Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Downtown Specific Plan - Revisions - Code Amendment 88-3 - O (12)
FA C 14 /r) E 1VT W. f-R ' �Lu4'Y+ T� Y I � i , w •Fi :...mot r � � ' r � ),� Y' ' '•fir �( �lz�e r' / it 711 r•• `" r ram\ ol PROW LIN �,�� `•� � ` .I•^ r'*/ � � � \fir,YI �L���.�.......�'f 7 1 / �a i I .•.•....ter. ""'"'r'""'"""' • t ?!l1,~f.*1C'i10N bfACy PIANKIMG WYISION IMiU1 IM ommyow 3►ECIiIC mm ILTtttNSctwuliOSCOrK1tt `.�+�7 Q ! ' ( �•/V I List OONI " EXISi1#4 EXISTiNG ��JI::It�S:?r -! :tlti3.:*.!9<yI K7a1►IUiIb+S SPECIFIC 0Ct DM %T OEbnommiS t.I.1. 10^11001 S.F. 39/1 I(TISID OrATOA MUTING ruin ttWff I ttu otul SU SUiLtx1Ut CorauT • fy7"L SIP. Cxln • r" 1tU.7i 1 OISTUCt n10.0946 its. is" 1903 iSM Ists ST= slsslaft COMSICIAL i U.000 If 15.000 If 101.11'S of 60.= sf 45,0v4 If 60,00 •f 04.6w sf rot - - RESIMMAL - (27,A00 81) - ISO uritl 129,�w at) - CCMPCY:IAL. 2 10.000 if 10.0Cl0 if - - - - - M1(L 45 two AS Ms. - - - - (1t MA tr) (:0,254 tf) tESICCWTIAL ISO weltt 349 units 1.l13 well is 1.000 welts 500 wilt 94 writs SW wn1tl CO►1''ERCIAL 1 18,000 it $1.254 it 440.110 If 14.%* Sf 2111.0m It iM.OM of IAA.000 if ►IplEl - - - " r+s bOO r+s (1b0,Ica 1t) (ITO.W* 11) 4rtitE - - 440,121 If 20.0m tf MAW If 10.000 It 11SIOCUTIAL 15 Wis.1 21 wnits 596 w+.itt a04 vellts 2t0 mnitt ssa anits #00 units KATt "P. C". - - - 1OO,GLk1 sf - j t0"ICIAL A - - 273.)a/ If 50.000 If :3.0" of • - ` OFFICE - LSO of 273. 30 - ;).am of • • sESIt;f1ITIA: S0 units 50 weitt MI writs 100 . lIs 153 vnlls 160 units iW unto CC1t"KIAL 5 i{1.000 of S 1.000 it 131.014 if 10.4.OM of IMMO of ?IT.D06 /f '1$0,OM sl Of►I CC' 35'aw /f 15,000 of 111.O1ti If 75.00O If 190.Me If 43.D40 If 43.0C4 ►f t[SICl1IfIAL 54 unitt 50 %All$ Po wilts 2'00 wits 190 wilt/ III %Atts to wills COOK fee al 6 41,0m if 41.000 if S+s: rW is 1).i,vA If Ss'" It 60.cm If AO,WO If offitt W,OC4 It 0.041 if S,DDO II M,0w Is a0.M0 if 11.0C10 sf INSTIMICO" 10.00 tf 10,0M tr - IDIOM so 10.0W It 24,000 if 4fSICE1t11A1 .S toils 22 w•niIs 491 %mitt 100 watt► 10 .MIti .'N vnsts ?w1 wilts S.1»r[ttlal i J.SL�D ff 7,3r90 at 575.1163 %l 14,G,O at - !4,070 If S41,004 I OFFICE - _ - - - i1O,O40 it 150.4C4 it HIM 50 r-I 50 r•s - 40 two SOLO rwt 4W Cos &M roI (22.5m if) (12.SW ill - (19Q.C4J tft WS.0"J4 if) 0112.000 if) (190,rlOCt if) "E'JM - - - - 12 O.Cnl�9 t f - • C�Jt�IxCIAL 1 - - - - S,C►P(J sf - - (Lr7IN110n Cttt - siS10fXTiAI 154 WrAts 119 wools 1,1f4 welts 1.6m walt1 tm ts+sIt 1,W0 writs 1.40 snot Ctt�[titlLt 4 2S9,Dm WOOD sf WOW if 100,OM it I00.0N of MOIEI 1u rs+► Sat rot 40 r%4 AM rws 800 rot 1.450 too 1.450 fart (Sa.IA?0 sf) 144.K4 of) 0E0.100 if) (1M.COCO IN IJW.000 iN (t.2t1.00C if) 11,10,000 of) tESIUNTiAL in "Its 10 wilts - - - (r*WRCIAL 10 11.W. if 16.0011 - 1S.000 of US.s>CO of IT.MO of 17,SM it ILIUM 1 - - (Intl. •ristln)) CC�fIER�t4s. 11 1.000 tI I.000 tf 1S.000 It 1,00 of PAG It 7.000 of stSt'�cXtIAL Tod rlts 10 "nits 106 "nits 106 wilts 106 emits ' TOTAL CMMAtlAl 2YF.SOtl tf 164,150 if 2.S21.174 it 41d.000 tf 121,000 if ?118.so t.t fill Iwo tt IQt(1. t31 rra" 221 rtt 1,600 r+t 1.1154 roes I, 11 (111's" it) It3Q.9W 11) - (In.03o 1s) (870,300 $l) (1.4mo 0 all CrE30 fait tl} Rt31DVstEAI ', ; SSO ,Nita � f ' t.091.112waltt 110%000 tfvolts W.000is/ JdA,NOO waits�) Yfil. a►1(s . .' ;Kitts 75,000 st 75.�54 t Otl3 11 •►tll[i 1gr•'trtow 90141 Ess11ppe"l fop, tpe '1111r(tts. NfiKl tN sit Md Ions Mt ' (sltsat Code Amendment No. 88-3 AMNISTRA?IYE QRM i 1 .0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Intent The City of Humtington Beach has a well established potential for development. The City is located within minutes of Long Beach, Newport Beach, Irvine, and Costa Mesa, areas which have experienced a great deal of change in the past few years. This location means the City shares a sub-regional market with portions of bn:i Los Angeles and Orange Counties. The Huntington Beach Downtown area has been the subject of many special plans and studies over the past. three decades. The area has a variety of residential, commercial, and recreational uses surrounding an older Downtown core with the Municipal Pier serving as the focal point. Huntington Beach has miles or prime public ocean frontage, with numerous vacant and udder--utilized parcels across from the beach. The potential development sites in the Downtown are sizable and attrlcilve and present various opportunities for corsiderstlon. The City recognizes that market demand will exert pressures for the future development of these parcels. The City must respond to these demands in a manner which %-Ili nchleve the optimum potential while at the same time protecting the existing character of the neighborhoods. 1 - 3- . (0(3G1D� The purpose of the Downtown Specific Plan is to encourage the revitali- zation of this important area Of liuritington Beach. The Plan promotes a mix of commercial. residential, and recreational uses which will be able to take advantage of the area's proximity to the ocean. Many Msct!ons of the ` Downtown project a negative Image of 'Huntington Beach. The effect of these existing conditions is to discourage new Investm:nt, which in turn perpetuates the unsightly and unproductive environment. The principal goal of the Downtown Specific Plan is to change the overall negative image which has evolved through the ye3:s, and establish a framework for the physical Improvements, both public_ and private, which will create an attractive, unique, vibrant and viable community that will make people want to live, work and play In Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan sets forth development standards and recommends public improvements for the City's Downtown area. The Downtown Specific Plan is Intended to implement the land use designations. In the Coastal Eleme i of the Huntington Beach General Plan. This Specific Plan, along with zoning ordinances for those portions of the City's coastal zone. outside the Downtown ar ta, and In conjunction with a Coastal Zone (CZ) suffix. will be the Implementing phase (phase the ee or final phase) of the Local Coastal Prograrin (LCP). Upon certification of these ordinances by the State Coastal Commission, permit authority for most new development will once again become the responsibility of the City of Huntington Beach. 1.2 Specific. Plan.Rmcedure California State law authorizes cities with complete General Plans to prepare and adopt Specific Plans (Government Code Sections 65450 et. seq.). Specific Plans are Intended to be a bridge- between the local General Plan and individual development proposals. Specific Plans contain bcath planning policies and regulations, and may combine zoning regulations, capital improvement programs, detailed development standards and other regulatory methods into one document which can be tailored to meet the needs of a specific area. Local planning agencies or their legislative bodies may designate areas within their jurisdiction as ones for which a Specific Plan is "necessary or convenient" (Government Code Section 65451). The legislative body may adopt a Specific Plan either by ordinance or resolution (Government Code Section 65507). Adoption by Ardinasice is common when the Specific Plan amends a development code. zoning ordinance, or other code, when specific regulatory measures are Included .when local charters require adoption by ordinance. Resolutions art cummt<nly used when the plan Is snore of a policy document. S:,ould the legislative body wish to change_ a proposed Specific Plan recommended by the Planning Commission, the change must first be referred back to, the Commission for consideration, If not prevlouAy cons!eered, (Government Code Section 65504). if the Commission falls to act on the proposed change within 40 days, it is deemed approved. The same procedure applies to subsequent amendments to the plan. ...4.. (0063D) Adoption or amendment of a Specific Plant constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State's Environmental Impact Report (EiR) guidelines. If the initial study chows that the proposed or amended General Plan could significantly affect the environment, the Jurisdiction must prepare an EIR and submit tt in draft farm for public review. The reed for an EIR in a particular case is determined by the iocal government. A Specific Plan and an EIR on a Specific Plan overlap extensively; they must address many of the same concerns and the proces.-c for preparing them is nearly identical. Therefore, environmental assessment should be an Integral part of prep.ring nr revising a Specific Plan. i.3 A33i114TiIY i The State, of California requires that all cities and counties prepare atxi adopt a comprehensive General Plan for the physical development of their f area of jurisdiction. Following the adoption of the General Plan, the entity Is required to develop and adopt regulLting programs (zoning and subdivision ordinances, building and housing cosies, and other regulations), which will implement the policies described in the General Plan. The Huntington Beach City Council adopted the Coastal Element as part of the City's General Plan on January 19, 1981. On March 16, 1981 Coun-b j authorized staff %o draft the Downtown Specific Plan as a means of implementing porticns of the Coastal Element. Following review by the. California Coastal Commsssion, the Coastal Element was amended by the City. Council on August 2, 1982, and certified in geographic part by the Coastal Commission in November, 1982. The Coastal Element was again, amended by the. Council on May 16, 1983. This amendment along with any subsequent amendments brought about by the adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan will be submitted to the Coastal Commission for review and certification. 1.4 The Downtown Specific Plan is divided Into four sequential sectiens. The first section describes the purpose and Intent of the Downtown Specific Plan along with a brief explanation of Specific Plan procedure and authorization. The second section is intended to establish the reasons why the Specific Plan process is logical and necessary for this portion of the City. This section presents a general description of the. Specific Plan area Including designated land uses, existing Zoning and existing uses along with special charac- teristics and existing conditions which make this area unique. Section Three describes the Specific; Plan design concept. .;The design concept evolves from the objectives outlined In Section One and the existing conditions discussed in Section Two, along with` inpUt from`numerous public meetings and special studies corWucted by and for. the City. Section 1lwee also presents the land uses proposed for varlout districts In the f'owntown area and the circulation, open space, public facilities and Infraatiructure which will support the land uses arxi reinforce the .design ' conce:F:. Strategies,''for. phasing the lmplementa tion of these facilities and features , .are otttlinR.d;-to coordinate •the development of ;the Downtown area and achieve the objectives identifled In the City's Coastal Element. -S- (0062D) - _ - _-- —_ - - - -- - -.�.,....�•r:---•1L�,Mbcl,Yr�.wrr�.r..�r.r..r..: : Sectfon Four presents a detailed description of the development standards which are necessary to gulele and regulate new development as well as to carry out the gou!s ami Fx,llcles of the coastal program. The development standards are listed by district enabling easy comparlson. This section also outlines the administra tivi! procedures and general development provisions which are consistent In onll districts ana apply to all development. The Introduction of; special use overlays for resource production and conservation auras are alto presented. An appendix has been compiled which contains the: spacial reports and studies from which mar), of the concepts in this Specific Plan were derived. , this appendix has not he en Incarporved into this document. Also prepared und,!.t- a separate cover is the Downtown Specific Plan Environm- ental impact Report 82-2. i i i i j i l f f 2.0 AREA DESCRIPTION The Downtown area ;s within the City's coastal acne boundary and presents several particularly complex issues which have led to this unique planning approach. This area is characterized by numerous small parcels and dispersed v unerships with as extremely diverse iilx of ac;tivi:es. Many of j the structures were built in :he 1920's; soma are selsmiu,ily unsafe. In addition, a large portion of the area is present:y vacant wlth� a tremendous potential for develop� -ent. The California Coastal Act adds stall another set of considerations to the planning 'proces by requiring that -certain regional and statewide coastal concerns be included in any plans for the area. 2.1 BgUndaL'Y The Downtown Specific Plan Includes the seventeen blacks on tho ocean side of Walnut Avenue between Goldenwest and Sixth Streets, a central area between Sixth and Lake Streets extending up to Hartford Avennue, and properties' generally south of Atlanta Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard (see Figure 2.1). , The Specific Plan area also encompasses the beach between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard, including the municipal p!er. The Specific Plan area includes approximately 336 total acres. ..�_ (0062 n) 2.2 Gengr31 Elan S.ASiM Land use designations for the Specific Plan area were established by the City's Coastal Land Use Plan which was adopted as part of the City's Coastal Element and became part of the City's General Plan (see Figure 2.2). The Coastal Element used many of the: same designations currently established for other parts of the City; in addition new designations which more specifically reflect the intent of the State Coastal Legislation were v1so adopted (VIsitor-Serving Commercial, Mixed--Use (Office/Residential), N'fixed-Use �::orarncrclal/Support Recreation), and Open Space (Recreation). The adopted General Plan designates the seventeen block area between Goldenwest and Sixth Streets primarfly for high density residential use with a maximun allowable dent=ity of 35 units per acre on a fully consolidated block; this area accounts fo- approximately 44 acres. Within this section of the Specific Plan, three nodes are designated for visitor-serving commercial j uses, totalling approximately 8 acres. These commercial modes Inclode a two half blocks between Goldenwest and Twenty-First Streets, and a two half blocks area between Eighteenth and Sixteenth Streets and one half block between Ninth and Eighth Streets. Arnther visitor-serving commercial area is designated adjacent to the municipal pier. This area Includes the five Inland blocks facing Pacific Coast Highway between Sixth and Lake Streets and the pier and,a portion of the public parking lots. The visitor-serving commercial cateoo; Is a new designation created in response to the Coastal Act policy which enec-arages adequate % isitor-- serving facilities in the coastal area. The principal intended uses are hotels, j motels. restaurants, theaters, museums, specialty and beach-related retail, j and service uses. These uses are located near visitor-drawing attractions such as the Municipal Pier and the beaches, and along major access routes from inland areas. Office and resident4., -.ues shall be conditiono] and shall only be permitted if visitor serving uses are either provided prior to other development or assured as part of the development. Inland from the first block, the plan designates fourteen blocks for mixed- use (office/residential) uses, approximately 52 acres. The City's General Plan Includes abroad mixed development category intended to encourage maximum flexibility. The Coastal Element refined the category to provide more direction for the types and level of development desired. Iwo new mixed use categories were developed for the coastal zone. The intent of the mixed-use office/residential designation is''to allc' w a mix of medium to high density apartments and ,condominiums with profesilow.1 office space. This can be accomplished by integrating residential and office uses within the same general area or by vertically mixing these uses within the same building. Limited ancillary retail commercial and service toes are also conditionally permitted; however, the ernohasts is on the office/ residential mix. Southeast of the Downtown core is another visitor-serving commercial area adjacent to Pacific Coas: Highway between make and Huntington 'Streets, approximately 13 acres. The area further. south a'iong the 'highway is another new mixed-use dasignatlon, commercial/rerxeation, approximately 29 acres In sizes. This designation conditionally allows commercial facilities as a major use and recreational facilities as a support use. It is especially ..g-- (0062U) appropriate for large areas :ihich can be planned as one coordinated development. The intent is to encourage uses that are o,.,n to the public and that c:apitaliza on the beach 10catiO4. The areas immediately north of the commercial areas adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway are designated for high density residential uses for a total of 51 acres. Another new designation is open space recreation which will accommodate pamive and active recreational uses. The entire beach area has this designation which encompasses approximately 103 acres. 7.3 Ustino Zoo ne Zoning throughout the Downtown area has evolved over the wears. There are predominantly two types of zoning presently in place, commercial (CJ) and residential, with residential densities vanging from low (Oldtown j Specific Plan) to high (114). E The majority of the property betwe:gin Goldenwest and Lake: Streets is Yonnd C3, general business district (Commrrrr 1). Th!s Includes the front half of the &!venteen block3 between Goldenwest and Sixth Streets and mitt of the central Downtown core area. The C3 zoning district allows a wide variety of u:.,L:� including any use permAttes In the City's three other commercial zoning districts such as retail shops, banks, 0eaters, automobile fates, professional offlce:i. motels, and other uses. The C3 zone imposes ;ew development restrictions; there are no front, side or rear yard setbacks. no maximum percentages of site coverage, no open space requirements rind no height restrictions. The C3 zone fully developed would produce 90 gross acres of general commercial uses within the Downtown area with few design controls. The C3 zone does not provide the type of regulations necessary to Implement the quality of development envisioned for this area and therefore it is no longer an appropriate z;;ne for Downtown. The northern half of the blocks between Goldenwest and Sixth Streets as well as a small portion of the centra! core area ate zoned Ra, Leigh density residential. This zoning district allows one unit foi -every one thousand (1,000) square feet of lot area or a maximum of 35 units per gross acre for larger projects, with a height. limit of 30 feet. There are currently approximately 23 acres zoned R4. The Rd gone Is not specifically designed for the unique tyre of lot configurations and other characteristics of this area. Without modification, Including a greater degree of design controls, the R4 zone may not be compatible with the adjacent Townlot Specific Plan zoning district. Other zone- Specific Plan erne include, . a Hom e � within the S cific ;MH (titouile ' N District), R5 (Office Professional01sitrict) wtdch allows Hotels 'and 'mot t as well as professional of:.ces R3 (Medium-High vensity, Resldentisl nlstrict), Old Civic_ Center Specific I Plan (Nflxed-Use, residential,. oommercial and public fsrilt Ies), Cl (Neighborhood Commercial District), C4 (highway Commercial District) and `,;CF-R (Comiz untty. Faclllties � :District: -- Recreatten Areas). In addition,,;a zoning, suffix of O or 01' (O11 District) is on select parcels. The present pattern of spot zoning with $trip commercial Is a resporse to past demands and no longer applies to the efforts of Downto�n revitaliz:s,tion. --9- (0062D) 2.4 The existing land uses In the Sapcific Nin area are extremely vari^.d and diverse. Thar a are numerous cases of nonconfo.rniing uses and vacant or under-ut:'ixed parcels. • ;n the seventeen blocks between Goidenwast and Sixth Streets development is sparse. Many of the parcels which front on Pacific Coast Highway are either vacant or used for oil pred»ctjon, wh'.le many lets facing Wainut Street are developed as multi-family residences. A few -nmntercirl establishments are also scattered along this strip, which account for approximately 50,O00 square feet of commerc;al use:. The area between Sixth and Lake Streets is often referred to as the Downtown "core." This was at one time the City's .principal commercial center; now, however, it is characterized by smaller Neale uses; surf shops, thirft stores, coffee shops and similar establishments, primarily focused around Maki Street. Many of these Downtown proptroes have exp !need a rapid turnover in commercial tenants. The total amount of cu lmertlat square fmtage presently in the Down'.own core is approximately 160,1100 sere feet. Land uses farther away from Main Street becor,,e more mixed and Include single-:arally and multi-family reslderces, o'_I ac ivitles, and parking lots along with commercial establishments lit the port:.unn tip of the Downtown j core is the old C1vic Center site (presently vacant except fx the City Library) bounded by Orange Avenue, Main, Fifth and Sixth Stream Another residential area exists adjacent to the Downtown cere between 3rd and Lake Streets and is devoted to -2 mix of single and multi-family ;esidential uses. The area along 0e southeaste n boundary cf the Downtown area, east of Lake Street, is largely vacant. Pacific Coast Highway between Lake Strcrt ',and Beach fti4evard oortahu a mixture of activities. Two hotels are located in this area which provide a total of nearly 200 rooms with restaurants, meeting rwr.ns and recreational facilities. Inland between Lake Street and Huntington Street, the lard is :rgely vacant and used for some oll facilities. The remainder of the area is mostly comprise.i of niobile, home t. cy. The ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway Is totally devoted to public torch use. Bolsa Chica State Beach extends southeastward from Goldenwest Street to the Municipal Pier. This area is p;esently undergAng major renovatio:t through a cleaning up and consolidation of oil Operations and a rnapr landscaping and accessway program. The City Beach Iles between the Pier and Beach Boulevard. The area is extensively landscaped un<-1 contains approximately 2,COO parking spaces with carious beach-oriented conce.r.,slons. l?-. �t?i1G2 Clj , 3 2.3 Existing Cod iCIM Oil Production A large number of parcels In the Specific Plan area are currently in oil production. ranging from 25 foot wide lots to parcels several acres in size. Some parcels are owned by the oil companies themselves and some are leased from private owners. There is a possibility that many of these oil production facilities can be covsolidated into smaller areas which would free additional land for development of other uses. A large oil firm analyzed the potential for a unitization project and has taken the initial steps to .,snit formation with the acquisition of mineral rights. This will enable the remaining oil resources to be tapped from one or two select locations and 'herefore eliminate the need for pumping units scattered throughout the Downtown area. Parking Problems d Parking, has long been an issue of great concern within the Downtown area. Part of the problem arises from the fart that many of the Downtown buildings and businesses were develcv)ed or established under the provisions of long outdated parking regulations. Convenient and abundant parking Is a key ingredient for viable commercial development Downtown. Throughout most of the year, the atnouta of parking available in the Downtown area is more than adequate to accommodate the demand generaged by recreation facilities. However, during the summer there are days when parking capacity is exceeded. The provision cf adequate parking for beach users is a significant issue. i Beach parking lots arc currently providing the greatest number of space.,, however, additional parking adjacent to the. beach areas in private lots and along the shoulder of Pacific Coast Highway and otter nearby streets provides an estimated 3,500 spaces. Vacant tots in the area fronting Pacific Coast 141ghwGy between Coldenwest and Sixth Streets currently provide an additional 600 parking sr;tces; use of these lots for parking will phase out as development of t;:e area occurs. Seis,ric Problems Over fifty buildings In the Downtown area have been identified as structurally unsound in the event of an earthquake. Most of these buildings are located in a four-block area in the central core. 'these existing buildings will ultimately have to either be improved to meet seismic standards or be demolished. Municipal Pier Problems In November. 1971). a structural surrey of ►h— Municipal Pler was completed which identified serious structural deficiencies and recommended replace- ment or reconstruction of a major portion of the Pier. The winter storms of 1,783 caused substantial damage to the. Pier, ultimately resulting In the lass c. the "End of the Pier" cafe. The city fa committed to restoration of the Pier because of its special identity and Its relationship to the Downtown area. �1 !-- (006213) Ownership Patterns The Specif?c Plan area between Goldenwest and Lake Streets Is charac- terized by a dispersed ownership pattern . There are a number of 25 foot wide lots held under separate ownerships. In many cases two small lots have been combined to form 50 foot wide parcels. In some instances marry lots have been consolidated to form quarter block, halt' block and even larger parcels. The City owns several parcels between Goldenwest and Lake Streets. including one of the largest consolidated parcels, the old Civic Center site. The property south of Atlanta Avenue between Lake and Huntington Street is consolidated under are private ownership and the 62 acres between Huntington Street and Beach Boulevard is owned by the City. The beach itself is controlled partially by the City (south of and including the pier) and the State (north of the pier). Mair.-Pier Redevelopment Project The majority of the Downtowr. Specific Plan is also within the expanded Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area (Amendment No. M The Main-Pier Redevelopment Project was prepared in cnmplianc:e with the California Community Redevelopment Law which recluire:. preparation of such a plan ar .see basis for subsequent development of a more definite plan amendment for redevelopment within a designated Project AreZ. The Main-Pier Project Area has been determined to be blighted and requiring redevelopment to effectuate the public purposes which the California E Community Redevelopment Law was designed to achieve. i The Main-Pier Project Area is part of the ongoing Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Program by the City of Huntington Beach to revitalize areas within the comrmt nity. The Redevelopment Program will enable the City of Huntington Beach to remove and mitigate adverse conditions within selected areas of the Downtown and help Improve the overall economic climate. The City's objective in pursuing the Niain-Pier Redevelopment Flan is to mitigate the severe development limitations that are now, and will be in the future, corstrairsts to proper utilization of the Project Area. The Plan as presently envisioned will provide for the sale of properties and portions of properties to the Redevelopment Agency. However, if the owners of these parcels are desirous of participating its the project, owner participation arrangements will be made available.. The most direct Impact to businesses and property owners within the Project Area will be the displacement (except for owner participants) resulting from implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. The redevelopment of this Project Area is exp`cted to attain the purposes of Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California by: • Providing additional decent, safe and sanitary residential housing to the existing stock within the City. • Providing construction and employment; opportunities In the development of these facilities and by providing employment opportunities in the operation of the proposed new comraerclal and industrial facilities. -12-- (0062D) f r1JI .•'. U.;:r`. : .,.. . * .' ,.:t. 'sue l: ,'.. ' ` .1. .,,,5 .. . .., ,.f: - . .. efy ,l ..1-...i r l^u"[i*'4►Y iAi . r .. 1 t • • Mitigating severe development llmltatlons which result in the lack of proper utilization of the Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serlous physical, social and economic burden on the community which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterpri acting alone. • Providing adequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or governmental action without redevelopment. • tuaplernenting the construction of adequate streets, curbs, gutters, street lights, storm dralru and other improvements as necessary to ensure proper vehicular and pedestrian access within and around the Project Area. • Establishing development criteria and controls for the permitted reuses within the amended Project Area in accordance with modern and competitive development practices. • Providing for relocation assistance and benefits to amended Project Area businesses and residences which may be displaced, In actor-- dame with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law and the government code of the State of California. I i ' -13- (8067D) r I 3.0 SPECIFIC PLAN CONCEPT 3.1 Qesi&p Conc(-ot The ocean is one main reason for the existence of Huntington Beach and is the basis For its future. The design concept for the Downtown Specific Plan evolves from the ocean as the scioce and center of the City's vitality. Many existing and potential opportunitles in Downtown Huntington Beach are possible because of this relationship to the ocean. The design concept emphasizes the ocean, ocean activities, forms, shapes and colors. This relation to the ocean will establish a theme to serve as a guideline for new private and public Investment in the Downtown area. The design concept concentrates on the City pier, realizing that all other areas within the Downtown are linseed either directly or indirectly to the pier. The level of energy and excitement generated at the pier-head area needs to be capitp.112ed upon and spread through the Downtown Gore. The pier area has the potential to accommodate even more people than It presently does by offering a variety of uses, services and activities. Developments at the pier should be scaled to a pedestrian level with passive activities such as strolling and viewing given equal consideration with more vigorous activities such as surfing, swimming and bicycling. Ped.�2strian boardwalks on various levels and the pier itself will offer views of the ocean and ocean activities. The overall form and shake of all development In Downtown Nunttngton Beuch should allow people to see the ocean vrom as many places as possible. the pier area will continue to serve ag the nta)or attraction In the City and should become the catalyst for the revitalization effort. 1 --14- (0062D) s The design concept Identifies the pler-head and the area immediately acres } Pacific Coast Highway as the focus for the greatest intensity of future development. These new developments should be scaled down and buffered -with intensified landscaping and compatible uses as the development approaches the existing residential neighboncL)ds. The interdependence of public and private development activities will Create a major activity node at the pier-head. An Important emphasis of the design concept Is to extend !Main Street inland from the ocean and encourage pedestrian movement along the street. By expanding this activity fron the pier, the commercial core along Main Street can become a lively shopping thoroughfare oriented to pedestrians and offering opportunities to shop, dine or browse in an ocean-related atmosphere. A second major activity node is proposed for the area bounded by 6th Street, ' Palm Avenue, Lake Street and Orange Avenue. A variety of activities could occur within this "super-block." The activities In Lhis area should b,.. o" a year-round variety, providing the convenience of neighborhood shopping and F the ciL-ntering of public and private services, along with new opportunities r for living within walking distance of the ocean. The prospect o: two major activity nodes within walking distance of each other on opposite ends of the 4 Main Street commercial corridor will tend to encourage reinvestment and revitalization of this important connecting link. I The intensities in the Downtown core area are intended to be compatible with the adjacent trarti tlonal areas and the surrounding residential neighborhojds. Outside or the Downtown core, In the Townlot section of the Downtown Specific Plan (between Goldenwest and Lth Street), :he design concept is for residential and visitor-serving commercial developments, which are intended to be not only compatible with the e.Yisting residential area immediately adjacent, but to enhance atW retalorce the primarily residential character of Vie area. The establishment or a secure private residential community adjacent to. but adequately buffered from, the public areas is one of the objectives of the plan. The area southeast of the Downtown core (between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard) is Intended to provide additional opportunities for residential and visitor-serviag commercial uses. The comercial uses In this area are intended to primarily service the seasonal trade and not compete with the Downtown commercial area. The large consolidated parcels in this area allow for greater Intensities and f densities while still providing substantial opportunities for buffering and design controls. Public open space and recreational amenities should be an Integral part of any large projects, The Intent of the design concept is to incorporate Into the study area a ., 1 physical lma a and identit The design concept is strop peso nixub e y g p accomplished by coordinating several related elements Into an overail ocean design theme, Including the following: Orienting intensive land uses away from established residential neighborhoods. # ..��... (00620) , -- Providing view, light and air corridors to the ocean. - Building architecture to reinforce this theme should be a ;nodern or contemporary Mediterranean style of architecture. This architec- ture has elements of contemporary Mexican and Southern California architecture responsive to the climate and location. The climate and location indicate orientation to the prevailing breezes, protec- tion from sun and wind, view of the ocean, and use of light--color durable materials which reflect sunlight and will be a background to brighter accent colors of streetscape and awnings. The elements of this architecture are: plain wall surfaces built of stucco or blocs.--smooth surfaces, background wall colors from white to pastel shades, Inset windows shaded from sunlight, brightly colored awnings, window boxes, flower pots, light fixtures and other building accents such as entry doors, creation of shade for pedestrians by use of awnings and courtyards, minimum of "reflective" glass. outdoor eating and pedestrian areas to maximize views to the ocean. i i - Streetscape elements should be brightly colored and should relate to the ocean theme in form and shape. The streetscape element is meant to be the accent element in Downtown, played off against the white and pastel of the building forms and shapes. Public areas should be integrated into development proposals in key locations or in conjunction with major consolidation projects. Ocear.-related and oil-related artifacts may be, Incorporated into public areas. Establish guidelines for elements such as sigmage, landscaping, and lighting which will create the visual character of the area. Design Guidelines for the Downtown Specific Plan will be prepared separately and adopted by resolution of City Council. This document should serve as a tool for review of development proposais within the Specific Plan area. -- Gnaphic elements should to bright colors to contrast with the , background architecture. The content of the -raphic elements could be abstract versions of waves, forms of sea animals and symbols and forms that evoke water-related activities with movement and action, to reinforce the ocean theme. - Establishing a framework of landscaping and identify elements to provide interest and character to specific locations. This concept will provide a logical, coherent, unified network of land uses. activities and circulation systems. Landscaping materials for Downtown should be associated with the ocean environment (such as palms) and extensively used for buffering in transitional areas. -16- (0062D) The deign concept is the coordinating, element of the Downtown Specidric Plan and is intended to enhance the architectural concepts with existingr, physical realities and to create a viable environment in which both new aril long-timv residents are able to live, work, shop and re;xeate in a desirable atmosphere. The governing land uses and regulations for this specific plan are contained in the Coastal Element and section 4.0, "Development S tandards." i 1 1 I i i i �I K � Ii 1 1i I1 1 3•' Hai The Downtown Specific Plan area has long served as an area of mixed uses m4-J activities. This area contains the City's initial commercial care and the original residential neighboncv--;ls; along with the recreational and oil production resources which ha%-e contribut.d to the City's identity. T he Downtown Specific Plan projxNses to continue this combination of uses and activities with ]anti use designations which are primarily mi-xed-me I t.�Ws. As identified in Section Two of this document. the City's adopted I. Coastal Elemeni provides for mixed uses in this area; however, the Specific. Plan proposes modificatioris to the previously- adopted land us.� configurations.* The land use designations include: Mixed--Vie (Office/Residential/Commercial), :Mixed-Use (Corn tnerclal/Recreaiion), Commercial (Visitor-Serving), Residential (High Deruity) and Open Space � (Recreation)_ The Specific Plan area Is divided into eleven Districts (see Fights: 3.2). Each District Is unique in character or in parcel conftigtu-ation and each with a different aspect to emphasize:. Several Districts are comp►ased of subdivided blocks containing many small lots in separate ownerships. A few districts consist of large undivided parcels u:tier tutified control. The proposes: land tlse designations anti district configurations are intenders to anticipate development dernatuis and achieve the: optimum potential within the identified design concept. 3.2. 1 ,Mixed-Use (C)ffice/Residential/Commercial) The mixed-use designation is intenders to encourage maximum flexibility for the variety of uses allowed. This mixed-tsse: designation Includes WbAf Lw.Q Districts (District T dt j Five anti Six) totaling approximately � gross acres. �'rS�btbVlF,tAif l�/1c��1 {/�tHPubtl.�f/lf��EltUY/�i>�i/#dttMfsdtl�t's�f/�Z{e�,Ni�t�.f` irr+,t�t��t�tttf,�t`C(�.f/dcti��6ffci/.Jt�E�r'�{��;��tlff�t.�,f�'tl/t�tf/�St`�4iwtf�/tl�l�tflshlrs'�! t�bS�lStSf`t,bG,ids'I,/!7'��,i�Y�klt`�'lfdtclis`.Iti�/riNt'c4�f t4�ci!#�iL �f hill�Erttlzlfd��s�ld3 D�.rtbU�'l F�V�f�ttl�l��'�f�tlt'd 4►�`,tl/�'fit6�l Jf�C'iT!/I��IrlFbth+'/�ihf�Slsl�1�/;t�f.�fl�t�f Flcfdf� �''./�.{t`/ # 'r'�/ ' ff�oyltitldl`fithsl/rU`,EfiK�t�1/tfi t/lt t�;l�ft�li+1 '; trl►s�1 I`JIV �h41!`��BisU1t.#!r�{h���r"�tlsfA3btjs'1�#,cx'.htht?'s��4t'blh/#t�totdAff t�'�t�lr�'����'�f�Ybt7 " Adoption of the Downtown Speiiflc Plan wjM require an amendment to the City's Coastal Elemeoit of the General Plan. t. F , t • �r�/w�r�tlt,�s��u��i/�+�►cr�rd��.r�,r/rdn��crJ,�1�:��.��av�rrlat�l�rd�t��J� 1'f�l�/if�lt4tE.161�%�Y.E�:f t/Nl�b'64filt�hUsitl/41!QG+id',��/dt�i+.f�c!/�lS��fdbft/Il fly dtrLt,�Jd b4f!¢i�P}i Uf'N�f�•l�lfzf lS`a"d/'�/s'w til�/btfd/dbEl�,�l/fd/f l'�htt�tls�t rit�/ 4t�ht d�Vdt'd�ft(btit�J/f7dtdhf�tl.�bll d��ftdhid/btt Rstrit t�f�itSl bt�flyrittlTd ltr�',tY.',fl inl�! t�i'�(�f'/d�/�Yd�ftibb't�s'/1�`J/df Q,�/�bR//l t�lc!E,ttbKt/ltby/tt�tlldt�tr�'r�/�4i`It"�1f/tbiE �6h�t�4hi/`d�hll'//t�€t//At`b+a�///bt!/JPrdfll�,lyit/!l'��r.•d'f l t t?1d!/��hftiftl+E/lhr�ttdtthzbt tS[�+.ttitat.�i 't�l J/11/14f1/PI h�YI s.�"�ibi�.l t'Qd/h��t f l�.tti�I tS![f.rTd t/L;�d/��bhil ribald f t tf,/,1JOi�!/�il�f t c�//f��ll bf/idt t 1'w'tl/s't hllf I�Gll Clt!!/3�StY/rid.4�/h�t�if/�FrUdll(f�1't�//I)'t� feU"6WYA3JW3'�1/Ih.6�W/� (�t.MMI&AWtiMIUAY,ct1'siAU�tf/d1�.3ff�1�1�1/lffhS�/fif Yti6i�fift/�h'�'It{l�:idt rl�t��rit�f�l,�:�JtKEI D'4 di�t6W�l�tbivfl�lddJlYSt��GEIf�dElrtl nLt�fll! t District F��g is the primary commercial core area serving as a commercial link between the pier-head area and District Six (the top of Main Street). District Five includes approximately 20 gross acres with an emphasis on commercial activities, however, an option for office, residential or additional commercial activities above the first floor is provided. This multi-use aspect is intended to create a lively place to be day or night for both visitors and residents. Main Street should maintain a pedestrian- oriented sopping street character. Commercial uses should be required on the ground floor with building fronts close to the sidewalk to establish a more intlin.ite scale. In order to afford the visual. climatic and recreation amenities of this unique area to a greater number of people, higher residential densities should be pro%nded. Offices should be encouraged to locate in this district In order to help establish the desired Downtown i atmosphere. The commercial emphasis of this district can be achieved with varying Intensities, providing the commercial link between Orange Avenue and the pier along Alain Street is not broken at the pedestrian level. This district should encourage rehabilitation as well as new development. The larger scale new development (one full block or greater) should not detract from the potential development in District Six or District Three (the Mier--head). This District is intended to connect the two major Modes with an interest element which can best be achieved with a continuar•ion of the pedestrian- oriented commercial District; rehabilitation and nc!w developed should be scaled and designed with this intent. The plan anticipates that this District can accommodate approximately 150,000 square fact of commercial uses with approximately 75,000 square feet of office and 200 new residential uni ts. DrMbL6V/3?JrefleftfJ wftytith(lhb fibeStt yid etf�{tLlrl�rlte� hf,uYk�dyrYd �l,tb�I�tUt'eft+7�tPdi�lt�r�7ti.�,��lf�f/��icth'�.lE.b��.��.dl¢�b�f�l!/lS�f• ts�l tdb4d, itil�/T►i��t��l,�d l t/�i�iUd//b3'siY.t✓�f�f dl�lttd�lEifr3r/s�dlliB'/`S!%/1bE/�1�YfhP1`dJl1�i� �6y, eY�l/ L4�U�I bUd dlrYkrM,Gf//AtbihfrY';ts.t/hl MWd tth(f l tMW&L/tt Ydttd,8f!/�tbE/,�/�//��ithldby/.�t�+.t�,�.�Ilt6lb�,l,�frd!/i�ttlhf/1�'�l/Ys'J /d�t� fddtb'!�//13/�b'�Nd/�.�r1rSl�ftt/hhftlfldlr4�/trU'�c�ft�/�t��E�li.�Nla��!/a!r'rt'I� ��''�t�'�Y//Lbf/ll�btt�tYd�l///1L�{lY//duff J'd1J/gill/ltltb►iid�Ytlt'6//�rl�ihf 3'd�Jt�iQt�bt d�tdflt�tl�l�'dl,�`I/dtfY�l�/�iS�9'1t�G�ifi�YJdlrVdrd tt'�/1�S/!t �tld� �itr31/�/bb i►.�df b!�!/,t�:rtVr~.�l/171'�tY,�lf/F��tll�d�'./t'�dl�f�/t>�!t's��S/�'PllKl�,i� SEt�f/�tSct.Gb/rit��l6'/sh�t,�c�flt�dcY�+.hr/t�?�1�/El`bidl ��i�,�Ydit/bit�ilb�/�5l`lgt� rdfbrSbft/ftdf/f�tl�lf.�h1t�4�1t,����1/!1'nlllD'x�bsbl/hhutirt�l�l'�f�Sh#tl���Gr1li 1/�Jl��►aw/!dt/,t��lJc.�v�r� z'/l,tbl/t��/ea,���tl�H�sr�t�,�v (uo62D) r t th(SW lsttrlra Six is intendpd to he a nelpl --- aied 1�pIng and ss r�A-urea With 07jblic aathedur. ..upt oven sn s—and plazas, Services such as the 1'brary. lost offlsebanks am thea!n,a should be Iocated hie,... The commercial a ilyl-fle,s Should center around . the nar-round resid n_is and include-_ racery--Rharmacy. harstwa stwas. etc District-,�jx .is�'►a ximately 3- grQSs acres in size ipc uding numerous streets and al_leYS with, a pQLe0t131 hr vicatlon,TWs-sUstrictIs inig dcd to ami. ppQrturdtles for„cw office and-resi_ denda(�v pments ,1 onjl nnc,tim -with thA commerce tLvides. This District njusLb�c sitive In design- a Cale oC new t�adiu&nt residential nelghborb s. District Six provides a great potential to master plan a large portion of the. Downtown area for new development which will create new oppr,rwni►.ies to shop, work, and live in an ocean-related atmosphere. The Plan anticipates that this District can accommodate approximately 130,000 square fee; of commercial, 75,000 square feet of office and 200 new residential units. In both Districts Five and Six, open air commercial establishments, such as sidewalk cares, ^k and magazine racks and flower stands are encouraged. A requirement for additional public open sp;Ace amenities should be f incorporated Into all large scale projects. These areas may include patios, i balconies or terraces with landscaping, public seating With additional amenities such as sculpture cr other art objects. Corner plazas will also be I encouraged along Main Street and should be required In any full block or multi-block consolidation project. 3.2.2 Mixed-Use (Commercial/Recreation) As stated previously, the mixed- use designation Is Intended to encourage maximum flexibility for the variety of uses allowed. The mixed-use (coin merciaf/r ecrea,tion) designation applies only to District Nine. p.i5tri.0 Ntne is an area approximately 29 gross acres In size owned entirely by the City. This District is intended to develop with recreation-oriented ! commercial uses, including tennis and racquetball courts, swimming pools, ! gymnasiums or health clubs. Combined with theses open air or enclosed sports and recreation facilities, hotels or motels with supporting restaurants and shops would be appropriate uses. Large coordinated development is encouraged in this District which provides an ocean-oriented atmosphere with opportunities for public beach .access. The: Plan anticipates commerci;l recreation development with a potential for 300-400 hotel rooms. 3.2.3 Commercial (Visitor-Serving) The visitor-serving commercial designation is a new category adopted in the City's Coastal Element In response to State Coastal Act policy which encourages adequate visitor-serving facilities In the coastal area. The visitor-serving commercial designation Includes four Districts (District One, Three, Seven and 'fen), totaling approximately Sl gross acres. -30- 10062D) i rice-Q is Is composed of three separate nodes of small lot ownerships for a total of approximately 8 gross acres. Commercial uses In this District are Intended to serve the visitors to Bolsa Chica State Beach as well as; the surrounding residents. The commercial uses allowed In this District should not compete with the Downtown commercial core. The District One modes will be surrounded by primarily medium to high density residential uses; therefore, residential uses should be permitted In conjunction with the Pe J necessary visitor-serving commercial uses. This type of mixed use may create an additional incentive for development, while prodding more opportunities for people to live near the ocean. All new development should be designed and scaled to be compatible with the character of the adjacent residential areas. The Plan anticipates service-oriented commercial for a total of approximately 60,000 square feet with the potential for new residential units. Utria Three is proposed to by the hub of the Downtown core, containing higher Intensity visitor-serving, uses such as hotels, restaurants and museums along with speci,slty shops and beach-related commercial uses, District Three includes approximately 15 gross acres and is part of the pier-head node described in the design concept. This District is a prime visitor- serving commercial location directly across from the municipal pier and beach, on either side of ?`lain Street. This location, if preperly developed, will provide visitors and residents with numerous opportunities to view the beach activities and truly experience the ocean environment. District Three is Identified as the most appropriate location for high intensity develop- ment; therefore, large minimum parcel sizes should be established. Hotel, retail, restaurant and other commercial uses %pith structured parking which could also service the pier and Alain Street would be appropriate uses for this District. Development Jr, District Three could be consolidated into multi•block parcels providing for greater design ftexiblUty; however, view corridors should be maintained along the existing right-of-ways. Restaurant and retail space should be developed at the street level on Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway. large areas devote{ to public open space should be provided for within development projects similar to that described for Districts Five and Six. The vitality and magnetism associated w1th such areas will be critical to the reinforcement and continuation of commercial developments throughout the Downtown core. Additional Inducements may be necessary to attract the type of viable development which will support and improve the entire area; therefore, office and high density residential uses should be permitted, however, only as part of a mixed-t:se project and only above the pedestrian level which should remain commercial Anticipating high intensity development in this District requires that additional design considerations be addressed; upper story setbacks, staggered building envelopes, preservation of view light and air corridors should all be included In any project review In order to assure that the area maintain a pleasant pedestrian environment. The design concept calls for an emphasis on pedestrian level amenities and a gradual controlled transition In building he{6:r:s and uses between the commercial core and the adjacent residential uses. (0062D) This concentration of new devk.'npment icross from the pu:,.11c; use areas of District Ten (the pier) wilt provide an economics base for the type of renovation essential to the pier and beach front. This new economic vitality is intended to establish a greater year-round market for the, City to help support the overall revitalization vffor% I The Plan anticipates that District Three can support 400-800 Mel rooms and associated commercial facilities. This District would also be an appropriate location for a performing arts center or multi-purpose facility which could be used by the hotels and the ocean -oriented museum!a-;%lZriuln use identifled In District Ten. This District may also provicie In opportemity for new residential units. Time-sharing residential units may also be a desired use in conjunction with pedestrian level commercial. In rat, approximately 100,000 square footage cl commercial/office uses including hotels and time-sharing residential, along with 200-400 new residential units could be accommodated In this District. Dist i_C1__5&vVn is a consolidated parcel under one ownership and is approximately 13 gross acres. District Seven should be master panned as a primarily visitor-serving commercial project, which could be Implemented over a number of phases. Hotel, motel, restaurant and specialty comet!:clal would be appropriate uses. Development In this District is not intended to compete with the Downtown commercial care: therefore, major incentives for development would not be necessary. The commercial uses in this District would be of a more seasonal variety with the District serving as a connecting link between t`;4 Downtown area and District Nine. The Plan anticlpates visitor-serving commercial can he accommodated with a 200-400 room hotel. Wstdo To includes the area on the ocean side of Pacific Coast Nig1r,�,ay most suited for commercial development. This District includes the pier and the existing parking areas on either side, comprising approximately 15 gross ac.es. The visitor-serving commercial uses most appropriate for this District are beach-related and complementary to activities uhica occur around the pier, such as fishing, surfing and sun bathing. Additional parking in structures would also be appropriate provided that they do not extend above the level of Par:ific Coast Ifighway and block views, This provision should still provide for the optior of multi-level commercial activities in this District. 'The pier Is a prima location ter restaurants, which can take advantage of the panoramic views. Equally impnrtant As the new commercial activities which may be accommodated is to ensure that the major emphasis In this District is public open space. The pier and beach area must remain axessitle to the public for free recreational pursuits. District Ten Is part of the pier-head node. as described previously. This cam mercial/r€creational activity node is of primary Importance in the revitalization effort of the City. Development within this District will probably be Initiated -,mfth City efforts. The extent and intensity of development in District Three and further Inland wiii directly determine the amount of revitalization which can occur to the pier and the. beach-related comercita rases which can be accommodated. In addition, the preseitt amount of parking can be approximately douttled without obstructing views or drastically changing the overall character of the District. -22- (30620i 3.2.4 Residential (High Density) The residential designatia inetudes Wd Q= Districts (District Two, District milt and Eight) exclusively for residential uses. Dist.,,ct Two extends from Goidenwest Street to 6th Street between Pacific Coast Highway to Walnut Avenue. District Two is subdivided into numerous twenty-five foot wide lots with very diverse ownerships encompassing approximately 44 grass acres. District Two is 'intended to develop as a continuation of the type and variety of residential development which exists In the adjacent Townlot 4rea. The development regulations should to similar kind :owpat!ble with those in the Townlot area, with the exception that larger projects (one full block or more) should be provided with additional incentives to encourage lot consolidation. Consolidation of the numerous small lots which are spread throughout the District is one of the objectives of the Plan. In order ;o accomplish this, the allowed density in the District should increase w: the aarcel size inereases. Consolidation is desirable in this District as a means to achieve the design contro.s and variety of residential t,✓pes which will produce quality residential development which is se.isitive to the adjacent neighbors' concerns. Multi-block consolidations may a.so be allowed to promote better design'. however. view corridors should be maintained along the existing right-af- ways so as to not adversely affect the residential a:eas further inland. Projects of one full blocl•: or greater should be allowed additional height in which to achieve the allowed density with a design which takes advantage of the projects location while remaining compatible with adjacent uses through upper story se.becks an,--4 other design regulations. The Plan ai:ticipates that few projects will be able to take advantage of the provisions allo:.!ei-f for a full block cersolidaticn. Residential development in District Two may result in 800-1000 new residential units. Oil uses should also be allowed to continue In designated areas. iet�n i.ly co rn m t: Li~vt i c�ias.� _; .fStzr UL the s:idWim _anal awmitQ1sTrely Sag 3-zcrgs whisLwi I v Siwd-cnd rvJx_JQ ry idential 1 ...lh �i+� ILii�iR3S Lhs73.1�i Sj1ScI�l�f Cal. 4llldIlSdat IR-RC b&d...mum-a-.bilfer are" to e nttiis .ems ]_c�an�.sl��c:.r.r� ,lwe. ram.the.1 _ :szwtl ou-mnd.Ahe ��cen ar_e4,C., DisiriCt al; coisists of two large parcels each of which is under one ownership, for a total of approximately 57 gross acres. District Eight is located in the northeasterly section of the Downtown Specific Plan. High density residential uses are most appropriate for these sites due to their location and unique characteristics. Projects, if properly a. able #/ill be able to maximize view opportunities -.r;d access to recreational amenities. The two project areas within the District should be master planned (separately) prior to any s0division. -23- (0062D) Mew residential development, adjacent to the Downtown commercial core will provide the proposed commercial uses with the population base necesttary to create viable services. The new residential development should also b► designed to be compatible with the residential areas to the north. The plan anticipates development In District Eight to achieve the full poten;aal of niaximum density resulting in 1800 new residential units. Oil uses should also be allowed to continue in selected islands within a portion of the District. 3.2.5 Open Space (Recreation) The open space designation constitutes an imporr,Artt land use throughout the coastal zone and particularly in the Downtown Specific Plan. The open spare (recreation) is a new designation developed in the Coastal Element in keeping with State Coastal Act policy concerning shoreline access and recreation facilities, District Elevc is dexina:ed open spare (recreation) and Includes the area on the ocean side of Pacific Coast Hig,'tway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard, with the exception of the area in District Ten; a total of l approximately 103 gross acres. This District is intended to preserve and protect the beach area within the Specific Plan. Only beach--related i activities should be permitted in this District. Th-- popularity of the beach f and the expectation that beach use wi i continue to increase in the future, makes it important that the Specific Plan preserve as much of the beach as possible. It is also important to provide facilities for beach users, such as restroom facilities and concessions for food, drhtks and beach equipment as well as maintaining as much public parking as possible. All development should be scaled and limited to enhance and not detract from the beach experience. , The Plan anticipates !e%,elapment within this District to be 11M. ltfd to concession stands, recreation facilities and beach parking improvements. Oil uses should be allowed to continue: in a portion of the District. The City has historically had a policy to preserve its beach frcr.t for the enjoyment of all. The Downtown Specific Plan con;�Onues this long-standing tradi-doet insuring safe and convenient access to the beaches within this District. j (0062 D) I 3.3 Circulsation The provision of adequate transportation Is an important concern for any development program. The Downtown Specific Plan calls for the use of a variety of transportation modes to facilitate the convenient and efficient movement of people In and near Downtown Huntington Beach. Beach goers, commuters, Downtown shoppers and local residents all share the circulation ;system, and each has their own transportation needs. The Downtown Specific Plan atteripts to previde a circulation system that better accomrnc►dates all users, with the following abjectives: -- Provide convenient access to the beach and to Mach parking facilities. - Improve safety and efficiency of the existing circulation system. - Provide convenient access to Iocal busness encouraging shopping on Main Street and in the other commercial Dist^cts in the Specific Plan area. -- Facilitate commuter traffic on Pacific Coast Highway by minimizing cross traffic anI providing alternative roures for local residents and shoi�pers. - Provide adequate parking for shoppers patronizing Downtown commercial establishments as well as for residents and visitors. Provision rjf beach parking a especially important to ensure that beach users do not comp ze with shoppers for parking spaces, making access to comcnerciai establishments inconvenient. Encourage and accomracdate public. transportation. -- Accommodate a bikieway system that encourages the use of bicycles fc- everyday transportation as well as for recreation. Provide a pedestrian system that Is safe, pleasant and convenient. 3.3. 1 automobile Circulation The City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways differentiates a arterials by their street widths and capacities (see Figme 3.3-1). "Major" arterials have a' `planned street HOW of 120 feet and have an eptimum capacity of 45,000 vehid" ;per day. w25w 0 0 6 ;1 f� "Primary" arterials are planned at a ROW of 100 feet and can optimally accommodate 30,000 vehicles per day. "Secondary" arterials are planned at a ROW of 80 feet and can optimally accommodate 20,000 vehicles per day. Local streets are not shown on the Circulation Plan, but they are an Important part of the overall circulation system. The ,an_Dir o Freeway, an Important route outside the Downtown Specific Flan area, parallels the coastline approximately six miles inland and connects Huntington Beach with other communities throughout the region. Ancess to this freeway is critical and may be an important constraint to future development along the coast. Beacuse of its proximity to the shoreline, the Specific Elan area is in a less-than-ideal situation in terms of freeway accessibility. Being far from the freeway it is presently !inked by only a limited number of arterials, segments of which are congested at � times. I The Downtown Specific Plan has attempted to de-emphasize the. area's reliance on the freeway in terms of future growth by encouraging higher E density and mixed- use Districts. in the Downtown. In addition, the concentration of pfople and activities into a compact area helps to make mass transit more viable than In scattered locations. Thus, while the Downtown is not Ideally located in terms of the freeway. actions are being j i%ndertaken to ameliorate this situation. The improvements proposed for the Downtown Specific Plan area are intended to augment the capacity of the existing circulation system and to increase Its safety and efficiency. GoldelLw„� ,� re wand � ar .5'A"'&v,atJ, located at either end of the Downtown Specific Plan area, are the major arterials connecting; the coastal area to the freeway and inland communities. Based on the resign and capacity criteria traffic on. Brach Boulevard currently exceeds that street's optimum capacity from Warner Avenue north to the freeway. Existing traffic on Goldenwest Street is riot as great as that on Beach Boulevard; however, the optimum capacity of this street is also exceeded from McFadden Avenue north to the freeway. The initial focus of the plan is to Increase the accessibility of the coastal area to the freeway. The Orange County Transportation Commission and the City are studying the area between Gothprd Street and Beach Boulevard as a possible location for a transportation corridor. Along Beach Boulevard alternative modeti to the automobile are being considered as well as ways to increase autorncoblle capacity through different loading techniques. pa.QWC_CA,1st Highway (PCH) Is the major traffic carrier In the Downtown Specific Plan area. Running parallel tc the shoreline, It provides the pri»ciple access route connecting Huntington Beach with adjacent coastal cities. This four-lane highway, currently designated as a priraary areterial, Is proponed to be upgraded to a major status. PCH should be Increased from four latest to six. 'fhe California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) has proposed to achieve this by simply removing all parking along the curb to fully utilize the existing curb-too--curb width. .this will Increase the capacity of PCH to that of a rnr0or arterial within the existing 100' right-of-way. _26-- (0062D) Traffic volume on PCH creates one of the most significant circulation problems in the Downtown area. A variety of Improvements to Interior streets as well as to PCH are proposed to help reduce congestion. Accidents along PCH are also a serious problem. One of the reasons for the high accident rate is the large number of pedestrians corning to the beach frora inland areas, crossing PCH at mid-block or at nonsignalized inter- secdons. Another hazard is created by automobiles turning from PCN to numbered streets, and from numbered streets to PCH, at the non-si gnat iZed intersections. Curb--side parking on PCH creates another source of accidents. Several actions can be taken to improve these conditions. First, a compre- hensive signalization pattern, will better control vehicle access onto PCH. Second, the number of streets with access to PCH should be reduced. This can be achieved by cul-de-satins or in some areas creating parking bays in the existing street right-of--way. The following streets are possible locations for restricted access: 2nd, 3rd, Sth, 7th, 8th. 10th, 12th lath, 15th, 16th, 18th, 19th, 21st and 22nd. In multi-block developments, access to the project could be taken from existing streets but through-traffic, should be discouraged. A third method to control access is to construct a raised landscaped median along the entire length of PCif, with openings only at through-streets and signalized intersections. Such a median could better separate traffic and be designed to inhibit pedestrian raid-block crossings. Fourth, reducing on-street parking along PCH will help eliminate another source of serious accidents. Fifth, construction of overpasses at key locations along PCH would provide safe pedestrian access, and reducing interruptions to the automobile traffic flow. Finally, prohibition of curb cuts on PCH could also help reduce accidents. This strateZy requires alternative access points for new developments. In the area between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard, the proLwsed Walnut Avenue extension could serve new developments. ?northwest of Lake Street, additional dedication should be required to increase the width of the parallel alley, so that access can be taken from the allay and not directly from the highway. data Avenue should serve as an Important route from Beach. Boulevard to the Downtown core and the City beach. This arterial should be planned to connect with Lake Street and Orange Avenue to form an inland route which can be used as an altemative to Pacific Coast Highway. The intersection of Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street and Orange Avenue should be set aside for additional study. QG-1Ilg�., r venter - Atlanta Avenue should service the Downtown core as a primary arterial, however, the continuation of Orange Avenue into the Townlot area should remain as oii;y one lane in each direction. The use or some type of traffic control device may be required at the intersection of Orange Avenue and Sixth Street to divert the Downtown traffic away from the residential areas. This intersection should be set aside for additional study. So-anteenth.. 1rsetand Lake Str 1 are the existing primary arterials leading Inland from the beach area. These routes should continue to serve as primary arterials, with only one lane In each direction. Sixth 'Street is proposed as a secondary arterial which will establish the northwestern boundary of the Downtown core. Sixth Street extends Inland from PCH`to -27- (0062 p) r i Main Street near Acacia Avenue, and should replace fM1Ltreet which Is presently designated as a secondary. The remaining local strews form 'a grid pattern through the Townlot and Downtown areas, and should conttnv.e to serve primarily local needs. Main Street is a more significant local route which run, through the center of Downtown core and is in direct line with the municipal pier. Its relationship to the pier and the Downtown core make Main Street the most Important visual/pedestrian corridor In the Downtown area. Main Street's role as an automobile carrier within the. Downtown should be de-emph.,s1z'ed with primary concern focused on pedestrian circulation. Main Street -should continue inland from the Downtown core as a local street with one I.ane of travel in each direction. Consideration should be given to connecting I JndJaWpQ'� Avenue, designated as a secondary arterial, with Main Street and the Downtown area. The Intersection of ?Main Street and Sixth Street with a possible Interconnection to Indianapolis Avenue via Lake Street needs additional study. CsId Urd._:IrCel also provides a logical trarmNrtatlon corridor, with 3 convection at Main Street. Modes other than automobilef, should to 1 considered. The Southern Pacific Railroad maintaing an ope:rab a line along this corridor, (north of Ga.JIcId Avenue) connecting to the Pazifie Electric right-o'{-way which runs parallel to Lake Street (south of Garfield Avenue) into this Downtown. These routes may be critical to the efficient movement of' people through the City In the future. A t_Yalnl t AvgnUesten ion, could serve as another inland route to connect Beach Boulevard and Lake Street. if possible, this route snculd be designed to tie into any future extension of Hamilton Avenue west to Beach Boulevard. Right--of--way dedication for this purpose should be required In new developments In this area. This street could provide safe arid, convenient access to the commercial areas east of Lake Street and wn alternative to PCH. 'Total right--ol-way width for this service road should be 100 feet (primary arterial) to accommodate fe►ur traffic Ianes. a landscaped median, landscaped parkway, sidewalks and bike lanes. wt should also serve as an inland route from PCH and should remain as a secondary arterial highway. Delaware Street should connect with Huntington Street and ultimately with PCH at the present Intersection of Huntington Street and PCH. Long range development in the Downtown area -may require vacation of streets to accommodate multi-block -2evelopments. Some possible locations for abandonments would be the first block of Fifth. Second and Third Streets. In the area bounded by Orange, Palnr, Lake and Sixth a "super block" development :oncept Is being consider ed. This would require vacation of ntrarly all streets withlit District 6. Proposed improvements to the circulation system can be provided by utilizing a combination of funding sources. Some projects, such as the PCH re-striping project, qualify to be at least partially funded by State and Federal highway monies. Other improvements, such as cul-de-sacs and the proposed Walnut Avenue extension, could be financed through 'tax Increment - era. ti 3 monies from redevelopment. Assessment Districts provide another means to fund street improvements. These Districts are designed to charge developers and property owners who will directly benefit frDrn the improvement. In cases where additional right-of-way is needed, dedication requirements can be placed on new developments as a condition of approval. The: future development of commercial uses in the Downtown will depend on the ability of the circulation system to move people through the area efficiently. The Circulation Plan of Arteriai Streets and Highways should be amended to reflect the proposed changes as discribed in this section (see Figure 3.3-3). 3.3.2 Parking The provision of adequate parking is vital to the successful operation of any commercial area. Residents, businessman, visitors, and planners each have different definitioc>s of the word adequate when It pertains to parking. The procedures used to develop and control parking spaces in typical urban areas vary appreciably and at times become rather complex. Parking strategies for the Downtown Specific Plan area, for both normal residential and commercial requirements, are complicated further by the proximity of the beach and the different types of parking needs of beach uses. Although no formal parking strateg;• has been prepared by the City, consideration has been given to various procedures which could tx used to identify and satisfy the parking needs of different types of parkers. i Parking spaces for Downtown shoppers should be provided at a limited number of curb spaces, in off--street parking lot.; and In parking structures located within or immediately adjacent to the Downtown area. Parking c:ontrals, such as time limits and parking rates, should be adjusted to maintain the desired use; of these spaces by shoppers and employees. The location of parking in relation to Downtown commercial areas is constrained by the availability of land, its high cost (either in dollars or in lost opportunitle ) and the distance which people are willing to walk from centralized lots or structures to reach their destination. Studies have shown that In order to receive optimus;t utilization by shoppers, a parking facility should be within 300 to 400 feet of the commercial use which it serves. For workers, or other people who are parking for the whole day, the distance can be as great as. 1,500 feet. These constraints must be considered when evaluating possible locatiors for parking facilities. A possible site for a structure would be the City-,owned property located south of Orange Street between Fifth and Main Strea!ts which consists of 10 consolidated lots. This would be an excellent location for servirig future Downtown development. Other parking facility sites within the Downtown core may be needed, depending on the consolidation patterns and intensity of uses which develop there. As specific projects are developed, such as hotels, commercial, office and/or residential complexes, their Individual parking needs will be Identified and satisfied through the construction of specific and related parking facilitici. These parking spaces should be controlled to varying degrees and not open to general public use. -29- (0062D) New commercial and restaurant development on the beach side of 1P'aciflc Coast Highway, on or adjacent to the pier, should be constructed on top of a decked parking structure which could be open to the public and would provide parking for a variety of patrons of the pier facilities, the restaurants, the commercial establishments along Main Street, and the beach users. Since the periods of peak parking demand for these different types of users vary to some extent, the utilization of the parking structure will be improved and parking revenues from It will be increased. Although a large number of parking spaces are now provided for beach users, there Is a shortage during periods of peak partronage and drivers attempt to find open, and free, curb parking spaces in residential and other areas inland of Pacific Coast Highway. Consideration should be given to the Luc of remote parking areas and jitneys or other means of direct transportaion to and from the beach. While this procedure is not considered to be viable at this time, it Is planned that continuing efforts will be made tc, develop this type of service. The replacement of beach parking lots with structures provides a means of Increasing capacity without sacrificing additional valuable beach rpace. This action is expensive, however, and is not felt to be economically justifiable at this time since additional beach parking is presently required only during a limited number of peak weekend hours a year. Much of the presently vacant land fit the Townlot area. however. is now used for parking purposes by beach users and this land will be absorbed into development projects. When that occurs, thousands of future beach users will be required to find other parking spaces. Consideration should be given to the possible development of joint use p.arYfng structures adjacent to the beach area. The owners of residences and their guests frequently encounter problems due to the intrusion of beach users Into residential areas in search of parking spaces. While the closing of various streets between Walnut Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway may alleviate this Condition to some extent; It will not completely solve the problem. Public participation in providing parking could help to encourage uses which otherwise would not be viable. For example, the City could participate in forming parking assessment Districts, or could donate land (such as street vacations) or write--down land costs for the construction of parking structures. Merchants could then lease spare In these structures. on an annual fee basis or by setting up a system of validated parking. .As new development occures, each developer could be assessed an In-lieu fee to offset the costs of building parking structures ttearby, this satisfying parking requirements. Additionar parking opportunities may also be developed into the blunt top landscaping project presently under Phase one construction. ,Subsequent phases to this project could Include surface parking between 9th and t 1 th streets, parking pockets along Pacific Cust Highway and parking structures on the; oil service 'road below the bluff face, where they can be screened from the highway and not block ocean views. -30- (0062D) Financing strategies are Important considerations for actual implementation of parking structures. Parking structures could be provided by the private sector, however, the: problems of assembling large parcels tinder the present fragmented ownerships and the difficulties In bringing a large number of parties together cooperatively, makes this option difficult to achieve. One form of public participation In Parking would be a ioint effort by the City and private interests. The City could build structures with "in-lieu" fees and allow a private company operate the structures for profit. The City might receive a portion of the revenues to retire any debt. Ir:-lieu fetes could substitute for the provision of on-site parking by new development. f These fees would be paid to a fund administered by a City parking agency which would obtain sites and construct parking structures. In-lieu fees provide dollars for capital improvernents, but not for on-going operation and maintenance. One approach to covering these expenses Is to require continuing responsibility for off-site parking by those developments which originally contracted for It by charging ,yearly fee.-, based on the number of ided.rov spaces s and maintenance could also be P P supported In part by charging parking fees to users. These fees could be paid either by the patrons directly or by the businesses Through validating parking tickets for customers. Even with some form of parking fee, however, operating and maintenance costs may be so high that additional subsidy would be required. Another mechanism for providing and maintaining parking facilities Is the formation of an assessment District. An assessment District can be created by the City Council's adoption of a resolution following a public hearing for which all the property owners of record within the proposed District have received notification. If written protests are received from more than 50 percent of the property owners, the Council may not proceed with formation of the District unless four-fifths of the Council concur. An assessment District may issue bonds In order to finance Improvements. Other combinations of financing and maintenance strategies could be devised which utilize features of both in--lieu fees and assessment Districts. Through redevelopment in the Down tow rv'Specific Plan area, tax incretaent financing Is also available and constitutes another option for funding. 3.3.3 Public Transportation The existing public transportation system consists primarily of Orange County Transit District (OCTD) bus service; however, Greyhound, airport and other charter bus companies also operate In the Specific Plan area. The OCTD currently maintains bus lines on a regular basis throughout the Downtown area. OCTD ph :zners, in conjunction with the City's Development Services and Public Yorks Departments, determine the need for improvements to the existing bus system. Currently, existing bus routes within the Specific Plan area are sufficient. Expansion of the system would involve more buses or more frequent trips on existing routes. The most lii:ely change to the system in the near term will be a seasonal increase In the number of bwes running on the beach-oriented routes. -3l- (00610) As prijects are filed improvements to the existing transporatlon system can more acurately be determined. These improvements can then be recommended to OCTD planners for their review. Any proposed modification to the system must be approved by OCTD prior to being attached as a condition for project approval. At the present time bus routes enter the Downtown area %!a Atlanta Avenue, Lake Street, Main Street and Orange Avenue, and move through the area on either Olive or Walnut Avenur.. Additional bus service which sloes not actually enter the Downtown area is provided along Pacific Coast Highway. Future bus traffic should circulate around the Downtown core area using 6th Street, Pacific Coast Highway, Lake Street and Orange Avenue, except those now traveling only along Pacific Coast Highway. This will provide service to both the Downtown and the beach areas. U a transit center is developed at the intersection of take Street and Pacific Coast Highway, all Downtown buses would pass the location and transfers would be facilitated. In addition to the buses and the routing system, support facilities are needed to make the transit system efficient and convenient. In late 1979. the City of Huntington Beach, in conjunction with OCTD, conducted a study to analyze sites for a transit center where people would have centralized access to numerous bus routes and where drivers could rest and buses could be temporarily stored. The report concluded that two such centers should be developed: one at vothard Street near Huntington Center and. one at Like Street near PCH. The latter facility, which is within the Specific Plan area, would be for the routes ser.,ing beach visitors and persons patronizing the Downtown commercial establishments. Special requirements for the center were based on current bus arrivals and departures and on the frequencies projected for 1995. A total of 12 to 14 bus bays would be needed to meet maximum projected summer traffic during the next decade. The center would also inclurle a passenger waiting area with a 5,000 square foot platform, which would he large enough to safely accon, modate the large number of riders an a typical summer weekend. Presently, the curb-side: parking lane on the south side of PCH, cast of Lake Street, is rased for beach-route bus layovers. Upon ciompietion of CalTrans' PCH restriping project, however, this section will become a travel lane; thus, a new location for the layover area will be necessary. A new lay-over facility could be developed immediately adjacent to the existing site and seaward of the existing right-of-way between PCH and the beach parking lot. The new layover area shoWd coru!st of an expanded passenger waiting platform, additional accessways to the beach, and a curb cut to provide a turnout for bus parking. The proposers project would necessitate the removal of some landscaping; however, it will not require the loss of any parking spaces. In addition a bus stop/bay should be provided northwestbound at Main Street. -32- (0062D) Thts !ayover area should be adequate for OCTD's beach-related transit center needs as currently projected to 1995. However. if the Downtown develops into an attractive tourist area with higher density mixed--use development, it ;s likely that a larger public transit facility would be necessary in the future. The Specific Plan recommends that the option for - such a center be preserved now because of its potential importance to the longterm transportation needs of the area. One passible location for the transit center would be the City property south of Orange Street between Sth and Main Streets. j As previously mentioned, this site is an excellent one for a public parking structure and a transit center could easily be incotporated Into the same building. Another possible location would be somewhere in or near the "super block" (District 6). Because the City Is considering vacating streets in this area, there is potential for providing public land for such a facility. Locating the transit center at a Downtown location such as this one would be advantageous for shoppers and would Increase pedestrian activity along Main Street. Other locations could be possible and any larger-scale parking struc:• ire built with public assistance should be designed so that a portion could be converted to such a public transit center in the future. While the existing transportation system i.s limited to buses, future transportation systems may Include rail or monorail service to the Downtown Specific Plan area. Orange County, along; with other regional jurisdictions, is currently studying possible transportation corridors. Mthin the City of Huntington A_,ach. the existing Southern Pacific Railroad ROW through the industrial corridor along Gothard Boulevard could be utilized for passenger service. The Pacific Electric Railroad ROW parallel to Lake Street may also be available for some kind of alternate transit system. The Orange County Transportation Commission is also studying the Beach Boulevard corridor. The use of this artery for modes other than cars or buses could provide the Downtown ,area with a vital regional link.. Such systems must be developed on a regional basis, creating a greater-than-local network. One important consideration in encouraging mass transit is the creation of an activity center which attracts enough people so that a ma:,s transit stop or station is practical. The Orange County Transportation Commission is currently studing alternative transportation procedures which could be used to improve travel flows in a Beach Boulevard corridor which extends frn;n the ocean on the south to La Habra on the north and lies between Valley View Avenue on the west and Euclid Street on the east. The alternatives bAng studied Include Transportation System Management (TS`!) procedures, some "flyovers on Beach Boulevard and less capital-intensive improvements on other arterials, major highway Improvements at critical locations, a freeway which would ,generally follow Beach Boulevard, bus improvements, high-occupancy vehicle/bus lanes, and light rail transit. Preliminary data rrom the study, Including such factors as cost and affected residential/commercial structures and properties, are now being analyzed in an effort: to dett~rrnire which alternatives should be given further detailed study and evaluation. -33- (4062D) 3.3.4 Bike Trails Bicycle transportation is growing Into a very popular and important meaty of travel. Several bike trails exist within the Downtown Sp,cific Plan, the foremost being the coast line trail. This recently completed bikeway begins at the north end of Bolsa Chica State Beach and travels south through the City Beach and Huntington State Beach to the mouth of the Santa Ana l:,lver where it connects to other coastal and Inland trails. The trail Is completely separated from PCH, (class 1), eliminating the hazards created by bikes and automobiles sharing the same right•-of-way. The proximity of the Coast trail to the ocean makes It a very pleasant ride, affoeding beautiful �4ews of the coastline along its entire length. Within the Specific Plan area, the coast trail 's connected to two Inland bike tails, which extend along Seventeenth Street and Lake Street. These trails consist of striped bicycle lanes incorporated into the existing scree: right-of-way (Class 2). Major improvements to the existing bikeway system In the Speritic Plan f area have teen proposed In the City's master plan for bikeway-s, Including new routes along Atlanta Avenue and Goldenwest Stre .. Priorities for bikeways are established by the City arw• lmpro�-emznts and a;1di.', ns to the bikeway system are budgeted annually. Another important project Is the construction of a bicycle path crossing under the Santa Ana River Bridge at PCH. Although not within the Specific. Plan boundary, this crossing will provide a crucial link between the Santa Ana River Trail and Huntington Be:ch bike trails. Currently, the only means for bicyclists to cross PCH is with the traffic signal at Brookhtirst Street. The undercrossing will proulde a .much safer ard more direct connection, making a more effective bicycle transportation system for Inland cyclists to reach the beach. A new trail should ue developed along with the Walnut Avenut extension, connecting. Downtown to the ca.-nmercial/recreation area near Beach Boulevard. The old Pacific Electric right-of-way should also be developed as a new trail linking the Inland residential area with the beach. The funding for most bike trail improvements comes from S9 $21 monies. which are distrbuted through the Orange County Trans-portntlon Commission to local governments. Projects are budgeted on an annual basis. The costs of projects vary considerably depending on their nature,. Completion of all the Improvements are expected In a timely manner consistent with the City's overall master plan. 3:.i.5 Pedestrian Circulation In the Downtown area, walking should be an important mode of transportation. litany people will park their cars a greet distance from ale beach, pier, restaurants and P.-tall stores they are patronizing. Mixed-use zoning will encourage the development of places where people can live, work, shop and be entertained in ore area. Far this reason, the pedestrian circulation system warrants special attention. —34— (0062D) iT.,.1T .—.. ,. ''t'C. a.. t ,, ire+— _ .. .• A system of pedestrian pathways in the Downtown area would serve several purposes simultaneously. First, It could be par: of a public recreation system. People like to walk and enjoy the sights Wong the bluffs, the beach. and the pier, or watch the activity ;n lively commercial areas. The: pedest:ian circulation system also serves as a practical tranuportation mode, which will be increasingly important to future commercial Districts, with centr.lized parking areas and nearby res'"dential, comrarrcial and office developments. The pedestrian transportation system will be, especially vital In linking the beaches, blufftop landscaped area, and the pier to inland visitor-oritented commercial Districts. In all rases, the pedestrian system must be safe, pleasant, and convenient. One of the most important pedestrian routes is the lateral access along the shore. In the Downtown Specific Plan .area, the entire s'wreline is open to the public; with the exception of one residential complex northwest of the pier, there are no private developments between PCH arA the ocean. Continbouy pedestrian access Is provided along the Public beach. There is also a continuous hard surface pedestrian router or sidewalk along PCH between Reach Boulevard and Coldenwest Street. on addition, the coast hike trail prnvides a lateral accessway extending the ent -e length of the Specific Plan area, which is also designed for handicapped persons using wheel:-hairs. Special pedestrian features should also be planned ;or the Main Street corridor, Main Street should be a lively, active commercial District at die :::reef level. The first floor of developments along Main Street sho•ild 6e Qnmercial, with open-air establishments encouraged. Structures should be built !Cong a continuous retail facade near the sidewalk. The sidewalk- should be wide enough for convenient passage, but relatives intimate so g p g � Y that pedestrians will be near the stores and the retail fronts will demand their attention. Mein Street should remain one-way with limited vehicular access and parking. Corner plazas should be required with large consolidations to provide places for people to sit and relax. The plazas could provide an entry way to the Main Street corridor and commercial District. Sidewalks should be required on all public right-of-ways, providing a basic m 1 and comprehensive pedestrian network. In some District-, dedication may be required for public parkways and sidewalks. { One of the major challenges :o the pedestrian system Is providing safe access across PCH. This connection is especially important for visitor-oriented commercial areas which rely on them- proximity to the beach and pier as an amenity to drn-.. customers. Provision of safe and convenient pedestrian crossings Through a series of traffic signals and overpasses should be oncow-aged. The median along PCH should be designed and landscaped corwlstent with the Downtown them,.! and should discourage mid-block pedestrian crossings. Th% median sirsuld Fe unbroken except for Intersections with traffic signals. Overpasses or underpasses might be especially Important In the commercial/recreatl^n Districts where hotels are proposed. A direct. conveniem connection to the popular City beach could be an important feature In the success of such developments. Overpasses could hJe designed —35— (0062D) E�F> for. use ;,by the Sener7l Public, and a direct connection for,, ht)tel developments, providing convenient beach access. Overpasses may also provide Convenient connection between commercial and' public: facilitles, like a hotel and museum. The importance or tying the Main Street corridor to the Mcnlrapal Pier;:a's part of a, unifled vl,itor-oriented commercial District suggests; the need for a 'grade rteparated pedestrian crossing at Maln Street. Six lan►n of highway+ will seplirate the pier and the Downtown commercial Drat ict, a;traff it signal can only periodically pro%ide safe access. If the commi-rcial'Districts are successful. pedestrian volume will Increase,in this area. This will require the signals near the Downtown to provide increasingly lrsiger aind more frequent. traffic stops to facilitate pedestrian mavement, d1srup0na automobile 'flow on PCH. Thus, the advantage of an averpas:: at this location would be to provide for a continuous physical connection., between Main Street and the pier, while not obstructing vehicular, trafff.c. As an alternative to an overpass, an underpass could be consider►ad In ccsnjunctlon with some well-lighted perepheral shops which would reduce the ttmnel effect. The major farilides which could require significant'public participation develop are the overpasses. Costs can be reduced by the use of publicly owned land on both sides of PCH. Fublic, funds such is Coastal Conservancy grants can be used to help build these kinds of facilities, and in many instances the proposed overpasses can be asnstructed with a combination of public and private monies, Funding soaurces include to:-, increment, special assessments on serviced properties, State ,grants, :the municipal general funds, earmarked fees at -City and State beaches, development incentives, and contributions by OC i D as part of' a transit center. --'16- (0062D) 3.4 Qpen Space The open space ,framework Is comprised of focal points, Districts and entry nodes Interconnected by pedestrian and vehicular corridors. Each District ,and focal ' point accommodates a distinct mix of pedestrian/vehicutar activities, events and landscape base with a .hierarchy of use and visibility. Physical design elements in each space or corridor are Intended to enhance the viewer - experience to create an Interesting environment. The p7oposed open`spaces'and landscape concepts are -a means of coordinating design which is both supportive f of and independent of the architectural forms. The major objective is to unify open space and physical strucrilres into a homogeneous "sense of place" or community of distinct Districts with a common theme. The design concepCdescribes an area--wide landscape framework In order,` to create a positive unified image through'landscapin& Landscaping,will visually tie together the diverse built environment and Introduce: a softer, human element into the harder surrounding architectural elements. It Mso Is intended to provide diversity, contrast and color In -.n ocean-oriented environment. Existing landscaping in the Downtown !s min;mal. Recently the City provided landscape and streetscape Improvements to Main Street, !n order to de-emphasized Its use for vehicular traffic by snaking it a one-way street.;to encourage pedestrian traffic. Mille these Improvements have helped stimulate interest along Main Street, major work Is still needed to create an.atmosphere that link, Main Street to the pier and other Downtown areas. A comprehensive landscape and 7 r%bltect=I framework will help accomplish' this and visually unify : Plan area. This framework should be based on fc zal points, n fy the 5pe ►_ Districts and entry nodes (see Figure 3.4). The landscaping`envis=oned could create a dramatic change; in the Downtown 5pecinc. Plan atmosphere, is would be ideal to snake all Improve'm ents`at the same time as part of an Initial thrust. This can be. accompl:shed 'if the City invests the stoney to fund landscaping trp front, the `costs of„improvements could then be passed on to property o%n- ers through as assessment Disti lct, or reimbursed by tax increment financing. Ongoing . maintenance; of landscaping must also be , provided., if 'the Improvements are Installed by the City prior;to dpvelorment taking place, the City will have to maintain them. This could place rt burden on the already hard-pressed maintenance budget. An alteimative would be to form maintenance assessment Districts so that pruDerties benefitted by the Improvements wouM pay for tbel: upkeep. :Lamb-cape maintenance by the City also InsLwes that services will be. of uniform quality and performed regularly. .-37_ (00621)y r ,.,,,u Additional Information is needed, on which to base recommendations for installing a6d maintaining landscape improvements. These will be developed with the Design Guidelines Document. A. P(daoardwalk. 'This area, located at , the pier and Pacific Coast Highway, should emphasize the ocean view-oriented experience. This area should Include fast food sands and novelty shops, eating areas, umbrellas and overhead porticos are recommended. a festive maples, color scheme, and "pier boardwalk" sigrwge will create atmosphere and further complete the transition from this area to the Main Street plaza. Lighting will also be extremely important In promoting a day and night activity area. Other possible :uses in this area are a museum and new dining establishments In a multi-level area, and the necessary parking to support then: functions. Pedestrian movement, strolling, window shopping and eating should be the primary focus of this area. B. hfatr ire za -- The Main Street plaza should be a focal point inland from Pacific Coast Highway. Strong landscape elements such as color and texture should be Incorporated into this area. Examples or ties would be large paving areas with bollards, raised planters, eye--catching graphics, and banners. The outckjor aspects emphasised to include street furnishings, dining areas, kiosks, and seating areas. The possible development of a theme structure may also be appropriate, A water feature could also provide a strong link to the ocean. Pedestrian activity Is critical to this area. The area should develop as the destination node on Pacific Coast Highway. C. Town SuarclS�jxr Bock The Town Square Is envisioned as a gatherinE spot; a resting oalsis with neighborhood shopping plaza containing terraced walks, retail stores, and patio dining. It will serve as the terminus of new development and mark the beginning of the transition to the established neighborhoods. Deacuse of Its relationship to the Main Street redestrian area, this plaza should incorporate kiosks, street furniture, transit shelters and possibly a water reature to emphasize the human scale. Landscaping in this area should consist of grove and specimen vegetation. Equally Important to landscaping and .architecture within the actual Districts is the treatment of entryways and transitional areas between the Downtown Districts and existing neighborhoods. The main entry ways are seen .as the "front doors" to the community. They must provide entry experience and physical definition. They will also define the edge of the City in relationship to adjacent beach communitites. Possible elements which could be incorporated Into these .are the Huntington Beach logo. District graphics, and vertical pylons with up-lighting. Landscaping should Include the "theme" palms to' establish a concept' which will be carried out through the corridors and Districts. Other important landscape areas are nodes at crosswalks and main entry portals to the Plan are2. The following discussions highlight some recommedend Improvements. -38- tC10b2�f) : ,-..i..........:..rw..r.ww.....s.rw.r..rn...va..._.....:._._.»r.w.w+.w.«..wsr.�.r.M:lt�_.cX.'/l.'wl ".t:+,._.•if 1. 'i%..:%�� r� f Paclf c co8st' Ht Str ' Cnrrlda .. i g�Y" tSs�P .� P'acifl:c t High ay'ts the :major traffic � carrier -throw the,.,,. Downtown specific. Plan :,area. therefore'si 1ficant landscape,_improve ents are recommended."Through use-of tall vertical palms and"lower-`growing trees, the hlghway ;could ' becom e a more distinctive boulevard in the.:European style. ,Enriched , : S pock pavan benches, kiosks and saa,�onal color ets in raised planters will ` t.: -atribute to.',the •overall . amblence grid grace,aiid establish pleasant tp lestrian zones and transit stops.; Extensive use should be made of palm. frees and landscaped medlan. Tree,: spacing will also bed of concern, spacing should be approximately 30'-40' on center. ' Buffering the parking areas along the highway should also be attempted, possibly with a terraced garden walkway to the parking levels. p rkway 'Treatrn!Cnl - Parkway treatment will help create the City Image.. The proposed Walnut Avenue extension and other arterials in the Downtown area should combine an Intensity of native plants with the "theme" palms in the landscaped areas. There streets should provide ample setbacks for the type of landscaping that promotes color and variety. and helps to soften adjacent developments. - - Special entry edge treatment will provide a Residential E�iRe Entry pe ry g visual transition from existing single family homes to higher density housing. This will help establish new an identity and familiarity to streets and accomplished through use of structural'portals wi Districts. This can be accom th vines. Lighting can be used In 'conjunction with these to create night-time sculptural qualities. Enriched pavement will help to ptomote pedestrian flow and slow vehicular appro ich In these areas, which will enhance the pedestrian experience in the area. -r_osC-walk Nades Cross-walk nodes are collector/meeting polnts. for pedestrian traffic from the beach into neighborhoods or the village center. Primary elements at these points are the street name. signs, traffic signal and crosswalk indicator. These can be incorporated into an ! overhead signage area. Trees can be planted In these areas to create a visual axis from the ocean to inland streets. Arts Paik, - The establishment of an area devoted to works of art which center on the ocean-oriented theme. Ideally a cultural activity node with ample green space and a gardenr4 ue ambience could be developed. However, spreading the arts theme throughout the Downtown area by providing piece of sculpture in various public spaces may work equally as I well. -39- (0062D) 3.5 Puhlic-l+aclli t ies In addition to the public facilities and utilities generally provided by a local jurisdiction, other civic amenities .would be desirable to further -.nhance the Specific Plan area. These amenities may be provided by the City, other public'agencies, or by private parties and could include a wide assortment of specialized uses ranging from parks to at library, post office, theater or museum. Because the interest In or desire for such amenities In an urban setting varies greatly, their incorporation Into the Specific Plan is only - suggested. The actual facilities would be built If and when government and/or private groups determined that their establishment withl'a a proposed development would be beneficial. The .Specific Plan area is in a prime location for public facilities. ;The area includes two important parks: Huntington City Beach and Bolsa Chica State Beach. Both of these parks not only provide extraordinary recreation and aesthetic amenitles to local residents, but also attract large numbers of visitors from outside the City. This latter quality makes these facilities crucial to the viability of future development such as hotels and visitor-oriented commercial. Huntington Beach Municipal Beach (the City beach) Is the 'most popular beach in Orange County and Is often sited as an example of outstanding landscaping and design, The City beach also includes the pler. which Ls one of the most significant features In the plan area. ftlsa Chica State Beach, (in the area of the Downtown Specific Plan), has been the site. of oil production facilities for many decades. 'As a'result`'of this, :the bluff area and beach has historically been underutilized and unattractive. The City, with the cooperation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation,- and the oil companies, has completed a landscape plan for the entire bluff area. This area will be developed to include a bike trail, new accessways from the bluff to the sand, and a phased landscaping plan. In addition to the State and City beaches other civic amenities In the Downtown area are the public library at Main Street and Orange Avenue, and the United States post office at Main Street and Olive Avenue. Additional public facilities 'may be envisioned and may he appropriate for Inclusion in the Downtown Specific Plan. Many of the amenities suggested can tw unilaterially instigated by the City, such as a library or park. Others will require the cooperation of other agencies or groups, whose participeition - 4D- (0462D) may range from,minor involvemtint, to' complete. provision. The means for encouraging or.:promoting these,dies, would involve at leastl;the following: 1). an .assessment of the , likelihood that a partic%lar , facility could ,be attracted 'to the Clty; 2) a reasiblilty study.on whether' or not the use. could be self-supporting' or the amount or. suWIdy ` It would. require; ,3). a cost benefit analysis of the,'various Aternatlye amenities which cfluld:be attracted and supported in order to choose among these or determine which . should be pursued; and a) an investigation offunding sources.The following provide brief discussions of possible public facilities: Library and Post Office - The existing library and post office are both appropriate facilities In a Downtown area. Both provide a necessary service to both businesses and residents, however it is possible that these facilities could be moved to other locations in the Downtown area. One possible location would be in the District 6. -- - A museum might be the type of amenity which would augment the visitor-serving atmosphere of the Main Street-Pier axis. This type of facility could be either publicly or privately financed. The area provides an appropriate setting for, several ocean-related museum thernes such as oceangraphy, archaeology, natural history, local history, the oil industry operations and surfing. The historic aspect of the oil-producing facilities In the region as It relates to the ocean's edge - an oil-rich environment could be part of the museum theme. As a point ,of interest to visitors, the oil industry could be recognized through strategic location of oil-producing machinery, such as a large rocker arm pump, treated as environmental sculpture and public art. An oil industry museu►n could be a draw, but In Itself a relatively,, lesser one. A museum could be best located in the pier area District to which could .erve as an anchor point for the Main Street-Pier axis. Ocean L tg InterDrellyc C,enteyr_ - An attraction of this type would be aimed at the regional visitor who may have already seen hiarine!and or Sea World. This would be a unique attraction ernph:,sizing human exploration. use and relationship to the ocean, and the effect upon Its ecology. Wdrking models, full-scale submersible exploration equipment, and ' other interpretive exhibits on the ocean and man could be presented. The off shore oil rigs are a natural tie-in to;w!;at the oil j companies are doing to mitigate Impacts for example, This J attraction should be closely related to the pier head, the beach and the ocean to maximize the relationship. This can be a landmark structure with a unique architectural form. Aau;1d= - An amenity similar In nature to a museunt and also appropriate for a beach area would be an aquarium. Like a museum, an aquarium could be either publicly or privately financed. The most likely location for an aquarium would be on or adjacent to the pier. Such a facility could be combined with a research laboratory. A variant of the typical aquarium is an underwater observatory, accessed from the pier, where visitors can look out and observe 41- (0062D) 7 i. J marine life in thelr na'ti Ural habitats, To be interesting, however, such an observatory should be located In a rocky area or adjacent to a manmade or natural reef which attracts fish and other marine organisms. marineresearch laboratory:woulds t a�be a valuable assendcouid combinedbe h. n aquarium. Establishing.a research facility would require soliciting the,interc. i 'of edisrtional or'research institutions. Such a venture probably entails significant ground work and would need strong City commitment to implement. However. the interest and prestige generated by a marine research lab could add significantly to the revitalization efforts of the Downtown. — � ih 'k all o Fame This idea Is related to Huntington. Beach's reputation as a top surfing spot and the site of the national surfing championships. This theme plays up the surfing presence as a posititve element and provides customers for beach level retail outlets. A surfing Hall of Fame or other point of interest could be Incorporated into new development at the pier in convection with the restaurants and viewing points for watching the surfing action and competition. Ibeeater a quditoriutn - A community theater or auditorium could be built by the City or a private developer, or by a,joint venture of public and private groups. A theater could be located In the area Immediately across from the pier area as part of a large consolidated project. A theater or auditorium would be a ,cultural asset to the City and act as a focal point or showcase for many'civic purposes such as meetings, lectures, professional or communtty theater, or musical groups. A mall or plaza around a theater might also function as an urban open space, aethetically enriching the Downtown. S==Ign Center — The largest public amenity which could be provided In the Downtown area would be a convention center. A convention center would probably be a City project and -could. be located on City property. These are theonly locations with enough space for parking and the related facilities to support a convention center. If a convention center were to be built, hotel and motel accommodations, with their attendant restaurants and shops, would be needed to house and serve conventioneers. — Yiel — The pier, located at the end of Main Street,.`Provides the focal point for Downtown Huntington Beach. Originolly'construt;ted In 1914, portions of the pier are currently in need of major repair. The Specific Plan envisions restoration of the pier in conjuction with expanded visitor serving and recreational uses. With these Improvements complete, the pier would become the hub of a major tourist recreational area and the catalyst for commercial revitalization Downtown. -42— (0062D) ell- 3.6 1rastrvctg 3.6. 1 Sewerage System The provision or adequate sewerage facilities in the Specific Plan area is an Important prerequisite to development. A sewerage system in an urban area like •Huntington Beach is composed of shared, public pipelines and related facilities which: collect and transport water-borne wastes away from Individual homes and other establishments, treat this waste, and dispose of It In a manner that is not detrimental to the public health or to the environment. Collection and treatment of sewage in Huntlon Beaci Is accomplished cco i plished by a combination -of 'City and,;County facilitiesp pes, pump stations `and a treatment plant. $mall sewer pipes collect wastewater from Individual buildings and oil . facilities. ;: The sewage Is ; then '.'transported through a series of consecutively larger pipelines to a treatment plant where it is treated and discharged into the ocean. The larger pipelines into which sewage from the many smaller severs flows, are called "trunk sewers" or "trunk lines." An adopted sewerage plan for the Orange County Sanitation District No. . 1 t proposes ses extending a large collector or trunk sewer. the Coast ,Trunk sewer within the Specific Plan area from Lake to Goldenwest Street. The-, extension of the Coast Trunk sewer to Goldenwest Street' will ailevly to j problems which exist In portions of the older Ocean Avenue Trunk sewer. The new trunk line Is located beneath walnut Avenue through the Dow•n.town, g systera in the Spe'cinc Plan area 'ls ` The remainder of the sewerage composed of two other County system trunk sewers which are located beneath Cake Street and At?anta Avenue and numerocss City sewers, which Ere smaller than these trunk lines and which are burred In the alieys thsbughout th e Specific Plan area. in 1979, the City retained the engineering firm of Lowry and Associates' to Identify those sections within the sewerage system which would. . be potentially overloaded at ultimate development of the,.Ceneral Plan. The capacity of the sewers In the Downtown and Townlot areas were not identified as deficient in This study.' Another analysis, of the sewerr in thy, Downtown was made by the City In the spring of 1980 through the use of a specially equipped camera which photographs the Insides of sewer pipes. No major obstructions or Immediate problems were identified by this method. *The General Plan has been amended since this study was conducted. which resulted in a reduction In the amount of area designated fixed Development Commerical. -43- (OO6213) -1 Nonetheless, thetie %faclli+ i ties are , approximately '70 years old. The 'City': Department of Public Works: has,indicated 'that, because of their age, there tlons of lines ma need t €ng. these ,lines to tie new ,Coast 'Crank, and ma be problems;with. connect po y o'be'reconstructed'at the tirne;of connection. Croft tlesnin teachDQlstrict�and �� Indi�rldually through taxation or the p pe ugh sewer connection fees for new District No. =1 l to complete all tly a lack of funds in County.`Sanitation development. There P currenthe projects shown on the District's blaster Plan; therefore. an annual priority for projects must be established. The inabli;ty,of'District No. 11 to make all the necessary improvements could cause problems In local sewers and may constrain development In certain areas of the ` City unless other funding sources are ,, Identified. County Sanitation District No. t I Is studying the need to establish Increased fees In order to fund the needed Improvements. No additional major improvements, after the Coast Trunk Is completed, are forecast by District No. 11 as necessary In the near term for the Downtown area. The sewer connection fee Is the primary source of funding for proposed City sewerage projects. The Public Worm Department, as rd condition to approving an application for sewer cotunectirns, is authorized to collect a fee for the purpose of reimbursing-the City for the cost of upgrading the sewer system and of future replacements and extensions to this system. This fee Is placed into the City's sewer fund. The City's sewer fund balance Is expected to be adequate to Lend the majority of Improvements needed to correct existing and potential capacity deficiencles and to provide adequate service to new development at ultimate buildout. Replacement of sewers in the Downtowin was not Included in .this., estimate . However, If replacement becomes necessa ry because of difficulties in connecting the older Ines to the new trunk sewer. the City's Department of Public Works estimates that this could cost approximately $4 million for the entire Townlot/Downtown area. 3.6.2 Drainage The purpose of the City's drainage system is to convey water away from property and streets. The,existing drainage system is Incorporated Into the City's overall flood control system which Is designed to prevent flooding during heavy storms. Rainfall cunstitutes the most Important source `of water runoff; however, activities such as watering lawns and washing cars also generate waste water which must be removed and disposed of. The existing drainage system in the Specific Plan area is a srnalI portion of a much larger network which Includes regional flcx3d control channels maintained by the County and tributary drainage facilities which are the responsibility of the City. Generally speaking, local storm drains and channels now Into County channels; however, in the Speclflc Plan area, drain pipes pass underneath PCH and empty directly onto the t-each. No County flood control channels are located within the Specifle Plan area. —44— (0062D) ; In 1979, L.D. King"and"Associates preparet'a�h4aster Plan of Drainage for the,=City. . ;The .Plan identifle'd serious deficiencies in the Downtown and Townlot areas which',Include portions, ou,, four_ or the City's 34 :dfxinage Districts.. These deficiencies are not primarily in the Specific Plan area, but rene' 6t'a more widespread problem in the`Townlot area. Implem6fitation of these improvements would alleviate existing drainage problems in the Townlot area. The recommended improvements by District are outllned below: - Drainage Dlstrkt 8H Extend,the existing drains In Goldenwest (42 inches in diameter), Sixteenth(? inches) and Twentieth (42 inches) Streets to Orange Avenue. Construct a new drain in Eighteenth Street between Orange and PCH. - District 8D - Construct a drain in Thirteenth Street from Orange to the ocean (96 Inches). (completed) -- District 8A -- Construct a drain on Sixth Street (42 inches). -- District 89 -- No improvements are recommended. Drainage projects are funded. primarily through drainage fees, _ The .City collects drainage fees, from 'property owners prior to issuing a building permit or recording a subdivision map in any drainageDistrict and deposits this fee into a "planned local drainage fund";for the purpose 04defraying the costs of constructing master-planned facilities in that District. It is Important that the drainage fees accurately reflect current drainage needs and costs. Each of the City's 34, drainage Districts represent local runoff, areas with different drainage characteristics and needs. The amount of the drainage fee is based on the estimated costs of master-planned facilities and varies for each drainage District. According to the State law (Crovemment Code Section 66483), fees collected from development activities in any one District can ,only be used to construct facilities in that District. In some instances, other sourct:s I besides fees, such as Housing I and, Conimunity Development 'grant funds or tax-increment from .a redevelopment.project, could be available for drainage improvements. The cost 'of all lrcprovesnents In Districts 8H, $D and 8A was estimated at $5.7 million in`,1979,`and these would be constructed with District drainage fees and other . sources -1ij accordance with a priority ' established by the City's . Master Plan of Drainage. These Districts include significant areas outside the` Downtown, and the current cost of improvements solely for, the Specific Plan area has not been computed because it is unlikely that they would be const'ruc:ted separately; each drain in its entirety would be built as a solution to problemis of the larger drainage network. 3.6.11 Water An adequate water supply is necessary to serve new development within the Specific Plan area. , The water system must serve the demands of residents, commercial establishments, recreational and landscape uses and fire fighting activities, as necessary, i -45- (0062D) The'Gity owiu the present .watu, syst and opeirates It through',tltie Wa . . � .•�. ent C. . 8 - cer Division Hof the�P,ublic.VYyrka De"'ar Council and set at a level �f titer p ry to at a ratea roved b the City pe... pe P P � tu;ough the passage'of bonds,",he Citg.hax .nmde ru jor im.ro ementsItotthe� ' teen:enablinj It to Most notably,' the�,Cit 'hel accommodate anticipated furturt growth. � � y� ped construct pipellnes to bring w;mer from the 'Metropolitan Water District (h(WD) reservoirs Into the City, thereby erlitreing the potential supply for future development. In the Specific Plan , area, the existing system consists of slater mains (12-inches In diameter) which are located In the following ;streets: Goldenwest, Seventeenth, Main, Lake, Beach, Atlanta, Palm, and' Orange. These mains carry the water from reservoirs to the Downtown and Townlot, where distribution lines branch off to supply water to Individual user t. In the Downtown and Townlot areas, these branch lines are currently located beneath the alleys. Generally speaking, the large water mains located ftoughout, the .City are adequate; however, In the Downtown area the pipes are old, undersized and in a deteriorating condition. Many of the mains will have to be upgraded'or replaced to meet the demands of future development. The, Public Works Department has compiled a list of water projects for Implementation over a five-yp.ar period. Included to this list: ;As the replacement of old cast fron pipes in the Downtown. Ultimate Implementation of these projects Is based on a number of considerations. Among them,>.high priority is given to projects that provide new ,water supply (i.e., wells) or improve fire flow deficiencies, and lower priority is given to Improvements suc:-, as those Downtown, which may be needed only at ultimate build-out. Improvements to the City's water system are primarily ,funded out,,.,,or revenues generated by the sale of water to City resldents. A smaller amount of money is also collected from water connection fees charged, to new development based on acreage and/or nlirn'rer of units. These revenues are expected to be adequate to cover the nr:ds for Downtown Improv-!ments. _ I i i -46- ( f2D) III . ,I 4.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4.0.01 Intent and Purpose The purpose of this document Is to provide for orderly ,development 'and improvement wlthin the Downtown Specific Plan. The plan is established to guide the development of the area which is characterized by ,its' unique location, - geographic features. land uses and ownership patter:u,,and should not be regulated by zoning district standards applicable throughout_the.'rlty. This specific plan will replace the existing inning with pollries developrnent standards and descriptive mans specifically designed for ''the downtown area. The specific plan, provides for creativity at the Andlvidual,�prOject level, and at t::e same time ensures that developments will ultimately combine to create a cohesive community. Only parageaph 4.0 et seq., "Development Standards", shall be certified as Bart of the Local Coastal Program. 4.0.02 Downtown, Specific Plan IIdundary The property described herein Is included in the Downtown Specific Plan and shall, be subject to policies and development standards set forth In' th)s article. Precisely, the Downtown Specific Plait Includes the real prd pert y described as follnws: —47— (00311 D1 Beginniiir, at the most. northerly corner of Lot 22, Block 122 of the Huntington Beach Seventeenth Street Section Tract, as recorded in Book 4, page, 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, State of California; 'thence northerly 50 feet approximately to a :'point, said point being; the intersection of thz ce►iterlines `of Goldenwest Street and Walnut Avenue; said point .also befog the true point; of beginning; ; thence southwesterly along: the centerline of Golde'nwest Street and its prolongation tci a point on the,high tide Nne of the Pacific Ocean; thence southeasterly along said high tide ling: to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet northwesterly,, measured at right' angles. frorn' the southwesterly along said high tide line .to a line parallel 'with and 72.50 feet northwesterly, measured at right angles, from the southwesterly prolongation of the centerline of Main Street; thence southwesterly along said tine 1,470 feet approximately. to a line ;parallel with heretofoi a jaid high tide line; thence southeasterly along said line,. 145 feet a pproxicnately to a line parallel with and 72.50 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles, from said: sout.hwesteriy ,prolongation of the centerline of Ntain Street; thence northeasterly along said line to the heretofore said high tide line to the prolongated survey centerline; of Beach Boulevard; thence northeriy along said s%!rvey,eenterline of Beach Boulevard 2800 feet approximately to the south line of Tract 9580, as shown on a map recorded in Book 444. page .11. records of Orange Colony, State of California; thence westerly atone said 'sine 1995 .feet approximately to the centerline: of Huntington Street; thence northerly along said centerline 1320 feet approximately to the centerline of Atlanta Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 857 feet approximately to the centerline of Lace Street; thence rortherlj- along said centerline 2352 feet approximately to the centerline of Palm Avenue; thence westerly along said centerline 332 feet approximately to the centerline of Sixth Street; thence southwesterly to the centerline of Walnut Avenue; thence northwesterly along said centerline 5547 feet approximately to the true point of beginning. 4.0.03 Organization This section details the Cevelopment standards for projects' In the Specific Plan area. The section Includes 1) regulations piffecting administrations and permitting, 2) general requirements "or all projects of a cerialn size or type, 3) particular requirements for projects within the different Districts and 4) overlays which permit special uses in select areas. 4.0.04 Definitions The following definitions shall apply to the Downtown Specific Plan. Terms not 'described under this section shall be subject to the defialtioais contained j in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. l B-alsi ChIca Sttaic-Reach: The area seaward of Pacific Coast Highway extending from the Huntington Beach City Pier northwest to Warner Avenue. The portion of this beach from the pier to Goldenwest Street is within, the boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan. B1j1h -tg=]JRC: A dimension which specifies where the structure must begin. For example. "build-to--5'". where the structure must extend to five fret of the lot line. I -48- (008413) Pn sna tiny oars 'of a lot •arrel unotatrucled from khe .._LISZW. �i�'.cl-ins archltectuEal : feaxure,s ex�,ndin no i114[.�%I= thirty l- 0l'�hn-Crsuahr. strurmirc and.enjuding-any arca of the s Le di vocd,,t- ; riveways And-other 2a sittS.areas. .[ SDr The Dirl.ctor of the Department of CmmulCJIX Development Ear dvi: The mair, face of Front of a building. ftAS1t : Capainle of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable per'.od of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors. Eloar E9rea Ra'ilo(FAR): A number which indicates how many square feet of structtue crin be built on a site, expressed as a multiple of the gross building site area. For example. If a site is 5,000 square feet in area arni the FAR is � 2.0, the v4uare footage of a building cannot exceed 10,000 gross square feet (2 X 5,000). Erojiikw Any lot or portion of a lot which abuts an arterial shall be considered to front on that arterial and shall comply with the required front yard setbacks, whether or not th:: development on that lot actually takes acecss from the arterial. I ' fj jj_block: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets. i � Q52 NitE.acca: Me area within 112e,,,_,1 t 1 ne f ra._PaLseLQLI ad.,W= w e Ruttliss`tc .�...a1LXs• a �.fineilL4..or ath ��1LQs13� to be i�,.S13.�SF�1 � resew d fu.ls Wir, use-ban ticen ded lia'1f ok: A parcel of property bounded on all sides by public streets and/or alleys containing at least one.-half (1/2) the net area of the full block. Eje : The vertical distance above the highest adjacent street level measured to the highest point of the.roping of a flat root'or to the deck lime of a mansard roof or the average neigh, of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. HmL A_bu1lding desingd Jor s 4Q=1 s...a...if.tntmsXx...;lh1�U1 1��C Whit Ontaln guest room LInIts, bjet siie__._rC;A; Thf, Jgjiuq izgntal_ a ea Millis th e MCI QL laud adus ve Qf all dclits=:QL-WOLY-or-mcm!tnts--Yiblgh.PhYSIC911v Dts�hI.bl& the surfaC usICS,(„ that sort on of t;t ty fgr, gther than Yeb1culsar Ingress and egress. The Arca A -lacraLAQ.a dwellU,,,tltlli..wbifohlaUkra access In the fgrm uf-a otio oC. �ilY� .49 (0084 D) ,, Public own ,ce: Public open space may include cane of the following: open air commercial (open to the street on the first flour, or on at least one side, above the first floor, or open to the sky), patios. plazas, bal:onles, gardenvor view areas accessible to the public. , The open space requiremint can be met anywhere in the development; however., open space provided above."the second floor will receive only fifty (50) percent credit toward this h physically Inaccessible the I snot be met by �apen areas which are requirement. This requirement ,ca p Y Y public Rp.5 ual Darrel: A legal lot which does not; meet ►he requirements for a building site within the Dis riot in which' it is fixated, and where the abutting sites are already developed. Sight.-of-way Mv_O That portion of property wench is dedicated or over which an ea3ement is granted for public streets or alleys. � i-si�bt� ggan parking: Par3.Ing structure which is partially ,recessed E Into the development site, and which may or may not support additional structures above (e.g. dwelling units, tennis courts, or parking structures). Sesback: A stipulated area adjacent to the lot lines which roust be kept free of structures over forty-two (42) inches high. Street level: The elevation measured at the centerline of the public street adjacent to the front setback at a point midway be.ween the two side property lines. Suite Note1:.....A._bniIdIDgs6.e led foaC.SLC.+C.9JSZrd. u- temoomZ abld ng plane w Ich contain SUest rggms and Mili, soilln kitchencctel and a Separate !LvIng rs'd�.t..for Cash unU lowolol: The area and parcels bounded by PacIYIc -Coast Highway on the southwest, Goldenwest Street on the northwest. Palm Avenue on the north and northeast, and Sixth Street on the east and southeast. Wetland: means lands within the coastal none whic"i may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and Include saltwater marshes, freewater marshes, open or closed b.ackish water marshes, swamps, mucSfla is and fens. OtIMAI right=Qf„wy: The most lateral edge of the area dedicated for street or alley purposes. --Sr (0084D) I I 4.1 ADMINIST1tATION 4.1.01 Approvals Required All develo m6ts wi p thin the Downtown Specific' Plan.,shall be subject to,one or unore of the following, as Identified In each district: MA6W1FMht 41A Conditional Use Permit , A131WJPAfi4A19641W, aadLor the Design Review Board provisions of the H::ntington Beach Ordinance Code. All ah sIcal 'devei�nCnt shall.' ,reai`Ired to bic r-gylewed bv' xhe Ocsten Revie &Ad' rlar to ofcss'ins addiih2AdLculilP.ments -if reuuimd. 'The Hisisrical- Resorces*'.Boa shalL'Sjtsyldtx..A--eagnMe13 atlas (gr-Jinklual cQIdgred to be' hlqm:Jhly-Ig,nificant. hi addition, a Conditional';,Use' Permit. (MR) shall be required for any, rrstdAUW 6bdfddttUNdhi/A,fi106W CM riflye ,subdlvlslon. mixed-use development, E(�V` 1'd1St b4�'t/ /l�ll�r14 rV&V1fMH1dhYMYAWf1*WAHhW or any protect which requires a special permit (Section 4.1.02). The Design Re%iev1 DQa d O,bUdli, BdVd1W.-/!MV*. A'djdiftiMt (Wh), Planning Commission or the City Council shall also consider the following before approving a project: (a) Projects.shall be in conformance with the adopted Design Guideline, for the area. (b) Archltccturae features and general appearance of the ,prAposed development shall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of,thy area or the community as a whole. (c) Architectural 'reatures and complimentary , colors shall ,be incorporated into the design or.all exterior surfaces or the buildings in'order to create an aesthetically pleastng project. (d) Particular attention shall,be given to incorporating slgris, lnclikiing their colors, Into,the overall design of the entire development In Grder to achieve unlforml ty. (e) Vehicular accessways shall be designed with landscaping and building variation to eliminate an alley-like appearance. 4.1.02 Special Permit The Downtown Specific Plan development standards are designed to encourage developments creating an aesthetically ¢leasing appearance, enMncing the living environment, and facilitating Innovative architectural design and adaptation of the development to the 'unique surrowding enviro»rnent. -51- (0084D) i D viatl ns from the 'development regul9tions of this Specific Plan, may lie g the ,time of project approval for unique architectural siting or p q g features, including but not limited to parcel size, building height. site coverage, setbacks, open space and landscaping. A special permit may not be granted for deviations from mximum density or ark:n re uirements or.deviation for buildin hei Districts 1, 2, �4. is in P 11 or q requirements of the Conservation Overlay. Such deviat orrs '-, shall 'onlyeallo allowed when, in the 'opinion of the Planning 1 Commission, significntly greater benefits from the project can be prdvlded than would occur If all the minimum requirements , were poet. Some additional benefits which may make a project eligible for exemptions Include: greater open space, greater setbacks, unique or innovative designs, public parking.: public open space, and the use of energy conservation or solar technoloSY developer ma •. The develo r request Special Permit at the same 3 � a pe time as the filing of an apolication for a Conditional Use Permit and shall be heard concurrently. The Planning Commission may approve the Special Permit in whole or in part upon a finding that the proposed development, in addition to providing greater benefits as required above, will also: (a) Promote better living environments; (b) Provide beater land planning techniques with maximum use or aesthetically pleasing types of architecture, landscaping, site layout 1 and design; (c) Not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City In general, nor detrimental or Injurious to the valise of property or Improvements of the neighborhood or of the City In general; and (d) Be consistent with objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan In achieving a development .adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding environment. (e) Be consistent with the policies of the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan and the California Coastal Act. lII uA1 atc aml Eedc a] law.. 4.1.03 Coastal Permit Developments within the Downtown Specific Plan area will be subject toy the requirements pertaining to Coastal Development Permits (CDP). in addition to the other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4,t.04 Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto, !s for any reason held to x Invalid or unconstitutional by the decision` of any court ofcompetent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this title, or any future umendments or additions hereto. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted these titles and each 42-- C(}Os4b) t entence, subsection, sentence, clausea, phrase. or portion or any future amendments or additions thereto, .irrespective of the fact that any, one,or more sections, amendments 'a subsections, clauses, phrases, portions or any future dditlons thereto may be declared Invalid or unconstitutional. 4.1.05 Appeals . ng,matte Decisions by,the Director bfl�/ttldAI�t�lMi�/atf�� on nom4oni ;nay be'appealed to,the City Adminlstzator;''de* CIslons on' ,zoning.matters may 1;e'.appealed to the WVVbV1A'M"1Ak1,V0AYdAU, Planning Commission am City Council. f € . - f 1 i 4.2 CFyEi2.AL PRpy1SI41y,� The general provisions of this article shall apply to all developments within j the Downtown Specific Plan area wherever .the size or type of development proposed would make such provisions applicable. All ! 'development shall comply with all existing standard plaas and specl€ications and all aQpli 91-S yisi4ns o,} the Hunt) on_ Beach o dinno and-HUDi faYxlt1l/1&Ws: 4.2.01 p,ermljted____11sr,s. Permitted uses shall be established in each District and shall be required to meet all applicable provisions of the Hwttington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, the, following shall apply: (a) All structures inc'dental and accessory to a permitted principal use or structure may be erected on any parcel containing a main building provided that such structure(s) not Exceed fifteen (15) feet In height nor to be closer than ten (10) feet to any other structure on the same parcel and shall conform with all setback requirements of the District. Exception: Parking structures arc excluded from this provision. (b) Parcels which, prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had an oil suf fix (0 01) and are identified in Figure 4.14, shall retain such suffix In combination with the new zoning deslgnatlon "Downtown Specific Plan" (see Section 4,14). (c) Parcels which, prior to the effective date of this ordinance, had a htobileh6me District (MH). shall r etaln such designatlon ire combination with the: new zoning designations in the "Downtown Specific Plan" serving as an overlay, for the effected Districts (see Section 4.16). (d) All nonconforming uses or structures shall be required to meet all app=lcable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code In each of the following: • Any expansion of,,floor area greater tlVL,.ea JIG) C shall rcg.Ulgo.% j-r&nd It Iona I use„��L'IIA�II�..�h�1Lt3�..L�SifA red-t4 CMS': i't►UlJ1r{h �hdthlft '�l�E/i�t`/ISt�C�IB'1rYfdllltl3Ye fhbVMiEIMAU,6' of 11 nt Orton Bea ...(Lt�I ....iSt (008413) s.ir.r�.r:..;.G'a(. ,. ;,rirt;.,. ;Kern ;<.\L.""., d1 ' .� •Wt.e?••:.., - .c, a -- -�. -- a... r...V..s{ i+r':i✓nsl tl.•;Y.i.. sC..,":..•�.1Svrr r.Yri,V.9>r:i...3•!i-et th.a',. •yT.,.,-..... _. ... . _. w.- ... . ..,t. -L - EKceotion: r'Any Lbillldinhat r_eblllta't� or facade lllt4Y.�CU,:I1L�!l11I es t ex a d�.LII1101-ne�crnt exva rucion g[-t the rxi tng' Ljggr area• ease tbt hellhit or resulS in:an' lUreilse In rermlttcd den1l_1Y. The 12csign Review ]ag1[d.hall .revieW..... and a Y any n.[Q&oCd uxterioc j moth Any change or uses expansion of,use, or charge In occupant .to a use which would require additional of: street parking shall provide the required "off street parking according to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 4.2.02 U imum Parcel Size. A minimum parcel size shall be established In each District. A waiver of this requirement may be granted by the Director for residual parcels. In addition, the following minimum floor areas shall apply to all residential dwelling units: Minimum Floor jnit.I= rc (S,1 Ft.) Bachelor and single 4S0 One (1) bedroom 6S0 Two (2) bedrooms 900 Three (3) bedrooms 1100 Four (4) bedrooms 1300 4.2.03 1�SaximunL Den ,1Xp�( The maximum allowable density and/or Intensity (Floor area Ratio) shall be established in each District. 4.2.04 PiaxjM-uM-Buildiiigjicigb&. The Maximum allowable building height shall be established in each District. In addition. the following shall apply: (a) An additional ten (1'0)' feet In height will be allowed far reef lira: treatment, architectural features such as chimneys, solar energy equipment and mechanical devices. In no case may the air, space granted for these purposes above the maximum height limit be used as a habitable room. (b) An additional fourteen (14) feet in height may be allowed .for elevator equlpment. All mechanical devices, except for solar panels, shall be set back and screened so that they cannot be seen from public right-of wavQ. 4.2.05 MaXYRimsc Coverage. The maximum allowable site coverage shall be established In esch District. Any part of the site covered by " a roof,- Including covered walkways, patios and carports, shall tm Included in -overage. ..SS (0084D) Exception: Subterranean or semi-subterranean parking less than forty-two (42) Inches In height above the adjacent grade shall be subject to the provisions of Section 4.2.12(c). 4.2.06 S6%ba_ L`(Frodt Yard). The minimum' front yard setback shall be established In each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (a) No structure or portion of any structure shall project Into or over the public RONy. (b) The minimum front yard 'setback for parking lots and j1Lt *kJng structures ab v�grijde shall be ten (10) feet. (c) The minimum front Yard setback - for �i.1�tw�aTlt:aa and semisubierrang a,parkipg hall be subject tQ'the approvai s f OA_ 121rec�tor-and the 12cum nsnt of Publk Aorksa lhc dtoth- I the franc yard set k shall bt a mlaimum of fjvc (5) feet. 4.2.07 setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard setback shall be established in each District. In addition, the following shall apply: (47 The minimum side yard setback for parking lots and all narking structures shall be ten (10) feet. 4.2.08 aback ($g;: Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be established In each District. 4.2.09 Setba�k (Upper Scory). An upper story setback shall he established in gagh MY Dlstrict�t//�!►ifi4/Ml�i'e�.�l'f/�ttt��if�!/d/�itc:o4l�i/h�fi4�ty/i�IN/(�3'S)'/�fbi/f/ln 4.2.10 Building 5eoarat=on. CSr No bullding shall be closer than ten no) feet to any other detached building on the same site. 4.2.10u 0 .:S A minimum public open space provision will be established in each Distrlct«i6flik .bj WyMf/afrd&IbVNsftfiAUAI/ . In addition, 'the following open space requirements shall apply to all residential developments, (a) Sommo.n Open Space: All multi-family residential development s shalt provide a minimum common open space equal to twenty-T ve (25) percent of the floor area of each t nit with ' g r minimitrn dimcasion .Qf twenty (20) feel. Common open space shall be designed so that it enhances the appearance of the project 'to passers-by. In multiple unit subdivision dEvelo�ments,; romrnon areas shall be guaranteed by a restrictive covenant des&.bing the common space and its maintenance and Improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the development. . :The developer shall i' le, with the Department M Community Development SbWWd9 for 'recordation with the final subdivision snap, legal documents which will provide for restricting the use of common spaces for the designated purpose, as approved on 'the final development plan. All lands to be conveyed to the homeowner's association shall be subject to the right of the grantee �ar grantees to enforce maintenance and Improvements of the common space. w56-- (O094 D). ' r'o) � i Spau: All multi-family residential " developments v provide, the following all ground floor units slsall be provided with a patio area asset forth below. Minimum Area biro. Dim. Unit TvA LCMI-Ew 11111 Bachelor, single or one (1) bedroom 200 10 Two (2) bedrooms 250 10 Three (3)'bedrooms 300 10 Four'(4) bedrooms 400 10 Units constructed above ground level shall be provided with balconies or sun decks as follows: M!nlmum Area Nan. aim. w ' ype (Sal Ft.) ff1.1 Bachelor, single or one 60 6 (1) bedroom Two (2), three (3), or 120 6 four (4) bedrooms Note: Private ppen space , shall be contiguous to the unit and for-the exclusive use of the occupants. Private open space shall not be accesslble to any dwelling unit except the unit it serves. Private open space shall ,be physically separated from common areas by a wall or hedge at least forty-two (42) inches in height. The private npen space requiremeriv 'ay,be satisfied in whole or it part by areas used for outdoor activities which need not be open to the sky but must be open on at least one (1) sir- . 4.2.]A U muW-blQck,._cgnlsolidations. Where consolidations span two (2) or, more Districts, the requirements of each District shall apply to that portion"of the development. Divisions between Districts shall be. the center line of the vacated street. In addition, the following shall, apply: (a) Visitor-serving commercial uses must W provided within that portion of the development designated. as a visitor-serving District. (b) Commercial uses must be provided on the $round floor along Main Street. 4.2.1211 Eilrking. All developments will be required to meet the minimum-off-street parking standards of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cole. In addition. to the parking provisions in the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cone, the following shall apply: (a) Parking for must -family residential developments shall be provided at the following ratio: • Dwelling units not axceeding'one (1) bedroom shall be provided with one And one-half (1 112) on-site parking spaces one of which shall be covered and (enclosed. -S7- (0084D) • hweUing units "with two (2) : or morf; bedrooms shall be provided with .two (2) on-site parking spaces one of which shall be covered and enclosed. • Guest parking shall he provided at a ratio of one half (1/2) i space for each unit. Such parking may be unenclosed'and uncovered. • All required parking ,6xcept guest parking shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of the dwelling unit it Ill designed to ser*,e. Pa`Wng l a me dal`develoomeats Sh I be rcauired 'tQ provide'fiftY 1591 nircenl of %otal cQmired..Rlrkingsoages on=sltg nd the bala,i•,g Withill.sa rOaa5Qnab a walk g�d[Atanc flyg, hundrad (50.0) feet,_HoLfl sbaJJRCQyh1e_91 Jwnat UDl cent t? rkin$ on-silt., (WW All r quired uncovered parking �,%Teces or areas within a pment shall be screened , on a horizontal plane, Said screening shall be at least five (5) feet high as measured fr•, 'm the adjacent parking surface. Screening shall consist of landscaping or landscaping combined with opaque materials, arx! muit be approved by the Director. (CM Subterranean or semi-subterraneart .parking 51nW M above the higbesl adjacent Ct�eet iev VWVAOVHfdifl'"WVUUW/tWn j �poi"ldill/ialis'ddp�slldtbathSf�/,Eb shall be considered site ~overage at the following rate for that portion: kmbes above ft at gad : She-CuvrraPe 0" - Is" 0% 18"+ - 24" 15% 24"+ - 36" 20% 3609+ - 42" 2s% 42" and abnve (d?W Parking within the setbacks shall be prohibited except for (setbacks along PCH ,in Districts• 1 and 2 and along crake Street in District 6. individual residential driveways will also be exempt. (d � Parking requirements for nonconfar:ning uses or !ctmcrures may be met by, payment of an "in-lieu" fee for providing parking in a parking facility. Said `te may-be paid In two installments. Tat' first y installment In an amount established by City Council ltesolutio�n for each parklna space shall be paid prior to the Issuance of,butldtztg permits ur of a certificate of occupancy, whichever Wine% first. The second irsl;a11ment. In an amount ezatablished by City, Council Al, Resolution for each parking space shall be paid nt the titan city and/or a parking authority or District constructs.n parkbig structure In the Downtown area. A surety in a sum equal to thr second Installment shall be filed with the City at the time ';hip first Installment is paid. (i W If any existing oceanside cr onstreet parking is removed. it shall be replaced on a one for one basis in an area that would not result In the loss of any sandy beach area and within walking distance of the existing site. Replacement parking shall Le assured prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit. (cr)' 1,Y �IdE1r�,S6h►',Udl't�l�}S.'�ti/bf//�!`�t�tfrEd/.1,f/fdi' ' I .6�1/b�J'/!l'1�1��ti (ICJ/lib'!'��/�6f�1�,4,b1��dn+/�tdddl 1'�!�t6ffil/llh�/tts�td�ld�Mt !d�/�tlfd�ttt,4hEi://l'd//loci/�(jtR'y/f�/il'/,tit./�t�1�//[t/�b�4fh�iLl/�tt���'►'fug (cfj �Y�r4�,4�sC�ti��#.I�X/�EtL�lt'�lE�/1,��1'�/tS�/.�dt,ldbK/�/fd3'dX�fidl�/��tb��flt/bf t t�N/�t/1.7ylt��t//t tdhl//�rblrtf�/i�!/�f66►t1�1�11//�f�Ef!/�'.,�f��//1ht,�,COlIT,t�� f {fr rf/d>L // .bSl/�'beJl tbtf►1,Cbtf///af/.�PrV�/115y/fb{/t�l i f//t I1G'I,dtf#eUA d t f lzbrti�i�Jlit�Jhbl►hYt'd t1'd rAidbb+./t�ftill'dGb;/�l (dam Wherever a street, alley or private driveway :ntersect,j with a public or private right-of--way, there shall be a triangular area clear of visual obstructions from a height of forty-two (42) inches to seven (i) feet. Such triangular area shall have sides which extend a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from the MW Wub of iLdr& ; along all public streets and ten (10) feet along alleys or private driveways. 4.2.18L ,Land scaRing. in addition to City standard landscape plans and specifications, the following shall apply: (a) All setback areas fronting on nr visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open sFsee areas shall be. landscaped and permanently MJlntalned In an attractive manner and 'I shall-bc consist n wt:lilhe ado4ted �esitn._S�1tlsielltx . (b) Permanent automatic ,clectric irrigation facilities shall be provided in all landscaped areas. (c) On-site trees shall be provided in all developments as follows: one (1) thirty (3fi 0) inch box tree for each residential unit or for each 1,500 square feet of net commercial or office space. Mternatively, the following egt,ivalent of thirtyc515 (3b 0) Inch box trees may be provided: Seventy-five (75) percent o'; the total requirement shall be thirty; (36 0) (M) inch box trees and the remaining twenty-five (25) percent of such requirement may be provided at a ratio or one (1)` inch for one _(1) inch through the use of :iAMfSLsl/M/,t!/ twenty-four (24) inch box trees. Additional trees and shrubs shall also be planted to -pzovh!e a well-balanced landscape environment. Exception: Structtwes fronting on Slain Street, Fifth Street and Third Street, with a 'required five: (5) foot rttback shall be Qxempt from this requirement. -59- (0084n) (d) A landscape and irrigation Flan in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines shall by subject to approval by the Director and thti. DepE ment,•.gLpublC, Works prior to the issuance of building permit.s. (e) All parking lots shall provide a decorative masonry wall or landscaped berm installed in the setback area. all landscaping shall be installed within the parking lot area, in accordance with the Huntngton Beach Ordinance Code. Parking strLY•tures must all screen street-level parking areas from the public ROW. Such screening mwt be approved by the Director. The setback area shall be landscaped in accordance with the following guidelines and a landscape pion shall be submitted to and aproved by the Director: • Planthig material shall include at a minimum one (1) fifteen (15) gallon size tree and three (3) five (5) gallon size shrubs for each seventy-five (75) square feet of landscapes area and at least one (1) shlEJy-six (U inch boz ;ree for each one hundred and fifty (150) square feet of landscaped area. • The setback area shall be planted with suitable groundcover. • The landscaped area shall be provided with an irrigation system which conforms to the standards specifi t.d for j landscaped medians by the Department of Public Forks. I • All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and attractive manner. 4.2.A-Ali 51.teet Vacation. The following conditions Mill apply to City vacation of streets and alleys for consolidation of parcels greater than one Mock in size. (a) Streets shall be vacated only after, the City has analyzed the impacts on circulation patterns and determined that the vacation will not be detrimental. (b) Ulicre streets are to be vacated, the cost of relocating all utilities shall be borne by the developer, the City Council may waive this requirement. (c) Any public parking lest by street vacations must be replaced either on or off -ite or through in lieu fees. Such parking shall be in addition to required parking for the proposed use. (d) Consolidations that require vacation of a portion of hfain Street north of Orange Avenue shall provide a public plaza space that will enhance the Main Street corridor to the pier. The type of facility and its design shall be approved by the City. (e) At the discretion of the City, all or portions of ;Main Street may be used for a pedestrian mall. (f) Any development proposing the vacation of streets intersecting PGH in 11-strict 2 L% rd rt.1 shall provide a view, corridor no' less than the width of the former street between Walnut Avenue and PCH. No structures greater than five (5) feet In height shall be allowed within such view. con1dor. A pedestrian easement ten 00) feet wide shalt he provided through the development .generally parallel to the vacated scrvet. _.50_ (0094D i 4.2.16-U Access Ways. The following standards shall apply to all vehicular access ways: (a) Development., abutting Pacific Coast Highway (P";') and Main Street shall dedicate suff"Icient additional land along the alleys parallel to these rights-of-way so that the alleys have an ultimate width of thirty (30) feet In the case of commercial or mixed use developments, or twenty/4biN//(1A4 (20) feet In the case of residential only developments. Access to development shall be permitted from these alleys. Access to development shall not be taken directly from PCH or Main Street, new automobile curb cuts on these rights-of-w ay are prohibited. Exception: Larger than full block consoUatlons in District 1 are exempt from this provision. (b) Private access ways shall have a miniinum paved width of not less than twet ty-eight (28) feet. An additional t!= (12) f.t wide travel Sane may be required in each direction of flow into the development for a distance of one hundred feet, where an access way intersects a local or arterial public street. (c) Private access ways exceeding one hundred fifty (150) feet in length but less than three hundred (300) feet In length, shall be provided with a *urn-around having a rninimum radius of thirty-one (31) -et. For those access ways exceeding d ree hundred (HO) feet but less � than six hundred (600) feet. there shall be provided a turn-around having a minimum radius of forty (40) feet or an intertying loop circulation system. For those access %ays exceeding six hundred (600) feet. there shall be provided an Intertying loop circulation system. 4.2.L612 LjIblino. For developments of more than two (2) units, the developer shall install an on-site lighting system on all vehicular access ways and along major walkwitiys. Such lighting shall be directed onto driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. Lighting shall also be Installed within all covered and enclosed parking areas. A lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Director. 4.2.1flJ& Qjlai;e Storaze Space. Where a proposed residential development goes not � Include a separate attached garage for each d weAing unit, a minimum of one hundred (100) cubic feet of outside storage space shall be provided for each such unit. 4.2.I's12 SC-Ner and %Va=Systems. Sewer and water systems shall be designed to City standards and shall be located under,teath streets. alleys or drives. , in no case shall individual sewer lines or sewer n-,alns for a dwelling unit be permitted to extend underneath any other dwelling unit. 4.2.1,9n ;.M. All signs in the development shall conform to the,provisioru or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Commercial xign9c in mix,.*d developments shall not be intrusive to residential development or other uses and shall be consistent with the adopted Design Guidelines. -61- (0084D) 3 (a) The placement of addrezz numbers shall be at a uniform location throughout the development and shall i.�e approved by the Dlrector. (b) When appropriate, the developer shall install on—site street name signs at the intersections of access ways. as approved by the City Engineer. Street name signs shall also be approved by the Director for design and type and shall be consistent with the adopted Design i Guidelines. All signs required by this section shall he installed at the approved 'ocations prior to the time the first dwelling unit Is occupied. 4.2.2D21 Rduse oileclion Arcas. In residential development, refuse collection areas shall be provided within two hundred (200) feet of the units they are to serve. In all develepments, trash arras shall be enclosed or screened with a masonry wall, and shall be situated In order to minimize nolse and vizual Intrusion on adjacent property as well as to eliminate fire hazard is adjacent structures. Residents shall be provided with collection areas that are separate and distinct from the collection area of offices and other commercial activities. 4.2.2i122 ANcular Storage. Storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles and j other similar vehicles shall be prohibited unless speclflcally designated areas for the storage of such vehicles are set aside on the final development plan and, In the case of condominium developments, provided for in the association's covenants, canditic,ns. and restrictions. Where such areas are provided, they shall be enclosed and screened from view on a horizontal plane from adjacent areas by a combination of a six (6) foot high masonry wall and permanently maintained landscaping. i 4.2.2421 Anjt= ,. All roof top antennas are prohibited. 4.2.2.8L4 UEi y Ines. All utility lines shall be undergrounded where possible. 4.21,421 s3u2 'i;UMQWI, In commericial developments of one half block sit• more, dedication shall be made for bus turnauts as recommended by O.C.T.D. Any bus turnout so recommended shall be incorporated as part of the development plan. 4.2162_6 Q, p P. County Ir2psit V1u-_-t.L.C=cr- A transit center shall be located within proximity of the dmwntown area which will provide pedestrians access to the beach and retail services. 4.2.M 7 HomeowneL-1' or Corny unity -AssQa t1Qn. All multiple unit subdivision developments shall be approved subject to submission of a legal Irs'(rument or instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recre3tional - areas, a,ui communal facilitles. No ,Such instrument shal' be acceptable until approved by the City'Aetorney as to legal form and effect. and by the Depar_trew of CQ.mrnunitx Development ShWA U as to suitability for the proposed use of the open areas. ' t 1 If t:ie common open spaces are to be conveyed to the homeowners' association, the developer shall file a declaration of covenants. to be submitted with the appl'.cation for approval. that will govern the association. The provisions shall includ4, but not be limited to, the following: (a) The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the initial sale of the last dwelling units. (b) Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. (c) The open space restrictions shall be permanent. 4.2262$ Compliance with certain requirements of the Coastal Zone (CZ) Suffix: Protects shall comply with the following sectlons of the Coastal Zone f Suffix: 8,67fl/1 "Community Facilities"; Wllff, "Diking. Dredging and Filling"; ebVIR, "Hazards"; 86TR/W. "Buffer Requirements";' 0,67R'lYY. "Energy"; and OL79113 "Signs" as Identifj d In .She. Huntinilwion -Ecaah Qrd[n=e Cgs!r.• i i —63— (0 s 4.3 DISTRICT 41: VISITOR—SERVING COMMERCIAL PuMgEe. This District is limited to three nodes fronting on Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) which are adjacent to tnedlum and hi-N density residential Districts. These nodes provide sites for cornmerci3; facilities to serve visitors to the City and State Beaches. .i The area between Goldenwest and 6th Streets will be primarily medium to 1 high density residential. Residential uses will also be p:;:rmItted in this District, as long as the necessary visitor—serving m"s are included In the development. Dgundari s. [district #1 includes three rode.-: The two blocks from Goldet:west to 21st Streets, between PCH and the midlase of the alley; the two blocks from 18th to 16th Streets, between PCH and the midline of the alley; and the block from 4th to 8th between PCH and the midllne of the alley. I -64 (0084 D) r 4.3.41 Psirmitted. .Usu. (a) I+cy, construction and, csl, biisbmeni os the kire uses In Distria 91 shg1_l tc _i2crmttted subless to St1s~ �s�BtrQ tl of Coadi tional U,5e- Eermit. Change gf use ShAl be u lgc-Ct to the approval Qf he Diteemt; fir Mii; MdMy/#MeVpArii gkillAMtI Wl"A%V1Af&"WfMVIa 6flV7;5MU& JY,U16fPWAfitl,fbtf,(MfdrkldfiWMit Y. A. Antique stores Art gallery B. Bakeries (no more than seven (7) employees) Ranks and savings and bans branch offices (no drive-up windows; not to exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet) Beach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat and marine supplies Bookstores DsutJ.Qu C. Clothing stores Coin, stamp and art dealers i Confectioners Curio shops D. Delicatessens Drug stores F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Game stores Gifts and party shops Groceries (convenience) 1. Ice cream parlors J. Jewelry stores L. Laundromats iInsurance M. Marine Meat or fish markets N. Newspaper and magazine stores Newstands Novelties O. Office t �,.+:r•. ,,,,.: �.. .___—:.:�.Y.__� r• •ti,,• k.w..,_ ,,w4•t .... ...,.c.h+r ...'' .a?:Irt• Y ,. '.s.•r ,r�•:.w, �`1.l ,. ,,.,,, ,,. P. Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic; processing (no more than line (1i) devtiw,iing machine) S. Shoe stores Sporting goods T. Tourist related public ar:d semipublic buildings, services and facilities Travel agency Y. Yacht brokers (no storage) (b) Ncw construction. gsta l shment. or a chanae-W 1the following uses may be permitted Jn_MtjV1 $LJ subject to 1he approval of a Corditional Use Permit: A. Arcades Automobile service stations H. Health and sports clubs I L. Liquor stores M. Motels ind HotCls_ P. PalmanpdI Parking lots and ffiV,?& Varhln&= . ,. 3 R. Reducing salon RestaLTants Residential AMA Retail sales, outdoor (r) yisi for-servin commercial uses must be a art of all developrnens proposed In thisDistrict, xr��l/rfticJfbird4��'� hitliJh/dhS/t `, Jhl �hft.`rtt 6tl47ydji4WJkiz)VAbWlrliAf/idIM%b'1eW- k 1foldiAbyd, and'the entire street le ve l. must bbe/ ddeevlot1edto �vIsItor-setr1vinug�)lusse�st:�/I`t,�1t/�MJt`h�j/� 1r► YV I iu/�/1 W�4�iL 1I lW lV N r Cl�7f/l Y�IIM1RiI�C���C71 t�iC/Cf JYV N d t/IiTii�/WV 61, 6t/�UI'��fldt;6r,�flStf sS/(1'/b3/df/t�elf b(b3/�?'�6(�tbbi/�/htd�Ut�fi�iht�i��dlfh (d) Ref dendal uses are allowed only In conjunction with visitor-serving commercial lees. The required visitor-serving comrnercVal portion of any initial construxtion shall be pra'irided prior to or at: the same time , as any residential portion. No residential unit- shall, 'be occupied until the; required commercial portion Is completed.Proiects , which Wsed to be. Phan use. RrMrtJQna1pJY-develg,p the CoMmercial and resideeti 1 co11TIatlyl 4,3.02 ,61mti'm 6, rrceI . The minimum parcel size for development shat!`bc 14,OQ0 so.-ft. of net 1itrar11 Ud one hundred (m) feet of frontage on PCH. ir ..66.. (0084 D) 4.3.03 Maximu".n DensilyfulusW. The maxinsum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shalt increase as parcels size increases according to the following: LQt Size (Frontage) Maximum AI owable Resiclendal Density 100' up to but !ess 1 du/1700 sq. ft. of net for area than a half-block half block up to but 1 du/1350 sq. ft. of net lot area less than a full block' full block* 30 units per gross acre ' Note: Consoiida,don of blocks which cross District boundaries shall only to required to provide visitor-serving uses on the part of the project in District #l. 4.3.04 Maximum Building Height. The maximum building helLht shall tw j thirty-five (35) feet and no more than three (3) stories. Exception: The maximum building height for full block parcels shall be fifty (50) feet and no more than four (4) stories. 4.3.05 blaxiMuM Site CQ CMg. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (so) percent of the net site area. 4.3.06 �.�Ft4ttt Yam. The minitnum front yard setback for all str--ictures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty-five (25) feet Isom Pacific- Q6ast .Hiehwav reht--of--way. This setback may be reduced to twenty (20) feet on sip to fifty (50) percent of the frontage, prorvided that the average setback for total site frontage is not less than twenty-five (25) feet. rhd s_tbnc area. sh3ILkeL1m1ld in p 1?Ing ordy--a Uball be designed to be co=iLi l__wJih_3bc Bluff T.Qp p1DS. L� �1 Sgd dross Pacific (`,ems 4.3.07 Ida Yard). The mittimum aggregate side yard requirements shAl! be as follows: (a) interior gdc yard g ck steal be AMNMI&k twenty (20) percent of lot frontage total with not less than seven (1) feet on a side. (b) Exterior side yard sethaCk Shali be tM&W4Wk twenty (20) perccnc of .at frontage total with not less than fifteen (15) feet, from any public ROW. 4.3.08 a thack eiar y j. The minimum rear yard a'etback shall be three (3) feet from thz alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Mote: An- additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. -67- (00$4Q) 4.3.09 Setbsk.(.2Rer. Storyl. The covered portion of all storles above the second shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet frun the second story facade. That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet In height shall be setback a minimum of forty-five (45) feet from the property line. Exception: Projects adjacent to Walnut Avenue shall require a minimum upper story setback of seventy-five (75) feet from lbt exter& MM property line. 4.3.10 Qpgn She. A public open space and pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director. may t e required for development pm,,ects one full block or greater in size; in order to assure a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. f i t � ' I 4.4 DISTRICT #2: RESIDENTIAL P�.a. This District allows residential development exclusively. On small parcels, medium densities (15 diVacre) are permitted and high density (35 du/acre) Is allowed on larger sized parcels. The density increases as parcel size Increases, providing greater Incentives for larger coas0dations. Consolidation Is desirable because multiple unP. development on larger parcels can 're sited and designed to accommodating more residences -while providing trcre open space, wider setbacks a.-A view corridors. While allowing higher densities, the D=strict employs graduated height limits and proportional setback requirements to keep the scale of new developments computable with the existing resic.entiai neighborhood. BoUndajJC3. District #2 includes the first block r%,ng PCH to W�inut Avenue between Goldenwest Street and 6th Streets except for the area Included in District #1. , 4.4.01 PCrMItt, Us'-S• Ih.."`f411OAM AIW./4?MiWVL Y/dttWhW residential uses shall be permitter! In_P-is Lct__ 92: multl--family housing, apartme ritt, condominiums and stock-cropera t Ives �d ',dEtt'/t'd!rVi C6�/i�t'�r�/l 'f�cl� JLWA ( to the3. ,2val ofa_Cm isi9j aL1L rtnU. ��fg�f.n�s�wh1S�wLtll_Aht dt'glWir�nl SMI&s-dA cif-P6tr1ZL_L.5'All be s blera . ouppraml-t.t_tke-Visim Rcvlew urd, 4.4.02 MIMMt!mLYsuCd_JIt;. The. min!mina pr:cr_1 size for development shall be fifty (50) feet of frontage ;Iti�1� .� �1 c foot,ne �� . 4.4.03 Masimum VejjxZ1n1es1.1j1 . The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall Jn7rease ns the parcel size increases according to the following: Lstt rF�ronta 0 Maximum easity less than 50' 1 du 50' I du/1,100 sq. It. of net lot area 51' up to 100' 1 du/1,400 sq. ft. of net lot area 101' up to but less than 1 da/1 ,150 vq. ft. of net lot area a half block i half block ur, to but less 1 du/ 900 sq. f t. rf net lot area -ban a full block full biuck 35 units per gross acre j Exceptlaa: Residual parccls with a minimum frontage of fifty (50) Nit sh311 be allow' is maximum density equal to but not to e:tceed the density of existing adjacent de.e!opmeats. i 4.4.04 N(uirnurn Nef t: 1 he maximum building helaht Shall be j thirty-five (35) feet and no more thar, three (3) stories. Exception: The maximum building height for full block or Iarger parcein shall be fc.ty--five (3S) feet and no more than tour (4) sta 1es 4.4.05 Maximum Site Conrage. The maximum site coverage shali L 7fty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.4.06 Setbsrk (Front Yardl. The minimum front yard setback ft,r ill structwv-s exceeding forty--two (42) Inches In height shall be its ;ollows: (a) Parceh*- fronting on PCH, require a mliatajuu 51:sbark a tw.tnty�-� (25) feet. This sCtbac' shaj .. milsti� �, p Ab" bg destlllt;i)_I� .f� �G1�..with: Il�iilu alns,ls�:. led secs Par fir Coast JilghW3�i fnb 'efs i,'RYrIxr 'J�rjr�r �tE�trE',tft Note: This setback ,mays be reduced by five .'(5) feet on up to fifty '(50) percent of the frontage, provided that the average setback for the tot-M site frontage is not less than the greate-" of the above. 00 ti } (b) Parcels fronting all other sti Bets Except PCH, require fifteen (1S) feet. This setback may be reduced to eight (8) feet on up to fifty (50) percent of the frontage provided that the average setback for the total site frontage Is not less than fifteen 115) feet. 4.4.07 satback..L`.�isie�'1. 1. The minimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follo i- : (Z.) Parcels with one hundred 000) feet or leis of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on a side. Exterior yards require not less than five (5) feet from a public ROW. Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (2S) foot wide lot*, will be ailowed an exterior yard teduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. Note: Twenty--five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: I) adjacent property is under same ownership and developea at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet Is provided on the opposite side yard of both properties; 3) no portion of a building at a zero lot Hne is closer than si.�- (6) feet to an adjacent building, if the buildings are not abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less tr.-In a half block of frontage require twenty (20) percent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any Interior yard, and no+, Iess than fifteen (15) feet for an extericr yard, from a public ROW. (c) Pa.-cell with greater than a half block of ftyintage require not less than seven (7) feet on any interior yard and not lest; than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from 2- public RO%V. 4.4.08 Ss:t�ta�k,.�a�.Y.;�'��� The minimum rear yard setback shall be 3s follows: (a) Parcels fronting on PCH require not less than three (3) feet. Nr: a: An additional right-of-way dedication will be required to widen the alley to twenty M 1-16 ,(,_114) fret. (b) Parcels fronting all other streets. except PCH, require not less than seven :and one-half (7.5) feet. Structures may be cantilei/ered into this setback, however, not closer than two and one-half (2.5) fret from the rear property line. 4.4.09 .Lt ack (Upper 51gu.). The covered portion of all itatCwra t UMA above the second 1tva shall be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. Tht t portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of forty-five (45) feet from the v&rrk.1 property line. Exception: Projects adjacent to Walmit Avenue shad require a minimum upper sta.ry setback of seventy--five (75) feet from that property line. ..i 1.. (0084D) t 4.4.I0 [41 ergle is 1 ind i —lk w m five (2SL�a ' baCk. a4nv Pacific Oca-L. � frR l i�1Ck_ LQw_s3LfSS common LS 120--n ace,-_Any m1cmShCten.ts-i 4 (b) No p;:blic open space shall be required in this District. 4.4. 11i4ltlSo Prv-rsi4lLrj�ly. A portion of District #2 is designated with an Oil Suffix (0, 01). Within this area, all the requirements of the r,�sour:.e production overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). F (DO84D) . z 4.5 DISTRICT #3: VISITOR-SERVINIG COMMERCIAL ,Ej 5e. This District Is limited to the five blocks fronting on Pacific Coast Highway across from the City pier. he visitor-serving category is broad enough to include many commercial activities which will also serve the needs of the surrourdinE community, providing an off-season clientele for the District. The plan also allows residential and office uses In this District so long as the required visitor-seeing commercial is provided. Large amounts of ground level open space are encouraged in this District to further promote the feelin; of openness and to provide additional view opportunities. �U�.�.. District #3 includes the area between PCH and Walnut. from Sth to Lake Streets. i --73- (003 4D) J 1 4.5.01 P Cd !Ise (a) New coQstruction and mmW shmant Q[ .She following usuJUG District .w.:,:�. S! be PSfEd t d subigCL to the rtD� '�• L �►Y a 5.9!]d1IJ_l2nal.Y s P rmit.Chnre oI th4'� 1. e-sh9Lh�.able� the ARtuD_V_Q1_%2LL1m Dire tQr, (a) �'hI�/lfb�Jt�ri1��//�rfill�ifllir�!/�d`kl!/�.Gr'!/i�J'►�t�v/,L����ft�f���//L�' �ifd,bt{�Y��/�hh1.(ltSd���'fztir f�a/,trS/Dfs(�i►'�Kt�.3�lP�tt!�l<<t/ib����f�fl,��`,f ra{t�i df/IJl7c�r�,tlil,I dt��I��JF',(T'�'r�z�fby,(r4�1 f�Y,ltd,'S�(tL�4f fKi.•.t/: A. Antique stores Art gallery B. Bakeries (no more than seven (7) employees) Banks and savings and loans branch offices (no drive-up windows: not to exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet) Barber. beauty, manicure shops Beach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat and marine supplies Bookstores f C. Clothing .Stores Coin, stamp and art dealers Confectioners Curio shops D. Delicatessens F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Game Stores Gifts and party shops 1. Ice cream parlors J. Jewelry stores L. Laundromats within hotels or motels Nf. Marine Insurance N. Newspaper and magazine store. Newstands Novelties P. Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic processing (no more than one (1) developing macbfne) W74-- S. Shoe stores Sporting goods T. Tourist related public and semi-public buildings, services and facilities Travel agency Y. Yacht brokers (no storage) (b) New MMIES'1.esta11L ►�.f~D"u chance to I the following uses irLMIUkL'Y_J may be permitted rz{iDWIt`.f A7 subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades Auditoriums C. Cabarets Convention facilities! D. Dance halls and discos Dancing ancVor live entertainment as a primary or accessory use 179VOI&M H. Health and sports clubs Hotels and motels L. Liquor stores M. Museums P. Pe •netts Parking lots and Smrjjbi, ,sAnIc=s R. Reducing salon Restaurants Residential usesP Retail sales, outdoor T. Taverns VJWAWINYtt Af.}tf iMYY Theaters f�b�b�JII,�Ir��l�(�/1`s'I�tl�trSbit�f/d rye/�ftSf�dlff�4ht/[�`/�rl�(�Y1�+Yttb�t"i��l6tl litilti✓f�f.'bb't'. Nc�l�llll�/�fd[,f/dJtYd�4tlbi/�4'�dt/r�E�lbV�flf�fS1.'fit!►'16�.��fti�/t�iYl�.�lE,tli WIAW&WledlAoWt6t ldIV Vdh1tddb%1/ddt151f fAfY111A1A6WiMV11dr1IJ1fP (S41j/��ft�.bfft/b�9'f11S6►lLtt�6�J11���bV/��'d�lllldt�l�t�lJ:�i�/�t�d�l.Vil?�ul�t3� ( Visitor--serving commercial uses must be a part of all development proposed In this District 3yith frontage 0 NlaJ13 Street, with a Nft{3'r M requirement that the entire street Level//hY/Afr/AhWf 6WAT.[fd/MBY69/tW/tAUA Qn-Main Stan floor area be devoted to visitor-serving commercial uses. nM�wv,�r*1/�t��tzt���rta�rr�/�t�,rr.������c�t�rrntr��������d✓���a [�/�ttE/�IPrV�!(�'Z6.Jlf��Udf/l4ttilf�/f�Ubt/t'. nTdtbt//Rot{iE��E/„��.lOc`/�f./t'�/tUrd.dl�iY,(�f1Sl/rf/l�t�4.�E13'dtS//+I TiM/�.�lld/l�tl�I t"dg Otttt��r�r/�cr�ll/��lu�/�,�.�l�cr��v<ri�y,��/rn.�/��/��i/,�r�r��►�,�arti �4��tt�l��1►1.6M.thb'�4I�1P�11��btb4tlt/�fd f1�+'d4r'7Ib(J�ft�'.kif���rd�y�.�!!ft.�!//�cSj�c�,t.� ai&AvhimlYIdelIAtigVe 45LtbyW1kv/M161O.tAval(r/z)/df/:Z1 IY.W14tth!httdjlAM (�'J tY�Ard�hrbl,E.vu/Ihf�i1,f.K///df//tlht�afE//ANdI//irt+t//AIIdAI�d/i,�tril5l//Ah tbtfN tGf.J6WAd WN h(AW4 UMJ*Wd N M Ubibl 11MbYJ111h4111W4Wi6d ���rt'�r�r��/t�r� �r�r�s�t�ranr��/�t7ylydrr>~�rvlsat��t�tr�rv��n rid lit d4tflttd/�t,(6!�/tb��/�1/tY��Sf dt�/trrff�t/A/c/b+.ly/t�,d db4tf�Y�b���bEt. df/tTrit ,=fit �hi�eJ}obi:NSbtr//Nc�fd�8rdll�tlh'.�IdflT b(/dt/,tlht� iitFJl�tfA 4.5.02 hiini um-P_arcel Size. The minimum parcel sire ,or development shall be ten thousand (10,000) square feet of net site area and one hundred (100) feet of rrontage. 4.5.03 Maxim M j nsitvLIntensicy. The maximum Intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratios (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio shall apply to the entire project area. door area ratios shall be calculated on gross acreage, except that tee resulting floor area may not exceed by more than fifteen iIS) percent, the permitted floor area calculated by net site area. i (a) The maximum floor area for developments In this District shall be calculated with the following multiples: i Lot Size Lhxlmum.E.AR less than hair block 2.0 half block up to but less 2.5 than a full block full block 3.25 multi-block 3.5 -76- (0084D) r (b) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall increase as parcel size increases according to the following: LQt.�.ize (Frontagu) MaMmijm Allowab a—Merit zY 100' up to but less than a hair l du11 ,700 sq. ft. of net lot area block half block up to but less I dui 1 ,350 sq. rt. of net lot area than a full block full block 35 units per gross acre 4.5.04 g.ipi&hl. The maximum building height shall be as follows: I"ot 511C Iigighi less than half block 3 stories half block up to but less than a full block 4 stories full block (northwest of Main St.) 6 stories full block (southeast or Main St.) S stories multi-block (northwest of Main St.) S stories multi-block (southeast of :Main St.) 81.12) stories 4.5.05 Macjtnum ,Shp.. C y l=. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (30) percent of the net site area. Exception: Parcels fronting on Main Street shall have a maximum rite coverage of sixty (60) percent of the net site area. 4.5.06 5!C[baCL(Frort. _Yard). The minimum front yard setback far all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches In height shall be fifteen (15) feet. i Exception: Parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets tnay be reduced to five (5) feet. Parcels fronting on Main Street must develop to a build--u:-line• five (5) feet from the property line. *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to five (3) feet of the property line: 1) the facade of the ground floor level; 2) a plaza or patio USLd for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two (42) Inches in height), planters or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (50) percent of the frontage along the lot tine; 4) two (2) side walls and second story facade. Note: The following may be permitted In the front yard setback on Sth Street, 3rd Street, Main Street and PCH: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens ami open-air commercial facilities. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting on PCH or' five (5) reet, for additional parkway and sidewalk; and ten (10) feet for parcels fronting on Sixth Street. r -77 (W84D i > 4.5.07 Suba k (Side Yard). The nulnimum aggregate side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting on Sixth, Second and Lake Streets require twenty (20) percent of lot frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet for an interior yard and not less than fifteen (15) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. (b) Parcels fronting or. Fifth, Main and Third Streets and Pacific Coast Highway require i.ero for an Interior yard. Exterior side yard requirements shall equal the front yard setback for the respective street. 4.5.08 hack (Bur Yard). The minimum rear yard setbach shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (36) feet. 4.5.09 Setback ( In _gr StQa). Upper story setbacks for this l,iatrict shall be as follows: (a) Parcels fronting PCH, 6th, 2nd and Lake Streets require all stores ' above the second to be set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ultimate street ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from the ROW, providing that the average setback on upper stories is no less than twenty-five (25) rev. (b) Parcels fronting on 5th and 3rd Street require that any part of the building facade greater than twenty-five (25) feet in height to be set back at least fifteen. (15) feet from the front property line. (c) Parcels fronting on Main Street require that no building or portion of a building exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height, within forty-five (45) feet of the build-to line. � (d) That portion of structures exceeding thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from the interior side yard property line. (e) Parcels on 6th Street require all stories above the fourth to be set back an average of une hundred and twenty-five (125) feet from the ultimate street ROW. 4.5.10 All development project!; within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum or ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose. (a) All structures taller than four (4) stories shall provide an additional two and one half (2.5) percent of the net site area for public open space for each additional story over four. —78— (0084 D) t - (b) Full block develupments on Main Street require public plazas at the corner of PCH and !`lain Street. These street level public plazas shall be incorporated into the design of the eevr.lopment and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side must face Alain Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet. • Landscaping: not less than. thirty (30) percent of the plaza area should be planted. • Paving: all paved areas shall be textured. Visual Feature: plazas must include a sculpture, fountain. information kiosk, pond, display, or similar visual amenity. j Public Seating shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the plaza area may be used for ctpen air commercial uses. 4.5.1 I -estri�In Overpass. Pedestrian overpasses/underpasses may be required to connect the development in this District with the City and State Beaches as a condition of approval for any new development on, or further subdivision of, parcels within the District. The City may waive this requirement if the City determines that overpasses are unnecessary or impractical considering the type and design of new developments. ' i E � I 4.6 DISTRICT #4: F.IJMUPUSf ADFRIQU RESIDENTIAL e1jMgse, This District flanks the DoM ntown core area, separating the area along Main Street from the outlying areas which are primarily residential. The purpose of this District is to provide a dal UtfMUM zone ife A bgtweep the existing residential areas and 16 the commercial Main Street corridor. Cld� �if�(t. /dflhffl .t�atid��f�l'4tt�ht3bUdfits�fb#,i�` ��htl�t��dl ?his Dlstrlct allows residen is dcvelopMent t&Cluslvcly. - On smalIjaU- dj. medium de 1sities (15 are permitted ansL.hlghSs�epSity f35 dt t'e is allQwed on lamer sized oa[cela,- Thdensity—ma l'�5 5 a�. parcel- III& jnsfeases. orszidim-Em aim Jric e mivus t_laricr cunsolidatl nc�. s. _,WbL'Ig, allow-Ine hider t emoloYs-=du t he lim!ts and Rr4P4 i!2nal S to teach requiramizats- tQ, keen t e scalc,_Q1 nt_w deYesot? U$ cnmp-Atabk yjtb r ssid0dal ticlghbgrtmd., Boundaries. District #4 includes the half-blow:-ks on the northwest side or the Main Street core area from 6th Street to the alley between 6th and 5th Streets; and from the alley between 3rd and 2nd Streets to the alley between 2nd and Lake Streets, between Walnut and grange Afenues. 'j ..SD.. (00341)) . ,t. 4.6.G1 p rrri led 11ses. The fallowing t11A4W rgsidgntlal uses rrlttilMAlfi1 tbfUftt.U6N/dr1AUbKt'ti & shall be permitted in District #4: multi-family housing, apartments, condominiums and stock cooperatives subject to fm approval of a Cmd1 oral Use Permit f6t 1;MMJVbUW/&.Sbii: .Wde_Ea.mllY__Rgcached Dwellings which comma wjthe dcvclgPn= Iar1 GIs n i7istricc a �h 1L�€SI.�Zis.�I.5g thcmpnsyaLl2LihcJDsaizaRtv-it:-w (ly indudiogsr��r�i/,r�t�u}►ri/�.r t`1�tdd�11S1 df:S�!/l tl�/116bS!/,t�d�drt��t/f��/�J�tU/t�J/�l/�1 tEl/��fi t'd(�.fr461//Tii/6fic�.l'�il��i�,Y�tl'd�frlli,t'tUL��l�t�.lT/i{�,t/b�f�ttt�dtFlh�.�tllt�tiu� to OfrAye .hf//,14vcif 16audtlredu (pry XI1�fE Srt//NJ!/it4ttci/�1��(dt�ilfi�Y�4jlfltE//E:'�f//l t�lt�.i[s'r'.fif/�ti fi'A-lYr6t: � �bb'�rLE.f,.hfi,�:3�IdbEf/�lt/YdL3��hZ1a1/dSt�� / ace,��/�atrtit�Jd�/rrJ�-��r�.t�►��. w�t�r�r�r� / a�. J�! ►�ltly �d�t� Ott►r�Nr �.>�hlt�/t �d}' �a�F.r.�t�r�►�vr���/�r�r���t�c�r�t�/�tt���tr►������.�a.��r�tt�►�/��a �y��rhi�r�/��tr��Env�nr�•h�lb�lr��t�r��tr�tvr����trr�r��c / B�J�t�t/8h�it/(�'��'ri�{1`1I�Plr��L>�Ibh`./•r�l / li�l.�tSf�/btfJpN(a(►r���i.th(t�lt�/tSf/1�Vd/�1"/rS,Cti��fl'. � / R'�ltb(�'.�'itt�ldd�lt+l/,��d,�li�fl�,�btb�lb(/ttldl�'�,llbt�'/�G�lb�d}1bU6 l 11d�1'd,t L/16lYketuf/�i[/t�l 4.6.02 hUnlmum parSg1 1ze. The minimurn parcel size for development shall be twenty--five hundred (2500) square feet rind twenty f25.j fs S..Qi3t:2.f1t8jtr• 4.6.03 MUirnum Densily/Ititclsily. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall increase as the parcel size Increases according to the following: r^" Lot Size lFrontae,!. less than 50' 1 du so, 1 du/1700 sq. ft, of net lot area 51 up to 100' 1 du/1.100 cq. ft. of net lot area 101 ' up to but leis than 1 du/1150 sq. ft. of net lot area a half block half block up to but less I du/900 sq. ft. of net lot area than a full block full block 35 units per gross acre 4.6.04 IN-laxtmirt B.", SlLng Nei,h� The maximum building height shall be thirty-five (35) feet and no more than three (3) stories. i Exception: The maximum building height for full blo;.k parcels shall be fifty { (50) fee: and ro more than rota (4) stories: 1 4.6.05 z aximlAC1l_ Site ve The maximum site coverage sh.1ll be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.6.06 Set cats k(Prot Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding farty-two (42) inches in height, stall be fifteen (is) reet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required for parcels fronting oi, Sixth Street, of ter. (10) feet. 4.6.07 Set a!Ck (Side Y-Ltt). The minimum aggregate zldc yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Parcels with one hundred (100) feet or less of frontage requirm. twenty (20) percent of the lot frontage, with not less than three (3) feet on a side. Exterior yards require not less than rive (5) feet from a public ROW, Exception: Garages located on a single twenty-five (25) foot wide lot% will be allowed an exterior yard reduction to not less than three (3) feet from a public ROW. • Note: Twenty-five (25) foot wide lots may have a zero interior side yard setback on one side if: l) adjacent property is tinder ;--%me ownership and developed at the same time; 2) at least five (5) feet is provided on the opposite side yard of troth pivpertl^s; 3) no portion of a butlding at a zero lot line is closer than six (6) feet to an adjacent building, IF the buildings a-,•e no: abutting. (b) Parcels with greater than one hundred (100) feet but less than a half block or frontage require twenty (10) percent of the frontage, with not less than seven (7) feet on any !nterior yard, and not less than fifteen (15) fret for an exterior yard, From a public ROW. (c) Parcels with greater than a lealf block of frontage require not less than Seven (7) feet on any interior yard and not less than fifteen (IS) feet for an exterior yard, from a public ROW. 4.6.08 a-P k (ear Yam. The minimum rear yard setback shall be three (3) feet from the alley. Strurtures may be can, ;levered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication m y V)9 be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) f%::t. 4.6.09 Se3back(UoFrr S!oa). The covered portion of all stories above the secand shall be set back an average of vventy-five (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. Up to fifty (50) percent of the building frontage may be set back fifteen (15) feet from '#hey ROW, providl.-tg that the average setback on upper stories is -.Yj less thn.i twenty-five (25) feet. That portion or structures which exceed thirty ive (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of rurty-five (45) feet from the exterior property lines. SQQsrL5Dacj, No public open space shall be required in this UIstrict. -93- ( 084 D) Wrl.r►d 4,7 DISTRICT' #5: MIXED-USE; CO'N,%.iERCIAI./OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL &rp . This District include: the blocks on either side of and Including Slain Street, and constitutes the oldest commercial area in the City. The purpose of this District is to re-estaolish the area as the Downtown for the City by creating a more urban atmosphere, en:ours,ing relatively higher intensity development with viable commercial office and residential uses. View corridors along with height and orientation restrictions in the development requirements of this District are intended to focus development on the Main Street corridor. The ?.lain Street-pier axis is intended to be an active, vital and interesting pedestrian way, intersecting; wim and complementing the visitor-serving; commercial area an FC1•i and the pier area. The District promotes rr.ixed uses of commei"cial, office and residential developments. 1�sur,�tic . District 45 Includes the area from the alley between bth and Sth Streets to the alley between 3rd and 2nd Streets and the Lake Street frontage (on the northwest side) from Walnut to Orange Avenues. I 4.7 01 permlived 1iscs. (a) blew consirurtlon ;4!1dL_W4bl12h LALtbi: r4.119wiit uses_ In Qistrict #5 shall bf:,..� r:aLtSes�...'f ect t royal of a Conditigua) Use Permits__rare of t av_ihall..bt z01act to the ayo ovalof the Director. try ��/!lb11�lTd�J/�iidd��//��/l�,ffl/lY�/l�fl��'Vl�lfdl�ttLElfi�ld//b�" ftfdl.�tfd��!l�f�dulY��ld fhtl'��l�d/l�S/!3�'�t'�l�t,ahl�,��t�'lt�l�tl t�lfh'}.11 df/�/GJ�4f}{f,f df�lY�L�rP�4��ffiRllbi/l�tii?'1.Y�d�.�t�flt'rE�dl. A. Antique stores Art gallery B. Bakeries (not more than seven (7) employees) Banks and savings and loans branch off ces (no drive--up windows) ` 135rber, beauty, manicure shops C S ach, swimming and surfing equipment Bicycle sales. rental and repair Boat and marine supplies I Bookstores C. Clothing stores Coin, s.amF and art dealers Confectioners Curio shops G. Delicatessens 1 Drug s tcres Dry cleaning (no plants) F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Gifts and party strops Groceries N. Hardware snores Hobby suprplies 1. Ice cream parlors 3. Jewelry stores L. Laur+..dromats M. Marine insurance Meat or fish market,:: Millinery 14. Newspaper and magazine stores Newstands Novelties (0034 r 'O. Office Supplies P. Paris Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photo phic rocesiin � P g S. Shoe repair Shoe stores Sporting goads Stationery stores T. Tailor shops Travel agency Y. Yacht brokers (no storage) (b) hLaw_SQns=etiQn, C. UShtrent, or th"huge-AQ Ishe following uses In 121st ct -#-� may be permitted 1'd/Mdlt IMI/AW/subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades C. Cabarets D. Dancing and/or live entertainment as a primary!accessory use Department stores Dog and cat grooming DW/Jt5 W F. Furniture stores H. health and sports clubs L. Liquor stores hi. Museums O. errrAfd/1vWj Pe:L shops Pe[M= t parking lots and pafkli}n. st=um ibb 'ga Plazas Public open space BMW and =1 %N1cLb9U11n--Z3- R. keducing salon t uldential RrWAYdi Retail sates, outdoor T. jAu �. 1w Nate: The ground floor AM or street level of al,1 buildings011na M.al Sheet In this District shall be devoted to commercial activitle3. Al ����tl�ifrtr�l�sv�►l�+r�rd�twlarr��i,�,�rtir���v��ui��it����r►�ivat�s SfEb4t��it�YYx��tlQtSbEtltbltl�NlSf/�f�l#,l�f�f�tlMt�t4�tt��. (c) The following uses may be permitted above the first floor: (1) Commercial Use - all commercial uses allowed on the first floor If the uses are a continuation from the first floor use. (11) Office Use - professional, general business and non-profit office provided that: • No salas either wholesale or retail which involve delivery of any goods or material to or from the premises occur. • No inventory it kept on the premise other than samples. • No processing, manufacturing, storage or repair of merchandise of any kind occurs. (ii1) Residential Use - Residential uses are allowed only in con;ut«tion with commercial uses in this District. Up to one--third (113) of the floor area of projects on parcels smaller than a full block may be devoted to residential uses; projects on .*,Ill block or larger parcels. up to one-half (112) of the floor area may be devoted to residential uses provided that residential uses to thc�LCILq_wills: • Be segregated to a separate structure or restricted to the Second story or above; • Not occuPy any portion of the same story with non-residential uses, unless they are provided with adequate physical and acoustical separation; • Be on contiguous noors within a single structure; • Be provided with separate pedestrlau Ingress and egress; • Be provided with secured, designated parking. Note: All uses conditionally permitted on the first floor shall be permitted In upper story areas, If they are a continuation of first floor uses. Other uses shall be permitted only if found to be Compatible with office and residential uses nearby or within the same mixed-use structure. 4.7.02 Ai131rnutn Pare. The minimum parcel size for development shall W. twenty-five hundred (2500) square feet and twenty-EIme -.M 4,f ��••rr���,���pp .1 1 47•- (0O84U) 4.7.03 Ma m DusityLlnignsL , The maximum intensity of development shall be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area ratio sr:all apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratios shall be calculated on gross acreage, except that the resulting floor area may not exceed by more than fifteen (15) percent the permitted floor area calculated by net site area. (a) Tfie maximum floor arez for developments in this District shall be calculated with the following � . g multiples: LQj -Size (Frstn ► ximum EAR less, than half block 1.5 half block up to 2,0 but less than a full block full block 2.5 (b) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units (du) shall increase as parcel size increases according to the following: Lot Size (Fro ttani hdi1xim! M Allt1ab1 s-UY. less than 100` 1 du/2000 sq. ft. of net lot area 100' to to but less than a 1 du11700 s . ft. of net lot area. P q half blo.a: half block up to but less 1 du/1350 sq. ft. of net lot area than a full block Lot I 1 _(E=ard k1aJxmun3 Allowa kJQmity full block 35 units per gross 4.7.04 L•iaxi tm The maximum building height shall be as follows: �Qt.�izs�(Ergtu.�g� H�isht less than a full block 3 stories full block G stories 4.7.05 Maxi=M 21 v Cage. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. 4.7.06 Setback Emp.1-Yar ). The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall L • fifteen (15) feet. Except!on: parcels fronting on Fifth and Third Streets may be reduced to five (5) feet and parcels fronting on Main Street must deveiep to a build-to line* five (5) feet from the property line. +, *Note: The build-to requirement can be satisfied by extending any of the following to five (5) feet of thy: property line: l) the facade of the ground fluor. level; 2) a plaza or patio used for open-air commercial activity; 3) a low-wall or fence (not exceeding forty-two'(42) inches In height), planters . or other architectural features, which extend along at least fifty (SO) percent of the frontage along the lot line; 4).two (2) side walls and secomi story facande. .-88- (0084 D) - Note: The following may be permitted In the front yard setback on Fifth Street, Third Street, plain Street and PCH: benches, bicycle racks, transparent wind screens and open-cir commercial facilities. 4.7.07 Setback (Side Yard). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements shell be zero. (b) Exterior yards require five (5) feet from a public ROW. 4.7.08 Sgtback (Rear AAEM. The minimum rear yard setback shall be three: (3) feet from the alley. Structures may be cantilevered to the rear property line. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4.7.09 ,j;c (Unger 51QU). The covered portion of all stories above the second` shalt be set back an average of an additional ten (10) feet from the second story facade. Parcels fronting Main Street require atI structures above twenty-five (25) feet In height to set back an average of twenty-five (25) feet from the ROW with a minimum of fifteen (1S) feet. 4.7.10 flnen Space. Parcels having one htindred (100) feet or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area mast be provided for such a purpose, In all non-residential development. Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open space to five (5) percent of the net site area. Full block developments on Main Street require public plazas. These street level public plazas shall be Incorporated Into the design of the development and approved by the Director. Such plazas shall have the following characteristics: • Location: street level corner; one side roust face hiain Street. • Area: not less than one thousand (1,000) square feet. • Landscaping: not less than thirty (30) percent of the plaza area + should be planted. • Paving: ail paved areas shall be textured. • Visual Feature: plaza must Include a sculpture, fountain, + Information kiosk: pond, display, or similar visual amenity. • Public, Se.atang shall be provided. • Open Air Commercial: not more than fifty (50) percent of the plaza area may be used for open air commercial uses. ' l -•89- (0084 D) . i 4.8 DISTRICT #6: MIXED USE; CONIrtERCIAL/OF1✓ICE/RL•SIDENTIAL Pu=5e. This Wstr!ct encompasses the area north of the Downtown core and includes the public llbr�ry, it is intended to provide a location for t iehberhrxad �EfaiJ ¢b commercial enterprises to serve surrounding residents, as well as 61VWt4yWU public facilities and residential uses. W) t�I'�(�(r�l,�d+�►'�til t�lt/�1tt1';{l�I t}`,br,tt'Sam,KKttcS/dJ/fnb�t�.N/i9i'�t/@1�tfl d".�1� Buns. District #t6 consists of the blocks located between Sixth Street and take Street from Orange Avenue to Palm Avenue. i l �-9A-- (O�aR4h� ,. s I 4Ol.8. 1, 3 . . - per!rnit�,d U��. (a) NP.& cons itm arcd Pstab_lishmeot of the fotiQ�t�1I�.�.S�311 �IstrictA6 3ha14 S : RalnitLed.._.S1th;€c,t to thjr__Aboroval Qf a S.Onditi al Usq 2 crrnit. Chan9c Qf all be subicc -1p,_the a12-pr v31 of the Dire . ' (�fr Titto�//1b�16W1'�i�/�r�t?r�,i!/t�./�I/��1.,•Y►6r'/trtt�'�St�!/1,t�d��H��"i6��illbf ltftl,trUtb��tJ�tr�Ii/,tlr�/fSb���"Eftbtt/oft/a`�i�Et;ut/�Y/s��4/�htf/t�t{�/�f d�t�f1 df/�/f1'd/184Eldh�llr,Utt'/Bfld�i�llbt/ir�f i�'t?'/1d t�Et,Gdt'i6htl. A. Antique stores Appliance stores Art gallery Auto accessory/repair shops B. Bakeries (no more than seven (7) employees) Banks and savings and loans branch offices (with drive-up windows) Barber, beauty, manicure shops Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat and marine supplies Bookstores C. Catering establishments Clothing stores Coin, stamp and art dealers Confectioners Curio shops D. Delicatessens Department store: Drug stores Dry cleaning (no plants) Dry goods and nations F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores Furniture stores G. Gifts and party shops Groceries H. Hardware storey Hobby supplies F1'�dd t l'V r�.•htf.�i(tC,if l�!/�l'� 1. Ice c:ei:m parlors J. Jewelry stores ,. . L. Laundromats, iaundries 1 M. Marine insurance . Medical and dental laboratories Meat or fish markets Millinery N. Newspaper and magazine stores Newstands Novelties o. off;ces office supplies P. Parks Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic processing (no more than one (1) developing,` machine) Plazas 1�Y. !�'Ed[ib'ri���ffdn S. Slice repair Shoe stores Spc.rtin,g good, Stationery store's T. Tailor shops Travel agency U. Undertakers (b) New COS..[ C.11s2ll, SS I bment.- or a C ar&C,I.0 I she Following uses in District i26 may be allowed i'ffAWir A1091subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades D. Dance studio Dog and cat grooming EL Hulthi %raris Ma I� I�i��s.tQLes N. Newspaper publishing P. Pgrman.et t parking tuts and parMa&3==r-u tAWN Pet shops - Public open space Public and setni-public bulldings ' . R. z jag_njo Residential Uses Retail, sales. outdoor _y .. (0084i ) - y T. Theaters Transit facilities t1YdJ/�Stb�iQilctll'�lllfsl/ YUIdE /1�E1l�f�tlrl ttl �f/¢ t�/t1P/luM6adll�S�ts . �Vi�r��h�t•�di�l��� 4.8.02 Minimum P rcel Size. The minimum parcel size for development shall be ten thousand (10,000) squAre feet and ne huadfed (100) feet of r_Qa1U&- 4.8.03 Maximum bensi3YL tenSity. The maximum intensity of development shall l be calculated by floor area ratio (FAR) for this District. The floor area 1 ratio shall apply to the entire project area. Floor area ratio, shall be calculated on gross acreage, except that the resulting floor area may not exceed by more than fifteen 0 C) percent the permitted floor area calculated by net site area. (a) Me maximum Floor area for developments in this District shall b calculated with the following multiples: less than 100' 1 .25 100' up to but less than a half block 1.5 half block up to but less than a full black 2.0 full block 2.25 i (b) The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be twenty—five (25) units per gross acre. 4.8.04 Nfaxiaum Huilding ie1ZW,. The maximum building height shall be as follows: I&L51zc..LFununel ht:Ighl less than 100' 2 stories — 39 ('ert 100' up to but Bess than 3 stories — aLft.0 a full block full block 4 stories -- , AcA 4.8.05 hiax(ms;m S to o%,Coge. No maximum site coverage shall be required in this District. ; I 4.8.06 Sethach (Ergril Yard • The minimurn front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty--two (42) Inches in height shall be fifteen (15) feet; 4.8.07 LSidc--y rd). The minimum side yard requirements shall be as follows: (a) Interior yard requirements, for residential development, shall be ten (10) feet; non residential may be reduced to zero. yards require not less (b} Exterior y q than fifteen (15) feet, from a public ROW. _93 . (o014a) 4.8.08 Setback !Rgar_Yard). The minimum rear yard ;-etback shall be thron (3) fret from the. alley. Note: An additional ROW dedication will he required to widen the alley to thirty (30) feet. 4,8.04 ack-(Un per S.iocy)• The covered portions of all stories above the second shall be set back twenty-flue (25) feet from the ultimate ROW. 4.8.10 01n Space. parcels having one hundred (100) fret or more of street frontage, within this District shall provide a public open spar ,. P-rnenity. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the net site area must be provided for such a purpose, In all non-resldential development. Exception: Mixed use developments which include residential units, may reduce the public open snag to five (5) percent of the net site area. Ful'. block developments on Main Street require pubic h;a as. These street level P Pincorporated ubl;c lazas shall be into the design of the dtvclopmcnt i and approved b theDirecto r. li I, I I I I II I �q�.. (00g4 D) 4.9 DISTRICT #7: VISITOR--SERVING COMMERCIAL Purp e. This D:itrict extends southeast of the Downtown: core ad}actint in. Pacific Coast Highway. The principal purpose of this District is to provide commercial eacilides to serve seasonal visitors to the beaches as well as to serve local residents on a year round basis. This District also provides a continuous commerical link between the Downtown and the visitor-coMfperciallrecreation Distract near Be ch Boulevard. D and-uhu. District #l7 extends from Take Street to Huntington Avenue b.-tween PCH and the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. i i I ' sY 4.9.01 '� Il'i112 t 1L • , rc . . s iL .t �s. fs�ls a� s '(a) New , co Q . s sbal.L_:.be '.getmis tcd a aDt L LJ2�thc rector, A. Ant'.que stores Art- gallery 73. Bakeries (No more than seven (7) einployeei) Dank:s and: savingi and ik-rans bunch orfices (no: to exceed five-thousand (5,000) square feet) � Barber, beauty, manicure:shops Beach, swimming and surfing eV.lUipme.nt Bicycle sales, rental and repair Boat:and marine supplies Eookstores 'Butanical Gardens jiou ioug C. Clothing stores !Coin, stamp and art dealer Confectioners CuriJ shops D. Delicatessens, F. Florists Fruit and vegetable stores G. Game Stores Gifts and party shops Groceries (convenience) 1. ice cream parlors J. Jewelry stores L. Laurdroynats M. Marine insurance Meat oafish markets N. Newspaper and magazine stores Newt/ `ands Novesttes. ,; P. Photographic studios Photographic equipment sales Photographic processing (no more than one (1) 'de' ' OP rg machine) ffice ' P.[4�4 `(BQ •to exce.Cd fi f tv ,150I ' rct;IIis��t�I s4L anta) R'. . I���ldl#�i�t� • S. Shoe stores Sporting goods T. Tour'ist related public and semi-public. buildings, services and facilities Travel agency Y. Yacht sales (display only) (b) New 4nst-- 1 es'blisbment. or t.bsi to 11he'following'uses In 12 1 scLJC #Z may be 'permitted 1WA3191MW#1 subject to they approval of a Conditional Use Permit: A. Arcades Automobile service stations C. Cabarets D. Dance halls and discus Dancing and/or live er.:ertainment as a primary or accessory use Healtrtan snoc1LdO1 HoLeb and motels RC=,n= PBarking lots and p?j)ng jtructur 'VA $� $fit dng 'salcU Restaut��ts Detail sales, outdoor T. Taverns 4.9.02 Aqlnimum P&LCCL_5: .p. No minimum parcel size shall be' regvirLM for this District. However, prior to the approval'of any development, a master site plan ror the entire District shall be airyproved by the Planning Commission. Development, which is in conformanc- with the aitie plan may then be permitted. I -97- (0084D) 4.9.03 titttg. D (IX)20tensitY, The :maximum intensity of development shall be, calculated=by 'floor arearatio (FAR)' for this ,District. The floor area ratio -shall 'a. grosto a,'the ,':entire ro ect area. e r elated on gross, creage except jthat the resulting larea rrareoa may epic Y t exceed, by more than fifteen (15) percent the ' permitted floor area calculated by net site area. (a) The maximum floor area 'for deve:opments in this District shall be calculated with a multiple of 3.0. 4.9.04 Building 1 g g Maximum Bt�lldi Height. The maximum building height shall be eight (8) stories. 4.9.05 Maximum _ te__QQv ge. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of the net site area. 4.9.06 Setback (l; i Yard1. The minimum front yard setback for all structures exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be rift 50 feet from PCIi. � y ( ) i 4.9.07 Setback (Side Yardl, The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. 4.9.08 Setback(Re r Yam. The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet from the proposed Walnut Avenue extension. Note: An additional ROW dedication wIll be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.9.09 .. ?Ft:L��,r� No upper story setback shall be required in this District. 4.9.10 Qpen�Sl:�cr,. A public open space and/or pedestrian access amenity, subject to approval of the Director, may be required for development projects in order, to ass-ire a predominantly visitor-serving orientation. 4.9.11 �•s isi{�..1.�r.�1 �Si4D. Development In District #t7 shall require the � dedication of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue and PCH for public access betvieen the southern end of the Pacific Electric RO1Y and PCH. This requirement may be waived if an alternative public, amenity is provided or if the corridor is deemed unnecessary by the City. Any proposal fur an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. xYTt'hl'd/IISf�dl�(htrS,tlultra'd/atbf./�/.ifi�/ptb+�li�ibtfs�Jdt/�fl�ttlXldGiVEhttt'�e/I7l'�t�rt/t�/�� t?'ifthtzSfdrttt�c'o�i/��I�N�O f dtruii/delC7dcSt/��tatll,�t��ly,�6�h��'Se.'�r1t��JYB� i i (QOijAD) -.� ... . I I I 4.10 DISTRICT #t8: - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL p. se. This District Is intended to allow high density residential .uses. New residential development will'provide a population base to help support the commercial and office uses in the Downtown area. , ilgund District #S includes two consolidated '' parcels; one parcel is j bounded on the north by `Atlacita Avenue, on the cast,by Huntington Street, on the south by the proposed Walnut Extension and on the west by Lake Street. The second includes the area north of the proposed Walnut Avenue extension between Huntington Street and Beach Boulevard. i i I I I 4.10-01 PgrMllted Uses. The IVIM¢`.tl uses fatY//��'Sl t�fai��. shah permitted. In District #S Ath- subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, These uses shall, be limited to permanently attached., residential uses; including multi-farnily how Ing, condominiums, stack-cooperatives or apartments. -99- (0084D) { . 4.10.02 Mini�mi Pa "Cl Stze. No mint urn parcel .size shall be required rain .this District. . Howev,prii prior to approval of any development, a conceptual plan for.for'each`. ocaied Im the enWk District shalt be approved by the Planning 'Commission...,Development which 'is In conformance with the site plan may then be permitted. 4.10.03 M alum D��sj�y e�jty. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units shall be thirty-five(35) units per gross acre. 4. 10.04 hSa imum BuildUig He ght. The maximum building height shall be fifty (50) feet. � I 4.10.05 Mi1ximlIM Site Coveray&. The maximum site coverage shall be fifty (50) percent of net site area. 4.10.06 Setback (Front Yard). The minimum front yard setback ,fo- all structures I� exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height shall be twenty (20) feet. Note: An additional ROW dedication will be required to provide for the Walnut Avenue extension. 4.10.07 Setback (Sid Yard). The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Beach Boulevard shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 4.10.08 SgIbaCk (Rear Yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall. be twenty (70) feet. 4.10.09 Sc b�k (Upper Story). That portion of structures which exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height shall be set back a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from the northern exterior property line. 4.10.10 QRcn 512c.e. No public open space shall be required In this District. 4.10.11 CrQ�ssyiQA. Development in District #8 shall . require the dedication' of a twenty (20) foot corridor between Atlanta Avenue;and PCH for public access between the southern end of the Pacific Electric ROW,and • Ir an public enity is proviidedhor If the corridor is deemed unnecessary by hevCitybl Any proposal P for an alternative public amenity must be approved by the Planning Commission. 4.10.12 Ptc-ggi ra 1'roduc_tlg 'Overlay. A portion of District #8 Is designated with an oil suffix nai). Within this area all the requirements of the Resource Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4. 14). 4.10.13 � se al Y&Jay. A portion of District #8 has been designated with a ot conservation overlay. Within this area all requirements of the Conservation Overlay shall apply(see Sect Ion 4.15). 4.10.14 ll m ]Zlstrict. A portion of District #8 is zoned for mobllehome use. Withirc fts mobllehorne zoning area, the provisions of the hgobiSehome District of the Huntington Brach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). 100- (04840) 4.11 DISTRICT #9: CONIMERCIALIRECREATIOH Purjj�j!t. , The purpose of this District is to encourage large, coordinated development that Is beach-oriented and open to the public for Moth commerclal and recreational purposes. undartes. District 49 Is bounded by PCH on the south, Beach° Boulevard on.the east Huntington Street on the west, and o, the north by the pcoposed Walnut Avenue extension. 4 i 4.11.01 Tamil The .fQJJow n ONAM iM uses and structures shall be permitted In District #9 are subject to approval of a Condltional Use Permit. These commercial uses include hotels, motels, restaurants and recreational facilities. , ` 4.11.02 Mln mtm�YiECg Sixe• No 'Minimum parcel size shall be `ro iuired for this District. .,,However, prior to approval f a _Conti banal Us ermIt , ti gor • 'i ' df any development,- R master site plan for thy. , entire District shall be a tbved by the Planning Commission. Development, which is in conformancewpeh the site plan may`then be permitted. . ` Mi01"' (0084D) t. 4.11.03 M,ximstm pe .xyn�; The maximum Intendty of development sha11 be 'calculated'.by floor area"rratlo`(FAR) for this District. The jlo'or are.?, ratlo,'shall apply to :the :entire project area. Floor area raclos shall be, calculated on gross, acreage, except . that the. resulting floor area may not exceed by , mare 'than .`fifteen (15) percent the permitted ` floor area calculated 5y net Site area. (a) The maxlrnum floor area for developments In thin District shahl be calculated with a multiply of 3.5. 4.11.04 Maximum Buildina Height. No maximum building height shall be required. 4.11.05 Maximum Sits Cove. aee. The maximum site coverage shall be thirty-=five (35) percent of the net site area. Note: A maximum of twenty-five (25) percent of the net site area can'be used for parking and vehicular accessways. 4.11.06 Sgtback,jFrgnt Yard). The minimum front yard setback for all structures j j exceeding forty- two (42) inches in height shall be fifty (50) feet, from PCH and Beach Boulevard. 4.11.07 Setbaci; (Sidi Yardl. The minimum exterior side yard requirement shall be twenty (20) feet. Exception: The minimum exterior yard requirement from Desch Boulevard shall be fifty (50) feet. 4.11.09 Setback (Rear yard). The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty (20) feet. An additional ROW dedication will be required to Provide for the Note 4 Walnut Avenue extension. 4.11.09 Setback (Upper 5 toEy . No upper story setback shall be required. 4.11.10 Q= Space. Development projects within this District shall provide a public open space amenity. A minimum of twenty-y,ive (25) percent of: the net site area , must be provided for such a purpose. This area should._be available for public or semi-public uses for recreational;:purposes. Open space must have , irinimum dimensions of twenty-flve ,(25) feet` in each direction . Paved areas devoted to streets, driveways and'parking areal may not be counted toward this requirement. A maximum of fiftean (15) percent of the required twenty-five (25) percent may he enclosed recreation space such as gyms, handball courts, health clubs, Interpretive centers or similar facilities. A fee may he imposed for the use of such facilities. d.l 1.1l P dg nSLsMpu A pedestrian overpass may he a ui�ed f o connect the v development in this District to the City Beach, as co .d or approval for any new development on, or further subdivision of, parcels wlthin the Distrit. The City may waive this requirement if the City determines that overpasses are unnecessary or impractical considering the type ar►d design of new developments. - 4.11.12 me plsojct. A portion of Districct -#9 is zoned for rpoliiiehome use. Within this mobIlehome area, the provisions of the Aiobilehome, District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code shall apply (see Section 4.16). --lti2- (0054D) i `4.12 DISTRICT #10. PIER-RELATED CQMhtERC1AI. , This District is intended to provide for commercial uses on and alongside the pier which will enhance and expand _the public's use' and ' Uses are encouraged which capitalize on the views enjoyment o► this area. available . from the pier and the. unique recreational or eductttlonal opportunities it affords. At the same time, care must be exerciscd 'to insure . than the major portion of the pier will remain accessible to the public at no charge, for Strolling, fishing or observation. &jindarigg. District #10 includes the pier itselr and an area extending sixty (60) feet on the northwest side and one hundred a twenty--five ,125) feet on the southeast side of the existing pier. Also included in'the District is a strip of land from PCH to the sand, extending southeast of the pier to Lake Street arvd northwest of the pier to Seventh Street. i i I :r -103- (0084 D) 4.12. tsn. The Ol ermitte Us following uses gj ] ht + be permitted 14 District #10 subject to app Naval of a Conditional Use Permit. s` A. Acjuariurns B. Bait..and tackle shops Beach rentals C. Commercial uses or public recreatiwt facilities (beacli-related) M. Museums P. Parking lots that will not resift In the loss of rerreaflorial sand area. . Tiered parking is permitted within the �Downrown Specific Plan area on exlscing lots seaward of Pat;iflc Coast Highway provided the packing is designed so,: that ,'the top o!' the structures including 'v"alls..etc., are located a` a inimurn or ! one foot below the maximum height of the adjacent bluff. R. Restaurants (includin' fast food with take out windows) Retail sales (beach-related) Note: Only parking uses are permitted in this District northwest of Sixth Street. j4.12.02 bilal um- Parcel Size. No minimum parcel sire shall be reg i:red in this District. 4.12.03 Maximum..DensityLlatensity. Na maximum density or Intensity requirement shad be applied In this District. 4.12.04 Maxim urn Hrdaht. The maximum building heights shall be twenty-five (25) feet and no more than two (2) stories above the pier level. Exception: The maximum building height on the pier (exciwling the end of the building height htnshall tbeere or for lifeluard towers story, facilities p p No maxim 8 8 q g ies necessary for"public safety. No parking surface or structvae shall exce ►'S : the adjacent elevation of PCH. 4.12.05 Maximum Site QQvenge. No maximum site coverage shall be required. Exception: No more than twenty-five (25) percent of the pier shalt tA, covered by any building or roofed structure. In addition, buildings or other roofed structures shall not be constructed along more than twenty-five (25) percent: of the perimeter of the pier. 4. 12.06 Setback U ron )LuA. No minimum front yard setback shall be required. 4, 12.07 &.ibAd: (5idt Yard1. No minimum side yard setback shall bt: required. 4.12.08 Setbad,..tR =Asud). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required. (0034D i 12.09 Wa er Story). N minimum upper s. • ��,�C.k o tort' setback shall be,required. 4.1210 n spam Public `open.,,'space. and . pedestrian,:- access '.shall be: major conslderaclons of development 'ln this-;,Qistrlct. All nevi development;shall pprvide sufMlent'clear width along the' ' Iength`d •the pler'tor public access, emergency and aervice'vehicles. In sddition, public walkways along the pier edge or around the perimeter or new development must be provided. -105 (0084D) i C 13 DISTRICT #11: BEACH OPEN SPACE PuroosP. This District Is intended to preserve and protect the sandy beach and lia Downtown Specific .Plan boundaries while allowing parking area withthinn the D , Approximately h beach-related 'commercial and convenience uses., half of the beach frontage In the Distract Is Ci:y beach; the remainder Is owned by the State of California. Boundgrits. District #11 is bounded ,by PCH -on. on i e side and the Pacific Ocean on the other. The District extends from Goldenwest Street to Beach Boulevard, except for the area which is part of District #10. -106- (009410 (.79-rl 4.13.01 Eam, 92. Niw` anstructi. on - -establishment _QL-k' t t l ! f4U4Fxing use �n Dis tit #.11 sh,�tl �1, 1t� >�ifgl j�!`1 64#ttY AL L AM WdaW4i1A1taM be permitted in Distri t A 1 subjedt to ap;vwal of the Design Review BgaLti I,tbMi. A. Access facilities H. Basketball Courts Beach concession stands• Bicycle trails and support facilities i I.° F. Fire rings P. Paddleboard courts Parking lots that will not result in the leisof.recreatio'nai sand ;. area. Tiered parking is .permitted within 'the Wwntow . Specific` Plan area on existing lots seaward of Pacific-coast Highway provided the parking is designed so that- the 'tzp of the structures inc'.uding wails, etc., aru .ocated a m161mum of one foot below the maximum helm.& nf.t�.e: kJacent bluff. Park offices + playground equipmeat Public restrooms Public transit facilities and associated structures, dressing , rooms or showers" S. Shot-ullne construction that may alter . natural shoreline process, such as groins, cliff retaining walls, plpelines ,outfalIs that are designed to Olminate adverse impacts an local shoreline sand supple T. Trails (bicycle or jogging) and support facilities V� Volleyball net supports *Note: Beach concession stands shall be limited ' to twenty-five ;hun&ed r o loser than,-One thousand 1 c Intervals e and aced at In erva .. 4 u are feet t ) 'sq (1,000) feet. Beach cor:;:nssion structures stall be located within or Immediately adjacent to paved parking or access areas. *,,Note-, Public transit facilities mayonlybe constricted within the existing paved parking areas or in areas which are not part'o? :he beach. 4.13 GZ Mini rp rj P rCjLSIjg• No minimum parcel size shall be required . 4.13:03 Yi tlrn Dens %y:J tsnXhyI No maximum density or Intensity requirement shall be applied in this District. 4.13.0.4 NfaxIMUm _Mglgtit• The maximum building heights shall be limited to twenty (MG) feet. { -107. (00840) Exceptions: No .maximum -building height, shall be required 'for lifeguard towers or other facilitles nece!,sary for public safety. No parking surface or structure shall exceed the adja ent elevation of PCH. 4013.05 . g; Coverayr;. No maximum site coverage shall be required. 4.13.06back (F ror�q�. No minin�um front yard setback shall be rt.�qufred. 4.13:07 SVLbAQkLSjde .Y.art Sj. No iuin , imu-n side yard setback shall be rewired. 4.13.08 $ ask (Ream Yard). No minimum rear yard setback shall be required minimum upper stort' setback shall bL 4.13.09 �t'�.laac (Uvoer .�tstc�. No � � requtred. 4,13.'l0 Public ' open space anddestrian access shall be rna]or considerations of development in this District. 4. 04.11 Pa�..rkin . No additional parking shall be required for new development fit'this District. Construction which proposes the`removal of existird parking, shall provide for the replacement of that parking on a one" for-one basis within the District. 4.13.12 �'�g yCse Ewdu�tign Overlay. A portion of District #11 is designated with an Oil Saffir. (t ,01). Within this area, all the requiremen6 of the Res urce � Production Overlay shall apply (see Section 4.14). i i -108- (0004D) 011. DISTRICT OVERLAY MAP - 4.14 RESOURCE PRODUCTION OVERLAY j'_ e. The Downtown Specific Plan area c-rerlies icng--poductive oil pools. Many facilities are still operating because of the extent of the remaining reserves, therefore oil production will Continue to be permitted In parts of this area. The City provides for oil facillitles by designating ' oil "suffix" zoning Districts In confection with an upderlyinl base zone such as a commerclal or residential District. Both oil facilities allowed by suffix and the other uses; alloyed by the base zone, are permitted. Currently, the City has two oil suffixes the "0" which allows existing oil wells and attendant`facilities,but no new wells, and the "01" which allows the drilling of new .wells'in addition to all uses in the "0" District. These sufllxis,. with certain modifications, are also employed in this Specific Plan. In addition to the oil"suffixes three Resource Production Overlays have been identified. Existing : and/or expanded oil production may continue in these areas provided that the additional conditions outlined In this subsection are met. 4.14.01 Oil Overlay "A" The rel;slatlo;u In this overlay District`facllitate continued oil recovery, but require all new facilities to be concentrated into a ,screened, soundproofed and landscaped expansion of the existing, oii site and encourage the expeditious removal of existing wells from oil overlay 'Ii". $� �. C311 overlay "h" includes an existing oil island localted In District 920 between 19th and 18th streets from Pacific Coast Highway to the area is Walnut Avenue. Reeula�tions. New wells and related facilities shall be :permitted in accordance with the �-01 suffix and relater! provisions In the the Huntington Beach Ordiance Cede provided, however, that the following additional conditions are met: (a) Any new well must be hart of a secondary or other enhanced oil recovery project of uses! as a replac-:ment of an existing well.. (b) A schedule for abandonment of all wells operated by the project proponent which are located ,within' Bolsa Chlca State Beach sh211 be subinitted to and approved by the Director.of Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may W.amended at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. i a- (0084D) (c) The project proponent shall', agree to a memorandum of understanding with the City as a condition for approval, stating that no new wells shall be drilled by that' company on Bolsa Chica State Beach (oil overlay "B") nor shall the existing wells be redrilled except, In such cases where: , 1) the �redrllled well will be produced by a "subsurface" or, "down--hole" pump,only, or 2) the'redrilled well will be .produced by other new, technology ;with fewer visual and environmental impacts, than a conventional ball and `plunger, pump, or 3) an intensified screening plan Is' approved the the Director of Development Services which substantially improves the appearance' of the area. (d) The operation site hall be screened by, a wall, fence, or structure in keeping with the character of the area. ,The site shall: also 'he landscaped so as to ensure visual compatibility with the surriounding area. , A screening and landscaping plan must be submitted to and approved by the Director. All structures shall generally conform to the height limits and setback requirements of the base D::tract. The Director may waive these restriction If it would result in better overall soundproffing, odor reduction and/or visual compatibility. -1. 14.02 Oil Overlay "B" The regulations In this overlay facillate continued oil recovery, wells maybe redHiled if surface pumping units are replaced with a subsurface ones. Drilling of new wellr, may be permitted but only If the result Is a significate reduction In the amount of space used for oil operations on the beach. li Boundaries. Oil overlay "n" comprises a section of Bolsa Chica State Beach cwTently in oil productiion in District 0 11 between Goldenwest and I I th streets. $egv1811qns. Wells may be redrilled in accordance with the --0 suffix In the Huntington Beach Ordiance Code provided, however, that the following additional conditions are met: (a.) The operator submits a report to the. Department of Development Services explaning why there Is no other feasible, environmentally less damaging inland site (such a. report must' be approved by the Director); or.;agrees to a memorandum of understanding with the City stating that the redrilled well will be produced by a subsurface or down-hole pump or other n+ w technology with fewer visual and environmental Impacts than a conventional ball and plunger pump. (b) A schedule for abandonment of all wells .operated by the',project proponent which are located with'.n Bolsa Chica State Beach'shall be submitted to and approved by the Director or Development Services prior to the drilling of any new well. This schedule may be amended at the discretion of the Director of Development Services. (c;) All redriliing operations shall be limited to a period froni;October 1 to May 31, except for emergencies for which the Fire Chl,4f may waive these seasonal restrictions, but shall require soundproffing, in accordance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. 111- (0084D) New wells maybe permitted . ,_� � � are part, of an overall consolidation • ed i f they plan which'ilpificantly,,reduces the area uied'for oil -facilities 'or expedites the .rerno�raI ,of, existing., oil facilities within : the. overlay area. 'A consolidat{on plan must be submitted to the,-,, Director of Development Se rvices for; approvAi before a` permit for drilling any new well Will bs Issued. All drilling operatious must' be conducted in .accordance with the requirements of the 01 suffix in the Huntington Beach Ordlance Code. 4.14.:03 Call'Qverlay "C" The rlation`s egu in the overlay facilitate continued oil recovery and provides for future oll production needs. jj4undar y gu. . y p •ies. Oil overlay "C" is an irrN ularl sha ed slue in District 48A between Lake Street and Huntington Avenue and Atlanta'Avenue. RijbIations. Well drilling and redrilling;shall be permitted :in accordance with Title 15,of the Huntington Beach,Municipal.Coda and twlih the<0 or 01 suffix and, related provisions in��the .Huntington 'Beach Ordiance Code.. A conceptual site plan for the'endre overlay area must be submitted;Prior, to permitting any project 'developmint or subdivision of land within the ' overlay. The plan shall include'at least one oil island of slot less than two (2) acres .In sizefor new oil well drillingand oil P ted' Into the:overall deveto merit ion so :'that ch�island(s) shall .� reduction. : Su be .in'co ra noise, odor and visual impacts on the.residences are -minimized, and sare.16cess to:the oil site(s) is provided Findings',that at least one su►lh island so designed is Incorporated into the plan shall be shade by the Planning Commission before i approving any development project. I I i 4 ;5 CONSERVATION OVERLAY Puroose. The,conservation overlay Is intended to regulate those areas which have been preliminarily Identified as wetlands. Upon determination by the California Department of Fish and Game that an area Is classified as a wetland the conditions of this overlay shall apply Rou6dajy. The State Department of Fish and Game has identifled an area within District 88 as containing .8 acres of existing wetland and 1.4 acres of restorable wetland. The 2.2 acre area Is Immediately adjacent to Beach Boulev trd (see Figure 4. 14). . 'AJ=. Development shall be permitted only pursuant to an overall development plan for the en.Ire overlay area and subject, to the following. as a condition of any development on this parcel, topographic, vegetation, and soils Information Identifying tre extent of any existing wetlands shall be submitted to the Director. The information shall be prepared by a qualified professional, and shall be subject to review by the California Department'of Fish and Game. If any wetland is determined by the Department of Fish and Game to be severely degraded pursuant to Sections 30233 and 30411 of the California Coastal Act, . or If it is less than one (1) acre In size, other restoration options may be undertaken, pursuant to the Coastal Commission's "Statewide Interpretive Guidelines for Wetlands and other Wet Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas." Conservation easements, dedications or other "similar mectinnisms shall be required over all wetland areas as a condition of development, to assure permanent protection. Public vehicular traffic shall be prohibited in wetland areas govemed by...,a conservation easement. Specific drainage and erosion control requirements shall be incorporated into the project design to ensure that wetland arras are not adversely affected. No further subdivision of any,parcel shall ,be permitted which would have the effect of. dividing off environmentally sensitive habitat from other, portions of such,parcels for w ch urban uses are, permitted in the City's Coastal Element :until such time as the permanent protection of any wetland is assured. Within areas identified as wetlands in the coastal zone, the uses of the Coastal Conservation District shall supercede the uses of the FP1 end FP2 district, .I 1 CONSERVATION OYERLkY -MAP r �I :a j r ' �N �Y' 1 4.16 MOBILEHOME DISTRICT �. The Downtown Specific Plan Includes approximately 24 acres with a Mobilehome District (1NH) designation. The purpose of the Xfobilehome District is to permit present mobilehome park uses to continue. These mobilehome areas fall within Districts Seven, Eight and Nine of the Downtown Specific Plan. Boundaries. The Nfobilehome District encompasses parts of Districts 7. 8 and 9. The following describes the real property in two sections. Section One is approximately 6.2 acres in size located on the north side of Pacific Coast Highway between Huntington and Lake Streets. That'postion of tractional Section 14, Township 6 South, Range It West in the Rancho- Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, Stare 'of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book SI, pxge 14 of .Miscellaneous Maps In the office of the County Recorder of salt, county. described as follows: Beginning at the Intersection'of the centerline of Lake Street (formerly First Street) being parallel with and 37.50 feet southeasterly 'rneasured-147 feet right angles from the northwesterly line of Block '101, with the rwrth right-af--way line of Pacific Coast Highway (formerly Ocean Avenue),`also being the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of Block No. 10L all as shown on a MescellaneGus Maps in �h Hofflcetof Beach, recorded in Book 3, page 36`of p 8 p e County Recorder of said county; thence south 41'33'18" west 53.00 feet along, the centerline of Lake Street to the construction centerline of Pacific Coast Highway; thence .along said constructlon centerline the following, south 48 8'13" west' 53.00 feet .along the:centerline of Lake Street to the constriction centerline of-Pacific Coast Highway; thence along said construction centerline , the, ,following, south 48021142" east 98.26 feet to a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1200.feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central aresle of 4*5512$" an arc disthnce of 103.14 feet; . thence south. 53"17'11" east 109.26 feet ' to a curve concave to the northeast having`'a!radius of 3329 60 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 1'3017" an arc distance of 77.72 feet; thence south ,'54037128" east 400.00 feet; thence leaving said construction centerline north' 35•22'32" east 52.00 feet to the true point of begirining; thence south 54"37'2$" east 427.26 feet; thence south 59"15'30".east 263.04 feet to the southwesterly extension of the westerly line of "untington Street-, thence 37'S4'Sl" east 290.61 feet along said extension and said westerly line; thence north S4°05'09" west �115- (0084D) , - wes 0 ; thence south 55451 west 120 feet,SS 85 feet thence north. 57 fl5 09 west 7 thence south 57'32'32" ' 0.00 feet; thence north 12005'09" west 120.00 feet;'thence north'.35'5*4'51" east '130.'00 feet; thence north 54'005'09" :west 170.00 feet; thence south 35"54'51" west 80.00 feet; thence'north 89°05'09",west 70.00 feet; thence south 00"54'51" west 170.00 feet; thence south .80°05'09" east 83.83 feet; thence south 35'22'32" west 157.67 feet to the true point of beginning. Section Two is approximately 18 acres in size located on the ,west side of Beach Boulevard north of Facific Coast Highway. Beginning at the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 14; thence south 89°43'00" west 111.91 feet along the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section to the true point of beginning; thence south 3"29'43" west 593.12 feet; thence south 25032'14" west 386.94 ,feet; thence south 11'44'36" east 771.48 feet, thence south 80*00100" west 82.75 feet;'. thence north 52"00'00" west 835.00 feet; thence north 33'00'00" east 300.00 feet; thence north 50.0813" west 173.58 feet; thence north 45"00'00", east 84.85 feet to point "A" (to be used as a reference for the exception portion of this description); thence nth 43°17'55" west 714.49 feet; thence due west 40.00 feet; thence south 49°45'49" west 170.29 feet;'thence north 74°38'33" west 186.82 feet; thence north 51'45'59" west 420.51 feet; thence north 0'17'36" east 59.76 feet to the north line of the south halt of the northeast quarter of said section; thence north 89'43'00" east 1,844.00 feet along said north line to the true point of beginning. Excepting therefrom the following; beginning at said Point "A", thence north 45°00'00" east 190.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 43"17'55" west 550.00 feet; thence (north 89°43'00" east 640.00 feet; thence south 3°29'43" west 254.03 feet; thence south 25'32'14" west 303.23 feet; thence north 43°17'55" west 170.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Regul tuns• The regulations of the Downtown Specific Flan will serve as overlays for those portions of Districts Seven, Eight and Nine which retain the (MH) zone, until such time that the Mobilehome District designation is removed. All areas retaining the (hi*H) -zone shall be subject to the provisions of the Mobilehome District of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. In addition, these areas are subject to ' the provisions of the Mobilehome Overlay Zones/Removal/Rezoning/Change of Use Article of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. i . --116� (0481tU) 1 , 1 • a�1 sue• a• • 21112111111111101211 gill I limmill minim 01111 oil I I Old loin will 1101111 r • Y R i a .1 •1 r • r • • • • • S•�f• .• ••f�f• HIM '�, •- �/ � •.•r•r.'�:•�� i f•Ii�ti•••��.�• r •fir'• � r , 11110111fil oil 11 19 sin vigil I sm mill 114. S� I Bills 41 120110111 o al *� * � R. � i �. ♦ i®il /�' '?7.�r� F, ;� ��.L':�r `�•�iti�eti Ila; lint a �� J 1r t!� • r • • . • • L • • s . .�r••�t•• i! i�ti• •fir�J ft �� • �'a 1 K LEGEND District II - Visitor-Serving Commercial , District ' f 2- Residential ' District #3- Visitor-Serving Commercial Distri.et #4- Mixed Use ; Office/Residential ` District $5- Mixed Use; Commercial/Office/Residential. �. District #6- mixed Use ; Commercial/0fPi cc/Res identi, District #7- Visitor=-Serving Commercial District 43- iligh Density Residential � DiaErict 19- Commercial /Recreation District 010 Pier-Related Commercial District III- Beach open Space LJ � � . 7 El El DO 0 El 0 0 El 11 El El El El _jEl 0 El El El El 0 El 0 n 0 11 El .10110000000000 El El l 01101101111110111100 t;b F1 Dr ( � 00 7 �— _.� 2 LJ 2 i U t �e,rr do�Nw y ri g© a CH c oRNEa Sd ling Specif is Flan Zoning . Dlstric� . PLANNING DIVISION i LEGENll l+ District l_- Visitor-Serving Commercial District' i2 Residential ' District {i 3 Visitor-Serving Commercial • i District 14- Residential District 45 ' Mixed Use; Commercial/office/Residential District 06- Mixed Lase; Commercial/office/Residential !District- 17- Alisitor-Serving Commercial District'18- Iligh Density Residential , ' District #9- Commercial/Recreation District $10- Pier-Related Commercial District #11-- Beach open Space 0 El0 11 E111000000000000L f t 1 9 11 E�J RIO Le • i R r INGTON sFAcH CkFOR IN Proposed specific,- Pian zoning Districts" . Ja Huntington Bosch Pfangin Commission _ � B --- P.O. OOX t!ib CALIFORNIA l2448 TO: City Council FROK Planning Commission DATE: April 14, 1988 SUBJECT: MINORITY REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED REVISIONS TO DxSTRi',L'f 5 WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAM At the March 15, 1988 Planning Commission meeting, proposed revisions tc tho r'-.'ttrtQwn Specific_ Plan, District 5 were rejected by a vote of 5 - 2. After the vote, Cos ..,:�:.;�•`Irier Higgins requested that a minority report regarding the action be prepared iderti��;;`.� : the proposed revisions that were presented at the February 23, 1989 Joint Study S .,iion with the City Council and the Planning Commission by Commissioner Higgins. The objective of the r,vfsions recommended by Commissioner Higgins is to separate commercial and residential. The following is a summary of the revisions which were presented by Commissioner Higgins: commercial would be allowed only on both sides of Main Street; the east side of Fifth Street and west side of Third Street gay if those 1I2 blocks are consolidated. The balance of District 5 would be residential Including the separate area along Lake Street. The suggested revision., are similar to the 3DII ptan which is attached. zw4t rank Higgs Planning Commissioner FH:1?LF:gbm Attachment: 1, 3DJ1 Proposed Land User }r (o36W-I) i itOf'L1.• CwIG or aA y 'Ise : � " ".« ,t\ •,�' �-�•L 1•S � A 46 Mow ,, ,,I '• l It•s+�s.�a��.tr.jI�,.•` L!� :.�.::; ".��y,ti: .,, •, - ril�� ••'�"�'j���}�.,'Sr �+5,,��,•.4 titji b �yta.f .,.,.• �'','�•��•'. • 'rapes, a set RAF.- %,�-2 2E- NQ, _67- 7/USE gE IT NO. 87-84lNEG TrVE I? CLA ATIQN ,NQ. 87-`?.Q.,.,(MIC'.I.i ELZ.E�MgRIA�1T 19BB V �� CO I SS 19 �tEE^�L�SI Ai- ICANT: KERNVIEW OIL CORPORATIAN Zone Change r 87-17 is a request to place an "01" suffix on 15 , 000 square fo portion of a 40 acre parcel of land pros tly used for oil produ 'on and agriculture. Use Permit No . -84 is a vequest to Drill one W well on the 100 foot by 150 f site . The applicant has requeste that Zone Change No . -17 , Use Permit No . 97-84 and Negative Decla tion No . 87-50 be ontinued to the April 19 . 19a8 Planning Co is ' on meeting to ilow time for the applicant to complete cartain to ical ma rs . 51AEF RECQhtMENUATION: Continue Zone Change No . 87-•17, U Perm No. 87-84 and Negative Declaration No . 87-50 to the A 1 19 , 19 Planning Commission meeting per the applicant ' s uest . A ;�OTIOH WAS :MADE BY LIV . GOOD, SECOND BY PIERC To CONTl2m ZoNc CHANGE NO. 87-17, USE ERMIT NO. 87-8.1 AND NEGATI DECLARATION NO . 87-50 TO THE APRIL 90 1988 PLAINNING CQMISSION MEE NG, BY THE OLLOWING VOTE: Ay--- S : Pi ice, Livengood, Silva, Leipzig , Ortega, Nlgg.ns , urguignon :+0E5 : None 75F.N None ABST N : None C-3 =E gUJIjLNT NQ. 8 8-3 APPLICANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Code Amendment No. 88-3 is a request for revisions to expand residential uses in Districts 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all distxict,s in oeder to create a more concise document. Districts . of the Downtown Specific Plan are in the downtown area generally located along Pacific Coast: Highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard . UM1 O�1ME;iTAL STATUS code Amendment No . 88-3 is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 19300 .4 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, 1986 . PC Minutes 3l1P./88 -3 (0.264d) DRAFT COASTAL ST3T" The Downtown Specific Plan is the implementing ordinance of the Coastal Element and the proposed revisions are consistent with the Local Coastal Program contained in the Coastal Element which Has certified by the Coastal Commission in March 19ss . BEDEMELOPMENT STATUS: The Downtown Specific Plan contains the zoning and development standards for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area which was adopted by the City Council in 1982 . The goals of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area are to provide affordable housing oppertulnities, to•� preserve historically significant buildings while eliminating blighting influences , the elimination of seismic deficiencies , and to improve and expand visitor--serving corrnercial Facilities . 1 ._$xCQI` NDAT QU : Approve Code Amendment No. 88 -3 with findings and recom.merd adoption by the City Council . THE PUEL'_'C HEAR I aG WAS OPENED Barbara Milkovich, member of the Historic Resources Hoard, spoke in support of a cultural center in either District 5 or 4 . She staked that she would like to see a museum ( i . e . a working oil well , sugar first boat used by lifeguards , surfing history, etc. ) lrcated in one of these districts . She also voiced concern regarding the historic structures in the downtown area and said that she would like to see restored property styled architecturally to reflect the history of Huntington Beach. Guy Guzzardo , 515 Walnut Avenue, member of the Historic Resources Board, stated that there is an urgent n9ed not recognized in the Downtown Specific Plan and that being the preservation of historic structures . He would like to see the Downtown Specific Plan xevised to include a requirement for Historic Hoard review before demolishing any historical sites . He was asked by one of the Commissioners how many significant historical sites there were on Main Street . I{e stated that there were perh3ps 10 to 15 sites . Douce Langevin, 8196,.'Pawtucket Drive, addressed his concerns with the closing of Fifth Street. He said that the closure would create a negative impact on residential areas (i . e. re-routing buses, traffi..c, etc. ) . He expressed concern with the elimination' 'of residential on the second story levels in the commercial areas . , He said that there was a study done 'recently that concluded that second story 'office/commercial was not successful . He . also stated a PC knute'n �- 3/1.5/8B .�4- (4254d) DRAF f� ;; M concern 'with the requirements imposed by the Ciro to downtown property owners that wished to upgrade their buildings . He said that the requircments cosh the property owners more than their properties were worth and feat that this was unfair . Loretta Wolfe , 411 6th , Street, stated her objections to the closing of, FiEth Street . She saki that major bus routes would then be diverted to her neighborhood causing chore traffic and creating a parking and safety hazard . She also stated that because of the closure she feels that the City' s historical sites will be jeapordized . Richard Harlow, 111 loth. Street , stated that he feels this phase of development is responsive to the community and market feasibility . He feels that mixed use in District 5 will strengthen the commercial on Main Street . He also stated that he feels the requirement for all on-site parking will eliminate possible shopping at more than one establishment and would like to see the requirement eliminated . i Bob .14andic, 1112 Main Street , expressed his opposition to the closing of Lake Street and stated that ho felt that street closures should not be pet-initted, especially on Fifth or Sixth Street . lie said that the circulation system is supposed to be a loop and that Sixth Street is presently too narrow. He further stated that the Downtown Specific Plan was originally based on premises that no longer exist and feels that if cor.=ercial development is reduced in the downtown area that residential should also be reduced . He suggested that a long-term financial study be initiated. James Smith , 201 12th. Street , stated that he is opposed tc, green belts being given away on Pacific Coast Highway and to on-site parking being locked up . There were no other persons present to speak for or against the code amendment and the public hearing was closed . Straw votes were taken on proposed revision) in each district of the Specific Plan. They are as .follows : p.8Oi 51 ED UNISIONS TO 5PEUM_2Lnti DESTGN, r.QtF (SEC119H 3 . 01 ( a) Change District 4 from Mixed Usiu (Office/Residential/ Commercial) to 100 percent Residential . (b) Delete the commercial anchor concept in District 6 . (c) Zmphasize cultural/:iocial node in District 5 or District 6 dependinS on scale . (d) The Historical Resources. Hoard shall provide design recommendations for structures considered to be historicPlly significant . PC Minutes - 3115/88 I �� � . . DRA� A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE 3Y "LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY BOunurGNON, TO I ACCEPT REVISIOAS ( a) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livezgood, Silva , Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon NOES : Pierce • I W i PRQPQSE+Q..REVI,S I-ON.5 TQ IMIET,02 :i3T ST NVAMS.._L TIS?NN._4.1 q) ( a ) Introduce six (6) definitions : 1. Common open space 2. Gross site area 3 . Hotel 4 . Net site area S . Private open space 6 . Suite Hotel A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA TO APPROVE THE SIX NEW DEFINITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: APES: Liva good , Silva , Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins , Bourguignon 110:75 : Pierce ;�T �1►f't v TJQN PASM P_%2MED REyJS1QJJS #rg DF.V_ngPKE-NT STAjN: PS ,.-CS.ECT.iS? j - ' `1i5TRA 19 ; (5ect_ion. L-U. ( a) Delete reference to Board of Zoning Adjustments . ( b) Require Design Review Board review prior to processing additional entitlements . (c) All new construction and establishment of uses shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit. (d) Allot Special Permits in order to comply with • State and Federal law. A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZ,G,�TO j APPROVE PROPOSED REVISIONS (a) THROUGH (�d) , BY THE FOLLOWING OTE AYES: Pierce, L• ivengood, Silvo, Leipzig , Ortega, ' Higgism, Ji Bourguignon NOES: None t STP,11W VOTE MOTION PAS PG Minute s •- 3/la/SA ►. --G- (0264d) DRAr P$Q20SED HEMI rQHS TO DEVET-92MENT SIMIARDB E .i Q?l 4,.0). - rjENER ale j (SeCticn A .2) (3) Restructure non-conforming requirements . (b) Require minimum ten ( 10) foot setback for subterranean and semi-subterranaan parking structures . (c) Delete specific setbacks from driveways and parking lots . (d) Require twenty (20) foot minimum dimension for cnmmen open. space. ( e) Parking for commercial developments shall be required to provide fifty ( 55.0) percent of total required parking spaces on-site and the balance within a reasonable walking distance of five hundred ( 500) feet . Hotels shall provide one hundred ( 100 ) percent parking on-site . ( f) Require height of subterranean and sami-subterranean parking structures to be measured from highest street elevation I (consistent with building height measurement) . (g) Change oo-site box sues for trees to match industry sines . (h) Delete references ..o section numbers in Division 9 of the Huntingtor•. Beach Ordinance Cede. ( i) Maintain view corridors at vacated streets in District 2 and District 3 between Walnut Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY L1V2.N'G0OD8 SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE REVISIONS ( a) THROUGH (i) , BY THE FCLLowrNG VOTE: F-,YES ; Pierce , Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega, Hi-i3ins NOES ; Lourguignon STRAW YQTE wi4x �A SED i ;ROP�OSEfl H . I S IONS TO =JR 97 1 ( a) Change all wording ( "may" to "shall") . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD# SECWID BY LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE REVISION (a} , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Livengood, Silva , Leipzig , Ortega, Higgins, Sourguighon NOES: Pierce PC 'Minutes 3/15/58 -7- (0264d) DRAFT bl): PROPOSED REV I S IQNS IQ Q'I STH j ,r 2 (a) Single family residential dwellings which comply with' development standards shall be approved by Design Review Board . (b) Require twenty-five (2f5) foot front setbacks along Pacific Coast Highway. (c) Allow common open space in front setback area if twenty-five ( 25) foot setbacks are maintained along Pacific Coast Highway. (d) Require landscaping to reflect landscape design of Bluff Top Park across Pacific Coast Highway. A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS M,NDE BY L IVENGOCD, SECO11D BY LE I PZ IG, TO APPROVE REVISIONS ( a) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOW:NG VOTE: AYES : Livengood , Silva , Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins NOES : Pierce, Bourguignon 51 R2p ED R "USTONS TC? DISTRICT- 3 ( a) Allow residential south of. Main Street. (b) Delete requirement that residential must be physically integrated with visitor--serving conrnorcial structures . (C) Clarify language regarding corrmercial useu in Section (d) Revise height in Section 4 . 5 . 04 regarding southeast of :Main , STreet from 12 stories to 8 stories . i A STRAW VOTE. MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVEIZGOOD, SECOND BY LE1PZIG, TO APPROVE REVISIONS (ai) THROUGH (d) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Silva, Leipzig , Ortega , Nigginsr, Bourguigoon NOES: Pierce PROPQ*ED HELVISIQRS TO 12. RICT 4 (a) Revise to 100 percent residential. (b) Delete requirement that residential must be physically . . integrated with mixed-use conmQrcial structures . PC MinutesW. 3l15:88 36 r1a DRAF7 (c) Clarify language: that single family detached. -11•rellings will comply with development standards and be sub; ,.ct to the approval of the Design Review Board . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND B11 LEIPZIG, TO APPROVE REVisrouS (a) THROUGH (c) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Livengood, Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins ;NOES : Pier ce , Silva, Bourguignon EilMW VOTE MQTXON _PASU gRUPOSEQ RFVIV. ._' Q-SLUT3IZ.5- ( a ) Prohibit residential fronting Main Street with the exception o£ the existing structures that are designated historically significant . (b) Delete requirement that residential must be physically integrated with mixed--use cormnercial structures . . � (c) Require full block consolidation to allow commercial on the street or ground level Ear development fronting Laka Street , Fifth Street and Third Street , (d) Allay freestanding residential which will probably occur along Fifth, Th; rd St:r►jets and Lake Stree;; . (e) Emphasize major cultural/social node. A STRAW VOTE MOTIQPN WAS MADE BY LEIPZIG, SECOND By 9OURGUIG:NO11, TO APPROVE- REVISIONS ( a) THROUGH (ei , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : XIES: Leipzig , Higgins, Bourguignon NOES : Pierce , :,ivengood , Ortega ABSENT : Silva TIE VQ - srRAk! VOTE, EQT1.Q pAILs A STRAW VOTE MOTIOU WAS MADE BY LEIP IG, SECOND BY HIGGINS, TO APPROVE REVISIONS (a) THROUGH (e) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: • AYES : Letpzig , Higgins , Sourguignoi; NOES : Pierce, Livengood , Silva , Ortega r MIMI _.O.TE UMJ_Q:J PAILS PC Mi.nithes 3/I5l0� ..g_ ' (025dd� , t, DR- A17 , A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVEVGOOV, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO RETAIN ORIGINAL CORCEPT Or U1 aTRICT 5 WITH NQ 3Z- USjQj1-a, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE AYES Pierce, Livengood, Silva . Orteq. , Bostrguignon NOES: Biggins , %e ! pzig SISAW MUE-MIQN DAMP PRQ. _ SED HE IS; 14 T9 2i<STF,i1Q'1' 6 (a) Jelete commercial anchor concept and emphasize minor cultural/social node . (b) Clarify maximum height in Section 4 . 8 . 04 to identify actual height in feet . A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY UVENGOOD, S£'CaNI) BY HIGGTUS , O APPROVE REVISIONS 1a) AND ( b) , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Lilfengard, Silva , Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins NOES : PiAr e, Bourquignon RRO 0- R :%IS19115- TENT 7 (a) ,allow Professional Office (maximum 50 percent of total floor avea) . (b) Delete Mobile Home overlay. Q S L '0 rj 11ZL91r.�ZS (a) Delete Corridor `Dedication. A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE HY UVENGOOD, SECOND BY LEIPZIG, TO . APPROVE REVISIONS ( a) ,. AWD fib) AND DENY Rr:VX;�TaN PR0POSF'':`'-1Y PROPERTf OWNER, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood , Silva, Leipzig, Ortega , Bourguignon NOES : Pierce ABSTAIN: Higgins �'i'SM VOIE, M=IQN PASSED (O2i PC Miniitas �4d) • D R- F _F r.BQe.=p RCSIQt1s �Q_�rSTRICT e (a) Require master plan for each sub-area , (b) Delete requirement fo . Master Plan for entire district . ( a ) Revise maximum building height from fifty ( 50) feet to one hundred and fifty ( 150) feet or delete height limit altogether . ' ( b) Delete Corridor Dedication. A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVE14GOOD, SECOND BY ORTEGA, TO APPROVE REVISIONS (a) AND (b) AND DE."rL REVISIONS PROPOSED BY PROPERTY Ot:NER , BY THE FOLLOWING VOT% : 1 AY :S : Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , Bourguignon ANOES : Pierce j ABSTAIN: Higgins ?R Rc'Vj5I.4j15. SO RISTICT 2 .- RUM 12ML. 115-TRIEM-11 ;lone A STRAW VOTE MOTION WAS ;MADE BY LIV .NGO06, SECOND BY SILVA. TO Cn:;NGE AlL WORDING ' O " SHALT," ) IN EACH DISTRICT, BY THE :'OLLo:4I�;G VOTE: „YES : Pierce , Livengood , Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins, Bourguigr.on 'NOES : bone A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY SILVA, TO APPROVE CODE AMENDMENT No. 88-3 , WITH REVISIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Livengood, Silva , Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins NOES : Pierce, Bourguignon ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None PC, Mtnutes - 3/15/8$ (0264d) RA i T 1 I - F A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND 'AY SILV'A, TO AGENDIZE AS A DISCUSSION ITEM AT THE APRIL 5 , 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING THE FINAL VERSION OF THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE CITE' COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Pierce , Livengood , Silva , Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins , Bourguignon NOE,.: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Commissioner Biggins requested that a minority opinion be inserted for the vecord concerning District 5 . He felt that retaining the original concept of mixed use with coninercial on ground floor and office/residential above reElected a difference in opinion than his in the development of the area . :Conditi 4 CO��.91 T►SZNaI. USE PERM11 *,IQ. -88-2 riJ LOx% UNCTIQj3..._W.,,L'CH SS?NDTTION�►L E; EZT_",N I� E) 1:0. 88-6 APPLICANT: GENE N. HILL Qal Use Permit No, 88-9 is a request to mend the master site pla approved by Conditicnal Use Permit t 82-3 which designated of �1 of 'Tract 11473 for common questvian uses to permit coast •coon of a single family ci:r , ing on the lot When the Q-Rl-(2 . 7) -8 , 000 zoning was place -*on the property in 1981. prior to subdivi ' ng , one of the coma ' ions of the "Q" was that any future project app oved for this pa el of land make provisions for equestrian uses with% the develo ent . With the subsequent opproval of Tentative act 11.1 and Conditional Use Permit No . 82-3 (Country Vie•, Estat ) xitrian • 1982, an approximately one-acre lot was set aside for common a stables as well as a common equestrian trail . Conditional Use Permi No . 82-3 Zt so specifi4d a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet r homes withi the development , in accordance with the Estate R idential theme. ditional Exception (Variance) No . 88-6 is a r uest: to reduce the xea and setback to 10 feet . E ' ZUS The prop ed project is exempt Class 1 Section 301 and Class 5 Sectio 15305 from the provisions of the Callfoxn Environmental Qua y Act . i PC. Minutes 3/15/88 (026-4d) t , menofmA mhuntin ton beach depart t entff . TO : Planning Commission FROM: Cowinunity Development GATE: April 5, 1988 SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-3 (APPROVED MARCH 15, 1988 SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF FINAL LANGUAGE) py. City of Huntington f'-ach Review final language of proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan Review and accept the final language of proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan and forward to the City Council , ? G , *i �F ,N�R�� On March 15 , 1988 , the Planning Commission approved Code Amendment No . 88-3 by a vote of 5 to 2 (Pierce and Bourguignon voting no) with a provision that the Planning Commission review the final language revisions prior to transmittal to the City Council . Staff has revised the language and provisions per the Planning Commission' s direction . In addition to the revisions to Section 4 . 0 , Qg,_Pj M= Stan.darde , staff has prepared language revisions to Section 3 .0, oa. fic P�jL_f_Qncent. Frior: to City Council action, the revisions will be incorporated into a legislative dr- rt and ordinance format . This report addresses specific language revisions to Section 3 . 0 and '. Section 4 .0 . For reference, the March 15 , 1988 staff report is attached which addresses environmental , coastal and redevelop.::ent issues . 2 . 0 At!8 YM: The Planning Commission requested that a definition and select provisions be clarified . The following is a summary of the revisions to the language which occur in Section 3 . 0 , ,fpeci fir PIA 11 ogsign CQncept , and Section 4 . 0.. j2ey loFent.,_U1Aaj_", as directed by she Planning Commission on March 15 , 1988 . The summary format for presenting the revised language for Section - 3 . 0 differs from the summary format for Section A . O . The actual revised language is provided within the summary for Section 3. 0 . In ti Section 4 . 0 , the revised :language is contained in Attachment 3 and is ` referenced by page numbers . Ilk • 7 •ve•sJC 4 I I SUMMARY OF REY I SED LANGUAGE Rh'1dISED LANGU,%GE SECTZOli 3 . 0 - SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGN CONCEPT (a� Revise language in District Six to delete commercial anchor nodii concept . Rgv g� a a 9 u a 9 e - r.-t i o n 3 . 2._.1 .-._I �L o'd_-V.� _CQ� L Res id. !Q9rmerr-ia1) erhe mired-use designation is intended to encourage maximum flexibility for the variety of uses allowed . This mixed--use designation includes two Districts (District Five and Six) totalling approximately 43 gross acres . Q St; rict Sit is intended to be a neighborhood-oriented shopping and service area with public gathering spots , open spaces and plazas . Services such an the library, post nffiCe , banks and theaters should be located here. The commercial. activities should center around the year-round residents and include grocery, pharmacy , hardware stores , etc . District Six is approximately 23 gross acres in size including numerous streets and alleys with a potential for vacation . This district is intended to provide equal opportunities for new office and residential developments in conjunction with the cormnercial activities . This District must be sensitive in design and scale of new development to the adjacent residential neighborhoods . (b) Relocate 2:1.. Ct-- EQ= from Section 3 . 2. 1 - Mixed-Use (,Office/Residential/Commercial ) to Section 3 . 2 .6 - Residential (ffigh Density) •f ' s.e s p C t isn.�3 The residential designation includes three Districts (District: Two , Four and Eight) exclusively for residential uses . pi„_trict Four is designed to be a transition zone surrounding the higher intensity commercial core and acting as a buffer for the existing residential neighborhoods . District Fo; r is divided into two sections on either side of District Five ( the Downtown core) . District Four includes a total of approximately 9 gross acres which will be devoted entirely to residential uses . The Plan anticipates that this district cwn accommodate 160 new residential units . This residential district should ensure a buffer area in terms of heights , scale and uses, between the Downtown core and the adjacent areas . Stbf f. Repor t -- 4fl5/88 •-2- (0337d) .. .,_ •n ..i.. ,. ._. t .__ ... i1._ •!,t'fa'.';aw4.4r7•h.,rxH..1..'•1';6',.l` 4.A t\F 1, ... i '1 7 iJ:.. , .. �_ __ —_— —___ - __ — — — � i REVISED WIGUAGE SECTION 4 . 0 - DEVELOPME11T STANDARDS SECTION 4 . 0. 04 - DEFINITIONS Page 50* Revise language qfor Section 4 . 0 . 0.1 - Suite hotel S ECr I O N 4 . 1 . 01 - ADMINISTRATION Page 51 Add to Section 4 . 0 . 01 : The Historical Resouresa Board shall provide design reco.wiendations for structures considered to be historically significant . SECTION 4 . 2 - GENERAL PROVISIONS i Page 54 Clarify Section 4 . 2 . 01 - Non-Conforming Uses Page 56 Clarify Section 4 . 2 . 06 (c) Se`back for subterranean parking structures . Page 58 Revise Section 4 . 2 . 13 - Parking for commercial uses Page 60 Add to Section 4 . 2 . 15 ( E ) -- Maintain view corridors at vacated streets in District . and District 3 betoanen Walnut Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. Page 62 Add Section 4 . 2 . 26 which addresses the Orange County Transit District Center . SECTION 4 . 3 - DISTRICT 1 Page 66 Delete Office from Section 4 . 3 . 01(b) and retain in 4 . 3 . 01( a) . SECTION 4 . 4 - DxSTRIC:T 2 Page 70 Clarify language regarding permitted uses in Section 4 . 4 . 01 regarding single family detached dwellings . SECTIOtl 4 . 5 -- DISTRICT 3 Page 76 Clarify lanquage regardi.nr; commercial uses in Section 4 . 3 . 01 (C) . Page 77 Revise Height in Section 4 . 5 . 04 regarding southeast� of Main Street from 12 stories to 8 stories . ; 1: *,Page numbers refer to Attachment 3 St O Report`' 4/5/80 -3- (0337d) _ SECTION 4 . 6 - DISTRICT 4 Page 81* Clarify permitted uses In Section 4 . 6 . 01 regarding single family detached dwellings . SECTION 4 .7 - DISTRICT 5 Page 87 Retain original concept of Mixed-Use with Commercial on ground floor and office/residential above in Section 4 . 7 . 01 . SECTION 4 . 8 - DISTRICT 6 Page 93 Clarify maximum height in Section 4 . 8 .04 to identify actual height in feet . II' ! I 110 REVISED '.. NGUAGE IN j SECTION 4 .9 -- DISTRICT 7 SECTION 4 . .10 - DISTRICT 8 SECTION 4 . 11 - DISTRICT 9 SECTION 4 . 12 - DISTRICT 10 SECTION 4 . 13 - DISTRICT 11 Q?age numbers refer to Attachment 3 Staff recommends that the Plrnning Carnmission approve and accept the final document purstiant to approved Code Amendment No . 88-3 as presented and forward to the City Council . A'rTTACUMM- 1 . Area map 2 . Draft Ordinance 3 . Exhibit n (Administrative Draft of revisions , Sactlon 4 . 0 of the Downtown Specific Plan) 4 . Staff report dated March 15 , 1988 SN :RLF .6kia taiff 'RePort --. 4/5/88 } 33Td) huntin ton beach de artrnent' ' of community development 8 STAf .... IE O R TO Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: March 15 , 1988 SUBJECT : CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-3 (CO21TINUED FROM MARCH 1, 1988 PLANNING C0I24ISSIO:l MEETING) {��PLICAN�: City of Huntington Beach R ,4VEST : Revision to expand residential uses in Districts 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districl.-ls in order to create a more concise document . hQ�:ATI4y: Downtown area generally located along Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard �_s O SQQQEST l} AC`,ION I Approve Cr:3e Amendment No , 88--3 with findings and recommend adoption by the City Council . - Q !QrENERAL I Nr,.Q jjQN: j I On March 1, 1988 , the Planning Commission continued Code Amendment No . 88-3 by a vote of 7 to 0 to a special study session on March 8, � 1988 . The Planning Corurniscion requesL.ed that members of the City Council be present so they could be involved with the discussion regarding the propose3 revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. On March 0 , 1988 , staff received direction from both the City Council and the Planning Commission regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan . The following is a summary of the direction given to staff : (a) Allow residential south of Main Street in District 3 . (b) Delete requirement that residential must be physically integrated With visitor-serving commercial structures in District 3 . (c) Ch3nge District 4 from Mixed Use (Office/Residential/ Commercial.) to 100 percent Residential . (d) Prohibit residential fronting Main Street in District S. A•?w 43C (e) Delete the commercial anchor concept in District 6 . ( f ) Emphasize cultural/social. node in District 5 or District 6 depending on scale . In addition to the direction given at the March 8 , 1988 special study session, staff has addressed concerns that have been identified at the prior Planning Commission meetings and study sessions (February 17 , 1988 planning Commission meeting , February 23 , 1988 Special Study Session and March 1 , 198E Planning Corrraission meeting) . I.1._4,.E VV I RMEXTAL 3-TAM: Code. hrendment No . 88-3 is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 19300 . 4 from the previsions of the California Environmental Quality Act , 1986 . In addition , Section 1 . 2 , 52PQ fic PlayPror_edurpg, in the Downtown Specific Plan requires that any amendment constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and the State' s Envixonment-al Impact Report guidelines . The proposed revisions have been evaluated by an initial study which has been included as an attachment to this report. The proposed zoning code modifications constitute a lessening of intensity to the Downtown Specific Plan, thus modifications are covered by the Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report No . 82-2 which was certified by the City Council on July 18 , 1983 (see attached rnitial Study) . a . o Cc2AMU�TATUS The Downtown Specific Plan is the implementing ordinance of the Coastal Elerront and the proposed revisions are consistent with the Local Coastal Program contained in the Coastal Element which Was certified by the Coastal Commission in March 1985 . Pursuant to Section 989 . 5 . 0 of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code, a Coastal Development Permit is not necessary with this application. Coastal Commission certification, of the proposed revisions is required after Council adoption . 'rhe Coastal Element identifies coastal policies regarding visitor-serving commercial and residential opportunities . The proposed revisions will a) 1ow greater residential development opportunities in selected areas within the Downtown Core Area while still. retaining ample visitor-serving commmercial opportunities , The Coastal Act also requires the provision of low and moderate income housing opportunities within. the Coastal Zone. By increasing affordable housing opportunities, the proposed revisions in the Downtown Specific Plan ate consistent with the Coastal Act . Staff . RAC rL 3`151'!18 (02Q2d� y 5.. 0 REDEVEL MENT STATUS The Downtown Specific Plan contains the zoning and development standards for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area which was adopted by the City Council in 1982 . The goals of the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area are to provide affordable housing opportunities , to preserve historically significant buildings while eliminating blighting influences, the elimination of seismic deficiencies , and to improve and expand visitor-serving commercial facilities . 6 . 0 5 P.ECIEIS : The proposed revisions are contained within the established boundaries and districts of the Downtown Specific Plan . Section 3 . 0 of the Downtown Specific Plan provides the language which describes the specific plan. concept . According to Section 3 . 0 , the design concept emphasizes the ocean, ocean activities , the City Pier as the primary focus of the Downtown Area . Within the design concept , encouraging inland pedestrian movement. along Main Street will. provide support for proposed commercial uses along the. Main Street Corridor . Encouraging inland movement can he accomplished by providing a cultural/social node near the intersection and or a parking structure near the intersection of Main Street and Orange Avenue . 7 .,0 SU'5121 I H COMMITTEE: Not applicable . a - 0 _J S.OE AND ANALY.S M staff is proposing revisions in the Downtown Spec:ilic Plan in order to clarify and update language and also to expand residential uses in the Do.tntowri Core Area . The basis for the revisions stems frormi direction on specific projects by the City Council and discussions with prospective builders regarding the realistic market demand . Also, staff recognizes input from the general public regarding shifting the emphasis from a strong commercial corn area to a seaside village concept . The intensities of the Downtown Core Area are intended to be � compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods as well as providing an adequate erononeir base for the City. The proposed revisions are consistent with the original design concept for the Downtown Area . A change in District 9 from Mixed-Use to 100 Percent Residential will protect the adjacent , established neighborhoods from commercial impacts . Staff feels this will provide better land use compatibility. By prohibiting residential along Main Street in District S , a commercial sector will link the Main/Pier area with the northern boundary of District a . This represents a shift of the northevn Staff Report terminus of the N:ain Street Corridor from District 6 to District 5. This shift will allow the reduction of commercial floor area but still provide opportunities for neighborhood goods and services for a household popula'Zion . In District 3,, by deleting the requirement that residential floor area must be physically integrated into visitor-servinglmixed-usH commercial projects , staff envisions greater opportunities for increasing a perennial population and flexibility in development design. Permitting residential south of Main Street represents les^erring the perceived intensity of the existing provisions containzd in the Downtown Specific Plan. The revision to allow greater resident_zI opportunities in District 3 is based on the idea that more residential floor area is needed fur year-around support for proposed commercial floor area . fStaff has proposed revisions which include : ( 1) Clarification of terminology and language ; (2) rmposing setbacks ; (3) Planning Commission approval of all new construction ; (4) Changing District 4 from Mixed-Use to 100 Percent Residential; l (5) Prohibiting residential along plain Street in District 5; (6) Allowing residential south of Main Street in district 3 . Although the revisions will create a more precise document and will decrease the amount of potential commercial floor area in District 4 , only two revisions are necessary to allow forward progress of the proposed Redevelopment Project ( Phase I) at the northeast cocner of ruin Street and Pacific Coast highway . Allowing residential south of Main Street- and deleting the requirement that residential must be physically integrated with a visitor-serving conmercial structure in District 3 are required for Phase I to conform to the Downtown Specific Plan. These revisions are consistent with the Coastal Element and will be considered by the Coastal Commission to be a minor change. If necessary, the balance of the revisions can be postponed to a later date as part of a larger overall code amendment . j 2 . 0 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Code Amendment No . 88-3 and recommend adoption by the City Council. ��Da,�1GS FQF3 APPP,Q.�dl{ 1 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No . 88-3 are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, Coastal Element and Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area . . rt ails♦ae a v 262d) Staff. Redo 2 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No . 88-3 will create a more concise document and will better address ricent concerns regarding implementation of development entitlements in the downtown area . 3 . Changing District 4 from mixed-use visitor serving commercial to all residential as proposed in Code Amendment Ho. 88-3 will provide greater opportunities for increasing a perennial population in the downtown area . -1 Allowance for freestanding residential in Districts 3 , 5 and 5 as proposed in Code Amendment No . 88-3 will permit greater flexibility in design of projects in the downtosn area . 5 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No. 88-3 Will be compatible with adjacent residential development . 10 . 9 _ALA RNAT P. AC.:TL4N: The Planning Commission may wish to focus Code Amendment No . 88--3 on t?,a revisions to allow residential south of Main Stzest and deleting the requirement that residential must be physically integrated with a visitor-serving corrinercial structure in District 3 in order to allow forward progress of the Phase I Redevelopment Project and request the balance of the revisions to be included in a .future rode f amendment . ? Area rnap 2 . Summary of Revisions to Sections and Districts 3 . Matrix of Development Scenarios 4 . Draft Ordinance 5 . Exhibit A (Administrative Draft of actual revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan) 5 , Maps depicting adopted and proposed land use concepts 7 . Letter from Huntington Reach Company dated February 4 , 1988 S . Environmental Initial Study I }{S :RLF: kla I &�a£f Report 3�15�g8 -5- toao d} i t `l Ajoo tia. " � JJ �N�— 0 1 , JT— •• •. •1 i1 nw�.�� of 'M It qo 1, " f��� �J�•/� �A`ti�,�ia11/i • .•l ~ .. " I L M 1 {.�t ry �—� �•�. 'tG �i,� � ,�/���` ( ool ' ``� 7 '� r-� i.'t'A _.•..� .:7F� ."y�'4 ..iJl ;�`i',•'•w�� {w �f / f� r (_ :: . . 10, .Y � � • �(C , •fit � 1 .7_ 1 + + • r •. ''� •.�. �-��� �• "�\ ♦•�..� a�y.+e t � 1 ti'L-� .• �• t'��aA�'.�,M•Q ITT, ,�• f••.•.•w� f� i � � � ~' ��'� O ••�..w mar.�r0 � ' 1 ' Y•. �o I .rrr..rww++rs a. • r M UL 1,4 ol � Ill,�•7lh�lC�M{K71 Ht!!t1*IG,tUt� Ir UACH lt.�NkING DIVISION • . .._ ... - ...w,..r.,a.•.rw.•1..1•.na.w...ar far•..+•r+t IM»r •.......1w.IwcM..,. ''�+.wwrw.r�ro«a,.+�*•......rv.w•�+ar'.''r" , r 11AIRIA ILA ot,>v oA s9t,tait4 m." AtrltrAIM KVtt0Iv%Wr ItSi Wr+�/TUst L7t1S'It�G EXISfIMG r�1L�.IC�1G :1:F�rYS1L",4'iN1 t!'9tfiV.?i0►eS SPECIFIC cmio►"1111 0INTID" Ti1S E.I.I. 00WTONt S.F. 3211 1t1rt.E7 OCINNIM IESIAIING lug 1wour.4 IttaCW.)4 Iw IIt11LOW CJ]K:r1 • !tXit S.F. CZACM • ►" PAT" 1 011YUCT ni0-IVA Its. list 1Sa3 1V46 IOU STWI Stsir(w t(1rt~t/Gill t 1S.= If 60.3w If 5: rut �1 ►tut - .. ttSicntT:�: - r:.3.Av� tr) - 1�0 „unit► (2t.307 tr! - - i� CO►t-tRCiAI. 2 10.O+J+! if 10.0m if - 0,11)1tt tS two IMCIVIIAt 1W units 341 will i.t?3 volts 1.000 ,AAltl SGO un4tt 6% ..A1t1 6w knits C +(tCIAt 3 81.YA of SI.ISA if 0,40.311 1f w. tl 2ti1,-Xo it 15'I,Dm it I&A.VA If oil?EL - - - KO r*t trx rot (JFO.too 10i it) 410,329 of 10.0m tt 3a,0co of t4.mc if Its,Otvrstt 3s 4A1t1 21 units SSA wits 4w —fit :W units 4W vat to 40 w►1tt OV01 "P. CtA. - :y).DN I - - - CV1+42CIAL J - ITl.lSd 1f 93,OW sl 11.`00 et - - arrlCE 3:.X0 1f . ttSiCE►ITIAL W %Rltt Sa vAltt 3s1 v"It1 100 urttt IW uAtts Im "Its TW unlit � i I W.CG0 if 1;10,016 1/ 1W.,y)4 If 171.0m sf 2Q4.�d '1r 157.0tr0 Ir CfFRE 11S.Wo tl 1S,3J.*J if 113,3 s if M.,Da0 if I30.:YA It 44,OM to 4a.000 Is 1ESICIN1.AL Sl ve4ts W :•.4 .t G40 6-0ltt :CO unItl VA'I ..mitt ISI „nitt. 14 v:ltt i ;4'rt'trZ:Al 1f A;,uCO t! Sa1,�G It 1),7,Q?a tf S3.0m 1f Wwo tf tt3.= of Crt):l �.,a��c tt Aa. :o tr _ Js.xr•, 1f MCAA 1f 40,XG 1f 32.CCo if INSW��T' NAL 10. ifs t/ 10.t?CO if - 10.X0 11, 1>r"MA t► 0.004 at sISi:Eut.AL IO unI!{ tt? upllt 13t .1eltl Alt, '10 vnitl 1AW , Its 7;3 VAItt C'rrftttll T J,SCv 11 I,+,W t: SJS.[�1 {f ;i'.{cJ 1t - Sy.Ot+O t► �:,ON tl ,'rrri:t - - - - - 1`1S.>GO ►I )Sa.:G4 1t 1Ct(l uJ f-I .9 rot aW rrs y-a •+1 A►OC �1 A�'v ml Wo If) (1.2.5m it) ON 11) (?25.4:6 st) If) S.Mg It COYVL%Itcm cit. - - - - 2so.M - MICt:1{TIJ.t 159 welts 159 wnitt t,G!1S M+1t1 t,IM uniti 9W npltt 1.trJ0 Wnits 1,Ac)0 WIts (C►t'tttiAL 9 - - :�1.^W 5.3.000 It W.Dw 11 100344 if !00,0:0 tr ►ldrtt I" tat 14L4 rot om res RCd ml IM re 1.450 tat 1,430 cot (U,W 1f! (64.80 tl) tltJ.1.^c 1r) ttia,ovO tl) (3+�.(y.7 tl) i1,2i2,0CC 1t) (t,tat,t�co tut �tStl:utrlAL � vAlst tQ owlet - - - - CC>rt!�(trtal tfi 11,003 sr 14,00"J tl - )S,tO' sr 12S,CG4 11 t!.rA.'nD tf t1,SW t1 ,U.StV1 - 1 - (incT, a,1tt4Aft ' �� C►xMKtAt 11 7,0W If 7.1t10 1r - iS,t1tO tl 7,GQn7 of 7,Wri I LOW of t[3t0:�rT1K too gall .17J Posits - - 106 4nitr rod "Ito 146 volts toga, t0r'+dRau 1C7.S0d it 2AS6,tS0 if 2,S2l.tl4 sf %T12.0% t" 711.0m t1 3}O.A,4fi4 tt tm.S,C11 tf ►Gttt 131 n•t 211 rat - 1.6m m 1.%4 it* 1,i'A tar 1'$54 m (1?J,S,tO t►1 (130,2W •r) (712.00 it) (e7*000 try (I,4:1.400 tr1 ?ESib(trlfht 4S4 unlit 6,)04 p0tt 1X4 .mitt tab vtltt J.att *Altt 3,eA WWit CfiiCE 75,4►>d 1f IS.ESrs tf 1.?i1.T12 170.003 t' U�.tYA tl ZW,POb tf .`3,.dtt0 ff +tt17 lNrtsinet 1 tensr't Mr 4�»stglw►+st rAtt °tact not rsflKt tbs . - taat+s tt1.1 1�.s1s�,.rAt fir t;Ae K'tlrlt:lr. 1:11p4i , OM ? f, .'.' 7{ :i s 5'= ; {2r�.. t,i1t fir• ;. r .:. r ,{ i _ • i ,.J,,..., i ..i, .. i i c -.. !. .tr" f V'; i';Yr• 7�7 >.... 1 . CITY OF HUNT INGTOM BEACH r` 2004 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA.92648 OFFICE of THE CITY CLERK May 19, 1988 California Coastal Commission 245 West Broadway. Suite 380 11.0. Box 1450 Lang Beach, CA 90801 California Coastal Comrrz�;slon. The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach approver! Code Amendment No. SS-3 and Ordinance No. 2942 at its intrcJuction on May 2, 193S with amendments. The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2942 on 16, 1989 which reflect the revisions contained In Code Amendment No. 88-3. Ordinance No. 2942 w0l become effective on June 15. 1988. This is a final decision based on the analysis and findings as outlined in the Re que:it for Caux cil Action dared May 16. MS. If you have nny questions regarding this matter. phease contact ou: of f ice at 536-5227 or the Planning Division at 536-5271 . Sincerely, i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk A?,fW:cb i Enclosures: I 1. Request for Council Action .tali report dated May 16, 1988. I 2. Certified Ordinance No. 2942. xc: Paul Cook, City Administrator Dovg La Beile, Director of Community Development Mixe Adams, Director of Planning Roger %sates, Planning Commissioner (0633d) tA� ' REQUE FOR CITY COMO!- ACTION Date ,.any_ 16 1 gag Subrnitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator- = s Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Director, Community, pme� v Subject: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 8 8--3 �{ f � Consistent with Council Policy? ( yes I 1 Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recorn mends tion, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: . ' ,e / ETATEMEM..- OF 1SSUF Transmitted for your consideration is an amended version of Code Amendment No. 88-3 - Revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan . At the Ma,, 2 , 1888 City Council meeting Code Amendment No . 88-3 was approved by a vote o4 7 to a . Shift was directed to clarify select provisions of the proposed ordinance for the second reading . i Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the second reading for Code Amendment No . 88-3 with the revised language contained in the amended ordinance as prepared by t:he City Attorney based on the following findings : FLUMVJC,,'S FOR AMOVAL: 1 . Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No . 88-3 are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, Coastal Element and Main-Pior Redevelopment Project Area. 2., Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No . 88-3 will create a more concise document and will better address recant =acerns regarding implementation of development entitlements ,Ln the downtown area . 3 . Changing District 4 from mixed-use visitor-serving commercial to one-hundred ( 100) percent: residential as proposed in Cade Amendment, No. 88-3 will provide greater opportunities for increasing a pareanial population in the downtown ;area . 4 . Allowance for freestanding residential in Districts 3 and b as proposal in Code Amendment No. 88-3 will permit. greater f leot'ibi l ty in design of projects in the down:;own area . rtrro BMW 5. Revisions proposed in Code Amendment No. '88--3 Will be compatible %vith adjacent residential development. 6 . The deletion of the Mobitehome District from District 7 is consistent with the findings required by California �S,�Vf2roIlelft . Cgd�t, Section 66427 .4 and Findings required by Section 9270. 04 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . �,NhI,YSIS: During the discussion at the Moy 21 1988 City Council meeting regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan, staff was directed to clarify a number of provisions throughout the document . Staff has rtsviewed and revised the language as directed by the City Council . The following is a summary of the revisions which have been incorporated into a revised ordinance . i i SECTION 3.., N QW&M Section 3 . 2. 4 Delete (High Density) ��TroN •� . Q — �F��F CN'r 5TAMQj1 Section 4 . 2 . 41 (d) Clarify non-conforming uses i Section 2 . 2 . 13 (b) Include Planning Commission language for commercial parking requ::ements and include District 6 as directed by the City Council Section 4 . 2 . 13 (d) Revise to original language as adopted in October 1903 Section 4 . 2 . 15(f) Add language to maintain horizon view Corridors in District 10 Section 4 . 4 .01 Clarify language regarding single family detached dwellings Section 4 .4 . 06 Add reference to public right-of-way Section 4 . 6 Modify language regarding District 4 � c Clarify language regarding single family detached dwellings a Section 4 . 6 . 03 Delete references to full block. and 35 units per gross acre Section 4 . 10 .41 identify each subarea within District' g Section 4 : 12 .01 Revise shall to may are► - 5116/88 2.. I fi Notjapplicable . 2. Area: map 2. Amended ordinance 3 . RCA 'dated May 2, 1988 AH: PC. DNL RLF. 1.la I I RCA - '5/16/88 --3 A552i�y oeff c7 • � , rw 1 �� .. • C`.R t•,r...�ar .. ol NL Mir IT, 1 • L ; � vI 'r t cr+• �, � r NN•fPZ . � Z L s M•rf/w• ,,� f es ep 1� ti •�• „r • . I •a.r a•al•Mtw� 1 w.aw RUNT NOTON MACH PLANNIW.9 DIVIVON � -- —--- , av �1TY ©� i�Ul�Tlthl T�lrl.. �� 40 --ey � COUNCIL ADMINISTRATORrn tc�ytri� COMMUNICATION �fP � Nw�rrrr u�� I� Ve To From 1��h'►''� Honorable ?Mayor and Paul Cook Members of the City Council City Administrator Subject .: 1 DISCUSSION ITEMS REGARDING Date April 27, 1988 CODE A Y.NDMENT NO. 88--3: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN The following is a list of major discussion Items by the Planning Commission regarding the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. The major topics of discussion were: i 1. Commercial Parking Standards 2. Resldentlal Development Standards In District 4 3. Concept Revision to District 5 4. Location of Cultural Center In District 5 and/or District 6 These items were discussed at great length by the Planning Commission and staff during the numerous meetings that occured during the procecsing of the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan and warrant further discussion by the City Council. EANALYSIS: 1. �QnmargialEark'ra•g st,_andar On April 19, 1988, the planning Commission reviewed and approved final language for Section 4.2.13(b) which pertains to commercial parking standards. The Planning Commission required that proposed development In Districts 1, 2. 4, 71 81 9, 1.0 and 11 provide one-hundred (100) percent of the parking requirements on-site and that all devOopcnent projects shall comply with City--wide parking, standards for off-street parking. The Planning Commission approval of this section completes the Planning Commission review. 2. Residesuhal Develoomeat;.�tandands II3_D_istdctA i The Planning Commission approved the proposed revision of changing District 4 from mixed use cam merclaUresldential to one-hundred (100) percent residential. Upon closer analysis of land use trends and compatib111ty, staff proposes to alter the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff proposes prohlbiting single family detached dwellings In District 4a ~along 6th Street). Staff feels that multi-famiiy, whether it be co;Oominiusmx ar . apartmem, mould better serve future commercial development and be more compatible with the mi.•(ed use commercial activities In District 5. i 3. nceut by. Ion to D strict S Mt the Feburary 23, 1988 Joint Study Session with the City Council and Planning Commission, Commissioner Higgins discussed a concept revision for District 5. At the March 1S, 1988 Planning Commission meeting, the proposal revisions to District 5 as presented by Commissioner Higgins were rejected by the Planning Commission by a vote of 5 - 2. After the vote, Commissioner Biggins requested that a minority report be prepared and forwarded to the City Council. (Attachment 2). 4. ration of Cultural_ Center In 1215trict nd&r District 6 During the discussion regarding the location of the Cultural Arts Center, two districts were identified as possible locations. The Planning Commission recommended that a minor Cultural Arts Center be located in District 6, north of Orange Avenue, which would be linked to the existing Public Library In architecture and ftmetion. The Planning Commission recommended that a major Cultural Arts Center be located south of Orange Avenue In District 5. RECOMMEN12A1LQ Staff recommends that the City Council: A. Replace the language in Section 4.2.13(b) with the following: Proposed commercial development projects within Districts 1, 2. 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 1 provide one-hundred 100 percent of the required uired parking on-�sity. 11 steal ( ) �1 F k P n B. Replace the language in Section 4.6.01 with the following: P Per-nittedUses. The following residential uses shall be permitted in District #`d.: raulti-family housing, apartments, condominiums 2�.d stock cooperatives subject j to app.-oval of a Conditional Use Permit: Exception: a. Single family detached dwellings are only permitted in District 4b. b. Single Family Detached Dwellings which comply with the development standards In District 4 shall be subject to the approval of the Design Re,,/lew, 1. Map of Specific Plan Zoning Districts 2. Minority Report regarding Commissioner Higgin's concept revision for District 5. PEC:R Lh:gh,M xcs Douglas N. La Belle; Deputy City Administrator � . 7�..2_ (CS i . District` 1 Visitor-Serving Commercial District 12-- Residential District- #3 Visitor-Serving Commercial District `1Q- Mixed Use; Office/Residential District #5- Mixed use; Commercial/Office/ttesidenti.il District #6- Mixed Use; Commercial/Office/Residential District d?- Visitor-Serving Commercial District 48 Isigh Density Residential District 19 Commercial/Recreation District /14- Pior-Related Commercial District ill- beach Open Space a � - � N . o 00[][]' _]IIEIEIa0000010i DOD so le El 0ee s6 WC 9 2 _j f Hj 1 3 MW GER am two ...,.- nowZ1 .......I..� ���........a �� I Speck Ptah Zoning Districts �f ; ' ,PiA��tTE WG DIVISI�?N FIGURE 4 . 0 i Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. OOX 100 CALIFORNIA 02648 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: April 14, 1988 SUBJECT: MINORITY REPORT REGARDING PROPOSED REVISIONS TO DISTRIC i 5 WrTHIN THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN At the March 15, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan, District 5 were rejected by a vote of 5 — 2. After the vote, Commissioner Higgins requested that a minority report regarding the action be prepared identifying the proposed revisions that were presented at the February 23, 1988 Joint Study Session with the City Council and the Planning Commission. by Commissioner fiir gins. The objective of the. revisions recommended b Commissioner Higgins is to se 4ra:e T j y gs P commercial and residential. The following is a summary of the revisions which were presented by Commissioner Higgins: commercial would be allowed only on both sides of Main Street; the east side of Fifth Street and west side of Third Street QnLy if those I/2 bi.A;ks are consolidated. The balance of District 5 would be residential including the separate area along Lake Street. The suggested revisions are similar to the 'Mil plan which is attached. ractk Higgin / ___ i Planning Commissioner i I=H:RLF:gbm Attachment: 1. 3D/I Proposed Land Uses l C03055r1•-2y ' STXUGTUR�� l�'ftRf:lNi• � •�•% fir'. ,i �• •��� �> > '7 •; •w �. �•v' ram' / � �+ �. ' ��•�T'�}�` � ,• ��,, ' , Y CIVIO IM IL on 46. goo K • .fir r i' ��!, '.L C: ~�'+.�, •�• •t ♦.,.••�! ',.�,A•f+� ,,,,�� 71 sc S • i , Propoc-ed Land, ...''. li': V a1ai] REQUE6 ► FOR CITY COUNCI ACTION -, Data v 7 l 98 d ' . 1 s LA Submi"ed to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Director of Community Develcp to Subject: CODE AMENDMENT NO. 53--3 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( } Now Policy cr Exception M Statement of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT Transmitted for your consideration Is Code Amendment No. 88-3 ishtch rerlects proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan. The revisions expand residential uses in Ui_strict 3 and 4, clarify language, add rninor provisions and add six new definitions. In aid-dltion to the approved revisions, Commissioner 111ggiru requested a minority report raegar60g revisions to District 5 which were not accepted by the Planning Commission. REMN t NPAI N: The Planning Commission and staff recomme7d that fire City Council approve and adopt j Code Amendment No. 88-3 as prepared by the City Attorney's office. Planning Commission action on March 15, 1988: ON MOTION BY LCVENGOOD AND SECOND BY SILVA, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-3 SUBJECT TO REVIE%V OF FINAL LANGUAGE AT THE APRIL 5, 198S ?'LANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, SILVA, LEIPZIG, ORTEGA, HIGGINS NOES: PIERCE, BOURGUIGN014 - ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: DONE Planning Commission action on April 5, 1988: ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY ORTEGA, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THE FINAL LANGUAGE FOR CODE AMENDMENT NO. 88-3 j EXCEPT FOR SECTION 4,2.13(b) COMMERCIAL PARKING STANDARDS WHICH MLL BE REVIMED AT THE APRIL 19, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AND RECOMMENDED ADOPTION BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENCMD, SILVA, LEIPZIG. ORTEGA. HIGGINS, BOURGUIGNON NOES: PIERCE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: HONE 't No�1se yyy AlV"AL�'S15; Code MiendmPnt No, 88-3 is a request Yo revise the Downtown Specific, Plan which etas zdoptu.ee 1n October 1983 r-nd certified by the Coastal Commission. Ort March 21, 1998, the City Council, acting a,t the Redevelopment A.gen-,Y, directed staff to make the nec-OjOry changes to the Downtown Specific Plan to permit residential uses on the ground level within District 3 ainng Paciflc coast Highway, youth Main c:reet. The directed changes were approved by' the Planning Commission on March U, 1988 subject to review of filYal language on April S, 1988. In edditien to the directed changes w the Downtown Specl'ic Man, other revisions have been approved by the Planning Commission as recommended by staff. The revisions proposed by staff include adding six (6) new definitions, minor revisions to General 'Provisions, change District 4 from mixed-use commercial to 100 percent residential AN rlaf jflcation of ianguag� throughout Section 4.0, neYgloument ��tds. These revisions re�ect staff's desire to clarify and improve the document in order to better the general publin and bullee'rs who inquire about permitted uses and development sfandards. The following b a summary of revisions which the Planning Commisrlu, approved on April S, 1988. All proposed changes occur to ;iection 3.0, and Sect. forl 4301 which will be forwarded to the Cc. i,rsl •.ornmisslon for certification. : ISM RY O MISOLLANSi1LA0; SECTION 3.3 W- SPECIFIC PUN DESIGN CONCEPT Page 18', Relocate District Four, Section 3.2.1 - Mixed-Use 190 23 (Office/Residential/Commercial) to District to Section 3.2.4 - Residential (HIEh Derulty). Page 19, 20 Delete commercial anchor node concept from District 5. SECTION 4.0- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Page 49 at' 19IL �4,Q4^.. f[t1IY19I]S Add new definition for common open space, gross site area, private open space. Page SO Add new definition for Suite hotel. 5ec69a 4•1 - Admit3#itatim Page 51 Clarify language and add language regarding Design Review Board and Historical Resources 0cai-i. Page 52 Acid language vegardinh spcGial permit for compliance with State and Federal Law. Page 53 r;arify language. page: numbers refer to Attachment 3 RCA -- 4/02/88 »2- (0413d) Psge 540 Clarify larkpiage and re-structure r1cin-conformingusEs and sac%sctures language. Page 56 Add langua�ge requiring five (5) foot depth for front setback area V) Alai` . . 1t r palm trees,' Clarify 13tiguage. ' Page 58 Add additionO commercial parking guidelines. Page 59 Delete language regzr ping parking area setbacks. Page 60 Add language raquiraments in response to indrstry standards. I - Page 61, Clarify language. 62 & 63 Section -- iald-.t 1; Visitor—Sere g.C'Dinmerci 3 Page: 65 Rettrucouire permitted uses. Page 66 Require ground levr:l be visitor-serving r,.ommercial'rises. I Page 67 Clarify language. S��s�iicrn �•�—�'.i�.irtr���.:.B�i�ls�.�l Page 70 Add language that,single`family detached dwellings which't;omply wjth development standards shall be a0proved by Design 'Review, Board. Clarify front setback language. Page 71 Uarify language. Page 72 Clarify common open space provisions. Sgulon 4.5 --'DlN&rjCj.3: __Yijissir::.S ryjOj:. MMCrQW Rage y4 Rest pe s. •Allow'residentlal sou Restructure rinitted,use th of 1►lain street. 75 do 76 Allow residential on ground level. Reduce height from VNelve (12) 0 eight (8) stories for area southwest of Main Street. Page 90 Add language to revise District 4 from mlxe&usc'to all residential:) Page a Delete mixed use language. page .numbers refer to Attachment 3 RCAw d/0Z'$$ #.. Q41 d). skcd n =» strict S• "h x i- se• m i i OffjssJ 41��� `gym ts� � Page 85, 86' Restivcture permitted.uses. Page 87 Clarify lariguagA. 4. �t14n_La -- MixedCo�i�uOrfiCe!_8t�ensigt J` Page 90 Delete'commercial anchor'node' language. ?age 93 Delete requirement that residential must he physically integrated with commercial structures. soon 1.9 Muriel 2 Y1x).1c1:=&.rv113g Cornmeical Page 98 Delete mobilehome overlay. i 5eclIgn4.10- DistrSct_5 L)gnslty Residential Page 100 Require master conceptual plan for each subarea rather than the entire dish ict. Section 4.11 -_]23sirict 9: Carn_mscinl/BsS�.faIL4D Page 101 Clarify language. Section 4.12 Uis.ricE.,L I: P1cr-wi3elated CommimW Page 1041 Clar:ry language. Page 107 Clarify language. • page numbers refer to Attachment 3 In`addition to the a roved re`k ,ns t µ , AP .,' o the. .... ;: Downtown Specifl�: Plan, Commissioner �. '. 1-[lgginsrequ6it6d that a rrOnarlty report:be incl6diii in the report, to'the City Council (see Attachment;7). The M141Jgr,`6bjective of the revisions to District 5 which the minorliy:: ` report supports is separating commer cial and residential land uses. Commissioner Higgins feels that requiiing residential above commercial floor area is a mistzke. Rased on'this. + Coininissloner Higgins did not support the Planning Commission's action to reject any changes:to'District S. As lni'' ti n Aprll'S, 198v, the fi n l language'for'Section 4,2.13(b) seated in the ar, on o Ct,tnmerclal Parking Standards will be re iewc►d o April 19, 1988. T he final outcome of r the"discussion will be presented to the City Cow diming staff presentation. , Code Amendment No. 89--3 lit catepricalty exenaptt pirsuant to Sectlon 19300.4 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,,1996. The proposed zoning, code ; rnadtflcatlons comstitut e a les tening df,intensity to the Downtown Specific Plan. The modMeations are cover ed by the' '0awntown Specific Plan Enviranmentai impact Report No,-82-2 which was certified by the City Council on July 19, 1943. A KCA .., A10zli3g -�-� (0415d) j� 00 MMA � i.'.' ' " } ,,:.�1� .(+✓:a :n ,,f:: C..;l;iel ,,,,.; f�l{, Pursuant to Section 989.5. Huntington Beach Urdtiiance'Cede;a ' �stal . ..- 0'of the D op rmi�;i` not necessary,wfth this appllcatforraCc�astal CorrmLssion eve] went-Pe p> ;•..:.. ,, ... P certification of the' sod 0isions isr aired alter Council a" rion. ;.The'Downtown S Gific.Plan is ahe implementing ordinance of;the Coastal Elrmept arKi the`propaaad r. a ,.. .r,: .. , revisions are consistent with the 1:oral Coa stal Program,container! In the Coastal Element identifies coastal pt�ticies , 'a din serving March I98S. a". Coaatal;-Elernen: ,+_ , ' Coastal Cnmrnissian,in Ma nimercial"and residential- w c was'cerc a by.the c ,.. . oppo rtunities In rtunities. =The proposed revisions,will allow greater residential development selected'areas within the Downtown Core Area. The Coastal Act also req es'i46 provision of low and moderate income housing op,,,'3or`tunitiea within the Coastal Zone. By,increasing affordable housing opportuniltles, the proposed revisions In the Downtown Specific Plan are consistent with the Coastal Act. r andards for. . Main-Pier.Redevelopment Project Area which was ndo ted b the C the The Downtown Specific Plan contains the zoning act'' development st PP y City Council�in 1982. The goals of the Main--Pier Redevelopment Project Area are to provide afrcrdible housing opporMnitles; to'preserve historically significant buildings awhile eliminating blighting in,uEnces, the elimination of seismic deficiencies, and to imprWie and expand visitor-serving commercial facilities. SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTER CTT N: The City Council may modify Code Ameanduient No. 88-1 as desired. 1. Area Map 2. M�itrix of Development Scenario, 3. A,dcninistrative Draft 4. Ordinance , 5. Maps depicting adopted and proposed Land Uses b. Maps depicting existing and proposed Specific Plan Zoning Districts 7.$. MinutesMinority omort March 15 19$$ Planning Commission meeting in 9. Plant ing Commission Staff Report dated April 5, 1988 l)1.H:it.LF:gbrn RCA -. 4102189 _S (0415d) Lt t # pllgl•1C`NO, fi1811CINOTICI MIC NOME MM M0710E ' CODE AMENpMEN., H4. (ROVIllons to the,Db*nfown dice Piro . ►,,, Splhc�Itr Dl�trf+�tts`30 r�'��:, ► „' , . at the l�unU' ,.� , , ,. +•; , : ,•., NOTICE '. ,-, '::' .,, '; 1r _ a •t • ., ; . .yeti N 5 HEREBY GIVEN tts nq on Boach City Corm t wtt!two r pub1a i»iri�ig kj ilea Card �,tid ,Chsm r,at the Huntington Booth Civic,Conleir,`2000,Mein treet'Huntin IQtk MOO;Ceti{ MIA,an tfi y` ';.and 'o i4o'time Indicated Wow W'reoelye and casrlder the statfflofi tts o�aA pwsoz&who wlah to,be teintive to'the application described below. t"•4' GATE:Monday,'tAE%y, 2, lase , (JJJ TIME: 7.00 PM SUBJECT:Cade Amendment No.$8-3 t j APPLICANT:City of Hunttnflta+t t:6cti � . , .• �t.�, It i , .• , +` f t . LOCATION:Rohmtown Brea generally located along Pacific Coast Niphway between t3otdenweer{:ltreet and Beach Boulevard(sae attached map) : • ZONE. Downtown Speg ific.Pia - PROPOSAL, Revision to ax abd residontlal us a In districts 3 end 4 Sn the Downto*n S Oc Pten " 'minor revisions In all districts which will creati a morn course docurnw. ENl/1RONMENTAL STATUS:Covered by Environmental Imp. , Report No 82 2. COASTAL STATUS: Purauent to Soction 969.5.0 a Coastal OviWopf"ni Pormft is not nemuwy wt•n ihfs '1 appiication.'CowAtil Commission wIll rmriew the proposed char res. ON FILE.Acopyof tM proposed request Is on file In tau Npar(mtent of Communt3•yClevafop►»Mt,�Natn '� 1 Street,"Hunikigton Beach,Calltorrift 9264e,_tor Inspe�rcn by'iittia A'puw;c,. -copy of thti :tuft roForl; avallablo to Interacted parties at City Hail or the Male C1 t.lbro3y;7 i t 17att'�rt Avenue. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are im►lled to attend"d Nea►1119 and a pfess oplalons c sl, (wi t+rtde+uo for:•� ' or against+the application as oullinod above. It thwe &to,ary bother griostiona abm ru1i Robeet f:ra ikttn, Assistant Plsnner at 536.527 t rt tare Office of the City C10h. 534.5405, ' HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, By:Alicto N. Wentworth.City CI rk,Phone (74)53F-640d. '~ Pubti hed,Orange Coast Os'ty Pilot April 21,Ms. 1 ' , ...........r.`.. ��...,....�'`'Zvi •'L..4�.A,1 •- J...�e.I 11.rJ,4+.r�r..r�.r.,/v...w►.+.�./ ,1 ' ^4�1�/� ,����. .,f,• �,�� j .fir:.. , �,;; (y.•.." ........!...........- 11 � � Jr t�► CI• 01 Ell Ell + ►r • r /� j j�-�fit`•i(�'f7� ,�/, J t. of T' h e' jo ' � wry, i•+:"" `,r, .: `"'""' ' ,`+ ✓' J`" ' ' `. s 1; { OW 4 �d�'Yw . `t;•4,�1".�23"�tR"lr1S(:�'+iC"'hl"•t't'.�`T,'lt�YtY.n3..�'a7 �+..rrM+ "'iuh►r,Wl! , �.wir..�r +s►'d.ut+rAi+iAKi�..�tp��r`� it'cYRiY:�l7ddl ,y ��}",. �C Authorized to Puthin Adv0111samtar1ts of su kindsinciudwuigq pubkC nolices by f3etreo of thee,superior Court 91.4►anQe"CaurRy, California. Number A•6214, dated 29 5eolem"r, 1961, Md A-2e83 dated 11 Jum. 1963 STATE or CALIFORNIA County Cif'Orange t :.e.c.'.a.«*w i:..«o$wool" to ON .ram to PCs Co%~elm I am a Citizen of'the Unitad States and a resident of the tiount aforesaid; t am over thr age of ei ht ,. Y 9 9 �n years. and party in the bela+vOty not a sit to or interested entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange , Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the MEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation. t printed and published in the City of Costs Mesa. County of Orange. Stale of California, and that a Notice of Pu lir. Hearing of whir.h copy attached hereto is a true and Comolete copy. was printed and Fu• bushed in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach. Huntington,Beach. Fountain Valley, irvirls. the South Coast com munities and Laguna Beach Issues of said newspaper for o n e consecutive weeks to wit the issuets) of April 21 198 8 1lJi3 ,., 198 198 198__-.. , 1 declare. under penally of perjury, 'that the foregoing is true and correct_ Exec'Ute' d on _ ARr 11 2 1 , 198 .at Costa Mesa, California, � , . Signitfure f PROOF OF PUNOCATION Publ i A h',, '41,.1/as NOTICE OF PUBt � f� ME ME 5 8d-3 26isions' o the Dornrn Soecl,g#c Plan hold publ'i c h�eari n i n ,,the Counat ahe Nuntin tone - NOTICE;IS,-HEREBYGIVEN ' th g Beach .Ci.ty Council .will g. ci 1 Chamber at the: Hun ti ngton ,Beach. C1 v i c, Cen e�r, I* Main Street, Huntington Beach' Chlifornia,' on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the stateme'ts' of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described' below. �: Manday, May 2. 1988 '7:00 F.H. MEC�': Code Amendment No. 88•-3 City of Huntington Beach Downtown area generally located along Pacific Coast Highway between F Street and Beach Boulevard (see attached map) . 72g• Plan Downtown Specific . a enti al uses . i n .0 i p,RQl.. Revision to expand resid ,,. istrltts 3 and a in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts which will create a more concise document A ENYIROMMEMI.1�l� STAT11�. Covered by Environ;�ental Impact Report No. 8►. 2 451A STA Pursuant to Section 989.5.0 a Co� � � Tt�: astai Dev6lopa�ent'. Permit is not `necessary wf th this application. The Cal i forn4 a Coas tai Coti�mi ss i Qr vi l i review the proposed changes ( FIL A copy of 'the'. proppsed request' is on file71n the Departme,'�t of Community; Development, 2OW Main Street, Huntington Beach ; Y California. 92648, for inspection by the public.. , A copy of the staff report wf i l' be available to interested 'parties at City Hall or the Mal'n City Library, 7111 Tai lbeet Avenue. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend-said {id hearing and Qp t�ions or submit, evIdence for ,or against the appti cat I0n as outlined above. If there are , any questions, please call Robert Franklin, Associate Planner at 536--52,1 or the Office of the City Clerk, 536-5405 HUNTINGT'ON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicla 14. Wentworth City Clerk Fhore (714) $36-5405 Dated 4/19l.88 , 1 r •J • r` le � lr4p�f r • � � Downfown "O' f P a n Speci ic =mod *• Imo,` _ �' 1 • I � �! NOTICE OF PUBLIC ' AR NG CODE AMfiDMENT, NO. 80- 3 (Revisions to the . Downtown Specific Plan, specifically Districts 3�f 4 , ;,u*dr*. loe jo NOTICE IS HEREBT GIVEN, that the Huntington Beach -P4$nn-in fzz 0n will, hold. a �'public hearing in the -Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington 'Beach, California, on the; date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the ' statements. of all persons who wish to be' heard relative to the application -described below. Thin-i-t -wae--eAnt-isued_.£to�-th®��arch--- _ 1988 Planning Commi W meek .p..g.:.._ DATE/TIME: Tueed�a}�, March-15, 1988 , 7: 00 PM APPLICA119.11 NOBER: Code Amendment No . B8-3 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach i�Q TION: Downtown area generally located along Pacific , Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard (see attached map) . Downtown Specific Plan BEQUEST: Revision to expand residential uses in Districts 3 '� 4,t 4-40 '6p in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts Which will create a more concise document . b 1 IRQNtq UTAi, STATDS . Cowered by Environmental Impact Report No . 82-2 . CQ&STAL 5TA .: Pursuant to Sec:ion 989 . 5 0 a Coastal , Develor/ment Permit is not necessary with this applicition . '-r r• ---- Coastal Cocnnission will review the proposed changes . 02 FILE: A :copy of the proposed iequest .is on file in thro Department of Communiky, Development, 2000 : Main street , ` Huntington Beach, Calitornia 92648, For- inspection by the public: . A copy of the staff report will be Pvailable to - interested parties at City Hall or.-he Mair3 City, Library (7111 Talbert Avenue),, aEllre4* � .►. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. ' lease call Robert Frrsnklin, .A If there are any further questions s�s�i`sant Planner at 536-52?1. ' c �'•.;t.{ � •C �ts►s�.'°�-� ,�• Mike, Adams s Nuntington` Beach Planning Commission e Publ i.,h /2!/88 lReyisfansAo the Damtw hedflc Plan SQeci�ically Di saricts 3 41 l�l NOTICE;,IS, HEREBY GIVEN that thee° Hunt I ngton Beach-City' Counci t ►ri 11 hold.,'publ c::hearing . in :the'Counci 1. Chamber at the Huntington Beach's Civi c Center, '200d Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the datii and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all-'persons, wha wish to be heard relitive to the application described below. %U: Monday, May 2, 1988 i , 7:00 P.M. SUO : Code Amendment No. 88-3 ; APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach N: Downtewn area generally located along Pacific Coast Highway between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard type ittached map) ' p$QP�I L1 : Revision to e.kpand residential uses its 01 stri cts 3 and 4 ,in the Downtown Specific P1an' and minor revisions in all districts which will create a more concise document, (y ROl1MENTA[�..STA 5: Covered by Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report 'No. 82-2, Pursuant to Section 989.5:4 a Coastai�Per not � necessary with this application. The California Coastal Commission will review the proposed changes MIME: A rronun tf 0hvetoomentd Ze000est Nains on StreetleHuntinIn , theton 8rtnent of Co i y e p.. _ . 'g P each, Ca s, 92648, for inspection by the public.. A copy of the staff . report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Librairy, 7111 Talbert Avenue. ALL INTERESTED' PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence 'for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any questions ,. please call Robert Franklin. Associate Planner at 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk, 536-5405 HllNTINGTON . BEACH CITY COUNCIL N� V'`by By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 4/19/88 . y CA 926+180031 SW'Elmid, i 6 , �luntinc,�ton Huh, CA`9a6�{ , � _ '{ '.•w. .. .tom._. tL,,.� .a•�• C/0'[�l� i� � 7r G37 P'rankfart `Ati+c�i�ie '.. 19820 "edacti Blvd. huiitiro#on ftm ,''CA 92648 1jLxtirgtact' � 'C1k 92648 AM: t rests ynCitas ,, Calif M;Coastal d6viki.rsi.an;1 t?rt6ga �- Sauth Coast District, r ,Lin Haven' Driv+a I- itii t6n ee rh', cx 92648 245 W. Broadfay; '9u .te 38(a 1")9 Etch, CA 90801 HB%FV Board of Mm.ltors , r6ug Lnqev Ao 8101 Slater Avenue 8196 P.awtucket .Drive Huntington ne-i- h, m 92647 Fawtingt017 '+�Ch, CA 92646- ' NrM: Judith Se-vexy ,• Golden.State Mobil&=ae I i :.•lail(lt:�: F.asterl ,. Owner S Zzagu..,- •: � .'. 2`03 , 8th Street 11021 Magnolia Blvd. c:ntingtcn M�ach, CA 92648 Gardr-m Cavve, CA 92642 AMN: Virginia Day gorge. Dry Building �u;try A:=.'-OX. s Suri f,C�L'l 1 21•� Street- �1 E. ,ath srst�et �•�o ceo � 200 Santa hw r Ch :unti.ng'ton Beach, CA 92648 i rxw Ito n Mwrc4mt'S Assw.iaticn .'C/O tiat:alie RotschBob Munclid . I1112 Mmin', Stitet • r Pies, Realty Inc. Huntington DEach, CA 92F48 Yr 220` Main Stunt Fhintngttron Beach, CA 92648 , 2213 .l"n Street E*itttingtod 11ex+5, CA 92648 ATTN: Kim Barone - 1 So. `C.A. A&oc, Cov I is, 600•S. Carcrianowealth Avai : .: ;si.te 100 I�Og �geles, CA' 90005 ' A'PLN.• Richard Spicer lk)ntir*cn Beach Co, 2110 4W n street , IW.iragton Death, CA 92648-2499 r �. RM: R.J. firatkZ. 9.4 f�In l Hwt1 T7 nKx*rvw , - Hur►tc i -A, 92645 S Publ i s /21 he DNENT 88-3 Lfty1iQns 'to the Dk'!'1Imm sped fIr. ?I oil f i rt11 bf ttri'crts 3 �4) A :.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN.. hat the Huntington Beach t:i,ty -Cour;cii wilt hold -public hearing i n°-.the',Caunc i l Chamber at the'u"ki ngton Beach` Civi c-` Center`, 20O0 Main Street;, Hunts ngton; Beach. Cal i fornl a, on the date and at the r + 1me � fndicat' d below,.to roc Ave and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DEE Monday, May 2, 1988 7:00 P.M. BM': Code Amendment No. 88--3 APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach TIoli: Downtown area generally located along Pacific Coast Nighrray between Goldenwest Street and Beach Boulevard '(see' attached map) . Downtown Specific Plan MOW Revision to expand residantial uses in Districts 3 and A _in the Downtown Specific Plan and minor revisions in all districts which will create a more concise document ENYiRZMENTAI STATUS: Covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 82-2 L WASTAL STdW: Pursuant ta •Section 969.5.0 a Coastal Development Permit Is not necessary wi tb thI s'`'appl i'cation. The California Coastal` Commission wl11 review the proposed changes QSIU : A copy of the proposed ��egoest i s on f i i e n the Department of Co unit ty. Development, . 20QU Maln Street,,, Huntington Beach:,- California, 92648, , for inspecticn 'by the public. A copy of the staff,,report will-be available to interested parties at City Wall or the Main City Library, 7111 Talbert Avenue. ALL INTERESTE(YPERSONS are iovited' to attend: said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there 1 are any- questions, please call Robert Franklin, Assoc ate Planner at 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk, 536-5405 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CCUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 4/19/8f3 Ass" w • � 1 f OD • ,•'��- ,,tom• �`- � ,-� -�-\ 00, JLW f � • 01, iffr . if f ,a .._., r � f IS e • I \ • Downtowne Ift C' • I Plan . J %5 ec 6 f 1 i �