Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Precise Plan Street Alignment 73-1 - Redondo Circle - Garfie
F t i REQUESY. FOR`'CI`fiY =C�U�I+�iL CTIC�N .. 1.•. :}. Date February ' 23,:: 1983 s , 5ubmitt�d .o. Honorable Mayor and City Council Aryao�k Y *r Submitted by:. ' Charles W. Thompson, City Administra o CO Prewid by: 4ames: W. Palin, Director, Development Se ice x Subject: SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE GARFIELD -- GOLDENWEST AREA crr�•Ct�: Stetrement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachrt�nt3: STATEMENT• OF ISSUE: In 1981, the City Council directed staff, by resolution, to prepare a specific plan for the Garfield - Goldenwest area. Staff has re-- evaluated the need for a detailed specific plan for :his area and ". has determined that such a plan would be premature at this time. ` r PLANNING COM 41SSION ACTION 'ON FEBRUARY 15, 1983: ON MOTION BY LMNGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAI'.ANGIRI ITEM A-21 SPECIFIC .;.. . PLAN FOR THE GARFIELD -- GOLDENWEST AREA - RECUMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL I . _'. POSTPONEMENT OF STAFF WORK ON THE PLAN, WAS APPROVED BY THE rOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Winchell, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Nune ABSENT: Higginn, Schumacher ABSTAIN: Erskine RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Ccmmissicn and staff recommend that the City Council direct staff to postpone work on a specific plan for the Garfield Goldenwest Area until appropriate planning issues are resolved. ANALYSIS: On December 7, 1981 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5053 (in conjunction with Land Use Element Amendment No. 87--1) which stated, r' among other things, that "The. existing Medium- Density Residential desie.•raatxon on .tire 9 7 . 0 acre urea bounclecl by Goldenvest Street:, Garfield Y Avenue, Huntington Street and Clay Avenue be retained and that. staff ,_ . . be directed to prepare a specific plan fox said area" . The intent of the specific plan was toc'.elineate appropriate uses for the area ari ! y *Y ,4yi �r Sz.�fs�Y.raa.w�•.�- s+„ s•,_.,.,k..,� ;x <., `"` ` ,.. ... ,.., ._ �. ,. .. ,, ______...�t '-- `__ ''•-rl s RCA ` Ma kchi 7, '1903 Page 2 a; block by block basis. while addressing.` the issues .of. compatibility'.with . existin oU, o erations . g p , consolidation of parcels, access .•and: other: concerns: 'Staff indicated that work:.on the specific plan could `begin as ,soon, as p evious 'planning,. ,commitments had been completed .including r � r the Downtown andEllis - Goldenwest Specific Plans. . Staff has ,re-evaluated the need for a , detailed: specific plan for the 1 Garfield -,- Goldenwest area and .has determined that such .a 'plan wouln '-be premature at this time. There are a 'number 'of: unresolved issues, that, may have an impact on the Garfield - Goldenwest area which should be resolved before work on specific development standards is under- taken. The major issues are as follows : 1. The future alignment of Gothard Street south of Ellis Avenue has - not been finalized and may have a substantial impact on circ►ilation and land use in the Garfield -- Goldenweat area. Staff is currently considering alternative alignments for Gothard Street and will ! = bring these alternatives to the Planning Commission during the next amendment to the Circulation Plan of ,Arterial Streets and r ; Highways. 2. The City is considering including the eastern portion of the Garfield - Goldenwest area into a G_trara Corridor Redevelopment Project Area for which a redevelopment plan would be prepar,2d. ! 3. The City Council recently approved a redesignation anO rezoning of a portion of the site to Industrial to accommodate a request by the Cambro Manufacturing Plant to expand their operations: a wo uld uld o d for s d st a portion.specific lan o n t be needed r this in u. ..i 1 t� n. P P 4. The property owners in the Garfield - Goldenwest area have not indicated that they want the City to prepare a specific plan for their properties . In short., there are a number of f,ignificant unresolved issues that may have an in act can the Garfield - C; P oldenwest area which should he re- solved before additional planning efforts arc infleitakcrs for the aret. . Staff will continue to monitor any City actiona that may impact future ' + land ur-es in the Garfield - Goldenwest area and to evaluate what Special planning efforts by theCity if any, will be neceBsai-y to Insure c.onicaatibl.e and coordinated d, relopment . FUNDING SOURCS: Notapplicable ,,;. ..:. ALTERN'ATIVE ACTIONS: 14 .. Direct staff ta - begin work irirediately on a specifics plan for the j Garfield -- Goldenwest area. ATTACt;MENTS.# �a y 1. . Map of Garfield - Goldenwest Area 2: Fesolution No. 505 ARIZ t yt WAl� , 1 } V' VAS CARFIELD-GOLDENWEST AREA I r , Floutt 7 e } e z rS F r SF Ira buntington beach planning department � t t ^4 ' RESOLUTION NO. 5053 fry A RE-SOLUTZOR 'OF TNE.`.C1TY COUNCIL OI~. THC CITY ,OF l(UNTINGTON';BEACH+'ADOPTING- LAND USE ELEN,ENT AMEND r1EN7; .NO. 81-2 TO 'TtiE CITY'S 'GENERAL":PLAN WHEREAS, ` the 'City Council o€ the City of Huntington IIeacn desires to 'update and refine the General Plan •xn steeping with > changing communi ty needs and objectives; and A public hearing on adoption of Lana Use Element Amendment r,r No. 81-2 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission on November 3, 19810 and approved for recommendaLion to the City s.. .. Council.; and Thereafter, the City Council , after givitlg notice a re- scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least one public hearing to consider said Land Use Eleltaent No. 81-2: and At naid hearing before the City Council all persons desiring to lie heard on said artendnent were heard , 110W, I'll ERE FOnt BE IT 1WSnLVE.i) by the City Council of the City of Huntington: neach, purtoiant. Lo t)r-ravi_;iorls of I'itale 7 , Chapter :3, ArLicle G of thc CalJ fcrnia c;overiwwnt Cod+ , cor%moricirlcr '°- wi:-h necLion 6535U, t hac. Land Use F.;1emvnt A,,nond:nc.rlt: No. 81-2 to ttic• General Flan, cUnr; !; t-irlq (A tier: fc}; ,IU�:�.r1<t Chi-111ge's it- 11crcyb ac3o IL L,d; l . `I'ttat �Z medium-h1 11� !+_°r1.;.z t �• rc .;,.ic,rlt.it�l c:.lt�rc Ur} per- ini tt-Ally III) to 25 dwell inq ttr+ i t.:F pt_i, tit,oi;w acro be adtivd to t;ho Land tlr;s> Ule n,r;,nt an t•.!s?.t°ded in L,,n l 33t.t- 4%1.'1c ::1crat Ajrjvnc; )L-nt: No . Etl -1 . 2 . :fiat~ ref ercrrxe t.o Ow zd 14 G0 Cl* i Le-1•i;.1 in r iqure 3-15 ol' the Gerv,,rzl l I'ZIlk flu(- be I^lade -.01on I:t 1k;2 ryy :1 { 1Itt31i1i) of Cont;I.:;tl:.I3fiy in the ci.tyl :; c:oa:;tol l � :3 . That t`0.1 ,requt,st i.lt:vis in a t".t't+ zaJ Plat, lurFettelmvnt btu t`Ot'wat•tivd to City Council #cfL• r rrvlow 11y 01c. ` and t W t ttic rosvl.ut, .0rl for'l+'+.7t1`ded tO C:i Llrl Lo .'>Slt' i f by tblict �'�i3Flrllti� f� cC1SIt1`►iS.ti.d,+l:.lr) plainly" sets apart- t h :it itC:m�; reco.mr;zetided for approval y \�'�.w'PGirl /, t ,.. • . ,z. ' .... ..,.. . ., a,... ... _ .... ........ ... .. ate... ... . des'Residential' �71 That th'e:,�existing ,Med -deiiisity,� un. Lion on.. th6-:97:O., acre-.area''.,,'boUiided b aold6p,.46ist treet, S Y, r .#Avenue n to ,"and C16y. Avenue be` retained.;�and that ' . a V itirf,�be dir6dted to!-*prepare - a specifi c-plan :forsaid',area. :, That acres-:located ated on Cbmmddore Circle between: Hunti Delaware ngton 4nd'Z 1 Streets be 'redesignated :from''filed ium ,,to Medium'high ,DensitRes ident ial w ith the : condition that prior.r to"": rt apP roval . p ' and/ n:of az tentative, mi or, conditio Use.','permit To' ','.the :. site, p, n aeptab e to r the devel'oper must a la cc of,' displaced, familids cityaddressing 'the :relocatio'n That' one acre on the 'northeast corner of Newm f Avenu ar Tb. e and Van Buren Street.'be redesignated from Medium-density Resldentlal to Off ice Prof essional. 7. , ' That 9. 8 acres located east of Beach Boulevard 18022 feet south of Atlanta Avenue be resdesignated from General Commercial i. and 14edium-density Residential to High-density Residential with a maximum of 290 units permitted on the site; that any develop- ment on the site be a gated community; and that the provision or a 1"rantage road arallel to Beach Boulevavd be addruased In any p site plan for the area. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City o. Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held an the 7th day of December, 1981 . Mayor A?rEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 00, A!� City Clerk City Attorney RRi 2, Y7 qtg 40 1'all 7-1, REVIEWW�rAIM-APPROV �j" • t- in -Do, en CitV,* AdM istrator,. . .' irector'of" .:,Service 3 . qP- 's. Of,'CALIFORNIA G 1 TY OF If LW I NGTON B EkCit L ALICIkM -WENWORTH the duly elected, quaAlf ied :City`! ex-o c n 1 4- , ' M Io`C Clerk 'ifie" Clerk,'',i)V i &4,ci.ty of Alu iinjt6n B.eac,h"' and z . i t Ktl ,'-�Clty;council 'of said Cyp "do- hereby.-cidrtif :that ,the :whole''number, of: I ., �b-me ers of. the City. Council.,of ,the city"of: Ifun''iingtdn',ftacih _is: 'a even- y, ',-,. that the 'foregoing reeolution �ias `piissed. and' adopted b the affirMative'' vote � f v morie`. thAn,a -nisjo' Lty of the. members.'�of, said.'D a r City Council at a regular meeting thereoUbeld bn .the 7th . day of December by the following vote: . ber : 19 81 AYES: Councilmen: Ma 'elly MacAllister, Thomas , Pattinsun, Finley, Raile),, Mandic., 1, NOES Councilmen: NGne ABSENT: Counc I lrwn: None City Clerk and ex-off iclo Cl(�,r'-, of the Citv Council of the 0t of Huntingiorl Beach, Califor.:i, ,,J'.A" }E �A k 'rL - k HE STt i ' �T:Y CC", L I "ACTION ' SOMAttsd" by- rlo G. , Belsito-*`- DepartmentCity Adminis*tiition MR yii E uly I ick p'Make' rial Attached 24' t_l u Date Pkpirid' 9' 79 5 S a ;Specific reet AliArnent of Redondo 76iic16 �P lan -73 City Administrators Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL e Approve as recommended (2 19AW- A^ LA 1-7 C IT L r.R=X Statp;nent of 1swe, Recomriendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, ✓ Statement of Issue: Dan Baker, Attorney at Law, spoke at the Council Meeting of July 16 1979 - requesting relief for his client, Mr. Lazeo Kovacs , from the "burden do placed. by the present proposed alignment of Redon Circle. " 'Recoffunendation: Pay to P.ichard E. Jimenez , developer, a total lump sum settlement in the amount of $25,000. Analysis Please see the attached memorandum from Michael Zambory, Director of Public Works. Funding -Source. Gas Tax Funds 4. N Wy . _V tow N 'y �jx 6,4 %�; ,"%�J"-!A 17 IN Mit i, ER'DEPARI ICAT OW'"it _t V VENT' COM -W, kr 44 Bud lichee Zambory.. Fiom 0 B61ii t street'AU4hme- ntf Red ondo July 0 979 Sublect Date Circle-Specific " Plan 73 1 , d h L' 'e6tor-:-v e Council requested e-�D r At their* meeting- July 16 thi,�City..Co q.ill e Development" ' .'Ser�Viees tcj' meet�' Pi�bli,6 .'Works!t and . the ' Director.'of; Rh,ard 'E.' :j en.ez* ';'developer; _in order-, o res 1V e6.:,t' he claim of exc.e involving-*an , industrial d6vei6omint,�on thrc' �iouth-�side lof Talbert "X,':Avenue� appr6ximAtely 1.2.30 ,..feet wie' st-,of= Beach Blvd. At,: V 9: 0A4M. Thursday, July 19 , the the of Public Works'-.o a* and: of Development Services met with Mr. Richard .E. Jirienez t e . excessive costs claimed by Mr. Jimenez at the Council meeting July, 16 - aftd* expressed `alto -as ' expre ' ed in a letter addressed to the City Council from. Dan N..,., k " e .Ba er, attorney -at law, dated June 14 ' 1979 representing the owner of t e::*property Mr. Lazlo Kovacs , A thorough review was :made of the history ' ' - of .the project and of the claimed additional costs. It appearsthat the excessive costs' was brought about to some extent byerror of City ' employees, by existing ordinance requirements, and by interpretation of older policies of a City Administrator and City Council no long r holding ; such Positions* Following 1 1/2 hours of discussionj debate and analysis, it was agreed that a recommendation be made to the City Council to pay to Richard E. Jimenez, developer, a : total lump sum settlement In the amount. of $25 #000, based upon the following: MA 1) 34, 500 sq. ft.. of dedicated public right of way in excess of the half street section normally requl.&-ad. . . . . . . . $12gOOO ._(2) Two storm drain catch basins and required concrete pipe. . . . OtOOO Earth grading beyond the centerline of dedicated half SS street. . . . . . . . . . . a 0 0 lk 11000 (A) Excessive architect' s fee due to Pre.c i se Precise Plan of - street Alignment being made known after completion of 2fOOO _ architect' s plan. ♦ • • • • f • 5) :EXcessive engineering required because of Precise Plan of Stre.et. Alignment being made known after in .itial design of Project was complet.e. . . . . . . . . . . $ 2* 000 ji Grand - Jimenez had itemized . a listing ,of,:items- In the amount of ' $50,000 L fjom �bi s " ew* poInt Were 1cgitf ate claims against the Ci- ty, However, .•-some of the items involved .aninterpretation of a, memorandum r 76 frOm Q Da .vid D Rowlands �th City C6 Ci uncil (to . ! g ,�ihdOi;trial:�di-Veloo-i6ent.,� In that memo t o' gardin Ki Rowlands 4 . -, i dustrial-. eve opers through .,prov'b"the City, ida,,assis ance to n ity, through.. Gai�,.Tax t� b having the 1 �ductio of.:,Of I pro eme-A ;,�cos s ,. y 9 ryt y')» 1MQm0 ao: Bud ' Belsito #June 20 1979 expenditure construct. streets, sanitary sewers, storm drains and..water, ; mains which normally :would be '`constructed by. the developers themselves. kf°? The policy,.was`�Applied: in `.varying degrees. for a .short time following its adoption. .However, with-,Prop 13 and the general feeling o'E--the public r,} l' expenditures, ' it' would appear reasonable for thetoward governmenta ~I -.: present City Council to reconsider this policy at this time'. tF It is recommended by the Director of Public Works and the .Director z . of development -Services that the City Council accept the negotiated k,A r' _`$25,'000' 'settlement as being fair and equitable, and that this amount be made payable to Richard F. Jimenez upon final acceptance of all offsite ' f improvements involving this development. It is further recommended that 1 the City Council authorize payment of the $25, 000 from the City's Gas Tax Fund '44 -1/m r i Yc ael Z2 qr Director o /� tic s 7y Attach. t. I V E y k JUL 2, 0 19 9 �J L r CM 4F H�lf{T NGTOH BEACH F YY 141h�S1R�►�t`V Mr y x t ik Jf f { ClUT a:Y ; J H unTlart,,,T Ba � � H tix e, tt�", yf 'F•) iYr• '�"..: - t Fr. •y._; ,54-.r.c.•t• ..e+" ^,5:. .'.n•}.a. i. .t Ir. •• J 1�.�` i DEPARTMENT,OF DEVELOPlIu1ENT' E 1lICE . �� :" ,. >�x Y A Bi llLDt';�.DI1ilS4CM t7141 b3�S3741 {� -PLANNING DIYIS M 1714)53WW1 77 * P.Q Box 194 WUNTIINt3TON BEACH,CALII�OAINIA l�Mt t > Honorable Mayor. and :ii ty Council. a: at :ATTN: Floyd G. -Be sit City Adm.iYistrator t` =FROM`: :, 'James W.'. •Palin,� Department of Development Services -DATE: July :12, 1979 SUBJECT: " 'ATTACHED •LETTER DATED JUNE '14, 1979 IN. RE: , STREET ALIGNMENT OF. REDONDO CIRCLE; -- SPECIFIC ` PLA2i 73-1 Attached herewith in a letter from Dan N. Baker, Attorney at Law, y • in which he has requested to address the City Council on the matter . of street improvements along his client' s westerly property line ;at Talbert Avenue and Redondo Circle. Events as set . forth by Mr, Baker in his letter are correct. This department has no explanation of why the planned alignment for Redondo Circle was missed .an the originallya roved AR 78-59. PP r A 4 ��;•,- Mr. Kovacs,, the property owner, subsequently revised his pan and # . resubtritted it for approval , and at that - time it was discovered that the original approval had not taken the street alignment into con- ' 'sidc�ration. There has been mach Bela because of this prior o��er- Y sight ands as stated by Mr. Baker, the majority of the street is required to be dedicated from his client's property. The street alignment and improvement will directly benefit the City' s holdings to the south of the subject industrial development. Because of that beneficial effect to the value of the City-owned property-,, as well as the delay and expense caused by the prior oversight and the majority dedication required from this property, the Department of Development Services in our reviews with the representatives of the applicant has recommended that he pursue with the City Council some possible relief .from the street improvements as currently required . (Asa side issue, when it was determined that the street was required to be dedicated and improved additional grading was necessary upon Mr.. Kovacs ' property. because of street grade. The surplus earth from this grading has been given to the City to partially Mitigate the depression caused through the construction of the 'Taylor Street park =`5 site . ) r . . Additional revisions have been necessary on Mr. Kovac;s' site plan { because of the dedication of approximately ' 35 .feet of the 45-foot ' -°fndustrial street section from his property. These revisions were ii Ce a: ry tt} taCCt?FI".filo{3atG the required public street dedication . as well ae .'onaite circulation,. buildinc setbacks, and landsca-ing. Also, 3 > `µ {,» sit reet- improvements had been submitted to the Department of Public ;r , :. torks, and plan checked for the original entitlement; these improvements had not in the necessary design . for the intersection. of Redondo Circle and Talbert. Avenue. In a discussion with the applicant .. � �r��::F�,.lf t,.::e "r...,c..n n ,.. ..i.r': + . ..o.., 9 t... t ...? ...., 1.. :. e ,.. ... .. .,n,+ . _.,• .a....... ., __ ,.,�_. .�...�.....si..a.K,t•�eBi1lr•ri�t — — r.,,,F-� s) Page 2 ,we w'ezeT`infotme`d that all•:of these, items (i.e.;, streets'dedication > 'arid .i.mprovernents, .•revised Street irtiprvvement plans'•, additional ;grading and .delay . 7,.have •'cost; more;, than-:$4 o 000 our meeti7gs';wi:tYi rrthe Rproperty, owner :subse uent to his.'filin hid revised ' lens' - he;�iri 'uired { . ., . q 4. p ► r. 9 I� .whether the City, would..•pay ,for .any,',of his additional 'costs required,,ati; '. for :'ultimate development. . ., At ' that time;, the .staff irifo'rmed 'Mr. . ,' Covacs I�t 'of the policy previously -adopt d by the',.City: Council `to assi:§t where= f ever feasible in offsite improvements for industrial and com a-icial 'development within the City. Pursuant to that policy, Mr. Baker' s letter is before you for review: , ?: We do .'not feel that the., 'City Council' s concurrence 'for participation for a portion 'of the offsite improvements for ,this development would. .. I. be .setting a pre.,,edent, as'-:the ,Council on a number: cif. occasions .has agreed to street improvements where •dedication has been granted, by, a, property owner. The exi.stinq! 'portion of Redonda Circle waH. constructed with participation by the City, as well as a number of additional ' streets where. . Public Works could arrange for street improvements in exchange for dedication of right-.of-way. ' RECONtMENDATSON In view of the above✓-mentioned facts, the Department of Development. Services recommends that the City Council pursue one of the following suggested actions : l. . Approve in concept the participation with the property owner for partial reimbursement fog the street improvements as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on Administrative .,Review 79--5i and request the 'developer to submit to the .Department of Public Works calculations on quantities and costs for these additional" street improvements. 2 ., Approve in concept the costs -of street improvements for the 'i north/south leg of Redondo Circle as ' required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on AdministrativeReview 79-57. and require that Ij the developer submit to the Department of 'Public Works-'auantities f and costs for such construction and grant reimbursement in exchange for the street right-of-way dedication. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reject the request to participate in the additions,:l, street 'improvements as required on this development pursuant 'to the Poaird of Zoning ` Adjustments ' action on Administrative. .Review Ns.-, 7!)--57 . Should the Council need additional information, the staff will be pre pared to 'discuss this item with you at your July 16 , 1979 meeting. . Reppectfully s itted ' - XD4e mes W. . Palin, . Director : r�artment "of Development Services 0 P:d f ,' , Attached: better dated June 14 , 1979 ,i ' DnW !v:' BAr� H ' ATTOIINLY'At LAW .. i j7•l.,,? ../;//���1� G]w^�V4� f t t SiltTC.400r tCATNCROV BUILDINGP11 r�:; 1', y y I+oO /LdiiTN N�RQOR f►4tJLCVAnf9 v h ` Pu4LCRTON.CWTORN1A 0263*. t11��tr ff .•i ".v4[rNOMC (71�� •Ntt�t _ �IU . . ' • ,;. A. June r 14 , 197 9 P. �T y (oil 06611''CA`92648 Honorsble:F City Council City �of: :Hunting ton . 'Beach , 2tOr 00 Main St. , Huntington' Beach, 'CA. '92648 `Attn IL:tloyd Helsito ' . City 'Administrator - Re: Proposed Street Alignment of Redoiido 'Circle 'Specific Plan 73-1 Dear Mr. Belsito The, undersigned represents tire Lazlo:. Kovacs, ' the owner: `o.f property . located en .the .'south. side of . Talbert Avenue, approximately.. 1230., feel• west of Beach Blvd.., in your City. The purpose of this letter is. to request a hearing before . the . City Council at' the earliest date possible. we, would seek, `at that *hearing , relief .from the. tremendous ,burden placed upon my client by the present proposed al�ignment 'of Redondo Circle. 'That alignmen t will parallel the western property; lin ie of. my client's :property - and take approximately 45 feet • from his `proper ty. .. It 'is my understanding that the "City Council has ar3vpted. a policy , whereby in -commercial and/or industrill areas ' of -the City, . assis4ance will be tendered '.to the property owner where off-site improvements' will work an extreme p hardshi `on 'the property owner , or -some dis ro- p ,' �' y . . p. portionate sharing of 'the burden is mandated among' 'adaoining property. ; owners. The factual events in this particular case certainly warrant r the City',s application 'of that policy, to ' this property owner:` As; background for your consideration I would offer the following : On the . 27th day of July, 1978 , a site• plan, AR .78 59, was approv;ed by the IIoard of Zoning Adjustment of your City whereby m * client t •� , � ' r' j DAN IV ' BAKER ATTanntY AY LAWn / •1►.. •� Y QL�vl� { t i SUIT[ aOOtCATN[11d♦ OUI 91NG 1_ 4400 14ORTH "OLP"00 SOMEVr•nO 1 MIL !gTON,(?A4irngMii► pzaas June 14 , 1979 P :O. � ,. { ^r� DY-1D0' t- Volt Go'' Y!,onokhble;,City. Council tri ty , of• .Hunting ton Beach ' .20Q0 Mein St'. Hunti.ngtan 'Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: ' Fl:oyd •.Belsito ; City`•Adrhinistrator Re: Proposed : Street- Alignment" of Redondo'-Circle t. '} Specific Plan 73--1 'Dear .14r. Belsito ` 'Ph,e undersigned represents E�;r. I.azlo Kovacs, the owner of-*property 16z1a,ted bn the south ride of Talbert Avenue, approximately. 1230-'feet west of� Beach Blvd. , in your City. The - p rpose of this- letter ' is to request a hearing,,before. the'. City Council at the earliest date possible. WE WouldI seek, at that ' hearing , relief from the. tremendous burde' e present proposed nt 'ofR dordopla6t:d upon m client• by th • .. Circle. That alignment will parallel the western property line of, my; client' s- property and take approximately 45 feet from his property..; it is ;my understanding that the City Council has adopted' a poli.ry of h i , assistance ' s r a areas the C mmercial 'and or• inciu t a. 1 whereb -in co / Y I y , will be tendered to the property owner where off--site •improvement's will work 'an extreme hardship on the property owner or some , dispxo- porti.anate sharing of the ' burde'n is mandated among adjoining property, _- owners The factual events in this particular. case certainly warrant. I the City" s application of that policy to this property owner. . 1'cs backgroi:nd for.. your consideration I would offer the "following: On the 27th .day of July, 1978 , a ; site' an, An 78 59 was��.approved . by` the hoard of Zoning Adjustment of your City 4.,rhereby my client t ,r _ _ _ 1 1 ly ;f!.+ i 1 •mot. A S +...HO Oia•,b�,e +CitJ '. `•; ' . !� June une '1 4 , '7.979 o,,Attn: rl 'd:,telsit iT 1 j�tJir L �=4,1 `= 1 7 Page`t 2 r' f ► •J t J }, would f �.. g J�onstruct . certaa.n industrld buildin s on his praperty;.pursuant to .,that,. plan,. .; No. notice of the requirements 0 Specific 'Plan 73--1` ' as :,revised :was :given to my, client':and but , far -,a `decision =to 'change contractors, :'&rmits would,'have ; been pulled and the .,project built. r A1,1`;with6ut 'any notice;'of `or' requirements for street improvements on. the proposed Redondo Circle. When the `owner made application in AR 79-57 to modify_ tYie. Site ' Plan in =preparation for actual construction, the City :for!:rthe first ' . .:,: time notified the owner 'that Specific.'Plan 73-�1 :would have -an, effect: on'-:his 'proposed •development. Subsequent facts reveal ' that statement to be '. the major:understatement of the year. J The proposed street will take approximately 3/� 'of. its w�.dth 'from niy -.client's prcperty and because that 'westerly property• is already developed only approximately ' 1 j9 of the `widtr. will 'come £rum that ;property- That ..fact alone is a major disproportion rig ot,:tthe . burden of improvement, in that obviously my ,client would be faced with upwards of 3/4 of the cost of- the street. :rr. Since at the time the westerly property was developed, no provision for ; the' street. was contemplated, the, westerly property •owner was not required 'to bond or guarantee for street improvements . ; In addition , our preliminary engineering: stu' dies indicate that the adjacent , property owner has constructed .a block wall . which : , encro6ches. on the City'.s proposed right of way and that the wall!,.s ` footing- a:re. as much as 3-1/2 feet higher than the t:)p .`of the proposed curb of ' the. west side of the street,` indicating An. Excessive change . in g=ade 'from the property as it now stands and the elevation' of the finished' street. Further, the City ' s Public Works Department has , indicated a need c; for storm dra�.nage facilities 'down this street but are 'unable at .r,;. . this 'time to provide the details of their projected needs or any - : specific. engineering requirements. :;.. My client 'is now in a position where` he` must proceed with all S -speed to develop or the project will become economically infeasible. ,We: have alread obtained a conditional exception' to deal with the encroachment problems created by the sudden awareness of .,the proposed street. I da request` from .you a. hearing before . the City Council at'L the ., Honorable .City Council Attn: Floyd 'Belsik, s�r�> -Page.,'3 � .• . . t • ai{I if',� 1 ,..: tit 4 r `•`r. ,I _'� itY' earli St:..possible,date: so 'that• w ,may plead.'our ''case to' that body and: somehow, ':overcome; the ;tremendous: problems "that':have now ara sen fn:sthe -patih 'o this profcct , Pease 'advise me at'your earliest. opportunitiy. ; Very "truly;-yours, 4 � DRN N. ` BI1K�R . DNBrpd cc: Lazlo Kovacs Richard B. Jimenez - .. James W.. Palin 4 j e •it 4' 7r Yak i[} t� a; 'l , ` .. ,,;t`. _-}.�.. y .. 1 t ' `1 •, ' 1 �,I 'I • I i ` ,�, ' • r7 � .!'.ri i�' t t� �{ r �: 5 t 1 Flo 'COUNCIL !.;,:ADMINISTRATOR 'COMMUNICATtaN r m►rlwGlOy MKM. t To ,11onorab'le Ma"yor acid t~iom . Ci'ty Administrator City' Coiinci 1. Membe.rs .... r Subject `GAS,; AX�, PROJUCT Qate April 23 , . 1976. . ( INDUSTRIAL' PARK) c*ons'truction on arterial highways in industrial .areas has been per f ` formed ir ,,the past by. the C ty ' s use {of. Gas ,rax Funds ,. A project :.,I recently; underway is on.'Gothard Street from Warner Avenue.1o'. Ellis Avenue co�hsisting of storm `drains , ' watcr mains , sanitary scwer5 and street wide' nin . Th'r. . total, cost 'of this pri�ject will amount to g Iapproximately $68'1 , 803 . 81 financed from Gas 'Tax Fund , Sewer .Fund , Water Fund , Drainage Fund and an, Economic development Adnxnistration ,. Grant of SI.75 , 000. Because . of the possibility of industrial . development . in - the Lusk } Inclust.r'ial Park, it 'has been suggested that the City AmmedIntcly - I)r,a- ceed° with ,a :project to complete the street work on Spring dale. Street , Graham Street , Bol sa Avenue and McFadden Avenue: ed j scent .. to.`the_ . vacant industrial. property. The cost would be approximately .S3�i8 ,97 and can be� financed with Gas Tax Funds . ,• .. This project will not jeopardize any project plan for the next 12. months . If this proposal ineets with the City Council ' s ,approval , ap&opr.in'te' j act ion would be to authors ze the Department of .11itbl is Works, to prepare the plans and specifications and to authorize advertising of bids R UONN'RNUAT I ON Approve the proposed Gas Tax Project in the industrial area and authoriie- the . D partmc�tt 'of .Public Works to prepare the . plans ' 'ana specifications and to authorize advertisement for bids . Respectfully ; submitted ,- David U. Rowlan s City Administrator s t a. t+ r +.� _ i 1 j { ,t e r � f +,` :+ -. i• }r' a s !+ i +... + ,�i{ { s' , f f:.,£. •.s tr [• rf`. t � . ' :CITY ' +�F : ��Il �'� T11'r! "�' R+I ' �A, 76'=56A .:. ,, CC3UNCIL ADMINISTH�►TO�i COMMUNICATION to Ilonornti lc 'I►f;�yor and From City Aimini'strat`or` :city Council Members Subject. 'GAS,` *AX [PROJECT ' D to Apra 1 29 , . 1976 (INDUSTRIAL PARK) This CA is n ` supplemerit to' CA 76- 56 which ..was deferred ' from the, April 2bth Council meeting. ' The Ci ty Couticil." }�zs on several 'occasions 'expressed ii tics re ' re staff i`• to 'work closely witli 'the owners and developers of commercial and ,. indus trial property in ort3c�' to establish a stronger tax base. Cooperation on the art o f the City may be atrorn 1 i sl�e'cl h • ex red i t j ous l >>'oce:�s 1 �t ' !' y y p j I y. 1. K . the plans through the various City departments and by reducing off-site. improvement costs such as streets , sanitary, sewers , storm Jrains ixnd ' water rnair;G which would `normally be bonze by thedeve lope rs : The .staff is currently reevaluating the procedures by which . plans ''cun ' ` be snore effectively: F�rocesscif and will be submitting tti.ng a �•eco�nmendation ` as apart of the rewrite of Division 9 (11lannirig and Zoning . • With' regard t.o 'off-site and other improvement costs , the City iiay be � . able to proviclr. assistanee tltirough . the installation of Puhlic Works improvements to actual development , thereby reducing the site 'prepar- ation costs . RECOW.IENDAT ION Ado P t this policy and authorize staff to 'procced accordingly . 4 Respect fill ly submictcd , David 1). Roa•la ds City Administrator gt tn On,. : a' x r1 O uni I 4. CALIFO N 1X9264M P.O. Box 190 • 0 "ICE 'OF .TIIE CITY.-ADAII NisTRATO R,:_. FF May 19 19 7 6 Aluntington Beach Industrial.,Park P. '0. Boo .2140 'Nt B ac ewpor e' 'h , California 92663 Attention: Da'tion: Mr. id � W- Ariss, .ice President v V Gentlemen: This letter is to serve as written confirmation of items of general agreement .as to areas of responsibility for "providing. L-itprovejne6ts . .on the property located north of McFadden Avenue between Springdale Street and Graham Street . This matter has been din6ussed - with the City: Council and they have concurred with 'this approach." Please refer .to a copy of the attached City Council Minutes. ,The .City Council ha'tt ',,reprioritized Gas Tax Projects to establish a - project on the af6remention'ed property. Said project will provide for the following : . 1. Engineeripq - The Project will. include preparation of 'plans' . to construct street improvements on:. Springdale' Street,, McFadde'n Avenue,, and Graham Street. 2. Street ImprovementsThe Project will provide for construction of all street improvements as required by the improvementt- plans for ..Springdale Street, McFadden Avenue , and Graham Streete' Sidewalks will not be included I as a : part of this -construction- on the east side of Graham and the north side. of I-IcFadden , :'but . will be worked out as a requirement development of the . property abutting the two streets . The City will "consider a . modification to the standard sidewa . requiremic-,nts.'arld/or a landscape belt in lieu of the sidewalk requiremen . 3 . Street Lights,s - 'The Project will include street lights on Springdale Street,'FMcFadden Avenuep and Graham Street. 4. :1-ledian Divider i improvements not ncIti&',* Installation of a . landscaped median divider .on Springdale Street and McFadden Avenue. The' City wi.1.1 riot require the 'developer. of. 'the adjacent parcel to',,in'stall this improvement:.Th !r.;,,eph*ne (714) S36-Skl 'P `2 age,: standard City :`stredt tkee ,rdquik,emen t 1 br 2 0,1' 156x -.t'rees`',Vli I not' bd.*in'cllJded' 'a's of. t h 6 Ga s :Tak"I ro)ec �:'bd t'.will "be"W(ork6d 'oil t as eve of-' the,,:d The dity.,.i4ill a ---'coh`d1Uop.:6f ,,d ' -lo'pment, Ajdcerit.�,.propert' 'der 61 :owing-t e s eincorporated' 'a s consi li,�. tree.ree re quirdihent '.to. be ."a�':part .of 66 ,la'n'd'scdp' e :requirement .of ir.jacent pioperty., "Huhtington..:Beach ,'1 -ril, are conce"ne Inso� ar. as storm f r rains d the , City 'of ' �KIndustrial 'reques Es.�that the tile Iiu'htingto' n- BeacPark constrict the h: system,,requi:storm drain red for the "develcipmen't of �41&.Faid'd' e'n"Menue. �and. Graham Street :. Since - this is14aster '-Planned; Project.,"."the. cost of''.the drainage faicility will be applied - a s credit -toward payment of drainaige,'feeis - T -� -he City will not require. ihstallcltion of a water line on Springdale. street'. 'the 'developer .of the pro'perty west 'of and ' cont. iguous !'to Springdale Stredt will be - permitted to ho"" t. tap" as necessary the J�existing 36" line in Springdale Street at., the time the ; pro ert y Is. develop.edi It will - be the responsibility,.'of the, .developer ,to, provide 'fire hydrants (approximately 4) :oh..Graham Street as required -by the ,. Fire Ddozirtment. .: There. is no requiirem' ent nor is there -a need f or the, Ilubtington 'Beach IndustrialPark to 'install an i'dentificatio'n, monum' ent ,or to 'provide'- .," a separate landscape axes at: the northwest corner of Springda1 e Street and McFadden Ave'A" be. to -identify the industrial park. . Huntington Beach Industrial Park will be responsible. for.` processing the various parcel maps , tentative parcel maps , prepara-;.-Aon of storm drain plans and installation of .master storm drains . ' Additioniallye Ifuntington Beach Industrial Park will bb responsible for all, fees' : and assessments normally charged by the City for industriAl 'development. It' should be clearly understood by all parties that the reprioritizing of the Gas Tax Project' to move the s project up higher on the. pri6rity list was done to enhance the desirability of this,: site for the Weiser Lock Company. Should the Weiser Lock transaction- with'. the Huntington . .Beach Industrial Park not be fulfilled , 'the .iniprovements outlined - herein ' wi.11be subject to further review which may .postpone , such, impr,'.*1irijments, The contents of this letter constitute a statement of applicable City policy and should not be construed as bestowing upon.'any person or organization any benefit or duty not otherwise provided by laW., Yours very truly, ........... Floyd Belsito Director of `Public W, rks 'Actii g' City Administrator Reviewed b iti Attorney chard Ifdii6w Director of . Pianning and IL 'Environmental : Res ' ources Revi� ewed by An.sl City, U lie y f,.l ��,�rf' jT�'.'f,{'.+''.. � +., .T F S •.if .r - +ti +,-y ^Y :`,}' '�' 1,,,,��„„x•,'., .Y. ! to Sr �' �'�1 r } 'T +ter• t ('•r�'i♦i ..4 ..'Ja 'L: wil�4;• l � ..#rt 3''.Z:(i !t .S yf �^•'•" J� r ,r ''• � � s s! �r "{t yr ies'?J) r t ! #. �., rY,f•,. •�.;'.�•� � t � � ��� 1�` c, B{�' d ~11ut1 cirY c'catt �,� �.. ..... i j r rtiuttet 1 Chiiii� i, t'sly'ibi f 1{lint lnytull beaclt" 'V wl i'.ti(Itl.t yt 4 'i � •; ,•','11R�+gr.`Mlyder„ •+ �:t.�llr't! ltvsregi+lat ., �.: ' I�tt�ttny at�tlw Cl•ty C�rtrit.tl �; Iti.. tty; (flluntin� :Mach'W ,otdt,t nt • {p0 M.11... J {'rNp�Ili S mc{ - Y' + _..1a1R�R11 616a•R/1Rf101011/10111�1gR111RY/IN 1�1r1�a•�1+.IRIRSA1RRRf RRIRIRI•R RIRR RRR1111'IIR1 ' Ti GAS'TA71_ VADJEa- I&DUST LKIL,xPAM tCA 76-56) ,AMD (CA '76-56A) `� f Nitta 'City +Cl-Crk preiinted a cowmunication,tram the City,Adaln' IW tot 'dated April' 11, 7 a h sc atweatnd n th+et. ha City lanlediat • with a- ra e•ct et to,, .. .. e a t:� . a • g. Y 1 •rocee Borg►! , y ai P '. ,. •` •..., stret+t work;on Sprinidala Street" Graham Street, .Bolen Av:ntte and Mkcfaddan Avantlr, ttlltt ch . CCU ld bte 'financed rlth'Gar,7ax t'cu►da. A supplerNrntal City lds,Inlstzatar.co�llunler�tion datad April 29. 1976 was ii1+o p{,cscnted to CoUnell iecoawand6.; that:they'ad pt a polity , whereby.the Cl ty, in Yeryrrd to of f-site,,,4nd`other','laproveatant -ottty; etey. be able w. _ " provide assistance through.tha inatallatian,of Public tlorks,iwProvea»rnta to actual "Velopment, therob7 reducing the ette preparation costs. , A motion was 10 a 18 by 'Councilman Shenkmen to opFrove' the proposed t,as 'tax Prcjoc.. h the industrial Areaj 'authatise the'Airector of Public works_ to prepare.tho plans. 'ar1d ' Tr oocifications :#i d advertise for blds .anl further. adopt..the recommended policy, In / regard to off-sits and othot 41wroveawnt.'rosts. The motion was'paasad 14, the. to11094n9 Vote t i AIMS Bartlett, Pattinsono' Coen, Gibbs, Siabart, Shcnkman, Mioder NOES None Anon t None ry • 1.••••f.,l..•..•1.$•4b.saR1111R1 .. 1..goR.R1..1 4,0000*8,111..• On,mat Lott by 11A,r A_ �;..J-Maid Gibbr the tlyulat. Pas-Liny of t1M1 city �s Cttuttetl ur the City of 11ttntingtun UtActt ndluumed'at to atadaitt..: uy J_ 1276,.r....`tt .I!Qj P. IL- in "e,Sta,;^,;,:'�CM46S:A...:....�._......• Tilts awtion'was passed by the following, voter ATLSt' �Jarrlext Efit a.a—St�Gt:ct= cis..,,;llwax ]under ..:.....:.. NULS t �1QOa City Clerk- and ex-oflicto Clark. of r.Its City Co°Anc41 at bile CLty �. . A'1TL'.5T1 of Nuntirgtoik !leach# Cwllfor{tla Alioiu Kt Mtatttwtth itaurrlatt M. Nle4,-fir City CAcrk %3ATV Of- C'ALIF(IAN1A 1. Couikty of Oranya 1 SSl t City of, Huntington beach) t, KLICkA It. "N'twoftrN, the duly elected and qualified City Clesk of th.!'rit♦ ul {ttvQ ingto+t rwach, 'California, do hereby certify that the 'above and'.foragctnti iv ;i teut, Biwa t,urrnct Statcetent of ,Action of the City Council of said ,City -it the4or c411lar totting held tart tho_*A.day of #AS M1 tN{:Sr'ta►1Y lwt�taA attd ►eal of:law uakd City of huntingt.on at this Lhc, ,, day 91 ta City ftoRk .M uN-afftclu Clirk } of:m4 it G ncll o 01« t'ity, o! Mu rigton lwattt, t'.titiornla c f` +� � f :I 1i 'Y t z• yy + IONIR 14, n stxition city- :,l -79 �Iikk6p mouip :-yet At NO PrVai 6d t t -Circle Ici lad�,c7 3 1,)'kk* f FWdo' ' dd c re man o n St e City hwritowv CoMMIlits y ml d , pity x wove., as recdomende' . .41 14 i Statwent of lout, i&O�thm, khnlysis Fuhdino oinatvn'Aiii6-r1s:;ourci,'Alt :Statement- of .'Issuri.. Dan--SAk6r,. . Att6nhey. at,"La*, appke -'at' thie Councilf,Meeting of July..,, 1,6 are' uestin ie f for'-his 'client,. Mr. e" : iov&�c' is f jc6m the "bur' i, en 9 . Laz o' K rc -the aligrusen of. Redohi placid. .by presen proposed t Ci ' AQ Recommendation. i"t In t�e- Jimeinezt, developer, a. total lump. sum .'BeitleAwn Pay,.to'- Richa' rd,,, E. amount 'of $25;'000.n ::AnalLsis: f . ,Please see the, attached memoranduro. from Michael ambory,, -Director. 6 Public 'V40' rks. fund ihg Soiirce: Gaj3, Tax ,'Funds FOR CT • to pe fl N611 • INTER-DEPARTMENT, COMMUNICATION . IMwIN+t:f(1V�ftll To ' Blid,. Belsito ..•; -. -,"Michael zii bony �., Street"Ali `iun' iit� for..' _ July '�0, . ]-979 g . et , u e S act D Circle�Spacific Plan 73-1 . At .their ,meeting 'Jul}•,. 16 the 'City Council requestedtht.,Di rector of Public �lo>`ks::and. the Director 'of Developntient Services - td ,Neat xith Mac, : Richard R:�.. Jimenez, developer,:. in' "order• 'to resolve '.the rlain .,of, excessive costs, involving: an industrial development 'on"the south fafde of Ta11 rt . Avenu© approximately 1, 230 ' feat west of Be'ach� B1Vd.` At 9: Q0,,Ae:M. Thur®day, July 191 :the Director cif' Public; icrks and.` the Director of Development rp;rvices met with Mr . Richard. E. 3'i. :.er to``Analyxz the excessive costs claimed by Mr. Jimenez at the Council Weeding July 15 and a1so. as expregsed.,in . a .- lette'r addressed to the Ci.ty:�Council �from non N. Baheic; attorney. it law, ' dated. June 14 , .1979 a reipresenting 'the. owner, o,f the: property. Mr. Lazio kovacs.. A thorough reviewr w' as ' made of :'ihet history of the' proj®ct and, of the claimed additional costa. Yt appears that the. problem of excessive .costs was brought about to i;ome ©xtent by error of City eriploye'es, by existing ordinance requirements, ' and by interpretation of-.. older policies of ,a City Administrator and City Council 'no longer 'holding such positions. Following 1 1/2 hours of discussion, debate .and analycis, it war agreed that a recommendation be made. to the City Council to, pay to Richard E. .. Jimenez, developer, a total lump sum settlement m the amount -of $25, 000, based upon the following: (1) . 3, 500 sq. ft. of dedicated public right of way in : excess of the half streeet xection normally required. . . . . . . . $12,000 (2) Two storm drain catch .basins and- required ccincrete pipe. . . .$' .8 , 000 (.3) Earth grading beyond the 'centerline of dedicated half street. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . : :$ (A), Excessive architect' s fee• due 'to. Precise Precise Plan of � Street Al i gnuient being made known -after completion of architect' s lan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : $ 2 ,000 P (5) Excessive enginenring required because 'of Precise Plan.'of Street Aligninrent being made known after initial design of, . project was complete. . . . . . . . . . . . . l .+ ♦6• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.'. T 20000 . Grand Total. . . . . . ,..$25 ,000 ter. Jimenez had itemized a listing of items in the amount of. $50,000 which he felt -from his viewpoint were legitimate claims against' the - City.'. However, some of the items involved an interpretation of a memorandwn dated April 29, 1975 ,from • David.. D. Rowlands .to the City Council . (+ropy attached) regardi'ng,,in0uetrial development, .In that memo' Mr. Rowlands suggested the :City provide ' asoistance to industrial developers through a re uetion. of o fsite , improvement costs by having the City. through Gas Tax --- ._, ,. -f.:-.. - .-. ., .-.;. . ....,. .... ... ... . .,.o r.t„a:•a.4.,5.;,41L++l:iisw4Ji P4...b4RJ:. i��,tii1.:�..erG...��i.x,{iZ+w:s:�i�+iil;'Yfii'Sri.,�l:.%��"i%�J�i'�,�'��Z'iG'r'f�/,w)at� AOL Memo .to ,eud Helsito : June 20, 1979 Page 2 expenditure construct streets; sanitary seNer. s, sr.•:rm 'arains and�'wat.er: mains which normally would be constructed by the it:�vekopers rhemxe]vcyn .The ,:policy was applied,,, in varying degrees. for a snort t.itne followinc3 , it;: . adoption. However, with Prop A3, and the general feeling of .the', pstb1.3.G toward. governme'ntal expenditures, it would appear .reanonable'.,for the present City council to reconsider 'thisI policy at '`this time. It is recommended. by the. Director 'of Public' Wotks and the Director of Development Services that the City Cour..^il accept the 'negotiated V $25, 00Q: settlement ,as being fair. ind equitat�le, and that this amount be made -payable. to Richard. E. Jicrenez upon final acceptiarice 'of all Offsite improvements inVolving this development. It iB .furthQr raaommsaded that the City Council authorize payment of the $25;000 fsor,- tbe City's Gas 'Tax 3 Fund. is ae Za.m Director o P lic 9 ADMV"MTK We[ . ` MZ: j y I Attach. ECEIVE. AL 20.1919 .. ... _ .. OF �f��R'�� VM;�� ' Hunfl 1,on, ,'S,Ek--H . C I.?Y OF_:'... , QE Prime A•,. ." TlIAIENT.,C1F DEVEL�JPhlE�t1T .5�RV�C�� - y sUiWlNc nivliIOw 1714t Ut f Pt.AAiNING owialow t7141 6 -srrt i► I P:O.Box 1M;Hl11dTiMOTdi A1EA04.ClSll QA%If�►111 TO _ r ; Hono'rable.-Mayor„and: City ,Counci.l Al'TN c Floyd" 'G. "BelEito,, ,Cit Aftini trator. ",. Y FROM: Jatn�s" w. Pa].ln, . Departaent.,Qf�.•Development Services' DATE: ' July . 12, ' 1979 SUBJECT: '-ATTACHED LETTER,"DATED JUNE 14y: 1979 t IN":RE:.. STREET "AUGMENT 'OU,RRDOkbo, CIAh' SPICIFIC, " PIL" "73-1 ,tt;aGhed "herewith "is ' letter from; Dane" N. Baker", 'Attorney at ".Law, in which he "has;.'request ed to address "the City Council , on'.,the matter of street improvements along : his client' s - westerly property " line. at Talbert Avenue and Redondo Circle. Events as set forth by Mr." Baker in his letter are correct. This _depairt ment has j,n' o explanation 'nf why . the ,"planned alignment` -for Redondo Circle` was missed on. the originally approved '.•AR' 78-59 . Mr. Kovacs , -the property owner, subsequently revised his plan and resubmitted it, for ;-approval, and at that time az•-►- +Iiscovered that the 'original' approval had not " taken "the :street" a"r, ygnment into. con- . sideration. There .has been much 'delay because L;,"' this prior 'o"ver- sight and, as stated by Mr. Baker, the majority", of the street ' is required to be "dedicated .from his client s prl.-, orty. The street alignment and improvement will 'directly: bene'fit the : City' s holdings to the south of the siibject industrial development:'. Because of that beneficial' cr.fect to the value of the City--owned "property, as well. as'. the .delay and. expense caused: by the prior oversighti_ and the majority .dedicati.on,required : from this property,. the Depa'rtme:nt of Development Services, An .our,,revi1ews.."with the repre>aeiitatives 'of the .. .applicant . has, recommended' that. he ' pursue, with " the 'City Counci'1" some ; possible relief from the, street improvements as currently" required. (As a side issue,- when it was determined .that" the street was., required to 'be "dedicated and . improved additional grading was : nece' snairy upon Mr.' Kovacs ' property because of .street grade. The surplua. .earth from this., grading. has, been. given ' to the• .City ; to "partially* mitigate `�th`e.- depression caused through the conatruction of the Taylor Street park site Additional revisions have been. necessa*.-I -oh. Mr,. , K,avacs' site plans ' because of the dedication 'of appi6ximate3ly 35...fe et of. the 45--foot .• 11%dustrial' street se -ction from his property. -These revisions "ware. necessary to acgommodate the required P`Ublic 11 tree t -de' dicaition as,,wpl1 as onsite 'circulation, building. setbacks, and ;landscaping.. Also*, street" improve, nts had bean submitted to the-. Department of Public • ' • Works .'and plan, necked for , the 'orig{sisal' ontitlemont= "these 'impro��emants had, not ''inco ' ated ,the ,necessary design for' the :infiersection '"of Redondo Circle.' rid Talbert Avenue, x1i a' discussion- 'itith the "applicant ? Page 2 we: were i6formed that al-1 of .'these items (i .e. , street: dedication and improvements, ,revised street improv`ment pluns,° add itional' grad i. and delays. have-,cos t.=more than "$40,000. In our .meetings with .the F ro ert owner subse uPnt . to his} P . P , . y' q filing" his 'revised Jplans, ' he.-inquire whether the.' City would ,.pay for any of his Addition al `casts required for .ultimate -development. 'At that time, the staff in�forme'd: Mar: Kovacs of the policy previously adopted b�, the City; .Council to assist . where- .ever feasible in offsite :.improvements .for. _irndustrial and coreenerci.al . - development within the City. Pursuant to 'that policy, Mr.. eatrer's letter is bef6re you for review. We do not feel that the . city',Council' s ..cancurrer�ce for participation for:"a; portion :of the ofPsite . improvements , fok :.this ,dev©lopment + ottld be settih' 9 a 'precedent, as the Council *on 'A rhunber .of, casions' has agreed to street ' imp' rovements. where dedication has been grantee ,by a► property owner. The existingortion of Redondo. Circle was conrstructed. P 1 ; with paricipation _ by ,the City, . as. well as a number 'of, additional streets where Public, Works could arrange for s tree t ' improv=ents in exchange for dedication of right-of-:way. RECOMENDATION in view 'of the above-mentioned facts, the Department " f � Development Services recommends that the City Council pursue one ' - the following suggested actions: I , 1. Approve in concept the participation with the property owner for partial reimbursement for the street improvements as ,'required by the- Board of . Zoning Adjustments on Administrative Review 79-57 ,� and request the .developer to submit to the .Department of Public Works calculations on quantities and costs for these additional street improvements. 2. Approve in concept the casts of street improvements for the north/south„leg of Redondo Circle •as required by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on Administrative Review 79-57 ,and require that the .developer ,submit to the Department 'of Public Works" uantities ' and costs for such .construction and grant reimbursement in exchange for the street right-of-way dedication. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reject the request to participate in the additional street 'improv"ementas as required on this development •pursuant to the Board of Zoning Adjustmenta ' action on Administrative Review No. 79-57. f Should the Council need additional information, the staff dill be pre,- pared to discuss this item with you at your July 16 , 1979 meeting. R pectfully aZitted, James .W. Palin, Directory r/ Depnrtm3nt of Development ServicesJWP:d f Attached: Letter: dated Juno 14 ,t1979 .. _ N 40 AifpN1112t At LAW 's•�+I •� E�:... .VI�,♦ ',' vlf /ItN[NY/ YU11/11►.N h1 11 I f ' tPT . - 1400 N011114 1/au11pN •f'jilt ,1#11 .. . , ALCATOPs CAL110ORN1A 91034 1 / •1 1,979 I�:ntingtoto 1360 C.A 92648 Honorable City.;:Council C:�ty ;cif Huntington Be ach 2000 4aih,st. . Huntington. Beach, CA. 92648 �1f 'Attn: Floyd Belsito City "'Adminl'strator Re: .Proposed Street Aligrunent. of 'Redondo Cirei Specific Plan 73-1 Dear Mr. Belsitoi . .The undersigned represents Mr . Lazlo Kovacs,, "t:he , owner of, property located on the south side. 'uf Talbert Avenue, approximately 11230 feet west of Beach Blvd. , ' in your City . 1 The purpose of this letter is to request a hearing before the gr City Council at the earliest date possible. i We,-.would seek, ' at _ that hearing , relief from the . tremendous bttrd�an placed upon my client by the present proposed alignment of. Redondo . Circle. That alignment will 'parallel the western property line of, my, client's property and take approximately 45 feet from his property. It is 'my understanding that the City Council has adopted 'a•,potioy ' whereby in commercial acid/or . industrial : areas of the City' .-assistance will 'be tendered to the property owner where off-siteimprovements will work .an extreme hardship on the property owner .or some dispro--` . "portionate sharing of' the 'burden is mandated among adjoining property owners . 1 'The factual events in this particular case certainly ,warrant the City's application of that policy to' this property owner. As- background for your consideration I 'would offer the followincj : On t:he 21th "day 'of duly, 197B , a site plan ; AR 78 59 was . approyu ' by the Board, of Zoning Adjustment. of ,your City whereby my. client' - a Honorable - City Cowl ' June 14 , 1979 Attn: 'F1'cyd' $elsit s would' construct -certain industrial ,buildings on his property "pursuant to ihatr-'plan. -No `notice of. the requirementrs of Specific Plan 73--1 `as 'revised was my ,client to my ,client and , but :'for a decision to change r; contractors ermits would have ,.,been ulled,.and- the ro eet ,bui.lt. A11.`without. any 'notice "of,;or requirements for: street improvements on 'the proposed Redondo Circle. When the 'owner made application in AR 79 57 to modify the "Site Plan :in preparation for a"ctual.'construction� the City, 'for the first time notified the owner that Specific ; Plan ,73--1 wrauld have an effect on his 'propoeed `development. Subsequent facts reveal that statement to ,be the major understatement of the year. The proposed street will take approximately 3/4 of its width from my, client 'S., property and because the westerly property is already, developed only approximately 1/4 of the.- width will "come from that property. ti . .That -fact alone is a major 'disproportioning of the burden of improvement in that obviously my client would be faced with upwards of 3/4 of the cost of the street . Since at the time the westerly property was developed no 'provision for the,, ,street was contemplated , the westerly property-'owner was not requiredito bond 'or guarantee for street improvements.' In addition , our "preliminary engineering studies indicate that the adjacer'it property owner has constructed a block wall which encroaches on the City' s proposed right of way and `that the wall ' S footing are as much as -3-1/2 feet higher than the top of the proposed curb of the west side of:. the street, indicating art excessive change in grade from the property as it now stands - and the elevation .of the finished street. Further, the City ' s Public Works Department has indicated a . need .for storm drainage facilities down this' st:rect :but are unable at. this time to provide the details of their projected needs c►r ,any specific engineering requirements. My -client is now -in a position where he must proceed *'Ath all. spend to develop or the. project. will become, economically in Feasible. We have already cbtained a conditional ,exception " t o deal w.i.th: the.; encroachment problems created by the sudden awareness of the proposed street. z do request from you ' a hearing before tY,e City Counc'.11 at,. the }a ' -•• . f )' J, ;t•� t' 1 fit. .r f, '� {' a 1 •'• {+ t �`• I onarable. City .Council f A+•rn: Floy►d.`Bel sit'`{ eaxliQst posibXe `date so .that wee may p1caF3 our :c:Ase to that body at�d somehow overcome the 'tramendoue prob]: ins:.tti t' have snow: arf aen in `the pith 'of":. this �irojeat". Please advice me at our., earliest o rtunit . Y PPn Y•- Very truly.' yours, Le 1 4; UAN ;N. BAXER . DNF3 pd i.. cc:: Laxlo Kovacs Richard E. ; Jimenex ' ,'James W. Pali n �c U , �evAretisca*,:+r..srtrc. iM::-*.a:cap.r::a:.,sic,ru. ', aNf.,.ti.e.:au..,u•aa•.:w,.u:....,....w.. ..... ..,....: ..... .. : .,.-..._.....,:.3�.�..,. , . '' 1'' '' Dr' 1iUri'1f itNf EACH th 7c, 5� r t •`� • COUNCIL '"ApMINISTRATOli' C6MMUNICA'(ION .; :.•' ' lu honorable Mayor )dnd From . Gity' Administrsto`r , City.. Council Members .;z. Subject GAS TAX PlbO tCT Aliril 23r 1976 ( INDUSTRIAL. PARK) • Construction on arterial ' 'h ` hways in industrial arei��s has :been,;per- ` forme) i� the past by the Ci ty ' s use Vof Gas Tax Fuiids .. :' A' project, i ,.. , ,.. present Iy undcrway ..is on .Gothard Street from warner, Avenue to hll z`s 'I Avenue: consisting of.'storm drains , water mains , sanitary sewers 'and street `wid"' g The. total cost of thls project will amount to z approximately . S681 , 803 . 81 financed from Gas Tax'.Fund , Sewer Fund Water Fund Drainage Fund and tin Economic: �Develo menu Adwinistratian B P Grant of $175 000. Bec:ause, of• the possibility- of industrial development in the l.itsk Industrial Park. it has been , sukgcsted that 1he: . City lmtnedintely, pro cerd with a project to complete the street Work on Spraiigdal•e Street Graham Street , Bol sa Avenue and McFadden Avenue a"d jacent `to: the. vacant industrial property . The cost would be approximately :,$348' 972 aind can be financed with 'Gas Tax Funds . This project will not jeiopardize. any project plan for the next 12 �,. months . If this proposa ', meets with the City Counc: il ' s al'proval appropriate action would be to authorize: the Department of . Ptiblic Works to prepare or ' ze: advcrtisin of bids . the. l tins and spec 1 f icat 10.e5 and to auth �. � P P 8 R1iCOMMCNUATION Approve the Proposed Gets Tax Project in the industrial area and authorize: the Uepartmr. it of ' Publ is Wanks to prepare the 'plans and specifications anti to authorize advertisement for bids . Respectfully submitted , David h. Rowlan s City Administrator ' UUR/ FGB : p COUNCI L' `AD'MINISTHATOR COMMUNICATION IR 1IA4.11IN•1 UP la 1.6riorhble Aayor mane" Frs►m City Auministrntor City. t;otinci l Memlicrs Sul}jest t1A.� '!'AX NftOJ1:C,'1' Date Aliri I 29 , 1976. ( iNNSTRIAL PARK) This L'A is .rr , s't�pPlement .,to t:A. '16-'S61' wltich,vas -de1'c:r`rec! :from the: "� April 46ih Council meeting;.. , .The ..Ci ty .Coi tinei1 has it .event l -occns ions 'cxIire.0,'bd a des i'e•o ror .cttr if to : work closely with - the owners ,aiid developers o•f, c6minercial , und,. indus , ; trial property in order` to establish. a str,ongcr to `base' , ' operation . a ► t c • ' t m, he a • rs l i tih d t ex ell i ►ns ti • e 5 t on the.• l►•trt of the Ct y y . c.ca p c .y ! �, t IY .� ! n: c, . _silk .: the `plans through the various Ciry - dcp.�rtnients nni! by reducing ,off-'site .. improvement costs' such as :streets , sanitary sewers , storm drains .and. water ma'ills- which would normally be borne by the developers: , Thc , staff 'is cur rent,ly reuvalAtating ' tire prbccdufres by which, plans can be "More 'effectively processed and will ha suhtni t t ing; a, recrnntntinda ti.on . as a part of the rewrite of Division 9, (Planning rind...Zortiitg) ' With regard to ufC= s i tc and ut)tcr improvement c opts , Ole t:i ty m.-1y be ;ihlr to provide assist.rtncc through th , instalkitiun of' . 11tih is Werks improve rrent s to � ac:tua 1, deve I opment , thereby red tic in}, th'c sl t:c ' I)rvliar ation COS ts . RECOMMENDATION . Adopt this policy and aut Ito rizc staff to 1)rocee'd accordingly Respectfully subm.itted ,' D. v i d 1). ltowl;rnds ' City Admi.nisttutor I)DR . 1) `:f.74 M:i •t+.u.-�.y/n•.1[...}.".t'..Y.Ji:..:ei.it H•.1rt.•irrJ,tilrA/..i-r•-wati.••rw..:.::..:t..•..w.c.w.ay L lw►.+.i:r:i- 'rw r.... ..+..g ti....Srui"1n:G..._ ;...:... ..:.ti.:7F.W .- u ni nt�L^a■•f can. eah, P,O: HOX iti0 CALIFORNIA IZG";, k U!�!•!CE.U!� Till: Cl't'Y .AUAilNI�.t'ltATOR May 19 , 197ti ttunting ton''Beach .Indu'strial Park ;f; P. O. B6x ,214Q r . Newport Beach, California 92663 I , At en'Cion: Mr. David W. Ari'ss, Vice President Gentlemen : J.� This letter is to serve as written Confirmation Of items ,of ''general agreement 'as to areas of responsibility for providing impruvements_ r a on the �prope ty located north of. McFadden. Avenue between Springdale- ...•, . r Street.'and Graham Street. This matter. has been discussed with •the . City Council and they have concurred with this approach. Please refer to a ' copy of the attached 'City Council Minutes . The City . Council has reprioritized Gas Tax 'Projects to establish a ' project .'on the aforementionedproperty. Said ro •ect will provide'. P a P ] for the following: 1. Enc ineerinc • The Project will include preparation of plans - to construct street improvements on Springdale Street, McFadden Avenue, and Graham Street. 2. S tree t 1Tprovements - The Project will provide for construction - of all street improvements as required try the improvement plans for ,Springdale Street, McFadden Avenue, and Graham Street.. Sidewalks will not: be included as a part of, this construction'''` on the east side of Graham and the ' north side 'of McFadden , but will be `wor, a :uut as ..a requirement development of the property''abutting the two streets. The City will consider a` modification to the standard sidewa requiremk!nts and/or a landscape belt .irr lieu of the sidewalk requirer'ent:.] 3 .. Street Li1hts = The Project will include, street lights on Springdale Street: ,) McFadden Avenue, and Graham Street. 4 . Median Divider - Improvements do not include installatinh Qf a 1a dscape median divider on Springdale Street and McFadden Avenue. The City will not require the cieveloper of the ' adjacent parcel to install this improvem1ent:. :.. �t�bon�r 17191 SJG•S2 Tt 0! � ' �• Page 2 • - . , _ '` • .. � � : t. The standard City street tree requirement: = fc�r �'4i" ' box trees wi l`i not be included as 'a part of fthe Gas Tax Projec:to is%t;. will, be,.worked out , a. a , c4ndif.,ion: of : development of: t lie adjacent , property . . The Ci sty ,will 41 ... .. consider al�lowiriy'the street tree reyuiremerzt.. r,0 be incorporated as a part., of ..the landscape requirement: `of ad jacent, .property. 111sofar as storm drains are concerned', the :City of N.untington :aeach requesUs that the Huht`i%gt:on" Beach Industrial Park construct' the sto•-m . drain . system ,required for, the "developfaent 'of Springdale StreQt , ttcFaddejt Avenue, .ana Graham..Stre' et. . Since .thi.s ."is .a- Master;" Planned .Project, the cost of the drainage facility will b6` a Olied .as credit �. ,toward.. payment of 'draiinage 'fees,: The.'City will' not requ re `installation `uf a water lane 'on .Springdale Street :The"'developer .`of `the property west `of ar�d contiguous 'to Springdale Street will be 'permitted ta. "hot. trap". ',as. necessary the existinq. 36" line in Springdale Street at the '. tim'e- the property ' is developed.; It will be the resPonsibil" tY of the d velo er t o provide , `•. •t • '_ fire hydrants (approxim'ately ' 4 ) on Graham Street as required by the Fire Department. There is no ,requirement nor Is there a need for the ,liuiitington Beach 'Industrial Park 'to install an .identifi.cat=ion monument,.,or. to, provide a separate landscape area „at the northwest corner of Springdal.e' .'Street and McFadden Avenue to identify the: industrial park.'. r' Huntington Beach Industrial. Paris will. be responsible for processing the various parcel maps , tentative parcel maps, preparation of storm 'f drain plans and installation. of master .storm dr-ains . ',Additionally , Huntington each Industrial Park will bb responsible for all. fees and assessments normally charged 'by the City ' for industrial. development. It should be clearly understood by all parties_.that the repprioritizing of the Gas Tax Project.- to move this project up higher on the priority . list was done to enhance, the desirability 6f ' thi6 site for the Weiser Lock Company . Should the Weiser Lock 'transaction, with the Huntington ' Beach industrial Park not be fulfill6d , the imp rovements. outlined herein will. 'be subject to further review which may postpone such . 'improvements. The contents of this letter constitute. a . statement ofapplicabIp City policy and should not be 'construed as bestowing upon any person or organization any benefit or duty not otherwise provided by law.., Yours very truly, r • It . E. Hartgc Floyd Belsito Di rector 'of 'Public W rks� Actiiq City Administrator . Reviewed by ity Attorney R chard Harlow ' Director of Planning and Environmental Hasourcas rZ Asai s � sot City AUR ney .i AgWo1'ATLI4I7Jrr Of THL ALIIUN OP "l: CITY tYA11 j • , rrlureI I Cilia +•tt y,lt.r1 t er ou fit tnytulr'ik'.Ich, t'.Mlt'Urtll,l HaYcr Wirder 4.1llyd the regular s.ttrlll of .tho CILy'w1u1C11 of t1�:.:Ciiy c+[.''.Iuntington beach tfl`otder st 7800 P.M. .�.lhl,lt±tt. P■tL tiia. S9ahstt.-attia4]<a:.n, Ylede& 1a11ae///010/116ae11ae11aaa1�la 1aa lRa�iiii111�11,a,1'.a of*a a el rr//i//all so as 1//1i11a1ii11. GA5'TAX'Pf0.1 T I11DUSTRIAL PAM - (CA 76.56�„tA110 (CA176-56M_ The City Clerk. preaanted,a comuracation from the City!AdmInistrator dated April `21, ;5 ,19.76, cccnrarlendinq thnt.�the City. lrmledi�ately proceed with a �project•�ta,COVVI tas thw. , at rent work`an Springdale.Street,.Groham Street,. Bolen".'►venue.and _McFadden Avenue vhlch "' coulA be iliulnced Frith Gas Tax Fundt:. : X suppletrental city hdminlatrator.cammication• til " dated April' 290 1976 aas A11to presented to.Council recommending that they adopt'a policy. ' Whereby the:City,in regard to off site end other itq+rovets+ont cwrlts, ray be able to :• provide assistance•.through L'he' lustallation of Public Works iraproveaents.to actual development, thereby reducing the site preparation costs. . A motion was made by Counrllm= Shenkran to approve the pr'oFo50 ties Tax Project in t the Industrial.Areaj authorize the nitector of Public Works to prepare the PlAns 'end 1 specifications and advertise for bids and further, adopt thn'reccAmanded policy In reQird'to oft-site and other ir+rrovement: costs. ` The cation was passed by the follavinq Vate r AVES1 Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder s 1409St !lone )ASENts Hone , .. /1a11eaa1aa aaalaalaY/alas/a/aaaaaaal laa•aa1111a1e1aaae1eal•1111 a1ea1era/1laeaa1111111a � ':. On motion by narttnu br,,_,_. Ilc teyuler meLing' ur tlut City . c wsscii or the City nt Huntington Uench adjourned al tt' 'r 0 AAX. MV A- 147�.-,_4t-lion g•...1'.. in Lhc. tt>vr 1 ► rruCfl .-...._.' Tlit, ration was passed by the following outer AYt:St ..AjZL1CLt. " nttlnsren. ZCy, Ulbbb, Sirk man- WSSr't:1 ....,.....�. ANSttlTr�na1 Alicia M. Wentworth _ City Cis-'t and ex-atiiclo.CJljkr. of the City Council tit th�r l.'ity ATTl..STt of Nuntinyton Beach, California Alicia M. Wentwurth Marriott M. wisder City Clvrh Mayor . .. ' li1A'ft: OI' l:Al.l1't1iUUA ) l,,•. Cuussty of Orange ) SSt City of itlintington UesCh) t, ALICtA M. tir"TwoRrit, the duly elected and qualified tatty Clerk Of the Cit+ , ui tlwltfmltoll beactl, California, do hereby ctirtify that the aMve and.,foreg^lnq Ill's tru%, alo LttrreCt. St.itcawont of hetion of the City Council or eosd, city .tt ttwsr tePlllar - iQet my held on rile Ud day of 11I1Nt'sr. ray h.tr,? .md t•eal of ►hu't,aid City of iluntington patch this the'ltth ..Jay of 1 City Clark and ao: fttclu cl-Irk of thl City council 01 thr City. HU ngtorr itnauh, t:•ttiltirtila , tit th7puty ,.11T OF MIC AC 71i1ii Or TH1: C1'1•Y MIC11, r—rr-,". {�1 ��►�' lop „ ; rciunci 1 C.'h.►talh 1 , i•it 'r 1!.r ) 1 . '� Uili i►lt,)t.+ah it ' i • t' r 1 r ''ur'tri r ' �'' l l-Alt:11. ,{ ,• //�; Sr ;t� a^r: �.'j9 tla or '•4 it~ciex+ i 'tiitl�l't� t.)1t:° ragUlar mt;l!tlnef ,of t:t1U ,CiLyi l►�{flltlell :4' �', ►t', tl.0 't'it.y: crf,•';ffut�tingtoti'`lleduh` 'Fo';order. citt•7:00tNM (. •�� +�f�r),{f •,. .'1,• (,.,: 5 •` r i ='-' S. 1'. - f• i?l• .t ! .:•r ..'f t, ;f!. .. �' 1, /`L),�t� ' ; s t r'�f,•• !} "lsivt,i!t1L nc7rt�r;�-�� i4 1-, 6bn ltiha, 3n rt .� _;:__' A �I� f.. p• t '3s?t S a Inn n tr :.01tL: ` lion+• *4A4a1kRAAARARAA+lift/fR#AA#RMA6kiA#f ►#AR/rRRR1##A�RAtkf'#AAA#kAA#RAAA# ARfAR#fA# fk#k'Af#tk1% ' .. r• .1 °GFiS TAX �PRWbCT . M.DUSTRIAL PARK (CA' 76~S6) '4Alli) +(CA 16-56A) : The Cit1 ;Clerk presented a communication from the CitX Admirlit;tratcir 6ated 'Apti1 23, 1976; recoTinending that the'City, immediately .pr`oreled kith a� pxoject. to :campleto trle {t strecG .work 'on Springdale -Street, Graiham.Street; Bolsa Avenue and .McFadden`Avenue,:which :' could be i'inanced' with Gals Tax.Fund �� supplemental City--Admihiistrator: o4 mmunication ..r darted,April 29, 1976 was also presented to Council recommending that •they,adopt—a policy khc'ri:by the City, in regard to off--site and other iinprflvement' coats, tray be zible to. ;provida assistance through the i'i:stallatiori of Public..Works improvements to actual:;, . } deve].opmdnt; ` thereby reducing.'the site preparation costs. yr; ti _ r A motion was made by Councilman Shenkman to a'pproty e. the proposed. Gast:Tax Piojcct"in t L}lt'. Indristrial Areaj 'authorize.: tyre .pi'rector of Prbli'c k'orka: to prepare ,the"•'plans and ' 1, specifications And advertise for bids and further, adtopt..thea recclinmended policy iii regard to 'off-site On* d other' improvement costs . The notion was'passe'd by, tha'.following . vote �I AWES: Bartlett, Pattirson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman,.,Wieder , '• , • x NOES hone ABSENT: Ilona ♦• AAAAArAAA1ArAAAAAAiAAAAAk1k itAAAAAAAARkAAAAArAAiArAA#AAAAAtAAeAAtit to 00 •AAAlA •A1AA On motion by nj;rt tit r . •Irr�cnr3 �'t]�1kZr ths»• r�syulaz lneeUti.ng of t.lio City C6uarcil of tile.• Cityof tiuntingt.atti Bench ad juurned at ttr- ,�anY. 11•,y 1g76 sit.:_L I� r1. �•i.n the ua�{„� This wt:ion was passed by the f0'11owing vute: AY1;S ill icia t7. {►'taYt_worth. City Clerk ar►(t ex•-off icia Clerk +' exf the City Council of tilt: City h'1mS' T: of Huntington Beach# Csilifornia Alicia M. Wealt_wortt; � Harriett M Wieder City Clerk Mayor STATV 01' CAI.i e-'OU11A I County of Oranqu ) ` SS: City of Ifuntitiy ton ;Beach) 1, h1.1C1•A, M. W'EIIT OH'111, tiler duly elected and yuali fled City Clerk .aC eh.� City of fltutt ►rlsiton .fle.•ach, California, do hereby, certify that the, abr)res and ftrreyririg ! is, a ( rue and correct. StaLetnent' of Ae:ti-a11 of, the City COW" Of s,ald (dly, .et then r, r.e�g�ltar: Cock in• field on t1te , .,day. of na s .14 }e`� e ,' • � , ,+ ,. ' W1't•NI:S!, my hJI'I'd ails. heal of : tile. .,.1id Ci.t:y •of. Huntington Beach"this the: ;L,•� Y l'• } May 1976 .11 ...�....:.�111.u',.i.�..b...�.ht:•.�z.iacsua>i�._:.'_.,_�, :,; CityCIurk. and ex-of fici0 CI xk I . of:, the ei t:Y Council o: th►� i:i+•� ;iC of 31t)r iyitc�tttt•, �ltr.1t,11, Cstll� ~31'1{1.1' f3e1��t1t.}i'.