HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRECISE PLANS OF STREET ALIGNMENT - Multiple Plans from 1985 (2) PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE ' I PUBLIC NOTICi I=�ItBLIC NDIIGE' "'1_PUBLIC N0110E' �`•
NOTICE OF PUBUr.HEARINO1MI t
(LAE S EE ELEMENT 87A ZONE CHANGE 87-4 `�� 3) N 1�K ; r
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing In t �sta t1as�fff�r� untingto Beech ;z 1
ChAc Center,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California on the date And at the time Indicate ow to a D� , the etas to
' ,of all persona who with to be heard relative to the application described below t e 1
1 t!GATE,February 1 /888,Monday ' 1 ; 4rF 1 I y t r OVNCrj�.. = I {- I
K. ,: 1. �1 i^:x1f- o7•.r,Zj - s : +r'.1..,'' ,�":C. .. t * ' r4_ r.
o TIME 7=P M. ;4i F'_v ■�
1--., f41r 1•+lt1 G j„
k ,ems'"ECT.Lend Use Element Amendment 87-3,Zone Change 87-4 and Environmental Impact R q{t "Iij 1•`+��'.
(; 1
t APPLICANT: re Eldon W.Be etad. reserited ob Reit Coronwof Corona Develo ment Corp. Inc r"1
rA
- LOCATION Eutside of Delaware Street approximately 286 feet north of the Intersection of.Dslawere Street and Oer11Nd'Avenue
j m`PROPOBALI Amend the General Plan by redeelgnetlnp a 1.14 acre site from Medium Density Residential to Senior Residential with a concurrent
r ;Zone Change from R2(maximum 18 units/acre)to O-R3-SR(Ousllfied-Medium-High Density Residential,28 unite/acre eombined with a 8enlor r,y
I•,�_Residential suffix):With a 80 percent density bonus,this designation would allowa 42 unit senior residential project.The"0"will require
;agreement cena,rrent with the Issuance of the Conditional Use Permit. _;rlr:'-�•:
v` NVI ERONMENTAL STATUS Environmental Impact Report No 87 3_assessing the environmental Impact of the project will alto be considered R t
-by the City Council -- - - t' f.dk!
_,.. +-•n:, �, + -
r r`,•-t• t:l.�^* -r.rttr 5-Tm,>;tal -i`3 -;F:
'iy!OH PILEi Community opment Dsysl
ALL INTEREITED PER80N8 are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application Be outlined
above:All applications,exhibits,and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Mein Street,Huntington Beachl,
11 California,for Inspection by the public: 1rt ., : } ;y y 1
+ ,N710,NTINOTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL,By:Allols M.Wentworth,City Clerk,Phone:(714)no-am
Dated 1120/88
FX 4.
o t» C. L%V�" ga•aae f'liwi lhed Huntin ton Beach Inds ndent. January 28, 18t18 I I c
MI r1 -: 'a---Li:fn I_ +r,C2 b
r` y Rk0 CO t ;
IFI' I:,;.r �i"CF Ci 1i,1 RI. R_I rU1J�:
il-;t�,Al n RI IjR3rnr z
•RII• RP RI •'
.�{; I,,
.
R ■i " • ,r t7
Of
r :
H 'MI 0R2C '
MI-CI ...R2 - r - I 2 �. C2
RA-0-0 �.� R2
M2 0• R3
MI 0 R3�R2` "•.■
_
-
"- - i q- ■�O �a.p 0 1 --;,f., .,.,_.,•. ■ ,. line-:. ,w..er / r"- Y- i
a,, • Y RL C 4
t -l:s+-, • t MI 01^
M t �.: - - :•:..--.y, PaCa<CA COttatlre77 '•R3 t
w 1 /.1DISTRIGI oEl- s
3qt It I D t F t I,rf2.01:a• lit Q I ..s, u s 1
l MI.01� ' 7 �' R6
. ' 13 ti I
: a' l
1 #• •F jd-.yn _ RA-Oe 8 R8 Re.! R2
FA
cl
/ I R2 MFi ^I I ; �•
MI MI. .R2'I� - ! I--� C2
U u MIA y
T"
o: ,RA-O: R2R2 R2 y R2/ R2
RE ZAN R2MI
t
ME
2 es R2_ i"f ? i.
.,•1 _ •,•,... r. ff*- �- it
R2.0•PD (• ^ - � •R2,D �R2 R4 R2 R2 1 1-
,� r C2.0•CD!_ .C2-0 v`;: r,r. ,: a .� R2-
02-0-PO tr •N2-0 �, all
' 1, #r.q+' , .I p.,•,1- _ L' I i r of
,,.�{ '� - r• s >! v+r!-n,(r- -1+� :ti 'X'!u■i•t11 i1 ro- R2 - R2 `
R2
t} ..� F••f.s,1a,. I '.e T j u e•ae I R 2 I l
,, _ a. . ._ , ,•.:..eta ,�: r.
.. FcG.,3
-
Ki L 1 t f
-'EXISTING.
ZONINGre
j ' r huntington_beach planning 'division
PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE •, PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA�,�G
PRECISE PLANOF STREET ALIGNMENT NO._87-2
REPLACING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 74-3
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN-that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council
Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center,2000 Main Street, Huntington.Beach, Calfornia, on the date
and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons'who wish to be heard
relative to the application described below.
DATE:Tuesday, September 8, 1987
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
SUBJECT: Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 87-2
i
APPLICANT:City of Huntington Beach
LOCATION:South of Talbert Avenue west'of Beach Boulevard(between the easterly terminus of Redondo
Circle and the southerly terminus of Kovacs Street).
• i
ZONE: M1-A(Restricted Manufacturing District) i
I
PROPOSAL:To extend.Redondo Circle from its existing easterly terminus to the existing southerly terminus
of Kovacs Street.
t
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 87-9 will also be considered in conjunction with
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 87-2. I
- i
ON FILE:A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department. A copy of
the staff report will be'available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)'
on September 4,1987.
i
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said'hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for I
or against the application as outlined above.All applications,exhibits,and descriptions of this proposal are on j
file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by'the "
public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL,By:Alicia M.Wentworth, City Clerk, Phone(714)536-5405 '
Published Orange Coast-Daily Pilot August 27,"1987 Th049 !
QREcISE f7LNA 'OF 'BEET
AI�IVNMaW Na -I- 2 . .AVE.
-r r�
Happy
xLL
C.
rp
a
S
lU
C F-R = Lam• r..arTH
- - - — -- t!k'N+F�c•a :I r P VTTt;TI.F.T
l `(
LOADR.
HPI
- — TARP DR a•,;.'4aV F,
Ft N
rV DEC OR
'lTI:er r
AlKATA
1N�on 1••lN AM(lIN •011
• fin - rTT7TTTTTl
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public
notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County,
California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961. and
A-24831. dated 11 June, 1963.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange Public Nouce AOvenipn0 covered
by INS eNidavit IS tit in 7 point
with to pica coiumn i idih
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen,
years, and not a party to or interested in the below
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the
NEWS-PRESS, a.newspaper 'of general circulation,.
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa,
County of Orange, State of California, and that a
Notice of Public Hearing
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa,
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley,
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna
Beach issues of said newspaper for one time
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of
Aug. 27 198 7
198
198
198 `�1'P1ZO v
E�BY
� CIZ.�,
198 \.. CU
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the 19•-
foregoing is true and correct. cjTY
Executed on Aug . 27 ; 198 7
at Costa Mesa, California.
Signature
- PROOF OF PUSLICATIOPJ �'��
J
REQUEST FOR CITY- COUNCIL rzCTION'
Date SPptAmher 8 . 1987
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
A.
Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Director, Co ni y Development
Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 87-2
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative_ tions, Attachments:
o�veo, a,Y C_�.__ C�L
STATEMENT OF ISSUE•
Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 87-2 to replace Precise Plan of Street Alignment No.
74-3 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 87-2 is a proposal to
extend Redondo Circle from its existing easterly terminus to the
existing southerly terminus of Kovacs Street.
RECOMMENDATION'' i
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 87-2 .
The Planning Commission will review the -proposed Precise Plan on
September 1, 1987. The Planning Commission' s recommendation and
comments will be presented at the September 8, 1987 City Council
meeting.
ANALYSIS•
The original alignment of Redondo' Circle, as shown on. the 1973
Taylor and Beach Specific Plan, began at a point 600 feet to the
east of the railroad right-of-way, and extended southward from
Talbert Avenue 660 feet to a cul-de-sac. Precise Plan of Street "
Alignment No . 74-3 was adopted by the City Council (Ordinance 1951)
on December 16, 1974 . This action moved Redondo Circle 310 feet to
the west of the original alignment and curved it eastward to the
original cul-de-sac location -(see attached Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 74-3) . On February 21, 1978, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 4590, amending the Taylor and Beach Specific Plan and
extending Redondo Circle 330 feet to the east to intersect a
proposed north/south street (Kovacs Street) . (See attached
Amendment to Taylor and Beach Specific Plan. ) The purpose of the
connecting loop system was to serve industrial properties that were
then undeveloped.
PIO 4/81
The proposed new street alignment will also form a connecting loop
system, but will realign Redondo so that it extends northeasterly
from its existing terminus to the existing terminus of Kovacs
Street . This conceptual alignment was approved by the Planning
Commission on July 7, 1987, with their approval of the conceptual
site plan for Boureston Development (Administrative Review No.
87-15, Use Permit No. 87-34 and Negative Declaration No . 87-9) .
Boureston has developed a detailed site plan which incorporates that
portion of the street alignment located on their site. The detailed
site plan and associated variances were approved by the Planning
Commission on July 21, 1987 (Conditional Exception (Variance) No.
87-61) .
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 87-2 will impact properties to
the north and to the west of Boureston' s site. To the north, a
triangular piece of property approximately 1, 700 square feet in area
will be required for right-of-way purposes . The property owner has
submitted conceptual development plans to the City for an auto
center, and is working with staff to incorporate the proposed
right-of-way into the project.
To the west, there is an existing industrial building which will
also be affected by the proposed Precise Plan. Approximately 716
square feet of land will be required for right-of-way purposes, and
the new alignment will create a 7-1/2 foot building setback
(includes 5 ' public utilities easement) from the existing structure
to the curb line. Although the required building setback is 15 '
(10 ' + 5 ' public utilities easement) per the Ordinance Code, the
Planning Commission may issue a Certificate of Conformance for the
building so that any future development of the site will not be
adversely impacted by the City' s actions . The 7-1/2 foot setback
will allow for intensified landscaping. A total of 24 spaces are
currently required for the 12, 000 square foot building on the site,
with 27 spaces provided. One on-site parking space will be
eliminated by the proposed alignment, leaving a total of 26 spaces .
The current property owner has expressed support for the connection
of Redondo Circle and Kovacs Street because it will increase the
visibility of his business and will reduce the incidence of
vandalism, grafitti, and loitering associated with the existing
dead-end situation on Redondo Circle. Circulation around the
building will not be affected since a driveway to the rear of the
building will be replaced on the realigned Redondo Circle.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The subject proposal is covered by Negative Declaration No. 87-9,
which was approved by the Planning Commission on July 7, 1987. The
Negative Declaration also covered Administrative Review No. 87-15,
Use Permit No. 87-34 and Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 87-61,
a request to permit a 125, 000 square foot industrial building for
Boureston Development.
RCA - 9/8/87 -2- (8971d)
The primary environmental concerns identified with regard to the
Precise Plan of Street Alignment were traffic circulation, air
quality, and cumulative impacts. Staff analyzed those impacts in
conjunction with the Boureston Development project and concluded
that there will be no significant adverse impacts on the environment.
FUNDING SOURCE•
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council may choose to:
1. Deny Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 87-2 and retain the
existing Precise Plan of Street Alignment.
2 . Approve an alternative alignment of Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 87-2
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Area map
2 . Existing and proposed precise plan
3 . Ordinance
4 Legal description of precise alignment
5 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 74-3
6 . Amendment to Taylor and Beach Specific Plan (1978)
DNL:MA:LP:kla
RCA - 9/8/87 -3- (8971d)
MI-CD <MI _ ---__ -- R2
=4` o x - R5 i<
SP-1
V
e�t
MI. R2l•- eb1 el/e a-MI ea.a-e-no6MlCD R3"R3F22 R3' C4o SP- (MI-CDMI MI coil
---�� T--- TALBERT` - AVENUE _�-
i ca so. R
�,MI-CD 3
MI-A U1 -PD eo RI
MIA r ' 'C4 CF-E A0.3
I R4 SR I K q 1eV-✓J
o+ .o
e {1 R4-SR R2-SR 1
C 4 I °°
RI RI
CF—R ,< - .... MI—CD r:TeIE:::-. R I T RU AYE*X RI
°';a•*!rr�:c. •-� MI-A - -R4-SR RM
t MI-CD ,, r�' RI RI a
RI P.I
CF-R RI ^ C2 V •rNE9 RNEa ♦.
•-o. R a --
g-- —Lm ow. m RI RI
RI R `00v _ so ' T• .R DR L[[ q
4 C CD ' M I Mh to
RI ONTARIO DR C 2 Rl I R,
- RI t ,� Y Ri,
�s Rz _ RI R
= RI Rza .a
CF-C €Mlu ow c. _�omeEc oR RI RI R soo.e"Al r' >n3 RI Y
jj ��
RIRI 33$ ALEIERTA > RR3eR o •C4MI-CD RI RI RI RI o Ir R2 'RI
ORM I Y ON DR RI o RI. RI o
o
ccRI R3 -x. RI R2 a! R2 R°�°=ot
E IS .._.L_ �- 'li
R ------ ---- - --
-T—
W
R2 R3 ,R3
' - nn
IF
FMA fo -*-4
HUNTINGTON BEACH
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
rILVt"UJC V _ L.wi Vr i im-L i noun i u.►. t -
- : TALBERT AVM
J >>old
w
I .
.. .. M ..'.
EX STING PLAN 0P STREET- AUGNMENT- 1--
TALBEP\T AVE . oe
- WIM117�
r P��
P
co
�.
(�
pPi h�
p�E•`o -
k
't o,
99 �.
.!�1 0 0 0
Bq 1 .1t i
4 i5' LO
s �
N 1
\\ 0 4 m h i
•\S fV �iy '� V
o Q n
D p
�LJ'/A11t�'16 � r��a• -
D
• Al { ,' A �p
11 11 c /
iw
(e+ y c
+
I`
! i �
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PRECISE STREET ALIGNMENT
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK C OF .TRACT MAP .NO. 570 FILED IN_-BOOK 19, -
PAGE .41 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, - RECORDS -OF ORANGE COUNTY ,
CALIFORNIA.
.PARCEL - 1 :
BEGINNING AT- THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF TALBERT AVENUE AND
KOVACS -CIRCLE ;- THENCE S 0° 44 ' 20" E 230. 90 FEET ALONG THE
CENTERLINE_-OF KOVACS CIRCLE ; THENCE S 89°15 ' 40 W 12. 50 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 0° 44 ' 20" E 98 . 83 FEET ,
ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 12 . 50 FEET WEST OF THE
CENTERLINE OF KOVACS CIRCLE , TO A POINT -ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 13065 AS SHOWN ON A. MAP FILED IN BOOK ,
PAGE( S ) OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS , RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA; THENCE S 89 °10 ' 10" W, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF
LOT 1, 68 :35 FEET; THENCE N 45° 06 ' 36" E, 39. 03 FEET TO A TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 100 . 00 FEET ;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
45050 ' 56" , AN ARC LENGTH OF 80 . 02 FEET ; THENCE N 89° 15 ' 40" E ,
10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: : .
BEGINNING -AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 13065 ,
PER MAP -THEREOF _FILED IN BOOK , PAGE(S ) OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE .COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ; THENCE
N 89.010 ' 10" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 261 . 37 FEET TO
THE .TRUE POINT ;OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH
LINE 64. 45 FEET TO A POINT ON A -CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 145. 00 FEET , A RADIAL LINE THROUGH WHICH POINT
BEARS N 47046 ' 13"_ W; - THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY- ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH_ A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 205248" , AN ARC LENGTH OF _7. 29 FEET ;
THENCE S 45006 ' 36" -E 407. 89 FEET TO. .THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE ,
CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 145. 00 FEET ; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID_ CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF -
13056 ' 33" , AN ARC LENGTH OF 35. 28 . FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
- LINE OF SAID LOT -1 , A RADIAL LINE .THROUGH WHICH POINT BEARS
N 30°56 ' 51" W; THENCE N 0°44 ' 28" W 56 . 76 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY
LINE; --THENCE N 45006 ' 36" E 364. 26 -FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING. -. _
PARCEL 3: - -
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 7- AS SHOWN ON A
PARCEL MAP -FILED IN BOOK 79 , -PAGE 15 OF PARCEL :MAPS, RECORDS OF -
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE ALONG -THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
PARCEL 7 , AND THENORTH LINE OF REDONDO CIRCLE, S 89° 11' 11" W
_72. 83 FEET TO- THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY ,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 100. 00 FEET ;- THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A`CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44604 ' 35" , AN ARC LENGTH OF
76 . 93 FEET; THENCE N 45°06 ' 36" E, 4. 60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 7 ; THENCE S V44 ' 28" W, 31 . 36 FEET ALONG
SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT - OF BEGINNING.
-87537
8/4/87
........................
�Illlifltllllllllllll#111
r111111111111l11111111111 •
IIt1111111t11111111111t11 ,
1l1111!!l11t11l1l11lIAlt!
It111111111111/Iltii1a111 ��
!11l11l1!!1!1lIIIIIIt11t
illlitltlllllllllli#If111 �
111111111111!l1111111#111
Illllllllltlllltlitllilti •'
111l111111l1l11l11111111
t111Ntllitllllliltlllit
INIIIIIIIIItNti111
IIif11111t11111t11t1111 �
Itl1111111/111t111l11111 � �����,"
111111lIItt1111f111#IIIN �
111111111111i11illrllllN � lolling
,,®e�
It1111llltillllilliillt
IIIIIIIII11111111111M 11 �e
IIIt111111111fIf1111t1
111t111 Igloo 1l11111111111 milli
'
1/111t1111111tI11111a11!/ �® ,
1111111111111111111111111 �� ■,�0 1�r
IIINt111M/111111f/11#It �®O , ,
�o
MINE ®� 1■ A •.
®a
• 00 INmom
MIN IN
l y� iININ I
M ®o��oo��oot0�
. 111 I p
�
.il!l111 tll I •
1111111 I f l I •Itlllli 111 1 � n 1
I it -ill
Illlllfl • 111 I •
//111111 111 ,����������
IIIIIIII/IIlll�litllltlll
1111111111111111111111111 • •,
Illllllllllllllllllltllll
tttlt11ti11111111trIt1111 ��rrrrrrrr ' rr
iltlllllllllllllllll - tl
11111111111111111111 11
Illillllllllllllilii � 11 - -®rrrrrrrr •
11111111111111111111 11
rllllllitlttttlmll � 11 . �
11111111111111111111�� ., 11 ..,,,,,�,® •�� � Itlllllilllll1111111 11
111111111111!!l11111 11 + . • .
illllllitillillllllllllll ®� ; �rrr ..
N111r1111/IIIllldldrll�l
Ilarr� ItlNllt1111111111111lI1i
Tllitllilfl�lllll11111111� `:: �®rr ' 11
_Laws �.� �- � • •
" --���-�2
ia�i.-w..w�aww
=swami MISSION
•INM-•A �
�- -
----w—' -
..w
w.�w_�..�.w•s.1 +rr r� •
w
• •r® �► •
somas ..mom
rr- •
w .0-M�- � �rrrrrlrr 11
_ Publish 8/27/87
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 87-2
REPLACING PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 74-3
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that - the Huntington Beach City Council. will ho
ld apublic hearing in the Council Chamber at .the Huntington Beach
Civic' Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the -time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
. application described below.
DATE : Tuesday, September 8, 1987
TIME : 7 :00 P.M.
SUBJECT : Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. .87-2
APPLICANT : City of Huntington Beach.
LOCATION : South of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard
(between the easterly terminus of Redondo Circle and
the southerly terminus of Kovacs Street)
ZONE : M1-A (Restricted Manufacturing District )
PROPOSAL : To extend Redondo Circle from its existing easterly
terminus to the existing southerly terminus of Kovacs
Street .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Negative Declaration No. 87-9 will also be
considered in conjunction with Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No. 87-2 .
ON FILE : A -copy of the proposed request is on .file in the . .
Community Development Department . . A copy of the
staff - report will be available to interested parties
- at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert
Avenue) on September 4, 1987.
ALL . INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions - or submit .evidence for or against the appli-cation
as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of
this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000
Main Street, Huntington- Beach, California, for inspection by the
public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By : . Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone ( 714) 536-5405
Dated 8/21/87 `7
- ( SEE MAP ON BACK)
PRECISE kN OF STREET ALIGNMENT .NC 37-2
A-_-
ALICaNMEtJ TJA 1- 'Z ` VE.
: - :.
-
Alv
t OR, .
2i -_ -
A�LQrYI
TARIO.
fWA
o— DEC on
�/ --
ALKRTA pq
_ 3_ TRAM0.1M - DR
j- ' TVKON OR
NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM aeG se,-Plan �� -(re .I fad r 4- No•E)7" 2
TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE:
FROM: wtwtuhi I�/ %�o►�rnel�-�
PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE
DAY OF Gjpn.lem bar 1987.
AP' s are attache
AP's will follow
No AP's
Initiated by:
Planning Commission
Planning Department
Petition IJ
* Appeal
Other
Adoption of Environmental Status (x)
IR CND NONE
Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO
informed of forthcoming public
hearing?
Refer to 1,0j_trI Ph' II'��s,, A�ssf. P16tnn.er, Planning Department - Extension #5271
for additional information.
* If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal .
IS THIS AN APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ? NA /
YES NO
PRECISE PLAIN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 87-2
f,a��►�E pl-AN OF -;naEET
AIL-IGNMEN Flo. '7- 2 Ave.
77
55
..
HAPPY
41L•..4.1�• _. �� :rLL
.
V
P.
- t i
N CF-R �• - ^_ �'
- — —.t on DR.
ONTARIO DR _ -WLfON
%of
J
Im
� O
.QUEEEC DR
i1r;Ft
R -- - - _ ALDERTA OR a
L- 1'V1cON oft lot
�S _7 —
Caroline Sprague Hill Edward BVAingame Malon E. Kincaid
7801 Lori Drive 18176 Sharon .',ine Rt 2 Box 255
HUntington Beach, CA 9k648 Huntington Brach, CA 92648 Denison, TX 75020
Natalie Hearn David L. Campbell
19451 Summer Breeze Lane 18172 Sharon Lane Robert King
Huntington Bea-,h, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 6881 Melbourne Drive
Huntington Beach, 0A 92647
Lee Kuen Chen James L. Johnson
4 Carder 18162 Sharon Lane Evelyn Shabo
Irvir:e, CA 92714 Huntington Bach CA 92648 231 1/2 S. Gale
Beverly Hills, 90211
Fred Gruenbaam. Mark G. Borgatta
1b171 Alice Lane 18146 Sharon Lane Jo Scott
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 13561 Beach Blvd.
Westminster, CA 92683
Steven Ekstedt Barbara Skinner George Knapp
7836 Connie Drive 7865 Lori Drive 650 Cordova Apt 12
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Pasadena, CA 91101
Paul Albert Stanley Jay Collins-Zweibel
7842 Conie Drive 7861 Lori Drive 231 1/2 S. Gale Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Oscar J. Rosales Thomas McKnight David Hammons
7846 Connie Drive 7855 Lori Drive 18201 Sharon lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92645
Robert Stellrecht Ted Noland David Ling
P.O. Box 1786 7851 Lori Drive 18205 Sharon Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92641
Rae Park Young Song Kwan Baek Huntington Village Estate
18212 Sharon Lane 7845 Lori Drive 17171 Beach Blvd.
Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 9264
92648
Leslie Haynes Nino Oscar
Thomas Ring
18202 Sharon Lane 7841 Lori Drive 1308 Shadow Oak Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Malvern, PA 19355
Resident Maclovio Aranda
18186 Sharon Lane 7862 Talbert Ave. Bank of America
HUntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 6004
Los Angeles, CA 90051
Daniel Lorca, Robert McClain De La Cuesta Re.,inald
7821 Connie Drive 8412 HurswellDrive 7811 Glencoe A-e. #1
Huntingtor Beach, CA 9Zb48 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Be<<.h, CA 926471
Hsu Hsueh Yung Michael Spencer Higman Anna H.
7815 Connie Drive 7816 Connie Drive P.O. Box 545
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Rosemead, CA 91770
David Crane Geraldine Imfeld Jim R. Cook
18176 Alice lane 7822 Connie Drive 18175 Alice Ln.
HUntington Beach, CA 92648 HUntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92641
Van Hang-Kit Amy Resident Alan W. Dollar
16942 Agate Circle 18201 Alice Ln.
18162 Alice Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92.649 Huntington Beach, CA 92644
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Jeff Swanson Wind River Trading Company Ten Berge Theodorus
18156 Alice lane 7962 loth Street, Ste 200 18205 Alice Ln.
Hunt :on Beach, CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 9264;11
Bino Kartsonakis Laszlo Hsu Mon Son
7822 Lori Drive 4645 E. Pacific Coast Hwy 11313 E. Ridgegate Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Long Beach, CA 90804 Whittier, CA 90601
Windward Cove Condominium Paul Weatherly Karl Seit
19 Corporate Plaza 7622 Talbert Avenue 8581 Larthorn Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660 HUntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92641
Thomas Gallagher Richard Palkovic
4921 Los Patos Ave. 7821 Lori Drive
HUntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 9264
� -
Resident Original Musical Instrume Despena Frudakis
7792 Connie Drive 18108 Redondo Cir. 71-54 170th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fresh Meadows, NY 11365
Catherine Lim Robert Islas
7802 Connie Brive - 9350 Grippo River Ave.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 927011
Matt Peasley Assigal Johann �v
7806 Connie Drive 16530 Daisy Ave. n O
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 QS \�
hesident Gerald Carbone
7826 Lori Drive 5111 Stallion Cii:cle.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Bea•:h, CA 92649
James Sommars Buddy H E Combest
7832 Lori Drive Rancho Los Palmos C C
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Myles O'Reilly
7846 Lori Drive
HUntington Beach, CA 92647
Max Benward
18175 Sharon Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Jack L. Grimes
18185 Sharon Lane
Huntington Beach, CA
92648
Michael Tedesco
18191 Sharon Lane
Huntington Beach, CA
92648
e \
/ Al
AVthtlrized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public
4 notices bli Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, PUBLIC NOTICE
Ca,Ifornia. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961, and f 1
A-24831. dated 11 June. 1963. NOTICE'bik
PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN
OF-STREET
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I NOTICE MT 86
S HEREBY
GIVEN that the Huntington
County of Orange Puboc Nonce Advertising covered Beach City Council will hold
by m affidavit is s in r point a public hearing In the Coun-
mt 10u pica column width cll Chamber at the'Hunt-
Ington Beach Civic Center, CI
2000 Main Street, Hunt r�'C
Ington Beach;California,on --
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the date a`nd at the time In- U� �•-
dicated betowito recelve and -` /0 C
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen conslder the statements of
all persons who wish to be I9 years, and not a party to or interested in.the below heard relative to the appli-
cation described below
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange DATE/TIME Monday,06-1
IT
Itober 6, 1986 710 PM g CL�k
Coast DAILY PILOT, with Which Is combined the ( APPLICATION--NUMBER:
Trecise Plan.of Street-Align-
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, 'ment 86-1-Areas A,C,D,E
and F
printed d published in the City of Costa Mesa, APPLICANT:CItyofHunt-
p an pu y Ington Beach
Count of Orange, State of California, and that a ':'LoQATION Walnut ge'
Y g enue�;NSlxth'..$treat;-Orange
PUBLIC HEARING Avenue and Lake Street as
Notice Of described In 'the iisquest!l
below.
-REQUEST:Precise Plan of
Street Alignment for A)
Walnut Avenue between
of which co attached hereto is a true and complete Street; Bi Ddf amend _Lake
PY p Sliest B).Deleted C)Sixthl
ficl
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Street between Pea_Ige
p ,Coast Hlghwey'�and:;Orange,
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Avenue;ra Sixth Street and.
p 9 Y tween Orange Avenue end
Lake'Street; E)Orange AV-1
Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna enue between Sixth street
and Third Street, and F)
Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME Lake'Street between Atlanta
Avenue and Pacific Coast.
c 9tYvY sn7 to wit the issue(s) of Highway.
ENVIRONMENTAL
STAT4S: These general
alignments were previously
adopted under Negative
Declaration No: 84-14 In
September 25 198 ( conjunction with Circulation
Element Amendment 84-1.
ON FILE:A legal descrlp-
tlon and a copy of the
198 proposed Precise Plan of
Street Alignmentis on file In
the Department of Develop-
merit Services, 2000 Mein
198 Street, Huntington Beach,
California 92648,for Inspec-
tion by the'pu6lic.
-ALL INTERESTED PER-
SONS are Invited to attend
said hearing 'and express
opinions or submit evldence
for or"against the application
198 as outlined above.All appll-
cations, exhibits, and de-
scriptions of this proposal
are on file with the Office of
the City Clerk; 2006 "Main
Street, Huntington Beach,
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the California,for Inspection the
public.
foregoing Is true and Correct. HUNTINGTON BEACH
CITY•COUNCIL=, By: Alicia
M. Wentworth, City Clerk,
Phone:(714)SU-5405
September 25 6 Published Orange Coast,
Executed on , 198 Delly Pilot September 25,1
Cos a Mesa, Calif rnia. I1986
i Th118�
1
Signature
�s aaa""
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
E RFC�Ip
4r e
October 5, 1986
Members of the Huntington Beach City Council
20001 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 yJ�
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT 1
I think most people would agree that the downtown area needs a rejuvinating and that there
are some great development possibilities to serve both visitors and residents.
But, once again I would like to voice::my dissapproval of the current high density and
street realignment proposal of the downtown redevelopment project.
It appears to me that the current project with the multi story high rise hotels, the
Seaside Village, the Main Street Mall, the street realignment etc is geared toward the
visitors only. The residential community will be at a great disadvantage. Some residents
will lose their property altogether, and certainly will..-not see the full value of it when
purchased by a developer or the City. Some will lose footage due to the street realignment.
Historical buildings will be torn down. Others will be impacted with traffic and parking
problems. I feel the project .needs further study to include the needs of-the residential
community in these plans also. Some of the areas that need further study are: street
realignment, location of traffic lights and stop signs to control traffic, bus routes,
parking structure locations, possibility of 1 way streets versus street widening, location
of entrances & exits to parking structures
I feel the density of this development is to large to be self supporting year round.
As a long time resident it does not require any great study to know that a high density
commercial does not have the market potential in downtown Huntington Beach. The past
evidence is Sea Cliff Village and. the: Huntington Inn. It does not have the traffic patterns
or easy access to freeways to support high density commercial.
My understanding, recently, is that the 'Old Civic Center Site, property would be developed
first in the old town area with commercial and residential. If that doesn't prove market-
able then something else would be done with the property on the other side of Main Street.
I don't like living across the street from the experiment. Also, I understand, that Main
Street would be closed at the 5th/6th street intersection which would impact 6th street'
with more traffic and have a negative effect on commercial property in the 1, 2, and 300
blocks of Main Street.
l/"
October 5, 1986
Page 2
I have been attending the City Council meetings and the Planning Commission meetings to
keep informed on this project.
I feel the Planning Commission is exercising a much needed caution lest the residents
will have to live with whatever white elephants are created by a hasty decision. More
time is needed t- consider the impact this redevelopment project will have on the whole
city.
I urge you to exercise the same caution.
Lois Freeman
415 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
REQUEA FOR CITY COUNCIL- ACTION
Date October 6, 1986
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratorg• �')f
. ,�P #0*-q
repared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development Services0Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 86-1 -
Consistent with Council Policy? 9�
(SQ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 86-1 is a request by the City
of Huntington Beach to establish a precise alignment of the
following adopted arterials: A) Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street
and Lake Street; B) Deleted; C) Sixth Street between Pacific Coast
Highway and Orange Avenue; D) Sixth Street between Orange Avenue and
Lake Street; E) Orange Avenue between Sixth Street and Third Street;
and F) Lake Street between Atlanta Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway.
RECOMMENDATION:
PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council adopt
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 86-1 by ordinance with the
inclusion of the exhibits and wording recommended by the Planning
Commission. Also, direct staff to immediately implement a study on
the impact of the Precise Plan of Street Alignment on existing bus
routes on Sixth Street, Lake Street and Orange Avenue.
Planning Commission action:
ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY PIERCE, PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT NO. 86-1 WAS APPROVED BY ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 1360 WITH
AMENDMENTS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Winchell , Pierce, Livengood, Porter, Erskine,
Mirjahangir
NOES: Rowe
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ANALYSIS:
The following precise plans of street alignments are proposed:
(A) Walnut Avenue between Sixth Street and Lake Street is being
precise planned to implement the Circulation Element
PIO 4/84
redesignation from local street ( 60 feet ) to a secondary
arterial ( 80 feet ) . The new alignment will ultimately require
10 feet of additional right-of-way on each side of the street
from Sixth Street to Lake Street and will feature a 12 foot
unraised median and 10 foot parkways .
(B) Deleted (The deletion of this item is explained on page three
of this report. )
(C) Sixth Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Orange Avenue is
being precise planned to implement the Circulation Element
redesignation from local street (75 feet) to primary arterial
(100 feet ) . The new precise alignment, however , will feature a
reduced width of 80 feet which will include a 12 foot median
and ten foot parkways.
(D) Sixth Street between Orange Avenue and Lake Street will be
connected with Fifth Street at the intersection with Main
Street. Though the Circulation Element identifies Sixth Street
north of Orange Avenue as a secondary arterial (80 feet ) it has
been determined that a reduced width would satisfy the
estimated demand, therefore, a right-of-way which varies from
77. 5 feet at the intersection of Sixth Street and Orange Avenue
to 80 feet at the intersection of Fifth Street and Main Street
is proposed. Most of the connection would be executed through
vacant land previously occupied by old City Hall .
(E) Orange Avenue between Sixth Street and Third Street -is being
precise planned to implement the Circulation Element
redesignation from local street (75 feet ) to primary arterial
(100 feet ) . The new precise alignment, however, will feature a
reduced width of 80 feet which will include a 12 foot median
and ten foot parkways .
Appropriate traffic control channelization and devices will
need to be incorporated into the design at the intersection of
Orange Avenue and Sixth Street to limit and discourage
vehicular travel from the downtown northwestward on Orange
Avenue into the townlot area .. Wording to this effect has been
included in Section 5 of the attached ordinance.
(F) Lake Street between Atlanta Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway is
being precise planned to implement the Circulation Element
designation of a primary arterial (100 feet) . Lake Street is
presently developed at a 75 foot width . This alignment of Lake
Street amends Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 84-2 which
was adopted October 15, 1984 . That plan established the
precise alignment of the Atlanta/Orange intersection and also
the take for right-of-way for Lake evenly on both sides of the
street. This amendment to that alignment retains the precise
alignment of Atlanta/Orange, but adjusts the right-of-way take
on Lake Street entirely from the vacant property on the east
side of the street.
RCA - 10/6/86 -2- (6308d )
i
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 86-1 has undergone considerable
review and revision since its first public hearing before the
Planning Commission on July 22, 1986 . The first revision was for
the deletion of Area B (Walnut Avenue between Lake Street and Beach
Boulevard) from the Precise Plan so that staff could work with the
property owners and assess alternative alignments . The Planning
Commission and staff were in agreement that this area be deleted
from the precise plan.
Staff also prepared street cross sections to indicate how the
arterials may be constructed to minimize impact on existing
structures . The maps (which are attached to the adopting ordinance )
.depict the existing street sections, interim sections which will
work until adjacent property recycles, and ultimate sections which
depict how the arterials will look after all of the property
recycles. The Walnut Avenue interim section proposes ten feet to be
taken only on the southwest side in conjunction with proposed
redevelopment projects . No dedication will be taken from the
northeast side until property recycles . The Orange and Sixth Street
interim sections propose all improvements to be made within the
existing right-of-way with only 2.5 feet of dedication to be
acquired as property recycles .
Also included is a conceptual rendering of how the intersection of
Walnut Avenue and Sixth Street may be treated if the Worthy house is
retained in its present location rather than relocated. The
rendering shows Walnut Avenue taking a 10 foot jog to the northeast
onto property occupied by an oil well in order to retain the Worthy
house at its present location.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Precise Plan of
Street Alignment with the condition that the renderings of interim
street sections and the Walnut/Sixth Street intersection be included
as exhibits in the adopting ordinance. That recommendation has been
incorporated into the attached ordinance for adoption.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The environmental impact of the proposed alignments was previously
assessed at the time of Circulation Element Amendment No. 84-1 .
Negative Declaration No. 84-14 was adopted by the City Council on
June 4, 1984. Environmental Impact Report 82-2 previously analyzed
the downtown arterials in conjunction with the Downtown Specific
Plan . No additional environmental assessment is .necessary.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The City Council may deny Precise Plan of Street Alignment No.
86-1 . Such action would prevent the City from implementing the
adopted arterial status of the streets covered by the Precise Plan
and would require that the City reassess its plans for the Downtown
area.
RCA - 10/6/86 -3- (6308d )
I/
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Area Map
2. Precise Plan Maps
3 . Ordinance ( Including street sections and Walnut/Sixth
intersection renderings )
4. Staff Report dated September 16 , 1986
5 . Staff Report dated September 9, 1986
6. Staff Report dated August 5, 1986
7. Staff Report dated July 22, 1986.
JWP:HS: kla
RCA - 10/6/86 -4- ( 6308d)
o4U \ ,.,y -fV ` ] CFC __ �r--iI•--i I k 1 v \<VE��FART FORD
`\ t `\
��� �.�• -L - __ GENEVA
\ ACACIA AVE.
OEM d
i� RAhAFORT
1 2 \- �\ _ ELMIRA AVE.
\\` ' _ 1ECAN-- AVE.
F'TDE�TROITT!'� < AVE
t \ CNICAGD
`5,/(/,,'"/�) �{�,•,\,\`\//� q \` `` Y __ CMICAGO O AV E- Q
mu
BAITIAIORE B;5
0
Elm
r`. -
\ ATLANTA
vti = I m'"
.V
,1
Q 4,� W
\
o
TEET
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNb?ENT 140. 86-1
MAMMA
HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA AREAS A,. B, C, D, E, AND F
PLANNING DIVISION
AREA A
Precise Alignment of Walnut Avenue.
Sixth Street to Lake Street
A strip of land 80.00 feet in width, the centerline being described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Walnut Avenue, a 60.00 feet wide
street, and the centerline of Sixth Street, a 75.00 feet wide street, as shown on the Map
of Huntington Beach, recorded in book 3 page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of
the County Recorder of Orange County, California; thence south 48o 40, east 1262.50
feet along the centerline of Walnut Avenue to a point on the centerline of Second Street,
a 60.00 feet wide street as shown on said map of Huntington Beach; thence continuing
south 480 40' east 317.50 feet along the southeasterly prolongation of the centerline of
Walnut Avenue, to a point on the centerline of Lake Street, a 75.00 feet wide street
(formerly First Street) as shown on said map of Huntington Beach, said point being the
terminus of the described centerline.
2-05
N.46 4o w. 4 I �` ---1,41 5o Cr.Zwp. —
WKLNQT
-� I
lob IOS �p4
IL- _ F- I �- z.
- -- r - ---- ID ------- L
?5I
—00
I '
I
I
>�CIFIC -g MkZT f iwy.
REVISIONS REFERENCES
WALNUT Wr 461
Kr'KLIGNMfNT
rKtZ'* MN4 NO
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH sxEErMa 1 os3
t - DDMM MEW OF RIBUC MONKS
AREA D-
Precise Alignment of Sixth Street.
Orange Avenue to Lake Street
A strip of land 77.5 feet in width, 37.5 feet northwesterly and northerly, measured at
right angles, from and 40.00 feet southeasterly and southerly, measured at right angles,
from the following described line.
Biginning at the intersection of the centerline of Sixth Street, a 75.00 feet wide street,
and the center line of Orange Avenue, a 75.00 feet wide street, as shown on the Map of
Huntington Beach, Main Street Section, recorded in book 3, page 43 of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California; thence north
410 20' east 195.00 feet along the centerline of Sixth Street to a tangent curve concave to
the south having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence northeasterly, easterly and southeasterly
along said curve, thru a central angle of 680 06' 27" an arc distance of 416.05 feet to a
tangent reverse curve concave to the north,having a radius of 350.00 feet; thence
southeasterly along said curve thru a central angle of 170 30' 38" an arc distance of
106.97 feet to its intersection with the centerline of Main Street, a 75.00 feet wide street
as shown on said Map of Huntington Beach, Main Street Section, said intersection being
the terminus of the 77.5 feet wide strip of land and said point also being the beginning of
an 80.00 feet strip of land the centerline being described as follows:
Continuing along the last mentioned curve easterly and northeasterly thru a central angle
of 190 46' 36" an arc distance of 120.81 feet to the centerline of Frankfort Avenue, (Fifth
Street); thence north 720 09' 13" east 224.24 feet to the centerline of Lake Street,
formerly Railroad Avenue, as shown on said Map of Huntington Beach, Main Street
Section, said intersection point being the terminus of the described centerline.
k!LL
'
_. . Z > �.
01
t I
ion z-w zs�� ion
L
Wit—+ `�
i I �
� r
'Z b� 41KEe(
('I'�R7hED yfI�E1 hEUfbN
REVISIONS REFERENCES 31XTN 3TRCTT O
p�LtdsNMl�NT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH wninl vl
O I I ro l ��
JI � oL�
GI i IL I j I ( �n
SIXTH U- 5T_ I
`y h sT R
OLOCK 505 k
t
1001 MLCCK I 4M
FIFTH i ✓._ , '"�'�"Q i
CD
ill w
1G
rA
I a L \ \
too
4S-�
\aLcicx 405
rR[L I3C -LNN NO
REVISIONS REFERENCES o FIFTr':% 5! . ri 5T_
fP�1-161 N MINT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHEET NO.: Of L
ucPru 7MM OF PUBLIC WOW
,f
� t•
t ,
AREA C
Precise Alignment of Sixth Street.
Pacific Coast Highway to Orange Avenue
A strip of land 80 :00'feet in width, the centerline being described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Sixth Street, a 75.00 feet wide street,
and the northeasterly right-of-way of Pacific Coast Highway, formerly Ocean Avenue, a
100.00 feet wide highway, as shown on the Map of Huntington Beach recorded in book 3,
page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County,
California; thence north 410 20' east 1245 feet, more or less, along the centerline of Sixth
Street to its intersection with the northeasterly line of Orange Avenue as shown on said
Map of Huntington Beach, said intersection being the terminus of the described centerline.
The property line radius for the southerly corner of Sixth Street and Orange Avenue shall
be 90.00 feet. At all other street intersections the corner properly line radii shall be
32.00 feet.
s wz
f; OIL 7.1NK3-
F
---- - ,n -------- --- ---- ---- O::WLL L3 F1 Cd U
0'
_I JEMOn
lu
_ -
i
K
EX;ST.O.' !KK NG
I.
(, T
-— --- --- ---- n -- ci
L �h
-- / - --- —- in --- - — N J
N
- -- b3 — ------- � - t.
`P
D. iJ�NI
REVISIONS REFERENCES
r,4 r+�uzE rl.nN no..—
} CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH "EETWo.t OF
m.nvr BF]WWIWUff OF PUBLIC WORKS
AREA E
Precise Alignment of Orange Avenue
Sixth Street to Third Street.
A strip of land 80 . 00feet in width, the centerline being described as follows: .
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Orange Avenue, a 75.00 feet wide
street, and the northwesterly right-of-way of Sixth Street, a 75.00 feet wide street, as
shown on the Map of Huntington Beach recorded in book 3 page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps
and as shown on the Map of Huntington Beach, Main Street Section, recorded in book 3,
page 43 of Miscellaneous Maps, all in the office of the County Recorder of Orange
County, California; thence south 480 40' east 1020 feet, more or less, along the centerline
of Orange Avenue to its intersection with southeasterly right-of-way of Third Street as
shown on said Maps of Huntington Beach, said intersecion being the terminus of the
described centerline.
The property line radius for the southerly corner of Orange Avenue and Sixth Street shall
be 90.00 feet. At all other street intersections the corner property line radii shall be
32.00 feet.
- -
405
4ot-
17
_ io '
01CP\NGE-- mi3-- - -- - - -- P\VeT1UC----f -----—
uo'305
.4o1
o'y Z4'
z
�7E nOH
NO tLf+f_
REVISIONS REFERENCES — OMNGC Wr O
-- AI,IF,�N M ANT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH am-al al
I
AREA F
Precise Plan
for
Lake Street
Pacific Coast Highway to Orange/Atlanta Connection.
A strip of land 100.00 feet in.width, the centerline being described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of a line that is parallel with and 50.00 feet southeasterly,
measured at right angles from the southeasterly line of Block 101 with the northeasterly
line of Pacific Coast Highway (formerly Ocean Avenue) a 100.00 feet wide street all as
shown on the Map of Huntington Beach, recorded in book 3, page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps
in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California; thence north 410 20'
east 1080 feet along said parallel line and its northeasterly extension to the terminus of
the described center line.
1010g
2 ND. STREET
I ol
LC)(:,K 101 MLOCK 101
IZ
--- / F- I ! I � i I I � I � /
cf)
:2!
1 -A
(D
LL i z
r 5
ILKK-613T. C.H. 70 N-._lNN7& W-167
NOT TO
REVISIONS REFERENCES
L
==F= L&K" 7. K!TT
"Mi"57 MNN CISKLION.V-7NT O
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH sUT OF
OFPMfYFM m PUBLIC.0 KS
Publish - 9/25/86
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 86-1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center,
2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time
indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish
to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE/TIME: October 6, 1986 - 7:30 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Precise Plan of Street Alignment 86-1 - Areas A, C,
D, E and F
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
LOCATION: Walnut Avenue, Sixth Street, Orange Avenue and Lake
Street as described in the request below.
REQUEST: Precise Plan of Street Alignment for A) Walnut Avenue
between Sixth Street and Lake Street; B) Deleted;
C) Sixth Street between Pacific Coast Highway and
Orange Avenue; D) Sixth Street between Orange Avenue
and Lake Street; E) Orange Avenue between Sixth
Street and Third Street, and F) Lake Street between
Atlanta Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: These general alignments were previously adopted
under Negative Declaration No. 84-14 in conjunction
with Circulation Element Amendment 84-1.
ON FILE: A legal description and a copy of the proposed
Precise Plan of Street Alignment is on file in the
Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by
the public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above.
All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with
the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California,
for inspection by the public. .
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone: (714) 536-5405
i R,R I : L_°�ILJ UIJ LJL 1 kR RI R I 10
emRI R I r N Jr l r. R2-P"
\ �'� -a PLAN( RICT TWO)I I I - _ I
' CF-R �� - = I
HE
I�
RI _
R I R I 2RP-� N. 1,71MIE
� E•v I R 3 I C 4
( RI RI " H
i�� , � RI R2 R I jI 11
2 � Ua �L LJa c
•srea►c. P R 2 R I. ' �L J ULJ �'I �E � EJ,'C
a _ I ( R3� R3^
` �i+T U
.gWA ; 1 _..
Awf
R3 R2 J 1•� I I < ,�
(V 7 1 1 oNE) a R3 R3 a R3 C
`Lr q R 3 R3 Un E,!!,rL. -,i EI'
>1
.�. Li
N 1 1.
' ECIFiC- A
T 3 (DISTRI T E
aEC?NI�1 �I
Jr 5` t
MH
r t �
R2-PD' j I 2
to i nz-ao-cz � m
---�I w
avE �:x N fR2-PO CZ
R2-CZ
rq /C\ o R2'PO-CZ: R2 PD-CZ
�7`k 4' -%{'j• `i. �t ,G� or�� -° i t G ;176"-f .._7r)/' YaR2y'-
/
.O So '• 1a � `s.!��.•aI[�"' J R2-PO-CZ
a 9i
M H-CZ.
WN S&;FIC Ftlr.IN
•fa ---- o
�OISTRICTuf;a ? R2-PO-CZ m
} { ;1 rocf ro•a
\ N ,�•1WI ^'^ yI I '.�u o Z
RZ-PD-CZ R2-PO-C
S 4
/ -ac/o/C .~���;i�• ST p Cra 1,,�' $ �'�. - • ., .:a•---:
�rcr R2-PD-CZ . R2 PD CI;
t�
"moo r -4<4 MH-CZ .y;..'..-.;
_R2-PO-CZ - 1
S / I
\ O.`?TR�TC''%. •f -Q DOWNTOWN SPECIRC PLAN-0 1 I�
`\ -\OISTRIqT 08D
Precise Plan of. Street Alignment No. 86-1
Areas A, C, D, E and F
huntington beach planning division
024-271-0
CI .937-1 -29
%
Pei key,. harles 6mpa'any untington Beach Gra'ndstaf f Ronald.
' 15052 Springdale St'
Hunt rigton Beach, CA 92648
Suite 0
HUntinqton Beach CA 92649.
024-205-05 .024-271-02
937 150-30
Stovall , H C
Huntington Beach Company- Wightman, Lois
948 11th Street
7801 Seabreeeze
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
I Huntington Beach, CA 92648
937-150-31
024-250-45 024-271-03 Bauer, Martin
Huntington Beach Company Huntington Beach, Company 8811 Cliffside Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
024-250-49 024-271-04 937-150-32
Kuniyuki , Ted
.WCity of Huntington Beach,
Huntington Beach Company 7791 Seabreeze Drive
P.O. Box 7611 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
San Francisco CA 94120
024-250-64 937-150-23 937-150-33
City of Huntington beach Roberts') Teri
11501 Brookhurst St. #200 Smith, lsadore7785 Seabreeze
Huntington Beach, 'CA 92648
Garden Grove, CA 92641
024-250-69 937-150-24 937-150-34
Huntington Beach Company Peters, Robert Osborn, Russell
535 W. 172nd Street P.O. Box 6839
Gardena, CA 90247 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-250-72 937-150-25 937-150-315
R & M Rohrs Brothers Mastrol y, Frank Wendt, Harvey
1511 E. Santa Clara Avenue 7831 Seabreeze Drive 7771 Seabreeze Drive
Santa Ana, CA 92701 Hutnignton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648
024-250-73 937-150-26 937-150-36
City of Hunt'ingn Beach O'Donnell , Edward
7825 Seabreeze Drive Wi I son, James
P.O. Box 190 7765 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach CA 92648 P Huntingn Beach, CA 92648
HUntington Beach, CA 92648
024-250-74 937-150-27 937-150-37
City of Huntington Beach Williams, Guy Giordano, Joseph
7821 Seabreeze Drive 6861 Sunview Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647
024-291-11 937-150-28
937-150-38
First American Trust Co. Chenel le, Rocky Williams, Ben
80 Huntington Street 1800 Half Road 18153 Brookhurst
Morgan Hill , CA 95037
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708
24-291-1 7-150-29 937-150-39
IT50 be
Urfs 1
L Giauffer, Margareth
lvek"618sAvenue 0treet
7745 Seabreeze Drive
Culver City, CA 90230
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
1A,
02 0
024-166-06 )24 170-10
Heim, Victor A.
.City hunt i ngton Beach Inc.Rad�I I Foods
16392 .'E. Heiin'Avenue
I -..Orange, Calif. 92665
024-166-07
024-170-11 _024-172--w 11
Madzoeff, _
Helen Huntington.' Beach,Company' Backlund ' Hertha
...,.
1714 Park Street.
P.O. Box -7611 . 27051. Hidden Trail Road
Huntingotn Beach, Ca 92648 San. Francisco, CA 94120 Laguna Hills, CA 92653
024-166-08 024-170-12 I 024-172-12
Randall Foods Inc.
Huntingotn Beach Company Associated Southern I nvestmer
7495 Arconda Avenue
Garden Grove, CA 92641
0
024-170-13 24-173-01
.024-166-09 Huntington Beach Company Huntington Beach Company
Randall Foods Inc.
024-170-14
024-173-02
024-166-10 Huntington Beach Company
Randall Foods Inc. Higgins, Eula
505 Lake Stret
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-172-03 024-173-03
024-166-11
McBeath, James Heim, Victor
Tubach, G. 19522 Westwinds
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
024-166-12 024-172-04 024-173-04
Tubach, Gwendolyn Besch, Dennis Koury, Robert
529 Lake Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-166-19 j 024-1.72-05 024-173-05
City of Huntington Beach Brewster, Virgil i Vozenilek, John
P.O. Box 185 2271 Pacific Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Costa Mesa, CA 92627
024-170-01 024-172-06 024-205-01
City of Huntingotn Beach Brewster, Virgil Mahood, Dennis
P.O. Box 691 -
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-170-02 024-172-07 024-205-02
City of Huntington Beach Zisakis, Phillip Moll ica, Angelo
16351 Tufts Lane -409 Alabama Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-170-08 024-172-09 024-205-03
-
Marchand, Leo Eun Gun Nicholson, William
S 526 Main Street,700 5th Street 407 Alabama Street
Huntington Beach. CA 92648 !
; -Huntinaton Beach. CA 92648
0?Jh J24=165 08 024-165-20 t
Squthwest Air Balance Allen,.' Robert ` Paterno, ,Tony
20701 Chaucer Lane t P.O. Box. 610 213 .2nd. Street
Huntingn Beach, Ca 92648 , -Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-164-10 �` 024-165-09 i 024-165 21. -
Ling, Carmel ' Johnson Roger .A
Derigo, Charles'. 9
5401 S. Mesagrove Avenue ! '219 Ind Street - -
Whittier, CA 90601 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-165-23
1- 024-165-10
024-164-11 �
Del I ano, David Susaeta, Richard Goodrich Robert
8412 Country Club Drive 1877 N. Nueva Vista Drive P.O. Box 363
Buena Park, CA 90621 La Habra, CA 90631 Huntington- Beach, CA 92648
024-164-13 024-165-11 024-165-25
:Taylor, Cynthia Susaeta, Richard Weiser, Joseph -
221 2nd Street
220 Via San Remo Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Newport Beach, CA 92663
024-164-14 024 165-12 024-165-26
Taylor, Cynthia Rinaldi , Angelo Hyman, Richard
P.O. Box 342 223 2nd Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-164-15 024-165-13 024-165-27
.Orange Coast Specialties Mason, Bernard Richonne, Marc D
825 12th Street 225 2nd Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-164-16 024-165-14 024-166-01
Orange Coast Specialties Mason, Bernard Randall Foods Inc.
2905 E 50th Street
Vernon, California 90058
024-165-02 024-165-15 024-166-02
Cather, Charles Doehme, Robert Randall Foods Inc
216 Walnut Street
Hunt ingtorBeach, CA 92648
024-165-03 024-165-16 024-166-03
Fel l i, Juho Mason, Bernard Randall Foods Inc
215 2nd Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-165-06 024-165-18 024-166-04
Watkins, Russel I B. Dav i de,. Dewey Randall Foods Inc.
9791 Ellis Avenue P.O. Box 342
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beac4 CA 92648
624-165-07 . i 024-165-19 024-166=05
Derigo, Joyce Hickman, Daniel Randall Foods
21 t Olive Avenue I 211 2nd Street
N,int i notnn Reach_ A ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1
t4.
024 a 62-20 v `
024-162-04 024=163 11
Redman, ;James
Galkin$ John Gardner, Richard
`:-43846 N Cedar
101 Huntington Street I 1896 Pacific .Apt. 'S02
Landcaster, CA 95384
Hunt i ngn Beach, CA 92648 San Francisco, CA 90241
-
024-162-21 -
024-162-05 j i 024-163-12
Palmer Paul
Donley, Mary , 1 Nelson; Allen
10067 Quain Street I. 14325 E. Flomar Drive I; 8404 Lexington Road
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Whittier, CA 90603 -=Downey, CA 90241
024-162-06 024-162-22
024-163-13
Donley, Mary Resendez, C. Nelson,, Allen
j P.O. Box 167
222 2nd Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-162-23 024-163-14
.024-162-07 Parnak i an, John
Donley, Mary 205 Lake Street Pease, harvey
P.O. Box 783
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 San Diego, CA 92112
024-162-08 024-162-24Vanian G 024-164-01
, enevieve
Cather, Charles Johnson, Hayward
2292 Long Beach Blvd. 2405 Kenikworth Avenue 730 14th Street
Long Beach, CA 90806 Los Angeles, CA 90039 Huntingn Beach, CA 92648
024-162-09 024-162-25 024-164-02
Cather, Charles Hunnicutt, Ray Bray Raymond
P.O. Box 134 8391 Hamden Lane
Homewood, CA 95718 Huntington Beach, CA 9264
024-162-12 024-163-01 024-164-03
Lindborg, Leonard City of Huntingotn Beach Deundian, George
17220 Newhope Street 317 2nd Street
Suite 127 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
024-162-13 024-163-02Hol werda Thom 024-163-04
, as
Wallace, G. Perry, Donald
ark Drive
80 California Street 6736 Hillp 313 2nd Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 Los Angeles, Ca 90068 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-163-03
024-162-16 024=163-05
Resendex, Carolyn Nelson, Norma White, Martha
114 Ocean Avenue
222 2nd Street 309 2nd Street
P.O. Box 167 Hutn i ton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-1b3-08
024-162-17 024-164-07
Ling, Carmel Orange Coast Specialty Niccole, Dennis
5404 Mesagrove Avenue 400 3rd Street
Whittier, CA 90601 Huntington Beach,. CA 92641
i
024-162-19 024-163-10 , -024-164-08
De Lapp, Gordon Spar, Al ice
320 Joliet Street 951 Hamilton Avenue Mauri , 'Joseph
119 Via Toluca
14aintintnn Reach. CA 92648 Palo Alto, CA. 94301 San Clemente, CA 92672
7-.7
024-.153.-12 -03 024-11.6
Gosney,'. 'Jack' .Aay
or, .: arge. . Niccde, 'Mieh e e
P.0. Box 23 ,,0Vii .San Remo 400'.3rd Street
Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Newport.* Beach, CA 926653 1 Hunti.hg'ton, Beach, CA 92648
024-153-13 024-160-01
02A�-154-05
Lindley, 6 Thomas Palladino, Rita
P.O. Box 2328
Tubach., G.. 400 S.--.Mariposa Apt. ?A
-
Oakhurst, CA 92.644 33516 Couser' Canuon Rd'.Valley Center, CA 92802 Los, Angeles, CA 90020
024-153-14 024-161-06
024-154-06
Abdel mut i I A. Kennedy, Daniel
Davis, Stephen
101 MainStreet 1 311 Wai nut Avenue 18092 Newmoon Lane
Huntingn Beach, CA 92648 Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-153-15 024-161-07
024-154-07
.iAbdelmuti , A. Gates, Clyde Dart, Fletcher
823 Westbourne Drive 310 2nd Street
Los Angeles, CA 90069 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-161-11
024-153-16 024-154-08
Terry, Robert Assistance League of HB Parnakian, Dorothy
320 2nd Street
301 Walnut Street H
Huntingotn Beach, CA 92648 untingotn Beach, CA 92648
024-161-12
024-153-17 024-154-09 Deundian, George
Draper, Eleanor Zeidan, Adel 317 2nd Street
121 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-153-18 024-154-10 024-161-13
Casta, Carlos Zeidan, Adel Kennedy, Daniel
16361 Del Mar Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 9264.9
024-153-19 024-154-11 024-161-14
Randall Foods Palladino, Alfred
Abdel mut i I A.
2905 E 50th St. 10 E Huntington Drive
113 Main Street
Vernon, CA 90058 Arcadia, CA 91006
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-154-12 024-162-01
024-153-20
Tubach, G. Smith, Elsie
Abdelmuti , A.
23571 El Cerrito
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
024-154-13 024-162-02
024-154-01
Tubach, G. Tomkins, Harold
Zeidan, Adel
231 Lake Street
18382 Patterson Lane #4
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Huntingn Beach, CA 92646
024-154-02 024-160-02 024-162-03
Sara.bere, C. j.',Trainer,. Ben. 1 Tomkins, Harol d
6772 Presidente Drive
.14tintinaton Beach. CA 92648
^ -•'S-lSI..�.�� _ 4 ^"^>vr�-..•_. _
7.
.' 024 1-51 01 024-151-26 024-152 12
Smith, Robert : r } Horem j an:, Ardem Sarrabere, Charles
2015E Ocean Blvd. 413 Woodbury ,Road '201 'Sth Street '` sn
Al tadena- CA 91001 i t:
Balboa, CA 92661 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
�.-
024-151-02 - 024-151-27 024152-13
Aqui , Charles Yen, John Chin=Jin I City - of Huntington Beach
16221 Bear Creek Lane 18486 Mt. Stewart_ Circle
Cerritos, CA 90701 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 j
024-151-03 � 024-151-28 - -- ------- - 024-153-01 ------------- - -------------�-
Klinchuch, John Sav-mor OiI Company Terry,. Robert
2744 Ashwood Street 5150 Wilshirte Blvd. 122 5th Street
Orange, CA 92655 Suite '100 . Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Los Angeles, CA 90036
024-151-05 024-151-29 024-153-02
Ashoka Investments . Sav-Mor Oil Company Terry, Robert
129 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 .
024-151-06 024-152-01 024-153-03
Asperen, Robert W. Worthy, Norman Terry, Robert
121 6th Street 801 13th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-151-07 024-152-02 024-153-04
Magno Properties Tharp, Stanford Terry, Dorothy
James Snelling 1321 Riverside 8877 TUIare Dr. #E31 1
7712 Rhine Drive Burbank, CA 91506 Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
024-151-08 024-152-03 024-153-05
Rhee, Choong Energy Development Corp. Mase, Ronald
6071 Manorfield Circle 400 S. Beverly Dr. Ste 315 4018 A Chandler Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Santa Ana, CA 92704
024-151-09 024-152-04 024-153-07
Rhee, Choong Conley, John Mulligan, Gary
117 The Masters Circle 211 Main Street
Costa Mesa, California 92627 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-151-10 Sexton, Francis 024-152-05 i 024-153-08
6716 Foster Bridge Blvd. Shupe, Margaret Fifthian, Stephen
Bell Gardens, CA 90201 333 Civic Center Dr. West 1221 Coast Highway #426
Santa Ana, CA 92701 Newport Beach, CA 92660
024-151-20 024-152-06 024-153-10
Ki tab j i an, Johnny Omomundro, Stuart City of Huntington Beach
2435 Bella Vista 8070 Langdon Avenue #106 -
Vista, -CA 92083 Van Nuys, CA 91406
024-151-25 I - 024-153-11 ...
Bogosian, John 024-152-10 Bagstad, Eldon
2475 QueensberryRoad Cracchiolo, -
901 .Catalina Avenue
Pasadena CA 91104.
19712 Quiet Bay lane
41.�r.rinaton -beach. Ca. 92648 Seal .Beach, CA 90740
Z FF7�
7-42
024-1147'-A5 1-4 7
.............
-148-08
feb:e" Jo
hn Wulr2l as r i - �Jo :_
Koury, Robert-
N.' Camdeh,:Drive
Beverl y Hi I I s CA 90212
-09- 024-14.8.
024-147-34
024-147-23 Koury,. Robert
Cooper, Pauline ; Terry, Elmyra
213 Main Street 122 5th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunti'ngton Beach, CA 92648
024-147-24 024-1147-w-35 024-1-48-10
Furman, Calvin Taylor, Oscar Koury,. Robert
81-730 Highway Ill 220 Via San Remo
Indio, California 92201 Newport Beach, CA 92683
024-147-25 024-147-36 024-148-11
Teberg, John Orange Coast Specialties Pacific Southwest Realty
211 Main Street Project 2 P.O. Box 2097 Term Annex
Huntington Beach, CA 91648 c/o Roem, John Los Angeles, CA 90051
636 E. Chapman Ave. Ogg', CA -
024-147-26 024-148-01 024-148-12
Caverly, Thomas Shandrick, Sylvia Niccole, Dennis
553 Temple Hills Drive 228 -1 Main Street 400 3rd Street
2
Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-147-27 024-148-02 024-148-14
Caverly, Thomas Koury, Robert Koury, Robert
024-147-28 024-148-03 024-148-15
Decker, Marjorie Koury, Robert Koury, Robert
Apt. G-214
8877 Lauderdale Ct.
Huntingn Beach, CA 92646
024-147-29 024-148-04 024-148-16
Wullner, Susan Koury, Robert Tahmissian, Paul
355 Vista Baya 1264 E Sonoma Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660 Altadena, CA 91001
024-147-30 024-148-05 024-148-19
Gallegos, William City of Huntington Beach, Shandrick, Sylvia
024-147-31 024-148-06 024-148-20
City of Huntington Beach Koury, Robert Hine, Frances
.1123 10th Street
.Santa Monica, CA 90403
024-147-32 02 4-148-07 024-148-21 Pacific S.W. Real
.
-Trainer, -Ben. Koury, Robert
. 2434 Leavenworth Street
San Francisco- CAP 94133
7
Barnes,.` Walter Pete�s John Lu, James
202 7th Street 222 7th. Street.t. 71 Ma orf i 61 d Dri ve'
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntingotn Beach CA 92648., _Hutnigriton. Beach, CA 92648
. .........
024-146-01.
024-145-20 024-146-15
Van Thiel J. Beal ,- Barbara Williams '-Jerry C
13621 Cedarcrest Lane -'..j._.`:2100 Old Quarry Road
Apt. 98E .9902 Maritime Lane
...Riverside, CA 92506 .'Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Seal Beach, CA 90740'
024-145-21 024-146-02 024-1477 01
Stocker, Francis Scott, Ruby
Burnes, Caroline
10241 Camden Cir. 7821 Talbert Avenue 9200 Westminster Ave. #90
Villa Park, CA 92667 i Hunt ingn Beach, CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92683
924-145-22 Fox, Terri I 1 024-146-03
024--147-03
208 7th Street Tater, William Burris, David
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 10062 Merrimac Drive 220 5th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, -CA 92648
024-145-23 024-146-05 Miller, Artalee 024-147-03
McRoberts, John 199 N El Camino Real Burris, David
206 7th Street Suite 143F 220 5th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Encinitas, CA 92024 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-145-24 024-146-06 024-147-05
Salerno, Daniel Briggs, James Gallegos, William G
214 7th Street 14312 Willow Lane 210 5th Street
Huntingotn Beach, CA 92648 Tustin, CA 92680 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-145-25 024-146-07 024-147-08
Peterson, John Williams, Jerry Wullner, Susan R
817 Caminito Del Sol 19902 Maritime Lane 355 Vista Baya
Carlsbad, CA 92008 Huntingotn Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 92660
024-145-26 024-146-09 024-147-09
Gourley, Robert Wood, Blanche i Lindborg, . Leonard
2201 Cielo Place 201 5th Street
17220 Newhope Street
Arcadia, CA 91006 Huntingn Beach, CA 92648 Suite 127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
024-145-27 024-146-10 024-147-10
Kotsch, Natalie Wood, Blanche Shandrick, Sylvia
218 7th Street 228 i Main Street
Hun'tingotn Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-145-28 024-146-12 024-147-11
Myhra, Douglas Teberg, John Assistance League of
212 7th Street h -P.O. Box 270 Huntington Beach
Huntington .Beach i.rj,.-,301 Walnut Street
CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Huntingn' Beach, CA 92648
-145-29 024-146-13 024-147-14
Kotsch,• Natalie
_924 La.ngevin, Douglas
"
...:T.eberg, John.
8196 Pawtucket Drive
Wiintinntnn Reach.. CA 92646
024-142-22 r '124-143-25 024-t44-14'
Morrgw,'.kahn'C a=; ity of -Huntington Beach, Teberg, John 'A
P.O. Box 2784 26133 Hatmor Drive
Seal Beach, CA 90740 a 1 Cal abasa,.- CA 91302
024-143-01 I� 024-144-01- 024-145-08
Shandrick,;' Sylvia
L.=Parnakian, .Val,antine ! Hillis, Dennis
228 i Main Street 312 Chicago Ave. .607 .01 ive Avenue
Huntin ton Beach CA 92648 I:.Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
9 ,
024-144-02 024-145-09
143-04 City Hicks, Everett Sarrabere, Charles
City of Huntington Beach - P.O. Box 310 201 5th- Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA
92648
024-144-03 024-145-10 10L3� a�
g24--143-09 v�f v
Hicks, Everette I Larson, Paul a
James, Bel-le
p gZia
P.O. Box 3576 8461 Poe Drive `►CP
Carmel , CA 93921 Huntington Beach, CA 92646
024-144-04 024-145-11
024�143-10 United States of America Post Vernon, Alfred
Pacific Heritage Land Office Building 4165 Candleberry Avenue
305$ 44th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Seal Beach, CA 90704
Vernon, CA 90058
024-143-11 024-144-10 024-145-12
Koury, Robert Parnakian, V Cade, Merle
024-143-12 024-144-11 024-145-13
Bank, Crocker National Dubov, Leon King, Joan
20222 Deervale Lane 536 S Olive
Tax Dept. Huntington Beach, -CA 92646 Denver, CA 80224
79 New Montgomery St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
024-143-19 024-144-12 024-145-14
Koury, Robert I Ohmann, Adolf Howe, .0 D
4134 Palmero Drive
303 3rd Street 4238 Locust Avenue
i
Los Angeles, CaA 90065 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Long Beach, CA 90807
024-143-20 0 4-14_7r13 024-145-16
Koller, James Ki Joan Borg, Randolph
16001 Galantine Lane 536-5 Way 224 7th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Den , C 80224 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-143-23 024-10--14 024-145-18
City of Huntingn Beach Bird, Michael
520 Meadowv i ew Drive
La Canada, CA 91011
024-143-24 024=144-13
City of Huntington Beach McCalIen, Marcus
►. .: 2 s 1 3-c-o s t a-Be 11 a 'd.ab'f 8
El Tor o,CA 92630
v .
024-141-02 024. 141=15 024=142-08 � T
KauF,;. Asa nyiolph ' erki:ns,y, Buck „ x .Battaglia, Richard `-
11821 Morgan Lane 308 Zth 'Street 21062 Brookhurst' St. #208
Garden Grove, CA 92640 i Huntington Beach, :CA V,,Hunungton Beach, -CA 92646
024-141-03-
Swaim, Michael 024-141=16 024-142-09 Lonava Inc
19524 Sequoia Avenue " Mola., Frank. I. P.O._.Bok:.4830
Cerritos, CA 92640 L8072 Adams Avenue Long Beach, CA 90804
�. Huntington Beach, CA 92646
024-141-04 024-141-17 i
Feemster, 011ie Perkins, Stephen 024-142-10
P.O. Box 2724 310 7th Street Gonzales, Gregory
Anaheim, CA 92804 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 2784
Sea l Beach, CA 90740
024-141-05 024-141-18 024-142-12
lNoodington, chtheline Fowler, Mark Tater, William
312 7th Street 307 6th Street 10062 Merrimac Drive
Hun t i ton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington i n ton Beach CA 92648 Huntington n ton Beach CA 92646
j 9 , 9
024-141-07 024-141-19 024-142-13
McCay, Nancy Allen, Robert Cade, Merle
302 7th Street P.O. Box 610
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
t
024-141-08 024-142-01 024-142-16
Galitzen, Donald Bailey, Mary Carlene Fifth Street Devt. Ltd. Pt.
9770 James River Circle 232 Crest Avenue Suite 200
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Two Corporate Plaza
Newport Beach, CA 92660
024-141-09 024-142-02 024-142-17
Runk, Robert Cade, Merle Diry, George
3 Macon 6331 Bolsa Avenue P.O. Box 116
Irvine, CA 92714 Midway City, CA 92655 Douglas, AR 99824
024-141-10 024-142-18
024-142-09 Fifth Street Investment
Pederson, Robert Cade, Merle
38726 Carolside Avenue 706 W Balboa Blvd.
Palmdale, CA 93550 Balboa, CA 92661
i
024-141-11 024-142-04 024-142-19
Youndsma, Peter Cade, Merle Guenther, Tony
4340 Tulane Avenue 308 6th Street
Long Beach, CA 90808 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-141-12 024-142-05 024-142-20
Niccole, Dennis j Fahrenkrug, Harry .. Matthews, Douglas
400 3rd Street j 29 Countryside Box 471. i .306 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _ Treynor, lA 51575 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-141-14 i -.024-142-06 i 024-142-21
'Harb, Majid Wood, Ronald Gonzales,. Gregory
.327-_11th. Street I `19681 Quiet .Bay Lane " P.O. Box 2784
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 .:-Huntington Beach; CA 92648 1 Seal Beach, CA 90740 .
-
Church, Community, Bible Koury, Robert { _.Jurkovich`, B M
of Hunti•ngto6'-.Beach
P.O. Box 609
H_u_ntingbtn _Beach.- CA 92648 _-- --j -_ -- --- ---
024-133-01 - 024-134-01-- - -- - 02/a-134 12 J
Mola Development Corp. Fox, .James Riley i Sarrabere, Charles .
B072 Adams Avenue
11783 Eton :Drive - 201 5th . Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Grand Terrace, Ca. 92324 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-133-02 024-134-02 024-134-13
Mola Development Corp. Mola Development Corp. Cade, Merle
215 loth Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-133-03 024-134-03 024-134-14
Tovatt, Anthony Beck, Mery iI Koury, Robert
19515 Starfish Lane 8491 Atlanta Avenue P.O. Box 65116
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Hunt i gnton Beach, CA 92646 Los Angeles, CA 90065
024-133-04 024-134-04 024-134-15
Love, Patrick Mandic, Robert Mandic, Robert P.
8331 Bol sa Avenue 12689 Lanak i 1 a Lane 12689 Lanak i I a Lane
Midway City, CA 92655 Garden Grove, CA 92641 Garden Grove, CA 92641
024-133-05 024-134-05 024-134-16
Love, Patrick Mandic, Robert Orens, Andrew
207 Appletree Avenue
Camarillo, CA 93010-.
024-133-06 024-134-06 - 024-134-17
Mola Development Corp. Cavic, Branko Orens, Andrew
410 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-133-08 024-134-07 024-134-18
Collins, Elizabeth Cavic, Branko Orens, Andrew
257 S. Westlake Avenue
i
Los Angeles, CA 90057
024-133-09 024-134-08 024-134-19
Lengsfeld, Manfred Cavic, Branko. Wickstrom, Thomas
P.O. Box 3555 20522 Salt Air Circle
Tustin, CA 92681 Huntington Beach., CA 92646
i
024-133-10 024-134-09 024-134-20
Edwards,* John i Jurkovich, B -M Ogden, Eddie
232 .Pomona _ Avenue_. I i 1832 Main Street
Long Beach, CA 90803 - I _ Huntington Beach., CA 92648
024-133-11. 024-134-10 024-141-01
"Koury, .Robert'. Jurkovich, B M Gregory, Mi Ine
P.O Box 65176
4817e Hayter Avenue._
Los , CA 90065 : a r Lakewood, CA:.90712;
, Angeles
y�c .a-:a.; _ . T "�...s.,_.� .vim-t .k a... .Y _ .t-[:"^,•r �..- - .is.: ..u, � ,,,.;:,;..--+o..,---a -
9137 )37 11
-40-146,
..3cha Pau
Sch ac tee -,Nancy
�4826 r,0 z
1741 ':Sieb�e�eze bri ve
Hu
"Huntington- Beach, -CA 926
Huntington n gto-4 n' ..6each-,`-`CA.-92648
48
931-150-41 1937-150-52
J.
.Hendrickson James j-.-.Gustaf!96n'. ;-John''A.
7742. Seabreeze Drive '7806 Seabreeze
�6ze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington .Bea-c h, CA 92648
937-150-42
937-150-53
Grmol yes, Nicholas
7746 Seabreeze Drive
Gustafson, John
7816 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CA. 92648
937-159"43 Hutington Beach
937-150-54
Cartier, Charles Medhat
Amr,
7752 Seabreeze Drive 1101 Newcastle Lane
Huntington BVeach, CA' 92648 Fullerton, CA 92633
937-150-44
937-150-55
Ray, Douglas 1 Ray, Robert
6051 Littlefield Drive 7826 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach Ca 92648
937-150-45
Chu, Franklin 937-150-56
7762 Seabreeze Drive Beyer, George
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1130 Somera Rd.
Los Angeles, CA 90077
937-1-50-46 937-150-57
Seacoast Village
7766 Seabreeze Drive
Valcarcel , Tony 8672 Franciscan Circle
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646
937-150-47
937-150-58
Nash, Morton
Warren, Donald
16202 Culpepper Cir.
7842 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92647! Huntington Beach, CA 92648
937-150-48
Nakagawa, Gene
7782 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
937-150-49
Wexler, Martin
. 7786 Seabreeze Drive
Hunti'n'gton Beach, CA 92648;'
e-e
937-150-50
.: Manley, Richard
;,7792 Seabreeze Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92648'
024-130-01 =: 024-1:31-15.
Citq- of •Huntington Beach erigo, Lewie , 024 1s2 d5 t
�07 Main Street'
Oubay;u Julie
NZ i' Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 410 :?th. 'Street _ R
Huntin"gton Beach, CA';�
-- - - - - -
024-130-02- - r:
024 131-16 024-132-06
City of Huntington Beach i I
Rinaldi, Angelo Warner, Marcia Charolotte;.
P.O. Box .342 P.O. Box 5695
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I Huntington Beach, CA 92615
024-131-17
024-131-04 I
Hand, Richard Wilson, May Beulah Iverson, C L
516 7th Street 501 6th Street 402 7th Street
Huntington Beach, _-CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA
j 92648.
024-131-05 ! 024-132-08
024-131-18
Cure, Harold Heim, Hattie Iverson, C L
515 9th Street 16392 E. Heim Avenue
Huntington Beach,_ Ca 92648 Orange, CA 92665.
024-131-06 024-t31-19 024-132-09 George, Virginia
423 6th Street
Phillips, Eddie Waite, Sally D. Rains Huntington Beach, CA 92648
510 7th Street 74-085 Quail Lakes Drive
Huntington Beach, California Indian Wells, CA 92210
92648
024-131-07 024-131-20 024-132-10
Hall Patricia Mack, Gary Easterly, Rebecca
605 7th Street 520 7th Street 305 N. Sweet Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fullerton, "California 92633
024-131-08 024-131-21
024-132-11
Whitfield Irene
Treadwell , Harry Bailey, Neale 417 6th Street
506 7th Street 518 7th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-131-09 024-132-01 024-132-12
Shaw, Thomas ! McCormick, John Freeman, Lois
5047th Street 8132 Sterling Avenue 415 6 th Street
Huntington Beach, .CA 92648 ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntiton Beach, CA 92648 r
024-131-10 024-132-02 024-132-13
Brown, Lois
Tharp, Mary Jane Wolfe, Loretta
19291 Surfdale Lane 422 7th Street ! 411 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
024-132-03 Delmar, Richard . `-' 024-132-14y
024 131-11 8579 Trinity River. Cir Patchen, Betty ..
Brown Lois 3761 S. Barrin ton: Ave .411 .
t. Hunfington Beach, -Calif � ,� g
92708 '_ + Los Angeles, CA 90066
024-131-12 024-132-04 1024-132-15,
Rosales Oscar r Y C -Lockett,- Irene C. , empniak : Henry
7846 Connie Drive °z . _� �t
41? 6th Street 1583 W.' Tonia gin._
Huntington Beach; CA 92648 Huni�ngton Beach, CA 92648 �� x, '� Anaheim, CA 92802r
n
i-=r �...._,..V—..�.....s.' .ram �l •.��aFa..Y ��n. _ ...'.(.. .. - _ 'S -t...'i+' �i 4._. Y- . �. .. Ic i
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public
notices by Decree of the Superior Court Orange County ..M..W...�
California Number A 6214 dated 29 September
mber 1961 and
A 24831 dated 11 June 1963
STATE OF CALIFORNIA _
County of Orange P bloc Notice Advertising co erect
by this '"Idev I is smice wW in7 point 7)7+tltnt0 D th71
Q
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid I am over the age of eighteen PUBLIC NOTICE
years and not a party to or interested in the below NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
entitled matter I am a principal clerk of the Orange PRECISE PLAN
OF STREET
Coast DAILY PILOT with which is combined the ALIGNMENT NO 852 V
NOTICE IS HEREBY
NEWS PRESS a newspaper of general circulation GIVEN that the Huntington
Beach hold
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa a public hearriingInitheiCourt
col Chamber at the Hunt
County of Orange State of California and that a
ington Beach Civic Center
Notice Of PUBLIC HEARING 12000 Main Street Hunt
ington Beach California on
the date and at the time in
,dicated below to receive and
consider the statements of
all persons who wish to be
heard relative to the appli
Of which cop
y attached hereto is a true and complete cation described below
DATE Monday March 17
copy was printed and published in the Costa Mesa '1986
1 TIME 7 30 P M
Newport Beach Huntington Beach Fountain Valley ( IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER Precise Plan of
Irvine the South Coast communities and Laguna Street Alignment No 85 2
LOCATION Gothard
Beach issues Of Said newspaper for 1 i me Street between McFadden
Avenue and Center Drive
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of PROPOSAL A request by
the City of Huntington Beach
to move the center line of
Gothard Street eastward
approximately 250 feet for
the portion of Gothard which
March 6 6 extends 600 feet south of
198 McFadden Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS Negative Declar
ation No 85 72 will also be
198 considered in conjunction
with Precise Plan of street
alignment No 85 2
ON FILE The proposed
198 plan and a legal description
is on file with the Depart
�ment of Development Ser
198 lvices 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach Cali
fornia 92648
ALL INTERESTED PER
SONS are invited to attend
19f3 said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence
for or against the application
las outlined above All appii
cations, exhibits and de-
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the are pions of this proposal
are on file with the Office of
foregoing is true and correct the City clerk 2000 Main
Street Huntington Beach
California for inspection by
the public
March HUNTINGTON BEACH
Executed on 7 6 CITY COUNCIL By Alicia
1 1 98 _ M Wentworth City Clerk
at Costa Mesa, California Phone(714)5WS405
Dated March 3 1986
Published Orange Coast
(Daily Pilot March 6 1986
Th 712
Signature
S
REQUES , FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
RH 86-33
Date May 9, 1986
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City A.dministra `
Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopmen CO lt4
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-72/ T)SY G1�Y �p
Subject: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 YyROyE 1�
A
i GTZ
Consistent with Council Policy? D4 Yes [ ] New Policy or.Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Ac ` s, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
At the City Council meeting of March 17, 1986 the Council considered Negative
Declaration No. 85-72/Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 (Gothard Street).
Council continued this item and requested staff to provide additional information
regarding costs, financing, participating agencies and funding for the project in ten to
fifteen years.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Precise Plan of Street Alignment No.
85-2 by adopting the attached Resolution and Ordinance after certifying Negative
Declaration No. 85-72 and authorize staff to plan for the purchase of needed
right-of-way and obtain needed easements for the realignment of Gothard Street
between McFadden Avenue and Center Drive.
ANALYSIS:
The purpose of this report and analysis is to provide Council with new information not
provided in the report that was presented *to Council at the March 17, 1986 Council
meeting.
Attached is a copy of a. letter from Cal Trans District Director Donald L. Watson to
Assemblyman Frizzelle. Mr. Watson stated in the letter that Cal Trans has no
objections to the Huntington Beach proposal of extending Gothard Street either by
utilizing the railroad opening under the freeway or by constructing a new overcrossing
providing all Cal Trans standards are met.
A meeting was held with the Westminster Deputy City Administrator, Planning
Director, and Public Works Director. Attached is a letter from Westminster dated
April 1, 1986. The letter states among other things that the Westminster Council has
referred the Gothard-Hoover connection to their Traffic Commission for study. As of
this writing the Traffic Commission has not begun to study this matter because of other
priorities. The letter also noted that although the Gothard-Hoover connection is shown
on the Westminster General Plan it is not on the Official Street and Highway Map of
the City of Westminster. In order to have the Gothard-Hoover extension eligible for
grant funds administered by OCTC the County's Master Plan of Arterial
P10 5/85
RH 86-33
May 9, 1986
Page Two
Highways (MPAH) needs to be amended. In order to apply for an MPAH amendment
both Westminster and the City of Huntington Beach need to amend their
Circulation/Official Street and Highway Map to show the connection between Hoover
and Gothard and a possible interchange.
Our Public Works Director received a letter from the Orange County Transportation
Commission dated April 18, 1986 which is attached to this report. The four key points
suggested by OCTC for consideration by the City of Huntington Beach are:
1. The need for an amendment to the County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) and the Circulation Elements of the cities of Huntington Beach and
Westminster - Currently, the County's MPAH does not show a connection between
Gothard Street and Hoover Street or an interchange with the San Diego Freeway.
Jerry Bennet or Bob Peterson from the County should be contacted regarding an
amendment.
2. A financial plan for designing and constructing the improvements - A plan
addressing the funding sources for the project should be prepared. It is assumed
that local funding (public/private) would be the primary source.
3. The role of Cal Trans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on the
project - Cal Trans and FHWA are responsible for approving any connections to the
interstate system. Their involvement early in the process is important.
4. An agreement with the City of Westminster - The Gothard/Hoover Street
interchange affects both the City of Westminster and Huntington Beach.
Concurrence on the proposed project is essential to its success.
Staff would like Council to know that potential on and off ramp connections to I-405
would be a long range proposition.
Financing the Gothard Street realignment, extension of Hoover and addition of an on
and off ramp can be obtained from tax increment which can be combined with possible
funding with from Gas Tax, FAU, and AHFP. Conservative estimates of tax increment
over the life of the project show an estimated net of $19 million available for projects,
after all existing obligations have been subtracted. Cost estimates in 1986 are provided
for. preliminary planning purposes. There are numerous issues that could impact the
costs involved. Some of these issues are configuration and location of an on/off ramp,
configuration of a roadway to go over or under the freeway, future railroad plans,
future plans of Southern California Edison relative to transmission lines and towers and
the increased traffic flow on Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest.
RH 86-33
May 9, 1986
Page Three
Cost of Gothard Realignmerit South of McFadden
The cost of right-of-way for the Gothard realignment south of McFadden is estimated
at $480,000. Construction of the actual roadway, which is not necessary at this time .
and may occur anytime over the next several years, is estimated to cost $540,000. The
total cost is estimated at $1,020,000. If building is allowed to occur, an additional
$500,000 is estimated for acquisition bringing the total cost of the project to $1,520,000.
Cost of Gothard-Hoover Extension North of McFadden to Bolsa
The estimated cost of the right-of-way is $2,080,000 and this right-of-way would be
from the railroad and Edison Company. Right-of-way is not needed from Land School,
which is in the Westminster School District. Appropriate environmental mitigation
measures would also be implemented to eliminate possible negative impacts to the
school and residential area.
In the future, when construction of this portion of roadway takes place the cost is
estimated at $800,000. In terms of the improvements such as on and off ramps that
may be constructed in the future staff's analysis is that projected tax increment from
the project as well as additional transportation funding sources will place these
improvements well within the economic ability of the City/Agency to fund.
FUNDING SOURCE:
The funding source for the Gothard realignment south of McFadden will be from the
Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Project and from
transportation grant sources that this project would qualify for.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
An alternative action would be not to approve the negative declaration/precise street
alignment. This alternative could lead to greater costs for the proposed
Gothard-Hoover extension and delay completion.
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Cal/Trans letter dated March 10, 1986.
2. City of Westminster letter dated April 1, 1986.
3. OCTC letter dated April 18, 1986.
4. Council packet dated March 17, 1986.
5. Southern Pacific Transportation letter dated March 13, 1986.
6. Letter from Westminster School District and response from City Administrator.
CWT/TA:sr
2382h
Page 3 - Council Minutes - 3/17/86
Findings for Denial:
1. Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique topographic
features of the subject property, there does not appear to be exceptional
or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land,
buildings or premises involved which do not apply generally to property
of class of uses in the same district. The parcel is similar in size and
shape with other parcels in the subdivision and is relatively flat.
2. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property
of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone classification
because it is a typical 60 by 100 foot R1 zoned lot.
3. Since the subject property can be fully developed within regular esta-
blished setbacks, such a conditional exception is not necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
4. Granting of Conditional Eception No. 85-93 would constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the
vicinity.
5. Conditional Exception No. 81-49 was approved by the Planning Commission
in 1982 and is still effective which and permits an addition to encroach
2 feet into the required 10 foot setback.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green
NOES: Thomas, Kelly
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC HEARING - PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO 85-2 - CONTINUED TO
5 17 86 - GOTHARD STREET - ORDINANCE NO 2827 - RESOLUTION NO 5647
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider realignment of Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue. The proposed
alignment would move the current centerline of Gothard Street easterly approx-
imately 250 feet and align that portion of Gothard Street, south of McFadden
Avenue to Center Drive.
The Deputy City Clerk announced chat all legal requirements for notification,
publication and posting had been met, and that she had received no communica-
tions or written protests to the matter.
Councilwoman Bailey stated that because of a possible conflict of interest she
would abstain from discussion or voting on the issue.
The Director. of Development Services stated that a letter had been distributed
to Council dated March 13, 1986 from Kent V. Gale, Projects Engineer, Southern
Pacific Transportation Company, objecting to the placement of Gothard Street
within the existing railroad underpass structure under the San Diego Freeway.
The Director of Public Works presented a staff report.
T
. Page 4 - Council Minutes - 3/17/86
The Mayor declared the hearing open.
Stephen Chase, attorney representing Southern Pacific Transportation Company,
stated that they had no plans to abandon the rail line involved in the pro-
ject. He stated that the railroad has a pending lease that has been consider-
ably delayed and suggested that if the Council approved the realignment of
Gothard Street the City should be prepared to purchase the property immedi-
ately.
Orrin Burge addressed Council and explained he wanted to build a mini-ware-
house in the area and was opposed to the realignment of Gothard Street. He
questioned information the City had received and the cost effectiveness of the,
project.
Ron Pattinson, representing the Pacific Coast Corporation which has the lease-
hold interest on the property in question with the railroad, stated that a
1984 study of Huntington Center and the realignment of Gothard Street indi-
cated that such realignment was feasible only if the railroad line was
removed. He stated he did not believe the realignment would be cost effective.
Bob Getzfrid, a resident of Westminster, said he lived on the first street
north o Gothard Street, and was concerned about traffic coming from Vermont
Street, and the loss of the traffic light at Vermont Street if Gothard - is
realigned. He was also concerned about future truck traffic on Gothard
Street He suggested that his tract be annexed into the City of Huntington
Beach.
There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no
further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the
Mayor.
The Deputy City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5647 for introduction - "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. .85-2, THE ALIGN-
MENT OF GOTHARD STREET, SOUTH OF MC FADDEN AVENUE."
The Deputy City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2817 for introduction - "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI-
NANCE CODE BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 15 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT N0. 85-2 TO REALIGN GOTHARD STREET. SOUTH OF MC FADDEN AVENUE."
Council and sta discussed CAT :`�S' attitude regarding creating a freeway
off ramp in the area, the success of the alignment without the railroad pro-
perty, the_ triggering mechanism to obligate the City to acquire property by
eminent domain and the possibility of leasing such land to a developer for a
period of ten years.
A motion was made by MacAllister , seconded by Kelly, to continue considera-
tion of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 85-2 for sixty days and to direct
staff to gather additional information regarding, costs, financing, participa-_
ting agencies and funding for the project in ten to fifteen years. The motion
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Green, Thomas
NOES: None
NOT VOTING: Bailey
ABSENT: None
_ANNING
SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5 . 1
CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
USE OF PROPERTY- MAP .
BOISA AVE
t .r
o
t
a♦� I � � � � I I I
I '� j I ICf I � $TYIN T
1 INUNTINGTON:
I ""TNEY OR.
4a�
CITY
I � f
9f I
f
"I
r
CF-E
J � _
-
I W
I m
f
7 C� LF.ilT2 I Y:tiTinYF.i�'. ::`.1:`N: _E4': SF...'W..:i
F _ I o
c (m+ r
i � 1
ffv .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Telephone ( 213) 620-3874
March 10, 1986
7-ORA-405 17 .2
Gothard Street
extension
07210 General
Honorable Nolan Frizzelle
Assemblyman, 69th District
17195 Newhope Street , Suite 201 MAR
Fountain Valley, CA 92708 CJT( OF
Dear Assemblyman Frizzelle: OFFiC�
This is in .reply to your letter of February 28, 1986 concerning
the City of Huntington Beach's proposal to extend Gothard Street
under or over the San Diego Freeway.
Caltrans has no objections to the City' s proposal of extending
Gothard Street either by utilizing the railroad opening under
the freeway or. by constructing a new overcrossing providing
all Caltrans standards are meta
Caltrans would not be providing any funds for the project but
would work closely with the City to facilitate the project .
The City has indicated a willingness to obtain all right-of-way
and financing for the project in its entirety.
The City of Huntington Beach has also been studying the
feasibility of a Route 405 interchange at Gothard Street as
a future addition to the project . Initial concepts submitted
by the City have not been acceptable since they do not meet
Caltrans design standards . However, Caltrans will continue
to work with the City on this aspect as well as on all phases
of its project as additional data becomes available .
I hope this answers your concerns regarding the extension of
Gothard Street. For additional information or questions con-
cerning this proposal, please call me or your -staff may call
Mr. Sid Elicks , Branch Chief in charge of Orange County projects
at ( 213 ) 620-3210 .
Sincerely,
POIN4Z L. WATS0N
District Director /
CC: Charles Thompson - Huntington Beach City Administrator �/
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Tom Andrusky t/
To Distribution From Redevelopment
Project Manager
Subject CITY OF WESTMINSTER RESPONSE Date April 3, 1986
TO REQUEST INFORMATION ON
GOTHARD-HOOVER EXTENSION
Attached for your information is a letter from Jerry Kenny, Deputy City Administrator of
Westminster regarding the Gothard-Hoover extension.
TA:sr
Attachment
Distribution: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment
Paul Cook, Director of Public Works
James W. Palin, Director of Development Services
Dan Brennan, Real Property Manager
Les Evans, City Engineer
Bruce Gilmer, Traffic Engineer
2271h
1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF REDEVELOPMENT
April 3, 1986
Mr. Jerry Kenny
Deputy City Administrator
City of Westminster Civic Center
8200 Westminster Boulevard
Westminster, California 92683
Dear Jerry,
Thank you for the letter you sent dated April 1, 1986. The information will be helpful in
preparing a report for our City Council.
Sincerely,
Thomas Andrusky .
Redevelopment Project Manager
TA:sr
Telephone (714)536-5582
F
117-tLi of Westminster
CIVIC CENTER
8200 WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD
WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683
1 April 1986 714 CODE 898-3311
Mr. Thomas Andrusky, Redevelopment Project Manager
City of Huntington Beach
PO Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Tom:
It was a pleasure to meet with you, Paul Cook and Jim Palin last Wednesday to dis-
cuss the City of Huntington Beach's proposed realignment of Gothard Street. I also
appreciate the copies of the realignment studies and elevations (Frischer Reports)
and will review them as time permits.
You requested I write concerning any information I might have on the area between
Bolsa and McFadden Avenues adjacent to the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way
just south of where Hoover Street dead-ends at Bolsa Avenue.
As I informed you at the meeting, I have very little information concerning this area.
Besides meeting with you, I have met with Orin Berge, Ronald Pattinson and two rep-
resentatives from Southern Pacific, Kent Gale and R. A. Schuffenhauer. They were
interested in determining if the City of Westminster was intending to extend Hoover
Street to McFadden Avenue. I could only tell them what I told you, that the West-
minster City Council directed staff to bring the issue to the Traffic Commission,
which I did (see attached excerpt from minutes), that we were under-staffed with a
limited budget which curtails our capabilities for traffic studies, that it was not
an area of high priority in this department wherein it could only be studied as time
permits., and that our City Council had heard from concerned residents in the housing
tract objecting to any extension of Hoover Street. In addition, we discussed the
General Plan and the Streets and Highway Map. Below are the comments of Don Vestal
which discuss the General Plan and the most recent zone change on the property.
The Circulation Element of the General Plan has shown Hoover Street extending south
from Bolsa Avenue to McFadden Avenue since the General Plan was originally adopted
in 1965. Hoover Street is designated as a "secondary highway" by the General Plan..
The Official Street and Highway Map has never shown Hoover Street extending south of
Bolsa Avenue. Pursuant to Section 17.48.05ON of the Westminster Municipal Code, the,
Official Street and Highway Map is the legal basis for requiring street dedications
and improvements as a condition of a development approval .
On November 13, 1984, the City Council approved Zone Change R-426 which rezoned
1 .17 acres of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's property extending north
from McFadden Avenue to the southerly boundary of the San Diego Freeway right-of-way
from PF "Public Facility" to CM-PD "Commercial-Industrial--Planned Development. "
The property is a 100-foot-wide strip located between the Southern California Edison
right-of-way on the west and the railroad line on the east.
To date no application has been submitted for development of this property; however,
given the existing status of the property, we will process such an application if it
is submitted.
Mr. Thomas Andrusky, Redevelopment Project Mgr. 1 April 1986
City of Huntington Beach Page 2
I have also enclosed a page from the County Assessor's book showing the area we
viewed as a possible roadway to the Land School site if the school site was leased
to a tenant who might generate a traffic problem in the neighborhood. To this date,
nothing further has been done. As you can see, the City does not own the property.
Tom, I hope I have been able to address the issues we discussed and that this letter
will be of some assistance to you. If you need anything else, please call me.
Sincerely,
Cl..T-X OF WESTMINSTER
/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
i
i
r
Jerry Ke
Deputy C ty Administrator/" I
r
mb
encls
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF WESTMINSTER TRAFFIC. COMMISSION MEETING
HELD ON MARCH 4, 1986
NEW BUSINESS Mr. Kenny advised the Commission that staff scheduled on this
agenda a discussion on the study of alternate methods to relieve
traffic on Beach Boulevard in accordance with the instructions of
the City Council. The Council had received a request from the
City of Huntington Beach to further consider the extension of Hoover
Street through to McFadden Avenue to connect with Gothard Street
in that city which they are proposing to realign. This could then
be an alternate to using Beach .Boulevard. Mr. Kenny further stated
staff would like some direction from the Commission on how this
matter should be approached.
In the ensuing discussion on the extension of Hoover Street, it was
brought out that the railroad would probably have to abandon some
of their property. It was also noted it would be close to some of
the residences and many of these property owners have objected to
this extension. Some of the Commissioners felt this would not be
a viable alternate route because Hoover Street ends at Garden
Grove Boulevard.
Chairman Treantos stated he travels on Hoover Street quite fre-
quently and it does not carry a lot of traffic. Since it presently
runs from Bolsa Avenue to Garden Grove Boulevard, he doesn't
think it's feasible -for people to use it when there are so many
straight through streets like Goldenwest Street or Newland Street.
3/4/86 - 2.
0 �
h rEY 11P r' ).et.lEu"Ar aoC.4 r�r IK wr•wapw
N.W.Cp '4.W 11'pil
BOLSA N�•� ••,�o�E AVENUE
BOLS A
ALL WINICCAR IM44 1169M TI DOM IVEYUE E1<CErf IT'
M MEET IMTEl4ECTIOM•IIE PEeICITEPTOT19 MY061E6TM106TEe
/illM• I1�.4lII,1ltiM I)�y
MIl�•'l9•!0'E
j
N
o '
;�°`gip �q•�4 .
LEHIGH*
ZZ
3k. rSJvl ;
,'�� = ' • rIMItl�lE
40
1•bbo'uu
th
6L r Vi �
i�i j�ll � � rw r'�
NIP
10
pi V
�11 _��� 2 � AN•11'T�•c IN.!!' _ _ '' M99'll'e'!�•''
M I elr.'u-i " it•f0'
n t.16. n wrMs* MWti'Doi
1 0
1
= A
7
i
b
s�
4C -�
ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPDRTAT/ON COMMISSION
April 18, 1986 R E C E IV E
OF_ T.OF PUSL.IC WORKS
Paul Cook APR 211986
Director of Public Works
2000 Main Street HUVMC rrro1q BEAD' CALIF'
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Gothard/Hoover Street Interchange
Dear Paul :
On March 24, 1986, the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) approved
the Beach Boulevard Super Streets Demonstration Project Final Report and
Program Environmental Impact Report. The report contains specific improvements
for Beach Boulevard and a list of additional roadway improvements. One of the
additional improvements the Commission recommended for further consideration
is the Gothard/Hoover Street interchange at the San Diego Freeway ( I-405) .
This improvement is considered important because it helps alleviate the conges-
tion at the Beach Boulevard/Edinger Avenue intersection. While the Beach Boule-
vard Super Streets improvements will improve the traffic flow at this inter-
section, the surrounding area will continue to experience traffic congestion.
The existing congestion and projected growth for the Huntington Center area
Will necessitate the need for the interchange.
Since the City of Huntington Beach is currently evaluating the feasibility of
the Gothard/Hoover Street interchange, I suggest the City also address the
following items:
1. The need for an amendment to the County' s Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH) and the Circulation Elements of the cities of Huntington
Beach and Westminster - Currently, the County's MPAH does not show a
connection between Gothard Street and Hoover Street or an interchange
with the San Diego Freeway. Jerry Bennett or Bob Peterson from the
County should be contacted regarding an amendment.
2. A financial plan for designing and constructing-the-:.improvements--
A plan addressing the funding sources for the project should be prepared.
It is assumed that local funding Jnywic/private) would be the primary
source. ,
Commissioners:
James Beam* Clarice A.Blamer* Ralph B.Clark•Richard B.Edgar• ThomasF.Riley•James Roosevelt*HarriettM.Wieder•DonaldL.Watson
1055 North Main, Suite 516, Santa Aria, California 92701 (714)834-7581
Paul Cook Page Two
Director of Public Works
3. The role of Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
on the project - Caltrans and FHWA are responsible for approving any
connections to the interstate system. Their involvement early in the
process is important.
4. An agreement with the City of Westminster - The Gothard/Hoover
Street interchange affects both the City of Westminster and Hunting-
ton Beach. Concurrence on the proposed project is essential to its
success.
We believe the Gothard/Hoover Street interchange is a. necessary improvement
to the circulation system in Huntington Beach. However, many issues must
be addressed regarding its feasibility.
Please call me if you need additional information or if you wish to discuss
the items listed above.
Sincerely,
C` d
i a Mills, Manager
H' hway and Transit Programs
LM:bc
r
US
14121 Cedarwood Avenue i Westminster, California 92683-4482 =(7 1-4) 89-4 ;
114-
0-syrici Sune.,nten ent Donald P Stuckev E�U ��
- o 7--jQ -�RT:S TONES E PAN :o.jE` -.G A-SE4 uawG:c . o CE
klay 1 , 1986
The Honorable Robert P. Mandic, Jr. , Mayor M'Qj' D
C,,ty of Huntington Beach C 7
2000 Main Street ��y,O,,F
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _V r eJN 'TO
Dear Mr. Mandic: C/C OFFC1`�c
This is to register the Westminster School District Board of Trustees'
opposition to the proposed realignment of Gothard Street which is
master planned to connect with'Hoover Street at the Westminster city
boundary.
We realize that Gothard Street and Hoover Street are in different
governmental jurisdictions. Nevertheless, ethics dictate that the
Board's thinking on this proposed project be shared with the Council
before you take action on it. Your decision could lead to a profound
adverse impact upon the Westminster School District.
The intent to create a major north-south traffic artery is unacceptable
to the District. A resultant increase in the volume of street traffic and
its'accompanying noise would be intolerable for the educational program
the District plans to operate at Land School this fall and in the future.
An identical problem would be caused for Webber School on Hoover
Street, a little north of Bolsa Avenue. In addition, such a plan would
interfere with our school buses which must use Hoover Street to get
to and from the bus yard. Of course, the Board must take a position
against such crippling invasion to the educational program and services
to our children.
It appears that the proposed realignment and extension of Gothard Street-
and subsequent connection to Hoover Street would require a substantial
portion of the Land School campus. The Board is firm in its position
not to release any of the Land School property and will resist any attempt
at acquisition by eminent domain.
Robert P. Mandic, Jr. , Mayor
City of Huntington Beach
May 1 , 1986
page two
We hope that further consideration of the project will not disregard
our concerns which are major and legitimate. Rather, we expect
the good neighbor policy to prevail . In this vein, the Board offers
its ccoperation in seeking a viable alternative to meeting your city's
need.
c
The Board solicits your "no" vote on the Gothard Street realignment
project.
Sincerely,
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
E. Rand Fruechting, Presi en
Margie L. %4ce, Vice President
LiG6.
Cin Arthur, Clerk
AlbertJ. ng l era
Curtis D. Jones
-1
•
e ' - City Huntington of Hunti ton Beach
. 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
- -* OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
%lav 15, 1986
E. Rand FruecL-'ting, President
Westminster School District
Board of Trustees
i 4121 Cedarwood Avenue
`X estminster, California 92683
Dear President Fruechting:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to your letter of slay 1, 1986 to Mayor Mandic
regarding the Gothard Street realignment and, hopefully, to clear up some
misunderstandings about this proposal. A member of our staff met with District
Superintendent Don Stuckey and other District staff on May 14, 1986 to provide
information on how the proposed Gothard realignment could be accomplished without any
adverse impact on Land School.
On May 19, 1986 the Huntington Beach City Council will be discussing a proposed precise
alignment of Gothard beween 11cFadden and Center Avenue in the City of Huntington
Beach.
That portion of the proposed Gothard-Hoover extension between McFadden and Bolsa does
not have a precise alignment proposed. Our evaluation does not indicate any need for
Land School property. The land for the future roadway is planned to come from the
railroad and from Southern California Edison. The Gothard-Hoover extension north of
McFacden is in the City of Westminster and is under evaluation by the City of
Westminster Traffic Commission.
Our traffic evaluations and those of the Orange County Transportation Commission
conclude that the escalation of traffic volumes on Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street
would in future years require the need for another north/south street such as the
Gothard-Hoover extension. Although actual construction of a new roadway would most
likely be years in the future, prior planning is important to ensure that all alternatives are
considered and that all interested agencies, groups, and individuals have the opportunity
for input. Unless such long range planning is done now the public interest suffers for
many years in the future.
Thank you for your thoughtful interest in our project. We look forward to continuing to
work with you as good neighbors..
Sinc
Charles W. Thompson
City Administrator
REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
d _ •
s Date March 17, 1986
Submitted to: '; Hodorlble !Mayor and City Council
r
Submitted by: Charl�s W,% Thompson , City Administrat r
Prepared by: Jame(A-.W. Perlin, Director, Development Services6fvk! "J'`i
Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION 85-72/PRECISE PLAN OF STREET
ALIGNMENT 85-2 g"LJma�yy,, ____
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception7
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration is Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 85-2 . This is a request by the City of Huntington
Beach to realign Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue. The
proposed alignment would move the current centerline of Gothard
Street easterly approximately 250 feet and align that portion of
Gothard, south of McFadden Avenue to Center Drive . The purpose of
the realignment is to align Gothard Street with the proposed
extension of Gothard to the north through to Hoover Street in the
City of Westminister .
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny
Precise Plan of Street Alignment 85-2 based on the following
findings :
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO RECOMMEND
DENIAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 85-2 BASED ON FINDINGS BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Erskine, Mirjahangir , Porter , Livengood
NOES: Winchell, - Schumacher, Rowe
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL:
1 . The City of Westminister has not entered into a written
agreement on the alignment of Gothard Street with the City of
Huntington Beach to insure the future connection of Hoover
Street with Gothard Street .
2. Based on public testimony presented to the Planning Commission,
approval of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 85-2 will be
detrimental to the general health , welfare and safety of the
City of Huntington Beach.
PIO 4/84
3 . Due to the uncertainty of improvements needed to complete a
realignment of Gothard Street, .coupled with the unknown costs ,
approval of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 85-2 would not be
in the best interests of the community.
Commissioner 's Winchell , Schumacher and Rowe, requested the
following minority opinion be transmitted to the City Council .
MINORITY REPORT:
Commissioner ' s Winchell , Schumacher and Rowe believe the City
Council should approve this alignment and take the following
information into consideration before making a decision on the
precise plan of street alignment:
1 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 85-2 connecting Gothard to
Hoover Street will be the first step toward alleviating future
traffic problems on Beach Boulevard by providing an alternative
route to southern Huntington Beach. .
2 . Precise Plan of Street Alignment 85-2 should be implemented to
address the circulation problems identified by the Huntington
Center Redevelopment Plan .
3. From an economic viewpoint , it is more cost effective to
precise plan Gothard Street at this time, and purchase the
property while it is still vacant . The price for property will
increase if structures are constructed on right-of-way parcels .
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 85-2 by adopting the attached Resolution and
Ordinance after certifying Negative Declaration No . 85-72 .
ANALYSIS:
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
LOCATION: Gothard Street between McFadden Avenue and Center Drive
REQUEST: Realignment of Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue
moving the centerline eastward approximately 250 feet for
the portion of Gothard which extends 500 feet south of
McFadden Avenue .
DISCUSSION:
Gothard Street, between Center Drive and McFadden Avenue, is within
the boundaries of the Huntington Center Commercial District
Redevelopment Plan . One of the proposed improvements for the
infrastructure includes "Realignment of Gothard Street and extension
to Bolsa Avenue to connect with Hoover Street and the construction
of an on and off-ramp on the I-405 freeway at Gothard.
RCA - 3/17/86 -2- (4339d )
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 is intended as an initial ,
step toward resolving the circulation problems identified by the
Redevelopment Plan . . The realignment- of Gothard Street, coupled with
the connection of Gothard Street to Hoover Street will provide for
another transportation corridor to South Huntington Beach . This
would serve to reduce the number of vehicles on Beach Boulevard .
The Orange County Transportation Commission Beach Boulevard Super
Street Project would greatly benefit from such a connection. The
Orange County Transportation Commission has indicated support of the
Gothard/Hoover connection because of the transportation benefits to
the region.
Gothard is a four lane secondary arterial with an 80 foot
right-of-way having traffic counts estimated at 16 ,000 vehicle trips
per day. The realignment of Gothard Street would require the
purchasing of approximately 48 ,000 square feet (80 ' x 6001 ) with a
resulting vacation at some future. date of the same area (former
Gothard Street ) .
During the review by the Planning Commission of the Precise Plan of
Street Alignment, they expressed concern regarding the fact that
there is currently an application which has been filed with the
Board of Zoning Adjustments . The application is to develop a
mini-warehouse facility in the area where the Gothard Street
realignment is being considered . The applicant is leasing the
property from the Southern Pacific Railroad . Staff has indicated to
the lessee of the property that temporary portable structures or
open storage for RV' s and boats to the North end of their proposed
development would be an acceptable interim use of the property. The
permanent mini-warehouse facility could then be constructed at the
South end of the property. Such a compromise would afford the
lessee the use and enjoyment of his property without significantly
increasing the cost to the City in the event the property is
acquired for the realignment of Gothard Street .
The Planning Commission directed Staff to contact the City of
Westminister , Westminister School District, and Southern California
Edison to determine their position on the City 's proposal for
realignment . Attached for the Council review are the letters that
were received from these agencies . It should also be noted that the
City of Westminister has agreed in concept- to participate in future
studies which would align Gothard Street to Hoover Street .
Westminister 's Circulation Element does show Hoover Street
connecting with Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue . Their
circulation map also depicts Gothard Street in the City of
Huntington Beach as Hoover Street.
Staff also surveyed the users of the. Southern Pacific Freight Line
along Gothard Street to ascertain their dependency on rail service .
We have attached the results of that survey for the City Council 's
review.
RCA - 3/17/86 -3- (4339d )
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations i.n effect at- this time,
the Department of Development Services posted Negative Declaration
No . 85-72 for ten days and no comments either verbal of written were
received . The staff in its initial study of the project has
recommended- that a negative declaration be issued for the Precise
Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2. Prior to any action on the
Precise Plan of Street Alignment , it is necessary for the City
Council to certify Negative Declaration No. 85-72 .
FUNDING SOURCE:
The staff has identified a number of funding sources available to
the City of Huntington Beach .to finance the realignment of Gothard
Street.
1 . Arterial Highway Fund Financing Program; through the County of
Orange
2 . City Gas Tax Funds
3 . Orange County Unified Trust Funds ; available for the next three
years
4 . Federal Aid Urban Funds
5 . Tax increment generated from the Huntington Center Commercial
District Redevelopment Project Area
ALTERNATIVE:
The City Council may consider denying Precise Plan of Street
Alignment 85-2 and maintain Gothard Street with its current
alignment and circulation pattern .
ATTACHMENTS•
1 . Resolution with revised legal description
2 . Ordinance with revised legal description
3. Staff Report dated February 19 , 1986, with attachments :
a . Ordinance
b . Letters from interested agencies
C . Survey of rail uses along Gothard
4 . Minutes of February 19 , 1986 Planning Commission meeting
JWP: HZ:kla
RCA - 3/17/86 -4- (4339d )
southern Pacific
Transportation Company
IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO
610 SOUTH MAIN STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA*014
PHONE: (213) 629-6408
ROOM -6SO
K.V. GALE March 13, 1986
PUBLIC PROJECTS ENGINEER r-{ •+'
City Council Members
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 `
Attn: Ms . Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk
Dear City Council Members :
Please refer to Notice cf Public Hearing of March 6, 1986,
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2, concerning realigning
the centerline of Gothard Street eastward approximately 250 feet
for the portion of Gothard which extends 600 feet south of McFadden
Avenue. The purpose of the realignment is to align Gothard Street
with the proposed extension of Gothard to the north through to
Hoover Street.
In the past I have attended several meetings with the City' s
staff to discuss proposed alignment , but have not received any
correspondence or environmental data for my review and comments.
This Company would object to the placement of Gothard Street
within the existing railroad underpass structure under the San
Diego Freeway. At an on-site meeting on May 30, 1985, represent-
atives from CALTRANS and the California Public Utilities Commission
also expressed their concerns and requested your environmental firm
investigate the possibility of constructing a new structure over
or under the San Diego Freeway.
Our Stanton Branch Main Line serving your City is economic-
ally viable and used daily, except Saturday, by our trains to
service businesses within your City.
Very truly ours,
ent Gale
Public Pr ects Engineer
cc : Mr. Douglas N. LaBelle ,
Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment
City of Huntington Beach
Mr. Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
Mr. James L. Hazeltine, V. P.
Pacific Coast Corp. , 18600 Main St. /
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
sTaff . huntington beach development services department
REPORT
TO: Plannina Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: February 19 , 1986
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 - GOTHARD
REALIGNMENT ( CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 17 , 1986 AND
FEBRUARY 4, 1986)
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: . Realignment of Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue
moving the centerline eastward approximately 250 feet
for the portion of Gothard which extends 600 feet south
of McFadden Avenue .
On February 4 , 1986 , the Planning Commission continued Precise Plan
of Street Alignment 85-2 until February 19, 1986 in order for staff
to solicit written responses from the Edison Company, Westminister
School District , and Pacific Railroad as to their position on the
City's proposal for realignment .
The Huntington Center Redevelopment Project Area Manager has sent
out letters (see attached) to the agencies identified by the
Planning Commission . To date, we have not received a response, but
will distribute any communication delivered subsequent to this
report being printed .
Additionally, the Department of Public Works has revised the legal
description for the Precise Plan of Street Alignment so that Gothard
Street does not cross the railroad right-of-way but is aligned
adjacently to the west (see attached illustration ) . The staff ' s
position is to maintain 40 feet clearance adjacent to the railroad
right of way in order to accommodate future light rail .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No. 85-72 and Precise Plan of Street Alignment 86-2 and
recommend its adoption to the City Council .
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Letters transmitted from Redevelopment Project Manager
2. Resolutions with revised legal description
3. Staff report with ordinance
JWP:HZ :kla
( 4238d )
A-F M-23A
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , 40
ti
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF REDEVELOPMENT
February 10, 1986 p ��
W
H. W. "Bill" Compton
Area Manager
Southern California Edison
7333 Bolsa Avenue
Westminster, California 92683-5294
Dear Bill:
The Planning Commission has deferred action on the Precise Plan Street Alignment No.
85-2 - Gothard Realignment until February 18, 1986.
The Commission would like a letter indicating that you have reviewed the matter. They
also would like to know if you have any objections to the proposal.
In order to include your response in the staff report your letter would need to be in City
Hall on or before Friday, February 14, 1986. If you have any questions please call me at
the number listed below. -
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Thomas Andrusky,
Redevelopment Project Manager
cc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator
Paul Cook, Director of Public Works
!,lames W. Palin, Director of Development Services
HUNTINGTON BEACH
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
FEB 10 1986
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Telephone (714)536-5682
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF REDEVELOPMENT
February 10, 1986
Dr. Don Stuckey"
District Superintendent
Westminister Elementary School District
14121 Cedarwood Avenue . ---
Westminster, California 92683
Dear Dr. Stuckey:
The Planning Commission has deferred action on the Precise Plan Street Alignment No.
85-2 - Gothard Realignment.
The Commission would like a letter from the School District indicating that you have
reviewed the matter. They also would like to know if you have any objections to the
proposal.
In order to include your response in the staff report your letter would need to be in City
Hall on or before Friday, February 14, 1986. If you have any questions please call me at
the number listed below.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
n �o
Thomas Andrusky, .. - _. ._ ..". . .. . _..
Redevelopment Project Manager
cc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator
Paul Cook, Director of Public Works
•„Iames W. Palin, Director of Development Services
Telephone (714)536-5582
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ZIJ 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF REDEVELOPMENT
February 10, 1986
Mr. Chris C. Christiansen
City Administrator
8200 Westminster Avenue
Westminster, California 92683
Dear Mr. Christiansen:
The Planning Commission has deferred action on the Precise Plan Street Alignment No.
85-2 - Gothard Realignment.
The Commission would like a letter from the City of Westiminster indicating that you
have reviewed the matter, any objections you may have and confirmation that the
Gothard-Hoover extension between Bolsa and McFadden is on your General
Plan-Transportation Plan.
In order to include your response in the staff report your letter would need to be in City
Hall on or before Friday, February 14, 1986. If you have any questions please call me at
the number listed below.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Thomas Andrusky,
Redevelopment Project Manager
cc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator
Paul Cook, Director of Public Works
(.Ames W. Palin, Director of Development Services
Telephone (714)536-5582
L vvl Ptostrict
14121 Cedarwood Avenue / Westminster, California 92683
" — (714) 894-7311
District Superintendent: Donald P. Stuckey, Ed.D.
Board of Trustees: Cindi Arthur E. Rand Fruechting Albert J. Ingallinera Margie L. Rice
February 14, 1986
Mr. Thomas Andrusky
Redevelopment Project Manager -
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Andrusky,
This is in response to your letter dated February 10, 1986, regarding the
City's plan to realign Gothard Street.
If the City is able to realign Gothard Street and at some future date connect
it with Hoover Street without involving the Land Elementary School in any way,
then we are .-favorable to the idea. However, we are vehemently opposed to
connecting the two streets if it means that some of the Land Elementary School
property must be utilized to make the plan operable.
Sincerely,
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
E. Rand Fruechting, President
Margie Rice, Vice President
ynthia A. Art`iur, Clerk
Albert J. &ngalnera, Member
DPS/dp
t
01.14-tvof 39jeshninster
CIVIC CENTER
8200 WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD
WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683
714 CODE 898.3311
February 12, 1986
Mr. Thomas Andrusky
Redevelopment Project Manager
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Tom:
In response to your letter of February 10 , 1986, please
be advised that the City Council referred the traffic
problem to the City' s Traffic Commission for study.
As you are probably aware, members of the Huntington
Beach and Westminster City Councils, together with
Charlie Thompson and I, met privately to discuss
mutual traffic problems. As Charlie knows, the out-
growth of that meeting was mutually beneficial and to
everyone' s advantage.
Your letter is correct that the Gothard-Hoover extension
between Bolsa and McFadden is on our Circulation Element
of our General Plan.
I hope the above answers any questions you may have.
Sincerely -
Ch ' s C. Christiansen
C ty Administrator
sd
cc: City Council
.o.
Southem Ca1/fomia Ed/son Company
7333 BOLSA AVENUE
WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683
I
February 13 , 1986
.M. W. COMPTON TELEPHONE
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER (TIA1 895-0271
Charles W. Thompson
City Administrator
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA
SUBJECT: Precise Plan Street
Alignment No. 85-2
Gothard Realignment
Dear Charles:
In regard to the Gothard Street realignment, we do have some
specific concerns, as it impacts our 220kv Transmission Line
right-of-way.
The proposed crossing of our right-of-way -requires a
considerable amount of our property to be used for street
purposes. This surface u.se will preclude any future use of
this property for our operating needs , i.e. towers, poles, '
or other types of electrical facilities we might need.
This right-of-way is a vital part of our transmission system
and cannot be jeopardized in any way.
We would like to meet and discuss the merits of the Gothard
Realignment, so we may be able respond in a more effective
manner to the proposal.
At this time, we are not prepared to make any decision
regarding the project.
Sincerely,
HWC\kam
cc. .Douglas N. LaBelle
Paul Cook
James Palin
Thomas Andrusky
RESOLUTION NO. 1352
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO.
85-2, THE ALIGNMENT OF GOTHARD STREET, SOUTH OF
MC F.ADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington
Beach, California, has held one public hearing in compliance with
the State Government Code in order to consider and review Precise
Plan of Street Alignment no. 85-2.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that said.
precise plan will protect the public health and safety of the
inhabitants of the City and allow for an orderly development of the
community.
WHEREAS, the Huntington Center Commercial' District
Redevelopment Project Area Plan has as one of its primary goals to
improve vehicular circulation through the realignment of Gothard in
order to connect with Hoover Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of
the City of Huntington Beach hereby approves said Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 85-2.
REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 19th. day of February.
1986, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
James W. Pa in, Secretary Tom Livengood, Chairman
(4253d )
Gothard Street Centerline Description from Center Street
to McFadden Avenue
Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel 1 as shown on a map
recorded in book 169 , pages 45 and 46, parcel maps , said corner
being the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 500. 00 feet; thence northerly and easterly along said
curve through a central angle of 45°00 ' 00" . An arc distance of
392. 70 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 44020 ' 07"
east 276. 66 feet along said tangent line to a point on a tangent
curve, said curve being concave to the northwest and having a
radius of 900. 00 feet; thence easterly and northerly along said
curve through a central angle of 44'59 ' 42" , an arc distance of
706. 78 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 0°39 ' 35"
west 133. 15 feet along said tangent line to the point of
termination.
nuntington beach development services department
STQ f f
REPORT
=.t0: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE : February 4 , 1986
- SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 - GOTHARD •
REALIGNMENT (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 17, 1986)
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: Realignment of Gothard Street south of McFadden Avenue
moving .the centerline eastward approximately 250 feet
for the portion of Gothard which extends 600 feet south
of McFadden Avenue .
1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Approve Negative Declaration No . 85-72 and Precise' Plan of Street
Alignment 86-2 and recommend. its adoption to the City Council . ,
2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
On December 17 , 1985, the Planning Commission continued Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No. 85-2 to the February 4 , 1986 Planning
Commission meeting. This is a request by the City of Huntington
Beach to realign Gothard Street eastward approximately 250 feet and
align that .portion of Gothard, 600 feet south of McFadden Avenue .
The purpose of the realignment is to align Gothard Street with the
proposed extension of Gothard to the north through to Hoover Street.
The Planning Commission directed- staff (at the December 17, 1985
meeting) to determine the City of Westminister ' s plans for Hoover
Street . In addition, the Commission requested information relative
to the level of dependency which the businesses along Gothard Street
. have on rail service.
With respect to the former issue , the City Administrator and members
of the City Council have met with Westminister City. Council members
and their City Manager to discuss a cooperative effort in aligning
Gothard Street to Hoover Street . As a result, the City of
Westminister has agreed in concept to participate in future studies
which would align Gothard to Hoover Street . Further, Westminister 's
Circulation Element does show Hoover Street connecting with Gothard
Street south of McFadden Avenue . Their circulation map also depicts
Gothard Street in the City of Huntington Beach as Hoover Street .
maw sm
A-FM-23A
It should also be noted that the Huntington Center Redevelopment
Area Project Manager (under contract to the City) has had..
discussions with representatives from the Edison Company and
Westminister School District about the realignment of Gothard
Street. At this time, neither agency has taken an official position
on. the project.
To address the latter .subject ( rail usage by businesses along
Gothard Street) the Huntington Center Redevelopment Area Project
Manager surveyed the users . of the Southern Pacific Freight Line to
ascertain their dependency on its continued use. Attached for the
Planning Commission' s review are the results of that survey.
As indicated in a previous staff report, the precise plan of street
alignment is intended as a significant step toward resolving the
circulation problems identified by the Huntington Center Commercial
Redevelopment Plan adopted by the City Council . Redevelopment
Agency staff has indicated that funds will be made available to
acquire the right of way from Southern Pacific to meet the City' s
goals for the area.
3.0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No. 85-72 and Precise Plan of Street Alignment 86-2 and
recommend its adoption to th City Council .
ATTACHMENT•
1 . Survey of Users of Southern Pacific Freight Lines
2 . Circulation Map - City of Westminister
3 . Staff Report dated December 17, 1985
JWP: Yl
a
Staff Report - 2/4/86 -2- (4149d )
i
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY
AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 15 TO INCLUDE PRECISE
PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 TO REALIGN
GOTHARD STREET SOUTH OF MC FADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law, partic-
ularly California Government Code sections 6545.3 et seq. , the
Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after no-
tice duly given, held a public hearing on December 17, 1985
consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 to move
that portion of the existing centerline of Gothard Street, ex-
tending six hundred (600) . feet south of McFadden AVenue, ap-
proximately 250 feet; and
3 On 1986 , after notice duly given,
hearing was held before this Council , . and the matter having
been considered, the Council finds that said Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 85-2 is �reasonably necessary to the
orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of
the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city, and for
the orderly development of the community,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1 . That the real property hereinafter described
and shown on the map marked Exhibit A,• attached hereto, incor-
porated herein and by this reference, is hereby designated and
adopted as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No .- 85-2 of the
City of Huntington Beach:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel 1
as shown on a map recorded in Book 169, pages
45 and 46, Parcel Maps , said corner being the
beginning of a curve concave southeasterly and
- t
1 .
having a radius of 500 .00 feet; thence nor-
therly and easterly along said curve through a
c central angle of 45°00 '00" . An arc distance
of 392.70 -feet to a point on a tangent line;
thence- north 44"20 '07" east 318. 97 feet along
said tangent line to a point on a tangent
curve, said curve being. concave to the north_-
west and having a radius of 900.00 feet
thence easterly and northerly along said curve
through a central angle of 45°00 '00" , an arc
distance of 706 .86 feet to a point on a tan-
gent line;- thence north 0.°39 '35" west 103 .00
feet along said tangent line to
- the point of termination.
SECTION 2 . District . Map No. 15 (.Sectional District Map
14-5-11 ) is hereby amended to show the realignment of that por-
tion of the -existing centerline of Gothard Street, extending
six (600) feet south of McFadden Avenue, by moving such center-
line approximately 250 feet.
SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
j Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
s
day of 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney '
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator Director of Development
Services
ahb; 12/17/85
1097L/3982
2.
CANNING _ ZONING - DM 15
SECTIONAL DISTRICT , * MAP 14-5-1 I - k
MOTE
w e+r.= ..[ •a[r
CITY OF «.�� r
.�.._ .
.fOPT[f JYf[ t4 IffO I,S+tasr[a•n[n[I�+1•u[w+,e
CITT COUNCIL ofolfAfc[ fa ?Is 'LEGEND-
. •rlfoEO pRo fo. M M�••a!...ter.e�.a e•.w¢r -
HUNTINGTON BEACH - tY[ D[D —
....,o T,f •r mr.u... .IKIea. w,reer
7 t0 Y ,!s
' " ""ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ' o�•r""""""'�"'•'""
Q-...if M1 Y RwOf.IV<yao.rwlr w,rrar
•.+} n]] SQ KlfwTaa raOff.t.wltARr•[aAlapr
AMEMMD BY ZONE CASE' - :-F-�* •is ®a[a[rrow.era.va corer
IM.117,OR.Iff.■7,sa-43,N-)t.T-.f..?I-"G.Pr 7O-4.711-17444. !-l-73 'o -
Q.e-7s !C!,
left -
.i.e BOISA - - - - - -- VIE .. • --
F
I On or
• o
RI I•• -
.IIITT(r - Of 4-
RI o
1
I
L ..,
° I� RI RI 4 RI
T4
rc
tr o
of
[uw
Urr RI $Tin
' r T
RI
IQfTM/ffITMOTON ip IOITM KJRNGTO"
C F—E z cu[TEf wwric PI.f �.. o:fTER 7vaaPc /LY1
f
MOLD"EX.".-.r.m tr
- cr-c RA -
CENT p
I I JE,M. ROS i LEY \ •'•1 ROS -no �.
• i i .
W • ■laf[raKwr. ele�wr[-e7 I
C 2
w[Rnr[-er
•I ! w a..reran r-
W [I.lrafY•-w1f y
EDINGER r AVE �a.a-.
EnIBIT A '
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HLAnW N M
Douglas LaBelle, Tom Andrusky, J4
To Deputy City Administrator From Project Manager - RedeveL
SURVEY OF USERS OF THE January 8, 1986
Subject SOUTHERN PACIFIC FREIGHT Date
LINE SPUR THAT PARALLELS
GOTHARD
I have made contact with- _
1.• James Lumber
2. Reliable Wholesale Lumber
3. Levitz GA =26_L3
4. Far West Fir Sales
5. Ideal Pallet System Inc.
6. Randall Lumber
Company
Questions 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Can they terminate their rail NO NO NO NO NO NO
service and truck in their goods?
2. If not, do they foresee a time NO NO NO NO NO NO
in the immediate future when they
will be able to terminate rail
service?
3. If not, would they be willing to NO NO NO NO NO NO
have their goods delivered to a
new rail terminal constructed north
of the 405 Freeway where they could
pick up their goods and truck them
to their facility via a new Hoover/
Gothard connection?
4. If their property is adjacent to NO NO POS NO POS POS
the existing railroad property and
the rail line was abandoned, would
they be interested in acquiring the
railroad parcel adjacent to their
property in order to expand their
facility?
` It is my conclusion that as of this writing retirement of the freight car railroad spur south of
Bolsa is not probable because the lumber yards and others want and need access to the rail line.
It is possible that with the passage of time conditions and attitudes could change.
January 8, 1986
SURVEY OF USERS OF THE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC FREIGHT
LINE SPUR THAT PARALLELS
GOTHARD
Page 2
It is .my recommendation that we continue to request Southern Pacific to participate in
installing the rubberized crossings.
TA:ajh
182 7h
cc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Paul Cook, Public Works Director
Les Evans, City Engineer
Jim Palin, Development Services Director
Pat Spencer, Program ;Manager
.Howard Zelefskv, Associate Planner
Chrono File
TA Working Copy
CONTACTS AND FREIGHT CAR ACTIVITY January, 2, 1986
James Lumber Co. 5 cars per day, 5 days per week one third of
17311 Nicols Street all deliveries by rail.
Phone 714-847-8511
Contact person - Jim Harrington
Reliable Wholesale, Lumber Inc. Approximately 21 cars per week. Eight
7600 Redondo Circle percent of deliveries by rail.
Phone 714-848-8222
Contact person - Jerry Higman
Far West Fir Sales :fictive 6 days per week average of 3 cars
16300 Gothard per day. Approximately 936 cars per year.
Phone 714-842=6681
Contact person - John Weston
Randall Lumber 20 cars per week 5 days per week 4 cars per
17322 Gothard day over fifty percent deliveries by rail.
Phone 714-848-8555 -
Contact person - Ralph Cardwell
Levitz Furniture 8 cars per month most deliveries by truck.
7441 Edinger Avenue Would use rail if rates were less than truck
Phone 714-894-5381 rates.
Contact person - March ,toe
Traffic Manager
Ideal Pallett System Inc. Needs rail. Did not wish to discuss
7422 Cedar Avenue frequency on phone. Said he would respond
Phone 714-847-9657 to a letter. If needed I will send letter.
Contact person - Mr. Marmelstein
SUM?dARY OF FREIGHT CAR ACTIVITY
4,414 per year, 368 per month, 92 per week. The railroad reports that this pattern has been
steady over the past three years.
1828h
CITY OF HUNTINGTON 'BEACH
LJINTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HLWrurcrar K
To Tom Andrusky From Douglas La Bell
Project Manager Deputy City Admi. ' � oator
Subject SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Date December 13, 1985
LIVE RETIRF-MENT
Tom, please pursue the four questions raised by Paul in the attached
memo: Let's discuss as you feel appropriate; thanks, Doug.
DLB:lp .
Attachment
xc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator
Jim Palin, Development Services Director
Paul Cook, Public Works Director
Les Evans, City Engineer
Pat Spencer, Program Manager
H +�4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS
HLNTIWOON{EACH
To Doug La Belle From Paul CookGLY
Subject Retirement of the Southern Date December 5, 1985
Pacific Railroad Line
I have talked to Mr . Stewart who sent the attached letter
regarding the possibility of retiring the Southern Pacific
railroad line south of .the 405 Freeway .
He stated that the line could not be retired as long as one
of their current customers insisted on service. He listed
their customers as the following Huntington Beach companies :
1 . James Lumber
2 . Reliable Wholesale Lumber
3 . Levitz.
4 . Far West Fir Sales
5 . Ideal Pallet System, Inc .
6 . Randall Lumber
I would suggest that you assign someone from your office
to interview the owners or general managers of these
companies to "determine the -following:
1 . Can they terminate their rail service and
truck in their goods? -
2 . If not, do, they foresee a time in the immediate
future when they will be able to terminate rail
service?
3 . If not, would they be willing to have their goods
delivered to a new rail terminal constructed
north of the 405 Freeway where they could
pick up their goods and truck them to their -
facility via a new Hoover/Go thard connection?
4 . If their property is adjacent to the existing
railroad property and the rail line was
abandoned, would they be interested in
acquiring the railroad parcel adjacent to
their property in order to expand their
facility:
If, after interviewing these railroad customers , you find
that retirement of the line in the foreseeable future is
viable, we can begin negotiating with the railroad regarding
acquisition of their right of way, which may be enticing to
them since they are in deep financial trouble, and, if
Memo to Doug La Belle
Retirement of the Southern
Pacific Railroad Line
December 5, 1985
Page 2
.. . . necessary, the construction of a rail terminal on their
property north of the 405 Freeway .
. If retirement of their line does not appear feasible, I
will continue to push them to rubberize their seven
street crossings along this line which the City Council
directed us to pursue."
Please expedite this matter and keep me informed of your
progress .
PEC :lw
cc: Charles Thompson
Jim Palin
Les Evans
Tom Andrusky
%outhern Pacific
Transportation Company
610 South Main Street • Los Angeles,California 90014
..A. .RAM•TwrrWA (213) 629-6409
...Ip MAL.r•,"sn. a■pUT.Ltwa■..ru To
O.J_SKA . Hunting on 3each/323
A•.I.Ta FIT•.•IOMAL•M•IMttt
J.N. $L*AN
..•IOMAL 11 OI 7 OAMA...
CAVIL November 18, 1985
.<aIOMAL r OF V WAMAaf.
Mr. Paul E. Cook
Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Iftin Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
SGBJECT: Proposed Installation of Rubberized Crossings on:
(Priority) Slater Avenue - BAA 521.09
Talbert Avenue - BA1h521.59
Edinger Avenue - BAA-519.59
McFadden Avenue - BU-519.09
'darner Avenue - BAA 520.59
Heil-Avenue - BAA-520.09
Center Avenue BAA-519•33
Lear :dr. Cock:
I have been unable to make the Yield. survey required on subject
crossings to enable preparation of the detail specification sheet reTL*ed
for your submission to the rubber companies for their bid invitations.
With the potential lapse of the building boom within the next few
years, eliminating the present haul of building materials, this branch line,
southerly of the San Diego Freeway, will be a likely candidate for retirement
and removal.
Iy superiors have questioned the potential high cost of installing
the rubber crossings for the possible short term duration of the trackage
versus the approximate 20 year life of a rubber crossing..
Therefore, prior to aW further work for a rubber crossing installation,
request consideration be made to above and your advice as to city's proposal for
the subject crossings.
Yours truly,
Donald J. Skaff
• Stewart
•^ sistant cMagineer
• i IyOJ
1 Public Projects
lqurr II crmm BaAcH. CALIR+.
(� „�'
Csp.JTON
I �
---
er •wD.oem lmeaW.-.ours
CHAJOIR AND ow•..wv..Ofror.v
.......... i
TgY•K MD1Y-1Ni _
Rq
7i
r >,OD_u.aDD f I
1
;I
12.000_25,000 `I
® tS.000-A.ODORRERERERR -
1I
..1..Dw..aryl. -; ....... I:
---- ,
•IOOD CO.d•NOl
I �I
:::: •LODD CONT.D.G+...+El I.VRAk7
. IN.DEDU.TEI-DRAINED AREA
-
�
i I ` I I 1 �.• � i t 1� i � i t
huntington beach development services department
STA f f
_REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: December 17 , 1985
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2/NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. 85-72
1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No . 85-2 and recommend adoption to the City
Council .
2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 85-2 is a request by the
Department of Development Services to realign Gothard Street south
of McFadden Avenue . The proposed alignment would move the current
center line of Gothard Street eastward approximately 250 feet and
align that portion of Gothard, 600 feet south of McFadden Avenue .
The purpose of the realignment is to align Gothard Street with the
proposed extension of" Gothard to the north through to Hoover Street .. .
3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time ,
the Department of Development Services posted Draft Negative
Declaration No . 85-72 for 10 days , and .-no comments , either verbal or
written were received . The staff in its initial study of the
project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued for
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 85-2 . Prior to any action on
the Precise Plan of Street Alignment , it is necessary for the
Planning Commission to act on Negative Declaration No . 85-72 .
4 .0 COASTAL STATUS :
Not applicable .
5 .0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS :
Gothard Street between Center Drive and McFadden Avenue is within
the boundaries of the Huntington Center Commercial District
Redevelopment Plan . One of the proposed improvements for the
A-F M-238
infrastructure included "Realignment of Gothard Street to Bolsa
Avenue, and the construction of an - off ramp on the I-405 Freeway at
Gothard. ' Precise Plan No . 85-2 is an initial step toward realizing
that goal .
6 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN:
Not applicable .
7 . 0 SUBDIVISION CCMMITTEE:
Not applicable .
8 .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 is intended as an initial
step toward resolving the circulation problems identified by the
Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment Plan . Gothard
Street is a four lane secondary arterial with a 80 foot right-of-way
with current traffic counts estimated at 16 ,600 vehicle trips per
day.
The staff is introducing the Precise Plan at this time in response
to Southern Pacific Railroad 's plan to lease a portion of its
property for development . The lessee of the property has indicated
to City staff a desire to develop the entire parcel adjacent to the
realignment which would conflict with the -City 's future plans for
Gothard Street . Staff has indicated to the lessee that temporary
structures at the north end of the railroad property (see
attachments ) would be acceptable , with permanent structures at the
southern portion . It should also be noted that the Southern Pacific
Railroad has indicated to staff that their branch line south of
I-405 is a potential candidate for retirement .
The realignment of Gothard Street would require the purchasing of
approximately 48 , 000 square feet ( 80 feet x 600 feet ) with a
resulting vascationing of the same area (former Gothard Street ) .
Staff has been in contact with the City of Westminister to ascertain
their concerns with regard to the ..subject matter . Their staff
supports the Precise Plan as proposed, however they did mention no
formal City Council position has been reached. Staff should also
point out that the realignment of Gothard Street may result in the
modification of a traffic signal serving Vermont Street in the City
of Westminister .
9 .0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Precise Plan
of Street Alignment No . 85-2/Negative Declaration No . 85-72 and
recommend adoption to the City Council .
Staff Report - 12/17/85 -2- ( 3887d)
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Area map
2. Ordinance
.3 . Negative Declaration No. 85--72
4 . PPSA- Diagram
JWP:HZ :kla
19,I17/85 -3- ( 3887
\ Ctty W W[SIM'NSrEP
qJr
\ \ RI
n IT,
, �L L COII Mn
\ \ 4\ .1\ RI �i }L C ay..
I API 4. RI \\ RI �ii.IGI Ill
21 U
Or -
RI
t
R I
NMTTII IIIMi M(II 4N71T4 14MTMGfPN
r-_r f N[[n Srfr 1, LAM C[NvfRSrf CrIC ['LAN -
. cr_F - - -
n er l7 �.—
1 I9 MI ROS ROS
N
C4 [
E FnNr.F R AVE
iRINTINGIEHJ BIA04
HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION
t: R4� .;r M:ifs ,•Y.,wr'�:r•+a i wr f,.' •-•.ii�v`r .�.,
r, x !
�=+ . .haw...t� l �'.r�► i! . i t '.: '�.•' � ''X�`� ,+'�
Mor
•.rya: � `,i y. � � rr.. •��' �t,�-
'C
Z
+ f
• � -� •"� t. �4 Jl 71t1 .ys� "�.. �i-• � M
Art
, 4
/, �. 44
r•• '�:4 .t. t nr.,7Y�.wi I 1.' }'1.1F ,s+�'T '.,�y � i r •5'•�^y # �� / [ � �� �.
. R .j.f uC r. ,:.. '•'"P ,Y�, _ �' r+ 't�.'�,'Ri'.'�yfrr .a"11�� li. .:� "y � `►
si+ t''[ 1 '•h !�' 'it! ci'• ''� v ..4 r f�,�� ��YS..:1� •+y�F� ..Rc.�l'•�
c.. �� i M1 �. + I+ f 7 * ;R l..:;v. ., .: •.. .._M v S-YMMY•••.�ii.y'7a�-01'. �1:'��,�� s�
1IN
�s i 1 i3 • c's f�..fu3.� ( \•` .. ,• ..,s - - �1Y't's- •;'. r.r� r � ti+ra.:,rM � a
'�µ � 39y r« xrf s :'" '' 'a t�' �"+ s�r s . w ;' r1 r •
Z • -ice /' if.� >f�.e�".,(� y tr .� s .y, i', 't r
.. t . 1 9 f. sj.4f y ♦' 'a. ad�1_Rft1 W r a♦ JI,'�#i
't _ y.tl, • r r�'� ,i�1 ,;T r"r��'ii9f' � � y�} �a ��' -...:.� a •a i0t iii; r s�'� �+ •'
r� y. 1 . oti ,. . r J' • r 5;�• �`I YY,. tits- ..7s J' F�� Y..if�'r Ja���Ia Jr:.R{,. .;� Y•:.'• 't �.>:l�'�,f,�Jt4r 4t:s'�. �'4f sY -'^r S • y I •
M�. ,LL .•� -.�.',i?.It '° A Y'��'`�l►•�iR: S �'•-q'��� .Y�:F.�F��a*-a;� ._ ,r- +. :4:tii.i�. t
v*e� ; �s ra:. g`F '`; #�f�Cr+;-°��� �. !",�+L`.Z•'� r S?�il4''.`le
'.r •.�, :�R ti� �y:r + M _-[
,� .+�i,i. „#,�,i..' ,n.,R," .+s iti �,+.,. �,, t.e;,9".. „�i•�►at, �...:4• t- �rcr+j'�•�,�:.R-
rL' d..'. i� 'r r" �'l?. '+'.��• 5 �•.- j 41, i�� 'fit.... •i
�;q � ci t�'+ •rl r�.-s�r.,a��`4'�'r��. � ,�••�t��� .!�p"�s. _ l��tt������♦y�'c•�t,:. a'�' e�.q.. + +{
�:�?.� :•'� z�*'���''��� '..["'�1'��.i ,�(;'�'�L1�J+. :+ t i,Ry= .:tir Y, �•..... �l:J�' ' ,.y"�I�1}.•�.• _'' sue— - t�^. O :.
• •'•r .Y .r.'f. •r, .......aut...L..s.:.._...: ... .__. ... .. .. . ........ ._... _..,..:.;+.. ... :1 .,.- -�--�=^s�..---�.r:�-: -----._. .mob- ,, i
. t , ` � '_4�.:rA�:1�t+roA'6•Yr 1.=:.�.w r .. . ,r:';r:.'•�rG Yam. �`�Jr� =,^�!.ids' "�S✓,a�q;1�y%�! i►+!'r,!~tr.;;-�
N t o t s.si5:., '. f: . �'J. k r N .r �•;��'� r y(s�., ' s�4
y •'��, '_►r t mar p_,�
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
*.**TWGTON WACH
To From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
Howard Zelefsky SECTION
Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date
NO'85-72 12-5-85
Applicant: City of Huntington Beach
Request:
A Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Gothard Street
Location:
Between Center and McFadden Ave.
Background
Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a- Draft Negative Declaration
was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk
for a 10•day public review period ending 12-15.-85
and no comments, `� the attached comments were received.
Recommendation
The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the
approve Negative Dec ar%tion o. s_-,
finding that the propose wi project ll not have a significant adverse a ect on
the environment.
Mitigation Measures
The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects
resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval .
Respectfully submitted,
Diana Teran Blaisure
Assistant Planner
JRB/dc
ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
IN, _AL STUDY OF -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAc;S
I . BACKGROUND
1. Applicant City of Huntington Beach 2. Address 2000 Main St. , Huntington Beach
_ 3, Telephone
4. project Locati S be},,
� � d��-,�,.ee�-L�®nt.es and �IcFar?riPn
ti. Project Title ��rin • i��nR�e�se= Rlan_.of Street Alignment
0. Da to - 4�2 -5 8 5
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are requ,irAd
on attached sheet) .
* 1 . Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical
environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora ant
fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical . Yes Maybe ri/ No Other
2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from 'the
surrounding enviro ment? i .e. , natural environment; manmade environment. Yes
Maybe No
3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re-
sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following
areas: firl-e pol • e, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes
Maybe No
4. Impacts on Traffic rculation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move-
ment, or im3oct—sarroynding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes
Maybe _r o
* 5. Will the roject esult in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on
the exists . land use, populatioeo
ousing, energy/utilities, natural resources,
himian heal th?.. Yes Maybe
E;. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet) .
III . OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED
( ) See Attached ( ) Not Applicable.
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe
2. Will project achieve sh rt-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term envirormen-a'
goals? Yes Maybe Jr No
3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? Yes Maybe No
4. Will the projecLlo
ad rsely affect human beings either directly or indirectly'
Yes Maybe
V. DETERMINATION
( ) Negative Declaration
(�Q Negative Declaration With Mitigation
( )•) Environmental Impact Report
DATE /O� f SIGNATURE ., •
* See attached
POTENTIAL IMPACTS
#1 - The realignment will bring Gothard closer to an
#5 apartment complex which would be south of McFadden
and just east of the realigned Gothard. The proximity
of the traffic has the potential of increasing air and
noise impacts on the adjacent apartments. It is
recommended that a traffic study be prepared .to estimate
the existing potential impacts as well as potential
impacts .in the future as traffic increase in that
area. Based on the results of the traffic study,
appropriate mitigation measures should be proposed to
reduce environmental impacts on the residential area.
A47
Southern Ca/lfornla Edison Company
7333 13OLSA AVENUE
WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92663
February 13 , 1986
H. W. COMPTON - TELEPHONE
CUSYOMER SERVICE MANAGER 1714)895-0271
Charles W. Thompson
City Administrator
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA
SUBJECT: Precise Plan Street
Alignment No. 85-2
Gothard Realignment
Dear Charles :
In regard to the Gothard Street realignment, we do have some
specific concerns, as it impacts our 220kv Transmission Line
right-of-way.
The proposed crossing of our right-of-way requires a
considerable amount of our property to be used for street
purposes. This surface use will preclude any future use of
this property for our operating needs , i.e. towers, poles,
or other types of electrical facilities we might need.
This right-of-way is a vital part of our transmission system
and cannot be jeopardized in any way.
We would like to meet and discuss the merits of the Gothard
Realignment, so we may be able respond in a more effective
manner to the proposal.
At this time, we are not prepared to make any decision
regarding the project.
Sincerely,
HWC\kam '
cc. .Douglas N. LaBelle
Paul Cook HUNTINGTON BEACH
James Palin DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Thomas Andrusky
FEB 1 4 IuK;
Huntington Beach. CA 92643
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECOND BY LIVENGOOD, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-64 WITH FINDINGS AND ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir
NOES: Schumacher
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL:
1 . 'The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 85-64 for the
addition of a second unit (not to exceed 650 square feet ) will
not be detrimental to the health , safety and welfare of the
community.
2 . The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 85-64 will
substantially comply with the requirements of Article 9103 of
the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code .
3 . The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 85-64 for the
addition of a second unit to a single family dwelling is
consistent with the Master Plan of Land Use and the development
standards of the Huntington Peach Ordinance Code .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . The site plan and floor plan dated . January 31 , 1986 shall be
the approved layout .
2 . The applicant shall submit revised elevations (specifically
roof line) which illustrates a unified whole between the
existing single family home and proposed second unit . Said
elevation shall be approved by the Department of Development
Services prior to issuance of building permits .
3 . The additional unit shall comply with all applicable provisions
of the Huntington Beach Fire and Building Code.
C-2 PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NO. 85-72
Applicant: City of Huntington Beach
On February 4 , 1986 , the Planning Commission continued Precise Plan
of Street Alignment 85-2 until February 19, 1986 in order for staff
to solicit written responses from the Edison Company, Westminister
School District , and Pacific Railroad - as to their position on the
City 's proposal for realignment.
PC Minutes - 2/19/86 -3- (4290d)
The Huntington Center Redevelopment Project Area Manager sent out
letters to the agencies identified by the Planning. Commission .
Additionally, the Department of Public Works revised the legal
description for the Precise Plan of Street Alignment so that Gothard
Street does not cross the railroad right-of-way but is aligned
adjacent to a line five (5 ) feet westerly to the line of the
right-of-way. The staff 's position is to maintain 40 feet clearance
adjacent to the railroad right of way in order to accommodate future
light rail .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Letter from Southern Pacific Transportation Company, owner and
operator of the railroad line located south of the San Diego Freeway
known as the Stanton Branch , was read into the records ; confirming
that they had no intention of abandoning rail operations over the .
said right-of-way.
Ron Pattinson spoke in opposition to the realignment . He feels that
it is not economically feasible or responsible to the citizens of
Huntington Beach . He feels the citizens of Westminister would be
impacted tremendously by this project .
Stephen Chase, attorney for Southern- Pacific Transportation Company,
spoke in opposition to the realignment . He feels that his client
has been delayed enough already by this proposal . If the City is
interested in acquiring the property they should do it now.
Bill Compton, Area Manager from the Southern California Edison
Company, was not sure what the impact might- be in terms of the
realignment . There are two towers involved with the realignment on
the northern side of McFadden that would be entailed . The
transmission corridor is there to maintain their transmission
lines . It is a vital link to their total electrical transmission
system and they are concerned about losing any more property in that
area . Would like to see a more precise plan than what has been
offered to date to insure that it doesn ' t have the kind of impact
that it appears to have to the operation .
Commissioner Erskine asked Mr . Compton if he had to make a decision
today regarding the realignment, what would it be.
Mr . Compton replied that there would be major costs that would have
to be borne by the relocation agency (millions of dollars to
relocate towers ) . He would not say absolutely no, but it would take
a considerable amount of planning to accommodate the realignment .
Orin G. Berge, spoke in opposition to the realignment . The project
is decades late in being proposed and -it would be too costly to the
City to align a street that will eventually dead-end at Garden Grove
Boulevard . It will also be a costly, expensive impact on the
surrounding environment .
PC Minutes - 2/19/86 -4- (4290d )
There were no other persons to speak for or against the project and
the Public Hearing was closed.
Les Evans responded to some of the questions of the Commissioners .
He stated that the width of the alignment right-of-way was 80 feet .
The main problems would be getting under the freeway bridge. Even
though there is a 115 foot span, the railroad is in the middle of
the span . If the span needs to be widened or the underpass
reworked, the City would be faced with spending millions of
dollars . The only place that they would consider narrowing would be
the underpass . It would be cheaper to acquire the property bare,
today, then to wait until something else is built . "
Relocation of the transmission towers would not be necessary. The
right-of-way would be crossed but would not take up that much room.
There would be no adverse impact to our circulation by realigning
Gothard, it ' would not make it any better or any worse, according to
Mr . Evans .
The road can be built from Center to McFadden for about one half
million dollars . There would be about $100 ,000 in signal
modifications . A total of approximately $700 ,000 (not including
acquisition of the Edison right-of-way) would be the cost, he added.
Cal Trans has been contacted and they have indicated that it is
feasible that on/off ramps. on Gothard would help with traffic
problems . This area of Gothard handles about 16 ,000 vehicles per
day and it could handle 40 ,000 vehicles per day . The on/off ramps
are very possible.
Commissioner Porter asked how the City proposed to spend money
outside of the City limits or redevelopment area since the majority
of the expense is not in the construction in the street but to the
modification to the overpass and rail alignment . He felt that two
actions were in order . First to approve the negative declaration
and then to table the alignment proposal until such time that the
City of Westminister and the City of Huntington Beach can reach some
decision of what they plan to do.
Staff recommended that an action of denial be considered, since they
would like to get this proposal up to the City Council so that
acquisition of property for the right-of-way could be started.
Commissioner Rowe stated that if we were going to Gothard as a means
of alleviating traffic problems , it is far more desirable to do it
now while it is vacant land instead of increasing the cost when we
might have to remove buildings or structures . An investment now can
turn out to be wise in terms .of preparing the ways for the future
when it might be well more costly. He felt that serious
consideration should be given to the precise alignment of Gothard as
recommended.
PC Minutes - 2/19/86 -5- (4290d)
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECOND BY SCHUMACHER, TO APPROVE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-72 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Winchell , Schumacher , Winchell , Livengood, Erskine,
Porter , Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECOND BY SCHUMACHER, TO APPROVE
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 86-2 AND RECOMMEND ITS ADOPTION
TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher
NOES: Livengood, Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION FAILS
Commissioner Mirjahangir voted against .the motion because he did not
feel he was ready to vote on the issue, he is not convinced that
this realignment will save the City headaches down the line .
Commissioner Erskine voted against the motion because he is
convinced that it will cause the City problems down the line and a
whole lot of dollars expended in litigation .
Commissioner Porter voted against the motion because he thinks that
the ,City Councils of both Huntington Beach and Westminister have to
resolve this issue first, before the Commission or City Council
decides on a precise plan of alignment . He would like to have the
issue tabled.
Commissoner Livengood stated he could not vote on the motion because
the applicant has gone through an involved process for a long period
of time, and based on the testimony given and the fact that the
presentation was not clear .
Commissioner Schumacher wanted Gothard moved over to the central
area of the open space so that fewer houses. would have to be
removed. She felt it was much easier to look to the future and plan
to not allow development that the City may have to end up having to
pay for .
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO DENY PRECISE
PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 86-2 WITH FINDINGS (UNCERTAINTY OF THE
,COST OF PROVIDING THE RIGHT OF WAY, ETC. ) BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
PC Minutes - 2/19/86 -6- (4290d )
AYES: Erskine, Porter , Mirjahangir , Livengood
NOES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
Winchell : Requested a Minority Report be attached reflecting the
concerns of the Commissioners voting against the denial .
C-3 PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF THE BOLSA CHICA LINEAR PARK
Applicant : City of Huntington Beach
Planning efforts for the Bolsa Chica Linear .Park have been on-going
between the City and County since June 1977 . Previously, the
Planning Commissioners received a copy of a report entitled, "The
Bolsa Chica Linear Regional Park Boundary Study" prepared by the
Orange County Environmental Management Agency. This document set
forth the goals and objectives of the linear park and inventoried
each of the twelve parcels of land which will eventually become the
linear park . The County did not have a precise boundary for parcels
2, 4 and 5, owned by the Huntington Beach Company . The County
requested that the City aid them in establishing the park boundary
for these areas.
After meeting with representatives of the Huntington Beach Company,
touring the site and analyzing topographic maps , staff developed a
"Conceptual Boundary" for the linear park . Factors which influenced
the location of the proposed conceptual boundary included
o Adequate width of the park on top of the bluff to
accommodate a minimum of two recreational trails ( 4% grade
for trails desired)
o Buffer areas surrounding each oil operation
o Inclusion of areas which offer scenic vista points which
overlooking the Bolsa Chica
o Inclusion of large, relatively flat areas which may be
suitable for parking or staging facilities
o Adequate setbacks from the bluff faces
The'. linear park , as proposed by staff, encompasses approximately 120
acres of land . The Huntington Beach Company owns approximately 35
acres within the park , Signal Oil owns approximately 60 acres, the
City of Huntington Beach owns approximately 35 acres , and the
Southern California Edison Company owns approximately 1 acre .
Staff 's boundary was approved by the Community Services Commission
on January 8, 1986.
PC Minutes - 2/19/86 -7- (4290d )
Mara 6, 1986
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE: Monday, March 17, 1986
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: -Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2.
LOCATION: Gothard Street between McFadden Avenue and Center Drive
PROPOSAL: A request by the City of Huntington Beach to move the
centerline of Gothard Street eastward approximately 250
feet for the portion of Gothard which extends 600 feet
south of McFadden Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 85-72 will also be
considered in conjunction with Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No. 85-2.
ON FILE: The proposed plan and a legal description is on file with
the Department of Development Services
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405
Dated March 5, 1986
Publish
/ A J czl, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE: 1'` �T[
APPLICATION NUMBER:T fCC s P 16v1 or- Q� WICIKI- N b ' 8 S-Z
LOCATION: d Yud &&vvmY'�' ��C�[!� ` ► C/yji(� Gli1? (�
PROPOSAL: U -1J. �" 6 n IV
QQ VV
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: ' / G
ON FILE:
/ 1 V 4 Sh-71 -e�CiM GCtt et/Y� /V 6 , g S^ 7 2
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City'Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405
Bob. Ge�zfrid �' Earl French, Jr. Elizabeth Arossman
7352 Rockmont Ave. - 7351 Rockmont Ave. 17042 Beach Blvd.. .,.
Westminster, CA 92683. ; Westminister, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA -92647
i
Attn: -Chris Christiansen ' Attn: Donald Stuckey Sherco
City of Westminster ' Westminster School Dist. 11611 San 6icente Blvd
Unit 505
8200 Westminster Blvd. ' 14121 Cedarwood Ave.
Westminster, CA 92683 , Westminster, CA 92683 Los Angeles, CA 90049
' Ken! Gale
Ronald R. Pattison .&.Ass.o. ' Huntington Center
18600 Main St. Ste:= 280-- ' 10100 Santa Monica Blvd. So. Sac. Trans. Co......._
' 610 S. Main St., Rm. 600
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 , Suite 2400
Los Anglees-, CA 90067 Los Angeles, CA 90014
Frank. H. Hoffman, Jr. Tr. ' SARM Enterprises Bill Compton, Area Mgr.
200 112th Ave.,45-700 Camino Del Req ; N.E. #213 Southern Ca Edison
Indian Wells, CA _ 92260 , Bellevue, WA 98004 .7333 Bolsa Evenue
Westminster, CA 92683-5294
One Pacific Plaza Coast Community College William Dalton
7777 Center Avenue,-STe.-'308 2701 Fairview Rd. 3800 Sandune Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 , Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
Mercury Savings & Loan Assn. , Steven V. Hunt William 0. Petersen
P.O. Box .1010 910 Strand 1339 26th St.
Huntington.Beaeh, CA 92647 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Santa Monica, CA 90404
Mobil 91il Corp. DLN Realty Corp Bredero Huntington Beach, Inc
P.O. Box 2122 "/.Angeles Home Improve Ctr.
% Bredero Consulting
Los Angeles, CA 94051 6915 E. Slauson Avenue 2415 CAmpus Dr. Ste., 205
City of Commerce, 8A 90040 Irvine, CA 92715
American Savings & Loan Assn.
Harold V. -Bragg Alfred P. Cha&ie, Tr. 15725 E. Whittier Blvd.
-`5549 E. 6th Street 1419 Amalfi Dr. Whittier, CA 90607
Long Beach, CA 90814 . , Pacific Palisades, CA 90273
Leon DePicciotto, Tr:
Didier Camilleri Charles L. Applehury, Tr.
140- N. -Fuller -Avenue 7945,'Aldrich Avenue 9.0. Box 56
�F. Los Angeles, CA 90036 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683
MDonald Group LTD Montgomery Ward Otto D. Wolman
Broadway-Hale Stores Dev. Corp., Tax Div. 18-S . 1533 Wilshire Blvd. #201
Tax Dept. 1 Montgomery Ward Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90017
5550 Flower Street Chicago, I1 60671
Los -Angeles, CA 90071
Elizabeth Grossman
1704.2 Beach Blvd.
Huntington 'Beach,' :CA 92647
W o wl Cam,-ate
IS
CIL-
Ax
333—�Uo f�
l� i�� G-a
Ndl— . G 1
1 fZl�o (;;ft -
d�
1N L&i
Co Cij CA, 1. ).
t.------
HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PARCEL NO./ OWNERS ZIP
TRACT NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER
SUBAREA "A"
142-271-04 PETERSEN, WILLIAM O.
04-022 1339 26TH STREET
SANTA MONICA, CA. 90404
142-271-05 HOFFMAN, FRANK H. J R. TR
04-022 45-700 CAMINO DEL REY
INDIAN WELLS, CA 92260
SUBAREA "B"
142-071-54 COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE
04-010 DIST
2701 FAIRVIEW RD
COSTA MESA, CA 92626
See Map for railroad and
Utility Right-of-Way
SUBAREA NCO
142-342-12 BREDERO HUNTINGTON BEACH
04-010 INC
% BREDERO CONSULTING
2415 CAMPUS DRIVE
SUITE 205
IRVINE, CA 92715
142-342-13 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA
04-010 7777 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 308
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-342-14 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-342-15 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE ,
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-342-16 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
0382H
h _
i
1
AWL
HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PARCEL NO./ OWNERS ZIP
TRACT NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER
SUBAREA "D" (Cont1d)
142-071-80 HUNTINGTON CENTER
04-010 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD
SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
142-071-81 HUNTINGTON CENTER
04-010 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD
SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
• See Map for Utility Right-of-Way
SUBAREA "E"
142-I 12-05 HUNT, V. STEPHEN
04-010 910 STRAND
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254
142-112-07 HUNTINGTON BEACH #1
04-010 P.O. BOX 2114
SANTA MONICA, CA 90406
SUBAREA OF"
142-111-18 SARM ENTERPRISES
04-010 200 112TH AVENUE NE #213
BELLEVUE, WA 98004
142-111-24 AMERICAN SAVINGS & LOAN
04-010 ASSN
15725 E WHITTIER BLVD
WHITTIER, CA 90607
142-111-27 MERCURY SAVINGS & LOAN
04-010 ASSN
P.O. BOX 1010
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-III-32 SARM ENTERPRISES
04-010 200 112TH AVENUE NE #213
BELLEVUE, WA 98004
142-111-34 DLN REALTY CORP
04-010 % ANGELES HOME IMPROVE CTR
6915 E SLAUSON AVENUE
CITY OF COMMERCE, CA 90040
0382H
w
1" 25'S-Esc 4_. f ,,tt F- t 3
rr UNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PARCEL NO,/ OWNERS ZIP
TRACT NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER
SUBAREA "G"
142-081-01 MOBIL OIL CORP
04-01 0 P.O. BOX 2122
LOS ANGELES, CA 90051
142-081-07 CHAMIE, ALFRED P. TR
04-010 1419 AMALFI DRIVE
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA. 90272
142-081-03 C.HAMIE, ALFRED P. TR
04-010 14.19 AMALFI DRIVE
PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272
142-081-06 APPLEBURY, CHARLES L. TR
04-01 0 P.O. BOX 56 -
WESTMINSTER, CA 92683
142-081-09 DALTON, WILLIAM D.
04-010 3800 SANDUNE LANE
CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
142-081-10 DALTON, WILLIAM D.
04-010 3800 SANDUNE LANE
CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
142-081-11 DALTON, WILLIAM D.
04-010 3800 SANDUNE LANE
CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
142-081-12 DALTON, WILLIAM D.
04-010 3800 SANDUNE LANE
CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
142-081-16 B RAGG, HAROLD V.
04-010 5540 E 6TH STREET
LONG BEACH, CA 90814
142-081-17 CAMILLERI, DID1ER
04-010 7945 ALDRICH AVENUE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-081-18 GROSSMAN, ELISA13ETH
04-010 17042 BEACH BLVD
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
0382H
HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PARCEL NO./ OWNERS ZIP
TRACT NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER
SUBAREA "G" (Cont'd)
142-081-25 DE PICCIOTTO, LEON TR
04-010 140 N FULLER AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90036
142-081-26 GROSSMAN, ELISABETH .
04-010 17042 BEACH BLVD
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-081-27 WOLMAN, OT.TO D.
04-010 1533 WILSHIRE BLVD #201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
142-081-28 SHERCO
04-010 11611 SAN VICENTE BLVD
UNIT 505
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049
0382H
HUNTINGTON CENTER COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PARCEL NO./ OWNERS ZIP
TRACT NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TELEPHONE NUMBER
SUBAREA "Cu (Cont'd)
142-342-17 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA -TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
142-342-18 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . 92647
142-342-19 ONE PACIFIC PLAZA TWO
04-010 7400 CENTER AVENUE
SUITE 200
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
SUBAREA ND"
142-071-53 MAC DONALD GROUP LTD
04-010 BROADWAY—HALE STORES
TAX DEPT
5550 FLOWER STREET
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
142-071-58 MONTGOMERY WARD
04-010 DEVELOPMENT CORP
TAX DIV 18—S
I MONTGOMERY WARD PLAZA
CHICAGO, IL 60671
142-071-59 HUNTINGTON CENTER
04-010 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD
SUITE 2400
LOS ANGELES, CA 90067
142-071-60 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
04-010 CITY HALL
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
142-071-61 HUNTINGTON CENTER
04-010 STANDARD OIL CO OF CALIF
PROPERTY TAX DIV
225 BUSH STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
0382H
( See Ord . No . 2827 )
RESOLUTION NO. 5647
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2, THE ALIGNMENT OF
GOTHARD STREET, SOUTH OF .MC FADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach has
held one public hearing in compliance with California Government
Code in order to consider and review Precise Plan of Street Align-
ment No. 85-2; and
The City Council has determined that said precise plan will
protect the public health and safety of the inhabitants of the
city and allow for an orderly development of the community; and
The Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment
Project Area Plan has as one of its primary goals to improve
vehicular circulation through the realignment of Gothard Street in
order to connect with Hoover Street,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach hereby approves said Precise Plan of
Street Alignment No . 85-2.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th
day of May 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
)-17-
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City A istrat9rr Director of Dev Lopmen
Services
REVISED
GOTHAM S2'RgT
Centerline Description from Center Street to McFadden Avenue
Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel 1, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 169, pages 45 and 46, Parcel Maps, said corner
being the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 500.00 feet; thence northerly and,easterly along
said curve througr, a central angle of 45000100" . An arc distance
of 392.70 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 44020'
07", east 271.52 feet along said tangent line to a point on a
tangent curve, said curve being concave to the northwest and
having a radius of 895.00 feet; thence easterly and northerly
a.lorig said curve through a central angle of 44059'42", an arc
distance of 702.85 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence
north 0039135" west 140.34 feet along said tangent line to the
point of te.-mination.
F
Res. No. 5647
` STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNrINGTON BEACH )
1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19 th day
of May 1986 by the following vote:
AWES: Councilmen:
Kelly. Finley . Mandic . Green
NOES: Councilmen.
Thnmac
NOT VOTING : Bailey
ABSENT: Councilmen:
MacAllister
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
e vru U . ,
RESOLUTION NO. 5647
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PRECISE PLAN OF
STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2, THE ALIGNMENT OF
GOTHARD STREET, SOUTH OF MC FADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach has
held one public hearing in compliance with California Government
Code in order to consider and review Precise Plan of Street Align-
ment No. 85-2; and
The City Council has determined that said precise plan will
protect the public health and safety of the inhabitants of the
City and allow- for' an- orderly development of the community; and
The Huntington Center Commercial District Redevelopment
Project Area Plan has as one of its primary goals to improve
vehicular circulation through the realignment of Gothard Street in
order to connect with Hoover Street,
NON .% '"HEREFORE, BE IT RESO LVED that the City Council of the
City of lntington Beach hereby" approves say: Prec=se Flan of
Street Alignment No . 85-2.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th
day of May 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City A ._ istrat 9rr Director of ev lopmen
Services
REVISED
GDTHAIO STF=
Centerline Description from Center Street to McFadden Avenue
Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel 1, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 169, pages 45 and 46, Parcel Maps, said corner
being the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly and having
a radius of 500.00 feet; thence northerly and,easterly along
said curve t=ugs, a central angle of 45000'00" . An arc cistance
of 392.70 feet to a point on a tangent line; thence north 44020'
07", east 271.52 feet along said tangent Line to a point on a
tangent curve, said cv--ve being concave to the mrthwest and
having a re-ius of 895.00 feet; the.ice easterly and northerly
ai0ng said curve through a central angle of 4405942", an arc
distance of 702.85 feet to a point on a tangent dine; thence
north 0039135" west 140.34 feet along said tangent line to the
Doint of termination.
J_
Res- No- 5647
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUMN OF ORANGE ) sa:
CITY OF HM INGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WEMWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at s regular - - - meeting thereof- held on the 2 9 t h day
of May 1986 by the fcllowing vote
APES: Councilmen:
KPIlY . Finley . Nandic . Green
NOES: Councilmen:
Thoma�;
NOT VOTING : Bailey
ABSENT: Councilmen:
MacAllister
J �
City Cleri: and ex-officic C'_eri:
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington. beach, California
R
ORDINANCE NO. 2827
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY
AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 15 TO INCLUDE PRECISE
PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 85-2 TO REALIGN
GOTHARD STREET SOUTH OF MCFADDEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning Law,
particularly California Government code sections 65453 et seq. ,
the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach,,after
notice duly given, held a public hearing on December 17, 1985 to
consider Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 to move that
portion of the existing centerline of Gothard Street, extending
six hundred ( 600) feet south of McFadden Avenue, approximately 250
feet; and
On MArrh 17 , 1Q96 1986, after notice duly given,
hearing was held before this Council, and the matter having been
considered, the Council finds that said Precise Plan of Street
Alignment No. 85-2 is reasonably necessary to the orderly and
efficient flow of traffic, for the preservation of the health and
safety of the inhabitants of the city, and for the orderly
development of the community.
,a.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. That the real property hereinafter described and
shown on the map marked Exhibit A, attached hereto, incorporated
herein and by this reference, is hereby designated and adopted as
Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 85-2 of the City of
Huntington Beach:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Parcel 1, as
shown on a map recorded in Book 169, pages 45 and 46,
Parcel Maps, said corner being the beginning of a
curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of
500.00 feet; thence northerly and easterly along said
curve through a central angle of 45000 ' 00" . An arc -
distance of 392 .70 feet to a point on a tangent line;
thence north 44020 '07" , east 271. 52 feet along said
tangent line to a point on a tangent curve,- said
curve being concave to the northwest and having a
radius of 895.00 feet; thence easterly and northerly
along said curve through a central angle of
44059' 42" , an arc distance of 702 .85 feet to a
point on a tangent line; thence north 0039 ' 35" west
140.34 feet along said tangent line to the point of
termination.
SECTION 2 . District Map No. 15 (Sectional District Map
14-5-11) is hereby amended to show the realignment of that portion
of the existing centerline of Gothard Street, extending six (600)
feet south of McFadden Avenue, by moving such centerline
approximately 250 feet.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of 1986.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: I ITIATED AND D:
City Administrator Director of 5evelopment
Services
�c. ZONING DM 15
SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5-1 10
-
NOTE
{ CITY OF D.•�Dxr.D�,x,xe.x..,D^.o ...
u IgT[e„D��To.e kT[xD TD Tx[et x.ff
ADOPTED ,TUNE W.
19t0
E1T7 COUNCIL DRDINANCE' NO. 776 LEGEND-
' �sR.OL[ rfr�r REMDeNa d,TrcT
AMENDED ORD NO ♦M N R N L�pxr r.MNKTUDW wTrc7
—IUNTINGTON BEACH t 6.60 79D �wuaT .afar.. DUT.c+
I.5.61 all
:26 —W{T'CDOMERCIAL DISTRICT
3-20-61 62
.-27.6: 629 —"-fLTNCk LIME
7-3-67
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .. 1333 Qcorrarx•r r4nuntf lt9ucrtroxlon*441T
16-69 1544 J REYDFxlIA ]W[ULlaR4l DgTRIC!
T-TQ n33 "DEDI Ttp PMCM PL,w W VIHR ET 1LpIr w
AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: t• aI 636
OS RE CM 4l Dx4 OMx pt4CE WT.CT
114.IIT,132,166,167.66-43,69-32,71-46A,71-480.PP 70-6,72-37,01-2. 2-5-73 1B05
12.15-75 2026 -
S.1-61 2499
�e1
BOLSA AVE ,
cc
{ I 44 I a
CRr OF _WEST MINSTEP --
i. r{WHITNEY , DR
RI
\\
yi
i r Mj �� ' I
Or WEST.,NSTED
i ^ ]ue4a �L�IJI
CITY r \ Rj u�NSTEF
�-r-R j
12
\q
iRes
NORTH HUNTINGTON �o;NORTH HUNTNGTON
C r-^
EB CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN%y CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN
I::oLL::•:W ":t..- :,. Gr •\
o Ui �
-RA .,. I
CENTER
►71R,M1 ROS R r--as - . ROS Ri `g\
W xlxR.l,T,r �I ; C4 .I. �J,
3
�
2 S-
0 it C 4 �' Llyo a:xto•oa f,"R-{::,,' p m
a"3 EDINGER AVE
EXHIBIT A
Ord ----vo. 2827
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s:
x CITY OF HUNTINGTON;BEACH )
{q3
1
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing ordinance was read-to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 19th day of May
19 86 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of June 19 86 and
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of
all the members of said City Council.
AYES: Councilmen:
Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Green
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
Thomas
ABSTAINED Bailey
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
I