Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStreet Openings - Extensions - Closures - 1960 - 1985 - Circ 461 v�S G D�`cypF� � 1985 p Huntington Beach City Council �C1 C pr�BFgC 2000 Main St. b, xec r s+A-FL � C, N Huntington Bch. , CA. 92648 �hu_QS�'cyA'f'� 4- r"IOesi- w-� J Q-;1 (1 ATTN: Huntington Beach City Council Clerk 1��It is requested that time be allocated for the undersigned to make a public presentation to the Huntington Beach City Council at their earliest convenience. This public presentation will center on the concerns of the undersigned concerning the "Faire Marin" development that is being constructed North of Santa Barbara Ln. and South of Edinger in the Huntington Harbour area. Since both of the undersigned live on Saybrook Ln. just South of Santa Barbara Ln, this development is of vital interest both from a traffic safety and property value stand- point. The undersigned- feel that serious questions have arisen which should be brought to the Council ' s attention for possible action. The undersigned are prepared to make this public presentation to the Council at any time except during the week of August 19 - 23 during which time both parties will be on vacation. Please let us know when this public presentation has been scheduled before the Council . ",2P , l j8s 2 rS�� 9/r N., Fred & Dona H lmick Larr & Sue ottlieb 16271 Saybrook Ln. 16281 Saybrook Ln. Huntington Bch. , CA. 92649 Huntington Bch. , CA. 92649 ( 714 ) 840-8282 ( 714 ) 840-9887 FLH: ln I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Lj2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK August 12, 1985 Mr. and Mrs. Fred Helmick 16271 Saybrook Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 This is to inform you that you have been scheduled to make a presentation regarding the "Fa-ire Marin" development at the City Council Meeting to be held Tuesday, September 3, 1985. The meeting will begin at 7:30 P.M. and you will be allotted time under the "Public Comments" section of the meeting. If you have any questions, please call 536-5227. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt CC: Paul Cook, Director of Public Works Jim Palin, Director of Development Services (Telephone:714-536-5227) Date/Time 05/17/2001 11:27:50 AM City of Huntington Beach Page 1 Office of the City Clerk s ^-� Records Ref Category Subject Entered Status Document Expires Box ID Label 650.70 02/14/1996 Microfilmed 8085 Sale of Surplus Property Saybrook Ln/Santa Barbara 800.50 116 09/24/1984 Microfilmed 3149 Vacation: Streets, Alleys Santa Barbara Ln portion of/ San Clemente Circle/Mandalay Circle Recorded: 9/24/84- Res 5437 800.50 116 10/18/1972 Microfilmed 3148 Vacation: Streets,Alleys Santa Barbara Ln/Saybrook Ln por of Recorded: 10/18/72-Res 3586 Total Records Detailed: 3 REQUL%iT FOR CITY OUNQL� ACTION Submitted by 'Paul E. Cook Department Public Works Date Prepared January 23 , 19JLI Backup Material Attached 0 Yet No Subject Closure of Weatherly Lane City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL V �. -19.U. Approve as Recommended �e5 CITY CLERK Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: r\Ai Statement of Issue: The Weatherly Bay Homeowners Association has requested that Weatherly Lane be closed to vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the north side of Warner Avenue. Recommendation: Hold a public hearing for the purpose of hearing all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed partial closure and adopt a resolution ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. Analysis: At the meeting of January 5, 1981, the City Council passed a resolution of intent to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue and set the.date of February 2, 1981 for the public hearing. Notices of the proposed street closure have been posted conspicuously along Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue indicating the time and place for the public hearing. All the utility companies have been notified and no objections have been received regarding the closure. The Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the request for closure and their comments have been incorporated into the design of the closure. The actual construction of the closure will be accomplished in accordance with construction plans to be approved by the Department of Public Works. All costs, including permit fees, will be. assumed by the Hcny-�ers Association. Alternatives: 1. Do not approve the closure of Weatherly Lane. 2. Approve the closure for vehicular traffic only. Funding Source: No City funds are expected to be expended for this project. PEC:RRL:jy Pio We 1N THE Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CITY CLERK PROOF OF PUBLICATION Resolution 4952 RESOLUTION N0.4952 State of California ) A.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CYPY'OF HUNT- INGTON BEACH OF INTENTION TO CLOSE WEATHERLY LANE AT Y Orange g ) WARNERAVENUE The City.Couricillof the,Qty of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: Rita J. Richter SECTION I`.,Puntuant to Division 9,Part 3,Chapter 2 of.the California Steets and Highways'Cde(Sections M20 et.seq.),the City Council of the City of Hunting- That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ton Beach hereby declares its intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue,as shown on Exhibit A,attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I SECTION 2.The City Clerk is directed to maintain on file in the office of the am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; City Clerk maps or plans showing the particulars of the,proposed closure of Weatherly that I am theprincipal clerk of the tinter of the Lane at Warner Avenue,and reference is hereby made to said maps or plans for said P particulars as to said proposed closure. SECTION 3.The City Council does hereby fix February 2.1981 at the hour of Huntington Beach Independent Review 7:30p•m.,oras soon thergsheras the matter may be heard in Council Chambers inthe t Civic Center,as the time and place for hearing all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed partial'closure which time is not less than fifteen days,t+rbm'the passage a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of of this resolution. SECTION'4.The-City Clerk is directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published in the Huntington Beach Indpendent,a newspaper of general circulation, Huntington Beach within fifteen(15)days of the passage of this resolution. h SECTIONS.The Director of Public Works is directed to poet,or cause to be posted, notices of street closure conspicuously along Weeatherly Lane at Warner County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- pMeowosted st least,ten three days before the date of the hearing.Such notices shall be g g .posted not more than three hundred(300)feet apart,but at least three(3)shall be ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had posted-Such notices shall state the passage of.this resolution of ihtention"d'the time and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and Place of hearing. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January;1981. lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a RUTH C.BAILEY I period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the Mayor ATTEST: annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular ALICIA M.WENTWORTH and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement City Clerk thereof,on the following dates,to wit: STATE OF.CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS: -CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 1,ALICIA M.WENTWORTH,the duly elected,qualified City Clerk of the City January 15, 1981 of Huntington Beach,and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City,do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January,1981,by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen:PATTINSON,FINLEY,BAILEY,MacALLISTER,KELLY Noes: Councilmen:NONE Absent:Councilmen:THOMAS ALICIA M.WENTWORTH I certify �4 (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- City Clerk and ei-officio Clerk ing is true and correct. of the City Council of the City ;. of Huntingwn Beach,California Dated at...................GgrOn Grove Pub.Jan:15,1981' ••••••-•••• Munt_Beach Ind.Rev.-10128 Califorp, ,t i ... t ay.4an . Y 19..88.1 . Signature /V Form No.GAF-81380 f I REQUL-jT FOR CITY COUNQ . ACTION � Paul E . Cook Director\L— Submitted by Qpartment Public Works Date Prepared December 15 .. , 19 80 Backup Material Attached Xn Yes No Subject Closure of Weatherly Lane City Administrator's Comments Apploy V IgX CITY COUNCIL Approve as Recomm nded CITY CLER Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: (l`" Statement of Issue : lJ A letter has been received from the Meatherly Bay Homeowner ' s Association requesting that Weatherly Lane be closed to vehicular and pedestrian traffic on the north side of Warner Avenue. Recommendation: _ Adopt Resolution of intent to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue . Analysis : In addition to the benefits cited in the Association' s letter, the removal of a left-turn pocket and access point just east of the Warner Avenue bridge will improve traffic safety at that location. The Police and Fire Departments have reviewed this request for closure and have indicated their comments on the attached memorandums . The actual construction of the closure will be accomplished tri accordance with construction plans to be approved by the Department of Public Works. All costs, including permit fees, will be assumed by the Homeowner' s Association. Alternatives: 1 . Do not approve the closure of Weatherly Lane . 2 . Approve the closure for vehicular traffic only. . Funding Sources : No City funds are expected to be expended for this project. PEC:RRL:ek i P10 3/78 RE CEIVE �. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH • To Ralph Leyva From Ed Vasi le Traffic Engineer Administrative Deputy Subject CLOSURE OF WEATHERLY LANE Date September 5, 1980 The Fire Department has made a comprehensive study of the Weatherly Bay condominiums in regard to' the closure of Weatherly Lane. Since the complex does present a potential fire problem, we feel that two access drives are necessary for fire protection. However, we would accept an openable gate with a 24-foot minimum width at the entrance to Weatherly Lane. The gates should be equipped with a Knox Box device. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 536-5567. EV:sh o��� �Leyua� I J ' F t- t 7 t �14✓��rf HE I'll �. `y v "'A'_rY'._tip ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION P. O. BOX 3334. ANAHEIM. CALIF. 92CO3 January 12, 1981 City of Huntington Beach P.0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: Alicia W. Wentworth, City Clerk Subject: Resolution 4952 - Closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue Thank you for notifying us in regard to Resolution 4952, intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. The Gas Com' Pany maintains facilities within the area of the proposed closure. We have a 2 inch gas .main in Weatherly Lane located 5 feet West of the East property line and a, 4 inch gas main in Warner Avenue located 55 feet.North of the Centerline of Warner at this •point. These facilities provide an essential service to our customers. Location prints are attached for your reference. Should the City adopt the above resolution, we would request a perma- nent easement be reserved over that portion of the closure to permit our continued use and operation of our facilities. In part, this easement would require that .no structure be built over or near our facilities and that we have permanent access to our faci- lities. If you have any further questions, please contact Elaine Stark at (714) 634-3118. Sincerely, J.D'. Alden Technical Supervisor ES/pjg Enclosures - 2 �. --' ,7 - ,• ,i_ ". :ij:_:, 1. a,+. 1[_w' -`,tA`-4 f 3'1rrd�.�{,' r... .'- d5. +-1 ._. I a - - - - r - - q Rp.- F _ I. t i.' yE�U a F .R . -� d)J- �- �. r `f Y mI.�. -IA V. r 'r N l f y e i Y4 ft I - " - % } f G .. \ t _ �/a f r ) - i- 4, -.y Y_ t `�J. s J t s .;V 5.. -_ 'N:t'"�I�;,;I.-.,I,....I.1.,�I.,i-I;.:.:.II.-".-1 I"--4.-..--.�.`�1 I:i',.�..:.1--'-;);,1. .,-',-'-.��.-�: �..,m;.:....�....'.1,,...'-.':.,-'".... '�---...' .5,A'':,.'I*:'�,.'.,,-,�.�',..'.,,, '-'',.,...I.�.....-,..:,,....-L"­I�.,���'.,�4i:..''t-,.,-..:.1­--...��.-I.,;:,-.'. .-��i-.'a-�.''-...-;'..-..,...',.,".I-.-...':.�:,.�%.-.....-�..f,,-';;�. N 1...i-'-i'.,..;.-I.'..."%::I:I:L...It;-',.�.:.,.1-',;1-.,I L..-I:M.1.-.o.-,':.I-.-'..--....,.;1.-"-,w,-'I.1,...�-'..'.�''1�'.I.�.-.:_-L..'�.�-%.4'.-'''-I�'�.'-,'-....I..-U-'......A...,'...:,...:�,-:---..AI-.'-�t.I.-_..�-1.,.. .'-A./.*-..I:�..1'..1 L. -....,Y'''-I'"'-k:-:-.�.-A...r.:--".��,-.''*'�;--:'w-:.._��;.--,'..'�7.'-�-.421'.��.'-'-..,-�,I1.,�,.,-.-.--!.Nj--�',�.�.rZ..�;r"A'm"'-I-�I ft-�-1'7....'..�e�,.71 ,.�%Z�.,�!.�.,..'_.".'_''."�".�4,'�!�...,�-'_-LI.-',';-��.1-.""�:.r"'�%1-'."�"I-_'1-;'.',��04.,�,,,i,.:.-..L'..-,"�,�,','�f.i..'..a.1�.'%I..'-".'-;-,1,.%'!�-..','"�,.-1",�.%I�.:.,1,,.-...'�;!...','�R.�.."..,'....11-.';'.0,�..;-,....-,:I...�. -'''---',-'f,-�','.'--j.:.-!I'%-: .�.i.','.--.-.kr.-­.-t j.-4��;�!.,'t .1..'. R;..1.,:..L I'",.�,.I'.'-..FtL"'I,,."-7'-.,�"�I-"-1-F-'-�I-...'.,-'I4"":�.I-��;'�..'-1,-;,�..I.-."�'.-.-%..�,-�,-''..:I.1.-.".�..-I.�..'.,.",..',,�-,�..'..�­.'..:..1.,1;�:z.,'',,I.T--Z."�'."-;.-7:z�.;.-�',-.��A`.��..-.I.. ri .y4 l , _• a d '!'?�-,'-","--.�..�'"2�-XI..�:-.,--.I-'1--, �,-%..��.!1 t'.S;'��.�'-�k�1 I,:"-�i%jj .:-,.-i,,-'�-".'-'-"-...'-;�'-'�...-..�:-�'-_" { '/ fYt�hl.-- '''."'_'-'.;-,_.-,'�(i..�"I�.'-7i.,.''-'I, f.# S.1 t1 �..�;,-.'I-I--....,.m�.:::-".--1:...-I�-,I.1.:.---',;-,I..,".I%h...."..-.I1'..,.I�'---�--.,',.��..-.�,...p�...'-.�I'I''I.:.-.,..'*-"..�,:-I'::'%.I. 'Z..L'�-1.':I. ':-1;.:�-''I1�.".L L J.-'-.'�'I---'.,I:� II"'�i"'.II:,... -'7". ,�...j.".,..!"�-.'.'II''--.':'.�.... .,'.�I.:-v.,-..---.-..�1 j-�.;',"1,..'..�4 7:'!%-.:.t11,��f-�'.:.,.:"�."I,''.,�,'.�L�.-1-.,I.--'.-;....-I-'1�-��"jI.-.:%"'',t�.!�..,.-.-�I�'.I,,.�-.'q�..1"-.,.-L:'O'�.,..1:.-I.-.':1...�.-''.;...l., .:'Z,.:1.k.'..;.'LS-,.".':I-:-I;'-""-;;�....1-.�,:.-i7,j.::..'-.,"1.�.I'-".�T-.".;'!-''.I.,.-."'..,'..,..��"..-.��I"�:�"I�.:%.'��,-..'--,�,.I"":.....:'--'-.,.-....I:,-�.-�-:�:I*...'�'-I.-.I...'.'.q t....."1......'.-'.:.t.��.�..:.,�L I.;.-.-.1..'':'�-�.-.I'I.-*.'--:--,,-.�.-.1:'"�...:..,...-.."-:-'--.�'';?-L.-..�.'f.rI.'.1,';.�,.�.�!.j 1.Z�.��""-.-.;.Y......i.'i.I�.,.�,-�.1 I-'.'.".-1'..-�...-':,.-":4..r-�......'..'F.,�:..�',.:.�.....-'''�.I�. ,.I.I�'��.::M-..�.,,.-..---.---,-I..��-.,-'I.-t,'-.',�!.i�:,��"�-,.',.� ,--I.-iL'.'�.':;.-.-.:-.;-...�_,:,��..4-.'..'.'.M,r...;.I--"'..�,*-�..I...'',:..-.�I��­1':,"".:''t'.,.�..._.'-'.",;'�m:1 �..t-,..-_... .,.-,.."��.I�:.:'''I�I...I-,"...,L�'.''....-,q-:-.L,-..M-..-.,.�.!�...i"..�.,.'......:...,....L-:,'"...-..'-,I."...I.I.-:..I-........-...L'-.�j..-.N,-......��..,.....1,.-..-1'L:..�._-..,.'"......I:"�--i.�I.'-rI 1-..-.�*..'M._.'..,',��..,�,..�"I:..:':L.....-...."-...I'.�*.,.r,..-�-.--m-'._..�.e.I,'':.-,.-..'.1 L'�,��...I..-,..�',�''.-�...t-...I:�-.::.L",I-'..'-.-'�-..'t�-'-:-:.��...-....,!-�.-�.-�''1.%,t.�I:.-'.*--:.. I't�,"":,'t',�:..�.-,..",p-.�..-�..�.1.:.!--;...1.,::'..-I.,.�.!.-...:'�,.'-I..'.,,.�-;.-'.1.'..*.�..-.-,'.�...!..-....,...:�7.-.''J',,-...,''..'-1.%1....I...I.-I..L.'.,-.,'---L�--..:.1I-.':1'''..;.".7"':-,.m,..-'-�."::--.'.-..-..�.­-.,I4-,.'T.."::-.'":"......�.-.'�-'..--;..,..-..-­".,...."I-.---I--".'.-'��'..1:..�'---.:..:-`.-"�'�,-L�,.-,-.--,:'..�:I'.'I'.-'.-�.-.'",."I''..-..,:.,1.*.�-....--�-..--.'.�.��.n'L..I�..,.--�.!-'..-:,.-,..'"I--..1'�",�iI..1...-.I"�-1,-�""I.-��"%..,..'..-.,��..;I.,!-,.-I,-�-..-'.--...I--....,-A.�"...1.-'.-.-;..-!.1-.I.....,�*--.-...I.-.-e..�.-':.'i'.,,�,...-..1..�,%..1..�.-.'-,...'...:I..,.�-1.:'o...'.,..-.�:.',-.I t.L-..I.�-,%'..,':'......L�..'-�'.:.'I.�:'.�..."....'.,.'iL.:.;,�-.L....�.......1.:.-1._,-:.I'.:'l.I...i,:��.IL':,�.,�...:'..",L..;,.t:�-.'..,..*.-.'"-...�..I....1..�..II�.-1"-,...IL"..;...4.'1.'...-��......:."..1�..-;'.'...:--.,.,.I.'.....'...--�.-.-....-:..�..,:--*,.�.;....-�.�..".�...-I-..''.rI,.I--�,..--!..''-.:II....-....,.�.-�.,.-..-,'I:;.:.....-..�...-:1�.'.�?..-f�..�-.*t�1....:F;.-�..'1 1.;..I:.-1-...-''...,...1-"...a,.",.--.-..*,�..-..�,.I,1..-...f...I--'I,I I,,.;-1.,:...��.,'..,.,-;I.��-�..-..�.'�....�.-,��',�.'--.,''-;..'..'..,..:�,i.,-.,i'.'.-..-.-�..'.�,..::.-k:.-...�,......;.I...-..'.'';"i...-..b.,�'-.-,I,,j,..!:.I:":.'.IL...'?I-.......'-....��....."!..;�-i.'4'1..'I.....i�..I"4.�"�."..'-.I'..'...�-."-....�.'..-I,'�-�.-,.':--..-�'.�.,.�,-.'.-.,..�.,..I.�..-,-"'�i'a.'..!m--:.-�,.,,�L'.,.�.'.�-':..�-''..,,..,:.�-.�.-.!�...­,-...,..'.;:--'I:71--.1'..I.�......,:....,--...-:.--...L-..�-..,.I.:-,L.II...��.'��..L.'..,.'I".-.,,.-...,'.-.--,'.:'',,�.,.,:-..--:,�-�i....,,-,..-.�.".....,'"-�-...'..�..�..-.-�..,:...I"-..I.-.".'-..,�:.'-..�:�....t.;..:.:,2....!--.-L:L.�...I-.,". ,....,,..�,"-- �,,:.�.:...,.''.-�.�:-.'�--.'-'...--�-.:....-....�,-..-'.I-..L..I�,..-�-...'.-'�'-..,-.�..'..-.'-.,i-',�....��:.I---.-,....L'�-.'--..-:.,�.a.I.-�.%.,..-,.�...I----.;.-I-..--,.i".�..'.,.-.",�'-...-�.;..i�,..'���,!.1..t....L....-..L'I'.��;,.I..I..�..:(,.'%...-.-.-!-.-.�..I.�'�.L...,I...,'---.'�I\.,...%%�.. "`..-.-�--t*.',,...i...-:..:..;..6...";..,.--1�'k'-".'-.:".-I.-i;. ....'.�..'.:I.I-"..':-I.�,'�...,.....'.'.,---.I,,�-1.�...L...�.1.I-�...�.'1"-.�.-�--.�.'..I.I�''.�..L,I:f�...L.'-�I...��1..: ��-.i':-..�i'...k.:..'-....1..L'1f ..-.����--.'.-I,..'.�:...�'...--.'...---'...;.,,-I:�.�..!.,-:.,4.--/".�..'.-�--..�..;,�...-.!.;.�.I�..!'�,..-.'I,.-.-�'.........'..I.'..7 I.'%..,,'....r"....."--.'b-....--.-.:.:,'...;- .......,...:':.�;..'':.....,''-i�-.-.'..�'t':�...I:..;.-.I.::.-.: -\'',..I.-,!.,'t.iI'L.:L. ..�:1-....-.-XI�:.-;..",�!II-I�:.-..,.-...L--.......�-.,':.'.-..;..:.-L L---.,..,,'-.,,;..�,.'�m.-'.1. I.":.,-:'�.;�.-.....�,-e:.:,:.I...':-.."--...�-,...-...:1..�-.�:*s,;.-...:-..';.r.--;.1..-I....L..-:.1-. �I.---L.,.,."--.�....�....:'..,'..�..,.,.--.....�,',,:% :-..:.4,-..,.�..�...::..:-.:.-�,...':-1_ .,...%....",'.'I''..-"...,.��:".--,L,.�'.-'._,.,�I�I.-�',..4;.'�..��'.......-.."r_,*:.'...--.-...-I I.-..':-�-.s#'.-I:.-'�'...3-::.-��-k,"'..,'t'':.....i�:'.,..;',-,..-:-.�.-..--..I.�.-.',�.....;.,.".,-.-�!,''.1I...-,::''.:.""1'.,...-1.'"�-..,"N,,.t...-.'.�������II.'-'L-."-.i.:.L:--�.-.�..L�,..��L-:.I..-,,.r,:;;�..-,--t�N�,...-��.'N-��.--'- .':i111111i��"'.-.,';�-'.-...;.�"1!L�-''_..F i-.,:iI9,�--�-�..I".�,.-:-.j,:'--2�-.�.!!!!!11�.-.-,!"..',�,'.-.�'!�L:,---'�.�':-'�'',.%-.1 Z--I�:-�1..-'�-��;". '''1.I-'"..�.-.�--;,II-'�:1-'.".,'' .''-"".-,�..'-�.--��.;;,-x-.�-,".I...,!',I������'."-'',*',-.�--''''''��.,.�1.'.--'I..-..,...i.....�",'-.'-�'-..--.�.�,'--, --.�.�:"'--,1�-I���,:,�.�''Y:.-',�.i-���������1..I-,,..',I t'-���*..�,��&N�.',i..I I.X'-,:II:�-;KV..',"c-..�'.''''''''',-.-..-.�.''N.'-"'�.:.�-.�.-.-.��������I,.":!'-'.,;.-,..'...'',..'':,,-L-�.�Z.."I.�,.��'.:'1,�; ��:..'-'.,".-I--�'�".�'-'l...N,'I-,",..,IA:..,i.I�.-*t,-. ..-�-.'.�1�...��.-lI,.'-:.'�Li'-..,.-,',-..,-k...."�.'.:.'",�z".�I..."--.1..�...I.,.-',.Am"..::.'I..'-.-.L....I�.L.:...�,.'." ,.-:.-.-�'-:I'�,.- �:I.-,-�:,-!-�,.-.--,�:�_:.:'' ,�L....�I..I..;''."-.I, 1.I-.�,, '.."1:..'':-""'�.,I....-f�-Ir�a�'-'',1.-.X;I'',i.;-',.-.:�*-.....,'1��.1',..,,'.-:�-I-:. `'..;I:...-�.'..-.,-;.l- ..'.i i..-..',,'.��1.,..- ..-.�"L-',,':--i.I:-��..� ...-.,.�',,.I-.'-�-..�,.1-I.�._.,'""I�z..:1'*1,....'�.-�,'"--.I,�-�.-�-�L".t..,'-..�-i...-.',..;',;:..I,..�',..:-"-;..�',''."...,.',��-.'"-.'- ,".....-!�.'....'.�,*f .�`-:�:�...,..'�."`.�-'v:!-.-'..'.--...'"".'.x�.,'..�'--.j.-�V,1.;;.1..1..!'.-,,�.:-.��'..I,��..�''-,.�"..::,.:*.L'1"'�.--�--�...................".:%�--.'..;,�--'.'"-�..-.-.:_"I-:.�..,'..,.'(".i '*"..!?��1'.'-.,I---..'-.''...............�....w.'.I,.-."%�.II�...,I 1"'.,f ......%-'.-.."�4,._.::,..-,:*.-.1-!-.�.,;;I�'.�...%"'".....%�'.-'��',-..1-.'I;-r;,L"-,,.....:".I-j.-�..I."�,-,".--...I.I.�-,;i.".""...LL��;-.,,''.�;''.-k,.-.'... ;....I:,.I'�...,'�'-.*�...-.-'.�".:�.�,-�, .IU.---...I.-'�,.,::-':..,I:��:..'.,I.'�1--r.�,i.,.,I,-I'..,-­,:��.'-I".L.'.fI:'L�.!.-..'--..'..,I�.'�-�-- .Jv.....;?-,�.,-'---.-"'1-�..l'.J''1-'.'-,-�..-.--�4�'.,,",iiI.*I�,....L."1�...""-!-",:.-,I-....�-.- ".�':'��--..-'-�1,,,,�...,':-:-.-�.-.,.-,.-,-II;_..1.'�-.''!'"-.�-'-.4 t�."'"..--�.:.:6_4..--'-',....;.;,.. -"'-:,��-4-"....%%LI.'�-".'-,-*-�"-..'��� _*,,,),.,''..�.1:�'..%I�".-�'�'?,o-I..��.'�.-:�'�.I;-Y.,I,�.-,-.'���., --;-'-,''Z--I:-.,.:.,I-,.......i..;,..-..;.i�;-.::�.'-,,,-,'"-.-..,I-I�"".,-..m,':-.' .'-'-..-',�,.I.'-'._­...R 4"�.".-.��-1..I-Iv�-"-�I.iUIi-...�'f_-'..'-'., .,'Vi.::-L 1'.';-.,,.��:S"-�"'..%�-h.7'I,--�-�..r''.,,- I"...-,j,-',.'-''j,.'-.'",-.1'.-;'.'..--1r.�'-"'.';..���K A"1t..t.'-,�tFI ..._:,'-.-A;-"';I�1".--i.,,,�.'"-..­,-'1..."".�"-.-;<.-.-,�'...,;;.I.-� ""-,-1;';'--;g-P L--'.,--'-'.-X"-,Z`."�,�.-I_:-.;.s�A %..-.,--...-.,---,�'--'�I-*-..'.�.i- .!,"'--I,,�.1,.z.,',,#N-"a.y k4.*-,%..'':...I-],;'!',-.'"-,,:---.I "�-.'..'.."-�".,-L �-.I'�.;:";�-I�-f.--t..-�i.-.;":� �;-',t..'�-.',��-,_ l i .I:1�,-J'.!s�"-.,vi�"..a"-'.�'�,..I,-.-o, 4'-�..:.,I�"�f-!%..�"-'�",1-I.'..--.! I,rI'..4-:i�-',,,'�,...�i,"��"1'*-!�':, �.,,,,,,,'-I.-�''.�e'�I`,-I.,;%., ."-QI.--:.-!.,.IW�7'1-;;'"�Z�'I".I.L, -::'!..'�-,""-.-'.'%''...--k--.._-."I":I?-ftI"�..,-7,'...". .�..-......'1'--�..�'"-..�"-1.z��"- .''if'-.�'I,��'%�:-'I.'�7....1�..-..�,",:...'"'.'-3"ik"m,'.�..f:��,:1--.�'�.�:..-_',..;1-..-1!_�".I".12'.",4 ..�-".�'1r-:4.4"��I-;-j I",-��i":1;-�.,"-'_..I�0--�-,;.''�k. I.LLLI I1'�-�6---o'.��-L­;1'1-- �..-,''.�-.-1,.<' --;"7,, -''-1---".!,;i;.;L-.,.11.,',." ',::.-;:-:;.��.I1 jI'`..-�j�;-.".'�..I �.,.-:".'l..I. ....'.�..t�4;'!, .,"j:".. .-.-',-L,-.I.!-�.'1 t.I..j�,�2 ...�-',"�..;. :,'r f-�I.,��'..�.�, .I'' ,-,...,�.-!-__�.,��-.' '-,-'-.,...-� �'..`II*i.."-',L"�j:'W� �,-',"1':'.i.,�.d�!'1,��-I' �.-,--:-:�. :.,:;��'�.-�,-1,�i'.-.I I I'.%,:--.-,'.' ."'.'.-''.-��-�.'*' 1��-',-.-"....2'L.,�".�'.,�-..L1,.."-�"'�.;J'I-'7.H..'.'"V.-.I..,1 C'..---O-..,-:..- :'.---"�.'" �,,'..'.-..-,."­-...-;�.7.-11 ..1 Z....�". t-,'..- �...-.-:1.,,j.".�',!--:.-��'-N'-�..6-...''.!774.,.,1-'...--.:.,-­-'o:'� )--"-',:..I''.L.-,....1�.".1'-I"-..-.� �.��""-'--.f,-".X...".."'...'l-".� ..�:'�.I.�.-;.-.%!1-�-"�1'­-.....-.. .�.:.!,I.a-...-.:''--"-",'".I�f'.�...'.%;�d_":::-�.",.-1'.'-;""''-I-'.'.�':.�-':,..,-.- �,..�...I..i-:X-.-,-* .A...'.:" ��,'.."...- -':-�!.-.--�..I,-...-.'.-4, ..-z',�'',-.".'-..b I..."�,-..--'.�.k` ...'.-."-I-.4.-'-!1L.,�..., 11'II-.-.�-.,r''..:..�-�I-A...W:' C.--..-,.� ,".-%.L-.-"'..`"�.1;�..I�'-';4'-':.I.''�.,L1..'.�:.1-,�;�;;.� �--.���� '".'-..--:�:,�L,�--,:-..,.;,­...'�,..9w"�; .,.,i-.-�,.'...' �::.-:''!.44',--,-"'.'t. '"',I.-k r-"�.'.�.�i..,.i"i''..�'�'�!..-.---..'.. ',...,"-�,�..y',�.'.,.'. .�.�..:.,.'I11I..I-�-� ,,,.,�.�.��..I1�...,,....; �L-��.'- ;.::,..,''111.�..:.-.-Y.1.1,- .�1-.I.�L�.., .�1.I-.�.I.��-.�,.4"1,.-I-'�.e;y.1,.Z�;1.1'.,-�... -I,.I.�.-- ,*;..*','.::tL.'..,.-..c-... P,.?:,a ',..,.f1 l..p� "J'-.'....'-,-,-'.:t.ftJ--I�.­ -"�.%..-.'4..�.�,..I. ,..1---.) F I - , 'r. ' 6-' .., rt �0-%..:�.�-f--',. '.-%''.--I� -.�I..r .'I4�.'�.I..���-..�:.-.:r...�.- �...�-�'�!'%.0.'.'4��....�-pZ*7':-;.�'ft--."�''t F�:-�.''I. ..,I."i'I111.%IN!;...,'�!.-.-.�. �,;�1'V'...�,'..-..-."..-�-.%;%I'..."-.1,.-�. ,-4....--...*�;. -;''.-- f-' .f',.t-1.�:,I '..�.,1..,�;'��.' .t;-...'�:,.1.-'.�- .,'-;.,l.S....".;".;�I.-., .I.�.;._-;^.a"...:-�,.I..'�.,I�:''-.-..--"..-" -";,.-.�".." ....---.,...*7�LI:�.'.�:.'":. .:L- .....�1tt;-'- t. -""-' .�--,. ;- !-.I!.....': -�-.I I-...'.'- :.'..". \. .. - f ys t R _ _1- r -I -4 Y ,- _ rI 3P. . Y -- \ l _-� 45 - - 4 } I"- { r - - -°i .. j . 'it •rntn. l^CTI ..rti • Y _w •" _^-•> -• -1..` _ t1' �\ t1 i e :. ti ,:. � Q.. �tJ Z ' DJ �i i._i. a �F -. - *.0.A�.,.';:.,,- ?9..- ... .1 - .-. �r . 1 f e+ r t.c ♦ q/ -%" ;.....-,.­.�.I%. ,�*. LI. i.I 1 I ', d 4 '.-'.';;-:p".',?'"'...1L�' N tY w .14 rt III-; t c w ...%..­�,-.-.,4....�'.-- S ,_ _ , . - �.-',)�,,',.:""I"-�,--1.:..".r�.��I" -�"I�;.-.;'9",I;- ,,:.I A(-I"".-"''',--..-.'--L-.�".Z4.,'.''."-" .%.-1.'';..,- ,-�".'*, '-�.I-.'v--­�':.-'..,.-..."�":.'1.*-. .�".., .---1I--"4It-�..--",�;..:1,"..,:;'."..P..g-z,''.�1,�,..,� o,,P `e, r, .% ti1 {4 - 5 _ - ; '�."�'-"�-I'.?','!�-�....,:'�,�,�,.�,-�, ,�.�.,-��,`�-j.4....�I".I...�'�'I I--".-'-,-i4" "-r"'.."I.,'i".A. .�.--,�-,-�� ,,,w,0.",-;5.-'-'.I--...4I'.- '"1...�'.I1.-.- Pi ' O- o .- -•1 a -' Jz -I '�11w1r'!N1 fi. tt�� r ! t,��_ 0 1 _4 'J _^ • )• sit 5- a'v -1. .r _`1 __ `1 y.k. '.2.i .',;�:-.,:.".t:.1'q 1.'';'."��i.I.�::-...""'I�,I.""-.-1,�.r.-.i1,.I�.-.'.1"�--'.'.I.'-1,��,,"i..-.�-.�..."!'',,....11-;.-.-...'�','�'--.',I�-." .. s - )t - Y - �` L, yt _� �'1,3._'7`.It i 'w,4 Sjt` T A - • _ _4. ll 4 d '� .fy .d F \t t t ti 4 J "z ,{ e f I k r krn �.r�•'F?'�af.�.Q' F '7 t't1 FA.n `d thJ.nA _tlh fir'�ti-¢Y,�f• j/ . vT. '. , - -:n t �- s t-d; f rrS awl tt s i75t bra a s +Z{r vi}t- S„ s)w - ' tI ? 1 7 _ is tt - { -r- 1 -'' _ �f r I.1 P _, t t. -P,� Y�x. 'k'y,�'d` 911ti t '' j\ah w }-'fit _ �tl+-f'g- 'fit+J�rt }i\t�..I - .}M. '4 a}�` i{{y J- r .t -4.,p`Sp, is v ,lf':`:�ti `' �S " -3t S - {t- r d r ,s�.Y'.f1 a t'`- ! i s.� ~ J ,r •+� -• _t_. f - _k;f � Y.( �ft i-y�\' 'i'l h'�4f"? 1 1.'� .,lr --(trot dt qv{ t-- .�+-�� P 1 _ _ _ - _ { ? {yy, S .4 sJh r j'- I#fir �FU:';i(t-�v��Y t . . Y } ,yy I. y r rC �s`f7wF swt tr -% , J nYQ..1 t r I V x �n Js l F f' ' "-{d M y f {i-" i '' yaiT"n t'r'-i,' •yid' r -i,.> 1 _f T $.r- %" t _JF tit Y c; IT I,C I �, �Itj rM/ 7r 'y{�t i -LI . - • .. i ft _- Yht`dtti•ko- _ `< rl`i�i_P r.S muy- vY\/�, JS+ 1 P . R.. �\ { �..I� 7;�ii'4{x i - - - - . t ' y,f c� . r t - I ��.Yyy Y .Y l<i`1 vt 4 y 1 r t r I a - c \ � r-YYy -Y - %Y. i. r r.�hr � a, t ,,- a \Jr-.1 tom.__, : J .r ; r r ' - N.,!J jr^'£ t i .0 . ; T4,-S r r, -<r t yrt3 µ,'YK il (+ J a t ;rr.'s .y--r4l tit' . Jx -!� \ - � � )r, '�`Oszs 7 - Y - r �+`'.ik�i4{* jw"' tA� r1 r.�3�S•�rjt�W �zr3your.�a .,s.aI _ > K�,s ' y range-County o c 7 1 i - 1 I / I 0 O.0 75 - y ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION P. O. BOX 3334, A.NAHEIM. CALIF. 92803 January 12, 1981 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: Alicia W. Wentworth, City Clerk Subject: Resolution 4952 - Closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue .Thank you for notifying us in regard to Resolution 4952, intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. The Gas Company maintains facilities within the area of the proposed Closure. We have. a 2 inch gas main in Weatherly Lane located 5 feet. West of the East property line and a 4 inch gas main in Warner Avenue located 55 feet North of the Centerline of Warner at this point. These facilities provide an essential service to our customers. Location prints are attached for your reference. Should the City adopt the above resolution, we would request a :perma- nent easement be reserved over that portion of the closure -to permit our continued use and operation of our facilities. In part, this easement would require that no structure be built over or. near our facilities and that we have permanent access to our faci- lities. If you have any further questions, please contact Elaine Stark at (714) 634-3118. . Sincerely, \' J.D. Allen Technical Supervisor ES/pjg Enclosures - 2 ,l.T•� �YXu y u 1�..y��AigR�t� Wr Y•�T 4�c it _ f V� . 'IT J'�'�'I rl¢a} Y t l �+�~•`Q;`^'t•t�."'�T, 2�tr 1_i �l ,�y'..�e} '� ts 1 •4, S 1"t Y —41 Jy g Y 1ZFS'• # Y`i+P' taw��s�"F• ys?i< , sN/7/f °+'i,.; h3i5a It'tt'�?.;x.t r t , •s� � 1 11y�r� tl we t T -tY.4 �- `r. •.x .tr x� , t .. jt ti V ' t r N ty fJ-.d'0' --- Y �y 1•�kpj VP AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF CLOSURE OF WEATHERLY LANE AT WARNER AVENUE State of California) ss County of Orange ) Paul E. Cook, being duly sworn, deposes and says : That he is now and was during all the times mentioned the duly appointed, qualified and acting Street Superintendent of Huntington Beach, in said County and State. That on the 5th day of January, 1981, the City Council of said City passed its Resolution of Intention No. 4952, "A Resolution of Intention of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, " declar- ing its intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. That after adoption of said Resolution, he posted conspicuously along the street and property described in said Resolution notices of the adoption of Said Resolution and headed, "Notice of Hearing Street Closure, " one of which notices, similar to the notice posted as afore- said, is annexed hereto and made a part hereof. That he completed all the posting of said notices on the 16th day of January, 1981, and thereafter he made this affidavit and filed it with the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach. Paul LE. o_ok Street Superintendent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of January, 1981. Alicia 14. entworth City Clerk CITY OF HU TI G T N BEACH ` ' 2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Paul E. Cook Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 January 20, 1981 J. D. Allen Technical Supervisor Southern California Gas Co. Orange County Division P. 0. Box 3334 Anaheim, California .92803. Subject: Weatherly 'Lane Closure Dear Mr. Allen: Please be advised that the City is only proposing a closure of , Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue and not a vacation. Therefore, the existing street easements, including utility facilities, will remain in effect. As a result, there will be no need of reserving an easement for your facilities. If you have any questions, please contact Ralph Leyva, Traffic Engineer, or me. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Georg L. Tindall City Engineer GLT: jy cc: City Clerk R. Leyva - _..,••fit r/v_rT.�t L ��� _ ..restt- �=-20 - cowfT, S3/.f e�ot�r - 71C - xisT w•'tx ro ��rc� � � - - L-x i s r. rrid�� To • "Ie /Ya�Tlf � � COWST -2:8 I'f. _AZ OCIf' dv fL L - `� rp �t9Al'C� At%/�t►G L TD TiS�E E�4ST �,U- 1 — _—- --- — ' - :. ..- :._ '.� �, -r . -: � -..�� _-. -s ' :•.. .. • - _ . Y✓a/fir E ro -oo��9wrER E,4X.7- of 'oo" f'�44PO.:SED s'IREET CLDU�E /eiCsz' .o,V4AY1,P f sr iss yY.9 lNER. .4!/.E.*Y vE yV,f rhwAz Y !10 M-EATHERLY BAY Tract 5775 Homeowners IT LH, 4062 ALADDIN DRIVE ((� ,�5 HUNTINGTON HARBOUR August 12 , 1980 np LUI D CALIFORNIA92649 1980 Mr. - Floyd "Bud" Belsito CITY OF HUNTINGTON LEACH City Administrator ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 .Huntington Beach, California 926.48 Dear Sir : The residents of Weatherly Bay Condominiums located on the north side of Warner Avenue east of the bridge under construction ask that the Weatherly Lane temporary closure become permanent . Since Weatherly Lane was closed several years ago due to the north bridge detour , the traffic situation in this area has improved immensely. The volume has decreased , accompanied by slower speeds , and most signi= ficant the dangerous intersection of Weatherly Lane with Warner Avenue was eliminated. This two year "forced" field model has certainly been successful from the standpoint of the residents , and to-:our knowledge the City' s Police , Fire and Public Works Departments ' operations in this area have not been hampered . The closure would consist of street work in Warner Avenue and Weatherly Lane as required by the City as well as an extension of the perimeter fencing and landscaping that. presently exist along Warner Avenue. We understand that our Association would. be expected to bear thecost of the construction. It would be appreciated if you would consider our request and if you have any questions please contact Jim Nielson at 840-6640 . Very truly yours , Donald N. Miller President, Board of Governors % �r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION E V HUNTINGTON BEACH To RALPH LEVYA , TRAFFIC ENGINEERING From VIA CAPT. EKSTROM LT. PRICE Subject Date WEATHERLY BAY CONDOMINIUMS 9/2/80 IN REVIEWING THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY MR . MILLER OF THE ABOVE CONDOMINIUM �OMPLEX, I SEE NO REAL PROBLEM FROM THE TRAFFIC BUREAU S POINT OF VIEW REGARDING THE CLOSURE OF WETHERLY AT WARNER , THE EFFECT ON OUR RESPONSE TIME WOULD BE MINIMAL AT BEST. RICE, LT. TRAFFIC BUREAU COMMANDER City . of Huntington Beach - yj �'�l P.O. -BOX 180 CALIFORNIA 92648 � OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK February 3, 1981 Lee A. Branch County Recorder . P. O: Box 238 Santa Ana, CA. 92702 Enclosed please find Resolution No. 4962 and Resolution of Intent No. 4952 to be recorded as one document and returned to the Office of the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, P. 0.. Box 190, Huntington Beach,. California 92648. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IJ2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK .March 19, 1981 Southern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 3334 Anaheim, California 92803 Attn: Joyce Burger -The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure Telephone:714636-6227) i,"le ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1981 Road Commission County of Orange 400 W. 8th Street Santa Ana, CA. 92701 The City Council _of the City of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 .ordering. the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach. 'A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephono:714-53"227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 1.9, 1981 . County Sanitation Districts of Orange County County Sanitation District No. 3 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 Attn: Fred A. Harper, General The City Council of. the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:714-538-6227) 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1981 County Assessor County of Orange 630 Broadway Santa Ana, CA. 92701 The Ci.ty Council of the. C.ity of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk .AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:7144536-62271 1 , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1981 Southern California Edison Co 19171 Magnolia Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn:. H. W. Compton The City Council of the. City of Huntington Beach at its. regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:71453&6227) t .04"le CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1081 General Telephone Company 200 W. Ocean Long Beach, CA. 96865 Attn: R. C. 80003A Analyst The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:714.536.52271 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 19, 1981 W. E. St: John, County Clerk County of Orange P. 0. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA. 92711 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:714-536 6227) i, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 199 1981 Registrar of Voters Map .Section P. 0. Box 11298 Santa Ana, CA. 92711 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting field Monday, February 2, 1981 , adopted Resolution No. 4962 ordering the closure of Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A certified copy of said resolution is enclosed for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure (Telephone:714-536.6227) I City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 100 CALIFORNIA 02M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 7, 1981 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County County Sanitation District 3 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 Attn: Fred A. Harper, General Manager The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, At its regular meeting held Monday, January 5, 1981 , adopted Res. No. 4952 declaring its intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A public hearing on the proposed vacation is scheduled for the February 2, 1981 , Council meeting. We are enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 4952 for your records. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 160 CALIFORNIA 626M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 7, 1991 General Telephone Company 200 W. Ocean Long Beach, CA. 90805 .Attn: R. C. 80003A Analyst The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, _at its regular meeting held Monday, January 5, 1981 , adopted. Resolution No. 4952 declaring its intention to close Weatherly Lane. at Warner. Avenue. A public hearing on the proposed -vacation is scheduled for the February 2, 1981 , Council meeting. We are enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 4952 for your records. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure i O JA ' City of Huntington Beach P.O. .BOX 160 CALIFORNIA 62646 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 7, 1981 Southern California Edison Co. 19.171 Magnolia Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Attn: H. W. Compton The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, January 5, 1981 , adopted Res. No. 4952 declaring its intention to :close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A ppublic hearing on the proposed vacation is scheduled for the February 2, 1981 , Council meeting. We are enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 4952 for your records. mod% Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure J� City of Hut g n in� ton Beach �fT � P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92640 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 71, 1981 Road Commission County of Orange 400 W. 8th Street Santa Ana, CA. 92701 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at .its regular meeting held Monday, January 5, 1981 , adopted Res. No. 4952 declaring its intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. 'A public hearing on the proposed vacation is scheduled for the February 2, 1981 , Council meeting. We are -enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 4952 for your records. Alicia M. :Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure r J 1 Y • City of Huntington Beach P.O. ®OX 190 CALIFORNIA 62668 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 7, 1981 .So uthern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 3334 Anaheim, CA. 92803 Attn: Joyce Burger The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, January 5, 19819 adopted Res. No. 4952 declaring its intention to close Weatherly Lane at Warner Avenue. A public hearing on the proposed vacation is scheduled for the February 2, 1981 , Council Meeting. We are enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 4952 for your records. C.i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enclosure � T Q1 - rro mv too �2 0 E IN6ER ME 2 I 2 5 1 � 433 i HEII AYE 3 2 1 M Zro 3 a WARNER AVE c q 76 Z �2 SLATER AVE 1. 7 9sr TALBERT AVE ELLIS AVE i ai WIELD AVE y� g CLAY ST. 3 Z it s 4 2 JA A ORIITOWN AVE /9 S AVE 12 �`�� 8 . s INDNINAPOLIS A1"LANTA AVE OQa Z4' 21 -A i i IS N 15 17 2 D 24 p 2 L :24 p 210 EDIMEQ AVE _ a D Cp p 14 14 IS HEIL .AVE Its w N o N �P .o 210 35 34 35 37 4D 42 Na WARNER AVE (a 6 H Iz 11 1.0 SLATER AVE 19)k 21 TALBEF AVE �s14 OF 3 o II 12 14 ELLIS AVE v 25 2 v s 6MFIELD AVE c^ h CLAY SL 99 IP °Is ARKTOWN AVE uj AVE DAMS 14 to ej INDINIAPOLIS 17 . 14 o4 Ir LANTA AVE 1 - g Off' a crlb �^ tME CIA P Z4 !4 P 10 E tMGER AVE HEIL AVE 33 I 2 / 2 Mo 48 :S WARNER AVE o s 1 27 I S 9, q I Z SLATER AVE 4 srlz TALBERI AVE 3 13 38 i ELLIS AVE 2 s 2 3 Z 277 IELD AVE 2 y� ° CLAY St , a YORKTOWN AVE , 3 4 RPMS AVE ~ INDIAIIAPOl15 h' I .2 �o R 14` MANTA AVE �. �s CD %4 1(0 19 21 25 . sp 26 25 22 , EDIN6ER ME 15 17 . 19 17 17 17 1& HEIL AVE N 26 33 35 3G 40 41 38 WARNER AVE 4. a� _ Ln 0 .32. '=. 30 (� w 10 to12 14 SLATER AVE �O N 1 � CP s� �6 b Ull �2 TALBERT AVE s 3 I s ELLIS AVE Z(p .. 24 s 28 WFIELD AVE w ' y� ti CLAYST. 3 11 14 Is YORKTOWN AVE N V � Co s w 6 �14 ADAMS AVE y �� �6 W 19 W19 INDIANAPOIfS UP J4 IOWA AVE i - D o`` ILA E_ CIO P 0 EDIMER AVE 6: 3 17 34 6 4 2 14 HEIL AVE 47 3oi 3 4Z q 5'9SIT 69 WARNER AVE Z 4 1 Z . /7 SLATER AVE �o g i 2 e17 9s� 3 3 t 2 TALBERT AVE 3 Is , s jA ELLIS AVE 34 s 2 p / 2 3 22 1260FELD AVE /4 Z z �7 y� CLAY St Dgs i 1 8 YORKTOWN AVE 8 � S 7 ADAMS AVE s 4 N ��`'� s INDII�IAPOIIs z "TA AVE *a 2 - � o CA IG 22 20 27 ry+ 32 36 M 38 . 2 0 EDIMER W e � � 14. Is HEIL AVE ha U to R 3 3*b 42 10 49 .37 WARNER AVE 37 3 fe 9 1 o I2 , s 3 SLATER AVE TAL:BEIT: AVE Z s ?I S.j 17 N -4 , w /o i4 is i2 ELLIS AVE 3 c J % 0 2 9 3o N 3 WFIELD AVE N N y� CLAY sT Y�RI(TdwN AVE w N � to ADAM.S AVE N �`' INDIWPDLIS bo �� �,��• ���. .413 ,s 1 In' MTA AVE Uj - o� r- 99 EIRV rrs go% GO --� Z --� 4 !4 E 1NGER QVE 4 13 34 26 Z / o HEIL AVE 13 44 17 29 z 5 47 19 6 z ONER AVE ZG Z 44 1S S" IS, SLATER AVE I 11 ro9 Z Z Z 8 1 sf 3 / TALBERT AVE 4 i t t 49 2 3 1 1 1 ELLIS AVE IZ 3 Z o s 7 s30 WELD AVE 40 y� CLAY St . Z t 3 YORKTOWN AVE 0 r AD S AVE is N �`�• g s , rINDMAPBL,IS I ATLANTA AVE 23 O 2. D s s. y y 20 w 24 --� 2& :-♦ .34 P 35 E61AMR AVE 38 1 9 Z 38 2 ! 72 7 8 11 15 L 8 HE-IL. : AVE i3 34 19 27 95 32 g 3 33 3� 37 -4� 47 4s 3 WARNER avE .o 17 UP 2 7 .19 57 -3 �3 s p-r 1'7 SLATER AVE �' 22 22 41 , i$ 53 09 s�, 13 ! 1� z3 TALREF AVE g - ,�, ,1 40 15 !& ' 17 ELLIS AVE 9 � 3 7 2 5 a s a7 29 ea 6ARFIELD AVE 7 y,� s eLAY ST YO.RKTOWN AVE 10 Z.. ADAMS AVE i ? l 9 . 37 N �`'� INDPbtIS v "A AVE . Af AN 2 Authcinzed to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public Aotices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961, and A-24831, dated 11 June, 1963. 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Public Notice Advertising covered by this affidavit is set in 7 point with to pica column width I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of Public Nearing Notice Possible Closing of Bolsa Chica Medi n n'v"At Tasman Drive=- City of Huntington Eaach ,, PUBLIC'NEARNG NOTI;C ,. of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete t POSSIB.LE.CLOSIN.I OF copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, BOLS`d°CHIC'11� ME'DI"AN DRIVE. Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, AT T ASMAN� 3�..y - The City of Huntington Beach Transpodrt-ation Commission has Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna scheduled a public hearing to disco ssithopossbleclosingofthe OHM three Bolsa Chica median island at Ta`sman.Drive'a,,Tlie meeting is Beach issues of said newspaper for scheduled for 7:00 P.M., on March 13,;�1984 in the City Hall Chambers,2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of The Transportation Comission invites all those having an i interest in this matter to attend.A report on this matter will be presented at that time.You may call the Public works-Depart- ment at 536-5431 for further information. t Dated:3/1/84 March 3 198 4 I C ICIA M. WENTWOR BEACTY H CLERK sr` March 6 4 198 March 9 4 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 9 , 198 4 at Costa Mesa, California. to q igna ur PROOF OF PUBLICATION ny THURS'l?AY,MARCH 8,1964 t HUNTINGTON BEACH INt7EPEND�NY t '' �!cur_ � /�"�' ,,r�1►w �'".�► PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE -<,-, ','POSSIBLE CLOSING OF BOLSA CHICA MEDIAwAT , �. TASMAN DRIYE Aiifie City of Huntington Beach Transportation Commis tom. . IFn has.scheduled a public hearing to discuss the possi- , closing of the Bolaa Chica median island at Tasman Orfve. The meeting is scheduled for 7:00 P.M.,on March '13 198C.in the City Hall Council Chambers; 2000 Meirt. ;'4t;,Huntington Beach. •::The Transportation Commission Invites all Those having 6n Interest in this matter to attend,A report on.this matter will'be presented at that time. You may call the Public Works Department at 636-5431 for further intormatlon.' Dated;�11/84 , ' <. ALI&M.WENTWORTH,CITY CLERk.•`,. CITY OF.HUNTINGTON BEACH err/ -%` REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION � o S l Date October 5, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council AA Submitted by: C. W. Thcanpson, City Administrat Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Bolsa Chica Median Islam Opening at Shark Drive Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: At their October 1,` 1984 meeting, the City Council directed staff to prepare a plan and cost estimates of alternative methods for providing a left turn opening at the Shark Drive opening on Bolsa Chica.. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Refer this report to the Transportation Commission for their advice and reccm- mendati_on. (2) Reaffirm the present design of the Bolsa Chica median island which denies left turn access to Shark Drive. ANALYSIS: After comprehensive review by all staff departments including Fire Dept., Traffic Engineering, Planning and Police, the safest and most efficient design is the present configuration which prohibits left turns into Shark Drive. Bolsa Chica Street is one of the six major arterials in Huntington Beach. Presently, Bolsa Chica carries in excess of 20,000 on peak days in this area. Ultimately, when full development occurs in the years to come, sections of Bolsa Chica could carry loads of approximately 45,000 vehicles per day. It is designed therefore to carry very heavy traffic movements safely and smoothly through controlled access and elimina- tion of left turn movements. Accordingly, all the City's major arterial streets have raised median islands. In the present design, engineering-staff has provided left turn access for the commercial development at'the southeast corner of Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street, but not for Shark Drive. At the time the design was developed, staff felt that only one left turn opening between Warner and Pearce was desirable and that the commercial opening would be safer as well as provide better emergency access. The reasoning was that residential developments tend to generate more traffic during early morning and early evening peak hours than commercial develop- ments. Also, emergency response to the commercial development is from Heil Avenue which necessitates a left turn opening. At Council's direction, staff has designed as an alternative a left turn opening for Shark Drive. The design meets only minimum standards and still provides left turn access for the commercial development. The cost of the revision to the median will be about $15,000. Staff feels that the original design is preferable both for reasons of safety and for optimum traffic flaw. Residents of Huntington Riviera have a Green Street access to their development which allows safe access to Heil for freeway and residences and safe access from Warner for those returning home from the south. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Authorize a project change order for Cash Contract 606 of $15,000 to add a left turn P104/ g in the Bolsa Chica median for Shark Drive. A ' Request for Council Action Bolsa Chica Median Island opening at Shark Drive October 5, 1984 Page 2 FUNDING SOURCE: NA ATTACHMENTS: Project Map CWT:PEC:LE:jy 1� i t SHARx. � - i DRIVE - REMOVE MEDiAAl 3 PR0,�/C OPENING W17'H LEFT TURN L I LANE. AT SHARi( DRIVE. Qz I � A --i I . i ! I i y b i v SCAL E:/'WOO If I MEDIAN REV/S I j . SOL SA CH/CA A i SHARK OR T!c- � ii � ! jll 1 i 'lARPI'F, R /:`Vr l'✓UE II t REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIO c ion Date June 27, 1984 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ,,,G®U TY Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator W Public f P t Di k C l E Paul Cook, Director of ork Prepared by: P Subject: Median Closure at Bolsa Chica and Ta11sman `! Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: AP STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Transportation Commission has reviewed a public request to close the median opening on Bolsa Chica Road at Tasman Drive. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the constructing of a median closure at the intersection of Bolsa Chica and Tasman, and authorize the expenditure of $5,200 from City gas tax funds for this purpose. ANALYSIS: Several complaints from citizens living in this area prompted the Public Works Dept. to investigate their concerns. These concerns dealt mainly with the amount of non-resident traffic entering and driving through on Tasman Drive. After considerable study and investigation, the Public Works Dept. presented its findings to the City's Transportation Commission for consideration. These findings were presented to the Transportation Commission in the form of submitted petitions, radar speed surveys, manual traffic counts, machine traffic counts, time,lapse camera films, field observations and police investigation materials. These findings indicated that Tasman Drive attracted additional traffic volumes during certain periods of the day enroute to the nearby industrial park. The increases occur during the morning hours of 6 AM to 9 AM and the evening hours of 3 PM to 5 PM. Public input for this issue was received at several regularly scheduled Transportation Commission meetings and at a public hearing. Based on all comments received, the Transportation Commission directed staff to install a test period median closure and perform an "after" study of the area. .The after study found that motorists were still using Tasman as a passageway to the industrial park during these certain periods of the day. The Commission then directed staff to install restrictive signs which would prohibit left turns into Tasman during these periods and report the results of that action. That study indicated that the amount of motorists using Tasman had been reduced. This condition was also supported by results furnished by the City's Police Department. However, even with these results, public comment and complaints were still being registered by some local residents. During the regularly scheduled June, 1984 Transportation Commission meeting, the Commission decided that a median closure at this location was appropriate. The closure will totally eliminate all left turns into and out of Tasman Drive. FUNDING SOURCE: Gas tax funds budgeted in account 740630 (Misc. St. Imps.). 0168g P10 4/81 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Continue enforcement of restrictions already established. 2. Refer to Transportation Commission for alternate solution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Transportation Commission RTCA CWT:PEC:KH:jy C11 f OF : -ILJNTINGTaN BEACH.. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R4wi.o� 3-1-79 BO LS A o, N N~ N N N N yl yl n n 10 O N yt IV • ya yl N N �N 15011-15061 15081-1::3 1•�12t � .. 1 1 I / � - ' ^to N N N N U1 h N N N M N N N N - N N �+ 15112 „ f1 151�! CEANUS 15141-15171 15161-15191 ^ „ U1 W o N Y1 n M N N N N 015192- - Q 15191- f 15222 5071- 15221 E 15162 15201 5081- O 5091- 5101- ~5151-5181 (n 5121 - 3P. n �v X n 5471.. t Vf /I N N N N M 549i . ARGOSY 5082-5142 5182-5242 5262-5322 $352-5272 5392-5412 5422-5454 5462-5480-5492�}n 15292 l 5 3:J7 1536 o 1532 -IL SMAN DR. °� 1 � N N N - 3S3 f .. V r u34 BUSINESS cacst g 15352 15351 5352 15351 15352 N' i 15362 15361 15362 15361 15362 GA AY CR. 15372 15371 15372 15371TOM 68SSt I c 15382 15381 Z 15382 15361 N JS SS 15192 15191 U. 15392 15391 t=SST c v I o N 1 1540I 1540115402 1540 15402 �+! COMMERCIAL. t� f? 15422 54 r 15421 15422 '^ w N 1P CASPIAN Ck z tc►ss x ac x e� Q 15432 1s431 Q 1543 ry N N N n NIda15442 .� u44 LK42 tc►GF- 1S4S2 t_41511 6' 4 Z Q ►' r p"p' iv f Si JS ,7S 9 9 IT .A 1~n 1'i 2 i -' — - Mc FADDEN . i REQUEST FOR TRtANSPORTATION COI h ISSION AC T I0I�� _i'.�Y 7, 1984 Submitted to: Transportation Commission Date Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public G%brks Prepared by: Bruce Gi]mer, Traffic Engineer Subject Tasman Drive at Bolsa Chica Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachmenis: Statement of Issue: Three alternative options regarding the intersection of Tasman Drive -at Bolsa Chica Street are to be considered: 1. Continue enforcement restrictions already established. 2. Construct additional island restriction, creating a "shadowed" turnir:_; pocket into Tasman and eliminating left turns out onto Bolsa Chico !i-,a : Tasman Drive. 3. Construct .median closure, eliminating all left turns into and out of Tasman. Recommendation: . Adopt Option No. 1, continuation of existing restrictions, with a status rc,per'- returned to the Commission at its November meeting. Analysis: The intersection of Bolsa Chica Street at Tasman Drive was recently -,odi'iet b7 the installation of restrictions on the hours during which left turns into Tas—mman Dri`�e can be made, i.e. turns are prohibited. 5-9 A.M. and 3-5.P.M. daily except Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Enforcement activity in the area has shou,;n that few violati:c..;ns are taking place. Results of a manual count taken Monday morning (5-7-84) between 6 .and 9 A.M.. are attached. As part of the actions taken on this matter, the timing of the traffic signal at McFadden and Bolsa Chica was modified. . Traffic turning left.onto McFadden and from McFadden onto Bolsa Chica now experiences less delay than before the chai:ge. The signal now cycles more rapidly, servicing the various movements more efficien..tly. Option No. 1 can be.considered a. "null" alternative, that is, do nothing further. The field reviews and films indicate that the effect of the actions already taken has been to eliminate all but a few intrusions into this residential area daring the hours of restriction. Furthermore, trips thru the area during other Dimes of the day are also few in number. Access for residents onto and from Bolsa Chica is preserved. Continued enforcement on a. "spot check" basis will retain a high level of compliance to the restrictions imposed. Option No. 2 consists of the construction of a "left turn in-onl,;" median island for south bound Bolsa Chica traffic. This option would eliminate left turns frc,: Tasman onto Bolsa Chica. Depending upon the geometry of the new construcc:ic"n, Request for Transportation Commission Action Tasman Drive at Bolsa Chica May 7, 1984 Page 2 turning vehicles will be required to slow to a low speed to make the turning movement. Vehicles determined to violate the restrictions already in place would not be detered by this configuration. Trucks could not use the turn pocket due to its geometry. A minimum cost project would require approximately $1,200 for construction. Benefits could be defined as: Eliminate 'truck turns of all kinds. . Slaw turning vehicles more than normally is done.. No betterment of the existing condition relative to illegal turning vehicles uou'L be realized. Option No. 3 would completely close the existing median to any vehicular traffic. Traffic normally using this opening into Tasman would be .forced to McFadden to make a U-turn and return, or make'a left turn and gain access via And bman or Cambay, thus adding traffic to those streets.. Turns onto Bolsa Chica south bound would also have to be made at the McFadden intersection. A t~_inimum cost project to accomplish this closure would require approximately $5,500 for con- struction. Transfer of trips onto the other local residential streets in tie s tract is an undesirable result of Option No. 3. Upon performing a benefit cost analysis, it -is clear that,'furtlzer eYpe .ditures cannot be justified on the basis of substantial improvement in cor_dit.ions or accident reduction. The proponents of. the full closure option feel that any intrusion into the residential area is unwarranted and that an obligation to totally eliminate it rests with the City. That is not the case. Steps to reasonably eliminate such intrusion without placing undue hardship or incon- venience on other road users more closely describes the local goverlients obligation. The data gathered since the turning restrictions were i:-mposed indicates that such restrictions have been effective. Option ho. 1 has tare= fore been recommended. . Alternative Actions: 1. Choose either option 2 or Option 3 and recommend their construction. . 2. Consider an option not described here. Funding Source: None required for the recommended action. PEC:BHG:lw y Bolsa Chica aL. Tasman Turning .7ements SUBJEC._ FB 6:00 AM to 9:00 Al 8 JEF DATE 5-7-84 GC NO. lO. Bolsa Chica Southbound U. Turn 20 Bolsa Chica Southbound Lett Turn 3O. Tasman Westbound Left Turn 4O. Tasman Westbound Right. Turn I I Ti.Tne End.inq Ol 20 6:15 RM 11 10 1 I. 6 6:30 RM 0 0 1. 4 6.45I-M -t--1) �` 3 7:00 AM 0 7:15 AM 1 1 0 9 C 7:30 AM 2 i 1 ! 1 6 7:45 AM 3 0 1 6 8..0 0 Am 7. 0 7 .8:15 AM. 5 0 0 3 8:30 AM 2 0 0 4 8:45 AM 2 0 1 4 9s00 AM 1 —1 0— 4 Totals 24 5 6 71 ti CHKD.BY DATE Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all-kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961, and A-24831, dated 11 June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Public Notice Advertising covered by this affi davit Is set in 7 point with 10 pica column width. I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to-or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, " County of Orange; State of-California, and that a f Public Hearing Nat � _.- P B '.PUBLIC NOTICE fnedian at Tasman Drive PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE N POSSIBLE CLOSING-OF COMMISBOLSA CHIC,A MEDIAN of which copy attached hereto is a true and complet AT TASMAN DRIVE ,The City of Huntington Beach copy, was printed and published.in the Costa Mesa, Transportation 'Commission has. scheduled a public.hearing,to'dis- Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, cuss the'possible closing of the BoisaIrvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Tasman C Drive, 'median island. at. Tasman .Drive. The meeting is ; �� three scheduled for 7:00 P:M.,on March:' Beach issues of said newspaper for 13, 1984, in the City Hall Council Chambers,2000 main Street;Hunt- consecutive weeks to wit the issu S The of in Beach. ° The Transporation'Commission invites all those having an interest`in this matter to attend. A report on this matter will be presented at that time.You may call the Public Works March 3 4 Departrnent,at 536-5431 for.further 198 information., Dated:March 1, 1984" ALICIA-M. WENTWORTH,. CITY March 6 4 :CLERK 19$ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . Published Orange Coast Daily,-Pilot March 9 4 March 3,6,% 1984' 1260-84 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 9 , 198 4 I at Costa Mesa, California. Signature I �l f PROOF OF PUBLICATION t ej IN THE superior coax OF THE In-iiid for the County cf Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH9 CITY CLERK PP0OF OF PLBUCA,noN Public Hearin Ste. of California ) "-PU9LICffl6J GNOTICE Co_,my of Orange POSSIBLE CLOSING OF . BOLSA CHICA MEDIAN AT RTA J. RIC�i ER TASMAN DRIVE The City of Huntington Beach Trans- portation Commission has scheduled a i^at I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of I public hearing to discuss.the possible the -%nits closing of the lsa Chica median island d States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I at Tasman Drive.The meeting is ached- am not a party to, nor interested in the above entitled matter;. uled for 7:00 P.M.,on March 13,1984,in the City Hall Council Chambers, 2000 tha.1 am the principal clerk-of the printer of the Main Street,Huntington Beach. -The Transportation Coin fission in- IT vitas all those having an interest in this HU+f 1 I N G TO N BEACH' I ND. R EV I E'�1 � matter to attend.A report on this matter will be presented at t time.You may a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of j call the Public Works Department at 536- f 5431 for further information. :UNTINGTON BEACH Dated:3/1/84{_ ALICAIM.W NTWORTH CITCo-minty of Orange and which newspaper is published for the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i Pub:March 8,1984, clis?mination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- Hunt.Beach Ind.Rev.#35693 ter_ and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had ar.d still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, a-nc which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- lis •:-d at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a pe.-ic,rl exceeding one year; that th; notice, of which the an=axed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular anc entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement- thereof,on the following dates,to wit: �- March 89 1984 I certify (or declare) under penalty of parjury that the forego- in ,tn.e and correct. D_rd at..................GARDE`, GROVE .......................... 84 Cali=ornia,this �Qth...dayof Ma.rCh..19........ Rita J. Richter ....................................................... Signature ----� r ems- . REQUES'k FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION st- Date December"ll 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council / Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, City Administra �'. Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works r � .Subject: Temporary Closure of Park & Pine Streets at Utica A /� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, en s: STATI ENI' OF ISSUE: A public hearing was held by the Transportation Commission on: Dec. 8, . 1941 to determine the feasibility of installing a temporary closure of Park and Pine at Utica for the purpose of studying its effects. RECOMMENDATION: The Transportation Commission, on a vote of .4 to 1, recommends to the.City Council. that Park and Pine be closed for a period of 60 days to determine if the closure will achieve the desired effects. Such closure to be accomplished by using construction barricades after the school holiday recess. ANALYSIS: All the residents (approximately 70) living between Lake Street and Main Street from Utica to Springfield were sent a letter of notification regarding the.:intended closures and the date, time and place of the public hearing. Twenty-four persons spoke to the Commission indicating their.views regarding the closure. Fourteen.people were in'-.opposition to the closure, eight were in support of the closures and two people, including Ted.Bartlett, offered suggestions or asked questions. In addition, eleven persons called the traffic engineering section to state:.they could not attend the meeting, but were opposed to the closure. Three persons, including Mrs. Oldfield, called in with opposing viewpoints. Although the Commission was inclined to think that the closures were not cost effective or might be detrimental to the-general public, it was willing to recommend a temporary closure as a means of obtaining additional data and allow a trial process. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Rescind Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6D. FUNDING SOURCE: If the temporary-closure is approved, it could be accomplished through existing operating accounts. Should the permanent closure be implemented, the cost would be funded fron gas tax funds or an assessment district of the residents living on Park and on Pine Streets. ATTACHMENTS: RTCA Backup Material CWT:PEC:RRL:Jy 1 P10 4/81 REEQUEST FOR TF__.jVSPORTATION COM� SION ACTION Date December 4 , 1981 Submitted to: Transportation Commission Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Prepared by: Ralph R. Leyva, Traffic Engineer Subject Temporary Closure of Park and Pine Streets at Utica Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source, Alternative;Actions,Attachments: Statement of Issue: In 1977, the City Council approved the closure of Park and Pine Streets . The closure of these streets has been deferred pending the realignment of Yorktown which has recently been completed. At the Council meeting of August 17, 1981, this matter was referred to the Transportation Commission for recommendation. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Transportation Commission hold a public hearing to determine the feasibility of installing a temporary closure of Park and Pine at Utica and direct the staff to study the effectiveness of the clo- sure. Analysis : Residents living immediately south of the Civic Center along P-ark and Pine Streets have for several years raised their concerns with the nuisance problems associated with. high school students driving and parking adjacent to their homes. One of the solutions to minimize this problem involved the cul-de-sacing of Park and Pine at Utica Avenue. This concept was approved by the adoption of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6D. In order to determine if the closure of these two streets will solve the problems voiced by residents of the area, a temporary closure utilizing barricades is recommended. The temporary closure, if approved, should be implemented after the reopening of school following the holiday recess . Alternatives : Recommend to the Planning Commission and City Council that Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6D be recinded. Funding Source: No funding required for interim closure. Attachments : Map -- -�«r�,PEC:RRL: lw Y' PARK AND PINE STREET CLOSURES Attached is a brief report identifying the major advantages and disadvantages of the project. One advantage not mentioned in this report is the possibility that the cul-de-sacs would discourage the parking of vehicles on Park and Pine. Since pedestrian access cannot be restricted at Utica from Park or Pine, it is questionable that the cul-de-sacs would significantly reduce parking by high school students. They would certainly eliminate any traffic generated by the high school students if that traffic had ever existed before. The traffic count taken in 1977 indicated that less than 300 vehicles use Park or Pine south of Utica. A count taken October 27, 1980 indicted an ADT of 263 for Park and an ADT of 322 for Pine Street. The higher count on Pine Street is prot)ably due to the detour on Lake Street for north bound traffic at Springfield. ADVANTAGES .I. In the future, the areas north of Utica between Main Street and Lake Street are scheduled to be developed as residential. housing. If this is to be the case, the proposed cul-de-sacs would provide the residents with certain advantages. One major benefit would be the elimination of all through traffic. Furthermore, through traffic on all surrounding streets will be reduced in conjunction with the cul-de-sacs. With the reduction in through traffic, the pedestrian safety levels in theareaare anticipated to rise. 2. The proposed cul-de-sacs will aid in reducing vehicular traffic which currently travels on Utica. This condition will be further enhanced by the existing cul-de-sac at Seventeenth Street at Yorktown. Furthermore, it is assumed that most of the traffic which will travel on Utica will be through traffic and not inter-area traffic. 3. Existing pedestrian volumes on Utica show that Utica is heavily used by students attending Huntington Beach High School. As many as 378 pedestrians use the section of Utica from Main Street fo Florida Street during the school season on an average weekday. If Park and Pine were to be cul-de-soced, the amount of vehicular traffic will be reduced and will help provide these pedestrians with added safety. It is still undetermined at this time but as far as early calculations'go; the closures would reduce vehicular travel on Utica by as much as 15%. Pedestrians will have a safer route to travel because of the flow reductions. PARK AND PINE STREET CLOSURES Page Two 4. Traffic which normally travels north on Pine and Park to.get to Utica would have to start traveling north on Main Street and Lake Street to Utica and Yorktown to head east.. This is a desired condition because the streets of Main . and Lake are designed to handle these loads and can accommodate future loads. The streets of Park and Pine are not designed or intended to handle loads of these types. DISADVANTAGES I. One of the most predominate negative factors about the proposed cul-de-sacs is that Park and Pine will not provide access to Utica. Utica is intended to carry . a large load of traffic heading east to the new Newland Center. Traffic will have to reroute to other streets and additional sums of energy will be spent. The amounts of energy spent would be small but would exist just the same. Also, Pine Street provides direct access into the civic center parking facilities. This access would be omitted by the closures. 2. Another disadvantage to these closures is the time and money spent to complete the cul-de-sacs. It is estimated that it would cost approximately $40,000.00 to construct the cul-de-sacs. This figure does not include R/W acquisitions. One of the major areas left unaddressed, concerning the closures is the parking situations. Currently, Park and Pine, north of Springfield, are being used by high school students as an overflow parking facility. When the dirt school parking lot is full or flooded, students revert to parking on the surrounding side streets. These overflow vehicles have created disturbances among the residents. In the future, the existing dirt school parking lot is scheduled to be replaced by a fully paved parking lot. This lot will be located south of Utica and west of Main Street. The parking lot is scheduled to accommodate all of the Huntington Beach High School parking demands. PARK AND PINE STREET CLOSURES Page Three The implementation of said parking lot will definitely affect and adjust all existing related parking problems on Park and Pine Streets. The proposed lot is planned to eliminate'all overflow parking conditions. Students currently parking on these streets will be able to utilize the paved lot. Therefore, the only vehicles parking on Park and Pine Streets will be surrounding resident cars. One remaining question for this topic concerns the police and fire dep&rtments response times. With the closing of.Park and Pine Streets at Utica the existing response times will increase in some cases. If the responding unit is south of Springfield there will be no change or addition to the existing response time this is not the case when the responding unit is north of Springfield or north of Utica. The unit now has to divert back down to Springfield to enter onto Park or Pine Street. Although the response times will increase slightly, it is something which needs to be reviewed. It is important to point out at this time that approximately 80% of all reported complaints dealt in one way or another with the problems of students parking on Park or Pine Street. Some of the related problems received were for racing, trash, noise, disturbances, fender benders and others. A brief comment concerning accidentsjover the past three (3) years a total of only four (4) accidents have occurred on these two sheets in the study area. There were two on Pine and two on Park Street. One of these accidents was a fixed object accident. In brief, the cul-de-sacs would provide many advantages to the proposed residential homes which will eventually be located in this area. One question concerning this matter is if the City should spend the money now or wait and have the developer db the construction as part of the housing project. The closures will also lighten the load on Park and Pine Streets south of. Springfield. In addition, pedestrians will be-able to travel on Utica with higher safety levels than before. KH:de . vzcr U7ICA f-YEA.�PORARY CLOSU w ;mow L _ < L SPRINGFIELDF771" F-iF --]- - .f F77IF71 Scale I"='(1(1' . e Precise Plan of Strcct Alipirncnt 7 6-GI) NCw(IM,IC*-6f K H c HUNTINGTON BEACH nt-.NNIKG APT. �y u CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i • 2000 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Paul E. Cook Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 • November 18, 1981 1 Resident 1816 Park Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Resident: At the regular scheduled City Council meeting on August 17, 1981, the City Council directed an action to the Transportation Commission to review and study the feasibility of a temporary closure of Park and Pine Streets at Utica, and that the subject be returned to City Council with a recommendation. In lieu of the conditions mentioned above, the Transportation Commission has scheduled a public hearing for 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 8, 1981. This hearing will be part of the regular scheduled agenda for the Commission and will be held in Room B-7. If you wish to attend and express your opinions, this is your opportunity. If you have any questions concerning these matters, please feel free to contact Ralph R. Leyva at (714) 536-5525 or Karl H.Huy at (714) 536-5443. Very truly yours, Paul E. Cook (� Director, Public Works tit '. PEC:KHH:dp kt fly 4-" a- January 269 1981 Sandra Oldfield ' 1816 Park Street Huntington Beach, . Ca. -92648 Mayor and City Councilpersons Civic Center Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Dear Mayor and City Councilpersons, 1 am writing in regard to a serious annoyance problem in my neighborhood, due primarily to the city closure of 17th Street. I have lived in the 1800 *Topic of Park Street for twenty-one years and never has the problem been as arr.c.;inT as the past few monthg since the closing of 17th Street. ilintincton Leach High School' students use our block as their private ?ar::i-;: lot, hot rod traffic corridor and general recreational lounge area at all hours of the school day beginning at 7:05 A.m. when I'm still trying to s' ::p: :'^enever we catch the youngsters depositing their lunch trash on cur la.:ns or ;,atheri n,f to smoke who knows what, a, neighbor calls the school ar.-I the administrators try to keep the students "flushed out" — but on a one at a ti,-ne basis it 's a losing battle. In 19','8 when my husband and I purchased this nroperty, we paid 257 more t:har, a similar lot on Main Street to get off the traffic Corr. idor and stay in N zonin.g on a quiet residential street. Now, I fpel these interlopers are I infrinf.ing on my rights to peace and privacy and I won 't standstill for it.' How would you like to carry groceries and large bulky packages an- extra half ! block because your residential street is being used for a high school parking 1'ot, and you can 't park near your own house? I have some suggestions to remedy this problem. First, allow parking both sides of the closed 17th Street.(AdditionPl 2nd level parking could be f added for civic center narking if necessary, though there has always been ` plenty of available parking whenever I've been there.) Second, encourage student parking (via .school announcements by administrators) on the new Yorktown corridor when it opens. Third, open more parking spaces on Yorktown west of Main Street outside the Seacliff Center and along 17th Street behind ` the present 11.B.H.S. lot. Forth, close Utica Street just east of 17th Street with a curb-or wall to prohibit through traffic from the high school campus, making Utica Street accessible from Lake Street. Fifth, make a cul-de-sac at the end of Park and Pine Streets with a curb and wall. Although this measure would be somewhat awkward in terms of getting in and out of our block for the residents, it would be no worse than most housing tracts and would, I feel, discourage intruders from disrupting our neighborhood. There are many super young people at the high school. I know because' I 've done volunteer work there a lot of years, but there are also many unthinki- ing, uncaring youngsters there too, who receive little or no supervision or discipline and have no-respect for the rights of others. Perhaps you people . or the high school administrators have other ideas to 'remedy our situation. In any case I expect to hear from you in the near future that- the problems will be solved in one way or another. /Thank you for your co-operation Mrs. Sandra Oldfield 9%. W. 7: '17 vj--m 0-J-v r%.q. -e We, the undersigned property owners of Park Street,*.agree with Sandra'. Oldfieldlo letter to the Mayor and Couficilpersons dated January 26, 19SIe %14e17 12 / .o -3 PCL - 4 I j �� it G�- ANk REQUES f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION s4,,O� Date August 11, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratof Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works ' Subject: Temporary Closure of Park and Pine Streets at Utica Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding;Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE:- In 1977 the City Council approved the closure of Park and Pine Streets. The closure of these streets has been deferred pending the realignment of Yorktown which has recently been completed. With the upcoming school year approaching, now would be an opportune time to determine the effectiveness of the proposed closure by utilizing barricades for an interim test period. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the installation of a temporary closure of Park and Pine Streets at Utica and direct the staff to study the effectiveness of the closure. ANALYSIS: Residents living immediately south of the Civic Center along Park and Pine Streets have for several years raised their concerns with the nuisance problems associated with High School students driving and parking adjacent to their homes. One of the solutions to minimize this problem involved the cul-de-sacing of Park and Pine at Utica Avenue. This concept was approved by the adoption of Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6D. In order to determine if the closure of these two streets will solve the problems voiced by residents of the area, a temporary closure utilizing barricades is recommended. The temporary closure, if approved, should be implemented prior to the reopening of school this September. ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve recommendation. . �--- ---- - - FUNDING SOURCE: REFERRED No funding quired for interim closure. BY COUNCIL � - . , D�ruSi67� ATTACHMENTS: T0: -ri^/YNS Jr-f-/r`�t. Map ............................I......_.... G C4 1S o CWT:PEC:GLT: jy G , �A Ai 1 PIO 4/81 w �w� oe Cn UTICA f-TENP,ORARY- CLOSURE • ww 5 w SPRINGFIELD F77IF771 F771 F Scale 1"=200' • Precise Plan of Street Alicnment 76-61) HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. z t� f N9 REQ _ T FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Submitted by Paul E. Cooke Department Public Works Date Prepared January 23 fig 81 Backup Material Attached Q Yes No-- Subject Closure of Taylor Street at Paaw Lane City Administrator's Comments APP$O-rED By CITY cow4cm CITY'CITY CL Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: / Statement of Issue: The closure of Taylor Street at Pammy Lane was approved with the adoption of Plan of. Street Alignment No. 73-1 and later included as part of the Taylor and Beach Specific Plan. Re- cently the Planning Commission and sane residents have requested the closure be implemented -as soon as possible. ReccmTendation: Authorize the use of interim measures%,to close Taylor Street isYn�ediately-east of. Panuy Lane per the attached drawing and direct the staff to study the effects of the closure .in six months. Discussion: The closure of Taylor Street west of Beach Blvd. was originally approved by the adoption of PPSA 73-1 which primarily looked at street circulation patterns in the area. The purpose of the closure was to separate industrial traffic generated from properties north of Taylor from existing residential neighborhoods to the south, and also to eliminate traffic problems stemming from the two nearby auto dealers. PPSA 73-1 was later included into the Taylor and Beach Specific Plan which was adopted in October, 1973. This Specific Plan was later.re- vised (in 1978) to reflect changes in zoning of properties north of Taylor Street from manufacturing to residential. The Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their Jan. 20, 1981 meeting. Mr. Ron Russel, representing the Five Point Haneowners Association, appeared before the Commission request- ing an immediate closure of Taylor Street. The Commission concurred, concluding that, since Ellis Ave. is now opened to Gothard Street, Taylor Street should be closed in accordance with Taylor and Beach Specific Plan. Staff would recommend that an interim closure be considered andthat a traffic study be con- ducted in 6 months to -determine'-the impacts of the -closure. The interim closure (refer to the attached drawing) would consist of guardrail barricades, two box trees and necessary signing. Cost for this type of closure is estimated to cost between $2,000 to $3,000. Alternatives: ' 1. Approve a permanent closure at an estimated cost of $10,000 to $15,0.00. 2. Do not close Taylor St. at this time and direct the staff to study other alternatives to reduce the traffic problems generated by the auto dealers. Funding Source: Gas Tax. /'�' PEC:GLT:jy CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Paul Cook, Director From James W. Palin, Director Public Works Development Services Subject TAYLOR STREET CLOSURE Date January 26, 1981 Pursuant to your request, your communication on the subject matter was posted on the January 20, .1981 Planning Commission agenda for discussion. After a .lengthy review of the past history of the problem by Mr. Ron. Russell, former Planning Commissioner, and a description of the diffi- culties the. neighborhood has experienced because of the loading and unloading of vehicles, the penetration of the residential area by employees of the automobile agencies using the tract streets for parking their own cars and the mechanical testing of agency cars, truck traffic from the Five Points shopping center, and beach-goers using the tract streets as a short cut from the north, the Planning Commission concurred with past action on closure and recommended that the City pursue appropriations in this forthcoming budget for a permanent solution. This would require closure of Taylor by the previously designed cul-de- sacs approved by the Taylor Street Specific Plan. This action took place on a motion by Greer, seconded by Kenefick, which passed by the following vote: Ayes: Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Greer Noes: None Absent: Schumacher, Bauer stain: Bannister you have additional questions on this action, please do not hesitate o contact me. IP:df CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HI INIINGTON BEACH To Mr. Porter, Chairman From George L. Tindall Planning Commission City Engineer Subject proposed Closure of Taylor Dr. Date . December 16, 1980 at Pammy Lane (Resubmitted January 20, 1981) The Planning Commission on several occasions has inquired as to the status of the proposed closure .of Taylor Drive west of Beach Blvd. in the vicinity of Pammy Lane. Commissioner Greer has indicated that the closure was to take place upon the completion of the Ellis Ave. bridge, which opened Ellis St. between Gothard and Main Street. To specifically answer to Commission' s question, there are no funds currently budgeted for this project. The estimated cost to permanently close Taylor Drive, including landscaping, is projected to be $10 , 000. A temporary closure could be implemented for- approximately $3, 000 . Implementation of the closure at this time would require a budget appropriation by the City Council. Upon reviewing the files to learn the past history and reasons for this closure, the Public Works Department is of the opinion that .the matter should be restudied. The closure was apparently originally approved by the adoption of Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 73-1 which primarily looked at the street circulation problems for the (then) industrially zoned property between Taylor and Talbert. The purpose of the closure was to separate the industrial traffic generated from properties north of Taylor from the existing residential neigh- borhood, and also to eliminate reported- problems stemming from the two auto dealers at Taylor Dr. and Beach Blvd. PPSA 73-1 was later (Oct 1973) incorporated into the Taylor and Beach Specific Plan. A copy of this plan is attached to this report for the Commission' s information. This Precise Plan was modified in 1978 to reflect changes in zoning of properties north of Taylor from manufacturing to residential. It is recommended. that the Precise Plan of Street Alignment for Taylor Drive be restudied by the Development Services and Public Works Department considering the current circulation needs for the area. GLT: jy NOTE: THE 1972 TAYLOR-BEACH SPECIFIC PLAN WAS Attach. DISTRIBUTED TO THE COMMISSION. ON DECEMBER 16 , cc: Paul Cook 1980 Jim Palin SUB: . HUMM ron uACH BY . T DATE Z 3 CC NO. - .. A 5 . �C /a vim:'_' S�c,.v Nor 4 T�f�D4�Gr/ 5T NX ST�rv,E,,kcf/7-H CY4w. I I I /c,,e o vlo c CHKD.BY DATE SHEET NO. OF .�. UIA� ` REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION _ nS Date April 10 , 1981 Submitted to: Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator v /� 1Z 'Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, _ Director of Public Work i Subject: . Taylor Avenue Closure ��& Backup Material Attached: [x]Yes [ ]No Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: The City Council ordered the temporary closure of Taylor Avenue east of Pammy Lane in order to assess the impacts and the reaction of the public affected by that closure. ,Recomiiicndation It is recomioended that Taylor Ave. remain open.to public-access and that_-the-existing 'barricades and traffic restrictions be removed. It -is further recomlendau tnat the 1-specific plan for Taylor St. be amended to show it as a through street. - ---- -- - - - Analysis: A short time after the barricades were. installed_, a petition with 42 signatures was received by the City requesting that Taylor Avenue be reopened. Telephone calls received by traffic engineering are running more than 4 to 1 against the closure. Most of the opposition to the closure appears to be coming from new residents living north of Taylor and west of Pammy Lane. Some of the .residents who originally supported the closure in 1976 have apparently moved out of the area or now feel the closure should be removed. With the price of owning and operating a vehicle increasing almost on a monthly basis, the motoring public is now more sensitive to delays, increased travel distances,. obstructions to free flow and other traffic related factors. In this situation, it appears to the .public (and the staff) that there are greater benefits to increasing the freedom of movement than to restricting that movement. Alternative Actions: There appears to be no alternative solutions to this problem. Taylor Avenue should be either closed or opened to traffic at the boundary between the residential and commercial districts. Funding Source: There is no additional funding required to implement the recommended action. PEC:RRL: jy PIO 3/81 DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT TAYLOR AVENUE CLOSURE PREPARED BY : KARL H . Huy APRIL 10, 1981 UNDER SUPERVISION OF : R, K, LEYVA TRAFFIC ENGINEER TAYLOR CLOSURE -The Taylor Avenue closure has caused mixed feelings and opinions ' among the residents affected by the measure . The objective of the report is to examine, explain and discuss the findings of the field observations , field. data, and calculations . It will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of omitting the closure. It was found through calculations , observations and other works that the closure should be removed as soon as 'possible for reasons which J. will be discussed subsequently in this. report. One of the areas analyzed extensively had to do with the amount of excessive travel time caused by the closure . This travel time is experienced by almost every motorist in the residential tract en- compassed in the study area. One of the residents spoke to stated, "It ' s a large burden to drive all the way around the housing tract to get out onto Beach Boulevard and other major arterials: " Because . of the closure, no vehicles can exit onto Beach Boulevard by way of Taylor. Motorists are currently having to travel down Huntington Street . and Delaware Street to Ellis Avenue and then onto Beach Boulevard. All of this rerouting causes vehicles to travel longer distances. Consequently, larger sums of energy are being spent because of the closure. Vehicles are using more gasoline to get. onto Beach Boulevard now than they did before the closure. There are also other items- -" -. which are :adversely affected by the closure. Such items affected are tire wear, vehicle maintenance and roadway maintenance. These items may be slightly affected, but are contributors just the same. Based on calculations, it was found that the additional distances traveled could result in expenditures of .$35 ,000 to $65,000 per year for the motorists of the area. The study area in.:question is defined as the area extending south to Ellis Avenue, north to Taylor Avenue, west to Carnaby Lane, and east to Beach Boulevard. It is important to point out that the total dollars which were derived were low estimates . This total could range as high as $120 ,000 per year . It was assumed all vehicles were in fair to good condition, all roads were in the best condition -possible , good weather conditions, conservative drivers, and other such factors. Another area which was investigated had to deal with the additional trips which are generated by the closure . Surveys and calculations- have shown that certain access points into the housing tracts are generating large numbers of trips. Some - of the intersections are experiencing approximately a 30 to .40 percent increase in trips gener- ated. Some of the intersections which are experiencing the largest increase is Ellis at Main. These- increases are primarily a result of the opening under the railroad located east of Gothard. The traffic signal at Goldenwest and Ellis has also facilitated the .use of Ellis Avenue . Before the closure was installed, all the access points into the housing tract were generating- traffic volumes which were sufficient for their type of design. The distribution of all incoming. and outgoing traffic from the housing tract was distributed between four access points . With the installation, traffic is being divided upon three access points . Because of this condition, the three generators are operating at below acceptable levels . With all the rerouting of traffic to the remaing three access points, internal traffic is diverting south to exit onto Ellis. The motorists are having to travel south on residential streets . This is not a new situation, but is a condition which has become undesirable. Before the installation, internal traffic had a choice of heading north to exit onto Taylor or heading south to exit onto Ellis . With the motor- ists heading north or south, the -internal traffic was- divided fairly evenly. Each of -the internal streets were handling a small amount of exiting traffic. Because of the closure, all streets in the tract are now handling larger sums of motorists . * Some of the streets are operating a higher levels because of this situation. Currently, the tract is occupied by approximately 300 homes . Based on the Huntington Beach Special Census of January 22 , 1979, this averages out to about 1, 026. persons living in this housing tract. Out of these 1 , 026 persons, approximately 374 are ' school bound children. These children are having to travel along the internal streets to get to school. With the increase of vehicular traffic on these streets , a conflict will eventually reach undesirable levels. The pedestrian/vehicle conflict is a subject which is causing a major concern among residents'. Certain intersections generate lare amounts of pedestrian traffic in the morning and in the afternoon hours. Because of the closure, the large pedestrian generating intersections are also the largest vehicular generating intersections . Because of the above mentioned conditions, it is most likely that it is only a matter of time before a pedestrian accident occurs at one of these. locations . This is unfortunate, but is only imminent because of the Taylor closure. It ' is fe.lt that if. the Taylor,..closure_ was­re=, opened, traffic would..•._once -again:.be; distr:ib:uted evenly. With evenly distributed traff, the pedestrian/vehicular conflict would be reduced to a minimum. The volumes of the existing intersections will, in turn, drop and begin to operate at a higher level of servi-ce:`" One method of the evaluating and determining an intersection' s level of service or efficiency level is known as the intersection Capacity Analysis . This procedure enables us to rate how well an intersection is operating. This method takes into consideration many- factors which are pertinent to an intersection' s operation. - Some of these factors are -as follows.: 1 . Geometric design, 2 . Street widths 3. Grade of slope 4 . Striping layout 5 . Truck operations 6 . Entering traffic volumes 7 . Sight distances -2- Based on counts which were conducted before the closure, (February 21 , 1981 - February 22 , 1981) most of the intersections which were analyzed were operating at levels A, B, and C. It is important to point out that an intersection is hoped to be operating at the highest level of service , A. The intersection which was operating at a lesser level of service was Main at Ellis. This intersection was subject to delay only during the p.m. peak hours They ranged from 5 second to as- high as 135 seconds. It was found that most of the southern area intersections had a decrease in their level of service rating. Some of the internal intersections did not increase or decrease because of the closure. This is understandable because of the fact that most traffic would not head north to get out of the tract because of the closure. Some of the intersections experienced a rise in volumes per day as high as 400 vehicles. The amount of delay at some of the intersections increased because of the associated problem of the closure. The intersection of Main and Ellis found to be operating poorly because of the closure . Motorists are using Ellis to exit out of their tract and subsequently larger volumes are experienced on Ellis . Because of the large volumes, the affected intersections are decreasing in their level of service ratings. Delays at these major intersections are increasing at a rate which is unnecessary. All of these problems can be reduced considerably if the closure was omitted and traffic resumed normal practices . It should be noted that the intersection of Main and Ellis is slated for a traffic signal installation in the near future. This installation is hoped to improve most of the traffic related problems which are currently experienced at this location. It should also be noted that Beach and Taylor is on a list. of traffic signals to be installed in the future by Caltrans . It is recommended that the City remove the closure as soon as possible . The public will benefit -in more ways than _expected with its removal . The traffic patterns of motorists will once again become normal and safety conditions will once again be at levels which are acceptable. The removal will also relieve the already troublesome load experienced at Ellis and Main and will help provide smooth progression in the area. The advantage of retaining the closure ;(at the boundary between the residence district and the commercial district) is that the traffic generated by the auto dealers in testing vehicles will be eliminated from the residential neighborhood. One home on the north side of Taylor Avenue, east of Pammy Lane, will no longer experience an average daily traffic of 1375 vehicles per day. -3- • a' CITY OF. 3 HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Revi"d 3.-1-79 L�ERT !92 '07 r IH07t` 18032 ($H P. CNTR.) 37 I8061 18062 a w Recommended; w IHmli �19092 clOSUre barricade location if. Naylor Avenue closure is approved iH10H BI -18141 1821; Existing closure._ GROTH barricade loca'tl.onl -- CHEVROLET TAYLOR D 1R251 , N N N N N N N N N "IN N N N N N N N a r m m o "+ •"+ �+ 0 r a, O .+ N n N .0 r 18252 1Htti1 1826 .n v+ v3 �n .0 .0 10 .0 .o n r n r h r r 18252 18251 Z . z r r r r r N r r n n r r n r n r r r r 18281 J 1829 ~°n v�r m o •, • + . 16262 18261 _1 1d262 ry n ✓+ .n N n 0 ,o r �i �- �0 .0 '0 .0 -.0 .0 .0 r r r 18t91 h `� r n r r n n r r r r F r 16272 18271 18272 18301 ONTARIO DR 18292 18291 18292 WILSON 18J12 ry N N N N N N N ry N N ry ry 18302 18301 18302 FORD 18311 f N o $ e Z 8312 18311 18322 r r r r n r n r r r J 18312 18311 18312 18321 8322 18321 18331 vp r0 a on 8342 1R341 18322 18321 18322 r r r r n r r n r r h 16255 18351 n 0 U E B EC DR 18342 18341 18342 CANTON R. r �/� 8352 18351 - l.i\tY tlJtV 18352 1.F.]31 18J61 N N N N ry .N N N N N ry 8362 18361 18352 18351 — -—_ - �^ �^ ^ � � $ r0 � o 18362 18361 18362 18351 18371 r` n r n r r n r r r r r P h 8372 8371 18372 18371 18372 18391 16391 1839 1840 'D lo 'A o .�+ 8382 18381 18361 r r r r r r r 18401 16402 1840 8402 1841 r Q 8392 1839 8382 18381 18382 NA LN B EN RTA N N DR 18379 18411 812 8412 8 10 18192 18391 1839218411 1842 18 18421 18422 8422 I l lo � 1841 8402 18401 '� 18402 - 1842] 1843 Z r r r n h 6422 Q 19431 18432 16432 0 IL 8421 18423y 18431 Q 842 16412 18411 1B412 8425 18423 1844 ,I� v 184 27 18441 [D 16442 W 1- v h r r n r h r 184 RA NK LI N DR 18441 n- 1845 Z 844 18451 Z 18452 18451 Q le452 F Y U KON D R.' 1e44 12. N No ,� N N ^ z 18432 18455 18461 Q 18462 C7 18462 1846 ? ry n N r N m N 18451 18442 r m �' p � h� hW J 18442 18461 18471 V 18472 Cn Q�• _ h n n ^ ^ 1846 r g gg p 1846 APQ�.GB W ° 1R427 18182 n r r r N N 1A h r h h � h r ..-. 292 �C 311191Z4 ill A)9 b- 3 \A-1 _gv-t-' lz`ttab3�_ °. JIc t : fro k119 ZL- 5c" ee - '/. ..__ 0 7/� - z c REQUES r FOR CITY COUNCIL-- ACTION . os 3-re tier Date June 26, 19 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator. APPRUVED BY CITY COUNCIL Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works 194- Subject: Closure of Harbour Lane - - CITY . RK Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: C (` STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The City Council approved the. concept of closing Harbour Lane to through traffic on April 6, 1981 but directed that the specific type of closure be brought back to the City Council for approval. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the installation of two twelve foot gates by the Christiana Bay Homeowner's Association on the north end of Harbour Lane at Fisher Drive. 2. Authorize the placement of barricades at the north end of Harbour Lane as a temporary closure until the permanent closure can be constructed. ANALYSIS: AtAt t�he�r meeting..of, April 61 1981, the City Council considered a petition from the resi- dents of Harbour Lane requesting that the street be.closed to through traffic. The City Council approved this request but directed that-the specific type of closure be brought back to the City Council for approval. Staff has been working with representatives of the Christiana Bay-Homeowner's Association since April to determine the most effective method of closing Harbour Lane while still allowing access by fire vehicles in an emergency. The attached sketch depicting two 12 foot wide, four foot high gates between pilasters is the type of closure recommended by staff and the Homeowmer's Association. These gates will prevent automobiles and trucks from using. Harbour Lane as a through street but will not prevent pedestrians or bicyclists from using the street. The gates will be constructed so that the Fire Department can open them if emergency access is needed. A "Not a Through Street" sign will be installed at the south end of Harbour Lane. Since the construction of these gates will require 60 to 90 days, the Homeowner'•s .Abso ciation has requested that temporary barricades be installed in the meantime at the north end of the street in order to isnpMment-the closure as soon as_possible. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Do not approve the installation of gates at the north end of Harbour Lane. 2. Do not approve the closure of Harbour Lane to through traffic. FUNDING SOURCE: No City funds are involved in this project except the nominal cost of placing and removing temporary barricades. The Christiana Bay Hzer's Association will pay the total cost of the construction of the gates. A'ITACEV]EN!'S: / Location Map 111 p1 i , Ak 10 1 U ��` - PARK XA27.1 t,77- 1. e 101061 Q MONTEREY rl 162R6 162R1 -1 16291 Z 16292 16291 .- u z vi is v ✓ b~ i �~ v .. HUMBOLT DR. , 6 TENNIS_ ESTATES r LOCATION MAP •; .ati r � I b FI HER b 1640 ; 0 0 641 .: Z n J W HEIL CHRISTIANA BAY 0 m a . DR HARBOR VIEW SCHOOL: 27 ' STAR ^ _ PARK. (4343 PICKWICK) o r _ �+ N 1a601 J r• ,� •�. 11I1 - o PICKWICK CR. w �a Ir,621 �, w � •, m ': � ', �.-.. Z n 1$E•A_�SAFCSUl1A". BRANFORD .. �'�\ 1 '� Q�"'• �''' �- , „ ., " II(L',1 11,6•: Ir.l,• � .r .•k or {r. 1��, P �_—_•� clrJl)ICR. 145 w w HARBOR I�.hi: Illlll -w LIGHTS smw MAY 11.711 ,• f r' FIGnRO C« rlp .: f 11.14/ 1a141 ,� ':o• '� w r, r. ^ , Yd - 11 r•� � A w �• rrrw � - ' L J ,6u1� =i Ib/LI -DALE DR. -p - 11.17I _. >,• 1,, � ' f i yrr+ ;fin r'3: ». 5 r��!'ti�' ,., •,'`,,, 4 -y 1 See Sheet .: S 20 _O Q Q: �vh - ri _ t cQ.N y:o� LOT --- _ - 4 J Cons t. S.M I4 0 NZA_ QA� 8` VC.P Sew r �a5 f3�OB.(o/ "90 6_iV--L-- --- t +--- ----,;- 0�f:' /fir - --- -- - ------ = _ 6 c f Ik c .L -- - -- a 3 COT 3 � �1+ , tj � COA Consf 6"c 2 Cons Si-, 3 Cons t 4'° i 4 % Cons t 4' CUP Ve DA TA 5 Const. .-5't ' OVA\- REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date April 10 , 1981 Submitted to: Mayor and City Council �C�- Submitted by: Charles; Thompson-, City Administrator 1 Prepared by: Paul E. Cook , Director of Publc Works Subject: Closure of Santa Barbara Lane Backup Material Attached: [X]Yes [ ]No !//�wlol NV Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: The City has received a petition with 44 signatures and several letters requesting that this street be closed to through traffic at Edinger Avenue. Recommendation: 1`. It is :rec eded .that� Santa.Barbara Lane remain open to -the public at both ends of the street. 2. It is recommended that selective enforcement be increased on Santa Barbara Lane. Analysis: Santa Barbara is approximately 1825 feet long and extends diagonally in a southeasterly direction from Edinger Avenue and connects to Saybrook about 1325. feet south of Edinger Avenue. There is a double yellow center line along the entire .length and both ends of the street are controlled by stop signs. (See-Exhibit A) . There are no 25 mph speed limit signs since the area is a "residence-li.district" as difined in Section 515 of the California Vehicle Code. The prima-facie speed limit in a residence district is 25 mph. The radar speed survey shows an 85th percentil of 34 mph which is higher than the 85th percentile for other residential streets. Approximately 72% of the motorists driving on Santa Barbara Lane are exceeding the speed limit (See Exhibit B) . A total of 10 accidents over a 3 year period has generated concern among residents living along Santa Barbara Lane. The Collision Diagram (Exhibit C) indicates an accident pattern at both ends of the street. There were 4 accidents at the north end and 6 accidents at the southeasterly terminus of the street. Two accidents occurred at the intersection of Saybrook and Santa Barbara. The predominant classification of accident was the type which involved a vehicle striking a fixed object. The closure of the street at the north end would eliminate approximately 1500 vehicle . trips using that intersection. About 1000 trips are in the southbound direction while 500 are in the northbound direction (See Exhibit D) . The southeasterly end of the street is experiencing about 1830 vehicle trips per-day. Since the 45 residential units which take access from Santa Barbara are generating about 14 trips per unit for a total aver- age daily traffic (ADT) of 630 trips, it appears that Santa Barbara is experiencing considerable "through traffic. This through traffic apparently is using Santa Barbara as a short-cut to and from the area near the westerly terminus of Edinger Avenue. If one end of Santa Barbara is closed, the additional distance traveled will cost the travelling public about $10,000 per year based on an average cost of 23 cents per mile. l PIO 3/81 Request for •Council. Action Closure of Santa Barbara Lane Page 2. April 10', 1981 Since speed combined with some instances of intoxication are the primary factors contributing to the reported accidents, the closure is not expected to reduce the - total number of accidents. It will, however, relocate the location of some of the accidents to other parts of the street system. r Alternatives: Exhibit & shows a partial closure at the north:end_.of,Santa"?.Bdrbara_which. would restrict movements to right-turn egress' only. Left-turns in or out would be pro- hibited if not impossible. Right-turns into Santa Barbara would also be eliminated. Such a partial closure would satisfy the Fire Department's concern.while eliminatng all trips except an estimated 250 right turns per day. Funding Source: There is no Capital Outlay for the recommended action. If the City Council wishes to approve a partial closure, it is recommended that residents taking access from Santa Barbara assume all costs for construction and engineering. The estimated cost is $17,500. PEC:RRL:ek EXHIBIT A VI. CINI-TY. MA-P . ' Se T ' 0 16021 - 16011 16041 I f,OS I I6071 r _ z I�;py1 r 1�091 SCHOOL SITE N Z 1• h�� wti 6,q /� 1 (v Z PAR K m ..• ,O h1N� 616�h �� 1iti4 CJ� n �� or, 6�6 y 1 Z r o L N Ir b~ b b b~ 1621( b� b1b y 16261 ti 16282 16271 Q 1fi272 1627�F-'=(�_ - �' 16286 J 16282 lUJ f �p �,287 16281 C 16281 vv 16292 A� v� 1'`1, r 16702 16291 Q 16292 16291 Lli �> v o n 16712 ry � OV DR. N i 1 �h O �- 1 �C)ti - ��, 6j9 r-- FISHER DR 1640 ~ 641 ` J Z J � A � 64112 i49 _ HEIL SPEED SURVEY A A A A jr-, A AO (P (J+ 6) 6) 6D v 3 ONWAp6pj � N w A wo O w A (p V OD A CSC (P (o O - N w A 0ve s : c ' C ; C i Zj , O c . z c rn. LOCATIONs 'd. ,�wu-,y. � � � °��- '�. ( ���11�_����C'?�::� SAM!'L E SIZE PRESENT SPEED LIMIT — _ DAT E _ 85th °/°ile �s`"s, �' ! r 71ME 1 : PH 77Z -I:oo=11� 10 M PH PACE_ TO BY °!° !N PACI� �._ c —r Y O ON EXHIBIT C— • DEF�ITti(Ef\(T cry(= PUBLICORKS r 'I T RAFFIC DIVISION ` - COLLISION DIAGRAM LOCA-rION � h. E5 > DATE �COMPILED o -off -8f R'4m ( !kJ. CU!I nc �' K—) F kOM ►- 1--70 - 1-0 4 ! _g' - F T7P PPI- fpfG . . l F Lh N ' ?-13-78 PAC' _. .. - . I - APPROACH TURN_ _ __ _ HEAD-ON_ _ _ _.- _ - _ __ ._r r— Tied E ___ - - - _A A M. P• P M BACnING +VfO70R VEHICLE_ _ _ - f —s., PARKED VEHICLE_ - - - _Ej PAVEIAEIIT _ _ _D= 0RY I-ICY W wET PATH OF MOVrNG MOTOR VEHICLE__ _. FIXED OBJECT- - - - - - -0 WEATHER- _ _-C- CLEAR F• FOC Y _ PE DESTRIAN .PATH _ _� OVERTURNED_ _ _ _ _ __ �� R �-RAIN 5- SLEET _- _ _ _ _ _ FATAL - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 OUT OF CONTROL- NON -FATAL - - - - - - - - O .. SIDESWIPE REAR. END - -- - - -- - - :- BICYCLE •r ACCIDENT _ SUNMIARr DAYLIGHT f11GHT TOTALS CLA55IFICAT1pN L3'( TYPCs FATAL `ATA YJN` PP^OP' T17TAL FATAL NON. 9^�U TOTAL FATAL F�IgL DA A7TAL r APPROACHING AT RIGHT ANGLE5 APPROACHIIIG SAME OIRECTIOf.15 APNIIOACHINr OPFO51T E DIRECTIONS _ PEDEST I'd a11 ACCIDENTS , BICYCLE ACCIDENTS LEFT TURN FIXED OBJECT OTHER AGCIDENT5-0l/ F U� TOTALS 8 2 i G HOUR' COUNT 21 LATTL% �� COU.IT a` LOCATION ��...lT/'� � i_ :.L'.�:: .;__ DATE OF COUNT o� '(�„ 0 _pd r,). i a4 - EDI _. EXHIBIT- D HOUR END roc 1 JD 1 %�t.w;�, -..,>(�-I �� ��. / ` r/ T/ )!_� -�. lam 4 6 0 7 10 rj_ i. 12 ( r� - 1 m 4 , ! A J � G 5 `7 . 07 J w` .4010 !i 12 TOTAL4 ( I i I 178 j } FBSUBJECT -' CL_ __` ZZZ eE-4-/ —s A'-Y--BRQO� -gv -s'y--DATE::4- /9 CC-NO. -- HUMnNGM BEACH I i I � II II I i I �2 I i! jII � _ ,t-N, ova— _ I � i T.AGL— 17— L XZST ._.S�AIVOf��6�T S_TO��;_. `. � i i II `•v � i —I��L$T�IGL--- _TtaN''-- I Ll 1 i I I I . I i � I _- Q 40 I' 1'1 I I•. I I i ' -Y_is k-I - --- I CHKD.BY DATE SHEET NO. OF 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LJ J 2) kl��" INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Paul Cook From Raymond C. Picar Director, Public Works Fire Chief Subject REQUEST FOR CLOSURE OF Date March 30, 1981 SANTA BARBARA LANE AT EDINGER TO THROUGH TRAFFIC This communication is in response to a letter received by Mayor Ruth Bailey pertaining to the closure of Santa Barbara Lane at Edinger to through traffic. Santa Barbara Lane is an 1,800 foot long street that is accessed off of Edinger to the north and Saybrook Lane to the east. Three cul-de-sac streets tie into Santa Barbara and general property access is only from the street side as most of the homes are bounded by one of the Huntington Harbour channels. This department recommends against the complete closure of the street from a public safety standpoint. The fire problem is such that both strategic and tactical objects can best be met by providing access from two directions. However, the department does not object to the adoption of special features that may redirect or limit traffic and encourage through traffic to access the area via either Edinger or Saybrook. If further information is desired, please advise. RCP:dp cc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Chief Kelly, Fire Marshal Jim Palin, Development Services .Jeri Chenelle, Administrative Analyst , BY.s:l_ DATE GC NO. HUNTINGTON NAa+ C.vbT. . , ` / _ rl�r�pR,.gtT� � -�E'!fI(j �.ta'� L�-�/Y'1 p �A iY - `s/ ��r-./• ,b 2 : c.ycrn-T�o�, 1-SO GG-cja0r oe" 3.. ov CpwST 0 -/. .Cule45. 7 �(JT7CYL 21b l'/t. IS 21p � tC U $ �9-s /�r/ Lr �ZiC )e o.S'. - I 1 _• L rr 5 G•a'p C c.�/���, ,vIcLc�s S Ile_ i7op I c .a,�x� �vc•�ST/kZ16 _ Sl►+s�Pru��1 S O L• wH�YSc, too L•F. ORS `ice 1 �o L•F. 4~ W N vre D?�L yc,w i 3 S—o l.�r-• J Z%Lbw) y boo CHKD.BY DATE SHEET NO. OF order to doC�an►Q _ `r case ( for closing San rb tr- t6 . thr.0 tea-ffic) .✓ 't the City .Coun6t1l _ ting April 6 ( 1 :101 pl.ea.: . fi`] .1 out below and op in the :rt61' l:bax ;-.,t either 1E201 :'>antn' Barbara or 16O(,,1 Santa Barbar!+.. Dig into your memory &- .list -any accident or property d;3 rnape that: has happened to you or your guests. We also need the rnlmt),�r- of children. living here and endangered, by' high spe od traffic. Pi,F.ASE return this information before April-6 so. the data earn be tsebu.l.�+t��d . Adl vur° ----------------- --- ------ --- G NAM +T E ADDRESS l.�L NUMBER OF CN.TLDRFN,. �", ' `. _ AGES- 0-5 yrs. 6-10 yrs 11-15 yrs 16-20 •yrs ACCTDENTS. :;PROPEPTY DAMAGE. . . GIVE DATFS VAC Vm 7�e t4 C) �7(Nv�) L rN, I .GA r c �.{�,�Q� t.1 Q►, r;,') r 1....Ir t_ r�''°�. C. '1�'.... � r �� 4�t ��N ,G •,�. yam%? "y" G--rn �� .�: •-�ems*-.—.•:,�-�• ` t _ � < --ram �•:.-:�'C�� -�COO- JM C Jl� VvJU �- c ct. r' L�i� �- CQ-tea-- C Lc:�-�---CJ�. �-�-� _.�._? ��.�� .��" �y C�'L..� j�'�c�•_(`-�`--� In order to doq�imp Tit% case ( for clos i nv,, ,iro 81% , !),r, t thru traffic ) : City Council.. meeting Aprii 6 -3 r) p 1.e a P,c? 411 ) 1 o1vt h e.ow ind drop in the -mailbox at either 16201 ..rjrt .i Barbara or 1(j)t", F;- tita '13,arbari . ' Dig into .yourmemory & list st arty accident or property dam.-im, that has happened to you or your guests. We at,--It) need the rmml'� r of ch-i Wren Aanerered.. by' high 151%er�d traffic.Jiving here and et PiA return this information before April 6 so the data can be tabulat(:d . - ------------------------------------ -- NAME/4�� ADDRESS /I Mlwl NUMBER OF CHILDREN AGES 0-5 yrs. 6-10 yrs. 11-15 yrs 16-20 yrs. ACCIDENTS. —PROPERTY DAMAGE. . . GIVE DATES > z2z/j 1411'S ;i yIn order to docrmnnt .- tY ra traff_ 1C)case ( for clo in� SantagW1rto � 1% at the City Council. meeting Ap.ri1 6 ( 7 : J0) please f"i1.1 out helow and drop in the mailbox at either 162,01 ;antra Barbara or 1'=„)61 �urnta 'B- rbara . Dig into your memory & list any accident. or property d;imarre that has happened to . you or your guests, We a l_.r;(� nE� - d the r,umhrr• o C : Ft i l.d rc-n living here and end�xngered by high speed tr,affic. Pi;!;A: return this information before April 6 so the data can be tabul_�it,7,a . ----------------------------------- NAME �R2 II ADDRESS l I 7�� NUMBER OF CHTLDR.EN AGES 0-5 yrs. 6--10 yrs. 11=.1ti yrs 16- 10 vrs. ACCIDENTS. . . PROPERTY DAMAGE,. . . GTVE DATES ' ... N�N,,�Sia;���✓NG /�'�S .�)C� <L2�`�'"�� - �l A C:_�.:J��,��K> v_-L�—' �.s.��,�'.�_��.�s��:Sr"- L< �1S ✓�CL�7 iS��E jl `�l/�i ��Il <'� a'c ._ ✓� '��c�s�__��1'�c�X�2-�� n .Y-----L r` In*order to document. %case ( for clos'tnp antalib,;_r-) tc• thr•u traffic) at ,the ,City Council. meeting April 6 ( 'I : 10) please fill out below ,end drop in the mailbox at el.ther 16201 rantri Barbara or 1 F,()r,1 S, it 'Barbar. . ' Dig into your memory & list ary acci don t or property d-,mag(--% that has happened to you or your guests. We also need the numhor• of children living here and enda.rj�ered by' high speed traffic. Pi-EASE' return this � information before April 6 so the data can be tabulated . ----------------------------------- N A ME ADDRESS NUMBER OF CHILDREN AGES 0-5 yrs. 6-10 yrs. 11-15 yrs 16-21) vr-s. ACCIDENTS. . . PROPERTY DA.MAGE. . . GIVE DATFS `S D M *'`-,� 1 j r-L� N �/C�1 S T f7C=✓1 C--klr/, . �-�T Ova Gi U�;SAS (L - 41yP � J D ;" ' i3 J t/7 - ZOO /C� /�v� 7'� J�G�.-y !o%----'�-c.2_�C:r---`?-•�`-�=_=-Si__�E'�'i __.__ �'�._�4-2�- o - za /�fin-. • � ,� lY�i- , J , ;n orderto '.documPA%r- case ( for closing San rbara to thru traffic) the �it`y Council meeti.n April. 6 ( 7: 30) please fill out below and 'f drop ir. the mailbox at dither 16201 Santa Barbara. -or 16061 Santa Barbara. [?ig into your memory & List any accident or property damage - that has happened to you or your. gueF,ts. We also need the number of children Iivin 7 here arid. endangered by � hi gh speed traffic. P1:FASE return this inform-`ti.on before April. 6 so the data can be tabulated. ------ ----------------------------- NAME _1 �� _ JY-60 1i2 — A D D R ES, NUMBER OF CHILDREN AGES 0-5 yrs. 6-10 yrs. 11-15 yrs 16-2d yrs } 2— 4 �_ # ACCIDF VP , . rR.0PEVTY DAMAGE:. . . GIVF, DATES kuv ,u In= rder to docl.imf�n! of ase ( for rlos *in€., tY,ru tr.' C: at the City Council meeting April 6 p) ea se i-,(-,Iow -end drop in the mai I box at either 162n1 , 0j. , a bA rb3 Dig into your memory & list any or propprly that has happened to .you or your guests. We also need the of children' living here and endDrj�ered by ' hi -h speed traffic. Fi.1-.A return information befor-(--- April 6 so the data -;;:in be tabu-1--it�.1" . ----------------------------------- <77 NAME Uhl-, I(_ --b -, I ADDRESS NUMBER OF CHTLI)PEN AGF, 0-5 yrs. 0-10 yrs . 11 -15 \-r,,, 1 ") ")0 r1 ram. —2 C� ACCIDENTS, . .PROPERTY DAMAGE'. . . GIVE DATE:; �T- L J-1 Chu— - 001 OcKa -t) T. In order to document case ( for clo,,;i.n;,-- ':,art taW*'t "-!.-j t.n thru tr a ff i C 1 0 '7 : V)) pJ eare f 11 out be! at' -the City Council mpeti.np APH ow and drop in the mailbox t either 16201 Barbara or 160"1 Santa 'Barbara . Dig into your memory & list any a o n cci.dt or property d,-imafthat has happened to . you or your gue!-,ts. We al.no need the rmff)h'�T' (11' Child?',en' living here and endangered. by high sp(.-!,-,d traffic. Pi_�:A.SJE return this information before April. 6 so the data c;--in be- tabulatf.-d . ---------- ------------------------- NAME ADDRESS _141SI -,_fZ,_1754 NUMBER OF CHTI;DREN 0-� yrs 0-10 yrs. 11-15 yrs 16-,10 Yrs. ACCIDENTS—PROPERTY DAMAGF. . . C,T V F: D YP F S, 03 Alt <57 ,0AP17 ou e x6,Z eF a 44,6 ye, T /V A 4 7 W 4- Z�0171-J 71JC-11c Us AIS12,E 7 AE lVe' ,OASS has A-- 7-;IS Sy T/j,6- j7-/ In order to document, of se for closins- Anta t thru traff. c. ) the City Council meetinp April 6 please f; I r),,it- ',,,P.Iow and drop in the mailbox at either 16201 Barbara or 160or- 1 it- 'Barba YA Dig into your merviory & list any acci &,,nt or property tlh,-it has happened to you or your guests. We also need the riumhor of chi I d ren' living here and endangered by� high spend traffic. 1 A S:�: return this -information before April 6 so the data can be tabulat,,-J . ----------------------------------- NAME ADDRESS 0 NUMBER OF CHTLDREN � AGES 0-5 yrs. 6-10 yrs. 11 -1r: yrs 16-4`0 yrs. ACCTDENT5. . . PR0PEIPTY DAMAGE. . . G I V F DATE?:', 4:2d-22L In 5rder io, do,&ardent qur case (for closing Santa - -?arba.r- ' to" thrt txa�atfic) at the City Council n ting April 6 ( 7 : 30) plea fill out below and ,drop ire the mailbox at either 16201 Sant:) Barbara or 1F061 Santa;.'Barbara. " Li& into ` y6urx� memory `& list any accident or property damage that' has happened t&.you or your guests. We also need the number of children' living,fiere., and endangered, by•' high spef d traffic. Pi-EASE return this inf6rmatiort„before April 6 so the data can he tabulatl:d. i tit 'A> �` ,•i r j, NUMBER ''tJF lHllr i2FN ,� AGES 0-5 yrs. 6-10 'yrs. 11-15 yrs 1.6-20 °. 4} .. 7 # 4„ # a OTROP�RT•Y ,DAMAGE.. . . GIVE DATFS �✓� ";o, . rr7,1, 'r�f�! iE.y ,G/ST�o ,r,�ELoet� rv.F✓ay= vuE TAr v�J�rTe�,�o�r .c..� -, ,,7'r/'.,,d/,�.�'�ti.¢`,�°'�,: '� t�.,. ?'o /S/�6n?/A�•� Ts/�' �u.�v�' ,�T' �,:V..v �'s$is,.�<s►°Tss' Ali t � •9�i''� 4 s„ I/�<//CLE`.GD.ei���0�if/TO � /�E: d9f' C,/To-,i�,9�m � . • ,',f��',d° ^�.d :.:+����,,r�:;�::,/�i,2y� /'�'s9.,t�'.G'EO l!�J�G' ��!�a�v�.Eo T��.s�"••,��`",J6-6' c.-/%�'�.�/ /✓��' 7 . �'' i' ::�''`1f'�; 'ai .5/.d!. '' ,�39•�9i4ef To �7'J� vim+/ems 6s; ". .�!.•�s;%� r.' ,;' .LJQiv,�r/V �Y �"6•�I.�JG6 /��%1.E�s/v�.Ro°. /✓ t✓d.; o J.7' W,=i ;r v vWAI .2% 6�/./9t s d s�.E?�'y++I� /G •'1 •�.1dt�' 4.d4eeHT dpm LTi .9.uO !2/.ydc �"llv:,:r`.� tcl�°ito ' t'►sf� v.+ ;� ,.. :,r�,.*,,,n���Y.i �%'`:,.!f'''.�.��'OdI�L'y/tl'S✓�/N.� /y.�. �G.9/c�.w- .8��, 7 --r• ?�-r• .�S/�� , :, /.^.�.r^".A/s'�C'!J '/N:✓I.y.�,'cdd'Ds✓I(//P� o'Y�/<? SJ"siPS�N� f�'�.s�IS/7.L1��lJ �"�.�'��"��'�µl.'4/�.%�'::?.r,4"/�'�jr' . i'r.1/GJr�?: a9QL'7"47 ` ''"0r-` G'vFe?�✓C<� ,O.t��vE•t� ,E3y/�fIGF /�i6�f `�.'►�,,c ":a"�'sv�.�.r..F ' ` '` � .�9.w.0 fJ�/y"�9/�o�isroC..�CO n<J�=',�'� 5:!:'�'/=?'G/�"a/.rI"j�J.c.a'* t,i'+• , d/re.�,Eo fy �, c��„oc.r�., ,�> i►�- /ice � rsi��•r: 75 ;N, sa.' T.L/�HT po<E 41..4J ToTa9 4t :✓ ,G =.sT�'o�' �d', ;-�yr f e�',c u ey �ti/fJ3s%!to--4eX rP7,4G 40 /,�isi4 �Tx>,Uiv�%dJC .vf>Jw.AdE lr..�S G�dN� Tcr/sv.P, ' LP6J9,/i.Q�'.5 G-"s�,,�'��' �"LJf':ttioL,G/�/DN/�N� 1/a'� �,s9GL/N1�`S_j�'Lr�G/16d"P' i"'c•�tds t 7o /wwx--E S vc o CeAjg. -,!7A o,0 w-rlv7 d 00� ' �.. ... oA67 OF /1.23°�"; i3oy d/�/.t✓G.9 T oj� f1a•6ia:�'':'r�`i�R✓b��E /�evo i�efla To ,tJivE /�/To T/fE G•Oiv©.•�z®�.a/��" �c� 7wew /w, Y/<� f'.•q ,rEv /�✓ �J 'o i,. � /�/.�,i�'?fs�9J!���' jo ©�OT/f 1�.�'h/®�`G 6.�; IJ.E'✓v�".L" L�07 :. ',�f�r.��C �'��"�'r��o 9.•�!® JPGPO/�rEO /.v�eoFti�'- Tc mod/C�, „ 4 ,.j 'FMB t( . "'•i '..,.:. , , ° , f I "I"nJCN TO CLOS ANTA BARBARA LANE TO THR ►, ? k'FkG J'agP �!;�JN- ,.. ADDRESS DATE 272 4 - F C l?t ' � =f� Vogl .-�; Y• lv _may /!1 ,rf �� REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL CTION °s ,a a arch 30 , 1981 Submitted to: Mayor & City Council Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: Paul E . Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Petition :for closure of Harbour Lane. Backup Material Attached: [Xl Yes [ ]No t9'� Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: A petition has been submitted to the City to close one end of Harbour Lane. Recommendation: The staff recommends that the entire length of Harbour Lane remain open to the public. Analysis: Christiana Bay Homeowner's Association contend .that motorists- living nearby are using Harbour Lane as a means of by passing the intersection of Saybrook and Heil which- is controlled by a three-way stop. Members- of the Association report that many instances of speeding and two recent accidents at Harbour Lane and Morning Star are reasons for the petition. Some members are concerned that this activity will result in a serious .accid..ent=-invoiving-.a:.Iocal-:resident. Traffic volume studies indicate that about 66 vehicles per day Cfor a 2-day average) travel northbound on Harbour Lane and that about 217 vehicles travel southbound during the same 24- hour period. Total volume ,on Harbour adds up to about 283 vehicles per day which is less than the expected traffic that would be generated by the .nunber of dwelling units on that street. There are 30 units which- have driveways connecting directly to Harbour on the west side. The 32 units which are on the east side of Harbour take access from an alley which connects to Fisher on the northbund:Morning Star on the south. Using standard traffic generation rates for residential -units, it would be ex- nected that over 300 vehicles per day would use Harbour Lane. Our traffic counts in- dicate that the number of vehicles using Harbour to bypass the intersection at Heil and Saybrook is very insignificant. A vehicle speed survey taken January 19, 1981 between the hours of 3:45 pm and 5:45.pm indicated an 85th. percentile of 29. mph.. This speed is slightly less than the 31 to 32 mph normally found to be the 85th percentile in other residential areas. Undoubtably, there are instances of higher speeds during the night hours of the weekend and other times. Complaints of speed and screeching tires is a typical complaint from most residential areas .of the City. On Harbour Lane, past com- plaints have generated a painted center line and stop signs at both ends of the street. The Fire Department is opposed to the closing of either end of Harbour Lane since that could result in a 778 feet Cul-de-sac with no means of turning equipment around. If a closure is approved by the City Council, the Fire Department.reconanends that the closure be constructed at the north end (Fisher Ave.) and that an island have 12 feet minimum gates to meet Fire Department requirements. PIO 3/81 Request for City Council Action Subject: Closure of Harbour Lane March 27, 1981 Page 2. The Police Department indicates that response time could be increased by a closure at either end. They also indicate that burglary activity increases on streets which have lack of patrol by marked police units. Members of the Tennis Estates have stated that burglary activity in that development is higher than within the Christiana Bay Develop- ment. Alternatives: Approve the closure at the south end as requested by the Association or the north end as preferred by the Fire Department. The closure design should be "approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments. Funding All costs of the closure, including engineering and permits, should be assumed by the Christiana Bay Homecxnmer's Association and no costs should be assessed to the Public. PEC:RRL:ek a z aoz 4041 G2 �� a 402 Cyq� 1640>1 a� s�j �e� 4032 4042 D 404 4051 p 403 40524052 4061 L509N 1,r• 405 51 y5 4062 4061 n7 071 .^6� 4071 Z7 o a072 ' v N N N - Q »0?24071 _ 4081 0 o m m c9: ti 105 - - _ 4092 lit �• E 4091 •� 13�`vv� r D S 4101 Z c r6 sr_ L N. 4111 D r9r p = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CD 4111 4112 (f) 4121 co D m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D 4121 4122 D 4131 D Is1616`'S rsa - _ - - - -1 4131 4132S4N - - - - - - p :1:1 4151 �- ----- --- -- - -- C(�c� LN. O 4142 " - 1625 16235 . ENT 2 f 4151 41 -� r------- - - - 1171 C 4`�1 .4152 �,�1 a15 Sl 415= 2 4162 gl - 1624 R. ' 1 �1.� ..61 41� 4jb!;. 41;2 s 416 416` -2 \lql. i rn `' 26245 - �'y.il 41'2 41,1 4132 i1;1 41�2 314181 418271 •-41z � MANDAI AY~) CR. Z 41�11 4152 2 4151 0.19) 2 %L 418 4192 191 m 41g1 41g2 ilglol 42�2 \211 \1g2p2 44201 4202 HARBOUR LN � •i M (/� ; 4211 N N N 26�Ss 7�C 2 p201 02 42 4212 422 4 4221 a rn a 626j \2 221 4222 12 a231 m 42�1 421'- 4211 g222 )1 . � , Q 4` � 4231 4232 � g222 4221 4212 422- ` 4,3` � q24 4232 �.. - .._ }2 4231 q2}2 a23 q2,Z L N. . q2 4241 g242 � 4241 42 42 e251 \152" D Y 5 a2S'- ^ 4261 AO 261 4161 �j 7C �- z 4271 4261�P.���V" qN LN. m c� cu 0A v n o Ln A - cn C7 -4 m 0 `° 0 c� 0. fig; r PLANNING ZONING DM 23 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 20 -5 - II °°° SCAL[ IN f[CT NOTE: V F ALL OW ENSIONS ARE IN rEET CITY 01 ADOPTED DECEMER S,1960 �N N ZONE RIGHT ON TE ANY gTHE °r TE TO E%TEND TO TNC C[NT T. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.-804 or such°Rlcgr or w•r LEGEND AMENDED ORD.N0. AMENDED ORD.N0. O I FRC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH 6-4-62 907 5-I6-66 1210 OE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT6- : 978 7-18-66 1228 COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT 133 7-24- 3 3 IDOT 12-5-66 1269 CZ— FgONT YARD SETBACK LINE -2-64 1o4l 3-6-67 1304 ® LIMITED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AMENDED ORDN0. 4-6-64 1045 9-IB-67 1349 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 15-726 96 "" 4-4-64 1054 12-18-66 1373 CL Two FAMILY RESIDENCE DISFRIC 5-4-64 1054 iI-IB-69 1451 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 1-7-80 2402 S-IB-64 D56 2-17-69 1471 © COMM Y COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 247,292,367,398,403,410,415,425,434,406,459;460,478,66-10,66-26 6-1-64 1059 4-7-69 1488 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(EDUCATION)DISTRICT 481,498,530,66-53 66-72, 57-22.67-29,67-30,68-33,68-28,69-4,70-19,71-20(B).71-20(C),PPA77-2, 8-19-64 1079 7-19-71 1620 COMMUNITY FACILITIES IRECREATIONALI DISTRICT 78-1,78-15,PPA76-7,79-3,79-7, - 11-2-64 1098 12-20-71 1692 r MOB:LENOME DISTRICT 12-7-64 IIDfi 7-3-72 1693 ® PRECISE PLAN ALIGNMENT IJ.18-65 I 7-18-77 2207 DESIGNATESM TE STREETS II 1 65 1164 7-3-78 2291 ® DWLBIED CLASSIFICATION m AVE� ---I 1 RII ,Ll......... _-_____-...,�_yKyy C[RI ' ZERI J ZRJ `I Z VJ RI RI R3'i'a' �+ m 3 a 1114 C2 R2 R2 3 I 420 1 u_ M RI PRELUDE DR C F—E RI > CF-E RI RI :aas: g R3 R3 B(S::-pCL 6�tF1 SUITE DR a RI pKONA DR �IRS 3 RA 49a TEVOR DR. Q q10 ro `ONO RI \ / MINUET DR )_ e2 SD HILO CR. O N•4�4NF P-C R RI = KAUI DR.Z R I 9 RHAPSODY DR. MAUI CR. RI I� aRI RI RI RI ?p i I'e RIMONiEFEY----_ - F R I CF-R Vi Vi OPERETTA DR OAHU DR. a CF-R RI URIRIRI DR x 3 A x - ------------' SCENAfl10 - DR. RI M H RI RI C4-1 O C F. C. D. ND 4 S AR V-1 R2 C4� 31 CF-R 1_ _VEIL— . AVE — • °P - :•:•: I R3 :� g CHRISTIANA BMN30.39'33'W 100.00 Ir R2'„'Y+y N 5a•2:;.7' 376P__ `, I I R2 R C4 R. CF-E w R2 p�3Er�a R2 x R2 R3 a;cron_It - CF-R i M RI STAR - fY' R2 RUDDER DN. RI Z RI pa. - 14'PRAT I DR. G PICKWICK CF•R iYi WR(PVT=7fR:: W STA DR BRANFOR RI Z NEE Y R. RI oa. CF-R ° N sP y� R 3 R 2 „ R 2 R 2 o R -E' R' Z R2 = R2 u CF-R R I R I ..R C. .::- ; o RI a J m yy FIG Q. It•-_----___., la A D ST. R R I R I > DALE DR. f6rM4:EQ- ~ � CF-R `MAN RI St, RI BOARDWALK D R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R3 x 3 DIA V 5l R I R I 1aUM6ULL Hwy 2 CF-R tia R I RI Cd MILD T. MILO SIT. R3 300• U F-R W Q. RI RI x DAV NPORT J 01 - _g ` =! R3 R3 R3 = R3 C2 IoRI RI u _ CF-R IR I s e DR.- - T o - — _ m WINDSORDR RI RI RI1°2I �� WARNER AVE —+I 0 c 8 oQ SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 21-5-II E T ¢H CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHA& ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP W eII9 EDINGER AVE ILii I I I m \-L—II..L 7 i I I 1 11 w L DR HENRICKSEN DR CASTLE R. AUDREY i Z I I I I I m u J J J J MANGRUM LINDA CR CF-E - _a3 ViE'i';C::!::!_; LITTLER SN AO DR _ CHERYL OR Z - > —1 CLARK DR SIS50N Dp 1 I _ n PROPOSED O. C. F. C. D. CF-E 1 V DR MEADOWLARK DR (kLd::t; `::";:"al:! %U ! LARK z z z j z j z I MEAD I - a -- PAR CR VENTURI" -pp I a WJ 1 Z F F 00 1 O Z Z O U a0 a -------- 1 a MARSRALL I_O WO a mLd W a 1 - BRMi91E Qi. CALIENTE DR MIDDLE !S DR. 1 1 l I 3 1 HEIL 3 AVE PC CR p g Dow $ CR z a. ,y 9TA DMi C F— R DONL N 6 E;E_ a. _ UA a F1 W I i =GILDRED CR. W MEADOW C9Mj - V V V 'X� G4 'TROPHY DR. Q Ix mo •.� VIEW CR. .......-..._ Ct:.":�l:Fi 0_ .'. I � V✓ARNEP. AVE \ Yoizl 29 2e 21 tt ze tY J-"fe CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 10 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To Ralph Leyva From Bill Cooper Traffic Engineer Paramedic Coordinator Subject HARBOUR LANE Date February 3, 1981 This is to confirm our .conversation of February 1, 1981 concerning the proposed closing of Harbour Lane. If Harbour Lane must be closed, the only option that the Fire Department can support is that an island and two 12 foot minimum gates be constructed at the Saybrook entrance to Fisher Avenue. These gates are to meet standard Fire Department requirements. BC:de CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To /-T aim From 52t 6106 Subject &LiSiN6 Date o-lu �,�Cc-ems —� G'.g SSE ��sue,✓ o,� �,o REUUc�O evoL-0 3r '0q /-J Doi- ?o L•c, >/-o� I? UAu 7:3 ✓T i �uBT rG w� �oc.1 /7o T�J.2i.�� o�P-®vtio o-✓ 7��5 �(/�rz,Eoz,.� 5 i,2� 7 AIL_ 5e­ j lvo o C.O r eLS To Sc� /mac= Soc� .LO SEX7 Sa ,O�o,OL� Cs�-nl X6 T 5 = N c7 �S T C c i7 OA.<S �i4L �Y/.4-�r.�G �r .9 GAL &I-e . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH V. INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Ralph R . Leyva From To Lt . Price Traffic Bureau Commander Traffic Engineer Subject Harbor Lane Date January 27 , 1981 The City Council has received a request to close one end of Harbour-.Lane because of alleged speeders and recent accidents . The original request was to close Harbour at the north end . However , since that time the Christiana Bay Homeowner ' s Association met on January 20, 1981 and concluded that the closure of Harbour should be constructed at the south end . Please review this request and give me your comments in writing to be included in a report to Council . If there is a preference for the closure to be at the north or south end ; please indicate that preference . Thanks for your assistance . RRL : ek a c 24HOUR COUNT .19 _ BATTEP,� 61C1 COUNTAIN ' I LOCATION 6p0lC- LA-L DA TE OF COUNT I ' 'g M Ohl a � H UR C71E `OLIEP/ '-!�—QUI4l ENDING lam 3 4 a o D o 0 7 � - �: 9 ID 3 O ID 10 12 - 1 m I c5 3 �o 2 2 8 Cv 13 3 9 ►D 7 30 3 i 19' 10 11 12 0 TOTAL (p7 i. ti ILA,Me CITY .OF HUNT INGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH 'VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY SHEET FOR LOCAL STREETS RD_!�eL DM e 5 BETWEEN r[SNOC-1 AND MOWI&I(a '!&TAZ VEHICLE SPEED DATA Location ��(��a(J� LA ..tJE,: Weather GL2AZS.. Recorder Nf 'Il�II. kJS 14Aa rDate I� I e '.8 I" T m�e . .3 +5 Time 5 ;45 MPH NUMBER OF VEHICLES TOTAL OF EACH 5 10 15 20 25 SPEED 40 8 over I I I I I I I I i 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 CRITICAL SPEED ti. CALCULATION 35 Total 6t9divided by 6 =0 Count this number of vehicles down from the highest speed observed to determine the 30 critical speed. 25 85th PERCENTI��LEE,SPEED 1 lOmph PACE_SL TO 20 X x _ _ % VEHICLES IN PACE�p� 1 n r TOTAL NUMBER OF VEHICLES OBSERVED 50 PPSC SC- t� 1.t r-� tT Other Considerations 25 �_AF'14 Accident History Unusual Conditions : Date Signed Title SAC i IIAR.80Z1F' LAA1Z- R :-- CONSTUCT/O/V NOTES. ---;CONST- T>�O,,F B=�, "G coivc. C&,Po GUrr�R . I O=COiVST. 4"' 711/C,< CO/VC. - - \:J COiVST. 42"%'/Gf/ 5Z-OCK W,4LL w/T/q. oo - 1 i � U r -O i � r� I �•, i ;rrr..GlSf??Nv'`,U1L .� .1 _ I_I �r w , I fYA RL—:3 JUPP, L AI. a I �A941 s y. SUBJELi r•• HE3 BY DATE f / , GC NO. ITS•? rr� zoo A' 4f F • O�Sr. B--/ /S L41,11., 5:v 7 l Sc •o`' 1`7 S1� i -7. /t��.C'��-4T ' �'l�r'.� c`�/aS /�3 •J� lO.ca ! .3�.'� 7- 00 IV 7ZF fD /41171V i . i CAKE). BY DATE SHEET NO... OF I UNL`: '.i7GNED DENTS OF ' 30UR LANE; ;NC3'1'uN :ACH, iiERI t r-i'I w T}}}. crTY OI - HUNTINGTON BI . ::} TO TAKE IMMI ,ATE S , PS TC, C N ":UL—'F-SA`_' AT ONE `ND OF ,iARBOUR LANE FOfi THE PROTE'CTION /OF OUR LIVES (� � P Rt,i:'F RTl' :.J. SIGNiJ F t-A NT NAME HAKBOUR ' ', . ADDRESS 5z _ _ ... c '� os��i,u�� ter• ��-76_ 0`7 4d N ogg3 OilAj Z",&, 6 31 'AL677 4 .• a.b yr "; '3.1 Ri fry UP "^'4714y�'a' 1 1 ,k�,s�•��;p.'�..,*,w�'� °µ1',�4.," ''W'�P �. *w{,"".'r 9t.?«,«..�:,•t�'�^,^ir3p•�.,,a �^.F",.e yvr'M"�`!{;�,,S gg''��F"��j,. PAGE L OF E'ET!'IIN ?!�). SIGNED r i_ PRINT NAMF. f1ARB0�:�� LN . AI:�DR ..;S an 4 O�2-,A.e 1 n� -3 C., 40 o pt-..:.. .'^i Fi Ey Wp(t.��? i.._IL TL UC� S'4 D 45" yC . .: h <ta d _ r /49 AfAg!)AAW n/1 t �.. ✓1 � . I Zo • PAGE OF PETIT -10,% .1�1... SIGNED PRINT NAMF HAFBOT.:k LN. ADDI",;S (00 �o �U.N Stk RR JAI -- .174 7!L AWN,-. 71 - ._71 - - - - t __. _ --.. PAGE OP PETITION X7 SIGNED . PRINT 'NAME HARBOUR LN . ADL'ilGSS - --- + _ _ t REQUEO FOR CITY NCIACTIO COU Submitted by Paul E. Cook\ Department Public Works 8S Date Prepared------.----, October 23 , 19 80 Backup Material Attached © Yet No Subject (Montere4yLane City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 11-3 Approve as recommended. CITY CLER`LQ A!lioVm BY OITY COUNCIL Statement of Issue, Recommendation, An Iysis,-�mding-Suurce,-Al turn a&e-Aclions: Statement of Issue: ......_.........—__------------------- Monterey Lane was constructed by private d C1�as--a condition ,of develognent to be dedicated as a public street. This required dedication was never made although the street has been used by the public for over 10 years. The use of Monterey as a public street is no longer desirable because of the recent opening of Saybrook to Edinger Avenue. Recndation: 1. That Monterey Lane be retained as a private street. 2. That the c •*ner of. the Mobile' :oine ^ark be ?permanently relieved from the Condition of- A, proval in U.P. 240, U.P. 66-7, U.P. 67-17 & U.P. 69=68 that Monterey St. be dedicated as a-.public street. Discussion: Monterey Lane was constructed along with the development of a multi-phased mobile home park lying south of Edinger Avenue and east of Saybrook Lane. The street served as an access road to the multi-phased mobile home park development and also as an important connecting roadway to Edinger Ave. for the residential areas lying south of the mobile hoarse park. Conditions of approval for the various phases of the mobile hcane park required that . Monterey Lane be dedicated to the public. A search of the records indicates that the dedication was never made, although the roadway has been used by the public for over ten years. It appears that dedication was not made because it was understood that Saybrook.would replace Monterey when it was constructed. Earlier this year the City completed the master planned extension of Saybrook Lane from Santa Barbara to Edinger Avenue. This new arterial highway provided the needed major entry street serving the northern portion of the Huntington Harbour area. Although Monterey Lane was needed at the time it was constructed, the traffic circulation system has been changed by the extension of Saybrook Lane. This change,.ccanbined with the following factors, leads the Public Works Department to the opinion that Monterey is no longer needed or desirable to maintain as a public street regardless of what has happened in the past. 1. It was designed primarily as a local collector street and not intended to carry large volumes of traffic such as an arterial like Saybrook. '2. Monterey Lane has had an accident history in the past related to its curved alignment. 3. The retention of Monterey Lane would present an additional maintenance liability to the City in addition to street lighting costs. Pao 3ne �� Request for Council Action Monterey Lane October 23, 1980 Page 2 The Planning Commission at a recent meeting requested the Director. of Development Services to pursue obtaining the right-of-way on Monterey Lane after receiving an opinion fran the City Attorney that the City does have a vested right in the street. However,, it is staff's opinion that Monterey Lane is not needed nor desirable as a public street and that it should remain private. The owners of the Mobile Home Park have agreed to install additional landscaping on Saybrook and Edinger at Monterey for beautification purposes. PEC:GLT:Jy CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -' INTER-DEPARTMENT CQMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To James W. Palin From City Attorney Director Development Services Subject Failure of Conditions and Date September 19 , 1980 Implied Dedication MEMORANDUM OPINION STATEMENT OF FACTS: Monterey Street is shown on the records as a private street , however, it has been used for at least ten years by the general public . On four different occasions , the city approved a mobilehome development adjacent to Monterey Street and conditioned on each occasion that Monterey Street be dedicated and fully improved to city standards . The developer has failed each time to comply with the conditions imposed, which is dedicate and improve the private street of Monterey. Recently the Department of Development Services has issued a permit for a gate structure including a guard house at the intersection of Monterey Street and Edinger Avenue . The city has performed mainten- ance on this private street from Saybrook Avenue to Edinger Avenue, all during the time the public has used Monterey Street . QUESTION N0. l: Has the city obtained any vested prescriptive rights or implied dedi- cation in Monterey Street due to general public usage and city main- tenance of Monterey Street for more than ten years? ANSWER NO. l : Yes . The city has obtained a vested implied dedication right in Monterey Street . QUESTION NO. 2 : What right does the city have if the developer fails to comply with conditions attached to approval oaf a mobilehome development? The con- dition was that the developer dedicate the private street , that is , Monterey Street . ANSWER NO. 2 : The city may revoke any entitlements granted to the developer where the developer has failed to perform the conditions imposed on the d Memorandum Opinion Re Failure of September 19 , 1980 Conditions and Implied Dedication Page 2 granted entitlement . ANALYSIS NO. 1: The judicial rule of implied dedication comes into effect where there is adverse user by the public . The implied dedication takes place where there is a public use for more than-'five years . The owner' s intent is not involved and the crucial factor is the public use without objection. Gion v. Santa Cruz (1970) 2 Cal. 3d 29 , 38 , 84 Cal.Rptr. 162 . The legislative response to the Gion decision was enactment of California .Civil Code §1009 . Civil Code 51009 (d) provides : "Where a governmental entity is using private lands by an expenditure of public funds on visible improvements on or across such lands or on the cleaning or maintenance related to the public use of such lands in such a manner so that the owner knows or should know that the public is making such use of his land, such use, including any public use reasonably related to the purposes of such improvement , in the absence of either express permission by the owner . to continue such use or the taking by the owner of reason- able steps to enjoin, remove or prohibit such use, shall after five years ripen to confer upon the governmental entity a vested right to continue such use . " Therefore, the city has A vested right to continue. whatever use it has been using in Monterey Street for the past ten years . The city has been cleaning and maintaining Monterey Street. in such a manner that the owner knew or he should have known that the city was making such use of his land. ANALYSIS NO. 2 : If an applicant or a developer fails to comply with the conditions imposed with a granted entitlement , then the city may revoke the en- titlement . "Failure to abide by and to comply faithfully with any and all conditions attached to thy' granting of any conditional use permit pursuant to the provisions of the article shall constitute grounds for revocation of such permit by the City Council . " Huntington Beach Ordinance Code §9845 . GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney GH: G: bc - i �. � '� Y.+JIfW9:r'kl:fpi.iY'Ji-i',r...M...u..:P..I,iA.:A.�:i"��M��.:w'..4..1'r:+..+K.e..•�. '. a ..,� .:s ... CF �. (SCHOOL SITE) y rENOF, m Z. F . C r`± .:.:..... . w ONTEREY DR ..... :. ri w� 1 P ..`:... FISHER DR. { . ox ,- C F-R HEIL AVE. CHRISTIANA BAY m , ............. CF R C F- Ef (HARBOq VIEW r=rr MORNING STAR DR. CF'`RJ PICKWICK CA. { tNUfNE CR. NSA ?' L•__ _, I r..... f .... E p4► STOWAWAY CA: .._ 4 ,� Qom► ` -_..._.,_....... .._. ... GANp CR. _.l O ..., �.... _... ...._...__ _ ;F3ARE!^OUl' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION C Submitted by Paul E. Cook Department Public Works \ Date Prepared July 15 , 1980 Backup Material Attached xn Yes No Subject Park & Pine Cul—de—sacs at Utica City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: Staff desires City Council direction of whether to include cul-de-sacs on Park St. and Pine St. at Utica Ave. in conjunction with the widening of Yorktown Ave. and closure of 17th St. Recommendation: Table the project to cul-de-sac Park and Pine until a full analysis can be made of the effects that the closure of 17th St. at Yorktown will have on these two local streets. Analysis: In 1977, the City Council adopted an ordinance calling for the closure of Park and Pine at Utica. It is unclear to current City engineering staff whether the purpose of these closures was to prevent through traffic on these streets or whether it was intended to protect nearby resi- dents from overflow parking and other problems related to the High School. Attached are the adopted and proposed plans for these closures. Construction would be with- in existing street right-of-way under Plan B to minimize encroachment on adjacent resident's property. A rolled curb will be installed to accommodate emergency fire vehicles. As can be seen, this project will prohibit through traffic but would not solve parking or social problems related to the High School. This could be accomplished by construction of block walls along Utica but this is not feasible because of the requirement for emergency access. Engineering staff has serious reservations on the benefit of this project as related to the estimated $20,000 cost. We feel that the project should be postponed until the effect of the widening of Yorktown and closure of 17th St. at Yorktown can be evaluated under real conditions. Alternative: Direct staff to include the closure of Park and Pine in the Yorktown widening project. This would delay the Yorktown project about 3 weeks. Funding: The re cn vended action would require no immediate outlay of funds. The alternative action is estimated to cost $20,000 frown gas tax funds. PEC:jy Pio sna r Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: ` Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning ' Commission ' ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, . City Administrator DATE: July 5, 1977 SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 7676D APPLICANT: Initiated by Planning Department LOCATION; At the intersections of Park Street and Pine Street with the south side of Utica Avenue REQUEST- A proposal to provide two (2) cul-de-sac street closures with a curb to curb width of 60. ft. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ON MOTION BY PARKINSON AND SECOND BY SHEA PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT -NO . 76-.6D WAS APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 1194 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : •Parkinson, :Finley,' Gibson, Slates , Shea, Newman, Boyle NOES : None ABSENT: None PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Based on the reasons contained in Resolution No. 1194 : 1. Said closures will prohibit undesirable through traffic from disrupting a .residential area. 2 . Said closures will not adversely affect the overall circulation ' of the City. The Planning Commission recommends approval_ of. Precise Plan of Street ! Alignment No. 76-6D. SUMMARY ANALYSIS : Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 76-6D was initiated in response to citizen complaints. concerning 'the high speed traffic and parking problems on Park Street and Pine Street. The specific proposal is to provide the closure of Park Street and .Pi.ne Street by constructing cul-de-sacs within the existing 60 feet of right-of-way . Approximately 40 square feet of additional right-of-way must be acquired from the adjacent parcels to allow the continuation of a 3 ft. wide sidewalk. • Page 2 Three alleys adjacent to .the affected residences between Utica Avenue and Springfield Street will also be designated one-way alleys with traffic flowing north to prohibit their use by undesirable through traffic.. _ The estimated cost of the necessary improvements if $6 , 000 . Due to the receipt of few formal comments on the closures in the early stages of this project, one hundred forty-one questionnaires were mailed to the residents of the two streets . Sixty-two (62) responses were received. Of those respondents favoring closure, 60 percent favored the cul-de-sac .closures . Thirty-three (33) percent of the. respondents opposed any type of closure. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Both the Police and Fire Department have reviewed the proposed closures . The' Fire Department has requested that one additional fire hydrant be installed on Park Street and on Pine Street and that a_ drive-through for emergency vehicles only be provided at the end of each cul-de-sac . These concerns will be incorporated in the final engineering designs . The Police Department has indicated that they have no objection to the closures . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 76-61> was addressed as part of Final Environmental Impact Report No . 76-5 which was adopted by the City Council on December 6, 1976 . No significant adverse environmental i impacts resulting from the closures were identified. SUPPORTING INFORMATION: 1 1. Area map 2 . Staff Report Respectfully submitted, Edward D. Selich Secretary EDS :BA.: ja Attachments y KAN j i� II Q dressed -�Orir� veh«�PS I s � I\lEw Curb , GuE¢ a I � i REQUEST rOR CI 0 NCIL AG., 10N Submitted by Paul E. 'Cook, Director\ Department Public Works + Date Prepared February 6 # 1g 80 Backup Material Attached 7 Yes No Subject Closure of pedestrian walkway between Kukui Drive and Kamuela Dr;ve City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCD_ Approve .as recommended y s9i9S _ OF ITY CL09&"f Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: The Department of Public Works has received a petition from several residents and a letter frcm the General Manager of Oda Nursery requesting the closure of the pedestrian walkway. Recommendation: It is reccnvended that the pedestrian walkway remain, .open until it is no longer needed by school-age children. Analysis: The subject walkway was constructed in 1964 as a condition of approval for Tentative Tract No. 4708 in order to allow.pedestrians and Lamb Elementary School children to cross the Southern California Edison Ccmpany's 200 feet-wide transmission tower easement. The Fountain Valley School District closed Lamb School at the.end of the 1978-79 school year due to decline in enrollment. The facility is now being leased to the Huntington Beach Union High School District for their Administrative Offices for a ten year period. The residents of the homes adjacent to the walkway and Oda Nursery Inc. , who leases the Edison Easement, have cited noise, litter and vandalism as reasons for the requested closure. A recent survey indicates that 80 to 100 school-age children are still using the access- way each day on their way to and from Arevalos School which is located south of Yorktown Avenue. A letter from the Fountain Valley School District has been received requesting the City to consider keeping the access open because it is on the shortest and safest route to school. , A review of the area map shows that the children would be forced to walk along Brookhurst Street or Ward Street instead of walking through the various tracts while commuting to and frcm school. Alternatives: 1. Request a resolution of intention.to vacate the subject walkway and set a time and place for hearing all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation. A condition of the vacation could be that the adjacent property owners assume the expense of the walkway removal. 2. Close the walkway only during the summer and other.vacation periods. Funding Source: ere are no budgeted funds for the removal of the walkway or the construction of gates to enable intermittent closure. PF('-PRL,:ek / PLANNING ZONING DM 5 --TIONAL DISTRICT MAP 5-6-10 NOTE �T/-p1T]' ®� ADOPTED AUGUST Ib,1960 ALL DINNER IONSME N FEET CITY mil/ ANY ZONE ADJdNING ANY RIGHT OF WAY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 of IiDCIH RIGHT D of w tiD To THE CENTER AMENDED Rq D,NO. AMENDED ORD.NO. LEGEND: ®OFFICE RROFFSSIONAL DISTINCT IIUNTINGT®N BEACH 6_-63 9O7 CM HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ST 11-19-62 938 FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE 1-7-eb 947 ® SINGLE FIYILY RESIOENC! DISTRICT I-2I-Bb 948 ® COMYIMITY BUSINESS DISTRICT 4-I-6S 9SB ® TYrO FAALY RESIDENCE DISTRICT® LIYITW NULTIPLE FAMLY RESIDENCE DISTRICT e 3-63 969 ®ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Iz RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT.7.e. IIO6 ::::: OLMONATES PRIVATE STREETS 4-4.66 1196 ® MOBILEHOYE DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: 12-4-67 1372 COMMUNITY FACILITIES(EDUCATION)DISTRICT 245,278,279,295,2".310.314.482,66-5.67-26,86-49,71-12. 2-17-69 HITS 9-7-71 1657 '"r a -_l \` GARFIELD AVE. / `CITY_ Y R I R I R I HUNTINGTON BEACH -- KAIMU DR. A A Da 1' W RI ,97,� RI RI _ 4j K Illp- C4 MAIKA�C OR. Q' SC'I"::ERN ....�... .�v.. t— �' R 1 PAPUA R I (E:.:.Is SUBSTAT'H) I I R LN. TANA iP PUA - DR. R I ,? ' �o I !!I ,To ti g RI MEA R I m RI ;g RI KUKUI qt, jQ $ RI R—A ED:soN WI f A R I i 2l5S' 8 RI - KAMUELA DR / 3 RI rRR I HALAWA DR. SUNOAY m M H Ri RI ; RI RI LIRCF-E RIpRI (:.aAB 5......0.1 RI PAGO RAW CAR.ICRRI1 3 ISIA2' . 'J 1 RI RI ff 4 I FORREWAL MONITOR DR. O RI RI R RI I Q r Q VALLEY FORGE RI MERRIMAC DR. I RI RI RI CF-E CONSTITUTION DR. ILJ RI BISMARK OR. i R I LURLINE DR. Rt R I °R `z R I DR. I R I R2 �AEL.-Ry. R2 R21 DFt. R3 I R3 I� RI N ! I eii ei.� 1MLBrM OCr I . R3 R3 R2 I RI RI I ; r 7AL9F:RT E WATER cc C) i ;(!(STRICT m Q Ilo C 2 R3 R3,I-- ;RESERWR i N 8 R3:':%lam:sa�"i R2 m •u �------L......._ Dso.06 R3 mv4, ADAMS AVENUE A !\_ 5 4 _ I SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 6-6 - 10 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP I � SWKETREE AYE "IKE AVE " I ! I I ! I I I 1 1 I \ M_11t�� Hill i ORIME AVE 8 WARBLER AVE FOR- RIVER GARFIELD— -- —_ A,F.I J J L. ALBACORE DR. I N I LN CR Z __N — 3 PN� FF¢a -__ _ LITCHFIELD 7 DR. N T R N CR QQp - I d a I + I ' I ; VELARDO DR. VELARDO M. NYDE PARK I I i I DR O O. C F C D. ... E.Ns..I R/V! ....i„ON RJW T' -- .r=1 I. z _ KREPP DR. J F 0 D R DR � Z -- C F—E i- i .I.�- �._. RONNEY DR. PR4ACK DR j ITAi.B(:.HT$i:H:H:E.1 :-- _�__ _ ..r_i,_ I —�-- —�--- BLADE SAILFISH DR I BRABxAM DR KAREN C i u ANNIK j DR o GRAND ' DR. = FuI R I YORKTOWN j _ AVE. I VERONICA DR DR I-- GREENWICH DR. I— —.--I\{{ J� . (OKA SCHM. .) nF.t.n DR ORTSMOUT DR NNBBRUCK _—. DR I_- [LVA CR NANTUCKET DR. wo--LAW: -- E ! I CF-R MUSHARD SCHOOL) 13 (PARK) on c`, W 5 HYANNIS PORT D0. wAR ioN DaKan L 1.L-_I—mil ..�_- _._!.L. _ I I I cF t I_i_ __ I I - I I - I-� I t f-- I ' F CAPE 'COD DR. TELNAN �.. .I ; , L Q (WARDL.OW SCH(ML) I GROTON DR I aLEY Q PIONEER AMzma_------- W : Iw -un4.noo: . -- R T 3 . GETTYSBURG DR CIMwi4 ..-_ ._1>8...:...,{ L'lf`•�.::�i O ly _ 6 W C I a4liGri.•_ /J,CRAWFORD CR - if _ �- Lt "- � m A :..... — �rsro.Y: ADAMS AVE. \} a chool District ountin `"ZJd�lle._y , r- Number One 41ghahou'se' Lan Mailiin•g Address_: P. O. Box 8510 Px FOUNTAIN WALL"EY CALIF®RNIA 92708 • (TJ4) 842=6651 4 January 28, 1980 Mr. Bill Waddell City of Huntington Beach 6th and Peacan Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: Pedestrian Walkway Across the Edison Easement North of Iamb School Dear Bill: It is our understanding that the City has received two complaints regarding the subject Walkway. This letter is requesting the City to consider keeping this access open for students to use because: 1. It is the shortest route to school. 2. It is the safest route to school. If we can be of any assistance in this matter, please do not hesitate to call me office. Sincerely, / -oto,4� JACK E. MAMIEEN, Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent Personnel Services cj/ 0 D S A N JUA'r CA1'1:�I IlArq(7, C%.i_iFUF1NiA 92615 ILI.E01-10NE: (7141831 7300 _ April 24 , 1979 Vr . Michael .Vanbory Director of Parks & Recreation City of Huntington Beach 7000 Main St . luntingLon Beach , CA Dear Mr. Vanbory , Tt is my understanding that Lamb School .in Huntington Peach is due to be closed in the near. future . Tf this is true , may we please request the closing of the pedestrian Walk way between Kuk"i Dr . and Yamuela Dr . We are the lease holder of the Edison casement bounded by Br.00khurst , Ward , Kukui and Kamuela . The aforementioned walk way bisects our property and has provided accessibility to our property leaving - it vulnerable to many thousands of dollars of damage by vandalism. I 'm sure the private property owners on the four_ sides o _ this walk way must feel as we do and we know your food judgement will show that the closure of this walk way would be in the best interest of everyone concerned . Thanking you for your attention in this matter I remain- Respectfully , r William Piyashi.ro , General Manager Oda Nursery , Inc . . IdT! vb WATCH US GROW ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO SERVE AS YOUR V.'HOLESALE GROWER AND DEALER OF GENERAL NURSERY STOCK April 24, 1979 Mr. Michael Zanbory Director of Public Works City of Huntington Beach Dear Mr. Zanbory: We, the residents bordering the public walkthru between Kamuela and Kukui, would like to request the.closing of this walkthru since it will no longer be. necessary after Lamb School is closed at the end of this school year. This area is a hangout for kids of all ages. Cars, motorcycles, bicycles and skate- boards come and go at all hours of the day and night. Our property is constantly pelted with beer cans, bottles and other liquor containers.. Matchbooks, cigarette packages and cigarette butts are discarded on our property. Fires.are frequently set in the area and sometimes on our property. Also, the battle against graffiti on the walls is a constant one. We certainly would appreciate the peace that the closing of this public nuisance would bring. Sincerely, 10331 Karnuela 962-9788 Fred Simons 10331 Kamuela 962-9788 Clime Simons l y G , ` WHITE-CITY ATTORNE BLUE-CITY CLERK Y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. ` - GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR ''C CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department Bill Kohxim INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: Z1121ane nw-m a rowlution of intent to close the estria" walkv3ay l et,xjan Ruk-ui an Tmmela Drives, generally located south of Garfield avenue and woo o�: 10-treat. S-�veral re Jidents of tho area and the ao er of Oda T3ursery have rwjuaasted -;ho City to cl oso to T ra.'JaAW citing litter and vandalism problam- . With t-.- src-`cent closu e of Lmra School, the wallway, althong�i convenient, is no longer recsssary to ensure school children safe access to and from, schcol I.�hc Ploarming Cm—t-Assion considered t -xis request vdth regard to its eonfomenc a xAth the c'eral !?!an on July 17, 1979, and fdWl tine closuTe to be in confoniance with the General Plan. The planning CcL.i.ssi.on d1rC-10tced that the v.tter be :p-t for a lic hearincT before the City Council., with the r3�Mendat, r.. that the right-of-way wav i o retaiim d should t ze City desire to r`qp n C e walkway in t_'— future. ac'an r t= all- Itav: been attaches for your Izeformation. Desired effective date signed: Approved as to availability of funds octobar 15, 1979 �y ,r Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: City Administrator F WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY �, CITY OF HUNTINGTON br ACH No. BLUE-CITY CLERK GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR (:r CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION e ' Date Request made by Department Oct— 30, 1979 James ST a =�it� i� Ds�e�ol it car $rAZ11�'E'. INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution-is hereby requested: Ple��� tyre a,rre a _re:solu ti o z o" inten'- to c 1 o^c the c du 'man Tx'u"-.0 and NEM.1lela Drives. The w1c1._; :.C:av TIay be clot d '/.tor.%n- orw—_ _'v or oerna%1nfl:tly at %A ^ Council".- d__Scrotion o PG '.c`?7LE''s3C c10�u�C �Jol�l nec aT:,?'l:ate vacation. ofexisting easement across rdi ion m`:•o?ertyo The Plia.n.ning Comi^s4_on f—ind both altvimativets to be in conform anc o -Irho Ca.r:L rp-1 Plan on J11117 17, 1979., Public heanl nq has b:c en i;nntatt ivel I:Chr_,Cul.ed i or November 19, 197�-% Plo se rax!er all c ws-Cions to Bill Holman at extension 52750 Desired effective date Signed: ' Approved as to availability of funds November 19, 1979 J Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: �� City Administrator y WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY �, rg CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. �- BLUE-CITY CLERK GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date' Request made by Department INSTR.UCTIONS:-File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it•is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate -,paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must bex eared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's,Office: r Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: TI lvlo,�ie prepare a. resolution of i ntCla"t to close the ped6strian fi-mlkwav bietwecn Kuk.' a and 1�amue?a Drives, as reguesteel by neighboring resi."entse Petmanent closure would necbscitate vacation of existing eaa c ^n : a b i on property arse removal o exi elfin impro�;enents The PlanlAng Commission found this -request to be In confomIance with the C=Cl narai P1,an on July 17, 1979. Please refer all questioi to 37 ll "oln,an att e9tensi:an 5275. r t 4 f Desired effective date Signed: i Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance ' CityAttorney Please prepare and submit printed co Ics to this office b Y— P P � P P Y' iP'/4___'/ '55��C�ity Administrator . I '_ •` � f' /— C�4L Taws �D.S REQUEv T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA #7 9-3 7 Submitted by City Administrator Department Administration \ Date Prepared April 30 , 1979 Backup Material Attached Yes a No Subject Hold Harmless Resolution City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY CO Approve as recommended CITY CLERK Statement of Issue, Recommendation,-Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: NU Statement of Issue: Q A full detour of Beach Blvd. at Adams Ave. and at Atlanta Ave. is necessary in order to build a .Master Plan Storm Drain. This will require State hiahwav traffic to use local arterial streets. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. y7s'1 granting a hold harmless to CalTrans in connection with the closure of Beach Blvd. due to Master Plan Storm Drain construction. Analysis: In order to complete a Master Plan Storm Drain across Beach Blvd. in conjunc- tion with the construction of Tract 10226 , it is necessary to, open-cut the boulevard to lay the pipe. The contractor will work continuously 24 hours per day in order to complete the project within three days or at the maximum within five days. During the three to five day period, all southbound traffic on Beach Blvd. will be detoured easterly on Adams Ave. to Magnolia St. , southerly on Magnolia St. to Atlanta Ave. , and westerly on Atlanta Ave. back to Beach Boulevard. Northbound traffic on Beach Blvd. will use the reverse route. In order to permit the open-cut of Beach Blvd. and the required detour of traffic., Cal Trans requests they be held harmless from any or all claims or causes for action of damages to the street system of the City of Huntington Beach resulting from traffic being detoured onto City streets from Beach Boulevard. Alternatives: Do not permit the use of City arterial streets as a detour but rather require the detour to be installed on Beach Blvd. around the work being performed. This alternative would greatly increase the cost of construction and would require an estimated five weeks for completion of the work rather than the three to five days as planned. Funding Source: The entire cost of the detour including signs, pavement markings , sandblasting and restriping of lane markings will be borne by the owner of Tract 10226 P10 3/78 �� Request for Council Action April 30, 1979 Page 2 along with the construction cost of the storm drain itself. All these costs are subject to reimbursement from Drainage District No. 8C at such time as monies are paid into the district by other future developers . FGB:MZ: jy I City of Huntington Beach . � .:. • (f � P.O. BOX 190 'CALIFORNIA492648 fiN, r` OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 8, 1979 Mr. Lloyd Brown Cal Trans Permit Section P. 0. Box 2304 Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051 Dear Mr. Brown: Attached please find a copy of Resolution 4751 granting a hold harmless to CalTrans in connection with the closure of Beach Boulevard due to a storm drain construction project. If I may be of any further help to you in this matter, please do not hesi- tate. to call . Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:es Enclosures has REQUEST' CITY COUNCIL ACTION 0 Submitted by James W. Palin A Department Planning COU O Date Prepared October 12, ' 1978 8 Backup Material Attached 0 Yes No Subject . LAKE STREET EXTENSION City Administrator's Comments A•/ � A�"�.�„�t,���i.. �.� GPI} '?!/ Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Huntington Beach Company has submitted a letter dated September 29, 1978, requesting that a third General Plan Amendment be initiated this . .year for the purpose of deleting Lake Street extension between Garfield and Yorktown Avenues. RECOMMENDATION: City Council direct the Planning Department to include the consideration of the Lake Street extension for deletion in General Plan Amendment . 79-1, which is tentatively scheduled for hearing in mid-February upon completion of the Transportation Demand Model, and that no further consid- eration take place at this time. ANALYSIS: The City' s adopted Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways shows a proposed extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue (see attached map) . The proposed extension shows Lake Street as a primary arterial street (100 foot right-of-way) and would make use of portions of the abandoned railroad right-of-way. .Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6A through E was considered by the Planning Commission at a March 29 , 1977, study session. The Planning Commission at that time directed staff to remove the Lake Street exten- sion and widening from the proposed precise plans. On July 12, 1977, the Planning Commission, in response to the City department heads' re- quest, reopened discussion of the Lake Street extension and widening. A consensus was reached that a public hearing should be held on the Lake Street extension and widening. This hearing has not yet been held. In July:, 1978, the City Council authorized the staff to contract with the consultimg firm of PBQ&D for development of a Transportation Demand No 3/78 i f' Lake Street October 12, 1978 Page 2 Model. The model will provide the City staff with a management tool to assist in analyzing transportation issues such as the Lake Street extension. The Transportation Study is not scheduled for completion until Mid-January. At that time, the City staff could re-examine the desirability of extending Lake Street north of Yorktown and would have better information concerning the appropriate street width for Lake Street. In order for the Planning staff to favorably respond to the Huntington Beach Company' s request, it would entail curtailing other ongoing planning efforts such as delaying the Transportation Demand Model and development of the Community Facilities Element of the General Plan, to name just a few. Also, the current limited number of staff in the Planning Department would make preparation of a third General Plan Amendment within such a short period of time almost impossible. ALTERNATIVES: 1. No action. 2. Direct Planning Department to prepare a third General Plan Amendment for 1978. JWP:df Attached: 1. H.B. Co. letter dated 9-29-78 2. Area Map I I I HAtin ton Beach Com a 2110 MAIN STREET,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 1714)960-4351 S.A.YOUNG VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL MANAGER September 29, 1978 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Attention: Mr. Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Dear Mr. Belsito: In the Circulation Element of Arterial Streets and Highways of the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach an extension of Lake Street is depicted between Yorktown Avenue and Garfield Avenue. This extension and its impact. on Lake Street was the subject of a great deal of public discussion in the last couple of years. We concur with the residents of Lake Street who expressed their opinions that Lake Street should not be extended beyond Yorktown Avenue. Accordingly, we request, as the third General Plan Amendment in 1978, the deletion of the depicted extension of Lake. Street in the aforesaid Circulation Element. Very truly yours , SAY/h D Q C i ;; 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AMENDMENTSCIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL v[nmree CITY m - "" �' STREETS AND HIGHWAYS -- ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.4568 DEC.12.1976 y LEGEND: FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY �r MAJOR__ -_45,000 1 .., PRIMARY-__3Q000 SECONDARY_ _206000 e NOTE: _ SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS g9 ���♦�,..r f'�'O J E C T I CATION ' b ti CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �y '�• ,� / ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA i M[Nl,m[1 M WY tl,.L.i OAIRIt1,f REQUEST CITY COUNCIL ACTION o James W. Palin A Planning Submitted by Department Date Prepared October 12, , 1978 Backup Material Attached 0 Yes No Subject LAKE STREET EXTENSION City Administrator's Comments Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Huntington Beach Company has submitted a letter dated September 29, 1978, requesting that a third General Plan Amendment be initiated this year for the purpose of deleting Lake Street extension between Garfield and Yorktown Avenues. RECOMMENDATION: City Council direct the Planning Department to include the consideration of the Lake Street extension for deletion in General Plan Amendment 79-1, which is tentatively scheduled for hearing in mid-February upon completion of the Transportation Demand Model, and that no further consid- eration take place at this time. ANALYSIS: The City' s adopted Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways shows a proposed extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue (see attached map) . The proposed extension shows Lake Street as a primary arterial street (100 foot right-of-way) and would make use of portions of the abandoned railroad right-of-way. _Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6A through E was considered by the Planning Commission at a March 29, 1977, study session. The Planning Commission at that time directed staff to remove the Lake Street exten- sion and widening from the proposed precise plans. On July 12, 1977, the Planning Commission, in response to the City department heads' re- quest, reopened discussion of the Lake Street extension and widening. A consensus was reached that a public hearing should be held on the Lake Street extension and widening. This hearing has not yet been held. In July, 1978, the City Council authorized the staff to contract with the consultimg firm of PBQ&D for development of a Transportation Demand �y Pio $na O `t aP Lake Street October 12, 1978. Page 2 Model. The model will provide the City staff with a management tool to assist in analyzing transportation issues such as the Lake Street extension. The Transportation Study is not scheduled for completion until Mid-January. At that time, the City staff could re-examine the desirability of extending Lake Street north of Yorktown and would have better information concerning the appropriate street width for Lake Street. In order for the Planning staff- to favorably respond to the Huntington Beach Company' s request, it would entail curtailing other ongoing planning efforts such as delaying the Transportation Demand Model and development of the Community Facilities Element of the General Plan, to name just a few. Also, the current limited number of staff in the Planning Department would make preparation of a third General Plan Amendment within such a short period of time almost impossible. ALTERNATIVES: 1. No action. 2. Direct Planning Department to prepare a third General Plan Amendment for 1978. JWP:df Attached: 1. H.B. Co. letter dated 9-29-78 2. Area Map Hu,itington Beach Compan dy 2110 MAIN STREET,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 1714)960-4351 S.A.YOUNG VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL MANAGER September 29, 1978 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members City. of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Attention: Mr. Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Dear Mr. Belsito: In. the Circulation Element of Arterial Streets and Highways of the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach an extension of Lake Street is depicted between Yorktown Avenue and Garfield Avenue. This extension and its impact on Lake Street was' the subject of a great deal of public discussion in the last couple of years. We concur with the residents of Lake Street who expressed their opinions that Lake Street should not be extended beyond Yorktown Avenue. Accordingly, we request, as the third General Plan Amendment in 1978, the deletion of the depicted extension of Lake Street. in the aforesaid Circulation Element. Very truly yours , SAY/h --left 0 is T 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AMENDMENTS \PL4 CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL sl aTY wrwssia+7 wwa` r STREETS - _ AND HIGHWAYS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 4368 DEC.12,1976 LEGEND: FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY 4 �r MAJOR__ __45,000 s PRIMARY____-3Q000 SECONDARY. _20.000 a NOTE: SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY 6 I DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS S \ ILI fFt#OJECT CATION ® 00 ----- AVE CITY OF `1�' ti HUNTINGTON BEACH '4r• x° ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA h-Io. • M xuxNgrox 1lKx xllMi pO11,T„Ltt (= • CITY OF HUf in (iTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES V_ P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 L� /� /,7� o ECEUWEE D TO: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator G , 30 � AUG 2 5 1977 FROM: Edward D. Selich, Planning Director DATE: August 22, 1977 f, " CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SUBJECT: LAKE STREET EXTENSION AND WIDENING �N� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The Planning Commission has been asked by several department heads to reconsider its earlier decision to discontinue activity on the Lake Street extension project. Due to the considerable amount of input received on both sides of the Lake Street issues, the increase in development activity along Lake Street and the importance of the Lake Street projects, the Planning Commission is desirous of dis- cussing the issues involved with the City Council. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Set date for joint study session of the City Council and Planning Commission to discuss the Lake Street extension and widening projects . ANALYSIS: .B The extension of Lake Street .(from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue) and its widening to primary arterial standards (100 ft. ) have been major transportation issues in Huntington Beach for several years. Even though these proposals have been reflected in the City ' s Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways since its inception, General Plan Amendment 76-12, adopted in March, 1976 , clarified the City' s desired direction. In conjunction with the Main Street realignment project, the Lake Street extension is intended to: 1. Increase the number of north-south arterials providing access to the downtown/beach area. 2 . Even the distribution of traffic now utilizing Main Street between several streets to avoid focusing high traffic volumes and the resultant disruption to residential character on a single street; 3 . Divert traffic to the edges of the existing residential areas to minimize disruption and separation; 4 . Reduce existing time delay and safety problems at several inter- sections. _ o - Y Page 2 Therefore, to accomplish these goals1to implement the Circulation Plan and to enable the City to secure AHFP financing for the Lake Street extension, staff prepared several alternative Precise Plans of Street Alignment for Lake Street and other related streets in the Civic Center and Oldtown Area. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve: 1. The widening of Lake Street south of Yorktown Avenue from its existing 90 feet of right-of-way to 106 feet in order to preserve the westerly parkway; and- 2 . The extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue creating a 100 foot right-of-way that would begin at the intersection of Garfield Avenue and Main Street and proceed southerly along the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way to Yorktown Avenue. These proposals were presented to the Planning Commission and affected residents at a series of study sessions held in January, February, and March, 1977 . Approximately 200 of the 1200 property owners notified for each meeting attended. The majority of the citizen comments stated opposition to the widening of Lake Street. Noise and safety problems resulting from the high traffic volumes that are projected, as well as the redirection of beachbound traffic through a residential area and the dependence of the Downtown Redevelopment effort on the Lake Street projects were cited as major points of concern. In response, staff prepared the following additional alternatives for consideration: 1. Maintaining the existing street network. 2 . Proceeding with the realignment of Main Street without extending or widening Lake Street. 3 . Utilizing Delaware Street as an alternative primary arterial highway. 4 . Diverting through traffic to Beach Boulevard and Goldenwest Street. 5 . Creating a one-way couplet utilizing Main Street and Lake Street. 6 . Creating a one-way couplet utilizing Lake Street and Delaware Street . 7 . Creating a one-way couplet utilizing Lake .Street and the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way. 8 . Developing Lake Street as a primary arterial highway with a 30 foot wide frontage road on the westerly side of Lake Street. 9 . Developing a primary arterial highway on the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way. After reviewing these additional alternatives and listening to the citizen and staff input, the Planning Commission directed staff to dis- continue activity on the Lake Street Precise Plans. s Page 3 On May 25, 1977, the Planning Commission received a letter from the Director of Harbors and Beaches, the Fire Chief, the Chief of Police and the Director of Public Works requesting that the extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue be reopened. At a subsequent Planning Commission study session, the Director of Harbors and Beaches pointed out that the City; s beach facilities have been planned based on having Lake Street as a major access point and that the number of people using the beaches will continue to increase, increasing the burden on already overburdened streets. The Fire Chief also explained that the location of fire stations was based on' the City' s adopted Circulation Plan and without the north/south access provided by the Lake Street extension and the Main Street realignment, the ability to adequately respond to fires in central Huntington Beach would be impaired . As a result of this additional information and the Planning Commission 's concern for the commitments previously made to the residents of Lake Street, the Planning Commission would like the opportunity to discuss this matter with the City Council, at a joint study session of the Council and Commission. Respectfully submitted, E ward D. Selich Director EDS;BA:ja 3 I - : .. a .• name • .alili.f �. nnn•,au i/. filnnanna•� .• • • "�f11.� a• nr 11►� � D=a^•S^•:p:.^L =�_�_�" I anmf;; � �lirTr �. �n� ' tine = S-_�-I- � '�` � � .-� • n 1111111 �� ••f/f f./n�f�i �. / �� Nt//a•fM�f/ w r f f Iu�5 - � _� �-f�111; faf=naaa�' . �' � '.� •. S� f, aL! y1111•' 1 r -, .. =10 as .• �7:Inl �i•:a�. �K3�� k —y �_ t�; Iu�Inlr uure I:tl IIl1�lied11P �,a ���1 ■■� fi ► 11 Ilf 1111-1u� I 1W105 hlgtl tlI1F!IIg101 Bid • Sol._ I IH INNItG,HNNIAI dNNlN6111111(II •� NINNI IINRI tlNtlB NYlIN"dN91AI'NptlR 1111tl?IRAIII:Rtlb �_ 11111 INIININ NININI IRIINNI NUIIIIII 1 Ltl0tl pNNtl ttltl lim IRMO.ANtl NNW gN HUI NIIINN �S'j �\ 1♦ 1 1 IiIUINI IINNIIII Ulldllq IIIIIIIII! �'- ,NIBIII Ntl11 am MINA unno moo NI41N :_ uu III�IIU IININId INIIdNf IIIIIIIIII ME N�1 IIINN�1 POUND NINN N13NN! dIN14 E11dIN •� 611111�I 111181111'NllgNd NNNIN ININdN NIBIWI pl{IIIIII NqN �� npll I etla AtlSIe�R MIN91 dlNl° s t118NN 9AIN9 M-fm LU „ . - - _ � � U NNRIIUII AIUIIdIW1UINIR INIdRIIIAUIUIIIIII -- �=��� q�NIA mmm I tl1AtltlP' NNNN18RkNNAI1NN _ nwllh Atluuw. oae�unul`. / � 9s' iwidNNoe au�r g6ai masp/jy.� iq�\air.yi a� N11UItl111�tltl8tlltl INe'NNANd �' i ��V tlIIANIANpq INpNllt�d dNAfi��tl " �yh4���� ®NIRMI��IdINNI 916 1�➢N .... a' -a9uelr wNslq►``1I�� Ilk illy Wllpidll INN U�Yw �y." =l1Q�d�il9�q°��_ly�V �� yk '��. LLJ LLJ `MumLU '.fill L_I�' ' � jam°`."�+� '1�;��°�� � �'�9q���` � 'ft ����`���:. • LU Ck Ln LL �� _= IIN►,� '�� ��� 0 f�(e . +� r�+as iy- -� • LU Cie CL 1 � /o s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HU.NTINGTON HEACH - Floyd G. Belsito James W. Palin To City Administrator From Acting Planning Director Subject LAKE STREET EXTENSION Date October 2 , 1978 The City' s adopted Circulation plan of Arterial Streets and Highways shows a proposed extension of Lake Street from Yorktown Avenue to Garfield Avenue (see attached map) . The proposed extension shows Lake Street as a Primary Arterial Street (100 foot right-of-way) and would make use of portions of the abandoned railroad right-of-way. Precise Plan of Street Alignment 76-6A through E was considered by the Planning Commission at a March 29, 1977 , study session. The Planning Commission at that time directed staff to remove the Lake Street exten- sion and widening from the proposed precise plans. On July 12, 1977 the Planning Commission, in response to the City department heads' request, reopened discussion of the Lake Street extension and widening. A consensus was reached that a public hearing should be held on the Lake Street extension and widening. This hearing has not yet been held. In July, 1978 , the City Council authorized the staff to contract with the consulting firm of PBQ & D for development of a Transportation Demand Model. The model will provide the City staff with a management tool to assist in analyzing transportation issues such as the Lake Street exten- sion. The Transportation Study is not scheduled for completion until mid-January. At that time, the City staff could re-examine the desirability of extending Lake Street north of Yorktown and would have better information concerning the appropriate street width for Lake Street. r On October 2 , 1978, the City Council received a letter from the Hunting- ton Beach Company requesting that a third General Plan Amendment be initiated in 1978 for the purpose of deleting the Lake Street extension between Garfield Avenue and Yorktown Avenue. In order for the Planning staff to favorably respond to the Huntington Beach Company' s request , it would entail curtailing other ongoing planning efforts such as delaying the Transportation Demand Model and development of the Community Facilities Element of the General Plan, to name just a few. Also, the current limited number of staff in the Planning Department would make preparation of a third General Plan Amend- ment within such. a short period- of time almost impossible. The Planning staff would recommend to the City Council that further consideration of the Lake Street extension be delayed until after com- pletion of the Transportation Demand Model in mid-January. JWP:RB:df AMENDMENTS `\ I - PI wNG �r� :'7 CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL ���. STREETS AND HIGHWAYS ADOPTED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.0.4368-DEC.12,1976 '` \,•I,a LEGEND FREEWAY. STREET CAPACITY �■ MAJOR-_- ____-45,000 I PRIMARY-__-MOOO SECONDARY_ _.20,000 NOTE: --- - SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY \ ' NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO mI RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS of ---,-- ECT `� I CATION CITY .rt1� j �. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA r' ry-p �0 5rreer )el CITY OF HunTmGTOn BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES l 6 _ P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 1 14) 536-5271 T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council ATTN: Floyd G. . Belsito, City Administrator FROM: James W. Palin, Acting Planning Director DATE: October 16, 1978 G SUBJECT: POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTIES LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN YORKTOWN AND GARFIELD This afternoon Mr. Belsito, City Administrator, requested that I prepare some alternative policies for review and possible enactment on pending and future development which may border upon the proposed extension of Lake Street and the Southern Pacific right-of-way between Yorktown and Garfield Avenues. As discussed he requested that these policies set forth procedures whereby development could be pursued for entitlement in the interim period between the City Council' s possible. action to instruct the Planning Commission to include for consideration the possible deletion of the Lake Street extension within General Plan Amendment 79-1, with the understanding that a certain amount of risk would be involved by developers should they proceed with additional plans after the entitlement stage. Following are some alternative policies which the Council may wish to consider in instructing City Boards and Commissions on a procedure to follow. A. During the interim period between the October 16 , 1978, Council action to instruct the Planning Commission to include for consideration the possible deletion of Lake from the Circulation Element and include the subject matter in General Plan Amendment 79-1, the entitlement bodies of the City may deny applications that come before them at a pub- lic hearing on a finding that the proposed projects are inconsistent with the General Plan. B. Entitlement bodies may find the proposed project inconsistent in an action for approval, with the stipulation that a condition of approval shall be incorporated in the action stating that the project shall be ade consistent by subsequent action, which would be the ultimate etermination to delete Lake from the Circulation Element, and that should this deletion not take place, the approval action would become null and void. C. An entitlement body could table action on a pending request, with the concurrence of the applicant, until such time as a final determination is made by the City Council on the decision to delete Lake Street extension from the Circulation Element. J fi Lake Street Policies October 16, 1978 Page 2 D. The applicant may be given the option to file alternative plans, one delineating Lake Street through a project and an alternative not showing Lake, in which case a condition of approval could be added by an entitle- ment body which would stipulate that the final project at the time of recordation of a record map and/or issuance of building permits; which- ever occurred sooner, .would be in compliance with the ultimate determina- tion to retain or delete the Lake Street extension. These policies are offered as possible alternatives to allow a certain amount of work to be accomplished on the necessary plans after entitlement without undue delay; however, I would like to reiterate that there is certainly a great deal of risk to be taken by the developer should the City Council adopt some or all of these policies., espectfully submitted, ames W. Palin sting Planning Director JWP:df IL v , , Ar !EaI.TION ' We the undersign do petition The City of Huntington Beach and the Administrator to take corrective measures on the environmental impact change do to the new houseing and the opening of Newland Street as a major thorough fare. The additional flow of foot,bicycle and auto traffic is causing noise pollution and is an _invasion- of, privacy. ' After a long private study, there seems to be. only one sollution, a wall on the west side of Newland, between Yorktown and Bridge- port, the same as the one on the east side of the street. At this time it -would only seem fair and just for UThe City" to cede back the property that was to be used for a drainage ditch that never came to be. Presently the. open land is a nuisance to weeds, trash and ,you name it. Since this land was and still not .used.. for the original intended purpose, we as property owners were ,not able to do 'a good job. of` landscaping. We are petitioning the city to rein- state our property and install: a. wall and .sidewalk. Any other alternative would be undesireable in cost and main- tenance by both city and property owners. Respectfully- 1 NAME ADDRESS .e "i �Lzl i Z/ 10) 11 ,(tee (✓ ��,� -�J ✓/ (•t.!';/��(��f-� �(ir_C• -� II) � lf:'/'c,,� � L-• �•j .jay (%�. .,, / � /�•% i� Air ° 10 � � Q � � ®® CI TV INTER-13,EPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONJAN 31 1978 HUNTINGWN UACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Floyd G. Belsito From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Director of Finance �ubjeci 'Financial impact .Report Date January 30, 1978 Newland Street Sidewalk and 'BIockwall ln ,xesponse to a request from the.?ub11c,Works DepartmeAt to prepare a Financial Impact Report on the above subject; . . am submitting the attached. At the present time there are funds available iri -the 'Gas Tax Fund and in the City°s contingency account (101593) which may be used for this project if the City Council so desires. The current balance in the contingency account would be $236,597.04 (if this request for $27,500.00 of contingency monies is approved. The balance of $11 ,000.00 will come from the Gas Tax Fund) . It is my recommendation that this project be considered for fund.ing in the 1978-79 budget. d F. B. Arguello Director of Finance, FBA/EH/cg cc: H. E. Hartge, Director, Public Works a Cr t, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT I� Project Name Newland Street Sidewalk and Blockwall Description Construct 1 ,100 feet of sidewalk and 1 ,100 feet of six foot high block wall along Newland St. between Yorktown Ave. and Bridgeport Lane. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs an urn. , ac . - Acquisition Construction ties, E ail2ment Other Total Cost $ 389500.00 $ 38,500.60 . 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs Additional. Materials Outside. Pa roll Personnel S u2p1i SS Services Revenues Total Cos. . 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs Annual maintenance would be included in the budget. . Since the City. has title to this property and. if it is vacated and deeded back to .the adjacent property owners, it would goon the tax rolls and .the City's property tax revenue would increase based on the value the Assessors Office would establish. 2. INDIRECT COSTS None Financial Impact Report r Page 2 l 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS None �.���-._. __ .._.•_ -- — ...- -- - --- ._.. . - ------ — . --- - -- 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT The elimination of an eyesore on Newland Street. 5. PROJECT USAGE Property owners along Newland between Yorktown Ave. and Bridgeport . Lane.: 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Approximately 30 days. after award of contract which will be aperox'imately 120 days from date project is approved.. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT None - with the uncertainty resulting from the Jarvis Initiative, it might be advisable to consider this in next year's budget and to maximize funds from this year's budget that could be used next year. 15 r'ebruary 14 , 1978 THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS : The temporary closing of Frankfort Avenue in Old Town at Indianapolis due to the slippage of the street on the cliff side has proved a blessing in disguise to the residents who live on Frankfort, as well as to the residents of Huntington Shore- cliff Mobile Park, We feel that now is the time to act on a problem that has plagued us for several years. Several residents have admitted that they have complained to the City in years past about the excessive traffic and speeds, but nothing was accomplished. At this time, we are joining together in order to convince the City that Frankfort Avenue should be closed permanently at Indianapolis. Accidents on Frankfort Avenue are far too numerous for a residential street. Several residents' vehicles have been hit while parked in front of their homes. Unreported accidents on the street are numerous. Three weeks ago, shortly before the temporary closing of Frankfort, two motorcyclists, racing down the street, spun out on the curve. One young man sought emergency aid at a hospital and both cycles were totaled. The noise level is so loud from the excessive traffic that we cannot hear our T.V. 1s or stereos at normal levels. It is impossible to open our windows or doors in summer weather because of the noise. We find it difficult to sleep before 11 p.m. or midnight and after 6 a.m. Residents who wish to park in front of their homes risk an accident everytime they slow down to park because of tailgators and speeders.. "Opening a car door is dangerous because the street is curved and most cars cannot be seen until you are practically "on top of them" or they are "on top of you". The intersection at Beach/Indianapolis/Frankfort is hazardous as explained in the Petition. Traffic coming out of Hilltop Liquor parking lot wishing to cut across to Frankfort (as is common) must see almost simultaneously on-coming traffic coming west on Indianapolis, east on Indianapolis, turning right from N. Beach Blvd,, as well as traffic turning left from S. Beach Blvd, and anyone turning west onto Indianapolis from'Frankfort. The intersection is confusing. Therefore, to avoid unnecessary costs in repairing the street for through and heavy traffic, we are suggesting that Frankfort be closed. There should be no problem in closing the street. It has been temporarily closed for two weeks and those who were using it as a short cut and thoroughfare through town have already adjusted to the change and are taking other, more appropriate routes. Commercial truckers servicing the business district .of Old Town must use the more commercial routes to Beach Blvd. instead of ruining a beautiful, ocean-view residential street. Charlotte R. Hi ner Q 605 Frankfort Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-4154 1 ' February 10, 1978 TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL PETITION We, the residents of Frankfort Avenue in Huntington Beach, would like to suggest to the City Council and the Planning Department that Frankfort Avenue be closed permanently at Indianapolis Avenue. The reasons are as follows: - ----- ---------- ----- 1) Frankfort Avenue is zoned residential and should not be used as a commercial thoroughfare through town. The noise pollution from commercial vbhicles and the excessive speeds of the cars and motorcycles is unbearable. 2) The tonnage of the commercial vehicles may weaken the underpinnings of the street- even further, since the street does run along a cliff. 3) The residents on the street as well as the residents of Huntington Shorecliff Mobile Park.should not feel that they are risking their lives when they have to slow down to park or to enter the Shorecliff Community. 4) The standard- speed limit on a residential street is 25 mph. That speed limit cannot possibly be enforced without 24 hour police attention. Frankfort Avenue is a practically stop-free short cut to Beach Blvd. and just about everyone in town knows it and takes advantage of it. 5) The intersection at-Beach/Indianapolis/Frankfort is hazardous. Traffic traveling West on Indianapolis wishing to turn left onto Frankfort often put their left-turn signal on- before crossing through the Beach Blvd. intersection, thus confusing left turn drivers coming from the opposite direction. Also, drivers attempting to turn-left-onto Frankfort often hold up traffic into the intersection at Beach. Blvd. 6) Traffic coming out of Hilltop Liquor parking lot. also adds to the general confusion. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER �--� . s F� S 3 — c 6G � 3 b`z " I U S RA VA Ec FO RT d y E. s 3 6 -8d 5-(, CY .3tllldly, . continued: PETITION TO CLOSE FRANKFORT AVENUE AT INDIANAPOLIS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER lie fla 103 /� fv� .3i ��,- Pr �rH ��� r-�- ��r�zTloN We the undersign do petition The City of Huntington Beach and the Administrator to take corrective measures on the environmental impact change do to the new houseing and the opening of Newland Street as a major thorough fare. The additional flow of f oot,bicycle and auto traffic is causing noise pollution and is an invasion ''f, privac . 'After a Iong private study, there seems to be only one solution, a wall on the west side of Newland,, between Yorktown and Bridge- port, the same as the one on the east side of the street. At this time it would only seem fair and just for !The City" to cede back the property that was to be used for a drainage ditch that never came to be. Presently the open } land is a nuisance to. weeds,: ' trash and you name it. Since f this land .was and still. not used for the original intended .purpose, we as property owners were notable to do a good job of landscaping. We are petitioning the city to rein- state our property and install a wall .and sidewalk. Any- other alternative would be undesireable in cost and main- tenance by' both city and property owners_. . Respectfully- • NAPIE ADDRESS ,f;2 4) >>� 10) y 4 + 7 • D �� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION JAN 31 1978 HUNTMIGTM TEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICr_ To Floyd G. Belsito From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Director of Finance Subject Financial Impact Report - Date January 30, 1978 Newland Street Sidewalk and Blockwall In response to a request from the Public Works Department to prepare a Financial Impact Report on the above subject, I am submitting the attached. At the present time there are funds available in the Gas Tax Fund and in the City's contingency account (101593) which may be used for this project if the City Council so desires. The current balance in the contingency account would be $236,597.04 (if this request for $27,500.00 of contingency monies is approved. The balance of $11 ,000.00 will come from the Gas Tax Fund) . It is my recommendation that this project be considered for funding in the 1978-79 budget. F. B. Arguello Director of Finance, FBA/EH/cg cc: H. E. Hartge, Director, Public Works J" CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Newland Street Sidewalk and Blockwall Description Construct 1 ,100 feet of sidewalk and 1 ,100 feet of six foot high block wall along Newland St. between Yorktown Ave. and Bridgeport Lane. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT .COSTS 1 .1 One-Time Costs Land urn. , ac - Acquisition Construction ties, Equipment Other. Total Cost $ 38,500.00. $ 38,500.00 1 .2 Recurring Annual .Costs Additional_• Materials' S. utside Payroll Personnel supplies Services .Revenues Total Costl 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs Annual maintenance would be included in the budget. Since the City has title to this property and if it is vacated and deeded back to the adjacent property owners, . it would goon the tax rolls and the City's property tax revenue would increase based on the value the Assessor's Office would establish. 2. INDIRECT COSTS None r F i nanc i a l Impact Repor Page 2 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS None 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT The elimination of an eyesore on Newland. Street. 5. PROJECT USAGE Property owners along Newland between Yorktown Ave. and Bridgeport .Lane. 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Approximately 30 days after award of contract which will be approximately 120 days from date project is approved. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT None - with the uncertainty resulting from the Jarvis Initiative, it might be advisable to consider this in next year's budget and to maximize funds from this year's budget that could be used next year. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT "COMMUNICATION CITY 0i- I;(!ii;ii�i HUNTINGTON RIM - A PI'villliC"!7-"{IVi: olrrwr. To Bud Belsito From H. E. Hartge Subject Closure of Frankfort Ave. at Date February 16., 1978 . Indianapolis St. The intensity and duration of recent rainfall together with gopher holes at critical locations created a failure in the subsurface of Frankfort Avenue west of Indianapolis- Street. The failure manifested itself on the street surface by causing the asphalt to literally sink 18 inches below its normal elevation. In addition, the subsurface failure resulted in heavy erosion of the south embankment of Frankfort Avenue causing water and mud to ,wash d.own :the steep =slope toward the existing mobile home park adjacent to. Frankfort Avenue. The first order of business was to isolate Frankfort Avenue from vehicular traffic between Indianapolis Street and Hill Street. Following this emergency closure the soils engineering firm of H. V. Lawmaster was retained to drill 6 holes, each 15 feet -deep within Frankfort Avenue to determine the condition and moisture content of the subsurface soils. The results of these tests showed that the -soils were of a good qaulity but heavily saturated with water which suggested they were not properly compacted during construction of the embankment. In discussing the problem at a staff meeting, it was determined that the existing roadway should be narrowed, perhaps 4 to 6 feet and, further, that it would be advisable at this time to cul-de-sac the easterly end of Frankfort Avenue as it approaches Indianapolis Street. When the suggested closure was discussed with one of the residents on Frankfort Avenue, he offered to obtain .opinion from his neighbors. The petition recently submitted to the City by the residents of Frankfort Avenue requesting its closure is the result of this initial contact. On February 1, 1978 the -City Engineer submitted a memorandum to the Planning Director requesting that a precise plan showing a cul-de-sac closure of Frankfort Avenue at Indianapolis be prepared and that the legal process of street closure be instigated. The petition from Frankfort Avenue residents dated February 10, 1978 is the latest action involving this subject. . H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:MZ : jy r' , �— D) W [�-.: Ju CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ! ' i r; i INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION CITY OF 1I0NIMJ''N C!I IIUNIINCION RIn(11 - ADM1,N!S1i?1A 1V1_ To Floyd G. Belsito From Edward D. Selich� City Administrator Planning Director Subject PETITION TO CLOSE FRANKFORT AVE . Date February 17, 1978 The request to close Frankfort Avenue may have some merit. However, such a move would probably affect more residences than those on Frankfort. Thus, I would suggest that if the City Council is desirous of pursuing this the Planning Commission should be directed to initiate a Precise Plan of Street Alignment for the closure of Frankfort Avenue. This would require public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council and notification of all affected property owners. EDS :ja • i • CITY OF HunTin(; Ton BEACH J� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 c TO: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator 'D (� FROM: Edward D. Selich, Planning Director DATE:. September 9, 1977 ri SUBJECT: VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO HEIL AVENUE FOR A PORTION OF?V) LOT 1, TRACT 3622 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: 1t A Mr. G. L. Schultz , the property owner of the easterly half of Lo 1 of Final Tract 3622, .is requesting that the City Council relinquish vehicular access rights to the property in order to allow for development. Lot 1 was originally created by recordation of Tract 3622 on May 5,. 1960 . The developer of the tract, Alcoa Pacific Construction, Inc. , created the division of Lot 1 into two parcels .by grant deed conveyance for the westerly half of Lot 1 on September 8 , 1960. The lot division was not done in accord with City subdivision procedure and is not recognized as a legal building site. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Deny the request for the following reasons: 1. The property was not properly subdivided and does not meet City standards for a 'building site. 2 . The granting of vehicular access rights would create a traffic hazard on Heil Avenue. ANALYSIS: This division of land is not in conformance with the ordinances in effect at the time of the grant deed. Pursuant to Section 9700 .4 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, :'.it is unlawful for any firm, individual, or association to divide for purposes of sale or contract of sale any land within the City of Huntington Beach unless and until all requirements of the ordinance are complied with. Section 9721 required that, prior to a division of four or less parcels, a map shall be submitted to the City for approval action. On August 16, 1976, Mr. Schultz filed with the City of Huntington Beach Tentative Parcel Map No. 76-34 to legalize the division and create a building site) r y 1 p � EOWE 1 � 197 f CITY OF HUNTI N E, C ADMIN!STRA.T E OFFICI Page 2 ---- ---- ---- -- ---- ------- -- ------------------------------—--- NAfter investigation and review_by the_Planning Department -and the Department of Public Works, it was determined that the creation of this parcel as a legal building site would not be in the best interests of the City. To do so would create a landlocked parcel as the proponent had not acquired vehicular access over and acrb9s the westerly portion of Lot 1. The Board of Zoning Adjustments therefore denied the tentative parcel map at its September 8 , 1976, meeting. However, the Board did advise Mr. Schultz that, as the vehicular access rights had been vested in the City of Huntington Beach and accepted by the City Council, the proper procedure- would be to file a request with the Council for relinquishment of such access rights. The Board also expressed concern that relinquishment of vehicular access would allow development of a single family home which would have a garage entered directly from Heil Avenue and create a traffic hazard by backing into the flow of traffic on Heil. ALTERNATIVES: If the Council wishes to grant vehicular access staff should be directed to prepare a resolution waiving vehicular access rights . If this alternative is desired by the Council it is recommended that the resolution provide that sufficient vehicular maneuvering area be provided on site to eliminate the need for backing into the Heil Avenue traffic flow. Respectfully submitted, Edward D. Selich Director EDS : ja Attachments: 1. Letter from Mr . Schultz dated November 1, 1976 2 . Assessor ' s Map 4y 74 Av Ar. ele lip 77 z7 SUNnNGM BEACH 7J4 PIANNING DEPARTMENT V JUN 2 3 1977 P. 0. Baal 190 �+ /Huf in*n BAach, Calif. pg3&^ 119 3 , 4 Q S ' MINUTES Administrative Annex, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Monday, Janaury 21 , 1974 Mayor Matney called the adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 4 5:30 P.M. ROLL CALL RONNEX Councilmen Present: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney Gibbs (arrived 5:35 P.M. ) Green (arrived 5:45 P.M. ) Duke(arrived 5:40 P. Councilmen Absent: None PROGRESS REPORT - TALBERT AVENUE RELOCATION **The _, Director of Public Works presented a progress report on the Talbert Avenue Relocation and the study on the matter which had been conducted by the Planning Department, Department of Public Works'and the firm of Herman Kimmel & Associates, Inc. **Mr. Edward Selich, Senior Planner, made a presentation regarding the realignment t and presented chart Irelative to the Circulation and transportation Study. A report entitled "Circulation and Transportation Study Parameters - September 1 ;' 1973" and a map were distributed to the Council . **Mr. Ralph Levya, Traffic Engineer, reported on the matte realignment and informed Council of the criteria used by Herman Kimmel and Associates in making the evaluation of of the anticipated traffic situation. He displayed charts and maps relating to the matter for Counci 1 ' s i nformati n,.J **The Director of Public Works again addressed Council and stated that this presentation had been made to bring Council up to date on the studies\which had been conducted and informed Council thAt an Environmental Impact Report or Exemption Dellaration would be required. *BDiscussion was held between the Council and staff regarding this phase of the study and the information which will be presented in Phase II of the study. **A motion was made by Councilman Green to delete Talbert Avenue from Gothard to Edwards Street and to directeT the Department of Public Works to report back to Council with a plan f handling the traffic which would have been handled by Talbert Avenue, on to Slater or Ellis Avenues. **Discussion was h,�ld'�and the City Attorney reported on the matter. **The motion made by Councilman Green was then withdrawn. **On motion by Green, Council directed that it be the policy of the City Council that Talbert Avenue not go through from Gothard xRS _Street to Edwards Street and d further directed the Planning Commission to take immediate steps to study this proposal for further report t Council . The motion was passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: All NOES: Councilmen: None ABSFNT: Councilmen: None CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION . STUDY PARAMETERS EPT hunTingfon beach • california 1 , planning department i � Y I CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY . i PARAMETERS • i SEC . 1 .0 Introduction 1 . 1 Route 1 Freeway 1 . 2 Route 39 Freeway 1.. 3 Bolsa Bay 1 . 4 State Guidelines 1 . 5 County Transportation Corridor Study 1 . 6 Consultant Assistance SEC 2 . 0 Study Objectives SEC 3 . 0 General Criteria 3. 1 Study Area 3.. 2 Horizon Year 3. 3 Land Use and Circulation i 3. 4 Completion Date SEC 4.0 Study Parameters 4. 1 Methodology 4. 2 Top and Second Level Issues i 4 . 2 . 1 Top Level Issues 4. 2 .2 Second Level Issues . 4 . 2 . 3 Top and Second Level Issue Sets 4 . 3 Third Level Issues 4. 4 Mass Transit Issues 4 ._4 . 1 Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way 4 . 4. 2 Coastal .Transportation Corridor .4 . 5 Bicycle Trails SEC 5 . 0 Appendix S. 1 State Legislation 5. 2 State Guidelines i i SEC 1 . 0. Introduction Since the last evaluation of the City.'s circulation element to. i the General P..lan -'(i .e. Master Plan. of. Arterial Streets and Highways) s.everal. significant factors have come about which call. for a reevaluation. SEC 1 . 1 Route 1 Freeway Perhaps the :most significant is the deletion of the Route 1 Freeway. In August of 1972 the State legislature deleted this route from the State Freeway System. Shown on ' the present Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways the freeway was ..an integral part of th.is .plan:! Deletion of the freeway has .a significant impact on the presently planned arterial street system. SEC 1 . 2 Route 39 Freeway In 1972 the State Division of . Highways re-opened the study of the Route. 3.9 Freeway alignment. Presently indicated on the Master Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways to tie into the Route 1 Freeway any realignment and terminus could significantly impact, the arterial street system. i SEC. 1 .3 Bolsa Bay In 1973 an agreement was reached between Signal Bolsa Corporation and .the State of California on the Tidelands in Bolsa Bay . The - agreement provided for .the possibility of an ocean access point at .Pacific Coast Highway within 14 years . Assuming .this access point to be used for watercraft and providing a crossinz at, . Pacific Coast. Highway unfeasible , the major coastal traffic corridor would effectively be cut off and some alternative found. 1 . i SEC 1 . 4 State Guidelines . The , Governor.' s Council on .Intergovernmental Relations is developing guidelines on all required elements: - of the General. Plan. The guidelines for the , Circulation Element have significantly .cha.nged its scope. Previously focusing on vehicular traffic circulation the guidelines. .now. call for a "balanced circulation system taking full advantage of the entire complement of. modes of passenger and commodity movement available for the purpose of the state". With these guidelines the Circulation Element now takes a different . . stature than it has in the past. SEC 1 . 5 County Transportation Corridor Study In July of 1973 the Orange . County Board of Supervisors gave approval to a county wide transportation corridor study. The deleted Route 1 Freeway has. been designated as a transportation corridor and cities lying within its route are participating in the study. The county has _been divided into zones and. the area between the San Diego Freeway and the coastline has be"en" designated as ,,.the Coastal Zone and is the top priority for the study . SEC 1 . 6 Consultant Assistance To assist in revising the Circulation Element (Master Plan of j Arterial Streets and Highways) and the Land Use Element (Master . Plan of. Land Use) 'and evaluate some specific circulation problems the Planning Department has retained Herman Kimmel and Associates" to assist in the performance of a Circulation and Transportation Study. - This report sets forth the. methodology of de.riving.-the' parameters of this study. 2 I SEC 2 . 0 Study Objectives In .conjunction with Land Use Studies for the General Plan this study will evaluate major transportation alternatives for Huntington Beach. In- addition, certain specific problem areas wi1_1 also be evaluated. Output of this study will constitute significant input to ;the Land -Use, and Circulation Elements SEC 3. 0 General Criteria SEC " 3. 1 Study Area The study area is adepicted in Figure 3.. 1 and is generally that':" area between the Pacific Coast Freeway Route and the beach , and the area between Beach Boulevard; Warner Avenue and the Route. l' - Freeway alignment. This was selected since all the major alterna- tives are concentrated in this area. SEC 3. 2 Horizon Year For the .'purposes of this study no definite horizon year was selected. but assumed that all lands "would be at their ultima""te .4evelopment based upon projected land uses . SEC : 3. 3, Land Use and Circulation The existing Master Plan of Land Use for study areas A, B, .and "C are the assumed land use patterns . Those portions of area C .in the Bolsa Chica Master Plan: area, the lower .portion of area B (below Ellis) : and ahe .expans-ion area for. Huntington Central Park are excluded: Land ,use for these areas and area D will be assumptions set forth by. the Planning Department and as. indicated in •F gure- 3 . 2 land use assumptions . This figure represents , a planning staff analysis of: current is sues .and an .estimate of probable land uses-: i CITY. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9-1-73 :::ft.. - --: AOL . M.M... ::: , ..,*... 1.►•.• •...• ... m, Study Area Sphere of Influence _ qy FIGURE 3-1 CIRCULATION AND." TRANSPORTATION STUDY STUDY AREA BOUNDARY:. . 4 Referring to Figure 3-2 the following was generally assumed for. the :.purposes of this study: 1 . - Chica State Beach Developed to the .intensively..us.e.d regional recreation facility. 2`: Bolsa Chica Wildl-ife Preserve Assumed that 230 acres .in` addition to the. present -300 will go to the state . fot a combination wildlife preserve and public marina: 3: Bolsa Chica "Gap" = Low density residential marina develop- ment not to exceed 8 . units/acre. 4 Bolsa Chica Master Plan - Submitted Signal Bols.a. Corp. Master Plan and. tentative tract which is a combination of residential and commercial development. 5 . Central Park Expansion It was assumed that twenty additional " acres would ,go to he. park and the remaining 40 to . Elli would be low density open space concept housing (large lots or P.D. not to exceed 4 units/acre) . 6 Open Space Concept Residential - Assumed to be open .space.. • i concept residential development (low density not to. exceed 4 units/acre) , either large lots or P. D. development 7 : Seacliff. Planned Community - All Seacliff.• development west- of Goldenwest Street was assumed to the current Master :Plan as, revised this :year. 8. .-Huntington Pac-ific- Corp. 'Beach =- Assumed to be. a state beach . recreation facility, . . . .9. Signal .-Lease - Was assumed' to .remain in oil production for the 'pur,poses of this study ; 5 10 . Town Lot Area - Assumed to be a combination of low, medium, i and .medium`high density residential uses and commercial development . 11 : . . Top of Pier - The Top .of Pier Plan was used except . that . the parking authority expansion was assumed to be- general commercial west of Lake and part of a convention center east of Lake. 12 . . Civic Center Area - The area around the Civic Center was assumed to be an intensive use area consisting of'. commercal , office and residential development: i 13 : Beach Blvd: Strip Commercial - The strip commercial -on Beach Boulevard south of Ellis was assumed to be reduced 50% 14 . Old- Huntington Beach. - Remainder of original town area assumed to . be a combination of low and medium . density residential development. 15 . . Southwest Ellis and Beach - Combination of residential and ' commercial development. 16. Pacifica Hospital Area - Assumed to be. concentra-t.ion medical . offices and related facilities . 1.7 . Lower Central .Industrial - Assumed to . be light industrial development except for southwest corner of Goldenwest and Garfield which was assume.d. to be in oil production. 18 . Taylor. and Beach Special- Study Area - Assumed to .be light industrial , park and commercial uses. A more .detailed map at the scale of 1 = 1000" was prepared for the study. It depicts land use assumptions in- greater detail and acreages of .each. i _L? r - CITY OF 1 1 .,HUNTINGTON :BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CAL•IFORMA ! 9-1-73 STUDY AREA 1 --- �`^� C I . STUDY AREA t � J V I B - I L L-_J 18 I 1 2 3 5 /i 15/ I / 12 �13 8 � 14 ; STUDY AREA ; q 10 A r � ' i FIGUE 3- ' CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY LAND USE ISSUES 7 i SEC 3. 4 Completion Date Completion date is to be coordinated with Land Use Studies and is tentatively set for the first of December, 1973, SEC 4 . 0 Study Parameters SEC 4 . 1 Methodology The basic methodology is to arrange the many alternatives possible into a series of alternative sets . The approach was to start from the : most general and work to the specifics . Three issue levels were identified and alternatives thereby developed. In addition to these some major pub lic•. mass transit and bicycle trail issues were added for consideration. SEC 4 . 2 Top and Second Level Issues SEC 4 . 2 . 1 Tom Level Issues The coastal transportation corridor was determined to be the most general issue facing Huntington Beach. Defined as a multi-modal corridor accommodating. , varied forms of transportation such as the automobile., i bike trails , equestrian trails , and -mass transit , the outcome of the . study could have a significant impact on transportation facilities in Huntington Beach. For the purposes of this study it was assumed that two conceivable situations could occur ; a multi-modal corridor that would .generally fall along the Route 1 Freeway alignment or no transportation corridor 'or freeway parallel to the coast between the San Diego Freeway and coastline . Each .of these situations would call for solutions different .from past plans based on the Route 1 Freeway. 8 SEC 4 . 2 . 2 Second Level. Issues Two second level issues were identified as' being significant but not. as overiding .as- the coastal transportation corridor. These. are the ocean -cut in Bolsa Bay and the Route 39. Freeway. a. Route 39 Freeway The Route 39 Freeway. is presently the only `freeway. left to develop in Huntington Beach. With the alignment study being reopened there ar'e two potential alignments as depicted in Figure 4-1 . The present planned terminus is in the vicinity of the- . junction with the former Route 1 Freeway. However the City' s policy . is for the freeway not to terminate at i this point. There are two possible situations , I that were assumed for this study. One is that. the freeway would occur in either of the - alignments in Figure 4-1 . The scope of this study . is such that either alignment may be ., treated equally. The other .is that the Route 39 Freeway would be deleted as the Route 1* was . This .'assumes that no transportation corridor is subsequently designated for that i route . . b . Bolsa Bay Ocean Cut As mentioned, in the. introduction the potential of an ocean cut at .Coast Highway in Bolsa i 9 -rT e. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH \ ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA . 9-I-73 � I V. . I �n \ y� fill ---- --— - - - - . Adopted Alignments MIEN Alternate Alignment o C'�q2 I FIGURE 4- 1 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY 'ALTERNATE ROUTE 39 FREEWAY ALIGNMENTS 10 would significantly affect Huntington Beach . . The impact increases if there is no other: . coastal transportation artery than Pacific Coast Highway. Again two potential situations were identified, with or without the ocean cut each having varying significance that is dependent upon other top and second level issues . SEC 4. 2 . 3 Top and Second Level Issue Sets Figure 4-2 indicates the top and second issues and. how eight different issue sets .were derived. Each of these sets presents a" unique transportation picture. for- Huntington Beach. Issue sets 1-a to 1-d assume a multi modal coastal transportation _ corridor and sets 2-a to 2-d assume no corridor. a. Issue Set 1-a This set assumes the following situation as indicated in Figure 4-3 : i a) A multi-modal coastal transportation corridor generally following the Route 1 Freeway alignment. b) The Route . 39 Freeway. will. be constructed to Pacific Coast Highway. c) Pacific Coast Highway will follow its _ ' . present general route uninterrupted by an ocean cut. 11 . . ROUTE 39 FREEWAY A NO - OCEAN CUT COASTAL TRANSPORTATION 1 . / CORRIDOR ROUTE 39 FREEWAY ' OCEAN CUT FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL / ISSUES NO ROUTE 39 FREEWAY C NO OCEAN CUT NO COASTAL 2 TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR NO ROUTE 39 FREEWAY D OCEAN CUT • i I CITY OF. HUNTINGTON BEACH ui ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA I 9I73 A'q O ! ' I I o to, VA FIGURE 4- 3 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND. SECOND LEVEL ISSUES: SET 1-A . 13. i b. Issue Set 1-b Figure 4-4 indicates the following assumptions : a) A multi-modal coastal transportation corridor generally following the Route 1 . Freeway alignment. b) The Route 39 Freeway will be constructed . i to Pacific Coast Highway. c) An ocean will interrupt Pacific Coast Highway and some alternate must be found:. C. Issue Set 1-c As indicated in Figure 4-S. the following assumptions are made : a) A multi-modal coastal transportation corridor generally following the Route 1 Freeway alignment. b) The Route 39 Freeway will not be constructed. c) Pacific Coast Highway will follow its present general route uninterrupted by. . an ocean cut. d. Issue Set 1-d The following is assumed for this issue set as depicted in Figure 4-6 : a) A multi-modal coastal transportation corridor generally following. the Route 1 Freeway alignment. b). The Route 39 Freeway will not be constructed. 14 , LL CITY OF. M HUNTINGTON BEACH H ORANGE COUNTY CAUFORNIA.. -^ - 9-1-73 I No o .00EAN CUT', nj Y - r � y�,lgY .FIGURE 4-4 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY n � TOP AND SECOND .LEVEL.`ISSUES:,,' SET 1-B " 15 CITY OF HUNTINGTON .BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9-1-73 11= nJ Fq� - - i FIGURE 4- 5 CIRCULATION AND TRAN PORTATION STUDY �= TOP ANDSECOND -LEVEL iSSUES�'.SET T. C 16 CITY..OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9-1-73 a'P OCEAN CUT -o ,p � J - ��9y I .w °FIGURE 4- 6 . CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND .SECOND LEVEL ISSUES:` SET 1- D i c) An ocean cut will interrupt the present Pacific CoastHighway alignment ..and some alternative needed. e . Issue :Set 2-a Figure 4- 7 assumes the following : a) No coastal transportation corridor or Route 1 Freeway. b) The Route 39 Freeway -be constructed to Pacific Coast Highway. i 01 Pacific Coast Highway will follow. its, present general route uninterrupted by an ocean cut. f. Issue Set 2-b Figure 4-8 depicts the assumptions for this i set as follows : a) No coastal transportation corridor or Route 1 Freeway.. b) The Route 39 Freeway will be. constructed to Pacific. Coast Highway . c) An ocean cut .will interrupt the present Pacific Coast Highway alignment and some. alternative needed. g. Issue Set 2-c The following is assumed for .this set as depicted in Figure 4-9 :. a) No. coastal transportation corridor_ or Route 1 Freeway. . 18 i 3 LL i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH " N ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9=1-73 1 . ti�cy .�q r _ FIGURE '4- 7 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND SECOND LEVEL` ISSUES SET 2='A 19 ' U. o• CITY OF . "' HUNTINGTON BEACH LLI .I ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 0 ' 9-1-73 i OCEAN CUT f .._ y�cy� 4y FIGURE 4- 8 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND ;SECONDLEVEWSSUES:. SET 2-B CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 9-1-73 a Az --- -AL -- ----- -- i FIGURE 4- 9 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND SECOND LEVEL ISSUES: --SET 2-'C 21 i b) The Route 39 Freeway will not 'be constructed . c) Pacific Coast Highway will follow its present general alignment .uninterrupt.ed. i by an ocean cut. h . Issue Set 2-d The final issue set assumes the following as i indicated in Figure 4-10 : i a) No coastal transportation corridor or i Route 1 Freeway. b) The Route 39 Freeway will not be constructed. c) An ocean cut will interrupt the present general Pacific Coast Highway alignment { and some alternative needed. SEC 4 . 3 Third Level Issues The following eleven specific problem areas were selected for evaluation in this study. In addition each was given a high or i low priority rating for evaluation. The higher priority items will be evaluated before the lower priorities . The results of I these evaluations will be valuable inputs to other planning studies . I The following issues are illustrated in Figure 4-11 : 1 . Slater/Graham - evaluation of the street alignments and arterial classification. 2 Talbert/Springdale - evaluation of the street alignments and arterial classification. 3. Talbert Avenue and Ellis Avenue Alignment in Huntington Central Park Area - evaluation of the need for Talbert Avenue to continue through the park and possible realignment of Talbert to connect with Ellis and go around the park. i 22 i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA ! �I 9-1-73: - :��,��-ter i �•- OCEAN =1 CUT ` - s . Fq2 . � e • y�cy �qy - FIGURE 4- 10 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY TOP AND SECOND LEVEL ISSUES SET 2 D 2 3': i z CITY. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 10 ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA :z - I 9-1-73 1 - � -• - _ 8 1 ' �Y ■2 6 1 o _ FIGURE 4- 11 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION ,STUDY THIRD LEVEL ISSUES ::SPECIFIC PROBLEM AREAS 24 i i 4 . Lake.:and Gothard Alignment the. present Master Plan shows Lake - and Gothard Streets connecting at the intersection. of Garfield. and Main. Evaluation of the alignment of these two streets 5 Civic Center Area - The streets around the Civic Center need to. be evaluated for. alignment and street classification'. The: completion of the Civic Center and the Planning Commissions desire of a high - activity Civic Center require an evaluation. of- this. area including :Main Street , 17th Street, Adams ..Avenue and Mansion-Yorktown alignment. 6 Palm- Indianapolis Avenues=. The present Master Plan shows Palm. and Indianapolis Avenues connecting between Lake and Delaware. The alignment of these two streets needs to be evaluated. 7 . Orange-Olive Primary Couplet- With changes -that have occurred regarding the Townlot Area (Specific Plan Study) the need for . this. couplet is to be evaluated. 8. Five Points - This intersection should be looked at for possible alternatives to the 5 leg intersection. 9.: Edwards Street - Talbert to Garfield Avenues A realignment of. Edwards Street either on top of or at the toe of the bluff needs to be evaluated. 10 . McFadden " - West of Graham- Impact of deleting McFadden as a through arterial to Bolsa Chica Street needs. to be. evaluated.. : 11. Edinger avenue - Planned to continue .through to Pacific Coast. i Highway this needs to be evaluated for alignment possibilities and impact if it does not go through to Pacific. Coast Highway: 25 12 . Route 39 Terminus - The latest State Department of Transporta- tion alignment shows the Route. 39 . Freeway ending on Beach` Boulevard south of Garfield. Alternative concepts need to be evaluated for terminating the freeway. TIie priorities are as follows Issues .3 - 4 .. 5 7 - 9 °12 High Issues. 1 -. 2 - 6 - 8 - 10 - 11 Low SEC 4 . 4 Mass Transit Issues Three , significant mass transit issues were identified for the consideration of. this study; the Southern Pacific Railroad right- of-way ; the coastal .multi-modal. transportation corridor (as it applies to mass transit) and bus service in Huntington Beach (local and regional) SEC . 4 . 4 . 1 Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way The city- is presently taking steps to abandon the. railroad south of Garfield Avenue However,. Orange ; County Transit District is presently studying the railroad as a mass transit corridor and the Planning Commission has expressed a desire to designate the railroad as a transportation corridor. The study will evaluate .the feasibility fo designating the. railroad as a transportation corridor.` SEC 4 . 4 . 2 Coasta.l. Transpo.rtation Corridor .'fhe study will evaluate, the mass transit implications of the coastal transportation corridor. Being. designated as a. multi=modal corridor this aspect. `_ must be evaluated. 26 i CITY'.OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA A 9-1-73 1 - I• o _ Coastal Multi-modal �F Transportation Corridor FIGURE 4-12 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY MASS TRANSIT ISSUES 27 SEC 4. 4 . 3 Bus Service There are presently three bus lines serving Huntington Beach, OCTD,. SCRTD, and Greyhound . Also, the Planning Commission has established a committee to do a study on a local transportation system that is based upon vehicles using the existing street system. This study will evaluate the impacts of the existing and proposed systems. on the arterial street. system. SEC -4 . 5 Bicycle Trails Another aspect of the Huntington Beach transportation picture is bicycle trails . The city is embarking upon a bicycle trail system that will be spread throughout the city. 60 miles of trails were proposed in the City' s preliminary Trails Element. Various programs are in different stages of completion. Most of the proposed trails share the street right of way with the automobile . If the current demand for bike trails continues most of' the arterial streets could be designated for bicycle trails . This situation presents potential problems and the need for further evaluation of the impact of on-street: bike trails upon the arterial street system 28 a � \ - � ■ ram _ _ CITY OF p HUNTING,TON" BEACH ` ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA - -�....._. 9- *MM WE EWE ■ ■ \', Existing O.C'.T.D. Routes �. tC ■ . Proposed O.C.T.D. Routes o 'roposzd Additions to 0.C.T.D. Routes t ;�l.tnr. J - .La CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY EXISTING/'PROPOSED: O.CT.D: ;ROUTES 29 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA . _ ♦ lH e.w f rrrr u - l_ L 9-1-73 ' " I �►NN�• R.T.D. Route -- C- Greyhound Route F /Depot 1 GURE 4- 14 CIRCULATION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY OTHER EXISTING BUS ROUTES 30 �.. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY'.. CALIFORNIA 9-1-73 m. - -. c� y Exist.ing Proposed. (Funded) owl - I�I i FIGURE 4- 15 An ('JR ULAVION AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY EXISTIN AN PR SED ON STRIrET 0,�Kf TR�Atk w SEC 5. 0 APPENDIX 5. 1 State Legislation 5. .65302. Elements Of Plan Required To Be Included. The general plan shall consist of a statement of development policies and shall include a- diagram or diagrams and. text setting forth objectives , principles , standards, and plan proposals. The. plan shall include the following elements: (a) A land use element which designates the proposed general .distribution and general location and extent-_of_ the ` uses of the land for housing, business , industry, open space , 'including agriculture , natural resources , recreation, and . enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public buildings and grounds , solid and liquid waste disposal facilities , and other categories of public and private uses of land. The land use element shall include a statement of the .standards of population density and building intensity recommended . , j for the various districts and other territory covered by the. plan. The land use element shall also identify areas covered . I by the plan which are subject to flooding and shall be. re- .viewed annually with respect to such areas. (b) A circulation element consisting of ,the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thorough- fares , transportation routes , terminals , and other local public utilities. and facilities , all correlated with the land_ use element of the plan. i .(c) A housing element con-sisting of standards and plans , for the improvement of. housing and for provision of adequate : .sites. for housing, This element of' the plan shall endeavor. to make adequate provision for the housing needs_ of all economic segments of the community. (d)' A conservation element for the conservation, develop- ment , and utilization of natural resources including water and its hydraulic force , forests ,, soils , 'rivers and other . waters , harbors, fisheries , wildlife , minerals , and other natural resources. That portion ..of - the conservation.element including waters shall be :developed in coordination -with any countywide water agency and with all district and city agencies i . 32• . . . , SEC S. 2 State Guideline (Draft) DRAFT: GUIDELINE. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CIRCULATION ELEr1ENT :OF A GENERAL. PIAN I. AUTHORITY A. The State of California Government Code Title 7 Chapter 3, Article .5, Subsection 65302 (b) authorizes and mandates a Circulation Element for all general plans. B. The preparation of guidelines .for..all General plan elements by the Council on Intergovernmental Relations is authorized . and mandated by. Section 3421.1.1 of the Government' Code. i IT. _ POLICY . It is the policy of the State of California to encourage the "proper functioning of city, county, district, and .regional planning," and specifically to encourage, through the pre paration of the Circulation Element, a balanced circulation system taking full advantage of the entire complement,. of , modes of passenger and commodity movement available jOr the purpose of protecting the health, safety and welfare of the people of the State. i III. DEFINITIONS i Circulation shall mean all those processes, and their combi.nafions, by which people -and goods move or are, moved between rind:within local planning a reas.. ..:'Modes,`'mean s, .or types of circulation may include the following which are further defined: A. Roadways .s}iall mean those improved and partially improved vehicular routes which may vary in availability to access and in intended speed of movement, from alleys, service and . access roads, and other special-purpose continuous access routes; through local, collector and arterial streets; and parkways, expressways and scenic highways designed for high speeds and limited access,...but with intersections at .grade; to high speed,limited access freeways with grade .separated intersections. B. Public..or mass transit shall mean those universally avail able carriers which may include belts, ramps; escalators, and. other specialized or innovative circulation mechanisms; 33 . . including -eo-called "personalized" mass transit systems; taxis, jitneys, mini-buses, dial-a-bus, and the. like; : bus and high. spp.ed fixed-rail systems within a discreet, con- tiguous service area; and harbors, airports and other ter- minals and facilities for the movement of people and goals between local planning areas. C. Paths and trails shall mean those unimproved, partially im- proved,. or •specialiy developed routes or portions of routes especially suitable for equestrian, .pedestrian, bicycle, motorized mini-bike or other related use. D. Special purpose conveyors shall mean pipelines, cables, transmission lines, and other such linkages between points of production and consumption. IV. THE SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF THE GUIDELINES The Guidelines are intended to clarify the intent of the State requirements related to. the Circulation Element of the Gen, . era]. Plan and establish minimum standards for compliance with the law where such compliance is a prerequisite to, state j action or assistance to local communities. Specifically, it is the purpose of the .Guidelines. to encourage local planning bodies to fully consider an adequate and comprehensive multi-modal circulation system appropriate to the community. The Guidelines are intended to be the yardstick against which local planning may be evaluated, subject to such variations as may be recognized as essential to protect and .extend local values. It is important that- the Circulation Element .con-- sider the physical structure, the social' ind institutional character, and the range of economic activities of the community. V. THE CIRCULATION ELaIENT IN RELATION TO THE GENERAL PLAN A. Land Use and Circulation are twin elements to be completely related to one another in any community general plan. The location, the density and intensity of land uses, their traffic generation, and. their required facilities must- be considered to provide for the safe and efficient flow. of people and cor.Lmodities in the several transportation modes included in the system. 1 B. The Circulation Element shall also include signifi-cant policy inputs from other general plan elements, and_ shal1 be a` i .34 planning; system framework to serve -as a context for the consideration of other subject areas. 1. Mandatory elements`-which 'may relate directly to _cir- j culati.on include: seismic safety, safety, open space, conservation, housing, noise, scenic highways, and . land use, 2. Optional elements which may'relate directly to ci-r- culation include: transportation, transit, street numbering-And recreation. VI. THE CIRCUTATION ELEMENT IN RELATION .TO ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS A: The manner in which the location, the design, the function, and .the use. of the components' of the circulation system modify the physical environment shall be-'considered in..the Circulation Element. B. The manner in which the. location, the design; the function and .the use of the components of the circulation system pro- vide access to the social, institutional and economic.acti= vities of the community, especially for such transportationally handicapped groups as the poor, the elderly, the young, and. the disabled, shall be considered in the Circulation Element. VII. THE CIRCUTAT.ION ELE1•IENT IN RELATION TO STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES A. The Circulation Element shall acknowledge and conform in every, respect with those circulation and transportation planning and administration relationships specified,``by'. California State law. B. There are governmental agencies at four levels, as.. well as the private sector, -whose interests in planning and im plementing a circulation system shall be identified. These levels are: 1. The Federal. Government in air, sea', rail`, highways, and. in mass transit, ' 2. The State Government is tail and highways. (at least) and in rights-of-way and easements ..for utilities. 3. The.County. Government in highways. 4. The City Government° in. h.i >hways streets, . trails and the various ,local easements and rights-of=way -for utihities 35` i C. Where appropriate, such agencies shall be invited. to par- ticipate in roles ranging from the actual design .-of the circulation 'sysLem to providing -financial assistance for rights-of-way, construction and maintenance: VIII. THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT IN. RELATION TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST A. The. State of California, and the public at large have an important interest in the planning and, development. of- the -circulation system as a prime determinant of..urban structure- of environmental quality, and of the health, safety and welfare of the citizenry.. B. The Criculation Element shall recognize the circulation , system is a prime determinant of the social and economic- viability of the .community, and that the public interest requires responsible consideration of. social, economic and natural resources in the preparation of the Circulation Element, C. It shall be recognized in the Circulation Element- that cer- tai.n'.f;roups and individuals with special circulation interests, and their representative associations, such as hiking, bicy- cling and equestrian clubs, may,posse.ss a special competence And expertise to participate in the circulation planning process. D. It. shall.be recognized in the Circulation Element that certain' transportationally-disadvantaged_, aged groups, such as. the poor, the elderly., the-young-and. the :handicapp-ed, have an abiding interest in participating in the planning .and pro vision of.a balanced, comprehensive, multi-modal circulation system. I i IX. THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENT . i The Circulation Element document shall include at least the following materials: .A. A statement of the circulation-related policies, goals and objectives. B. A description of the circulation system and its constituent modes for which the plan provides, and their relation hips and inter-.faces,. with special emphasis .on choices ofmodes, ! locations, aligaments,• designs, and social:-economic and;: enviro.imental. i.mnacts_ particular to .to 'the:. local planning body' s area of responsibility. 36 C. A specification..of the hierarchy_ of routes and modes within ..the circulation system, and•`their standards of design and , •improvgment. i i D. A diagram whichshall be conceptual .but .also .a physical, geographical description showing the existing modes within the circulation system, their locations, alignments; .ter- minals: and necessary facilities., their alignments, .hierarchy . and special uses and, _in,addition, the., general locations, . alignment§, terminals, and facilities necessary._ for p.ro posed additions or expansions to the circulation system. X. GENERAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE ELMIENT A. Essential data input: 1. California cities and •counties vary.widely in all factors u4iich significantly affect the choice, location, design, standards, and uses of a .circulation system and its com ponent modes: Within this variation the local:planning body needs 'to provide research -including, but not limited to: a. Social factors, such as: the character of the resi- dent and expected future population and its consti- tuent groups; the desirable level, route, and modal choice of .their work, shopping and recreational trips; the present adequacy of circulation service in avail- ability, level of service, modal .choice and modal. coordination; projected future needs; the implications of possible cultural changes, such as increased leisure time; the differential impact of alternative develop- ments, or extensions of the circulation system; and the process of the social obsolescence of transpor- tation modes. b. Economic factors such as: desirable present and pro- jected future location and concentration of economic activities and their required levels and types of circulation service; present inadequacies in circu- lation services; differential access and quality of circulation service and its effect on economic development; the ability of the local jurisdictions to raise funds. c. Physical factors such as: topography, geology, soils, hydrology and natural processes; the presence of bodies of water and other circulation impediments and resources; flora and fauna, and their habitats; air water and audial quality; visual and aesthetic quality; energy and natural resources; and the expected impacts of alternative developments, improvements, or . . extensions of the circulation system upon them. 37 i 2. . Datg available from the State and County governments and available from all other public agencies should be utilized in full. i B. Necessary public policy input: 1. The local planning body in conjunction with ciaizens, must determine the desired future character of their community, and optimal levels of transportation .services for areas and functions within the community. 2. Such determination may consist of specific goals,. poli- cies, and objectives to guide the maintenance, improvement, and development of .all appropriate circulation modes and modal inter-faces within a comprehensive community cir- culation system. . 3. Such policies shall be productive`.of desirabily coordinated systems not only 'within but between local planning jurisdictions. Co. Reference to related elements: With the Land Use Element, the Circulation Element is the foundation and culmination of the general plan system. It shall include significant policy inputs from all the other general plan elements as discussed in Part V. 'The...Circulation Element shall .be published simultaneously with at least the Land Use Element because of their highly -significant correlation in the determination of urban form. i D. Citizen Participation in the planning process: It is the virtue and -duty of local governments to create consensus on an efficient, comprehensive, and equitable' . . I multi-modal circulation system through the use of adequate and widely-representative citizen participation'. Inputs j will-.be required in at least four' identifiable areas 1. identification of circulation needs,. modes,= inter-xe- lationships,. locations, and standards of design and improvement of interest. 2. Formulat.ion of goals, objectives and policies. 3.. Establishment of priorities. 4. Formation and approval of projects for additions, to, extension, improvement, relocation,. or downgrading the circulation system or its components.. XI. EFFECTUATION OF THE CIRCULATION ELaIENT A. The Circulation Element with the Land Use Element .should be adopted as the foundation of the entire general ,plan. -Any. major change in the. Circulation Element .will.'.impact `heavily 38 upon all -of the other elements "of the plan. . Therefore, the .Cizculation Element and; the. entire general plan shall be compr©hensively and simultaneously reviewed at frequent intervals, not greater than ten years. . B. . The Circulation Element shall consider all acceptable sources of funds for the implementation of its proposals. Such sources may include: 1. The construction .and dedication of streets, paths, and trails as part of the land development process. 2. The use of Federal and States Highway Trust Fund monies in the.provision of freeways, expressways, thoroughfares., and arterials. 3. The use of funds from other Federal or state agencies for. the provision of such multi-dimensional facilities as harbors, airports, hiking, biking.and riding trails.. 4. Where appropriate, the use of_ fares" and. tariffs, sales taxes, property_ ;taxes, and other means at local_ ..discretion._ i I 39 I i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA -143 t I w, y o _ CIRCULATION AND . TRANSPORTATION STUDY 1 � N _3op . r+n CAam �2 E IMER aVE 2 2 I &0 33 is I HEIL AVE 3 2 I 23 Z - j 3z7 WhRNER AVE 1 2tqS Z �2 SLATER AVE ro 17 1 I Z 9s� T&BEFO AVE f 1 v3 a ELLIS AVE . . i 8 21 WIELD AVE CLAY ST. � a 14 ORKTOWP!AVE 19 3 � ' 17 SAVE � 1 , z it � s vw �� ���'• a��►' 6 s "TA AVE ZJ _A ° . I am RO e. 15 17 2D P 24 2G 24 M 21 js EDIMER AVE 04 L I b. 18 . Ito 14 14 15 HEIL AVE _ w N O � N � VN► � � .. 216 35 34 35 37 40 42 36 WARNER AVE 4 wti v 4� 2 m B 12 11 1.0 SLATER AVE 19 2I: TALBER'T AVE S 0 11 12 14 ELLIS AVE a -o y 25 RMt2 GARFIELD AVE ALA Y ST. 0UTOWN AVE s 5 v DAMS AVE to ej INDIWPOLIS IV ,�. r a17 14 CLANTA AVE. �`* 4�c, N mop . z � �^ `-.0 E� IMGER AVE 1 HEIL AVE 1 33 B 2 Z 1 4 $ WARIER AVE o 90� 3 3 0 z Z 7 l S i� Z SLATER AVE �09 Z i 4 I Z TALBERT AVE 3 ! 3 38 13 ELLIS AVE i g z27 16WELD AVE . a MY St 14 YORKTOWN AVE 3 S AVE `�• WDM FOLIS v� �1 ���'• ���, KUTA AVE Oda vJ�' ���� �`�• o�� Lu. W Lai. LLA 7 y d W h . �. d W AM aC H o" Q Lai W W � W J Z 0 W � � ccqq � LL O � W 57 = 50 R. 50.v, 4G, 41 W 39 . U c* 31 .a 29� 22 2 BEACH RA �nca N - b N 14 GOTNARP N � � 17 � ^919 15 i 2� 13 _ )o 17 N ti — N 6WENVESI R a& 3 3 2 9 25 23 23 21 19 18 �� `� g • Z� `44b�j 61 O y- ED' PS ST 17 . 15 13 1.5 N �sf �'oe . MWM ST. a N r 3� 32 27 `a a`"h GRAHAM ST 15 i2 11 i► P ca �r BOLSA CHIA S1 Ln INSo N 21 -•---- sac Gi11_ CA N -. --� .9 EDIMbER AVE b 3 17 3 6 -4 2 14 ( 9 14 HEIL AVE 47 13 4Z q 5'9 WARNEk AVE 4 9 t SLATER AVE 1 9s� 3 3 t 2 TALBERT AVE 3IS , $ oof 4 ! Ig ELLIS AVE 34 i- ,\?-Q ,fiwffLD 21 AVE 14 z 2 Z7 CLAY St 2 2 s8 i 1 $ L7, YORKTOWN AVE S ! 2 10 sI ADAMS .AVE 21• s 4 `� s MIOtANAPOIIS "TA AVE Z7 Z � O � � x crs ILA i 14 22 20 27 •.�� 32 3s sa . 42 ;' EDINbER AVE N N w •A v S O v i 8 q-. i 7 HEIL AVE U 6N 3 3g 42 110 4 4g 37 WARNER AVE fm Ao 3.7 SLATER LIVE N TALBEKT AVE S� 7 b v � NR w �o rl is i2 ELtIS ME 9 �\ 9 3C n►3 liARFIELD AVE N Y7Z CLAY stNN�i V s Y'bRKTOWN AVE w ^' 3 7 io ADAMS AVE INDIMPOLIS .17 ARM AVE �C� 0 Qj w O cm Mg Q 's CA Z E II46ER AVE 45 I R 34 2694 2 / o HEIL AVE 44 17 29 zs 47 19 61 z WARNER. AVE o 9��•�, 3 . 3 I Z 4 Z 4 I s i SLATER AVE . �09 Z s�. 3 ! TALBERT .AYE 49 2 1 ELLIS AVE l2 3 2 0 s 7 �l0 AVE z 3 CLAY St Z f z 3 r4 1 YORKTOWN AVE 7 3 r ADAMS AVE q . � 33 �s i �i lIAPOLIS N - ATLANTA AVE.. Z3 2 - C 0 2D CA 18 20 � z4 -�-+ 2G P 34 35 32 P 33 1 E®IMER AVE 38 29 26 58 1 7z 7 8 11 ,5 ► 19 , 8 14 HEIL AVE 15 34 19 7 95 52 9 3 33 3� 37 -41 Q7 45 -43 WARNER AVE ,o 4 27 17 94 95 47 IS 7 38, 35 13 13 5 p7 t-r SLATER AVE 22 41 Id 5 � TALBERT AVE S3 19 � 14 19 �Z „ 40 I s I& 17 ELLIS AVE -o s s18 3 7 2 29 27 Q9 5 ea WFIELD AVE 37 y,� s CLAY ST. 2 Q o 6 0 3 2� at,-) 1 ,� . ,� YORKTOWNAVf to 2 _ � 3 23 � •,�41 �� ri ADAMS AVE Z.l 5 9 3 7 INDWIAPDLIS v c�° �� �,��• ���` ,9 ,8 ATLANTA AVE zz r POR. N.112, NE. 114, SE.114, SEC23; T.5 S., R. / W. 14 2- 17 i 1 10 O ¢ 71 . V h AVENUE 1.2z.�d Q •4 A 272.62 S',s.3' E. V4 COR. _ SEC. 23-5-// 90 m 23 34 �y' ! o P (� o / 24 33 _ 1-+ 0 3,9 19 4� 0 � j5.4! a �o 36 i3z' s. 9' <e•Sr. V �..� 37 25 4 6' �s.�� — a y _ 3 Lp` �9 26 i 2 `4 b0 m O 'a LjugJEGTTT 15 97.s�� z 30 1 2 9 Zo Loa, 0 0 v 2 i iF� Z 0 / =/00, -o 14 w �> 0 4. 75 AC. M. 6- ��. I3 7 79 16 ,; o 17 airs 6z, dim 11,,�e :r1rec371 45- Z Ze 7SG-z i,;�F.D c, ��iz-37z q-z4 -77 &-4-477 7":'e- 1, .%� >��.:�n D,- ��>sod `1-J-`1 `�� 117 44 ptv l li��.Lvi•�, CZ�� L� r c City of Huntington Beach! P.O.. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK November 16, 1977 Gary L. Schultz 13342 Cedar Street .Westminster, California Dear Mr. Schultz: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting held Monday, November 14, 1977:denied your re- quest that the City relinquish vehicular access rights to your property. If you have any questions regarding this action, please contact our office. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt CC: Ed Selich, Planning Director i A City of Huntington Beach C C.190 P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 I 5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1� O February 15, 1977 I Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Garfield Avenue, CC-190 AHFP #606 Reallocation Resolution Dear Council Members: Transmitted herewith is a reallocation resolution for the completed Garfield Avenue improvement project within the Arterial Highway Financing Program. The original Resolution No. 3265 -passed on December 21, 1970, reqested $130,000. 00 (one-half the cost of the project) from the Board of Supervisors. The actual cost of construction exceeded this amount by $40,656. 61 which was due to the relocation/removal of oil lines, railroad crossing modifications, traffic signal revisions, and changes in bid item quantities-, therefore, a reallo- cation resolution is required._ It is, therefore, recommended that your Honorable Body approve' this resolution and instruct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. Very truly yours, E. Hart e Director of Public Works HEH:DBB•ae Trans. d 1A Te CITY OF HUN TINGTTON REACH 0 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To Public Works Director and From John O'Connor Planning Department ,Director Deputy City Attorney Subject Extension of Magnolia Boulevard Date June 21, 1974 to Pacific Coast Highway Litigation on the value of the property condemned by the city for the extension of Magnolia Boulevard to Pacific Coast Highway. appears imminent in the very near future. In order to obtain an appraisal of the v..alue� -of this property,. it is essential to ascertain whether or not a precise plan of street alignment had been adopted by the city prior to initiation of condemnation procedures. If. such plan has not been adopted, it could involve substantially greater acquisition costs to the city. The City Clerk has reviewed her Ifiles. and is unable to locate any such specific plan. Please advise 'whether ,or not such plan was. .proc'essed, through the Public Works Department or the Planning Department and Planning Commission. JOHN O'CONNOR Deputy City Attorney JO:k cc : City Clerk ` V M� "� 3� July 26, 1973 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution Relocating the Opening to the Frontage Road Adjacent to Adams Avenue to Align with the Center Line of Shorewood Circle At the request of the City Administrator, we transmit herewith a resolution to relocate the opening to the frontage road adjacent to Adams Avenue in order to facilitate traffic. flow and to provide for future con- struction of median islands along Adams Avenue between Magnolia Street and Shorewood Circle . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB: lm Attachment HITE-CITY ATTORNEY *4, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. }� BLUE-CITY CLERK .GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR V CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department 7-18-73 Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or Resolution is hereby requested: Please prepare a resolution in accordance with the attached draft regarding the frontage road opening relocation of Adams Avenue. 3 Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds 8-6-73 Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: Cit Administrator Y DRAFT July 12, 1973 WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to facilitate traffic flow and to provide for future construction of median islands along Adams Avenue between Magnolia Street and Shorewood Circle; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does resolve as follows: SECTION I. That the existing opening to the frontage road adjacent to Adams Avenue and approximately 135' west of the centerline extension of Shorewood Circle to be relocated easterly to align with the centerline of said Shorewood Circle. SECTION II. The relocation of the opening to the frontage road shall accommodate existing utility facilities and existing landscaping. AQ01C•GLS410.GQWY 1 i42.go 31.4 L,�• 1 ij I Ol c -���— -- — -- t t ++mac- _-_-•--==s=-.:_- -1--- N �. ,;.may i, ,• ' .l V lJ �\— � � \ .,\_-'-��—j` __ --_._-__ �_-- •\—_ �, � �•_*•`' -.`_ S �..__ \\ ` �I �� gi T f t '.� { _ �� �. � � � � `` � .� � \\ �\ �. .` Gam.-•tp.. . `'1,' 3•E'Ft.'zi. 0 � 'i � h 7 . �� i �; r � OBI c.=a" .;t;r;+'�' .: -za' "�' `r ` eF •�-' 1. � a �w.� .. -'� � ,� ._i`�A.. W .�i+� �. �. �.q �. . �TV OF HUNTINGTONgv, BEACH CA 7 - ? COUNCIL-ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH a i To Mayor and City Council From City Administrator Members Subject OPENING THROUGH MEDIAN ON Date July 6 , 1972 BROOKHURST STREET i i There have been several requests by businessmen to locate an opening in the median along Brookhurst Street south of Hamilton Avenue to facilitate south bound traffic making a left turn into their business establishments . The City' s Traffic Engineer investigated the area and made the following recommendations : 1 . Providing an opening in the median at the expense of traffic safety is not realistic . Permitting this request would set a precedent at other commercial locations . 2 . Permit a U-turn at Brookhurst and Hamilton, but monitor the intersection for accident cause . Respectfully , i David D. Rowlands City Administrator i DDR:bwo i i I I t=. rr� kF - 18582 BEACH BLVD., HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (714) 962-4494 August 10, 1971 LU) r �- -� ✓ Cl �� C�bUCUJIyrytC r7q�1 II "+ca,C4. Paul Jones City Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: Closing of Median opening on Beach Boulevard located in front of Town & Country Center. Dear Sir: Please be advised that I am one of the owners of Town & Country Center located at 18582 Beach Boulevard, Huntington Beach , California. It has recently been brought to my attention that the median strip located on Beach Blvd. in front of the center is going to be closed as a result of the widening of Beach Blvd. In that I believe that the closing of the median would cause the tenants in the center to suffer financial hardship, I respectfully request that the City Council reconsider its position in reference to this matter and permit me or other authorized representatives of the center to address the Council at its regular meeting on August 16, 1971 and that this matter be placed on the agenda under written communications. Very truly yours, Herbert Marshak, M. D. HM/ee 1.6G10 tTi` '-tier ?u1;e9�-aY#'d Whittie' , (:c_L:*I,-iCYP.! 9l i The Hon. Mayor. and Members of the City Council P.O. Box. 190 Huntington Beach, California . " Gentlemen: We are presently in the process of erecting a full service; high volume car wash on Beach Boulevard at the North West corner of Aldrich in the: city of Huntington Beach. We own six lots and have a thirty year lease on three more on which the facility is being constructed. We are very concerned about the closure of the previously existing left turn opening in Beach Boulevard at the Aldrich intersection as this will greatly impede the operation of our business and will have a deleterious effect on the flow of Traffic on Edinger. On behalf of ourselves and several other property owners and businesses affected, we respectfully request that we may present to the city council at the earliest available opportunity our petition to reopen this divider with a left turn pocket for northbound traffic at the intersection of Beach and Aldrich,. I At that time, we will present evidence to prove that this will not only play a crucial role in the success of our individual businesses, but should inure to the benefit of the community as a whole. Very truly yours,, Sheldon D. Grossman sdgjerl 4 +y v^ 1071 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT J� � CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MEMORANDUM I To C� '� -- -- � Date V � d From CITY ENGINEER Subject go d Signed 28 July 1971 City Council City of Huntington Beach California Re: Median Break - Beach Blvd. & Aldrich Honorable Mayor and Council: We the undersigned feel the median divider " Break" at Aldrich on Beach Blvd. should be restored with a stacking area for north bound t; traffic left turn pocket, for the following reasons: ' 1. The properties along Aldrich Street West of Beach BILvd. are all Zoned Commercial. The present and future commercial traffice generated on this street will make this median break vital to the smooth flow of traffic in this area. 2. Several of the Businesses now located along Edinger presently use Aldrich Street for ingress and egress. The median break at Ald- rich allows customers to enter and exit from these existing businesses without going through the slow moving traffic and tie- up that exists at the corner of Beach and Edinger. NAME ADDRESS United California Bank 7902 Ediner Ave, , Htg . Bch. Edi r.. 742 ffice i Ii i jA ey YfMalger i- � �p /�J � ���✓.Gl/n�,//jam(_".� 7 751 1 w / J 2 J11 ne :30, 1.971 ponorable t iayor and t%it-r Councilillen hf 1`,°n�tinEpton Beach, C rl.ifornia i Subject: Blocking; of left turn out o:r Li.berty Street and teach Blvd. (.gee attached map) ,Je T.,he area property a;a iers and businessmen respectively request ti<e siJb ject turnout not be blocked as presently planned. 1. 7e agree thnt by rechici.ng titrnouts there can be a reduct- ion o" acnidents and increased flow of vehicles; however, in this case it is b;:l ieved that these objectives can not. be net fnr the.fol.loid_ng reason. Liberty Street provides tY:e main inr;ress and egress fox, the large incb)strial area at t,hc iiest �?n.,d of L _brit,- ``'t.reet and Jacqulyn Lane and tiaYt i.t.;h is contimjing to heconi- rrore i.ndiistrially developed. 1hr�rie business's consist D"' many companies that use large serni.-tra.-ll ers au ch as `iunt�rr T7tnn ?bench Van and Storage, i ission 'ign Co., Standard _`nrl,gstr:i.al Laundr,r and many others. The primary problem broul:ht about by the sub;juct change is that t'rese larf;e vehicles rr,st now make a "t?" turn at 4:1,)wriian to travel norti-. on ;'ieo,ch Blvd. , or make. a, 111)" turn at 5'oeer Avenue to travel �r>uth to Liberty St. The sign- ificance of this ro:i.nt has been flirth er demonstrated by' several consecutive injury accidents -involving industrial vehicles, sine; the; temporary blockage started two weeks ar7c 2. The block between libert :3t. and r-iewma.n St. on the west side o" 'leach Blvd. has peen zoned for cotmrer.cial use for 46 y�:ars and contains five h:ighj traffic business 's frhich rdep,endl, -linon the accessihility from Beach Blvd* for their customners. Th- blocking, at the 1..iberty Street turnout inhibits this traffic and presents an additional safety hazard which i:3 i_ncorzsistant with the original .zoning intent. Your as istance and conside,.rati on in this matter wi ll. he greatly appreciated by the ,:ndersigned who re.present,.s the concerned petit- ioners, Resnectfully yo}trs, i Wendell T. Pierson Liberty Park Liquors 17685 ;each Blvd., lwnti_ngton Beach, Calif. � L�,',,(��-�72g ..ZL ��o-LAC �J�/e l �'' � �i '�•�_ V���I.�-?-�- a-���rut, 11775, 13 ✓ ` //f/•�/Jf !r `ter" """'�(/j�/ / -7� / 1 / • O � . All A , AITV 76.9� . rn•�j: ff ,� C'y �� � yam_ ,: �• ,,c� /1 �.�f ... _ 4" '4r .+!�.-� l\. �� .�� ��•. :I� rafa�ti.�A +�N R'y.�+ ! �f�A ra_�Saa9 t �, �f`'jj� t it j f� z +illy�' •�%�it` -•. ' = 1 ,��, ,� �_ '`• -r - _ -. F u' �� '�' • �: _ . L f .- :k. ,ate -, i y r i REDUCED lived mai B-/e• e•/e- _` c� 0•36- 0•�{f' USE SCALE 3 INCHES ON ONI �b divin !'�'I I Eiaa• � ' L•3/7' _J L.476 L DETA/L ,CP� �R/R�Rsirxnr e 44 bherfr ! Speer Ave TAX �R/RJ�7e�.r •ftl.M✓ .V/ R/R '� � y t 6 JS' '1/NIZ m bhro/ \ C.'.aab Al dro 1O%J wo/Ml cw ,r q Slrsilif f/Hair liven E.R fvR/W �e , �°� � � i P �� .YEI J'•ZIfOElf 11311\� h . 4S'E/6w I .sa v rtV(y ESen6v st. to s ier Ave.AYe. u io /eL rz'es/y/r).�rds 'lll�v 6radr fi der i�Af fY �tl df s'It0•e1/re++f 6�r/aff / id� bwb �6 dv n 101f ,, W�B i 1/t Ts(xC�tr./a ✓J/ f EA/PT/I :_• I'/ �b I � !?'E/L�ew' \�Of=1LSi0,EL.P%ZZ60/ � ` ��(!6• O1J AC '��-!Qd•OJ b�(iv+s/ /ey11 CSP.✓Tbrrdend axe( d9%rJ'AW..AA—A` I \ h / E!�'•Z/R7. fl i'-•ZI./Z .si.e.,�w,.,i o,,..ei yam•» PI 1 / Nw 1/if R5 Rat�ova ,fiinvK/I:•T7'l.N/--. / AIN-JM 10B•I/(atr/ofeiv/a(l+�r:J 36t,9'..f0.4ft _� 1V/! i\ / i i 1V 9=4/Sb Pbe AV-ZJ P � _� E d-irP EP t / �— Gab/ear 1�M16RJ0G! Re.a r---� � �rinuo 1-.Efi CMP OS-em6!/- q� E.O Remote EX%at- � •R/O,�ii{/ � � �" 4q p �b 90'Ti r B-Z barb B2 Curb l Cu L-+Pemove EXilt. Gurd b7,'A Z 5 Ti _ I B I Curb KI 'R Ga/b O./7 I G. Sirfaain 1 Coaa 6fwr 1 r E.P I r L 90'Toper wd' QNf.MYi Is Q!'. ` Rion J/.vL// I �L-R�mnve Lrivl cork : �R r0 JIfbT 4naf 1 l'!k Ca bar dC�A'' P//�JBZ9Rr/lLbarf j in��an 9rCl/bT ! 9�C it)1 Jpvi L7!A Vroi ht roDe from E.P. to R/W R/�/ _ 4 M• Sn' .�.•?Z.� s�q y Sto.2 5�96}a f1o. 2//t34 w2/R LR%oR(tl/jRemn.+r 49.AW?,�,7f W p; +/:+/ayrr/errs �] / RZ10 J•SZT q; 1•!I-/eG'nfw '•�' /neie// F/OR/[f � qi A6 ai6 gwy A. yi d•Z'69'Z9- City of Huntington Beach U'+�7 P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT July 26, 1971 041 3 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Subject: Beach Boulevard Median Openings Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are three resolutions regarding the Beach Boulevard median. Two of them are pursuant to City Council minute action of July 19 directing that Holt Avenue and Liberty Street be reopened. The third is to commence the paperwork for an opening to serve Huntington Lanes and Lumberland. This opening will be paid for by the property owners being served. Very truly yours, ames R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:ae Trans. S Y . CAJ70-k /NC SUITE 4 22410 HAWTHORNE BLVD. TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90505 (213) 373-6351 June 25 , 1971 'CC. Do yle Manager Beach LL By City Hall, Civic Center Huntington Beach, California 19P/ Re : Left-turn lane closure on Beach Boulevard at Holt CITY C Dear Mr.Mr. Miller : Our Company has a fast food service restaurant on the northwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Holt Street in Huntington Beach. Certain of the left-turn lanes on Beach Boulevard are being closed pursuant to work being done by the State Department of Highways in cooperation with the City of Huntington Beach, and one of those being .closed is the left-turn lane at Holt which was formerly used by Gino' s northbound customers for access to our restaurant off of Holt. This closure has the effect of isolating Gino ' s from the northbound traffic on Beach Boulevard and is causing alarming damage to our business. It is Gino' s feeling that any deleterious effect on traffic flow from the reopening of the left- turn lane at Holt would be extremely minor in comparison with the economic loss to be suffered by Gino ' s restaurant if the lane remains closed. We .have met with Mr. William Hartge and Mr. Ralph Lava, and we believe they understand why the situation is of such concern to Gino ' s. We now would like the opportunity to present our position to the City Council for its review. We are , therefore , requesting permission to address the City Council at its next meeting on July 6 , 1971, in order to explain our problem to the Council ;in more detail and to ask for relief. t Mr. Doyle Miller -2- June 25 , 1971 City Manager Please let me. know if anything further must be done by us in order to have this matter placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting on July 6 , 1971 Very truly yours , Gino ' s , Inc. BY Robert F. McM&hon s � � June 30, �971 Y.. '_J Honorable Mayor and City Councilmen t of Huntington Beach, California ,; -Subject: Blocking of left turn out of Liberty Street - and Beach Blvd.. (See attached map) We the area property owners and businessmen respectively request_ that the subject turnout not be blocked as presently planned. 1. We agree that by rechicing turnouts there can be a reduct- ion of accidents and increased flow of vehicles; however, in this case it is believed that these objectives can not be met for the following reason. Liberty Street provides the main ingress and egress for the large industrial area at the west end of. Liberty Street and Jacqulyn Lane and which is. continuing to become more industrially developed. These business's consist of many companies that use large semi-trailers - su.ch as Huntington Beach Van and Storage, Plission Sign Co., Standard Industrial Laundry and many others. The primary problem brought about by the subject change is that these large vehicles must now make a "U" turn at Newman to travel north on Beach Blvd. or make a "U" turn .at Speer Avenue to travel south to Lib erty St. The sign- ificance of this point has been further demonstrated by several consecutive injury accidents involving industrial vehicles, since the temporary blockage started two weeks ago. 2. . The block between Liberty St. and Newman St. on the west side of'Beach Blvd. has been zoned for commercial use for 46 .years and contains five high traffic business's which depend upon the accessibility from Beach Blvd. for their customers. The blocking at the Liberty Street turnout inhibits this traffic and presents an additional safety hazard which is inconsistant with the original zoning intent. Your assistance and consideration in this matter will be greatly appreciated by the-undersigned who represents the concerned petit- ioners. Respectfully yours., Wendell T. Pierson Liberty Park Liquors 17685 Beach Blvd.., Huntington Beach, Calif. c, . DIST I GOON*v I POU7E T FOST MILES t A"OJ• • OTAL ROJECT � e•lB- a•/e REDUCED PLAN ' ' 07 ORA 5-9 /G d.7 A Af i7 •� c•sas" c•s�J -_ USE SCALE BELOW _ ( i 3 ' ^ a21, A///„((/ E•3, $•S.B I 2 _ 3 �E51lN•IMElR CEOIlTOKD IL GIR - /BiZI2.SP-�_ f•L, L•9J7' a-dale G•//7" 3 ING�E5 ON ORIGINAL PLAN - •tom �Sr drvin �'•1 •E/bav ' L•317' �� �I �fj _ Q J ATE APPROVED LAT4Ff,4L DZ 411- � y !'so CA Beet LRfRJRemNoe m @ L/berfy Speer Ale. rh-A Q0 �Q 9eo%: [".40' 4 t' !/�4k �0" ti 1d// LR/RJ Remo e I .� l a 0.6 rL :_r:.-�- ", , F?JrN R/R s L�R, l• .SO' eJ•tT/9 �>3 R/R�/nsfa// u �' n IV a B"rB"r7"WxdPasi+ Q67 06BL! �,� ro/eur6 I';T ,r� q StraigbtgroCo fiomEP. foR/W e � -'•�� "21/+41 seebJfrn/ Craa/e fo o/roi�1Dii ._;__�V CB6Li�Bill I E4yiiJ flame 3!/1TC °q ay ./E[y zz../OEMY%21.•4 Z•1W/e6tv�bcr • Liberfy 5t. to 5pser Ave. 3 y 30. 45*,FAA a N•3Jd(•„%t7.3tN• ✓aii7Pioesi�' /y 6raobJbdvin,dO�Y 410� Blreab>�a/a4( /B.r11'CS.v�/9vrdendsref, - w/G/srrdb-C.�r++rJllxev I SerMDra xgsse/s/ 45�M.v `� I lw�t �b drain,701i. \ - 4•/J/v b „z a' r ml/&A iv/rn A ZSgo�. •,(p d'ZOd+oi ,bra/ 4S'E/dnr ELs%II..S9,E[iP%11.60 JJ' "Z//7S aer/vfeml�ibY EAiPTH D/TCH 9lA P//f94 to 2/SrtO./O t II-/B6rafea OYf GG /BrIZCSpw�l/oird�adlov (9 rB'APCTyDrA h E! s'•1/St7 f1 P"•YL/Z 6/.A cho.4swm6/ I / 14"r/d1�0"CSP/ sJb%E/Y:I</BE[f%Y/oC+l Ily y .liB6:4PC,Tpr A .NH-JAl ZOB•of✓ ter/ateiv/ai/ - I/r/5'CrP! Renrnaus RsmveC/si77G•HP 36r�fldAf rxi0 , C"NK + $ Ge F/v� /36 r72 APL.Tjpa A,59"Lf. uz CMp4f _v:r %�',�ivwA E!J-'Z3.M riR6 lr=9=4•(fsf/-Xv Aff�2) � bO.ifif 'r�///v / /Rernw+s 14x606lIP J• --•y,RekA", a C&A/-ontfia�41se nb/ 1 f Ef' C"Y!p J EP s:4(1 ` J --' Gob/e Oar ,Zoa.aJBGR,�7f ,y ,saQr y - 6 o +32?✓EC r---I Pti�xr•r Z-,(9i GHP\ ,feinvve/T Tlµ F"Gwdv .!/oi,Fev7 ZQ7' . •k •� v 55'Lt.,.5zJ6 Remave Exist R/OR(/J� ;� � QSSembly' Q EP. $a V �v,,r C EXis t Gurb �1 Ni y /��/ o �O 90'Tv er B Z Gurb tl v �¢Il �o i l h ' i B2 Curb a � (I t7 0�Oh i/�I D• 5d 7oar I^`, r-EXis/GUrd b R•Z.5' Yore/G /knfer ld P x/st Gurb I NOO'40't !V I.S' P 25' /O.OGn77;4, ore istGu/b i �C?F/a7r ` `— ��fbr q _ � A3 aL 3 i emove Exist. Gurd 90 T k R/OR/rf B t Cur r B_7�� h R/OF/�l�Rewva t•3 r3 Remave Exist.Gurb h II e I p i� Remove Exist Gurb O./7 I G. SoTfoaiq� ''� L-- Lea BoK �y -O./ 5arfacll y h 4I Amara! . 90'To e/ RiOQ/r1J au/a// b M.Awe. 4B W.. Remove Eris/Carb 'o E.P. w w I --6 1r 6 �— 6. �• 1 C �� G 6 _7 PO4+7QAfA7T(Covs/ �� +07.d4fbT lisiet j"At,A Aar ";w .Z9,oftVaast Y/f/� /Z"9aCa.. eas, fe;w J 9+60 fbT Adtvmon 9+e4fbT !6a 9rB fbl JperPi i L'BL 6�?iP fnvl.CeP L-StTai96t yrase from EP. to R/W 49 RiOf/il t� N,ZA7'd s•72tb sdv � u -- Straight yraGe from E.P. to R/W �_-_ V 9°� y St_a. 2/4t00 to Sta. 2/6oS3 1I LR/RI Rvrpw StO.205t95ta 5/1 2//f'3B wZ/R LR/OR([f/jRemare -6[Yl?/0+71 WQ' of "/'�'te9^afCYr6 o R/R /nr/a// /nsfa// RiOR([{ / NZ50" ✓•117 q Zt✓ eCmtas �G'0� Q- , I W2/R w/Glteyqu,S{w•a(�orosvr�gi Ab eu�6 9onp rr �fg { • NYSr /k� -� n. /ns� Z-2q%B Bivif:a eii d•Z'S9'Z9" +�A � • I L•AM..149 �' 1 �r i -00 1.2 _ _ 7D Taj /Q��j Iva d, �' 76 99 L101 IN 1766 r3E&C.Ii 6b HUNTING3t` N. B&kCH 329.11-1127-0250_ CDED A *OW.00 ThAWK ;U " V � 17YL-/( ' Olt l pew o w,K,n I ?of � .3. ~ _ 1 14, -7(,,7 6oa OU�, Of �° 7 /3161 �i-ee-maw• GGi�:aa,.� Ct�>;.. 779 y7S'2 Sp�� r Sf. y}1ee�aVt � C �� / 7 mod/ /�cz�•�� K°� 73 G Z (i7dE -1,7 s LN g"+2 (fI,�CCF��N/ �"�^'� �/�72 cliR � ��J' f`i^Ah L7 Pi✓NK. J 74/9 rill 7G saw 1,;444� • • DOYLE MILLER City of Huntington Beach Administrative Officer BRANDER D.CASTLE P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Assistant \ Administrator DON P. BONFA City Attorney WARREN G. HALL MAYOR V Treasurer George C. McCracken PAUL C.JONES COUNCILMEN ( City Clerk Jerry A. Matney Ted W. Bartlett Alvin M. Coen Norma Brandel Gibbs MEMORANDUM Jack Green Donald D.Shipley TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: PAUL C. JOKES. City Clerk DATE: FRIDAY, J<ULY t.42, 1971 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL,,MATTERS REQUESTED FOR CON- SIDERATION AT MEETING .OF 7/6/71:_ 3 �a� Ordinance No 1659 for Introductionb Pet it ion.Against the Closing of the 17� //_ �� Beach Boulevard W _ Median' at Liberty St . C Enclosed herewith is "a copy `o-f Ordinance 1659 which I respect- fully request that, you accept---fo_r __first reading at Tuesday night's meeting. At the .,,time the agenda acid packets were mailed to you this had not been received from the Legal Depart- ment . There is a certain-,am-cun't of urgency for the introduc- tion of this ordinance,, because it. is . related to an annexation which I am trying to expedite.`_of: a. portion of the Bolsa Chica property. The pre-zoning, covered in this ordinance, was approved by Council at the meeting of June 21, 1971 . By permitting its introduction, it will allow an additional two weeks in the processing of the annexation. Lcken has requested that I submit to you the petition the closure of the Beach Boulevard median at Liberty it can be considered at the same time as another test which is on your agenda as Item N-1. 4L"V� tu q f t t / JAMES R.WHEELER EARLE ROBITAILLE OLLIN C.CLEVELAND KENNETH A. REYNOLDS Director of Public Works Police Chief Building Director Planning Director V INCENT G.MOORHOUSE FRANK B.ARGUELLO RAYMOND PICARD Director Harbors, WALTER W.JOHNSON NORMAN L.WORTHY Finance Director Fire Chief Beaches& Development Library Director Recreation &Parks Director � I 27 April 1971 TO : City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Acquisition of Certain Real Property for the Extension of Magnolia Street from Banning Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and Authorization of Condemnation of said Property The attached resolution was prepared at the direction of the City Engineer. This resolution repeals Resolution No . 3184 in order to change the legal description of the property sought to be acquired by negotiation or condemnation. Respectfully submitted, DON P . BONFA City Attorney DPB :WM:lm Attachment i V 10 June 1970 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT : Extension of Magnolia Street (Daisy Thorpe Hook) The attached proposed resolution is required to correct a minor property description error in Resolution No. 3166 . The proposed resolution will repeal and replace said Resolution No. 3166 . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB:bc Attachment 9 E -�� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT April 13, 1970 Honorable Mayor JI+ l and City Council City of Huntington Beach , •. r7U Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Gentlemen: Transmitted, herewith, are petitions for the closing of pedestrian walkways in the city block wall on Springdale Street at Welde Circle and Milton Circle. In recent months the above walkways have become gathering places for young people after school hours. The increased frequency of non- students and the disregard for both public and private property adjacent to the walkways is a cause for concern. Supervision, both by the police and by the school administration has proved unsuccessful. It is therefore recommended that your Honorable Body accept the petitions and order the openings in the block wall sealed forthwith. Very truly yours, ames R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:JEF:nt Trans. .0001 � Jr � w PETITION 1 We, the undersigned, being owners of property on hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection and Springdale Street. i I i "k4 I t i I _ h/o — C9002 at Gr o� bL) 4 ak- - - C) 6k— (�v I v � j PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on u/ tLD C:-iR , ihereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the { pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection f of u/ LLD c12 { and Springdale Street. • 1 qfjI v/ f d 1I + iJ PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on LC) EE G� 12 hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection I of EL C— Cil� . and Springdale Street. i I. 1 C,7Z- C z xela �� v .i: PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection of . and Springdale Street. I� '32- c - c � Gv i r — rr^^ a•, PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property 'on hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection i of L%�N 1 D 0 Z °� and Springdale Street. tov2Z N6 r / 3 ) � - a� 0 G� i 0 4—Z— IJ a C) a i. 4 ^ fi PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on L-D� 6.1 hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the I jpedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection l of 1 L IF ti� GlIZ r and Springdale Street. k+ t F PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on 1.�11 �To �.1 � i2 ihereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection of W) ik T(OQ G1a and Springdale Street. r PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on 1_ � �► G hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the I pedestrian opening in the block wall. at the intersection I of and Springdale Street. i 4 F, PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on (� hereby request the city of Huntington .Beach to .close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection of and 'Springdale Street. Lot L si r� I r(�c PETITION - yaf We, the undersigned, being owners of property on C1 , hereby request the city of Huntington Beach to close the pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection of P t�—T D t\—) and Springdale Street. Y `L. iov/v Y i ' y PETITION We, the undersigned, being owners of property on hereby request the .city of Huntington Beach to close the ! pedestrian opening in the block wall at the intersection of and Springdale Street. i i i I. a April 27 , 1970 T0: City Council I l9� - FROM: City Attorney t SUBJECT: Magnolia Street Extension The attached resolution authorizes the City Attorney to proceed with the necessary action to acquire by eminent domain or negotiation the real property described in such resolution for the extension of Magnolia Street from Banning Avenue to Paci=fic Coast Highway . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB:mw Attachment t: r i J� City of Huntington each o P.O. BOX 190 LIF ; J 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTME �` '<LrJ August 12, 1969 J P3. �O Honorable Mayor and City Council Y " City of Huntington Beach r Attention: Doyle -Miller City Administrator Subject: Resolution to Alter Various Median Openings Along Beach Blvd. Gentlemen: At the City Council meeting of July 21, 1969 I presented to your Honorable Body a plan of Beach-Boulevard which shows various closures or relocations of existing'median openings. At that time I pointed out that these alterations'•should be affected at the time Beach Boulevard is widened. The State requires City Council concurrence before closing any existing median opening. Therefore, we respectfully request that your Honorable Body approve the attached resolution and direct the City Clerk to return two fully executed copies of same to this office for delivery to the State. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:PEC:ae Attach. _ v �p�1TINGTpN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH o " Q ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Huntington Beach, California vi c�CpUNTY �►�` February 9 196 5 /o Q APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Honorable a2ayor �yY.M QC and City Council - c1TY ci8u City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Subject: Closure of Cul-de-Sac Walkway at Doriane & Edwards Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith is a petition signed by all the residents of Doriane Circle requesting the subject closure. If the Council approves the closure, construction will be done by the Department of Public Works and the eight residents will be charged equally for the cost. v truly yours' mes R. 4�heeler Director of PCublic Works wAm JR?h 19AM:am Trans. tract No. . Huntington. Beach Doriane Circle _ A Petition to close the opening in the trall facing - —_ Edwards street ... aid Doriane Circle. If agreed 2. rr r - C� 8. __ -- 3= �osr O�VNSINQTpN� - s CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT G,�`$ - • `� 1W 4Q Huntington Beach, California ' FCpp� September 16, 1964 lam' Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach ! �3 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a project statement on state forms proposing the use of gas tax funds for the construction of left turn lanes on Beach Boulevard at Taylor Avenue. These lanes are essential for the safe flow of the increasing volume of turning vehicles at this intersection. Also transmitted herewith is a resolution adopting and submitting this budget of gas tax funds ; and it is recommended that your Honorable Body adopt this resolution. The Director of Public Works will subsequently transmit the forms to the State of California Division of High- ways for their approval. Upon receipt of .their approval notification, the plans and specifications will be transmitted for approval to advertise. Very truly yours , James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works By <+ r F. E. Har e Deputy Director of Public Works 44 JRW:6WK:hm trans. April 8, 1963 Doyle Miller from Keate Worley Dear Mr. Miller: In response to the Ocean View Homeowners Association letter dated April 3, 1963, it is our opinion that the City can legally close off Terry Drive. It is the general rule that all streets and public ways of a city, however acquired, are subject to the power of vacation. Of course, the determination by a city that public necessity or convenience require the vacation is subject to judicial review, but in the absence of fraud or collusion, the decision of the City Council of what constitutes public interest or convenience in such a matter is legislative in character and its determination is conclusive. (People vs. City of Oakland, 96 Cal App, 488) b ' s�� OFFICIALS INGTO�, DOYLE MILLER ORATto�f9 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER VS C I T Y O F JW/V�V/ torn �CiV✓V'V� BRANDER D. CASTLE ._ -_ • ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR C2T s7'!t/CCcI• Q -_ --____-__ ______________________________- JAMES R. WHEELER ivy F -o Q P. O. BOX XxCK 269 C A L I F O R N I A ENGINEER C� �1809+P JAMES D. PLUNKETT CD�NTY CITY ATTORNEY V HOWARD ROBIDOUX. POLICE CHIEF COUNCILMEN - April 8, 1963 ROBERT M. LAMBERT, MAYOR DELBERT G. HIGGINS ERNEST H. GISLER FIRE CHIEF JAKE R. STEWART VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE THOMAS H. WELCH LIFEGUARD CHIEF LYNDON A. WELLS, SR. OLLIN C. CLEVELAND BUILDING DIRECTOR CITY CLERK WILLIS C. WARNER PAUL C. JONES PLANNING DIRECTOR TREASURER BETTY DIEKOFF Mr. Doyle Miller, City Administrator, City Hall, Huntington Beach,Calif. Dear Mr. Miller: In response to the Ocean View Home Owners Association's letter dated April 3, 19639 it is our opinion that the City can legally close off Terry Drive. It is the general rule that all streets and public ways of a City, however acquired, are sub- , ject to the power of vacation. Of course, the de- termination by a City, that public necessity or convenience require the vacation, is subject to judicial review, but in the absence of fraud or collusion, the decision of the City Council of what constitutes public interest or convenience in such a matter is legislative in character and Its determination is conclusive (People v. City of Oakland 96 Cal App 488) . Yours very truly, JAMES D. PLUNKETT, Cit Attorney By MKW:h M. KEATE WORLEY Ass' t. City Attorney vale' w 33audmw AS Old _._, TIN�STON BEACH HOME-06WNERS ASSOCIATION NO. 1 f i April 3, 1963 i f i Mr. Doyle Miller ! City Administrator City of Huntington Beach Mintington Beach, California l Dear Mr. Miller: em Ocean View Homeovners Association is interested in Zone Case #322 dealing with Dick Nerio and the 20 acres located on the south side of f Terry Drive. Mr. herald Gresham, the associations representative assigned to study this case, has recommended that ve obtain from the City of Hunt- ington Beach a legal ruling pertaining to the legality. of closing off Terry Drive. The attached enclosures are for your information. We would appreciate your counsel on this matter. With best regards, CArthur M. Suchesk 1 President 8692 Camel Circle Huntington Beach, Calif. AMS:sc ` Enc. 1. staff report, March 19, 1963 I 2. Gresham report, March 15, 1963 P.O. BOX 704, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1P.®.IfBC)m RIO 1Hiu7NWIINCAW(LD IISIEAUIDts September 19, 1960 Highway Easement Deed Goldenwest Street Mr. James Wheeler, City Engineer City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Wheeler: Reference is made to your letter of June 15, 1960 with attachments concerning certain improvements along Goldenwest Street, and requesting an easement from us for use of a portion of our property on "Farm Lot ?7" bordering this street. We are happy to comply with this request and are enclosing a highway easement deed dated September 8, 1960 conveying use of a 15' strip for these improvements. This property is currently under an oil and gas lease to Southwest Exploration Company, and a consent agreement should be obtained direct from them for the easement. We will appreciate having a signed copy of the consent agreement for our files and recording data on the easement when it becomes available. Yours very truly, AV:.4:7�i d. Sher. nny JSD:jm encl cc: Mr. G. J. O'Brien Mr. Doyle Miller i HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY P.O. BOX 110 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. September 19, 1960 Highway c eme nt Deed oldenwa,st Street Kr. James bheeler, Sty gn neer City of Runtingymeach Huntington h, California .dear .Ar. Wheelers Reference is made to your letter of June 15, 1960 with attachments concerning certain improvements along Goldenvest Street, and requesting an easement from us .for use of a portion of our property on "Farm Lot 7,7" bordering, this street. DWe are happy to comply with this request and are enclosing a highway easement deed dated September 8, 1960 conveying use of a 151 strip for these improvements. 1hi" property is currently under an oil and gas lease to Southwest Exploration Company, and a consent agreement should be obtained direct from them for the easement. 'We will appreciate having a signed, copy of the consent agreement for our files and recording data on the easement when it becomes available. Yours vex? truly, 3, YemrmanDDenny JSD:jm encl cc: Mr. G. J. 016rien `r. Doyle Miller f IN �1N QN c, y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH JAMES R.WHEELER City Engineer ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WILLIAM S. LEWIS o• Q Huntington Beach, California Street Superintendent CQu� Cps. September 1, 1960 Tir. Doyle Miller City Administrator City of Huntington Beach Subject: Golden West Street Extension through Reservoir Hill Dear Sir: Following referral of the subject project to my office by the City Council, a study of this extension of Golden West has been made and the findings is submitted herewith: As you will recall the realignment of Golden West was . . recommended to the City Council by the Huntington Beach Safety Council. At the same time the Huntington Beach Company indicated that they would trade rights of way at no cost to the city. While this right of way requirement has not been discussed with the Huntington Beach Company I would, if the project is approved by the City Council, suggest that vie request granting of the ultimate (100 foot) right of way at this time. This alignment of Golden West Street would be advantageous to the city in-the future. However the traffic volumes on Golden :lest at this time does not justify a project of the magnitude indicated by the Engineers estimate for the work. The total estimated cost for this 700 foot realignment project is about $25,000.00. The excessive cost of this project is caused by excavation in the amount of approxi- mately 5000cubic yards and reconstruction of gas lines belonging to San Diego Gas and Southern Counties Gas, and the plugging of 3 oil wells, total cost of these items is approximately $18,000.00. It is difficult for me to justify this expense in order to realine Golden West. This was brought to the City Council by the Huntington Beach Safety Council as a project, which would reduce hazard on Golden West. However, you will note by looking at the plan. of the project that yve are creating two T intersections, each of which has poor sight distance in one direction. Here then we would be creating two traffic hazards while eliminating one. Also we vould be contributing to an increased approach speed to the intersection of Mansion and 23rd thereby increasing the hazard of this poorly laid out intersection. The normal approach to reducing the traffic hazard is to attempt by some simple and economical means to alleviate the problem that exists. If I were initiating such a study at this location I would first very seriously consider making the circle drive around Reservoir Hill one way in a counter clock irise direction, and attempt to reduce the hazard by proper signing and striping. If and ihi en the concentration of accidents exists at a given location the first action is an investigation to see if proper warning and regulatory signs are posted to provide the motorist with ample advance warning of the condition that will confront him. It is my recommendation that because of the cost of the project the recommendation to the 11antington Beach Safety Committee be denied and that the project referred to the Police Department for study for posting of proper signs to eleviate any hazardous condition. Very truly yours, % /'James R. Wheeler City Engineer iam m EST1M&TE FOR GOLDEN WEEST EXTENSION Excavation - 5000 Cu. Yds. @ $1.50 37,500.00 Import Select - 675 x 26 x .75 = 488 Cu. Yds (-� $1.25 610.00 Type B Base - 675 x 26 x 96##/2000 = 842 Ton Q $3.00 2,526.00 3" P.M.S. - 675 x 214. x 36/2000 = 292 Ton @ $6.00 1,752.00 Tack Coat - 675 x 24 = 90 - 1440 Gas = 7 Ton @ 75.00 53.00 Compaction - 675 x 26 - 172550 Sq. Ft. ,05 876.00 Moving San Diego Gas 675 lin. ft. @ $11.00 7,425.00 Renew & relocate 6" Gas - 675 lin. ft. @ $4.25 2,869.00 Plug 3 oil wells @ S100.00 300.00 Sub total p23:911,00 T 5% Eng. `f' sc. 1,196.00 Total ?253107,00 1