HomeMy WebLinkAboutBeach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) - February 2/2/2015
BECSP
SHORTAND
LONG TERM
AMENDMENT OPTIONS
BEACH AND EDINGER CORRIDORS SPECIFIC PLAN
(BECSP)
February 2, 2015 - City Council Study Session
BECSP Project Area
Speahc FI.Ylan.uez IA
❑ Beach and Edinger
-
Corridors Specific Plan ' - L
s �
adopted on March 1,
2010. r' ;� 7a _ a
n e r
n3-
❑ The Specific Plan areas Y
encompasses 459 ;1
acres primarily along � �
both the Edinger
Avenue Corridor and `� n� ��,
Beach Boulevard. FEW
��` ��
2/2/2015 '
BECSP Background
❑ In 2006,City Council initiated the BECSP in response to the issues facing the
corridors in an effort to enhance the overall economic performance,physical
beauty and functionality of the Corridors with objectives to:
o Position the City such that it would remain competitive and attractive to businesses.
o Re-position disinvested corridor properties to capture value in the contemporary
marketplace
o Realign development policies and planned public investments to capitalize on the
current primary market trends
o Provide a reliable environment for investors that spell out municipal requirements in
sufficient detail and that provides enhanced reliability and clarity as to character of
future development
n Capitalize on residents with discretionary spending potential to support
restaurants,quick foods,electronics,fashion and accessories and services,
thereby spinning off additional retail spending.
❑ Community engagement:Various public meetings including 6 community
workshops,8 Planning Commission study sessions,3 City Council study
sessions,PC/CC field trips,3 public hearings
BECSP Residential Development
❑ MAND(Maximum Amount of Net New Development)approved by City Council
was for 4,500 residential units
Residential MAND Status
rM-
Units Allowed by 4,500 1,745 2,755
EIRIBECSP
Units Permitted to date 1,900 1,375 525
Units Remaining.. 2,600 370 2;230
Potential Units/Projects in 1,200 0 1,200
Pipeline
❑ 1,900 total units permitted to date+1,200 potential unitsiproject in the pipeline
❑ 3,100 total units(approx.69%MAND)
2
' 2/2/2015
Current Projects
z
1.HB Lofts(mixed use)
378 units(under construction)
Iml A . Hp;,A. 2.Boardwalk(mixed use)
487 units(first two phases occupied)
3.Monogram (multi-family residential)
N. 510 units(in plan check)
4.Oceana(multi-family residential)
— — 78 units(under construction)
E. 5.Elan mixed use
GAF 274 units under construction
1 ( )
6.Beach&Ocean(multi-family residential)
&� 173 units(occupied)
b Total Residential Units-1,900
61
Short Term Options (already implemented
y staff)
❑ All residential developments are referred to Planning
Commission with a fully noticed public hearing
❑ A minimum square footage of retail space is
lepback
recommended for all residential developments
❑ Building setbacks from the public street are required
to be increased from current required minimums 3�3trrY -
�b]ry kbS=CExk
❑ Minimum 10'upper story setback for all floors above 2'a
3 stories(to reduce building massing and density) rro na Flaor
❑ Parking study required to insure on-site residential
parking is adequate for the mix of bedroom units and
retail uses
3
2/2/2015
Long Term Options
❑ Long-Term Options require a code amendment to the BECSP
with review by the Planning Commission and adoption by the
City Council
❑ Long Term options may include:
o Reduce the MAND from 4,500 to 3,100 dwelling units
o Require Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission for
all residential and mixed use projects
o Incorporatelcodify the Short-term Options
o Evaluate on-site minimum parking space requirements
o Modify development regulations to give greater flexibility for auto
dealership uses (i.e.-reduce frontage coverage requirements)
BECSP Traffic Impact Review
Review of Vehicle Trip Generation
Short and Long Term Amendment Options
4
2/2/2015
Program EIR Trip Generation
Trip generation is the expected number of trips generated per a site's land use.
Residential uses generate 20%-25%of commercial per square foot of structure
Daily 268,779 353,965. 294,282:.: (59,683)':
Peak AM 14,977 18,435 17,371 ( 1,064)
Peak PM 10,712 26,533 23,227 ( 3,306)
Pre-BECSP zoning would have allowed up to 5.7 million sq ft of commercial;
6,063 dwelling units;and 989,000 sq ft of office space.
EIR Mitigation for the BECSP is based on full build out of the Specific Plan
(12,100 residential units) not Council imposed MAND.
ADT Traffic Example:
Comparing former use to BECSP use
Monogram Apts. 510 units 3,392 260 317
(750,000 sq.ft.)
Commercial(prior) 150,000 sq.ft. 3,225 204 265
Elan Apartments 274 units + 2,094 147 173
8,500 sq.ft
commercial
Commercial/Gas Station 27,540 sq.ft. + 1,183 28 102
New uses are up to 5 times the square footage of building/structure but
generate 20-25%the traffic impacts per square foot.
5
2/2/2015
Level of Service (LOS) Standards
❑ City has adopted LOS D as standard for most
major intersections
❑ Consistent with countywide standards
❑ Mitigation needed only if worse than LOS D
❑ Individual LOS experience different depending on
traffic movement
❑ Signal timing significantly affects perceived LOS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2005/200 2009 2014
6 „
EDINCER AVE. EDINGER AVE. EDINGER AVE.
HEIL AYE. �: HEIL AVE. HELL AVE.
WARNER AV;. WARNER AVE WARNER AVE.
c =
SLATER AYE SL4:EER SLATER A=F.
TALBERT AVE. m TALBERT Al/E. -ALBERT AVE. m
ELUS AYE. w ELJS AYE. a.US AVE. Traffic Volume
GARRELA AYE. GARFlELD AVE. GAR'UD AW.
YORKTOWN AVE TORt-OW,J AVE. YORR'CWN Arc. Decrease
ADAUS AVE AOAUS A'VE. 10AIA1 AVE Minimal
INDIANAPOUS A INDIANA OLIS AVEINDIANA OLIS Alchange
ATLANTA A'r. ATLANTA AV-- ATLANTA AVE.
IN IN Increase
-THCJSANDS OF VEHICLES PER DAY
6
` 2/2/2015
LEVEL OF SERVICE
2005/ZOD6 TRAFFIC COUNTS 2D04 TRAFFIC COUNTS 2014 TRAFFIC COUNTS
\\ \
A < 9/0 �OV]FR A/A NCR AI'— A/B
3'=
EDINCER AVE EDINCER AVE. ED ER INC AVE. _
HEIL AVE. _ JEIL AVE, 17A .
_/CB/CA/CWARNER AVE. WARNER AYE. B/BB/CSLATER AVE. BCTALBERT AVE. � - 3, /D A/CR/CELLIS AVE. ELUS AVE. —D/DC/C
uARFI=LD AVE.r" GAR=IELD AVE.W GARFIELD AVE. t
A/B
YORKTOWN AVE. B/D TORKTOWN AVE. - PORK TOWN A/A AVE.
B/C 4/B AfR
ADAMS AVE. _ ADAMS AVE. ADAMS AVC. _
;NOIAN APOLIS AV A/A
E. A/C A/H
INDIANAPOLIS A INOIANAPGLIS AV
A/A
ATLANTA AVE. _- ATLAN TA AVE. A/A ATLAN7A AVE. A/A
A/C A/A /B
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE(LOS) AM/PM
Current/Planned Improvements
❑ Beach/Edinger
O Reconfigure street markings and adjust off romp to provide 4 northbound thru lanes on Beach Boulevard(current project)
❑ Beach/Warner
c Widen east approach to intersectionto provide a dedicated right turn lane
D Project on-hold due to recent traffic volume decreases in the area and grant funding restrictions
❑ Beach/Ellis
IT Reconfigure the intersection of Beach/Main and remove traffic signal controls at that intersection
❑ Edinger Corridor
IT Traffic signal coordination implementation to synchronize overall traffic signal system and reduce delays/stops for
motorists along the corridor.
❑ 1-4051mnrovelnents
17 Joint OCTA&Caltrans project for major capacity improvements along the corridor from Valley View/Bolso Chico to SR 73
c Major improvements at Beach/1-405 interchange
c Widening of all bridge crossings of freeway including Newland,Edinger&McFadden bridges
D Interchange improvements at Goldenwest/1-405
D Widen the west approach at Beach/Edinger and modify on-ramp to 2 lanes
D Project experiencing some delays due to issues between Caltrans,OCTA and local agencies regarding potential toll
component of Caltrans'locally preferred alternative
❑ Gothard/Center
D Current project to replace old traffic signal equipment and add left turn arrows
7
2/2/2015 '
Potential Projects
MEMO-
❑ Edinger/Sher
0 Widen south leg of intersection to better align with Bella
Terra driveway lanes allowing more efficient traffic
operations
❑ Edinger/Parkside
o Widen south leg of intersection to better align with Bella
Terra driveway lanes and eliminate existing "split phase"
signal operation
❑ Beach Boulevard Corridor
o Potential project with Caltrans to update existing traffic
Signal coordination along the corridor
Traffic Projects Outside BECSP
BOB
B
❑ Brookhurst/Adams
a Significant widening and capacity improvements planned for all portions of intersection
a Completed prelim engineering and EIR. Currently preparing final plans in a phased
approach per City Council direction.
a No funding for construction and R/W at this time.
❑ Goldenwest Corridor
a Traffic signal coordination project along entire length of Goldenwest including coordination
with Westminster traffic signals north of McFadden.
a Project will reduce delays along corridor and provide a viable alternative to Beach
Boulevard for many commuters.
❑ Warner Corridor
a Traffic signal coordination project along entire length of Warner Avenue including
coordination with Fountain Valley traffic signals west of Magnolia and extending into Santa
Ana.
a Project will reduce delays along corridor and provide a viable alternative to Edinger
Avenue for some commuters.
8
2/2/2015
Traffic Impact Fees
.-�, a. - -..�.`c•� �--` -sue- - ,ter"
Elan $129,767` Y
Beach&Ocean $77,385 Y
Oceana $108,777 N
Boardwalk $588,597 Y
HB Lofts $233,232 Y
Monogram est.$130,000 N
Total $1,267,758
• Current Traffic Impact Fee Fund balance $3.1 million
• Traffic Impact Fees based on net new trips
Next Steps (3®6 months)
❑ Community Outreach
® Workshop
® PC/CC Study Sessions
❑ Environmental Analysis
® CEQA Compliance
❑ Prepare Draft DECSP
❑ Public Hearings
9
2/2/2015
Questions/Discussion
10