Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Downtown Specific Plan - Revisions - Code Amendment 88-3 - O (13)
LEGEND i ristrict # i- Visitor-Serving Commercial District 12- Residential ` District 43- visitor-Servinq C—wwrcial District 04- Mixed Use; Office/Residential District IS- Mixed Use; Commercial/office/Residential District 84- mixed Use ; Commwercial/Office/Residential District 17- Visitor-Serving Commercial District 02- High Density Residential District 14- Comwrcial /Recreation District 010- Pier -Related Commercial District 011- beach Open Space L L UlrDL .� 0 000E] DE11]0 0 000 D 000000000 11 0 0 0000 00 00 0000D El 01100001111110E] 11 I PDX c� a�xOWN CALFOa►. Besting Specific Plan Zoning Dts sr►� arm LEGEND District H- Visitor-Serving Commeicial District 12- Residential District #3- Visitor-Serving Connercial District 94- Residential District 05- Mixed Ilse; Cowmercial/Office/Residential District 16- Plixed Use; Camanercial/Office/Residential District 17- Vis{tar--Serer' s=,ri Comsercial District i8- Righ Density iesidential . District 19- Corpercial/Recreation District 110- Pier-Related Cotmercial District 111- Beach Open Space C�D GGGGGG � : G Q�GGGGGG Q D G00000000011111111 40 aGGGGGGGGGGGGG � ,`� 2 2 2 UL T t a I cwLFoR*, Proposed Specifc Plan Zoning D13tric#s s � � Dw R ArrftemAE#r ESNeetington luck PluelMN Csomisslem r.o. awx In cs►LiForrssu► sass TO: City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: April 14, 19U SUBJECT: Irt WRI TY REPORT REGARMG PROPOSED REVWGW* TO DISTRICTS M1i7M THE D t SPECIFIC PLAN At the March 15, 1998 Planning Commission meeting, proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Pia-9, District 5 were rested by a vote of 5 -- 2. After the vote. Cemmissioner Higgins requested that a minority report :vgarding the action be prtpared identifying the proposed revisions that were presented at the February 23, 19U Joint Study Session with the City Council and the Planning Commission by Commissioner Higgins. The objective of the revisions recommended by Commissioner Higgira is to cepam;e commercial and residential. The following is a summary of the .•eviskmw which were presented by Commissioner Higgins: commercial wasld be allowed only on both sides of Main Street; the east stile of Fifth Street and *resit side of Third Street smut if those 1/1 blocks arie consolidated. The balance of District S would be residential including the separate area aWS Lake Street. The suggested revis km are similar to the 3DA plan which is attached. rank Higgi Planning Commissioner FH:R LF:gbrn Attachment: 1. 313/1 Proposed Land Uses i I_ 1 _ •'•iv '� � +�it M •• civio OIL ♦ 1 'Jor Iwo at FA A rig — • 6 .W Joe �_ .•• w•� r � � - �.�i;• .• is Ftopvmcd Land Uses' .I` ti w ni i�� TTAe'NA� A�7' 1kr -2 Q:a C] jicE 90. 17-17ZvsE PER IT 1 8 7.resLr. Erg?IN-- ;IEr 8hTION MO 87_50 (C9NTI MQ gRQK FE8_.R 11Y 12, 19Q$ PLARINal cor�I55toX-MEETING) A" ICANT: KERNVIE'+f OIL CORPORATION Zone Change 87-17 is a request to place an "01 " suffix on 15 , 000 square fo portion of a 40 acre parcel of land pre tly used for oil prod u-' on and agriculture . Use Permit No . -84 is a request to drill one w well on the lCJ foot by 150 f site . The applicant has requeste that ZoGa Change No . -17, Use Permit Na . 87-84 and Negative Decla tion No , 87-50 be ontinued to the An _ i , 19 . 1988 Planning Corrnis ' on meeting to llow time for the au:)licant to complete certain to ical ma rs . Continue Zone Change No . 87-17, ?1<91 Perm No . 87-84 and Negative DeclaraLion No . 87-51 to the A 19 Planning Commission meeting Per the applicant ' s nest . A MOTION WAS MADE BY LT . GOOD, SECOND BY PIERC TO CONTINUE ZONE CHANGE NO . 87-17 , USE R.MIT NO . 87-84 AND NEOATI DECLARATION NO. 87-50 TO THE APR*L 1918 PLANNING COMMISSION MEE NG, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: • Pi ce , Livengoad , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , Higg . s , urguignon ::OES : None �1BSIF Norm �.5.; N : gone K I�l��►S.�E C-3 s0DI .arIWEX IT NQ. _ 4 8-3 APPLICANT : CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Code Amendment No . 88-3 is a request for revs:ions to expand residential uses in Districts 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts in order to create a more concise document . Districts of the Downtown Specific Plan are in the downtown area generally located along Pacific Coast Highway between Golderwest Street and beach Boulevard. 01SMIRONa-ITAL STATUS : Code A"adment No. 08-3 is categorically •tempt pursuant to $,action 19300 . 4 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act , 1966 . PC minutes - 3/1S/88 (0264d) I DRAFT COASTAI, STA I'iL8: The Downtown Specific Plan is the implementing ordinance of the Coastal Element and the proposed revisions are consistent with the Local Coastal Program contained in the Coastal Element which was certified by the Coastal Commission in March 1985 . R-EDMURMENT. STATUS : The Downtown Specific Plan contains the zoning and development standards for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area which was adopted by the City Council in 1982 . The goals of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area are to provide affordable housing opportunities , to preserve historically significant buildings while eliminating blighting influences , the elimination of seismic deficiencies, dnd to improve and espard visitor-serving commercial facilities . MEE RECO=KDATICH: Approve Code Amendment No . 88-3 with findings and recommend adoption by the City Council . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Barbara Milkovich, member of the Historic Resources Snard, spoke in support of a cultural center in either District 5 or 6 . She stated that she would like to see a museum ( i .e . a working oil well , sugar :;Let , first boat used by lifeguards , surfing history, etc . ) located in one of these districts . She also voiced concern regarding the historic structures in the downtov; area and said that she would like to see restored property styled architecturally to reflect the history of Huntington Beach . Guy Guzsardo , 515 Walnut Avenue, member of the Historic Resources Hoard, stated that there is an urgent need not recognized in the Dowrtcwn Specific Plan and that being the preservation of historic structures . Ha would like to see the Downtown Specific Plan revised to include a requirement for Historic Board review bf-fore demolishing any historical sites . He was asked by one of the Commissioaers how many significant historical sites th•are were on Main Street . He stated that there were perhaps 10 to 15 sites . Doug Langevin, 8196 Pawtucket Drive, addressed hi.i concerns with the closing of Fifth Street . He said that the closure would create a negative impact on residential areas ( i .e . re-routing busest traffic, etc . ) . k , expressed concern with the elimination of residential on the second story levers in the commercial areas. He said that there was a study drae recently that concluded that second stOt7 office/comere—ial was nvt successful . He also staged a PAC Minutes w 3/15/ad (0264d) DRAFT concern with the requiraments imposod by the City, to downtown property owners t*,sat wished to upgrade their buildings . No said that the requirements cost the property owners more %-han their properties were worth and tell: that this was unfair . Loretta Wolfe, 411 6th. Street , stated her objections to the closing of fifth Street . She said that major bus routes would then be diverted to her neighborhood causing more traffic and creating a parking and safety hazard . :he also stated that because of the closure she feels that the City ' s historical sites will be jeapordized . Richard Harlow, 111 loth. Street , stated that he feels this phase of development is responsive to the community and market feasibility. He feels that mixed use in District 5 will strengthen the commercial on Main Street . He also stated that he feels the requirement for all on-site parking will eliminate possible shopping at more than one establishment and would like to see the requirement eliminated . Pob Mandic , 1112 Main Street , expressed his opposition to the I' closing of Lake Street and stated that he felt that street closures should not be permitted , especially on fifth or Sixth Street . He 4aid that the circulation system is supposed to be a loop and that Sixth Street is presently too narrow . fie further stated that the Downtown Specific Plan was originally based on premises that no longer exist and feels that if corunercial development is reduced in the downtown area that residential should also be reduced . He st-ggested that a long-term financial study be initiated . James Smith , 201 12th. Street , stated that he is opposed to green belts Leing given away on hacifi , Coast Highway and to on-site parking bein,3 locked up . Thera were no other persons present to speak for or against the code amendment and the public heading was closed . Straw votes were taken on proposed revisions in each disW ct of the Specific Plan. They tre as follows : p$,Qp.QSED REVISIONS QN 3 . 9.1 (a ) Change District 4 from Mired Use (Office/Remiduntial/ Commercial) to 100 percent Residential . (b) Delete the commerciel anchor concept in District 6 . (c) Emphasise cultural/social nods in District S or District 6 depetsding sin scale. (d) The Historical Resources Hoard shall provide design recommndations for structures eon,,%idered to be historically significant . PC Minutes - 3/15/86 (0264d) DRA A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE SY LIVEHGOOD, SECOND BY DOURCVIGNON, TO ACCEPT REVISIONS (a) THROUGH %d) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins, Bourgui.gnon • NOr..$. Pierce STPM V4T _MMION MOM- R802QSEQ ,_$EVISIQNS TQ_DEMFLQPMEyT STAN.QA,$QS._._� (SEQTION ...0)__ UFTNITIO. 5 (Section-- 4 - 0 -91) ( a) Introduce sis ( 6 ) definitions : 1 . Common open space 2 . Gross site area s . Hotel 4 . Net site area 5 . Private open space 6 . Suits Hotel A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA TO APPROVE THE SIX Ned DEF'INITIObS , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYZ'S : Livengood , Silva , Lelpzfg , Ort-:ga , Higgins , Bourguignon NOES : Pierce STRAM -VQTE MQ Q11-2A5= PROPOSED REVISIOryS XQ DEXELQ2MEMT IMMEDS iSEL__" 10JJ 4 - Q) - !Z11 TRAT I QM Swll'act f g a 4-.11 ( a) Delete reference to Board of Zoning Adjustments . (b) Require Design Review Board review prior to processing additicaal entitlements . (c) All new construction and establishment of uses shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit . (d) Allow Special Permits in order to comply with State and Federal law. A STRAW VOTE MJTIOM WAS MME Of LIVEHGOOD, SECOND dY LEIPE 1G, TO i APPROVE PROPOSED REVISIONS (a) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOWING Y'M: AYES: pierce, Livengood. Silva , Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins . s�urquignon NOES: None VC Minutol i VIS 14 (0264d) DRAFT PROPOSXD MYSIO3S DEVELOP N'T STUDA DD,S .- (SECTI0:7 ,3,it - GENEUL .PROVISIONS (Section 4 . 21 ( a) Restructure non-conforming requirements . (b) Require minimum ten ( 10) foot setback for st!lterranean and semi-subterranean parking structured . ( c ) Delete specific setbacks from driveways and parking lots . ( d ) Require twenty (20) foot minimum dimension fcr common open space. ; e) Parking for commercial Bevel pments shall be required to provide fifty (50) percent of total required parking spaces on-site and the balance withir, a reasonable walking distance of five hundred ( 5C0 ) feet . Hotels shall provide one :hundred ( 1.00) percent parking on-site . ( f ) Require height cf subterranean and Aemi-subterranean parking structures to be measured from highest street eInvation (consistent with building height measurement; ) . ( q) Change on-site box sixes for trees to match industry sixes . (h) Delete references to section numbers in Division 9 of th3 j Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . ( i ) Maintain view corridors at vacated streets in District 2 and District 3 between Walnut Avenue and. Pacific Coast Highway. A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIJENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG , TO APPROVE RE'✓I S IONS (a) THROUGH ( i ) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Pierce , Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega, Higgins NOES: Bourauignon (a) Change all wording ( 'may' to 'shall' ) . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG* TO APPROVE RIN1STOl1 (a) : BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYLPS: Livengood, Silva, Leipsig , Ortega , Higgins , Bourguignon NOES: pietce 12'rZ MIQl1 P,d,Itsyn PC Minutes - 3/15/90 DRA PRONSE& AXYI S ORS Z4 DIATRLCT-z ( a) Si� -.gLa family residential dwellings which comply with development standards shall be approved by Da3igr. Review Poard . ( a) Require twenty-Five ( 25) foot front setbacksalong Pacific Coast Highway. (c) ,allow ccrmon open space in front setback area if twenty-five (25) foot setbacks are maintained along Pacific Coast Highway. (d) Require landscaping to reflect .landscape design of Bluff Top Park across Pacific Coast Highway . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, S1 ":OND BY LEIPZIG , TO APPROVE REVISIONS - a) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins NOES : Pierce, Bourguignon STEM VOTE 2Q11_ PASSED i ( a) Allow residential South of Main Street . (^) Delete requirement that residential must 1, physically integrated with •visitor-serving commercial structures . �) Clarify language rogardi :iq conm.ercial uses in Section 4 . 5 . 01 (c) . (d) Revise height in Section 4 . 5 . 04 regarding southeast of Main STreet Erom 12 stories to 3 stories . A STRAW VOTE KOV ON WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE. REVISrONS ( a) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: Livengood , Silva, Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins , Bourguignon NOES : Pierces ST,�.m Y= "=ION PASSED P&QPQS "d. HEY I S ION TO DISTRICT 4 ( a ) R+rvise to 100 percent residential . ( b) Delete requirement that residential mst be physically lntegratetd with mixed-user con ercial structures . K minutes - 3/15/48 -8_ (CA64d) q � !r Alr- DRA A STR 0. VOTE WAS KA.DE BY LIVENGCOD, wkCOND 07 ORTEGA* TO RETAIN ORIrYNu CONCEPT OF DISTRICT r WITH NO L%Z1.j5jQNS, By, THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Pi�urce , Livengood, Silva , Ortega , Bourquignon NOES : Jiggins , Leipzig P .Q. S _ZS�S_T1Tii-ram ( a ) Delete corrirercial anchor concept and err,;phasize minor cultural:'social node . ( b) Clarify maximum height in Section 4 . 0 . 04 to identify, actual height in feet . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS M.-,,DE BY L I VENGOOO, SECOND FAY H I G%G i NS , TO APPROVE REVISIONS ( a) AND (b) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortegr , Higgins :DOES: Pierce, Bourguignon S-11MAW LQN pAS�F p, � 4��D REVISZ4I?�..T4.4.IST.F,��7 ( a) Allow Professional Office (maximum 50 percent of total floor area ) . (b) Delete Mobile Home overlay . ,eROROSEPY,SZ3ZN,S TO DIST1I 7 eY pRapE�TY (a) Delete Corridor Dedication . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WA5 MADE 81` L IVE wr,00D, SECOND BY LE I PZ IG„ TO APPROVE REVISIONS ( a ) AND (b) AN17) DENY REVXS.XON PROPOSES BY PROVERT'k OWNER , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AyL'S: Livengood , Silva, Leipzig, Ortega , Bourquignon NOES : pierce ABSTAIN : Higgins SIMM MUM PASSED PC minutes - 3/16/88 �xo- (0264d) r DIFI-A-0117: (a) Require master plan for each sub-area . ( b) [delete requirement for Masher Plan for entire district . M1EQS E RE IS i�_ �ZB i�'L�J�Y._ 4 'Egt'SC OW a ( a) Revise maximum building height from fifty ( 50) feet to one hundred and fifty ( 150) feet or delete height limit altogeLher . (b) Delete Corridor Dedication . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE: BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO APPROVE REVISIONS ( a ) AND (b) AND DENY REVISIONS PROPOSED BY PROPERTY OWNER, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Livengood , Silva , I.eipzig , Ortega , Bourguignon NOES : Pierce ABSTAIN : Higgir!, 2202 VISIONS 22 DIST LET.. -_�r,=.TBZ�T_._1Q� None A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS .ZM DE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA, TO CHANGE ALL WORDING 'MA'Y" TO "SHALL' ) IN EACH DISTRICT, BY fHE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Pierce , Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , fiiggins , Bourguignon ..DES : None 14rION_ PASSED A NOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA, TO APFRO`!E CODE maNDKENT NO. 80-3 . WITH REVISIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: J AYES : Livengood, Silva , Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins NOES : Pierce , Bourguignon ABSENT: more ABSTAIN: None Mixon s PC Wastes - owN �r..., ' DRA I A MAOTTON WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOriD BY S:;LVA, TO AGLNDIZE AS A DISCUMON ITEM AT THE APIIL S , 19ea PLANNIF./G COlt issiow MLETm Th'R FINAL VERSION OF THE MWNTOW.4 SI ECIPIC PLAW BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Pierce, Livengood , Silva , Leipzig, Ortega , iiigginp , Bourguignon NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None M=N PASSED Commissioner Higgins requested that a minority opinion he inserted for the record concerning District 5 . He felt that retaining the original concept of mixed use with commercial on ground Cloor and office/residential above reflected a difference in opinion than his in the development of the area . -4 �QHDIT,IONAL US& PERMIT ,NQ . fib- N CONJUNCT.19N WITH QQtN I ZONAL EXCEPT ICN (VARIANCE) NO . S Q-6 APPLICANT: GENE N . HILL, Conditi tal Use Permit No . 88-9 is a request to mend the master site pla approved by Conditional Use Permit 82-3 which designated of 01 ct Tract 11473 for common questrian uses to permit const ction of a single family dw inq on the tot . When the Q-R1-( 2 . 7) -8 , 000 zoning was place on the property in 1981 prior to subdivi ng , one of the cond ons of the 'Q" was that any future project app ved for this pa e.1 of land make provisions for equestrian uses with the develo nI: . with the subuequent approval of Tentative act 114 and Conditional Use Permit No. 82-3 (Country View Estat ) i 1982 , an approximately rune-acre lot was not oxide for common a strian stables as well as a common equestrian trait . Conditional Use Permi No . 02-3 o specified a minimum rear Yard setback of 25 feet r homes withi he development , in accordance with the Estate R dential theme. ditional Exception (Variance) No . ae-b is a r est to reduce the tea and setback to 10 feet . guylgo The prop ed project is exempt Class 1 Section 301 and Class 5 8sctio 15305 from the provisions of the Californ Environae ntal Qua t Act . Pc NiauteR - 2/15/48 C +'STA ff '; huntW9tQn booth depa^tmeii ' of comma tRy davelopoomwt REPORI TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: April 5. ")88 SUBJECT: CODE kMENDMENT NO. 88-3 (APPROVED MARCH 15 , 1988 SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF FINAL LANGUAGE) APPLICANT : City of Huntington Beach RM .5a : Review final language of proposed revisions t : the Downtown Specific plan 1...2 ' SugrSrESTED ACTT" Review and accept the final language of proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific plan and Eorward to the City Council . On March 15 , 1988 , the Planning Cormiission approved Code Amendment No . 83-3 by a vote of 5 to 2 ( Pierce and Bourguignon noting no) with a provision that the Planning Commissi;,n review the final language revisions prior to transmittal to the City Council . Staff has revised the language and provisicns per the Planning Commission ' s direction. In addition tn the revisions to Section 4 . 0 , 211e1oeMSnt Standards., staff has prepared language revisions to Sec"fon 3 . 0 . S,peCiEic ,Plan Cgnge t. Prior to City Council action, the revisionx will be incorporated into a legislative draft anal ordinance format . This report addresses specific language revisions to Section 3 . 0 and Section 4 . 0 . For reEerence , the March 15 , 1968 staff r•spoict is attached which addresses environmental , coastal and rediveloppent issues . 2.O 0 AIIALY S I S : The Planning Commission requested that a definition and select provisions be clarified . The following is a summary of the I revisions to the language which occur in Section 3 . 0 , drramcffie P. .D � Damige CQnnal,k, and Section 4 .0. nayal0ur3n", Itand rds , as di roctod by the planning Commission on %Arch 15 , 1968. 3 The summary format for presenting the revised language Lon NKtiOn 3.0 differ: from the sumaty format for motion 4 . 0 . The actual revised language is provided within the summary for Section 3 .0 . 3n Section 4 . 0. the revised language is contained la AttaeNnot 3 and is referescod by paq• numbers. . SUMMARY OV KZ VI5ZV LANKMAGE SLVISED LANGUAGE SECTION 3 . 0 - SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN CONCZPT ( a) Revise lanquage .' A District Six to delete commercial anchor node concept . EiNviled angua" - .5griuhA_.L3 . ftlid.cIl.tla1lC—Mercial) The mixed--use designation is intended to encourage maximum flexibility for the variety of uses allowed . This mixed-use designation includes two Districts (district Five and Six) totalling approximately 43 gross Acres . District a1x is intended to be a neighborhood-oriented shopping and service area with public gathering spots , open spaces and plazas . Services such as the library, post office , banks and theaters should be located here . The commercial activities should center around the year-round residents and include grocery, pharmacy, hardware stores , etc. District Six is approximately 23 gross acres in size including numerous streets and alleys with a potential for vacation. This district is intended to provide equal opportunities for new office and residential developments in conjunction with the commercial activities . This District must be sensitive in design and scale of new development to the adjacent residential neighborhoods . (b) Relocate QJ trL FaUr from Section 3 . 2 . 1 - Mixed-Use (Office/Residential./Commercial ) to Section 3 . 2 . 4 - Residential (High Density) RavispQ Language - Sect oII 3 . 2 .!L - _ Be1JA ttl ial (High Density The residential designation includes three Districts (District Two, four and Eight) exclusively for residential uses . alstlict four is designed to be a transition Leone surrounding the higher intensity commercial core and acting as a buffer for the existing residential neighborhoods . District Dour is divided into lao sections on either side of District live (the Downtown core) . District Dour includes a total of approximately 9 gross acres which will be devoted entirely to residential uses . The Plan anticipates that thin district can accommodate 160 new residential units . This residential district should ensure a buffer area in terms of heig';ts, scale and uses , between the Downtown core and the adjacent gross . i Stott Report 63MOM 4 .0 - D Pl4 M 2T11]IDA tbS SrC.` ION 4 . 0 .04 - DEFIXTTIONS gage 50 • Revise language for Section 4 . 0 . 04 - Suite Hotel SECTION v . 1 . 01 - ADMINISTRATION N I StRJt ION Page 51 Add to : ect;i.on 4 . 0 . 01 : The Historical Resource3 Hoard shall provide design recommendations for structures co.ssid�_nrcd to be historically significant . SECTION 4 . 2 - CENERM, PROVISIONS i Page 54 Clarify Section 4 . 2 . 01 - Non-Conforming Uses Page 56 Clarify Section 4 . 2 . 06 (c) - Setback for subterranean parking structures . Page 58 Revise Section 4 . 2 . 13 - Parking for commercial uses Page 60 Add to Sect- ^n 4 . 2 . 15 ( f ) - Main-ain view corridors at vacated streets in District 2 and District 3 between Walnut Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. Page 62 Add Section 4 . 2 . 26 which addresses the Orange County Transit District Center . SECTION 4 . 3 - DISTRICT 1 Page 66 Delete Office from Section 4 . 3 . 01 (b) and retain in 4 . 3 . 01( a) . SECTION 4 . 4 - DISTRICT 2 Page 70 Clarify language regarding permitted users in Section 4 . 4 . 01 regarding single family detached dwollings . SRCr I ON 4 . 5 - DISTRICT 3 Page 76 Clarify language regarding Qom wrcial uses in SOCtion 4 . 3. 01(c) . Page 77 Revise Height in Section 4 . 5. 04 regarding southeast Of Main street from 12 stories to i stnriea. *Poll* nuOnce refs# to Attaclwnt 3 STCTIOM 4.6 DI M ICT 4 Page @I* C1atur permitt*d uses in Section 4 . 6 . 01 regarding single family detached dwellings . SECTION 4 . 7 - DIMICT 5 Page 87 Retain original concept of Mixed- Use with Commercial on ground floor and office/residential above An Section 4 . 7 . 01 . SECTION 4 . 8 - DISTRICT 6 Page 93 Clarify maximum height in Section 4 . 8 . 04 to identify actual height in feet . NO REVISED LAIIGuAGE in SECTION 4 . 9 - DISTRICr 7 SECTION 4 . 10 -- DISTRICT r SECTION 4 . 11 - DISTRICT 9 SECTION 4. 12 -- DISTRICT.' 10 SECTION 4 . 13 - DISTRICT 11 *Page numbers refer to Attachment 3 a Q ECQt=j DAYI4N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve and accept th-.! final document pursuant to approves: Code Amendment No . 66-3 as presented and forward to the City Council . h • 1 . Area map 2. Draft Ordinance 3 . Exhibit A (Administrative Draft of revisions, Section 4 . 0 of the Downtown Specific Plan) 4 . Staff report dated March 15 , 1988 SH: RLF :kla ' 6 huntW9ftm beach dopartmetit of cormnunity dewlopet+r nt ffAf f EPORT.- TO , Planning Commis-ion FROM: Community Development DATE : March 15, 1988 SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 86-3 (CONTIUnD FVOM K"CH 1 , 1984 PLANNINU COMMISSION MEETING) AEP.1 MM: City of Huntington Beach PI.VQM.T: Revision to expand residential uses in Districts 3, + , 5 and 6 in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts in order to create a more concise document . LQCAT Downtown area generally located along pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard 1 . 0 51MOSTFI? AC.T ION: Approve Code Amendment Nu . 88-3 with findings and recommend adoption by the City Council . Z . —GENERAL iNFoRMAXIDM: On March 1 , 19880 the Planning Commission continued Code Aawndmenit No . 88-3 by a vote of 7 to 0 to a special study session on March 8 , 1988 . The Plan.ing Commission requested that members of the City Council be present so they could be involved with the discussion regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. On March 8 , 19850 staff received direction from both the City Council and the Planning Commission regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. The following is a summary of the direction given wo staff : ( a) Allow residential south of Main Street in District 3 . (b) Delete requirement that residential must be physically integrated with visitor-serving commercial structures in District 3 . (c) Change District 4 from Mixed Use (Office/Residential/ Commercial) to 100 percent Residential . (d) Prohibit presidential fronting Main Street in district 0. EMN CNOS (e) Delete the consrnercial anchor concept in District 6 . M Emphasize cultural/social node in District 5 or District 6 depending on scale . In addition to the direction given at the March 0 , 1988 special study session, staff has a1dressed concerns that have been identified at the prior Planning Commission meetings and study sessions (February 17 , 1988 Planning Commission meeting , February 23 , 1988 Special Study Session and March 1 , 1988 Planning Commission meeting) . Code Amendment No . 88-3 is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 19300 . 4 from the provisions of the California Environmental Qu W t7 Act , 1986 . In addition , Section 1 . 2 , 52 cifiC Plan Pracadure s , in the Downtown Specific Plan requires that any amendment constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and the State ' s Environmental Impact Report guidelines . The proposed revisions have been evaluated by an initial study which has been included as an attachment to this report . The proposed zoning code mouifications constitute a lessening of intensity to the Downtown Specific plan, thus modifications are covered by the Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report No . 82-2 which was certified by the City Council on July 18 , 1983 (see attached Initial study) . l.,.g._._CQASTAL STATUS : The Downtown Specific Plan is the implcmenting ordinance of the Coastal Element and the proposed revisions are consistent with the Local Loastal Program contained in the Coastal Element which was certified by the Coastal Commission in March 1985 . Pursuant to Section 989 . 5 . 0 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , a Coastal Development Permit is not necessary with this application . Coastal Commission certification of the proposed revisions is required after Council adoption . The Coastal Element identifies coastal policies regarding visitor-serving commercial and residential opportunities . The proposed revisions will allow greater residential developMent opportunities in selected areas within the Downtown Core Area while still retaining ample visitor-serving coiNwrcial opportunities . The Coastal Act also requires the provision of low and Iroelerate i*C~ housing opportunities within the Coastal Zone. By incteasing affordable housing opportunities , the proposed revisions in the Downtown Specific Plan are consistent with the Coastal Act. d. Istdf0 (02024) wRi • STA 33154 The Downtown Specific Plan contains the zoning and development standards for the Main-Pier Redevolopment Project Area which was adopted by the City Council in 1982 . The goals of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area are to provide affordable housing opportunities, to preserve historically significant buildings while eliminating blighting influences , the elimination of seismic deficiencies , and to improve and expand visitor-serving commercial facilities . .6 . _- SPECI IC_..L'I" : The proposed revisions are contained within the established boundaries bnd districts of the Downtown Specific Plan . Section 3 .0 of the Downtown Specific Plan provides the language which describes the specific plan concept . According to Section 3 . 0 . the design concept emphasizes the ocean , ocean activities , the City Pier as the primary focus of the Downtown Area . within the design concept , encouraging inland pedestrian movement along Main Street will provide support for proposed commercial use$ along the Main Streit Corridor . Encouraging inland movement can be accc:ntp11shed by providing a cultural/social node near the intersection and/or a parking structure near the intersection of Main Street and Orange Avsnue . 17 . 0 SU@I_IVISI4N:QM'l1= : Not applicable. L. 4 I,S5SM AND A.'r1ALMS : Staff is proposing revisions in the Downtown Specific Plan in order to clarify and update language and also to expand residential uses in the Downtown Core Area . The basis for the revisions sterns from direction on specific projects by the City Council and discussions with prospective builders regarding the realistic market demand . Also, staff recognize4 input from the general public regarding shifting the emphasis from a strong commercial core area to a seaside village concept . The intensities of the Downtown Core Area are intended to be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods as well an providing an adequate economic base for the City. The proposed ravistions are consistent with the original design concept for the Downtown Area . A change in District 4 from Mixed-use to 100 Percent Residential will protect the adjacent , established neighborhoods from commercial impacts . Staff feels this will provide bittac land use compatibility. ey prohibiting residential along Main Street in District S , a coaaaercial aeetor will link the Main/Pier area with the nor;:bern boundary of District 3 . This represents a shift of the northecn Iteet -3- Al terminus of the Main Street Corridor from District 6 to District 5. This shift will allow the reduction of como*rci a l f loot area but still provide opportunities for neighborhood goods and services for a household population. In District 3 , by deleting the requirement that residential floor area must be physically integrated into visitor-servin /sized-use commeecial projects, staff envisions 9 p j greatF.r opportunities for increasing a perennial population and flexibility in development design . Permitting residential south of Mann Street represents lessening the perceived intensity of the existing provisions contained to the !Downtown Specific Plan . The revision to allow greater residential opportunities in District 3 is based on the idea that more residential floor area is needed fur year-around support :or proposed commerci A 1 floor area . Staff has proposed revisions Wtich include : ; 1 ) Clarification of terminology and language ; I ( 2 ) Imposing setbacks ; ( 3 ) Pla:xninq Commission approval of all new Construction; ( 4 ) Changing District 4 from Mixed-Use to 100 Percent Residential ; ( 5 ) Prohibiting residential along Main Street in District 5 ; ( 6 ) Allowing residential south of Main Street in District 3 . Although the revisions will create a more precise document and will decrease the amount of potential commercial floor area in District 4 , only two revisions are necessary to allow forward progress of the proposed Redevelopment Project ( Phase I ) at the northeast corner of Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Allowing residential south of Main Street and d::lating the requirement that residential trust be physically integrated with a visitor-serving commercial structure in District 3 are required for Phase I to Conform to the Downtown Specific Plan. These revisions are consistent with the Coastal Elenwnt and will be considered by the Coastal CommiWon to be a minor change. If necessary, the balancer of the revisions can be postponed to a later date as part of a larger overall code amerdmat . 9 . 9 R FOMIp t N : Staff recomsonds that the Planning Commission approve Code Amend ent No . e0-3 and recomaend adoption by the City Council . 1 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No. 88-3 are consistent with the goals and policies of the dmnerel Plan, Coastal Rle nt and Main.-pier Redevelopmeat Fro jest Aree . Stiff Report - 3/15/8S P_ .- i i Z . Revislon■ proposed in Code Amendmnt So. 88•3 will cleats a note concise document and will better address recent eoneirns regarding implementation of development entitlements in the downtown area . 3 . Changing District 4 from mixed-use visitor serving commrcial to all residential as proposed in Code Amendment No . 88--3 will provide greater opportunities fur increasing a perennial population in the downtown area. a . Allowance for freestandinq residential in Districts 3 , 5 and 6 as proposed in Code h.mendment No . 88-3 will permit greater flexibility in design of projects in the downtown area . 5 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No. 88-3 will be compatible with adjacent residential development . 1,1 . 0 AMP.Nh.TIVC ACTIO: I The Planning Commission may wish to focus Code Amendment No. 11-3 an the revisions to allow residential south of Main Street and deleting the requirement that residential must be physically integrated with a visitor-serviny commercial structure in District 3 in order to allow forward progress of the Phase I Redevelopment Project and request the balance of the revisions to be included in a future code amendment . .kT_TJkCHW.TS: 1 . Area map 2 . Summary of Revisions to Sections and Districts 3 . Matrix of Development Scenarios 4 . Draft Ordinance 5 . Exhibit A (Administrative Draft of actual revisions to the Downtown SpAcific PlAn) 6 . Maps depicting adopted and proposed land use concepts 7 . Letter from Huntington Beach Company dated February 4 , 1988 a . Environmental Initial Study HS:RLF: kla Stoif Uport - �l1�/�• -s-. • .. . �Oa� I _'_ "-_ _ _ �f�J,,•'id♦►i�.��au•A•Nial N►1��'wt\1 w1���\�9 ..1.\.••ail• • in1.�\i• _? . iIs N I NNI we.Me vqw 1 • it Y-t1f, -*icy-' -•�-� �-•y �'rr• -JMLWI --t ��•. Y`'a'' t j` L�--� - �� — �.� � tit.• lti+ica �� �� /� . • �'� ' i . ff . ;�r-,;-'_ , . •.+nf1, •.aft.. •.»fear. .r '� . .tl i •r t`; ; - A Stew q• t ------• �j •.� t f! •_ � il�l f•( k w + � Of it . ``\ •1 - '1 rQ 1 f � �• i ''L � •fir• � � �. �•� .,��J t�Ijl_ I � ��i:ro.�' NSC JP l Nr show11M �11 WKiFIX "M stmoom SUM P01101/ %swam ON 1110101/1 ttfM:lNo tat�111� !A'A"1� i �+.�...._ 1�IIN1MtNli wwnt ttlNsrrlttwl�w IolRLr1M�111 t-f.1. IowtvA I.P. aftrift ftm t1101111111 a11Mtn • 1'ttNl 1.1. O tw Its M 111 to 1Ni11911C1 rKwlMi (w. 40 solos; 11111 /1111 tlMr MM0111 C*I11Rs>I'!�l 1 1ti,M1 1/ t'I,tNt // N1.I11 l/ M.1M 1► M�,IIN �1 M.M of M.Ittll of 1NilMAlll (21,4114 01) Iw gal Is I84.101 it) _ .. POOL FIN vos. (20.ra ll) l:t.l'N if) KS1310,11At Ile %alto J" Mill 1,Id1 cwllt I.X@ rw:tl loll Willi No vato$ 4111 gal IN CE#'1lK1M 16.306 of V.ro %f 44.311 of MAN 0 M.3" It I"'Sw 1f 144,00 of 000 rot ON nw - - 0".1w so) {frl.m it) 4+0 ]I$ of to.On I - L1.IM 11 11.M of I(Itpfuf!#� )S Mltl 1, Mitl Sit v41t) 0" ►+l:l 2V wait$ VA ,omit% as tops 4A 71 PAP. Ctal. - - - 100.titSQ if - - C0IMK1Al. 4 - - 111,1!# II If - - ,RliClt - 650 1f 1T7, )W - 7t,00mi it - - 1(S11f>t'1A:. !'0 Willi So wilts 661 ,.Ali% to; y.ltr 1" gaps 1N +gall% Ile m II% !(>MfK:AI S I ll A" If 111.00 It 751.0.14 t) 1Sb.o;w I? 111 ON 11 t11.&A of sM.0141 If arfl'I 7S.M If M3" So' 11(l.G1/ %1 75,0M of 30.30 a r1.an If do.M* of +ESM167iAl yQ ./4I16 SO .rnitl 660 wAitt rzq ..Alt% M units 117 opts% tN Mild ;4tih'f►C:AI S 41.0co it 41.0ft of SA! 404 it 00.0w it SS.M it 66,110 to #O.11M of �r)iC1 r0.W0 1i t.).X% II TS. 19 M %• AI.we I U.w• if imRTiT'JTiC)M1 10.0" 0 11.MO II - - I8.t100 1• 14.000 It 110.111114 N tl31"tl1��A1 M .-'to :) weI14 417 ,.•itI 4,0o +%rtI IN omits lr Motto tr 11011111 !'V"kc16 1 I,S00 if TAM %f S1S till :/ SO.a00 of - S1./M if Sti1.110 •f ll(tCl - - - 19#.111 if it O Tt1. SC ,•t, S.i rr,t - am rat Soo ►rat dM me 11p1 rw MAN a1 t::.S= t:, - t110.0w M (tri.Vo ir) tt11.04110 II) t1w.tlA +tI COK1CtJK 1 - - l.OQti if • Ct1Ia(11►19111 CYR - 401SIMta Is1 .r,lt1 1!1 omits l.i f1 vnitl 1." Willi Ingalls 1 URI14 1.M M111 MIMIC iK t+ - fy1.two 11.tIq %f 11,0" of N1, SS it tw9L )N r Is 141 fare "It .>M 40 R" two r" t,a I" I.R:I Iw 14A. If) (64.111 11) (t1i1.tt1lt Ill t140.1101 tf1 (1M.11i1 It) t1.H1.iM N) 11.1++1.1111 N' i 1111010"I l w gape M mltl tl - • AMICI t 11 11.t1111 of M. if - 11.111 1f li'l./M It if p.Iw A �ISi1M 1 (m•■mtl. foi111ng) tlRi)iKf+M I1 ?.No 1f T.M if • 7l.ttM If 1.40 It f,wre of 1t #I)I�I sal 10 wits we I#i t/ - In omits IM 00 N t�AL t'�tIf�C1�l 1111.o1 ttf IN,IN .f I.M1,11M of 0/.81 of rt1.tlM if 11►1.01 UI M.M v 11iIiL M 11w M on & 1.II0 r+11 1.02 mitt t.M M S.1O 0% 4w.wl I/1 1130.9m N) 111M.0/ Itl 19M,3111 all 11.47.1" 1/1 11.�. M, tt1ls1f�11N�1 11*1 tttM/ll •.Am %%%slit• 1.1M dell If no am" >iAM r11M 1.0 swim 1ti.t111 tr 11.A1 1.w1.1flt 1M.wr M r111.tN11 N =AM M sun of ftlwwM # ah"G #gq, OPO4ww1 td +ill# no flon 1>i1 00 9 anus M+1 06 0 11094" �� c . I -ery arm HLxYTwv6TbM onammU.� 2000 MAIN STREE'' CALIFORNIAPH OFFKX of?m C"CLOW May 19, 1 gin California Coastal Commission 24S west &oadway. Suite 380 P.O. Boat 1450 Loft beach. CA 90E01 California Coastal Commission: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach approved Code Amendment No. U-2 and Ordinance No. 2942 at its introduction on May 2, 1993 with amendments. he City Council adapted Ordinance No. 2942 on May 16, 1988 which reflect the revisions contained In Code Amendment No. 88-3. Ordinance No. 2942 ai11 become effective cn June 3, 1998. This a final decision baazd on the analysis arvJ findin as outlined in the Request for . i* b dec Y 6a � Council Action dated May 16, 1988. 1f you have any questions reprdinE this matter, please contact our office at 536-5221 or the Planning Division at 5:36-52 7 1. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:cb frrcloswre:: 1. Request for Council Action staff rep wt dated May 16, I9U. 2. CortifW Ordinance No, 2142. a::: Paul Cook, City A&rhibtrstor DvA La Wk. Dlre.;tor of Community pit *Iapment Mt*& Adams, Dlrvctor of PlannitK Roger Slates. PlarmUS Commin mer 1w1r,.r srat�i� �'� I FIE"* FOR CITY COUNC@ ACTKM In Sibu —_ MM1r3: Honotsble Mayor and City Council tsd by: Paul Cook, City Aalx+inistrata r_1?`f-_C - heMrerby: Douglas H . La Belle, Director , Community COD'S 111 KKOMK ' NO, 8 8—3 �. Coireiebb, with CeeerWN Pwky? 14 Yeu 1 1 New Police or EavNrtiern 84sewimit o1 lawer. ReconwvwwhWw, Am*ysk' FurWkm %urm, 1J nwthv Astons, A : MSAZ'�Y O>* Ifif VE Trans.aitted for your consideration is an amended version of Code Amendment No. 88-3 - Revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan . At thv May 2, 1988 City Council nwieting Code Amendment go. 88-3 was approve"I by a vote of 7 to 0 . Staff was directed to clarify atelect provisions of the proposed ordinance for the second reading . a I 511=10N: Staff recommends t7rat the City Council adopt the second reading for Code Amendment No . 88-3 with the revised 14ngua.ge contained in the amended ordinance as prepared by the City Attorney based un the following findings : EMDEN ]'Q$_AMOYAL: 1 . Revisions proposed in Code Awindment No . 88-3 are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plant Coastal Elwment and Main-Pier Redevelopmant Project Area. x . Revisions proposed in Core Amendment No. 88-3 will create a raora concise document and will hatter address recent concerns regarding implementation of developawnt entitlesrents in the townt n area. 3 ,, Changing District 4 from raised-use visitor-serving colrlworcial to one-hundred ( 100) percent residential as proposed In Cad* Amendment No. 88-3 will provide greater opportunities for i iacrtasing a perennial population in the dowaetown area. 4 . Jt11owancre for freestanding residential in districts 9 *,-:4 d as p.tivosed in Code Amendment No. dd-f will Vomit dreator fLuibilitt is design of peojects is the dawetown srtoo. 7 iaioets proposed in CAWO fiat No. SS-3 will be c�oopatible with adjseent r*sideatial development . i . Tbo deletion of the Nobilolt~ District from District 7 is c.amaisteat with the findings required by Californis Qa ,d Section 66437.4 and findings required by be^ticn 9270.004 Of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade. During the discussion at the May 2 , 1988 City Council meeting regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan, staff was directed to clarify a Aumber of provisions throughout the docwnnt . Staff has reviewed and revised the language an directed by the City Council . The following is a sunnary of the revisions which have been incorporated into a revised ordinance. SCT119M 3 Q fileECZlrIC PtA CONCEPT Section 3 . 2 . 4 Dela�e (High Density) Section 4 . 2 . 01 (d) Clarify non-conforming uses Section 4 . 2 . 13 (b) Include Planning Commission language for commercial parking requirements and include District 6 as directed by the City Council Section 4 . 2 . 13 (d) Revise to original language as adopted in nrl�cber 1983 Section 4 . 7 . 15(f) Add language to maintain horizon view corridors in District 10 Section 4 .4 . 01 Clarify language regarding single family detaches! dwellings Sectiou 4 .4 .06 Add teference to public right-of-way Section 4 .6 Modify language regarding District 4 Section 4 .6. 01 Clarify language regarding single family det&ched dwellings S4ketion 4 . 6. 03 Deiete reference to full block *00 35 units per � gross acre I Section 4. 10.01 Identity eacia & rbare+s within District S dyed les S. 12 .0 I "vise Oa l l to &I , mt appl icablo p �� 1. �►r�a wta� AmmWed ara i nance i 3. WA dat4d May 2 , 191;e PC: D!m4m:RLF: kIa 3 k ti t r i :a • •. "< � � may' � � • 14 Vail Cl T 11 .dog � r. / • =, .�, � -ems- ! � - ` � t 4-or 5i- 1 Wy dhv , Ila or „r,4AAVS COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOO OCAT04 Ca0Meli 004&� 4419 To I�laaarz a Mtl w aad From Paid Camp � h'k I* ! Memb4srt or the City Caunc l City Adsadastmraaw r uY Sub(m i I nun RWARMG Data April 271 19U COW AlM1060M NO. �'RGI,O v REVEM S TO THE DOWN I OWN SPECWX PLAN The folkmft it a list of eta jmr discusskm Items by the planning Commission rirdar d1i the prapowd revisions to the Downtown Specific PIwL The major topics of dieeum oru � waMr: 1. Commercial Parking Standarda 2. Ra kkatial Dereh*nent Standards in District 4 3. Concept Revision to District 5 4. Location of Cultural Center in District 5 and/or District g Those items were discussed at great length by the Planning Commission and staff during the nvnerous meetings that occured during the processing of the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan and warrant further discussion by the City Council. ANALIMSa 1. On April 19. 19U, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved final daMuage for Section 4.2.13(b) which pertains to commercial perking statulards. The Planning Commission required that propottd developo mt In Districts 1, 2, 4. 7, A. 9, 10 and 11 provide are—hundred (100) percent of the parking requirvowts ot"ite and that all development projects shall comply with City-wide parting standards for off+srmt parting. The Plemkig Commission approval of this section completes the Planning Coarmisslon review. 2. am — IQ DMUWLA The Pbwmbg Commission approved the pn*oaad wow oi' rMoO Di oUt 4 ftt+ass arlmod va otastsareiallr+ d&mtial to (ice idr901161. Upon eMo I-r ateal„M or fad t try and 010"Obi1ity, atapeap� -aa ;Wei the !'fig c4a misrlar rem anewbtiM Suff prgp prrt+iMOft I single faa ft detached d"MW le ftWI t eta Odd itMrretstj. Part tea-rsr +am" It toWw"Mud tM ow" ham arsrr.rlr ar t ft meth 1 tamtam a seer l di �r Is Uisaiet M • A2 to r Igo Jda lib* SON" with tM Clear C4rM■"sid nois13 COOWWMr ili--Mts dWeand a aNMW rrrrlalaw tw Dwain S. At .lsr 1! PSaNiag CasssiNi�r stwsti�a tine prap a l trsvieitra ro District S as pros itid by Commissiow Ndon wry MAC"d by 00 11010suft CoswM tOW bar a vow or 3 - 2. AI'trr tlw vote. Cosstst now a Al--lss rwlo m " slot a sawaitir 1"M its srwd and iorwardsd to that City CoZil. (Attschsaent ). Dwft the dkc=km Mprding the location of tki Cultural Arts Cattir, two districts wens klentifled as possible locations. The Planr fed Coa mkidw recommended that a minor Cultural Arts Center be located to District i, aarth at CrmVe Avow, which would be linked to the existing Public 1.bnwy In w driticture and function. The PlannlnS Co minim ream -tadr d that a oa r Cultural Arts Center be located Knuth of Dragp Avaeare M District S. Staff recommends that the City Council: A. Replace the language in Section 4.2. 13(b) with the following: Proposed commercial development projects within Divricts 1. 2, 4. 7. 80 9. 14 and 11 shall provide or*-hundred (100) percent of the required parking do-site. B. Replace the language in Section 4.6.01 with the iollowing: permitted 11w. The following residential uses shall be permitted in District 04: roulti-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock cooperatives subject to approval of a Conditional Use permit: Exceptkw: a. Single family detached dwelling are only permitted in Diatrkt 40. b. Single Family Detached Dwellings which comply with the devtlopsaent standards in Obtr'ict 4 shall be aubfect to the approval of the Gaign It view. ATTA 1. MW of SwdfM Irian Muicts 1. amity Rrpart r"Wdit nhv!orter Hiaia'a cot�pt revisloa for Dbe t S. MC:RLF:be UM DMON N. La 1k1li. Dip C W CRY /1 ini i a w 41- folio 1�#s�tclst Ii- Visitor-Servim Cowmercial !otllet 82- Residential 6LBUict 12- Visitor-Serving Commercial Oist iet 04- Mixed Use; Office/Residential Dis!=ict IS- Mixed use; Cow ercial/Office/Residential bistsict Ii- Mixed Use; Comwercial/Office/Residential District !?- Visitor-Serving Commercial DU teiet i$- Righ Density Residential District it- Co srcial/Recreation Ddstsfct 010- tits-Related Commercial District 111- Reach Open Space u Qa � �] C���DDD�7DDDDDDD O 0 �D U U L-,0 000000000000 DD ob 0on-000000000 2 2 Cw w 3 A D MACH CAUFCOM FIGURE 4 . 0 o h M11tk on Back pholeg C968118191 ►.a. x rrrr C^LrMGM� TO: City Council FROM: PlatftitrS Commisawn DATE: April14. 198R I SLlBJISCT: IrtWORITY RJEPORT !RECARDDfG PROK)SED REYSK7►!VS TO DGTRXT 5 j WiTHIN THL DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN At the March 15. 199S Planning Commission mtetft, proposed revisiar to the Dwnlo" � Specific plan. District S were rejected by a vote of S - 2. After that vote. Commina o w Higgirts requested that a minority report regarding the action be peepared IdaarttifyinR t?w proposed revisiaen that were presented at the February 23. 19U Joint Study Seaslon with the City Cecil ants the planning Commission by Commissioner HiStim. The objective of the revisions recornmerxied by Commissioner Higgins is to separate commercial and residential. The following is a surnmary of the revisiom which were presented by Commissioner Higsirm: commercial mould be allowed only on both sk*s of dairy Street: the east side of Fifth Street and west side of Third Street QWy if those 1/2 blocks are consolidated. The balance of District S would be rtsidential (including the separate area along Lake Street. The sufaested revisions are similar to the 3D/l plan which is attached. /10 f - , ,;f - - y4j�*4� - rank Hir4i. Planning Commissioner FH.RLF:Sbm Attachment: 1. 3DA Proposed Land Uses f . ` I Vlvf co r , . • ,.' q�fir• y+. OAAKiNe .• � . fir• 46 dl- do r .� We �. r� 45. Pw;"Cd Lat l i f' REQUES FOR CITY COUNCI,;.ACTION Dings • illyd so: Honorable Mayor and City Couarii 1� swoo twd by: Paul E. Cook. City Admkilstrator�o\�(- he" by: Douglas La Belle. Director of Community Devel &Aiq• CODE AIMENDI OfT NO. U-9 Cwm*w+t with Cwwocil PfAky7 j Ya t i Mew Polk-V or Exc+ap WJ06) ftunont of ImA, li ....,w nihti w,, Am*yA, Fundins Uuma, Ak iw Actions, Attastrwaww. ff Arx- Transmitted for your consideration is Code AmvWment No. U-3 which reflects proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. The revisions ex;�and residential uses in District 3 and 4, clarify langun8e. add minor ptovisimis and add six new aefinitkwo. in addition to the approved reviskme, Commissioner HigSins requested a minority report regarding revisions to District 5 which were not accepted by the Planning Commitskm. I The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council rpprvve and adwt Code Amendment No. 83-3 as prepared by the City Attorney's office. Plarming Commission action at March 15, 1988: ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY SILVA, THE PLANNING COMM 5.S10N APPROVED CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-3 SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF FINAL LANGUAGE hT THE APRIL 5, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION !MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, SILVA. LEIP_'IG, ORTEGA, HIGGINS NOES: PIERCE, ROURGUIGNON ABSENT: NONE AI STAIN: NONE Planning Commission action an April 5. 198& ON MOTION BY LCVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ORTEGA, THE PLANNING CAMN�35IpN APPROVED THE FINAL LANGUAGE FOR CODE AMENDMENT NO. U4 EXCEPT FOR SECTION 4.2.13(b) CC*A MERCIAL PARKING; STANDARDS WWCH WILL .SE AT THE APRIL 19, 1988 PLANNING COM1rA5 M MEETING, AMD RJECOhO�IE]�IMD ADOPTION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: Arm. LraNGOOD, SILVA. LEIPZIG, ORTEGA, HKIGGINS, B0U1W UKPM Imo: MIRCE . T: IKW AWA N: N= wr.. t to revke the Dmaton lips ne rim wWA was , 1"s by to Cat C&I Cotradwhw as UWCh 310 Ion, 11t# C;tt,r Ca�R. ar the A�ncy. tad tttafC a at�lce thw tl o to Depow rw ftiedne Piss a pewit reddeatial am as *A Rraatisd lttwrl rr DhVict 3 a heft eoeet tea, south Main Suet. TM dkeml lar�ut,��Apr�iar �S. l� d�ition a drr dtr+�cted l3� 113i��wntrrwm %wdf'k Phw ottrrr r�evieierit hm boo appr+o�d by tiro 1% Offi t i egg as treetr staff. TM r+rrltlorr prtpased by staff imluie a6dirt3 dx (6) rr*-N defURitions, aobw revitim to t3eomml PnWlritewo 1*#Mt 4 fidwe- coaowctial to 100 p�snmt 1NWM1d6I aad rlaM� fruit ra of np tfrr�rart S�rc-tia, 4.a, Theta nvk*w re(Wt staffs detln to etatify and improve the docummat is o dw to Otter Mrid, U,:h dp f--Ml � 1 lde+rs who kv about pereaitted ice d s o t vehtF ri.s,ttAndaMs. TOw fwgk4ift is a aftmary of revisions Wbkh the hlawdat Cersttlttr 1C 1,1W, an April S, 1 . All prgxwW cipros octy to Sectket 3.0. and Sectim 4.0, , whleh will be fcrvar�ded to t onto Caatm for catificttion. i KCtIfJiN 3.0 - SPECIFIC PLAN aEiClr[ CitNC.EI'f i PbW 13*, Relocate District Four, Section 3.2.1 - Mi:ae"se 19. 23 (Of'fire/Reskiential/Commercial) to District to Swim 3.2.4 - Rasldential (High [entity). PW 19, 20 Delete commercial anchor twvde coftcpt from District F. SF_C TXM 4.0 - DEWLOFM .1+iT STANDARDS P&P 40 Swtitt .0-1b - ikfipiLk= Add mw definition for common open wace„ gross site arta, private grans � space. Pap 30 Add new definitW for Suite Hotel. 5"ti ��L- l�iesras,�� Page 31 C1ar ify UwVmge asrd add lan uaar regardi,g DesiSn Revlim Boot t1 and Hlawrical Rewxces Sc srd. ftse 52 Add WWtsse neyprdirt,; sprcial permit for compliance with State and Proderal Lair. Paps 33 Clarify language. • pop ambers, refer to AtUclrseeat 3 RCA - MUMM=- �OM1itp i 4.2 P*P 56 Add POIN4�i �i t'lve (5) fa m dMtb fw fhsot **so* wasp is t Clarity lowmae. Pop Sf Add addltWoll ouAro wdol parkift ptidrlbwa► Pais iR Add larguype ro*skv.amn;e to regmu a to laduavy noWwI& Pqe 6U. Clarify larypvt/o. 62AQ SatiMcM4.�.�lYtttr s ' ftSo 65 hem ucttmt rmmitted wes. Pie 66 1lo**e /prrAW level be vM! aaatasr+14 1aI wss. Pfts 67 Clarify loguye. Page 70 Add lxqpnp tit pliCk family det.aod~Ikw wl" 0000y with dmlopumt standards doll be W r'o vW by Dsdp Rovkm VwM. C%Wttfy Irani MtbU* UWNPAP. Page 71 Clarify I&MUS e. Pqe 72 Clarify OM MOM qw spoor► Pra►tsb=L 75&76 Allow --AA—tl�al pound lowtituW ow iu�rNr�rrelOst* haf Mob* t t. rat (8) noriss for asses madWm st of tubs Reset. SIWOLA as ftso so Add liner to rovbe Dbuftt 4 home aimed i ss to 10 PW W DoWu a hood use iaouese. e PW rAwbwo refer to AttolrAMM 3 WA -400M y if MEL 011112 p Cyr" fit. S 1. ftP DOWf lap !S Delete f i qob soaet dot I gial awt be plgala ft b*WaUW wkb �r�r�clal itrtlCtl�. • i ftv 100 R"P*m mutw COMWAMl PIM for "Ch ftbar" rather dw the OW&O district. 1'10e 101 C1at* bqPAW. 104 Clarify MOVO , Ssc M J. ftip 107 Clarify Wouvw. 10 lme au Mmn War to Attachrr-rrt S is Wddm to dw aped toviskm to dw Daaratavi Specific Phm rIQmmnW tftrt a mkm ty repon be iu bmbd to tbf rapart Me dw CMy Coundl (me i ARic Wa t 7). The ■&*o tt" tm t Wv to Dfstrlct S %*kb tits stisarlgr f tut 1.1 MW M 4 Ob9dw. a- ar� 1NI0tr 414 aot WOOM t do rfamwft Cmml 1 ""a's action to raft my cltaa�rs � Doeayct S. Am WAb=tW im rite actim m Aprd S, 190. the flrral for teas 4A 13N Carrmmial Pwkft stmdw* WM be flow% somj 190. The I%d arum" of tics diva doa wW be pRaaatiad m fire Chy Cowe11 dtrisd staff p mmnu laa Cob Amendmem Na W4 i oa1 low l IF,a Mum" to tiao 10 .+i fM►ot#t pnWb6 ■a of doe 010, rir ► l� The prtWe d ds ca medWkedm i of q " Do----Do---- %, Wl�� M i I% a [M OVA MW t m J* is. 19N. A-* 40MM -4- lM1li lq�r llt is it of OR 11 11 Be"Amer Callmi a craw in ftmalt r me C40otal Crafiiam olRillcrtiQa o� rlmirrr regvAed attar C aiopdo- The D�ewrroia�r �pacilta Mob thrSamat r dw C4aatal Zi mmm atrl *0 pp Imp" ar rethdoma e �t with thi Laaei Corral err aoatmbW ill As C 1 E1trOOK �hiah was -----A lid%r the Comrtal IN Merck 15". The C.oWWI id elflmr canal paildr reperrdlrM vm aarotal mend apwtMathm The prop l d will allow pear mideadel dewla appartudtin Is arleeted mamma wid" the lyawatown Corr Ans. Ilrbe Ceartni Act alma 3***er the pmvidm or low and amadrritr boom harm oppwtualtirm withlrr tit Cammtal Zone. by im r r i u hl afford" hvuair op rtua ANk th*prcpoamd ieriMor W thr Dmntowa Spft4fic Fun are consistaat wi the Coutal .A". i The D watdwn Specific Plan emtaiam the zaft mad do"laprant xuwAmb fen *a Maier- W Radwelop rt Project Area which was adopted by the City C&AWN in IM. The oak of the Maks.-piw Rmkv l—m It Projac% Area are to prcmWW of ordure boaft ppartwdtim, to p enrve hbtarically mi&fk=t buiidinpi widle ellaiaaft bhg%tft 0rrfUrerrcra9 the elirabiatba of mrrimtaic deficiencies, mW to iarp+at►e and expwA ,►imitarvirid aor.raarcial facilitiro. Not applicable. The City Courscil may mWify Cak ,Aemardaent Na. Wl as drtred. 1. Arve bd* 1. Matrix of Dvrt~aprrent Scaratiam 3. AdiairiistrmtWe ar*ft 4. crdiaanoe S. Map dsplabW adapted and pe posed Lend d Uwia i. Mlapm d-pletlni exletimg and propumed Spwific Man Zmft aMtr ku i 7. i&iii ArPor't t. Mliautam troy M1-breh 15. IM llamt Cora6siou rraet ft 9. Phmw rrp Coma!miaa Staff Rgmn dented April S. 19N DL B:RLF:sbra i RCA - 4AR M 04134 J 1 , 1 IPA �K1.0 �:•i+r' "rft favor me am% wow soft DIMP01610" Nmmft Pun 'c) • i 1�011 Ib 1d mOdON 1AM M1 r or""M as dlMrltrM wwrh ww orb a WAM�wrrM iMrrwr� A�INTATUMI Caged by prww�r�InMM#EMI C 11 M�. COM OL erjum Pu►awn b"pow OWS-0 a c.wr a..MSPOw APO w wwwwow•www camew c4waiwom go rw m*A Mn*"*awe .��. OMPLOA ate►of OwWOOL "W "so or ft Ir a�IM��w w err � MMrr+NrMr 1dr •�:; A1l MI'����IN arr MrMIM Ira1rM�r1dM�AMf11��� IF II N '." „= « femme � r aJaA1■ri I"we aA OWwe oft*of ft C"amok 1raMr " MAe1M7�011 UAAI C"T C&AWL.sp duft IL WaftaM6 W4 6101 y ■w .r t7� • fr a „t. • ti r M 1IISM Pdit �swwr M Doom a no �•� c.wom imj T and STATS OF CALOO MMA CMMMy M d'1Mw G"r ONW"elm 1 so • C*wn of *a Um*W slow mW a M 0 IM C&JFft Aftr+e"W: I am a►wr I" op of +spipil srr Wd rm a pl m to or hew M " bmw MMNMd rr4M. I on a prwipW cWk of Ow Or~ CoMt DAILY MOT. with cmbW" ft �•� G - f+lllfYS-mss. a nowsoftpwr of pniral Woulatm. prided end pub6oh" a fhs Cal of Costa mm Caoft of Or WV. ! Uft of CaNfOrnia. and IhW it dw tM "Ch"My allSOW I Ve a it a I" and "RWW" Ca ft. wfrl pr 90 6n0 pubM W a+ the Carta NNW fMi OPWISSM. rMu dMIS n h. FMun1an V&Vft, k . tlw South Cost cww"U tfft and Lama Bosch *mm of I" nrwipr w for one G* t*aibvv wm*s to *a "m "UmaI of April 21 11N s its- 1 dMK11rf+M. un&.. pwwty Of p#rhxy. tw ft 1�ftWVMMYV IM tI'uM W4 Goff fti. an Agri 1 21 IgoM if C ma L40". C wfhxro& PO M-106 Elm ,met rJ94112 mumrte WTICE is mum GIM that the Notinpto §Wb City Cowell vlll hold public h"rill In the Cowell Clseasber at the N ati mitoal end Civic C414ter, I= Main Strreet, Not 1 nsdoa Hach, Ca l l focal o. so the date and at the tine ladicated below to receive and consider the statem ats of all persam Mho with to bt heard relative to the q*llcation described below. am: Monday, May 2. 19W i Imo: 7:00 P.M. so=: Code Amendment No. W 3 City of Nun t i ng ton teas;h LWAUM: Downtown area generally located al W"Ard ci flc Coast Miry between Goldenwest Street and teac (see attache0 orp) • M: Oowatown Specific Plan Itevislon to expand residential -)its In districts 3 aasr , to the Omntown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts which will create a more cooclso document : Covered by Envir tal topect Newt ft. 02.2 Pursuant to Section "9.5.0 a Coastal Ileveiapment Permit is not necessary with this 4"llcatlom. The California rAd sta 1 cmi s s ion will review the proposed changers N-flu: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the D"artewat of Community Devoloprento, 2000 Ibis Streit$ Nuartl loaCh, Call formal 92644. for inspection by the P011 c. A CoPx of the staff report will be mi lable to laterested parties at Cl ?y Mall or the Main City Library, 7111 Talbert Avow. ALL INTEKSTE0 rER3Eth5 are invited to attend said hoorl law express OPINION$ or suMt evldeace for or aplwit the 4011cation ai twlloat 86M. If there art aq 4mtionst please call Robert fraaklia. Associate 'teamer at S31�4271 or the Of 11 co of the Cl ty Cl orlt. LU-SW INAiTINGT01h KACN CITY CCA IL tar: Al I c la M. Watowth CI ty Clerk Phone (7 •) Sad-IM Wed 41W" f AI= do .F• •. I • I • , r+ (�J/�J\� � 1 �' ��/•�tom/ IEILI //2*oil , lfZ /'? " t 1 l t» y t The .111 Downtown f rmr.Specieflec Plan w�. 1 P-tr,.. tr CDAi AN iMT MD. 00. 3 (Rovisionr to the Downtown specific Mine specifically Districts 2rf b, WTICZ is tlmay D1VXN that the Huntington Beach on will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the muntiegtoa beach Civic Center, 2000 Main street, Huntington teach. Califo:aia, an the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. 1. l9db planning Caaemil _ DATE�TIt�: �, Norc e-45, 19980 7 :00 PM : Code Amendmen t go . 114-2 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach LOCATION: Downtown area generally located along pacific Coast Highway between Coldenwest Street and beach boulevard C' (see attached map) . I . �. Downtown specific Plan � $EOUPS_: Revision to expand residential uses In Districts 2' 5a 4 sin the Downtown specific Plan and mi4or revisions in all districts which will create a more concise document. STATUS: Covered br Rnvironmental Impact Report No. s2-2. MUM sTAM: pursuant to Section 989. 9. 0 a Coastal Developesont Permit is not necessary with this application.-7*A. Coastal Cossaission will review the proposed changes . Qg`.,IrLS: A copy of the proposed request is on file In the Departisent of Comimunity Dpvelopnent , 2000 Hain Stt*gt, Huntington beach, California 92600, for inspeetioa bt the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to Interested parties at City Hall"SkheNain City Library, (7111 Talbott Avenuo)j aK ALL INTEW?sD PER i are iavited to attend said •heariaq and empress opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as Outlined above. It there are lay futtber questions lease call ft a' t Robert Franklin, Jaetaet planner at Sbi-5271 .P1 '� � Ahs Mike Adarss 1r • buntingtoa reach Plaming Carission �dllid��1 Ls t Sit it c rt as ,�tt jical l,y Qtatrics� � �, �t WFICE IS NENNY CIVU tMt the kviti#*ton beach Ci ty CwKI 1 w 11 hold public hearing In the Council Chamber at the Muntingtoa beach Civic Coster. 2000 Main Street. Muntingtom Beach, Cailrornla, t4 the date asd at the time Indicated below to receive trrd consider the stato nts of all persons who swish to be heard relative to the application described below. CIE: Monday. May 2. 19bd 7:00 P.M. SUL=: Code Amendment No. 86-3 MUM: City of Huntington leach : Downtowa area generally located along Pacific Coast highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard (see attached ./ � c UL , .._-% map). !� �r .: Revision to expand rosidential uses in Districts 3 and 4 1n the Dovintown Specific Plan and minor revisions In all districts which will create a more concise document, MUS: Covered by Environmental Impact Report ft. 82.2 Pursuant to Section 989.5.0 a C,easta4 Permit Is not necessary with this application. The California Coastal Commission will review the proposed changes CIN F1 E: A copy of the proposed requrs t is on file In the Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Hach. Caw 92646, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Mall or the Palo City Library, 7111 Talbert Avenue. ALL INTERESTED PERM are Invited to attend said hearsng and express opinlos or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any questionso please call &*art Franklin, Associate Planner at 536-Mil or the Office of the City Clark, 536-SEAS WLM i I NGT0N KA04 CITY COUNCIL � � I dy: Alicia MI. Wentworth ' City Clerk Phone (714) SW Dated 4/19/" ��i ti.A t }},i' r • Vs r i �'r Kam. ' CR mug immi Caltl. Obml*" ila�ial $1 Lam rill wive awth Cowt Dimariat t CA gum IWW Board of Balton i 10 8101 Slatdt 01 l rrlrt cMriNNUM smoke CR 17 Hurd Itan Newho a 926" Xm: Jwith li AWY w; Gold n atats Ililmhm p fth street1 11021 Pbpmd a Kvd. I'sirt4wtan Omedt. CA 92&W Ca:dm Gv ep CR 926U XM2 m" Dw i C/oDraw Building ArsY t Ar --O.C. Coo "Vsi L amf Omtffic 2N1 U. +tb Street 121. min Strwt Spa Am• CA : tiri.1 Reecho CA 92646 � 1�ta13� xotad+r 1112 a" �t�rt ttrrc 0 lty no. RAM 4001b0 0% 9"no NOW V49"m 40166 Ch 92i+li . ' Y VaSAw CR NW • . ... XMI ft. M ftem. QW91om. Lbr 1ft SON60 Cm Ill i s /li/� FALW �x1�tl�.es u� snail.. S�n:t�� 3 I fI CA112 st AM cts A i a) iOTICE IS NEREBY GIVEN that the Muhtlsgton Mach City Cowl wl11 hold public hearing is the Council Char at the Muntirlton b6ch Civic Conker. 2OW Main Streetq Munti ngto n Mach. California, on tine date AM at the tlot indicated below to receive and consider the statwrts of all persons Ao with to be heard relative to the application described below. OW: Wafty, May 2, 19" I1't: 7:00 P.M. iI 216m: Code Amendment No. dA-3 I City of Huntington Desch LOAM: Downtown area generally located al Wevard cific cast Nighway between Gol denwes i Street and ileac (see attached map) . M: Downtown Specific Plan Revision to expand residential uses 1n Districts 3 and 4 in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions In all districts which rill create a more concise dotnrmant SJADS: Covered by Environmental Igact Report No. U-2 L STAYS; Pursuant to Section 919.5.0 a Coastal Development Permit is not rie*^scary with titis applltatia. The California Coastal Commission will review the proposed charges BILE: A copy of the proposed request is on fife In the DepartUnt of Coruni ty Devel opmant. 2000 Main Street, Nunti ngton Mach California, 9r648. for inspectla by the publit. A copy of tt* staff report rill be available to interested parties at City Nall or the Main City library, 7111 Talbert Avenue. All tNTCKESM PCISCNS are invited to attend said heartn and express opisions or submit evidence for or against the application as 00TIned above. It there are any gwstions, please call Robert Franklin. Associate Planner at $363271 or the Office of the City Clark. 536-M MUNTIiIM REACH CITY COUNCIL ry: Alicia M. Meatworth ci ter cleft PhM t 11 d) 06- 03ted 411 tin ........tea �• •K (, • r �r�a ♦ �rr:. • 04 `•'• s rib m g]�J r ti f UJ i 01% AP Ad ' v r '. � l i t 1 ' t om r `M • t itmisp The %rip� �_ r Downtown S ecific Plan G� l p l . A H4 DA.. FUN T ram, TON BENC H PLANNING COMMISSION Aft 7"UESDAY, MUCH 8, 1998 J0I!4T STUDY SESSION-•RGARXIM (XWMISSTOM/CITY COUICIL 6 :00 PM - W" 8-0 (DOWNTOM S P'EC I F I C PLAN) (Dinner Served at 5: 30 PH) A.. Iarm Am PURPORE of www SPECIM PLAN ( 1) Goals and policies (2) Design Concept E. SPECIFIC PLAN C I RCULAT ION ( 1) Circulation Element Amendment 84- 1 ( 2) Precise Plan of Street Alignment e6-1 ( 3 ) Parking Structure Locations (4 ) Surface Parking Layout Analysis ( 5 ) Cu l" de••sac Locations at Numbered St rmets i ( 6) Bus utes C. PROPOSED REVISIONS W DZVEAPKt x r S'rAMARDS (SeGTIOk 4 .0) OF TNIS DOI�IIri'�O�MfM RPECI EIC PLAN C. PROPOSZD RILVISIOKS TO SPECIFIC PLAN CDNCNPT (SWTIOGS 1.0r 2 .0 AND 3 .0) OF THE SPZCIFIC PLAN E. PROKOW OKWWAMMIMTN=N TKN 0010101 a grWIFIC ( 1} Magi! F. SP'RCIAL TWIG ( 1) Revive diottict S to 100% Co ekcial (2) /i.nle Family Dwellings In district 0 HECITY OF i�i,iNTINGTON �A►CNC.'r1 ttL'-2GCOIJr�CII. - AOMINI,TFiATOR COAIMUNICATION To Mayor and City Council �►"orn Paul E. Coak, City Administ for Subiect DOWNTOWN REnEVELOPIAENT Date March 7. 1998 1 want to communicate to you my feelings about the type of project-t that are being presented to you and the Planning Commission for approval and whv, in my opinion, this type ot'development will secure the future of Main Street as a vibrant hest financi-.2v healthy busUess district. Although they were arrived at inde!rerx;ently by Halcyon. Ltd. of Sas, .-,:o, A real estate advisor and development consultant hired bti' Griffin Rr.,-tlty Cur. 't1 injunction with their Phase 11 project, the opinions contained in the attached exec% _ summary and preliminary recommendations from their retxtrt dated July 23, 1997. reflect my Opinions right .own the litre. Following are quotes from a few paragraphs of their report which particularly reflect the direction 1 feel we should be heading in the downtown area: "The only way to achieve a lo!,g lasting and systematic commercial revitaliration on Main Street is to anchor it with a significant residential neighborhood." also. "While difficult to quantify, a significant addition to the neig%Imt-hood would be certainly more than 500-600 households. 'Pith that level of infusion of new residents in the area, there will be enough 'older' people oRt the street to overcome the current 'hangout image' of the area." and, "We strongly recommend that Main Street be made into a two-wey traffic artery. This is essential to making the street more accessible to the substantial PCN traffic flows arul the contiguous neighborhooc:." fit Halcyon's report on pages 3 k 4. they recommend a two-threshold approach ror retail services on Main Street . The first threshold Includes basic needs such as a market, drug store, hardware store, and dry cleaner; none of which now exist. 'fhe second threshold includes restau�ants and theaters. A hotel is twit one of 0-=:'.r su"est.1 uses nor is it one 6f mine. My baths feeling is summarized in the following quote: "A t cot.• sizable and consistent household pgpulation base is required to turn the area into a legitirnaze residential neighborhood where people act.tally live and work, rather than being just a place to 'hang out and party.' " i have talked to few, if any, business people on Main Street who do not wholeheartedly agree with these concepts. Page -2- The idea of a tourist related Wain Street has been pursued for over twenty years by some commurtitiy leaders and city councils. I feel that the real reason this has not happened on Main Street is because it is not right for the area. The Southern California coast is covered with cities who are trying to attract tourists. Those with unusual and aestheticallypleasing taf igraphy such as Laguna Beach are somewhat successful. The Mast majority are not. In my opinion, establishing a goys of turning the downtown area Into a vibrant neighborhood such as Belmont Shores in Long Beach Is the realistic aternative and the one we should be pursuing. In order to provide, the necessary residential units in the downtown area, a reasonably high density is required because of the land values. However, th(- building heights being proposed are within the limits of the Downtown Specific Plan and, in the case of the Phase S Project, well below the allowable heights. Also, in order to implement the projects being proposed, revisions nee-J to be made to the Specific Plan since it was drafted around the 3D1 model. It should have been anticipated that some revWoru would be made to the Specific Plan as soon as development pr%x)sals were submitted. I would welcome any comments you may have as to my feelings on this matter. In order to move forward In a vigorous and efficient manner. it is imperative that the City Council, Planning Commission, ane staff work as a team in resolving the issues that will arise on downtown redevelopment. PEC:pf xc: Planning Commission Doug LaBelle Alike Adams Pat Spence- Attachment UUMNT WN PAYKIMGo TILAMSIT AND FINAMCINC STUDY Prepared for CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH Prepared Dv PAMSOMS BRINCKERHOFF QUAD: A DOUGLAS, INC. Amg stl 1905 CHAPTIR 1 PARKING YACIIITY t.00AMNS 'this Chapter includes diwomentatiun of a parking stMce inventory and peak period utilitAtion survey; projections of parking demand based on future 'ia+±d use; recommendations abnut Parking facility locations; and the possi'Ality of a shuttle systein for beach users, figure 7 illustrates tlee Downtown Huntington Beach Specific Plan Area. The Study Area has been subdivided in:o superblocks which were used as the basic unit of analysis. This consolidation of blockr, which is proposed by the City, Is intended to better serve the mixed use, larger settle development desired for downtown. I:XISIIMG CONDITIONS A detailed parking space inventory was conducted in mid-February, 1933 to o5tain information concerning Vie location, capacity and chrtractr.ristics of all (tie psrt6n facilities within the Study .area. Both on- and off-street (public and private) parking � spaces were included in the field survey. Since many o' the vacant dirt lots are used for parking by beaci;goers during the seasonal peak, their capecity was determined usin,v serial photo`raphs and dividing the lot area by a fA^.tor of M square feel per vehicle. Many of the dirt lots which are used for parkins are not legal according to City ordinances. Wowevcr, since they are used nonetheless these lots ore included ir. the inventory. The dirt lots are often the first locations to fill-up since there is nn chorge for parking. Off-street residential parking, and passenger mind co:,.merciq; loading zones were excluded from the survey. 'rhe resu;ts 3f this inventory are summarized in Table 1. Sp^crs ovith Volie limits cif two Doers or less are dcsibnated as short-term. The current issrking supply of the entire Study Area is 7,929 spaces. Of this total, 4,704 spaces. nr 33't, are lo:btr5 ►r. off-street parking fscilitie;; 1,903 51mccs, or 24%. .r-e to^.tited ill cur',s; --vith the rt nainin; 1,822 siaees, or :3%1 IDeated in dirt lot%. &.')out 59'a� of the off-street. spaces are in p.eblic lets; 3?", arc in privnte Ncititje%. Since tuning of this Study woald fiot per,rit *,!ir peak %elis(in. All off peek .eason maximium parking accumulation survey ^a-, conducted to esta'Als"t exiMin„ p.rking utilip.0on dt least for that time of year. Aitli)urli par'%m- tk nan.: during the off-sens:m is not comparable to the sum ner ,wa'i dtrnond in downtown Huntington peach, information about the existinZ demand is u%vful !or prvvidity a realistic parking structure imp:emtntation phttsi%v elan. The mceu r+ulletioei survey «a-6 perfoY.ned on Wednesday and Thursday, febroary 13-4449 ;pd5, between II:H noon err►d 2:00 P.M., in the core area, to capture the peak vtm�Llnul.stion at retell smirker%. Parked vehicles in the re%Ginirg &roast which are mainly used for parking by beach- goers., were counted between I2:00 noon end 4:00 P.M., since glue to the tinupially weather, during the week when the surveys were conducted, it larT* number of pule were using the p.sAing facilities during that time prrlod. Tile x suemselses Ute compa4sm of parked "Melts to the number of parkiq thew by block sad by type of $pe so repruenwd by 0% pemot of spaces oreu,pWd by pWked vohielft NOW of VW dirt Iota Wert wad far parlr in j dur i n j tho sur trt y, but '•{ t '1 ���/ ,=�•� ;,mot� �� �:� �s . wm � � + a�aaaflC����Ir ► . � �' . � . � � � � (DIEU[111[DID Kfl M, RINI MIE-L: �a _ 4 I M :-J a , • A ........... T - U J,v It= 1 r• ` � AND FINANCING STUDY F'�• HUt�TING7GN BEACH PA;r3l�fhfG, TRANSIT, _ D nations .,� Study Area Black e g TABLE 1 DOWNTOWN 1113N97NGT41; BEACH St1MMAI;T Of P•RKING INVENTORY OFFSTREVT CURB TOTALS Pwmie Private 71"mic Vitt Curb 1lrmet rmd Metered ftirete Unme%ered Metered subtotal 1wW 8 ort l.oft- lebtetal 4 - 91wt- Lcm- Short- ' 7tirwt TwwN Term Tenw Term Term Tom A - 77 77 - 88 11 - - 99 175 B - - - 09 99 199 111 J2 - - 146 434 c - 71 ?3 144 - 36 - - 45 84 229 o - - - 44 84 - 19 20 - 13 44 129 E - - - 54 64 - 31 - - 55 as ISO IF - - - 95 95 - - 2 - 43 43 140 l} - - 13 13 - 34 - 30 84 149 lot lot) 1"(2) _ - 198 - - - 21 - 2 i 212 34 - - - 34 34 P} 262(2) - 397 679 - - - 73 - 79 759 R - - - 30 80 - - - 42 - 42 122 Lw - - - 61; GG 79 - - 7 79 86 231 M 11 - 105 122 - 5 4 - 47 56 176 - 41 -41 44 96 - 0 - 10 192 c)(?) - - - t0 to 189 70 - 13 - As - 292 Ipm 25 25 147 97 - 15 - 112• 284 VQ1A 1 - 7 7 374 1 10G - 14 - 11,69 498 26 26 294 95 - 20 - 115 435 509 32 - 14 - 206 615 - - - - - 170 - 170 170 U(1) 313(2) 239 77 629 24 - 34 663 Y'il) 1 .745 - - - 1 ,745 - - - 36 - 86 1 ,831 TOW mwk e#apme 2.50 7? 139 19239 4.204 10 622 912 6! SS4 m 1.903 f.m lbl0il�8 of TOW 32% 1% 1% 17% S3% 23% 12% Is 7% 5% 24% is" 17few lmrking 1'xiny. � �al lwrr<i�v k}1. TABLE 2 DOWNTOWK HUNTINGTON BLACK PEAK ACCUMULATION OF PARKED VE111CLB.S OFP-PEAK SEA30N OIFP-R'l MET PUBLIC ONE-OTRSBT PRIVATE CURB TOTAL 3b* Aeewwktim Owwvpwwy Aeewaulatian Oeewponey Accumulation aecuptney Aecamulstion Oeewpene3 A - - 11 14% 22 2?.% 33 19% B - - 29 2914 SG 38% as 23% C S9 7U'+6 40 5511b 36 43% 120; 55,16 33 3916 28 52% 51 E - - 40 67% 6l 71,16 101 6716 F - , - 62 65% 37 82% 99 11116 G - - 3 23'x, 51 34% 54 34% - - 14 67`lb 14 6% - - 146 3 7,t 1 1`16 147 19'1b K - - 41 St 4 10'b 45 37 % L - - 53 8016 74 86`6 127 55% IR 17 100'16 62 59-C 52 131 74 4 !+ - - 13 37% 53 SU'4< 6E 349.% 0 - - 1 10% .119 47116 40 14% t - - 2 3WT. 48 43` 57 20'40 - - t 1411f. 30 25,16 31 6-1b R - - 14 541, 20 1716 34 V6 S - - - - 13 17% 16 3% 59 56% 99 58% U 13? 25*6 67 87•-t 21 62.6 227 34% v 229 1711b - - 3"- 37'16 321 19% TWO 4!S 11% i25 47% Tss 42% 1.91E 24% fielp-4 -sa N-k1 oirtervii 1 i w� r•-ecir-le-1 on 1'vlw»it j 11 ptad 11. 1 IK's E � � their capacities were Included in the caiculntion of the total cw upancy peretntages. During the period of high"t parkin` Accuirulation, 1,916 vehdcles were parked in downtuwn Huntington Desch occupying 24% of the overall parking spaces. Although this supports that overall there is a large parking &%;.,plus for the off-peak season, a close examination of Table 2 indicates the existence of very high eccupanc,y rate% at some of the blocks, such as Blocks 01" and "M". It should be also noted that parking facilities should not be expected to attain 100% occupancy. Off-street perking, facilities are considered effectively Pull at 85% of actual capacity and curb-side parkin; at 94%. This accounts for vehicles maneuvering into and out of spaces, vehicles circulating in search of an empty space, some vehicles taking more than one Stull, ;workers unawarenc is wl ?re all the vacant spices are, etc. PARKING DEMAND PROJECTIONS Decauce of its beachside location, the parkin, situation in downtown Huntington 3each differs significantly between peak and off-peak seasons. Therefore the sources of demand for parking in downtown Huntington Beach were divided into two groups to facilitate the forecasting task. The first Sro-6p consists of the proposed developT,-�nts throughout the Study Arc& which would replace most of the existing buildings if implemented. The second group is mainly the beach users who create a reli tively large but only a seasonal demand. This section r)rie:fly describes the steps followe-i iA estimating future parking demand in downtown Huntington Beech for each of, these ;roups separately. Mwrrtowri Devellaprnant Demand Projection f future parking demand for downtown devetop.nent are 5asrdj on anticipated :end use changes and siveific develoa.nent projects identified by the City. Two sets of parking de-nand estimates were developed. The f Vst set is base:: on the City's zoning code of parking requirements, except for the proposed "Seaport village" whi-;h will require significantly more spaces than typical co-nmercinl uses. A second :ct of parking demand projections oere developed based on the nore r-dlistic nssu;nptiown that perking facilities are more efficiently utilized when n group of different land uses share a parking facility. With the exception of residential anf; hots:l uses which nerd to have their separate parking sipply throughout the (4ay, to develop the alternative foreenst the City code require nents oere reduced by :0'b to reflect tlix inured use in the core area and other economics of icale which occur in at downtown. Based upon the assumed Specifi= Plan land uses shown in Table 1, i e51es 4, and 5 show the pari ini; demand projections, by Mock Arid Irind use. A1s can tw seen. since close to 75% of that proposed parking will serve residential avid hotel de n&nds, a reduction of only about 4Ifn spdces in the downtown core is proposed. Hooeh Seasonal Denaaaad Two difffrvnt approaches were used to e-stimate parkini generated by beaehagoers. First. revrdless of the anticipated land uie changes in the Study kreA, ono assuming that She er fisting number of 50,000 drily beach users is thq effective capaelty of the City be ch 09 and based on an 83% automobile mode splltUP9 a vthicl1i occupawy rate U. We- 11, and a peak psrking accumulation factor of $0 percent of daily vehicles, the pea►, weekend parking demand is estimated to be *bout $0450 spaces. TAMA 3 PROPOSED LAND USP3 IN DOWNTt 01" SPECIPIC PLAN(t' Residential Commercial Rcstswant Dfrwe Institutional (Dwelling) Hotel (M (004 Z1300 (000 "Creational HI Units) (Rooms 3 . Pe.) . Ptr 3 Pt.) ..F, Q Acres A 100 - (Existint) 0 275 - 71 - 45 - - C 28 - 19 - 50 - - D 27 - 19 - - - £ 27 - 19 - Sp - F 27 19 - - - C ISO II 7010 - - - - - 1 Sri'. - - - - I J - 400 IO A - 13 401 600 20 16 - - - Vi 200 257 30 :S - N 150 - 10 - - - 9 100 - - p 1S9 - - - - - Q 1S0 -it 11, 30 - 10 • - - S 10f - 20 - - - - T 100 - - - (Existin0) s0 - v TWO!, 3o330 166" 332 36 1,14 1111 i! (1 )The propaoad lend uses are "mied upon on ritirnslie of the likely t;eeclopment to occur by "build out" of the fpeolfic Pion. (!)&w Figure 7 for block deaidnatime. I I TAItI-P. 3 PROPOSED LAND U310 IN DOWNTOWN S @CIFIC Pt.AN(1) ?4-sidenlinl Commercial Rratsurcnt Orfice Wtituti-mal (DoulUng) liatel (009 (000 (000 ;M Recreational iH�) Un1u) (ocm�*) ,•,_,_ . FL) ._S it..) - 33:..Ftom) 'q!�) Aems) I A - (Existiq) D 275 71 - 45 C 28 - i`3 - 30 - D 27 - 19 - - E 27 - 19 - 50 - t: 27 - 19 - - - G I50 - - - - - 900 - ,3 - 400 10 L - 600 20 1F - - - 200 230 30 - '_, 13v - 10 - - - - 0 100 - - - - Q 130 - 10 tt 13 u - 10 s too - 20 - - - T 100 (E.xistin�) U - - 75 J: - Y - .. .u- Total 30334 l em »x sd 17d tl if The propawd land um% sre Used upon an &itiln,ite of the likely daralop-ntnt to oceur by "boiid ait" or thv SWItle plan. (_)us r*vre 7 rw blok d i tiat . .L� J TASLlt d DOWNTOWN HUNT1MOTOR BXACH ESTIMATED FUTURE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PARKIwC DRUAND") Based On City CcIde ReVirements k 1Res0entiel llotel Commercial Restaurant Office Institut oval Reereativnal Total Ij 619 - 355 - 149 - - 1j1 ;3 i �l S I - IS 5 ` - - - 159 i E 61 - ?5 - 165 - - 3:1 F 61 - 95 - -- - ` �31 338 11 1 ,5"5 - - - - - - • II :,025 - - - - - - 2► 0 5 - 440 50 80 - - 40 610 6G0 IOU 160 - - - : 2 0 VI 4:10 275 150 - 53 r - - ` 5 .r M 338 n 225 - - is 136 13-S . 0 - _ - 333 3:18 - 30 ^' 5 - Intl iml 71, 02 1 aIn 20035 $go $61 222 40 12073!. !K'tAt r tat 59% 14% 16% 4% 5% 2% - 10y 6 %%tionatrd Acinand .0bown is escloisivn or beach porkiV demand. da(Wcts a hipw demarA thin h4pired by City Code to attest the jaigne nitwo of ow pr eed bn kWoea r TABLIE S DOKMIT VM HUNTINGTON IlRACH RR'ii i UKTRD FU"R9 DOWNTOWN Dl VU01'MRN'T PARKING IDEMAND(l) Senectln< Sail Min" use fiction I Block Roeaidontial Hot*? Ct.MMQPCW WNUUM'081 Ofrkro InoUtaUa+a1. ltoohstlo al Tatsk .4 225 - - - - 17 - 242 p 619 - 235 - 117 - 10021 C 63 - 75 - :'0 - - 268 D 61 - 75 - - - - 136 E 61 - 75 - 130 - :66 17 6i - 75 - - - - 136 G 338 - - - - - - 338 H 1 , 5?5 _ - - - 1 ,5 I 20025 - _ - - - - : ,0:� J - 440 40 S - - 32 576 K - 440 - - - - 4 :J L • 660 8o 128 - - • 8F M ASO 275 120 - 65 N 338 - 40 - - O 223 - - - - 225 P 338 Q 338 - 50 - - 38� R 338 - 50 - - - 385 5 225 - 100 - - - 32; T 225 - - - - - V - - 750�:) 3:0(2) - 1100 - 1 . 270 v Total 71502 l,l1S 19SIS Sit 442 217 32 1203d3 Poet of Total •t l* 15% 15% i% 3% 2Th - 1 M 9twm numbits ref tct 20% redwtion from the City *ode roquire-nents due to egweted mixed we of parking qmeee In the oofe woos with tiro sweption of Pm4drentiol rlyd hotel pat tcixg. AMN the aetimotad demand "we Is onekwiae or beach parking demiurd. RetWou a hWw Ranted then re pWW by the City Code to rerteet On r nkpo wtwe or pfred dr�rek+�+r�1t. The ex;;ting parking supply was used as a sceaad method of deterinU►ing t►Mears, beech demand, according to a survey conducted by the City, 971S of all parking spaces In the Study Area are occupied most of the clay during the peak season. (Curb parking by beachgoers also occurs in the residenciod area north-wast of duwntown, but this practice will likely continue after the land use changes crer r in the downtown area, unless some form of contra' measures are introduced). This inethod results in a peak parking demand estimate of abut $9900 spaces for beach-goers, when it is assumed that 9716 of the overall downtown parking supply available for beaO.I;oers (i.e., excluding private and short-term spaces) is occupied by beachgoers at its peak. The average of the results of the two methods used, or about 6,000 spaces is considered to be a reasonable estimate of the future parking demand for the users of the City's teach on peak weekends (i.e., Memorial Day, Fourth of July, and labor Day weekends). Based on counts conducted by the City and State, teach attendance and parking demands on typledl weekends is about two-thirds of the Fe^*�: weekend demand. This indicates a demand b; beachgoers for around 6,000 spares on a typical weekend. On I'l-9 days out of the year (i.e., the peak weekends of Memorial Day, Fourth of July, and labor flay if there is good weather) the demand will be for 6,000 spaces. PARKINC FACILITY LOCATIONS In order to meet the projected parking demand of prop )%ed Downtown development ai well ns t1w estimated parking demand of beachgoers, several alternative solutihns were developed. Candidate sites for major new parking facilities have been identified and discussed with City staff. This section describes the metlhodology useti to identify alternative sites, the criteria used to evaluate the sites, and the recommended plan resulting from the analysis. M e u►odology The general concept for the future build-out of downtown Luntinnon Beach, ar envisicmed by City staff, was used as the basis of the analysis. Downtown 1{6ii;tineton Beach is expected to becorne a major activity center in the region, providing a variet% or shoppirg, dining and recreational opportunities to visitors, as well as the res►dent% of the irr mediate neighberhoods. The majority of the cult,umers and visitor's are anticipated to visit :nuitiple destinations for different purpo%ti. all of which will bt provided within c^mvenient walking distance in the downtown Core. The proJXMd development includes a "Seaport Village" type develtor.-nent ot, the beach site or, Pacific Coast Itioway. 11m degree of eonvenienc2 that people tend to associate with walking distances between parkin` and their destination depends largely on the attrac:lvenv- of their deestinations. In other words, the mote attractive their destination(s), the lerVer the ce1 ty sea M IM r mainlng IS% includes about 3% transit and 12% walking and bicycling. R (9) Sewft: Coaretal 4acros Amlysis in ..allforniat An AsusameRt of Remaitim TCeaspertaUM Analysls is Cawlal PI&MIngi Janes L Surkel 2mareh Uport distance they are willing to walk ftorn their place of parking ire.g., L gme 8eaeh, W*Awootl Vill1age, downtown La Jodi, etc.). 16%4 on the above-in end coed concept at downtown Huntington Beam, the degree d tolorance (or walking from parldng to nretaiVM11'n&rcial dOPUMtions is expected to be quite highg at least in the downtown Cora. For resi den ti al, hotel, and general co y m erv:1 a) urea parking is reeom rn ended to � be at-sttce. For restaurant uses, speciality retail, gwwral retaU along Main atreet, and office mat it is proposed that Same paridrq be permitted off-site in "shared" facilities. Therse shared fsc-- -ties would be parking structures or lots aysilabie to the genwrel public, built to serve s nurntser of different users in the immediate ova. wif.h the at*ve in i .nci � i n t n e t'3Uow ng genera! (arainrter3 acre used for losabng park,rg within the Uowntuwn Specific Plan Arrr:(D itasidential. All parkinf should be on site; witn 85% of each urdtz parking no more than 200 feet f tiro the dweWng unit; and the rei-naining parking (for visitors) within 400 feet of each unit. It should be the responsibility of each developer to provide their own parking. s Hotel. All hotel guest parking shall be orb-site and no more than 200 feet walkdn' distance ,� dt ence from any roan. Partigrlg for nnrngary facilities 'L and e:nploy�ee parlang in the downtown Core , may to W-31te, including in shared facilities, but no more than 600 feet fronn the parking generator. • Comneem- al. Except along :Hain Street between Pacific Coast High-ray and OrNnge Avenue, parking for general and convenience retail should be on-site and within 400 fret of the parking generator. Parking for specialty retail in the downtown and for general and eonverwenee retail altm., dainn Street between PCH and Uranp Avenue, can be off-site in a shared parking facility up to 600 feet from the generator. • Restaurant. Parking for restaurants can be o!f-site in shared facilities up to 600 feet from the generator. a Office. Parking for cffict% can De off-site in shared facilities up !o 600 feet iron thy. generator. EVALUA71011 OF ALTERNATIVES Several alternative plans were developed and different candidate parting structure locatiom were nd n c e t f,ed � ed on the rbove mentioned pwra-nettts. the major differences between the alternativrs is in the downtown 'Core where shared public parking structures can be provided in a variety one ways. The ,Hain factors which ware comidered in locating candidate pacing structure sites are: (1)('toose eritens are rwjot cwresiUy p"rt of the ;:it 's Code. ttlourniariw at the downtown Con cre PCH, South Street, cxange Avenue, arA Lake S treat. •- i I I • tNrtlti c� et��►ver►i rt►cti.• f ru.►► pry rki rt� l�� ekr,ti rwf��►n , e h►ie�rrs"IKir►g duri�►luwrrtxn�rral whicirinr traf frc t�► fon.• ��►l��ri raj tfw t`+ert• Mrs►. • �riN iiirriiyf lrKf[t� c�npst•1�+. � • Ntinionizing irnpbcts on sl)aeent uses/neighborhuad disruptian. • Minirnizirj land ftcqui,siticWasse ably costs, • Efficiency of prrl,ing structures based on parcel configuration. 1 + Parker Wet,y ar d security, After detaile%-: analysm of s number of alternatives, two were selected as tht post � viable ones. These n1ternativees are presented below. The first Alteniative Plan is depleted in Figure 6. Lake Street, AUanta Avenue, Pacific Coast Highway, Walnut Avenue and .Sixth Street gill be the .-nain access routes to the downt•jwn Core in the future. Thus the shared public structures whieh would mainly serve off►ec and commercial Loss are shorn positioned at the periphery of the cur.. at gateways in such a way as to ►nt_ rcept in-coinrng traffic. The locat:om► Nod cApecity of each propoied parking (acitity is shown in Figure 0. Free total number of spacci r-equi rest for each Wock is provided on the same dock (on-site), except for Blocks "V', "t", "L" and "M", -• the bunted for which is sere Orrsitr, N grid/or by the four �btic structures proposed in Blacks ry C , RE" "and VN.`l/ These rldn structures would ':r stared fadlities mainly sere � i y ft olCiee and rornrrrcial uses. They would be 3-4 levels, about 20.30 feet high, standard two-bsy st4dvpred floor or sloped floor garages with about 300 parting spaces each. Moough Vie f oar public p►rldng structures would be most sa tathly posi ti zioet! at the ,!xtresne endii of the core area for capturing, in-coming traffic, -noit of the parldng de:nand Dity would serve o:-iginates from the c,•o;nmerciai land was along Main Street. The distance of these structures from ,Hain Street (over 400 feet for the Sixth Street structures and close to $00 feet for the Lake Street structures) would likely :* vv.- Wel tits excessive by many parkeru. Also, having thasz %tructures faciriz Sixth Street anc Lake Street could create visual problems for its►dents ,across the street !ro n these strwetures. With the exception of the la•:stion of these public structures the Alternstive Plan is s4mllter to the Hecummended Plan which is described in Me neit: s sc ti on. i i UCOMMENUEA PLAN Th* tteco-nineftled Plan, as illustrated in Figure !, provides a good balance between Naliang eanvemence and traffic aeceisioility, as well as reduces the visual impacts to rftiMmUsl land uses. The four public strictures inentioned shave (locatad in glo+:ws "U*i 06" and *%r) w0wild be ant-half to a full bloek d caer to the Arvin 31reet ads, yet IMM'k dolig rtl are simian in Eipm 7. -,'i �I°. ?�. � ,'r.•'`.. � ,- 1 17 L—d ?tsT3i1 smmri- jj .{ 1 ITY r'�- -'��-'1�. :�i_ '���_1�_ �R ! 1�r�i - �2M*a' 1w - 44Q 4 a N lit 000C ►M Iwo So""Q"%"J CAmmwlWSW HUNTINGTON BEACH PARKMG, TRANSIT, AND FINANCING STUDY Fiji * Parking Locations $ ��#A %W ALTERNATIVE PLAN now L F -A L91i uj ' 973a f' - lif ..�" 130C 22"1 saw s lQQC O00C MA C w�wo�ta•.r.r j00m powee.PW%Me t«."I HUNTINGTON BEACH PARKING, TRANSIT, AND FINANC#NG STUDY p4we "AN� age am I Parking Locations 9 Nun»....._=. RECOMMENDED PLAIT! wwild .till iw Close to the periphery of the downtown Core. The vivial problems mentioned carticr would Ise eliininoted by poiitioniog the t No strocturci on the west .i& of Maiii Street Ix:tween other land uw-s, nvtd loeatin„ 11K.' two eA;lerly structures ,mi two .1ifferent sidics of nInek Vchirulpir treric kurreit and e;,rest problem% wmilil !ie niniinired by distrilwting the tolnl nrfice/roinmercinl lArking dernand, and re-mitmit -ramie generation into reLitively sin.-ill oructurec oriented to different Minionizin; land hcdiiisiti.)n t.ind Rssetnbly cots is another objective well met by the Recommended Pinn. As shown in Figure 10 the two public structures Nest of Hain Street world occur between the easterly edge of the north-south alley and approri- ,n►stely the edge of the westerly sidewalk of Fifth Street. Fifth Street which is eventually proposed to be closed in the Core, would be reduce! by 10_ feet to provide for the parking structures and sidewalk. (A typical two bay, gdrage with 900 parkinq is 124-128 feet wide; whereas the present dimension between the alley and Fifth Street, 6;ht-of-way is 115 feet. This would allow the propperty owners east of rifth Street to e:)nlinue using Fifth Street for access to !heir properties, as well as 7natntein alley access ror the properties west of the alley after the parking structures are built. The two public structures cast of Main Street would Se posi ti )ned in the north-west i:id sw-th-west corners of Chock "G". To maintain a "vie n corridor" along Second Street, the Oructures will have to be shorter than the Fifth Street gara+es and An iidditi-)n i! level provided; or the strictures mould have to he rotated 90 degrees !to be similar to whet is prulwscd on Fifth Strect). 411 fryer o.ructures would have retail :,wace art, th .rou,n1i floor racing the public streets. T1ie retail space would ti%vt an averRgr >>;►:'� of rpproxim►stely rU feet, :o th-it the ground floor could Also occommod4tc iyrkin; an : vehicular ramping to-ond-from the un,kr levels. Therc would 5C ahout 1 a,00h .Junrf-, feet nr retail in the bnrb;c fronting on OranJe %venue and in the g&rugc fr,:nt+,l,; Dra W►ilntit N►4eniw, and Approximately 18,000 square feet of retail spice in ehch of the two gAruges fronliiug on rirc, Street. ,s t'x,iIMined in the previous section the two parking struetures on the rest will 112vr three-levels and the two on the cast four levels, with each +arege contai�iing, npprorimately 300 sp.iccs. With an approximate -; -y height or nine to ten feet and an uncovered upper flonr, the structures would b^ the heiihl of a regular onc•rin.i-n- half story to two story building, thus; reducing visual inpacts. These roir ,util. fnr_ilitics will not only provide the parking; for ell land uses of Blocks "L", "F'V, but t'iey also -will ;crve so.ne of the joirkinb demand nf t3loc4 "N1" (266 siwei) u-1: Mock "L" 0 86 spaces). The tw.i public Str,JctUrei 1,kroposed on the two sidei or the peer and or ►�lci 'i roast Ifighway w.-mIJ lie two-level parkin; str,icUre: %Vc:e-ring; under Me "�•M,»•t Village", and would 'se Isrpe enaueh to :neat the entir? ?arsine demand of the "Soap art j The pJ!Aic parking facility in alocK "J" could ')e a sir!a:�: I lot serving the commerciAl recreation facilities. The small public partying west of Block " N" it, a small sirface lot that will serve the public l6rsry. 1 Riinated demand for approximately 1,270 spaces is »t Isased upon the %ity of llontirVion Beach parkins cc4e. Experience at other shoiltr Seiaport VNISS9 dovelop,%*Pts sutst that ;mr�kind spate ejernands wilt likely bt 9?*Ottr than would be provided for "nB the CltO rode. Are Itri•t 14 i`1:truif1= Win M. M waM . .__ LJ Fi I J iLl -1 _ I 1Li1 -- - --A -=__= 106 RROPOSr--n S11AR. F-D PARKING STIV 1CTURE SITES Eigme 10 i 4611 of the parking designated as private in Figure 9 could he provided either In parking structIM" Nelow or alcnglide and In conjunction with the residential or hotel biiil-•Rings), or they could be in surfecr lots. Certainly in the case of blocks such as "M" and "L", which are PrVosed to have high density develop-nent, Vii face lots would not be ressible, But some of the other blocks with residential uses could have, at least part of, their parking provided in surface lots. This will depend on the type and design of the residential units. In the rase of Block! IN". "Q", "R", and "S" provisions could be made for the cointnercial public parkin] within the private facilities or the corresponding block. Aminioofi most or the existirj curb ptirkinj spaces will Ae eliminated in the future Along VII and other princiohl tryrric arteries in the Study Vea to achieve hightr level-, of service for the ,noveinent of vehicular .and pedestrian traffic, the remainin; cure SpKces can he utili•rell to supple•nent the supply of the recommended parking facilities. 1:1 -)rder for the proposc i rAciliti( ; to ')r. successful, nnrticu:arly durinv peak se•isons, diffcreiit level. and types of parking control strategies will need to be iniple nentel. 'I'1lrse include lime restrictions, validation programs, Pind access control strste jie, such ai card-key gates and/or manned facilities, BEACH SEA tsNAL SPARKING PLAN 'Me proposed development for downtown Iluntington Deitch will not only parking for the new lsnd uiei, but will res-At in the loss of -nNny existing parkin; lots and vacant ifirt lot: which are currently ,,k.,j for parkin- by' beachgoers duro, t'►e ;ices; season. (Ninny or the dirt lots Ix-ins; uv.d by beachgoers are not legal p+"king lots). Of the cristino seasonal lMrkin„ lot, that are mainly used ay beach-goer,, shout 1,850 simces will heleft for their uie These space are located south-cut of the ')ie.. Along Paeiric Coast I{ighway. In addition to these existing lot% the Downtown Speci,,c f laci allows for parkin; to be constructed along the ocean side of FCH. This parkin] cannot he visible rro•n the highway. Willi the drop in elevation rrom PCH to the beach it Mptienm theft it would be possible to construct two level parking strijetures no;th of the purr. Decaucr. of the seasonal nature of the parking deco&nd generated by bedchgoers, however, cost: of providing plrkint; structures that will only be used, at .Host, fo�jr months out of the year is not jt!stiftable. For the same reasons, addin.; to the side of the propo;nl shared use garage in the downtown Core to serve the highly scai,onal, .and largely weekend beach demand is not practical. This is when a wisonat shuttle bus or tram service °Mild toe initru►nental in connectin- eructing re-hott pdrkinj lot; to the beach area. Fiture l i depicts 4overal l'oolential evicting parking Ints, lusted within a lftr;e rddiui of the downtown, *Ihich might be considered for use as re-note lots in conjure tion with a shuttle service to meet beachgoer3 parking demands. Considering tat failure or 4 shuttle system which w,ss implemented a few yetis ago, for the same parposs using the pmrkini; facilities of the Golden West Colic.,* suggests that sites within a much sin•slls.— radius should to considered. In consultation with City staff, a elaicll sit.wttd grou,,p of existinj porkinj and vacant lots were identified that presont It viabit alternMtive to building new barking racilitias to +erve a portion or the highly seasoml twach de-nsw. �11 of the parking designate 4 as private in Figure ! could he prwided either in parking structures ('glow at Owlside and in conjunction with the residential or hobat ballelings), or they could be in surface lots. Certainly in the case of blo-ks such as "N" and "L", which are proposed to have high density development, %sirfaee lot$ would not tot feasible. But some of the other blocks with residential uses could havo, at least part o(, their parking }provided in surface lots. This will depend on "-' :ypt and .ltsip of the residential units. in the case of Blocks �V", "Q "R", and "S" provisioons could be made 'or the commercial public parking within the private facilities of the corrt"ndinw block. Aithou;h most of the existinj curb pearkinj spaces niiil he chminated in the rwtxt "long ;rlI and other princit-wl tr-aria arteries in the Study Area to achieve hightr hovel~ of service for the movement nf vehicular and pedestrian traffic, the remainin. i curh spaces can he utili(.-d to suphle•nent the supply of the recommended perking facilities. in order for the proposed f+scilitic, to ')c tiuccessful, p-nrticulsrly during peak 3c:isnns, different levels and tylms of parking control strategies will need to be ample nei-itel. '('Mess ImAude tune restrictions, validation programs, and access :ontrol strytegiv, such a:: card-key gates and/or manned facilities. BEACH SEASONAL PARKING PLAN 11m proposed develo,)lnent for downtown fluntiniton Dench wit, not only r^quir- parking for the new land uif!s, but will res-ill in the loss of many exir,ing parkin- lots and vitchnt dirt lots which are currently -ist-d for parking by beachgoers duriitj th-� peak se ison. (Many of the dirt lots txsing used by beschgocrs are not legal pwr,;ng 'r lot•). 4f the existing seasonal I-Arkina lots that are mainly uu-d ay beach-Soers, .0011t 1,1:it1 sp4ces will be left for their us+--. P.ic%e space ere located south-east of the pi,." along Pacific Coast highway. In additirin to these existin.; lots the Downtown Speci!v! Plon allows for parking to be constructed alone the ocean sitie of PCH. This parking cannot he visible fro-r the highway. With the drop in elevation front PCI1 to the yrsch it apyeears thmi it would rc possible to construct two level ,narking striictires north o: the pier. Decau%e of the seasonal nature of the parking demand generated by beachgoors. howc-er, cast: of providing psrkint; structures that will only be used, at ,cost, frnir months out (,of the year is not justiftible. For the same reesons, addini to the size of the Vopo;al shared use garage ire the downtown Core to serve the hi;hl), scaianal, :Ind largely weekend beach dr,ndnd is not practice. This is Nhen a shuttle bus .3r tram service could be in,41ru-nental in connecting re-tiote parking lot; to the beach area. Figure 1 a depic•t3 ;vveral potential esisting parking lets, located within a lKr;e radiu% of the downtown, #this' miZht be considered for use as re,note lots in corlunctiun 'rith •c shuttle "rvice to meet beachgoers perking demands. C nnsidRring the failure of A shuttle syste,tn which wys implemented a few yasrs ago, for the sa:ne purpwe wing 11W parking facilities of the Golden West Colle,"o suggasts that site; within a much sin,sik• radiwx should be eonsidered. in consultation with City staff. is clonely sit.wttd Lroa.) of existinj parkIrtj and vacant rots were identified that present a viobift altornative to WiWift new parking facilities to rervt a portion of the hi�Mly w4sonal beach do,w%L U illustrated in Figure 11, Mil or these lots are locntrd mcar the civic Conter and awrrxt or the following: a civic Center 290 spacwc 0 Huntington Bea^h High Schuol 629 spaces a Sea Cliff Office Park 77' ,.,,tees TUTA1. IT Even thoaih the rerncte Narking program may not be needed for some years to Comte b.t. e)ostirq airface lots witl;in the downtown can continue to ne seed until they are actually Milt upon), In order to have o successful and perrnan,snt remote pa,rldng pr-grsin in the future appropriate step; need to be taken by the City now to assure the permanvot availability of the remote parking sites. Another parking supply source that can be utllized to meet the beach-sewonal dean end during the w;,ekends is the approximAtely 440 spaces that have been allocated to futwt office employees in the pubiie parking structures. The roan-Inder of the bench porkirig demand is expected to be rnet by parking providod by private entrepreneurs who would Karst to make an interim toe of .heir vacant lats, Rs well as by the parking lets in 4hc Suitt Beaches of Huntington and Horse Ctuca WmV Pacific Coast Highway. The Ldnvc-inentioned remote parking locntiorm suggest a shuttle route. along Lake Street, its well us Clang Pacific Coast Highway Ntuch woad connect all the remote purkiiK lots to the City's Besen and to the downtown co. mere-ial co,*. The shuttle system is ,addmmed in more detail in Chapter Ill. i +►t mre.�r+L rL,►1 COLL401 AGO" �M1�MrLiR c4wT4*►!M+ �nw�t� Ave WARWrl AK QG .M it ram• wiy, fC1/pt��jR0 IUD ►Q�/MTA•1 vKIRV RT+�.o 0«u«TNtt TAUKPT _AVE ram, e mot/ M R CM L+►v0 cIT f O M ►C�LDr.OIR ft+�TDO M'rN � � 1 Z ♦N LKLfA C"CA t! Tt `t , GAAl�[t0 AVQ • 16 WII O tGwcTOwa AVE. ' L,Cw`+w .;La. ,iTIt r M.111•rQ T ok K di C M I wm �rOn h.i11>Q f to �tUtt� w1rlA+rC �+Mt��+O S ,� .•i fit pS/1Tl.11�ef0 � r � *' � " ADAIMS AVt �� '.� % ` .6top0ou %.r 1� • r �wr f fTuC• A04A Y I = ATLAIeTA IM ,►►'� All v { L MLta WWWO LITT 04&C►.lifa0 . Pacik Ocean . -umf nvoll flays L ATI" FOR BEACH 1 a ftmw .�am Im MwiTi %ef rwfiaA "Yet CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT 84- 1 JUNE 1984 Negative Declaration 84-m- 14 �� IKntinpron bsaen P� O �0^ 11 1 led RE:30LUTION NO. S385 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL Or THE CITY 0! HUNTINGTON BEAC1: ADOPTING CIRCULATION ELElIENT AMEND14ENT NO . 84-1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN, CHANOINO DESIGNATIONS OF PORTIONS OF ORANGE AVENUE, LAXE STREET, ATLANT.! AVENUE, WALNUT AVENUE, rIP'TI{ STREET AND SIXTH STREET WHEREAS, the City Council, or the City of Huntington beach I desires to upd`te and refine the General Plan in steeping with ' changing community needs n:,d objectives ; and A public hearing on adoption or Circulation Element Amendment No. 84-1 to the General Plan was duly held by the I' Planning Commission on May 15 , 1984 , and approved for reco mren- dation to the City Council ; and After giving notice as pre :!crlbed by Governymnt Code sec- tion 65355 , the City Council held at, least one public hearing to 04 cons=der said CirculaL• Son Element Amendment No. 84;1 ; and At said hearing before. the City Council , all per. dons de- siring to be heard on said amendment were heard , NOW, THERLPARE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , pursuant to provisions of 'title 7r Chapter 3 , Article 6 or the California 0overnraent Codes covo*nc ing with section 65350 , that Circulation Element Amendment Mo. 84-1 to the General Plan , consisting of the following changes, is hereby adopted : 1. Redesignation or Orange Avenue from a secondary to a primary arterial between !sixth Street and the tie-in with Atlanta Avenue at Lake Street ; realignment of Lake Street (abo" Oren4* Avenue) to "T" into Orange Avenue via Third Street ; rrali$rMMrent of Atlanta Avenuv northwesterly into Orange Avenual r9alignomt of Lake Street (mouth of Atlanta Avenue) to 074 into the Atlentik- MCS :ahb 1 Orange connection ; and deletion of the existing alignment of + Lake Street between Chicago Avenue and Olive Avenu*. 2 . pedesignation or walnut Avenue rrom a local street to a secondary arterial between Sixth Street and Lake Street ; and extension and designation of Walnut Avenue as a primary arterial from Lake Street to Beach Boulevard . 3 . Realignment of Fifth Street to tie-.n with Sixth Street between Main Street and Orange Avenue and designation of Sixth Street as a secondary :arterial ; redesignation of Sixth Street from a local street to a primary arterial between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway ; and deletion of birth street between Main Street and Pacific Coast }ii.ghway . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of_ junp, 19`94 • i Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FO : �► '0, "71Z A City Clerk � city ney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: ty M n stratolF rector a ve opwen Services 2. �`.., � . . _ _ _ ter— �•: y�r��. A GAL ) CITY W N1M"101,ti11 MEWA ) I to ALMA M. V'tO MOtC'f11, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of 'Muntington beach, atW ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that t6" .hole WARMr of members of the Clty Council of the City of Muntingtoe Meath to seven; Chet the foregoing resolution w4s peeved *PA adoptd by the affirmative vote of more than a vajority of all the members of raid City Coveeil at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4 _ day of Jung_,,,•�„_ 29-M .••. by the following Grote: I i AM: Councilmen: [Aa_ Al 1 i stpr,,. � Noss: Councilmen: Kant....._ �.�.._...._... _ �._. NOT YOTi91i3*: Thomas .....�.��.w......��.—.w��.�rar.� ..w.��w+�.�. wr•err .r1..r � AM39NT: Councilman: Mandi C ABSTAIN: Pattinson • Cy- City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of MuntilKtow Meath. Caltfdl"14 � rt 14C :ti�in�l CA file is this A�cl. I ` .1'r f':. o Q -ZMA • 4• 4 r TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTM PACE 1.0 INTRODUCTION t 1.1 MoUZ ologr i 1.2 HiItory • 1.3 E:nvironnwi tal Statue 4 2.0 MAJOR ANENDNENT RECKESTS S wft- 2.1 Drenge t ant •k• 3 LZ Walnut Avenue E xt"on 9 L3 Fifth/Sixth Streets 17 APPENDIX A Environmental Ameowwr t 17 R� FM, . 1.0 IN TRODUC T I CNA This document constitutes an amendment to :he Circulation Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan and is the first amendment to tNe vkwniart for 1964. The Circulation Element was adopted as a mandated eferner~t of the General Plan in December, 1976; this Is the fourth am*#%*. art to tlrs Circulation Element since its original adoption. The adopted Circulation plan of Arterial Street and Highways is presented In Figure I.I . i.i Methodology This report addresses a number of proposed changes to the Circulation Plan of Arterial Street as.-A Highways (Flqure 1-1) as rreguestod by the Drpertmaras of Public Works and Development Services. The ama xkftnt requests (tx Fi9wo 1-2) consist of deletions and rsaligmne is of artarials and charges In arterial designatiam The prupossd chimes are analyzed In Section 2 In tsetna of existing and proposes! circuistion patterns and traffic volurrang impact an existing errd planned lead uses and consistency with edopto+d City 9m1% polities Ord plans. In order to evahrate arterial claselfiicatimm rrra! to serve the ewt Md and future tnOfk tmditionr, certein criteria and assurnptiona am nneda 109af roadway cpscltWu The eortr of capacity arm tar mlotierwo baw"" capackyl wd tre"It voko It is espraarrd by rr wo dl Mva1! of `w,%4 * wMah Is i R"thod d-wlapId by tftr County of Orago for its t1W"Mtr°, CAWFAWA to tfr Gawa i roles& The anoupt of levels of ter" ewdd111* UM uMb thM Is on albooMiti Ilrek to tha &n o" oR traffic tin em erdvl dw om r p 11" a l ivali a+or tla�rrr 1,opA �tt�rrir� a ud# t Milt bv& A* awfti -11 pigs�+� ` rwlot01 an a WN In flee fttaltft t1iM rrtretm" ar " am sum atf�rll�ftl M In 4000 and - I MCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL. STREETS AND HIGHWAYS Aso u"Tm w• i-oC`"men LEGEND -wmwn. %CT[ 'I� � M• .�• yK.rt �Fowl �■+� 1► � i "0 w W ^ wMM wom w f CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH amw COLN TT CAI#3A"& mommm .mummmu wr,, EXISTWO CRC "Mm Lev ole of se 4c• ere dellmd as A thtrs9h F. eeyard Novel of service E. especity is *%coedv and arrivirq; traffic will exceed the trlrility of • liven street to accommodate it. The six levels of service are clef Ived as followst Level of Service A indicates no physical restriction an %wreting operds. Level of Service 8 indicates stable flow with few reetrictiane an operati rq speed. Level of Service C irv►licates stable flow, hipt%-r volurn% arrd rrrore restrictions on speed and `e:;v;: charging. Level of Service G indicates approaching unstable flow, little frrredom to maneuver, end condition tolerable for short poriads. Level of Service E Indicates unstable flow, lower operating speeda then level of service D. some momentary stoppanl" Level of Service F indicates forced flow operation at low spreds where the highway acts as a store" area and thretf are many stopp egeso The practice cf the County and City when planning the arterial systwm is to use v f a level of service C or link c�acitees (a link i• the partiory of the roadway between two arterial intersections), with the intent of maintairArg level of service U through intersections. The following table showle the roadway capacity values that County and City user for circulation analysis of each type of facility. RQADW%+Y CAPACIT Y VALUES' F neewsys/T ransportetion Carridars Freeway Sizes At Level of ServiceD• 4 lanes 656000 6 l eves 1150000 s lance 145.00O 10 lenses 175,000 Arterial Highways Level of Service* Type of Arterial A e ��-- D E F 6 Iwo* divided *000 409400 450= 499M 340M • 4 Ion" dulled 2690M 279OQ0 306000 339NO 360000 4 lor+aa(undlvida4 INM I"W 2O#=1 2290M 24�000 2 lame(WA vrm" 510OO ?ISM 10,000 I4XW 1% eMmkio efi ov ersga daily ersef f is (AD f� !n wwftXWq the araqusaits cartelned In this s�rs►w douses, the City p10� stetf utilized infarorrertien ca teined In the Downtown Specific Plan Ell, approved by taw City Caum i 1 n Jsuity, I M13, orb a special trelf is kvgmwt *r+My►aia fspMt far that Dow n praparnd br Cre9r and Con*", a privates orgina Mop wW plarrnirisp firer, In August, 191). The Pubik works treffbe ssetlar also pftviftd the pkWwt#q staff with updated traffis 9waralon vokanwas and raker meftbd Medway asctiotvs f or the am" of concern c onside.red in the a�rrsrodirosrot. 1.2 History The throe moves of concern included in this amendment are all cantered in the C ity's downtown ore*. The proposed changes to the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways have been the focus of lengthy study red s+valysis by City staff and are viewed as an integral part to the viccess of the City's downtown revitllIzation as envisioned under the Downtown Specific Plan and Redevelopment PieM1 Ptannirg efforts for this part of the City have a long history. Over the year% the land was subjected to intensive oil drilling, and has user+ ter site of petroleum related storage+ treetm*M and transport operations. Ouring the 19b0's and 1970's, when the City was expanding rapidly both in terms of arse and papulstion, growth was concentrated away from the downtown. The old downtown an an economic and physical decline. Businesses s for began Ph7 dap reed the newer neighhorfwood shopping centers which were conveniently located near burgeoning residential subdivisions. Downtown boca►me a place of surf Wh ps and other commercial ew.ablishmcnts primarily supported by seasonal beach users and consequently experiencing severe sessonai fluctuations in their buminesa. Before the high demand for coastal develoVment sites could bring a revitelizinq influence to the downtown, the 1976 Coastal Act irnpored new planni.ty and development constraints. Under the Coastal Act. the City was regAted to produce a land use plan for its coastel zone, an area which included all of the downtown. After several yes-os of concentrated effort, the City Cowcil edupted a Coestat Land Use Plan in January, 1"1, and later approprietvd money to fund the development of a Specific Plao which would provide zoN1y for the P ian'a imp lament 6ttom During the process of developing the Coastal Land Use Plea, extensive bdw.kgmund studies were unoertaken which assessed many of the onvironmental isaos affecting downtown Including transportation mind circulation The Downtown Speclfic Plate adopted by the City Council in October, 19639 was drafted in the context of ttwe detailed background investigations. It was designed to implernent the Coastal Land Use Plan and the policies of the Coastal Act within the framework of local, envirormentsl, polit.iesl and ecarawnis constraints. The Plan promotes a mix of commercial, resislerteel, wW recreational uses which will be able to take advantage of the one's proximity to the ocean. Integral to the Specie ie PIan's In+pkwnes+tation Is a eirt:ulotien sysr,ev" winch will augrment the aros's existing circulation plans and !restsse its safety and a fickney. 103 Environnrantel SLOWS !hoses w4ew of the phsMd Nseaive Out:!anstison No. W 14 was p"panA and WMMA d for a tin + ► period begirw+inq may 3. 1lM. i 4 r 2.0 MA" ANCNOti£NT REOIJESTS i he various amendment regtAMs analyzed in this seectial are shown in F iylura 1-2. 2.1 Orange/At lant a/Lake 2.1.1 B ac kg round The Crange Avenue/Atlanta AvmmlLcke Street aria of comem (see Figum 2-1) has been the focus of extensive orwalyis by City staff in plonrirq for the dovrnt ovrn c irc ulat ion sy m e m. Prop as to f unc t len as on er A-welt wmetial cofx ting Beach Boulevard and Sixth Street,, the At lore arOralgt-Leke camvaction can serve &a an alternative to Pacif Ic Coast Highway In providing access to troth tho Downtown area and the baach. 2.1.2 Analysis The anwarwdm request for arts a of cons em L l inc ikmdes Wo aftertal redewgnetion and three realiqrwnsrit s: I. R i0e*nst ion of Oreoge Avenue from a sec ands ry to a primary ertw iel between Sixth Strait o rid the tie in with At tarts Avenue at LdW St tom. 1 Reaftrr+rrent of LOW Street (above Orr►W AvenW to Or MM.o Otempe A wow vie Third Strmpt. 1 A wftni i m It e/ At Isi e A venue n advaete ly bee Omip Avwm% ad 1 ADAM5 od lAl J w INDI a J 20310, ' 261 ��► PRIMARY � • ' w 1 SECONDARY 2*2 DELETION REALIGNMENT••••e•••••••� 1 t AMENDMENT REOUEST4 SOCH 1-� r . #w AONR;nrneart of LaM * Stara (south of Atlaents Avenw) to wP Into the AtWKSIOMMp c4;% ectton. S. C 4k4lrfn of tU a ea he kq Lake Street a1l4rwne-4 between 0ftege and OU vo A valrrwr;. Several mvia we In the operation of the straeat sy stern a[r cont"lated es pert of the Downtown plaawvirg effort. These ch*nWn Include d9r el raj►stem rsrvidonw, an ircreawd numtwr of travel larva on Psc it it Coast Highway, rhea closure of certain strostw the construction of some street extensions, and the realignment of iwy orter•ielr into the downtown atla. Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Is the major traffic: carrier in the Downtown Specific Piet+ ores. Runniny parallel to the shoreline, It providtts the principle access route connecting Huntirgton Beach with adjacent coastal cache. It also pvtoorits one of the rnoq dgnif 1cwvt clrcu:etiao problems in the downtown, o wi. Even with the planned wider0rg of PCH to six lanes by CalTrens (scheduled for completion in summer, IW16), +alternative routes to the downtown and tfw beach eta nacesmiy to provide adrequatae eitrct!lation to serve the mix of uses pl arxred for the s two. rhea downtown plorvi►y studies identify the pier-head and the arse immediately •crow PCH as the focus for the greatest intercity of f%Aum derveloWtorat. An Important rmphssis of the design concept is to extend Main Street inlwd from the ocean and encourager pedestrian movement along the street. A second major activity erode is propri*J for the area, bou ed k, 4th Ar+eet, Palm A wrv^ Lake Street sad Orange Avenue. A variety of activities Is envimiored for this "super-block' including office, residential, a trtell center, and a major open space as a tarmlrue to Main Street. As the downtown rredevelopr„ Atlanta avenue is soon as a waxy route from Beech Boulevard to the downtown core srvJ the City beach. By realigning Atlantan Avenue nortt}weesterly irto Orange Avenue; an inland arterial [cute would be formed which car be uses as an akernnti ,e to Pacific Coast Highwel, (ere Figure 2-1). Redesignatirg Orange Avenue from a secondary to a primary between 6th Strwt and the tie in with Atlanta Avenue would create a direct primary arterial route from ©*tech Boulevard to the downtown core. Beyond Sixth Street, however, the cortinuetivre of Orange would remain a secondary with one trawl lane in each direction. This, together with special traffic controk, will term to disca:rege traffic from entering tte pnKWNnineertly residers i al Townlot a wo. Spec if it traffic sig ne li r at ion devices will be designed at the project implementa.W gage. The realt nment of L.sic a Street (south of A t tarts) to "T" into the proposed 9 Atlsma/Orarge connection offers a primery arterial route :o the beach. While the design of the AtlartilDr+ngeXeke ircersrction will faclYtate through traff k into ard out of the dowrtrwn cure via Beech Boulevard, the Lake Street connection additionally of fors direct access to the City beach time without tra use of PCK N+neth of Orange Avenv% Lake Street is proposed to he realigned Intl+ the Atlerts-Orerge primary via the misting Thirst Street right-of-wey. This will provide tat the everstusi ab�ar4mmert W Lake between Dsrrge +end Chicago ��► �' !'� DELETION 41 -C \ `S _ ''L �sip i. � � �yam\ �ti. `J ��,.•' t ^ LU Ar !, _a i • �-1 iii _� • r•/ f _ Il 1 / _ - t`7 j . \`\ ' ;00 ft-IRMA Fll LijMm rin M. ••�f �� AR OF Iasi K . • 2ol Orange Avenw/ tkmta venue a I"� "` °�"'` Lake Street A vsemm to aiiaw for • Isms ewmildeted devolapnrent proet an tits percesl. Additkmily►g by vee:siiwg thee pwtlan of Lakeo reethAaurd tref f is an Lek` will be led Iran the At bent W0ivnge arterial wW be dlecaursged from to WN rq through oRablished reddontiei rssi rborload. non% of OnMe. Current traffic volumee on Atiarte A venue batw Booth Boulswd end Lake Arnt avenge 14980 daily trIps. Orange Avenua, betwom Lake and Sixth. its presently a st im art ed to accommodate ),M ADT. 9 ath of three arterials a rag opetatinq at the A level of service tar tither a primary or astardefy arterial at the presort tinntst. Assuming the ultimate devetlaprnert of the downtown as invidaned under the Oowrtown Spec if is Plan and Rodvvelopment Plan, Public Workr hoe projwted the proposed AtlantalLske/Orenge reslignrrwnt would provide sdaquete hard li ng of anticipated t raf f is volumes. As shown In Figure 2•2, the Atlorts-Orange arterial would accommodate signif 1c&rty highar traffic volumes then what presently exists in the aeea. With an estimated 21gow ADT on Orange between Lake and the tie in with Ati+erts. and 13,:� ADT on Orange between Lake and Sixth (excluding be ch►-gWrq tripe). Public Works has estimated that there two arterial metiore would operate at Ltvols of Service 8 and A, respectively. Public Works has recornmended that Omega Avenue, between Sixth sand Lake, be built as a four-lane divided primary arterial. Orange A venue. from L eker to Atlanta, In to be b Vi it as a fair-lane undivided ptirnery arterial. The maligned Lice Stratt between PCH and the Atlenta/Orange tie in would herdic a projected 24,000 ADT sad operate at Level of Service B. Z.1.3 R ec omma nd at ion Staff recornnw*4s approval of all requests con■idered in Am a of Concern Z.l . The proposed Atlente/Orange/Lake reall.-rwnena will provide a primary alternative route to PCH to both the Meech and the downtown :oar. With the anticipated redavelopment of the downtown into a mix of feAdentiel, commercial, of f Ica and retail using it is essential to provide a primary arterial Ink Into the downtown core to service these uses. L2 Walnut Avenue Extondon 2.2.l 8 ar kground Like the A t lent e/Orange/Lak a reelig nrmerit, the proposed Walnut Avenue extension hae uidergone thorough analysis by City staff and Is ewer w a key e adt~wrest alternative route to PCH to the downtown aid beach are ea. 2.2r 2 Ana ly si s The wnendmanit request for Area of Concern 2.Z Is to dealgrtate W shvAA A vnm a me a primary arterial between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard and from a focal street to a setonrdery 'betwaien Lake 5treat and Sixth Staeet (nee Figure Two roeAo% Beech Boulevard nerd Goldenwerot Street, carrwfrt tree dowmawnn ami with tie 40 Freeway nerd inland communit" Access to the treewey may be an importers cat taint are future de a lopment along the covet. The Projections ate biwA an ultimate develc want of the aowntcml specific Plan an4 :ted'Jvalo7,rwpt Plan anticipated in It 10 192012 ICI " � aaD► a IPA iw V.T AVOW"N S1400 �'JaGiCs y,�.+�Gl 4ti10 PROJECTED TRAFFK VOLUMEM 11mam"w"a Klan dir�CN . �iA1�INIING e� `\ip • dp LLJ W LXI CD 'C€-R t N%cs Pc 2.2 WWtvat Ex'LMIOFWI C4100M �� r1Mt e1r■11 1W laraW in a aitllok" Ira tam d fop way oaoasrt1111Mtr0 orrlittclr s r f WIN fra n the freeway Mow MW canniected IV aMinnad num*w of setwialh apnm s of which are gel go ad at tiro& Inn oldition to the "dead AtNftQ%)ftnpWLdke r00%mw t, the Woke A wma arcterraien Can Mtvo as another InlaMwo ute to eo rrort Roach Bomb ward and Lake StteaL Futuna p are to tie this MoAs Irce the pk reed extogion of Hair i Iton A ve at Beach Boulevard. T his would not only pr vi le converted ocean to the future commercial amass sow of Lake Sweatt, but would Oleo provide sn Improved no one of travel between downtown Huraingtorn Beech and Costs Mews, hvth the Newport mid Son Mop Froeweys, and pokes bey*t L Vehicular movement could be via either Hamilton A venue/Vk+ %aria Streit or, eventually, Banning Avenue/19th Street. Currertly, Walnut Avenue, west of Lake Street, carries er estimated I,a00 ADT. Assurning ukimrte downtown deveIapmeat bawd on the Downtown Spec if is Plan end Redevelopn nt Plan, the Deperunert of Pvbltc Works has est imet ed that if W almst Is extended through to B sae h Boulevard (eventually to tie in with Hama kon A venue), Walmit will csety I5,000 ADT east of Laker Street and 10,400 ADT wet of Lake, excluding befch•goiwg trlpso 1.091e0d to a primary status between Lake and Beach, and a secondary bet 6th and Beach Walr*A can adequately accommodate the projected traffic generation operating at Level of Service p, according to the Departmert of Public Works estimates. Public Works has recommwwled that WaIMA from Beech to Sixth be de ve Icpad as f our and i vided lanes. 2.2.3 Recommendation Staff racomi Nm da approval of the proposed changes considered in Ana of Concern 2.2. The Walnut exteno6ar4 as proposed will varve es an important east-wait connector to the downtown cote and beaches, w d alleviate ttatfic conge st ionr on PCH. Additionally, the eventual contact iorr of Walnut If** the proposed Hamilton extension wig allow for s direct wute from Costa Me" and adjacent areas irto the dowreowr6 L) F'ifth/Sixth Street L 3.1 Ba k9nxx d On October 10, 1909 the City Council Mppro wd the Downtown Specific Plan. In addkian to setting toad uses and developrnent tarnd ds for the acute, the Specific Flan also contalred a preliminary analysis of traffic circulation. The study rrcorrrrnerJad several arterial changes in the Dowrtown and polite of concern for turther eveluatim An orrq the traffic recommendations owtalnad in the Spec if is Purr wee that Sixth Street be rodesignetsd f rlr+rn a Ideal KIMM to a eacardery arterial from Main Street to Pacific Coast Highway, thterreby ireplacing Fifth Street welch is pmeently dedgmed as a secondary. The Insets of how Sixth Streat should tie Into Main Street and Lace Strasat was at said* for eddit bowl study. City staff have d tee w*ly:ed circulation In the downtown area, &W developed several proposed chingee to the Ckculation flan 61 Arterial Stroats and 110wrare to sddrrse the Itauaa IdMEWd In efts Specific Plam This eivoi+dmwtt Item inchodas three con It - ,14pu s; nirNM� etas IF .1 lift a ql I=#, 14 ;"IM Octb":ut r. • 1+ Will SIm- som '? txum �mom Ar AL L � .- .. ,ter � ♦ � - ram. •• �,� �-. .. t ' t i ti { i r I ROG% errwrrrt of Fifth UNA to tie in with Sixth knot bltwo n Win a A eaaoerd�rrtr it riai. Mrs seed the e+d�irttiarr of this, W* os b) Redo 4nretin of Sixth Street Imm a unreel streat to a prinMry orWIW i between 0nmp A were Seed Pat 9k Corm Highway. W Deletion of Fifth Strom as a ascande ry arterial betvrsen Main Streit red Pacific Coat Highway. These proposed changes am shown In Figure 2-4. 2AZ Analysis The• ~action seedy m the proposed chw%W to Fifth Streit and Sixth Strwrot ►r1 toms of the offsets on (1) circulation patterns within the downtown and in the surmund►ng sme Including existing end projected tref fic volumes, errd (2) existing and future land ussi In the area. In 1976, Main Streit was downgraded to a lncel collector south oaf Siventow th Street an the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets end Highways. It was intended that Sonventoorith Street and Like Street provide prWwry arterial access to the downtown a err. F if th Street replaced Main Street an the pion q a secondary carrier Gf traffic to the downtown care mrW beach As Lake Street. SubsegLoot street improvements cortinued to do;emphed n Main Street and augment Fifth Streit in the downtown. In 1981, Main Street from Orango A verve to Pacific Coast Highway was modified to a one-wry stroat to serve prirnerily the retail stores wW offices within the coal area. The ineereeftion of Filth Street and Pic If ic C or t Highway was signs b v*4 and wren i mer%W to divert beech-earnesting trips vie Fifth Street,. Existing traffic vukwmme on Mein S~ and Fifth Street south of Orange A venue average 2,00 arrd 5,300 trips per day respectively. Sixth Street cunvM ly Mt(reacts Main SLre t at Acacia Avenue and function~ essentially n a residential collector at NO trips per day. The lard use lnt end ties under the Local Coastal ElanwePit and Downtown Spw if is Plan will dramatically increase traffic ow+tating and leaving the dowmawn area in the fauns. The proposed rrde ve loped area will be eonrpeiand of a mixture of connwnorcial uses of various tepee+ office bui ldngh geld teal utdtsi hotols, scei nacreaitionsl facilitles. It is projected that sppeadmetaly 93,863 daily trips wvt 11 be generated f mn redo vo lapmort above existing tretf is vokomo% and eacludkq beec"aing tr ips. The proposed chars to F if th Street and Sixth Street In cor4unction with the moonrnai dad Orange Avenue-Lake Street-Aherne Avenue cone ioetkwo (Ara• L 0 " the Welnit exterden (Atom LZ are designed to accon- at@ this pm*ned traff it. The deletion al Fifth Street from the Circulation ClenYrenrt wood divert n'rwot i traffic to Sixth Streit. The O►epertmem of Public Wdrha eitirfratar there the rsaftned section of Fifth Strom with Sixth Street between Lake SUM Mr4 Onmp Aarnus would ca►rty 'IOJ= vehicbs daily while Sixth Semen south ai Orange A ven u to P oc N is Corsi Highway wouN c artyr an ast Mneted I SAN rehnic ter (F 14ure 2-3). Cor4daring the design cohdrairta in es44" F kth Street with Sixth Street shave oranges Avenues this afrwrnt was" be brdh or e twarlerre dl%WW secardwy attedol, w d ate the pt+oieatad tWf is sit i, i1 Level d So D. Ulth UPDA GMh of aerfte AWftW WWM be IWOneed a a feufr-larra "vidrd Pima ertWW to goal wns date the preoMed twrff It st Level e/ Swvko The rif th-Sixth west carowtion it designed to provide nerthrrdy aaaeer ftern Ldw start send Main Street ifte th perpoosd cosnnwmlol town asm TMe concept calk for the devel p~4 of a 20 acre coAmorCiel rerptlecls harmed by the prtposrd FIftl►-Sixth Strut commtiori� Lake Sty and Oftrip Avenue. In adslitioo to cormoYdating pniporty►l the soadMoick concept vrJU require that Mein Street. Fifth Street, pion AvemsA and aileyvrcgrs within the project erne be vacated, This would alma mote what is aaaent lolly a dn-wey I me.mct ton that now W sLe at M ain, F if th end Pac an. The proposed rifth-Sixth Street connection would oho provide a aesiorrdaryr COON ctI n between Locke Street and Orange Avenue. Hovrevrr, it is Intended that nvost of the trot it using Sixth Street be directed to and from that ertarial via the Orange A v -Atlanta A ve rvA corerrct ion and the w alm& A wrrw extension. To encourage this flow, Sixth Street would be designoted are e prirnery arterial below Orange A verue with an offset sligrrnert to the northerly Sixth Street segment at the Orange Avemin intereect.W6 This would help limit traffic an Sixth Street above Ofenga Avenuo to local rresieiertiai uAre and cornrmmially-oftorted users of the town apart area. L 3.3 Stiff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of all m quests considered in A m& of Concern L3. The cant igurat ion of the proposed commercial town oque re necessitates deleting Fifth Street and designating Sixth Street as the orterial curler from Lake S truce to P ec if is Coast Highway. The redeadg rat ion of Sixth Street from a local street to a primary arterial below Orange Avenue weed provide a rertheMy archor to the downsown clmmeetion system to occornmadote the No trot fit volumes gawratrd by redsvelg mwK of the Core ante. rs '� , I • � APPENDIX A ' 1 I I CITY OF WATINSTO 89ACM INITIAL STUDY IWINNO, I . a�r►c�ul�o 1. Applicant Citl of NuatsN tar 2. Address SO" Mairk street 1rt 1 — 7 1 a. J;% t Te+r:at on filvetowpoo less Inaten Jeach , Proo.if:t Title/Description __ Clrcp.! •s_ Ie!_AW20J0*"t 44-1 .. � . 16ty .. a 4._,. 11 . ENVIRMWFITAL IMPACTS: (Explanations of all "Yes" and 'Maybe" answers are req:Airred on attached sheet) . 1 , Physical Environrnerrt: Will the project have a significant impact on the physical rnvirennwnt w t respect to: a ) hydrology, b) air quality , c) gtolo4Y, d) flora and fauna, e) noise, f) archaeological/historical . Yes Maybe M No I Other 2. Impact of Envtroniment on Project: Will the project be Subject to irwpacts from the surrounding environment. i .e. , natural environment; wanwade environ eot. lies Maybe No _X 3. 1m cts on Public Services : will the project have a significant impact upon,, r,r re■ su t in a need for a new or altered government service in any of the following areas: fire, police, schools , parks or other governmental agencies. Yes ltayhe .„_X No 4 , lareat-ts on traffic/Circulation: Will project result in substantial vehicular '+ovL: "t. or impact Surrounding Urculac3on system• or increase traffic hazard? Yes X Maybe No S. Will the project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect ^^ the existing: land use• population/housing , energy/utilities , natural rescur•rr Irinain hull th? YR•, _. . Maybe Mo X 11. 111 Irr•r IX)ten t is l environmental irnl)ac is not discussed above (see t ttmeW Sheet) $ w . n11ir R RUSPONS 1 RLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSnNS CONTACTEII ( ) See Attached ( X Not Applicable IV. HMDATORY PINAINGS OF SICNIfICANCE : 1 . Will project degrade quality of "v i rorrnen t? Yes � � Maybe _,_„ Re , X is will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term envirovwenta' goals? Yes Maybe No ,L 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cueulatively considerable? Yes „ , Maybe __.... No _L_ A. Will the project adversely affect harem beings either directly or Indirectly? Yes Maybe .- No __JL V. DETE9141-UTION t X I Nevative 1k08ration ( y "tivo Oeclaratioa With Mitigation [rrvfr+e nto1 lopect Aeport • r rMeelS HNAT11Rt Z tWAC'1's Oixpl4mtLoa of 01fte• ad omvmr 401"CO) 1. If the CIMMlation $lit t is ptr , it vili lreilitate rorpowso timr of pablix misty pecomml to the Odom town• Oommni ty. 4. TM project Mi11 not directim iwraaat tho potowtlol for tref f io hazard. It gill allevtat` eonvaatlon on the avrroondinl Skate highway &:A facilitate traffic flow within the Low"Ute area. I s • . 1 hvMVq ton beach dove scrik44 departimmt STAf f RIE ORI f -0: Planning Conmi ss ion fiti0!! : tievtlopnent Services DA:'Es December 16, IS186 . 8J ECT : DOWNTOWN nUS ROUTES As part of the Planning Commission and City CouncV approval oC Precise Plan~ of Street Alignment 86-1 for the down -own arterials, direction was given to staff to s-udy the impact cA' the alignments or bus service in the area . In response to that direction, staff !;as connunicated with the Orange County Transit District and c :ppsred the following i.n. for ation . As nhown in Niure I , the dcwntown area is :resanzly servic-j by s : x b4-- •ov%ts ; 11 4151 :9t 31 , 76 and 80) . Route 1 opt=atta in ao st : s :qn: li. ne thrcusch the. City on Pacif is Coast Highvri . ;to%-:tt 2f cce :Aces in Orsnce Av-2nue and cul.wnzrates in a terminal loop tin :.&kit S : :tet/?CH/Hunt :na=on St :ee t:'A tlanta Avenue . Route 24 opp:a tes on Mb : n Street dur ;.ng key team -triods and then utilizes Fi ." tw Street And Orange Avenue to also cwlninate in a terminal loop on La`'ce St :pat/Pacific Coaa: Higt.way 'Huntington Street/Atlanta Avenue . i ao,: te 37 ope:a 'tes on Atlanta Avenue and also culminates in a to :urinal loop on Like Street/?C:H/Huntingtor, Sttoot/Atlanta Avenue . Route 76 opo :s.t+s on Dels4a re Street to Frankfort Street to Fifth Strtat and then north-westware on Orange Avenue . Lastly , Route 80 op*ratea on Atlanta Avenue and ,culminites in a terminal loop on Cake Street/Fifth Street/Orange Avenue. All of the above-described roues ,except Mute 1 will be affected by the adopted arterial realignments in .he downtown . Figure 2 depicts the realigned downtown arttrials as pet the adopted ptecist pl *ns and Circulattors � Element . It is not anl% ici:)ated that the revised intersection of Atlanta/LaW Grange as shown in Vi15, utt 2 will nit atively Impact or cause the re-rcutinq of Routes 29, 37 or �0. Rather , it is likely that these routes Will C*ntinye to operate in their prcaent patttrns except that Route RA will use. the Late/Third Street connection to Mang* hvt:aue as part of its terminal loop, instead of Lake to Atlanta. % •• 1 team* `•. $29 NIS as ♦�' .o �'• �►j� s. i N r. 40 •`:•. f. a A-LAN'll AYt. r �• 1•����.H�1.�..� �.t. �.1.1.1-11 F..1 0a'iI Fro.r.11.1. .�..H...ha • • j • 0 • •i • •e •� ••e • el • C4jvo M► EX l S1 I G OW RMES I cwmou • N 0 I� fMKK Io" An. 4 NN,/ r� h w ol �. 1 i � t • ,I oLZOPT90 APTERIAL - i1WC:SC PLAP1NtO � ram; AMM. 0 hPUNIAL • NW.. PPEC20[ PLAMfKp LOCAL STPUT Am oamosom N iiACMIT1 IIATEp tllU ow Routes 29, 76 and 80 will be re-routed from Fifth Street between Pecan and Orange Avenues as a result of the connection o1 Sixth Stre-ot to Fifth Street north of Orange ,Avenue as nhown in Figure 2. Routes 29, 76 and 60 will then utilizer that new connection north of orange Avenue . Route 249 will continuer to access t1he Fifth/sixth Street connection via Main Street . Router 76 will continue to access the fifth/Sixth Street connection via Frankfort Avenue and Roue 60 will continue to accesa the connection via Lake Street and Orange Ave On.+ . OC 0 notes that the existing bus stop and layover for :hose toy;r.is at Fifth and Main Streets will need t,) be accommodated when :ha realignment occurs . Staff foresees no problem with this since the existing bus stop and layover are presently located at cur5side on t::e old Civic Center property and can simply oe relocated sl ig':tl;• f.; r Cher onto the property when the real i innent occurs. As previously noted, Routes 25 and 76 both presently operate on Orange ►venue northwest of Fifth and Sixth Streets . The downtown artecia1 realignments will not alter the need for these buses to continue to operate on Orange Avenue . PArtia'lly due to the Mike Rcgars Senior Center on 17th Street and Orange Avenue , these routes have a heavy senior citizen ridership and their presence in :te area _s .needed . onctrn to 0-:7. D re .a .—I : na Routes 25 and 6 on Orancs Aver._'! 13 .z ' nte , zs t . C'i a : -z ix,:h Straew and � r 3": '� ;':en'.:� '"a! �3::: ' 3" "• `,_ • • ? • �"1 i13is v ` .�. _ i�G r.� �ter..l4�.• , �- • •.~.- ..:� wIS al 0Z t cy ,'n Ct--is: . on a„c Cic•r Couraci 1 cor.: 3 :.:7,s wcr ; ant in Sic. : - n 5 � • :e . hit • -e � n_er:ecti �n c ! Six:h S- ree: . d r : ^ w :-e _ . � . . .. = A-es :._»..e _ a . ....i _ 3RC: c . scot; a fs .iCu 1 sc i-i-il or. Av-.-n 'o .. .rt . --ae _.: r frG'' he ':CW- -.r:'1 ' n' o t.'o tOwn,. 3 : �3 . • 0::e .o t .".e ni-, d for bus se ; 11ca t3 cont in';t or C ange A -:—'1 t.^.ti intersection treat.nent :, Qs: ce design^d : n a manner wn ; : •. ill a: low buses to negotiate a nor :h-wostwa r d novenen t . 57.n13 qu i re:-ent « ill sor.ewh+at 10%i t the ty!jes u! physical designs wh i m can be used ;0 linit traffic . Signage. and parkway trtAttments , however , will still b•s effective for discouraging automobile, traffic north-westward on orange Avenue.. Lastly , GC:'D has indicated that at Sono pntnt in the future, it will be desirable to extend bus service down Sixth Street between Grange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway . Thert are presently no bus routes between Orange Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway due to lack of demand _ +4s the downtown rtdevelops , however , demand will Increavo to trio point where a service route on Sixth Street will be justi �' ic4. since the precise plan does not permit on-street parking an Sixth Street , OCTD has indicated that bus turnouts, bus stops and passenger shelters should be provided on the east and west side of Sixth $creet between Walnut And Olive Avenues . There are presentlyY vacant lot3 on each side of Sixth Street on this block wnich should be examined fee such use . OCTD has not indicated which existing bs* tout• Vould cperate -tin this section of Sixth stcoat « As downtown cedevelopwent progresses, tbt necessacy timing ice Impleoeatation of the precise plan of street 41ignwont. will be dettrsinQd. It will be important !oc the City to keep OCrD informed of pending changes to that planning foe tomporacy bus re-rootin9- during construction can occur . The City wt11 also need to work with OCTO to ensure that the Orarigt/Sixth intersection is adequate to accoxnodate b+:s passage and to ensure that adequate bus turnouts and o,:s stops are re:ainod throughout the downtown aria . 1 . Adopted Ordinance for PPSA 86-1 � . Letter from OC D dated c�ovemotr 7 , 1986 1s:P: HS : kIa 06 a I 1 cour TY MAIIIairT r.AUTft=T %oveesber 3. 1966 Mr. James W. palin Director, Development Services City of Runtington Beach P.O. Box M Huntington loath, CA 92648 Dra r Mr. !a 1 in: OC:'D has reviewed the prtcise'plao"fpr arterial street alignments in the downtown area. The precise plan will soot likely influence OCID service coverage in the following nays upon completion of the redevelop- Pent project : as A service aliirmenc would be rerouted to operate on 6th Street. between Orange Avenue and pacific. Coast Highway to better pene- trate the redevelopment area. Because on-street parking will not be pemitted along 6th Street , bus turnouts and bus stops should be provided on the east and vest side of 6th Street, betwiteu Walnut and Olive Street to accom date bus passenger activity. Considerattion should also be given to providing pas- senger shelters at these stops. At this tine, It is preeeature to specify which line would be rerouted onto 6th Street . o Lies 76 may be realillned to opesate slang 6th Stiest . betw ern Orange and Sth Street . Extatipg steeps on Sth Strost at Maio should be idequat• for expected p►ossaiger levela , provided that these stops are not dispLaced by the street sligamt. OCTD Liao 80 currently has a layover sons at Sch aad has Street i and a now layover loca r ion would have tv be identified for the line. Thank you for your tonsiderat Lon of transit related issues in Cho circuls- tios alsmemt of the redevelopment plans, please contact ere at 716/971-4406 if you have any comments are questions. fLeceatsl:. � � #�raelsttew/se►t at Spice IPIMMI g ! 031C ytJr 4s�d e�ilae�• • r.� a�+r isN •eluswMer e,aove. asi►u�m+wa► sow •t tease ei��M i � 1 • 01101NAIICE 00. 2E71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Of MUNTINGTOM 99ACM AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCZ CODE EY ADOPTING PWISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 16-1 ALIGNING WALNUT AVENUE SETWEEN SIXTH STREET AND LAKE STREET; SIXTH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY AND ORANGE AVENUE: SIXTH STREET BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND LAKE STREET: ORANGE AVENUE BETWEEN SIX:ei STREET AND THIRD S:RE£T t AND LAKE STREET B«•: d!!.: ATLA:::A AVEN'%JE AND PACIFIC COKST K:GHWAY 91.1EREAS, V. r suant O'o t n e California Government Code , the Planning Commission of the City of *Ejnt ir.cton Beach , after notice. duly riven, held a public rearing to consider Precise, Plan of S«reet Alignment. :to , 66- ; ; and ::HrRrAs , after no- ice �:ily given, nearing was held befo:e -:, is Council , and the ma� we: having oeen considered $ the Council ! finds tna� Precise Plan o: Sf: ree� Alignnen- No , 66- 1 is r*%Sonazly i necessary -o tne orderly and efficient flow of traffic, for tre pr eserva - ion of the ,neat :n and safety of -he i nhaoi tarts of �:e I and for t:.e crdP: : , ceveloopmov. o! the -. orimunity . wHEPEAS , the Planning Commission and City Council recognize me concerns of residenMs over preservation of signifieaw, historical structures and the impact of traffic and developeent in the downtown area . NOW, 'THEREFORE , the City Council of the City Os Hung inq•.wn aeacn does aramin as follows : SECTION 1 . District Kip 1 ; ( Sectional District. Map 11-6-11 ) e marked EXrioit A, and District leap 16 ( Sectional District Map 14-6-Ill . sicked ERhibit B, attached hereto and inearpotated ha,rein by taferoncee are hereby amendod to include Precise Play► of • Street A119 0ernt Me . 86+I , to effect the prrcisi AlignOtAt Oft rtoclee Plan/Street 1 . A1i��at ti-� i hi Wiln%t Aviaue betWeen *lath rtsea« and Lake *tt**tl C ) Sixth St r*Vt between Pacific Cans! Highway and 096090 Avenue; D ) Sixth Street between Orang* Avenue and Lake Street ; E ) orange Avenue between Sixth Street and Third Streets and F ) Lake Street between Atlanl.a Avenue and Pacific Coast kignway . SECTION 2 . The real property designated as Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 66-1 is more particularly desctioed in Exniair Cr attached hereto and incorporated herein by ref*rence . �• r � r r SEC. _Oh 3 . ..x.,�.ei .s 0, � and depict interim street � sections wnich shall oe utilized for the construction of walnut Aven..e , 0: enje Avenue and Sixth Street until such time at developm*nt :equires ultir,&,,a ri3ht-of-way sections . SECT:01; 4 . Exnioi - G depicts a proposed alignment of Avenue to ne utilized at the inte:section of Sixth Street and Walnut Aven::e as long as rnt exiswing buildings remain in their present locations . SECTION 5 . Tr,e intersection of Orange Avenue and Sixtn Street anall bt designed incorporating appropriate peasures to limit and discourage vehicular travel on Orange Avenue mirth-westward from the downtown area into •tie townlot Asia * 59CtION 4. This ardinantt &hail take etfeat thirty days after iti adoption . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Couno i 1 of the City of rd,j ourrwd Huntington leach at a rtqulari ■ettinq thereof held on the 15" day o: October , 1966 . LPA- at yo AhTES:: hPPROVED AS :C Four. r Ci. y C.erk City A`•torneY 1 M:.• ♦r./f•. `%-N!:) APPROVE:) : li1�T�Awrr� f7NY APPROVED : r a icy Aamm istra�or _ .0 co. Development Servicei rr�Cis� l�at�l�ttea* � . E • I STRICT MAP - �- SCTIC7NAl I S CITY OF •wn VIEW domes OEM . ! * j BEACH AkI 010 41011"m G~ ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA � '�— r .3 w�411111111111111�� Precis* Plan Of . r 5t ee: Aligrrnent !:a . 66-1:..t. �.��.�,1�.� Exl�}tip R � , i •; .-.. .. AW. TV \ .r I t s /. .•—�« off WNW ISO •0 I rlr•_ • CF-E RI �'� . .� •o ili �. -:. _ =i1 I r�+♦ra /' \i / 1 �� —.+.-f�. .�.� .. �.... .r+r� .ice 11 49 Alp* IPLAMMTF IV 10 ow lot" ., If . ., do-cis or —01 New" ► �� r X% MAW r:• ��ti MM Irl W*9.11116i, mommNS11111 mill mad i�+. +• v ' �� R itA • + Jf SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP CITY OF AUNNTINGTON BEACH *NNW ....r .+•. *do~ OR .�► *GE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA .- i"'�•••�` ... ��•� precise Plan of street Alignment�q� amimw ` �`.u••� someis a - qwL �rf �4c rfaw, T, M;+-Cz •Ar. Or. S`+ a i ; LAN .�• ,ter w � .,=, LUB ? • lm PRUISS PLAN OF STUNT LUG== NO. 66-1 ARR" A, Co to AND E LEGAL USCR I P?IONS i ( A) PRFCYSE AZ IGNMEN OF WALNUT AVEN"UE. SIXTH S PEET TO LAKE -STREET. A strip of land 50. 00 feet in width , the centerline bring deactibed as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Walnut Avenue, a . 60. 00 feet wide street , and the centerline of Sixth Street , a 75.00 ! feet wide street, as shown on the Map 00 Huntington Beach , recorded In book 3 page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of :he County recorder of Orange County, California : thence south SSo 401 sas: 1267 . 50 feet along the center l ine o: wal►at Avenue to a point on the emste-lint of Second Street, a 60 .00 feet wide street as shown on said stap cf Runtington Beach; thence continuing south tdo 60 ' east 1117 . 30 1 stet along that souther•ster.v p,olongation of the cente:!ine os. walnut Avenue , t a point. on the confer 1 ine of ;.eke S&:eet , r w:dt stree. (for.•tner ly Firs: 5:rett ) as shown cn sa:d r"sp .♦s 4Un • •nCt 1 =*A a , ia• �n • being the ` a: mi us of t•. , �es^r .at " centerline . C ) p�.E IS7 hL:aN4m4 N OF S : XTH CONS . H: • W&Y : ORAN E A4; NU=. h strip of land 90 .n0 feet in wi+dthe the centerline being descrlbtd as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Sixth Street , a 75 . 00 feet wide street , and the northeasterly right-of -way of Pacific Coast Nighway, formerly Ocean Avenue, a 100 . 00 feet wide highway# as shown on the Map of Mont ington Bosch recorded in r;ooh 3, page 36 of Miscellaneous Maps in the Office of the Count 1ke4.:nrAer of Orange County, California : thence north 410 201 east 124S fast , more or less , along the centerline of sixth street to its intersection with the northeasterly lime of orange Avenue sz. •howA on said Map of Huntington beaz-h, said intersection being the terminus of the described centerline . The prrypet ty line radius for the s ov tNor ly corner of Sixth St t eel and Ora000 Avenue shall be 90. 00 toot . At all other street intersections ;he corner p:o;*hy lino radii shall be 33.00 feet .