate the average number of daily vehicle trips (ADT) ' generated by the project site currently NIA after development N/A ' 34 . List type and quantity of any air pollutants that the project - will emit: No significant changes to existing ' 35 . Describe the tY e and source of an odors that may emanate from the project or site: No significant changes to existing 36 . If the drainage from the project will not be discharged into an existing public storm water drainage system, please describe how it will be accommodated: In to public storm drain same as existing. ' 37. Has the project site been previously graded? N/A If so, what percent 38. What percentage of the site will be graded as part of this project? N/A % ' 39 . Volume of cutting : 2000 cubic yards; maximum cut slope ratio will be 2tl maximum cut slope height will be t nno feet. t40 . volume of fill : 500 cubic yards; maximum fill slope ratio will be nnne ; maximum fill slope height will be O/N . feet . ' 41 . Does the cut and fill volume balance? no If not, how will import/export be handled? Excess street excavation to be disposed of off then rnierr sire_ ' 42 . Identify species of plants and animals that are found on the site, and describe any areas of vegetation to be removed (to be shown on accompanying site plan) No permanent animals. Existing median 3AnA-.'nv4ma x parking landscaping on north to be removed and replaced. 43 . What is the distance to the nearest beach, channel waterway, wetland, degraded wetland, or inland water area? N/A Describe how the project mayl affect any body of water . Nn change in affect 44 . What is the Flood Insurance Rate Map designation on the site? If the site is in a floodplain, describe the method of floodproofing, and impacts of such floodproofing on adjacent property. (A hydrology study may be required) N/A 45 . Will the project require installation or replacement of water lines? Trrigation Approximately how may gallons of water per day will the project use? _5,000 gallons 46 . Will the project require installation or replacement of sewer lines? no Approximately how many gallons of sewage per day will be discharged into the sewer system? N/A gallons 47 . Describe the type and amount (pounds per day) of solid waste generated by the project : N/A 47. Will any residential occupants be displaced by the project? No MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION MEASURES:49 . What measures have been incorporated into the project, beyond what is required by existing codes and standards to: (a) Minimize erosion and siltation during construction of the project? Standard methods only. After completion? none needed (b) Minimize dust during construction of the project? ' Standard dust control methods (c) Minimize noise during construction of the project? None After completion None required (d) Minimize air pollution emissions? None 1 (e) Protect, enhance or conserve energy, non-renewable resources, water, vegetation, wildlife, aesthetic quality, ' views, etc. Aesthic quality will be enhanced by new landscape treatment. Water efficient irrigation & landsc a will be considered. 1 CERTIFICATION ' I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, ' statements , and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or belief. 01-19-93 Warren W. Re k Date Prin ame of Pregarer Signature of Prep64r ' City of Huntington Beach Print Name of Property Owner ' or Authorized Agent Signature of Property Owner ' or Authorized Agent (6202d) 1 � EXHIBITS . . 1 1 1 NOAAISAEPKE, INC. T -. ,Y•' .'�"ik "":1,f ie-s.: i s ar� ,�,t, SA CITY' 0-F H iiITIN;GTOI\(s BEACH m 45't ' GOTHARD STREET 14z-o152 F/Nef' S.P.R.R. WESTERLY p- n5z af. o HUNTINGTON CENTER 142-071—ss 14z—o77—ss Q -10663 e.f. I m (30 ENTRANCE TOTAL 11815 &f. 14 I a I �n I 142-071-9/ I 1 oI m (��j t r' 5799 a f. 4 42-071— ' I aI n at 270 sf. I I 1453 a.f. 2803 S.F. �^ C------------- -------- W Bo 612 -- -T7:-K- F- - - - 153 n.f. a t 11 1 1275 142-511-04 142-517-03 �- ,4Z-811—GQ 142-511-01 &f. I 142-112-09 I 142-712—70 CENTRAL 142-112-M ' HUNTINGTON CENTER SHOPPING CENTER ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ' 142-071-98 142-071-99 II I II L_ 9324 af. I 142-071-53 I 5357 s.f. ib 7 2 , - - _--- -�- _ ��=- -r 142-112-10 ! 142-112-05 II 142-111-18 ; 142-111-32 142-111-34 142-111-27 EASTERLY ' HUNTINGTON CENTER SHER LANE ENTRANCE BEACH BLVD. 142-071-97 I 142-071-61 LEGEND 142-071-53 I I I 4265 af. I' I I o ' � I � 1� I = _ _ _ = EXISTING CURB k GUTTER EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY _ I' ---- EX1� — 5,iNG PARCEL UNE� I ------------------------ I PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 142-071-66 ASSESSORS PARCEL (AP) No. ' ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRED j 1400 s.f. APPROXIMATE EACH DEL AREA REQUIRED FROM I I ' 142-111-42 I ( 568 af. i i _ I ✓� - 839 sf. 328 s f. 142-081-28 142-081-06 142-081-27 142-081-03�142-081-02 142—OBt-01 I --�.�� .,. NO SCALE PARKSIDE LANE I I MAY 1993 ' NORRIS—REPKE.INC. PRECISE PLAN EXHIBIT EDINGER AVENUE L o....uy oa ogw..,.aw tr......r... A 10231 IRVINE BLVD. SURE 204 ' 1 TUSTIN. CIWFORNIA. 92680 REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY, c (714) 730-6410 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 8201\ED2.DWG J.N. 82-01 Tom_ 1 EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN ' COST ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE JANUARY 1993 MAY 1993 PAVEMENT REMOVAL 0.50/SF ' SIDEWALK REMOVAL 0.20/SF ' CURB & GUTTER REMOVAL 3.00/LF 3" AC/6" AB 1.20/SF ' 4" AC/8" AB 1.60/SF P.C.C. SIDEWALK 3.50/SF ' CURB & GUTTER 12.50/LF P.C.C. BUSBAY 9.00/SF ' P.C.C. DRIVEWAY 5.00/SF STREET LIGHT 2000.00/EA ' STRIPING 3.00/LF ' RIGHT OF WAY 37.00/SF LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION. ' IRRIGATION 1.25/SF GROUND COVER 0.26/SF ' TREES/PALMS/5 GAL. SHRUBS 3.25/SF ' SOIL PREPARATION 0_18/SF LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TOTAL 4.94/SF 1 EXHIBIT Dl ' PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY MAY 2B, 1943 EDINGER. AVENUE - FROM GOTHARD ST. TO BEACH BLVD. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 STREET : LANDSCAPING 1 STRIPING TRAFFIC 1 PARKING LOT ;RIGHT OF NAY ; SUBTOTAL : SUBTOTAL + EDINGER AVENUE -:IMPROVEMENTS :f IRRIGATION 1 1 SIGNAL !IMPROVEMENTS 1 ACOUISITION ; 15Y CONT. 1 : ------------ ------------- ------------ :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS ; 1_ .. !NORTH OF EDINGER 124,300 ! 1544,604 ; f673�7,00;, a__i114,755 - --------------------'------------ ------- -------- .FROM 60THAP.p ST. ! :ON EDINGER AVENUE ; $85,200 1 122,200 1 52,000 ! 140,000 : ----- 1 ----- f.49,440 : f11,814 ! 'TO.S.P. RAILROAD : ' ! :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS : : : : ! 1 :SOUTH OF EDINGER ! ----- 1 140,000 : $500 1 ----- 121,300 1 128,300 ; 140,140 ; 1103,615 : ----------- ------------- ------------- :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS : :NORTH OF EDINGER. i ----- ! 126,600 ; f100 : ----- I $20,400 ! 1238,440 : t286,040 : f328,ii+0 1 ' :FROM S.P. kAlLRDAD; -----------,-------------,-------------,-------------'------------ -------- ---'----------- ------------ ! :CITY R!k IMPROVEMENTS: :TO Y'LY H.B. :ON EDINGER AVENUE 149,500 $8,400 ' 1i,100 ' $40,000 ! 197,000 : 1113,850 ' :CENTER.ENTRANCE ION SITE IMPROVEMENTS ; 1 1 ! ---------- 1 ------_-- , -___-----1 ------ ---------- ! (SOUTH OF EDINGER : ----- ! f0 f0 , f0 ! 0 : f0 : f0 : : :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS : !NORTH OF EDINGER 1 - ----- : 128,700 1 11,000 ; ----- : 121,000 : f2199,100 : 1349,8CO ; 1402,270 : ' :FROM k'LY H.B. : _ 1 1 1 ! --------- ----------- ------------- ------------- : !CITY P.lY IMPROVEMENTS: : 1 : ! 1 : :CENTER ENTRANCE :ON EDINGER AVENUE 1 1114,000 1 f16,500 ! $2,200 : f80,000 ! ----- ! ----- 1212,700 : 1244,605 ' !TO SHER LN. :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS ! :SOUTH OF EDINGER ! ----- ! 118,000 : $300 1 ----- ! 19,400 : 147,200 ! 174,500 : 185:675 : '-----------------'---------------------'-------------'-------------'---------------------------'------------- ------------ ------- ------------- : !ON SITE 1MPROVFMENTS : I I ! , ! :NORTH OF EDINGER 1 ----- : 129,600 I f1,004 ! ----- : 121,3C4 1 $291,700 1 $343,600 : $395,140 (FROM SHER LN. :CITY A!k OVE IMPRMENTS: : ! : :ON EDINGER AVENUE 1 164,400 ! 125,700 ! 12,700 ! 180,040 : ----- 1 ----- 1 1178,300 : f205,045 : :TO PAP.Y.SIDE LN. I I : I ---------------------'-------------'-------------'-------------'------------ : :ON SITE lMPRDVEMEHTS : : : ! : : 1 : ' I (SOUTH OF EDINGER : ----- : 14,000 $1,200 1 ----- 1 134,100 1 f0 : 134,b00 i 145,195 ; ! I ! :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS : ! I : :NORTH OF EDINGER : ----- 1 116,000 ' f500 , ----- 1 116,300 : $157 800 : 1190 600 : f?14 190 I ---------- ------`------ ------------ ------------- t , , :FROM PARKSIDE LN. :CITY Rik IMPROVEMENTS! I ! : : !ON EDINGER AVENUE ! 195,500 ! 17,600 : $2,200 1 i80,00 I ----- I ----- 1165,300 : f213,f45 : ' :TO BEACH BLVD. I ---------'-------------'---------- -----------' ---------------------'-------------'----- --i500 :------------'- : :ON SITE IMPROVEMENTS ! : I I ! 1 I I ! : !SOUTH OF EDINGER : ----- ! $8,000 , ----- 127,600 I 164,200 1 1100,300 1 6115,345 : 1------------------1---------------------'-------------'-------------'-------------'-------------'---------- ---1----------- -----'-------------' I 1 : I I I 1 ' I :SUBTOTAL COST 1" 1414,100 : 1305,600 , 115,800 1320,000 ' 1195,100 ; 11,721,800 : 12,972,600 ' TOTAL ! i : PROJECT I : 1 I I ! :SUBTOTAL f 15% CONT. 1 $476,215 : f351,440 : f18,114 ! f368,000 : f224,545 : f1,980,410 : ----- 1 13,418,490 I 1 ------------ '----------- ---------- C:BIOICOSTEST.YY.I GDA,JSM EXHIBIT D-2 a i i � APPENDIX 1 1 � NoaaSREPKE. INC W U z a a H wz xw a w a H � w z �� � x H � a � z w x H z c� z o zw H H U' A W z W H H � H z z w x H a AlmTERNATE ENHANCED EVtRANCE : 1 OF * 3 WESTERLY HUNTINGTON CENTER ENTRANCE .'a !!Mae r. EDINGER AVE .. 1 1 - o� 1 CL en LLJ ALTERNATE ENHANCED CENT-• ' • CENTER ENTRANCE LON Lu cc cc ui f ' � � l STE'RLY • .rENTER ENTRANCE ��. .. EDINGER AVENUE. tu s r n W W ] U xz ww � A � z 0 as W N U W x H A 0 W U FROM:PUBLIC WORKS TO: 714 730 6396 FEB 22, 1993 e:06AM 9376 P.02 Ejy Der- 01*fbua rc yy E KO ' fiEB 7 9 1993 Freeway 2 03 2La industrial Col inapriveark, Inc. 1V Nl�lV7�lA'rplV ' Santa Ana, California 92705 ' February 18, 19932 Anthony A. Folaron City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department ' 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 ' Dear Tony, As we discussed on Thursday, February 4 , 1993 , you ' indicated that Huntington Center had withdrawn its support for the project to widen Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street (the Precise Plan) . As a result, the construction part of the project has been ' delayed indefinitely. You mentioned that the staff still plans to present the Precise Plan for approval in March or April. However, you told me that staff no longer intends to recommend the left-turn lane into the Rosalynn's ' parking lot for west-bound traffic on Edinger and it has been eliminated from the Plan that will be presented. You told me that the Plan will also show the lengthened bus ' bay, which would result in eliminating the driveway and parking in front of Ortho. As I discussed with you, Freeway Industrial Park ' strenuously opposes the changes discussed above. Freeway Industrial Park had been inclined to support the Precise Plan and to dedicate the valuable frontage on the south side of Edinger, in exchange for 1) the left-turn lane, 2) ' the shortened bus bay (and no elimination of the driveway and parking at the front of Ortho) , 3) re-paving and re-striping of the Rocalynn's and Ortho parking lots and 4) improved signage to direct customers to the Gothard ' . Street entrance. You said that the issue could be re-opened, if we were to put our intentions into writing. ' I would appreciate your efforts in this regard. If you have any questions, please call me at (714) 744-4526. ' Yours truly, e___k_ _D C. `,- anette Trotter Ditkowsky ' Chief Operating Officer 1 ------------------------------------- ' OCTA I Co vti b_LA�S I0 tBOARD OF DIRECTORS December 15, 1992 Gaty L.Hausdoifer e ( \ `��Vl.0—' Chairman 4 r x Dana Reed � \J Vice-Chairman Mr. Warren Re e r—�X• `/ William D.Mahoney Norris-Repko . nc. rDirector 18231 Irvine venue 1rvPicmer Suite 204 Director Tustin, CA 92680 ' Thomas F.Riley Director RE: Proposed Bus Turnout Location at Eastbound Edinger Avenue/farside Don R.Roth `Director Gothard Street r � Charles V.Smith Director Dear Warren: r Gaddi H.Vasquez j Director It is crucial that the bus turnout length remain as is. This location not only serves five Bob wahlstrom routes, but also is a timepoint for two of those routes. What this means is, that a bus ' Director could be in the turnout from 2 to 5 minutes. If the turnout is shortened, any additional HarriettM.Feder buses arriving will either have to board and off-load passengers outside of the turnout, Director or wait until the first bus pulls out. Either way, the travel lane will be blocked. Daniel H.Young Director ' If necessary to accommodate the businesses on this corner, a driveway can be Governors Ez-Ofricio incorporated into the turnout design. The driveway should be placed at the western end Member of the turnout. Sarah L.Catz Alternate ' if you should have any further comments, or questions feel free to contact me at 638- ' Eileen Krause 925p, extension 4500. Alternate Roger R.Stanton Altemate Respectfully, �r pr (Bill Batory Senior Technician i rStops and Zones Section I Facilities/Engineering Department 1 c: City of Huntington Beach file Ir Orange County Transportation Authority 11222 Acacia Parkway/Garden Grove/California 92640-5208/(714)638-9000/Fax(714)539-2076 1 I ■ i wa v _ � i T� .--c-•• -, a:.-. .,,-.. ._ � _ �7�'� VTR'+'• r FILE COPY ; r 1 8 2 3 1 =RV=N E AVENUE S U 2 T E 2 0 ,4 TU S T=N , CAL I F ORN=A 9 2 G 8 O ( 7 1. 4 ) 7 3 0— G 4 1 O FAX ( 7 1 4 ) 7 3 0 — G 3 9 G v r .r � LETTER O F TRAN SM=T TAL y r DATE: December 11, 1992 JOB #: 82-01 y TO: Bill Batory PROJECT: Edinger Ave. OCTA jr Stops & Zones i 11222 Acacia Pkwy Garden Grove, CA 92642 rVIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) MAIL ( ) MESSENGER r ( ) BLUEPRINTER. . .CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS ( ) YOUR PICK UP FOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) REVIEW r ( ) APPROVAL .'. (x) YOUR ACTION ` ( ) YOUR FILES YOUR INFORMATION ( ) YOUR USE i ( ) PER YOUR REQUEST ( ) PER REQUEST OF. r ---------- -----------------------------------------__ NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 2 alternate Exhibits for. bus bay E/O Gothard rStreet (eastbound) r REMARKS: Bill, We realize that you would prefer the full bus bay alternative but if this is not agreeable to the Ortho property owner then could you live with the shortened bus bay alternate? r Please respond-at-you-earliest-convenience. ------------------+ r ------------------------------ Randall Berry, P.E. r - . i W03 311A 1 N ORR=S--REPKE , =NC _ 1 8 2 3 1 2 RV=N E AVENUE , S U 2 T E 204 TUS T S N , CAL=F ORN 2 A 9 2 G 8 O ( 714 ) 730—G41. 0 FAX ( 73_ 4 ) 730 —G39G LETTER OF TRAN SM=TTAL 1 PATE: December 4, 1992 JOB #: 82-01 TO: Mark Bozorth PROJECT: Edinger Ave. GoodYear Precise Plan 1 1000 N. . Kraemer Place Anaheim, CA 92806 1 VIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) MAIL ( ) MESSENGER ( ) BLUEPRINTER. . .CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS t ( ) YOUR PICK UP FOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) REVIEW ( ) APPROVAL ' (x) YOUR ACTION ( ) YOUR FILES ( ) YOUR INFORMATION ' ( ) YOUR USE (x) PER YOUR REQUEST ( ) PER REQUEST OF 1 NNO. COPIES =----==DESCRIPTION 3 Highlighted copies of Exhibits 1, 2, & 4 (bus bay options at Goodyear Auto Center at south- east corner of Edinger Avenue and Parkside Lane, accessors parcel #142-081-28) REMARKS: Mark, The enclosed Exhibits show the options we dis- cussed at our 12-2-92 meeting at the City. Please circulate copies to the necessary people at your office to determine which optiorPyou find acceptable. At our meeting we all seemed to be leaning towards Exhibit 2, pending your office's approval and pending the City's approval to provide 2 parking spaces off of 1, the Goodyear site on the adjacent City redevelopment owned empty parcel. The City has agreed that if Goodyear selects Exhibit 2 as acceptable the necessary off-site parking will be made avail- able. A NORR2S—REPKE , 2 dO3 � �r Z 8 2 3 1. =RV 2 N E AVENUE , S U=T E 2 0 4 TU S T=N , CAL 2 F ORN=A 9 2 G 8 0 ( 7 1 4 ) 7 3 O— G 4 1 0 FAX ( 7 1.4 ) 7 3 0 --G 3 9 G ' LETTER O F TRAN SM 2 TTAL ' DATE: December 4, 1992 JOB 1: 82-01 TO: Janette Trotter Ditkowsky PROJECT: Edinger Ave ' Freeway Industrial Park, Inc. Precise Plan 18092 Stratford Circle Villa Park, CA 92667-4514 VIA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) MAIL ( ) MESSENGER ( ) BLUEPRINTER. . .CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS ( ) YOUR PICK UP FOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . (x) REVIEW ' ( ) APPROVAL (x) YOUR ACTION ( ) YOUR FILES ' ( ) YOUR INFORMATION ( ) YOUR USE (x) PER YOUR REQUEST PER-REQUEST-OF--=-=__--- NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 Highlighted copies of the full size and ' shortened bus bay alternatives at the south east corner of Gothard Street and. Edinger Avenue in front of the Ortho Building. . ' REMARKS: Janette, Per your request at our meeting on 12-2-92, the enclosed Exhibits show the two bus bay alternatives for-your ' review and circulation amongst your board of directors. Please respond as to whether you will accept the shortened bus bay alternative. L) NORRIS-RERKE, INC. n Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors I _ 18231 IRVINE BLVD. • SUITE 204 • TUSTIN, CA 92660 • (714) 730-6410 FAX: (714) 730-6396 Jack P. Norris, PE Warren W. Repke, PE Issue Date Randy G. Be". PE Jos_ePh M. Loyatho, PLS ' December 11, 1992 NRI-82-01/25RM EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN ' MEETING MINUTES DATE: 12-2-92 2:OOPM-5:OOPM ' LOCATION: City of Huntington Beach (H.B. ) ' ATTENDEES: Tony Folaron, H.B. Stephen Kohler, H.B. Warren Repke, N.R.I. ' Randy Berry, N.R.I. Janette Trotter Ditkowsky, Freeway Industrial Park, Inc. Owners of Edinger Avenue ' Property East of Gothard St. , both north and south corners Mark Bozorth, GoodYear Tire & Rubber Co. , Leaseholder of Properties on northwest corner (Broadway Tire Center) and southeast corner (GoodYear Auto Center) of Parkside Lane and Edinger Ave. FREEWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK PORTION OF MEETING ' The meeting started at 2:OOPM± with the above listed H.B. and NRI representative (reps) and Ms. Ditkowsky. ' H.B. and NRI reps covered the projects general intent to improve traffic flow and develop a unified aesthetic theme for the Eding- er corridor. The specific Precise Plan goals on freeway indus- trial parks properties were then discussed. (See Precise Plan. ) Ms. Ditkowsky expressed her and her company's board of directors ' concerns as follows: Have not discussed with Ortho yet but most likely they would not accept the loss of parking in front of Ortho Building Rear entry to Ortho building is not aesthetic enough as ' is to be the- main entry. 1 v -dinger Precise Plan 12-2-92 Minutes Page 2 of 5 - They do not see the gains equal to the losses in coop- erating with the project and most likely can not sup- port the project as shown. ' - The present bad economy is making this a bad time to spruce up landscaping. ' - Presently they do not pay for landscaping maintenance (their tenants do) therefore they are concerned with ; the increase in landscaping and the potential associat- ' ed increase in maintenance which may result in in- creased cost to the owners. ' The Levitz/Sportsmart property on the northeast corner of Gothard and Edinger is also owned by them. They are concerned with the proposed right of way acquisition ' along this frontage. They do not want to loose any parking spaces there and do not feel that an increase a of landscaping is needed in this area. (They already have a 16' wide landscape strip. The Precise Plan maintains a 16' wide strip in this area. ) The right of way acquisition from the adjacent S.P rail ' road land to provide additional parking was also a concern. She was not sure how that would work. Who would own it? - She was concerned with the elimination of the two Unocal driveways closest to and on either side of the corner. Stephen assured her that this would most likely be a condition. of redevelopment regardless of the implementation of the Precise Plan. Warren reminded- Ms. Ditkowsky of the benefit the bus bay at the ' southeast corner would give to increase the flow of. traffic and thereby increase .the business exposure to customers. Warren also offered an alternate bus bay layout that reduced the size of the bay, reduced the required right of way acquisition, and allowed the continued driveway access and parking use in front of the Ortho building. Ms. Ditkowsky was more agreeable to this alter- native. Warren said that O.C.T.A (formerly O.C.T.D) may not be agreeable to this option. NRI sent a highlighted copy of this down sized bus bay alternative and the original full bus bay to ' Ms. Ditkowsky on December 4, 1992, for her circulation and com- ments from her board of directors on December 4 , 1992 and on December 11, 199 to the OCTA for their feedback. ' NRI suggested other alternatives requiring reciprocal access and parking between the Unocal and Levits parcels with the goal to maximize the use of available space taken up by parallel parking isles and to further reduce another driveway access to the Unocal ' NORRIS-REPKE, INC. Adinger Precise Plan 12-2-92 Minutes • Page 3 of 5 lot. Ms. Ditkowski was not sure what would be constructed to replace Unocal. Consideration would be given to replanning the site access when a tenant is known. ' Ms. Ditkowsky said the Rosalynn's restaurant owner was agreeable with the option of providing an additional west bound left turn access in the street median into this restaurant parking lot. ' This compromise is not an option though if the owners are not agreeable to the full bus bay and support of the project. Based on the meeting NRI received direction that the Precise Plan ' should show the full bus bay option in front of Ortho's, no additional left turn access to Rosalynn's and the full widening in front of the Levits building, regardless of the fact that a phase I construction project may be forced to show something less or omit the reach from the S.P.R.R tracks to Gothard Street altogether. ' GOODYEAR PORTION OF MEETING ' Mr. Bozorth joined the meeting at 3:OOPM± after Ms. Ditkowski ' left. Again Warren explained the general goals of the Precise Plan and then the specific affects to the frontage of the Good- Year leased property. Mr. Bozorth could not accept the initial concept, Exhibit 1, which called for an ideal double bus bay, eliminated the driveway from Edinger into the GoodYear property, provided a combined use driveway entrance to the east closer to the First Interstate property, and required a reciprocal access and parking agreement with GoodYear and the adjacent parcel presently empty and owned ' by the City Redevelopment Agency. It was also expressed by Stephen that the Redevelopment Agency would have a problem with providing the 6 reciprocal parking spaces on its property due to possible incomberences on future use. Mr. Bozorth was more agreeable to Exhibit 2 which showed a double bus bay but still allowed a driveway entrance to GoodYear from Edinger. This alternative would require the elimination of 2 parking spaces in the front of the GoodYear building. Mr. Bo- zorth said they could probably live with that but that replace- ment spaces would have to be provided somewhere close off site. The GoodYear center has 10 employees and they all need nearby parking. Parking in the back, presently used by the employees, could be converted to customer overflow. He could not make the ' final decision himself. ..He would have to check with the land., owner's real estate person and with GoodYear's Akron, Ohio Of- fice. The Redevelopment Agency would also investigate whether a 2 space reciprocal parking agreement would be acceptable on their adja- cent lot. (Past experience revealed significant obstacles and ' NORRIS-REPKE, INC. Edinger Precise Plan 12-2-92 Minutes ' Page 4 of 5 ' reduced land value when such agreements were entered into by the agency. ) At the end of the meeting after Mr. Bozorth left, a decision was made by Stephen that it could be assumed that 2 ' spaces would be provided "offsite" and most likely they would be on the adjacent parcel presently owned by the Redevelopment Agency. Consequently this information was included in the exhib- it submittal package to Goodyear so a firm decision could be made ' by GoodYear regarding Exhibit 2. An Exhibit 4 was also presented to Mr. Bozorth which showed only ' a small corner of the GoodYear lot being impacted by a reduced and eastward shifted bus bay. The existing GoodYear parking remained intact at 10 spaces. ' NRI sent highlighted copies of Exhibits 1, 2, and 4 (Exhibit 3 was eliminated from consideration before the meeting) to Mr. Bozorth's attention on December 4, 1992 for circulation and a ' decision. Mr. Bozorth intended to push Exhibit 2 in the interest of cooperation with the big picture. Treatment of the GoodYear A sign would also have to be figured out at a later date. ' The proposed impacts to the frontage of the Broadway tire center, which GoodYear also operates, were also discussed. Mr. Bozorth ' did not express any concerns about the proposed improvements since no loss of parking spaces were proposed and the over all impacts were minimal. ' Mr. Bozorth was also requested, in NRI's package, to find out how long GoodYears lease was and who the owners are. ' GENERAL DISCUSSION PORTION OF MEETING After Mr. Bozorth left NRI and H.B. 'discussed other question areas that needed the City's input and resolution in order to ' expedite the completion of the precise plan report. The items discussed and resolved were as follows: ' 1. Show full bus bay at Ortho lot. 2. Show full widening at Levits lot 3. Do not show the additional west bound left turn access ' into Rosalynn's restaurant driveway. 4. Go with the Exhibit 2 alternative in front of the GoodYear property. Assume that two spaces can be provided "off site" . ' 5. Go with the east bound dual left turn option at the Westerly Huntington Center Entrance. This requires widening the. entrance (on the north leg of the inter- section) and rearranging the parking layout in the Montgomery Ward Automotive lot with the elimination of some of the spaces. The eliminated spaces will easily ' be made up by the construction of a future parking structure required when the center redevelops. ' NORRIS-REPKE, INC. i linger Precise Plan i2-2-92 Minutes Page 5 of 5 6. Keep right of way acquisition costs in the report cost estimates. 7. The City will provide new unit prices per square foot to use in right of way acquisition estimate. (Use ' $37.00/S.F. per Tony on 12-7-92. ) 8. Modify the driveways into the Der Weinerschnitzel lot per NRI's judgment combined with the owners request in a letter that Warren recalled receiving. (Find and ' verify letters request. ) 9a. NRI will field check the lot in. front of the Burlington Coats property to verify whether the parking layout has ' changed recently. 9b. NRI will investigate whether the parkway in front of the Burlington Coats and the adjacent RTC owned lot to the east will allow the modification of the existing ' 10' wide sidewalk and 4' wide landscape strip to a 8' wide sidewalk and 6' wide landscape strip. This would minimize the affects on site by expanding the landscape ' towards the Edinger roadway rather than towards the properties. A controlling element is what impact this might have on the existing underground Edison line that ' runs under the sidewalk in the 2' wide sidewalk area in question. NRI will field check for vaults and other obstacles to this concept. Edison must also be ap- proached, if other findings don't rule it out first, to find out their concerns. Landscape over the lines may cause tree root conflicts in the future. ' The meeting ended at 5:OOPM±. NRI will rely on these notes as the approved records of matters discussed and conclusions reached unless written notice is re- . ceived by NRI within ten (10) calendar days of the issue date of this report. tSubmitted By: Norris-Repke, Inc. Randall Berry, P.E. ' C:Randy/8201-25rm.mnt . w NORRIS-REPKE, INC. ' OCTA ' BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1November 11 1992 i Gary L.HausdoAer Chairman ' Dana Reed Mr. Warren R e RECEIVED ir'0'j 12 '992 Vice-Chairman wdliamD.Mahoney ! Norris-Repk Inc. ' Direotor 18231 Irvin Avenue Iry Pickier Suite 204 Director Tustin, CA 92680 Thomas F.Riley Director RE: Proposed Bus Turnout Location at Eastbound Edinger Avenue/farside Don R.Roth Parkside Lane Director Charles V.Smith i Director Dear Warren: i Gaddi H.Vas4uez Director ; Attached you will find two exhibits that I have modified. Both choice one and two would Bob Wahlstrom work for us operationally. If for some reason one of them cannot be utilized, alternate ' Director „B,! will have to do. Harriett M.Wieder Diree°r ' If you should have any comments, or questions feel free to contact me at 638-9250, Daniel H.Young i. extension 4500. ' Director Russell s.Ughtcx-Offiap I Respectfully Governor's Ex-Otficio i Member Sarah L.Catz ABemate E7een Krause 11� Alternate 'J Bill Batory RogerR.Stanton' AlternateSenior Technician Stops and Zones Section Facilities/Engineering Department c: City of Huntington Beach file Orange County Transportation Authority ' 11222 Acacia Parkway/Garden Grove/California 92640-5208/(714)638-9000/Fax(714)539-2076 rNORR SS—REF-i�E NC . 18 2 3 1. SRVSTTE ENUE , SLJSTE 2 0 4 T'USTSN , CALS NSA 9 2 6 8 0 ( 714 ) 730- 641 AX ( 7 ,14 ) 730-- 6396 r LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL FILE COPY . . -------------------------------------. r o un - L o c.T tk r STot�S ZQtV 5 im mm $Z- 01 Z2 Z P, c.Ac� A PKvJY G IiRD�,J GQa�I� � cIa• 9 269-Z PROJErr E b IN U�/�. �v F , NE ARE EMIMING BY IY I HAIL � mmm F1 BLOEPRIMM � YOUR PICK-OP .....NO. _ COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 hLT EY�-N PT E 6:x NI►3/ 77_r Faw2 �s'v S f3A --,�� pf�2KS�fJ� C.AnIF �F-As7- 00vrj0) Re�ARKs: 11.1. WF AlIZ� THAT YoV P/Z rr,1z r S A i3L� Tb �3 V r t F TK!s_ rs 1%10 r AGrLF � SK . . .cc� . w� P/ze.F� uh�.✓' . G. ' ovLp �� Ir ov ? GoULo nv :!.l l/c a `��`� iJo y y P4-FA s- 57 ,2 ^S7 Sower Ar ' yoV CA^/ &Ce-043' r w f? N F E'D Yoy 12- r 97 D l3Ac-IC PX/ole- To 13r-G /i`'G owNF L TAW-r Ws NEW Is SENT FOR YOUR EILBs YOUR Oss YOUR 97ION YOM I1mTION aPER YOUR REQDESY' PER RBQDEST OF BPPWAL W� REVIEW� ® o /Z r a: BY Win LAW OFFICES ' PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. WILHELM & WALDRON A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2603 MAIN STREET - ANGELO J. PALMIERI• ELINOR J.VOTAW EAST TOWER - SUITE 1300 P. O. BOX 19712 RO r. CYNT ALAN H.W HER* N• JOEL P. E WOLCOTT IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 9 2 714-6 22 8 IRVINE. CA 9 2 713-9 712 ALAN N.WIENER' JOEL P. KCW ROBERT C. IHRKE' MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO (714) 851-9400 JAMES E.WILHELM' NORMAN J. RODICH WRITERS DIRECT DENNIS G. TYLER' LORI K. DAVIES gIAL N MBE ' MICHAEL J. GREENE* GARY C.WEISBERG FRANK C. ROTHROCK' KEITH A. LAUFER DENNIS W. GHAN' MICHAEL H. LEIFER DAVID D. PARR' MICHELE D. MURPHY CHARLES H. KANTER' SCOTT R. CARPENTER TELECOPIER 1714) 851-1554 ' GEORGE J.WALL RICHARD A.SALUS May 29, 1992 (7141 661-3844 L RICHARD RAWLS DOUGLAS M. STEVENS PATRICK A. HENNESSEY D.SUSAN WIENS (714) 757-1225 DON FISHER RONALD M. COLE (714) 851-23S1 GREGORY N.WEILER ROLAND P. REYNOLDS WARREN A.WILLIAMS CYNTHIA B. PAULSEN JOHN R. LISTER KELLY R. KIMBROUGH BRUCE W. OANNEMEYER SEAN P. O'CONNOR REFER TO FILE NO. •A FRO/[ifIOHAL COR►OMTION GF COUNSEL 0 7 2 4 2-0 0 7 ' MON. THOMAS J. UMBERG MEM06111 OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY ' Mr. Thomas Andrusky City of Huntington Beach Economic Development 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Freeway Industrial Park ' Dear Mr. Andrusky: This office represents Freeway Industrial Park ("Freeway") . _ ' As you know, Freeway is the fee owner of properties located. on Edinger Avenue, immediately east of Gothard Street, leased to Unocal and Levitz on the north side of Edinger and Rosalynn's ' Restaurant and Beds for Kids, Eastman West and Ortho Mattress ("Ortho/Eastman") on the south side of Edinger. All of these locations will be affected by the proposed street widening of ' Edinger Avenue as outlined in the draft Precise Plan and Report of Edinger Avenue from Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard. On the north side of Edinger Avenue, the City/Redevelopment Agency is proposing to take land from the Levitz and Unocal sites for street widening and landscaping. The proposed Precise Plan also contemplates the elimination of the primary access points from the Unocal site. With regard to the Levitz site, the ' proposed Plan contemplates removal of parking. The plan includes modification of one and elimination of the other Edinger access ' points. On the south side of Edinger Avenue, the proposed project includes a taking of land for right of way and landscaping. ' Specifically as to the Ortho/Eastman site, all Edinger access and PALMIERI.TYLER,WIENER,WILHELM&WALDRON Mr. Thomas Andrusky May 29, 1992 ' Page 2 ' parking is sought to be eliminated. The "replacement" parking sought to be -imposed is further from the building. All customers will have to approach the building from the direction of the rear or service area. Therefore, service to the buildings may be impaired. The proposed project will have similar negative impacts on the Rosalynn's Restaurant site. The front set-back of the restaurant is substantially decreased. For both Rosalynn's and ' Ortho/Eastman, the proposed bus stop will create undesirable noise and aesthetic impacts. Overall, the Freeway properties will suffer reduced land ' area, reduced access, reduced parking and increased operating expenses. Consecquently, the properties and businesses will suffer diminution in value. Notwithstanding the above, the City/Redevelopment Agency asks that Freeway give up land and suffer the effects of the project without compensation. Based on the project as proposed, this proposal is unacceptable. This is ' a proposed "Public Works" project which is designed to benefit the public as a whole. . However, the City/Redevelopment Agency seeks to impose a particular financial burden on a few property owners and businesses. ' The following changes in the proposed Plan must be included in the plans for the project: ' • Compensation for land taken and damaged; • The project should increase access, not decrease it. ' Therefore, a median break on Edinger permitting left in, left out access for Levitz and Rosalynn's Restaurant must he incorporated in the Plan; ' • Retention of all access points for the Unocal site; ' • Retention of Edinger vehicular access for Ortho/Eastman; •' Permit West bound traffic on Edinger to make a U-turn at Gothard; and • Guarantee that parking at the Levitz site will not be ' diminished. 1. t PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER,WILHELM&WALDRON Mr. Thomas Andrusky May 29, 1992 ' Page 3 tWe would appreciate a prompt written response to the foregoing. Thank you. Very truly yours, • icha 1 if MHL:mlf ' cc: Mr. Anthony A. Folaron Mr. George Trotter Mrs. Janette Ditkowsky Mr. Warren Repke, Norris-Repke, Inc. �f ' WATT MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD. • SANTA MONICA,CA 90405 • TEL.(310)314.243(1 1 FAX(3{0)399-6()gI ' May 21 , 1992 . ECEIVED ' Mr. Tom Andrusky The City of Huntington Beach e�) P.O. Box 190 MAY 2 ' 1' 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,DEPARTMENT OF ' Dear Mr. Andrusky: ECONOMIC DEVELOPM"C1� After attending the workshop held on May 7, 1992, we are in agreement :with. the proposed changes for ingress and egress to Edinger Avenue if the following can be agreed upon : ' 1 . Instead of eliminating the driveway in front of Wienerschnitzel, we would agree to having it widened and moved east in the direction of Riches Donuts . ' 2 . We would only agree to other changes for bus lanes or widening of the street if they did not impact the status of the signage currently in place. ' 3. We would need to receive approval from major tenants in the center on proposed changes due to Lease restrictions -. which may allow for early terminations . - In addition to the above , I have enclosed a copy of a letter received from Wienerschnitzel regarding their concerns . Ile would need to know more specific information regarding the formation of a landscape maintenance district before ' agreeing to participation in this type of program. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact ' me at ( 310) 314-2440 . ' Sincerely ' )-'e dy C 1 Propert a ger / �MIOIM♦ HAMBURGER xalarch Group � sTMD ' May 6, 1992 O - RECEIVE ' M V 0 R 1992 Huntington Beach No. 1 ..... WATT MANAGEMENT COMPANY AnS d ' P. O. Box 2114 Santa Monica, CA 90406 ' Attention: Wendy Campbell, Property Manager Re: Public Workshop to Discuss the Precise Plan and Report of ' Edinger Avenue From Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard Dear Wendy: ' On - May 5, 1992 , - you sent me a copy of a letter dated April 22, 1992 , from the Economic Development and Public Works Department of the City of Huntington Beach, in regard to the subject Public ' Workshop scheduled for May 7 , 1992 . Due. to our long-term leasehold interest in the premises at 7622 Edinger Avenue, Huntington Beach, please be aware that we have the following concerns: ' 1) Our customers currently exit from our drive thru service lane on to Edinger Avenue. If this driveway is removed, our ' customers would have to go back into the center to exit, which could have an adverse affect on traffic in the center; ' 2) We are opposed to any street improvements which would diminish the visibility of our monument sign or which would result in having to relocate the sign; ' 3) We are not in favor of street landscape improvements, if such improvements will result in additional costs to the property owner; I have not had an opportunity to review the proposed plans, so my concerns are derived from my brief telephone conversation with you ' and from the items in the questionnaire which accompanied the above mentioned letter. Thank you. Sincerely, ' GALARDI GROUP INC. Cathy Wood Property Manager P n- BOX 7460 4440 VON KARMAN AVE. NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA U2658.74M ' PHONE 014) 752•sSk>> CITI OF HUNTIN GIN BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 926a8 Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department ' Director (714) 535-5431 ' April 22, 1992 ' To: Property Owners Located on Edinger Avenue 1? Y $ From Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard From: Economic Development and Public Works Department ' Subject: Public Workshop to Discuss the Precise Plan and Report of Edinger Avenue From Gothard Street to Beach Boulevard ' DA= Thursday. May 7, 1992 Time: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Place: Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Lower Level, Room B-7 For information call Economic .Development (714) 536-5542, Tom Andrusk p Y ' The schedule is as follows: 8:30 a.m to 9:30 a.m.: Property owners northside of Edinger Avenue from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Beach Boulevard. 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.: Property owners on the south side of Edinger Avenue from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Beach Boulevard. 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.: Property owners on the north and south side of Edinger ' Avenue from Gothard Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad. '. Please R.S.V.P. by Thursday, April 30, 1992 to (714) 536-5542. AAF:ERC:gd cc: Tom Andrusky Enclosure 3216g/2 �LIC WORKS TO: 714 730 6396 APR 6, 1992 7:28AM #986 P.02 CITY OF HUNTINGTaN BEACH - INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION. HUN71NGTON IEACN 1 TO: Tony Folaron Civil Engineer As istant FROM: Mike Connor Assistant Planner ' SUBJECT: PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS REGARDING EDINGER AVENUE STREET WIDENING PLAN DATE: April 2, 1992 After having comprehensively reviewed the Edinger Avenue street widening plan, the Planning Division is optimistic that the proposed ' improvements would be very effective in significantly improving the circulation on Edinger Avenue. In particular the bus turnouts, the double left turn lanes and the elimination of many mid-block curb cuts will have a great impact. The following information and items are needed in order to process the request for the pecise plan of street alignment for Edinger Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Gothard Street: ' 1. Legal description of the ultimate right-of-way area . ' 2 . Typical street sections at various locations such as the narrowest, the typical and the widest locations. 3 . One typed list and two sets of gummed mailing labels for all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and all business tenants in the area. Each label for property owners must include the assessors parcel number. (see attached sheet) 9 . Six sets of plans with street sections and two sets reduced ' to 8 1/2" X 11" . 5 . A General Plan Amendment to change the circulation element ' designation of Edinger Avenue will be required. Edinger is currently designated as a primary arterial highway. Due to its current traffic volumes and the number of lanes, Edinger will need to be reclassified as a major arterial . ' This modification will require additional environmental review. 1 i:PUBLIC WORKS TO: 714 730 6396 APR 6, 1992 7:29AM #986 P.03 4, jril 3, 1992 ''Page Two s Upon reviewing the most recent traffic counts on Edinger west of Gothard, it appears that there may be a need to designate the whole street from Newland to Bolsa Chica as a major arterial. ' 6. Some clarification is needed from the Traffic Division regarding the relationships between street widths, design capacity, traffic volumes, level of service and designation. It will be necessary to have a memo clrifying these relationships prior to any further review of the Eidnger Avenue Widening Project. Other Planning Comments are:.. 1. The mid-block left turn movement shown from the south ' side of Edinger Avenue between Sher and Parkside into westbound traffic should be reviewed further. The Planning staff would like to review the Traffic ' Engineer' s comments regarding this movement. 2. Improvement No. E.4. is recommended to provide internal ' circulation between Great Western Bank and the adjacent center with the elimination of the curb cut. The Planning staff strongly supports this proposal. ' 3 . The Environmental Resources Section has determined that a Negative Declaration may be processed. The comment period for the Negative Declaration closed March 13, 1992 ' however, if the project description should change or the boundaraies expanded, the document must be amended to reflect the changes. This may require additional studies. Additional Note: I will be sending you a notice for the public hearing once it is scheduled. Please plan on attending or have a ievresentative from your department at the Planning Commission ' hearing. MC: lp (2926d) 1 JBLIC WORKS TO; 714 730 6396 APR 6, 1992 7:29AM 9986 P.04 ' STAFF SLMMRY EDINGER CORRIDOR PRECISE PLAN AND REPORT 1 The following plan and report are for the purpose of implementing recommendations in the ' Huntington Redevelopment Plan via creation of a planning document for the future .. development of Edinger Avenue, from Beach Boulevard to Gothard Street. It is the intent of this document to precisely define certain street elements, such as: ' a) number, location, and width of through lanes, east and west b) location and width of right turn-only lanes c) location, width, and length of single and dual left turn lanes d) location, width, and length of bus turnouts e) location, width, and length of raised medians f) curb to curb dimensions ' g) parkway width including sidewalk width h) street right-of-way width 1) location, width, and length of on-site (on private property) landscape strip adjacent to t Edinger Avenue right-of-way j) landscape concept plant palette for item i) and the street median Also, this plan and report recommends modifications to the major entry ways to shopping malls adjacent to Edinger Avenue. These modifications include: 1) width of entry ' 2) number of lanes 3) median width 4) landscape treatment of median and adjacent area Lastly, the plan and report suggesttreatment for existing and future driveways and off-street parking, but are not part of the purpose, given above, for the Precise Plan/Report. These suggestions are made only in the context of presenting a complete plan to meet the goal of providing improved traffic circulation on Edinger Avenue. Suggest is the action word. The City Staff does not care to dictate or impose driveway closures and/or modifications on existing business owner/operators. Any modifications would be made only with their concurrence. Future development, of course, will be in conformance with the driveway concept recommendations given on the Precise Plan and in compliance with all Community Development Department requirements. ' AAF:gd ' 3202g/6 December 6, 1991 ' RECEIVED F�or_VE:Lopr,;[hi7 0-r 7 ' Ms. Barbara A. Kaiser Deputy City Administrator Economic Development ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 ' Re: Edinger Corridor - Huntington Beach Mall ' Dear Barbara: We are currently reviewing the proposed Edinger widening drawing/overlays with our traffic consultants to determine ' the acceptability of their impact on the Huntington Beach Mall parking field. As you are aware the proposed taking of our property to facilitate the widening will require ' extensive rework of the entrances, stall layout and drive lanes. As we have stated to both you and Tom Andrusky in the past, we support the effort to improve traffic flow along Edinger and want to cooperate in every way possible to see the plan ' implemented. It is my understanding that the redevelopment agency will absorb all costs associated with the street widening and rework of our parking field and drive lanes with Huntington Beach Mall being expected to dedicate the land taken for the widening. While that may be acceptable to us there is another element we feel must be included in the equation. We have long sought to achieve freeway signing identity for Huntington Beach Mall equal to that at Westminster Mall - a sign that would impact to southbound I- 405 traffic with the message that Huntington Beach Mall was at the next exit (Beach Boulevard) and that would give people the opportunity to take the Beach Boulevard exit to reach the mall. (Current identity isn't visible until one has missed the opportunity to use the Beach Boulevard exit) . 1 The MaceRich Company --- - -- --11 ��O I nvcXeinnr-% re On74n 74-1/AA-i-nA17 i - r Ms. Barbara A. Kaiser December 6, 1991 City of Huntington Beach Page 2 r 1 The only site that meets our needs is owned by the City of Huntington Beach and I believe is a water-well facility. We r consider that site important to the future growth and success of Huntington Beach Mall and would want some form of use agreement or lease (which would enable us to erect and r maintain a monument sign at that location) included as part of any agreement we would sign on the Edinger Corridor. I have previously discussed this with Tom Andrusky and wanted ' you to be aware early on because I realize that several City departments would have to be involved. ' Again, we do want to and would give serious consideration to any agreement which encompasses all of our needs. Sincerely, ' THE MACERICH COMPANY roioj_L� �. *ryA0'//0t_) r Claude S. Keyzers, CSM Senior Vice President rCSK/cr cc: Tom Andrusky ' Charles Hallums Della Chadwell i r • r r r L NORRiI -RERKE, INC. Consulting Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors I 2882 WALNUT AVE. • SUITE A e TUSTIN, CA 926BO • (714) 730-6410 Jack P.Norris CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIL ENGINEER Warren W.Repke EDINGER AVENUE PRECISE PLAN CIVIL ENGINEER PROPOSED PHASE I CONSTRUCTION October 2, 1991 GOAL• Develop a Phase I construction project for the improvement of Edinger Avenue to be considered for implementation in the near future. CRITERIA• 1. Proposed Phase I improvements to be compatible with the Edinger Avenue Precise Plan as the proposed concept for ultimate improvements. 2 . Driveway elimination only with permission of property owner or where justified by technical data (accidents or safety incompatibility with proposed improvements) . 3 . No parking loss unless approved by affected property owner. 4 . Minimize negative impacts to adjacent properties. 5. Replace existing landscape areas affected by the project. 6. Minimum bus bay of 50' with 40' transitions. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: A. Gothard Street Intersection 1. Improvements per Precise Plan. B. Gothard Street to Southern Pacific Railroad. 1. Northside Improvements per Precise Plan except no driveway eliminations on Edinger or Gothard at northeast corner. 2. Southside Alt. A - Improvements per Precise Plan. Trade elimination of driveway and parking in front of Ortho/Eastman building (AP 142-511-04) for U-turn at Gothard for westbound traffic. 1 1 1 ' Alt. B - Provide 130' bus bay between existing drive- ways with easterly driveway encroachment. ' - Provide curb return driveway at Rosalynn's. 3. Center Median ' Construct per Precise Plan including landscaping. C. Southern Pacific Railroad to westerly Huntington ' Center/Edinger Plaza entrance 1. Northside ' a. Street widening and .bus bay per Precise Plan. b. 5' landscaping strip behind sidewalk to replace ' existing. C. Modify on-site parking with net loss of one space-. ' 2. Southside No changes. 1 3. Center Median ' Per Precise Plan including landscaping. Only stripe for one left turn lane into Huntington Center. ' D. Huntington Center/Edinger Plaza Entrance 1. No widening on north. Curb return modifications only. ' 2. Traffic signal modifications. E. Westerly Huntington Center Drive/Edinger Plaza Entrance to Sher Lane 1. North Side - Per Precise Plan from entrance to 320' east (loss of 25 parking spaces) . ' Remove existing vacant building and replace with parking (85 spaces) . ' 2. South Side - Per Precise Plan ' 3. Center Median - Per Precise Plan including landscaping. Stripe for one left turn lane into Huntington Center. F. Sher Lane/Huntington Center Entrance 2 1. No widening on north side. Curb return modification only. 2. Traffic signal modifications. G. Sher Lane to Parkside Lane ' 1. Northside - Street widening per Precise Plan. ' - Provide 5' landscaping area to replace existing. No parking loss and no parking landscape island ' changes. (481- 25' - 18' = 5' ) 2 . Southside ' Alt. A: Per Precise Plan if property owner concurrence. ' Alt. B: Minimum concept 130' bus bay between existing driveways. - Revise driveway at 140+50 and 138+50 to curb - return type. No driveway eliminations. ' Alt. C: Partial Precise Plan improvements between Alt. A and Alt. B. ' 3 . Center Median Per Precise Plan including landscape. Stripe only single left turn into Huntington Center at Parkside. ' H. Parkside Lane Intersection ' _ No widening on north side. Curb returns only. Traffic signal modifications. - Remove raised island and restripe on south side. ' I. Parkside Lane to Beach Blvd. 1. Northside ' Alt. A: Widening per Precise Plan. 5' landscape area along right of way. Existing driveway to remain. Loss of 15 parking spaces. 3 Alt. B: ' - No widening. use right turn lane as through lane. - 130' bus bay (lose 4 spaces) . - _ _ Existing driveway to remain. 2. Southside ' Alt. A: Maximum - Per Precise Plan from Parkside to First Interstate ' - Bank. No changes from bank to Beach Blvd. tAlt. B: Minimum 130' bus bay between existing drives. Eliminate drive onto vacant parcel. Modify existing drives to curb return type. 3 . Center Median ' Per Precise Plan including landscaping. . ' W5:8201.PH1 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' HINTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH .ECEIVED OCT - 9 10 '! To Tony Folaron From Jim Otterson N Civil Engineering Assistant Traffic Engineer 1 Subject EDINGER CORRIDOR Date October 4, 19 LETTER - PALMIERI, et,al. We have reviewed the subject letter and considered the various recommendations made concerning the proposed improvements. Our comments will be limited to the traffic and circulation issues. The recommendations regarding the southeast corner and access to the restaurant cannot be accommodated given the physical dimensions of the street and medians. There is not sufficient room to insert another left turn pocket along this section of Edinger Avenue. The ability to make a U-turn will not be improved with the changes to be constructed with ' this project and is therefore not going to change. The comments regarding the entry to the Ortho/Eastman location are correct, but fail to acknowledge the Gothard entry availability for the site. Since that entry is not affected, the site access is reduced but not. eliminated. According to the preliminary plans, parking on-site would be affected. .A review of the site revealed severely deteriorated pavement in the entryway, which might be part of the refurbishing of the site. We should be ' prepared to work with the owner to improve this frontage and access. Perhaps the City would allow a variance to monument signage codes to allow larger signage on Edinger, (directing entry traffic to the Gothard Street entrance) and also identifying the entrance ' on Gothard. Several service station sites in the community have been modified as is proposed in the plan for the Unocal site. The deletion of one driveway and relocation of the remaining driveway to a more centered location on the site have been successful in each such location. We have no evidence to support that such a driveway configuration in any way ' diminishes the success of the service station operation. We do know that the on-street traffic flow is eased near the intersection without the driveway that traditionally was placed nearest the corner. ' If we can provide any additional information, please contact me at 5523. JDO:BHG:dw cc: Edinger Corridor Plan Robert Eichblatt, City Engineer Tom Andrusky, Economic Development ' 3049g/2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ' INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNnNGTON BEACH To Tony Folaron From ke Strange Public Works Senior Planner Subject EDINGER CORRIDOR Date July 19, 1991 The following comments are provided for the Edinger Corridor project: . ' 1. Loss of parking and/or landscaping will require action by the Zoning Administrator and/or Planning Commission. 2. Signage along Edinger will require relocation (freestanding ' signs) . Non-conforming signs must be made conforming as a result of the relocation. 3 . Closure of driveways will necessitate reciprocal driveway easements between property owners . This can be accomplished at the time of Planning Commission/Zoning . Administrator approval. MS. lp (0285d) 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ' Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 September 4, 1991 r RECEIV zocr 0_g W1 Mr. Claude S. Keyzers Senior Vice President ' The Macerich Company #500 Lakewood Center Mall P.O. Box 578 ' Lakewood, CA 90714 ` Re: Edinger Avenue Precise Plan; CC-737 Dear Mr. Keyzers: ' Thank you for your letter discussing the merits and shortcomings of the City's proposed Edinger Corridor Precise Plan. We are currently evaluating your suggestions along with those from adjacent business owners. Our intentions are to incorporate as many of the ' suggested modifications as possible in the final precise plan. We will contact you when the precise plan is completed, so you may review the plan before it is adopted. Sincerely, � o ' Tony Folaron Design AAF:dw ' cc: T. Andusky W. Repke — Norris Repke ' 3042g/3043g 1 -JUL-22-1991 13:58 FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO 97306396 P.02 RECEIVED July 17, 1991 J U i 2 2 i9g1 REDEVELOPMENT DEPT. - 142 - D -7I Mr. Thomas Andrusky Project Manager c�'Z City of Huntington Beach 9 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Street Improvements I 12. - O 1 Huntington Beach Mall Q Dear Tom: You asked that I give you a written response/reaction to our meeting of June 20, 1991. The consensus among my associates seems to be that while we concur that the street improvements should be made and will be of great benefit to all of the property owners in the neighborhood the burden falls parti- cularly hard on Huntington Beach Mall . • Ninety (90%) percent of the land to be taken will come from our site. • Whatever mechanisum you would utilize to pay for the improve- ments would most likely hit us the hardest. We absolutely cannot suffer the loss of any parking spaces let alone 221 as proposed. We would be in violation of our department store agreements if we went below the existing parking ratios - we have no spare parking! • Any parking given up by us would have to be replaced at no cost to us. If a deck were required for example, it would have to be funded by the City Redevelopment Agency or some other entity. We could not incur the cost of replacing parking taken from us. Tom, frankly I just don't see how this can be accomplished without a large amount of public money - we are not willing or able to assume a large financial burden to make this project happen. ' --The MaceRich Company *500 LAKEWOOD CENTER MALL P.O. BOX 578 LAKEWOOD. CA 90714 213/633.0437 Mr. Thomas Andrusky July 17, 1991 ' City of Huntington Ch Page 2 1 • ' While there may be particular benefit to the property owners who adjoin the proposed project, in actuality the entire community will benefit from the proximate results of improved traffic flow, shorter time trips and the ' ability to reduce traffic induced stress. • Therefore, we feel the entire community should particpate in the funding of this project. Huntington Beach Mall is not a strong enough financial position to assume a dispro- portionate share of the costs or even a proportionate share if that pro- portion is calculated using a smaller base as is currently proposed. ' We do want to continue working with you on this project and will. do all that is.within our means to help find a palatable solution. Sincerely , THE MACERICH COMPANY ' Claude S. eyzers, CSM Senior Yice President CSK/cr ' cc: Mace Siegel Dana Anderson Art Coppola Mike Siegel ' Charlie Hallums Della Chadwell Lori Gatto TOTAL P.03 ' 142- EDINGER ASSOCIATES ' P.O: Box 10187 Newport Beach, California 92658 ' July 12, 1991 ' Mr. Tony Folaron CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 tRe: Edinger Corridor; CC-737 Dear Tony: We were not in attendance at the City's Public Workshop to discuss the Edinger Corridor ' Precise Plan because we did not receive advance notice regarding the workshop.- Thank you for forwarding the information sent under your cover letter dated June 20, 1991. ' Our understandingof the modifications to the Corridor that would effect ourproperty is the ' closure of one of the two drive aprons providing ingress and egress for Edinger Plaza. We will not, under any circumstances, permit that drive apron to be closed. ' In order to construct the existing retail development, approximately 1978, our partnership acquired from the City of Huntington Beach a large parcel of land which we integrated into the project in order to construct a viable retail development. Even with the acquisition of the City's parcel, there was some questions as to whether or not we would proceed with the development because of the narrow frontage of the parcel and the extreme depth of the property. Anyone with retail shopping center development experience would be aware of the ' risk associated with developing a property with narrow frontage in relationship to the project's depth. In order for us to proceed, we received from the City of Huntington Beach prior to close of escrow, a covenant that the City would grant us the turn pocket and drive aprons as ' they currently exist. We will not permit that granted right to be rescinded now or anytime in the future. Good retail development with the ability to survive the sickly nature of the economy, must provide exceptional ingress and egress for its tenants in order to be successful. Eliminating the easterly driveway, apron adjoining the Taco Bell, would significantly diminish their ability ' to survive in the competitive fast food market. After almost a decade of struggle, they have - now reached sales-volumes which are providing them with a reasonable return on their ' investment. It is totally unacceptable that the.City would even consider limiting their ability to do business by closing the very vital apron that serves their fast food restaurant. ' Mr. Tony Folaron ' July 12, 1991 Page Two ' It is our opinion closing one of the two drive aprons would increase additional congestion on Edinger Avenue for eastbound traffic since traffic entering the one remaining apron could stack in the street rather than allowing free flow into the property through two aprons. We also believe that by eliminating one of the aprons, we could be creating a very hazardous ' condition as it relates to a fire on the property in the event the single drive apron was blocked, the fire equipment could not enter the center. ' Any form of restriction or ingress and egress, we would consider major inverse condemnation. You can be assured that our partnership would not take a passive role and we would work at actively defeating any channelization plan that would eliminate one of the two driveway ' aprons serving our project. Unless we hear to the contrary, we will assume that this correspondence will serve notice that ' we expect the City to make no modifications as it relates to ingress and egress to our project. If our position is not clearly stated in this correspondence, we would be happy to meet with you in our offices at a time convenience for all of us. ' In the event there is any future correspondence relating to this issue, please forward duplicate information to our property management company: Attention Melinda Powell at AMC ' Management, 1303 Avocado Avenue, Suite 260, Newport Beach, California 92660. Yours very truly, Howard B. Jon s ' General Partner Edinger Associates HBJ:mm Enclosure 1 1 ORANGE COUNTY ' TRANSPORTATION ' AUTHORITY ' July 10, 1991 BOARD OF DIRECTORS i Mr. A.A. Folaron Roger R.Stanton Public Works Department ' Chairman City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Yce-Chairman Irvi Huntington Beach, CA 92648 an , Richard B.Edgar Dear Mr. Folaron Director Gary L.Hausdorler Director SUBJECT: EDINGER CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS (CC-737) William D.Mahoney Director We have reviewed this project and have the following Dana Reed I comments: Director Thomas F.Riley • OCTD currently provides service on Edinger within the Director , project limits as shown on the attached route maps and Don R.Roth ' schedules. There are several existing bus stops Director located in the project area at: ' Bob W Director I i.ecror — Westbound Edinger/farside Beach Boulevard. - Westbound Edinger/farside Sher Lane. Harriett M.Wieder Director - Westbound Edinger/at entrance to Montgomery Ward. ' _ Eastbound Edinger/farside Gothard Street. Dan Young Diector ! Eastbound Edinger/at entrance to Citibank. i - Eastbound Edinger/farside Sher Lane. Russel 0,Lightcap - Eastbound Edinger/nearside Parkside Lane. Govemors Ex-OBcio Member • According to Dan Gates, Senior Operations Supervisor, the Stops and Zones Staff concurs with the placement ' of the turnouts. Please see enclosed copy of his AFFILIATED AGENCIES letter for further information. Orange Counry Transit District • In order to minimize the delay r to our buses and to ' Transi I avoid patron confusion during the construction period, Local Transportation ; we would appreciate coordination of the construction Authority 1period with our Bus Operations staff. Please contact ' ServiceAuthortylor the following staff person approximately two weeks Freeway Emergencies prior to beginning construction, to coordinate access Consolidated Transportation to bus stops and bus vehicle movements through the ' Service Agency I project area: Congestion Management Agency I Detour Coordinator iDivision 04 Bus Operations ' Orange County Transit District P.O. Box 3005 Garden Grove, CA 92642 ' (714) 638-9000, extension 4584 ' 1055 North Main Street,Suite 516/Santa Ana/California 92701/(714)541-7850/Fax(714)541-7843 Mr. A. A. Folaron July 10, 1991 Page 2 We appreciate the- opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions, please call me or Bill Chandler at ' (714) 541-7850, extension 5821. Sincerely, Michael C. Betts ' Planning Manager/Environmental Coordinator ' Attachment:Route maps and schedules for OCTD Route 70. Letter from Dan Gates, OCTD Stops and Zones. cc: Detour Coordinator, OCTD Division 04 14 Z- 111 3 -z 320 1CW Avenue N.E. ' Suite 406 ,Belle ue.A 98W4 July 9 , 1991 FAX 206/455-4158 RECEIVED Mr . Tom Andrusky Department of Economic Development JUL 1 61991 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main StreetDEPARTMENT Huntington Beach , California 92648 ECONOMIC MEW; ' Dear Tom: We are in receipt of the proposed changes to Edinger Avenue. ' Rather than critique the entire proposal , I would rather reflect on the area .concerning our property. Although the .changes in access adversely impact us , I can understand the reasons for the city' s needs to do so. We , assuming other conditions can be appropriately worked out, would be willing to live with the changes in access. The main problem that we have is in the front area of our property . We count the loss of 20 parking spaces in the area affected . Also, it is unclear from the presentation whether one can turn left immediately upon entering the property , or if one must drive all the way into the property . Can you exit the Mercury property through ours near Edinger? You see the. new lines on the aerial photo ^ontradict each other. It would appear that if the city were to reconfigure the lanes of parking in order to allow parking on both sides of the Edinger ' curb-cut entry , that instead of loosing 20 parking spaces we would be able to pick up 6 parking spaces . I believe that by taking advantage of handicap parking and shifting the aisles to ' the west , this particular plan could be accommodated . Rather than attempt to draw it out to scale , I have done a rough tracing showing what I believe might be workable . In any event, the loss of 20 spaces in front of our major tenant appears unworkable to us. I strongly hope some reconfiguration can be done. I look forward to hearing from you . Sin rely , Ror Sher - RS:cw 11ta0708 Enclosure ' cc: Al Strand Sandy King ' Merritt Sher ow We create excitement in retail! 1 �vjv nor 1 , M 1 1 1 ( � 1 I 3c —F � l 1 iVN"A 18593 Main Street 1 4'2�- It l — ✓2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' 714/841-0036 FAX: 714/843-5776 �' July 5 , 1991 ' Mr . Thomas Andrusky Redevelopment Project Manager City of Huntington Beach P . O . Box 190 ' Huntington Beach , CA 92648 ' Re : Preliminary Plan Edinger Corridor ' Dear Tom: Our company is presently reviewing the details of the City ' s preliminary plan for the Edinger Corridor . Because ' we believe this proposal is unfair to our Sher Lane property in certain respects , it is our intention to pro- test these issues . Although no specific deadline was given at the meeting , our remarks will be submitted for your ' consideration within two weeks . ' Sincerely , 7 ' Sandy King Property Manager Terranomics ' sl c . c . Ron Sher r E C E ' V E D REDEVELOPMCN1'DEPT. jo ") r I42 A 1 3+ 14-2 -11I -- Z7 r MERCURY FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION A receivership of RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION R July 1, 1991 ECE, vED ' REDEVELOP,,"ENT DEFT.Tom Andrusky Department of Economic Development 2000 Main Street rHuntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Andrusky: ' Thank you for including us in your meeting to discuss the preliminary precise plan for Edinger Avenue . As discussed in the meeting these improvements will enhance the traffic flow and appearance along Edinger Avenue. It should help make the access to businesses along the south side of Edin- ger easier and the intersection of Edinger and Beach Boule- vard more bearable as well as other intersections to the west. ' There are two things that concern us at Mercury: 1 . The increase in the parking area landscaping will reduce the number of available parking ' spaces on Mercury' s site. 2 . Who will maintain the landscaped parking r . areas. Of foremost concern to Mercury and the RTC is the loss of ' parking which will leave the buildings short of parking required by zoning. We request that the city give a vari- ance to allow for the reduced parking. r We believe that a special assessment district should be set up to provide for the addition of the landscaping and main- tenance. The special district would provide the Edinger corridor with homogeneity and should enhance marketability. If each owner is required to plant and maintain the parking landscape areas within their boundary, the consistency could be lost and maintenance could be good or bad by each owner. r Sincerely, Ge ld Mosher Michelle Butler, SRPA sset Resolution Coordinator Chief Appraiser l �NDYQ�4 �E�eE 7812 EDINGER AVENUE • P.O. BOX 1010 • HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92647.3797 • (714) 842.9333 1 P, LAW OFFICES 1 PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2603 MAIN STREET ANGELO J. PALMIERI' BRUCE W. DANNEMEYER EAST TOWER - SUITE 1300 P. O. BOX 19712 ROBERT F.WALORON' CYNTHIA M. WOLCOTT IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714-6226 IRVINE, CA 92713-9% AIAN H.WIENC R' JOEL P. KEW ROBERT C. IHRKE' MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO (7141 BSI-9400 JAMES E. W'LHELM' NORMAN J. RODICH WRITER'S DIRECT 1 DENNIS G. TYLER• LORI K. DAVIES - DIAL NUMBER MICHAEL J. GREENE* GARY C.WEISBERG C G DRANK C. ROTHROCK' KEITH A. LAUFER (7 14) 8 51-7 2 6 Jr DENNIS W.PARRGHA' MICHAEL H. LEIFER CHARDAVID D PARR' MICHELE D. MURPHY CHARLES M. KANTER• TELECOPIER (714) BSI- GEORGE J.WALL ' SCOTT R. CARPENTER June 27, 1991 L. RICHARD RAWLS RICHARD A. SALUS 1714) 851-1 PATRICK A. HENNESSEY DOUGLAS M. STEVENS 1714) 757- • DON FISHER D. SUSAN WIENS 17141 BS1- GREGORY N.WEILER RONALD M. COLE ' WARREN A. WILLIAMS ROLAND P. REYNOLDS JOHN R.'LISTER CYNTHIA B. PAULSEN ELINOR J. VOTAW REFER TO FILE NO f .PROFIGSIONA:COR.ORATION 0 7 2 4 2-0 0 0 OF COUNSEL NON.TMOMAS J.UMBERG 1 MEMBER OF TtE CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY Mr. Thomas Andrusky City of Huntington Beach 4 Economic Development 2000 Main St. i P.O. Box 190 I Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Freeway Industrial Park 1 I Dear Mr. Andrusky 1 We represent Freeway Industrial Park ("Freeway") . Free- way is the fee owner of the properties located on Edinger Avenue, immediately east of Gothard Street, leased to Unocal and Levitz on ' the north side of Edinger and to Beds For Kids, Eastman West and Ortho Mattress ("Ortho/Eastman") and Rosalynn' s Restaurant on the south side of Edinger. These locations will be affected by the proposed street widening of Edinger Avenue. 1 , E On the north side of Edinger Avenue an 11 foot strip of land will be taken from the Levitz and Unocal sites for street 1 widening; in addition, one of the two entrances to the Unocal site is proposed to be eliminated (the entrance closest to Gothard Street) . On the- south side of Edinger Avenue, an additional 8 foot strip will be taken in front of the Ortho/Eastman and Rosalynn locations for a bus turnout; furthermore, the entrance in front of the Ortho/Eastman will be eliminated. An additional left turn lane would be added westbound on Edinger to southbound Gothard Street, thereby increasing the total number of left turn lanes at that location to two. At the present 1 time "U" turns are not permitted westbound to eastbound on Edinger at Gothard. In addition, there presently is no cutout in the mar.iokiaa on Edinger to enable westbound traffic to make a left turn �-►e tan 1 f:\corp\516\cor\freeuayA03 ' PALMIERI.TYI.ER,WIENER,WILnELM&WAI.DRON Mr. Thomas Andrusky June 27, 1991 Page 2 into Rosalynn's Restaurant location and apparently none is proposed with the new plan. Freeway respectfully requests that the City consider the following in connection with this project: ' 1. Westbound traffic on Edinger presently has no ability to easily enter into Rosalynn's Restaurant and it does not appear this situation will he remedied with the proposed plan. "U" turns at Gothard presently are illegal. Many times people who are ' trying to get to Rosalynn's attempt to make a "U" turn only to be ticketed by the police. The operators of Rosalynn' s feel that their business suffers greatly because of the inability of west- bound traffic to easily enter the premises and as a result poten- tial customers select other restaurants. Therefore, it is respect- fully requested -that either (i) the new left-hand left-turn lane ' from westbound Edinger to southbound Gothard Street be permitted to make a "U" turn; or (ii) a cut be made in the meridian on Edinger in front of Rosalynn's to permit westbound traffic along Edinger to make a left-turn directly into Rosalynn' s. 2. The entry from Edinger into the Ortho/Eastman location not be eliminated. If it is, it does not appear that there will be any other entry to the front of this property from Edinger. It would appear from the City' s plans that this would result in the loss of use of several parking spaces in front of tthis location. 3 . The entry into the Unocal location not be elimi- nated. Freeway believes that the elimination of one of the two ' entries will greatly reduce the desirability of this location as a service station site. ' Freeway is also interested in knowing the compensation the City intends to pay for the taking of property at these locations. ' f:\corp\516\cor\freeway,L03 PAI,MIERI,TYLER,WIENER,WILHELM&WALDRO\ Mr. Thomas Andrusky June 27, 1991 ' Page 3 ' I would appreciate a response to the foregoing at your earliest convenience. Thank you. ' Very truly yours, Robert C. Ihrke ' RCI:saw cc: Mr. Anthony A. Folaron Mr George Trotter ilk)&F-0 ?�Z�Y'e - ts--�E�rs f:\corp\516\cor\freeway.L03 x _ City of Huntington Beach ft rrr•f�it ✓ v * 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Office of the Director 536-5582 Economic Development 536-5542 May 21, 1991 2-0 ' To: Property Owners Located on Edinger Avenue from Gothard Avenue to Beach Boulevard Frara: Economic Development and Public Works Departments Su m2c: : Public Workshop to Discuss Preliminary Precise Plan of Edinger Avenue from ' Gothard Avenue to Beach Boulevard 1 D tie: Thursday, June 20, 1991 Time: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Place: Huntington Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Lower Level Room B-7 i rFor information call - Economic Development (714) 536-5582 - Tom Andrusky. The schedule is as follows: 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. - Property owners northside of Edinger Avenue from the _ Southern Pacific Railroad to Beach Boulevard coF`eS ' 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. - Property owners on the southside of Edinger from 14 Southern Pacific Railroad to Beach Boulevard '. 10.30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - Property owners on the north and southside of Edinger t J from Gothard Avenue to the Southern Pacific Railroad ' Please R.S.V.P. by Friday, June 14, 1991 to (714) 536-5582. TA:jar t