HomeMy WebLinkAboutCode Amendment 86-27 - Council DENIED Proposed Ordinance 288 !Sol all pubilc to
j
__;pertor Court cl Cirange County..
,r4tfOW5 elated 29 Se,-16-bef, 1961. and
A-2 4 8 3 t o d i 1 June. 363 L) c.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange P.b1K N01-C4 Aovwmno cowed
oy INS al"Clawt Is W In 7 Point
with 10 pica column vAdth
I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid-, I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or interested in the below
entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange
PUBLIC NOTICE
Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of .general circulation, CODE-AMENDMENT
NO.86-27
i�rinted and published in the City of Costa Mesa, (Second Units
County of Orange. State of California, and that a 4Within District"R1
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY
Notice of GIVEN that the Huntington
I Beach City Council will hold
Ja public hearing in the Coun-
cil Chamber at the HunY
ington Beach Civic Center,'
2000 Main Street, Hunt-
of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete I
lington Beach,California,on
the date and at the time in-
copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, dicated below to receive and
�consider the statements of
Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, all persons who wish to be
heard relative to the appli-
{r,,Jne, the South Coast communities and Laguna cation described below.
DATE: Monday, Novem-
6,.e.acn issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME ber 17, 1986
TIME:7:30 P.M.
X,xr}!;XmXK,ffXZeRMtO wit the issue(s) of SUBJECT: Code Amend-
ment No.86-27
APPLICANT:City of Hunt-
ington Beach
LOCATION:City-wide
PROPOSAL: To amend
Nov-ember 6 6 Section,9110.3 of the Hunt-
198— ington Beach Ordinance
Code related to provisions
for adding a second unit
(granny unit)to a single fam-
198— ily home. The specific
change is to require that the
primary access to the sec-
ond unit be through the main
198— dwelling's entrance.
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS:The proposed pro-
ject is categorically exempt
198— from the provisions of the
California 'Environmental
Quality Act.
ON-FILE: A copy of the
198— proposed ordinance is on
(file in the Development Ser-
vices Department.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
SONS are invited to attend
I der-fare, under penalty of perjury, that the opinions or s said hearing and expressubmit evidence
III
foregoing is true and correct. .for or against the application
above.as outlined All appli-
cations, exhibits, and de-
scriptions of this proposal�
Noveriber 6 6 are on file with the office of I
Executed on 198 — the City Clerk, 2000 Main,
Street, Huntington Beach,
Cosa Mesa, C,a 1if rn a California, for inspection by
(�
the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH,
CITY COUNCIL; By: Alicia
I' M. Wentwotith, City Clerk,
Slignature Phone:(714)536-,6405
Published Orange Coast
Daily Pilot November b,
1986 T6225
;alp
IC&PROOF F P/SL
REQUEb f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date November 17, 1986
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administra o
{ m
Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services
Subject: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-27, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE H
SECOND UNIT ADDITIONS TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [A New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Code Amendment No. 86-27 is being processed as a result of Planning
Commission direction on June 3, 1986. At that meeting, staff
presented several issues of concern and identified changes that
could be made in the code for second unit additions in R1
neighborhoods . Staff was directed to incorporate one item in a code
amendment, that of prohibiting the separate exterior entrance to the
second unit .
After discussion, the Planning Commission changed the recommendation
to allow secondary exits in order to comply with fire codes for ,
emergency exit requirements .
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission and staff recommends approval of Code Amendment
No. 86-27.
Planning Commission action on October 21 , 1986 :
ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY WINCHELL, THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVED CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-27 AND RECOMMENDED ADOPTION BY THE
CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell, Porter, Mirjahangir
NOES : Livengood, Pierce
ABSENT: Erskine
ABSTAN: None
ANALYSIS:
The content change the Planning Commision directed staff to include
relates to outside entrance doors. The current code requirement
states that the entrance to the second unit shall not be visible
from the street in front of the residence. The proposed change
would require that the primary access to the second unit be from
inside of the main dwelling itself, but that secondary access be
provided as required by the Fire Department . 00V;�%D
PIO 4/84
The intent is to make it easier for the house to be integrated in
the future should another owner wish to incorporate the square
footage for use as part of the main house. Also, it is to make it
clearer that the code is intended to provide an opportunity for
relatives to share a home with some degree of privacy separation ,
rather than to provide for a second unit as a separate rental
apartment .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS :
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
FUNDING SOURCE:
Not applicable .
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Modify ordinance as desired .
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance
2. Planning Commission staff report and minutes dated October 21,
1986
JWP :JA: kla
RCA - 11/17/86 -2- ' ( 6580d )
ti
ORDINANCE NO. .
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9110 . 3 A MAXIMUM
DENSITY/INTENSITY
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain
as follows :
SECTION 1 . The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby
amended by amending Section 9110. 3, to read as follows :
9110. 3 MAXIMUM DENSITY/INTENSITY. The maximum density ,
shall not exceed one (1) dwelling unit per lot.
Exception: A second unit may be added to an existing single
family residence upon approval of a conditional use permit subject
to the following standards:
(a ) The applicant shall be an owner occupant .
(b) The minimum lot size shall be six thousand ( 6, 000 )
square feet .
(c ) The second unit shall be attached to the main dwelling
in such a manner as to create an architecturally unified whole,
not resulting in any change to the visible character of the
street . Primary access ¢�1)L� �1¢¢ to the second unit shall ¢¢Y
be through
the main dwellings 's entrance, although secondary access shall be
provided as required by the Fire Department.
(d) The maximum square footage of the second unit shall be
six hundred fifty ( 650 ) square feet nor shall it exceed one (1 )
bedroom.
(e) The second unit shall not be sold separately from the
main dwelling.
(f ) Four ( 4) total on-site parking spaces (nine ( 9 ) feet by
nineteen (19 ) feet in size) shall be provided, two ( 2 ) of which
may be unenclosed, uncovered and arranged in tandem with the
existing spaces . Unenclosed spaces shall be located on the
driveway apron or on a paved area between the driveway and the
nearest side property line. Recreational vehicle storage shall
not be permitted within any required parking space.
(g) The second unit shall comply with all applicable land
use regulations of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code except as
specified herein.
(h ) The park and recreation fee shall be assessed at
twenty-five ( 25% ) percent of the fee for a single family residence
as set by resolution of the City Council .
( i ) No separate utility meters shall be permitted for the
second unit .
( j ) The following safety and conservation measures for the
new unit shall be implemented:
1 . Insulation of accessible attic areas to R-19 .
2. Weatherstripping of doors and windows .
3. Installation of low flow showerheads and faucets
certified by the California Energy Commission.
4 . Installation of approved smoke detectors.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on day
of , 1986
Mayor
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED: NITIATED AND APPROVED:
too
Cz Adminis a or zrector of Development Services
1704L
11-6-86
(12 ) The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke the
approval of a child carl facility if a violation of the
conditions of approval cccOrs. All revocation proceedings
shall be preceded by a ru,b.lic hearing.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENG00 , SECOND BY PIERCE, TO APPROVE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-30, AS AMEND D, AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY
COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOT :
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Por er, Livengood, Pierce, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Erskine
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
�C-4�LCO�DEMENDMENT�NO- 86-•27
APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
This item was continued from the meeting of September 16, 1986, with
direction to staff to modify the ordinance to allow for secondary
entrances into the units in order to comply with fire codes for
emergency exit requirements.
Code Amendment No. 86-27 is being processed as a result of Planning
Commission direction on June 3, 1986. At that meeting, staff
presented several issues of concern and identified changes that
could be made in the code for second unit additions . Staff was
directed to incorporate one item in a code amendment, that of
prohibiting the separate exterior entrance to the second unit .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
There was no one present to speak for or against the code amendment
and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Pierce expressed his opposition to the code amendment .
He feels that the current code preserves the integrity of the
neighborhood by restricting the"..,"Visibility of a second entrance from
the street, and feels that second entrances can be socially ,
beneficial .
Commissioner Livengood supported the intent of the code amendment
however felt that the amendment still left too many loopholes .
PC Minutes - 10/21/86 -11- (6522d )
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY WINCHELL, TO APPROV CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-27 AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY CO CIL, BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Porter , Mirjahangir
NOES: Livengood, Pierce
ABSENT: Erskine
ABSTAIn : None
MOTION PASSED
C-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 86-50/COAST L DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. - NEGATIVE DECLAR TI N
APPLICANT: SUMMERHILL DE ELOPMENT CO. AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Conditional Use Permit No. 86-50 Coast 1 Development Permit No.
86-30/Negative Declaration No. 8 -51 is a conceptual development
plan for a 161 unit planned resi ent al development. The proposed
project lies in the Oldtown Spec fi Plan District 2 and Downtown
Specific Plan District 6. The t zones are a result of the
adoption of Precise Plan of Stre_ Alignment No. 84-2 .which
established a new street config ation of Atlanta/Lake/Orange. The
Oldtown Specific Plan portion 1 contain the residential
structures and parking while e Downtown Specific Plan portion will
be used as the main recreati nal rea for the project.
Since the project is divid d into two zoning classifications , staff
analyzed the project by u ing a p o-rata density allowed for each
zone.
Tentative Tract No. 12 68 was app oved on appeal by the City Council
on August 6, 1985, an is valid u til August 6, . 1987. " No further
action is required a this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL STAT S:
Pursuant to the vironmental reg lations in effect at this time,
the Department f Development Ser ices posted draft Negative
Declaration No. 86-51 for ten day , and no comments , either verbal
or written ha v been received . • T e staff, in its initial study of
the project , as recommended that a negative declaration be issued
Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 86-50 and Coastal
Development Permit No. 86-30, it is necessary for the Planning
Commission to review and act on . N gative Declaration No . 86-30.
COASTAL TATUS:
/allt
ect site is an area designated as "non appealable" which is
area of the coastal zone, ying inland from the appeal
tion.
es - 10/21/86 -1 - (6522d )
1
(12 ) The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke the
approval of a child care facility if a violation of the
conditions of approval occurs. All revocation proceedings
shall be preceded by a public hearing.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY PIERCE, TO APPROVE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-30, AS AMENDED, : AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY
COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Porter, Livengood, Pierce, Mirjahangir
NOES: None
ABSENT: Erskine
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
C-4 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-27
APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
This item was continued from the meeting of September 16, 1986, with
direction to staff to modify the ordinance to allow for secondary
entrances into the units in order to comply with fire codes for
emergency exit requirements.
Code Amendment No. 86-27 � is being processed as a result of Planning
Commission direction on June 3., J986. At that meeting, staff
presented several issues of concern and identified changes that
could be made in the code for second unit additions . Staff was
directed to incorporate one item in a code amendment, that of
prohibiting the separate exterior entrance to the second unit .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
There was no one present to speak for or against the code amendment
and the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Pierce expressed his opposition to the code amendment .
He feels that the current code preserves the integrity of the
neighborhood by restricting the" visibility of a second entrance from
the street, and feels that second entrances can be socially
beneficial .
Commissioner Livengood supported the intent of the code amendment
however felt that the amendment still left too many loopholes .
PC Minutes - 10/21/86 -11- (6522d )
A MOTION WAS MADE BY PORTER, SECOND BY. WINCHELL, TO APPROVE CODE
AMENDMENT NO. 86-27 AND RECOMMEND ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY
THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Porter , Mirjahangir
NOES: Livengood, . Pierce
ABSENT: Erskine
ABSTAIn : None
MOTION PASSED
C-5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10. 86-50/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
NO. 86-TUTNEGATIVE DECLARATION N -
APPLICANT: SUMMERHILL DEVELOPMENT CO. AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Conditional Use Permit No. 86 50/Coastal Development 'Permit No.
86-30/Negative Declaration No 86-51 is a conceptual development
plan for a 161 unit planned residential development. The proposed
project lies in the Oldtown S ecific Plan District 2 and Downtown
Specific Plan District 6. Th two zones are a result of the
adoption of Precise Plan of S1he
reet Alignment No. 84-2 which
established a new street confguration of Atlanta/Lake/Orange. The
Oldtown Specific Plan portionwill contain the residential
structures and parking while Downtown Specific Plan portion will
be used as the main recreatio al area for the project.
Since the project is divided jntiO two zoning classifications, staff
analyzed the project by using a pro-rata density allowed for each
zone.
Tentative Tract No. 12268 was approved on appeal by the City Council
on August 6, 1985, and is valid until August 6, 1987. No further
action is required at this tire.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,
the Department of Development Services posted draft Negative
Declaration No. 86-51 for ten days, and no comments, either verbal
or written have been received . , The staff, in its initial study of
the project , has recommended that a negative declaration be issued
Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 86-50 and Coastal
Development Permit No. 86-30, it is necessary for the Planning
Commission to review and act o Negative Declaration No. 86-30.
COASTAL STATUS:
The subject site is an area de ignated as "non appealable" which is
all the area of the coastal zone, lying inland from the appeal
jurisdiction .
PC Minutes - 10/21/86 -12- (6522d )
huntington beach development services department
STAf f
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Development Services
DATE: October 21 , 1986
SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-27
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: To amend Section 9110 .3 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code related to provisions for second unit
additions to single family homes .
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Approve Code Amendment No . 86-27 and recommend adoption by the City
Council .
2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
This item was continued from the meeting of September 16, 1986, with
direction to staff to modify the ordinance to allow for secondary
entrances into the units in order to comply with fire codes for
emergency exit requirements .
Code Amendment No . 86-27 is being processed as a result of Planning
Commission direction on June 3, 1986 . At that meeting, staff
presented several issues of concern and identified changes that
could be made in the code for second unit additions . Staff was
directed to incorporate one item in a code amendment, that ' of
prohibiting the separate exterior entrance to the second unit .
3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
4 .0 CONTENT CHANGE:
The current code requirement related to the outside entrance doors
for second unit additions states that, "the entrance to the second
unit shall not be visible from the street in front of the residence . "
The proposed change would require that the primary access to the
second unit be from the inside of the main dwelling itself but that
secondary access be provided as required by the Fire Department .
Atftk
A-FM-23A
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Draft Ordinance
2. Exerpt from current code, Section 9110. 3
3 . Planning Commission staff report dated June 3, 1986
JPW:JA: kla
Staff Report - 10/21/86 -2 (6012d)
Publi 11/6/86
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-27
(Second Units Within R1 Districts)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold
a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic
Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and
at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all
persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE: Monday, November 17, 1986
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
SUBJECT: Code Amendment No. 86-27
APPLIC&NT: City of Huntington Beach
LOCATION: City-wide
PROPOSAL: To amend Section 9110. 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
related to provisions for adding a second unit (granny unit)
to a single family home. The specific change is to require
that the primary access to the second unit be through the
main dwelling' s entrance.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : The proposed project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the Department of
Development Services.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit evidence Eor or against the application as outlined
above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are
on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California, for inspection by the public.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL
By: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
Phone (714) 536-5405 ' -
Dated October sl , 1986
t
1'
orac 0 , poezz�e
;I CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86 y'27 �� x
x 55 t
(Second Units Within R1 Districts)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission
Will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington
Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California,
on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider
the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME• Wednesday, Segts"mber 3, 1 86, 7: 0 0 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Code Amendment No. 86-27
APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach
REQUEST: To amend Section 9110.3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code related to provisions for adding a second unit
(granny unit ) to a single family home. The specific
change is to require that access to the second unit be
ut
main t � entrance. � 'e through the
ENVIRONMENTAL S ATUS: (1 The proposed prro}ect"is
categorically
from the provisions of the California exempt
Environmental Quality Act.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the
Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the
public.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as Outlined above. If there are any further
Jeff Abramowitz, Assistant Planner at 536-527questions please call
James W. Palin, Secretary
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
(5960d-3)
have r row
�s�nta :_,Please Print Your Name '- ---- ""lnciud ��
"* +�ntbor;Zed filing requirements on the reverse side of this application. I am the
agent of the subjectproperty.
_.
J ro ert I hereby affirm under penalty of ,
p p - Y• Y P Y
i
0
NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM CDe& 4oA# y �Uu . 86 " 3v (414�r �)
66
T0: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE � + � q DTE:°X
FROM: R l�! 3�g(0
PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE
DAY OF 1986
AP's are attached
AP's will follow
' s
Initiated by:
Planning Commission
Planning Department
Petition
* Appeal
Other
Adoption of Environmental Status (x)
EIR ND NONE
Has City Attorney's Office been YES NO
informed of forthcoming public
hearing?
Refer to � f�-�Q,,�, -f,� Planning Department - ExtensionbZ1�
for additional information.
* If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal .
IS THIS AN APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ? RSA /
YES NO
0.4
Cam, -
Huntington Reach
03 Moi,on 4,, aphro v A®Lltaln Valley -4-01 �'cKe oc y�,d RM 6(AIIisdle►
kRoar Of REALTORS® ync• F1Kt*y, C3alltyr Tkvyw —Ma )
R E A LTO R i1K VAY Jd Arwy
8101 Slater Avenue • Huntington Beach, CA 92647 • (714) 847-6093 �W XG —� �
7 h
� �®o.0,0 ��A1 p
November 14, 1986 D
NOV 1 71986
Robert P. Mandic, Jr. , Mayor CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
and Members of the City Council CITY COUNCIL OFFICE
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: Agenda Item D-2B, Code Amendment 86-27, Amending Section 9110.3 Related
to Provisions for Second Unit Additions Single Family Homes
Honorable Commissioners:
On behalf of the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Board of REALTORS, I wish to
oppose the amendment proposed by staff to require that access for residential
second units only be permitted from inside the main dwelling unit.
We feel that the Ordinance Code as it currently stands which provides that
"entrance to the second unit shall not be visible from the street" adequately
preserves the integrity of the neighborhood without unduly infringing upon the
living conditions of the property owners.
There is no justification for the elimination of a private entrance if that is the
desire of the property owners. This is an unnecessary intrusion into private
citizen's lifestyles, which in our view, is totally outside the purview of respon-
sible and responsive city government.
In addition, we believe that the proposed change is not consistent with the
authorizing legislation in that S.B. 1534 (Mello) Sec. 2, Section 65852.2 (d)
defines a second unit as "either a detached or attached dwelling unit which
provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons. It
shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and
sanitation. . ."
We submit that a residential second unit whose primary entrance is required
to be through the main dwelling unit does not qualify as an independent unit
and that arrangements for access to the second unit through someone else's
home can not be considered to provide permanent provisions for living. In fact,
OFFICERS
R.L. "KIRK" KIRKLAND, President • LILA NOWELL, First Vice President
JAN SHOMAKER, Second Vice President/MLS Chairman • BETH DUNCOMBE, Secretary/Treasurer
DIRECTORS
KENT M. PIERCE o LARRY GAGE• MAGGIE SHAFFER • JIM RIGHEIMER• FRANK C. HORZEWSKI
WILL WOODS, Executive Vice President 9 JUD TH SEVERY, Vice President/Public Affairs
Huntington Beach City Council, Agenda Item D-213
November 14, 1986
Page 2
a living facility without its own primary entrance can hardly be described as
"complete."
We strongly urge that you deny this Code Amendment which is an infringement
upon the private property rights of Huntington Beach residents.
Sincerely,
R.L. "Kirk" Kirkland
Board President
RLK/JAS/km