HomeMy WebLinkAboutStreet Sweeping Program and Parking Citation Enforcement Pro —J
-Y OF HUNTINGTON BEAM.
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: J
Council/Agency Meeting Held: 614-0)
Deferred/Continued to:
'AAff rovQd E ConditionaI MApproved L Denied
�-k"it CI S signature
Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2001 Department ID Number:
I
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 049
PREPARED BY: CLAY MARTIN, ACTING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTO
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE SIDE-BY-SIDE STREET SWEEPING REPORT
Statement of issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
Receive and file the first annual (10 month) Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Report..
Funding Source:
Not applicable.
Recommended Action:
Motion to:
1. Receive and file the Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Report.
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s):
1. Do not approve the recommended action and provide staff with appropriate
direction.
RCA for Side-By-Side Street Sweeping Report(10 months)-2- 1/9/01 8:56 AM
I
RL._ 461EST FOR COUNCIL ACTI(.,_`
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
The report is being presented in two sections:
1. Data relating to the side-by-side street sweeping competitive services analysis
2. Data relating to twice-a-month street sweeping program performance (debris
collection)
Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Competitive Services Analysis
The details of the side-by-side street sweeping competitive services analysis are included
as Attachment One of this report. A summary of that information includes:
Cost Comparison
Contract Street Sweeping $205.849.99
City Street Sweeping $199,235.75
Difference (contract— city) $6,614.24
Percentage Difference 3.32%
Quality Comparison (Perfect Inspection Score is 2.0)
Contract Street Sweeper Inspection Average 1.80
City Street Sweeper Inspection Average 1.75
Public Inquiries Regarding Service Level
Contract Street Sweeper 41
City Street Sweeper 24
Attachment 1 also includes photographs and a brief description of the clean, moderate, and
dirty rating system the city and contractor use to evaluate street sweeper performance.
Twice-a-Month Street Sweeping Program Performance
The details of the twice-a-month street sweeping program's performance are included as
Attachment Two of this report. A summary of that information includes:
Debris Collection
Debris collected by street sweepers (city and 2,576.22 tons
contractor combined)
Reduction in the amount of debris collected -19.20%
from storms drains (per storm drain average)
with twice-a-month street sweeping
CONCLUSION
At this time, staff does not recommend any changes to the program. The side-by-side
street sweeping program was envisioned as a two-year evaluation of the city and contract
street sweeping operations and should run its course. Twice-a-month street sweeping has
proven effective at improving the appearance of the city's street and in removing debris
from the storm drain system.
RCA for Side-By-Side Street Sweeping Report(10 months)-4- 1/9101 8:56 AM
i
l
RL-MEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIC
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
Analysis:
i
BACKGROUND
In 1996, budget pressures forced the city to reduce its street sweeping program from twice-
a-month to once-a-month. That reduction in service raised a number of concerns, including
the presence of standing water and the overall condition and appearance of the city's
streets. Reducing the frequency of the street sweeping program also resulted in a
significant increase in the amount of debris and contaminants flowing into the city's storm
drain system, the Bolsa Chica, Huntington Habour, and the ocean.
In May of 1998, the City Council directed staff to prepare a plan and cost estimates for a
return to twice-a-month street sweeping. The City Council also directed staff to initiate a
,side-by-side comparison of the city's street sweeping operation with a private contractor.
The side-by-side comparison called for the city and the contractor to share street sweeping
duties with alternating street sweeping routes.
In October 1999, the City Council awarded a two-year contract to Nationwide
Environmental Services for street sweeping services. The contract with Nationwide
marked the beginning of the city's first competitive services comparison, which will analyze
the cost and service quality of the two providers over the two-year contract. The process
calls for periodic reports to be made to the Competitive Services Committee and annual
reports to the City Council.
PROGRAM BEGINS
Twice-a-month street sweeping began in November 1999. The competitive services
comparison was launched in January 2000 (after an adjustment period to allow the
contractor to learn the street sweeping routes), when staff began to track cost and
performance data related to the side-by-side street sweeping program.
Program Details
■ All arterial, industrial, and residential streets are swept twice a month.
■ Alternative side sweeping routes were established in high-density areas, including:
downtown, old town, and areas near Warner and Bolsa Chica and Beach and
Edinger.
■ Sweeping schedules were adjusted to accommodate children being dropped off and
picked-up at school.
ANNUAL REPORT
The first annual report is actually a 10-month report — from January 2000 through October
2000. The first two months of the side-by-side program were excluded from the analysis to
provide the contractor the opportunity to become familiar with the street sweeping routes.
Staff does not expect that the report would differ were it to be presented with a full 12
months of data.
RCA for Side-By-Side Street Sweeping Report(10 months)-3- 1/9/01 8:56 AM
F
RL,�.UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIC�
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
i
' Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number No. Description
1. Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Competitive Services Analysis
2. Twice-a-Month Street Sweeping Program Performance
RCA for Side-By-Side Street Sweeping Report(10 months)-5- 1/9/01 8:56 AM
Attachment 1
Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Competitive Services Analysis
Cost Comparison January - October 2000
Contract Street Sweeping City Street Sweeping
Operating Costs Operating Costs
Contract payments $183,108.90 Labor*A $122,755.72
Other/special payments $10,884.59 Equipment usage (lease pymt) $23,377.59
Fuel $7,281.11
Maintenance/repair $31,268.97
Total Operating Costs $193,993.49 Total Operating Costs $184,683.39
Contract Administration Costs* $11,856.50 Supervision Costs* $14,552.36
(cost to the city to administer the contract)
TOTAL •RT** $205,849.99 TOTAL THIS REPORT"
Difference(contract-city) $6,614.24
Percent Difference 3.32%
Average Monthly Cost $20,585.00 Average Monthly Cost $19,923.58
Difference (contract-city) $661.42
ReportsPrior
CONTRACT FIRST TRIMESTER $81,030.06 CITY FIRST TRIMESTER $74,478.38
Difference (contract-city) $6,551.68
* Labor costs and Contract Administration Costs include actual salary expenditures and a 32% benefit
factor.
^ City operating costs for labor include additional costs of$23,312.72 to provide a replacement street
sweeper driver for a driver who was injured on duty. These costs have been included because on-the-job
injuries, and the cost to replace injured personnel, are real costs to the city, and properly incorporated in
any competitive services analysis. Without this replacement cost, total cost for city street sweeping
operations would have been $175,923.03 or$29,926.96 (14.54 percent) less than the contractor.
**The cost of debris disposal is assumed equal regardless of service provider and is excluded from this
comparison. These costs would only become relevant should the city elect to alter the frequency of street
sweeping or parking restrictions.
6 1/9/01
I
Side-by-Side Street Sweeping Competitive Services Analysis
Quality Comparison January - October 2000
PUBLIC INQUIRES
Contract Street Sweeping (Inquiries relating to level of service") City Street Sweeping
41 24
19 Cleanliness 15
8 Missed Street/Area 3
6 Sweeper Speed 3
2 Customer Service 1
3 Property Damage/Safety 1
3 Wrong Day/Time 1
FIELD INSPECTION SUMMARY
Contract Street Sweeping (Perfect Inspection Score is 2.0) City Street Sweeping
Residential/industrial Streets
1.800 Local Streets 1.929
1.400 Cross Gutter 1.000
2.000 Circles 1.929
1.300 Standing Water 1.286
Arterial Streets
2.000 Major Streets 2.000
1.900 Cross Gutter 1.643
1.500 Knuckles 1.714
1.800 Large Debris 2.000
2.000 Mud and Gravel 2.000
Painted &Curbed Islands
2.000 Islands 2.000
2.000 Large Debris 2.000
2.000 Turn Pockets 1.600
2.000 Gravel 2.000
1.80 INSPECTION
10 inspections 14 inspections
*The majority of the public inquiries received by the Public Works department regarding street sweeping
are unrelated to the level of service the city or contractor delivers. These inquiries are primarily related
to parking citations, general questions about the program, and calls for service that exceed a street
sweeper's capability.
7 1/9/01
� , 1
•
1
c
F
4
}
7 R
r
r 1 •j «`?art..--w1} �.` -y I,y ;,.rj �� �" :• -'� "�'.,: J'. `
• j � � x Gam. A� t ,
ARTERIALS -
"CLEAN" ,
Free of
3
all debris t
"MODERATE"
Acceptable amount
of debris left from !
a Tymco Sweeper =
' sand, gravel and/or ;: +`
standing water : x
"DIRTY"
Unacceptable
heavy
debris present or
failed to sweep4-1
ISLANDS
"CLEAN"
Free of
all debris
F
ar
R �
"MODERATE" � �..
,d r
Acceptable amount
of debris (rock and/or ,
ravel) left from
f
a T mco Sweeper
�
"DIRTY"
Unacceptable
heavy
debris present or
failed to sweep island
r
Public Inquiries Regarding the Twice-A-Month Street Sweeping Program
January-October 2000
70 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Works Telephone Inquiries
Regarding Twice-a-Month Street
Sweeping
60 ------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trendline
50 ---- ---- ---------------------------------- - ------------ --------------------------------- -----------------------------
40 ---------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- --------
30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
20 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
City Council/City Administrator
Written Inquiries Regarding Twice-
a-Month Street Sweeping Trendline
10 ----------------
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct
8 1/5/01
j Attachment 2
Twice-a,-Month Street Sweeping Performance
Debris Collection Activity & History
Catch . .
St' ern Drain Basins Percent Lbs of Percent Debris
ChangeCleaning Cleaned; .
1999 (July- October)* 1,614 N/A 87,115 N/A 53.97 N/A
2000 (July- October) 1,651 2.24% 74,760 -16.53% 45.28 -19.20%
Contract City
Tons of Sweeping Street Street
Debris Collected Sweeping Sweeping Total
iJan-Oct2OOO Actual - Projected,
January 175.67 175.67 351.34
Febuary 142.10 142.10 284.20
March 168.65 168.65 337.30
April 118.34 118.34 236.68
May 112.47 112.47 224.94
June 116.31 116.31 232.62
July 95.14 95.14 190.28
August 113.17 113.17 226.34
September 111.71 111.71 223.42
October 134.55 134.55 269.10
TOTAL
*Storm Drains are cleaned once a year,just prior to the rainy season. Staff estimates that were Southern
California not experiencing a very dry year, the reduction in the amount of debris collected from the storm drain
catch basins would have been greater than 50 percent. With this year's lack of rain, less debris has been
washed into storm drain catch basins.
**The amount of debris collected by city street sweepers is not being tracked separately, but is believed to be
identical to the amount being collected by the contract sweepers. The city and contract sweepers sweep the
same routes throughout the city, simply alternating weeks. The amount of debris the city sweepers collect is
not tracked separately because the city sweepers dump the debris they collect at the city's maintenance yard
where it is collected, along with other non-street sweeping debris, by Rainbow Disposal. The city's
maintenance yard does not have a scale on which the sweepers could be weighed. The contract sweepers
dump the debris they collect at Rainbow Disposal's facility and are weighed by a scale at Rainbow's facility.
9 1/9/01
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Administration
SUBJECT: Street Sweeping Report
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
333»„3,
v.F m»
RCA ATTACHMENTS .
ly 3y W..........
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
33. ,». 3
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTA�CHMENTS� 3;;, ,3, -'riil33,>;,��;;;.
„n 3;3
133 13
a., ET„URN�E
REVIEWED, ,; R ;° '� '?FOR1iNARD ED
Administrative Staff /-S ( )
Assistant City Administrator (Initial)
City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( )
City Clerk ( )
1i3EXPLAN3ATIO" PbR`R'ETU'R3N''03F'"I'TEM: n
i
Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use
Eo�;�6rarsf".
ry OF HUNTINGTON BEAC C, MNAT)"I UMW
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER.
Council/Agency Meeting Held:
Deferred/Continued to:
ATroved Ll ConditioDf Ily Approved U Deniedf "t C17j's Signature
P4(44�
Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2001 Department ID Number: C=
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
)V-
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATORd?Aj
PREPARED BY: CLAY MARTIN, ACTING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTO-
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE STREET SWEEPING PARKING CITATION
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Statement_ of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
Receive and file report on street sweeping parking citation enforcement program from
January through Cctober 2000.
Funding Source:
Not applicable.
Recommended Action:
Motion to:
1. Receive and file the Street Sweeping Parking Citations Enforcement Program
Report.
Alternative Action(s):
The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s):
1. Do not approve the recommended actions and provide staff with appropriate
direction.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -2- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
R_ _)UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTT, J
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
Analysis:
BACKGROUND
At its August 7, 2000 meeting, the City Council approved an H-item, authored by Council
Member Garofalo, directing staff to:
1. Report on parking citations issued in the six months prior to twice per month street
sweeping (on a monthly basis), and citations issued each month since we have
instituted twice per month sweeping.
2. Report anticipated cost for second citywide sweeping and expected or annual
revenue from parking citations.
3. Coordinate this effort with the Managed Competition Committee.
This report deals specifically with parking citations relating to the city's return to a twice-a-
month street sweeping program.
PARKING RESTRICTIONS
When the city reinstituted twice-a-month street sweeping, it also created parking
restrictions designed to clear streets of cars for the street sweepers. Enforcing the parking
restrictions serves three purposes. First, street sweepers are most effective when they are
able to sweep along the curb and in the gutter of a street. When a sweeper must drive
around a vehicle parked in its path, it is forced to come off the curb and gutter for
approximately 30 feet and is essentially sweeping the middle of the street where there is
little or no debris. Second, enforcement is needed to cultivate voluntary compliance with
the parking restrictions for twice-a-month street sweeping. Third, revenue generated from
enforcing parking restrictions is expected to fund the expansion of the street sweeping
program for a number of years.
The no parking program involved posting "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs that
restrict parking on the street or in the tract during a four-hour period for street sweeping two
days per month.
Residential tracts were posted with signs at the entrance to the tract, residential areas
without defined entrances (downtown, old town) required individual street postings, and
signs were placed every 150 feet. Arterial streets (most of which did not allow parking prior
to twice-a-month street sweeping) were posted as necessary, and commercial and
industrial areas were not posted because they are swept between 3:00 AM and 6:00 AM
The city has made adjustments to the parking restriction program, including establishing
alternate side sweeping routes in neighborhoods where insufficient off-street parking was
available, and altering sweeping schedules to allow parents to pick up and drop off children
at school.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -3- 1/9101 9:01 AM
R,_,-.lUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTT,-. 4
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
PARKING ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
The Police Traffic Bureau is responsible for enforcing the posted parking restrictions. The
Police department's practice is to issue a citation only if the street sweeper must go around
a vehicle. Vehicles may park on a street during the four hour parking prohibition either
before or after the sweeper has come by and will not receive a citation.
The Police department has assigned two Parking Control Officers (PCO) to accompany
each street sweeper. This level of enforcement is necessary to ensure that the PCOs are
able to keep pace with the street sweeper.
PARKING CITATION ACTIVITY
Detailed information regarding parking citation activity and history is included with this
report as Attachment 1. The following chart displays the number of vehicles in the path of
the street sweepers before and at various times since the parking enforcement program
began.
Vehicles in the Path of Street Sweepers
35,000 - 3,1-00___...___ ____�
30,000 ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25,000 ----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------
20,000 ------ A ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
15,000 ------ •- - -------------------------- ---------------------------------
- -------------------------
Since Parking Enforcement
10,000 ------ ----------------------------------- --- -------------------------------------------------------------------
6,074 4,795 Low Nbnth Sept-Oct Avg
5,000 -------------- ----------- • ---------------2-,-176---------------2-,97-J--------
Also included in Attachment 1 is a graph depicting the volume of street sweeping citations
from January through October 2000. That data and graph illustrate a strong downward
trend for street sweeping parking citations.
When the City Council approved the parking enforcement program, staff predicted that,
based on other cities' experiences, the city would issue approximately 1,600 citations per
month once the program had been established and residents were accustomed to it.
Parking citation trend data (through October) indicates that the citation activity will reach
the predicted level in late 2001.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -4- 119/01 9:01 AM
1
R,-.4UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTI:,Ji
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
PARKING CITATION REVENUES AND TWICE-A-MONTH STREET SWEEPING
PROGRAM AND PARKING ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
Attachment 2 includes data regarding the revenues and expenditures associated with the
twice-a-month street sweeping and parking enforcement programs. A summary of that
information includes:
Through 10 months
Revenue $1,391,128
Expenditure (including start-up costs) $923,964
Difference $467,164
12-Month Projected Revenue & Expenditure
Revenue $1,603,320
Expenditure (including start-up costs) $1,052,536
Difference $550,784
Year Two Projected Revenue & Expenditure
Revenue $893,461
Expenditure $801,067
Difference $92,394
The data and graph included in Attachment 2 also indicate a strong downward trend for
street sweeping violation parking citations.
POTENTIAL PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS
In preparing this report, staff examined several potential modifications to the program:
1. Larger "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs
Prior to implementing street sweeping parking restrictions, staff studied the signage
programs in several other cities to determine industry practice and consulted the City
Attorney to ensure the posting program was legally sufficient. Staff then posted "No
Parking for Street Sweeping" signs, as necessary, throughout the city at a cost of
approximately $100,000. The signage and enforcement program has been effective in
reducing the number of vehicles parked in the street sweeper's path, but larger signs
could help reduce the number of parking citations.
Staff recommends increasing the size of tract entrance signs, from 18"x24" to 24"x30",
as they need to be replaced. The larger signs are more likely to be seen by drivers
unfamiliar with the program, accomplishing the goals of ensuring a clear path for the
street sweeper and reducing the number of parking citations. This solution would also
have little visual impact.
Staff does not recommend increasing the size of the signs posted every 150 feet in the
areas of the city without defined areas. Those signs are 12" x 18", the same size as all
other "No Parking" signs in the city and are very noticeable. Increasing their size would
likely not be effective in reducing the number of parking citations issued and would
cause more visual clutter.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -5- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
r " UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTT,
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
2. Posting "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs every 150 feet
Staff does not recommend posting "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs every 150
feet throughout the city. Currently, only areas without defined entrances (downtown, old
town) are signed every 150 feet. Areas with defined entrances — nearly every
residential housing tract — have signs only at the entrance to the tract. Posting "No
Parking for Street Sweeping" signs throughout all the city's residential housing tracts
would be very expensive (Public Works staff estimates $1 million) and would have a
significant, negative visual impact.
3. Citywide Alternate Side Street Sweeping
As Attachment 3 illustrates, approximately eight percent of city streets are swept on an
alternate side schedule. This sweeping option was employed in high density areas
where the vehicle counts conducted prior to the start of the twice-a-month street
sweeping program predicted they would be necessary (old town, downtown, the area
around Warner and Bolsa Chica, and Beach and Edinger).
Staff does not recommend implementing citywide alternate side street sweeping.
Through the first year of the twice-a-month street sweeping program, Public Works staff
has not identified any areas of the city where they believe alternate side sweeping
would significantly reduce the number of vehicles in the street.
Undertaking an alternate side sweeping program would require Public Works staff to
post "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs every 150 feet throughout the city. The
cost of the additional signage would be approximately $1 million, plus the cost to
replace the signs as they deteriorate. Program operating costs would also increase
significantly due to the large number of cul-de-sac streets in Huntington Beach.
Cul-de-sac streets make designing efficient street sweeping routes extremely difficult.
Street sweepers would drive the length of each cul-de-sac in the city four times during a
street sweeping cycle (eight time each month). For example, Monday a street sweeper
would drive into the cul-de-sac to sweep the right side of the street and then drive back
out down the middle of the street. On Tuesday, the street sweeper would drive into the
cul-de-sac down the middle of the street and drive back out sweeping the left side of the
street. The trips down the middle of the street (where the sweeper would be forced to
travel to avoid parked cars) are inefficient because there is little debris to be collected
from the middle of local streets.
Currently, street sweepers make the trip around the cul-de-sac, sweeping both sides
once per street sweeping cycle and twice a month.
Because cul-de-sacs create inefficient routes in an alternate side of the street program,
the city's street sweeping program would have to be increased from four street
sweepers (two city staff, two contract) to at least six and possibly eight street sweepers.
This expansion would increase the cost of the program between 50 and 100 percent or
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -6- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
AUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTT '
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
an additional $415,000 to $825,000 annually. The gross program cost would escalate
to between $1.23 million and $1.65 million annually.
If alternate side sweeping did not result in a reduction in the volume of street sweeping
citations, the net program cost (in excess of revenues) would be between $530,000 and
$700,000, well above the $250,000 General Fund expenditure for street sweeping in FY
1998-99.
Staff is uncertain that an alternate side sweeping program would result in a substantial
reduction in the number of parking citations issued. The revised program would likely
result in the same surprise and confusion experienced in the city's return to twice-a-
month street sweeping, reversing the strong downward trend in parking citation activity.
Were an alternate side sweeping program to result in a reduction in the number of
parking citations being issued, the net cost of the program to the General Fund could
easily exceed $1 million annually.
4. Reduce Parking Enforcement Efforts
The Police department currently assigns two Parking Control Officers to accompany
each street sweeper through its route. This level of enforcement is necessary to ensure
the PCOs are able to keep pace with the street sweeper as it drives its route.
Staff does not recommend reducing the parking enforcement efforts. Enforcement of
the "No Parking for Street Sweeping" restrictions has been extremely effective in
encouraging the removal of cars from the street sweepers' routes, enabled the
sweepers to operate more effectively, resulted in cleaner streets, and reduced the
amount of debris contaminating the city's storm drain system and coastal waters.
The Police department's parking enforcement efforts have also resulted in a significant
reduction in the number of abandoned vehicles on city streets.
5. Alter Street Sweeping Schedules
The first full year of the twice-a-month street sweeping program has resulted in only one
significant change to the original street sweeping schedule — changes made to
accommodate students being dropped off and picked up at school.
Parking enforcement and street sweeping are suspended on city holidays and may be
cancelled because of rain. In most cases, when the street sweepers are working in light
rain, the Police department will not deploy Parking Control Officers because many
vehicle owners do not expect the street sweepers to be working during any rain,
regardless of how heavy. Parking Control Officers are typically deployed for afternoon
street sweeping routes (12:00 — 4:00 PM) if it has rained in the morning but stopped
before noon. Parking Control Officers are typically not deployed in the middle of a
sweeping route if rain stops, they either accompany the sweepers at their start times
(8:00 AM or 12:00 PM) or not at all.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -7- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
R .iUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTI.,
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
Staff recommends that parking citations for street sweeping violations not be issued
from December 24 through January 2. While all these days, except Christmas and New
Years Day, are normal city business days, and staff believes the street sweepers
should still operate, many residents entertain guests who may be unfamiliar with the
street sweeping program, or are at home themselves during this time and may find off-
street parking hard to come by. Having the street sweepers operate without parking
enforcement provides a good compromise of continuing to clean the streets and not
issuing citations to drivers unfamiliar with, or unable to comply with, the street sweeping
parking restrictions.
Staff does not recommend any schedule changes to the twice-a-month street sweeping
program. Adding additional no street sweeping days would leave city crews idle, would
result in more routes being swept only once in a four week period, will likely create
confusion regarding the enforcement program, and could result in more complaints or
requests for exception from the program.
6. Earmark Street Sweeping Parking Citation Revenues
Currently, the revenue generated by street sweeping parking citations is recorded in the
city's General Fund. The General Fund also supports the cost of providing the twice-a-
month street sweeping and parking enforcement programs.
Staff is projecting that program-related revenues will exceed expenditures by
approximately $470,000 in the first year of the program. In year two, the revenues are
projected to exceed expenditures by $92,000. In year three forward, the program will
operate with a deficit, eventually (likely year eight) requiring a larger General Fund
subsidy than the once-a-month street sweeping program did.
Staff does not recommend earmarking street sweeping parking citation revenues simply
because the program is unlikely to produce revenues in excess of expenditures after
the current fiscal year.
CONCLUSION
Recognizing that the adjustment period for the twice-a-month street sweeping with
enforced parking restrictions has been a difficult one, staff believes that it is an effective
program and should continue intact with the changes recommended in this report. Namely,
installing larger "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs when the existing signs wear out
and not enforcing the parking restrictions from December 24 through January 2.
Parking citations are on a strong downward trend and should reach the on-going level staff
projected (approximately 1,600 citations per month) in late 2001. Both the Public Works
department and the City Council Office have also experienced a significant decrease in the
number of complaints and inquiries from the public regarding the program. In fact, it is now
common for staff to receive calls asking why a street was not swept or why citations were
not issued for a vehicle in violation of the parking restrictions.
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -8- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
I% ..IUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTT,
MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:
Posting "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs and enforcing those restrictions has also
resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of cars parked in the street sweeper's path.
Having fewer cars in the street sweepers' paths has enabled the street sweepers to collect
more debris, as has sweeping streets twice-a-month. Improved debris collection has
enhanced the appearance of city streets, produced a significant reduction in the amount of
debris being cleaned from the city storm drain system, and is an important component of
the city's strategies to protect and clean its beaches and coastal waters.
Attachment(s):
NumberCity Clerk's
Page . .
1. Parking Citation Activity & History
2. Parking Citation Revenues and Twice-a-Month Street Sweeping
Program and Parking Enforcement Program Expenditures
3. Twice-a-Month Street Sweeping Route Map
RCA for Street Sweeping Citations -9- 1/9/01 9:01 AM
Attachment 1
�
Parking Citation
Activity & History
CitationsStreet Change All Change Total Change Street
. Sweeping From • Other
Oct1 1 1 Citations Month Citations Month Citations Month %of Total
January 6,074 N/A 1,561 N/A 7,635 N/A 79.6%
February 5,296 -12.8% 1,450 -7.1% 6,746 -11.6% 78.5%
March 5,073 -4.2% 1,391 -4.1% 6,464 -4.2% 78.5%
April 5,374 5.9% 1,479 6.3% 6,853 6.0% 78.4%
May 4,751 -11.6% 1,878 27.0% 6,629 -3.3% 71.7%
June 5,510 16.0% 2,732 45.5% 8,242 24.3% 66.9%
July 4,903 -11.0% 3,559 30.3% 8,462 2.7% 57.9%
August 5,021 2.4% 2,448 -31.2% 7,469 -11.7% 67.2%
September 2,176 -56.7% 2,734 11.7% 4,909 -34.3% 44.3%
October 3,774 73.4% 1,619 -40.8% 5,394 9.9% 70.0%
TOTAL1 68,803
OtherCitations Issued Street Change All Change Total Change Street
6 Months Prior Sweeping From Prior
. Enforcement Citations . .ns Month Citations . of Total
June 1999 760 N/A 3,070 N/A 3,830 N/A 19.8%
July 439 -42.2% 4,310 40.39% 4,749 24.0% 9.2%
August Warning -100.0% 3,057 -29.07% 3,057 -35.6% N/A
September Period N/A 2,720 -11.02% 2,720 -11.0% N/A
October No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
November Citations N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
December Issued N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL1
DIFFERENCE 46,753 N/A 7,694 N/A 54,447 N/A 85.87%
(Jan thru Oct- 6 months prior)
PC Activity & History 10 1/9/01
1
Parking Citation
Activity & History Continued
Vehicles in the 5-Month
Since Enforcement
Path of . Before High • • Sept-Oct
SweepersPosting
Number of vehicles 33,100 6,074 4,795 2,176 2,975
Difference from 5-month average N/A (27,026) (28,305) (30,924) (30,125)
% change from 5-month avgerage N/A -81.65% -85.51% -93.43% -91.01%
Difference from high month (27,026) N/A (1,279) (3,898) (3,099)
% change from high month -444.95% N/A -21.05% -64.18% -51.02%
Vehicles in the Path of Street Sweepers
35,000
30,000 -
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
6,074 4,795 2,975
Low Month
5,000 2,176 se t-Oct Avg
PC Activity & History 2 11 1/5/01
Street Sweeping Parking Citation Activity
January - October 2000
7,000 -
6,074
6,000 -
5,374 5,510
5,296
5,000 -5;02--1
5,073 4,903
4,751
4,000
3,774
3,000
2,000 - 2,176
Trendline
predicted through April 2001
1,000 - (+6 months)
0 -
�Ja� `Jai a�Gr PQ�\ �a� ��c� �J�� �J�` ��c o��` •� Trendline predicted through
�a x�� PJ Q 0�` April 2001 (+6 months)
0�
Cost, Quality & Inspection Reporting 12 1/5/01
Attachment 2
Street Sweeping Parking Citation Revenues &
Twice-a-Month Street Sweeping Program and Parking Citation
Program Expenditures
Revenues Actual Projected Projected
Expenditures Actual Projected Projected
Future Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th year 7th Year
Projections Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Difference (General
°Start-up costs include the cost of the first two months of the contract with Nationwide that have
been excluded from the analysis, costs to equip additional parking control officers, making and
posting the "No Parking for Street Sweeping" signs, and other related expenditures.
Projections:
Assumes a three percent increase in the city's operating costs and in disposal costs. The
contractor's operations are projected with the 11 percent increase Nationwide requested onOot'17'
OO.
Citation revenue projections are weighted toward the last three month's actual activity and assume a
steady decrease in citations through late 2001, when the citation activity trend indicates the projected
average of number of citations per month will ba reached. The assumption includes a14.27percent
increase in activity during the summer months, based onFY08'00data.
Revenuo'CoatCompariuon 13 1/5/01
Parking Citation Revenue
a:Activity & History
ChangeCitation Street All Total Change Street
Other,Revenue Sweeping
By Year Citations Citations Citations Year Year Percent of Total
FY 98-99- N/A N/A $1,368,278 N/A N/A N/A
FY 99-00 $1,270,176 $977,076 $2,247,252 $878,974 64.24% 56.52%
FY 00-01 $120,952 $83,498 $204,450 N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL1 .1 :1
excluding FY 98-99
Citation Prior to Since Since Change Change
Revenue Enforcement Enforcement Enforcement From Prior From Prior
By Month FY 98-99* FY 11 00-01 Year Year
October N/A $5,217 $120,952 $115,735 2218%
November N/A $171 - N/A N/A
December N/A $3,871 - N/A N/A
January N/A $68,995 - N/A N/A
February N/A $122,399 - N/A N/A
March N/A $151,352 - N/A N/A
April N/A $155,526 - N/A N/A
May N/A $162,931 - N/A N/A
June N/A $152,772 - N/A N/A
July N/A $159,786 - N/A N/A
August N/A $159,822 - N/A N/A
September N/A $127,334 - N/A N/A
TOTAL1 1
Citation Prior to Since Since Change Change
Revenue Enforcement Enforcement Enforcement From Prior From Prior
By Month FY 98-99* FY 11 00-01 Year Year'
October N/A 101 3,375 3,274 3242%
November N/A 4 - N/A N/A
December N/A 74 - N/A N/A
January N/A 2,130 - N/A N/A
February N/A 3,744 - N/A N/A
March N/A 4,513 - N/A N/A
April N/A 4,518 - N/A N/A
May N/A 4,832 - N/A N/A
June N/A 4,422 - N/A N/A
July N/A 4,602 - N/A N/A
August N/A 4,653 - N/A N/A
September N/A 3,502 - N/A N/A
'TOTAL1 •
" Prior to twice-a-month street sweeping, the city did not track street sweeping parking citation revenue
separate from total parking citation revenue.
"" Enforcement of the posted "No Parking for Street Sweeping"signs began in January 2000.
PC Revenue Activity& History 14 1/9/01
Street Sweeping Parking Citation Revenue
October 1999 - October 2000
$180,000 -
$155,526 $162,931 $159,786 $159,822
$160,000 - —
$151,352
$152,772
$140,000 -
$120,952
$122,399 $127,334
$120,000 -
$100,000 - x
Trendline
$80,000 - —
$68,995
$60,000 -
$40,000 -
$20,000 -
$5,217 $171
$0 - $3,871
&
� O
5
Cost, Quality& Inspection Reporting 15 1/5/01
Attachment 3
CDR
- TREET SWEEPING
1,7
128
B o I s a -W"C",
Mc FaddenA.
147
r{,::.:%f,`.:•r,JfJ;,: Jf' •f1,1.,fj ;J:f/:t t ;•/.,,:.'. t J•; .;-.y.,_'. :''F;•'�','• �id�Yfl eII'
/ .• :r r`i' ,,/,•;�t f• .fJ it _r.i'�', .. ,..L<u;
1.57
'!rr;/rr Ji J.tr,'fJ :f: J: ;+t r•t ,+: 'Jtrt _ ;h Hell
165 166 167
Warner
175 176 177 - 271 272 273;
Slater
186 187 281 282 283 Talbert
197 291 292 293 Ells
318 319 411 �4: 413
� � 3
327 32S 329 421 11 423 424 425illadianapolis
Garfield
flat 3�'� --------
MON. TUES. WEED. TH URS. �+'fl8I[. 318 t < 434 435 Yorktown
3.- ,"4 � ) -1. 1
3 $ 349 41 444 Adams
3 5g 45 454
tad & 4th 1 g
MON. TUES. WED. THURS. FRII. 461 Atlanta
464 466 467
474 475 476 Hamilton
484 485 486 ]Banning
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Administration
SUBJECT: Street Sweeping Citations
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 16, 2001
R.CA TA H M.E N,TS
STATUS
�. a ,�.,,.,��
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
i
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
1 1 1 ; ; ti
�3'113v1a''d?,' ,..
,. EXPLANATION'FOR MI'S'SING°'ATTA33 HM'ENTS
REVIEWED ' RETURNED FORWARDED
Administrative Staff ( ) ( )
Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( )
City Administrator (Initial)
City Clerk ( )
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use
RCA Author: Grant
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Approved Recommended Action - May 1, 2000 - (7-0) �
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Pam Julien, City Council Member
DATE: April 20, 2000
SUBJECT: "H" Item for the May 1, 2000 City Council Meeting
Street Sweeping
Statement of Issue
At the February 22, 2000 City Council Meeting, staff was directed to prepare a report of
the feasibility of alternate side street sweeping in areas of the city which have alley
access to garages. The staff report is now complete and is attached for your review and
consideration.
Recommended Action
Approve a motion to:
1. Direct staff to bring back the report to City Council for further consideration and
action following the completion of the one year side-by-side managed competition
sweeping program.
enc.
xc Ray Silver
Melanie Fallon
Connie Brockway
R A �
1
e'
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
TO: Ray Silver, City Administrator
FROM: Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Alternate Side Street Sweeping Report
DATE: April 7, 2000
ISSUE
The City Council directed staff to prepare a report on the feasibility of alternate side
street sweeping in any areas of the City typical of the Downtown area that has alley
access to garages. The report should include all costs associated with any additional
required sweeping.
ANALYSIS
Although there are numerous areas in the City where residents have alley access to
garages, only five are posted for alternate side sweeping:
• The Downtown
• The Southwest Beach Boulevard quadrangle (bounded by Alabama, Atlanta,
Beach and Clay)
• A district (RD 165) east of Huntington Harbor
• Two small areas just northwest and southwest of the junction of Beach Boulevard
and Heil Avenue
These areas all share one common characteristic: they are primarily high-density
developments with many apartment units.
When the City's street sweeping program was expanded in 1999, the criterion adopted
for establishing alternate side sweeping was high density. This was done in the interest
of cost efficiency since alternate side sweeping is more expensive than sweeping both
sides of a street on the same day.
The Maintenance Division evaluated the feasibility of alternate side sweeping in the 35
districts where alley access to garages exists. The results are listed below:
1. The locations are not concentrated within a specific geographic area; hence
substantial changes in the sweeping schedule would be necessary. In some
tracts, for example, there are only a few units with alley access.
Revised Alternative Side Street Sweeping 1 DOC.doc
Page Two
2. Eighteen (18) locations front arterial streets where on-street parking is either
prohibited or severely restricted. Therefore, alternate side sweeping in those
locations would not be possible.
3. The individual locations do not warrant posting an entire tract for alternate side
sweeping; hence double signage would be required. This would be confusing to
the public.
In addition, the number of citations issued within all 35 locations is not indicative of any
serious parking problems.
ADDITIONAL COSTS
There are two cost components that must be addressed when contemplating any
change in a posted street sweeping program: additional signage and additional
sweeping time. The costs for alternate side sweeping in the areas of concern are
discussed below.
The signage costs include both the initial installation, annual maintenance of the signs
and the removal of existing signs where necessary. These costs are for individual
street locations and are based on the assumption that only the streets with alley access
to garages would be added to the alternate day sweeping schedule.
SIGN INSTALLATION COSTS
Item Total Cost
1,180 12" X 18" Signs with Hardware $ 56,000
Labor to Install Signs 16,000
Labor to Remove 119 Existing Signs (4 per hour) 750
Total
SIGN MAINTENANCE COSTS
Item Annual Cost
Replace Signs at a 10% Loss Rate Per Year* $7,100
SWEEPING COSTS
The cost for additional sweeping cannot be calculated until changes in the existing route
schedules are known based on adding one or more of locations to the alternate side
sweeping schedule. However, because most of these areas are small, with limited
mileage, and are widely dispersed, it is anticipated that the additional expense would be
substantial. Additionally, any increase in the existing level of service would have to be
equally split between the contract sweeper and City forces, as the street sweeping
Page Three
service is currently a managed competition program. Any addition to the alternate side
schedule would necessitate adding resources.
RECOMMENDATION
At this time, staff does not recommend including any of the locations in the alternate
side street sweeping schedule. However, we will continue to monitor each of these
locations and recommend any needed changes.
ATTACHMENTS
Available upon request.
RFB:gc
ATTACHMENT # 1
R1,01
y.
f�.t�`� 1�.t'F�,�� ,�,��ir.;�ti
MO 7
no
l
'/i Old;
FO 0
UN
�«�!i / *�Imam,
�ii! ��
'i • � 1 1 ' 1 , , 1 � •
ATTACHMENT #2
SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS
Map References: On the table below RD refers to "Reporting District" on a City
map. Location means street segment (given first) with boundary streets
following. No. Lots indicates how many lots are impacted (with the number
fronting the street segment in parenthesis). No. Signs is the number of signs
that would be required to legally post the area.
���� :,:3,:r;�.,.�!;rr i�°.;c„ ;,:��' a,„�: axs �:rs�,?>i.
RD a.Locafion �.��.�!. 9�„ M
��, '. .. ,3�� ��.r,.,..,,,� � No�. Lots_ No,�y�Si ns.z.��
136 N/S McFadden: Bolsa Chica to Cambay 25 (16) � 11
146 S/S McFadden: Bolsa Chica to Pelican 12 (6) 6
147 N/S Cross: Graham/Taft/ Reno 19 (6) 21
155 E/S Waikiki: Edinger to Hilo 25 (9) 28
156 S/S Edinger: Bolsa Chica to Graham 73 (39) 50
157 S/S Edinger: e/o Graham 46 (23) 50
N/S Heil: e/o Graham
166 Regina Circle s/o Heil 18 (18) 8
175 E/S Sandra Lee: Warner to Orion 17 (16) 14
W/S Sims: Warner to Orion
176 S/S Dunbar: Leslie to Harbor Bluffs 22 (5) 10
178 Pinehurst: Summerdale/ Grove/ Evergreen 31 (31) 30
252 Volga/Amazon: Ganges/ Sher 67 (56) 30
253 Malaga: La Paz to San Angelo 23 (23) 20
261 E/S Golden West: Norm to Heil 162 (98) 92
S/S Heil: e/o Golden West
Bartlett/ Kellog/ Sabo/ Delton
La Mancha/ Bardon/ Corsican
Toulouse/ Lilac/ Elk
263 A Street: Warner to Robidoux 106 (90) 34
B Street: Warner to Robidoux
Minoru: Warner to Saru Circle
Tamaru: Minoru to Newland
271 Golden West: Ford to Betty 11 (5) 5
272 Emerald: Cypress to Fir 271 (271) 88
Jacquelyn/ Koledo/ Queens/ Mandrell/ Barton
Keelson n/o Slater
273 A Street: Warner to Blaylock 65 (58) 30
B Street: Warner to Blaylock
Zeider Lane: Slater to Friesland
282 Bell/ Ronald/ Jacquelyn @ Liberty 53 (18) 40
283 Slater @ Van Buren 13 (9) 14
292 Ellis: Delaware to Steep 22 (11) 20
293 SW Talbert @ Newland 58 (16) 32
Forelle: Patterson to Goodwin
Map References: page 2
"A 1", "?
412 Amberleaf Circle 21 (21) 8
413 Dernion Lane 34 (34) 16
423 W/S Newland: Bridgeport to Milford .70 (38) 32
N/S,Yorktown: Newland to n/o Harding
443 N/S Indianapolis: Newland to O.C.F.C.D. 70 (33) . 34
W/S Newland n/o Indianapolis
453 S/S Indianapolis: Newland to O.C.F.C.D. 47 (18) 24
N/S Atlanta e/o Schooner
463 Hillhead/ Doncaster/ Lomond: Newland to 60 (60) 32
Lochlea
475 W/S Bushard: Rambler to Mokihana 16 (8) 10
154 Harbor Lane: Star to Fisher 4 (4) 8
164 (Christiana Bay Town Homes)
173 Aladdin Drive: Weatherly to Sceptre 28 (20) 21
174 (Weatherly Bay Town Homes)
431 Main/ Park/ Lake/ Palm 695 (276) 360
441 (Civic Center Triangle)
451
Total Signs: 1 1,178
The next 31 pages contain RD.Maps in the order listed above with access
alleys 'Marked in orange.
ATTACHMENT #3
CITY REPORTING DISTRICT MAPS
FOR
EACH LOCATION WITH ALLEY
ACCESS TO GARAGE
(31 MAPS)
BO�SA �,1-1 -A
5001 5002 001 5002 5001 5002 5001
5021 5022 50I1 5022 5021 5022 N 5021 W C N c
Y• N N
1031 $012 D ^^5011�5032 D 50I1 5032 D 503,
5041 5042 $041 5042 5041 5042 Z 5041
5061 5062 D 5061 506I 5061 5062 5061 5011
5071 5072 Z 5071 $072 5071 5072 5071
5081 5082 5081 5082 5081 5082 5081
5081 $082
5091 5092 47 5011 1092 5091 5092 5091
5101 5102 ZJ 5101 5102 5101 5102 5101
ANDAMAN LN. 5111
IODIZE " ° 5122
N U N u N 5122 5121 u TRITON1 Sll7
5121 I �+ N o •o `at; N N N m 5142
S!]1 N N Sll2 5131 N u m m 51/2
fJ \ U to U U N u N N N
5151 5152 5151 $151
S161 1544 BA F FIN C R. 5161 " - -
m 5202 sill 5192
5171 1C,S1 1'� ^ ^� u 5172 5171 5162 5194
5196
5191 1L N N N N 5192 5191 5191 $202
5202
s212
5I01 c m M Y N 5202 3201 N OY 5212
N
CAMBAY " N 5202 5242
5I12 � 5212 co
n N N of t52
N A 5211O 526: (rn-
D D o 5252
5271
IT)
Z, CHEMICAL LN. 5102 5221
N slul 5122
J
N N
51/1 5101 5112
5112 5711 5342
$ill c 5782 5351 5151
SISI 5362 57:,1 SL 5161 5402
A $182
H 5381
rn
53;1 51:2 5331 S181 5402
O 5391 0 $416 5391 3411
;U
5101 5402 5431 5402 54ul $112 542 $406
5196
Sul 5442 5412
A21 5422
5:I1 SS22 Sill 5422 5432
5462
5/21 54S4
5451 3452 5111 5452 E
S/51
5402
NS�:2 Y 5181 s'uI 3482 5471
s/st
GRAHAM
BOLSA CHICA
1sJJ w G g r o o 5001 500 S00 5002 001 500 001 5002 v $001 Soo 5001 Soo $00 5002
O 5021 5012 m S02 5022 021 307 D 5021 5022 O 5021 502 = 5021 5022 L
so:1 5027
SOQ ORIOLE LN. Z 50J1 SO72 SO] salt D SOII 30)2 C m sal] salt rn D
5041 D D 1 5032 -1 5031 5032
N SOIL q42l/I 5012 SO/1 R1 _ 5011 5012 f-• SO/1 5017 5011 5012 N 5011 3012 5011 5017
52 'D 5012 ` SOU 5042 O D7C 5061 5061 5062 8 5061 5067 D 5061 5062 z O $OS1 SOS2 Z 5051 SOS: m 3061 $ob:
5062 "( v .,� S06! 3062 SO/1 SOS1 -1
r 5071 50)1 SOTI 5072 0 SO)7 O So)1 5072 ~ G 3071 3072
5072 D 0)1 3071 3072 7 07 Y ' G a .uJ.
Sou 50I1 Sou 0 5011 5012 001 5082 SOe1 5002 5001 50e2
so92 5091 $092 5091 5092 5091 0 5091 So92 so91 5092 5091 5092 PELICAN LN
5701 5101 5101 3101 C) n (7
510I 101 10I M 5101 5102 .ZI 5101 5102 ;1 5101 5107 I G ti N
511I 5121 5122 5ul 5112 BLUEBIRD LN 5111~111 R T..
S1I1 5122 5121 5122
3122 G G G G G I G I G I G i G
n su2 5111 N •�31 NG G u Nr --j i
o
5131 5132 S171 513I W O
5132 .- : Z- � N 5111 N
I
s12 5141 Z
4i51 S1Si o f
5151
GC GY
{ O
S16I $161 5162 5161 5162 SWAN LN 5161 00 z
Sill 3111 N N u N u `' 5171 v Q
o
S112 5182 a o J J J J
u ~ ~ �5 5172
111 n
— 5191 519 5191 5192 = Om
Z
51I2 s2 . Z
5201 os202 m
s YL O m n
m HUMMINGBIRD O O
5202. 5221
Z
m5266 � `-.. G N .- �•� 5232 D
5266 J J J
T
5272 rHEMCAL N 'Z11
5291G 5292 5285 `~" 52e2 A sle1 -
m S2e5�, 5286 �„ w 5291 P, N GL" lGC 5722
SI1
5292 " t
N 5705 P.o
5306 5333 33 2
5 312 5112 c 5305
0 5355 SSSz
$361
SJ72 Z 51J1 5]]2 61 u' a 5372
-
Q 5382 - - - -
5362 � 5361 5162 0 IN LN
5361 - 5362 :u - " -
I5001 5375 •S•1n2 o q '. 5412
5392 5381 5J82 N
MANUFACTURE LN. 5395 S412
5405 5406
w m PN S/1S S442
(� 5432 5431 5432 slit 5162
-i Nm INDUSTRY LN.
D C !2 5456 5455 54S6 5455 G
3484-94
5402 5401
GRAHAM (147)
MC FADDEN
15501-SA 15522 <
Z
J 15502-A6 2 Chapel ISS32 Calvary Z ;� J
J J ^
1550i-A8 N '^
_ 15542 ISS41 A-1•
IS561 A-I•
15511 15552 15561 15572
ssv.1 15541 _ I555:
15552-92 15581 15561 15571 A-1• 15561 1559:
15571 ISS72 ISS91 15592 15531 15571 1560:
15598 15601 H 8 CITY STORM DRAt
I562I IS61ri A-1• x
15573 1S602 ISe22
I Selt 15611 U
156]2
IS602-A2 15641 15622
156A1 15632 A-I:
1563: 15662
15635-AS W rr 15662 t5661 A-6 15682
y uj
H W
IS662 W 15661 U U
15655mi.7 15662 15661 O O 15702
IS672 Ov _ U - _ 2
15671
0 o a
15681 n •^ 15681 t5692 •'• •^ SG..2D-- .
RESEARCH MDR. WJQ
�
Q 1570:
it Z
Q 15712
ENO C 15722 a_IS'2: z
0 IS73: •"I 15732 Aj
•O .
1'- 15752
LL
e
n Q 15762
H
CROSS DR
W
GRAHAM c rf
BRANCH _ m V
LIBRARY MARNA HIGH SCHOOL
PARK (15871 SPRINGDALEI
0
BRIDGE o 6
C. 947.76 F. C.
EDINGER
147
(NO THRU STREET)
a
r- l
N r .� § $ $ SS SANTASIA � L N
1541 5J2 0 4Sll 4512 = 4511 ISJ2 45J1 4122 C 4531 ISJ2 -V542 m 4541 4542 D454, 4542 Z 4541 4542 Zi4541 4542 m4561 m I5s 4552 M ISSL 4552 N 4551 I5s2 fCTI ISSI IS S2 m 1551 /552 C g u $ $
r- Q1 Is72 IJ
X Isn Isn � Isn Is72 w Isn I572 � un Isn Isn I572 mfiRA r CR.
/582-92 O 4581 Is82 4581 4582 8 4581 Is82 4581 Is82r- 592IS9l 4592 4591 4592 4591 4592 4591 4592 4591 4592
1617 r D 1601 460I 1601 1602 1601 1602 4601 4602 § $ $ $
Ih.l; U m /607 /60l 1602 4611 4612 4611 4612 4611 4612 4611 1622 .• r 2S
cn /611 161: WALT Z C R.
4122 4621 4622 4621 1672 4621 4622 4621 4622
lh l! 4621 4622
1 4611 4612 4611 4622 4611 46J2 4631 4612 $ $ S
46J1 46J2 N w N N
1641 4642 1611 1612 4611 4642 4641 4642
_ 4641 4642 0 00 _ Ia S $ $ $ P
Ih 4651 4652 �1 4651 4652 /6S1 1652 rlp
4650 4651 4652 46SI 4652 1662 4661 4662 1661 1662 4661 466 8ALLAD/671 4672O 4672 4671 4672 4621 1672 q/692 46911692
a) 4691 4692 0 Cl 4691 N
j1 1702 ?o 4701 4702
Inul n 4701 1702 4101
4711 4712
J6„ = 9717 OPERA LN MELODY LN.
4722
rn
m
,
m yp
rim 4742 N r r r r r P r a
r v n O '• N u ur' r r. 2
p n 4752 r e m a U
4762 HONOLULU r LN. 4761 O = n C)
.�+ m
4772 ~{*i C n 4771 V2 m S n
0 4782 4101 = Z I"m
4792 'a' P % ti 0 4001 D 0
4802 HAWAII rLr Iet 7C r'M m
WATERWAY C 4012 a r -
a N N P a 4831
4822
N N pN N N N N N N
411 t2 4012
6T N 4942
-- a 2 WAIKIKI LN.
Ies
482 4861 4862 O 4861 4062 4861 4862 = 1861 4862 490
D2 4872 4071 4872 2 4571 4872 � 4271 4872 r— 1,71 Ie82 0 4881 ti N 7� N >r
C 1e91 Ie92 C 1891 1892 /8,1 Ie92 O D 1e 91
1992 4891 4092
/901 �'Z 4901
1901 4902
m—{ 4902 4901 4902 4901 4902 4901
1902
Z•
4911 4912 4911 4912 4911 4917 a Q
4/911
49112 21 921 4911 P
000
00^
/90 l
19
19224922 192
1921 1922 1921 197Q
4 491
195 495 5FU
CO) 49 1971 1995
-� X 4952 9511951 1952
9 47P
BOLSA CHICA
BOLSA CHICA
Q7 h pIfF z ; 5007
� Y
co -U OI 1072n TOMAS
LN
N Gj QI y 5072 (A S03
(Y�
4 y p
so u(n 5051 5053 5051 sos2r 3031 5037 f01
5052 5052
p 501 s067 CC) Z 5061 5062 SOILO soa2 so oar son so so77 $anwI7
S p
n D �» SOeI sou :< SOeI 5ot7 1072
D r SOIL 5012 m SOIL ,
I{i 5082 soft soft Soft Soft U42
rtl Sall soft soil
M o a I = slot 3102 slat 5092
slot slot
s 5102 Sill sill sill Sli] tu S sill
(L f -0 5112 su1 Sul sL21 p stta Stu
5123 Sul 3132 5121 S122
Sill3TT Sul
�-l��T•' i"�—rr " �' a�^ �a �'�'-F 9 sill SIII 17. 5132 sill silt S132.
,.. w $ 5111 list
Ln 1117 $1S1 5152 :0 3131 t t: C o
51s S ARATOGA" " L N is my 3162 F " stsl
Sin s161 5161 SANDRA LN $161 3162
3 , 3161 liltS171 1172
Si3162 ^ a " R ill 5117 7 sill slaIm
51f1 sill D sill Sll2
3111 5701 5202
slot !tu Z GOLDEN GATEy LN o 5201 5212 C G § 0
= s:m m " a " WARREN " LN. Z
m s2u snJ m C o 7 k Y silt s727 a G)
5771 .~. 1 St1 G G r " S s 9C m
5211 5717 Y p M Y silt $242 ^� M S d ` Stu
fl27
"SANTA ANITA LN I" s2 " "TX1,2
s257
25L 5272 SCHRYER LNS272
7271 52f1 N 3 i s2stet O 30 sl5707
DEL MAR LN sift 5717 < si 5 112
13OL slot ` " M- ---
"u Slot s772 r 5322 n 37J1sn2
Silt 11 ^ N5311 (lS]]7 ( 37u (A slits772
Slt2 U !]17 (n �j m Slu Z 3711
s3u
sill ARLINGTON LN 1112 (n 5 m sloe $15t
rn u!2
5757 7737 o N IY G p! s71L m s762 Q 5312 LIL ES LN
Slat 5762 ti �+ �+ �a'' S77] Z s772 $371
Z 316J
37�1 S]e] o J w n 3)e2 -{ = 5712 51n
f1U1 5372
Slf S102 ~B AYS HOR E" L N slat vf2 O 5192 sin
3107 .r. 5Ie7
5791 5/02 5101
5112 m ?i � m u Y G n P yq v Gj slot 3717
G w CS C slot p $112 5411
su2 m �- .. .. .. .- ,., 5/u 0 s107
5172 w �•
$43 k F § SIl1 N 5421 SU7 C G S10I S1I1
545 . HOLLYWOOD LN s111 DAVIS" 'LN s1/1 .
ISl S/57 r ,.
1n 316 o k " c -. 5461 3 C u =
5
GRAHAM
GRAHAM
issot �0•i, �Op,
SSII SSI r ■ °' S e. u G � c § $ � �`�t SSOI
EAGLE " f
ss11 Ssl: q ■LN SS 5522
5511 F S I: x �"„ r " " a w # 5532
5312 ""' ^yJ+ "� X 21 w I °'! " r 3551 5552 sS5
sssl sss? OO G o k T Y _ Q G wl a w ti s; 3 ss{ ss1:
H I� a Asa ss{3 n
5561 5562 7r73 BIRDIE £ G G G ."'. 2 5571 SS72 S57 5S62
S s11 $582 0* , LN G7 5511 5312 55" 5372
5391 5592 0 o u ■ a " _ C 5591 5592 m SSfI S592 ,
5591 SSf2 r S591 5592
s602 5601 w fr n 3 5601 $601
5601 S611 "� f 5601 5602 =j 5601 5602 560)
56ll 5612 5611 5612 C D ...� 56U 5612 5611
5621 5611 5612 5611 5612 5613
$622 5621 5627 ACE LN. m Sc71 S{:: Sal 5622 5621 56::
56 t1 561 5621: 5627
56/l Sill 56ll ; 56)l 3637 _ 56ll 5627 56ll 5672 5611 5611 S631 SU2
5642 5641 5642 D 1611 1612 1 (.11 SiSI
�j 5651 5652 5651 5652 1131 5652
3631 5652 5651 5652 = 5651 5652 56 SI O 771 S661 5662 5661 5652
D 56{1 5662 5661 5661
Sal 5667 3661 5662 56ll N 33 5671 5672 5671 Sn2 S67L 56ll 56ll S6{1
5627 5671 5677 r— 6ll S677 0 561t 56e2 56ll 56e] $6ll 56ll
Z 56ll 56ll 5691
5691 5612 5691 5692 56U 3697 $6e1 (— L] S{fl 3692 Kf)
S691 5693
5701 $702 5701 5692 5691 T Fn 5691 5697 S701 5702 5701 5702
5701 1 570) S701 5702
$711 5712 S711 571I S)11 5702 5701 m U) S711 5712 5711 5711 $711 5712 3711 3712 0
572I 5712
m CLUBHOUSE LN. J5751
= s721 s72: nu sn) CLUBHOUSE LN.
r 5731 5717 5711 1712 a, 71l S7]2 5711 5717 57111121 tJ
5731 5732 m
5751 5752 5711 5742, .r. '"■„
5751 5752 J.�O 5717 5711 37tl 5711 $712
3761 5767 5751 5752 5761 5767 5752 5731 3752 7 3137
$761 5767
5771 5772 5771 5772 5771 Pr,+j �1
re$•76✓7 3761 S76 r 576 1 53)7617
5771 ST)2
581 57825702 5702 sT' v 'A• 57 3777
57e1 5792 5791 $77 77l
3797 ✓ Q
5791 S79 7 5901 711seal 5802 2
P 5717
5e02 Se01 Se02 Q r ✓ 379L ',� ✓.+ u u u
SeOI Q se 11 Se l2 a 2Se12 5e11 5e12 .13 159215i)2 Fe, $001" �SsIeeeO
st NASSA
�sill
sea Snl 6 ■■ ■.+ o Nm w
LA ;a�
5e11 5912 (�
5190 D�5852 51 a'i N .�+ r a Q 1 r 'I V 5e31 U S 194 CA `•�j
sest Se62 Q r ✓ r v O LN. sell �siii a: 3 U
g w r Y " r �= •- sail m 5907 O D cosecl sn7 Y 1 o w w 0 5904 - � N od
sal FAIRWAY H 5861 m slot z
59e2 e92 r Q $901 D m"
5e91 P o " 5e92 .Q 991 7C N1 v �) 5e71 Z 5910
5901 5102 u L�S 912 n
5902 \p E R r L N. eat s9le m r a
$912 5921 S951N 911 5912 ✓CH P " = C � ,
5912 5912 m JBf —{0
5911 0 m
5957 5911 5972 5921 1 ` "' !
yy 5941
V pLe�i 5997 in99
957 H N Z
S962 1 5942 � 51 5951 funfi(Kr-7Vft" (n
S92I m S96 591 RETIE IIDECE5
5 Si2 S961Q
I
£
2S .
SPRINGDALE
HEIL
�, 3 o Y 16s01 g16552
. .
16502 c A '
16521 Q
N 16s71 LMEADOW I lbsa
16522 APTS. SEA BREEZE
16sst 'MOBILE ESTA ES
I 16552 16551
16556 16561
165" 16571 gb 165721(5152 HEIL (5200 - 16562 16561
SHPPIG 16576 16581 E5
16572 16511
W 16582 HEIL) 16592 16591
CNTR 16601 ¢ 16602
16602 .16611 16612 16601
e Si ai N iil
1662 STALLION S1'ALLICN CR.^
841MWL9 rune
16671 i6672 1667: 667: 1667!
166C. 16642 !6641 V1
N 6642 !66!1 N
1666I '6662 16661 6662 665 ONG
16671 6672 16671 16671
66T2 1667: _ 16TOQ +6p !6f 668' 166N1669: Ir,691 �.r�_rN
•7 r.6p� �6fA_ _
67:1 I = 116707 Q
_ � n
Q PcAN N N S
16t01
16751 t 16752 to a o 16751 j o u 168C2
u I 16811 2 6812 R
16761 16762 N N N �
16761 r V
16771 C 16771 ,�I 16821 i 16822
s 16TT2 16781 16871 = 16872
16761 671� 1 16841 O
n 16795 �
O y
1693M 168C2 16805 16801 g ,be eb e
16811 a n N w
l
- f
WAVHiIOEFtCR 5051 MEADOW cR
9 'r li
U ~
-------_----- -----
2
th ru F- Nc.NNN•� FLAGG LN.' •J
g NNNNNNNNN �� -AQ1Vi1NZA_�R'_.,
MEADOWLARK PLAZA o'
Z ¢' �� b14A70ND DR
sH��p' McDonald's 3Lwu
- _
o N Q C ' AtiA7E;CR.
O ' W
WARNER
166
WARNER
wAR EN R wwsa�ao�rRco�oos
17011 Q TIARA OTn0.�_ T
170
17032 K o H i n 170i2
�+ � rn IDfQ1CH1� "
17022 17041 f a I :P
Li
170d2 7 7052 � � ry 1—i
1
17051 17052 17061 17062 SPmr-
Y (17052 a '
17062 17071 17082 ,"„ 708 17062 GREEN)
17061 F 7072 17062
$22 m POINT SURFSIDE
17071 I707Z 17081 1709x e '
4612 17091 17092 17081 17106 CONDOS JAMES _ KING 7CR. 17111
4502 17101 17092 1710 4682 WARNER n n
17122 n e e n n 1712 R)oE
171 11' 1711" ' _
'1�a 17 332 „ 713 Q
ORION AVE. U
17122 � � � 17121 � e ^ e � 7111 CAMBRIDGE
171Z1 17122 ^ ^ !1
171z2. STELLRECHT CR. ' ' ' 715 711 APTS. S
171]1 17132 + HERMANSON 4812
o SQQ n 716 17122 (17171 BOLSA Q
17112 17312 17112 17311 R 3 17111 �B 17141
d 17162 17161 17152 17161 2J 17191 719^ f ,� 71t„ 7152 1'1'1 cn
J
17198
3 17172 17171 17172 17171 Dj = e = = CHICA O
W 720 . o
LLI 17182 17181 J 17182 17181 17200 ¢ 17192 17221 7x1 78 CURTIS CR. = co
W 17192 17191 17192 17191 in12
d 172n. 1 n n SEAPINE
z 172J1 7222 ,�9 e e e_ Z n n n d
t17202 W172O1 17202 17201 +' Z 1 ZJ2rZ 212 17238 17,11 2 r 1 OC17212,32
CITY OF HUNTIN(TON LOS PATOS AVE
I
. 1
m �
vc �
ti
I
_ I
I
175
BOLSA CHICA
P31 .
cocn D 5042 5021
0 p 5041
Of SOSS
SOS'
D 5062
;-1 ABALONE ALONE'LN' 4 1 50e2 soS2 .
5092 slot 5062
5092
S� 1 5102 51:1
� O 9 1 Sll2 .�
5112
p SI71 5U2
1 0',1 5122
11 SISI SII1
5142 n
E
& N
$162 N O
\ J N 5166 LEBLI! LN
J J J
E�fl
5200
BLUFFS�5152 1 5242 .- r .. m
5251 N G) s1s1 s2s: z GREENTREE LN.
5262 z r m r- '"
_ 5261 5262 175 S26' s236 f ~
14
r slat s182 Z D N G
5292 5281 325a OZ
1q� ` 5301 5291 5197 5291 s]97 f, r $ g F Y
b S� S]12 --I 5301 1101 NEWOUIST LN. sill ,^
5122 Slll S312 : � •. ,:l
C S•S'1,1 5311 S322 N N N N N N N N S Y
S]]2 5331 5]]2 '� „J, J J J J o 5742 r .
y'j1 5�41 5712 5341 S312 G c $ 0 SIIl .
o j5ti _ 5352 CAMELOT ~CR. S]32 0 s]st
y511 Z�S s762 5751 5152 J J J J 5362 D
= S5S2 5761 5762 u N N ��, w $ s 5172 Q
y1 y�9� \ 5372 5371
S� 2 S�y� 5171 5772 J r= " o 5782
�e G C 0 m o s]el
9 "'0v 5792 5]81 5792 " .. 5792 5191.
BELLPORS , PLEASANT CR.
S512 �,S ' S121 0 5401 5402 w ,", ~ =+ =+ o " ,.� J 3112 $411
2 2� 5121
w ll 6 H $ "' 5127 O
J 5421 5172 N .. N .- F- TT .
J J N
r 5172 SI]l 5I32 ~ `J' o Y $ w Q SI]1
•- •- 5441
V NLLGATE LN. 85152 ST ANDREWS ~LN.
`__l.1NN 5451
L 5472 o J
VWHbaJ -
8L1
8 311d1 S
(7
> ZOOO Ltpq
° 3 Z3NJ. D V1NVSy 9►LI zGILt Z '2JO VWOI 1NIOd
f►LT ►ILT Z►►GI m I►►LT ZIKt ►/Li MI D ^ �' ZS►LI 0 IS►LI Z►/LL r $ $ D
I►►Li LItLT D D L►►LS r zt►LS D .r.
ILr Z TZ►LI ZL►LF TL►LI LLfLT IZIGI iZILT CJ D C IDLE
D R►LI ZZ►LT n LZ►LS O LL►LI LHLS TC►LT LCILS ^ D
i►LT 0 ID►LT LD►LI Z TO►LT LO►LT TO►LT iO►Li y ID►LI ZO►LT O SO►LI LOILT TZILI u ZC►LT r 3 Tzt LZfll O TZIL
KI LLfLi i*1
OILI rTt O TO►LT w w Z y tj)LT ZT►41 Z TT►Lt
Z6CLT '� Z6CLT TLCLT i6CLT D i6CLT Z6CLI D i6CLT UUT T6CLt UUT HO Vd VN• 4! MLI D
16111
D 1BC17 ztCLT TBCLT ZBCL BOLT i6CLT "' i6CLT Z6CLT
ZKLT C7 n rout VS IaVW IBCLT `�q r0)!r ZKLi TBCLT ZBCLI TBCLT
Z1CL1 LBCLTLT TLCLT ZLCLT TLCLI uCLT ILCLT
r� L 9CLCLT 79rBLT T9LT MIT L9CLICLFZ TC 9L S9CLT
w w v Isul ?}O VWONOS TBCLT zsuT Tsui
i►CLT ZKLI r T►CLS Z►CCr I►CLT KLS ILL ►CLS T►CLr Z►CLT T►CLS
2dOu w VN3l13O aVW ucll ? lcur ttcc Rur �'+ ccct ICCLI ZCCLI L
p LCCLT CCLS TCCL
`CLI C TLCLT ZZCLi Cry TLCLT ZZCLT TLCLT r ` ZZCLT m ZCL ZCLT TBCLT ZZCLI TLCLT
i OtLi LTCLT Z ITCLT �C}� rr!!r ITCLi Tt CLL LtC`1 `r! t�� tr! OCLT
iDCLI ZDCLi OCLT
mca m TOELI f•f ZOCLI TCLI TEL DOLT TOOL
TKLI z6LL1 tidy �O ! IOCLI R"! ELT i6CLT Z6ZLI 6LLI
L6ZGi T6ZLI 67 T Z6ZGt T6ZLT 1� TBLLI BLLS r BZGI
pD 1 uainH3NId Z£ILI) °uT
uzl7 Y Z LZL iLZLI ' ZLLGI ?LLZLi Z1i ? LZLI
2!Q w VN3H1V t9zc1 ap OlIV OIVd
i w r tszLl �
— — —M Z lfcct
< t _ IrzLI ^ n $ $ o Z
G z w z u N Tuct 30Idd0'1S10 3
s " N8083384 100HOSMBIANv300 m 'a0 y iNOW3SOH
Q oui LaLLT Z DLLS zOZL D TotlT o C100H�S M31n �Z�tJ I) IC tOLLI zOZLI TOZG LOZLT �TOW r
m iOLLT LOZLT _
I6TLT Z6ILT n TLTLT Z61LI Z 6TLI L6Ili f TLCLT w M ZRLT CT1 m
r O Z N y y 16TLT Z6TLL O m 161L1
TLTLT LLTLI m ILILI LLIL2 LILT ZLILT ILTGT /t itlLt zLTLI Z SLTL ZLILT D ILTLI
TLTLT OI91LI Z9ILT = 9TLI !IO 3Nnr ~ ( s8nHWd OVZLI) i9TLI L9IGT C
T T910 L9ici S9TLT
SSILI ZSTLI p S(LT LS L TLTLT ZfTLi � m
SILT m n tSTLT zsTl rl! ZSTLI Z ISTLT
G Z r,� L►TLT r ►TLT Z►TL r i►TLT IZ►TLI
! ItTLT ►TL I►TL L►ILT t►iLT
FRCS L CTLT CTLT MEL TCILI MILE LCTLT TLTLT
ZCCLT I ILT r r TLTLT TLTLT
IZFLT Z IZTLI MILT TZTLI MILT � � $ $ ^ r TLTLT
iiiGi ICI STILT ITT LT - y Z
>! 1S_U:) MOGV3w poi �� orc m JO ~3lVOH3WWf1S rOa
_ `r r L60LT s 160L Z60ci S 60G1 L6OL r4
L60LI 160Lt LBOLT n iBOC ZBOGI O BOLT 10
< BBOL ~
(2�3NadM ZbZ9) TLOL
LT Z SLOG LLDLI TLOLS ZLOL V
r
yio -invd is N y°L� s �c �~ �c Lso[ 2 trots 38VnOS
1
Sldv v1NFiainv0 soli Tsol r tt sot zroc Trot 3 IVO 2GNaVM
oL $ 9 w w
v
ROLF ^
^ DLT $ -:n
.,. u ..JUM9
: or
2 "
83NHVM
H:DV39
W
A
-•°' < A-
Q .. ^ Q
ML It6L 106L z16C 196C t(6L SS 6L
Stu 916L it 6L ZCfG SC6( [L6L z16t I C{L 1►6
V IL S16L ZZIL TZ61 116L 116L )16L hf6l I16C 1r6L
ME
ZrGL IM ►16L C16L I16L LC 6L 116C YubL IM 116L
/O6L
101L tr6( 116L 1UL 1061 C06L SO-106t tOfL �I 6L 116L
t 16L 706L ML 1601 t61L 56-168C Z ML 106L iOiL t06L
L PIC 16IL Y 9LIL CI-i BIL 91-[IlL O 098E roAl
O 9L-ZLIL iLIL Q ILIL iLIL J ZLIL ILIL OU ILOL 169G 9UC 061E
ZLIL J 106-761L �- L9BL 1SlL O L9tL 191( Q C98L i8lL 1LIC `+t91
L1T91zcl9 LIi9T LSBL 7►IL = LOtL ISBL ZSIL IM 1991 121L LIIL
301S)4uvd tseC ►SOL I'll
W UJ W I I►et net IISL
W LIJ�� W 0 tfet U
uri0
�� z Q v) Y-C J p 119L ML 9 C IteL
WLtatW Y OCri`I p —1 rtr
uec tlac'
——z w C_7 Q °a-to x TOIL 0 Q ioei
Z M �'• -SILT U i6lL W X z6LL
[] CD J N = N O 10
W t0 ti W ILLf V ietc � 06LL
N_oOIL V C W ,J z = ucL
W J
> •=1 ISLL J TSLL LS LL
~VLL O �O V 1-1 PLI Q ou
ML Z =� Y N N K
»3A-11S -J
or w
� 'ZCLL f� d CCC(
W ZILL ;Z r Z d -- CTLL
Z. f OLL( = =Q OOL(0 Nl d3HS NUM c69L
W TV
L 1L9( 1L9( iL9G Z ' Z ML I(9L 0L89L 789E LB9L
Y yIL if9L Lt9C 199E J ^ -° J C99L 1199E CLfL•7LyL LL9CY O 0 Y �_.. -
199L T99C
9L 119t Y T59[ ZS 9L 'IS9L 3 LS9t 119C tSlLIiSlL Lf9L
1591
TM 119L 7C9( C91 I19L ti9L -_ L19L 1191 0 L►9L IC9L L/9L 11►lL [Nt
t19L'1/9L Q — J
Z 8I9L 119� U9 719L z19L T--' LC9L if9L LC9L i IL9L LC9L�11C9L CC9L
Y Y if9L 119L if9L
V 019( Z tt9L lt9L W ML ICU LL9(
L 791 il9( L19L Z19L SZ9l -- Z19L ii 9t _
9(9L Y _-1f 1L9L Z Q L79L li9L �- Li9L 109E 119L{119L Z79L
009L L C09L 109L C09L
! 119L = I09C 119E
-' .tISL 9L0
tO9G
{fSL Q„ 165E L6SL 16SL t6SL
L IISL 109L 6S( T09L
165L•t 6tL L6tC
' 1{SL v ZI SL W IMLLSL T[S( z Y 76BL tltl i6S " ' LBSL SBfI bSC i9SL Q tISL
Oft[ Iftt
Z 9SL Q Z9SL ilsL O L9 L ILs( LstG �/� l VIINV — - m zlsc
99t[ 0 �_ O tJ CLSL ILK
' 19SL W 1ft[ J CSSL ISSc Q IS SL 19SL t1st �v U --"`- '� Z9SL1
t tfL O Y o ^ N .e. z C9SL 19SL
L►SL IISL > L1SL 1►SL Q ZISC n 71s1 n - H Q =
N Y / z r J tsst
ttsL N-1 S3JNVJ TESL rst 3 Q use
to 1sY czSY 'Nl WIN 'N-1 3NOHH
EDINGER
(16060
BEACH) i1u
6052-16152 ��/� r sqA-
(BU . CNTFQ
16a1 166062 S4N 4 O0 (8400 EDINGER),
A �G6140 In THE HUNTINGTON APTS.
16101 0� O
Z 16102
(16160 16111 -' A
161y.
16121
BEACH) i
16163 6112 f tC�•�
(16168) 16161 16152
STARK AVE A16162 S
G VILLA YORBA APTS.
16172 - i61n (16000 VILLA YORBA)
m n A A
U 16191 16192 G Q
�. Z
W 16242 i6u1,LA P 7 DR. g
m
W
Z
CITY OF WESTMINSTER
0
G
F -
G
O•
HEIL
253
HEIL
^ S fl z
J "
i331 1653 165.71 16541 16562
!-2 MADDOX 16532g16581o
16562 ITS' 16581 1i56
16511 165i7 16561 16 Si1 16562 16351 1i 552
16562 n 16%1 165i2 16561 16562 MARS DR 16571 16571
16571 16572 16572 16371 16572 1657116581 16582
16582 16581 'J 16582 16581 16582
MADDDX Y 16602 16601 16601 16602
16611
1"12 166ll 16612 16611 16621 15611 16632
PRE-SCHOOL 166316 S
1"22 1"21 16622 16621 16632 16631 16632
A 1"31 Z 16632 16631 J 16651 E 16652 16651
A 166i1 -1 16642 16"1 r
16582 16651 16652
O
16651 16652 1"51 HUNT.BCH. 16661 16662 16662 1666I
A 16"1 16662 ADULT EDUCATION 16992 . 16692
16"1 •ATURN DR CC111(7 OI
A 166 16682 81 W 16681 J (PARK VIEW SCHOOL 16691 16742 16702
A 16691 ,� 16693 C
AI \l 9 ..
`,• 16691 1- SOC•
A 16701 i 16702 16)Ol = SEC.
fA
702 16721 m 16722 (16666 TUNSTALL) OFFICE
Elf 16722 16721
A n ^ 16762
fi712 167J 16732 167J1 EARL CA
Z NORMA DR.
QM1 .". 16752 16792 16)61 16752 �
-J LA MANCHA CR 6762
Q z 16791 16712
n 6791 J 6782
"<n r-< t _ 16792
16791 z 16792 16812
O _
< 16801 2 1680• ►RINCE DR^
Q
ry CORSICAN -� _�m DR o
MURDY COMMUNITY PARK 4n o r
0. C. F. C. D.
s - -
�v a ^ n 16882/16892/16912
e� ^ TOULOUSE DR.
�i
zA
LR $ON'9 rnS ~t� � JU A11666999551 22
n1 6931
16900 Ad
=QQX
16942/16932/16912
SHOPPING E16941
LK CR.
6932
697I
od
WARNER
261
HEIL
6if 6501 16502 650 6502 650 1650 16501 16502 1650 6502 16501 6502 16SO 6502 16501
16504 Z 1c Z Q � � Z 16512m16511
6510 16521 J 16522 652 (� 16522 1652 V 16522 16521 J 16522 16S21 V 1652 16521 () 16522 16521 l.) 1652 16521 -J 16522 1652
6532 16511 16532 6531 16532 16511 16532 16531 16532 16531 1657 165J1 16512 16531 16512 16531
1653 6511
cr
16541 16542 6541 Cr 16542 16541 16542 16541 165t2 165t1 W 16542 16541 165t2 165t1 (r) 165t2 165t1 1654 16541
\ 1655 W 16552 6551 W 16552 16551 J 16552 16551 a 16552 16551 Z 16552 16551
16556 F 16552 16551 f- 16552 16551 W a u 16552 6551
1656 16562 6561 r 16S62 16561 16562 16561 16562 16561 W 16%2 16561 — 16562 16561 16562 16561
Q _ c (, 16562 6561
1657 3 16572 657 a. 16572 16571 = 16572 16571 16572 1657f 3 16572 16571 16572 16571 = 16572 16571 6572 6571
tiyq~ BRUSH AVE
�, N N N N N° mm Pm o .ei rym mm
N Nrmrne Nn mmNeno n namNPPnmn
N
oNOmNom
1660 1660
16612 n
m m m m m m m m m m m mm^ NNmNPrya 16611661
16621662
BRYANT DR. 663 1661
t 166t
66-- fl
^ m mm 166 6
16672 16671667
6166
8 1666LAMBERT W VR
O 1669=
-
�L ry N ry N mN N m n m n n n
m m mm m m Z m m m m m m m m m m m m'. .. .. m .. .� m
16702
16701
167J2
o 1672 1672
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
uj TERRY m m I 167321673
6Y U
N N N N N N N N N U A 67
167t16711 16742116741 n Z 16742 16741 Z 1674 6741 w 67t 16741
2 16751
1674
Z m m m mm mmm 167521675 1
1675 J 5167t2 16751 16752 751 6 656751 6
J2 Q
16771 � 16772 16771 b Ir 1L 6�S 16762 16761
16772 16771 1677 ti 16772 16771
16772 tJ W 16772 16771 Q Z 677 1Y ?16761 m 16772 1677
16781 n 16782 16781 16782 167a 678 16�e a0 6�e 16791 J 16782 16781 678 ,6��ti 6j)1 1677 16792
O 16792 16791 _ 1679
16800 O Q 16792 _1 1679 16791 to 16792 16791 16782 16791
1" 3 6791 ', . F- 16792 16801 L6.W
y I 16802 1680 UJ
16802 16801 F V r ^ O Q 6802 16801 681 Z
1680216801 H m m
Q 16822 b�'L~ W N y 6802 16821 6B 61 lJJm m m 16812 1681
1683 1~� LA NmC ASa TE R: DR.
a 7 ti ,~� N A RNEmT Ta DR.
o N 6Be eJ
168 1694216866
m m ^m m m m m m m m m m m
O. C. F. C. D.
16862 16861 `S"UM 16861
1686
16871 A ? 1686116881
16892 16891 GOLDEMNEST A 16891
16902 CHURCH OF CHRIST A6891 =
16911 qm m qm qm 16911
16 21691 16912 A TAM AR U
16 t 2 RANCHO VIEW SCHOOL) 16921 DR.
16 2 16932 A D a n n r
16 8 16912 6931 A m m
6 016951 (16940 B ST.) 16951 Z ..
6 2 Ar
69 �� � 0 16971 � q q q <
m
WARNER
263
WARNER
HOME DEPOT V1 ^17031 h
17032
1705x 17052
OCEANVIEW CAIN AVE'
HIGH SCHOOL 17062. 1706S 170"
(17071 GOTHARD) 17072
170t2
17of1 W
J
Q
17122 17121 0
17132
J
a
171M
17162
(17200 GOLDENWEST) oCEDAR AVE
17202
7 - 7422
U J
' 7452
� a
s g s a
J ^ ^
BETTY I
r ^ ^ DR BEACHVIEW TRAILER PARK 17161
'` ♦ .. ti r Jr r h^
17332
17212 cr Q.
17302 173U U 17312 17311 U 17312 173U U 177
17321 17322 17321 17322 17321
17122 3
17331 17332 17331 17332 17331 Z 173
7.2
17332 17341 t73-42 1n 1 W 1nu u341 Q 17342
CITY YARD
17342 17351 17352 173s1 J 1735x 173s 17
FORD DR 17362 17411
0 0 ^�^ 17372 7442
7
o 0 0 ^ fie~ 0 7462
n n 17392 17441 a: 17472
744 ►6 U 4M
NIMROD pR- vu vu1 ^� SUNBREE^E^DR. ^ Ur' >17�:2 3C 7
17451 174S2 17451 0 17452 $ 0 17452 17451 WF---
74s1 7452 17451 4n 74 1743x d 17492
/c1 7462 17181 J 171G2 17462 Tut 17J62 N17Y6 17431 17471 Q
W 17461 p 7461 Q747 17471 '� Y V 1747 17452
Q 7172 17G72 0 17472 17471 7471 r 7172 1 TJ L
749 74s2tn 7l� LA J 74f 174f1 AlMTER r 7491 h n4fx 7n 17491
SLATER
271
WARNER
^ ^ ^ n J G 17011
I-
H FIR DR. 17011 GUARDIAN CENTER
17042 17041 ^ g e
9 "
17052 17051
SY AMORE AVE
170n 17071
17101 17102 70 17D91
17092 17081
17102
17
17092 17091 ^^ 17081 100 :;092 17071
J 17102 17101 17 W F
Q 17102 17101 17308 y
BELSITO DR. W 17122 17121 17111 17121 17116 17111
— 17 =
17121 y� 17122
1 17132 17171 17131 17917-17951
RAINBOW 17142 17141 CYPRESS AVE
PARK PRESS AV �14 I7140 715
nn/ez ^ 17162 A.e.c.
"• 17162 17171 17212 17151 n177 17171
17211 —
17182 17181 1n32 17171 17190 17191
17192 17191
17181
1T212 17201 h 17242 17191 2 17192 17ll
17212 17231 17Z32 17205 W 17IJ2 17221 m
lnll 1 T2 2 17271
V
ti t262 17251
OAK VIEW SCHOOL ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 172'2
p1726E MANDRELL OR 72 17n_ 17281
17281 ^1T2 17292
l'21II V 17291 (17)O1
17J11 z (17241 OAK) 17311 ' _ Sohe,�„D„• 1000 BEAC )
17121 17331
1Tw1 lt3oo
17331 BARTON DR.
17341
E 17300.OI
17771N17372 ^ ^ 17361
17331 17361 173G 17361 m 17362 17361 17362 17762 _
17J81 0 17J71
17:71 173T 17771 p 171n 17]71 17J72 17372
17401 1-n91 17381
17381 173R 17381 173-2 17381 17332 17302
17»1 1778:
17/21 114ll 17»1 17» 17401 17432 17»1 17»2 17792
17401 Z 1739,
17421 774U ? 172E 174ll 17412 17411 17412 17411 J 17412
17151WA N17432
?
�17
_ Z 721 174U 174.
3
1t2 Z
I1744 J174 1 171J2 1T471
Z 76
, N7 J
5
�17"l 17!6 D17 17142 17!1 OpKy
T 44
471E7472
o J w 7451 SUBS� y � i17483
461 uf
ta � o W
SLATER
272
aMV1M3N M
2 its k R ug S IL►e p LL►e LIS LLII LIe C►s TL/I It
K tfle cr
IftS ots U
n►1 9►/ Q LS►e TL►1 O N
rNtmT1►eow Isis[t►o ton tits lit# UtoTits •N »3O13Z
7 3NA0 NVA ti►s Tilt LL►s tL//► titsT1/1 Lils". Q Otits 16Ce W [° b ° toteroll LO/sts IIto SCI LEI Tin to [BIB me tote
nC/ TeC1 Qtovm
TITS 21Ci 1/n ,E J to W
a w a O :ue ILI$ un 0
UtS LICI 9C W L9Ce ifn CC CL L9C1 W ir
L9Cl i9Co
uc1 Nl L6o Isle tsa >
t►cis ^ i $ n 1 n n R r►Te 1►[s t►Ce Y h
Isis
tits ~ tin iCC1 LCCA J
7 7ry� ry7 r P e �.
• iris QO f F s S n n n n n n ttt/ ttte Till
tillTTII �l N3dWV rTi/ nto
tot° -JW
N a s M ^ a Me To($ Tits : r ran Tin N NOSd3dd3('o "7 v r, w BLI IsisQ LCie g � � � � � � � � � R r[n ute ILL/ rite un IIn ute
W N1 WVON311OH Q
Z 1911 19ze i92B 19Le
LIZs Sri LSL1 $ n
Isle Isle LSre TSie
Zito tit role i1Le tote Tote ~� r �..-
3 TITS n ? 7 R e en Q rote lC ii 4
F� tit$ ICZo LCie iCLB
o n o o 0 1 tote iris ,^. •^., "�',
iris ~N'1 VNOl3OHV8 tin uu tin l:ze Ltte �j• � U7
1618 tote t0ts tote ZOLo tote
lots zot° lots Cr IOZe lots Q Ioio ti
" I Q LOTS 1610 (n t61e 1610 •a,7 .. a33W
n 9 n n ^ � 1 1° C611 161e We 1611 L TBtI Q L611 riot
�--�~'-----' Zell leis W tell Isis
---------------' ell Tell tell 1SIS J Q roil
1910 TITS CQ LLt1 ILt1 LLIs ILI/
191 [!Te 16/►COLT Ills 911 T911 r9is 191e Isis i9T/ W J 7911 ^ n n
iSi1 S11 isle isle Zits
Isle tI /6/OLOLt LIIs I/te tI. R (7 n Isla
tt isle t►n lit Isis toil I►n [Tie*1-67Nl ~N3N2lVW
ttu c 6o[t TITS Ise ttu J utl tin Q o
LC 11 � Rtoot s !1/99OLI Li° TITS -J Cris Tits U ti ,^,
9 "To 18/21oL1 n
no tt I N [tit me W LTT". Q ~ ~
Zll9 _
ion lot/ ¢ tou tat° J toot J lt9 LLIc O_
Q Q twe � J laic ow tot°
R C n o S L60S T60o 2601 1606 L 0:
M n �� O �. 1809 Z809 11109 m
Nl VOVNVHD
�- Z2t90o9c
ocz 0a t z009 Oloe DILo9 a ZLG9 troc
too, q9 1909CID N,0Oe Z
Q Z909
O 1
- n n 9 t eo� oD. O. 00
HOV39
SLATER
AVE
17511 17S12 1
NTINOTON
t
17571 17S3I ^ J VILLA NU
_ ^ � ^ MOBILE CASTLES
17575
= 17ssl 7930
757
s 17572
O
7S91 tt111T014 Z
17602 Q
760 760 ^
O
762 7622
17661 r
SPEER
AVE
766 6
17661 17t+1 J Z622172 J 17
RE J17572 17645
17637 0-
1769 W
n
70 17642 17661
17641 17692 r ^ 1 Ol n 17652
~� n r r 17671
m 1766 17691
17701 : lno] a LIBERTY AVE
OS/O9 J 17705 cr
t T6f2 "
CZ 17707 U
17731 ► 17709 ^ o m n�` gl r 17701
17721
• r m
17751 177ll TJa n .. 1773I
-�- r 17761 Q
NEWMAN AVE LU
17771
17901 �OODMIND D e
17911 ^
17917 17782 rP ro
17921 17711 17791 r
17931 r 17802 171111
17916 17111
17661 j 17812 17a11 17822 RONALD DR
17861 I9 17912 17931 I 17931
17952 17942
17I91 : 17a51 = 179]]
17892 176S1 a 17935
a
17991 X,17962 17861 ; 17a62 17977
17971 ; O 17991 17992 17971 17941
1790 0 0 C 17182 1R962
17,11 17992 17391 O cr 17945
17911 21 Y 17902 17901 V 17902 17991 V 17972 17847
17901 i O 17911 17912 17151
A17922 �o17911 17912 (7811 17991 17992
17f21 ^ 17921 17922 TALBERT 17992 17955
Wm0FIELD 179)2 17a61 179f2 OCEANAIRE 9] 17902 17961
3 1T751 17952 APTS.17961 1791260LI17971 17972 .Ip/UiCH ,. JO Q^ 17991 m 17992 ^ '7991 17 61
•
TALBERT
282
aNVf1M3N
a c a LBIB
W
w � y Z Q ` U4 r y Li L917
Sp 0 LBC(1 F.•. l.._.• LSIB
LLp $ ,( ll U�Y�NJNV►1: is L►►e
a (n n n n �fr Nl;tii��1(J LC16
< 'NI 3NNVX08 m J opt q ZL/B
19te W u<;f. < 111E
v -I ANVtllaOR
X.
-� ma'n
Z '^ t7tB
ZBCB U � 6CB ILC7
O TsEI r• n n n ea•
N� 3NIOI"39 Cc 1-1 rr'11r 3 3
G w
yI l►[Y TIED •N- ~IS3a03 s►T
lite ttte Iz[e 5 U
Z7E0 ilCl TIED a— U _
Mo ; 1010' tote 16Le L11 111s LTCD TTCe
0: 16p 716p
' Late �lote Coto Tote '- IBID
tots tots �7
~ NOSaIJ-43r A ZLZ9 TLt V TM F—
$Z x '^ 19Lo Ma flito L9p I9L8 ZZ 9Z8 l9Zs w
Zito^. .. ^ ^ '
^' S tsto ISZa-
] m
19Ls
19Le I►Lo tlio 1►Ze S2o ZSLo ►LB J
_ _ Ise nu Q
Zip) 19SL1 1LSCI is LCp 109L1
"" 9LSLI lite lipy t09Li
U i Zip 09SL1 ►is,t 909"
yq�
L7t1 KSCi LLS[I IIL1 LILe 'I09L1 n r^ /L9LT IZZe
4 K Sit OLSL —�"•7Z9L1 MET 169L1 a
J, tote lots COio ZCfL( Zo9LT 161L1
ZSSLI 19SL1 I17LT r$ 9B9LT 90CL1
1611 OSSLT 99SL1 t61/ L6iD ► ET ^ 069L1 CULT lots
IS b�
Till iL11 V ILICALTs 41 ILTo v al n $ •..,i,� iLiC d w
If TO
1 1 Q LSio TSi1 LSiD .r .. .n� .� ,^y �.T9T0 Ow
ZCi[ i[T a0 I[Te�III (To ;_tS9Ll ILUT- �Q9j COLLi ZLLCI =Z LIJ
=
—ua olod�o =w a
;Zit LIJ
TL11 ' Z719 iitl tiro 1►9L1 199Lt, i T19LI MOLLY IiL LT .. U V Y
w J N
I118 O]
ZTIC Z 0
901 1019 Q 0 0 I 8
LOi
9E0. Q S
970 _ ^ ^, I D f-Z'
LCOP
" A Z Q
'1S N083WV3 z J 00_
m M Q
N ►o
r
NOb38 .
fl: ssol Q
v6►0I10 p W
U 3
L1 m �
cc a i LL fL
Y31'.
co C Z lea. m9n Yxwr ---�ZDGLNl
Z �x tt6L IM
u' t9IL 191L
`' SfIL o t1I
•' '•' ry C TNL
:e�� : iIIL � � � � R � � n
g [� = ; " e O CCIL iCIL
Mc
tnt g ISIL LSIL 'NI IIWYVVd tLIL ItIL
s►I -9►IL a' .f►IL
CIiOMYM T9I[ �LiOL -� r Lau4 Z [TIL T7IL
CIL L r ,. k "Ig k i fit
Y tou toll
1'JI StIL 1 9LIL A11I�M ,"a '� „ �ER
QTELL
TtIL tLlc TLILI �LLIL F R SIIL IIC 9TIL .. ILL
I �iwr „L T»L �tn4 1S 3MnILLL
- - � (n
W 8 1( ` J TDILI �•Pt )C)L7Y LLLL 111G 7 b O . a 19LL
OO rj1YY� �e •a J Ot �tolc � m b s : : '"
W� 61L- •• o o •• 96LL 29LL 19LL
--_• �� L6(L
W " ULL ItLL N1u b b e d i uu
Miieiiuri tL ILLL 801/hr
LiL[ 7iLl ZILC IICL b b LOLL itt
LiLL 7TLL LOLC i0tt t0LL IOCL O tOLL 'ILL
ML
CC L69L
• �' LOLL IOU L69L L69L L69L 169L 169L 0 TOLL
CIL t[LL LCLL L69L
T I9L L69L 769G LI9C SI9C ZL9L IM TI9L
LLfL
1111 IC9L IM IM U IM ["L
0D9[ Lt Z99L T99C L99L i99L m t99C I99L t97L T99L L19L IM
L59L iS9L LS9L IS9L W LS9C IM W tS9L TSIL 0 Ish
iZ9L Lf
I[9C iC9C tC9L IC9L 0 LC9L IC9L a) iClL TOIL LC9L 1C9L
L---- -- ~ LZ9L iL9C ZLCIMLL9C iL9L Q tilt
LL9LIM =
w)lWd 9 T
'-""- -
NOlJNllNnm —
ILiItTI i S
nu
109L YIrm Z09C 109C Q Z09L TD9C L091 "
I'- L6tL ry O C09L
n [6SL 76SC OZ C65L 16S " o '�" = 7 tISL
0
1O i95L Lost LSL
test rest test b 3dSVJ
1 . "OON003d - USL use tl nY L9SL
LSSC LKC 195L LSL LLSC e $
y L9SL 7 -� -� LSSL
Y � sl d 9SC .1 o n "n �" n CJ"n itt
19SL FZ- LKL ? Q
ieVNavZ) tl
Litt n R, R :3 M i c ['
s a
TALBERT
►- 1,00 , Z g 1t001
W
1a032
W 1eon .J 10011
• • • •
1a0/2
1a052 N 1tO12 1 • 11021
LwmA MWo loon
Q
lau�a t061 GLAOYS AVE 1ws2 imi CR. 1aoa1
11 G CREST VIEW SCHOOL 18071 ~
1t062
W laos 1a061
1eo62 W 1a07x 1"71 1 8071
1eoi± 1eo91 ¢
►- 11092 .. la0fi'1 W SANTANA CA. 8-1
18101 N
1.Oe0 (18052 LISA) 18102 •_ 181021e" t09t
lout
tao90 1a112 11112 � 13112 1e10 O slot
1e122 _ 10122 i;MA►LE DROVE cY
S S c 1e132 <
STERLING g AVENUE 1813: `• ' '--•
le1Q
1e152 1a151 �- 111S2 1a151 W 1a152 1a151 LaLSi -•k
u GRIN
18172 16171 N 11172 lalal •� • • • = 1a1a3 1e171 1e161 isle • �1 F Cyr •'_:
1.un lol7l tetra Z C late �r
lala2 191a1 QQ 1a1a2 \ O 1e112
1a191 1a171 1e17s 1m75 11172 1e1e1 121e2 lelal 111e2 A
Cr 12182 !
11202 W 12202 y 1a191
n 1a191 Q 9 �j1 '.
1e1 J o 1e202 = 1e192 °e 51iAMRtCR
U 18212 C7 le2u a 16211 ga lel ; 18212iszn CR
1e212 ^ ., ETw�TER CR.
W =1e2U KINER AVENUE 1e221 KINER AVE.
10222 '
m W 1e212 1e232 _ _ e 1e232 ;•i.-__•••bLfr1,0 1d:1:
m 0
8 *` j!t = 1a2a2 — ry ry r 1e2a2 1 �' Z
• e itu2 • lust 1 sur+eEa�cs - J
TAT LOR 11262 1•.•• - .
DR. LE CONT[ DR.
,,, U271 1e27 1e271 V 1e272 11171 1eM] Z 197e2 U2e1 ' -•--•--
„ 1am M J 1e2e2 LLJ
m o : laiel < tags 1e211 1e212 1e281 a 1e29 1e292 1e291 1e292 i Z
a 19222 4r' .t
12302 • • 1e301 1e302 1e 30 0 83021830 e302 1a702 1e301 ;•
x too 1e301 Q 13302 0 19302: ., P
e7 ~ 10312 39]]1 Iol1S':
3 u a el lelu N tely 04NCY CR .�1-........ °. e
lea r- 1e312 e721 Itl J . 10322 19321 1e322 r'..:c•..... .. QQ) ^?
N 1e111 la 1a321 1e121 m �. — _ �+
g 1e131 le]]2 mlr Z 19312 1e341 2 193a712t','�'LAMBERT
5
pA 1a331 Io311 • 193a1 C �.
gp988 0 _ _ Cr 1a3s2 1e3s = a3;2:31• PARK
915 lalsl 1e3+2 1e351 19352,m�m N
• FD ELLE • « nP 19362 1e361 to 36• ...�
1e361
1e371 1e172 RF 7iyy I//,
lit te372 LARkSTDPE! _
lelei ten: ta 3e1 1e3e2 HUNTINGTON i LA CUESTA "f_1 R.
m.l_
1a393 .—lelfl ''
IsmJ rn �•_ y�,,VIEWPOINT '
1e401 s11 : taaat Z law2 OAKSTONEJ,•• I
m 18421 18422 '
lel hall LA PALMA AVE 1N31 laali cc d �• -w• f�
late z O 1t442 i< BASH
CR
- teat a ,Y -�,
1846 - r esa 1Qi2O - CR. I BLUFF ;z l CFt. .O -ELLIS
ELLIS
25�3
ELLIS
L501
HUNTINGTON CREEK 11sO1
H FIVE POINTS
CONDOS
W SHOPPING CENTER
t1111 CREEKVifW Ir
<; 12543
J
W 31512
11519
�i
1
PARK►ORUT r+
11600
I �
u
AMBERLEAF CR
0
rR
a
11652
PARK CREST I I I I I I I I I I 18662
19s61
lecn
VILLAO!COURT /
PARK DAY COHO"
P 18732
P G 11700 19765 127U
5� L Q.
MFIE D MEDICAL TOWE[l HWo ,j Q m0 1.751
197121t700 w1cLI►oAROlHs O igloosao
�ruK rATH 1e1u LL
/ I / ►ACI►CA MOR MTK
12712 1BB19 � 1t 792 1tt01
W
COKV. HOSPITAL
1/ Igloo Jaj ltlu 11tss
✓ igloo yW legz
itus
11e21 12251 _-
�`I r • 111t1
In
p MONTE 1 SHAFFER
► CRISTO4N.�
ltttl
0�
M 11942 12911
1/992
= 1g921
CIO 7661 11962 12"1
7711
11911 11971
GARFIELD
412
_ ELLIS
0
lesoz
18510 13540 18531 19532. 11i
1851 TOWN 1851x 18511 1852 i MlIITvIaTON
18516_ les+1 lessl les5i
1e518 185+6 - CHURCH I WYA-OINT �r LOS AMIGOS
COUNTRY 19518 18571 18572 I �!; OpNOw
t6szo — Iris, O MOBILEH01.1E PARK
18s21 550 local 1 1.
1 88582
18552 - 18602 I - 18601
taste � ._ 1e6L1 _ _
1853+ 18611 18612 I --------
EAC
_a?— I8631 18622 -
1861 186+2 ,18631 186J3•
18652 Z �• 'C
1 e6J3- 18651 186+1 18642.1
61 18662 18653 II PARR
18682 186 1867219651 , TOl"HoM 2EE3
10671
18692 13e671 18672 O, ''O
186 J1 O, •'O
m $ Q 10702 q18711
18692'i d w�. ''w
Z I A D IO DR. m 18712 1a7ox = a' i <
G R Q' -J 19723 19712.L— U Q �<`li7oo m 1B7Ji 18722�Q CATHEDRAL ��°j�CLWOOC DR
LU 187+1 18742 `'� POINT .�E L�I'N000 LN
18711
m 18751 187-12 - -- �� ZQ
-L�NOENWVOU oa��_ tMODAL' f?R
J
1 v71p Y.. 7LLrowooco-. 0-• 6A.4i+000 Ia76i lA)s2 187G
I8751 18776 cl CHE o IB771
187SR _ _1.8771 CONDOS z CHERRVW 0 B� 1677 877
LLI
_ ; 00
!- THORMYOpO .CP J 18791 781 '
18792 _ _ _ - CRa` .. 18762
O 1880i
m 51i Kwo00 pi = '�NETTLEWOO 1879 m m m o
- 18731 18782 SPRINGmI
U CONSTANTINE DR 1eaz2 teeo YJ, ISC12
18832 18801 18792 1981 i76 a822
om m O 1 ^' 18842 Z�mm 1892 v .84'_ .. 1
.^^
18822 18811 W o m I F�fftXTDN /� 1e852 18821 �' m tt] ' o
5t 1ae1z 1ee1 AURA 884 m SIJfWCI
AM. 1e819
18851 .l 18052 I 18851 18811 f a85 1
18861 18862 I I B!� m 8871 018802
L8962I 118>11 IL0L1 - -1. - .- 18861 n
18882 :Z}886 Z 1886218861 8962 1888 tee9-
1e886 —
I a I- 1=92 iJ2888 J 1888218881 8882 18832 1891 8"2
19922 1e898 139n1 18901 I Z - _ — 18912
18903 1 11889 } 1889218891 8892 C1f UACH
1t906 13911 a; I0912 1 J - -- B91 18921 ^ 18422
092
18900 IL911 U I1711 1890 090218901 890Z 18921 1e9J1 189]2D 1" 21is 12 _
1 e916 1 }99i Q 891288911 19912 18932 O J8911
i-9]1 w I.:9.S: .— 10911 to
41NE � IN912 18911 1e942
11751 Q IL952 t961,y�m IB933 16951 IR952 16952
7.961 > 109eI
' 1. Lj 189+2 ¢ U 17962 1e951
18911' � F• — O �'2
1.191,
2
C` 18952 11971
1897_ _ ¢ 0972 186
1a97 IGL91 9 RFIE D19ALef:
GARFIELD
413
BEACH
zz S w s
lose
e075 107 cf)
�
t1913s I Ff 12 19115 910s' 1 Los!D
toll" �� i]fACHCRf9T LN. _
1912 19110 VISTAZ ,
0
v. i L L � � v y o m � a � : ��' ° � r� .. Bllo [i•- —n o10 lls 0WORCHESTER ♦ rrru 1pr Fo oIN Y ' O
e12: u2t et2x ~LANE B17t e122 120 Z
~ '
1121 8122 0 e121 f17 u N w1 pl7s
ellx (O� 8131 e132 sell ell2 el)1 I _�UE1f N*P0Ny LN. -'
�•ti cn
0A i 1162 � Y '�° e 7 e1u e162 e16x � et)ol �'
e X r °r°r D WEYMOUTH u c eul ets2 a elsl ets2 " elsl
~ ~ LANE~ ~ z
r pp
• e19x o � e n � 9171 e172 2 = 8161 RtsR R759 else
.. 6 e172 et7t et7 .-
0222 b`� or N = slat 7 e16o a COLCHESTER LN ..
e1e alex
1211 Lb'♦ o raI 1 1 e! 8191 e192 7 Rle] .- 8161 _ g e161 U182 0161
-< ' ya♦ or p19 oye °ryr 82092 Bx01 e2C2 N .~- e163 N ' ej61 1192 f 1163
l7u .- s'�1 Yet'1' �.+� ,�'1' •,., 1ti/ e272 b�/ SHEREIORNE LN e163 m °J61 8203 8165
1212
8261 jar e1.1°1V1 e1• °7%\., ♦p,82/2 .- y°j/�b N e w n Iyr °�°J .l1 °163 b e167
711 e2s2 r et 8351 DCAPITOL '� N Jt� { 1169 1222 1161
O e251 e75 C< r '-- yCR8251.e2s2 = B451 — ��b 8171 I/° rDD g ~g 2XS
�m
8261 1262 8261 362 D - 0262
8261 8182 mstetZ sin 8372 "9272 0
e271 272 8271 e192 a
;0 — 8282 0191 8192 ;e7e1 1782 --
e281 e202 8281r r y fly m 8302 e2ot 2
8291 8292 e291 BI92 8291 8193 102 = .Zu f e2o2 1201=
ex91 CONGRESS CR D 8222 m e22, 8222 0221 \
8301 e)02 e301ie)02 8301 8302 8J02 y
eloll o r .+ 0232 623113212 r e231
8321 8322 n e)21 8322 17 8321 8722 () 8.122 O •Nri c v
-- Uzi, �' z 2 e212 0261 e262 m e211 Ax e])1 8332 Btu 8]]7 9]]1i 8332 e)J1)9312 _ 8 e2s2 8251 e2s2 A east 75
HARDING J LN r' e26 SUMMERFIELD LN.
' �, ..' � � ou r �',, e761 �j� .t1ti .!✓ e162 � .q, l, g g
.�J z ♦ Al P^ rYr r�
yNEW~HAVEN~ I en1 —' r
~ L N 83e2 n1 stet
- - - 8191 1197 8391 8392 e�9t 0 11 r 'r LN
.
- G7 B)9l 1 eJ92 � e191 �
O Btgt et9 'y •tit u92 z e39t sr
8601 1102 BIOI 9602 D 9601 �% .. u p 601 9 ♦ e6o2 n e601 8401 $ r g
Z w� ti sot e z e6o2 n� �-
O 8621 e632 C 9621 r :N 4 e tit
u ��F r
8121 lug
C 1 N
t7 e631 I 9612 e631 �: i "� I'.1: �4 eA1 ♦ yb� rq,'t'°1 g .
8631 1632 -( r 0 skit y ,o " �- ✓ `b r r
uu 86 el C BF rM rib r ~
e/61 e662 C.) 1/61 lug2 n ETHEL CRl661u 1,34
`y" V C S
eul �
e671 1172 8671 8672 9671 L•�bt 4 A ;q "�+' " M .- ,. �p `�1t �� x ,
NEWLAND
BEACH
17
SEVEN SEA' r ° " day m °° C /16 A u1 10s2
» » "� �•
N r
G c e o• `y y �-L oO�, o c C r IStI o0at
°j ;. 2a116xm9 i72 �" » use oot
9091 °�, o 0 0
1101
u r S 1E11L►DINT
— — SOMERVILLE rLN
1111 Bi1!
1121 1122 1121
0121 I'll uvosown716 .
1U1 1171 LLiI 111, list N04
M3 c
`— 11 a1 91a2 / 41 y �*
9141 1111 m
/151 Bi5! 1151 L7 D t
YVONNE LN 0
9171 IL72 0171 Z O 6 a�5
all, 1172 —— --- go ♦ ,� '
Bill I112 1191 y m
Z 0181 1162 TIDE►OOL m 1EAlAp00 LN �()� cgP
/191 0192 9191
O_ Bi91 Ritz --
1211 /212 Bill �^
1211 uu
LLL —_ LONDONDERRY LN
D 1:00 1212 1211 1112 1211 'A
O $241 111: ; 1:11 Ritz C Bitl » « « « » « » (n
D -- 2 1262 w ,o. alb /262 o w w w o 0 0 »o 0 0 0 0
8251 825: r ust us: 1^ C G 5 8 8 R S 8
1271 r 2029 9272 r r r r r r r r �, r r r r r r i• N r
/291 1262 -< 1241 9262 A 1261 Bill SEA 20=' v SOUTH NEW BRITAIN LN NORTH NEW BRITAIN LN
1271 9272 p 1271 $272 p 1271 u w .'° 12/! P
,Bi0_1 1A 70 8102 =y tu92 O �1u211
r
$2011291 2: 2 1791 1292 . 13021711
9I01 9101 9102 1 '
y Y v 20291 9712
1121 1722 112, 8322 m BEAM
KILKENNY LN, — 10 » 2029 CgpE COTTAGE LN nit
11a1 6Ja2 Bial Bi12 Bill 1312 O u » » » « « —
A �O�°j o o M « » » 9111
1112 —. e°r 0 0 0 o q ppt8341
pp pp 1113 -97
51 $ 52 6751 8751 1151 "1 o .D C r "� G G C 5 M MM R 0 Bitl
161 9162 061 0162 O •o' D A — — —' — .�
Bit! .-- .__ A �"' >a o o » o 0000 " Bifl
-- 9771 1177 Bi71 HARPOON r r r r r r rr r O 1171
1,1 U 72
Bill 9112 Bill u12 Bi11 PORT GREENWICH LN Bill
Bill Bill --- o fl
Bi91 1792 N12
J1111,2 9791 uol, .°. tits Bi12 .0 11R11192 Bi91 am ; $111 976! 1111 Bi1t6791 97t2 l ! « N o71u02m I101 9t02 140L 1a02 r9t01 B402 O 1401 1602A9t01
BiO ol 9101 .o 1101 lot SEASHELL Z — Z O 9u1 m Bill
lt7 9t1! Bt21 6a22 9421 9t2t W " w r 024 1111 fall 0O Rill 1a17 A 1111 9412 = Bill 9412
°lj t122 1121 taxi T Bi21 I122 p Rill 11l2 y 11l1 1122 1U1
u DUBLIN LN 6Bi1 Bill " r C O O D
Bi11 6 0 » 6/11 Bial 1a1t 'Vol"
'Vol 1432 70 1411 9672 BIt x Ball Bi12 n Ml Bi12 1411 9412 1t1
Btt2 91t1 1
0 0 0
BIIl 1112 p 1 9at2 p 1 I 1111 _
6a51 « » » » « LIGHTHOUSE Bi1 p 1t1 111! 70 1ts1_^ » » » o» •, 024 1652 70 1151 Its! 70 9451 fay! 9a51 115x 1451 Its!
0 0 o a o = 0 1,
ril 1t7! l/il /t7x 1171 9171 6t,1 9Bi! 1171 tali 171
�"' NEWLAND
MAGNOLIA
9001 900 9001 9002 y�2 900 9007 9ml 9002 900
G C CJ' m
9077 KIOWA m 9021 902 9021 Yuji 9021 9022 9021 9022 9021 9021 902
Sou m .,� LN.�,, 90]l 90)2 2 90]1 90): p 901 9031 9032 p 9031 9032 m 903
9oS2 I-' g D D u D CO 9051 9012 p0 9041 9012 fC71 9041 9042 CD l0/1 l012 1 901
9062 p2 9061 90u D 9061 9067 D 9061N 9062 C 9061N 9062 D 9061 906I 9061 9062 n f- -61,9062 m 9061 9062 D 904
D 9071 9077 D 90T1 9071 r0 9081 90e7 E 90e1 9087 9081�9072 D 9071 907I 17 9071 f072 9071 9077 907 .
90e2 _
9092 90e1�9012 9081 9082 9091 9097 9091 9091 9091 9087 90e1 9087 n n go 9082 C'1 90e1 90e2 908
9IO2 9091 9092 9091 9092 9101 9102 9101 9102 9101 9092 9091 9092 9091 9097 9091 9092 9091 f0l2 909 '
9117
9101 9102 9101 9102 9111 9112 9111 9112 9LL1 mu POLY NESIA N
9117 fLLl 9LL7 9111 9112 9121 9122 9121 9127 9121 911I a r 9 w Iw " $ 9112 911
9121 9122 9121 9122 9t3t 9132 9131 91)7 91311 9132
,V., r r wNIGC 911
WOOD L TEAK fl]79111 9119111 9111 9112 9111
91]
91/2 9151 9151 913 9152 9151 9152 915, 9157 9151 9152 BAH AMA ~ L N 9111 91/7 911
9157 9161J914 916 9162 9161 9167 9161 9167 9161 9162 .. ^' ' 9161 9162 9169172 9171 917 9177 O9171 9172 9171 9172 O9171 9182O $ w w $ w 9171 91729179187 � 9191 ' 919 9192 9191 9197 9191 9191 9191 9t92 c $ 91e1 9IeI fiel
917 KANEOHE �N' 9191
9202 Ou. �.
N N N ~I J T �
03
D 0. C. F. C. D. _
Z w
G7 D � Dm 9772 IMPALA~ ~ LN.~ m .-i
A m m 9292 = 1291 92e2 3 a D w $ e J r" Z 979!1281 O
m Tt 9302 C O N .�. r ti G ... w t..- u m
+� Z Z to 9]!I U) 9701 9297 9)0l N9301 n w •- G G G'' . O 1101
..vv 2 .tea- .o Y r
m n Z Z 0 p 9311 9]02 = .N- �., ., �.,
y {S S 9322 Z n 9321 9322 " D 9321
Z Z p 9321 9322 Z 9Dl 9112 Z KANAKOA '- LN. Z 9331
Z r 9111 9))2 73/1 97/2 $ u y 9341
G) 9111 931 9342
9357 9)51 9152 w ti LEMUR LN
NORI
O 9351 9)S2 O ti Y $
`' .u. G 9762 'o 9361 9762 :S1 ~ •- •- •- 9)11
f361 9172 9171 917
u ~HANAKAI LN:
STARFIRE~ LN: 9371 9382 - titi p G N !nt
.- 9797 y .. 9192 s» w
9381 93e O G7 9181 �� '
m w 9u7 D w w w 9112 $ G 9391
n 9191 139 -4 N 9391 3 r ". ". F, ,"', 911
co y m " ,� 972 l/Ol
Z 9401 9402 z 0 9401 9122 r w Y Yo' irFr ZAMORA F Y ~ LN. 9421
2 D 412 z 942 9u: FAIRLANE CR. 9u7 U
mf171 !u2
0 9421 9422 w 91/1O9411 91J2 !1]l 9u2O !ul' 131 915 9u 91/ °� 9167 9/11 9/17 9IIL 9N2 1111 11121111
/Sl9/S2 u 1461 9462 — 9161 >/6 0461M91/2 l/6l f/c2 91i1 91 ou f177 7171 !u] .'Z] e71 4/7 171 1 f17
~ ~ BUSHARD
BEACH
o0 ll
U.oll
.al
.0o
0l1t Bo
Boll)doll e BoilB
Boll0)1
101,
Boil soi .0 1 . t v 20812 0022 ..1, au
20814 41 ao)l et /og2086
2081 LN.
10l, eoBoon wtou20.20 IOSI2os22 1 106olS 001107,
407,
8071
so I 071
0. C. F. C. D.
k
8 8 Y 8 Y 8
u)l ` Bill 0 N O ua]
sill CATAMARAN F LN sill O n au]
V1 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 9 8 7� m 0) Orr Bill
.Ill Blu Z $ _ Z But U) f Z
O w w w » G w w w u N G mm .ln
slat /I), el)1 e157 elSlw »el)7 /tft .If] (.) 0tsl 'n G)p 6U,
„67 0161 D m
RU 0171 0172 1167 e1e1 p Bill
ua C) alai ill enl r 817 alai S = z 3
> m 4191 p C H77
/I91 1191 0191 ^ e191 819, m east 0192 � 0191 9192 ;A 01e3
uo, O O Z_
SCHOONER Blot 8707 2 .701 e107 AO 6201 e302 a201 8707 .r. � •� el9]
9!'a
ul7 LN m 8711 B71] 8211 e,17 8211 ell, H
= '<ell] attx m e,71 et„ A e]n alit A e7]1 e,u enl Z
FARNSWORTH LN
D ... 242 ex41 8 8 I8 8 8 8 8 $ o 0 0 0 o g a Go o ant e,el D
e'
e]s, .lct .'.. » » » » » » » .�.. ° /lft Bill
`y 361 .26, ant 8 8 8 S 8 8 8 q�°� » en, g F $ g f R $ R R R $ N °� r 825,
Z 271 1277 � .�. 6202 y r e7u .�
De,91 B1+x COLIMA Y o LN o e19; GOSHAWK~ Y » ~LN sltt
$lot alaislot a)ot Blot alol 8302 e, u R R R $ R $ St $ $ .Iti
/ill eltt a)l] n Sill B)i) < » » 4117
Ult D > .)ri» Bill ell w
SZ LN Bill aln 2t e)17 D en, e317 o R R R $ R R R .)ol 8101
elu »
~ A Bill ell! Bill r e) 11 e112 fill! D .112 ~ .. .. pl, qlt
4141 elu e)u D alu e1u n 0)41 ~EGRET r LN s,,, u),
s,17 $141 B1)] > e1Si o
e)s1 B)st e1s7 Z .)sl .)fill e)sl e,$) el), p ° o A R R a /,41 e347
/1 l () .767 » w w w w w Bill
el slst uu alu e)61 /n] MATAR LNG B»1 utl o R A g Y R & Ro .,u
IM u72 437t u7l .nt Blat o ° 0� SANDPIPER
° uu uu
,,,, „B, 8397 ANDPIPER ~
D pSl a)81 Uel 2191 S J o y o )0 LN
am list 8191 .,+1 8401 ' • ilex 08111 — = 6381 lie) sill
.401 .10, M 5401 u97 .� e,91 /)9] m 6711 6)91 m
Z ALICANTE~ LN. a+l /,�i
—1 14ot 84ol e4ol I'll D m '0 u9t
D Sul 8422 A Sul .u) 8 SrJ N07 Z .401 Noll O .401 /407 Z e101 6407
But v , m Z /401
p w u w u w 1422 But 84xx N",, H.112H)t Silt sill e411 6i)1 sus p ° w°i4 n � Silt alai 0B4u /u, B44, 444442 � alai - Sul fill Bill w:•4)7 MISSION �[ LN. » .4rd
J e4U BH1 Hx 4441 eou?Js162 .461 .46, /46l .... 0461 .Ili 6
v
NEWLAND
ATLANTA .
�r e
Z I n n =
n • m o
r
(21022 AC - - - - j CHEZ 21oz1
21oJ2 :� ----{f-. ;, ORO� APTS. Q LOSARBOUTOSAPTS.
21040 :-K Q " , 210/1 w
21013 '•-4 = I 21051 =.
pQ-
2}Qfi4 21071 U'
r-IATTLEBORO __ O.
= zn,.• Y; CR. •-_.JiT1St� D1�Ye -'—_•� —1
U 21070-
Q 21076S PP ._ ------ o !
w 0 �.Ml�OL6URN- __-•-_-- "DR:. MARINER'S COVE WEST c:u
m - CONDOS
2109/ A 8LrirrON ; S :wJENNY
21116
]Z •:____ _ - CREW DR.
AS T DR.� 21142 21111 21112.141 --� -
21142
21116 ��--T?QR_----- r-'----'--. 211A1 I tJ •'• ----
21150 U 21152 21151 21152'21151 t
_ 21170 O 'ATTLEBORO 2ll51 � ,•
21171 21172 O � LN. 21161 = 21162 21161 J 21162 21161 J MARMIET('q CQV _
U116: --- _-- u171 J 21172 21171 21172.21371DEERFIELD APTS. �.
Q N 2ll91 21192 21191 21192121191 `----
21202 21201 21202 21201 • ;t
W � 21201 _ -r' . ' Q
m 21211 21212 21211 21212.21211 ; �
_fnWTLICtCET 2� - --'-pq;' 21222 21221 21222:21221 •�'O� Z
21221
21231 SCONE DR 21222121231 HiIIHEAD 04 2
O O 23211 21212�21211 21242,`21241 l
U p O O W 21is2!21251 ml m m� mlm «I m'o'ei m^«.�m:� w
Rf0GEF1ELA 1-• � Q Lw pR• 11251 21252 21251 t� « •Im.m Z
Z U_ Z �L ', 2L-61 21262 21261 DRYMEN OR S
�~i/ :f.121271 21272 21271 21272121271 W e�m^I m1�1��'= ~0�.m
W Q, 0: ` J m m,m m
21710 = pp w 31292;21291 2 m e
m •a21291 a 21292 21291
L) •w•• m — _ •—• — u DONCASTER DR
iw:21301 Q 21102:21301
w• BUSthV1CK D ,ct� ci x1Jo2 2uo1 m l I ,
HUNTINGTON O x: •w - 2111zx1711 « el« �.•.«
v , ,21J1 1J122111 ^� nl-,«« =1=,�� =:6a
BREAKERS EOXNnII �R.-� { e m
—` 1J23 21J21 elm ml
ASHBURTON 21J21 21]22 21321
R. C_...; ATTLEBOR� w•, �"
LN mlm �m mlm,m
U
0STORAGE
O TANKS
/
I�j O
TANK 0 l
FARM 0 O O •■
(NO THRU STREET)
463
(133)j1S n8Hl ON)
tuff zun Iwt rn,t p{ uoi ua,t�uarc uan �ra+r 'rr m � b` � ❑ y uy +ran r+t i'rn
4nl ff+l ^ [Safi fD Isaf tuft lull fnt O ,ant )+rrr C Krf fr frafi
7 tfr
rl fra+1 In+t IM+1_ yrt tfsl!<+,fi Q fl'{fr rcart O r`'f fnr rrrrf
2!0 r tr ; trot tnf t+f Orr,,,t•+rr 2 ryfr O ry =Knr•ry Y ryr
irn ,rut O rt •t r t T rru
uuc unl NIf10N_O`J 11691 f rty .� trot un tturo y+ti!<'rr r'trrrr aft++ f r
�-•, 4ff1 xnt rtrr try ir'rfr I"ryar tlrr t' r4nra rr+r'+� r°'rr Orr r 4r=
ua,l rant r nn f R of <^rf 2 r a++a+w»war .2
r«,t 1210dN3AVO
infi irnxt—
LGJAT N7b'M0uvos tal+` <y O lull unl Ien, um L lent and ( .
nni r not Z r �j nm Lsnl m ,nt not 2 u+ rf __
tW't finT lin Lr)ft fA lM` tsnl••• _ r+) y+�trnl-
_I
l s t+n trot M` + t rn trot nn,"' y y _ a Syr rt`+r�xyfr
Tanl I.""I (NUIDNOJiV nnl esnl tMt x n n t•nt un s y0y1 r L4tf•,rr •yr y r,yr
afnt um ££B90 u++t s.,+t n+,t L•, 1-,nOW ryr trot y� S
Lrl t tzn IOC``°Og F
nnl t? tM
unl ixm ttNt P ,on,toot $m
T Hlan+„ xxn,
ouvOB
' =t7i!�trst^ -d0 3Td0
D
,S .9 a7 r r oav�id
_ O � •- - --�� 'S1dV $t N uu,trot s �'
-
''6u
Z HOIRMH " y uul uni unl
S (>ODIIS.vsDOL90 \^dy y nda1d0
ayis N run,unl r N 0 6 D
••• �2 .gyp tfnl nnl
v s s
py0dNV2iB
------ ------t•
- n
'NO NOIMNOId
(HOIMNOId £b£b) mHVd
'700HOS M31A UCeUVH Z -
aa
a
m
0
a e
AVH VNVLLSRIHO Oa
113H 1f9i1
4't��,�� o,,• � a� `L�h
S
aO a3MSid
r rP"g._
1E lrflItn�'tlno'b,Y••;L ~O,p�O
� a �
� N IaLfl iaL,l 2 IaLf1 tOx)1 J ,ant
� tai,t ntfl >tCft N`n+l •�r•\
"' Z YYI. Ylb,Y1 � +itLfl t[Z)i �I[Lft - taZf !ft�
O •a. uo orurfrff � - tun - � a~r
S.r_ Z avt �°• n Z
O
rn
j�r IT
'l, � 1 YYYI Ylb.ftl r ` +°♦,,` �� la,ft+„ isnl
�£� 53TBv+J 4 ;Zp rift Flo afa..lt `r` ilk. o+ tent
' of vtstn �flrii: �• _ -,ro3Y
3 tYS �l
a30NI03
(NO THRU STREET) (NO THRU STREET)
fty yaaa ^ ^ ,x�,asr, Lassa aa,l, f.r to ,cnxnaf+, t..+x,>w,2 t,°u
f >o as j ya•"x .,, ^ t usss la WE-s P-0!
P � p4 tn• % ay�a i £p GR.y aan+ yarp a•�„t taaaF 8 - � a 8 _
G •Q 4 >o X a.ptr %tTr .. � taria ad.P.'• _ - _ .. _ z - � L - d S umr ,mu ,ron �
P�' s' C�� "cF' Z sx 3 m ta'`l "••, "OHlll" � ° t:w:,rat ,rwr trw, .Z
Q ,ys��• 9 y'°a K ya : '��' at' S 3 6- °,.� tras: t>mt ylesx (il
(HAR$QRI
PACIFF�lC/' - °a 9R\S� ••C'� - - - - 3 - - - ti o ox n^a
"EOGEWATER
y99,q� v 3" 8 - - _ 1J �tly slpt t„off out
�oG
9A x < ` — �,aytl 111N 1>1.1 tllal 1)Ux >`N
'q WEATHERLY BAY ` a>tsx >r•�
s�� ;
`SHPP Ci'---�, = i7 ALADDIN OR, v,rra,nrs uxn >
�c0 t '"•0 wz<N — = i Zm HUNTINGTON HARBOUR
3� P.C.H. BAY CLUB CONOOS
(172 21
- -C Iml
.y ti BEACH l.x, 3 .r - /"���/
WARNER AVE WARNER AV
E. F+S LOS PATO:
173 & 174
YORKTOWN
J
� J
O
O
CNIC CENTER
irn
1,12 t,51
rQ' ♦.1 H K ,.
T , (,I1 1 ffll ftt Lu f
�L 1,;! t,l` ; r L�1 , v f�f C 1, > , ill. ills ,L 1,
tit
t lilt I'll m, 1'It
p' 1,0 1,0r I;On I,01
Ot I,Ot 1,0, Ot t,0 J e,
I,Ot IrOi 1,0t 1,0t .,0. 1,0t
tR G
419
Inl l,2
l
IQ
utr _
toll
—tct� loll
nt
/1 t17 lltl I,a; I0�
i,a,
I'tt lrsi a, WEST SPRINGFIELD
-
- tta5 Iltt itu
I tit al _
J "I' (r t'rho
Vu t
W InU 1/11 17b
-Q J n n,
Z tr 11t
„�� , w tn. ms nls to
t it
t
Ito! Iron QCC
: ��1. U IrOr L tart y Iru ,rtt w 1
-Grp' IrOt Cm I�—q
J lit
J bt
ADAMS
HE\• �� _— _ Oat(t, lil( lll+nl F .. ��. .'.I_ .1 .'.ice 1111
n'n,'� �•. =`=`. OtlrO! tali Ff.
� trotR—Mm
lltt
� — n! tiai
'r, y Lc U AVE Ilil
SMITH SCHOOL 'r• utl n+ ttl+ n:a uu uu
ts. tt,t tltt uu fur tut
uu ulr ut u ttt: uu utt
° ula til° Ilot z not not uo,
r u. uo+ nl• uo) ual a uai ,la trot
BARN t„ ,; THIRTEENTH AYE OSWE
art
,ut aw
at 4rn = `rn �� ��f
fart
- ✓ tat
us lore Ials i _ _I tau
H
las �, I lau
/\ OwrcR SCHCCL n •� --t:atn p Vc
(1502 5� Est y �i'� =L� M•\.-,tlt�' 4 v lae�
,o PALM) ''r� I o!
Y toot
r � LAKE PARK MEMP-
y ELEvEN ,
FARCUHAR oI=lZ:Ixlo
PARK ( "°
a'J ri, J Ir V I= ,Il
rENr,y
,al
J
o TIT—
CREST ,i•
Sr ` tt V n5 7L
titl �
err d ts, t,t
V ? 115 11 tt,
1)l
IIl 1>t
t5• � tt, tIi
/ar5a t5 iJ
431, 441 8c 451
PALM••
1
FI
lJ
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Public Works
FAX - Cover Sheet
To: Don Osborne
Company: Diehl Evans
Phone:
Fax: 949 399-0610
From: Linda Daily
Company: Huntington Beach Public Works
Phone: 714-536-5599
Fax: 714-374-1573
Pages including 7
cover page
Comments: Following are the 99/01 budget pages (3) for the SB 2766
funds; and a copy of the report screen. The report was E-filed with AQMD.
Effective, but not condusive to printing. Call me if you have other
questions.
t
C:ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC_
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
DEPARTMENT FUNCTION:. ;: .,ACCOUNTING DIV. PROGRAM NAME
Public Works General Government AQ-PW-107 Air Quality Fund 4
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE: To comply with the legal obligations of South Coast Air Quality Management District mandates for
cleaner air throughout vehicle emissions reduction. The use of these funds must comply with established AQMD criteria for
reduction of particulate matter.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES: Document emissions reductions according to AQMD formulas. Build traffic signals to replace four-
way stop in three intersections. Fund two bus drivers for the Senior Transportation Program. Fund a video-conferencing program at
the Central Library. Fund Internet applications for Water Service.
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES & Actual Actual Budget Department Projection
GENERATED REVENUE FY 96/97' FY 97/98 FY 98/99 ;-FY„1999/00' FY 2000/01
Performance Measures
Conduct emission reduction analysis 30: 30
Complete budgeted capital projects "G:o "? %= '= a s3':r 2 f
Audit compliance of program revenue 1 u?_ ,:;` `=fA' 0 `
Advanced electronic technology projects I :=4 <; 2: 2
Complete grant applications 3
Program Related Revenue w
Subvention Funds 180;000: SI80,000
51
Total Program Related Revenue " 5180,000.001" S180,000.00
TABLE OF ORGANIZATION Actual Actual Budget Department Projection i!
RANGE /CLASSIFICATION FY 96/97 FY 97/98 FY 98/99 1eifY FY 2000/01
Permanent Positions`;;`,"-" ":-
439 Management Assistant 0 0 0 :°. ` 4a;0: 0
z�� �,:
Principal Analyst 0 0 0 w;;;";: :OS' .06.
463 Traffic Technician 0 0 0 45'; 45
347 Office Assistant II 0 0 0 .05
Total Permanent Positions 0.00 0.00 0.00 ;;0.55; 0.55
IL
Non-Permanent Positions
Bus Driver ''? '„'. =2;: 2
773
!{ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PROGRAM COST DETAIL
Department Function Accounting Division 10jJ Program Name
Public Works General Government AQ-AD=107 Air Quality Fund
<--------Historical Data------------> <----Proposed Budget---->
Estimated Department
Acct. Actual Actual Budget Actual Request
No. Personal Services FY 1996/97 FY 1997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 FY 2000/01
110 Salaries,Permanent 12,550 3,891 13.051 6,525 28,235 28,799
120 Salaries,Temporary 14,691 0 0
130 Salaries,Overtime 0 0
--- Benefits,Permanent 3,435 4,299 3,518 1,759 9,412 9,882
--- Benefits,Temporary 0 213 0 0 0 0
--- New Positions
Total Personal Services 15,985 23,094 16,569 8,284 37,646 38,681
Operating Expense
211 Postage 100
221 Supplies/Equip,Special Dept 500
225 Awards&Presentations 27,942 1,060
231 Supplies,Info Sys 20,000
250 Mileage Reimbursement 100
390 Contractual Services 2,500 150,000 348 50,000 30,000
397 Auditing 3,000
545 Dues&Memberships 333 341
560 Charges To Departments 10.500 10,500 10.500
594 Discounts Lost 320
Total Operating Expense 41,275 12,221 164,200 348 70,000 30,000
Capital Projects
PROJECTS(See listing on Project Detail Form) 525,000 305,000
320 Automated Permit Proc. System 238,000
Total Capital Costs 0 0 238,000 0 525,000 305,000
Gross Program Cost 57,260 35,315 418,769 8,632 632,646 373,681
Program Reimbursement
Net Program Cost 57,260 35,315 180,769 8,632 632,646 373,681
Bgt00-cp.xls 774 8/19/99
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Department Function Accounting Div. Program Name
Public Works General Gov't. AQ-PW-410 Air Quality Fund 1
_
....::.:::::......
DEPARTMENT- ::U T:::_:: _
Description
FY>:1999/00'>:<:: <'FY 2( 00/O1'>
Project
i
I
o'e
i
ale Pr ct s
t
L
0 -
c a Selection from Traffi Sin ) rio ' li t vpriority list.
Install n traffic gn I � g p }
I
Upgrade Traffic Signal Timing i'25,000 Develop new weekday/weekend&seasonal
c' sie nal timingprograms.
ro rams.
D
3 i
I
Videocoriferencing Installs system at Central Lib aFunding
includes a$�0000 state rant fromthe So
uth
- 'c Quality D'�tn or
Coast u i t f Au
Q Y
equ
ipment. The project will provi
de for a
commuting needs and of ition o comet n ds 1 reduction f
8 P
throuQh Pro promoting local videocoofe ene'm g
centers.
Install 1nev Traffic
c Signal 130 000 Selectionfro
m Traffic Signal priority list.
t.
IntelligentTransportation S stem
100,000 Partial match for 2m"ITS"grant Pro
a
.
Internet for Water Customers �0 000 Allow
application cats wi
thout d idm to the
Civic Center.
TOTAL S525,000.1 S305,000
Cap00-cp.x1s 8/19/99 8:21 PM
775
Canceled Projects . (Optional) - • use••Tab,•'.°'Enter", or"Page Down'• keys to
move through this form
AIR DISTRICT NAME: t AQMD
Page 1 of,1
Use pull
Local Government NaMSC Huntington Beachdown menus.
Project NameAutomated permit-processi ng
Number of category must match number of subcateg
Cateaorv: .. Use putl
Subcateaorv (6e)Telecommunication
nstallation of planning &building permit processing through the internet.
After further analysis, project costs exceeded current budget limitations.
down menus.
Describe
the Project
j_and tell why. •
canceled): Motor Vehicle Funding Recovered: � ��� (AB 2766?
For One-Page Summary For Hardcopy of
of Each Project Computer Screens ;��t,e
End of Form
Local Government Motor -Vehicle Fee Program
AIR DISTRICT NAME: South Coast Cities&CountiesPage 1 of 2
Use pull
Local Government Name: SC Huntington Beachdown
' County Name• • Co.
AB 2766
Motor Vehicle Revenues(current Xeari: $206,684. Balance brought forward includes
- projects canceled or under budget
Interest: $21,854and agrees with prior year's audited
Balance Brought Forward: $517,895financial statements
Describe Balance Brought Forward: See Canceled Projects form
Optional: You may use the Canceled Projects
form to itemize projects canceled or under
Administrative Costs: S $0
.Overhead not chargeable directly to a specific program but is charged
proportionally to local government departments or functions. State law requires
that administrative costs be no more than 5%of motor vehicle fee revenues. Continue to
Percent Admin Costs are of MV Revenues: Ali f�, �!'a,il' ��' ` ' r• next page
iI
ON*-7r,MT-T. 0 0 0 Page 2 of 2
Funds accumulated and conceptually obligated or"earmarked"by the city council or Board of
Supervisors for speck uses in the future but have NOT been officially obligated or spent.
Describe "Earmarked": ffic signal installations,traffic counts&videoconferencing
stem budgeted ■•
Motor Vehicle Fees Coordinator City Manager or County Executive Officer
Ray
Title: Title:
First Name: First Name:
Last Name: DailySilver
Address: •• Box 190For One-Page Summary
City: Huntington Beach
State: Zip Code92648
Phone: 714-536-5599714-374-1573 Lit
, Extension:
Far liardcopy of Computer Screens
FAX:
e-mail: Dailyl@surfcity-HB.org End of Farm
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
® INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
4o TO: Ray Silver, City Administrator
�µ
FROM: ��Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM
y DATE: January 18, 2000
PARKING TICKETS ISSUED
(JANUARY 3 — 12, 2000)
1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6 1-7 1-10 1-11 1-12 ' h TOTALS.;,
DAY (Monday) (Tues) (Wed) (Thurs) (Fri) (Mon) (Tue ) (Wed)
°.DATE:',,;
665 497 460 262 213 181 336 521
SUMMARY
• Total citations issued (January 3-12, 2000) = 3,135
• Total miles swept (January 3-12, 2000) = 904 miles
• Number of citations issued per mile (3,135 - 904) = 3.5
• Estimated total number of single family dwellings swept (1/3 — 1/12) = 36,000
• % of dwelling units cited (3,135 citations = 36,000 single family dwelling units swept) = 8.8%
*Note:
By January 14, 2000 the entire City will have been swept once under the enforced "No Parking" regulation. Preliminary
assessments of the enforcement program should not be initiated until a full month of service has been rendered.
1
POSTING PROBLEMS RESOLVED TO DATE
fj
LO ` ESRIPON O ?;' O METOOF RSOLUTION ,R
Huntington Townhomes Insufficient on-site parking. Homeowners Association has agreed to
(Adams @ Bushard) sweep streets twice per month.*
, `.. : % __
:: l U
11 ll ," ,,.
.w
h„r i
iv
q
11
Cambro Mfg Co. Insufficient on-site parking. Manufacturer has agreed to sweep„
1 (Huntington @ Clay) streets twice per month.*
.:.
;.
gg
H.B. Community Clinic Insufficient on-site parking. Changed sweeping schedule.
(Beach @ Newland)
Ocean View Schools Insufficient on-site parking. Combination of changes in sweeping
(Various locations) schedule and the construction of
temporary on-site parking facilities by the
school district.
Huntington Beach Elementary Schools Insufficient on-site parking. Changed sweeping schedules.
(Various locations)
* Street sweeping is inspected by staff. Failure to provide adequate level of service could necessitate sweeping by city.
POSTING PROBLEM UNRESOLVED TO DATE
Seacliff residential tracts Short driveways, at some locations, Currently under investigation. Video
necessitate use of garages for parking. inspection, by staff, on sweeping day did
Garages currently used for other not reveal a serious problem. Meeting
activities. with H.O.A. representatives on January
20, 2000.
2
/
PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAM
Press releases issued to local newspapers
November 0 Internet Page placed under Public Works Home Page
9 Continued water bill insert mailings
0 Added Street Sweeping information to HBTV-3 Scroll
0 Begin issuing Warning Citations
December 0 Completed water bill insert mailings
0 Completed issuance of Warning Citations
January e Article appeared in Sands Magazine (delivered to 70,000 homes)
RFB:bh '
`
cc: Ronald E. Lowanbero. Chief ofPolice
Lloyd Edwavds, Trmffio/Aaro Bureau Cmdr.
Karen Pabaroon, Parking Control Supervisor
Don Noble, Maintenance Operations Manager
John Tan/in. 8tveetlVVoebsvvahar Maintenance Supervisor
3
o
/tsy
PIO information plan (street sweeping) o-, 1/3100
Results
October:
HB Infoline (374-4800 x 405) will be activated and message
recorded. Fax back information loaded into system. Police and
Public Works to supply wording and sample violation.
Completed — message accessed more than 700 times in
December and more than 380 maps of sweeping areas have
been faxed as of Jan 3, 2000.
Press Release outlining program will be released mid-October to
inform local papers of the program starting Nov. 1
Completed— several articles in local papers a result
November:
Press Release outlining program will be released late- October to
inform local papers of the program starting Nov. 1 (this can be a
re-issuing of October Press Release.
Completed— several articles in local papers a result
Internet page will be designed to inform public of street sweeping
information. Link will be placed under Public Works from the main
home page.
Completed — also featured color map of sweeping areas
Press Release outlining program will be released late- October to
inform local papers of the program starting Nov. 1
Completed — several articles in local papers a result
HBTV-3 Scroll
December:
Water bill mailer
Completed ,5-SI 00--o -kk,4iC��
January:
Telephone calls
Estimated up to 40 per day
SANDS magazine article.
Will describe program in quarterly magazine which is distributed to
70,000 households in Huntington Beach.
Completed — Magazine to be mailed to 70,000 homes in
Huntington Beach as of Jan. 10, 2000.
Warning Citations (issued by Police Dept.)
Completed - 33,363 Warning citations
Enforcement Begins: (Citations issued By the Police Dept.)
693 Citations issued on January 3, 2000
Af
.1,Nl :-.- ' '
e
Capital Program
benefits city wRf _
f Huntington Beach rt Residents o H t ton
-
;y ,u"
have benefited from more than $388
million in Capital Improvements _
throughout the 1990s.
From replacing damaged trees at
Central Park and storm drain mainte-
Hance to reduce the threat of flood-
ing, the Capital Improvement Pro-
gram provides for the construction '
and maintenance of facilities on a
city-wide basis which are not eligible
for funding from other sources.
Among the projects that have '
benefited from the Capital Improve-
ment Program is the rehabilitation of
the Huntington Central Library,
repairs to the 1�856-foot Municipal Crews have been busy in 1999 repairing aging sewer lines in Downtown Huntington
Please see Capital Program` page 3 Beach, part of a Capital Improvement Program benefiting residents in the city.
New Year begins with cleaner streets
Huntington Beach streets are getting cleaner. On November 1, 1999, Huntington Beach began sweeping all public
arterial and residential streets twice per month.
As a result of substantial shortfalls in the City's 1996 General Fund Revenues, citywide street sweeping services
were reduced from "twice per month"to"once per month." Subsequent to this change, there have been numerous
concerns expressed about stagnant, standing water and the overall poor appearance of the city streets. Additionally, the
quantity of debris flowing into the city's storm drain system, including the Bolsa Chica, harbor waterways and the ocean,
have increased substantially. Due to these concerns, the City Council has reinstated "twice per month"sweeping.
"NO PARKING"POSTING:
Citywide parking prohibitions will be in effect on sweeping days. Signs with a four-hour restriction "window"will be
placed at the entrance to each residential tract. Tracts without the typical entrances will require individual street posting,
with signs placed at approximately 150-foot intervals. Certain portions of the City's arterial street system will require
individual sign posting where homes front the street. Commercial and industrial areas will not be posted, as these areas
will be swept between the hours of 3:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. Residential streets, within certain high-density develop-
ments, will be posted for"alternate side sweeping, which will allow for some parking availability at all times by restricting
parking on only one side on sweeping days.
SWEEPING ROUTE SCHEDULES:
Route schedules have been designed to insure maximum productivity. They are based on prior, twice per month
schedules as well as on an analysis of an ongoing street sweeping field survey. Additionally, the route schedules coin-
cides with Rainbow Disposal's refuse pickup schedule; hence, streets typically will be swept the day after that of refuse
collection.
ENFORCEMENT:
The Police Department will perform enforcement of the parking prohibitions. Citations, costing $32 per violation, will
be issued only when a vehicle is parked on the street at the time of sweeping beginning January 3, 2000. This means
that vehicles may be returned to the street as soon as the sweeper has passed the parking location.
Call 960-8861 for more information or call the HB InfoLine at 374-4800 message 405 to receive a map of days of
sweeping schedule.
http://Ci.hu ntington-beach.ca.us
f%%✓�
IMPORTANT PHONE `
-`
�. NUMBERS
CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH
General Information -t, PUBLIC WORKS
(714) 960-8861
"Nofir. i
Information and Map '` STREET
(714) 374-4800
SWEEPING .
6"1
Message #405MA
f
41
Beginning
City of HuntingtonBeach November 1, 1999
2000 00 Main Street
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
g,nrw4.
EXPANSION OF "NO PARKING" POSTING: Rainbow Disposal's refuse pickup
STREET schedule;hence, streets typically will
Citywide parking prohibitions will be swept the day after refuse
SWEEPING be in effect on sweeping days. collection.
Signs,with a four-hour restriction
SERVICES "window,"will be placed at the ENFORCEMENT:
entrance to each residential tract.
Tracts without the typical entrances The Police Department will perform
As a result of substantial shortfalls will require individual street posting, enforcement of the parking
in the City's 1996 General Fund with signs placed at approximately prohibitions. Citations, costing$32
Revenues, citywide street sweeping 150-foot intervals. Certain portions per violation,will be issued only
services were reduced from"twice of the city's arterial street system will when a vehicle is parked on the
per month" to "once per month." require individual sign posting street at the time of sweeping
where homes front the street. beginning January 3, 2000. This
Subsequent to this change, there Commercial and industrial-areas will means that vehicles may be returned
have been numerous concerns not be posted, as these areas will be to the street as soon as the sweeper
expressed about stagnant, standing swept between the hours of 3:00 has passed the parking location.
water and the overall - poor a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Residential
appearance of the city streets.
streets,within certain high-density,
Additionally' the quantity of debris
developments,will be posted for
flowing into the city's storm drain "alternate side sweeping," which will 4
system, including the Bolsa Chi ca, allow for some parking availability at
harbor waterways and the ocean, all times by restricting parking on
have increased substantially. Due to only one side on sweeping days.
these concerns, the City Council has
reinstated "twice per month" SWEEPING ROUTE
sweeping. SCHEDULES:
FREQUENCY OF SERVICE: Route schedules have been designed
All public arterial and residential to ensure maximum productivity.'They are based on prior,twice per
streets will be swept twice per month schedules, as well as on an
month beginning November 1,
analysis of an ongoing street
1999. sweeping field survey. Additionally,
the route schedules coincide with
Huntington Beach Government Page 1 of 2
f ,
iY .ro'Y4,
Huntington Beach Government Information
California State Beach Water Closure
• General Information
• Quality Service Statement
• Departments
o City Administration
. Administrators Newsletter
o City Clerk
o Citv_Treasurer
o Public Information Office
. HBTV-3
o Fire
o Police
o Lifeguards/Marine Safety
■ Juinor Lifeguards
o Public Works Department
■ Strect Sweeping
o Building and Safety Department
o Planning Department
o Community Services
• Recreation and Classes
■ Film Office
o Economic Development
o Library
• Community Overview
. Jobs Available
http://ww,�v.scag.org/homepages/huntington_beach/govt.htm 12/28/99
streetsweep Page 1 of 1
Twice a month Street Sweeping begins in November
Beginning Monday,November 1, 1999, the City of Huntington Beach will increase its street
sweeping services to twice per month. As a reminder of the changes in on-street parking, Warning
Parking Citations will be issued during the months of November and December to cars parked
in the path of the sweeper.Normal parking citations will be issued beginning Monday,January 3,
2000.
To insure the highest level of service possible,residents will not be permitted to park on the city
streets during sweeping operations. Although the Parking Prohibition is for four hours, residents can
park on the street before and after the sweepers pass.No cars should be in the street when the
sweeper passes. Several residential areas, with high-density populations, will be posted for alternate
side sweeping.
The result of the additional sweeping will be cleaner streets, storm drains.and an improved quality of
street cleanliness for all residents.
Areas to be swept, and the days that they will be swept, are posted on public street signs. Sweeping
information is also available at the City's HB Infoline at(714) 374-4800, extension. 405. The area
map can be faxed back to residents from this number, or follow this link to a map of the street
sweeping
Street Sweeping Map (large file)
http://www.scag.org/homepages/huntington_beach/streetsweep.htm 12/28/99
j, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
Office of Public Information
(714)536-5511
For immediate release Media contact: Don Noble (714) 375-5024
October 21, 1999 Lt. Lloyd Edwards (714) 536-5661
#99-143 Jim Hanggi (714) 536-5249
City to begin street sweeping twice a month
Beginning Monday,Nov. 1, 1999,the City of Huntington Beach will increase its
street sweeping services to twice per month. As a reminder of the changes in on-street
parking, Warning Parking Citations will be issued during the months of November and
December to cars parked in the path of the sweeper. Normal parking citations will be
issued beginning Monday, Jan. 3, 2000.
To insure the highest level of service possible, residents will not be permitted to park
on the city streets during sweeping operations. Although the Parking Prohibition is for
four hours, residents can park on the street before and after the sweepers pass. No cars
should be in the street when the sweeper passes. Several residential areas, with high-
density populations, will be posted for alternate side sweeping.
The result of the additional sweeping will be cleaner streets, storm drains and an
improved quality of street cleanliness for all residents.
Areas to be swept, and the days that they will be swept, are posted on public street
signs. Sweeping information is also available at the City's HB Infoline at (714) 374-
4800, message 405 or on the City's official Website at: http://ci.huntington-beach.ca.us.
The sweeping area map can be faxed back to residents from this number.
-30-
�, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET office of Public Information CALIFORNIA 92648
(714)536-5511
For immediate release Media contact: Don Noble (714) 375-5024
December 28, 1999 Lt. Lloyd Edwards (714) 536-5661
#99-189 Jim Hanggi (714) 536-5249
Huntington Beach to begin issuing $32 citations for parking
violations on street sweeping days
Beginning Monday, Jan. 3, 2000, the City of Huntington Beach will begin issuing
$32 fines as part of the city's increased street sweeping services to cars parked in the way ..
of street sweepers. As a reminder of the changes in on-street parking, Warning Parking
Citations were issued during the months of November and December 1999 to cars parked
in the path of the sweeper.
However, normal parking citations will be issued beginning Monday, Jan. 3, 2000.
To insure the highest level of service possible, residents will not be permitted to park
on the city streets during sweeping operations. Although the Parking Prohibition is for
four hours, residents can park on the street before and after the sweepers pass. No cars
should be in the street when the sweeper passes. Several residential areas, with high-
density populations, are posted for alternate side sweeping.
The result of the additional sweeping is cleaner streets, storm drains and an improved
quality of street cleanliness for all residents.
Areas to be swept, and the days that they will be swept, are posted on public street
signs. Sweeping information is also available at the City's HB Infoline at(714) 374-
4800, message 405 or on the City's official Website at: http://ci.huntington-beach.ca.us.
The sweeping area map can be faxed back to residents from this number.
-30-
. i
=mow
i„R3p
V
SKOVER,, '
sF ;�
ORANGE COUNTY
aµ �
WNS :BUILDING
COMMUNITY : TO . ..
'`-PAGE 2 / WEDNESDAY, DEC. 29, 1999 .3 DAYS TO THE MILLENNIUM •. www.discoveroc2000.coml
HUNTING TON
BEACH
Parking fines: Cars
parked in the way of
street sweepers will be .
cited beginning Monday
for a$32 fine. City offi-
cers have been-issuing
warnings regarding im-
properly parked cars j
since the city increased
sweeping services from
once to twice a month
Nov. 1.
— Helen Gao ,
(714)445-6692
Helan_Gawi link.freedom.com
pacific clippings pacific clippings
post office box 11789
santa ana, calif. 92711 post office box 11789
santa ana, calif. 92711
Huntington Beach Wave Huntington Beach Wave
Weekly . QCT 2, 8 1999 Weekly
Making Waves Larry Culver OCT 2 8 1.q9q
- vide fine arts, sports and sci=
N e w s B i t e s ence enrichment classes.
After school 344' Sullivan hopes that the
program will reach out to and
COMINC, UP___ AC7A//V?Z/ TN15 program launched benefit the school's Vietnamese
COUNCILMAN SHOW cxE-T5 RERUN The Children's Needs Task and Hispanic students,.who may
RALPH BAUEP- ALM05T A5MUC14 Force headed by Councilman be isolated from the student
ON EDUCATION AND A5 5E1 N FELD//. Dave Sullivan and Council- body because of language bar
THE 5CNCOL'I3oKD
155UE_._ woman Shirley Dettloff is plan- riers. These minority students
ning to launch an afterschool pi are estimated to make up about
lot program at Ocean View High 50 percent of the student body.
School. The task force is considering_.
o / The pilot program will pro- recruiting students from
Z y — NER Golden West College and Cali- I.
N6TV3 " vev fornia State . University,:'!
Ppr4 Fullerton to lead the program.
pacific clippings Michael Mudd, the city's di`
rector of cultural services,said
I� �•p _ post office box 11789 staff at the Huntington Beach
santa ana, Calif. 92711 Art Center will design an arts
class that will provide students
�ountain Valley View hands-on fine arts education.
Weekly
OCT 28
-- - pacific clippings
HUNTINGTON BEACH:Any- p m b 1 1 7 8 9
car over 25 feet long cannot be Santa ana, Calif. 92711
parked in a public street in
residential area.According to. The Register
pacifie cli in s employees at MikeThompson's Daily O
p p g RV,the average RV is about 34 CT 3 .Q z99Q
post office box 11789 feet.RVs over 25 feet are : HUNTINGTON
santa ana, calif. 92711 allowed to park in the street for BEACH
25 hours for loading and
Community Close Up unloading purposes.All cars Sfrdetsweeping:>The
Weekly cannot be parked in the same city will increase street-
Weekly 2 8 fops spotforover72hours,said sweeping services to
traffic engineer Bob Hidusky. twice a month starting
Monday. Police will is-
Ocean View High School plans sue warning parking ci-
tations during November ; -
after-school pilot-program and December. Normal
If(r parking citations will be
HELEN GAO and Hispanic students, who issued starting Jan. 3.
The Orange County Register tend to be isolated from the stu- Sweeping information is
dent body due to language bar- available on the city's
The Huntington Beach Chil- riers. These minority students HB Infoline at (714) 374-
dren's Needs Task Force are estimated to make up about 4800, message.405.
headed by Councilman Dave 50 percent of the student body. — Curt Seeden
Sullivan and Councilwoman The task force is considering (714)445 6681
Shirley Dettloff'is planning to recruiting students from Curt_Seeden 714)r445-6 81
launch an after-school pilot Golden West College and Cali-
program at Ocean View High fornia State University,
School. Fullerton,to lead the program.
The pilot program will pro-- Michael Mudd, the city's di-
vide fine arts, sports and sci- rector of cultural services,said
ence enrichment classes.- staff at the Huntington Beach
Sullivan hopes that the Art Center will design an arts
program-will reach out to and _class that will provide students
benefit the school's Vietnamese _hands=on fine arts,educatiori:
streetsweep Page 1 of 1
Twice a month Street Sweeping begins in November
Beginning Monday,November 1, 1999, the City of Huntington Beach will increase its street
sweeping services to twice per month. As a reminder of the changes in on-street parking, Warning
Parking Citations will be issued during the months of November and December to cars parked
in the path of the sweeper.Normal parking citations will be issued beginning Monday,January 3,
2000.
To insure the highest level of service possible,residents will not be permitted to park on the city
streets during sweeping operations. Although the Parking Prohibition is for four hours, residents can
park on the street before and after the sweepers pass.No cars should be in the street when the
sweeper passes. Several residential areas, with high-density populations, will be posted for alternate
side sweeping.
The result of the additional sweeping will be cleaner streets, storm drains.and an improved quality of
street cleanliness for all residents.
Areas to be swept, and the days that they will be swept, are posted on public street signs. Sweeping
information is also available at the City's HB Infoline at(714) 374-4800, extension. 405. The area
map can be faxed back to residents from this number, or follow this link to a map of the street
sweeping
Street Sweeping Map (large file)
i
http://www.scag.org/homepages/huntington—beach/streetsweep.htm 12/28/99
Pacific clippings
post office box 11789
santa ana, calif. 92711
Daily Pilot
Daily OCT 3 0
�/' . be' acbe' s ' stans
• to elected officialsof anyparty.�/ Otectfn tbe' ' And we need to look at our-w�th us selves and the little things we
can do and to incorporate
3�r � �
;'couple of.years ago,I Newport waters are not safe. gram at Newport Harbor and these things into our lives."
was asked what posed W H AT ' S V P 7 The sky over the beaches of Corona del Mar high schools. There is one more way.You
the greatest threat to the Newport is not falling.But the "Over 85% of ocean pollu can join the thousands of
„American family.Without hesi- Huntington Beach scum must tion comes from urban runoff, Surfriders Foundation members
,,ta.tion,I replied, "pollution." It _ ;.3.#,F serve as a wake-up call for us Farnham told me, "And there" who work to keepour beaches
':isn't just pollutions darkest side ' to start living the clean life. isn't one specific sourceAt clean.These peole aren't the
I:-the decreased ability to .*Y 2 The problem in Huntington, comes from our streets and our activist style;you won't seem
-:breathe or the increased possi- ? =< R: -,r- after a$1.2-million search found driveways and our storm drains them chaining themselves to a
'-bility of getting sick from our "' y">"`` no source,is quite likely folks directly to the ocean." buoy or forming a human
.:saltwater-that had me con- zF=3; with the same bad habits as you One of the greatest effects of blockade at a storm drain.This
::cerned.It was the idea that f" axv= and me.It's you and me and the beach pollution for Newport is an action group.Whether it's
::families could not be where small leak in the car we drive. Beach and Costa Mesa will be stenciling the "Drains to
.:they needed to be most once "`'° '`✓ It's you and me and the animal economic.Disneyland may Beach" signs on our sewers or
;they were out of their own poop we don't scoop.It's you have put Orange County on testing our waters,these are
;home. Steve and meland a thousand other the map, but our beaches have people who get things done.
"Pollution," I said; "will Smith ways we use our drainage sys- kept it there as tourists flock to What they are doing benefits
::keep people away from places tem as a trash can. our beautiful shores.The beach everyone and they deserve our
,,like the beach.Once that hap-. Doug Farnham,31,is a closures in Huntington affected support.As of this week,I am a
ems,it is the beginning of our our local lifestyle.The pollution, member of the steering com- businesses of all types and sizes Surfriders member.
you see,will not stop at the . mittee for the Newport Beach and is sure to happen here,too, The Surfriders Foundation
Our neighbors in Hunting- Huntington Beach city line. chapter of the Surfriders Foun- unless we are careful. meets the second Tuesday of
'-ton Beach are going through Germs don't carry maps. dation.In case you haven't It won't be hard to ruin our every month.November's
,,one of the worst tragedies to As recently as last Aug.28, heard, the Surfriders Founda- beaches.Newport has 2,000 meeting is on the 9th at 7 p.m.
,::befall the county in recent the Newport Beach City Coun- tion is in its 16th year and is no storm drains that dump runoff at the Oasis Senior Center in
,:memory.From the looks of it, cil, through Mayor O'Neil, longer a band of surfers trying into the water,many of which Newport Beach.For more infor-
•the bacteria and sewage that issued a water-testing report to protect their spots. bring pollution from other mation,call Doug Farnham at
:has infected their coastline will which showed that Newport The Surfriders Foundation cities.That's a lot of opportuni_ (949) 632-6273.Enjoy the
rmake the bankruptcy look like waters were safe.The mayor's now has more than 25,000 tie w s to make beaches dirty. beaches as you always have,
':a tea party. letter came one day after coup- members in 42 chapters world- .
Farnham offered several but respect them,too.
The cost of the cleanup is ty workers indicated that the wide. ways for people to stop beach e STEVE SMITH is a Costa Mesa resi-
:•not the only problem,it's the polluted Huntington water was In Newport,Farnham is the pollution. "The Surfriders dent and freelance writer.He can be
fact that this could signal the headed to Newport. guy who chairs the ultra-suc- Foundation is nonpartisan,so reached at(949)642-6086 or by e-
.':fateful beginning of the end of I have no indication that cessful "Test and Teach" pro- we encourage people to write mail at dailypilot®latimes.com.
pacific clippings
post office box 11789
santa ana; calif. 92711
Huntington'Beach Independent
Weekly
nrT28 ; �
Street. svvee .and •cost t0- cease
® Parking fines for cars wide Environmental Services; efficiently, for less money, with least one parking citation
which was awarded a two-year the help of the private sector. -before he begins to obey the
blocking •
contract :worth $330,000 annu-. City staffers bristle .at the.. .new parking restrictions.
to pay for clearing. �Y -notion :-that outsiders. -are To help.everyone ease into
The president of the munic muscling in on their turf. But the swing of things,.warnings-
Exorr BEN-YExw.a ipal employees -association, City Councilman Dave will be issued during
r�)I- • Independent Tom Hasty, said his members Garofalo said goyernment must November. and '.December,
can do a better job for about be downsized_ to its "core" according to a city memo dated
HUNTINGTON BEACH — $180,000_per year. functio fs:_which may or may. Oct. 21..
A private company will take "Why are .we doing this not include streel°sweeping. Beginning ,Ian. 3, residents
over street sweeping duties when we know-we can do it The -.money : '=paid to will be fined if they fail to obey
Monday. cheapen'". he asked. "I don't Nationwide will--be- recouped posted.signs alerting them to
Some say the work will be think that's fair td the public." with -revenue generated by what streets are off-limits and
superior to municipal services, Not everyone is so sure.city citations-issued to those.parked at what times.
but others_argue it comes zit a employees can outperform a -in the path:of the`:sweepers, . For information on the new
cost-of nearly twice the amount_ .private company, and compar- according to an Oct. 18 city restrictions,, call the , city's
-city- staffers say they'would ing •ther wo irk sliould .settle memo.- Infohne'of 374-4800, message
need to do the job. The source . any-_ doubts, City,Councilman. . :. Sullivan said he expects at 405. .
of that extra money? New Dave Sullivan said.
parking fines. The street sweeping con
For:the first time.since 1996, tract,:::.. which the council.:!
road cleaning will increase from- approved Oct. 18, is just-.one:
once to twice a month. .The example of the city's new phi-
work will be split between a city. ..example
of government—man-
work crew and a private co'm - aged competition, which aims
pany, Norwalk-based Nation- to make.government run more
1 ( DDD C.l 6vnCc.�J
'�. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION i' [f`t` Cii,` / sent
CA
TO: Ray Silver, City Administrator
FROM: Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public c Works
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM
DATE: December 22, 1999
Since November 1, 1999, staff has been tracking the number of warning citations issued and resolving problems associated with
the posting of certain residential tracts. The following activity summaries are for your information.
WARNING CITATIONS ISSUED
(NOVEMBER 1 — DECEMBER 17)
WEEK 11/05 11/12 11/19 11/26 NOV 12/03 12/10 12/17 DEC GRAND `
ENDING TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
5,837 3,498* 5,041 1,747* 16,123 3,341 4,676 3,442 14,901 31;0`24*'
* Includes holidays.
** This total far exceeds the estimated annual total of 20,000 violations per year. However, these are warnings only. Staff
anticipates a significant drop in these numbers beginning January 3, 2000.
� 1
IDENTIFIED TO DATE
C{POSTING PROBLEMS
TY OF
Huntington Townhomes Insufficient on-site parking. I&0n6,bW-n�rsFAs§odj5tion has agreed to
(Adams @ Bushard) sweep streets twice per month.*
At wx"4
Cambro Mfg Co. Insufficient on-site parking. anufacture'r'h""'a' s agreed to swe..e.p
(Huntington @ Clay) Tsmtreets twice per month.*
H.B. Community Clinic Insufficient on-site parking. Changed sweeping schedule.
(Beach @ Newland)
Ocean View Schools Insufficient on-site parking. Combination of cha nges in s..w.e.e ping
(Various locations) schedule and the construction of
temporary on-site parking facilities by the
school district.
Iry
anged sweeping schedules.
(Various locations) -7
Huntington Beach Elementary Schools ufficient on-site parking.
XNE
Seacliff residential tracts Short driveways, at some locations, Currently under investigation. Video
necessitate use of garages for parking. inspection, by staff, on sweeping day did
Garages currently used for other not reveal a serious problem.
^ Street 8VVe8DiOg is inspected by staff. Failure to provide @deOU2t8 level of service could necessitate sweeping by city.
RFB:bh
CC: Ronald E. Lowonbaro. Chief ofPolice
Floyd Edwards, Traffio/Aeno Bureau Cmdc
Karen Peterson, Parking Control Supervisor
Don Nnb|e, Maintenance Operations Manager
John Torvin. Street/Wastewater Maintenance Supervisor
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - 010� _
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TO: Mayor Pro Tern and City Council Members
FROM: Dave Garofalo, Mayor
SUBJECT: "H" ITEM - STREET SWEEPING AND PARKING1
CITATION ENFORCEMENT
DATE: August 7, 2000
ISSUE
Street sweeping and parking citation enforcement.
RECOMMENDATION -
If it takes more than 4 hours.-
rN.a
1. Report on parking citations issued in the six months prior to twice,per
month street sweeping (on a monthly basis), and citations issued eaclj:
month since we have instituted twice per month sweeping. :=
2. Report anticipated cost for second citywide sweeping and expected or
annual revenue from parking citations.
3. Coordinate this effort with the Managed Competition Committee.
c: Ray Silver, City Administrator
Connie Brockway, City Clerk
1
v
C
11/09/1999 09:35 714--375--5099 HB CITY YARD
11/09/1999 09: 35 714--375--5099 HB CITY YARD PAGE 01
Lim CITY OF NUNTINIMTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION )
murMNCVN BEACH
To: DARYIL SMITH, Acting Director of Public Works
From: GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney
Date: May 8, 1998
Subject: POSTING OF CITY STREETS FOR STREET SWEEPING
INDEX• Publig Property ano PubliiWorkg
Background: The Public Works Department has proposed a City-wide
street-sweeping program. The program would include the posting of signs
throughout the City and the imposition of fines to those vehicles parked in
violation of the signs. The staff and City Council have raised an issue as to what
authority is needed to implement the program.
Issue: Can the City.of Huntington Beach post signage City-wide
regarding street-sweeping and fine the owner of a vehicle parked in violation of
the signage?
Answer: Yes, the City of Huntington Beach may post signage City-
wide regarding street sweeping and impose a fine upon the owner of a vehicle in
violation of signage.
Analysis: Pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section
10,40.040(a), "[t]he Director of Public Works is authorized to maintain, by
appropriate signs . . . no parking areas. . . ." Further, subsection (b) provides that
when said signs are in place, "no operator of any vehicle shall stop, stand or park
such vehicle adjacent to any such . . . sign. . . ." A violation of this Chapter 10.40
is an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $100.00. H.B.M.C.
10.40.280,
Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 14.040.050 s.previously
established the no-parking area for the purposes of street-clee nin .
"No operator of any vehicle shall stop,stand, park or leave standin
such vehicle in any of the following places. . .
P Jmplop3Nsweeplsl6ma
11/09/1999 09:35 714--375--5099 HB CITY YARD PAGE 02
05/06/98 Page 2
'(g) On any street or highway where the use of suoh.otreet or
highway or a por ion thereof is npoessary for the cleaning, repair or
construction . . . and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or
interfere with such use or movement; provided that signs giving
notice of such no parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four
(24) hours prior to the effective time of such no parking."
The posting of signage regarding street-sweeping will allow the
enforcement of a previously defined no-parking area.
Conclusion:The implementation and enforcement of a street-sweeping program
with signage is consistent with the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and within
the discretion of the Director of Public Works. The enforcement of no-parking
zones, such as street-sweeping, is a valid exercise of the police power of the
City based on violation of the Municipal Code. It is not a surcharge based upon
any aspect of property therefore it is not subject to Proposition 218.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
Jmp/op1Nsuwep/$/W2$ 16
7//(,/17 -7
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH l/
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
FB
TO: Ray Silver, City Administrator 301330 3AljVd1S1N1W0d
H0d39 NME)NUNnH 3O Ail0
FROM: Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Works I �'
SUBJECT: Reinstatement of"Twice per Month" Street Sweeping ��� �
DATE: July 6, 1999
The July 6tn Council Agenda includes an RCA recommending approval of a street sweeping
services contract with Universal Street Sweeping, which will be subcontracting the work to
independent owner/operators.
The bid documents stipulate that the contractor shall pay prevailing wage rates. Universal
Street Sweeping believes that owner/ operators are exempt from prevailing wage standards;
however, our City Attorney's office, in consultation with the Department of Labor Relations,
disagrees. As of this date, the issue is unresolved; therefore, staff recommends that this item
be pulled from the agenda.
RFB-.sar
#35384
'�� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
TO: Ray Silver, City Administrator
FROM: Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Work
SUBJECT: Reinstatement of Twice Per Month Street Sweeping LIJ
c:) =-e
DATE: June 29, 1999
On January 19, 1999, the City Council approved the Implementation Report for a return to
"twice per month" street sweeping. Expanding street sweeping services from once to twice per
month creates an opportunity for a "side-by side" comparison between public and private
services. Accordingly, staff prepared bid specifications for such additional services.
On June 14, 199, two bids were reviewed for the reinstatement of"twice per month" street
sweeping. Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to Universal Street Sweeping. This
firm is a San Jose based company pursuing street sweeping projects in the area. Universal
Sweeping Services is scheduled to begin their work on Monday, August 2, 1999.
RFB/DN:sar
#35340
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAD. L,o)ee1v6cea- 4-oi-lee allieF
vr5tmjNe — P&I
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-02
Council/Agency Meeting Held: Y00'��
Deferred/Continued to:
Approved ❑ Concji#ionally Appro a DeniedPl�7!/ i Clerk's Signature
((oo ccoo Y?
Council Meeting Date: January 19, 1999 Department ID Number: PW99-02
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
BMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATORSdV
PREPARED BY: ROBERT F. BEARDSLEY, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC W-QRKS
RONALD E. LOWENBERG, CHIEF OF POLICE Rt
SUBJECT: APPROVE IMPLEMENTATION REPORT TO REINSTATE "TWICE
PER MONTH" STREET SWEEPING
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue:
On December 18, 1998, the Managed Competition Committee approved an Implementation
Report to reinstate "twice per month" street sweeping.
Funding Source:
The Implementation Report includes a program time line. Next month, pursuant to the time
line, staff will begin installation of the "No Parking" signs, the recruitment of four Parking
Control Officers and the purchase of four new vehicles. The estimated cost of these start-up
tasks is $196,000. These funds are not included in the approved 1998/1999 budget;
therefore, an appropriation of $196,000, from the city's General Fund balance, is necessary
prior to undertaking these tasks.
Recommended Actions:
1. Approve the Implementation Report for a return to "twice per month" street sweeping.
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to transfer $196,000, from the unappropriated General
Fund balance, into the following program accounts:
99RCA02.DOC -2- 01/07/99 1:32 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-02
PROGRAM ACCOUNTS
DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT
1). Public Works Traffic Maintenance (Signs) AA-PW-416-301 $100,000
2). Police Department Parking Enforcement (Vehicles) AA-PD-338-642 72,000
3). Police Department Parking Enforcement (Personnel) AA-PD-338 24,000*
TOTAL $196,000
*Will provide funding from date of implementation (August 1, 1999) to end of Fiscal Year
1998/1999 (September 30, 1999). Additional funding to continue program will be submitted
in Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Budget.
Alternative Action(s):
Forego approval of Implementation Report and continue current level of street sweeping
service.
Analysis:
As a result of substantial shortfalls in the City's 1996 General Fund revenues, citywide street
sweeping services were reduced from "twice per month" to "once per month." Subsequent to
this change, there have been numerous concerns expressed about stagnant, standing water
and the overall poor appearance of the city streets. Additionally, the quantity of debris
flowing into the city's storm drain system, including the Bolsa Chica, harbor waterways and
the ocean, have increased substantially.
At the May 18, 1998 City Council Meeting, staff was directed to provide the Managed
Competition Committee with an outline for the implementation of, and cost estimates for, a
return to "twice per month" street sweeping. After several meetings with the Managed
Competition Committee, staff drafted the following Implementation Report, which was
presented to, and approved by, the Managed Competition Committee on December 18,
1998.
IMPLEMENTATION REPORT
All public arterial and residential streets will be swept twice per month. Any additional
sweeping resources (i.e. unscheduled sweeping time) realized through the efficiencies of a
return to twice per month sweeping with parking restrictions will be used to clean median
islands along the arterial streets and the City parking lots, especially the Civic Center
locations as well as other City facilities.
99RCA02.DOC -3- 01/07/99 2:33 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-02
Cl ThyDEa` t�;,40, INGy' P4S�'I'IN�°G P:ROGRAM
Sign Locations
Unlike all previous street-sweeping programs, this program will include parking prohibitions
in all areas of the City on sweeping days. Signs with a four-hour restriction "window" will be
placed at the entrance to each residential tract. Tracts without the typical entrances (e.g.
the downtown area) will require individual street posting, with signs placed at approximately
150 foot intervals. Certain portions of the City's arterial street system may require
individual sign posting where homes front the street (e.g. the south side of Edinger Avenue,
west of Graham Street). Commercial and industrial areas will not be posted, as these
areas will be swept between the hours of 3:00 A.M. and 6:00 A.M. Residential streets,
within certain high-density developments (see Attachment A - Location Map), will be posted
for "alternate side" sweeping, which will allow for some parking availability at all times by
restricting parking on only one side on sweeping days.
Enforcement
Enforcement of the parking prohibitions will be performed by the Police Department.
Citations, costing $32 per violation, will be issued only when a vehicle is parked on the
street at the time of sweeping. This means that vehicles may be returned to the street as
soon as the sweeper has passed the parking location. Enforcement will not begin until the
Police Department has completed a "Public Education/Notification Program."
Public Education/Notification Program
The benefits of being able to sweep unobstructed streets should not be minimized. These
benefits will serve as the foundation of the City's public education/notification program.
The program will include news releases, HBTV 3 coverage, a short article in the "Sands"
publication, and an insert in the water bill mailing. Additionally, enforcement during the first
two months of service will be limited to "warnings only", with no citations issued.
Sweeping Route Schedules
Completed route schedules (see Attachment B) have been designed to insure maximum
productivity. They are based on prior, twice per month schedules as well as on an analysis
of an ongoing street sweeping field survey. Additionally, the route schedules coincide with
Rainbow Disposal's refuse pickup schedule; hence, streets typically will be swept the day
after that of refuse collection.
Program Costs
The estimated additional cost of twice per month sweeping, including "No Parking" signs,
enforcement personnel and vehicles is $488,000. Of this amount, $196,000 needs to be
99RCA02.DOC -4- 01/07/99 3:14 PM
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-02
budgeted now for the installation of signs, recruitment of four enforcement personnel and
the purchase of four new vehicles. Funding for these expenditures is not included in the
approved 1998/1999 budget. Therefore, an appropriation of $196,000 from the city's
General Fund balance is necessary prior to undertaking these tasks.
In March of 1998, Council adopted a motion stating that there shall be no additional
General Fund appropriations unless one of the following criteria is met:
1. It is an unanticipated emergency.
2. Costs required to implement labor negotiations.
3. New expenses that are offset by related new revenues.
It is anticipated that new revenues will accrue to pay for these costs from increased
program efficiencies.
Based on surveys of other Orange County cities, it is anticipated that at least 20,000
parking violation citations will be issued the first year, at a charge per citation of $32.00.
Based on an assumption of 20,000 citations, at $32.00 each, first year revenues may total
$640,000.
Although revenue from the first year should more than cover all additional program costs,
there is an expectation that revenues may "flatten" substantially over time, thereby limiting
this as primary source of program funding.
Labor Issues
Expanding street sweeping services creates an opportunity for a future Managed
Competition Process. However, during the initial expansion period numerous unknowns
exist which prevents an effective Managed Competition Process. These uncertainties
include:
1. How effective is the twice per month sweeping effort?
2. How do private versus public services compare in cost, effectiveness and efficiency?
3. Are there real benefits to a citywide parking prohibition program for street sweeping?
4. Are the revenues sufficient to sustain a twice per month sweeping program?
5. Are there real difficulties with the posting program and if so, can they be resolved?
To collect sufficient data and answers to these questions and to avoid organizational
disruption should the enforcement revenues be less than anticipated, the Managed
Competition Committee recommends that the initial street sweeping expansion be provided
through a 24-month "side-by-side" comparison using private sector services. During this
99RCA02.DOC -5- 01/07/99 1:32 PM
I
REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW99-02
24-month period City staff, the Municipal Employees Association, and the Managed
Competition Committee will collectively evaluate the information collected to determine the
best process for a future Managed Competition Process for a sustained expansion of street
sweeping services.
Time Line and Bidding
The following is a tentative time line for program implementation.
ACTION ITEM DESCRIPTION DATE
1. Draft Implementation Report approved by the Managed Competition 12/98
Committee
2. Final - pl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Final Implementation Report submitted to Council for approval 01/99
3. Begin installation of "covered" signs, hiring of additional police personnel 02/99
and order new police vehicles
4. Final bid documents reviewed by Managed Competition Committee 02/99
5. Bid documents to Council for approval and authorization to solicit bids 03/99
6. Document let for bids 04/99
- ----- - ----------- ------------ ------------------------------------------------------ ------------
- Bid opening and begin Public Education/Notification process 06199
- -------------------- ------
8. Low bid to Council for approval 06/99
9. Installation of city-wide signage complete 07/99
-- ---ro r m - n "Warning----rily- --or ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Begin Program and "Warning Only" enforcement 08/99
11. "Warning Only" enforcement complete 09/99
----------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Program Evaluation 10/99-09/01
Environmental Status:
N/A
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number No. D- • •
�r
A. Attachment A: Location Map of High-Density Developments
33'�
B Attachment B: Proposed Street Sweeping Route Schedules
C Fiscal Impact Statement
RCA Author: Robert F. Beardsley/Donald Noble
99RCA02.DOC -6- 01/07/99 1:32 PM
ATTACHMENT A
LOCATION MAP AT HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS
t
:~ •ram � •
FIND
• ' IP -
�� AMEN ..
�► mpg i
RAM,
�' � � .�.:�: •.��-.sty
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSED STREET SWEEPING ROUTE SCHEDULES
STREET SWEEPING SCHEDULE
When the district gets swept the perimeter gets swept also.
No sweeping on Pacific Coast Highway and Beach Boulevard.
1st/3RD MONDAY
ROUTE#1 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. -Alternate side Main St. to 141h St..
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. - 141h St.. to Goldenwest
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. -Alternate side Districts 165, 175
District 116, 117,166
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 157, 167,
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 176, 177, 186
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 187, 197
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. - District 136, 137, 147, 146
8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. - Lake to Main, Orange to P.C.H.
1st/3rd TUESDAY
ROUTE#1 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. -Alternate side Main St. to 141h St.
10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. - 1411 St. to Goldenwest
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 475, 476,
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 466, 467
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 444, 454, 464
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 474, 485, 486
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. - Islands: Warner, Slater, Talbert'
7:30 a.m. to 11:30a.m. -Alternate side 165, 175
1st/3rd WEDNESDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 327, 328, 329, 338, 339
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 339, 431, 441
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 282, 292, 412 North
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 271, 272
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District-293, 413
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 273, 283
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. -West Part of 262, 272, 282, 292
East Part of 251, 261, 281, 291
7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 281, 291, 319, 411, 421
1st/3rd THURSDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 158, 168
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 159
ROUTE #2 7:30 a.m. to 11-30 a.m. - District 139, 149
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 148
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 118, 128
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 138
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. - Islands: Bolsa Chica, Graham, Springdale,
Edwards `
1st/3rd FRIDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 434, 435
11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. - District 426
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 423, 424
11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. - District 425
No Parking Control Required
REC\Sweep Exhibit B
V7/99
Street Sweeping Schedule
page 2
2"d/4th MONDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 151, 162, 163, 173
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 174
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 155, 156
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 146
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 152, 153, 154
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 136, 164
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. - Islands: Bolsa, McFadden, Edinger, Heil
2"d/4th TUESDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 446, 456
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 447, 457
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 443, 453
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 463, 473
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 455, 465
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 445
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. - Islands: Garfield, Yorktown, Adams, Indianapolis,
Atlanta, Hamilton, Banning
2"d/41h WEDNESDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 253, 262, 263
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 264, City Yard
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 251, 252, 261
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 232, 241, 242
ROUTE#3 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - Alternate side/South half 412, 422, 432
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 462, Alternate side 442, 452
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. - Islands: Goldenwest, Ellis, Sea Point, Palm
West of Goldenwest: Garfield, Yorktown, Adams
2"d/4th THURSDAY
ROUTE#1 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 169, 179
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 189, 199
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 188, 198
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - District 178
ROUTE#3 7:30 p.m. to 11:30 a.m. - Alternate side/South half 412, 422, 432
11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. - Alternate side 442, 452
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. - Islands: Ward, Brookhurst, Bushard, Magnolia,
Newland
2"d/4th F R I DAY
ROUTE#2 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 436, 437
11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. - District 427, 428
ROUTE#4 3:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. - Goldenwest, Main St., Pier Plaza '
7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - District 433
No Parking Control Required
REC\Sweep Exhibit B
117/99
ATTACHMENT C
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICA TION
To: Ray Silver, City Administrator
From: John Reekstin, Director of Administrative Services
Subject: FIS 98-14 Approval of City's Street Sweeping Program
January 7, 1999
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been
prepared for "Approval of City's Street Sweeping Program".
If the City Council approves this action, (total appropriation $196,000)
the estimated undesignated General Fund Balance at September 30,
1999 will be reduced to $7,868,875.
John Reekstin,
/ Director of Administrative Services
�„dopted Current
Fund Balance General Fund Budget Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance 10/1/98(unaudited) $ 5,869,150 $ 10,235,000
Plus: Estimated Revenue 107,860,642 107,860,642
Less: Estimated Expenditures (109,890,397) (109,890,397)
Less Pending/Approved FIS's (140,270)
Less: FIS 99-14 - (196,000)
Estimated 9/30/99 Balance $ 3,839,395 $ 7,868,975
Estimated General Fund Balance at September 30, 1999
$9,000,000
$8,000,000 -
$7,000,000
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
ys:
$4,000,000 0`
$3,000,000 �- "o,
$7,868,975
$2,000,000 `__„,
$3,839,395
ADOPTED BUDGET CURRENT ESTIMATE
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: APPROVE STREET SWEEPING IMPLEMENTATION
REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 19, 1999
RCA ATTACHMENTS
_,;;d:, STATUS
-" -;,'hC��lVCv3d33d3i,i:"• - .--'`x
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Attached
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
». ;a
=33: EXPLANATION'FOR'MISSING''ATTACHMENTS' `
»dxd REVIEWED "'` REdd: �3URNED E�;ORWARDED
Administrative Staff ( ) ( )
Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( )
City Administrator (Initial)
City Clerk ( )
EXPLANATION"FO'R'RETURN OF ITEM:
d�
"9(Below • . For
RCA Author: Robert F. Beardsley/Donald Noble
I
Street Sweeping Inv° -mentation Report January 19, 1999
W
CITY of HUNTINGTON BEA CHCr
Street Sweeping 3 Cr
WC, U�}`
Implementation Report �;
LO
Z O
Cr
Cc w0W
U-<WU-
,,_z
oW z
Wo.Tl00
wmz U
„ .. (.)aM
?.: LUZO
Yt'ry
O
1
Previous Sweeping Schedule
Prior to 1996
® All streets and median islands were swept
twice per month
® Public parking lots were swept on months
with a "5th week"
® Limited number of posted "no parking" areas
® Alternate side sweeping limited to downtown
2
Public Works Department Item #F-1
Street Sweeping In -,nentation Report January 19, 1999
Current Sweeping Schedule
Since 1996
® All streets and median islands swept once per
month
• Public parking lots left unswept
® An increase in residents' requests for "no
parking" areas
® Alternate side sweeping limited to downtown 3
Proposed Program
Goals
® Reduce areas of stagnant water accumulation
® Decrease quantity of debris in the storm drain
& waterway systems
® Improve overall appearance of streets
® Increase program effectiveness by requesting
removal of parked vehicles
4
Public Works Department Item#F-I
19 Jan 1999 4: 24P FAX: PAGE 1
C�
iq
p.w.o
4
a
-4m ...4
C.-
�E C-�
3.- 1:7)
IAJj Ce
Tee
an
I� , 01-19-99 03: 33Pb4 F01
t 5� /_L4y't.. ,DPtc3 �r
Council/Agency Meeting Held: 5-/Y — 58
Deferred/Continued to:
Approved ® Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied _6
7-0 City Clerk's Signature
Council Meeting Date: May 18, 1998 Department 1D Number: PW-98-048
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR ACTION _
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCI ;,
SUBMITTED BY: RAYSILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATORG2,ea =-:c 2]
100 r` ry
..l
EPARED BY: DARYL D. SMITH, ACTING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ti
SUBJECT: PROVIDE DIRECTION ON A REVISED STREET SWEEPING ROGR.M
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: 1) Should the City establish a program to post street sweeping schedules
_City-wide and cite parked vehicles that violate the posted schedules? 2) Should the street sweeping
schedule be increased to twice per month?
Funding Source: General Fund. The enforcement program will generate revenue from parking
citations. Per City Council adopted policy, the expense would be offset by new revenue.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
Direct staff to provide the Managed Competition Committee with a program for implementation of,
and cost estimates for, returning to twice per month street sweeping; and posting of the entire City to
prohibit on-street pa king on the days of street sweeping.
irieludiny revenues
Alternative Action(s): Motion to:
1) Direct staff to proceed with the signage program, but do not address the increased sweeping
schedule; or
2) Direct staff to proceed with the increased sweeping schedule program, but do not address the
signage program; or
3) Direct staff to postpone further activity on the subject of street sweeping.
Analysis:
In 1996, the City's street sweeping service was reduced from twice to once per month. Subsequent
to this change, there have been numerous complaints about stagnant standing water and the overall
appearance of the City streets. Additionally, the quantity of debris flowing into the City's storm drain
system including the harbor waterways, the ocean and Bolsa Chica Bay has increased substantially.
STSWRCA.DOC
Direction on Revised Street Sweeping Program
May 18, 1998
Page 2
On February 17, 1998, Council directed staff to prepare a report on the cost of returning to twice per
month sweeping and the possibility of posting no street parking, for certain times, throughout the City
to improve the effectiveness of the program.
Staff submitted a Street Sweeping Report, see attachment #1, to Council on March 9, 1998. As
noted in the report, increasing the frequency of sweeping to twice per month will insure cleaner
streets, eliminate the accumulation of stagnant standing water and reduce the amount of debris
flowing into the City's storm drain system. Additionally, the recommended Police Department
enforcement of a city-wide posted parking program would permit sweeping of the entire street,
thereby greatly improving the efficiency of the program. Council concerns regarding the report
include: what have other cities done with the issue of posting streets; is an enforcement program
legal without voter approval; what is the long term level of funding from an enforcement program;
what are the posting impacts on "under parked' areas; how many estimated citations would be
issued per year; and is once per month sweeping, with posting, as effective as twice per month?
Based on a March, 1998 survey of seven neighboring cities (see attachment #2), Street Sweeping
Operator Log Data** collected for the month of April, 1998 (see attachment #3) and a legal opinion
from the City Attorney (see attachment #4). Staff has responded to each of these concerns as noted
on attachment#5.
Based on a review of all additional information obtained to date, it's apparent that the street
sweeping schedule should be increased to twice per month and that the effectiveness of the program
would be improved by initiating a city-wide posting and parking enforcement program.
Although increasing the frequency of sweeping and posting the street will not solve existing
infrastructure problems, (i.e. damaged curb and gutter, etc.); these actions will improve the
appearance of the city and eliminate stagnant, odiferous standing water, leaves and litter in the
streets and gutters. Therefore, the Acting Director of Public Works recommends:
That Council direct staff to provide the Managed Competition Committee with a program for
implementation of, and cost estimates for, returning to twice per month street sweeping; and posting
of the entire City to prohibit on-street parking on the days of street sweeping.
** On April 1, 1998, Street Sweeping Operators began logging information about the existing once
per month program. Based on the first month of data it's apparent that: City-wide there is an
excessive number of cars parked on streets during sweeping operations, the number of cars left on
the street in the posted areas is substantially less than the non-posted areas and consideration will
have to be given to the posting of high density developments with limited on street parking in a
method similar to that of Long Beach. ( i.e. posting sides of the street for alternate day sweeping.)
STSWRCA.DOC
Direction on Revised Street Sweeping Program
May 18, 1998
Page 3 - -
Environmental Status: Not applicable -
Attachments:
1. Street Sweeping Report
2. Survey of Orange County Cities Street Sweeping and Enforcement Programs
3. Operators Log Data
4. City Attorney's Opinion regarding posting
5. Response to Council Concerns
t DDS/LD
STSWRCA.DOC
jim
CITY OF HUNTING- TON BEACH
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 0
VIA: Ray Silver, Acting City AdministratorFROM: Daryl D. Smith Actin Director of Public Works \7
rY g , ,R 6 1S�8
SUBJECT: Response to City Council Request for CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Modification of the Street Sweeping Program ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
DATE: March 4, 1998
At the February 17 meeting, City Council directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation
concerning returning to twice a month street sweeping City wide. The report should include the cost of
changing back to twice a month as well as whether or not any increased street sweeping can be
performed by a private contractor. Staff was also directed to investigate the possibility of posting no
parking at certain times, throughout the City, to improve the effectiveness of sweeping.
1. What is the cost of returning the sweeping program to twice a month?
Staff estimates that the City's additional cost would be approximately $200,000 per year. This
amount includes personnel, equipment, fuel and sweeper maintenance.
The existing Street Cleaning Program (520) includes hazardous materials clean-up, removal of
trash, and abandoned items from streets and alleys, and street sweeping. The 1997/98 budget
for the program is $561,000.
2. Can the additional service be provided by a contractor?
Yes. There are several companies that provide street sweeping services. Staff will prepare
specifications that will be reviewed by an outside authority. The bid documents will then be
submitted to the Managed Competition Committee for approval. Once approved, the City will
request proposals and bids for service. In keeping with the managed competition program, staff
will also prepare a bid for performing the additional service. The sealed bid will be submitted to
Purchasing prior to bid openings.
3. What would be the cost of posting and enforcing signs that prohibit parking on street
sweeping days?
To determine the cost of a posting and enforcement program, staff outlined a basic policy. Signs
would be posted only at the entrance to each residential tract. Downtown and commercial areas
would be posted on each street. The enforcement vehicle would follow the sweeper and cite
violators. Public Works staff would hire four temporary workers, at a cost of$70,000 annually, to
issue citations to illegally parked vehicles. Fuel and maintenance for enforcement vehicles would
be approximately $5,000. In addition, initial costs for signs, poles and enforcement vehicles
would be approximately $135,000.
0030641.01
Modification of the Street Sweeping Program
March 4, 1998
Page 2
4. What is the proiected revenue for an enforced City wide no parking on sweeping days
program?
Under the outlined program, only vehicles illegally parked in the street at the'time of actual sweeping
will be cited. Revenues will be determined by the amount of the citation, and the number of
violations issued. The, current cost of a no parking violation in Huntington Beach is $32. In the City
of Garden Grove, where the posted area is comparable in size to Huntington Beach, a similar
program generates approximately 25,000 citations annually.
Below are some alternative citation rates which generate different levels of revenue. Projections
assume 20,000 citations annually, however, revenues will vary according to the actual number of
violations.
Citation Amount Estimated Annual Revenue
$14 per citation $275,000
$28 per citation $563,000
$32 per citation $640,000
5. How would this program increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the street sweeping
service?
The sweepers will be able to access an entire street rather than going around parked vehicles.
Street gutters and catch basins will be cleaner and have fewer maintenance problems. The storm
drain system will work more efficiently to remove water from the streets. Residents will benefit from
cleaner streets and less debris flowing into the storm drain system, and ultimately the harbour,
estuary and ocean. More thorough and frequent sweeping will decrease stagnant water
accumulation, thus reducing odors and pest problems.
Summary
The estimated costs of sweeping twice a month and City-wide no parking enforcement, including
personnel, equipment, maintenance, and signage are:
Current Sweeping Program $300,000
One Additional Day per Month 200,000
Enforcement of No Parking Signs 75,000
First Year Start-up Costs 135,000
Program Total $710,000
Accounting and budget procedures will be established to monitor program revenue and
expenditures. The process outlined above can be the basis for an effective and efficient street
sweeping program. Upon City Council direction, staff will draft and submit program policies and ,
procedures for City Council review and approval.
STREET SVV'--tPIHG POSTED AR S
114 117 Trj —
126 127 128
E
�® 137 138 139
a
146 147 148 149 241
152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 251 252
\ s f, FMe,
Y hF ) -
i1 F 2 1`63 164 165 166 167 168 169 261 262 263 ?64
0
7 174 175 176 177 178 179 271 27 3�M
172 +2
183 884 185 1 187 188 189 281 282 283
194 ' 195 196 1 9-N 198 199 291 Z292mm 293
315, 316 317 31 319 411 4� 413
328 329 42 42 423 424 425 426 427 4 8
i
338 3 1 ,433 434 435 436 437 438
� ' 44 144F 444 447: i
34.8 '. 'r 445 446 %
359\\ 45 453 454 455 456 4
NIrY
46 462 463 464 465 466 67
472 3 474 475 476 ;477
POSTED 485
AREA_ 495 96
rmn
w ,
r�, `ems �. , �, � ... e � ,: �<.�t;A• �'� X;�• :r:�s`:'
v
a
sTY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC
' POSTED STREET SWEEPING
STREET NAME TIME AREA STREET NAME TIME AREA
BOUNTY 8AM - 3PM 152 SARU 8AM - 3PM 263
TISBURY 8AM - 3PM 153 TAMARU 8AM - 3PM 263
NIANTIC 8AM - 3PM 153 MINORU 8AM - 3PM 263
MARUFFA 8AM - 3PM 153 KEELSON 8AM - 2PM 272
LADONA 8AM - 3PM 153 KOLEDO 8AM - 2PM 272
COTIUT 8AM - 3PM 153 JACQUELYN 8AM - 2PM 272
BARNSTABLE 8AM - 3PM 153 DAIRYVIEW 8AM - 2PM 272
LEONARD 8AM - 3PM 153 WAGON 8AM - 2PM 272
MISTRAL 8AM - 3PM 153 CYPRESS 8AM - 2PM 272
CAROUSEL 8AM - 3PM 153 SYCAMORE 8AM - 2PM 272
WAYFARER 8AM - 3PM 154 BELSITO 8AM - 2PM 272
HUMBOLDT 8AM - 3PM 154 EMERALD 8AM - 2PM 272
ARDSLEY 8AM - 3PM 154 OAK 8AM - 2PM 272
WELLINGTON 8AM - 3PM 162 FIR 8AM - 2PM 272
MELVILLE 8AM - 3PM 162 ASH 8AM - 2PM 272
BROADWAY 8AM - 3PM 162 ELM 8AM - 2PM 272
BAYVIEW 8AM - 3PM 162 KRISTIN 8AM - 2PM 272
INTREPID 8AM - 3PM 162 BARTON 8AM - 2PM 272
ADMIRALTY 8AM - 3PM 162 VANDYKE 8AM - 2PM 272
CHANNEL 8AM - 3PM 162 VALENCIA 7AM - 3PM 273
PEALE 8AM - 3PM 162 MARSEILLE 7AM - 3PM 273
MALDEN 8AM - 3PM 162 POLDER 7AM - 3PM 273
MARIANA 8AM - 3PM 162 REMBRANDT 7AM - 3PM 273
FALKLAND 8AM - 3PM 162 EDAM 7AM - 3PM 273
EASTER 8AM - 3PM 162 AMSTERDAM 7AM - 3PM 273
DEVON 8AM - 3PM 162 BLAYLOCK 7AM - 3PM 273
SOMERSET 8AM - 3PM 163 GRANADA 7AM - 3PM 273
WANDERER 8AM - 3PM 163 BARCELON 7AM - 3PM 273
CAROUSEL 8AM - 3PM 163 ROTTERDAM 7AM - 3PM 273
ENSIGN 8AM - 3PM 163 KAMPEN 7AM - 3PM 273
NALU 8AM - 3PM 163 HAGUE 7AM-3PM 273
BOLERO 8AM - 3PM 163 BARON 8AM-2PM 282
SEA WITCH 8AM - 3PM 163 BENJAMIN 8AM-3PM 283
KAMALII 8AM - 3PM 163 BRITTANY 8AM-3PM 283
FINISTERRE 8AM - 3PM 163 EL ARROYO 8AM-3PM 283
LEGEND 8AM - 3PM 163
BARUNA 8AM - 2PM 163
ROBIN\SWEEP 1
5/11/98
STREET NAME _ TINXI; AREA STREET Nam' TIME AREA
ALBERTA 7AM - PM 292 16TH 10AM- 2PM 451
CARNABY 7AM - 3PM 292 17TH 10AM- 2PM 451
YUKON 7AM - 3PM 292 18TH 10AM- 2PM 451
DANTON 7AM - 3PM 292 19TH 10AM- 2PM 451
APPLEBY 7AM - 3PM 292 20TH 10AM- 2PM 451
FRANKLIN 7AM - 3PM 292 21ST 10AM- 2PM 451
STEEP 7AM - 3PM 292 22ND 10AM- 2PM 451
PAMMY 7AM - 3PM 292 WALNUT 8AM -10AM 451
DELAWARE 7AM - 3PM 292 OLIVE, 6TH-13TH 8AM -10AM 451
MANITOBA 7AM - 3PM 292 ORANGE, 6TH-13TH 8AM -10AM 451
GASPE 7AM - 3PM 292 ACACIA, 6TH-13TH 8AM -10AM 451
5TH 349 PALM, 6TH-13TH 8AM -10AM 451
AMBERLEAF 7AM - 3PM 412 PECAN, 6TH-13TH 8AM -10AM 451
VALLEY 8AM - 3PM 413
6TH '8AM -10AM 441 WALNUT 10AM- 2PM 349
N. NEW BRITAIN 8AM - 2PM 443 OLIVE, 14TH-22ND 10AM- 2PM 349
S. NEW BRITIAN 8AM - 2PM 443 ORANGE, 14TH-22ND 10AM- 2PM 349
CAPE COTTAGE 8AM - 2PM 443 ACACIA, 14TH-22ND 10AM- 2PM 349
CAPE NEWBURY 8AM - 2PM 443 PALM, 14TH-22ND 10AM- 2PM 349
NORFOLK 8AM - 2PM 443 PECAN, 14TH-22ND 10AM- 2PM 349
MILLBRIDGE 8AM - 2PM 443
BOOTHBAY 8AM - 2PM 443
NORTHPORT 8AM - 2PM 443
PORT GREENWICH 8AM - 2PM 443
ORANGE BOTH SIDES
5TH - 6TH 8AM -12PM 451
ORANGE WEST SIDE FLORIDA 8AM -12PM 432
5TH - 6TH 8AM -12PM 451 JAY 8AM -12PM 432
OLIVE NORTH SIDE TIMBER 8AM - 3PM 412
5TH - 6TH 8AM -12PM 451 THOR 8AM - 3PM 138
7TH 8AM -10AM 451 APOLLO 8AM - 3PM 138
8TH 8AM -10AM 451 ATLAS 8AM - 3PM 138
9TH 8AM -10AM 451 SABRE 8AM - 3PM 138
10TH 8AM -10AM 451
11 TH 8AM -10AM 451
12TH 8AM -10AM 451
13TH 8AM -10AM 451
14TH 10AM- 2PM 451
15TH 10AM- 2PM 451
ROBIN\SWEEP 2
5/11/98
Eye T19
7
Street Sweeping Programs
�-- Parking Restrictions and Enforcement
Local Cities
Huntington Beach Public Works Department
Huntington Beach Costa Mesa Cypress Fountain Valley Fullerton Garden Grove Irvine Santa Ana
Service provider City City City City City Contract Both City
Frequency (Res) 1/month Weekly Weekly 2/month Weekly 2/month 2/month Weekly
Frequency (Com) 1/month Weekly Weekly 2/month Weekly 2/mo or weekly 2/month 2/month
Frequency (Art) 1/month Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly 2/month 2/month
Res st. posting 10% 30% 100% 100% 10% 100% 0% 100%
Hour limits 4 2 4 4 4 8 -- 8
Com. posting Downtown No No No No All All
Com. sweep hrs Day Night Day Night Night 5-9 am Night Night
Citations issued Some Some All All All All - All
Enforcement dept. Police Police Police Police Police Pub. Works - Police
Cost of citation $32 $34 $25 $24 $20 $20 - $41
Annual revenue N/Available N/Available $106,500 $115,000 N/Available $500,000 $ - $800,000
Prepared by the City of Huntington Beach Linda Daily 714-536-5599
Public Works Department 3/98
5/4/98 stswsurvey.xls Survey Results
,� mn eras , IfZl
ATTACHMENT # 3
The following information has been taken from detailed data gathered via a field survey of the
City's Street Sweeping Program. The data covers residential street sweeping activities for the
month of April 1998.
Residential Miles Swept:
In posted areas: 144
In non-posted areas: 900
Total miles: 1,044
Cars Passed by weeper:
Total cars: Cars per mile:
In posted areas: 710 In posted areas: 4.9
In non-posted areas: 14,775 In non-posted areas: 16.4
Total cars: 15,485
There is a concern about the number of cars parked in the high density areas. The following is a
comparison of two non-posted areas:
Non-posted Area: Cars Passed: Cars/mile:
High density (area from Beach to Newland, Slater to Talbert): 203 50.8"
Low density (area from Atlanta to Indianapolis, Brookhurst to Bushard): 142 9.5
"The posting of this or similar areas should include the consideration of`'alternate day"posting.
The following is a comparison of the amount of debris picked up by the sweepers within two
areas with similar landscape surroundings.
Area: Lbs./mile:
Posted (area from Beach to Newland, Adams to Indianapolis): 208.1
Non-posted (area from Magnolia to Newland,Atlanta to Hamilton): 138.7
Based on this preliminary information, sweepers are able to pick up more debris from the curb
and gutters in posted areas.
lo
..........
CITY 1 T lEaCa
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To: DARYL SMITH, Acting Director of Public Works
From: GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney
Date: May 6, 1998
Subject: POSTING OF CITY STREETS FOR STREET SWEEPING
INDEX: Public Property and Public Works
Background: The Public Works Department has proposed a City-wide
street-sweeping program. The program would include the posting of signs
throughout the City and the imposition of fines to those vehicles parked in
violation of the signs. The staff and City Council have raised an issue as to what
authority is needed to implement the program.
Issue: Can the City of Huntington Beach post signage City-wide
regarding street-sweeping and fine the owner of a vehicle parked in violation of
the signage?
Answer: Yes, the City of Huntington Beach may post signage City-
wide regarding street-sweeping and impose a fine upon the owner of a vehicle in
violation of signage.
Analysis: Pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section
10.40.040(a), "[t]he Director of Public Works is authorized to maintain, by
appropriate signs . . . no parking areas. . . ." Further, subsection (b) provides that
when said signs are in place, "no operator of any vehicle shall stop, stand or park
such vehicle adjacent to any such . . . sign. . . ." A violation of this Chapter 10.40
is an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $100.00. H.B.M.C.
10.40.280.
Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 14.040.050 has previously
established the no-parking area for the purposes of street-cleaning.
"No operator of any vehicle shall stop,stand, park or leave standing
such vehicle in any of the following places. . .
J m p/o p i n/sweep/5/6/98
05/06/98 Page 2
(g) On any street or highway where the use of such street or
highway or a portion thereof is necessary for the cleaning, repair or
construction . . . and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or
interfere with such use or movement; provided that signs giving
notice of such no parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four
(24) hours prior to the effective time of such no parking."
The posting of signage regarding street-sweeping will allow the
enforcement of a previously defined no-parking area.
Conclusion: The implementation and enforcement of a street-sweeping program
with signage is consistent with the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and within
the discretion of the Director of Public Works. The enforcement of no-parking
zones, such as street-sweeping, is a valid exercise of the police power of the
City based on violation of the Municipal Code. It is not a surcharge based upon
any aspect of property therefore it is not subject to Proposition 218.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
J mp/opi n/sweep/5/6/98
a..
v
".a
"' ��`... :x. :_min...., �„ ::.. ,,N3;� •:a.,,.:�\
,•;tea,,, ���
s>r
< a.... •,tea ,�'��;. � ' .���:..
_\ar
�c.
STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM
RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS OF MARCH 9, 1998
• What have other cities done with the issue of posting streets?
Based on a recent survey of neighboring cities; Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden
Grove and Santa Ana have posted all residential areas "No Parking" on street
sweeping days. Costa Mesa has posted 30% of the residential community and
Fullerton 10%. Irvine has not posted the residential areas of town.
• Is an enforcement program legal without voter approval?
Yes, pursuant to a legal opinion from the City Attorney, residential street parking can
be limited by signage and enforced without voter approval.
• What is the long-term level of funding from an enforcement program?
Information from the applicable cities surveyed, indicates that revenues from an
enforced posted "No Parking" program are the highest the first year and then level
off by the third year.
• What are the posting impacts on "under-parked"developments?
Posting programs can have a substantial impact on residents in "under-parked"
developments. Therefore, a posting program should include serious consideration
of"alternate day" posting.
• How many estimated citations would be issued per year?
Based on detailed data gathered via a field survey of the City's Street Sweeping
Program, it has been determined that an average of 4.931 cars per mile, in posted
areas, are by-passed by City sweepers. Knowing that we sweep 1,044 miles of
residential streets per month, it can then be estimated that monthly citations could
total 5,148 (4.931 cars per mile x 1,044 miles swept = 5,148 citations).
• Is once per month sweeping, with posting, as effective as twice per month
without posting?
Posting could significantly reduce the numbers of vehicles left on the street; thereby
improving the efficiency of once per month sweeping. However, once per month
sweeping will not mitigate the stagnant water or debris that accumulates with this
level of service. It is the opinion of staff that posting the streets, and sweeping twice
per month, will provide the best results.
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: Motion to Provide Direction on a Revised Street Sweeping
Program
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 18, 1998
RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS
REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED
Administrative Staff ( ) ( )
Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( )
City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( G1 )
City Clerk ( )
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
Only)(Belom�Space For City Clerk's Use
RCA Author: Linda Daily
Facsimile Cover Sheet
To: City Clerk
Company:
Phone:
Fax: +1 (714) 374-1557
From: Robert Polkow
Company:
Phone: +1 (714) 962-4810
Fax: +1(714) 962-4810
Date: 5/16/98 S
Pages including thisCO
cover page: 1 ��",.
C
Comments: - s
AUENDI2ED ITEM F-1
Regarding agenda item F-1, please remember the inconviences caused by
the cable company when they installed the sidewalk master junction
boxes . As I recall several homeowners complained at the council
meetings that the location of the boxes obstructed side.yard entrance .
If the poles, provided for the sighs, are installed without regard to
the homeowners current or probable future plans the same complaints
will - ,justifiably, be voiced .
I think the objective of the signs can be. achieved by notification to
affected neighborhoods with Correspoondence, possibly with the 14uncipal
Services Statement, thus alleviating a needless expenditure of the sign
installation cost . The inst.a.11at.ioii of these :signs could lead to an
eventual forest. of sighs for other various reasons that are not only
unsightly but cheapen the look of any neighborhood .
Respectfully:
ROBERT A. Polkow, 21772 Oceanview Lane, HB, 92646 714 962-4810
05-16-'_18 09 : 4SP.M Pill
EB CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
--DARYL SMITH,-Acting Director of Public Works
FROM: GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney
DATE: May 18, 1998
—SUBJECT: [REVISED] RLS 98-161; Posting of City Streets for Street Sweepings wr,,
INDEX: Public Property and Public Works - -- ,.> -",
o T�f I
- ------- Background: - The Public Works Department has proposed a City-wide,,stre t-
sweeping program. The program would include the posting of signs throughput t&e City
and the imposition of fines to those vehicles parked in violation of the signs. -The staff
has raised a question regarding the amount of signage necessary to enforce the no-
parking area.
Issue: Is the posting of signage at only the entrance of the tracts sufficient
- - to enforce the no-parking area throughout the tract?
Answer: Yes, pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22507.6, the
posting of signage at the entrance of tracts is sufficient for
enforcement purposes; however, it is insufficient to allow
enforcement pursuant to the Huntington Beach Municipal Code
Section 10.40.050(g).
_._ Analysis: California Vehicle Code Section 22507.6 provides, in part:
Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit or restrict the
parking or standing of vehicles on designated streets or highways, or
portions thereof, for the purpose of street sweeping. . . No such ordinance
or resolution shall be effective until the street or highway, or portion thereof,
[has_ been] posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to the street a
notice not less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less
---than one inch in height setting forth the day or days and hours parkin is _.
prohibited.
The section further defines "entrance" as "the intersection of any street or streets
comprising an area of restricted parking for street-sweeping purposes on the same day or
- ------ ------------------------------------
----- -- ------------- -- -----
jmp/k/memo/sweeping/5/18/98
days and hours with another street or highway not subject to such a parking restriction, or
subject to parking restrictions on different days and hours."
Pursuant to the Vehicle Code, a violation of the no-parking prohibition will constitute an
infraction. The-attached fine or penalty is $ 32.00. - - - — -
- Alternatively, Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 10.040.050(g) provides that
"any street or highway where the use of such street or highway or a portion thereof is _
necessary for the cleanings repair or construction" is a no-parking area. However, the
no-parking area is only effective ". . . provided that signs giving notice of such no
parking are erected or placed at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the effective time
of such parking." Pursuant to-Huntington Beach Municipal Code Se"ection 10-.40.040, -- --- -
"[t]he Director of Public Works is authorized to maintain, by appropriate signs . . .no
parking area. . .". Once posted, it is a violation of the Municipal Code to "stop, stand or
park such vehicle adjacent to any such. . .sign. . .". A violation of this section of the
Municipal Code is deemed an infraction and the attached maximum fine or penalty is
$100.00.
Conclusion: The placement of the no-parking signage only at the entrances of the
- tracts will be sufficient to allow enforcement of California Vehicle Code Section 22507.6.
Additional signage throughout the tract would also allow enforcement of Huntington
Beach Municipal Code Section 10.40.050.
GAIL HUTTON,
City Attorney
jmp/Umemo/sweeping/5/18/98
Page
rT-ST-ANN - CA VEHICLE s 22507.6
is Ann.Cal.Vehicle Code S 22507.6
> WEST'S ANNOTATED CALIFORNIA CODES
> VEHICLE CODE
> DIVISION 11. RULES OF THE ROAD
> CHAPTER 9. STOPPING, STANDING, AND PARKING
Copr. C West Group 1998. All rights reserved.
Current through 1997 portion of 1997-98 Reg. Sess. and lst Ex. Sess.
S> 22507.6. Local regulation; street sweeping; commercial vehicles; signs
Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit or restrict the parking or
standing of vehicles on designated streets or highways, or portions thereof, for the purpose of
street sweeping. No ordinance or resolution relating to the parking or standing of commercial
vehicles in a residential district shall be effective with respect to any commercial vehicle
making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, or merchandise from or to any building or
structure located on the restricted street or highway, or for the purpose of delivering
materials to be used in the repair, alteration, remodeling, or reconstruction of any building
or structure for which a building permit has previously been obtained. No such ordinance or
resolution shall be effective
until the street or highway, or portion thereof, has been sign-posted in..accordance with the
uniform standards and specifications of the Department of Transportation, or local authorities
have caused to be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to the street a notice not
less than 17 inches by 22 inches in size, with lettering not less than one inch in height,
setting forth the day or days and hours parking is prohibited. As used in this section,
"entrance" means the intersection of any street or streets comprising an area of restricted
parking for street-sweeping purposes on the same day or days and hours with another street or
highway not subject to such a parking restriction, or subject to parking restrictions on
%' fferent days and hours.
Copr. (C) West 1998 No Claim-to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works
10.40.040--10.40.0500) Huntington Beach Municipal Code
10.40.040 Zones and areas maintained.
(a) The Director of Public Works is authorized to maintain, by appropriate signs or by paint upon
the curb surface, all no stopping zones, no parking areas, and restricted parking areas, as
defined and described in this title.
(b) When said curb markings or signs are in place, no operator of any vehicle shall stop,.stand or
park such vehicle adjacent to any such legible curb marking or sign in violation of any of the
provisions of this chapter. (255-2/23,322-1/29,692A-9/58, 1051-5/64)
10.40.050 No parking areas. No operator of any vehicle shall stop, stand, park or leave
standing such vehicle in any of the following places, except when necessary to avoid conflict with
other traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer or other authorized officer, or
traffic signal:
(a) On either side of any street between the projected property lines of any public walk, public
steps, street or thoroughfare terminating at such street, when such area is indicated by
appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
(b) Within any divisional island unless authorized and clearly indicated with appropriate signs or
markings;
(c) In any area where the Director of Public Works or Director of Community Development
determines that the parking or stopping of a vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or would
endanger life or property when such area is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint
upon the curb surface;
(d) In any area established by resolution of the Council as a no parking area, when such area is
indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface;
(e) Upon, along or across any railway track in such manner as to hinder, delay or obstruct the
movement of any car traveling upon such track;
(f) In any area where the parking or stopping of any vehicle would constitute a traffic hazard or
would endanger life or property;
(g) On any street or highway where the use of such street or highway or a portion thereof is
necessary for the cleaning, repair or construction of the street or highway or the installation of
underground utilities or where the use of the street or highway or any portion thereof is
authorized for a purpose other than the normal flow of traffic or where the use of the street or
highway or any portion thereof is necessary for the movement of equipment, articles or
structures of unusual size, and the parking of such vehicle would prohibit or interfere with
such use or movement; provided that signs giving notice of such no parking are erected or
placed at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the effective time of such no parking,
(h) At any place within twenty (20) feet of a point on the curb immediately opposite the mid-
block end of a safety zone, when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint
upon the curb surface;
(i) At the place within twenty (20) feet of a crosswalk at an intersection when such place is
indicated by appropriate signs or by red paint upon the curb surface except that a bus may
stop at a designated bus stop;
0) Within twenty (20) feet of the approach of any traffic signal, stop sign or official electric
flashing device, when such place is indicated by appropriate signs or by.red paint upon the
curb surface;
2/97
CITY of
Street Sweeping
l
Program ,
vi
L - " VEL ol
s Prior to 1996, streets were swept twice per
month
Since 1996, streets are being swept once per
month
PROBLEMS TH CURRENT
PROGRAM
Receive complaints on:
— Overall appearance of city streets -
- Stagnant standing water
• Residents on 100 streets have petitioned the City to repair
damaged curbs and gutters
• Last summer 315 tons of debris was removed from city
catch basins prior to El Nino
Any debris entering catch basins after cleaning is washed
into our channels, harbor waterways, and the Bolsa Chica
• An average of 16 cars per mile are being bypassed in non-
posted residential areas, compared to 5 cars per mile in
posted areas
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS
• Return to twice per month
street sweeping
f - ;
.iRf(�a .. »�{r �'� ��4 • '�'k t �', '45 dA:� _��"ac A��y0�7 a� a<�. ,� ��°wR�'
to
P � .'►V.r� �+' �b � ��� �"Isl'iJ '�'� ' # � ..�". *� ;,,,a 4 �, �''fib•r Q��,°
rr
Post streets throughout the �•�r "�•r .� _ 9 �� %$0
, �+ � } fir, t'{ � ., ��,,.� �'" z"
'l
city with no parking
.n ,
during sweeping hours
signs # r
0� � t � t
• Enforce posted areas `"
ttyy
Replace curbs and gutters
on petition streets at an ' N
estimated cost of $8 . 1 mil. ry
} Al.
QUESTIONS REGARDING
THESE SOLUTIONS
• How frequently are other cities sweeping?
• Have other cities .initiated " No Parking" posting
programs?
• Is a pasting program effective?
• How does a posting program increase efficiency?
• What are the posting impacts in "high density"
areas?
• Do we have a posting program now & how does it
work?
ANSWERS to QUESTIONS
• Only two of the 31 cities in O.C. sweep less than twice per
month- we are one of them
• The neighboring communities of Fountain Valley, Garden
Grove, and Santa Ana have posted all residential streets
• Posting programs are effective as fewer cars are left on the
street, thereby increasing efficiency of the sweeping
High density areas would be impacted by posting, therefore
alternate day sweeping must be considered
o The City of H. B . does have a posting program now,
however residents must petition the City to post areas
STAFF 'S RECO TION
That staff be directed to provide the
Managed Competition Committee with a
plan, including estimated costs and
revenues, for the implementation of a twice
per month "posted" street sweeping
program
r
.RECEIVED FROM ,,ei& �/�JU ✓ �
AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD A�TiL��c/
COUNCIL MEETING OF b
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
i
qff
WED F-11 0rui n•1�o.
C?MADE A PART OP THE. E ORyJ4T TF
COUNCIL MEETIII OF�
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CON ME E;PIOCKWAY,CITY CLERK
c-ate
y
- -ST EPT POTHOLES AND THEIR CAUSES
r
•Inadequate level of maintenance results
in cracks
•Excessive water or rain seeps through
cracks into base material, under asphalt
k ns surface and weakens e e u c
*Vehicles drive over weakened surface -
causing breaks and holes in pavement �-
� ��y
WHY ARE POTHOLES A
PROBLEM ?
• Potholes destroy streets
• Potholes are a health and
safety hazard to motorists,
causing damage to vehicles
and loss of control to vehicle
steering
• Potholes are visually
unattractive
,HO WTV SERIOUS
'77 :: ;; PROBLEM ?
_ Many arterial streets and
city alleys are severely
potholed
Residential streets are
-- `�k, moderately potholed
- _ -. T_ LE REPAIRED A REP T I�
-Temporary Rep airs
-T-Pothole filled with asphalt
- Re. uires 15 min. for typical 1 s . ft.
q YP q ;
Per manent Repair s
Damaged section, including base
cRO
material, is removed and replaced
Requires 45-60 min. for typical 1 sq. ft.
Potholes are a health and
safety problem for residents
and tourists
Potholes have significantly
g Y
1Hdamaged our arterial streets
IN
Staff is outside
pursuing
CONCLUSION . sources of funding to repair
our damag
ed arterials
FIB
CI ' Y OF HUNTING ON TEACH
--
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 0 Nd
VIA: Ray Silver, Acting City Administrator ZR.
FROM: Daryl D. Smith, Acting Director of Public Works l 18
SUBJECT: Response to City Council Request for CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Modification of the Street Sweeping Program ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
r?ECommEno� AeT�ov ,Di,e r -NeriNG C/y
DATE: March 4, 1998 ADY"1Ai/A9TX-1+_b9— 47- 1415 OPrion; t�/sc `Ti on/gNj) 7 yklAib G e:N
)OXE5tNT /fis epee o mm el7deet Pfa h A'e- �h l,s isscl e • 7i
R rn/:V),57 Xe i /19Pt m�a ; gd- /t/s ��ae� WO&�0 ,Bd
01/C� P ` �Ylal✓T/t VS.'7Wl t.e yYKvw, i4ily WHi4T mob N!o
At the February 17 meeting, City Council directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation
concerning returning to twice a month street sweeping City wide. The report should include the cost of
changing back to twice a month as well as whether or not any increased street sweeping can be
performed by a private contractor. Staff was also directed to investigate the possibility of posting no
parking at certain times, throughout the City, to improve the effectiveness of sweeping.
1. What is the cost of returning the sweeping program to twice a month?
Staff estimates that the City's additional cost would be approximately $200,000 per year. This
amount includes personnel, equipment, fuel and sweeper maintenance; . --�
The existing Street Cleaning Program (520) includes hazardous materials clean-up, removal of
trash, and abandoned items from streets and alleys, and street sweeping. The 1997/98 budget
for the program is $561,000.
2. Can the additional service be provided by a contractor?
Yes. There are several companies that provide street sweeping services. Staff will prepare
specifications that will be reviewed by an outside authority. The bid documents will then be
submitted to the Managed Competition Committee for approval. Once approved, the City will
request proposals and bids for service. In keeping with the managed competition program, staff
will also prepare a bid for performing the additional service. The sealed bid will be submitted to
Purchasing prior to bid openings.
3. What would be the cost of posting and enforcing signs that prohibit parking on street
sweeping days?
To determine the cost of a posting and enforcement program, staff outlined a basic policy. Signs f
would be posted only at the entrance to each residential tract. Downtown and commercial areas
would be posted on each street. The enforcement vehicle would follow the sweeper and cite
violators. Public Works staff would hire four temporary workers, at a cost of$70,000 annually, to
issue citations to illegally parked vehicles. Fuel and maintenance for enforcement vehicles would
be approximately $5,000. In addition, initial costs for signs, poles and enforcement vehicles
would be approximately $135,000.
0030641.01
(7A^,ro
3/jt,/98
Modification of the Street Sweeping Program
March 4, 1998
Page 2
4. What is the projected revenue for an enforced City wide no parking on sweeping days
program?
Under the outlined program, only vehicles illegally parked in the street at the time of actual sweeping
will be cited. Revenues will be determined by the amount of the citation, and the number of
violations issued. The current cost of a no parking violation in Huntington Beach is $32. In the City
of Garden Grove, where the posted area is comparable in size to Huntington Beach, a similar
program generates approximately 25,000 citations annually.
Below are some alternative citation rates which generate different levels of revenue. Projections
assume 20,000 citations annually, however, revenues will vary according to the actual number of
violations.
Citation Amount Estimated Annual Revenue
$14 per citation $275,000
$28 per citation $563,000
$32 per citation $640,000
5. How would this program increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the street sweeping
service?
The sweepers will be able to access an entire street rather than going around parked vehicles.
Street gutters and catch basins will be cleaner and have fewer maintenance problems. The storm
drain system will work more efficiently to remove water from the streets. Residents will benefit from
cleaner streets and less debris flowing into the storm drain system, and ultimately the harbour,
estuary and ocean. More thorough and frequent sweeping will decrease stagnant water
accumulation, thus reducing odors and pest problems.
Summary
The estimated costs of sweeping twice a month and City-wide no parking enforcement, including
personnel, equipment, maintenance, and signage are:
Current Sweeping Program $300,000
One Additional Day per Month 200,000
Enforcement of No Parking Signs 75,000
First Year Start-up Costs 135,000
Program Total $710,000
Accounting and budget procedures will be established to monitor program revenue and
expenditures. The process outlined above can be the basis for an effective and efficient street
sweeping program. Upon City Council direction, staff will draft and submit program policies and
procedures for City Council review and approval.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH G
HWMNGTONBEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMO
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members.
From: Tom Harman, City Council Member goo , >v
Date: January 21, 1998 � '2
Subject: "H"Item-February 17, 1998, City Council Meeting- Tivice-a Month
Street Sweeping
I believe the City Council decision to reduce street-sweeping in the city to one day a month has
proven to be a mistake.
Negative Aspects of Once-a-Month Street Sweeping:
1. Standing water in residential curbs;
2. Visual blight;
3. Numerous constituent complaints;
4. Unsafe health conditions;
5. Clogged gutters and storm drains.
Recommended Action:
I move that the City Administrator be directed to return to the City Council within 30 days with a
report and recommendation concerning returning to twice-a-month street sweeping City wide.
The report should include the cost of changing back to twice-a-month street sweeping as well as
whether or not any increased street sweeping can be performed by a private contractor, i.e.,
privatization.
TH:lp
xc: Ray Silver,Acting City Administrator
Les Jones, Director of Public Works
Connie Brockway, City Clerk
IUt 14 ;UW II-r1 LUKE-It I-UKI'I'o o< F'I?Ir.4l11, i'14 84 r'4 1-' 01
-:i i
'1
ii
I
i
7642 Tuyier drive♦ Huntington Beach,CA,A264$
Phone 847-6074♦ Fax(714)847-5074
riebru�rfi1�,199�
4= M
TO' Honorable Mayor and City Council Members `�
j^_a'1m
i Cn
rn
SUBJECT: Support of "H-2" Si--Monthly Street Sweeping
P-
.A.
P'
In my neighborhood we have a posted sweeper day ticketing program that works quite
well, except %iQg_a_.,t1;lp h is too long bet ,q_cleanina. Citation revenue that should
more than cover the cost of the sweeper operation in our area is also reduced in the
monthly program.
I' was shocked to learn,that.the program enforced in my neighborhood is not a city
wide policy. It seems that the majority of streets in this city are neither posted or cited.
By design this is a very costly and ineffective program- If streets aren't posted and
cars are parked by the curb, how can the street be properly swept? If cars aren't cited
what is the insensitive to move them off the street? A posted sweeper day ticketing
policy city wide would vastly improve the cleanliness of City streets and generate
revenue to pay for the program.
I support Councilman Harman's proposal to return to a Twice-a-Month Street
Sweeping Program, and encourage you to add to the F2ecom ended Acti,orl a policy to
include posting and ticketing on sweeper day on all City streets.
Most neighboring cities have such policies, Why can't Huntington beams????
Sincerely,
Jim Martin
s
FEB-17-98 TUE 16 :22 TAILORED FORMS & PRINTIG 714 847 5074 P. e2
JIM MARTIN
rim
MA2 Taor Drive 4,Huntington Beach,CA,92648 r
Phone 847-Q74 Fax(714)847-5074
{,. r 2-
Ibbru��
-10
- TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
9
SUBJECT: Support of "H-2" - Bi-Monthly Street Sweeping C�Q �e�
In my neighborhood we have a posted sweeper day ticketing program that works quite
well, except once a month i5..too long ba we, n cleaning. Citation revenue that should
more than cover the cost of the sweeper operation in our area is also reduced in the
monthly program.
I was shocked to learn that the program enforced in my neighborhood is not a city wide
policy. It seems that the majority of streets in this city are neither posted or cited. By
design this is a very costly and ineffective program. if streets aren't posted and cars
are parked by the curb, how can the street be properly swept? If cars aren't cited what
is the incentive to move them off the street? A posted sweeper day ticketing policy city
wide would vastly improve the cleanliness of City streets and generate revenue to pay
for the program.
I support Councilman Harman's proposal to return to a Twice-a-Month Street
Sweeping Program, and encourage you to add to the &,cQmm, a policy to
include posting and ticketing on sweeper day on all City streets,
Most neighboring cities have such policies. Why can't Huntington Beach????
Sincerely,
Jim Martin
�1
RECEIVED
CITY OF HUNTINGTON 13EA0FcJ`"'
HUNTINGTONBEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMO HuwT'N,-,'f
CA/70 S7*Ycle 7
To:
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Tom Harman, City Council Member
Date: January 21, 1998
Subject: "H"Item- February 17, 1998, City Council Meeting- Twice-a-Month
Street Siveeping
I believe the City Council decision to reduce street-sweeping in the city to one day a month has
proven to be a mistake.
Negative Aspects of Once-a-Month Street Sweeping:
1. Standing water in residential curbs;
2. Visual blight;
3. Numerous constituent complaints;
4. Unsafe health conditions;
5. Clogged gutters and storm drains.
Recommended Action:
I move that the City Administrator be directed to return to the City Council within 30 days with a
report and recommendation concerning returning to twice-a-month street sweeping City wide.
The report should include the cost of changing back to twice-a-month street sweeping as well as
whether or not any increased street sweeping can be performed by a private contractor, i.e.,
privatization.
TH:lp
xc: Ray Silver, Acting City Administrator
Les Jones, Director of Public Works
Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Page 17 -Council/Agency Minutes -03/21/94
(City Council) DOGGIE WALK BAG DISPENSERS FOR MAIN STREET -APPROVED AS AMENDED
(500.10)
The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administration requesting authorization for the
Director of Public Works to participate in the Doggie Walk Bag Dispensers for Main Street Project through the
following actions: install bag dispensers on light poles in six locations on Main street, provide and install
street signs above the dispensers and expend $100 to purchase 2,000 refill bags.
Councilmember Winchell requested that the Doggie Walk Bag Dispensers be distributed on Main Street from
Pacific Coat Highway to the Library.
The Public Works Director responded that this could be done.
A motion was made by Leipzig, second by Sullivan, to install bag dispensers on light poles in six locations on
Main street, provide and install street signs above the dispensers and expend $100 to purchase 2,000 refill
bags and the Doggie Walk Bag Dispensers to be distributed on Main Street from Pacific Coast Highway to the
Library. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Silva, Bauer, Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
(City Council) RESOLUTION NO. 6580 RESCINDING STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM -
BOUNDED BY ADAMS/ATLANTA& BROOKHURST/ MAGNOLIA - MSC-365 (800.10)
The City Clerk presented Resolution No. 6580 for Council adoption -"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REPEALING HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 6532 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PILOT PROGRAM FOR NO
PARKING ON STREET SWEEPING DAYS." (Repeals Resolution No. 6532 thereby abandoning the Street
Sweeping Pilot Program.)
Councilmember Sullivan commended the Public Works Department for the outstanding job of the street
sweeping pilot program. He stated, however, that the public was against the program.
A motion was made by Leipzig, second by Sullivan, to adopt Resolution No. 6580 rescinding the Street
Sweeping Pilot Program. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Silva, Bauer, Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Leipzig, Sullivan
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
(City Council) CONTINUED FROM MARCH 7, 1994 MODIFICATION TO CITY CLASSIFICATION PLAN -
ART CENTER CLASSIFICATIONS -RESOLUTION NO. 6554 -CONTINUED TO APRIL 4, 1994 (700.10)
(City Council)ACQUISITION OF PARCEL FOR INCLUSION IN HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK PER
HOLLY SEACLIFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - NORTHEAST CORNER EDWARDS STREET AND
ELLIS AVENUE - DEFERRED (650.40)
(City Council)AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT - BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION -
WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN AND FINANCING PLAN - CONTINUED TO APRIL 4, 1994 (600.10)
Page 3 -Council/Agency Minutes -03/21/94
Mohammed Memon, Sunline Electric Chair Vice President of Operations and son of the owner, spoke in
support of the bands scheduled to perform in the parking lot of the Sunline Electric Chair clothing store. He
stated that there have been three successful band concerts in the parking lot and listed improvements
planned for the concert to include increased security staff, identifying clothing for security staff, security at the
alley, store rest rooms will be available to the public, and written instructions for conduct will be given to the
band members. He stated that he is willing to meet with the Police Department to work out any problems as
cancellation of the event would mean loss of sales for the store, disappointed participants and no food drive
for the needy in the community.
Richard Henderson, stated he was Chairman of the Citizens Advisory Committee Chairman Orange County
Transportation Authority, but speaking as a private citizen in opposition to the proposed Orange County
Urban Rail Program and Urban Rail Corridor. He challenged the City Council to speak out for the rights of the
taxpayers and senior citizens as the city will be required to subsidize the system and will not benefit from it.
He stated he would distribute a communication to Council.
Loretta Wolfe, Downtown Residents Association representative, spoke in support of agenda item E-7
regarding doggie walk bag dispensers for Main Street and stated that the Downtown Residents Association,
Downtown Merchants Association and the city promoted this idea in order to encourage pet owners to be
responsible for their pets. She requested that the dispensers be extended from the first three blocks to the
first six blocks of Main Street.
Nicholas Lower spoke in opposition to Resolution No. 6532 regarding the Street Sweeping Pilot Program and
stated that he represented six people. He stated that the streets are cleaner in areas without the program.
Leon McKinney spoke in opposition to salary"spiking" and salary increase for the City Administrator. He
commended Councilmember Sullivan for bringing the"spiking" issue up. He spoke in opposition to the
proposed Urban Rail Program and requested the Council to study the issue. He spoke in support of a
program that would charge commuters for use of the carpool lanes for single passenger vehicles.
Jan Vandersloot, Bolsa Chica Land Trust Vice President, spoke in opposition to the proposed extension of
Seapoint Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and requested that the decision be delayed until after the Linear
Park and General Plan Amendment update is approved. He spoke in support of on street parking on
Seapoint Avenue.
Michele Rivituso spoke in opposition to agenda item E-16 street sweeping pilot program and stated that the
streets are clean.
William Mello read from a letter from his sons Dr. David and Barbara Mello, Mark Mello and Scott Mello, and
himself, in opposition to salary"spiking"and city retirement being paid from property taxes. He distributed a
communication to Council.
Chuck Scheid spoke in opposition to the acquisition of property in the Holly Seacliff area and stated that the
option for acquisition is open for five years and recommended that the Council defer action until a future date.
Marie St. Germain spoke in opposition to salary"spiking".
Jim Banks, Chairman of Citizens Against Retirement Tax, spoke in opposition to the law firm retained by the
city to investigate the legality of the salary"spiking" issue. He spoke in support of not processing the spiking
portion of current retirement applications.
Laura Madariaga spoke in opposition to the extension of Seapoint Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and in
support of a road with a gate for emergency vehicles and a traffic signal for pedestrian crossing to the beach.
Don Guillaume spoke in opposition to the extension of Seapoint Avenue to Pacific Coast Highway and in
opposition to the inadequate amount of parking planned for the Linear Regional Park.
RECOYEB
C TY " ERK
kk L-TY 20262 Wind Cave Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
2 7-S January 12, 1994
Dear Council members:
WE do not want mandatory no parking in our tract for the following reasons:
NO PLACE TO PARK CARS:
a. For parties, baby and bridal showers.
b. When friends come to visit.
c. When our parents come. There is only one day they have free a week.
d. When our children visit from Sacramento and stay for a week or more.
e. For landscaping and repair trucks etc.
WE ARE LOSING OUR FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
We cannot choose which days to have the gardener come, the decorator come,
the repairman come because there will be no place for them to park.
THE MONEY SPENT CAN BE BETTER USED FOR OTHER URGENT PROJECTS.
We have lived in Huntington Beach for 28 years and it was a great place to raise
children. However, with a stabbing at Edison, a serious incident at another school
involving the plan to take over a school room, carjackings, drugs etc. I am not sure that
I would choose to raise a family here now.
GOVERNMENT IS TAKING MORE CONTROL.
We want the right to decide, not the city to decide for us when and where to park.
We have lived here 28 years and Huntington Beach has been agreat place to raise
children. Please don't restrict our choices now.
WE LIKE THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE.
Sincerer
Dick a e nor Le
1.
We do not want mandatory no parking for street sweeping in our area.
0(o.-f :7�11"r 4n. tfb,
S4 -7 0
Let it be known that Yasuko and George Kelso of 20252 Windcave Ln,
are opposed of the new or proposed parking law to be set in our
housing tract,. .as it is being handled now. There are many reasons
this would cause undo problems for the residence . Also
house hold and gardening trucks would have problems .
I agree that we need to make room for the street cleaning truck,
but I propose a compromise and think one side of the street
on different dayss would be far less disriptive .
0
O/M
REQUE T FOR CITY COUNT _ ACTION
Date March 21, 1994
Submitted to: Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat
Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works
�t�-� 19
Subject: cn ci,�xx
STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM MSC 365 ---
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception 46W0
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Att1 W nts: 6�
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Staff has not initiated the Street Sweeping Pilot Program.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Repeal Resolution Number 6532; thereby abandoning the Street Sweeping Pilot Program.
ANALYSIS:
On October 4, 1993, Council adopted Resolution Number 6532, thereby establishing a
Street Sweeping Pilot Program bounded on the north and south by Adams and Atlanta
_Avenues, and on the east and west by Brookhurst and Magnolia Streets. Pursuant to the
Council approval of this resolution, all residents within the pilot area were to be notified
of the program. Therefore, on December 20, 1993, staff notified each resident, via a door
hanger, (see attachment A) of the Street Sweeping Pilot Program. Residents who had
questions or concerns about the Program were invited to attend a Town Hall Meeting on
Wednesday, January 5, 1994 in the Council Chambers at 6:30 P.M.
Approximately sixty people attended the Town Hall Meeting. Of those in attendance,
seventeen people came forward and publicly spoke about the Program. Not one speaker
spoke in favor of the program (see attachment B - Synopsis of public comments). In fact,
two petitions, against the Program, (see attachment C) were given to staff. Based on this
input, staff assured residents that the City would not move forward with the Pilot Program
until after this report was given to Council for review, consideration, and further direction.
After further review and discussion of the Town Hall Meeting comments, staff concluded
that the Resolution establishing this pilot program should be repealed. This action would
not however preclude residents from establishing the program through the petitioning
process.
,�9
Plo 5/85
PAGE 2
RCA - MSC-365
FUNDING SOURCE:
N/A
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Direct staff to proceed with the Pilot Program.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" - Letter of notice to residents dated December 20, 1993
Attachment "B" - Summary of comments from Town Hall Meeting
Attachment "C" - Two petitions, from residents opposed to Program, dated January 5,
1994
RESOLUTION NO. 6580
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH REPEALING HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 6532 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PILOT
PROGRAM FOR NO PARKING ON STREET SWEEPING DAYS
WHEREAS, October 4, 1993, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
adopted Resolution No. 6532, which established a pilot program for no parking on street
sweeping days in an area bounded by Adams and Atlanta Avenues, and Magnolia and
Brookhurst Streets; and
The City Council now desires to abolish the aforesaid pilot program,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. That Huntington Beach City Council Resolution No. 6532 is hereby
repealed, and the pilot program for no parking on street sweeping days established therein
is hereby abolished.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of March , 1994. _ ... .. ....
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk 3G JCity Attorney Jam, -�-r-aq
TIATED APPROVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
Director f Pubhc Works City Administrator
Res. No. 6580
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the
affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 21ST day of MARCH , 1994 ,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
Silva, Bauer, Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Lei zig, Sullivan
NOES: Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
None
•
City Clerk and ex-officio Cl
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM
TOWN HALL MEETING OF JANUARY 5, 1994
Approximately sixty (60) people attended the Street Sweeping Pilot Program
meeting, and the following is a synopsis of the comments spoken during the public
comments portion. It should be noted, that by a show of hands, no one in the
audience supported the Sweeping Pilot Program.
SPEAKERS
1. NAME AND ADDRESS UNKNOWN
Is the cost for signing the entire city in the budget?
Will the Program interfere with current law enforcement efforts?
2. BILL SHERMAN - 9642 CAITHNESS DRIVE
Does not have any trouble with current parking and cleanliness of streets.
Perhaps Indianapolis should be periodically cleaned.
3. FORREST BONNER - 20241 RAMONA LANE
No one has petitioned for this Program - why now?
What are the expected positive results of this Program?
Any documentation on health or safety hazardous - or if they are caused by
not sweeping.
Has legal council looked into if only posting at entrances is legal?
4. FLOYD PHILLIPS - 9572 CAITHNESS DRIVE
How long will Program run?
Who will be evaluating Program?
He believes current level of cleaning service is adequate and City is doing a great
job cleaning their street.
1
If we do not want this Program in our neighborhood what do we do - petition?
What percent will be needed to stop Program.
5. BETH MOWLL - 9771 SALINE DRIVE
She feels streets are well maintained even with parked cars on the street, and why
fix something that is not broken.
Citizens should have right to vote for the Program and there should be no
ticketing.
6. BARBARA JONES - 20251 JOHNSON LANE
Has several cars and a motorhome. It would be an inconvenience to remove cars
from street.
Should have been previously notified about Program for their input.
She keeps her area clean.
7. FRED FRONTINO - 20332 HARBOR ISLE LANE
Spoke on behalf of the owner. Owner has a work schedule that would make it an
inconvenience to move cars.
Should have gotten citizen input.
8. CHRIS KING - 9181 PADDOCK CIRCLE
Waste of gasoline, etc. to implement Program.
9. DON LEWIS - 9532 CAITHNESS DRIVE
As a City employee he is proud of the provided services but opposed to this
Program.
Many kids are back in homes for economic reasons, and he does not want to see
his friends and neighbors getting traffic tickets.
Feels we do a good job now.
2
10. PRICE GRANDY - 9591 CAITHNESS DRIVE
Was not notified that City Council was considering Program.
Some residents are for the Program as a way to remove motorhomes and R.V.'s
from street.
City doing a great job of cleaning now, and Program will be a waste of manpower
that could be doing other work.
11. DICK LENELL - 20262 WIND CAVE LANE
Felt Council did not care what citizens think.
Residential streets do not need sweeping.
Where can they put vehicles on sweeping day?
What about the possibility of sweeping alternate days - one side of street at a time.
12. STEPHEN SANFORD - 9131 FIVE HARBORS DRIVE
Petitions are usually submitted to get a street sweeping policy changed, but now
residents of the area need to get a petition together to come back to City Hall.
Residents should have been asked if they wanted the Program.
13. PETER SALAFIA - 9201 ALBANY CIRCLE
A vehicle that is clean under it may get a ticket.
14. DAVID ROSSO - 9191 HALF LEAGUE DRIVE
Only previous problem on street was flooding several years ago. Cleanliness is
not a problem.
From reading the RCA he feels the Program is to generate revenue. No
documentation that it is for cleanliness. RCA was thin on justification.
Should have been a Council item with notice to the public.
How can City absorb costs of signs and parking enforcement?
3
15. GARY ROYSDON - 20901 BEACHWOOD LANE
His area is very clean.
How much money has been allocated for this Program?
You are supposed to petition the City when you want something but no one here
wants this Program.
16. DAVE GUILD - 20802 LANCELOT LANE
He has been in law enforcement for twenty-eight years and is opposed to the City
holding an entire area hostage for four hours.
If Program is implemented, a two day sweeping period would allow residents to
move their vehicles from one side of the street to the other side.
17. JOEL GRIFFIN - 20662 ELIZABETH LANE
Is there any evidence from other cities that they have seen improvement since
ticketing?
The City I have worked for has gone through this and have seen no improvement -
other than revenue generation.
FORREST BONNER, AGAIN
Will you make a report to the City Council and let us know when it comes before
them?
FRED FRONTINO, AGAIN
Concerned that when City Council sees the revenue from the Program, that they
will expand it city-wide.
FORREST BONNER, AGAIN
Presented petition signed by audience.
FLOYD PHILLIPS, AGAIN
Presented signatures from a get-together at his house over the holidays.
4
MR. SANDOVAL CONCLUDED THE MEETING WITH A THANK YOU TO EVERYONE
FOR ATTENDING, AND THAT HE WOULD NOT START THE PROGRAM ON JANUARY
31 ST.
HE WILL PREPARE A REPORT GIVING RESULTS OF THE MEETING TO COUNCIL.
RESIDENTS WILL RECEIVE DOOR HANGERS WITH COPIES OF ALL
CORRESPONDENCE THAT GOES TO CITY COUNCIL
5
ea COTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department
Director (714) 536-5431
J
December 20, 1993
Dear Resident:
On October 4, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution 6532 (see attached) to establish
a Street Sweeping Pilot Program in your neighborhood. The program, designed to insure
that the street.in. front of your home is swept on a regular basis, encompasses a one
square mile area bounded on the North and South by Adams and Atlanta Avenues, and
on the East and West by Brookhurst and Magnolia Streets (see attached map).
The program is slated to begin January 31, 1994; however, I am concerned that you may
have questions regarding the program and how it will affect you personally. Therefore,
I have scheduled a Town Hall Meeting on Wednesday, January 5, 1994. The meeting
will be held in the Council.Charnbers of City Hall at 6:30 P.M. I look forward to meeting
with you, atthis'time.
Should you. have immediate questions or concerns regarding this program, please
telephone Don'Noble of our Maintenance Division at (714) 375-5024.
Very truly your
6L'-�O'
.
t)7��
Louis F. S ndoval
Director of Public Works
LFS:bh
cc: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator
Don Noble, Acting Maintenance Operations Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 6532
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO
ESTABLISH A PILOT NO PARKING ON STREET
SWEEPING DAYS IN AN AREA BOUNDED BY ADAS
TO ATLANTA AND MAGNOLIA TO BROOKHURST.
WHEREAS, the city is desirous of improving the street cleaning operation within
the city and parked automobiles prohibit the effectiveness of this operation. It has
been recommended by the Public Works Department that a pilot area for posting signs
prohibiting parking on street sweeping days be established in the area of the city
bounded by Adams to Atlanta and magnolia to Brookhurst, and
The City Council in may of 1981 established a city policy that the installation of
no parking on street sweeping days would only be established for an area upon the
submission of a petition signed by a majority of property owners on said streets,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach hereby establishes the area as stated above to be a pilot area and
directs the Director of Public Works to post the area with signs restricting parking on
street cleaning days and directs the Police Department to enforce the no parking
. restriction. The policy of may 1981 for this area is hereby suspended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of October 11993.
e
Mayor
A EST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk ��> City Attorney�
C�
REVIF N PPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator irector of Public Works
6/resolut/sweep/09/22/93
Res® No. 6532
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ; ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the A h day
of October_, 19 93 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
Bauer, Moulton-Patterson. Winchell , Silvad Gulliva., T'eizz;$
NOES: Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
Robitaille
PO
CitJAW
y ClerK and ex-offi-ciavClerk
of the City Council of the' City
of Huntington Beach, California
J
uj
��... J s 0
17 11 '$ 1
a 126 j 127; 128 F�c HUNTINGTON BEACH
-+ BOLSA �^ AVE
a ARGOSY O 137 138 139 -�
�
cc ` Mc FA OEM AVE
m .«
y .H 146 147 148 149 24 '24
EDINGER AVE CENTER ORIYE
'4 152 1531 1 4 1 15 156� H57 158 A159 2 252 1
�.- - -�--+- N ....
16 15 163 1s 165o 166 1s7 1s3y 1s 2s 2s2 2s3 ; 2s
--�-- WARNER, AVE I
172 ' o a �'975u s77. 1ER 8¢ 179 ' 27 272 273
4fi z o
18 , 1 0�185 1186 187 188 189� 25 282m 263
— L — — - -O ^x TALBERT AVE \
�C®AI 19 1 105 1 196 119� 59 199" 2 0 1292 293 :AVE in
-
cc
3 � 316 � 317.' 3 319 41 i 2 413 a
GARFILEO AVE 3 /
" 327-1'128 1329 4 1 422 423 424 425 426 427 8
4 — Z YORK OWN AVE
3 ad f 33a$ 9 14 1 433`" 434 435`" 43s" 437 38
432 ADAM
uj
3 144%, 442 443 444 44 w
s INDIANAP 0 LI AV
�5 4 4 2m Q
453 I45C 4 a
ATL NTA O A
O v Z O
V) O
�-1 61; \62 463 J 464, 4 o5m 466HAM m
Q
472N . z 474 475 476 477
_ — BANNING AVE
65 48
49
j ,,�t; 6532
re1-2
91;z
a
Ll 7�11IA7-7i-,La� J&e, (�2 6 5�6 q6 7-- 7 J
H &7 Nu dd-Z 05 Y;L-�i"�rvi GA/
z(- n �-
��_ Ll � z Lu) l
?C (/G "/J-7
S e oar,
l -- -?3"7
r N •1
13
ter.
��� �`,t�'�. CC r� �D� .7( I%v�1h�4�i3a �i�•,.� r'I z��(o �� �i��Cv
3 r-e, - �G q7 al A11F,n y Cg �� �12�4� � �3
ed- 7���s s s 26 y 6
9 CAci cf„re5 s Id,5' 926 +Cc
� v efJ� .o �' -- 9 s?oz •5/L ri���P rr�',9 y .�.� !-ass l z � �b
/7
C-7
- PD "
REQUEbT CITY ILACTION
Date October 4, 1993
Submitted to: Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrato A , 'ILO'VEP BY CITY COUNCIL.
Prepared by:
Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works ®® " 19.ME
Subject: STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM MSC 365 C C °
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: A/
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Public Works has selected an area comprised of four contiguous quarter sections,
bounded by Adams Avenue to Atlanta Avenue and by Magnolia Street to Brookhurst
Street, to be posted for no parking on street sweeping day, by City Council Directive.
RECOMMENDATION:
i. Adopt Resolution No. which will remove this area from prior City Council policy to
post only upon majority requests, and to establish this area to be posted by City
Council Directive, 4
2. Direct Public Works to post all area entries from the arterial boundary highways.
3. Direct the Police Department parking control to enforce the no parking restrictions
ANALYSIS: ®®
The City Council has expressed interest in exploring areas that could be revenue
producing, and provide more effective and efficient services to the public for the purpose
of reducing City costs. As the City has more demand for services with ever decreasing
revenues, increased efficiency will continue to be required.
Public Works recognized that one service area, street sweeping, could provide for both
explorations via a pilot program. The Program and subject of this RCA is to explore
revenue generation in a City Council directed area to be posted, in addition to improving
the general area cleanliness.
PIO 5/85
PAGE -2-
RCA
STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM MSC 365
A pilot area was selected as an initial trial for the Program for the following reasons:
1. The one square mile would contain approximately 2800 homes, and it is considered
a reasonable size to obtain a measure for revenue as well as complaints.
2. The initial outlay of funds for posting would be able to be managed within current
operation accounts.
3. The Police Department's parking control division can absorb this addition to its
workload without additional new personnel or equipment, and at no increase in
operating budget.
4. The first annual report of revenue and complaints received should provide sufficient
data to enable City Council on whether to expand the program.
The current City policy regarding posting was adopted by City Council on May 22, 1981,
by approval of two basic recommendations in an RCA which were as follows:
1. Continue the 1980 townlot area posted for no parking on one side on each sweeping
day.
2. Post tract areas only provided a petition signed by a majority of owners/residents
request posting. Operationally, posting was to occur only at area entries such as off
arterial streets, to reduce sign quantities.
There are other areas in the City that have been posted following receipt of petitions by
property owners or residents, however most are relatively small and scattered. The
previously described four quarter sections (one square mile) would amount to the largest
single contiguous area of posting. The pilot program would be monitored for at least 12
months. Records of revenue generated, complaints, and reports of calls regarding
improved cleanliness will be maintained for periodic subsequent reports to the City
Council.
The initial implementation of the Pilot Program will only involve costs of the signs,
estimated at $1500. Thereafter, the ongoing costs are estimated to be:
Sweeper & Operator $ 850/day
Parking Control $ 350/day
Estimated Total $1,200/day
PAGE -3-
RCA
STREET SWEEPING PILOT PROGRAM MSC 365
Based on current levels of compliance, the area is estimated to generate about $1250 on
each sweeping day, which basically equates to a service paying for itself.
The total costs for the period between December 1993 and June 30, 1994 would amount
to $18,300, these costs would cover fourteen sweeping days plus the cost of signage.
The estimated total for each subsequent fiscal year would be $28,800 for twenty-four
sweeping days.
The residents within the pilot area will be notified by HB TV Channel 3, and door hangers
delivered to each residence. In addition, a notice will be published in one or more
newspapers. Residents will also receive notification via courtesy tickets for the first
month, two sweepings, issued by Police Parking Control.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Public Works operating accounts will be used to cover the signage costs for the posting,
and no other costs are anticipated, at this time.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Do not adopt the resolution.
2. Review comments during any hearing after initial adoption.
3. Postpone consideration until both pilot programs can be implemented, at or about
the same time.
4. Table the desire to explore posting by directive.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. directing posting.
Information letter to resident of project Outreach - Area 1.
HBPD memorandum addressing capability to handle posted area with current level of
parking control personnel.
RESOLUTION NO. 6532
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO
ESTABLISH A PILOT NO PARKING ON STREET
SWEEPING DAYS IN AN AREA BOUNDED BY ADAMS
TO ATLANTA AND MAGNOLIA TO BROOKHURST.
WHEREAS, the city is desirous of improving the street cleaning operation within
the city and parked automobiles prohibit the effectiveness of this operation. It has
been recommended by the Public Works Department that a pilot area for posting signs
prohibiting parking on street sweeping days be established in the area of the city
bounded by Adams to Atlanta and Magnolia to Brookhurst, and
The City Council in May of 1981 established a city policy that the installation of
no parking on street sweeping days would only be established for an area upon the
submission of a petition signed by a majority of property owners on said streets,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach hereby establishes the area as stated above to be a pilot area and
directs the Director of Public Works to post the area with signs restricting parking on
street cleaning days and directs the Police Department to enforce the no parking
restriction. The policy of May 1981 for this area is hereby suspended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of October 1993.
Mayor
A EST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk 7�j City Attorney Cs��—
REVI ND PPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator frDirector of Public Works
6/reso lut/sweep/09/22/93
Res. No. 6532
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ; ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 n day
of October 19 93 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
Bauer, Moulton-Patterson, winchell , Silva, S„lliu-an, rpigzin
NOES: Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
Robitaille
•
City Cler and ex-o ici er
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
r
J �
Lu
s
16 1117 0 11 qti �*�1
- i - 10
z 126 1 1270 128 ' co HUNTINGTON BEACH
J BOLSAL AVE
n ARGOSY 137 138 139
2 ` Mc FA DEN AVE
m
W 146 147 148 149 24 24 CENTER DRIVE
EDINGER AVE
U
152 1 1531 1 4 1155�, 156 N 157 158 1159 2 1 252
HEIL AVE --
v? -I
16 ''.16 163I 164, 1658 166 167 168, 16 26 262 263 j 264
--L-- = WARN R AVE I _�
172 i Z 1".176°` 1 L 178 179 W 27 1 272 273
SLATER CC AVE
Z O
Z
18 ;1 401185 186 187 188 1890, 28 1 282 m-' 283
A� _ `�—i _ -0 _ z TALBERT AYE \\
C/,, 19 5 196 11§7 "is 199 291 1292 293
Ln
cc
3 sT� 316 1317" 3 319 41 I 2 413 a
_ GARFILED_ AVE 3
3 327-1 .1 329 4 1 422 423 424 425 1426 427 8
y _ Tq_ Q YORK OWN AVE /
1 � `� 433"' 434 4361, 436- 437 438 3 33� r' 9 4 1 N 4 2 AD AM AV
3 I441W 4-.2 443 444 4 44 w
INDIANAPOLI AVJo
• �F C � aI i �
a
59.1 4 4 +2w 453 454� 5 4 i
m ATLANTA O A Q
O a = O
1461" 62 463Q 4642 465m 466co 6�
HA TON AVE co
�• ..•- W rn
472 z 474 475 476 477
BANNING AVE
85 48
49
J, CITY UN TI 'T BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET P. 0. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
Louis F. Sandoval Public Works Department
Director (714) 536-5431
June 14, 1993 _ _
TO: Residents and Homeowners
Project Outreach - Area 1
FROM: City Administration and Public Works
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING
Please be advised that during the first quarter of 1993-1994 , July
1 - September 30, the City Administration and Public Works
Departments will be proposing that the City Council approve the
establishment of a trial posted area prohibiting parking on street
sweeping day.
The area selected is one square mile bounded on the North and South
by Adams Avenue and Atlanta Avenue, and on the West and East by
Magnolia Street and Brookhurst Street.
Current policy is to only post areas that petition to be posted,
and they are few in number, many forms for petitions have been
requested, however not completed, and it is considered the policy
of only posting arterial area entries establishes boundaries with
so many parcels, the requestors are discouraged from expending the
time and effort to solicit signatures.
Therefore, it is felt a trial area is worthy of consideration. The
establishment is anticipated to be by a resolution excepting
current policy for the area, and setting forth the days and times
for the posting, additionally, adoption of the resolution will
provide for a hearing for those in the area to express their views.
The primary goals are to provide cleaner streets in the area, and
to create cost savings by facilitating a less congested travel
route for the sweeper and reducing call outs for special pickups of
debris by hand crews.
Should you have any questions or comments, you may contact or write
to the City Administrator's office or Public Works.
Very truly yours,
Donald W. Kiser,
Operations Manager
DWK:bu
C11 . OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNWCTON BEACH
LKELL
TO: DONALD W.KISER FROM: Y IEUTENANT
OPERATIONS MANAGER /AERO BUREAU CDR
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING DATE: June 30, 1993
ENFORCEMENT
I will not comment on the area of contract street sweeping as it's beyond our expertise.
After consulting with all of the parking control personnel, the following information is provided
for inclusion in the report that you are submitting to the City Council regarding the expansion of
street sweeping programs and the enforcement of the areas to be posted on the days they are
swept.
The Traffic Bureau can enforce the proposed additional one square mile area without additional
staff using existing personnel and equipment. No cost to the City.
• Current fine for street sweeping violation is $16.00 (all revenue estimates are based on
this figure)
• Estimated revenue for this one square mile area,based on current levels of compliance in
similar areas presently posted,is about $2,500 a month,or $30,000 annually.
If the entire city were to be posted the Traffic Bureau would have to add staff in order to ade-
quately enforce the ordinance. The following is an estimate of the personal and equipment re-
quired and their associated costs needed to enforce the ENTIRE city:
• Two (2) additional parking control officers @ $44,598 each $ 89,196
• Two (2) additional vehicles (Chev GEO's) @ $12,931 each 25,902
IN Radio equipment (2) @ $5,500 each vehicle 11,000
Approx total $126,098
Estimated maximum revenue based on posting and enforcement of the ENTIRE city is approxi-
mately $904,000. (See attached memo to Chief Lowenberg dated April 29, 1993) It is unrealistic
to expect to reach this figure - a best guess estimate would be closer to $500,000 per annum.
Subtracting the current revenue of$164,000, the remaining $336,000 would be the additional
revenue generated by posting the entire city.
The bottom line is that we would have to spend $126,098 to generate $336,000. This nets the
City $209,902 in additional money to the general fund.
The revenue for the first year would be somewhat higher,but I couldn't even begin to guess how
much. To prevent overstating the revenues I would prefer to stay with the lower figure.
STREET SWEEPING ENFORCEMENT, June 30, 1993
Page 2
With the additional staff see no reason why the entire city can't be posted. We can bring addi-
tional revenue to the general fund as many other cities have.
Thanks for allowing us to have input into your report. If I can be of any further assistance please
don't hesitate to call.
cc: Chief Lowenberg - =
Capt McErlain ---
Ron Hagan
Attachment
Memo dated April 29, 1993
REQUES . FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date
May 22, 1981
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator . 'C'J� APPROVED B1' CITY C
.. OUNCIL
Prepared b
p Y� Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works
Subject: Parking Prohibitions for Street Sweeping
crr�r ct F —
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: V./
S'TAT} F ISSUE
On-street parking during street sweeping days on City streets continues to be a problem
throughout the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a policy of approving the installation of "no parking for street sweeping" signs
on City streets and enforcing same when a petition signed by a majority of property
owners on said streets has been submitted to City officials requesting these signs.
ANALYSIS:
In 1980, the.City Council approved several staff recommendations designed to improve the
City's street sweeping program.
Four new street sweepers were leased and began operating in September, 1980. Sweeping
efficiency has dramatically improved due primarily to little down time and maintenance
requirements as compared to the old street sweepers. Parking prohibition signs were in-
stalled .in September, 1980 in the townlot area of downtown and enforcement of these signs
began in November, 1980. This program has been very effective with respect to street
sweeping. Over 3,000 citations have been issued in this area since last November. In-
dications are that residents of the townlot area are respecting the parking prohibition
signs, thereby allowing more efficient street sweeping.
A public information flyer was enclosed in the January, 1981 issue of the Huntington Bea.c
Sands with a map showing the street sweeping schedule for the City and requesting volunta•
compliance by removing parked vehicles from the streets on the day on which they are to b,
swept. This flyer was again enclosed with the Sands in the March, 1981 issue.
Staff was directed to evaluate the public information campaign regarding street sweeping
and report back to the City Council on whether it was effective.
We have polled our street sweeper operators to determine their opinions of whether there
has been a noticeable compliance to no parking on street sweeping day. It was their con-
sensus that the signs in the townlot area have been very effective, but the voluntary
compliance throughout the rest of the City has not been significant. We also continue to
receive complaints about vehicles parked on sweeping days and requests to post no parking
signs, allowing the issuance of ciations for violations.
It is staff's opinion that the most effective way to keep our streets clean is to prohibi'
parking during sweeping days. It is also felt, however, that no parking signs should not
be posted on streets or for entire tracts unless a majority of the property owners reques
them. In this respect, the neighborhood has made the choice for clean streets with the
realization that friends and relatives may receive parking citations if the signs are
violated.
P10 4181
s
•
Request for Council Action
Parking Prohibition for Street Sweeping
May 22, 1981
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not authorize the posting of parking prohibitions for street sweeping.
2. Authorize posting of parking prohibitions based on complaints without requiring
a majority petition.
3. Direct all requests for street sweeping signs to the proposed Transportation
Commission for decision.
4. Authorize the posting of street sweeping signs throughout the entire City without
requests from citizens.
FUNDING SOURCE:
The funds for the recommended action estimated at $2,000 per year would cone from
the Public Works operating budget. Alternative No. 2 would cost an estimated additional
$3,000. Alternative No. 4 would cost approximately $75,000 which would come frown the
Capital Outlay Fund.
PEC:jy
i
Page 'W13 - Council Minutes - 6/15/81
The City Administrator reported on the proposal to establish an Economic Advisory
Board. Councilman Pattinson stated that he believed the Mayor should select the
board members or that one member could be selected by each Councilmember.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly to adopt Resolution No. 5006;
direct staff to advertise for positions on the Economic Advisory Board and to
select a City Council committee to review applications and make recommendations
to the City Council .
Considerable discussion was held by Council .
The motion carried with City Council members to review applications and make
recommendations to the City Council , by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Finley, Bailey, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: Thomas, Pattinson
ABSENT: None
RKIN �ORIMI+10NS.:FOR.S1RELT—SWE.. G_.
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Director of Public Works re-
garding parking prohibitions for street sweeping.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister, to adopt a policy of approv-
ing the installations of "no parking" for street sweeping signs on City streets
and enforcing same when a petition signed by a majority of property owners on said
streets is submitted to City officials requesting said signs. The motion carried
by the following vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: Thomas (out of room)
1981-86 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM --DEFERRED TO 7/6/81
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Director of Public Works regard-
ing a comprehensive five year Capital Improvement Program (C.I .P. ) for the City,
and requesting Council approval to utilize the document as a guide for the imple-
mentation of the City's Capital Improvement Program.
Councilman Pattinson stated that he had not had the opportunity to study the pro-
posed program and requested that it be deferred to the next meeting.
On motion by Pattinson, second Mandic, Council deferred consideration of the
1981-86 Capital Improvement Program to the July 6, 1981 Council meeting by the
following vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic, Kelly
NOES: None
ABSENT: Thomas (out of room)
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, INC. - APPROVED
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Director of Public Works trans-
mitting a renewal of contract between the City and Signal Maintenance, Inc.,, for mai
tenance of City-owned traffic signals and recommending that staff be authorized