Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStreets - General - 1982 - 1988 - Resolution 5883 - Resoluti - v° ro P,,Y� .,- DPW REQUE,jT FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION a Date May 12, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works CITV CL&RK Subject: Reconstruction and Resurfacing, Including Raised Landscaped Medians, o Adams Avenue between Newland Street and Magnolia Street Consistent with Council Policy? [ ]/vYes [ ] New Policy or Exception SO&3 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Procedures of the Orange County Transportation Trust Fund allow the City of Huntington Beach to receive 90% of the County's share of the construction funds after the award of the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution, requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to transfer $78,809.00 to the City of Huntington Beach for the reconstruction and resurfacing of Adams Avenue. ANALYSIS: Upon the request of the City of Huntington Beach, the Orange County Transportation ..Commission approved and allocated funds to help finance the reconstruction and resurfacing of Adams Avenues, between Newland Street and Magnolia Street. The Department of Public Works prepared plans and specifications and solicited bids. City Council accepted the low bid of $305,740.00 and awarded the contract to Sully - Miller Contracting Company. FUNDING SOURCE: City Gas Tax Funds, Account #747020 $343,814.00 Orange County Transportation Trust Fund 87,565.00 Total $431,379.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse previous actions and do not proceed with. the project, or modify the project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution PEC:LGE:PN:dw 1615g/6 0000 Plo 5/85 REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date June 28, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councils n APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrato�rZ JC 7— / q$� Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works --Ae CM Subject: Pavement Repairs and Asphalt Overlay on Magnolia Street between Indianapolis and Adams Avenue; CC-733 Consistent with Council Policy? ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception fe-T 11 c?oo Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Procedures of the Orange County Transportation Trust Fund allow the City of Huntington Beach to receive 90% of the County's share of the construction funds after the award of the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution, requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to transfer $65,000 to the City of Huntington Beach for the pavement repair and resurfacing of Magnolia Street. ANALYSIS: Upon the request of the-City of Huntington Beach the Orange County Transportation Commission approved and allocated funds to help finance the repair and resurfacing of Magnolia Street between Indianapolis and Adams Avenue. The Department of Public Works prepared plans and specifications and solicited bids on May 26, 1988. The City Council accepted the low bid of $135,519 and awarded the contract to the R.J. Noble Company. FUNDING SOURCE: City Gas Tax Funds, Account #747330 $1`67,760.00 Orange County Transportation Trust Fund 67,759:00 Total $135,519.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse previous actions and not proceed with the project, or modify the project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution PEC:LGE:US:dw 1692g/21 Pto 5/85 • OFFICE of ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH-CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 190.92648 PHONE(714)536-5271 NOTICE OF FILING STATUS AND PENDING PUBLIC HEARING Legal Filing Date: October 18, 1989 Petition/Document: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-30 Applicant: City of Huntington Beach o Public Works Department -4 x 2000 Main Street c� Cz Huntington Beach, CA 92648 rn Request: Pacific Coast Highway improvement plans between Goldegwes2-;,.m Street and Beach Boulevard. „ x Location: Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and $aOchi Boulevard. Lo Coastal Status: APPEALABLE Dear Applicant and Interested Persons: The above—referenced item has been accepted for processing. A legal description is on file with the Department of Community Development, Planning Division. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be heard by the Zoning Administrator in Room B-6 of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, at 1:30 P.M. on Wednesday, November 1, 1989. It is very important that the applicant or his representative be present at the hearing. Failure to appear may result in a denial of the application. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed petition. Further information may be obtained from Herb Fauland, Project Coordinator in the Department of Community Development, Planning Division, Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California; Telephone Number: (714) 536-5271. This project is in the Appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. The following appeal procedures will apply: Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Zoning Administrator is final unless an appeal is filed to the Planning Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be submitted to the Department of Community Development within ten (10) working days of the date of the Administrator's action. There is no fee for an appeal of a Coastal Development Permit. CDP No. 89-30 Page 2 Action taken by the Zoning Administrator may not be appealed directly to the Coastal Commission unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable. Section 13573(a)(3) states that an appeal may be filed directly with the Coastal Commission if the appellant was denied the right of local appeal because local notice and hearing procedures for the development did not comply with the provisions of this article. The other three grounds for direct appeal do not apply. If the above condition exists, an aggrieved person may file an appeal within ten (10) working days, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources Code, in writing to: California Coastal Commission 245 West Broadway, Suite 380 P. O. Box 1450 Long Beach, California 90801-1450 (213) 590-5071 The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised not to begin construction prior to that date. Very truly yours, Michael Strange Zoning Administrat By: Herb Fauland Assistant Planner MS:HF:lp cc: California Coastal Commission (5258h) REQUE FOR CITY COUNQ ACTION Date July 5, 1989 APPROVED BY CITY C"NCIL Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council v Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Af Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works3JL Y CCERf Subject: Matching Funds from State Shared Funds (SB 140) Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Resolutions by the City Council are required in order to apply for matching funds through the State Senate Bill 140 for highway pavement rehabilitation projects. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution for the request for matching funds from the State highway funds for the repair and rehabilitation of arterial streets. ANALYSIS: The Senate Bill 140 has available $300 million for distribution to Orange County cities for the restoration of highways. The Department of Public Works is applying for a portion of these funds, with the goal to extend Walnut Avenue from Lake Street to Beach Boulevard. One of the requirements is the availability of matching funds from the city. -- c � FUNDING SOURCE: x �_ N W n Redevelopment Funds Co ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Forego or reduce the amount of the state matching funds. a, n r .. r ATTACHMENTS: Resolution LFS:PN:lw Plo 5/85 1 REQUER FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date July 20, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works ppgOVED BY CITY GUUNGIL Subject: 20-Year Master Plan of Transportation Improvements 19-- C TY C ARK Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Orange County Transportation Commission has requested the city provide them with our future transportation needs for incorporation in a county-wide 20-Year Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approve City of Huntington Beach project list for the 20-Year Master Plan of Trans- portation Improvements. ANALYSIS: The Orange County Transporation Commission as the designated local transportation authority is responsible for preparation of a 20-Year Master Plan of Transportation Improvements. The purpose of the plan is to develop an overall list of projects based on needs and deficiencies throughout the county. Funding of these improvements will be investigated with and without additional revenue enhancements. The ultimate goal is to prepare a plan incorporating Orange County's future transportation needs, revenues, priorities and funding options. Staff has prepared the list of this city's anticipated transportation needs category prioritizing by low, moderate and high as requested by Orange Cou Tra sporation Commission. FUNDING SOURCE: 4 No expenditure of funds involved in this action. / ALTERNATIVE ACTION: t� i 1. Direct modifications to the list. 2. Deny approval of the list. ATTACHMENTS: City of Huntington Beach 20-Year Master Plan of Transportation Improvements, dated June 28, 1988. /(1 LE:JM:lw o �1 1728g / No 5/85 / 20-YEAR MASTER PLAN OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DESCRIPTION LEGEND ------------------------------ PROJECT CATEGORY ------------------------------ CAPITAL PROJECTS = PROJECTS OF SIGNIFICANT COSTS TSM = TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT PROJECTS ------------------------------ RW = ROADWAY WIDENING RS = RE-STRIPING NA = NEW ARTERIAL B = BRIDGE TS = TRAFFIC SIGNAL IC = INTERCONNECT PROJECT PRIORITY ------------------------------ N NIHUfRAIE' L = LOW ------------------------------ r ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20-YEAR MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATIION IMPROVEMENTS PARTS A AND B: PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT I T`+f"I' CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'s COMMENT (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROADWAY WIDENING ---------------- ATLANTA AV W/0 BUSHARD ST TO BUSHARD ST RW L 200,000 BY DEVELOPMENT ATLANTA AV LAKE ST TO DELAWARE ST RW H 1 ,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BEACH BLVD ELLIS AV TO EDINGER AV RW H 1 ,500,000 SUPER STREET OCTC BOLSA AV ABLE LN TO SPRINGDALE ST RW L 200,000 BY DEVELOPMENT BOLSA CHICA ST LOS PATOS ST TO WARNER AV RW L 500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE DELAWARE ST MEMPHIS ST TO MAIN ST RW L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV COUNTESS DR TO ALGONQUIN ST RW L 500,000 PENDING EXTENSION TO PCH EDWARDS ST GARFIELD AV TO TALBERT AV RW M 1 ,600,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ELLIS AV EDWARDS ST TO GOTHARD ST RW H 800,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ELLIS AV E/O BEACH RW H 1 ,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV EDWARDS ST TO GOLDENWEST ST RW M 700,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV GOLDENWEST ST TO BEACH BLVD RW M 3,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV E/O BEACH RW L 250,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GOLDENWEST ST PCH TO WARNER AV RW H 3,000,000 FUNDED, CONST '90 GOTHARD ST ELLIS AV TO CENTER DR RW M 50,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GOTHARD ST SLATER AV TO WARNER AV RW M 150,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GRAHAM ST WARNER AV TO HEIL AV RW M 800,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HEIL AV SILVER LN TO BEACH BLVD RW 800,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HEIL AV AT NEWLAND ST RW L 40,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE INDIANAPOLIS AV AT BUSHARD RW L 20,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MAGNOLIA ST PCH TO BANNING AV RW L 500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MAGNOLIA ST N/0 BANNING TO HAMILTON ST RW L 500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MAIN ST CLAY ST TO DELAWARE ST RW M 1,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE NEWLAND ST HAMILTON AV TO PCH RW H 1,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE NEWLAND ST S/O SLATER AV RW H 50,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PACIFIC COAST HWY GOLDENWEST ST TO BEACH BLVD RW H 1,200,000 FUNDED OCUTT/CITY PACIFIC COAST HWY BEACH BLVD TO BROOKHURST ST RW H 3,800,000 FUNDED CALTRANS SIXTH ST PCH TO OR AN,--" AV RW H 500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE SLATER AV AT CAMERON R'w L 50,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV GOLDENWEST ST TO GOTHARD ST RW H 800,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV E/O GOTHARD RW H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WALNUT AV SIXTH ST TO SECOND ST RW H 2O0,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARD ST N/O YORKTOWN TO GARFIELD AV RW L 300,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AVE PCH TO ALGONQUIN ST RW L 1 ,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV ALGONQUIN ST TO MAGNOLIA ST RW IC H 3,000,000 FAU/GAS TAX FUNDED YORKTOWN AV DELAWARE ST TO BEACH BLVD RW M 1 ,500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE $32,010,000 'F ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20 YEAR MASTERPLAN TRANSPORTATION COXMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS JUNE 28, 1988 PART B: ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'S COMMENET (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC ------------------ ---------------------------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------------------------------- HIGHWAY RE-STRIPING PROJECTS ---------------------------- ADAMS AV MAGNOLIA ST TO SA RIVER RS H 2O,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE BOLSA CHICA ST WARNER AV TO RANCHO RD RS M 40,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE BROOKHURST ST INDIANAPOLIS ST TO GARFIELD AV RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV ALGONQUIN ST TO BEACH BLVD RS H 50,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE EDWARDS ST HEIL AV TO BOLSA AV RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE ELLIS AV BEACH BLVD TO NEWLAND ST RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE GOLDENWEST ST SLATER AV TO BOLSA AV RS H 40,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE HEIL AV BOLSA CHICA ST TO BEACH BLVD RS M 30,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE MAGNOLIA ST ADAMS AV TO GARFIELD AV RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE MCFADDEN AV SPRINGDALE ST TO GOTHARD ST RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE SLATER AV GOLDENWEST ST TO NEWLAND ST RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE SPRINGDALE ST HEIL AV TO NORTH CITY LIMITS RS M 30,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV PCH TO MAGNOLIA ST RS M 50,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV BEACH BLVD TO BROOKHURST ST RS M 20,000 FUNDS AS AVAILABLE $400,000 i i f ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20-YEAR MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATIION IMPROVEMENTS PARTS A AND B: PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LTMTTS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $Is COMMENT (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC. ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NEW ARTERIALS ------------- ATLANTA AV BROOKHURST TO THE SA RIVER NA L 200,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BANNING AV BROOKHURST ST TO THE SA RIVER NA M 300,000 COUNTY AHFP BOLSA CHICA ST LOS PATTS AV TO PCH NA L 6H 8,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV WARD ST TO THE SA RIVER NA H 700,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD/BOLSACHICA BOLSA CHICA ST TO EDWARDS ST NA Jj 4WI 10,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GOTHARD ST MAIN ST TO ELLIS AV NA M 2,500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GOTHARD/HOOVER CENTER DR TO BOLSA AV NA H 5,500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HAMILTON AV BEACH BLVD TO NEWLAND ST NA H 5,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE SEAPOINT DR PCH TO PALM AV NA H 500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE SEAPOINT DR N/0 PALM AV TO EDWARDS ST NA L 1 ,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WALNUT AV SECOND ST TO BEACH BLVD NA H 8,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ------------ $41 ,700,000 c ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20—YEAR MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATIION IMPROVEMENTS PARTS A AND B: PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'s COMMENT (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BRIDGES ATLANTA/WILSON BRIDGE AT SA RIVER B L 5,500,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BANNING BRIDGE S_\NTA ANA RIVER B M 5,000,000 COUNTY PROJECT GARFIELD/GISLER BR BRIDGE AT SA RIVER B H 5,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HAMILTON AV BRIDGE VAIDEN,!:G A"' SA RI\"f::R B M 1 ,500,000 MC FADDEN AV BRIDGE WIDENING AT 405 FRWY B H 2,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE NEWLAND ST BRIDGE WIDENING AT 405 FRWY B H 2,000,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ------------ $21 ,000,000 ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20-YEAR MASTERPLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PART B: ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'S COMMENET (FUNDING, TIMING, ET( ------------------ --------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------------------------------- PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNALS ------------------------ ADAMS AV @ PICCADILLY ST INTERSECTION TS M 250,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV AND DELAWARE ST INTERSECTION TS L 330,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GRAHAM ST @ HEIL AV INTERSECTION TS L 130,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE LAKE STREET @ ORANGE AV INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE LAKE ST @ YORKTOWN AV INTERSECTION TS H . 75,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MAIN ST @ DELAWARE ST T`;TE.RSFCTT0N 1'S H 175,000 GAS. TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ 20TH ST INfERSECTfoN TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ 114TH ST INNTER EC"llON TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ 11TH ST INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ 6TH ST INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 CITY/OCTC OCUTT PROJECT 1988 SLATER AV @ SPRINGDALE ST INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WALNUT AV @ LAKE ST INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WALNUT AV @ HUNTINGTON ST INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WALNUT AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION TS H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE . WARNER AV @ ASH ST INTERSECTION TS M 125,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ DELAWARE ST INTERSECTION TS M 460,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE $2,445,000 ORANGE COUNTY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20 YEAR MASTERPLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PART B: ADDITIONAL PROJECTS PROJECT CATEGOTY PROJECT ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'S COMMENET (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC. ------------------ ---------------------------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------------------------------- INTERCONNECT SYSTEMS -------------------- ATLANTA AV 6TH ST TO E/CITY LIMITS IC H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BROOKHURST ST PCH TO N/CITY LIMITS IC H 50,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV BOLSA CHICA ST TO E/CITY LIMIT IC H 50,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV GOLDENWEST ST TO E/CITY LIMITS IC M 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HAMILTON AV 6TH ST TO E/CITY LIMITS IC H 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MAGNOLIA ST PCH TO N/CITY LIMITS IC H 150,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE SPRINGDALE ST TALBERT AV TO N/CITY LIMITS IC M 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV GOLDENWEST ST TO E;CITY LIMITS IC M 100,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE $750,000 ORANGE COUNTY C[Ti OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20-YEAR MASTERPLAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JUNE 28, 1988 OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CATEGORY PROJECT PART B: ADDITIONAL PROJECTS " ---------------- PROJECT COSTS IN STREET NAME PROJECT LIMITS CAPITAL TSM PRIORITY 1988 $'S COMMENT (FUNDING, TIMING, ETC. ) --------------------------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------------------------------- INTERSECTION WIDENINGS ---------------------- ADAMS AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ADAMS AV @ MAGNOLIA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ADAMS AV @ BUSHARD ST INTERSECTION RW/Ts L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ADAMS AV f BROOKIIURST ST I NTLIc:A•'CTION RW/TS 11 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BOLSA AV BOLSA CHICA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE BOLSA AV @ SPRINGDALE ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ BOLSA CHICA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ SPRINGDALE ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400:000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ EDWARDS ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ GOTHARD S'r iNTERSEC`I'ION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE EDINGER AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE ELLIS AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV @ MAGNOLIA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE GARFIELD AV @ BROOKHURST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HEIL AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE HEIL AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MCFADDEN AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MCFADDEN AV @ EDWARDS ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE MCFADDEN AV @ SPRINGDALE ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ WARNER AV INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTIONRtd/TS H 400:000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE PCH @ BROOKHURST ST INTERSE'CTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE SLATER AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION. RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV @ MAGNOLIA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE TALBERT AV @ BROOKHURST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ BOLSA CHICA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ EDWARDS ST INTERSECTION RW/TS L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ GOTHARD ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ NEWLAND ST INTERSECTION RW/TS M 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE WARNER AV @ MAGNOLIA ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400'000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ GOLDENWEST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS H 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ BEACH BLVD INTERSECTION RW/TS M 4001000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ NEWLAND ST INTERSECTION RW/TS L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ MAGNOLIA ST INTERSECTION RWTS L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ BUSHARD ST INTERSECTION RW/TS L 400,000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE YORKTOWN AV @ BROOKHURST ST INTERSECTION RW/TS L 400:000 GAS TAX AS AVAILABLE $17,200,000 DPW REQUEb f FOR CITY COUNCIL-, ACTION �03 Date July 20, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Paul E. Cook �i APPROVED BY CITY COUNCI- Submitted by: , City Administrate S_— 19_r!_D Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works V£ Subject: Main Street Between Orange and Pacific Coast Highway CITY CLERK' Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception DS� RS Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The travel lane width along Main Street between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, is less than the required width of twenty-four feet. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution, thereby waiving the minimum street width of twenty-four feet. ANALYSIS: Section 10.40.210, "Angle Parking Minimum Road Width", of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code prohibits angle parking upon any street where parking would diminish the width of the roadway to less than twenty-four feet. Main Street between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway, has angle parking which diminishes the width of the roadway to less than twenty-four feet. Angle parking along this portion of Main Street is in the best interest of the city; however, the minimum roadway width of twenty-four feet must be waived. Therefore, the Acting Director of Public Works recommends that the attached resolution be adopted. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Resolution LE:D RN:lw 1729g No 5/85 cap REQUEST FOR CITY COUNAL ACTION Date June 28, 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council //�- APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL I Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator�:J�_- -7 Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works crrrCLZNKi Subject: Pavement Repairs and Asphalt Overlay on Magnolia Street between Indianapolis and Adams Avenue; CC-733 Consistent with Council Policy? Q<] yes [ ] New Policy or Exception c?OO Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative.Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Procedures of the Orange County Transportation Trust Fund allow the City of Huntington Beach to receive 90% of'the County's share of the construction funds after the award of the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution, requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to transfer $65,000 to the City of Huntington Beach for the pavement repair and resurfacing of Magnolia Street. ANALYSIS: Upon the request of the City of Huntington Beach the Orange County Transportation Commission approved and allocated funds to help finance the repair and resurfacing of Magnolia Street between Indianapolis and Adams Avenue. The Department of Public Works prepared plans and specifications and solicited bids on May 26, 1988. The City Council accepted the low bid of $135,519 and awarded the contract to the R.J. Noble Company. FUNDING SOURCE: City Gas Tax Funds, Account #747330 $ 67,760.00 Orange County Transportation Trust Fund 67,759.00 Total S135,519.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reverse previous actions and not proceed with the project, or modify the project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution PEC:LGE:US:dw 1692g/21 ' REQUEST FA CITY COUNCIL- AG i ION Date August 6 1987 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator�qb,�-rl T G�TY C,013 11. Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Work Subject: LIST OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FANGE CO".. LEAGUE OF CITIES cizY Gam• Consistent with Council Policy? [XI Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Transportation Super Committee of the Orange County Division of the League of California Cities has requested the City Council to approve a list of the eight highest priority transportation improvement projects in the City. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the list of projects in Exhibit A as the eight most important transportation improvement projects for the City in priority order. ANALYSIS: The Orange County Division of the League of California Cities has established a Super Transportation Committee to determine the transportation improvement needs in Orange County. The mission of the Committee is to identify the current priority needs for the purpose of formulating a funding policy and strategy plan. In May, 1987, all Orange County cities submitted a list of priority projects based on their perceived needs. However, when the priority lists were solicited, the.prioritization criteria were not established. Now the Super Transportation Committee has established prioritization criteria, a copy, of which is attached, and have asked the cities to review the projects previously submitted and confirm or revise the project submittals by action of the City Council. The list of projects in Exhibit A is the same as those originally submitted to the Committee plus the addition of the Beach Boulevard Super Streets improvements including the widening of the intersection of Beach & Warner. In addition, the projects are listed in the City staff's recommended priority order. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable i ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Add or delete transportation improvement projects. 2. Change the priority order of the projects. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A / Letter Prioritization Criteria Plo 5/REC:dw r. EXHIBIT A 1. Implement Beach Boulevard Super Street improvements including widening intersection of Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard - $14,000.00 2. Construct connection of Hoover Street and Gothard Street between Bolsa Avenue and Mc Fadden Avenue - $5,500,000 3. Construct bridge over Santa Ana River to connect Garfield Avenue and Gisler Avenue - $5,000,000 4. Widen the Mc Fadden Avenue bridge over the 405 Freeway - $2,000,000 5. Widen the Newland Street bridge over the 405 Freeway - $2,000,000 6. Extend Hamilton Avenue from Newland Street to Beach Boulevard - $5,000,000 7. Construct 6biiQection of albert Avenue n� d Ellis Avenu.�tween F,dwward Street and Golden West Str - $3,00 , 0 B. Widen Gothard Street to 4 lanes between Warner Avenue and Main Street - $2,500,000 - A,,,. +wow ., '`.;# � i' +'o:.'•-'mi' + `a. r -27 T. x _ LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA'CITIES - a ., x _ r -Oq "MEMBER et71ES T fQt�ITAIN VALkEYr tAyPALMA` -- _ SAN TA ANA- - RA VGE - l� RXLERrON l0 AIAMiTOS = SEALBE6C1 - = [�-\-• r -T� 'GARDEN GROVE NEINPORrBEAGH = S-WIDN V t1 N I _IiWrIFIIGTON BEACH -0RANCE' k TUSTIN f _ Dn ' �+ --FB NAA4R4( . 2VINE- - PIACEN _` VILLA PARK; I V)J 1 O N� -COSTA MESA_e LPGUNA BEACH . -_SAN CLEMENTE = -WES?MINSTER - - CY?RESS LA HABRA SAN JUAN CARSTRANO - "_ :YORSA LINCA , n 1200 N,MAIN,SUTE M,SANTrAANA.CAUFORNIA92701 -714/972-0077 ' iuly 27, 1987 Dear Mayor: The Transportation Super-Committee-of the Orange County Division of the61eague of California Cities has been making tremendous progress this summer-. We- are preparing to present our report_ on the needs .for mobility in this County and -the mc-ans to finance them this September. - - - T'he attached list includes the needs submitted by-all cities for regional and Pleaseimprovement projects. Please review -the projects submitted-byyouur city and confirm or revise these project submittals by action of your-City Council -_- --'= during the month of August. _Only confirmed projects can be considered for the funding strategy. - Tine -criteria that will -be• used to evaluate projects have also been.included. for your information. `These criteria determine project ranking for-future fur.�dirg and implementation. If you have questions about project ubmittals or wish to change your project list, please-contact David Grosse at telephone A - nt=ber 647-5654. :Your prompt action on this request Will assure inclusion of your city's projects in September's -report. `--.--Thanks for your help. r _ Sincerely _ Dan Y rg w - Chairman, Transportation Super Committee - _ �. Mayor, City of Santa Ana _ : , - -17 y -- JUL 3 - - 198� f Ct11�OE NUNTINGTON BEAC CI7Y CO NC&L: OFFICE t-t -r - w_.-......_. -.Iwi-cmcnncwrt rimer e.r"—,r,ril6Anmho.0lnr-anfin 7rvitAf'FDRFS7DEM .- TRANSPORTATION SUPER COMMITTEE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES . ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION PRICRITIZATION CRITERIA CONCEPT MEASUREMENT Congestion Relief Measured in service level of improvements on a T.E. scale ? ofA - F Project. Readiness Months until construction started PS&E completed EIR ROW secured MPAH Completion Consistency with MPAH System Continuity Missing link in system Miles saved over alternate route Projected ADT Benef'_t/Cost ADT x Project Miles Projected Cost System Management Reduced Trip Demand Increased system efficiency Peak hour diversion Partial Funding % funding committed Geographic Distribution Location within County Bottleneck Relief Eliminate current bottleneck ; Need Current -demand Future projectionn Multi-Agency Number Agencies benefiting TRANSPORTATION SUPER COMMITTEE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA CONCEPT MEASUREMENT Congestion Relief Measured in service level of improvements on a T.E. scale ofA - F Project Readiness Months until construction started PS&E completed EIR Row secured MPAH Completion Consistency with MPAH System Continuity Missing link in system Miles saved over alternate route Projected ADT Benefit/Cost ADT x Project Miles Projected Cost System Management Reduced Trip Demand Increased system efficiency Peak hour diversion Partial Funding % funding committed Geographic Distribution Location within County Bottleneck Relief Eliminate current bottleneck Need Current demand Future projectionn Multi-Agency Number Agencies benefiting 3-3tet/-DPW REQUES' FOR CITY COUNCARCTION 5q- ti ID3 �GZ Ga Date April 5 198 9 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administratorw—� Gig Prepared by: Les G. Evans, Acting Director of Public Works (� Subject: Matching Funds from OCUTT and FAU for City Street Pro Aes. S��O�6, 5867, Sdr�B S8'6 q Consistent with Council Policy? ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception �o Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Resolutions by the City Council are required in order to apply for matching funds through the Orange County Transportation Commission for highway pavement rehabilitation projects. RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolutions for the request for matching funds from the Orange County Unified Transportation Trust (OCUTT) and Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds for the repair and rehabilitiation of arterial streets. ANALYSIS: The Orange County Transportation Commission has available for distribution to Orange County cities $6 million from the FAU fund and $4.5 million from the OCUTT fund. ,The Department of Public Works is applying for a portion of these funds, with the goal to do $1.3 million worth of street rehabilitation projects. One of the requirements is the availability of matching funds from the city. FUNDING SOURCE: 1988/89 CIty Gas Tax funds. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Forego or reduce amount of OCUTT and FAU matching funds. ATTACHMENTS: Resolutions LE:US:lw 1593g Plo 5/85 REQUES r FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIONRH 87-76 Date 3.927 Submitted to: Submitted by: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members �? Paul E. Cook, Acting City Administrator��� tst� Prepared by: 1 0013 p ,p Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administr. _ gr�mt'fn'ft5''geveIopme Subject: I PACIFIC TRAELER PARK / GITY G+� Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ) New Polic ion Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The owners of the Pacific Trailer Park have requested that the city analyze the impact to the park of street improvements to Atlanta Avenue, Delaware Street, Walnut Avenue, and Huntington Street. In response to that request, staff has been meeting with the owners of the Park and a representative of the tenants who resides in the Park. RECOMMENDATIONS: With regard to the Pacific Trailer Park, staff would recommend that the City Council authorize the following actions: 1. Authorize the Public Works Department to request proposals for the preliminary design for Atlanta, Delaware, Walnut and Huntington, adjacent to the Pacific Trailer Park; and 2. Authorize staff to prepare a development agreement in conjunction with the owners of the park that would set forth the mutual obligations of both parties. This agreement will be scheduled for Council consideration and action following its completion. ANALYSIS: During the meetings that staff has had with the owners of Pacific Trailer Park, the owners have stated their intention to continue the mobilehome park use on the property for the foreseeable future. In turn, city staff has indicated and ensured the owners that the city has no intention of extending Delaware Street southerly through the trailer park as long as the property remains a mobilehome park. However, staff has indicated the city's intent to widen Atlanta adjacent to the existing park, extend Walnut Avenue through the southwest corner of the Park, and ultimately eliminate or realign Huntington Street near its ultimate intersection with Walnut. The owners of 5 Plo 5185 Pacific Trailer Park have asked for more detailed information on how these street improvements would impact the existing coaches, access to the Park, the internal circulation, and onsite utilities. In order to answer the Park's concerns, preliminary designs for the proposed street widenings and relocations must be prepared. To expedite this process, consultant services would be required. Upon completion of the preliminary designs, it will then be possible to determine the impact of the needed street improvements, and in turn, delineate the responsibilities of the city/developer. It is envisioned at that time that the respective obligations of both parties could be incorporated into a development agreement between the Park owners and the city that would set forth those obligations and the timeframe for implementing those improvements. FUNDING SOURCE: The estimated amount that will be required to complete the preliminary design study is $10,000, and it is recommended that these funds be appropriated from the city's unappropriated fund balance. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: I. Defer action on the preliminary design study and preparation of a development agreement. 2. Complete the preliminary design studies in—house at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map PEC/DLB:lp 3350h SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-6-11' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP m . ATLANTA I STREET 1 I I 1 rLJ L1 i I L - - 1 i� � ♦ � mod'• z G ' m PACIFIC --.•� "'��-�'-b�� -- TRAILER/ PARK :-::%E' p C �• i v Off, Sf'•C�.,\ w ti r i i I �< vPw REQUESO FOR CITY COUNCIL .,ACTION Date September 23, 1987 / Y Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council7." Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Interim City Administrator �� / �4 Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Interim City Administrator Subject: Pavement Repairs, Asphalt Overlay and Landscaping Me s Adams Avenue Between Lake Street and Beach Boulevar C- Consistent with Council Policy? [A Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception T'es -&S,?/ 7 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: j Statement of Issue; Procedures of the Orange County Transportation Trust Fund allow the City of Huntington Beach to receive 90% of the County's share of the construction funds after the award of the contract. Recommendation: Approve the resolution, requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to transfer $80,000.00 to the City of Huntington Beach for the pavement repair and resurfacing of Adams Avenue. Analysis: Upon the request of the City of Huntington Beach, the Orange County Transportation Commission approved and allocated funds to help finance the repair and resurfacing of Adams Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard. The Department of Public Works prepared plans and specifications and solicited bids. City Council accepted the low bid of $235,668.00 and awarded the contract to Sully-Miller Contracting Company. Funding Source: City Gas Tax Funds, Account #747100 $264,234.00 Orange County Transportation Trust Fund 88,517.00 $352,751.00 Alternative Action: Reverse previous actions and not proceed with the project, or modify the project. Attachments: Resolution PEC:US:lw Pl 0 5/85 1: 103 REQUE�T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION , Date January 16 1987 _ -- _ _= CITY Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council '�� DY •'p- 19 � Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administr —s---�'"'� Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works J GIT GLL Subject: PAVEMENT REPAIR, ASPHALT OVERLAY, CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING OF MEDIANS FOR BROOKHURST STREET BETWEEN BANNING AVENUE AND THE TALBERT CHANNEL (O.C.F.C.C. ) Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception 7 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE.: Need for resolution to obtain funding from Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund (OCUTT) . RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution which is in comformance and required by the Orange County Transportation Trust Fund, in order to fund and forward (into our account) their portion of the project. ANALYSIS : On January 6 , 1986 , City Council approved Resolution Number 5617 requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to allocate monies from the Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund for the improvements of Brookhurst Street and agreed to provide City matching funds . On April 14 , 1986 , the Orange County Transportation Commission approved $125 , 000 . 00 for Brookhurst Street between Banning Avenue and the Orange County Flood Control Channel (Talbert Channel) . On October 6 , 1986 , City Council authorized a call for bids. The bids were received , opened and awarded to Blair Paving, Incorporated on January 1, 1987 . FUNDING SOURCE : Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund: $125 , 000 . 00 City Gas Tax Fund in Account #746880 : $262 , 344 . 80 $387 , 344 . 80 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny approval of the resolution and forfeit County matching funds . ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Location Maps CWT:PEC :RAM:dw PIO 5/85 103 REQUES T FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date October 23, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council nn � Vy-D�Y CITY COUNG' Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrator(Cwj 11-3 19 Prepared by: Paul Cook, Director of Public Work_ss� � 1 CITY CL Subject: Additional SB300 Expenditure Authorizati ' Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Statement of Issue: Council authorization is required in order to expend Senate Bill 300 revenues received by the city. Recommendation: 1 . Authorize the expenditure of $374, 303 . 36 in additional (second year) SB300 road maintenance funds . 2 . Approve the transfer of these funds from the Gas Tax fund balance (wherein they were deposited) into an expenditure account ( 743003 ) to be established for this purpose. Analysis : On January 3 , 1986, the city received it ' s allocation of $625, 627 . 75 in Senate Bill 300 road maintenance funds . They were deposited into a revenue account when received and appropriated into an expenditure account by a Council action of January 21, 1986 . These funds were the city' s share of 215 million dollars allocated sta-.ewide under the terms of SB300 for road maintenance. On October 9 , 1986, the State Controller remitted a check for an addi- tional $374 , 303 . 36 in SB300 funds to the city for the final ( second year) funding under this program. Council authorization to expend these funds is now required. Those funds from this distribution which are unexpended by September 30, 1986, must be refunded to the State. Funding Source: State of California: $374 , 303 . 36 Alternative Action: Do not allocate the funds and return them to the State. Attachment: State "Remittance Advice" sheet received with the State warrant. 0 CWT:PEC:JS:lw Plo 5/85 TREASURER CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P 0 BOX 711. HUNTINCTON BEACH CA 926A(3 REMITTANCE ADVICE SECTION 2126 OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE ALLOCATION KENNETH CORY , STATE CONTROLLER , STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 10/09/06 85/86 FISCAL YEAR BASE AMOUNT S 1 , 62a ,7SM . 70 CITY APPOR . AMT . S7A ,SOS . S6 CITY RATIO OF RASE AMOUNT 0 . 00092AA202'7 DED . AMT . 0 . 00 TOTAL REMITTED $ S7A ,300 . a6 REQUE8_,- - FOR CITY COUNCIL.-ACTION Date August .4, 1986 AP Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council OVEB'By Gy'T, CIL Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director Public Works '-' c Subject: PAVEMENT REPAIR, ASPHALT OVERLAY, CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING--O MEDIANS ON ADAMS AVENUE BETWEEN BUSHARD STREET AND THE SANTA ANA RIVER; CC-694 Consistent with Council Policy? [x] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: RiN STATEMENT OF ISSUE• 5 Need for resolution to obtain funding from Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution which the Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund requires in order to fund a portion of the project. ANALYSIS: I On January 6, 19 86, City Council approved Resolution Number 5613 requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to allocate funds for the improvement of Adams Avenue and.agreed to provide matching funds. i On April 14, 1986, the Orange County Transportation Commission approved $246,575 for Adams Avenue between Bushard and..the Santa Ana:Fiver. FUNDING SOURCE: Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund: $ 246,575.00 City Gas Tax Fund in.Account #746940: $ 699,632.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny approval.of the resolution and forfeit County matching funds. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution PEC:US:ik PI O 4/84 /-dd/ REQUE% FOR CITY COUNCLI A N ffi` Date May 12. 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Y CITY ooGIL D$ Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Ad inistra 0,V VLO /9 �1 k It Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Work 01,17, GITY Subject: Rejection of a Portion of Public Access Ea in 11716 Consistent with Council Policy? [Xj Yes [ ] New Policy or-Exception .5' S Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Atta hments: Statement of Issue: An offer of dedication to the city of a walkway along the frontage of the Portofino Cove pr 'ect at the end of Countess Drive in Huntington Harbour has been offered by., a Development Corporation. Recommendation: 1. Adopt the attached :�-esolu,:i.on -ejec' i_ng a por J—on of an irrevocable offer to dedicate a public access easement in Tract 11716. . rr la Develownt Corporation to -remove rtion of e ng walk within e idge Park:- I - 1 ` a ��Yec,1-S1c�F� 46wn,+.e \•et' Rll V Coq, T�[ �'prnw��sSid1� Ce', CJ�� Ihrenf "� rlP�uJew-711gw, Analysis: 600p+161) o-F Res . 5'6S7 3 , D%recT S��jNi�� /N �qr 1UUS /�'St, �S The California Coastal Commission required Mola Development Corporation to develop a walkway around the frontage of their Portofino Cove Project and to make an offer to any public agency to accept dedication of the easement as a public walkway. In order for Mola Development to satisfy the concerns and requirements of the city regarding this project prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy, a disposition of the offer of dedication of the walkway is necessary. Staff is recommending that the city reject the offer of dedication of the walkway. Acceptance of the offer of dedication would require the city to maintain the walkway but, more importantly, place the liability on the city for problems occurring on the walkway. The city's Planning Commission when considering this project required a public access from the public parking lot to the vista point at the north end of the project but not around the entire project. In response to the Coastal Commission's requirement, Mola Development constructed a walkway around the perimeter of the project. The southerly terminus of the walkway .is on public property in Seabridge Park. This pier type facility repre- sents a potential liability to the city because park visitors can climb onto this walkway and jump or dive into shallow water. Staff feels that this portion of the walkway must be removed as soon as possible. Approval of the first recormendation will absolve the city from maintenance and liability requirements of the walkway. The city has previously declined to accept the dedication or maintenance of channel walkways in the Huntington Harbour area. Also, approval of the second recommended action will require removal of the portion of the walkway from the public park and beach. The Planning Commission's desire for a public walkway to the vista point is not affected by the staff's recommendation. PIO 4/84 Request for Council Action Rejection if a Portion of Public Access Easements in Tract 11716 May 12, 1986 Page 2 Funding Source: No expenditure of funds is involved in the recommended action. Alternative Action: 1. Take no action on the offer of dedication. 2. Accept the offer of dedication. CWT:PEC:JH:lw Ea LEGAL DESCRIPTION The City of Huntington Beach hereby rejects all of Lot 'H' of Tract No. 11716 in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, per map recorded in Book 537, Pages 17 through 19 of Miscellaneous Maps of said County together with the easement area for walkway purposes along Lots 7 through 17 as shown on said map; Excepting therefrom the area described as follows: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 'H' ; THENCE-NORTH 49034'33" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 250.33 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 77057'42" EAST, 21.04 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 49034'33" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 254.40 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE SOUTH 61000'00" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 'H' , 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°00'00" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 61000'00" WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 34.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (CONTAINING 2796 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.) ZONING INDEX MAP 9-5-11 10• -11 OM 9 I LEGEND PROJEC�T 19-6-10-SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE j / 7 L OCQ ON DM 17 1 S DM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 AL \S• 8- - -S-II 21- 11 22 -11 2 -5-1I 24 DM 2� 21 25 26 DM.27 LL30-�-5-11 29-5-11 ' 27- -1! -5-11 2 -11 AM 35 DM 34 D4/33 N ON 30 w0, , �n32- II 33-5-i1 Y�N3o - I 35 S II 36 •11 DM I OM 37 1 38 39' DM 40 5-6-II 3-6-II 2 -11 I-6-11 6-6-q OM 4 DM 3 42 DAB I DIA 6 DM I � ZDM � 9-6-II -6-II Ih -II -11 7-6-10 8!6-10 OM10 DM 1213 OM7 BOMB CITY OF 14 DM DM19 HUNTINGTON BEACH i - ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORMA ' 24-6 1 ! 9-KID �. DM 29 �.22 01t•Iia *no.*q w� PLANNING 0 wao SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 19-5- 11 SCALt ..Et, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A& ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP EDINGER AVE cl�y QF BrAc L CF-R ---- ------ ------- ---- M-CA- 7 CF R 1 _ c' CF-A 14 -cl;4 pw 96 0 4o CF-p q:. Wo lb O 00 REQUES FOR CITY COUNCIP-ACTION Date December 31 , 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council l' i Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat 4U Submitted by: P Y Prepared by: Paul E." Cook, Director of Public Works ��� Street Improvement Projects; Orange County Unified Subject: Transportation Trust (OCUTT) Fund Streets & Roads Component Consistent with Council Policy? [)9 Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception 00. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:"i Statement of Issue : The procedures of the Orange County Unified Transportation Trust (OICU""T) Fund Streets and Roads Component require that the city request inciusion of projects into this three year road improvement program. Recommendations : Adopt the attached resolutions requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission to include in the OCUTT Streets and Roads Component the - Follow-ing projects : - 1 . Adams Avenue between Bushard Street and the Santa Ana River . 2 . Bolsa Chica Street between Edinger and Rancho Avenues . 3 . Brookhurst Street between Adams and Garfield Avenues . 4 . Adams Avenue between Magnolia and Newland Streets . 5 . Brookhurst Street between Banning Avenue and the Orange County Flooc Control Channel south of Bushard Street . 6 . Warner Avenue between Edwards and Springdale Streets . 7 . Warner Avenue between Magnolia and Newland Streets . 8 . Yorktown Avenue between Ward and Magnolia Streets . 9 . Magnolia Street between Adams and Indianapolis Avenues . 10 . Adams Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Lake Street . 11 . Bolsa Avenue between Edwards and Springdale Streets . 12 . Warner Avenue between Algonquin Street and Edgewater Lane . 13 . Garfield Avenue between the Orange County Flood Control Charnel and Magnolia Street . 14 . Warner Avenue between Graham and Algonquin Streets . 15 . Goldenwest Street between Warner and Heil Avenues . 16 . Gothard Street between McFadden and Edinger Avenues . 17 . Talbert Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street . An&lvsis : Recent legislation has provided a portion of the interest from the Count'- ' s Local Transportation Fund to be available for financing of street improve- ment projects . The Orange County Transportation Commission will administer and allocate the funds thru the Orange County Unified Transportation Trust Fund (OCUTT) Streets and Roads Component . The project is intended to run for a three year period only . Cities have the opportunity to submit projects this January for all three years of the program. Our projects will be in competition for funds with those of other Orange County cities. T ~ W cp" CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS v I RESOLUTION NEo a368-oE CIITY O 1N2.r976 J LEGEND' y FREEWAY STREE7 :APAary 41• MAJOR 45= PRIMARY 30.000 SEZONDARY 20.000 NOTE _ SOLO OWES CUTE E['STrf. ftlgwT Or aw, / MOT MEZESSYELY "TAWE 440T W ■uT y D&3.(C LWES 00"TE ARE&$ WHERE NO of WAY ExiSTS {. a or 71 \ ;I 1 % \ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ` ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA r .3 Request for City Council Action Street Improvement Projects December 31, 1985 Page 2 Funding Source : Approved projects would be budgeted for 1986/87 . The .city must provide matching funds for all approved projects . Funds are available from Gas Tax accounts . Attachments : l . - Resolutions 2 . Project Location Naps CWT:PEC :DRN: lw tz C C; OF HUFIJl -,COMMUNICATION =aul Cco7, From Bruce Gilmer Director of-_ Public 'NIorks T-raf-I"ic Engine-er S C tL Eulsa Chica Median Date Sept . 13 , 1984 Puntington Riviera Driveway This report outlines the nature of the Bolsa Chica Street median islar.71 `,esirin and the relationship of the Huntington Riv.;_'f_,ra driveway (S.-Lark Dr. ) to t'iat design . in summarv, the dr-J".v-1-,way �v'as riot inc,"O-ided in th,e access considerations during the _,-_:sign ass d;­_% i-O it- left turn' pe-l-,ets p:�,::�:idled nc-rt_'. of t'.-le 1-1;a_rner A,"Tenue intersection. The tire' Depal-tr-nt 1,as r --ed) regarding access tc, the e soor(?ed bv memo (copy attac''_- subJect deve-Iopment for emergency response. Lc;. ation an",� Descriltion Chic-- Street is a nc'­th - south hiq"'Iway, _-_I.assifie,' ;-'s a- art:---Ial in '--',e Master Plan. of Arterial Hiq_ .iwa-,/s. It is p J c.a r r y ;,envy traffic -mvements, an,,f to have -A-_.ted, C cc:'s s ( thru the use of median to major trafl::i.--., movc..T.�Elnts cu.-reiiC.1- T' 1'.11; i---.::3 'Wi4-1 .-h -o :`A3 Lh min.oi. t-af-fic floc..s soull L_ '. ':'atos , one-quarter mi--,-e south of W:_+-,_-ner 1',venu:7'- , ' :--ee L --d s-s-c- C h S c o t i n e C t t,,--, t 1- - p p o s;- :1 tll-e 4-ve_ 6,,-,_.-aents proposed for the Boise. C h i c a p.-r e i�'r".'e d 1 as the major h-ghway supporting travel, int- anc3 of -L:gat area. Chica Street T,,Iarner Aven--e. e-periences '--eavv ]--,c.'-.h from Bolsa Chica ofit'-_o Warner (currently -:_rroposed as a dual lelft turn) , and froln Warner Avo-nue norc f-i, ' 4ns4:--'.'iica (both left and :c.i .,:ht turns) . :his —tel :-c- t 1. c i-. o�7ili- b2 niodif`!.-c'd to multi-plhase operation in tl-� n�-,:-tZ f-Lit-r-a . [I::) ft­:-ther compound tht� traffic Si tuaticn , there arc; se,I-­__­.'_aen ' 17' drive-v7ays on Bo' sa C'nica :')etween A, ,*----,Ie ,and '-'":reet. Entry and exit -,'.Ioveiaen­'__s ai: 'ese ions difficult as -;--a traffic _. :-.comes !_-_co�.- int- t fic "-. fhe Riv-.__az_-a Condominui,", _J.:S locat.^d he tea :U­n tool:,,_. Chi--a and reen Street, sout."I of Dearc.1---! -ere are ni-nety- in t-I-ie deve'.0-p-m.enc A 'co-_)v of the Fire Der.,-.rt-,wnts -araina-i.:;n of the S4 -01-1` the cop,117-lex `_s _L . 411 of :lie units take converien access rom Czeea t 1: J a c Barr c:tl Cl a, w,:­7 t -n d u E: S-ia r, B 1-e z:, he .-ining f il E t y- i c l S- havino access Sh:-,.-K ')_riVE'. e u __!�S th�: .-nits Z J C J c i r a g e s h h i n -I e 2 i n i i_) the a act for _ s s e C 11Aer c to ''a1.11 Cook :1olsa Chica _-edian Sept. 1.3 , i..984 Page 2 Median Island Design and Construction The median island design was done using standard design parameters , .taking into account the need for maximizing access to the adjacent properties while accommodating traffic movements and maintaining safety. The Warner Avenue intersection design was considered of major importance , as was the Pearce intersection which serves a substantial residential population. Following the design of those facil.ites , consideration of the other turn__ng opportunities was made, resulting in the design currently being constructed. It affords turning opportunities 1--or most of the activities near the Warner intersection, while controlling the many r-oovements into and out of the multiple driveways in the area. The depth of the _additional turn pockets was based on the anticipated usage of the movement given the adjacent development. The driveway (Shark Dr. ) leading into the Huntington Riviera complex is located thirty-three feet (33' ' ) from the ens' of the nearest transition curve. That distance is one-third the :nominal acce-ot.able distance for a left turn_ pocket. Consequently no further consideration was given to providing an addi -ional turn pocke4- since it -v%ould have been unsafe to do so with those dimen- sions . ]Furthermore,, persons desiring to gain access to that driveway r1a� do so from the turn pocket provided at Pearce by rila Li ng a le�_al U-t-urn (CVC Sections 21651. and 22102) 1-mi early, persons desiring to go north on Bolsa Chica may use the 'left turn pocket south of the drivewav and slake a U-turn to go nor`,--,!', . Emergency Response The Tire Department was asked to respond to statements that their access to the ccmplex -.aas hampered by the presence of tr median without a turn pocket. A copy of their reply is -attached, J Feasibility of Modifying the Median Island The possibi-lity of modifying the median island to provide a left turn pocket into th. complex does exist. . Such a modifi.:;i.tion cgould requ Lre reducing t'1:� e,cisting southbound pocket from one hundred fi-fty feet (150 ' ) to one h,-lndred feet (100 ' ) and creating a northbound left turn pocket of eighty-five feet (85 ' ) into the driveway (Shark Dr. ) . The dirnens.icns noted above are substand=rd., and such a modification is not recommended for safety reasons . Specifically, the distances noted do not permitt acceptable decelleration of ve"hi.cles traveling at 45 mph when attempting to ma,_euver and make a safe stop if required to yield to oncominc, traffic. ":'hose are the reasons the design did not include, the poc':e .s or _ginally. BiIG: 1-.: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Bruce Gilmer From Thomas Poe Traffic Engineer Deputy Fire Marshal Subject Median - Bolsa Chica Date September 6, 1984 The fire department has reviewed response routes to the Riviera Condominiums at Bolsa Chica and Pearce in District 165 to determine a fire department need for a left turn pocket in the proposed median on Boise Chica Road for turning west into the complex from northbound Bolsa Chica. In 'analyzing fire department response into the area, it was determined that a left turn pocket was not required because fire department units would be making access from Bolsa Chica southbound or from Green Street. TP:ml 1808f - GREEN ---AR 4896 481912 892 14,995 486� , 4897 489 I L 84 BARRACUDA _4906 06 m 4905 m 4902 024 90844907 4909 A4911 912 . 4912 49, 4916 --_1 _ _4 18 �1 �- e2 CD �� i —1 -- -- - - —i --------- —1 O— � m °' Q, 1 0m 1 0 W A W w O, 3. I o 1 1 U)m t 1 I n m 493G I 1 1 1 --- -1 cz I m l--_ +� --r-ii- 1 �N 4938 —� D BREAM t , , , I -.. 4942 _n - Ul 4948 M Z L � PO 4952 1 0 I •.� 951 -y O - - / I 4956 1 4955 SNAPPER ; D a95 m— 4957 _ l 4962 ( A z .• 4961 -__ 4964 4961 962 t� r-- 1 x c D I--- 4366 f 4966 + l f� 496 7 �-- 4965 __I 4968 : : . . . z m U) N 4969 1 4968 O 4967 4972 = 4968 1 z 4972 _ J 971 tl __ 4972 4971 I --� 1__ 4976 4976 a973 �i 4975 O 4975 __r-'4978 1 A. 4977 l 4978 , J498B 978 : [-4 _� �- 4981 L- 4982 .' .' 4982 1_ 982 1 4986 4987 t- 4986 1 _ PORPOISE 4992 c c A VE. ao , 1T ' \ GAS I STA T/pN II a - i i I I WA RNER A M 1 - t ' t 1 t t G/-1 SEMF .SHARK T/RE STORE /1V3U9,INC A/OME HOME PEST4 Up.4NT ✓F EX/ST R/!N EX/sr C[/R43 e GUTT R I I li LL- Gnome t _ RIB cLT) ►l-I. IQ 5 --�� a srea...�. c•.•.,� .r_.s.-,. - �=,y,--_°°•e9_—.ss;.:.=. ...-.-'r-+.M-"--:_-:- ;.,r.-�_._-�-:-� -- >�'+e*a`-}-- V`i �J�/•r1 'Y'-. =-- - - aS4....--�-as,.-:^�r:-- �a+t...,. - - -_ - __ _ - - V 1 II NUd1,3 10c i ►OG �j EXIST R/W �`ex1sr C&�PB GUTrE�P j I I I j'XiST / /w-) /wG C'�NTER I pFF/CE BUGS. OFFICE SLOGS 4ii /00 .300 Mi/u ENO Z.4/VE L/NE li PEARCE AVE. 20. HUNTINGTON EX/ST R/`t/� EX/S T CU�4B � G UTTER� \5/4 -- .. rpn���. i. 3wx... ' - --= -:,t,..,., >�• _ .ate/O��"~`A`-, .- '�:. .r,.- .:,.a=yr /3 0 'EXIST CURB • 30 �• PEARCE A VE. r w A PTS VA C A N T LOT S HOPP/ G Est/TF,p EXIST R/W� EX/ST CL1.4B 6617-7'ER-� -�J � 77 - .r19 A7 SIGNAL AHEAD'S'S'11 EX/57- R1W EX/ST CURB GUTTER NOTE F//V,4L. S/GN/NG AMD STR/P/MG TO ,BE DONE B - CITY- SIGNING NO TES S TR/ C�/NG r' /DA I/ -ME-N T MA Rif/MG' NO TES 160�- INSTALL SIGN. _ i /DA/A/ T 4'. WDE WHITE I f PEARCE ST. � �,0 SCALE: 1"= 200' cn CHARLENE CR. _ U Q Z V W I I � m I U I i I WARNER AVENUE i i BOLSA CHICA STREET. MEDIANS - LOCAL CIRCULATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 'mad w' INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION tv y � x�'' HUNTINGTON BEACH3-f To Charles Thompson 6 - N/� From Les Evans ' City Administrator Yj� Aa;_X_ City Engineer Subject Bolsa Chica Median at Date Oct. 1, 1984 Shark Drive Bruce Gilmer, Traffic Engineer and myself met with about 15 residents of the Huntington Riviera Homeowners Association to exchange thoughts on the Bolsa Chica Street median island. The present design does not provide left turn access from the Shark Drive entrance to the development. According to the association representatives, there are 98 units in the condominiums. They feel that the City erred in providing left turn access from Bolsa Chica into the commercial development at the corner of Warner and Bolsa Chica rather than providing left turn access to Huntington Riviera. It was agreed by City staff and the homeowners group that there were several alternatives: 1. Leave the median opening as it is with left turn access to the commercial development at Warner and none for the Huntington Riviera. 2. Relocate the median opening to provide left turn access for Huntington Riviera but not for the commercial deve- lopment at Warner. 3. Remove the raised median island from the north end of the Warner left turn pocket to the Shark Drive entrance and replace it with striping for a two-way left turn lane. Since the median island already exists, and since alternatives two and three raise as many new problems as they solve, Engineering staff recommends leaving the median island as is for 6 months. During. t:his period the Huntington , Riviera homeowners can adjust to the new median and circulation patterns. At the suggestion of the homeowners association, street lighting at both the Bolsa Chica and Green entrances to the development will be upgraded. Red curb will be provided on Bolsa Chica near Shark Drive and considered on Green at Shark Drive to improve sight distance. New traffic patterns at the intersections of Green and Pearce and Bolsa Chica and Pearce vjill be evaluated. The impact of the median island on traffic on Green will be evaluated.. At the end of the six month period another meeting with the home- owners association will be held and information exchanged. A final recommendation will .then be made to Council: LE:lw 1 �.RI Ftl R I C I RI . - I . R2 C4I R2 I• i I MC I R R2 i I Ip I�I 11 R3 _ I ,I R3 R•3 z R3 ,I C2 �.� AVE ll • �-S pw REQUEST r OR CITY COUNCIL V .CTION Date January 8, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council CO C'� p& � Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator ©; C � Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: SB 300 Expenditure Authorization Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Except Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue: Council authorization is required in order to expend Senate Bill 300 revenues received by the City. RecomTendation: 1. Authorize the expenditure of. $625,627.75 in SB 300 road maintenance funds. 2. Approve the transfer of said funds from the.Gas Tax fund balance (wherein they were deposited) ' into an expenditure account (743000) established for this purpose. s Analysis: On January 3, 1986, the City received it's allocation of $625,627.75 in Senate Bill 300 - road maintenance funds. They were deposited into a revenue account and must now be appropriated into an expenditure account for disbursement. These .funds are the City's share of 215 million dollars allocated statewide under the terms of SB 300. They can be expended only for road maintenance and must be utilized within calendar year 1986. Those funds unexpended by January 1987 must be refunded to the State. The Public Works Department has developed a plan for the expenditure of these funds through our ongoing road maintenance program.within the time frame rea_uried. These funds should not be confused with SB 429 ("OCUTI') funds which are part of a three year county program for road in-provement. Funding Source: State of California: $625,627.75 Alternative Action: Do not allocate the funds and refund them to the State. Attachment: State "Remittance Advice" sheet received with State warrant. CG�T:PEC:JS:dw / (/ PIO 4/84 y CITY ENGINEER P O BOX 711 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 REMITTANCE ADVICE gGt44-!' 24$n-OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE ALLOCATION KENNETH COPY , STATE CONTROLLER , STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 / 23 / 85 SECTION 2107 ALLOCATION. $ 1616570 . 41 CITY APPOP . AMT . 5 625627 . 75 CITY RATIO OF 2107 ALLOC . 0 . 00910004000 DED . AMT . 5 0 . 00 �7•::AL=�w-Ft`Eµ1u11 �T�E?t� `- 5 r.-.�.�-,$$5';6=�>7��"Y7v5�: REQUE� : FOR CITY COUNCIL- ACTION o / Date July 15, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 0 i Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director Public Works- "IT Y c Subject: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS REGULATIONS Consistent with Council Policy? [A Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception PCs saw Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Federal Highway Administration has issued new regulations regarding the employment of Professional Consultants for Federal and Urban projects. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve the attached Resolution; thereby adopting the new Federal Highway Administration regulations pertaining to the employment of Professional Con- sultants. 2. Authorize Staff to solicit requests for proposals for the Brookhurst Bridge and roadway widening project. ANALYSIS: The improvements of Brookhurst Street is a multi-phase project. Phase two consists of widening the bridge north of Pacific Coast Highway. Plans and Specifications for this phase are to be provided by a consultant selected under Federal Highway Administra- tion guidelines. The request for proposals has been prepared but cannot be let to consultants until Council formally adopts, by Resolution, the new regulations pertain- ing to the selection of Consultants. Staff has reviewed the new regulations, and con- curs that they should be adopted. Council's approval of the Resolution should then be followed by an authorization to solicit proposals. FUNDING SOURCES: Consultant design costs will be shared with the Federal Highway Administration on the following basis: Agency Percentage of Costs Federal Highway Administration 86.220 City (Local Gas Tax Funds) 13.750 100.00 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny approval of the Resolution and forego any federal assistance or�,preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Brookhurst Bridge Widening Project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution PEC:DN:ik r P10 4/84 e REQUE* FOR CITY COUNC,_ ACTION Date September 25, 1985 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ��G1ti Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator G1�.1 GO Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: BROOKHURST BRIDGE AND STREET WIDENING DE IGN �, c cITY Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Excepti n Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The Federal Highway Administration requires special procedures be used to: -l. Select consultants 2. Procedures must be approved by City Council 3. Request for proposal for consultants must be approved by City Council RECOMMENDATION: Approve special -procedures for Federal Highway Administration and request for proposals for. Brookhurst Bridge and Street Design. ANALYSIS : The Federal Highway Administration requires special procedures when selecting a design consultant where there is federal participation. The special procedures for FAU projects is Attachment 1. The Federal Highway Administration requires City Council approval of Requests for :Proposal prior to advertising. These approvals must be sent to Cal Trans local assistance before participation in consultant design pro- jects will be authorized: FUNDING SOURCE: Federal Highway 83. 17% , Gas Tax 16 . 83% . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Do not approve. PEC:BW:dw PIO 4/84 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FAU CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURES I. Professional Consultants These consultants are retained by the Public Works Department to augment the department's professional capabilities during peak workload periods or other critical periods and/or to provide specialized services not presently available to the department. II. Invitation - Standard The City shall invite a minimum of three well-qualified and available consultants to submit proposals for professional services required for a particular project. A file of consultants' qualifications, specialities, past experience with the city, and outside references shall be maintained for this invitation process. The city shall include Disadvantage Business/Women Business Enterprise in this process whenever possible. Consultants are also requested to utilize Disadvantage Business/Women Business Enterprise as Subconsultants whenever possible. The consultants shall document, in writing to the City, the efforts made to obtain Disadvantage Business/Women Business Enterprise Subconsultants. Consultants shall be encouraged to file their qualifications with the department. The city shall use the open-selection method including advertising in a newspaper and/or technical publication and accepting reasonable requests by other consultants to compete, to the maximum extent practicable. III. Request for Proposals (R.F.P.) A Request for Proposal shall be prepared which explains DB/WBE requirements for "Good Faith Effort", defines the scope of the project, identifies the various project components and phases, outlines the services required of the consultant and services provided by the city. -1- For Federal-aid Highway Projects, Request for Proposal (R.F.P.) will be made part of the public record of the City Council and will be publicized in a newspaper, and/or technical publication and will be sent out to DB/WBE firms. IV,. Consultants Proposal The consultant must submit a proposed schedule as part of the proposal. Each consultant is required to submit in a separate sealed envelope, a proposed fee for services. A separate envelope, with consultants' time schedule, a discussion and description of previous related experiences, the proposed project staffing, with resumes of key people, and other data pertinent to the project. The department, in all but exceptional cases, requires that fees be submitted as cost plus net fee with "not-to-exceed" amount for all professional services. The submittal must include hourly rates and other cost information as supporting data. If the project is such that a "not-to-exceed" proposal is not readily obtainable, then some other method of fee proposal such as hourly or lump sum may be allowed by the Request for Proposal. V. Consultant Evaluation - Standard Projection An Evaluation Committee consisting of the City Engineer (or his designee), a section manager, and the project engineer will evaluate the proposals received from the consultants. The committee's selection will be approved by the Director of Public Works and recommended to the City Council for their final approval for services costing more than $2,500.00. For services $2,500.00 or under, the Director and City Administrator may approve the award. The factors to be considered by the committee in the review of the consultant proposals include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Consultants understanding of project scope. b. Consultants past performance on similar projects. c. Consultants present workload and ability to meet proposed project schedule. d. Familiarity with department standards, construction specifications and procedures. -2- e. The City's prior experience with the consultant. f. Involvement of Disadvantage Business/Women Business Enterprise in the proposal. g. Consultant's efforts in soliciting Disadvantage Business/Women Business Enterprise. h. Any other circumstances pertinent to the project. i. The "Top Three" consultants will be invited for an oral interview. j. The consultant's fee will be the start of negotiation. If no satisfactory agreement can be reached, the second consultant will be asked to negotiate. If no satisfactory agreement can be reached, the. third consultant will be asked to negotiate. If no satisfactory agreement can be reached, the City will readvertise the project. VI. Procedure From time-to-time, these. procedures may be amended by the Director of Public Works. Amendments shall be forwarded to the City Administrator for his approval. VII. R.F.P. Review Procedures *Maximum Items Possible Points **Consultant Score a. Proposed Scope of 5 1 2 3 4 5 Services consistent with R.F.P. b. Ability of consultant 3 to meet project schedule c. Past performance on 3 similar projects d. Familiarity with 3 departmental procedures in specification prepara- tion -3- *Maximum Items Possible Points **Consultant Score 1 2 3 4 5 e. Past performance on 3 city contracts f. D.B./W.B.E. involvement 3 *** g. Effort by consultant to 3 solicit D.B./W.B.E. participation Pass/Fail h. Other pertinent items Weight assigned/ per project * Based upon relative importance of item as determined for each specific project. ** Consultant key 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. *** No effort eliminates consultant -4- 0442g BROOKHURST BRIDGE AND STREET WIDENING I. Introduction The City of Huntington Beach is seeking an engineering consultant to design a bridge and roadway widening from the Talbert Channel (DO-2) to Pacific Coast Highway. The project will be financed by Federal Highway Funds. The construction is located in an environmental sensitive area. Precautions must be described in specifications to protect the wetlands during construction. There are two other projects in the planning stages located in the same vicinity: Orange County Flood Control is planning on widening and providing a new ocean outlet and Caltrans has a project to widen Pacific Coast Highway to six lanes. Recognition and accommodations of these projects must be in the plans and specifications. The engineering consultant will provide with City and other agencies liasons. The consultant shall prepare complete plans, specifications and estimates. II. Scope of Work The following description is not intended to limit the work required, but is intended to clarify areas of particular concern: A. Hydrology Report The bridge design will require a hydrology report prior to design. The consultant in the RFP shall demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the Caltrans and the Orange County EMA method of hydrology calculations. The report must be approved by the City and Orange County before the design begins. Caltrans will not be able to review the report prior to the complete submittal due to time constraints. B. Bridge Design Appendix 1 is a copy of the bridge report prepared by Caltrans. Appendix II, Environmental Assessment gives a description of the project and its exact location. The bridge design shall allow for a lengthing in the future. -1- C. Roadway Design Appendix II gives the proposed roadway design. Part of the roadway will be in Caltrans right-of-way. The connection to Pacific Coast Highway should accommodate the future widening of that highway with as little reconstruction as possible. The design shall not require work in the wetlands areas. D. Permits The consultant and city. shall prepare applications for all permits required. The permits needed are as follows: 1. Orange County Flood Control 2. Caltrans District 07 3. Coast Guard 4. " Coastal Commission 5. State Fish and Game 6. Federal Fish and Wildlife T. Army Corp of Engineers E. Agency Liason The consultant will be required to attend meetings with Caltrans FAU and Orange County to be sure the design meets the requirements of these agencies. F. City Liason THe consultant will report to the Project Engineer on a weekly basis. The reports will outline problem areas and discuss progress. III. FAU City Consultant Selection Method The Appendix III describes the method the city uses to select consultants for FAU projects. IV. Existing Improvement Plans The city has a design that was completed many years ago. These are available for the consultant to review. -2- V. MB/WBE Requirements The consultant will identify the Caltrans certified DB/WBE being used and the effort made in securing this effort. The minimum Good Faith Effort is as follows: 1. Include qualified MBE firms on solicitation lists. 2. Assuring that MBE firms are solicited whenever they are prospective consultants. 3: When economically feasible, dividing total requirements into smaller tasks so as to permit maximum MBE participation. 4. Where time permits, establishing scheules which will encourage participation by MBE's. 5. Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce, and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization of the Department of Transportation. 6. If the consultant subcontracts work to other firms, the consultant shall take the above affirmative steps. -3- REQUES r FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date October 1 1 � , Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 60� 4 "-I- -10 Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra r Prepared by: Paul E. Cook , Director , Public Worksp. GZS Subject: BROOKHURST STREET AND BRIDGE WIDENI G OJEC Consistent with Council Policy? ['A Yes I l New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: An Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration has been prepared in conjunction with a proposal to widen Brookhurst Street , including the bridge over Talbert Channel , between the channel and Pacific Coast Highway. The purpose of this project is to eliminate the traffic bottleneck where -Brookhurst narrows as it crosses the channel , and to reduce risks to motor vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists . The document, prepared jointly by Public Works and Development Services , has followed California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS ) and the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) procedures . Also, the document has been prepared for , and approved by, FHWA and CALTRANS. The next step in this aspect of the process is to request council approval of the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration in order to proceed with the project . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 5 5 approving the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration (No . 85-47 ) and recommend that this document has resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact ( FONSI ) for the proposed project. ANALYSIS: The project is a proposal to widen 500 feet of Brookhurst Street from the Talbert Flood Control Channel to Pacific Coast Highway, including the bridge that spans the channel . The wider street will allow the addition of a traffic lane in each direction plus bicycle lanes in each direction and sidewalks . Widening that portion of Brookhurst will bring it into conformance with the rest of the roadway between the channel and the 405 Freeway. The project will take place within the City 's existing right-of-way and expand the 500 feet of roadway from a current width of 50 feet (4 lanes ) to 120 feet (6 lanes ) , including bike lanes and sidewalks . This improvement will impact a total of 10 ,251 square PIO 4/84 feet of wetland. Wetland impacts include both plant life adjacent to the existing roadway and additional shadowing of the channel surface from the wider bridge . Further discussion of these impacts can be found in the attached documents: The Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration and the Draft Addendum to that document containing corrections and responses to comments received during the public review period. In its present condition, the narrow strip of Brookhurst creates a bottle-neck for south and northbound traffic . The bottleneck is not only a problem for the average motorist, but it is also a hazard for emergency vehicles , especially those that transport people to Hoag Hospital in Newport Beach . The narrow bridge presents a measurable risk to pedestrians and bicyclists as they cross it going to and from the beach . Although the State beach has added 1 ,300 additional parking spaces , people still choose to park on Brookhurst , north of the channel , and walk to the beach . Also, with the existing five-foot bike lane, pedestrians and bicyclists compete for space in the bike lane as well as on the bridge . In addition to CALTRANS and FHWA approval , the proposed project has received approval , with conditions, by Fish and Game and the Coastal Commission (see document and its Addendum) , and the project has been endorsed by the Friends of the Huntington Beach Wetlands . FUNDING SOURCE: Federal Highway Administration 83 . 17 percent Gas Tax Funds 16.83 percent ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Reject the project, lose the 1 .5 million in funding currently held by the Orange County Transportation Commission and leave the 500 feet of Brookhurst in its current condition . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project , Draft Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration 2. Draft Addendum to the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration containing corrections and responses to comments received during the public review period I JWP: DB:kla RCA - 10/21/85 -2- (3449d ) } to-u-fs &KI 4Fwff7 Csp5,C.4 &)fxkmil 3) ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE BROOKHURST STREET AND BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT NOVEMBER, 1985 I . Corrections to the Document II . Response to Comments III . Comments Received During the Public Review Period 1- 1 INTRODUCTION The draft of the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration for the Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening project was completed in July 1985 . The public review period, as advertised in the Huntington Beach Independent and the Daily Pilot , commenced on August 1 , 1985 and ended on August 30 , 1985 . This addendum includes : I . Corrections to the Document II . Responses to Comments Received During the Public Review Period III . Copies of All Correspondence Received During the Public Review Period Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d) l ( 1 I . CORRECTIONS TO THE DOCUMENT 1 . The removal of the broken concrete in the wetland on the east side of Brookhurst will be added to Question No. 13, page 31 , as a mitigation measure. 2 . Discussion of the impacts to the remainder of the 10, 251 square feet of wetland, not including the shading of the channel or fill of the wetland, will be added to Question No. 13, page 31 . 3 . Page 14 , first paragraph . In a 100-year event (flood) the channel could overflow. 4 . Location Hydraulic Report, Appendix 7 add: That bond issues in 1966 and 1967 failed to gain voter approval for channel improvements . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project (3447d) II . RESPONSE TO COMMENTS A. CALIFORNIA-. COASTAL COMMISSION 1 . The Commission 's chief concern with the project is the potential for fill of wetland area that is habitat to the endangered Belding' s Savanna Sparrow and loss of foraging area for the endangered California Least Tern . Response: Discussion is underway with the Coastal Commission to determine alternate roadway designs which will reduce fill in the wetland. In any event, removal of the broken concrete which now exists east of the roadway will be an additional mitigation measure. Results of the discussion will be available at the October 21st meeting. 2 . The proposal to add street lights that will illuminate currently unilluminated habitat areas raises potential concerns . Response: Six hooded sodium vapor streetlights will be installed, 3 on each side of the roadway . Within a few feet of the lamp post , the maximum light distribution will be .0005 lumens and" will deteriorate rapidly . The light will be moonbright or less . The California Least Tern does not sleep in this area . The effect on the Belding Savanna Sparrow will be negligible . 3 . The EA indicates that 10 , 251 square feet of degraded wetland will be impacted . It appears from discussion of item 13 on page 31 that the impacts are from shading of the channel. (5, 100 square feet ) and fill of a small area of wetland on the west side of Brookhurst (102 square feet ) , but the remaining impact is not identified. Response: The remaining 5 ,049 square feet of wetlands will be a zone of disturbance . Temporary construction impacts include: a . Dust - The coating of the leaves will slightly inhibit photosynthesis until the first rain b . Increase in noise from construction equipment - A temporary increase in loud noise can be expected to scare birds away from the project area . C. Increase in diesel emissions - A temporary increase in emission may place slight stress on vegetation . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d ) d. Vehicular intrusion into the wetland during construction will be prevented by the erection of a temporary fence. Once the project is complete, a zone of disturbance on either side of the roadway can be expected to develop. The following impacts may occur : a . Roadway Runoff - An increase in freshwater runoff immediately adjacent to the roadway may create a brackish. water marsh . A small amount of pollutants may be ingested by indigenous invertebrates . b . Auto Emissions - Emissions from the automobiles may slightly stress vegetation . An increase in ambient air temperature may occur because cars will be idling in three lanes at the stop light at Brookhurst and Pacific Coast Highway instead of one lane. This effect could contribute to drier conditions immediately adjacent to the roadway. C. Noise - Birds may avoid areas next to the roadway. 4. From discussions with staff of the City of Huntington Beach and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, it appears possible to widen the road without filling the wetland . If all fill were eliminated, the remaining _impacts would be the shading of the foraging area for the California Least Tern and illumination . The existing document does not support the conclusion of no significant impact, either individually or cumulatively. However , if the document and the project are modified to prevent any direct fill and'. to limit long term affects of fairly minor shading, a negative declaration may be appropriate, Response: City staff is currently discussing this issue with Coastal Commission staff. The final determination will be available for the Council meeting. B. CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - SANTA ANA REGION 1 . Since pile-driving activities associated with this project will likely cause temporary turbidity and siltation impacts , the project proponent is required to submit a pollution control plan for approval by this office prior to construction . This plan should include measures to mitigate any adverse impacts resulting from construction activities . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d ) y Response: The City intends to submit a pollution control plan prior to construction . Temporary turbidity and siltation impacts to the channel will be mitigated by initiating pile-driving activities in the early fall when the channel primarily contains tidal flow and runoff is minimal . C. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 . The proposed project can be expected to relieve traffic congestion at that point and provide a safer access to the beach for pedestrians . Response: None D. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 . We would like to suggest that another wetlands area within the City of Huntington Beach be enhanced or restored as a mitigation proposal for the 10 ,251 squre feet ( .24 acre) of degraded wetland that will be lost as a result of this project . This was identified as a possible mitigation measure in Appendix 5 , page 2, by the Department of Fish -and Game . We are interested in asking what is the current intention of the City with regard to this suggestion? Response: The letter from Fish and Game the Board refers to was written in 1983 . The response, from Fish and Game, in 1985 is the proposed mitigation: erection of rail barriers and re-introducing marsh vegetation to the disturbed areas . The Coastal Commission concurs with the above mitigation and has requested the removal of the concrete debris on the east side of Brookhurst as an additional mitigation . Both Fish and Game and the Coastal Commission concurred ( in 1985 ) that no additional wetland restoration is necessary as a result of the Brookhurst Street and Road widening. Also, as discussed previously in this section of the Public Works Department will have further meetings with the Coastal Commission to determine if the proposed wetland impacts can be reduced by reducing the amount of fill for the project. 2 . Also, we would like to recommend that the. City either utilize reinforced steel concrete beams or specially treated high grade steel beams in the design of the bridge . The City has utilized "special treated" steel in the recent construction of the end of the pier . The use of "reinforced steel concrete beams conforms to the specifications of the State of California 's .standards and so stated on page 28 would reduce the risk of seismic events in the event of ground rupture due to a major earthquake along the Newport-Inglewood fault . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d) i 1 . Response: Reinforced concrete pilars will be used in the construction of the bridge in accordance with State of California seismic regulations . 3 . It also appears to us that this site is utilized heavily by bicyclists and pedes.trians and does present hazards to such by allowing the current condition of the site to remain . This ,. in our opinion, needs to be more sufficiently explained than it was on page 8 in the document . Response• The proposed project includes both bike lanes and sidewalks to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians . The existing road as it bridges the channel is so narrow that vehicles , bicyclists and pedestrians compete for space on the bridge. Pedestrians often have to run along a narrow strip of the bridge to avoid vehicles . Vehicles often slow down to accommodate bicyclist . E . COUNTY OF ORANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD CONTROL PROGRAMS 1 . On page 1 it is indicated that both the bridge and road widening will be constructed with concrete core slabs similar to the existing roadway. Figure . 3 on page 5 , the proposed roadway typical section at the southerly side to Pacific Coast Highway, indicates the roadway widening will consist of asphalt concrete pavement and aggregate base . Response: The proposed bridge widening is to be constructed with concrete core slabs . The street (roadway ) will be constructed of asphalt concrete pavement and aggregate base . 2. On pages 1 and 21 , it is indicated that the Brookhurst bridge design accommodates future extension required in order to span the Talbert Channel (D02 ) widening. The recently approved project report for the Talbert Valley channels to provide 100-year flood protection , is dated February 1985 . The report indicates an alternative which would outlet the Talbert Channel (D02 ) into the ocean just westerly of Brookhurst Street . This alternative would not require bridge widening. Other channel alternatives provide for an ocean outlet near the Santa Ana River mouth . In this case the channel right-of-way width required is 260 feet . The proposed base width of the channel is 160 feet with vertical walls . Our hydraulic calculations also assumed four 1 .5 foot wide piers . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d) A transition to a trapezoidal section with a base width of 160 feet and 1 . 5: 1 side slopes would also be needed for the ultimate channel section or an interim transition to the existing earth channel section. At this time the EIR for the Talbert valley Channels has not been certified and an alternative channel alignment or cross section has not been determined. In order to cover all , the new Brookhurst Street Bridge should provide adequate channel right-of-way and channel cross section for the outlet adjacent to the Santa Ana River . In a letter dated September 12, 1984 (letter attached) from the County of Orange to the City of Huntington Beach , future Talbert Channel dimensions were indicated so the Brookhurst Bridge widening could accommodate the future channel configuration . Response: The bridge will be constructed to allow the two alternatives of (1 ) a parallel channel to Brookhurst Street on ( 2 ) an extension and widening under the bridge . The piles are 114" or 1 .33 feet wide . The bridge will be widened to 120 ' with room on the end _pile caps for the lengthening if required by the Talbert Channel Project. 3 . It should be clarified on pages 14 and 30 , what is meant by the (DO2 ) channel 's drainage area is 34 feet? Response: The term "drainage area" means the bottom width of the channel under the bridge. 4 . The interim and ultimate conditions for the freeboard from water surface to soffit of bridge should be indicated in the subject report . Response• The interim and ultimate conditions for the freeboard from the water surface to the soffit of the bridge is described in the Hydrology Report . 5 . It appears within the discussion of environmental evaluation and mitigation measures , items no . 6 through 9 were left out . Response: Items no. 6 through 9 are not affected by the project and do not need to be addressed. Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project (3447d) 6. Pages 14 and 29 state that "capacity of the channel varies from a 5-year to a 100-year return frequency. " According to our information no portion or section of D02 has the capacity to carry the 100-year design discharge. The report 's above statement 'is not consistent with the paragraph, stating "and will contain 65 percent of a 25 year flood frequency. " It follows that in a 100-year event the channel could overflow. Response: The County is correct and the paragraph should read: no portion or section of D02 has the capacity to carry the 100-year design discharge . The 100 year event would cause channel overflow. 7 . On page 30 it is stated the proposed widening would not interrupt the floodflow and the existing bridge does not transverse the floodplain . These statements should be clarified , since the Talbert Channel (D02 ) is presently undersigned and will not convey the 100-year design discharge. Response: The proposed bridge does not modify the Talbert Channel (D02 ) . The new bridge will do nothing to change the existing conditions . As stated on page 29 of the document . . . "The storm capacity of the channel varies from a 5-year to a 100-year return frequency, and will contain 65 percent of a 25-year flood frequency at the intersection of Brookhurst and the Talbert Channel . " When the channel is widened, however , the new bridge will accommodate an increased size and capacity of the channel . 8 . The "Location Hydraulic Report" by Les Evens in .Appendix 7 should mention that subsequent bond issue measures in 1966 and in 1967 failed to gain voter approval for channel improvements . Response: In the "Location Hydraulic Report" , Appendix 7 , it will be added that bond issue measures in 1966 .and 1967 failed to gain voter approval for channel improvements . F. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1 . There is a major District No. 11 Trunk Sewer located on the west side of the project . It is suggested that the City work with the District to determine the exact location of this major Coast Trunk Sewer . Response: The City will work with the District to determine the exact location of the sewer line during project design and prior to i project construction . Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d) G. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1 . The proposed project will involve the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters within Corps jurisdiction . A permit is required . Response: The Talbert Channel is within Corps jurisdiction because it receives tidal influance and is therefore considered to be nevigable waters . Pile-driving activities during construction of the bridge-widening will cause turbidity and silting downstream from the site for approximately one week . A request for the permit will be transmitted to the Corps as soon as the project is approved. H. MR. DAVID HALL, TELEPHONE CONVERSATION, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3 In response to Mr . Hall 's letter of August 28 , 1985 , requesting a public hearing, a letter was sent to him in regards to his concerns . Mr . Hall did not respond to the City 's letter and also did not attend an informal public hearing, held at his request , Thursday, September 26, 1985 . CALTRANS directed staff to contact Mr . Hall to determine if his concerns were adequately addressed. Thursday evening, October 3 , Diana Blaisure contacted Mr . Hall . The results of that telephone conversation were as follows : Ms . Blaisure discussed (on the phone ) mitigation measures that would be implemented for the proposed Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening. It was explained to him that the City would ( 1 ) erect barrier rails along both Brookhurst and Magnolia to prevent vehicle intrusion into the Wetlands ; ( 2) Plant marsh vegetation adjacent to the barriers on both streets; and ( 3 ) remove the concrete debris from the east side of Brookhurst between the channel- and Pacific Coast Highway. Mr . Hall was satisfied with the answers to his questions; was not aware that he ws the only one who had requested a public hearing, and apologized for not responding to staff 's letter or the notice of public hearing. He said that no further communication or hearings . needed to be proposed or conducted on his behalf. Mr . Hall 's letter and staff 's response ( letter ) are included in the correspondence following this response section of the addendum. I. JOHN AND LINDA HAWKINS, NEARBY RESIDENTS 1 . The nearby residents strongly support the widening project. Currently the bridge crossing is a treacherous experience. The pedestrian walk is in the car lane. Cars are forced to swerve into the adjoining lane to avoid hitting pedestrians .. Addendum — Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project ( 3447d) Response: None J. NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION - STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 . Please contact the County Coronor ' s office if human remains of Native American origin are encountered during the project, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 7050 . 5 of the Health and Safety Code . The Commission will assist in expediting the preservation and protection of the remains in a respectful manner . Response: The City will follow procedures set forth in the Health and Safety Code. 2 . Please consult with the local Indian community in the project area to mitigate potential impacts to burial sites and other cultural resources of value to their particular tribal customs . Response: The City sent letters to the individuals and groups listed by the Commission to solicit comments on the proposed project. None of those contacted had any comments except Jim Valasquez , Coastal Gabrielino . City staff met with him on May 29 , 1985 . He stated that he knew of no cultural resources in the project area . An Archaeological Records Search was conducted by UCLA in March , 1985 . No sites were found since the area was historically marshland . K. OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 1 . The State Clearinghouse submitted the Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. Please respond to their comments . Response: The Native American Heritage Commission , California Regional Water Quality Control Board' - Santa Ana Region, and the California Coastal Commission commented on the document, and those comments are included in this addendum. Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project (3447d) • I,. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD, U . S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 . Since the Talbert Channel is subject to tidal influence , it is a navigable channel and is therefore subject to U. S. Coast Guard jurisdiction . A bridge permit is required. Response: The City will apply for a bridge permit . M. PHIL AND GEORGIA WILDER - RESIDENTS OF 9432 MOLAKAI DRIVE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1 . Resident is concerned about the poor condition of the Talbert (sic ) Bridge , especially pushing bikes and pedestrians together . Response- The bridge will be widened to accommodate a sidewalk and a bike path in both directions . 2. Brookhurst should be at least 6 to 8 lanes with an emergency lane down the middle . Response: Brookhurst Street will be widened to 6 lanes, and a 12 inch painted median. The bike paths will be used as emergency lanes . 3 . The number of accidents on Pacific Coast Highway are on the increase . The traffic on the weekend is ten-fold wht it was four years ago. Response: Traffic is increasing in the area, especially with the addition of 1 ,300 beach parking spaces and a new parking entrance at Brookhurst and Pacific Coast Highway. The widening of Brookhurst, as well as the proposed widening of Pacific toast Highway will accommodate the increase in traffic and reduce traffic hazards , 4 . Fire hydrants should be installed at Brookhurst and PCH. Response: The installation of fire hydrants are not required because adequate coverage is already provided for nearby residents . Fire apparatus carries sufficient water to suppress vehicular fires . Wetland vegetation is unlikely to burn because of the high moisture content. Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project (3447d) 5. Appropriate curbs and barriers with street lights and a landscape barrier and fence bordering the wetland should be installed. The wetland is one of the City's eyesores . . Response• Additional street lights will be installed. A barrier rail will be erected to prevent vehicular intrusion into the wetland. Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge widening Project (3447d ) f r V STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN. Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION *;ti. SOUTH COAST AREA . 245 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 380 a ' LONG BEACH, CA 90802 (213) 590-5071 September 6, 1985 Charles K. Fellows Resources Agency 1416 Ninth Street, Roan 215-4 Sacramento, California 95814 Subject: Environmental Asses sment/Negati-vP Dec:larati.or for widen;ng of iBrc­_kh,_st Street and Bridge (SCH # 85081414) Dear Mr. Fellows: The Environmental Assessment/ Negative Declaration for the widening of Brookhurst Street and Bridge does not include enough information to conclude that the project will not, individually or. cumulatively, threaten or reduce the numbers of rare or endangered species. Further, the description of the project is not clear enough to determine the actual effects with any precision, making review of this project for compliance with the Coastal Act difficult or impossible.The Commission's chief concern with the project is the potential for fill of wet- land that is habitat to the endangered Belding's Savanna Sparrow and loss of fora ging area for the endangered California Least Tern. The proposal to add streetlights that will illuminate currently unilluminated habitat areas also raises potential concerns. To validly conclude that there will not be substantial adverse impacts, the EA must address and resolve the potential for impact. 'Ihe EA does not do so, and indeed, is ambiguous about the potential for impact in a number of areas. For example, the EA indicates (page 1) that the project will "impact a total of 10,251 square feet of degraded wetland." The nature of the impacts, the significance of the impacts, and mitigation measures or alternatives are not analyzed. It appears from discussion of item 13 on page 31 that the impacts are from shading of the channel (5100 square feet) and fill of a small area of wetland on the west side of Brookhurst (102 square feet) , but the remaining impact is not identified. Indeed, the response on item 22, page 34 uses different numbers, and the tern "impact" without elaboration. From discussions with staff of the City of Huntington Beach and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, it appears possible to limit the potential for impact to shading of Talbert Channel. Presently, 79 feet of roadbed are striped in the area adjacent to wetlands (Figure 3) , and existing wetlands are 31 feet from the roadbed to the north and 34 feet from the roadbed to the south. Thus, it should be possible to widen the road to 120 feet, the width used throuth the bridge, without filling any wetland. Greater widths may be possible, depending on roadbed elevation, but mig t complicate construction. , III . COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING THE PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD Addendum - Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project (3447d) STATE Cc CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENC GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION C-4 SOUTH COAST AREA 243 WEST &ROADWAY, SUITE 380 LONG BEACH, CA 9W02 (213) 590.5071 Page 2 If all fill were eliminated, the remaining impacts would be the shading of foraging area for the Least Tern and illun=i tion. Staff from the Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service believe that construction of an effective roadway barrier along Brookhurst would eliminate encroachment by vehicles using the wetland fringe for parking. They believe that halting encroachment would more than offset the loss of foraging area and illumination, especially as the channel would remain productive for fisheries, and the food source for the Least Tern would not be affected. We are prepared to concur in their conclusion as long as the potential for fill is eliminated so that it is possible to construct the project without any direct or indirect fill of wetland. We do believe that any fill of wetland has poten- tially serious c=uilative effects, and should be avoided. In conclusion, we believe that the existing document does not support the conclusion of no significant impact, either individually or cumulatively. However, if the document and the project are modified to prevent any direct fill and to limit long term effects to fairly minor shading, we do believe that a negative declaration would be appropriate. In any evert, the EA should be updated or amended to make the effects clear. Sincerely, Rober�t�F.. Joseph Assistant District Director RFJ/JM:ck State of California Memorandum To Dr. Gordon Snow Date: August 28, 1985 Assistant Secretary for Resources :J Nancy A. Olson Environmental Technician From California Regional Water Quality Control Board—Santa Ana Region 6809 INDIANA AVENUE. SUITE 200, RIVERSIDE. CA 92506 (ATSS) 532-4130 Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION/ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, BROOKHURST STREET AND BRIDGE WIDENING PROJECT EA/ND #85-47, SCH 7#85081414 We have reviewed the Negative Declaration/Environmental Assessment (Neg. Dec./E.A. ) for this project and wish to offer the following comments. Since pile-driving activities associated with this project will likely cause temporary turbidity and siltation impacts, the project proponent is required to submit a pollution control plan for approval by this office prior to construc- tion. This plan should include measures to mitigate any adverse impacts resulting from construction activities. Any questions regarding this plan should be .addressed to Mr. Gary Stewart of this office. Enclosure: State Clearinghouse Form NAO:kyb Environmental Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINCTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 • Huntington Beach, California 92648 October 10 , 1985 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 92648 SUBJECT: Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project We would like to suggest that another wetlands area within the City of Huntington Beach be enhanced or restored as a mitigation proposal for the 10, 251 square feet ( . 24 acres ) of degraded wetland that will be lost as a result of this project . This was identified as a possible mitigation measure in Appendix 5 , page 2, by the Department of Fish and Game . We are interested in asking what is the current intention of the City with regard to this suggestion? Also, we would like to recommend that the City either utilize reinforced steel concrete beams or specials treated high grade steel beams in the design of the bridge . The City has utilized "special treated" steel in the recent construction of the end of the pier . The use of "reinforced steel " concrete beams conforms to the specifications of the State of California 's standards and so stated on page 28 would reduce the risk of seismic events in the event of ground rupture due to a major earthquake along the Newport-Inglewood fault . It also appears to us that this site is utilized heavily by bicyclists and pedestrians and does present hazards to such by allowing the current condition of the site to remain . This , in our opinion, needs to be more sufficiently explained than it was on page 8 in the document . In light of this public safety issue , we recommend and endorse the project overall and welcome the opportunity for improvement on a much needed project . Thank you for the opportunity of responding to the environmental Assessment/Negatine Declaration. Sincerely, nthia Doe Chairman , Environmental Review Committee of the Huntington Beach Environmental Board cc: Lee Wieder Kay Seraph ine CD: DB: lp ( 3461d ) MURRAYSTORM C DIRECTOR DIRECTOR. EMA O RT G. FISHER U NTY O F ROBEOF PLANNING Z 1 LOCATION: 12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA P.O. BOX 4048 5 3 RAN CAPE SANTA ANA.CA 92702-4048 MAILING ADDRESS. P.O. BOX 4048 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY SANTA ANA, CA 92702-4048 PLANNING TELEPHONE: (714)834-4643 yr FILE NCL 4146 5 1985 HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Charles W. Thompson City Manager SEP Q 9 1985 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration for Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project Dear Mr.. Thompson: The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency has reviewed the Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration. Attached for your consideration are comments and a copy of previous correspondence from this Agency' s Flood Control Programs Division. In summary, it is requested that the Brookhurst Bridge design accomodate the alternative ocean outlets for the Talbert Valley Channels set forth in the referenced project report. As you know, we have a Memorandum of Understanding with CalTrans regarding their PCH Widening Project which provides for a similar accommodation. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Ruane, at 834-5550. Very truly yo , M: Stormb irector Attachment Cc: Diana Blaisure, Department of Development services/ SA(031) f� County of Orange File: DO1/D02/D05.21 • '9<!i'OPd AUG 2 1 1905 TO: F. W. Olson, Manager, EMA/ESP FROM: J. M. Natsuhara, Manager, EMA/Flood Control Programs Ph: x8150 SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration Brookhurst Street & Bridge Widening Project This is in response to your memo dated August 8, 1985 (NCL No. 4146) . Flood Control Program staff has reviewed the subject Environmental assessment/ Negative Declaration for possible impacts on design alternatives for the Talbert Valley Channel Flood Control Improvement Project. Comments are as follows: 1. On page one it is indicated that both the bridge and road widening will be constructed with concrete core slabs similar to the existing roadway. Figure 3 on page 5, the proposed roadway typical section at the southerly side to Pacific Coast Highway, indicates the roadway widening will consist of asphalt concrete .pavement and aggregate base. 2. On pages one and 21, it is indicated that the Brookhurst bridge design accommodates future extension required in order to span the Talbert Channel 002) widening. The recently approved project report for the Talbert Valley channels to provide 100-year flood protection, is dated February 1985. The report indicates an alternative which would outlet the Talbert Channel (D02) into the ocean just westerly of Brookhurst Street. This alternative would not require bridge widening. Other channel alternatives provide for an ocean outlet near the Santa Ana River mouth. In this case the channel right-of-way width required is 260 feet. The proposed base width of the channel is 160 feet with vertical walls. Our hydraulic calculations also assumed four 1.5 foot wide piers. A transition to a trapezoidal section with a base width of 160 feet and 1.5: 1 side slopes would also be needed for the ultimate channel section or an interim transition to the existing earth channel section. At this time the EIR for the Talbert Valley Channels has not been certi- fied and an alternative channel alignment or cross section has not been determined. In order to cover all, the new Brookhurst Street Bridge should provide adequate channel right-of-way and channel cross section for the outlet adjacent to the Santa Ana River. In a letter dated September 12, 1984 (letter attached) from the County of Orange to the City of Huntington Beach, future Talbert Channel dimensions were indicated so the Brookhurst Bridge widening could accommodate the future channel configuration. 3. It should be clarified on pages 14 and 30, what is meant by the (D02) channel' s drainage area is 34 feet? F. W. Olson, Manager Page 2 4. The interim and ultimate conditions for the freeboard from water surface to soffit of bridge should be indicated in the subject report. 5. It appears within the discussion of environmental evaluation and mitiga- tion measures, items no. 6 through 9 were left out. 6. Pages 14 and 29 state that "capacity of the channel varies from a 5-year to a 100-year return frequency." According to our information no portion or section of D02 has the capacity to carry the 100-year design discharge. The report' s above statement is not consistent with the paragraph, stating "and will contain 65 percent of a 25 year flood frequency." It follows that in a 100-year event the channel could overflow. 7.. On page 30 it is stated the proposed widening would not interrupt the floodflow and the existing bridge does not transverse the floodplain. These statements should be clarified, since the Talbert Channel (D02) is presently undersized and will not convey the 100-year design discharge. 8. The. "Location Hydraulic Report" by Les Evans in Appendix 7 should mention that subsequent bond issue measures in .1966 and in 1967 failed to gain voter approval for channel improvements. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. If any ques- tions arise please contact Dick Runge at 834-5097. f L4 J. M. 'Natsuhara RS:mm(13/026) Attachment 1 4 ■ , C MURRAY STOP U �9�'Y �f DIRECTOR, ES C.R.NELS( r 1 1 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORT LOCATIO S 3 IF%"j06N 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WE: SANTA ANA,CALIFORN MAILING ADORES ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY P.O. sox 40 PUBLIC WORKS SANTA ANA,CA 92702.40 September 12, 1984 TELEPHON 1714)034.23 FILE DO1/DO2/DO5.21 Ztr. Bill Waddell, P.E. City of Huntington Beach Traffic Engineering Division P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Brookhurst Bridge Widening Project Dear Bill: Thank yosu for the opportunity to review the draft report on the Brookhurst Bridge Widening Project. The Project Report for the Talbert Valley Channel System being prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) is nearing completion. The Talbert Channel (D02) ocean outlet cannot be improved in its present location because of widening of the Santa Ana River proposed by the Corps of Engineers. Several alternative outlet locations were investi- gated. The first alternative is to move the existing D02 ocean outlet westerly to provide for widening of the Santa Ana River ocean outlet as recommended in the Corps of Engineers proposed development plan for the Santa Ana River Project.- The second alternative is to provide a new ocean outlet for D02 westerly of Brookhurst Street. The preliminary report recommends the Brookhurst Street ocean outlet based upon estimated costs and impacts on the nesting area near the river mouth. Final determination is of course subject to the findings of the EIR. The EIR is being prepared by RBF and scheduled for completion in December, 1984. If the Santa Ana River ocean outlet is selected, the Brookhurst Bridge will have to be reconstructed (Lengthening along street centerline) to allow for the widening of the channel. The new channel crossing at Brookhurst Street will probably be a rectangular channel with a base width of 160 feet or an equivalent trapezoidal cross section with 1:1 side slopes. The widening will take place on the southwesterly side of the existing channel and will require an ultimate right of way. of 260 feet from the DOI confluence to the Pacific Coast Highway. The widened channel will provide increased flow capacity for D02 and is part of the County's effort to attain a 100-year level of protection for the channel system in Talbert Valley. Mr. Bill Waddell, P.E. Page 2 If you or your staff have any questions or need additional information, please call Dick Runge.at 834-5097 or Domingo Cruz at 834-5985. Very truly yours, J. M. Natsuhara, Chief EMA/Public Works-Design C 'DLC:cs cc: Mr. Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Mr. Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 o ''• `"' 1+ 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 A�Mce coop (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 September 10 , 1985 City of Huntington Beacom P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention Diana Teranblaisure Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 13ROORHURST STREET AND BRIDGE WIDENING The Districts have reviewed the environmental assessment for the Brookhurst Street and Talbert Channel Bridge widening. Districts have no comment on the project except to point out that there is a major District No. 11 Trunk Sewer located on the west side of the project. It is, therefore, suggested that prior to preparation of plans and specifications, the City work with the Districts to determine the exact location of this major Coast Trunk Sewer. I£ you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Hilary J. Baker Senior Administrative Assistant HJB:kk BEACH Str i98S Hunthie;�„ 92648 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ` LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS s P.O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 RE-LY TO ATTENTION OF: August 20 , 1985 Regulatory Branch 141.;;•d T I LEACH City of Huntington Beach !i!It; ? 1 198S Department of Development Services ATTENTION : Ms . Diana Teran Plaisure 190 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 HuntlnE_irl CA 92648 Gentlemen: Reference is made to your letter of July 29 , 1985 requesting our response to your Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration. A Corps of Engineers permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into "waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 404. of the Clean Water Act. The definition of "waters. of the United States" is quite lengthy , but effectively includes almost all water bodies , waterways , and wetlands in the United States . The term "discharge of dredged or fill material" includes , without limitations , groins , breakwaters, road fills , beach nourishment , riprap, jetties , grading ( in some cases) , land fills , and disposal of material excavated from waters of the United States . Your proposed project appears to involve the discharge of dredged and/or fill material within Corps jurisdiction. Enclosed is a permit application and booklet explaining our Regulatory program, If you have any questions , please contact Ms . Cheryl Hill of odr Regulatory Branch at (213) 894-5606 . In addition, please note that copies of this letter have been sent to the agencies bn . the enclosed list. Sincerely, J.P. Fast Chief , Construction Operations Division,. Enclosures-''' Copies are being forrarded to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services - 24000 Avila Road Laguna Niguel, California 92677 U.S . Environmental Protection Agency Regional Administrator , Region IX, E4 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, California . 94105 California Department of .Fish and Game Region 5 - 245 West Broadway, Suite 350 Long Beach, California 90802 . i i David J. Hall 17300 Santa Clara St. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Ms . Diana Teran Blaisure HUNTINGTON BEACH Assistant Planner - Department of Development Services DEVELOPMENT SERVICES City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main street AUG ? 9 1985 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 { jox19O Dear Ms . Blaisure : HuntingtLm Jeach, CA 92648 After reading the planning document for the proposed widening of Brookhurst Street at Pacific Coast Highway, I would like to make a few comments regarding the plan. One of the reasons that the Coastal Act was passed by the public nearly a decade ago was to preserve the remaining open space along the coast. As a result, areas like the Huntingtcn Beach Wetlands are protected and any project encroaching on the land must meet very stringent regulations in order to be allowed. Regarding this particular project I have a couple of questions . First, Does this project meet Coastal Act regulations to retain or enhance the functual capacity of the wetland in question? Secondly, why doesn' t the pro- posed project ' s analysis take into account the combined impact of the widening of Brookhurst. Street and Pacific Coast Highway? Both projects will have a major impact upon the environment of the wet- lands and should be ccnsidered together. The Department of Fish and Game reports in the planning document that some 102 square feet of wetlands will be lost to the project. In addition, there will be alteration and pcss.ible loss of much more land. In addition, there will be a loss of uplands which buffer the adjacent wetlands . A number of species live in the wetalnds and the project will affect them. This will include the Belding Savannah Sparrow and the Least Tern which fish in the Talbert Channel. Although the project document foresees a minimal impact upon the environment, I question if the com- bined impact. cf the Brc.okhurst Street and Pacific Coast Highway alter ation will be more than minor, and may actually threaten the very sur- vival of the coastal environment.This has yet to be addressed. In what way will the project enhance or at least retain the productivity of the wetlands? To install fencing or sia:il.ar. barriers along the pedes- trian trail and to restore wetalnds lost in the right of way outside of the project but. impacted during construction are mitigation measures that are minimally acceptable . What is needed to enhance the impacted wetlands are the two additional mitigati.cr_ measures offered by the Department of Fish and Game which are to open a culvert intc the flood control channel and restore tidal flushing into the wetlands , and to restore the fresh,,;a.ter wetland west of Beach. Boulevard. I request a public hearing to address these concerns and :uppert for the Department of Fish and Game ' s recommendations regarding the project . Respe,c ully CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. B-OX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOIL.,TG DIVISION(714)536-5241 PLANNING D }SION(714)536 5271 - August 30 , 1-985 Mr . David Hall 17300 Santa Clara Street Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject : Brookhurst Street and Bridge -Widening Project Dear Mr . Hall : Thank you for; your comments on the Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project,. .You expressed many of the concerns that citizens have about development in a sensitive wetland environment. It is our view that although the proposed project will impact the adjacent,wetland, overriding safety issues must be considered. With the addition of 1 , 20.0 spaces and entrance to the beach parking lot at Pacific Coast Highway and Brookhurst Street, traffic is expected to increase substantially. The bottleneck at the bridge not only backs up traffic , but also inhibits access to the beach , a concern of the Coastal Commission. Further , the lack of sidewalks and bikepaths forces pedestrians and cyclists to use the street to cros.� the bridge. This is potentially very dangerous . The proposed project would increase the number of lanes to conform with the rest of Brookhurst Street and provide a separate bike path and sidewalk to protect beach.goers from possible harm. Unfortunately, the proposed project will result in . a loss of 102 square feet of wetlands . The City has already discussed this issue with the Department- of Fish and Game and reached an agreement with them to mitigate the. loss by installing a protective barrier rail on Magnolia and Brookhurst to prevent vehicular intrusion into the wetlands . The Department of Fish and Game agreed that , due to the relative small size of this project, full scale restoration of wetlands would not *6e necessary. However , such a restoration will be required to mitigate the widening of Pacific Coast Highway. These measures will greatly enhance the functioning of the wetlands. Although the -deeding area in the Talbert Channel will be -slightly reduced, the primary feeding ground for the California Least Tern is at the mouth of the Santa Ana River . The Belding Savanna. Sparrow does not prir�Ari'ly feed in the channel so the impact will:,-be- negligible. � r r 1G Mr . David Hall August 30, 1985 Page Two We would appre.Ciate the opportunity to discuss your concerns with you before we. schedule the public hearing. Please call me at your earliest convenience. . I can be reached at ( 714 ) 536-5271 . Thank you again for. your comments. Sincerely, 'J� Diana Teran Blaisure* Assistant Planner DTB: kla (.3178d ) S r r i S FL Full Service Travel Arrangements • Individuals _ • Groups • Clubs • Business HUNTINGTr-iN BEACH August 28, 1985 DEVE!OP M E-i•t Y SZ R`,ICES Diana Teran Blaisure, Assistant Planner S E D Q 3 1985 City of Huntington Beach Department of Development Services �,� Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Huntington rse:cn, 1;t1 9264�s Subject: Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Dear Ms. Blaisure, We would like to thank you for sending us a copy of the environmental impact study on the widening of Brookhurst Street at the Banning Flood Control Bridge.. We strongly support this widening project along with most of our neighbors. We have lived near the Banning Bridge for over eight years and have either walked, jogged or bicycled over "Deadman's" bridge several hundred times. Each crossing has been a treacherous experience. The narrow pedestrian walk is actually right in the car lane. As you walk over the bridge, you can see the stream of cars coming directly at you. The cars are forced to swerve into the adjoining lane in order to prevent hitting pedestrians. I have seen many cars drive right over the pedestrian lane. It is inevitable that eventually a terrible disaster will occur at this location if something is not done to correct this situation. If we can be of any assistance in this matter, please let us know. Sincerely, John R. Hawkins Linda C. Hawkins Post Office Box 5878 • Huntington Beach, California 92615 • (714) 968-0991 21681 Seaside Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92646 STnTE OF :ALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 915 Capitnl Moll, Room 288 Sacramento, California 95814 (914) 322-7791 :. Lr� BENCH August 22, 1985 _ _ ��! SE �VIC`S Diana Teran Balisure City of Huntington Beach ,, ; 2 . io�y 2000 Main Street ! _. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i- ntin,-un e"C7, CA 92648 RE: Brookhurst Street and Bridge Widening Project EA/ND #85-47 SCH# 85081414 The Native American Heritage Commission appreciates the opportunity to express its concerns and comments in the environmental review process. As you may know, the Commission is mandated to preserve and protect places of special religious or cultural significance to California Indians (Native Americans) pursuant to Section 5a97 et seq of the Public Resources Code. The Commission has the further responsibility of assisting Native Americans in cemetery and burial protection pursuant to Section 5097.94 (k) of the Public Resources Code. We request that the County Coronor's office be contacted if human remains of Native -American origin are encountered during the project, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code. Should this occur, the Commission will assist in expediting the preservation and protection of the remains in a respectful manner. We request that you consult with the local Indian community in this project area in order to mitigate potential impacts to burial sites and other cultural resources of value to th.eir .particular tribal customs.. I have enclosed an attachment listing those individuals and/or groups which may have concerns regarding the project area. If ou�rhave any questions please contact me for further assistance. Si cerely yours, W'2.7 A nette Ospi Val Special Assistant AO:jg Attachment John Sespe Box 2629 Goleta, CA 93118 NATIVE AMERICAN CONTACTS PAGE' 1 Name, Address Tribal County Organization Telephone No. Affiliation Affiliation Ray Belardes Juaneno Orange 16760 Paradise Mt. Road Valley Center, CA 92082 (619) 749-2312 Ms. Beatrice Alva Gabrielino Los Angeles/Orange 122 East Pearl San Gabriel , CA 92776 Mr. Art Morales Gabrielino Orange/Los Angeles 4257 Meadow Street LaVerne, CA 91750 (714) 593-8227 Mr. Fred Morales Gabrielino Orange/Los Angeles j1 2- East Main Street San Gabriel , CA 91776 (818) 285-4401 Jim Velasques Gabrielino Orange 1226 West Third St. (Coastal ) Santa Ana, CA 92703 (714) 547 '4237 •' T L NATIVE AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS PAGE 1 Organization, Address Tribal County Telephone Number Affiliation Capistrano Indian Council Orange P.O. Box 304 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92676 ( 714) 493-1892 Contact: Teeter Marie Romero Juaneno Band of Mission Juaneno Orange Indians P.O. Box 1382 San Juan Capistrano, CA .92674 Contact: 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR � GEORGE DEUKMVIAN, Governor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 14DO TENTH STREET _ s SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 Diana Teran Balisure September 13, 1985 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Brookhurst Street & Bridge Widening Project EA/MD #85-47 Sch# 85081414 Dear Ms. Balisure: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named proposed Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and the comments of the individual agency(ies) is(are) enclosed. Also, on the enclosed Notice of Completion, the Clearinghouse has checked which agencies have comanented. Please review the Notice of Completion to ensure that your comment package is complete. If the package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Your eight-digit State Clearinghouse number should be used so that we may respond promptly. Please note that recent legislation requires that a responsible agency or other public agency shall only make substantive comments on a project which are within the area of the agency's expertise or which relate to activities which that agency must carry out or approve. (AB 2583, Ch. 1514, Stats. 1984. ) These comments are forwarded for your use in adopting your Negative Declaration. If you need more information or clarification, we suggest you contact the commenting agency at your earliest convenience. Please contact Glenn Stober at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, vY John B. Ohanian HUNTINGTON BEACH Chief Deputy Director Office of Planning and Research DEVELOPMENT SERVICES cc: Resources Agency SEP 16 1985 Enclosures P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . .• _ .+' MAI to:ants O-SMOMM. 1400 24ets Bt. i 331.ate,n YOPl.--W�/ sw LII7LL aelo. I==ar masn0l me w�7fl.Ma=W a®QS!!1.L� �? � s01.8 5 0 81 4141 - •+•"<"nc-. //. PM3-t nt1. and Hridge Widening Project EA / ND $ 85-47 = = 2. L_da�City of Huntington Beach 3. cmuct;, :Diana Teran Balisure stmot mdn-:2000 Main Street 3D.ciry-Runtin ton Beach _ x•coven: Orange Se _�92648 U.P� 714-536-5271 lams Lanv 1 4. o wcs: Orange 4a.ap/cmw=ty: Huntington Beach 40•aa- ,.Pu.sl Ms.114-160- ? 4e.s.enpejSannina TraOft)T 65 eaea.R10W SBBSM 1.t. atl.sts: Bushard & Pacific Coast Hwyab. For ft"-'n:�, ~leer a. ntme 2 sal-: a asSat* B. ALr_ wLi- a.ut.,Santa Ana River Bey• 1 pptta wsa _Y.s Talbert Channel 00001wr TM S. lQ9L aLT101 4M 9. 'lIIflLl�!OR L7DA Jl.�Ganl PLU Opmte Ol. Psstd-eLal: Opiu ae.. a= _ - 01._111D 06._F= M._I1w C1sec 01._011lm: 90. Pt. 02.-WIT Dm 07._IQC 03. Gs-tal PUB.sewer Ief.s Oploys.. 03. }�mg Doc 01. 110p 04. Plas 03,_3LaWtnVOo•stet.l: !0. Pt. _ • t 04..Ontt trS M. am-anm acres aMPlpy..a -; Suppl�pt/ ae.�apsetfle 7lY •Os.--•Lesucrtal: 3a. h. aue..4wti�'i, x :. tPno�Q!n0.: 07._a>•wt `��-I C i i 1 C fly• Fsplgsaa A y�po[s�. Imo,c.r r.et utt..: rx 4 _ --' MA 00. 9ssae. IUG 1 gpfy�.�tt.e�ertaum: Type Rnari im rnv ment 00. aor 11. Zia Ia. Lass Dl.irim 07.-Mum: lu-nl _ - 10._F=r 12.]L U T fct 4 C��r:Y'1 r: 77P. htt. .. OLBQ 11._Dw Pavlt 09._psu TmeCast: 77pe U._JOtst Dptssset 12._9ssu 9pl PLO& 10.__Cc:B.lat- - la._f1s1 Oonaut 13.�OO=l k Prwr U._Otsar: - 1S.-fir 14 _L =pitclli movement 10. MOL O®: /. 4+-- C 6 i ny i eved 11. lam im CUBW 12. Few=Ms=Dla IN OOtS9aR is.-Septic 9"t-. 22.X_tatsr"Il ty 4 01._WtsOcte/Plwl O9. X ►lpod[ps/Dtuaw /a._S.wr Qpsecty 24._ft a 3=1- 02._Acmftltanl Lam OB.,�GaO1ePe/S.ls-e r._.,..; 23. X l*U.W/Rtpan 03. S W Otailn S0._JeO./Omatnt B..laees Ia.-�LSetl tms 26.X-9t1d111. .. _ 04._X_Am0a 1grLm,/alptoPleal - 11._ItL-/.1. 19.-3.11a seen 2-.X_6n-m le M-9 m.gCm.ta1 Zms 12.-L-Bn- 20.�7'ane/9atumus ^.a._Lmnmatim.:amu� Oa. _Fo U.-Pmlu S.M+ 21.X.7ntfie/MrCUIStim 20._pm L&tlw C:aets 07.-fin 0asan 14._Sah-Ls 22.-ILcaAutum 30.Z_O'O'^^�SSructlon 13. L001L0 i PPe&) rouses,3 1.9 mill inn am"3 70m1 Sl 9 i 1 1 inn 14• Pa LAW M YO 2®0'Existing roadway 15. PMW=OCIMIDHOI: Widen roadway from four to six lanes and add pedistri.an sidewalks and bicycle paths. The project includes 500 linear feet of roadway within the _ City's right of way, widening the existing road from 50 feet to 136 feet. SM=RLV=fl BEM: REV=W A7 SM: Q//i/ � SIRS Cap . ..:� { t - ., US Department Commander Union Bank Bldg. of Transportation Eleventh Coast Guard District 400 Oceangate Long Beach, CA 90822 Lk*ed Stales Staff Symbol: (oan) COW rsUCUd (213) 590-2222 16590/PF Ser: oan 397-85 15 August 1985 Ms. Diana Blaisure Assistant Planner City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Blaisure: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Environmental Assessment/Negative Declaration (EA/ND) assessing the impacts of the proposed improvements to Brookhurst Street and the bridge spanning Talbert Channel. The Coast Guard will use the EA/ND as an information document for processing the bridge permit application. Sincerely, r . HUNTIN(-:70N BEACH W.' A. M c b a lll, �r, �r Lieutenant C nmander, U.S. Coast Guard �` -L`r� = S"`V I` -S Chief, Aids to Navigation Branch By direction oi*44 the District Commander HuntingiDn e;;ucn, CA 92648 CL - au Qc ce-5--s- 4o k\� Lo (L 4e ��e- 2)ec,� �-v Q'u o u,.)c) Q-1,Ll -e J a6�u+ l `tom E c^ (x� -1 p.4cL� 't�eiL� -� L; Ce (L 6- W4 ez rv\- Fa�,b i i e v kL 4.,j fL;6 e 4L lea s -f r�-o1 to �E►r�•ca.... Cis lc- �`e � -� A c-C-1 Lq �p�t� �z �.�� C.<f R.b S � �cCL 2 t•e.2S l w C-� C Nam•� rs �S-o'fZ�S j I 6 h, w¢.e k e -- C�s - L� s o rZ e 00 �,.� ®�..►'s -4-5 s it b e w ��� Of s � J5� C- 4r IV(' C �-A N Nit co- otvA- t 4-9..�r dcec f t Cam,E. 1 6A (Z. ti w S � �' -�'� It ��� • U.� ` 1 � b-e. yo l.� E } cL �.. 3 REQUES i FOR CITY COUNCIL- :A ION Data October 22, 1984 GiL Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY GoUN RRovED y: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Submitted b BY 1 J Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Street Improvement Damage Caused by Trees n P i ht-of-Way Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Q / STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Street trees in public right-of-way are damaging the street improvements. RECOMMENDATION: .Adopt street tree removal/replacement policy. ANALYSIS: There are approximately 36 , 000 street trees. in the City and many are causing or will cause extensive and costly damage to public improvements. Many of the trees can be maintained in place through maintenance practices such as root pruning, tree trimming and concrete repairs. However, there are some specie/variety of trees that do not lend them- selves to cost effective maintenance and should. be removed. Replacement planting after tree removal can be accomplished in public property with very selective and limited specie/variety choice. Also, tree replacement could be located in private property when resident is in agreement and with certain conditions as stipulated in policy. Planting in private property will be similar to City tree planting requirements for all developmentssince 1972. There are substantial cost effective advantages to this procedure such as elimination of all maintenance costs by City, less right-of-way damage and less vehicle/ street sweeper obstruction problems. ALTERNATIVES: Do not adopt policy and continue existing practices which are less cost effective and less acceptable to residents. FUNDING SOURCE: Adoption of policy is no cost. However, future cost to implement policy will have to be budgeted for when projects are identified and funding is available. ATTACHMENT: Policy CWT:PEC:DS: jy i I PIO 4/81 STREET TREE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT POLICY 1 . PURPOSE : This policy provides the City a method/procedure for solving the on-going problem of street tree damage to public right- of-way improvements . 2 . APPLICATION : Thi.s policy applies to resident request for tree removal as well as City staff designated removal projects . 3 . DEFINITION OF REQUIRED TREE REMOVAL : 3 . 1 Tree removal is required when one or a combination of the following occur : a . Tree is dead . b . Tree is diseased beyond cure . C . Tree is causing damage to right-of-way improvements and repairs cannot be accomplished without tree removal . d . Tree is or will cause damage to right-of-way improvements and maintenance procedures such as root pruning will not prohibit future damage for a substantial period of years that justifies maintenance costs . e . Tree is damaged beyond reasonable repair costs . f . - Tree is found to be public hazard and removal is neces- sary for health , safety and welfare of community . 4 . RESIDENT REQUESTED TREE REMOVAL : 4 . 1 Resident request tree removal will be considered for approval when one or a combination of the following occur : a . When any one or a combination of the categories listed under 3 . 1 of this policy defining required tree removal occur . b . When item a . above under 4 . 1 occurs and a minimum of 75% of the residents living on a specific street have petitioned the City for removal . C . When resident has proven to City ' s satisfaction that the right-of-way tree has caused damage to a private sewer line which cannot be repaired without tree removal . STREET TREE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT POLICY d . When a , b or c above under 4 . 1 occurs and the City has budgeted funds available to accomplish all work neces- sary including but not limited to tree removal , right- of-way repairs and tree - replacement . 5 . POLICY : Public right-of-way tree removal may occur. within the cate- gories , scope and intent of categories 1 through 4 including all sub-categories . . Once removal and all right-of-way re- pairs are completed , tree replacement considerations will include the following : a . Available budgeted funds . b . Whether or not the resident desires a replacement tree . If the resident does not want a tree replacement , no tree will be planted . C . Tree replacement specie/variety shall be determined by the City . d . Tree replacement location may occur , with property owners approval , in private property no closer than six feet from back of property line and no further than ten feet from property line to maintain a street tree effect . e . When tree replacement is to occur in private property City will provide a list of trees to resident for choice of specie . After selection of tree specie the City will purchase and deliver to resident , the replacement tree at no cost to resident if the resident so requests . Once decision has been made to have private property tree planting in lieu of public right-of-way planting no tree will be planted in public right-of-way without City approval . However , the resident will be required to p-lant tree within ten days and maintain tree in perpetuity as a private property matter from date of delivery . When tree replacement is to occur in public right-of-way City will be responsible for all related costs and 'shall decide what specie/variety of tree is to be planted . (2) REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION IQ3 Date ��` 4�t� March 5, :�k .._ Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council / Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrg b •� Prepared by: Melvin M. Bowman, Acting Director, y Rznity S � Subject: STREET MEDIAN SCULPTURE PROJECT bN ,3��ti- 8Y C'oN r Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE The placement of works of sculpture on street median strips at major intersections would add to the attractiveness of the city. RECOMMENDATION Approve the concept of placing median sculptures near major inter- sections in the city as approved and recommended by the Allied Arts Board. ANALYSIS Studies have indicated that areas which have an attractive appearance not only are subject to less vandalism, but also have a tendency to retain their property values as well . In addition, works of art throughout the city would add to community identity and the cultural climate of the city. At its January 9, 1984 meeting, the Allied Arts Board moved to accept the Median Sculpture Project , to place pieces of sculpture with an approximate price to the artist of $2 ,000 in a centrally located environment as a project to be undertaken by the Board. The motion was unanimously approved by the Allied Arts Board. Because the program is being started so late in the budget year, only two pieces of sculpture are requested from the current budget . Artists will be invited to submit models of works of art to the Allied Arts Board and the initial pieces will be selected to be placed on median strips on Main Street between Yorktown and Loma. (See map attached) . The artists are to be paid $2 ,000 each for their work. If the project proves successful , funds will be budgeted and addi- tional pieces placed on other locations throughout the city. Requests for artists to submit examples of their work will. be sent to school art departments , galleries and artists . A panel of judges .will be selected by the Board to review and select the pieces . The judges will evaluate the art based on appropriateness of subject, sturdiness and traffic safety. The project is in keeping with the policy planned for Huntington Beach established in 1974 which PIO 4/81 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION March 5 , 1984 Page Two Subj : STREET MEDIAN SCULPTURE PROJECT "encourages citizens ' groups to create programs which will promote pride in ownership and city identity, and to develop city identity with a coordinated theme, logo, street fixture, and landscaping throughout the city, particularly at city entrances : " FUNDING SOURCE Library Building and Grounds Account 39144o. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Enlarge the project to include more sites initially; table project until a later date ; or reject sculpture project for street medians . ATTACHMENTS Map of intial site for sculptures . MMB:WJ: cs aHHHIi(A �HH�H HtHHHHHi f�1�1� ,, HHH�tHI �HHH mum IHHHH(HH ,� HHtIHHHH HH�HlHlH - HHHHHHH HHHHmH ...� HHHmHIH HHIWill , HHHHHHHHH �♦ HHwHH HHHHHHH �, • HHHHHHH HHHHHHH D HHHHHHH HHIIHH ,�1 ♦ �► H HHHHHHH HHIIHIIHH HH HHHHHoil HH No onnnunio OR IDIOM w EPA on Mq J es REQU.ES f . FOR CITY COU:NCiLz ACTION Date December 16, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City CouncilRON = « APPROVED By CITY Submitted by: Charles.W.,Thompson, City Administra Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director Public Works `E� �i Subject: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; WE— ORANGE �' ORANGE COUNTY ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM (AHFP) . Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The procedures of the Orange County Arterial Highway Financing Program require that the City request inclusion of projects into the yearly road improvement program. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the .attached resolutions requesting that the County of Orange include Brookhurst Street between Adams Avenue. and Atlanta Avenue;. and Bushard Street from Garfield Avenue to Adams Avenue, in the 1983/84 fiscal year Arterial Highway Financing program. ANALYSIS: The _County of Orange yearly sets aside a portion of their Gas Tax Funds, to match City Funds, for construction of road projects under the Arterial Highway Financing Program (AHFP) . Each year cities, by resolution, request that high .priority street projects be fanded.by the County programs. These projects would reconstruct and/or resurface the existing roadway. Travel lanes on this portion of the street were constructed 15 to 20 years ago. Evaluation of the existing pavement -indicates the need for a .rehabilitation project. . FUNDING. SOURCE: Funds not obligated.-at this time. Approved projects would be budgeted for 1983/84. City-County funding on. a 50-50 basis. Project estimates: Brookhurst $504,000 Bushard $640,000 ATTACHMENTS: Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways,. locating the above named projects. Resolutions. PECJM:ik P10 4/81 AMENDMENTS PICNNINu CITY CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL - CLMMSSIpN fAyiC�l ; STREETS AND HIGHWAYS o, — I\ ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 4368-DEC.12.1976 LEGEND FREEWAY STREET CAPACITY ==I I \t MAJOR _45.000 PRIMARY_ 30,000 SECONDARY 20.000 l,\•' vi I NOTE:* -- - I ° SOLID LINES INDICATE EXISTING RIGHT.OF WAY NOT NECESSARILY ULTIMATE RIGHT OFWAY \\ ' I r-_--C{I DASHED LINES INDICATE AREAS WHERE NO RIGHT OF WAY EXISTS . IF L.. \\' �' --- j PROJECT ,' A - --- t- -. -= I BROOKHURST; j� 'PROJECT CITY OF c�,92� - - — HUNTINGTON BEACH - - ,- ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA �� - - REQUES _ FOR CITY COUNCII19ACTION 7 10 S Sr P Date May- 27, 1982 jy GO Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council G1�� �9 Submitted by: C. W. Thompson, 'City Administra Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works Subject: Street Improvements at Huntington Beach Boys & is C Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: ✓ STATEMENT OF ISSUE: In order to.improve traffic safety and complete installation of underground utilities on Yorktown Ave. just east of Huntington St. , dedication of street right-of-way by .the Huntington Beach. Boys and Girls Club is necessary. FT-COMMENDATION: Authorize the preparation of a formal agreement between the City and the Huntington Beach Boys and Girls Club providing for the Club to dedicate necessary street right-of-way on Yorktown Ave. in exchange for the City installing street improvements in front of the Club building on,Yorktown within a period of three years. ANALYSIS: In 1981, the City completed the widening of Yorktown Ave. to a minimum of four lanes be- tween Beach Blvd. and Main Street. Because of the lack of available street right-of-way, there was no curb and gutter and paving beyond the minimum four lanes in front of several parcels on,:Yorktown between .Beach Blvd. and Lake Street. One of these parcels is that which is owned and occupied by the Huntington Beach Boys and Girls Club just east of Huntington Street. In conjunction with the widening of Yorktown, an underground utilities-district was approved and all overhead utilities between Main St. and Delaware St. were-converted to underground. Because necessary right-of-way was not available, the underground facilities were not installed in, front_ of the .Boys and Girls Club. This necessitates considerable additional cost to the Club. in order to extend the underground facilities_ from their current termination at the Club's west property line to the east side of their building where utility connections exist. If necessary, right-of-way can be acquired by the City; the So. California.Edison Co. has agreed to extend underground facilities within the right- of-way across the frontage of the Club property, thereby making the connections by the Club much'easier. and considerably reducing their costs. There are several advantages to the City by.acquiring the .necessary right-of-way and in- stalling the full-.street improvements. These advantages are: 1. Elimination of a future traffic bottleneck for motorists and bicyclists in front of the Club. . 2. Improvement of. drai.nage flow across the frontage of the property on Yorktown. 3. Improvement to the safety for pedestirans by providing a sidewalk along the property. 4. Elimination of a hazardous parking problem in front of the Club. Staff is making the recommendation that right-of-way be .dedicated by the Club in exchange for the installation of street improvements by the City because of the aforementioned advantages to both parties.• If the agreement is approved, the City-will, i.nstall these i f Plo 4/81 / .� Request for Council Action Street Imps. at H.B. Boys & Girls Club May 27, 1982 Page 2 street improvements in conjunction with a larger street improvement project within three years. ALTERNATIVE ANIONS: Do not approve the preparation of'the recommended agreement between the City and the Boys and Girls Club. FUNDING SOURCE: The estimated cost of $15,000.00 for street improvements will be financed from the Gas Tax Fund. ATTACHMENT: Map & Legal Description F.I.R. CWT:PEC:jy I"r 'C-24 uEl U a - _ - x 50 8 x 5, 6 5- 1508 MO 2i rF L �^GE3 _ _ _ EX/57 BOY5 CZ 5TRUCTIIREJ - —��—'— / 494 X •_ - - -= - . 6x N0 lei t >�� X 476 c� o _ vnRKTr)Wj' ��' :r� -�- i PROIC09EO R G/-17-OF �48 3�� WAY TO BE DED/CA.TE:G 5so 2' I • /;� I 'ETANKS,� TANKS PC-231- • _�" --- -- - , � r-•, -_ �-`-, `- _ - t"--�� Qom-" �. _ _� SCALE (9 Q O 105.54 o Q LA1 S 89'S9 r24 �E 104.50 Wo CIO I 1_tz h o Z I YORKTOA,1W AVENUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Street Right of. way, of Boy ' s Club That. portion of the East 104 . 50 feet of the South 208 feet of Lot 2503 of East Side Villa Tract, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded.. in Book 4 , page 65 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the Recorder of said County, as described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 2503; thence North 0000 ' 36 East 17 . 58 feet along the East line of said lot to a point on a non-tangent curve concave .to the Southeast, having a radius of 816 . 15 feet, a . radial line to said point bears South 4016158" East; thence Southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 7`01120" an arch distance of 105. 54 feet, to a point on a line parallel with and 1.04 . 50 feet Westerly measured. at right angles from the East line of said lot; thence South 0000136" West 3. 26 feet along said parallel line to the South line of said lot being parallel with and 30. 00 feet North of the centerline of Yorktown. Street as shown on said East Side Villa Tract; thence South 89059124" East .104 . 50 feet, along said line to the Point of Beginning. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To Charles W. Thompson . From F. B. Arguello City Administrator Chief of Administrative Services Subject Huntington Beach Boys and Girls Date May 27, 1982 Club Street Improvements FIR # 82-22 In response to the request of the Public Works Department, a Financial Impact Report has been prepared and submitted in regards to the proposed Huntington Beach• Boys and Girls Club street improvements. - It has been estimated that an appropriation of $15,000 would be sufficient to fund this project. Adequate monies are available in the Gas Tax Fund for this purpose. Should the City Council approve this appropriation, the unappropriated fund balance would be reduced to $54,973• 1 •t_F. B. Arguello Chief of Administrative Services FBA/MA/cg CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT Project Name Huntington Beach Boys and Girls Club Street Improvements Description Request funding of this proiect. 1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS 1 . 1 One-Time Costs Eand Furn. , aci i- Acquisition Construction ties, Equipment. Other Total -Cost 15,000 15,000 1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs Additional. Materials Outside Payroll Personnel Supplies Services Revenues Total Cost 1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs NA 2. INDIRECT COSTS Loss of City's earning capability due to expenditure of funds. Financial Impact Report Page 2 r 3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS NA 4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT According to the requesting department, this project will correct traffic problems on Yorktown Ave. 5. PROJECT USAGE Daily. 6. EXPENDITURE TIMING Subse;cent to City- CoWncil _aRRroval and possibly after the close of the current fiscal year. 7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT Yorktown Ave. will have to be widened eventually, possibly at a much higher cost.