The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPublic Works Department - Miscellaneous Documents - Safety M ;1 SAFETY MANUAL Four entry, Innspecticn _ .An* d W©irk In ." confined Spaces � r. Ob AP -�� L We rvim " 'untington each NO , r t i i ,�,r Confined Spaces Safety Manual Table of Contents INTRODUCTION I Chapter 1 -Cenral . 1 Confined Spaces -Defined 1 Tests 1 Safety Procedures 1 Terms 3 =a ' ChVttgr 2 -Hazards Pnd Hazardous Situations 4 Hazards 4 Hazardous Situations 4 Safety ProcedAres 5 Chapter 3 -Equipment 7 s Respiratory Equipment 7 Blowers 7 Harness 7 Life Line 7 Test Instruments 7 Traffic Delineators a Ladder 8 Heist 8 ' First Aid a ' Chav)ter 4 -Training and Personnel 9 - Responsible Supervisor 9 ` Personnel 9 Training 10 Risk Management Divlslon 11) First Aid 10 Chapter 5 - Entry Into Confined Spaces 11 Personal Equipment 11 Vehicles l: No Smoking 11 Entry and Exit 11 Tests 11 Life Lines 12 Starxiby Employee and Communications 12 ! . Respiratory Equipment 12. Artificial Respiration 12 Work Periods 12 Lighting 1? Chapter 6 -Continuous Inspection 13 Chapter 7 - Spot Inspection 15 `� Chapter a - Tunnel Inspection 16 Chapter 9 -Respiratory Equipment 17 Inspection 17 Cleaning 17 Chapter 10 - Emergency Rescue 18 Chapter 11 - Use of City Vehicles 19 Chapter 12 -Purgir.-] Confined Spaces 20 0 Chapter 13 - Special"Equipment 21 Internal Combustion Exhaust Eml"lon Control 21 Compressors for Supplying Air 21 Air Line Couplings 21 Chapter 14 -Checklist System 22 Confined Space Pre-work List 23 Confined Space Classification cable 24 Gas Hazards Table 25 APPENDIX E ^ Figure Continuous Inspection(4 Man Crew) Figure 2 Continuous Inspection(6 Man Crew) t; Figure 3 Sp,t Inspection i Figure r, Complete Ventilation Figure 5 Incomplete Ventilation iD ;J INTRODUCTION Work performed In confined epoces and/or work requiring the wear and use of respiratory equipment Is regulated by government coder. Generally OSHA (CFR Sec. 1910.134) governs respirator; pratectlen •,.and California DIS Construction Safety Orders (Section 1532)governs work In confined spaces. �? The Intent of this Manual Is to comply with the philosophy of good safety practice and the explicit requirements of'safety orders and to exceed the CAL/OSHA Safety Orders where y ], added protection is warranted. y' It`is.te City's policy for work performed In confined spaces to: reduce the number of einployees exposed to hazardow situations; maintain continuous cornmunIcstlans with workers Inside .confined spaces; require a two-man "buddy" system for persorx l . proceeding through closed storm drains and tunnels; and to provide safety and emergency equipment and training In its'use. i. I i� 1. t Y r Chapter 1 -General Thee safety Instructions apply to all City of Huntington Beach employees performing work within a confined space. A. Confined Spaces-Defined For the putpaees of this manual, confined spaces includes the Interior of`storm drains, rwbdralms sewers, vaults, utility pipelines; manholes, penstocks, stilling wells, pump stations, tunnels, catch basins over •Ax feet In depth, or any n structure which is similarly surrounded by confining s►.Tfsaxs wi as to pe:mtt the f accumulation of dangerous gases or vapor or the exclusion of oxygen. E. Tests L Teats for the presence of combustible or dangerous gases shall be made with an approved device Immediately prior to a worker entering a 7. confined space and at intervals frequent enough to Insure a safe . atmosphere during the time a worker is in such a structure+ �. 2. Confined spaces that contain or that have contained combustible gases or dangerous gases shall be tested after theca gates have been cleared before being entered without approved respirator equipment. ` 3. Sources of Ignition sha!1 be prehibital in any confined Spam until after the:' atmusphere within the area :has been tested and .found safe: SMOKING shall be prohibited In a confined sparxs or within ten feet cf the 'r entrance to such an area at all times. r� G Safetj Procedures 2 r L Employe," assigned to work In or Inspect a confined apace that Is or may become hazardous, shall be trained In the use of all safety equipment recrilred by this manual. 'Leadworkers and/or supervisors shall-be :geld accountable fo*the training of subordinates. L Employees shall not: be permitted to enter or remain within a confined space until it Is free of harmful cuncentrations of dangermn gases unless they wear proper respiratory equipment. 3. Before work Is performed In a confined apace, provisions shall be made for ready entry and exit. 4. An approved wifety belt with a life line attached, or other approved d-avice, shall be used by employees equipped with respiratory equipment as required within confined spaces; such safety belt and life line shall also be 0. required when employees are riot equipped with respiratory equipment, if the possibility exists that the confined space may become hazardous At i . ;east one employee shall standby on the outside while employees are Inside, ready to give assistance In cage of emergency. 1 I. f S. If entry Is through a top opening, the safety belt shall be of the harness type that suspends a person In an upright positiu-'s and shall have a safety line'attached.. The other end of the llne shall be securod outside the entry opening. If entry In through a top opening, at least one employee shall standby on the outside while employees are Inside, ready to give assistance In case of an emergency. 6. Employees assigned to operate blowers'(portable ventilation or exhaust) ` shall have no other duties while performing this function. 7. There shall.be."at least two workers an the job equipped with approved respiratory equipment. 8. Only. safety llghtirig shall be used In confined spaces subject.' to contamination by flammable or explosive liquids or gases. 9. The opening to a confined space shall always be properly .Identified or guarded by worker Is open. 10. Except :In extreme. emergenclos Involving Imminent. peril - tv ..life, employees shall not be permitted to work without respiratory equipment i where the oxygen content , of the air.Is less than 19-112 -Percent.by volume. This level Is determined at what point oxygen is to support j normal con sclouanesa. -i I ' 1 i. vl 1/ I I. 2 MON- A i I I 'L.� :Yilt•f,l t M ."// ♦�Y. t.•iM . ww .... .. r.. . .. . .. • . ..... .. ...... r. .+ .r«.r.1w..I..r.r/r•�.wirwrw.r....a.. r+ Y' .:•:�\ TERMS NOTE - The term "approved' and "permlasible". mean epproved or�"pecmissible by the City of Huntington Beach in accordance with tl:e Ir*tructions, rules, or orders of the State of California DIvialun of Induatr;al Safety. The term "wear" with respect to respiratory equipment•means that the - equipment is In Ube, with the face piece or hood In plar_e and air being supplied The term "equipped" mans that the equipmer« Is being carried but Is not being used to furnish air. I Q 3 4 M1♦I I I I JI i n . Chapter 2-Hazards and Hazardou:Situations A. Hazards Normal oxygen content of the atmosphere is 20 percent to 21 percent; below 16percent a persona reflexes slow and his judgment becomes inaccurate. At 12 percent to 16 percent, permanent brain damage may occur. At less than 12 percent, death I^i almost certain and Instantaneous. Many flammable gases are heavier than air and will remain dormant, presenting a serious fire and explosion hazard. Toxic gases may kill Instantaneously.: Some. are colorless, odorless, tasteless, and In some cases only a mliwte quantity Ins required for Instant death. 1. Gas Form no Combustible gases Include natural gas, propane, petroleum gas, manufactured gas, marsh gas, kerosene, fuel oils„ butadiene and benzol. b. Carbon Monoxide c. Hydrogen Sulphide d. Chlorine i• e. Ammonia f. Steam 2. LiquidFo m a. Gasoline, solvents, cleaning fluI4 crude oil, acid, tort water, etc. b. Chemicals used for pesticide, etc. 3. Solid Form Waste materials from markets, bakeries, loundries, servica st,ations, etc. 4. Cxygen Deficiency_ Improper ventilation In confined spaces can reduce We normal oxygen content of the atmosphere. B. Hazardous Situations It Is impractical to attempt to list all hazards and hazardous situatimi in this manual that ca;i or do exist in confined spaces, but a few common or more familiar types Are provided to make a worker alert. L Presence of any of the hazards stated In Section A above. 2. Increuse In volume of run-off In a drainage system caused by a break in a 'I water line, dumping a! a swimming pool or pond, lain discharges, and oilier similar large bodies of water. 4 I I . i I I I { i 3. Manhole shaft damaged- steps bent or missing. 4. Storm drain plugged an the upstream side of a work area with possible water upstream of the plugged section. 5. Ponded watev in a drainage system or sump may contain hydrogen sulphide. 6. opening flap gates in a subdrainage system may release harmful gases. 7. If fire equipment stops near a work area, one should check the exact 4 location of atoy water discharge to ensure that work area Is not In the course of water flow. C. Safely Procedures Z. Every reasonable effort shall be taken to insure the safety of the worker In all situations. 2. 1140 worker shall be required or knowingly permitted to work in'an unsafe space,:unless for the purpose of making It safe and then only after pro}:sr precautions have been taken to protect the worker. 3. Prior to the start of work, a thorough survey of the conditians of the site shall be made.to determine the predictable hazards to employees and the kind and extent of safeguards necessary to perform the work. In a safe manner.'. 4. If by test instruments there IS Indication that a hazard exists, no employee shall enter a confined space until that hazard has been cleared. ' 5. If any employee at the site believes there is a reasonable doubt about the safety of a confined space, the worker shall wear approved respiratory protective equipment and use all safety equipment needed for entry as described In this manual 6. If a hazard Is detected: a. Combustible gas should be reported to the City Yard's radio dispatcher. The dispatcher shall report the same ts: the fire : department. b. Other hazards or hazardous situations shag be reported to the City Yard's radio dispatcher. fhe radio dispatcher shall at once Notify appropriate supervisor of such a condition who will direct all further wa,*. Q c. No confined space in which a hazard has been identified shall be re-entered without approved respiratory equipment until the space has been tested and proven clear fer a crew to work. d. if tests Indicate that a manhole shaft contalits combustible gas, it must be opened 22.11 with a four-pound rawhide face hammer and a J manhole lifter. When lifting such a manhole cover, workers should stand away from the shaft and avoid breathing any cscsping gas. 5 I i �rrrr.YM":+;i::it(.•., .... ♦. .. .. ,'Y. •. ♦ - .. ..... .. .. .. _ ... ,.. ... ..- ....r.w....r...�.. � �../...s,. e. The space shall be ventilated for five minutes after being opened. (See Chapter 12, page 31.) f. If necessary, ventlIstors shall be supplied and maintained so that the air in the space contains sufficient oxygen to support normal consciousness. Appropriate tests shill' be made frequently by the person In charge to ascertain that such conditions are maintained. I a f t V I. ' I �� II r • I j r'1 Chapter Equipment A. Sefety-unit vehicle' for t;ie purpose of this manual means a vehicle equipped with an amber rotating or osculating-type warning light, two-way radio, and the following emergency safety equipment. 1. Respiratory Eq iiement a. Employees entering the confined spaces,.,_shall be protected ..by approved self-contained air tank-type respirators`'or supplied, air respiratory equipment with not less than five-minute air. capacity. Supervisors and/or crewleaders will'be K-ld accountable for checkirxg equipment, air:.apply for possible malfunctions. b. Oxygen tanks shall NEVER be used to replace a compressed ^.lr tank. c. Air tanks shall NEVER be filled from an air compressor as In a service station or shop, but they shall be fled from equipment designed and designated for such a function. d. Avoid releasing ALL the air from ale tanks at any time as moisture will yet Into tanks making It inoperable or InefficIent 2. Blowers One 12-volt D.C. or 110-volt A.C. electric-drive blowers with a sock and all necessary electrical connectors on the vehicle. This type of bowers should be at least'750-c.f.m. output. 3. Harne-ss One safety vest harness for each person Lhat might be required to enter a confined space at any one time. This harness must be of t.`te type that 1 will suspend a person In an upright position, have an attachn)P-nt for a life line and Is able to support 340 pounds on a 4-foot drop. ; 7 4. Lifer Line a. Life line (rope) capable of supporting a worker If one end Is secured to a substantial object. b. The life line shall be polypropylene or nonstatic nylon rope and shall support 1,000 pounds with an elongation not to exceed 5 percent 5. Test Instruments r a. Combustible gas/oxygen deficiency meter. b. Toxic gases and vapors detector. 1 c. When repair crews are working In a confined space, monitoring for hazardous gaups shall be made cantinuoualy as the situation warrants. 7 ��sti.#.f.�A•/.rr r...n4 _ - .. �,•^ • r. ..r...... ....n..r� n .... •.. rn. ...y. • Ia t • + . �i • d. Continuous monitoring for hazardous gases shall be made during "Continuous Inspection" or "Tunnel Inspections" of storm 04ains, sewers, tunnels, or similar extended areas. 6. Traffic Delineators ' a. Shall be established so a3 to comply with Chapter 5b of the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook- Watch". 7. Ladder ;;0 a. Fiberglass ladder may be used as a substitute for a wood ladder, but' at no time shall any metal ladder which can conduct an electrical current be used. " .j b. All personnel, when performing work within a roaeway, shall be wearing orange traffic vests. Failure to .comply with this section ' shall result in disciplinary action. S. Hoist A han&porfered hoist, capable of lifting a worker from a confined space, shall be on the Safefy-unit at ail times. 4. First Aid r . a- There shall be first aid materials readily available for workers on :i every job. b. Such materials shall be kept in a sanitary and usable condition. A frequent inspection shall be made with replacement materials added s. as necessary. �F+ , r i Ei i C ngter 4 - TrainIpS and Personnel A. Responsible §uRervisor Supervisors) a:s responsible for the following: L Safety training meetings, emergency drllls, and demonstrations of safety equipment and materials used in confined spaces. Z. All safety equipment and materials designated for use it., confined spades including: a. Weekly Inspection of ell safety equipment. b. Weekly report of any repairs made or needed on safety equipment. 3. Keeping current ale dated safety materials. 4. Assisting in Inspection of work In confined spaces if needed. B. Pemnnnel 1. Only physically fit employees who have been specially trained shall be 'a allowed to enter or work in confined spaces that are or may become hazardous. Z. Employees not trained for work in confined spaces under Chapter 4C will be permitted to enter and work In confined spaces only when: a. The confined space has been tested and Inspection for dangerous conditions and declared safe from hazardous conditions by a qualified Inspector(qualified under Chapter 4C� b. The entry is for purposes of performing work that Is limited to that specific confined space. s c. Tha employees have been Instructed 17 the ut,e of respiratory equipment. d. A trained worker is continuously in the Immediate area of the confined space monitoring hazardous gas levels. 1 D 3. Employees heIng considered for employment and/or assignment to confined spaces, ehould be acreened for and made aware of the following: a. Working conditions In confined spaces(watch for claustrophobia. D b. Fear of wearing masks, hoods, or constructive equipment. � % i c. Fear of Insects or makes. NOTE: The term fear means a "morbid' fear where, if an employee l Is subjected to conditions that create euch a fear, his reactions could do physical harm in himself or others In the Immediate area. 9 l . A I I SC ,4 �.� ri/. • :7 .v. ....1. .1"'l f _ .. ,. ,. .... . -.,. ..,. v....... .., ♦. '... ..,.. .....I.U-+.;.r+.•.wr,.•NIM•s...�.�..wrwtia.r'r-..-..,N .,i.1w. C. Tra" inina 1. Before being allowed to enter a confined spaue an employae shall: a. Be Instructed and trained In the use and care and have demonstrated competence In using: 1) All test equipment used by the City. 2) All resplrntory equipment used by the City. 3) Safety harness. , A I 4) Life Linos. 5) Hoist. .ti 6) Ear protection devices. b. Have received a copy and studied this manual In its entirety. ' c. Passed a written or an oral test on the orders and directives covered 1 by this manual. 2. Employees successfully completing. the above,,,.requirements shall bQ designated as qualified to enter, Inspect, and work In confined'spaces. A 1. ` record. of-.an employee's training and testing will be maintained 'ln his personnel file. 3. Emergency drills and demonstrations of safety. equipment will ' be conducted for employees qualified to work in confined spaces. D. Personnel Division The,Personnel Division will devolop the training program as described'above'and provide training materials and tests to supervisors. The Personnel Division shall provide assistance to supervisors ab requested. i E. First Aid All members of each craw entering a confined space shall be certified In First Aid and CPR by the Amefican Red Cross. i 4 10 . ti � .r•w..+�.Mti.w+.+.w.V+N.br�nw.�w.r r.�r.... w.r44wrAYr VYwr rw•+�.r.....�........��.r .w�.w+i�i�Y1G6MM.M�.�.MIgM{M i Chapter 5 • Entry Into Confined Spaces A. Personal Equipment - Each crew member entering a confined apace shall be equipped with the following equipment: 7 L Hard Hat 2. Safety Vest Harness . r� 3. Approved Hand Light 4. Gloves , 5. 'Rubber Boots - Approved Type 6. Respiratory Equlpment 1. Life Line li. Whistle .9. Two-way underground hand held radio(for continuous Inepection only). B. Vehicles The Safety-unit vehicle shall be'parked between moving trefflc end�an:opening to a confined spacewhcci'the opening`Is"Ina street, highway, ur:other traveled 'areas.;, The,,vehicla*'will have an oscillating or 'ratary. ember,,warntng;`light operating.,!Also,;traffic cones and high-rise flags must be-placed 'to'warn and direct traffic' around the ataridirlg vehicle. All ,vehiclua shall,'contnln4ttie •American Public Works Handbook entitled, 'Work Area Traffic Control Handbook", all redirection of traffic shall can ply with the proviclons of`thiis ' handbook. C. No S making There,shall be no.smoking within ten feet of any entrance to a`confined space. 'T Smoking shall be prohibited within a confined space. D. Entry and Exit ,' r� Before work is performed in a confined space, pro'lelons'shall be made for ready entry and exit. E. Teats L The Interior of a confined space (both at the surface and Invert)'must be D rested, if possible before Its cover is removed for: a. Combustible Gas b. Carbon Dioxide or Oxygen Deficiency k U. c. Carbon Monoxide d. Hydrogen Sulfide • i jl 2. If the'11tests cannot be made before removing the cover, precautions •shrill be taken while removing the cover. Tests must be made before entry, Including the bottom of the confined space. 3. If a confined space Indicates hazardous gases or a' lack of oxygen; it shall be purged In accordance with the Instruction In Chapter 12, Page 31. F. Life Lines 1. A life line; secured nutside,.w �•iilbe attached to the safety harnass during descent and ascent through a top opening. 2. For spot Inspection,the lifo line must remain attached at all times,while a worker Is In a confined space. 3. For continuous'Inspections,'the lifeline attac;ied outside wIil+be detached upon.reach "an Invert and attached befo;a beginning ascent,from, an irivert. (See'Chapter GA and BA for use of life lines during continuous and tunnel Inspections.) G. Standby Emplokee and Coni'munications 1. At least ona employee shall standby.on the outside, while'employees are inside a confined space,,ready to jive assistance In case of an emergency. . 2. Licensed radio equipment,euitable for underground•use shall be used for continuous. comm.. unication between workers underground and standby employees perfori'ning Continuous inspections. 3. If an•_underground radio is not, available ,for' use durIn" continuous Inspections then communication will be by voice, sight or whistle. H. Respiratory Equipment When,conditions in a`confined;,space are such that employees 'within it are O required to;we3ar•;,respiratory equipment; there! shall be at least two-men on the " job. equipped wjth` approved respiratory equipment, :`exclusive of the blower r operator:and atetndby employees. Employees assigned to operate blowers shall have no other duties. .,. L Artificial Re velration •At• least' one person trained and'certlfled'by .. credible agency'of Personnel Division's• choice shell, be Immediately . available to, administer artificial respiration. .while, work Is beirig performed Inside a confined space when respiratory equipment Is being worn. a J. Work Periods All .work„shall, be..arranged . In. short periods In any " conflned. -space when atmospheric,conditions are nauseating or where prolonged ex"posure to such conditions would be harmful to workmen. '�. K. Lighting Only':approved safety lighting shall', be used In confined spaces subject to . contamination by flammable or explosive liquids or gases. 12 '• . . �, ---,__._-__..._. .____ ._.. -- ...,..........._,--.--._._.- __ ••• •:fir • �. t ti, J[ 1 1: Chapter 6 - Cant lnuu6 Inspection A. 'A continuous inspection Is where an Inspection crew enters one ,oponing' of a i confined space and. exits through another. (See Figure 1 for placement of personnel and equipment.) 1. Manhole openings Nos. 1 and 2 are protected by vehicles and rralfic .1 safety cones. "i 2. Manhole openings Noe. 1 and 2 are tested and opened, f� 3. Radio repeater geer is lowered to inverts'at Nos. 1 and 2. 4. Workers. B •and AC, ,with appropriate safety equipment (Chapter 5 A2) r descend to Invert of rnenhoie No. 1, and release life lines to surface. 5. Radio commLniication between above and underground is established. j J 6. After.worker D lies detierminedthat No: Z.menhole'`and invert""ece free of hazardous'gases, 8•and C,'joined by.a life line,and not closer• than 3D;feet ` to each other;'proceed to manhole'Invert,No 2.: The'leading'¢rew'member as with meter .will I perform contindoua,'man itoring for cambustlble,0508 as he proceeds. Testing for Hydrogen Sulphide will be conducted as necessary In suaplcious areas. The second crew member will`Inspect'and ` record. 7. As B and tC approach_manhole No..2, worker'A Is notified.''He retrieves.. radio repeater equipment, closes manhole No. 1, and proceeds to manhole t No.3. ` ~ a. At manhola'No.�3; worker A per forms traffic prote•ctlon procedurea, tests :! and opens the manhole, and lowers the radio cspeater'equipment. W6ikcrs '! B and C, shall not advance townrd manhole No. 3 until worker A Informs them that It Is clear. J. 9. Steps 6 and 8 are repeated to the completion of the Job. �. Be .1 an `undergraurd;redlo system is'r'not: available; theme six;man;crew will be• a3signed. The.two addttlonal crew:members.will be stationed:at the inverts of t: l; the manholes between•whlch the inspectors are proceeding. (See Figure 2."for placement'ot personnel and equipment.) 2i ' 1. Manhole'.openings No. 1 and No. 2 are protected by vehicular and traffic ,f 1 i safety cones. 2. Manhole openings No. 1 and No. 2 are tested and opened. 3. Workers 8, C; and-E with''appropriate safety equipment (Chapter SA2), 1 descend to Invert of manhole No. 1. 4. 'After workers D and F have determined that No. 2 manhole and Invert are {' free of hazards, F descends to Invert and signals B "and C'to advance. 5. Workers B end C;`;joined by.a life"'llne and not closer'than"30 feet to each otherp'proceed,to�manhole In Na,2� The leading 'crew member yirith gas meter will perform continuous monitoring for combustlbla gases as Ins i. proceeds.. Testing for Hydrogen Sulphlde will be.'conducted as necessary ' In suspicious areas. The second crew member will Inspect and record. 6. As B and C approach manhole No. 2, Workers E and & are notified. They close manhole No. 1, and proceed to manhole No. 3. 7. At manhole ,No. 3, Workers A and E perform„ *,raffie '-protection procedures,. test -and open the manhole, and E descends, to the Invert. Workers B and C shall not advance toward manhole No. 3 until Worker E Informs them that it is clear. d.. Steps 5 through 7 are repeated to the completion of tho job. 1. r ',. - r - •.k. - :_' '.. } .. .. C. The ,two inspectors sha11 not advance into or' through a hazardous',sltuatlon (described in.Chapter 2) unless"wearing approved respiratory equipment. Crew members must be alert at all times for Increases In water flow or other hazards. 7 '0 .Y 14 .J - J • Chapter 7 - Spot Inspection A. A.spot inspection is where a worker or Inspector enters and exits a confined space through the same opening. (See Figure 3 for placement of personnel and equipment.) 1. The opening Is protected by a Safety-unit vehicle and tra"ffic cones. 2. The manhole opening Is tested and opened. 3. If the confined space has been sealed'or had;no ventlletion prior to:Its X opening, It must be purged as Instructed In Chapter 12. Ff 4. Two workera,'if space permits, with appropriate equipment descend Into the confined space and perform necessary work or Inspections. ' 5. If the aixe.of.a confined"space permits only one worker, then'the second } worker shall standby'ln full safety equipment ready to assist. 6. Safety herriess witFi*.life line attached and secured outside shall be worn while within the confined space If entry Is from the top. :l _44, f ry f. .t .�.�....,,.�.� w"�•"'M"r•++.t.4 *.++.+ww++�..M.rlMiyt�M.�MfMRtMR? ` �____s Chapter 6 -% ,el Innpg6tIon A. k tunnel inspection Is where a work o, upectlon crew enters a confined space; proceedsi through to Its and performing inspections or work end'thenreturns to the original opening to exit. 1. Each crew member working in or inspecting a tunnel shall wear or use the personal equipment listed In Chapter 5A2. 2. Before entry the opening will be tested. �. 3. Workers B and C joined by © life 'line and"not closer than 3C feet to each other,;proceod'to the end of"the tunnel. The.leading'crew member with gas meter will perform continuous monitoring for hazardous gases and lack of oxygen as he proceeds. f� i ' r 4 16 �. .. �� .. ,_ ....�«..�� ..� _,. ... warw.w+«a«..'w�w�».�..«^'^..'.w.'r'rs.'W+vC•A:CiW.t/tA�7.iM1S.4Mi:MM6n. Chaaeter 9 Reapicetory Equipment A. Inspection j 1. All respirators shall be Inspected'routinely before and after use by leading '-1 crew member. 2. A respirator that W'hoi t routinely 'used but is kept ready lfor emergency use shall be'inspected after,each use and at'least monthly by erewleader or supervisor to assurithat It Ie In a satisfactory working condition. n. . 3. Rpl`r'etory : Inspection aha11 i es nclude , a check , of the .tightness of connectl6ne -and the conditions of the face plece,' headbank, valves, connecting tube, 'dM'.cannieters. .,Rubber or., olastomer parts shall be Inspected for pliability and'signs of deterloratloiu 4. A record ahall:be kept by-lending crew member of irspectlon detea and O : flndings`for'•reepirators maintained for emergency use. Th3 record shall ' ` be kept In the r,spirator case. j B. Cleaning 1. Routinely.'used respirators shall be collected, 'Cleaned, and,dialnfected`as frequently as necessary to Insure that pniper protection*ls'proy16d. 2. Each worker.'should�be brlefed on the cleanlrig' procedure.and be assured .that he will always receive a cleaned and disinfected respirator. 3. Respirators ':Malnteirned for emergency use shall be cleaned and 03 disinfected after each Use. 4. Soap and water'are the only materials needed to clean respirators. .'r O 17 �....�� ,. ...... ,..w..........�,,.+a-a.wi...i.w..c.w..i�1r,�•a..v...+.....sw+.'�G�.:LAS4t,Y::.�lYw:a.+�`i+lAYh'iif+wrw ii7lrt�'7►Cffli�+'o"" „r r.ry.r+.'R S.bw T''',,,rlrf'» rt,w. .t n.. +s •. .. _ .... • .wn•..r r•w!r•I! 14 n Chapter 10 - Emergency Rescue A. Each..emergency will be different and It ,Is. difficult' to •develop speciflc procedures for every situation. However, generei 'emargency procedures ceii•be ormutated and each crew can anticipate and practice a variety,,of specific emergencies.. Such emergency sltuatuions will be practiced during regular emergency drill sessions. B. General Emergency Procedures A 1. Upon becoming aware of a hazard, workers within a confined spaces a. "Immediately "don and activate breathing apparatus if the emergency Is hazardous gas. b. Notify. others of this emergency by''us Jng .the' undacground redlo, giving details-as to the nature'of,hazard, location, Injuries, other problems, and the manhole from which'they plan to exit. C. If possible, exit from the hazardous area toward tha nearest exit. j d. If one of. the workers is down, his partner; after doing a. and b., Q should attempt to: 1). Pleca and activate breathing,apparatus on the downed worker If not already done and if It is needed. Z) Assist' hiriv In`,movIng out of the” hazardous area toward .the 0" direction of exiting manhole. 3) Pull him toward the direction of exiting manhole If 'it Is possible to move him. 2. �'Jorkers cuts de ccnflnad apace: The: worker with the Safety-unit vehicle will proceed to the exiting mantiole: i a. Notify the 'dlspatcher on' the radio giving nature and location of emergency,"type and Injury, type of hazard, and.ttie need for a fire 4 a department response. = b.• Move the hoist into position. c. Prepare to lower life lines, reaplrators, etc. Into manholes. 19 J . .,�.�+.r..�..,.+w�.�+r++r+ .,rfi.►u'1J CI,awr.f+.wrva.w�--- — rWM.MwMl.47i"ip/p1KfiL77 f V ...+w.wN. .4.•w.r w r• ..M. -....rr a e..l ... .. ... ........ _.. • \. .{[ W"7J ChaeLer 11 - Use of City Vehicles A. Use of Clty vehicles equipped with amber warning lights. 1. All`work shall be pIannsd'_In advance,to minimlxe'injury.to workmen and the pubUc. Amber warning lights may. be,used. only when a vehicle is stopped on a street or highway in connechon 'With actual construction work, maintenance, liwpection, or other City activity. 2. They may not be used while the vehicle Is In motion. 3. They may not be used when the vehicle is legally perked. 4. When amber, warning lights ere-In use; the:vehicle must be stopped and headed In the same direction of moving traffic. 5. Only :hose vehicles equipped,v{lth the rotating or;oscillating-type warning lights may be stopped In an Intersection or.other location where traffic Is approaching from one aide or both sides of the vehicle. 8. Employees-operating -City vehicles equipped with amber warning lights..are parsonally•.responsible for. compll®nce with the above rules. Failure to do so may subject the employee tot • 1. Disciplinary action under the rules and regulations of the City. 2. Traffic citations and fines which shall not be paid by tha City. A a 19 • r 'tip i • C 1 Chapter 12 - Purging Con',ined Spaces A. Any cnnfiiisd space which has been smaled or which Is not ventilated prior to opening shall be tested for hazardous gases and lack of oxygen before the space Is opened, if possible. Tests of the Invert must also, be made after the space is .;, opened. 0. If a hazardous gas or.lack of oxygen has been .ietectadE by'test in a confined space, it shall be'puryed with forced ventilation for minimum of five minutes and again tested for the presence of the Hazardous condition. 0 C. If hazarduus gases or g lack of'oxygen,coririitloi existed prior. to,'purging, but Is eliminated after purging;; continued forced ventilation shall" be used while workers equipped with respiratory equipment work In the coinfined space. r D. The use of forced vantilation shall not preclude the necessity of .esting. .. E. The ventilator hose shall'not be 'permitted"to-remain In s.conflned space unless the ventilator,, Is working. If the ventfletor is stopped,. the hose shall be removed from the confined space and then purged before being placed back Into ' the confined specie. F. See,Figure Nos..4, and 5 of.. this Chapter for'the suggested correct method-of O ventilating a manhole and the wrong method. C.. The ventilator shall 6o a minimum ten feet from the opening to the confined l ' space at all times. O O a t; .r` •i 0 20 ,r I, r Chp iter 13 - Special Equipment A. Internal Combustion Exhaust Emission Control 1. Exhaust.'purifler 'devices shall be-use d, aupple`mentary to natural or'forced 's dilution ventilation or 'exhaust collection systems, If required to maintain �. the concentrations of dangerous gases or furnes below the maximum + acceptable concentrations. 2. Only approved exhaust purifier devices shall be used to comply with Chapter 1 in confined spaces. w 3. Such equipment shall Fa, equipped at all times when operating In confined spaces with the following: Do An approved respiratory device for use by the equipment operator. •1 b. Ace Inalrument, which, shall automatically sound art alarm to the employee 'operating' the vohlcle, shell I be used to detect carbon monoxide on a continuous monitoring basis. 4. Records of an hourly testing of air while equipment As s working In a confined space shall be kept on the Jobsite by crewleader, leadman or person In charge. B. Compressors for 5upplytnd•Air_'to a•forced air respirator shall be equipped"with necessary safety and etandby devices. A breathing air-type compressor shall•be used. 1. Compre sors shall`lia 'constructed and situated so. mi Ito 'avoid entry-of contaminated ulr•Into the systd"r6 and With',suitable In=lino• air`pu*ifying absorbent beds and filters Installed to further assume breathing air quality. 2. A• receiver: of sufficlent..capaclty';,ta enable the respirator wearer to 1 escape from a contaminated atmosphere in event of compressor failure ' and overheating shall be Installed in the system. 3. If an all-lubrlcated compressor Is used, It shell have high temperatura or carbon monoxide alarm, or both. t 4. If only a high-temperature alarm, is Used, the air from 'the compressor shall be frequently tested for carbon monoxide. C. 'AirnLine Couplings shall bc'incnmpatible with.•`outlets for other gas systems to prevent Inad-artent servicing of air line respirators with nonrespirable gases or oxygen. 21 KT'?S•;�'��::.!` .t� ?-��'�:f.'(:;,.I�ii:-.1:...�a.=3-•:+...1:.'.!.. �+::'ia`t:(c'r-�•:' .:.�.'w.«r i:� tk t t . Chapter 14 -Checklist System Entry lnto'a confined space she!! be made only after all factors are che' ked. :A'cFieckliat, as shown on the next`page;'must be completed that specifles'the location and'type of:wvork to be done, and certifios that all existing hazards have been evaluated by the qualified person, and necessary protective meauures have been taken to insure the safety of each worker. The supervisor or crewlesdar shall be `responsible for completing' the checklist and shall sign off wren the following areas and actions have been reviewed and confirmed; W A. Location and description of the work to be done. B. 'Hazards that may be encountered. C. Complete isolation chacklist. 1. Blanking and/or disconnecting. 2. Electrical lockout. 3. Mechanical lockout. D. Special clothing and equipment. 1. Personal protective equipment and clothing. 2. 'Safety harness and/or lines. 3. Tools approved for use 'in accordance with the Hazardous- Locetlon Classification(NEC-1978). 4. Approved electrical equipment. E. Atmospheric test readings. �. 1. Oxygen level. 2. Flammability and/or explosive levels. ! 3. Toxic substance levels. r� . F. Atmoapherlc monitoring while work Is being performed. G. Personnei t'relning and complete understanding of the hazards. ' K. Standby person(s)as named. L Emergency procedures and location of first aid equipment. This'checklist shall be dated and will tie valid for,one 'shift,only:r;. The checklist shall be submitted to the supervisor .at'the end of.the work shift and will,be i flied such that timely and reliable retrieval is assured. i 22 ^ .:...+.�..++�ww...w.+ ...�.^.. _....�__..� -......w.r.r+....ww.r�..«•..+...a...+.�-.........w.. .�.+...w+.wts;a.awwwMa►Ya,.1+i:�"� A6'. CONFINED SPACE PRE-WORK CHECKLIST Date, Time Location 1. Rio the atmosphere within the confined space Safe been tested for oxygen deficiency and presence of combustible gases or vapors? 7. Has air been blown into the confined space to Safe remove harmful vaoors, gases, or fumes? 3. Is suitable lighting equipment available to Safe give adequate light to the work area? 4. Is 'a safety bait or harness with lifeline Safe attached available if required? 5: Has a helper been assigned to attend the Safe worker who is to enter the confined space? 6. Have permanent ladders been checked to make Safe sure they are safe? 7. Are separate lines and containers available Safe for lowering and raising tools, equipment, and supplies? S. Have precautions been' "taken p 'prevent fires Safe and"explosions? 'this means no sparks and `no " smoking and"use of approved electrical :j equipment. 9. Fps a::rescue. plan.been developed to provide Safe additional help and rescue equipment if required. t - Sum i -(Madwo er or Supery sor i thder.'no circumstances is a confined spac.-.to be entered until preparation as t outlined above has been done and this checklist has been completed and signed. t I hereby. affirm that I have witnessed or otherwise. determined , Ao my satisfaction thet all work designated above has been done and that all , necessary safety precautions have been taken. SIGNED (Person entering confined apace) SIGN (Person'4 nding worker entering confined space) I i J i i j 23 U ti3 .. U: V t COWINED SPACE CLASSIFICATIONI TABLE -ararreters Class A;:.: - Class-8 Class C R Characteristics IrstmsdfA61y-dangerous to Qangerous; but not Potential hazard - requires life :- rescue,procedures ,, immediatelv_'life threatening no modification of work requir3 the,entry of,rro;el rescue:proceduros require' procedures - standard rescue than ene in�ivid�:�al `fully.` . the entry,of no more than' pracsdre's - direct aquioped_with:Ife::suppart'_ one individual fully cartrnunicatian with workers, equiprt,,. - maintenance of equipa_d_with life su000rt from outside the confined j co+nmunication reguiTe ,.an equiament;- indirect visual space. additional. standoy:person' or auditory.._communication stationed-within`the_. with warders, confined`-space:" Nygen 16% or .less 16.1% to' 19:4% 19.5% - 21.4% *(122 mm Hg) or.,.. (122._' 147 mm Fig) *(148 - 163 mm Hg) F greater than 25% or 21.5% to 254 *(190 mm Hg) ,0153 - 190 mm Hg) Flarnnability Characteristics 20% or greater of LFL 10% - 19%' LFL 10% LFL or less Toxicity **IDLH Greater than contamination " Less than contamination level, referenced in 29 CFR level referenced in 29 CFR i Part 1910 Sub Part Z - less Part 1910 Sub Part Z ! than **IDLH * 9ased-upon a total atmospheric pressure of 750 mm Hg sea level . *# Immediately Da serous to'-,Life . or, Health'* as referenced in NI05H Registry of Toxic and Chemical Substances, 'Aanufactur: ; '"ie•nists data sheets;' indtistrial hygiene guides or other recognized authorities. ! !1 i 1 The following guide refers to those gase hazards most frequently encountered when dealing with confined areas: FLN4MABILITY TOXICITY. LOWER EXPLOSIVE THRESHOLD LIMIT } LIMIT (LEL) VALUES (TLV) PHYSICAL . ! GAS % VOLUME % VOLLME CHARACTERISTICS .mBON MONOXIDE 12.5% .005% COLOiiESS CO ODORLESS LIGHTER THAN AIR CARBON DIOXIDE NON-FLAMMAB_E .05% COU]FL6S (02. ODORLESS:, LIGHTER THAN AIR METHANEa% NON-TOXIC CO FLESS CH2 ODORLESS• LIGHTER THAN AIR a f, HYDRO EN SULFIDE 4% .001% COLD FLESS H25 ROTTEN EGG-'ODOR HEAVIER THAN AIR. SULFER DIOXIDE NON-FLAMMABLE .0005.% COLDFL6S;-e,, SQ2 SUFFOCATING"ODOR ' HEAVIER THAN AIR" . 'NITROZN oirx-IUE 'NON-FLAMMABLE .0005% REDDISH BROWN NOZ PUNGENT ODOR ; HEAVIER THAN AIR 25 M Y �h/ik+~,.lOias�w':�eK:uLiJ::�JNfa ns+.swr.u..+.rw..w.++..+—rw...w......r...vw An,..y'r*3.1::•.......;.u.ar�i.a+rnw.w.—w ..w.a...wnrw....�.ww.r�w.+i !t e. R?►Pt4 -�V : RADIO IQSi pro;'._ O '� €• Y - MTMt4A. PNTr- NNA LI �o FigUre 1 OON31N000S' INSPECTION ' FOUR" MAN ,.��EVII Q., f MAN H'c�' i 'p C 0 . E • a I LAM.urn Figure 2 ONTINUO NsPDWI .-ii�AN 'CREW L' .... . . .'`y.t:t', �r+y,...,R+w� tae .�'�µ'+��.• +.ti.:: .. .1;� ._ ... ... � � _ - ,,. :�•i` .. . .. ,1 Figure 3. SRO ' INSPECTION 1 rY Figure 4 COMPLETE VENTILATION $v"T'4A702 MAST Bp- l0 mr ILI � �0. . . •1 r � • ems. .� • � �� e r � •. . • v r �.� • O r, lbI, . . • 0 .O O .� O O �J •r ' .I 4„ �.r+ti»i�J'��'�t,�`"i.L«.Ri i 3..�r�✓"w.i"r5iw%.Ll.t.ai•w:ii:'.�.u4taW M..a.�,sk.r.v.r....[dxw:i aJ.":-.r',.i��•:.aMHw.w«....�—... ..,---.,,.....�....-..w.t se.lE.ns�w+7�xG'.�w4a.atw.w.ws.a. �• •. . ' ZX b I 0 �• ,� ' a • . �`-17 JL— --- �• •O 1 � • Qa p A \ fitumn Vs ob u.f �- Li.i LU t !i♦ IL " t La .LM U. _ f a �� r REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION _--- Date October 2f 198_ 89______ Submitted to: Honorable Ma;,or rind City Council ""?ROVED By CITY COUNCIL /©—� 19 Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator -- Prepafed by.- Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Riblic Works CfTy c eruc Subject: ANNUAL MAINTENANCE DREDGING PERMIT, ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; CC-767 Consistent with CounrAl Policy? NJ Yes I I Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Armlysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actlons,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: i I To obtain a dredging permit for Huntington Harbor Channels, the Army Corps of Engineers requires•an extensive chemical analysis of representative dredge material. RECOMMENDATION: Appibve allocation of fiords to perfnrm chemical analysis, $65,000.00 and contingencies of $10,000.00L ANALYSIS: During the devolopment of Huntington Harbor, vacant lots were sold, with homes•to be huilt at. a later date.*Many lots were left vacant for ten years or more.; In the ensuinq years, rain, wind and other forces eroded the loot causing sediments to run off Into the storm drain system. All Huntington Harbor.stormdraln•systems outfall into channel wharfage areas, causing sediment to•pile in front of and under private boat docks. At,low tide the docks which sattle o #to the sediment huild=up are twisted and damaged.. It is necessary. to dredge the sediment lyJild up at approximately thirty-three (33) outfalls to eliminnto further dock dar*v. The U.S. Army.Corp. of Engineers require a chemical analysis of the drerlge material prior to isguance,of a dredging permit. Therefore, prior to obtaining formal proposals,from testing labs, fund allocation is needed. The required tests include heavy metals, non metals, pesticides and organics for a total of seventeen(l7) different sets of test. A local testing firm has quoted us a price of $2,941.18 for performing the chemical analysis tit each of the seventeen (17) locations.. Sample collection, transportation and reports are an additional $15,000.00 for a total of $65,000.00. FUNDING SOURCE: j General Fund ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not.apply for dredging permit and allow the sediment to continue to build up. ATTACHMENTS: Location map. PEC:LFS:JSH:dw No 5= +.d/4w��+:1:+il�f.L•.+ii`w:s^f.fi'i.'.ff.lv:+('N,Nu•.x.w..r-�w../L:>w^::...3: • • . .., ..W...�!.L.acF...iS. a..:Y«;i...i ..., '�..;J.•j�'.:-•. .. 'M..^ :.:J:.sSa.lrYIJL►:tsli"JQ'Gol°:l�ily�*^.y... (Owl) r U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CHWICAL ANALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATIONS DM 21 #28r 34, 39, 41, 26, 11 So 15, 20, 21 Dm 23 - DM 34 #4, 1 DM 35 #11 2 TOTAL REPRLSENTATM SAMPLE LOCATIONS 17 ' - .. - 1. ,• •'i i 17 K1 r.' ' f�•'�'+r"�`^•'�Mam"'t7iY4'.14IAF3vGi`eMiTri.�-sS:..C�!:lw w't2AK,•i-.^{r+:.:':,7 Ai.+•:t•:,a'r,: :Y, :`!.!i:•rl G':'Gdi.:J:,/s...`wiz+w:fd'/W�/ts�MRwws+w,u4!liGi./i41.NK•M'�'^"`�I.iP"`' . `�- Ir .., . • • 1. 1� '.t rim. .1 .. .. a C...a , ,I y r � _ + d' It f,. i+ urn prr! ;� + f �. '•'��+ Ayr. .t,c r +� +7. f 1 , r r,.. � rJ ,"� * ,� � *, f+�7 �.•� t f { I rt',• � 1 +y, i D� '� ! r; ��..,� 1� �l, � r � y,:' .. ,} c f .+�, e ,I J� •f •.r t-� ;r, •i r �, 1., � e r (yyy��{(, ,' :.+i- .y+ l�'9 0.}t r'L /',� f' r;'r �.�•f� f�i .' k7 �. ;! (• i 1, r r r�.�I i. 1 :?`Y�iy? 'If'.,�t r' 'r��`��:tl r'• �r�}'f.S '�7?...'��s1�rr 1 •�',r;r�y�.� •:��rF,�,".�'}r� .;i'"ri/FZ�'y�;iJ,/�t��,j, n ,r'�/1Cj�rs.f.-A ,,�j}"x ;,��`'' r�rl��•�•��>T��{GF. i1��. ../�;'+'?";r.. d1^,�j 1"rfY ��'i'{�"IXir "/. ^j�;C'�� "� �%�i( �� '�x� t.f� �y��i . .� y%� '!+f�/��, i�+'�,� I ,l� �f � +��n"►rf �'�!'t'/r�' iti�y.{1,)�Gri �� •. �, .�y+a e S � '��r �y.1!��4 Y�: �'{ f{,,�15..:/�(AS .{� p�*�,"f,*3..�� "�f�l �)r� Yy�/{(j;1r'M1y ��rryy �d"�1yr�1•N` J'` (l 3'`] j(' �.��, � �jF1l � .r' �� j (/IP�vJ �/�. �(J.^'J'��t ry 57=� t�( f��•��ft�7/l'gi/.F n1;bJl,k'Yr:Li�r;IJI:✓:��J�.v.�N7'4�/.^'Cr 1 �'rH J{�fl�f+�4,�7;� f��!�.yf JW "Lk�^t��,�hM��t�ii��t��Ir��C 19.'1 f 1 1 •' , ' OMEN 1f 1 iyc •f `,,�"'"�" r�r'- ! 2Cf ^ 0.*�r .'.`ray �e;+. ..'� 1 rp - f r �:{ T1.•� }) ! 'f', t�..� 1-S�� ti- r:v''r+7 ,? . -.�tr � '�!,,,t �t,•'.R i�r.r �1:. r'+.-�� f ',E�r '��'.fx �'r' `�i1` '� '�' j i,"'�J',+�':. fit' do'y�� t• •tar;R�' �.�! ,A .;,; yf '.�r,;-1�I S '�', C .�f c. .,r; , .. �• 3 rr x,��± �r ,f�'�.�,.�� ..f, .�r�' ,,;•; .5 ; �.,,`'�t�r.r+jqt,}*'�, f" 'a�". �' � �,,r�r�.�'' t'�!�`�y�,t ��, � �y}`�:,' + ! ".+, b /'. r lfr•,,,.i ! ptM :l?.., S{x }',i'rc, 4" f' f t+'� L:�'. 'iyyr �' �"+f� rt i!u f.4+,�r. % frY�TJ ,,I, p-fi l��• ?1� !� • �� rZ "� ri t" �a.�� ` f .t'� . ♦O. � ♦per ° ♦ AL IA on mw _ ,a •. Ai►i1NG ' ' SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP Wi; �� CITY OF HJNflNG 1 ON BEACH D?s. 23 • ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PRDPERTY MAP SAMPLE I-0C,47*1DNS yam•. y r�+. ._ .ter .•r•�.rr%� w•1�. je 17 VAL g Owl of 11! ` ,:t ;( �{' �/'. ! {,• %i�ia�?;�=�;•t^�,f � �` :• f .. s ram..• �. t � =r 1 �� f�K '11�7...�r� • � •��.�`� ,..� �� !••�'��tti•''�.��:7f1:..�. �•J t~�'•..•;��.y�yv "�^�.^TI•'.•f� +u4LYtMf 4.LNAV ktn..:1Li.......wt•• •:•. d'1.'a... .n,,.a_:.i.. :.�, ._...�...«. ..�.._.•.[i .'r`^ui.'r .r,.•_ .. •... .tr Si w.{':.F'r,w•1 i,wb.r+Mi�MiL'..�a,L,'::{�Slj` } K 1 ANNING ��rrrrr�.r�. isi.� rr�e� - __ — r__ r.. —___' - — .��r rr+r ■ rrw.r rr�.n.r.�+�r�� SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 29-5-;-II lr.tS 'T OF DM 34 UT`1MGTO1. BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE CF PROPERTY YAP Jr �. WAR tFR AVE i a • I A t Y f ......war.w.aw.'..w•rlr G..Ll' .,µ..+. /ar. r.....rn u..�. .•�•xx'Ki"..l.J.....H. r.. .........,..•r:..�,._......r �.iJ..-. U i ,.Kr...r... _ wraIt; I 1" • 1 1 (1 Lent W �r ��I•I••�I�r./ �A 111►/1�lFM SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 30-5-r11 ��--- --� Uff OF UM 35 RIUNnNGTON BEAD ' ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PrWERT Y MAP 44ltMLiff " f.ac4r/ A16 { tfr. ♦ J Off; . ,�� 4.r•mow_ • ti. .. .»...+w+w,.s••.r w.....��,.,e..e,w•....r,......•:s,.:».+....i...4"11.i ri:�qt`..1,.f h�,('. -.:r»...u.,i.r.»-�.:ii.K.....+:V.i::e.�..7.�`,:,::.t j7,..'i'ti%��'t'�'�Y..C'll'w (1aar.rww WR.iII:"�:ali�. . . - • � 1. APPILOV X CITY COjTrjClL EQUE .r FOR T COUNG.. ACTION city ct.rRx Date October 2j 1984 . Submittad•ta: 'Mayor and City Wuncil Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator s � x Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works y Subject: Personnel Complement Increase Consistent with Council Policy? [xj yes ( ] Now Policy or Exception n; V,& s Statement of Itsue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,A.tachme STATaIT OF I SSEM: {t Resolutions . of 'non-billed as .well as erroneously billed Water accounts for 'refuse 3 collection have proven to fiscally validate the necessity to increase the permwent.work 'force complement. RBOOM OMATIONS: I. Approve an increase in the Maintenance Administration Division of 'Public Works by } adding one permanent entry level maintenance worker to the personnel complement of Account No. 420. 2. .Authorize the necessary funding for the position, which funding has already bcen offset by increased ceceipts deposited into the Refuse Revrr.ae' Account. ANALYSIS: Fol.lowirts Erie commencement of collecting charges. on the water billings and a subsequent count ; of the residential trash collection units, it was recognized that a very significant disparity existed between the refuse court and the water customer, totals;. and .. it was apparent that significant revenues were not being collected. Compounding. these concerns were •a host o€ corQlaints being received by four departments regarding boing billed by the City in error due to having b:n service; and none had personnel available for,.field"'confirmations. , Resolution of both the count disparity and response to citizen ccip afnts followed hiring, a recurrent maintenance Worker, who has performed in an outstanding manner, and continues he daily.search far billing corrections. The need-is continuous due to each new development .completion requiring field review and assuring 'that*trash codas are set:-properly for billing. Findings that are,already recorded verify additions to revenue that exceed the requested ecmuloyee cost by $2,000 per month; and ' four hundred oSier billing addition needs, have been uncovered, but have yet.to commence being.bi.11ed, pending code changes and tReir account billj«g'cycle: Attests La the value , of this performance have been received from four , departments of thb City that are affected and concerned with accuracy of revenue accounting. KWIM SOURM: Unappropriated Fund Balance, offset by Refuse Revenue Account. P10 4/64 1X►r'r..r..wr.ww...•.+rww•yww••w.�...�� . r.+.f wJ.......w r....w,a . w-+—......... . .�� '•"Mt. x Page -2- Request for City Council Action R:rsonnel Complement Increase ALTEMTM ACTION: Do not approve. Verification coamniyue from City Treasurer. LPS:DWK:bn I I I.• rrrwAww+..w.w+'•r.+wr...r...«...,r.+.ow_+...�r>.....ra..,,n-.....w...,.......�.,.�M...+rw.t: y:...,.,.........�.�...w....._......._.._..��.._._.....�.....�,............,......v.r..v..++•o,trnr�a.:J'ay/V,il.�Ti": rt+.; P.O. BOX 711 CALIFORNIA 92o4f3 CITY TREASURi.R--DONALD L WATSON MM M: Lou San&:Yval, Public Works Dimctor mw FRow Donald Watson, City Treasurer DATE: September 14, 1989 SUHJEM MIRCIA DU'MAR Marcia has been personally.responsible fur adding over 500 accounts to our trash ; billi,7. This represents over $3,750."00 per month and $45,000 annually in additional revenue to the City. While this no-a than. pays for her salary it &x= t represent the-total value of her. serva.�oes to the City. We still get.catplaints.about trash balling, -but they are are getting less and less. A big reason is marcia's ability to revolve the problem and save the second-and .third call. She also has saved Finance considerable time in correcting billings. All of this has some dollar value but the greatest value of all is perhaps less 'tangible. It is the percepticrn of the citizens that someone-is responsive.and gets things done. Marcia is an asset to this City and should be added to"the staff. very truly yours, Donald L. Watson City Treasurer cc: Don Kiser 7 h • RDQUEST E'ONPREPARATION OF FISCAL IMPACT e0"'TE46Tr •. • I. WHY IS THIS ITEM NOT IN THE BUDGETS Etiplcyee commenced work in spring, .-�*�d validation of value'to revenue increases had yet to be recorded. II. WHAT WILL BE THE COST? A. Direct Cost t 1 1. Current Fiscal Year Cost: $17,320 2. Future Cost: $201784 B. indirect 1. Cash Floe: 2. Maintenance: ` I i • 3. Overhead: $6,,654 4. Grant Requirew►nts: TII. E•'U[dDMG SOURCE 3 A. Fund: General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance_ B. Revenue Source: Refuse Revenue Account C. Alternative Mliding Sources: IV. HIMMY A. Identify Ending Sources previously used for the project: Contract Service'Refuse s B. Indicate whether the suggested funding source is normally used '.. for this type of project: Normally General Fund/r-exsonnel Services ti.....�w+.•++w..+.ur.r..er.air.•.......wr«.........,ww++.ww.as..:L.A'!r a a-.y.!..+c+nr.w....+'..,......�...��.�ra:+.�aarx:.G.'._M.tatit�N+'.,ra'1+s++...+.o+'�w+..�x,•47G. :r ;.1`: 'S}k�. -•':.i•_ ..-.I:!�'.!t4,w': .44gq^ Csw►b� :rr £. .- t„r.� _ �'f�{ i"� 4� .. Yi• ��,: ,• ..�r�, 1:i; a+ �� y t 41;•.,.•,•J. i 'r 's►>-^J^ +. . , y 'tt -..,r[ r t may'• t': ,*,...., l"..«.,. ,i:3C�t 1 a�C•?'=rs'. •t•:) •s t•... yy.. •�..0 �'r� fi•.J .rti"yf�•' •t i,;,.7: a`� _ t�7/�_.sY!;i . } ;la�.a.�.r.C7•.i^,si.+l,,;,,,'�y t:.r:.. f , 'I „•.�t,:.%j a � l7.. r..: •;,i f3: c..• y .•.»..+•.ram .a.�..� ti^ a rr•;'.T•llSaw1�" a'•i .r;r- .��• ''i)ir G :t._�•. r,.t�,• �Tf..Xf�{1i"'T' �1' _ t`i• „�.tt �ie'r �r..��/•---- ' pa v n: /. •f..t 1-...:!',��ii;�i../�ri il•�r�• +...t . . .R y s Y. a"'��r.',a .....,}'.'w'. ar (r, a F I !' -,:• T y!r , � J,•,• % _c •+ri, ' r(1':a+i, �{•, #r Ti� .;� , 37•H?S;.t:4 -. •�,�: ;�,•;,;,k�, ., ,•,,=!j.*! �+•N f yitp,,r:i'Ie "�,�; .Ta•. ..,... !!' t•i. �t�,r,�.?..•J;r +' �! ,�� !'r �s ` �: .cri f �. ilt�.i:;:;'-, '::•i: "tt%I✓1:1+t +•-�'j Sr•7. i !�. `I:.•,i .tj T• ,r.� J:... s.�'��.I,.. ..'t;.. .e.;�fit., `fL,•a,;,�•r t• r( �•';� ij t:�ti:.,..�'+.,[t�a,• ``ct�'�' •� d"sa} ��j, .�`- �• •.I'-'ti'!i%.�r::'•Ti, r•'ys'�i�j('�:�,:;.I.•`�a'?.•�.: ,,;,;.:„ pit.,t.4i:,�; 'a�: ,•�.•,fr;,�`'•'{:�x�';:n,£�:5�-�;: •+li/ lL• ra{ a 'F, A' .! :!=r.•" f't;"�•" _ rV' 7' " •I '•ir:'_-,`: ls; r' (S•t, )l^ �±.�-i: •� :.., r , ',� H!'�.t. i� � ' '/ i4s,.q r/3."� Y SL/•N f.7):T��.i-w+R'..�i,�/.j,... M' 4�`�;i.ii 17Y !J �,��'.1J[�y.a,�. ' •v A ~ "Cl' UFATIN f`.A�Y }L7..tS�t=.sY% I �l /_I:w.:r•3. ;i. r r[i ► jv ��, f f -Srtw►�1 d y Sw`ltl4.t r l+ �. �r :/or'..:^. �� ''•'',t.•a+1.i Z=f!/.�S "�y' ��F• _.. •�INT[z t+'Gt1K+::,:$t+' :irr.Tii,G,'tff:�nwi `'a�r7F 1. r= •! ,....,:�.t l'a t.. _ :�.(::i: �,:• �,; Y R=DEPARTMENT`, i+IlN1UNICATION ` :�:iI.� c �� }6"YN. : l CO '1[,.^.rs,�•.�'�:s:'J."i!`�rl�1Nf/IiCT('p KAdl','. - .��•:,+.':t+.%.t :[:•'i• .'ty�.".:./.i'w,,,,'._.4�.:fr. h`'•r�,+.} ?f'':1 W''�'�^f•"��"'i Yr:.w Z�� ,.7v . t,i +....J, ._7 ' .•:Z.. .r•! •^ '.C7,•,_: i ....'`.-. ..i,; "+�+..,.r' S :T .4t" ••!,� r''£: v=r'..t'.' 'r •i• %i,.; 'l" .._ .t,. .:,.. «» .rS� t'a,!t.i:`�J: •�lr•% � .• ✓. �,A •a.`', ,' r ., y.�a;t:•'.,5.. :,: r •��: :•r:•!,'` '��y t•,a a..ry -ivn,v:.1.,{. i+ri+'r �i:. .�.jt. _ ��Y.l�. ':f:iJ_: ,7',' �.ti•''.i�;t✓F'r��•.•�jtir:., .r��;:. •� y�. .'d LL ..: •�' "', ,i..y:;'+. ,'i'• : �L�lt�;"';i'v.IJ_ •�rr r.,�,r,.. .�; .11. ,A i.i+l. `�:., L1r�7,1... r�r.r..'_•�.-r .'. C-:. •r�•'•I alb' 'PA UI:. '• _ 7�.=[sr....a).'•�,fi :'»I .a J. 71: ..:' ✓.,� ,: n 'COOK __ILOB•ERT.1 FRANZ _. CIty Adminlstrator _ F...j,:r.-ter.;:;I�,:;;:' y: , Subject " ' Depufy_CIiy,Adminlilrato"r.: ;REQUEST'FOR gPPROPRIATI0IJ Hate . .y- ' 'r :TO�INCREASEtCITY�S PlJ i ,SEPTEMDER=22, 1989 r�'. WORKS P I3_IC t ERSCINAL:SE Y R ICES _.;-:• . z �, ,. L..,�•• T :BUDGET'FOR FISCAI; ;� ` •yr'- '" r� -YE%1R�1989%90r FIS 89-24 • . .. • .• • .. • • ,• t err A •� •. As;'requcsteii under`the auttiorlty of:Retolution ,4032, a Fiscal Impact'.Statcment'has becri prepared.and. sulimltted relative tn;.the•prupased.Increase:of"-one;permarentl entry :level maintenance worker slot 'In: the Maintenance`• Adminlstration `Dl4Ision of Public. Works. A611cipations are that an appropriation•of•$239970 would be sufficient to fully-fund-this transaction through the remainder 6t the current Fiscal Year. afflrmative./ `«t iGo�mcll ` , rx. r. .A se J arfx.'.tialance _ City;; twob1&-,reduce;.•the unaudltcdt .af the.City s,unapp•ropriated.General Find try $2,093;000 '! trait srgnated De Cl City A minlstratvr. f ;-PJF:sd .)t•,•� .tt1i t •flcr7..,S»L T .. � ��. - r. '.•,j• if ,��/a:r�:•;: :4�..y+i-. t t� •.1.(��,��:1:�" �'ti3' ��;6.fir :t,�t � 'e+: :!•`l.'.tii T•�::7i- •y •~�.r ... 1- �•w .a.�•.�;: 1 rf f " i ;4r;�S::.:_��-�, ... :.• . •r :,-' ��•'"• .X:ft,.. itr��5,,tpr�r� 1,._. �'• • a •.� r. 311 p'.�.r(,,t Sly�'7,� ,;. , .'. r l ?- ?� .,-i.>: "" A..- it w,,+i .tt .t Q �'��•�,;rr((.' lJ•� yy ry t)t�f"T�+.T'•�a•.♦rri•• �, T- r.,�'•ra •� t�r r ,�. t. , ..7 .n.: ,:,,` )::.M,�. �^...�,�•`.. � ,+Y'. , +jy j•�/I n'�fI:TJ`1 J.t�A�.�•'.y� `i••S`.rM1 17"IN..II'.4..•�.i'L•'��.�'j�4 J��1t I• 17� _ •'r •�• '�'wC'r:..4 i-t 4 l i� �;* �_-.^Sl �,�a -R��' �w 'Y:`r:J t »1 •f • ., 'f fi''f_�'. ,�• "�''.•'�o. .tt��l:"."S'Sl %r r. 'c. �••{ ��"t"t-;'3 '�'•/aar• �t.z.�.� yj•''4�6�r�!'7�.�.syn�..:w-:w�i .r•�'j1;;;�'S.7''SJ_.•'.�'/.•ryt�• ti}•••yttt�t R�.�i1.1 �.:� r K Y I:;f-rl• r...• �[ d'�•4 •�' � SMfy S!•,v.:.y';'C w.� •]7 .� r j t ti. L,'� �•..y�'r �.i. � SCY:�,� �' .Ct lS^R!'�G:1�•r„ ' f�� ' '�� , •4t _ r `rJ ry �MT:;r� •2`al f i7y'I' ,c 7.�• I•..{:rn• 1� •. 1':.a .( --ryry t�t" a• {..�� '•�.:r .t, A�,,� [ t. ..": l,r, Y .� L,'t j r. a vk' r ar r,..p�;i`.. �a. tv 1 •! !. tom, r,:F L �'±�} V�t r• y F,-.!� jj}}�� \";?�l++�w'r-+r�l%�`�",'��s:w#,•1�+=��''.:a•j ,�•. r`.'1,�...r :.s,i;e�• '�'t,,,T'•i:^hJf�,., y��%�`�.t��l I"Pr.�..J�� ' `"'1`�i �•1�, Y::.S' •�i, i ;.. ....rvri�:,7'"" -�,i,. I ..:• •A� M+'`j„•�r�rilt��y�,Y��• �t » ,.�r�,.a./ ,-x L' �. •r'r •�1 arj�: f:+='� ;:1i�j;;t��:I��:'ItN,..�f,r„•r,F�+�,/•`+t}�Y IF�,?.•`,.413.1!,Ti•as�fiS� v ..----.......r.........r.rw+,fr,.w.......�......�._.__....._._.._�....................�.,. . ,. CCU: .........,....._ .�... � -.�, = .^�'4�n }r ; , � QQ REQUE6T FOR CITY COUNG AST N -, ,� I Uj DOW August 7. l QR� ° Sisbmjttadto: Honorable Mayor and City Council. .. c' • -f l�, M01MD BY Ciejp1VGiL ; Submitwd j y: Paul E. Cook, City Adrr.3nlstrator � ; ;, L p by: Louis F. Sandoval, Dir*ctor of Public Works C11:2 REPLACEMENT OF SEWER MAIN ON EDWARDS S I RE �"-Q%""`"' &Z� ,�._ 9.0 CorWitent with Cohn'dl Policy? [9 'vas [ a New Policy•er Eree i6on Statement of Issue,Recomnlai tjon,A.najysjs,Funding Saurrae;A(terr�.3tive Actions,Atta:.hmarttls: r - ----- STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Council action is,required in order to modify the 19.9•-:-0 budget documcrtt'to include the replacement of x defective sewer pipe. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize an appropriation of $60,000 from'the sewer fund reserve to repair a defective sewer line.. : ANALYSIS: Recent tests have indicated that 2,100 feet of Techite sewer line on Edwards Street near BaimOral,Drive'Is in the process of decomposing. There have been six 'fallures In the llne•in the last few months, and it should be rrplaced by an eight inch C-900 heary d.tty plastic pipe. ,'Techite pipe was a low cost,exporimental pipe used in the early 1970ts which 'tYs proven unable ,•� to stand up to sewer gas. The gas gradually destroys the-resin Inside the plpe,walls causing them-to splinter and leak. The cast of replacement will not exceed $60,000. FUNDING SOURCE: Setter funds.,on deposit in account G-SL-00-000-3-01-01 to be tranferred into account E-S L-P W-S 00-6-76-00. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Continue to repair the line plecemeal. ATTACHMENTS: Fa.a. • Map LFS:JS:Iw 2139f../S Etta e/M; - ++w�Y�l:wrt�k'7i:JrceYt'it:•,ui.M:�TbLll...:.ala'"r...l.:.la:y.�:i-:n i.«rr.;y.',',,,,:... :.y.k.,+.c.*.+:a.a++•�+�+.•..r..+r«r....wa..s�rwwraww Ions �{1G� b! , t CITY AF Hi NTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MNrMWW mac" To PAUL E. COOK From ROBERTS. FRANZ City Administrator, Deputy City Administrator Subject .REQUEST FOR.FUNDING to Date: JULY 260 1999 ACCOMMODATE REPLACEMENT OF SEWER MAIN ON EDWARDS ST. FIS 89-20 '.As requested'under 'the authority of'Resolutton 4832, a. Fiscal Irnpaet"Statement'has been pr6� red'aMd iubmItted relative to thi'proposed replacement of 'a defective sewer.'pipe on Edwards Street near Balmoral Drive that Is in,the process'of decomposition, AntIcipations by:thb requesting entity are that an appropriation of $60,000 would be adequate to repair the detective line. y An affirmative response by the City Council would reduce the balance of the CityyIs -unaudited,'unencambered, undesignated, unreserved Sewer Fund to $3,679,001.99. Deputy City did Inlsti ator RJ'F:bd 4710J ■ : 11I1wIsm -. ~ ��wi�4wti�� IIIIIIII[M ►loll _Ill si�•'r ��R■IIIIII[ 17 '� wr�Mf lA■0 mld�w�iww wr�Ilr: w �pp�Oe .rim rri�rwr unrt�a .r w�i�dm >. wp.�.arr' IIMAIIII INIIIlllr4��flllltlllllfllM//■ ww�rrwew arr rw�arr�mw /� rremm ,weerCF-E 11w wwwm+ru�rrmw w lllfllll ww pfff111 0111111 >aw _mw r:aww aw;ar w mrr or . ��ar . �R♦� V�i'3ga wa 1flr ■r. wa as •• fllllrl ♦ ¢ ''$' ■ 1!� dl"MR f,4m fn! /f11�1fill C i11[11=II1I111I11■ Hiller as"'M Qa low awwa uL ~ 11[ MIp m10°� mm ff1 mm. M qff�IIfII 1e.■ �f11 11[11IIIL1■ , =S '�� C� �� a!•0 G i�. f w'r fIf1111© Il'�'II w Ifflfr`� E�/ ="- d rwi1 �rar4� ��a .ee 11IIIA/ ¢�lo fl af©of MO = aw w p .�.T �r a rr♦• /r�e a ■ rr q �rr law Qm a weem m►�a © � �r�©mew •� � MIIfI1� � tlw w!1 rAr w mum rr w d��Iad .� rw wwrr raa ■r wee a aC mrM:r �.flfllp'� � q• low eewa r,._ ��Ci.r w�f�/ff/l�lr�/► �a m w *'�■ �/ b�0 ra �w �� ®r6m =ON te �m a Lea ww rs;w.nor w rw r��Of/gym M r Q©id lr, Iw r w I[IO/A m`` d �r�110:wwa nrr wm w,ii asa4 +Ct4°r cr rrw��rfiwra mw m OIL" rr wr ,rr:1m� islr�d� rw-� ■[I[/�f "'��Aw swie .mar ■r7m m w�rr`w�iil:urw�lmm ,awM qp- IffA11III�MIf' 1llvwair�aAA1f9''�w rrM~ra-mr '�■re� 4 �[IIU wta fN■ 111 as mIII11111I III F,�IIIIIINA11111f■��I 1�1 1I1■ NIIIds� �I«�II1RIJrAM�l111!!tl :v�1 /IIIII [IIIIf1►ti • r 1 u I�'1�I ulll■ .��rr ��'1o1�NlIlI1Nl f1IlII.1N1� Il��;# ��iHl�� fill IIII[I��1M'1 ��1► A f1� wra w�f►�/Afr rrg m�fl�M �a -�4 w ��' w�IIII[ rmrw"s �'1111 1111►� Ira w rCr 4 f111 ,. mm rr w �I • "��" mO q�� CC I In �A'iii�rQ� nf[n ip I l�i l r �e�� or� rarf111 w ' 'r n11.11 r.w 1��[� 1I fflfl 1[If�p A a : +�rw ■l1/ rdrr 111 III wrriw �I� =M % RfM �! ■rfMI►��1lr/ rr r l rw mwwe mw �rw wwr mm mm S/11IIIII�IN/11 lllir�[I111 /i[l![ mr w""n q~r MIIIt,�m � w %4 D►��►,w .ee'r r}rw.� Q�'Aaw� �e r. w fil1IIAi 'rw MO= Will1If111AAM1IflI •e.i ww ��w'mw w MfIlffNll<U�rr". wrmie [III�N IIIIIIIMI111I1 "' � 1e iw � � } IIIIfII[11111 0m 11I1 1 i11111II1[M[ a �M4M=F�M��,r� li�I�N� �1IIIr.��iI11111 Il11lI1AAMI I r Gv M W A�III[f / '[Ifllla®/'��I11 a1IIlIfI1I1111 M��r ��M�► W �; uf°e m1111I1IIII mi%IIIII�Yw•wirw•awr a i�rr.� e1I11I111I1,n�►�rlf■l�r rr;'w•�Ma• ► '�'��/1?•l�M. 'd rrlm d�:mM mr■�.r��;�wfl��►��r�, 1�, II/l /III s��'�`��:'`"��-.mii �/�1r''CU /r�►1►��►\� ►�lif NIlIf1A♦�1 i � REQUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL... T ION �A, /-1��/r•:: -f�:; f.-. _. Date August 71 1989 Submitted to: Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator .. Prepared by Louis F. Sandoval. Director of public Wo"rr,. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Subject: Vehicle Replacement Cor intent with Council Policy? Yes I l New Policy or Exce ption'r -.:�' Statement of Issue,Rec.-ommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,AltornAw-UP1 The 'Pickup truck Unit 677-192 sustained damages in a collision accident on July 18, 1989 Which exceeds the book value of the vehicle, and it is vital to have it: replaced. R300[�ll HOATTUN:' (- Aathorize. expenditure "of $18,550, for 'the replacement of this vehidle, a 3/4 trni pickup with a service body, equipped with a hoist and radio. ANALitSIS: The service truc'C Unit. 677-192, assigned. to the Seater Maintenance Division, was rear ended in a traffic accident on July IS., 1989,, and damagea,to the vehicle exceed its:book value of 'about. $3,300 `which would be the .maxi WA? ."recoverable from an,insurance company. This vehirlp i vital to the Sewer Divisions operations us'it is a service truck utilized in the maintenance of thirty-one sewer lift stations throughout the city. The cost for a. replacement is estimated at $17,500 plus tax for a total. of $18,550. FUNDING 90itRCE: Unappropriated Em,xipment 3eplacement Rmd Balance. AL I+T1 M ACTMJ. None, as there are no existing substitution vehicles available. Ate: Memorandum from Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor. ID /S P10 4/94 �o ..ar.�.r.. ...r..�w.+.rt+..- ._..-...... . _ ...w..,e.y W lhl♦iX,,,Jj•M..♦ ll..........,r.rl..�M.wv�. r.w ..w.r.w.iw.✓✓L/+i..4..1. '4.Mn+nw+►wr-�._ �yy4Zy/ r I , j �J• A' CITY CW HUN TINlr"TON! OVAL H INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION tNllliwCTM R," TO PAUL L COOK From RODERT J. FRANZ City Administrator Deputy City Administrator Sublect ItEQUEST'FaR APPR"OPRIATION Date JULY 269 1989 TO REPLACE DAMAGED TRUCK ASSIGNED TO SEWER DIIISION FIS 89-18 As,requested under,'thu'authority of,Resolution 4832, a Fiscal.Impact statement has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed replacement cf a damaged pickup.,feud:. essentially tatalle&.out due to a 'rear.ended accident on July,-,18, .1989. This;•0articular' t•ehicle has been utilized In`the maintenance of thirty-one sewer lift Ftatlons`throughout;the City;, and'%thus, is vital to the. effeetive: continuation of operations of that Divislan's responsibilities. ,71te requesting entity has suggested that an appropriation of $18#550 would be adequate for'this purpose. . An affirmaiivs response by, the City.:Council vcouId r duce the balance of the . City's unaudited, unencumbered, undeeignated, unreserved Egiw(pmient Replacement Fund to $326;196.98. DAN T. VILLELLA Director of Finance For: -HER— 7.__P�T RANZ Deputy City Administrator RJF:sd 4?1oj i He CITY OF HuNT1ua� BE ACH N INTER-DEPAF`rMENT COMMUNICATION . wurn orr 1WH To DONALD W. RISER From DEL GRAY ' DIVISION ENGINEER MECH. MAINT. SUP. Subject COLLISION DAMAGE Date JULY 20,, 1989 UNIT 677-192 Pickup, truck number, 677-192 has been involved in . a traffic :collision resulting.;in damages to_, the, truck that exceed 'its value. The second party to the collision was at fault and the 'Citywill recover some money from that second party but probably only to the extent. of the book value of the City's truck,, approximately $3300. In cases such as this,, the insurance company covering the second party . pays the City the book value of the City truck. and takes possession of the salvager, for partial cost recovery of their clients claim. This means that the .operating.,division .'of.. the - City Which was using this truck has to have a replacement as it is not owned by. the insurance . company. Replacement vehicles of this type,, 3/4 . ton pickup with service body,, cost approximately $174500 at this time. .Please pursue an allocation of funds for this purpose as soon as possible. DG:ap i I I ' I 1 jA Fiscal Impact Statement REPLACEMENT SEWER SERVICE TRUCK ;[ 1. BudgetStatus s------------- T r This item i not budgeted. It was destroyed as the result ' of an unforseeable accident. 2. 'i'utal Costs .I >; -- ------------ a. Direct: A. $ 413.,550 one time. expenditure from the dquip- ment replacement fund balance. b. Indirect: '-The loss ."of interest earnings on these funds.' �. . 3. Funding Source -------------- a. Funds: Unappropriated equipment: replacement funds now can deposit in account G-IO--00-000-3-01-01. b. Revenue Source: 'General ' taxation. c. Alternative Funding Source: General Funds. . ; d. History: Equipment replacement funds. have been used for this. purapse to the past. L t i . ( r ; { �`�'�'•!��iyrasr.•w+..w..�.w.•.wrr..•�+......_.�..---.,.,....._...,�.,.,.e,wa.:::yr.......J-e....xv.w.-i•+,.....-....+..unr,•rnl:r•.Y.sk:...Y:7,:L.fib'►.1�Y,.V,'.rLl.•isoWw.r,n.++r w+iww• REQUMf FOR CITY COUNCIL-AG laid DanMay 1, 1989 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City AdmlMstrato� gOVED BY CITY COUNCIL Prepared Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works 29 `ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR SB-821 (GAS TAX)FU JS Subject: CLEIR Consistent with Council Policy? I Yes [ J Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attadiments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Each year % of the gas tax.funds of the County are set aside by Senate Bill821 for pedestrian and bicycle improvements, The funds are distributed by population. This year the City of Huntington Beach will receive approximately $55,764.00. IRECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution .and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute. ANALYSIS.- The city has, for many years, used Senate Bill 821 funds to provide sidewalks, access ramps, bikeways and audible signals., This year the ahnve amount will be applied towards improving various street corners providing concrete sidewalks and handicap access ramps$ The specific locations will be presented to the City Council for approval prior to award of the construction contract. FUNDING SOURCE: Senate Bill 821 funds ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not take action and du not apply for fiscal 1988-89 funds. ATTACHMENT: Resolution LFS:RAM:dw 1778g/3 'D P!0 6/85 p .,,...........�.-.-...-�........•-......«..-�.»....�....+......rr or.:. tL:. «1..:.,.....1'.rr.n�;�ti�raw..cif+-�►a:r:�.v+:-:tl:»-{e:i:v:t!�iwati`41M.4 w+:n�tJl7ktYMVfiCaGLf7�' . REQUE&.I FOR CITY COUNCIL- ACTT I0N X ?3,1P,J DaU! $SRfi.��TEE,fL 19�� Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council gppRpyED BY CITY COUNCi. Submitted by: Paul E. Cook; City Administratnc FrWared by: Lour F. Sandovel, Director of Public Works , Subject: ANNUAL APPLICATION FOR SB-821 (GAS TAX)FL Consiriant with Council policy? N) Yes. 13 New Policy or Exception Statcment of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,AttaAments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Each year 2% of the gas tax funds of the County are set aside by Senate Bill 821 for pedestrian and bicycle Improvements. The funds are distributed by population. This year. the City of Huntington Beach will receive approximately $91,693.00. RECONIMENDATION: Approve Resolution.3gJ1 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute. ANALYSIS: The'city has,.for many years, used Senate Bill 821 funds to provide sidewalks, access ramps biketyays and audible bignals. This year the above amount will tie applied towards improving'the bluff top along•the ocean north of.Golden West Street as a strip park with bike and'pedestrisn trails. The improvements will be'similer to the improved nation of the,bluff,between Golden West Street and Ninth Street that has been recently been completed. ' FUNDING SOURCE: Senate Bill 821 funds _ALTFQNATIVE'ACTION: j Do not take action and do not apply for fiscal 1988-89 funds. PECoLFS:RAM:dw 1778g/3 *� Flo 5/1* ...`_..-.._. .-............^.......,.__..-..,..�...�.»w...0.+,.,<:«a.s.s.,...w,.«,.,....�........w..*un r•.u:.z:r iaif a o-.::ifi.t;tFliFat•+.r"�'^,'r""�'^'way�!44� a REQUES #' FOR CITY COUNCLI-ACTION A�w Date Qrtaher,6, `..>A? Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council S:ibmittad by: Paul E. Cook, Interim City Administrator pILpyED AY CLTY GDpNGIL 19YD Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Interim City Administrator �1 Subject: FEDERAL AID URBAN FUND'BROKERING cLeus: Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes 1<j Now Policy or E=Wtion Statue nt of issue,Recomnmidation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actlorw,Attachments: STATEMENT OF MATTER: The Cit has an .o ` ortunit to exchange Federal Aid Urban FAU funds for City of Irvine' Y PP Y 9 ( ) Y gasoline tax funds. , _ RECIJMMENDATION: Authorize the Director of,Public Worksto.negotiate an,agreement between the Orange County Transportation'Conimission, the City of Irvine and the.City of Huntington Beach to exchange City of Huntington Beach FAU funds for City of Irvine gasoline tax funds. ANALYSIS: In 198�i the,City;of Huntington Beach applied for and was awarded FAU funds,�for the wid6ning'of Goldenwest Street between Rio.,Vlsta'Avenus end Pacific.Coast'Highway. Federal Aid Urban Funds are administered through'CALTRAN5'end the Federal Highway �Adminlstratlon:..Because of the rigorous'Nationel Environrental Protection Act.(NEPA) ' requirements`EIR"documents'.fcr FAU projects'must be very,detet!ed an'd"are subject 6 review,at bnth'stote•and federal levels prlor to.being released for general comment. The review.perlvd may.take several years;particularly if there are'dnk actual.or potential archeological:or historical sites,.wetland or �,ildlife areas, adjacent structures, . underground utilities; rights-of-way to be acquired, or the possibility of any hazardous - materials In the project area. • A CITY Experience with FAU Protects: .NEPA (National Environmental Protection Agency) procedures are very,rIgorous and 'because they are administered by bureaucrats.from outslde the local area..sihiple Issues 'become*Insurmountable problems.. As an example the,City just recently completed a Draft EIR for the Warner Avenue Widening FAU project. The,cost of the original, contract fnr•the EIR was $30,889 and the consultant began work an'the document In April, 1983. On.August 14, 1987 the 4th Draft EIR was submitted to CALTRANS and the FHWA for processing with no assurance that it would be accepted. The cost of the document has risen to $85,328.- During this 4 113 year environmental processing"period the cost.of the Warner widening project has increased from an estimated $3.65 million to 4.29 million due to increased construction costs (inflation). Although the City's share of the project is only 12.6% and has risen only $55 000 in the year a !od, the total bill to the taxpayer has still risen by $440,000. No 5/s5 r�Y�.l�+M111•i'.�(ri�+�s�i.�i�.�4��R5►VIIY LMIV.',rJr.lw.-+MI-[41rwu.wrr rwY.M►.'i MiJwiW..Ji:.". F1...R.s..'h1✓�r�/'r.r++ry rwrrant�.,s:�i.,,r,•,r..:. •.:.:,`rir.:�'..,f.�.":+WA.wc.iiv"i.Y:{;°iG;j;Ji«�! , "N Federal Aid Urban Fund BraKering -RCA October a, 1987 Page 2 The Golde4W' t•EIR process is starting to;look the same. On May 22, 1986 the EIR process began with a $32,00.0 contract. After,an'initial submittal of a draft to CALTRANS In"June,'1987 it became'6vious`that we had barely tapped the surface. ,,The Connell approved an amended contract ($166000)In August to do an archeological dig and a $40,000 contract amendment ls.pending for preUminary engineering to enable the EIR consultent.to determine the project effect on "every.blade.of,gra3511 .It appears that we may also berone of the firat agencies.to fall under the new federal hazardous sit e'policy since the road widening Is adjacentto'oil fields: No one can tell us what obstacles this, nsw policy may create. The Stste're_vIew personnel are estimating another 1 1/2 years to complete.the EIR process and an additional 1 1/2 years to acquire rlghts=of way. Pro and Cons of brokering FAU dollars The benefit to the City of Huntingtnn Beach in mvappirig FAU dollars fdr':gasoline tax dollars ie"the'reduction in State and Federal processing time: The benefit to tlie:City;of ;; lrvine:ls•1n obtainld9' FAU'dollars at a-discounted rate.' I6,this case lrvine=ls offeririg;us f' 80 ,i ' gai'i"i dollars'for'each dollar of our FAU money' Irvine'.has alread -comp laced the tf.. 9 Y Y- _ P. .. „, environmental processing on their project and Is ready to"proceed'wlth constriction. ,^ PCs •, _,.• .• ..�, . . ..:' . ..: ..... 1- • ';•.: '�� The GdId6nwest Street widening"project. 8 estimated at about#4.29 million ,including , dent The FAU share is about gri;-right-of�wayi construction and constructlon engineering. ti $3.7 ml!lion'and Irvine would offer us about $3 m1111, font. ; Possible savings ur benefits resulting"from brokering FAU dollars. . 1. We could bid the'pro act 2 ears earlier: �If iV used as tax fund the CEQA recess P j Y g � P c;. r could be substituted for the NEPA process and CALTRANS and the FHWA would not 1 7 ' hays ta'review EIR, R/W a 'qulsition or plans. r 2.'. We could invest the money received from Irvine at a rate exceeding the inftation'rate by Costs of constrruction have beeri.lncrsasing about 2 3 %,,a.year,for the`post # three years, A one year,CD is over 7%. In'two years we could earn up to$250;000. 'JVe Could negotiete,R/Wpurch'ase and meybe:get some dedications rather than follow cum6ereame federal regulations and buy It only at.appralsed"Oil ces.;:Of;;the900,000 in estimated'rig'ht=of-way•value we should be able to save at least$100,000 and posRi6ly'as muct- as$500,000. rs 4. Historically.the costs of administering an FAU project have been about 7% of the 3 total construction costs. For a $4.29 million project this amounts to aver We'iliould be able to cut this ftgure In half by eliminating the Federal review r processes. Considering these savings of $500,000 to $900,000 the 00% cash of for by Irvine looks very attractive. ++�.r�.!+w..w++ar+rs,wt+urna..:+a•rw aw.w—!� _ «au..•r.s.+e.rnara.a/ww'...r:.1::,a,..�««+w+.,--'r—'•--+�......w.n....+.+.w...r..�,..� .��„�. F edera Aid wUrban Fund Brokering - RCA .` October,1, 1987 Page 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: s, Continue' with the federal Aid Urban project. y ATTACHMENTS: OCTC letter describing FAU fund brokering police, a PEVa.E:dw" 14,15g1 A S is 'i .t VmhM�M�YdI1NA {'+MI�TI'rF1t�IMML�vy+vMl�M WSW F'1.1.A,1'.+•StL. - /,.Sw:JSi 11JIf r.aMwr..•• LY'iV'.J,M IY'M+w.V�.MMf'W.lMR�'�M+�+�•rw�M4Na GRAMME COUNTY t - 77?AN5I'VRrA7I0N COMMISSION I July 30, 1987 ,i. - 1 TO: Members of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) SUBJECT: Approval of a Proposal to Broker Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Funds in Orange County On July'2T, _1987, the Orange. County Transportation ,Commission approved the FAU Brokering Proposal';discussed•at the: July- TAC 'meeting. A copy.of�.tle ; staff report and the approved action p ma'plan are enclosed for your infortion. en . proposaPieas nt a "yowdecide'to•6kercise th,is;Option',-please contact us 5o:we are able to be%3in work on the Cooperative Agreement. If., you have any questions on the proposal please call me. ' i` Sincerely • isa-.Mills; Manager lanning and Programming Lhiite -Enclosure Y f 11 .I 105E Noah Main`Suite 51Q,Sant:Ano Catilomia 92701 (714)834.7581 Te)ecopier1714)834.078 r...w,.r..w.w.�w.aa..w�.....+�wani.try.:-.w+.+.......—..w�.a.,a.-.v«..).:l..a v.:k.....�, . ..,.s.. ..a...w—'--++...+w.�la�Mt'a+v.Cs:'•.tar+.J4.4'v'►'S�,�YA w....w.r+w��t,lt;cwn„� J .. r Item iB. .__._. ORANGE.COUNTY . TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 15, 1987 TO: Members of the Commission � FROM: Staff SUBJECT: Approval of a.Proposal`to Broker Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Funds in Orange County At the`ceguest.of the City of Trvtn`ej Commissionstaft was asked'to review a.proposal;for brokering Orange;County FAU funds.•:.Under.,this proposal, loral.agencles would be able•to «. sell their FAU dollarsat' 'discounted:rate;to' other ag� encies. The overall benefit of:this proposal Is a•reduction;in staate.and federal processing,time.and adminlstrative•costs.to the selling,:_agency 'On July 101• 19870 the Technical•Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the proposal and recommended it be presented to the Commission for your review and approval. Attachment A summarizes the proposal and action plan. BACKGROUND The.Clty of.Irvine'has two FAU-eligible projects totalling tha 25 million t wIibe ready for construatlon;by' Januacy;1988., Thu„itvlo projecm are the .Irvine; Center..Drive wIdsning between Lake Forest and 1'405i($S' million) and the'�Tamboree Road extension tram:DarrEinca Road.to Irvine'Center 'nrive"($20 :million) j..I1.n the current ',l?AU''Progcam; #2,655,000 is programmed: or..the•.Irvine Center,Crive;project.;_;The balance`ot.the'Costs tar this praje`ot. .and for, the Jamboree.Road extenslonx will be paid for•with.Iocal tunds•(developer'feed, ..The City of Irvine.is 's'eeking.to Increase'the.purchasing power of their loeal'dollars by b6talning "brokered",FAU.funds at•a discounted rate.from other agencies in'California:, On June 10, 1987, the Cliy of Irvine sent'an offer letter'to over a dozen agencies In the'state. T a'o Irv' e h d' s he�Cit` f 1n s��rc` osed fo�exten thi offer:to`local agencies inOcerr 'e Count ::The Y 0 p cities and the,`county would be able to."sell" the.FAV funds currently programmed :ar;thelr ro ,cts`t Irvin in esc a cash* _ 6 on d 1 a e'p je o vine' h nge for a as payment of 0 cents the o 1 c. Alt cnatively, deferred payments could be made at a higher rate of exchange depending upon the actual date of payment. The Orange'County Transportation 'Commission staff end the'Technical Advisory Committee believe Irvine's-proposal has merit'and,provides benefits for all parties Involved. However, staff was concerned that'the selling agency.use the funds received from Irvine to construct the roadway projects which are currently in the PAU Program. Several conditions have been added to Irvine's proposal to address this concern. i 1055 North Main. Su0 516. Santa Ana, California 92701 (714)894.7581 IA- TOs Members of the Commission Page 2 FROM: Staff SUBJECT: -Approval of a Proposal to Broker Federal Aid Urban ` (PAU) Funds in Orange County At the July.:1987 TAC meeting, the TAC requested that Irvine's `proposal ba modified 'to elloivr any agency in Orange County to buy or scit FAU funds. The action plan in Attachment A reftects'thts change. , RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Federal Aid'Urban Brokering Proposal as outlined in the staff report° 1 �,,,,�'.'^'. - •- ....-...--.^k....�..w,..s>.M rs aw........-............w,'�.'C.al,'i:...;:s.r•.-.,....,.....�-....�....•+.u..-a+.c..i:'.i.,q,c-...,..:.r::n YiIhMlrww+.......,.,.-'.r...�w.....a.+ • •' �"�, ATTACNMF,NT A • FAU BROKERING PROPOSAL PROPOSAL To allow local agencies to sell their PAU dollars at a discounted rate to other agent BENEFITS OF THE PPOPOSAL The buying agency will benefit by increasing the purchasing power of local funds. OCTC and Caltrans will benefit by the.reduced administrative costs resulting from fewer projects In Orange County's PAU Program. Agencies selling their PAU funds will benefit by: o Eliminating federal environmental and right-of-way review for their projects. o Being able to build.projects to local standards, thus ellminnting Caltranis design and administrative reviews. o ' Implementing'projects sooner since "they will-have the cash In hand and not Have to wait for FAU reimbursement. o Reducing their overall project administration costs. PP.OPOSFD ACTIOtIAAN 1. Request. approval . of this proposal from . QCTC's Technical AdvIsory . Committee. ' 2. Upon approval by the TAC, request OCTC approval. 7. 3. rUpon OCTC approval, 0CTC. will send a letter to `eneh agency In`Orange County with' FAU funds currently programmed outlining the bi�'okering ,..' process. 4: Poe: age nales Interested °in the proposal, execute, a multl=party agreement between OCTC,' ,the buying agency, and the selling agency which certifies': that: a. The i buying agency,will make a sash payment to :,ye selling egeney w ithin - 30 -`days-'-,"of executing the agreement (unless a deferred payment Is :I .. negotlated). b." The selling Agcncy will use the funds received from the.buying'agency end construct the •. U project h I'A ro et from which funds are transfer ed. . . P j ns r . c. The scilin;. agency must award 'the "former". .FAU `project contract no later than the fiscal yearin,which It Is currently ro rammed. An agency . . .. Y P g g Y may file a'n.appeal with'the TAC and OCTC. OCTC will have final approval on all programming inodifieations. d. he selling "will continue to' arti i ate in OCTC's FAU Pro cict T n � j . p , Monitoring Program. if these conditions are not adhered to, the selling . agency will lose its eligibility for future funding allocations from OCTC. 4 ._�.....•-...+........-.....-.-............,....--.+...,._r...a.w+xn.r.'a...............�..........�sw,.r;.....ta..•. .......y......�.......•.... .»..« r..ni.a.r..r.rv+.a•raG:1:�i:+....A.wr.w.+.w..�....w.....rr.....•....w� f 5. Upon execution of the' multi-agency .agreement, OCTC will process the necessary Transportation improvement Program amendments to transfer the FAU funds to the buying agency's projects. 5. Revise OCTC PAU policies,.to Incorporate Items 4 and 5 above and to also add a policy-stating that PAU projects may not,be advanced in the program to accommodate fund brokering. j r i -2- • )W.U.4+a•�s+++"...ww..+-.�--- .ivaatGn.awua.t.'l..nn e++«.�+fr.J(.;+,'."L«�•,.- .n7•..:'!`LS..C:.w�r::.[..c:.:i.k;aS Ye./: .... .... ....r.-y'.•.�5�*I:.}:='��`�..qw'w+r�•r�r y , F`�% CI TV aF HUNTINGTON ®EACH INTE11-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Paul Cook From Les Evans, . Director of Public Works City Engineer Subject FAU FUND BROKERING Date August 28, 1987 Lisa Mills of OCTC met with Jack Miller and me to diacuss ' the .City!s interest in trading our Goldenweat FAU dollars to the City of Irvine for gas tax dollars. The terms- of the deal would be something like this: - 1. We would get gas tax. dollars. based 'on the 1987 ,'estimated Id nwest project Federal share only) . cost of the Go e P ] . 2. We would ,have to reimburse the FRWA for money already spent (about. $32,000 for the EIR) . 3. We. have;-to proceed with the Goldenwe6t project 'and build it within the next 2 or 3 "years. �4. We',could negokiate `dollars;with Irvine, but•what','they are offering -and 'OCTC is supporting is 80 on the dollar: ; The pluses to the City are: 1. Sfaii Higgens feels 'that we; have 1.:1/2 years,:to `go:'to 'get' environmental clearance. : 'If we. did, .the projeot,.with `gas tax funds we could probably clear CEQA by the end _'of the year. 2,, Stan, Higgens feels that we will:`spend 1 1/2, years acquiring , . right-of-way for ,the'-"project.under federal guideli.nes,,,;,-We' could not start'n`,egotiations 'until all environmental :work IS complete.,. With gas :tax• funds: we;could begin right- way way 'negotiations "now and have the necessary. land .within a year. 3. -Under FAU rules we."can't start design ,.until a1.1 EIR approvals ,r . are granted. Using gas tax we cauld start now. The bottom line 'is we could probably ',have, this project under aonstruction.in . 1989 using gas, tax 'funds3. Using FAU funds we would be lucky to"go to construction by 1991. Jack. Miller"is preparing cost estimates for: right-of-way:_ac-- quisition and construction. I will put together .a justification -for brokering the funds. You said you would try to get more than 800 ' from Irvine. We need to get Council .approval, to start the process. Our tar- get date is the meeting of September 21, 1987. LE:dw I i' • C— /1 . S.. . . 93 Via'' T�Ti aa to Honorable Mayor, members of the Huntington Beach City Council and the people in attendance, thank you for the opportunity to address the Council. SUBJECT: Removal of trees on Wicklow Lane. It is appropriate to recognize the Huntington Beach employees who have provided courteous and helpful information on the above subject. A "thank ,you" is extended to those people. , :Y Also, it is appropriate to commend the contractors for, completing the task on Wicklow Lane for tree removal, stump grinding, curb and gutter replacement, sometimes under unpleasant circumstances. Their 'efforts are truly appreciated 1,.�. Now on '`o the subject - as ,spokesperson for the majority:of property owners. on Wicklow Lane, some of Which are represented here this evening, the primary'question Is: Why.has the City of 'Huntington Beach or the City Caunc.il �or a member thereof, opposed the majority of property owners and allowed two (2) trees' to .•5. t remain? .;'. One (1) -at 15851 Wicklow Lane t One (1) at 15971 Wicklow Lane Two local newspapers, The Daily Pilot and the U.S. Postal delivered Register, carried articles about saving the trees on Wicklow Lane. It is obvious that the Huntington Beach city Council can not be responsible for incorrect zeportiig, �.w+.RY ..Y.M+{'t•NAYM^u......— ...._... .w..-. ...+«•v.....w.... .. ......vvl Kay..•'tr....._.�.�.w..........�._.—`.. ,... a,.a«...a.t+.:h:IC..:^i ti..:.i,t:.'�A.�:7(1r Wu�4'PIr17i%A"J.iCN.w.e' f . � —� -�:saa+xsasrrsthr+.+rn....r...,a. ��'.;''..•� 'sa however, the record should be set straight. Two (2) petitions approving the removal of the trees on. NicAllow Lane were presented to representatives. of Huntington Beach. These petitions were signed by homeotmers and ,apprcved by Huntington Beach personal responsible for the 'removal of trees. An eleventh hour, undated, one-line petition was sent to the *City of Huntington Beach which influenced -the retention of z . one or a possible two trees on Wicklow Lane, The'.valldity of this undated petition is questionable. For example, renters signing for: 'property owners without power -of attorney,, multiple signatures residing at a single addrss, ar dnp2icat1rig signatures. A copy: of.sa'id 'petition fs r -_ �- •.. 1. , 4 ;I jf included,as' Attachment A. •. " r•A:'request to the Huhtington 'Beach City Clerk revealed there! was no 'd umintatIon, such as' a permit on file; to retain. the two '(2) trees.' Statements of unpleasant remarks about the Th Trees ave e " #f rupvement would `not -enhance the 'posittan of the peoplii h =e! if ' tonight, as their concern is an eguitable' and responsible ' sh' democratic government by 'the City of Huntington Beach. i'. However the Huntington Beach City Government sh.ould be 'aware of these Eacts: - Y. . Contractor posted Hko PARKING - TOW-AWAY" signs on the street. 2. During the night, these signs were mysteriously removed i • '- a''•.YA Y.1...',M1.+s �-`�+..aw.rrYar+l.w M.'+r.lYM+FMIw'.w...!'T•.•�—.•+.�.w.ry....� A�' ,I' + •A .. - 1 t. - •7 '1 Ali t and placed In a dumpster at Glen view school parking lot. 3. Residents complied with the no parking, except the resident at 15851 Wicklow Lane, 4. Huntington Beach law enforcement were summoned, but for unknown reasons did not remove or cause vehicles to be removed, not even a citation was issued. 5, The. Foregoing created harassment for the contra'a'tor, added unneceasary expense to the City and the taxpayers and has indicated a double standard. 6, Addi ti onaI expenses will. result when the two (2) remaining, trees are removed. peini tong these trees to stand, the,, City:of ; Huntington Beach has assumed- the liability,for .the safety. . of persons and "personal property in the event these' trees .. should fall. . 8. The'•Cit ` yo, f, Huntington;`Beach.has gone through qr"eat expense'. to repair, the sidewalks to 'ensure 'safety and to repair'..`the curbs :and: gutters to ensuire proper water: tl ow and drainage. By`permitt�ng these trees to stand' neithe'r . of. these two . . goals will be met. r Certainly there Were h property owners who may have supported the retentian' of their tree but went along with the majority , for removal. Those same property owners now believe the 'City of Huntington has sold them short. The Government of the City-Hun ngton J each should be performed under constitutional democratic process and not c performed under intimidation. It is respectfully requested that aPProPriate action be instituted to remove Ithe two '(2) remaining trees on Wicklow Lane. A copy of this. paper in hereby tendered to the Huntington f Beach City Council . '�^•l w.Mwr/M.0.1iMM.WrN•. -'^ uM•..«.. � s . .. ,• «.y..: r:t•..•r.:<1,.; w-i:+al,t.SA.iK".+.a,wut"'�aw.w6:sx 1 mug At- Tie a^ � �3 •. �.';.y•=t..jj ��..,,rr�� ••.ter• •• .» •I• • �. "' LO .. ,.: ..� ::;.. .. .Is � phi �jr•�••t:•��•� .. it �U�.- � 5•'^ :rC/ tow (mot., ,., 1 577{ w/ r Z4 4 61Z } 1 C ..._.___._`•„�.•vswa• �....�„••�.. . •.1...�w..••.�..... ..syrK+•r.'•.•MI'.L+L+...,.L.•#[JtX:1':+.:'Js+W.'Mww'r.++�w:i A q . We, the fahlnNin+y residents of Wickl aw ln: s 1 ke the "parkway" trews, and wi eh'f ar 'Pm to rRmai rvtvAEiavir`al i cue`{do; .. , �•nat= "ant them to bra brutal .s 1 Y chapped •..•3• �••;.. 12 , td 16 �"f/ pry • �+��r - •fie .• 'w+.•Wnit►i+'.MY4aC«+WLGbf3fJt�Y•M..•.1•raw an • . • ••'•. .� ++sir.rw.rrr•»»�.ww,.•...•u.w.r..ww t...•w.tf i.+.i%.:•:r•«r•.. .n/:s••..•........._,.,,.,,,•. • • ••• ',. ,�• . ••.Hli1�*Mr.•+.+.wwr.w.w�,.•w•wr.�•u.ww. . ` MEQUES"I"" FOR CITY COUNCI(�CTID Date August 11, 1986 ; Submitted'to: Honorabie Mayor and City Council Members • �: x.'`. ;•.,-.. , , i'liOVED ISY QT'! CCIUt.t�ild ` .. : Submitted :. Charles W. Thompson, City Administratore, ' . . 19 tJt by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works act'. ANNUAL APPLICATION`►` SB-921 (GAS crrr ct,tair.' +} Consistent with Council Policy,. [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exceijtion Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: ?� Statement'of Issue t Each year 2% of the gas tax funds of the County are set aside by Senate B111.`821 for pedestrian and bicycle Improvements The funds are distributed by population. Thls year the City of Huntington Beach will receive approximately $64,424. Recommendatlon• -Approve Resolution land authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute. M1. Analysis: s 'r yt� The city has, for many years, used Senate Bill-,821 funds to provide sidewalks, access ramps, and bikeways aid audible signals.•This year the projects Include sidewalks, access ; ramps, bikeways, and audlble signals. The specific projects will be presented to the City i CouncilJoir approval prior to award of the construction contracts. Fumdint� Source: Senate Bill 821 funds ' Alternative Action: Do not take action and do not apply for fiscal 198647 funds. CWT:PEC:BW/paj P!o 044 • I I i i { .,t i i I JA �•• �QIJ 9 F6'R CITY COUNCI ACTION Date May 8, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Go oc `Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrat Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works K Subject:. Resolution Authorizing the City Engineer o A ve Lot Line Adjustments Consistent with Council Policy? [?cl Yes [ l New Policy or Exception Stater unt of issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: . -Statement of Issue: The..County c;f.. Orange requireO, _ne .city to authorize a designated. official to approve lnt 1ina adjustments. Lester G. Evans, the City Engineer, will be the designee. Recommendation: . ; Approve.. the resolution ., uthorizing the City .Engineer, Lester G. Evans, to approve lot line adjustments and direct the City Clerk to file the resolution with the Orange County Recorder. r.Arialysis: City- lot line adjustments must be recorded with the orange County -Recorder. They will accept the lot line adjustment if it is _ 'accompanied by a city resolution for each application or if the city authorizes an official to approve the lot line adjustment. In ordeer to expedite processing the applications, the City Engineer will be. the designated city official. Alternative Actions: Require a separate resolution of City Council for each lot line adjustment prior to recordation. ` Funding Source: None. CWT:PEC:WAP:lw P101104 6,9 • 'i • J • L PRODUCTIVITY/IMPROVEMENT STATUS REPORT ' 9 FOR HUNTINGTDN' BEACH CITY COUNCIL PRESENTED BY: BRIAN SMITH GREGG CASWELL TONY DUARTE + MIKE FUENTES BILL TAYLOR 1630G/550B NDVLMBER 22, 1982 }' . - i Page 1 STREET MAINTENANCE i STREET CLEANING ; ASPHALT CONCRETE i i i Page 2 STREET CLEANING ' SWEEPER ROUTES T BEFORE: 24 MILES A DAY PER ROUTE 36 ROUTES 4 DRIVERS . . AFTER: . . R. 31.45 MILES AVERAGE I' 29 ROUTES 3 DRIVERS REGULAR (I DAY REQUIRES 4 DRIVERS) NEEDED: CROSS TRAINING BETTER SCHLOULING F ff 0 VACATIpN I . I SAVINGS: $25 j I89 • Page 3 STREET CLEANING (CONTINUED) SWEEPER DEBRIS BEFORE. CITY CLEANS AND HAULS DEBRIS $29,319.35 TOTAL COST 1,070 MANHOURS PER YEAR AFTER:. CONTRACT TO HAVE DEBRIS HAULED $19,604.00 TOTAL LOST , 282 HANHOURS SAVINGS: $9,715.36 PER YEAR OR $16,266.16 IF PURCHASE OF A NEW TRUCK IS ELIMINATED 788 MANHOURS SAVED t i „ ,s•.wefpw.p',°y x'. 'r, ., t1-. '�—”' ... —".""�7;' r .. ir. ,. .. 1 Page a ASPHAL T PAVING CREWS CITY CREWS AND CONTRACTOR CONSOLIDATION OF TRIPS TO ASPHALT PLANT PRODUCTION LINE MECHANIZATION ASPHALT CONTRACT ANALYSIS OF DATA GATHERED i • 1 Page 5 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE :. MAINTENANCE CYCLE ` ' FLEET UTILIZATION �. . .. PAPER FLOW } BUILDING MAINTENANCE AUTO EDDY SECTION WN--- - Page '6 r MAINTENANCE CYCLE ^'4 'PRESENT MAINTENANCE CYCLE s NUMERICAL SERIES ALL "CREATED SAME F T. LAST CYCLE HAD 355 r -. nURA TION 3 1/2 4 MONTHS y RECOMMENDED SYSTEMS zt •,i STICKER SYSTEM r' RIG BOARD SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS ALTERED' GAS BOY BEING EMPLOYED (ODOMETER READINGS) COMPUTER SYSTEM IN '6 MONTHS (HISTORICAL DATA) BENEFITS OF IMPROVED SYSTEM PM AS NEEDED IDENTIFY UNDER UTILIZED VEHICLES COST SAVINGS OF $8,000 ANNUALLY IN LABOR ALONE VOESN'T INCLUDE FRINGES ± t UOESN'T INCLUDE PARTS, FLUIDS USED i page 7 FLEET UTILIZATION NUMBER OF -VEHICLES ( 244 PIECES .WITH "ODOMETER READINGS . 40 PIECES READ BY HOURS 79 PIECES WITH NO WAY TO MONITOR USAGE APPROXIMATELY 360 ,TOTAL PIECES PM ED BY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE USAGE ODOMETER READ 6,170 MILES/YEAR . AVE. HOURS READ 537.5 HR/YEAR AVE. ` CAPITAL OUTLAY UNDER UTILIZED VEHICLES. LOOKING AT NEW VEHICLE PURCHASE f REQUESTS DEFER PURCHASES UNTIL STUDIED TRANSFER UNOLR UTILIZED VEHICLES TO LIKE REQUESTED VEHICLES I ' NECESSITY FOR REQUESTED REPLACEMENT E.G. GRADER, DUPLICATED PIECE ELSEWHERE I . I I i I I ° a I .,I F i • i Page 8 PAPLRFLOM PRESENT SYSTEM HIGHLIGHTS MULTIPLE FORM. STORED SEVERAL. i' LOCATIONS FOR VARYING DURATION ,, 1 . COPY OF MULTIPLE' FORM DISCViOEp LABOR: RECORp `pISCAROEp DAILY , ''' SUMMARIES .NOT USED T INFORMATION GAP ON LUBE CHARTS GAS BOY RECORDS GAS INFORMATION t J i i . 'i f . { • I . II {I I Page 9 BUILDING MAINTENANCE r, PRESENTLY IN AUTO BOCY SECTION HIGH COST- OF RESTORATION RUST, BODY, PREP, PAINT r' { RANGED FROM 440 DOLLARS TO 2000 ; DOLLARS (SEDANS h P10 .S) OTHER HIGHLIGHTS =`R' NO INSPECTION PROCESS -OTHER THAN - RANDOM-VISUAL OR OPERATOR REQUEST s. UNTIL RECENTLY, . LITTLE COORDINATION WITH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE . . . L!lADWORKER RUNNING FOR PARTS RECOMMENDATIONS PLACE AUTO BODY SECTION UNDER VEHICLE MAINT ADDRESSES REGULAR INSPECTION PROCESS COORDINATIONi OF WORK AND VEHICLE EVALUATION BETWEEN 2 SECTIONS r - CONSOLIDATE PARTS RUNNING s i Page 1O SEWER MAINTENANCE LINE MAINTENANCE: .. PUMP STATIONS L• 1 r Page 11 LINE MAINTENANCE A VACTOR i 2 CREWS 2 MEN EACH ' 319 MILES - RESIDENTIAL 40 MILES - ARTERIAL PRESENT FREQUENCY -- 18 MONTHS SAFETY I. i l.�S ;. j�.1�1 :r1i., •.tj: � Sti ' t fr .., .t.. ,.• : r,,. .. .� .!± .,'r-*!y -� r}, t L. .r'}. Y fr - • +t.•. .. .Y:'r.wr<��r,At l• r Page' 12 LINE MAINTENANCE (CONT'O) >.. • C > PROPOSED: 1 MAN CREME — RES"IDENTIAL 2 MAN CREWS ARTERIAL SAFETY SAVINGS 2 MEN . PM" PROGRAM ' it ••i { • _ .''• vy T.V. INSPECTION s+. t'• r ' ,. rrsnr.wwvcv.w.►..... .,------•-.-.-..�•+-...�..•...«•.....,......r.,..-.«,...«.•»., ....�.a..,.....,:x. r.t„e::.•..w�...-+w ....+c.....w•wai:9::«f'�'rti.a`��'tC:K.tI�I'#•.»�"S.i+'�"w"'` •Paga 13 PUMP STATIONS . :h PM SCHLOULL r , 33 PUMP STATIONS 4 PEOPLE 1 �.-_. .....-....`.�..-... _....—�-,... �+........_..__..,.�,,.•...�.w-�.r. .. ,�.. .. ... ......,...c... .........,,.,•,,, :L.:✓... +:a..'i+.i l�.-lj:+Cii9d"✓J!wsgw. ' i Page 14 WATER DIVISIOM PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION , • - — :fie. • Page 15 PRODUCTION STORM OR•AIN3 WATER WELL PUMPS ; STAFFING f 7 PEOPLE ! } FUNCTION f *. PH REPAIR ;i. TELEMETRY : ' , r Page 16 DISTRIBUTION r t. ME'TER READING ` .MLTER REPAIR r FIELD` CRENS S� Page 17 . METER HEADING " DOMESTIC FIRE SERVICE. J 3 .; ' . .•1.. grey; x J CITY METER. r 1 :` ,:. ;Y • . ;�; • .• � Page 18 , • DDMESTIC �I 3D DISTRICTS PRESENT SEQUENCE PROPOSED SEQUENCE ' ✓ WAITING- FOR HANDHE[ DS ;` •' .• � Page, �9•� `~ +. DOMESTIC (CONTINUED) { DELINQUENT BIDS t .. FORMER PROCESS F 'PROPOSED PROCESS 'l tj t �YY 1 ,. jf � •. :t r t_ J ..�t• - t <: .f { MAfIL.LATE Bid _ SAVINGS: POSITION t ' � �. ^........_.._,........ .��..� ......^..�....•.,....-...._........... ... ....�..... ,. .. .. ..... .... ... . .. ... .t... y ,,..s.,..Y...:.,...:.`.Y-..,.... ..eta.' I I P 'Oe 20 ; FIRE SERVICES . " PRESENT METHOD is f t • i, ... r r _ I l3 `_ -. it/. PROPOSED METHOD }L CITY'MIJERS ' FIiE'SENT HETHOD PROPOSED METHOD ` ' '' '� • • ' : • ' • '. � '• t � is i; •,•r�•, .. , + - r It -, f: ✓:•t : :..tt r-'•,.', . t.•.....�... ,.... . ":'`. •. ^rN: °rat..^•g'..•r'.•'.Y� ^..wa.._.. f..•s ,^• ?All RE � t FOR CITY CON ACTI +QI� ON e 'y' ' r w Dam March 13 , 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council , Subntitt charles W. Thompson, City Administrator: by: PPaul E. Cook,. Director .of Public Woks roomw W: James W. Palin, Director, Development s . bje APPROVAL OF PLANS."AND,,SPECIFICATIO FOR TH ST PRESERVE FENCE RBLOCATION 4, ConMshnt with Cautwcil Ooiicy? (g) Yes [ l New Policy or Stswwit of ie, i;eeamrrnndatior,AnOy*,Funding Source,Akwnsd"Actkm,A ts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: t' e r o' 1'oc,d Control Act hat th t F n Section':15 ,of the, grange. C un y• 'requires . Citg:;Council approve plans and specifications for any work performed 'Within City 11mits. RECOMMENDATION: . Appzove the 'plans .and spii' ecifications for' •the Least Tern Preserve . . Ferrce .Relocation to accommodate the proposed Talbert Channel Ocean Outlet. ANALYSIS. The .'purpose of. the 'rence, reldcatian,pro jeci.," is to :develop,..an 1 extension 'to ;,the' *Least Tern ..Preserve: which :is securely fenced;.and' ',, which has an:.openp flat: nes.tifi4 habitat similar, to tha4ha�it_at: in ,... the, euis' .,t1n 'Least Teiif- Preserve. The' expansion wi1Z'!fa�itlitate!. the "successful relocat'•.:n of the`16 se Tern colony, if required;for'. the ' h:ew -Talbert:,Channel ocean outlet: 60ha ruction:•of:• the:,project must ' 'be,:completea before •April 1, ..1986,. when 'the',.Least ,Teras. begin - - 'neEtiing: . • The•••City is,.only approving an expans" ion of the,.nesting ,site at this time. Fut+ire actions are subject to a monitoring program. The Department. of Development Services has determined that,. oue to the _`crftical.'time.;constraints, an emergency exemption from the Coastal Development Permit requirement will be granted. FUNDING SOURCE: :Funding is by the Orange County Flood Control District. Flo sin ..,r.7.r..u.;.usHi,...s,.:....+:.u,rn:7:::.':�s.:..:-ti1s.•irYa:,u nrrw+'.....+..++..,.ew..rn.sw,arwr.+M.' ,. _ r 11 `+x+ 1�;aht�. t.s•t1�"1... .�,. .. i' i r.,• .r'r•! '+.i 7 ',r .>. •! r' s•s-- r!� !,q M t'rt' w' ! 1 >•a.-a�5:. I ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 'Do .not approve the plans and specifications. 'ATTACBMENTS: , t _ `L. Plan or �p:oposed• project. '.� a° 2. : . Letter of Emergency Exemption from Coastal Development Permit. PEC/JVIP:LCo.kla ,. .. .. .. ..CfAI RCA - 3/13/86 -2- (4313d) � +.w:Mwirra^.+ors.+raaraats'-a.+�.5+atfStrtit:ii;.Lil-+F.F fJ�. iGrr.ruw....++.........wwr,eeiraos,r• ti.. I • •.�.wu...i•.vl.nseuL►r"c•'.c'.•:vs�'... �:�•r-.�:.,:n^a,•. . '• :�{ar..w,•. t,�.w .+ 1 .. •� r' ny'1 1.�:• A:fin. � � 1 •��•,1P1 t1:. �� • . t 1 .� ,fir 1 ! •1 i I i 1 •' 1, 1 , ._, � ; aL G by M�~ '•. ' 1 •� •.� t• 1•►n l l I ' .. •� U , '+4i,;'` 4 II 1 f 1,-1 t •,I�w ;51 t_ ' �� (� f ��.,,� ' • is .� t: � i� •'"�• �� IC.1_,�,f , t.c' ,� ok VI Ln I>t ,� ;� /•)s, ��. • ,,y�J,+ �._"•� a '�� t•,ili '.'•)•yr 1 i' • .:;C, 1 •� }ix � ,, • , ;r.,� � ,ems=}{t`'V• • °�:•'�• ;1.�j�- 1 ! ! 1 � t ` � 1i. x •� N. � '•`,.. S I •! .. 11! .+. .• lf:/ �,1�q •1�Py� ',�• II t� ' � I ' • • 14e •fir. 4 ni& CITY OF HUNTINLo-t ON BEACH P.O.BOX i90 CALIFORNIA 926Q DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT VURVICER /I,rfLOINQ DIVISION e7141 Ss UAII PLANNING DIVISION ettW sxWn t February 2891986 Mr. Bob Richmond 12 Civic Center Pfaza Post Office Box 4048. Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Dear' Mr. .Richmond; W0, are, aware that,you intend. to„enlarge the 'Ciliforaia: Least.Tern Nest ing..Area,'r.Which is ,lbiiited-'on the beach ncar Braokhurst arid. . Pacific',`Hi&tay,,;to' de;te'rmine:whether or�iriot the, nesting'•area can, : eventually,..be moved to accomadate, the':widening::of the; .Talbert Channel. As."evi'denced by., the, major flooding which,occurred in ';our. City in 1983, improvements to the "channel. are-imperative'. o .the safety,of: the lives and:prop zty., of- our citizens. ', Another disaster.'of,,that magni- tulle, -could occur. at any. time., The ,City• is very.1 anxious to. see the iiaprovementscompleted as . soon as possible.,,. Since, the-:enlargement of;. the, nesting area is a necessary-first step td' channel; improve- ments'.and it must be,:c6mOlete'd before ,the:"nesti.ng season" begins in',April,...we are exempting your project from.:a :coastal development • permit under Section 989.5.3. 7 of the Huntington' Beach Ordinance >' Code. af -you'.have any7questions, please contact Jeanine Frank of my staff t [71 ) 536-52 1. Si r y s James W. Palin ' Director, Development Services JWP:JF:jd .,,,,..,:.. ��_...a,.•..e+..arn.a�,u-ear..+,r+r.tMia.:r.i,Y::C>:'t;5:.. .:.•r'L.n,..«xi:r.+...+�" aNA.•w.::L..sK IrN......•-..-.+-.-••.�-wr.........-'^-- fix+ r v•. - . 9. e � %" a . w r w il&vr4 Pinks a aM k6s ;- Aide Isis roll 46 by D of the.Svo4h roe Court of Or ecree wnty, z4p aal.dmt� , t14, d4lW 29 8*plomber. tsat. and r STATE OF CALIFORNIA /• {�� County of Orange rtiw+c N..o. p�,.... `�~ • `j9 rr w wi..�.n� r ra. •s9 lltq,IC ipSICE :<r set w� .m w rcr c�c�w wry I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of GF XTatlanae �. the`County aforesaid: l am over the air of goteen s '' years, and root a party to or interested In thr'below :; OTICE - eratltled-matter. I am a principal cleric'of the Orsnpe � � Y' Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined 'the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, rsrMw,�llma ;)rinlod and published`In the.City of'Costa Mesa, •< County of Oran Sy�late of'Colifornia and that s oalrldr.0w M FtlbYic Hearin ' 'Nolko of all p"'oni wool tMtlt M. ialfOri 4 ikipi& bdrA �{t« •s. 't er It'�Cmvl TAM of which copy attached hereto is a true and completov ,:M; wSWrOW ' copy, twos printed and published In the Costa Mesa, GUL Newport Beach, Huntington Beads, Fountain Valley. nirto.Na:�olxi+"AN NNA%M oF$M1Z'CttY6� Irvins,_IN South Coast cOmmunities and Lajuna HUNTINGTONJ4aEnC Beach issues of said nevrotpaper for �!t�w P�Coate PT, :' o� epKt[mutK�ttoe issue"of aECilltillL`�e.eM�To � �eturlo�r 'FA Dt:fiBy Pic FA TiONB�itSrluPtlaLIL� • December 20 85 �•t A� s ' p1t�7Mm�orllttslr !::1k•ir�`'1s�tlfTHles�� ., 199 oit7M8 aTa M►M.aaw.�aeww�t opG,ior.s�oiR�+r warfawxn , +�•�� eaeor�j aMitts,�and i suf�lrid t#It'psivOMl '•,.� am oat Ile tilra tows bow al bw 198 tl °wiTau i art aauWA , a, Carl I�t►lrlaro rqw , i dsc are, under ®Welty, of perjury, foregoin is t P , that thet° :r.., rue and-correct. •1:.:�'':F!41� : EXecuted'On December 24 198 .°� AMt a at Costa Moo Cailforrila. , Signaturo ,�i J-j'. •44.IfY. .www.rrr+w. +.avwrs.,.a,a,+yl sl w,Lii.Il, �.�'j3r• R•./i:f.Lnli'.•.,...r•ar.Y.rM...wr...•++.w...�yD.Ac ..ww..MRaI r..r.s..��••�......:.. ._..rr.�....r,!.,.'r'M�y ��n+arse/yu�iu'giffia`yr,n,M.FSa' •r JL4M *'tll' >r ?Y/15iStl't's 1Yi* ESe/r7' ASITY{y4+iTaa.7•�'x'F�•'Jai-M++ytl'ad:h�•tik n■c)N.3N:.*•ar: sw.•.Y..aiDPT r. Publi. 12/19/85 r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1995 EDITION OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC UORAS CONSTRUCTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 !Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the stateslents of all persons uho wish to be heard relative to the application described belay. DATE: Monday, January 6, 1986 li TD1E: 7:30 P.M. I ' APPLICATION NJHBEZ: 1965 Edition of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction PROPOSAL: Adopt-Ordinaince No: 2813 - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY.OF HUNTINGTON•BEACH tAMDING THE HUNTINGTON,BEACH HUIlICIPAL CODE BY AHEI'iDING SECTION 12.10.010 TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 1.085 EDITION OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION." ON FILL': A copy of said proposed Ordinance 2813 is on file in the � Office of the City Clerk. ALL INTRREkED'PERSONS are invited to attend said tieaiing and expressopinions or aubioit evidence.for.,:or against the application as outlined above. All applications; exhibits, and desciiptions'of this , propos:al are on':file.irith the Office of th , City Clerk, '2000 Main Street, Hunti.ngtoa . Beach, California, for inspection by•the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY`COUNCIL • By: Ali Wentworth Alicia H. e nt orth City Clerk Phone 7 3 -( 14) 5 6 5405 f� ' i f I c .,.w.wrr.wr.nnw ..�.�.� � ....��.�. w..rrwy,µ.IvrY"N x.s..viq....+*r+••+.r�. .V�XaR.ED�ffU%'w•""•--••'.•7 •., •••Rtl r .. •. yr,. `. . ,air••'o_ � .: �• � F r � } t ' , �i..y 1 !'. ,'.i h ^�T �� • .1� �'�,�} � I V 1'A' r l ��4 r t'.( 1 J r 4 �+/ ^. 11', (rr� r' yr �' ,.Fr •.rr , 1.' r� �5,,' *":1}.S'� .br.,,._� �(�klj ,��y:l. �� ,j:if••� ,.4i ''�.f.'7:Lr''Iyr:V�) ....R.•., � 'fir.'! 1 ��,, .��q V,:i�r 1. :!" fWv� r. vx�. i «f ti� ,Y.f r urre !r�i�'r., f��+�"�+�•# .�� '1�"1'� f. f / }h ;1r.. �",d, ^'`�• r, s I �;•e�tiS`RT.. .�`L j'sy�'' . W", ;,�Ty • ';I"�1, ./r �. �yt ,I� GY i F r1;� 'i� -1 I t . t.er�},?�'�rl/�f,y;;;1S.rn¢Ii��Y:��,1 �•�?:i: .:.J,�,.'7IF►I�.�T.!J`:i,YJ:.�1�.1��u:� SAi't. � � r a r .• • • ♦1 • « I •' r / I w •/ • a I r.4a I � IQ= 1 a 1 a / aEN-Mlu • I r 4 il• 1 •i L• �♦ .• r.- • .1 • 1 I •. •• .-ram• J •� we lob 0 •1 • •1 • ••• • • s• �• rl • 664 • • 1 • � Lam. . I � • •^ .1 .r • • 1 1 1 • I 1 ••- � 17 • Ta (ps- �/ • 1 h REQUE f FOR CITY COU�lCib�. ACTION q Date May 97 1985 ,Submitted to: Honrrable Mayor and City Council a� Submitted fay: Charles W. Thcmp:ton, City Administrat Prepared by: Robert J. Franz, Chief of Administrative ServI ,4 ' sabject: Resolution Adopting the State of Califo men Transportation Right-of-Way., Relocation and H Wig 57 Goraiitont with Council Policy? fXl Yes � ] Now Policy or Excaptian [' Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,AttKhnmts: Statement 'of lssue: .The local Cal Trans repeovientative has informed us that a pre-requisite for the City being pre-qualified to handle Federal Right-of-Way Administration funds, is the City Council's adopting Cal Trans Right-of-Way, Relocation and Housing Manuals. Recommendation: Adopt the Cal Trans Right-of-Way Manuals by Resolution. `Anal`sis: On March 15,' 1985, a RIgh.lt-of-Way'Task Force was establish"..The.puipcse..of this bask;Force is to facUitate the City being-pre-qualified as a'.Agent of Cal,Tram.using FederaL Highway'Administration funds for the,•acquisition,.relocation and`appralial review incidental to right-ol-way activitles. A pre-reyuisite:for being certified b y Cal.'Iians is the adoption, by. resolution, of the Cal Trans'Regulations as set forth in their Relocation and Housing Manuals. The reason':it is advante'geo:is:to the City,to'be certified'by. Cal Trrans' Is jhat street improvement dening `;Snd`other projects,utilizing Federal,Iiighwaylti ids will be`able: to be accomplishedymuch` fakir.;- Under,�ourrenti procedures,,.. the City must;cantraet with CSTm t6rell Tra ' 'of these`servkim Thii is a cumbersome, expensive`and slow process..;Only one other.cit In the County (Santa Ana) teas met.the stringent• uireiinents'of,Cal.Trans'to become'certlfWd, `therefore, our. Cityls'obtainment :of ,pr�ualificatiolf and ulfimte certification will be quite an accomplishment and credit to the City and its staff. Fundtr Sow-tee: Federal Highway Administration. •Alte�native Action: Do not adopt`resolution. Attachments 1. Administrative Regulations 2. Right-of-Way Task Force Chart 1311j P10 4154 f: "'�"_^�»w.r.:.,✓.;.M..t6x'...>x«:....•.t,.t':..:.�.:::.aYL;i:,:d}.1.:'w:...t,..:•a.d+J'rh+wv.«*w...wY �lK'N:..,.:.tfl.:;.r',?L'ri:['C.+'.J,J,cwM r+n+r....+•...sa�x�� ---- ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR ham► Number.* 801 Sections: 1-6 Effective bate 03/15/85 , SUBJECT: Right-of-Way Task Force I. Pu!pose. This Administrative Regulation Is to establish a Right-of-Way Task Force. 2. Authority. Charter of the City of Huntington Beach, Section 401. 3. A2gUcatlon. This regulation applies to all CIty departments. 4.;;. Poll•` The City.Administrator viil head this Task Force. The organization chart attached describes the staft required to accomplish the goals of the task force. The City has adopted the policies and procedures'of the CalTrans Right-of-Way Manual The City further adopts the'organization chart attached. 5. R f.Mmiibillties. 5.1 The City Administrator appoints the Real property manager as Right-of-Want.agent. The Real Property manager is responsible to the Chief at Administrative Services. 5.2 The Attorney's Office will provide personnel qualified In right-of=way legal matters, to assist the'right-ot way agent. 5.3., ;Administrative services;shall provide finance and accounting support in ' accordance with CalTrans accounting and audit manuals. 5.4 Development-Services shall supply personnel and data to insure that the Ca1TMans right-of-way standards are maintained. l 5.5 Redevelopment and Housing shall provide a project coordinator and a. ;•� specialist to help develop Relocation Assistance plans. " .5.6 The Public Works Department shall provide engineering services„ survey' services,.and plans to use In'right-of-way acquisition. The schedules developed by Public Works will be used by the right-of-way agent to plan the activities of other members of the Task Fcree. 6. <Proceilure. -To provIde'. for' orderly acquisition and development of -of-way projects se forth,In the CalTrans right-of-way manuals. ' All,departments .will provide support services necessary to completethe right-of-way acquisition'task in compliance with the CalTrans right-of-way manual. -Charles W. ompson$ City Administrator 0039A 'CRY Of Huntington Beach �i.'liY.lTVra.+...+.+.....waver "^^+++r.ww:r.MKW'?ww.....ww••,..w..sw .M. .ssw+rr+«`..•.r.r'r..+..^... r-1:bHd.S.r...war,.. '-LN✓.J4'iwE«d\i:ti{na4w/f• ,+.swr+..ww'w..wutxi.41fX • ft FLOERAL. A10,:-. JR8AN._ - CITY'. :H�iNT11ST+4�1 @EAGH RIr#HT OF WAY' TASK FORCE HUNT IN GTON '_REACH- j CIT., COUNCIL = Wp:. CITY, ADMINISTRATOR : s i CITY ATTORNEYS PUBLIC WORM4 . ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT REDEVELOPMENT <. OfFICE :.= O@PT. >'-~ SERVICES : SERVICES AND:HOUSING CITY'ATTORnEY"' DIRECTOR OF AUSLIC CNIEF OFAOMINSTRATIVE' OiRECTOR OF a>rilEt.OP RED€VElOPNENT CO- 0 ASSISTANT CITY AT, MHk8115 SEAYl6ES' DENT SERVICES ORDIINATOR ..TORN€Y- s CITY ENGINEER . •DIRECTOR Of FINANCE __ • PLAINER • SPECIAL'PROJECT NEYOTY CITY ATTOR- a TRAFFIC ENatMEER; . • ACCOUNTING OFFICEII COORDINATOR •.L GAL".IIITERN3�. , •CIVIL`ENGINEER'AS-' 3 f i .. REAI. PROPERTY .' LINE OF AUTHORITY MAHAGEME"T,9;;,.. . OfAL PROPERTY'IiAw -. •--�---—= LINE OFCOMAkUNICATION- GERAIGHT.Of.MAY O RKLOCATtQ"SP€C"n'r UA P110p��ttA S► 'DTIATION . .. .. - S Y.1-24.85 REQUf�S 'FOR CITY COURiCiI'°°'ACTiOfV �e s� Date blay 9, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �G V1. Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat S► f .6e Prepared by: Robert J. Franz, Chief of Administrative Servi Su qj Resolution Adopting the State of Califo men Transportation Right-of-Way, Relocation and H uals Consistent with Council Policy? Ix Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception - y" Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Statemen" of Issue: The local.Cal Trans representative has'infarmed'us that 'e pre-requisite for the City being pre-quallfied to handle Federal Right-of-Way.Adminlstration funds is'the City Council's adopting Cal Trans Right-of-Way, Relocation and Housing !Vfanuals. Recommendation: Adopt the Cal Trans Right-d-nWay Manuals by Resolution. = Anrelysis: 4n' March 15, 1985, a Right-of Way Task Force was estadllshed., The purpose..of- ` thiss.Task;Force is to tacilltate the City being pre-qualified ass:Agent of Calro,'h�ens using Federal Jiighway,:Administration funds for:thta.;acquisition, relocation and appraisal`review in'cWhtgAo right-�of-way,activities. A pre-requisite for being certified by Cnl Trans is`the adoption,,.by resolution, of the Cal Trans Regulations as set forth in their Relocation and Housing Manuals. Tne so rean it is advantrr;eous to the City to.,tie certified by Coil Trans is 'that street Irnprwemeiit =widcnirzg and.:othpr projects utilizing Federal Highway faun will'berable'Ao be. accompllstied,�much faster. Under,.cucrent,:-procediues,: the..City ,must ,contract;with Ca1;Trans foc:all of these services.. This is�a cumbersome,-expensive and slow;process:-';'July one:other city`;iri the County (Santa'"AnsJ has met the stringent requirements'of.Cal Trans:to become. certified,,the,store,,our. City�s obtainment'.of:.the prrque]itication;and. ultimate certification will be quite an aecomplishment and credit to the City and its staff. FunSciurce: Federal HIghway Administration. Alternative'Action:' Do not adopt resolution. Attachm :; 1. Administrative Reguir tlons 2. Right-of-Way Task Force Chart 0010, 1311j PIO 4184 F , :�rJ3.u.t✓r'++�*wusfw..�.r+'w�wtw.r.+wa+rorrfi:.iz'laT'••.r..*..ae.rw+s►+r.:.r...r�" �`� K.::i�.c'.1..•r1.�,..:�.i-.1t'h+.r.riw+.r w.a.iv.c..�.:ibtla.�.M• ...r. ..«----+�.. .:. "-- �- ADMIMSTRATIVE REGULA .dONS ~ OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR Number. 801 Sections: 1-6 I Effective Date 03/15/85 SUBJECT: Right-of-Way Task Force ku ose. This Administrative Regulation is to establish a Right-of-Way Task Force. 2. Au_61(ili y. Chaff ter of the City of Huntington Beach, Section 401. 3. Apolication. This regulation applies to all City departments. ' 4.' Polio The'City,Administrator will'head this Task. Force. The organization chart attached describes the staff required to accomplish the }goals of the task force. The City;has adopted the policies and procedures of the CalTrans Right-of-Way :da"huaL The City further adopts the organization chart attached. r 5. Responsibili'ties. 5.1 The City .Administrators appoints the Real , Property manager as Right-of:Wai agent. The Real Property manager is responsible to the Chief -of ' Administrative Services. 502 , -The Attorneys Office will provide personnel qualified in`right-bf-way s legal matters,to assist the right-of-way agent. 5.3 .'Administrative'Services shall provide finance and accounting support In y accordance.with CalTraris accounting and audit manuals. , 5:4_. Development Services shall supply personnel and data to insure that the CalTrana right-of-way standards are maintained. ! 5.5 AWavelopment and Housing shall. provide a project coordinator 'and a specialist to help'de.,elop Relocation Assistance plans. : >S46 .: The Public Works:Deparimenv shall provide ,engineering services, survey services;aw plans--.to' use in `right-cf-way:acquisition. Tine schedules developed by Public Works will be used by the right.•-of-way agent to plan'the activities of-other members of the Task Force. 1-7 6. . , ProaedLre. To provide; for orderly, acquisition.:and.development of right-of projects"set forth in the CalTrans right of-way manusts. All departments.will provide support service necessary to`complete the right-of-way acquisition :ask in compliance with the CalTrans right-of-way manual Charles W. lbomosor4 City Administrator a. Cray of Hunting#on Beach 0039A ."'_.`^._•"—^+.+�w+...r.+.+rw.....+r.w.awa.►a.•wrwJ...•»w•a.u-++►.th:7:sw•y..li,.+':...t:.�. .,,a.t.tow....r......,,,,,,,.+M1,aw.'+t+a•FAN:•).:u.rtlL`:sl'Jalfu�i�.w+�',—';•}!„"`�.+,' F.EDERAL., AtD,;uR8AN- CIT.Y. . .OF ':HUNTiiGTONa BEAGH RlOpHT W.,WAY-TASK FORCE 07 HUNT IN GTON,.BEACH z CITY- 'COuNCi1 ;..:.. . ....,..... 7 '(ADMINISRATTOR;:. .. . ,;ITY ATTORNEYS ' PUBL.IC:WPRKS. ADMINISTRATIM" DEVELOPMENT-.... REDEVELOPMENT OFFICE...., DFPT:'.:_�.. SERVIiCES -:;� .. SERVICESa-- AND:-.HOUSING, s CITV ATTORIIEY .. CIRECTOWOF PUBUC'- vl11EFOFADM1NISTRATIVE OIREGTOR10F,Kk OP= REDEVELOPMENT CO- 0 ASSISTAIT Clir AT- WORKS SERVICES' iiEbT SERVICES. ORLlNATOR t' f ., TORM�Y • CITY ENCIMEER . s DIRECTOR Of MANOR • PtANIIER SPI:CIAL FflGdiCT 0 MEYnTY'CITY ATTOR• + TRA►FiC EkCINEER a ACCOUNTING O"101 ft COORDINATOR • tE(iAL,IMTERM3 i CIVIL'EN6INSER A$- iISTAMTr y. , 000or .0000 - 010 . ,: ' REAL.PROPERTY-.' - LINE°OF'AUTHORITY MANAOE�AEN'F REAL=pAQAERTYIIMAMAr ; LINE OFCGM�NICATION='; GERIM64TV WAY . -� NItt4CATIQIt�CIAl.i'!T� � . w'. EA �ROPlJRTY'-ANA ttS %NEi'iQTIATION .. S Y. i-24.OS r to .. RE UL�' FOR CITY COUN 2A �`IO 126 H 85-7 L,l Date February 25,1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members _ o'er Submitted by: Charles W.'lhompson, CIty Administrator - `- • �..f Gl ..tq t'repered : Douglas N. La Belle,•Deputy Director of Redevelopm �ubjec:: ALTERNATIVE JOBS BILL FUNDS PROJECTS Gyz I, Consistent with Council Policy? [Xj Yas [ ] New Policy or Ex on �' • �' Statement of l os,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Atena t � NoAttachments:• . -Q01 STATEMENT,OF ISSUE: At the City Council mceting.of}Febru airy 19, 1985,sniff ivas directed to identify. additional, alternative projects`thatwould qualify under Federal'guIdelines as being. eligible to use the city's'remsining "Jobs"BW" alIocationfunds..Staff has'researched ;. and identified five (5) additional projects that'Mould qualify. Thes(i.additional projects have been prioritized and are being subnlitted for your conslderetion. . r RECOMMENDATION: The remaining Jobs Bill funds of$208,000 be used to supplement Pi�ase'I of the Koledo Lane Demonstration Project, (alternative Project No. 1) ANALYSTS: The ri6b Bill",funds,are gover,ied by provisions of the Housing and'Commmiity::,. 0eeV,lopment Aet'of 1979, aslmended. The laws•and regulations a iplicableto.,CDBG '( entitlement programs, including regulatory provisions governing el%glble activities, ippl►'to these fund,. . r Each activity assisted by "Jobs Bill",funds must be cliglble.under.CDBG rules" d ti usf niel et all of.the three broad national objeetives of the CDHG brogram;benefit to low and moderate'Income-persons;aid in the,prevention'cr Alm Ina tion of slums or blight;or meet other community development needs hiving a partteular urgency.:.In general, an activity:does not mect�the objective of benefiting the l.ow and moderate income persons on the basis thnt a majority of persons hired to carry out the activity are of a low End moderate income level. An ac:ivity'serving a middle or.upper income area,such as'an improveme'nt`of a J ;• public facility (beach service road), would not qualify as low and moderate income " benefit even though a majority of persons employed on such a project might be of low , : and moderate income. 11 P104184 , •:f�7 x V d?R:lci xs� i'.`rx:9i►•r..fs`.:..a i:,..;.:k:._..r�•:.,, . ,. ,....r.:.:;Ys.,..;::: r..:::.i.� ...... .�...: ,....r-..5+t '�-- z ..Futrtu.:re�ws.nve.aaSiiS i RH 85 7 February 25, 1985 Page Two When "Jobs BIU" funds are,proposed to provide rssistance to a "for.=profit",business (where necessary or appropriate to,carry out sit economic.development project-as within the downtown`redevelopment project rhea),qualifying such an activity,to benefit low and moderate income persons Is usually based on whether s majority of the permanent jobs created or retained will be available to low and moderate Income persons. Based on the applicable rules governino`CDBG'funds In general and those which are outlined above, staff has identified mid prioritized the following projects for your consideration:' 1. Koledo'Lanc.Dcmonstration Project. Located within'the Oakvlew Redevelopment Project Area, predominately occupied by'those ' of low and moderate Income level. As the first phase'of thu,Koledo Lane Project is underwa ;(contract i` awarded'etc.),with construction costs anticipated tt be 1575;000, the reinainin&.$208,000 Jobs Bill,funds could be used to offs-4,,these project costs{allowing,a similar`:amoimt of previously budgeted`CDBG funds to be used within the second phase of bakview's activities next program year;'or utilized for other qualifying projects. - Plans and specifications completed. f .i..`'.• 1 ,y�;w:: 'eAt,v. � a� 2. � , Me:Calien Park Site.:Youth•Recreation'Butldin :' This'site is locate within an area predominately, occupied., by,those 1of tow,and, mudert�te Income levels,in"which'the'anticipeted.users will be from that neight�octiood,'the r'emaiiiing;Jobs BiU.funas could be.used.to otfaet . construction'eoms.:';,, .Hans and specifications could be prepared witliin`rhrr;e 11 months. 3. 5tti t*,,dli 8�'reet}Cdnnectian:='fiis:would'quallfy ;ecola"A a bene t to;the owntown redevelopment•project`area. - .Pltws and specifications could be prepared within thine(3) months. �•. ..'_ `,•^si_}IT.�,�" '�r .t��" �"+ /1+i '•�11 '•'f.Sl'�.(� .'Y\w.'L.'Y1.^A K'i 11.:'CYn .. *:Libert 'Park�Nel hbd,6M Ini rovem' is (curbs• ttec ; sidew ks•.stree is. ,ete.); b wou qu y.as meeting objectives Fn providing an area occupied*by low'and moderate Income levels. - Plans and specifications could be prepared within three (3) months. 5: n.C:Hi°Meatari Modification.'..7'his would consist of anew signed to'be'installed at PCH and 6th Street-,with the existin`g'raked;median tieing modified to accommodate laft,turns.onto 6th Street..Tliis:would meet.the objective of qualifying ass an economic benefit since it's' located within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. - Plans and specifications completed. �iipM'M�+�.C.!'Xsnyf.+ml \1 i4 lt.a....c1:1.Sr:.uixr+..+..••a«,r.rYr�..+r.vw•x4i..i7.u�',{,.'\•..r.w..w,..r.uyr.a�r�w+►...w.y;;cy.•�C..:'.f.:e,!G..�«..e✓i:�:..�:i��'.nvw++..swce wraaa+'.+r►yr.,�`.n� r r 4: } I ffr , ' r v t • RH 85-7 February 25, 1985 Page three We have been notified by HUD that in order to retain our remaining Jobs DIU fonds,'an approved project needs to be Identified, 50% of remaining funds be expended by April, 1985 and the total project completed and funds expended by July? 1985. Due to these time constraints, staff Is recommending that you Approve alternative Project No. 1, Koledo Lane Demonstration.Project. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: ;'Approve.one of the other four(4) alternative projects or reject'the five (5) recommended alternatives and provide staff with further direction*. FUNDING SOURCE: :y Jobs Bill Funds; CWT/DLB/CPS:lp is 0718h �•,'�. T•.l'-0!iL'nw:waver.w�«++nuv'Wnw.r.c/.!wr.�:.'w...�,. .w..++r.+.tui.w.t..«.+...�.��..w— ...w«.....rr.rivK.J+.:4.t.«Y..i?Y k.'auwAr.w�.�. l' Coo K REQUE�. FOR CITY COUNCInA►CTION :ja ,J,, Dote December 16 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and Cety Council Submittal by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator&LO APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Propared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Wo E v Subject: APPLICATION FOR SB 821 GRANT FUNDS CITY CLEXX Consistent with Council Policy? [ l Yes [ l Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue,'Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actiow,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Each year, SB 821'funds'are made available to the City'of Huntington Beach ; ;for bicycle and pedestrian projects. The City Win the process of applying for the FY 85-86 allocation.77, ,5 RE COMMENDATIONs Authorize application'for SI3 821"grant funds'for design and construction of selected pedestrlan projects in the City. ANALYSIS: Staff his ident lfIad`fourpedestrien projects which are,"eligible for SB 821 funds ellaceted through the Orange County Transportation Commlc�slon. The projects and requested funding are as follows: Pro ect " , Funding Request 1. .Sldewa�lk m"pr`ovement,east $ 8'750 j side of Graham Street,,. : south of Mesdowlsrk Drive 2; SldBwalk'Im rovement south side`of Ellis.Avenue,west of Demion Lane 3. Wlieal Chair Ramps around the $19,000 't HunEIngfon Special Center (forgr ly Peterson School) ak Indianapolis and Beach Boulevard 4: Traffic Signets for the Blind at $109943 Main St./Ellis Ave./Beach Blvd. - Beach Blvd;/Garfield Street : - Main Street/P.C.H. - Main Street/17th Street $40,943 The total allocation request is for $40,943. The projects will be designed and constructed In FY 85-06. PI O I/8i v1<x. w..'.:..'n;,'1'a.4's+i r.l*+•:a e_ aa'�.. .'i4.-w/l:.i'viY.yY..y�.�.7:fc'A�il`3•:iX'.7t:.>,Z+ F O� f FUNDING SOURCE: Not funds required. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may deny authorization for the annual SB 821 funds and postpone`construction of the above-mentioned projects. PEC:HS:kla . •rr tr i RCA - 12/.16/85 -2- (3822d) � ..:..�».'•,..,,,..,........-.........i•n;.�..s.+4:+L}i rr'di:k{%:�i}.i�«a:«.s7wa"";+�"""• rwn•r,,y ll «�a...tK4:�)'sL:.1,$:,s• .. ' - - - - ,,.ri (:prat •r.z: r IQUE�, _ FOR + I�'YUNM '�AGT'It? 4 gate February 8, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council oA) All`y fps Submitted.by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director Public Works 44 Subject: PRuJECT REOMMENDATIONS FOR JOB'S BILL FMING 0 Consistent Kith Council Policy? [Xl Yes [ j New Policy or Excepiion Stat6nwMt of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STAM>EN'I' OF-ISSUE: At:its•February 4, 7985, Meting, the City Council required Staff to redirect the Job's Bill funds to, projects consistent ►d.th the Downtown Redevelopment plan. RF.C70MNUAT I ON: Approve:'66 pr6ject list and direct Staff to prepare plans and specifications for bid advertisement. "ANALYSIS: , The follot ng projects. are consistent with •the current Doinitown Development plans and can be constructed inediately: I. Constiuction 'of. median modifications and traffic signals on Pacific Coast Flighway„ between Alain 5trvet and 7th'Street. . Cast = $ 175;000,. 2. Realigmwnt of 6th',Sttreet between Orange Avenue and Sth'Street. Cost 3. construction of amenities dlong.realigned '6ih`,Street (street li(,;tits, sidewaik, lari l- srapiiig, etc.). Cost - $ 95.000 (Ciity's share). Project Number 1 ,is ready `to bid.and as totally 'consistent' with, thi--ftintarnm ra 'plan.: Re- a. . direction of'traffic, 6th Street •and:Oiange Avenue coincides with th.e.6.ther,projects currrhtly'proposed'-for those"areas. ,The flexibility to deal with Alain Street. traffic,- regardless of which direction it is flowing (or two-way., if established) exists in this plan. . Projects Munber 2 and 3 will require.design and plant preparation. They, are also coapera- ive projects with the developer of the, adjacent property and will require-the' developers redd.i.ne'ss'to construct on or about July 1st of this year, to allow the funds to be used as required. FUNDING SOURCE: H.C.D.. Job's Bill Finds in Account Nunber 894837 will"be emended as approved. ALTEIMT1Vi;`hCTIOy: 1. Reject the proposed projects and request additional alteni.Wves be presented. 2. Reject the use of Job's .Bill Funding for this funding cycle. 3. Direct 'the use of. the, Job's Bill Funds for a specific project of the' CoumcilIs choosing, consistent with the law. A'ITACH�W: ....................... �-� Location Maps 1 PEC:BG:ik ' t P10 4X4 Y•+3J'1.47.i•"�'+`i w+w.•+-*ww.wr+..w.r.+s aw.i:"...:...J,•....r f.0 K's a,r,•s,,Y.n-a r. :.. 'e...•tw SF w{•.."y:...•t...,.,,u-..r.,.....-... •. .•s.:.t a rt.a..•i Vie,c:-; v.,w{.1ir:rw'.MR•.'<.w.rrrnti.✓.r.ytY4;yd,Ryi�(ar�' r x SUF3JECY y , HB By- DATE _._..... CC NO. Wm 00 r j 'tC El f F r i Mi . 'a \ I t^.i �r'f� fEl cu 1 f �` ti 'o <+ /, 1 �1 �. 1 Ma .. {it717 . ' tv r a r-qr i .1 1Y a y *• 11 } I t �� OCEAN tQ C 12 CHKO.By DATE r SHEET NO. OF ti �/'`.Y vr�;i�•r:J:•:Q'lyaa•.+ �.r,!y. sr,..... ..:W ..:^t—c:�ra. « .. :.}�'au- ^'. w+n v.....yxf...fM::«is .� •� .•--.`.-,. �� a-. 7 i•r-.-.. ,. ,.• a � r!�``'!"' .7 .. '.�>:,':r:s•%•r%i7Y$'ly.:;v.,i;A.w�..,cai/.�'=�,+�'r+�i�r•� � 1 ' a F QlJES� OR CITY COUNCI ��CTI ' Data -ILUIX 16, 1984 , Submitted to; Honorable Mayor 'and City Council. Submitted by: C. W. 7ha rpson, City Administrator Cwf . Prepared by. Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Hike Trails Project Lvs t Statement of Issue;�Rewmmandation,Analysis, Funding Souror,Altsmadve Potion:,Attacnrrants:.. 9TA7.'EMM.CF:'1SSf1E: W start of the new fiscal ycaar, funds must ba reapp riated for the contfnuat o of the bike trails program. PlOaPproveeallocation of $282,485 to the accounts specified on the attached- : project list from the Grant Unagwopriated Rind Balance. S ri the Fiscal°year "ended on' June 30, 1984, those fmids budged fog•. bike trails- were iinadvertently.not carried forward into the rev year. It is row necessaiy for I: the Council.to reapgmve these f=1s in order t o complete the projeata. . x FMtVl G SOURCE: I'. giant U&Pprvporiated F3td Balance, for $282,485.00. D ppr ve the reappz iation. a , H3jte Tr :Y..I Pro7 a:t'List F.I.S. CWI:PDC:js:jy ' ;t�4181 it ..... ....A.r?t,.-4+n:Jr':su,u''d...::..:n•.:.t:i,c ''.l�ir«7",jS"fYrid"u71M�'! 41 • RE UE FOR CITY s"OUNCH. ACTION Date 4 Submitted to: Nonm.-able Mayor and City Council Submitted by: C. W. m`hamcson, City Administtutor toy( Prepared by:. Paul E. Cook, Director of Public marks , Subject: Allocation of Una_trpropriated Funds • SB 821 Project Funding (( Statement"of Issw Reca mm or.dation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attochrnants: _ . SVd'IIH.'] CP ISSUE: Mgt..be,tansferred fr6m the Unappropriated Fund Balance to the spevified project accounts for design and construction of Urodmeiv approved pedestrian and bikeway projects. Ap=cm 015ation of $71,842:00 to the accounts specified frem the Unapmopdriated Fund;Balance. . ANALYSIS: Ii t�inatan,Beach applied -fur and i6cuiiVed $40,000. (includixig intsaest) for SB 821 project applications submitted to'OCIC for, construction.in the ixming'year. 7tiesa projects were submitted to,the OTLC in' general categories r f work; i s e., sidewalks, access r&qm, etc. ,-,The Unappropriated Fund Balance Account (R 301) -ii-pludes . revenues received from the Orange County Transportation C mmission (OCaC) for Senate Bill. 821 Projects. The Project list is sh%m belCw, also oirganiz«l by aural cateroni, with specific project locations identified where they have been'detero"ed. Fach-of these projects will be returned for eonsiderat_ion in detail by the City Council-when authority to advertise for bids is requested. The first three projects are reallocations of funds ;lot s1xat on CMPI" projects and approved for reallocation to other projects by OG`IC. Account a- Pro � Ca 3 te S0' S�ii c Construction $26,617 A. Delaware,. U/o Garfield 2. OMS frontage on Gothard 631 Talbert Bikeway $ 3,060 637 Hamilton Bikeway $ 2,225 640 *Sidewalk Access Rwrps . $250000 (Locations to be determined during design) 641 *'Audible Signals for Visually Randicapped $15,000 (°. intersections to ha equipped; currently includes: (a) Main St. @ Florida (c) Goldermest @ Warner (b) Brookhurst @ Adxm (d) Warner @ Gothard *Indicates new project submitted to OCIC. FUA = SOURCE Ac=mt No. R 301, Unappronriated Fund Balance, in the amount of $71,842.00. �, d PIO 4/81 Yl' .a ). .idw {. ... ..w•..•'.f:.,...+.., ..... .....•. f.1..,... .. ... ;,. . n' ..... ..w .I. ..+t,•d•. - ..a'.v;.:r.t.,:.a...l.n.t....+wr+.+...r.w..+r.yfL.-j�. i a . I . •-•/•-•.y:*• _ — ,- a . ' .. ...q ...., :,+ ...-. .. .x .. .'V� _ trr'rrtit ��Q h C�xY Superior Court /co�Nc : nrtxts STATE OF CALIFORN[A .f In and for the Cotmty of Orange . sue---� - .�,�. �� •�t '^•. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHP CITY CLERK I wpRMF OF pUFi1.ICA .ON ......�.. PUBLIC HEARING, 1982'Edition State of Cali! - . County ot'Orange ) tr girt Rita J, Richter ' •I C � �t�rxrsr That I ism and stall times herein mentioned wsa a citizen of t the United States,over the agn of twenty-one yearn,and that I am not a party to,not interested In the above entitled matter JW OP w!A'rt p1 that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Nt1Att�f.•0¢ ZT HUNTINGTON BEACH'IM. REVIEW y itClu'newspaper of genera)circulation,published In'the City of ' y - HUNTINGTON BEACH Aw•`«tats►s�j Tear ' County of Orange and which newspaper=s published for,the disetnination of local news and intelligence of a general charm- ;lAfi ter;and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had t1ow:P and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, ttgs•itesf and which newspaper has been eetablIshed,printed and pub. °t "r 0�,�W� lished at regular intervals in the acid County of Orange for a Ive •period exceeding ono'year, that the notice. of which the ;.A '"� •�yt`�r :� . annexed Is a priated copy,has been published In the regular re tlrr ' .us and entiie&sue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement elsM�leS ' thereof,on the following dates,to wit; or'F ' February 23, 19844�►' ,. (r tX ttA; I certify(or declare)wider penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is tree and correct. Dated at............Garden.Grove.................. Califo ;1A.Awhils ...r..dayofFebruarj6�....` -#Zita J. Richter .fir. ................................ Sisnature Furri No.POP 8c082 AtY:•i.MMw.'�.w-'.NfhVllialt+'scow.+.w.+aw.•,•.r...6:Fa•.x.www.trw�•�v...wv...e tW f:`M.Y.«..::::. F..'./..•e-.+r+:•-.:......w...........�tl.r.�s rY.-.a..'wt4.'.'l.f hl.Y:.IM�aN M+�M�w.w•.+•+Y`MIK' • , i NOTICE.OF PUBLIC HEARING (STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION — 1982 EDITION) . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Ciicy. Council of the City of Huntington Beacii, California, pripones •to adopt Ordinance No. 2684 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JHUNTINGTON BEACH AMNDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY 'ADDING THYMTO NEW CHAPTER '12.10 ENTITLED, "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION,`11982• EDITION." Notice in further given that a public hearing will be held upon said proPoaed `Qrdinance •i No. 2684 on the 5th day of March, 1984, in the Council Chamber, in the City hall of the ' �. City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, at the hour of 7:30' P.M.,_ or as soon .. thereafter as possible, at which time any and all persons interested may.rppear and be heard thereen. . • . a Notice is further given that at least thr-e copies of the . Standard Specxf;_ations For d Public .Works Construction,' 1982 Edition" are on file with 'the City. Clerk .)f the City of ' Huntington leach, and are open to public inspection and'to Fhich reference is:made for. ', 'further particulars. ; , A copy of proposed Ordinance No. 2684 is on file i:: the (office of the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Deach, to which reference is made for further particulara. Doted this 22nd day of Februa , 1984. " rY r CITY OF HUNTINGTOU BEACH I OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Alicia 11. Wentworth, City Clerk `yet?i!+'.w.,su'env►r..r► .I•!Rr.W..w.w+.w.r+., .w.„..v.,vtiv...w.aw.ww.s.r....,..........r w1y..•,.u.s:rrr w-.....-...............:... .....++....r.uwa.w...�^.,..w..r.r+--•+.-- .—w•.....yr,•x REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION r Date Febtuary 9, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor .and City Council Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administratbr �Cw prepared by Paul E. Cook,' Director of Public Wor}: 'Suy3 Amendment to Huntir:yton Municipal Code/Addition of New Chapter 12a0 AD Statement of,issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Fu,�ding Source,Aitemative Actions,Attachments: ' STATEMENT OFi`ISSUE:.. Muni#pil Code provisions. regarding the Public. Works vzpartinent do •not reflect ,the ,departinerit'n orc'anizational structure nor the duties, responsibilities or standards required for the safety, welfare and . protection of the public. RECOM.M.iNDATION: . . Adopt -t e attached ordinance amending the Huntington Heach Municipal_. Code .by,• adding. new Chapter 12:10 eirtitled, !'Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction "' 1982 edition. ANALYSIS The Department of Public Works has nearly completed. a lengthy.':oveigll study_of its,::a pp'lii:able codes which'.have been outdated',by, various. changes to the ,City, improved construction standards,':new safety hazards ;, within the public..areas, and by variations or extensions of legal " requirements or definitions. 4.F x.Code Adoption y ;ref- Ney7 C}ia ter 12Y:10 Public:Works Constructio b n':. erence. or tne--StandarZ Spec cat ons 51 Pu c ,Works.,Construction't, ' aka "Green H66k;,7 is requested for the purpose of providing citywide: e,4aitable; obaective,.,practical and standard specifications-,for all. public wor}rs :construction,projects.,., By 'use,of the- Green- Book,- admiriis- trative:'prace'dures, construction materials, methods, and requirements ' would be consistently applied and enforced within the City. Pursuant to the Government Code Section "50022.3, a public hearing shall be held. after the first reading of. this proposed ordinance. .FUNDING -SOURCE: N7A . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny the amendment. ATTACHMENT r , nance ` CWT:PEC:jy �Ip1/81 , �•" «lw"+�.Y1V4.?er.�•k:Ny.r:4y4::(n Alu:i: .:.e'.,•i'�:.i.....,....,1 ... ..4;:. ic?=fit .'•1.:.):,'v ... .�:v.>l:i:. :! : .`_,,; ...t,x.,r.....�.�F.j.-V l•�••"fi2s.7} 1%• t;.`,:• ..`:L -tom%: ��.'..y,:.•,.st.;.;t J .fl'vr:v.t.Mp..�"t'� c ' 1 , i =IfYT.YM• t'A\YlftiY)i� hipl flit*� / i�'3� � � �:S-7�Y jyr�,t �f;y�.� ...w.,T�.T.i• `,. �•'a ;�•t Y1yr�`,.+.,=7ut'' Aulhor6ed to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public itNIC�1 IfriTl�11 'C A1f a nolln,sa by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County. Map. TOI0tM California, Number A•6214, dated 29 September, 1961. and ; =1 A-24831.dated 11 June, 1963. 7, 0IT 141�:t�,`+,r� STATE OF CALIFORNIA !rnen. i.ThakWt Vol tfn�fone�+ctlit� !r County of Orange P.Drt NOULI AorwYq++p[orwW f i ,•;':` ` + 1+*'a 4Z�i� ; ' c:tl! S or,ref PK&� �dr„n r Pontk,12.114�Y�� ,i„° rt3tandasd tkwcHt�tfo+r<for;�u ark►r y f t �; ` .;:•l, ,.. eQitloti, I�. tAlfreif,, , S ��;� I am a Citizen of the i.irited States and a resident of } + the County aforesaid; I am over the ge of eighteen ,y,o Ahb' Y,;pf' 1+cijlcat(on+r rrb �y Ind � _ to:r years, and not a party to or Interested in the below t aYirnment taadei .tfort T t � ,,.>. _ . .. . inp J��t,'.fgtlltabSA'I� l�: �;. di' entitled inatter. I am a principal cleric of tha'Orange oelwrM�rtierabsili a ; Coast'DAiLY PILOT with which Is combined the mrtsrlata�''calKsuctk�ti�j>jib , - ' est&W��for alf pptU{thf0�YOrir1: 1dW'�1r7! 'pfj Iichtdiy�1aj111it>)kea. 'Lt IIM be*_ NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of e'rieral circulation, � 9 'tieaGh.r.�•;.u`„•�fi.hr.,..n t•„.h, . .!�t ta #Primed 'nd published in the City of Costa Mesa '�+�•..� Y,s.tk rl,�.,:^�Y�'•i� �X_+,4 �.f, ; � . ��.tta.oa�Adnmf�rrett�i.')'nvsa'�cs.�at�uwta County of Orange, State of California, and that a doyAppointe�fupresantativtatfer,+bywtf".6ttic� Mr �M1r ed�S� ` io• ! }� }t rdepeet6l. .wrtnf*from3ko4Noticoof Ordinance No. 2684 .►eiti+�+, , r CITY gV 11Uti-TI?jGTOt7- BEACH `' • F� 'rhil��trarrniQt►s.t SprJ t�r� ' _ 'CatlOilti.tOQrl!r+K 1 ,1��. • 1dp ritMiderd JIN1fi r7f ti`M '.� . - �afpuq.o�rrofit�:eidq?3ed.gYr •q�.4itV• •� at. of which copy attached'hereto is a true and complete t!<t>!f rd'ip+cli>�itiona�oNw'bppt ,. �. !bq gpinitsn,ef th4 dirppt6rrf10 Wct*} copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mosa, ,'lufte,�i�1'ticth' ', '{Ri}pZ&r ! `YI` „") ; "ttrt ..eret watfers cd ': ,0 New c Beach Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Y,ot. , -� ' r P rt gt c , a ey, �t�tZTflg�sa��aat3l,itl�rd, �' tttintt if{e sen+e t$eateflnp i otdh i+ Iriins, the Sot.th Coast comrnunitias and La una - -sot : • g Nh �t Code fa1i� �s�pp�, t iZt4a e one bi tbnxtrdediaa rbol etd ci<►. "� Beach Issues of said stews a er for !�,,: consec:-+itive weeks to wit the Issue(s)of � ItYKIp"t>�' i aCb or,p".,, }.. r OI n�ItC#�F) mY/.fd:,'.of,of, A.Unc?t+ W9nM;by,,tIM.1�,1 � �r �c�nP 1+n [urf`stiotlor�, iffiits Fot�$Rrl ltOs" ,#tlidiltrV 'af;th4 reinNAitg�oRlortl., tills'�ii � �� ' ?98 At.d oc�tle'0Y1f,}�litUfarArd WRb March 16 4 tln qd . � t.Pfi h'at.lh�n�t • ;�liij� �� . t99 dkl'°r'srea 'Id at t liu r ;b dltCTlONih(�"ordlr4�+�d:bh#tf'1� 7 141M °I& pr. i98 �! P�s�ro;Mt9`600c�€+a by,'1ir.01r�l�a • 'HUnti tanl,�adc, pi�r�}+(er.n'w�ttng ltrri+i� „t iy;OtlfesCii.`,184:>3',4'vl. a' iIN i 1913 it•..•.. it.'tee.^�itiiix•.'r� ttr`.'�?v: r. •cxc ,y A t{ ' iliii,'t'f.',i.• 6A.V �, Ki;'yl r rj�.^`F S;•;'''s. .f i r y + ,•' TTI"!!?«, rtii 1 i if�' .Zi"r e.+�' 'lslAacfa M�1M1tan "rttir`v itt�t• ��;.',�'�„r�° ��j�� "'�� 199 a�r 1`FerfcY u 1•.4 »-r{.,;..� , .i��' ��':. COMP 4FCRANQSi;t, et r'r�.; .� ' � ,• r�r i� CITY,<a ��}tuft�raraFl declare' untlor enalt of er u that the �" �' � s 1�' i►r ' t,} d5+``' P Y p 1 rYi �:t; �c C M.:�'J 7W ,:dohs:. ». foregoing i3 truss and correct. tater�oitrlact at.lilln od.0#eefl'a.o�`��I t1n0 k ��od:sttl tild.tifil :, Ilty,� n.tkerelyr;testi� a�'�I} !°}ir LC urnbef of t{1r t!t tI ty. ntU of ttet:('•it� 1111n�tm 4 4 00 W of fast��ggSr{► rcti�`i�lombti 14 rl iCCh 16 4 CIty,G4trrcil aCl{iwMpu; trtaelirtg "alit d afi r►��t o:rw E EX@Clltf)d on , 198 ..._ ahivahi,tea�{;?ir2d, >itgte0:f'►b`t d�Gtty; . +y14o at Costa Mesa, Califo nia. i+ Duet'»at! f.f►+ bn,tli•�,rddbt1rro+t� yvaspaisbd.imd.�dopt��.Eh6.�illrmstl+ro,W dcr, AZ ashy, 's0 the hlegt or.OAIdMUC�otutic :c� Sig nature � cluna� N+;; 'I �r}hfi�My :� ;ti' • r ff{At35� 1 Ccun .y'r( �.. s,,�.�'3,„i„�,��'-tx1"�,�j��'••1'r.�:��.`clt' n4.'a�' �'af�.�� i,�.r:sj;�t ',1 �:sii;•., :,t+ �oi1f ttngf }fita ia `� t?i,bg�tic�Qrsngq C11eif Dergy�FKitit iir-.t►,1 r�! ;. ?,,+y t{�1_�s,. ;t., .y�!i;i:i .,�1YlFti:, 7 k1;'.c�+�i.i,�1� r !f ,'• 1'.i,'•1:�r'ti� *u,;y� .yt:. Citil'„ -. .�.,, h,y. r �.: �,�;:, .+....�rt•s+we . 'D!� �� ' ��`/'li.'�',';�.t.,f');'.;;rt�' �;=Y�;1':1rZf�.i" � _ r' l.. ..1. .Ti:R.,i.�w.Mw.r,• �l-::.:�.1:, .•. _.inn, �,r. �;; j�, yy y 1' r� n r •^j(/.,::rj. ..,. ,... `-` .r. .,_��.�;. ��-";i'•:...i.�'t••'.'r-�tii.`IS4�rrw:Y.. 1, t� � , � ! .ire; ' 31/ •4r� � „ r • . ,� /s/8y �oa,� G�i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Submitted to: fk=rc-ble ?Mayor and City Council .. / �,��v z;D uY l Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administi-ato .� C � Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Fist Saxment of Arlen rants to Municipal Codes Regardin5 �`�•,5�. �y Public t brks Department Statimentof•Issue;Apconrmendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachment=: t STA76iQWIM ISSUE: 1. c pal provisions regarding the Public Works_repartrent do not reflect the department's organizational structure nor the duties, responsihili.ties or standards required for the safety, welfare and protection of the public. 2. This`•packe of,amend-ants to 'the Municipal'Ccrde. ooveri ng.various and relatively short subjects his.the first of a series to.be..sulriitted for Council action as a result of an encoapassing study of codes relating to the department and its present:operat:ional position, standards and requirements. RBOMENDATICN: K*E t • attached ordinances updating the construction standards, nmienclature, safety requis errents, definitions and methods of operatiorr as rEvpired of the depart rrent. ANALYSIS: pep rtment of Public Works has nearly ccapleted a lengthy overall 'study of.its applicable codes witch have been outdated by various changes to the'City, improved . construction standards, new safety hazards within the public areas, and by variations or extensions of legal requirements or definitions. NeW3.Code"'C ter 12.10-Public 1460 C6nstruc="i Adopti by ' }:on� reference of �uhe Standard specifications,of Public Wori•.s Constrict on, AK "Green Book," i`s requested for the purpose of providing'city-wi.de equitable, objective, practical ard"standard specifica- tions for all* public wofes construction project•:.s. By use of the Green Book,.acbdhistra I Live procedures,, construction materials, methods and req+ reiy�_-hts'wt7uld be consistently applied aryl enforceci.wi.thin ;the City. Pursuant to the Govt'xnnent Code section 50022.3, a public1. hearing shall be'held�after the first reading of this proposed ordinance. Amended Section`13:241.0 - Coristriiction Permit,Fees: This amendment allows the perm><t ee for private face ita.es to es Miss resolution of.the City Council. The fee w=1d be based upon valuation of construction and in line with the already adopted Uniform Administrative Code of the International Conference of Building Officials, as found in Title 17 of the Code. 1lmended Section- 3.08.070 - Master Planned Drainage Facilities Fund: This arr►mdsrrent i p r� des or accurate reference to the Master plan of DraMFe_ r the City. Amended Section a.17.010 `Obstruction of Sidewalks and Streets: The amendment to 8. .010 a) nakes mrnor changes ut order to c ar>.fy Me 3rig-inal. intent to prevent natural growth from interference or obstruction with free passage of pedestrian or vehicle' t fiffic. . Paragraph 8.17.010(b) clews any vegetation, regardless of. height, 'IS creating an interference or obstacle to traffic unless such vegetation is cut to meet the three (3) subsequent rnnditions. NO arrir Jo;�,::!:�,;.1•.;G.`++',ir.iw+.T..l a.. .?s. .. ..... . .!:...tt .. -y. ... . ,-,. . .... .... ....'CJ..... .., -.N as._.:,V:'�'.r` , �.. .. .. p;...._.,.r' .r.- ��,ri! , W ,,�f..:i+t�.t2:1:irY i.:,ry'.•�,Pi.ri'•:.:.l�5.'t;Y, • Request for Council Action Amendments to Municipal Codes Decenber 6, 1983 Page 2 ,. . . .. •:: Rei. a.w ,i• - � ..;,a Arr.ncle�'S�ct'3a�sY 8 20.010•and 0'60:relki K to iofuse collectioiii: The wwnd mt to 6.0 0 1 exc es a mo �.le par��ae x `t n of:"uu�it-of 91-MM�." ;l)e:amendment to 8.20.060(b), provides'for the same maximum tkYe.lIi&t'for removal of.the.:xefuse.container on the day of;eollection,'yet,deletes tlx^ confusing "2 hour statement followed itmediately by an excerption thereto. }; Amxyded r +St3 Cis 344.2ti 0 h'3.44 280:%relatino<<Eee .�uid is "s`.for line. - �esethrae atmid n existing,cr p� a or changes to ,fees and-`+Tarr es by resolution of the City Council in'place of .the process;by. action.of an ordinance. .The attached fee schedule resolution presents the sate fees and charges as found in'the present code. Aniencled,Sections 8.16.O1Q :}.arid g ]6.03d reUitiml to,Wed abatifnrit: This amend- meet provides for the removal of weeds creating a •fie mA ce :EU,Ir6ther' I mrable material" endangering the public safety; ;".Tt shortens 8.,16.030 bl. reference to all . such,wec 3n place ;of repeating the'lengthy description of 'susihnct weeds or; material.,;,-.Tlvse'changes correspond to the.destwiption of nuisancae weeds as found in Resolition No. 5233, adopted Feb. 32,• 1923. F[1hLiItJC'''StXTRCF': • No ada'Mna` l An diiig 'is required. A15EFdJtME AMCN: 1. Deny,Mg raM=t:s in total.` 2. Approve selected amendments and deny all others. : A Ne ao .meter IL 10: Public,forks tbtist ruction 2. -Awjx ed Se6U6n.13'24.020 -, re- mit'Fees 3. Amended Section 3.08.070.- Master, Plarmedtrainage Facilities'Ftimd 4. r Amended Seection 'S.17.410, --.Obstruction of 5idesra.1Y.s and Streets Am ' SMended Sa�ticns 8.20.010 and .060 relating to:refuse collection 6. Amended Sections 3.44.260 through 3.44.280 relating to fee and dzarges for •pipeline+ franchises !' 7. Awanded Sections S.16.010 and 8.16.030 m].ating to weed abatement G.n:PDG:W9:jy 44i3 ....+r++..+..w+.�.w.wr.-raw.u..w'...:CJ...',-�1. i.'.;a�..,r...:.i:L.et.?......,��rv.. .a .•. ...v'.r,».+F:a.,.:...�wa-.r+:.+.,ru:il.ar. iru�.,r o.. .•w.fi:its�j% . ' ti i Superior Court OFT" STt.TEOF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Otsnge n( l� CITY .OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MQQFOFPUBIICATION_ CITY CLERK ORDINANCE MO. 2671 AN AWAP& n3nt 9 StateorCalifornta ) :,,.js MI;JB Y,t)IYEMf Y CountyofOrange )ss y ;%is t�,ydgi,C*dIli/.`w�R�y(. H OI'1'h'E APRIL L. ELLIOTT :sated. ik 9.1" H N 11F.At Tbst I amand at all tittles herein mentioned was a citizen of :.F By)AL01lrti tia3� the United$told,over the age of tpenty one yeah,and that I t�eid am not a party to,nor Interested In the above entitled matter, that I am the principal clot k or the printer of the f, �,7t� �� 44 , { !�•*' wit 9mwt,d HUNTINGTON' BEACH' IND.' RFCVIFW ,'•`.�: ort+a+oe of a newspaper of general circulation,published in the ity or tlsts t t rrl irA psn�ss{ HUNTINGTON BEACH County of Orange end wl►Ich newspaper IS published for the f�tr4�. "Noce .p�? diseininstion of focal news and intelligence of a general eharac } r,.d;� DoW art ter,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had <`:`..nf�1r[tiroadefs}r pulSpsYpK� and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subsaibrrt, , and nbich newspaper has been established,printed and pub- itc.•tr. ar■tors V fished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange forau[tta�litr+ellt se is;,;. edtwatramdsiti» arind exceedingnaa: car that•tha notice. of w bleb the , , •, r: :-_;x .•,;i�j�� n nexed Is r printed Copy,has been published In the rtgulut"= �.trad ' and entire issue of said newapsper,and rot in any cupplement f N►riUN' ' r:;};. dUw�otyprtt�;T.s.•;!�F'k's' thereof,on the following dates,to wit: •.�, i.QL gadrxrtit Y/3':�' •.r3 S'• JANUARY 1Q r 1984 Ply. ". k. t•� I csrtify(or declare)under petWty of Ferjury that the forego- Ing Is true and correct.- . ' wedat.....GARDEN,GROVE ,,,,,,; Calf= 20thd yo..JAN.,19...0.4.. ... .. . . 0................... / Signature y- Form No.POP 82082 y .! 1."�t.L a.:i.�.i u.[..,{i hn.i. _. •.• .+... l.1♦ .. . ..�.. l ... ...... ..e.. .... .i...r.. ..A.:. l...Liar.. iw•1v. :./�Y'{W'L7••M r.N1a.�/.�/^.yw.w�f,.��„ e 1 z OR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION REQUEST Ft Date �r 6, Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Cotmcil T . s r. vY,U. gar Submitted by: C. W. Thmpscnn, city Adminis a APp� 1 ••1(,' 1 Prepared by: Paul E. , Director of Rt'aIic hbrks � Tx Sub1 Firrst segment of its to Municipal' �L — ` Statement of.! ua,R �" + ! sis Funding Source,Aitemative Act STA'I MENT"OF.ISSUE: 1. �--- Provi-lions regarding . . , th ' Pariznunt's organizational the Public hbrks Depr,1rt3mnt do.not reflect rganizational stxacture nor the duties, respvnaibilities or standailds requ3n-4 for the safety, uralfare and Protection of the public. 2. This"p-ac}cage of its to the Municipal Cbde bover ng various-and"relatively short subverts is tip first of.a series to be subldtted for Cxuncil Lction as a result of an enompassing study of codes relating to the : . depaxtrtent and present Operational position, standards and tents. its 1 Dvt c't Ched ordLn0170=Itijihe Ooarstruction s t�andaxdsf naw=lature, _safety r'eTJire=ts, definithods of operation as required of the de�art- Rent. ANALYSYs: t of Public htorks has pearl` app7.icahle codes Y cotTleted a lengthy ovierall.study of its =j �ds have been outdated by.'yailo-w changes,to,the City, ii rm-ed or extensions of ' new safety hazards within the public areas, and by variations Jam- requirenents of definitions. ,- Cbnsl 7 w ►R-%v N ifrl i/�`YY#.iti � Nafi�1{.: ': -.. - t .. -... Spec 1•catiOns O - PtiuGriplo3 sefU._or__ - { 'O•l equiyta-�bleeGt ;• r eferen mot t,_.b e..S tandar d sbe r � 1. a .afpzcv � _au- a at rd s�ifica- applle�i ar 9'enforcad'wittiiii-tlie.Ci _.___,.�.. . erents administra- tive _WMof-theor i n BOOkr�thods and reriux would be oonsisteiitly a ty rt�uant.to the d veiix�t bodesectiori'50022.3, public hearing shall be-held;afte "the first Am 6d"Section-13 i 24.020 - _ of this � oxdifia i e. sctioti Permit Fees: This amend+rent allcwi the penrtit fee Rar p vate to be e fee would'be bared upmn valuation of i� resolution of.the Ci.ty�Council. , adopted Uniform Administrative Code of the InternationalConference of BuilnX+Aon and in line with the ding Officials,Officials, as found in Title 17 of the Code. Amended Secticin 3:08.070 - Master Planned bra a Facilities Fund: provides his amAxicfi�ent or accurate re erer to Master P t of Drainage for the City. Sectrfon 8.17010 -- Obgtxvction'of'Sidewalks and Streets: The amendment to .010 a iMws In o natural growth from interference or, Obstruction with free-passageintent to prevent vehiclrj traffic. 010(b) deems an on Of pedestrian.or Paragraph Bull. y vegetation as creating an interference or obstacI,e to t regaxdless of might, meet the three (3) sub ..raf£ic unless_such,vegetggM is cut t-A Sequent conditions. - P+0 4184 1 •y. i.'.i. ,L.a....aa LIYr '... tea...: '1 .-. .. .., e J 1� Rest: for Council Pction Anwnd efits to Municipal Codes December 61 1983 Page 2 S'20:OlU-and':.06U rP1a + to ; fuse cn1lecti oh: The ant to.8. 0. 1 1 excli0eg a e de of ,"unit of seru ice." q'amendment to 820.060(b) provides far the same maxisunan time limit for removal of .the refuse container cn tha day,of collection, yet.deletes the confusing "2 hour" statement follcraed immediately by an exception thereto. Sections 3.i44. th�3.44.280 ielating'to`fee.and'charc�es for•PiPa- • set1unee menus to.the.existing:code provide for changes to Wes an�arges;by resolution."of..the diy�r.il in place 'of the process by action of an ordinances. The* attached fee schedule resolution presents tha same fees and ctmrges as found in the present code. , Amend Sect Sons 8 16:0I0 'aiirl 8:16 030 �rk l i .to weed.abata mt: This,61=d- menu provides,for,the removal of weeds creating a fire menace". er Toth flammable material" angering the public safety, .,it shortens 8.16.030'by reference to'all such wwds in place-e,of repeating the lengthy.description c f'suspect: weeds or material... These cbmiges correspond to the description of nuisance weeds as found in Re-wLition No. 5233, adopted Feb. 22, 1983. FUND=.SCURCE:, Nof1Y'33ng ,is r6qu3.red. ALLTErguam ALMa4: . . Tay EIZ 59animts in total. 2. Approve selected amendments and deny all others. ATTACHMENTS C% ChWte; 12.10„ r PublicW rks,6aristruction ; 2. ,'Au6nded`Se6tion 13.24.020 -.•Conitrnuction Permit.Fees 3. Awersdecl. Section 3.08 '070 - Master Planned.Drainage Facilities,Fund 4. Amerided Section S.170010 - Obstri�' of Sidewalks and Streets 5. Amended'.Se EUM 8.20.'010 and .060 relating to refuse collection 6. kneri Sections:3.44.260'thiwjh 3.44.280 relating to fee and charges for pipeline franchises 7. Amended Sections 8.16.010 . and 8.16.030 relating to-weed abatanent c r..PDC:WB:3y ii .I .7!I�{('p'�:{a•4Y.•1u:.I'I�N•�%it:(r.�.i."r:T.d{i••.,.4F�L-v.'J+.�=..::f::!ll;:b•:...i•r�....fti.:. •. , .:.'1.:. .}tA:..•, .4.a . i+'.:.:.LN.Lw.•' .Y?fw 'isy'y"f..•j.�•,�y/•31X/f'NtT,f'R?YA�J.e:�fa11{ry'� ''I.i c: .t •+�.'.i•A-• +ti' air • . ... a� fir: . :• .. t\.fir .. HOxICE OF P B ARING ORDINANCE NO. '2671 (STAtRDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, proposes to adopt Ordinance Ito. 2671 entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH Ml@ICIPAL ODDS BY AUDING•WHERETO NEW CHAPTER' 12.10"ENTITl.CD, "PUBLIC. MAKS CONSTRUCTION." Notice io further given that a public hearing will be held upon said proposed Ordinance No. 2671 on the .6th day of FMWVAAy 1984, in the Council' Chamber, in the City Hall of the City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, at the hour of 7.30 P.H., or as soon thereafter as possible, at which tim any and ell persons interested stay appear and be heard thereon. *Notice is further given that at least three copies of the "Standard Specifications For Public Works Construction, 076 Edition" are on file with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and are open to public 'Inspection and to which referchce is wade for further particalara. A copy of proposed Ordinance No. 2671 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. of the City of Huntington Beach, to which reference is made for further particulars. . .S. Dated this 'rj4h 'S�►Nv�'� �19�3 f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f Office of the City Clerk Alicia H. Nsntworth, City Clerk rr'.:".1(i4S".��7:.�.t14Sc�-..'w:fi.ait:wAi CiiL.r:.e/J:c.,.'.w••a,nV-.w.r a,....,a...w....,-..aaw .�.<... e. ..w.<.a,.a...... ...�..�....«.......�.....Y.,.....-.,...+.�.w•-...«�.....+...r�..+ww..wMi is r 4 NOTICE: OF PUBLIC HEARING 1� y (STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, propnses to adopt Ordinance No. 2671 eh t tied "All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BRACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON B r-H HUNtCIPAL CODE ADDING TH3R9T0 NEiT .IE►PTER 12,10 ENTI � "PUBLIC TIORKS CONSTRUCTION." Notice is further given that a public hear11- -y, will be held u on said proposed Ordinance No. '2671 on the 16th dayof Janu1984 in t e Council' Ch=ber, , , in the City Hall of the City of Huntington Beach, 200D . sin Street, at the ; hour of 7:30 P.H., or as soon thereafter a possible at which time any and ell. persons interested may appear and be h and th eun. Notice is further given that at least three o es of the "Standard Specifications For Public Works Construction 1976 Edition" are on fire with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington B ach, and are open to public inspection and to which roferahce is mad for fu her particulars. A copy of 1roposed Ordinance Ito. 2671 a on file in t Office of the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Ileac to which referenc 'o made for.further particulars. Dated this f4th day of December, 19f83. CITY OF HUNTING= BEACH Office of the City Clerk Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk f r'hfw:'��i��f,.��.•.;;i}ilS.•�:ialf:l•:r1':i'.,,. .....i.�.M'.�.;.,tif!xi.,,ti;...r_.(.. 1.1 .--w.,.+..t1..:',:t..r....,. «,i•s.a...a',rn.... r�.�wc.rir..a.Y...l+i-t`t:i'.if2.a1JT Ali t•�M�F:.'rL+��'a�2 tK„rtt I I Superior Court CWWM STATE OF CALL MIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK r ARING State of Californis. ) .. County of 0ranXe ) or v�Y APRI L L.. ELLIOTT sdrt ,That I'am and at all times herein mentioned wsa a cidun of ?aha Af r the Uaited States,Gust the age of twenty-one years,and that I � am not a PRAY to,nor interested In the above entitled matter; that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the AA TI G BE CH:'I HUN TON A D. 'N N REVIEYI ., •Haws r of e»erR1 arculatio uhliahed la the Cit of ` w f` HUNTINGTON :BEACH County of Oringi and which uwipsper is publuhed fo the y diiemination of local news and Joteluge6ce of a general ter,rind'which newspaper at all times herein men had 1.1ita and still hiis a boca ride subscription list of paying su ben,. sad which newspaper has been established,printed pub. ° ' liahed at regular.intervals In the grid Cocinty of O go fors pariod•esaedinS,orie year;-that the notice, o which the �y1 wmtzed Is a printed CYN ai la, P SPY,hsa been published the regular and entire isiue of said newspaper,and not In supplement .•'r'Gr . tharsof,6n the following dates,to wit: 5;ffy._�. c JANUARY S, 198 4 + `� '� � ' I certify(oi declare)under of perjury that the forego- is true rect 10DEN GR y Dated at.........:...... . ...................... Califorcia,t ...5ib. o[,lAN.�...19..rB�.. .... ... .................... i. Signaturo �:i J Form No.POP 92082 ` .'.^"rnr+z.�.rih,::i.i�4'�:`F.4/cww+e...•.+.+.«.....,...r....�.,.,..�...._.._.....�.«.........«w.:r:..•.:;;.....,.,..........+...........�,..�._.... ..._...._.. .....+++---•�....-+,...w. rrsi�,'`I .. trr7j0i- i y 3 C1N/fdAra' /rFWJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAFZH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92M- Paul E'Cook Public Works Department Director (714) 536.5431 May 17, 1983 Carl; Nelson Director of Public Works 'County.:of; Orange" Environmental Management Agency P.."" 0. "Box 4048 1, Santa Ana, CA 92702 Dear `Carl: I am sending you the: attached letter for your information. V a ,very,concerned that tYie attitude of the State F3 sh".:&,'Game Deot. regardC" ��.the"preservation,,o`f wetlands ,is.:baginriing. to 'take "a' higher u" prior`i.ty'.than':tlie. pr�'servation. of: the healthyand "safety"of.;.re"sidents -„ adjacent t ' ;substandard -.flood control channels: .'For.`example;-we.:have received•:word'. from. the ;Coastal..Cominission ,,that't1ie. City w3.11, be re- quire.d to"-provide onei:'ind one.quarter -acres of wetlands in of: Beach".-Blvd, .and: Pacific Coast;..Highwiy.':in exchange'''for the;.approval •.'of."ouk.,project.,""iro.,'con'struct: concrete."lining of the Slater.: Channel from the' Winter"sburg "Channel to "SpringdaJ.e Street: As: you, know," the area. requirbd„ for wetlands 1s' about 5 miles from the Slater Channel lining project. It is'"6bvious ^...that 'E.Mi A, is going: to face a,."simi:lar ""but larger: 'rob-, lem when. it ;comes:'time: to' improve .the tidally infZuenced Fountain •Valley, -Huntington Beach and Talbert. Channel's. I..will keep you informed 'regarding the,:Coastal f Commission heari.nq'on the" Slater 'Channel 1'ining project. .The. City..'intends to .v ' elieieeritly. .,... _ . oppose the'.'requirement for dedication of wetlands in :conjuncti.onawith this project. We hope that the County will take a timilar stand. Please •call me if you wish to discuss' this matter. y truly"yours, Paul. E. Cook 'Director of Public Works PEC:ji, Attach. cc: .C. Thompson Les Evans Murray Storm �'fr'•' ;,..,. ..-i .• uMr+...wr....�-.�—�.-.......�wrrwuw.:.,w...,.c',li y :..rH..rv�..�. " �wr.r ^^.._...� JR PHILLIPS COMPANY >tnc 17 Ruuebudl Centre 1590 SoUh Coast Highway Loguno Beoch, Ca4tornio 92651 (744) 494.8071 April 15, 1983 Dear Residant of Huntington By Thu Suit Re: The rvecht, storm and possibI6 future flooding and damage to your mobs lehoina. During; laic storm and concurrctit hibh, tides that occured March ,lst, the two pumps, that- remove the water from'• our park performed very -well.- Unfortuiiatly, the levees of .the flood, control: chanael- in.-thes' area" behind the shopping .cef'tbr..south of Atlanta and' east'"of Beach Blvd..., , were, breached by;jhe .high level ,of. water in'.the:cliiii�nel,' . Water from the channel poured onto the "vacant. land to the: west of;' our. park (owne'd by, 1lills Land: and Water- Company) .:and %Oien th t section became'-;full, it overflowed into Iiuntington by the: Sea in. the viciriity':oft the.:car. wash. . As you are all ,well ;aware, it was 'a much greater quantity of water .than our pumps could handle and .caused,the flooding in our -park. Our pumps were' designed arid:engi.nc6r,e' d . to, handle all. the patent3hl.water in our park, not the additional water that comes from other areas. That afternoon the Huntington Beach'Fire Department. inspected the park-and deiermined .thit a 'potential haua.rd'.existed-and ordered 'the utilities turned off and.-the park_, evacsiazed,.as. a precaution i ary 'measure. Certiinly:we can all magihio. what a frightening experience it would hav'e been to have.had .to evacuate a flooded' park in the middle of the night 1 By' the following:,day the levees had been 'rep aiidd'by' the,Oran County Flood Control workers-'and the water pumped";out..and.we - could: return :to''the, park.;.,.:Only the skirting on;`some:'ot;":our" ` park; residences were. damaged but fortunately to. our'knowledge. no. water.'Got-:into any of. the homes to cause greater .damage. �. (Not so fortunate were. people in. the Del filar and Brookfield Manor parks where, because of a similar problem, many homes suffered extensive damage. ) It has come .to our,.attention• since-the flooding that the. California: Department: of, Fish and Game, has -issued a Final .' Report:.advocating�ttiat:+'u�.hole be put :into the flood. control` charinelI.!(which-would have' the-same effect as$a brokew- levee) so as::to create'."ti al!flushing"°of.the Mills property and turn tint land into a permanent "wetlands". The report also states that "a new levee of minor height may be needed to 'protect the .NW corner of the Mobilehome Park." This would seem like a totally inadequate solution to the potential problem. r Page -2- Re: Storm damage: We'.at. the J. R., Phillips Company do not'.take any position .with regard to the "wetlands" issue, but we do place,, a high 11•riority on- the safety of our park, . our Residents and their,.pl.operty. {ye`are .very•concerned as to what could happen when we. again: have high .tides and/or '�seavy,' siorms because. if there were any kind of:,an opening:.in the channel we. woul ,be continuously w expos .0" to. flooding. For: thug°reason the are against an' .'such'. r a py n an rm �tpropo y - any future ng of d possible damage,'to, your: h er wtsocit .;council erson aio,ut r. 't'o � i u our-co ncern. an-d :a to atten n public meetings re ar n this,-'- issue and to express -your opinions. The .Huntington Beach.Fire,;`and Police Departments• as;_well'-as .the Orange County;;Flood Control personnel are -to- be congratulated fora their quick 'response and actions'.to contain a very threatening ` situtttion: Personttlly r�I wouldd also like. to. trank and 'cammend Jean; and Elmer Eaves for, starting-;an esirly, evacuation :of. oux�'park. ; Elmer,-went; door to`;door, and Jean phoned-many'.. the residents t6. alert• them as to,`the'.'possible flooding' and 'suggest.ed that they proceed to. tho clubhouse as .a precaution. This was done several yours befom• . the park was -officially ordered to be•,'evacuated. Also, I would like. to-.thank• each one of you for .evac' usiting,, the park;,to such a calm and orderly manner when ordered to do .so by the city. , 4 'Sincerely. II ' Aft, z ohn' R Phillips ntreside . , _. '.;.,< --�, ::,M::�.w... ,�:..•': t tz >. .Y,..,r,'-...., .. ... fir• mow•.—�----_ - _..�"�..,,s_x..a.iatu..i.::+�-s r:w.,,:'a�icwww.�..-- r. .. • k j Su �47 P/_1 it/ r REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date October 29, 1982 Submitted to: honorable Mayor and City Council ORD 9 S11 771ib'aAoca o 11-1 S-94 - Submirted`by: C. W. Onvpsm, city Administra i 7k s nq3 ADojqen it-ts-8a Prep&W'by: Pa.a E. Cook, Director of Public llorks��c Subject: Ammdamt to Mmicipal. OxIe Regarding the Public WojJcg Dept. and Resolution s Establishing a Fee for Processing Requests for Vacation of EaEeiTents ORD. ..•SwWman' 3f 1isuo 'Rwomnwdntion,Analysis, Funding Source;Alwnadve Actions,Attachments: . sTATEMMU a IS=: 1. FUM Z, -WW a&dinist~rative p;oW.sions.for"the Public hbrks Dept: have not been UP-- dated tor'nearly 20 years,and do silt reflect the'duties, responsibilities'or general organization of,the cent as it now exists. 2. Aaeently a substanti al. incr asE3:'jn the nwnber of requests, for'vacation of emits_.. . has greatly affected costs,to:the depart due to.the ccupiwdty of P s#g such requests frum Individual property akmers and/or developers. Nb fee.cha ges are presently,,esL-ablisl fac these services and out-of-pocket ems. . Approve revised Chapter 2.56 updating objectives and iet,-'s+, ;ties'of the Public works Dept. 2. Adopt.the attad-ed res oiutian establishing fees for processing easeamt vacation requests. 't ie`r qi t of Pub].i+a WAS is'.presently rev!sing relevant portions'of.the M mi6ipal.. ' t7o in ifest itis`present position which has resulted from years of comes.tic? t City, the *Partin�t and their tional xela{'� s. Al 'x:thew-revisions were.' 'to be processed"through City C16m i d, as a.cznplete`package; :the immdi ate need'too establish fees for tP,e.seivices'at issue gxv� rise.to this.o nc reluest,for:Oauncil.action' tar both'..the . authadttf.to dharW for such services by the enabling ordinwxe of Section 2.56:050 r and the at=i wW1ng'fee resolution establishing fees for such services. Aaquests for vacation of easements have increased ap x ximtely.three-fold during the Last year. Precise map locations, legal descriptions and thorough title reports are amxjg the items which are basic to the procedure. No fee is 'charged:currently for such se vixen and expanses of.the`department although it is estinnted that the average oast for processing vacation requests is'approximately $250. This does not incline direct costs to the City for autside services such as title reports or engineering consultants when necessary. The attached resolution will enable us to recoup t1 ese costs. RX40IM SOURCE: - The ttended action will result in increased revenues to the City. Aifl'tlRrtA9�-ACTICH: 1. Deny approval of Chapter 2.56 and tdr- acc=prn ying fee resolution which kould requ;ra the City to absorb. these des. NO 4/8$ 1 ♦, .. .1 '.t} ;::,."t.....A: .t. .i l....... ... .,.. Af.i.i..... .". f• .. ,- .. r.....�. ......_.........e_.__......».-......+�....-.�..-+...r-�rrrxil'�}.f�+wwhhA lr �7�:'llaalJbx+a•:+r!r^►e+'1+7.^.`n►u tiw�ca�rsYrrr.-,.v—r-...,+..a.^-e:>ti•,vr+.. «.+..T:i r,rs(., .'.y'-J: '�`t,^ .,=...f-� •l'r'Y:-.ry,y.yy,bit;:c..r.,•!.'p?%^."_"31;":x;M.!•I!"'"..N,::)',fi'Y,*JtYs.3`�'!�`."�7C *uopemA :juawsea fuqmmwd jo3 im3 a n4v4sv tjcr To Gw "z 'ZOS xar 7 AV o:; -4mmo nd.uoRn;asaax wj oq4 a%=Ue Puv 95`4 x.-qdM p Tm=ckle Auaa. '£ tuw.xdde pUL s�su�dxa OSW4 WOBW cn•AITJ act Tte Agway; lcno r►josax sag aqq 3o T C[ 'Z z lea Z86t `6Z laQD400 qxD TedTaMj o4 :;uaWmW NpI.= 97ONf W.*do J� r i CITY OF HUNT1111CTON BEACH i INTER•DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION IttlrwlTYIGTDN�tt+CN • To Charles Fl.. Thompson From Robert C. Sangster i` City Administrator Deputy City Attorney Subject Professional Services Date November 15, 1982 Ordinance — Agenda Item K--2a. Attached is a revised page in the Professional-'Services Ordinance adding a subparagraph (e) to §3.03.060. R08ERT 'C. SANGSTER .Deputy City Attorney RCS:kdl cc: Alicia Vlentworth, City Clerk • is �iii•w+IPA;dl.it.wYl:l7'�+�"as+.....rwr.wrw.w.ax►w•.+t w.►.+..... ..:.ai.a:.;►,,.:.:wi..jr:r,:t C.::.2•a.::...fr:.:.. wN.a..r�..iiµ•+.+,x.:TL7W:►saw+rw+�,+1y.'►.w;J1;13WF.f:7^R+YRf {Cft`� €cam-a#tk�ee-€#runs-ee�avd#fl,�-tge..peApvsed-{�ee�eet� (eb) Except in extraordinary circumstances, the director, or ,hia designee, shall ebta#nrequest informal written proposals from thenot Zess than three (3) available qualified consultants. He ahall thereafter conduct discussions with them regarding the R project if such discussions are indicated by the complexity of the project, and based upon the selection guidelines established in section 3.03.040 and the criteria established. by him, :alert the consultant from the respon ible ;)roposals submitted to Jim,, . , 3p-seder-e€--pee€eeeAee;.-Ae�-3�ess-than-three-43�-a€-kqe-P9H�H#�:aHts , deemed to be the most hi hiy qualified to provide the services i�e- nuired. au�3-st�bta#t-} #s-eeBer�r�eadat#eia-te-kl�e�e#ty.-eeupe##T-W�e�e l €ewes-tbaA-t#�pee-k3�-prepesa#s--are-eeee#veds-these-w###-be-submittea te-the-a#ty-s9URO-1#--In-t#ie-erdep-e€-pre€ePexiee,- " kd�--Wheee-#t-bas-been-estab##shee-that-��ie-seep#Ae-eaa-ap#y #�e-p:�av#�iwa--l�y-a-S#•gag#e-seaeee�-a-reperi�-a€-se�e}�-€#nd#t��s-Haa## �,,,t aeeei�paA�-tbe-eeee�e�a�}at#eta--te-tt�e-s�t�-eet�ne##� - '� --se#eet-she-e€-the'-eeaFu#tahfi-+�e . - �eeexa�eaded-w�i#aft-se#exit#eta-sk�a##-be-�basee-upea:.t}�e-B�;#ter#a-##sfigd • #�i=seed.#ea=3_A3r84A-and-#Astrt�ek-the--d#eee�tae-aad»tie--a#t;�-attc�eae;>; .r e-ne6e�#ate a-aeaeeaetua#-ageeement-w#tH-the-eeasa#taut-se.-p AAxea -a .. arid-aut}�Qe#se--tk�e-e#ty.-a#e�+k-a�tcl-�a;��e-tA-eseeHte-fife-€#Aa#=•a�rPer�ps�- (€c)• .`If the.procurement 'haa been budg"'etelt,. the-d# ecteil s#shed-b »tHe-a#t3�- tte�i�ey3-sla##-then-Ae&t#area contractual" - }� . ' .agreement ;'rihal Z be n'eyotiated-With the consultant se,-se#eeted nut,_ •,t sect. to -final approval as to form by the city attorney, and as .to -" cont, by the city administrator. aad-b -tt�e-a# 0. agrsement. ahatt be .a77 pproved by the city "council. (d) If .the prorurement has -not been budgeted, then ,the .direc tor,:shall pre are "for appropriation for the city •adminis- ' tirator to submit to the city council in the usual prescribed inanner. t ' The city -attorney shaZZ:'coui's Z and 'ctdvise".�citr o zc'zuZs itt the "implementation of this chapter. ff, �T , �r��--�tae-eeeste +-€ee-when-.tHe-see #ge6�are-pereeted:-s?�a## ' aeb�s t-a-eear4.deat#alY-we#tsea-eva#uat#ea3.-whlaeh-evalwatiea-s�ial-1-1a €##e�!-w#tl�-tbe-p re ia$#tag-a€€#ear;-a€-the- yea€©r�apee-ep-fibs-ee►�- ' sit#taat-.HpeA-t:�e-eet�p#et#ep-ep-tt�e-se��r�ee6--peeKeseds--wit#sh-e�a?!�a-- ,;.`- �#e�t�sHa##-ee-attached-tA-the_statemeAt-a€-qHa##•�#eat'#eas-aad-peg+-. .', . €e��a�ree-elata-setm#ttee-te-the-a#t�_by_tbe-oe�asK�tantT .• : 3•"03.090 Authorization by ekr#a€-a€-acli#i3#s ;;ate-see>s�. ►QF �'" city administrator. In the else of n emergency which requires the immediate retention of, a p1-u:,3s1onal consultant, the, city OGUNe##administrator may authorize the eb#e€-a€-ad►n#x#s#Pat#ve sePvloeedepartment director to secure by the open-market procedure, 3. W"•+'+'%'a+i/a:�:r 7.t':iK:C.SS'.Y:FIi31lM'i+.f.w.rytr,.r...wnt., i .4::^11 i. ,:)v.•, .. , ....c.%. ,, :e.p':.;.L:......:1,'•i.+i1.:w. `.Ir:•';:�.r;.T'•-�... ,..; ,t-, ..;. e r: I st. t , e 1 I ...i»,;. .;" fir! ,,! '�`�? �b..p °ti;!+SJ 'YI " ' .r7t'f: f� 1�iit � ').r,a 15 �r' tf t .; ,sa ; r?;'. i ttS�, �� ,1 � =: :�j fl .7 Y. + f t}• �. "i4".•,J t� .g4&, Y�t�c.7 ItpAr}.t';#1*1� i , 9# a' r 'lf, .y ?Y..'` i t r�} t.17 I�{•.�• r Fi��n�SY •�tl��..��' �17�a.,. bJ��i •�tt ,r. �+4 ,tif.t !s� t• � '1�. qi "Y!�f �G 3�,A �,�t� . .fi t.t V. t �� `�:�k}r%.�"Tip';• .Yy,t,i�.:� , l.y �:f; t 7.. of,}µ' e { t,f.r `<CL t�► .n:Y:I' t �'' , •tf,;r: -o a �;� • ,r! ,r{y. },.r, 1'k )'( a .} -I fi y uS''.ti { U :lll i r'�, x,:y• :z'`Y ��"xt ?31t,a +15. 0 '�1j!�iaf' �, # •.��iri i.^.r{r, t l'3� E t:'`:�� 4 1'�... �,.�. .�SH' ,�.. •tt, C f•r��`` ti'..'"�"1`.3' �,k' +�y t.� rt i'{',�'',+° ��'t + �+ �' t� 7,' .$}" t,�� !i',a �`•,irj?�vr..� e. .,�� , t�.k d.,��'S' � �•�'«"��,! h •{, ;r.i+„ t,us. �iry �.�. t r J,* ��'a. �t .•t:.•.k,r, $, fi ,fi;. � tt. r1`,� J,rl�f t ` yr d `:,..• ., 7 't. :,}. �! t '.� ti ♦"�'` L, a•.% r:vq �. Y )�x r•� i *. t �p1.�� t ;a i` a•rp 1� � �' .•'��,•fl.•%f'_ ,�..,. r ��• t�`. .+ .�, .• �v , �. �; ,J S� � y_ " ��i`' ^h ✓ .� n " ' 3y';4.1:'' �a'k � � r�� ' it d�i�+r"� tFi�.'1 Cr''Jre ++?'.+� f (�:?J� ;.t4.� r, f f � '�� ,fit., r m��1.. �.�+ �. E; "'j,j!':�7t,;4� � �-�°�+t �� '�I. ��r•+;y`:i`��{'. � �ti:„�r .� i• ��+ Y��.•�^' N��,. .� i }!t �l �' +rys�. �.t�nr'y�� c��.•1�'�34f�!�ry'i��. ��•-:'l� Ut i'�1y��. �{ii.�.:f �)L!r >:Yl•� 1 `,f.�f�hr!7�c. ,° �;•t �.kty ;:C � _C Y�.,[�. r �"4.:, ir� Ma f �'r f.� l�s' ,S .tt � ��%�t t't ��:�'L.. c'�+ p ,(, 'tr ,tF•• .. '�l�i Y`�1 '.t:° �+ i {4 ir. c�.yi�� ; Lsle+ t�1t1 rtidi►� , - - - � •. � � + ��a�� • . REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIONRCS Date September 20,.1982— j Submitt+od : Honorable Mayor and City Council ZN��a�r.�E/� F3S LLB SuWttad by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 4 "1 h1l►]t ug i3 c r�' t,•t�U,�;+ tt, Prepared Ay: Jeri Chenelle, Administrative Assisi 'wbjects PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ORDIN CIxY C�,,_ Statement of Issue,Reaammendation,Anaiysh, Funding Source,Altematin Actions,Attschn eau: � STATtMEW OF ISSUE: Me Professional rvices Chapter in the Municipal Code is In need of extensive revision. RECOMh1ENDATION: pp ►`rove the attar ed'Ordinance. I 'ANALYSIS: Mr,Professional Services Ordinance has proved to,be very cumbersome, imposing many delays on' the,process necessary to hire consultants. Following are the major changes made in the ordinance: 1. The 'existing code differentiates between general services and special services,and has two different sets of procedures. The some procedure should be required for both. 2. The Chief of Administrative,Services is currently authorized to`secure`professional services .in an emergency-upon approval of 'the. City Council. . The,"n'wv ordinariee W Id allow the. City .Administrator-. to,authorize a department director to secure these services in an emergency. A full report of the circumstances'of all emergency purchoses would be filed with the City Council. In an emergency, it is not practical to wait for a Council meeting or call a special meeting. 3. Detailed verbiage regarding statements of qualifications and performance data in'tiv purchasing office'has been removed. 4. The existing ordinance-,.requires that :Council,select a consultant and mstri the director, and.City. Attorney to negotiate c contractual"agreement. Th;-)*eement may not be presented to Council until the next meeting, thereby resulting in a.two'or three week'delay. The new ordinance allows*the City Administrator to present his recommendation and a proposed agreement at the some time. In summary, the ordinance simplifies the procedure and allows Council to hire consultants In a more timely manner. FUNDING SOURCE: ne required. i i3 I ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Make changes in Me- proposed ordinance,or allow the existing ordinance to remain in effect. ' ATTACHKENTS: r manes CWT:JC:de .r- no Val , ajat.� ifo..c:.. ?i. i-s.«�a.+i:.�. ' ... .. .. a�aSJ.:.i.i'�.%�%a w.=✓'•.r. -iY-.••t Y^..:..r A CITY OF HUNTIl GTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 1MWrOGT YV KAM TO Charles W.-Thompson, From Jeri Chenelle, City Administrator Administrative Assistant - Subject PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Date September 20, 1982 ORDINANCE It,"Should be 'noted that the City Attorney .has refused to approve ; this .•ordinance .as to form because of the wording in proposed eection. 3.03.060(c) . This states: "If,,the 'procurement has: been. budgeted, a. contractual agreement s1ia11,be negotiated 'with::.the consultant subject'to ,final,�appro- $al as.'toYfonaby the.City Attorney, and as to�contentby the ; City; Administrator. The final agreement shall 'be approved by. the City Council." ' ; f , '•,�'r--•.' .•.:.,r ,,_ .; ; .,fit �i'» :: . .:•. ..•, . ; ' ::, ;,'� The City-Attorney would like-'the previous wo=ding i, the, old'.section i =r (e)., rhich requires'Council,ao "ii►struct• the'.-director-and the Citiv� ; :`Attorney- to"negotiate 'a contractual agreement. " Although this is obviou'sly;`contentratlier than "form, the City `Attorney wi-1l,.not `"approve as,:to form" this' ordinance:because ofi.ahe above asagreenent.w She feels that departments steed the 'pzesgure of that . wo=ding to inciude her.;office in. negotiations. :. our..position, 'of . course, is that :the F.ttorney cannot be •overlooked`because::,she. must approve as to form. For, the purposes_,of this ordifiance,,however, neither ihe' 'de'partments nor the City Attorney need be•mentioned: 'Jczl.p . 1 1 t + L 1 i c � L � • y. -s `• ;. ti . ,•,~•� f - \�x 17 VVI It ©vEi� OL.S'A e'er%C'A IWZZ anrtiP�.vC':iSt:L+t'I.�'•lil.::h::4+ila ko..aL:rN•,irr«7i�i:�:+�7...+1'f.:.?..x..,...«....r•.-.__.. ._....,,,,,-,_s•.yr.....��s,•..,....•._...__ ...........w ,,..,.:;t_:.. , 1 "•. �.'.:�„J.. •t•. ••;� .ram REQUES"FOR CITY COUNCILeNCTION Date May 22, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council, Charles W. son, City Administrator/� 11 ! ~- Submitted by. TIC { ;r APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Prepared bY: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works C vJL Subject: Parking Prohibitions for Street Sweeping T Crff CLCR_- r :iStatemant of low,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Altemative Actions,Attachments:',/ Orr-street par during street sweeping days on City sheets continues to-be a problem throughout the City. t RECOMMM !MON: pt:a policy_of approving the installation of no. parking for street sweeping" signs on-.City streets and enforcing sane when"a petition signed by a majority of property owners on said streets has been submitted to City officials requesting these signs. � . �11rThlLYSISs�:... . •, '` ;:. �. , In,1980, toe.City Council appro nod sevrwral staff rec�ocn lotions.designed to improve the city!s street st.+eepfngti.program- 4 � - Fc r i stineet weepers were leAsed and'becJan opexating in September, 1980. Swing . effie3eruy has dramatjcally: ed due primari.ly,. to Little down time,:and maintenance . requ r ,ts as compared to the old street sweepers. . Parking prohibit�ioii signns'.vwere'in- stalled in Septic-arixr, '1980.in the townlot area of downtowri arid'ehfor�nt of these,:signs j be*. NWedmX, .1980: 'This program has been very,effeist3ve with respect to sir'ee+- sweeping. Qver,.3,000 citations have been issued in this area since last November., In- diptiwns are that residents of the townlot area are respecting the parking prohibition signs, thereby allowing more efficient street sweeping. t ,�X: ' � :y'.- '�'lil�-tit• f A.public;in£ormatir�n flyer was enclosed;in.the JariUary, 1981'issue of the Huntington Beach Sands with a nap,showing the street.sweeping'schedule for the City, and requesting .wlun tar:, coplianoa by remving parked vehicles from the streets on the'day on.which they are'to be swept. This flyer was again enclosed with the. Sands in the March, 1981 issue. Staff was d *wed'to evaluate the public information campaign regarding street sweeping and report back to the City Council on whether it was effective. t*-- have.polled Yair+`st et:sweeper "operators. to detwmi ne thei r'opi pions 6f whether`t1v!re has.�been a noticeable oaip]iance to no parking on street sweeping day. It was their con- sensus that.the signs in the townlot area have been very effective, but the voluntary. c o npla ante througlmut the rest of the City has not been significant. We also continue to receive coapl,aints about vehicles parked on sweeping days and requests to post no parking signs, allowing the issuance of ciations for violations. It is staffs opinion that the mast effective way to keep our streets clean is to prohibit parking,during sweeping days. it is also felt, however, that no parking signs should not be'postei on streets or for entire tracts unless a majority of the property owners request then. In this respect, the neighborhood has made the choice for clean streets with the realization that friends and relatives may receive parking citations if the signs are violated. PIo 4181 a I FA%Dmt for C icai.,l. Action Parking Prohibition for Strut gwwPin! may 22, 1991 Page 2 1.Do not authorize the pasting of parkirg pmhibitiom for street steeping. 2. Authorize posting'of packing prohibitions based on omplai,nts without: renuking a majority petition. � j 3. Direct all ingw3ts for street awaeping signs to the proposed Transportation Cacmdssi an for decision. 9. Authorize the posting of street Sweeping signs thraughaat the entire City without ra6jvests,frdm citizens. action estbated at 2,0 G0 per:year would:acme eeri�s orr the revaim $ the,Fubli.c,%irks 'rperating budget. ' Alternative. No. 2 would cost an"estimated additional $3,400.. ,•Ateihative No. 9 kKiM Gast ap*oximately $75,00 which would Come frccn th Capital Outlay Fund. Ped it ' �I I fs 'r1"rLGQi�rJst'.rwnew++.+..---'.,.. ....--�... «.wr..:+w:.tra ....�.=.':.t�s>t,aitia..'i:'..:rat,:..,. „' "__ .•+w..r�.w'.+�45[rlavreWw�rJ1•r�.j.�e�.v� i 17� tr I+ �I I � I V .�+.��.� t �� 'Lw�1 ��ri�.�..�LR�•a�..Y.nti.��1M1T�� + :.•t:, ! +s. K{r': t` 7 r,� r yr :+ dt S: t A 1 l� ri:!^,!.. ""p� �r i�' r A�I' t •,>�� ' y.. ;' .� r+4 ... ry •;+>� "; ,�� 4� �.Yjls `•3t 4i,r.! 13' st 'r ,.�' r. . 4 fy}`r 3 r7 v » is �,ie ,�,1�',(� i" f aii I. r., .�" �• ! t� �'r:Fr+'� �` :'�...1. Rt S r ''F:.h. $, ? et � r�l'•, .�::r.'�R' .�,rn r+� r � t ?�C! {r. .,t.�,l�•t{' x._-,Z •y�.'i � t ! �!' r�`�„• t;+K"`� `i4 w � f`+jd' 4?..�vdw�t;,�'$i• '`'�;filc F' i,l, t� +.%Kt� 4+t.3: t �i'xt•'C,.'+�.r�f•}y{r+ 'Irr �^S .:''+S•j .S, r.r k! ,.t;►,fi �•:;n�a 1'yY±�...'A1''�•�`- ' r ��` 3� K �,Y'i 4 r+r }, �'r t. {. !. '!y1 e•, j t `!3!Y jT ","I �!'r'Y• �f{1, rr1 1}9 7{1,., ;!,1 1.o � �p'!1F 7.,y! `<t t '•;. (`t! 1 ;h.�'� �'4"�,'l. a x.7,',y 1 "i. 1. Ytl.it ht �' °i f,'i�'�i �rt�;�}tr t 16`�y •v i', `+iY; '�' "('l. TrP' + t .� .,e�F� e� ,�•,.f '� } 1+� ��.ti�] z v' 't o+,q �H�,;'« ,j x ,,�. x t •�r.� ty,•, �P"+' . t '� .. .+ri �'�� v�i �• i� �•y�. � -r:r.,+ ,�-., ! r'7 Kr. ., r r'+'r Y, b•r`� X t. ? +�4'!. '('j 1. s'r !"1:, rr ^.'x r•,11 [ {i t - .. ,. r.<:.�,. +� ; try"w; ++yy V r b,•x-,C�tr (,i } 3 ` '�r!!: '.!'1,, �i �„ ''i7w+ # S {... '�� .:1p� n.' t '�''t1`` !.+"ti`irlal,•},,'�.S�'t�•yks i.�tii'3��d��S',K•.: R',.d ��3 `};rtr.. 7C t��?��;'�r ' 4`�t?�'.•Y �+.�. 'F4��4 ��a v .'x •, rKv,iM r.P,y ' li 14 .�It,;'•� {1. +�..519 ?i+f � 4 r� .`r",".C�:'�jl�.lr�i•t�`+�' •� 7, (.{� ++,y,f.!�'�,• i (� iri"}S i �R `:!Pkj rt}i°i�uYx �rrf��:3t•J �;r"i;, ��JY.��Fb�'�:r ��cr'i�,t;� 5rti�a.t'.t`�t,,Xl`"�x•Ytr•"'t"raS.L'+ t��{,r ��+�t;.?,f< +K'.,( ,,} "�y,S'�•'t+ .�.�'S 3 �i( r 9!•,f"• tT i�l �':' Z k t 4 sa,w. N( tv r :1.:�'1':f V wV \�"S'7'�'�1Cti �[ 1 Tt'�' s r aJ td"a,+r�'i`�• r'3 if M1•k..+ �„3' � •'ti,'L�E� � +�'' O�i.`Y�y{(,.•n�,rt ��}' � ��'�t; ^ry,�•7p,;•r,rf�S^�.�•! .� '6i'y•d,lF'drq,.i'��`.�'n'�t'G ex•,��•yy !!v"�'�'' rlj�:,�tyr+��1-�. .^.��j`vx '�'"�,} F"��-��+ .+fit �.i��}�� rhrr �I��jf't` +3 r 2�• r, .ttyF�`{�j� t.�r�r ,�� ,;'jQ .��1' � l.,, y4,, i :R` ,°�G,;i f': � r Fl;� � �,�if� !;? ! �, � � 'C �. j ` �"^fM,�'"• 1. '''�,�'. :%�� '�C� � r�lh� .'}{ .t+� p r.Y qt!�'4,• �%3•. '''' R'i .1. ti+r«._ '.� €�f�,d..* S . "(!' + i�"'-LLa"w�'� � r -.--'.�~_.-_ t •�h tom._ '.'""`.. �..... &11 •A RLEMCF FOR CITY COUNCn. AGTI �3 Date ark C. 1982 OIPEJD f) Sr :'mitted to: honorable Mayor and C. iuncil ny CtTy Co`"N SO)mitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City #,,. inistrator r I� Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works' crTr cLe Subject: Funding for the•P.epl ace►ent of Exit Light Fixtures at the Edi son and Murdy Community Centers. Statem•_nt of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Sourm, Altemativa Actions,Attachinems: Statement'of Issue: The Department of Community Services has.been citeJ by the Fire Department due to inoperable exit lights at the Edison and Murdy Community Center's. Recokmndation: Authorize .the expenditure of $5,000 from Capital Outlay Funds for the, purpose f j Me necessary fixtures. Th6 Public.Wo"r,&Building,Maintenance Division has been seQking„ta.'corre'ct tY; , ' ino erable..li hts for: about a. ear The" on anal' install tions were units fr 7 p. .0 , y 9 a Jai special: batteries;,,and;the .units;.are no longer manufactured. . In;`seeking the eE.,; economical .soldiidn, other.<, contacts"were• made,`. and,,finally;a vendor.was found ..:tried to'rnanufacture a' battery that woul d .fit,however without success: ._A new type>has beeri:developed which. generates its'own light, needs'�no batteries,: and is reported to lastf:for ten years. The two subjd6t'centers require ;.total' f. twenty-four -fixtures,, and they; have been priced at a. total of $5,000 ,for the purchase. Emergency .exit.'lights,:are a code requirement.and,must"be,'operational`, and it.is`Aniportant at these centers due to the numerous,meetings 's.cheduled. The iroiitine,rrraintenance accounts in the budget are not sufficient to fund such a mass replaceirent as these units represent. '< Fiindisyi Source: Capi tal' Outlay. Fiinds. -Alternative Action: •. None available, Attachments: F.I.R. CWT:PEC:DWK:m3 f71 PC 4,111 ��77 r�;+il►;irdr"-�•r•'rT'u.Mw�+r-••-�. '�'•.�-..�.........•.+r.....r�...�......��.r h.c y.L'i ,,.,..ln•..r...,....•,,..�_...._.•__�....—,.., s-.........•,....,..«....... •-.......r..i«r:..v A:�"'..,,�+�,M;,�t i71.1'0!' ..,+ i t r r Y r�U rE � p r ,I t 1 f r y • 1 ! i •y{` I Y �" 1 'i�L "i••".'•Ior N�"A+".!-.q u• M'tr Mrirl+'��1•� �� "+...w'r!'r Y"Mi►r•1 _ .l X t \ {,, 1 .�n+1+ wSP h..r,}".,�rP•+`:r'a.,f�1 +>'r' ?. j{.! iti Y! a`t' r1+jj1," .+ 1' •fd��. !jA.1 ,d ti�.,.. 'r-0'+'�ijy�.y» :24. T��•• • di,C4. '1 f'.-`•.r.}-,Y}'. .,5. �y+y 7 `?"b'•3 N. } (A' 1' 1•, tr 1 L f \ s fH'!, ri r• !�,•.t t ! •� �' f' d` 1, +1 }'+ if t+t.f '.'r`2 •; ..d• t F.. 4� Y., +.''�,.."r rr1 �c'f: ir�� r d �j.a*�:. ! (; r ,Y,� :5 ,, (3.�ti�Jt ;t +� 4•.ri'' '�`.'3 `i'':a,'.•, S: t, t.3. )�+ ['�.".*T 9 r t Y•rq'd,`7,t;r+.y r �•�'„ S44 ,R•, ,y ! €,� (fh, `��: rr. .!• + ^i rf• Y€6 ) s w ) 1 .., ,`r•E £ 4 11.Y. \r' rii^4(c,,r` dC ,i �i+�.« f-.a ' + +yt;, '3�+. r r.4�r .+r. ,�F"•+ }.3, ;. .'44 {, I V ,, � h,�T �,, FF d r rV _.F S Y r'• L ; i?� ..' +t ,yet 9•y1 ,d y , n .t! p� +7 r '��IJf, t r! Y•.?r� ! ht J + 'u}' �•'ili`d, •'� 5{li�`}�s / rrC,•a�i � f �.,�, �rF i� { 4't•5+;: �'{'� ` � �,+7 9 � r1 +rz d.l�` �, ,ri. I ti .4y �+' e�'.• i,Y .r4%.f! �1`�l i 4' .' �••� . �'' 4'1 to 4+`{,` ,•t:.�...}`�; �n � •�`i'..'�{� '(�' �' . �. ' /}.l•lr7�r, i .E' �ft� '�� r t .r;•... ?yx a r i L..:t ft•, a,' r t "{,1 ,�. +t't l�r�+tl f rl+k�a rr r1.1;.' F' { t'."E {�� r !S tr.l�wfrr'�dT,.�.E ��1•.9,.+,"��, .n ew-4� h F .tL..�^':?V( � y "',� • 1 },• .f;"1'f•'4 r��! j:t 1,•;.a>i},� Y��'• �:�,•�t�'?�r•N r.'.'�S; �.."('; °Y.'i'kf'Y t r�;�+''',�§"� 'S# T.��+•''`•f'�' {'� -•{�i..�J �;y * I.at�4�l �,�. Yy fit,°d; .� �. !r ,i �trn ., `,j , u; ,i:,r•r.' f Y n. f, t f�; ,- �,`1 4�r4o + }�yt��ri'�{•.n°.,�lw� � .r tf7+ % r�`��k �f.-� kir y� ,�.. .� �j i rC;}4 '�„ , � �• "� t�•y, h {�� t�, r. rr 1�. ,�.+4.9 ,(y�'i }f. '�• 'ti n. T ;�'�,., Y' �;� E'•. ,a,{�r t � fY:J t•;; �i e'�,.",�Y�;, I,�,i'4 i� �:�.• � � d�t3�•„�Y, rr• i!•`t�Z l+�l `ti:1'I.+ �'1,,yrf, t,,`�0 aa§� r+� �'�{ "X �r^�•� fir:' ;ditiis��"� ;;,�+�' t 4�, w�'�Y .t r (', wYi.• ,.{t ti+l.�:E� �•'•ajtt,(,�i�dF � i1r �Y �. ��:f�•�:6 ,�i •� �1�;+ y i� :� ��T" l�: ,1�. ,�t� r#11..',f' s�'' ��f1�"'C1 v,.� �,••,��Y�•f�P•q �i'T� '�'.i.b. �L,re,d a� r YP Rt r t y� N � ie �d' `,`) l ' li�r!".� hAt�a�,��•��. i+w .� l+� • � ty w.+�'�d:',•+� t';^ C.'3 � � s� i + I� tt ..(g� ��• 1�fd' �,R � r. tl�yk.}E�'�.)}}�dlr Z. �'`�'%`1'"•"f! +�+f+�r Y�r�.itt$,��.�{Y f,,rr �,�, •�,•� ,Y ,�!� SL � .�f +� ! {��,.+�`>j,:� u,,.; �•�}��'� �'+ 7 .,_.. � f.C3+kiilYtr►7 �/ °�',[ w.:�1+ �3i.�,..i�i1?�t ''fit' br �' 7 .� �. TEt':� it�.rt! °f3'��t�.'X13k+fLC�Y��:.�f��;;1i11�:{al�.L'�i:�,f�ii,9:4ctirti„iY, _ _ .s... - t—"— -�...r•, r J• CITV OF HUNTiNGTON 13FACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - raxrteve�ov�t�o1 To , Charles W. Thompson From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Suaject Funding for ,the .Replacement pate January 5, 1982 of'Exit Light Fixtures at Edison and Murdy Community _. Centers . FIR 1 81-95 in"resporse_:to the Public Works Depart ,.:nt, a Financial Impact Report has been prepared ane submitted with: respect to. the department's efforts In correcting the inope .ablc.. : emergency exit lights�at the two centers. It has been suggested that ^the replacement ' cost for the twenty-four Fixtures-will• be $5,000.00. ,. s : Adequate..monies are„available In the Capital Outlay. Fund for such purposes: Should the Clty Council approve this expenditure, the balance in the fund w111 he reduced:to $466,745.39. i F. B. Arguel Chief of Administrative Services. FBA/AR/cg i 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT ":Project Name Request for funding to remedy Inoperable lights Description Funding for the replacement of exit light fixtures at Edison and Murdy. Community-Cersters 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1.1 One-Time Costs urn., ac . . " s. -uisition Con'structioi�� ties E ui meat O[her�.. : Total°Cost 59000" 5 000 ' 1.2 . Recurring Annual- costs fr. _ Additional. materials 0 uts de Pa roil Personnel Su lies Services '`Revenues` Tatal'"Cost 1.3 Repiacw.nt/Renewail Costs N/A r 2. INDIRECT COSTS Loss of potential earning power on these funds. f ` Financlal Impact Reportr) Page 2 ' 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A 4. BENEFITS.T0 BE PERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Operational ,exit lights at _the community centers are a code requirement; the lack of''same has clearly been called to the City's attention by th - Fire Department as well as the potential liability factor if remedial action Is not soon forth- . �..._. corm nO. 5.. PROJECT USAGE Dai1Y. ti 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subsequent to City Council approval. j ). CUST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT In the event of a Fire and resultant personal injuries at the centers that could be linked to the lack of operative exit lights, the integrity of the City's fiscal _posture could be sorely tested. i i t f �• `� Amo : RE-QUE:., f FOR CITY COUNQ,_. AC-rt0 S Date Dnce ber 9,--1981- S. mittedto: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra aO Pr-oared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works%�Zf- Subject: Funding for the'Design and Manufacture of Roll Over Protective Structures for Six.Equipment [hits. Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,,Nternative ActiGau,Attachments;Or," Statement 'of Issue: An.'inspection made by a safety engineer from Cal-OSHA, on December 1, 1981, revealed that the City has sA equipment units without R.O.P.S., Roll Over Protection Structures*!; which are required by %w. Recommendation: . Authorize,the expenditure of $12,000 from Capital. outlay Funds for the &sign and manufacture of the rcquired units. Analysts: The State of California, Department of Industrial Relations, made the:requirement'for -�i Roil Over Protective Structures by Section 1596 of the Construction Safety Orders .to be effective on November 1, 1970. Originally there were compliance dates ranging from April 1,-1971 to July 1, 1977, depending on manufacture dates. Due to the fact that all past compliance dates have expired and that the inspection has revealed the deficiency, the City must now adhere to the law. fundin4 Source: Capital Outlay Funds. Alternative Action: None available. Attachments: State Requirements CWT:PEC:DK s . s !I , I i :Q+ - • UL Ivy— Nu ARTICLE 19 105 tt.I On or after January 1. I%o July 1. wn "4 _ • �. and prior to July 1.1:'69 (D) Prior to January 1.l9r4 July 1, 1977 Ilf operated under any of the con- ditions specified in tiecilon 1;+5fi(&) (2)(11), (I) or (Ill or 0111.1 ' .r tractors.EXCEPTION: to lleettoa 1S96fal f11:Rids booav pin a laying s '�; -"',s;;':-w1,,•s �► (2! 1lollers and compactors having a mass greeter than r �..��•.- �rJ:: ' � =0 )wands (2700 kilograms); -s fist •'( l.f AeleC Ness Is of watacbreft►sowed rwLt d go vA;ds lsdaft - .tfKas • ♦• :ifs sltadwab ht a is"s ts.rd aa...•--+ seen st se:a►uv M/ cotters. (A) Rollers or compactors bav)or. segmented and/or /ems abcepefooWype wheels or drums by July 1. 1277. (8) Allrollers and compactors [other than those specified i • la Section 15W(a)(2)(A)1 when opefatlas; unt:ees any of tt:e followlas eondlttons on or after July 1. 1947; 1 , • (1) Parallel to and within J feet of a down dupe ate---per than 2 feet horizontal to 1 fact vertical, or t i i' (11) VoUbin 3 feet of a vertical or newt vertical drop-off.. y p•o ,.•a' r �,�:,..• . ., -� ucetding 1 toot in height.Or •''=' (its) On any grade exceeding 13 percent (10 feet borL ., saatcl to 1}4 leer vetika]). ;tit+ � f _• a t EXCEPTION to 8ee:tou 131i(alfs1f111: smooth steel satze1' 1�►�l:r. ": • +w+F'r+• rollers where the operator stands at the=creme rear of the r ' ` (b) MrS De*tgn Crllmia. BOPS shall be In compliance with ►r,:�':.': ` or equivalent to SAE Recommended Practice J-1040•a. February. •:•; T 197b, for equipment manufactured an or after April X 1971. EXCEPTION: ROPY and conopies hating d label with a � r t Caliloraia eppronal xuxnber and installed on the sperilted - r model of coastructiots equipment for wAkk the ayprovat was • +- r •. ., grantee '' - ` :3•�i;.e;:_• :a r (c) Overhead Protection. ROPE shall provide opezalor pro- ••::,��i .''.:. tertian against the hazard of failing objects. -. - i; - -. i.'tr.F•..•..r.. .•r:x (d) Ilsiroflt DesignCsIlrrfa. The following iteam comprise the - �r• M,. ». • .t . +"":•,�- f�'� '`� basic design esiteria for retrofit HOPS used on scrapers,tractors, ,. �....��r1e `. •';"•':^�.y%�'�` 'w"•�~ `'r: front-end loaders. bulldozers. motor graders end water wagon prime movers manufactured prior to April 1 1971.and for rollers lWW and compaeiars manufactured prior to July.1..1977: i" • (1) Designs shall be based an one of the following.- (A) SAE necountaendcd Pracilce J-1W-a, February, 29M r -.• J. N,s: �� r �;'t • t or 8; Structural anrdysL ealcuWkas egrtvalent to 8h.E J- (C) Capability to support at least 2 times use Brats vehicle `'• . :' '• •' weight appiird vestically and the independently applied load } «-�'t'=:i:rt�1'►-'r'r'• ''''`"�1� .. 1 of not less than IM times the gross vehicle weight applied I +. troriwatally at the top of the ROF'S. ems-::3r3�:�3��*:r•"�.,�i`»j- :�.: � `r;�.:JS.�{ w...�,, ay;;• 1Nhc 1.rrsu 2AW0*ride iul.def go AWS. a0 Gwds sd stet twys4ds -s. .',• , nem he scour ru M nr sdide. i 2. no strod" tlusnrihres at be •dndr Its" wet be WNW I. sr /rep el W aaK srs7a+• r• -• . .. .,-. • •;�' •.� ... _ _-'. : I�+�\ MJC 4/J11i 60 iesaws d fad as ty ..r t!':J..�..•+.--,,,,.- _M.1. ..-- T. ... . .� �+'�-:' a'• 7. i•Sip a7Kd ra be [Cm ;+t •-• •w e; ;Y�'�-_1•wt (2) The Inside dtmerulons of the MPS shall meet the 1 i:,•�•+';�_•_•* s • �: flexdion lltniting volume requirements of SAE J-=46 July. '•�;r+.��.^'w,' •/t 270 which is a rectangular approximation of the normal ' ,;,�'.';;� •.- r�";�`':'1• 1,.�►� i`n��:'ar«i� �+J �/y�] seated pCslitan Of a 74-loch, 215-pound opentu: wearing a ✓. - �FR �y :r hard hat. Jc:�f:r?'r: 57�,••q•r •t•«�', -•. i. r:�'r�-h..' •� (i) The design of the RO"S shall be approved by a regts- �+-.rt.i�rr✓.s�':;'rz�"'�'1,:_`"s:,:-, f�x•y=r:; �t teml civil or ratehantcal anginrcr. �..;„• . }. -�� _ (e) 1ltodttleailon or Repair. BOPS required by Section 1SMW �ir•�' �/�rr��♦•�,A�'�,�,��y.C+r.�'•. ,n �M�,.a��.:•� �,.�,h�,�`r��'x. ,��"".s R�'�'�'��%••�3�-i►•s�*tw�y"�+'a��/-}��' ""�'�+��`�. •w,a�• r �+'•— �i.M+••.+G•• �r.�K�U•-^�!!!••' '.�•r �.•�'�C1'•Y •r- e !a�I '°/'7�1~•"� ^�"Ir.+' �r 1 rsr�i+��~�:' 1 •► w t � TII�•E 0� � Ifs 1CMU w fit: i have the wte;els chocked and the pa-king brake set or be other- wise prevented from moving by elft.trve mechanical means. IGfMry;h ?Ss.►r.rt (1)lidl h:21-7s;HAdin r:k0ok dsf NO&OW Rrtrs , IZOL rueling Equipment. (a) Ito internal eornbustton engine- driven equipment shall be fueled with the motor running. (b) A good metal-to-metal contact shall be kept between fuel supply tank or no--Is of supply hose and the fuel tzsk. +�,. tf �•. ~••✓= "'i (c) No open lights, we)din& or sparking equl;rnent shall be /'� •++�+•��• ,+`vim`y` I.. "• `*�•'*r'`'i)►•J� w,6, used near internal combustion equipment bring fueled or »etr ti r •• 4 stsrage tanks. •� rrg,,+► • - storaget or near the gasoline i area or an equipment being fittedueled. Post i conspicuous `•`~""ram • signs to each Teel storage and tuetinr area sbtiag: •IiQ SHOK- 7 -•- ING WITHIN t5 Fr=.` i (e) The use of air pressure to force at liquid from one con. - ;• talner to another Is prohibited, Unless the container in which the pressure Is to be applied has been designed and constructed 'r for the pressuso Involved. (f) No repairs shall be made to equipment while it Is being 3 :"-"+4ti„+��'JS`•,.�"'�.� '•• fueled.. . _•..�:».�.� ,r�..:. .. f.,*s4• 01. ;, (g) Bach fuel storage Unit or drum shall have the word � y,�y.,�";,•: '� s. }..,��;.. .•i ' � •Mmmabls" m consplcuouulr arked thereon and should also have4Y { . at simlUrlr stud word Indicating the contents o;the container, Chi A dry chemical or carbon dkwMe fire cstingilsher rated •7 $-.SC or larger shalt be In a location aexea M* :a the facling e r tSf s. Itep�alr eat Ir a Vehidea,Traetars.VWH*rers sad 9nt- t i•. llar FgnlpmenL (a) No repalrs &.hall be attempted an power ! , y.. .. f equipment until nn=p;tnmts are made to eliminate possibility !! ' } , of in)nry to repairmen or other&. caused by sudden movements i or operation or the equipment cr Its parts. When the equipment "'• being trpaired Is a bulldozer,carryall tipper. or other machine -►-_-w- -s • ,'�';= •�` •f.,,r-may.•s, �: having sharp or hear; moving puts such as blades, beds. or • -!i•4•�+��'M. sa y Sates such Parts shall be lowered to the ground or securely and i'"� •• �"""�"• =.rr,.•r...- .,,��,r.� loci y toekt4 in an inoperative position. i y -••��. r•r«• .vc�^►,,• , All contrels shall be )n a neutral position, with the motors %� "'�• ..v,. otherwise. .Lei, s►^!��' IJ _ stopped d brakes net, unless work belay performed requires ]I f-•- j~.f;;•? (b) Trucks with ies shsall be equipped wrilb positive J '....�. . means of support. p.rtnanentl�,attached,and capable of being 1 �r•, locked in position to prevent aeeidenstal lowering of the body Y while maintenance or inspection work is being done. t, t&np; 1.Resaw IC SAW"" Of %IVA a v) rAW 02•rt,, •tsdive Wsla e , r+wi"`` u is:.nwc..Ir,rr.n do awmaw tam 75. l are 111. Q ver rrate•r live SL,trrturrs (Itt)Pl.)• cal Installa- etlnle, IIom and seat belts fate Section 1W61gil shall • be hastalled and used on all equipment specified in this Section r; :e '^t''�.�-.- :•:' ��'"�J`,i •_' in aceardauce with the followin,: effective dates for each type: '. `,, ----- •- -- or use of equipment listed below: s.r -�wr�.t;• :vr»r.r Ada no 0 oisa of 0"":DM M $a sr*is eer-eita e"*MMet01 s .,Z ,r... •rr�-;•y�tr. • - t,• . . ' (1) Scrapers, tractors. front-end loaders. bulldozers. mator ! ,Tr. r.• r.,r.. graders and water wagon prime movers having brake horse- - ^. •. � ..•: , power rating above i� . ,,, •...•-. :-r•.r� ••, • ', ` ' . Z4ripment llanaticturs Daum Effective Date for = • r . �� UOrS and real Milo J r� _ ♦4 r (A) On or alter April 1, 2971 ------ April 1. 1971 i . ... • +.'' s`• •+� •' -► 03) On or after July L 2X9— January 1.1977 M J:- and pries to A;zU 1.Ml •ens ' t .�'�, ��1!i��r�yi�.'r�tilr'�.r.��,�,s j�Ti+er+..i/•�-•�'c•,�__',�•_..'_y�."��_��,�+.:,��-��+.Ss•�!•'�•r*�` ''"_a`''y'x!..,�y.�.s"r'T`'��`��L.+.D'wr�,.r�'yr"'.`'i`��'i ��•�I�„"�"*--�- «r � '' .7-..y►',1'�'!tRt-.•.''..-i. •�+�'�"�+�hv�"" � '•• T...� 7J." .M••u,,..' „�.i.•I""� r�. y� .'i r•. '.:.:. :3�sr�s;,{: Ct�!� jF'len+aCt;., -=•r'"""o'«._.. • •-+-•►zs. -.r""t.'ur✓ , •'�!`1�,:.6.�•F/w!;wnr.8• �tL�;•�•�tl;5t:ittE;�3�ws,.';: ,r !A .. . .. .. - --` --._.�..-"---�..�_._._ ....eau... nu• •t•r6L•t.rf�.YM f +.•I• i may be modifled or repalred, prorts'ed such modification corn. plies with the provisions of Section I:.W(d) or Federal OSH.: r ',t Standard 19%.U=(e)(2). .A (f) Iisbellar, EachILOI+iI a'.yW bear at labs!with the following �•' r.+ information; (1) Manse and address of the manufacturer, i .•w,r•- :.:. -.-,..�:. ..7 (2) lfanufacturces ItOPS model number, t -V?'►t�••- "'f•, "`t• (2) 3talco And model of equipment fur which the ItCP3 is ' ' %`,,.,,.,�• t• :a•.■� ..�- • ♦ ~ try designed. Y•S r �r r•*r�,,� ,^.t''�1�t-_,�� (!) Astatement of compliance t tth 8/.E Recommended i t sT'�►Y�=-.5r •p'�'_ +i Practice XICNO-a. February. .575. or the requ rements of Use ': ;. ..t► ..t:%.. �•+R California Construction Safety Grader U96(d) or Federal 0SHA r•--••:•�••••�+- Standard 3926AM(e)(2). ; •- - l:•• •, ;; Labels shall be stamped plates or other permanently attached �• means of ldentiticat)an. end sisal( not be obscured. obliterated i S•." or Changed. r ig) Beat Belle.Scat belts shall be Adequate for the Intended �y 1'; service and In gaed repair. Belts previously approved by the a';, •. Division and Installed yrr-or to Januar7 1. 1S71. are acceptable -.. ..r_5: .:.: ,.•c_:::� ' provlded-they remain serviceable. litells Installed on or after �:;:•.., ...,:_,:,:. __, •.:.J;:• -• ,,�ti. = J.=u=T 1. 1971, must meet tlse following requirements, -which ,,r;• - . ••� parallel thaan of the SAE Iteeommendcd Practice J•ii;6 s, Tda- eznL vember.IM.and the applicable provisions of SAE Recommended Prscw^J-f•t.July.IN& • ,. r" .-• (1) Adjust sicaL The seat belts shall be capable of snug ad- ` :.;r '_•; ° ;ustrneat by the occupant by a mear.r easily within his reach, 4,f%;` •. , or shall be p:avUkd with as autom&Uc locking or am Meaty •Z j :' (2) Xw%b -Each seat belt,shall be pesma tentli and legibly marked or labeled with year of nwaufacture. model, or style ; T•-t• number, and name•or,trademark of manufacturer or dig- tributer, or of the importer If manufattrsed outside of the i United States.Idarkirrg should also Include Indication of toss- .^�•:=�-• pliance with S" Recommended Practice P•3s&ss. ` z';:,1 •�'• ' .,' .:• . •• (2) St(ffne w. To mint-1 "roping". Use welblag shall be �' .•.•• •�`•�"' and/or treated to prodam a stiffness In the transverse :f, �►,�� +a� •�,y�.yl.• -.', r direction equal to or greater than that oltsined with a weave ,Q.a� �••�,��•.ti ,, ' �•.�'. of double plain with one up.one down binder,without sw.tfen. t;.•�?:_,3..�-r.•r'r w..1 .,r.,• This stiffness shall be effective for the srsable life of the ' webbing. The webbing shall be flexible In the. lowPOW '• direction to permit adjustment to --Q*F. (4) material. The seat belt webbing material shall have resistance to adds, alkalL, mildew, a>;ing, moisture and sus- �� .; ligtst equal to or better than that of untreated polyester fiber. ., -• ' �,� _ •, •�: • The webbing shall not be lets than three inches In width, its � ._ `- •; !t' ends sbal! be protected or treated to prevent.unravelling, and r+,J >�;s2` :i r• f`,�S •'f:1.':' the breaking zUength rhall be at least d.OW pounds (2.7=D kl;). • '+`�• ' �• ��• + _.�•••'� adr ro rear Mt see ssresbnl wd iaon" Valor. ru �" s"a�•°'•j'-aesa�' :Me�ss"r:^+; �_ . _ - feclw 1G57. Gearral Ir[rsLT taterr Orinr, .. - 's' vZ,�-t!•. .'.� c (5) 2tdesse.ThR buckle chill be designed so that,It can be ;;* 5*-,a•'r��.? ;'=`.";'!•'•.+��9,�"�}•:';xr,' easily released with a single mot(nna. It shall also be capable - i of bdssg released wild either avallable mlUencd hand. (6) Clnsurr,The seat belt Isuckle shall lie designed so that .. : . . - fs7•+30]Cr-:'_t--;t.,•-:.... _ It G'n lie easily classed %with lruttened bands. ►w.::": rv%r..y.- :.v::"". (7) I.o=tloa.Whca a Mao-piece belt Is used,the adjusitnmt �.:.�r,t.r,.�.:�,.., -r ••- . �1 r ,., . ,. •c tutan.: shall be. on =Ch Isalf.of the brit to allow for the ..*•rr ., .• • centering of the buckle an the operzbor. r; �•'f..�-,,s'•.;•� _ •.t„'i.`t .•..'.. "ter .' (a) Operatloa. Each adjustment shall be capable of being .• :ti=•'�'� . ,. ;.`• ;•+;.�.'^'.'�s wade with the use of one adtltned !sand t ` ` ` + '`-"" • . �� L++• �� :f;.+�•'. Lam• -•�,. (9) Testa. A typical c p'cte seat belt. aaxmbly, lneludsng t .i weobin= stamps. buckles, aljud=cnt and attaebnsent hard ware,and retractors,suaU bs capable of Fax:iag the Iollovrinr destrucUre tests: /„* i _a't*' +'•,, 4 7. 't• .'•+ter.. _, If •��W''• .�"r' "'•�..+ �4� .. ♦ �s"Z�+1i•. ��_ ��`��`� +ter^7,s•.}'��• �.( + %' �___"Yt�,ti ?._ �~ j�' � r�•^+�+- �3• t .�'"'"�'}}.•-_�~_e► 4.._�rir�Iti��/{•'i'+rF'j•.-1-.r`t�•' ~��"��.' !.. 1 t i .... T �Iwi. �j� �ri••'�'JR"'.'�:".L.:.r%Z�J7C"j`ar.i.,.—ili7�'.:;X.:.1G: � 1 � .....--..••-.--- ....,.". .. �_....._ ... _._..-.. ....,.ram_ _...�. ...� .. _. i ylw 1 (A) :.. • assetnbf P shall - • structural °f not Irxi than r, +rllhstand, without failure, ructu ramt,,,nent of Pounds 12270 k Gyf j) t?� lenur►di Il.liO k j r"my a fare, at#not ji�ssr *hall xth of the semWl 1 half of not lnerease more P between �.r.•. a Inches kllE anchoragex ecm j iwhen sup ect�(n increase 1 Inches (36 emorc�^n ch each s fiJ. !o it tos+Ce Lh'tr� 7 i .. Pounds brtakinj;nK AYE ate J=rdware durinr t Pound '�tA►`�'r.,:'r',�"t.�Y; y`•✓wrri�ry'..�f.:,111 (!t) Wkeryt7pe ACricul the tut of )� t fiat . ��K/ ate? • .ti. J;). not hrn �ei+�.��y,+r' ;✓-. �_ IF ON turd or w(1ee)i t!n0'Pet And ifirJcultural el i�ad�11 be Jastall� r:•• flog In aces uatrial used on all !¢sttcr with the Jr„rtallatjt+o tars used Jn all i••�. (2) The schedule iA MFAE$ I pj sPecltled -f ace.ahall Section amonjr,th Or AE SAE Reearntnended 1 ractice"meet aPprapriate -� pibrua 1974; SAX J�=h'S'pebruiM 197i:ASA1.or gtraalint; :�::s.t♦ ...�::�11 Mn. 13) PM 197recti • and. SAE J-10f +7'. 197�: SAE J-) 'l•2. .... �. R otss of ASAE Standard- it u ed. shall ryni ft � �'•�' ��<��;�.�'.,er,,��!�,��"y;.;�1'• m +ded 1'ractice j 2362.•Pchb tee fie require- � ►' r �3� ,-Y� . 'Industrial aPftucUc g-I"'&ad i ebruar7: 1974r7.. x971, or SAE `.- ..r+•i . . fir..•• •�_ of cqufpgteuitfars q remain efts� KYPe agrkultttrnJ or, i '". * { cause• Thy biter then were the specified models < S� Approval umber. beau a �jth WIr rroked for ►•tf 1Q L71;� ,aieti+ri Iy taorrrr California ' ; �• ,r,4ir�t 11•l( �(C�tlshr 7�• _ Z. $Ef ALPPENDIX . .►•._ c�,:.-• _..•_.• ;,_;,,~s'+'!. . PAGE 368 �""� :` �=i' '•_c s: v.. M u ARTICLE 11 VEHICUS, . { - 4. F1,IGMFI�►,B'4CA;DFS 'RAFFIC CONTROL, ° , •: _ AND WARNING .. flies exclushir�y to Vandf&m�ehlder rhieh srr tm :.a /:`:i 3 �t'' :ti.: . ••'' i a applicable in Ch tr, c•tad ehJ lar ca excluded from IV on job- �'�� '�:ti=�;jr a;•:•; �:�: 1 Vehieldl allowing manner, coda shall be equiPPed ar of zr► . ,�sr�_: +s•, sty„':: �,...r.•'. t /^� brake c7stem•�d 1 lure a srrricw brake These _ �;� .„r�s:;.r�"••-zri•4�+r r _ �rWJLJtmi,contmon wmpoawJ W bet;m'sn:aina teras� )•.r .! . ..'..'ir.:�fry•-f!.ys•»'».,1�:L r-'. ) irihIcim shall n�a! of Ida ', a�ined n oj,era'ed *U two headlights and two 'e«-r x- _t Brake Ilghkr steal!tc. make it Aestor use when canditions 'x'oz%r.-'r.•;:".+,-z-,•..:::_: �,-• -, t:be d �u.7 V''"'•- (c) Vehicles operable at all tip •.:s-Lrs1t'�w�r,�+n�-•„►•r1,•+.....yc::%f.r rr ��; w with Ines. . .1•. ..�. y. In lshield w•j moat Jutrt -s- .,r• . .:'�' •.•" Plated Ptrs crack o wtndshie' n i ;;�!r :• !ri"4�. `.. r, t�^.i'.lr!��s � ..•; prtrilinrompuy. IVJ.ereefp or wind�illel�iLaa d no�eered :•-.••�_. ter•,'' ..-��•�,,:,•�,it .^ •d• t, detOtt;jnfi or dzxr tiii or trvstjAk of wind bee re• i•.�•�F;-. �.7.�'•'y�t; �".,' •' Usjl ;• ett„l.twr bir�ta is to ti�Port rajPmcnt shr11 be reau, ;;••;.•i��^,!5•;•::r;r;;','••• -;s .:r "%� to Preclude Uon shall JIM, all icose nnel and matcrtalY• ;:'.ram .n�•� y s.`: :: any part of .Mvanei beinl!)nJtued items Secured In tools, ecr�:s•w'•!; ... eumat manner :. =,• «s•- (.� a i rrtor Of the load Or •:.•. ��+.:"'f t.''Q+•l+i err- �� _ - ' • -.ray i•. `.e•� ate. AIL • . .• , . •• ., I. r+e..a . �=...� �y�-••��:.�..}+ --•-•i ..:.....'•.-q.. -� f�.^..�^'tL"y.s+l�= �„- .... r..�..�.t,t-.�•�T.•t.. •Qw+i��+�..•�""t+�••!'�•r...�.'•1'�•�'��'.'�'� •,F�e�_••tlrl•r I'��l/�,�r pn".4"��1•iwr�.w� •/f:r*W r.•fY w.r1-',f:� .. ..v►r1�•'�: "'�"Ma•r• .r�. - ., .'�"."T�.:.s�.�� ...w�'YCMiufl•::11'�t:.t.�iL :�::+'�c�+.►w:..;�i�J.,'..•�C"". ''�,,-�».' . eta---�•,�..6._ ,.. CITY CW HUNTINGTON BFACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION . • ++�xviarcrav� . To,. , Charles-W.' Thompson From F. B. Argue]to City Administrator Chief of Administrative SerriIces Funding for the installation pf pate December IV, 1981 Subject � E 5 ;Appropriate Roll Over Protective Structures as Mandated by; Cal- 0 05MA FIRS 4f In esponse to the. Publie.Wdrks Department; a Financial impact Report .has been prepared and submitted with respect to. the department's attempt to :conform to, .' present' requi re,ment9 bf Cal-OSHA -relative to 'the caliber of;protective,structures. t for equipment units. It has-been suggested that the cost. for this .prolect •milt be %,$12,000.00. -" Adequate`morales are available in the, Capital Outlay Fund 'for such purposes. Should : .tha;City Council apsrova this exp6ndItu-e, the balance in 'the find wit be:i•educsd . •to.5�91,T�+S.89. . _ •,j� AXA44F. B. Arguel le Chief of Administrative Services -FBA/AR/cg t i 4 it 6 • . r t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINAMCIAI. IMPACT REPORT Project Name Fundiag for Roll Over irutective Structures Drsc•iptiots Proposcd financing for appropriatelratective structures for six '(6) equipment units as mandated by Cal-OSHA. _ DIRECT PROJECT COSTS I.V One-Time Costs Lana , urn., ac �.,. AcquisTtTan Eiruction tills f uT t Other, Total -Cos't 12,000 12000 t R 1.2' Rkc r'ring_Annual .Costs itiana Materials r utsi,S . Pa roll Persannal Su Ties ;wises Revenues Total Cos•• r. 1.3 Replccwiv�i/flenavii Costs- . NIA' 2. 1NAIRECT COSTS 'Loss 'on earning capability due to this expenditure. t t Financial Impact Raportr`1 S. Page 2 • ' 3r NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A 4, . BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT { Allows .far the conformance Co standards set forth and enforced b alw OS HA. -� 5,.. .,PROJECT USAGE , --Gal Iy. - i ti �i. EXPENDITURE TIMING l Subsequent tg City Council approval. . r."� n.r.•w�w��• r rrrirrrr� rr�..w.rrr, • r��..w rr r...r^...r r •rr��r 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE FROJECT The City would risk incurring uncertain penalties should further, delay be entertained. REQUr T FAR CITY Y CDUNQ .. ACT1d'N ' Date December 4, 1981 _ Siollmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Counci 1. Submitted by: Charles W. 1hompson, City Administrator am', Prepared fey: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works'/ <- &ib'ject: Funding for. the Design and Manufacture of Roll Over protective Structures for Six.Equipment Units., ti Statement of Issue, Recornr iendetion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,,A chrrients: Statment of Issuer • ' An;inspection made by a safety engineer from Cal OSHA, on DecemberIroil 19ki `reUcalnd that the City has sip: equipment units without R.O.P.S., Poll Overction Structures", which are required by- law. Recomriendation: _ Authorize -the expenditure of $12,000 from G ntingenc -Per for the design and 'T turn' facture of the required units. . - : Anal" sis: The State of California, Department of,.Industrial lations, made'the ,requirement for t RolI.OVer Protective Structures by.Section 1596 o the Construction Safety Orders to be effective on November 1, 1970. Originally th a were compliance dates ranging from ' Apri1, 1, 1971 to July 1, 1977, depending on ma facture dates. . Due to the fact that all past compliance dates have expired and th .the inspection has revealed the . �'. deficiency, the City must now adhere to the w. Funding Source: —Con tingency-Funds...._• Alternative Action: None available. P.'1 Vs r REQUEb - IL L ACTION .' 19. Date SeRtember 23, 1981 SubmitW to: Honorable Mayor and Ci cnrr , Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Admi.nistrato ,r Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Amendment to Ordinance Relating to Damaging City Property'. St nin ntof issue;neeomnmxktkm,Analysis,Funding Source,Altmnative Acddns,Attachments: i STAtriaNT OF ISSiJE: There is a need .to be more sF�:cific in the existing or�3inance. regarding : damaging 'City=property by including additional specific examples .af .what constitutes City.property. .RECOMMENDATION: o�tacEeW amendment to Municipal Code Section 9.52.010, Damaging City Property. TThe exigtiug Municipal Code Section 9.52.010, Damaging City .Property, was- adopted in" 1543. Since that time terminologies relating to. City owned property have changed somewhat. For example, the. terms "laitppost and poles" are obsolete and should be replaced by street light and traffics signal. In addition, the existing ordinance is .not specific regarding other ia- portant City property which is' highly susceptible to damage such as "street.' tree, waste container, fence and wall, " This amendment to Municipal Code Section 9.52.010 will update and clarify the intent and contents of the existing ordinance relating to damaging I, City property. ALTERNATIVE: Do not amend the existing ordinance regarding damaging City property. FUNDING SOURCE: No City funs are involved in this action. ATTACHMENT: Or Hance PEC:]y rid 4MI r' ., ...�i,...a....:.3 �'. ....,..�. ....__'•_: t" .` a ., TT . .. ....mot sh.;.: •:... — ;•. .:i i. } • t i Onb.�NANCE NO. �7 AN ORDINANCE OF..THE CITY. OF fIUNTimaTON BEACH AMENDING• THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9,52.010 RELATING TO DAMAGING CITY PROPERTY The Clty Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal. Code is hereby amended by amending,section 9.52.010 to read as follows: 9 '52.010*-:_Violation ' Misdemeanor. Every person who wil- fully xrStes upon, paints upon or draws upon, defaces, cu4:s, . die.- ntaces, disifiguree, removee, or mutilates any building, street, sidewalk, -Iamppea# --peleetreet Zight, traffic signaZ, ntroit tree, waste .container, fence, block waZ*t, bench, chair, table or other properly belonging to this city is guilty of a misde- meanor- SECTION 2. This ordinance ehall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of duntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the dII; of , 1981. i Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TC FORM: �i City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIP 1ED AND APPROVED: City Administra r Dirdetor of Public Works JCI:ahb 9/25/81 i I N REQUEC , FOR C \ Date December 11, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Tyr and City Council APPROYZD BY CITI COUNCIL Submitted by: C. W. Th aq)son, City Administrator prepered by: Paul L. Cook, Director of Public Works j Public Works Pee Adjust�ts /JDS' cc�r�r ci.�nt: Subject: �� Statei»int o1 lswc.fieoommendetion,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternathv Actions,Attachments: �✓ ;° SV aEMENr OF. ISSUE.. A idview of the Nblic Works service,fee structure 4 nd i cater that several. ad justmc:its need to be made in order to heep re enues'camiesurate with costs. ;< IJ - )WEE a UZ attached resolutions providing new fee schedules for sewer, storm drain and map processing, and adopt a new resolution covering cable television i,nstallaUcti. AMYSIS: ; reviewing the public works fee structure, it was discovered Chat some of "cur fee les are new inadecfaate. Data providedby3s9.Hews Record rirevfaals that the schedu cost of public works'oonstxuzzd= has risen over eleven percent (US) in-the last year, and internal time usage studies indicate that we are not being adzquately oanpensat:ed for map processing and cable televisi oar-Japper:tion. The fee structure should be revised as below:;,", (1) Storm forams Hesaluticn No. 4914, setting drainage fees, was adopted on May 20, 1980. The fee per gross acre in each open district should be increased by 11.3%. , (2) sewers Pzsolutian No. 4983, -establishing a sewer fee, was adopters in April 61 1981. The schedule should be increased by about seven ando;ie half percent (7.5%) to bewm current. (3) Map Processing : Public'WbAs map processing `Eees, now included with Dejeloprrxmt Services fees (Resolution No. '4880), should be segregated'and ircreased. A public works final.map prop ssitg,.fee of $250 plus $10 per lot s3houli be est62Ais ed, and a fee of $150 should be eol.lecb6a at the time a parcel,, map is submitted. (4) Cable"Television A fee far the'inspection of main trench cuts shw d be set at four cents ($.04) a 13nea1 foot of canstructim. Misr4llaneo s permits pertinent: to the repair of the syntecm should be icsued at the current minimum permit fee of $25 pe.:.- permit. F'[RQDII� No rig; MNe in p Loa only. ALTERVUM AMICN: tL> Con to auYent fee schec3uses. 0` I 1 resolutions CWZ.,F C:JS:jy rco 4MI , i t e C~�Ir.�►rw-'1'4Y•:Ea,j+".'C+'IM.""'.wry"'u"`"'""r ......�..-.-+.:.,,.w.w,.-...._.,......,.,i.,.......r.._,.W.. .r-.................�.....r..rr.....+..+....+...-+...-. wr•i..e."wwwa`n'.k1 pu1:+�M.k�ii y . it • I` 1 � REQUEST FOR'..'CITY COUNCIL ACTION COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION/ ' Submitted by VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE, DIRECTOR Department COMMUNITY SERVICES j bite'Prepared MARCH 24 , le 81 Backup Material AttachPxd Yes No Subject PARKING LOT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PARK MAINTENANCE YARD { ` City Administrator's Comments , ApPRDVED By CITY Approve as Recommended ;. ctry Statement of Issue, Reoommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF°ISSUE :., . .,:. There, is a need.,.within.the northeast sector of Huntington,Central Pa rk.:to provide more off- street parkingx for;' both the public and park maintenance,employees-.,,;; The Public,Works Department requests that a 47-space parking lot be constructed within ,the existing park and landscape df.vfsion:maintenance yard to. coincide with other improvements wfthin•.the yard that have been•authorized. The.Community Services Commission reviewed the plan and . budget amendment request and recommended approval . RECOMMENDATION Approve Public Works Department request to construct.a ,47-s pace'Oar king lot,to•serve'.both.• the public and:park maintenance employees within the`park:'and landscape `division"maintenance ' yard at an estimated cost of $23,655 from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund. ANALYSIS It Would be,advantageous to :integrate the parking lot develapmentwithin ;the city yard with other .approved projects including the moving of the.community clinic building'_:from ;the:old civic,center, site to the' yard, renovation of.,existing.buildings and, 'grading ;and paving of the remainder of the`yard surface, Additional public parking is needed in;thW area of Huntingtcn Central Park; especially when large groups of Scouts, YMCA. Indian Guides, .Camp. Fire Girls, etc. are using the park for their group. camp outs. . The employees will `have . better surveillance of their cars in this location and the major time of their use would not conflict with public use. HJUDING•SOURCE Park Acquisition and Development Fund, balance as of February 28, 1981 - $2,165;009.88. ALTERNAT•IVE-ACTIONS J1 Leave this section if.. the park maintenance yard unfinished until a later date. 2 Restrict use to e,,:p%';�/ees only. VGM/NLW:cgs Pia one ,y +,.r,;'.+Il•.•;.,I. ts�trnsn...........-.......»..•.....1..+•.-...a1..r:..:.,.•.....-,,.a..: ..aa.... ,,...... ... .. ..,... ... .....,.... ..«..............».:..+«:a....u...,r.+:ac+:r..ai.dLcx't Ii.Z;J . t ...:i..+r: �r.. .'e.. ., I'.1: .. ,.. .. Sf; •rjt�ws F1/�'+�`,s .+ !fI .. I .. r'•••••-•---+..a+�.. ., :[:- . • ..� �. E� tj rr_ .w a;� �L.•�1 u t.J• t}d r.� t, 'a �I.'J s a t� 7 .� t' '~s l.,.{s�. d INTEH-DEVAR i r►EN i Co-MMUNICATION • To From ki).Va.ncent G. 1•faorhriuse t��,r•yl Srnith . Directror, `Community Services Dept. supt•. , 1'arl', FPree & Landscape•. Subject Park; Tice/Landscape D7t` YanuaLy 271, i901 Maintenance ".ard Ile are requesting your nuL•horizaL•io;a and approval +to fund the ' constructioti.'of the narking .lot at ,3 cost of. $23,655.00 to 'bo paid 'from' Park 'Acquisition and DevelopmenL .funds. • . 'We have prephrad•construction ,plans and a cost estimate for.,.. • improvements to the'.existing sub;jecL facility. The' improvements - include clrading, lightLncf, repair of old farm house for bffices, relocation of Free Clinic to, Yard, dater/cl'ectric 'uLili' ties a'nd as halts p ny io ' The. public. parking in this area of 'thee perk i.s� very dcEicient:;: eSpecially„when Lhe.*largc groups of Scou'-s, S't1CA, Inds 'n"Guides,• etc. have their campouts. Therefore, w.. propose, to. construct the employee parlci:ny lot as a joint' use by thepublic. . This ,iriA:l ' 'add another fourty--seven (47) parking spacer, for. the:*park user I`. • . or,• weekends.•in addition to the existing fifty-five (55) spaces . . on cothard. t will have a view, graph of LhG facility and' a cli!iplay of. the area fcr the Community Services Conimis5ion mcuL•ing if 11c6c:ed and will answer any questions which may arise. • If you find this meets with your approval , P1ca6e ;*noLify .us of ' the account number in which these l:unds will he encumberec' • DDSs. ' l AI r J,�}1XFa3T'r•�. .... ........�..+..+..w.+sx�F:a.,,hsk..s...�r r.r��+•�..++w.w �ncs.+,�+I�'�11( I •1. -. -.c - Lt �_- .ram _ IJ f ' UPGRADE EXISTING` HOUSE-: "&FICES"; PLANT NIATERIA1. . ... _a:�-•a,=- �' ,. • ,. HO�:DING YAt4J ._.� MC FREE CL0 111 �• 0� ..r .. ,,, •,. ,,, ,., ram-•' •/' /•� •- _ PROPOSED A.C. PAVFEY ARE •:.ice ��ia!•"j �/�- ALL E WTMYEE/VJ=C PAkM?k•4IA►P. 47 SPACE PATUG M Lt7r:_ r� 1. EXCAVATION 60. C.Y.; @ 5.00 = $ 300.00 r, 2. ROG BASE ?20 TQ�15@ 9.00 _ $ 6,480.00 E k� 3: ASPHALT• 360 :7ONS"@ 40.00 $141400 00 4. FIIaC3IVG'� : = 4?5 .` @ 5.00 = $ 2,375.00 :•. ~ ;t .5 S=P=�' L.S.' @.100.00:= $ 100.00 TOTAL = $23;655:00' .: .ti 4'M1.:a II 1' :;—. _:,• 4.� + HUNT GT BEACH'PARK: ,- tN ON BEAC _ ,•fit: - =— .��.��_ := h4AIN'iENANCE YARD•:;:,' :* ., . . J µt3-"t ._.`_ - _ "- '—"=�`'%=• • ,,,,,'••• C)TY;C«HIiNTINGTOtiIFACN, rw•.e ., �): ---- - - rY.-..x's`l.:=t•+ . .. ....�5,+...'ti.= -14:•`C�'.t:'�.�.`"•:•�'.+i•+.._s�c--.•...ti;:b�..'-:._....... v,.'- 1 :.`i.`•"'•:•. ,. _ .L� � CITY OF HUNTiMGTO" BEACH f INTER-DEPARTMENT CGMMONICATION taxn�tow rucn , To Charles W. .'Thompson From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Expansion of Parking Spaces Within Date March 27', 1981 The Park Maintenance Yard FIR 1 81-36 in responsa,to� the request of: the Cnmmi+nity,Services Department -. 1. am hereby `sut z` mitting `a`Financial. Impact'..Repo"rt relative. to, tha 'requested: funding fcr-; 47ybce lot t�:.be const.ructed.within the existing Park/L andscape�Writenance Yard. : Should the City` Council, ba desirous o; funding this project, an appropriation,in the.'arraunt: -',': � • of.$x3.65S wi 11 be required. ,.:�.. Chief of Admini`stratiive `Sorvices RA/AR/cg �... _ -- - :'gs:jrr-;ir4•.S> , -r, .•/ +..«+.. ..rr•••...nvp •.r�i�`r}.�Li, .•yy.. Y • � - CiTY OF HGNTiNGTON BEACH J FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Expansian'df parking spaces within, the Park Ma10tgnance Yardd,,l;,_ Requested funding for'a 4*1 space parking lot 'to be constriicted within• Description . the'ex isting Park/l.andscape Maintenance Yard awn.. �+�:•r■ -- - -- Ail ' l. D 1 RECT PROJECT COSTS 1 .1 One-Time Costs an urn., ac Tt �AcqulsItion Constructlon' tins, f: ui menL Othi: ai `Cost It2 3 55 1 .2 Recurring Annual `Costs F .. r -^d7. •r" •r'1 d't:Y'+"g7!.!.n ......- .. Ii•i Additions Materials 6 Outside Pa ��rol l Personnel' ,`-Su 1 ies = Services ••• Reveilues - I�Tota ' Cost .4' 1.3 Replacement/Renewal Costs - N/A 2. . 'INDIRECT COSTS Undisclosed, expense of main6Ir'.I4ng i i's area in the future Including water/ electric utilities and basic maintenance. .i f •138fJ7w�e:5liftt)ir'.ww++r"""'_..... .- ,_»...--�.....-..�...�...�....-�...�- .�.+w.Qr.•...a.••...+..+.•�.-••....... --.»-_.�.�. ,- '.+.+.w.+'11•M.I V"."`a.++s•WIYN'itlj�Ej� h,¢q"p.r:...+. .r;y". ..i7"' .. . .. .• '.. 4..r-...vr:•�►l M1M'„^ .r,- n .'r: 't.' ,•,.;1*.++•wN.a++..r.�.•. ... «..... *i Finan .lal impact Repo •,, Page 2 r . 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A (r; 1+. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROH THE PROJECT ; would-help:�i leviate• the:frequent.pubt lc,parking. congestion,and - according tc r 1...........:...—.....,:..ram .....�...........:.......... �, r•¢he'Community:ServTces .Department a11oW..f6r the City employees-to have: better - t� ',,�I _ ..■rrwr� .�.� �.�r�rr��r - � .r..irr.n.■rrr�.w 77 %surveillance of their-•cars in this location. _ r S r .r■■rrrrr rr�rr rrrrrrr■ , r r■■ — r +I ' rn1 PROJECT USAGE r ` At s 'aI D?ij IV r•r' �:;►;=,: t. '' 6.' £XPENDIlUiE TIMING canmence with City Counci 1 approval. i k^. .. rr.rrr� r•r..rr• _.ar,rrrr rr r .r r-.r+r+�++. .�.�r�.� i�■�•rir�� 7. COST OP' y0T IMPLEMENTI NG THE PROJECT The fl Ip;side of 134,, plus the use of.these funds for other purposes. . . �;;; REt UE i F� CITY taUNCiL,.ACTION y Date June 5 '3.9B11 CQ Submitredto: The Honorable Mayor and City Council YLQV 0 Submitted by: Charles W, Thompson, City Administrator. Prepared by: Vincent G. Moorhouse, Director, Coimunit ervice .cs� { Subject: Block Wall Replacement - Beach Maintenan e Y Statement oi.luue,Rwomrmwdaflen,Analysis, Funding Sonroe,Aiternative Actions,Atta Jai rots:. STATEMENT 'OF ISSUE The block wall "at the Beach:Maintenance' Yard :is 'in need of rlacemen t`•� provide secur ty_.Against_ vandalism, -and._thef'.t_as_..h►oll,_as_a: sound- barrier,, RECOMMENDATION , Authorize t_he transfer of "$7_,580 frdm unappropriated: capital ,outlay budget.. jto the exist n 16,800�budmeted under.FY87.t82_Acrrount• #710902__f'o_r. a_total- d'of 2 , 0 for hh purpose_of replacing the present . i blcelc wa13. with'6,. cinder block. ANALYSIS At_,its�meet ng`'of Apr11`6 19$ , C 1 ouncil continued the its"sue: 'of replacing ,rthe,. six foot block .wall at the Beach Maikend ce ;Yard.with slump .stone:..at,. a.cost• of.i.$25;000. Staff was,:instructed,tor researeh', . the'.feasibllity of repairing t:he_.fence- as Well As oither.,=types: of. ,, " fencing: Public Workb 'Department sought. bids for repair of:'ther.wall and a?ternative.;'.fencing,. One b{d'. was received to:.r.eplace the block wall viith. six-inch cinder block at a ' cost of $24,3$0,• ,.One. bid was received to `repair. the cre'sent wall at a cost, of, $3.2,680. To replace the' wall .with chainlink fencing.would cost $5,50_ ,, The 'present 'block_wall, which is 'only •four •.feet hi,gli; in most places, was- constructed many.:years -ago.. . Th intent-.and..purpose, of, a new, higher.-'wall are' to provide. better, "s5curity..and.;alleviate..they iicise emanating from the;,maintenance yard,: ,..The Public Woiyks .Ergineer has. informed; staff' that anything,added. to: the present -.wall;.,.would.,:•not be stable :;or.*permanent.; A..chainlink fence: would not .be `acceptable ,or, compatible with the ''Driftwood Trailer park adjacent'• ubto ;the fac .lit y; nor ,.would it provide a sound barrier. Based on the,. Plie Works - Engineer's analysis, ,staff recommends anew, six-foot high, cinder block wall be constructed.. FUNDING SOURCE Capital Outlay - Unappropriated balance. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1) Replace wall with six-foot, chainlink fence with barbed wire' discourager on top. P10 4101 j�'j'S�SG2'.13'71+Y�* "^" nwrrr'«ww•w..rwwrau.oyypy;;,,;,,l,y+Rrw+wws..ar..+w .ww++oita,7Xitf: . .f A t44•"'],�,';:f.'.�: `t;{'`.1.. +! },.j�t..;i': ..'i�;':.4 t,.4t..fn•/!•f�t •'„t+c7t3+71�i . 'f1 . t .. r�"I:+wr:41i . .'•�a:i!'tr�� 2) Repair presant wall. - retaining four--foot heighth. 3) Replace block .wall with slump..stone as originally recommended at s cout: of $25 0 000. ATTACHMENTS "None. s{` t ,t •7, ,' ` fit. •'�• .tom_ ' •4. j .'i� 7 I t' t , � ... t_ .. t •'_� .t. .ram r ._I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted ncent G. Moorhouse Department Community Services Date Prep red , Marsh 182 „�, ,, , 19 81 Backup Material Attached Q Yes No %II Subject Replace Block Wall Fenca at the Beach Maintenance Yard. City Administrator's Comments Approve as Recommended. F` Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Sourco,Alternativc`Actions: STATEMENT'OF:ISSUE . ..r.'• t " '-,}`�3 .:. ` .r.. -_ w ?'!. ,.. - ".•s • r'.: ,.. Funds were approved;;i n..the:amount.:of. �16;800 to,.repl ace the`'bt ock:wall fifer, .e around the '- Beach;Mainte`hance_Yard•facility,that..separates::,it:from the`Driftwood"Trailer.Park and'the; Seaside _Vitl.age``codominium housing.-located, off Atlanta Street. When they low bid was, :returned,':the:replacement cost was �25,00Q; therefore, we need an .additional $8,200 to: : instal I .the:block wall. RECOMMENDATION ; ' Authoriae the transferof $89200 from Capital Outlay Acccunt 079907 to Account710902 r `for, thepitrpose of 'constructing the block,wal 1 fence. ANALYSIS ,In tg67+;the7Beach Maint n'ance;.tfard:was=.const"rutted: At:,that.timi`there"Was a four=foot., substandard fence surraundin�!then main`tanance;tyard:• -S,ince",1967'-.the.wal l has'-deteriorated j to the'pointi'th�t 'there'is,little. or,no_ security of, the Maintenance 'facilities: from Driftwood:Trailer;Park4nd`Seaside Village;, sections and blocks are missing from'tfie. fehce. We,:recominend'tl!at additional funds be transferred from Account 010907,'Pier Lighting Cony version Pr6ject:. The, Piers;Lighting Conversion.Prof act was approved, in_the Fiscil Year 1980/81`budget. In 1 ate:NdVW)er,',1980-we' were advi se'd E by..the:Pub1 ic;.Wo`rks Department .that t6.1convert' the ter(lights::from mercury vapor. to high :sodium deri ity would not. be.coat:effective.,;;Jt would take',the.'City a minimum.,of One ' .to amortize,aur.: investment.;.Simpson Stru.•tural, -, Engineering: Co;npany surveyed;-the pier .the'early 'p'art"of 1979 and advi'se'iI.. e. City ,that the ; pier structure was"detPriorating and.the pier should be. replaced. ,. The Public Warks Depart- : ' ment;is:researching the feasibility, oft replacing the pier within.the next few years... Therefore, we feel that'it isj.onancially advantageous to the City'to replace the pier lights •at' the time of the reconstruction. PIO 2178' t `i!':fY .V)as,44•-r'T12airiicrl�.A.:N.37crt«fRwrc:«:Ln:iar'.i. !i.[w....eo.r,u...:�a3..7: :.1',�'1:,;:..,t::'a...;:.r,r.l1...:k+.s.,r«w.u.iw a1-,L•^ +,�ti •r-+ +.. yf atiws' t r � t f , 1 Requesttlor City, Counc"il' Action . Re:`:` Replace Block Wall Fence Around the Maintenance Yard ;r 3/18/81 Page 2 r. ..r rx FUNDING SOURCE Capital Outlay Account #710907. ALTERNATIVE ACTION r..r Do notreplace the fence. Re get in Fiscal Year 1981/82. .Y. _n VGM MMB mcb Z i.. •+•�«••�•+•x...:crtill;,i{i;vc;:'.iG..'+'.ak.:r;:sLsa Sctrlt.a.ysks-s++..i+i ManutiaAA.rG+vtNi*,AV'.CL`i�r•ilidilf"A7efJ! "�tj,,�} `� t t f �J• CITY. OF HUNTINUTON BEACH t INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION • rru►tnncrcr��ucrr ,. To ,. Charles W.`Thompson From F. 8. ArguelId.. City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services , Subject 11epl3ncement of, Fence At Beach Date March 27, 1981 Maintenance Yard FIR 1 81-35 I ri , esponse`ao` the;request of'the Community Service's Department, i am hereby sub-'4' mitting'a Financiol� Impact'Repoit;rrel itivc:to: fun`ding.for•.�replacement:oF%fence at the; Beach. M.�intenanca Yard.%r:'Should tfie Cily;Counsi1; be:'desiro'us.of providing".;thel - additional ''funding;necessary,.for'the' completion of this:project, this'.can be,a"ccom� pi ished, by;.way-of-transferring a-portion of tho;available .funds that%had previously' been'set'aside but never,,used : In" 'the Capital Outlay budget for ;FY80-81 for�f'tiiQ.• . conversion 'of the*pier" )Ights'-to-high pressure sodium vapor.. A transfer, bf-:funds' in 'the' amount`of $8,200'wi I i be required. JVrw�l�t_• N yb4 lo Chief of Admini' ••stratiwServices' FBA/AR/Cg y i I t•�•ft t: ., t AI C I W OF HUNTrI NGTON BEACH FINANCIAL. IMPACT REPORT Project Name Reolaccment of fence at. Beach Maintenance Yard Description To authorize transfer of funds for purposes of accommodatlnn hIgblr than°or I'd inally anticipated contract bids for replacement of block wall fence at .�..�.__._I. .,..�.,..._ � _..� Beach Maintenance Yard. , 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 .1 One-Time Costs f : Land Furn., ac Acquisition Construction ties, E ui meet. Other Total Cost ' $ 8 200 1 18,200 • 1.2 Recurring Annual``Costs Additions . Materials 6 utside ..Payroll• -Personnel Su lies'- Services Rav nues Total .Cost 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs N/A w 2.' 1NDIRECT'COSTS Lessened funding capability should the Community Services: Department reverse iIs decision and go forth with pier light conversion- project. t infiR'i7'.fr.Ci:.F::u•.,.v,.Ki.w.rsr..+cwr.�.rr.v..�:',.e;:l:. .t'wYR •.I NIJ.:.a.r..l iYXSYLYLi.. ✓... r .. .w -� i• r, r .. ....t*.'. Financial Impact Report. :,� •f,� Page 2 .. • 3• NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A �. 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PR0JEC1' Allows for this `reviousl •ae roved-project, to be coqUmma d j "ROJECT'USAGE r. �Dai'1 4 60 EXPENDITURE TIMING Contract bid to be lot subject to City Council approval . COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT (1) Wall will continue 'to 'deter Iorate, according to the Community Services Dept. to as point where security of maintenance facilities is non-existent. '(2) Funds would be available for. use elsewhere. .M...—,..Yar...«,,, •a......+.ti-....�-r..—.r...... __•__"'__."'_---•....,+..r.+�-_.........�...._�.._... .,..........—.—• - •.--..w....o VwsLt.►:•�:a3.:+«i,:r.fF�7'..i�':t17Tu�•"'�'-. ., _ a... v V mu PeAmmm" CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH H�_v INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �n,Nrmcmv suc,� To Charles V. Thompson From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Replacement of Block Na11 Fence Date June i0,, i981 At beach.W ntenance Yard FIR 1 81-57 In:`rssponserto the request .of the 'Comnunity Services ilepartn�ent,, i am hereby sub--; mitf:ing.a Financial Impact..Report relative to the proposed transfer of appropriations withirf;ahe Capltel' butlay Fund..for purposes of provlding' the additional funding re- quIred for the completion of this project. bue 1-to;iha fact,that .the initlal `appropriation of $16;800 speciflcal1y:set up for this p'urposn. tn„'Account :710902 has proven to be ,1e55 than adcquate `to perform the block wall replacempnt, at "the Beach.Maintenance=:Yard, .a' transfer.*of`,57 560'will. be• . ,.necessary and may be:effected'through' a reduction 'In•the'"previousl"y-approved:though _ `unencumbered appropriation balance in Account' 710907 n allow for the e'% d 'infustcn of funds. ' ra fund'.balance :n the Capital. 0utiay Fund will be $265,4t 0 after this transfer. i'. B. Arg ello 't Chief of:Adminlstrative "Services FBA/AR%cg 1 .rti/A:'fSCI.+nr7',ui'a.e(✓.ItE:.:ri.'+.uY�N.Hv.a'1rKL:•=..GY..:�4t1:x•.«..+«.••..,nMv+.•.r.:...C. p ,. ;; r y'.,. � t� � ' �, •.i f 1'w_! + �J} •A a l� ;r'f.'fit � ;,+. + V..A� t+,._ f t+i �` �w!, ..: ti. � t +, ("r rJ Y+ i*ri'�v�• ,+;1: f +'. ;'� ` r > F r + f a r,•I �7 `.S �� t i i �..V,r..¢ ;r p r rp . i { ,r �' .r'� " �t r, iy "t'/ � +•�1 11 ../� y I4 +r�.�. ; �r *; _ .�:Sr i>'�� .j� � � s,/ y}� rtJ.,Cy ;�i/�' f�.. r. 4�•J�(.:iM�+, +� 't�tf• •J, x �i�►.�7 >'��..�+'irLt �t.' t ,{�. .fl L- ( s k Iy� .kd c.•�,.*. y� i,. s ]�{1 .Ji+. •;.I �. .'�"b�� y�f�{"'�rs! ,fi"' '•?�J� :�. 7..�� '�,. ��f,�.;f f:� fit' �'A1,.iS,ff' ��'.#+� t•F �ytis � 1.��",r.�`�� `?Tk?fK,�ys�Js ��lt�'r s}l�' f� rta'�7 ;'��. Y. Y}e)':yrr �/,�`i' �yA .r.'r�i: ,�'w{.�fr �.',1.1. ,.,r�. .y+� tJ� -� �r Kr � ��'4°}�,I j+.rr ••��'r.�•�, { � tl,�`r��'tt"' '�� } IF ��+�:��jj,��,..,F.ti� ��'�•}��a ��,�r ° �ii��"�' �ri..t +rt :k � �e. f :1 1,�r� li. ��. '�ly� •'�+v 1� �.� 1 j-;" y�"C:. t y" �.aj�j� '�1 Tom. r!�t�.,,f �,I'ri�''�'. �J�ff .� +�� f' �,.}� � .. + i��rryry+ >w I.I '� '1if" / .7 L;�I A..ZF+ .rti � ��•7 rY .1 7'�w f. {v Q�..f V. ��•y �� (�,y� �" }y ''� kh �t!ff'��f,} C�r %�j lc'� �. � i� � _.�"� �r'; ''r�k��'� ! �rA�1;'YCIr� 'S1��'I.t�� r ��t�i �i�� ' i��'�l�'t'H� N'�#�• hi�y81:.'�� .FrT; ✓</7+ ': J� j• �{V,I „/ d /� ') f � � ,� r ��i..f�f {" �� 1L /�� 'S f 1t, s ��' Sr � r v 3.E � rl 1 �I, +�r �' '�"�' q �:� ��,� ,��'7� �� . i..�,�� ,>� � r�j `�.',°4�' , t1' • .� e.`�,� �„r. `eta-;��1�1`I a,�,dy�C1�� ,��'�� ,�! a'xx" !� fi Yr� � �! �. +� �!�� /♦�c. j rl� � 'i'�y 'tt`'}� {'/f��"�� Y�A «;�;'�i �+t�4- ,rsa� X+I �� +r 1r:r )t.?'l�l..".w Yf•flM�I;a1ly, �l.r rF rhy ?ti'`�4/ 1,�t.R.Y.��1.15'). ,iri;+R„�.•�l+',Il ii�I./t•SG�P'.'.I SV.��/�'�A l:+ r i t�`f�^/' iillt l4 � hJ. r i t't .� a � 1 t ! � 7►�'3.� rat/.'Y'1./'li�.I r{� s� 1'f�l"9�G.•.:rN, �,., 1:� r 1 1 i • . • : • IRWIN 1 1 1 1 s Yiil..l• , • wJrYi- 1 • • . EFIM1 • t -mi 1 1 . A f, Financial Impact Report y Page 2 ,• 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A A. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Allows -for-this previously approved project to be con.'umnated. $. PROJECT USAGE Daily. i 6. EXPENDIiunE TIMING f Contract bid -to be let subject to City Council approval . y. COST OF NOT AMPLEMFNTING THE PROJECT (1) Wall will continirn to deteriorate, according to the 'Commun I ty Services Dept. to a pointwherc� security of Maintenance facilities Is non-existent. (2) Funds would dbbe�available for use elsewhere. } +w+....wia:L.:x�la:.7Ji•S1xx.4+tlr...w.............,......_._._.._�_..�........ ..._._.._... . +.,, . y�� A:�ss..*.c-:y�•.::+::xair..+I.II'1YciYi.'•• � I�iI�d9�.7iJfylWVMYA' y "" - -.I..iI.1J::;N�..T!•"•yy.•r- 9j�,] I••• Ali L'!1 RE UEg FOR CITY COUNCI ACTION Date May 27, 1981 `7 Submitted try: Honorable Mayor and City Council 1I �: Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator y_ • Pepsred by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: 1981--1986 Capital Improvement Program :• z ,8tetement of Issua Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: OAC- STATEMENT OF ISSUE*,. .,. '�° • 1 The staff as compld' a comprehensive five year'Capital Improv ent Pzograru '(C..I.P.) for the- City and is requesting Council approval to u ixe the -docu ment as a guide for the implementation of the City's Capital mprovement Program. c RECOMMENDATION: Authorize t e .City staff to use the 1981-1986.C.I.P. document as a guide for - mplementing" the City's capital improvement needs. ANALYSIS:`',`°} , .Introduction', In a.cor ance-with the city's commitment to .provide ard.maiatain essential publ.ic.•-'ficilities, the staff-has designed .a 'five"year,,-Capital• Imps ovemerit' Program.. , For programming purposes, a five year planning period was deemed most suitable. •• ';3:} . •heb:k�T. 4 'The=:program,, is'.a comprehensive listing;;ofw needed capital,'improvement•sjoi fisca].ears' 1981 through 19"86,`and: ificl`u'des ;by definition 'ary mayor projects requiring the•;expenditure of public funds over; and ,above annual operating expensea. . Items commonly' included are` the'.construction and .replacement of community 'facilitie' s such: as "public buildinga, .stieets,- bridges", sewers,, , storm drains and :parks. Capital, outlay items, such as autim' iles`, mainten- ance. vehicles and office equipment are not included. PLIy Ol3E3 r T .. pr-mary.'purpose of: the C.I.P. is to provide a planning•,and'"'budgeting . document that will assist the Council and staff, in .the consideration-;and' priority. of,_capital improvement .needs. Therefore, the document is designed asIL:a •tool;'to be used for ,implementing -the, policies 'and identified needs l con-- tained within the recently adopted Community Facilities Element 'and related master plans. The -C.I.P. will be refined and updated annually to the extent that: 1. .The 'list and costs of proposed Capital improvements for a given :year will match the items and expenCitures listed in the City's budgetary document for the same year. 2. The .Planning, COmnil?sion can review -and approve, at one-'*time, ' all,'proposed capital improvements for an::upcoming fiscal year. (Current.ly, projects are brought before" the commission on an individual basis for. review and ; approval.) ` t P10 4181. y.i.a.l i."1 ..T`yar�'.n.i'.iyt�a`.1. il�p1 f...�. .. ..,tf`..Y L.........r1 "i.: w.♦ . ' .... 'c t "' 1 -::•.�.•,..r,: 1r.pnry�+Y A �11 {.ti• .t `•I..4t. •n,. %x,, ...r+.% i•..W.-:r• � J'+ �. (.'( '! Request for Council Action 1981-86 Capital Improvement Program May 27, 1981 Page 2 Format Ti�Fe.C.I.P.,; document istdivided into five .sections. Section one Is,an introduction to the program, followed by a listing and- explanation.'of, funding sources'.in section two. 7: definition, of the,five departmental areas,"' submitting C.'I.P., request, and ,'a summary of. total ,project costs ` is included in section three while section four details the five year project list for each department. Section five, the Technical Appendix, outlines the procedures for adding to and deleting projects from the C.I.P. Fundin, Source: Not app ca e. ;Act on: Deny_..approva o the C.I.P. and direct the staff to develop another guide for implementing,'the City's improvement needs. . Attachment: .'; .. 6 C.I.P.. Document .' PEC:DRN:jy •►Y�yyr�saus•w++ ap.::/Lr.'li i.'..:r.'it.ti a8.•ad':ra1S6-•..+�y;+•w. .:>:1 ' �� fir.. 1 ak:.'9i• iy' � 'r Y.^tt+ is .�' ;`'<.: .> .+�, is J,;3 - .. �•+E�",F:*i`..•r�4fi.}'•�r'�fi • .!i � :'III lip . HeINTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Charles 'W. Thompson From F: B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Requested Authorization for:Funding Date June 10, 1981 of•Chainlink Fence-Around The Proposed Expansion of the City's Landfill Area FIR 1 61-58 In response,to-'•the`request of the Community' Serv1"cesDepartment;`=I�;bm hereby1' submitting,a:Financial,Appact Report relative 'to the`proposed funding fr the installation,of'•a. chains ink'fence'to•encompass they proposed-expansion of'the,Ci ty's, . i, landfill faci.lity.' An a'pprop:rlation. in. the amount of: $14;982 wlII 'be'''required should the City.'Council choose.'to provide funding, for this'-protect at this tune. it ;;. appears that these costs may be reimbursable via application of the *SB90 program." Sufficient.'funding is,avallhble lh' the Park Acquisition and Development Fund for such purposes. AWaffirmative-response,by the. City:-Councii•will� reduce the balance In the Park Acquisition and Development Fund. to $2;376,941 Chief of Adminlsfrative' Services FBA/AR/cg u..w r.r..w �;..krwr+ wr.w.�..r..aAa.«y.....w a.V• ow.�....a•......ve-.,....o..s..a '-' .a..• •.. 14:iF.a t.%•J.i^►«':.,..�.:.+.:... tier'.f,.:.:lJ • J. ' - +tit=:r+i'.::{.'.:1.�•:.Ise.%r.vM•Y�i'44�7��t�1J7'��$Miw 4..tr:.E•�'S.s p7f7s` d r r rr I' '� r* r Ixt�wi,..: ry,.•�rpF, r. 6-'e.� }., �r°� '� r -�iij �i-r�.t'�.1'.J�,r�!'A r� •' jc1''' 'rrn r,.rf.7 .T� '' 41�.•'I{`, �r'�r.rN,fi.>1 ha a a 1•1�AIR yr^� r+••f,' #!/ r• f, *aL., :�a,,., ir,, h J � . .e r} fM/F1.,.(r ',�•tyh, ;k..trlrrf;ijl � ,�p:�<+�:C.I }}�ftr � 1 'ryi.r!i Err. rfi t e r :w -ilj ••�.�' JI',1 :� {'/' ri.'�. /*4t 1'..�j• +� r Y 1 r.; !',S} t �j- �t„/Y`4�a Y•w�-'Y ,i.^rL ,� R' :'4r r{ry'-h'}_ •�*�.1.t,+•�C.,rfip., lY} :. r., �,.. tse l.�r � �.('{Y � y;i:,C,h,�r J „�'�S r7.aS• .r a? .�. F�' ,,r/ R ,ff� t r �Cti�+•,;i t a f r �1' �t.��'. 1 r r .�.i'.a tt•, •,r►4...4,`f` 'tr;rtr i .:1; ,rr•+Ut;.?+, •i . �,r? •�Ct.... i.:lC fdr�,. i ' �` fr'. 1 aia S' rr+F �`, I ;';r' /.o r ,-f r� i �/�G'_�: ,�� .y�; !•,i¢.l+y-'; '.� !r eja�(.��r t'}�,,►�,;;��`;R'I JI��j}. �'.'r�If, !'�; Y; P,rf�"1;��.r. rS,:• +f °* y7�F`'J�1�;'fj}`?�,•P,fa�'v,I;?..,/' �ty��>�:�i'�,.rM�.�f f�;..v+(��.r1v.`'�`';• �l3tL} dr} d'l n .l�!�7/ a a,xlr+��,r� r F:•f C; �i '� i, .[•J / rf { f ! � .•rj+7)�t a �Yr�.>�,, I r � "�(f� iy�. r L,r�k� 1'rr,,55y�.�• .-�,}�,1� REy •�i� r�.w�S � j .�!1�1 1� �.'1n�I��`/�.`•ti�j�'1,• r�r(/y1{yil4�i�� ••f�4'.,'Y�r"v'f4?,f r. ,f ; ��Y�i if"�J � �177'��y��rt;'� ,}�•.�I��y II�F *�^ I)-j)�,}, ;:r.,(I yc..!t .. .« ,�,...tr! 1 �fy / * {•Ylra % �!'�tlr,( : afi,'�� 4"'` � • .F7„!^ ,y 1.f�f 17,• / ' ;'� �. r ', SSSfi'� tr' ".('1�" �F��1�1fl�;f•�, `�: s. } r YW�L�y��i��`��ftfS�Y' �F{t al�tf�;r�F ��r l�r'J`.q��){i� ,7{'FL,,W� rGn 4+��+ /t/�j1,'( )}h�"}if,I � y� p li(,� d� }fr�s,� ,�+f r'•7�n..�.�y1��(P �yl )�}Yj:..,t Y�f'AiL 4#` rf,I it a•c; rJ) +] �� P. �.Y Y^S t,"+r jr)l rll ii° qj�'k"7�//+ 1, h'�'•7.Lr1.;L�Jr�•!'+tr1 'err +�fiY+`rr�'1tt f .} t }'�PE�� .;St +./�1lr:fi�!7f rr. r."l��'S L'3�':f�d", �i� r`.rt#.t,r�a Y {- f (..�A'�,�'.�Y ✓Y'w tiC- �q �'. 1 1 • 1 ' 1 • • • • • MEN • • • • ' 1 1 t - fit• . � - � ;. - Financial Impact. Report , - Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A ..._,_ ._......__....___ —_._..._.._._.__.� .._. 4. BENEFITS TO 6E DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Acc�ordin to�the. reg+uesting department, the State.af California.andOran e ^ t ± , . • `County-SolId Waste Mana�ement•Agency mandate the:.lnstallatior► of'the structure f the .City decides t`'i o gci forth yn' the prapasad expan'sion.of. the area`. S. . PROJECT USAGE F` ({[ 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING ,Contrast' for fencing to be lots bsequent to Cfty Co6ncil`'approval... �. { 7. COST OF.HOT iMPLEIIENTING THE PROJECT �. City may he precluded from taking up the expansion question altogether. • is REQUES i FOR CITY COUNC9LACTIO / / /PLP June. •-�'''• �((�A�-pip by 1 Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Subb6ifted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administr or FPrepared by: Vincent G. Moorhouse, Director, Comm ;icy S �x - Subject: Installation of Fence around Landfill Expansion Staormtnt of twua,Reoornat t�aa�,�. Sw+rr:e.AFtrrtwtiw Actiocs;Attaftwte: STATEMENT OF ISSUE In acci�rdar_ce,with plrsns to expand the Cityls Landfill, enforcement agencies require a Bix-foot fence around the facility. RECOMMENDATION AutYiarixe. the.. Pubile Works Department to .enter, into a contract with August Fence:CompF.n;� (lowest bidder) for the. installation.`of a six- fG�t , chainlink fence' for a total;.amount of: #14,982, -and `•approve trir. fer. .of'. $14,982. from Park Acquisition and Development -Fund to Account 790767', Central Park, Other. ANALYSIS On er."l?, 1980,;..tho, City Council', approved the'<'negat;ire, dcalar3� t.ion;,required.by the;-ball "Regioiial :Water.Quality, Contirol', Board for .the expansion:of the:;City's Landfill' from: the•.Library `to ,Qoldenweat and Telbsrt: Streetis;Fto :the,:;Police Heliport:. Ttie: State :oP;,Califoriiii . and' the,'Orange_ County"So11d Waste':Management`Agency.require; a i.aiic ;toot fence around .the proposed expansion:... The preeent,.Landfill'.site is already fenced Augast. Fence 'Company was low�biddb' at. #14 982,; with A' l Fence Company bidding #15,656 and Industrial 'Fence & Supply' it $169366. � .� FUNDING) SOURCE c: Park`Acquisition and Development Fund, balance as of June 9, 198ii- $2239119?3. ' 'ALTERNATIVE ,ACTIONS Y) Do. not install the- fence and continue filling on the present land.. fill:.area; ` 2) Reapply for the expansion after the present landfill. area is full.. ATTACHMENTS 1) Map showing existing landfill area and propotsed area; 2) Approved negative declaration N80•-40. :._... ..._. .-....-......w..,..w+rasy>—wv.�r.F:11J.....w i.Y.'.: .e.:i..K•f...is t.Y.•ly.w.v.r...raa....s....+h,.s.�•rx/:C:i....1.1«'kiJj:.71+� Y'i ti:i:IrL 1:�.� f ' � t - ••••�'��• ZONING JAN DM '39 P L(- 110 [ lAL DISTRICT MAP wif `` • AIIMN• ANMr • ,yr hoT9 w " M vow r/•w•..M••/•.•/1• •••J pl• ••w•(1, Aw•prt H tN •. ••• •••N.•l Ir �:•• M •_•� •• //M 1 h•w1r /1•/ry ` CITF J NTRN 1 rl .i��#• aL��-� i: w �•i •• jw 1 iPw-/.MN N •••/•{.• •• •M- •/91 NNw• /•v 4► IIANG. . ♦•f)llI`•II1r� �I.• 1/1 �'// ��/��l• �+i•' w• •I� /M ;• � M••.M/MYt.•I.-• �• • .,. 1 11 •rM..•/....www•w••t/r/.1 t AMi toot[) w lllflt CAt+L' i �y •�:.: '.'. ,.•1 .r-0/w•rw . r• Y ..•-•.r t w•r•IN_w•r•.•..••• ..•M OF•/!•,1N NL/Y.M/,N•,q1•�N/I{CtN •, • t /%••w.1IY • ••►M••Y,r1•."r"••AI/• .sr ••• !•�//•,•!It•f,•Nd11�•r•1.M•/I,N•11,••fl.lr•4M f/•II•M.N•I,rI�1r•1•. •w� •• ••ten•rr •n a,rt N,l/•t.q�r{al►t{l�glltllf/=Lq/INANAJ/N=.Nlt�r•LI►JMfJ/!►t4 L..I;....r •..w• w ..• • ' ' arev•t. •NI ...t�l t*A/ +.._��rr r rm. • - ••�_..•.+; � r• 11.11 M /r/•�Yw/1 t.. ....r • � •I r/ M J � w•w••r•1 m1_0 its I.. . H, 'i R2 oil RN o am 0—�•�/aArf'J LE4�l/D�� WA (R)i4f-PDCF- DMI-A CF=R C2 f 11" I nl M i w� �• Cif—C YI �I •�' 111 AI f,.j».. • ! it .P••�•• � RI �As;� �� 111`• ,.1!I I•: tr ail t ...1 ��• „ If �.; � at coi "Art f _� Ri i' .r% *�~ fM itie• ., A ~� f ' MI-0-CD ,r•: ;. ; RA-0-CD' on r tI 1 MI-� PA-0 .. as awn Ipfr 1 ns [s I\i4i � e/1n1U I 1+1•��A1 lN�t.I1Mt. •. i 41r b tlf r. 11 1 •• ........ '1 1. ..._ ... "'1 •'11 !"�•"""1 1-'... t ��r �.� 1....•_..._. 1 1 % r . _ ..__.. ._.•-_._•._—^.•-_.'__.__.---._....�..-.......•..++....w.:.'.i.. c.,.i'....,u.ti. ........_....••n.ww•+.._. ...r...rs•xu:il::iKW.�Ji%«'s;,:•ti.::ii'i'n`�1 :�'wltili': l� REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ' Vincent 0. Moorhouse `!��m�tted by 1]apartmen3 - -- Carnmt tv .ci -t'.y..'. . .. ~iM• D-ite Prepared llovembe'r• 7 , 188U Backup M"kl Anacl-.ad E] Yes 0 W iut,jC'Ct fJEOATIVE!DECLARATION 1180-4 0 n g,X,j!AN51QH OF EUEiur, t.AHnE,M. OPERATION City A.dminit;ttRtO[.'�l Approve as Recomipended -- Stster"M of ion, ReawwroWnian," sis, Fund frig Source,Aiternttive Actiam: STATEMENT OF ISSUE A.',negative- declaration.is requi iired by the Cal ifornla Regional, Water Ruality: Control board for the expansion of the city's Class III, : • °•.✓ landfill operation located at the southwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Cothard Street. RECOMMENDATION Approve Negative Declaration 080-40 ANALYSIS Ott.5ep ember 28,; 197,g...a permit was issued. Uy. t:he' Calllfoin'li Regional Wareto"ijtialit+ `Control'' Board for:. the city,,',land f ill; operation. ' A.. st•conil...applicatibW'has`been filed for. the., expanRion,of the' .:landfill l.0 Ooldenweat Street which requires. CouncI approvil. of a, negatiire . ,t,�c;laration'. ..-The. landfill is: being expanded to build a satisfacory �layer of', Clsse. I1I material , which Is concrete, - As phalt; sand,..,dirt :ittd t avel, over an area .which has been used�'aa a .trash landfill. :c l t.-• 1'ot- suva•ral.;years The placement of Clans Ill material will 11rov Ide.. a more substantial base for the' proposed development of 111iit4ingt.ott Central park. (See map attached. ) r FUNDING SOURCE $100'permit fee.- Park Acquisition and Development Account. AGTLItNATIVE ACTIOfJS Do not approve the negative declaration. . --....�.�.�._,-...._. .�....._-�.. ...�..�. ,---......�+...... •....a.;.e..-,e..r......u. .-:o.-...�.nr.leC..e...►w•+...rr.�.....,n„a ' • '. .. 2 CITY OF NUNTINGU.. JEAGH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPASTMENT P.O.Box 100 Huneirgton Bemh,CA.92M ...".�.•.,..,.,« . Tel: (714)SM271 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Fee - $75.00 FOR CITY USE ONLY _Department of.Comoun_,t,t� services Date" Ater;it cart[Ate horized Agent ReceiveA: Project Numbers 2000.Hain St reel. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Department of Origin: Mailinv Address � 4,536-5486 other Applications or , telephone Permit Numbers• City,of___,Jr ygtfngtnn Beach I'r•onCrty Owner 2000"Mani 5tre3,t •714 536-5481i �. M.i i ] i nu Jtddress Telephone 1,i-o"'ect information . (please attach Plat Plan and submit ' Pfiotograpfix of subject property) %a . 1 N_aftire- of Project: Give complete description of the piropased j r)KO�-ct. To expand the area of the.Huntington leach Public Landfill site: Type br " materials will be Group III only, asphalt, concrete, sand, gravel and. dirt. 1 •� t .. l.osr_at inn of Pro'ec.t. QAddress neatest street intersectionac) Goldenwest and -Talbert. 1 . I Assassor's I'rt«= -1 Nttmber: `- - --.......`-.__ .._.,_._»_�..,._......,,,,,ac....,y.u...f:....:w.'...---- ,'-'..+w.r'.' ...�...r..+�.«.s..rN.ts:�.r.�u/aIRtI.iC.�'f •'••, •. 1 S a• i/..cc REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 2, 1981 Submitted to: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: CHARLES W. THOPYSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Prerzmd by: VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE, DIRECTOR OF COMipJNITY SERVICES ra "jact. INSTALLING NEW 5 000 GALLON FUEL TANK AND 250 GALLON WASTE OvAL TANK UNDERGROUND AT THE BEACH MAINTENANCE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 00 / Backup Material Atu dwd: [A Yes [ ]No 4 g a9 Statemio i of Issas,FlecommendatIon,Analysis.Funding Source,After ccrY ct.cxr STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Funds were approved in the amount of $15,000 in .this years budget to replace.,our existing aboveground diesel and waste-oil tanks with. larger tanks underground.. However, in securing bids,.:the tow bid was $17,900 to install the tanks and provide 'the'necessary equipment to operate— , the ,tanks. -Therefore, an additional $2,899 is needed to'complete this project. EM ENDATIONS: Authorize the transfer,of,$2,899 to Capital Ourlay Account 171T-903 c has a present balance of $15,000 and award the putcii«se"order to G-H Maintenance Company,to install the tanks for a total sum of $17,899.00. ANALYSIS: �:We have.been utilizing a- 500.9allon tank abovegound fore 4s thtorage o ese ,:fuel and 4'50'gallon barrel for waste oil. This system'does not,,- , conform.with City fire codes. The Fire Department has�advised'us o',have tanks Instil-led below ground to meet city.codes. . In addition; weyould`Ancrease-,a.,. our usable surface;.property<by.removing the existing tanks,along..with iemovin;l an.unpleasant'•eyesare far. the adjacent property owners at the Driftwaad Trailer• Park and Seaside Village condominiums development. FUNDING SOURCE: Capital outlay unappropriated fund balance..- ALTERl1ATIk-AC'TIONS: Do not install underground tanks and continue to'use the ( . present storage tanks. I no=I "�;"`,','�},(��{l:rt:Vt4+C',i.G'Wr4i(f1::etul::•�rusou..n««..swaw..:+++ir..•.aaw.x...i.:fw'3.isiSaLs•.L�Ka.`---------•V----••••..•.•..+ tv. r^+- z�;iaa•.s:�:.,..+:..•.:rsrr i•s.,ah�;r y,�lS'. 7 r t i+ c::� Contract/Proposaa� CONT.UC.# 27n97 G. W. MAINTENANCE, INC., r•;,.i.AttiltcttA."tt:1~lt1t: FA .' 1061 EAST SIXTH STREET • SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92701 P.O.box 102,. ' PHONE:(714)542.8726 • (213)435.3934 SAHTA lrte?Pw l:Jt.92711 I .. t4tte+ntinn: . Rich AnTrril PROFOSAL StlBUITTED TO PHONE PATE City of Huntington Ocach / Harbor. 1. Beaches • 53G-5221 3-9..3-ft STIRFET Jots 1"E 44 Huntington Ave. / P.O. Box 70 f CrrV.STATE AWD ZIP COVE r. JOB LOCATION Huntington Ceach, Calif., 92648 We'-pr opbse to furnish 'ali necessary labor, materials, equipment and permits to install a net-+ 500D gallon Joor-"Plasteel11 underground storage tank for diesel fuel end a 280 Mallon Joor , a •• , Plasteclu underground tank for waste oil. The above auks,aru'to be fu pished and installed in accordance with your Fire Dept. , tr abo t regulations,:inclWing' all necessary piping, valves and fittings. concrete work, asphalt '- paving, electrical, pump work and clean up. ' Due n the locale of this instal7atinn, vrrr still he recuired to have hater for ballast'insidey ' the tank to kcep i t from floatinq away during construction. , Therefore; we are requesting ,� that the City,. will provide a water true: or fire hose to fill the tanks at our direction: 1, , UNDERGROUND 000MCTION CLAUSE. ' CL W.Mawenance.Inc.assumes no responsf'aitrty:er underground obstruction such as sewer lutes,water tines,electrical lines which may be broken under excavation unless we are provided with an accurate drawing of said underground obstnx;liorgs]before job is started.in oo event of said 1 obstrtrctiorts being damaged during excavation,:wairs tail!be bitted as an sutra item. _ to W4 Propose hereby to furnish material and tabor-Complete in 3CCOrdance with above specifications, for the sum of; . _ sEvpntpen-Thausand. Ci^_ht-ltundred flinek-tuna XX%XvxXXXXXXKXXXXY t sty 17,'199.00 PAYMENT TO BE MADE AS roll owe IN FALL UF011 CG'lPLETI0f1 ' Alt inat srral Fa pwrxrleed to tie a socaled Alt wok to tra raonroleled M a workrnar+�ur ell 0. TENA nuns accordaq to stsrdsrd padice,Any attention nr deviation from abort spent Authorize r • ` ticatians Invotw0v extra costs w+tl be exerutN only upon written order,and wig T , �Ctlnn 4, L+eearneantrtyeharyeererAlyd2boneMeesUmare•AAagreementseontw;rrupon Signatu _ H�SOT'— strlkos,accidtnb or de"txyaid our control Owner to carry Ire.tornado arrl other J necrsss w ry Inranc m Our workers are fully covered by wonunen s Compensstion �' - fw This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 37 day.. i`. Acceptance of Propose!—The above prices,spectirations signature and Contditiors are satislatory and are hereby accepted You are authorized to do the work m speclled.Payment will be made as outlined&:tare. Signature DATI:OF ACCEPTANCE "NOTICE TO OINNER"ON REVERSE 510E MUST BE READ AND SIGNED. .�....._.� �..►+......��+..•.. ..v-�.. ...+w.�.+wyN1..I..JwN w1I:.�rw•++�. +•..w..rw/,,,4 W/,AY,.M-��.M 63Ty;;• ,Jat,rrtsV t r� • f _ NOTICE TO OWNER The taw requires that,before a licensed contractor can enter into a contract with you for a vrork of improvement on your property,he must give You a copy of this Notice- Under the mechanic'lien laws of the Slate of California,persons who help to improve your property and are not paid have a right to enforce their clam against your propeftY This"cWnC is known as a macchhanWs lien.Basically,when someone fifes a mechanic lien,he is making a claim on your property as security against payment of a just debt In other words,this law allows contractors,subcontractors•laborers,materialmen or certain others who may have provided goods orservicos to place a lien on your home or the structure they built or improved for you for any unpaid portion of the goods and services they f umish.For example,if you fill to pay your contractor,or 0 your contractor fails to pay his subcontractor or laborers.at neglects to make required contributions to a trust and/or other funds(where applicable),then tnose people can took to your property for payment,EVEN IF YOU HAVE PAID YOUR CONTRACTOR IN FULL There area number of ways to protect yourself and your property at the onset of contracting and throughout the construction project You might. , for instance,request that the contractor furnish you with a payment and performance bor.4%This Is a dif f event bond than the one currently required by Contractors!License Law.)The additional cost is usually minimal and is a certain guarantee that the project will be completed and the bills paid.You may also wish to record this payment and performance bond and file the contract with'te County Recorder to further protect yourself from anyone Gening your property.It you do have a contractor provide a special bond on your project and the banding company does not honor your claim promptly ki the event the contractor defaults.you may wish to contact the California Insurance Commission to see if the bonding company is engaging In an unfair clams practice. • Anotht:*avenue available to you Is to use a funding control Company.The control company acts as a third party,disbursing all funds for payment and usually sesxrring all the necessary releases of liens.A funding control comparry is a specialized construction escrow which makes payment directly. to subcontractors and suppliers.By doing this,it affords additional protection against valid liens. Should you choose not to rise the above.the following are some of the important time requirements you should be aware of regarding the mechanics'lion lawn 1. PRELIMINARY NOTICE. A cafrrant,contractor.subcontracts+.or malerialman Is entitled to enforce a lien only if he(lives the preliminary twenty(20)days notice.H applicable,All claimants,other than the originaltaoritractor(the person you contracted with),ora laborer performing actual labor forwages.must give this notice_Therefore,people%tto you may not even knw,such as a subcontractor,or a material supplier,must notify you that they are pruviding supplies or services to your property which may later create a lien.This Preliminary Notice must be given no later than twenty120)days alter the claimant has first'urn'shed labor,services,equipment or material to the job site. If you get such a Preliminary Notice,do not be alarmed The notice is Intended for your protection so that you may then retruireyour contractorto ' furnish you with an unconditional Gen release prior to or concurrently with payment to him. 2. NOTICE OF UECHANICV LIEN. Usually claimants must record a Notice and Claim of Lien within ninety(90)stays of We completion of the work tl a Notice of Completion.or a 14otice of Cessation of Labor has been recorded,then the Mechanics!Lien must be recorded within sixty(60)days by the original contrador and within thirty(301 days toy all other claimants such as subcontractors,materfalmin,etc The caimanls must indicate on the notice what Is owed to them,This Gen vritl now b nd your property like a mortgage or trust deed 3. CCOAPLAINTTO FORECLOSE A MECHANICS'LIEN. lithe Claimants'demands are not sztisfied.then they must usually file suit within ninety(90)days after the recordation of a Notice of Mechanics' Uem The complaint to foreclose the lien Is filed in a regular court proceeding and fellows in a similar manner.YOU SHOULD Bic AWARE THAT YOUR PROPERTY COULD BE SOLD AND THE PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE USED TO SATISFY THE CLAIM. 4. NOTICE OF NON•RESPONSIDIIJTV. You can protect yourself and your property from a valid claim of a canto actor,or subcontractor who is doing work on your property.but not at your request(for example if you have a tenant who has contracted for work to be done). You can do this by posting and recording a Notice of Non• Rrn:ponsibility.The nctice must be posted in a conspicuous place within ton(10)days after you have obtained knowledge of Iho work You must thou record the notice at the County Recorder's Office.You can usually purchase this form(run various sources. 5. UNCONDITIONAL LIEN RELEASE. You may also require that the original contractor provide you with unconditional lien releeses signed by each and every person who has perform-ad any work or labor as well as every person who has delivered any materials to your Job.Be cure to get releases from each poison who gave you a Preliminary Notice. e. NOTICE OFCO0.tPiinON. The owner of the proper ty or his agent(som%times the general contractor)can record a Notice of Completion within ten(10)days following the actual completion of the work of impraiement The effect of the Notice cN::orupfetiori Is to shorten the time porlod within which the contractors or subcontractors may file their Mccbani&Lien. The above is not meant to be an exhaustive review of mechanics liens•It is intended that you understand that you are entering into a contract which may bind your property and it is intended that yo.i::-n�.trstand have to act to protect your properly. Read and acknowledged. Signature Dated i r• 7••r. .........., w.r...........�.—.- ..-«.,........... ..... .__._..,,....—...«:w ..i .. .«..«a...r..tr-w2i...xw...»..:,,:.a.�:,riNi Ql:l u7.t.Ar:."tir�:M4AM1:P'+Mr1 ]i'NsNd'llr:.k,..•a.M'..41L1. .-..w...a•t.w..-.....�.•++ r 4 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Installation of underjround fuei tanks at Beach Maintenance Yard Description Request -for additional funding to accommodate higher than anticipated bids on replacemenc`of'dlesel and'water oil tanks. 1.- DIRECT PROJECT COSTS !.1 One-Time Costs _ Land, urn., ac . t Acquisitton Construction ties, E ui merit ' Other Total- cost : f 2VB99 21,899 ' 1.2 Recurring Annual' Costs ! . Additional. Materials s utslde Pa roal' Personnel' Su `lies Services ,Revenues` Total"Cost ,.�. 1.3 Replacement/Rene"al Costs NSA r i 2- INDIRECT COSTS Passibl,a savings that could accrue `throw h'utilixing r4nds prevtcus� a Y pprooriated thoughgh u�___ nspent.for this particular purpose, that might otherwise be commiited .,.....ed to a:w ro ects unforeseen at the time_ the funds were originally set aside.' • ;y T1.41C5filiCt.Www+anra.w..+.r•..+..••+.�._ �-..`_�_._�.. , '-'•rr•+Irv+w;,,«..r:.:{.•.rr,.vw.+—"".""•�+r+s'+rw►•.saeq[•ivn.rx��4t.�.R?lPwt1.W4f'lKhbs'�*rrS�C'4�t�:,;".. - - 5 f• � f ff t• 4' t �� Financial Impact Report Page 2 ' r li 3. HON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A k. . BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Allows for the awarding of the contract to be conswmmated. p PROJECT USAGE Dal ly �1 6.. EXPENDITURE TIMING „rr _eUjjhase_of tanks and-their installation will soon fol law the approval a f'tfie ' _ -additIanaI funding by the City 0 unciI. tl t•; r.. T. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT ,U6able to comlete the contract for the purchasa of the new tanks: need to �. —r&ntlmfe utilizinn the present storage tanks. � '.-.•.'.wr...+r�..rr+ww..*._.._.-.....f.-_.-._�___.�.-.._... _.._T.._.. r....�-�..._« aa....-..............«...v..,w."�:1.A;i.Ja.7?v:G�'.1LR7ta�-fi�.rv.+�r!. y `fir • w ��It C11rV OF 1�1�L�'� woTOK BEACH H i INTER-DEPAEtTMENT COMMUNICATION rxMV XTCW KAO To Charles'W ;Thdmpson From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief cif Administrative Services .t }' Subject installation'of Underground Fuel Date April 10, 1981 Tanks at Beach Wntenance Yard FIR 1 81-42 fr'i response to the request-of the Community Services lkapartment•,:: I.,am hereby sEJ6 rr.itttng,a Financial'•Impact'-Report. relative to.the request for additional funding. :17-0.accommada*e the higher' than anticipated kids for the replacement of diesel and .water oil, tanks at'`the geacti Haintenance Yard. An appropriation increase of $2;899 witl .be'requi'red 'Eo fund Ehis project. 5uffictpnt 'fusidiig'is available in the Capital Outlay fund for- flits purpose. .`Shoiild ; the Cit Council be:desirous-of approving this'r�:quest, the balance in:the Capital Y , Outlay -fund wiII" reduced to $441,079.98- Chief of Adrinistrative`5e'�vi_ces ,'. FBA/AR/cg� .. i r ` REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Daft Aarll 9. 192 1 Submitted to: Mayor and City Council ZL-bmittsd by: Charles W.Thompson,City Administrator Prepomd by: Paul E.Cook,Director of Public Works;Ew 1e W.Robitaille,Police Chief; and Raymond C.Pic:ud,Fire Chief Subject: JOINT.UTILIZATION OF VEHICLE lkr="A PA w o E Y C I T V cvurtcu, Backup Material Attaci:ed: tic I Yes I ]No Statemant of Issue,Recommeadstion,Analysis,Fundingguu� Statmenf of'Issue: pun completion of the new Lake Street Fire Statlan,the Police and Fire Dapmlmente vehicle maintenance operation will have to vacate•the old Lake Street Fire Station site so the propedy can be sold..It•.is I*pi*ed that-the vehicle maintenance functions for these two departments be relczwed to the City Corpo ration Yard garage. That facility wi!i Ira JcIntly utilized by the Public Works,Police and Fire Dcperrtments for vehicle maintenance. ` Recommendations: ut xrf za 1in` be Iven to relocate the vehicle maintenance functiorn for the Pallee.and Fire Departments from the old Lake Street Fire Station to the City CorMatlan bard garage. Autliarizatian Ile given to expend an estimated. 103,700.from the Capital'Out:ay fund in order.to - motify and equip the Corporation YcW garage 1;r the joint utilization of the t ehlcie malntenar►ce area. Authorization be given to add one position of tire repairman to.the Public Klark.0 staff at an timatpd annual cost of$20,000 to consolidate repalr of tires Mall three depaclments, reduce contract costs 0-1d relieve qualified mechanics from this duty. If approved,this position will not be gilled during FY 198"l. Aral stet t t ne present tinie,titre vehicle.niaintenar�ce facilities for the?olive and Fire Departiinents are located an.he south side of the old Lake Fire Station. Upon,cm, pletion of the'new Lake Fire Station, It Is appropriate to vacate the building. There are two basic options for relocating the vehicle mainta>arnce ' facilities of the two.departments. One'is to constrLct a new garage facility behind the Gothard.Street Fire Station at an.estimated cost of$500,000. 'The otlnar aption.is to modify the existing garage at ti'm Corporation Yard so it cart be Jointly utilized with the Public Works Departmnat. This report recommends the latter option at an estimated cost of$103,700. The attached report describes how'thc relocation of the Police and Fire vehicle maintenance facilities would be Implemented and how the olnt utilization of that facility would be operate! In the for;-um Also attached Is a cost breakdown of the necessary improvements required'to implement the Joint oli lizatio' n Program. - Alternatives: . Retainiho vehicle maintenance facility at the old Lake Street Fire Station and do'not sell the site. I Construct a new vehicle maintenance garage at the GotKird Street Fire Statiacn at an estimated $5000000 cost. Fundl'n Source: ap to outlay Fund,estimated amount$103,700. General Fun3 to finance ne%v position of tire repairman. CWT:PEC:EWR:RCP:sn Attcchment No=1 �,•� I '.ti:',Z��1.'.+.,dw.w-•------_'_^.. ,._.__........._.._._•____^__•__•.,-... .....a..�.,., ..._�.+�-•--- . ._.._.._.._....._...__..--..,..e...w........,a..,,....'Se:..c,.GG.fi1:.".c M r PROPOSAL FOR JOINT UTILI7_ATION•OF EXISTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY I. INTRODUCTION In the for solutions to'the ClWs vehicle mainteno ce program,mazy combin6ti6iis of physical facilities and organizational alternatives have been. proposed. The most viable solution is one which efficiently utilizes the existing physical facilities while retaining or�mlzationol control by Individual departments. A. Maximum use of existing facilities. B. Minimum additional funding. C. Maintain present departmental staffing strexture. D. Maintain present departmental fem&nq control. E. Minimum eepartmental operatiaiul disruption. The basis for this proposal is the joint utilization of vehicle and"other related eojuipmait mc'intenwm activities for the Public Works,Fire.and Police Departments into the existing Vehicle Maintenance Building located at the Corparatlm Yard.. IL POLICY PROJECT 'TEAM A policy man;agemerit team will be formed to establish general.cooperative operational policy. The team will have a representative from each affected operating department,i.e., Public Works,Police and.Fire. r Ill. WORK SPACE . I .The primarycyarkspace filhe existing F'jwfc Works Vehicle'Mainte3nanco facility and there"is adequate space'in the garage to handle the three 'departvneyts. 1hea Public Works Director will assign a specific:work area to , ' Police and Fire Departments for their use and to rneet'their sperlal eguip►nent needs. This wdrk area v4oerld cwuist of one 28 x'40 foot stall for.the police Department plus a'partial stall for motorcycle worts, one 28 x 40 foot stall for j the Fire Department and a third 28 x 40 foot stall jointly shared by Police and "Fire. .There wil; also be joint use of the'front-end pit and service pit as needed. Joint ui6ge of other garage areas where spe;cialty.equipn"t is permanently located Is.-also autha;ized and spore would be provided for instatlortion of all equipment preseltly owned by the Police and Fire Departments. IV. OFFICE;SPACE Office:space will be allocated to meet the s}�e,cial needs of the Poly slid Fire Departments so they may maintain proper lialson with their respective agencies. 'I r ,1 4 tN •e L . V. TELEPHONES r.�+',.; r is { The'two current Fire Departmet R4LM lines will be trans to they storekeeper office area with extensions to the Fire Department repair stall. ` The Police set up will be similar. VI. PERSaNNEL All personnel will remain the direct r6sponsibilf of each., ty depm-lmentjand the supervisors will continue to report to their department managers or divisions. VII. TIRE REPAIR LABOR >4 Onearea of vehicle maintenance common to 611 three departments which would ` bey acceptable 4,a labor pooling activity is tire repair. Willi all three dep Ytme nts combined,enough tire work would bei generated to Justify"a ferll-tIme.tire repair person.. If funding Is provided for-the position in the 1981-82 budget,it•will relieve the higher pald'mechanics from doing the tower skill levef work and Increase the preventive maintenmce capability of all three dcpartrients. Cast: approximately$20,000 per yea-. Vlll. STORA(t AND WAREHOUSING A. Tire Storage The floor area of the present tiro chap is irRadCquate for the lire repair facility. An estimatext cost of$36,000 will pr60de the ' necessary equipment for the consolidated tire repair facility. . f B. Sweeper Broom Material-This high.•bulk material is stored in a worn . space stall•at present. A se&ciid floor of wire mesh similar to the ona far = the tire shop would be constrtjcted'ov&tl:a Iasi stall at the nortleecisfr !: corner of the garage at a cost.included In the'tire room'prQoosat.' This area would be sufficient to hmidle'the street sweeper material'ard'some bulky Fire Department materials related to equipment mairtenance. C. Steel Fabricating Material -A"garage work stall is presently.used far steel storage. A solution for steel storoge mould be'the assignment of one stall in"Building C with a suitable wire mesh scree n for security. ' Estimated screening costs: $l,000. D. Vehicle Repair Parts-Some of the repair parts for all three departments can be integrated into the Public Works parts section. There will also be t a seeir6d area for those Fire chid Police Department W., es unique•to. E their t*lpment. A camsolidated spa:a parts system will be established by the policy management team. E. Fire Department Misoe!lanerous-The Fires Department maintains an Inventory of nozzles,breathing apparatus,axes, air masks,'turnouts, fire boots, uniforms, extinguishers and brackests,spares and other supplies at Its preset site for repair and replacemeint of fire equtpment.' Secure warehousing will be established by the policy management team In a gee-ographic location adjacent to the Fire Department's office area, (ct.a ._4Gr t„..yid:•'fw"WSiJwivua;o.xar..,.nnn•,,.,.i.+a,nw.•v...e o.w...+........ t.�..,... ...,..........t.r..,.+».. .v.rw:::�..•: .: it K' � s '^ ;.i.j"%• �1S•�.^•t:iN'.ir.,"'7' y Jr. 1e:: ;?.3,'l:.C:.•»ice v1..H'.,t}`yi r.i,x tJ,i.3.t;:"j5�'ti# r - z • IX. VEHICLE PARKING The proposed consolidation will impact vehicle parking areas at the Corporation Yard in the following ways: A. Employee Parking-.The addition of seven full-time employees will not significantly affect the employee parking area. B. Garage Seivicie Vehicles-Four additional service vehicles can be accommodated with present parking. C. Vehicle Hold Area-Parking for vehicles waiting to'be worked on'or.. ; cxxinpleiled ant waiting to be returned to assigned programs is inadequate. Parking space: in tivs area at the'north end of the shop building will be made available. X. SHOP EQUIPMENT Since this proposal involb-es specific shop wark,;spoce areos being cosigned for exclusive use of;the Police and Fire;Departments, those assigned spaces must be e"quippesi.,,,T e'min1mum new equipment requtrenents will be'five hydraulic hoists"plus additional overheed'lubr16itlon equipment at a'aotal estimated cost of.$510000 installed. 'i'hree of.tfie hnists are for Police.Department"and,two,for Fire Department.: The lubrication equipment will be shared. Also,with the increased utilization of all work areas it will be more difficult to clean'the stalls. Tu minimize the man hours.alloted to this activity;a recommendation Is made to purchase a mechanized floor scrubber at a cost of$7,000. Xl. SECURITY AND ACCESS The security syste t at the Corporation Yard Is`a normal three-level system consisting of a perimeter fence with locked.vehlcle access gates and a series of locked buildings inside the perimeter plus'secvre areas within each building.,; Thls`system holds true for the garage facility. Keys are issued to personnel who require access to specific areas at the beginning of each shaft or during off-duty hours,for emergency work. An effort is made to limit tl)e'number of keys Issued to each building. Each participating department will be provided with the necessary keys to provide the current level of service. Taw Fire and Police Departments must maintain d posture of being able to reeovtw vehicles being held for repair, for emergency service. XI1. ECONOMIC IMPACT 1. Steel grate mezzanine floors and storage racks installed in tire shop and north bay of equipment repair shop,material cnd labor. $56,000 2. Security, divider screen and access door Installed in east bay of building"C". 11000 ,,i,:.A .}_..�iy.+.'NS�s.-..ti:.;F.,,!..•2..r ..,.!'_ R•s N. _:+I•d'w :.1ti i•.... ..t .. _ .....v •w.u>.....:.�,..,.i::l�.:,r:+.T.t..t:�..«:.::,r:::ti.:\ •a-1 .A!'f.i�:.�� +(u�{.r+t I 00 These two items will substantially increase storage space for tires, sweeper broom material,,,ecel bar and sheet stock,etc.plus spare parts required by the Police acid Fire Departments. At the same time, it will free up garage;tare shop,and H, whine shop workspace presently occupied by some of those materials and whlcto will be needed to accommodate" the additional Police and Fire mechanics. 3. Miscellaneous relocations of garage shop,office, and pa`rtx'room electrical,.81ructural heating equipment, etc. JJOOO Theses building modifications are needed.to Accommodate the additional supervisory and parts`raa i personnel from ,. Police and Fire Departments,providing them with desk and workspace, and service outlets for presently awned portable equipment, both shop and office. +4. Two vesicle hydraulic hoists,plus lubrication and service'reels to be installed in numbw four bay,west Side of garage. ,27,700 . This item covers the cost of all labor saving`eilul jrhent to tie installed in the'g�aroge and used by the Fire Department meclMics in their vehicle malntenta e progrwr,so as to maintain,the present level of service. 5. Three hydruuII6 vehicle hoists,plus lubrication serrvice reels;portable oil drains and Jacks to be installed in number two bay, west side of garage. 230300 This iterni.eovers all:r, q ted 41cle maintentmce equipment for'the Police M-partm•artt to cont:nve'their ; present siervirx level. 6. Mechanized floor scrubber to to purchased for use by rill facility personnel. . 79000 :This ltem,will*be needed because of the greatly . increased usage factor of the total garage floor urea by three•depi+*rents, oral canscipuent shorter percentage of time available,for cleaning. This machine can do'the ; work of 10 men with mops and squeegees. 7. Rack storage for Fire equipment 50000 Rack storage will be ruye�ded to provide for 1200 square floor feet of Fire Department specialized equipment. fypyra w..r— .�.... ..._�...._._. �.......�«.�.�.�,.,,,maw...,c...,....,•r.r.._.�.._.---...._..-_.� _ r....«.-wrurwY4.r.�ws4s-+s::«dd�r'.'I�'�.SY�t 8. CMmercial movers,Fire. 29000 ' .r M Estimated cost for commercial moving company,to move all heavy and light equipment from the Lake Station to the City Yard. 9. Moving cost. 700 Moving casts are based an paying ilk employees for eight hours each'uf labor an a Sunday. This would be a4 time and one-half or approximately$14.00'per hour. TOTAL CAPITAL COST '$1030700 10. Perssannel cost, tire service person,estimated annual salary. 20,0Q0 The the serniioe Pa rson,as noted In.the orlglnal propose!, has been acaepte by all thre department directors as a corOlned'activity posltion.- The three departments will generate sufficient tire work to justify a fuil'time pasitlon.' This work was previousiy-done by mechanics and outside vendor contract. The revery of outslde vendor tits repair casts will partially offset the proposed salary,approximately$M to$rim annually. Xlll. CONCLUSIONS Therms m urgent ineed to:pravlde adequate vehicle re-�:r.facilities for Pollce 'and Fire Deportment operation,because the old Lake Fire Station site into be sold. The Corporation Yard can.be modified to meet these needs. If approved, these changes ccn be implemented by October, 1981. The,onetime costa .&;ilding''odificaitions and equipment purcliases,.tatal $96,000s the estimated charges for rack storage end cant of the'move'from Lane Street to the Corporation Yard at$7,700. In addition,one new employee Is regMsted at$20,000 per year. -r�,�,t�i/.�Y'W.'..f'ws+..+--..--'--.....�..._.�._.._...._. �_.. '--......-----•..�..,.ww..x........r,...,.....r...._...__-...._..�. .��.......+mrnc.tariaX.lcunn,.n+s.rt►JKY:Y4�Si.Ta.'1fTif rYa:..r. /V ,•, J J ..t h .. t • •J.. yq, ,. .. •-.t 4 f• r • < .�' BLDG. C 4 PROPOSED JOINT-;;,USA'G FACILITIES 'MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED SCREEN "TIRE SHOP 1 PROPOSED MEZZANINE ... . FLO60S P r OR - I i ADDITIONAL STORAGE 10-TON ; OVERHEAD �----- � �s FIRE CRANE POLICE TYPItAL r. PROPOSED HOISTS 28 PR600 El) HOISTSmm d; OFC SUPPLY. '4 LOCKERS s - �� CITY OF HUNTIN TAN BEACH kcv" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To.- Charles W. Thompson From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Joint. Utilizatton of City Yard Date April °10, 1981 Vehicle Maintenance Facility FIR 1 81-39 In.rc.sponse to the; Joint request-of.`the Public"Work's Fire and Police departments,. } i am herby submitting a Financial Impact' Report relative•..to the fundiog,for. modifying and-properiy equiping the Corporate City Yard to accommodate'the merger of the vehicle tl malntenance.funcons into one centralized site. It has additionally been requested that $20,000"be appropriated in the FY1981-82 budget for purposes of creDting the positlon of tire repairman. Sh6V d ithe"Ci"ty Counci V be.des Iious of approving the proposed Joint"utilizotlon program at-,the City "Yard,•,,funds;,are available. in the Capital Outlay,;fund.. An appropriation in the amount of .$103,700 wII Y be,re'quired, which H111 reduce the . balance cif the Capital Outlay fund to $443,978.98• �j6 uld;the -City Councii`chose to approve the addstlon of the tire.repalrman:position ,•to'the Pubi ie k'orks staff".for 0Y198147. -'at 'this time - rather.,than.uti 1 izing the_:' - regula�r-programmat.ic/priority procedure for programs. to be considered in the FY1961- 82.budget, 'an.appropria4ion in the amount of $209000 w111, be required. The "approval of this appropriation would reduce'.the balance of the contingency fund to'$19271,391.66: F:•.B. Ar el lb Chief of Administrative Services . FWAR/cg I • ► 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON OCACH FINANCIAL. IMPACT REPORT Project Name Joint Utilization 'of Vehicle Maintenance Facility Description (1) Funding for modification of C6r orate City Yard to accommod ate__ merger of Police, Fire and Public Works vehicle Maintenance functions; (2) Funding for one position of tire 'repairman. 1. DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1.1 One-Time Costs an urn., ac Er- uisition. Construction . ties, E ui ment Other Total Cost 102,700 .10A1700 1'.2 Recurring Annual Costs i Additional. Materials OutsUde Pa oll Personnel Su., lIin Services Revenues Total 'Cos 20,000 20'000. ! 1.3 Replacement/Renewal- Costs $500•,OOD"to -$700,000 would'be estimate of requesting_"departments'-If,the construction' of a -nevi facility is contemplated. 2. 1NDIRCCT COSTS N/A l ' f �N!l".'.r,.14,14:4.J< �tr..r.NlJ.M aYr+ —r..�....,,,....,...r........�..... ...�....«.-r.arrli r ... . ... ...•- ..'v.nr w.a ...-+. r,w+.. [. Y+[. ...r Financial Impact Report ' Page 2 . 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS ► 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Proceeds from the sale of the present fact 1 i tx for P,•ji ice/Ffre vehicle maintenance would'pay for the conversion-effort. A successful adaptation of the proposed • vjhicie maintenance consol IdatIon effort might'result in a' lessened reed for the ,...I.......Y. ... .. degree of upper ochelon management, {iresently necessitated to oversee the three ;4 separate operations. 5. PROJECT USAGE ' 1,L' ..r.._.. ...,...._,._ j 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Sep: attached informational supplement pertiln169 to the time scheduie for sting the merger and vacating the old Fire station. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTihu THE PROJECT i Status guo wtl1 ereyatI and the City will continue to operate..- and fund' - ' _ three essentially similar, though independently autonomous vehicle maintenance Z : programs. ' d . • .....r...,a+raiY/YMYY.4tI Y..rt.J4ei!}J.RM.+ 6