Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrange County Municipal Water District - Resolution 1945 - W Q RpoRA?-, City ®f Huntington ijeach California COUNTY GP April 3, 1957 Orange County Water Works District No. 3 P.C. Box 457 Garden Grove, California i ATTN Irvine F. Germans . Supt. Bear Sir, In checking the possibility of City of Hiuntington Beach using Metropolitan date he period through . 1959-60 we cannot definite l ate Aere will be any used except for maintenanc f 1 , such as eater required to Flush the lin y truly yours, J. Lo Henricksen, City Clerk JLH:bd �.� Orange County Water Works District No. 3 IRVINE F. GERMAN, SUPERINTENDENT 11061 GARDEN GROVE BLVD.-MAIL ADDRESS: P. O. BOX 457TELEPHONE LEHIGH 9-4411 RESIDENCE: 10802 GARDEN GROVE BLVD. 0 GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA �� 1. flu All, March 28 1957 City of Huntington Beach John L. Henricksen, Clerk City Hall Huntington .Beach, Calif,. Gentlemen: We have a kequest from Orange County Municipal Water District for estimates of use of Colorado River water through the West Orange County Prater System for the fiscal years 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959--60; the latter fiscal year estimate to be made by months. If you expect to use Colorado, River water during the next three fiscal years please give us ,your estimates promptly so that we can complete ourrareport and forward same to Orange County Municipal 'dater District. Yours very truly, r IFG:wg - Irvine F. German, Supt. P.S. The above request for, estimatee is an annual requirement of Metropolitan Water District. i Ali 4 y� _ 1 , C 011 J � W'��-ER DISTRICT THE METRO ,. �� � � O F S#,r�iJ ��JR�] F t �N IA 3(7 1 H � rJ E E[ f�V � �O�O��� LOS AN`C ORNIA A �lt OFFICE OF ` Itf GENERAL COUNSEL 't7 t FEB 1 3 1959 Mr. John L. Henricksen, City Clerk P.O. .Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Boundary Changes Dear Mr. Henricksen: Receipt is acknowledged of your certificate dated December 15, 1958, regarding changes in boundaries of the City of Huntington Beach which occurred since November 26, 1951 . This information completes our records in respect to the boundaries of your City as of December 15, 1958. For pur- poses of the required statement of change ' of boundaries of our District and map which we filed with the Orange County Assessor on January 30, 1959, and with the State Board of Equalization on February 2, 1959, it was assumed that no change in the boundaries of your City occurred between December 15, 1958 and February 1, 1959. If any such change occurred or should occur after February 1, 1959, please notify us at your earliest convenience and furnish the requisite documents and maps. We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundaries of your City. Very truly yours, Charles C. Cooper, Jr. General Counsel by Alig'V�V�a Deputy General Counsel cc : Orange County Municipal Water District: Mr. Cecil C. Wright, Secretary Mr. W. 0. Gordon, Attorney F THE METROAOLITAN WA�TI✓R DISTRICT OFf SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ',l ,'W. ':S? ( ' , EcFrV ,p 306 WEST THIR D STREET LOS ANGELEzS ,13 CALiiVioRNIA ? OCT 28 1957 OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL 'r' -,�(`�,�"� CW OCT 2 2 1957 Mr. John L. Henricksen City Clerk Post Office Box 190 City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Henricksen; East Annexation Receipt is acknowledged of documents and map pertain- ing to the annexation to the City of Huntington Beach on October 7, 1957, of inhabited territory designated "East Annexation" . It is noted that the annexed area is all within the boundaries of the Metropolitan Water District as a part of the Original Area of Orange County Municipal Water District. We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundaries of your City. Very truly yours, Charles C. Cooper, Jr. General Counsel John M. Dave ort Deputy General Counsel tatement of Expenditures >-,,-de by the City on their interests in the Metropolitan Water System. 4/l/59 1953 - Survey Fund No. 1 - Engineering $ 11,000.00 1954 - Survey Fund No. 2 - Professional Services 806.00 1954 - W.O.C. Water Board Professional Services 50.00 W.O.C. Water Board Operating Expend 19254.00 W.O.C. Water Board Constr. Fund 299011.00 1955 - W.O.C. Water Board Operating Expense 614.00 W.O.C . Water Board Constr. Fund 484,723.00 W.O.C. Water Board Constr. Fund 219253.00 1956 - W.O.C . Water Board Operating Expense 470.00 W.O.C. Water Board Constr, Fund 84,275.00 W.O.C. Water Board Constr. Fund 72,566.00 W.O.C . Water Board Constr. Fund 30.00 1957 - 1955 - Water Bond Interest Redemption Fund 74,564.00 W.O.C . Water Board - Maint. & Operation Fund 977.00 1958 - 1955 - Water Bond Interest 8s Redemption Fund 5.7,835.00 W.O.C. Water Board - Maint. & Operation Fund 2,600.00 1959 - 1955 - Water Bond Fund - Constr. & Expenditure 269496.00 1955 - Water Bond - Interest & Redemption Fund 576,025.00 W.O.C. Water Board - Maint. & Operation Fund 31,179.00 Total to date 04�s t .8.00 I LITA THE METRO P ' r WiT�ER DISTRICT OF /O�UTH E RAN A I�F`tt NIA oFo 1 30�6 EST THIR STREET W LOS A ELEA>S I32 @�LRIFORNIA t �'/j` `9u"'q f OFFICE OF \`��� ���0&i `,., •!'fr �,, i GENERAL COUNSEL DEC 1 4 1959 'x Mr. John L. Henricksen City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Henricksen: Boundary Changes Our District is required by statute to file with the State Board of -Equalization and with the County Assessor a statement of changes of its boundaries together with a map in- dicating such changes not later than February first of each year. Enclosed is a form of certificate, in duplicate, showing those boundary changes which have occurred in the City of Huntington Beach since December 15, 1958, records of which were received from your office. In order that our statement and map may be prepared before February first, and that the boundaries of your City may be correctly represented as of that date, it would be greatly appreciated if you will complete the certificate and return one copy to us not later than January 4, 1960. If there are changes which have occurred or which will become effective on or before January 31, 1960, other than the one indicated by us on the attached form of certificate, please list such changes on the certificate and- file the usual documents and map of each change with our District, together with the date on which documents were filed with the Secretary of State, for each such change . We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundary changes of your City as each change occurs. h � • " a ,' Mr. John L. Henricksen City Clerk Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Charles C. Cooper, Jr. General Counsel By Wi la4—.Sar'sI ns j Deputy General Counsel Encl. No. 3241 cc : Orange County Municipal Water District: Mr. Cecil C. Wright, Secretary Mr. W. 0. Gordon, Attorney y EDMUND G.BROWN GOVERNOR GOVERNOR'S OFFICE °q<.,.owa SACRAMENTO September 23, 1960 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones : Thank you for your letter of September 13, enclosing Resolution No . 1434 adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach concerning contractual nego- tiations by the State and the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Please assure the members of your council that the state officials concerned with this problem, including myself, are doing everything in their power to reach agreement with the Metropolitan Water District on a mutually agreeable contract. It should be borne in mind that the state water program, is designed to benefit the entire state and it is the responsibility of the state officials participating in these negotiations to draft terms which insure equitable treatment to all agencies who will be contracting for state project water. Please convey to the members of your council my sincere appreciation of the active interest they are showing in this very vital water development program. Sincerely EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor September 13, 1960 The Honorable Edmund C. Brown !Governor of California Sacramento g California Sir, Vie are transmitting herewith a cear ified, copy of r Resolution No. 1434 of the City Council of 4e City of r Huntington Beachg California9 relating to water contract negotiations in completing and executing a �ontract with The Metropolitan Vater District. f We urge that you give this Resolutionlyour consider- ation in the handling of this matter. f Resp#ctfully yoursg i t}1 G. Jones y City Clerk PCJ$lcb Encl. F J, f i September 13, 1960 Mr, Raymond S. Hudson, Public Relations Representative The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 306 West Tbird Street Los Angeles 13# California Dear Sir, We are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No, 1434 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach passed and adopted by that body on the 6th day of September, 1960. A Certified copy of this Resolution has been trans- mitted to the Honorable Edmund G. Browng Governor of California, with a request that he give due consideration of this matter in his dealings with The Metropolitan rVater District* Sincerely yours, Paul 0. Jones, City Clerk PCJ81cb Enel, MAY 10, 1960 STATEMENT BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Concerning the Preliminary Recommendations of Special Master Simon H. Rifkind Announced in the Press May 9, 1960 In the Arizona-California Colorado River Supreme Court Suit It is most timely that the Preliminary Report of the Special Master in the Arizona water case should be announced on the eve of the dedication (May 11) of the completed Colorado River Aqueduct of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The announcement brings this entire water development program into sharp relief throughout the United States. It serves to emphasize nationwide the extraordinary community accomplishment that has been brought to pass in Southern California by the building of the Colorado River Aqueduct. At the same time there is revealed the inescapable need of the Aqueduct in providing water for millions of living people here and now. In some of the interpretations of the Special Master's recommendations thus far reported, dire conse- quences have been forecast for many areas within the Metropolitan Water District. These forecasts of disaster are without foundation in fact. They do serve to emphasize the vital importance of the water service being extended in Southern California by the Aqueduct, but unfortunately they serve also to incite a degree of panic that is unjustified and acutely harmful to the welfare of all Southern California. The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District has pledged itself to provide the people in its service area with the water they need when and as they need it. A public record of that pledge was first made in December 1952. It since has been reaffirmed from time to time by the District's Board of Directors. It is to be once more reaffirmed at the dedication of the Colorado River Aqueduct on May 11, 1966. In December 1952, the Board of Directors said: "When and as additional water resources are required to meet increasing needs for domestic, industrial and municipal water, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California will be prepared to deliver such supplies." That pledge and that policy once more is repeated and reaffirmed. Giving attention directly to the possible effects of the Special Master's recommendations, should they be approved by the Supreme Court, the following factual conditions should be borne in mind: The economy of Southern California, including all areas within the Metropolitan Water District, will not be adversely affected at this time or for many years to come. This is for the reason that the actual water available to the Colorado River Aqueduct, because of the Special Master's recommendations, would not be reduced for a number of years. The date of such a water reduction, resulting from any court order, would possibly be as remote as two generations away. It certainly could not be effected sooner than twelve to fifteen years. This is because of the quantity of water now physically available in the river, and the time span required r-. for new project authorizations and construction. Water losses to the entire Colorado River Basin resulting from prolonged and extreme drouths is another cause entirely unconnected with judicial decrees. California bases its right to its full contract share of Colorado River water, not upon a claim of impending famine and devastation, but upon a record of its fair contract rights and its investment, in good faith, of $500 million in the construction of the works required to carry out these contracts, and serve the needs of some eight million people. The Special Master's recommendations appear to be consistent with the theory that the Federal Govern- ment possesses plenary and overriding power to control and use for its own purposes the water in the Colorado and other streams arising in the public domain. This development throws a disturbing question across the water rights involved in many California streams. It raises a threat to the validity of contracts for the delivery of water from these streams. It, in effect, sounds a warning to all prospective contractors for such water, to proceed with caution and care. It,reminds our people of the long years and bitter struggle and heavy expenses that have gone into the defense of Southern California's Colorado River contracts. Recent developments in the Arizona water case remind our people, with a startling impact, that there must be undertaken an immediate and extensive program of replenishing underground water basins in Southern California. This is a conservation program long urged by the Metropolitan Water District and one now under way to a limited extent. There is no question from any responsible quarter as to the availability now of Colorado River water to carry forward such an underground water replenishment program. We are now dedicating to the service of the people a full capacity Aqueduct ready and able to deliver this replenish- ment water. Accordingly, it is hereby recommended that the next Legislature be requested to appropriate between $20 and $30 million to help meet the cost of launching a major water replenishment program to be carried forward during the next 10 to 15 years while the people in the Metropolitan Water District service areas are approaching their day-by-day use of a full Aqueduct flow. It has become increasingly clear that the State should be prepared to invest State funds in the conservation of its water resources through underground water replenishment, as well as on essential flood control works. It should be made clear to all that there is no dispute as to the need for the development and use in Southern California of surplus water in Northern California. However, it is essential in this connection that Southern California water problems and-programs be kept in proper perspective. This means that, in planning and preparing for Northern water, the actual and existing water supply here and now available from the Colorado River cannot safely be ignored, or overlooked, or minimized. Colorado River water is imperatively required to meet the increasing needs of our people while the way is made clear for additional water from Northern sources. Those who seek to incite the baseless scare of a water famine are doing the economy, the business, the sources of employment, and all the people of Southern California a fearful disservice. The Special Master's recommendations in the Arizona water case dramatically point up to all Southern Californians the urgent need for united action toward our common water goals—a united action based on mutual trust and faith that what is good for all is good for each of our areas and our water agencies. Let us therefore go forth sanely and surely in the protection of the water we have brought to our homes and factories, and the development of new and assured supplies to meet this region's needs in future years. UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED n Rt COMMENTS co j? •� rT BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CAL RELATIVE METROPOLITAN ACT AMENDMENTS t�79 PROPOSED BY LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND �� I April 12, 1560 The Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles has submitted to The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and has circulated widely to legislators and water agencies in California proposed revisions of the State Act under which the Metropolitan Water District operates. These proposed revisions are based upon the contention that a constituent area of the Metropolitan Water District in meeting a share of the cost of an imported water supply should be required to pay only for the actual water for which It contracts in advance of possible usage or need without regard to the assessed valuation of its lands or properties benefited by the water supply made available for use as and when required. The Department of Water and Power has advanced claims and figures based on its assumption that under the Metropolitan Water District Act all capital costs of a water project are borne by tax- payers and that none of such costs are borne by water users. Such assumption is incorrect and ignores the applicable facts and the policy of the Metropolitan Water District. Water users in the District have paid and are paying substantial sums on capital costs as well as all operating expenses. It is the policy of the Metropolitan Water District Board of Directors to bring about the payment of all such charges from water revenues as soon as practicable. The same policy should pertain to the development of the project for the delivery of water from Northern California. -2- A Radical and Crippling Change The Los Angeles Department is seeking to radically alter the character and purpose of the Metropolitan Water District so as to deprive the District of its ability to continue to perform those duties by which it successfully has developed and operated the District' s Colorado River Aqueduct. These crippling changes would not only apply to the securing of Northern water, but also would impair the future operation of the District as to Colorado River water. All Parts of M.W.D. Benefited Spokesmen for the Los Angeles Department make the claim that a water supply project constructed and operated to deliver water from Northern sources to areas in the Metropolitan Water District should be paid for only by member agencies which choose to contract for water in advance. For this vital service these spokesmen contend there should be no taxes paid by areas within the District which believe they temporarily do not need the imported water. They further contend that the assessed valuation of the Metropolitan Water District as a whole should at no time be the basis for collecting tax contributions to help meet Southern California' s share of the construction and interest costs of the proposed Feather River Project. This, despite the fact that imported water from Northern sources will support and greatly increase, the value of all land, improved and unimproved, within the entire area of the Metropolitan Water District. -3- No Water Revenues in Early Years The Metropolitan Water District, functioning under a State Act for more than thirty years, has financed, built and is operating the water supply system from the Colorado River to serve the cities and areas which have chosen by the votes of their people to become parts of the District. The Colorado River Aqueduct is essentially a domestic, industrial and municipal water supply system. In the development and operation of such a water supply project there, of course, can be no revenues derived from the sale of water during the period of construction which, in the instance of the Colorado River Aqueduct, covered a span of more than eight years. Engineering authorities generally agree that it will take from six to ten years to complete the work required to deliver Northern California water to the service area of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. That means a long period of from six to ten years with no water sales revenues whatever. A domestic and municipal water supply system does not begin to deliver water up to its full capacity as soon as it has been placed in operation. If this were the case it would be necessary immediately to start construction work on still another water supply project. It has been the experience of the Metropolitan Water District that relatively small quantities of water are used from a new supply source during the early years of its operation. Consequently, the revenues derived from the sale of water, regardless of the rates -4- charged, are small in comparison to the funds required to meet construction, interest and operating costs. This means that the funds required to meet capital and operating costs in the early years of a new domestic water supply project must come from taxes or revenues from other sources. Equal Taxes For All The base tax rate fixed by the Metropolitan Water District is the same for all parts of the District, just as the base tax rate of a California city or county is the same for all parts of any given city or county. These taxes are paid by all of the taxpayers, even though the service paid for may not be wanted or needed by many of the affected taxpayers. Taxpayers with no school age children, for example,, are required to pay school taxes the same as taxpayers with a large family of school age children. No one ever has seriously advocated that the school, police, fire, library, parks and playground taxes, for example, be apportioned among the taxpayers in strict accordance with the individual taxpayers' use or need for such municipal services from year to year. By the same token, it would be practically impossible to apportion water taxes among the residents of a given area years in advance of need and before there are any water revenues. It was not done in Los Angeles or in any other city. On the contrary, under such conditions, bonds paid for by taxes were issued. -5- Available Water Increases Values It has long been recognized that in the early operating years of a water supply system there are two classes of beneficiaries. They are : (1) the people (taxpayers ) using the water to meet their present needs; (2) the people (taxpayers) who do not use the new supply in early years, either because their land is as yet undeveloped and unimproved or because of the availability of another water supply adequate temporarily to meet their needs. This second group also is benefited because the new water supply stands available for use as and when needed and, even more important, because the new water supply is actually sustaining and increasing the value of the unimproved land which is assured an ample water supply whenever its improvement takes place. Metropolitan Water Supports Los Angeles City Values During 1959, 16c,'o' of the water used by Los Angeles City consumers came from the Metropolitan Water District. At the same time, Los Angeles used its local and Owens River water supplies to the fullest possible extent. (It should be understood that the Owens River Aqueduct is owned by and serves exclusively the City of Los Angeles. It supplies water to no other part of the Metropolitan Water District. ) Taking into account the Metropolitan water being used, it can fairly be stated that at least 16go of the assessed valuation of City of Los Angeles land and improvements even now depend upon the -6- 16,E supply of Metropolitan Water District Aqueduct water. In 1959 Los Angeles ' total assessed valuation was $4,380,000,000; 16% of this amounts to about $700,000,000 of Los Angeles' assessed valuation now being supported and increased by M. W. D. water. And this proportion of Los Angeles ' assessed valuation and the sustaining water supply from the M. W.D, are rapidly and constantly increasing. This $700 million of Los Angeles ' assessed valuation that is now dependent upon M. W.D. water is more than four times greater than the total of $168,800,000 in taxes paid from the City of Los Angeles to the Metropolitan Water District during the entire life of the Colorado River Aqueduct project -- or since 1929. It is more than three times greater than the $205,800,000 which Los Angeles spokesmen claim .that Los Angeles would pay as its share of the Feather River Project if all capital costs were paid by uniform District taxes. In addition, the City of Los Angeles derives great economic benefits from being the financial and business center of the Metropolitan Water District area. Costly Complications The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California now includes as constituent units 13 cities, 9 municipal water districts and one county water authority. The Los Angeles proposed amendments to the Metropolitan Act would require the Metropolitan Water District to endeavor to make separate contracts with each of the 23 District entities for fixed amounts of Northern water. It would therefore follow that before the Metropolitan Water District could contract with -7- the State of California for any definite amount of water, the District would be required to hold contracts from each of its component parts willing to contract for Northern water. A marked delay in the procurement of one such contract could prevent or indefinitely block the signing of a firm water delivery contract be0ween the Metropolitan Water District and the State. Such a delay could disastrously affect the entire California Water Project so far as the delivery of water to Southern California is concerned. Other amendments to the Metropolitan Act proposed by the Los Angeles Department would require the Metropolitan Water District to obtain individual contracts with each of its units before building aqueduct facilities to serve these units and would prevent the Metropolitan Water District from constructing aqueduct facilities for the ,joint use and benefit of all its members without contractual consent of all such members. Low Cost Of A Vital Service The Metropolitan Water District tax bill being paid by the people of Los Angeles and the other cities and areas within the Metropolitan Water District represents one of the smallest tax items on city and county tax bills. The Metropolitan Water District tax levy has been steadily reduced from its highest level of 500 per $100 of assessed valuation in 1945-46 to 170 in 1959-60. Thus the M. W. D. tax rate in 1959-60 is 170, out of a typical Los Angeles city, county and special district total tax rate of about $8.00 per $100 of assessed valuation. -8- The DistrictIs water charges now pay, not only all costs of operation and maintenance, but also pay a substantial part of the capital costs, and increasingly are relieving the taxpayers of their tax burden. By the application of this same policy, a substantial part of the capital cost of bringing water from Northern California to Southern California will be borne by water users. Only Token Payments Proposed The proposals being made by the Los Angeles Department, should they become effective, would remove the City of Los Angeles and certain other sections of the Metropolitan Water District from the obligation to make anything other than token payments for the vital benefit of having Northern water available and ready to use as and when needed in Southern California. In fact, the Los Angeles Department proposal would, in effect, relieve about half of the entire Metropolitan Water District from any substantial payments. This would shift the full burden for the Metropolitan Water, Districts share of the cost of Northern water to the taxpayers and water users in the other half of the Metropolitan Water District. Financially this would be completely unworkable and would kill the entire Northern water project so far as Southern California is concerned. Water Rates Ultimately To Pay All Costs It is evident that capital and operating costs of a large domestic water supply system cannot all be paid, initially or for a -9- number of years, from water revenues alone. The Metropolitan Aqueduct is now delivering water up to more than one-half of its full capacity. Accordingly, the District Board of Directors on March 8 adopted a schedule of increasing water rates extending to 1963, and planned on a basis designed ultimately to return sufficient water sales revenues to meet the District' s Colorado River Aqueduct costs including all bond retirement and interest charges. Under the District's policy, beginning in the year 1963, the selling price per acre foot of untreated water for domestic uses from the Colorado River should be not less than the price at which it would be sold if the aqueduct were operating at full capacity in its completed form and were entirely paying its own way from sale of water for domestic uses, including interest and bond retirements and any amounts needed for reserves and such other sums as would otherwise be collected from taxes payable that year. Underground water replenishment avoids building excessively expensive surface storage with attendant evaporation, tying up District capital in stored water, and provides a dependable and important source of water for the .peak summer period. Of even more importance this helps to establish a dependable source of water in the area of greatest population and valuation for use in case of war, catastrophes, breakdowns, or years of water shortage. Therefore, taxpayers should support the deficit made necessary in selling surplus water for agricultural and replenishment purposes -10- The method of collecting taxes of. the District must continue to be based upon assessed valuation of the taxable property within the District. Until an aqueduct operates at full capacity the excess of all costs over the amount received from water sales will continue as at present to be paid by the taxpayers. It follows that when an aqueduct is operating at full capacity the taxpayer thereafter will be relieved of any tax burden, except as to water for agriculture and replenishment. A Unified Effort Will Assure Success While no definite date can be established as to when the Colorado or Northern aqueduct will be operating at full capacity, on the basis of general experience it should be within the first 30 years of the life of the bonds which are sold to construct the aqueduct. This will be approximately true of the water from the Colorado River. It should also be approximately true of Northern water. For the reasons that have been cited and because of many other conditions which serve to make the Los Angeles proposals impracticable, the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California cannot approve the suggested amendments to the Metropolitan Water District Act submitted by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. The same basic principles that apply to the highly successful financing and operation of the Colorado River Aqueduct should also pertain to the development of the project for the delivery of water from Northern California. If the importation of water from Northern -11- California gives rise to new problems, the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California stands ready to confer with any of the constituent units of the District. By a unified effort carried forward in mutual good will, a structure of operation and financial policies that will serve the highest interests of all the people of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California will be assured. THE METROPO,�LlTAN� U�A�TER DISTRICT OF�SOUTHERN CAZifF( NIA 310, VVE T, THIRD 'STiTtEET LO S AN",,, &S ,I3, CAI Ir Tf fF,O R N I A OFFICE OF -'�``�, f}( Q, �1 ,", GENERAL COUNSEL Nmvember 15, 1961 Mr . Paul C. Jones City Clerk City Hall - 5th and Orange Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr . Jones:- The governing body of your corporate entity, on or before the tenth day of .December, 1961, may declare its intention to pay out of its municipal funds the whole or a stated percentage of the amount of taxes to be derived from the area of The Metropolitan water District of Southern California lying within your corporate entity, as such amount of taxes shall be fixed in August, 1962, by resolution of the Board of Directors of our District in levying taxes for the fiscal year 1962-1963 (Section 8.1 or Section 8.2 of the Metropolitan Water District Act, Statutes 1927, page 694, as amended; Deering's General Laws', Act 9129) . Unless such declaration of intention be made and `certified in the manner and within the time prescribed by the appli- cable section of the statute, your governing body will be unable next August to elect to pay out of the municipal funds if your corpo- rate entity any portion of our District's taxes levied for the fiscal year 1962-1963 . if your corporate entity desires to make such declaration, one set of the documents specified in the statute should be furnished to the Controller of this District, and a duplicate set of such docu- ments (omitting any required map or plat) should be forwarded direct- ly to the undersigned. In making such declaration, strict compliance with the statutory requirements will be necessary, and this effice will be pleased to furnish such assistance as may be requested. If your corporate entity does not desire to make such declara- tion, the District's taxes will be levied and collected in the usual way, and it will not be necessary to take further action or to reply to this letter. Kindly bring this matter to the early attention of your govern- ing body. A copy of this- letter is enclosed with the request that you transmit it to your attorney. Very truly yours, Charles C. Cooper, Jr. General Counsel Encl. y Jo- n M. Davenport Deputy General Counsel spy Vo ti �4 THE METROIQ`LI` AfNxj �W','7�ER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN AII- C tNIA �i�1 rSUT`dSET B• ULFi'VARD' LOS '`AN`GBLES, CALI ' IA RN OFFICE OF ARM BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 JOSEPH JENSEN,CHAIRMAN LOS ANGELES 54. CALIF. WARREN W. BUTLER,VICE CHAIRMAN PHONE 624-9261 FRED A. HEILBRON,SECRETA- May 6, 1964 AREA CODE 213 The Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach P. 0. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: You will find enclosed a copy of a resolution adopted by our Board of Directors approving the new water plan for the Pacific Southwest which is the subject of Senate Bill 2760 that has now been introduced by Senator Kuchel. I This enlarges upon the Secretary of Interior's modified Pacific Southwest plan and makes it a truly regional proposal with the objective of solving critical water problems of the entire Colorado River Basin. The Secretary's plan considered only Northern California as a source of new water. The Kuchel bill calls for a thorough investigation and report by the Secretary covering all possibilities for importing adequate quantities of additional water into the basin for future needs. Further, this proposed legislation would protect California's rights to 4.4 million acre-feet annually from the Colorado and thus guarantee the continuing usefulness of the District's Colorado River Aqueduct. We believe Senator Kuchel's bill represents an epochal advance in the search for a long-range answer to the water needs of all the states of the Colorado River Basin. May we ask that you give this proposed act your valuable support by passage of a resolution endorsing it and by sending copies of the resolution to Governor Brown and the representatives of your area in the State Legislature and in Congress. Very truly yours, oseph Jen e Enclosure Chairman t t RES OLUT ION 6493 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND EN- DORSING THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PROJECT ACT PROPOSED BY THE SIX AGENCY COMMITTEE REPRESENTING THE CALIFORNIA USERS OF COLORADO RIVER WATER WHEREAS, S. 1658, authorizing the Central Arizona Project, is pending before the Congress and such bill if enacted would create serious water supply problems for Southern California and would impede the solution of the water supply problems of the Pacific Southwest and the entire Colorado River Basin; and WHEREAS, Secretary of the Interior Udall has proposed a Pacific Southwest Water Plan which if adopted would ultimately result in abandonment of the Metropolitan Water District 's Colorado River Aqueduct, which now furnishes a source of water for nine million people, without assuring an adequate replacement supply of water for Southern California and without providing a solution to the many other existing and future Colorado River water supply problems; and WHEREAS, the Six Agency Committee, representing the users of Colorado River water in Southern California, has caused to be drafted a proposed Pacific Southwest Project Act for the purpose of meeting the present and future water demands of the Pacific Southwest region by providing for the transfer of water from areas of surplus to areas of deficiency; and WHEREAS, said proposed act would provide for protection of existing California uses of Colorado River water to the extent of 4,400,000 acre-feet per year, would authorize the Central Arizona Project, Dixie Project, and Southern Nevada Water Supply Project and Moapa Valley Pumping Project, and would require investi- gation and report by the Secretary of the Interior as to additional supplies of water to sustain the present development of the region, provide for normal growth, improve the quality of the water in the River and reduce the potential problems for the Upper Basin of the Colorado River: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, that the Pacific Southwest Project Act proposed by the Six Agency Committee J , . 2 - as a means for augmenting and developing the water resources of the Colorado River be approved and endorsed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be sent to Senators Thomas H. Kuchel and Clair Engle, to the members of the California Delegation in the House of Representa- tives, to Governor Edmund G. Brown, to Attorney General Stanley Mosk, to Administrator of the Resources Agency of the State of California Hugo Fisher, to Director of Water Resources William E. Warne, to members of the California Legislature, to each of the constituent agencies of the District, and to the Boards of Super- visors of Counties and to City Councils of Cities within the District. I HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, at its meeting held April 14, 1964. `X- 1 Executive Secretary The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 4 N a THE METROPOLITANY Wi4TER DISTRICT r . j OF rSOUTHfiRN' AEIFORNIA SUNSET..B�ULEVARD; LOS �ANGELES, CAIIFORNIA P3G� ate` t -c MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES 54. CALIF. OFFICE OF PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER AND CHIEF ENGINEER AREA CODE 213 P1r. Paul C. Jones MAR 6 1964 City_,Clerk City Hall P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California . Dear I'Ir. Jones: Boundary Changes 8eceit is acknowledged of your certificate dated December 23, 1993, regarding changes in the boundaries of the City of Huntington Beach which occurred since December 26,1962. This information completes our records in respect to the boundaries to your City as of December 23, 1963 . For purposes of the required statement .of change of boundaries of our District and map which we filed with the Orange County Assessor and with the State Board of Equalization on January 31, 1964, it was assumed that no change in the boundaries of your City occurred between December 23, 1963, and January 31, 1964. If any. such change did occur, or if changes should occur in the future, please continue to notify us at your earliest convenience and furnish the requisit' documents and maps. We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundaries of your City. Veryy truly your ., .A. ' ginner Gener tianager and Chief. Engineer cc: Orange County Municipal Water District Mr. Cecil C. Wright, Secretary Its. W.O. Gordon, Attorney -N THE MFTROI@`LIT 'N �aWi -ER DISTRICT OF 4"'OUTHERN AIQI2NIA LO5�� I 'SUNSET� BULVAIL�D�.•, r,- n II ANGELES, ,CAL-IF NIA OFFICE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 JOSEPH JENSEN.CHAIRMAN LOS ANGELES 54, CALIF. WARREN W.BUTLER,VICE CHAIRMAN PHONE 624-9261 FRED A. HEILBRON,SECRETARY � AREA CODE 213 March 25, 1964 The Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Sirs: You will find enclosed a copy of the statement in opposition to the modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan that was adopted by our Board of Directors by unanimous vote. May we urge that you pass a resolution supporting us in opposing this plan and, if this should be done, that copies be sent to Governor Brown and the representatives of your area in the State Legislature and in Congress. Such action on your part would be of significant assistance in safeguarding the water future of all Southern California. Very truly yours, Jo s`eph ensen, e' airm Enclosure STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ON SECRETARY OF INTERIOR UDALL' S MODIFIED PACIFIC SOUTHWEST WATER PLAN March 17, 1964 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California opposes Secretary of the Interior Udall ' s modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan because it would result in the abandonment of the District' s Colorado River Aqueduct. It is unthinkable that any Federal or State administration should advance, as part of a regional water plan, a proposal which would render useless an aqueduct now providing an indispensable source of water for the 9, 000, 000 people of this District. The District fully concurs in the principle that the water problems of the arid Southwest can best be solved by the cooperative action of all interests in the area. Further, it approves of the concept of a regional water development fund dedicated to the complete utilization and con- servation of the water resources of all the Pacific Southwest. It believes that, instead of the proposal by the Secretary for enlarging a section of the California Aqueduct, the first Federal monies spent in California under any regional plan should contribute support to the State Water Plan and be used for the development of the water resources of this State' s North Coastal area for Califor- nia' s future growth. The Pacific Southwest Water Plan in its present form offers the District at most only feasibility studies for 550, 000 acre-feet of Northern California water annually as a replacement for part of -Z- its present Colorado river supply. This would be replacement of less than half of the 1, 212, 000 acre-feet per year which the Secretary has heretofore contracted to deliver to this District and upon which the District relied in constructing its aqueduct. The plan offers nothing -to make up this shortage or to provide for the greater future needs of the District. To really accomplish what its name implies, the Pacific Southwest Water Plan should be expanded to require present authorization of projects providing for the future water supply of Southern California. The District endorses the program incorporated in the plan for the conservation and salvage of water along the Lower Colorado. However, it urges that this entire program be instituted at once. The District believes the proposed plan is seriously deficient because of the absence of any consideration of the possi- bilities of transporting water into the Pacific Southwest from sources other than Northern California, such as the Snake River. The District urges that such studies be made. The plan is critically defective because it fails to recognize and preserve the rights of existing projects in the State of California to priorities to the annual consumptive use of 4.4 million acre-feet of water from. the Colorado River . To put this another way, California is asking for only the same protection that the State of Arizona by statute in 1961 recognized, under the basic, 100-year-old principle of Western water law, for its own existing projects against the proposed Central Arizona Project. O In place of protection for California' s valid water rights, the plan proposes that the Metropolitan Water District surrender its rights to Colorado River water in reliance upon promises of substitute water. These promises depend upon the actions of future Congresses and the doubtful sufficiency of the regional water development fund, as presently proposed, to accomplish all. its objectives. It is the conviction of the Metropolitan Water District that those who desire new works diverting water from the Lower Colorado River should face the hazards of such promises rather than the taxpayers of this District who have built an aqueduct system representing an investment of more than a half-billion dollars . The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. is determined -to carry out its obligations to its people to provide them with water and to do all in its power to protect their huge invest- ment in this existing and functioning water supply system. April 10, 1964 , West Orange County Water Board. P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,, California Attention. Paul C'. Jones Secretary Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach ,,at their regular meeting held April 6, 1964, passed 'and adopted Resolution No. 19450 opposing the Modi• fled Pacific Southwest Water Plan and supporting the position of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan in ;order to safeguard the water future of all South.. ern California. Sincerely yours,, Paul. C. Jones City Clerk 1'CJ ED .tr Bnc: Rea,. #1945 O [PY I. April 10t 1964 Honorable Robert E. Badham State, Capital Building Sacramento, Cal ifornia- Dear Sir The City Council of the City of .Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April 6 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 1945, opposing the Modi.* fled Pacific Southwest hater flan and supporting the osition of the Metropolitan Water District of Bout ern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your suppoft in apposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan in order to safeguard the water future of all "South. ern California. Sincerely yours.. Paul C. Junes City Clerks lPCJ N R tr Enc� Res. #1945 o o . April 10 , 1964 146norable James E. Whetmore State Capitol Building Sacramento*. California: Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Apri1 .6, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 045,, opposing the Modi. fied Pacific Southwest Water Flan and supporting the position of the Metropolitan Aster 'District of Southern California. The . Council -di.retted that a copy of Resolution No. t945 be forwarded to you and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Flan in order to safeguard the water future of al South.- ern California. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ*E-D 'tr Enc. Res. #1945 a O PY April 10, 1964 Honorable William lE, Dannemeyer State Capitol Building Sacramento,. California Dear Sir: The City Council of . the City of .Huntington� Beach at their regular meetin held April 6, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution go.. 1945, opposing the Modi fled pacific Southwest Water Plot and supporting the position of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your supportiin 0 ppo6ing the Modified Pacific. Southwest Water-Plan in order to safeguard thre. water future of gall South- ern California. Sincerely yours, I Paul C: Janes City Clerk PCJEDtr 1Enc: Ides. #1945 o � April 10,. 1964 Honorable Johan A. Murdy, Jr. State Capitol Building Sacramento,; California Dean Sirs The City Council: of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April 6, 1964, passbd :and adopted Resolution No. 1945, opposing the Modi.. ied Pacific Southwest Water Plan and supporting the position of the Metropolitan dater District of. South:. ern California. The Council directed that a ,copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan in order to safeguard the water future of all: South. ern California. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJRD;tr lnc Res. #1945 OFDY April, 10,. 1964 Honorable Thomas Kuchel Senate Office-Buildinig Washington 25, D.C. Dear Sir. The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April 6, 1964 passed and adapted Resolution No. , 1.945, opposing t�e Modi. fied Pacific Southwest Water Plan and supporting the position of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Council directed that a copy.of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan in order to safeguard the water future of all: Southern California. Sincerely yours, Paul: C. Jones City Clerk PCJ=lED tr Enc Res. #1945 April to, 1964 Honorable James . S. Utt House Office Building Washington 25, D.C. Dear Sit '.the. Ci-ty Council 6 , the City of Huntibgton Beach at their regular meeti held aril 6, 1964, .passed and adopted Resolution Oo. 045 opposi andng the P�od�.• fled Pacific Southwest dater Plansupporting the ppoosition of the Metropolitan Water Vistriet of . Southern California. The Council directed that a copy. cif Resolution No. 1945 he forwarded to .yc,u and urges your support in apposing the ►dif�.ed Pacific Southwept Water Plan " in order to safeguard the water future of all South.. .ern California. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ ED:tr Ent; Res. #1945 o Co > April to, 1964 Honorable Richard T. Hanna 1516 Lo gworth House Office Building Washington 25 D.C. Dear Sir: The City Council of the Cotty of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April 6, 1964, passed and adopted.. Resolut on No. 1945, opposing the Modi• fled Pacific Southwest hater Plan and supporting the pp®sition of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you: and urges your support in opposing the ,Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan in order _to safeguard the water future of all South- ern California. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJEDtr Enc Res. #1945 COPY I April 10, 1964 f - i r Honorable Edmund G. Brown State Capitol Building . Sacramento. Catifoiiiia Dear. Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Apiil b, t964,_ passed and adopted Resolution No. 1945# opposing the Modi.. fled Pacific Southwest Water plan and supporting the osition of the Metropolir; Water- District of Southern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution Nip. 1945 be forwarded to yuu and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest stater Plan in order to safeguard the water future of all South. ern California. Sincerely yours,. Paul C. Janes City Clerk PCJEDMtr En . 'des. #1945 :- April 10, 1964 honorable Clair Engle Senate Office Building Washington 25, D.C. Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meetingg held April 6, 1964 passed and adopted Resolution No, 1945, apposing the Modi. fied Pacific Southwest water Plan and supporting the position of the Metropolitan Water District of South- ern California. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1945 be forwarded to you and urges your support in opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest Water Plan In order to safeguard the water 'future of all South. ern California. Sincerely yours,. Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ.ED.tr Enc Res. #t945 COPY April 149 1964 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 1111 Sunset Boulevard Los Angelesq California. Attention Joseph Jensen Chairman Gentlemen: Thank you for your letter and Resolution urging the City of Huntington Beach to pass legislation supporting the Metro- politaii Water District in opposing Secretary of Interior Udallos Modified Pacific Southwest Plan.. The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April.60 19649 passed and adopted Reso- lution No. 1945,r opposing the Modified Pacific Southwest hater Plan -and supporting the position of the Metropolitan-Water District of Southern California. Sincerely yours' Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:EDntr 0 [F) Y ' 2 i 4k(XIVION OF . k: cuv _; . 6 t `f 8 ut o�'U ul ' rnls;4 Is dOpOhd6nt Upon t�m 14'ater delivoi. 9 � 11 12 a <g �a� � 1 . 'the �. 4� Vic 13 p 14 15 16 gt po � 6r .cif *1 1; o ' ' ' ' : t tl�3ie s�.: ; .�" the alto' of 18 5 `° . 4 19 i 20 21I 22, I ��� I A�&O.`�' '- b 01 u �� � �. + ' the 'lt ' 24r:� 25 r : or 26 It'8 ' t .. ., '-; a 27 ° l i i 30 i i i Res. No. 2 3 4 � 5 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 7 CITY OF I-IUNTING"MN BEACH ) 8 9 1, PAUL C JONE , the duly elected, qualified and 4 10 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntin ton Beach, and ex-officio 11 Clerk of the City Council of said. City, do hereby certify that the, 12 ` hole. Dauber of members of the City Council of the City of 13 Huntington Beach i fire; that the foregoing resolution was passed 14 and adopted by the affirmative vote of.more than a ajor ty of all 15 the members of said City Cduncil.at a regular meeting thereof held 16 o the Gbh day of -24M31 1964, py the following voter 17 AYES: Councilmen. t' 18 Gislor, Stewart, <W7elch4 Lanbert 19 NOES: Councilmen: 20 Nay f 21 . ABSENT: Counciln;en 22 23 24 0.1 25 City Clerk and ex-bfficio Clerk of the City Council of 26 the Cite of Huntington Beach, California 27 28 29 30 WO sb THE METROA"EJLI`TANr W 'ER DISTRICT OF ©LJTHFsRN ALIFQRNIA SUNSET 641VARD; LOS ANGELES, CALIFQRNIA MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES 54. CALIF. OFFICE OF PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER AND CHIEF ENGINEER JUL 2 4 1964 AREA CODE 213 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach City Hall - 5th & Orange P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir : It is important that the Metropolitan Water District maintain a complete and up-to-date list of the elective and appointive officers of the more than 100 cities within the District. We would, therefore, be grateful if you would fill in the attached form and return it to us at your earliest conven- ience. A self-addressed stamped envelope for return of the form is enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, f Ala f J, Williams Director of Public Relations Encl. 2 "?/ $� THE METR0N11TA_N x"(A%, Q VR DISTRICT OFT IA�L SUNSET B ULEVAIt1 ij LOS N.,A GELES, CAI IYO NIA MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES 54, CALIF. OFFICE OF PHONE 624.9261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS August 6, 1965 AREA CODE 213 Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: The introduction of bills in Congress earlier this year bringing about an end to the controversy between California and Arizona over the Colorado River after nearly a half century of rivalry represented a mile- stone in the continuing development of the Pacific Southwest, the most dynamic region within the United States. Entitled the "Lower Colorado River Basin Project Act," this legislation was introduced in February by California's Senators Kuchel and Murphy, 34 California Congressmen and three Congressmen from Arizona. It provides for authorization of the Central Arizona Project, protection of existing California uses, and an intensive examination by the Secretary of Interior of possible supplemental sources of water for the entire Colorado River Basin. The Metropolitan Water District has vigorously supported this far- sighted legislation in the interests not only of Southern California but of the entire Pacific Southwest. We commend it to you as deserving of your wholehearted backing. Hearings are expected later this summer before the Sub-committee on Irrigation and Reclamation of the House Interior and Insular Affairs Committee. The most widespread public support of this legislation would be extremely helpful. Enclosed is a fact sheet relating to it which will serve to clarify its purposes for you. We are hopeful that your Honorable Body will see fit to adopt a resolution favoring the Lower Colorado River Basin Project Act. If a certified copy of such a resolution is sent to us, we will be happy to arrange for it to be introduced during the hearings. Respectfully yours, Enclosure J sep Je e , Chairman FACT SHEET ON LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN PROJECT ACT Objectives of the Lower Colorado River Basin Project Act are to provide a program for the further comprehensive development of the water resources of the Lower Colorado River Basin and to provide for additional water supplies for use in both the Upper and Lower Basins. The resulting regional plan is to serve as a framework under which projects may be authorized and coordinated to firm up the water supplies of this entire region. In order to implement these objectives, the following specific programs are to be undertaken: The Secretary of Interior is directed to examine current and long-range water supply and demand within the Colorado River Basin and to search for basins having a surplus of water which could be transported to supplement the inadequate Colorado River supplies. This investigation is to be completed within three years and is to provide for importation of at least 21-2 million acre-feet of water per year. Immediate construction of the Central Arizona Project is to be undertaken to meet critical requirements in the Phoenix and Tucson areas and surrounding agricultural lands. In addition, programs are to be undertaken within the Lower Basin for the protection of the tremendous recreational potential and fish and wildlife needs. The additional water supply to be developed will also increase recreational values of the entire Colorado River Basin. The creation of such lakes as Powell, Mead, Mojave and Havasu has already been of tremendous benefit to recreation. Protection is to be afforded all existing projects in the Lower Basin now diverting water from the Colorado River including those California uses up to 4.4 million acre-feet per year. Under the Supreme Court decree in Arizona vs. California, it is provided that California is entitled to the beneficial consumptive use of 4<4 million acre-feet in any year in which the total available in the mainstream of the river for such use in the states of Arizona, California and Nevada amounts to 7< 5 million acre- feet. A regional water commission shall be appointed consist- ing of Federal, State and local officials to coordinate and make recommendations concerning the proper utilization of Colorado River waters and necessary projects to augment these supplies. A basin fund will be created as ,the financial and accounting vehicle receiving the revenues from the sale of water and power and from other sources and reimbursing the Federal Treasury for its expenditures pursuant to reclamation law, # # tt THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA _ Post Office Box 54153v LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 < t r } Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 0 i August 13, 1965 Metropolitan Water District 1111 Sunset Boulevard Los Angeles, California Attention: Mr. Joseph Jensen, Chairman Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, at their regular meeting held on the fifth day of April 1965, adopted a resolution endorsing United States Senate Bill 1019 and companion bills and supporting the principles thereof. We are transmitting herewith a certified copy of Resolution No. 2148 for your consideration and trust that this will extend the support which you request. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:sg Enc: 1 THE METRO lLIT '1` �W 'E R DISTRICT OF Ai7, 'HEItN AIRNIA 11 SET.,, 14VA(RD LOS ANGEI:ES, CALIYORNIA Y4 1 MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 OFFICE OF PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER January 27, 1966 AREA CODE 213 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir : It is important that the Metropolitan Water District maintain a complete and up-to-date list of the elective and appointive officers of -the more than 100 cities within the District. We would, therefore, be grateful if you would fill in the attached form and return it to us at your earliest conven- ience. A self-addressed stamped envelope for return of the form is enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Ala fJ. Williams Director of Public Relations Encl. 2 THE ER DISTRICT OF{$®UTHfiRT A-IFOANIA 1 1'SUNSET B iJLEVARU; LOS :A'A LES, CALIFO�iZNIA 1 yf¢�'''.��C 2 ��•�„„�,�°,a,a ham.., d4✓ly'`'�'s nc.3't�"A: °�a°/"vti MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 OFFICE OF PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER AREA CODE 213 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk MAR 4 1966 City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones ; Boundary Changes Receipt is acknowledged of your certificate dated November 19, 1965, regarding changes in the boundaries of the City of Huntington Beach which occurred since November 23, 1964. This information completes our records in respect to the boundaries of your City as of November 19, 1965. For purposes of the required statement of change of boundaries of our District and map which we filed with the Orange County Assessor on December 30, 1965, and with the State Board of Equalization on January 3, 19665 it was assumed that no change in the boundaries of your City occurred between November 19, 1965 and December 31, 1965. If any such change did occur, or if any changes should occur in the future, please continue to notify us at your earliest convenience and furnish the requisite documents and maps . We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundaries of your City. Very truly yours, R. A.' Skinner General Manager B Y A: L. Hovanec Right of Way Agent cc-Orange County Municipal Water District (2) V THE MFTROILITA X, ,,,"-F-R DISTRICT jod OF�1 9©l1TRIsRN Al� tt�It1VIA � x x "SUNSET th�va��d;' LOS AAIGELES, CALIaII NIA r0 0 ,r ` •/ f MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES 54, CALIF. OFFICE OF PHONE 624.9261 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AREA CODE 213 June 28, 1966 The Honorable City Council City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Gentlemen: The Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District was, of course, extremely gratified by and apprecia- tive of the overwhelming approval the voters gave our $850 million bond issue on June 7. On behalf of the Board, may I express our deep thanks for your support of this most significant ballot measure. May I also promise you that we shall continue to exert our best efforts toward meeting the always increasing water needs of the Southern California coastal plain. .. Yours very truly, Joeph J n n '' Chair A4 w � S THE METR01 'LITA1 IW1ER DISTRICT OF Qb',E)KN ` NIA SLJ1fi5ET B� IVIb ' LOSL A1T\'GE"IES, CAI IO2NIA "S- MAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 OFFICE OF PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER AREA CODE 213 January 16, 1967 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Sir: It is important that the Metropolitan Water District maintain a complete and up-to-date list of the elective and appointive officers of the more than 100 cities within the District. We would, therefore, be ,grateful if you would fill in the attached form and return it to us at your earliest conven- ience. A self-addressed stamped envelope for return of the form is enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Alan�'J. Williams Director f Public Relations Encl. 2 � c THE METRO `LI-TTA7Nr,W 'ER DISTRICT OFf @T1 T{TFIB NIA �' d' 'SL3I SET B LTUVS ARP" LOSANGEI.ES, CALI QRNIA \��vP, WOWMAILING ADDRESS POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 OFFICE OF PHONE 626-4282 GENERAL MANAGER AREA CODE 213 Mr. Paul C. -Jones City Clerk JAN 2 7 City of Huntington Beach Civic Center P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones : Boundary Changes Receipt is acknowledged of your certificate dated November 21, 1966 , regarding changes in the boundaries of the City of Huntington Beach which occurred since November 19, 1965 . This information completes our records in respect to the boundaries of your City as of November 21, 1966 . For purposes of the required statement of change of boundaries of our District and map which we filed with the Orange County Assessor on December 29, 1966 and with the State Board of Equalization on January 3, 1967 , it was assumed that no change in the boundaries of your City occurred between November 21, 1966 and December 31, 1966 . If any such change did occur, or if any changes should occur in the future, please continue to notify us at your earliest convenience and furnish the requisite documents and maps . We appreciate your cooperation in keeping our office informed regarding the boundaries of your City. Very truly yours, R. . A. Skinner General Manager By 1/11z -1- � A. L. Hovanec Right of Way Agent cc-Orange County Municipal Water District (2) . THE M>rTROAOLITAN,..WA 'ER DISTRICT OF'SOUTHERN;- ALIFpRNIA �1 Ll l`SUNSET B ULEVARU,' ` LOS,.,'A1hTGELES,' CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS �'"'J ✓�''` POST OFFICE BOX 54153 LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90054 OFFICE OF a PHONE 624-9261 GENERAL MANAGER AREA CODE 213 - July 8, . 1968 City Clerk City of Huntington, Beach P.O. Box 190 t 'Hunti-ngton Beach, California 92648 Dear Sire It is important that the Metropolitan Water District maintain a complete and up-to-date list of the elective and appointive officers of the more than 100 cities within the District. We would, therefore,' be grateful if you would fill in the attached form and return it to us at your earliest conven- ience. A self-addressed stamped envelope for return of the form is enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Ala J. Williams Director of Public Relations Encl. 2 77 -70 70, _ 7 2 -- City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 4264e 1 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK r . i r October 3, 1973 I i F i, Orange County Planning Commission 'r 400 Civic Center Drive, Room 151 I. Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: 4. �`. The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting . ( held Monday, October 1, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 3771' f. supporting the endorsement by the Orange County Planning Com- mission of the proposal that 'the Metropolitan Water District make water available at reduced rate for the irrigation of greenbelts and permanent open space. We are enclosing a certified copy* of said Resolution for your information. Sincerely, ��At�tw� Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMWtpj Encl. ` d I i t' 1 l � J•`# ''- City of Huntington Beach • P.O. BOX 180 CALIFORNIA 92648 �: t ,, � •-,_ � OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC 't i" i t; i i G October 3, 19,73 f Board of Supervisors County of Orange P. 0. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: I The .City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, October 1, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 3771 jsupporting the endorsement by the Orange County Planning Com- :mission of the proposal that the Metropolitan Water District make water available at reduced rate for the irrigation, of_ greenbelts and permanent open space. 'r We are enclosing a certified copy of said Resolution for your i information. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:pj Encl. b I City of Huntington Beau P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i October 3, 1973 i Metropolitan Water District P. 0. Box 54153 Los Angeles, CA 90054 Gentlemen: r The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, October 1, 1973; adopted Resolution No. 3771 supporting the endorsement by the Orange County Planning Com- mission of the proposal that the Metropolitan Water District make water available at reduced rate for the irrigation of greenbelts and permanent open space. We are enclosing a certified copy of said Resolution for your information. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City, Clerk AMW:pj Encl. J City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 J T : OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 3, 1973 Santa Ana River & Santiago Creek Greenbelt Committee 625 N. Ross Room 8-169 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Gentlemen: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, October 1, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 3771 supporting the endorsement by the Orange County Planning Com- mission of the proposal that the Metropolitan I-later District make water available at reduced rate for the irrigation. of greenbelts and permanent open space. We are enclosing a certified copy of said Resolution for your G`. information. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk s AMW•P.] Encl. 5 f ' July 18, 1972 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 1111 Sunset Boulevard Los Angeles, California Attention: Joseph Sensen, Chairman Board of Directors Dear Sir: The City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting Dheld Monday, July 17, 1972, adopted Resolution No. 3534 urting the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to make every effort to r prevent the increasing cost of water. Enclosed is a certified copy of said resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw CC: Winston Updegraff Orange County League of California Cities i i OQO�`A AN W - P F f, y O ��HERN cn�>F��2 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Office of Board of Directors August 22, 1972 i Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Jones: Thank you for sending our District a copy of Resolution 3534, recently adopted by the Huntington Beach City Council, regarding the cost of Metropolitan water. This resolution has been brought to the attention of our Water Problems Committee and Board of Directors as they consider water pricing matters. - Very truly yours, r--e 7� Norton L. Norris Executive Secretary 1111 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles,Calif./Mailing address: Box 54153,Los Angeles,Calif.90054/Telephone: (213)626-4282 i o`�nn Vi-ArFR oa a ^� a y r o G ��z ,"'I C N" The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Office of the General Manager OCT 16 1973 Ms . Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Ms . Wentworth: This acknowledges receipt of your letter dated October 3, 1973, transmitting a copy of Resolution 3771 of the City Council of Huntington Beach supporting the endorsement by the Orange County Planning Commission of a proposal that the Metropolitan Water District make water available at reduced rates for the irrigation of greenbelts and. permanent open space. The Water Problems Committee of the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District considered the matter of adopting a special reduced rate for water used for environmental purposes at its meeting on August 14, 1973, and. decided. not to adopt such a special rate. The factors considered by the Committee in connection with this action were as follows . A number of proposals have been presented, to the District by various groups and agencies for the use of water for environmental purposes . These proposals have involved furnishing water for a variety of uses, including for greenbelts , parks , golf courses, freeway land- scaping, for lawns and gardens that are associated with condominiums and apartment complexes , and for other similar uses. The argument advanced in support of a special low rate for water so used, is that the provision of such green areas enhances the environment, and, that the general public should pay some or all of the cost of the water used for that purpose, rather than the person or agency who is the immediate user of the water. a h 10 1111 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles,Calif./Mailing address: Box 54153, Los Angeles,Calif.90054/Telephone: (213)626-4282 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Ms . Alicia M. Wentworth 2. OCT 16 1973 The question of establishing a low rate for any type of water service involves the justification for a subsidy by other water users and. taxpayers . The low rate established by the District for water sold for agricultural purposes is justified, on the basis that the water is surplus to the District's needs for water for domestic and, municipal purposes , and that the agricultural economy of Southern California is of such importance to the area as a whole that it is in the public interest to help maintain the viability of that segment of the economy. In addition, such agricultural uses improve the environment by provid- ing greenbelts and, open spaces. The low rate established, for water sold. for groundwater replenishment is also justified. on the basis that it is surplus water, and that the storage of such water underground reduces the need to build expensive surface storage and distribution facilities with the attendant evaporation of water, and investment of District capital in stored water and physical facilities . This reserve supply of water is of importance in preserving groundwater basins in the face of continuing extractions for a variety of purposes , including the preservation of the landscape. The indicated. cost savings , and the assurance of a dependable and, adequate water supply, are of benefit to the District' s taxpayers and water users as a whole. In the case of water used for environmental purposes , a similar broad public need, and, benefit would. have to be identified.. For many of the types of environmental uses which have been suggested, such as for parks, freeway landscaping , etc. , the property is owned by public agencies , including cities , special districts , counties, or the State. Property owned by such agencies is exempt from taxation by the District, so that in effect such property presently receives a subsidy from the District. Therefore, to provide a low rate for water used, by public agencies for environmental purposes would constitute a double subsidy. The suggestion made by some regarding the environmental use of water for lawns and gardens associated, with condominiums and apart- ment complexes would be a use of water on private property, primarily for the benefit of the residents. In general, the amount of lawn and, garden per apartment is no more than the amount of lawn and garden associated, with single-family homes . To establish a special low rate for water used, for one class of dwelling but not another could be The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Ms . Alicia M. Wentworth 3. OCT 16 1973 construed as unlawful discrimination, with the possible result that owners of single-family homes might also demand a low rate for water used, for lawns and gardens. Thus , this type of situation could, possibly lead to requests by almost all water users for a subsidy, which could, lead to the obvious question of who would, be left to pay the District' s expenses. In addition to the above difficulties , the establishment of a low rate for water used for environmental purposes would, tend. to benefit those who are most able to pay on an unsubsidized basis , since most of the new installations involving greenbelts, golf courses, and, other similar areas are located in outlying generally economically advantaged. suburban areas, whereas one of the critical social problems in Southern California is to provide additional parks and green areas in the congested older urban areas, and particularly in economically disadvantaged areas. Furthermore, establishment of a low water rate would tend to encourage the use of water for environmental purposes, thereby increasing the total demand for water to be supplied by the District, increasing the summer peak load on the distribution system, and increasing the District' s costs. Also, a low rate could tend to encourage use of a type of landscaping which would require a heavy use of water, rather than a type which would, require a lesser use. A low rate for water used for environmental purposes would also have an effect on water resource development beyond its effect on the District. One of the alternatives which is being examined, by many agencies is the reuse of reclaimed wastewater for selected, appli- cations , including environmental uses of the types under consideration here. If the District were to set a low rate for such uses , this would. reduce the economic incentive for local agencies to proceed with waste- water reclamation and reuse projects which were otherwise desirable. The District' s Board, has previously indicated its support for the concept of the use of reclaimed wastewater where appropriate. Another matter that is of particular importance relates to the District' s legal powers to set a special low rate for water used for environmental purposes . Under the MWD Act, the District' s basic purpose is to provide water for domestic and municipal purposes , and, it must The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Ms. Alicia M. Wentworth 4. OCT 16 1973 i charge uniform rates for like classes of service throughout the District, except that separate rates may be charged for water obtained, from different sources . Under this authority, the District consistently has charged, a single rate for Colorado River water used for domestic and municipal purposes, and recently has added, a different single rate for State project water used for such,�purposes. The use of water for environmental purposes on parks , lawns and, gardens , etc. , is a type of service which has been provided for many years by all communities and. is accepted as a normal aspect of the use of water for domestic and municipal purposes . To set a low rate for water used, for one segment of domestic and municipal service possibly would. require an amendment of the MWD Act to authorize the District to fix different rates for water used for different domestic and municipal purposes . Even assum- ing the present or ultimate legality of such different rates , it is apparent that the problems that would arise in administering such a dual rate structure and, in verifying the various water uses would be extremely complex. In view of the difficulties discussed above, the District' s Water Problems Committee concluded that there was not sufficient justi- fication for a subsidy being provided for water used for environmental purposes, and that no special low rate should be established for water used, for such purposes. It should be mentioned that while it was decided not to set a special low rate for water used for environmental purposes , there is full recognition by the District that providing water for such uses is desirable in improving the quality of life in Southern California. Your interest in this objective is recognized and appreciated, and we wish to thank you for your suggestions in this matter. Very truly yours , 4�z";0 1),;4", &_X1 , Frank M. Clinton General Manager DCB/chw t i—"aQ t—1 L�� fi ♦T N%VA WS 1 THE MET'R p °�D1STRI ,,T Fag S'fJ" T H E RIMF �� "RN IAA s, ^A o a 7111 SUNSET BQULEVARD ksi LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA Boyd H W�essrna'n borne 21,3%792b52,1 � for further mfocrimation please call 213 6/62 4282. Je"rry McLin home;213 �1'474 °' p IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Metropolitan Water District Board of Directors today (10/14/75) passed a resolution opposing the nuclear initiative on the June, 1976, statewide ballot. The board said the initiative, if passed by the voters and found to be legally enforceable, could have enormous adverse I effects on the availability of energy to pump water needed within the District ' s 4900-square-mile service area. Both MWD ' s Colorado River Aqueduct and the California Aqueduct of the State Water Project, which provide supplemental water to 102 million people of Southern California, require power purchases from the electric utilities. " It will be absolutely essential, " the resolution said, "that uranium reserves and the coal supply -of the West both be used to meet the growing requirements for energy and to replace use of oil and gas production to generate electricity. "The use of nuclear fuel can help reduce the burden of i importing from foreign nations vast amounts of low-sulfur oil for ' power plants which could ultimately lead to even more inflation and serious financial consequences for this country." I John H. Lauten, MWD general manager, said the initiative would i virtually ban the construction of new nuclear power plants in I i California that must be in operation within the next few decades . It could also cause severe cutbacks in use of existing nuclear plants . more. . . . . . . . . . ' �� �t w -2- "Even with extensive energy conservation and the reduced growth rate in use of electrical energy that is occurring, " Lauten said, "we will still have to have nuclear plants to meet our needs . " In a letter to the board, he further stated: "Future sources of power to operate the pumps on the state project have been under study for several years. The studies indicate that, while it is possible that energy derived from the sun, wind and geothermal sources may meet some of the needs , most of the additional energy will have to be supplied from coal-fired and nuclear plants." He said there are limited supplies of coal in California and, for the most part, it cannot be used in this region because of air pollution problems . Lauten pointed out that the energy needs on the state project, which includes a 2000-foot-high boost of water over the I Tehachapi Mountains into Southern California, will grow sharply as water demand continues to grow. "Even after developing all the power recovery potential of the project, " he said, "the state will need about 600 to 1000 megawatts of additional capacity in the future. " It ' s now estimated that in 1985, " Lauten added, "the state will utilize approximately 5 .5 billion kilowatthours of purchased energy--equivalent to 8.5 million barrels of oil." MWD' s Colorado River Aqueduct last year used the equivalent of 4.8 million barrels , with most of the power coming from Hoover and Parker dams. The aqueduct is not expected to need larger amounts of power for future operations but will remain a big energy user. MWD' s 27 member agencies in the six counties served by the District were urged to pass similar resolutions opposing the nuclear initiative. The counties are Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura. ,l # # # 10/14/75 4 2 3 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 4 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5 January 25, 1978 6 On motion of Supervisor Schmit, duly seconded and carried, the 7 following Resolution was adopted: 8 WHEREAS, the proposed dissolution of the Talbert Water District 9 of Orange County came on for hearing on this date after due notice as 10 provided by law; and 11 WHEREAS, this Board did hear and consider all oral and written 12 �Iprotests; and 13 WHEREAS, said hearing has now been closed; 14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Board does hereby find J> W F o i ; 15 that there has been a nonuser of the corporate powers of the Talbert � o W 0 u LL; W 16 Water District of Orange County, as specified in Section 56174 of the Gov- 0Za 00 17 ernment Code, and further finds that there is a reasonable probability 18 that said nonuser will continue in the future . 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board does hereby find that 20 the proposed dissolution of the aforesaid District will be for the inter- 21 ests of the landowners and the present and future inhabitants within said 22 District. 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board does hereby find that the 24 board of directors of the District has by unanimous resolution consented 25 to the dissolution. 26 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Board does hereby order dissolution N N k 27 of the Talbert Water District of Orange County without election subject to ® 28 the following terms and conditions : esolution No. 78-119 1. Dissolution of the dDW:dk Talbert Water District . r � 1 1. The City of Huntington Beach is designated as successor 2 to the Talbert Water District for the purpose of winding-up 3 and concluding the affairs of the District; 4 2. Any funds on hand after the conclusion of the affairs of 5 the District' s and the paying of any of its outstanding 6 debts shall be turned over to the City of Huntington Beach; 7 3. The Board of Directors shall be personally exonerated from 8 any further responsibility or liability with regard to the 9 District and its former affairs, assets and operations . 10 4 . The effective date of the dissolution shall be the date that 11 the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission 12 files the Certificate of Completion of the dissolution with i 13 the Secretary of State. 14 5. In all other respects not otherwise expressly provided for J> , ,z 15 herein, said dissolution shall be conducted in accord With LL 16 the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 9, Part 5, Division 1 Z C)Z o� 17 of Title 6 of the Government Code commencing at Section 56500 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 YES: SUPERVISORS LAURENCE J. SCHMIT, PHILIP L. ANTHONY, RALPH A. 2 26 DIEDRICH, RALPH B. CLARK, AND THOMAS F. RILEY N N 0 27NOES: SUPERVISORS . NONE ® 28 BSEt4T: SUPERVISORS NONE 2 . I STATE OF• CALIFORNIA ) ss 2 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 3 I, JUNE ALEXANDER, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange 4 County, California, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution 5 Iwas duly and regularly adopted by the said Board at a regular meeting 6 thereof held on the 25thday of January , 1978 and passed 7 by a unanimous vote of said Board , 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my:,,land and seal this 9 25th day of January 19 78. 10 /n =" JU_NE A EXANDER=- 12 Clerk of t-the Board of Supervisors of Oran4e'`•County, Ca-lifornia 13 : 14 J , W F 0z ; 15 O WOV "" 16> W U. O 4~ 2 O Z d 00 17 U 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 r 27 N N 28 O LL ® 3. �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK San Franc*sco, Cali-fornia Jvme 28) 1963 To: City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Street Address _cj_ty Hqi�- —,—H-urt-jagLo,n—B—e p c,,-fAj�-r_n i a Re- Sales Notices of All Bonds Mailing List. Would you 1-Andly check, your mailing, list- and ma'L�e certain the following company name is included* William R. Staats & Co. Municipal Bond Department 221 Montgomery Street San Francisco 4., California (Note) The above is a change of address. Former address ems 111 Sutter Street, San Francisco 4. Please also add: William R. Staat-s & Co. Municipal Bond Department 640 South Spring Street Los,-Angeles_14 California Please delete the name of Hooker & Fay, Inc. As of March 1 1963, William R. Staats & Co. merged �rlth Hooker & Fay, Inc.,. and the name of William R. Staats & Co. -fas retained. Allen B. Beaumont, Manage r Municipal Bond Department San Francisco Office �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OVERSIZED DOCUMENT ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK ARION J'OHN G. HEIMERDINGER HITED WALTER, WOODY & HEIMERDINGER TELEPHONE MAIN 1.5071 JOHN N. FUERBACHER MUNICIPAL BONDS " JOHN M. HEIMERDINGER ALBERT C. WIDMANN' 403 DIXIE TERMINAL BUILDING JOHN E. FR'OEHLICH CARL A. MUETHING CINCINNATI 2. OHIO August 22, 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Miller: SUBJECT: $3,7S0,000 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Water Revenue Bonds which are to be sold October 2nd. Kindly give us on the reverse side of this sheet, details covering the above described bond issue. We are interested in negotiating for purchase of these bonds. If negotiations are in order, when could our representative meet with, your governing body to submit a proposal -for these securities? Wherever we purchase municipals, we handle all details incident to their issuance through our bond attorneys and various departments without charge to the issuing municipality if the municipality so desires. Thanking you for complete information covering your bonds and for your reply to the above, with very best respects, we are Very truly yours, WALTE/RR,, WOODY && HEIMERDINGER JGH:KLC 4 Walter, Woody & Heimerdinger MUNICIPAL BONDS STATEMENT OF BONDS 403 Dixie Terminal Cincinnati 2, Ohio Name of issuing County, Municipality or District Amount of bonds authorized $................................................Amount to be sold $------------.------------ What day will officials meet to negotiate sale of bonds? ...................................... Amount of good faith deposit required (if any)? $--------------------------- --------- In what year or years do bonds mature and become payable? ....... If bonds mature serially,.how many mature in each-year? If bonds contain optional right of redemption, state year'thereof What rate of interest do bonds bear? Is interest payable annually or semi-annually? At what place are principal and interest of bonds.payable? For what purpose or purposes are bonds being issued .................-------.--------------._.- ----......----------------- In what denomination are bonds to be issued? _______________ When are bonds to be dated? FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF ISSUING COUNTY, MUNCIPALITY OR DISTRICT Real value of taxable property, estimated $---------------------------__ Assessed valuation as last equalized for taxation $------------------------------ Give estimate of the amount of the next year's assessed valuation $......•--------.........---------------- --------- -------- Give amount total bonded indebtedness, including bonds now to be issued $--------------------------------------------------------------------- Is there any floating or unfunded debt, in addition to bonded debt? $.......................................... What amount of Waterworks bonds are included in total bonded debt? $------------_--------------- _______________________________________ g What amount of Electric Light bonds are included in total bonded debt? $----------------------- What amount of Special Assessment Bonds payable solely from taxes levied against the property improved are included in total bonded debt as above? $--------------------_-------- What amount of Sinking Fund is now held for debt redemption (if any)? $-----------------------------, Give present estimated population of issuing County, Municipality or District If bonds are being issued by a District give ntunber,of acres contained therein .............. If bonds are being issued by a District give average value of land per acre $---------------------------- If bonds are being issued by a District, state what Towns and Cities are located therein also Railroads crossing or traversing District A - Were these bonds voted?................-.................................If so, how many votes for'issue....:.......-.-•----._._._._ against.ainst_:_-.-..._..-_.:...-.--..... In case bonds voted, if possible attach hereto printed copy of notice or proclamation of election Under what law are bonds to be issued?Give year of passage •chapter and section __...................__________________________._-__..:- I Are any other issues of bonds in contemplation or authorized? ........................-............................----------------- If so, please give amounts, purpose of issue and probable time of issuance .........................._____-----------------__---_________________ Has there been or is there any litigation pending or threatened affecting these bonds? ._..............................•_.-_---_______-.-__---_____.__.. Have any previous issue or issues of bonds been contested? ..........:.. Has there ever been any default in payment of principal or interest on any obligation? Give principal products and industries of issuing County, Municipality or District ---_..........................--...................................... . Are these bonds payable from unlimited ad valorem taxes? If not and they are payable from limited tax levy, what are the limited taxes.which may-be levied for their payment and must such limited tax be apportioned to payment of bonds and also.the operat7 ing expenses and,if so, what is the percentage which can be allocated to debt service? ----------_--•-------------------------•----------------.................................-------------•------••--•--- ----------- ............................--------........................ -._...•-._........................... Will you also please give us below the current tax levy, the current tax collections and also delinquent tax collections (if any), so we may compute the total current tax collections in your political subdivision and delinquent tax collections? -------------------.........-----------.............. .._.. ............ -----------•-----•----------------------- ...-----------------------------_-----........................................... - --- -- IF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED BONDS WHICH ARE TO BE SOLD ARE PAYABLE FROM EARNINGS OF A GIVEN PROJECT, PLEASE FURNISH IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: From what source are the project's facilities available? (For example, if waterworks, is the water purchased or is it obtained from wells, lake, river or watershed; if electric plant, is the energy purchased or generated; if gas plant,is the gas purchased or manufactured?) ------------------------------------------------------------------- ........................................ ..........-----------:-----------------------------------...--------------------••----.••----•-••----...-•------..-.. -----------••----------------------•---•---••................................................. ............................ •------------------------ ....................................................... ---....---........................... Has there ever been a shortage in the availability of facilities for sale to the consumers or does a shortage now exist?-:_----____.......................... ----•----------•------•-•-•................:....::..........................•--:......-----.-_..--•--------•-••---•-•-------------------`'---•----....------------•----------•--.-...-------...._...........----...._.._...--------------............................................. Is this a new project or an addition to existing properties?------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ................... Ifso, describe the proposed additions-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------— .......... If this is an addition to existing properties, what was gross revenue from this project for the last fiscal year?--------------------------------- ----------- ..................................................................................................... ---------......... ----------------------------------------------.................................................................. What was the maintenance and operating expense of this project for the last fiscal year?...........................................................---------------------------- Are there any other obligations outstanding which are a charge against the earnings of this project?............................................. ...................... If so, please describe the outstanding debts which are payable from the earnings of this project showing the amount thereof, interest rateand maturities of such debt......................................................... ---------------- --------------------------............................................----................. .................—---............................................................................ ----------------------=---------------------------•--.................----...............-------------- ................. If this is a new project, please arrange to give us estimated annual gross revenues and sources thereof;the estimated annual maintenance and operating expenses and the estimated net annual revenues available for payment of debt service and reserves and also send us copy of engineer's report on the project. —----—---------------------------------------------...............................--------- ......... ---------------------- --------------- ...................................................................... If you have any additional information on this bond issue, please give below: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SEAL OF ISSUING COUNTY, Signature ......................--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MUNICIPALITY OR DISTRICT Impress Here. Official Title—........................ ...........................-------------------- ............. ..............--.......... Datedat----------------------------------------------this--..... .-.day of--------............. --------. --.19...... �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OVERSIZED DOCUMENT ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK POHL & COMPANY, INC. INVESTMENT SECURITIES +. DIXIE TERMINAL BUILDING C I N C I N N A T I TELEPHONE 621-6514 September 20, 1963 MuN ciPAL BONDS �f Mr. Paul C. Jones, City Clerk City H..11 Huntington Beach, Cal. Re: $3,750,000 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Water Revenue bonds Selling: October 2, 1963 Dear Mr. Jones: Please forward, as soon as possible, an official Notice of Sale, Tax Statement, Financial Statement, Operating Statement, and any other information that you have available that will aid us in for- mulating a good bid for the above captioned bonds. Thanking you, we are Very truly yours, POHL & COMPANY, Inc. r' By: W.P.Conners W encls. r z 09WE THIS SIDE OF CARD IS FOR ADpRESS f £6E rt• j7��j2•��✓� £9,tz9n �� YCs an/ �CLG i r New York.2�..!�f� ,. �, Dear Sir: We would appreciate your sending us a copy of your latest financial statement and any other available information in connect'on with your coming bond sale. /e 3. ?i Li or)0 //tiil t,,�7/-)/1 Gl jo a( ze� 7/ � UUU If the material has already been mailed, please disregard this notice. Thank you for your courtesy. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 59 Wall Street New York 5, N. Y. Att: Bond Department B/D4.5C-7-62 t (119 S CHURCH R 18 ; ;'r3CNMI THIS SIDE OFCAR FOR A ZZESSjU.S.POSTAGE Paul C. Jones City Clerk Huntington Beach, California September 18, 1963 $3, 750, 000 Huntington Beach, California Please send one official statement to: WAINWRIGHT & RAMSEY INC. 70 Pine Street New York, New York 10005 } MARI JOHN G.HHEIMER INGERITED WA LTER, WOODY & HEIMERDINGER TELEPHONE YY/'� MAIN 1.8071 JOHN N. FUERBACHER MUNICIPAL BONDS - JOHN M. HEIMERDINGER ALBERT C. WIDMANN 403 DIXIE TERMINAL BUILDING JOHN E. FROEHLICH CARL A. MUETHING CINCINNATI 2. OHIO September 19, 1963 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California i Dear Mr. Jones SUBJECT: $3,750,000 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Water Revenue Bonds which are to be sold October 2nd Kindly give us on the reverse side of this sheet, details covering the above described bond issue. f We are interested in negotiating for purchase of these bonds. If negotiations are in order, when could our representative meet with your governing body to submit a proposal for these securities? Wherever we purchase municipals, we handle all details incident to their issuance through our bond attorneys and various departments without charge to the issuing municipality if the municipality so desires. Thanking you for complete information covering your bonds and for your reply to the above, with very best respects, i we are Very truly yours, WALTER, WOODY & HEIMERDINGER JGH:KLC Walter, Woody & Heimerdinger MUNICIPAL BONDS 403 Dixie Terminal STATEMENT OF BONDS Cincinnati 2, Ohio Name of issuing County, Municipality or District ----------------------------------------- Amount of bonds authorized $................................................Amount to be sold $....------------------------------------------ ------------------------ What day will officials meet to negotiate sale of bonds? Amount of good faith deposit required (if any)? $------------.------._-...-----------___-----__-_-_______. In what year or years do bonds mature and become payable? If bonds mature serially, how many mature in each year? If bonds contain optional right of redemption, state year thereof What rate of interest do bonds bear? Is interest payable annually or semi-annually? At what place are principal and interest of bonds payable? For what purpose or purposes are bonds being issued In what denomination are bonds to be issued? When are bonds to be dated? FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF ISSUING COUNTY, MUNCIPALITY OR DISTRICT Real value of taxable property, estimated $-----------------------------_---------_. Assessed valuation as last equalized for taxation $----------------------- Give estimate of the amount of the next year's assessed valuation $---------------------------------------. Give amount total bonded indebtedness,including bonds now to be issued $------------------.-------------------------------------------- Is there any floating or unfunded debt, in addition to bonded debt? $----------___-.._.---------------------------------------- What amount of Waterworks bonds are included in total bonded debt? $................._-.-..---.--.----..-...-..._..._..----_-_ What amount of Electric Light bonds are included in total bonded debt? $----------.---------__.-_-.--------------------------------------- What amount of Special Assessment Bonds payable solely from taxes levied against the property improved are included in total bonded debt as above? $................... What amount of Sinking Fund is now held for debt redemption (if any)? $--------------- Give present estimated population of issuing County, Municipality or District If bonds are being issued by a District give number of acres contained therein ------------------------- ------------------------------------------ If bonds are being issued by a District give average value of land per acre $----------------- ---------------------------------------------------- If bonds ai•e being issued by a District, state what Towns and Cities are located therein also Railroads crossing or traversing District _________________________________ � k i Is this a new project or an addition to existing properties?....................... ---------------.......--...............-----------------------------------------------------.....-----_--------------- Ifso, describe the proposed additions..........................--•-----------------------•----- -----------............-----...........-•---.....---•------•-----........------......------------.........--------- If this is an addition to existing properties, what was gross revenue from this project for the last fiscal year?........:------....................... •-••----•---...-----••-•................................•.........................................----------.........---........----------------•---•---•--•-----------.............................................................---------........... What was the maintenance and operating expense of this project for the last fiscal year?.................................................................................. Are there any other obligations outstanding which are a charge against the earnings of this project?-------------------------------------------------------------------.- If so, please describe the outstanding debts which are payable from the earnings of this project showing the amount thereof, interest rate and maturities of such debt............................ --------------... - - .....--..... f ...................•.- ................-................................................................----------;------------------ ----------------------................ ......................... .............................. If this is a new project, please arrange to give us estimated annual gross revenues and sources thereof; the estimated annual maintenance and operating expenses and the estimated net annual revenues available for payment of debt service-and reserves and also send us copy of engineer's report on the project. r If you have any additional information on this bond issue, please give below: f I I. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my lmowledge and belief. SEAL OF ISSUING COUNTY, Signature MUNICIPALITY OR- DISTRICT - -........- Impress Here. Official Title................. ---------------------------... Datedat..............................................this......... .----day of------------------.........................19........ NEW YORK DETROIT CHICAGO CLEVELAND BRAU N , BOSWORTH & CO. INCORPORATED MUNICIPAL BONDS TOLEDO TRUST BUILDING TOLEDO 4, OHIO September 18, 1963 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City Hall, Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: RE: $3,750,000 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA WATER REVENUE BONDS ( 2 issues ) Sale - October 2, 1963 We have information to the effect that the bonds re- ferred to in the caption hereof are being offered for sale on the above mentioned date. We would appreciate your sending to us a copy of any brochure that may have been prepared in connection with this sale. If no brochure has been prepared, please send us the following: 1. A copy of the bond sale notice. 2. A brief financial statement showing the most recent assessed valuation, total bonded debt, amount of sinking fund applicable thereto, and your estimate of the population. We are enclosing a self-addressed, stamped envelope for your convenience in this matter. Very truly yours, BRAUN, BOSWORTH & CO. BY F. W. JCergens FWJ:jjm Enclosure =mow a ®< Ik L.S.PCSIACE a AUG21'63 p 04 N Y } METER x Mr. Doyle Miller, City Administrator City Hall Huntington Beach, California STANDARD & POORS CORPORATION 345 H U DSON STREET NEW YORK 14, N. Y. IMPORTANT FOR BOND RATING P[TRPOSFS Please rush a copy of the official, Notice of Sale and WE currea& financial information prepared in connection with your forthcoming bond. offering. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. W. H. Tyler Municipal Bond Investments HORNBLOWER & WEEKS MEMBERS PRINCIPAL STOCK EXCHANGES ESTABLISHED Isla 100 CONSTITUTION PLAZA HARTFORD 3, CONN. OFFICES COAST TO COAST 249-9371 September 19, 1963 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones: Kindly send two official statements and any additional information you have concerning the proposed offering of $3,750M Huntington Beach, California, Water Revenue bonds selling October 2, 1963. Thank you in advance for your courtesy. Very truly yours, Barbara Bauer bb J. U.RAN & MOODY, INC. MUNICIPAL BONDS EXCLUSIVELY TELETYPE ST P 160 TELEPHONE CAPITAL 4-9661 SAINT PAUL 1, MINNESdTA 93 EAST SIXTH STREET SEPTEMBER 9, 1963 MR . DOYLE MILLER , CITY ADMINISTRATOR HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA DEAR MR . MILLER : RE : $3, 750,000 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA WATER REVENUE BONDS SELLING 10-2-63 WE UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE PLANNING TO OFFER AN ISSUE OF BONDS IN THE MARKET IN THE RELA- TIVELY NEAR FUTURE, SO THAT WE WILL BE IN A POSITION TO CONSIDER SUBMITTING A BID AT THE PROPER TIME , WE WOULD APPRECIATE RECEIVING A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE , FULL DETAILS OF THE PROJECT, AND A CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS SOON AS CONVENIENT* A STAMPED ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REPLY AND WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COURTESY* VERY TRULY YOURS , JURAN & MOODY, INC,,.-' DAMES I NGE, JEK:,AL ENCLOSURE HERBERT J. SIMS & CO., INC. ESTABLISHED 1935 52 WALL STREET NEW YORK 5, N. Y. WHITEHALL 4-4553 SEPTEMBER 4, 1963 MR. DOYLE MILLER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA RE: $3,750,000. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA WATER REVENUE BONDS SALE: 10/2/63 GENTLEMEN: WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR SENDING US THREE COPIES EACH OF THE NOTICE OF SALE,, OFFICIAL STATEMENT, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, ENGINEERING REPORT, BOND RESOLUTION, AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTINENT TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED FORTHCOMING SALE. VERY TRULY YOURS, HERBERT J. SIMS & CO., INC. RPA:LC J U RAN & MOODY, INC. MUNICIPAL BONDS EXCLUSIVELY TELETYPE ST P 160 TELEPHONE CAPITAL 4-9651 SAINT PAU L I, M 1 N N ES OTA 93 EAST SIXTH STREET AUGUST 29, I963 MR . DOYLE MILLER CITY ADMINISTRATOR HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA I DEAR MR . MILLER : WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IS CONTEMPLATING THE OFFERING OF $3,750,000 WATER REVENUE BONDS . WILL YOU BE KIND ENOUGH TO SEND US TWO COPIES OF THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT CONCERNING THIS OFFERING AS SOON AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE . THANKING YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND WITH BEST WISHES , WE ARE VERY TRULY YOURS , JU AN 8 MOODY ,I,N'� y AM Es E. KL ING L ice/ JEKSIB W. E. HUTTON & CO. FSTABLISIIFD 1886 August 23, la63 75 FEDERAL STREET BOSTO_N, MASS. Mr. Doyle :Miller, City Administrator City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: 3,750,000. Huntington Beach, 'Calif. Water Revenue Bonds selling 10/2/63 Dear Sir: Would you kindly add our name to your maiiing list, to receive three copies of official statements, bond ordinances or resolution, and engineers' reports on ,your proposed new issue. Very truly yours, W. E. HUTTON & CO. By: Dudley Hall DH:ev THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK �r 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza,New York 15,New York August .22, 190 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Miller: In connection with the offering of $3,750,000 revenue bonds on October 2, 1963, will you please send us the following data: (1) Notice of sale and summary of financial information prepared Ifor bidders and investors. (2) Bond resolution, ordinance or law authorizing these bonds. (3) Summary of engineering data respecting the project and a copy of your most recent annual financial report. If the above is consolidated into a prospect-as or brochure', that would, of course, satisfy our needs. Matters will be facilitated if you direct this material to the undersigned at: The Chase Manhattan Bank Municipal Portfolio Dept. - 26th Floor 1 Ghase Manhattan Plaza New York 15, New York We would also appreciate being placed on your mailing list to receive related information in the future. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, 1 J. 'Sullivan istant Treasurer E Q U I I A B L E NASHVILLE NEW YORK NEW ORLEANS BOSTON DALLAS HARTFORD Securities Corporation BIRMINUST N AHTLAN ELPHIA B IRMING HAM ATLANTA MEMPHIS AND JACKSON,MISS. GREENSBORO 322 UNION STREET - - NASHVILLE 3, TEN NESSEE August 22, 1963 i i Mayor City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: With reference to the $3,750,000 Water Revenue Bonds, selling October 3rd, please send us two copies of the prospectus. Thanking you for this information, we are Very truly yours, EQUITABLE SECURITIES CORPORATION Mrs. Frances Brown FB:fb CACHE & CO. Founded 1879 36 WALL STREET NEW Y ORK 5, N. Y. August 21, 1963. Mr. Doyle Miller, City Administrator, Huntington Beach, Cal. Dear Sir: Will you kindly senduus a copy of the official Notice of Sale covering the $3,750,000 Water Revenue Bonds to be sold on October 2nd, together with any other information you may have available relative to this issue. Thanking you, we are Yours very truly, BACHE & CO. mk m ( � �35 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET, CHICAGO 3, ILLINOIS Established 1895 Incorporated 1953 TELEPHONE FINANCIAL 6-2500 (Area Code 312 for Long Distance Dialing) OUR 65th YEAR August 21, 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: Re - $3,750,000 HUNTINGTON BEACHi CALIFORNIA Water Revenue Bonds Selling: October 2, 1963 We are interested in submitting a proposal for the purchase of the above issue of bonds* Would you kindly forward us, at the above address, the following informations 2 Copies -- Notice of Sale 2 Copies -- Prospectus or fi..umncial and economic information 2 Copies -- Engineering Report 2 Copies --Bond Ordinance .or Resolution and., in addition, please send one set of each of the, above to - John Nuveen & Co. John Nuveen & Co. Attentions J. David E;verard Attentions Guy Garland S Hanover Square 140 Federal Street, New Mork 4, N. Y. Boston :10, Mass. Thank,you for your prompt response to thin request. Yours very tr)aly, Underwriting Department. da CHICAGO TAX-EXEMPT PUBLIC BONDS . . . . SINCE 1898 NEW YORK ATLANTA BOSTON COLUMBUS DALLAS DETROIT LOS ANGELES OMAHA PHILADELPHIA SEATTLE ST. PAUL B. .J. VAN INGEN & CO. INC. MUNICIPAL BONDS MIAMI, FLORIDA 40 WALL STREET CHICAGO, ILL., BOSTON, MASS. NEW YORK 5, N. Y. August 21, 1963 Gentlemen: We expect to submit a bid on the proposed sale of $3, 750, 000 Huntington Beach, California Wtr. Rev. Bds. , selling Oct. 2, 1963. Please send us seven (7) copies of the following: 1 . Notice of Sale 2. Official Statement 3. Authorising Bond Ordinances or Resolutions 4. Engineering Report concerning the Project 5. Any Qther Information which may be pertinent Kindly check your mailing list for our name so that we may receive such information on all future bond issues. A. J. VAN TNGEN CO. Inc. By ...� VJh of V-i ent 6h, MEMBERS: New York Stock Exchange Midwest Stock Exchange American Stock Exchange (Associate) � CX 122 SOUTH LAS E STREET - CHICAGO 3 CO (AREA CODE 312) 341-3412 NEW YORK AND OTHER PRINCIPAL CITIES August 21, 1963 Mr. .Doyle Miller, City Administrator City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: Will you please send us, when available, two copies of the official Notice of Sale and Official Statement relating to the. $3, 750, 000 Water Revenue bonds being offered for sale on October 2nd. i Thank you. Very truly yours, A. C. ALLYN & CO. Municipal Dept. E. M. Wiedenhoft a w o w. WaN Sfi n E r .ax. T DO'4'1F JON�s �' COMPAI'�X. INS 44 BRUAC3 STREET F'UBL: ERS g a FINANCIAL ADVERTISING DEPARTMENT August 212 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Miller: Why does The Wall Street Journal publish the lion' s share of Municipal Bid invitations? The reasons: major underwriters, bankers, dealers, insurance companies and high-income individuals. . .each in itself is an extremely important market. These. important people depend on the Journal to furnish them with business and financial information, and your invitation for bid announcement surely is real news. What other publication reaches 'Wall Street' , and at the same time, assures you,of most thorough coverage among your other buying publics that create demand, hence keener competitive bidding. Economy is also yours; our six column page and special legal rate, in the Eastern Edition, make The Wall Street Journal a most attractive buy. Send your bid notice to us today. Use the attached form if you wish. It will receive our prompt attention. Cordially, William E. Miller Financial Advertising Dept. WEM:GP Enc. I PLEASE RETURN THIS ORDER TODAY! INSERTION ORDER FOR MUNICIPAL BIDS (Date) WALL STREET JOURNAL 44 BROAD STREET NEW YORK 4, N. Y. Dear Mr. Diekman: Please publish the bid notice of for times in the following edition(s): NATIONAL EASTERN MIDWEST PACIFIC COAST SOUTHWEST First insertion should be on other dates Please use columns for width, and depth as necessary. The copy to be used is attached. Kindly send bill to: Very truly yours, Signature & Title If you have any questions, please call HAnover 2-3115, collect. 70 PINE STREET NEW YORK 5,NEW YORK WHITEHALL 4-1212 MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC August 21,, 1963 Mr. Boyle Miller, City Administrator City Hall Huntington Beach' California Dear Sir: In connection with the proposed sale of the Huntington Beach,, California Bonds, selling in the amount of $3,,?50,,000, selling on October 2,, 1963, please foraiard to the attention of the undersigned full financial information, together with arty supplementary infor- ni-ition available, and about four (4) col)ies of the official notice of sale aiid bidding form. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, PIL•'RULL LYNICH, PIERCE) EE111AER & `)I1ITH INC. 4iss) Zita C. Millett Municipal Bond Department ZC11:and I T - HUTCHINSON, SHOCKEY & CO. 208 SOUTH LA SALLE STREET CHICAGO 4, ILLINOIS AN DOVER 3.3051 August 21, 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator-City Hall Huntington Beach, California RE: $3 ,750,000 WATER REVENUE BONDS Dear Mr. Miller: Would you please forward to us the Official Sale Notice and any other relevant material pertaining to the above bond sale, which is set for October 2, 1963 . Very truly yours, Anne V. Nowak t i VIA- August 21, 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller, City Administrator, City Hall, Huntington Beach, California. Dear Sir: In connection with the sale of $3,750,000 Huntington Beach, California Water Revenue bonds on October 2nd, would you kindly send us three copies of the official notice of sale, bid forms and complete current financial information. Thanking you, we are Yours very truly, I IMAN BROTHERS BY I ar ALLAN BLAIR & COMPANY 135 SOUTH LASALLE STREET• CHICAGO 3 ILLINOIS Telephone DEarborn 2-5610 - Teletype CG2429 August 19, 1963 City Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: $3,750,000 Huntington Beach, California (Orange County) Waterworks Revenue Bonds sell:i;ng October 2, 1963 Dear Sir: We are considering bidding on the above-described bonds, and we would appreciate receiving a copy of the Notice of Sale, together with such other information which has been prepared for the purpose of informing prospective purchasers of the bonds with information pertinent to the financial and economic background. Your courtesy in this matter would be very much appreciated. We would also like to have our name, as shown below, added to your permanent mailing list for information on future municipal financings.. Allan Blair & Company _ 135 South LaSalle Street Chicago 3, Illinois Yours very truly, ALLAN BLAIR & COMPANY 022M AN C ; s T' °%-2 (Miss) Arlene Piovosi =3 . 8, ` ,:g E 7 R I CITY OF K HUNTING i ON BEACH ALLAN ®LAIR & COMPANY 125 SOUTH LA SALL.E STREET • CHICAQO 9 ILLINOIS Telephone UEtarborn 2-5610 • Teletype CG2429 August 19, 1963 City Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: $3,750,000 Huntington Beach, California (Orange County) Waterworks Revenue Bonds selling October 2, 1963 Dear Sir: We are considering bidding on the above-described bonds, and we would appreciate receiving a copy of it-he Notice of Sale, together with such other information which has been prepared for the purpose of informing prospective purchasers of the bonds with information pertinent to the financial and economic background . Your courtesy in this matter would be very much appreciated. We would also like to have our name, as shown below, added to your permanent mailing list for information on future municipal financings. Allan Blair & Company 135 South LaSalle Street Chicago 3, Illinois Yours very truly, ALLAN BLAIR & COMPAN", { �' M, 40.1 /(Miss) Arlene J Boston New York Philadelphia MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. Pittsburgh INVESTMENT COUNSEL & CONSULTANTS Atlanta Chicago Washington San Francisco Los Angeles 99 Church Street • New York 7 COrtlandt 7-6800 August 21, 1963 Mr. Doyle Miller City Administrator Huntington Beach Huntington, Cry.. Dear Sir: i Re: $3,750,000 Water Bonds Selling October 2, 1963 In connection with our services to investors, we wish to obtain information which will permit us to report upon the investment attributes of this issue. Further, if the bonds qualify for a Moody rating, the information will also be used in rating analysis, As Moody's bond ratings are widely used as a guide by bond buyers, the publication of a rating prior to sale typically enhances -the marketing of bonds, and it is to your own advantage that the data be forwarded to us promptly. Our revenues are derived exclusively from services to investors. The only charge to the issuing body is the moral obligation to make a full disclosure of all pertinent information (the outline attached may omit some very germane point) and to keep us supplied with financial information in the future so that the rating may be kept current so long as the bonds are outstanding in ratable amount Please address all communications to my attention. Very truly yours, MOODY°S INVESTORS SERVICE9 INC. DME:dcf D o M. El:l.anwood Vice President INFORMATION FOR RATING ANALYSIS OF WATER REVENUE BONDS 1. A concise description of the water works supply, transmission, treatment, storage and distribution system as it presently exists. 2. A concise description of proposed improvements, together with estimates of the costs involved in any proposed construction, actual bids received for such construction and the face value of performance bonds required to accompany each bid. 3. Income and expense statements of the water works system for the ten latest completed fiscal years; if the most recently completed year is more than six months past, we should like also an interim earnings statement for the current year and a comparison with the same interim period a year earlier. 4. Balance sheets of the water works system as of the close of the three latest completed fiscal years; if the most re- cently completed year is more than six months away, we should like also a copy of the most recent interim balance sheet. 5. Schedules of water and sewer (if any) rates in force and effect from 1940 to date, with full detail regarding any changes in such schedules currently proposed. 6. A conformed copy of the ordinance or resolution authorizing and securing the proposed revenue bond issue. 7. In case the system furnishes water in large volume to indus- try, identify the large customers by name and nature of busi- ness, and furnish data regarding past and prospective volume sales to them and revenues derived therefrom. t+VU3? 0 CDV111 PD C NE.".r YORK NY 10 1126A EDT DOYLE MILLER z CITY ADMINISTRATOR HUNTINGTON REACH CALIF 0 z� PLEASE AIR PIA I L 1�,IPAED I ATELY 3 OFFICIAL NOT i CES OF SALE , �) BID FORMS, BOND ORDINANCE, F I vANC I AL STATEMENTS AND DATA Zo �4 14 RE. $3, 730, 000 . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA WATER W REVENUE BONDS SELLINC OCTOBER 2ND 79-63 uo PHELPS FENN AND CO 39 .BROAD,NJAY NEW YORK 6 NY AT T M I SS IMAR I LYN rViADDEN z 00-4 ' z �)-e�; 3 .$3,750, 000. 2 1 963 Z WW �N 937AM TOWN $END, DABNEV & TysON rdtn/to')ofirf 1,47 HCMp[p9 Of NEW YORK AND BOSTON STOCK EXCHANGES AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE ASSOCIATE 30 STATE STREET BOST'ON Dear Sire: Will you,please send us three copies of the Official Prospectus in connection with your forthcoming issue of $3,750,000 Huntington Beach, Calif. Water Rev. bonds. Al.so 'please send one copy to Mr. John Stearns, P.O. Box 696, Manchester, N.H. and one copy to Mr. Allan Martin, c/o Townsend, Dabney & Tyson, 37 Main Street, Keene, N.H. Thanking you very much, we are, Very truly yours, TOWNSEND, DABNEY & TYSON pg Municipal Department KALMAN & COMPANY, INC. MINNEAPOLIS SAINT PAUL M I N OT 501 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH M I NNE APO L I S 2, MINN. 23 September 1963 City Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Re: $3,750,000 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1963 Water Revenue Bonds Series "A" As we will be interested in bidding on the above designated bonds when they code up for sale on 2 October, we would appreciate your sending us three (3) prospectuses and Notice of Sale. 1 1 hank you very much for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, SALMAN & COMPANY, INC. Stanton Aby Vice President SA/mj I I 1 i I i I I 4 I September 11, 1963 i I r Stone & ` omigberg 1314 Russ Building n Francisco, California Attentions Mir. Ed Wells Deer Mr. Wells: le are enclosing the 600 prints of the Niot4ce Inviting Bids as requested by 0°MIelveny & Myers, under separate cover, Please notify us whether or not we are to forwares copies of this not-Ice to the prospective bidders that have written requests to his office. We have forwarded copies to ;your office as we received the setters. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Janes City Clerk o Fly ' LAW OFFICES OF O'M ELVENY be MYERS BEVERLY HILLS OFFICE 433 SOUTH SPRING STREET 9601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD BEVERLY HILLS LOS ANGELE 13 273-4111 620-1120 CABLE ADDRESS MOMS•• August 29thOUR FILE NUMBER l 9 6 3 B-5425 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER REVENUE BONDS, 1963 Mr. Paul C. Jones City 'Clerk City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones: We have today ordered from Jeffries Banknote Company twenty copies of the resolution of issuance for the above refer- enced bonds in legal form for your use in adopting said resolu- tion at the next regular meeting of September 3rd. The name of the fiscal agent will be left blank in said resolution since the selection will not have been made by the City by September 3rd according to Mr. Ed Wells of Stone & Youngberg. Mr. Wells has indicated that the City will make the selection of the fiscal agent by Friday, September 6th, so that the name of the, fiscal agent can be included in the Official Statement. Mr. Wells also desired the name of the fiscal agent to be included in the resolution of issuance that will be pre- pared in booklet form and sent out with the Official Statement . It will be necessary for me to notify Jeffries Banknote Company of the name of the fiscal agent on Friday, . September 6th, so that they can go ahead with the printing of the booklet form resolutions . Would you please call me on Friday and let me havelthis information. I should also be provided at the same time Vith the names of the Councilmen who were present and voted on the resolution, and the names of any absent Council- men, as well as the confirmation of the date the resolution was adopted - presumably September 3rd. Stone & Youngberg has indicated that they will require 600 copies of the resolution printed in booklet form on 8-1/2 Ifx li paper on both sides . Would you please advise me by Septem- ' ber 6th how many copies of the resolution. in booklet form the.- I __.dxs` r•.�.z. s,�srs,�r` .a.�.�.x.cross.a�abr»z .mwkeiww+:awA ".-` .,.�,,..,_ -, G • 6 #2 Mr. Paul C. Jones 8-�9-63 City would like. I will place an order with Jeffries Bank- note Company on September 6th for the number of copies of the resolution that the various persons will need. Yours very truly, O'MELVENY & MYRRS r F� By ��- - DRH:mt Donald R. Hodgman cc: Stone & Youngberg Mr. Ed Wells cc: Jeffries Banknote Company cc: Mr. Doyle Miller City .Administrative Officer i 1 BOSWORTH, SULLIVAN & COMPANY, ING. MEMBERS NEWYORK STOCK EXCHANGE 660 SEVENTEENTH STREET DEFVER 2,COLORADO September 23, 1963 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Jones: .May we be sent, as soon as possible, a prospectus on the proposed issue of 3,750,000 of Huntington Beach, California Water :Revenue Bonds. Thank you. Yours very truly, BOSWOR.TH, SULLIVAN & COMPANY, INC. 'V Charles H. Hunle y CHH:gs pONTq/ ��1� � -,III.• Z _ //'^- ��yGr - ^• �t�� - CITY HALL l/ N fV.Gpv J FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A� VIKING 7.3511 �I KIMBERLY 9-0361 May 29, 1963 / CITY COUNCIL � � . Jim KANNO, MAYOR JOSEPH CALLENS,, City Council VICE MAYOR ' City of Huntington Beach . HENRY BOER - FRED MOIOLA Huntington Beach, California DONALD WARDLOW ADMINISTRATOR-CLERK Dear Councilmen: EDWIN L. MCDONALD ATTORNEY CALVIN P.SCHMIDT It has been brought to the attention of the City of Fountain Valley of BUILDING DIRECTOR a report that has been submitted to the Board of Supervisors and a sub- DUANE EMMINGER sequent hearing that will be. held on June 12, 1963, at 11:00 A. M. in FINANCE the Board's Hearing Room, County Court House, Santa Ana, in regard to ROBERT E. SHOUSE the formation of-'a West Orange County Water District. PLANNING DIRECTOR -- \ STANLEY R. MANSFIELD PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR The boundaries of this proposed district encompass the area that is now THOMAS E.SHELTON being served by a group or_ groups that are now engaged in over-drafting PURCHASING AGENT the underground water reservoir. Said area is also on a flat rate and RUBIN DOBKIN does not meter its water usage. Under the program submitted in the TREASURER JOSEPH J. COURREGES Engineering Report, indications show that meters will be installed over a nine-year period, not immediately as requested by the various munici- palities of the County and the Public Utilities Commission. The City of Fountain Valley is quite concerned about any delayed action in the installation of water meters which help to conserve water. This is especially true when continued pumping and over-drafting of the under- ground basin for domestic use is being allowed within the County without supplementing same by off-site imported water. We must all join together to conserve this precious commodity for the lean years ahead of us, especially from approximately 1967 to 1972, or until the arrival of Feather River water to the Southern California area. I am enclosing a copy of a resolution the Council instructed the City Attorney and myself to prepare for the next Council meeting on June 3, 1963. Because of the time urgency, I am sending out copies of this resolution at this time so that your Honorable Body, if you deem it desirable, may let it be known to the Board of Supervisors in regard to future water conservation in Orange County.. REMEMBER$-WATER IS THE LIFE LINE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR ENTIRE COUNTY. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours truly, ELM:mc EDWIN L. McDONALD Enc. Administrator-Clerk cc: City Manager RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO CONSIDER THE ENTIRE COUNTY IN REGARD TO PRESENT AND FUTURE WATER SHORTAGES THAT WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST BY THE OVERDRAFTING OF THE UNDERGROUND WATER RESERVOIR THROUGH PUMPING FOR DOMESTIC USE. WHEREAS, the County of Orange is in a critical situation in regard to the overdrafting of the underground water reservoir; and WHEREAS, continued pumping of this underground water reservoir will and has accelerated salt water intrusion in the two major gap areas of the County; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Water Resources has investigated and is presently making a study of methods to stop the salt water intrusion which is now endangering the County of Orange; and WHEREAS, the Orange County Water District has spent considerable money in a replenishment program to replenish the underground program to carry Orange County through the lean years of 1967 - 1972; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley is quite cognizant of this critical condition and is concerned about the continued usage of the underground water reservoir for domestic usage without meter curtailment of same; and WHEREAS, analysis of water usage indicates that domestic water services now being metered utilize on a per capita basis 50% less water than those that are on a flat rate; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley and adjoining municipalities have entered into a program to alert the citizens of the County of Orange on how precious fresh water is to the entire County and the preservation of same; and 14HEREAS, the cost of importing and utilizing off-site water is costing the citizens of the County of Orange presently $29.00 per acre foot which is con- siderably more than the cost of $10.50 per acre foot for those who are utilizing only well water as a source of supply; and WHEREAS, the continued use of these pumping operations for domestic supply will endanger the availability of water for emergency use not only to Fountain Valley but all of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley adopted a Resolution Number 1081 on October 2, 1961, in concurrance with the Orange County Water District Resolution Number 143 adopted on July 7, 1954, appealing to the Public Utilities Commission to do all in its power to have water meters installed on all service connections immediately to aid in the conservation of water and avoid any waste of this precious commodity; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley and its citizens have felt it amoral obligation not only to the City but to the entire County area to utilize for domestic use off-site imported water rather than overdrafting the underground reservoir facility through pumping operations and have spent approximately $500,000 of a $1,500,000 project to bring off-site water to the City of Fountain Valley in lieu of pumping for domestic use; and WHEREAS, the City of Fountain Valley appeals to the Board of-Supervisors to consider all of Orange County in regard to any future actions which would jeopardize the County as a whole and would defer sound water conservation practices through the deferment of the installation of water meters on present flat rate consumers and would allow the continued pumping operation for domestic use. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley does hereby urge and request that the ,Bdard of Supervisors in the County of Orange consider the entire County of Orange in regard to any future develop- ments which would jeopardize the entire County through the continued non- conservative water usage practices. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this Resolution be forwarded to the City Councils within Orange County, the Orange County Water District, the Honorable Senator John A. Murdy, Jr. , Assemblymen William E. Danneymeyer, James E. Whetmore and Robert E. Badham, and that if the City Councils of these cities feel so moved to let their position known to the Board of Supervisors take immediate steps to do so in regard to this immediate problem. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Fountain Valley at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June, 1963. Mayor ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY ) I. EDWIN L. McDONALD, do hereby certify that I am the City Clerk of the City of Fountain Valley; that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced to said Council at its regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June, 1963, and was at said meeting regularly passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NAYES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: City Clerk -2- I CITY OF HUNT'INGT ON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT' Huntington Beach, California g �c�UNTY C� February 14, 1964 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: Attached is a letter from Talbert Water District that we should discuss at our next meeting. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler_ of Public Works JRW:a Attch. INC' City of Huntington Beach California out OApril 23, 1964 Orange County Water District 1629 West Seventeenth Street Santa Ana, California Attention: Howard Crooke Secretary Manager Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular rjeeting held April 20t 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 1955 endorsing Assembly Bill AB No. 17. Council directed that a copy of said Resolution be mailed to you and urges your support of Assembly Bill AD No. 17. Sincerely yours, Paul C# Jones City Clerk PCJ:tr Enc: Res. #1955 City of Huntington Beach California April 23, 1964 Honorable Assemblyman William 2. Dannemeyer State Capitol Sacramento, California Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held April 20, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 1955 endorsing Assembly Bill AB No. 17. Council directed that a copy of said es' .oution be mailed to you and urges your support of Assembly Bill AB No. 17. Sincerely yoursq Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:tr 1955 Enc: Iles. IN Colt unties Yton Beach H o California April 23, 1960 Honorable Senator John A. Murdy, Jr. State Capitol Sacramento, California Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of 'Iffuntington each at their regular meeting held April 20, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 1955 endorsing Assembly Bill AB No. 17o Council directed that a copy of said Resolution be mailed to you and urges your support of Assembly Bill AB No* 17. Sincerely yourst Paul C. Jones City ("lerk PCJ:tr Enc Res. ;#'1955 City of Huntington Q Cali f omis Honorable Assemblyman Robert E . Badha State Capitol Sacramento, California Sear Sir The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Aril 20, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 1955 endorsing Assembly Bill AB No6 17. Council directed that a copy of said Resolution be mailed to you and urges your support of Assembly Bill AB No. 17. Sincerely yours, Paul C. . Jones City Clerk PCJstr Enc z Res. W1955 y s City of Huntingtoneach o� Cali f omia OApril 23, 1964 Honorable Assemblyman James E. Whet ore State Capitol Sacramento, California Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting .held April 20, 19G4, passed and adoDted Resolution No. 1955 endorsing Assembly Bill AB Igo. 17. Council directed that a copy of said Resolution be mailed to you and urges your support of Assembly Bill AB No. 17. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clark PCJ:tr mac: :des. //19 5 s RESOLUTION No® 1955 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL; OF TEE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENDORSING A. B. 17 . WIEREAS, Assemblyman Carley V. Porter has introduced A. Be 170 in the current session of the California Legisla- ture, which bill embodies the principles regarding the Calif- ornia dater Fund and State Water Financing as presented to the Senate Fact Finding Committee on Natural Resources; and AREAS, A. Bo 17 has the endorsement of the Orange County Water District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Calilornia, that it endorses A. Bo 17 and urges the representatives of Orange County in the California Legislature to support this bill. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of April, 1964. a Mayor AT T ;eorg: D AS ORM: Cit erk Shibata Asst. City Attorney to Faso No. 1955 9 F STATE OF CALIFORNIA � County of Orange ) ss City of Huntington Beach ) 1, BAU1 Ca JONES, the duly elected, qualified and act- ing City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-of- ficio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby cer- tify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is fire, that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of April, 1964, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Gisler, Stewart, Welch, Lambert NOES: Councilman: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Wells CITY Clerk a ex-officto Clerk of the Cit; Council of t e City of Huntington Beach, California 1 -UNIL V�IAJHR ZIRIF POST OFFICE BOX 37 � TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA April 24, i 964 PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK Qrarige Cou-`ity Hlu-I ici pal .':ate; Dist-L-ict Coastal Water District Costa Mesa Courity Water Bi s :rlct r _ q_ C.Ir i._y ai Hur itiy«gt-.Q!b Beach . The Trv-ine Company Metrropo ii tai. 'Na-1^er District o_ Ca:"__LAarnia Ce-n t?emen. e o Cons truct-i Q. schedule S'al.. Joaqu- �-I ram`_e Irvine Rai;.ch Water District- is a -ece'?pt o.F� a re � _ �v�Se�_. 7i oe ress sche 'u e from E. C. Young., the con-t- a - or ons"--- -= is ,:vu L1 iY z.�geser�rQ:�r. He states �`s2 'vu�+.r� =c�"i certain re�Z'u ren-rteriL✓' 1!-i the S-pecific tions- _nnd certain., =eq,u,ir&,Qe5.ts oVe G+i"14i s ' G F?4 ?Q �'us" C^ �'o r,, r _ c 1 _c5i lsL't �; I L: f rom meet-.-Lng the orig:inal s-11c dine x,' t _a Y Ih.e SL"Ebmil i:z.ed. _ Ile J'ssifeel s that Laith he LQt"act"��t�i?� the s.-�1me .- -`"Lug heQ'ca- can-i 11 e e CQr-S tL-lu;..° .w• > I:'y ccpsi��:-ima"•'+.-e y T Q 30 �96, � " 9 9Tie i rU_-r_ - c3sch Water ? G. had hoped that the re- u' "Jt3:L would Gate s_ ced by the end aF thereby a�=Q-,.,i g "hose arc::-€ci es desirina C,+a-er belt-T/ CQa.s'_-al .9unc ioii. LLit' t? n Q �!e ".{rese"�TQ1_ _ ?Q= ^(3Q : .a_o-,,Ts v I'''et oiool i _�"3-..i�! Water i s�:.r '- ._s r i1sh-111 g construction of the -Laterco ney-�,_Qii between -he c g Orax e .County Feeder a ,.d the ne',,, East Ora--age County -``eeder No< 2 in order to a.4�e�?-t- €.e some Q tie J�:c�r�G 2.0 s:Lc^c� ' He??"s which have Qccured -in the e-._cl of the cou-na .y -;.-ie vast fetes' Suurn.ers m Without the reservoir this will l b re- _ _re Cvs d iil fgt s? 2 CC71?S1 tiP ^C Q is is�i vse tQi!a This type operation will be required unti w the reservoir is com-- Y >JleLedo t Ei w < G ' r 4 TF Ghe reservoir is co-mrale t.ed by a u-ne 30 y 196 5 i n con- formance with. the new L=__S._4i.,.Ie normal 07 er.at3_..o 1, should ... i ?e oSS hlC' by ��4?e summme"_ o 650 The irvine Ranch Water District -�7,All do everything i n it power to push. the � ob to complet-Lon at as early a . -%r -F'.d S � n: e. in .hwi.s mat-ter.ea e as possible and GSkJ u a f� f• there are ,a-ny7 i-rob i erts created by this. delay as far as- your operation concerned � - � feel tree' ._S'- C0=9.C:,�r.._e�, ?�..ca,S:� � t_:.:.._ :G Col"i-: :° L2c% ,�aS o ,�?'t? SLi�2' that a ua�Ss ac gory solution can he ' -worked out Very truly y yours , 40, '. W-- Iran H Eppin e: Maori ,der WHEcd OFFICIALS DOYLE MILLER o��VNTING}��� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER p�1o1�U// T ��/� BRANDER D. CASTLE CITY O T !W/V�V/( /I/ ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR Z Gav JAMES R. WHEELER • DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS __________.___________________________ ___--______ FRANK B. ARGUELLO P o. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA FINANCE DIRECTOR `' 'f'G►� eii,iybg,P``��� 92648 HOWARD ROBIDOUX COUuTV CPV POLICE CHIEF - r - DELBERT G. HIGGINS F ` COUNCILMEN IRE CHIEF DONALD D. SHIPLEY, MAYOR VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE ERNEST H. GISLER LIFEGUARD CHIEF �! OLLIN C. CLEVELAND ROBERT M. LAMBERT JAKE R. STEWART BUILDING DIRECTOR ' THOMAS H. WELCH WILLIS C. WARNER PLANNING DIRECTOR PAUL C. JONES EDWARD R. STANG 4� CITY CLERK - - WATER SUPERINTENDENT JAMES D. PLUNKETT CITY ATTORNEY BETTY DIEKOFF TREASURERS f e l Th,,e City Council of the City of Huntington' Beach at their regular meet ng,,held- June , 1, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. h977,. approving. and endor'sing . the Pacific Southwest Project Act. proposed by the six agency committee representing the California users 'of Colorado. River water. I The . Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 1977 be `.forwarded to you and urges your support in approving and endorsing the Pacific Southwest Project Act. Sincerely yours, Paul C. J es City Clerk PCJatr Enc., Res. #1977 IN6fa,�� - � ' City of Huntington Beach ,r o� Cali f omia ojuxte, 1964 flonorable Will la in E. Dannemeyer refs Capitol Building Dear Sir: W are' �,crC,w i tcopy of R.esolut Lon 19, 75 vihi b, was passed and adopteCby the. -t .0 nc 4: of use City o HuntJtngton Be4 I ch at thoit redular meetlpig orting the Metropolitan Water Diotrict and the Orange County Water D'i t.ict in theI ijrot of V").s Elet on: of Seer t ry of' h nt 4- ' e _I ift proposingten Oercent 0 ) ttbac' k in eater � pp!Zlied to California A" ° rai Co`wr do -Rive Souk n,crely, yoursCity Clerk. CJas n o s�. ' INfpy� =.z City t7 of Huntington Beach - w oQ California t Ol/NTY © June 2, 1964. Honorable James ER Whetmore State Capitol Building Sacramento, California ' We are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolut-ion, No. 1975 which was passe� and ad.opte by the City Cotzhcil of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular-.meeting held May 18, 1.9611., support-,.ng the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Water .District in their .protest of the action of Secretary of thcllln- terior Udall in proposing a ten percent (10 p) cutibdccit in water supplied to California from the Colorado R i�e�e° Source. V Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Cleric _ PCJ< s ' Enco Res, #1975 i. a f City of Huntington Beach California -�ilNTY OJune 2, 1964 Honorable James Bo Utt 103 Cannon Reuse Office Budding Washington 25, D.C. Dear Sir: We 'Are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Roach at their regular- meeting held May 1.8, 1964,E sup-porting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Water District in their pro-best of the action of .Secs eta.ry of tie Interior . Udall in 'proposing a ten percent (10%) cutback in water suppliedto Calif orn7afrom the Colorado diver Source. Sinceroly yours, Paul Co Jones City Clerk !:ICJ:-sr Enc> Res . #1975 j ��ING"fpy�� _ o City of Huntington Beach o� Cali f omia �Y Honorable Richard T. Hanna 1516 Bongworth House Oflice Building \ � Washington 25, D�C m 1 Dear Sid' :. We are transmitting herewith a copy cif' Resolution N0.+ 1975 which was passed and adopted 'by the City Coun.cltt of tlae City of Huntington Beach at their regular mee�;ink held May 189 1964, supporting the Metropolitan. hater �i„`trig and .the •Ox°anze County Municipal Water District in t e Y protest ofthe action of Secretary of the Interior Uda'111 .: in 'propcas.in ten pe cent (l0 cuttac in t,� ter supp 3 ec l t. Cal'_' ' ni a from the Colorado River Source, Sincerely yours ;° � r ft Paul C. Jones" City C"lellk i Po"Ji,s r Res. 41975 sir+ V. i! R, NSINGp�, City ®f Huntington Beach i^ Califomia OJune 2, .1964 Honorable Edmund C. Erown State Capitol Sacramento, California Dear S ILl r; We are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 w ich VTas passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular ,meetin held May 1% 1964, supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Water District in the _r pretest of the action of Secretary ofthe In- teriorUdall in proposing a ten percent (10%) cutback in water supplied to -Cal forn:ia from the Colorado Riper Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJssr Enc. Res. #197 . i. it f l P IN City of Huntington Beach v . Califomia C .mod+ E �c�/gRY 0 June 2, 1964 O Honorable Clair ft.gle Senate Office BuildJ'.n Washington 25, D.C. Dear S' r W 4 re transmitting hereUriJh ecopy of resolution 'o., 1975 which was pass:eel and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular, meeting held May 18, 1964, supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Water District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the In- terior Udall �n proposing a ten percent (�0%) cutback in water supplied to Cal f6rnia from the Colorado River- Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCB sr Enc a Res. 1975 . 4 I �Slx6fpH City ®f Huntington Beach o� Cali f omia ouxr�r OJune 2, 1964 Honorable Thomas Yuchel Senate Office Building Washington 25, D. C. u Dear S I r e: We are transmitting herewith a copy- of Resolution No. 197 .which was passed and adopted by the City Council 'e of the City of Huntington Beach at their rergular Knee t- ink held May 18, 1964, ..supporting the Metropolitan: Water District and the grange County Municipal Water District In their protest of the action of Secretary of the In- terior Udall in proposing a ten percent (10%) cutback in water :supplied to Ca?iforz ia from the Colorado River F Source. w Sincerely yours, Paul C s Jones City Clerk PCJpsr Eno.-' Res. 1975 . . IN -✓ v City of Huntin ton Beach California June 2, 1964 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 1111 Sunset Boulevard Los Angeles, California Gentlemen: e are transmitting herewith :a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council ®f the City of Huntington Beach at their rogolar meeting held May 18, 1964, supporting the Metropolitan treater District and the Orange County Municipal Water District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the in- terior Udall in proposing a ten percent (107.) cutback in water supplied to California from the Colorado River Source. . Sincerely yours, Paul C Jones City Clerk pCJ.sr Encm Res. P1975 �SINGf�, City of Huntington Beach California dJune 2, 1964 Orange County Municipal rater District o Box 1982 s Santa Ana, California Gentlemen We axe -transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting head May 18, 1964, supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Watek District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the in- terior Udall in proposing a ten percent '(10%) cutback in water supplied to California from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C. .zones City Clerk PCJ s s 0. Enca Res #1975 IN � y City of Huntin ton Beach California F � ,dune 2, 1964 City of Costa Mesa 695 West 19th Street Costa mesa, California Gentlemen: We are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Mays 13, 1964, supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County nicipal Water District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the . In® terior Udall in proposing a ten percent (10%) . cutback in water suppl idd �to California from the -Colorado, River Source. Sincefely you r&,' . Paul C. .cones, City Clerk PCJear Enc: Res . #1975 I a 1 f 1. IN City of Huntington Beach California OJune z, 1964 1s' City of Wes trains ter, .. 14331 olive Street Westminster, California Gentlemen-., e are transmitting here��ith a. copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was, passed and adopted by the: City Council of .the City ref Huntin.-z—as Beach at 4 theft, regular meeting held May 18, 1954, supporting the Metropolitan Water District arid. the Orange County Municipal stater District in .their pro€.est .of the action of Secretary of , the In- . terior Udall in proposing a . ten percent (107o) cutback in. eater supplied to California from the Colorado Rive Sources Sincerely yours, Paul C o Jones City Clerk PCJ:_sr Enc Res. #1975 IN6�dp City of Huntington Beach *°'o California. ��e►C�1xb+`��E OJune , 1964 City of Fountain talley 9463, Talbert Fountain Malley, California Ce�atl : �r o We are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the C:' t cif Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held MAY 1964, supporting the Metropolitan eater District and the Orange County Municipal Water District in their protest of the action of Secretary. cif the - in- terior Udell in proposing a tea percent- (10%) cutback in water supplied to. California from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C.-Jones City Clerk PCJsar Enca Rena 01975 J y City ®f Huntington Beach r � California LINTY �� OJune 2, 1964 City" of Santa Ana 217 Korth '4v !.n Street Santa ? rta i California Gentlemen. We are tranomitting herewith a cop of Resolution No. 1975 which -was passed and adopted Zy the Cite Council of the Cif,y of, Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held May 8, 1964, supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal pater District in their protest of tbe' action. of Secretary of the In- ter for Udall in proposing a ten percent (1ft) �utback in eater supplied to California from the Colorado Riser Source 3 Sincerely yours, Paul. C. Jones City Clerk PCJ sr Enca Res. #1975 IN City of Huntin ton Beach Q California out June 2, 1964 City' of Garden Grove 11391 Acacia Carden Grove, ,California Gentlemen- We , are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held May 18, 1964, supporting the, Metropolitan dater District and the ®range County Municipal gates District . in their protest of the action of Secretary' of the 1 terior Udall in pxoposing a ten percent (107.) cutback in water supplied to California from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJaer Enca A so 1975 IN ,y� City of Huntington Beach California June 20 1964 F Honorable John A. Murdyo Jr. State Capitol Building Sacramento, California D' ear S i °: Wd are, transmitting herewith acopy of Resolution 6. 1915 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held May 18, 1964 supporting the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County !Au itipal eater District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the 'interior Udall in pro posing a ten percent (ITI.) cutback in water supplied o California from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely yours, Paul C. .hones City Clerk rn+c: Res. t 1975 :y, I IN �11N� City of Huntington Beach California OJune 20 1964 Honorable Robert E. Badham State Capitol Building Sacramento, California Dear S ir: Ide are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution. No. 1975 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at -their regular meeting held May 18, 1964, supportinig the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Municipal Vlater District in their protest.. ,of the action of Secretary of the Interior Wall in pro- posing a ten percent (IM.) cutback in 't-cater supplied to California from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely 'yours, r, Paul. C. Jones City Clerk PGJ r e Enc4 Res. 1975 s IN City ®f Huntington Beach California OJJune 2, 1964 City of Seal Beach 201 Sth Street Seal Beach, California Gentleman: lie are transmitting herewith a copy of Resolution NO. 1975 which teas passed and adopted by the City Council of' the City of Huntington Beach ,at their regular meeting held MAy 18, 1964, auppotting the Metropolitan-Water District and the Orange County Municipal eater District in their protest of the action of Secretary of the In- terior Udall in proposin a ten percent (1O%) cutback in cater supplied to Cal fornia from the Colorado River Source. Sincerely yours, _x Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJvar Enc: Res. #1975 G RANGE OUNTY DIRECTORS ' OFFICERS UNICIPAL ATER ISTRICT GLEM M. MC GOLLOCH DAVID K. JONES President GERALD E. PRICE THOMAS S. MADDOCK 412 SOUTH LYON STREET P.O. BOX 1982 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 General Alanl'ger CLEM M. MC COLLOCH _ Secretnrp-Treasurer PHONE. 541.2431 AREA CODE 714 GLENN- Pt ALLEN n WINTHROP O. GORDON •JP, W. B. HELLIS Attorney f June 24, 1964 City of Huntington Beach P: 0., Box. 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention <Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk Gentlemen: We appreciate. receiving your letter of June 8 with which you enclosed a copy of Resolution No. 1977 adopted by the city council of the city of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting on June 1, 1964, endorsing the Pacific' Southwest Plroject Act proposed by the six-agency committee representing the California users of Colorado River water. To keep you abreast of the action taken by this district, we are enclosing a copy of Resolution No. 349 adopted by the board of directors of Orange County Municipal Water District at their regular meeting on April 15, 1964. Very truly yours, ORANGE COUNTY MUNICIPAL WATER'DISTRICT T.S. Maddock General Manager Enclosure ` t • 1 { 2 RESOLUTIL0174 OF T 11S BOARD OF DZ6'EC"4 ORS OF 1011-1ANG CO 1,11-Y �'�U1'y�C 1 AL 4'd� �i..: D Iu L i ar A i ti L`aL3'd� at AND j 3 hhs y- r C_ 7� -� TM, /A ti IF IC* / UTI 7EST" 7Jr.`1 g�hrry ACT 1 4"•1'i�LsrJ w1.+'1.? S.f PACIFIC*i V �LSi i�b���i�3tJ a b#:1,:.7J�\✓A ��.a.�. P:�GPOSED BY TIM SLt ACE€°s Y 001, 1ITTE I .i 4 1 aCs Ts? CA lx°'43' 1 3� O "GLO-RADO %'�.�VEIR Y^s3M 2 j i 4 , 6 WE IM,�,S, S. 1658, authorizing the CeY'tira3l Arizona Project 7 is pending before the Congress and such bill if enacted would ere- 8 -to serious dater supply p::oblems for Southern California and xv,ould 9 irape?e the solution of the water supply pa:ob1 s of the Pacific 10 Southwest and the entire Colorado Rive- B: sAn and 11 1,711M MAS, secretary of Zile Interior Udall has proposed a 12 Pacl.fic Southwest Water Plan which if adouted would ulitmately re- 13 sul.t in abandonment . of the Metropolitan' eater' District° s Colorado 14 River Aqueduct, wAhicht now furnishes a course of water for nine 15 million peolale, without assuring an adegtmte replacement sup l y o.� . 16r . water for Southern. Cali. ornia and without .providing .a solution .to 17 the mazy.other existing and future Colorado River 5vatot: supply 18 problems; and 19 ';03",IE[XAS, the Six Aeyaacy 'C' r. ai ttea, xaprese nting t1je users 20 of Colorado River water in Sout'aern California, has caused to be 2? drafted. a. proposed Pacific Southwest Project Act for the purpose o: 22 meeting the present and future w Ler d=soda of the Pacific South- 23 vest re Sion by ro ° . ai a; for the transfer 0. water from areas of. 24 surplus to areas of deficiency; and 3 , 25 WIIMP , said Proposed act would provide for protection 26 of ehi.tiny ^.ali.fornia apses of Colorado River dater to the axtent 27 of 4,L4 0,000 acre-feet per year, would, auehorize the Central. �kri- f' 28 zona Project:, Dixie Project, and South�e�.n NevadaWaterSupply P�.o-. i 3 29 J evt and Moapa Valley Pumping Project, and voul:d :require i:ivesti- i 30 Sation and report by th:e Secretary of the Interior- as to addi`ialal. 31 ( supplies of water: to sustral: the present development of the region, t 32 I prov1..de for noLimal. growth., Lan-prove the -quality of the wate in the WINTHROP O.GORDON I� Pt YNw Gnd reduce the pen pibla�Jl�i:+s for the [1pp�`.1. �C:aiii.t.c of th0 ATTORNEY AT LAW 923 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK BUILDING I , s 900 N.BROADWAY 0 it SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA; Kf tdBERLY 7-2543 1 Colorado River: 2 110'vV 1�EF01.E BE IT RESOLVED2 by the Board of DirectM's , TM 3 of Orange CoLnuty M.-taiicipal Water District, that the Pacific South- 4 West Project Act proposed by the Six Agency Committee as a means 5 for augmenting and developing the water rcso-=ce-_a of the Colorado 6 River be approved and endorsed; and 7 BE IT M",TMR RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be 8 senzt- , to Senrators Thor as H. Kuchel and Clair Engle, to the melabers 9 of the California Delegation in the House of. Representatives, to 10 Governor Edm-md G. Bmzi, to Attorney General Stanley Mosk, to 11 Administrator of the Resources Agency of the State of California 12 Hugo Fisher, to Director of Water rZesources William E. �ai:ne, to 13 Or Inge 'Com-ity members of the Califoi-nia 'Legislature, to the Boaird 14 of Supervisors of Oi�:=6!e CoLn-ity, and to Orange County Water District. 15 16 Said resolution was adopted, on roll call, by the follow- 17 in& vote: 18 AYES** Directors VMS: Directors 19 ABSEINT: Directors 20 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS . 21 CODUTY OF OIUNGE 220 1, T. S . MADDOCK, do hereby certify and declare that I are the Secretary of the Board of Directors of 0-.Lzano-e (County Municipal Ufa- 23 ter District and make this certificate in that capacity. I further certify and declare that on the 15th day of April, 1964, at a regu- 24 lar meeting of the Board of Directors of Orange County k1unicipal ter District, held in the Conference Room, Boyle EngineerinS, 412 25 South Lyon Street, in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California, resolution No . 1-49 of the Board of Director:; of said 26 District was duly and regularly passed and adlopted, ' and that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of said resolution. 27 DATED: This 11th day of May 1964. 28 29 30 1 Secretary of the Board -&-f-E-ilrectors of- 31 Orange County Municipal Water District. 32 WINTHROP O.GORDON ATTORNEY AT LAW 923 CITIZENS NATIONAL 2. BANK BUILDING 900 N.BROADWAY SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA KIMBERLY 7-2543 CITY CLERK'S ssTII CONGRD SESSI01V He Re 11395 2D SESSION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MAY 2611964 Mr. UTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Con, mittee on Interior and Insular Affairs A BILL To authorize the coordinated development of the water resources of the Pacific Southwest, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and (louse of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 TITLE I—THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PROJECT: 4 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT AND DESCRIP- 5 TION OF ITS COMPONENTS 6 SEC. 101. OBJECTIVES.—The purpose of this Act is to 7 initiate the execution of a regional plan to meet in full the 8 deficiencies in water supply, present and anticipated, in both 9 the Upper and Lower Basins of the Colorado River, to 10 authorize the construction of certain projects within the. 11 lower basin to transport water to areas of deficiency, and J. 99-001—EE 2 1 to authorize the coordinated development of the power 2 resources of the lower basin in order to furnish power for 3 pumping water into and in conveyance works, and for sale 4 as a means of financial assistance to the projects herein 5 authorized and to those which the Congress may hereafter 6 authorize for the importation of water into the Colorado 7 River Basin. 8 SEC. 102. COMPONENTS OF TI3E PACIFIC SOUTHWEST 9 PROJECT.—The Pacific Southwest project shall consist of 10 the following components: 11 (1) The transmountain division, to consist of such 12 projects as the Congress may hereafter authorize for con- 13 struction, pursuant to the investigation and report author- 14 ized by title III, to import water into the Colorado River 15 Basin. 16 (2) The main stream reservoir division, to consist of 17 Bridge Canyon Dam and Marble Canyon Dam, their power- 18 plants, transmission lines, and related facilities, authorized 19 for construction in title IV. To these shall be added Hoover 20 Dam, Davis Dam, and Parker Dam, their powerplants, 21 Government-owned transmission lines associated therewith, 22 and related facilities, after existing statutory amortization re- 23 quirements with respect to each of them have been satisfied, 24 all as provided in title IV. 3 1 (3) The central Arizona aqueduct division, in Arizona 2 and New Mexico, authorized for construction in title V. 3 (4) The Dixie division, in Utah, authorized for con- 4 struction in title VI. 5 (5) The southern Nevada division, authorized for con- 6 struction in title VII. 7 (6) The conservation division, comprising salvage and 8 other operations for which provision is made in title VIII. 9 (7) The fish and wildlife and recreation division, com- 10 prising undertakings for which provision is made in title IX. 11 (g) The works to be constructed for the benefit of main 12 stream Indian reservations, referred to in title X. 13 SHORT TPl`LE 14 SEC. 103. This Act may be cited as the Pacific South- 15 west Project Act. 16 TITLE II—TI-IE PACIFIC -SOUTHWEST DEVELOP- 17 MENT FUND; ALLOCATION AND REPAYMENT 18 OF COSTS 19 SEC. 201. PACIFIC SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT FUND 20 ESTABLISTIEv.—There is hereby established a separate fund 21 in the Treasury of the United States to be known as the 22 Pacific Southwest development fund (hereinafter referred 223 to as the "development fund") which shall be available 24 only for carrying out the provisions of this Act. 4 1 SEC. 202. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.-- 2 There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from the 3 general fund to the development fund from time to time 4 a total of not to exceed $1,478,000,000 to carry out the pur- 5 poses of this Act, of which the amounts available to carry, 6 out the purposes of the respective titles shall be limited to 7 the amounts which those titles severally authorize to be 8 appropriated from the development fund. �I i 9 SEC. 203. COST ALLOCATIONS.-- (a) Upon completion 10 of each division or separable feature thereof, the Secretary 11 shall report to the Congress the total costs of constructing 12 the same, together with his allocations of such costs among 13 commercial power, irrigation, municipal and industrial water 14 supply (all of which shall be reimbursable in the manner 15 provided in this Act) , and flood control, navigation, area 16 redevelopment, recreation, and fish and wildlife (all of which 17 shall be nonreimbursable) . 18 (b) The Secretary shall include in costs allocated to 19 power, but to be returned without interest, such portion 20 of the costs properly allocable to irrigation as are in excess 21 of the irrigators' ability to repay, and all of the costs allocated 22 to the transmountain division. 23 (c) The interest rate to be used for purposes of com- 24 puting interest during construction and interest on the unpaid 25 balance of those portions of the reimbursable costs which 5 1 are properly allocable to commercial power development 2 and municipal and industrial water supply shall be deter- 3 mined by the Secretary of the Treasury, as of the beginning 4 of the fiscal year in which this Act becomes effective, on the 5 basis of the computed average interest rate payable by the 6 Treasury upon its outstanding marketable public obligations, 7 which are neither due nor callable for redemption for fifteen 8 years from date of issue. If the interest rate so computed is 9 not a multiple of one-eighth of 1 per centum, the rate of 10 interest to be used for these purposes shall be the multiple 11 of one-eighth of 1 per centum next lower than the rate so 12 computed. 13 SEC. 204. REPAYMENT OF REIMBURSABLE COST 14 ALLOCATIONS.- (a) The costs of each feature allocated to 15 commercial power or municipal and industrial waster supply 16 shall be repaid from the development fund to the general 17 fund of the Treasury within a period not exceeding 50 18 years from the date of completion of each such feature, with 19 interest. i 20 (b) The costs of each feature allocated to irrigation 21 shall be repaid from the development fund to the general 22 fiord within a period not exceeding fifty years from the 23 completion of each such feature, exclusive of any develop- 24 ment periods authorized by the reclamation law, without 2-5 interest. J. 9,9001—EE 2 6 1 (c) The costs allocated to the transmountain division 2 shall be repaid from the development fund to the general 3 fund, without interest, as rapidly as revenues accrue in the 4 transmountain account after the costs referred to in para- 5 graphs (a) and (b) have been repaid, and within such zn 6 period of time as the Congress may specify in the authoriza- 7 tion of construction of the transmountain division works. 8 SEC. 205. RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES.— (a) 9 The Secretary shall determine charges for the storage and 10 delivery of water for irrigation, within the capacity of the 11 irrigators' ability to. pay, in accordance with the Reclama- 12 tion Project Act of 1939, with proper adjustments for the 13 repayment periods authorized by section 204. 14 (b) The Secretary shall determine rates and charges 15 for electric power and energy, and for the storage and 16 delivery of water for municipal and industrial use, in accord- 17 ance with the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, with proper 18 adjustments for the repayment periods authorized by section 19 204. Rates and charges for electric power and energy 20 shall include such increments as are required, in the Secre- 21 tary's judgment, to recover, without interest, costs allocated 22 under section 203 (b) to irrigation to the extent that such 23 costs exceed the irrigators' ability to pay, and further incre- 24 ments, consistent with the fair value of the services, to be 25 accumulated in the transmountain account in accordance with 7 1 section 207 (d) for repayment of the cost of construction of 2 works that the Congress may hereafter authorize to import 3 additional supplies of water into the Colorado River Basin. 4 SEC. 206. CONTRACTS.— (a) The Secretary is author- s ized to enter into contracts for the storage and delivery of 6 water, and repayment of the cost of works allocated to irriga- 7 tion and municipal and industrial water supply, meeting the 8 revenue requirements of section 205, in accordance with the 9 Reclamation Project Act of 1939: Provided, That contracts 10 relating to municipal water supply may be made without 11 regard to the limitations of the last sentence of section 9 (c) 12 of the Reclamation Project Act. of 1939 (53 Stat. 1194; 13 U.S.C. 485h (c) ) : Provided furiher, That contracts for the 14 storage and delivery of water originating in the Colorado 15 River system and diverted from the main stream of the Colo- 16 rado River in the lower basin shall conform to section 5 of 17 the Boulder Canyon Project Act. 18 (b) The Secretary is authorized to enter into contracts 19 for the sale of electric power and energy, meeting the revenue 20 requirements of section 205, in accordance with the Recla- 21 mation Project Act of 1939 as amended: Provided, That the 22 period thereof, in the Secretary's discretion, may extend to 23 fifty years, and may be accompanied by a right of renewal. 24 SEC. 207. REVENUES TO BE CREDITED TO DEVELOP- 25 MENT FUND; DISPOSITION.— (a) There shall be paid into 8 1 the development fund currently (1) all revenues collected in 2 connection with the operation of facilities constructed under 3 the authority of this Act (except entrance, admission, and 4 other recreation user fees or charges and proceeds received 5 from recreation concessionaires) and (2) all revenues from 6 power operations at Hoover Dam and Parker-Davis projects 7 which, after completion of capital repayments required by 8 statute (which shall exclude allocations to flood control) , are 9 surplus to the operation, maintenance, and replacement re- 10 quirements of those projects and not needed to reimburse the 11 Upper Colorado River Basin fund (70 Stat. 105, 107) as 12 provided in the Glen Canyon filling criteria (27 Fed. Reg. 13 6851) for any expenditures made from that fund to meet 14 deficiencies in generation at Hoover Dam during the filling 15 period of reservoirs of storage units of the Colorado River 16 storage project. 17 (b) Revenues accruing to the development fund shall 18 be available for annual appropriations for the operation, 19 maintenance, and provision for replacement of the projects 20 the construction of which is .authorized by this Act. 21 (c) There shall be transferred from the development 22 fund to the general fund of the Treasury, as of the close of 23 each fiscal year, without further appropriation, that year's 24 component of principal and interest, conforming to the pay- 9 1 out schedule last reported by the Secretary to the Congress 2 in conformity with section 208. 3 (d) Any balance remaining in the development fund 4 at the end of a fiscal year, after satisfying the requirements 5 of paragraphs (b) and (c) , shall be transferred to the trans= 6 mountain account in the development fund, to be accumulated 7 and made available only for repayment of the cost of con- 8 struction of projects that the Congress may hereafter ad- 9 thorize for the importation of supplemental water supplies 10 into the Colorado River Basin. Balances in the transmoun= 11 tain account shall be invested in United States Govern= 12 ment bonds, and the interest thereon shall be deposited in 13 the transmountain account. 14 'SEC. 208. PAYOUT SCHEDULES; REPORTS; BUDGETS.- 15 (a) The Secretary of the Interior shall furnish to the Con- 16 gross, not less frequently than once each fiscal year, a repott 17 on his operations under this Act, which shall include a payout 13 schedule which shall show, with respect to each division, and 19 cumulatively with respect to all divisions, (1) the capital 20 invested, the amounts repaid, and the unrecovered balance 21 thereof; (2) gross revenues to the development fund. re 22 ceived and anticipated for each year of the repayment period: 23 of each division and of each separable unit thereof, from 10 j 1 power, from storage and delivery of water for municipal 2 and industrial use, and for irrigation use, and gross revenues 3. from other sources; (3) amounts received from increments 4 to power rates and charges which have been credited to the 5 repayment of capital allocated to irrigation, and credited to ,6 the transmountain account; (4) annual costs, historic and 7 anticipated, of operation, maintenance, and replacements; 8 (5) historic and anticipated net revenues; (6) installments 9 paid and to be paid, of interest and of principal, from the 10 development fund to the Treasury; (7) unpaid balances; 11 and (8) sums in the transmountain .account available for 12 repayment of the cost of construction of projects to import 13 supplemental water supplies into the Colorado River Basin. 14 (b) Business-type budgets shall be submitted to the 15 Congress annually for all operations financed by the develop- 16 went fund. 17 TITLE III—THE TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVISION 18 SEC. 301. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR AUTHORIZED TO 19 INVESTIG}ATE AND REPORT.— (a) The Secretary of the In- 20 terior is authorized and directed to report to the Congress 21 not later than three years after the effective date of this 22 Act 23 (1) his estimate of the long-range water supply 24 available for consumptive use in the Upper.and Lower 25 Basins of the Colorado River, respectively; 11 1 (2) the water requirements in the upper and 2 lower basins, at present and as estimated for the years 3 anno Domini 1975, 2000, 2030, and under ultimate 4 anticipated conditions; 5 (3) the present and anticipated deficiencies in water 6 Supply; 7 (4) the quantities of water which, imported into 8 the Colorado River Basin, would eliminate the said 9 deficiencies; 10 (5) the quantities of water which, imported into 11 the Colorado River Basin, would make possible the 12 consumptive use of 7,500,000 acre-feet per annum in 13 the upper basin, and eliminate present and anticipated 14 deficiencies in the lower basin; and 15 (6) alternative sources from which water might 16 be imported into the Colorado River Basin in the quan- 17 tities found required under paragraphs 4 and 5, with 18 preliminary plans of projects which would accomplish 19 such importations, their capital and annual costs per 20 acre-foot of water at stated points of delivery; recom- 21 mendations for the construction of such projects in stages 22 or phases related in size and time to the projected de= 23 ficiencies, recommendations as to State participation in 24 construction and operation; recommendations of methods 25 for repayment of the costs of construction, operation, and 12 1 maintenance of such projects; and recommendations, 2 conforming to paragraph (b) , for development of the 3 water resources of the river basins from which such 4 water would be imported, adequate to supply the ulti- 5 mate requirements of the areas of origin of such water, 6 in addition to supplying the quantities proposed to be 7 imported into the Colorado River Basin. 8 (b) The planning of all such importation work shall be 9 subject to the following conditions: (i) diversions shall be 10 subordinate to all existing and anticipated future needs with- 11 in the watersheds of origin, including the retention of water 12 in the watersheds of origin if estimates of future needs prove 13 insufficient; (ii) financial assistance from the development 14 fund shall be available for the construction of any future 15 projects in the watersheds of origin if such assistance is not 16 otherwise provided; and (iii) additional costs of future 17 projects, caused by the preemption of lower cost water 18 sources which otherwise would benefit the areas of origin, 19 shall be offset by assistance from the development fund to 20 the extent that the costs chargeable to such projects would 21 be no greater than if there had been no export to the Colo- 22 rado River Basin. 23 (c) The Secretary shall consult the Pacific Southwest 24 Regional Water Commission, created by title XI, and shall 25 submit his report to the affected States, in the basins of 13 1 origin as well as in the Colorado River Basin, for comment 2 in accordance with the procedure required by section 1 (b) 3 of the .Flood Control Act of 1944, prior to submission to the 4 Congress. 5 SEC. 302. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR 6 THE INVESTIGATION AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 301.—The 7 appropriation of not to exceed $5,000,000 is hereby author- 8 ized from the development fund for the purposes stated in 9 section 301. This amount shall be nonreimbursable. 10 SEC. 303. CONSTRUCTION TO BE PRECEDED BY FUR- 11 THER AUTHORIZATION.—Construction of the works referred 12 to in section 301 shall not be commenced unless and until 13 the Congress shall authorize such construction and appro- 14 priate funds therefor. Such appropriations, if made, shall 15 be in addition to the amounts authorized to be appropriated 16 in this Act. 17 TITLE IV—THE MAIN STREAM RESERVOIR 18 DIVISION 19 SEC. 401. AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION.—The 20 Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct, operate, 21 and maintain: 22 (1) A dam in Bridge Canyon, on the main stream of 23 the Colorado River in Arizona, more particularly described 24 in the Bureau of Reclamation's "Supplemental Information 25 Report of Bridge Canyon Project, Arizona, January 1964", J. 99001—EE 3 14 1 adequate to impound water at a normal surface elevation of 2 approximately-one thousand eight hundred and sixty-six feet 3 above sea level. 4 (2) A dam in Marble Canyon, on the main stream of 5 the Colorado River in Arizona, more particularly described 6 in "Supplemental Information Report on Marble Canyon 7 Project, Arizona, January 1964", adequate to impound 8 water at a normal surface elevation approximately three 9 thousand one hundred and forty-three feet above sea level. 10 (3) Powerplants and appurtenant transforming, 11 switching, and other facilities at each of such dams, of such 12 characteristics and capacity as, in the Secretary's judgment, 13 are best adapted to the comprehensive development of the 14 power resources of the river. 15 (4) Transmission lines interconnecting Marble Canyon 16 powerplant and Bridge Canyon powerplant with Hoover, 17 Davis, Parker, Glen, and other Federal powerplants or sys- 18 tems, now in existence or hereafter ,authorized, of chara,cter- 19 isties and capacity best adapted, in the judgment of the 20 Secretary, to realize the optimum values of the intercon- 21 nected powerplants on the Colorado River. 22 (5) Transmission lines to deliver power from the afore- 23 said interconnected Colorado River power system to project 24 pumping plants and to major load centers. 15 1 SEC. 402. DISPOSITION OF PowE'R.— (a) Power and 2 energy generated at Bridge and Marble Canyon powerplants 3 shall be made available, at cost, for pumping water into 4 and in the central Arizona aqueduct, referred to in title V, 5 and into and in such aqueducts for the importation of water 6 into the Colorado River Basin as the Congress may hereafter 7 authorize as part of the tra.nsmountain division, referred to in 8 title III. The project accounts shall show, as costs asso- 9 ciated with the storage and delivery of water transported 10 by each such aqueduct, respectively, the cost of production 11 and delivery of power and energy so made available to that 12 aqueduct, including appropriate pro rata shares of amortiz1a- 13 tion, operation, and maintenance expense. 14 (b) Power and energy generated at Bridge and Marble 15 Canyon powerplants in excess of the requirements of para- 16 graph (a) shall be sold or exchanged by the Secretary of 17 the Interior in accordance with the criteria stated in title 18 II, at such points on the transmission system referred to in 19 section 401 as may be agreed upon. The revenues there- 20 from shall be paid into the development fund. 21 SEC. 403. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATION..— 22 The appropriation of not to exceed $750,000,000 from the 23 development fund is hereby authorized for the construction 24 of the works authorized by this title. 16 1 TITLE V—THE CENTRAL ARIZONA AQUEDUCT 2 DIVISION 3 SEC. 501. AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION.—The 4 Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct the central 5 Arizona aqueduct and related facilities in Arizona and Ne- 6 vada, as described more particularly in the Bureau of Recla- 7 mation's "Supplemental Information Report on Central Ari- 8 zona Project, Arizona, January 1964," to divert not to 9 exceed one million two hundred thousand acre-feet annually 10 from Havasu Lake on the Colorado River, and consisting of 11 the following principal elements: 12 (1) Pumping facilities on the main stream with a 13 diversion capacity not to exceed one thousand eight hun- 14 dred and ninety cubic feet per second. 15 (2) Granite Reef aqueduct, with a capacity not to 16 exceed one thousand eight hundred cubic feet per second, 17 from the vicinity of Havasu Lake on the Colorado River i 18 to the vicinity of Granite Reef Dam in the Salt River j 19 in Arizona, together with powerplants thereon. i 20 (3) The Salt-Gila aqueduct, with a capacity not to 21 exceed one thousand two hundred and seventy-five cubic i 22 feet per second, connecting the Granite Reef aqueduct 23 with points in the Gila Valley, Arizona, and necessary 24 pumping plants on that aqueduct. (4) Maxwell. Dam and Reservoir, with a capacity 17 1 of approximately eight hundred and sixty thousand acre- 2 feet, on the Salt River, below its confluence with the 3 Verde River, Arizona.- 4 (5) Maxwell power and pumping plant, equipped 5 to operate both as a power generating plant and as a 6 pumping plant to pump water from Granite Reef into 7 storage in Maxwell Reservoir. 8 (6) Tucson aqueduct, with powerplants thereon, to 9 deliver not to exceed one hundred thousand acre-feet of 10 Colorado River water from a point on the Salt-Gila aque- 11 duct to the vicinity of Tucson, Arizona. 12 (7) Buttes Dam and Reservoir, with a capacity of 13 approximately three hundred and sixty-six thousand 14 acre-feet, on the Gila River in Arizona. 15 (8) Charleston Dam and Reservoir, with a capacity 16 of approximately two hundred and thirty-eight thousand 17 acre-feet, on the San Pedro River, Arizona.. 18 (9) An aqueduct, with a capacity of approximately 19 twelve thousand acre-feet annually, from San Pedro 20 River and Charleston Dam and Reservoir to Tucson. 21 (10) IIooker Dam and Reservoir, with a capacity 22 of approximately ninety-eight thousand acre-feet, on the 23 Gila River in New Mexico. 24 (11) Transmission lines connecting the Bridge- 18 1 Marble powerplants with major pumping plants, on the 2 central Arizona aqueduct. 3 (12) Transmission lines connecting power generat- 4 ing plants on the central Arizona aqueduct with major 5 load centers. 6 SEC. 502. SENIORITY OF EXISTING WATER RIGHTS. 7 RECOGNIZED.— (a) In the administration of article II (B) 8 (3) of the decree of the United States Supreme Court in 9 Arizona against California, all rights to the consumptive use, 10 of water to be diverted by or for the central Arizona aqueduct 11 from the main stream of the Colorado River shall be junior 12 to all of the following senior existing rights to waters of the 13 main stream, including all present perfected rights: Rights 14 of water users served under contracts with the United States 15 by diversion works heretofore constructed, and decreed rights 16 of Federal reservations, in Arizona and Nevada; and such 17 rights in California to the aggregate annual consumptive use 18 of four million four hundred thousand acre-feet of water 19 of the main stream of the Colorado River. 20 ;(b) Shortages shall be first borne by the junior rights 21 of users in Arizona served by the central Arizona aqueduct 22 before any shortages shall be borne by any of the senior 23 existing rights recognized above: Provided, That this section 24 shall not affect the relative priorities, among themselves, of 19 1 water rights in Arizona, California, and Nevada which are 2 senior to rights served by the central Arizona. aqueduct, or 3 amend any provision of the decree of the Supreme Court of 4 the United States in Arizona against California. 5 (c) All contracts entered into by the United States 6 for the storage and delivery of water from the main stream 7 to users in Arizona by means of the central Arizona aque- 8 duct, and all regulations promulgated therefor, shall incor- 9 porate the provisions of this section. 10 SEC. 503. IMPORTED WATER.— (a) In the event that 11 the Congress shall hereafter authorize the importation of 12 water from other river basins into the Colorado River Basin, 13 the United States shall have the right to satisfy any right to 14 the use of water from the main stream of the Colorado River 15 in the lower basin, in whole or in part, by the delivery of 16 water so imported, in conformity with the conditions stated 17 in paragraph (b) of this section. To the extent that rights 18 senior to those served by the central Arizona aqueduct are 19 thus satisfied, the Secretary may deliver water to or through 20 that aqueduct which section 502 would otherwise require 21 to be withheld and delivered to the holders of senior rights. 22 (b) The United States may satisfy any right to the 23 use of water from the main stream of the Colorado River by 24 the delivery of water not originating in the natural drainage 20 1 basin of the Colorado River so long as, but only so long as, 2 such imported water is delivered in conformity with each and 3 all of the following conditions: 4 (1) Quantities of Colorado River water, and of im- 5 ported water, in the aggregate, supplied to the water 6 user shall be not less than the quantities of Colorado 7 River water which that user is entitled to receive from 8 the main stream under its contract with the United 9 States, as defined or limited in the decree of the Supreme 10 Court of the .United States in Arizona against Cali- 11 forma; 12 (2) Cost of imported water to the water user shall 13 not exceed cost of a like quantity of water to that user, 14 if available and supplied from waters of the Colorado 15 River main stream; } 16 (3) Quality of imported water supplied to the water 17 user shall not be inferior to that of water available to 18 that user from waters of the Colorado River main 19 stream; 20 (4) Point of delivery of imported water to the 21 water user shall be at the point or points of delivery 22 for Colorado River main stream water specified in the 23 water user's contract with the United States, or at the 24 water user's points of use; and 25 (5) Times of delivery of imported water shall be 21 1 the same as those at which water would have been de- 2 livered to the user if supplied from waters of the Colo- ' 3 rado River main stream under the water user's contract 4 with the United States. 5 (c) If the importation of water into the Colorado River 6 Basin makes available for release, as determined by the Sec- 7 retary, sufficient water to satisfy annual consumptive use in 8 Arizona, California, and Nevada in excess of seven million 9 and five hundred thousand acre-feet, by means of diversions 10 from the main stream, such excess shall be apportioned in 11 like manner as is provided in article II (B) (2) of the decree 12 of the Supreme Court in Arizona against California (373 13 U.S. 546 (1964) ) , notwithstanding that all or a portion of 14 the waters constituting such excess may have originated out- 15 side the Colorado River Basin; but the restrictions stated in 16 paragraph (b) shall not apply to such excess. 17 SEC. 504. LIMITATIONS ON SERVICE AREAS.— (a) i 18 Each contract under which water is furnished through the 19 central Arizona aqueduct shall include provisions, adequate 20 in the judgment of the Secretary, (1) to restrict the delivery 21 of water to farms or ranches having a history of substantial 22 irrigation prior to June 3, 1963, (2) to limit the total serv- 23 ice area of projects to which such water is delivered, and 24 (3) to prevent expansion of areas irrigated from aquifers 22 1 replenished by projects receiving water from the central 2 Arizona aqueduct. 3 (b) The Secretary is authorized to require as a condi- 4 tion in any contract under which water is provided through 5 the central Arizona aqueduct that the contractor agree to 6 accept main stream water in exchange for or in replacement 7 of existing supplies from sources other than the main stream, 8 but no such exchange or replacement shall require a con- 9 tractor to bear any cost of said exchange or replacement 10 water in excess of the costs that would have been incurred 11 in connection with the continued use by the contractor of its 12 existing supply, nor shall such exchange or replacement 13 otherwise result in economic injury to the contractor. 14 SEC. 505. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.- 15 The appropriation of not to exceed $527,000,000 from the 16 development fund is authorized for the construction of the 1 17 central Arizona aqueduct and related facilities (including 18 Hooker Dam project in New Mexico) as described in this 19 title. 20 TITLE VI—DIXIE DIVISION 21 SEC. 601. AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION.—The 22 Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct, operate, 23 and maintain the Dixie project, Utah, herein referred to as 24 the Dixie division. The division shall consist of the Virgin 25 City Dam and Reservoir, tunnels, canals, siphons, pumping 23 1 plants, and other works necessary to serve irrigated and 2 irrigable lands along and adjacent to the Virgin River; a 4 3 dam on the Santa Clara River near Gunlock, Utah, and 4 other works necessary to serve irrigated and irrigable lands 5 along and adjacent to the Santa Clara River and on Ivins 6 Bench; and hydroelectric plants and transmission facilities 7 at the Virgin City Dam and at such other points as are 8 desirable. The area of lands not having a previous history i 9 of irrigation to be included in the division shall not exceed 10 twelve thousand acres. The Dixie division shall be coordi- I11 nated with the Cedar City water development program which 12 includes the diversion of the waters of Crystal Creek into the 13 Kolob Reservoir, and after completion of the Dixie division 14 said waters of Crystal Creek and of the natural watershed 15 of said Kolob Reservoir shall be exported for use of Cedar w 16 City and vicinity in accordance with an agreement entered I e 17 by Cedar City and Iron County, Utah, on the 2,6th day 18 of August 1953, with Kolob Reservoir and Storage Asso- 19 ciation, Incorporated, and Washington County, Utah. 20 SEc. 602. SALINE WATERS.—The Dixie division shall 21 include such facilities for the disposition of saline waters of 22 La Verkin Springs as are necessary in the opinion of the 23 Secretary to insure the delivery of water at downstream points 24 along the Virgin River for water users in the States of 25 Arizona and Nevada of suitable quality for irrigation, or pro- 24 1 vision shall be made to indemnify such water users for any 2 impairment of water quality for irrigation purposes directly 3 attributable to Dixie division operations. 4 SEC. 603. REQUIREMENT FOR CONSERVANCY DIS- 5 TRICT.—Construction of the Dixie division shall not be com- 6 menced until there shall be established a conservancy district 7 or similar organization with such powers as may be required 8 by the Secretary, these to include powers to tag both real 9 and personal property within the boundary of the district 10 and to enter into contracts with the United States for the 11 repayment of reimbursable costs. 12 SEC. 604. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.- 13 There is hereby authorized to be appropriated not to exceed 14 $45,000,000 for the construction of'the works authorized by 15 this title. i 16 TITLE VII—SOUTHERN NEVADA DIVISION 17 SEC. 701. SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER SUPPLY 18 PROJECT AUTHORIZED.{The Secretary of the Interior is 19 authorized to construct the southern Nevada water supply 20 project, Nevada, substantially as described in the Bureau. of 21 Reclamation's "Supplemental Information Report on South- 22 ern Nevada Water Supply Project, Nevada, January 1961", 23 subject to additions the cost of which shall not exceed 24 $9,000,000. 25 SEC. 702. CONTRACT WITII COLORADO COMMISSION 25 1 OF NEvADA REQUIRED.—The Secretary is authorized to 2 enter into a contract or contracts with the Colorado River ` 3 Commission of Nevada, acting for the State of Nevada, 4 whereby the United States will store and deliver water to 5 the commission pursuant to section 5 of the Boulder Canyon 6 Project. Act for use by the southern Nevada water supply 7 project, and that commission will operate and maintain the 8 project, and obligate itself to repay to the United States the 9 reimbursable portion of the construction cost thereof. Such 10 contract shall recognize such priorities among users as are 11 provided for in the laws of Nevada. Construction shall not 12 commence until the contract or contracts authorized by this 13 section have been executed. 14 ,SEC. 703. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR 15 CONSTRUCTION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER SUPPLY 16 PROJECT.—The appropriation of not to exceed $81,000,000 t 17 is hereby authorized for the construction of the southern 18 Nevada water supply project. I 19 SEC. 704. MOAPA VALLEY PUMPING PROJECT AU- 20 THORIZED.—The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 21 construct, operate, and maintain the Moapa Valley pumping 22 project, Nevada, substantially as described in the Bureau 23 of Reclamation's "Supplemental Information Report on 24 Moapa Valley Pumping Project, Nevada, January 1964". 25 The area of lands not having a previous history of irrigation 26 1 to be included in the project shall not exceed six thousand 2 acres. 3 SEC. 705. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR 4 CONSTRUCTION OF MOAPA VALLEY PUMPING PROJECT.- 5 The appropriation of not to exceed $12,000,000 for con- 6 struction of the Moapa Valley pumping project is hereby 7 authorized: Provided, That no money, other than for comple- g tion of investigations and preparation of a feasibility report, 9 shall be expended for the construction of the project until 10 sixty days after the Secretary shall have submitted to the 11 Congress a report showing that the project is feasible from 12 an engineering and economic viewpoint, and that the reim- 13 bursable costs, in his judgment, will be repaid to the United 14 States in conformity with this Act. 15 TITLE VIII—CONSERVATION DIVISION 1.6 SEC. 801. AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION, 17 OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE.—The Secretary of the 18 Interior is authorized to construct, operate, and maintain 19 necessary facilities for the salvage of water on the main 20 stream in the lower basin, including, but not limited to, 21 river channelization, the Senator Wash Reservoir, ground .22 water recovery facilities, and phreatophyte eradication and 23 control, substantially as described in the Bureau of Reclama- 24 tion's "Supplemental Information Report on Water Salvage i`• i� 27 1 Projects—Lower Colorado River-Arizona-California-Nevada, 2 January 1964". 3 , 'SEC. 802. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.- 4 The appropriation of not to exceed $42,000,000 is hereby 5 authorized from the development fund for the construction of 6 the ground water recovery facilities, and for phreatophyte 7 eradication and control, authorized by section 801. This 8 sum is in addition to authorizations heretofore enacted for 9 the appropriation of approximately $35,000,000 for river 10 channelization ,and of approximately $8,700,000 for con- 11 struction of Senator Wash Reservoir. 12 SEC. 803. CANAL LINING.—The Secretary is authorized 13 to enter into contracts with water users served by canals 14 heretofore constructed, to finance from the development fund 15 the lining of such canals and the installation of other water 16 conservation works, on terms mutually satisfactory to the i 17 s 1 Secretary and the water users affected with respect to the 18 disposition of the conserved water, and for reimbursement 19 of the cost thereof in accordance with the criteria stated in 20 this Act. 21 SEC. 804. STUDY AND RESEARCH.—It is the intention 22 of the Congress that accelerated and coordinated programs 23 of investigation, study, research, and planning shall be under- 24 taken to further the purposes of this Act, including, but not 28 1 limited to, potential sources of additional imported supplies 2 of water, conversion of saline and brackish waters, canal 3 sealants, evaporation reduction, weather modification, waste 4 water renovation, general hydrology, water quality and waste 5 management, water salvage, and fish and wildlife research. 6 The Secretary, in cooperation with the States and with the 7 Pacific Southwest Regional Water Commission, shall main- 8 taro a continuing review of the hydrology of the Colorado 9 River, ground water pumping, and projections of future water 10 supply and demand in the region, and report annually 11 thereon to the Congress. 12 TITLE IX—FISH AND WILDLIFE AND RECREA- 13 TION DIVISION 14 SEC. 901. CONSUMPTIVE USE OF WATER FOR PRO- 15 TECTION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE.—The Secretary of the 16 Interior is authorized to construct, operate, and maintain 17 facilities for the, utilization by the Havasu Wildlife Refuge 18 and the Imperial National Wildlife Refuge, in accordance 19 with article II (D) (8) and (9) of the decree of the 20 United States Supreme Court in Arizona against California 21 (373 U.S. 546 (1964) ) , of the quantities of water therein 22 authorized to be diverted or consumed, whichever is less, 23 upon the lands therein identified, and for the purposes stated 24 in Executive orders creating or regulating those refuges 25 issued prior to June 3, 1963. 29 1 SEC. 902. ADDITIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FACILI- 2 TrES.—The Secretary is authorized and directed to submit 3 to the Congress his report and recommendation for further 4 fish and wildlife conservation measures in the lower basin 5 of the Colorado River, to be undertaken either by the United 6 States or agencies of the States, with proposed methods of 7 financing them, and a statement of the quantities of con- 8 sumptive use of water involved by each, and methods of 9 supplying such water. 10 SEc. 903. RECREATION FACILITIES.—The Secretary is 11 authorized to construct, operate, and maintain, as part of the 12 projects authorized by this Act, public recreation facilities, 13 including access roads; to acquire or to withdraw from entry 14 or other disposition under the public land laws such adjacent 15 lands or interests therein as are necessary for present and x 16 future public recreation use; and to provide for public use 17 and enjoyment of the same and of the water areas of the Y 18 project. All of these undertakings shall be coordinated with 19 the other project purposes. The Secretary is authorized 20 to,enter into agreements with State or local public agencies 21 or other public entities for the operation, maintenance, or 22 additional development of project lands or facilities or to 23 dispose of project lands or facilities to State or local agen- 24 ties or other public entities by lease, transfer, exchange, or 25 conveyance, upon such terms and conditions as will best I 30 1 promote their development and operation in the public 2 interest for recreation purposes. 3 SEC. 904. AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATION.—The 4 appropriation of not to exceed $6,000,000 is hereby author- 5 ized for acquisition of lands and water rights, and construe- 6 tion of works, authorized by this title. Annual appropriations 7 for operation, maintenance, and provision for replacements 8 of such works, are hereby authorized. The amounts so ex- 9 pended, together with an appropriate share of joint costs of 10 projects in which works authorized by this title are included, 11 shall be nonreimbursable. 12 TITLE X—MAIN STREAM INDIAN RESERVATIONS 13 SEC. 1001. DECLARATION OF POLICY.—The Congress 14 declares its intention to make water available when and as 15 needed by those Indians who reside or may hereafter reside 16 on the Chemehuevi, Cocopah; Yuma, Colorado River, and 17 Fort Mohave Indian Reservations, in the quantities which i 18 article II (D) of the decree of the United States Supreme 19 Court in Arizona against California (373 U.S. 546 (1964) ) , 20 directs shall be released for use on those reservations. The 21 availability of water for use by non-Indians for the reclama- I 22 tion of lands on said reservations not having a history of 23 substantial irrigation prior to June 3, 1963, shall be subject 24 to the conditions stated in sections 1002 and 1003. 25 SEC. 1002. FURTHER LEASES TO NON-INDIANS FOR 31 1 THE IRRIGATION OF DESERT LANDS PROHIBITED UNTIL 2 SUPPLEMENTAL WATER IS IMPORTED INTO THE COLO- 3 RADo RIVER BASIN; COMPENSATION TO INDIANS.— (a) 4 The Secretary of the Interior shall postpone the execution of 5 further leases which would result in the reclamation or irriga- 6 tion of lands on the Chemehuevi, Colorado River, or Fort 7 Mohave Indian Reservations which do not have a history of 8 substantial irrigation prior to June 3, 1963 (except lands 9 to be occupied by Indians) , until such time as he shall deter- 10 mine that works have been constructed to import into the 11 Colorado River Basin, and are delivering, sufficient water to 12 enable the release of main stream water, thus augmented, to 13 satisfy on a permanent basis not less than the seven million 14 five hundred thousand acre-feet of annual consumptive 15 use in the States of Arizona, California, and Nevada, which 16 is apportioned by article II (B) (1) of the decree of the y 17 United States Supreme Court in Arizona against California 18 (373 U.S. 546 (1964) ) . 19 (b) During such time as paragraph (a) is operative, 20 the Secretary of the Interior shall pay currently out of the 21 development fund into the Indian funds in the Treasury into 22 which the postponed.lease rentals would be payable, amounts 23 equal to the sum of- 24 (i) the fair annual rental value of all lands on the 25 reservation in his opinion reasonably capable of irriga- 32 1 tion, but which he is prevented from leasing by the 2 operation of paragraph (a) , including the value of the 3 use of water thereon, to the full extent of the decreed 4 quantities of consumptive use as if works had been con- 5 structed to put such water to use, plus 6 (ii) appropriate annual installments of the cost of 7 reclaiming said lands and preparing them for irrigation, 8 including the cost of distribution works, plus 9 (iii) $1 per acre-foot of the decreed quantities of 10 consumptive use. 11 SEC. 1003. PAYMENTS FOR THL BENEFIT OF IN- 12 DIANS FOR INTERIM ITSE BY OTHERS OF WATER DECREED 13 TO INDIAN RESERVATIONS.—(a) Until such time as main 14 steam water, decreed for use on Indian reservations, is de- 15 termined by the Secretary to be needed for use by Indians 16 residing on those reservations, the Secretary is authorized to 17 temporarily lease to holders of Federal water storage and 18 delivery contracts in the same State the use of so much water 19 as is surplus to the requirements of the Indians, on the fol- 20 lowing conditions: 21 (1) The lease shall be subject to termination, with 22 out compensation to the lessee, on twelve months' notice, 23 and 24 (2) The compensation payable by the lessee shall 25 be whichever of the following amounts is determined U 33 1 by the Secretary to be the greater: (i) an amount de- 1 termined in accordance with section 1002.(b) , or (ii) 3 the annual value of the consumptive use of that same 4 quantity of water at the place of actual use, plus $1 per 5 acre-foot. of consumptive use. , Amounts so collected by l o 6 the Secretary shall be paid into the same funds into i 7 which the rentals of lands on the several reservations are .8 payable, and credited against the payments required by 9 2b section 100 ( ) . 10 (b) The Secretary is authorized to enter into supple- 11 mental agreements with the -non-Indian holders of existing 12 leases on the Indian reservations named in section 1001, 13 whereby the Secretary is empowered to suspend, on twelve 14 months' notice, the right of such lessees to use water for the 15 irrigation of lands not having a history of substantial irri- 16 gation before June 3, 1963, until the condition stated in 17 section 1002 (a) has been met, paying agreed compensation 18 to the lessees. 19 (c) In the event of suspension as provided in paragraph 20 (b) , the Secretary shall pay into the same fiends into which 21 the revenues of the canceled leases were payable for the 22 benefit of the Indians, amounts equal to those revenues, plus 23 the amounts, if any, which the lessees were .required by their 24 leases to expend in the reclamation of the leased land, includ- 25 ing construction of distribution works during the period of r 34 1 suspension, plus $1 per acre-foot of consumptive use. Such 2 payments shall not be diminished by the amounts that the 3 Secretary may be rewired to pay the lessees under para- 4 graph (b) of this section. 5 (d) Payments into Indian funds made under sections 6 1002 (b) and 1003 (c) shall be ,available for expenditure 7 by the Secretary for the reclamation of lands on the respec- 8 tive reservations, including construction of distribution works, 9 without further appropriation, as soon as the condition stated 10 in section 1002 (a) has been met. 11 SEC. 1004. REVIEW OF SECRETARY'S DETERMINATION 12 OF AMOUNTS BY TAIL++' COURT OF CLAIMS; ACCOUNTING 13 FOR PAYMENTS MADE FOR TIIE BENEFIT OF INDIANS.- 14 (a) If the governing body of the Indians resident on any 15 such reservation is dissatisfied with the revenues to accrue 16 for the benefit of said Indians pursuant to any determina- 17 tion made by the Secretary under this title, it may sue in 18 the Court of Claims for the determination of the proper 19 amounts, and jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the Court 20 of Claims to hear and adjudicate such suits. 21 (b) Payments made pursuant to this title shall be ac- 22 counted for as costs which are allocated to irrigation but are 23 to be repaid out of power revenues, as provided in section 24 203 (b) . a 25 �ii,:c. 1005. A TFI TTORTZATTON FOR APPROPRIATIONS.— 35 1 The appropriation from the development fund of not to ex- 2 ceed $10,000,000 is hereby authorized for the purpose of 'I 3 this title. i 4 TITLE XI—PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGIONAL 5 WATER COMMISSION 6 SEC. 1101. COMMISSION CREATED.- (a) 'There is here- 7 by created the Pacific Southwest Regional Water Commis- 8 sion (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") composed 9 of members to be appointed as follows: 10 (1) The Secretary of the Interior, or a deputy ap- 11 pointed by him, who shall serve as Chairman. 1.2 (2) One member representing each of the seven 13 States of the Colorado River Basin and each State in I 14 each river basin from which water would be imported 15 into the Colorado River Basin under any plan for im- 16 portation reported by the Secretary to Congress under 17 title III, each member to be appointed by the Governor 18 of the State. 19 (3) One member appointed by and representing i 20 each of the Secretaries of State; Agriculture; the Army; 21 Health, Education, and Welfare; and the Federal Power 22 Commission. 23 The compensation of each member shall be paid by the 24 entity appointing him. 25 (b) The functions of, the Commission shall be to— fi 36 1 (1) serve as the principal agency for the coordiva- 2 tion of further Federal, State, interstate, and local plans 3 for the conservation, augmentation, and beneficial utili- 4 zation of the water and related laird resources of the 5 Pacific Southwest; 6 (2) coordinate with State and Federal agencies 7 the preparation of a comprehensive, coordinated, joint 8 plan for the further Federal, State, interstate, and local 9 development of the water and related land resources of the 10 region: Provided, That the plan may include alternatives 11 and it may be prepared and submitted in stages, includ- 12 ing recommendations with respect to individual projects; 13 (3) recommend long-range schedules of priorities 14 for the collection and analysis of basic data and for 15 investigation, planning, and construction of projects; and 16 (4) advise and counsel the appropriate Federal 17 and State agencies on such studies of water resources 18 and related land resources in the region as are necessary 19 in the preparation of the plan prescribed in clause (2) 20 of this subsection. 21 (c) In carrying out the provisions of this Act, the 22 Commission may- 23 (1) employ and compensate such personnel as it 24 deems advisable; 25 (2) use the United States mails in the same manner 37 1 and upon the same conditions as departments and agen- 2 cies of the United States; 3 (3) acquire, furnish, and equip such office space 4 as is necessary; 5 (4) accept for any of its purposes and functions 6 appropriations, donations, and grants of money, equip- 7 ment, supplies, materials, and services from any State 8 or the United States or any subdivision or agency thereof, 9 or intergovernmental agency, and receive, utilize, and 10 dispose of the same; and 11 (5) incur such necessary expenses and exercise such 12 other powers as are consistent with and reasonably 13 required'to perform its functions under this section. 14 (d) The Commission shall determine the proportionate 15 share of its expense which shall be borne by the Federal 16 Government and each of the States. The Commission shall 17 prepare a budget annually and transmit it to the Federal 18 departments and the States. Estimates of proposed appro- priations from the Federal Government shall be included in 20 the budget estimates submitted by the Secretary of the in- 21 terior under the Budgeting and Accounting Act of 19`-11 , 22 as amended, and may include an amount for.advance to the 23 Commission against State appropriations for which delay is 24 anticipated by reason of later legislative sessions. All suins 25 appropriated or otherwise received by the Commission shall 38 1 be credited to the Commission's account in the Treasury of 2 the United States. 3 SEC. 1102. AUTIIORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS.- 4 The appropriation of not to exceed $500,000 annually as the 5 Federal contribution to the operating expenses of the Coni- 6 mission is hereby authorized. Sums so appropriated shall 7 not be reimbursable. 8 TITLE XII—GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE 9 TO THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND 10 MAINTENANCE OF ALL WORKS AUTHORIZED 11 BY THIS ACT 12 SEC. 1201. RECLAMATION LAWS.—This Act shall be 13 deemed a supplement to the reclamation laws (Act of June 14 17, 1902, and Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary 15 thereto) , which shall govern the construction, operation, 16 and maintenance of all works authorized by this Act, except 1, as otherwise specifically provided. 18 SEC. 1202. DEFINITIONS.—As used in this Act: 19 (a) "Pacific Southwest" and "region" shall mean the 20 drainage basin of the Colorado River in the United States 21 from Lee Ferry to the lower Mexican 'border, plus Cali- 22 fornia counties (i) in which Colorado River waters are 23 presently used and (ii) from which waters may be exported 24 by works constructed under title III. 25 (b) "User" or "water user" in relation to Colorado 39 1 River main stream water means a person or legal entity 2 having a right pursuant to the Boulder Canyon Project Act 3 or other applicable Federal law to use main stream water 4 when available under the decree of the Supreme Court of 5 the United States in Arizona against California (373 U.S. 6 546 (1964) ) . 7 (c) All terms defined in article I of the said decree of 8 the United States Supreme Court shall have the meanings 9 there defined when used in this Act. 10 SEC. 1203. SECRETARY REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO 11 LAW OF THE RIVER; CONSENT TO SUIT.— (a) In the stor- 12 age and delivery of water originating in the Colorado River 13 Basin, the Secretary is directed to comply with the applicable 14 provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the Upper Colo- 15 rado River Basin Compact, the Boulder Canyon Project Act, 16 the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act, the treaty with 17 the United Mexican States, and the decree of the United 18 States Supreme Court in Arizona against California (373 19 U.S. 546 (1964) ) , and to comply with the laws of the 20 States in which water is distributed insofar as the laws of 21 these States respectively relate to use and distribution of 22 water therein, including intrastate priorities. In the event 23 of the failure of the Secretary of the Interior to so comply, 24 any affected State of the Colorado River Basin may maintain 25 an action in the Supreme Court of the United States to en- 40 1 force the provisions of this section and consent is given to 2 the joinder of the United States as a party in such suits, as 3 a defendant or otherwise. 4 (b) Nothing in this Pict shall be construed to alter, 5 amend, interpret, or modify any provisions of the laws, treaty, 6 compacts, or the decree referred to in paragraph (a) . o � CD c� ° o m ° 7J � yCDx � CD C y ron o �+ Ci " CD y r 'y C9 CD C � � i i 1 City of Huntingtoneach Califomia July 14, 1964 Honorable Senator Clair Engle Honorable Assemblyman James E. Whetmore Honorable Assemblyman. William E. Dannep.eyer Honorable Senator Thomas Kuchel Honorable Representative James B. Utt Honorable Representative Richard T. Hanna Dear. . . . . . The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held Monday, July 6, 1964, passed and adopted Resolution No. 2014, endorsing Orange County Water District's Resolution No. 828 supporting the Pacific Southwest Project Act, Senate Bill 2760. The Council directed that a copy of Resolution No. 2014 be forwarded to you and urges your support of Senate Bill 2760. ' Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:tr „;. Enc: Res. #2014 t� y IN6foa� City of Huntington Beach � Q Califomia July 14, 1964 Orange County Wafer District 1629 Wett Seventeenth Street Santa Ana, Califorhia Attention: Mr, Howard W. Crooke Secretary Manager Gentlemen: Attached hereto is a copy of Resolution No. 2014 which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Cityof Huntington Beach .at their regular meeting held Monday, .July 6, 1964. This Resolution supports yofir stand in regard to the Pacific Southwest Project Act, Senate Bill 2760. Copies. of this Resolution have also been sent to the State and Federal Legislators. Sincerely yours, Paul C, Jones City Clerk PCJ: tr Enc: Res. #2014 COMMITTEE ON DISTRICT OFFICE: BANKING AND CURRENCY JOHN BEEKMAN RICHARD T. HANNA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE 34TH DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1695 W.CRESCENT,SUITE 510 SUBCOMMITTEES: , ANAHEIM,CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC FINANCE %onareoo of the Mufteb *tate� PHONE:776-6850 CONSUMER AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE TCA WASHINGTON OFFICE: Noma of Reprezentatfba WILLIAM A.BUTCHER SELECT SUBCOMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TOURISM AND TRAVEL leastington, 0. C. 1516 HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING August 11, 1964 City Council City of Huntington Beach c/o City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear City Councilmen: I have today introduced a companion bill to one introduced in the Senate by both Senator Kuchel and Senator Salinger of California, seeking to find a broad solution to the problems of the Colorado River and its water allotments. I had not previously introduced similar legislation for the reason that the approach sought failed to take into account the position of the upper basin users and the clearly demonstrated primary problem of substantially increasing the gradually dwindling water supply in the north Colorado River basin. The bill introduced today is one which, rather than apportioning scarcity, seeks for a realistic augmentation. There are sources in the northwest where water is being wasted which could be tapped to replenish the insufficient supply envisioned in the Colorado River. It does appear to me that this approach will have the necessary total western support required for a successful bill. It appears also to have the support of all knowledgeable water agencies. The bill assures protection of California's present 4,400,000 acre feet per year delivery and at the same time does not cut off the rightful expectations of either Arizona or the country of Mexico. City Council of Huntington Beach August 11, 1964 Page 2 I join both California Senators in the statement that this new bill provides a vehicle for getting on with the building of the west for benefit of all without raising hazards for any. With all best wishes, I remain You sincerely, Za d4l RICHARD T. HANNA United States Congressman RTH:agb a � 88Tx CONGRESS 2D,,SESSION O O IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AUGUST 11,1964 Mr. HANNA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Com- mittee on Interior and Insular Affairs I ILL To authorize investigations .and reports on the water resources ,and requirements of the Colorado River Basin, and to pro- tect existing economies in the course of development, of such resources. I Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tines of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. INVESTI'GATIONS OF WATER REQUIRE- 4 MENTS AND POTENTIAL SOURCES OF SUPPLY.— (a) The 5 Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to inves- 6 tigate and report to the Congress— (1) the quantities of water which must be added to S the main stream of the Colorado River in order to assure 9 a dependable supply adequate to avoid a shortage in the, I F 2 I seven million five hundred thousand acre-feet per annum 2 of consumptive use of main stream water which is ap- 3 portioned among the States of Arizona, California, and 4 Nevada by article II (B) (1) , of the decree of the 5 United States Supreme Court in Arizona against Cali- 6 forma, and others, and 7 (2) the additional quantities of water which must 8 be added to the main stream of the Colorado River in 9 order to assure a dependable supply adequate to sustain 10 the economies in Arizona, California, and Nevada which 11 are now dependent, or will become dependent in the 12 foreseeable future, upon the main stream as a major 13 source of their water supply. . 14 (b) The quantities referred to in paragraph (a) shall 15 be so estimated as to: 16 (1) provide for water requirements of the proposed 17 central Arizona project, subject, however, to section 2 18 of this Act; 19 (2) avoid reduction or delay in the development 20 of uses of water in the upper basin in conformity with 21 the Colorado River compact. i 22 (c) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and 23 directed to investigate and report to the Congress the alter- 24 nate sources from which water may be obtained in sufficient 25 quantities to satisfy the requirements specified in paragraph I ' (a) , together with cost estimates, preliminary plans, 2 financing methods, and recommendations for legislation to 3 authorize construction of projects to furnish water in the i4 required quantities. Such sources of water shall include, but 5 not be limited to: salvage operations on the main stream; 6 'canal lining and other conservation measures; ground water - 7 recovery; desalinization of sea water and brackish:waters 8 weather modification.; and importation of water from.other 9 watersheds. Plans for importation of water from other water- it - 10 sheds shall in all cases include adequate and equitable provi- I 11 sions for the ultimate requirements of the States and areas 12 of origin of those waters. 13 (d) The Secretary shall submit to the Congress annual 14 progress reports with respect to the investigations directed. 15 . by this Act, and shall submit his final report and recom 16 mendations not later than three years after the date of 17 enactment hereof. 18 (e) The appropriation of not to exceed $10,000,000, _1.9 to remain available until expended, is hereby authorized for 20 the purposes of this section. 21 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF EXISTING ECONOMIES.= (a) 22 In the administration of article II (b) (3) of the.decree of, 23 the United States Supreme Court in Arizona against Cali 24 forma, all rights to the consumptive use of water to be 25" diverted by or for the central Arizona aqueduct from the 4 1 main stream of the Colorado River shall be junior to all of 2 the .following senior existing rights to waters of the main 3.,, stream, -including all present perfected rights: Rights of 4 water users served under contracts with the United States .5 by diversion works heretofore constructed, and decreed rights °6 -of Federal reservations, in Arizona and Nevada; and such -7 rights' in California to the aggregate annual consumptive 8 . use of four million four hundred thousand acre-feet of water 9 of the-main stream of the Colorado River. 10 (b)- Shortages shall be first borne by the junior rights 11 of users in Arizona served by the central Arizona aqueduct 12 before any shortages shall be borne by any of the senior 13 existing rights recognized above: Provided, That this section 14 shall not affect the relative priorities, among themselves, of 15 :.water rights in Arizona, California., and Nevada which are 16 -senior to rights served by the central Arizona aqueduct, or 17 amend any provision of the decree of the Supreme Court of 18:' he United States in Arizona against California. 19" ` (c) In the event that the Congress shall hereafter 20 authorize the importation of water from other watersheds 21;, into the main stream of the Colorado River, the United" 22 States shall have the right to satisfy any right to the use 23' : of water from the main stream in the lower basin, in whole 24 or in part,. by substituting delivery of water so imported,- 25 during such ;time as the substituted supply is actually de-' 1 livered on terms not less favorable to the water user with 2 respect to quantity, dependability of supply, quality, cost, 3 time and place of delivery, than the terms upon which that 4 user's Colorado River supply would be available. To the 5 extent that rights senior to those served by the central G Arizona project are thus satisfied by delivery of imported 7 water, the Secretary may deliver Colorado River water to 8 or by means of the central Arizona project which this section 9 would otherwise require to be delivered to the holders of. 10 senior rights. 88Ta CONGRESS �. R. 12335 �D SLr66ION 1 A BILL To authorize investigations and reports on the water resources and requirements of the 1 Colorado River Basin, and to protect exist- ing economies in the course of development of such resources. i By Mr. HANNA AuGuST 11, 1964 Referred to the Committee on Interior and Insular AWN August 4, 1965 U S. Army Corps of Engineers Thomas H. Kuchel George Murphy Richard T. Manna John G. Schmitz Fames E. Whhetmore Robert E. Badham The Honorable William E. Danneymeyer 329 South magnolia Anaheim, California 92604 Dear Sir: Enclosed herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2221 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, supporting the location and construction of the off-shore desalinization plant, as recommended by the engineers of the Bechtel Corporation. Said Resolution was adopted at their regular meeting held Monday, August 2, 1965 . The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach respect- fully requests your support of the recommendation of the, Bechtel Corporation engineers in the o6f-shore location of the desalinisation plant near Sunset Beach. Yours very truly, Paul C. gones City Clergy y: Deputy PCJ:ed:aw Enc. SOLUTION No, 2221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SUPPORTING THE LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE OFFSHORE DESALINIZATION PLANTs AS RECOMMENDED BY p' THE (ENGINEERS OF THE BECHTEL CORPORATION WHEREAS, the U• S. Corps of Army Engineers has studied, 0 the eventual looation of. a nuclear desalinization plant along the Pacific Coastj and v yf: WHERZAS , the site to be selected for the Installation of such desalinisation plant is of the utmost Importemmce to 4 the City of Huntington Bea , NOW, THEREFORE9, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of A the City of Huntington Beach that it is an record In fully supporting the loeation'and construction of the offshore dasela Inization plant on an Island conatruoted off the " Ific Coast in the vicinity of Suabet Besohs qs recommended by the Engineers of the Bechtel Corporation, to be the most suitable and most somomical location for sold project. s BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that tho City Council. of the City, of Huntington Beach will lend to this project, whatever nape i • port is required, which ip within their power so to' de. ' BE IT. ER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the C11ty, . of Huntington Bach, following the passage of this reselutleao 't M Is hereby direstod to send a copy thereof to the U.S*. Corps -' r of Army Engineers, U.S. Senater George Hurphys , Smater Th=wn '• ' � H. Eu el, Representative Richard T.• � Hannso -SteN t® Sonabbr Jobs, J. Schmitz and Assemblymen James E. Atmore, Robert . Beldheim v l and William E. Dannepayer. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City dx of Huntington Beseh, California, this 2nd day of AuguatD14650 4%TTESTs C L, city e Ap AS TO OBKs .G .. City Attorney u fi ' k l e j STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ®range s® City of Huntington Beaf; 4 9 j I, PAUL C. JONES$ the duly elootede guelift4d ; I and acting City Clark of the City of Huntington Eesch® MA emoffiolo Clerk of the City Co ail of sold City do here serti f y that the whole number of members of said City Council, of the City of Huntington Beach is five; that the foregoingµ�� ". resolution was se op by the affirmative rote of more than a majority of all the ambers of said City � r Council at ® regular meeting thereof hold an the 2nd der Of August w 1965* All } ': Welch, Gisler, Stevart,., Lambert., ipley e ES$ Councilment l Nome } . ti t Counallmens .� . rz None • eM 'F C'Jerk and a ® r City Council o the City of Hunt :. Beach, California iri; p3 TEL No .7147816288 Jan 3 ,90 13 :21 No .003 P . 04 California Regional Water Quality Control Hoard Santa Ana Region fiso9 Indiana avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92506 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HFARING and AppL:rcATION FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit) f or the Shell western M&P Inc. , Platform "E32xy10 Pacific Ocean, Orange County Shell W*atern ElkP Inc_ has applied for waste discharge r qui.rements for =ntinuing the discharge of drilling mud and drill cuttings aid asani.tary wastes from- platform "ZzUyR to the Pacific ocean. on the basis of preliminary staff raview and application of lawful standards and regulations, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, * tentatively proposes to issue waste discharge requirements including effluent limitations and special conditions. Persons wishing to coxment upon or object to the proposed discharge requirements are invited to submit same in writing to the above address no later than January 19, 1990. All comwnts or objections received p:cior to the above chats will be COnSid-erred in the formulation of final determinations regarding the waste discharge. The ward wishes to obtain information to assist it in determining Proper waste discharge requirements and,, for that purpose, will hold a public hearing as f of l suers: DATE: February 9, 1990 T 9;00 a.m. PLACE: City Council ChAmber's 3900 Main Street Riverside, California Interested persons ala invited to mind to express their views on these issues relatinsj to the above waste discharge. Persons making presentatiQzrs should• confine their statements to the above stated issues. oral at-at ants will be heard, but, for the accuracy of the record, all important testimony should be submitted in writing. oral stat-ements should be brief to allow all interested person time to be heard. , The report of waste discharge, related docents, staff report, the Board's proposed requirements, and all cowaents and petitions received may be i.nspect�--d and copied at the Regional Board office, 6809 Indiana Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, CA 92506 (phone 714-782-4131)} by appointment scbedu-l.ed between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:OQ p.m. , Xonda.y through Thursday. - - Please bring the foregoing to the attention of any persons known to you who would be interested in this latter. RC-mvvE alie 190 n� 7� 9# ; j� s �r i a 1„ v , a t � im HISTORY The Orange County Municipal Water the possibility of joining Metropolitan. District was formed on January 11, 1951, Later, the Orange County Farm under authority of the Municipal Water Bureau assumed the committee's activi- ,f District Act of 1911. ties, and included the needs of other com- # ' '* 3 � The District's formation rounded out munities in its expanded studies. The an aggressive program in Orange County Metropolitan concept was that one to supply imported water to all consum- agency could more efficiently and eco- m ers within the District's boundaries, and nomically supervise an imported water keep pace with the future needs of a program rather than several small .. µ rapidly expanding population. agencies. The area's water problems were first Ultimately, the Orange County Munic- identified in the early 1920 s when con- ipal Water District was formed. In cern was voiced by water experts that November, 1951,the District annexed to local sources of water in Southern Cali- Metropolitan and was soon receiving fornia were being depleted and under- Colorado River water. ground water alone would be insufficient At the end of the first fiscal year of to handle population growth projections. operation the District had an assessed valuation of $275 million and served an In 1941 the Colorado River Aqueduct, estimated population of 110,000 living in constructed by Metropolitan Water an area of 355 square miles. Today, the District of Southern California with assessed valuation has swelled to more funds from a $220 million bond issue, than$3 billion, and more than 1.2 million began delivering water to three Orange people are served in an area of 604 square County cities, Anaheim, Santa Ana and miles. Fullerton. In 1969 the District changed its name This same year the Coastal Municipal to the Municipal Water District of Water District was formed to purchase Orange County, and as such, continues to imported water to replace well water serve its 37 constituent members with a degraded by the intrusion of sea water high degree of dedication, careful plan- along the Orange County coast from ning and efficient management. Newport Beach to San Clemente. The completion of the State Water It soon became evident that many other Project will permit delivery of surplus areas of Orange County would require Northern California water to Orange additional water supply, and early in County, which will enable Municipal to 1949 representatives of Orange, Seal enter a new era of water service that will Beach, Huntington Beach, Placentia and carry Orange County well into the 21st La Habra formed a committee to study Century. 1 3 DISTRIBUTION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND COLORADO RIVER WATER TO ORANGE COUNTY USERS State Water Northern Project California Dept.of Water Water Resources THE 4� WATER INDUSTRY Metropolitan Water Colorado The Municipal Water District of District of River Southern Water Orange County is an integral part of a California large, complex water industry that provides flood control, groundwater management and imported water for the benefit of Orange County citizens. These water resources are managed by Municipal Prange Orange three local organizations whose expertise Water Flood County County District of Natural in local matters insures Orange County's Orange Water Control Runoff private consumers of optimum service. County District District The Municipal Water District of Orange County serves 80 percent of the county by importing water and passing it along to 37 constituent agencies which serve a population of more than 1.2 Retail Replenish million. Water Ground Agencies Water The Orange County Flood Control Dis- Basin trict, with more than 300 miles of flood protection channels, conserves both flood waters and natural runoff for replenish- ing the county's underground basins. The Orange County Water District, which serves 40 percent of the county, Consumer Waste replenishes the groundwater basin by Water spreading both natural and imported waters, and combats seawater intrusion by injecting fresh water into coastal groundwater basins. 2 FUNCTION It is the function of the Municipal STATISTICAL HISTORY OF MUNICIPAL WATER Water District of Orange County to DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY supply water to 80 percent of Orange County's total'area and 80 percent of the MWDOC total population. Water Fiscal Assessed Area' Estimated2 Deliveries Municipal performs this task by pur- Year Valuation Sq.Mile Population Acre Ft. chasing imported water from the Metro- 1951-52 $ 275,121,480 355 110,000 - politan Water District of Southern 1952-53 275,123,410 355 125,000 - California and selling it at wholesale to 1953-54 282,720,070 355 137,000 45,349 Orange County cities and water agencies. 1954-55 319,375,800 355 173,000 70,178 They, in turn, sell the water to the 1955-56 362,618,640 355 232,000 25,533 ultimate consumer. 1956-57 465,157,840 355 300,000 104,935 Municipal is also involved in the over- 1957-58 562,497,480 366 338,000 93,247 all planning of major water supply facil- 1958-59 643,880,810 405 370,000 100,915 ities to meet the growing water demands 1959-60 714,950,030 436 395,000 181,893 of Orange County. 1960-61 805,776,510 450 405,000 212,074 Municipal serves all of Orange County 1961-62 925,244,990 503 450,000 211,319 with the exception of the Cleveland 1962-63 1,051,958,010 503 512,000 280,39T National Forest, the Coastal Municipal 1963-64 1,206,432,264 503 620,000 242,776 Water District and portions of Anaheim, 1964-65 1,396,126,480 568 640,000 204,880 Santa Ana and Fullerton. 1965-66 1,626,438,180 568 700,000 175,164 The District is active in the field of 1966-67 1,820,297,450 568 968,700 170,101 public information. Municipal sponsors 1967-68 2,145,322,470 568 998,000 150,702 tours of the Robert B. Diemer Filtration 1968-69 2,334,097,610 568 1,071,400 120,077 Plant,Lake Mathews,the Colorado River 1969-70 2,435,869,020 568 1,122,700 186,753 Aqueduct System and the State Water 1970-71 2,841,273,711 568 1,149,500 159,860 Project. 1971-72 3,210,334,108 604 1,247,100 160,082 Key District personnel are available Area computed by MWDOC does not include ocean portion. to speak at schools, service clubs, civic 2Population estimated by MWDOC since 1966-67 includes MWDOC portions of Anaheim, organizations and water groups.The Dis- Fullerton and Santa Ana. trict has a broad assortment of brochures describing the water supply facilities in Southern California and Orange County, and a special sound film that can be loaned to accredited groups. 3 CONSTITUENT AGENCIES OF MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Vk trice Coastal Municipal Water District City of Brea QUt n. jp5 .l of Fullerton a nle � C ornta Water � antis o Co my Water eM tslri C mpany ',,, District Saola��,Nale<D FutiFrrox Gwn `El Toro Company,1 City of Orang00 { AXANFIM I{{7(7 O £� i3�p 3 G city of City of � c . .� o Buena Park h im � ''3 i� eA•i SANFA ANA � City of Irvine Ranch Garden Grove s Water District s City of La Palma - Coastal Municipal Water r N, District Moulton-Niguel Water tmA stet egp e `° District City qi es City of tt` e� Santa Ana"Heights Water Orange County Fountain 0�'��3 Company . Waterworks Coastal Municipal Water 6ify of Huntington Beach District DOTTED LINE—ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT DASHED LINE—THE IRVINE COMPANY ALL COLORED AREAS ARE WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE GRAY AREAS 4 WATER USERS In Orange County more than 1.2 mil- Ions were used to replenish the under- CONSTITUENT AGENCIES lion people use the water imported by ground water supply. Municipal Water District of Orange These figures represent more than 51 ®f the County.The water is physically delivered billion gallons purchased by Municipal MUNICIPAL. WATER to these people by 11 cities and 26 water during fiscal year 1970-71. This repre- DISTRICT OF agencies. sents 70 percent of all water consumed in 4 ORANGE COUNTY During fiscal year 1970-71 Municipal Orange County during this period, and delivered 27 billion gallons of domestic was one-sixth of all the water imported City of Anaheim water to its 37 constituent members. into Southern California by Metropolitan City of Brea Another 6 billion gallons were delivered Water District of Southern California City of Buena Park for agricultural use, and 18 billion gal- for that year. City of Fountain Valley City of Garden Grove City of Huntington Beach City of La Habra City of La Palma City of Orange CONSTITUENT MEMBER AGENCIES City of Seal Beach Of the City of Westminster METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Anaheim Union Water Company Carpenter Irrigation District IN ORANGE COUNTY Collier Carbon&Chemical Corp. Costa Mesa County Water District City Area Assessed East Orange County Water District Member's Area in MWDOC Estimated Valuation El Toro Company Agency Sq.Mile %of Total Sq.Mile %of Total Population ($1,000,000) El Toro Water District Anaheim 4.45 0.6 31.77 87.7 22,600 96.0 Grant Corporation The Irvine Company Fullerton 16.78 2.4 5.32 24.1 67,300 196.5 Irvine Ranch Water District Los Alisos Water District Santa Ana 10.82 1.6 16.33 60.1 67,800 191.5 Moulton-Niguel Water District Nobar Water Company County of Orange Coastal Orange County Water District Municipal Orange County Waterworks District#4 Water Rancho Santa Ana District 53.47 7.8 — — 160,300 645.8 Santa Ana Heights Water Company Santa Ana Mountains County Water Municipal District Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Company Water Santa Margarita Water District District Santiago County Water District of Orange Serrano Irrigation District County 604.00 87.6 — — 1,247,000 3,210.3 Southern California Water Company Walnut Canyon Mutual Water Company Yorba Linda County Water District 5 DIEMER FILTRATION PLANT After Colorado River water reaches Lake Mathews it must begin another journey of more than 225 miles before it reaches all of the customers served by --- Municipal Water District of Orange County. The first leg of this journey covers a � r� g distance of 24 miles from Lake Mathews v , to the Robert B. Diemer Filtration Plant on a hill overlooking Yorba Linda. One of the largest water treatment plants in the United States, this facility was com- pleted in 1963 at a cost of almost $30 p millio ®� Robert B.Diemer Filtration Plant Originally designed for a treatment capacity of 200 million gallons a day, a two-year expansion program, completed = in 1969, doubled this capacity to 400 million gallons. Water, gravity fed through a pipeline, flows into Diemer where it .is metered, chlorinated and, when necessary, coagu- lation aids are added to assist in the removal of suspended matter. It then Filtration Facilities flows into eight, six-million gallon basins where huge paddles mix the chemicals thoroughly with the water. Coagulated sediments settle to the bottom and are Underground Reservoir Release Gates removed by mechanical sludge sweeps. The water is then filtered through , layers of granulated anthracite, an r` extremely hard form of coal that is � nearly pure carbon, and finely graded � sand.It is chlorinated again before enter- ing the-huge 7-million gallon concrete underground storage reservoir. At this point, the clean and sparkling pure water has undergone repeated tests a by chemists, and is ready for release into the more than 200 miles of transmission lines serving Orange County. 6 WATER SOURCE Colorado River water begins its jour- Havasu and its terminal reservoir,Lake crete conduits, 29 miles of inverted sigh- ney to Orange County above Parker Dam Mathews near Riverside. Including its ons, three reservoirs and 321 miles of at Lake Havasu, an exciting and beauti- distribution network, the system has a high-voltage power lines. ful 39-square-mile water recreational total length of more than 700 miles. In 1955 the American Society of Civil area. The main aqueduct has five pumping Engineers selected the Colorado River Metropolitan's Colorado River Aque- plants, which lift the water a total of Aqueduct as one of the Seven Modern duct spans 242 miles of desert and moun- 1,617 feet; 92 miles of tunnels, 63 miles Civil Engineering Wonders of the United tain ranges between its intake at Lake of concrete-lined canals, 55 miles of con- States. The aqueduct system now represents an investment of about$500 million and ANNEXATIONS TO MUNICIPAL has a replacement value of $1 billion. The use of Colorado River water has WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY risen steadily in recent years. During the Totals Area District 1969-70 fiscal year the aqueduct deliv- Identification Date Sq.Mile Sq.Mile ered 1,214,105 acre-feet, or one billion Original MWDOC 1/11/51 355 355 gallons a day to Southern California. Annex. No. 1 11/25/57 11 366 Metropolitan's contract with the State Annex. No. 4 12/11/58 39 405 of California calls for the import of Annex. No. 5 12/ 7/59 31 436 2,011,500 acre-feet of water a year,or 1.8 Annex. No. 7 12/ 8/60 14 450 billion gallons a day,of surplus Northern Annex. No. 10 12/11/61 53 503 California water via the State Water Annex. No. 11 1/ 6/64 0.27 503 Project Aqueduct. An acre-foot is a vol- Annex. No. 8A 3/29/65 11 514 ume of water one foot deep covering one Annex. No. 8B 3/29/65 8 522 acre, or 326,000 gallons. Annex. No. 8C 3/29/65 9 531 Water will be brought 450 miles to Annex. No. 8D 3/29/65 6 537 Southern California from the Delta of Annex. No. 8E 3/29/65 7 544 the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers Annex. No. 8F 3/29/65 8 552 through a complex system of giant dams, Annex. No. 8G 3/29/65 8 560 reservoirs, pumps, canals, tunnels and Annex. No. 8H 3/29/65 8 568 pipelines. The initial delivery of this Annex. No. 13 6/30/69 0.13 568 water to Municipal Water District of Annex. No. 15 9/ 1/72 1 569 Orange County for use as underground Annex. No. 16 9/11/72 35 604 replenishment began in 1973. The deliv- Based on calculation of area by MWDOC.Does not include ery of this water for direct use by Munic- ocean portion. ipal's constituent members will start in 2Total area rounded to nearest square mile. January, 1976. 7 ter. a i t a a � i it kl � � V�a F s I�"AKEM4THEW5,. s � i 8 o "�'�Yorba Linda Feeder '. I vil COASTILB. BD pPr \ , '" � �, Lam Robert B Dismar L E V Of ORBA LINDA HAT f" PLAC TIA IBVI EPARK OPaaaPNa \ F U @ N T/ \ �< LA HABRA s VILLA PARK OUVE W W uxT.Bo c.xrox No•o EL NOOENA �- �` LEMON NEIG P� NCIB! ORANGE FRE,wA, HAN BUENA PARK spa SANiA �xi � 1 • u ARDEN GROVE � ?n 8 �, � �.,�,a 'l ♦,de' +�BTAN Tri-Citlea Tr ulon Main `�� CYP epG' r� °rsG♦° LaOuno C � g yGo n darn Transmission Main g ♦ •a� WESTMINSTER a IRVIN LOB ALAMITOS e� A ,—COASTAL B.W. 0. MOUNTAIN VALLEY SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO San Joaquin Reservoir ♦a " C TA ME NEWPORT BEACH OONON nn. ��t� IA TA MICIMI Coaet P IIn�TfR DISTRICT N iN "�'� MUNTI TON BEACH sT _ � �� BEAL BEACN UHT NOTOM NAREOUR •.' e� ��. � N W�v ,�g���,� � �- �{.� � � .� S �" - �lAGUNA BEACH.r � �CAPISTRAN9 eEAcx' re '�ce: m � , s ® - COASTAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT �sx EXISTING TRANSMISSION MAINS — —PROPOSED TRANSMISSION MAINS 9 MAJOR TRANSMffSSffON UN ES The first pipeline constructed in heim Lake) for use as groundwater constructed by the Tri-Cities Municipal Orange County to carry imported Colo- replenishment. Water District under a joint powers M rado River water was the Orange County Increasing water needs, particularly agreement between Tri-Cities, Moulton- Feeder. Completed in 1941 to serve Santa in the southwestern areas of Orange Niguel Water District, Irvine Ranch Ana,Anaheim and Fullerton,the line had County,prompted annexations to Munic- Water District and Municipal. the capacity to serve additional areas of ipal in 1957. By 1958 several agencies The second line, the Eastern Trans- central Orange County. had joined with Municipal to construct mission Main, was constructed by the The line was constructed between the the East Orange County Feeder No. 2 Moulton-Niguel Water District to serve Weymouth Filtration Plant in La Verne and the Santiago Aqueduct. The two new its consumers and those in Orange and Santa Ana. It was extended to facilities were designed to reinforce the County Waterworks District No. 4. Corona del Mar in 1944 after Coastal Orange County Feeder and provide The Santiago Aqueduct, also opera- Municipal Water District annexed to the improved service for the enlarging tional in 1962, was constructed under the Metropolitan Water District of Southern Municipal District. terms of a joint powers agreement California. The East Orange County Feeder No. 2, between Municipal, Los Alisos and El When Municipal Water District of operational in 1964, was constructed by Toro Water Districts. Water was Orange County annexed to Metropolitan the cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana, obtained from the Santiago Lateral to in 1951, Metropolitan agreed to provide and the Coastal, Metropolitan and Muni- service consumers within the three additional transmission facilities to both cipal Water Districts as a joint powers districts. eastern and western areas of the county. project. In 1964, again looking ahead, Munic- These facilities included the Santiago San Joaquin Reservoir, operated by ipal conducted studies of the total water Lateral in the east, and the West Orange Metropolitan, was constructed by the supply needs of Orange County, giving County Feeder in the west. Irvine Ranch Water District as a ter- particular attention to the ability of Between 1956-60 three transmission minal reservoir for East Orange County existing feeders to supply anticipated lines were completed to serve Municipal's Feeder No. 2 and to provide regulatory deliveries. Investigations also involved consumer area—The West Orange storage for coastal area water users. the proposed Second Lower Feeder and County Feeder,the Lower Feeder and the Two years earlier, in 1962, the East the Yorba Linda Feeder. The two pro- Santiago Lateral. Orange County Feeder No. 2 was suf- posed feeders, under construction by d The East Orange County Feeder was ficiently constructed to permit the Metropolitan,are part of the distribution completed in 1961 to deliver water operation of two more transmission lines. system for delivery of water from the from Diemer to the Crill Basin (Ana- The Tri-Cities Transmission Main was State Water Project. 10 x�e � oy ZV ` ------------ A e r Because of farsighted thinking, the ±` aqueduct was built large enough to serve r11 1 N the needs of future generations, and for- tunately, the aqueduct became a reality In November, 1928, the Metropolitan at almost the precise moment this Water District of Southern California country's largest human migration began became a public and municipal corpora- flooding California. tion.Its purpose?To provide an adequate Today, Metropolitan serves a popula- '°� === water supply to meet the present and tion of more than 10,000,000 covering an future needs of the entire coastal area of area of almost 4,800 square miles extend- Southern California. ing into Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, $ Among the 13 cities representing the San Bernardino, San Diego and Ventura original Metropolitan District in Orange, counties. Its assessed valuation is more Los Angeles and San Bernardino coun- than $27 billion. ties were Anaheim and Santa Ana. Ful- In addition to the Colorado River lerton, which joined the District three Aqueduct, Metropolitan has constructed years later in 1931, is considered one of and maintains reservoirs, filtration the original 13 cities of Metropolitan. plants and hundreds of miles of transmis- Late in 1931 the electorate of Metro- sion lines delivering water to 14 cities, 12 politan approved the $220 million bond municipal water districts and one county issue to construct the Colorado River water authority.These recipients,includ- Aqueduct. It wasn't until June, 1941,that ing the Municipal Water District of filtered and softened water began flow- Orange County, pass the water on to the ing into Southern California homes. ultimate private consumer. 11 t: 3; t, TAX LEVIES SINCE MUNICIPAL PA]L WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY ]FORMATION Fiscal MWDOC Tax Rate Year $/$100 A/V 1951-52 .0364 1952-53 — 1953-54 — 1954-55 — �T 1955-56 — K�T A CUL 1957-58 — The Municipal Water District of 1958-59 .0036 Orange County has two basic sources of 1959-60 .0011 income—water sales and taxation. 1960-61 .0026 However, no profit is derived from 1961-62 .2573 water sales since Municipal charges its 1962-63 .1523 - constituent members exactly what it is 1963 6 4 — 1964-65 — charged by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. 1965-66 .1000 And during its 21 years of existence 1966-67 .0979 Municipal has levied taxes in only eight 1967-68 — of those years. Based on an assessed val- 1968-69 — uation of $100, these taxes amounted to 1969-70 — 1970-71 — only 65.12 cents. 1971-72 — A combination of taxes,sound business practices and frugal expenditures cre- This rate does not include the taxes levied by the Metropolitan Water ated a fund that has been wisely invested District or to pay annexation charges. over the years by the District's treasurer with approval by the Board of Directors. Thus, interest on these investments has provided the bulk of the District's oper- ating funds almost since its inception. The District's records and financial affairs are audited annually by an inde- pendent certified public accounting firm. 12 r DIRECTORS I ST. DIVISION DAVID K.JONES x ` 2NQ DIVISION GERALD E. PRICE SAN `mil_ 3RD.DIVISION CLEM M. MC COLLOCH $ 4TH.DIVISION GLENN P. ALLEN \ 5TH.DIVISION W. B. HELLISlo g 3rd DIVISION \ "'"�° COASTAL r. ■. 0. aoeAui �� 0 E W; NMxNAY t F .. ''YORtiA.IINDA O L A N IRVINE PARK /pNgp °o p (" PUCENTIA aF� N E s !lUBRA VILAA PARK sAxTuoo _ is�:�:::F�.';:�':,p�:;?•"::I. OLIVE `� Cu1vOM,BOAD ,\ ' wit F :::>I:: t DIVI LEMON.XEIGNTB ORANGE a / p a+xrA AxA ExEa •$LISTIN � Y �� BUEIU.PARK s• ++per J+' ' j� �'.y,:.S111TAg..::.P:i'::?^' ' '� DIVISION � .f► ��. � 5th DIVISION ,GARDE GROps :. r �. � � � �4°js �pO.•Na.Ew•+ � g J � �W TMINS� �� IRVINE + I Ya ra � , COASTSL II.M. D. �O+o L A MITOS ' c°+ �t oa m A �'n $ F SAN.JUAN-CAPI37RAN0 �\L N co e..��S1 I SI O' STA ME£QA TAl EWPORT BEACH NA DEL MAR so b APcYF�i r1ATfR flsnmr ARIA POINT m NUN NOTON BEACH "•cmc coASY x SEAL CN I Hu NABBOUR 1 IAGUNA BEACH CA—RANG BEACH ' BALBOA SOUTH LAGUNA SAN CLEMENTE A. 4 SUNSET BEACH L SURFS DE A P A C I F I C O C E A N _MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY BOUNDARY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY DIVISIONS p' 0 COASTAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ORIGINAL CITES 13 a a � _ 3 a 3 a1 .t x NA q x. < ._. X, V s a. t i � ry aY LA Ak w { f z � I�IU Vy E CEPAL WATER AT R INST ECC J_L 07 ORANGE V GIB COUNTY STAFF J. R. LESTER BOYLE WINTHROP O. GORDON CAROL A. BAILEY DENNIS E. MacLAIN STANLEY E. SPRAGUE Consulting Engineer District Counsel Administrative Officer General Manager Assistant Manager Secretary-Treasurer 14 BOARD MEMBERS The leadership of Municipal Water joined the board in 1956 when Mr. For their important work each board District of Orange County is provided by Langenbeck resigned. member receives a fee of $50 for each five dedicated men—four of them serv- As a board member each man is respon- board meeting he attends, not to exceed ing the District since it was formed. sible for representing one of the five two meetings in one month. Present for that first board meeting water divisions within the District. He is Board members are elected to four- in 1951 were Clem M. McColloch, Gerald the"voice"of the people within his divis- year terms by a simple majority vote. E. Price, Glenn P.Allen,W.B. Hellis and ion in all matters relating to imported Public elections are held every two years, Richard H. Rogers. Mr. Rogers resigned water service. He is also responsible for alternating collectively Divisions 1,2 and his post in 1954 and was succeeded by the efficient, effective, long-range 5 and Divisions 3 and 4. Should amember Vernon Langenbeck. David K. Jones operation of the District. resign before his term expires,the Board can suggest a replacement, who must be appointed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors, or call a special election. The Board of Directors meets monthly at 2 P.M.on the fourth Wednesday at the District office in Tustin. Meetings are open to the public. REPRESENTATION OF Municipal also has four representa- ID'I[UN IEIIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY tives on the Board of Directors of the ON METROPOLITAN WATER DISTICT OF Metropolitan Water District of Southern SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COMMITTEES ElES California. Each member agency of Met- ropolitan is entitled to one representative Glenn P. Allen Engineering and Operations on Metropolitan's Board, plus one addi- Organization and Personnel tional member for each full three percent of Metropolitan's total assessed valuation Robert R. Dowling Finance and Insurance within such member agency. Land Representing Municipal are two of W. B. Hellis Land its Board members, Mr. Allen and Mr. Water Problems Hellis, plus Doyle Miller and Mr. Robert Nuclear Power R. Dowling, two non-board members, Seawater Desalination who are permitted to represent Munici- pal at the discretion of Municipal's Doyle Miller Finance and Insurance Board. Legal and Claims In addition to helping Metropolitan determine its policy, the four Municipal representatives serve on six Metropoli- tan standing committees. Mr. Hellis also represents Municipal on a special com- mittee for nuclear power and seawater desalination. 15 s a� a CLEM M. McCOLLOCH (1951) GERALD E. PRICE (1951) Third Division GLENN P. ALLEN (1951) Second Division President,Municipal Water District Fourth Division Vice President,Municipal Water District of Orange County Past President,Municipal Water District of Orange County Retired Citrus Rancher of Orange County Retired Manufacturer Past President,Placentia Fruit Company Director,Metropolitan Water District Past Director,Huntington Tile Company Past President,Placentia Mutual Orange of Southern California Past Chairman,Orange County Airport Association President,Orange Savings&Loan Commission Past President,Associated Farmers of Association California Past Mayor,City of Orange tx W. B. HELLIS (1951) DAVID K. JONES (1956) Fifth Division First Division Past Vice President and General Manager, Retired Insurance and Real Estate The Irvine Company Broker Rancher Past President,Jones,Gillespie& Past Chairman,Santa Ana Community Hospital Goppert,Inc. Board of Directors Past President,Huntington Beach Director,Metropolitan Water District Chamber of Commerce of Southern California "Our obligation is to provide suflicient imported water, ®f the best possible quality,at the lowest cost, t® meet the meads of our constituent agencies. 16 �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK 44 "" Cif 47E� 67 - RESOLUTION NO. 3944 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY REGARDING THE PROPOSED WATER SUPPLY PLAN FOR SOUTHEAST ORANGE COUNTY WHEREAS,.. the City of Huntington Beach has received a report dated July 1.974 , prepared by Boyle Engineering for the. Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) regarding r • water supply for` the southeast portion of Orange County; and Said water supply plan has potential growth impacts which could seriously conflict with growth policies now being con- templated by cities in Orange County, the Intergovernmental Coordinating Council of Orange County and by the Orange County j Board of Supervisors ; and - Said plan contemplates the construction of a new, regional water treatment plant while the MWD Diemer Plant in :Yorba Linda was constructed at considerable expense to provide , water treat- ment capacity for all of Orange .County; and Financing said plan may impose severe inequities "upon cities and .other agencies of northwest Orange- County who" .would derive no benefit from the implementation of said plan, and who have previously paid for water facilities , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City , Council of t, he . City of Huntington Beach expresses its opposition .to the Board of Directors .of .MWDOC regarding the water supply plan for south- east Orange County , as -outlined in the MWDOC report of July 1974 . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City _Council of the City of Huntington Beach At a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of August, 1974 . Mayor - DPB :er k .. � } Rez No. 3044 4 ' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified' City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;. that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the . 19th day, Of August 19 .74 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett-, p tbev_ WiPdAr- Mike, Cop_n NOES: Councilmen: ABSENT: Councilmen: ,hhiiplpyr Gibbs a ' i City Clerk and, ex-officio Clerk of the City Council 'of:;the City of Huntington Beach, California., e "9 ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: <&CMJ�A�t-torn7y APPROVED AS TO CONTEN City Administrator the tosegoijig pstrurncnt Js p.cortbgrvw Of tBae on a aP'�n fi( W his office. ` Attest. . am M. WkNiWofft :. and'.. City Clerk €x-offtc�o C1�rkof the City Council of.the..Caty of.Ffuntingta�igat 2 . f Deputy �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OVERSIZED DOCUMENT ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK 4 r I trr d ow a �- ' � E Saw j A4bar - 4o b xov4 c•+rr y - r is August 20, 1974 Municipal Water District of Orange County 17332 Irvine Boulevard - Suite 6 Tustin, California, 92680 Gentleman: CC]_ Whe City Council of the City Of Huntington Beach, at their regular meeting held Monday, August 19, 1974, adopted Reso- lution No. 3944 expressing opposition to the Municipal Water District of Orange County regarding the proposed water supply plan for southeast Orange County. Enclosed is a copy of said resolution for your information.. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AM:cb enc. August 20, 1974 YntergovernmsntU Coordinating Council of Orange County Suite 439 Bank of America Tower One City Boulevard West, The City Orange, CA 92668 Attention; John L. Fellows, Jr. Executive Director Gentlemen t They City Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, August 19, 1974 adopted Resolution No. 3944 ex- pressing opposition to the Municipal Water District of Orange County regarding the proposed water supply plan for southeast Orange County. We would appreciate the distribution of said resolution through, the Resolution Service established by your organization. A cer- tified copy of Resolution No. 3922 is enclosed. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW-.cb enc. J� CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH CA 74-73 ' s COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To Honorable Mayor and From City Administrator . City Council Members Subject MUNICIPAL WATER DI:STPUCT OT Pate- Avzus,t 16 , 1974: ORANGE COUNTY After examination .of the p-r©posa . rb.y the .1"�.D.O.C, , by �Ix. Hartge and the City Administrator, a;s outling,d in• the report dated July 1914 to construct a water treatment plant,• main transmission• mains and the raising of the Santiago Reservoir, it is -our recommendation that the City Council t..entatively -express opposition to the project. An argument of ,.W =I ..O. C. is that this .regional .pl:an will be an oppor- tunity for balancing the equities_ in the entire district: which comprises approximately $b o the County. This may be- the result but it would be at the expense o.f the. residents of the communities in the northwest end - of the County who have already paid extensively for our .supply It has been stated by the M.W.D.O. C. that it would purchase from the City of Huntington Beach the City '.s share of the West Orange County Water Board lines, the City ' s share of the Huntington Beach-Costa Mesa County Water District transmission main and pay for the City' s rights to 400 acre feet of capacity in the San Joaquin Reservoir. This could result in cash payment in the order of $2 ,000 ,000 . 00 . This is cute an imposing figure , however, we' must remember that th-ese investments have •resulted primarily from, Revenue bonds' for the expansion of our water system. The bulk of the funds resulting from the purchase of these fac- ilities would not .be available to the General Fund. It is reported that the future cost to the residents for the proposed facilities by M.W.D. O. C. would vary between 7� and 25¢ per $100 . 00 .. B•ased .on an assessed evaluation of $530 ,000,000 in Huntington Beach,, a `surcharge of 10� per $100 . 0.0 would co=st the residents $53.0.;000 per year,. The potential impact of th.e water facilities resulting from .the proposed project to the a:,rea must be considered I3e.st of the c i.t ,e.s in the County, the Inter-Governmental Coordinating Council and the Board of Supervisors have been reviewing for a number of months growth policies . M.W.D.O-:C. feels that their project represents 'good planning for the future needs of' th.e area rather than being a growth inducing plan. `. Until. the growth policies as. described: above are known, this argument is difficult to analyze. This matter will be discussed more fully with the Council members on Monday. Respectfully submitted, Al David D. Rowlands City. Administrator. DDR:cb w - FRANK EDETTI N IIA E MD YONS JACK _t..-.� . _• i •V- rl.. " RICHAR SON MASTEN JOHN R.DORTON JOSEPH L.DONDERO �"'"�'"""'� JOE J.WAIDHOFER ROBERT C.SAGEHORN STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGER THOMAS J.SHEPHARD I GENERAL COUNSEL i 2526 EAST FREMONT STREET P. O. BOX ,5t57 �STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95205 209/466-3114 RESOLUTION 74-75-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE STOCKTON-EAST WATER DISTRICT RELATIVE TO OPPOSING THE STANISLAUS RIVER INITIATIVE - PROPOSITION 17 i WHEREAS, a small group of white water enthusiasts calling themselves "Friends of the River" have spearheaded an .n1.t.;i.ative circulating campaign which has resulted in the inclusion of Proposition 17 on the ballot at the November general election; and WHEREAS, Proposition 17, if adopted, would place two portions of the Stanislaus River within the California Wild� and Scenic River Act and would seriously cloud the future of the ongoing and urgently needed New Melones Dam Project; and WHEREAS, . the so-called "Friends of the River" who are currently waging a massive public relations campaign in i support of Proposition 17 are substantially composed of and financed by several commercial rafting companies that for a l fee of $50 to $60 transport persons down a. nine-mile stretch of the Stanislaus River from Camp Nine to the Parrots Ferry i Bridge - one of the two sections of the river which they seek C to have included within the Wild and Scenic River Act; and i 0 ,3 g e n n n WHEREAS, the_. year round white water which has been commercially exploited by some of the Friends of the River and environmentally touted by all of them, results not from natural flows along the river, but from water which is stored behind a Pacific Gas and Electric Company diversion structure and released through a large metal pipe into the main stream of the Stanislaus River just above Camp Nine; and WHEREAS, the second section of the Stanisalus River and its environs which. would• be included within the Wild and Scenic River system should Proposition 17 be adopted, 0 actually includes portions of the Cities of Oakdale and Riverbank; and WHEREAS, none of those portions of the upper Stan islaus River which arise in and flow through the beautiful Sierra Nevada Mountains and more logically belong within the Wild and Scenic River system would be included in that system should Proposition 17 pass; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the fact that they lost a protracted court battle which significantly delayed the New Melones project at a cost of over twenty million dollars to .the taxpayers and which ultimately reached the United States Supreme Court, the Friends of the River have continued their blind opposition to the New Melones project by attempting to mislead the voters of the State of California into believing that the New Melones Dam will have an adverse effect on the environment and that the only way to "save the river" is to pass Proposition 17; and -2- WHEREAS, construction of- the New Melones Dam is t: presently underway with the diversion tunnel and related structures already in place, and expenditures approaching eighty million dollars having already been made; and WHEREAS, the dam would provide urgently needed flood protection to areas of the lower Stanislaus River basin, the San Joaquin River basin, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta which areas have suffered many millions 'of dollars in damages due to floods over the years; and WHEREAS, in . stark contrast to the 80,000 visitor days which the Stanislaus River is capable of supporting - annually for recreation should that much demand build up, the New Melones Reservoir and related recreational facilities to be created along a 55-mile stretch of the lower river would provide recreational opportunities totaling four(4) million visitor days annually by creating public access for fishing, boating, camping, picnicking, canoeing, kayaking and rafting in areas which are now privately owned and inacces- sible to the public; "and WHEREAS, releases of stored water from behind the dam will be used to improve the severely deteriorated water equality in the lower Stanislaus River and its distributary system, including the Sacramento--;San Joaquin Delta, and' will significantly assist in" restoring King Salmon runs which have ,. recently dwindled from historic runs of close to 150,000 fish to just slightly more than 1,000 fish annually; and '� -3- N . WHEREAS, New Melones Dam will ,have .the capability of saving over 700,0OO barrels, of crude oil annually by generating enough clean, pollution-free hydroelectric energy to supply all of the needs of a city twice the size of Berkeley, California; and WHEREAS, the water conservation yield of New Melones Dam could be put to full use in, and is badly .needed by, numerous water agencies throughout the Counties of Calaveras, Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin; and WHEREAS, this Board firmly believes that a well informed electorate will soundly defeat Proposition 17 provided that sufficient effort is made to present the true facts regarding the Stanislaus River to the voters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Stockton-East Water District that its members hereby formally declare their opposition to Proposition 17; and be it further RESOLVED, that this Board urges it's citizens and all other citizens -of the State of California to vote "NO" on Proposition 17; and be it further . RESOLVED, that this Board hereby calls upon all other responsible and concerned public agencies within the State of California to formally declare their opposition to Proposition 17; and be it further 1; �\ -4- iRESOLVED, that copies of this Resolution be transmitted to the Association of California Water Agencies, the California Water Resources Association, Californians Against Proposition 17, the Board of Supervisors of every county, and the governing body of every city within the State of California. I hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 74-75-7 of the Board of Directors of the STOCKTON-EAST WATER DISTRICT adopted at a meeting of the Board held on the 3rd day of September, 1974. r- $gltember 11, 1974 Date Robert C. Sagehlorn General-Manager STOCKTON-EAST WATER DISTRICT .21 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION eHONTINGTON BEACH To Planning Commission From Recreation and Parks Commission Subject Los Patos-Warner property triangle Date May 10 , 1973 At their regular meeting on May 9 , the Recreation and Parks Commission discussed at the request of the City Council the proposed uses of the 2.6 acre triangular-shaped property parcel at Warner, Los Patos , and Marina Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Upon motion by Mr. James Shepard with second by Mrs . Betty Kennedy the Recreation and Parks Commission recommended to the Planning Commission that the 2 .6 acre property triangle 'at Los Patos and Warner be rezoned for recreational use and that the master plan of Parks , Open Space, Schools , and Recreation be so amended. Motion carried 6-4 . Respectfully submitted, Secretary Recreation and P ks Commission cc to : City Administrator City Council Recreation and Parks Commission _, CHTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,� ` HUNTINGTON BEACH I I To Planning Commission From Recreation and Parks Commission Subject Los Patos-Warner property Date May 15, 1973 triangle The Recreation and Parks Commission met in special session on May 14, at Murdy Park Community Center to review City Staff recommendations on the Los Patos-Warner 2 . 6 acre property triangle. I RECOMMENDATION: Following discussion and review of attached staff report , the Recreation and Parks Commission unanimously recommended to the Planning Commission that they continue I the proposed R-lPD for the 2 .6 acre Los Patos-Warner property for another month to allow staff to determine a firm appraisal of the value of the site, the value of the county property offered in exchange , and the development cost as a park site so that differences in values can then be evaluated by the Commission in relation to the over-all needs of the city. Respectfully submitted, Secretary Recreation and Parks C mmission cc to : City Administrator City Council Recreation and Parks Commission r County of Orange PM 1135 Warner & Algonquin Streets DATE: April 16, 1§73 To: Supervisor David L. Baker DEPT/DIST: District No. 2 FROM: George H. Cormack. Ass't Dir. DEFT/DIST: Beal Property Serviges SUBJECT: I discussed with Tom Galvan, our Agent handling the Darner and Algonquin Street parcels, the various ways that the City of Huntington Beach's proposed development of a park on Warner Avenue could be brought about. He in turn discussed the various alternatives with Art Wahlstedt in County Counsel's Office. The j results of these discussions are summarized in the attached memo. i It would appear that the only practical way of achieving this is as discussed in Item 3 of Tom's memo to me. This method would 1 be consistent with the past transfers of property to cities for the development of parks . In these past instances the County j has received 50% of market value. We estimate the market value j of this property to be from $70,000 to $80 ,000. I Let me know if I can be of any further help to you on this. I i eo H. Cormack As istant Director i I GHC:hw Attachment F690-123 t ML a , ro U April 13, 1973 PM 1135 Warner and. Algonquin Streets TO.. George H® Cormaek Assistant o FROM: Thomas Galwo Foal ? T"hVAGIAM I mat with WshlAtadt., DwrAty C6unty Co=ks*1, and we discussed the subject p Is relative to the questtoas poemd by Supervisor Baker. The meeting resulted as the following d A I. Under eti 25550. ( e gat Code) , ,the County surplus real pr6operty to s city for park purposes without consideration other than t b a city to Main A public park an e' property. This does not help the, situation because the city .Mould have to maintain a park are• the. land we gave theta. They could. not Use it in an exchan m 2. The County cannot exchange its iurplus hand for the privately owned parcel unless that ,parc*l is required for County use. 3. Under Section 25365 (Government Code) , the County could cc thte •surplus par eelffi , upon any terms and conditions agreed upon, to the city. feels that there must be some consideration outright gift is questionable. Art said that it would Ortbably be alright if the County Conveyed the surplus liind. to the City (ev6n for no monetary consideration) if the agreement was that the City iould exchange the surplus 1$nd for other land that the city would k and maintain for pub li c us e Thomas GAlyan Real Property Technician f. TG/s c - WARNER -- - — + - -- T.P�Ik(SF£e OF �"E TirCE 72J C�7'Y - ; _ '�� f: On! ev.vaYr,oH 74Kr it& GEED y :t�,-o:;:�.� Pv�N /E/r9�EA� CA.a�tc9r°i.✓G. l�) � C� '� �`-- �..J so%l -ID C f g .,�x Y •irk s.,�t 4.r�� `• , V r�1 W J . ul r TRACT f � NO. 349 # `F' K i M.M. P) . 1 � I IS-17 rr..%-.».r..riw ..rr.r.>; .ie rrr,rr it-q:iae.aw.re•.a.i na 11V.W 9 B nrs.�.�%�iw�.Ia.d,/!aw SrwA M fe BR Iia•wa .. >.. ir.r M ra N•y'ws.e (nr iw.r..".rr..':l..r«r a..i v:�:�.o.^a.�.r.iw.s+.:�.a..r ✓irr w "�+��. ' - irrcr,.wa.wr ea �y a rn..r.i w...H orr,eu ai,•• o•t isiB-ja n.+wr. a.'r'/Nr1.' w ror sMa,+� r wa CiaM.wrw y.'9 Mvis��w r/W -- --� J C r I + a ORION ----- ----- — STREET a m�ra r'� t✓' TRACT NO. 475 y0�� IY M M Q __ M n 7V w,.I«n.,r.,...•r. ....r r, go COUNTY Of Tn .w r wrn. . 'o+r[r eT ur a[vwroKe w ,•w L 17-19 0 J00K „l ,a» DEPARTMENT OF REAL PROPERT ORANGE • to 'fib .M• •o..I,t1» apCa(p TY tla GmtKT xio M4ft- 64. •»..-.».»�^,Ll"ft�-..... .•, •� WARNER AVHNUE AND rf �f g , J04 �.ww�ry pe ALGONQUIN STREET 1, e .A4 - b•1 w THE CITT.OF NUNTMOTM BACK :.� REMARKS )-s-,9 cr rtl U 1Of t p x w v _ (f{UJIj ,�. p m ecaoie so /9 I/6 /a / 6v 18 /T 3.wag col: i /, 1 Cy i . , s-v.;; d;^art✓ PL/d[•E 4.0 Vv t & cq u teL12 06 J ( • i J� A f S 6 dl� VE o4L r Wit It ri DRIVE /00 �� �t10`I,/� 07=`A/� �/.? .y SYjil F //� 1-�9 Cy 7�• �- _ i � . ,ter,J'aA- /Vo 56 fV07E ASSESSORS r:C !K 8 ASSES`k)R'S % AP ED6EWATEP PAP,CEL. NUMBERS � 5'�:.;� 17F PAGE 28 ME �.�- ------ -t% 0 0 D 'r G Z� ° i 0. M E M, AN 1 April 13, 1973 PM 1135 Warner and Algonquin Streets TO: George H. Cozusak Assistant Director FAOM: Thoamis Gal '1leal crop I met with Art W*h lsta , D uty Cry CowlsandNip b R' discussed the sub feet parcels relative to the guaestim s posted by Supervisor Baker. The meeting resulted in the following c=Ments and Opialagw. I. Under Section 25550 (Government Corte) , ,the County may convey surplus real property to a city for park purposes without consideration other than agreement by the city to maintain a public park on the property. This does not help the situation because the city would have to maintain a park on the land we gave them. They could not use it in an exchange. 2. The County cannot exchange its surplus land for the privately owned parcel unless that parcel is required for County use. 3. Under Section 25 365 (Government Code) , the County could convey the surplus parcels , upon any terms and conditions agreed upon, to the city. Art Peels that there must be some consideration as an outright gift is questionable. Art said that it would probably be alright if the County conveyed the surplus land to the City (even for no monetary consideration) if the agreement was that the City would oxahange the surplus land for other land that the city would keep and maintain for public use. Thomas Galvan Real Property Technician TG/s c ®• City of Huntington Beach • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 19, 1977 Honorable. Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Subject: Water Rate Increase Dear Council Members: The data contained herein is basically the same as that sent to you a week ago in the form of a memorandum, however, this package augments that information. Atwater rate study was completed in 1975 resulting in an increase effective July of that year. During July of 1976 a commodity adjustment of 6% was made to provide funds for the increased cost imposed by the Metropolitan Water District and the Orange County Water District. The 1975 study further projected that revenues in 1977-78 would fall short of meeting the needs for that year. Accordingly, with the aid of a con- sultant our staff made a rate study to arrive at an equitable method of deriving funds to meet those needs. The major items dictating the need for additional revenue are: 1. Increase in cost for water purchase and distribution $241,000 (MWD and Power) 2 . Cost for accommodation of Water Department operations $300, 000 (Remodel and expand existing buildings) 3. Increased overhead cost (in-lieu tax and depreciation) $289,000 i 4 . Anticipated loss in revenue when 8% reduction in consumption occurs $300.,000 Item 1 is absolutely essential . Items 2 , 3 and 4 are required but can be modified. One item not shown, but considered, is personnel cost to enforce rationing if that becomes necessary. / l Honorable Mayor and City Council May 19, 1977 Page 2 We also gave .further consideration to the basic water rate. Since each service consists of a meter which must be maintained and read, accounting records kept, and billings prepared, a minimum charge should be made to cover these costs. The current minimum charge includes the first 1, 400 cubic feet of water used during a two month billing period. It is possible that one person living alone or a small family conserva- tive in their water usage could use less than 1,400 cubic feet in a two i month period. We have considered reducing the minimum charge along with reducing the quantity of water included in this charge. The high volume user is presently charged less for water used in excess of 5, 000 cubic feet than the residential user on minimum charge. Indications are that water cost is not a significant factor to industry in selecting Huntington Beach as a possible location. Industrial inquiries are normally in regard to water pressure and available quantity. Consideration was first given for the need of approximately $850, 000 additional revenue assuming any one of Items 2 , 3 and 4 were excluded from the budget. Further consideration was given to the need of approximately $530, 000 assuming any two items were excluded from the budget. Four basic rates are presented for consideration; see Exhibit "A" attached. Rates A and B are anticipated to produce additional revenues of $856 , 000 and $860, 000 respectively. Rates C and D are anticipated to produce additional revenues of $513, 000 and $528 , 000 respectively. Exhibit "B" indicates the, increase in water bills for each proposed rate. Exhibit "C" compares Huntington Beach bills with bills for equal consumption in other cities. Since most of the other cities contacted indicated they were planning rate increases , Exhibits "C" and "D" should be considered in that light. Exhibit "D" shows a comparison of typical bills of residential water use with neighboring cities and Exhibit "E" shows a comparison of typical bills of industrial water use with neighboring cities. In comparing Rates A and B (Exhibit "A") , the "A" rate provides for a minimum charge of $6 . 16 for the first 1,400 cubic feet (2 months bill) , whereas the "B" provides for a minimum charge of $4 . 90 for the first 1, 000 cubic feet (2 months bill) . We recommend Rate "B" since it is in keeping with our water conservation objectives and those that are now using the minimum quantity can effect some economy by reducing their consumption. Under Rate "B" the minimum bill would be reduced from $2 . 80 to $2 . 45 per month. Very truly yours, H. E. Hart Director of Public Works / HEH:ae Attach. �J w ALTERNATE RATES FOR CONSIDERATION Current Water Rate (Per Month) First 1400 cu. ft./2mos. min. charge $5. 60 Next 4300 cu. ft. $0. 30 per 100 cu. ft. Over 5000 cu. ft. $0. 25, per 100 cu. ft. To produce approximately 850, 000. 00 additional revenue: Rate (A) First 1400 cu. ft/2 mos. Min Charge $6 .16 Over 1400 cu. ft. $0. 30 per 100 cu. ft. Projected Additional Revenue = $856 , 000 Rate (B) First 1000 cu. ft./2 mos. Min Charge $4.90 Over 1000 cu. ft. $0. 38 per 100 cu. ft. Projected Additional Revenue = $860 ,000 To produce approximately $530 ,000. 00 additional revenue: Rate (C) First 1400 cu. ft./2 mos. Min Charge $5. 60 Over 1400 cu. ft. $0. 36 per 100 cu. ft. Projected Additional Revenue = $513, 000 Rate (D) First 1000 cu. ft./2 mos . Min Charge $ ..50 Over 1000 cu. ft. $0. 35 per 100 cu. ft.. Projected Additional Revenue $528 ,000 Exhibit A EFFECT Proj. Additional Rev. $856,000 $860,000 $513,000 $528,000 Consumption Current (A) - (B) (C) (D) bi-monthly $ Bill $ Bill $ Inc. % $ Bill $ Inc a $Bill $ Inc % $ Bill $ Inc 8 Minimum 1,000 5.60 6.16 0.56- 10 4.90 -0.70 -13 5.60 0 0 4.50 -1.10 -20 Users 1,400 5.60 . 6.16 0.56 10 6.42 0.82 15 5.60 0 0 5.90 0.30 5 Typical Single Fam. 3,000 10.40 12.40 2.00 19 12.50 2.10 20 11.36 0.96 9 11.50 1.10 11',. 10,000' 28.90 39.70 10.80 37- 39.10 10.20 35 36.56 7.66 26 36.00 7.10 25 Small Alult. Res. or 20,000 53.90 78.70 24.80 46 77.10 23.20 43 72.56 18.66 35 71.00 17.10 32 Comm. 50,000 128.90 195.70 66.80 52 191.10 62.20 48 180.56 51,66 40 176.00 41.10 37 Large Apt. 200,000 503.90 780.70 276.80 55 761.10 257.26 51 720.56 216.66 43 701.00 197.10 39 Como lex 500,000 1253.90 1950.70 696.80 56 1901.10 647.20 52 1800.56 546.66 44 1751.00 497.10 40^ 4 Largest 1,500,000 3733.90 5850.70 2096.80 56 5701.10 1947.20 52 5400.56 1646.66 44 5251.00 1497.10 40 Users: Edison, City of H.B., 5,000,000 12,503.90 19,500.70 6996.80 56 19,001.10 6497.20 52 1800.56 5496.66 44 17501.00 4997.10 40 Seacliff, McDonnel Douglas Exhibit B Page 4 COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL WATER RATES (Based on 3000 cu. ft. Bi-monthly cons. ) Current Billing Under New Rate Schedules Bi-Monthly Bill A B C D Huntington Beach $10. 40 12. 40 12. 50 11. 36 11. 50 Newport Beach (1) 14 . 80 Irvine (2) 13. 70 Garden Grove 11. 75 j Santa Ana (3) 10. 90 Costa Mesa CWD 12 . 90 (1) Effective 7-1-77 $16. 60 (2) Effective 6-1-77 $15. 00 (3) Water rate study pending COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL WATER RATES (Based on 500 , 000 cu. ft. Bi-monthly cons. ) Current Billing under New Rate Schedules Bi-monthly Bill A B C D Huntington Beach $1253. 90 $1950. 70 $1901. 00 $1800. 56 $1751. 00 Newport Beach (4) 1363 . 00 Irvine (5) 1463 . 00 Garden Grove 1554. 38 Santa Ana (6) 1214 . 40 Costa Mesa CWD 2150. 00 (4) Effective 7-1-77 $1564 . (5) Effective 6-1-77 $1989 (6) Water rate study pending Exhibit C 16.60 W - N r Q r W � S O n Z TYPICAL WATER BILL (BI-MONTHLY) $ AMOUNTS 15.00 14.80 W N r - Q r W Q r U ip Z 13.70 �- 12.90 12.50 12.40 11.75 11.50 11.36 c o 3 3 = uw V O l 10.90 >O Q V W Q w Z m a _ z _ _ m ¢ Lu 0 10.40 FQ- U o < m Z a m a m m a m m o ¢ ul i S to S S C7 S = U — CURRENT RATES COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL WATER RATES '1 � Exhihit "D" . U J BASED ON 3000 CU. FT. BIMONTHLY CONSUMPTION ) 5/17/77 y; 2150.00 TYPICAL WATER BILL (BI-MONTHLY) $ AMOUNTS 1989.00 1950.70 1901.00 r n 1800.56 m i 1751.00 w 0 a w Q Q z 1554.38 1564.00 n r ti. i K 1463.00 U z 1364.00 1253.90 0 3 1214.40 x 3 v w U > Q x a O w U to a m -Z w z _ _ a Z cc .. Q CC w O U m a w Q H a a _. z_ F a m a w Ll tom m � O 0 zcn x x x ¢, U CURRENT RATES COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL WATER RATES Exhibit "E" (BASED ON 500,000 CU FT BI-MONTHLY CONSUMPTION) 5/19/77 lie 1"j STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY EDM6�D G. BROWN JR., Governor DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES P.O. BOX 388 SACRAMENTO 95802 (916) 445-9248 MAY 2 5 1977 Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P . 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Wentworth: Thank you for your April 21 letter and the resolution on water conservation adopted by the Huntington Beach Council. Your support in urging water conservation is greatly appreciated. As you are aware, the impact of the drought can be minimized through prudent management of our water resources, including conservation. Thank you for sending us a copy of your Resolution No. 4452 establishing policies and procedures in support of water conservation. Sincerely, 4h� /J Ronald B. Robie Director FA--ZTS ABOUT WATER. y� r kk YOU / WHY Huntington Beach needs more water? WHAT the Special Water Bond Election on April 30 means to you? WHY no increase in taxes or higher water rates will be required? WHY every voter should vote YES in this election? A Summary_of the April 30 Water Bond Election prepared by- The Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce �ij j FORWARD =* On April 30, the citizens of Huntington Beach will vote on a water bond issue of $5, 700, 000 to provide additional water supplies and facilities for our city, Your Chamber of Commerce believes that this election represents one of the most important decisions affecting our city that the voters of this community will ever make, We hope that this booklet will help provide you with the necessary background and information to make that decision an informed one , The Chamber, along with other civic organizations; is strongly in favor of this bond issue for the fol- lowing reasons . 1;, Our present water system is almost at full capacity , Additional sources and improve- ments are needed to serve our expanding population, 2. If we are to use Metropolitan Water District water o our best source m we must make com- mitments now to ensure an adequate share... 3 ., These facilities will be financed through 30myear revenue bonds which are repaid only through revenues derived from water sales : No increase in pro ep rty taxes or tax rates are permitted for revenue bonds .. No increase in water rates will be required, j i 4 , If the city is able to purchase the private water company, lower rates, better service, and coordinated planning will result for ( their present customers I We sincerely urge every voter to learn the facts , to discuss them with his friends and neighbors, and to vote YES on April 30 for the continued growth of Huntington Beach. I . WHAT®S THE PROBLEM? Water is the problem or rather, the lack of it. Like so many communities in Southern California, and in other parts of the country, Huntington Beach is facing squarely the question © where will next year' s water come from? Our fantastic growth rate, coupled with dimi.n- ish.in,g water supplies, makes it necessary to solve this problem now,, before the pinch is felt. IT'S A FACT that the present population, plus the people that will move into developments currently planned for our city, will stretch our water system to its full capa- city. lt � s wishful thinking to assume that our growth will end with the homes now on the drawing boards. New citizens are the lifeblood of a healthy community o they represent additional gobs,, new purchasing power, and a more secure economic base for our city. With these facts in mind,, our city officials have conducted exhaustive studies of the future water re- quirements of the community and the best ways to meet these requirements. They have now presented the results of these studies as a definitive plan and have asked the voters for their approval on April 30. Where does our water come from now? Where should we get more? How should we pay for it? The following pages outline the answers to these, and similar questions as presented by the proposed water bond. program. -I- Iio TABLE I Comparison Of Average Residential Water Rates Dollars Per Month Santa Ana - - 3.30 Carden Grove - - - 3.35 Anaheim 3.40 Huntington Beach 3.67 (City Water) -- Costa Mesa 3.80 I Buena Panic - 4.43 Southern. Califs „ ' 4.72 Water Company -2- 11 . WHAT ABOUT OUR PRESENT WATER? Huntington Beach is now served by two separate water systems, the -municipal water department, and Southern California Water Company, a private utility, Prior to 1960, the entire community was served by Southern California Water Company from wells drilled at the north edge of the city, At the end of 1961, this company had approximately 2,800 service connections representing about 11,000 people. In 1955, the city began to make plans for a municipal water system based on imported water, and obt ained initial financing through a general obliga- tion bond approved by the voters. The municipal water system was opened in early 1960 with 200 customers, and has continued to grow with the sub- sequent expansion of the city. By the end of 1962, our municipal system had 6,600 service connection's serving approximately 25,000 people with water fram the Colorado River, 'via the Metropolitan Water District. What are the results of the operation of our municipal water department to date? Have they been doing a good job? Lets look at the record. With water rates to its customers comparable to surrounding communities (see table opposite page) , the water department, in its three years of operation, . has accummutlated a reserve surplus of $80,000. In addition, they have spent, out of current revenues, approximately $50,000 in additional capital improve- ments to expand and improve service, We think that this is a good indication that our municipal water system is well run for the benefit of the community. -3- (71 •. TABLE 2 Growth Of Population, Hunt n&Low Beach_ 1950 59200 1955 59900 1960 119 500 1963 409000 1965 ? 909000 1970 175 ,000 -4- III ., HOW MUCH WATER DO WE 'NEED? WHERE WILL IT COME FROM? Our future water requirements are directly re- lated to the number of people served, From past experience, and from calculations, engineers can predict the average amount of water used per person served o in Orange County it is estimated that about 170 gallons will be needed for each person, The problem is to determine the future population of the area to be served. Opposite is a table showing Huntington Beach 's past population and one estimate of future growth. From the many studies on the subject of the future population of Huntington Beach, made by such agencies as Stanford Research Institute, consulting engineers, the Chamber of Commerce, and the water department, it was decided that it would be unreal- istic to design for a population of any less than 175,000 people. This, then, was the target set for the studies of the water department o enough water for 175,000 people, an average of over 25 million gallons a day, plus allowance for peak demands, adequate distribum Lion, and sufficient storage for emergencies. Where should this water come from - from wells in the city, or from imported sources? The question. of wells was thoroughly studied since it appeared slightly cheaper in the short run. However, this source was ultimately rejected because of anticipated rising costs, possibilities of salt water intrusion, and unfavorable geologic conditions. Since Huntington Beach, along with most of the other communities in Orange County, is a member of the Metropolitan Water District, and is already entitled to receive MWD water imported from the Colorado River, the expansion of these existing facilities was adopted as the most economical and reliable program over the years . -5- III Continued) As you know, the Metropolitan Water District is an organization made up of cities, counties , and special water areas all over the coastal basin which have banded together in a cooperative effort to furnish. its -members sufficient water for their needs at a cost lower than any one -municipality could obtain by bringing in water on its own. Since the MWD, by necessity, must make plans and begin construction years ahead of actual -need, it requires that its member communities also firmly commit themselves in advance to obtain maximum benefits of cooperative construction. In return, the members are guaranteed a supply of water equal to their share of costs, Since 100% of the potential supply is allotted prior to construction, EuntingLon Beach must reserve an adequate suD at this time or wait years to obtain a share in future expansion of MWD facilities , � C J IV, WHAT FACILITIES DO WE NEED? HOW MUCH WILL THEY COST? The estimated cost of the facilities required to ensure our future water supply is $4, 200,000. About 60% of this money will be spent, in cooperation with other cities, in. bringing water to Orange County, The remainder will be spent for facilities to bring the main lines to Huntington Beach (again in coopera- tion with adjacent communities) , for distribution lines within the city, and for temporary storage within the city, It is estimated that approximately one-half of this money will be expended during 1963/1964 and about one-quarter during each of the following two years In addition, our city is requesting that an additional $1, 500,000 in bonds be authorized to per- mit them to negotiate with the Southern California Water Company for the purchase of its water system and local assets , This company has approached the city with an offer to sell; and it appears logical and reasonable, in a dynamic city such as ours, to have all the water systems under one coordinated agency, so that uniform service and planning can be offered to all the residents of the community, Decreased water rates would be offered to users immediately if the purchase is completed® In addition, fire insurance rates in the downtown area, currently very high because of inadequacies in water supplies for firefighting, should be reduced as the system is expanded to fit current needs It should be emphasized that this money will only be used when, and if, the city is able to nego- tiate a purchase of the private company that appears favorable and economic to the city as a whole , Then, the bonds actually sold will be only an amount sufficient to consummate the purchase, While the -7- IV, (continued) actual purchase price will be arrived at by lengthy economic studies to consider the age, condition, and future utility of the private system, preliminary studies have indicated that the -maximum fair price would not exceed the authorization requested. -8- Va 'HOW DO WE PAY FOR THESE FACILITIES? (AND CAN WE AFFORD IT?) After the city had completed its study of future water requirements, and had determined the estimated costs, as outlined previously, it called upon. Stone and Youngberg, well-known municipal financing con- sultants, to investigate the .financial feasibility, of their plans and to recommend an appropriate form of paying for them. After almost six months of exhaustive study, these consultants concluded that "The findings and analyses presented in this report lead to the general conclusion that the estimated revenues :from the city water system based on current dater rates will be sufficient to meet operating expenses and to amortize the first issue of the revenue bonds needed to finance the constr^uc- Lion of the improvements previously described. " In other words, this report states that Huntington Beach should be able to pay for these facilities out of the revenues to be wined frog the improvements themselves, without increasing taxes or water rates . The recommendation that the city finance these imm provements by -means of revenue bonds was accepted, and it is these bonds on which you will be asked to vote on April 30. There are many advantages to using revenue bonds instead of general obligation bonds .for financing improvements of this nature if the improvements are self-supporting in nature - as Stone and Young°berg have concluded that these are. General obligation bonds, and their interest, are secured by ad valorem taxes on all taxable property in the city, Revenue bonds, as authorized by the Revenue Bond Law of 1941, have the following important differences from general obligation bonds ° -9- V.. (continued) L Revenue bonds are repaid solely out of the revenue of the project they finance, They are not secured by liens on property and ca.nnotA therefore. be repaid through the use of taxes , 2 � Revenue bonds separate the financing of the water system from the financing of the reMainder of the city' s opera-Lions, thus permitting a closer check on the use and results of their sale. 3. Since the bonds are not a liability of the city9s 'taxes, they do not impair the city' s ability to borrow for other purposes if necessary, It should be added, that, for the purpose of predicting E uture revenues and expenses of the water department, the cityes consultants insisted upon taking the most conservative views possible. For example s the total amount to supply 1758000 people , was assumed to be spent, and the growth of the city was assumed to be halted at about 60,000 population to determine the effect upon the financial obliga- tions . Even under these severe conditions, the water revenues were sufficient to pay current expenses and amortize the bonds without increases in rates . _10- VI . QUESTIONS AND ANSt4ERS ABOUT THE PROPOSED WATER BOND ISSUE 1 Q, SPECIFICALLY 9 WHAT ARE THE FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED WITH THE BOND REVENUES? A. Current estimates for facilities required and their costs are as follows Ca acity Rights Irvine Ranch Reservoir $ 502g000 'West Orange Coast Feeder #2 191255000 Irvine Reservoir 9409000 Transmission. Line Reservoir and Appurtenances Reservoirs $ 6002,000 Land Acquisition 75 000 Connecting Mains 75�,000 Distribution System Interconnect Irvine Reservoir Transmission Line $ 280 000 i Reservoir Hill Extension and Coast Loop 2209000 Other Mains and Disco Equipment 183t000 Total Project Costs $450009000 Bond Reserve 200m000 Total Bonds Required $49200�000 z' �I � ®ll- i� VI . (continued) Q. HOW CERTAIN ARE THESE COSTS? A. These costs are engineering estimates only, and are naturally subject to some change as detained designs are completed. It is anticipated that the total sum will not exceed the total authorized. In the event that the actual, costs are less than antici- pated,, only the bonds actually required will be sold, with a resultant saving to the city. Q, ARE THERE ANY OTHER CHANCES THAT ALL OF THE BONDS MAY NOT BE REQUIRED? A. Yes , if th.e revenues from the water department sufficiently exceed the estimated costs, some of these improvements may be paid for out of current operating revenues, thereby eliminating the interest charges on the bonds, In addition, it may not be possible to arrive at a purchase price for 'the Southern California dater Company that is satis- factory to the current owners and to the city. In any of these cases, when it is definitely deter- mined that bond sales will not be required, the City Council will cancel the authorized bonds in the amount not required. Q. WHY ASK FOR ALL THE TOTAL AUTHORIZATION NOW, IF THERE 1S A CHANCE THAT ALL OF THE MONEY MAY NOT BE NEEDED? A. Because it is necessary to make commitments for most of this money at the present time, and in order to make such commitments, the city must know with certainty that the money is available. Estimates of future sources of revenue are not enough. to base a long-range plan such as this® ,12m VI . (continued) Q. CAN I BE CERTAIN THAT MY TAXES WON§T BE INCREASED TO COVER THESE BONDS? A. Yes,, The bond-holders have no lien on- the city' s taxes or general revenues as a result of these bonds, They -must be repaid from water revenues , Q, CAN I BE CERTAIN THAT THE WATER RATES WONwT BE RAISED? A. No,, It certainly appears that a raise in water rates will not be required, the city' s consultants have concluded that existing rates are more than adequate to cover expenses and bond retirement and still maintain a surplus , However, there can be no guarantee that future operating costs will not rise to a point where the current rates would be insufficient to meet all obligations , Final de- termination of water rates rests with the City Council. Q, HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO REPAY THESE BONDS, AND WHAT RATE OF INTEREST WILL THEY CARRY? A. The bonds will be repaid over a 30-year period, This will allow those who benefit from the improve- ments to repay the costs through their use of the water. There is no way, to predict the exact interest rate since the bonds are sold by bid to the group offering the lowest rate . The economic studies of this project used a 4" % interest rate , It is felt :"2' that this is a conservative estimate and that the actual rate will be lower,, Q. WILL THE PURCHASE OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY RESULT IN LOWER RATES FOR ITS PRESENT CUSTOMERS? A. Yes, If the city purchases this water company, it is their intent to equalize rates for the users throughout the city. -13- CA4 Pe PRIVATE WATER ASSOCIATIONS AND/OR WELLS L (Not all wells are listed, for complete list contact Bob Allen, Water Department) Boulevard Gardens Water Company 8232 Friesland Drive Huntington Beach CA , 92647 (R D 252) Attn: Bob Vogel, Vice President (714) 842-2834 Green Street Area Water Users (R D 165) (No further information - contact Bob Allen) Green Street Water Association (R D 165) (No further information - contact Bob Allen) Liberty Park Water Association 7852 Liberty Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R D 282) Attn: R. D. Wilkenson, President (714) 842-8738 Meadowlark 5141 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach CA 92649 (R D 166) Attn: rt Nerio, Owner 4) 840-1122 Moore Mutual Water Company 1.7182 Ash Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R D 272) Attn: Chester Matsen, President (714) 847-9584 Newman Street Water Company 7772 Newman Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (Q D 282) Attn: Everett Fiske, President (714) 847-6913 Ocean View Mutual Water Company 19701 Quiet Bair Lane Huntington Beach CA 92648 (R D 273) Attn: Jack Dotson, President (714) 835-3833 Ocean View School Dristrict 1.6940 "B" Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R I) 263) Attn: Milt Berg, Director Business Support Services (714) 847-2551 x 252 Palmdale Water Company (R D 272) (No further information - contact Bob Allen) PRIVATE WATER ASSOCIATIONS AND/OR WELLS Page Two N ` Parkview Mutual Water Company 16892 "A" Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R D 263) Attn: Mrs. M. B. Files, President (714) 847-4720 Sea Aira Trailer Park 6241 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R D 168) Attn: P.O._Graham and Sons, Owners (714) 847-1121 The Old Pirate Lane Mutual Water Company 16705 Graham Street Huntington Beach CA 92649 (R D 166) Attn: Mari.ane Mineur, Treasurer (714) 846-7340 Wintersburg Water Company , 7572 Washington Street Huntington Beach CA 92647 (R D 262) Attn: Stuart M. O'Guinn, President (714) 842-1465 i r ti -Y: .Y BK 14095PB 887 RECUkGED :REC UFST OF flri 7 ..j,: RINS. Co.� uL ii 1;'; ORDSOF(i: LIFORNI,4Rccoided ai rcqu6tiof,and return to:. ;- 1130 P 8:00A,My, JUNC'oiintY of Omng'e 981 Generl Szrvices Agency LEE A,BReal Estate Division RANCy Reco,�Mi ` P.O.. Box4t0C, Santa A' a.,California 92702 :) Unincorporated area, or (x) City of Huntington Beach t AP N®. 107-81-00 TV NSF;ER TAX $ � r on -lu.l value. Project No. \` f Ice;� ry ccircyed. Project: Ocean View Channel �. Parcel No. 305 -2 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERA" iON, receipt of which ch is hereby ac' knoialedged, ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT do eShereby GRANT to CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH j the real property in the County of Orange; State of Californid, dc6Scribed as _ That 'portion of, th€i 'west half :of the souf_hcase quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 5 South, Range 11 West:, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, city of 6. Huntington Beach,. country of Orange,, state of California, .per. map recorded. in book 51, page 13. of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the. County Recorder of said county, 7 desczibed as follows: 8 Beginning at a, poin,t on the ,cente' rline of Warner Avenue',' as said centerline is shown. on a map of Tract No. 6626, recorded' in book. 249, pages 9 and' 10 of said '9 Miscellaneous Maps, distant S. 890 32' 38" E. , 55.92 feet from the intersection of said Mail Tai Statert;ent to Return Address Abo4 .1& P0270-169t4/771 P4-2 i gK 14 0 9 88 centerline with the southerly prolongation of the centerline of Asari Lane as said 16 intersection. is shown on the map of said tract;. thence at right angles to the. centerline of said Warner. Avenue N. 00 21' 22'.' E. , 57.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve 11 concave northwesterly 'and having a radius of 226.00 feet, a radial line_ of said curve thrbggh, said point bears S. 0° 271 . 22" W. , said curve being concentric with and 26.00 12 feet southeasterly .from- that certain curve cited as being concave northwesterly, having a radius of 200.00 feet; a central angle. of 900 09' OS" and a length of 314.69 feet in 13 ,the deed to the Orange County Flood Control District, recorded February 14, 196.3, ' . in Book 6431, page 936 of Official Records in the office of said County Recorder;, thence 14 northeasterly..262.29 feet along' said durve' through a central'. angle of 660 ,29' 4211; thence S. 890 41'146":E. ,, 16.00 feet to the east line.-of said west half; thence S.00 18' i4" W., 15 192.91 feet, :along said east line, to said cehterline of Warner Avenue, the N. 89 32' 38" W. 223;76 feet along said Centerline- to the point. of beginning. 16 RESERVING therefrom unto Grantor an easement for ingress and egress for access 17 purposes over the east 16.00 feet of hereinabove described land. The grantee herein agrees to provide a gate or gates:, not less. than twenty-five feet (25' ) wide, to allow ingress and egress from Warner. Avenue to District's flood control facilities on the north. { l 5 r -2- u S BK 14095 PG ' 88 Dated.- ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF 4 -VAL THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO By THE AIRMAN OF THE JBOARDo Chairma Boal of Supervisors -e JUNE ALEXANDE,R ' Clerk of. the Board. of Supervisors Orange County F1'ood' Contro.l District STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) sse COUNTY OF ORANGE On this f4i. day of [ � in the years _ before me, nRm F_R1r.C_ (p. personally appeared ,IAt��;. . 5 known to me tote }ANd--C :erk of the Boar. of Supervisors of the County of Orange; saI( board, acting as the governing board of the Orange County Flood Control District; and known to me to .be 'the person who .executed the within instrument on behalf of the Orange County Flood Control District pursuant t;o Government Code Section 25103_, and acknowledged. to me that such political subdivision .executed- the .same' by use of an authorizedfacsimile signature. INAMESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the day and year i n thi s 6�0►� ��►f .aboveoesi n' k�ARf;YN f ',ECtIRO �' (zlitywd OR COUNTY my Comis,on E t,r r is,is OVALS Approved as to' form by Approved as to content Count Counsel on }n Y Environmental Management Agency Y 7 By( ... Description Compare to EMA-approved Description Dated /,3 .5 B IT49-18-1 P4-5.3 BK14095, PG 890 �J ' City �f I- untr� ® each • CALIFORNIA 926 P:o.. BOX. 190 DEED CERTIFICATION This is to, certify that the interest in' reaI property conveyed. by the deed dated April 14, .1981 from Orange County Flood Control District to the City of Huntington Bea.ch:,' a. mun'ici.pal cox oration, is hereby pp accepted by the undersigned of or' agent on behalf of the' City Council of the CITY OF HUNTINGTO$ BEACH, pursuant, to-.the authority conferred- by Resolution No. 3537 of the -City Council of 'the City of Huntington Beach adopted on August 7$ 1972; and the grantee consents to the..recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: May ?19 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ACICIA M. WENTWORM city er By: r C J : �'It�lrv� DM 27 r.. - I i= C: TIC� N � � DISTRICT MAP 24�5- 11 ;r NOFg� y' T ^ ADOPTED FEBRUARY 20. 1461 •• CITY �� CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 817 yNwti rora'4r ` A,r C it r.FN AMENDED ORD. NO. AMENDED RD D:NO LEE pJU 3-20.61 626 1-16-67 1287 9 5-61 867 4 7-69 1486 .vr �����,^ BEACH 11 15 61 B66 2.2 TO 1632 1551 s <LE Ir uE Ltict .t �cT a��J�p t02 -61 877 0_16.72 1778 Lt d c" c'L r c lnsl v.cr I-IS-62 886 3.19-73 1823 rci l orM e s Ess st a,�. 4-2-62 896 3.16-81 2476 �� a,.agJlt ua4L oisT uiL, 5-7-62 900 �-MANGE 265-17-64 10 39 8-6 [Ch�it �NNrnKwf4or ncLxouE sucgaNc 4 L,,uro asl`5N1cxt NCE ttTwtt1056 4 058 rUvTx9 'CALIFORNIA 64 R RU4LaEti CI ASSifCAtgNN AMENDED BY ZONE CASE' 2-7-64 106 L 12-7'64 i106 437'433,470,479,505,fib- 4-5-65 I132 146,163,19<,2L0,21i,217,230.237,3fi6, 51 PP66-1,66.63,67-32,69.33,PP70-8,72-24,73-2,80-16, 12-5-67 1280 SUFFIX LEGEND 1-3-67 1280 - ' ,. ---- ULTIMATE AIGifT Oi Vl4Y , - - SETBACK LINE „-„ a?EC19E FLAN W STNECT ALIGNMENT EDINGER - - AVE. a.sicn4TEs AA,vATE sTar�E is 113 3 C2" C2 �`° R3 STARK AVEry I' R 3 0 - _ 3 i r4 / LR3 -_' - -- -- , 9 LINE Or /2 Nw 1/i SEC -< 'z C5,5 6 2 Z F O Z yU 0 Z 0 W . '- [RI OF RI J u U V LOTSCR'.J I i N45TwG5 Ca z ; O J .. RI RI a RI RI W Rl RI h RI RI RI -RI I a I RI a R.I I o 1 y f 4 r _ �.OI wI . SAVOY CA �LJ Q ; a 3 u NaLD CR. w4GEAs ca BRliSM at DR �RI I U RI R 1 "4° 1 ,_- RI Ri. - .1�D i. RI i aorta ca RIDE vILLE cR: �. 6RYANT, DR RI 1 i RI ____.m e -� _u .I 1 RA;w:y oI C RI RI LAMAR DR' I AegrEa cA. . RI o i I LAMBERT ,w ...._.. DR RI .. I w I RI a 9. RI RI R1 I i C.F E zG RI RI oR.NDa cR O 1 I FERGU30N La J I .. ..) 601G TO C I ( TERFir - DR amAL pa . -- �:RI �. LI RI zq_si °u MOWARD CR 1 i CAMEL fa ^--- �------ E'a a• 10 I RI uJ �� .RI RI Ri U Rli' RI i RI. to Ea. '-'oa_ Z��. w RI Lj l_ r_J sniE RI C" Q LANGA$TER DR. ARNETT DR ARNET OR 1 1 - RI (0)R5 c RI RI RI RI 1 RI R RDUU%- DR U C F——C 0 �C6-2. C C I_ aEnr ca RI C4 SARU CR. RI RI RI ca CC_ G R DC o AERIE CR' . I �W t 04 R3 Y :I a C $ a .w DR RI R1 ❑ I R1. n ca RI. � Rt --� TAMARU ro R3 R3 ca z RI. ANY-7EBa C2 n z j GLASGOW CR'W 1 a R3 _i RI m 1 D a D RI J- !;w V.-- F-7, WARNER AVE P " _ J r -- IN t LI •. 00 , Cil 40 - _ 60' INV : ass _ LY wa•. I FIRST AMER I CAN TITLE I N'_'LIRANCE COMPANY, 114 EAST FIFTH 'STREET (P.O.SOX 26 ) GANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 (714) 558-3211 CITY OF 11UNTINCTON BEACH O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 ATTNs CHARLES DAVIS YOUR NO. (PO: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT) FORM OF POLICY COVERAGE REQUESTED: CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD POLICY- IN RESFI�NSE TO, THE .ABOVE REFERENCED APPLICATION FORA POLICY OF TITLE I kSURANCE, THIS COMPANY HEREBY REPORTS THAT IT IS PREPARED TO IS-SUE, OR CAUSE TO BE ISSUED, AS OF THE DATE HEREOF, A POLICY 'i" T I TLE INSURANCE I N THE FORM SPEC I F I ED- ABOVE, DE`;CR I O I NG THE L (lik'D AND Ti•iE ESTATE i=DR INTEREST THEREIN v4.-RE I NAFTE'nt SET FORTH, I N,`lJR I Nl: P.0AIN�:'.7 LOSS WJH I CH MAY BE: VU`=TA I NED BY F'EASON OF ANY DEFECT, LIEN DR, ENCUMBRANCE NOT SHOWNOt'1 REFERRED TO AS AN EXCEPTION CELOW OR NOT EXCLUDER FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO THE PRINTED SCHEDULES, CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF SAID POLICY FORM. TFI I'.:. REPORT (ANC ANY. SUPPLEMENTS OR -AMENDMENTS THERETO) IS ISSUED �_OL rt:�' F"OFt. Tti PURPOSE: OF FACILITATING THE I^_UANf=E �-F A POL I COY ClF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO L I A.B I L I TY IS ASSUMED HEFd-_EcY.. IF IT T S DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLEINSURANrE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD FEE REQUESTED. tIATED: OCTOBER 6, 19,130 AT 7a 30 A.M f. LEONARD J. 4VAVRA —`TITLE^OFFICER TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, A' DODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC. TH!: ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIQED QR. F:Z':�C'E..RRED TO 'COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: P FEE. AT THE PATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS .TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE. PRINTED EXCEPTIONS. AND EXCLUSIONS CONTAINED IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS F'OL.LOWSr EXHIBIT PAGE 1 1 . AN EASEMENT FOR ROACIS, RAILROADS AND DITCHES OVER THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF SAID LAND; ALSO THE USE AND CONTROL OF C IENEGAS AND NATURAL. STREAM'S OF WATER, IF ANY, NATURALLY UPON, FLOWING Ar.RQSS. INTO OR BY .':AID TRACT, AND THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR AND TO CONSTRUCT IRRIGATION OR 'DRAINAGS DITCHES THROUGH SAID TRACT . TO IRRIGATE OR DRAIN THE !\bJACENT LAND, .AS RESERVED IN DEEDS CIF RECORD.. . THE RESERVATIONS AND AGREEMENTS. IN THE DEED FROM KIYbKO ASARI. rcC:ORDED FEBROARY 14-, 1960, IN BOOK 6431 , PAGE 936, OFFICIAL. RECORDS, WHICH RECITES: r.LSERVING TO THE rRANTOR, HER .SUCCESSORS,. OR ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT TO INSTALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES INTO THE CHANNEL, TO ERI'DGE ANY PORTION OF THE CHANNEL .L.YINO WITHIN THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED PROPERTY, AND THE RIGHT TO. USE SAID BRIDGES. ' AN EASEMENT .AS SET FORTH. IN AN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 269 1969 69 IN BOOK 888,5., PACE 87 'OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, FOR: . STREET, HIGHWAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES. OVER: THE SOUTH 56 FEET OF SAID LAND. 4. IN hC;CORDANi=E WITH DOCUMENTATION. SUPPL.I ED TO Y H I S COMPANY,, IT IS �jLIR* UiNDERSTAND I NG THAT AN EASEMENT: FOR I NGRE S AND: EGRESS FOR AcrE^ PURPOSES OVER THE EAST 16 FEET OF SAID LAND IS TO BE RESEWD FROM ANY .CONVEYANCE HEREUNDER. SAID EASEMENT,, AS RESERVED WILL REFLECT IN ANY POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY THIS COMPANY. i EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 rlE'arP 1 PT I ON ALL THAT CERTAIN ,LAND SITUATED IN T-HE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF HUNT I NGTON PEACH; rlE^_•CR I BED AS FOL LOWS THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF ,OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Sr►Ui'l-it:,AST' QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP r SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LAS E►OLSAw PER MAP RECORDED IN ESQ K 51 , PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAWS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS". r r-i�I NN I NC;. AT A .POINT ON THE CE:NTEf2L I NE OF WARNER AVFNL IE. AS. SAID �.4:NTERL:I NE IS SHOWN ON, A MAP OF TRACT NO., 662-,, RECC'►ripED i N' BOOK 49, PAGES 9 AND 10 ,OF GA I D, M I S►_ELLANEOUS MAPS, D I sTANT. SOUTH S9 L�CG 32•' •C." EAST, 55. 92 FEET FROM THE I NTER!^ECT I ON OF' SA I D `ENTERLINE WITH THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE CENTERL.INE .OF LANE AS SAID INTERSECTION I S- SHOWN ON -THE. MAP OF SAID TRACT i-I TE RNCE AT I GHT, ANGLES TO THE CENTERL I NE OF £:AID WARNER. AVENUE NC-ARTH p DE63. .27`. 22" EAST, E-7. 00 FEET' TO A POINT ON A NON-TANO,ENT CURVE CONCAVENORTHWESTERLY ANo HAVING A RADIUS OF 226.00 FEET, A r AT I A(_ LINE ►=iF SAID CURVE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH O DEG,. 27' 112" WEST, SAID CURVE BEING CONCE'NTRIC WITH AND 26.60. FEET S-01+THEA 1TERt_Y FROM THAT CERTAIN CURVE. C T TED AS BEING CONCAVE ;NCIRTHWETTERLY, HAV I NG A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET,, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF n VEG.. !)r'' 0811 AND A LENGTH OF "314.G9 vEE'T IN THE DrE l) TO THE ftF:f^NC-jE ►rOUNI*rY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, RECORDED F'Ec4,11JARY 14, 1'963 IN 6 4,31 , PAGE '--6 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE- f.1F SAID r,_!rATY. RECORDER,' THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 262. 29 FEET ALON0 SAID CURVE: THIROUG14 A QE NTRAL ANGLE OF 66 ,DEG. 291 42"; THENCE SOUTH 39 DEG. 41 ' 46" EAST, . 16.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE '-Z:r,UTH 0 DEC. 18' 1'$01 WEST, 192.91 FEETv ALONG SAID EAST LINE, TO 'SAID CENTERLINE OF WARNER AVENUE, THENCE NORTH E9 DEG. 321 38" TEST, 22`3.76 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PLATS (ANC C►^&R'O, IF ANY) ENCLOSED. NnTE is ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC RECORD;, THERE ,HAVE BEEN NO DEEDS CONIVEYING .THE PROPERTY IN THIS REPORT WITHIN. SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THIS REPORT EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: NONE. NOTE 2: WE 'ENGL.OSE A COPY OF EXCEPTION #3. EXHIBIT PAGE 3 C.S`TH. 7 7 •- I '•`•' :"t� . .. ..'t:� ::. �(o`er - ! first American Title COMA' Yh s �A�p is for In armation.Orrt`j-And Is Not a Part,r his Title Evidence -6 1 � Q a o` 2 -----, �': `� `� kph V � •' ,- ©.90 L R E ! O ' 20 .00 No 16tu r. . p E - i City of Huntington Beach, P.O. BOX 190� CALIFORNIA 82648 DEED CERTIFICATION I©N This is to certify that the interest. in reel property conveyed by the deed. dated April 14; 1981 from Orange County Flood. Control District to the City of Huntington Beach a municipal corpporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City Council of the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, pursuant to the authority conferred by Resolution No. 3537 of the City Council of the City of Huntington .Beach adopted on August 7, 1972, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated : May 21 , 1981 C IT Y OF HUNT INCTON BEACH ALICIA M. WEI 'a 00fl City MeW . BY: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE* CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF ,. LOMA LINDA SUPPORTING RATIFICATION OF THE PERIPHERAL CANAL REFERENDUM WHEREAS, the increasing possibility of serious water shortages within the next decade is a source of continuing concern to all residents and businesses in the City of Loma Linda. and Southern California; and WHEREAS, the Peripheral Canal would assure a stabilized quality of water not now enjoyed by State Water Project Contractors and. permit Southern California water utilities to commit funds to waste water reclamation, thereby reducing both long term demands for water and. providing insurance against the effects of draught; and" WHEREAS, the City of Loma Linda and attendant municipal entities and representatives is extremely concerned over the failure to start the long--delayed project; and WHEREAS, the Supreme Court has ruled that by 1985, Southern California's supply of water from the Colorado River will be cut in half; and s WHEREAS, thGtimely d wel p mcnt of the Peripheral Cara! p 4[44t iS . necessary to ensure the future orderly growth and development. of the economic base of business and industry in the City of Loma. Linda and Southern California, and once agreement is reached,, it will take many years to complete the work necessary to open such a canal;. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Loma Linda does support the Peripheral Canal Project and does urge all. I voters to also support this project by approving the Peripheral Canal Referendum. RESOLUTION NO. 659 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the Counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, . and Ventura and all cities within these counties. are hereby urged, to go on record in strong support of ratification of the Peripheral Canal Referendum. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Governor is requested and urged to place the necessary measure on a statewide ballot for voter approval at the earliest possible time. ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Loma ` Linda be directed to send a copy of this Resolution to each of the local government entities and counties mentioned above as .well as Governor . Brown, Senator Presley, Assemblyman Leonard and. the League of California Cities. PASSED, ADOPTED AND SIGNED this 14th day of April,, 1981. kayo pro tempofe Attest: Y � 3 � • City., ,C1e R �, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 i OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i June 17, 1981 Assemblyman Nolan Frizzelle 18600.Main Street Suite 210 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held 'Monday, June 15, 1981 adopted a resolution supporting ratification of the Peripheral Canal Referendum. Enclosed is a certified copy of Resolution No. 5007 for your- information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk y. AMW:CB:js Enclosure Telephone:714-536-5227) �, ��. t +'• 4t.5)UNCE•S AGENCY £DMUPID G. BROWN 1 Gov or ti !�,K1:��U41 OF WATER RESOURCES Pia 114s. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Wentworth: The Governor's copy of Resolution No. 5007 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, supporting the Per pheral Canal and asking that the referendum election on Senate Hill 200 be held as soon as possible, has been referred to me for reply. No date for the referendum has yet been set, but we appreciate your writing to express your interest. . Sincerely, Ronald B. Robie Director ....r ._,.,...,, -... _... ,/.^.\- _... .., ... fi;x.f _.�"" 5, .el..a•`/;�X^k.�PiTf."'p`:r`:Y'n+.s'S7i" / \ 1 COWATTEES CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS a l l f o r n a it je g s l a t u r�e (VXX-C ARMMI) M 11 1'4!NIA .�:�;;+�+i ELECTIONS AND REAPPORTIONMENT 1•19%' '+,7 BANKING AND C0MKERCE STATE SENATOR JOINT COMMITTEE ON STATE'S ECONOMY i°1 JOHN G. SCHMITZ PLEASE REPLY TO: THIRTY-SIXTH DISTRICT y� ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES D DISTRICT OFFICE t rw CI CAPITOL OFFICE ,3tune 25, 1981 Miss Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington, California 92648 Dear Thank you for sending me a copy of Resolution No. 5067 on behalf of the Huntington Beach City Council supporting ratification of the Peripheral Canal Referendum. As I am sure the Council is aware, I coauthored SDI 200 last Session which authorized the building of the canal and: I am certainly anxious that the project proceed on schedule. Unless the Legislature enacts a bill providing for a special election--or the Governor calls for such an election--the . referendum will appear on the June 1982 ballot. Please be assured that I shall continue to do whatever I can in behalf of this important water link between the north and south. o Again, thank you for notifying me of the Council's position. Sincerely, ;;O�HNG.. SCHMITZ Senator, 36th District � _a. uJ L.kr•'sl t, v !;r11I- Y AMERICAN O O SOCIETY OM % n tt los angeles section 1914 i� t� APRIL 1982 The Federal Central Valley Project and ' r the California State Water Project both } ; PRESIDENT'S COLUMN use Central Valley streams and Delta waterways to transfer project waters to pumpng lants eastt1SanpFranciscopBaynarea,t f the' Santa Clara Valley, the San Joaquin Valley, by the Antelope Valley and southern ` Berton R. California. Because of its location *, on the edge of the San Francisco Bay system, g Bradley Y , significant changes in. the Delta i can affect the Bay system as well, and AM ° WHEREAS the current method of water trans- fer across the Delta adversely affects water quality in the Delta and State fish and wild- life resources. -The Delta channels, developed by man-made _ levees, carry water from the Sacramento The following resolution is presented for and San Joaquin Rivers westward to Suisun your review and comment. Bay, and ultimately the Pacific Ocean. Water transfers into the Federal and RESOLUTION State pumping plants cause the original CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL westward flow pattern to be overridden OF by a strong north-to-south pattern. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS The heavy pumping at these. plants creates POSITION ON PERIPHERAL CANAL a "pumping sink", a zone within which ADOPTED FEBRUARY 6, 1982 all water flows toward the pump intakes, in the South Delta. This change inflow WHEREAS the Sacramento - San Joaquin pattern adversely affects water quality Delta is a valuable asset to California from in the Delta. an economic and environmental standpoint and assets of the Delta affected by water There are.several reasons for the decline transfer include: in water quality. The southerly flow Agriculture. Delta soils although subject forms an effective hydraulic barrier across a. A g g some channels, resulting in stagnation to annual losses through erosion and and reduced dissolved oxygen levels in oxidation, are among the finest agricul- these channels. The stagnation also tural soils in the world. increases aquatic growths which, upon decay, increase tastes and odors in the b. Recreation. The miles of Delta waterways water and further reduced dissolved oxygen and the fish and wildlife resources levels. The southerly flow also follows associated with the Delta provide an channels with .insufficient hydraulic outstanding recreational area accessible capacity to carry the transfer water, to major population centers of northern resulting in some erosion of levees and California. channels and increasing suspended solids loads. The changes in flow regime also it c. Fish and wildlife resources. The Delta allow sea water to move further inland is a major fishery, a home for wildlife during periods o low Delta and an important component of the Pacific often resultinginexce outflow,excessive salinities Flyway, and in water supplies withdrawn from the WHEREAS the Delta is a focal point. for Delta. water supplies in the state since water is Cont. , page three transported through. the Delta to water defi- cient areas of the San Francisco Bay region, the San Joaquin Valley and. southern California. PAGE ONE President's Column Continued -Large scale water transfe.rs under -- ------------- existing conditions are creating serious problems, as discussed above. However, The current, water transfer method also as a practical reality, such water creates problems for the fish and wildlife transfers must continue. Therefore, who live in or, pass through the Delta. a properly designed, constructed and By far, the major fish problems associated operated peripheral canal is the most with the water transfer program are the reasonable solution to mitigate the entrapment of juvenile fish and eggs in Delta problems discussed above. the pumps withdrawing water from the Delta I and the disruption of the migratory pat- 2. That the U.R. Bureau of Reclamation and terns of anadromous fish. Screening of the California Department of Water juvenile fish has been partly successful, Resources should adopt a long-term agree- but as yet, many species and most eggs ment for coordinated operation of such a cannot be screened. In addition, the reduced dissolved oxygen levels have peripheral canal. caused localized fish kills, bank erosion Because both the U.S Bureau of Reclama- has decreased some wildlife habitat and tion and the California Department the resultant sediment load has reduced of Water Resources pump water, from small fish survival. the South Delta, coordinated operation of any peripheral canal is a practical Another major problem for fish can be and logical necessity. reduced Delta outflow during critical times of the year. Delta water, quality standards 3. That the agreement should also provide contained in State Water Resources Control for coordinated operation of the Central Board Decision D1485 are intended to Valley Project and the State Water Project prevent excessive depletion of Delta and for maintenance.of water quality outflows during these critical periods, in the Delta and San Francisco Bay as and required by the State Water Resources WHEREAS studies 'of these effects illustrate Control Boar I d. the need for an improved Delta fresh water -. Under State law, the ultimate arbiter transfer method, and the transfer method with of water, quality needs in the Delta is the greatest potential to minimize these the State Water Resources Control Board. effect is a properly designed and operated It would be illogical for the Bureau peripheral canal. of Reclamation and the Department of Water Resources to formulate differing Studies by State and Federal agencies operational criteria. have indicated that a canal directly connecting the Sacramento River in the This statement may be quoted or reprinted only North Delta with project pumping plants in its entirety and onl.y with the permission in the South Delta - the peripheral canal of the California State Council of. the American concept - could reduce the foregoing Society of Civil Engineers. problems. Water releases from the canal at strategic locations could restore natural flow directions, flush stagnant areas, eliminate the "pumping sink" in the South Delta, reduce; the hydraulic overloading of channels and control salt water incursions past Sherman Island. LEROY C:RANDALL ELECTED VICE-PRESIDENT ACEC Fish screening at the intake and proper —--- operational procedures may be able to LeRoy Crandall, President of LeRoy Crandall control pumping of fish and eggs into the and Associates, Consulting Geotechnical Engineers, aqueducts. Satisfactory fish screening was recently elected Vice President of the and operational procedures are currently American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC) for under study. a one year term beginning May 1982. Because a peripheral canal could also transport significant quantities of fresh CONVERSE C0NSUh'1'ANTS NAMES NEW DIRECTOR water around the Delta, proper design and --- --- — ,a operating of the canal are key issues. Thomas J. Scheil, a managing vice president Proper design and operation must include of Converse Consultants, has been elected to the maintaining sufficient fresh water in the Fi.rm's Board of Directors. Scheil will. continue Delta to preserve its environmental and , economic resources as well as efficiently to manage the company's Anaheim, California office, transferring water to pumping plants and where he -is responsible for all phases of improving the quality of the transfer geotechni-cal investi.;ati.ons, personnel water; therefore requirements and marketing,. Scheil, his wife. Renee, and their four children, live in Anaheim BE IT RESOLVED the California State Council hills, California of tnt 4merican Society of Civil Engineers adopts the following position on the Peripheral MARK E. BRYAN'1' NAMED SENIOR GEOLOGIST Hark Canal, a key element of SB 200: ----- BRYA---NAMED-SENIOR E. Bryant has been promoted to the 1 . That, because water transfer, is to Conti- position of Senior Geologist for Converse nue, a peripheral canal with the necessary Consultants. lie will continue to supervise environmental safeguards should be designed geologic staff members and projects throughout and constructed as soon as possible. `Southern California, working out of the firm's Anaheim, California office. Bryant and his wife Diane live in Mission Viejo, California. i 1 . . . . 111t . . . . . . . . . . . . . il . . . . . . . . . . . l 4 PAGE: '1'IIRE.I? rt� q„ S t z+ California is in deepening trouble with its water supply. ; r � "� � The first phase of the State Water Project still has not been completed despite the expenditure of$2.5 billion over the past This booklet was prepared by the Association of State Water Project Agencies,a public agency 'xy; ', 20 years. involving 17 water agencies in California with More particularly, construction of the long proposed and long contracts to receive water from the state water ` ; 1 studied Peripheral Canal around the delta of the Sacramento and Project. These agencies represent many , ,m -k San Joaquin rivers still has not started. geographic areas of the state—one is in the41 , North Bayarea near San Francisco,two are in Construction of the canal will not solve California's water the South Bay,three in the San Joaquin Valley, � tu� problems but it will be of immeasurable help. four in the Southern California desert region �� � �� �° f It will help alleviate the overdraft of groundwater pumping in and seven on the Southern California coastal � � �� �� � � p g p p g � ' the San Joaquin Valley and also provide the farmers of that rich plain. The association was formed in 1971 to provide factual information on the Peripheral agricultural area with some of the additional water they are Canal,the missing link of the State Water counting on in future years. Project. i For additional information or additional It will help offset groundwater pumping in Santa Clara and copies of this booklet, lease write to: p please Association of State Water Project Agencies Alameda counties and meet urban needs in those areas. �*,,��,�x�<�� ,�� _, � �, clo Santa Clara Valley Water District �x��t�� �fi��"���� ;�, �'�� It will help make up for the loss of more than half their Colorado 5750 Almaden Expressway �5 ., � � =�. ' River supply in a few short years for the more than 125 cities on the San Jose, CA 95118 coastal plain of Southern California. And it will meet the water needs and protect the quality of the ;� r 1 water used in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta itself. California's I S S 1'�4 G r uz 4 . a3� �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OVERSIZED DOCUMENT ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK • Sacramento 4 i f �Qy �Q • Hood o� An aveiMew • Napa ° The Delta c a) 738,000 acres,total jciF Q 550,000 acres,irrigated agriculture 700 miles of waterways Fairfield 1,100 miles of levees • The Peripheral Canal �t Will be an earthen channel,not Sd%sun Marsh,� Q�`J 'O concrete-lined d Rio Vista • Side slopes will be planted with Ill 'A grass, shrubs, native trees 0 Recreation will include fishing, 0 hiking,boating m 43 miles long, 30 feet deep • Vallejo �aota 400 feet wide at water surface 12 water release structures @M F@N@[3E r 3 siphons under Mokelumne, San Joaquin,and Old rivers urg• n • ch • California Aqueduct • Z Main canal of the State Water Martinez Contra Costa Canal Project Completed in 1971 Stockton South Bay Aqueduct Branch of the California Aqueduct Completed in 1963 Delta-Mendota Canal Lar`ray Clifton Court Forebay Ua11eeSt canal Pro ectof the federal Central 9G Y ] Completed in 1951 Pumping Plants Contra Costa Canal �. First unit of the federal Central Valle Project • Oakland South Bay Aqueduct •Tracy �^ Completed in 1940 1 • San Francisco Califor is Aqueduct Delta-Mendota Canal �taty of Lififornin i GOVERNOR'S OFFICE y •� SACRAMEN F0. CA 9S8 14 , --- pGEORGE DEUKMEJIAN (916) 445-0 28 2 Il I r l GOVERNCR 113 June 12, 1984 TO: CITY MAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS RE: GOVERNOR DEUKMEJIAN'S WATER.PROGRAM As you are aware, Governor Deukmejian has proposed a plan to make more surplus water available to users, while improving water quality and strengthening our protection of the environment and areas of origin. Many questions and comments have been received concerning this subject. I have enclosed some information which specifically pertains to how the.plan would affect your area. Governor Deukmejian's water program was designed specifically to benefit all regions of California, and do it at less than half the cost of the Peripheral Canal. The cost of improving the Delta transfer facilities will be paid solely by those who use the water, not the taxpayers. Delta levees will be restored, alleviating the flood problems we've had in recent years which not only threaten life and property, but adversely affect water quality. In addition, North State fisheries will be rehabilitated. Greater storage capacity south of the Delta, as well as conservation and desalination, will be achieved. And, the laws protecting the areas of the origin wil.be strengthened with a constitutional amendment. . Guaranteeing Northern Californians first priority for their own water over exports is a fundamental premise of the Governor's program. Finally, sometimes lost in the current discussion,of water is that an uninterrupted and affordable water supply is essential for economic growth. . This program will allow California to provide enough jobs for our expanding population. These jobs are needed in all regions of California. I would ask that the mayor of each city make available this letter and information to the other members on the city council. Corc .ally, USTON T. CARLY JR. Assistant to the Go rn r for Local Govern. _nt Affairs HTC iad ELEMENTS OF INTEREST TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN THE ADMINISTRATION WATER LEGISLATION PACKAGE 1 . The plans for Delta water transfer (SB 1369-Ayala) represent a practical and cost-effective approach for Eroviding _additional water and improving water quality. j; A. During the next 25 years, the service areas of the State Water Project will require an additional 1 .3 million acre-feet of water a year. The Administration program will meet that need through a combination of Delta facilities, off-stream storage, salvage of water , and interim . purchase .of water from the federal Central Valley Project. (1) By the end of 1985 ,., the Central Arizona Project will be operational, triggering the most severe of losses by The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to water rights from the Colorado. River, losses of more than 650 ,000 acre-feet .a year. (2) During the next 25 years,, California's population is expected to grow by 10 million people,. half of them residing in .southern _..�..✓ California. (3) The proposed plan is cost-effective because it will . be built in a staged, step-by-step manner. B. This legislation also authorizes State Water Project storage underground in southern California. This storage will assure water delivery south of the Tehachapis even in severe droughts similar to 1976 and 1977 , or immediately following damage to the aqueduct system in an earthquake or other disaster. C. Due to improved circulation in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the quality of water delivered to southern California will be improved. 2. A loan program is established under AB 3626 (Areias) ,. funded by tidelands oil funds, to help local agencies construct locally-operated grouted water r.echare facilities. Appropriation the first year- is $7, million. A revolving fund. will receive payments made by agencies on their loans. 3. Under the Flood Control Bond Act of 1984 (SB 1648-Nielsen) , $100 million will be provided (A) for more prompt reimbursement of local land,, easement and right of way costs on federally built flood control projects, (B) to increase state participation, and (C) for leans to local agencies to repair these works 4 . Fisheries will be enhanced in' the Delta (SB 1369 and AB 3542-'Katz)., coastal waters (SB 1500-Keene) , and inland waters (S13 1359 and SB 1500) . %1any southern Californians use these facilities for recreation purposes. 5. ...The transfer. of water through the Delta will be protected by SB 2196 (Boatwright) , which provides $10 million a year to help local agencies in Delta levee maintenance and restoration. r- FIL-33 r,«• + April 28, 1958 RE-0 PRIVATE WATER C OMPANYS 1, Huntington Crest--- -- Dyke Water Co, Garden Grove Supt. , Duke Rezac---- 11065 Penn Ave,, Le. 9-2176 G. Grove Capacity-- 5,000 gal, -- 30 HP Motor Well 6"------ pressure 40-6. Static Pressure -- - 50# Mains --- 6t1 --- Col-de-Sac 4" *"dell out put 450 gpm Services - 163 Meters --- None -->- $3.50 per mo. Map on file this office. 2. Boulevard Gardens dater Co. Pres. Obie Moore----- 7852 McDonald Ave. Ph. 6-2404 Sec. Treas, Mrs. Treece 7742 Alhambra St, Ph. State Permit ---- No map Storage cap. 5,000 gal. Well 4" --- & 611 bowl Wells 2-12" 1-10 HP Motor, depth 266, Mains 4" looped down Alhambra & Silver. St. Hydrants 11--311 risers -- 2211 outlets Alhambra & Glencoe each have 3 hydrants. Services 120 ---- flat rate $3.00 per. mo. 3. Ocean View So. of Wintersburg, Est. of #39 Hi Way Press Fred Swartz-----17022 A-St, Storage --- 750 gal. - Motor 5 HP - - Map none Mains 411 --- 2 risers 11-1t Press. 18-44# State Permit Services 29 - $1.50 per me. 4� Park View Mutual Water Co. N. of Wintersburg, Est, of 39 Hi Way Pres. Joe Welchel 16911 A-St. Storage 1000 gal. - - Motor 3 HP --- No maps Hydrants 3<-12" la"heads. Well 7" --" depth 200 State Permit ----- Services 12 ----- $1.50 per mom F Mains 2" 5. Ocean View Mutual Water Co. West of #39 South of Wintersburg. Moore Mutual Mgr. Murdock Employee of Ocean View School 17062 Oak St. Storage 1-3,006 gal. tank -,- 15 HP Motor 410 outlet from storage tank Mains ??? 3-1211 resers - 12" head. Map - - None Well 1 -- 470p Press. none for fire Services 73 State Permit --m- yes. 6. Ocean View School Pres. R. D. Landrum. 12822 Pearce, Garden Grove Storage 1,000 gal. Motor 5 HP 2" Main School ONLY Well 10" --- pressure. 20-40# 7. Liberty Park rater Assoc. Mgr. Mr. Broughton, 7851 Liberty St. Clarence Lewis Storage 2--2$000 tanks Motor 15 HP Mains 42 1e Map None Hydrants -~- 6 Well depth1831 ft. 1091 X 6" bowl - ---q outlet 4" Press. 25-40# - -- dater 55" level pump 80 ft. Services 53 ---•--- $2.00 per mo. State Permit. 8. Liberty Park --"- Est. of #39 between Newman-& Slater Streets. Mgr. Ross Cowling 17692 H. B. Blvd. Storage 1,000 gal. ' Press. 22-44 lb&. 21" mains Hydrants 3 located on Cameron St.. Map None Well 6" 22" outlet depth ®- 1651 State Permit Services ---- 25 $3.25 per mo. 9. R. J. Carry Track ®b hest of Hi Way #39, South of Newman Street. Pres. Ed Tayloe 7902 Wst. Newman St,, Storage 1,000 gal. Mains 2" Hydrants -.-- None Map None. well 3001 deep -- -- 3" outlet from well Motor 5 HP Services 18 ----s- $2.50 per mo. $50.00 for new connection. State Permit ??? t: 10. Preston, White & Rice etl. Storage 3,000 gal. Map --- None Mains 2" Motor 5 HP Well - - 4" outlet -Services -a--d-p 7 Shares 7 on the 15 acres. State Permit ??? Location of well 330`, west of H. B. Blvd. , 66o" North of Slater in rear of Wm. Prestons .residence. t ill Wintersburg Community Water Forks Sec;Treas. -"m bars. F. M. Rangel 620 Hartford St,, Hunt, Bch, Lex. 6-4172 This well is located South of Wintersburg Ave., East of RR Services --- 26 .750 per mo, She has no information on the well at all. 12, New Junior Hi School ®-- North of* Wintersburg Ave., end of "B" St. Mgr. Jake Stewart Stewart°'s Grocery Well --- 10" Storage 4,000 gal Pump cap, 2500 gal ??? Main 4" to Fire Hydrant "1" only Jones 4 X 22 X 22 Motor 25 'HP 20 acre plot (School) State Permit ??? 13. Liberty Park - - Owner Mr. Sturgeon -- Or. Co. Ceramic Tile Co. Mr. Taylor Lex. 6-6446 (Edison Co.) Well. --- 1 Services --- 6 --- $4..00 per mo, Location Slater Ave. , Est. of Gothard, No, side of Street. State Permit Ak, 1 nest.-,, . and ccnstructi oaa 1 in 6ene r l con#'e�z' t tot the requirements of the' uay.y.for•nia State. Dap�rt1fleM of �ubl.ia Hea2th and the Ora f e Cot ,y Health Departmenko, be ix lacooid c41th the best water: w6rks engineering practipe and .:the recommendatio-as of the California Section of the American Water WorRs Assoc.i..tion. The connection to was been..'de.s geed and built to provide adeq ia.tp flow to fulfill. o61nraitments, to control pressures ou delivery d to deter this Source of suPpl,y® Walls will be constructed to prevent, Ansofar as possible, contamination from, outside sources and in accbrdmd'e with best water WO :s T" Gu 'Jeworks f Storage reservolrs will, be des ed strugtural saf-e 9nd WLI1 be pr£?�'oe to from out,ide co ta[t3 3'lc. tion end t,�xiauthor�Zei�, 6eGGw s ' Pumpiaag equipment, both deep well e d booster, will be nstra2 led .to 'uxraz �1 r adequ Kt stt ,ply cif` Via,ter to ca npl� with + frog►`See fA' d y sailtery or structural .hazards. Povger soure,es and vat vyng ot-trol will also GUnforu4 to these Sta.ndard.s z6d' to the best e�lg—eri practice All pipe llf�es in the system will, be designed and coy,- -to truc to d to c onf br�t to anyal G ah1 : �'ec , WWP, i�S t, t,�S'I`��, and Ada-v1A speoific .tions. Valves will be to VAIA atanda.rd Specif loc'—'tign y ' Ask Gemral 3j)e o i f I ca t I oxi rage 2 Sources will all be,metered. as,. t.,iey eater tie system w3d suop , will be entlro�y. itetered. at point of :ser rioe� Pipe lines, pumping. A,- stallati.ons , reservoirs a=d wells vri11 be rais1nfeeted subbeque-at to construction and prio- to use as a -p5art of "he water sys tern, 'Adequate chlorimtion. e u9 parent will be at reservoirs and/or :wells a (I pumping installations_to insure a potable :Supply coz f'ormi. to. USPHS Dr`iiakin& Water . Standards. Provisions -will- also be made for .emer exiey chlori_nation or dis In- fectiong cords s and maps 1AI11. be maintained of .all col.-Istrueti011 and installations .on ar. as built basis n adequC.te staff will be recruited ana/or trained to properly oper�ete and ,nbintaixi the system aad to provide emPr envy service at e11 t'irues e r _ Two water sovrees *ire presently proposed for the system# A present 21-iboh -coralec•tLon to the ;.W. soft we-ter lines with F' an authoriza,tion .f'or 8.28 c. f'.s. flow will be,. for a time- at leu'st, the primary source, The other source and one w-Aah. mEiy become of major importance In 4he loxi& term pro6ram will be tthe devel.opmcnt of a. multiple well supply in the northwestern area, of the City. Reservoir oa.paci.ty to provide uYa utiliz :tio a of the t ^ter sources azid to .provido emery zcy supply- will be provided in " o loop.tio S) one An the iiorthwes ter''s.y sec tIOn izi ttie `crene',C al viol-nAty of Bo sq avenue and Graham St-rest, ozd the oth(.--r to the s •.«hcs3 t In the vic:tni3 y of Garfield eld A renue a.nd unti %tool reach Elvd. (Rt. 39) m lhese locations axe 'noted on the accoiiipanylng map as is the major distribut-lon net e2id the ser'vsce. Sites for reser°vnir constrv--ti.on, with. 1_•rovi;lon for probable total expainsio-n., arad well field sites' will be secured as . ra.p3 it� `.-Ossi:le:, Construction of a 1,000,000 giE,1, reservoir wLth neces- sary booster -ouop capaci l yr and chl or,lna�lQa equipment will be in. � r the iYAtial d.evelop.ment to ccxe- for the 48 hour mainte-nanoe and repair QLit f's. �'x pe^ted- by oa :ile Ir f e'eder 11 ac end to pro- vide li.xi.ted service, in event of emergency outages in., this s•-,urce as well as to arr�jellt all sources for fire stt:,oply, he ,rAa jor (1 istributl on 'syste!4, as-. shQifn on the accompa,n-j- ' p x ll_ provide .f'or, .dPqu c c me tic , ir+c i fits: 1 e -ad. fIre service, v1ithin the aria to be served,. 'by •tbe ad.diti.,on Q ' the :: . subsi lw,y distr.ib tic?i of service lines, Proviso on is also Maup, fear, capac I ty in, tho ma j O4, system to 'case for- ,a pi,obabl e expan- s ion of the City. Tiie di s tr i.bu tt on sys t rq, as Shovni the map, wi1l' be laid. as service, is required i.:.n sp,e,clf'ic :ire,s Pumpin6 instal.la.tio�as at wells "nd. .reservoirs will be des.ip_ d to provide adequate flows, arid. presscdres In the' system :yid by, pressure valves ''the secti:oll,will be, coordinated..to, this ® ' Valve Axistallation Vill be desIFned to properly control the system and to provide limited areas of' izaterrupted serui e due to breakages, in the system. Teri l 1.1 ri of wells, iris tal la.f.lon of addit of .l pu npi:. , ea id chlorinatioxi equipnient and oor.structA on of iurt ie�r� ,reser'voir cap<.city wi1.1 be on as Incremental basis deter.A_ied .by actual ;and Prov.islous for emergency ccormectia s will be worked out vilt}7 aio�n net water service ur,tt:s on ,a mutua.1 basis to rcavide for a potable wa.te,4­ source In'"tercfiange betweei ,ajencies Lmder* a state, of emerge;ricyo AM services Ill.- Vie- nietered acid necessary steps will be taken to prevent or correct for possible GJ:"oss-Coirnection contaw- r 'Ian of Development, A c ijipetent cz�d adequate staff •gill 'be available to. case for maintenance and operra.tion ,uader a pr i al operati cod - c4ition$ �S we3 l .aa f4z^ em�r�ex1cy �er�r ce Wit. all* tines Fun pis are aval:lable' for the .IAI it a, devel,opm6,at of the distributioli system and reaervgir', cap Ity. end further finan.cin will be arrapged.' to meet system. doamands, ixa the .cltyl s growths `De.talled f,--ogineerin �u'id economin, studles -will be con- tinued to chant development of the `systea, City o _uiit*�� �►.��� Beach Jr $ California k ' 1 Adam's Morgan, Latham, KriWright Suite C, Morgan Building 3632 Long Beach Boulevard Long .Deach 7, California Gentlemen: ` be_ r gpes:t made by your company regarding a preference fdr:softened or uns6f tened: filtered water by the City of anti .-ton each from the Dien er filtration plant was presented to. the City Council of the City of Huntin;t;on Beach .at their regular meeting held Mondays April. 2, l 62, The Council, by minute action, unanimously expressed their preference for softened. filtered water to be supplied by your f cility4 If you wish to receive a certified copy of this minute action, Tease advise us. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones ' City Clerk' PCJ :ed cc Crane County Municipal Water District i I May 20, 1969 ft i , � r Orange County Municipal Water District P.O. Box 1982 Santa Ana, California 92702 Attentions Mr. David A. Boyle General Manager Gentlemen: 1 ® The City- Council of Huntington Beach, at its regular meeting held Monday, May 19, 1969, adopted Resolution No. 2993 opposing use of funds by the Orange County Municipal Water District for construction of storage facilities which would -hot be beneficial to all entities of said District. We are ene osi.ng herewith a copy of Resolution No. 2993 for your iAformation. Sincerely yours, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By sistant ty�erk ".,._ PCJ:EDsaw Enc. r' 1 '. a i MEMORANDUM TO: Doyle Miller, City Administrator FROM. Director of Public Works DATE: October 31, 1967 SUBJECT: Delaware bake You requested an estimate of cost to fence the right of way of the lake located between Delaware and Huntington and between Utica and. Yorktown. At the present time the level of the lake is down and the water does not reach the street right of ways After the winter rains the level will rise and the water will definitely reach Huntington right of way and at times will reach Delaware right of way. It would take approximately 110 feet of fencing along Huntington to fence off the water exposure from the public right of way. Additionally it could take as much as 400 feet of fencing along Delaware to .fence off the water exposure from the public right of way. At the rate of $2 .00/foot for chain link fencing, it could therefore cost as much as $1, 02.0 to fence Delaware Lake at its high- est level from the two public rights of way® Transmitted is a sketch showing the outline of the lake in an average condition. Under these conditions the lake projects onto Huntington right of way but does not touch Delaware right of way. ' es R. Wheeler r Director of Public Works JRW®HEH:ae Trans. i i i i wry- 43 . .. �, _ .. _ �� ti - �� +y � •E � ��� .. - _ -LL-11 A- fir_ - • .� � . . .. - , J - r January 17, 1968 i P t f Roger. S. Watson Scottco, Inc. . 2210 Private Road Newport Beach, California Dear Hr. . Watson: �VThe City Council of Huntington Beach, at their regular, / meeting held Monday, January 15, 1968, considered your request for" a study of the possibility of construction `. D of a City water main with fire hydrants on the west t side of Beach Boulevard from Edinger Avenue to Heil.. Avenue. Council referred your request to the City Administrator to develop data regarding the possible formation �of an " Assessment District for water, drainage and sewer improvements in the area. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ s aw �. a t f�A6+C OUI 1 Y .. DIRECTORSg• �o r^g �'+�p~p�'q / OFFICERS C li—N���r..m� �, vw� {ER� Ia: 1 IC 1• / CLEM M. MC COLL_OCH D A V I D K. J O N E S _--- —1+�. —/ , GERALD E. PRICE THOMAS' S. MADDOCK CLEt+t M.• MC COLLOCH 412 SOUTH LYON STREET P.O. BOX 1982 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 PHONE: 541.2431 AREA CODE 714 GLENN P. ALLEN WINTH ROP O. GORDON W. B. H.ELLIS Attorney David A. Boyle . Secretary-Manager Apri 14, 1968 City of Orange East Orange County Water District Irvine Ranch Water District Costa Mesa County Water District 10oulton-Niguel Water District 'Orange County Waterworks District No. 4 y,City of Huntington Beach _ Enclosed is a tabulation of estimated operation and maintenance costs for fiscal year. 1967-68 for the East range County Feeder No. 2. You will note that the .estimate is the same as last year's. The actua I bill for these costs will be presented to you the last part of July 1968 and will be payable at-that time. David A. Boyle General Manager _ Is Encl. L FISCAL YEAR 1967-68 EAST ORANGE COUNTY FEEDER NO. 2 - ESTIMATED OCMWD DISTRIBUTION OF OPERATION .& MAINTENANCE COSTS Reach 1 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach .4.. � Tota 1 Operation & Maintenance $24,604.46 $6,056.48 $4, 163.83 $3,028.25 $37,853.02 . Costs by Reach 65% 16% 11% 8% 1000/0 City of Orange 2, 100.48 243.71. - - 2 344. 19 3.537% 4.024% East Orange County 2,400.41 505.47 - - 2,905.88 Water District 9.756% 8.346% "Irvine Ranch Water District 6, 151 , 12 11,612.42 1 ,376.77 1 ,923.82 11 ,064. 13 25'.000% 26.623% 33.065% 63.529% Costa Mesa County 1,350.29 353.94 302.21 641 .26 2.,647.70 'Water District 5.488% 5.844% 7.253% 21 . 176% Moulton-Niguel 6,751 .22 1,769.77 1 ,511 .05 10,01) Water District 27.439% 29.221% 36.290% Orange County Water Works 2,250.32 589.90 503.70 - 3,343.92 District No. 4 9. 146% 9.740% 12.097% Cit Y of Huntington Beach 750. 19 196.65 167.89 356.27 1 ,471 .' 3.049% 3.247% 4.01) 1 1 .765%° Orange County Municipal 2,850.43 784.62 302.21 106.90 4,044. 16 Water District 11 .585% 12..955% 7.258% 3.530%° Total Cost by Reach $241604.46 $6,056.48 $4, 163.83 $31,028.25 $37,853.02 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 4-4-68 O� tN - '�` qy CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT r � G,��R�� A•`�O� Huntington Beach, California FC�U�N G� February 20, 1968 [INFORMATION ONLY ORICSTO COUNCIl. a/6- Honorable Mayor and City Council '�` - City of Huntington Beach I Attention: Doyle Miller City Administrator Subject: Annual Report for 1967 Water Department Gentlemen: i Transmitted herewith is the annual report of the Huntington Beach Water Department for. the calendar year January 1 to December 31, 1967. During the calendar year of 1967 the Water Department produced from i eight wells 3,534,831,648 gallons of water. The-City purchased 1,187,726,895 gallons of water from the West Orange County Water Board and the Orange County Municipal Water District making a total of 4,722,558,543 gallons of water produced and purchased. The average consumption for the year 1967 was 148 gallons of water per day per person, with the peak day averaging 252 gallons per person per day on July 28, 1967. The Peck Reservoir, with a capacity of 16,500,000 gallons, was completed I, during the last year which increases reservoir storage to 20,500,000 gallons. I Huntington Beach Well No. 4 was completed and put into service on July 23, 1967 at a cost of $62,000.00. Since the start of operation well i No. 4 has produced 2,500 gallons of water per minute twenty-four hours per day. Well No. 4 will save enough money over purchased water to pay back the $62,000.00 in one year. j With our present eight water wells and the three Metropolitan Water Department connections the City has a production of 31,500 gallons per minute plus the reservoir booster supply which can add 14,000 gallons per minute making a total of 45,500 gallons of water per minute. Water mains from four inch (411) through thirty-six inch (36,,) added to the present system amounted to 56,052 feet. In the downtown area 4,000 feet of two inch (211) water mains in the downtown area were replaced with six inch (611) mains. Total mileage of theppresent system at the end of the year Honorable Mayor and City Council February 20, 1968 Page 2 amounted to 268.5 miles of pipe lines. Also added to the present system were 118 fire hydrants, 151 valves and 1,036 new water services and meters making a total of 25,373 services. During the year the employees of' the water department started installing services above two inch (2") and also fire hydrants which were installed by contract prior to this year. The water department maintains a complete meter repair shop which repairs all water meters when needed. The department also maintains a complete line of material for water main repairs up to 16" in size. Valve operation and checking of fire hydrants were also started this year. This plus other improvements in the system should reduce the Pacific Fire Rating Bureau Grade 3 to Grade 2 for the water system in the next grading. The water department has had a study prepared by James Montgomery Engineers for telemetering the water system along with the sewer pump stations and the storm drain pump stations. This system would record in one central location which pumps are running, record pressure, operate pumps and boosters and show any malfunctions of any pumps in the system by a recorded alarm. Very truly yours, James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works E. R. Stang Water Superintendent JRW:ERS:ae i RANGE OUNTY DIRECTORS OFFICERS '\ IVIUNICI!�� LATER (STRICT CLEM M. MC COLLOCH DAVID K. JONES President GERALD E. PRICE DAVID A. BOYLE 412 SOUTH LYON STREET P.O. BOX 1982 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 Gowrnl hlnnnger CLEM M. MC COLLOCH Secretnn-1'rensnrrr GLENN P. ALLEN PHONE: 541-2431 AREA CODE 714 WINTHROP O. GORDON W. S. HELLIS Attorney June 24, 1969 City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention Mr. Paul C.. Jones City Clerk This is to acknowledge receipt of your resolution No. 2993. It was received and filed by the Orange County Municipal Water District rd of Directors at their regular meeting held on June 18, 1969. David A. Boyle General Manager Im i RANGE OUNTY " .: , DIRECTORS R OFFICERS ST = CLEM M. MC COLLOCH DAVID K. JONES Pnslisnt GERALD E. PRICE DAVID A. COYLK ._ CLEM M. MC COLLOCH 412 SOUTH LYON STR[[T P.C. Rolf I94112 SANTA ANA.,CALI►DRNIA 92702 Gemiul Alawager Seeretasv-7'reatNrrr GLENN P. ALLEN PHON2: 541.2431 ARIA COD[7t4 WINTHROP O. GORDON • - W. B. HELLIS AftO7sy June 2, 1969 r / Mayor Jack Green I / City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 4 Huntington Beach", CA 92648. The Orange County Municipal Water District is currently undertaking a study to develop a preliminary master plan for future water supply for Orange County.- In conjunction with this, the District has also undertaken a study of the feasibility of increasing the height of Santiago Dam to develop additional storage capacity. The need for this latter study has been advanced to the present time due to the recent storm damage experienced at Santiago Clam. The expense required to make repairs is extensive enough that consideration to the possibility of raising the dam should be undertaken now. Because these.studies and plans are of intermit to all concerned, the Orange County Municipal Water District would like to have interested agencies select a representative to serve with representatives of other interested agencies on a committee designed to provide a line of communication among agencies throughout Orange County. The Orange County Municipal Water District believes that through proper planning of water facilities to meet future demands, the residents within each part of Orange County may benefit from the economics that group participation can pprovide. It is intended that information on the progress of the District`s studies can ba communicaied to euch ogenizy through the proposed committee and that each agency will have the opportunity to express its views and thoughts. The first meeting of the committee is intended to be scheduled during the first part of July. Please inform the District in writing of yovr.selected representative by June 27 and provide 1"lis address and telephone nunber where he may normally be ontacted during working hours. David A. Boyle General Manuger & Secretary--Treasurer sh CITY OF GARDEN GROVE , CALIFORNIA 11391 ACACIA PARKWAY, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92640 6r ri �-- August 9, 1972 GARDEN GROVE To: Officers Orange County Division, League of California Cities Gentlemen: Attached is a model ordinance for the construction, abandonment, and destruction of water wells with a cover letter to the individual councils, a prepared fee schedule by the County, who was intended to administer this ordinance, and other information pertaining thereto. This issue was brought to your attention by Councilman Laurence Schmit from the City of Garden Grove at your last executive meeting on July 27, 1972. At this time, a question regarding oil wells was also raised ,from the floor. To respond to this, I have contacted the Division of Oil and Gas of the State's Department of Conservation and have secured a commitment from Mr. Bill Ingram, the Deputy Supervisor of this District, to answer and explain any questions you may have during your next meeting on September 14, 1972, when this issue is expected to be taken up again. Mr. Ingram's telephone number is (213) 678-7274, and he may be a valuable resource addition to your meeting. if I can be of any assistance in this matter, please do—not hesitate to contact me at this office'�638-6681. _. eer tr 1 � itrs, �- f '� b Richard 0. RafanOvic Director - Water Department ROR:j h Encl. : Ordinance (Model) Letter to Council Fee Schedule Dr. Philp's Ltr. ORANGE COUNTY WATER ASSOCIA,_ ION, INC. 1IT111",rYfir :""rk�Jc P.O. BOX 11311 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92711 August 9, 1972 �r IN IN"DUSTpY IN AGRICULTURE Honorable City Council: Attached is a model ordinance for the construction, abandonment and destruction of .water wells which was prepared by a special committee of the Orange County Water Association and submitted to you, other cities, and the Board of Supervisors. The purpose of the ordinance is to protect the County's water shed basins from contam- ination due to various and controlled activities related to water wells. To protect the basin, such an ordinance must be adopted by all of the jurisdictions within this County. While the implementation of this ordinance is a local effort, it or some similar measure would be imposed upon us by the regional arm of the State Quality Control Board under the provisions of the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The Act provides that the local quality control board shall set well standards in an area where the need is determined. A review of Orange County's water supply condition has been made by a special committee of the Water Association in cooperation with County staff and this committee's findings and recommendations are embodied in the attached. ordinance. During the last two years, this ordinance has also been reviewed by the State Department of. Water Resources, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the County Health Department, and the County Council's office. All have concurred and their recommendations are included in our proposal. ' During our investigation, we have also looked into the practice related to oil wells and find that these are regulated by the Division of Oil and Gas of the State's Department of Conservation. The proposed water well ordinance was drawn to designate the County Health Department as the agency which would administer the ordinance. . While each City could establish an i�idependent arm to administer such an ordinance, it is the Water Association's reconmiendation.that the County's Health Department be designated to perform this task. County staff have also prepared a fee schedule which will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for approval_ and will be operative in the unincorporated County territory. Should you decide to have the County administer your ordinance, each city would be required to adopt this ordi- nance and separately approve the County's fee schedule as well. Attached is a copy of this model ordinance in the form approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 13, 1972, the County's proposed fee schedule, and letter from Dr. Philp addressed to the Board of Supervisors, .which includes explanations regarding the staffing and the administration of this ordinance. Page 1 of 2 0 Honorable City Council The Board of Directors of the Orange County Water Association recommend your consideration of this ordinance and urge you to adopt such an ordinance within your municipality so as to protect this County's water supply and assure our constituents the quality of water we are all entirt to. Very t ul yours, h) Richard 0. RafanoV. President Orange County Water Association ROR:jh ® JOHN R. PHILP, M.D. * . HEALTH OFFICER ®! �L !�� C> SANTA ANA OFFICE V f W 645 NORTH ROSS STREET SANTA AN A, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE: 634-3131 Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 3SS F�A,N CI E Santa Ana, California 92702 ANAHEIM OFFICE 1011 SOUTH EAST STREET Qs ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 776-5551 HEALTH DEPARTMENT Mailing Address: P. 0. Box 355 Santa Ana, California 92702 r August •4, 1972 Richard Rafanovic President Orange County Water Association Garden Grove City Hall 11391 Acacia Street Garden Grove, California 92640 Subject: Well Ordinance Inspection Fee Schedule Dear Rick: is Enclosed, as per your request, is a tentative fee schedule for the recently adopted County Well Construction Ordinance. The fees shown are calculated to recover the entire cost of making the inspections required to enforce the ordinance. However, the schedule is not final and could be revised for reasonable cause prior to its adoption. For example, well abandonment is hard to detect and control, and the fee might be reduced somewhat so as to encourage applications for a permit. The schedule is not official, and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to becoming effective. We plan to submit it to the Board within the next two or three weeks. However, before doing so, we will discuss the fees with the well contractors in order to get their reaction. Also, I will appreciate receiving your comments and those of the other members of the well committee. Sorry I'm late in sending this to you. Very truly yours, Robert S. Stone, R.S. , Director Division of Environmental Health RSS:ee Enclosure cc: Orange County Water Association, Well Standards Committee a Draft 8/4/72 Proposed Inspection Fee Schedule Well Construction Ordinance New Well Construction $70.00 Reconstruction of Existing Well $42.00 Destruction of Abandoned Well $42.00 \ -Draft 8/4/72 Cost Analysis for Proposed Inspection Fee Schedule Well Construction Ordinance Type of Inspection Hours Hourly Cost Fee New Well Construction ' Review Plans, Process Permit 1 Field Inspections 4 Total 5 $14.00 $70.00 Reconstruction, existing well Review Plans, Process Permit 1 Field Inspections 2 Total 3 14.00 42.00 t Destruction, abandoned well I Review of logs, plans; process permit - l Inspect present condition of well 1 Inspect destruction operation 1 Total 3 14.00 42.00 j Draft 8/4/72 Cost Analysis, Continued Proposed Inspection Fee Schedule Well Construction Ordinance Item Annual Cost 1. Salaries a. Environmental Health Sanitarian (full time) $13,032. b. Environmental Health Engineering Specialist (18,636 x .25) 4,659, c. Director of Environmental Health (22,548 x .015) 338, d. Clerical (7,548 x .25) 1,887, 2. Supplies & Services (13,967 = 12 x 1.515) 1,762, 3. Retirement (7.18% x total salaries) 1,430. s 4. Health Insurance (157.20 x 1.515 positions) 239, 5. Building Rental, Maintenance, Utilities (439.30 x 1.515 positions) 729, 6. Departmental Overhead (5.63% x salaries & supplies) 1,222, i Total $25,298. i t t Cost of Inspections: 25,298 1788 hrs/yr/man = $14.15/hr JOHN R. PHILP, M.D. HEALTH OFFICER m p g� ,'� P ty�� SANTA ANA OFFICE i f�...� E�4d _ 645 NORTH ROSS STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE: 834.-3131 .p %•'�,_ M6If(ng Address: P. 0. eox 355 p-� s Santa Ana, CofNornfn 92702 ANAHE?M OFFICE 1011 SOUTH EAST STREET O ANAHEIM, CALIFORNI�(, TELEPHONE: 776--5551 HEALTH DEPARTMENT Making Address: P. 0. EIor 355 Santa Ana, California 92702 June 5, 197Z Honorable Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 515 North Sycamore Street Santa Ana,* California 92701 Subject: Proposed Ordinance to Regulate the Construction, Reconstruction, Destruction and Abandonment of Wells Within the Unincorporated Area of the County of Orange. Brief: Measures to control improper practices in the construction and abandonment of wells are necessary for the protection of ground water quality, For this reason, the Health. Officer recommends that the subject ordinance be adopted by your Honorable Board, Gentlemen: Attached hereto, for your consideration, is a proposed Well Construction i Ordinance. The purpose of this Ordinance is to protect the quality of the ground waters in Orange County by controlling improper practices utilize-i I _;« `z,ell con c i-r`.c tir\n :.".v.c nstruct1c. dest- c d 1 y {� l ' - � _ .. __, ., i, Lr L. L1Cil ui� ctu ants Cilll.tl Cll l.. vUl.l.i practices have been known to contribute to the degradation of our water supplies. The proposed ordinance is the product of an extensive review of this problem conducted by a special committee of. the Orange County Water Association. The committee consisted of rel)resentatives of the water purveyors, .the yell construction industry, consulting engineers, Orange County Water District, . Orange County Flood Control District and the Orange County Health Department, The committee's findings indicated a need for a uniform county-wide well ordinance, and they worked for over a year in its preparati.ori. The ordinance has been reviewed by the State Department of Water Resources and the staff of the Regional 1Vater Quality Control Board, Santa AnaRegion. n Honorable Board of Supervisors -2- June 5, 1972 Each agency's recommendations have been included, and each has concurred in the proposed draft. The County Counsel's Office also was consulted in t-he preparation of the ordinance. The State Legislature recognized the potential. seriousness of the well con- struction problem by enacting Sections 13800 to 13806 of the Water Code. These sections require the State Department of Water Resources to report and recommend to a Regional Water Quality Control Board, based on the Department's studies, -standards for well construction required to protect the ground water quality in a particular area. `The Regional Board after a hearing, can require the County and the Cities in th:e area to adopt local ordinances setting such standards. We have reason to believe that it is only a matter of time until such an action is taken. If the: local ordinances are not adopted within I20 days, the Regional Board rnav adopt such standards, which must then be enforced by the County and the Cities affected as though they were local ordinances. The Health Departrnent, therefore, recoTru-needs favorable action by your Honorable Board in aclopti.ng. the proposed ordin.ance.. .An effective county- wide i:mplernentation program would require enactment of a similar ordin- ance by the cities as well as the County. It is hoped that: your Board's af- fi.rrnative action will establish a precedent for such area-v'i.de approval. If the ordinance is adopted, the Health Department is prepared to proceed with its implementation. An 3 -.vironmental H`val`.:Ir Sanitaria.-i., with education in engineering ge; Logy, has been em-ploved under id,e F'ub1_i.c Employment Prograrn and has been undergoing field training and orientation for this purpose. RI✓COMMENDAT OIL T hat your Honor,:bl.e Board adopt the proposeO ordinance to regulate; t:he construction, recon- struction,, destruclidozl and aba.ndonm.ent of wells. 31'espectfully submitted, .t-O IN R. PI!lLI', TvI. 17, . Health Officer County of Orange ThP/mw 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 AN ORDIN12'iP;CE ADD!'-'G ARTICLE 2 TO DIVISION 5 , TITLE 4 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CO P_TY OF OBANG%, CAL IFOZN IA The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, . California, do 5 ordain as - follows : R. E 6 SECTI01-i 1. Article 2 is hereby added to Division 5 , Title 4 of the Codified Ordinances of the County of Orange to redd as follows : 7 8 ARTICLE 2 9 Construction and Abandonment of dells 10 Sec. 45 .021. . Purpose. 11 It is the purpose of this article to control the construction and reconstruction of .wells to the end that the ground grater of 121 this County will not be impaired in quality and that water obtained from such wells will be suitable for the purpose for . 13 which used and will not Jeopardize the health, safety or welfare of the nco-;1 e of this Cc-_nt.,; and to provide for the dcstruct:icn 14 of abandoned wells or wells found to be public nuisances to t:he c end that such wells will not impair the quality of ground water �z7 15 or otherwise jeopardize tiia health, safety or welfare of the oC) people of this. County. L�Ut 1G Uzx 1� Sec. 45 . 022 . Definitions . D7.< y U 17 1 As used in this article, the following words shall have the- 181 meaning provided in this section. ?9 ABA21DONED and ABANDON-, The tc�-.ls '`abandoned" or "abanc�ori- ent" shall apply to a well u;'hi ch his not been used for a period of one 2'J year , unless tale C;,"rner -de-clares in writin-D, to. the Well Stand,-_-rc:s `� ACI. i zary Board, 'his 7_nten-i oil' to tic:' ths, well again for sunnlyi-a 21 water of oth"r ass opte :'�d urDose �Smca as an ois- � Gr`Ta4.J_on wei1 II or injectlLZ). and -Eceives at-j^rova.l of such occlaratlon J_rcm 22 f the BoarcI . All _such de Ea-rations ,stall be rC'I1��IC"d .aunt:^1+v and at sucil ti:%e be rest bi,, tted to 'Cne .'Card for approval . T,,-r,t' 23 holes and -n:.piozatory holes shall Ibe considered abandoned twcnty- f our hours c ri 'r cons tr-,,c ion tins been completed, unless 24. otherv:ise approved by the health Of icer. 251 AC'R?r A water �7ell „sed to water for 4 -, ' tion or o'L-her agricultural pur o.ses , including so-called stock, ; 26�1 wells. ter/1� CA TI:1001C. 1� *�IEC Iry.T 1�5`I'.LL. Any i f' l excavation e i f'f Ca! ( ��`s.,.. C � y ari.- =c 3Y i.r. excess � Ii 50 feet cL7T�i;1t..i•�c ti': 17 j' an� :��:iVC: `^" t "•'-' purr,`.�se of installing� C it!i� rinf! or for thic, pro`LctY.on, elect_-ri.caily, of IC1Ct"s.11.iL' CCs,-'«c^.C-_ r'inUildy C.C;e1:It€711ly rE.fG._ :.f:_d �•✓ � to •-7.✓ c.. CaLt'i•.;�nic Y'.rC?{: C 7_Cii?. '.Jt. 1.. .- f.. CLC:p ancoe. f�V*.c,4UI,11ITY r°" ` "n S-13 ?L TTC i� ' ell us-ed to Supplyw. for1,_ /�< [ F < r K.� 1,Y'�] L �}: :-,'la. . is C' ' /�7 r }-/� (� 1 t (�} T 1x -C.•t` 1_ol," �'lr f'�ry`I .�.t.- pt�.-�,i pV 1es i !4 J Yl !�..*a l� Kljt'� `.'.•..L t\♦ 1, {-l:.'oL.1..l.. / o1 L,a A�t 1. zi of 'Division 5 o* Che Cali orI-La i •.< fi_C1 ar,,.. sa-et:y Cod{ 32 T 13 11 s ' t 1 CONSTRUCT, RECO�dSTRUCT (CO:1STRliCTIO?I, RECONSTRUCTION) . TO dig, drive, bore , drill or dceoen a �.,ei1 , or to reperforate, remove, 2 replace:; br extend a well casing. ,- 3 DESTRUCTION. The proper filling and sealing of a well that is no longer- useful so as to assure that the ground water is 4 protected and to eliminate a potential- physical hazard. 5 - ELECTRICAL G 01,PNDI21G WELL. Any artificial excavation in excess of 50 feet constructed by any, met Od, .far- the purpose -of est'ab7 s'h g ing an electrical ground. 7 HEALTH OFFICER. 'The Orange County Health` Officer or his designee. 8 INDIVIDUAL DOMESTIC WELL. A water well used to supply water for domestic needs of an individual residence or commercial establish- 9 ment. 10 INDUSTRIAL WELL. A water well used to supply an industry on an individual basis . 1I OBSERVATIONIgF.LL. A well used for monitoring or sampling the 12 conditions of a water-bearing aquifer, such as water pressure, depth, movement or quality. 13 - PERMIT. A written permit issued by the Health Officer permitting 14 the construction, reconstruction, destruction, or abandonment of a well .' Z 15 ,I6 PERSON. Any person, firm, corporation or governmental agency. 161 rt � PUBLIC 'dUISANCE. Tile term "public nuisance", when applied to ;0 17 a well , shall mean any well which threatens to impair the quality of gro.ind Water or otherwise jeopardize the health or safety of 18 the public . 19 SALT WATER (IIYDR-ULIC) BARRIER WELL. A well used for extracting water from` or in4rcting-water into the underground as 'a means of 20 preventing;,tile_ intrusion of salt water into a fresh water. bearing aquifer. 21 TEST OR EXPLORATORY HOLE. An excavation used for determining th_- 221 nature of unu`r.,rcund geological or hydrological conditions , whether by seismic investigation, direct observation or any otr'ti4r 23 means . 2f- WELL. Any .artifici.al excavation constructed by any method for the purpose of ext-racting water from or infecting water into the 25 underground , for providing cathodic protection or electrical grounding of equipment . -for aialcing tests or observations of 26 underground con-.iit.ions , or for any other similar .purpose . Wells s1la1-1 include, b-ut sij anll not be limited to, cc.mm,Unity water 27 supply �� ells , i ndi.vidual domestic wells , industrial wells , agricultural_ wells , cathodic protection wells , electrical 281 grounding wells , test and exo1oratory holes , observation wells and salt water (hydraulic) barrier Y.el.ls , as defined herein, 20 and other ,yells whose ;-egul.atiori is necessary to fulfill the purpose of this article as determined by the lVell Standards 30 Advisory Hoard. Wells shall not include: (a) oil and gas wells , 31 32 2 . A &e.o:thermal wells 'or other wells.=c.onstructed. under the J.ur.is..I,.7,:e . diction of the State .Denartment of Conservation, except those 2 wells converted to use as water wells , (b) wells used for; the _._. .purpose- of -dewatering excavations during construction,- or. 3 stabilizing hillsides or earth embankments ; or (c) other wells whose regulation is not necessary to fulfill the purpose of 4 this article as. determined by the Well Standards Advisory Board. 6 Sec. 45 ,023. Well'-Standards Advisory Board. 6 A board consisting of five members shall be appointed by 7 the Board. of Supervisors . One of the members appointed shail be a person employed in a supervisory cap acity by a water purveyor 0 in the County of Orange whose system relies to a significant extent upon ground water; one shall be a registeredcivil engineer 9 under the laws of the State of California who is experienced in sanitary engineering and who. is qualified in the field of water .10 supply; one shall be a person licensed in accordance with the provisions of the Contractors License Law, Chapter 9, Division 3 11 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California; one shall be a person who is qualified in the field of water ~ 3.2 quality; and one shall be a registered geologist under the laws of the State of California who is aualiiied in the field of 13 ground water hydrology. One of the aforementioned persons shall be a representative of the Orange County Water District and one 14 shall represent the Orange County Wijter Pollution Department , z 15 i 'Members shall_ serve for a three year term and until the qualification of a successor , except that the first mei-,ibers shall (3 sorve sta,—cred terms , as determined by the drawing of lots , in folio.;in manner : One member shall serve for a one vear 17 tom of office; two Yr.-embers shall serve for a two year term of office; 6.7o member_ shall serve for a three year term of office. 18 All- to vis hall end on the first „onday in January of the_ year in which such ter., is to expire. 19 Travcli.ng and other expenses incurred by each Board member M it, tfic Performance of his official duties shall be reimbursed 1 ` at a rate of $10. 00 per meeting. Sec. 45 , 024. Acts prohibited , permit required. No POr: oa shall, N"ithin the unincorporated area of the f2 Oovinty of Orange construct or reconstruct any well unless such construction or ro cons truction is carried out pursuant to and 4 1 in conforairuice with a written permit issued for that purpose by t1he Hcal`h Officer as provided in this article. Nor :,hall any such person abandon a well unless it has been wti 3!Stroycd pursu.,nt to and in conformance with a written permit irs,sued by the iicalth Officer: 27 Nor shall any such person violate the terms of any order 28 issued by the Well Standards Advisory Board or the Health Officer, issued pursuant to this .article. �9 Sec . 45 . 025 . Permits . Applications for permits shall be made to the Ilea'!• :h Officf.', 1 . eonta i1XI-0 ing such i format ion a s '.-.e shall r-eq,.: r.e. . 3 . 1 Each application shall. be accompanied by _ a fee which shall. be established by the Board of Suae•rvisors on the basis of .the 2 cost 'incurred in, enforcing the provisions of this article.- - Fifty percent (SO'�l o) of t►e tee shall be returped to the apprlicarit 3 should the-.- permit be denied or if the permit is cancelled within f sixty (60) days after issuance and .no work has -been done. A 4 permit shall remain in effect for one year from date of issuance. 5 Permits may .be issued subject to any condition or require- ment found by the Health 'Cfficer to be necessary to accomplish 6 the purposes of this article. . s 7 A permit Tray be cancelled or the conditions amended by the Health Officer if he determines that to.'proceed with the S work would result in a public nuisance or the permit holder has violated the terms of the permit or this . article. 9 Sec. 45.026. Completion of Work. 10 The permittee shall notify the Health Officer in writing 11 upon completion of the work and no work shall be deemed to have been completed until such written notification has been received. 12 A final inspection of the work shall be made by the Health Officer and no nermittee shall be deemed to have. complied with 13 this article or his permit until such inspection has' been performed. Sec. 45 . 027. Notice; Cancellation or Denial of Permit. a� 15 ;o In the event a permit i3 d ' , applicant "denied or cancelled, the o_�c«nt ,t 16 ! or permit holder shall be -iven written notice by the Health =< Officer, which notice sha i saecify the reasons for his action ;0 1�T and shall novi=y the or permit holder or his right to request a hearing before the Well Standards Advisory Board 18 within ten days. 1.3 , Sec. 45 .023. notice: Public Nuisance. 20 In the event the Health Officer determines that a well constitutes a public nuisance, he shall mail a writr'4n notice ?1 to the lando,,ner and t�:e Dermi t hoicer, if other than the land- owner. A .^o-,)v of `he not ce Shall 'be t)oSt'd on the a%fCcted 22 pr0PCrt 71 :e nctiCC? S-n-ali_ state ti,e speciri c z aciS giv ind rise, t0 Si?Cj2 nuiScnCC'; 4I1:'_ corrective measures . de`:lmed necessary; 23 and ti^`, d1ate, and place at whic : a heari"" shall be held by the l' ell Staniarc's Aovisory Lioa `d rc i "ing ttnerei�OS v,h`1.ch date 24 I shall be not .ess ui'= ten nor more thnn thirty C3ys after the f date such notice is mailed. The notice shall state that, in 25 the event ti �oard det?r:^ines that a public nu-isance exists a special assess-ment shall be imposed upon the land for any 26 costs of abatement. 27 Sec. 45 .029. Immediate Abatement. wS If the health Oficcr ir, nediate action is finds that Necessary to prevent impairment of the ground water or a threat 29 to the health or safety of the public , he may abate the nuisance without- giving notice. Within twenty-four (24) hours. after 30 inita.atir Suci: abauenient , the Health Officer shall give notice of a hearin before the Well Standards Advisory Board in the 31 manner prescribed in Section 45 . 028. 32 4. f 1 Sec. 45 . 0210. Board Rearing. 2 _ .. _ A.t__they time fixed for the hearing, the 1.7ell Standards, i. Advisory Loard shall hear -,nd ccnsider all relevant testimony 3 and evidence offered by the lardo.oner, and by any other interested- person. In the event the Board finds that a public 4 nuisance exists , it shall direct the Health Officer to take any necessary action to protect the ground water or the health { 5 and safety of the public , unless the situation is corrected by i •d-j:{te --t'o- be specified -by the- -Board. - g M The costs of such corrective work by the Health Officer shall � L� .:. ,f: becom;e'•a .sp.ecial :'assessment upon-- 1arid, pursuant to Section 'and- ,:: 7 : 45.0211. 8 If the Board finds that a permit was improperly denied or cancelled , it shall order the Health Officer to issue or 9 reinstate such permit. 10 Sec. 45 . 0211. Abatement Costs a Special. Assessment. 11 Upon a finding by the Well Standards Advisory Board that a well constituts a public nuisance, all cost of abatement . . 12 carried out under the terms of this section shall constitute ? - a char-ce and special assessment upon the parcel of land involved. 13 If such costs are not paid within sixty (60) days , they shall them be declared a special assessment against that parcel as provided f 1.4 in CovernWent Gode Section 25545 . Such special assessment snail be collected at the s_mm�o time and in the same' manner as ordinary 15 Count.; taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedures and sale in case of. delinquency iLl 161 as provided fcr ordinary County taxes . The County shall retain the additional and indei)endent right to recover its costs by 17 way of civil action against the o,aner and person in possession or control , jointly or severally. Sec. 45 .0212. Standards. 19 � Standards for the construction, . reconst.ruction, destruction, 20 or .ab and or,~ient of .sells shall be the standards recommiended -in the Stste D`Dartment of ?•i`ter Resources Bulletin No. 74, Chapter 21 11 and Appendices E, F and G, and future amendments thereto. Until sucii. time as standards for cathodic protection wells and 22 electrical -roundiin:; weds are recommended by the Department of Water Resources , such wells small con?=orm to the "Tentative 23 I?E'E ) r�Z]OC St3iid rt1S , Sii�?�-.ts A-497-S--1 and A-497-S-2 , reviser December 10, 1969 , of ti;-_ Southern Ca].i.fornia Cathodic Protection 24. Cc: ait:tee. Well stardar6s may be modified by the Health Officer , with the advice and concurr:'nce of the Well Standards Advisory i --25 Board, where required to cope with local geological. and ground � water conditiolls . g 1 Sec. 45 .0213. Penalty. Any person who violates l he ten-is of this article or any 28 permit issued hereunder shall be guilty of a misdemennor, punishable by a: fine not: exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500) 29 or by imprisonment not_ exceeding six (n) months , _or by both such fine and imprisonment . Such person shall be deemed guilty 30 of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during; which any such violation is con-bitted, continued or 31 permitted and shall be subject to the same punishment as for the original offense, 32 e _ 5 i SI . i - - ... I SECTION 2 This Ordinance shall ta�:e effect anti be in ,2; '-full . force thirty (30) days from and --after its passage, and before the 3 .A expiration of fifteen (15) days after the passage thereof shall be published once in the , a newspaper published 5 in the County _af,.Orange, State of California., ,together with the names o 6 the members of :Ghe;_Baa-rd of Supervisors _,voting .,for and against the same. s (SEAL) Mairman or the hoard carSupervisor's 9 of Orange County, California. ATTEST 10. 1 W. E. ST` JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 11 of the Board of Supervisors of 12 ; Orange County, California 13 gy J 14 15 °� S TPAI TE •OF a:iL I FORK ) Qz 1 } �,01.7 COUNTY OF ORAMCE } 18 I, W. E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk- of the }hoard of Supervisors, do hereby certify that at a regular r:ueeting oz I9 the Board of Super*Jsors of Orange County, California, held on the 20 daN, of 19 72 , the fci u ait�g Ordinance 4 containing; r > > uections , teas considered section by section snd that the saic. urdinnance was. then passed and adopted as a whole by 21 the following vote: 22 , AYES :: SUPE V IS GR S 231 241 z k"DES : SL�1'Er1%7 IS 03 S . �. A; SENT: SUPEb\T1SORS I. y i ` off- III WITI 7uSS }r E u.OF, I have hareunto Bert my harynd Andes affi_%cd I, t1-e c- mil sc. l o tsai.a. -"E'c and of SU.b;arviJlJJ..s o th�a Coun Ly of Orla 1fU4.°J 2� j State of California, this duy of , 19 72 . 281 W. E. T JOIHN H- CountyCountyC1erlcundex-of£icio Clerk Qf 'the Bcard ' of Supervi3ors , of 30 Orange County, California 311 y l , eputy .32 6, OFFICERS0. .C! DIRECTORS CLEM M. MccbLLOCH - MUNICIPAL PRESIDENT GLENN P. ALLEN WATER - - GERALD E. PRICE W. B. HELLIS DISTRICT VICE PRESIDENT DENNIS -E. MACLAIN DAVID K. JONES OF GENERAL MANAGER - ORANGE . SECRETARY-TREASURER CLEM M. MCCOLLOCH - WINTHROP O. GORDON- COUNTY ATTORNEY GERALD E. PRICE P.O. BOX 315 17332 IRVINE BOULEVARD, SUITE "G" TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92680 (714) 544-3515 IN - August 25, 1972. Mr. 'Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,; CA 92648 Dear Mr. Jones: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated August 22, 1972, transmitting Resolution No. 3554 requesting delivery of State water. Resolution No. 3554 .states that the City of Huntington Beach would like a 30% blend of State Project water in the. Second Lower Feeder by. January 1976. This.request is not possible until the Yorba Linda C Pipeline to the Diemer Plant is completed in January 1976. However, 100% State Project water could be made available in the Second Lower Feeder during the interim period'between "January 1973 and January 1976. i 1f further explanation is desired, please don't hesitate to call me. Cordially, Dennis E. MacLain "SZ5 General 'Manager SES/lm xc: Eric Lovejoy MUNICIPAL 'WATER DISTRICT OF � ORANGE COUNTY Y 1733<'Irvine Boulevard,Tust=lr, Contact:Dennis E. MacLain (714) 8/23/73 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The recently announced cut in the Metropolitan Water District's tax rate from $0. 15 to $0. 14 per $100 of assessed valuation was criticized Wednesday by Dennis MacLain, General Manager of the Municipal Water District of Orange County. MacLain told Municipal's Board of Directors that the tax cut is "deceptive. " "If this trend continues and the tax rate continues to drop, then I'm afraid we'll see an increase in water rates by MWD to offset losses Cin tax money," MacLain said. "We could actually end up paying more for our water. " MacLain said he would like to see the tax rate remain "as high as is reasonable. " He termed the cut a "power play" on the part of the city of Los Angeles which has an assessed valuation of 25 percent of MWD valuation but uses only 8 percent of its allotted MWD water. "Naturally a tax cut is going to benefit Los .Angeles, but it's liable to result in higher water rates for the other 26 MWD agencies, including Municipal, " MacLain told the Board. .Los Angeles sets most of its water from its own Owens River AgiiedLICt System, using most of its MWD water for standby and emergency SAILI!tio11s. continued. . . . . . . . . . O Tax Cut August 23, 1973 Page Two "Los Angeles can do whatever it wants to with its MW.b water, " .vlacL ain said, "but it should be required to pay for the facilities necessary to provide that service.." He said taxation is the most equitable method of paying for those facilities. MacLain said he is not against lowering the tax rate if other equitable sources for raising money can be found, such as imposing a standby charge for agencies such as Los Angeles which use only a small part of the water allotted them. S/23/73 FEDERAL GRANT ASSISTANCE EO�:��%'�' c�� n �7 fr Y; AS PROVIDED UNDER THE HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1965 ,rr , "'' t'1i �.<;�{�;�i rl.�^t'i''�i�K�.yn;• rr:1,.:, .r - ;,'�3' F gar _h.. ,p'i•- _;rr. ., ,f.,' .. ,e, I i,` c � py'ro • _ :r ' •r� y„„�f.K'''j1' t`��:i,�•ir-,)."'t' ^n.A-.hs �t f ' F �ar: rvJ�,' .:SjJii"�,r - .zK-' Y .3�,��,. '•L:7 •:;1'c � • ;�{e1�?„ ��•t`'d.'s�`,A °�i... ^",��%�h��•r:'fk r�fi�M(:f£-r�'-`� °,`r i r i 'fa. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20410 � JANUARY 1966 ���.{.' w.;j,,:f�y.{t. C,it .�h � •`, ` - _ — — - _ ___ _ _ _ - __ _ `{,rv•.rs�'`F,}��u�y,^r. —�-..�.�r ..�_ _ .`=,�:ry;�.�,s',...=�=.:.r,-=+Y::-v.�:,--t-:r•::--_ _ __,'.���` r T$e most pressing'problem facing many rAmeri- can communities is the lack of adequate water and sewer systems. Many small towns have no public water systems , or sewer lines. Cities and counties with rapid growth problems need to expand existing sys- r tems to meet present and future needs. Many of these communities simply cannot by' j S �. themselves finance new or improved water and 'a 1 Ter sY stems. Without Federal aid, they must .3 -. setae for less, than they need. All too often, much of the water and sewer work done has been on a piecemeal basis. The result has ' often been unrelated and inadequate systems N ' that can't be joined into an• A, _ _ `a:�•u-+ efficient, coordi- :{ 1 noted areawide system. One major reason for rising local taxes in so many places across the country is that we must undo or redo much that was done only a few years ago. This has happened in so many - communities that it adds up to a national prob- lem. And our Federal Government has re- _ ! sponded to it. t, The Congress, in its 1965 session, has provided new programs of Federal grants for basic water and sewer systems. These can help small /�►ns with no systems or large urban areas �___,h outworn systems. And the y grants will assure that these new or improved systems will, ;. not soon become outdated. "The first stepis to break old patterns . . to The grant program of the Department of Hous- j P ing and Urban Development is designed designed to begin to think, work and plan for the develop- assist communities to finance water and sewer ;t ment `of entire metropolitan areas . . . New lines that are, or can be, made part of an efficient, areawide system. Water and sewer r• and existingprograms will be open to those P P projects financed with this Federal aid must be „• cities .which,work together to develop unified, planned to fit in with a local program for com- �i k long-range policies for metropolitan areas. prehensive development of the community, f J This pamphlet does not give you complete de- tails on how to obtain a rant. Its purpose is k ` President Lyndon B. Johnson g P Po ! ' State of the Union Message , �,' to help you decide whether your county or city ( or town should apply. Here are some ques- 1 January 4, 1965 lions and answers on what you need to know. ' { '��' � ... .,ter -� �,�i •. � � � f,, '�.. ;t':{/-,. ' 'ray' •:' 4t/i..,'�� . :'a - _-' --_ � i HOW MUCH OF' THE PROJECT COST WILL THE 'GRANT COVER? F Direct grants will cover up to 50 percent of the Y j cost of building the facility and for the land, easements and rights-of-way required for the 5 WHO MAY RECEIVE A GRANT? system. This includes costs to improve the site to permit its use, but building costs incurred or Any local public body with a legal right to ' assumed before signing a Grant Agreement J Plan, finance, construct and operate the pro- are ineligible for assistance. Grant money } posed project may apply for grant assistance. may be used to cover the entire cost of reloca- Applicants can include cities, towns, villages, tion payments to eligible persons forced to move townships, counties, Indian tribes, sewer and from land acquired for the site. water districts, or combinations of such units. WHAT MUST THE APPLICANT . � WHAT CAN THE "BASIC WATER �r AGREE .TO PAY? ' AND SEWER, GRANT COVER? ! �• Before a grant is avvroved, the applicant must f Grants may be obtained to help finance sped. r;, s o_w it w _be able to provi e e other funds / ;. w ired to fmgng ro•ect. a an cific projects. Water systems include worla _ •� �- �. store, supply, treat, purify, or transmit enough w..�-Probably enable most applicants to obtain water of good quality needed for housing, the balance of funds needed for the project. i business, and industrial use. Sewer facilities Others that cannot secure funds needed at ;t include sanitary sewer systems that collect, reasonable terms may file with this Department „! transmit and discharge liquid wastes; and for a loan. Such loans may be made if the storm se er s stems that collect transmit ancT applicant meets population limits and other I ' scharc�e water cause y ra --fallor groun requirements of the Department's Public Facility water ru Loans program. WHAT ELSE WILL BE REQUIRED? WHAT CANNOT BE COVERED BY THESE GRANTS? A grant will be made if the proposed project will improve the health or living standards of �! te ro the Also project le to be served people C' p . , They will not help pay for water or sewer lines the p . connecting to houses or other buildings, or the must be: local collection or distribution laterals. Sew 1. Designed so that capacity will be ample to age treatment works cannot be assisted and serve the foreseeable growth needs of the this program; such plants are covered unc other Federal programs. Nor may a basic 2—Consistent with a program for a unified or." water or sewer grant be used to maintain or , , officially coordinated areawide water or make ordinary repairs on existing facilities. .� , sewer system as part of a comprehensively planned development of the area. �. ��•,f: 3. Necessary to orderly community develop- i ment. Prior to July 1, 1968, a grant may be made' ' for a water or sewer project if (a) the pro- I gram for a unified.or officially coordinated o areawide water or sewer system is under active preparation although not yet com- a...,. :.. !,.,# •`i. �'•��' ''�' pleted, (b) the facility for which assistance is sought can reasonably be expected to be required as part of the areawide system, and "(c) there is an urgent need for the facility. ,_y 2 3 j . No sewer grant can be made unless the Secre- tary of the Department of Health, Education,, and Welfare certifies that any waste carried by the sewers will be adequately treated before REGIONAL OFFICES OF discharge into any public waterway so as to 1 THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND meet Federal, State, interstate, or local water ' URBAN DEVELOPMENT quality standards. t� REGION I: 346 Broadway,New York,N.Y., 10013 IS OUTSIDE HELP NEEDED f N w York,Rhode sla Massachusetts,, Vt New Hampshire, TO OBTAIN A GRANT? REGION II: 1004 Widener Building,Chestnut and Juniper I No, and no part of the proceeds of any grant Streets,Philadelphia,Pa., 19107 under this program may be used to pay anyone: ' (Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New who helps prepare, submit or process an Jersey,Pennsylvania,Virginia,West Virginia) C r application. r�`ION III: 645 Peachtree-Seventh Building, Atlanta, i \.d., 30323 { DO THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina,Tennessee) AND EXECUTIVE ORDER ON REGION IV: Room 1500, 360 North Michigan Avenue, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY APPLY? �` Chicago, Ill., 60601 (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Ne. Yes. Those who take part in the program must', braska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wis- comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of consin) ' 1964 and the rules and regulations issued under it by the Department of Housing and 14,{ REGION V: Federal Center,300 West Vickery Boulevard, Urban Development (24 CFR, Subtitle A, ;i Fort Worth, Tex., 76104 Part I). And.under Executive Order No. 11246 . s{ (Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma,Texas) on Equal Opportunity, participants must agree f there will be no discrimination in employment ; REGION VI: 450 Golden Gate Avenue, P.O. Box 36003, on account of race, creed, color, or national f San Francisco, Calif., 94102 Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, South. origin when the project is b eing built. ern Idaho, Utah, Wyoming) WHAT SHOULD THE APPLICANT ffjj �1(rea 00ce: 909 First Avenue, Seattle, Wash., 98104 �`�[Alaska, Montana, Northern Idaho, Oregon, Wash-( mgton) DO FIRST? REGION VII: 1608 Ponce de Leon Avenue,P.O.Boa 9093, Make sure you know which Federal program fits your local needs best. A number of Federal 4th Floor, Garraton Building, Santurce, Puerto Rico, 00908 F agencies provide aid for building-or improving (Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands) water and sewer systems. One way to find ' out which program suits your needs is to write { to the Regional Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. (The11 ad- { dress of the office serving your State will be �; U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFI(E:1966-0 7H6 880 found on the facing page). Ask for instruc- j{ „ / tions for filling out a Preliminary Inquiry Concerning Federal Assistance for water and sewer facilities. This step will make it clear which program applies and what steps you { should take next. I rEUERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION R E C E I V E D W MAR 3 1966 REFERRED TO. ...:.�.:.:.-.-. . W uj LLI i W s i W • •. i � _ JNrfZ 1 y ' rtv C, t a �..._. 4t � '>;A - ���.r'.J_^in,'4cr.'o-^zd:...<�Lu::s.s.,.....u.'n:.�.r4.a'�:,a:.,sa.�i': .i+�:.w..::,bw.s:..4.-s`..�,�•o e4.. I - lie. Nn- O� r IORANGE �. C UN7V � 17332 Irvine Boulevard,Tustin,California 92680 Contact:Dennis El.MacLain(714)544-3515 8-23-73 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE The Municipal Water District of Orange County is entitled to another director on the Metropolitan Water District Board, it was revealed Wednesday. Dennis MacLain, Municipal's General Manager, told the Municipal Board of Directors that an increase in Municipal's assessed valuation entitled it to a fifth director on MWD's member board. Municipal's assessed valuation now constitutes. 12, 05 percent of MWD's total assessed valuation of approximately $29 billion. MacLain said the addition of another director will give Municipal a greater voice in the formation,of future MWD policies. "Much of MWD's policy is decided in committees and that's where we ;.hope an extra director will give us a still greater say in the formulation of future MWD policies, " MacLain said. The new director will be named in the near future, according t to MacLain. An MWD director serves no specific term, but his performance is reviewed by the Municipal Board of Directors periodically, he said. 8/23/73 rJJ D ll OFFICERS DIRECTORS cL�A Pr!. MccOLLOCH ! MUNICIPAL GLENN P. ALLEN R-slo_NT �"� WATER e GERALD E. PRICE ROBERT R. DOWLING PRESIU5NT DISTRICT D ,I .I.�aE MANAGER. AcAIN DAVID K. JONES yr OF ORANGE SECRZTAr(-TREASURER - CLEM M. McCOLLOCH - r`✓INTFf 20P O. GORDON COUNTY ATTORNsr GERALD E. PRICE - P.O. Enox 315 17332 IRVINE BOULEVARD, SUITE ''G'' TUSTIN. CALIFORNIA 92680 (714) 544-3515 December 28, 19 7 3 " E 1� O• t�LL CO 'i. re1-'�G itVLr tsvY�lVi,tr..7 OF i HE l�l v1Cir►is WATEP., DIST RICT OF ORANGE COU14TY - As you are aware; a great deal of energy is required to serve Grange Coiinty with water. Tlie Colorado River Aqueduct uses about 79 5000, 000 1,11owatt- hours, of electricity each clay when running at full capacity. In addition., an average of 350 kilowatt-hours is required to purrip anacre-foot of water from our underground. supply. Because of current energy short<^ges, the Metropolitan Water l7istr.i�a f . Southern California has shut dog=rn 215 percent of its pumping operations from tLe Colorado River. This means a power savinc s, and a: reduction in th(--i arnou:nt of imported water available for Southern California. Obviously, Orange.County must do sornethin.g to cope with this situation: Tb"e Municipal Water District of. Orange 'County,. which distributes i.rrlported water throughout the county, thus urges your agency to undertake eater conservation measures. You co-,Ad start by urging local scuools and other agencies to avoid unnecessary ;rater use, such as excessive irrigation of lawns, parks, and green areas. A program to repair:all water leaks, no matter how . small, would also gave water. Furthur, youx help in advising all local ovate?- users of the impa -tance of v,a"ter censer-ration woule, be most helpful. This would entail contacting the general public as well as industrial, commercial and other large organizations. i Water Conservation Page 2 b You may find it helpful to point out that the average homeowner uses water in these proportions Lawns and. Other Outside Uses . . . . . 50% Toilets . . . . . . . 22% Baths ., . . . . . . 15%. Laundry. and Dishes . . . .. . .1070 Drinking and Cooking . . . . . . 3% It is also interesting to note that while the amount of water needed to sustain the desired environment in Orange County is estimated to be 100 gallons per day per person, current water use is about 14.0 gallons a day. There is certainly room for water conservation practices. Enclosed is a suggested program for water conservation. Hopefully, your. agency will be able to pass this information, to water users, by way of water bill enclosures, newsletter articles, or other methods. Please feel free to contact Bill' Meadows at the Municipal Water District of Orange County for additional information. Cordially, 7DI-1. General Manager .1�_; Sg__S WM/dn i i MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY I HOW TO GROW A GREENER, HEALTHIER LAWN A large number of people irrigate lawns in ways which not only waste water, but which promote lawn diseases and increase the need for fertilizers. . To , fight diseases, the person must often resort to the use of undesirable pesti- cides, herbicides and fungicides, many of which may find their way into the local water supply. The key.to successful lawn irrigation is to.water slowly,, deeply, and. infrequently. .In areas "blessed" with hard soils, deep penetration. is best accomplished by extremely slow intermittent application; such. as by sprinkling for 15 minutes,. ` . allowing the water to soak in., and then re-sprinkling for I5'minute.s. _...:..._�.The..fol.l.o�vi.ng�.tip.s..:ruin..Ia.elta..your.iac�rn,:be :healthier: and�yaur:w'ate.�,Yiil�_Iower« .___. .�.Y_ 1. Water during the mid-day hoilrs to prevent.the spread of fungus diseases.. This gives the lawn a chance to dry '. before night. Mid-day watering also helps your water supplier by avoiding the morning and evening hours vrhen peak.demands are. placed.upon the water system. 2. Water only when grass shows signs of wilting. Eliminate the "every other day" approach. Overwatering is wasteful, costly to the consumer, and harmful to plant life. 3. When irrigating, apply the water as slowly as possible to achieve deep penetration and.avoid wasteful runoff. 4. Do not flood your lawn to the point where runoff to the gutter occurs. Besides. wasting water, this washes nutrients from the soil, 5.. During the s��rrlrraer, do not cut your. grass too short. Rather, let it grow to a length of about one and one-half inches. The higher grass. shades the roots and helps. eliminate water loss. As a. bonus, mowing frequency is also reduced. For a smooth,; trim lawn, make sure the mower blades are kept sharp. . Remove cut grass to prevent dry appearance and to discourage disease" MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY OTHER WAYS TO CONSERVE WATER (and lower your water bill) . 1. Periodically check your system for water leaks., and repair them promptly. A pinhole leak. can lose 170 gallons a day (costing you about $1. 70 per,month). A fast drip can waste 970 gallons daily (nearly $10. 00 a month). 2. Check the toilet tank to be sure there is not a continuous flow from the tank to the bowl. Normally,. you can hear such a leak. A toilet leak can use up to 3, OOO gallons a day; costing.the homeowner $30. 00 a month. 3. ' Check the rubber ,stopper in the-bottorn of your toilet tank to be. sure it.is seating pri�pexl and-*siiot°deteti"ora.ted td''tae poirst,of bei' ineffective - Replace if necessary. . 4. Since toilets normally use an unnecessary five to seven gallons. with each flushing, reduce the volume of the tank.by carefully inserting a brick- or water filled plastic bottles Toilets should only require about three'gallo3xs to function properly. . After placing brick or plastic bottle, test to make sulxa toilet.works well, 5. Use the stopper at the bottom of your wash basin-and kitchen, sink when. washing`ins ead of letting the water run, 6. Adjust shower heads to fine spray settings, and take shorter showers. 7. Turn off the faucet while brushing your teeth® 8. Be water-thrifty when washing cars. MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY DIRECTORS MILO DELLMANN, President � / MARSHALL R. BOWEN CENTRAL BASIL�T ROBERT J. FURLONG CLLAIRE S. THOM SON, JR. MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FRANK H. WHEELOCK ------_ 7439 EAST FLORENCE AVENUE DOWNEY, CALIFORNIA 90240 869-1163 773-5790 April 149 1966 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Huntington Beach City Hall, Civic Center Huntington Beach, Calif. Attn: City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is certified copy of Resolution No. 4-66-197 adopted by the Board of Directors of Central Basin 1unicipal 1-later District at its regular meeting of April 69 1966, endorsing the proposed " 850 9 000 9 000 tiJater Bond Issue of The Metropolitan dater District of Southern California. Very truly yours , Z:e--L- Marvel Roberts Deputy Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 4-66-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL ?JATER DISTRICT ENDORSING THE PROPOSED 1$,85o,000,000 ti�IATER BOND ISSUE OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan [dater District of Southern California has determined to submit to the voters within said District, at the June 7, 1966, election, a proposition for the issuance of $850,000,000 of general obligation bonds for the construction of facilities to dis- tribute water from the State 1-later Project; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan dater District has for many ,years, been well known for its expert planning in the distribution of supplemental water throughout Southern California; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has complete confidence in the judgment of the Board of Directors of said Metropolitan Water District to adequately plan for the necessary physical facilities to distribute supplemental water throughout Southern California before the need therefor becomes critical; and WHEREAS, said proposed [:later Bond Issue is the most practical and feasible means of financing the said necessary distribution facilities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL IJATER DISTRICT as follows,. That this Board of Directors endorse, and it does, hereby, endorse Proposition W, the $850,000,000 Ilater Bond Issue of The Metropolitan [Water District of Southern California for the construction of facilities necessary to deliver throughout Southern California the water contracted for by said Metropoli- tan 11ater District with the State of California; That confidence is hereby expressed in the judgment of the Board of Directors of said Mietropolitan Water District, in choosing the said Tlater Bond Issue as the most practical and economical method of financing the necessary water distribution facilities; That approval of the timeliness of the said IJater Bond Issue to avoid subsequent critical need for the said water distribution facilities is hereby expressed, and That the Secretary of this District is instructed to certify to the adoption of this resolution and transmit a certified copy thereof to the Board of Directors of The 14etro- politan Ilater District of Southern California, to each city included within the corporate boundaries of the said •ietropoli- tan Hater District and to the six Boards of Supervisors of the counties comprising the said Metropolitan �Jater District. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of April, 1966. _/s/1iilo Dellmann President ATTEST- Is/ Carl Fossette Secretary I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Central Basin 11unicipal Water District at a meeting thereof held April 6, 1966. DATED: This 14th day of April, 1966. gz"� Marvel Roberts Deputy Secretary (SEAL) i -2- .. fi 1 hhh MOUNT SAN ANTONIO' COLLEGE -= ANNOUNCEMENT ] . iz COURSES OFFERED FOR WATER INDUSTRY - FALL,.1971 DIAGRAAlMATIC SKETCH SHOWING ♦52 1Vatc 7 reidnwnl (lntern ,hate) (;;) l 1 rh,e^ n tr, ;« Ileda 7-10 FILTER OPERATION Y, t•..t r c\ , u mint,is :c,�,a,le. ,intermediate) SI. - y. cc,urse is , cal water quaiity control and treatment with emphasis Wash Waler Tank � I r ttic public he r i' c i,c «<:te•r supttly: sources of contamination; sanitary , tccts in r•,ut,ti «ate<r i.,.•;,i:,s .4urfaca water supplies and distribution sys- tems; water ,quaiax -r,ntrol tiu'thods; chemical treatment, Sedimentation, t 1 filtration, and softenii p;: opei-ition and maintenance of water treatment facil- ities and appurtenances: operatit,n recorck, and computations and other related 25 to3o' topi;•s. ' FI T'..e material i-ovored to tfic ii,termediate courses will be helpful to those r prepatutg for the Grade :iI \eater troatme•nt operator certification examination , 4otorLcyCl, I given by the California :mot .tion. AWWA• _ filtcrin9• I+ 453 Bus c Machint lc c r -,,, ; w, Pneuntalic•s f3) s, water Level 12 l030 9. `:. hour, r. _ woshiog. Wed. 7-10 F a A practical eou.re , , I .drniiic and pr.eurnatic fundamentals. Presents F' Z4TF-reeboa d. a hasic information regu.red, for good do ii and in�tailation. Covers such sub- E SeiltngBo31 { jcc Is pum} \ai\i.,, c\Imd •r, pr}> basic rirc_iits. J.I.C. standards. �__^#q rr .rn, ^rr ��,�r, :c•,�,ntt. m .,, ,t_,nancv rr,t,,mr, . .:n . ...•utit• .hta t --1 .'; 21'1o30' Sand. Controller.L,. .Under Dra in_>,, � +►r t __�`.—,—�� System. i s ro i Water S:croge. 44 a > ` I a _ )u? >tjj(,r Sysict:, Alaintenancc and Cnn,;trr:etian (3) rhr �iu,'c. Mono 7-10 Sewer. } €, A cour:•e ;n j ra,trc•il \rater system maintenance and construction. pub- je juts studied inchide wai,•r mains, services, hydrants, and meters. : , b ®•I!1 11"nlcr Sirpplrand Treatment (Basic) 13) ��S ffy=g lh c ho"'Ir, lecture. rues. 7 10 T c A basic c-our c in eater supple and treatment covering historical develop- { ! nurnt of vvoter quality control practices: water sources: public health aspects $ of water supply: ),eater chemistry water treatment arithmetic; chemical treat- ,t ment; filtration; softening,' corrosion, disinfection; tastes and odors in water; F bacteriology; hump operation and maintenance; valves, and meters. The material covered in this course will be specifically helpful to those preparin}C for the Grade IV water treatment operator certification examination g given by the California Section. AWWA, RONALD REAGAN, Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY LOS ANGELES REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD 205 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 408 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 February 9, 1967 City Council of Huntington Beach Council Chambers First Floor - Memorial Hall 6th and Magnolia Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: As you know, this Regional Board held a joint public hearing with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board on January 11, 1967 for the purpose of taking testimony relative to the establishment of Water Quality Control Policy for the waters of the Tidal Prism of the San Gabriel River. The Board requested that I write you expressing their deep thanks for the use of your Council Chambers for the conduct of this public hearing. Very truly yours, ,!� G � t� RAYM D M. HERTEL Executive Officer RMH:lt City of Huntington Beach + P.O. BOX ilia CALIFORNIA 925" ;4 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Match 9,1977 i Mr. Howard H. Hawkins, Chairman, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, 1111 Sun"set Boulevard, Los 'Angeles, Ca. 90054 i Dear Mr. Hawkins, In response to your letter dated February 16, 1977, we are enclosing a certified'copy of Resolution No., 4422 adopted by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach on February 22, 1977, supporting all efforts_ to reduce water waste and requesting citizens of the City to conserve water. Very truly yours, Alicia M Wentworth City Clerk Enc: OQO�`'C Ah wa rFRo .� � A - O GTyERN CA1\F OQ= The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Office of Board of Directors February 16, 1977 Howard H.Hawkins,Chairman Lynndon L.Aufdenkamp,Vice Chairman Hans H. Doe,Vice Chairman Samuel B. Nelson,Vice Chairman Milo Dellmann,Secretary D The Honorable Harriett Wieder Mayor, City of Huntington Beach FEQ 11977 City Hall 2000 Main street CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, California 92648 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE Dear Mayor Wieder: The District has undertaken an intensive campaign to inform all residents within its service area of the vital need for conserving water and energy. The continuing drought in Northern and Central California makes this even more essential. We are seeking your support in this endeavor. Enclosed is a copy of a resolution recently adopted by our Board of Directors. We hope your city council will adopt a similar resolution. If so, we would appreciate your sending us a copy. Also enclosed is a copy of a brochure describing several methods for conserving water around the home. The brochure is one element in our public information program. The brochures, along with posters, statement inserts and bumper strips, are being made available at cost to .our member agencies. The program also includes billboards, 150 of which are being located within our service area, and radio and television announcements, which are in production. Very truly yours, ff Howard H. Hawkins Chairman HHH/dlp Encls. 1111 Sunset Boulevard,Los Angeles,Calif./Mailing address: Box 54153,Los Angeles,Calif.90054/Telephone:(213)626-4282 RESOLUTION 7700 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ON CALIFORNIA DROUGHT WHEREAS, California suffered a severe drought in 1976, requiring the California State Water Project and the Federal Central Valley Project to draw heavily upon long- term storage to meet their water commitments, and WHEREAS, rainfall for the current water year has been substantially below normal, particularly in Northern California and the Central Valley, and, in the absence of major storms within the next few months, 1977 will be another year of serious drought which will cause water shortages in many communities and farming areas of the state, and WHEREAS, Governor Brown has asked for the coopera- tion and active participation of all public officials and people of the State of- California in conserving our water supplies during this drought, and WHEREAS, while Southern California, through pro- grams developed over many years by its water agencies, has an assured water supply and every necessary water use will be met, an active water conservation program is essential, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California urges every householder, farmer, and businessperson within Southern California to exercise the greatest care in the use of water so as to protect this valuable resource and avoid waste, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that every Southern California water supplier is requested to alert its customers to the necessity and means of saving water and to carefully monitor water uses to prevent waste, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is directed to utilize every means of assisting in the efforts of water suppliers to alert their customers, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to every county, city, and water supply entity within Resolution 7700 -2- Southern California. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California at its meeting held January 11, 1977. Executive Se retary The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California RESOLUTION NO. 4422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SUPPORTING ALL EFFORTS TO REDUCE WATER WASTE, AND REQUESTING CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO CONSERVE WATER WHEREAS, California suffered a severe drought in 1976, requiring water rationing and conservation measures in many parts of the State; and Rainfall for the current year has been-. substantially below normal, particularly in Northern California and, in .the absence , of major storms Within, the next few months , 1977 will 'be another year of serious drought which. will cause water shortages in many communities and farming areas of the State; and Although Orange County," through programs developed over many years , by Southern California water agencies, has an assured water supply, reducing local water consumption will make . more water available to needy parts of the State; and Governor Brown has asked for the cooperation and active participation of all public official's and citizens. of the 'State of California in conserving our water supplies , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of th'e City of 'Huntington Beach. supports every effort to prevent water Waste, and urges every citizen to exercise the greatest care in the use of water so as .to protect this vital resource . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd • day of February, 1977• ATTEST Alicia M, .W'entw' orth r City Clerk Mayor Deputy City Clerk /cs 1. INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTENT.: C ' -y Administrator Cit Attorney a i 2 . RE-. No: 4422 STATE""OF CALIFORNIA ) " COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: Y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that� the whole number of members of .the City Council -of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and.adopted by-the- affirmative. vote of more than a majority of all the members ;of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the . 22nd day i of February 19777 by the' following.vote: I AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Pattingon, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Wieder NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT Councilmen: Shenkman Alicia M: Wentworth City.Clerk and ex'-officio, Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach; California Byzt Deputy ity Clerk ti k i_�I�j�Ji CiTY OF HUNTINGTONCA 76- 70 - COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HI NI INGANV Bf 4C*1 To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd, G. Belsito., City Council Members Acting City Administrator Subject FOX MEADOW, INC. - DEVELOP- gate May 20, 1976 ER OF .A COMMERCIAL HORSE STABLE LOCATED SOUTH OF ELLIS AVENUE AND WEST OF GOLDENWEST STREET The City Council at its meeting of May 17, 1976 directed the appropriate city staff to meet and confe:r,'with representatives of Fox Meadow ,in order to determine the development status of the above r.eferonced pro- ject. A meeting was held on .May 1M .with ,a Air. .Les Paup and Ms. Bobbie Peterson, representing 'Fok Meadow, Inc. , and' staff representatives from the Departments of Planning, ,Building, Fire and Public Works. . The issues of concern and discussion involved the timing of building permit processing and the requirements and alternatives for water service to the sue. The Planning Commission conditionally approved the development on April 6, 1976. It was determined that hte conditions of approval as imposed by the Plan- ning Commission would have to be implemented prior to the use of the facility as a commercial horse stable. It has been consistently indicated to the applicant that normal permit processing requires completion of the mandatory conditions of approval prior to occupancy of the site for the intended commercial use. These conditions include the submittal of the following plans or documL-nts 'for review and approval : 1. A detailed and comprehensive grading plan. 2 . A landscape and irrigation plan. 3. Dedication of Ellis Avenue., 4. Assurance of participation in the local drainage assessment district. It should be noted, that the only required plan or document filed to date has been a grading plan which has been plan checked and forwarded for revisions. The concern of the water service was also discussed with the following two alternatives presented: 1 . Fox Meadow should attempt to work with adjacent property owners by offering to contribute their fair share of the Master Planned water main to be constructed in Ellis Avenue from Goldenwest westerly �( approximately 1 ,000 feet. Their fair share would be about $3,300 for the five acres . If the property owners could work out something immediately, the line could possibly be installed to meet their deadline of June 1st. CA 76- 70 - 2- May 20, 1976 2 . If arrangements cannot be met for the main line in Ellis Avenue , a meter could be set at Goldenwesi and Ellis for a temporary line to their property with the provision that an agreement be entered into which would require removal of .the temporary line when the main line is installed. In addition, a bond should be posted to assure the removal. It should be noted that Alternative # 2 is not recommended because this same solution would be requested by other surrounding property owners and result in a number of temporary lines with no .stimulus for a Master Planned line. Should the. Council concur on Alternative No. 2 direction for implementation to the. staff should -be made by the Council. The meeting was concluded. with the applicant agreeing' to submit the necessary plans and water service determination so as' to allow final processing of the proposed development' in a manner consistent with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code requirements. Respectfully submitted, Floyd Belsito Actin - City Administrator FGB:p • r o 1 ® P.O. Box ISO CALIFORNIA 92646 1 HO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT March 31, 1976 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Water Main in Ellis Avenue West of Goldenwest Gentlemen: Several horse stables apparently will be in business on Ellis Avenue west of Goldenwest Street. There is not presently a water main in that section of Ellis. The new City ordinance requires water facilities for fire protection purposes. There are two alternatives to the problem: 1. Allow the owners to reactivate or drill new water wells. 2. The City and. the owners share the initial cost equally of a project consisting of a master plan water main (12") with reimbursement to both as other properties connect. The water wells are of limited value to the owners and no value to the City. Attached is a sketch showing the area of the properties of the planned horse stables. The estimated cost of the 12" main is $20.00 per foot or $26,680.00 for the frontage shown on the sketch. If this general area is to be put to this type of use for at least the next five years, I believe we should encourage cooperative projects of this nature. If that is the opinion of the City Council I recommend the staff be instructed to prepare necessary agreements for a cooperative project. Very truly yours, 0 V. -IHOart g VA Director of ]Public Works HEH:ae , F'EIONAL DISTRICT MAP - -1I CLEGEND A.kOSwTn N sb Aa8®v HUNTINGTON BEACH GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP i TALBERT AVE. rl ca a CF-R IfRfgTDi3TON GEWiRAI.PkAit) jL rEl 1 �lennee B�eaA Cu�r�{ e --� § or a- c� s / o d GARFIELD AVE. rfa�a.l/ pe i .d Equestrian Facility May 17, 1976 Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach, California Dear Council Members: Fox Meadow., Inc. has been granted a Conditional Use Permit (76-03) for temporary stable usage on a five acre site located on the south side of Ellis bet Goldenwest and Bdwardr. As of this date, the acreage is still totally undeveloped and barren of anysnproveeents other than a sign. e existing stable of Meadowlark Faroe Is prepared to stove a large percentage , of its boarders and portable facilities to the new site and to be assimilated by Fox Meadow. Time is pressing as developawt for a housing tract is scheduled to begin within a mouth which will displace Meadowlark Phrms. lbx Meadow,, Inc. is prepared to cooperate with the City of Huntington Beach in any way necessary and to pay any accompanying fees in order to acquire water for the stable site. We have been bandied from pillar to post in our aff;iit to gain water. Pbx Meadow earnestly requests the attention of the City Council in order to clarify our dealings with the Department of Public Works. Fox Xadow aims to provide an excellent facility that will be an asset to the City of 11untington Beach. Thank you for reading this letter. Sincerely., FOX MMM.0 INC Leslie W. •Paup, President LWP.-Jm cc® Kathy Gerjets, Treasurer Donna Paup, Vice President Bobbie Petersen, Secretary may 16, 1976 Norma Gibbs, Councilwoman Huntington Beach City Council Huntington Beach, California Dear Norms: I have attempted to contact you several times by telephone but bave been unsuccessful so am hoping that you will have an opportunity to read this at the Council Meeting Monday evening. It is my understanding that a decision will be made in connection with waiving the 412,000 drainage fee for Mbx Meadows Boarding Stable to be located between Xdwards and Goldenwest, Just off Ellis. BW Interest in this matter is that I have boarded my horse at Meadowlark Farms for almost seven years and've now bsoe to locate elsewhere. Bobbie Petersen has lived on these premises with her husband and three daughters and aged Meadowlark Farms for over ten years and is nov trying to relocate at Fox Meadows along with her trainers, and they have been working with the Planning Oommission and various city officials for some time so that every- thing has been approved up to this point. The drainage fee would be an exhorbitent expense for them since they don't own the lead and already have Invested a considerable sum in order to meet all of the regulations. I can personally recommend all of the people involved in Fox Meadows and also the p ople who will be boarding their horses. We have been like a family involved in community activities, and Meadowlark Farms has been a learning and recreational center for cagy young people. They have had the opportunity to vetch foals being born and trained as this is also a thoroughbred breeding farm-, they have participated in many horse shows and assisted with putting on our own shows, and these young people have learned, not only to be excellent equestrians, but how to really care for their horses and work as a group for the benefit of all. We have formed the Meadowlark Jumping Drill Team and performed at local horse shows and parades. lust Ally bth we won a trophy at the Huntington Beach July 4th Parade and have been invited to participate again this year. We would like to be able to continue to represent Ematington Beach and have been practicing regula* for this event but at this point there is a great deal of concern about relocating seventy or eighty horses within the next few weeks. The other problem facing us is getting a water line in from Goldenwest, and It is my hope that you and the other Council members can advise We. Petersen on this matter at the meeting, I know that you as an educator realize how despeaately we need more recreational areab for our young people and hope that you can help us to relocate at Fox Meadows. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, bbk 6ecr:Irlyl ® e►adowlark J ing cc: Mrs. Bobbie Petersen Huntington Beach City Oouncil Members Ile City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 100 CALIFORNIA 02660 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK February 24, 1977 Municipal Water District of Orange County P. 0. Box 315 17332 Irvine Blvd. Suite G Tustin, CA 92680 Attention: Dennis E. Maclain, General Manager Dear Mr. Maclain: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, February 22, 1977 adopted Resolution No. 4422 supporting all efforts to reduce water waste and requesting citizens of the City to conserve water. We are forwarding a certified copy of Resolution No. 4422 for your information. Very truly yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AM:CB:wm encl. 1 i i RESOLUTION NO. 4422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SUPPORTING ALL EFFORTS TO REDUCE WATER WASTE, AND REQUESTING CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO CONSERVE WATER i WHEREAS, California suffered a severe drought in 1976, requiring water rationing and conservation measures in many parts of the State; and Rainfall for the current year has been substantially below normal, particularly in Northern California and, in the absence of major storms within the next few months, 1977 will be another year of serious drought which will cause water shortages in many communities and farming areas of the State; and Although Orange County, through programs developed over many years by Southern California water agencies, has an assured water supply, reducing local water consumption will make more water available to needy parts of the State; and Governor Brown has asked for the cooperation and active participation of all public officials and citizens of the State of California in conserving our water supplies,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach supports every effort to prevent water waste, and urges every citizen to exercise the greatest care in the use of water so as to protect this vital resource . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of February, 1977 .• ATTEST: Alicia M. Wentworth � City Clerk Mayor 91 Deputy City Clerk /cs 1, INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONTENT: C ' y Administrator Cit Attorney 2, k.,,. No. 4422 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of February 1977 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Pattinson Coen Gibbs Siebert Wieder NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Shenkman Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City \ of Huntington Beach, California P By. Deputy ity Clerk w DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 0[ah TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Department ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator DATE: February 23, 1977 SUBJECT: 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Process Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments requires the preparation and implementation of areawide water quality management plans. The Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board have designated SCAG as the responsible 208 planning agency for the South Coast area (which includes Orange County and the western portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties) , and have awarded SCAG approximately $2. 8 million to complete the areawide plan by November 1, 1978. 6pecifically, Section 208 requires the development of a comprehensive and continuing areawide waste treatment management planning process which addresses the following priority issues: a) water quality problems caused by nonpoint sources (e.g. surface runoff) , b) the relationships between air and water quality, c) the development of institutional arrange- ments necessary for 208 plan implementation. The first phase of the 208 planning process will include data collection, water quality problem identification, analysis and prioritization. Phase II will focus on developing control and abatement measures, and developing and analyzing plan alternatives , as well as final plan selection and adoption. Orange County has entered into a cooperative agreement with SCAG to complete Phase I work tasks. Other agencies entering into cooperative agreements include: Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties; City of Los Angeles; Newport-Irvine Waste Management Planning Agency (NIWA) ® Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and the Ventura County Regional Sanitation District (VCRSD) . (See attached Planning Department trans- mittal dated February 18, 1977 for additional information on 208. ) A proposed 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process has been forwarded to the City of Huntington Beach by SCAG for review and comment (attached) . (The grant agreement with EPA requires that SCAG provide evidence of local governments support and acceptance of the Plan Approval and Adoption Process . ) City Staff of the Planning and Public Works Departments have received the Qroposed Plan Approval and Adoption Process and have found it to be satis- �,actory. No changes are recommended. r � t Page Two RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Express City Council support of the 208 Plan Approval and Adoption Process. Respectfully submitted, irre Selic Director EDS:EJ:gc Attachments Estimated Da; _:_o f�'Adoption-Process Notification of Approval by Executive Adoption by Adoption by Major Planning Opportunity to Affected Public Committee I1nplementing Executive Products Review; Comment Agencies Hearing Approval Agencies Coamittee Milestone Report - This report will docununt June,1977 July,1977 July,1977 August,1977 N.A.* N.A.* the results of_7cata collection and analyses performed to date, including a summary of applicable water quality goals and standards, PHEL data collection and analysis, utility systems data and plans, nonpoint source assessments, and air quality/water quality inter-relationships. Early Action Program Design - The early September,1977 Uctober,1977 October,197 November,1977 November,1971 December,1977 action program designed to initiate early resolution of selected representative water quality problems will be documented in this report. Issue Paper I: Alternatives for the Region -. October,1977 November,197 November, December,1977 N.A.* N.A.* / This issue paper will review alternative non- 1977 point source control and abatement measures and preliminary 208 alternatives for the South Coast region. Issue Paper II: Evaluation and Comparison of March,1978 April,1978 April ,1978 May,1978 N.A.* N.A.* Alternative Plans - This issue paper will review preliminary evaluations and compari- sons of alternative plans and incorporate results of analyses of utility systems impacts, and forecasts of wasteloads. r. Continuing Planning Program Design - This May,1978 June,1978 June,1978 July,1978 July,1978 August,1978 report will review the continuing planning program designed for arriving at solutions to water quality problems that are long- term in nature, and will be incorporated into the final 208 plan. Draft 208 Plan Report - This report will pre- June,1978 July,1978 July,1978 August,1978 N.A.* N.A.* sent the recommended 208 plan and supporting data and analyses. The draft report will receive region-wide review and comment through public hearinqs and other review and comment mechanisms. Final 208 Plan Report - The final 208 plan August-October, August- N.A. October, August- November,1978 yui1T consist o t e raft 208 plan modified 1978 October, 1978 October. to incorporate comments received and will 1978 1978 also include separate sections for each of the major sub-areas in the South Coast 208 area. Adoption of 201 Plans to be completed under local adoption N.A.* under will occur process local adop- when local tion proces adoption has been co leted. Note: in the interest of time, where possible, major planning products may be grouped for the review, approval, Public Hearing and Adoption process. * adnntinn of these Products is not necessary because they will be used as inputs to a later product. ®� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council y ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: H. E. Hartge, Director of Public Works DATE: August 5, 1977 SUBJECT: Model Ordinance Prohibiting Water Wastage STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The Orange County Board of Supervisors has passed a resolution recommending that .each city. within the County adopt the attached model ordinance. Section 4 (Prohibitions). includes the restriction of outside watering between the hours of 10 a.m, and 4 p.m.. RECOMMENDED ACTION : Records of water usage indicate that residents. have volun­t, tarily conserved water by an average of 12% for the period of May through July. Therefore, the proposed model ordinance should be held in abeyance pending a month-by—month review of water consumption. ANALYSIS In April the Council passed a resolution requesting the cooperation of residents to. voluntarily conserve water, ,and reduce consumption by 150 .. For the period May through July, . there has been a 12% reduction in water usage from the corre- sponding period in 1976 . The proposed water ordinance will affect all water users and will require additional personnel to handle complaints and enforcement., In view of the voluntary reduction in water usage for the last three months, the consideration of adopting the ordinance should be deferred until a later date. HEH:EAE:jy Attach. ATIACHMENT II 1 CITY, COUNTY AND DISTRICT MODEL GRDINA'_ICE 2 PROHIEITIJN OF WATZR WASTAGE 3 4 Introduced by Secon._ed by ' 5 6 Section 1 7 The [City Council ] ' [Board of Supervisors ] (Board of 8 Directors) of hereby find and determines that : 9 A. This [city] [county] [district ] ,. its industries and 10 residents rely to 'a considerable extent upon water imported from 11 outside [city] [county] [district ] boundaries ; 12 B. Many parts of the state rely heavily upon the same sources 13 this (city) [county] [district ) relies upon; 14 C. Rainfall for the current water year has been substantially 15 below normal in the watersheds supplying these sour-:es and , there 16 is a serious drought w`iich is causing water shortages in many 17 communities and farming areas of the state, and 18 D. These shortages will cause this [city, [county) [district ) , ! 19 its residents , businesses and industries to suffer adversely because! 20 (1) shortages in agricultural and industrial products may occur i 21 resulting in higher prices and (2) unemployment and decrease in 22 economic activities may be felt statewide and, as a cnnsequence, 23 an active water conservation program is essential to protect against 24 drought , and help alleviate statewide shortages , and 25 E. For the reasons expressed in this section, [the City Coun- 26 cil) [Board of Supervisors ] [Board of Directors ) finds the water ® R 0102--173 . ] uses prohibited and restricted by this Ordinance to be suppressed 2 or regulated , and to be waste constituting a public nuisance and 3 therefore should be prohibited pursuant to [e.g. this city' s/ 4 county' s authority to enact general police power regulations 5 including its authority to prohibit nuisances ) [ this district ' s 6 authority to establish water use restrictions pursuant to e . g. , 7 Water Code Section 71644) . 8 Section 2 . Definitions 9 For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms , 10 phrases , words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given i 11 herein. When not inconsistent with the context , words used in the 12 present tense include the future, words in the plural number include! 13 the singular number, and words in the singular number include the 14 plural number. The word "shall" is always mandatory and not cr.erely 15 directory. ' J f 16 A. ["City" ) ["County" ] ["District" ) is the ["City" ] ["County" ] � 17 ["District" ] of 18 B. "Person" is any individual, firm, partnership, association, 19 company, organization of any kind . 20 C. "Water" is water supplied by [name uCilities supplying 2.1 water] [district ] . 22 Section 3 . Application 23 The provisions of th _s Ordinance shall apply to all per- 24 sons using water in this [city] [county] [district ] , regardless 25 of whether any person using water shall have a contract for water y 26 service. Sections 4 through 9 are hereby added to the 2 . ® F0192-173 . r 1 Code to read as follows : 2 Section 4 , Prohibitions 3 A. Gutter Flooding 4 No person shall cause or permit any water furnished to , 5 any property within the [city] [county] [district ] to run or zo 6 escape from any hose, pipe, valve, faucet , sprinkler or irrigation 7 device into any gutter or otherwise to escape from the property 8 if such running or escaping can reasonably be prevented . 9 B. hushing hard surfaced areas 10 (1) No person shall use any water " furnished to any pro- 11 perry within the [city] [county] [district ] to wash sidewalks , 12 walkways, driveways, and parking lots , by hosing. 13 (ii) No person shall wasl-i boats , automobiles or trailers 14 on hard-surfaced areas such as driveways , parking lots , lamas , 15 streets and roads, by hosing. 16 C. Irrigation 17 (i) No person shall water or irrigate any shrubbery,. trees , 18 lawns, grass , ground covers, plants , vines , gardens , vegetables, 19 flowers, or other vegetation between the hours of .10 :00 a .m. and 20 4 :00 p.m. 21 (ii) This section shall not apply to operations and busi- 22 nesses engaged in commercial agriculture, farming and nurseries . 23 (The industry should strive to reduce consumpton of water by 10%1 24 as requested by the Municipal Water District , and in doing so 25 comply to the spirit and intent of this ordinance. ) 26 D. Ornamental Facilities 1 3 . 1 No person shall refill any fountain, pool or other facility containing water solely for ornamental purposes emptied 3 during the effectiveness of this Ordinance. 4 E. Leaks � 5 No person shall permit leaks of water which he has the 6 authority to eliminate. . 7 F. Restaurants 8 Restaurants shall only serve water to customers upon 9 request . 10 G. No person shall cause or permit water under his control 11 to be wasted . 12 Section 5 . Exemptions 13 persons may be exempted from application of this Ordinance. l 14 to a certain type of use if [the supplier of water] [the General s 15 Manager of the District ] issues a permit allowing such use and if 16 i such permit issuance is based on a finding that enforcement of the {. 17 applicable restriction would either; (1) cause an unnecessary 18 and undue hardship to the applicant or the public ; or (2) would 19 cause or threaten an emergency cnndition affecting the health, 20 sanitation, fire protection, or safety of the applicant or the 21 public . 22 [If the water system is city or county owned IT if 23 a district is enacting the ordinance] 24 The water department [General Manager of the District ] may 25 require the use of such water conservation devices or practices as 26 it [he] deems appropriate as a condition of the exemption permit . 4. e ® r otor-03 I It [he ] shall promulgate a list of approved devices . Section 6 . Enforcement 3 A. [ Icentify job classifications] of the [City or County 4 Water Department, Public Works Department , and Fire Department ) 5 [the District ] have the duty and are hereby authorized to enforce 6 the provisions of this Ordinance and shall have all the powers 7 and authority contained in California Per:al Code .Section 836 . 5 , 8 including the power to issue written notice to appear. 9 B. [Cities and Counties ] Each lau enforcement officer. of 10 the [city] [county) shall, in connection with his duties imposed 11 by law, diligently enforce the provisions of this Ordinance . 12 Section 7 . Penalties 13 [Authority of agency to impose specified penalties 14 should be confirmed . ] .15 Prior to enforcement pursuant to Section 6 , any person 16 who is suspected of violating this Ordinance shall be given a 17 preliminary notice in writing of such violation, with the des- 18 cription of violation set forth in such preliminary not:_ces . 19 Such person shall have 24 hours to correct such violation, or j 20 termir_ate the use. If. the violation is not corrected' or the use 21 terminated, the [Water Department ] [District General Manager] 22 may forthwith [either (a) disconnect service, (b) instail flow-- 23 restricting devices restricting water service or (c) order issued 24 a second preliminary notice . ] [Service disconnected or restricted 25 pursuant to (a) or (b) shall be restored only upon payment of the 26 turnon and other charges fixed by the [City Council ] [Board of 5 . 1 Directors /Supervisors ] as provided in . � 2 Any person who has received a preliminary notice of violation of 3 a particular provision of this Ordinance and against whom [the 4 Water Department] [District General Manager] has taken action ; 5 pursuant to this sec t'-on and who has not corrected or terminated 6 the use, or at a subsequent time violates the same provisions of 7 this Ordinance, regardless of whether the type of use was prev- 8 iously specified in any preliminary notice of violation, shall be 9 guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than 10 $500 or imprisonment in '-the county jail for not more than 30 days 11 or both such fine and imprisonment . 12 Each day any violation of this Ordinance is committed or 13 permitted to enntinue shall constitute a separate offense and 14 shall be punishable as such hereunder. 15 Section 8 . Nonapplicat_ion of ordinance 16 A. This Ordinance shall be inoperative to the extent any 17 u re lations and restrictions ado to Division 1, g . adopted pursuant � 18 Chapter 3 , of the Water Code conflict. 19 Section 9 . Severability of parts of ordinance 20 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the [City i 21 Council] [Board of Supervisors/Directors ] that the sections , 22 paragraphs, sentences, clauses , and phrases of this Ordinance are 23 severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or 24, section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or 25 otherwise invalid by the valid judgment or decree of a court of 26 competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality or invalidity 6 . n r i i I shall not affect any of the remaining phrases , claus�.s, scntenca 2 Paragraphs, and sections of this Ordinance . 3 Section 10. 4 The rcity Clerk] [County Cleric] [Clerk] is hereby 5 directed to post/publish this Ordinance for the period and in the 6 manner required by 7 i 8 ORDERED PUBLISHED THIS day of 1977 9 ADOPTED THIS day of 19773, by the `olloicing 10 votes : 11 AYES : i 12 NOES : 13 ABSENT : i 14 15 16 17 Mayor ! 18 19 20 21 Attest • ty ounty er 22 23 24 25 // ! 26 7 . i P 0102-173 Don P. Bonfa, To City Attorney Date 6/ /77 i ORDINANCE NO. 2195--WATER WASTAGE Please coordinate with City staff and come back with a more workable ordinance. ;r- RETURN TO Signed ,{ ployd fi. Pelsito, City Administrator Date Signed Radillrm 45 465 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT. Poly Pak 150 setsl 4P465 PART WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. �I City of Huntington Beach U�+�J P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 9, 1977 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: Floyd G. Belsito. Subject: Water Wastage Ordinance Dear Council Members : Due to the drought conditions throughout the State and the imminent threat of water rationing, it is essential that our water waste ordinance be explicit in its. statements. Existing Ordinance 14. 16. 020 is possibly too general. We are recommending more specific language for clarification, including a definition of reasonable exceptions and specify- ing penalties for violation. It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance 21 repealing and adding certain sections to the Municipal Code pertaining to water wastage. Very truly yours, gE Har Director of ' Public Works HEH:MZ:jy l ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE i BY REPEALING AND ADDING CERTAIN SECTIONS PER- TAINING TO WATER WASTAGE WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach, its industries and residents rely to a considerable extent upon water imported from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the Colorado River, and large i quantities of energy are consumed in transporting this water to the city and to many parts. of the state; and If shortages of water and energy occur in California, this City and its residents, businesses and industries may suffer adversely due to agricultural and industrial product shortages resulting in higher prices, unemployment and a decrease in econom- ic activity statewide; and Because water is a vital resource, Governor Brown has asked for the cooperation and active participation of all public officials and citizens of the State of California in conserving water supplies; and The water uses prohibited and restricted by this ordinance are non-essential and, if continued, would constitute an energy wastage; and For the reasons expressed herein, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach finds wastage of water to be a public nuisance which should be controlled, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by repealing Section 14.16.020 thereof. SECTION 2. The Huntington Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding thereto Sections 14 .16. 015, 14 .16 . 020, 14 .16. 025 to read as follows : MT:cs 1 . 14 .16 . 015 Use of water--Waste . It shall be unlawful, and no person shall waste water furnished by the City of Huntington Beach to his property by allowing said water to run or to escape from any hose, pipe, valve, faucet , sprinkler or irrigation device into any gutter, drainage system, body of water or over any private property not owned by such person or over any public property . A violation of this section is an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500) . 14 .16. 020 Use of water--Exception. This chapter shall not apply to any commercial farming operation engaged in the production of crops for economic gain, nor to any emergency where life or property is in danger. 14 .16. 025 Use of water--Exemption permit . The city administrator may, at his discretion, grant an exemption permit to allow uses of water otherwise prohibited by this chapter, provided that such proposed use does not waste water and involves the use of such water conservation devices or practices as the city administrator at his discretion determines to be appropriate. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause same to .be published within fifteen days after adoption in the Huntington Beach News , a weekly news- paper of general circulation, printed and published in Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of June, 1977. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: b, City 4AamTinistrator City Attorn J 2. INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: I G 3. 14 . i6 . 010--14 . 16. 040 9 1 6. 100 1-, ire hydrants--Maintenance. 14 . 1 . 10 Fire hydrants--Use . 14 . 16 . 1 Fire hydrants--Permits for specia se . 14 . 16 . 130 e hydrants--Use permit can lation. 14 . 16. 1110 hire drants--Obstructin ccess . 14 . 16. 150 Pressure intenance or but off. 14. 16 . 160 Drawing wat into eam boilers . 14 . 16 . 170 Violations repo ed• 14. 16. 180 Sale of wat outs - city. 14. 16. 190 Protect ' cross-tonne ons . 14 . 16 . 010 n _fire . No person steal e any water for Irrigation or, ,y steady flow during the progres f any fire in the city ess for protection of property, and all 1. - igation. and s nkling shall immediately be stopped when an ala of f is sounded in .any part of the city, and shall not be b n 14 . 16 . 020 Waste from improper fixtures . No person shall waste water or allow it to be wasted by imperfect or leaking stops , valves , pipes , closets, faucets or other fixtures , or use water closets without self-closing valves , or use the water for purposes other than those named in the application upon which rates for water are based, or use it in violation of any of the provisions of any ordinance of this city, provided further that no person shall drain or permit water to drain upon any public street or alley , or over any private property not owned by such person. (Ord. 674, 11/57 ) . J(5 • y wate ieters installed or required to be installed by the tit water de tment shall remain at all times the property o he city and sh be maintained, repaired and renewed by LIe water department when ndered unserviceable by normal w and tear. (Ord. 674 , 11/57) . 14 . 16 . 040 Meters--Re cement or air. Where replacements , repairs or adjustments of any ter e rendered necessary by an act resulting from malice , care ess or neglect of the consumer or any member of h' family, any one employed by him, and any damage whit nay result from of water, or steam: from water heater, b er or otherwise , sha1. e charged to and paid for by such nsumer to the water departmen ri presentation ofa bill the Tor; and in case such bill is not pa the water, shall be . t off from such premises and shall not be t ed on -again it all charges are paid. No person shall interfer wi or remove from -any service any water meter which has been 398 Li 'WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY _ j, CITY OF HUNTATON BEACH No. "BLUE-CITY CLERK _ GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR 'L ` CANAIF2Y -DEPARTMENTAL REQUEST for ORDINANCE or .RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department i May 3 , 1977 N. E. Hartge Public Works INSfRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance.In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or- is rF hereby requested: Pr enare a revisio,n to the ordinance reclardina th(n WaStac e C7 SMate_-, p3tter'ned _Fier the atf:.acheri. Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance City Attorney— Please prepare and submit printed copies to fhis office by: City Administrator I Arridavit ,of Publication ®. 1974. Hl►{,hngtGn BsaCtr�lavv0, k1a+l ORDINANCE NO. 1919 State of California AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY'OF HUNT- County of Orange Ss IW;TON ` BEACH AMENDING THE CityOf Huntington Beach I HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE i + COnO BY ADDING THERETO SECTIONS George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he Is a 34CO THROUGH 3464 PERTAINING"TO citizen Of the United Stated, Over the age of twenty-one years. CONSTRUCTION AND ABANDONMENT That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach of WATER NCEWEL To INCORPORATE P ��f3Y� REFERENCE PROVISIONS CON- News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- "AO WED IN ORANGE"COUNTY 011110,1- lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said NANCE NO. 2607 County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination The City Council of the City of Hunt. of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide Ington Beach doe.; ordain its follows-. subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been SECTION 1, The Huntington Beach established, printed and published in the State of California, and Ordinance Cone is hereby amended by Count of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication adding thereto follows:ections 34t+0 through Y 3464 to read as follows: of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not 3460. ADOPTION,' OF COUNTY REGU-'I devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any LATIONS. Except as herein otherwise particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or rrovided, that certain document entitled i 'Ordinance No. 2601 of the County Of any number thereof. Orange relating .:.to construction ' and The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper abandonment of wells as compiled and Of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court adopted by the County of Orange, throe of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. (3) copies of which have been filed with ,.the City Clerk,of the City of Huntingfton 'Beach for use `and examination by the That the 01WI.NAWiE NO. 1919 public, is hereby adopted and enacted as the Well Construction and Abandon- ment Ordinance of the'City of 1 uotlgg- ton Beach ai: 'fully, as thou4h palne were set forth herein, and for' of which the.annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- purposes stated therein. 3461. M.E REQUIR NTS AUGMENT'EX- ISTING- REGULATIONS.' The iequire-) paper at least one Issue ments of this article shall be In addition rto any. ether requirements' of the City �� of Huntington Beacli, and before � a commencing from the a .!"`— day of •.- -�X------- permit is Issued by the city, satisfactory i proof.of compliance with all-provisions i relating thereto must be presented to 1974 and ending on the � day of Ma.y the O(reptnr of Public Works. 3462. DESIGNATION OF A D V I S O R Y BOARD. The Qrange County Well.`Stan- 19 4' both days inclusive, and as often during said period and Cards Advi_ y Ordinance No.Board, establish 2b#7 by Clrarlge County dptad times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the July 18, 1972, Is hereby desigr►a(ed as regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a the Well Standards Advisory "13ptird of B t ti f H the city o Huntington each. ' supplement, and said notice was published therein on 'the following; �. 3463. ADAPTATION OF DESIGNATIONS. dates, to-wit: (a) Any reference to "unincorporated territory" in said Ordinance' 'No. 2607 May 23 , 19 74 shall mean "territory within,the bound- arias of the city." (b) Reference to Government .Code Section 28US in said Ordinance No. 2607 shaft mean Section 38773.5 of the Gov-,' /�' ernment Code, the appropriate Sectional applicable to cities. — ublisher 3464. PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE. The City Council shall adopt, by resoiulion Subscribed and sworn to before me this --2ii th—_— day of an appropriate permit fee schedule for Construction, reconstruction and abate �� men( of abondonad wells. _ M— 8.x----, 1924 . II``C� T1,ON..2,..This arrr��ir►f4rc'e ghall,take, 4GP1>12Q-�S►" �k.6 dHe thiFtjr tfays.aflor�i 4:itdophcan. ^rlr4; l Pr r rCr G /7 G)ty Clerk ,shall certify to filet 'the passage,: i e , Notary Public of this ordinance and`cause the " �CCC t JJJB�t O^"► Orange County, California of be ptiQn'inPUblis4e within fifteen n days trotter adoption'in the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of gorteral, rr Circulation, printed and puttlishad in. L:6,)eY^n'er< ECO�r;' Huntington Beach, California. ' ` PASSED AND ADOPTED by the, .City Cvrlre *Council of the CITY of Huntingtgn. Beach, r THO;'v AS D. WYLLI E at a regular roesting thereof held on the Notary Public•Caffornla 2Oth day of May, Q974. krtckat5(v'4 code, Orange County ALVIN M. COEN �h My Commission Expires Mayor ' 5epfember 12, 1974 ATTEST: Va11�fllrviceati� ALICIA M. WENTWORTH •��` City Cferk -STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTING BEACH I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly' elacte t, fl"VR iad City.CUsrk, of, th_* Ci_tys..., of Huntington _ .....,..N.... ........ . Beach and ex-oTricid lCity of the City Council' of'the said City;'I do hereby certify that the whole number_ of members of the City Council of thQ City of Huntington Beach is seven; that' the foregoing ordinance was read toy said City Council at a regular malting thereof held on the 6th day of May:, 3 tOrt°� 1 19.74, arW was again read to said' City Council at a regular. malting thereof held on the 20th day of May, 1974, and was passed and adopted by the affirma- tive vote of Mora than 'a malorig.of all the members of said City Council,' AYES: Councilmen; Duke, Bartlett, Gibbs, t. Coen, Matney, .Wieder, .ShhAay NWS; Councilmen; i None' ABSENT: Councilmen: None ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk and ex-offjcio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California iv, g. I A ppt, M110" • IR ]s,:4j, s 3 5 v1�, yo i 1111.'Jil.", W'111�-' kip SH qq. -gag-tu, N, g YMP y. 112 t, A%gr '? r 1 gg';k �g rprt 7 igil - 41, , "mv a. ig ,ggg,pa r _ q�tE gjg 1, ' 4I . . ,t P m; lv W :, Wl , ' Irl U , l WWvIjsl i nNN . . % ... IT�11-V,q�gl t7t1N� it! pill iT V"T go " ! 1 ( El. iV .ttt, 'ji a� r4 I WI 1 vsMI �1VVJj aIIL Ph k SA WRC! i!Vr aju JIM Itr Nv p F,, N t j� L Te o ,11'k R"n", ff r. Li �oR 4 1wNO Obi UMM MD. 2607 Ail U1410CE ADDING ARTICLE 2 TO "MIDU S, Soo. 4S.02d. Well Standard* AdviWry gtwN. Tag CODIFIED O80I%AWU Or TUt A board conolstina of five asobers shall be 4WLAtoj by COiMY of O"A", CALUOSOIA Cho Hoard of euppaarvtoot*. one of the saubmrs appo kneed &ball be a parson mplryad in a supervisory capRatty y a Water purvoyet in the County of Oraaas whose sYYstam to on to m elsnitteout rite board of Supervisors of the County of Orange,' California, do extant upon tround water; "A shall be a rsaaatotardod civil saainsor under the laws of tits State of Californis who to esa®sridrnsod to sanitary ongirwarina and who to qualified in tha field of water i1;CTIOp 1. Article 1 is hereby added to Division 5, Title 4 of the supply owe shall bs a person licooead to eacordaraae with tits ,',Aiflcpd Ordia". 4 4 of the County of Oranoo tw reed *r followrc provisiona of the Contractors Lizauso L.w. Ch otor $. Division J of the PraaLnaas end professions Coder of Cho Stat* of California; she shall be a person who is qualified to the tiold of water AVICLS 2 r quality and one&shall ba a regiotarod �ma q��t murder the lows of three dtsty of CAlttoruts wbo is qualified la tba firold of Construdttam and Abandowe*nt'of Wells grouatd wacar hydrate&y Otto'of the sfogctseattisnod persons Shall bs & reprasantetive of tiro or a Cauttty water District and cam it sec. 45:921. Furpooe. shalt rop'rasaat the orpPse Cat ; (rotor poollution UV4rb - It is the purpose of this article to coacrol the construction Members shall err" for s three Yost toga and until the a:nd reeomseruatton et Walla to the scq that the ground "sear of gwitfic&Cton of a omcasaoor, &xcatpt that the first trmre!*are at*" thio County will not be impaired to gdalley and that water serve assaagggrad tatoa, ar datemiaad bbyy the drawift of lots, in sbtainod ftwwt such well& "Lill be suLtable for the purpose for the tollowoipg taannrrl Ono woa@sor othall lax tar a tame Y041 ad hich Weed c will not jeoperdiao eke health "lacy or welfare term of office; twotwoobers stuall carve fax 4 we year cam at 41 the peeple of this County and to• rrovide for the destruction office; two vranbore shall servo #or a throw year t4wU of office. :l at.Amdwcdsd ire! r or walla t to n• pap¢llc tzulsoocrr to the All tones shall and on tbo first ftMMy La,! !37 N$ the yaor a>bad that such walls will net ut"tr the quality of ground water in which such term to to expisa. o, athtorwioe )eoparcitse the health, safely ar wolfars of the �"Vld of this County. Traveling and other a®atl" Larurrid b joord 021*0r 43.0YY to the perfotmsnce of big o9fidi4t iletf4 SM# � DrfinitLow.. at a rots of $ 0.00 per (teat". As aim® in this article, the fallowisW Mrds &ball have ties goo. 45.024. Auto prohibited. ►neigh wel"1 . ""nit( prawided in this awtion. T liAltDiDtiSS Reel MAhtD Kpf. M tetsns "abandoned" or "sbdndatnrennt" Ho person *ball, within eb* lied ac�t U fir County of Oran&*, cosstruac air aw well finless such t :;hall aq psly to a wall which has not basso used for a period of one ceneteuctLoo ns or recotruetLen is oarriamd out parsuoutt to MAyear, no ads the aowaor 4"Larea in writing, to the Mall Standards in coaforwnnce with a mrittem perolit LOpued 90 ubra pub Advtaory Shard, hie intention to uao the Omit aaato for supplying by Hess poalth officer as prowias/ lit thin a"1414. he "tor or atr seaestoced purpose (such er an ervation wall or Weogiau "oil) and receivos royal at such.declaration tree Nor shall an web anew a Well Wdsr+opp Lt boo beft ha bosrd. All Raab derlaratiato Alt be reamed annually and destroyed pursuant to aid to s�a a whirh 0 trt440" Pogo" at easch ties be resubmitted to the Board for approval. Toot Lowed by the Health Officer. "aloa dad Mqlagatowy holes ®!tall be considered abandoned twaacy- fuur hnlea altar construction work has boon coxplotad, unload Not obeli &ny such parreow violate the 9000 of arty e9449 uthe"Loo rtgrrtwrsd by the health officer. issuod by the Hall Stsndocds Advisory too" #.1 tpa'!l"1116 A0t i3.TIf1AL, WMA.. A water well used to supply water for irrtaa- Officer, issued pursuant to this art99sl0. clout or other algriewltursl puspeseut. inoludino, se-called stock 6N. WOW Forimus. bwolla. CAT1�DIaC PsdrEC IQU VELL. An artificial excavation in excess of Applications ouch for porralto doll M twlre to a gMalth Officer 10 foot constructed by any oothod for the purpose of installtho aoweaitnntng Raab tt►tetrastlm ss b* shah sso¢)nise. Ryas or facilitiae for the Protection. • &etrically, of Swab sppltsetl+m shall be sacoshpawilsd by a too whisk Aell taltia svya+tptawat to contact with Cho Brausd, omtsottly ratsrre4 be eatabltabrd 4y the 8emri of Stapatviaors to the 4swie of tYoo to as a cdetwdia protection well or a door anode. cost incurred in onfe"LP4 the provialaxa of tit o article. COag7OITY WATER SUPPLY Wbn.L. A water wall mood to l water ►tit7 pthe it 1 at the fag if WWIL 1&a to 011 a�pltcagt supp y aboanld the prrwlt bs dwis� o: tf tb�a ipsrrtit is eancallasl within tzar dareaeia puspoaaa 45 ayrtasAs wb)act to Chapter 1 of Part I elattyy (40) dayo &fees tadCoswo asoad as outt has ba** rD�. A of Dlviatoo $ of the Colitorwir Health and Safety Code. consist shell ro uLw in offest for am Vona ins dezo of iasuswro• OONTIC'T. TW" (OONSTflIlCf , gOMOTWXTION). To dig. Pstuits as be loaned subjest to any oa®dittcn or require- drive, bars, drill or deepen a Weil, or to rapartosate, ram"*. mast toured by �he serat" 0ffiesr to be hooe"a ry to &SOM p1LsA► revised, or *stood a well castes. the purpoaaa o this art Lela. �1vY DUT& CTIBM. The proper Cillina and dealing of a wall that is the A ppltwhit wAy belt br detderror thees conditions +saomoutdod bib* pgloader useful of as to samara that the around wren is work Would roeult &A a 1Le auLada" or Cho rstit tooWn PsroeaucCod and to ellsntaa¢s A ptattaetial physical hazard. boo violated the Lena Of tits vomit at this anLelo. 11.MMLf,CAL CWWJEIDINO VSI.L. Any artittclol excavation to access of SO Meet canatructp�!f by spy trsthad fag the purpose of establish- Sea. 45.0ld. CaawlesLost of 11or11. t:ad as electrical grdwwd. The parsitter shall wanly the Rorlth Oftlaar in wrLclwg L1l1ALTH OylixCt111. The Oseerilo Camwt7 tMoleb OttLasr or his designee. =.Ca"leocodwunttll ouch wlrittenn aowt Iteurisw pass Used rea.010 d. 1XVIVU)"L WitI$= WKU.. A weer well used to supply water for A (Last ltwpactLca of the work shall ba tAda by Uw lbealth d.wooatia weeds of an Lndividual residanee or comercial establish- Offtoer rod no parmittao shall be deeded to have coWliod tritb this article or his perish until sous* ,L000"tkal boa bsmnl partoteaf. 'ia1'oifs'(t`Itt1AL trdi.t.. A veto$ welt "" io "Ply oo ttaometry an sa . La�riividual basis. Seo. 45.031. Motiaoi Cowell Los or owwwl of IbesTsit. OHsrlgtpATUM VBLL. A U611 used for monitoring or saeplina Cho In the went a persit to da"od at towelled. the appticswt coadi[Land of & m*tar-bawrina aquifer, such ra rater pressure, or pQarstt holder shall be given written notice the Austell do,,4di one of o quality. Officer which notice shall squatty the romooss toe Ls 64CL*w and •hall notify the ap+yplicant se pa nit holder of his riaktt P IT. A written permit issued by the Health Ofttcer pemitctog to toque ae • hrarictg batore the Mall Usadoetu Advi6cry iktesd tica ewastructioa, recsnncructi ll, ds&trwrtton, or abandoraoent within can days, of a wall. Sob. 45.026. 11"Loat hibIta Noisome. Pam. A14y person, tins• corpar&etoo or govorustoot&1 4sancy. In the avant the Health Officer "Comings th"'i well WOLIC NUISANCE. The car® "public nulasnee", wit+n appltad eo 000atituteo A public Guidance be shall Reed a writtso nst.tas a welt, shall oaas anyy wall Which threatanr Ce t�petr the gtoitcy to the landowner and the porult holder, it sthsr Chan the load- wait,grQuOd water or otlstoias Jropardito the health or safety of owner. A copy of the aotios oball be posted wu the affected the public. Property. The Moore °ball atsto tlaa sprsmifte facto giving rise to ouch oulaanao; tha corrective smaomram doused necassary; and star, data, and pl"o at which a hearing shall be hold by gAI,T WATU (MYDHAULIC) URAIEA WLU. A well used for °xtr°ecinnt$of the Well Standards Advisory Uterd ratactng thereto, which date eta COW feed or icrjectirtg water into the underground as . me ano shall be act lore than ten nor wars, than thirty days ♦fear the prrvcntift the tncrv&ioe of salt water into a fresh water boarLng date ouch notice is mailod. The nottcs sha11 otats tint in aquifer. the event: the Hoard daterutuaa that a public ouisdnsa vatted TEST OR IMPLO"T"T YOLE. As, excavation used for decomining rho a spacial Aaoasseoat shall be lrmpooed wpasn the land tog Ray nature of usAvrUrouad coats of abatoopaot. g+aoiomlcol or hydroloIIical conditions, whother by asisaic lnvaotiaakiea, dtrtut observation or any other M«ras�. Sea. I5.029. laasadiata Abeceseat. WSl•L. Any artificial excavation constructed by any wethod for If clop Health Officer finds tint: irmalt.tu ; too purpose of attracting water from or injecting water into the uudarSrwund far providing cathodic protsetion or alaetcleal necessary to prevent impatraont of the ground Mato: as a threat groundi,apt °� uauLpmertL, for rtektrg teare or observations of to the health or safety of the ppuublta, ho tar abate the csatsamce wnderaround aondittona or for any other similar purpose. Walla without gtvttig notice. Within (wantq-tour (34) hours after shall include, but shall not be ILadiced to, conaatnity water inittattnn&� ouch abatsmenc, the itcalth Officer shallivo oacice Aupplq walla, individual dt"satte walls, Industrial wells, of a hearing botoro the wall Staoda"s Advisory Soda to the agrLcultural wells, cathodic protection walls, electrical enamor proscribed is Station WOW protwWL a wells, teat end exploratory holes, observation walla and male water (hydraulic) berrior wells• as defined herein, and other wells wh000 regulation is necessary to fulfill the sec. 45.0210. Hoard tlasriag- tvurpooa of this article ds decaamin+d by the Wait 5candardo Advisory board. Wells shall not include: (a) oil and gaa wells, At the time fixed for the hearing, rho wall Standards ggeothsrssl walla or other Gallo constructed under the jurLo• Advisory Board *hall hear and consider All relevant teatissony diction of Cho State papartrsent at Conservation, except those aid evidence offered by tit° vent tL. , ardd by any ocher wells converted to use to water wells; (b) well• used for the nuisance exists,person. In the went the Board finds chat o rubles pu nse of devaterl any necr ar is atoll protect the r+nith water or to take ns or eart a during a; orr(ctloc• or any necessary action to protect the ground water or the health sea a eelrra hillsides or earth aaabenkmenu; or (c) ocher wails mhwa+ regulation is not rears+teary to fulfill the purpose of •red *afrCy or CM public, aslant the atttaation to corracCad by this article ♦s determined P r'A the landowner on or before a date to b+ aprcifiad by the Boara Board. . by the We11 Standards Advisory The costs of such corrective work by cha diealth Officer hall became r spacial rsomoeuant upon the i.and pursuant to 8accloa 4S.0111 I i If the board (>ads that a permit Was improperly denied or cancelled it shall order tM Health Officer to igeve or beipatstslauch permit. 5 Sao. 45.0211. Abatement Costs a Special A48414sRtet. 1ppop s itadtog by the (Jell 8tandrrds Aevlsory board tlsst a:wll constituts a public nuisance, all cost of abatement cerriod out under Cho terms of this section bh}ll constitute r obisr�e and special assessment upon the parcel of land involved k, i;r It suck costs are not paid within sixty (40) days, thay shall tINND be declared a special aaseawant against that parcel as provided irbq)pverreaorlt Coda Section 2544S. Such special agaostaemt shall ' be collected at the rams ttwo and in the same manner sa ordinary k .s County taxes are collected and shall be subJact to the sass ? #).3" 1as and the same procedures and ula n ease of delinquency as prev ided for ordinary County taxes. The County shall retain .'•` ...,:+. the additional and independent right to recover its costs by "by of civil action against the owner and person to pcasesatoa ;r.:� • - sr "rot. jointly or severally. $#a. 45 0211. Standards, T Standards for the construction, reconstruction, destruction, 1 or ebaodotment of walla shall be the standards recommended in the State Departnant of Water Resources bulletin no. 14. Cimptes' I1 sad A"ondices f, P and G. and future &smendmcsts thereto, r r UR,Eil such ties" a standards for cathodic protactioa walls and electrical grounding walls are recommended by the Department of !dater Sesoorces, such wells shall conform cc the l Tentative pomp Altoda 0taftdarda " Shoots A-497-9-1 and A-497-8-2, revised Spaaslber 10, 1969, Gf the Southern California Cathodic PTotactia# t •;la Cartllltt". Moil standards may be suzdifiad by the Nsalth Officer. ' with the advice and cumurrenc• of the Wall Standards Adviaory Board, ubGre required to cope with local goologlcal and Around '1 ' water conditions. ; • S+feo. 10.0217. pwwlty. 't '„�.' Any person who violscea the terms of this article or any peewit issued hereunder &hall be guilty of a misdemeanor, pusitolwblo by a fine not ex:cooding five M,ndrod Dollars MOO or by imprisonment not excoodirw six (d) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such parson shall be daamsd gguuiltyy of 4 separate offense for each and ovary day Or portion themes! during which any such violation is committed, coatinuod or permitted and shall be subject to the a— puntshnAU as for the ArLSiswl offense. #JC'TIOA'2. Ordinance no. Isis is repealed. sgCTIOU ), This Ordinance shall take affect and be to Lull force thirtyy 00) drys from sad after its passage, and beforo'the expiration' of fittcan 11%) days after the passage thereof shall be publlabod once to the San Cieaaanto Sun-Post, a newspaper published in the County of ;•;Y>`_` Or a, Etato of California, together with the names of the odadws of Lbw [Ward of Oupervisors voting for and against the Geese, y; a'l� bras or Eta ar o upery a1 s (SLAW of Orange County, California ATTRaT. t. ,..'. NILLIAN t. aT JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Of Orange County, California by Is AV Y �F.. STATE Of CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) _ .•`tits..; • •, .•..•:i,.I, WILLIAM E. aT JONN, County Clark and ex-ot[1c10 Clerk of the board of Supervisors, do hereby certify that at a regular msetinyy� o! the Board of Suparvisor• of orange County, California, hold on tAe 1Bth day _ ;•'' of July, 1g72, the foregoing Ordinance containing three (I) &aCEOAe was passed and adopted by the following.vota, 4 AYES. SUPERVISORS UAVID L. hAKhH, WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS, R.W. BAP?,1M, RALPH B. CLARK AND RONALD W. CASPRU - NObar SUPERVISORS NONE AaSEArrr ,SUPERVISOxS NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto tot my hand and atfixed the official Baal of the Board of supervisor of the County of Orange, State Of California, this Lqjjj day of July, 1972i .. WILLIAM B. ST JONN, County Clark and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ' of Orong0 County, C41110rnia by lBaAL) . Publish San Clemente Sun-Poet July 27. 1472 i Y Chapter 14 . 26 CONSTRUCTION AND ABA?y'DONIPI= JT Or bJAT ,R i;L T.7 S Sections : 14 . 26 . 010 Adoption of county regulat _ons . 14 . 26. 020 Requirements augment existing regulations . 14 . 26. 030 Designation of advisor,- board . 14 . 26. 040 Adaptation of designations . 14 . 26 . 050 Permit fee schedule . 14 . 26 . 010 Adoption of count•:- -e ulatj or!s R>:cep`co as herein otherwise provided, that certail: doc :-r,er ',, en t t . ed Ordinance No . 2607 of the count, of Orange re n" to co,-:_ c t:ion and abandonment of , e1I s as Cc)j L, pi ed aI d adC," tfu ?i "le county of Orange , three ( 3 ) co,.,--'Les of ;' c;, .-,�=ye 1_e en fi 1.ed with the city clerk Of the cit-\7 Of 1Ii'i_. ;'!r't03 a fc?' USe a examination by the- public , is adopted and er.ac .ed as Life ,Jel Construction and Abandonment Ordinance of the CitY Of' -Untie Q Beach as fully as though the same were set forth herein , and � for the purposes stated therein. (Ord . 1919, 5/74 ) 14 . 26 . 020 Requirements augment e);-! sIL,.J-nF, regulations . T: requirements of this chapter shall be in addit-_on to any other requirements of the city of Hunting'.on Beach, and before a permit is issued by the city , satisfactor - ��r•oof of compliance f with all provisions relating thereto must be presented to th director of public works . (Ord . 1919, 5/7; ) 14 . 26 . 030 Designation of advisory board . The Orange County Well Standards Advisory Board , established by Orange County Ordinance No . 2607 dated July 18, 1972 , is designai.ed as the Well Standards Advisory board of the city of -:un�.ing Beach . (Ord . 1919 , 5/74 ) g� 14 . 26 . 040 Adaptation of designations . (a ) Any reference to "unincorporated territory" in aid Orange County Ordinance No . 2607 shall mean "territo - within the boundaries of the city . " , ,(b ) Reference to Government Code Sectio 4 in Orange County Ordinance No . 2 07 shall mean Section '2 773 • of the Government Code , the appr priate section applicable to cities . (Ord . 1919 , 5/74 ) 14 . 26 . 050 Permit fee schedule . The city council shall adopt , by resolution , an appropriate permit fee sAedule for Construction , reconstruction and abatement Of abar5doned we11s . (Ord . � 919 , 5/74 ) - ( The next page is 416 ) 411 1 A G R E E M E N T 2 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 19741 3 which date is enumerated for purposes of reference only, by and between the 4 COUNTY OF ORANGE, hereafter "COUNTY', and the CITY OF , 5 hereafter "CITY:" 6 WITNESSETH: 7 WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have previously entered into an Agreement dated 8 , 19 , whereby the County Health Officer -acts as the 9 Health Officer for CITY; and 10 WHEREAS, CITY has adopted an ordinance relating to the construction and i 11 abandormen of wells which is similar to Ordinance No. 2607 of COUNTY, requiring, !� _ I 12 among other things, a permit for the construction, reconstruction, or'abandonment 13 of any well; I 14 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 15 1. CITY shall adopt and maintain during the tern of this Agreement a 16 permit fee schedule pursuant to the above CITY ordinance, said fees shall 17 be collected and retained by COUNTY to cover its costs of enforcing said 18 ordinance. All permit fees established by said fee schedule shall be 19 identical to the corresponding permit fees established by COUNTY in effect 20 at the time a CITY permit is issued. 21 2, It is understood that COUNTY shall not be responsible for the performance i 22 of any abatement work required under the above ordinance. Such work, if not 23 performed by the well owner, shall be performed by CITY either through its 24 employees or by a contractor hired by CITY, at the request of the Health Officer. 25 The costs of such work shall be recovered by the CITY from the well owner. ILK) The Health Officer shall be responsible solely for the inspection of such 27 work to determine compliance with such ordinance. 28 3. The Agreement dated , 19i, shall continue in 29 full force and effect, and shall be applicable to the enforcement of the �0 above-mentioned CITY ordinance, except insofar as it may be inconsistent 31 herewith. 32 1 . 2 _ 4. This .Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated by either 3 y 4 party on 120 days' written notice. In the event of termination, the County Health Officer shall have no obligation to enforce any CITY ordinance relating 5 6 to the construction, reconstruction or abandonment of wells. 7 DATED: , 1974. COUNTY OF ORANGE 8 ATTEST: WILLIAM E. ST JOHN BY County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Chairman of its Board of Supervisors of the Board of Supervisors of to Orange County, California By 11 Deputy 12 DATED: , 1974. CITY OF 13 ATTEST: 14 BY Mayor 15 16 City Clerk 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 18 ADRIAN DUMPER, COUNTY COUNSEL 19 By l � 20 Deputy 21 22 23 24 25 26- 27 28 29 30 31 32 t ` 1 1 A G R E E M E N T 2 3 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 4 1974, which date is- enumerated for purposes of reference only, by and 5� between the COUNTY OF ORANGE, hereafter "COUNTY, " and the CITY OF g , hereafter "CITY; " 7 WITNESS ETH: g WHEREAS , COUNTY and CITY have previously entered into an Agreement 9 dated , 19 whereby the County Health Officer acts 10 as the Health Officer for CITY; -and 11 WHEREAS, CITY has adopted an ordinance relating to the construction 12 and abandonment of wells which is similar to Ordinance No. 2607 of 13 COUNTY, requiring, among other things, a permit for the construction, 14 reconstruction, or abandonment of any well ; J zr15 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows : .67 a 16 1. In the event CITY adopts a permit fee schedule pursuant to i F o pz ao171 the above CITY ordinance, said fees shall be collected and retained by Ll 18 COUNTY to cover its costs .of enforcing said ordinance. In the event 19 CITY fails to adopt such a fee schedule, or any permit fee established i 20 by said fee schedule is less than, the corresponding permit fee 21 established by COUNTY in effect at the time a CITY permit is issued , 22 CITY agrees to pay to COUNTY the difference between said CITY and 23 COUNTY fees with regard to each CITY permit issued by the Health 24 Officer pursuant to said CITY ordinance. . COUNTY shall bill CITY 25 quarterly in arrears for any such sums due. 26 2. It is understood that COUNTY shall not be responsible for 271 the performance of any abatement work required under the above ordinance 28 Such work shall be performed by CITY, either through its employees or 29 by a contractor hired by CITY, at the request of the Health Officer. 30 The Health Officer shall be responsible solely for the inspection of 31 such '.ork to determine compliance with such ordinance. 32 / VTH:cni 1/29/74 1. 1 3. CITY agrees to reimburse COUNTY in full for any costs 2 incurred by COUNTY in the abatement of any nuisance pursuant to said 3 CITY ordinance. Said payment shall be made to COUNTY upon demand, 4 . .whether, or not such. costs­ are recovered by CITY from the property. owner. 5 . 4. The Agreement dated , 19 , shall continue in 6 full force and effect, and shall be 'applicable to the enforcement of 7 the above-mentioned CITY ordinance, except insofar as it may be i 81 inconsistent herewith. 9 5. This Agreement shall continue in effect until terminated by 10 either party on. 120• days ' written notice. In the event of termination, 11 the County Health Officer shall have no obligation to enforce the 12 CITY well ordinance. 13 DATED: , 1974. COUNTY OF ORANGE 14 ATTEST: WILLIAM E. ST JOHN By �zZ 15� County Cleric and ex-officio Clerk Chairman o its Boar o Supery sot. goo of the Board of Supervisors of °016 Orange County, California p►-z 60 17 18 By Deputy 19 20 DATED: 1974. CITY OF 21 ATTEST: 22 Mayor 23 iMy Clerk 24 25 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26 ADRIAN KUYPER, COUNTY COUNSEL 27 By, _ 28 Deputy f 29 (`f 30 31 1 C' '' y•.1�� 32 1/29/7 , VTB:cm 2.