HomeMy WebLinkAboutCapital Improvement Programs for Compliance with Renewed Mea Council/Agency Meeting Held:_
Deferred/Continued to:
)�Appr ed ❑ conditionally Approved ❑ Denied Ci Jerk' ignatur
Council Meeting Date: August 1, 2011 Departme ID Number: PW 11-038
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2011-47 for Capital Improvement Programs for
Compliance with Renewed Measure M Requirements
Statement of Issue:
In compliance with Renewed Measure M funding eligibility, the City is required to adopt
annually a resolution approving a Seven-Year Measure M Capital Improvement Program
(CIP).
Financial Impact:
No additional funding is required for the resolution. Annual Measure M Turnback allocation is
approximately $2.5 million.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
Adopt Resolution No. 2011-47, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach Adopting Capital Improvement Programs For the Years 2011/2012 Through
2017/2018 For Compliance With Measure M and Proposition 111 Requirements."
Alternative Action(s):
Do not adopt and forego Renewed Measure M funding eligibility. This action would result in
the loss of $2.5 million for the next year, and the loss of allocated and potential grants for
street improvements.
HB -97- Item 7. - I
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 8/1/2011 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 11-038
Analysis: Measure M is the one-half cent sales tax approved by the Orange County voters
in November 1990 for countywide transportation improvements. The original Measure M
lasted twenty years (1991-2011). On November 7, 2006, Orange County voters approved
Renewed Measure M, which extends the program for another thirty years. All Orange
County eligible jurisdictions receive 18 percent of the sales tax revenue based on population
ratio, Master Plan of Arterial Highways centerline miles, and share of countywide taxable
sales. These funds can be used for local projects, as well as ongoing maintenance of local
streets and roads.
There is no competitive criteria to meet, but there are administrative requirements to maintain
eligibility in order to receive funding. A key requirement is the adoption of a Seven-Year
Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The City's current Seven-Year CIP complies with
previously submitted grant applications (Attachment 1 Exhibit "A").
Public Works Commission Action: Not applicable
Environmental Status: Not applicable. For this action, projects are reviewed on an
individual basis during design and prior to award.
Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain, improve and obtain funding for infrastructure and equipment
Attachment(s):
Despription
1. Resolution No. 2011-47, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Adopting Capital Improvement Programs For the Years 2011/2012 Through 2017/2018 For
Compliance With Renewed Measure M and Proposition 111 Requirements."
Item 7. - 2 xB -98-
ATTACHMENT # 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2011-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAMS FOR THE YEARS 2011/2012 THROUGH 2O17/2018 FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH MEASURE M AND PROPOSITION 111 REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, On November 6, 1990,the Orange County voters approved Measure M,the
revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance, a twenty year program(1991-
2011); and
c
On November 7, 2006,the Orange County voters approved Renewed Measure M which is a
thirty year multi-billion dollar program extension of the original Measure M; and
The Renewed Measure M authorized the imposition of a one-half percent sales tax for a
period of thirty years to fund necessary transportation improvements; and
One of the eligibility requirements for Measure M is the adoption of a Capital Improvement
Program for the years 2011/2012 through 2017/2018.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve
as follows:
That the Capital Improvement Program for Measure M and Proposition 111, as set forth in
the attached Exhibit"A" and incorporated by this reference, is hereby adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 1 s t_day of August , 20 11 .
m
a
REVI AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
i anager Director of ublic Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ity Attorney U1
11-2929/65186
Exhibit"A"—Resolution No. 2011-47
E)KO H 100" IT "All
pda Delete a I'Q11,#i t #K9, Gt € r r t D y
Add New tl t2 2'
f0
�
..��1 � d Protect Ie r If �iY Fy ! ttY�,,��t t ,gar }try wt
6 t 319 �
518 Road MfaWt,.rk ProectNa e �:
� enance Arterial Highway Rehabilitation r
`�1gtyCSl, _ a OCTAiPrOj@Ctr# Pf0)@Gt(t1Tltt$!!bCdttgtl ,. r., r��., t$ t �<, Ira
Huntington Beach ijnla i Springdale,Hell Magnolia Garfield Center and Maim v* _
r�`r,'
r �.
xypefOf WorC DescWN
1$1.
rehabilitation of roadway
- I S�� ii tit�'��"�'����c�fPt�'�r2
�ji��r1
"' `rri
�I �rCef ProJeckilascr�pfian{�60�;Characters) � .t
'v and �Magnolia 1 i ff�
Rehabilitation of arterial highways:Springdale(Warnerto Edinger}; Heill(Silver to Goth ),Mag o (ndianapol s r
14 to Adams) Garfield(Beach to Delaware) and Center(Costco Frontage) and Main(Yorktown to Adams) { ri .
g��{.
c i { fls r ,} r s dd s xjv .sriliAg4.- Ii
s r p �{
`lana oure ,r..,{;. .=':4 i ..4 e#s .ay �' # v 7# i=. �} ,
Fund Type Pcnt Current ') Escai;ated Explain Other11U funded
s
Gas Tax 49.30% 1,750,000 1:750,000
Turnback M2 1a.08% 5G0,000 500,000
Other 36 62% 1 300 000 1,300,000 Capital imrovement Reserve
s v
Project�Q�,t°;: ` r.h, #. ..-Y ._. .. { # s+r. �` .r: � ter, f.�tr a, -c +, a rA. +��.'. S•. ;, *���`{°'.grip d �
m
" X
Rhs Esci 1111 92i13 `13114 14115 1'5/1S , +,' , 16I1Z ,,-<C7f18 t;Curr.Cost Esc:CostIiRl
CYes 3 550 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 550 000 3 550 000a
lr*r S '�i 'ck�k' �r'r rctl a y' J aF .�, -�..tJ 3k `tr}j `"r1 �c,.I` a o� [ �a�,Yr�ll �.
c #c�t a 3 �} �..� '�r��'flyt Ct
- � �{ -,�' :�- � �` [ s L 'i y � n- r Gf a F. $���r�`%�����'"f^sa �5 .;( .-?� d`,:x"�r`,:,a ;,f a ,� � �r n•;3•� '• Sf� ��,-�'j����� __
TJ
(D
in
O
J
J.
O
z
O
N
O
I
-P
v
b y 3 E it °h r trt { a yaT 7 ^6�
i A.dti tfew tMaw 1 imete
} Project, ��Projectt �� r eci Project Fod1i a� � [t,
:r.��.ai�,�, �`k--
€ x Find,P;oJect a � r
a
i 4 M�Ci''3
TyptWork ' k... `x aPrOjBstName' t .:� ...,, f n fi
eOf K tiytlah
Road Widening Atlanta Avenue Widening �F� t� 4�Ws Nwi
,s t Y `� � r a to ik G r ti
� ,: OGTA Proaeot# . Project Lftitit87L`4,cat[Ott�`��'� _:`;,� '� :3 ��;
f Huntington Beach 05 HBCH MPAH 2375 �' Atlanta Avenue(Huntington St.to Delaware
iT B Qf WOCk`Desflt " _ � g
i Yp �t r
add 1 lane to existing roadway in project limits � *
r
-
� S f t2 ,"CMraCf@s) 4�,..
This project will widen the south side of Atlanta Avenue from Huntington Street to Delaware Street.
txy M
� g � f � r &
ro
X—P,
I F yp
MPAH e 37cn
53t/o Currenk Escalated Ezpiam Othe�7tJnfunrieif z' � '
ut .
° 652,420 1 6 7,546
t •.:,- .�+- .�� �.,-'_ if ,,.t: .... .�ti�.,,.�-s�'.;,� �'s,�'*...�,�.., ,,:1 .��, t � �' '�'`iE'S F� z� X
Prop 42 62 47% 2 ,50 000 2,7(5 1,4
PPOJBt GOat Y ka f n?
Phs ` Esc! ; 11112 . 12/13 13/14 141, 15/16 1 1671T �,„ 17/18 rr.Cost I Esc Cost
R Yes 3,002,420 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,602,420 3,002 420 +t -
E Yes 100,000 01 0 1 0 0 0 0 loo,0001 100,000z n
l C Yes 0 0 1 300 000 0 0 0 0 1 300 000 1,3 300 a i
vSM1r t � ga .+1�1„,Uj
j,�' 4 �� of € F `iF.+idY �3 {7:i..4�" �.-,� iC7
S u L ' rD
;. z
J
J.
O
z
N
O
-P
v
„;:t” .,r.Zi.=,R� :, ," .o:„e -'S � `i:waC>,%' e?'x'ssh,, x6Y.r'i•t. "'•", ..�",+ E y�d,i..n'1P".�:,eA ..i
,;w;"
Road Maintenance Residential Pavement:Street Overlay
d� ' t Mal
" � N
Huntington Beach >E n/a Citywide Residential Streets
rehabilitation of roadway
Provide rehabilitation of several residential streets throughout the City by providing overlay to extend the useful life y
and improve the appearance and function of the street. •
Fund T -; Pcnt ' Current Escalated Explain�tfier/lJnfunded
Prop 42 �90.70% 9,45 ,000 10:052,242
Prop. 1B 5.94% 619,070 658,523
Turnback M2 3.36% 3593 372.3C1w�
s t hs Esc[ _ 1 /12 epg
-12/13,,,, 13114 14115 M6 � �¢11 T „ 17/1IV` � burr.Cost �_Esc qst-
r,
E Yes F 25,0001 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0 0 125,000 125,000
C Yes 1,994,070 2,075,000 2,075,000 2,075,000 2,075,000 0 0 10,294,070 10,958,070
,qp M
ro
0
o
z
0
N
O
J
M.
WN&I
Other Concrete Replacement
'07,
W 0
Huntington Beach Inia Citywide
other
Replace worn,damaged,lifted,and broken sectoins of concrete sidewalk,curb and gutter at citywide locations.
Construct ADA compliant curb ramps to provide safe pedestrian walkways.
TIN P"
Mind
Type POI 41 iCtifrent"I,- 4$palat6d' ,E Art A Mf[Unfde d
Turnback M2 100.00% 1,300,060 1,364,6001
t
1,U'.- MM PT I
21
4, 14115 1q, t
C Yes 5001000 200,000 200,000 onn Ann 900 An')
0
t-j
All
t
Intersection ads I Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue
Huntingt in Beach -,/a 9 w Intersection of Beach and Warner
,g� "n
AL
add ght turn lane(s)to intersection
Install northbound and wetbound right turn pockets to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion
Fund Escalated•',J,
Expla ifundid'
,,,T ype ME Pcnt Qurrerit
59.83% 209 ODOO 1 2,09,000
ICE 30.12% 10 S 2
Gas Tax b 35,
AAS 114/16'
Phs
E Yes 349,300 0 0
CD
C>
I A
T",F
........... :7
IF
Other Bridge Preventative Maintenancle-Program
ENE
Huntington Beach n/a Warner Bridge,Magnolia Bridge,and Brookhurst
other {
Design and Construction to provide prevenatitive maintenance for City bridges that are aged and in need of
maintenance and minor rehabilitation to extend their design life
--nw 0 41 i ii
05
F4 cn
Type; - P t urreht,,,,-, -"txplain�o
Other 79.46% 1,760,000 1.782,169 BPMP(Federal)
Turnback M2 10.84% 240.000 243,023
Turnback 9.71% 215,000 217,708
NJ
Phs
"I"
tt
E Yes 1 615,000 01 01 01 0 01 0 615,0001615,000
C Yes 700,000 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,600,000 1,627,900
,pp
FLIP
0
0
�.,,e;°»;°:s
qa-Ngg
POW
Intersection Br00khUrst St and Adams Ave
ARM
�; •'� � � � a
,;sa"'`,"
y �y
Huntington Beach n/a Intersectoin of Brookhurst and Adams
add through and right turn lanes to intersection g
Add through lanes and right turn pockets to interesection to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion.
�E
x: ,.
..N ° ...... Z. = �M
an L�
Fund Type I�cnt Current Escalated Explain f)tlier/Unfunded
GMA 18.66% 81,aJ0 81,500 u"
ICE 61.01% 26e. 12 666,512
.° Gas Tax 20.34% 88.6-8 88,838 �
`Phs Esd 11I1 12/f3 1St1d "!4/15 :15/16' 16/17< 17/ti$ Giarr.Cost i'Esc.Cost
E Yes ,5001355,350 O F 0 0 0 0 436,850 436,850
y °
�a
F
y
n.v ";.f��,; ._ ,bnanna .,u.. .a - g,, .�i"�+'r,'.. ..,..... '. .`�a„ Yfi. , - •,'' MMV
r
0
0
FJ
z
41,
N
O
J
IM
IIU
Traffic Signals Goldenwest Street Traffic Signal Synchronization
It'
all
Huntington Beach n/a Goldenwest Street from State Route 22 to Pacific• Coast Highway
vMx,
coordinate"signals within project limits
gi
Proivde operational and infrastructure upgrades including signal timing and installation of fiber optic cable alon
Goldenwest Street. Multijurisdictional project includes Calstrans and City of Westminster and managed my 0
o
NEW
urrefif, Escalated sr
ur�d 6 n t
M2 Signal 74.48% 236,335 236,335
Other 25.52% 80.-95 80,995 QMD Fund
Phs Esel 2' 12JI-3
E Yes 85,818 0 0
C Yes 231,512 0 ol
22W,11
Traffic Signals Talbert Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization and
Huntington Beach n Aa Talbert Ave/Mac Arhtur Blvd from Beach Blvd t
!"Pt State Ro
ute 55 P
coordinate signals within project limits
WIN,
Proivde operational and infrastructure upgrades including signal timing and instilation of fiber optic along Talbert
N . Avenue. Multijurisdictional project includes Caltrans and Cities of Fountain Valley and'Santa Ana and managed
r.
gg, g %41
'durrent`^' in Other/tfift,jnded
I'
2 signal 75.91% 1 22,256 1 22,2561
Other 24.019- 7:064-T-7,064 QMD Fund
1/12 12/1 F 111 14 J1 `6 N,JV
E Yes 14,000 0 01 01 ol
C Yes 15,320 0 01 0
>
0
0
�J
Z
Signals r Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization
n Beach Warner Avenue from Pacific Coast to Red Hills
Huntilngto In/a A Hwy Av
e "
II,'I I L
coordinate signals within project limits
5
Proivde operational and infrastructure upgrades including signal timing and instliation of fiber optic along Warner
Avenue. Multijurisdictional project includes Caltrans and Cities of Fountain Valley,Santa Ana and,Tustin managed
SIM,
-,�,4, Current IRs�calopd, Expla! erMpfunded,
248,085 248,0851
Other 27.68% 94,974
Phs Escl 1 2 12/1
E Yes 88,707 01 01
C Yes 254,352 0
Res. No. 2011-47
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on August 1, 2011 by the following vote:
AYES: Shaw, Harper, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Dwyer, Boardman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Cit Jerk and ex-officio erk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California