Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStreet Improvements - 1964 through 1982 - Resolution 5037 - r, Record Box No. 224 Page 1 of 2 Res # Date INACTIVE RECORDS Subject 98: Schools Subject 99: Sewers—Storm Drains I Subject 101 : Signals & Signs Subject 103: Street and Waterway Improvements Subject 106: Taxes Subject 113: Trash Disposal Subject 114: United States Government Subject 115: Utilities Subject 116: Vacations S-u-b_j e-c t-_1_LZ_a/a-r-+&n-c-gs �� dv �J cy— 98 — Schools `��-- 99 — Sewer Projects Completed Contracts on Microfilm (list) 101 — Signals & Signs 1964-1974 1980 103 — Waterways — File #1 103 — Streets File #1 106 — Taxes : Fire Protection Exemption 106 — Tax Cancellation 1986-1988 /049— / a Deeds thru 4666-5014 f 106 — Taxes : General 113 — Trash Disposal #1 of 2 113 — Trash Collection I 113 — Dewey' s Rubbish Service Commercial—Industrial Cert. of Need and Necessity 114 — United States Government Community Redevelopment Act i- Urban Renewal 115 — Utilities : Edison Co. f v t Record Box No. 224 Page 2 of 2 Res # Date INACTIVE RECORDS Subject 98: Schools Subject 99: Sewers-Storm Drains Subject 101 : Signals & Signs Subject 103: Street and Waterway Improvements Subject 106: Taxes Subject 113: Trash Disposal Subject 114: United States Government Subject 115: Utilities Subject 116: Vacations 116 - Vacations : Streets: Crest Avenue (Never Completed) 1958 117 - Variances : Miscellaneous 1961 117 - Variances : Use and Area 1958-59 #101-#149 117 -' Variances : Use and Area 1959-60 #150-#202 r U rl VJ I4 Sm e REQUES--k-' FOR CITY C®UNCIL:� GTI ow Date December 14, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council co Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato APpR � Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Work �— CITY C Subject: RESTRIPING OF MAIN STREET FROM UTICA TO 14T E Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: Opj STATEMENT OF ISSUE: e Transportation Cormission has approved an action calling for the restriping of Main Street from Utica to 14th Street. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve plans and authorize the Department of'Public Works to implement actions. ANALYSIS: The Traffic Engineering Section has investigated the citizens' complaints and requests concerning the matter of traffic control on Main Street for the past three months. All aspects of traffic engineering were covered in the investigations. These in\�estigations included machine traffic counts, speed surveys, alternate route studies and bus usage studies. The Traffic Engineering Section of Public Works presented its findings, data and observations to the Transportation Commission at its regular scheduled meeting of November 10, 1981. After considerable discussion and numerous public speakers, the Commission elected to approve one of the alternatives proposed for this project. The alternative selected included installing one lane of traffic in each direction from Utica to 14th Street. The Transportation " Commission approved plan is included for review. FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for the implementation of this plan would be from the Public Works maintenance account. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not Applicable. 4' ATTACHMENTS: Diagrams. CWT:PEC:KH:dp PIO 4/81 Exhibit A Scale= f=20 s PROFILE .III! LANE IN KErI -i f- parking area existing median king area Sol LM J � I ;NV1 REVISIONS REFERENCES PREPARED BY: DATE 'O. DATE INIT. APP'V D Neff NO. MAIN ST. RESTRIPING PR[1TEC'I' OF HU I O APPROVED DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SMT_.JJF DEPARTODt�09T OF PU( ;WORKS DATE i REQUESi FOR CITY COUNCILACTION r i Date December 14, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato ✓ Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Warksfti Subject: RESTRIPING OF MAIN STREET FROM UTICA TO 14TH STREET i Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: Ot STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Transportation Commission has approved an action callin or the restriping of Main Street from Utica to 14th Street. RECOMMENDATION: / That the City Council approve plans and a thorize theoepartment of Public Works to implement,acti ons. ANALYSIS: TheTraffis Engineering Section has investi tied the citizens' complaints and requests concerning the matter of traffic control on din Street for the past three months. All aspects /�of traffic engineering were covered in the in stigations. These investigations included machine traffic counts, speed surveys, alt6rna a route studies and bus usage studies. The Traffic Engineering Section of Public Woks pr ented its findings, data and observations to the Transportation Commission at its rogular sc eduled meeting of November 10, 1981. After considerable discussion and numerous publi speakers, the Commission elected to approve one of the alternatives proposed for this project. The alternative selected included installing one lane of traffic in each direction from Utica to 14th Street. The Transportation " Commission approved plan is included for review. FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for the implement/t, n of this plan would be from the Public Works maintenance account. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Diagrams. CWT:PEC:KH:dp (71 r nin.zni , 17TH ST . i UTICA PAWED ISLAND I i r .............. •:!.r •r::..:::... . rt :::::r:::• ::::• : :/. •vl::::.•:l:.�f r:•i f: f:.•f......:::::••:{f.}•:•••• e_._v____vuv_u_..fnvvvvvv.v .l�l/' is t fv f .fi •:h::fi v:•:t::f..Syr•• ............:..... •f.f jri�ti;iiiri%lr�: 1 MAIN ST, �-ate Not to Scale C � r REVISIONS REFERENCES PREPARED BY DATE w0. DATE I►M APP V'D 'XITTBIT "B" NO Main St. @ 17th St. VIIIAWN d I - Alignment 0- u APPROVED C OF 6'•iUN ® REACH DEPARTIAINT OF PUMIC WORKS DATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SHT-OF REQUE6-i FOR CITY C®UNCLACT6®N' Date December 9 , 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Go � Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City AdministratorvE Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Wor s Subject: Barricading Service Fees :____"""` T 07J? Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: It is now very time consuming to update barricading service fees because they are specified in the Municipal Code. The process could be stream- lined by revising the Code to allow these fees to be set by resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Amend section 12. 24. 010 of the H.B.M.C. to allow service fees for street barriers and warning lights to be set .by resolution. ANALYSIS: The rapid pace of inflation necessitates a more frequent updating of barricading fees than in the past if these fees are to continue to be commensurate .with service costs. The old process _ of establishing fees in ordinance form is now too cumbersome and time consuming to be continued. Both time and resources could be conserved by allowing the fees to be set by resolution. This would require amending section 12. 24. 010 of the H.B. Municipal Code to read that these fees shall be set by resolution. FUNDING SOURCE: No funds involved; changes in procedure only. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Continue to set fees by ordinance. , so s ATTACHMENT: GSS' Revised ordinance 71, CWT:PEC:JS: jy I I P10 4/81 REQUES- , FOR CITY COUNCIL raC ION Date December 9 , 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council i Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato I Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public WorksYgoy 'L I �y Subject: Street Barricading Fee Schedule des Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative A ns, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The current street barriers and warning lights fee schedule adopted in 1967 is inadequate to compensate the City for the cost of providing those services. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution providing a new fee schedule to be implemented on the effective date of a new ordinance allowing these fees to be set by resolution. ANALYSIS: The fees collected for street barricades and warning lights. inspection, j placement and repair are no longer commensurate with the cost of providing these services. A new schedule, specified in a proposed resolution, has been prepared by the Public Works Department in order to overcome a pro- jected deficit. . Council approval is now requested. FUNDING SOURCE: No funds required; change in policy only. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Retain the existing fee schedule. ATTACHMENT: G/ Proposed resolution. 2 ' v I CWT:PEC:JS: jy ` PIO 4/81 i REQUES-i FOR CITY COUNCIL-,ACTION Date August 27, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate Submitted by: P Y r" Pre pared b James W. Palin, Director of Development Services P y Subject: RESOLUTION FOR ALTERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN 73-1, P4�j TAYLOR/BEACH SPECIFIC PLAN Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachmei_ ts: " STATEMENT bF ISSUE: Transmitted for the City Councills action, is the resolution which has been prepared by the -City Attorneys .office to amend Specific Plan 73-1, the Taylor/Beach Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION• Adopt the attached resolution; which will modify Specific Plan 73-1 eliminating the closure of Taylor Drive. ANALYSIS- At the July 200, .1,981. City Council meeting, , the Council field a pub- lic hearing and took testimony on the modification of Specific Plan 73-1,- the Taylor/Beach Specific Plan This specific plan was ;; . originally adopted in 1973 acid subsequently amended in 1978. The specific plan 'called. for the closure of Taylor. Drive at Pammy Lane. Subsequent to the completion of Ellis Avenue, Taylor Drive was closed with temporary barricades. Taylor Drive :remained closed for several months; which prompted . a number. of residents- in the area to petition the Council for the reopening of Taylor Drive. . In .June of 1981 'the Planning Commission held' a public hearing on this matter and trans''mitted a 'recommendation to the City Council for the. re- opening of Taylor Drive. Based on public testimony -and discussion, the Council directed that the City Attorney's 'Off ice prepare the necessary resolution to amend Specific Plan 73-1 _and reopen .Taylor Drive. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL " SUPPORTING INFORMATION: �� 1 1. Resolution 2. Minutes of City Council meeting from July 20, 1 '8.1 clTYr Ct R SMB:df P10 4/81 n k Page #2 - Council Minutes - 7120181 COMMENDATION - CHARLENE BAUER - NEWLAND HOUSE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 1978-81 Mayor Pro Tem Pattinson presented a plaque to Charlene Bauer for having served as Chairperson on the Newland House Board of Trustees from 1978-1981 . DECISION - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF CE 81-8 - OVERRULED PC _- APPROVED CE 81-8 - W1FINGS & CONDITIONS - R FAMILY DODGE Mayor Pro Tempore Pattinson announced that this was the day and hour set for a decision regarding a public hearing that was closed May 18, 1981 to consider an appeal to the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-8, a request to construct a five foot high wrought iron fence at zero property line on a site located on the west side of Beach Boulevard between Neil Avenue and Chrysler Drive in the C4 (Highway commercial) 'District. On motion by MacAllister, second Bailey, Council .overruled the Planning Commis- sion and approved CE 81-8 with the following Findings and Conditions of Approval : Findings, for Approval 1 . The subject property has .consideeably more frontage than 'a normal auto agency in the same zone and located on the same street. 2. The subject auto agency is located on a unique parcel of land because of its shape and location. Condition of Approval The security fence shall be constructed to the approval of the Department of Development Services in compliance with standards depicted in the site plan reviewed by the Council and dated July 16, 1981 . The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Pattinson, Bailey NOES: Mandic' ABSENT: Thomas, Finley, Kelly i PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDCNT TO SPECIFIC PLAN 73-1 - APPROVED -, RES TO BE, PREPARED TAYLOR DRIVE - TUBE.0 N - STO SIGN DEL R TAYLOR APPROVED - TRANSPURTMW COMMISSION TO 9TUDY AMITTO—NAL-STOPG The Mayor Pro Tem announced that this was the. day and. hour set for a public hearing to consider an amendment to Specific Plan 734 (Taylor and Beach Specific Plan, adopted December, 1973), The amendment would explore the possibility of deleting the closure of Taylor Drive from the Specific Plan. The City Clerk announced that all. legal requirements for notification, publica- tioh and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Director of Development Services presented a Viewgraph of the area. The Mayor Pro Tech declared the hearing open. n�� Page #3 - Council Minutes - 7120181 Fred Gruenebaum stated that he was on the Board of Directors of Huntington Village ! Estates';'die requested that Taylor Street be open. He stated that he represented sixty-one households. Dawn Kolbo requested that Taylor Drive be opened. Jerry Lantz requested that Taylor Drive be opened. .Jim Manarrich requested that Taylor Drive be opened. Glen Burkett stated that cars from the car lots nearby were tested on the streets in t e R gg borhood and requested. that Taylor Drive be kept closed. Craig Kenneth requested that Taylor Drive be kept closed. He requested that if it were opened that a stop sign and speed signs be installed. Italo Mascari suggested that Taylor Drive be closed at the east side of Delaware Street. He stated that there was no street sign for Delaware at Main Street. Beverly Lawson requested that Taylor Drive stay closed. She stated that there ha n- o break-ins in the tract since the street was Closed. Carol Elson requested that Taylor Drive be opened. Gail Morris requested that Taylor Drive be opened. There being no, one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor Pro Tem. Mayor Pro Tem Pattinson suggested prohibiting left hand turns on a off Beach Boulevard at Taylor Drive. Councilman MacAllister requested that staff contact the car agencies regarding the use of Taylor Drive as a test site for their cars. . Following discussion, a Motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Bailey, to accept the Planning Commission's recommendation to amend Specific Plan 7.3-1 opening Taylor Drive and direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution; and that the traffic control measures- as delineated on the diagram as submitted by the Director of Public Works be implemented at the intersection of Delaware Street And Taylor Drive . and that the rest of the project be looked at by the Transpor- tation Commission. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 'MacAllister, Pattinson, Bailey, Mandic NOES: None ABSENT: Thomas, Finley, Kelly PUBLIC COAMENTS Norman Benno stated that he had been a reside t for weekends and summers at Huntingto ores Mobilehome for ten years and that he had recently purchased a home to live there permanently in, retirement. He stated that he had never been informed that the mobilehomte park was not permanent. He requested ordinances from Council to protect the mobilehome owners rights. 0 RESOLUTION NO. 5037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING AMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 73-1 WHEREAS, after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code section 65500, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach held a public hearing on an amendment to Specific Plan No. 73-1 on June 16, 1981; and Amendment to Specific Plan. No. 73-1 is` necessary to im- prove the circulation of traffic due to closure of Taylor Drive, j implemented by adoption of Resolution No. 4590 on February 21, 1978; and On July 20, 1981 , after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code section 65507, hearing was held before this Council on the proposed amendment to Specific Plan 73-1 to re- move the barricade on Taylor Drive, and the matter having been considered, the Council finds that such proposed amendment is ( a) necessary to the orderly and efficient flow of traffic; ( b) necessary for the preservation of the health and safety of the inhabitants of the city; and (c) necessary for the orderly development of the community, NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : 1 . That amendment to Specific Plan No . 73-1, on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved. 2. That the map , designated Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference , is hereby adopted as part of amended Specific Plan No. 73-1 . 3. Resolutions No. 3810, 4590 and all resolutions in con- flict herewith are hereby repealed. ahb 8/7/81 1. + R PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of ry, of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of September 1981. -.. Mayor or ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED: a&4101 City Adm n strata irector of Development Services 2. SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 35-5-II CITY OF LEGEND ��.orxmeF waroao Fnawar HUNTINGTON BEACH OIZANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP H ie TALB£RT� AVE. ci m i G C F-:Rt Ak�l :�RAFI 1i Ll I'RAN I- R GR ttH • T�ndl i �r r ONTARIO OR WIL`i41i1 - --CF-C DWTC14 �' SEC OR ' ALBERT ELLIS N � ryR, � Y11KON OR AVE. Fl Y W)SPi"". j r0 2 _ g W ai;'f F a : � 0 f = O LL n FO GARFiELD AVE. I ss u lir 5PFZIFIG PL AA 73-1 -�3. No. 5037 s'rA'L'E. OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Be: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) �r t. I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted .by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day Of September 19 81 , by the following tote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson; Finley, Mandic, Kelly NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Bailey City Clertt and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ..r ... ,e.Stt:,,.+;..rh.-.. v. .br!•rn.:ldt^+J:ltt+?AW.uPW e4r..s rem•pyf:ltriK+Y f.Pr.vih.+'_. •. .. ...,.....,...... _, ,r,... r. ,.e tin,a .rr..n_..,..,--. .,.._,.,,......, .«..:..,.+.-.+..r,a.se.,o-».rz.,a.»...,.,..,o,.... � e REQUES-i FOR CITY COUNCIL- ACTION r - = 103 Date un e 4 19 81 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted b Charles Thompson, City Administrato6 Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of. Public Work' s' Vince Moorhouse , Director of Communit vice Subject: Improvement of Adams Avenue Adjacent to Bartlett Park Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: NC,/ Statement of Issue : Signal Landmark Corporation, at the City 's request , solicited construction bids for the improvement of Adams Avenue at Bartlett Park, along with their required public improvements for the Newland Commercial Center. The costs have been reviewed and are competitive and reasonable . Recommendation: Authorize Signal Landmark to include the improvement of Adams Avenue adjacent to Bartlett Park in conjunction with the development of the Newland Center for a cost of $59 , 028 . 55 . Analysis : Adams Avenue needs to be widened in connection with the development of Bartlett Park. Conceptual plans for the park have been approved by the Community Services Commission and by prior Council action . Inclusion of this work with the street improvements being done by Signal Landmark at the Newland Center will not only accomplish the widening for the parks , but also will improve the traffic channelization on Adams and eliminate the future need to modify pavement and the traffic signal at Beach Boulevard and Adams . Bids for the needed street improvements adjacent to the park were reviewed by Signal Landmark and have been reviewed by this office . Unit prices are acceptable and indicate a cost savings to the City. Alternatives : 1. City to seek bids and award a contract. 2 . Do not widen Adams Avenue at Bartlett Park at this time . Funding Sburce : Park Acquisition and Development Funds Construction bid cost $5931028 . 55 $59 ,028 . 55 Material testing and contingencies $5 , 971 . 45 5 ,971 . 45 Total 5 ) 000 . 00 P10 4/81 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 1 - 6- 11 CITY OF HUNTINGTON - BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP GARFIELD AVE. AA DR cR LAN K R u, > 'ARC _j -LASS M I a ER ED NAUVtLLE DR LAN K R z - xz- L ELIl AD CF-R -IN — I S�UY E- (,,o FRANOSCA4�:�: R j CF-E ENFIELD CR KEEL' M D CUSS DR ANT-DR J'�ji, CR - EA:""TH III` DR NAP-ES DR CF-R Z� GIANT OR INC- 77� CR sF, A, AM- DANBURY CR LN TYLER OR Tm A -ER- sloE cP POLK CR GILFORD CR �-CR QY- EP S-PORT YORKTOWN j 11 Ll I I I AVE L. oEEKULF DR LAKE -LENF ALBATROSS DR CM z 1 1- _LG-RIffft-P�R PIERRE DR ANCHORAGE DR Mq- LAKE In-F HOPE OR CR AFT �T -E AUSTIN OR CF LN Zr- c-E- BREAKERS DR R -ST ILL oR BOISE DR DOLPHIN DR occ L P-1 -R D D, -I c2l� BELLMEAD DR EN Hfi fl-Hil MOSSFORD DR IVY CR - I --- I - CLIPPER I DR EN I LJ Lj-, u < PROJECTI .1 ELI V-E LA KPORT LOCATION CLARKDALE DR LOW MEAD D TTFTT�TT- m T -7 ADAMS AVE. r - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Charles W. Thompson From F. B . Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Improvement of Adams Avenue In Date June 8, 1981 Conjunction With The Anticipated Development of Bartlett Park FIR # 81-56 In response to the request of the Community Services and Public Works Departments, a Financial Impact Report is hereby being submitted relative to the proposed con- struction improvements of Adams Avenue. An appropriation in the amount of $65,000 will be required should the City Council choose to provide funding for this project at this time. Sufficient funding is available in the Park Acquisition and Development Fund for such purposes. An affirmative response by the City Council will reduce the balance in the Park Acquisition and Development Fund to $2,247,830.02. I F. B. Arguello Chief of Administrative Services FBA/AR/cg CITY OF, HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Improvement of Adams Avenue Adjacent to Bartlett Park Description Requested authorization to couple modifications to Adams Avenue in conjunction with anticipated development of Bartlett Park. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs Land urn. , FacIFFF Acquisition Construction ties, Equipment, Other Total Cost 65,000 65,000 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs Additional. Materials & Outside Payroll Personnel Supplies Services Revenues Total Cost 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs N/A 2. INDIRECT COSTS N/A Financial Impact Reports Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS N/A 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT Widening of Adams Avenue will serve to lessen the rush hour traffic congestion associated with that major artery and, as suggested by the requesting departments, eliminate the future needs for pavement/traffic signal modifications in the immediate area. 5. PROJECT USAGE Daily. 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING / Subsequent to City Council approval . 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT Should the City choose to go a similar route in the future, costs would undoubtedly be higher. i- REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 103 Date April 3 , 1981 Submitted to: Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works �.. Subject: Additional Funding for Ellis Ave. Imp oveme©APPROVE mY CITY COUNCIL CC 250, AHFP 688 y� a�/ - 1' Backup Material Attached: [ ]Yes [ ]No OTT CLZW� 1 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: Disputed work was not resolved prior to the acceptance of the project by the City Council. After many meetings with the contractor, a negotiated settlement was made for the disputed work. Recommendation: Approve additional funding for Change Order No. 10 in the amount -of $4 , 302. 21. Analysis': On November 3 , 1980 the City Council accepted the Ellis Avenue Improve- ments for an amount of $702, 301. 19. Prior to that time Brutoco Engineering and Construction, Inc. (the contractor) had filed a letter of potential claim for work completed by their subcontractor. This work included removing four feet of mud from a six-foot diameter pipe that was removed from one location, salvaged, and relayed at another location. The contractor claimed that he had no idea that there was four feet of mud standing in the pipeline and this caused him additional work not covered in the contract documents. The City disagreed with his original cost of approximately $34 , 000 for cleaning the pipeline, and after many meetings a final cost was agreed upon for this extra work. Funding Source: Project account No. 742500 : $4 , 302. 21 PEC:WAP: jy PIO 3/81 �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The document you are viewing contains additional information that is not possible to produce electronically. For information on how to locate this document for viewing , please contact or visit the City Clerk's Office for assistance . 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor — City Hall Huntington Beach CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 IldO 0/1— PS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION F�fl 042 HUNTINGTON BEACH To Paul Cook From George Tindall Subject Status of the Project to Widen Date March 6 , 1980 Edinger Ave. from Bolsa Chica Rd. to Westerly City Limits The City Council at their meeting of March 3 , 1980 requested an update relative to the status of the project to widen Edinger Avenue from Bolsa Chica Rd. to Sunset Aquatic Park. The project includes full widening between Bolsa Chica Rd. and Saybrook and adding an additional lane westerly to the westerly City limits providing protected left-turn lanes for the many street inter- y� sections. The original proposal was to provide full improvements throughout the length of the project. Right-of-way difficulties and increasing construction costs have made it necessary to search alterna- tives. The proposed project will meet the traffic demand and keep the cost within the budget. �\ This change in scope requires approval by the County since the project is receiving funding under the A.H_.F.P. program. County approval is anticipated by April. Assuming all environmental and right-of-way ' problems can be reached, it is anticipated construction can begin this fall. GLT: jy C", f� s✓� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 111 iN I INCTON BEACH To Paul Cook, Director of Public Works From Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk Subject Street Name Misspelling Date April 22, 1980 Kenworth or Kentworth Attached is a letter from John Guerin, Attorney at Law, regarding the name of the street on which he resides. This has come up from time to time, and I thought perhaps you could resolve the matter once and for all . Bob Sigmon says it is Kenworth on the original tract map and I have no record of a Street Name Change to Kentworth. The Street Location Map Book and the Fire Map have Kenworth on the map and Kentworth printed on the back. I Thanks. Alicia CC: Chief Picard Bob Sigmon ` t^ K JOHN GUERIN ATTORNEY AT LAW 1 1 18-A PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 714/536-9366 April 21, 1980 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Dear Mrs . Wentworth: For approximately one year (or perhaps longer) there has been a sign on the street on which I reside indicating that the street is named "Wentworth" . From 1965 until the .erection of that sign the street was known as "Kenworth Circle" . To the best of my knowledge there was no ordinance changing the name of the street. The misspelling of the name of the street is causing a substantial difficulty to people on the street particularly when they are expecting deliveries ! There ' s a possibility that the City might be liable for damages that accrue by reason of non-delivery of say telegrams or other items due to the erroneous name appearing on the street corner. Either come out and paint out the "t" or supply us with a new sign as soon as possible, otherwise the City runs a risk of liability. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation , Y s very r Iy, John Guerin lr - .... ' "• a as-rte P^:� ''' 79 ' � _.. ..A...,_ June 22, 1979 !, Petition to Huntington Beach City Council I RE: Huntington Landmark Adult Community Association We, the members of the Huntington Landmark Adult Community Association do petition the City Council to authorize the Huntington Beach Police Department to enforce traffic regulat- ions in our condominium complex. Huntington Landmark is a private community located within the perimeter of Magnolia and Newland Avenues , and Atlanta and Indianapolis. It is an adult community, minimum age 40 , with 1,600 residents and in the near future will grow to 1 ,200 units with an estimated population of 2 ,200 voters. The streets are privately maintained, and are posted at 25 miles per hour . At this time we have no means of enforcing traffic safety, and as it is we have our quota of lawbreakers. The streets are not dedicated to the city. The City Attorney' s Office, Mr . De La Loza, indicated that there have been previous precedents established for this type of law enforcement. Lieutenant Patton of the Huntington Beach Police Depart- ment offers no objection to occasional and random patrol of our area, provided the City Council so directs. F The Board of Dtrectors William Kantor Director , Security & Safety ov_� 6 a A J• I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNfWGTON BEACH R To CAPTAIN JENKINS From LT. PA D JUL G 19i9 Subject IRNITINGTON LANDMARK Date 6/26/7Jin' OF HIMINGTON REACHADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Mr. Kanter, Huntington Landmark, was advised of the requirements of the vehicle code when he complained of speeding vehicles in his area. He was further advised of the department and city negative policy concerning conversion of private streets to public streets. He advised me he was going to pursue it via petition to the City Council. T. Pa i, Lt. Traffic Bureau Commander cc: Jeri Chenelle v[y REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Paul E. Cook ( Department Public Works Date Prepared December 9 , 19 79 Backup Material Attached Yes x� No Subject Truck Parking on Adams Avenue City Administrator's Comments ��r1 Approve as Recommended. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: I� A petition has been received to prevent commercial truck parking on Adams Ave. from the easterly City limits to Newland Street. A previous staff recommendation on this matter was not approved by the City Council primarily because it included striping a bicycle lane on Adams from Derbyshire Lane to Lake Street. Revised Recommendation: 1. Prohibit parking on both. sides of Adams Ave. from the easterly City limits to Ce - - 2. Restripe Adams to provide six lanes of travel from the easterly City limits to Analysis: 11 At the City Council meeting of November 19, 1979 a staff recommendation including the two above items was not approved by the City Council primarily because a third recommendation was included to place markings and signs to establish a bicycle lane in each direction on Adams from Derbyshire Lane to Lake Street. This third recommendation was net with considerable resistance by Councilman Yoder. Staff has reconsidered this matter and feels that the recommendations to prohibit parking and restripe Adams to provide six travel lanes between the easterly City limits and Coldwater Lane .were very desirable for the two following reasons: 1. The problem of truck parking on Adams would be resolved. 2. Needed additional capacity for the high volumes of traffic on Adams would be provided. However, the provision of bicycle lanes on Adams is not necessary to accomplish the above traffic improvements. 'Therefore, the bicycle lanes were deleted from the revised recom- mendation. The cost to implement the revised recommendations is $16,000. Annual maintenance costs are estimated to be $1,000.00. Funding Source: It is proposed to use Gas Tax funds to implement the restriping and signing in the amount of $16,000.00. Annual maintenance in the amount of $1,000 will be financed from the Traffic Maintenance budget. Alternative: Retain the existing traffic control measure. PI a REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Paul E. Cook�EC Department Public Works Date Prepared Nov. 14 , 1979 Backup Material Attached a Yes No jSubject Truck Parking on Adams Avenue City Administrator's Comments 3-3 Approve as recommended Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: A petition has been received to prevent commercial truck parking on Adams Avenue from the easterly City boundary to Newland Street. Recommendation: L. Prohibit parking on both sides of Adams Avenue from the easterly City limits to Beach Blvd. to allow additional travel lanes. 2. Restripe Adams Avenue to provide 6 lanes of traffic from Brookhurst Street to Coldwater lane. 3. Place markings and signs to establish a bike lane in each direction from Derbyshire Lane to Lake Street. Analysis: Councilman Yoder has expressed concern during recent City Council meetings regarding the negative impacts and reduction of traffic safety as a result of parked commercial trucks along Adams Avenue. On October 10, 1979, the City received a petition signed by various officers of the Homeowner's Associations (see attachment) on this matter. The petition requested the prohibition of truck parking and listed a number of reasons for the request. The reasons were found to be accurate and reasonable. Therefore, the recommendations contained herein essentially conform to the suggestions in the request. The cost to provide additional lanes by restriping and prohibit parking with the use of signs is estimated to be $19,000.00. The estimated annual cost for maintenance is approximately $1,000.00. Funding Source: It is proposed to use Gas Tax funds to implement the restriping and signing in the amount of $19,000.00. Annual maintenance in the amount of $1,000 will be financed from the Traffic Maintenance budget. Alternative: Retain the existing traffic control measure. / PIo 3/73 Honorable Mayor and City Council � ;i City of IIunti_ngton Beach .� 1� At.Lention: Floyd G. Belsito, City administrator_ We, the.undersigned, hereby petition the City Council of Huntington Reach to prevent commercial truck parking on.Adago Avenue:, bets;sen' 'c sterly, City boundary and Newland.Street. Our reasons are as follows: 1. The primary nature of our area is residential.. 2. The Circulation Element of the Ceneral Plan,, Figure Q (pi 48 indicates that Ad&uas, bot,7een Bushard and Magnolia, is ."defki:ent" ,and further that the intersection of Bushard and Adams is "deficient", as sl icy�nz on the.attached diagram. 3. The` Circulation Element also sets forth the Coal (3.1.2.1,. ;. 46) that . .enst_res the safe and efficient movement of f5coplu and cLxrds, and the Policies (3.1..2.2,Nos. 5 and 7, pp. 46, 47) that "rrovido adequate Muck and rail. service to industrial and areas, . while provi.di_ng m-i_niinum disturbances to residential_ areas'' „Provide a transpo.r_tati.on system that is consistent- with efforts on minimize adverse environmental and aesthetic effects. '.'. 4. 'Truck` parking on Adams Ave. , bet�:een the easterly City L�.ou�; .awry.any. Newland Street is inconsistent with the goal _anal' policies as sew for,O above. a. Trucks parked along Adams Create safety,hazards for au ..c'; and iJ. }Tcic traffic. They interfere with the sicooth flow of t_aff in and pre-- " ventt, proper right turns from Adanis onto intersecting stroets. '11'Ic'y c_I1.e difficult t0 See when 1t 1S foggy anCt/Or after nightfall, and erratic traffic movement once (Iiscover�xl. _1,<; a re_kilt; on 1�cbxaa��y 18, 1978, between Magnolia and Estuary, apedd�:r. was killed t�bin the rider rode into the back of a parkgn truck. b.,. 'I :e, trucks, after having been par]�cd. for the"nicrht, are starter ' at 5:00 or 6:00 o'clock in the morning, and warred u) c;-. 15 t;:, .30 minutes tes In place, creating maximum dis'tLII"1)a ,,;,:,-s to rc':iNnUal : are�zs. This is an acute problem on the north side of east of Bushard. The residential areal have frontage Lcads on which .to park, thereby requiring no additional Parkin,on l-:c?ans. c: The aesthetic effects are self-evident: a large truck I:oxned_ i_n front of a res_ (_once on a regular basis detracts conslc_i- Obly from the sightliness of an area; that is part of 'ci�e rcz:son L.r. :c'k parking is not allcxved in other residential areas. Therefore-, and in consideraticm of additional infornolion provitod by the City, we respectfully request: - 1. 1"hat truck palki.ng be dishlowed -on Adaii s Avenue het_ween the easterly City boundary anj Newland Street ; �- 2. That Ac1alls Avenue IJCi rn.Itripcd to }-)rOv�de fC)r 3 lal: :� O� tlfflC. lI: each c:llc,ctlon, 3. - That a 'bicycle lark he ca_eaLed on both Whis Ot path for students to I'kl.L:-S High, as well as foL- (jLhc__.r �J1C�'CL1n�S. Vk-, would be pleased to- supply any additional. WonnaKoln n'W_;;sw y, c1:"O await-_ your (acL.ons hoping that no unfortunate accido t happyns Curing the it1 eri.m. , 7 y yr. • - . - We the 'underbigned-,have read the f,ollowinz; "letter �to theTaygr and City .Council- of Hgptington- Leigh .. VWe hereb"yJetition" for the prevention of , commerical t;r°'ucks being. harked on .Adams Ave . _ VILLAGE TOWNHOP`fNS , '7,N . , BOARD OIL DI'RECTOnS c ., b' , - - 306 UNlTS ' HUNTING OM COPd`I'_i-NENTAi P " y BOARD OIL DjRsQ qR; DAV1D HAYES , rANASE ` 460 'UMI S f - . HUNTING`-CON P,,,Y -BOARD OF DIRECTORS y RO.Y FULLER� TREASURER 280 OMIT s ww . �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The document you are viewing contains additional information that is not possible to produce electronically. For information on how to locate this document for viewing , please contact or visit the City Clerk's Office for assistance . 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor — City Hall Huntington Beach CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 /03 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL-ACTION Submitted by H. E. Hartge Public Works �'� Department Date Prepared August 14 , 1978 Backup Material Attached Fx Yes No Subject Requirement for Installation of Street Improvements City Administrator'sqommentst LA(�L If the City Council concurs , the attached Ordinance should be approved for introduction. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: Councilman Thomas requested that the City Council and not the Director of Public Works be the authority to allow a delay in the installation of street improvements where practical difficulties exist. Recommended Action: If the City Council concurs, the attached Ordinance should be approved for introduction. Analysis: i The present ordinance allows for the Director of Public Works to approve a. delay in the installation of street improvements where practical difficulties exist. Those situations in the past have included: i (1) No grade established for the street; e.g. Ellis Avenue between Gothard St. and Goldenwest Street. (2) Improvements would cause a drainage problem to owners of adjoining properties; e.g. Sycamore St. has very little slope and the installation of the curb and gutter would result in ponded water in the street for a distance of at least 200 feet. (3) Lots 35 feet or less in width isolated from improved streets. The cost of street improvements over such a narrow frontage is Quite severe due to move-in and move-out charges. The proposed Ordinance transfers to the City Council the responsibility of approving a request for a delay to install street improvements. Alternatives: Do not change the ordinance. Funding Source: No City funds involved. Pio sns HEH: jy L ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING -THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY' AMENDING SECTION 9730. 6 THEREOF PERTAINING TO INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby amended by amending Section 9730. 6 thereof to read as follows : 9730. 6 INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS.' EXCEPTIONS . The requirements set out in Section 9730. 4 shall not apply in the following instances : (a) Where a detached single-family dwelling is constructed on a lot abutting an arterial highway, street improvements on said arterial highway shall include curb , gutter, sidewalk, street trees and -street lights., sewer and water main extensions , and ten (10) feet of street paving to Department of Public Works requirements . Further, temporary paving shall be installed to join existing street improvements . EXCEPTION: homes constructed as a part of a subdivision shall comply with requirements con- tained in Chapter 99 of this code. (b ) Where practical difficulties arise, a request may be made to the City Council, requesting per mission to install improvements at a later date. The request stating reasons therefor, shall be in writing. If, in the opinion of the City Council a practical difficulty exists , he it may approve the request provided: (1) An agreement is entered into with the City agreeing to install said improvements on a certain date . (2 ) Said agreement shall be secured by a good and suf- ficient bond or cash deposit, unless waived or. otherwise directed by the City Council. ( 3) Said bond or cash deposit shall be in an amount equal to the cost of improvements as established by the Director of Public Works . SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause same to be 'published within fifteen days of its passage in the Huntington Beach News , a JG:ps 7/25/78 1. newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1978. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: C ' y Administrator City Attorney �,�- INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director gr Public Works 2. ORDINANCE NO. e43 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9730. 6 THEREOF PERTAINING TO INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby amended by amending Section 9730. 6 thereof to read as follows : 9730. 6 INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS. EXCEPTIONS . The requirements set out in Section 9730. 4 shall not apply in the following instances : (a) Where a detached single-family dwelling is constructed on a lot abutting an arterial highway, street improvements on said arterial highway shall includecurb , gutter, sidewalk, street trees and street lights , sewer and water main extensions , and ten (10) feet of street paving to Department of Public Works requirements . Further, temporary paving shall be installed to join existing street improvements . EXCEPTION: homes constructed as a part of a subdivision shall comply with requirements con- tained in Chapter 99 of this code. (b ) Where practical difficulties arise , a request may be made to the City Council, requesting permission to install improve- ments at a later date. The request stating reasons therefor, shall be in writing. If, in the opinion of the City Council a practical difficulty exists , it may approve the request provided: (1) An agreement is entered into with the City agreeing to install said improvements on a certain date. (2) Said agreement shall be secured by . a good and suf- ficient bond or cash deposit, unless waived or otherwise directed by the City Council. ( 3) Said bond or cash deposit shall be in an amount equal to the cost of improvements as established by the Director of Public Works . SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published within fifteen days of its passage in the Huntington Beach News , a JG:ps 7/25/78 1. newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in i Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held, on the day of 1978. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: AAj L50��--L ty Administrator City Attorney C INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director f Public Works r AF 2. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 1 I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of member$ of. the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the _ day of 19 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19 and was passed and adopted. by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmen: NOES: Councilmen: f —J ABSENT: Councilmen: City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California �a r P _-- WHITE-CITY ATTORNEYFIE BLUE'-CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH No.GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR.• CANARY -DEPARTMENTAL „a�n„croneu<e REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date,r- Request made by ��. ;Department a' ^ Public Works ti INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as,p`ossible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced: Print or type facts necessary for City Attorncy's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared an approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. .„:4: Areparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: An amendment to Section 9730.6 substitUting the City Council in lieu of the Director of P01 c Works to approve a 4elay in the installation of street improvements." Attached is a copy of the auggested changes 4 s - �. 'h . I . t'. ` Desired effective'date 'Signed: Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by,' y� C, Citv Administrator - . & " �� ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BLEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ��0� ��a�e�� X) HUNTINGTON BEACH ' � �� /)�C To Floyd G. Belsito From H. E. Hart ge li Subject Off site Improvements at Date April 11 , 1979 18811 Crystal Street At the City Council meetingof April 2, 1979, a re resentative of Ecology Tire Co. located at the southwest corner of crystal and Ernest requested that they be allowed to postpone the installation of street improvements at that location when they expand their business. The Mayor directed that we meet with the gentlemen and to report back to the City Council. Mike Zambory and I met with Michael Ramsey and Gregg Gillen and explained their available options per ordinance code. Per Section S9730. 6 (b) a written request dated April 10, 1979 was made to approve a delay for construction of the street improve- ments without posting a bond or cash deposit. This waiver of a bond or cash deposit can only be made by• the City Council. The practical difficulty which existsis that grades are not set for those two streets at that location. The grades will be set when the construction plans for the new alignment of Gothard Street are prepared. It is anticipated those plans will be prepared by the end of 1979 and work should commence in the spring of 1980. i The decision as to requiring a bond or cash to secure the later improvements must be made by -the City Council. Since the agreement is recorded with the County Recorder it does become a lien on the property and,therefore, the City' s interest is protected. If the City Council is in agreement with the waiver of depositing a bond or cash deposit appropriate action would be to direct staff to prepare the agreement for execution at a later City Council meeting. If the City Council is not in agreement with the waiver of a bond or cash deposit appropriate action would be to direct staff to pre- pare the agreement accordingly for execution at a later City Council meeting. H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:mc i Oe HAND DELIVERED 44"r ?&e "Specializing in Truck Tire Recycling" P.O.Box 1.93 - Westminster,California 92683 (714) 848-8260 'I I I April, 10, 1979 City of Huntington Beach Director, of Public Works 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, California 9?648 Attention: H. E. (Bill) Hartge & Michael Zambory i Re: Improvement--Delay. 18811 Crystal Street Gen tlepersons: As you know, .Ecology Tire Company, Inc. desires to expand its existing storage yard from its existing one- half "acre .by an ,additional one-half" acre thus utilizing the full one-acre lot The City has indicated that such addi- tional use would be a .non-conforming use under Article 971 of Division 9 of the Huntington Beach Code. In our opinion such use is expressly permitted by Chapter 95, Article 951, Section 9511 (j) and the lot's current M1 Zoning. It 'has been suggested that the matter might be amicably resolved by issuance of a Use Permit allowing Ecology Tire Company, Inc. to expand its storage yard to the full" lot. In order to obtain such Use Permit, however, it has been indicated that Section 9730,4 of Article 973 must be com- plied with and, in particular, the installation of streets, curbs, and gutters. We have been advised, however, that the City of Huntington Beach has not yet decided the design grade or width to govern construction of streets and appurtances in the area. It would, therefore, be impractical and indeed impossible to perform the improvements currently. Such delay is authorized by Section 9730 .6 (b) of Article 973_ of Devision 9 of the Huntington Beach Code. Because of the un.- certainty as to the' time when improvements will be appropriate or even the nature of such and in view of the fact that Ecology Tire Company, Inc. is a small, locally .owned busi- ness, "it is requested that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach authorize and direct the Director of Public Works to defer compliance with the conditions numbered 1, 2, and 3 of Section 9730. 6 (b) and approve the delay in .construe- tion of improvements without performing the enumerated con- ditions at this time. r 9 "Specializing in Truck Tire Recycling" P.0. Box 1093 - Westminster,California 92683 (714) 848-8260 City of Huntington Beach April 10, 1979 Page 2 We respectfully request that the City Council waive the requirement for the postiIng. of a bond or cash deposit per Section 9730. 6 (b) (2) . Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours-,. ECOLOGY TIRE COMPANY, INC... By Michael Ramsey, Pr ident .-z MR:mkk —Pay,c.-a ,✓ REQUE­or FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by H. E . Hartge , Di.rector,fJ` apartment Public Works ` Date Prepared February 22 , 1979 Backup Material Attached F1Yes No Subject Adoption of Ordinance to Change Street Names and Speed Limits City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. 355E Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue : An Ordinance is required to amend the speed limits on certain streets and to make other corrections as needed. Recommendation : It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance Number amending Sections 10 . 12 . 030 , 10 . 12 , 040 , and 10 . 12 . 050 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code , changing the name Mansion Avenue to Yorktown Avenue where necessary, and changing the, Prima facie speed limit on certain streets . Analysis : A traffic and engineering survey was performed on certain streets and the results of those surveys indicate that a reduction of the posted speed limit is appropriate and warranted. A summary of the changes to the Code areoas follows : 1 . Section 10 . 12 . 030 - Thirty-five m.p .h. prima facie speed limit : Subsection (1) - The name Mansion Avenue is changed to Yorktown Avenue . Subsection (m) - Delete and re -letter the remaining subsections . Subsection (q) - Extend the limits of Yorktown Avenue from 17th Street to Goldenwest Street. 2 . Section 10 . 12 . 040 - Forty m.p .h. prima facie speed limit : Subsection (d) - Change Lake Avenue to Lake Street. Subsection (f) - Extend the limits of Center Avenue to Beach Boulevard. Subsection (i) - Change the speed limit of Edwards Street between Slater and Garfield Avenues from 45 m.p .h. to 40 m.p .h. Subsection (n) - Change the speed limit of Goldenwest Street between McFadden and Garfield Avenues from 45 m.p .h. to 40 m.p .h. Subsection (o) - Delete and re -letter the remaining subsections . Subsection (u) - Change Mansion Avenue to Yorktown Avenue . PIO 3/78 o Request for Council Action FEbruary 22 , 1979 Page 2 . 3 . Saction 10 . 12 . OS0 - Forty-five m.p .h. prima facie speed limit . Subsection (g) - Delete and re-letter the remaining subsections . Subsection (j ) - Delete and re-letter the remaining subsections . Subsection (m) - Change the limits of Magnolia Street as a result of de-annexation. Alternate Action: Take no action and retain the existing Ordinance . Funding Source : Speed limit sign changes will be paid for from the Public Works Depart- ment Street Sign budget . Estimated cost is $200 . 00 . HEH:RRL :ek rr the Desk of . . . RON LACHER .105 + . c1 vw � JNCity of Huntington Beach�� U3 5Z. I P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN APPROVED By CITY CTITeCIL - --.w TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ........ ..... ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator y FROM: H. E. Hartge., Director. of Public Wor 's"7 ---- ~-- . DATE: August 8 , 1977 SUBJECT: Professional Services Contract for Pavement Investigation- and Evaluation i STATEMENT: The. Department of Public Works has received written proposals from the available qualified consultants for pavement investi- gation and evaluation on Edinger and Springdale Streets , and has conducted discussions with them- regarding the complexity of this project. Two (2) proposals were received and are listed in order of preference. 1. LaBelle Consultants $13, 600 .00 2 . H. V. Lawmaster & Co: - Inc. $29; 700 .99 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Select LaBelle Consultants, instruct the Department of Public 1� Works and th consultant, and authorize the Cit Cler execute e final agree en• . ANALY I The professional services are required in - order to conduct an. investigation and evaluation study of existing pavement on Edinger' and between Gothard Street and Bdlsa Chica Street and on Springdale Street between McFadden Avenue and Heil Avenue. These streets are approximately 10 to 15 years old, and are showing signs of failure, which will require extensive repair work. - The' City does' not have the sophisticated equipment required to conduct such a study. At the July 5 City Council meeting the formal "Special Services" procedures were waived and the Director of Public Works was in structed to obtain proposals' under' the procedures for "General Services . " FUNDING SOURCE: This contract service will- be financed from the City Gas Tax- Fund. HEH :JWW: jy I � G C fi h'F � r LOCATION_ OF _PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION m J � s e -o ♦ TILKIT ------------- i� �♦ a. e S on ---�— .CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - �'E ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA �e o I REQUEST FOR CITY C®UNUL ACTION ,Qpw H. E. Hartge / Public Works Submitted by Department Date Prepared Dec- 20 , 19 7 8 Backup Material Attached Fx I Yes No Subject Right of Way Certification Talbert Ave. Street Widening; AHFP #719 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. l � i Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: 0�J Statement of Issue: P In order to call for bids for the subject project, the City Council must certify that all necessary right of way for the project has been acquired and that no additional right of way is necessary. Recommendation: Approve the attached right, of way certification and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign. Analysis: The Department of Public Works is in the process of preparing the contract documents necessary to call for bids on the above project. Because a portion of this project is being financed under the Arterial Highway Financing Program, we must submit a certified statement to the County of. Orange indicating that all needed right of way has been acquired and that no building improvement or utility exists within the right of way that would interfere with the construction. The certification must be in the form of the attached. Funding Source: No funds required. HEH:CBD: jy Attach. rio sns 6� RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION The City of Huntington Beach hereby certifies in connection with the right of way for Project A.H.F.P. 719 that: 1. All right of way has been acquired, or all work is within existing right of way and no additional right of way is necessary. 2 . No building improvement or utility exists within the right of way area which will interfere with construction. In making this certification, the City of Huntington Beach agrees to hold the County harmless from any liability which may y arise by reason of the County' s reliance upon this Certificate ti and its use of said rights' of way. �I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By ti Mayor Date : U ATTEST: City Clerk • I 1 � III 111- ' li 6J�J__)'�_�� �I { - -- }- '?Ii 1 ' it 6 7 - I f _ I I r i I I f t iL.OcAk lov r F E I ' j I +JL� JJ L 1-• ,�ir�HiO UH �'� .�., r L:I 1 � I 4-ram I I' �_.1 �- I __._. I'. I l_.•{i t , �•i�l 1 ./ r 1, I 1 al-,ra ,�w -i---- i� 1 i � I r•. t- - 1 !IL I _ , I - jC 5 J. ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To City Councilmembers and From Alicia M—Wentworth City Administrator City Clerk Subject Letter from Paul Ledbetter Re: Date Septmber 20, 1978 Project at 17680 Cameron Street Attached is a letter received from Mr. Paul Ledbetter regarding the problems he has encountered in his project located at 17680 Cameron. Street. Mr. Ledbetter stated that he will inform this office early next week as to whether he wishes his letter placed on the 10/2/78 Agenda. CC: Fire Chief Planning Director C A99 �� CITY CLERK t CITY of " 14UNTING T GN Er) ',CH C . n d September 19, 1978 City Council City of Huntington Beach Dear Council Members: My friend and I decided a number of months ago to invest our life savings in a small project located in Huntington Beach at 17680 Cameron. Before we closed escrow we came to the City Planning Department and explained our project which is a lot 64 ft. wide and 309 feet deep. The lot currently has a four unit apartment building located near the center of the property. We wanted to add six more units to make a total of ten. The staff explained the development standards and restrictions for development, we were told a 20 ft. driveway would be acceptable (this is the maximum space available between the existing building and the property line) . We prepared preliminary plans and submitted them to the City with the request for approval (see attachment #1 for schematic drawing of preliminary plans . Two weeks later we were told that the staff had forgotten to inform us that a negative declaration would be required prior to our hearing. This was prepared and sub- mitted. Two weeks later we were told that the staff had forgotten to advertise our hearing. Finally after many frustrating weeks we were granted a hearing at which time we were told that because one of our parking spaces was 6" too narrow we would have to eliminate one unit. The Fire Marshall informed us that he would require a 25 ft. 'driveway or we must install fire sprinkler systems which exceed the requirements of the building code (see attached copy of building code which requires only 20 ft. access for a 1 ,000 seat auditorium) , or he would not allow us to develop our property (see attached copy of letter dated 8-29-78 signed by Mel Ott, attachment #2) . In order to provide the 25 ft. driveway the Fire Marshall ordered us to obtain an easement from the neighbors lot and install a large T head turn around for fire truck access (see attachment #3) . After three weeks of struggling to abide by the guidelines we came back to the Fire Marshall to ask if the drawings. as shown as Attachment #3 would be approved, he then stated it was unacceptable and we would have to have a 45 ft. driveway. Mr. Girshback stated that he did not solve problems he made problems. We were shocked to hear a city employee make a statement of this type. After spending many months attempting to solve the problems placed upon us by the Fire Marshall 's Office and the Planning Department we were about to give up and admit that we would be unable to -develop our property. We noticed however, that our neighbors with identical shaped lots were being allowed to develop apparently without having to conform to the same set of restrictions placed upon us. We noticed that the lot at 17661 Cameron (attachment #4) had 12 units with only 22 parking spaces where 24 should have been provided (note that we were t required to remove one unit because one of our spaces was 6" too narrow) . This development has no recreational space like we were required to provide, the drive- way is only 20 ft. between low roof eaves , it has no turn around as we were required to provide, the rear 8 units (two buildings) have absolutely no access by fire department vehicles , this development may exceed the permitted land area coverage) . -1- t � ' The development located at 17610 Cameron (see attachment #5) has a 20 ft. wide driveway extending over 250 ft. without the turn around that the Fire Marshall required us to provide. There is no evidence of the required recreational area at this location. The project located at 17592 Cameron (see attachment #6) has a large rear building completely inaccessible to fire department vehicles , and there is no evidence of the required turn around space or required recreational space. These are only three examples of new developments which are located immediately adjacent to our property. There are dozens of other situations that we have found in Huntington Beach where the Fire Marshall and Planning Department have failed to require the same thing that they have required us to provide. We have presented documented evidence signed by the Fire Marshall 's Office and the Planning Department placing requirements on us that they have failed to ask others to do. We respectfully ask your Honorable Council to investigate why these employees are participating in discrimatory practices . There are only two reasons which are apparent to us , one is abject incompetence and the other should be obvious . These practices have already cost us thousan s of dollars and may cost us our life savings . /�Uo Bob Fowler Paul Led etter 16762 Rhone Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 cc: City Manager s I � i I• i f -2- y n .10 LD►►.1Lj I i -A 7 6 U i='1 rZ 7ataoz ; 702.7051, Cha ter 7 (c) Division 4 I)rovisions. Erection and structural maintenance of p structures housing Division 4 Occupancies shall conform to the I REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP B OCCUPANCIES requirements of this Co(le. Stntctures housing Division 4 Oc•c•ulmncies, other than those of Group Q Occupancies Defined l open skeleton fr;one type, w}icn more than one story in height or •100 Sec. 701. Croup 13 Occupancies shall he: square feet in area, sh;ell lac of not less than one-hour fire-resistive Division 1.Any building or portion of a building having an asseml)ly construction. 11'hen the space under a Division 4 Occ•upanc}- is used room with an occupant load of less than 1000 and a stage• for any purpose, it shall be separated from all parts of such Division 4 Division 2.Any huildingor portion ofa building having;un;assembly Occupancy, inducting exits, by walls, floors, and ceilings of not less room with an occupant load of 300 or more se ithout a stage, including Ihan one hour fire resistive construction. such buildings lased for educational purposes and not (•hissed as a Grandstands or blc;a(•hers eniployint; comlmstil,le meml)ers in the a Croup C or Group h, Division 2 Occupancy. structural frame shall he limited to 1 I rotes or 9 feet in height. Scat- Division:3.:1ny building or portion of a lntildius havint all:asscnthlt hoards, toelma ds, bearing or Imse pads and footl)oards may lie of 1 combustible materials. room u oc tvitlt : t cup; a utt Imd of less than 300 tt ithuut ;a si;agc'. inchulittg 1 such buildings used for educational purposes :and Writ chased ;is :a \Then the space under a Division 4 Occupancy is used for env Croup C or Group F, Ditision 2 Oc-cupancy. purpose, inducting exits, it shall he separated front all parts of such Division 4.Staditnms, reviett ant;stands,and immsement park "true- Iivision 4 We-tipa acy,in(•Inding exits,I)s walls,floor and ceiling of nut construction.h h;m one- our (ire resistive totes not include(] tt itlain Croup :1 nor Divisions 1, °, ,uad :3, Croup It less t • Occupancies. Specific find general rne'eneral requirents for '„t'andstands, EXC EPTIONS: I. faits under tvniporan• grand%tanels need not 1)e bleachers and reviewing stands are to lie found in (:lea (•,pt 33. scparjWd. t 2. The•nndersnle o!cant inuuus steel deck ga andstan4,As hen crec•ted ' For Uccupuucy separations see haf>le No. 5 I3. orttdr,c,n need not be fiacprotec•ted %%hen cx•e•ut)icd fur public° toilets, ! For occupant load see Section 3301. The I3atilding Oflic•i,al max cimse all Division 4 slnactures to he reiu- Construction, Height, and Allowable Area s1>ected at Ic.rst once escry sip months. Sec. 702. (;t) General. Buildings or parts of buildings (-];used in Location on Property Croup B liec•uuse of the use or character of the occ-upancy shall ter limited to the Ivpes of construction set forth in•l'ablc•s \o.5-(:and No. See. 70:1. All buildings housing Croup 13 Occupancies shall front 5-1) and shall not ex,eed, in ;urea or height, the limits specified it% (lirec•tly upon or have:aecc ss to;t public street not less than 20 feet in Sections 505, 506, and 507. %width.•1 he:arc rss to the pubic-street shall be:a mi mmin 2040ot tt ide 1 FXCEPTIO\: Division 4 structures of open skeleton frame hpe right-of-tt;ry unubstrucled and maintained only as access to the puldic wilhuut roof,cos'cr,or enclosed usable spaces,shall not he]united raa area street.The main entraiwe to the building;shall he located uu the public or height. ; street or on tit(, ac•e•ess tsav, (b) Special Provisions. Stages and enclosed platforms as defined in For fire-resistive protection of exterior walls and openings,as deter- Sections 417 and 420 shall be constructed in accordance with Chapter mined by location on property, see Section 504 and Part V. 39. I A fire-resistive ceiling shall not he required in one-story Imildings Exit Facilities of Type Iil, 11', or 1' construction having an open frame root Sec. 70-1. (a) General. Stairs, exits, anc] smokeproof enclosures shall Division 2 Occupancies with an occupant load of 1000 or more shall be provided as spec•ificct in Chapter 33. (Sec also Section 3316.) Ile of Type i, 11, Ill One-hour, III Heavy Timber or 11•' Onc-hour (b) Anatsement Stnu•tures. EAits and exit sit;w; For Division 4, construction. I Amusement Stntctures,sh;tll be approved by the Building Official auttl, Division 3 Occupaneics located in a basement or :above the first where prac•ti"thle, shall comply with the requirements specified ill story shall he of not lass th;un one-hour fire-resistive: construction. Chapter 33. Croup 13 assembly rooms havint: ;ut occupant loud of 1000 or more i Light, Ventilation, and Sanitation Shall not he located in the basement. i { Division 3 Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or Wrote,tchicln t Sec.70.5. All portion%of Croup 13 0ecupancies customarily Ilse(]by are located over usable sp;tcc, shall be separated from such space by human beings and all dressing rooms shall bc• provided is ith natural or not less than one-hour fire-resistive construction, artificial light,vcntilation,ancl sanitary facilitiesits specificdinSections For attic space partitions an(I draft stops see Section 3205. tt 605 and 1711. 60 61 Paul Ledbetter B. P. & R. Properties 16762 Rhone Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Dear Mr. Ledbetter Prior to the issuance of a building permit for your project on Cameron, we will require that you sbumit a letter agreeing to install a fire sprinkler system in excess of the requirements as outlined in the Uniform Building Code for construction of buildings of this size and occupancy. In lieu of this additional requirement of a sprinkler system, we will require that you submit proof of a recorded reciprocal easement a minimum of 25 feet in width with the property abutting to the north. The available 20 foot wide driveway on the property is not acceptable for access. This easement is being required by the Fire Department as additional access to the rear of the property. The easement must contain a "T" layout as illustrated on the attached plans dated July 15, 1978. 411Dated. - Z ��/ �i� ' Kel Ott � z9-7k Pat Spenc 1 1= t.1T'�:C�TO►: r.7=A G p� I , I ' f I � 25� 1 CITY OF HUWIN.-:.- H FIRE DEPARTt.'cNT OR�v{ �C�`���,✓o P�� �I A P P R n`�E () � ,r 97_-.2 4_ T` 1�"-r s p g g // // - BY T111E _T��G.tr � I , 9- F 1 R A-C C ESS EAS E: /AE V,, TG A TT N T 1 c ,r rz t E -c w - '.�.2 ram, L �.. •�.� � ,>"' �"�'.�is% " ti 17 6 1 G /1\,i-C) H. -- AT T R G H /A E N T �-- J 5 1 i kT- u_ tti D ai-= ATT )s4,, H //\ F— NT U �J 1 T S /tT A77A G H /AY--. t 1T r—f Ile REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted P by . H. E. Hartge Department Public Works -- � Date Prepared Jan. 5 119 79 Backup Material Attached © Yes No Subject The Reconstruction of Edinger Ave. and Springdale St. ; CC-425 City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended. APPROVED BY CITy C(jUNCX ---------------------------- CITY CL Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: The Orange County Transportation Commission has approved the use of Federal` B Aid Urban Funds for the rehabilitation of Edinger Ave. and Springdale Street.. Because of the current workload, the City engineering staff cannot do the required engineering work within the time frame established by the Orange County Transportation Commission. Recommendation: Authorize a Request for Proposals from consulting engineers for the prepara- tion of plans and specifications for the rehabilitation of Edinger Ave. and Springdale Street. Analysis: At the Council meeting of Oct. 16 , 1978 the City Council adopted resolution 4692 which requested the Orange County Transportation Commission to include the rehabilitation of portions of Edinger Ave. and Springdale St. into the Orange County Federal Aid Urban Program. The City was recently notified that the Orange County Transportation Commission will include this project in the Federal Aid Urban Program. The City was also notified that the necessary engineering work must be started immediately so that the project will be ready to be advertised for bids as soon as the Federal Aid Urban Program has been reviewed by SCAG, CalTrans, and the Federal Highway Admin- istration. This review is expected to be completed by April of 1979 . Due to the current workload, the City engineering staff is not able to complete the required engineering work by this deadline; therefore, it is necessary to retain a consulting engineer. Since this 1. 2 million dollar project will be funded 83% by the Federal Aid Urban Program, it is in the City' s best interest to move ahead quickly rather than risk loss of the Federal monies. The required engineering work I is estimated to cost $25, 000 . 00. Pio ane �® x � n L Request for Council Action January 5,. 1979 Page 2 Alternative: Hire additional City staff to provide the needed engineering services. Funding Source: The rehabilitation of Edinger and Springdale is estimated to cost 1 . 2 million dollars. The Federal Aid Urban Program will fund $996, 000 and the City is to fund $204 , 000. 00 . The Federal Aid Urban Program requires that the City pay for any engineering cost expended prior to award of the construction contract; therefore, both the $25, 000 engineering cost and the $204 , 000 City share of the construction cost will be funded from the City' s Gas Tax fund. HEH:RLL: jy I E i vvo � AMENDMENTS fAMH CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL Szia— LObaGn. ---- F STREETS AND HIGHWAYS � ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL II II RESOLUTION NO 4368-DEC 12,1976 l, LEGEND _-_- FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY MAJOR 45,000 PRIMARY 30,000 --- �� - - SECONDARY 20,000 NOTE' SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY -' DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO A \ RIGHT OF 'NAY EXISTS \ j II �--- o�� rF / I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - -_ ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA / I fe-w 9 �03 GAS TAX FUND Revenue 1402 Interest Income $ 160,000 1403 State Tax - 2107 755,000 1404 State Tax 2107.5 10,000 1405 State Tax 2106 870,000- Federal Government (FAU) 515, 500 County of Orange (AHFP) 909,500 City of Westminster 16,200 General Fund, 91700 Developers 8,000 Total S 3 ,253,900 Expenditures Transfer to General Fund $ 755,000 ' Yorktown Street Widening - Main to Reach 710 ,000 Talbert Street Widening - Gothard to Newland 426,000 McFadden Street Widening - Gothard to Sean Diego Fr%.jy 139,000 Saybrook St . Improvements - Edinger to Santa Barbara 302 ,500 Springdale St . Widening - Bolsa to Glenwood 380 ,000 Frankfort Reconstruction 82 ,000 Yorktown St. Widening - 300' E/O to 500' E/O Beach 150,000 Newland Sidewalk Construction 11 ,000 Trudy Woodstock Storm Drain 300,000 Michal Drive Storm Drain 175 ,000 Old Twon Storm Drain Pahse III 380,000 Rogers , Herbert , Kern Storm Drain 50,000 Kenilworth, Vineland Storm Drain 50,000 Street Maintenance Program 500.000 l Edinger Ave. Traffic Signal Interconnect , 620 ,500 Construct 4 traffic signals 212 ,000 Misc. Traffic and Operational Improvements 333,900 Total $ 5,608,900 Deficit to be funded from $3,094,065 in unappropriated fund balance $ 2 ,355,000 Recap: Revenue $3 ,253 ,900 Unappropriated Fund Balance 2 ,355,000 Total $ 5,608,900 Expenditures $ 5 ,608,900 I , I / y REQUE6T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION �oz Submitted by H. E. H a r t g e Department Public Works Date Prepared August 30 , 1978 Backup Material Attached a Yes ❑ No Subject Appraisal Services for Slater Avenue (CC-434) City Administrator's Comments APPROV,BD By CITY COUNC}% I' Approve as recommended. _._..... 71 C . QT CLE 7 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: j Statement ot Tssue: In order to acquire right of way for Slater Avenue (CC-:434) , it is necessary to obtain an updated appraisal of the property required for the project. An original appraisal was done in 1974 by Michael P. Locke and included 36 parcels of land. To date, there are 19 parcels remaining to be acquired by the. City and the appraisal update must be completed prior to negotiating with the property owners. Recommendation: Award the appraisal service - to Michael P. Locke in an amount not to exceed $3 ,400. 00. Analysis: The following quotations were received from qualified appraisers to perform this service: 1. Michael Locke ASA, SRA $3, 400. 00 j 2. Cedric White MAI $4 , 750. 00 3. Jack R. Strobel MAI Declined It was indicated by appraisers 2 and 3 that they could not testify as to the opinions contained in Mr. Locke' s original appraisal of 1974 and that the only way they could complete an accurate report would be to originate a new appraisal at a substantially higher cost. For this reason having Mr. Locke update his original report at the lowest price appears to be the most j reasonable choice. I Funding Source: i The cost of this work will be paid ft.om City and County Gas Tax Funds. . i � HEH:CBD: jy I P10 3178 .vf . F 4 F I \` I \ �v u.Tp .rE T t![NT \ Iv 7r `\ 'vim �•—_- ( we ' r \ TaITON., f CITY OF HUNTINGT'ON BEACH - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA iI(fT "r I i V 1 �® City ®f Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT i TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: H. E. Hartge, Director of Public Works,olfi�- DATE: November 9, 1977 SUBJECT: Center Drive Street Improvements At the San Diego Freeway; CC-367, andddeue Widening - Gothard -Street an Diego Diego Freeway; CC-300 STATEMENT. OF PROBLEM: In order to call. for .bids for the sub7ect, project, the City Council must certify .that. all necessary, right-of-way for the projects has been' completed in accordance with the requirements of the Arterial Highway .Firiancing Program (AHFP) . RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Right-of-Way Certifications and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign. ANALYSIS: The' Department of Public Works is in the process of preparing the contract documents necessary to call for bids for the above projects, Both projects will be financed in part from County Funds under the Arterial Highway Financing Program. As a requirement of the program, the City Council must certify that all right-of-way for the projects has been acquired or that the work will be .performed within existing right-of-way. Additionally, no building improvement or utility can exist within the right.-of-way that would interfere with the construction. The certification must be in the' form of the attached. FUNDING SOURCE: These "are budgeted projects funded from AHFP z-ind Gas Tax Funds . HEH:JRR:lw d_ iyt EXHIBIT 9 a RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION 1 The City of Huntington' Beach hereby cerfifies in connection with the right of way for the improvement of McFadden Avenue between Gothard Street and the San Diego (Route 405) Freeway that:. 1. * All 'right of way has been acquired. 2 . The following do exist within the right of way area; a) two electric utility power poles; . b) Railroad crossing gates; but will be removed before the contractor enters to perform the construction and no delay. will be occasioned to the contractor by these obstructions. In making this certification, the City of Huntington Beach agrees to hold the County harmless from any liability which may arise by reason of the Couhty' s reliance upon this Certificate and its use i of said rights of way. CITY OF HUNTINGTON H Date: li7 B ~� Mayo Date: _ By i lerk i 1 0-3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH [% i. :r' 1978 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION CITY OF HUNTiNGTON BtACI HUNTINGTON BEACH AD14IRIf> TIV OFFICI: To Bud Belsito From H. E. Hartge Subject Street Failure at Hamilton Ave. Date March 17 , 1978 � � -� and St. John Lane This is a follow-up to my memo dated March 7 , 1978 to Dick Harlow ` concerning the above referenced topic. The failure. of the street at St. John and Hamilton appears to have been caused by the settlement of -soil under a storm drain pipe installed in 1968 as a part of Tract 6332 developed by the Buccola Co. The. settlement caused a pipe joint to open permitting storm water in the .pipe and ground water to erode the soil above the pipe. This erosion resulted in a void under the street which caused the street to fail. Because of the great potential for further damage, authorization was given to repair the street and the pipe under the emergency pro- curement procedure of the Municipal Code. Bebec Construction .Co. the contractor building the . Delaware Storm Drain, was hired on a force account basis to make the repairs. Although the repairs were first estimated to cost in the range of $5 , 000 , the contractor encountered a number of problems which added to the cost. The contractor encountered ground water which required 3 pumps operating 24 hrs. a day to drain the excavation. Special care had to be taken to protect the adjacent private property. Also over- head utility lines interfering with the excavation equipment and the continued caving of the sandy soil into the excavation increased the I time required to make the repair. The repair is now almost- completed and the final cost is estimated to be $15 ,000 . It appears that this work can be funded from Gas Tax fund-s and with your approval we will charge it against that account. Also the City has made a request for Disaster Relief from the Federal Government to fund this repair. . E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:RLL: jy �• ' CITY OF H` NTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION WNTINGTON BEACH To Floyd G. Belsito From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Director of Finance Subject Financial Impact Report - Date March 16, 1978 Emergency Storm Drain Repair In response to a request from the Public Works Department to prepare a Financial Impact Report on the above subject, I am submitting the attached. At the present time there are funds available in the City's contingency account (101593) which may be used for this project if the' City Council so desires. The current balance in the contingency account would be $87,849.54 (if this request for $15,000.00 is approved) . This project appears to be eligible for funding from the 2107 portion of the Gas Tax Fund. - Therefore, it is my recommendation that this funding be used instead of the contingency account. f F. B. Arguel.l ' Director of Finance FBA/EH/cg cc: H. E. Hartge, Director, Public Works r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Emergency Storm Drain Repair __�_� Description Perform emergency repairs to a 33Y storm drain at the south east corner of Hamilton and St. John Streets 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs Land Turn. , aci i- Acquisition Construction ties, E ui ment, Other Total Cost 15,000.00 15,000.00 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs Additional Materials utside Payroll Personnel Supgl.ies Services Rev nues Total Cos 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs The street and storm drain will be restored and last as long as new con- struction with routine annual maintenance. At the present time all work has been completed with the exception of the asphalt and concrete work to be done by City forces within the next two weeks. There is a chance that part of the costs might be paid by the federal government under rrr.� Disaster Assistance programs. il. 2. INDIRECT COSTS None - I I Financial Impact Repw Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS o None 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT The street and storm drain will be repaired to normal and the storm drain will be able to eliminate flooding in the area. 5. PROJECT USAGE The residents of the area served by the storm drain and street. 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING As soon as approved. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT _ Cost of the work already done by Bebek Construction Co. under the emergency section of the Municipal Code (3.02. 190 (a) (4) . The City could have" been responsible for any figod damage and suits for iniury due to accidents from the cavity in the street right of way if repairs had not been done. . Additional damage to the storm drain and street could also have occurred. H CITY OF I-IIJNTING°t ON BEACH CA 7 7-12 8 ►j COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION . HUNTINGTON BEACH p� _ � 2 � To Honorable Mayor and From Richard, A. Harlow City Council Members Acting City Administrator Subject PARKING CONTROL RESOLUTIONS Date September 28 , 1977 The City Council . has allocated General Revenue Sharing funds to support a parking .control program that would enforce parking prohibitions on private streets and parking lots as well as on public streets on street sweeping days .. The Council has also adopted an ordinance which provides i that the City may; by resolution, agree to enforce .parkin.g regulations on private streets and parking lots at the request of the owners In order .,to activate the parking control program, a resolution naming those , privately owned areas must be adopted. In addition , a resolution naming the public streets where parking will be "prohibited on street sweeping days is desirable- for purposes of "public notification. RECOMMENDATION: . Adopt Resolutions No.. 4531 and 4532 , attached. ANALYSIS : The Police Department has been authorized five CETA positions to staff the program and so far has filled three of the positions . Four new vehicles were purchased for the program out of Revenue Sharing funds . FRequests' have been received from three planned residential development homeownerslassociations and a shopping center owner requesting enforce- ment of prohibitions against parking practices that would block emergency response Ivehicles or otherwise hinder traffic flow. The Traffic ' Engi- neering Division is working with the owners to explain how, at the owners ' expense , the parking regulations are to be posted. Enforcement in other privately owned areas will be undertaken after a reasonable trial period in the four initial areas . Warning notices will. be issued , ' during the first week of enforcement . " The second aspect of the program is control of parking on public streets on days scheduled for street sweeping. Two test areas , Meredith Gardens and Goldenwest Homeowners Association, have been selected for trial enforcement . Signs are being placed at all entrances to the test tracts , and enforcement will begin October 11. Notification .to residents in j. the test areas will be accomplished through homeowners' associations , i news .releases , signs , and. an initial period of. warnings being issued before citati"ons are written. The Police and Public Works Departments are working together on this aspect of the program and will recommend expansion to other areas of the- City as soon as practical: i CA 717-128 - 2 - September 28 , 1977 Since the enforcement program is staffed with CETA employees , its level of service will be dependent upon the availability. of CETA funds . It is hoped that in the case of street sweeping prohibitions , only occasional partrols will be, required once enforcement has been .established. Both aspects of the program will be monitored to determine whether revenue from fines may be sufficient to support regular employee staffing when CETA funds are withdrawn. Res fu ly ubmitte , chard A. Harlow Acting City Administrator RAH:DLC :bb Attachments 3/31/81 TO FILE: See file 103 - Streets General for other letters from Beachwalk and other Private communities regarding' private streets and enforcement. Resolutions involved: 2204 4531 4532 Other data is in 80 - Parking-Off-Street ®� CITV OF HUNTINGTON w INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Bud Belsito From Alicia M. Wentworth City Administrator City Clerk Subject Letter from La Cuesta Racquet Club Date September 12, 1977 Homeowners Association - Privately Owned Streets � Attached is a letter from th La rCuesta Racquet Club Homeowners Association regarding their flow problems on their privately owned streets and requesting enforcement of Ordinance 2204. Please inform this office as to the Council meting at which this item should appear so that we' may inform Mr. Emmert. Cc to: Fire Chief Picard Bill Hartge, Director of Public Works Ed Selich, Planning Director I P LA CUESTA RACQUET CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 617 Al Drive Huntington Beach, D D California 92648 E� 2 1977 September 1, 1977 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL OFFICE City Council City of Huntington Beach c% City Clerk Civic Center 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 The Board of Directors at the La Cuesta Racquet Club Homeowners, Associa- tion approved at a special meeting August 30, 1977, that our planned unit development located at Memphis Avenue and Delaware Street seek by ordinance or resolution the enforcement of Ordinance No. 2204 upon our privately owned streets. We have traffic flow problems due to the narrow 28 foot wide streets as per- mitted within the local building ordinance. Fire Chief, James Gerspach (HBFD) inspected our streets and found them too narrow to permit on street parking and still allow fire lane access as required by the fire department. Our streets are presently posted "No Street Parking - Violators cars will be towed away at owners expense - CVC 22658". We have not had the funds nor time to act with our own "policing force". We respectfully request your prompt consideration and approval for en- forcement of no parking regulations within our planned residential district. Please inform us regarding; the date our request will be considered on the Council 's Agenda, specific signing requirements for posting no street park- ing and the police department's method of enforcement. Respectfully Submitted, Fred L. Emmert, President La Cuesta Racquet Club Homeowners Association FE/bk Enclosure `.3rr� .� .ry ORDINANCE NO. 2204 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINDING AND DECLARING THAT THERE ARE PRIVATELY- OWNED AND MAINTAINED ROADS WITHIN THE CITY WHICH ARE GENERALLY HELD OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR PURPOSES OF VEHICULAR TRAVEL TO SERVE COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 10. 40.270 PERTAINING TO THE MAINTENANCE OF NO PARKING ZONES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 21107. 6 author- izes the City to find and declare by ordinance or resolution that there are privately owned-and maintained roads in the city which are generally held open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel to serve commercial establishments and planned residential, districts; and The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach determines that there exists certain commercial establishments and planned residential districts in the city of Huntington Beach which have areas of traffic congestion which are a danger to vehicles and pedestrians and constitute obstructions to emergency vehicles requiring the prohibition of parking; rand That written requests for the adoption. of this ordinance have been received from owners of commercial establishments and planned residential districts within the city, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : . SECTION 1. Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21107. 6', all provisions of the California Vehicle Code and the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 10 . 40, shall apply to those privately-owned and maintained roads that the City Council shall from time to time by resolution designate as having areas of traffic congestion which are a danger to vehicles and pedes- MT: cs 1. trians and constitute obstructions to emergency vehicles requiring the prohibition of parking. SECTION 2, The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto Section 10 .40.270 to read as follows : 10- 40. 270 Parking areas on privateproperty--Maintenance --Parking prohibited. a The owners of any private property in the city of Huntington Beach, which property has been declared by resolution of the city council to have areas of traffic congestion and a danger to vehicles and pedestrians and an obstruction of emergency vehicles, shall maintain the designated no parking and restricted parking areas by appro- priate signs and/or paint upon the curb surface according to standards established by the director of public works . (b ) When curb markings and/or signs are in place, no operator of any vehicle shall park said vehicle adjacent to any curb marking and/or sign. A violation of this section is an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100) . SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen days after adoption in the Huntington Beach News , a weekly news- paper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meetin thereof held on the 5 th day of July ., 1977 ATTEST: Mayor Alicia M, Wentworth City Clerk /4W&4 BY ,v Deputy INITIATED AND ePROVED APPROVED AS TO FORM: AS TO CONTENT: C y Administrator City A o ey M T f � j 2, . s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 7 7 -90 ? COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HVNTINGTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito �I City Council Members City Administrator Subject PARKING CONTROL ORDINANCE Date June 29, 1977 (ORDINANCE NO. 2204) Ordinance . No. 2204 was continued from the June 6 Agenda at the request of' Councilwoman Wieder who requested further information as to the need for the ordinance . The purpose of the ordinance is twofold: 1 . To control hazardous parking practices in commercial .parking lots and in planned residential developments. 2 . To control parking along streets on days scheduled for street sweeping. As to the first purpose , many drivers currently ignore painted curbs and signs indicating "No Parking" in front of stores and along fire lanes in private parking lots and in planned residential developments . Such parking practices present a safety hazard by blocking access to the emergency response vehicles to businesses and homes . Both shopping center management and condominium homeowners associations have requested that the City control these dangerous parking practices . Within the City the Fire Department , particularly, has expressed concern about the blocked access to their fire control and emergency medical units . As to the second purpose, - there has long been a concern , both from citizens and the Public Works Department , that the street sweeping operation -was considerably less effective than it might be because cars are often parked along the street and, thus , the street sweeper is unable to clean the curbs . This problem results in the street sweeper logging many miles while only cleaning part of the distance covered. In an effort to alleviate these two problems , I requested last year that staff formulate a program for parking control without adding additional permanent employees . Accordingly, the City Council was asked to approve $22 , 000 in Revenue Sharing funds for vehicles and signs for the program. These funds were approved on March 21 of this year. In addition, Bob Cunningham has begun recruiting parking control officers. who would effect the enforcement . The Fire Department has . contacted owners of shopping centers and planned residential developments who had previously voiced concern over the parking control problems to determine whether or not they would be willing to sign and paint curbs within their property in accordance with City standards . They were also asked to request formally in writing, once again, that the City undertake parking control activities . These steps have been taken by the property owners . � I CA 77 - 90 -2 - June 29 , 1977 PARKING CONTROL ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 2204) During the initial phases of the program, fewer than 10 commercial and planned residential parking areas would be patrolled by City forces.. In the area of street sweeping patrol , the program would be launched in two or three test tracts and only after the residents of the tracts were given adequate notice . In both the parking lot and the street sweeping areas , warning citations would be given before fines were actually levied. A similar program has been undertaken by the city of Fountain Valley. Huntington Beach' s program would rely on federal funding sources for at least the first year of operation and perhaps longer if those sources are still available . The parking control officers while increasing the safety to those in shopping centers and in PRD' s and while increasing the effectiveness of the City'.s street sweeping" operation would also be increasing fine revenue to the City. The level of this revenue would be monitored , and it is anticipated that the fines will eventually offset the total cost of the parking control program, even if it is not supported by CETA and Revenue Sharing money. In the long run , therefore , the program should enhance safety, increase street sweeping efficiency, and at the same time add no net cost to the City. RECOMMENDATION: .Adopt Ordinance No . 2204 .. Respectfully submitted , • /515c-.,�. Floyd Belsito City dministrator FGB :DLC :bb Attachment r , 03 O J, City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT June 1, 1977 D E D !uu 1 1977 Honorable Mayor and City Council `` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach `Q ` ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Attention: Floyd G. Belsito Y � City Administrator Subject: Master Plan of Median Landscaping Dear Council Members: At their meeting January 3, 1977 the City Council in response to an offer from Meredith Gardens requested the Public Works Dept. to prepare a Master Plan for landscaping medians throughout the City. The Council also requested consideration of the Meredith Gardens offer of $3500. 00 toward the landscaping of their frontage road median during the preparation of the 1977-78 budget. The Public Works Dept. has completed the Master Plan for the landscaping of all of the medians existing or planned for construc- tion within the City. This Master Plan is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission during the month of June, 1977. The submitted 1977-78 budget of the Public Works Dept.. included various median landscaping projects for Council consideration. How- ever, no costs accompanied these projects because of the Council' s recently expressed feelings regarding median landscaping, because of the current drought, and because of the shortage of available funds for such work. It is anticipated that the Planning Commission' s recommendation relative to the Master Plan of median landscaping will be on the Council' s agenda sometime in July. At that time the Public Works Dept, will have additional data including construction cost and maintenance cost figures for the Council' s consideration in further dealing with the Meredith Gardens proposal. This is a status report; therefore, no Council action is requested at this time. Very truly yours, 4.�E. Hartg Director of Public Works '' J HEH:MZ: jy s J, City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 27, 1977 APPROV;BYITY COUN cal, MAY 2 7 19%7Honorable Mayor , "�_19'7.�.and Council Members p CITY QF HUNTINGTON B �City of Huntington Beach ____^,L-: _ _ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE C I CITY CLL,RFK'� Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Professional Services Contract for Investigation and Evaluation of Existing Street Surfaces Dear Council Members: The Department of Public Works has prepared a request for proposal for professional engineering services to investigate and evaluate the condition of the existing pavement on Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Bolsa Chica Street and on Springdale Avenue between Heil Avenue, and McFadden Avenue. The cost of this service is expected to be $20, 000 .00 and will be payable from City Gas Tax Funds . The involved portions of Edinger Avenue and Springdale Street are approximately 10 to, 15 years old and are showing signs of fail- ure, which will require extensive repair work. The purpose of this request is to engage a private consulting firm to -investigate, . evaluate and recommend the appropriate remedial work to extend the life of these streets . The City does not have the sophisticated equipment required to conduct such a study. Due to the limited .scope of the investigation, this office requests the City Council to waive the provisions of the formal "Special Services" procedures as set forth in Chapter 3 .03 of the Municipal Code and permit the procurement of these "services under the method indicated for "General Services" . Upon receipt- of the proposals from interested engineering firms, the staff will recommend an award to the Council . Recommendation That the City Council waive formal requests for proposal procedures as provided in Section 3 . 03 .070 (b) and instruct the Department of Public Works to obtain proposals in accordance with Section 3 .03 . 060 of the Municipal Code. Ver �iyv o rs, IV _LX ,Xt A'.. E. H H Director of��c Works EH:WEH: 1�„� mc llolEl ------------- .01 _r-F- 4T�AMT� oc, ------- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA I -E ra � City of Huntington Beach ;.}. �`! • ... P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 23, 1977 I Ms. Adrianna Gianturco Department of Transportation State of California P.' O. Box 1499 Sacramento, CA 95807 Dear Ms. Gianturco: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, May 16, 1977, adopted Resolution 4466 urging high priority on the improvement of Pacific Coast Highway between Highway 39 and the Santa Ana River. Enclosed is a copy for. your records. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:scb Enclosure 9 f' COry OF HUNMGUOR ROACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES 0 P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 1-00 7 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council j FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 10, 1977 ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator RE: IMPROVEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN BEACH BOULEVARD AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER Transmitted herewith is a resolution of the City Council urging that a high priority be placed by the Department of Transportation on the widening and improving of Pacific Coast Highway between Beach Boulevard and the Santa Ana River. This resolution has been requested by the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce as a part of their efforts to eliminate traffic hazards that exist on this stretch of the highway. These efforts have included contact with the Governor' s office, State Senators, and the Orange County Board of Supervisors (see attached) . The Council by adoption of the resolution will also be urging the State Department of Transportation to reevaluate its highway funding priorities so as to allow prompt construction of the necessary improvements . Recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, aj�- W- Edward D. Selich Director EDS:JMC: ja HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER of COMMERCE �� • 18582 BEACH BOULEVARD,SUITE 224 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 TELEPHONE(714)962-6661 HUNTINGTON BEACH April 26, 1977 OFFICERS !'ietident WILLIAM S. PETF:RSON t Honorable Edmund G. Brown Governor Hank of America State of California Grit i'ire Pretidcru State Capitol Building' JACK FEEHAN Southern Calif.Gas Co. Sacramento CA 95814 Second L'iie President JF.RRY SHEA Huntington Beach Co. Treasurer WILLIAM COMPTON Dear Governor Brown: Southern Calif. Edison Co. lixer'utive Alanager RALPH KISER Renewing our appeal for emergency action, widening DIRECTORS: of Pacific Coast Highway from Beach Boulevard (Highway #39) JEROME M. BAME to Santa Ana River Bridgei to increase the opposing traffic Attorney at Law separation from six (6") inches to fifteen (151 feet -- please ANITA BEI SITO Women's Division President hear our-plea. AIL.EEN,CHAMBERS Crocker National Bank With the State's report of $309 Million surplus in WAL7'C1.F.VF.LAN[) the highway fund, it has been said that "blood alleys" such McDonnell Douglas JIM DE GUFLLE as this should be corrected. Additional deaths and injuries De Guelle&Sons Glass Co. are going to be suffered this summer unless something is done JIM FOXX immediately. Foxx Development Co. DAVF:C;AROFAL Union Carbidee The State owns the property on both sides of the High- RICHARD GRUNDY way, A 15' temporary expansion would allow the center strip Huntington Iixercommumty Hospital addition.. ORVILLE HANSON Aminntl, U.S.A., Inc, JACK R. HIGLFY Please lend the strength of your office on Caltrans Unned Cahfurna Bank to get this emergency action underway. S EVE HOLDEN South Shores'Institance Most sincerely, Al.KLINGIiNSMI'1'H AnoincY it Law .JIM LARKIN Red Carpet (teal.L.state LIiONARU i.lNDBORC' llpp�, Ki er Lions f.nntuxl, Ini ISA SMASHFY R(X.;ERS E ecuti'e Manager Coast Developolent Co. IOYCE ROLI.INGS Western Mutual Fsiruw ROGER D. SLATES RK�hg Sc•acliff Realty n/ ROBF.RT TERRY Terry Buick RICHARD TOM Tom 8 Truskier Architects,AIA DON WALTER Pacific City Bank DARRELL F. WARD Pacific View Memorial Park STANLEY A, YOUNG Huntington Beach Co. 77-16 ISSUE: HIGHWAY FUNDS f , f Ste: A new set of forces is at work in the transportation planning and financing decision-making process. The Governor now has a Highway Commission composed of his own appointees, and an administrative agency (CalTrans), both reflecting an anti- highway point of. view. r • Slightly over a year ago, predictions from nearly all quatters were .that beckusis of inflation in highway construction costs r and an antici*sted decline in the sale of motor fuels, the high- way fund was Yti for very trying times. Now, however, the state reports a "surplus" in excess of $309 million igithe Highway Fund. This reversal is the result .of an anti-highway philoso- phy on the 'part of the Governor as set forth-by CalTrans and its Director.' Major tram'ortationAigislation (AB 402) •hes been introduced by Assemblyman Walter Ingalls, Chairman of the Assembly Trans- portation' Committee. ' Central to the bill is the concept of "legislative program budgeting" of highway funds and conaolida-, s tion of the functions an d -responsibilities of the Highway Com- mission, Aeronautics Board, Toll Bridge Authority, and State Transportation Board into a new California Transportation Commission; k' I• Chamber The California Chamber of Commerce favors a system of trans- Position: portition in California utilizing, various uiodes appropriate in meeting the real needs of citizens. We believe that in finan- cing the several modes (1) funds to construct and operate mass public transit must be derived from sources other than highway user taxes and fees; (2) further diversion of highway user funds for other purposes should not be, permitted; and (3) any Attempts to return to legislative budgeting of highway funds be opposed. The Chamber is, however, in the process of reevaluating all of its policies on this subject in light of changing conditions. Reasons For 1. The California Highway Commission was created by the Legis- Position: lature to establish priorities for highway, construction and to administer the spending .of highway funds. One of the reasons was to remove "pork barrel" decision making from the Legislature itself. It certainly did not intend that the Executive Branch should somehow usurp that ' function. 2. There are numerous "blood alleys"• in the state on which people continue to be injured and die while the money to tl correct these highway facilities is currently available. 3. New jobs as spinoff from highway construction could be created if. surplus funds were used. b t OVER Mao Agri! 26, a i 71 . Thomas- F. A ley, Qktair a,n Grande County.Board of Supervisors Santa Ana CA 92704 Dear Sunerviser Rilleyt Thanks tot your ratter of April <<0, and 'we haisten. to toting ure you thaf we do appreciate your good informs- tib-11.�1.11d efforts with,regards to Pacific' Crust Highway mri.dr'ninq t,�,ast of Beach t i6ulevarJ �Attrioh ti i;o ,o 64:,o of. April 20 on 'this mibjedt:. Also a Wpy of recent tc1'Ct' � ltl t.�',pr of dot71metco W 10--tii-I. Otr Mm it to t 4ovt Bono if only temp- a�' ry; to yii4i6ie dehgerg. this surhm- er. Our B+oard of Directors are very utidoi fortabie 14'b'Dut thl;i sittiatioti G' raj, Reip Kis ?i�'hg Incl. cc: VIm: Petar an Roger 014it 's akl:.APt.TO ADDRUSS CHAIRMAN ' 4TATQrCAPIT0L 88814 SENATE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS TALI♦HOM Its Wll) 445•56ft CHAIRMAN DISTRICT A00AC" ,JOINT LEOINLATIYE ITBSS fKT.A.K C..C,2--SUITS IOB DENNIS E. CARPENTER OUOOET COMM IT rEc. 114)°CA tirTl+ 17 ORAGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES t1) SfT•ff00 IN COMMITTEES FINANCE NOUSTRIAL' CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE INSURANCE Arlo FIN ICIAL .' • .� `� INSTITUTIONS -••'�1i,� 1 JUDICIARY CALIFORNIA INFORMATION SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION roARDa WILDLI FI CONSINVATION BOARD Apri 1 200 1971 Mr. R. J. Datel District Director Department of' Transportation 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Mr. Datel, Ms. Gianturco has advised me that your office will be investigating the .request on the need for an extension of the median on Pacific Coast Highway from Beach Soule- vard easterly to the Santa Ana River. The Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce has done a great deal of work in bringing attention to this urgent need and has compiled in as to the increases in personal injuries, }'property damage and fatalities in the . specific area necessitating immediate action prior to the 1977 summer traffic. Since Ms . Gianturco has stated her first priorities to proj.ect� to maintain and operate .the, existing highway syst.t,m at the highest levels 'of safety, I am assuming the Department will be able to do what is necessary in making immediate and urgent arrangerneilts .for, this proj.ect;. if you need any additional information, please'. let me know. Thank you for your continued assistance in these matters. DENNIS E. CARPENTER ' Senator, 36th District DEC:Cb cc : Huntington Beach Chamber ?( ..I ,Y ,_ e C y it o f Huntington Beach * P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT `►�' February 25, 1977 t Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Condemnation of Property for Mansion Ave. Public Street Improvements; CC-251 Dear Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a resolution to condemn, with imme- diate possession, a parcel of land located adjacent to Mansion t Ave. at the southeast corner of the intersection of Huntington St. and Yorktown Ave. This land is required to permit construc- tion for public improvement and widening of Mansion Ave. This office has been in contact with Ms . L. Gifford, the property owner, and correspondence received from Ms. Gifford' s attorney indicates that no settlement for purchase of the land can be reached through further negotiations. This office anticipates commencement of the proposed construc- tion in June, 1977 . It is, therefore, requested that the attached resolution be accepted and condemnation proceedings be started. Very truly yours, 'H. E. Hart e g Director of Public Works HEH:CBD: jy Trans. 0 STATE:,_-..1JT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY CG__..:IL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Monday, April 4, 1977 Mayor Wieder called the regular meetiny of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M. Present: Bartlett, Coen, Pattinson, Shenkman, Siebert, Wieder Absent: Gibbs RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED Following removal from the consent calendar of Resolutions 4442 and 4443, on motion by Siebert, second Pattinson, Council directed the Clerk to read Resolution Nos. 4439, 4440, 4441, 4444, 4445, 4446, 4447 and 4448 by title, waived further reading, and adopted same by the following roll call vote : AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: None ABSENT: Gibbs RESOLUTION NO. .4447 - ADOPTED - PORTION OF HAMILTON AVENUE AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO BE. A COUNTY HIGHWAY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO SAME "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DECLARING HAMILTON AVENUE BETWLEN BROOKHURST STREET AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO BE A COUNTY HIGHWAY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO SAME." r On, motion bYBartlett,second Pattinson, the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11.:45 P.M. to Monday; April. 18, 1977 at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber, Civic Center �?� � Xgx �xYSvXie� X Motion carried unanimously AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: of Huntington Beach, California By Connie A. Brockway, _ Deputy _ Alicia M. Wentworth Harriett M. . Wieder City Clerk Mayor Connie A. Brockway ,Deputy STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) SS: City of Huntington Beach) ®� City of Huntington Beach ���' • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January 31, 1977 i �ppYZ®' 7 Honorable Mayorand City Council-.� -----� City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator i Subject: Professional Services Contract for Talbert Avenue Street Improvements Dear Council Members : The Department of Public Works has prepared a request for proposal for professional engineering services to prepare plans , specifications and cost estimate for Talbert Avenue between Gothard Street and Newland Street. Due to the recent termination of two employees and the extended illness of one other individual in the Design section of Public Works, we are unable to complete this project during this fiscal year. This is an approved AHFP project, therefore, one-half of the engineering costs are eligible for reimbursement from Orange County. Upon receipt of the proposals from interested engineering firms, they will be analyzed by the staff and recommendations as to contract award presented to the Council. The cost of this engineering services contract is expected to be about $39, 000. 00 and will be funded by Gas Tax. It is recommended that the City Council instruct the Department of Public Works to obtain proposals in accordance with Chapter 3. 03 of the City Code. Very truly yours , 01 H. E. Hartge Director of ublic Works HEH:WEH:ae � , A-A City of Huntington BeachPe-t�-�Ih 1-7_7 (r.�1 P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT March 29, 1977 ^� Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Newland Street Improvements at Park Site Dear Council Members: La Cuesta has commenced installation of street improvements on Newland Street on Tract 7771, northwest of Ellis and Newland. They have offered to perform this same type of work along the 320 feet of the City park, which is adjacent to the tract, at their tract unit prices. This would save the City approximately $4 , 000, the difference between what a public contract is estimated to cost ($15, 800) and the approximate cost ($11,800) of the work if it ,6 were to be performed by La Cuesta. The estimate for the City con- tract is based on the most recent contract for similar type of work, and the cost figure provided by La Cuesta is for an actual contract agreement. If the work along Newland Street is not accomplished at the time of the adjacent street widening, a traffic and drainage hazard will be created. Transmitted herewith is a resolution declaring the work to be of urgent necessity. It is recommended that the City Council pass the resolution and authorize the expenditure from Gas Tax funds. Very truly yours , G—� H�. Haft e g Director of Pu lic Works HEH:ae Trans. �{'-- iO3 sr 4-V-y ' City of Huntington Bea"e a, Z1, P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (of-7 7 March 29, 1977 l 1� 4/, ?�W t� Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Resolution to Permit OCEMA Construction on Hamilton Avenue Dear Council Members : The Orange County Environmental Management Agency is prepared to award a contract for the construction of a new bridge on Hamilton Avenue over the Santa Ana River. As part of this project, the County will be required to improve the south side of Hamilton Avenue between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River. In order for the County to accomplish this, the City must declare Hamilton Avenue to be a County highway during the construction time period. The attached resolution is for this purpose. It is , therefore, recommended that the City Council approve this resolution and instruct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. Very truly yours, j E. artge Director of Public Works HEH:WEH:ae Attach. PLANNING ZONING DM 19 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 0 17-6-10 - -- �'Cl �1jEE N07E ' rl,�/ ®�i1 ADOPTED AUGUST 15,1060 'r.'uC^.G� �r"��� 1+•t u•+14 1 AL CITY COUNCIL ONDINANCE 40. 766' LEGEND' AMENDED OAD.NO. AMENDED OAD.NO' 14UNrI,1N(-TON BEACH. =-16.62 .,D 0.4.64 1050 LTE7 4Csrr•+Mt .:+nA*w.. os�.K+ 0.20-65 L156 11L7 ca+w.+r wo•ns wn4K+ 6-10.6} 1245 Ertl o•olt r.r l+ •rvtt.cr onnKF 7.6.07 301 E.-J 1Oi�•r c0.w+cut onr-Alcr 1 i �' •-IT 67 I510 (a7_J tm+t6,wt+lrt[r•rty N[FIO[.4r dtTM c+ (� KANGE, (:(.) UNT , CA1,1FO11NIA 5-1-67 1716 1. - AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 5 67 1545 5 20 e6 1411 221,416.522.68 25,66-70,67-2.67-9,61-19.605,60-22 ••N•N 1446 SUFFIX LEGEND .0 A T L ANTA AYE JO.NN 5T 12 ICT R l �. r RA-0 ' ---R I7 r? C C� WILSON 11 n•RI ' o � CAHIT L l,' a 1 RA-0 • W u CONGHf SS ST ( � aVVEHNOH sT C 4 In o _ _L:i_- cii I r-1-TO _ T_ HAMILTON ST � - iui�'f j ♦CI r'- OA 5T iI I- TIP "' IINDI N tE i R ' / w, , H ' a 1 O Cj A 0 Y o f '.HovE °L b " /yam / 0 J{.. G T CI v Ot HE—0.BC ACTI (r, Sr 6( R = 0 "� o4i l+f Ppuf LN r'L Q' Z 0 DI 11— 5, i 1 r / 1 r rt —_ . 7 / I uiI Ire .I I r � +H v+ ti II•�H ��— �-1 f— , •' n 1 2 3 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF. 4 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5 March 15,' 1977 6 On motion of Supe=visor Schmit, duly seconded and carried, the 7 following Resolution was adopted: 8 WHEREAS, that portion of Hamilton Avenue .between Brookhurst Street 9 and the Santa Ana River .lying within the City Limits of Huntington Beach, 10 and that portion of Victoria Street across the Santa Ana River lying 11 within- the City Limits of Costa Mesa are deemed to be highways of county- 12 wide importance; and 13 WHEREAS, the County of Orange proposeb to improve said portions of 14 Hamilton Avenue and Victoria Street; J ' oZ; 15 , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to the V O �� W 16 provisions of Section 1700, Article 3, Chapter 9, Division 2 of the 4 h O O Z �a 17 Streets and Highways Code, all of that portion of Hamilton 'Avenue between 18 Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River lying within the City Limits 19 of Huntington Beach, and all of that portion of Victoria Street across 20 the Santa Ana River lying within the City Limits of Costa Mesa are hereby 21 declared to be County Highways during the period of improvement of said 22 roads by the County of Orange. 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board be and is hereb 24 authorized and directed to transmit to the City_Councils of the Cities of 25 Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa, certified copies of this Resolution and 26 request concurring City resolutions. 27 0 P N eL 28 W / Resolution No. 77-394 1. ® Declare Hamilton Avenue and Victoria Street to be County OMMsdk Highways during Construction - -... ..--_._��.__----___..w,.......V.,__...__�.�.... . ., __.,•ter-.a.,a.,. -.,-�..�,.p,. . , .... _. .�. . .w .,r :.,_� 1 AYES: SUPERVISORS LAURENCE J. SCHMIT, PHILIP L. ANTHONY, RALPH A. DIEDRICH, .RALPH B. CLARK, AND THOMAS F. RILEY 2 NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE 3 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 5 ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 6 ,E. I, JUNE ALEXANDER, CLERK of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County., California,, 7 hereby certify that the above and foregoing, Aesolution was duly and regularly adopted by 8 the said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the isth day of March 9 19 77, and passed by a gnanim us vote of said Board. 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my. hand and seal.•thix SAst'h day 12 of March 19 •'.�. �,,�� 13 Via % JUN&iALEXANDER, 14 Clerk af:xbe Board of Supervisors ). of Orangd_County, Cal i1orrr1OZ �i; UV o0 17 u 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 C e 27 0 28 U. 2. • City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92640 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 6, 1977 Orange County Board of Supervisors Attention: Carl Nelson Environmental Management Agency 630 N. Broadway Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Monday, April 4, 1977, adopted Resolu- tion No. 4447 declaring Hamilton Avenue between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River to be a county highway during construction of improvements to same. Enclosed is a certified copy for your records. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:scb Enclosure RESOLUTION NO. 4447 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DECLARING HAMILTON AVENUE BETWEEN BROOKHURST STREET AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER TO BE A COUNTY HIGHWAY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO SAME WHEREAS, that portion of Hamilton Avenue between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River lying within the city limits of Huntington Beach is deemed to be a highway of countywide importance ; and The County of Orange proposes to improve said portion of Hamilton Avenue, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that pursuant to the provisions of Section 1700, Article 3 , Chapter 9, Division 2 of the Streets and Highways Code, all of that portion of Hamilton Avenue between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River lying within the city limits of Huntington Beach is hereby declared to be a county highway during the period of improvement of said road by the County of Orange. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Orange County Board of Supervisors . PASSED' AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th ` day of April, 1977 . ATTEST: Mayor A l i c i a M WentWQr th City Clerk By ., 4L ff - :a40t2 Deputy City Clerk 1 . /cs 1 REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City dministrator �, C' y Attor e �< INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: NO FISCAL IM�� ''- FISCAL {F;-f;" FISCAL th REQUIRES t=►f��.,.. _,. ... , :f , .� kE°ORT...� 2. k, No. 4447 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of April 19 77 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Coen, Pattinson, Shenkman, Siebert, Wieder NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California By / Deputy City Clerk 3 ►� 1 2 3 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 4 ORAWE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA S March 15,' 1977 6 On motion of Supervisor Schmit, duly seconded and carried, the 7 following Resolution was adopted: 8 WHEREAS, that portion of Hamilton Avenue between Brookhurst Street 9 and the Santa Ana River .lying within the City Limits of Huntington Beach, 10 and that portion of Victoria Street across the Santa Ana River lying 11 within- the City Limits of Costa Mesa are deemed to be highways of county- 12 wide importance; and 13 WHEREAS, the County of Orange proposes to improve said portions of 14 Hamilton Avenue and Victoria Street; 3. W . . '�0 15 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that pursuant to the u 0 U 16 provisions of Section 17000 Article 3, Chapter 9, Division 2 of the .0 Z 60 17 IStreets and Highways Code, all of that portion of Hamilton Avenue between 18 Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River lying within the City Limits 19 of Huntington Beach, and all of that portion of Victoria Street across 20 the Santa Ana River lying within the City Limits of Costa Mesa are hereby 21 declared to be County Highways during the period of improvement of said 22 roads by the County of Orange. 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board be and is hereb 24 authorized and directed to transmit to the City .Councils of the Cities of 25 lHuntington Beach and Costa Mesa, certified copies of this Resolution and c 26 request concurring City resolutions. 27 0 N 28 U. Resolution No. 77-394 1. Declare Hamilton Avenue and Victoria Street to be County OMM:dk Highways during Construction 1 AYES: SUPERVISORS LAUPMM J. SCHMIT, PHILIP L. ANTHONY, RALPH A. DI=RICH, .R}1LPH B. CLARK# AND THOMAS F. RILEY 2 NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE 3 41 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA S Ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 6 I, JUNE ALEXANOER, CLERK of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, Californian 7 hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by 8 the said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the isth day of March 9 19 77, and passed by a unanimous vote of said Board 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal.-this , day of _ March . 14..1Z_,. • ��a 12 wr 13 ca 14 Clerk (if I%e hoard of Supervisors W of Orange,County, Ca l i forfriA VU 4 _ t6 1 '.. C= t •ter. ....• 00 17 V l 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 '0 26 27 8 0 28 0 2. ®, City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT October 21, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Proposed Street Improvements Northwest Corner Bolsa Chica and Pearce Dear Council Members: The area west of Bolsa Chica Street between Warner and Heil Avenues has developed rapidly in the past few years and has resulted in a sharp increase in traffic. The land northwest of Bolsa Chica and Pearce was previously subdivided and the builders have built on existing lots. Due , to necessary additional right of way for Bolsa Chica Street, the four lots at the northwest corner are not buildable and we, therefore, are unable to obtain the right of way as a condition of a building permit. These four lots are unbuildable since the required dedication for street rights of way would leave a strip of land 20 ' wide by 93 ' long. This situation is shown on the attached map. In its present state the properties present a traffic hazard and drainage nuisance. In order to resolve this traffic problem, the City can either negotiate the purchase of these lots or file for condemnation. For this purpose an appraisal report on this land has been prepared by Cedric A. White, Jr. The fair market value according to the report is $20 ,000. 00. The property owner will not accept less than $20,000 for the four lots consisting of 4 ,900 square feet. It is recommended the City Council accept the terms of the sale and authorize the staff to complete the transaction. All the costs incurred by the acquistion can be paid from the City Gas Tax. Very truly yours, �� H. E. HartgeOF Director of Public Works HEH:ae Attach. 178 - � � 3 i„=50, -a a m m C/V/c STREET -o I _196 49` s 20 1 0 I - 95- - - - -� 98- - - - - 119 - - - -- 122- - - - - i 6 W o Q 194 - 99 118 123 142 -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I M 193 /00 117 124 141 1148 30, I 30` I J I .3' 9 /O 49' 1116 1125140 Il49 I I I _ 9/ 126 _ 139 1/50 - -- - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - -- - - - - N I I � ✓ 24 I / ° 90 I/03 1114 J127 /3815L _ _ _ _\ N I 14 I ' N I I 89 _ _ _ _ _ �/04 _ _ _ _ _ +//3 - - - - -I-- - _ _ _ _ 137 I/52 I I I I � 1 23 � -o 88 1 105 i/l2 _ _ 1129 136 153 `^ I I I I I 87 1106 19� I/// 1130 /35 9s"I /54 L Z94' 1 (1) I I I I I Q 86_ _ _ _ _ J107 - - - - _ _ _ _ I/3/ L134 /55 o I t - - - - f -- - - - - -I I o 15LA NO. i 187 85 108 1109 1132 z9 133 156 zs' I 30' NOTE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 81 ASSESSOR'S MAP PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 22 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE PLAtvNING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 20 -5 - II -1 ° CITY OF LEGEND HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP j� EDINGER AVE I I \�\ Dc 3 C) PRELUDE OR CF-E CF-E VE:. ql= KONA a SUITE DR o �9 TEMOR DR O,VO v / (� p r MINUET DR m HILO CR Wqt \ .�'� CF RF I\ p o KAUI DR y E .y � lry RHAPSODY DR MAUI CR. oe i z _ ?h _ CF R a OPERETTA DR OAHU OR CF-R zO _ - _ _ _ DR w 3 Y 0 3 x a x �p/� z',------ ----- SCENARIO DR. C6-1 O C F C D �s -- - --DR 4 FISHER — CF-R HEIL AVE pQ� CHRISTIANA BAY 5� CF-R CF-E DR CF-R STAR 2 DR RRAIRIE `n DR �— PICKWICK CR. CF-R w BRANFORD DP z T1 U\,pUN SPA' + CF-R a N — Fl nRo Rg0 OµRm 'I --Pa PEARCE ST DALE DR CF-R _ S MPN Da. — — BOARDWALK DR — K 1901A v Ut 1L_ U CF-R W FMILO ST MILO ST = C F- _ DAVENPORT \ J Jz Q � O O ✓1 e U c O CFR s o t o r 3 0 4 o p DR 2 DO W J U I w � U Lr o WARNER AVE r J 0 V 1 RESOLUTION NO. 4121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECTIFYING AN ERROR IN RESOLUTION NO. 4116 IN THE DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY NEEDED FOR THE WIDENING OF GOTHARD STREET WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach through Resolution No. 4116 authorized acquisition of certain properties for the widening of Gothard Street , and Said Resolution No. 4116 in Exhibit 2 , paragraph 2, line 2 thereof, erroneously referred to the "north 1175. 00 feet" instead of the "south 1175 . 00 feet ," NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby incorporate Resolution No. 4116 and amend Exhibit 2 thereof to read as follows : EXHIBIT NO. 2 r' That portion of Section 26 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West , in the Rancho La Bolsa Chica and the Rancho Las Bolsas , City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 13 of Miscellanous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county , described 'as follows : The east 15 . 00 feet of the west 40 . 00 feet of the north 100 . 00 feet of the south 1175 . 00 feet of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 26. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August , 1975 ...ATTEST'- ity Clerk X FROVtD AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED TO FORM: JOC : cs City Administrator City A torney r Res. No. 4121 r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August 19 75 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Barlett. Wieder, Coen, Matney, Gibbs NOES: Councilmen: Nnnn ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley, Duke City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City ,Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California. • /a J� City of Huntington Beach 0 P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT f! July 20, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Brookhurst Street Improvements Dear Council Members: On March 1, 1976, the City Council approved participation with Orange County Sanitation District for the construction of street and storm drain improvements on the east side of Brook- ! hurst Street between Hamilton Avenue and the Orange County Flood Control District D02 channel. The estimated cost for the City' s portion of this work was $53 ,000. 00. This project was completed in July 1976, and the following is a summary of City actual costs: Orange County Sanitation District Invoice No. 602024 $51,086. 11 Southern California Edison P.O. #10733 (street lighting) 7 ,015. 00 Total $58,101. 11 All the expenditures for this project can be paid out of the City Gas Tax fund. It is recommended that the City Council accept the street improvements and authorize the expenditure of $51,086. 11 to the Orange County Sanitation District. Very truly yours , O' E: ar e Director of Public Works HEH:WEH:ae STATEML&, OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNC.Ln.' Council Chambar, City Hall Huntington Beach, Cali!fornia Monday, August 2, 1976 Mayor Pro Tempore Pattinson called the regular —meeting of the City Council -7 — ie. City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. tlre.,iont. Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Shenkman, (Siebert 7:15 P.M.) Absofit : Wieder CONSENT CALENDAR ;- (ITEMS APPROVED) On motion by Bartlett, second Gibbs, the following items were approved as recommended by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT: Wieder BROOKHURST -STREET IMPROVEMENTS Accepted street improvements on the east side of Brookhurst Street between Hamilton Avenue and the Orange County Flood Control District D02 Channel and authorize4 expenditure of $51,086.11 to the Orange County Sanitation District. On motion by Bartlett. spacgnd Gibbs the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 12'.25 A.E-1 to Monday, August 9, 1976, —at 6:30 P.M. in the Room B-8, Civic Center Tho motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman NOES: None ABSENT:- Wieder Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: of Huntington Beach, California Alicia M. Wentworth Ronald R. 'Pattinson City Clerk Mayor Pro Tempore STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange SS: City of Huntington Beach) 1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the City ,of 11twitington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregcing is a irue and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of. said City at their regLilar meeting held on the 2nd day of August 1976 wi,rN!-,'SS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this s the 3rd day of August 1976 City Clerk and ex-officio-Cierk of the City Council of the City of HuntingtonBeach, California BY -4X&,A642 pouty z-) 3 City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT V April 9, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Adams Median Dear Council Members: A condition of approval of Use Permit No. 75-61 for the development of the property at the southeast corner of Brook- hurst and" Adams is that the developer must pay 11% of the cost of a median in Adams Avenue along their frontage, or must bond for same. If the City Council wishes to install the median at this time there are two alternatives: 1. Median complete with landscaping at a total cost of about $15,700. 00. City' s share would be $14 ,000. 00. 2 . Median without landscaping but with irrigation system for later landscaping at a total cost of about $10 ,200. 00. City' s share would be $9 ,100. 00 . If it is your decision to proceed with the project, I recommend alternate No. 1 and if so you should instruct the Department of Public Works to prepare the plans. The work is eligible to be paid with Gas Tax funds. Very truly yours , e H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:ae \ � a_5 J� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT March 31, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach ', i Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Street Widening in Exchange for Right of Way Dear Council Members: There are occasions where it is an advantage to the City to offer to install street improvements on an arterial highway if the adjacent owner will dedicate land for street right of way. A typical situation is on the south side of Warner Avenue east of Bolsa Chica Street. There are seven (7) lots with frontages ranging from 50 feet to 222 feet which project into the roadway. This area is master planned as commercial. We have finally obtained commitment from all of the owners to dedicate in exchange for street improvements. In addition, one of the owners agreed to dedicate right of way across a 120 . 00 foot frontage on the west side of Bolsa Chica north of Heil Avenue in exchange for improvements. This construction will not only remove obstacles from the roadway, but will eliminate a drainage problem. Formal agreement is not necessary; however , it is recommended the City Council approve this exchange in concept. If we do not accept the offer and must later condemn for the right of way, the City would then have to pay for both the right of way and the improve- ments. The approximate cost is $25 ,000. 00 and will be paid out of Gas Tax funds. I can continue to bring these matters of dedication in exchange for improvements to the City Council or you may wish to allow staff to evaluate and make the decisions. Very truly yours , H. E. Hartge Director of ;ublic Works HEH:ae PLANNING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 28-5-11 CITY OF LEGEND --_—:bErv°�Es rRi)OAF° hf EWn, HUN` INGT'ON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP zD�zl 1 r ze sY 4 J\ 1 WARNER i AVE I CIJET-LL.LI'L_a_) (1.L1=_1Il:TZ% 9 TAa' _ EL DOR0.00_ DR "` •R4yER�4 ¢�. R — __-_ _ _ _ :5 — L_.-......r— u u PENDLE _ D -- w Q —_W_ ._ - aRWObI __ J--- `` BRANNEN „DR U 6 _ GLENROY r_ R .1._.J�.L��� LIE°; D J (WORTH OR GHENT DR. _ -- DR I `f° C F-E _ - .__ z }I/ � .. it.1`};il:i`iiI''N'..I li•,.;i 1 '_. — _ ._ __ _" O W YI ROT'MMA SLATER AVE. PRICE a DR, PUTNEY CR DR 1 H 3 DR _ I Er ..DES —_DR \\ S �• NfEN�IOE OR CF RAPHAEL DR. , — CR 4 \ 4 INON, DR. aq `�P as CF-R- -- DR _ TERRIERHd pR. J' ;. <DUA DR. _ rto � 3�4mEECED w3-- af" - /off Huntington Beach Design Review Board P.O. BOX 190 CALIF 0- '648 op TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL cjly FROM: Design Review Board 00 g DATE : July 11 , 1973 cIL RE : Median Landscaping - Non-landscaped Treatments �Iv Over the past six months , the Design Review Board has had the opportunity to see proposed landscaping plans for median strips on Beach Boulevard, Main Street , and Brookhurst Street . The Board has approved these proposals . During the review process , however, concern has developed over the continued use of "reliable rock" for the non-landscaped portions of the medians . This is used primarily in the narrow portions of the medians at turn pockets. This material is inexpensive ; however, in the opinion of the Board, the aesthetic qualities of this treatment leave much to be desired. While satisfactory alternatives are few, the Board has investigated the use of stamped concrete in place of the reliable rock . This material is more expensive to install ; however, it expresses a level of visual quality that, in the opinion of the Board, is representative of the aesthetic goals of Huntington Beach. The upgrading of this treatment would necessitate a policy change and a financial commitment to achieve this higher level of quality. Attached are comparative cost estimates prepared by the Public Works Department . The Board would be pleased to present a slide presentation of these median treatments for your consideration. The Board recommends that your Honorable Body consider upgrading treatment of non- landscaped portions of street medians . Respectfully submitted, VSectary Kellogg DESIGN BROOKHURST I Red Cobble Stone (no grouting) $1. 55 per sq. ft. Note: Grouting 50� per sq. ft. extra Total sq. ft. of area - 21,624 sq. ft . 1. Stamp Concrete total area "No Grouting" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $33, 517. 20 . "With Grouting" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $44 ,329 . 20 2 . Stamp Concrete 50% area = $16 , 758 .60 f = $223,164 .60 Reliable Rock 50% area = 5 , 406 . 00 3 . Stamp Concrete 50% area = $16 , 758. 60 $20 ,542 . 80 Reliable Rock 50% area = 3 , 784. 20 (no a. c. ) c . 4. Reliable Rock Total area (over a. c. )= $10 , 812 . 00 f 5 . Reliable Rock Total area (no a.c. ) $ 7, 568 .40 DESIGN REVIEW NO , 73-7 BROOKHURST MEDIAN LANDSCAPING NON-LANDSCAPED AREA COSTS t, HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 6/8/73 I a Q/ ,j BOLSA 4500 hip FADDEN Lll-Aj _ o E_DINGER 2000 725C 6500 11000 I,000 19500 20600 27000 1f5C0� o r18 o c c v o ; 0� o 0 r ;iw o 0 230o HEIL Lv_•7 4970 6�G; oGCO o Lo-olLn�o z44C0� r o IJ[I- O[:--i i;�L—_� N O cv I'�(�`Qw'jlI' O J L__�J 1 I� O 11 14600 MOO 153CO 21400 19600 19100 16500 1900D 203 �. 152G0 0 8C� U 8L F----�, Jo `= 0 m O SLATER 5150ci m wllo 0 J ` w m —; ��lN FM'—, O ql o, L r_ TALBERT' 0 2070_ o _J — � 4100 o z J Q ll o w a� f �CbO ELLIS 2�n 4QU J E70 8300 �o 1 d � O I / GARFI=LD== L 4450 ('- 3300 4100 N 6600 6350 6900 N 1`15oo O Q�O YORKt[O]1IL �N 2950 '"OO 2650 2t'>50 1300 CO 'Ao�i [—Jl _ L'IS _ N �1 i�-��L 3-00_ 11600 13250 15900 �,�a ����'✓�, v�� c; x�o o 0 0 0 V / IN V N O / O �950 -_q2�p 3400 2000 8 INDIANAPOLIS t_oo0?CXYJp---- / 7 l0 J1 0 Q� 50Cti00p ^0_GO 000`'-- �2�n 2iG L-`T,�1' h OIL 14500 L,�q-Q-QAE-6r�2 �1 5500 J 4200 0 0ATLANTA - O N ?2 O N NU3?2,=R OF VEHICLES PER 24 HOUR PERIOD 11 0 0 � b - OCT03ER 1972 1 8 1950 6500_ 7500 0 9300 CITY OF u o MILTONal ' 0 'Ell c HUNTINGTON BEACH cH�4Y savNirrc `PM TRAFFIC FLO'll 200— �'o MAP ho 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 IM1,LE � 0 1320 2640 3960 5260 FEET I City Entrance Program ' ENTRY PRIORITY BY TOTAL TRAFFIC FLOW Design Review Board 6/73 o 01��� BOLSA 4500 NIC FADDEN r � _l c" EDINGER L 2000 �-72-')O 1 15110 11000 I?c.00 i9500 20800 27000 � HEIL I Dc�� 2300oII '0-- [4�:111 -F.,-,i LER E]CA 11[�C] F SLATER A14600 14100 1 DO 21400 19600 19;00 16500 19003 203 60 15-2 0—') < 0 J:g,�- 0 F F < V) 5150 co IIN TALBERI ,1c) j 4100 OFLl Ld 000 ELLIS 800 z R. 30 -J, 4450 I L 015 a 1) 2j0O va F-j L J,,7 . �"L F) I GARFIELD-- 6600 'R -635—o 6,350 1,1�no r 330D I F& Al 2151 0 1300 0 0 CO A I'MS L. 11bb Elf 0 11600 13250 15900 Ic � ,o• o��c\�,N0 C-1 0 2950] 0 4250 _.1400 2 0)CIO ._0 IVDIANAPO 25 MM oN m )-or)[500 to 45oc) D�ci 4200 ATLANTA O^ VERCLES PER 24 HOUR PERIOD 000 OCTOBER 1972 Z C 7500 0 9300 CITY OF 0 V,.. L�.kILTON HUNTINGTON BEACH ILANG— 41 TRAFFIC FLOW for2ir— MAP 0 1/4 112 3/4 1?,'LE 0 1320 2640 3960 5280 FEET O City Entrance Program ENTRY PRIORITY BY TOTAL TRAFFIC FLOW Design Review Board 6/73 City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT February 19 , 1976 A ppRo V ED B C r,.. Y COUNCIL Honorable Mayor _ jy and City Council ~` City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Brookhurst Street Improvements Dear Council Members: The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County propose to widen Brookhurst Street at Treatment Plant No. 2 , if the City will participate in the project. Their work would include street widening and curb and gutter at a cost of about $200 ,000. 00. The City' s share of the project would be storm drains and catch basins at a cost of about $23, 000. 00, street lights at $8 , 000 and a sidewalk at $22 , 000. 00. The City' s total share of about $53, 000 can be paid out of the Gas Tax funds. This commitment does not require a formal agreement by the City Council. It is recommended that the City Council, by minute action, approve participation in the County Sanitation District' s Brookhurst Street widening at Treatment Plant No. 2 . Very truly yours , ' 4H ! � H.. E �ge Director of Public Works HEH:ae ®� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT February 10 , 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Ellis Avenue Street Improvements Beach Blvd. to Gothard Street A.H.F.P. #688 , CC-250 Dear Council Members: In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City' s Environmental Review Board at its regular meeting of February 4, 1975, granted Negative Decla- ration No. 75-2 having found that the subject project will not have an adverse effect upon the physical environment. Prior to final Orange County Approvals , a Notice of Determination on N.D. 75-2 adopted by the City' s discre- tionary body must first be filed. It is therefore, requested that your Honorable Body adopt Negative Declaration 75-2 and issue the Notice of Determination. Very truly yours, . E. �ar� Director of Public Works HEH:WEH:mc �—f3erv{.ritiv2 751�3 �-� ity ' of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT February 10 , 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Waiver of Street Improvements Transmitted . herewith is an ordinance which will enable the Director. of Bldg and Community Development to issue a certificate of occupancy when, minor items of street improve- ment are incomplete. The owner will be required to deposit with the Finance Department, funds equal to 150% of the Public Works Director' s estimate of cost of incomplete improvements. An agreement .will be entered into such that the City may 6 use the money to complete the unfinished work after an agreed to period of time. This is intended to cover the situation when at the time the building is ready for occupancy, the street improvements are. incomplete due to non availability of material or because of bad weather. It is recommended the City Council adopt the ordinance. . Very truly yours, E. Hart Director of Public Works HEH;mc Trans. r 1 i ~� c" i r ORDINANCE NO. 2041 AN' ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS 9730. 4 . 1 AND 9730 . 4 . 2 THERETO PERTAINING TO WAIVER OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION .l . The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby amended. by adding thereto Sections 9730 . 4 .1 and 9730 . 4 . 2 to read as follows . 9730. 4 . 1 . WAIVER OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS . The Director of Building and . Community Development is authorized to waive the . ., requirements of Section 9730 . 4, and to issue a certificate of occupancy to any applicant therefor in the following circum- stances and upon the following conditions : (a) the certificate of occupancy would be issued excepting for completion of minor items of street improvement , and (b) the Director of Public Works has found that (1) the applicant has an urgent need to occupy the premises prior to completion of all items of work; ( 2 ) the interest of the City in having ail such minor improvements completed prior to the issuance of the occupancy permits is adequately safeguarded ; ( 3) the applicant has deposited with the Finance Department a sum of money equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the. Public Works . Director' s estimate of the cost of th& improve- ments the completion of which the waiver is sought ; and ( 4) the applicant has agreed with the City in writing that the deposit required by subsection ( 3) may be used by the City after an agreed upon time to complete the waived requirements if the applicant has not .completed such requirements within such time . The. remainder' of such deposit , if any , shall be returned to the applicant upon completion of the improvementsby the City . 9730• 4 . 2 . APPLICATIONS . The Director of Public Works is authorized to receive applications from persons desiring waivers WSA: cs 1. of the street improvement requirements of Section 9730 . 4 and to enter the required written agreements with such applicants . A non-refundable, fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) shall accompany each such application. ' SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this 'ord.inance and cause same to be published within fifteen., days after adoption in the Huntington Beach News , a weekly news- papers of .general circulation, printed and published. in Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ,ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held , on the 17th day of February, 1976 . Mayor ATTEST: City cler APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 City Administrator Sp( City..Attorn APPROVED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT: NO FISCAL IMPACT FISCAL IMPACT w- BUDGETED- FISCAL IMPACT - NOT BUDGETED REQUIRES FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT. ..::'. 2. 0, No. 2.041 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of .the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number. of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of February 19 76 and was again read to said City Council at a regular "meeting thereof held on the 1st day of March , 19 76 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said `City Council. AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Wieder, Coen, Duke, Gibbs NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Matney, Shipley Pity Clerk an ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California sy,"Z A City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT October 2 , 1975 A�VL� BY GI Honorable Mayor J and City Council `' ld' City of Huntington Beach � ' _ - Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Street and Lighting Conditions Florida Street, Agenda Item K-1 Dear Council Members: This is in response to Mr. Ralph Duran's request to you for a combination sidewalk and bike trail on Florida Street from Pacifica Hospital to Main Street. I recommend you authorize us to install by City forces a 4 foot wide asphalt walk on the west side of Florida. The cost of materials will amount to approximately $250. 00 and can be charged to a budgeted account. Further we should be authorized to have the Edison Company install three street lights on existing power poles. The installation will be at no cost to the City. Energy cost amounts to $4 . 69 per light per month and is covered in the budget. The Council also asked that we provide an update as to the status of street lights in the Motown area. This area bounded by Florida, Utica, Delaware and Yorktown has received an upgrading in lighting as follows: 1. Eleven 2500 lumen incandescent lights have been replaced by 3500 lumen mercury vapor lights. 2. Five new 7000 lumen lights have been installed on existing poles. The monthly cost has increased from $52 . 69 to $79 .19 . The lighting has been increased from 27,500 to 73,500 lumens. In other words, a 50. 3% increase in cost has resulted in 167 . 3% more lighting. Very truly yours , oe H. E. Hart %;11�� Director of Public Works HEH:ae Ralph_ Duran 22-07 Forida St. Project Esperonza. CAITO It o wn Honorable 11dayor City douncilpersons city of Hunt. Beh. , I and others have been taking notice of a 'probleri that may someday become a tragedy. This exists on Florida St. from Pacifica Hospital - to Main St. going North, no sidewalk. This involves Senior Citizens and. other citizens Patron- izing the Five Point7sb`hopi�in-, C�,enter.of P@.rticulsar Importance are Seniors. Sirce they tend. to -use the street, there by causing ,a t r7__ LI ffir-c—liazard, and. possibly Danger and. Physic,-:,lvHarm.This is Doubly so during the Rainy Season. -EC' 5EL11ES ex Pe"(ke I propose that the city take he,,a,d of this ande tom it in a speedy manner. Perhaps with a, combination of Bike Trail and. Sidewalk (temporary) out6lihIlls-phalt throvvn on top of the ground . 'V1ith the possibility that this might be Donated by a Paving Co. for a good cause. Again I im-plore on your good. Judgement to take-immidiate Action on this. Res'Dectfully Yours Ralph Duran Project Es'peronza (TVfotown , 3k --- - ------­--- ---_-----­ -3 4 ` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Bud Belsito - Administration To Bill Hartge - Public Works From Alicia M. Wentworth Dick Harlow - Planning City Clerk Subject Re: letter from Ralph Duran - Date September 9, 1975 street conditions We are attaching a letter from Mr. Ralph Duran regarding the problem of senior citizens walking on Florida Street from Pacifica Hospital to Main Street going north. He has requested that his communication appear under the "Written Communications" portion of the September 15, 1975 Council Agenda. If you have any material that you wish to appear in the Agenda packet, please submit it to this office by Wednesday, September 10, 1975. .l Sr DPW CITY OF HUnTInGTOn BEACH t 6en , /o J P.O. BOX 190, CALIFORNIA 92648 r 6,g49 C/� �®- PLANNING DEPT. (714) 536-5271~ 064 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Department DATE: January 28 , 1976 /Z/ -� 7 ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator RE: RESOLUTION 4189 IT Transmitted herewith is proposed Resolution No. 4189 which will delete vehicular access limitations to McFadden Avenue for those industrial properties subdivided by the recordation of Tract Maps 6948 , 8327 , and 8920. The Planning Commission and City Council at the time of approval imposed these arterial street access limitations in order that the City would control traffic entering and exiting on McFadden in the interest of the public health, welfare, and safety. In February 1975 , the Master Plan of Arterial Streets and High- ways was amended to delete McFadden Avenue as an arterial high- way and was redesignated as a local street. This type of access restriction is not deemed necessary on a local street and thus the dedication of access rights on these properties is no longer warranted. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends adoption of Resolution No. 4189 which will effectuate a vacation of the dedicated access rights on McFadden Avenue for Tract Maps No. 6948 , 8327 , and 8920 . - ' Respectfully submitted, f ' chard 4A. Harlow, Director Planning & Env. Resources RAH:JMC:gc Attachment: Resolution No. 4189 s i RESOLUTION NO 4189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REMOVING VEHICLE ACCESS RESTRICTION ON PROPERTY FRONTING ON MCFADDEN AVENUE IN' THE VICINITY OF GRAHAM AND BOLSA CHICA WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach required, as a con- dition of approval of Tract Map 6948 , 8327 and 8920, dedication to the City of Huntington Beach of access rights to McFadden Avenue in . order that the city could control traffic in the in- terest of the public health, welfare and safety; and In February 1975', the City of Huntington Beach ' s Master Plan of Arterial Highways was amended to delete McFadden Avenue . as an arterial highway and designate McFadden Avenue. as a -local ( street; and A restriction of vehicle access rights on a local street I is unnecessary , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City. Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it does hereby remove and delete the restriction imposed on vehicle access to McFadden Avenue by Tract Map 6948, 8327 , and 8920 . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of- February , 1976 . Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Alicia M Wen f-war+-h l By: 1 . Deputy j JOC :ahb G /19 LAW OFFICES OF (� STANLEY FELDSOTT ATTORNEYS =.CE►VE0 1617 WESTCLIFF DRIVE, SUITE 204 - BEVERLY HILLS OFFICE 'el �' STANLEY FELDSOTT C,ti NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA2GG0� 9100 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD,SUITE 204 O .. WILLIAM A.'1na+v dl�Ar.CIt%+'� .'�a11.fS��I+t IF. (714) 646-4466 BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90212 STUART M.PARKER / (213) 278-3567 1 9 July 23, 1975 ` °a75 ING 13 AM lU • _ City Planning Commission -'lz- :y "' ' of Huntington Beach City Hall Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 RE: Beachwalk Homeowners Association Gentlemen: Our firm represents the Beachwalk Homeowners Association. Beachwalk is a large planned residential development located in the City of Huntington Beach. The Homeowners Association owns all of the common area within the development, including the private roads into the development, and the Association has encountered many problems because of the general public coming into the development. These problems include, but are not limited to, illegal parking and speeding within the development. These problems pose a serious risk of harm to residents and guests. Accordingly, under the provisions of California Vehicle Code 21107.7, the Association hereby requests, that the �ty of Huntington Beach schedule a public hearing to consider whether the City should undertake to apply and enforce the regular city and traffic regulations within the development. Trusting to hear from you soon, I remain, Very truly yours,- LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY FELDSOTT 1= By: William A. McCormick WAM:av Affidavit bf A ' '�lication � � Statd of California , `� County of Orange } ss .� City pf Huntington Beach 1 Peorge Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a ublished Huntington. Beach News Apr. citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. 1971. That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach1,729, NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING News;"a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- NOTICE IS HERE@i GIVEN that a,pub- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said I lic h I ring ifthe will t of Huntington Beach � be held by the City County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination "Council council chamber of -the civic of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide !'Center, Huntington Beach,.at the hour subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been ;of 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as established, printed and published in the State of California, and ,•possible, on Monday the 17th day of County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication May, thin far the purpose of considering Section a petition for application 'of Section of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not 21107.7 of the State of California Vehicle devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any code to all 'streets within Villa Pacific particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or Tracts 5560, 5561 and 5559. any number thereof. All interested persons are invited to: attend said hearing and, express their The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper opinions for or against said petition. i of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court Further information. .may be obtained of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. from the Office of the city Clerk. DATED: April 22, 1971 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH That the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING By:-Paul C..,Jones City Clerk . of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said net--- paper at least ne issue Co commencing from the 2.9 t h day of A r i l '7 17, 19_-Z11, and ending the on t day of h April �.— ' 19_14 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and -"- times.of.publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the regular .'and entire issue of said newspaper proper, and not in a supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following dates, to-wit: Apr- 29 , 1971 Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 0 t h day of April , 19_21 , Notary Public Orange County, California THOM4AS D. WYLLIE r J S y NOIJry f3L'b1j r..t',d i;i6rflia m (Change County r ` My C1:ri kS1rn Expires L September 12, 1974 ILHI CZE CODE Div. 11 293 ii{I'T.,TL ROADS l,iUT OI'-a 1,Ot� FU LI USL 21107.7 (a) ,,Lny city or county may, by ordinance or resolution, find and declare that there are privately owned and maintained roads as described in said ordinance or resolution within the city or county that are not generally held open for use of the public for purposes of Vehicular triivel but by reason of their proximity to or connection with high<,,ra.ys the interests of any residents residing along such roads and the motoring public will best be served by application of provisions of this code to such roads. No such ordinance or resolution shall be enacted unless there is first filed with the city or county a petition requesting such by a majority of the ovmers of any such privately owned and maintained road and without a Public hearing thereon and 10 days prior written notice to all owners ' of such road. Upon enactment of such ordinance or resolution, the provisions of - this code shall apply to such privately o,..,ned and maintained road provided appropriate signs are erected at the entrance to the road of such size, share and color as to be readily legible during the daylight hours from a distance o"' 100 feet, to the effe that the road is subject to _uch �)rovisions of this code . (b) The department shall not be renuired to provide -patrol or enforce any provisions of this code on any privately orned and maintained road subjected to the provisions of this code under this section, except those provisions applicable to private property other than l.;y action under this section . (c) ;;_s used in this section "privately ovnzed and maintained roads' includes roads owned and maintained by a city, county or district that are not dedicated to use '-y the public or are not generally held open for use of the public for pur-poses of vehicular traffic. Phi'ITIOl'! Je, the undersigned o,.•mers of Surfside Tract; City of Huntington Beach, Comity of Orange, State of California, do hereby petition the City Council of the City of Huntington 7'each that that nody find and declare the roads in the foregoing area are privately ovmed and maintained and are not generally open to the public for purposes of vehicular traffic, but by reason of their proximity to or connection vrith highways, and that the interests of the undersigned property owners will be best served by applica- tion of the California \Tehicle Code to such roads pursuant to "alifornia lehicle ;,ode Section 21107. 7 l,xr;l ; -.____-- -- --sU�r�I_llla z1110�,:,:TY .�LD:�, ass �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH The document you are viewing contains additional information that is not possible to produce electronically. For information on how to locate this document for viewing , please contact or visit the City Clerk's Office for assistance . 2000 Main Street 2nd Floor — City Hall Huntington Beach CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 i "Ak4 f °� of VW City o ;..;•, ��: � AND ADOPTED by the City Council d on the 17th kuntinEton ®ea6h at a reKular meeting thereof hold day of Mays 1971 . ay,)r ATTESTo ty erk APPROVED AS TO FORM : Y ttorney F ` y ii Ifir Rea. 0e S STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY Or HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected . qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of luntington Beach , and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of maid City, do hereby certify that the whole number of memberm of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach 1s seven; that the foregoing resolution 'was pesAed and adopted by .the affirmative vote of more than w ma,lority of all the members of said City Council at n regular meeting thereof hold on the day of 4 May 19 _, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: hartlett, ;1,1,;;., (; reen, %latney, i'oen, NOES: Councilmen: Nuns ABSENT: Councilmen: yClerk andAK orric o er of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California j J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 73-103 HUNTINCTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator City Council Members Subject TALBERT AVENUE REALIGNMENT Date September 11 , 1973 The City Council asked for a report of the evaluation and feasibility of realigning Talbert Avenue. The previous study regarding this subject was made prior to the deletion of the Route 1 Freeway. Also , the master plan of land use has changed since that study. These factors , plus an update of the master plan of the Bolsa Chica properties and a possible alternate location of Route 39 Freeway, must be taken into account in a study for a relocation. It will take 60 to 90 days to perform the study which will be con- ducted by the Department of Public Works , the Planning Department and Herman Kimmel , a consulting engineer. It is recommended that the decision regarding this matter be postponed until the study is complete. Design work on the presently adopted realignment for that portion between Gothard and Goldenwest has now ceased pending the City ,Council decision. RECOMMENDATION: The:-•City C6unc11_-p.ostpone its decision regarding realignment of Talbert Avenue until completion of the study being conducted by the Department of Public Works . Respectfully submitted, David D . Rowlands City Administrator DDR/gbs ,r f3 Affidavit ^f Publication P %hed ,Hiantin,gtowcBeacll News,,;Jan 12 J RESOLUTIONsK0.�;4015' State of California A RESOLUTION:.`.,OF:"L:THEi,�QI+TY;-COUNCIL; County of Orange SS '.OF.THE CITY„OF`HUNTI.NGTON'BEACH" City Of Huntington Beach ORDERINO�MODIFIC'ATION'L;OF`'.CENTER! George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a I GRADE .GOTHcKA STREET; PUR R citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. PSUANT T TOo L THE .CH'ANGE OF' GRADE•ACT OF 1909; That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach WHEREAS, 'by, Resolution" No. 3985,.' News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- adopted'becember,9, 1974, the.city'Coun lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said oil�of the 'City ,of Huntirigton'.,,Beach; pursuant to ,Divisidn7.9, Part- ,of-,of :the. County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination California -.Streets;. andw Highways, .Code of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide ;Sections:• 800o •.et•�•se'J,, ,"Change`. .of subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been 3rade 'Act..,of 1909,"` expressed-.,its in-. established, printed and published in the State of California, and eni* .to' modify.,the: center.,line grade, County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication cf'•,Gothard;.-Street ,at,,;locatrons specifik ,allys t forth`.in,such•resoluiion; and . of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not The:resolution of intention.was posted, devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any and•published ,in the„-time and _manner,' particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or prescribed by,yecti.ons 8623.tbrough 8026 any number thereof. of ,the California ,Sfreets<and Highways': The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper "Ode;'and` ° h' - ��N'o'�.prdtests tovsuch'';oliang�eof�grade ha-, of general circulation by Judge G, K. Scovel in the Superior Court ving o.een:filed with theGityCler.k'withih of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. the,th,rfyyday period,provided by law,the ,City"Counoil. hereby acquires °and• now; htF';3O L_tJ ri'.I C)N T' 1' has juris'diction, pursuant:to••section,8060; Tha the `�< > it 'skid,`Struts.,ind,Highways Code, to make;,its`.order:'fo'r'.';modificationof the' center'"line's,"of`'`Gottiard"Street,.. NOW, THEREFORE;"'BE IT"•RESOLVED; of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- that the;,, ity council, of the. City of; Huntingttin Beachl''does' hereby torderr `hat., the:'rcenter. line 'grade''of x Street�6Ee' Gothard)>modified asp„follows: . ' at least T1r� if-,S ue ' paper ��Tha�Ql:°portion !of",Gbthard ;Street com= meniling at a,poipt',:50't feet south of.the°1 �'j t1 T<�11Iz� I ,entEr•y'line',of,,Warner„''Avenue and ex-.a. commencing from the _ day of ,zr tending to a :,point. 800 feet.•sou th of! :he"center line"of;,.V{arner .'Avenue. with] 19?�_ and ending on the I'Li y Ja,C)'-.j�a,T'y he to,, incremental\- variations �— da of rom ezistingf BYatle1. . (a) Grade` low feet 100 ,feet, south .of, Warner,Avenue. 19�—, both days inclusive, and as often during said period and ''.(e),6ri de,!lowei,6d',osa'-.feet zoo feet, times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the south of''Warn& avenue: regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not jn a (q) Grade rnoer`ee r�u6.3 ''feet 300 feet south of`Warn`er'�Aven`ue: supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following ('d) Grade.?raised _1.17 feet" 506 -`feet' dates, to-wit: south of Warner Avenue. ''(ej Grade"; raised , 1':G9'.feet 600 feet: south.of Warner Avenue.' J t1^ 29 -1 c)"15 (f),Grade`,,ralse'd .81 feet 700�feet,•south ,if Warner Avenue. That portion. of Gothard';Street 'com- mencing ,at a point 800, feet' north`.of, the center lineof Taibe_rtAvenue and'ex= tendin.g'to a, point 1600 feet"north`of'thei y-. -" �f2•:'�n'— canter line of Talbert Avenue, 'with" 1 ,Publisher ife following' incremental; variations From 'existing"grade: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 t`,h day of (a) Grade,raised 0.5 feet 900 feet north I of Talbert Avenue, ,(b) Grade' raised 3.3 feet 1000 feet Ja rIu r y 19 north pf ;Talbert Avenue. ( ),';,' tide raised. ,,5.9..feet 1100 'feet i0,rf(j:iof Talbert,AvenueI •/$1�ra?/' "J'�- :i- `G �� Notary Public raised' 5'.2 feet 1200'i feet Orange County, California north.;,of Talbert,Aven'ue. .,"(e)'(irade"raised' 3:4 feet' 1300•'-feet north,,of Talbert Avenue. ,.'jij`.''Grade i lowered" 0.5' feet- 1400.feet - ---- __ no`rth,'ofTalbert Avenue: THOMAS D. - -_-0 (gY;Grade- lowered 0.7 feet 1500•.feet WYLLIE ' ' Notary r not Fi:'•`ofXTalbert'Avenue: . .. •-- r y Public-C r i a alifornia ' ,PASEED.,AND. ADOPTED' by the City r :a Orange County 1 Council'bf"the,'Citylof Huntington Beach r c"�wan My Commission I of"a,'`regular;meeting'thereof'held\on .the a Expires 1 20.th",day of,January, 1975. --------------September 12, 1978 1 ALVI,N M_. OEN ------- Mayor ATTEST:` ALICIA, M,'WENTWORTH City Clerk, STATE!OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY.OF ORANGE' } ss. CITY'`OF HUNTINM'176, BEACH J . - 1, 'ALIICIA"'M:",WENTWORTH,:the duly l elected,:qualified"City Clerk' of the City of �Huntin,gton;, Beach, and lex- fficio Clerk of the.City.-Council Hof sa`id-_City; do hereby certify'that the whole,number of ebers`of.'the'City'Council.of the city,,of Huntington" Beach .is' `'seven; .that the foregoing`resolution was passed .and adopted by the .affirmative vote of more than a majority'of,all the.members of said City Council at e'regular meeting thereof, held' on the,20th day of January 1975, by the,,following,vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, ,Bartlett,,Gibbs, Matney, Wieder,:Duke, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None, ABSENT: Councilmen: None ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk .and.ex-officio Clerk of the City CounciP of the City of Huntington Beach;"Caiifornia City of ` ntington Beach County of Orange State of California Jf fidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher 'Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By. Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 4015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDERING MODIFICATION OF CENTER LINE GRADE ON GOTHARD. STREET PURSUANT TO THE CHANGE OF GRADE ACT OF 1909 .WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3985, adopted December 9 , 1974, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pur- suant to Division 9, Part 1 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Sections 8000 et seq. ) , "Change of Grade Act of 1909 ," expressed its intention to modify the center line grade of Gothard Street at locations specifically set forth in such resolution; and The resolution of intention was posted and published in the time and manner prescribed by Sections 8023 through 8026 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and No protests to such change of grade having been filed with the City Clerk within the thirty-day period provided by law, the City Council hereby acquires and now has jurisdiction, pur- suant to Section 8060 of said Streets and Highways Code, to make its order for modification of the center line of Gothard Street , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby order that the center line grade of Gothard Street be modified as follows : That portion of Gothard Street commencing at a point 50 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue and extending to a point 800 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue with the following incremental variations from existing grade : (a) Grade lowered 1. 21 feet 100 feet south of Warner Avenue. (b ) Grade lowered 0. 64 feet 200 feet south of Warner Avenue. 1. 'ahb (c ) Grade lowered 0 . 63 feet 300 feet south of Warner Avenue . (d) Grade raised 1. 17 feet 500 feet south of Warner Avenue. (e ) Grade raised 1. 69 feet 600 feet south of Warner Avenue. (f) Grade raised . 81 feet 700 feet south of Warner Avenue That portion of Gothard Street commencing at a point 800 feet north of the center line of Talbert Avenue and extending to 'a point 1600 feet north of the center line of Talbert Avenue, ;with the following incremental variations from existing grade : (a) Grade raised 0 . 5 feet 900 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (b ) Grade raised 3. 3 feet 1000 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (c ) Grade raised 5 . 9 feet 1100 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (d) Grade raised 5 . 2 feet 1200 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (e) Grade raised 3. 4 feet 1300 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (f) Grade lowered 0 . 5 feet 1400 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (g) Grade lowered 0 . 7 feet 1500 feet north of Talbert Avenue . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of January, 1975 . 0 Ma or ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk Ci Atto ney v' APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: e City Administrator 2 . s tl•"Fltifrrtit� ~`'�` '� 'mac: State of California County of Orange ss SOL,,fAT��"- ` F°`ft�1Z'CITY COUNCIL A. a rrr7a raaaartt ' City of Huntington Beach idT1R1;fC"M 0 FY Zltir"GR George F:rquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a `.,O�: 'stI�-lUh1i"•81°fg� ;V_R6 ,AR�t=HTb' citizen of thy`' United States, over the age of twenty-one years. ,THE CHANGE0F'aftaDa"aCT'OF'`tflas 7`lie`•c�ty'Cisiincil:'ofi't�ieitjla?Fiuein${ That he i;, the printer `and publisher of the Huntington Beach tong f3eacfi"does lieraffy i:relve''' News, a week?y newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lows: r w, dished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said ' i S�QTfOttl.'1". "�Pu•rsvarpt"lo. b)n3eic�n-'�9h "County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination Flirt i;ofAhe Streets afiaf<ii9gh nia, ,Code of local and'other news of a.general character, and has a bona fide .."the'State,of;,0611forniA, (scalene soao subscription list of paying subscribers, and said ef-seq:);,!'cfi8'nge°of_.I,-. AeY gf"a�9y p p paper has been the City"';C' iCif 'of'th®',Ciky of Heim= established; printed and published in the State of California, and inktbrl tit s: County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication �"tentlon;to;Ynodlfy!hr"ke+ r1 r}�in_; ' d"• of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not of,,Getherrd "street, dy,esorifred,as�;fONows:' devoted to the:interest of, or.published for the entertainment of any ;r.'i<�atorti0n `at;tiotfiarli"rgieet 'com- particular class, profession, 'trade, calling, race or denomination, or !hencitug',at,.a paint'',U $eet"sbi€ti�'o;"tfie any number thereof. dbnter;4.t(ne.'of'`.Werner,Ave s''s vnm ;cif= tdiidir{ :t'#o a•point @00:ferst,`south,:of,:the' The. Huntington Beach New was adjudicated,a legal newspaper centeritfie:;of warner,Avee'nue "with„tfie of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior'Court tit t�r tidwiiig.'inc'rementai"siaeriations'frorh''eif= i�ting''grade:,„ of Orange*County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. {a),Prgpcsed f'g�ade,,`tawetbsl. 11 fe AiD,feet;south of:;Warner Avenue. +° n- 0 �' (b) Proposed grade lowered A64,feet,. That the R}'� f)1 1 J.i I ?,J IV(). t F3`i zoo f�eet':south of-Werner:A"ver+iie., (c) Proposed grade lowered '0,63 300 feet`.'south'of Warner,-AveiWe:' '+ (d) f�rsosed "grade;+raised ',1:17 `;fe2tr of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- Sao feet,;south°o f_vdarner'..venue. ' (e).',Prbposed graderaised'1.69'feet=6DU,� eet'sotth"'of VJarner'`Avenue., l t W r1 ;l i;U e aj ,."(f). Proposed..grade,raised :.k'•feei'JdU-, paper at least :eet south`of warner;Ave nue:. .. That portion of Gottiard: street com- nencing,at.a j�point 6U0 jeet'0 iih.'of'` commencing from the 12th day-of ,[tE'CE'f(it;f?1" the ceri3er .line of Taltiert,.Ave 64 `and+ • xtentiins' `to,a point 166b;feet _ •nah ,9f fie•cent Ae,'e t �with',and ending on,the 1 t rt, day of L e C.t'f(i t.f'I' he foll6wing iacrercrrreabtai'.vatiaY3o4rs'frorii'"Oh- and ;gradef, (.a).Proposed grade vrafsed A.5 ieet"90o 197�' ' both daysinclusive and as often during said eet north o¢•Taibert'.Averiue:.,• "> g period and times of publication as said paper,was regularly issued and in the (b) Proposed"grade'raised 3;3':feet IORUi ' P P g Y F .:eel' north�of Talbert ��Avgnue. •' ' regular and entire issue of said p p proper; 'pews a er, ro er and not in a (c)Proposed'gradeYais'ed:u5:9;feet;i30, supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following feet norm of Talbert Avenue.' dates; to-wit: (d) Proposed grade'raised-5.2`rce"t'iaba9 feet north vfa,Talbert Avenue.'. `,;;- (e),Pi6006ed eade`raised'3'4` Dec �1 11eu :Meet north af'Talbert Avenue:-. ' !e'(f);used grade;lowe'red U.5:feet"146,OL, t nort h'of,Talbert Avenue. r. ,�f?raposed grade-lowered 0"feet 15UQ , V-A " Iof Talbert Avenue: ''// y ""Sill ON 2. The"City,CIerk,'is:'hereby,< ts Y' .. c?•� 7' +�f r;"�i di to'post this"resolytion; i' �htidii•"for 'two days 'cgnspicuovsfy,;;on Publisher fCr rie �thfl Council Chamtier",'d6o s',:and; Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 th day Of in adfiition stiall-publishth,' ,"isa'lutfon' by two insertions "in the "Huntington 'Beach:'News,",a new'spape,.'aF,-gerr ;�clr I E,G f i l� f�r, r��� culation, printed'and pubiishOt!`ig,, unt 19 ' ingto'n Beach, California. �- sEcf l6l i 3.' Pie Director:=af rPulilic 1.1t•. Ct.iS l ��Lr�,r- WorkS.shall cause,cOpies;'of.'�a..n(stice of; • X/ Notary Public the Passage'of'this resoiution.Jif.1hf"-d Orange County, California 'tion°: be',;donspicuou3ly posted"au gt a l pdgrtions''of,dothar'd'street wlie`re^sych €fc'ations'of,irade:as set,forthYtie'rein` ---------------------- ar'e 'roposed'to .be'ntade;','at rii3t`riioia - .. i THOMAS. D. 1NYLL(E tnaRiflao;geoc;ln d,istanee.a iut"rio"t' " ^,r less..Afien three not ices:'fn,ate `4'A' 2'r i J Notary Puislic•California p0s- , Sakti ifi it ':shsil COittefiiM t '. j Orange Cour•fy �,repu ment§0ol,,' thy.-Gal1,'01i" r a and', i�,h�AtaYs'Cocte"' ec# h;fl025: s My Commission Expires 'StON' 0' 'ftie,.:DiriecEbr,".of `1'utsfit'' f •"` September 11, 1978 i I'VVotks;"iPu aht`to°St k" ;ii Pltt !'si ------------ ------------ - Section 26, shall " o'" nryila►r 'rrdtiC�'kit'�;s $�iisJJttetl,`kiy,istib.'ifvs�sr'tiot+s{ th8"Mun'tington°8eacr'iNs,i .:;neWs p2}Der eral c(PciiF @23#r W t„ iitli' j ;publiaPtea '1h " i$Yitt if + {?,1'."'wsF YCyif�'aY''AVi a 1"', ' f i- i . u is@Vp on Published Huntingt9--®ea0 News, Dec. 19, D66. 26,,1974, State of California J�PTIFE OF CHk..lE Of GRADg' County of Orange ssCity of Huntington Beach A.ids, bir;qRi �:olt: �co�Ndr Cl A#.'14''Nfl siTt►�.scdaat George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a i XtiTv`ta�i. D`" ' �4[ttFh! Tti .. .N citizen of the United States, over the age Of twenty-one years. 1; d,t4 or doITbfkft.6i s����T. 6+f�" That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach ; HY• Yfi'7HE 'CF�ANGE•;,�F y L3a ll y newspaper general circulation of t®ti3. '" News a weekly news a er of printed and pub- .City,Council'of the'=City: lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said Beach does ,herbtiy reservers' County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide ECTION. 1. Pursubm, to •Dipislon`' ;• subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been Pan k of the streets eRd Hl'frWays established, printed and published in the State of California, and �of`#is stikte:of'CaiNo'rpias5'(S ions,SDDfI County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication 'et='se Rj,�`Charrge of G`YBde•¢ 'iyF 19t1 1 ithet t3itY; Gburicit."Of the �r if,.F4ti of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not �416..01 ,111*6 hereby, declares its= I devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any ten,bbn-.fo rn dify;the r6r011K line gev" 4 particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or c4'G--"9 reet,.:descrltied;i, - foil any number thereof. jh*tt portion of;raofFiarci'-§treat ntifncirr` xat;.a'point A f et AtKf.oft, The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper oetiter;_ " " of. W, r4er, A±ienuet. I d,':e of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior.Court tf rKfPnglt a.`poiirt 80D,foes .aF::tfie of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. ce0te!", it 10,of W&,er:Averttre with?t fbttowitl�� rei,•varietiorrs froth -rtzs ezisti lei) ? , .] . „ •. . ;, lE,�I liTIoy, N� t That the �QS 1a5. ';.grade; iowe> ra? .1,a1 feet rPttr;pfeWarner Avenue. (tr) ed; gied lowered 0.64--feet NOTICE OF UHANGE OF (aiLqllF, 20D feet:'saui !of�Warrier Avenue . of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- 0 �roposad graibe lowered 'b:63"fe9t, 30 'feet south bf?Warner Avenue. (d)rProposgd graite'raised 1.27 1eef 5001 t feet south of Warner Avenue.,, two is slips I iP f� paper at least (e) Proposed grade`raised 1.69 feet �00, feet south of Warner Avenue. (f) Proposed grade raised .81 feet 700 commencing from the 1`]t r) day of t)f'C efribe r Feet south'of Warner Avenue. That portion of Gothard Street com- mencing at a point 800 feet north of the 19 and ending On the r Fth day of 1�euPmber center line of Talbert Avenue and ex- lending to a point 1600'feet north,of the center line of Talbert'Avenue, with the, 19 4 both days inclusive and as often during said following 'incremental variations from y g period and existing grade:times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the (a) Proposed g,rade raised 0.6 feet'900' regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a feet north of Talbert Avenue. supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following (b) Proposed grade raised 3.3 feet 1000 dates, to-wit: feet north of Talbert -Avenue. (c) Proposed grade raised 5.9 feet 1100, feet north of Talbert Avenue. Dec, 19 Dec,( rJ 6 ' 9 24 (d) Proposed grade raised 5.2 feet 1200 feet north of Talbert Avenue: (e) Proposed grade raised 3.4 feet 13M feet north of Talbert Avenue. (9 Proposed grade lowered 0.5 feet 1400 i / feet north of Talbert Avenue. . a 7 r d r�'t �...t� (g) Proposed grade lowered 0J feof "�— 15oo feet north of Talbert Avenue. Publisher SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 1tk) day of directed to post this resolution of. in- tention for two days conspicuously on or near the Council Chamber doors, and. December, 19 7�� in addition shall publish such resolution, by two insertions in the Huntington Beach News, a. newspaper of general �`` •-' circulation, printed and published in Notary Public 1 Huntington. Beach, California. Orange County, California SECTION 3. The Director of Public Works shal4 cause copies of a notice of the passage of this resolution of.inten- _ tion to be conspicuously posted along- -- • --•-----; all portions of Gothard Street where.-such THOM,4S D. WYl LSE modifications of glade as.set forth herein are proposed to be,made, at,.not,,more Notary Public-California i than 100 feet in distance apart, but not Y ro `O Orange Coun+y ; 'less than three notices-,in,all shalt be" My Commission Expires i posted. Such notice shall conform to the requirements of the California Streets Sep+ember 12, 1978 i and Higtways Code"Section 88257., --'--' SECTION 4. The Director- of Publio Works, pursuant to Streets and`Highways Section 8026, shall also cause .similar notice to be published by two insertions in the Huntington Beach News, a ndws- paper of general„circulation, printed and published in Huntington� Beach, Cali- fornia. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of. Huntintgon Beach at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of,Decembdf, 1974. ALVIN M. COEN, Mayor ATTEST: ALICIA M. WEIVTWORTH •City ,Clerk ernrr nr rn�,.rnvnnn t • I i'7w RESOLUTION NO. 3985 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OF INTENTION TO MODIFY THE GRADE OF GOTHARD STREET PURSUANT TO THE CHANGE OF GRADE ACT OF 1909 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows : SECTION 1. Pursuant to Division 9 , Part 1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California ,(Sections . 8000 et seq. ) , "Change of Grade Act of 1909 ," the City _Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby declares its intention to modi- fy the center line grade of Gothard Street , described as Pol- lows : That portion of Gothard Street c'ommencing at a point 50 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue and extending to a point 800 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue with the following incremental variations from existing grade : (a.) Proposed grade lowered 1. 21 feet 100 feet south of Warner Avenue : (b ) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 64 feet 200 feet south of Warner Avenue. r (c ) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 63 feet 300 feet. south of Warner Avenue. (d) Proposed grade raised 1. 17 feet 500 feet south of Warner Avenue. (e ) Proposed grade raised 1. 69 feet 600 feet south of Warner Avenue.. (f) Proposed grade raised . 81 feet 700 feet south of I Warner Avenue. j That portion of Gothard Street commencing at a point 800 �. . 1. JOC : ahb feet north of the center line of Talbert Avenue and extending to, a point 1600 feet north of the center line .of Talbert Avenue, with the following incremental variations from existing grade : (a) Proposed grade raised 0 . 5 feet 900 feet north of. Talbert Avenue. (b) Proposed grade raised 3. 3 feet 1000 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (c) Proposed grade raised 5. 9 feet 1100 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (d) Proposed grade raised 5. 2 feet 1200 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (e) Proposed grade raised 3. 4 feet 1300 feet north of - Talbert Avenue. - (f) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 5 feet 1400 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (g) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 7 feet 1500 feet north of Talbert Avenue. ` SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this s resolution of intention for two days conspicuously on or near the ' Council Chamber doors, and in addition shall publish .such resolution by' two insertions in the Huntington Beach 'News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington 'Beach,. California. SECTION 3. The Director of Public Works shall cause copies of a notice of the passage of .this resolution of inten- tion to be conspicuously posted along all portions of Gothard Street where such modifications of grade as set forth herein. are proposed to be made, at not more than 100 feet in distance apart ; but not less than three notices in all shall be posted. Such notice shall conform to the requirements of. the . California Streets and Highways Code Section 8025 . SECT-ION 4 . The Director of Public Works , pursuant to Streets and Highways Section 8026, shall also cause similar notice to be 2. I ' 4 published by two insertions in the Huntington Beach .News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. .PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December, 1974 . -Z' Ma r ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOI0 i1110 Ci C r, City Atto ney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Administrator I i • i i i y i 3• Res. No. 3985 STATE OF CALIFORI& ) COMY OF OUNIS CITY OF NWIMTON BEACH ) 1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, gualifiod City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole n er of membere of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmtive Grote of more then a majority of all the members of said City Council � . . at a regular adjournedmeeting thereof held on the 9th of December 14 74 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: 012IRV, Gibbs, MatneY, Wieder, RMe, Coen- ROES:. Councilman: t . Amine ' ABSENT: Councilmen: Bartlett a j i c ~ City Clerk and ex-officio'Clerk i. of .the City Council of the .City ..< . . of Huntington Beach, California The foregoing instrument is.a correct copy of �. :. the.original on file in this office. Attest _ - ....lo......19.e?I". City_Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal'. i • i i AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF HEARING OF INTENTION TO MODIFY THE GRADE OF GOTHARD STREET State of California ) County ,of Orange ) He E. Hartge, being duly sworn deposes and says: That he is now and was during all the times mentioned the duly appointed, qualified and acting Street Superintendent of the City of Huntington Beach, in said County and State. That on the 9th day of December 1974 , the City Council of said City passed its Resolution of Intention No. 3985, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach of Intention to Modify the grade of Gothard Street pursuant to the change .of Grade Act of 1909. " That after, adoption of said Resolution he posted conspicuously along the street and property described in said Resolution, notices of the adoption of said Resolution and headed, "Notice of Intention to •Modify" one of which notices, similar to the notice posted as aforesaid is. annexed hereto and made a part hereof: That he completed all the posting of said notices and on the 12th day of December 1974, and thereafter' he made this affidavit and filed it with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach. . E. Hartge Street Superintendent Subscribed and sworn to before' me this day of ..---1974 . City (Clerk i {, - ''v`��t,�'S#:. �*{9>#'.vi•,dY�.:gr�a .,,- '?�'.,«�i�'�•:,t�8 sdiwa :y�•,iaF tk x- 'rta+ ., �Ssc'�r'�zA' 'o;K.em�.»•� �-';� .. -. -, � .. � - i OF 1 NOTICE OF 'CHANGE CRADE I. " ,sue ®� CITY OF HUNTINGTON € INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Bill Hartge - From Alicia M. Wentworth, Director of Public Works City Clerk Subject Notice of Change of Grade = Date January 13, 1975 �Gothard Street - Res. N6. 3985 i The deadline for protes�§ to be received relative to the proposed change of grade on Gothard Street was January 12, 1975. This office has received no protests to date. As we understand W, the next step is to inform Council that no protests have been received and to recommend that a public hearing be set for the February 3, 1975 meeting. This letter can be submitted to Council at their January 20, 1975 meeting. AMW:cb:cb cc: Jack Miller 77 j Affidavit of P -blication Published Hu ton Beach",News, Dec. 12,,,,Dec. 19, 1S. State Of California RESO,IsUTIO,Nk NO. 3985 County of Orange S's A�RESDLU',TlON;�''bF;THE.CITY COUNCIL Cit of Huntin ton Beach "_D ';1C, Et;CI'fY OF HUNTINGTON.BEACH Y g OfANTENTION_.TO MODIFY THE GRADE George F, -quhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a 0'F GOTHARD STREET' PURSUANT.TO citizen of th„ United States, over the age of twenty-one years, THE CHANGE OF GRADE ACT OF 1909 1L the The.-City Council,of'the City of Hunting- That he printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach ton Beach does hereby resolve as fol- News, 'a week?p newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lows: lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said SECTION 1. Pursuant to Division 9, County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination Part-1 of the Streets and Highways Code of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide of the State'of California (sections.a000 subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been at seq.), 'Change of Grade'Act of 1909," established, printed and published in the State of California, and the City Council of the`City of Hunt- P P iington Beach'.'h4reby :'declares; its',in' County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication tention to,�modify the center line grade of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not of Gothard 'Street, described as follows: devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any That portion of Gothard ,Street com- particular class, profession, 'trade, calling, race or denomination, or centeing at.a point 50 feet south of the enterline of Warner Avenue and ex- any number thereof. tending to a point'800 feet south of the The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper center line of Warner Avenue with the of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court isting.grade: incremental variations from ex- of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 b order No. A-5931. Sting.grade: g g Y ':(a),Proposed `grade 'lowered` 1.21 feet l'00 feet, south of Warner Avenue. (b) Proposed grade lowered 0.64 feet That the iS. '`!'' � ' d 11( 200 feet south of Werner Avenue. (c) Proposed grade lowered 0:63 feet 300 feet south of Warner Avenue. (d) Proposed grade,=:Yaised 1.17' feet of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- 500 feet.south'of Warner Avenue. (e),Proposed grade raised 1.69 feet 600 eet.souah of Warner"Avenue. -- r z ,t;„ (f) Proposed grade raised .81 feet 700 paper at least e eet south:of Warner,Avenue., Tha-t,portion ,of Gothard Street .com -, mencing .aca.-point 800 feet north of Commencing from the -' k "'h day of idt`':9E%iilY)e=r the `center line of Talbert Avenue, and .xfending to.a Point '16b0 feet north of: r he center line of Talbert'=Avenue, 'with 19' and ending on the ��-t day Of E;C``' (ii c', he following incremental,'variatio'ns from -xisting'grade: (a)-Proposed grade raised ,0.5 feet 900; 19Y��)' both days inclusive, and as often during said period and eet north 6f•Talbert'Avenu6' times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the (b) Proposed grade raised 3:3 feet 1000 feet' north of Talbert Avenue. regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a (c) Proposed grade'raised 5,9`feet 1100 supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following feet north.,of Talbert Avenue. dates, to-wit' (d) Proposed'grade"raised 5.2 feet 1200; ,feet north'.of.Talbert Avenue. (e) Proposed grade raised 3.4',feet 1300'; ifeet north,,of Talbert Avenue. %-(f),Proposed grade'lowered 0.5;1eet 1400', :,feet north.of Talbert'Avenue. ',fly):"Proposed-grade lowered 0.7,feet 1500 feeV.,fio`rth:of Talbert,Avenue: SEGTI'6N:A`2., The City Clerk "is hereby directed:to'•post this"resolution of in- `teiii6n.:;for two days conspicuously on 1 Publisher or near the.Council Chamber doors, and in addition, shall"'publish such resolution Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of by two insertions, in the Huntington Beach,News,',a newspaper of general cir-' • culation, printed'and puali'shed'in'Hunt-' 19 ingtdn,Beach, California. " SECTION 3., The Director of Public` Works shall cause copies of a notice of ,,.-�;r.,<>t. NotaryPublic the passage of•'this 'resoluti'on, of inten r Orange County, California lion., be conspicuously,posted along: all portions of'Gothard,'Stree"t where'such m6dilfications,of:grade'as set forth'herein, - -•-�.�. �___ _ are 'p'ropose"d '.to.'be. ;made, rat'hot_:more'' - 'THOM AS D�WYLLI E i; than".,1oo'feet`i,'n,`'d,i'stance,�apart,,:but not; i less,than "three notices in„all shall.be�: j`lafary Puk�lic-California � I P�osted,.,;,Such-no'Mice shallconform=ta,'tlie;, Orange County i irequlrQments of the "California Streets l , and H:,ghways"code Section,,$025 - My Camm Expires issi®n Expi , � , �S��TION-,'• 'The ,'Director. ".of Public! °a September 12, 1978 'Works;'pu'rsuant;to?Streets'and',Hi'ghWays'1 - --------------------------- Secti6n '8026, shall "also 'cause `similar. `notice<to.b'e"pu,biisFfed by.two'insertions`. i:in 'the -Hun'tington'Beach , ews, ,a„nevi's-.II paper"of,general 'circullation, �printed:and',I published in `Huntington 'Beach, for nia., P%1$SED .AND; 'ADOPTED_ byg 46t ,°City ``Oatijai6l�of,:the City,.af;:'FI'ii.n`tintbn.beach 11ai and„adjournetl regular metting thereof:, 1d''on"the 9th day of "db6ernber,'1974.`', ALVIN"M.:COEN Maybr:` A7TESTi 'ALICIA N1:'WIENTW6AY'14 City:`Clee'k,,, xS TATE"O F,„CAL"'I FO,t2 N lA OOUNT '`OF,;;ORANGE: CITY:OF`HUNT4NTON`$' CH "I,;;AL'ICJA„;M. 1NEN�NORIH,. `th;e_'2fulyi; 'ejectetl;,l`qua,dI idd;City,'66 k''of 'tho'CiYy, -,,,& Huntirii i6h„`Eieach, ;'arid ex=6fficio' 'Clerk of,'the,.City..,'Councll of'saitl,'Cty,. tjo,hereby 'cer"tif'y,fhaf the Whole nuniber.F ^`of 'morn,b'ers of,';"h,b City Council 'of ;tfYe;' City ;of.i,Huntiragton.'O�ach ,is.';gyen; that. the"foregoing resolution was;'pass, d'an,d "adopted;;oy;.the'aff,irmative vote„of more::;, #han a major",i,Y of all the iiiembers '10 said ,City„Councii.at.:a;'regular-,adjourned, rriee2iijg,thereof Heid`onth`e,"9th 'day of; 'Di''celnber,1974,'iby°the�`f6liov�irr�g`voCe:• AYES; Co'uncilme•n; Shipley;Sdibbs,,'Mafiney, Wieder;'15dke,;'Coen `NOES: `Councilmen None ;;ABSENT: Councilmen:: B'srtiett, ALPCIA M.`WENTWbRTH City`"blerk,,and ex,-6fficio CI'erk. of the,City-Council of the City ' '' e� 1-l�ytlirnGa.©i� .�'"iC'.3fi11,'�dfif(Jriii4r , C} of Huntington Reach County of Orange r State of California J ffidavit ofPublication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher 'Huntington. Beach News i Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk I Affidavit of P -blication Publis e hed Hut '.on,-Beach News, Dec. State Of California NOTICE OF-,,CHANG,E,,.OF`GRADE County of Orange SS RESOt UT.tON N0'.3985. City of Huntington Beach ;`A' RESOlUT10N-QF THE CITY-COUNCIL Ofr,THE;CITY"-OF.HUNTINGTON BEACH" George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a o'o' `rINTENTION'•,...To`i"rnoolF,Y THE Citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. b"''DE-°o`F:aoTHAR-6;,STREET� PuR- That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntin ton_Beach svA'', To THE-CH'ANGE';`oF�•GRAf7E-' g ACt OF 1909 News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- .Th'e!,City,' Council of-the City„of;.Hunt-, lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said in t,Qn 7 Beach' does. Hereby.(resolve.gas County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination follows:. ' of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide sEcfiloN .•1., Pursuant;,to.,;Divisidn'9, subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has' been :Fa`t 3-of the streets,and.Hig'hways Code' established, printed and published in the State of California, and iofl.tnea;State-of Ca(ifornia'(Sectioris 8000 County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication et;'seq:)', ;��Cha�nge of G'ra�d`e,act,of, -1909', " p tne;:bity,';Council of -th(i city, of, kun't,� of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper„is not ingto-n,;.-Beach hereby*;declafes its '-i,n devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any ten'tiph rto; modify tlie;:ce`nter`` Ime,gra8'` particular. class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or of.Gotliard`'street,°described:+asy followSii any number thereof. Triafp07tiorn;,of Gitliard 'S;reet' dom : mencing:;at a,point,59+feet-south:.,ot'the: The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper center,Itn'e,i,ofl.;.Wairner Avenue,zaniJ,,.;ex- of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court tentlmg to a point 800 feet south' of Orange County, California.August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. center`, va'riat iineiuof�VVarner';i�Avenu„e'F wltti'ahe folloWing;�;ancreinenfa:f;;; ions from existing gr`ad'e That the - i t±�` t y 4�I 1" .1-�},�[ iV`� '3 9 8:� s. e (a) Proposed grade, lowered 121, feet 100 feet'south of N/arner'Avenu'e p_ (b) Proposed grade to tired 064 feet, . 1Nr . ,(�. -L (1 E t)'q U—IJ A N�;JE �)i'' (;: t)�'.� 200 feet 'south`of Warner,`Avenue. (c) gr Proposed ade lowered--0.63 feet - of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news-,. ;oo f Proposed gr Warner.avenue: (dj Proposed gra de"raised'1.17,feet 5001 4,z',r�y .� I 1p n - feet south'.of,Warner Avenue.':. paper at least (e) Proposed grade raised 1.69'feet'600, feet south .of Warner Avenue. ' (f)"Proposed,;grade raised .81 feet 700 commencing from the L ._ day of OP,C t3I l e 12, feet,south' of warner Avenuei That portion,of 'Gothard' St"reet c6m- me6cing at>a;,point,,800 feet:north'of the i 19 Z , and ending on the r 6tb day of L)E:(;E?'Iilcer center line of Talbert. Avenue and ex- in I tendg to a?point 160Tfeef`hoitH-of the center .line,of,Talbert,,Avenue,, with ,the', followin'g_ me"rementad''variations� -from 19 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and existing grade:r -_ times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the "' regular and entire issue of said p proper, @a).Proposed=;g�rade"raised. o.s-feet '900, gU pews paper ro er, and not in a feee`n�oith'°of.Talb'ert'Avenue: supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following ':(b),Proposed grade raised'3.3 feet'1000 dates, to-wit' feet north.;of Talbert Avenue. (c),Proposed,grade'.raised 5.9 feet 1100, 7 r feet.north,,,6f`�Talbert ,Ave n ue,. i7tr (d)',Proposed,grade raised 5.2,feet 1266 _ feet north' of Talb'drt Avenue. (e),Proposed>grade raised,3.4 feet 1300:,j feet north',of-Talbert 'Avenue.. 1 (f) Propcseil,;grade l6wered.0.5 feet_1400 ieet"north of;T,alb'ert'Awenue. _ .,�. C-,.•.y�•s-,.� (g) Propos`ed grade" lowered 0.7 feet J Publisher 1500�feet,north of. Talbert Avenue. --SECTION 2;.',The City Clerk Iis hereby Subscribed and sworn to before me this = ?7 j t=, day of directed to post'this resolution of"in- ' tention for,.two days' conspicuously, on. or near ttie`Council•Chamber doois;'and - i,)e ce InbP,Y' 19 " in.-addition shall publish!such resolution bye two; insgrtions in.' the Huntington Beach News,' a,newspaper of general circulatio'n;,-.'printe"d and' published in: Notary Public Huntington:-beaoN,^California.. Orange County, California SECTION 3. The "Director of Public ,Wclrks,.shall cause copies of.a notice of _ the passage.of this-resolution of, inten- -------- tion'-fo be conspicuously- posted along. ---TH�� p `- -- -- a1 l-p0 tiorns,of Gothard'Street where such wY( [�E ! modifica�tiois of'grade:as.,get forth-herein are proposed to be made,;at: not,.more Notary public-California than 100 fleet in distance apart, but not, Orange County ,(ess::tha,n•three,,notices,in-,a11 shall be , My Commission. Expires i posted. Such,�notice shall conform to-the requirements of the, California Streets _----- ---5ep+ember 12, 1978 i and Highways Code' Section 8025` ---- • -'" SECTION 4. The Director of Public Works,,pursuant to;Streets and Highways Section 8026, shall also cause.,similar ,notice to be published by two insertions 'in the Huntington Beach- News, a news- paper of-general circulation,.printed and published in' Huntington Beach; .Cali- fornia. PASSED' AND ADOPTED by.the.,City Council'of'the City of-,Huntintgon Beach at an adjourned-regular meeting thereof held on the 9th:day of December, i974. ALVINI-M. COEN',' Mayor ' ATTEST: ALICIA V. 'WENTWORTH City. Clerk STATE OF CA ' COUNTY'OF ORANGE } ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON'BEACH .I; ALICIA: M-.,-WENTWORTH, the duly' elected, qualified City Clerk of the City: of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk.of the City CouncWof said City,'do.here-` by certify: that th"e whole. number' of " member's of the City`Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing' resolution was passed and adopted'by.the affirmative.vote of more than a-majority`of'all the members of said City,Council.at a-regular adjourned, meeting -thereof held on.the 9th day. of, December, 1974, by the following'.vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley,'Gibbs, Matney, Wieder, Ouke; Coen' NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: B artl ett ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of.the•City Council of the City f '! C. of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California a Affidavit ofPublication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher 'Huntington Beach News I i Filed e Clerk By Deputy Clerk I . i R''4 RESOLUTION NO. 3985 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OF INTENTION TO MODIFY THE GRADE OF GOTHARD STREET PURSUANT TO THE CHANGE OF GRADE ACT OF 1909 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows : SECTION 'l. Pursuant to Division 9 , Part l of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (Sections 8000 et seq. ) , "Change of Grade Act of 1909 ," the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby declares its intention to modi- fy the center line grade of Gothard Street , described as fol- lows : That portion of Gothard Street commencing at a point 50 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue and extending to a point 800 feet south of the center line of Warner Avenue .with the following incremental variations from existing grade : (a) Proposed grade lowered 1. 21 feet 100 feet south of Warner Avenue . (b ) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 64 feet 200 feet south of Warner Avenue. (c ) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 63 feet 300 feet south of Warner Avenue. (d) Proposed grade raised 1. 17 feet '500 feet south of Warner Avenue. (e ) Proposed grade raised 1. 69 feet 600 feet south of Warner Avenue. (f) Proposed grade raised . 81 feet 700 feet south of Warner Avenue. That portion of Gothard Street commencing at a point 800 t 1. JOC : ahb s- i ' feet north of the center line of Talbert Avenue and extending to a point 1600 feet north of the center line of Talbert Avenue, with the following incremental variations from existing grade: (a) Proposed grade raised 0. 5 feet 900 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (b ) Proposed grade raised 3 . 3 feet 1000 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (c ) Proposed grade raised 5 . 9 feet 1100 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (d) Proposed grade raised 5 . 2 feet 1200 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (e) Proposed grade raised 3 . 4 feet 1300 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (f) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 5 feet 1400 feet north of Talbert Avenue. (g) Proposed grade lowered 0 . 7 feet 1500 feet north of Talbert Avenue. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to post this resolution of intention for two days conspicuously on or near the Council Chamber doors, and in addition shall publish such resolution by two insertions in the Huntington Beach News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington 'Beach, California. SECTION 3. The Director of Public Works shall cause copies of a notice of the passage of this resolution of inten- tion to be conspicuously posted along all portions of Gothard Street where such modifications of grade as set forth .herein are proposed to be made , at not more than 100 feet in distance apart , but not less than three notices in all shall be posted. Such notice shall conform to the requirements of the California Streets`', ,..,. and Highways Code Section 8025. SECTION 4. The Director of Public Works , pursuant to Streets and Highways Section 8026, shall also cause similar notice to be 2. published by two insertions in the Huntington Beach -News , a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December, 1974. o Ma r ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: W-�Lle� Ci crnr_ City Atto ney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: -'Ce /(J�in City Admstrator j i k 3 y , Re,' No. 3985 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF BUNT INGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and 'ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular adjourned meeting thereof held on the 9th day of December , '19 74 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Gibbs, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Bartlett City Clerk and ex-officio:Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California The foregoing instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office. Attest .... � ! City Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,. Cal. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF HEARING OF INTENTION TO MODIFY THE GRADE OF GOTHARD STREET State of California ) County of Orange ) H. E. Hartge, being duly sworn deposes and says: That he is now and was during all the times mentioned the duly appointed, qualified and acting Street Superintendent of the City of Huntington Beach, in said County and State. That on the 9th day of December 1974 , the City Council of said City passed its Resolution of Intention No. 3985, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach of Intention to Modify the grade of Gbthard Street pursuant to the change of Grade Act of 1909. " That after adoption of said Resolution he posted conspicuously along the street and property described in said Resolution, notices of the adoption of said Resolution and headed, "Notice of Intention to Modify" one of which notices, similar to the notice posted as aforesaid is annexed hereto and made a part hereof: That he completed all the posting of said notices and on the 12th day of December 1974 , and thereafter he made this affidavit and filed it with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach. H. E. Hart g e Street Super%intendent Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ho,-j 1974 . �V�,V4,�e Lity C er NOTICE OF CHANGE OF. GRADE r i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH i To Bill Hartge - From Alicia M. Wentworth, Director of Public Works City Clerk Subject Notice of Change of Grade Date January 13, 1975 Gothard Street - Res. NO. 3985 The deadline for protests to be received relative to the proposed change of grade on Gothard Street was January 12, 1975. This office has received no protests to date. lAs we understand it, the next step is to inform Council that no protests have been received and to recommend that a public hearing be set for the February 3, 1975 meeting. This letter can be submitted to Council at their January 20, 1975 meeting. i I AMW:cb:cb i cc: Jack Miller I I i i i P .0. a �— Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 September 22, 1972 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Resolution No. 1100 ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 1100 a resolution of the City Planning Commission recommend- ing that your Honorable Body direct that all activity related to the alteration of Main Street cease and desist until alternate plans have been considered, and further, that such alternate plans should consider the feasibility of eliminating heavy traffic on Main Street or the partial abandonment of Main Street from Seventeenth Street to Mansion Avenue. The Planning Commission approved said resolution on September 19, 1972, and recommends that your Honorable Body adopt a similar resolution. Respectfully submitted, K.A. Reynold Secretary KAR:j h 40 RESOLUTION NO. 1100 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO STREET IMPROVEMENT ALONG MAIN STREET BETWEEN SEVENTEENTH STREET AND MANSION AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City has begun major alteration of the median strip on Main Street between Seventeenth Street and Mansion Avenue, and WHEREAS, the Main Street median and lighting standards thereon are being changed, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach has determined that such alteration would change the unique character of Main Street and would have a deleterious effect on one of the finest residential. areas within the City of Huntington Beach. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council direct that all activity related to the alteration of Main Street cease and desist until alternate plans have been considered, and FURTHER, that such alternate plans should consider the feasibility of eliminating heavy traffic on Main Street or the partial abandonment of Main Street from Seventeenth Street to Mansion Avenue . REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach,. California, on September 19, 1972 upon the following roll call vote : AYES: Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Kerins, Bazil, Slates, Higgins NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None THE: RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. ATTEST: Marcus M. Porter K. A. Reynolds `�" Chairman Secretary ry WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY I, CITY OF HUNTINvfON BEACH No. BLUE-CITY CLERK GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION 1 Date Request made by Department Sept. 22/72 K.A. Reynolds Planning INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. I Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: I i Attached herewith: 1. Letter of transmittal i 2, lesolution No. 1100 I i I I Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds z___ Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: ��r City Administrator '�e M Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 September 22, 1972 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission RE: Resolution No. 1100 ATTN: David D. Rowlands , City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 1100 a .resolution of the City Planning Commission recommend- ing that your Honorable Body direct that all activity related to the alteration of Main Street cease and desist until alternate plans have been considered, and further, that such alternate plans should consider the feasibility -of eliminating heavy traffic on Main Street or the partial abandonment of Main Street from Seventeenth Street to Mansion=. Avenue. The Planning Commission approved said resolution on September 19, 1972, and recommends . that your Honorable Body adopt a similar resolution. Respectfully submitted, ' K.A. Reynold Secretary KAR:j h f r � ` RESOLUTION NO. 1100 ;.' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING r TO STREET IMPROVEMENT ALONG MAIN STREET BETWEEN SEVENTEENTH STREET AND MANSION AVENUE. WHEREAS, the City has begun major alteration of the median strip on Main Street between Seventeenth Street and Mansion Avenue, and WHEREAS, the Main Street median and lighting standards thereon are being changed, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach has determined that such alteration would ? ' .change the unique character of Main Street and would have a deleterious effect on one of the finest residential areas -: within the City of Huntington Beach. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council direct that all activity related to the alteration of Main Street cease and desist until alternate plans have been considered, and FURTHER, that such alternate plans should consider the feasibility of eliminating heavy traffic on Main Street or the partial abandonment of Main Street from Seventeenth Street to Mansion Avenue. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach,. California, on September 19, 1972 upon the following roll call vote: i AYES: Porter, Wallin, Boyle,. Kerins , Bazil, Slates, Higgins NOES: None ABSTAIN: . None ABSENT: None k . ti THE RESOLUTION WAS. ADOPTED. ATTEST: 1 r Marcus M. Porter K. A. Reynold Chairman Secretary S WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY BLUE-CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINt,"ON BEACH No. ' - GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by DepaPr Planning Sept. 22/72 K.A. xe yn�olds lj nin g INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must, be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or hereby requested: Attached herewith: 1. Letter of transmittal 2. Resolution No. 1100 �E Desired effective date' _ Signed: Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance $ity'Attorney—Please prepare,and submit printed copies to this office by: i" City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 1100 A--RES.OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO STREET IMPROVEMENT ALONG MAIN STREET BETWEEN SEVENTEENTH STREET AND MANSION AVENUE. .. WHEREAS, the City has begun major alteration of the median strip on Main Street between Seventeenth Street and Mansion Avenue, and , j WHEREAS, the. Main Street median and lighting standards thereon are being changed, and i s WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach has determined. that such alteration would change the unique character of Main Street and would have a deleterious effect . on one of the finest residential areas within the City of Huntington Beach. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning !',. . Commission recommends that the City Council direct that all : t activity related to the alteration of Main Street cease and desist until alternate plans have been considered, and FURTHER, that such alternate plans should consider the feasibility of eliminating heavy traffic on Main _ Street or the partial abandonment of Main Street from Seventeenth Street # to Mansion Avenue. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the Planning Commission t of the City of Huntington Beach,. California, . on September 19, 1972 upon the following toll- call vote: ' AYES: Porter, Wallin, Boyle, Kerins, Bazil, Slates, Higgins NOES: . None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT:. None THE RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED. 3 ATTEST: Marcus M. Porter K. A. Reynold Chairman' Secretary i i , i �1 1� • City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January 5, 1972 Brander Castle Acting Administrator City of Huntington Beach Subject: Street Widening from Prince Development, Inc. Dear Mr. Castle: Transmitted, herewith, is a deed for additional right of way over portions of Slater Avenue, Speer Avenue and Morgan Lane. Said right of way is necessary for the construction of the ultimate street section. It is recommended that you accept the deed and transmit to the County Recorder for recordation. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:BPC:fa i Trans. i I I i � p g �a (D. M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: City Council FROM: City Administrator ����• , DATE: November 20 , 1969 f, Authorization of the City Council is requested to expend $17,430 from the Sewer Fund on a loan basis to acquire property for street access and improvepents as described j an the attached memorandum. The money will be repaid to i the Sewer Fund at a later date:. i I Doyle Miller City Administrator DM:bwo attach. i i . I i I i Via,* OFFICE MEMORANDL To Doyle Miller, City Administrator Date November 7, 1969 ".$ From Director of Public 'Works In Re �k 1 1 � Mr. Hartge's memorandum is forwarded for your approval. Acquisition of these properties will allow us to proceed with an assessment district and have the entrance to Huntington Harbour 'k landscaped b them.::•� P Y It is requested that this be funded from reserves or ,by a loan from the sewer fund. 4,.i Sufficient copies are included for distribution to'council- 1s men. A I - awes R. Wheele Director of Public Works OFFICE MEMORANDUM To James R.. Wheeler, Director of Public Works Date November 4, 1969 From City Engineer In Re 6 r: After approximately two years of negotiations with the Department of V Real Property Services, it appears we now have a firm offer from them for the acquisition of several parcels of land in the vicinity of Warner Avenue and Algonquin Street. You will recall that Huntington Harbour Corporation offered to land- scape the two triangles on the north side of Warner Avenue on both sides of Algonquin Street, in accordance with City requirements, and would dedicate these improvements to the City. We were successful in acquiring portions of the two triangles and the Corporation acquired one parcel, leaving those two colored in yellow and identified as Number ,13 and 14 to be acquired from the County. Parcel 169 also colored in yellow, was requested for a street con- nection of Sandra Lee Street with Warner Avenue opposite the present traffic `., signal. Parcel 18-1, colored in green, was requested so as to install the • street improvements along !farina View and Orion Street in connection with Assessment District No. 6602. A portion of parcel 15, colored in blue, was requested sa as to provide an alley. eonnection to either Sims or Sandra Lee. " As the letter indicates, the Department of Real Property Services is proposing ' 1 that the County of Ora*ge convey to the City all of the parcels mentioned M1 above for the sun of $17,430 plus the construction by the City of street is- proveaents including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage system and pavement along the Warner Avemae frontage of the remaining County property. The Depart-.- man t of Real Property. Servicest.appraisal indicates that Lot 209 consisting of 3,575 square feet, is worth $3,630 and that Lots 17 and 19, consisting of 79015 square feet, is worth $139800 for a-total of $17,430.00. s All of the parcels to be conveyed, with the exception of Ho. • 159 would be for the use of the public. Parcel 15, after the formation of an assessment ' ,*. Y district and the installation of the aforementioned alley, could then be placed . on the market and presumably could be sold for at least $17,000.00. It is recommended that the City agree to the prgposal of the Department of Real Property Services. If this meets the approval of the City, please advise are so that I may contact Mr. Galvan who will then present the matter to the Board of Supervisors. Transmitted herewith are nine (9) copies of the letter from the County of Orange with the attached map. ,I P.M.113 5-13 sa,RRw WARNER 12 N B9°39'54''E U.72 »ooa R•IS 300' 3 pe03°3i 0"E 3464' FG. 5 A=11-28 29' �A SYO Ao R°69000 L=138.1i -Y T.N89.39'S4"E.5000'B e .F�� r 4 8N0°43'22"W T500' 1' 15 F---.v o'fr i/'�✓gaa 9 S99°305<W 50.00 10 \ i ON0°43'22'W 2500 9 W 4 Y 4A PM 1135-14 °of B L N89°3954"E.130.' \\4 2 p=10°4 0 f R=690 00 °�I par 4f ke =31-0 D 4 N89°3954"E 04J 5 NO°43'22"W 7500 a W 7RAr7,>.�0. --- U) V) NO. 349 8 ;1 1 K So 0 50 100 ° A, 2j i M.M. nores: I S-17 / -s N>r/ :fdi et Ne 3 4 $ 4I maps p ov. d%fhe C.r�f Hur�.nyfan Oiach o.M varroua d�aes rrro d o/r0 , _ EdP. r.s.ry G in o d rds Ram Srisrna Roneha 9Ca in dK 9i'y.io3 e�_i A ui U> ana r nd are; rd.nFOR 29/B-33z --R s/rsir�1°C nsr of0 an�s a.v.. /e r/ian_r of wa "09at ki Ler,md.sms �-Rev>a'.si-c rar>r $ rR mop ane+-s n/y n.r nro E�.menr� r.a9r�./pn a %w ORION - — + - — STREET — — s <a Te a ad a ss9F/.nq x wn en S.eFr crr e.n./. Ma v s ,A. era.oe a=sr., �-Pva a ner an„ T, \C7 415 3 Is km. o rn \ a — U) DATE BY APP. REVISIONS w Oa IS k COUNTY OF ORANGE > L 17-19 1e i9z A� DEPARTMENT OF REAL PROPERTY SERVICES .n' I io 941 AA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Q C —Ac Z ( IS .243 Ac WARNER AVENUE AND f Q 13 50 A< ALGONOUIN STREET IN] C IB-1 pp°off°iw� :nnX rm E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 16-1 r wM.•A�r ue a.°ew°° PAR PCL AREA PARCEL PCL MEA CR WN BY R F ON PROVED BY:r/L NOL INEi7 REMARKS NO (NET) REMARK54R GATE 3-5-69 PROJECT N0:P P1135 SHEET 1 OF I ® City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT December 26, 1968 Honorable Mayor and City Council �`� City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller ; City Administrator Subject: Widening of the McFadden Ave. Overcrossing at San Diego Freeway Gentlemen: The attached resolution is to urge the State Divisbn of Highways to budget for the widening of the subject bridge as soon as possible. In order to place this proposed construction in their budget, they must be assured that this City will widen McFadden Avenue to four lanes on either sideoof the overcrossing as soon as they widen the overcross- ing itself. This work will most likely not begin for one or two years. Gas Tax Funds can be used to finance the City's portion of tHs project. Traffic has increased rapidly on McFadden recently with the opening of Golden West College and other development along the high- way. A proposed service road connecting the Huntington Center to McFadden Avenue will generate enough additional traffic on this over- crossing to exceed the present capacity of the highway. It is respectfully requested that your Honorable Body approve this Resolution and direct the City Clerk to return three executed copies to this office for transmittal to the State. Ver truly yours, ames R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:PEC:ae Attach. 0 J® ' City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMEN �ql, October 16, 1968 Q'f Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller f•r,,i; City Administrator / Subject: Goldenwest Improvements CC-097 Pacific Coast Hwy. to Warner Ave. Gentlemen: Within two months plans and specifications will be submitted to the City Council for the widening of Goldenwest Street to a minimum of four lanes from Pacific Coast Highway to Warner Avenue. The project will be financed by gas tax funds and participation by the County of Orange Arterial Highway Financing Program. The Huntington Beach Company in conjunction with a subdivision on the west side of Goldenwest Street from the vicinity of Mansion Avenue to Palm Avenue requested our consideration of a joint project whereby landscaping within the median be installed from Pacific Coast Highway to Mansion Avenue. The Standard Oil Company, by means of a separate agreement with Huntington Beach Company, would participate in the landscaping program along their front- age of Goldenwest Street. As a result of several meetings we have reached an agreementaas to the degree of participation by the Huntington Beach Company. The proposal, at this time, is for the City to bear the cost of a 24, wide strip to be located outside of the median and for the City and the Huntington Beach Company to share equally in the cost of the median construc- tion. The Huntington Beach Company will bear the cost of the landscaping and the irrigation system within the median which, based on preliminary plans, is estimated to cost in excess of $30,000.00. It is estimated that the cost of the median improvements excluding the landscaping and irrigation will amount to a total of $48,000 which is to be shared equally by the City and the Huntington Beach Company. The extra cost to Huntington Beach Company to share in the construction of the median and to install landscaping amounts to approximately $39,000 as opposed to a savings to them of approximately $28,000 (estimate of cost of extra street improvements in absence of City project). Honorable Mayor and City Council October 16, 1968 Page 2 The purpose of this letter is to make the Council aware of the proposal to beautify Goldenwest Street and to request the permission to allow this department to continue to negotiate for the final agreement with the Huntington Beach Company based on the foregoing information. The entire cost of the City share of the project is eligible for financing from the State gas tax funds. It is suggested that the Council authorize the City Administrator and/or the Director of Public Works to execute the final. agreement on behalf of the City. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:HEH:ae `'�a E1 NT OF ' E �: ACTION OF CGUN 1' 03 a � Coun. i Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beacb , California Monday, SeRtember 16, 1968 Fjayor Coen called the- regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 4:30 o `clock P..M. Councilmen Present: a lev„ FArtlett McCracken. ufman, Rias�ne�r Greco Councilmen Absent : men WIDEN NOV OF EDINGER AVENUE AT S .P.R.R. - APPROVED The Clark presented a trensmi.ttal from the Director of ;I?ubli.c Uorks of rcadway and storm drain easements neceosary for tha widening; of Edinger Avenue at S.P.R,R, , together with a requaGt to purchase a atripp of land across their non-operating property for an amount of $2,492,00, for the purpose of providing a stroet right-of-gray within their 30 foot iuide track easement On motion by Matney, Council accepted roadway and storm drain easements in connection with the Edinger Avenue widening, and directed the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same; and further directed the City Clerk to record the easement with the Orange County Recorder. Motion carried. On motion by Green, Council authorized payment to Southern Pacific Company in the sum of $2,492.00 from State Gas Tax Funds for the purpose of purchasing a strip of land across their non-operating property for widening of Edinger Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, McCracken, Kaufman,Hatney, NOES: Councilmen: None Green, Coen On motion by Kaufman the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned. Motion carried. Paul Ton .s City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: Alvin M. Coen Path C _TnnA4 Mayor City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss : City of Huntington Beach ) I , PAUL C. JONES , the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing . is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 16t-h day of e2tember WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this theay of gentemher Paul C_ Tnn .s City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach., California BY- Deputy t . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California June 8, 1967 J Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller City Adminitrator Subject: Warner Av Improve s Ross Lane t 1 s rly CC-071 .H F.P. No. 35 Gentlemen: Transmitt d herewith are p ans nd sp ci ti s, t e resolu- tion adopting age scale No ce In iting Sea d ds, d five (5) copies of a ri ht of way ificati fo the u 'ect oject. This proj ct will f anced wit ange ounty .H.F.P. f ds and State gas ax funds. t is rec mmended t at yo r Honorable B dy appr ve the p ns d s cificat'ons, adop t o esolution, i struct t o Clerk o ave t e Notice inviting aled Bids publi hed upon otific ion from t 's offic , and auth rite the Mayor to execut all co ies of the ertific tion, four f wh' ch shoo d be retur ed to is office or tran ittal to th Co nty. Very t ly yours, i a I James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:DWK:ae Trans. I RESOLUTION NO. i583 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON MACH ESTABLISHING THE GENERAL 3 PREVAILING PATE OFMIURLY WAGES FOR EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED FOR THE 4 CONSTRUCTIONS RECONSTRUCTION' SURFACING,, AND IMPROVEMENT OF WARNER AVENUE FROM ROSS LANE TO 1397 FEET EAST OF ROSS LANE, ALL IN THE 6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA. 7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach has conducte 8 a hearing for the purpose of establishing the general prevailing rate of 9 hourly wages in this locality for workmen needed in the construction, re- 10 construction, surfacing, and improvement of Warner Avenue from Ross Land 11 to 1397 feet east of Ross Lane, all in the city of Huntington Beach, Cali- 12 fornial and has considered evidence presented. 13 NOW9 T=MREj BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the city of 14 Huntington Beach does hereby find, established and determine that the 15 general -prevailing rate of hourly wages in this locality for workmen needed 16 in the construction, reconstruction, surfacing, and improvement of Warner 17 Avenue from Ross Lane to 1397 feet east of Rose Lane, all in the city of 18 Huntington Beach, California, and the general prevailing rate of legal 19 holiday and overtime work, is as follows: 20 HOURLY WAGE TRADE OR OCCUPATION RATE 21 CARPENTERS 22 Health & Welfare - 260 per hour 23 Pension Plan - 300 per hour 24 Vacation - 150 per hour 25 Carpenter 3.5-09 26 CEMENT MASONS 27 Health & Welfare - 250 per hour 28 Pension Plan - 300 per hour 29 Vacation - 250 per hour 30 Cement Mason - Journeyman 4.84 Resolution no. BDURLY VAS OPERATING ENGINEERS RATE 2 Health & Welfare - 30o per hour Pension Plan - 300 per hour 4 Vacation - 300 per hour 5 CLASSIFIC&TION 6 7 Group 1 $4.36 Group 2 4.62 8 9 Group 3 4.86 Group 4 4.97 10 gaup 5 5*16 12 Group 6 5.P-6 IM N WORKERS 13 14 Health & Welfare - 280 par hour 15 Pension Plan - 200 per hour 16 Vacation - 180 per hour 17 Reinforcing Ironworker 5.54 18 Fence Ereotor 19 1ABDKERS 20 Health & Welfare - 21* per hour 21 Pension Plan - 270 perhour 22 Vacation - �o per hour 23 Laborer ,- General or Construction 3.85 24 Dry Packing bf Concrete 3.8.5 25 Operator of pneumatic & electric tools, vibrating machines & similar mechanical 26 tools not separately classified herein 4.06 27 Asphalt Raker & Ironer 4.06 28 Asphalt Shoveler 3.95 29 cutting Torch Operator (Demolition) 3-90 30 , -2-- SD WAGE 2 TRADE OR OCCUPATION PATE 3 Fine ,graders highway & street paving, 4 airports$ ruavays & similar type heavy tonstructiou $3.95 5 Platen 3.85 6 Guinea Chaser 3*93 7 Laying of sLU non-metallic pipe# 8 including sewer pipe, drain pipe & underground the 4-.16 9 Concrete saw mant excluding tractor type, 4.06 10 Makin g & caulking Of all non-Motallic 11 pipe joint$ 4.04 12 TFAMTJM 13 Health & Welfare - 3� per hour!.-. 14 Pension Plan - 200 per hour 15 Vacation 250 per hour 16 Drive of Dump Truck of loss tbaw 17 4 yda water level 4.50 18 4 yda, but love than 8 y(16, water level 4.53 19 yda,, but less tbAm 12 ydev, water level 4058 20 12 yda, but less tbau 16 yde. water level 4.66 21 16 yda. but less then ?-,5 yda. eater level 4.88 22 ?,5 yde. or more water level 5-34 23 Driver of Truck Legal Payload Capacity 24 Loss than 6 tons 4.5o 25 6 tons to 10 tons JN53 26 10 tons to 15 tons 4.58 27 15 tons to 20 tons 4.66 28 20 tons or more 4.88 29 301 Resolution No. HOURLY WAGE 2 TRAD9 OR OCCUPATION RATS 3 Driver of trawit mix trucks 4 3 Y- den or more $4.88 5 Driver of Road Oil Spreader Truck 4.68 6 Bootman 4.68 7 Water or tank-type truck driver 8 .500 am gala. to 4000 gels. 4.68 9 Truck Greaser 8c Tireman 4,.83 10 Truck repairm= 5.465 11 Truck reIA- irman helper 4.735 12 DW 10 and DW P-0 Euclid-type equipment LeTourneau Pulls, Terra Cobras and 13 similar types of equipment; also PR 14 and similar tjo ti-ocks when performing work within the Teamster jurisdiction, 15 regardless of types of attachments 5.465 16 17 aAZ?BNTM3 - Double time for all overtime. 18 CEMT MASONS - Time and one-half for the first three hours after the 19 regularly conslLituted straight time shift, and all n.ther overtime shall 20 be double time. 21 OPERATING MG'LNLTM, - First three hours outside the regularly. constituted 22 shift shall be at the rate of time and one-half, All additional hours 23 shall be at dable-time. On Saturday work, the first eleven hours shall 24 be at time and one-half and all additional hours at double time. Bundays 25 shall be dorible time. 26 IRON WOMMS - Double time shall be paid for any and all work in excess 27 of eight (8) hours on any regular work day and for all time worked on 28 Saturdays* Sundays and recogaized holidays. 29 -4- 30 r Resolution No. 2583 1 2 CVERT114E RATES Cow d. 3LU30REM - Time and one-half, excerpt Sundays and holidays* which are 4 double time. 5 TEAMSTERS - Time and one-half, except Sundays and holidays, which are 6 double Ume. 7 The rate of compensation for any classification not listed in the 8 schedule, but which may be required to execute the ,proposed contracts 9 shall be: commensurate and in accord with the z*tes specified for similar 10 or comparable duties in they Southern California Masten* Labor Agreements. 11 The rates per hour, indicated al)ove are based upon the local pro- 12 13 vailing rates per day being eight (8) times the above scheduled rats 14 per hour. Hoairly rates of pay are based upon eight (8) hours per day for a full day or a fractional part of a day. The per diem wages of a. 15 16 fractional part of a day shall be the applicable per hour multiplie d 17 said by the =nber of hours worked on id day other than for overtime and,/or i 18 Sundays or loco l Holidays. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the clay of Huntington Ileac , 19 20 California at a regular &4#oerne4 meeting thereof held on, the 19* day of 21 Junea, 1967» 22 23 Donald D. Shipley 2 4 Mayor 25 ATTEST: 26 27 Paul G. Jones 28 City Clerk 29 30 Res. No. 2583 1 � . 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss : 3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 4 I , PAUL C. JONES , the duly elected. qualified and 5 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- 6 officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby 7 certify that the whole number of members of the City Council 8 of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing 9 resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of 10 more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 11 at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th 12 day of June , 19 67 , by the following vote : 13 14 AYES: Councilmen: 15 Coen, Bartlett, Gisler, Kaufman, Green, Shipley 16 NOES: Councilmen: 17 None 18 ABSENT: Councilmen: 19 Stewart 20 21 Paul Co Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 22 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California 23 24 25 I 26 27 I 28 29 30 2 A 9MOXAMON OF TO CITr MMIL OP M CM 3 or RV*rMTUN BUCK M GxNa" MVAI LIM, RAW 0r.*,HDUM WAQZS MR MCH UVJV 4 OR TVs OF WORKW OR MWAMIC MM FOR Ta OONMUMON9 WORSTRUGMNs SMWACINGI "D 5 IMPROMM or WAR= AVMZ :MIS ROSS UM TO 1397 VEST UST Or WSS 1AIMs AM 10 TIM 6 CITY OF RMITINTUR BEACR# CALMMEA* 7 WMWrAS the city co=cil of the City of jl=tinstoz Beach Us eanduete I 8 a hearing for the purpose of WAUishing the, gmas"I prevailing rate of 9 hourly wages in this looality for vortmen noWed in the aonstructiont 10 omstruation# w4rfaoing, anct improvowent of Warner Avenuo from Roos Lane 11 to 1397 reet east of Roos Lane, all in the City of Runtinston Beath, Cali- 12 fornias and has zonsidered evidence prezante4 13 NOW9 TH lam MRRo SX IT MOLVED, that the City Council 0 tho oity of 14 Huntington Beath does horeUy find, established and detorsiue that the 15 genovvl prevailing rate of hourly wagea In this locality for wo*wa needed 16 In the cowtructioAt r000nstruction, surfacing,, and improvement ef Warner 17 Avenue from Ross Lano to 13W fe*t easj. of Does Lane, P-U In the eity of 18 H=Uagtoa boach, California, and the Sameml prevailing rate of lepi 19 holiday and overtime work* is as Wlowss 20 TUDS 01 OMOPATIOIN HOMY ATS--- 21 22 Health & Welfare - 26o per hour 23 Pension Plan - 300 per hour 24 Vaeation - 15o per hour 25 Carpentor 26 27 Health & Wolfare - 250 per hour 28 Pension PUA - 300 per hour 29 Vacation - 250 per hour 30 , Cement PAson - Journeyman 4.84 Z 3 4 30 my"Wer 5 6 SOUP 8 Ono.' 9 droop �- 10 11 �, 4"^ 12 13 14 zo Wo bout 15 16 17 Own Unt-14or 18 19 20 21 f. .... 22 j: I AMOCO 23 24 25 A :.- all` 26 27 2, 02 0a 3 YUw , 4 toov WANT 6 7 ' $ � � . ; ',vo 9r - rfi' 10 wk u .o 12 13 14 15 16 17 � '. ?T 'hat loos,os, � v dw* _FI o 0,V 18 vol, . ' 2 V dk 4° 21 22 23 24 25 26 :. . OAS 27 " *. 2`8 * 29 30 2 , 3 W � 6 4 �► 5 . 6 7 W- 4r W*O 8 to 4m . 9 *V4 Meoaswx, , 10 °; . A * 13 twur . :;: . � '440 , . 14 uo* vA M t r , - o of 15 16 Umt%# tuo for oa " 17 .*�.. - , .. _ l .l for tho Aftt 18 19 o 2 0y a y 21 oblUt . '�t ot _ 0*04wallo 1. 22 .t A; l the O"t slovoa ' . .. 23 "tiot MA4 24 awl bo .-vu ,U: 25 `; W. - _ ta o V44 for - ** .- - 26 27 28 29 30 238 2' Ounixt m - cobt& 3 - Tiae and one-halts except Swdayeand tmlidaya, wbi& are 4 doublo 1 ,. 5 a . Timt so-half. exa-Apt Zun4ays oad, hojidaY84 whiob 6 doahle time. 7 The r �4 e Of OftPezestion tar any 'OubsifieAtion not :44ted IA th 8 mch�-dales but vibi h iway be required to exeouto the proposed 6ehtraott 9 aball tm comenvunatoaad in 440or-d nth the as "p.0,4 fi for, S10alar 10 r compar blf,, r1citilev in tba &o a rn (1alifortia. Master, Labor ASretconts, 11 The rate rateg per hour, indicated awe are wed upon the Iowa pro- 12 r t , pat- day. bang eight { times the Abovt schodu144rake 13 ` per hour. Uwarly rates of pair Aro amazed upon: e (a) lwurs per 14 w a lain". jda Orr a ,rractiqnal Twit or a sado, Tho per diem wages of a 15 16 by t r o €curs wor . n Ala the r.> t for Overtime axtd/dr 17 Su nftye or Lem Holidays. 18 19 PASUD AND ADOPTby the City Council of the c1ty of RmtingWo CmUZ*zm a a regal.. r umwd meating thereof hold on the day p 20 June, 21 22 23 Donald D. Shipley 24 �. 25 ATTEITs 26 27 Paul C. .Jones 28 City Ciao Ciao i S r Res. No. 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss : 3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 4 I , PAUL C. JONES , the duly elected; qualified and 5 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- 6 officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby 7 certify that the whole number of members of the City Council 8 of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing 9 resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of i 10 more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 11 at a regular meeting thereof held on the i 12 day of r , 10 , by the following vote : I 13 14 AYES: Councilmen: 16 NOES: Councilmen: I. 17 Neine 18 ABSENT: Councilmen: 19 20 21 Paul C. Jove , City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 22 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 I O RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION The City of Huntington Beach hereby certifies in connection with the right of way for Project A.H.F.P. No. 335 that: 1. All right of way has been acquired, or all work is within existing right of way and no additional right of way is necessary. . 2. No building improvement or utility exist within the right of way area that will interfere with construction. In making this certification, the City of Huntington Beach agrees to hold the County harmless from any lability which may arise by reason of the County's reliance upon this Certificate and its use of said rights of way. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I By Mayor ATTEST: r --'City Clerk DATE:--- r I i n The amity of n=tington Beath heroby certifies in ry 'lwith tbo A&t of, v.Ay for Project No. 3X u: 1. All ri t of aog4r d l or 4lll ,vork within exiating riShtofwayandno Z. No buildin provomftt or Ott- ' mat t o the righto � that 41i interfere with o*natruotioz, In wing tl4s c*rtinaaatious the i f Umt ,hoau Death agrees �o told tee bounty doss from aV Ubility w ,, h ay arise 1>y reasono.r the CovAty4s reUanco g am Cortificate and its use ofald r1l#As of way. 11TY OF WTINMN SUCH ATMTl r- ��4 i Cc INSrp,�® CITE' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o " = ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California C ��isa9+ k �CDUNTY May 8, 1968 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ___ .® 9 19--- Honorable Mayor -----.___ ...---------— and City Council C'TY CLERK City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Subject: Section 2156 City Street Deficiency Study Gentlemen: Section 2156 of the California Streets and Highways Code requires each city and county to prepare a report every four years setting forth the following: 1. The progress the City has made in the construction or - improvement of its street system; 2. An estimate of its street needs for the next five years; 3. A 'projected estimate of its road or street needs for the next ten years. This report has been completed by the Department of Public Works. We are herein requesting that your Honorable Body approve by minute, action the transmittal of this report to the State. Please direct the Clerk to return two certified copies of the Council minutes to this office for transmittal with the report to the State. i Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:PEC:ae I t HUNTINGTON COAST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION POST OFFICE BOX 682 HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 92648 November 2 , 1967 ae&4zaf-, bAO -&wll,x Honorable Mayor and City Council ---------------------- City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 NOV 2 9-1967----- Huntington Beach, California, 92648 .- Gentlemen: The members of our Association have expressed concern over the fact that , apparently, Magnolia Street immediately contiguous to the Edison Company right-of-way is not being widened and paved. It is the feeling of our membership that the widening work on Magnolia Street in front of . Edison High School should be. . continued up to the intersection of Magnolia and Hamilton. We feel that if the . full width of Magnolia is not maintained, it will create a traffic hazard and will impede traffic in that intersection. We would like to have an expression from you as to whether the City. intends to pave that portion of Magnolia contiguous to the Edison Company right-of-way, and if the present plans do not call for paving now, we would like to know why the paving will not be done 'in conjunction with the road widening work now under way. Yours very truly, i WILLIAM K. OLSON PRESIDENT A/aw**3 T eaicaled to a more beauli f ul'cily" l MEMORANDUM TO: Doyle Miller, City Administrator . FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: November 13, 1967 SUBJECT: Letter from Huntington Coast Homeowners Assoc. Reference is made to a letter dated November 2, 1967 from Huntington Coast Homeowners Association expressing concern over the fact that Magnolia Street immediately contiguous to the Edison Company right of way is not being improved. The Edison High School is under construction on the east Aide of Magnolia Street from 230, north to 2032 ' north of Hamilton Avenue. In conjunction with their construction the east one-half of Magnolia Street including curb and gutter is being improved. The 230' strip across the Edison right of way immediately north of Hamilton Avenue is not being improved at this time. When the traffic warrants are such that improvements are necessary the City may pro- ceed with this %D rk using Gas Tax Funds. s Ir. Ze;!LVr ireotor of Public Works JRW:HEH:ae / 03 ING CITE''OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California ��puHrr c� April 13, 1967 FAPiPROVED By CITY COUNCIL . _ d -_ _,19.._ Honorable Mayor _CITY ;'1-'"RK and City Council A �- City of Huntington Beach .c� `a 2J Attention: Mr. Doyle Miller City Administration Subject: Improvement of Pacific Coast Hwy. from Beach Blvd. to 1.0 mile North of 23rd St. Gentlemen: I - The Division of Highways plans to widen and improve Pacific Coast Highway from Beach Boulevard to 1.0 mile north of 23rd Street. The work will include a raised median which will prevent traffic on certain city streets from crossing the State highway. Exhibit A showing the locations of the median openings is attached. Since this change from the present condition will effect some property owners in the City, the State has requested that a resolution from the City Council concur- ring and approving the proposed improvements be passed. Accordingly, Resolution No. 255;� is transmitted herewith for your convenience. I Very truly yours, �. ames R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:HEH:ae Trans. i �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK o�v�atoac�ro�®F CITY OF HUNTINGTON ]BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o = Huntington Beach, California �'DUNTY r'� April 10, 1967 a r 1 t= i Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Subject: Edinger Ave. Improvements Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are the improvement plans for Edinger Avenue from approximately 2000 feet west of Bolsa Chica Street to the proposed Orange County Aquatic Park. Since this is a County project, City Council action has been requested. The plans have been reviewed by this office and it is recommended that your Honorable Body give your approval. Very truly yours; i i C2.es R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:JI9l:ae i Trans. I I 1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 2 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 June 14 , 1967 4 On motion of Supervisor Allen , duly seconded and carried, the 5 following Resolution was adopted: 6 BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman of this Board be and he is hereby 7 authorized to execute that certain Agreement, dated June 14, 1967 , be- 8 tween the Orange County Harbor District and the Huntington Harbour 9 Corporation, for the improvement of Edinger Avenue from Monterey Street 10 westerly to the Rancho line, within the City of Huntington Beach, and 11 the Clerk of this Board be and he is hereby directed to attest the same . 12 fi 13 AYES: SUPERVISORS ALTON E . ALLEN, C . M. FEATHERLY, WILLIAM J . PHILLIPS , WM. HIRSTEIN AND DAVID L. BAKER 14 z NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE onn 15 NU° ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE Elm 16 J E. oZ 00 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss . 18 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 19 I , W. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board 20 pf Supervisors of Orange County, California , hereby certify that the 21 above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the 22 said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of June, 23 1967 , and passed by a unanimous vote of said Board . 24 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th 25 day of June, 1967 . 26 W. E . ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of 27 the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California 28 29 c� BY 30 Deputy 31 Resolution No . 67-625 , r 32 Agmt . between Or . Co . Harbor Dist . & Huntington Harbour Corp . - JSO:mds Improvement of Edinger ,Ave . F1031-1 V I'• Ij ? jl AuREEMENT ,j `3hz ()range County Harbor District, a harbor improvement district n 411 of the ate of California, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT'', and Ij 5'1 the Eur b_:ington Harbour Corporation, a Delaware 1 corporation', hereinafter referred to as 7 I! `°C0RP0,`,.,T ..0N. `, do hereby eater into the following Agreement regarding 8 ! the ",mprovement ' of Edinger Avenue from Monterey Street westerly to the i ' 9 ! a-ncho J.ine, within the City of Huntington Beeach, hereinafter referred . 10 1i to as City". This Agreement is dated �` � i G/ , 1967 ; 11 for Du,�poses of convenience and reference /ly. li 1211 R E C 1 T A L S 13i 1. DISTRICT plans to develop a facility to be :known as Sunset i Acuatic Regional Park in the unincorporated area northwesterly of 15 lands owned by the CORPOUT -TION. 0 it `: 1I 2 . The DISTRICT plans to construct a 24-foot wide section of the G 171i funs?"c: arterial highway along an extension of Edinger Avenue from the present end of the pavement at Monterey Street westerly to the city 19 limits at the line separating Rancho Los Ala-nitos from Rancho i a Eolsa i 2011 Chica; which extension would be entirely within the corporate limits 23 of she C i t 22 �� i . City plans to improve Said westerly extension of Edinger 9 �it `)� �j Avez.4e as shorn on Exhibit A attached hereto.. but intends to delay such it . 24 ij iiflprovC:T:e t until it is in a position to Lmpose the',costs of the southe.-16� 25i�, portion thereof upon the adjacent landowners as a condition of develop- II jl 26 jf <._ent. 2"71 4. CORPORATION owns certain lands adjacent to the future arterial 28jfIhig i��aay and has dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach a rig-ht of wa I! i; L'- J 1 � 0 3' I 29 6 fe..e,t in width to pe mit construction of the 24-foot wide. roadway. So � > CORPORATION has entered into an agreement with another of said l Ij adjace-nt ' andowners , the Ocean View School. District, in which CORPORATION 32 has agreed that the City may look to the C0kPORATION or it.s successors ff I , i I I i 1 for the a.yment of all charges in connection with the improvement of- � p g p 2 access -'roads to said property deeded b CORPORATION to the S P p y y School Dis- 3 ) trict. . _ 4 �1 6. COPPORATION intends to subdivide and develop its lands which i i 5 are adjacent to said extension of Edinger Avenue at some date in the } 61 future, and CORPORATION will be required by the City, .as a condition � 7j1 to the approval of such subdivision, to agree to pay the improvement SI costs for the southerly one-half of said westerly extension of Edinger f 911 Avenue. 19 ,1 TERMS' 11. �� NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for and in consideration of 124 the mutual covenants hereinafter stated and for other good, valuable - . 13 �1 and adequate consideration, do hereby agree as follows ; ' 14I 1, CORPORATION, or its successors or assigns, or any grantee of ,gin 15 the lands or a portion of the lands adjacent to the extension. of Edinger WJ'j � 'd 16I 'Avenue presently under the ownership of the CORPORATION will prior to Z5 171 the recordation of a final tract- map or a similar document which in the E 1ST} future may have substantially the same effect, pay to DISTRICT 90% of i 1.9 } the amounts paid by DISTRICT to the contractor under the contract for 20 ! the improvement of the westerly extension of Edinger Avenue as . shown on , 23. , Exhibit A. 'The aforesaid payments shall be applicable to and payable 22 �t under the following circumstances: I 23 (a) . The 9O% payments shall be allocated on a running foot 5 . , 24 basis to the lands presently owned by CORPORATION and to the property of 251 the Ocean View .School. District. Said adjacent lands upon which the 26 reimbursement condition is hereby imposed are as delineated on Exhibit A. 27 � (b) CORPORATION® s obligation to pay 9O% of the amount paid - 231; by DISTRICT to the contractor shall not apply to design and engineering .. 29 costs , not shall said amount bear interest prior to the ' due date. l i o CORPORATION or its successors- or assigns, or grantees i shall have no obligation to make such. payment except as a condition to- 32 } their development of said adjacent lands and the recordation of their I_ FY S79Y-i i� 2. i i C1 . 1 final tract map or similar document in connection with said development. 21, In the event of a piecemeal development of the adjacent land, the cost allocable to the area of each development shall be paid at the time that 4 such development map is filed. Furthermore, if CORPORATION® s property 51 is sold to more than one buyer, each buyer shall assume only his share 6 of this obligation. 2 . CORPORATION further agrees that should DISTRICT complete said 8 improvement described hereinabove then neither said CORPORATION, nor 9 its successors nor assigns nor its grantees of the aforesaid property 10 or any part thereof, will oppose the imposition by the City of' Huntington 11 Beach of a condition to the approval of a final tract map, or a document 12 having similar effect, involving all or any portion of the above described real property, which condition requires the aforesaid reim 14 bursement shall be paid to DISTRICT prior to the recordation of the final. ZZ Unn 1 tract .map, or a document having similar effect . E, i -16 3 . CORPORATION further agrees that should DISTRICT complete said Zz 17 improvement described hereinabove then CORPORATION will, prior to any 18 transfer of the above described real property or any part thereof, 19 require its grantee thereof to agree to assume and be bound by the 201 obligations of this Agreement. 211 DISTRICT will advertise the road improvement project for public 221 bid and CORPORATION will be furnished with a copy of all construction 23 bids . Upon completion of the contract, the DISTRICT will furnish to 24 the CORPORATION a copy of final quantities paid to the contractor and 2 also a statement for the 90% reimbursement. 26 IN WITNESS IATHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agree- - 271 ment on the date set forth hereinbelow opposite their respective 281 signatures. 29 MAY 2 1967 P Date : HAU,NT ON HA OU OR ON (j Bx -pre—siden r 3 . By *-Secretary 33.5 3 . I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. 2 COUNTY CF ORANGE 3 On before me, the undersigned, a 4 Notary Pdblic in and for said County and State, personally appeared 51 known to me to be the 61 President , and kno,,,7n to me to be 7 the Secretary of the Corporation that executed the 8 within instrument , and known to me to be the persons who executed the 9 within instrument on behalf of the Corporation therein named, and 10 acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the within instrument 11 pursuant to its by-laws or a 'resolution of its Board of Directors . 12 I WITNESS my hand and official seal. J 14 Notary Public in an for said county 151 and State. 161 ozi 17 Date: ORANGE COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT 13 , 19 ' By Afa 1z Chairman b its Boar '6f Super- 20 visors 21 1 ATTEST., I W, E. ST JOHN 221 County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of 21 Orange Coulfity, California 24 25 , By l %26 Depetity ----27 28 29 30 31 32 4. �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK INGTp�® V • C�•b ~ V CITY OF HUNT INGT ON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ' Huntington Beach, California ��®uNTy c� December 13, 1966 APPROVED i3Y C-. r c u IL E--C._.1-9__1966--- 19------- CITY CLERI{ Honorable Mayor r and City Council ` City of Huntington Beach Attention: Mr. Doyle Miller Subject*. - Warner Improvements CC 040 Gentlemen*. The work on the subject contract has been completed i by Yoder and Sons for a final contract amount of $84, 171060 It is recommended that your Honorable Body accept j the work and instruct the Clerk to file the notice of completion. Very truly yours , James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works H,:- E, Hart Deputy Director of Public Works JRWoDWK:mp i r . i i ��VNTINGTp,y® CITE' OF HUNTINGTON ]BEACH o " = ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 0 Huntington Beach, California C � �C�UNTY CP\' APPROVED BY (:I1'Y August 10, 1g66 co UN AUG Doyle Miller I ciEr City Administrator City of Huntington Beach Subject: Warne:9, JoloChica, inger Improvement Q Dear Mr. Miller: Transmitted, herewith is a final progress estimate and EJeque r acceptance of the work on the subject contract from Noble mpany. The work has been completed to our satis- faction and the project summary is as follows: FINAL PROGRESS ESTIMATE - DATED AUGUST 10, 1966 Total amount earned $$161058,13 Retention (10%) 16,135.81 Amount paid or payable 145,222.32 Total amount previously paid 115048,86 Amount due under this estimate $ 30,073.46 Total contract bid price $$145s287o74 It is recommended that the request be approved, the Clerk be instructed to file the notice of completion, and the Finance Department be instructed to prepare a check .in the amount of $30,073.46 to be returned to this office for transmittal, and prepare a check in the amount of $$16,135.81 after the expiration of the normal 35 days. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:HEH:mp Trans. cc: City Council Finance Director I /0 3 i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o " g ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California ��ouarr c� August 10, 1966I APPROVED BY CITY CO'UNCI L ' PG 15 in Doyle Miller City Administrator CITY CLE$g City of Huntington Beach Subject: Slurry Seal of Acacia Avenue, Huntington Avenue, Geneva Street.- Magnolia Avenue CC o42 Dear Mr. Miller: Transmitted, herewith is a final progress estimate and request for acceptance of the work on the subject contract from V. R. Dennis Construction Company, The work has been completed to our satisfaction and the project summary is as follows: FINAL PROGRESS ESTIMATE - DATED AUGUST 10, 1966 Total amount earned $49171.22 Retention (100) 417.12 � ` Amount paid or payable -------- Total amount previously paid -------- Amount due under this estimate $3,754.10 Total contract bid price $39848.98 It is recommended that the request be approved, the Clerk be instructed to file the notice of completion, and the Financ Department be ins e o prepare a c eck in the amount of $3,754.10 to be returned to this office for transmittal, and pre- paJre a check in the amount of $417.12 after the expiration of the normal 35 days. Very truly yours, I I ames R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:WSL:mp Trans. 1 cc: City Council Finance Director , i I ENGINEERING cl�o GENEggEcoy SUB-DIVISIONS • HIGHWAYS �tPORTS �. C01TRACTORS GRADING SEWERS WATER LINES STD_.. A DRAINS CURBS WALKS PAVING sa Al o OF AME�GP. OFFICE MAIL ADDRESS 7000 MISSION GORGE ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CALIF. P.O. BOX 20,068 i PHONE AREA CODE 714 583-7611 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120 Engineering Dept. July 13, 1966 City of Huntington Beach Project CC"Q42 P.Q. .Box 190 66-112 j Huntington Beach, California 92648 1 I Apply Slurry Seal on Streets as per plans and specification for Project CC-042, work completed July 8, 1.966 I i 241.67 tons.Slurry Seal, $17.26/ton $4,171.22 Leas 10% Retention e...4117.12 i j f (f I. f r: P.O. VOX 763 HUNTINGTON BEACHS CALIFORNIA 92646 25 AUGUST 1966 C.I TY COUNCIL DENT "" P.O. BflX 190 SEPY fi COUNCIL �9fifi HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA 9264.6 ......................._........................... �� -•............................. ...... GENTLEMEN: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SURFSIDE ASSOCIATION No. 1 HAVE - i UNANIMOUSLY VOTED TO RE;Q. T THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO ACCEPT OEDICATIfl�NF ALL UNDEDICATED STREETS IN THE TRACT KNOWN AS TRACT 55819 ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,, COUNTY OF ORANGEy STATE f) CAL I RN IA. THIS REQUEST IS BEING MADE IN ORDER TO GIVE RESIDENTS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AT SURFSIDE FULL USE OF CITY FACILITIES$ PARTICULARLY POLICE PROTECTION, OUR .STREETS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS USED GENERALLY ONLY BY RESIDENTS9 THEIR GUEST AND TRADESMEN AND ARE APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR OLD, IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ACCEPTED STREETS DEDICATED BY HUNTINGTON CONTINENTAL UNITS ONE AND Two, ON JULY 21 ,, 1965. USING THIS AS A PRECEDENT WE WOULD APPRECIATE CITY COUNCILS ATTENTION TO THIS I SIMILAR REQUEST. YOURS VERY TRULY, i BEVERLY ALB INGER, 1ST VIC PRESIDENT HARTWIG M AN NOORDEN� ' ARCH i TECTU�CtAL COMMITTEE CHA IRURN I 1Q3 INGRAii ro�, CITY OF - ---- y -o Q CALIFORNIA yC e'?isoeP• \�O NTY GPI July 14, 1966 ODjoyle Miller City Administrator D City of Huntington Beach R � Subject: Warner-Yorktown-Indianapolis Improvements CC032 Dear Mr. Miller: Transmitted, herewith, is a request for payment, to C. E. Hurley Contracting Corporation, of progress payment No. 4 on their subject contract with the City of Huntington Beach. The project summary is as follows: MONTHLY PROGRESS ESTIMATE NO. 4 FOR PERIOD ENDING 7-14-66 Total amount earned $55,103.94 Retention (10%) 5,510.39 Amount paid or payable 49,593.55 Total amount previously paid 36,920.27 Amount due-under this estimate 13,573.28 'total contract bid price $55,639.92 It is recommended that the request be approved and the Finance Department be instructed to prepare a check in the amount of $13,573.28 to be returned to this office for transmittal. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRWsDWK:am Trans. cc: 'City Council Finance Director i INcrOry� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o _ " g ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California �CUUNTY �\ July 27, 1966 APPROVLD BY CITY COUNCIL Hono rab 1 e Mayor ____ .11 and City Council ---19--_-- . City of Huntington Beach _ CdTY CLERK-____• Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Subject: Warner — Indianapolis Yorktowh Improvements CC 032 Gentlemen: Transmitted, herewith is a final progress estimate and request for acceptance of the work on the subject contract from C. E. Hurley Contracting Corporation. The work has been completed j to our satisfaction and the project summary is as follows: FINAL PROGRESS ESTIMATE — DATE JULY 27, 1966 Total amount earned , .$55,262.24 Retention(10%) . . 5,526.22 Amount paid or payable. . 49,736.02 Total amount previously paid. . . . . . . . . . . 49,593.55 Amount due under this estimate. , 142.47 Total contract bid price $55,639.92 ! Total contract change order (to date) —377.68 Total contract price (to date) $55,262.24 j It is recommended that your Honorable Body accept the work, instruct the Clerk to file the notice_of comRleti.on i`nst�ructthe _ --d: - = Finance Department to prepare a check in-the amount of $142..47 to be returned to this office for transmittal, and instruct the Finance Department to prepare a check in the amount of $5,526.22 after the expiration of the normal 35 days. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works I JRW:IAVK:mp trans. i �a.3 o�p�tlN - �` ` qy CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California c��'oUNTY CQy� July 27, 1966 FROVED BY CITY COUNCIL G 11966 -_.._......._..----- --e CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator. Subject: Main Street from 450 feet Southwesterly of Delaware Street to Beach Boulevard CC 035 Gentlemen: iTransmitted., herewith, is a final invoice and request for � ._ .acceptance of the subject project from C. E. Hurley Contracting Corporation. The work has been completed to our satisfaction and the project summary is as follows: FINAL PROGRESS ESTIMATE.— DATE JULY 27,, 1966- Total amount earned. . . . . .$892096.96 Retention (10%).. . , . . . . . 8,909.70 Amount paid or payable. . . . . . . . 80,187.26 Total amount previously paid . 809290.05 Amount due under this estimate . --------- Total contract bid price $86,457.88 Total contract change order (to date) 2,639.08 Total contract price (to date) $89,096.96 It is recommended that your Honorable Body accept the work, instruct the Clerk to file notice of._compl.eti�on, n ins truct the Finance Diep "r`tment to prepare a check int the amount of $8,806.91 after the expiration of the normal 35 days. Xlery truly yours, Jmes R. Wheeler ✓' Director .of Public Works JRW:DWK:mp trans.. !� AU MEWRANDUM TO: Doyle Miller FROM: James R. Wheeler DATE: March 24, 1966 RE: Heil Avenue Beautification This may provide a solution that will be acceptable to the how owners on Heil between Trudy and Torjian Lane and set up a workable precedent for City-home owner cooperative projects. 1. Where no cooperative project occurs we will continue to plant trees on approximate 100 foot centers. 2. Where a cooperative project occurs we can reduce tree spacing. The city will furnish trees in a number based on standard spacing; the participating homeowners will finance the excess over and above the City contribution. The cost to the homeowners, at this time, is $22.25 per tree. Additional planting may be done by the home owner on a permit basis. Said permit will allow them to enter upon the public right of way to plant between the trees, shrubbery or whatever they like,_ in accordance with a plan approved by the Department of Public Works. Iftintennnce of all of the trees only would-be performed by the City. Maintenance of the permit planting would be the obligation of the permi.ttee. The permit would stipulate that if maintenance was not performed by the per it- tee that after notice the city would do the work and .-bill the perpittee on a cost, plus overhead basis. For Heil Avenue this plan would result_ in .an. approximate• 60 'foot tree spacing, trees could be set' at or{ nearly at lot. lises-, resulting in permit planting directly in front of each home. James R. Yhee r Director of Public Works 0 JRW:am HURTIOGTOR BUCH URIOR HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL • MARINA HIGH SCHOOL • •WESTMINSTER HIGH SCHOOL 1 9 02 SEVENTEENTH STREET • HUNTINGTON B E A C H C A L I F O R N I A TELEPHONE 5 3 6 - 9 33 1 MAX L. FORNEY. ED.D. BOARD OF TRUSTEES DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT JOHN J. BENTLEY ' EDWIN W. ANDERSON ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT ADRIAN O. HUBBELL, O.D.S. BUSINESS SERVICES JOSEPH E. RIBAL, PH.D. SCOTT E. FLANAGAN , RAY M. SCHMITT ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT R.D. SCHWERDTFEGER EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL March 9, 1966 i HHA City Council City. of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 MAR Huntington Beach, California ------ Attention �y , Attention Mr. Paul Jones, City Clerk Gentlemen: The Board of Trustees of the Huntington Beach Union High School District at regular meeting Tuesday, March 8, 1966, considered the recommendation of the City Council urging that all school districts comply with the j city beautification program. 4 The Board concurs with the City Council that the beautification of the j city is of paramount importance. The Board did however take exception 4 to one of the specific requirements which involves the construction �. of screen walls. The position of the Board is that screen walls are often bleak and cold, and further that they are costly - often beyond the extent of funds. available for a particular project, The Board further feels that the desired screening, effect can be accomplished in a more aesthetic fashion by appropriate planting. It has been the--practice of the .High School District to provide such landscaping at the existing schools. f In general, the Board concurs with the other requirements of the program and indicates intent to comply within the extent of funds available. It should be stated that should the District become a participant in the State Building Loan program the provision of the improvements would be possible only to the extent permitted within the State program. Very truly yours, Edwin W. Anderson Assistant Superintendent - Business Services March 23, 1966 Edwin W. Anderson, Assistant Superintendent Huntington Beach Union High School District 1902 Seventeenth Street Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Anderson: Thank you for your recent letter dated March 9, 1966, which was presented to the City Council at its regular meeting held March 21, 1966. Consideration to your suggestions have been noted by the Council and your letter has been ordered filed for LJ future reference. Sincerely yours, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk PCJ:jh Q3 T No. 2332 INGTp,y . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o " ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT G+ iyi5a9 •��@ Huntington Beach, CaliforniaNMV " i n March 3, 1966 0 APPROVTD PY CITY CO I°1 IL '719�6 Honorable Mayor MAR------ - -~------- --- and City Council _ Cityofunn - - Huntington Beach g -------'-� ..---CITY CLERK Attention: Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator Gentlemen: The enclosed resolution and budget proposal are submitted for your approval in order to obtain Section 2107 Gas Tax Financing for the widening of Bolsa Chica Street, Warner Avenue and Edinger Avenue, and for the construction of traffic signals at Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue, and Bolsa Chica Street and Edinger Avenue. Very truly yours, ode James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:PEC:am Encl. December 20, 1965 Huntington Beach City Council Dear Sirs: As President of the McFadden Homeowners ,Association-,of Huntington Beach., I hereby respectfully request the City of Huntington Beach to grant permission for the McFadden Homeowners Association to landscape the parkways in our area. Specifically: (1) McFadden .Avenue, between Springdale and Edwards, and (2) Edwards ,Avenue, between Bolsa and Edinger. The Ass6ciation has waited for over three years for this to be ac- complished. We have written letters in the past on this subject, but to no avail. Representatives from our Association have been told that we may have to wait until 1967 or later. Gentlemen, we do not find this timetable to be acceptable. We do not feel that our request is so terribly demanding that it should take this long to accomplish. The Association wishes in every way possible to cooperate in this project.. If you wish us to supply physical support, we will gladly do so. If there.is a financial problem, the Association will gladly assist by purchasing the trees. Just let us know. We would like to have the parkways concreted with spaces left open for trees, but it is our understanding that this procedure is felt to be too expensive; so as our second choice, we would like to have a ground cover planted between the trees, to be maintained by the City. 1 If you feel that the City cannot afford the ground cover, we would be pleased to receive permission to purchase and plant ground covering according to your requirements. If necessary, we will even be willing to provide the maintenance, according to your requirements. We are anxiously awaiting your reply. Respectfully Mrs. Charles L. Stone, President McFadden Homeowners Association 15452 la Salle Lane Huntington Beach, California 897-7588 cc I � December 21, 1965 Mrs. Joyce Stone, President McFadden Homeowners association " 15452 LaSalle Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs. Stone: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at their regular meeting held Monday evening, December 20, 1965, considered the request of your organization .to participate in the dev- elopment and beautification of parkways on Bolsa Chica and McFadden ;streets, as presented by Mr. Stone. The Council were extremely gratified to receive the offer, and expressed a sincere hope that other individuals and organizations will also want to participate in such projects. By minute action, the Council instructed the Director of Public Works to work with your organization in the ful- fillment of the Bolsa Chica and McFadden Street projects, I and to consider any plans you may have for development of the Murdy Park site. If there is any assistance or information which can be provided by my office in connection with the foregoing or any other matters, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones, City Clerk PCJ: I December 27, 1965 rn Mrs, Joyce Stone, President McFadden Homeowners Association 15452 LaSalle Lane Huntington Beach, California Dear Mrs. Stone: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at their regular meeting bald Monday evening, December 20, 1965, 'considered the request of your organization to participate in the development -and beautification of parkways on McFadden Avenue between Goldenwest and Springdale Streets, and on Edwards Street between Edinger and Bolsa Avenues, as requested in your letter. The .Council was extremely gratified to receive the offer, and expressed a sincere hope that other individuals and organiza- tions would also want to participate in such projects. By minute action, the Council instructed the Director of Public Works to cooperate with your organization in the fulfillment of the Edwards Street and McFadden Avenue projects, and to con- sider any plans you may have for sui7h development. If there is any assistance or information which can be provided by my office in connection with the foregoing or any other matters, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely yours, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk PCJ:Jh 0/6 22111 Islander Lane Huntington Beach, California" July 14.,, 1 6 _— s.: Hon.. Donald. Shipirey M1 R,� i�ta.yor, City of Huntington Beach By City Hall 1 9 �g65 Huntington Beach, California ,UL 19........ Dear Dr. Shipley: As. .a spokesman for a number of property owners on.py street (in the nT'ewport West tract); we are greatly'dismayed ata the delay, intentional or otherwise, by certain municipal. agencies in repeated app)eals to have parkway trees planted on our° street (where the city removed trees that were dead). 0 For civic pride, or our general area appearance, the fact that trees have been gone for more than one year would mean 1.) the appear- ance is bare� and not appealing; 2) we have 'lost a yearl's growth; and 3'). the street will ba uneven in tree: growth. Moth of my'immediate neighbors are without tree3s; the house across the street;: and many others nearby. In my own case, I have kept a space avail'able: for the tree that never arrives for nine months. Should I plant my own tree? Or should I continue to await the city? I am addressing this letter to you, sir, as our councilmanic representative and presiding officer of the legislative branch of.' ` our municipal_ government. t Respect ST '01 S, Dr. onald A. Oleson i 6 t E i° E.C.DEN10 (1864-1952) CABLE ADDRESS"DENIO" GEO.A.HART AREA CODE 213 GEO.P.TAUBMAN,JR. TELEPHONE 436-9201 MATTHEW C.SIMPSON ROGER W.YOUNG WARREN H.ECKERT LAW OFFICES „9, �" . GLENN A.HOTTENSTEIN,JR. DENIO, HART, TAUBMAN AND SIMPSON SUITE 514 SECURITY BUILDING 1 110 PINE AVENUE LONG BEACH, 90802 July 6, 1965 i i -City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: This letter concerns the following work: water main project in portions of Alabama Street, Huntington Street and certain connecting alleys, City of Huntington Beach, Contract 'Noo CC 015 F 3-18. The contractor was T. J. Robert Co. , Inc. We represent Sully-Miller Contracting Company a subcontractor, which company. filed a Withhold Notice with you on December 18, 1964. Concerning the subject job, we shall very much appreciate information from your office concerning the following: a) Date of acceptance; b) Date of filing Notice of, Completion, if any; /0 .2 c) The amount of any funds 'of T. J. Robert Co. , Inc. presently .being withheld; and 2iv�5, .z� p d) The approximate amount of withhold notices -00) heretofore filed- with- you. ' You may be aware that Security Insurance Group has offered to my client and others an .amount equal to 69r00% of the ry amount of the claim of each. The total thus determined amounts to the penal sum of the labor and material bond. Before we -are in amposition to advise our client, ' it . is necessary that we know whether or not withheld funds are also available.. We trust this letter is not an imposition upon you. If more convenient, telephone advice will be entirely satisfactory. Thank you for the attention you will be able to give this matter. Very truly yours, DENIO,HART, / BMAN & SIMPSON By �'' Rog r o g RWY: f f July 14, 1965 R - _ Air. Roger W. Young Denio, Hart, Taubman and Simpson Suite 514 Security Building 110 Pine Avenue Long Beach, California 90802 Hear Sir: To supply the information requested by you in your letter of July 6, 1965, please be advised as follows: (a) The work.completed on the contract was accepted by the City Council on October 19, 1964. (b' The Notice of Completion was filed by the City Clerk on October 22, 1964. (c) The City -is presently withholding $9,051.38 from T. J. Robert Co. , Inc. (d) There have been ten withholding notices totaling the sum of $22,455.29 from the T. J. Robert Co. , Inc. (e) We are holding a bond in the amount of $15,616.54 .We trust this information will be of help to you. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:sg OFly ' arvV r 65 1� Z oCIAJO—Z-1--� lillill''rl' ''I'', V V a i I f D D { U F , eds..�.nn,�✓...w...x�xdaa�.m�efwe.M..m_v:_.�e.��...i:.. ,,.a...�..as.,x.....���..,...w_w.-..rr.� n..c.a..r.rm.:s.uab...Axam 'y3`." a July S, 1965 Mr. R. R. (Dick) Garza Cub Master Cub Scout Pack #134 5752 Marshal Drive Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Carza The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at their regular meeting held Tuesday, July 61 f965, considered your request for the planting of trees in parkways on Springdale Street between Heil and Edinger Streets, and on Edinger Street both east and west of Springdale. The Direrc of Public Works informed the Council that trees r, have beennI,v heduled and purchases for this area, and will be planted as soon as man power in the department is available. `did+f Sincerely yonWs, :µ Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ a sg JTrR. HIGLEY CEN LAWSON PAUL PHILL H. E. NISSEN / PRESIDENT rIRST VICE PRESIDENT SECOND VICE PRESIDENT TREASURER 314 FIFTH STREET P.O. BOX 272 C R A M R E R O F C O M M E R C R 536-6564 536-6565 WILLIAM GALLIENNE MANAGER DIRECTORS April 14, 1965 TED BARTLETT � DON BYRNES �� IL Honorable Mayor and 7�pTf~vED BY GiY ,�©Urrc C. WM. CARLSON }`O MARK DOWNING Members of the City Council lq------- J. S. FARQUHAR City of Huntington Beach __�,PR..1_�..1���- ---- JACK FEEHAN City Hall ...... WAYNE FERRELL ""-'� Huntington Beach, California ... CITY ctiERK DR. MAX FORN EY �--^' DR. C. O. GRUBER E.A. HARTSOOK Gentlemen: J. R. HIGLEY STEVE HOLDEN The Huntington Beach Chamber' of Commerce Area R. M. JURKOVICH Improvement and Beautification Committee met April 7 R. C. KISER at the Sheraton Beach Inn and primarily discussed the DICK LA RUE KEN LAWSON the improvement of North Main Street. The conclusion of DICK LAYER the committee in conjunction with Jim Wheeler, Public H. E. NISSEN Works Director, who attended the meeting was the WM. S. PETERSON following: Quote: "That the Huntington Beach Chamber � PAUL PHILLIPS D. M. SEIERSENLLIPS of Commerce Board of Directors are requesting that the JOHN SIGRIST Huntington Beach City Council authorize the City ROGER SLATES Engineer and Public Works Director to create or fix HOWARD STEPHENS a median grade line approximately ten- feet wide with DARRELL WARD proper engineering from Clay Avenue, to Beach Boulevard" . HONORARY DIRECTORS. This, we believe would be a starting point and the RICHARD T. HANNA work could be done by City men and the cost could be J. A. MURDY JR. nominal due to the fact that it could be done at the DAMES E. WHETMORE will of the Public Works Director. � DAVID BAKER w.i .L In SO doing, the M. M. MCCALLEN median grade line would be a permanent fixtvare which would then be set for further improvements later. ADVISORY DIRECTORS MAYOR DONALD D. SHIPLEY We have in mind submitting a 3 to 5 year improvement � JAKE STEWART Program for North Main ,Street, Huntington Beach, and ROBERT M. LAMBERT each improvement- would ,properly complement the improve- ERNEST GISLER ment items to fo&low• THOMAS WELCH The establi-shment ,of a median grade line from Clay Avenue to Beach Boulevard is the first step and we would ask and request that you authorize the City I 4 * * THE LARGEST COASTAL CITY IN ORANGE COUNTY Engineer-Public Works Director to proceed with elty manpower and establish said median grade line with proper engineering on North Main Street. Your earliest acceptance would be greatly apprec- lated in the interest of area development and beauti- f1cation.' Yours truly, . R. HigieY. President William Gallienne, Manager .Row April 14* 1965 Honorabli Mayor and Membeis of the City Council City of Huntington fleach City Hall huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: The Huntington Beach Chimbei of CowrieTce Area t -�n Committe e m4t Apr%-1 7 Improvement and Beau Ificati s, 6 at the Sfieratno Beach Inn and primarily d1scussed the, the liprovement. of North Main Street,. The concluslon of tie wo committee In conjunction with Jim Wh"let, Public-,"ric's- D meet-1- trector, who attended the ng was the ioll;wing: ' Qu-ote:�' "'That t-h# Huntingte)n -9each Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, are "questing that the Huntington Reach City izo CoUncil author , the City Enginor and Public WoT s Director to-cte4te or fix a medlan grade line approximately ten feet w1de W.th proper engineering fro m,_Q,lay Avenup-' to Reach BoulevardO'4 Tfils, we be-lieve would be a stattin-9 point and the work could be done by Clty. men ana the cjstcoul-d be nomsn�l due to the fact that It-could bo,, done at the will of the Public Warks Director, In so doing. the median grade 11ne w6uld' be a perman-ent fixture Which uld then be set for further improvements latero We hive '-4.n mind submitting a 3 to 5 year improvement Program for North Mal'a Stie Hun'et, tington beach#, and ea,ch lmprove�ent­w-o Mo nuld properly complement the improve- t items to 'follow. ' e The Osta6 lisp ment' of a raedian grade 11, n from Clay Avenue to each Soulevaid is t6v first stop and we would ask and request that y*U authorize the. City Engineer-Publi.c Works rector to proceed with c$ty manpower and establish s,aid medlan grade line with proper_engineeTing on North Msl!4 Street. Ypur earliest acceptance would b6 greatly appTeC- lated in the Interest of area development and bdauti- fication. YOUTS truly$ (2 C /z/ e- j. P, HI C/ President J/ I'lliam G' allj. enne, Manager o�v�1TIN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California �C�UNTY April 1, 1965 CITY G��ivr.l,. APPROVED BY (jGj 19._...__ Honorable Mayor G and City Council ;,,r.....--�"" Y CLESg City of Huntington Beach Attention: fir. Doyle Miller City.Administrator Subject: Sunset Channel C07 Bolsa Chica Crgssing Gentlemen:, Transmitted herewith are plans and specifications prepared by the Orange County Flood Control District for construction of Sunset Channel across and adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street. The city's share of the cost for the construction will, be in accordance with an agreement approved by the City Council on December 7, 1964, and will be financed by state gas tax funds (186.1). I V It is recommended that your Honorable Body approve the plans and specifications and direct the Clerk to provide this office with two (2) certified copies of th' ��/ Council's action. Very truly yours, Jame s R. Wheeler �15irector of Public 'Works J1r?W:HEH:am Trans. &oe,I EXCERI-.a FROM MINUTES OF CITY COUI, .,.!L "MINUTES Council Chamber , City Hall Huntington Beach, California Ngnday, April 5- 1965 Mayor Shipley called the regular meeting of the,,City Council of the City- of- Huntington Beach to order at 7 : 50 P.M. Councilmen Present : Gisler, Stewart, Lambert, Shipley Councilmen Absent : ' Welch The Clerk presented a transmittal from the Director of Public Works of Plans and Specifications prepared by the Orange County Flood Control District for construction of Sunset Channel C07 across and adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street, with the City's share of cost for construction to be in accordance with an agreement approved by the City on December 7, 1964, and to be financed by State Gas Tax Funds (S. 186.1) . On motion by Stewart, seconded by Gisler, Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the construction of Sunset Channel C07 - Bolsa Chica Crossing, as prepared by the Orange County Flood Control District. Motion carried. On motion by Gislerseconded by Stewart the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hunt-i-n-gton- Beach- adjourned-. Motion carried. Paul C. Jones City Clerk and ex-officio -Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: Donald D. Shipley Paul C. Jones so Mayor City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange ss : City of Huntington Beach ) 1, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true- and correct excerpt from minutes of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 5th day of April 65 WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this 8th day of April , 19 65 Paul C. Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Bea-ph, California Deputy AR 5 196§ 1 \ DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 255 March 5, 1965 v Honorable Mayor and City Council . City Hall Huntington Beach California Gentlemen: SUBJECT: One Way Street Proposal The Downtown Business Association requests that the City Council authorize a study by the City of the merits of the following: (1) Making Main Street a one way street in the Southerly direction between Sixth and Ocean (2) Make Fifth Street one way in a Southerly direction between Main and Ocean (3) Install large size traffic sighs near 17th and Main to direct through traffic to the beach along 17th Street and local business traffic along Main Street (4) Allot monies received from parking meters to be used in traffic studies and off street parking studies. (1) Huntington Beach residents are inconvenienced and dis- couraged in driving into the Downtown areas due to the long lines of traffic which frequently are backed up to Palm (2) Adoption of the above would relieve the traffic conjection along Main Street, expecially during the weekends and the summer season. Respectfully submitted, Noble Waite, President NW:sk .;I � � l.� ,�,, � 106�(� ' R -� C� '�c��` Pew � �'n--. LPL - � �� � --�- �' yid -��� �.- ��- `� �c� ,z� '�� �� �. _ � �,.�� t �-�� �� - � � ..-�- .� �� �� INS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 0 ��0� Huntington Beach, California Cie• .isa � CpUNTY r'� _ February 11, 1965 APPROVED BY G:':'% T!NCIL Honorable TVla yor and City Council City of. Huntington Beach CITY CL$I[E Huntington Beach, California Re: Northwest Corner of Talbert and Gothard Gentlemen: I My office has been conferring with representatives of Standard Oil i Company in regards ,to a possible project at the northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Gothard Street. It is tentatively proposed to move some 'of the marketing division operations onto a site controlled by the pipeline divi- sion. The proposal :could be to occupy approximately one_ (1) acre of the 29—acre site. A few problems face full conformance to the normal City requirements of full dedication and improvement of the property frontages; some of which are listed below: 1. Grades are not established for the area. 2. Neither traffic nor adjacent development warrant the full improvement at this time. 3. Standard Oil Company has considerable fencing, pipelines and protec- tive berms that would be affected by the improvement. Therefore, the below outline of action, in this matter, is suggested. 1. Standard Oil Company will grant the necessary deeds for widening both Talbert and Gothard to ultimate width. 2. The requirement of immediate improvement or posting of a bond shall be :vaived: 3. TYie Director of Public Works shall administrat;*vely execute an agreement ,with Standard Oil, as follows: a. The City will allow existing facilities to remain in the place until actual improvement is necessary. b. Standard will agree ,to improve the streets in places as portions are required by the Director of Public Works. It is -recommended that your Honorable Body approve this outline, and direct the Director of Public 'Works to proceed with arrangements for the deeds and agreement. truly yours, J mes R. Vat eeler irector of Public Works JRIV:DWK:am cc: Tdr. Cleghorn, Mr. Bickner, Mr. Byrne ��pNtINGA. TpN� CITE' OF HUNTINGTON. BE ^u o " 2 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 0 9y,��e,��isb9�P' Q Huntington Beach, California .� CpUNTY �'� December 15, 1964 Honorable Mayor Re: Warner Avenue, and City Council Project 64A 2107 Funds City of Huntington Beach File 3-29 CC 020 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are the preliminary plans and the resolution adopting the prevailing wage scales for the realignment, construction and improvements of Warner Avenue from 650 feet east to 850 feet west of Algonquin Street, .The financing of this project is a cooperative effort with the State of California, County of Orange and private development. The tentative ,project estimate is $122,000.00 which is contingent upon a report, not yet received from the County soils laboratory, and upon the approvals of the County and State road department. It is recommended that your Honorable Body approve this project, adopt the resolution, and authorize the Clerk to advertise for bids upon notice from the Director of public Works that the necessary approvals have been received. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of'Public Works JRW:t ,? By K:hm H. E. Hartg Deputy Director trans. of Public Works i 07 1 , 1NGTpN� CITE' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 0 Huntington Beach, California �CpUNTy �'�` October 15, 1964 a-0 Honorable Mayor and City Council n U� City of Huntington Beach v Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a project statement on state forms proposing the use of Gas Tax Funds for the con- struction and improvements of the following streets Bolsa Avenue from Edwards Street to 1800 feet westerly, Springdale Street from Bolsa Avenue to 1320 feet south of McFadden Avenue, and McFadden Avenue from Springdale Street to 3960 feet westerly. Also transmitted herewith is a resolution adopting and submitting this budget of gas tax funds. It is recommended that your Honorable Body adopt the budget proposal and pass the resolution. Subsequent to this action the Director of Public Works will transmit the documents to the State of California Division of Highways for approval. Ve my yours, I es R. Vheeler Director of Public Works JRW:DWK:hm trans. 03 ����SINGT®�� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7 Huntington Beach, California June 11, 1964 Honorable Mayor and City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach., California Gentlemen: Attached is a letter from Mr. E. D. Gordon requesting that ' he be relieved of the requirement of constructing street improvements at 7412 Talbert Avenue. This department has investigated the site and has con- cluded that there is no physical reason the work should not be done now. However, because Mr. Gordon addressed his correspondence to you, it is requested that your Honorable Body consider the request. Very truly yours, es R. Wheeler irector of Public Works JRW:a AttQ City Council Per. James R. Wheeler Huntington Beach„ Calif, n Dear Sir# I am writing in re#arils to the street improvements on Talbert Ave. I haee relocated a building at 7412 Talbert Ave. and the improvements on either side of my"property is not in and it w,) uld create a safty hazard to put the the improvement in as it would leave an island of greund on either sidt of me., I „vo uld like to past 'boind.'until they are ready on .each side of me as I truthi'ully believe it woald be a much better job rather than doing just A* fifty foot strip. Sincerely ours, E.D. Gordon 4 I e l In 7 /2 4�) I �'iSTfr�G _STiZEi r" o jo f'.!�- 6W R 7-,E,a PRo�rErh��i�" I