Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 Zone Changes - Zone Change 86-2 - Conditional Use PermiJEROME M. BAME ATTORNEY AT LAW 2130 MAIN STREET, SUITE 140 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 960-4329 October 17, Mayor Robert P. Mandic, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem Ruth Finley Councilwoman Ruth S. Bailey Councilman Peter Green Councilman Jack Kelly -----Councilman Don MacAllister Councilman John Thomas HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A 10 Z ��Yo L0UYnCLwu, U1 2 d `-6. VV e. B f 1 Nti YV rfp�,pL44T5 (ffAr'E*,19lZ1S65 8V,g r2 2J6,S 6_ i° _15T,4Fr 1986 A-V e(U\J NSZ Re: Agenda Item No. D-lb, October 20, 1986 City Council Meeting ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 Appeal of Planning Commission Denial Applicant: SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES Dear Honorable Councilpersons: The Applicant (SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES) is appealing the Planning Commission denial of its Zone Change request. The request is for a change of zone from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 !Medium High Density Residential). The Subject Property The subject property is located at 17712 & 17762 Cameron Street, which is on the Northeast corner of Cameron Street and Newman Ave- nue. The subject property fronts Cameron Street, not Newman Avenue, with a Cameron Street address. This site is depicted on Exhibit "A," attached. The subject property consists of two lots totaling .54 acres, which would yield a total -of 13 units as R3 (Medium High Density Residen- tial). Staff was of the opinion that the size of the parcel is ade- quate to accommodate 13 units (Page 3 of August 5, 1986 Staff Report). No General Plan Amendment is required for the zoning and development of the .54 acre site as R3 (Page 3 of August 5, 1986 Staff Report). Area Is In Transition The two lots comprising this subject property are old remnants that • Huntington Beach City Council October 17, 1986 Page 2 should be improved and made compatible with 950 of the block, which consists of multiple residential dwellings. The surrounding land uses are: To the North: R3 (Medium High Density Residential) To the East: Immediate Adjacent Building to the East is R5 (Office Professional), but the second and subsequent buildings Eastward are R3 (Medium High Density Residential). To the South: High Density Residential To the West (Beach Blvd.): General Commercial These land uses are depicted on Exhibit "B," attached. This past April, 1986, the Planning Commission (and City Council) approved a similar zone change from R5 to R3 of the property two lots to the East of the subject property, at 8111 Newman Avenue (Zone Change No. 86-5). About a year before that, the parcel three lots to the East on Newman Avenue was similarly changed from R5 to R3, and now consists of approximately 50 apartment units. Applicant's subject property, as it presently exists, contains two very old single family dwelling units. The property is unsightly and hazardous. There exists no curbs and gutters. Neighboring resi- dents, as well as pedestrians walking to the Humana Hospital across the street, must walk in the street to circumvent the subject proper- ty. This creates an extremely hazardous condition, especially on foggy and/or rainy days. The Owners SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES (the "Applicant") is a partnership consisting of four medical doctors, all of whom (with the exception of one who is now deceased) live in Huntington Beach and have their offices in the Humana Hospital (formerly Huntington Intercommunity Hospital) across the street from the subject property which they own. These owners purchased the subject property in 1969 (17 years ago), and themselves changed the zone from one that would accommodate resi- dential buildings to R5 (Office Professional) with the intention, at that time, that they themselves, would build a medical office building on the subject property and occupy it themselves. However, for various reasons, as time passed, they did not do so. In 1969, when they changed the zone to its present R5, there were only a few medical office buildings in the vicinity (one on the grounds of Hunt- ington Intercommunity Hospital, two on Beach Blvd.). Today, however, there are at least 15 separate medical office buildings within a one block radius of the subject property. This includes the very large 0 • Huntington Beach City Council October 17, 1986 Page 3 Medical Tower Building on the Humana Hospital grounds, as well as the brand new 54,000 sq. ft. Humana Hospital Medical Building current- ly under construction directly across the street from the subject property. With this over saturation of medical buildings in the immediate area, particularly the new, modern medical buildings and facilities on the Humana Hospital campus, the Applicants find it not to their advantage to build and occupy the subject property as a Medical Building, and also have determined that it would be impractical and uneconomical for them to attempt to compete, as Landlords, with the numerous other medical facilities now in the area. However, Applicants should upgrade the unsightliness of the subject property by improving it. They have determined that although no market exists for additional Professional Office Buildings in the area, this subject property would be desirable and valuable to the community if improved as R3 residential. Staff's Initial (August 5, 1986) Report Staff's initial Staff Report, dated August 5, 1986, a copy of which is marked Exhibit "C" and attached, recommended approval of Applicant's requested zone change from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). Staff's grounds for approval were: 1. "A General Plan Amendment is not required." 2. "Medium High Density Residential (R3) of the site will be compatible with the surrounding land uses." 3. "Approval of Zone Change 86-20 will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood." What the Professionals Sa The letters of PHIL TYMON (Exhibit "D" attached), a member of the Huntington Beach -Fountain Valley Board of Realtors specializing in land, and JOHN R. HARTMAN (Exhibit "E" attached), who has been active in the local real estate area for the past 10 years with expertise in income, commercial and investment real estate, are typical of what professionals conclude regarding the preferred use and value of the subject property. These experts conclude that the 15 separate Medical Office Buildings within a one block radius of the subject property have over saturated the office professional/medical building market. This is now partic- Huntington Beach City Council October 17, 1986 Page 4 ularly true with the current construction of the very large new Humana Medical Building directly across the street from the subject site. The best evidence of this is the fact that the owners of the property themselves, who rezoned the property to its present R5 have deter- mined that it is not feasible to improve this as a professional build- ing, either with or without them occupying it themselves. When I, myself, walked the entire four corners of the block these past several weeks, the only "For Rent" sign I saw was on the R5/Office Professional building on Newman Avenue immediately next to the subject property. I did not see a single "For Rent" sign on any of the resi- dential units in the surrounding area. In Conclusion An R3 (Medium High Density Residential) development would be compati- ble with 95% of the surrounding area (see Exhibit "B" attached), where- as an R5 (Office Professional) development would be incompatible with 95% of the surrounding area on this block. It is time that the subject property be improved. It is obvious that the current condition of the subject property begs for improve- ment. The owners will not improve this property as it is currently zoned R5 (Office Professional), because it makes no sense for them to do so. Although the entire Newman Avenue frontage on this block was once R5 (Office Professional), one -by -one the lots have been rezoned and improved as R3 (Medium High Density Residential). This subject proper- ty, which faces Cameron Street, should logically be similarly improved as multiple residential, just like 95% of the other areas in this block. For that reason, Applicants respectfully urge the City Council to overturn the Planning Commission's denial and approve Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-3.4. Most respectfully, M.. B- AMEE for Applicants JMB:mgw Attachments .1 1 V • 23 Q I 14 •� .. ; 22 30 # . I 8r/ •• / 1r • e4R 1 , 21 a N/0r IS W. 439 `• O. 2/3 i NO. 43. z se • ...,• i " .fy NO. 4682 ,rrr.• . s' •• �. .rr,r .rr,. r r r '•* VAN BURN J —"'� STREET TRACT ��• • • .. Jl II � O � ;l O ' ea �� ,.• f` • n O ./ G 30 + TRACT v 'J a • Y • .. 4 3 ,r r' V er /i /! or. 4 1(7 i e 1 �r, • , III .r r.er OV �r.re reev ? �r�r• w 21 22 23 3 24 +� 25 26 27 2B O ; O 0 I I 14 s 19 NO 6073 .? ]. 6 er �e K• // /4 Iur �.� r..e /9 "63, // /0 9 1 F 7 6 J I ! ; 94 .rr er ! v 7 rr ,r e.e /O /J rr se >f • a TRACT .t ~ in.• •r' 1 •' +• .. re • .rn • J+ ` r ia> t" �•S. �! i - WAS -- : - r�R Oi .rV :a� � {� / `' i' `♦ " 34 r� nrrcc :rf' r_r'T PJ°PJi: S f s.f: — re. ��i : �� ♦ o i _r -a t1 C'VtRAI TEqu • N 9) 16 WI rg ♦.7 ♦ i!. 4C .: •.':li 1'•Ir.: - N 'IF r• O I I ! IJti'1'I :...�1!!.'•r + ANY LIA. --- -•--'— - -- IE ?Eb i/0. 4328 If, .a P-ers+ B 9 • : t - /7 .rs JIJTY ASESi J0 h�J ~ /I /3 /6 j /7 /B /9 zo its is' TRACT W Q i 20 f' D71 1 O �:O O O \J^ 9 1011OO22•21 I n � i � 1 I I 4 rs I �IAS .re' '� a4" CAMERON — STR - T n e •re ! •r s5 4 .re' $ .. 6 .re 7 r.•s• srs• B P /2, 1 i+ 1 9;10 i•, s ,e• I of I` F71 � O :'wO5 n I R S. 91 - 9 1 kJ t O O •` O � J w w V 472 a O O 10 11 0$ 12 I s. t Is, w 14 r, 0 7 Is O 1 •; NO. 405 er .d rr se' �• •� / •err .ren.. irool• •e:r• sni• ,•rs• .rF• ress• s„e •e' I ! ,t I �'•• .•v• Inen• BEACH / J/UNT/;vcroN BEACH B/ vp J BOULEVARD GY VA 3 Q •r na rRAC r 4, J W v 21 L 14 T . r: r /. NO 430 s 1 q. r• an rr VAN BUREN 22 21 �,I ff"u r %6) n44 . NO 439 srREEr e rnus•nner crRFFr — BEACH am • n ,lfZo F� r, 0 k N ~ N M av 4-1 O f4 lj 41 U W 4J �1 i! ✓: V O N 04 to V1 O 0Z U 'a a a4 a 4j 04 �. U O 'nv4j .A D U) Q 11 II II .c1v►� . V Q i � N i r wVwrrwcmw Ot4rw 01 �r / ROW CVARO ~ Ubl Vi1 �7 7N sTaff 27/_ - l_ huntington beach development services department EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 5, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE -CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 APPLICANT/ Specialists Enterprises OWNER: 7572 Alhambra Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUEST: To change the zoning from R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) LOCATION: 17712/17762 /ameron St. (northeast corner at Newman Avenu� ACREAGE: .54 acre If 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: DATE ACCEPTED: July 3, 1986 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE September 2, 1986 ZONE: R5 (Office ProYessional District) GENERAL PLAN: Office Professional EXISTING USE: Two single family dwellings Approve Zone Change No. 86-20 and Negative Declaration No. 86-34 and recommend adoption by the City Council. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: The applicant is requesting a change of zone from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). The subject site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street was originally zoned R2. A zone change was approved in 1969 to redesignate the property as R5. The Planning Commission and City Council approved a similar request in April of this year for another parcel along this segment of Newman Avenue. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: 7fZ-ice Professionai ZONE: _ ,fire Professional� LAND USE. i:a:-iiiy dwei1incs EXHIBIT • • North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: South of Subject Prooert GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: High Density Residential R3 (Medium High Density Residential) Apartments Office Professional R5 (Office Professional) Medical Office Building (across Newman Avenue) High Density Residential R5 (Office Professional) Hospital (across Cameron Street) General Commercial C4 (Highway Commercial) Office Building Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services will post draft Negative Declaration No. 86-34 for ten days. This review period will expire August 10, 1986. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-20, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-34. The City Council must take final action on the negative declaration prior to approving the zone change. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. J Staff Report - 8/5/86 -2- (5757d) 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: On April 1, 19�6, the Planning Commission approved Zone Change No. 86-5 (Roger Slates) at 8111_BE�vman Avenue. At that time, due to the size of the lot, staff recommended the zone designation R3-25 which restricted the site to four units rather than five units as would have been allowed with the R3 designation alone. This proper_y is separated from the subject pro erty by one lot containing a medical office ui ing. The subject site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street is over one-half acre and would yield a total of 13 units. Staff believes it is of adequate size to accommodate the number of units permitted. In addition, a designation of R3-25 would still permit 13 units on this site due to its size. For these reasons, staff is not recommending any other suffix or qualification for the site, but simply supports the applicant's request for R3. It should be noted, however, that the size of the lot could also adequately accommodate an R5, Office use, as per existing zoning. As this area is in transition, a map depicting existing land uses is attached to this report. The proposed zone change to Medium High Density Residential will result in zoning that is inconsistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Office Professional. However, since the site is less than one acre, state law and the City's general plan permit this inconsistency. No _general plan amendment is required for the zoning and development of the .54 acre site as R . 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: J Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-20 and Negative Declaration No. 86-34 and recommend adoption by the City Council with the following findings: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. A general plan amendment is not required for this project as State Law permits parcels of less than one (1) acre to have zoning that is inconsistent with the general plan. 2. Medium high density residential development of the site will be compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-20 will n e de ental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhoo . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map and surrounding land uses 2. Zoning map 3. Draft ordinance 4. Negative Declaration No. 86-34 JWP:JA:kla Staff Report - 8/5/86 -3- (5157d) r� u PHIL TYNON Specializing in Apartments, Shopping Center, Industrial & Land FIRST TEAM WALK-IN REALTY ❑ 6781 Warner Ave., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 848-8080 0 840-2207 Cctober 6th 1986 Specialist-nterprises, C/o Ceorge Feeney '%D. . 7572 Alhambra S greet "unti-nC-ton 'Beach Ca, 12647 Re, 17712 ;�: 17762 Cameron Street ::untington Beach Ca, 92j_S48 In respect to changing the zoning on the property located at 17712 '-- 17762 Cameron Street=Tuntingtor_ E-each California frori R-5 "Zonin-g, Professional Offices, "edical Use to P,-3 or p-4 Zoning "ulti Family Use, In my Professional opinion as a Realtor .-it'.: First Team ":'alk-In Realty and a member of the t'untingtor. _­eacl: Fountain Valley Eoard of Realtors, I sub, est v; ry strongly that, due to the vacancy factor on 1-5 Zoning in t-e City of Hu.ti::bton Beach area is between (25) to fifty (50) percent vacancy, ::°sere as a multi family use zoninb to be only three (7) percent vacancy factor for the same rem.. ianiinp you in ad-1 Phil' Tycoon First Team Vl'alk-I� " Realty 6781 .Varner Avenue 11untington Beach Ca, 92647 �y�!jRdT :�=ALMZLEE A RESIDENTIAL & INVESTMENT CO. JOHN R. HARTMAN October 13, 1986 Re: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 Specialists Enterprises -- Appeal to City Council 17712/17762 Cameron Street Northeast Corner of Cameron at Newman Avenue To Whom It May Concern: I, JOHN R. HARTMAN, am a licensed real estate agent, and am associated with STAR REAL ESTATE at 10061 Talbert, Suite 101, Fountain Valley, Cal- ifornia. I have been actively engaged in the local (Huntington Beach/Fountain Val- ley) real estate area, as a licensed real estate agent, for the past 10 years. My area of expertise and emphasis_is in the income, commercial and investment real estate area. I am well familiar with both the commercial, office professional, and residential real estate needs in the area of Huntington Beach, including the area in which Specialists Enterprises owns real property, that being 17712/17762 Cameron Street (Northeast Corner of Cameron at Newman Avenue). I know from personal knowledge and experience that the City of Huntington Beach currently has an over abundance of Office Professional buildings and space available. This is particularly true in the area of the sub- ject property (Cameron/Newman), due to the very large new Humana Hospital medical building currently being built directly across the street, in ad- dition to the existing Humana Medical Towers Building on the same Hospi- tal/Medical Building Campus. There are approximately fifteen (15) separate Medical Office Buildings within a one (1) block area of the subject property. In addition, the major Pacifica Hospital Medical Complex, as well as numerous other Office Professional Medical Buildings elsewhere in Huntington Beach, more than adequately meet the demand for Medical Professional Office Buildings in Huntington Beach. Further, the very major Fountain Valley Medical Center and Trauma Center, with its substantial Medical Office Buildings, must be included when considering Office Professional Medical needs. EXHIBIT--Z 10061 talbert_ suite 101. fountain vnllPv rn 9?70R (714) 754-A?A? A RESIDENTIAL & INVESTMENT CO. JOHN R. HARTMAN October 13, 1986 Page 2 In essence, there is adequate, if not an over abundance, of medical rent- al space available in the area of Huntington Beach. Conversely, there is a dire need for residential rental units in the Hunt- ington Beach area. There are over 121 residential rental units located on the East side of Cameron, with but a single rental sign showing (as of October 10, 1986). Also, there are 50 new rental units located on Newman that are fully rented. Also, there is not a single "For Rent" sign at the over 98 rental units along VanBuren Street, one block from the sub- ject property (as of October 10, 1986). This clearly demonstrates the need for additional residential rental units in the vicinity of the sub- ject property and, as such, it is my professional opinion that R3 (Medi- um High Density Residential) is the best use for the subject property, not only for its owners, but also for the City of Huntington Beach. In fact, I believe that if the subject property were to be built as pres- ently zoned, R5 (Office Professional), it would be difficult for an Office Professional Building of this size to compete with the brand new Humana Hospital Medical Building directly across the street, as well as the fif- teen other Medical Buildings within a 1-block area. Conversely, if this subject property were to be built as R3 (Medium High Density Residential), it would satisfy the needs of the new medical support staff (nurses, aides, etc.) that will be employed by the new Hospital Medical Building directly across the street. Accordingly, in my professional real estate opinion, I could not advise the subject property's owners to improve their subject property as R5 (Office Professional). The subject property, in its current state, has no sidewalks or curbs. This forces the Hospital patients and employees, as well as anyone else walking across the subject property, to walk in the street, which is particularly hazardous during fog or rain. In conclusion, it would be in the best interest of both the City of Hunt- ington Beach, as well as the subject property's Owners, to improve the subject property as R3 (Medium High Density Residential), but not as R5 (Office Professional). There is a desperate need in Huntington Beach, and particularly in the area of the subject property, for residential rental units, but not for additional office professional buildings. ✓JOHN R. HARTMAN Real Estate Agent 10061 tnlbert suite 1n1 fnuntnin vnllPv r^n Q'MA (71d) 7.rd-h969 G i�o�/=:fin aL R :Z A RESIDENTIAL 3 INVESTMENT CO. JOHN R. HARTMAN L SUPPLEMENT 0 October 13, 1986 Page 3 The new Humana Hospital medical tower, currently under construction, will have a total of approximately 54,000 sq. ft., 49,000 sq. ft. of which will be available for R5 (Office Professional) rental use. The now existing medical tower has a total of approximately 75,000 sq. ft., of which approximately 72,000 sq. ft. will be available for R5 rental use. As of October 13, 1986, this makes a total of 121,000+ sq. ft. of R5 rental space available. Upon completion of the new medical tower build- ing, there will be an excess of 30,000 sq. ft. of R5 rental space still available. The above -indicated figures show, in my opinion, that there is no need for further construction of R5 (Office Professional) rental units in this area. n At,1n0r,,00 to-Pybltsn Advertisements of all kinds Including public nolicas .by (� \Gres of the Superior Court of Orange County, Californt� Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961. and A-24831, dated 11 June. 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Public Notice Adverlls-nq covered by this affidovn is sat in 7 point .nth l0 pica column width I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and -published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME 4�tJil?§LI'C9{ t0 wit the issue(s) of September 29 198 6 198 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 29 198 6 a Mesa, Calq ornia. Signature AP ' .CITY cL�RK„` PUBLIC NOTICE it NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY "PUBLIC NOTICE GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold 'zone designation from R2 a public hearing in the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- I (permitting one unit per ington Beach Civic Center, 12,000 square feet of lot area) `.to R2-15 (permitting fifteen 2000 Main Street, Hunt-, 'units per gross acre). This ington Beach, Calfornia, on Izone change is being pro - the date and at the timee ,cessed as a result of the indicated below to receive widening of Heil Avenue and consider the statements! which has taken 25 feet from of all persons who wish to be I heard relative to the appli- the rear of many of these The intent is to increase cation described below. slots. 'the density such that the DATE: Monday, October 'identical number of units are 13, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. permitted to be constructed APPLICATION NUMBER: as would have been prior to the additional dedication for Zone Change No. Heil Avenue. 86-22/Negative Declaration il N V'I N M E N T A L ,No.86-39 APPLICANT: City of Hunt- STATUS: Negative Declar- ation No. 86-39 has been ington Beach LOCATION: North of Heil submitted to assess the an - vironmental effects of the re- lAvenue, south of Alhambra ''quest. between Silver Lane ON FILE: A legal descrip- lDrive, and Beach Boulevard Ition and a copy of the ZONE: R2, Medium Densi- 'proposal is on file In the De- jty Residential Ivelopment Services Depart - PROPOSAL: , To change ment. ALL INTERESTED PER - :SONS are invited to attend lsaid hearing and expIress opinions or submit evidence Ifor or against the application +as outlined above. All appli- (cations, exhibits, , and de- Iscriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of ;the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. 47 73 W, Ni •: HUNTINGTON BEACH TY COUNCIL, By: Alicia Wentworth, City Clerk, tone:(714) 536-5405 Published Orange Coast lily Pilot September 29, 86 M310 I,V REQUES , FOR CITY COUNCIACTION Date October 13, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrat r Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services 0 Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 6-39 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Consistent with Council Policy? j< Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zone Change No. 86-22 is being processed by the City to ensure that a like number of units can be constructed on each lot after additional dedication for the widening of Heil Avenue west of Beach Blvd. The zone change is deemed necessary due to the large additional right-of-way dedication required by code of twenty-five feet. Seventeen lots are included in this request; the lot at the corner of Silver Lane and Heil Avenue is not a part of the zone change. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of Zone Change No. 86-22 and Negative Declaration No. 86-39 based on findings and conditions of approval. Planning Commission action on August 26, 1986: ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39 AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed zone designation of R2-15 (15 units per gross acre) is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential which is also a maximum of 15 units per gross acre. PIO 4/84 2. Medium Density Residential development is compatible with the surrounding land uses. No change in density from that which had been planned for the area will result from the proposed zone change to R2-15. 3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-22 will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. ANALYSIS: Staff has studied a variety of ways to accomplish a change in density for the lots in question. The method in the code to establish a density standard different than what is set forth in the base district is by adding a suffix specifying number of units per gross acre. Analysis has shown that an appropriate number (i.e. 15 units per gross acre) can be applied across the board and accomplish the desired result. In arriving at an appropriate number of units per gross acre, the lot at the corner of Silver Lane, Heil Avenue, and Alhambra Street was creating a problem since its gross calculation would include such a great amount of surrounding right-of-way and would allow it a much greater number of units than other larger -sized lots on the block and greater than that which is currently permitted. For this reason, this corner lot was excluded from the zone change. This lot is presently developed with a single family home; existing zoning would permit two units on the site. An attached exhibit shows the area and the number of units allowed by the present R2 standards without the additional dedication as well as the number of units allowed with the proposed R2-15 designation after the additional twenty-five feet of dedication. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-39 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on the zone change it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-39. FUNDING SOURCE• Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Direct staff to initiate general plan amendment to Medium High Density Residential and zone change to R3 designation. 2. Deny Zone Change No. 86-22. RCA - 10/13/86 -2- (6301d) • • ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit showing densities permitted 2. Ordinance 3. Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes dated August 26, 1986 4. Zoning Map 5. Negative Declaration No. 86-39 JWP:JA:k1a RCA - 10/13/86 -3- (6301d) sraff TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: huntington beach development services department EPOR Planning Commission Development Services August 19, 1986 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39 (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 5, 1986) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: To change zone from R2 to R2-15 (15 units per gross acre) LOCATION: North of Heil Avenue. south of Alhambra Dr., between Silver Lane and Beach Blvd. ACREAGE: 4.3+ Gross Acres 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: ZONE: R2, Medium Density Residential GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density EXISTING USE: Residential Dwelling units Approve Zone Change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 86-39 Subject to the findings as outlined in Section 10.0 of this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This item was continued from the meeting of August 5, 1986 to allow staff to arrive at the best approach for solving a problem concerning the density calculations for a specific area of the community. This zone change is being processed by the City to ensure that a like number of units can be constructed on each lot after additional dedication for the widening of Heil Avenue west of Beach Blvd. The zone change is deemed necessary due to the large additional right-of-way dedication required by the Public Works Department. The additional area will be twenty-five feet off existing lots that are presently 120 feet in length. Seventeen lots are included in this request; the lot at the corner of Silver Lane and Heil Avenue is not a part of the zone change. m u C__7 A -F M-23A • • 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: North of Subject Propert GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Medium Density Residential R2 Single family homes and multi -family units Medium Density Residential R2 Multi -family units General Commercial C4 Commercial/Auto service Low Density Residential R1 Single family homes Medium Density Residential R2 Single family home Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-39 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the protect, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on the zone change it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-39. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -2- (5892d) T.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Staff has studied a variety of ways to accomplish a change in density for the lots in question. At the meeting of August 5, 1986, staff indicated that the "Q" (qualified classification) had been determined to be the best approach. Since that time, however, further analysis has shown that an appropriate number (i.e. 15 units per gross acre) can be applied across the board and accomplish the desired result. In addition, staff wanted to avoid the use of the "Q" zoning for the purpose of setting density standards. This has not previously been done and is not the true intent of the qualified classification. The method in the code to establish a density standard different than what is set forth in the base district is by adding a suffix specifying number of units per gross acre. In arriving at an appropriate number of units per gross acre, the lot at the corner of Silver Lane, Heil Avenue, and Alhambra Street was creating a problem since its gross calculation would include such a great amount of surrounding right-of-way and would allow it a much greater number of units than other larger -sized lots on the block and greater than that which is currently permitted. For this reason, this corner lot was excluded- from the zone change request. This lot is presently developed with a single family home; existing zoning would permit two units on the site. An attached exhibit shows the area and the number of units allowed by the present R2 standards without the additional dedication as well as the number of units allowed with the proposed R2-15 designation after the additional twenty-five feet of dedication. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve zone change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 86-39 and recommend adoption by the City Council with the following findings. Findings for Approval: 1. The proposed zone designation of R2-15 (15 units per gross acre) is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential which is also a maximum of 15 units per gross acre. 2. Medium Density Residential development is compatible with the surrounding land uses. No change in density from that which had been planned for the area will result from the proposed zone change to R2-15. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -3- (5892d) • • 3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-22 will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Zoning Map 3. Exhibit showing densities permitted. 4. Negative Declaration No. 86-39 (J'A'AIP:JA: jr Staff Report - 8/19/86 -4- (5892d) -QA op'���� I i 3 R 3 R3 PARK . _—'' si SIARK P3 CF-R L— ii�po p{� R 3 �I C.4 rCoe a 2—— -�---- -- ------ I-FQ-� re _nc P�,r%gvmrt " - LN- I ._ 1 I RI CF-E h., R3 ANIIA LN RY JVL� WT L —Earn—.._-_ R2 R 1 M I MI Al RI RI M; RM aw( /t3J-'f R� - M ( V ,. R3 �R3-1 // GLENCOE OR / s RI R2 Ri �1 C RI RI oJR1 Lov RI u RI o� i_ RI RI RI RI RI W RI RI i RI RI R1 / C4INF OR IRI A / J'oR �Rl RI. DON I I R ZE U — R DRRI � � 'C2C4 io RI LAMA 3 4 O I T+I LLA FRI RIRI RI dr! OR RZ I _ in: R2 C4 RI RI RI RI RI RLj i i i(C4_._,._i. I_ LANCA3T[11___—__D1I� \. ARNITT DR i RI RI R. o c r c D cB-I iD ce'l R 3 �+ i ZC86-ft-ZZ HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION To act7 d6•L� F�m CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ► L%nW1WN MAC" . Jeff Abramowitz From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date July 11, 198' NO. Fs6_39 _ Applicant: City of Huntington Beach KAI )S 104,1 6)CA-.U4 W-XR- Renuest: To Change Zone From R2 to 112-t?=. Location: Heil Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Silver Lane. Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending .)VL`( rA, nap and no comments, the attached comments were received. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the City Council approve Negative Declaration No.86-39 nding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resuTting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, Diana Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner JRB/dc CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH IN IIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND 1. Applicant City of H.B. 2. Address 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 9 _ 3. Telephone - _ 4. Project Location Heil Avenue between Beach Blvd., and bilver Lane 5. Project Title/Description Request to change the zone from R2 to - # 6. Date July 11, 1986 --- '- -- 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No X Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No X 3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, police, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No X 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No X _ 5. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities, natural resources, human health? Yes Maybe No X 6. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). III. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached (XXXX) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No X 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No X 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No X 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No X V. DETERMINATION kxx)k Negative Declaration ( ) Negative Declaration *With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report DATE �%�l �� SIGNATURE 4v�_ a,/ • C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS C-7 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/ N: (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 5 ATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86--39 1986 ) Zone Change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 86-39 is a request to change the zone from R2 to R2-15 (15 units per gross acre). It was continued from the meeting of August 5, 1986 to allow staff to arrive at the best approach for solving a problem concerning the density calculations for a specific area of the community. This zone change is being processed by the City to ensure that a like number of units can be constructed on each lot after additional dedication for the widening of Heil Avenue west of Beach Blvd. The zone change is deemed necessary due to the large additional right-of-way dedication required by the Public Works Department. The additional area will be twenty-five feet off existing lots that are presently 120 feet in length. Seventeen lots are included in this request; the lot at the corner of Silver Lane and Heil Avenue is not a part of the zone change. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-39 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the protect, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on the zone change it is necessary for the Planning Commission tr review and act on. Negative Declaration No. 86-39. Staff's recommendation: Approve Zone Change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 86-39 based on findings. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There was no one present to speak for or against the zone change and the public hearing was closed. A brief discussion ensued regarding the dedications and density calculations in this area. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, PC Minutes - 8/26/86 -2- (6039d)_ FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed zone designation of R2-15 (15 units per gross acre) is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential which is also a maximum of 15 units per gross acre. 2. Medium Density Residential development is compatible with the surrounding land uses. No change in density from that which had been planned for the area will result from the proposed zone change to R2-15. 3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-22 will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. C-9 COND II)�JONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-30/NEGATIVE DECLARA":ION �0. 86-42 Conditional Us Permit No. 86-30 is a request by the appi ant to permit the temp rary storage of lumber on the property ated on the south side o Warner Avenue approximately 200 feet ast of Palmdale Avenue, ursuant to Section 9331.3 of the Or nance Code. Section 9331.3 per its temporary uses such as lumber torage, contractor's storag\si rds and mulching operations or an initial period of two yearsn approval of a_conditiona use permit by the Planning Commissionhe applicant without bene It of permit is presently using thea for the storage of lu er and plywood. Section 9331.3 also stat\ord temporary se may be approved by the Planning Commission ditional ar, with a maximum of three such one year extetime. aid temporary use shall also comply with other crement including parking, access and setbacks. Such tempshal also be subject to additional conditions anlop nt standards as may be required by the Planningon ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental egula ions in effect at this time, the Department of.Developmen Service posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-42 for n days, an no comments, either verbal or written were"received. The staff, i its initial study of the project, has recommende that a negative eclaration be issued Prior to any action o Conditional Use Per it No. 86-30, it is necessary for the P1 ning Commission to re iew and act on Negative Declaration No. 86- 2. Staff's recomme ation: Approve Conditional Use,,Permit No. 86-30 and Negative D claration No. 86-42 based on the findings and conditions o approval. PC Minutes - 8/26/86 -3- (6039d) • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/NF,GATIVE DECLARATION (R2 to R2-f HUNTINGTON e _ =C:.i DEVELOPMENT SErcr ufS 11- AUG 0 5 10pr, NO. 86-39 r t'. U. dox 19., HunN-,ton Beach, CA 4_.. NO-7r*T .3 HERE3Y 1­7'i7N that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Sheet, ?untincton Beach, California, on `_^? date and .at t.ie ti:,,e indicated below to receive and consider t.ne 3 :3.?ments of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. �A- = 'T ^'uesda,r, gust 5, 1986, 7.00 ?M AP2`_,=CAT_ 70N NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 36-39 =?" T_-ANT City or Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Heil Avenue, south of Alhambra Drive, between Silver Lane and Beach Boulevard Z01N7- R2, Medium Density Residential REQUEST: To change zone designation from R2 (aermitting one unit per 2,000 sq�ojfeet of lot area) to R2-i 99-/� (permitting unit5per F This zone chance is being processed as a result of the widening of Heir! Avenue which has taken 25 feet f_orl the rear of :nan_v of these lots. The intent is to increase the density such that the identical number of units aye permitted to be constructed as would have been _prior to the additional dedication for Heil Avenue. _Nyr Rf.1i�i��_NTAL STJT17Q `�ar' � i 'I= .�e;, submitted to assess the environmental effects of the request. 0`7 %T 7 7 A coov of the or000s? 2 zon. _:,a. 'e s on file in the D:^cr=?lent of Develoomenc Services, 2000 Main Street, untington Beach, California 92643, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to a -tend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the aoolication as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission ,�(565ld-4) 142-161-04 Sargent, George C 165322 Thames Lane Htint i ngton Beach, CA 92647 .. 142-162-01 Horner, Lucille B 7681 Danuse Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172--06 Larkin, Horace :1 7901 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA '9264-7_y 142-172-01 Schultz, Gerhard 13342- Cedar Street - . Westminster, CA 92683 i 142-162-02 142-17 17 °` Widlund, Harold ""'� Leonar Charles 7671 Danube Drive 16531 Elb Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington ach, CA 92647 142-171-05 1 Bolton, Th ema '- 16531 Loire Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-06 Guerrero, Gilbert 16521 Loire Cir. Huington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-07 Janovick, Timothy 16511. Loire Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-08 Klopp, Darrell 16501 Loire Circle a Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-09 Parsons, Robert 16502 Loire Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-10 Mahoney, Walter 16512 Loire Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 4 142-171-11 Jordan, William 16522 Loire Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647, f 142-171-18 Au, William C 4532 Dan i to Lane Yorba Linda, CA 92686 142-171-19 Justice, Kenneth 1§511 Elbe Circle Huignton Beach, CA 92647 142-171-20 McClelland, James B 16501 Elbe Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-21 Rei nhol tz, Jack 16502 Elbe Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-22 Davis, Robert 16512 Elbe Circle Hutn i gnton Beach, CA 92647 142-171-23 Horiuchi, Irene 16522 Elbe Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-24 McEwan, Bruce 7792 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172-02 Adams, Richard 7932 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172-03 Unemoto, Harry 7922 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172-04 Garten, Lawrence 7912 Rhine Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172-05 Talcott, Steven R 7902 Rhine Drive Huntington Eeach, CA 92647 142-172-06 Pearmain, Weil 7892 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 142-172-07 Chambers, Donald 7882 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-172-08 Allen, Raleigh 7872 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, -CA 92647 142-172-M Padilla, Guadaupe 7862 Rhine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-171-12 Fendrych, Charles 16532 Loire Circle 142-171-25 Whitting, Edward 7891 Rhine Drive u....s:.,..�.... 0-1, r'A CIA/. 142-173-01 Abel, Howard 4: Chrysler Realty Corp ' VP n ails /n iA .T a t_.�n A-. _ 7 142-283-13 Guarnierei, Michael 16412 -Mark Lane ' Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-283-14 McMahan, William C 16422 Mark Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-283-15 Sherwood, Robert 21995 Teresa Mission Viejo, CA 92692 142-283-16 Kleinbach, John A 16431 Silver Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-283-17 Garrido, Jose 7602 Juliette Low Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-283-18 Lydon, Martin 16411 Silver Lane Huntington Beach, CA 142-283-19 Wheeler, Otis 16391 Silver Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-285-15 Russey, Claude 7692 Alhambra Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-285-16 107-401-04 Muraco, Martine Sandhoff, Kurtis Ray 19259 Ludlow Street 12600 Brookhurst Street Northridge CA 91326 Suite 101 Garden Grove, CA 92640 -- _ 142-285-17 142-102-01 4 V I- McPhedran, John A West, Theodore 7712 Alhambra Drive 7752 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 -.Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 142-285-18 Sttorrer, Joseph , 7W3?,. lLa rah Drive9.lL ' 142-102!03 is Eisley, Jack 15271 Candlewood Westminster, CA 92683 ' t 142-102-04 / Callihan, Paul L -� P.O'�Box 2333 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 142-102-05 Coulter, Reba E 7792 Glencoe Huntingn Beach, Ca 92647 142-102-06 Erwin, Charles E. 7804 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-07 Erwin, Charles 13101 Rosalind Dr. Santa Ana, Cal. 92705 142-102-08 Dyer, Theresa 7844 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-09 Diaz, David Paul 7832 Glencoe Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-10 Yang, Shiou-Jin 8602 Palermo Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 142-102-11 i Haynes, Edna L 7852 Glencoe Ave '- Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-12 Thomas, JA 3102 Ruth Elaine Drive t. s r. tlosi Alamitos, CA. 90Z#Q3 : x 4. 142-102-13 StelIrecht, Robert 16591 Graham Pt IV ZQ41pj+Oh lfA J..— —4-- Fb_ Blatt, Ronald Allaback, F D _ 4021 Figaro Cir. • 7811 Alhambra Avenue Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, " CA 92647, 92649 142-102-15 Trickett, Derek 1672 New Hampshire Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 142-102-16 G P Building Enterprises 7266 Edinger Avenue Suite H Huntington Beach-,,_CA--92647 142-102-19 } ;W Jordan, Jeanne S. 18601 Newland St. Sp. 79 Huntington Beach, CA+92646 142- 2-20 Z C �6 - ,2< Jorda , Jeanne S.(. 142-102-26 Wilson, Dirk 7931 Alhambra Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-35 Lin, Ren-Yno 6942 Bridgewater Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-36 Milde, Chris 21521 Brookhurst Huntington Beach, CA 92646 142-102-38 Cowing, Virgil 7751 Alhambra Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-39 Heiz, Efroim 607 14th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 142-102-40 Vogel, Pamela 7761 Alhambra Dr. Apt 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-27 - -- --" - 142-t"02=41 - Krutxik, Dorris L Collins, William 4053 Larwin Ave. 16372 Phelps Lane Cypress, CA 90630 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 142-102-31 Wong, Albert 24802 Solano Ct. Laguna Hills, CA 92653 142-102-32 Jue, Bailey 20361 Windcave Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 142-102-33 Covey, Claude 7415 Madera Hesperia, CA 92345 142- 142-102-42 West, Fred 7891 Alhambra Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-43 Hall, Ronald 7871 Alhambra Avenue Hutnignton Beach, CA 92647 142-102-45 Bartlett, Kenneth 7861 Alhambra Dr. #3 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-102-46 Chang, Ching -Jove 18364 Mt. Stewart Cir. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Abel , Howard/ 640 Via Lido Nord Ne�ort Beach, CA 92663 142-10 48 Abel , ward 142-102-50 Kim, Hand ling 4951 Berton Circle La Palma, CA 90632 142-102-51 Lockhart, John 13332 Anawood Way Westminster, CA 92683 142-102-52 G P Building Enterprises 12 (. Iv E �i - or- A v 71- H 1 �unh-aca► C/1 142-102-53 Goodman, Helene 6932 Church Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 142-103-17 Brown, James William 312 12th Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 142-161-01 Olson, Dale 16502 Thames Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-161-02 Ditton, William 16512 Thames Lane Huntingtoni Beach., CA 92647 142-161-03 Bagwell, Clayton 16522 Thames Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-103-02 42-103-20 _ Treece, Mae Warra, Daniel B. 7752 E.' Alhambra Ave. 7882-B Alhambra Avenue Huntington Beach, CA, 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-103-04 > 142-103-21 Rogalski, Robert Wu, Chin -Chang 8691 Palos Verdes Avenue 7790 Alhambra Drive Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-103-05 142-103-22 Fredriksen, Erl ing Maung, Michael A 7802 Alhambra Ave. 260 Pau I an i Way #2703 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Honolulu, HI 96815 142-103-06 142-103=23-C" d 14 Bond, Robert W. Lambert, Dennis 7814 Alhambra Ave. 17478 HWY 550 South Hunt ingtoh, Beach, CA 92647 Montrose, CO 81401 142-103-07 142-103-25 Hopkins, Orville L. Smith,_ Jimmie L 7822 Alhambra Drive P.O. Box 5185 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Canyon Lake, CA 92381 142-103-08 142-103-26 Janecek, George MPkalonis, Clemence 18231 - Ivorycrest Lane 3920 E. Anaheim Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Long Beach, CA 90804 --- - --- ----------------- --- ---- 142-103-09 142-103-27 mcDonald, Richard Prill Richard F. 7842 A Alhambra Ave. #1 7742 Alhambra Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-103-12 Nguyen, Dung Tien 7912 Alhambra Ave. #1 V Huntington Beach, CA 92647 142-103-12 Koop, Georgea-~-"�-- 4733 Dorchester Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 142-10 8 City of H ngton 8-eac - 142-103-1! 9334' F! ckerAv' nue- F`�unta��•'�Vat1C Publish 9/,a*/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. 13 DATE: Monday, October/,, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-22/Negative Declaration No. 86-39 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: North of Heil Avenue, south of Alhambra Drive, between Silver Lane and Beach Boulevard ZONE: R2, Medium Density Residential PROPOSAL: To change zone designation from R2 (permitting one unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area) to R2-15 (permitting fifteen units per gross acre) This zone change is being processed as a result of the widening of Heil Avenue which has taken 25 feet from the rear of many of these lots. The intent is to increase the density such that the identical number of units are permitted to be constructed as would have been prior to the additional dedication for Heil Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-39 has been submitted to assess the environmental effects of the request. ON FILE: A legal description and a copy of the proposed zone change is on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 114 A.uV'i6rizl.d to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public no D, Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961, and A-248T1, dated 11 June, 1963. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Public Notice Advertitung covered by tore affidavit is set in 7 point with 10 pica column width I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of LEGAL NOTICE of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME ,ZiX§6Xi`d*AX&'+XKXto wit the issue(s) of September 25 198 6 198- 198- 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 25 198 6 a Mesa, Calif rnia. ignature 4 ;?_"i 110 PUBLIC NOTICE CORRECTED LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 86-20/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Hunt- ington Beach, California, on the date and at the time In-, dicated below to receive and, consider the statements of, all persons who wish to be I heard relative to the appli-' cation described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, Oc- tober 13, 1986, 7:30 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 - Appeal A P P L I- CANT/APPELLANT: Specialists Enterprises LOCATION: 17712 and 17762 Cameron Street (southeast corner Cameron Street and Newman Avenue) ZONE: R5 (Office Pro- fessional) PROPOSAL: Appeal to Planning Commission's de- nial of request to change the zone designation from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Resi- dential) which would permit a total of 13 units on the two sites. ENVIRONMENTAL I STATUS: Negative Declar- ation No. 86-34 has been submitted to assess the en- vironmental effects of the re- quest. ON FILE: A legal descrip- tion and copy of the proposal is on file in the De- partment of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648,for Inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited to attend i said hearing and express; opinions or submit evidence: for or against the application as outlined above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, By:-Ailcla M. Wentworth, City Clerk, Phone:(714) 536-5405 Published Orange Coast ,Daily Pilot September 25, 19'86 Th117 ZC. 86-a v PROOF OF PUBLICATION �a/13 / a�' •, �1 � to 17A pry 1D� " �b CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 22, 1986 CALIFORNIA 92648 Jerome M. Bame, Attorney at Law 2130 Main Street, Suite 140 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Appeal to Zone Change 86-20/Negative Declaration 86-34 The City Council at its regular meeting held October 20, 1986 granted your appeal to the Planning Commission denial of Zone Change 86-20 and Negative Declaration 86-34. Please contact the Development Services Department for future information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB: bt CC: George H. Derry, M. D. Specialist Enterprises 7572 Alhambra Drive Huntington Beach, California 92647 (Telephone: 714-536-5227 ) • Au"rized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds Including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County. California. Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961. and A-24831. dated 11 June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Public Noun Au.«usrng er by this affidavit is W in pbint with 10 pica column width I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME -XkWsXMKXYA*XKsXto wit the issue(s) of September 23 t98 6 , 198 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 23,198 6 o to Mesa, Califo ignature PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 86-20/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street. Hunt- ington Beach, California, on the date and at the time in- dicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the appli- cation described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, Oc- tober 6, 1986. 7:30 P.M APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 - Appeal A P P L I - `CANT/APPELLANT: Specialists Enterprises LOCATION: 17712 and 17762 Cameron Street (southeast corner Cameron Street and Newman Avenue) ZONE- R5 (Office Pro- fessional) PROPOSAL: Appeal to Planning Commission's de- nial of request to change the zone designation frorr, R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Resi- dential) which would permit a total of 13 units on the two sites. PUBLIC NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL, STATUS: Negative Declar- ation No. 86-34 has been' submitted to assess the en- vironmental effects of the re- quest- i ON FILE: A legal descrip- tion and a copy of the proposal is on file in the De- partment of Development Services. 2000 Main Street. Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648. for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above- All appli- cations. exhibits. and de- scriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, BY: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot September 23, 1986 T376 -d 260 PROOF OF PUBLICATION REQUEST r"OR CITY COUNCIL tiCTION Date October 13, 1986 i Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator 0 Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Service 4-) ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 86-34 - Subject. SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES - APPEAL OF PLANNING C MMISSION DENIAL Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission denial of his zone change request on August 19, 1986. The request is for a change of zone from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) on a .54 acre site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and staff recommend denial of Zone Change No. 86-20 and Negative Declaration No. 86-34. Planning Commission action on August 19, 1986: ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY PORTER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Porter NOES: Erskine, Mirjahangir ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed zone change to R3 would not be compatible with surrounding land uses due to office development to the west, east and south of the site. 2. A zone change to R3 would isolate the R5, Office Professional site to the east and leave it as a "spot" zone surrounded on three sides by residential zoning. PI 0 4/81 3. The site is not appropriate for R3 zoning due to traffic generated by the medical offices and hospital complex along Newman Ave. 4. With a General Plan land use designation of Office Professional, the site was not intended to be used for residential purposes. The proposed zone change would not be compatible with the General Plan. ANALYSIS: The subject site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street was originally zoned R2. A zone change was approved in 1969 to redesignate the property as R5. After analysis of the existing land uses, including the medical office building abutting the property to the east, and the newly constructed medical office building to the south which is part of the Humana Hospital complex, staff could not support this request. The proposed zone change would isolate the existing medical office building and create a spot -zoning of R5 of approximately 14,160 square feet which would then be surrounded by residential zoning on three sides. On April 1, 1986, the City Council approved Zone Change No. 86-5 at 8111 Newman Avenue from R5 to R3-25 to allow four units. This property is removed by one lot (120 feet) from the subject site, in between is the existing medical office building. There are several characteristics of the subject site that differ from that of the site of the previous zone change. The location of the subject property is more impacted by the traffic generated by the hospital complex due to the location of the drives. In addition, the newly completed office building on the Humana Hospital grounds is located immediately to the south of the subject property and would have a significant negative impact on the development of residential units on the property. The building is thirty-five feet high, with just a 10 foot setback from Newman Avenue. At the time it was approved, no special considerations were made for the buffering of the office building since the property to the north was also zoned Office Professional. Due to the size of the property, there is not sufficient room on the site itself to provide any buffering in terms of setbacks, open space, etc. The office building towers over the site and would block the view, light and air for any residential development. Finally, the previous zone change site was abutting residential zoning (R3) on the east side and north side. The subject property abuts residential zoning to the north only. RCA - 10/13/86 -2- (6300d) • ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services has posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-34 for ten days. This review period expired August 10, 1986. A negative declaration should be issued if the request is approved. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-20, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-34. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Should the City Council wish to grant a zone change to R3 for the site, staff recommends that the entire north side of Newman Avenue currently zoned R5 be included. The City Council should direct staff to expand the boundary of the zone change, ask the applicant to agree to a continuance, contact the property owner of the adjacent parcel and renotice the request for the entire area. Since the General Plan designation is Office Professional for the stretch of Newman Avenue, a land use amendment should be processed to create consistency between zone district and general plan. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of appeal dated August 28, 1986 2. Planning Commission staff report and minutes dated August 19, 1986 with attachments: a. Area map and surrounding land uses b. Zoning map c. Negative Declaration No. 86-34 JWP:JA:kla RCA - 10/13/86 -3- (6300d) ' • • JEROME M. BAME ATTORNEY AT LAW 2130 MAIN STREET• SUITE 140 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 960-4329 �11�•� C�� r ,,V�Q August 28,_'l 6 City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Re: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 (To Change the Zoning from R5/Office Professional District to R3/Medium High Density Residential) LOCATION: 17712/17762 Cameron Street (Northeast Corner at Newman Avenue) ACREAGE: .54 Acres TO: CITY CLERK and CITY COUNCIL: Please consider this as constituting notice that SPECIALISTS ENTER- PRISES OF 7572 Alhambra Drive, Huntington Beach, the Applicant/Owner of the above -indicated zone change and subject property, does hereby appeal the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change No. 86-20/Nega- tive Declaration No. 86-34, made on August 19, 1986. Applicant/Owner appeals to the City Council on the following grounds: A. That R3 medium high density residential development of the subject site would be compatible with a substantial portion of the surrounding land uses; B. That the subject site, being over one-half acre, is of adequate size to accommodate the number of units per- mitted; C. That there currently exists fifteen (15) Medical Profes- sional office buildings within a one (1) block radius of the Site, most of which currently have vacancies, consti- tuting an over -saturation of Office Professional (R5) uses already constructed; D. That R3 (Medium High Density Residential) would be the best future use of the subject property and%would en- hance the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. City Clerk August 28, 1986 Page 2 Applicant/Owner has been substantially aggrieved by the decision of the Planning Commission to deny Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34; and, accordingly, hereby submits its APPEAL to the City Council. Most respectfully, )ME M. BAME JMB:mgw ACKNOWLEDGED: SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES BY a. Adcn> Dr. George . Derry, M.D. Applicant/Owner I . 0 • SrAf f huntington beach development services department REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August 19, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 APPLICANT/ Specialists Enterprises DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: 7572 Alhambra Drive July 3, 1986 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 REQUEST: To change the zoning from MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE R5 (Office Professional September 2, 1986 District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) ZONE: R5 (Office Pro essional District) LOCATION: 17712/17762 Cameron St. (northeast corner at GENERAL PLAN: Office Newman Avenue) Professional ACREAGE: ..54 acre EXISTING USE: Two single family dwellings 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Deny Zone Change No. 86-20 and Negative Declaration No. 86-34 subject to findings outlined in this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of August 5, 1986. The applicant is requesting a change of zone from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). The subject site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street was originally zoned R2. A zone change was approved in 1969 to redesignate the property as R5. The Planning Commission and City Council approved a zone change from R5 to R3-25 in April of this year for another parcel further east on this segment of Newman Avenue. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Office Professional ZONE: R5 (Office Professional) LAND USE: Two single family dwellings m u C-6. A-FM-23A • • North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZO::E,: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS! High Density Residential R3 (Medium High Density Residential) Apartments Office Professional R5 (Office Professional) Medical Office Building (across Newman Avenue) Office Professional R5 (Office Professional) Hospital (across Cameron Street) General Commercial C4 (Highway Commercial) Office Building Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services has posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-34 for ten days. This review period expired August 10, 1986: The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaratioi. be issUed. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-20, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-34. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7.0 SPECTFTC PLAN! Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -2- (5894d) • 0 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: In the staff report dated August 5, 1986, Staff had recommended approval of the applicants request. After further analysis of the existing land uses, including the medical office building abutting the property to the east, and the newly constructed medical office building to the south which is part of the Humana Hospital complex, staff cannot support this request. The proposed zone change would isolate the existing medical office building and create a spot -zoning of R5 of approximately 14,160 square feet which would then be surrounded by residential zoning on three sides. Attached is an aerial map depicting existing lard uses in the area and their relationship. On April 1, 1986, the Planning Commission did approve zone change No. 86-5 at 8111 Newman Avenue from R5 to R3-25 to allow four units. This property is removed by one lot from the subject site, in between is the existing medical office building. There are several characteristics of the subject site that differ from that of the site of the previous zone change. The location of the subject property is more impacted by the traffic, generated by the hospital complex due to the location of the drives. In addition, the newly completed office building is located immediately to the south of the subject property and would have a significant negative impact on the development of residential units on the property. The building is thirty-five feet high, with just a 10 foot setback from Newman Avenue. At the time it was approved, no special considerations were made for the buffering of the office building since the property to the north was also zoned Office Professional. Due to the size of the property, there is not sufficient room on the site itself to provide any buffering in terms of setbacks, open space, etc. The office building towers over the site and would block the view, light and air for any residential development. Finally, the previous zone change site was abutting residential zoning (R3) on the east side and north side. The subject property abuts residential zoning to the north only. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Zone Change No. 86-20 and Negative Declaration No. 86-34 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed zone change to R3 would not be compatible with surrounding land uses due to office development to the west, east and south of the site. 2. A zone change to R3 would isolate the R5, Office Professional site to the east and leave it as a "spot" zone surrounded on three sides by residential zoning. Staff Report - 8/19/86 -3- (5894d) • • 3. The site is not appropriate for R3 zoning due to traffic generated by the medical offices and hospital complex along Newman Ave. 4. with a General Plan land use designation of Office Professional, the site was not intended to be used for residential purposes. The proposed zone change would not be compatible with 'Che General Plan. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Should the Planning Commission wish to grant a zone change to R3 for the site, staff recommends that the entire north side of Newman Avenue currently zoned R5 be included. The Planning Commission should direct staff to expand the boundary of the zone change, ask the applicant to agree to a continuance, contact the property owner of the adjacent parcel and renotice the request for the entire area. Since the General Plan designation is Office Professional for the stretch of Newman Avenue, a land use amendment should be processed to create consistency between zone district and general plan, but since the three sites together are less than one acre, it need not be completed prior to action on an expanded zone change area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map and surrounding land uses 2. Zoning map 3. Negative Declaration No. 86-34 � wP:.;A:tl Staff Report - 8/19/86 -4- (5894d) O O .l _ .,..... -�� �'�y,,rJr r `-{,��'yM;�1y' {y�y �a�� r,,,,,,rIII °lll `�i•1 ^•11� �./�l• �'� r,) pY .. _ _ <._ — _ _. -._ .�o;, 0., o ti r oa °gC1YU(J° p. I �•V ��^ an+� Y /, l(wlri,71 r� gyp• e 6'� o �.--���,J ° 1 ' . /. • � `�"J . d � • I -may rc." r ',• �o. n ,'�° 1 ,^ASV:+ ., � ib � Q Jd° y aln, , •� .. � U a� p� oil' .(d� • �,js�^ •1 np ° Y ° ° ° o^y�� ° "'GI �' (f ib o i" 0°Y o •`^o'd �+'. �g�cf4 •. a.: 5 i o I ♦ poc>�q w� a°�9 c 4 o�p• �.>0` ° a�°, -4 R Udo ° !,e u LrJb J g �9 "uIJ �10 Qa c'i�s o eo- 14 o J ,Lyy �T 3 II II L� w, "!; °w oot� tl pn'lo°• CS JU l qV ly®� OfT Iq)(wTyy��){�� r)fl��' O O •a VE p4.'O ' \( r. 1i®o1(S'� O a • L Qg ° p.. o ('.: �.J> _ ` �o � I . a�_ 0 , „ .. �i �•ptipR fl �Or � ; t • Q U a,�j S9 . /�j o' I� ° ° � Y Ili J} '•¶ � .r ., s � '� � ,� �,�, 0 10 o W a ii0 � o —.0 a G, .6vcG(jYy7iforn °0 0 0."JJJI'. J� o at nncec cS .' :✓aD°m° p U „�Ci,c..o aoor�„a,o ac,�cyC.°"-c".:J a, cJo aG.`� � �no� �u�(^Z�r��P !'n r;l•c 4.Wmcr,c�`iryl�r-:, ��.,.°%?:^ :?cOa:I�Yk+'...^.`:.)C%x�?0 �as.o�f^ B p c�� '.-o^.o C�NB o o r7 ° uax�."�-c7 Jiu�J-J oQ(a`.. p o.�.✓,�.-LC^`�G7GlY>cr�:t%;.!�."--� y��n Y.1t� �� "�'•� qp�-3w[:�5'p�y '�j,.f! ,fig � c�^..y'o.aan �a� p,..,a' m�.^.��"..rc� „`".1a.d ��,°:rJ < � z:oan� �or...,p(u.�^ .kw.�•.�,--r,..._ "'�.1aYz�CW�a(F�>�^c�� r ,.a,.,wc�.,� °:G--�`s�� ° ° «, �h Y •. •Y.J,o J C lJ c^� ax t =m '..x v o u oca n r�J < o `JQ,ch(�y:J<.t,cY yl c1� 1(_tivo :� ,n o Uy7J `'o • o ° e, 1'?)t�q ,o )u.• w„n..,^-..!"✓iu w-..✓�l�.u,�.,!''rl'd[<J'F�:�''1(Y�I "'o - ..,_``'„Qn �`d .�� o�✓.� .L.AiL.��i1_�✓; r ri �,'�-'C }fR�yul -�f''?f �'i �r.d jj�� e«,� ou 1 �l L�,�s'' v ���:��9c�� mr Y?JG; ti� �;C��?'•�:7�k��',;.��r�.11 '� ��-�`.. .:...: ;•1 !a 'F�Li. f.S! c NG • DM 30 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 25-5-II -AAA .r.... E OF ADOPTED AUGUST e 1940 cm couwc0 o.Dlwiw2 WeCITV ..Y� r"uO'lrTa'nOae'F a[4004ror'O,i[u.1nMLrI•oi+."o.[+♦1+ r • or �+ AMENDED ORD AMENDED ELM Ono M0. LEGEND 3-27-61 ,6D e29 t2-0-N 19-s 1275 Q� cprfwwli. r4cw.1D[f rta4:4i47rp an.c+ 12 -.-61 211 e77 a-61 216 ..D S- 7 -62 237 f00 1-3_{7oo66S 0370 9- 1e-67 67_221349 .AS o f�p1 R4rKC M'K.Or/[n of*/ri HUNTII�TGTON BENCH :_ 6•M-62 2S1 We 67-bN3" !• ■-N P-S A,e _iJ f4a[ r4w7 /[faa[1c[ 9si/e* 63 110 9S7 6. "" W2 1417 L11 fr,pLL 3af[ 1ur1[i[n1 •-fc •►' r•ry 63 3.9 966 12- 16-6e N+i NS, -- 5�2i OT/rJfi. f17M0a ORT1/[+ (. t ORANGE COUNTY. L 1 <► " \ I CALIFORNIA ::; r S-3-63 "I ,et 6.24-63 33O „6 •. 7_{, 67-3214M .. IS. 6,-9131e ��L +wo rra. Kwnv o/+.ci li I .� _'�s`: • 12 - 2 - G! 377 ,02 , 2 - 16. 71 PP70-e 1632 -a .4»..r. I—, •lir c7 - ate; MV 1 - 6 - M 3901026 Q-2O.7! Pill .-A 16,0 -AL, o,f-. _3i ante IlAiL [ i. •.- y` . r lfy - 20-64 Set 103 • -12 71.39 .13, Zi K,O[/i- 4prp T— D,nK' - •-16-64 40e 1043 3-70-12 7W1161S �,y,..� oaf; [cqq:ss/-- • 1x +.EGEND 5 - 14 - 64 Be9 1052 - 72 72-3 1739 pyr e-19-64 463 101, 4-17_72 72-4174: - 4 - 63 495 1 1 - - 72 72-1D 1744 _ - >R,b J[ !-7-73 72-4e 1e32 N-7, 7i-2617'w i 6.�72 reml 91 -- r4[_p[ rlu a f,wj- rcrr[/i ;-[ s+ WARNER JT UL_r�L—JU Avi RI RI I -.Tv- or r0uwnry w..E7 r � c � z Ga• nj IM2102 I i.j 1 iRi 2E C 4.? —r— ¢I d� r' [R1= LAND DR r RI Ri. 7. J i aF 1 O6a7 I ;C4 ,. J I i S I I I ' J C4 i I.L a,laol r ZI TALBERT AREA • f fi P AVE 201VE CHAty - F- _ No. 86 -Ao __ G•�/E/?: SPEC/� L /S�"S E�t//E2/-�.2 '. �' - 20' 30' 3 O i If 420 ��os'r�ir,9L. - = 1 - :C " ^y'- - yip •"' :tom^ ^���.-� ` _ _ - ._- � -ate 2`.�.�-•�. '�T - 3;:----'•%"'� - _ - - _ v�/s=-�_r�. 'c.: •�. 1�-:..� ts_ '4`'„'�s ter''-'-tri'i'+'_- • - - r- -..- -•:+d- l�'.-.. ',,`7 r�:"•':_:.�. =c- �_ 4�• l�'a% - :a .�_.-ram'.-":-'q�-'�-•��_•r:. - - � _- __ _- - _ _ _ - - � 3� _• ��.�., Y^.�-__ _ _ ,�.1' :ram. .. .e � j:_ t• ��. -- •- - ,1 R-..=� - �.-T� - _ - =1.�. = T-; .'��.-�dYw '_�.. �a.e 'ram _ •i �e - ., ' • --_ _•�;-_ •: .: �i ;.yam. �'r.'.: .. � _�'::-.-- �••�.-..-'=�^•�..'.^;r ?i.'yj;� ..v ..a.: :-1: -7 ;=-^ .._-lsi� Z- '..., �,. .c .' _ - ��"IffOF-- HUNTINGTON _ 13KACH--= _INTER DEPARTMENT: COMMUNICATION , i'-- - To Jeff Abramowitz, From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Assi s tan t P I a ner SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date July 29, 1986 NO. 86-34 Applicant: Specialist Enterprises 7572 Alhambra Drive 842-7791 Renuest: Zone Change From R5 To R3 Location: Northeast Corner. Of Cameron Street & Newman Avenue Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Of ice fit-t e City Clerk for a 10-day public nevi.ew-period ending S and no comments, the attached com6ts were reeived. Recommendation -. The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the approve Negative Declaration No.• fi—nding that the -proposed pro ect w 1 not have a significant adverse effect -on' the environment.:­ Mitiqation Measures The -attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects re ting from.the project and are recommended as_ conditions of approval. R p ctful 1 ubmi tied, ' ri& Teran Blaisure _ Assistant Planner Y'JRB/dcNt - - - - w . ,...a'v`�..�-:s.�= y�t� _ -x-.^�.. . �a �.c. - ... -.r - - `=s1.r- -i r-'•. 7 . rr �', rs: •_�•.'•`:i- .iG:.s .3 �+'.'"'_�ZY [ci..-�1'huK+�,.a'A ...=-::r^ . `Yk'� fir":.-� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 111. AL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPOS I. BACKGROUND 1. Applicant Specialist Enterprises 2. Address 7572 Alhambra Drive 3. Telephone842-7791 4. Project Location NEC of Cameron Street % Newman Avenue 5. Project Title/Description _ Nesative Declaration No.86-344 6. Date ,luly 29, 1986 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are reouirec on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, dy flora ant fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No � Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No �/ 3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon., or :_- su t in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, po ice, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No 5. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/hou ng, energy/utilities, natural resources, hwnan health? Yes Maybe No 0. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). III. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( /) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No 2. Will project achieve short -term -goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No ,,/ 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No �/ V. DETERMINATION ( ) Negative Declaration ( �) Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report DATE Z 2 SIGNATURE 0AJ:L STANDARD MITIGATING N]EASL'RES _ 1. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers. 2. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 3. :Aw vol..mm-me heads shall be used on all showers. / 4 kit building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable raterial, shall be disposed of at ar, offsite facility equipped to h&ndle them. 5 The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be oonstn,icted in compliance with the state amx)sticai standards set forth for units U.at lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. The interior noise levels of all dwelling units shall not exceed the Califorraa insulation standards of 45 dba CNEL. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoust-, cal engineering, with the applicat-or. for bu-, ld.i.^g perrut (s) . All measures recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable levels snail oe incorporated into the design of the project. 6. If lzgntung is included in the parking lot and/or recreation area energy efficier t lamps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide). All outside light z g small be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent primer i es . 1. A detailed sods analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils-*ngireer. This analysis shall include on --site soil sampling and laboratory 'Vesting of materia's to provide detailed reccurendatiocns regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets, and utilities. S. if foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as zpprvved by the Building Department. 9. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to suman,t a report indicating the ground surface acceleration fron earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural manbers to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits. 4_ 10. A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the property during construction and during initial operation of the project shall be submitted to the Califor*ua Regional Water Quality Control Bound staff for their review prior to the issuance of grading permits. 11. Information on equipment or facilities whim may generate air pollutants shall be �- submitted to the South Coast Air Quality Management District staff for their review prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any use within the building. v 12. All lard 4yee,s _mu4 IaQ, rem l 4 reeS. 13. ,. i . _ - ..1 A 1AI v_ .''' iR r#L: -+sr .�� R F•f'-' s r k• "a `'� ~�:i� "� •;' �; ,.'3a�,;.pX;u'yart r'' ••4{'_�. • � s + �� _... +i.%_•'*_..._.. _ . C_ .Y_ �..... ... _ _ ,.s .v, r a. � . - _... ,.._ ._. a �. _i .r _ .. Pg'J'_' a i_erg_1.r��.`J_.sad.._:�.'.f�:.�'._.97ae.�..'..{.at�.�. ��.Y� } � ns� The Commission agreed that a mechanism was needed to take care of the present needs for the well being of the community. Staff was asked to get statistics from the Fire Department on how many properties burn down each year and how many are non -conforming. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ROWE, TO CONTINUE CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-10 TO THE SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-6 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 This item was continued from the Planning Commission me ting of August 5, 1986.. The applicant is requesting a change of zone from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). The subject site at the northeast corner of Newman Avenue and Cameron Street was originally zoned R2. A zone change was approved in 1969 to redesignate the property as R5. The Planning Commission and City Council approved a zone change from R5 to R3-25 in April of this year for another parcel further east on this segment of Newman Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services has posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-34 for ten days. This review period expired August 10, 1986. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-20, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-34. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Dr. George Derey, representing Specialists Enterprises, spoke in support of the zone change. He stated that Specialists Enterprises wish to build residential units on the property instead of medical offices. The two lots are facing Cameron Street. There are residential units across the street. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the project and the public hearing was closed. The Commission felt that the proposed zone change should be continued because the boundaries of the zone change need to be expanded. However action was needed because the mandatory processing time would expire on September 2, 1986. PC Minutes - 8/19/86 -14- (6022d) A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECOND BY PORTER TO DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34, WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Porter NOES: Erskine, Mirjahangir ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. The proposed zone change to R3 would not be compatible with surrounding land uses due to office development to the west, east and south of the site. 2. A zone change to R3 would isolate the R5, Office Professional site to the east and leave it as a "spot" zone sur ounded on three sides by residential zoning. 3. The site is not appropriate for R3 zoning due to traffic generated by the medical offices and hospital complex along Newman Ave. 4. With a General Plan land use designation of Office Professional, the site was not intended to be used for residential purposes. The proposed zone change would not be compatible with the General Plan. C-7 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-22/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-39 This item was continued from the meeting of August 5, 1986 to allow staff to arrive at the best approach for solving a problem concerning the density calculations for a specific area of the community. This zone change is being processed by the City to ensure that a like number of units can be constructed on each lot after additional dedication for the widening of Heil Avenue west of Beach Blvd. The zone change is deemed necessary due to the large additional right-of-way dedication required by the Public Works Department. The additional area will be twenty-five feet off existing lots that are presently 120 feet in length. Seventeen lots are included in this request; the lot at the corner of Silver Lane and Heil Avenue is not a part of the zone change. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-39 for ten days, and no comments, either time, verbal PC Minutes - 8/19/86 -15- (6022d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 14, 1986 Jerome M. Bame, Attorney At Law 2130 Main Street - Suite 140 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting held Monday, October 13, 1986, approved your request for a continuance of the hearing on your appeal filed on Zone Change No. 86-20 to the October 20, 1986 Council meeting. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:cb enc. 1 Telephone: 714-536-5227 ) .JEROME M. BAME .Y. ATTORNEY AT LAW 2130 MAIN STREET, SUITE 140 !//` `� C/� {���✓(� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 960-4329 r� J� n le October 2, 1986 °? City Clerk City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE Re: Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 -- Appeal From October 13 to October 20, 1986 Council Meeting Dear City Clerk and City Council: Due to the Council's impacted Agenda for its meeting on October 13, 1986, Applicant in Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 hereby requests that the Public Hearing on Applicant's Appeal be continued to October 20, 1986. Your consideration in this regard is appreciated. Very truly yours, JEROME M. BAN Counsel for App li,eant JMB:mgw APPLICANT: SPECIALISTS ENTERPRISES B d Y� � DR. GE RGE DERRY Publish - 9/25/86 CORRECTED LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 86-20 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, October 13, 1986, 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 - Appeal APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Specialists Enterprises LOCATION: 17712 and 17762 Cameron Street (southeast corner Cameron Street and Newman Avenue) ZONE: R5 (Office Professional) PROPOSAL: Appeal to Planning Commission's denial of request to change the zone designation from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) which would permit a total of 13 units on the two sites. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-34 has been submitted to assess the environmental effects of the request. ON FILE: A legal description and a copy of the proposal is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 fNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CAL JNIN(y OM m i ia;-LS DPAIII- ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-20 NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-34 Cc) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. APPLICATION NUMBER: l986 7:`� PF; Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 APPLICANT Specialists Enterprises LOCATION: 17712 and 17762 Cameron Street (southeast corner Cameron Street and Newman Avenue) ZONE: R5 Xf�'ce eProfessional) c anrho L ST:' ge the zone designation from R5 (Office Q Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) which would permit a total of 13 units on the two sites. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. ON FILE: submitted to assess the pp effects of the request. 86--34 has been environmental A eel of the proposed is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington 3eac;-., California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions o: submit evidence for or against the application as outlined :,. t;;zrz are any `u:cher questions please call Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. (565ld-5) James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission HUNTINGTON BEACR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r JUL 28 19ho p• 0. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 9264E 167-471-10 :iai;g Dulgarian 826 k. 62nd St r,os Angeles, Calif. 90001 167-472-14 onald Blatt 4021 Figaro Circle Huntington Beach, Calif. 92649 167-471-11 167-472-15 Cameron Apartment Ltd George Neishi 1215 Sand Key 18015 Mt Norby Circle Corona Del Mar, Calif. 92625 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 167-471-12 and 167-471-13 167-483-34 Ching Hai Enterprises Robert L. Stellrecht 1786 Oriole Dr 16591'Graham St Costa Mesa, Calif. 92626 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92649 167-471-14 167-601-01 Teunis J. Deering Center For Special 9568 Hamilton Suite # 343 c/o Surgery Inc. Huntington Beach, Calif. 17752 Beach, Blvd 92646 Huntington Beach, Calif. Zoh� • 00 167-471-15 167-601-02 Roger D. Slates Huntington Intercommunity 1701 Main St P.O. Box 1438 Huntington Beach, Calif. Louisville, KY 40201 92648 • 167-471-18 and 167-471-19 167-601-03 Specialists Enterprises Huntington Associates 17822 Beach, Blvd #201 P.O. Box 1438 Huntington Beach, Calif. Louisville, KY 40201 92647 167-471-20 Arnold A. angelici 21902 Starfire Lane Huntington Beach, Calif. 92646 167-472-09 Mitsuru Yamada 7942 Speer Ave Huntington Beach, 92647 167-472-10 and 167-472-11 Joan Caras P.O. Box 266 Palos Verdes Estates 90274 167-472-12 R. B. I. Ltd c/o Medical Building Plaza 17692 Beach Blvd #6 Huntington Beach, Calif. 167-472-13 + Ashton Investments 6657 Maryland Dr. Los Angeles, Calif. 90048 167-602-14 Humajja Inc. c/o Hospital P.O. Box 1438 Louisville KY 40201 Jerome Bame 2130 Main Street Ste 140 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . • Publish O.t►c.E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMBSION DFXIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 2 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application desc_"�elow. DATE/TIME: APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Monday, Oc bei O 986, 7:30 P.M. Zone Change No. 86-20/Negative Declaration No. 86-34 - Appeal Specialists Enterprises 17712 and 17762 Cameron Street (southeast corner Cameron Street and Newman Avenue) R5 (Office Professional) PROPOSAL: Appeal to Planning Commission's denial of request to change the zone designation from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential) which would permit a total of 13 units on the two sites. F.NVIROMCMNTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-34 has been submitted to assess the environmental effects of the request. ON FILE: A legal description and a copy of the proposal is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COINCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 ._ .. �i ` '8 - 1 •�,•. ail T�W­ Jk~ �f v I 23 Q I 14 •,°. $ 22 n• •• 1 � 1 .e/.rf r//• ?0 JO oAF 1 t5 ,� ; NO./02/3 1 �o NO. 43_q �. •, a' r� I .,.i• ,NO.r46Q2 irff! as' s• f!' trff rr NO. 439 f, * �-- $ VAN BUREN J _ STREET _ l.�) ro r. fr ', • +; n' AID / '4. s; r- D9cr re.N ►� � � Oa ' .. �� .. • T q ACT TRACT I' W ; I z 13 t 26 .♦ J sI ^ Q V a 41 ^ i • w a i �r+r! f r„/ Q f' 10 21 22 23 ?4 +• 25 26 27 2B O j ? V O O s II "v 14 s 31 N ,j 19 NO. 6073 a > 6 +. �—r..�e // H „+. n /9 ./crl/ /O 9 A 7 G S ♦ J " /O /S » fe wc.e• IF en er oTRACT 0 Q. to z 15 +,/f+�jr-t- G°•' : O l(`� -�cn c�:�R �,AIt3tQ 1�1 •r ,r To- NAP WbS P k°.. 01 y I �• �i / i P�t?PJS' .$ !i !► O g' t�� ( -r -a' Nfl C'l'I RAt TE T 4 O•.+. .„! 8 k 9 a .�t7 iJFAC ..r 16 lVE. ANY Uh. Io' ONAIN /6' MO 432E'-� ;�w: u +r fr s. in ..t B 9 �t.• • l:s - JU1ITY t7 its'-- 1+ '� �r:l ;:�( t0 ���2Q'�AS ES�O 14 IS /6 /7 Is /9 10 /rs ra• TR V IQ D. x i tj as Q � tV 20471 1�,� li � I n 22.. I --A r cos' rre• a♦ 4' CAMERON W Q 1 ,i BEACH I MI/NT/N6TON NfACw B[ yn / E c 13 ,i: Vic 1 ti 1 2 1 14 1 VO 405 15 W t 2 I fr .•ri• A BOULEVARD C GY VA -7 22 NO 10213 ] ,; NO 439 s µ ' • °V NO 4602 VAN BURN I— J �— r1I n i n ffl •' % r . 7 CAMERON v 0 h �1 4 BEACH J a ^O4'O A S 94-9 O 47 J 0 f NUN/ING)oN B(ICM Bl yr J r to NO 439 STREET' �I z s 4: TEE�y,-� s STREET - u .. ul.. .lI✓Lr 11 k p rz 04 N NO 405 t0, 2 O 1 J BOULEVARD r OO V / 1 3 71 P 4 TR.4 � �. v� w ^ 13 R /i /� � r • � a r ' .: r.O M v 00 6 ,` t " 14 .' a •� 9 iJ v�• 1 N. y 6 T s •. oroa I/ l��. �.,, 19 Svc! I/ /O 9 /O /S PC q o TRACT � • , •• •w i0 : 0 1 �' 18 • Ant �. C9) ti D*A/N 16. .t vo • .• it - -cg.)fx i- 17 /I 1 /6 ► W 1 W TRACT CAM£RON o •4- I .-�- I 0 I 10 ` t II 22. n 20 w� 5TR££T ri.o .: • ) •.e' .re• ass �..� sa a. A i2f 1 •y" JA 7 s 6 7 B `� 9 i•i ro ` � � ► O 4 O p � I I � Z � .. 0 3 0 . 472 R O 10 II c o 12 0 � 1.nt.• • . of ri ye • 14 1 I c f N 0 't `405 D15 NO. � •o is .�o nr iti o�• ti BEACH i HmvrlmarDM BFAC'N BLS a W Q so' I so J we razed to PubliSn Advertisements of all kin jciudrng public nrll*i� " s by Decree of tree Superior Court of Grange County. CairlL nva. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 196t, and A-248-1, dated It June. 1%3, STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Pumc "01WA .,,,.n,,,np cow,.d ey it" am"VA of sin - 7 P— .nth to we cokom .roe, , I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid-, I am over the age of eighteen years. and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine. the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME CSX&ii �a to wit the issue(s) of September 25 198 6 198 198 _ -_ 198 ':�8 I declare, under penalty of pE y. in&4, the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 25 198 6 at to Mesa, Ca ifornia. 1,4 Signature I PUBLK Nob -- L P,c HEARMAPPM . PLAlNNl10 TL`OMfIApON DENIM OF /LOIIE'CHANGE NOTICE Ili HEREBY GIVEN am the Beech CRY COW". a public howft in the Cota- om Chamber at the Hunt- ktpton eeac+t tint Cater, 2000 Main StreaL Hum- Ington Beach, CaMorrnia, on On deft and at tie Mu In- dicated below to rtoelve and consider rate statamanb of all parsons who wish to be heard relative to the appN- eatlon described below, DATE/TIME: Monday, Oc- tober 6, 1966, 7:30 PM APPLICATION NUMSER: GensrM Plant Amarithnent 6&3/ErnvIrornmer" Impact tint 66-2/Zane Change LOCATION: Northwest corner of Eft Averaw and Goidernwest Street. PROPOSAL: An appeal by A.C. Marion to the Planning ConeMselon's denial of his r"west for General Plan Amendment 6&3 and Zone Charps ti8-21. HIs request Is to dange the General Plan designation tram Gerard Commercial to Medium 1 Density Rsefdentlal on 10.1 scree of property heated an tiw northwest tamer of Eels Avenue and Goldenwest Street. Zone Change 66-21 Is being proposed concur- rently with this request to change the zoning from C2-0 (Community Business District combined with ON) to R2-PD (Medium Density ,Planned Residential Do- velopment). The request could nisult in approximate- ly 140 dwelling unfit. An ap- peal to the Planning Com- mission's September 16, 1986 denial of General Plan► Amendment 66-3/Zonal Change W21 has besn Hied by the property owner A. C- Marion. ENVIRONMENTAL, STATUS: Environmentel in- pReport 8&2 Is being owsssed concurrently, with this &Wlc;atlon- ON FILE: A legal descrip- tion and copy of the proposed General Plan AmerWmarrt, Environmental Impact Report, and Zone Charge is on file in the De- SServic�is, 20doo�t Huntington Beach, Calf- iorL 42048, for Inspection ALe public. LINTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and atpraes opidone or "Ibmitevidence for or against the application as outlined above. AN appti- exhiblts, snd de - of Proposal with �the OMbs of tCaNfanCH tlR I pectisrn the I ca�4311. !A§oob P�iunst 17 % M� otiMwk_' 1 25' TAtt>t al �� P OF OF RUBt_iCATtO o„ 1e) 4hc T � L Authorizeci to Publish Advertisements of ids Including public notices by Decree of the Superior Coy -.of Orange County. Callfor'tie. Number A-62r14. dated 29 September. 1961. and a-24831, dated 11 June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Pubb[ Mouse Ao•erloWN covMel) oy ma smderii a fel n 7 point �lh 10 Dice column wldlh I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PTJRTrT'C HFAR•TNG of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for one '.time consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of J.une 3 6 198- 198 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is, true and correct. Executed on June 3 6 , 198 _ (7at-osta Mesa, California. Signature NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE ' NO.88-17 SERVICE STATION SUFFIXES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing In the Coun- cil Chamber 'at the Hunt- Ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Hunt- ington Beach, California, on the`"date and at,the time In- dicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the appli- cation described below. DATE: Monday, June 16, 1986 TIME: 7:30 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-17 LOCATION: City-wide APPLICANT: City of Hunt- Ington Beach PROPOSAL: To delete the -SS suffix on each site where It appears on the sectional district maps as a follow-up to .Code Amendment 86-8 which repealed the -SS provisions from the Hunt- Ington Beach Ordinance Code. ',ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed, pro- Ject is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental) QuaUty Act PUBLIC KOTICE •` ON FILE: A copy of the proposed, ordinance Is on Mile In the Department of, De- velopment Services. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as.outlin:d above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal are on file'wltWthe Offlce-of the City'Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for Inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, By: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clark;' Phone (714) 536-Mo Published OrangeCoast Daily Pilot June 3, 1986 T216 o PROOF OF PUBLICATION ' REQUER FOR CITY COUNCIPACTION Date June 16, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development fervices ev Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17; DELETION OF THE -SS, SERVICE STATION, SUFFIX Consistent with Council Policy? N-Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception© Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Code Amendment No. 86-8 consolidated all commercial standards into new Article 922 and incorporated all service station standards originally contained in Article 948. Where previously a service station had to obtain a change of zone to reconstruct/remodel, the new ordinance calls only for a Conditional Use Permit to be approved by the Planning Commission. All the same standards still apply with the exception of deleting this requirement for a zone change. Zone Change No. 86-17 is being processed in order to remove the obsolete -SS suffix from the eight sites within the City on which it has been placed. It should be noted that there is no proposal to alter the base district of these sites in any way. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action on May 20, 1986: ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17 AND RECOMMENDED ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None Staff recommendation is identical to that of the Planning Commission. ANAT.VRTG- The following sites are affected: -D 0� 12.0 PIO 4/84 • District Map No. Location District 1 Northwest corner C2 Magnolia/Adams 2 Northeast corner C2-CD Goldenwest/Yorktown 6 Northeast corner C4 Magnolia/Adams 11 Northeast corner C2 Springdale/Bolsa 13 Southeast corner C4 Beach/Adams 17 Southwest corner C2 Bolsa/Goldenwest 23 Southwest corner C2 Edinger/Bolsa Chica 40 Northeast corner C4 Beach/Garfield ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. Deny Zone Change No. 86-17 1. Ordinance 2. Planning Commission staff report dated 5/20/86 3. Minutes of May 20, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting JWP:JA:pb RCA - June 16, 1986 -2- (5278d) Some Commissioners felt that the Planning Commission should support the action they took on May 6 to delete the Hamilton extension. Other Commissioners felt that this proposal should be left open for further review to allow time to request and review all the State and County recommendations and comments. MOTION MADE BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY ROWE TO APPROVE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 86-1 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher NOES: Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None TIE VOTE; MOTION FAILS MOTION MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY PORTER TO DENY CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 86-1 AND MAINTAIN EXTENSION OF HAMILTON AVENUE BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None TIE VOTE; MOTION FAILS ITEM AUTOMATICALLY CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON JUNE 3, 1986 AS PER THE PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS C-7 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17 Code Amendment No. 86-8 consolidated all commercial standards into new Article 922 and incorporated all service station standards originally contained in Article 948. Where previously a service station had to obtain a change of zone to reconstruct/remodel, the new ordinance calls only for a Conditional Use Permit to be approved by the Planning Commission. All the same standards still apply with the exception of deleting this requirement for a zone change. Zone Change No. 86-17 is being processed in order to remove the obsolete -SS suffix from the eight sites within the City on which it has been placed. It should be noted that there is no proposal to alter the base district of these sites in any way. PC Minutes - 5/20/86 -10- (5241d) The following sites are affected: District Map No. Location District 1 Northwest corner C2 Magnolia/Adams 2 Northeast corner C2-CD Goldenwest/Yorktown 6 Northeast corner C4 Magnolia/Adams 11 Northeast corner C2 Springdale/Bolsa 13 Southeast corner C4 Beach/Adams 17 Southwest corner C2 Bolsa/Goldenwest 23 Southwest corner C2 Edinger/Bolsa Chica 40 Northeast corner C4 Beach/Garfield The proposed zone change would delete the -SS suffix on all eight sites. The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There were no persons to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17 WITH FINDINGS AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 5/20/86 -11- (5241d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the Planning Commission and City Council action on Code Amendment No. 86-8. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 3. The proposed zone change will not result in any change of permitted uses on the sites. C-8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-23 Condi Tonal Use Permit No. 86-23 is a request to permit live entert nment (piano bar only) within Tony Roma's Restaurant located at 7862 rner Avenue (Charter Centre). The applicant has indicated that the e ertainment will be limited to easy listening piano bar. Dancing will e prohibited within the restaurant. Valet parking will be provid for the convenience of the customers. The proposed proje is exempt Class 1, Section 15301 from the provisions of the Ca 'fornia Environmental Quality Act. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OR,ENED Maggie DiMinons, representin the applicant, was present and indicated all the findings and onditions of approval were acceptable to applicant. There were no other persons to speak or or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. The Commissioners felt there should be so e time limit imposed on the live entertainment. The Commissioners also wanted a revised cond tion of approval regarding noise disturbance. Staff indicated that the 80% occupancy level has been reached at Charter Centre and staff will request the propert owner to institute a parking study which will address the ci culation element. A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCHELL, SECOND BY PORTER, TO A ROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-23 WITH FINDINGS AND AME ED CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Porter, Mirjah ngir NOES: None ABSENT: Erskine ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED PC Minutes - 5/20/86 -12- (5241d) sraff TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPT.ICANT 0. • huntington beach development services department EPOR Planning Commission Development Services May 20, 1986 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17 City of Huntington Beach REQUEST To delete the -SS suffix on each site where it appears on the sectional district maps as a follow- up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the -SS provisions from the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: DATE ACCEPTED: May 12, 1986 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: July 12, 1986 ZONE: Base District C2 or C4 with -SS suffix EXISTING USE: Service Stations Approve Zone Change No. 86-17 based on the findings outlined in this report and recommend adoption by the City Council. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Code Amendment No. 86-8 consolidated all commercial standards into new Article 922 and incorporated all service station standards originally contained in Article 948. Where previously a service station had to obtain a change of zone to reconstruct/remodel, the new ordinance calls only for a Conditional Use Permit to be approved by the Planning Commission. All the same standards still apply with the exception of deleting this requirement for a zone change. Zone Change No. 86-17 is being processed in order to remove the obsolete -SS suffix from the eight sites within the City on which it has been placed. It should be noted that there is no proposal to alter the base district of these sites in any way. m u C-� A -F M-23A The following sites are affected: District Map No. Location District 1 Northwest corner C2 Magnolia/Adams 2 Northeast corner C2-CD Goldenwest/Yorktown 6 Northeast corner C4 Magnolia/Adams 11 Northeast corner C2 Springdale/Bolsa 13 Southeast corner C4 Beach/Adams 17 Southwest corner C2 Bolsa/Goldenwest 23 Southwest corner C2 Edinger/Bolsa Chica 40 Northeast corner C4 Beach/Garfield The attached ordinance deletes the -SS suffix on all eight sites. The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. 4.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. Not applicable. 6.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 7.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. Staff Report - 5/20/86 -2- (5143d) • •8.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-17 based on the following findings. 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the Planning Commission and City Council action on Code Amendment No. 86-8. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. 3. The proposed zone change will not result in any change of permitted uses on the sites. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. District Maps affected �VWP : J A : p b Staff Report - 5/20/86 -3- (5143d) _ PLANNING . T ZONING • DIM I SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 1-6-II - NOTE ADOPTECITY 01 COUNCIL JUNEORDINANCE 20. 1960 CITY GOUNtII ORDIN 6NCE NO- l)O �f •xr[wco To [.r[w 10 rlrtr ux*cA :ONE [ORE r .�• AMENDED CASE ORD-MO. AMENDED CA5 ORD. NO. L=LE NEIG 5-1.61 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 148 634 20-69 66-44 1144R69 5 --i- ?G_[�] -_n.�`_—A. • . aA[>CsfUA;O(1TCv'UulE 1EC0,SuaTcERas ICT 5 -I5 -61Sppbi639 -7-71 -1.12 1657 54CArl.f1[— 6Tnt Rx xR K. IR- S-)-62 23) 900 9-15.75 S-S 20" R-E STAnOx aT.Cl 10-IS-62 2644-, -21 97 '8HUNTINGTON BEACH 6--63 292 5--!9 79-5 266 `.wT" 5 3-63 316 969 12-:7 64 34 '7 2745 .0w4T CL,r ES 1RECREATI0 EO x'� s1 1s3 4-RRc17 cT R• 1CT 309•c0006 :26J6 6-64 32-067 CII-9S 35-9 2794 ;Cx4L 6-.5.e444a02 aEn[xAL .)RANGE ux[:'2-7_64 442 xx106 =>' 1- 4- — 56 063 B-S56 66-32 243 rzC- 10-13-66 66-37129 1-6-676fi62 1290 _ -L'Ert0 zs'rcanox --� - - —1.1 .. a4000cT'ox cl'J000.�.TMS'a�CT GARFIELD /AVfA RI . RI RI oRl RI = A. R2 PD RI V11E °R �' RI RI RI iRl� RI C] I I F N m i S rfa,2. JEAuvIIE oR i - ' IRI sfo 4 CF-R 1 R 1 �•. ^ R i!Rll RE.eR RI .rE s [. IRA I .e1 R R�� 1 \i4 RI R RI I ELG`��I .TRI W Law CF—E RI RI = _ 1 _ RI / i --g '�E'., •_'-..... .ono: aEE -���Y �� RI c. o RI W RI ' ao 3 IC4_ RI ' o U lT �RI RI :IRI ( RI — _ A[SCE x. CR 1 Ia �..•� ' C�-R i a4Nr DR eaav RI --� 1• RI 1 J i IRI RI RI _� RN m RI .�.: RI RI _ `,�R R4YE6 CR RI a RI ja RI RI F RI R I _o6Ra,xc a l a.-.000 Ia 04NBURY CA i C R TYLER CA RI RI • kI W 4 RI RI = RI IRI RI 401z CA o GILFORD CA �Rliit - RI a RI�4 $ j 2 - a �E RI a R ,. rorT Sao ro zcc 1 � R I s = x YORK TOWN RI RI 1 RI 1 � —� RI RI RI (Q)R3 �'-.v'2 erlE4zrt = RI '�>v - • '1 �' �E��E - ' Ax •� R I i� 4L9ArR066 OR RI = RI RI R I z cR4C�a RERRE OR .AJ I r RI R2zYE RI i i RI I R I . 'Cow c ' [• 3ar ''0i —J RI I COMr0x cn R. RI I / ii .4!Soo' --"60 r / RI I Iz RI �� RI CF-E i e _ I 4e 6� I rtz a ` RI z Y .F I. c r. :C I 9RF?.ERS OR 1R.:iisar4 / x RI P. i RI RI I cr w nco R.'w �. = wRarr['_L % RI I NB01 DOITIM R r, d` IRI I I RI �J' RI qRI RI RI = RI RI I RI OEER E. IJ 4 } J09EssE �5 R CUrrFF 4 R Q LJA. �J o� o ©(—��III RI = RI = RI 1 E R1 RICIA � IJ CALLAS Cr ELLMEAD OR J1 I IS (Z'J a/ I =1 a RI RI o1 RI f n"�'LYNLE 111 RI '~ i/ RI •IL IRI 4 0 R RI R I cL:vvcR OR x � RI RI R�� I l IRI / r.. a a i _ 4 xv0 T ` 4•g00ar /L4i - w i Lonoo'x[ucT a Q Im L ' . m Is =eo ^, RI 0 RI RI R I RI C 2 - xo-1r24•r - � y Q AL[ x wM 4 .�- L 2.eart d RI RI -4—. g 1 _ I[ r Z C_ 8 G - k _`1 PLANNING f% \ I — SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6-II NOTE: ADOPTED N•RON T.1960 CITY OF CITYCOUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 754 µ• t0.( TO... . 0/ .•. . Eftof r`J.tf ORD No �Q 9TT :•J[ ivy, Jutw ek.) M o-:e.o LEGE LEGEND: JTNe�gDl: r-�M l [. iDot(4( TNK BEACH .-.-n= .I..YL.0 r••aLmYut cNu.rt. cT•OTt.T.SiKDTOT 1L�DnTnr. 0DKdu,THUNTINGTON +Te ]--t 00. Iv�RK 0T f•.•f2 14. bn b 0 J .EVO(NTr•L ADKiWL -F.'x;OlUJ7Do D "1' '" .]-41af I;Ji u . t%D)) D L—T p31— L WT•.CT I°_n ...A 3.n \-e;ORavGE COUNTY, C LIFO RNIa : 3Oa1 tOri T -.2 4-. t].. •-eJ ,i-•3 t],] f 3.-6] >)� ITS-tR a-3 ,)J In .ovn'e ) ( .�4)a r'-. MM 3�OT .ONNw). MM[!! .......I �� .Yw... CorNr(.C�•L �—.J v.e i)v.-f-H )T. Ote 0.]-a. .11 9)0 Stir{ -)-)) 7, z. M' ] [D NULTrrL( r .(yDLKL 04i.KT _JYi L •!-a! )0'l ��)3 '2-a%• r{�. 21\0 IAL 1 2-1 SICIRESIO l rO..uN.. r.q�TI[S IC�vKI D�(T+KT Dl! 3ii39 �+?.O gad 3-�,-r) .L tt]O 1 VJ1 CO44N[D -Tw Oil MOOVMON )..f.)i r0-Ie {„9 •z.i0-ri ,-�e •. -n ,a-2 }-.f-r) ). J t2r1 xzt. fl [Oal ® WC "vf.�QT 1lJi a-ri It-�.Irl f0 u.20.n )\-n nn Lieu —.0 D.J.vicT--aoTaN VC(.1c rL.N • s. » _J LGARFIELD I I ! _. I I AVE. I L RA-0 P2 CI 5 P' Mi MH u H 0 O RA-0 R2 R2 MI-A-o N �NE �! )D°J e>oD. Q Q RA 0' ti.- ..: > - = R2 R2 xi MI M- �t :L.r C2-0- r7 D i y,/ : S L � i ij R2-0-PD R20•PD 1 0 O O R2C2-0-CD r •] c Tlia(��J:—= I fir° °°°+r )tr-�c' c� o p .` ,� R Z i Ea c� i ! C2-0—CD i� 5-0-CD R2oPo-cgN/)o�oy R2 ^� I ADAMS AVE ea I � C21 kC4 RR3 i 2 0 RA R2 I C2. i R2-0 R2 R2 <' I I R2-0 R2-0 FOIL-!foEJ-0 ooY-1 � i u N0 Loj�H ¢ N N w• O C .`[.R R2 I C4 ICI {Ei o o I N N O 0 I � ¢ ������,`,`,,'' j�� $$ R UR HRo R3-0 = AVE O m Zc- 66-1-j ANNINT • ZONING DM 6 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 6-6-10 NOTE JrNCxfgMf aRL :. .LET CITY OF ADOPTED AUGUST 17, 1960 •`. -c«E .o,axl o wL xr oL I; IMTLMO[P -o ELT[Mp Ee �:� _LNn� CITY LEGEND: COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 703 trL E mp: of r.r .MC VDCO '.]�• 'p0 W a.ICyCC] Z�xL ,� +n M J rc'ID <USWK.i�Ox CaSC =5j 0FF- 4W[CSS-0 JISTrIICT HUNTINGTON BEACH ;:;rn2 =M 9:O S-i-,2 S• -ra -•S-b 9-n i.2e IC� +Ic+r.. :orvuuc 0.1—CT o-+,2 i ae vzf , v n Is I• S2 2 Se0 SM ��5 ,2• iI.-.;<[ • o[SOC r[C OISTgCr t4• i. r. -I - I l) ' IIIIrTCO MA:RC rWM1r .[S10LMCL JIfrRC'T -63 309.frr g5e 4'4-'2 'O-Ie R)T 0— -'.T♦ 520lS )xr 9ea 5-4-)) :5-.. Ieal �w' eI.S+KV ySTRICT 5.11-V l•) )% e•4. 1l•0 Le% '.O FwiT 4E SIOC'r<L Yt'RKT O-)-•l l•e O0: ).4l r �00 !Cx[ 26G O R A v G E C O U v T Y, C L I F O R N I A ,:':Y 'q' °'• "" "' 2�BJ 4[SODI •E .ARKUL,�E a„R<T 1 +2) ow fL_� IgeIEE-OrK J:Sivr<: e..q.M ,ST IO)9 2'M •n2 �ICe � i0.R4IxrT. r•<, I'•[S I[JOC]T:OMI OISTRKT 'r22 COYYU•.). r. T I[ S'a[CRL.TIO.ALI LIST 4 KT COWO,IT♦ r.C1-T.ES:C.NC10rSTRI<T 2 21u l.• Ie) ..e.se se.t) Izzs ._- OiSITMATFf .wwTE /TRcm ;e)SEIe Te ,�oCOF-]/. JaT4rc• /T! -s e) i.le zn i� rlyao _cM[ -F" 1.7 12 :i 9 T >I l2 sS rr 5[Iryft STelgx }Si41<T •. I.W se-) I.00 e I S GA.RFIELD • j / AvE- z.r— or RI .�.'s•.M RI RA; -�t--- s a I V N R I aL9<CORE 0 -I I 'RU RI I r pro• 2 I I- �RI RI RI RI ;Rll�a lu rn 1, I LRI �F snssaR a RIu MHRI ia � I� � R3 i mo• ; ITCMFI OR R I W R I L R I ; C2 iI_ 1 ` 31 aRl Ia R� VE ARDO RI R i +ELwmO u x+ n.IN I of RI RI _,V/I 0 C. F C. D. oso I~zoo n j... �1- RAR A I g ./. ............................ _.... ................---.--CCU ..�,LR:N jeD _ •.12 U L� R I i %PEPP DR. J FLOUNDER D _ I z _II/ II _ .• WU I R I z 'a C F— E , RONNE'r OR , R w RII. 1 =IR1 RI I RI RI RI RI J RI I i Is.ILFrsM R I MH BLArc _ _ R' I I I R I R I i t I Y/ NI••rw a i RARER z TARPON OR f �-- I � R I RI o-� 'Ug RI I� RI I RI RI JL RIGRAND DR' _ C4 RI RI ; RI -- YOPKTOWN'— RI RI I RI a a RI v[ROxICA OIE i GREENWICM OR I ` ! `!3 t s •,f OLP.0 a RI g - I RI IR1 RI RI RI - RIf " RIRI rAAfILIJ M- T TM R Ox i —E VI--- POR SASgx D �IRIRI _ RI RICF—E RI ICI NANTUCKET OR ea.o g R I R! �CF-R RI r MYANNIS PORT OR. .R��i ' S COrfrITUTpr M- rAOf..NE i Ii RI RI RI gRV! RI ICF- CAPE COD OR b RI RI SE v� SE-~ SEC 5-eU GROTON OR J x..[r R7�)11 R7 R3 R3 R7 R3 I$ ^ I I Q ][TTs.00c r R7 °R P VEER R2 .R•.I 4 RRI RI RI RI 3 R3 ER IR7I 3 UR3 3 f R7 GCTYSgJG DRRII <c or -n . RI R7�rIo CRRFORD C. 7 7 4R3R7 R7 /2C4�AI ¢ NO7p¢m i �4---_ .. r:g RS ..i i S S R3 R3 ' ir� _ r r T ADAMS ZE ZC_- 6 Q- l 1 111 PLANNING a ZONING DM 11 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . 3 I NESTMINSTER 10-5-11 NOTE GN[ •JA�N•G • J[ ADO TED AUGUST 15, 1960 +r r[.ao •o n�[.o �o -1 <[::u Y ML• 4* Jr •. LEGEND= CIT• COUNCIL ONOINANCE NO. 769 .• v ci CCD[rNONNeN_ ap NEaa Onra[r AMENDED C_SE ONO. NO. AMENDED OAD n0. _ •Kiu nFa ICOK.viO+. (IIII Cr 9. 16-6i 2M 666 JCYNUNir♦ rK�u ras i.[c•[.no.ul JIsrNlcr IO- 7 - 63 363 .007 6--6-63 5C7 1116 6--3-8e as-3 2715 q I�� •I/ AVE tr Ir ILn SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY-, CALIFORNIA • NDI• O.•w•r11• a. . 4 arC DD•aD On Ip• ODd0+a4 f1N r Om RDIMiw41.04 �',In Dn•+ N//, � r .n14D.• ADAM! *$EABRIG�r;.�`- I i RI RI ce-ss SPECIFIC o i 3e �+ I?`H%(>=Tl RI RI RI ' IR1 = I 9 D I` I RI RI -01 ' u RI T •7 I' I I _ .yII -01 ; I� Il RI r; I a RI ;.I I RID. CF-R� RI - I_�14v 017 RI SCpLP(Xx yis 111 UU 3 g RI RI I �.: r :1 •_L• Ar yl C2 o r RI RI 1 MUNSTER = OR I " 4m a Ijul 3�p RI Go RI QRI 7- R I R1 �E+ YaLLOY ; OR RI } RI RI RI Y RI = RI I / INDIANAPOLIS 0 DM 13 12-6-11 D - NOTE ppO�TEJ 4uCA1571]. 1960 •�[ 1r •[[* CITY CCLfCIL- ORDINANCE .NO-79'3 AME NDEO �' ORONO. AMENOE7 ONp6( E ORO.NO_ •+. :wc •wo-+rD a+ aID„r } .n .f +rt n,^,[J D C•'[n0 r0 •[ .C+r[+ 2•B-61 14S 914 8-7-72 PP?PS 1767 J[ suc• v1Dnr .�[ •n 5-0-61 161 839 9-6-73 73-12 :662 LEGEND' 4-61 213.2:5 97- 75-4 1994 = 5-7.62 237 900 6-6. 77 77-6 2190 LLiED rJssfUrgN 9-17-62 261 923 12-16-76 76-22 2335 n•NN[D :E.ELar,aN7 D13TRKf !,J 1-21-63 500 9a6 3--6-79 79-1 MIS rE6.l0,•OOD X—E—III 316 12-3-79 316----6634 79--9 205 —[uIrrT are•+rwrf 2-'94 334 4-- 5 46 1D%25 6-19 17620 2604 crr3 :+}11Sc J a6 9 -16-65 167---- r+lEr "—.T.ES :•E'+[T-6i 0lcn: 562 1.1916495 t<o+RL - ,r6.465 531 :163 1a NRlurMrvL sLrlv Ill IE L•r10RI3-63 366 117T rr•R J,+L1"+D1 U[11I•E—D•ILs Kui.r 1_1_6766.62 1290 1 "-'DD .C,57+„CT 6-19. 8T 66-66 }30 %lU ' •• •;JOD - E -••2 9.,9.67 67-22 -349 •=1 i -CE TV - x_ •0[417.1+c DIsrRlc-f •0-19. :u 70- 0 16061 7-17-71 71-�1 '658 .._ XE ES-1—C itREETf 9-7. 71 71. 2 '65T _.._ SL •/•D4 .1R[ 12-20-71 71 -,A 1112 RI i [ 1 RI = RI R' cI R I R I REILL7 z CP CF-E RI $AIL CR RI RI RI RI I 711D cR WM I RI R I KINGFISHER _ c4 f j1 RI o RI 'RI c- RI R2-PD U a cc m RI L Nof761Ro RI RI Rl Ya: R I RI TERN CR RI HERON CR •.._• ._-�•- __ ._ -� Rl D _ CRANE CR �' •- '-. —' . , � sL� RI RI Rl RI ' a . j a F RI f' '` a — - RI RI R C4 R' ��-� RI` RI AVE PLANNING ZONING DM 17 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 15-5-11 { "� NOTE CITY OF .DD[.ro �) , �,) COVKiL ORD�RIRL[ YO ,N uN u. :MY: •41Mr.Yo • ,owr .L �. [YO[O +R [.+[-ND i 1. +0 K C[Y,[R o[ sYLY uowr aF ... LEGEND •w..co :o.[ ORONO —Noto 30Y[ l oRDYu -,O In — C] ] L[ —.1 R[LD[Y L[ o it HUNTINGTON i m { iM Qf -]-M �N N{ � n JO,QE$ '�, +{Mwi COYY[RC�K Sfiint) BEACH 04) [JNZQ {{{ 01,G UD ED •• �f ii uYR[D WLT� . Li .[]D[K[ J[i.K) TWLJ -W' b-{] 2" W 5"' COYYUYi,+ [K�uT�[f It011G„�0.1 D�„RKi ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA {" S °" } 1-N In IN 21-R z-zz-n � LDYY Yi)) ..oL) n,RR.[.i,DY.L, Da).,L) rT J � J E� LAGER 13OLSA C F AVE 1 C4-6 awii TON BE z g u z K 1 agC4 w C4 8 RI J RI RI RI J RI RI x RI e N r a = { RI as ALE%ANp31A pR a RI RI RI CORD OA RI 3 RI RI CR f PAR" CA CANTERBURi OR CLNTERBUAY OR RI RI RI OR AM CR RI RI RI CUMBERLAND DR CUMBERLAND DR L20 RI 2 RI � p_ yOREN�. R1 C� ` F C sc. DaE SDEN CR �JRI z z a 1MlIFA% rRl K. OR RI RI RI OR YELBOURNE RI ;R3 M �• RI RI RI RI ' RI C aR S g — N AVE ---- RI RI RI z RI 2 RED COACH CF-R RI RI RI F RI tl B DR v r OR 1 I RI ..., b RI RI RI CR RI RI C F— E RI BLOR DR sTa t.L::+ ;:e-.v -�_,:.;.' RI RI RI q z RI OR DR RI DR G I RI RI I RI RI z z z YEATM CR J R I SNAN[AM OR i RI RI OR ERE CR R I CORK 01[ R I RETHERFORO OR j f RI Rp CR RI I RI W GLARE DR RI BREELAND OR Z RI RIB zc ¢ c RS J tR ~ OR O RI RI RI RI 1 q RI a `� C4 C4 C4 r —� AVEJ f.J V 1 —1 DM 23 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 20-5-II NOTE CITY OF .DOPTE° OECE6/ER 5. 1960 .,, orawo,a ..a „ raa+ :� u >+a,oao ro u*a,e *o r.a u�rt■ CIT' COUNCIL OR01M6MC[ P e0s or wa �EGENO Lft AMEND CASEORI Na 6YEN0 0 CAM Ry °_NO. Q sNcl 'a T +[fc6.c[ dRwcT HUNTINGTGN BEACH sCE 6-.-62 =� 907 -2•-e3 29, 97e 66-1011 7-10-66 W261220 --- � -- i c�ln7, swz[u dsn¢T W-7-63 3971007 12-5-8666•571269 rN]1A ralo fRY[6 uR■ 'ml J - 2 - 6s79eAONG4 i 3-6.67 6642 17W -7.7 Vwmp r aµr ,[6RNCa dm■cr aa.E.D emna /. 6." 410 1045 9 -16-67 67.22 13s9 �ij - �p[p,.ah II(p(Jtoh dlrllCT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ;o-;a9 ,7 5_s°: z_„_fie ,T, r L -T-ep 79-7 2a02 .N;o" !�-BIPF6601 e9966-1-N ?20-0262-T 2575 •061059 ■-19.6•a9aAE01079 4-7-69 69-414ee 7-19-71 T091620 COMW4T nC1UT1[11[OYG+p1600TFR �$� Cd�wa,+. nt•lr■a IM[CMI.rNa1.L1 d■IICT i1-1-6262-6 25e1 7.2-Ba 6a-7 2706 11-2-6• sre 10le 12-ZO-717F20®1692 N6,f—l[ 01■T■ICT 12-7.64 set 1106 7-3-12 r1.2OE11693 Z� r -.E1o, 1 •J 16-6.! 196 1163 7-i6-7T M7-22207 '—IE oE—.In=.■ ""WE'7 I I I 6S !JO 1166 7. 3- 76 Z0. 2291 01.a—/ flame/ 1— �� 00.3— Z0M[ —M - I ED*r" AVE I • • DM 40 ';' ANNING ZONICIG j +. SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 36-5-1 I NOTE [[oT- ' ADOPTED JUNE 20. I960 : tI [.a�.)..[ .N .. jolt •c1c 1— . •� •�c.r.cr-... CITY OF wc.. �1(CMY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 7371i( LEGEND- r tm2mai !N[ a• o r•Q mun !IC➢@ r•� �I� !Orel[ rY11lV R[f10(NCl DIf T111ti MCI e10 23, f00 !� p1 O apRl.crt JdMT ' HUNTING ON BEACH •-IFei 110 /De -11-aJ zfz fre ,2� zoer >r you © MNNeF COrr1t R(YeL P1T•I�T ©o�nc[ rev[lacR.l afnecr Y/-N K]I ID'M -Y 10D I >2. ® VIeT[D M..TRl IRNIT R210[NTuI DOTRK'r -tv XO. Ali ® T,.D nrl. Rmova afnecr ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA +iOiT !Y .lfl y I. o rosT.I ua '•jllyl !-}= [-cr DtRRS 7JL] 0...K0 'J[v[Ipr[Nr a1TfIcT i*y1• I •e-1? [iQ[ iTe 1f Ylryr(1 aTRly plfTle(:T feQrT rib #TYCe II NE _q.nM b1 Wa A -e-n the 1lD6 w®1[ RM (I 191 .uRrrINT ' = ~TE 1TeQi to :a mn mTx Il-zl-n ne :z.o o-il-ae sD-II ifD] to fa aue TALBERT u v AVENUE J\ L II , L 1 T 1O° I RI ERI RI RI C 4 C F- E p .DTS .vE a t•a- .:cxscnxu RI RI RI RI 0 0 m RI T RIING AVENUE RI 1�:�•��1-v P•'e i: RI 3 RI RI RI-PD KIN R • uN[R fV RI RI t DR l[ :oKrtRl o• �'��' ,Jj iR2 : RI RI RI RI-PD.3#, j a R3 ER3 "'"O'�f% 4 , R j I R2 RI aR Rl- I-PD � — �RI b RI RI 9 i R2: ` R2 �R2 r -'ARI R3 R3 = C4 R2-� j R3 R R3 = � R3 MH RZ R2 Lj R3 •••[' I R3 R3 C4R2 ' R3 I ifur.00D v D" w _ y- D• R3 -R3 .;�? 6 RI fNTU1E' R I 66 RI R3 R3 . RI CA $ RI R2 R2 _RI RI • RI R ii GARFIELD 0 2 0 W z a AVENUE Publish June 3, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC- HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO 86-17 SERVICE STATION SUFFIXES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing'in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, June 16, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: LOCATION: City-wide 0 Zone Change No. 86-17 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPOSAL: To delete the -SS suffix on each site where it appears on the sectional district maps as a follow-up to Code Amendment 86-8 which repealed the -SS provisions from the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington. Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia 9. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated.: May 28, 1986 D-2, I� NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM TO: CI Y CLERK'W ICE DATE: FROM: PLEASE S/CHEW LE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE (O DAY OF 198 AP's are: attached AP's will follow Initiated by: PJ- narfi ing_CommissiotY Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO informed of forthcoming public hearing? Refer to Planning Department - Extension # S Z� for additional information-. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-17 Service Station Suffixes NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: May 20, 1986 - 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Chanae No. 86-17 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach REQUEST: To delete the -SS suffix on each site where it appears on the sectional district maps as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the -SS provisions from the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission (5072d-3) Publish June 3, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO 86-17 SERVICE STATION SUFFIXES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, June 16, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: LOCATION: City-wide Zone Change No. 86-17 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPOSAL: To delete the -SS suffix on each site where it appears on the sectional district maps as a follow-up to Code Amendment 86-8 which repealed the -SS provisions from the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. EN TRoNHENTAL, STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. A11 applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: May 28, 1986 4 Ae;Adnzed to !'publish hcivertlsemerit3 of s ° s including public notices Qy Decree of the Superior. Cour`rf Orange County. Caidornla, Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961. and A-2-0631, dated. I I June, 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange PubnC Not,CU na.vlttwna Co..tillid by this 0"16wi1 is ,Mt in i point with 10 plcs Column vr.dth I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid-, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS. a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of July 4 , 198 6 , 198 ,.198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. uted on July 4 , 198 6 (=7 ifornia. ignature ki 4tj. tL ..- :• 1 'V , PROOF OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTI! J - 1 C NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE I_ PUBLIC NOTICE , ?UBLIC NOTICE 1`146ftE OF PUBLIC 10ARI ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be change to the zone indicated. This is a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-6 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Change No. Location 86-10 Northwest corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Zone Change To Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone C1 C1 C1 C1 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 __I Dated: July 1, 1986 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot July 4, 1986 F707 - _ .ter„ . 4 CITY OF HUNTING�ON BEACH REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES 5e p. White City Attorney Canary City Clerk Pink City Administrator Goldenrod Departmental DS 86-84 Date Request Made By Department July' 22, 1986 James W. P#lin Development Services INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Attorney's Office as soon as possible. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney. Out- line briefly reasons for the request. Attach all information and exhibits pertinent to the subject. Type of Legal Service Requested: k* Ordinance [ ] Insurance (] Other (] Resolution [ ] Bonds (] Contract/Agreement ( 1 Opinion All exhibits must be attached, or this request will be returned to you. IC# Exhibits Attached An a result of Council action July 21, 1986, the attached ordinance needs to be modified prior to second reading. Zonal Change No. 86-12 will be from C3 to Cl. Zone Change No. 86-16 will be from (WC3 to C2. Should you have any questions, pleas* contact Jeff Abramowitz of my staff. . If for Council Action, Agenda deadline If not for Council action, desired completion date Siggafyi F Council meeting August 40 1986i PID 12/79 REQUES , FOR CITY COUNCIL C ION ce,� Date July 21, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-10 THROUGH NO. 86-16 Consistent with Council Policy? XYes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: -?U STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Code Amendment No. 86-8 streamlined the commercial district regulations and eliminated the C3 District, which had applied to only seven sites within the City. As listed in the Analysis section of this report, four of the sites are proposed to be changed to Cl, Neighborhood Commercial District; the remaining three sites contain existing residential uses and are proposed to be Oldtown Specific Plan -District 1 in accord with surrounding properties. (District Maps 10 and 12 are attached.) To meet public notice requirements, a one -quarter page ad describing the proposed zone changes was published in the newspaper and all owners of the affected properties were mailed a public notice and cover letter explaining the need for the zone changes. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation: ON MOTION BY,LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY PORTER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-10 THROUGH NO. 86-1b AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-26 AND ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-16 AND ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN: None. PIO 4/84 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The proposed zone changes are consistent with the Planning Commission and City Council action on Code Amendment No. 86-8. 2. The proposed zone changes are consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. ANAT.YS T S The locations proposed to be changed are as follows: Zone Change No. Location Change To 86-10 NWC Delaware/Frankfort 86-11 NEC Delaware/Frankfort 86-12 SWC Delaware/Frankfort 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh 86-14 SWC Orange/Eleventh 86-15 SEC Orange/Eleventh 86-16 NWC Olive/Seventeenth Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone Cl Cl C1 Cl For those sites which currently contain commercial uses (Zone Change Nos. 86-14, 15, & 16), the Cl District is the most appropriate designation, allowing limited retail/office uses. The three small commercial sites do have a general plan designation of medium density residential; however they are not considered inconsistent with the General Plan since they are under one acre in size. In the case of Zone Change No. 86-16, for the site at Olive and Seventeenth which currently is zoned (Q)C3, staff has research the original "Q" conditions and determined that all have been met. The two conditions were that vehicular access be dedicated on Seventeenth Street, and that a use permit be filed for any development of the site. Since a convenience market is currently under construction at the site and the Q requirements have been met, there is no need to carry the "Q" over with the new Cl designation. The three corner sites at Frankfort Avenue and Delaware Street (Zone Change Nos. 86-10, 11, & 12) contain residential uses, have a General Plan designation of residential, and are completely surrounded by the Oldtown Specific Plan in which they will be incorporated. RCA - July 21, 1986 -2- (5506d) Finally, for the ten contiguous parcels fronting on Main Street between Seventh Street and Acacia Avenue (Zone Change No. 86-13) which include both commercial and residential uses, it is proposed that the Cl designation be used at this time. Since the General Plan Land Use Map shows General Commercial, a zone change from C3 to Cl will be consistent and involve the least change. A decision could still be made in the future to change the zoning and general plan designation to residential for some of these lots. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-26 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on the zone changes, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-26. FUNDING: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Zone Change 86-10 - 86-16 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. District Maps 10 and 12 3. Negative Declaration No. 86-26 4. Planning Commission Staff Report JVJWP:JA:pb dated 6/3/86 RCA - July 21, 1986 -3- (5506d) ACITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INSTUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAt, I. BACKGROUND 1. Applicant City of Huntington Beach 2. Address 2000 Main Street __ 3. Telephone - 4. Project Location NWC.NEC.& SWC of Delaware/Frankfort, rang nth 5. Project Title/Description Ch n e z e from C3 to zone i eenth 6. Date May 15, 1986 -M Oat e� :n._ 1I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical, Yes Maybe No �/ Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No 3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, police, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No �/ 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No 5. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities, natural resources, human health? Yes Maybe No 6. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). III. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( V ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No V/ 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No ./ 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No V/ 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly% Yes Maybe No V. DETERMINATION ( �) Negative Declaration ( } Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report DATE �� l SIGNATURE huntington beach development services department STAf f TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT• ZONE: REQUEST: LOCATTONS-_ Zone Change No. 86-10 86-11 86-12 86-13 86-14 86-15 86-16 EPOR Planning Commission Development Services June 3, 1986 ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-20 THROUGH 86-16/i+I&*rtvc o6r-LAtAnoA1 No. of -I& City of Huntington Beach DATE ACCEPTED: 4/30/86 C3 (General Business MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: District) To change the following locations from C3 to the district indicated as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the C3 District provisions. r ^-�}; -- NWC Delaware/Frankfort NEC Delaware/Frankfort SWC Delaware/Frankfort Main Street/Acacia/Seventh SWC Orange/Eleventh SEC Orange/Eleventh NWC Olive/Seventeenth 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Change To Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 C1 Cl C1 C1 Approve Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 based on the findings outlined in this report and recommend adoption to the City Council. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Code Amendment No. 86-8 streamlined the commercial district regulations and eliminated the C3 District, applied only to seven sites within the City. As listed above, four of the sites are proposed to be changed to Cl, Neighborhood Commercial District; the remaining three sites contain existing residential uses and are proposed to be Oldtown Specific Plan -District 1 in accord with surrounding properties. (District Maps 10 and 12 are attached.) A-F M43A To meet public notice requirements, a one -quarter page ad describing the proposed zone changes was published in the newspaper and all owners of the affected properties were mailed a public notice and cover letter explaining the need for the zone changes. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-26 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on the zone changes, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-26. 4.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: For those sites which currently contain commercial uses (Zone Change Nos. 86-14, 15, & 16), the C1 District is the most appropriate designation, allowing limited retail/office uses. The three small commercial sites do have a general plan designation of medium density residential; however they are not considered inconsistent with the General Plan since they are under one acre in size. In the case of Zone Change No. 86-16, for the site at Olive and Seventeenth which currently is zoned (Q)C3, staff has research the original "Q" conditions and determined that all have been met. The two conditions were that vehicular access be dedicated on Seventeenth Street, and that a use permit be filed for any development of the site. Since a convenience market is currently under construction at the site and the Q requirements have been met, there is no need to carry the "Q" over with the new Cl designation. The three corner sites at Frankfort Avenue and Delaware Street (Zone Change Nos. 86-10, 11, & 12) contain residential uses, have a General Plan designation of residential, and are completely surrounded by the Oldtown Specific Plan in which they will be incorporated. Finally, for the ten contiguous parcels fronting on Main Street between Seventh Street and Acacia Avenue (Zone Change No. 86-13) which include both commercial and residential uses, it is proposed that the Cl designation be used at this time. Since the General Plan Land Use Map shows General Commercial, a zone change from C3 to Cl will be consistent and involve the least change. A decision could still be made in the future to change the zoning and general plan designation to residential for some of these lots. 5.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed zone changes are consistent with the Planning Commission and City Council action on Code Amendment No. 86-8. Staff Report - 6/3/86 -2- (5268d) 2. The proposed zone changes are consistent with the City's General Plan of Land Use. ATTACHMENTS: 1. District Maps 10 and 12 2. Draft Ordinance JWP:JA:kla Staff Report - 6/3/86 -3- (5268d) PUBLIC NOTICE IL PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBLIC NOTICE I PUBUC NOTICE- . I PUBLIC TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be change to the zone indicated. This is a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-6 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Change No. Location 86-10 Northwest corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Zone Change To Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone C1 C1 C1 C1 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: July 1, 1986 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot July 4, 1986 F707 Aut-horized to,Publrsh Advertisements ofJf�6t s m!:ludiny public Kotrces by C'ecree o+ the Superior CoOrange Coumy. California, Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961_ and A-2483 t dated t t June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange o,.b„c Nonce ♦d+enrarry cowed Or r11,a amdwn -f W -n r "M win to prca co u~ Orr+ I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS. a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published In the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of July 4 198 6 198 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on Tuly 4 , egg 6 at osta Mesa, California. Signature t PROOF OF PUBLICATION Publisr 6/24/&6 ' _ 'yam ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING — ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public Nearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 '.lain Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 7, 1986 TLIS: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION N IBER : Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be changed to the zone indicated. This is as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-3 which repealed the C3 District provisions. %one Zone Chance No. &Q,-;t7 Location Change -o 86-i0 Northeas corner Del aware/=rankfort Oldtown, District 1 86-�1 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort Oidtown, District 1 36-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh Cl Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh C1 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh C1 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Cl ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL Pi-_ZRESTZD PERSONS are invitee to attenc saia :searing ana express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. >11 applications, es ibits, and descriptions of t::is proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 :lain Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CI_Y COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: June 19, 1986 June 30, 1986 DUE TO A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT, IT IS NECESSARY FOR US TO REPUBLISH THE ATTACHED PUBLIC HEARING AND TO RESCHEDULE IT FOR JULY 21, 1986. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH F 0 TWA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK June 30, 1986 CALIFORNIA 92648 DUE TO A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT, IT IS NECESSARY FOR US TO REPUBLISH THE ATTACHED PUBLIC HEARING AND TO RESCHEDULE IT FOR JULY 21, 1986. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ( Telephone: 714-536.5227 ) • Publilp 6/24/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NCT.:CT- IS H—FER?3Y G1'J-_N that the Huntington Beach City Ccuncil will hold a ;public nearing in the Ccuccil Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 wain Street, :iuntiagton Beach, Caiifor :ia, on the date and at t^e time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DALE: Monday, July /, 1986 TT_ME: 7:30 P.M. A?PTICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be changed to the zone indicated. This is as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Zone Change Ao. UsAjit:�' Location Chance To 36-10 Northam corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District I 2e-I Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 36-12 Southwest corner Delaware,'Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh Cl 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh C1 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Cl ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of Development Services.. ALL INTMESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said rearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. A11 applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: June 19, 1986 c�h Publis6/24/86 ' P � NOTICE OF Pi7BLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Cit7 Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 7, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be changed to the zone indicated. This is as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Zone Change No, &4,; ' Location Change To 86-10 NorthearA corner Delaware/Frankfort 01-dtown, District 1 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 86-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 Coastal Zone 86-13 Main. Street/Acacia/Seventh Cl 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Cl ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance -and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of.Development Services: A.;...L INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits; and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: June 19, 1986 r! NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ZpNt cr4AN4•E, k36-/� ��fo-ATi�� %19-C-9.AitA-r!sN NO.eii•� (pl TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. DATE: �+ FROM: 1 PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF 198 p AP's are: atta ed /oivs need /y ad AP's will follow No AP's C�.�� .�?�.�,�-�.---� - ��.���° � � oaf ���`�"�� �• .1, . Initiated by: Planning_Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal IN rj 26 Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) Has City Attorney's Office been informed of forthcoming public hearing? Refer to � Planning Department - Extension # S z.7I for additional information-. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. _ I DATE/TIME: �Tr2-'�-, 1986 - 7:00 PM - APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION That the following locations currently zoned C3 be AND REQUEST: changed to the zone indicated. This is as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Zone Change No. Location pid►vw,\ Change To —66 10 Northwest corner Delaware/Frankfort Tit, District 1 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort �� , District 1 86-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort did, District 1- 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh Clsi2 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth s ci 4 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will is 4 b LL u prior to action on the above zone changes. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission (5200d-3) Lc 6(V-10 ZC- 24-242-04 24-213-06 24-095-03 Pearl Conklin Fern Gisler Roy Smith 501 Frankfort Avenue 1009 13th. Street 627 7th. Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 24-095-04 L C 96• 15 24-095-05 Z C. 9(0' t 3 24-095-06 z c d 3 Pacific View Memorial Park Curtis Barnes Karen Ahrens 3500 Pacific View Dr. Rt. 1678 2550 Rd. 1731 Park Street P.O. Box 1936 Cedaredge, CO 81413 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 92663 24-095-07 z L 196• 15 24-095-08 Lc 24-095-09 Joseph DeSues Zola Barry Robert Allen 609 Main Street 607 Main Street P.O. Box 610 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 24-095-10 Zc �3 23-156-15 Lr- gb' (6 24-156-16 L c 86•/: Victoria Lane Paul Columbus Adel Zeidan 637 Frankfort Avenue 614 llth. Street 13382 Patterson Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 24-111-01 2 c g+' 1 S 24-027-09 2C 8fb -I Y 24-221-01 Majid Harb Jamil Gammoh Patrick Gillespie 327 llth. Street 7301 Emerson Ave. 517 Delaware St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Westminister, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 24-221-02 2C 6b•f� Chris Taylor 1840 Pine Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Publisi 6/24/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10 THROUGH 86-16 Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GI1V7_N that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 7, 1986 TI'_KE: 7:30 P.M. A2PLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be changed to the zone indicated. This is as a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-8 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Zone Change No. Location Change To 86-10 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 86-12 Southwest corner Delaware/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh Cl 86-14 Southwest corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-15 Southeast corner Orange/Eleventh Cl 86-16 Northwest corner Olive/Seventeenth Cl ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in conjunction with the above zone changes. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. -4,11 applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: June 19, 1986 t ZONE CHANGE NOS. 86-10. THROUGH 86-y6 y} Deletion of C3 Districts NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach.'City.Council will hold a ' public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main. Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at, the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 7, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change Nos. 86-10 through 86-16 PROPOSAL: That the following locations currently zoned C3 be change to the zone indicated. This is a follow-up to Code A ndment No. 86-6 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Zone Change No. Location Change To 86-10 Northeast corner Delaware/ fort Oldtown, District 1 86-11 Northeast corner Delaware/ rankfort Oldtown, District 1 86-12 Southw/orner la re/Frankfort Oldtown, District 1 - Coastal Zone 86-13 Main Seventh C1 86-14 Southwange/Eleventh C-1 86-15 Southeange/Eleventh C1 86-16 Northwive/Seventeenth C1 ENVIRONMENTAJC STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-26 will also be considered in co junction with the above zone changes ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance and legal descriptions are on file in the Departm nt of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions oar submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk,.2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public: HUNTIN,GTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth; ' C ty blerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated. Ju'ne 1'k 1,98,6 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot June 25, 1986 W503c ._Awtl,ori:ed lo,Pubtlsh Advertisements of aft A rnctudinp pubho r� • notices by Decree of the Superior Court -VI Orange County - California. Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961. and A-24831. dated 11 June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange pum ,01WA nownwq coww by 11w M110btl1 is w M r po1111 iM1n 10 PIN cok mn w10111 I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter 1 am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published In the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME consecutive weeks to wit the isaue(s) of June. 25 , 1986 , 198 , 198 . , 198 , 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. On June •26 6 198 _ Mesa, California. P_ ROOF OF PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO. 2856 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF DISTRICT MAPS 10 AND 12 TO CHANGE ALL C3 DISTRICTS TO Cl, C2 AND OLDTOWN (ZONE CHANGES 86-10, 86-11, 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 AND 86-16) WHEREAS, pursuant to the state planning and zoning law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and the Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case Numbers 86-10, 86-11, 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 and 86-16, wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that each zone change is proper and consistent with the General Plan NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the.City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following described real properties on District Map Numbers 10 and 12 currently zoned C-3 (General Business) shall be changed to C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial), C2 (General Business District) and Oldtown Specific Plan, District One, as specified: ZONE CASE 86-10 (C3 to Oldtown Specific Plan) ZONI CASE 86-11 (C3 to Oldtown Specific Plan) ZC 86-10 - 86-16 Lots 1 and 2 of Block 604, of Vista del Mar Tract as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 5, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. Lots 19 and 20 of Block 605, of Vista del Mar Tract as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 5, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. � I 1. ZONE CASE 86-12 Lots 9 and 10 of Block 504, of Vista del Mar (C3 to Cl) Tract as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 5, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. ZONE CASE 86-13 Lots 1-13 inclusive of Block 606, Huntington (C3 to Cl) Beach, Main Street Section, as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, Page 43, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. ZONE CASE 86-14 Lots 25 and 27 of Block 311, Huntington Beach (C3 to Cl) Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, Page 36, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. ZONE CASE 86-15 Lots 26 and 28 of Block 310, Huntington Beach (C3 to Cl) Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, Page 36, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County. ZONE CASE 86-16 Lots 1, 3, 5 and 7 of Block 317, Huntington ((Q) C3 to C2) Beach, Seventeenth Street Section, as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 10, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County.. NO FURTHER TEXT ON THIS PAGE ZC 86-10 - 86-16 2. • SECTION 2. The Development Services Director is hereby .:j directed to amend Section 9061, District Map Numbers 10 and 12 (Sectional District Maps 10-6-11 and 11-6-11) to reflect Zone Case Numbers 86-10, 86-11, 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 and 86-16, described in Section 1 hereof. Copies of said district maps, as amended hereby, are available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August , 1986. Vol, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Administrat r � INITIATED AND APPROVED ZC 86-10 - 86-16 3. LANWRG * ZONING s SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP II-6-II • ADOPTED m•.Cr T. rffO c1TT COUNCIL O.DIM A%CE MC- Tjt CITY OF a+ .-t-t• i nt 1)-t. +sx fps e•T-Y m fon teT •fQr.p frl Q-,-Y tf: fl +1-)e w•e tot HUNTINGTON BEACH -e-M trrt m oet• is (w -t-C Yya n[la T-Q [ry ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R-.•..: Q. wwwwr,n r.-t• N-rt tw ebn ...+re rft . t-r •>. rp Tyc Ate e•a �-.-te err ee .�.•t.-..w+w..l fOR N/: QR •-t-• •-• t•K Ov A-t Qp Ortytt,,� �Q�yy}t�t� }ttrt�.L..•WN•f�• raon +ra rr• r)- by r+X ADAMS AVE re-+• na nr. l - V LI I_I LJLU UU tIUt I l I L 1 L I t�•—� ' I R-I z \ � f 7 RI RI ❑I RI yC4II I1 ORi�j! RI R�I I I I�rl •�� lF CF E . 1 rats. <__-•_• 1 //R I R to • OW fccrt. •r: DM 12 LEGEND: � Oua.I(D t-ts�Td 'Q 1pltR ADM Wee �—mnT► nn fato.r. ���1\1it01aw HOIK .\r (� Mn.t .• .taror.Y Mt).KT a� w.tr..• IItw tm M•TK' J.RIC —'+ . I_. tt•me mT..C+ rl.l+.,t .tr..-.eSwr M -4' teat— ws. s. MI.c+ 3G 't t.c.ut.r encuc• ttr..lMr++.t(i Rr[A[(11[t•gY_•!.d<r1C !� Com—" geaRlta ttouue.wu_J r+ A� tn.0 w. nss—r mTK' (� MNO..O(C t:000[a.t. mint- St wr...m M.aMcas at+..n ..qw�• Q Qt It, mcal .. d e+.err ar Tfnf LM — C ^onto �+• a. -0.x•— a• fou.ot r- r tt.. --�:-v rR D. M . fiVT.R[e nr a' a w.trtu vt a tn. J I•trw—r o.n l L 1 C2 it -r r i I °• I (DISTRICT ZI •1 .• I G RF Rl RI RI UR11L RI R -0 I-.II-G J ..la E[.Rn os+Oc AVE_ •vE I RY-rD-lo /\ R I R I I��I-0 nil R2-PD-aI:+RI RI R ; � �� _.. . I R L \ o Nt5—V LI AVI i 11 lE i I! t --'a - = ST- R2-PD-q I Pi RI ~CF_R PLAN(DI �RICT TWO) I Ir e__:::__ C� F R` [r[v[wir rr MflDl W RISTH� DI_J �I•v I R C4 f _ i 3 RI R21� Ri R2 RI \R2 Nl � I D_.I DL LJ�f DDI I _ L RI ROc RIr RIII � I tv__IO • \T_ i I i I I ! II I IR3I R3I" RD:C�I ` R2 I [;�_ t R3 R2\ \R2 \ R!I =I PolVME)T'�I '1 R31CaI c � jI �''� 's�' R 3 `11R3 E �I I� U I I�� I �� • 11/ % //r•« I U I. ATLANTA IJ L JI 1 L �sL_I n 1 I MH , � f, , •�t I I is R2-PD-CZ I i I � . � :Ef .:Lra• � - I Nor I Fwo •" O 5 .j R2-CZ FL-... R2 Rp CZ R2 PD-CZ - AVE I au.l ..t[' `• NGTE ..: O.Y[.ftM.i till M feel tl.+ TOM tD,q.MIIF Y+ ntr+ d M+ s wen= n t w, Tt In Q.ITp d S.C. n dew 19DAILY PILOT _ PUBLISH .DATE 3�; LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. 2856 "AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF DISTRICT MAPS 10 AND 12 TO CHANGE ALL C3 DISTRICTS TO Cl, C2 AND OLDTOWN (ZONE CHANGES 86-10, 86-11, 86-12, 86-13, 86-14, 86-15 AND 86-16)" 3rgopt I Ordinance No. 2856 amends S. 9061 to provide for change of District Maps 10 and 12 to change all C3 Districts to Cl, C2 and Oldtown. Said ordinance provides that the following locations currently zoned C3 be changed to the zone indicated. • This is a follow-up to Code Amendment No. 86-6 which repealed the C3 District provisions. Zone Change NO. 86-10-N/W corner Delaware/Frankfort to Oldtown Specific Plan Dis. Zone Change NO. 86-11 N/E corner Delaware/Frankfort to Oldtown Specific Plan Dis. Zone Change NO. 86-12-S/W corner Delaware/Frankfort to C1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone Change NO. 86-13 Main Street/Acacia/Seventh to C1 (Neighborhood Commercial) Zone Change NO. 86-14-S/W corner Orange/Eleventh to C1 (Neighborhood Commercial) Zone Change NO. 86-15-5/E corner Orange/Eleventh to Cl (Neighborhood Commercial) Zone Change NO. 86-16-N/W corner Olive/Seventeenth to C2 (General Business District THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an regular meeting held Monday, August 18, 1986 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Kelly City of Huntington Beach Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk PLANNING a ZONING DM 10 9- 6- I I a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-II CITY OF .".n° W..DI n•° GTt COWICIL OIIpMU1C[ MO. ". .n."C K- W - 'E !�1' tow cm( Qjv4Q HUNTII�GTON BEACH r) � .-•_,T ..,� ear n-s w :p» r-n•M rn )-r •• � T..n .rover Iv. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA31 i-Y TTa LEGEND: r aott[lte Dff 11' ® cwlT ran a . (�aYIItD 4YfOUTpY I [. •T 10p�1•IrT♦ I•QR!/1[OOLlrtat•LlOR/K' �rOtYt/T♦ NIO1nf1t4oR•+o41D�*1/C1 Dn f•MlE [ t K/�OEYCL /1R/�C+ Q +.D r•O tV YE/.D[KI em/tn cm "."go YYITMIE r•otl• DE/1EEKl 6-/1/11 YYlT1R[ /••t�lT ■[/�O[K[ •R/1[T a /[Y[/•l •O/rY[/) Dn1w. ftg1 Y.QDr CO *C— DOTF[t c: car•tw+. ft eu wgR trll LEGEND L'Z-� cD•u�vD m o�: YYoouc*roY COral[ tnY Ot, nY000CTtp. ••tlr Fes! R o• tw. azu •a aY n. / sr vER.n a py- DEYu••+l) -K= I- V Rom[- —K, DOte/[L YR. Q• w1mCTp l -- co•s•: ron Dwno.Y� yt �IRrG•R4C J .� TOD•Eo- -- Rau RM M♦ Oy tento.•r•� c me Nc'E r. /.YCY/s) •Yl . nn • rnYt •oruYY�. • /wrt o• r 6 iY'[tp(L TC E/T[YL TD Te nNr/ O` vCw YAK M N` Ord. ', o. 2856 a- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of July 19 86, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August , 19 86 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Bailey, Green, Thomas ` NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Kelly City Clerk and ex-officio Cler of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, Califorriia, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, 1961. and A-24831, dated 11 June, 1963. STAT'L OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange PUNK KOWA Advenuuq Co ad by 1:6 afedewt is aM a1 7 POIN with 10 PKa CokUnn width I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the .NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice Of PUBLIC •HEAHTNr: of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 m e consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of APX i 1 •2 4 6 198 198 , 198 198 198 I declare, under penally of perjury, that the foregoing is true and dorrect. Executed on Aprill 25 1198 6 .-,-at`"Cdsta Mesa, California. Signature �G 1. PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINd ZONE CHANGE NO.88-7 NOTICE IS HERESx GIVEN that the Huntingtod Beech City Council will hold ja public hearing In the Coun- !oil Chamber at the Hunt- lington Beach Chic Center, ,2000 Main Street, Hunt- `ington Beach, California, on the date and at the time In - consider the statements of all pereons who wish to' be heard relative to the appll- !cation described below. DATE: Monday, May 5, �1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: ,Zone Change No. 86-7 LOCATION: 16852 and IN062 Boise Chloe Street (east side approximately 800 Ifeet north of Warner Av- enue. PROPOSAL: A request for �a change of zone from (0) C4 hway Com- �(Qualified erolal) ndlgC4 (Highway Commerolal) to R2 (Medium (Density Residential). ENVIRONMENTAL ;STATUS: Negative Declar- ation No. 88-10 assessing .the environmental effects of 'said zone change will also be iconsidered by the City Council. ON FILE: A copy of the iproposed zone change and Negative Declaration are on file In the City Clerk's Office. ALL INTERESTED PER - APPROVED BY CITY SONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal , are on file with the Office of 'the City Clerk, 2000 Main StreetHuntington Beach. California, for Inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, By: Allele M. Wentworth, City Clark, Phone (714) 6864M Published Orange Coast Daly Pilot April 24, 1986 Th856 aw �� UNCIL I Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: REQUES a FOR CITY COUNCIL -ACTION.GpuNGIL pVED BY CITY Date i ay 5, 1986 r Honorable Mayor and City Council Charles W. Thompson, City Administrate l/ - James W. Palin, Director, Development Services ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-7/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-10 crry Consistent with Council Policy? N1 Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception ®?D "Z'H3 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No. 86-7/Negative Declaration No. 86-10, a request to rezone two one -acre parcels from (Q)C4, Qualified -Highway Commercial, and C4, Highway Commercial, to R2, Medium Density Residential for the purpose of constructing apartments. The subject properties are located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 800 feet north of Warner Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and the staff recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 86-7 from (Q)C4 (Qualified -Highway Commercial) and C4 (Highway Commercial) to (Q)R2 (Qualified -Medium Density Residential), by adoption of the attached ordinance and Negative Declaration No. 86-10. Planning Commission action on April 15, 1986: ON MOTION BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-7 WITH A "Q" PREFIX AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-10 WERE APPROVED WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Erskine, Livengood, Mirjahangir, Porter, Rowe NOES: Winchell ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject properties as Medium Density Residential, therefore the requested zone change is consistent with the General Plan. 2. Residential development of the subject property will be compatible with surrounding land uses. PIO 4/84 h 3. The Qualified Classification will assure a development more compatible with the surrounding properties. CONDITION OF THE "Q": 1. The two subject properties shall be developed as an integrated development, either in the form of a large project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac street. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting a redesignation of two one -acre parcels of land, owned by the same individual, from (Q)C4, Highway Commercial, and C4, Highway Commercial, to R2, Medium Density Residential, to accommodate multiple family residential units, similar to the northerly abutting apartment project currently under construction by the applicant. Directly to the south of the subject properties is an existing office development on property zoned C2, Community Business District. To the east lies two similar one -acre parcels containing one single family residence zoned R2; recycling of these parcels to multiple family residential is anticipated. The subject properties themselves are in a transitional state since no recent development has occurred on them and they are underutilized. Staff feels that the zone change would be appropriate for the subject properties based on the surrounding development patterns, land uses, zoning classifications, general plan land use designations and the fact that Bolsa Chica Street is an arterial highway. Since there are two lots within the proposed zone change area, each lot could be developed independent of the other. The Q" is recommended so that the two lots will be developed as an integrated unit, either as one large project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac street as proposed by the applicant. The requirement for lot consolidation currently exists as the primary purpose of the "Q" of the existing (Q)C4 zoning on the northerly parcel. However, if the zone change is approved without carrying over the "Q", then the two lots could be developed independently of one another. A more desirable development would occur if the two lots are integrated based on the size of each lot and proximity to Bolsa Chica Street. Medium Density Residential is the General Plan Land Use designation for the subject properties. Therefore, rezoning these properties to R2 will bring them in conformance with the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-10 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be adopted. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-7, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-10. RCA - 5/5/86 -2- (4760d) • • FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider denying the request for R2 zoning, which would allow the site to develop as commercial, based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Rezoning the subject properties to residential uses is not compatible with surrounding land uses, mainly the southerly commercial development. 2. The existing commercial zoning is considered the highest and best use of the land. � TT1 �1T /T11 Tf1 _ 1. Ordinance 2. Staff report dated 4/15/86 JWP:SH:kla RCA - 5/5/86 -3- (4760d) • • 01 huntington beach development services department STA F SPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: April 15, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-7/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-10 APPLICANT: J. T. Moody/Ken Moody DATE ACCEPTED: 4641 Los Patos April 7, 1986 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 OWNER: Robert Curtis 4952 Warner Ave., Ste. 300 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 REQUEST: A change of zone from (Q)C4 and C4 to R2. LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa Chica ACREAGE: 2 gross acres 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: June 6, 1986 EXISTING ZONING: (Q)C4 and C4 GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential EXISTING USE: Constructor's yard and single family residence Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-7 from (Q)C4 (Qualified -Highway Commercial) and C4 (Highway Commercial) to (Q)R2 (Qualified -Medium Density Residential), and Negative Declaration No. 86-10 based on the findings and conditions of approval outlined in this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-7 is a request to rezone two one -acre parcels on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street approximately 800 feet north of Warner Avenue from (Q)C4, Qualified Highway Commercial and C4, Highway Commercial to R2, Medium Density Residential. The southerly parcel was rezoned to C4 from R2 in 1972; the northerly parcel was rezoned to (Q)C4 from R2 in 1980. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: (Q)C4 and C4 LAND USE: Contractor's yard and single family re;&i k, 1�-S4 - AV C-19 A-FM-23A •North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 LAND USE: Apartments East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Medium Density Residential R2 Residential General Commercial C2 Office Medium Density Residential R3 Residential •Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-10 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-7, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-10. • 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.n SUBDTVISTON COMMTTTF.F! Not applicable. Staff Report - 4/15/86 -2- (4647d) 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting a redesignation of two one -acre parcels of land, owned by the same individual, from (Q)C4, Highway Commercial, and C4, Highway Commercial, to R2, Medium Density Residential, to accommodate multiple family residential units, similar to the northerly abutting apartment project currently under construction by the applicant. Directly to the south of the subject properties is an existing office development on property zoned C2, Community Business District. To the east lies two similar one -acre .parcels containing one single family residence zoned R2; recycling of these parcels to multiple family residential is anticipated. The subject properties themselves are in a transitional state since no recent development has occurred on them and they are underutilized. For informational purposes, two conceptual subdivision layouts have been submitted indicating how the subject area might be divided. Each one shows eight lots surrounding a cul-de-sac street, affording 30 apartment units. One layout depicts the cul-de-sac as a logical southerly extension of Moody Circle to the north, a recently approved multiple family residential subdivision presently under construction. The other shows a short cul-de-sac projecting easterly from Bolsa Chica creating a separate development, independent of the northerly development. The merits of each design and concerns regarding traffic and circulation will be addressed in detail later during the tentative tract review process. Medium Density Residential is the General Plan Land Use designation for the subject properties. Therefore, rezoning these properties to R2 will bring them in conformance with the General Plan. Staff feels that the zone change would be appropriate for the subject properties based on the surrounding development patterns, land uses, zoning classifications, general plan land use designations and the fact that Bolsa Chica Street is an arterial highway. Since there are two lots within the proposed zone change area, each lot could be developed independent of the other. Staff's view is that the two lots should be developed as an integrated unit, either one large project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac street as proposed by the applicant. As part of staff's recommendation, a qualified classification zone change to (Q)R2, Qualified Medium Density Residential, is suggested to assure an integrated development. The requirement for lot consolidation currently exists as the primary purpose of the "Q" of the existing (Q)C4 zoning on the northerly parcel. However, if the zone change is approved without carrying over the "Q", then the two lots could be developed independently of one another. A more desirable development would occur if integrated based on the size of the lots and proximity to Bolsa Chica Street. • Staff Report - 4/15/86 -3- (4647d) •10.0 RECOMMENDATION: . Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-7 from (Q)C4 (Qualified -Highway Commercial) and C4 (Highway Commercial) to (Q)R2 (Qualified -Medium Density Residential), and Negative Declaration No. 86-10 and recommend approval to the City Council based on the following findings and conditions of approval: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject properties as Medium Density Residential, therefore the requested zone change is consistent with the General Plan. 2. Residential development of the subject property will be compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. The Qualified Classification will assure a development more compatible with the surrounding properties. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. The two subject properties shall be developed as an integrated development, either in the form of a large project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac street. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Deny Zone Change No. 86-7 based on the following findings: • FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1. Rezoning the subject properties to residential uses is not compatible with surrounding land uses, mainly the southerly commercial development. 2. The existing commercial zoning is considered the highest and best use of the land. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map 2. Conceptual Subdivision Layout - Alternative A 3. Conceptual Subdivision Layout - Alternative B 4. Negative Declaration No. 86-10 5. Draft Ordinance JWP:SHH�:kla ON Staff Report - 4/15/86 -4- (4647d) WrMIGTON WACN HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION 0 • Ad 4 0 1 0-2,irli Nuwrwcm To Scott Hess 0ITV 'OF MVNTINGTON SUACN INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION FTom ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE LSECIARATION Date NO. 86-10 Applicant: Ken Moody Renuest: Zone Change from (Q) C4 and C4 to R2 Location: 16852 and 16862 15olsa Chica Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk na 10-day public review period ending April 12 _x no comments, the attached comments were received. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration finding that the*proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. Retfully Tbmitted, - Diana Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner J& CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND • 1. Appl i cant xPn Mogdy 2. Address- _ 3. Telephone 41. Project Location 16852&_16862 4glu.4_C Qom_ '�. Project Title/hescript ion Negatiye t�. DdtV If. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding envi onment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No 3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, police, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No V 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No 5. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on • the existing: land use, population/hou ing, energy/utilities, natural resources, human health? Yes Maybe No 6. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet), III. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No V 2. Will project achieve short-term/ goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No 1__ 3. Does the project have impacts which ar individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No 7 4. Will the project advers ly affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No V. DETERMINATION ( �) Negative Declaration ( ) Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report • SIGNATURE • ;7 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM (Q)C4, QUALIFIED - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND C4, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO (Q)R21 QUALIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOLSA CHICA STREET BETWEEN WARNER AVENUE AND PEARCE STREET (ZONE CASE NO. 86-7) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 86-7 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of th Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the general plan, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: • SECTION 1. The following described real property, located on the east side of Bolsa Chica Street between Warner Avenue and Pearce Street is hereby changed from (Q)C4, "Qualified -Highway Commercial" and C4, "Highway Commercial" to (Q)R2, "Qualified -Medium Density Residential District": Parcel 1: The southerly 132 feet of Lot 1 in Block 5 of Tract 86, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 10, pages 35 and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said county. Parcel 2: The northerly 132.33 feet of the southerly 264.33 feet of Lot 1 in Block 5 of Tract 86, in the City of Huntington each, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 10, pages 35 and 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said county. subject to the following conditions: • 1. The two subject properties shall be developed as an integrated development, either in the form of a large project or subdivided into smaller lots with a cul-de-sac. SECTION 2. The Development Services Director of the City of Huntington Beach is hereby directed to change District Map 24 (Sectional District Map 21-5-11) to incorporate the zone change described in Section 1 hereof, and as said district map shall have been amended, the same shall be in full force and effect and be a part of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. A copy of said district map, as amended hereby, is available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. Section 9061, District Map 24 thereof, is hereby amended by Zone Case No. 86-7. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen days after adoption in th Huntington Beach Independent, a newspaper of general circulation. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1986. ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Administrator (4640d) Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Development Services 10 • • Publish NOTICE OF OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and .consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, May 5, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-7 LOCATION: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa Chica Street (east side approximately 800 feet north of Warner Avenue. PROPOSAL: A request for a change of zone from (Q) C4 (Qual'ified Highway Commercial) and C4 (Highway Commercial) to R2 (Medium Density Residential), ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-10 assessing the environmental effects of said zone change will also be considered by the City Council. ON FILE: A Copy of the proposed zone change and Negative Declaration are on file in the City Clerk's Office. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 *• NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-7 (A chance of zone from (Q)C4 and C4 to R2) NOTICE IS HERBBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DA'T�/TI!^E-rrir�iQ - 7 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-7 APPLICANT: J. T. Mocdy/Ken Moody LGCATIGN: 16852 and 16862 Bolsa Chica (east side approximately 800 feet north of Warner avenue) ZONE: (Q)C4 (Qualified Highway Commercial) and C4 (Highway Commercial) RSQUSS'n: A chance of zone from (Q)C4 and C4 to R2 (Medium Density Residential) T,N11IRCNM-7NTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-10 ON FILM: A copy of the proposed application is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PARSONS are invited to attend said 'nearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Scott Hess, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission w 933-81-008 Chapman Ronald P 8192 Prestwick Cir Huntington Beach Ca. 92646 933-81-009 Felty Grace 4918 Pearce Ave Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-010 Pruden Clarence A Jr 4936 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-011 Garcia Eduardo Y 5462 Bankton Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-017 933-81-026 Goeke Robert Frances Fed Natl Mtg. Assn 88 Seton Rd 4962 Marlin Dr Irvine, Ca. 92715 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 933-81-018 933-81-027 Ellis Kathleen D Lander Katie Anders 4968 Pearce Ave Westberg Inves Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 8071 Slater Ave #160 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 933-81-019 933-81-028 Cummings Marie Patrice Cannon Elane K 4972 Pearce St 4968 Marlin Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-020 Viscetto Emilie 4976 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-012 933-81-021 Plechner Carol A Miller Howard H 4942 Pearce St 4978 Pearce Ave Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-013 933-81-022 Valvov Kate H Stanton Richard E Kalpakoff, Karen E 4982 Pearce St 4946 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-014 Say Margaret J 18542 Pueblo Cir Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 933--81-015 Ashby Tom 4952 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-023 Warren George L & Dana L 4986 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-024 Thurman Debra K Thurman, Ralph S 361 Canada Sombre La Habra, Ca. 90631 933-81-029 Rivera Huntington Armsttong W C 16827 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-030 Tongbai Paibul 1905 N College Ave Ste D Santa Ana, Ca. 92706 933-81-031 Phillips Kathleen E 4978 Marlin Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-032 Norton Judy E 4982 Marlin Dr Huntington Beach, California 92649 933-81-033 Tullio James A 5331 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 833-81-016 933-81-025 933-81-034 Huang Gloria W Dalsimer Christopher T Williams Henry L 4440 Ironwood Ave 4992 Pearce St 4988 Marlin Dr #34 Seal Beach, Ca. 90740 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-035 933-81-037 933-81-047 Hersh Dale R Selstad Kathy S Williams William E 4987 Bonita Dr 4977 Bonita Dr 16821 Snapper Lane Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-036 933-81-038 933-81-048 Townsend Robert F Hamm Richard A Shedlock Robert 4981 Bonito Dr 21372 Brookhurst St Ste 524 P. 0. Box 685 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 Sunset Beach, Ca. 90742 933-81-029 933-81-039 933-81-049 Mivera Huntington Jaffe Andrienne Furniss Stephen Graham Armstrong W C 4971 Bonito Dr Parker, Anthony C 16827 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 5762 Silva St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Lakewood, Ca. 90713 933-81-030 933-81-040 933-81-050 Tongbai Baibul Hamu Kaino J25142 Wandering Ln Nissen Maureen H 1905 N. College Ave Ste D El ToroCa. 92630 , 4964 Bonita Dr Santa Ana, Ca. 92706 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-031 Phillips Kathleen F 4978 Marlin Dr Huntington Beach, Ca.92649 933-81-032 Norton Judy E 4982 Marlin Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-033 Tullio James A 5331 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-034 Williams Henry L 4988 Marlin Dr #34 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-035 Hersh Dale R 4987 Bonita Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-041 Eriksson Lars 3521 Heather Cir Seal Beach, Ca. 90740 933-81-042 Shaver Pamela 4961 Bonita Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-043 Carley Marie A Tr 16801 Shapper Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 933-81-051 Guerin Patricia C 4966 Bonito Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-052 Schreiber Max S Tr 4949 Warner Ave Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-053 Little Patrick J 4972 Bonito Dr 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-044 Cessop Charles T 2660 Walnut Ave Suite B Tustin, Ca. 92680 933-81-045 Lopez Adolfo 16811 Snapper Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 933-81-054 Lang Robert P 4976 Bonito Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-055 Ventling Cynthia 4978 Bonito Dr 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-036 933-81-046 933-81-056 Townsend Robert F Ingram Joan M Hamel Richard R 4981 Bonito Dr 16815 Snapper Ln 4982 Bonito Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 rl 146-241-03 & 04 Moody Janet T 4641 Los Patos Huntington Beach, Ca. 146-241-12 Winchica Community Water Bolsa Chica Water Co P. 0. Box 103 Sunset Beach, Ca. 90742 146-241-13 Nerio Masao 9340 Bolsa Ave Westminster, Ca. 92683 146-241-14 Law Jan 16811 Roosevelt Rd Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-15 Oviatt Joel P 4812 Hermanson Cir Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-16 Quine Richard V & Diana 2200 Park Newport #401 Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 146-241-17 Horton Irene M 20661 Suburbia Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 146-241-18 Hsu Hong -Yen 12020 B Centralia Ave Hawaiian Gardens, Ca. 90716 146-241-20 Hsu Hong Yen 12020 A Centralia Ave Hawaiian Gardens, Ca. 90716 146-241-21 Browning Mark J 16771 Roosevelt St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-36 Hsu Hong -Yen 12020 B Centralia Ave Hawaiian Gardens, Ca. 90716 146-241-45 Moody Janet T 4641 Los Patos Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-50 Swaroop Stinder 5 Rue Chateau Royal Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 146-241-53 Bank Orange City 2730 E. Chapman Ave Orange, Ca. 92669 178-263-11 Carl Spano 16911 Bolsa Chica Rd Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 178-263-12 March John F Tr 6541 Crista Palma Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 933-81-001 Erickson Robert F 4892 Pearce Ave Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-002 Herbold Albert B Tr 16128 Tortola Cir Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-003 Nielsen Terry 4898 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-904 Reed Diane M 4902 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-55 933-81-005 H A T PROPERTIES Manna Allen 3662 Katella Ave 4906 Pearce Ave Los Alamitos, Ca. 90720 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-56 A C 0 Development Co 540 N Golden Cir Dr #300 Santa Ana, Ca. 92705 933-81-006 Epstein Lester Alan 4908 Pearce St Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 146-241-19 178-233-04 933-81-007 Kumagai Henry Ichiro Hiroshima Howard M Tr Curley Robert F 19021 E Canyon Dr 16851 Bolsa Chica Rd 4912 Pearce St Orange, Ca. 92667 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-057 Ferris Kenneth 4988 Bonita Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 933-81-058 O'Farrell Ruth A 3647 Overland Ave Los Angeles, Ca. 90034 933-81-059 Hubbard George W 9678 Chenille Ave Fountain Valley, Ca. 92708 933-81-060 Molley Roy L 203 2nd St Seal Beach, Ca. 90740 933-81-061 Phillips Keith D 4967 Shart Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-062 Giancamilli Nicholas C 4961 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-063 Movsovich Libby -Ann et al 4957 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-064 Barry Joanne M 4955 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-065 Helsop Ray D 4951 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-066 Hargis Richard N 4947 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-070 Perkins Evelyn J 16839 Bream Lane Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-071 Kropfli Peter K 16841 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-072 Paul Frank A 16843 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-073 Cox Randall 1 16845 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-074 Han Kwang Young 16847 Bream Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-075 Harlan Betty L 4915 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-076 West John T 5512 E. Britton Dr Long Beach, Ca. 90815 933-81-077 Stone Rick 4907 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-079 Byrnes Robert C 4901 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-080 Balazs Albin D 4897 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-081 Jasper Herman B 4895 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-082 Stojakovic Dianne M 4891 Shark Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-083 Sobczyk Robert E 16832 Barracuda Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-084 Mukanos Tim 16828 Barracuda Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-085 Smith Roberta C 16826 Barracuda Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-086 Sogoian Samuel 3892 Sirius Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-087 De Jarnette Ronile 16822 Barracuda Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-079 933-81-078 933-81-088 Byrnes Robert C Johnson Dana A Goddard S Warren 4901 Shark Dr 4905 Shark Ln 16811 Barra uda Ln Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 Huntington �eacti, Ca. 92649 933-81-089 Brough Alan J 426 S La Esperanza San Clemente, Ca. 92672 933-81-090 Armstrong George A #1 Anderson St Surfside, Ca. 90743 933-81-091 Rivera Huntington West, John T 5512 Britton Dr Long Beach, Ca. 90816 933-81-092 White Marvin L 4896 Skipjack Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-093 Fithian Robert M 6582 Rennrick Cir Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 933-81-094 Kelly Jane L P. 0. Box 1087 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 933-81-095 Gilpin Don E 5703 Lakia Dr Cypress, Ca. 90630 933-81-096 Wojtaszek Walter J 4908 Skipjack Dr Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-81-097 Broker Bruce & Catherine 12 Hunter Ave Irvine, Ca. 92720 933-81-098 Salem Frank A 961 Sandlewood La Habra, Ca. 92631 Mr. Ken Moody 4641 Los Patos Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 (applicant) Mr. Ken Mocd,y 4641 Los Pat.os Huntington Beach, a 92 49 (applicant) Mr. Robert F. Curtis 4952 Warner Ave. 8300 Iluntington Beach, Ca 92649 (owner) Mr. Robert F. Curtis 4952 Warner Ave. Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 (owner) r ,,y�y• iff City of Huntington Beach 't� P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92818 From The Desk Of Douglas N. La Belle Deputy City Administrator May 10, 1988 Connie, In view of the recent action concerning Condition of Approval for Angus Petroleum this matter should be pulled and will be handled as a part of the new application process. Thanks, Doug xc: Mike Adams, Planning Director REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIPACTION February 16, 1988 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administratop?j Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Director, Community Development Subject: ANGUS PETROLEUM PROJECT - NOISE ATTENUATION Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REGARDING�J AJ 2//6/ ] New Policy or Exception W*A! Nwc*44 t .A Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: G STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Attached for City Council review and action is staff's recommendations for implementing Condition No. 15 of Use Permit No. 86-7 (Angus Petroleum) as considered by the City Council as a part of their review on November 2, 1987. The staff recommends that the City Council approve the action plan contained herein for implementing the "noise" conditions contained in Use Permit No. 86-7. ANALYSIS• Condition No. 15 of Use Permit No. 86-7 states that: "The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. At the applicants expense a continuous calibrated meter shall be on site to monitor the decibel (dBA) level with a printed copy to be made available to City Staff and Ad Hoc Project Review Committee on a weekly basis." Staff has prepared an action plan to provide for the implementation of Condition No. 15. The action plan is stated as follows: a. A report prepared by an acoustical engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval prior to commencing drilling. Said report shall predict and project dBA sound levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and adjacent residential property line both with and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and service rigs. The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to assure compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Code and a maximum noise level at the residential property line of 50 dBA during the nighttime hours between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. PI O 5/85 • • b. Prior to commencement of the drilling phase ambient noise readings shall be taken at site adjacent to the project by a noise consultant to be retained by the City. Cost of said consultant shall be the responsibility of the developer. Number and locations of said readings shall be determined by the Director of Community Development. C. Upon commencement of the drilling phase of the project, the City's consultant shall monitor the site for a two -week period with a continuous calibrated meter and shall provide staff and the Angus Project Review Committee with a printout of the recorded decibel levels. d. Further monitoring of the project shall be done selectively at the request of the Angus Project Review Committee, area residents or staff. All requests for monitoring shall first be approved by the Director of Community Development and shall be made as soon thereafter as the request is received. FUNDING SOURCE: A noise consultant shall be chosen by the City of Huntington Beach and retained at the applicant's expense for the purpose of monitoring the sound levels on the site. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny the staffs recommendation and require continuous 24 hour noise monitoring of the site. 1. Noise Conditions. 2. Council Minutes of Annual Review of November 2, 1987. DLB:MA:MS:jr (9995d) Page 9 - Minutes of Council/Agency - 11/2/87 co function with the owners of the park that would set forth the utual obligations of both parties. This agreement will be ached ed for Council consideration and action following its complet' n. (City Council - REVISIONS OF REFUSE COLLECTION RATES - AP - D1SPQSALZ`OMPAAY — SUPPL _ EMENT # 9 The Deputy City Cl k presented a communication from the Assistant to the Cit Administrator regarding the agreement between the City and R 'nbow Disposal. The Interim City Administr4or presented a staff report. A motion was made by bannister seconded by Erskine, to approve and authorize execution of Suppl entaI Agreement No. 9 between the City and Rainbow Disposal Comp y, amending the current agreement to increase the resident trash collection rate from $6.31 per month to $6.58 per mont for each residential unit of service through September 30, 1 8 and to increase commercial bin rates by an average of 2.1 as shown on Exhibit"A" to agreement. The motion carrie by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, teen, Bannister NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Bannister left the roust. (City Council) - ANGUS PETROLEUM CORPORATION - ANNUAL REVIEW PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO USE PERMIT NO 86-7 - APPLICATIONS TO AD HOC COMMITTEE TO BE ACCEPTED The Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the Community Development Director transmitting for Council's consideration the required annual review of Use Permit 86-7 - Angus Petroleum Corporation pursuant to Condition #53 of the conditions of approval and modification of five or the original conditions imposed on Angus Petroleum Corporation. Subject location is the two blocks bounded by Delaware, Huntington, Toronto & Rochester. The Deputy City Administrator/Community Development presented a staff report. Discussion was held regarding the feasibility of installing a fixed noise monitor with a printed read out to operate continuously with the reports to be made available to officials and the Ascon Ad Hoc Committee. Discussion was held regarding Condition No. 41 pertaining to the Emergency Action Plan. The masonry walls surrounding the site and the make up of the Ascon Committee was discussed. 0 ndge 10 - Minutes of Council/Agency - 11/2/87 A motion was made by Green, seconded by Mays, to modify conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 86-7 as follows: Condition #1: The site plans dated October 20, 1987 shall be the approved project layout. Condition #7: Changes have been required and incorporated in the project during the course of the public hearing and consultation process to mitigate or avoid the significant adverse environmental effects of the project; the Division of Oil and Gas entorces rules and regulations for the conduct of secondary recovery operations; the mitigation measures incorporated, proposed ana adopted, together with application of the rules and regulations of the Division of Oil and Gas, will effectively mitigate all of the adverse impacts identified; public agencies other than the City, including the Division of Oil and Gas, Regional Water Quality Control Board and South Coast Air Quality Management District, will be reviewing aspects of this project for mitigation measures as to matters within their responsibility and jurisdiction, including subsurface operation, water and air quality; the critical need for oil renders infeasible the alternatives of no project or delayed project implementation, and alternative surface locations are infeasible because of their limited availability, or the greater disruption to the community at large which would result therefrom. Except the well cellar excavation and construction be allowed to proceed concurrently with the construction of masonry walls, landscaping and street improvements. Condition #15Y The project shall Cully comply with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. At the applicants expense a continuous calibrated meter shall be on site to monitor the decibel (dba) level with a printed copy to be made available to city staff and Ad Hoc A.,con Project Review Committee on a weekly basis'. Condition #41: Prepare and submit a Preliminary Emergency Action Plan (EAP) prior to issuance of building permits. A completed Emergency Action Plan based on as -built plans shall be completed and submitted prior to the start of oil production operations. The Emergency Action Plan shall include employee training and periodic practice, how spillage onto street from site('s) would be handled (stockpile of sand, etc.), the safe handling of any chemicals and/or materials, and full knowledge of all .. , A. Fage 11 - Minutes of Council/Agency - 11/2/87 systems and emergency equipment. A copy shall be on file with the Fire Department and updated on a five year basis. In addition, a Spill Prevention and Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan in compliance with City requirements for handling of spills, etc., not otherwise covered in the Emergency Action Plan shall be completed and filed with the City prior to the start of oil production operations. Condition #53: The City Council shall review and, if necessary, may modify the conditions as set forth in this use permit, at the first regular City Council meeting following September 21, 1988, and at five year intervals thereafter, and upon any change in ownership of the project which occurs between five-year reviews; provided that the phrase "change of ownership" as used herein shall not include any sale or other transfer to a corporation, partnership or other form of business organization in which Alberta Natural Gas -United States and/or one or more of its shareholders or suosidiaries owns the controlling interests, or any sale or transfer so long as Angus or one of its subsidiaries retains responsibility for the operation or the project. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winchell, Mays, Kelly, Erskine, Green NOES: Finley ABSENT: Bannister (out of the room) Interim City Administrator Cook informed Council that applications for a position on the Ad Hoc Ascon Project Review Committee were still being accepted. A motion was made by Winchell, seconded by Kelly, to amend Condition #55 to read as follows: Condition #55: A nine member project review committee shall be selected by City Council to assure compliance with conditions of this use permit. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister (out of the room) Councilman Bannister returned to the room. 0 • NOISE CONDITIONS — ANGUS PETROLEUM PROJECT USE PERMIT 86-7 13. A report prepared by an acoustical engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services for review and approval prior to com— mencing drilling. Said report shall predict and project dBA sound levels at the Angus Oil Site property line and adjacent residential property line both with and without an acoustical blanket on the drilling rig and service rigs. The report shall indicate noise attenuation measures necessary to assure compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Code and a maximum noise level at the residential property line of 50 dBA during the nighttime hours between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. (a) A double acoustical blanket enclosure shall be provided at man —door entrances. 14. Noise attenuation for the drilling operation, oil operation and service operation shall be provided pursuant to the Oil Code and noise report specified in Condition 13. (a) If a noise problem occurs, the entire drilling structure shall be wrapped with an acoustical blanket for greater noise attenuation. 15. (a) The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. 15. (b) The project shall fully comply with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. At the applicants expense a continuous calibrated meter shall be on site to monitor the decibel (dba) level with a printed copy to be made available to city staff and Ad Hoc Ascon Project Review Committee on a weekly basis. 16. No speakers, loud bells or buzzers shall be employed on site. 3539h Authc FIZW!,- 'C: PUbliSh AdvarlibornanN of a8 kind& ►neludinp Public noticai e: f'IOf•►o0 of the SuporiC>f Court of 9" no County. Cm.;�t Iforl4lb. 'urr',bar A-6214. dated 29 Seplort to 1. and A-24631, dol *d 11 June. 19V STATE-6F ,.kLIFORNIA County of Orange puck 0= ♦e.�s„& cowed or Ww arneo.h b w w 1 tW amn ,0 vaos cox~ .eon, I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and Complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 time consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of April 10 , 198 6 , 198 , 198 , 198 198 - I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. April 10- 6 Executed on , 198 — at,Co to Mesa, California. Signature &L S PUBLIC NOTI� NOTICE Oh PUBLIC HEARI G ZONE CHANG N0.88-5 AND NEGATIVE NO.86-7 NOTICE IS HE EBY GIVEN that the Hunti Beach City Council will hold a public hearing In the Coun- cil Chamber at the .Hunt' ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Hunt- ington Beach, California, on the date' and at, the time in- dicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the appli- cation described below. DATE:.Monday, April 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 86-5 & Negative Declar- ation No. 86-7 LOCATION: 8111 New- man Avenue (generally located east of ,Cameron Street on the north side of Newman Avenue) PROPOSAL: To change the zoning from R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Rest- Idential District). ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS! Negative Declar anon No. 86-7 will also be ,considered In conjunction with Zone Change No. 86-5.' jl''ON FILE: A copy of the proposed zone change and negative declaration are on file in the Department of De- velopment Services. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend, said hearing and express) opinions or submit evidence! for or against the' application as outlined above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this"proposal] are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, '2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for. inspection by the public._ ' HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, By: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk, Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 4/7/86 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot April 10, 1986 Th-820 v 1 REQUES♦ FOR CITY COUNCIAACTION Date April 91 ., 1 g 8 A Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrato Prepared by. James W. Palin, Director, Development Services v Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-5 Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, AttachmUUents: z f-' STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zone Change No. 86-5 is a request to rezone 0.16 net acres (7113.6 square feet) of property located on the north side of Newman, approximately 219 feet east of Cameron Avenue, from R5 (Office Professional) to R3-25 (Medium High Density Residential). RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation on April 1, 1986: ON MOTION BY MIRJAHANGIR AND SECOND BY ROWE, ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-5 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-7 WAS APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Erskine, Livengood, Mirjahangir, Porter NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The staff recommendation is identical to that of the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The applicant originally requested a zone change from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). Staff recommended a zone change to R3-25 (Medium High Density Residential: 25 units maximum density per acre). The "-25" designation allows development with a maximum of four units on this site; a straight R3 designation as originally requested by the applicant, would have allowed 5 units to be constructed. P10 4/84 The 7113.6 sq. ft. site is of inadequate size to accommodate development of more than four units and meet the code requirements for setbacks, open space, parking and lot coverage. Small lots such as this, do not allow for the "economies -of -scale" advantage enjoyed by projects developed on large lots. This advantage makes higher densities possible while still providing a liveable project that meets code. Providing a 25 ft. wide drive isle to service this 60 ft. wide parcel for example, affects its ability to provide other requirements such as open space, parking and setbacks to a greater extent than it would for development on a larger lot. Staff's intent for limiting the ultimate density to 4 units is to avert requests for variances to site development standards, in the future. Four units are recommended as the maximum density, only if code requirements can be met through appropriate site design. The applicant concurred with staff's recommendation to limit the density to a maximum of four units on the subject site. The adjacent 2.4 acre parcel to the east was restricted to R3-22 when a zone change was originally requested from R2 to R3 (ZC No. 81-7). The concerns at that time were the potential impacts resulting from the increased density. To minimize potential impacts, density was limited to 22 units maximum per acre on this parcel. The proposed zone change to medium high density residential will result in zoning that is not consistent with the City's General Plan designation of Office professional, for the subject site. The City's General Plan policy 4.1, however, permits the zoning to be inconsistant with the General Plan if the site is less than one (1) acre as established by the size criteria in the Land Use Element. This site is approximately .16 acres, therefore, no General Plan Amendment is required for development of this site to Medium High Density Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services has posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-4 for ten days. No comments, either verbal or written have been received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued. Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-5, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-7. The Planning Commission has approved Negative Declaration No. 86-5. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. RCA - 4/21/86 -2- (4635d) ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Denying Zone Change No. 86-5 would result in a parcel of inadequate size to economically develop to R5 standards. A minimum lot area 9,000 sq. ft. is required for the R5 zone. With this scenario, the property would probably not be built for an office professional use and thus remain as it exists now, a single family residential unit. Approving this zone change as R3 instead of R3-25 would permit a maximum of 5 units rather than 4 units respectively, to be developed on this site. This would result in a development that could not meet all the code requirements for setbacks, open space, parking, lot coverage or drive isle widths. It would also result in increased impacts on surrounding property due to the increased density. JWP:EN: jr ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Area Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Planning Commission 5. Negative Declaration JWP:EN: kla Staff Report dated April 1, 1986 No. 86-7 RCA - 4/21/86 -3- (4635d) m ZONING M. DM 30 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 25-5-II ,D•LF ....---- - .wr.E°° NOTE o Me Mlaxa ue IM fFET CITY OF ADOPTED AUORDI L 17T COUNCIL 15, 1960 ORDINANCE N0._ 78S ZUNE w• toxF •on�w �wc •w. nicxT or .•r �s iwrEvo[o .o [.rt+o *n T.F ccwr[n RIGHT or �•. AMENDED FORD. NO. AMENDED ce ORD- N0. OF sDcx LEGEND 3-27-61 ifA 829 12-9-68 66.521273 cF�F LOMM .—FACIUTIEIIE—.T*.D.S—T 2_o_61 211 BTT 1-3-67 PP66 O orrlcE Peoreslloxa O1aTRrcT 12-IB-61 218 880 5-7-62 237 900 4- 17_676736741309 9-18-67 67-221349 PO ANNED DEVELOPMENT DIST—T FL HUNTINGTON BEACH 6-IB-62 251 908 3-IB-68 67-31 1398 O SKC F• 7 R[lETMCE plTRKT YiL 4- I-6i 290 957 417 fi- 17-68 68-2 19I7 ® vE[uL 20NC CEMETERY uu��., rroow� _EC r>� � 41 459 14 17.69 6T © co.u•nsMTRc ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA O. a-ae w1 6 - 3 - 63 291 969 6-24- 3 - 32 1486 :8 r. •-5 251F -16sa 12-2-63 3771021 - i6-64 !80 102816M 2-I67P -P70-8 12-20-71 PPTI♦ 16910 Mu LSi] �CO[RCALsTR,CT ® UMITED IkLTroU n I_T RESID[MC[ MTR� 1 -20-64 389 1031 2-7 -72 T-39 1731 ] R[lmErrtlFL •GMp1LrlW4 D'nT i- 16-64 408 1043 3-20-72 7". 1615 OWLrtiFD CLAS11,CATION I% LEGEND - 5-4-64 3691052 4-3-72 T2-3 1739 8-19.64 463 1079 4-17-72 72-41741 1 - 4 - 65 485 1111 5- 1 -72 72-10 1744 -- 5[TeACR LRE 5-7-73 72-481832 2-7-77 76�26I 60 ----- ICTr•T[ m41rt D• .•Y 16i-ii-IT .T7-9 22)I lam% ARECGE At- OF aTRE[T •L4MMENT WARNER UL.J�i11�L,J 7-a a Tea Zia! AVE z. �r 1 RI RI CITY OF iOUNT•IV vLLEY j{ I -- i � AMSTERpAM DR tc J m R2 ■ _ _ RI J R2 R2 2 W W IOR CA 'o o oW RI L _RI UR- RI RI RI REMBRANOT z z J RI J RI W RI a MARSEI LE OR RI POLDER CR 1 I C4 300 RI RI .a E, R I I R I I !O FRIE AND DR 1 RI : �R3 a �J RI 4 GUILDERS DR 2 • Z HOLLAND R I ��r ° ¢ c_aK= �<._ws:hC:,r.1 RI RI RI � x kAa7 RI ;uPD nRI R I �Rl J � _ Rg 6k 0 0 J1 I jw--[Ji — +SLATER 3N26 z; F-i DR2 R2R2 R2TR•CT .eel L 95 a R3 6 w RI i9 1 2a9 66 J N N Y eE"'A N RI a i R2 I •� R2 NOBLE CR J R 1 6 FL •RRON R5 a�E4 R2 R5 i Sp-1 N. LINE a I12 .IR !. 1/. i 8 R2-PD-02) S P_ I _! 'Y(Q)RA RI TALBERT AVE NNINU l� SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 26 - 5-11 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A& ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP WARNER J+ r 0 ... tyw � d AVE TALBERT AVE G J m 01 - i ro .. . .. 00 ...• �• /dsP/TAL .. 60• QEC ROEO CLiVd- P R. P. S4 giros e4 Ht �!'CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MlNTtW,MN MACH To Evelyn Nichka From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date NO. Applicant: Roger Slates 1701 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Request: To request the zoning from R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential District) Location: 8111 Newman Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending April 5, 1986 and no comments, the attached comments were received. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission apd cit council approve Negative Declaration No. 86-7 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, va� G%U- Diana Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner JRB/dc � sraFf huntington beach development services department EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: April 1, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-5/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-7 APPLICANT/ Roger D. Slates OWNER: 1701 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: LOCATION: • ACREAGE: • DATE ACCEPTED: March 14, 1986 To change the zoning from MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential Dist.) 8111 Newman Net .16 acre (7113.6 sq. ft.) 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: May 13, 1986 ZONE: R5 (Office Professional District) GENERAL PLAN: Office Professional EXISTING USE: Single family residential Approve Zone Change NO. 86-5 with modification to R3-25 approve Negative Declaration No. 86-7 and recommend adoption to the City Council. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-5 is a request to rezone 0.16 net acres (7113.6 sq. ft.) of property located on the north side of Newman approximately 219 ft. east of Cameron Avenue, from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). This site was originally zoned R2 (Medium Density Residential). In 1967 a zone change to R5 (Office Professional) was requested. The zone change was denied by the Planning Commission because it was considered to be "spot" zoning and was appealed to the City Council. On March 18, 1968, the City Council approved Zone Change No. 67-31. Within the next year zone changes for R2 to R5 had been individually filed and approved for the properties between Cameron and the subject site. • • L A -f M-23A • 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Office Professional R5 (Office Professional) Single family residential High Density Residential R3 (Medium High Density Residential) Apartments High Density Residential R3-22 (Medium High Density Residential 22 unit maximum density per acre) Condominiums High Density Residential R5 (Office Professional) Hospital Office Professional R5 (Office Professional) Professional Offices Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services will have posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-4 for ten days. No comments, either verbal or written has been received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-5, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-7. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. Staff Report 4/l/86 -2- 4542d • • • • 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS; The applicant is requesting a zone change from R5 (Office Professional) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential). Staff is recommending a zone change to R3-25 (Medium High Density Residential: 25 units maximum density per acre). The "-25" designation will allow development with a maximum of four units on this site; while a straight R3 designation as requested by the applicant, would allow 5 units to be constructed. Staff feels the 7113.6 sq. ft. site is of inadequate size to accommodate development of more than four units and meet the code requirements for setbacks, open space, parking and lot coverage. Small lots such as this, do not allow for the "economies -of -scale" advantage enjoyed by projects developed on large lots. This advantage makes higher densities possible while still providing a liveable project that meets code. Providing a 25 ft. wide drive isle to service this 60 ft. wide parcel for example, affects its ability to provide other requirements such as open space, parking and setbacks to a greater extent than it would for development on a larger lot. •Staff's intent for limiting the ultimate density to 4 units is to avert requests for variances to site development standards, in the future. Four units are recommended as the maximum density, only if code requirements can be met through appropriate site design. The adjacent 2.4 acre parcel to the east was restricted to R3-22 when a zone change was originally requested from R2 to R3 (ZC No. 81-7). The concern at that time were the potential impacts resulting from the increased density. Therefore, to minimize potential impacts, density was limited to 22 units maximum per acre on this property. The proposed zone change to medium high density residential will result in zoning that is inconsistant with the City's General Plan designation of Office professional, for the subject site. State Law, however, permits the zoning to be inconsistant with the General Plan if the site is less than one (1) acre. This site is approximately .16 acres, therefore, no General Plan Amendment is required for development of this site to Medium High Density Residential. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-5 with a modification of the zoning to R3-25 (Medium High Density Residential: 25 units per acre maximum density). Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 86-7 and recommend its adoption to the City Council with the • following findings: SStaf RepBrt 4/1/§§ __42d FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. A general plan amendment is not required for this project as • State Law permits parcels less than one (1) acre to have zoning that is inconsistant with the general plan. 2. Medium high density residential development of the subject site, with a maximum density of 25 units/acre will be compatible with surrounding land uses. 3. Approval of Zone Change No. 86-5 will not be detrimental to the Health, Safety and Welefare of the surrounding community. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Denying Zone Change No. 86-5 would result in a parcel of inadequate size to economically develop to R5 standards. A minimum lot area 9,000 sq. ft. is required for the R5 zone. With this scenario, the property would probably not be build for an office professional use and thus remain as it exists now, a single family residential unit. Approving this zone change as R3 instead of R3-25 would permit a maximum of 5 units rather than 4 units respective to be developed on this site. This would result in a development that could not meet the code requirements for setbacks, open space, parking, lot coverage or drive isle widths. It would also result in increased impacts on surrounding property due to the increased density. JWP�N: jr is ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Draft Ordinance 4. Negative Declaration No. 86-7 Staff Report 4/1/86 -4- 4542d dos ... . .. A. P/ rAL �/E�vMn►io� A vE QECo4eyelo R. A Sc lo7al..44IN ST,Q�'iT AIVAZ/Ae7At/ • • PLANNING ZONING DM 30 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 25-5-II :e.. — — •..—.�° NOTE .6� .Wu6T ," .�«r•.,r•.•N,...., CITY OF em eouwelL 010lwAwn 6 •� iew .a,e1.1•r ... •10■, > ... r �•n.■te a nnw ,n nr u.n• r ww •wof ... AY N OND. NjD AKMDU _ Olp, Ip. IEGENDt 3-27.41 10 M 12•10-M son*?? ®aerwrin ntrnaaleouu,rrdenlc7 12. / - 61 211 977 6. 7 -62 137 goo 251 1 - 3-67 P me rno 9 - 16-Q 6PQ21319 0 � �� a, ® r .ao OrAw• w er,.t, HUNTINGTON BEACH 6-0- 62 wesea -62 261 906 3.17-o'w-n10o0 7-10-a O-! as t.� a .Qi rri r.ry �aa0rx or,•er 4-1 • 63 290 967 6. 17-a . 1117 © 0� 1a■!a•,t ORiMm.1n 3.2o•Q We me 12-16-a 60-1114" ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r3r n+sa a 1 ao 6-21•q Sao 970 `' °' "' "' ._7-""-321.a •-is-a at r01616 ® �'•�, '■.mQ o■t•1a of-re ■-. :ar +nu s. 21n 3-.-e •s•• :n� a-2-sa Snlo21 1 - 6 -01 30o io2s 2-16-nPv1o61632 12.2o-71 Pvri-11690 �i] —•� 1s.owf.. irr•er ® �.•= 1A17/Ii war ifao01c2 amen 1 • 20-M 300 1031 2.7 -12 h!9 1731 © •[rKMYI r-4171rr1 arT111f.', i 1s-7?2 ins � � S-� •6~I �f IOSa 772 3 � - 6•i9.64 N31079' /-0-72 r2-11741 1-1-a 445-111 3-1-72 72-D - 6-7-73 71/01032 — u7raa ■rrt a sls 2 -7_�� (.�.r I 7/1. +1ar •l.f• 07 fr1 ct' &L"wc- WARNER u r• J I UL_I�L�JIt—J ' 17-1e f Av E 1� i• f c1Jf T7 Of IOUNT.iV v.11E'/ 0 I1L .. re 11r f• i1 TALBERT AVE yD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DRAFT • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED EAST OF CAMERON ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NEWMAN (ZONE CHANGE 86-5). WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 86-5 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the general plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: Section 1. The following described rear property, generally located east of Cameron on the north side of Newman Avenue is hereby changed from R5 "Office Professional" to C3 "Medium High Density Residential": • The subject property is legally described as: That portion of Tract 405, Lot 20, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 16, Page 31, Miscellaneous maps in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the (NW 1/4) northwest quarter of the (SW1/4) southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 5 south, Range 11 west, of the San Bernardino base and meridian, thence north 89027115" east 599.36 feet; thence north 0045100" east along east boundary line 118.56 feet to a point, said point being the northeast corner of Lot 20 of said Tract 405; thence south 89027'45" west 60.00 feet along north property line of said Lot 20 to a point; thence south 0045100" west 118.56 feet to the true point of beginning Section 2. Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District 30 (Sectional District Map 25-5-11) is hereby amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto. The Director of Development Services is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said district map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. • PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1986. (4508d) • 0� CITY 'OF HUNTINGTON BEACH t�1 INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION "TtNCTM MACH To Evelyn Nichka From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date NO. Applicant: Roger Slates 1701.Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Request: To request the zoning from R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential District) Location: 8111 Newman Background Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was published in the local newspaper and posted in the Office of the City Clerk for a 10-day public review period ending April 5, 1986 and no comments, the attached comments were received. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the Planning Commission alad City Council approve Negative Declaration No. 86-7 finding that the'proposed project wi 1 not have a significant adverse fec o the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, o ?F /-a D. c� S44_.�_ Diana Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner JRB/dc • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • INITIAL STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS I. BACKGROUND Appl icant _gc)Qer D, Slates ?. Address 8111 Newman X. Telephone _ I'ro,jert Location g�1J Newman__ Pvojec't. Title/Description Zone Change from R5 to R-S I)a tr. ------ If. INVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No Z_ Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No x 3. Impacts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- su t in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, police, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No _X 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No X '.,. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on • the existing: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities, natural resources, hianan health? Yes Maybe No x t>. other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). Ill. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( X ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No x 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No x 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No x 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No V. DETERMINATION ( X) Negative Declaration ( } Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report • DATE - SIGNATURE Y Publish April 10, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-5 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, April 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-5 & Negative Declaration No. 86-7 LOCATION: 8111 Newman Avenue (generally located east of Cameron Street on the north side of Newman Avenue) PROPOSAL: To change the zoning from R5 (Office Professional District) to R3 (Medium High Density Residential District) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-7 will also be considered in conjunction with Zone Change No. 86-5. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed zone change and negative declaration are on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated: 4/7/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-5 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: April 1, 1986 - 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-5/Negative Declaration 86-7 APPLICANT: Roger D. Slates LOCATION: 8111 Newman Avenue (generally located east of Cameron on the north side of Newman Avenue) ZONE: R5 (Office Professional District) REQUEST: To change the zoning- from R5 (Office Professional District) to P.3 (Medium High Density Residential District) ENVIRONMFNTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration 86-7 ON FILE: A copy of the proposed zone change and negative declaration are on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Evelyn Nichka, Assistant Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission (4405d-5) ;Iai .*Dulgarian. 82.6' E. 62nd Street Los Angeles, CA 90001 167-471-10 Cameron Apartment Ltd. 1215 Sand Key Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 167-471-11 Hai Ching Enterprises 1786 Oriole Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 167-471-12 & 13 Donald Lyons 8161 Newman Avenye, #A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 167- 83-31 Robert Stellrecht 16591 Graham Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 167-483-34 Inc. Huntington Intercommuuiity Hosp. P.O. Box 1438 Louisville, KY 40201 I67-681-16 & 03 Teunis Deering 9568 Hamilton, Suite 343 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 167-471-14 Specialists Enterprises 17822 Beach Blvd, Suite 201 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 167-471-18 & 19 Humana Inc P.O. Box 1438 Louisville, KY 40201 167-601-14 AiffAcon�/oc,�,ne-, Arnold Angelici 21902 Starfire Lane 20r, S/Q fee Huntington Beach, CA 92646 -*141^ S-i. 167-471-20 /fv,. fi,,j- /,' 9 .xG y8' John Durloo 8888 Lauderdale Ct #B215 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 167-483-25 Chris Tsai 1900 Via Coronel Palos Verdes Estates 167-482-26 James Thomas 6556 Walt Street Westminster, CA 92683 167-483-27 & 29 Bradley Souder 11211 Stonecress Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 167-483-28 0/ - ins hQ.,� 06 ca 'xi, Ronald Nakagawa 20161 Viva Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 167-483-30 Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinAcluding public notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California. Number A-6214. dated 29 September. 1961. and A-24831. dated t t June. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange o,.pxc Not" Aowuwq cow60 by trw srna"i is sit in7 point ,... ,o pKa COk~ wdtn I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME XZK_4f'J7CQMU*Y*9MX9Cto wit the issue(s) of September 29 198 6 198 198 198 198 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. September 29 6 Executed on 198, at Co�ta Mesa, Cal ;fornia. Signature PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO 86/4 USE PERMIT NO.86-7 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- ington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Hunt- ington Beach, Calfornia, on the date and at the times indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the appli- cation described below. DATEIrIME: Monday, Oc- tober 13. 1986, 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal - Zone Change No. 86-4/Use Permit No. 86-7 /Environmental impact Report No. 86-1 APPLICANT: Angus Pet- roteum Corp. APPELLANT: Councilman John Thomas LOCATION: Two blocks bounded by Delaware Street to the east. Huntingtonre Stet to the west, Toronto Avenue to the north and Rochester Avenue to the south. PROPOSAL: Zone Change: A change of zone from "Oidtown Specific Plan (District 2}-0" to "Oldtown Specific Plan (District 201". Use Permit: to de- velop a consolidated drillsite and oil operation. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Final Environmen- tal Impact Report No. 88-1 will also be considered by Council. ON FILE A legal descrip- tion, a coy of the proposed PUBLIC NOTICE zone change, use permit and EIR are on file In the De- velopment Services Depart- : ment, 2D00 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Call- fornia 92648. for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal -are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street. Huntington Beach, C811f0mia, for Inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, Br: Allele K Wentworth, City Clerk, PNaw. (714) s86-5405 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot September 29. 1986 M311 PROOF OF PUBLICATION AuthortEed to Publ►sh:Advert►ti4?rt 11111, Of all kends wtcWing pubbt notices by Dw ree of the Superior Court of Cape County, Callforn►s, rdumbi r A-6214. 061e6 29 SePlem4 tta61, and A-24631, c,?9ted 11 Juno. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange ►mot" Aa.0-h" cc.wad t>T enx e r sea In T ®orx am to P" "60nn Siam I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid-, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC. HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete Copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 t i me -- consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of April 8 , 198 6 198 , 198 , 198 198 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on Anril 10 , 1gg 6 at C Mesa, Califo(/n�iaf r� ._ ignature PUBLICNOTICE NOTICE.OF PUBLIC HEARING, ZONE CHANGE, No. 86-3 NOTICE , IS. HEREBY GIVEN that the' Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Coun- cil .Chamber at the Hunt- ington' Beach_ Civic Center, 2000 ' Main Street, Hunt-' ington Beach, California, on the date and at the time in- dicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons, who wish to be heard relative "to the appli- cation described below. DATE: April 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 86-3 LOCATION: west side of Beach,. Boulevard approx- imately 200- feet south of Yorktown. PROPOSAL: A change of zone from C2 (community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative .Declar- ation No. 86-3 will also be considered in conjunction with Zone Change 86-3. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed Zone Change 86-3 is on file in the Department of Development Services.' ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and. -express opinions or submit evidence for or "against the application as outlined above. All appli- cations, exhibits, and de- scriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY COUNCIL, By: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk, Phone (714) 536-5405; . Dated 413/86 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot April 8, 1986 T-1351 LIU CITY OF HUNTINGTtN BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 22, 1986 Chandulal Patel 19091 E. Colima Road Rowland Heights, CA CALIFORNIA 92648 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, April 21, 1986 denied by tie -vote Zone Change 86-3. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California, you have ninety days from April 22, 1986 to apply to the courts for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office - 536-5227. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:bt Enclosure CC: Gail Hutton, City Attorney Jim Palin, Development Services Director I Telephone: 714-536-5227 ) REQUES , FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Subject: Date April 21, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council Charles W. Thompson, City Administra o James W. Palin, Director, Development Services,�r� `" ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-3 Consistent with Council Policy? [x.] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception &-eQ. Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: J STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Zone Change No. 86-3, a request to rezone 0.43 acres of property located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, south of Yorktown Avenue, from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation on March 18, 1986: ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY ERSKINE, PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-3 AND RECOMMENDED ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Schumacher, Erskine, Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT:* None ABSTAIN: None Staff recommendation is identical to that of the Planning Commission. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject property as General Commercial;. therefore the requested C4 zoning is consistent with the General Plan Designation. 2. Commercial development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are similarly developed. PIO 4/84 ANALYSIS: Zone Change No. 86-3 is a request to redesignate a 0.43 acre site located on the west side of Beach Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of Yorktown Avenue from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a 35 unit motel. The C4 district is "generally intended for land and structures to provide hotels and motels for transients and vacation visitors with convenient access along heavily traveled highway frontage." Highway Commercial Zoning (C4) is further intended to provide controlled commercial uses on a highway location where it is not detrimental to adjoining property development. The site is presently designated as General Commercial on the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan. A zone change from C2 to C4 (Highway Commercial) would continue to maintain consistency with the General Plan. On April 7, 1986, the City Council approved Code Amendment No. 86-8, a revision to the ordinance code pertaining to motel development. Specifically, minimum lot size and frontage will be increased from 9,000 square feet, 70 foot frontage, to 20,000 square feet, 100 foot frontage, for motel and hotel developments. The subject property is approximately 18,900 square feet and 70 feet wide. If Zone Change No. 86-3 is approved and adopted by the City Council, the site being considered will not meet the minimum standards for developing a motel. Even though the parcel will not qualify for a motel/hotel development, staff still considers this property as a good site for C4 (Highway Commercial) development. Staff has provided the Council (see attached) with the permitted uses in the C4 district. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-3 evaluates the environmental effects of Zone Change No. 86-3. Prior to any action on the request for change of zone the City Council must adopt Negative Declaration No. 86-3. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may consider denying Zone Change No. 86-3 and leaving the subject site zoned C2 (Community Business District). RCA - 4/21/86 -2- (4632d) C] ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Minutes of the March 18, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting 3. Negative Declaration No. 86-3 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 18, 1986 a) With Negative Declaration No. 86-3 5. Permitted C4 Uses JWP:HZ:kla RCA - 4/21/86 -3- (4632d) 0 1 Z 3,5 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM COMMUNITY BUSINESS TO HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL LOCATED WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF YORKTOWN (ZONE CHANGE 86-3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone Case No. 86-3 wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such zone change is proper, and consistent with the general plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following described real property, generally located on the west side of Beach Boulevard and South of Yorktown Avenue is hereby changed from C2, "Community Business" to C4, "Highway Commercial:" The subject property is 70' in width and 280' in depth on the west side of beach boulevard known as the southerly 70' of block 2408 of East Side Villa Tract as recorded in Book 4, page 65 of miscellaneous maps within the County of Orange Recorder's Office. 1. 0 1 1 SECTION 2. Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 2 (Sectional District Map 2-6-11) is hereby amended to reflect the change contained in this ordinance and on the map attached hereto. The Director of Development Services is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said district map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1986. ATTEST: City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ity Aam`i-distrat4gr Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney n Ole/ INITIATED AND APPROVED 2. BONING • DM 2 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6-II D '°°° SCALE IN FEET ADOPTED MARCH 7, 1960 NOTE ARE RY IFFY CITY CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 • Y E..E A E.- A T R10Nr OF WAY OF D1NEN510NS "IS MTENDED TO El).MD TD T. CENTER OF 4K O[D(�L$ 9RD x0 utEMO[D �[U!E ppq W. ar aucN mcr1T of -.60 �n ie� siai n is iin LEGEND: II-)-w ax0.61 Ix Tn 10 eV Q-n-n b-6TJ n-xz TJ-z0 Iew 16T6 ® augLE IIMILT RnroENrt gliRCT HUNTINGTON BEACH 6.941 1.J NT 11EA 6 •]-611. ,,T.�,wo 6Z 2w.2O6 64 �6i1 xIx ne -T-62 2JT w0 f-.-,] e-.-)] s-.-n .21n n-aA n-36 n-x TRAM-2 2000 2002 xoo) O 200. R2 TIED FAWLT RONAL C[ DISTRICT 0 ® COMMUNITY lAC1 LITIIS Il DI1CATIONALl 011—CT R] OFstX-R1pFE39OMY. OgTRLT ]-z1.62 t•.-62 2.a f03 2.e 7- E-)-T6 T6.0. �-OT 20N 2062 Q R[a10lNTUL AORRZILTURIL gaTRIR AY D 2y[ W! O23 1 6 m-„ RF.,f-, 2)f1 1,3:U 26f fx m 2.2 f36 .- n 6-T-Ia T6-12 T6.1] 2065 20T0 0 LIDNT 11OUSTRML MTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, C A L I F O R N I A '-16 w-S 2.n -T-tl I, zee w) t-T-» T6-If zwJ Q MOmE MOM[ gaTRIDT 9. -ez Q ! iis' 6 i. o 33. m ]. Te { .M1�)e a xp09. Q CONMMTY sY IN DISTRICT I.,- "1" e2.12 2595 1-)-tl t2-1t 1-l-tl 62•If 2]9T h`.al - - q-S-6. SJn 9T6 R3 qw A.11T6 -21-N I - )-TT »-■ -22 T6.2. 210T 212t 21a] ® MID~ COMMERCIAL ( qJ LIYT[D MpLTMLE iAYLT RE90EwE OgTRlOT 0 2.9 -a-65 24,66 ]OS 1152 }.] 1tl p-6-T6 T6-. 21)] -.-K __21T1 NE1OlOIIN000 COIMIOM:IAL OS-66 fi6.0 1x36 6-6-T) TT•1 21e0 ® MULTIRLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2.1T-tl 6e-16 M)0 h20iT 11-6 2202 ® COMMUNITY FACILITIES ICry l DISTRICT 2-IT�9 RF6i9 Y-52 6923 117 11-�]-T8 RRATh1 }1e?MTI--'RM-tI--llDY832 2129 SETS AC[ LRM: �\ RIEl M'ITN OL RRODII[TgN IO+f->0 -Ih)1 Ii-2W1 n-10 1. To-ze Itls 1- a 1691 ` 1'-TT - -Ta s-9-TT 'T-J6 a-z 21S(1 ztn 22 i1 M QGFICRQWI•A Q-I'-TT TI 16 2 -161F1 1 w_T N-T) I9I--zo-T-1J s TTM2 ® QUALIFIED QASS CCIVIC DISTRICT —®--am06M0.11KN 1GARFIELD 1 AVE .I L )a e/]��_]\ z �'I Ala ..1.. onL, nl7' IJ S1 rl .ISI" � '° Imo; 1 Cal + ms I _L l./ Im r— ADAMS L :1 + 1 Ie ZE&_5 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP 3-6-I I Emorl C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 0 C-1 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-3 (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 19 r 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) On February 19, 1986 the Planning Commission continued action on Zone Change No. 86-3, a request to redesignate a 0.43 acre parcel located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, south of Yorktown Avenue from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel. On March 4, 1986, the Planning Commission approved Code Amendment No. 86-8 and recommended adoption to the City Council. A City Council public hearing for the proposed code amendment is tentatively scheduled for April 7, 1986. This revision to the Ordinance Code pertains to motel development. Specifically, minimum lot size and frontage would be increased from 9,000 square feet, 70 foot frontage to 20,000 square feet, 100 foot frontage. The subject property is approximately 18,900 square feet and 70 feet wide. If the code amendment is adopted by the City Council, the site being considered for the zone change would not meet the minimum standards for developing a motel. Even though the parcel would not qualify for motel/hotel development if the City Council adopts the proposed revisions to the ordinance code, staff still considers this property as a good site for C4 (Highway Commercial) development. 0 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Elmer Allen (property owner's son) submitted a short letter to the Commission and some photographs of the site and announced that he was in support of the proposed zone change and would be available to answer any questions. Bob Corona, Consultant, spoke in support of the project. He stated that after personally doing a study of Beach Boulevard he feels that a motel is very desirable at this particular site. He feels the proposed project will be very attractive and compatible with the surrounding area. Chandulal Patel spoke in support of the project. He stated that the proposed motel would be a Quality Inn and that the project had to also meet all of their requirements. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the project and the public hearing was closed. The applicant was asked if it was clear to him that if the Code Amendment concerning motels was passed by the City Council and if his zone change was approved that a conditional exception would have to be applied for first before approving his project. He stated that he did understand everything that would be required. 0 PC Minutes - 3/18/86 -3- (4535d) The Commission was concerned that the applicant might be misled by the granting of a zone change. He was informed that he would have to go through the proper entitlement process for approval on his project. He said that he fully understood the process and would proceed on a step by step basis. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY ERSKINE TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-3 WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-3: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject property as General Commercial; therefore the requested C4 zoning is consistent with the General Plan Designation. 2. Commercial development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are similarly developed. • C-2 APPEAL OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT'S APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-6 Conditional Exception No. 86-6 is a request to maintain an existing garage with zero foot (0') side yard setback on the south side and a side yard setback on the north side in lieu of the required five foot (5'). The garage is necessary as part of a duplex addition to the existing single family residence for a total of 3 units on the site. On February 19, 1986, the Board of Zoning Adjustments approved the request based on certain findings and conditions of approval with the modification that the garage be setback 3 feet from the south property line in lieu of the requested zero foot setback. The applicant concurred with this condition since the garage would still comply with the minimum parking dimensions for a two car garage. The Board's decision was appealed by two Planning Commissioners, Richard Rowe and Grace Winchell, because of their concerns regarding the impact of the existing garage, with its reduced side yard setbacks, upon adjacent neighbors; the establishment of a precedent for the neighborhood; and the controversial nature of the request. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exempt by Class 1, Section 15301 under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. PC Minutes - 3/18/86 -4- (4535d) srA f f *huntington beach development services department EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: February 19, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE t4O. 86-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-3 APPLICANT_: Chandulal Patel 19091 E. Colima Rd. Rowland Hts., CA 91748 PROPERTY Florence G. Dale OWNER: 19551 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA REQUEST: To permit a change of zone from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) ACREAGE: .043 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTIOt': DATE ACCEPTED: February 12, 1986 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: April 11, 1986 GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial ZONE: C2 (Community Busines Approve Zone Change No. 86-3 and recommend its adoption to the City Council. 2.0 GFNERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-3 is a request to rezone 0.43 acres of property located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, south of Yorktown Avenue from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: General Commercial C2 (Community Business) Vacant General Commercial C4 (Highway Commercial) Retail shopping center A•FM-23A • U South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: General Commercial C2 (Community Business) Retail Commercial Medium Densiy Residential C2 (Medium Density Residential) Apartments (Across Beach Boulevard) General Commercial C2 (Community Business) Huntington Lanes Bowling Alley Negative Declaration No. 86-3 evaluates the environmental effects of Zone Change No. 86-3. Prior to any action on the request for a change of zone, the Planning Commission must take action on the negative declaration and make its recommendation to the City Council. .0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Redevelopment staff has indicated that Beach Boulevard is within their study area. Any future projects proposed in this area should be reviewed by their office. 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Plot applicable. 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Zone Change No. 86-3 is a request to redesignate a 0.43 acre site located on the west side of Beach Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of Yorktown Avenue from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a 35 unit motel. The C4 district is "generally intended for land and structures to provide hotels and motels for transients and vacation visitors with convenient access along heavily traveled highway frontage." Highway Commercial Zoning (C4) is further intended to provide controlled commercial uses on a highway location where it is not detrimental to adjoining property development. Staff Report - 2/19/86 -2- (4237d) • • The site is presently designated as General Commercial on the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan. A zone change from C2 to C4 (Highway Commercial) would continue to maintain consistency with the General Plan. Further, because the site is 70 x 270 it does meet the minimum requirements for hotel/motel requirements. Staff is in the process of preparing a code amendment to increase the minimum site area for hotel/motel development. We can support the C4 (Highway Commercial) designation along Beach Boulevard as requested by the applicant because it is in an area that is predominantly zoned C4. However, staff does not intend this to be considered as an endorsement of a motel development. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Zone Change No. 86-3 after taking action on Negative Declaration 86-3 and recommend its adoption to the City Council with the following findings: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the subject property as General Commercial; therefore the requested C4 zoning is consistent with the General Plan Designation. 2. Commercial development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are similarly developed. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Zone Change Pao. 86-3 based on the following findings: 1. The applicant's intended motel development for the subject site will not be compatible with adjacent residential properties to the west. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area map 2. Site plan, elevations 3. Ordin ce 4. VNeg ive Declaration 86-3 JWP Staff Report - 2/19/86 -3- (4237d) PLANNINu ZONING DM 2 NOW SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 2-6-11 =-� I NOTE- sowlto "ARCH T. r$so . •.. •.Nt••a.• ." . Ittr f J CITYOF Ctt♦ COUNCIL 0A01wANCt MO tf» •.• It`•t b<..» •.• •»r• n ••• » .r1•nD ,0 ,.rM.p r4 •ti CI •r1• 1 �rM •D[L (QS+S PDrS �.Q Sf(p j�tj( �� N IE •�Oo rv, � 1 •i n�ii � n - LTEGEND' L ! rt p w.! r •�r 4'• rf o s •, n rt r> to N1f »n J /r»al r•.Kf ff»l.Q tffi.Kf I—ILTNTII�TGTON 13EAGI I .. �.w..w •.�. ••. •' !o0]'D• Nl m foo f r• u !•• ..., ..., .. rf • •:., . •• n f. ,-10 w 10 •:n t w D• N. toW NDf eu.. 1 r ... r.r. .1Y01.C1 d...x, Qt� CDrrVrr�r• W-1»1-1DVC•rp.YrD•f r•K' Li� vrct +. asc... pnrK, ...°n -W-'.S �tt•.r•• 'S! • ! O,», u•4I •D• t•1 .1 fMff,1 • ••w • rr . r• w�or .•'t — tM.•-f .10 [� •run rrr. •O•KfIrPY o»••Kr .»Y.r rrg.Vrlr_d.•frK1 .• COUNTY, CALIFORNIA o• 1•.. .n o • rr. 1 .•1 • r. a tNtoNf m •D ,!. fn •2.11 • • Mr• f • ton 10tANGE K. es1 K•yr ! °Oi"'"'•caw,•L,Y owruu �-, a At it.. fn on f r w 1. xr tvi tt?; r�•^J1 _ • ::_ o» rlfr : s �e ri :� u» wwrY I•u+».c�n lf•el+cl s», •t• I f u_ •• t!•• an� ,�ii Mf rr ql wr.•nVt�1� i ir; �✓,n •—� �--� < f �• N rtt! Y �j r. • tr•rr r• • •• 1 !tYTftOrrNr•• tf r•4'rff �_�+.. C•_t.tr j •.•rr • o • it ff �. Y Y i L. 1t ,rK • - ,�� o i '• n fi•r i w �: a m. rtr , i� arlrl: n•far ©+N� �.•rr a f•wr+.; J IGARFIELD 1 I I �_ RA 0 MI o I o RA-0 MI c RA-0 Vl 3 i W (1 u I p �o.Vr — t h C, � R2 k R2 r it r] •r.»rr, �sW .. «w r• if t]!• , [[=i C'•" D»i•Kr ���QD•rNr N1V(R� / — -- -- — J :— — AVEL r I; R2 �...I: 'I MI -A I — - I I,,.,t, �; C2 R2 M I :M2-01 :R2 . �Z I IPLAN p$T9 [T C2-0-CD a .... lr.r i• R3 _ .r .. %'— iL- _ J—� iwLt.: 0 POr ~a , o �' I �R4 IR R2 R2 It-- ► A• R2-0.I" ]D R2 I C2-0-CD is C2-0RI �I,.. 1N i 11 RI IL— :Gct-ym?S 7 •. yCJD•r,LL. :" •.� r: ,ra!� - _•w , �. w�K_. i • Ir'�SD� . � P^-'LIC.fr Vl+• e; � :70 �� R2 R C2- 0-CD G wm• CF-ELcD; CF-E CF-E-CD Y+ II tt�,,. CF- R s.o IF fl • • e , �1� _ cc 8 a �0! - yi {. RI-0 ` / RI vItr2.0•CD O ,� .' R5-0�D 4 R2-o-Po-c,� - R2_ I I � � � .r..t.•.!'r , � _� I sex r 1 R2-0-CD LJL--i L--1L-.]{ — 1�-1 ADAMS F R2 R2 K-- ] _fr 01R2-0 L2_0 , loll.] F.;;. Ib � I z J W 9 J L AVE ZoN E Gffi¢�cU� No • F6 - 3 IN,OCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA9 I. BACKGROUND 1. Applicant Chandulal Patel 2. Address 19091 E. Colima Rd. Rowland Hill _ 3. Telephone (818) 965-4023 CA �. Project Location _ _ __9f Yawn 5. Project Title/(lescript.ion Zone Change 86-3/Negative Declaration 86-3 0. Date -- 2_11�6 __ --- - - - --- - 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No X Other 2. Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No X 3. Im acts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, Vice, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact surrounding circulation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes _ Maybe No X 5. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities, natural resources, human health? Yes Maybe No X 0. Other potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). III. OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( X ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No X 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No X 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No X 4. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No X V. DETERMINATION ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Environmental Impact Report DATE 2— 12— 86 SIGNATURE • • PLANNING COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS S. 9470 ARTICLE 947 C4 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (822, 1194, 1340, 1366, 1494, 1549, 1600, 1852, 1952, 2503, 2773, 2791) S. 9470 Statement of Intent and Purpose S. 9471 Uses Permitted S. 9471.1 Motels and Hotels S. 9471.2 Yard Requirements for Dwelling, Hotels, Motel Uses S. 9471.4 Professional Services and Offices S. 9472 Use Permits S. 9472.1 All Commercial Uses Permitted in C2 S. 9472.2 Uses Subject to Conditional Use Permits S. 9473 Height Limitations - A11 Uses S. 9474 Off -Street Parking S. 9475 Dedication and Improvements S. 9470 STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE: ( a) This district is generally intended for land and structures to provide hotels and motels for transients, and vacation visitors with convenient access along heavily traveled highway frontage. Additional uses such as churches and professional services are likewise included. (b) It is further intended to provide controlled commercial uses on a highway location where it is not detrimental to adjoining property development. S. 9471 USES PERMITTED. The following uses shall be permitted in the C4 District subject to approval of an Administrative Review application by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. (1549-1/70) S. 9471.1 MOTELS AND HOTELS. (a) Minimum Lot Area: The minimum lot area for motels and hotels shall be 9000 square feet. (b) Minimum Frontage: The minimum frontage for motels and hotels shall be 70 feet. (c) Location and Access: All motels shall be located on and take vehicular access from an arterial highway. Said arterial highway shall be depicted on the *taster Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways. (1366) S. 9471.2 YARD REQUIRM-f ITS FOR MOTELS AND HOTELS: (a) Front Yard: The minimum front yard shall be five (5) feet. Parcels fronting on a State Highway shall be required to setback a minimum of fifty (50) feet from the ultimate right-of-way. (b) Side Yard: Interior: The interior side yard shall be five (5) feet. Exterior: The exterior side yard shall be ten (10) feet. 10/85 S. 2471.2(c) • COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS • PLANNING (c) Rear Yard: The minimum rear yard shall be five (5) feet, except where a permitted use abuts an R1 District, then a minimum rear yard of fifteen (15) feet shall be provided. S. 9471.3 Repealed — (Ord 1852-6/73) S. 9471.4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND OFFICES. Professional services may be located in professional business buildings. Professional offices are defined as offices for the conduct of any one of the following uses only: Accountant, architect, attorney, chiropractor, collection agency, dentist, engineer, insurance broker, optometrist, physician and surgeon, private detective, real estate sales, social -workers, surveyor and pharmacies. Diagnostic laboratories and biochemical laboratories that do not exceed fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet in gross area are permitted. (1340, 1600-9/70) S. 9471.4.1 YARD REQUIREMENTS. (1494) (a) Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback shall be ten (10) feet, except as otherwise designated on a sectional district map. (b) Side Yard. 1. Exterior Side Yard. The minimum exterior side yard setback shall be ten (10) feet, except as otherwise designated on a sectional district map. 2. Interior Side Yard. The interior side yard setback may be zero, except where permitted use abuts a residential district, in which case a minimum of ten (10) feet shall be provided. (c) Rear Yard. The rear yard setback may be zero except where the permitted use abuts a residential district, then the setback shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in the rear yard. S. 9471.4.2 DEVELOPHEPT STANDARDS. S. 9471.4.2.1 SITE AREA. (a) Minimum Building Site. The minimum building site area shall be six thousand (6000) square feet. (b) Minimum Frontage. The minimum frontage shall be sixty (60) feet. S. 9472 USE PERMITS. The following uses may be permitted in this district subject to an approval of a use permit application by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. (822, 1600 — 9/70) S. 9472.1 All commercial uses permitted in the C2, "Community Business District", subject to the same provisions regulating such uses. (822, 1340, 1600-9/70) 7/85 Ap 21i 8, 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO 86-3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, April 21, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P. M. SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 86-3 LOCATION: west side of Beach Boulevard approximately 200 feet south of Yorktown. PROPOSAL: A change of zone from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-3 will also be considered in conjunction with Zone Change 86-3 ON FILE: A copy of proposed Zone Change 86-3 is on file in the Department of Development Services ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 4/3/86 C� NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUUBLIC HEARING ITEM -,77E - Ce C�� TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: 2-/RA FROM: IxV �,AAy lG:s PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE 2 DAY OF 198 . AP's are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO informed of forthcoming public hearing? Refer to 4,--e yW Planning Department - Extension #ASS for additional information. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal. 0 2`,0 y , k HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEB 2 0 1986 P.O. E^x 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Zone Change No. 86-3 (Application Number) Date: Zone Change from CZ to C4 (Briet Description C. rr` j NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach n will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. ►ei L 2-1 DATE/TIME:-Bg--R-,�►4. - , 1986 APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change 86-3 APPLICANT: Chandulal Patel LOCATION: West side of Beach Boulevard approximately 200 feet southQf Yorktown. .tt 0 m ZONE: C2 (Community Business) zEV W REQUEST: _Change of zone from C2 (Community Business) to C4 D �' Mighv,ey Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a `- motel . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-3 has been filed. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed Zone Change No. 86-3 is on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If there are any further questions please call Howard Zelefsky , A&83s ant -/Associate Planner at 536-5271. James W. Palin, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission (0260D) Do m n M G M 0 Louis Hernand 8331 Tyler -Cir�_le Huntington BeachCA 92646 A.Y. No. 025-180-04 John F. Pelochino 117 Ocean Avenue Seal Beach, CA 90740 A.P. No. 025-180-21 Westchester Village 630 S. Glassell St. Orange, CA 92666 A.P. No. 025-180-22 Florence G. Dale 19551 Beach Blvd. Huntington BeachCA 92648 A.P. No. 025-191-02 State of California 120 S. Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012 A.P. No. 025-191-03 Mike V. Perez P.O. Box 1645 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 A.P. No. 025-191-21 Robert L.T. Smith 2015 E. Ocean Blvd. Balboa, CA 92661 A.P. No. 025-191-22 Thomas F. Wiley 24730 Cornstalk Rd. Lake Elsinore, CA 92330 A.P. No. 025-191-23 Lawrencv E. Okun 1031 Laurei Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 A.P. No. 025-191-24 Frank E. Puccilli 2402 Florida St. Apt. A Huntington BeachCA 92648 A.P. No. 025-191-25 Arling E, McCluer 21211 Richmond Circle Huntington BeachCA 92646 A.P. No. 025-191-26 Herlindo Con eras 704 Yorktown ..venue Huntington BeachCA 92648 A.T. No. 025-191-27 Ivan H. Hooker 154 Gumtree Dr. Rancho Cordoba, CA 95670 A.P. No. 025-191-36 Phillip G. Berg 1001 W. Whittier Blvd. La Habra, CA 906j1 A.P. No. 025-191-44 Marco Velastegui P.O. Box 5293 Huntington BeachCA 92646 A.P. No. 025-191-45 Winall Stations 3978 Cherry Avenue Long Beach, CA 90807 A.P. No. 153-051-16 City of Huntington Bch Ciy.t Hall Huntington BeachCA 92646 A.P. No. 153-051-17 Alfred F. Barillaro 19542 Beach Blvd. Huntington BeachCA 92648 A.P. No. 153-091-05 Beverly A. Baier P.O. Box 4349 Anaheim, CA 92803 A.P. No. 153-091-06 Spiegel Enterprises 2050 S. Bundy Dr.Ste.225 Los Angeles, CA 90025 A.P. No. 153-091-17 W.T. Newland Estate 17890 Sky Park Circle Irvine, CA 92714 A.P. No. 153-091-19 z c Y,- -.? CHAIva ULAL K• PATE[. AD 1909 / E. Coc.rroA Rv. leow i.r9-A= tirt 11 CA• 9/74yg DAILY PILOT PUBLISH DATE LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. 2835 "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM COMMUNITY BUSINESS TO HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL LOCATED WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF YORKTOWN (ZONE CHANGE 86-3)" czl/",CFS-,�� Ordinance No. 2835 amends S. 9061 District Map 2 to change the Zone from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the purpose of constructing a motel on property located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, approximately 200 feet south of Yorktown av-enue. THE FULL TEXT CF THE RD IVa�,CE IS .AV.A ILAHE' IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE r t. �' J - -J t' � ACCP,ED by one � �! until cr ne Ci_�� or Huntington each a an regular meeting he.Id �cnday. 19 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmen: NCES: Councilmen: ABSENT: Councilmen: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk v enterzpafses -= - inc_ April 30, 1986 Ms. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 86-3 West side of Beach Boulevard - 200 feet south of Yorktown Dear Ms. Wentworth: We would be interested in obtaining the results of the Public Hearing and the name and address of the current owners of the property that is going to be developed on Beach Boulevard, south of Yorktown. Your assistance in having this sent to our office will be appreciated and if there is a cost for this, please let me know. Yours very truly, VILLELLI ENTERPRISES, INC. Franklin D. Brynt FDB/cld 1001 W N'mmer Rl.d . La Haura. California 90631 / (213) 691-3237 / (714) 526-2291 Soath 500 Jefferson, Suite 161-H, Spokanc. N"A 9920+ / (509) 747-6579-5966 County Road 234. Durango, Colorado 81301 ' (303) 247-2713 a 0 Page 5 - Council Minutes - 4/21/86 AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Finley, Mandic, Green, Thomas NOES: None ABSENT: Bailey PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE 86-3 - FAILED - ORD NO 2835 - INTRODUCTION FAILED The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider Zone Change 86-3, a request to change the zoning on property gener- ally located on the west side of Beach Blvd. approximately 200 feet south of Yorktown, from C2 (Community Business) to C4 (Highway Commercial) for the pur- pose of constructing a motel. The Mayor stated that Negative Declaration No. 86-3 would also be considered in conjunction said zone change. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. In response to a question from Council, the Director of Development Services stated the property would not meet the minimum standards for developing a motel. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Robert Corona, Corona Development Company, stated he spoke for the applicant. He stated there was 19,000 square feet of property so they were only 400 feet off. He urged Council to approve the zone change. Chandulal Patel described the motel they hoped to develop and urged Council to approve the zone change. Kathy Sella stated that Mrs. Dale, the property owner, would like to rezone the property to C-4. She stated Mrs. Dale would like to move away from Beach Boulevard to a residential area. Martha Velasteguyn, property owner on the north side of the property, stated her concern regarding which direction the motel would be facing. She was con- cerned trash would be thrown to the roof of the shopping center. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2835 for Council consideration - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING FROM COMMUNITY BUSINESS TO HIGHWAY COM- MERCIAL LOCATED WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF YORKTOWN (ZONE CHANGE 86-3)." Page 6 - Council Minutes - 4/21/86 Discussion was held regarding future plans for developing Beach Boulevard as a Super Street. A motion was made by Kelly, seconded by Thomas, to approve Negative Declara- tion No. 86-3 and Zone Change No. 86-3 and, after reading by title, approve introduction of Ordinance No. 2835. The motion failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Thomas NOES: MacAllister, Finley, Green ABSENT: Bailey PUBLIC HEARING - CODE AMENDMENT 86-6 - APPROVED - ORD NO 2834 - INTRODUCTION APPROVED- AGRICULTURE & RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the repeal of existing Article 960 and 961 and the addition of new Article 910 related to the Residential Agriculture Zone District. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Director of Development Services presented a staff report. The change in the building height from thirty feet to twenty-five feet was discussed. The Mayor declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. The City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2834 for Council consideration - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDI- NANCE CODE BY REPEALING ARTICLES 960 AND 961 AND ADDING THERETO NEW ARTICLE 910 ENTITLED "RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE DISTRICT." A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Kelly, to approve Code Amendment No. 86-6 and, after reading by title, approve introduction of Ordinance No. 2834 as amended by deleting Section 9105 pertaining to maximum building heights. The motion failed by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister NOES: Kelly, Finley, Mandic, Green, Thomas ABSENT: Bailey A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Thomas, to approve Code Amendment No. 86-6 and, after reading by title, approve introduction of Ordinance No. 2834. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Finley, Mandic, Green, Thomas NOES: Kelly, MacAllister ABSENT: Bailey i REQUE ' FOR CITY i COUNCIL ACTION t Submitted to: Submitted by: Date October 6, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator c. Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Service p Subject: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ZO E CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Consistent with Council Policy? J>eYes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:MID STATEMENT OF ISSUE: On August 4, 1986, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's denial of a proposed 96-unit senior citizen project. The decision was continued to October 6, 1986, to allow the appellant an opportunity to meet with staff to revise the plan in conformance with -SR and condominium standards. RECOMMENDATION: ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL, ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2,WERE DENIED WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Livengood, Erskine ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. The proposed senior citizen condominium project increases the density and will not be compatible to the intensity of existing residential developments in the vicinity. 2. The proposed senior citizen condominium project will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach since the project does not comply with the regulations of the Huntington Beach Ordinance because of increased building bulk, and number of bedrooms per gross acre. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 96 unit condominium project will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons living in the vicinity and to the property and improvements because of the intensity of the use proposed. 4. The proposed senior citizen condominium project does not comply with provisions of Articles 932.5 and 936 (new Articles 915 and 917). 01 PIO 4/84 aow L F FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. The mix of units with a majority of two bedrooms creates an excess in the number of bedrooms allowed per gross acre. Allowed 117, proposed 172. (A comprehensive recheck reveals the correct number of bedrooms allowed to be 109.) 2. The exterior elevations do not provide sufficient variation in roof heights and slopes as well as building offset to reduce the building bulk. 3. More than six dwelling units attached side by side are proposed, thus creating a greater building bulk than allowed by the code. 4. The proposed encroachment into the setback from the adjacent single family residential development will be detrimental to those persons residing in the vicinity. 5. The project is not enhanced by the requests for special permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 based on the findings and conditions as shown in the Alternative Action section in this report. ANALYSIS: Applicant: Lee and Yolanda Collins Serge Zweibel, Bob Zweibel, Evelyn Shabo 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, California 90241 Appellant: Same as applicant Location: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard Request: To change the zone from (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR and to construct a 96 unit senior condominium project with request for special permit. DISCUSSION: On July 1, 1986, the Planning Commission denied Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 after being continued from April 1, May 6, and June 17, 1986 meetings. The request for special permits include 172 bedrooms in lieu of 117 allowed, reduction in RCA - 10/6/86 -2- (6289d) P� • number of handicap units, reduction setback, and building bulk (length, variation). A 50% density bonus is Council continued the appeal hearing revise the plan. in interior property line building offset, and roof -line also requested. The City decision to allow time to Staff met on August 8 and August 27, 1986, with the appellant's building designer to discuss bedroom type, building height, building setback, and building bulk. A revised plan was submitted September 16, 1986, depicting building height and setback from property lines in conformance with senior suffix and condominium standards. The building length, facade, roof line has been revised to provide variation in design and building bulk. The number of bedrooms has been decreased from 172 to 162. A comprehensive plan check pursuant to current regulations revealed the correct density increase to be 62% (96 units proposed, 59.15 units allowed with 109 bedrooms). Staff has made additional recommendations to the appellant's designer to further decrease the number of bedrooms to 128 and reduce the height of the wing buildings. The applicant/appellants agreed to the decrease in bedroom count and will submit a revised floor plan prior to the meeting. Attached is an analysis of the proposed plan and the previous Request for Council Action. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days and no comments, either verbal or written, were received. On July 1, 1986, the Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 86-2. Prior to action to approve the Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit appeal, it is necessary for the City Council to review and adopt Negative Declaration No. 86-2. FUNDING SOURCE• Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 based on plans dated September 16, 1986, and subject to the findings and conditions as outlined. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings and Conditions of 2. Analysis of Proposed Plan 3. Request for Council Action JWP:SP:kla Approval dated August 4, 1986 RCA - 10/6/86 -3- (6289d) 0 0 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates subject property as Medium Density Residential; therefore, the Senior suffix is consistent with the General Plan Designation. 2. Senior residential development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are similarly developed. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. The proposed development will promote better living conditions and environments. 2. The proposed development utilizes land -planning techniques which include tasteful types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 3. The proposed development will benefit the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood and the City in general, and will not be a detriment to or degrade property values in such neighborhood and the City. FINDINGS FOR DENSITY BONUS: 1. The capacities of the City and County water, sewer and storm drain systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 2. The proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. 3. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Through the use of the special permit, the proposed development of a 96 unit senior residential housing complex is in compliance with all of the City's development standards for this type of housing and is consistent with the zoning on the subject property. 2. The proposed senior residential project on 2.41 gross acres is proposed to be developed having a density of 39.83 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the senior residential suffix regulations and General Plan. 3. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and through the use of special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision will be in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinance. 0 Iq SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated September 16, 1986, shall be revised to reflect 128 bedrooms. (Unit B changed to 1 1/2 bathrooms, den and 1 bedroom.) and three units relocated from the third story of each north -south wing to each east -west building. Said revisions shall be approved by the Director of Development Services. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. The Landscape Plan shall come back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The landscape plan shall also be submitted to the adjacent single family development's homeowner's association for review and recommendations of the landscape buffer adjacent to the R1 property. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. c. Development Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Council and recorded in the Orange County Recorder's Office pursuant to the Government Code and those procedures adopted by the City Council for such agreements (Resolution No. 5390). The development agreement shall include a program to insure that adequate provision has been made to insure that each unit shall be occupied by at least one person sixty years of age or older. d. Rodent eradication plan, approved by the Orange County Vector Control District. e. Grading and Drainage Plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (grade not to exceed one-half percent). f. Hydrology plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. g. A copy of the recorded final map to the Department of Development Services and Public Works. 3. The development agreement shall be prepared incorporating the allowable density, conditions of approval, and 62% density bonus to be for low and moderate income and distributed equally between the two buildings; 1/3 for one bedroom, 1/3 for one bedroom and den, and 1/3 for two bedroom units. \J • 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 5. Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 shall become effective on the effective date of implementing ordinance for zone Change No. 86-2. 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. 7. An automatic sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout the complex. This includes parking structure and buildings. 8. A wet combination stand pipe system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed in all stairways. 9. An automatic alarm system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout. The system shall include the following features: a. Water flow and valve tamper detection b. Trouble signal c. Voice communication d. Graphic annunciation e. Manual pulls 10. Elevators shall be sized 6' 8" wide by 4' 3" deep to accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney. Elevators shall be provided on all floors including subterranean parking level. 11. Any proposed trash chute locations and systems shall be approved by the Fire Department. 12. Fire lanes are to be posted and signed to comply with Fire Department standards. 13. All roads are to be installed prior to the commencement of the combustible construction with all weather driving surfaces constructed to the standards and specifications of the Public Works Department. 14. Water supply shall be capable of providing 4,000 gallons per minute for fire flow. 15. Fire extinguishers shall be provided within 75 feet of travel lanes. Type of extinguishers and locations must be in accordance with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards. 16. Any security gates and fencing proposed for installation shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Department. 0 • 17. The subject properties shall enter into an irrevocable driveway and parking easement. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Development Services. 18. The CC&R's and association rules shall set forth provisions to prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles on designated open parking spaces within the project. 19. Prior to the recordation of a final map, the CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services for review, to assure compliance with all applicable conditions of approval and to the Attorney's Office for review as to legal form. 20. Dedicate on -site water system to the City of Huntington Beach. 21. On -site sewers shall be private. 22. Intensified landscaping shall be provided in all areas to within 20 feet of the property line adjacent to the existing single family dwellings. This landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 23. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots and recreational areas and shall be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas. 24. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 25. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 26. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 27. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 28. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 29. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, steets, and utilities. 30. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. (6289d) ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 PLANS DATED 9/16/86; CHECKED 9/18/86 Subsequent to the City Council appeal public hearing, the zoning code has been revised. The project is subject to SR (Article 917) and PRD (Article 915). Ordinance code numbers appear in parenthesis. Section Issue Required Proposed 9170 General Provision Conceptual Plan Plan submitted (932..5.3) Development Agreement (932.5.4) 9172 Maximum Site 50% = 48,827 max 39,698 sq.ft. (932.5.10) Coverage (2 lots combined) (2 lots combined) 9173 Maximum Height (932.5.13) 9174 Open Space (932.5.19) 9175 Special Permit (932.5.21) 9176 Design Standards (932.5.9) a. Min. Floor area (932.5.8) b. elevators (932.5.14) c. building bulk •(932.5.11) d. Building separation 9177 Parking (932.5.15) 9178 Density Bonus (932.5.22) base zone = 35 ft. a. clubhouse @ 672 sq.ft. patio/balcony 1 bdrm. = 60 2 bdrm. = 120 b. main rec. area 1 @ 2,500 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. required 3 2 ' 6 " 19' southerly wing 2 @ 750 square feet 2 @ 4,070 creditable area necessary as noted by • 600-800 sq.ft. provided 180 ft. max. length; facade and roof provided variation 17.5 ft. side to side 15 and 20 3 story building 30- 1 bdrm. @ 1.0 = 30 34-*l bdrm. + den @ 1.5 = 51 32- 2 bdrm. @ 1.5 = 48 Total 129 126 **50% max. by Council 62% Policy = 29.6 units 36.85 units bonus bonus * 34 proposed as 1 bedroom plus den = 2 bedrooms ** "Affordable Housing Policies" adopted by City Council ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED PLAN (Continued) Section Issue Required 9150.4 *Maximum Density R2 @ 15 x 1.26 = 18.9 Net Site Area + 7-1/2% of Site R4 @ 35 x 1.15 = 40.25 Total 377T5 Maximum Bedrooms R2 @ 38 x 1.26 = 47.88 R4 @ 53 x 1.15 = 60.95 Total 108.83 9150.7 Front Setback 20 ft. avg. with 15 ft. min. dim. 9150.7 Side Setback 10 ft. 9150.9 Rear Setback 10 ft. - east 22 ft. - west Proposed 48 48 96 64 64 128 22 ft. to living space 15 ft. deck 21 ft. unit 24 ft. 24 ft. *Site area determined by adding to the net site area the square footage to center lines of street up to a maximum of 7 1/2 percent of the total net site. (6289d) Page 2 - Council Minutes - 8/4/86 for the purpose of drilling oil wells. Subject property is located on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway between Magnolia and Newland Streets. Negative Declaration No. 84 -33 assesses the environmental impact of said zone change. The public hearing on this matter was continued open from April 21, 1986 to allow review of the "White Hole" report by the Planning Commission and City Council. Said appeal was readvertised with renotification as directed by Council. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. The Director of Development Services presented a staff report. He stated that Mr. Curtis was willing to change the drill site to another locp Lou and that Mr. Curtis indicated he would request a two week continuance to o._low him time to obtain a legal description of the new location. Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner, presented a staff report. Discussion was held between Council and staff regarding whether the matter should be referred back to the Planning Commission. William Curtis, owner of the gas and oil sub -lease, stated he was willing to move the drill site to a location near Magnolia Street and the flood control. Michael Martin stated he would like to postpone his testimony until he saw the e zact plans of the new location. Bill Wiseman, President of the Friends of the Huntington Wetlands, stated he believed an oil well would be detrimental to a wetland area. Following discussion, a motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister, to continue the open public hearing to August 18, 1986 to consider of Zone Change No. 84-15 and Negative Declaration No. 84-33. The motion carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Bailey NOES: Mandic, Green ABSENT: Finley, Thomas Councilwoman Bailey suggested that an ordinance with the new legal description be prepared for the next meeting. PUBLIC FEARING - DECISION CONTINUED TO 10/6/86 - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF ZONE CHANG9 56-21CUP 86-2 - 96 UNIT SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT - COEL11W-_ ZWEIBEL The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Lee & Yolanda Collins and Serge Zweibel to the 5 Page 3 - Council Minutes - 8/4/86 Planning Commission's denial of a change of zone from (Q) R2-P D (Qualified Medium Density Residential - Planned Development) to R2 ZR (Medium Density Residential -Senior) and to allow 96 senior citizens condominium units with request for special permit. The Mayor stated that Negative Declaration 86 -2 would also be considered by Council in conjunction with said appeal. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. Susan Pierce, Associate Planner, presented a staff report. The Mayor declared the hearing open. John Cowles, representing an architectural firm for Collins Zwei---1, referred to a letter dated July 2, 1986 regarding findings for denial. a presented staff with a rendering showing modifications to the exterior eleva ions. Evelyn Zweibel stated she was speaking on behalf of her father who was ill and in the hospital. She reviewed the history of the project and stated their firm just wanted what had been promised in 1982. Michael Collins referred to promises made in a 1982 agreement with their firm. He described his proposal to concede points such as modifying the exterior of the building and adding additional shrubbery. Richard Palkovic, Tom McKnight, Victor Brown - President of the Woodtree Home- owners Association, Joanna Johnson, Ted Noland - Huntington Village Estates, Terry Grzecka and Richard Thompson spoke in opposition to the project. Councilman Thomas arrived at the meetine at 8:50 P.M. Discussion was held between Council and John Cowles and Michael Collins regarding setbacks and number of bedrooms. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Discussion was held regarding renotificatioa of the project, the 1982 partici- pation agreement, number of units under R-2 and R-4 zoning regulations, set- backs, height, and requirements of the -SR suffix. A motion was made by Kelly, seconded by Bailey, to continue to October 6, 1986 consideration of Zone Case No. 86 -2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86 2 and to direct the appellant to work with staff and plan the project to meet requirements of -SR and condominium standards with proper setbacks and to review height as related to the 20' setback. The motion carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Bailey, Thomas NOES: Mandic, Green ABSENT: Finley 6 C REQUES t" FOR CITY COUNCIL- - ACTION Date August 4, 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra r W- Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services 444dkv Subject: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception #�� Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change No. 86-2, a request to change the zone from QR2-PD to R2-SR, and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, a request to construct a 96 unit senior condominium project with request for special permit. The appeal was filed by the applicants. RECOMMENDATION: ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL, ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 WERE DENIED WITH FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Livengood, Erskine ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. The proposed senior citizen condominium project increases the density and will not be compatible to the intensity of existing residential developments in the vicinity. 2. The proposed senior citizen condominium project will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach since the project does not comply with the regulations of the Huntington Beach Ordinance because of increased building bulk, and number of bedrooms per gross acre. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 96 unit condominium project will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons living in the vicinity and to the property and improvements because of the intensity of the use proposed. 4. The proposed senior citizen condominium project does not comply with provisions of Articles 932.5 and 936. PIO 4/84 0 • FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. The mix of units with a majority of two bedrooms creates an excess in the number of bedrooms allowed per gross acre. Allowed 117, proposed 172. 2. The exterior elevations do not provide sufficient variation in roof heights and slopes as well as building offset to reduce the building bulk. 3. More than six dwelling units attached side by side are proposed, thus creating a greater building bulk than allowed by the code. 4. The proposed encroachment into the setback from the adjacent single family residential development will be detrimental to those persons residing in the vicinity. 5. The project is not enhanced by the requests for special permit. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the action of the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: The staff recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 based on the findings and conditions as shown in the Alternative Action section in this report. ANALYSIS: Applicant: Lee and Yolanda Collins Serge Zweibel 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, California 90241 Appellant: Same as applicant Location: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard Request: To change the zone from (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR and to construct a 96 unit senior condominium project with request for special permit. DISCUSSION: On July 1, 1986, the Planning Commission reviewed Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 after being continued from April 1, May 6, and June 17, 1986 meetings. The request for special permits include 172 bedrooms in lieu of 117 allowed, reduction in number of handicap units, reduction in interior property line setback, and building bulk (length, building offset, and roof -line variation). A 50% density bonus is also requested. RCA - August 4, 1986 -2- (5708d) The proposed project consists of two 48 unit buildings, each with a private recreational area, and reciprocal access and open parking. The structure's architectural elements are compatible with existing senior residential buildings in the vicinity. Sufficient parking has been provided to satisfy the bedroom count; however, staff recommended additional parking spaces be covered. Staff feels the items for special permit would not have a negative impact upon the surrounding properties. The "Q" requirement of the existing zoning for a 20 feet setback from adjacent R1 development is less restrictive than the development standards which require additional setback based on the building height and/or length. (24 feet required for building under 30 feet in height and 85 feet required for building over 30 feet). A change of zone to R2-SR will remove the requirement for a planned development and allow senior housing with increased density provided the bonus units are made available for persons of low and moderate income. A motion to approve the project failed because of the concern regarding a 50% density bonus, the large bedroom count, and the building bulk. A subsequent motion for denial succeeded based on findings as indicated under Planning Commission action. Major concerns of the Planning Commission were: 1) the length of the building, lack of front elevation variation, and roofline did not create an aesthetically pleasing project; and 2) 79% of the units were proposed as two -bedrooms and may be too intense a project to allow a 50% density bonus. Subsequent to Planning Commission denial, petitions requesting denial have been submitted by the adjacent R1 homeowners. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days and no comments, either verbal or written, were received. On July 1, 1986, the Planning Commission approved Negative Declaration No. 86-2. Prior to action to approve the Zone Change and Conditional`Use Permit appeal, it is necessary for the City Council to review and adopt Negative Declaration No. 86-2. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 subject to the following findings and conditions: RCA - August 4, 1986 -3- (5708d) I.i findings for Tentative Tract 11955 l.' This proposed 14.7+ acre subdivision divided into 7 lots: 6 for \ene al purposes and 1 for industrial purposes, will be elopedin accordance and in compliance with the established and land uses as depicted in the City's-current General 2. erty was previously studied for this intensity of land e t::ne t:e land use designation for high density al and industria: were placed on the subject property. -andiA oroval for Tentative Tract No. 11955 1. The tentati tract received and dated March 27, 1986, shall be the approved entative tract. 2. Sewer, water an fire hydrant systems shall be subject to the City's standard fans and specifications as adopted by the City Council. 3. Easements for water aci'_ities shall be dedicated to the City of iuntington Beach and hall be located in the private streets. 4. Water wells shall be ab doned per the City of Huntington Beach's standards. 5. A storm drain system snail b ccnstructed from Tract 8197 (located at the south border of :,o= 2) nd connect to the existing storm drain at Talbert Avenue and Kov cs Lane. 6. A 10 foot easement for the storm rain shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Reach on Lot 2. 7. Sewer easements in private streets sha 1 be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. S. Street improvements shall be installed per Public Works standards. 9. All landscaping along Talbert avenue shall be 'nstalled on private Property. No trees will be planted in the park ay, but will be incorporated in the adjacent onsite landscape pl 10. Except where private entrance drives intersect Talb rt Avenue, vehicular access rights to said streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11. Street 'A' shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. :NDTNGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE N-D. 86-2: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates subject property as Medium Density Residential; tierefore, the Senior suffix is consistent with the General Plan Designation. .30 .3 i Staff Report - 7/1/86 -7- (5524d)_ ._tom z��� Senior resident" development of the compatible with rrounding land uses 110 similarly developed. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL P°R M: T: sub �t site will be beca#se these proper 1. The proposed development •gill promote better living conditions and environments. 2. The proposed development -utilizes land -planning techniques which include tasteful types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 3. The proposed development will 5-nefit the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood and the City in general, and will not to a detriment to or degrade property values in such neighborhood and the City. ?INDINGS FOR DEENS�7TY BONUS: 1. The capacities of the City and County water, sewer and storm drain systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 2. The proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. 3. The character of: to surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. FINDINGS - COND:":CNA_ US ?SRM:T NO. 86-2: 1. Through the use of the special permit, the proposed development of a 96 unit senior residential rousing complex is in compliance wit.. all of the City's development standards for this type of housing and is consistent with the zoning or. the subject property. 2. The proposed senior residential project on 2.60 gross acres is proposed to be developed raving a density of 36.9 units per gross acre, which is consistent with tie senior residential suffix regulations and General Plan. 3. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and through the use of special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision will be in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State yap Ac: and supplementary City subdivision ordinance. k, .3� Staff Report - 7/1/86 -8- (5524d) COND 1TION5 Cor difi6oM4 use ��.,- r� i'�' NO -P41M""eS FOR APPROVAL - NO. 86-2: 1. Site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 24, 1986, shall be the aproved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. The Landscape Plan shall come back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The landscape plan shall also be submitted to the adjacent single family development's homeowner's association for review and recommendations of the landscape buffer adjacent to the R1 property. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. C. Development Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Council and recorded in the Orange County Recorder's Office pursuant to the Government Code and those procedures adopted by the City Council for such agreements (Resolution No. 5390). The development agreement shall include a program to insure that adequate provision has been made to insure that each unit shall be occupied by at least one person sixty years of age or older. d. Rodent eradication plan, approved by the Orange County Vector Control District. e. Grading and Drainage Plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (grade not to exceed one-half percent). f. Revised parking management plan to reflect assigned space within the secured areas and no more than 200 ft. at the respective unit, and handicap parking for the handicap unit. g. Plans for Recreation Buildings to the Department of Development Services for review and approval. h. A copy of the recorded final map to the Department of Development Services and Public Works. 3. The development agreement shall be prepared incorporating the allowable density, conditions of approval, and 50% density bonus to be for low and moderate income and distributed equally between the two buildings in proportion to the unit type provided. RCA - August 4, 1986 -4- (5108d) 4. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 5. Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 shall become effective on the effective date of implementing ordinance for zone Change No. 86-2. 6. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (27') in width and shall be of radius type construction. 7. An automatic sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout the complex. This includes parking structure and buildings. 8. A wet combination stand pipe system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed in all stairways. 9. An automatic alarm system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout. The system shall include the following features: a. Water flow and valve tamper detection b. Trouble signal c. voice communication d. Graphic annunciation e. Manual pulls 10. Elevators shall be sized 6' 8" wide by 4' 3" deep to accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney. Elevators shall be provided on all floors including subterranean parking level. 11. Any proposed trash chute locations and systems shall be approved by the Fire Department, 12. Fire lanes are to be posted and signed to comply with Fire Department standards. 13. All roads are to be installed prior to the commencement of the combustible construction with all weather driving surfaces constructed to the standards and specifications of the Public Works Department. 14. Water supply shall be capable of providing 4,000 gallons per minute for fire flow. 15. Fire extinguishers shall be provided within 75 feet of travel lanes. Type of extinguishers and locations must be in accordance with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards. 16. Any security gates and fencing proposed for installation shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire Department. RCA - August 4, 1986 -5- (5708d) 17. The subject properties shall enter into an irrevocable driveway and parking easement. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Development Services. 18. The CC&R's and association rules shall set forth provisions to prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles on designated open parking spaces within the project. 19. Prior to the recordation of a final map, the CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services for review, to assure compliance with all applicable conditions of approval and to the Attorney's Office for review as to legal form. 20. A minimum separation between structures and the project boundaries shall be no less than 20 feet adjacent to existing residential areas. Where the separation is less than 20 feet, structures siding on the setback shall receive special treatment by the elimination of doors and windows on the second and third floor units. Also special treatment shall be given to the roofline and landscaping in the setback areas. 21. Intensified landscaping shall be provided in all areas to within 20 feet of the property line adjacent to the existing single family dwellings. This landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 22. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots and recreational areas and shall be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas. 23. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 24. Low -volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 25. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. 26. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 27. If lighting is included in the vapor lamps shall be used for lighting shall be directed to properties. parking lot, high-pressure sodium energy savings. All outside prevent "spillage" onto adjacent RCA - August 4, 1986 -6- (5708d) • • 28. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, steets, and utilities. 29. If foil -type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Appeal letter dated 7-9'K 2. Planning Commission Meeting minutes dated 7/l/86, 6/17/86, 5/6/86 and 4/l/86. 3. Staff report dated 7/l/86. 4. Petitions. • .. RCA - August 4, 1986 -7- (5708d) 10 to 367/7It O iC44r�. Planning Divi6ion Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach Ref: Denial of N.D./#8b-2, Z.C.f#80'-2, and C.V.P.j#,96-2 July 9, 1986� AtGni Floren,e Webb �erlior P1dnn��r Dear Florence, This letter is for thtf purpose of requesting an appeal of the above Keference Denial to the first avail- able meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council. The reasons we feel justified for requesting an appeal are as fo11ows: 1) The toff Report frorn the Planning Department and Redevelopment Agency to the Planning Comm- ision recommended approval ot' this project. 2) the proposed dev:?looment is, consistent with both the land -use element and 9enerai plan of the city. 3) The proposed clev,:lupment is very cornpatable with the surrounding development recently constructed in this area. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at your convenience. Respectfully Yours, . 1078 a BEACH - TALBERT VILLAGE ' 16-1606 J %x Y yC 1220 PAY TO THE tTy �rMI�UJb(r% ! � ORDER OF _. D LLARS WIISHIRELACIENEGAOFMCE C LLINS-ZWEIB L 3 CITY NATIONAL BANK 8420 WLSHIRE BLVD. RNMYHILLS, CALIFORNIA 90211 FOR _ ._11■001G_'_B11R--r:L220L60661: 002olIL2327 11' • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK August 8, 1986 Lee and Yolanda Collins Serge Zweibel 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, CA 90241 CALIFORNIA 92648 Attached please find a Statement of Action of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach pertaining to your appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Zone Change 86 -2 and Conditional Use Permit 86 -2. The City Council contin- ued consideration of the matter to October 6, 1986. Zf you have any questions regarding the matter please contact Jim Palin, Director of the Development Services Department at 536-3271. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:es Enclosure cc: Jim Palin, Development Services Director (Telephone: 714-536-5227 ) STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Monday, August 4, 1986 Mayor Mandic called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:30 P.M. Present: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Green Thomas (arrived 8:50 P.M.) Absent: Finley PUBLIC HEARING - DECISION CONTINUED TO 10/6/86 - APPEAL TO PC DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE 6- CUP 6-2 - 6 UNIT SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING PROJECT - COLLINS- ZWEIB EL The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Lee & Yolanda Collins and Serge Zweibel to the Planning Commission's denial of a change of zone from (Q) R2 -PD tQualified Medium Density Residential - Planned Development) to R2-SR (Medium Density Residential -Senior) and to allow 96 senior citizens condominium units with request for special permit. The Mayor stated that Negative Declaration 86 -2 would also be considered by Council in conjunction with said appeal. The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publi- cation and posting had been met, and that she had received no communications or written protests to the matter. Susan Pierce, Associate Planner, presented a staff report. The Mayor declared the hearing open. John Cowles, representing an architectural firm for Collins Zweibel, referred to a letter dated July 2, 1986 regarding findings for denial. He presented staff with a rendition showing modifications to the exterior elevations. Evelyn Zweibel stated she was speaking on behalf of her father who was ill and in the hospital. She reviewed the history of the project and stated their firm just wanted what had been promised in 1982. Michael Collins referred to promises made in a 1982 agreement with their firm. He described his proposal to concede points such as modifying the e xterior of the building and adding additional shrubbery. Richard P alkovic, Tom McKnight, Victor Brown - President of the Woodtree Home- owners Association, Joanna Johnson, Ted Noland - Huntington Village Estates, Terry Grzecka and Richard Thompson spoke in opposition to the project. Councilman Thomas arrived at the meeting at 9:50 P.M. Page 2 - Statement of Action of the City Council Discussion was held between Council and John Cowles and Michael Collins regarding setbacks and number of bedrooms. There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. Discussion was held regarding renotification of the project, the 1982 partici- pation agreement, number of units under R-2 and R-4 zoning regulations, set- backs, height, and requirements of the -SR suffix. A motion was made by Kelly , seconded by Bailey, to continue to October 6, 1986 consideration of Zone Case No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 and to direct the appellant to work with staff and plan the project to meet"A requirements of -SR and condominium standards with proper setbacks and to review height as related to the 20' setback. The motion carried by the fol- lowing roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Bailey, Thomas NOES: Mandic, Green ABSENT: Finley ******************************************************************************* Mayor Mandic adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at 1:00 A.M. to Tuesday, August 12, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. in Room B-8, Civic Center. ATTEST: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and a x-vfficio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Robert P. Mandic, Jr. Mayor County of Orange ) City of Huntington Beach) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 4th day of August, 1986. WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 8th day of August, 1986. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and a x-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California BY Deputy /—eY Publish 7/23/86 /_ f NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 (9fi-Unit Senior Citizen Housing Project) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a .-public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, August 4, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-2/Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 - Appeal APPLICANT: Lee and Yolanda Collins/Serge Zweibel LOCATION: south of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard PROPOSAL: An appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of a change of zone from (Q)R2-PD (Qualified Medium Density Residential - Planned Development) to R2-SR (Medium Density Residential -Senior) and to allow 96 senior citizens condominium units with request for special permit. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-2 will also be considered by Council in conjunction with said appeal. ON FILE: A copy of legal description and copies of the proposed applications are on file in the Department of Development Services Office. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 w July 17, 1986 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 8.6-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 (96-Unit Senior Citizen Housing Project) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach cfimts-q-i-aa will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. i�;V �cst 4, DATE/TIME: it----, 1986 - 7.30 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 86-2/Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 "' T�t vP Txazt_- Y APPLICANT: Lee and Yolanda Collins/Serge Zweibel LOCATION: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard ZONE: R45(High Density Residential -Senior) and (Q)R2-PD (Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development) P'l cc4a'j3X-.QA_ REQUEST: o� � g7hange of zone from (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR (/(Medium Density l� Residential -Senior) and to allow 96 senior citizens condominium units with -request for special permit. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 86-2 ON FILE: A copy of the proposed applications are on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Susan Pierce, Associate Planner at 536-5271. dares W. Palin,-See-re-ta-r-y - Huntington_ Beach Planning -Commission J� (4405d-1) AW- Anthony Avila 3rd 29805 Rustic Oak Laquna Niguel, CA 92677 A.P. No. 159-271-55 Myles P. O'Reilly 7846 Lori Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. No. 159-271-56 Max E. Benward 18175 Sharon Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-271-57 1kintington Village 17171 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A.P. No. 159-271-62 Huntington Village 17171 Beach Blvd. Iluntingtan Beach, CA 92647 A.P. No. 159-271-63. Huntington Village 17171 Ae-ach Blvd. Huntin(Tton\Beach, CA 92647 A.P. No. 159-271-64 Frank J. Iti.clumnd 16942 Agate Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 A.P. No. 159-271-68 Wind ki.ver Tradinq Co. 7962 loth St. #200 Westminster, CA 92683 A.P. No. 159-271-69 Jack Haley 16812 I-'acific Coast Ilwy. Sunset Beach, CA 90742 A.P. No. 159-271-70 Jack Haley 1.6812 Pacific Coast Hwy Sunset Beach, CA 90742 A.P. No. 159-271-71 Jack Maley 16812 Pacific Coast Hwy. Sunset Beach, CA 90742 A.P. No. 159-271-72 Iaszi.o Kovacs 4645 E. Pacific Coast Ilwy. Lana Beach, CA 90804 A.P. No. 159-291-01 Redevelopment Agency of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-291-14 Robert A. Brover 10122 Stonybrook Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 A.P. No. 933-87-131 Susan J. Lagro 18252 Parkview Ln. #201 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-132 Orrin O. 1 el tsch 18252 parkview Ln. #102 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-133 Margaret C. O'Connor 18252 Parkview In. #202 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-134 R. Warford 8391 I)eppcliff Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 A.P. No. 933-87-135 0 Catherine B. Osborne 18252 Parkview Ln. #203 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-136 Robert N. Elliott 18252 Parkview In. #104 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-137 Q,arles E. DeCYow 1.8252 Parkview En. #204 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 9.33-87-138 Gaudencio B. Florentino 1.8252 Parkview I.n. #105 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-139 Demas E. (;&Drqe 18252 Parkview Ln. #205 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-140 Itilton P. McIntosh 19611 Sardinia In.. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 A.P. No. 933-87-141 Gerald Mapson 2407 Plaza La Playa San Clemente, CA 92672 A.P. No. 933-87-142 Arthur L. llibben 20031 Mayport Ln. Huntington Beach, Ut 92646 A.P. No. 933-37-143 Lorietta M. Wce 18252 Parkview In. #207 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-144 ZI-1 Laland M. Bemier Dee C. Hartman Richard F. Woolman 18252 Parkview In. #108 18242 Parkview In. #204 18262 Parkview Ln. #101 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntinqton Beach, CA 92648 fluntinqton Beach,.,CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-145 A.P. No. 933-87-154 A.P. No. 933-87-163 Ethel Durcell Donedl A. !,Ieir Bruno W. Tietz 18252 Parkview 1-11. 9208 401 20th St. 18262 Parkview Ln. 11201 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-146 A.P. No. 933-87-155 A.P. No. 933-87-164 Howard A. Davidson Mary C. Flaherty Joan E. Elison 18242 Parkview Ln. #101 18242 Parkview Ln. #205 1.8262 Parkview In. #102 Ifunti.ngton Beach, G'1 92648 Ifuntinqton Beach, CA 92648 Iluntin(Tton Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-147 A.P. No. 933-87-156 A.P. No. 933-87-165 Pay Bramlett James O. Turner Mary Fran Doyle 9741 Kings Canyon Dr. 18242 Parkview Ln. #106 18262 Parkview Ln. #202 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 fluntington Beach, CA 92648 fluntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-148 A.P. No. 933-87-157 A.P. No. 933-87-166 I -inns B. Buss Marilyn Cortun Anne B. l%blbers 18242 Parkview Ln. 4102 18242 Parkview Ln. #026 18262 Parkview Ln. 0103 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-149, A.P. No. 933-87-158 A.P. No. 933-87-167 .tilary M. Fuller James F. Cavener Andre C.. Bourrie 18242 Parkview Ln. #202 18242 Parkview in. 0107 666 Pawley Rd. Iuntington Beach, CA, 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 A.P. No. 933-87-150 A.P. No. 933-87-159 A.P. No. 933-87-168 Robert M. Hoover Barbara H. Miller Thomas J. O' ilagan 18242 Parkview rn. #103 18242 Parkview Ln. #207 18262 Parkview Ln. #104 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Ifuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-151 A.P. No. 933-87-160 A.P. No. 933-87-169 Ernest F. Forthel a-)n E. Marvel James R. Mason 18242 Parkview Ln. 0203 18242 Parkview Ln. #108 18262 Parkview In. #204 Huntington Beach, C-A 92648 I{untington Beach, CA 92648 Ihu►t.ington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-152 A.P. No. 933-87-161 A.P. No. 933-87-170 Linda J. Nbnsen Bernadette L. Carroll Burton L. Wilborn 18242 Parkview Ln. #104 18242 Parkview I.n. #208 18262 Parkview In. #105 Ifuntington Beach, CA 92648 fluntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-153 A.P. No. 933-87-162 A.P. No. 933-87-171 27 Irvin J. Webster lose Gibbons 18262 Parkview tn.- #205 18232 Parkview In. #102 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-172 A.P. No. 933-87-181 Ruth P. Koob Andre L. Baca 18262 Parkview in. #106 18232 Parkview In. #202 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-173 A.P. No. 933-87-182 Richard R. Newcomb Joseph B. Branick 508 Karen Dr. 18232 Parkview In. #103 Prescott, A7 86301 (hmtington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. Vo. 933-87=174 A.P. No. 933-87-183 Noboru Endo Grace F. Narita 18262 Parkview In. #107 18232 Parkview In. #203 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-175 A.P. No. 933-87-184 Ann E. Cloud Dolores E. Killer 18262 Parkview In. #207 18232 Parkview In. #104 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-176, A.P. No. 933-87-185 John L. Taylor Ursula Zobel 18262 Parkview In. #108 18232 Parkview In. #204 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 funtington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-177 A.P. No. 933-87-186 Joseph D. Kelly Sol)ritt M. Bliss 18262 Parkview In. #208 10203 Nightingale St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 A.P. No. 933-87-178 A.P. No. 933-87-187 Fugene J. Pratte Irene Krivicky 6552 Bolsa Ave. 18232 Parkview In. #205 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-179 A.P. No. 933-87-188 William Lyon Co. Vernon Lee Dell 18232 Parkview Ln. #201 18232 Parkview In. #106 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-180 A.P. No. 933-87-189 C William Lyon Co. 18232 Parkview In. #206 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-190 Doris C. Capps 18232 Parkview In. #107 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-191 Newell Snack 18232 Parkview In. #207 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-192 Irene Higgins 18232 Parkview In. #108 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 933-87-193 William Lyon Co. 19 Corporate Plaza Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 A.P. No. 933-87-194 23 Redev. Agency of Iuntington Collins -Zweibel Development Robert J. Warner Beac 231 �.S. Gale Dr. 7842 Talbert Ave. 2000 Main Beverly Bills, CA 90211 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington Elea CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-0 A.P. No. 159-141-61 A.P. No. 159-141-82 George R. Knapp Leroy B. Collins Kaiser Foundation health 650 Cordova, Apt. 12 231 � S. Gale Dr. 1515 N. Vermont Ave. #615 Pasadena, CA 91101 Beverly Bills, CA 90211 Los Angeles, CA 90027 A.P. No. 159-141-37 A.P. No. 159-141-65 A.P. No. 159-141-83 Collins -Zweibel Development Leroy B. Collins Woodfxee Dev. Co. 23�_1$ S. Gale Dr. 231 � S. Gale Dr. 1665 Placentia Ave. Bevel Bills, CA 90211 Beverly I{ills, CA 90211 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 A.P. No. 159 41-38 A.P. No. 159-141-66 A.P. No. 159-141-87 Collins -Zweibel Development Leroy B. Collins Edward Burlingame Hill 231 � S. Gale Dr. 231 � S. Gale Dr. 18176 Sharon Ln. Beverly Bills, CA 90211 Beverly Ifills, CA 90211 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-39 A.P. No. 159-141-68 A.P. No. 159-271-09 feroy B. Collins Rd ev. ` Agency of Huntington David L. CamnIx-M 231 � S. Gale Dr. Beach 18172 Sharon Ln. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-40 A.P. No. 159-141-70 A.P. No. 159-271-10 Leroy B. Collins Redevelopment Agency of James L. Johnson 231 � S. Gale Dr. Ifuntincrton Beach 18162 Sharon Ln. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 2000 MaiiT St. Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 Ifuntington'Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-41 A.P. No. 154-141-71 A.P. No. 159-271-11 Collins -Zweibel Development Redevelopment Agency_ of James L. Manarrich 231 � S. Gale Dr. Huntington Beach 18156 Sharon Ln. Beverly [fills, CA 90211 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-42 A.P. No. 159-141-74 A.P. No. 159-271-12 Collins-Zwiibel Develot.vent Redevelofarent Agency of Mark G. Borgatta 231 � S. Gale Dr. Huntington Beach 18146 Sharon Ln. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 2000 Main St. funtington Beach, CA 92648 Ifuntington'Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-43 A.P. No. 159-141-79 A.P. No. 159-271-13 Maclovio P. Aranda Collins -Zweibel Development Barbara A. Skinner 7842 Talbert 231 -� S. Gale Dr. 7865 Lori Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Beverly Ifills, CA 90211 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A.P. No. 159-141-50 A.P. No. 1 9-141-81 A.P. No. 159-271-14 Ho HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Charles W. Thompson City Administrator Subject ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL COMPARISON ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 — APPEAL From Development Services Date July 30, 1986 Attached is a comparison of the adjacent residential developments within the Talbert -Beach Redevelopment area and a map depicting the project areas. JWP:SP:kla ATTACHMENT CUP 83-9 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL COMPARISON CUP 83-9 Project Redev. Agengy Redev. Agency/ Senior Apts. Senior Apts. and Condos and Condos Zone R4-SR R4-SR Number 96 Condos 96 Condos Units 212 Apartments* 164 Apartments 308 Total 260 Total Unit Type: Studio 36* 1 Bedroom 224* 2 Bedrooms 48 Total 8.7* Acreage Density 35.4 Average* CUP 82-27 wooatree Condominiums (Q)R2-PD 54 32 0 180 12 48 42 7.4 3.6 35.14 Average 15 39.05 Apts. only 30 Condos only Parking: Required 237* 208 129 Provided 265* @ 0.86/unit 127 @ .49/unit 133 @ 2.4/unit CUP 86-2 Collins -Zweibel Senior Condos R4-SR and (Q)R2-PD 96 0 20 76 W. 36.9 Average 38.7 R4 only 35 R2 only 134 134 @ 1.4/unit *Includes 48 units approved, not constructed, and now included on R4-SR portion of Conditional Use Permit 86-2. ( 54783d ) • • 0 UGt�UUWS �vmoq (REVISED) �%OTD ,�L__ ,•� C Mill F�, �I d �tz4i `II III , art..../ �II`I��IIII;IIlIIII� f ..rlllll�rrrrrrrrl�Ill�rllrr� rj .iii t�,;1'1,�,;,lrlllll�lllllids,;1;11;1;1;rJ:1;,;,;;I,�JI/'`!r� 01 ,;;� .... s J I ' 1 - 1 ,. art sr.•o. wo n. ,tu .r•. wo n. ,ru `rns a n•m .a.c. r . r .rat ve r r•a � :.vt,o nn•snaa+rn o.rfr. s.w . 4 nr•a V .f>r,lL•. �4t,•` a4m 1t •r:a ®O �/ m ,f. `w M1 � asm.�0. R al sii•a �oanr s rts: s ofn1 srrl..._,. ,• ILUI.- tfxs*SI• ratter. err w �u •f..a •ttR. •tt� as fmtfft�.Ipa rn an • • I ♦ +.e1D amr ... �.+uw r •.a Lam 11b L R6r'J. r. .ralntrf .aR. ratttttoa .. ­m M. aan•.ita •i3:i•lia �� - L M.. ,R ) • Y • C • 1 O ,L Y ,R alv w fOii � /.®YM1. 11' t C f I — PIRA it W as.u13 r •`a ll tta. r. �h� �aO (~r= �J --� � - -- > f I iWIImm �f•R. Yam L ��. Ltl IrY �I.O r0 � IIfO.lfv I. T—== i- .—^`—�: _ = r— f=r��_ 4. rs, >.nv ta„a,• ma •Yfn f�1��� �1"_ i J. BOA, LDS I I L flYCUa P.. .. -r..v rr.ay I L fit r.f-: 11 r. fC,- K,IK al O�`ti :i•i7a y�•c 1....� .• �w LI na rrr c.r,• � .rrr. sc• , ,RJ{/!CT >Y/71 �� L ,I LOR VICIMIrY JAt !t/O •III CUP 13— 9 C at AIII =findings for Ten_ative Tract acc 11955 f 7 1. This proposed 14.7+ acre subdivision divided into 7 lots: 6 for residential purposes and 1 for industrial purposes, will be eveloped in accordance and in compliance with the established nsities and land uses as depicted in the City's-current General P an. 2. Thi property was previously studied for this intensity of land use t the :i.ne t e land use designation for high density resid ntial and industrial were placed on the subject property. onditions o� Approval for :'entative Tract No. 11955 1. The tentative tract received and dated March 27, 1986, shall be the approv d tentative tract. 2. Sewer, wa=er and f1re ^ydrant systems shall be subject to the City's standa d pians and specifications as adopted by the City Council. 3. Easements for wa�er facilities Shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington 5each nd shall be located in the private streets. 4. Water wells shall a abandoned rer the City of Huntington Beach's standards. S. A storm drain system nail be constructed from Tract 8i97 (located at the south border of Lo= 2) and connect to the existing storm drain at Talbert Avenue and Kovacs Lane. 6. A 10 foot easement for th storm drain shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Reach o Lot 2. 7. Sewer easements in private stNree`_s shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. \ 8. Street improvements shall be insNalled per Public Works standards. 9. All. landscaping along Talbert Avenu shall be installed on private property. No trees +ill be planted N the parkway, but will be incorporated in the adjacent onsite la scape plan. 10. Except where private entrance drives inters ct Talbert Avenue, vehicular access rigts to said streets shall a dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11. Street 'A• shall be dedicated to the City of Hunting on Beach. _`1D:NGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates subject property as Medium Density Residential; tierefore, the Senior suffix is consistent with the General Plan Designation. .10 •3� Staff Report - 7/l/86 -7- (5524d) 2. Senior resident�I development of the i compatible with urrounding land uses similarly developed. FINDINGS ?OR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERM: T: subct site will be because these propert 1. The proposed development will promote better living conditions and environments. 2. The proposed development utilizes land -planning techniques whip-, include tasteful types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 3. The proposed development will b-nefit tM e general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood and the City in general, and will not be a detriment to or degrade property values in such neighborhood and the City. FINDINGS FOR DENSITY 3ONUS: 1. The capacities of the City and County water, sewer and storm drain systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 2. The proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. 3. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. FINDINGS - CONDITICNAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Through the use of the special hermit, the proposed development of a 96 unit senior residential housing complex is in compliance wit. - all of the City's developmenc standards for this type of housing and is consistent with the zoning on the subject property. 2. The proposed senior residential project on 2.60 gross acres is proposed to be developed having a density of 36.9 units per gross acre, which is consistent with tie senior residential suffix regulations and General Plan. 3. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and through the use of special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision will be in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Nap Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinance. l .3� Staff Report - 7/1/86 -8- T (5524d) • o' s including public notices by Decree of the Super or Go of Orange County. California Number A-6214 dated 29 Seplomber. 1961. and j' A-24831 dsteC it .tune. 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange >ubl,a NOIKI Aoveflll a cowrea b, IM OW4111Yll ,8 /M Y1 ) pCMq .nn 10 p.ca I ok~ MOM I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years. and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS -PRESS. a news?aper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine. the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of JULY 23 , 198 6 198 , 198 , 198 198 l declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. ,-Executed on July 23 1 198 6 at C sta Mesa, lifornia. Signature KKIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. W2 /CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. M2 f6-UMt Senior Citizen Housling Projieet) NOTICE IS HEREBY' GIVEN that the Huntington Beech City Council will hold a public hearing In the Coun- cil Chamber at the Hunt- Ington Beach Clvlc Center, 2000 Main Street, Hunt- Ington Beach, California, on the date and at the time In- dicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the appil- cation described below. DATE: Monday, August 4, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 88-2/Con- ditional Use Permit No. 8&2 - Appeal APPLICANT: Lee and Yolanda Collins/Serge Zweibel LOCATION: south of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard PROPOSAL: An appeal to --MIC NOTICE the Planning Commisslon's denial of a change of Zone from (Q)R2-PD (Qualified Medium Density Residential - Planned Development) to R2-SR (Medium Density Residential-Senlor) and to allow 96 senior citizens con- dominium units with respect for special perrnit. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declar- ation No. 86-2 will also be considered by Council in conjunction with said ap- peal. ON FILE: A copy of legal description and copies of the proposed applications are on flle In the Department of Development Services Of- fice. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evlderloe for or against the application as outlined above. All appll- cations, exhibits, and do- wriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for InspWlon by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, Dr. Mole OIL Wentworth, City Clerk Phone (714) s36-¢I1116 Dated July 17, 1986 Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot July 23, 198B W273 PROOF OF PUCLICATION C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: C-1 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. -2 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 1, 1986, MAT-6-,- 1986 AND JUNE 17, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS) Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior). Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 48 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and 48 senior residential condominiums on that property being rezoned to R2-SR. The property owners desire that development of each lot be identical. The conditional use permit analysis is based on the total project of 96 units. Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. All lots of this map have not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised tentative map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. The conditional use permit project is proposed on lots 2 and 3 of the revised tentative map. These applications have been continued from April 1, 1986, May 6, 1986, and June 17, 1986, Planning Commission meetings. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-2. Commissioners discussed Fire Department regulations which require additional turning radius adjacent to parking spaces 40 and 95 and may necessitate a revision in the unit or bedroom count to satisfy on -site parking. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ron Pattinson spoke on behalf of the applicant in favor of this project. He feels that Huntington Beach needs more affordable housing for seniors and that this proposal is a quality project and has been in the planning stage for years. John Cowles, architectural consultant for the project, spoke in favor of the project. He said that a lot of time had been spent working on this project. He concurred with staff's recommendation to cover an additional 17 parking spaces, and the handicap access unit reduction and building bulk reduction. He also indicated his willingness to move two parking spaces east and west to resolve the turning radius problem as mentioned by the Fire Department. There were no other persons to speak for or against the proposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners discussed the 50% density bonus allowed on this project. Commissioners felt this 50% density bonus was a critical issue due to the large bedroom count on this project. Staff responded that this project is "for sale" units instead of rental. Commissioners expressed concern at the large number of 2-bedroom units for this project. Commissioners felt perhaps a better mix of 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units would have been more advisable for this project. Commissioners were concerned about this project's building height, length and bulk. Commissioners questioned staff's method of designating and identifying bedrooms. Commissioners suggested that the item be trailed to allow staff sufficient time to prepare findings for denial to incorporate Commissioners' concerns regarding bulk, bedroom count, and setback.. When the item was resumed, staff read the prepared findings for denial to the Commissioners. A MOTION WAS MADE 3Y LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ERSKINE, TO REINSTATE TENTATIVE TRACT #11955, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES None ABSENT: Schumacher ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Porter ABSENT: None , ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILS A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY ERSKINE, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY WINCHELL, TO DENY ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 WITH FINDINGS AS OUTLINED BY STAFF, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Livengcod, Erskine ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11955 1. This proposed 14.7+ acre subdivision divided into 7 lots: 6 for residential purposes and 1 for industrial purposes, will be developed in accordance and in compliance with the established densities and land uses as depicted in the City's current General Plan. 2. This property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for high density residential and industrial were placed on the subject property. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955 1. The tentative tract received and dated March 27, 1986, shall be the approved tentative tract. 2. 'Sewer, water and fire hydrant systems shall be subject to the City's standard plans and specifications as adopted by the City Council. 3. Easements for water facilities shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach and shall be located in the private streets. 4. Water wells shall be abandoned per the City of Huntington Beach's standards. 5. A storm drain system shall be constructed from Tract 8197 (located at the south border of Lot 2) and connect to the existing storm drain at Talbert Avenue and Kovacs Lane. PC Minutes - 7/1/86 -5- (5583d) U 6. A 10 foot easement for the storm drain shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach on Lot 2. 7. Sewer easements in private streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 8. Street improvements shall be installed per Public Works standards. 9. All landscaping along Talbert Avenue shall be installed on private property. No trees will be planted in the parkway, but will be incorporated in the adjacent onsite landscape plan. 10. Except where private entrance drives intersect Talbert Avenue, vehicular access rights to said streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11. Street "A" shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. The mix of units with a majority of two bedrooms creates an excess in the number of bedrooms allowed per gross acre. Allowed 117, proposed 172. 2. The exterior elevations do not provide sufficient variation in roof heights and slopes as well as building offset to reduce the building bulk. 3. More than six dwelling units attached side by side are proposed, thus creating a greater building bulk than allowed by the code. 4. The proposed encroachment into the setback from the adjacent single family residential development will be detrimental to those persons residing in the vicinity. 5. The project is not enhanced by the requests for special permit. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. The proposed senior citizen condominium project increases the density and will not be compatible to the intensity of existing residential developments in the vicinity. 2. The proposed senior citizen condominium project will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach since the project does not comply with the regulations of the Huntington Beach Ordinance because of increased building bulk, and number of bedrooms per gross acre. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 96 unit condominium project will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons living in the vicinity and to the property and improvements because of the intensity of the use proposed. PC Minutes - 7/1/86 -6- (5583d) • • 4. The proposed senior citizen condominium project does not comply with provisions of Articles 932.5 and 936. C-2 CON ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-26 (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 3, 1986 PLA ING COMMISSIO MEETI On June 3, 986 the Planning Commission continued Conditional Use Permit to th July 1\with 1986 meeting to allow the staff additional time to review thitions of approval and complaints submitted by area residents. ional Use Permit No. 86-26 is a request to permit the construcf two shade houses measuring approximately 140 feet x 216 feet aeet x 216 feet on property presently being used as a wholesale If approved by the Commission, the shade houses will provideed light for ornamental plants. The proposed shade houses will imum of ten feet in height and will be set back a minimum of 2f om all properties developed residential. The two shade housesbe onstructed with shade cloth spread over steel posts anchorco Crete and connected by wire. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exe pt Class 1 Section 15302 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Commissioners discussed the Ma 27, 1986 letter from property owners. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Commissioners discussed and read i to the record the compromise between Woodhall Growers and the ad cent residences of Huntington Beach. Tim Woodson, applicant, spoke in suppor of the project. He addressed concerns mentioned in the compromise. Anna Kushnir, adjacent property owner, spo a in opposition to the project. She read to the Commissioners com \hoses s from Mayor Mandic's letter. She objected to the shade houses bonly 20' from her residential wall and stated that the shade would obstruct her view. There were no other persons to speak for or agai\forrowing oposal and the public hearing was closed. Commissioners mentioned that last year this businsidered small scale and now applicant is asking for mores. Staff responded that these additional shade houses werng purposes only and that no wholesale or retail sales wouldd from this property. Commissioners discussed measures taken to preven'n this area. PC Minutes - 7/1/86 -7- (5583d) ..= 0 • ROVED 7/1/86 • MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 1986 - 7:00 PM PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P ROLL CALL: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, P P (arrived at 7:05) Mirjahangir, Porter (left at 10:00 PM) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: A-1 Minutes of 5/20/86 Planning Commission Meeting MOTION BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 5/20/86 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: Erskine MOTION PASSED A-2 Minutes of 6/3/86 Planning Commission Meeting MOTION BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 6/3/86 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMISSION ITEMS: B-1 Commissioner Rowe stated that since the City Council has acted • on the temporary sign issue he wished to rescind his appeal request to the Board of Zoning Adjustments approval of temporary pennants at Wilson Ford (Administrative Review 86-37). • . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: C-1 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE ECLARATION NO. 86-2 IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVISED TENTATIVE NG COMMISSION MEETI The applicant is requesting a two week continuance to allow additional time to prepare the development agreement required for the zone change and completion of plans. At the May 6, 1986 Planning Commission meeting the applicant verbally waived the mandatory. processing date. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There was no one present to speak for or against the project. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY ERSKINE, TO CONTINUE, AT THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2 IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 11955 TO THE JULY 1, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, C-2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-21/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-25 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 86-12 CONTINUED FROM MAY 20, 1986 AND JUNE 3, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS) On June 3, 1986, the Planning Commission continued Conditional Use Permit 86-21 in conjunction with Conditional Exception 86-25 and Coastal Development Project 86-12 as requested by the applicant to facilitate additional time for negotiations with adjacent property owners for possible lot consolidation purposes. The applicant is requesting another continuance to the July 15 Planning Commission meeting due to continued negotiations. Waiver of the mandatory processing time has been agreed upon by the applicant. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED There was no one present to speak for or against the project. • r1 • PC Minutes - 6/17/86 -2- (5500d) r • APPROVED - 5/20/86 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers - Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California TUESDAY, MAY 6, 1986 - 7:00 PM PL DGE OF ALLEGIANCE P P P P P P ROLL ALL: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, P \ Mirjahangir A. CONSENT CALENDAR: None, B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMISSION ITEMS: None. C. PUBLIC HEAnNG ITEMS: C-1 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #11955/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior). Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 48 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and 48 senior residential condominiums on that property being rezoned to R2-SR. The property owners desire that development of each lot be identical. The conditional use permit analysis is based on the total project of 96 units. Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. All lots of this map have not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised tentative map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. The conditional use permit project is proposed on lots 2 and 3 of the revised tentative map. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pu.rsuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration. No. 86-2. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED The applicant requested that this item be continued until a June meeting date. The applicant's agent, John Cowles, was present at the meeting and waived the mandatory processing date. There were no other persons present to speak for or against the project and the public hearing was closed. A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY ERSKINE TO CONTINUE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 TO THE JUNE 17, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED C-2 REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-21 (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 15, 1986) Condit al Use Permit No. 85-21, a request to permit the storage and grindin of wood products (mulching operation) was approved by the Planning ommission on August 20, 1985. Since approval of Conditiona Use Permit No. 85-21, the applicant has failed to comply with nine c ditions of approval. At the April 1 1986 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission voted to contin e this item for two weeks to allow the applicant an opportunity to c ply with all applicable conditions of approval for Conditional Use Pe mit No. 85-21. On April 15, 1986, the Commission continued this item once again to permit the applicant additional time to comply with e conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. -50 was adopted by the Planning Commission on August 20, 1 5. The site has been identified as an archeological site. C Minutes - 5/6/86 -2- (5103d) 22. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an f-site facility equipped to handle them. 23. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or deta hed, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acous ical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL c ntours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under th supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustica engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 24. If lighting i included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps sh 11 be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall a directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 25. A detailed soils a alysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This ana sis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing o materials to provide detailed recommendations regar 'ng grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining alls, streets, and utilities. 26. If foil -type insulation i to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved b the Building Division. 27. The Planning Commission reser es the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any iolation of these conditions or of the Huntington Beach Ordinance ode occurs. 28. The security gate system must ope a minimum of 24 feet. The gates installation must comply with Fire Department Standard 403. 29. The turning radius from the central p king area to the parking area leading to the north and south areas must be a 17 foot by 45 foot turning radius. 30. Should any underground tanks be discovered on site, the tanks shall be removed to comply with the Orange County Environmental Health Standards. C-5 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior).. Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 96 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and that portion being rezoned to (Q)R2-SR. PC Minutes - 4/l/86 -13- (4599d) Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. This map has not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-2. Staff recommends continuance of this item to allow the applicant time to redesign the site layout. The applicant also requested a continuance to the May 6, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Tom McKnight, homeowner from adjacent neighborhood, was present to speak on the project but stated that he would return on May 5, 1986, to address the Commission. There were no other persons to speak for or against the project, however the public hearing was left open. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE, SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO CONTINUE ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 TO THE MAY 6, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MOTION PASSED Rowe, Winchell, Mirjahangir None None None Schumacher, Livengood, Erskine, Porter, C-6 ZONE`gHANGE NO. 86-5/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-7 Zone Change 86-5 is a request to rezone ft.) of proper located on the north side ft. east of Came on Avenue, from R5 (Office High Density Resi ntial). 0.16 net acres (7113.6 sq. of Newman approximately 219 Professional) to R3 (Medium :PC: Minutes �-4 1/86 -14- (4599d ) • • • • • huntington beach development services department GAFF EPOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: July 1, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE -CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2 APPLICANT/ Lee & Yolanda Collins OWNER: Serge Zweibel 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, CA 90241 AGENT: John Cowles 6480 Westminster Ave. Westminster, CA 92683 REQUEST: Zone Change (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR; CUP - 96 senior condominium units, LOCATION: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard IN CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT 11955 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment REQUEST: Reinstatement of Tentative Tract 11955, 7 lot subdivision LOCATION: South of Talbert, west of Beach Blvd. ACREAGE: 14.7+ m u DATE ACCEPTED: March 17, 1986 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: Waived by applicant ZONE: R4-SR and (Q)R2-PD GENERAL PLAN: Medium and High Density Residential EXISTING USE: Vacant ACREAGE: 2.60 gross acres DATE ACCEPTED: March 17, 1986 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE Waived by applicant ZONE:R4-SR, (Q)R2-PD, M1-A GENERAL PLAN: Medium and High Density Residential and Industrial EXISTING USE: Vacant and senior housing. C-1 A-FM-23A • 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Tentative Tract 11955, Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, and Negative Declaration No. 86-2 based on findings and conditions of approval outlined in this report. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior). Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 48 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and 48 senior residential condominiums on that property being rezoned to R2-SR. The property owners desire that development of each lot be identical. The conditional use permit analysis is based on the total project of 96 units. Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. All lots of this map have not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised tentative map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. The conditional use permit project is proposed on lots 2 and 3 of the revised tentative map. • These applications have been continued from April 1, 1986, May 6, • 1986, and June 17, 1986, Planning Commission meetings. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium and High Density Residential ZONE: (Q)R2-PD and R4-SR LAND USE: Vacant North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: (Q)R2-PD and R4-SR LAND USE: Condominiums East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C4 LAND USE: Commercial Staff Report - 7/1/86 -2- (5524d) • South of Subject Property: • GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Low Density Residential and General Commercial R1 and C4 Single family attached residential and commercial High Density Residential R4-SR Senior Apartments Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-2. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: • Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: • Redevelopment concurs with staff's recommendation. 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Pursuant to Subdivision Committee request, a revised tract map has been prepared depicting the necessary changes to the remaining 7 unrecorded lots. 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Revised plans were submitted on June 24, 1986. Analysis of the site plan has been provided below under the subheading of Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2. A draft development agreement and parking management plan have also been received as required by the Senior Suffix regulations. Staff Report - 7/1/86 -3- (5524d) The purpose of the SR suffix is to establish standards for • residential developments designed to house senior citizens. The senior residential development standards provide flexibility of design with consideration given to the proximity of the site to medical facilities, public transportation, shopping and like services. Lot 2 zoned R4-SR( Lot 3 zoned (Q) R2-PD) Lot Size: 1.24 gross acres 1.36 gross acres Density: 35 units x 1.24 = 15 units x 1.36 = 43.4 units allowed; 20.4 units allowed; 48 units proposed 48 units proposed Proposed Density Increase: 5 units (12%) or average 28 units (132%) or average 38 units per gross acre 35 units per gross acre Average Density Increase for Entire Project: 50% 36.92 units per gross acre (lots combined) Adik CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 The sections listed below beginning with 932 reflect standards contained in the Seniors Standards while Section 936 is contained in Condominium Standards. Section Issue Required Proposed S.932.5.3 Conceptual Resolution required. Resolution to be Plan prepared for concurrent action with zone change approval. 5.932.5.4 Development Agreement *S.932.5.7 Handicapped Access Requirement S.932.5.10 Site Coverage Establishes basic parameters for development 10% of the units (48,827 max. sq. ft. ) (2 lots combined) Submitted 2% of units 39,966.5 sq. ft. (2 lots combined) Staff Report - 7/1/86 -4- (5524d) Section Issue Required Proposed S.932.5.13 Building Allowed 8 stories 35'6" three story Height portion and 2116" two story portion *S.932.5.14 Building Structure shall not 222 linear ft. Bulk exceed 180 ft. in bldg. on each lot) length S.932.5.15 Parking 20 1 bdrm @ 1.0 = 20 134 76 2 bdrm @ 1.5 =114 Total =134 S.932.5.17 Parking 9' x 19' and 9' x 19' Space 3 ft. additional spaces Dimension width adjacent to structure over 12 inches in height S.932.5.18 Parking Parking assign- Parking assignment Assignment ment plan required plan submitted. 200 ft. S932.5.20 Open Space 2500 sq. ft. 9048 sq. ft. required for provided projects of 50+ limits *S.9362.1 Number of 45.5 (Avg.) bedroom 172 total bedrooms bedrooms permitted per acre = 118 S.9362.3 Setback 20 ft. average from Public required with 15 ft. 24 ft. average Street minimum dimension to living space *S.9362.6 Setback Minimum 85 ft. with 85 ft. setback with from landscape buffer 10' buffer indicated Interior required adjacent to Property low density resi- Line dential when build- ings exceeds 30 ft. in height. 24 ft. setback for 20 ft. residential and buildings under 30 37 ft. recreational ft. building *=Special Permit Required Staff Report - 7/1/86 -5- (5524d) The 96 unit senior condominium proposes to have access from Happy Drive with an additional exit at each end of the project. Guest parking is proposed in the center and rear of the project. The requests for density bonus averages 50% increase for the entire project and written assurance of the age requirement are required to be incorporated into the development agreement. Staff recommends the density bonus be equally shared on each lot which are held under separate ownership. As indicated in the above development standard matrix, staff has identified several deficiencies in the plan as proposed. The project has been re -designed to provide one and two bedroom units. The building length exceeds 180 ft. but offers a variation in building offset at the portion not over parking. Elevations have been submitted to reflect a variation in roof treatment. The second issue of concern involves the setback along the south property line. The ordinance code requires an 85 foot setback (with landscape buffer) for projects exceeding 30 feet in height adjacent to a low density residential development. The site presently zoned (Q)R2-PD requires a 20 ft. landscape buffer along the common property line with the R1 district. According to the applicant, residents in that neighborhood are amenable to a reduced buffer, however, the plan depicts auto overhang into this area. Adjacent property owners have also expressed a desire to participate in the design of the buffer. The re -designed concept of the proposed 96 units (two story and three story construction over partial subterranean parking) depicts an elevator. A central interior corridor has been provided on each floor. Assigned parking spaces must be within 200 ft. walking distance. The parking management needs revision to assign a handicapped parking space to a handicap unit and to equalize the walking distance from each unit to the respective parking space. Staff recommends that covered parking be provided for 17 spaces, so that each unit has a covered, assigned space. This addition will not cause the allowable site coverage to be exceeded. Fire Department regulations require additional turning radius adjacent to parking spaces 40 and 95. Compliance may eliminate required parking and necessitate a revision in the unit or bedroom count to satisfy on -site parking. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No. 86-2, Tentative Tract No. 11955, Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, and based on the following findings and conditions of approval. Staff Report - 7/1/86 -6- (5524d) •Findings for Tentative Tract 11955 1. This proposed 14.7+ acre subdivision divided into 7 lots: 6 for residential purposes and 1 for industrial purposes, will be developed in accordance and in compliance with the established densities and land uses as depicted in the City's current General Plan. 2. This property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for high density residential and industrial were placed on the subject property. Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No. 11955 1. The tentative tract received and dated March 27, 1986, shall be the approved tentative tract. 2. Sewer, water and fire hydrant systems shall be subject to the City's standard plans and specifications as adopted by the City Council. 3. Easements for water facilities shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach and shall be located in the private streets. 4. Water wells shall be abandoned per the City of Huntington Beach's standards. • 5. A storm drain system shall be constructed from Tract 8197 (located at the south border of Lot 2) and connect to the existing storm drain at Talbert Avenue and Kovacs Lane. 6. A 10 foot easement for the storm drain shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach on Lot 2. 7. Sewer easements in private streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 8. Street improvements shall be installed per Public Works standards. 9. All landscaping along Talbert Avenue shall be installed on private property. No trees will be planted in the parkway, but will be incorporated in the adjacent onsite landscape plan. 10. Except where private entrance drives intersect Talbert Avenue, vehicular access rights to said streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11. Street "A" shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates subject property • as Medium Density Residential; t;ierefore, the Senior suffix is consistent with the General Plan Designation. Staff Report - 7/1/86 -7- (5524d) 2. Senior residential development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are • similarly developed. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. The proposed development will promote better living conditions and environments. 2. The proposed development utilizes land -planning techniques which include tasteful types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 3. The proposed development will benefit the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood and the City in general, and will not be a detriment to or degrade property values in such neighborhood and the City. FINDINGS FOR DENSITY BONUS: 1. The capacities of the City and County water, sewer and storm drain systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 2. The proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school • enrollments, and recreational resources. 3. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Through the use of the special permit, the proposed development of a 96 unit senior residential housing complex is in compliance with all of the City's development standards for this type of housing and is consistent with the zoning on the subject property. 2. The proposed senior residential project on 2.60 gross acres is proposed to be developed having a density of 36.9 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the senior residential suffix regulations and Genera: Plan. 3. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and through the use of special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision will be in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinance. • Staff Report - 7/1/86 -8- (5524d) SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated June 24, 1986, shall be the a-orova6 layout. 2. Prior to issuance oii bu�l.ding pormits, the applicant shall submit the following: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. The Landscape Plan shall come back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. The landscape plan shall also be submitted to the adjacent single family development's homeowner's association for review and recommendations of the landscape buffer adjacent to the R1 property. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. c. Development Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Council and recorded in the Orange County Recorder's Office pursuant to the Government Code and those procedures adopted by the City Council for such agreements (Resolution No. 53°C`,. • The development agreement shall include a program to insure that adequate provision has been made to insure that each unit shall be occupied by at least one person sixty years of age or older. d. Rodent eradication plan;; approved by the Orange County Vector Control District. e. Grading and Drainage Plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (grade not to exceed one-half percent). C, f. Revised parking management plan to reflect assigned space within the secured areas and no more than 200 ft. at the respective unit, and 'handicap parking for the handicap unit. g. Plans for Recreation Buildings to the Department of Development Services for review and approval. h. A copy of the recorded final map to the Department of Development Services and Public Works. 3. The development agreement shall be prepared incorporating the allowable density, conditions of approval, and 50% density bonus to be for low and moderate income and distributed equally between the two buildings. Staff Report - 7/1/86 •-9- (5524d) 4. The development cc)Tp.jr with all applicable provisions of . the Ordinance Coda, Division, a.rd Fire Department 5. Conditional Use Permit :c , 86-2 shall become effective on the effective date of i�L�'i e�r,e��'ci.:�.g crdinarce for Zone Change No. 86-2. 6. Driveway app:= oaches be a minimum of ti-yenty-seven feet (27 ° ) in width and shal -- be o � r.adius type construction. 7. An auLomatic s'o- iriAle:- ssyszem apptovcd by the Fire Department shall be iryca,? l e-i the comalee. o This includes parking structure a:na bus _d.ne's:, 8. A wet combination_ sta.r_c: system approved by the Fire Department. shall be in w*-1 stasrE'ayso Qo An automatic a.lazm by the Fire Department shall be installed thrcL:ghT':ie system shall include the following features a o Water floe anc. va:iv-- irJ.^: detection bo Trouble signal c o Voice communicat`.o . d o Graphic annunc:.a:.c_� e o manual Dulls • 10. Elevators shall ' hal1. be 8'--' ls►ide by 41 31 deep to accommodate the use of an ambu-.zace qu;-- •gay o Elevators shall be provided on all floors a_nclual.a su.oCe7- anean parking level. 11. Any proposed trasi cht:ts lccations and systems shall be approved by the Fire Depa.:: t,t e n 12. Fire lanes are to be .,csc.d and signed to comply with Fire Department stance.:-eso 13. All roads are to be i._:st_Z. 1. 1ed prior to the commencement of the combust-ible cons-rucc:.o:::. v, —':'_h all weather driving surfaces constructed to t .s and speci J. cations of the public Works Department 14. Water supply she -,I be ca-,DEble of providing �k, 000 gallons per minute for fire _too , 15. Fire extinguishers sha:_i. be provided w-Ithin 75 feet of travel lanes. Type of ext:.nc�u.s1.e.. 6.1id locations must be in accordance with Huntington Beach F'i,'e Code standards. 16. Any security gates and :enci.ng proposed for installation shall be subject to review and apprcval by the Fire Department. • Staff Report - 7/1/86 -�.�- ;5524d) • 17. The subject proper tiers s ha.. _ enter into an irrevocable drivew y and parki ahg ea,same:.1.c o:�_ the legal instrument shall be approved by o:::::Zy as "to i1orm and content and, when approver,, sha.__I b;: c:_..: c s:� the office of the County Recorder and a copy .... 1.cc' +'It"i .' ��:;_ ;rac �t o:' Develcpment eZvices. 18. The MR s a.nc: Oz hal'. set "forth provisions to prohibit the stc::c;;e 3:: ._sc:eat:.one.l vehicles on designated open parking spaces cject. 19. Prior to the recc c:ac.c,. o a. "final map, the CC&R°s for the project shall. be, ;:c the Department of Development SerV4 Ces for ?'ev-.-t, ?q Z �.s_.: e compliance with all applicable conditions of 'GC "che Attorney`s Office for review as to legal form. 20. A minimum seta<a"tic-'. 'Is'-,:9se�. structures and the project boundaries shall be :~.0 ..sss clhan 20 feet adjacent to existing residential a:: eas _ "` s.: z t'he sepa.rati on is less than 20 feet, structures sid _nc shall receive special treatment by the elimina"t _c:,. c� ccc:_y and �,-rin6ows on the second and third floor units„ so �.p c'__.:_ ;:satme ht shall be given to the roofline and '-Phe se'-bac!t areas. 21. Intensified landsca. .:; be p.ovi ded in all areas to within 20 feet of the adjacent to the existing single family dwell -.e-s . :c_^._. . '.t.:.— sca pe p l.an shall be reviewed and • approved prior cC c- building permits. 22. Energy efficient such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used ;-:.a_:::�__-.g lots and recreational areas and shall be designed tc sp -2�.l l age onto adjacent areas, 23. Natural gas shal_. ,�^ �;i: .'�:�ec� .n art the locations of cooking facilities; wa.te:- th ate::L_ and central heating units. 24. Low -volume heads spa- '-c us::d on al_- spigots and crater faucets. 25. All building spo _ _s su.,:bas unusable :.umber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or u:-.Lsa'.;__e a.teria.? sl.all be disposed of at an off -site faci 1.:_ty sc--.: .-psc: to har d'_s "them. 26. The structures on spa ;ect property, whether attached or detached, sha:.___ be cc�,s :: c�ec? :_n cor11p.1).ance with the State acoustical stanca.-:ds so'- c;_th for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours o:= t-1-0 ;3::c y Evidence of compliance shall consist of submi tta:. c.-- an. a.coust :cal analysis report, prepared under the supervis .cn c= E. -;_-::son elsperienced in the field of acoustical_h., f:-.t:h the appl :cation for building permit(s). 27. If lighting is i nc'.u:1.ec `. the carki ng lot, high-pressure sodium is vapor lamps shall tie L.s`r•. Zor ene gy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent °spillage° onto adjacent properties. Staff Report - 7/1/86 -.1-1 - (5524d ) 0 28. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soil r_ Enginee. This ana!_Ys'.s sna11 include on -site soil sampling and laboratory tesc:'_ i; c.: to provide detailed recommendations s c_- c ,-a.d9 ng o chemical and gill properties, foundations, �V�l.�. _i 1�:. 6;. �•j !'?C..'. :. .�'Sp _';teets, Gnd utilities. 29. If foil -typo y nsiz_.a. io _s 'Co be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as apD).oved by the Building Divisiono ATTACHMENTS 1. Site plan, floor plans a.^d elevations dated 6-24-86 2. Development Agreement. c. 3. Staff Report dated 1s.-!--85 4, Staff Report dated 3-.S.-83 5. Staff Report da'Ced JWP:SPopb 09- Staff Report - V1/86 -.12- (5524d) HURTINGTOf: S :.C;l HUNTINGTON BEACH NUNTINGT OEVELOPM.Ei@T SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT SEPV , Cc •=c v. )o:: 20 P.O. Box 190 P, 0. B 190 Huitir�S?.oicn ;t.ccd, C% iC A G R t ifPr i n Beach, CA g BOX Beach, CA g?81$ THIS AGRELMLNI, made and entered into on the day of 1986, is by and between the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH, a public body, corporate and politic (the "City" herein), and, COLLINS-ZWEIBEL (the "Participant" herein). WHEREAS, the preparation by Participant, approval by the City, and subsequent recordation of a Development Agreement has been imposed by the City as a condition of approval of Participant's Zone Case 86-2 for the development and u.v of the project area; and, WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting forth the total number of units and continued affordability of such units for said project; and, WHEREAS, the fulfillment of this Agreement and the development of the site Pursuant to this Agreement are in the best interests of • the City and the health, safety and welfare of its residents, and in accordance with public purposes and provisions of applicable Federal, State and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties, as follows: 1. PROJECT AREA/SITE: The project area consists of approximately 2.60 gross acres, generally located South of Happy Drive, West of Beach Boulevard, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and more particularly described as follows: noo w/4—hed 2. NIIMDER AND TYPE OF UNITS: Participant has been granted a Conditional use I'er•mit to build a maximum of 96 S,-nior Citizens "For Sale" units, page 1 or 3 0 subjec'_ to the coodi:.ions imposed by the City in Conditional Use Permit • No. 66-2, which -pis approved by the Planning Commission of the City on or about 3. AFFORDABLE UNITS: Participant shall be required, and hereby agrees to provide and sell twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of units, being 24 units, as "affordable" units in said project. Said "affordable" units shall be provided as follows: (A) Fifty percent (50'E) to households of "moderate" income: anc, (B) Fifty percent (50%) to households of "low" income. "Low" income households as used herein shall be defined to mean those households earning up to eighty percent (80%) of the Orange County median family income, as determined by the Center for Economic Research at Chapman College in Orange, California. "Moderate" income households as used herein, shall be defined to mean those households earning up to one hundered twenty percent (120!) of the Orange County median family income, as dete-ni.ied by the Center for Economic Research at Chapman College in Orange, California. • The remaining savenny-five percent (752) of the total number of units, being seventy-two (72) Senior Citizen•, "for sale" units, may be provided and sold at market rates by Participant. 4. DURATION OF AFFORDAR UNIjj : The said "affordable" units shall continue to be so provided and sold for fifteen (15) years. 5. SENIOR CITIZEN Rr JiRIKfJj : Each unit shall be occupied by at least one (1) person Oho is sixty (60) years, of age, or older. No person or persons under the age of forty-five (45) shall be permitted as full-time residents of the proje,:t. 6. NCTICF.S: Ant• notice required hereunder shall be in writing and sent pre -paid via Certified or Registered Mail, addressed in the case of the City to: page 7 of 3 • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: and in the case of Participants) to: Lvelyne Zweibel Shabo 5800 Spring Oak Terrace Los Angeles, CA 90068 LeRoy & Yolanda Collins 8649 E. 7th Street Downey, CA 90241 or as may otherwise he changed in this manner. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have placed their signatures below, on the date first written, at Huntington Beach, California City: 0 ATTEST: City Clerk Participant: 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ty Attorney Director of' Development Services BY page 3 of 3 'A„7',L J DE SC K L rr l OI% DHSCg1PTl0H • Lots 113. 114, 119, 120, 125, 12b, 131, 132. 137. 13b, 143, 144. 149 and 15u in block A, Lots 109 to 15U inclusive, it, block b, Lots log to 112 inclusive, 115 to 118 incrusLvu, L21 to 124 Snclublvu, 127 to 130 inclusive, 133 to 136 inclusive, 1311 to 142 inclusive, 14b, 147 and 148, in Block C and the South 10 feat of Late 149 .and 15U in Block C, of Tract No. 172, In the City of Huntington beach, County of Orange. State of California, as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book 12, pages 21 and 22 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County. L'XEPT1NG from Lots 112. 118. 124, 130. 13b and 142 in said block C. the East 18 feet thereof. ALSO 414CdnLUG from Lot 148 in said Block C, the East 18 feet of the North 15 tut thereof. YURTHEK XXCVPrLNG therefrom all of the oil, gas, mineral rights and other hydrocarbon substances, taken from or under the above described land and also except the solo and rxClualva right to lease the said land above described for the development, drilling for, extracting, taking and removing from acid land or all, gas and other hydrocarbon nubULallcte mud the #ola and exclusive right to drill for, take and rove oil, gas and other hydrocarbon aubstancas from said land, and reaerving nacasaary rights and rights of way for operating upon said land,%for the said purposes, an reserved by George W. Mc Intyra, Claude K. Mc lntyre, Harris Howatd Hale and Herod Margaret Hale, in Book 4U8, Page 3Y of Dead& and various other deeds of record coo numerous to mention. 0 � sraff • • TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: W huntington beach development services department EpOR Planning Commission Development Services June 17, 1986 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2 IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 11955 Lee and Yolanda Collins To permit 96 senior condominium units and reinstatement of Tentative Tract 11955 South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard Attached is a request for a two week continuance to allow additional time to prepare the development agreement required for the zone change and completion of plans. At the May 6, 1986 Planning Commission meeting the applicant verbally waived the mandatory processing date. RECOMMENDATION: Continue Zone Change No. 86-2/Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2/Negative Declaration No. 86-2, and Tentative Tract No. 11955 to the July 1, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. ATTACHMENT: Letter of Continuance J pb E54�4 i i m IR; C./ A -F M-23A a- W • June 11, 1986 Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, CA. RE: REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF #86-2 We are working diligently to complete the plans and other requirements for our project. However, for everything to be fully prepared to properly present it to the Commission, we respectfully ask for a little more time. ) Please grant a continuance for a period of about vda weeks, fb your sammmi meeting ttn July �� 1986`; We are specifically needing to complete the Development Agreement and also to complete the plans to the full satis- faction of the Planning Department. Very respectfully for your approval, z Mf IF on ehalf of the parties. v LLINS HUNTING T ON BEACH DEVELOPMENT Sr�VICES Puri, uses 0 F. 0 Flux 19.) Ilil�inu' i�h, CA �j"!64l4 0 SrAfF • *1 • '--' huntftton beach development services department EpOR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: May 6, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE.CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2 APPLICANT/ Lee & Yolanda Collins DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: Serge Zweibel March 17, 1986 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, CA 90241 MANDATORY PPOCESSING DATE: Player ; 1986 AGENT: John Cowles 6480 Westminster Ave. Westminster, CA 92683 R_E_C_U_E_fi_T: Zone Change (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR; CUP - 96 senior condominium units, LOCATION: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Poulevard 7N CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT 11955 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment RFQUEST: Reinstatement of Tentative Tract 11955, 7 lot subdivision LOCATION: South of Talbert, west of Beach Flvd . AC PEACE: 14 .7+ m u ZONE: R4-SR and (Q)R2-Pr GENERAL PLANS Medium and Hi-qF Dens ty Residential EXISTING USE: Vacant ACREAGE: 2.60 gross acres DATE ACCEPTED: March 17, 1986 MANDATORY PPOCESSING DATE May 6, 1986 ZONE:R4-SR, (C)R2-PD, M1-A GENERAL, PLAN: Medium and High Density Residential and Industrial EXISTING USE: Vacant and senior housing. A -FMd3A 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: 0 Approve Tentative Tract 11955 based on findings and conditions of approval outlined in this report and continue Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, and Negative Declaration No. 86-2 at the applicant's request. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior). Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 48 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and 48 senior residential condominiums on that property being rezoned to R2-SR. The property owners desire that development of each lot be identical. The conditional use permit analysis is based on the total project of 96 units. Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. All lots of this map have not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised tentative map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. The conditional use permit project is proposed on lots 2 and 3 of the revised tentative map. 3.0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium and High Density Residential ZONE: (Q) R2-PD and R4-SR LAND USE: Vacant North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: (Q) R2-PD and R4-SR LAND USE: Condominiums East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONE: C4 LAND USE: Commercial South of Subject Provert GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential and General Commercial ZONE: R1 and C4 LAND USE: Single family attached residential and commercial 0. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -2- (5018d) 0- • • • West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Hiqh Density Residential R4-SR Senior Apartments Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-2. 5.0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Redevelopment concurs with staff's recommendation for continuance as requested by the applicant. 7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Pursuant to Subdivision Committee request, a revised tract map has been prepared depicting the necessary changes to the remaining 7 unrecorded lots. 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: A revised conceptual site was submitted for staff review on April 28, 1986. Analysis of the site plan has been provided below under the subheading of Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2. A draft development agreement and parking management plan have not been received as required by the Senior Suffix requlations. A request for continuance has been submitted and is attached.. The purpose of the SR suffix is to establish standards for residential developments designed to house senior citizens. The senior residential development standards provide flexibility of design with consideration given to the proximity of the site to public transportation, shopping and like services. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -3- (5018d) I -A Lot 2 zoned R4 Lot Size: 1.24 gross acres Density: 35 units x 1.24 = 43.4 units allowed; 48 units proposed Proposed Density Increase: 5 units (12%) or average 38 units per gross acre Average Density Increase for Entire Project: 50% Lot 3 zoned (Q) R2-PD 1.36 gross acres 15 units x 1.36 = 20.4 units allowed; 48 units proposed 28 units (132%) or average 35 units per gross acre 36.92 units per gross acre (lots combined) • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 The sections listed below beginning with 932 reflect reflect standards contained in the Seniors Standards while Section 936 is contained in Condominium Standards. Section Issue S.932.5.3 Conceptual Plan S.932.5.4 Development Agreement *S.932.5.7 Handicapped Access Requirement S.932.5.10 Site Coverage *5.932.5.14 Building Bulk Required Resolution required. Establishes basic parameters for development 10% of the units 50% of gross acreage Proposed Resolution to be prepared for concurrent action with zone change approval. Not submitted 2% of units minus street; (net 40,824 sq. ft. site area) 48,827 (2 lots combined) sq. ft. (2 lots combined) Structure shall not exceed 180 ft. in length 232 linear ft. bldg. on each lot) Staff Report - 5J6J86 -4- (5018d) • • • S.932.5.15 Parking S.932.5.17 Parking Space Dimension S.932.5.18 Parking Assiqnment *S.9362.1. S.9362.3 Section *S.9362.6 Number of bedrooms Setback from Public Street • lkwo 20 1 bdrm @ 1.0 = 20 76 2 bdrm @ 1.5 =114 Total =T.34 3 ft. additional width adjacent to structure over 12 inches in height Parking assign- ment plan required 58.7 (Avg.) bedroom permitted per acre = 131 20 ft. average required with 15 ft. minimum dimension Issue Required Setback Minimum 85 ft. with from landscape buffer Interior required adjacent to Property low density resi- Line dential when build- ings exceeds 30 ft. in height. *S.9362.15 Private Accessways *=Special Permit Required 28 ft. setback for buildings under 30 ft. 31 ft. radius curbed turn -around for accessways exceeding 150 ft. Insufficient plans to confirm 134 on site standard 9' x 19' spaces No parking assign- ment plan submitted. 172 total bedrooms (no floor plans submitted) 24 ft. average to living space Proposed 85 ft. setback with no buffer indicated 20 ft. residential and 10 ft. recreational building none The 96 unit senior condominium proposes to have access from Happy Drive with an additional exit at each end of the project. Guest parking is proposed in the center and rear of the project and off -site. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -5- (5018d) The requests for density bonus averages 50% increase for the entire project and written assurance of the age requirement are required to be• incorporated into the development agreement. As indicated in the above development standard matrix, staff has identified several deficiencies in the plan as proposed. The project has been re -designed to provide one and two bedroom units. The building length exceeds 180 ft. and offers only slight variation in building offset. No elevations have been submitteud to reflect a variation in roof treatment. The second issue of concern involves the setback along the south property line. The ordinance code requires an 85 foot setback (with landscape buffer) for projects exceeding 30 feet in height adjacent to a low density residential development. A redesign reducing the number of two bedroom units has not resolved the setback deficiencies. Parking perpendicular to the R1 property line does not allow a sufficient area for a buffer and will create a possible noise and fumes impact on the adjacent properties. Staff recommends a 20 ft. buffer consistent with the adjacent development. The re -designed concept of the proposed 96 units (two story and three story construction over partial subterranean parking) depicts an elevator. A central. interior corridor has been provided on each floor. Staff, however, is unable to verify that an assigned parking space is within 200 ft. walking distance and if an elevator is provided on each level. Staff's recommendation for continuance is based on achieving the • following results: 1. Allows the applicant time to prepare a draft Development Agreement. 2. Provide additional time for the applicant to work with staff in finalizing the site plan and redesigning the floor plan and exterior elevations. 3. Prepare a Parking Management Plan. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract No. 11955 based on the following findings and conditions of approval and continue Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, and Negative Declaration No. 86-2 to allow the applicant time to meet with staff and work toward a final design of the layout. It will also provide the applicant with the additional time to prepare a Draft Developer Agreement and Parking Manaqement Plan. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -6- (5018d) Findings for Tentative Tract 11955 • 1. This proposed 14.7+ acre subdivision divided into 7 lots: 6 for residential purposes and 1 for industrial purposes, will be developed in accordance and in compliance with the established densities and land uses as depicted in the City's current General Plan. 2. This property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time the land use designation for high density residential and industrial were placed on the subject property. Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract No. 11955 1. The tentative tract received and dated March 27, 1986, shall be the approved tentative tract. 2. Sewer, water and fire hydrant systems shall be subject to the City's standard plans and specifications as adopted by the City Council. 3. Easements for water facilities shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach and shall be located in the private streets. 4. Water wells shall be abandoned per the City of Huntington Beach's standards. 5. A storm drain system shall be constructed from Tract 8197 (located at the south border of Lot 2) and connect to the existing storm drain at Talbert Avenue and Kovacs Lane. 6. A 10 foot easement for the storm drain shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach on Lot 2. 7. Sewer easements in private streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 8. Street improvements shall be installed per Public tAl orks standards. 9. All landscapinq along Talbert Avenue shall be installed on private property. No trees will be planted in the parkway, but will be incorporated in the adjacent onsite landscape plan. 10. Except where private entrance drives intersect Talbert Avenue, vehicular access rights to said streets shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11. Street "A" shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 and • Negative Declaration No. 86-2 based on the following findings and Staff Report - 5/6/86 -7- (5018d) *Ask* 1• �• conditions of approval. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. Land Use Element of the General Plan designates subject property as Medium Density Residential; therefore, the Senior suffix is consistent with the General Plan Designation. 2. Senior residential development of the subject site will be compatible with surrounding land uses because these properties are similarly developed. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. The proposed development will promote better living conditions and environments. 2. The proposed development utilizes land -planning techniques which include tasteful types of architecture, landscaping, site layout and design. 3. The proposed development will benefit the general health, welfare, safety, and convenience of the neighborhood and the City in general, and will not be a detriment to or degrade property values in such neighborhood and the City. FINDINGS FOR DENSITY BONUS: 0 1. The capacities of. the City and County water, sewer and storm drain%Z•_ systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 2. The proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. 3. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/: 1. Through the use .of the special permit, the proposed development of a 96 unit senior residential housing complex is in compliance with all of the City's development standards for this type of housinq and is consistent with the zoning on the subject property. 2. The proposed senior residential project on 2.60 gross acres is proposed to he developed having a density of 36.9 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the senior residential suffix regulations and General Plan. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -8- (5018d) • 3. The lot size, depth, frontage, street widths, and through the use of special permit, all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision will be in compliance with*the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Map Act and supplementary City subdivision ordinance. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2: 1. Site plan, floor plans, and elevations shall'be submitted for review and approval depicting the modifications described herein: a. provide a minimum 20 ft. wide landscape buffer along the entire south property line. b. relocation of trash area. C. relocate outdoor storage areas to subterranean parking structure. d. turnaround area(s) in compliance with Fire Department regulations. e. maximum building length of 180 ft. 2. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following: a. Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval. The Landscape Plan shall come back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. b. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment. C. Development Aqreement shall be prepared pursuant to the Government Code and those procedures adopted by the City Council for such agreements (Resolution No. 5390). The development agreement shall include a program to insure that adequate provision has been made to insure that each unit shall be occupied by at least one person sixty years of age or older. d. Rodent eradication plan, approved by the Orange County Vector Control District. e. Gradinq and Drainage Plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval (grade not to exceed one-half percent). Staff Report - 5/6/86 -9- (5018d) i 3. The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of t� Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department. 4. Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 shall become effective on the effective date of implementing ordinance for Zone Change No. 86-2. 5. Driveway approaches shall be a minimum of twenty-seven feet (271) in width and shall be of radius type construction. 6. An automatic sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout the complex. This includes parking structure and buildings. 7. A wet combination stand pipe system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed in all stairways. 8. An automatic alarm system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout. The system shall include the following features: a. hater flow and valve tamper detection b. Trouble signal C. voice communication d. Graphic annunciation e. Manual pulls 9. Elevators shall be sized 6' 8" wide by 4' 3" deep to accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney. Elevators shall be provided on all floors including subterranean parking level. 10. Any proposed trash chute locations and systems shall be approved by the Fire -Department. 11. Fire lanes are to be posted and signed to comply with Fire Department standards. 12. All roads are to be installed prior to the commencement of the combustible construction with all weather driving surfaces constructed to the standards and specifications of the Public Works Department. 13. Water supply shall be capable of providing 4,000 gallons per minute for fire flow. 14. Fire extinguishers shall be provided within 75 feet of travel lanes. Type of extinguishers and locations must be in accordance with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -10- (5018d) 15. Any security gates and fencing proposed for installation shall be • subject to review and approval by the Fire Department. 16. The subject properties shall enter into an irrevocable driveway and parking easement. A copy of the legal instrument shall be approved by the City Attorney as to form and content and, when approved, shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and a copy filed with the Department of Development Services. C, 17. The CC&R's and association rules shall set forth provisions to prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles on designated open parking spaces within the project. 18. Prior to the recordation of a final map, the CC&R's for the project shall be submitted to the Department of Development services for review, to assure compliance with all applicable conditions of approval and to the Attorney's Office for review as to leqal form. 19. A minimum separation between structures and the project boundaries shall be no less than 15 feet adjacent to existing residential areas. Where the separation is less than 20 feet, structures siding on the setback shall receive special treatment by the elimination of doors and windows on the second and third floor units. Also special treatment shall be given to the roofline and landscapinq in the setback areas. 20. Intensified landscaping shall be provided in all areas to within 20 feet of the property line adjacent to the existing single family dwellings. This landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 21. A development agreement shall be prepared incorporating the allowable density and conditions of approval. 22. Energy efficient lighting, such as high pressure sodium vapor lamps, shall be used in parking lots and recreational areas and shall be designed to prevent spillage onto adjacent areas. 23. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. 24. I,ow-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 25. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off -site facility equipped to handle them. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -11- (5018d) `1- 0 26. The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of compliance shall - consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s). 27. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lightinq shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 28. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer. This analysis shall include on -site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, steets, and utilities. 29. If foil -type insulation is to he used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter requesting continuance 2. Staff report dated April 1, 1986 3. Tentative Tract No. 11955 4. Conceptual site plan JKIPp 0 0. Staff Report - 5/6/86 -12- (5018d) AGAPE ?YESIGN 6480 WestministerAve i CANNING �+�' DEVELOPMENT Westminister,ca.9z683 - (714) 998-9693 April 28, 1986 Planning Department Department of Development Se 4iLet" City of Huntington Beach Ref: Zone Change 86-2 Conditional Use Permit 86-2 Attn: Susan Pierce/Associate Planner Dear Susan, We would like to request a continuance of our project (reference above) currently scheduled for the May 6, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting. This would therefore allow us some time to meet with staff and work toward a favorable recommendation from staff to the Planning Commission. Also, this would allow for us to prepare the necessary documents (site plan, floor plans, & elevations) for the re - submittal to the Commission. Bob Zweibel • v Respectfully Yours, Lee C611ins/Owner Y landa ollins/Owner J� c tsMatUMs qflmcg REVISED) t k ritis�--ivF �� ��_ — Tom=--- i } I i:=:_'^�,—�_ _ ••-` ,-- ��•�— — _ -- i i umajamum • fir-- _/ /i �I � � .� ��n � 1� - s % I •an wrrm. rp Cr. sr a.. rav n. ,rr r orr ■■misr�rai f ra�rNIRAn sums. stssa rn . srfr r srp w r rsr t r� ---•� /_ - , •ssr w assrrtaa �q,�,gpy �Syggya o r r st wr n radON. . u itr`d3w qC_ r s r o ra^. a+rrit► a �Rraa �rwr�nurrtnrr fiACT- 1206A^- _ namro ma. e•s. mm+e r ws+ sstssrr �- wusr rs. nwr�sm r.,ur rssKms a. W&w'+in.jj .. ao � rarer n csn. ra. GIST. IUL 0 um • - a ,n rn arrs. oar .- �Crrst. emu. srr L7 WAN Zrrr rb •�/r1. �I[ �/O•:fa O. �y� •• f rIYCOn OR �•7k ' . �:. rw K K utt bnm w.r .• �r sto.n aw. C'"r rMrar AMAWf J"*T I _ �. sCC a• r1 srsr. t••r� cow I*. r I '• /7 ^ a: i ri JN J170 I 5r-�l � sraff huntington beach development services department EpOR TO: t'llanniny commission FROM: Development Services DATE;: April 1, 1986 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2/TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-2 APPLICANT/ Lee & Yolanda Collins DATE ACCEPTED: OWNER: Serge Zweibel March 17, 1986 8649 E. Seventh Street Downey, CA 90241 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: May 16, 1996 AGENT: John Cowles 6480 Westminster Ave. Westminster, CA 92683 REQUEST: Zone Change (Q)R2-PD to R2-SR; CUP - 96 senior condominium units; and reinstatement of Tentative Tract 11955 LOCATION: South of Happy Drive, west of Beach Boulevard 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: ZONE: R4-SR and (Q)R2-PD GENERAL PLAN: Medium and High Density Residential EXISTING USE: Vacant ACREAGE: 2.60 gross acres Continue Zone Change No. 86-21 Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, Tentative Tract No. 11955 and Negative Declaration No. 86-2 in order to allow the applicant time to work with staff to redesign the site layout. 2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No. 86-2 is a request to change the zone from (Q)R2-PD, Qualified Medium Density Residential -Planned Development, to R2-SR on a portion of the development (Medium Density Residential - Senior). Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 is a request to build 96 senior residential condominiums on property zoned R4-SR and that portion being rezoned to (Q)R2-SR. Tentative Tract No. 11955 was a 10 lot subdivision that was approved by the Planning Commission on June 7, 1983. This map has not completed recordation requirements; only 3 lots have been recorded, therefore it has expired. A revised map consisting of 7 lots has been filed to reinstate the subdivision. m C'-.5 A-FMiJ1. 3..0-:;.UkR0UNDIN(; LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAI. PIrN DESIGNATIONS: Su er.t PEoEertY: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: tiuh ot Pro t!rt : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE: LAND USE: 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Medium and High Density Residential (Q)R2-PD and R4-SR Vacant Medium Density Residential (Q)R2-PD and R4-SR Condominiums General Commercial C4 Commercial Low Density Residential and General Commercial R1 and C4 Single family attached residential and commercial High Density Residential R4-SR Senior Apartments Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department. of Development Services posted draft Negative Declaration No. 86-2 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal or written were received. The staff, in its initial study of the project, has recommended that a negative declaration be issued Prior to any action on Zone Change No. 86-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 86-2. 5. 0 COASTAI. STATUS: Not applicable. 0- 6.0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: See attached memo. • Staff Report - 4/l/86 -2- (4482d) 7.O SPECIFIC PLAN:" ►1,11 !'Mi DIVISION COMMITTE:E:: ;:tafi has determined that Subdivision Committee did not need to meet on the snap as there were no changes proposed in layout or design, 9.0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The purpose of the SR suffix is to establish standards for residential developments designed to house senior citizens. The senior residential development standards provide flexibility of design with consideration given to the proximity of the site to public transportation, shopping and like services. Lot Size: R4 = 1.24 gross acres R2 - 1.36 gross acres Density: R4 35 units x 1.24 = R2 15 units x 1.36 = 43.4 units allowed; 20.4 units allowed; 48 units proposed 48 units proposed Proposed Density Increase: 5 units (12%) or average 28 units (132%) or average 38 units per gross acre 35 units per gross acre Average Density Increase for Entire Project: 50% 36.92 units per gross acre (lots combined) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Section Issue S.932.5.3 Conceptual Plan 5.932.5.4 Development Agreement *,�.932.5.7 Handicapped Access Requirement Required Resolution required. Establishes basic parameters for development 10% of the units *= Special Permits Required • Staff Report - 4/1/86 -3- Proposed Resolution to be prepared for concurrent action with zone change approval. Not submitted 28 of units (4482d) 1%.► 0. Swk't i on Is.ciU e *5.932.5.10 Site Coverage *S.932.5.15 Parking 5.932.5.16 Parking Facilities 5.932.5.18 Parking Assignment *S.9362.1 Number of bedrooms .Required -eroposed 50% of gross acreage minus street; 48,827 sq.ft. 51,834 sq.ft. 144 on site 112 on site One required 58.7 (Avg.) bedroom permitted per acre 22 off site spaces reduction of 10. Total ratio 1:1.37. No total parking assignment submitted. 192 total bedrooms 5.9362.3 Setback 20 ft. average 12.5 ft. to balcony and from Public required with 15 ft. storage area and 20 ft. Street minimum dimension average to building wall. *S.9362.6 Setback Minimum 85 ft. with from landscape buffer Interior required adjacent to Property low density resi- Line dential when build- ings exceeds 30 ft. in height. *=Special Permit Required 15 ft. residential and 10 ft. recreational building for buildings or building portions under 30 f t . Please note that sections beginning with 932 reflect standards contained in the Seniors Standards while Section 936 is contained in Condominium Standards. • 111te 96 unit senior condominium proposes to have access from Happy Drive with an additional exit at each end of the project. Guest parking is proposed in the center of the project and off -site. Traffic engineering and staff are opposed to any off -site parking being credited toward the parking requirement. The requests for density bonus averages 50% increase for the entire project and written assurance of the age requirement are required to be incorporated into the development agreement. As indicated in the above development standard matrix, staff has identified several deficiencies in the plan as proposed. Primarily, the project is designed exclusively with two bedroom units. This fact directly relates to a number of other deficiencies identified by staff. Specifically, the shortage of on -site parking (32 spaces) is of Staff Report - 4/l/86 -4- (4482d) *Moe Noww" SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Room B-7 - Civi Ce ter 2000 Main t ee Hunt -in ton B , alifornia WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 1983 - 8:00 AM ' COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Higgins, S uma he CITY STAFF PRESENT: Glen Godfrey Savoy Bellavia, Jim B rnes, Mike Adams, B'11 Patapoff, Larry M rshburn TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955)CO DITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 Applicant: City of Huntin on Beach To permit a 10-lot subdiv sion, six lots of which a e to be v- eloped as senior citize ousing under the Condit' nal use rmit, three lots of which ar t be developed later a residenti 1, and Lot 10 of the subdi ion o be retained for f ture deve pment with an industrial u e or u es. Subject pro rty is 1 ated west of Beach Boulev rd o t e s uth side of Tal ert Avenu . Rick Doolittle, epre eating the enginee ing firm Foreman, was pre nt a the meeting. / Savoy Bellavi through 5 and 83-9; Lots 6, , this kydivided, 'and legal jecter to produes: I Holland & fined the tract u er consi ration. Lots 1 are to be deve aped unde Conditional Use Permi' 8 are not b ng propo d for development at 0 is includ d in the act so that it will be a lable lot f r future 'ndustrial use. The pro- eparate o erships d will be developed with twc �1, 2, a d 3 will ontain for -sale condominium units a d is 4, '5, and 9 will be r ntal apartments. The City ownE Lots 2, and 10 and ill acqu' e Lot 4; Lots 5 and 9 are pri- Bill P tf present d the fol owing comments from Public Works: ter: The exist -in 8-inch w ter main in Talbert is undersized and a 12-i h main w 11 have to be constructed; this will i de some offs' e Chang from the 21-inch line at the westerly si Lot 10. The t r lines n Talbe t Avenue will have to be carried through the v ontage of the pr ect 1500 linear feet to provide adequate domestic and f're flo pressure. The map shows an 8-inch water line stubbed in at both the access road from Ta or and A Street. The Water Division has stated that this line m have to be a 10-inch line, but in any case the line will have to be looped prior to the project being built, from A Street through the access road. All the water systems will be dedicated with easements, since they are in private streets. ^1. major concern. The%e submitted proposes to \reke access from Happy Drive with an additional exit at each end of the project. Guest parking is located in the center of the development as well as off site. The applicant has indicated to staff that 22 parking spaces o ..ite will be utilized to mitigate the shortage of on site parking. The necond issue of concern involves the setback along the south vroporty line. The ordinance code requires an 85 foot setback (with lanfiscape buffer) for projects exceeding 30 feet in height adjacent to a low density residential development. Staff suggests that a redesign to reduce the number of two bedroom units will have a positive impact on the parking and setback deficiencies. An additional issue is the design concept of the proposed 96 units (two story construction over partial subterranean parking) which will require that all owners climb at least one flight of stairs. Those owners having units in the second story climb two flights of stairs with all outside access to the units proposed with no elevators. Staff feels that this design is not conducive to a senior project where you have the elderly all climbing stairs to gain access to their units. Staff's recommendation for continuance is based on achieving the following results: 1. Allows the applicant time to prepare a draft Development Agreement. 2. Provide additional time for the applicant to work with staff in redesigning the project's density and/or bedroom count. 3. Prepare a Parking Management Plan. 10.0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Zone Change No. 86-2, Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2, Tentative Tract.11955 and Negative Declaration No. 86-2 to allow the applicant time to meet with staff and work toward a redesign of the layout. It will also provide the applicant with the additional time to prepare a Draft Developer Agreement and Parking Management Plan. 11.0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: If the applicant does not concur with staff's recommendation for continuance the Planning Commission may deny the project based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2: 1. The proposed senior citizen condominium increases the density and will not be compatible to the intensity of existing residential developments in the vicinity. Staff Report - 4/1/86 -5- (4482d) 2. The proposed senior citizen condominium will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach since the project does not comply with the regulations of the Huntington Beach Ordinance because of inadequate parking, insufficient units for handicapped persons, increased site coverage, number of bedrooms per gross acre. 3. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed 96 unit condominium project will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons living in the vicinity and to the property and improvements because adequate parking is not proposed for the intensity of the use proposed. ATTACHMENTS• 1. Area map 2. Site plan, floor plan and elevations 3. Narrative/request for special permit dated March 17, 1986 4. Subdivision Meeting Minutes of 1983 5. Negative Declaration 6. Memo from Redevelopment JWP:SP:kla • d..r Staff Report - 4/1/86 -6- (4482d) CF-R �✓ MI '` R3 R3 R2 C4 j i MI -CD R2 -� s � I ' Y I R2 MI MI J r.. -- I • MI — CD R2 RZ C4 ' MI -CD MI MI as ' •�,.� TALBERT as RS MI -CD MI -A (QIR2-PD k" -SR ' .wo • � I R4-SR C ILL CF-R MI -CD MI -A `- R4-sR Rl�!`� Z�S� MI -CD RI ; _ CF—R „R 2 t RI C RI pra '• RA-0-CD M I IM C 2 � RI RI • CF—C a RI Rf r MI ! RI RI • J R 3 MI -CD RI RI RI RI ! v 1 M I ice.... ZC86-q-6 CUP06--ft-6 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION "TwGTON BEACH 6 i AGAPE 19ESIGN kv 6480 WestministerAve PLANNING DEVELOPMENT Westrninist9268: (71»4) 4) 89a-969; dlarWi:1?,: 19$6 Susan Pierce/ Assoc. Planner Planning Department :-- -•• - City of Huntington Beach - Refs Zone Change No. 86-2 --- - Conditional Use Permit No. 86-2 Dear Susan, As requested per your letter of February 14, 1986, this letter is to serve as the narrative explaining the type of pro- ject and the description of items needing a special permit. - Type of Project - The proposed project is requesting the development of 96- Senior Citizen housing units. These units will be all 2-Bedroom units containing approximately 800 sq.ft. each. There will be 3 basic floor plan types all of the stacked flats variety. The structures will contain 1 type (Bldg. I and II) with 2-story • units over subterranean parking and 1 type (Bldg. III) with 2-story on grade. The exterior elevations will be of the con- �.. tempory Cape -Cod motif which will be computable with the sur- rounding developments in the area. The materials will consist of a combination of stucco, wood siding, and shake roof for their basic make-up. The individual units will all contain patios or balconies with square footage meeting or exceeding the required minimum. There will be a main recreation area containing the followings Enclosed recreation facility (714 sq.ft.) with these additional amenities; bar-b-ques, benchesg shuffleboard and a putting green. All the required parking will be assigned and located within 200' of each dwelling unit. In addition there will be handicapped units available and the required parking to facilitate them. Finally, the project site will be heavily landscaped with mature landscaping throughout. - Special Permit Items - 1. Density Bonuss We are requesting the Density Bonus because we feel this project will not adversely effect; 1. The city or county water, sewero or storm drain systems. We believe they will all be able to adequately accomodate the proposed increase in density. 2. The traffic volumes, road capacities$ school en- rollments, or recreational resources. 3. The surrounding com- munity or the general plan for this area. In fact, the request is consistent with the master plan and land use element for the area. 1 - - - - Page_ 2 2. 60 Years of Age or Olders This is to be the written assurance that each unit will be occupied by at least one person 60 years of 4ge7vr_c.1ders_ 3. Handicapped Units s We are requesting that 2% of our units be handicapped. The reason for this request is based on research which indi- cates that the state has mandated that only 1% of all new units constucted be handicapped. Also, it has been determined by the Redevelopment Agency that the 10% figure is very excessive from review of previous projects. 4. Site Coverages While it is true that we are slightly over on our site coverage, we feel justified in the fact we have created off- setting amenities: (1) Open Space: Common Open Space/49800 sq.L / Private Open Space @ 120 sq.ft./Unit in Patio's and Balconies x 96=11 20 sq.ft. Required =1 ,3 0 sq.ft. Supplied= Common Open Space= 6,2440 sq.ft. + Prvt. Open Space =12,720 sq.ft. _ IF,9 0 sq.ft. (2) Type and SizeZUnits 00 sq.ft. minimum/2-bdrm Unitt there- fore allows for the individual elderly person who only has so much money to be able to become an owner. (Note the following example). Examples 1-Bdrm. Unit Q $70,000.0O 2-Bdrm. Unit @ $80*000.00 If two retired elderly individuals** buy into a 2-Bdrm unit, their investment is only $40,000.00. They realize a savings of some $309000.00 from the purchase of a 1-Bdrm unit all by themselves. **Divorced or their life partner may be deceased. a.� 0 - ... Page.3 5. Building Separations We have maintained the required 15'-0" minimum in all cases between face of building to face of building thesb :deems to be a discrapency between face of building an(Z-`ace:of beil,ony and/ or architectural projection.) •- 6. 12'-0" End Svace at Parking Structures We believe that this can be worked out through a portion of the parking being designated 'Compact Parking' and also di- mensionally during the working drawing stage of the architec- tural and engineering plan process. 7• Number of Bedrooms/ Gross Acres See No. 1 above. 8. Setback from Interior Property Lines We feel justified in this request due to zi:e fact that we are maintaining the same setbacks as the adjace::: Senior Citizen project to the West (Emerald Cove). In addition, rye do rot have any entrances or balconies of any units adjacent to the Single Family residences. Finally, even though we do have win- dows adjacent to the Southernly property line; we could adjust them to be higher without a view. 9. Parkine Deficiency& We realize that we are deficient with regards to the re- cently adopted parking ordinance of November 19, 1985. Since this would be the first Senior Citizen project approved under the new ordinance code , we feel we should be given some con- sideration because of the past history of this project. We therefor feel it should be noted that under Section No. 4.0 "Issues and Analysis" of the staff report for the new ordinance code; it was determined that the 'Windward Cove' project which also contained 96 units and had a ratio of 1.37 spaces/ unit, realized absolutely no parking problem whatsoever. Consequent- ly, let it be duely noted that our project has a ratio of 1.37 spaces/ unit. pectfulIZZa4_ ohn E. Co wles/ Agent c.c. Lee and Yolanda Collins/ Owner Bob Zweibel and Evelyn Shabo/ Owner Page 2` r... There are two water wells on the site. When these are located, they will have to be abandoned to City standards. ir-- Drainage: All surface flow from Tract 97 to the south of this project goes at present t ough the ubject site, so a public easement will be needed fo rainage• urposes through Lot 5 and through the private stre t o carry his water to Talbert Avenue and connect to the existi g st m dra' system to the west. Glen Godfrey asked that an to ed grad' g plan be prepared to assure that all the lot n t subdiv' ion as well as the ad- joining properties are tie og er for rainage purposes. Rick Doolittle said that hi co an has bee engaged to prepare a master grading plan i h coordin to the sewer, water, and storm drain systems. T ey ill obtai plans for the other tract and make sure that t otal area i properly addressed. Sewers: Lots 1, 2, 3 10, and a westerly portion of Lot 4 are ma ter-pl ned to sewer north to Kovacks Lane; therefore, an eas ment will hav to be dedicated along the north boundary of Lot 0 to accommod to sewer lines. Sewer easements will also be ne ssary in the rivate streets. Streets: 1 n erior str is and access roads in the project i e private. Prior to the recordation of the final /, map, public cc s easeme s and a maintenance agreement will have to be vi d for S reet A. Sidewalks will be necessary, fir-- along the rly edge f the 40-foot street through Lots 9 and 4. All wal s d stree improvements shall be constructed to City standa s. Traffic: In rmatio has been received from Redevelopment since this proj t was reviewed by Public Works, indicating that the entrance wi 1 have a 24-hour guarded gate. In that even a entrance ill require some type of free -flow exit o ' g out of he development because possible stacking at <tha ca on will interfere with the close -by drive coming out of Tract 0. A pu 1-over lane for guests must also be incorpor- ated at this entra ce. Neh off also �n cated that Public Works would like to look irculation plan as they come in on the individual parking and safety reasons. Commissioner Higgins in- qat the basis for requiring review by individual lots would be, and was informed by Savoy Bellavia that under the new SR Suffix it would be required that Lots 6, 7, and 8 will have to come back for further review. Mr. Patapoff said that he would take the revised plans back to the Traffic Division and may have additional comments on the internal circulation when the project comes before the full Commission for review. Landscaping: The landscaping along Talbert Avenue shall be in- stalled on private property and incorporated into the onsite landscaping.plan. r �X� \� V SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Room B-7 - Civic 2000 Main Street r�^ Huntington Beach, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27, 1983 - 8:00 AM COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Higgins, Schumacher Center California CITY STAFF PRESENT: Glen Godfrey, Savoy Bellavia, Jim Barnes, Mike Adams, Bill Patapoff, Larry Marshburn TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11955)CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83-9 Applicant: City of Huntington Beach To permit a 10-lot subdivision, six lots of which are to be dev- eloped as senior citizen housing under the conditional use permit, three lots of which are to be developed later as residential, and Lot 10 of the subdivision to be retained for future development with an industrial use or uses. Subject property is located west of Beach Boulevard on the south side of Talbert Avenue. Rick Doolittle, representing the engineering firm of Holland & Foreman, was present at the meeting. Savoy Bellavia outlined the tract under consideration. Lots 1 through 5 and Lot 9 are to be developed under Conditional Use Permi' 83-9; Lots 6, 7, and 8 are not being proposed for development at this time; and Lot 10 is included in the tract so that it will be a legally divided, salable lot for future industrial use. The pro- ject is under two separate ownerships and will be developed with two product types: Lots 1, 2, and 3 will contain for -sale condominium units and Lots 4, 5, and 9 will be rental apartments. The City owns Lots 1, 2, 3, and 10 and will acquire Lot 4; Lots 5 and 9 are pri- vately owned. Bill Patapoff presented the following comments from Public Works: Water: The existing 8-inch water main in Talbert is undersized and a 12-inch main will have to be constructed; this will include some offsite changes from the 21-inch line at the westerly side of Lot 10. The water lines in Talbert Avenue will have to be carried through the -frontage of the project 1500 linear feet to provide adequate domestic and fire flow pressure. The map shows an 8-inch water line stubbed in at both the access road from Taylor and A Street. The Water Division has stated that this line may have to be a 10-inch line, but in any case the line will have to be looped prior to the project being built, from A Street through the access road. All the water systems will be dedicated with easements, since they are in private streets. t1EJl 11 l / , 1` v 3� Page 2 r, There are two water wells on the site. When these are located, they will have to be abandoned to City standards. 40 Drainage: All surface flow from Tract 8197 to the south of this project goes at present through the subject site, so a public easement will be needed for drainage purposes through Lot 5 and through the private street to carry this water to Talbert Avenue and connect to the existing storm drain system to the west. Glen Godfrey asked that an integrated grading plan be prepared to assure that ::11 the lots in the subdivision as well as the ad- joining properties are tied together for drainage purposes. Rick Doolittle said that his company has been engaged to prepare a master grading plan which will coordinate the sewer, water, and storm drain systems. They will obtain plans for the other tract and make sure that the total area is properly addressed. Sewers: Lots 1, 2, 3, 10, and the westerly portion of Lot 4 are master -planned to sewer north to Kovacks Lane; therefore, an easement will have to be dedicated along the north boundary of Lot 10 to accommodate sewer lines. Sewer easements will also be necessary in the private streets. Streets: All interior streets and access roads in the project will be private. Prior to the recordation of the final map, public access easements and a maintenance agreement will have to be provided for Street A. Sidewalks will be necessary �-- along the westerly edge of the 40-foot street through Lots 9 and 4. All walks and street improvements shall be constructed to City standards. Traffic: Information has been received from Redevelopment since this project was reviewed by Public Works, indicating that the entrance will have a 24-hour guarded gate. In that event, the entrance will require some type of free -flow exit coming out of the development because possible stacking at that location will interfere with the close -by drive coming out of Tract 11560. A pull -over lane for guests must also be incorpor- ated at this entrance. Mr. Patapoff also indicated that Public Works would like to look at each circulation plan as they come in on the individual lots for parking and safety reasons. Commissioner Higgins in- quired what the basis for requiring review by individual lots would be, and was informed by Savoy Bellavia that under the new SR Suffix it would be required that Lots 6, 7, and 8 will have to come back for further review. Mr. Patapoff said that he would take the revised plans back to the Traffic Division and may have additional comments on the internal circulation when the project comes before the full Commission for review. Landscaping: The landscaping along Talbert Avenue shall be in- stalled on private property and incorporated into the onsite landscaping plan. ;b Minutes, - Sub! ...,.on Committee • `.�' April 27, 1983 ... ...� Page 3 Miscellaneous: Lots 2 and 3 on the locked. Some type must be provided for accessing these map are at present land - of reciprocal easement lots. A noise study for the project has been completed. Fire Department: Representative Larry Marshburn said the Fire Department has no significant comments about the plan at this time. Mike Adams demonstrated the revisions which have been made to the plan, with the intent being to provide a more efficient use of space and attempt to make the two separate building types appear to be one integrated project. The changes have allowed 6 side -by - side units in some places rather than 5; have better oriented units toward the open space; have provided walk-through to the main clubhouse from both areas; and lessened the number of units con- structed face-to-face. The units which remain face-to-face have been provided with offsets or good building separation to main- tain privacy. The units adjacent to the R1 area to the south have been laid out so they do not face the other residential type, and it is likely that no doors or windows in the walls siding on to the R1 will be allowed, to further protect privacy of the single-family homes. Mr. Adams pointed out that the first plan had not used the exact measurements on the tentative map, resulting in some dimensionsing problems; e.g., a parking bay appears to have sufficient space, but when drawn on a properly measured plat will require that the adjacent street be red -curbed for access. Mr. Godfrey pointed out that the Fire Department had had some access problems at a few other locations on the map, and it had been recommended that the units there be fire sprinklered throughout to compensate. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Schumacher discussed the provision of intensive land- scaping to help separate this project from the adjoining industrial properties and the provision of a public walkway through a private project to access Terry Park from the north. The Committee and staff discussed the possibility of providing an easement on the City -owned Lot 10 so that the walk could be moved out of this pro- ject and still provide the intended public access. Mrs. Schumacher also cautioned staff to make sure that the legalities of putting a private street through a public park were addressed before this project is finalized. Also reviewed and discussed by the Committee was the possible con- flict which might result from one recreational facility to serve both projects. Staff explained the rationale for this provision and also that both the rental and the ownership units would con- tribute to its upkeep. Staff will provide alternative walkway and landscaping treatments for review by the full Commission. ._011 Minutes - Suft ile ion Committee April 27, 1983 Page 4 The meeting adjourned at 9:00 a.m. mow. 1 ;av5o:lvraM.4elya-v-ia,&S-e�c�retary :df Llo 0 R CITY OF HUNTINGTON SEA ar DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT P. O. sox 190 Huntington Bad+. CA. 92648 Tel: 1714) M5271 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DORM •. Serge Zweibel/Lee and Yolanda Collins Ann scant Authorized Agent 8649 E. Seventh St., Downey 90241 Mailino Address 1-213-636-5654 Telephone Was above ^ronertNt. Mner Same as above mailing Address Telephone Im FOR CITY USE ONLY Date Received: Project Ny 6&,z Number: ' Department of Origin: Other Applications or Permit Numbers: 4C r ' 2' Z- 1.0 Project Information (please attach Plot Plan and submit p otograp s of s ject property) 1.1 Nature of Project: Give complete description of the proposed project. 96-Unit senoir citizen redevelopment housing project; 2-story structures with subterranean parking (were occurs). Contemporary cape -cod architectural style with wood shake roof, stucco and wood ship -lap siding. l.� Location of Protect: (Address, nearest street intersections) Happy Drive at the intersection of Jolly Lane and Joy Street: South of Talbert Avenue and west of Beach Blvd. 1.3 Assessor's Parcel Number: 159-141-40, etc. (See legal description and property variance report) RG✓CGT L_A`.a a�•�trr: IIM ■2DW'Mt rft 'I' wr b.l • N II, R.1, w h MI '1' tY N• It � MI 't'• M/ w. II. 1•rf ll•1M Mr Ir•It1wIrl .�.•1 1 •uf 1win1 Wt, INt • ,. we �wuO 1 . r,r h1N 1 f M NII.• Mb �yg N • M • tr.lr w h II.N ,rrI ItAt M' � I b4Nw .fR�• w. h1.. III.Ir wtiil)• •wl. r.t, w. n n1Niy �• 9 ^�� ww� — ��Mw ` 1� w� 1 rR�ti r Mr . I,t tlr.Atb • IM n•w ~ w ,tr t u rww,Mr • IR rwn •h�I/bp..lN.�MN 1r,f . i�i� � 1 r•� M LIIIlli!!Illllll T, I ■ lmli�� 0m'�,—`��, _I G .� ►nr +n..w ttM 5 l S6GtiG till,' A/rl ttl•'r • �ly�! /IIr lwV/ _ ..•r :..�ry pn.//'Mrs —UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN 40) HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT OJEC. Ei'r " vagTfN4rVY AeAgW O w•NC,CyL vt 1.0,P-PA: ZWEIBEL & COLLINS lit1M �r r� �� to �� f••�,�� f� ICC �,Rt'R*Iffllt�� w,.I it,ll, I SITE, PLAN . _ Lot 5 s R4SR 1 .4 What is the present zoriirg: on:-:!*.*: property? Lot 6 R2P0 I.S what is the surrounding Land,.use to the: North Multiple resiJentJa1 cnndo&irium _ South. single family residential East vacant _ West senior citizen housing project 1.6 If the project is commercial or industrial give a complete description of activities and other pertinent information including but not limited to estimated employment per shift and any potential hazardous materials which may be used, etc. N/A 1.7 If the project is residential, indicate number, types and size of units and associated facilities. `-- 96-Units; 3/2-bedroom units; all units are.approximately 800 sq.ft.+; common recreation and leisure area with recreation room including. amenities such as: bar-b-ques, benches, shuffle hoard and putting green 1.8 If the project is institutional, indicate the major function, estipated employment per shift and maximum occupancy. N/A 1.9 Project land area (acres) 2.24 Number of parking spaces 134 1.10 Square feet of building area 40,400 Number of floors 2 1.11 Height o' tallest structure involved in the project 33'-6" 2.0 Environmental Setting 2.1 Drainage and Flood Control -11 r 1Cen-vtgicEfngineriV'fi i wi }�e drainage will be accommodated. prepare a grading plan creating the required swales, gutters etc. to allow site to drain toward street gutters and sewe • 2.2 Land Form 2. 3 2.4 2.5 2.6 a) Is the *:to preoenfly a,Ca�id? . No b) Indicate'the gross*cubrc pards of gradina proposed see grading the acres of land -to be graded 2.24 the amoun earth to be- -t r*sk"orEed on the site - - , and the amount of eartjv to be ;transported off the site None c) What will be the maximum height �I and grr.de of cut orf i i 1 after •trading is completed? 18 above existing natural grade to finish pad. Soils a) 'type of soils on the subject site? (Submit soils report if available). Ramona Fine Vegetation a) Attach a mao indicating the location, type and size of trees located on the site. Indicate below the number, type and size of trees to be removed as a result of the project. None Water (duality a) Does any portion of the project abut or encroach on beaches. .estuaries, bays, tidelands, or inland Vater areas? No b) -Describe how the project will effect any body of water. N/A Air nuality a) If the project is industrial, describe and list air pollution sources and quantity and types of pollutants N/A emitted as a result of the project. 2. 7 Noise a) fk-- srribe any adjacent Off -Site noise sources (i .e. , tiir- 1x<rrv, indiist ry, freeways) "N/A 11) Wit -it will be produced by the pro7.•ct: If avail4b! plo-Ise Olive noise levels in decible measurement and typi� time distribution when noise will be produced. `- Minimal noise generated by project C. stow w.11 noise produced by the project compare with existing nCise ke"el4?-M4�4-ried'. Impact '.A Traffic = - Approximately now'd1ut-h traf6ic will be generated by the project: (check one) 0-50 vehicular trips per day 50 - 250 vehicular trips per day X 250 - 500 vehicular trips per day over 500 vehicular trips per day 3.0 Public Services and Facilities 3.1 Water a) Will the project require installation or replacement of new water lines? No b) Please estimate the daily volume in gallons required to aserve the project. N. 1.2 Sewer a) iWill the project require installation or replacement of new sewer lines? No b) Please indicate the approximate amount of sewage generated from the project. 3.3 Solid Waste a) If the project is industrial, describe the type and amount (pounds/day) of solid waste generated by the project. N/A 4.0 Social 4.1 Population Displacement .,k) Will any residential occupants be displaced by the p.o)ect activities? No I h) Desor ibe briefly the type of buildings or improvements to be demolished by the project. None 41 _ 0 Mitigating Measures ! .. 1 Are there measures imcl�udrd -i.n�tN4p project which may conserve nonrenewable rea ,-urces-:(e'_q. rrxenctricity, gas, water) ? Please describe. State reWirements for insulation at all walls and ceiling areas. .� Are there measures:includect ir_the project which would protect or enhance flora ard.:auba? pease describe. Irrigation system to be IlAialled fof all new lanscaping. .3 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce noise pollution? Please describe. State requirements for insulation at all walls and ceiling areas. 4 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project (e.g. architectural treatment and landscappinq) which have been coordinated with design of the existinq community to ,minimize visual effect? Please describe. Project has been designed to enhance the community and reduce visual impact. (See elevations) 5 Are there measures proposed in the design of the project to reduce water pollution? Please describe. Project has been designed via the grading plan for drainage and circulation of water to reduce water stagnation and pollution. 6 Are there measures proposed which would reduce air pollution? List any Air pollution Control District equipment required. Fireplaces will have damper and be gas operated to reduce air pollution. 7 Are there measures or facilities designed into the project to facilitate resource recovery and/or energy conservation (e.g. solar heating, special insulation, etc.)? Please describe. State requirements for insulation at all wall and ceiling areas. o Alternatives 1 Are there alternatives to the project which may result Ln i lesser adverse environmental effect? Please explain all pro)ec: alternatives on an attached sheet. None hcrehy ccrtify that the information herein is true and accurate to c best of my knowledge. Signature Date Filed 4.4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BNACM Q-: INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Susan Pierce From ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SECTION Subject NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date February 20, 1986 NO. 86-2 Applicant: Serge Zweibel/Lee & Yolanda Collins 8649 E . Seventh Street Downey, California 90241 Request: Location: Background Change the zoning from QR2-PO (Qualified Medium Density Residential - qualifying various development requirements) to R2-SR (Medium Density Res i den t i a l-senior residential) Happy Drive and the intersection of Jolly Lane b Joy Street, approximate 225 feet south of Talbert Avenue and 400 feet west of Beach Boulevard. Based on the Staff's initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration qis published in the local newspaper and posted in a Office of the City Clerk r a 10-day public review period ending — o--d C d 4.- to i rents. the attached cowlleen s were received. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Section recommends that the approve Negative Dec aration o. finding that the propose project w 1 not have a significant adverse ect on the environment. Mitigation Measures The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential environmental effects re�suTting from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval. Respectfully submitted, Diana Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner r -!�," CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0 STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. BACKGROUND 1. Applicant Serge Zweibel/Collins' ?. Address 86A9 E. Seventh Street _ Dawnex..+_ CA-9-9 41.- - - - - .. ___ -- - 3. Telephone 4. Project Location HaPPy _ Driv_e & _inters_ ection of�o-1 y ane Y Street Pinlect Title/I)escript.ion Change zone fry -�S-to _ _ Dd t V _ February._ 20L 1986 II. INVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheet). 1. Physical Environment: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flera and fauna, 0) noise, f) archaeological/historical. Yes Maybe No Other '. Ini_ paLt of Environme t on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding envir ment? i.e., natural environment; manmade environment. Yes Maybe No 3. Im acts on Public Services: Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, pol e, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Maybe No 4. Impacts on Traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment, or impact rroundi'ncirculation system, or increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the existing: land use, population/housi energy/utilities, natural resources, himian health? Yes _ _ Maybe No �-- i,. Ut.tivr• potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet). III, 0THfft RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSON CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FtNDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: 1. Will project degrade quality of environment? Yes Maybe No 2. Will project achieve short-term is to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Yes Maybe No 3. Does the project have impacts which are lindividually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes Maybe No 4. Will the project adverse affect human beings either directly or indirectly? Yes Maybe No t/ V. DETERMINATION Negative Declaration ( ) Negative Declaration With Mitigation ( ) Lnvironmental Impact Report 0AI1 � "f 9-- 6 SIGNATURE . ov I� CITY OF HUNTINGTON NEAiCH INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To Jim Palin, Director From Pa fpencer, Program Manager Development Services Housing b Redevelopment Subject CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-2 Date March 26, 1986 ZONE CHANGE NO. 86-2 - COLLINS/ZWEIBEL TALBERT-BEACH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Over the past two (2) years, the Redevelopment staff have met with and encouraged the developer of the proposed project to explore possibilities of providing additional senior citizen housing within the Talbert -Beach Redevelopment Project Area, and staff would fully support such a develop- ment. In our review of both the development plans and developer's narrative to Susan Pierce, dated February 14, 1986, the following comments are offered: 1. Support of elevations being proposed as compatable to it both Windward Cove and Emerald Cove projects; 2. Support reduction of required handicapped units from 10% (Section 9325.7 H.B.O.C.) to the proposed 2%. This support is based on actual need experienced in both Windward Cove and Emerald Cove developments. 3. Could not support proposed project's parking ratios which compute to approximately � space per bedroom, compared to Windward Cove's onsite parking ratios of approximately 1 space per bedroom. 4. Could not support on -street parking as'part'of, required parking ratios, PS:Ip xc: Florence Webb, Development Services Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment Pf- m PI r/A AMMIN HUNTINGTQN BEACH DEVE�OPMFNT SERVICES JUL I i`� �")�5 11. A, DOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Ail. P-e_A t( or TWE 50 Huntington Village Estates Homeowners Association PETI TI 0 N The undersigned members of the Huntington Village Estates Homeowners Association view with grave concern the zone change No. 86-2/ conditional use permit No. 86-2/ tentative tract No. 11955/ negative declaration No. 86-2, cur- rently before the Huntingon Beach Planning Commission regarding the development of the property South of Happy Drive and North of Lori Drive. The undersigned association members are not opposed to planned low density developments of the subject property, but do take strong exception to the changes currently proposed by the developer. K.V.E. is a low density well planned project. The desirability of such well thought out surroundings was a strong consideration for the buyers within this community when looking forward to sustaining and increasing the value of their investments. A high density project as currently proposed by the developer (changing the set backs from 85 feet to 10 feet, doubling density already zoned with 3 story structures that tower over those homes on Lori Drive) would remove all sense of privacy, thereby reducing their current desirability and potential for resale, ultimately affecting the entire area. In consideration of the afore mentioned, the undersigned request that the Huntington Beach City Planning Commission deny the current proposal submitted by the developer in consideration of the following: 1) That the development remain low density. 2) That setbacks be kept as originally zoned at 85 feet. 3) That no 3 story structures be allowed on the minimum setbacks. 4) That only one story structures be allowed at minimum setbacks. 5) That H.V.E. have final approval of landscaping that directly adjoins our dividing wall, i.e. specimen trees, not small deciduous trees. 6) That there be no windows other than bathroom type overlooking H.V.E. The undersigned members of H.V.E. Homeowners Association are extremely proud of our community as we believe it stands out as being exemplary of current revitali- zation in our area, i.e. Charter Centre, 5-Points Plaza, etc. To allow the developer to proceed as proposed would significantly undermine the recent strides made by the City of Huntington Beach in this area. This is clearly not in keeping with the long term goals of keeping Huntington Beach a place high on the list of desirability as a place to live and work. A � Signed: H.V.E. Association N 1w r F1UNtINCtON IstACH 7 ���:.OF ,',E ,;T �F.R1�lCES f�.-�� /?.'.- ^ (-2 �./ Address / �.J' _ UK. Huntln!;toll Beech, CA 92W. e VJL 7831 Connie Dnoe, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 611 'C' ZZ