HomeMy WebLinkAboutCode Amendment 86-15 - Ordinance 2848 - Miscellaneous Distri 109
CITY ®F HUNTI'NOTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMU ATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Charles W. Thompson o 0 James W. Palin, Director
City Administrator �0 Development Services
Subject ORDINANCE NO. 2848 - Date June 6, 1986 Y�
CIVIC DISTRICT SUFFIX;
COMMUNITY FACILITIES OVERLAY
MULTI-STORY SUFFIX AND
QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15
Ordinance No . 2848 was scheduled for adoption at the June 2, 1986
City Council meeting. However, the item was continued to the June
16 , 1986 meeting because of the building heights issue which could
have a bearing on the ordinance .
At the June 2, 1986 City Council meeting the building heights issue
was referred back to the Planning Commission for a report . An Ad
Hoc Committee was also formed to discuss and to prepare a
recommendation regarding building heights . The Ad Hoc Committee
recommended and the Planning Commission concurred that no
modification to heights limits are needed in these districts . No
heights modification had been proposed in the Ordinance. The
Ordinance reflects the current heights that presently exist in the
Zoning Code.
Recommendation: Staff recommends the second reading of Ordinance
No. 2848 and its adoption at the June 16, 1986 City Council meeting.
JWP :FW: kla
(5357d-3 )
LJ
Ur h
�� C-0
10
BUILDING HEIGHTS
i
District/Type Existing Planning Commission Ad-hoc Committee
Project Code Action Recommendation
RA 30 ' 25 ' Per Planning
Commission
R1 30 ' 251 , max. 2 stories Per Planning
(30 ' and/or 3 stories Commission
with CUP)
R2 , R3 , R4 301 ( 35 ' with 25 ' (30 ' with add ' 1 Leave Existing Code
Base District add ' 1 setbacks ) setbacks )
R2 , R3 , R4 35 ' 30 ' Leave Existing Code
Apartment Standards
R1 , R2 , R3 , R4 35 ' 30 ' ( staff recommends Leave Existing Code
Planned Developments leaving 35 ' as is )
( condos )
Oldtown/Town Lot/ Not affected by any code amendment
Downtown Specific
Plans
JA:pb
( 52a1d )
70 11,004
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kinds including public
notices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County,
California, Number A-6214, dated 29 September, t961, and
A-24831. dated 11 June. 1963.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange PubtK Not" Advertising Covered
by this sina"i is so in point
with 10 pica colunw+width -
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of CODE AMENDMENT
NO.88-1s
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen MISCELLANEOUS
DISTRICTS AND
years, and not a party to or interested in the below SUFFIXES
NOTICE IS HEREBY
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange GIVEN that the Huntington
Beach City Council will hold
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the a public hearing ln the Coun-
cil Chamber at the Hunt-
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, Ington Beach Civic Center,
2000 Main Street, Hunt-
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, Ington Beach,California,on
the date and at the time In-
County of Orange, State of California, and that a dlcated below,to receive and
consider the to
of
Notice of PUBLIC HEARING all persons who wish to be
heard relative to the appll-
cation described below.
DATE:'Monday, May 19,
1986 ,
TIME::7:30 P.M.
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete APPLICATION NUMBER:
Code Amendment 86-15
wide
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, PROPOSAL:TIorepealex-
IstIng New ort Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valle 964AAof thes e
Huntin967,gton
p g y� 964A of the Huntington
Irvine, the South Coast communities and La Una Beach Ordinance Code and
g add new Article 946 related
1 time to provisions for the civic
Beach issues of said newspaper for district suffix,community is-
cilitles overlay, muitl-story
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of suffix and qualified classi-
fication and to retitle
Chapter 94,"Miscellaneous
Districts and Suffixes."
ENVIRONMENTAL
May 8 198 6 empt from the provisions of
the California Environmental
Quality Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the
198 proposed ordinance Is on
file In the Department of De-
velopment Services.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
, 198 SONS are Invited to attend
said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence
for or against the application
as outlined above.All appli-
198 cations, exhibits, and de-
scrlptlons of this proposal
are on f!!e with the Office of
the City Clerk, 2000 Main
198 Street, Huntington Beach,
California,for Inspection by
the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH
CITY COUNCIL, By: Alicia
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the Pho Wentworth,714)6 Clark,
foregoing is true and correct. Dated:May 5,1986
Published Orange Coast
Daily Pilot May 8,1986
Th888
Executed on May 12 , 198 6
at Co to Mesa, California.
-
Signature
�- eay
-S
REQUE FOR CITY COUNCP ACTION
Date May 19 , 1986
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City .Administra o N
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services
Subject: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15 (-CD, CF, -MS, and Q)
Consistent with Council Policy? yQ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception OPD ��U
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Code Amendment No. 86-15 is a request to repeal existing Articles
966, 967, 934 , and 964A and add new Article 946, which will include
all provisions for the civic district suffix, community facilities
overlay, multi-story suffix and qualified classification and to
retitle Chapter 94, "Miscellaneous Districts and Suffixes . "
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission action and recommendation on April 15, 1986 :
ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY ERSKINE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVED CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15 AND RECOMMENDS ADOPTION BY THE
CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Livengood, Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Schumacher
ABSTAIN: None
Staff recommendation is identical to that of the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS:
Code Amendment No. 86-15 cleans up and consolidates four existing
articles into one. The only substantive change has been the
deletion of archaic language.
The Qualified classification (Q) is the one designation in which
changes have ,been incorporated. The "Q" classification wording has
been modified to more clearly reflect the manner in which it is
utilized .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
�G
PI O 4/84
FUNDING SOURCE•
Not applicable .
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Modify ordinance as desired .
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Ordinance (4 pp. )
2. Existing Articles 967, 966, 934 , and 964A ( 8 pp. )
3. Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 15, 1986
4 . Planning Commission Minutes dated April 15 , 1986
p JWP:JA:kla
RCA - 5/19/86 -2- ( 4689d)
r
PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICT S . 9670
� L
5T I N (T ARTICLE 967
• �� CIVIC DISTRICT SUFFIX
kl5b57
S . 9670 STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PURPOSE. This article is adopted
pursuant to Government Code 8 ection 65850 et seq. and is
designed and intended to establish a method whereby the city may
regulate the orderly, harmonious, attractive and aesthetic development
of facilities around designated Community Facilities Districts in order
to protect and preserve the character and integrity of the public devel-
opment or facility, and thereby protect and preserve the public health,
safety, convenience and general welfare .
s . 9671 ZONING REGULATIONS . After public hearings as provided for,
zone changes In this code, the civic district suffix ( -CD)
may be combined with any basic zoning district and thereafter a developer
shall comply with all requirements of the basic zoning district in
addition to the requirements of this article.
S . 9672 REVIEW OF PLANS . Unless plans, elevations and proposed
sites for b=ings or structures in a civic district area,
have been approved by the Design Review Board or upon appeal by Council,
no building permit shall be issued for any such building, structure or
other development of property or appurtenances or alterations thereto.
S . 9673 EXCEPTIONS . When, in the opinion of the Director of Planning,
the approval of an application for a minor or insignificant
building permit does not defeat the purposes and objects of this article,
a building permit may be issued without submitting the matter to the
Design Review Board for its approval.
S . 9674. APPLICATION FOR REVIEW. Applications for design review
required by this article shall be filed and reviewed in the
same manner as provided in Article 985 of this code .
The Design Review Board is to consider whether plans sub-
mitted comply with criteria adopted by resolution for the civic district .
If such criteria are met, the application shall be approved . •
Conditions may be applied when the proposed building or structure does
not comply with the above criteria and shall be such as to bring said,
building or strucutre into conformity. If an application is disapproved,
the Design Review Board shall detail in its findings the criterion, or
criteria, that are not met . The action taken by the Design Review
Board shall be reduced to writing signed by the chairman. and a copy
thereof made available to the applicant upon request.
CA-86-ly
r
S . 9675 ' MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICT PLANNING
S . 9675 PLAN RE(;UIRED. Applicant shall submit a plan which shall
)e drawn to scale .and : shall indicate the following informa-
t ion:
(a.) 'Dimensions and orientation of the parcel .
(b) Location of buildings and structures both existing and proposed .
(c) Location of off-street parking and loading facilities .
(d)' Location and dimensions of present and proposed street and high-
way •d,ed'ications required to handle the traffic generated by the
proposed uses .
(e) Location of points of entry .and exit for motor vehicles and
internal circulation pattern .
(f) Location of walls and fences and the indication of their height
and the materials of their construction.
(g) Indication of exterior lighting standards and devices adequate
to review possible hazards and disturbances to the public and
adjacent properties .
(h) Location and size of exterior signs and outdoor advertising .
( i) A preliminary landscaping plan .
(j) Grading and slopes where they affect the relationship of the
buildings .
(k) Indication of- the heights of buildings and structures .
(1) Indication of the proposed use of the buildings shown on the site .
(m) Such other architectural and engineering data as may be required
to permit necessary findings that the provisions of this code are
being complied, with.
e
(n) Any of the above requirements may be waived by the Plannin!;
Director if the information i.s ' deemed noV essential.
Where an attachment or minor addition to an existing building or
structure is proposed, the plan shall indicate the relationship
of such proposal to the existing, development.
s • 9676 EFFECTIVE' DATE OF DECISION. The decision of the Design Review
Board shall not become effective until the expiration of
ten (10) days after the date upon which a ruling was made .
S . 9677 APPEALS . The applicant, or any interested party may file an
appeal to the Planning Commission on any ruling by the
Design Review Board made pursuant to this article . The appeal shall
be filed or made within ten ( 10) days following the decision of the
Board and shall set forth alleged inconsistency or nonconformity with .�
the procedures or criteria set forth in this article or standards set
forth in or pursuant to 5his code . Appeals shall; be heard and decisions
of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to the procedures
set in Article 988 of this code .
PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICT S . 9660
K ( 571 ARTICLE 966
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
5
S . 9660 STATEMENT OF INTENT. In order to fa.cilitiate development of
property around property used by the city or another public
agency for educational, recreational, health, safety, governmental and
other public purposes, a, community facilities district (CF-) is hereby
created .
S . 9661 METHOD OF DESIGNATION. The community facilities symbol,
hereinafter specified , shall be placed on the official zoning
maps of the city by the Planning Director to designate property which
is being used for the above purposes and to designate property which
has been acquired by the city, or another public agency for such pur-
poses . No hearing shall be required for such a, designation .
S . 9662 SYMBOLS
CF-C: Civic uses including city administrative offices,
police facility, fire stations, city maintenance
yards, parking lots or other civic structures or
uses .
CF-E: Education institutions
CF-R: Recreational areas
CF-H: Hospitals
PLANNING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS S. 9340
X ( ARTICLE 934
MULTI-STORY SUFFIX (MS)
JE,: (1944-10/74, 2185-5/77)
S. 9340 +—'PURPOSE. The purpose of the multi-story suffix zoning classifica-
tion is to allow and regulate multi-story development in a manner
consistent with the General Plan and policies of the City of Huntington Beach. It
is specifically the purpose of the multi-story suffix to establish areas wherein
the building height limits contained in the base zoning district may fie exceeded.
The development standards contained in phis article are minimum requirements for
all multi-story developments within the City of Huntington Beach and are intended
to insure that all multi-story developments enhance the physical, social, and
environmental characteristics and conditions of the community.
S. 9341 APPLICATION OF ARTICLE. The provisions of this article shall apply
to all real property having the multi-story (MS) suffix added to the
base zoning district according to the' zone change procedures of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code. Real property designated (-MS) shall be developed in conformance
with the provisions of this article and, unless otherwise provided by this article,
the requirements of the base district zoning and any applicable provision of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall also apply. However, the property owner
shall have the option of developing solely under the provisions of the base zoning
district, in which case the provisions of this article shall not apply.
S. 9342 ESTABLISHMENT OF MULTI-STORY DISTRICT. The multi-story (-MS) suffix
may be combined with the following base zoning districts, provided
y further the Multi-Story Suffix may be affixed only in areas which have been desig-
\.- nated.in the General Plan and Multi-Story location map:
R4 High, Density Residential District
R5 Office Professional District
C2 Commercial Business District
C3 General Commercial District
C4 Highway Commercial District
M1-A Restricted Manufacturing
S. 9343 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIRED. All proposed developments exceeding
the maximum height indicated in the base zoning district shall be
subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission and shall
be subject to the requirements contained in Article 984 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code.
S. 9344 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The development standards contained in this
article shall apply to all developments exceeding the maximum height
allowed in the base zoning district.
S. 9345 RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY. All residential multi-story (-MS suffix
zoned) developments in residential base zoned districts shall comply
with the following requirements:
(a) Minimum Site Area. The minimum site area for residential multi-story.develop-
ment shall be not less than seventeen thousand (17,000) square feet.
(5/18/77)
S. 9345(b) CIAL DEVELOPMENTS PLANNING
(b) Setbacks. The following minimum setbacks shall apply:
(1) Front Yard and Exterior Side Yard Setback. The minimum front yard and
exterior side yard setback shall be ten (10) feet; provided further that an
additional setback of two (2) feet for every ten (10) feet of building height
or each additional story in excess of thirty-five (35) feet building height
plus an additional one (1) foot setback for each ten (10) feet of building
length facing said yard shall be required.
(2) Rear Yard and Interior Side Yard Setback. The minimum rear yard and
interior side yard setback shall be ten (10) feet, provided further that an
additional one (1) foot setback for every ten (10) feet of building height or
each additional story in excess of the thirty-five (35) feet of building height "
plus an additional one (1) foot setback for each ten (10) feet of building
length facing said yard shall be required.
(c) Minimum Dwelling Unit Size. The minimum floor area for any residential dwelling
unit constructed wider the provisions of this article shall conform with the
minimum floor area requirements of the apartment standards, Article 932 of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
(d) Open Space Required. The amount of open space provided shall meet or exceed_____
the open space requirements of the apartment standards, Article 932 of the
Huntington Beach Ordiance Code.
(e) Landscaping. The amount of landscaping provided shall meet or exceed the amount
of landscaping required under the apartment standards, Article '932 of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code.
S. 9346 COMMERCIAL, PROFESSIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL MULTI-STORY. All multi-story
(-MS suffix zoned) developments within commercial, industrial, and
office professional zoned districts shall be developed in compliance with the follow-
ing requirements:
(a) Minimum Site Area. The minimum site area for commercial, professional, and
industrial multi-story developments shall be not less than twenty thousand (20,000)
square feet.
(b) Setbacks. The following minimum setbacks shall apply:
(1) Front Yard and Exterior Side Yard Setback. The minimum front yard and exterior
side yard setback shall be fifty (50) feet. However, where a greater setback is
indicated on the sectional district map, said setback shall apply, provided further
that where a proposed structure exceeds the maximum building height of the base
zoning district an additional setback of one (1) foot shall be provided for each
(10) feet of building height or each story in excess of the base zoning building
height plus an additional one (1) foot setback for each ten (10) feet of building
length facing said yard shall also be required.
(2) Rear Yard and Interior Side Yard Setback. The minimum rear yard and interior
side yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet, provided further that an additional
one (1) foot setback for every ten (10) feet of building height or each additional
story in excess of the maximum building height permitted in the base zoning plus
an additional one (1) foot setback for each ten (10) feet of building length
facing said yard shall be required.
PLANNING SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS - S. 9346(3)
(3) Setback Requirement When Structure Abuts Residential District. When
any proposed commercial, professional, or industrial multi-story structure
abuts a residential district, the minimum setback of the side adjacent
to the residential district shall be fifty (50) feet, provided further that
an additional one (1) foot setback for each two (2) ' feet of building height
in excess of the maximum building height permitted in the base zoning plus
an additional one (1) foot setback for each ten (10) feet of building length
facing said yard shall also be required.
.c /9 n .1 7'7
r PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICT S. 9640 A
CON ARTICLE 964 A
QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION
S. 9640 QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHANGE OF ZONE. Where a rezoning of pro;,
perty is requested by the property owner, provision may be made in
a zoning ordinance that the property not be utilized for all the uses ordinarily
permitted in a particular zone classification and/or that the development of the
site shall conform to certain specified standards, if such limitations are deemed
necessary to protect the best interest of the community and assure a development
more compatible with the surrounding property or neighborhood, to secure an appro-
priate development in harmony with the objectives of the General Plan or to further
mitigate potential adverse effects upon the environment. Where such limitations
are deemed necessary the zoning ordinance may, instead of immediately and finally
rezoning the property, place it in a qualified rezoning classification. The
qualified classification shall be deemed to be a temporary classification and shall
be indicated by the symbol "Q" in parentheses preceding the proposed zoning desig-
nation until such time as the rezoning proceedings shall be either completed or
terminted as hereinafter provided.
S. 9641 USES PERMITTED. While property remains in a qualified classifica-
tion, whether temporary or permanent, it may be used for any of the
uses permitted in such zone prior to the imposition of a qualified classification
on such zone unless said use or uses are prohibited in the zone to which the
property is being changed, or for such uses and subject to such limitations as
are specified in the qualified zone to which the property is being changed. Prior
to the issuance of permits for the construction of buildings or structures authorized
by reason of the qualified zone enactment, the project or use must be submitted to
and approved pursuant to Division 9 and be in full compliance with all limitations
and standards set forth in such qualified classification ordinance.
S. 9642 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Property shall remain in the temporary,
qualified classification for the period of time hereinafter pro-
vided or until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued, or if no certi-
ficate of occupancy is required, a use established in compliance with all provi-
sions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code for one or more of the uses permitted
by such qualified zone ordinance. Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy or
establishment of such use, the qualified classification shall no longer be considered
to be temporary, and the new zone designation shall become finally effective and
shall be placed on the appropriate city records with the symbol "Q" a permanent
part of the symbol designation. All applicable limitations and/or standards within
the qualified zone ordinance shall thereafter be considered to apply permanently
to the specific uses.
S. 9643 TIME LIMIT. Whenever property remains in a qualified classification
for a period of eighteen (18) months after the effective date of
the qualified classification ordinance without substantial physical development
of the uses permitted therein having taken place within such time, or if the Com-
mission determines that such development is not thereafter continuously and expedi-
tiously carried on to completion, or if no physical development is necessary,
without having been used for one or more of the purposes permitted thereby, such
qualified classification rezoning proceedings shall be terminated and the zoning
in effect prior to said qualified classification proceedings shall be restored.
Provided, however, the Commission may extend such period of time for an additional
period not to exceed two (2) years prior to the termination date of such period
if written application is filed at least thirty (30) days before such termination
setting forth the reasons for requesting such extension, and the Commission finds
S. 9643 A MISCELLANEOUS .DISTRICTS PLANNING
that under the applicable facts such property could not reasonable have been
developed or utilized within such period of time. Immediately after termination,
as provided herein, the property thereafter may only be utilized for those per-
mitted by the prior zoning. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code to �
the contrary, no public hearings need be held nor further notice given as a requi-
site to the termination of the (Q) qualified classification and the restriction of
the property to its previously permitted uses.
The Planning Commission shall initiate General Plan Amendment proceedings, if
necessary, of the property within a reasonable time after such termination as
provided herein.
S. 9644 REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS, In the event that buildings or structures
designed for occupancy by uses which were not permitted prior to the
qualified classification are located on property on which the qualified classifica-
tion is terminated, such buildings or structures shall be completely removed forth-
with by the owner at his own expense, unless their design is altered in full compliance
with all applicable regulations for uses permitted prior to such qualified classifi-
cation.
r
huntington beach development services department
STAf f
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: April 15, 1986
SUBJECT: CODE' AMENDMENT NO. 86-15 (-CD, -CF, -MS, and Q)
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: - To repeal existing Articles 966 , 967, 934, and 934A and
add new Article .946; provisions for the civic district
suffix, community facilities suffix, multi-story suffix
and qualified classification and to retitle Chapter 94 ,
"Miscellaneous Districts and Suffixes. "
1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Approve Code Amendment No . 86-15 and recommend adoption by the City
Council .
2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION.:
Code Amendment No . 86-15 cleans up and consolidates four existing
articles into one . The only substantive change has been the
deletion of archaic language.
The Qualified classification (Q) is the one designation in which
changes have been incorporated . The "Q" classification has been
modified to more clearly reflect the manner in which it is
utilized . These provisions appear on Page 3 of the draft ordinance .
3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL, STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Draft Ordinance
2. Existing Articles 967, 966, 934 , and 964A
WP:JA: kla
(4623d )
ACWX
A-FM-23A
'7 r
DRAFT APRIL 4, 1986
ARTICLE 946
CIVIC DISTRICT SUFFIX (-CD)
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SUFFIX (-CF)
MULTI-STORY SUFFIX ( -MS )
QUALIFIED CLASSIFICATION (Q)
S. 9460 \\GE L PROVISIONS - CIVIC DISTRIC . These provisions
are adopted purs to Government Code Sectio 65850 et seq. and
establish a meth o ` regulate the orderly, harmonious and
attractive develop of facilities surroun ng Community
Facilities District° i order to preserve th character and
integrity of the pu ,i facility.
S. 9460 .1 APPLICATI N. These provisio s shall apply to all
property having the civic district ( -CD) suffix added to the base
zoning district ac'cordin to. the zone c ange procedures of this
code. Prior to issuance f b;uilding p rmits or other required
entitlements, such develop ents shall be approved by the Design
Review Board unless, in the ,� pinion f the Director, the request is
of an insignificant nature . pp.lic tion for design review shall be
pursuant to Article 972.
S. 9460. 2 SUBMITTAL REQUIREME, S. The applicant shall be
require to submit plans as det ` ell in the application instructions
available in the Department of ev �opment Services . Such plans may
include, but not be limited t , a c\MUN ,
e site plan, floor plan,
building elevations , landsca ing plreliminary grading plans ,
and proposed signage S. 9461 GENERAL PROV SIGNS - CTY FACILITIES. These
provisions are adopted order to facili• to the development of
property surrounding p licly-owned facili es used by the city or
other agency for educ tion, recreation, hea h, safety, government
or other purposes
h
S. 9461 .1 APPL ATIGN, The ariou communi facilities suffix
-CF symbols sh e placed on property used or public purposes
in order to des ' gnate its use on the sectional d"Istrict maps . Such
symbol shall b placed on the property by the Dirk ctor and shall not
require publi hearing.
S mbo
CF- Civic uses such as the civic center, pol\ ce facilities ,
fire stations , maintenance yards , parking areas or
other uses .
i
F-E Educational institutions
CF-R Parks and other recreational areas
CF-H Hospitals
`ox_(t wo&A- hi®.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY WINCH ILL, SE OND BY ROWE, TO ADOPT BY
RESOLUTION THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY LAN AND NORTH HUNTINGTON CENTER
SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE FOLL WING V TE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchel Live good, Porter, Erskine, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Schumacher
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
C-13 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86 14
The proposed amendment to Prticle 913 cleans up provisions related
to setbacks by merely re-w iting hem in chart form. The content
change involves the application o the article to larger apartment
complex developments . ThiE subje t has never been addressed in the
Oldtown/Townlot areas , but in an
cipation of future development
requests, staff is requesting mod fication at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is cdegQur! ally exempt from the provisions of
'�tthe California Environmen ity Act.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPE ED
There was no one present t spea for or against the project and the
public hearing was closed .
i
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MIRJ ANGIR SECOND BY WINCHELL, TO APPROVE
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-14, ITH ENDMENTS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Liveng od, Er kine, Porter, Mirjahangir
NOES: Winchell
ABSENT: Schumache
. one
MOTION PASSEDIJJ
- r-
C-14 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15 �_
= lJ
Code Amendment No. 86-15 cleans up and consolidates four existing
articles into one. The only substantive change has been the
deletion of archaic language.
The Qualified classification (Q) is the one designation in which
changes have been incorporated . The "Q" classification has been
modified to more clearly reflect the manner in which it is utilized.
PC Minutes - 4/15/86 -16- (4761d )
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
1 The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
There was no one present to speak for or against the project and the
public hearing was closed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY ERSKINE, TO APPROVE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-15, WITH MODIFICATIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Livengood, Porter, Erskine, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Schumacher
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
C-15 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-16
Code Amendment No. 86-1E proposes to; onsolidate provisions for
horse stables, update the language, a d reorganize the article. The
current operators of horse stables ha e been provided a copy of the
ordinance for review, aE has a local orse club.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality ct .
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ER KINE, SECOND Y WINCHELL, TO CONTINUE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-16 TO THE MAY 6, 198 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winch 11 , Livengoo Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Schumacher
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
D. ITEMS (NOT FOR PUBLIC EARING)
D-1 SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 86-3
Applicant: Ursino Develo ment Corp.
Request : Construction of a single fami y dwelling in Downtown
Specific Plan area (121 1 th. Street)
PC Minutes - 4/15/86 -17- (4761d)
Publish May 7, 1986
NOTICE Or PUBLIC HEARING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15
MISCELLANEOUS DISTRICTS AND SUFFIXES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE: Monday, May 19, 1986
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
.APPLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment 86-15
LOCATION: City-wide
PROPOSAL: To repeal existing Articles 966, 967, 934, 964A of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code and add new Article 946 related to provisions for
the civic district suffix, community facilities overlay, multi-story
suffix and qualified classification and to retitle Chapter 94,
"Miscellaneous Districts and Suffixes."
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of
Development Services.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405
Dated: May 5, 1986 �` '
_ is -
Publish April 23, 1986
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15
(MISCELLANEOUS SUFFIXES)
NCTICE IS HEREBY GITrzN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Wain Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persocs who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. 4
Q
DATE: Monday, May 5, 1936
TIME: 7:30 P. M.
.k?PLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment No. 86-15
LOCATION: City-wide
PROPOSAL: To repeal existing Articles 966, 967 , 934, 9A4A of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code and add new Article 946 related to provisions for the civic
district suffix, community facilities overlay,multi-story suffix and
qualified classification and to retitle Chapter 94, "Miscellaneous Districts
and Suffixes."
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development
Services.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said gearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405
Dated: April 21 , 1986
`Authorized to Publish Advertisements or ed kinds including public
notices by Decree of the Superior Court'of Orange County,
California. Number A-6214, dated 29 September. 1961. and r\`
A-24831. dated 11 June. 1963.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange PuDl,t r+ohce •dvenutnI «cowed
Dy this OHldeYlt Is set In
7 point
+nth to pica cotumn width r
PUBLIC NOTICE
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen CODE AMENDMENT
NO.W15
:years, and not a party to Or interested in the below (MISCELLANEOUS
SUFFIXES)
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that the Huntington
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the Beach City Council will hold
a public hearing In the Coun-
cilNEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, iingtonamber Beach Civic cat the enter,
Hunt-
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, 200o Main street, Hunt-j
p p Y Ington Beach,California,on
In-
County of Orange, State of California, and that a the date and at the time I and
dicated below to receive and �
PUBLIC HEARING consider the statements of
Notice of all persons who wish to be
heard relative to the appal-
callon described below.
DATE: Monday, May 5,
I 1986 J
-TME:7:30 P.M. I,d
Of which Copy attached hereto is a true and Complete APPLICATION NUMBER:
Code Amendment No.86-15
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, LOCATION:Citywide
PROPOSAL:To repeal ex= t
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Isting Articles 966,967,934; ,IMF
r 934A/of the Huntington r
Irvine, the South' Coast communities and Laguna Beach Ordinance Code and .
add new Article 946 related t`t ti i its
Beach issues of said newspaper for 9 time. to provisions for the civic `,
district suffix,community fa- €Y
,clllties overiay,' muitl-story I. j
consecutive weeks to wit the issue(s) of suffix and qualified classk
,ficatlori and to retitle t
Chapter 94, "Miscellaneous l e G
Districts and Suffixes."
' ENVIRONMENTAL },
STATUS: Categorically ex-
Ap 1 93 198 6 empt from the provisions of
the California Environmental
Quality Act r,
ON FILE: A copy of the n�
198 proposed ordinance Is ion j
file In the Department of De-
velopment Services.
ALL INTERESTED PER- ,r
198 SONS are Invited to attend rttJ/�
sold hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence
for or against the application
198 as outlined above.All appli-
cations, exhibits, and de-
scriptions of this proposal
are on file with the OfRoe of
19f3 the City Clerk, 2000 Main i
Street, Huntington Beach,
California,for Inspection by
the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH
CITY COUNCIL, By: Alicia
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the M. Wentworth, City Clerk,
Phone(714)536-5405
foregoing is true and correct. Dated:April 21,1986 .
Published Orange Coast
Dolly Pilot April 23,1986
W-403
Executed on April 24 , 198 6
at Costa Mesa, California.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Publish April 23, 1986
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15
(MISCELLANEOUS SUFFIXES)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a
public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE: Monday, May 5, 1986
TIME: 7:30 P. M.
APPLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment No. 86-15
LOCATION: City-wide
PROPOSAL: To repeal existing Articles 966, 90, 934, 914A of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code and add new Article 946 related to provisions for the civic
district suffix, community facilities overlay,multi-story suffix and
qualified classification and to retitle Chapter 94, "Miscellaneous Districts
and Suffixes."
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically, exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of Development
Services.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405
Dated: April 21 , 1986 `
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-15
(Miscellaneous Suffixes )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission
will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington
Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , California,
on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider
the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: 7 : 0 0 PM gC/
APPLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment No . 86-15 V
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach q6 7 qjy `1 q,4
REQUEST: To,add new Article 946 related to provisions for the
civic district suffix, community facilities srx ,
multi-story suffix and qualified classification and to
retitle Chapter 94 , "Miscellaneous Districts and
Suffixes . "
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file, in the
Department of Development Services , 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the
public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Jeff Abramowitz , Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
James W. Palin , Secretary
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
( 4573d-8)
V �
M1