Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing - Specific Plan No 11 - McDonnell Centre Busi s - Fa.20�►,.,, Cow.�, /4a Council/Agency Meeting Held: In/6 197 Deferred/Continued to: U'Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerki Signature 97-69 Council Meeting Date: October 6, 1997 apartment ID Number: CD97-53 3 3-7a J o/a p/9 7 Qce D A..;� `7Za . 3 7a -D ► CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS x SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Adminis or =- PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Directorl�� 1-/Lo , 97-(o q - i9 nc 337a SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 96-1/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-6 (McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11) Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachm t(s Statement of Issue: Transmitted for City Council consideration is a request by McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6, which are proposed to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11, and certification of Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 96-1. The Specific Plan will establish the zoning designation and includes development standards for the 307 acre McDonnell Douglas site. Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION Motion to: A. "Certify Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements with a Statement of Overriding Considerations by adoption of Resolution No. 9 7-6 q (Attachment No. 6);" B. "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 as amended with findings (Attachment No. 1) by adopting Ordinance No. —1.3 7Z (Attachment No. 9)" REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Planning Commission Action on September 9, 1997: A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO RECOMMEND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 96-1 WITH RECOMMENDED REVISIONS AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CEQA REQUIREMENTS WITH A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 1528, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Chapman, Inglee, Kerins, Biddle, Tillotson, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Speaker ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-6 WITH RECOMMENDED REVISIONS AND WITH FINDINGS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Inglee, Chapman, Kerins, Biddle, Tillotson, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Speaker ABSTAIN: None PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Zoning Text and Map Amendments be processed to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan (Specific Plan #11). The objectives of the specific plan are to prevent further piecemeal development of the area and to facilitate development of a cohesive mix of industrial and commercial uses with a distinguishable character for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area. The Specific Plan accomplishes this by establishing a planning concept, design theme, development regulations and administrative procedures necessary to achieve an orderly and compatible development of the project area. The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist. Subsequent development plans, parcel maps, and other entitlement requests for the project area which are consistent with both the Specific Plan and City of Huntington Beach General Plan shall be pre-entitled and subject to site plan review and approval by the Community Development Director. The intent is to establish a public-private partnership to CD97-53.DOC -2- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 enable the development of a high quality business park without impacting the City's circulation and infrastructure system. Planning Commission Recommended Revisions At the September 9, 1997 Planning Commission Hearing, revisions to the Specific Plan, EIR, and Statement of Overriding Considerations were requested by the Commission. The following summarizes the recommended changes and legislative draft sheets for the Specific Plan and EIR are provided as Attachment Nos. 4 and 5. 1) SPECIFIC PLAN • Formal definitions of minor modification, major modification, and deviations be added to Sections 3.0 and 6.2 of the Specific Plan and deviations be changed from twenty percent (20%) to ten percent (10%). • The text on page 17, Section 3.7 be changed to read, "The Director of Community Development shall impose any applicable mitigation measures," • The text on page 67, Section 5.3.8 be changed to read, "Where cars overhang the curbs, ground cover planting shall be required, a maximum overhang of two (2) feet shall be permitted." • Formal definition of Trip Generation Budget be added to Section 6.2 of the Specific Plan. • A footnote be added to page 90, Exhibit 51 that would prohibit Restaurant and Hotel uses within Planning Area 2, south of Skylab Road. • The text on page 93, Section 6.3.4 be changed to indicate that shared parking is only allowing in Planning Area 5. 2) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT • Expand Mitigation Measure 8 in the Traffic section of the EIR to allow for Planning Commission review of the updated Traffic Impact Analysis, prior to approval by the Community Development Director and Public Works Director. • Replace Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 in the Public Services and Utilities, Fire section of the EIR with the mitigation proposed in the September 9, 1997 memo from Duane Olson. • Revise page 170 of the EIR, per the September 3, 1997 memo from Jim Moore. Staff concurs with all above identified revisions to the Specific Plan and EIR. The revision to page 90 of the Specific Plan and added language to Mitigation 8 in the Traffic section were made in response to concerns raised by Sharp Electronics. CD97-53.DOC -3- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 3) STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Commissioner Livengood requested staff provide new wording per Item 6 of the Overriding Considerations. Commissioner Livengood wanted to ensure that traffic impact fees paid by the applicant would mitigate their fair share traffic impacts (as identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis of the EIR) in the immediate project area. In an effort to provide the Commission with appropriate language, staff proposed Item 6 be reworded as follows, "The project will pay required Traffic Impact Fees to the City of Huntington Beach, which exceed the project's fair share contribution for Level 1 - 3 traffic improvements outlined in Tables M and N of the EIR and required by mitigation to be placed on the City's CIP." Commissioner Livengood requested modifying staffs proposed rewording to indicate that the fees paid would be "set aside" to be utilized for improvements in the Specific Plan area. This further modification cannot be supported by staff, since it would set a precedence of tailoring funds from a City-wide ordinance to the immediate project area. Because the modification proposed by Commissioner Livengood would result in a conflict with the City's Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance, staff supports the original wording of Item 6 (see Attachment No. 6). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan The proposed Specific Plan creates a master development Ian for the 307 acre site. The p p p p p Specific Plan includes five dominant components to implement these project goals: • Development Concept/Land Use Plan • Circulation Plan • Public Facilities Plan • Design/Architectural Guidelines • Development Regulations Each of the components is described in greater detail below, except for the Development Regulations" which are summarized under the "Zoning Compliance" section of this report. 1) DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT/LAND USE PLAN: The specific plan divides the 307-acre project site into six (6) Planning Areas. The purpose of identifying individual Planning Areas is to create distinct subareas of potential future uses and to allow for private development to occur in a timely manner with an overall Master Plan Concept. The following is a brief description of each Planning Area: CD97-53.DOC -4- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 I MCDONNELL DOUGLAS EIR 96-1 III ,"u City of Huntington Beach \\U � � 11 p 11 �rI`O - ro o Df II \/% '�a 4.ar t�•r /es far - 5 <:..:�>;3»yfw.'<,3.�s..0.3>;.i .'9.:. :,f•;ia,''.aG3.'.,..:cR..,:h 0"."F,C.>.<'�'.`NRp'.> // - Plannin - / o-so. r .x.'>y;star„" >`�r�s •xs.,..r.:: ;.:a,..>.Rs.., .:o<va> ...��::. , .,,kk<. ¢sit'?` �:;xa:;cyg?• +Ls, ;:s'�;' ,.3:»sy. :s:'v. � �<PE. •4.HY. r.��' "�i��oY:}.1.fi+< .:+b:' :k':? ::.e,<,£:'ffs•'s< «,>'A..x�'`s;r.,'.azR :r:.;a:� .rk:., r�: S ,a N .....:......:.:..:. ,,cc �: dr ':.:zr.. ::3:m>!�'�r':%� .as•:;�. .'�rss: r;..;.k.'��z OD ray:. Planning Area 2 - N la P nnin Area 5 Plan s'n - m Area lA - 1, a -P annin Are 3 Bolsa Avenue © No scale Exhibit 5 EDAW, Inc. Proposed Planning Areas Source:EDAW,Inc. Planning Area 1 & 1A - includes the existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (MDA) Facility comprised of approximately 2,789,053 square feet of building area and approximately 8,000 parking spaces on 100 net acres of land. The Specific Plan contemplates the continued expansion of aerospace facilities pursuant to existing entitlements, which entitlements include expansion rights. Planning Area 1A, located directly south of Planning Area 1, is also anticipated to be developed as additional McDonnell Douglas research and development operations and/or industrial, research and design and office uses. MDA has recently informed City staff of potential plans to expand the aerospace facilities. Although no formal City applications have been filed. CD97-53.DOC -5- 09122197 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Planning Area 2 - is comprised of 58 net acres of land located along Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue to Able Lane. Portions of this planning area are currently occupied by the following uses: Sharp Electronics a 538,859 square foot administration office and warehousing/distribution facility on 23.4 net acres of land; and Cambro Manufacturing a 120,000 square foot manufacturing facility on 11.9 net acres of land (with an ultimate building area of 280,412 square feet). The remaining vacant acreage is expected to be developed with research and development facilities, office space, light industrial, warehouse and/or distribution uses. The Dynamic Cooking systems facility (Conditional Use Permit No. 96-73) has also been approved in this planning area and is currently under construction; the facility will consist of a 167,950 square foot manufacturing building on 7.5 acres. Planning Area 3 - currently vacant and west of Planning Area 2, is ultimately anticipated to be developed with office, light industrial, warehouse and distribution uses. The Airtech International facility (Conditional Use Permit No. 96-104) has been approved within this planning area but has not yet been constructed; the facility consists of a 121,500 square foot manufacturing/distribution facility on 5.5 acres. Planning Area 4 - is comprised of 35 net acres of vacant land along the northern perimeter of the project site. The property is intended to be developed as an expansion of the current McDonnell Douglas aerospace facility located in Planning Area 1 (south of Planning Area 4). Expansion of aerospace facilities into Planning Area 4 would be subject to review to ensure consistency with the design standards in the Specific Plan and compatible with the residential uses to the north. Planning Area 5 - consists of 40 acres, located at the northeast intersection of Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. Phase one development of this planning area is complete, which includes an 8-story, 235,831 square foot office building (constructed in 1989). Phase Two is anticipated to include a 12-story, 345,551 square foot office building, restaurant, and support commercial services. An application by Extended Stay America for the development of a 104 room, three-story executive suite hotel on 2.15 acres has been submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for review and approval. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Bolsa Chica Street and Skylab West. 2) CIRCULATION PLAN: The Specific Plan includes a Circulation Plan illustrating the general alignments, classifications, location and design of cross-sections for public and private streets within the Specific Plan area. The proposed circulation plan is consistent with the Huntington Beach General Plan Circulation Element. Access to the Specific Plan area is provided via a system of arterial highways including: Bolsa Chica Street; Springdale Street; Bolsa Avenue; Graham Street; and Rancho Road. A number of entry drives and public transportation facilities are also identified. The interior streets within the Specific Plan are: CD97-53.DOC -6- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Able Lane, Astronautics Drive, Graham Street, Skylab Road, and Skylab Road West. The system is designed to accommodate traffic around and within the project area resulting from ultimate buildout. Section 5.4 Transportation/ Circulation of the EIR provides a detailed impact analysis of the proposed Circulation Plan. 3) PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN: The Specific Plan includes a Public Facilities Plan which identifies existing and proposed infrastructure, storm drain, sewer, and water facility improvements to serve development within the Specific Plan area. A specific analysis of infrastructure requirements and detailed design, construction and phasing plans can be found in the Infrastructure Master Plan Appendix F of the EIR. Infrastructure impact analyses are included within the appropriate sections of the EIR. The Specific Plan identifies and requires sufficient infrastructure and public facilities to adequately and efficiently support any and all anticipated land uses and activities. These improvements will be phased to coincide with or precede individual development projects. 4) DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES: The Specific Plan includes Design/Architectural Guidelines to establish an integrated character for the development of a business park complex. The major elements of the Design/Architectural Guidelines include: site planning, architecture, streetscape, landscaping, and signing. The Specific Plan includes several policies related to these elements with which all future development proposals within the Specific Plan area shall comply. The Specific Plan also includes a Landscape Concept to establish the design character and visual qualities of the interior and perimeter of the project area. The Landscape Concept is comprised of several design elements, including: the public arterials, local and private streets, entryways, access drives, parkway areas, transitional edges and security fencing and walls to create a cohesive community landscape image. The Specific Plan includes several policies with which all individual landscape plans for future projects located within the Specific Plan area shall comply. 5) DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: The applicant is requesting a zoning text and map amendments from the existing Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay (IL-H) zoning designation to a Specific Plan (No. 11) zoning designation. Appropriate zoning modifications would be made to Sectional District Map No. 9-5-11 for the 307-acre site. The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance). CD97-53.DOC -7- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Please see Attachment No. 12 for a comparison of the Development Standards proposed within the Specific Plan project and the development standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. ANALYSIS: The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan has been prepared to achieve an orderly and compatible development of the 307 acre project area. The intent is to establish a public private partnership to enable the creation of a "Campus Park" industrial setting and to achieve high quality in individual building design. In order to accomplish this, the Specific Plan includes Design/Architectural Guidelines to establish the character and style for the development of a business park with buildings and streetscape that have a distinctive visual identity. The overall guidelines discuss architectural, landscape, and signing guidelines proposed for this area. The Specific Plan also includes development regulations and standards that will be applied to individual projects within the Specific Plan area in order to achieve and maintain this cohesive, compatible design theme. The Specific Plan also establishes the alignment and design of a circulation system, and all public facilities and infrastructure necessary to facilitate a master planned development. The Specific Plan identifies and requires sufficient infrastructure public facilities to adequately and efficiently support any and all anticipated land uses and activities. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan incorporates provisions and regulations which differ from the traditional industrial zoning standards used in the remainder of the city. The first and primary concept is to create a "sense of place" through consistent and compatible design standards. Image and aesthetic concerns will be implemented to create a common landscape theme, and reinforced with consistency in building setbacks, orientation and design. Further regulations are proposed for signing, building materials, and uses in order to assure that the variety of individual components can be assembled in an overall compatible manner. The application of the regulations on individual projects will result in a total development which will express a unique aesthetic theme. In order to provide for some design and creative incentive, deviations to the development regulations are permitted. The draft Specific Plan states that deviations up to twenty (20) percent should be allowed. However, the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that a maximum of ten (10) percent be permitted. This recommendation is acceptable to the applicant. The Specific Plan is intended to be the city's regulatory standards for this portion of the community over the next twenty years. Therefore, anticipating a need for some flexibility in the document, a method for minor modifications to the text and content has been proposed. Minor modifications should be limited to items which clarify the intent of the CD97-53.DOC -8- 09/26/97 11:03 AM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Specific Plan. These additions and deletions should relate to the overall planning issues and should not be applied to individual projects. All other modifications will be considered major and will require the processing of a Zoning Text Amendment, subject to Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. In an effort to better facilitate and expedite development within the Specific Plan area, a new method of securing individual project entitlements is being proposed. Projects which comply with the Specific Plan regulations will only be subject to a site plan review approval by the Community Development Director. If approved the project will be subject to no additional analysis or public review. All environmental, infrastructure and design concerns will have been completed as part of the Specific Plan adoption. In addition, the Director's actions are not subject to appeal, except by the applicant. The proposed process will provide McDonnell Douglas Realty Company an opportunity to market the remaining portions of the property with a distinct competitive edge over similar sites in Orange County. This upfront planning and environmental effort and approach will significantly shorten the processing time required for large scale industrial projects which benefits both the applicant and the economic base of the community. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: In June 1996, the City contracted with the firm of EDAW, Inc. to prepare EIR No. 96-1. EIR No. 96-1 was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and addresses potential environmental impacts associated with Zoning Text and Map Amendments to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The EIR serves as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and was prepared under the requisite procedure that is outlined below: June 14, 1996 Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be necessary for the project. June 14, 1996 A Notice of Preparation was distributed by the City and filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare an EIR. June 24, 1997 Notice of Completion filed with the State Clearinghouse. Draft EIR available for public review and comment for forty-five days (Comment period: June 24, 1997 to August 7, 1997) September 9, 1997 Public hearing before Planning Commission to recommend certification of EIR No. 96-1 and adoption of Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 CD97-53.DOC -9- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Environmental Impacts The EIR provides an overall analysis of potential impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. The issues discussed in the EIR are those which have been identified in the course of extensive review of all potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The EIR discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of Land Use, Aesthetics/Urban Design, Light and Glare, Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, Noise, Earth Conditions, Drainage and Hydrology, Natural Resources/Energy, Public Services and Utilities, Agriculture, and Socioeconomics. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the EIR, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. There are, however, some adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. These include both project-specific and cumulative impacts from Land Use and Air Quality and cumulative impacts from Transportation/Circulation, Noise, and Agriculture associated with the project. These effects can be lessened by mitigation measures suggested in the EIR and have been described in greater detail below: Land Use The project is consistent with the General Plan policies as demonstrated in the consistency analysis of the Specific Plan (see Attachment No. 9); however, the proposed Specific Plan will result in inconsistencies with the Air Quality Element due to the increase in local and regional emissions. The impact remains significant and unavoidable. Virtually all new projects of this size within the basin currently exceed air quality standards. Transportation/Circulation The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will impact roadways and intersections. Under buildout year 2015 condition, the proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will impact Bolsa Chica Street from Rancho Road to Bolsa Avenue and the intersections of Westminster/Bolsa Chica and Bolsa/Golden West. A cumulative unavoidable impact has been identified, since feasible improvements do not exist to bring the two intersections and roadway segment within acceptable levels of service. The traffic analysis prepared for this project was based on worst-case development assumptions for the Specific Plan and buildout of the City's General Plan. Therefore, there exists the potential that year 2015 assumptions may have been overly conservative. The proposed mitigation measures have been required to monitor trips resulting from actual entitled development. CD97-53.DOC -10- 09/26/97 11:03 AM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Additionally, mitigation is proposed requiring that an updated Traffic Impact Analysis be prepared when 90% of the Interim (year 2000) Trip Budget is reached. The project in and of itself does not result in unavoidable traffic impacts. Air Quality The proposed project is anticipated to exceed Southern California Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) daily threshold emission during construction activities. In addition, the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. A total of six mitigation measures have been proposed to reduce short-term emissions. The proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxide (NO), and Hydrocarbon (HC). The daily exceedance of the thresholds for CO, NOX and HC is a long-term air quality impact. In addition, the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 8 within the EIR has been proposed to lessen this impact. Virtually all new projects of this size within the basin currently exceed air quality standards. Noise On a project-specific level, the development allowed under the Specific Plan in and of itself will not result in unavoidable traffic noise impacts; however, the proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in an incremental increase in traffic noise levels that currently exceed 65 CNEL. This impact would remain significant and has been categorized as unavoidable. Although the EIR identifies a significant unavoidable noise impact, the analysis is conservative in that noise projections (as identified in Table BB of the EIR) do not take into account the mitigating effects of any intervening structures, such as walls, that may affect ambient noise levels. Agriculture The proposed project in conjunction with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will contribute to the ongoing cumulative impacts to agricultural resources in the region. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. According to the State Department of Conservation, a project will have a significant effect on the environment if it will convert at least 80 acres of prime agricultural land to non- agricultural uses or impair the agricultural productivity of prime agricultural land. The proposed project will convert approximately 30 acres of important farmland (not currently in agricultural production) to urbanized uses, which is under the threshold defined by the CD97-53.DOC -11- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 Office of Land Conservation, and will not result in a significant impact to the conversion of agricultural resources. Additionally, the site has not been in agricultural use since 1994 and future agricultural uses are not anticipated. Thus, the project in and of itself does not result in unavoidable impacts to agriculture. Project Alternatives A range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project were analyzed in the EIR pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (see Section 6.0 of the EIR). The discussion of alternatives focuses on alternatives capable of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives or would be more costly. The EIR also presents mitigation measures that ensure that future project impacts will be mitigated to an insignificant level. The mitigation measures proposed in the EIR will be attached to the Specific Plan. As future projects within the Specific Plan area come forward for Site Plan review, the mitigation measures will be incorporated for each project. Statement of Overriding Considerations Where impacts cannot be mitigated to an insignificant level (see Section 8.3 of the EIR) in order for the project to be approved, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted. The proposed Statement of Overriding Considerations is Attachment No. 4. CEQA requires the decision makers to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable by the City. The specific reasons why the adverse environmental effects identified in Section 8.3 of the EIR are considered acceptable are included in the attached Statement of Overriding Considerations. A summary of the project's relationship to impacts found not to be significant, impacts mitigated to a level less than significant, unavoidable adverse impacts, and mitigation measures are included as Attachment No. 7. Prior to certification and adoption of the EIR by resolution, the City Council may amend the document. It should be noted, however, that removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures will require findings and justification. Comments on the draft EIR were received from several agencies and interested parties. Staff has responded to all comments received. The comment letters and responses have been provided in Attachment No. 7, as one of the volumes of the Final EIR. The final EIR must be certified prior to action on the project. CD97-53.DOC -12- 09/22/97 6:58 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-53 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that City Council certify Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1 and approve the Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Map Amendment No. 96-7 for the following reasons: With the proposed EIR mitigation measures, the project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, and safety to persons working or living in the area, and not detrimental to the value of property or improvements in the area. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will allow for the creation of a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will stimulate business opportunities within the City by allowing for and encouraging development consistent with the Specific Plan under an expedited entitlement process. Additionally, the Specific Plan provides for a range of employment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and industrial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening the . employee base of the community. Y The Specific Plan identifies design standards, consistent with the intent of the Urban Design Element. The Specific Plan will not significantly change the existing industrial zoning and uses of the site. Approval of the Specific Plan will not result in significant impacts to City zoning compatibility. The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications are consistent with the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. With the mitigation measures imposed, the project will not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties or residents. Alternative Action(s): The City Council may take alternative actions such as: A. Deny Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1, Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 with findings. B. Continue Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1, Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 and direct staff accordingly. CD97-53.DOC -13- 09/26/97 11:03 AM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD97-63 Attachment(s): City Clerk's • - Number No. Description 1. Findings of Approval - ZMA No. 96-1 and ZTA No. 96-6 2. Location Map 3. Current and Proposed Zoning Designations Map 4. Legislative Draft Changes to Specific Plan from 9/9/97 Planning Commission Hearing 5. Legislative Draft Changes to EIR from 9/9/97 Planning Commission Hearing 6. Resolution No. ?-6 9 (Final EIR No. 96-1) with Statement of Overriding Considerations 7. CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts 8. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated 9/9/97 9. Ordinance No. 33 (ZTA No. 96-1 and ZMA No. 96-6) with exhibits: Exhibit A-1, Legal Description Exhibit A-2, Sectional District Map 9-5-11 Exhibit B, McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan (under separate cover not attached) 10. Final EIR No. 96-1 (under separate cover - not attached) 11. Technical Appendices EIR No. 96-1 (finder separate cover - not attached) 12. Zoning Conformance Matrix 13. Miscellaneous Correspondence RCA Author: Herb Fauland, phone extension 5438. CD97-53.DOC -14- 09/26/97 11:03 AM N cal A. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-6 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1. Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 to change the zoning on a 307 acre parcel from Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay (IL-H) to McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan#11 is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will allow for the creation of a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. The specific plan provides development regulations which address issues of compatibility by providing adequate setbacks, building heights, parking, landscaping, and signing in order to provide a quality business park setting. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will stimulate business opportunities within the City by allowing for and encouraging development consistent with the Specific Plan under an expedited entitlement process. Additionally, the Specific Plan provides for a range of employment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and:industrial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening the employee base of the community. The Specific Plan also identifies design/architectural standards, consistent with the intent of the Urban Design Element. The specific plan provides design/architectural guidelines which promote high quality colors, materials, architecture and design concepts to encourage improved industrial development and carry out the goals and policies setforth in the Urban Design Element. 2. In the case of a general land use provision, the zoning map and text amendment is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. The proposed uses identified in the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11 continue to allow aerospace related uses along with general industrial land uses consistent with the General Plan along with potential commercial uses which compliment the area. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The proposed specific plan provides the standards necessary to develop a business park complex. The minimum standards of the specific plan provide standards which exceed the minimums standards identified in Section 212,Industrial Districts of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision. In addition, the continued expansion of the industrial base of the community provides jobs and an increase in property and payroll taxes. 4. The adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. A comprehensive approach in reviewing and establishing a set of development standards, design/architectural guidelines, landscape guidelines, signing standards will provide the necessary zoning provisions for a quality business park complex. Attachment-9/9/97 JqJcrA1 6) ,;✓,'emu - :;. /i �, � ads j�/ �- �%% /i. k H1,7 � 9 Nc rAn S � � ]MINOR W.&VA - Y••OPIIGWN PROJECT ADAM C-EVE'' f . 3 WA ixs ^ 1� I � Crt �'-y seurrmaao y{ ' I 7dF:9Prrm9e0 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11 HUNTINGTON BEACH EIR No. 96-1, ZTA No. 96-1, ZMA No. 96-6 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DMSI Al MUMV11-3ml ... aew's sf _ / //p� Sidi `� i i \.� W[3TYIMST[R � L-J 1 City of Westminster [� Existing Zoning I IL RL t _ !1 IL IL IL-H IL - IL IL-H I Wt3TLIMSTLR , City of Westminster ` Proposed Zoning - I Specific Plan No. 11 RL R s L tOli, ,vt r Lj,me McDonnell Centre Business Park . Specific Plan No. 11 HUWINGTON BEACH EI R No. 96-1, ZTA No. 96-1 , ZMA No. 96-6 HUMMGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION � 9 / MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK NO. 11 (EIR NO. 96-1, ZTA NO. 96-1, ZMA NO. 96-6) SPECIFIC PLAN LEGISLATIVE DRAFT MODIFICATIONS The following changes shall be made to the Specific Plan: Page 13, Section 3.0, Paragraph 3: ADD NEW SENTENCE: The Specific Plan can be amended. Page 13, Section 3.0, Paragraph 3, Sentence 3: CHANGE: Major modifications ^.,,e.,.1.,r,en will require the processing... Page 13, Section 3.0, Paragraph 3, Sentence 4: I DELETE SENTENCE Page 13, Section 3.0, (4) Bullets: DELETE BULLETS REPLACE WITH NEW PARAGRAPH: Minor modification is a simple amendment to the exhibits and/or text which are intended to clarify and not change the meaning or intent of the Specific Plan. Minor modifications shall be limited to infrastructure specifications as recommended by the City's Director of Public Works and Planning Area adjustments to coincide with specific development projects. Major modifications are amendments to the exhibits and/or text which are intended to change either the Master Plan Concept, Design Guidelines, or Development Regulations. Major modifications require a Zoning Text Amendment and action by the Planning Commission and City Council. Page 17, Section 3.7, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1: CHANGE: The Director of Community Development shall impose any applicable environmental mitigation measures... Page 17, Section 3.8, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1: CHANGE: Deviations pertain only to #em-the Development Regulations of the Specific Plan... Page 18, Section 3.8, Paragraph 2, Sentence 3: CHANGE: Deviation requests, up to ten (10) tWe -(20) percent of any single standard... IAPR0JFILE\1996\6NI1601\SPECIFICPLAN\SPREVISIONS.DOC 1 Page 18, Section 3.8, Paragraph 2, Sentence 4: CHANGE: Deviations greater than ten (10)tweRt percent must be approved... Page 67, Section 5.3.8, Paragraph 5, Sentence 1: CHANGE: Where cars overhang the curbs, ground cover planting shall be required, a maximum overhang of two (2) feet shall be permitted at-a m inirr+ m yidth Gf three (3) feet (inside dimension) rrnrrr Page 86, Section 6.2.6. ADD NEW NUMBER: 6.2.6 Deviations. An adjustment in one or more Development Regulations in order to accommodate special circumstances and/or unique architectural features. Deviations shall be limited to ten (10) percent of any single development regulation. RENUMBER FOLLOWING TASKS Page 88, Section 6.2.25: ADD NEW NUMBER: 6.2.25 Modification (Minor). An amendment to the exhibits and/or text which is intended to clarify and does not change the meaning or intent of the Specific Plan. ADD NEW NUMBER: 6.2.26 Modification (Major). An amendment to the exhibits and/or text which is intended to change either the Master Plan Concept, Design Guidelines, or Development Regulations. Major modifications require a Zoning Text Amendment and action by the Planning Commission and City Council. RENUMBER FOLLOWING TASKS Page 89, Section 6.2.41: ADD NEW NUMBER: 6.2.41 Trip Generation Budget. The established allowance for vehicular traffic capacity anticipated in the Environmental Impact Report for sixty (60) percent of the new project area build-out. RENUMBER FOLLOWING TASKS Page 90, Exhibit 51: ADD NOTE: Restaurant and Hotel uses shall not be permitted within Planning Area 2, south of Skylab Lane. IAPR0JFI1LE\1996\6N11601\SPECIFICPLAN\SPREVISIONS.DOC 2 Page 93, Section 6.3.4, Bullet 4: CHANGE: Shared parking may be permitted for combined office and commercial uses, only in Planning Area 5. I:\PROJFILE\1996\6N11601\SPECIFICPLAN\SPREVISIONS.DOC 3 i r y j . 1 MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK NO. 11 (EIR NO. 96-1, ZTA NO. 96-1, ZMA NO. 96-6) EIR LEGISLATIVE DRAFT MODIFICATIONS The following changes shall be made to the EIR: Page 5-101, Traffic Section, Mitigation Measure 8: ADD SENTENCE TO END OF MITIGATION MEASURE 8: Also, said TIA shall be presented to the Planning Commission for review prior to approval by Community Development Director and Public Works Director. Page 5-170, Police Section, Paragraph 1, Sentence 6. CHANGE: The Deliee Depa4ment is eUrrently on a hiring freeze for pekoe OffiGeFs. The Department actively recruits officers to replace others as they leave and strives to maintain its existing compliment of 224 sworn officers. Page 5-176, Fire Section, Mitigation Measures 2 and 3: DELETE: Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 under Fire: 7. Drier W issanee of b��ilydinn permits within the Speeifie Plan, the applicant L � 1 �r ^ ^ m withinsq 'I as aFe" basin tewarrfs the releeation/ en!arn eRt of the Heal station, ubieet to the approval of the I emml unity Development Department 3 Qrier to issuanee of building permits within the Speeifie Plan the applicant f hall he r �b' t to a fire a needs assessment/review bar the Fire shall ;vi}$^fir cv-u-rrc-�a -r�cca�-cc.�vw vn�cn'v-r�v�cov--a�-n�c-r-irc Depa entt deteff �ne�aet�gal ne essity efftthhee new fire statien and uvivar�-rc6c� whether applieatiens should he halter) until the fire faeility at Gsham nerd PFE)dl�etien I ano is in sonriee r�vcruvnvrrcu7-rc-r�--n-r-.���-v'rvc. ADD: Mitigation Measure 2: 2. At such time as a public safety development fee is adopted by the City of Huntington Beach, the applicant/developer of the project processed within the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall pay such fee prior to issuance of building permits. P:\1996\6N11601\SPECIFICPLAN\SPREVISIONS.DOC 4 Page 5-176, Police Section, Mitigation Measure 4: DELETE: Mitigation Measure 4 under Police: 4 Drier to issuanGe of building neF mi}r, within the Speelfle Plan, the need fer additional peliGe Fnurt be fully evaluated by the Gity of Huntington BeaE;h and the appliGant If it is feuni-! that nddi}iennl effineFs ere needed }e Genie the area, nde mustb�YY UFera «f�6hnre" basis to fill thin ADD: Mitigation Measure 4: 2. At such time as a public safety development fee is adopted by the City of Huntington Beach, the applicantideveloper of the project processed within the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall pay such fee prior to issuance of building permits. PA1996\6N11601\SPECIRCPLAN\SPPEVISIONS.DOC 5 f / \ / H O"J, •� - 1, ... 3�t . 337a RESOLUTION NO. 97-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 96-1 FOR THE PROPOSED McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY BOUNDED BY RANCHO ROAD AND THE US NAVY SPUR TRACK ON THE NORTH, SPRINGDALE STREET ON THE EAST, BOLSA AVENUE ON THE SOUTH AND BOLSA CHICA STREET ON THE WEST WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report 96-1 ("EIR 96-1") has been prepared to address the environmental effects,mitigation measures, and project alternatives associated with the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park; and The Draft EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"),the State CEQA Guidelines (the"Guidelines"), and the City's environmental procedures; and Written and oral comments on EIR 96-1 were received from the public and responsible public agencies during and after the review period; and Such comments and testimony were responded to through a Response to comments document and said document was made available in a manner prescribed by CEQA and the Guidelines; and Public Resources Code 21092.5(a)requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the Environmental Impact Report, and the Response to Comments included in the Final Environmental Impact Report satisfy this provision; and The Planning Commission reviewed all environmental documentation comprising the EIR, including all elements of the Final EIR, and has found that the EIR considers all environmental effects of the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan project, is complete and adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA and the Guidelines, and recommended its approval by the City Council; and Section 15092 of CEQA Guidelines provides that the City shall not decide to approve or carry our a project for which an EIR was prepared unless it has (a) eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the findings under Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, and (b) determined that any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be unavoidable under Section 15091 are acceptable due to overriding concerns as described in Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines; and 1 g:4:97-reso l:e ir96-1.doe RLS(unnumbered)CD 9/15/97 Section 15093(a) of the Guidelines requires the City to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project; NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That the City Council hereby finds and certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report as complete and adequate in that it addresses all environmental effects of the proposed McDonnell Douglas Business Park and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA and the Guidelines. The Final EIR will ultimately be composed of the following elements: Draft Environmental Impact Report and Technical Appendices Planning Commission and City Council staff reports Planning Commission and City Council Minutes Comments received on Draft EIR and responses to those comments Statement of Overriding Considerations All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 and with the Secretary of the Commission. 2. That the Final EIR has identified all significant environmental effects of the project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. 3. That the City Council finds that the Final EIR has described all reasonable alternatives to the project that could feasible obtain the basic objectives of the project(including the"no project" alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of project objectives and might be more costly. Further,the City Council finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR and all reasonable alternatives were considered in the review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on the project. 4. That the City further finds that the benefits gained by the City and its current and future residents by virtue of implementing the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan, override the unmitigatible effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report 96-1, as shown in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 2 g*97-reso1:eir96-1.doc RLS(unnumbered)CD 9/15/97 5. That the City Council hereby adopts Environmental Impact report No. 96-1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on this 6 day of October, 1997. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City ClerkAttorney/C-� b 19"7 r! REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: Ci A ins Director of Commumty Development 3 g*97-resol:eir96-1.doc RLS(unnumbered)CD 9/15/97 McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The California Environmental.Quality Act_(CEQA) requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether to approve the project. The project will result in environmental effects which, although mitigated to the extent feasible by the implementation of mitigation measures, will remain significant unavoidable adverse impacts as discussed in the Environmental Impact Report and Findings. The City of Huntington Beach has determined that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts of this project are acceptable when balanced against the benefits of this project. In making this determination, the factors and pubic benefits provided below were considered. 1. The proposed project provides for the development of a variety of high quality industrial, office, and commercial uses consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning designation for the site. 2. The proposed project will ensure the development of a single, cohesive business park complex by providing specific design measures that encompass landscaping, signage, setbacks, and streetscapes. 3. The proposed project will allow for an expeditious development process for those projects consistent with and located within the Specific Plan area. 4. The proposed project results in a "Master Development Concept," for the site, including Land Use, Circulation, Public Facilities,Landscape, and Phasing. 5. The proposed project ensures the provision of an adequate circulation system, utility infrastructure and public services for new development, with timing and funding of improvements being closely correlated with development phasing. 6. The project will contribute required Traffic Impact Fees to the City of Huntington Beach, which in turn will help the City complete its Circulation System. 7. The proposed project will increase employment opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach including short-term construction employment and long term employment opportunities associated with ultimate development of 4,162,959 square feet of industrial, and commercial/retail/office uses. The Specific Plan provides for a range of employment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and industrial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening the employee base of the community. P:19%6 6NBOO\OVERCONS.DOC ATTACHMENT NO. Res. No. 97-69 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at an regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of October, 1997 by the following vote: AYES: Julien, Harman, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None City Clerk and ex-offici Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California G/resol uti/resUpg/97-39 /// a3 �I'1 i � a Ift ......... ............ ;� �,� ll w r Ord.No. 3372 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th of October, 1997, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th of October, 1997, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Julien, Harman, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Green, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on • , 19 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-offlcl Clerk Connie Brockway Qi1y Clerk of the City Council of the City Depuly 01y Clerk of Huntington Beach, California G/ordinanc/ordbkpg 10/24/97 McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IM PACT REPORT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA CEQA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS SCH#96061043 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PREPARED BY: EDAW,INC. .17875 VON KARMAN AVENUE,SUITE 400 IRVINE,CA 92614 r q AUGUST 1997 ATTACHMENT NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS CEQA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT I. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 II. FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT..............................4 A. Impacts Determined to Be Insignificant .................................................................4 InitialStudy ............................................................................................................4 Environmental Impact Report ................................................................................4 B. Impacts Mitigated to a Level Less than significant.................................................6 C. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ..............................................................................31 IIl. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES .............................. ....................... ...............................42 P:\1996\6N111601\FINDING.DOC i ATTACHMENT NO. CEQA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT L BACKGROUND This document has been prepared to explain the rationale that the City of Huntington Beach has used in making particular findings of the effects created by the project. Facts to support the findings are explained for insignificant effects, effects mitigated to a level less than significant, and unavoidable significant environmental effects, in this order. This document concludes with a discussion of the alternatives considered and the rationale for rejection of the alternatives. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines)promulgated pursuant thereto provide: "No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects accompanied by a brief explanation.of the rationale for each finding." i The possible findings are: Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). The findings shall be supported by substantial evidence irf-the record. The finding shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The document is organized into three sections. This section, Background, identifies the possible findings that may be made. This section also provides a discussion of the planning and environmental review process for the project. The second section, Findings and Facts in Support of Findings for the Significant Environmental Effects of the Project, provides a summary of the impacts determined to be insignificant, the impacts mitigated to a level less than significant, and the unavoidable adverse impacts. The third section, Project Alternatives, describes the alternatives to the proposed project and provides the rationale for the rejection of the alternatives. PA1996%N1 1601WOROUGHDRFEDOC 1 ATTACHMENT NO, --- The City of Huntington Beach is considering approval of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan project. Because the proposed actions constitute a project under the Guidelines, and the project may have a significant effect on the environment, and the project is not exempt; the City has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This EIR has identified certain significant effects which may occur as a result of the project, .or on a cumulative basis in conjunction with other past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS This section provides the environmental review process for the proposed project. The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible agencies and interested groups and individuals of the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the McDonnell Centre Business Park project. The City of Huntington Beach took the following actions to solicit public input during the preparation of the Draft EIR. 1. The Initial Study was prepared on June 14, 1996 by the City of Huntington Beach. A copy of the Initial Study is included within Appendix A of the Draft EIR. 2. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was prepared June 14, 1996. A copy of the NOP is included in Appendix A of the Draft EIR. The NOP with the Initial Study was circulated for a 30-day public review period on June 14, 1996. 3. Written comments were received in response to the NOP and Initial Study. A copy of these comments is included within Appendix A of the Draft EIR. 4. A Notice of Completion (NOC) and copies of the Draft EIR were filed with the State Clearinghouse on Tuesday, June 24, 1997. The Draft EIR and NOC were distributed to agencies, groups, organizations, and individuals. A copy of the NOC and the State Clearinghouse distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648. 5. An official forty-five (45) day public review period for the Draft EIR was established by the State Clearinghouse. It began on June 24, 1997.-and officially ended on August 8, 1997. These letters are contained in this document. The City accepted public letters through August 14, 1997. 6. A Public Information Meeting was held related to the proposed project and the Draft EIR on Thursday, July 8, 1997. Verbal and written comments related to the Draft EIR were accepted at this Public Information Meeting. Notes on the verbal comments and written comments received at this meeting are contained in the Response to Comments document. 7. In accordance with City policy, public meeting notices (including an EIR availability notice) were mailed to all property owners within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project property boundary. Additionally, notices were sent to individuals who requested P:\1996%N11601\RTC\ROUGHDM.DOC 2 ATTACHMENT NO. to be notified by completing a public meeting sign-in sheet and those individuals who telephoned City Hall with a request to'be notified. Notice of the Public Information Meeting was also published in the Huntington Beach Independent newspaper on June 1997. 8. A Planning Commission Study Session was held related to the proposed project and the Draft EIR on August 12, 1997. Verbal comments related to the Draft EIR-,Were provided by the Commissioners. Responses to the verbal comments are provided in the Response to Comments document. P:%19I6k6N11601WOROUGHDR"DOC 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 d II.FINDINGS AND FACTS IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT This section provides a summary of the findings and facts in support of the findings for the environmental effects of the project. The summary is provided for impacts determined to be insignificant,impacts mitigated to a level less than significant, and unavoidable adverse impacts. A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE INSIGNIFICANT The following summary briefly describes impacts determined to be insignificant in the preparation of the Initial Study and EIR. Initial Study • An Initial Study was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach to identify the potential significance of the effects due to the proposed project. Biological Resources and Cultural Resources were determined not to be significant. Draft EIR Impacts which were determined by this Draft EIR not to be significant are listed below. Explanations for why these impacts were found not to be significant are contained within the Draft EIR in the appropriate environmental section. Land Use Compatibility No impacts related to on-site land use compatibility have been identified. No significant impacts to the adjacent land uses are anticipated. The proposed Specific Plan will not result in inconsistencies with the Land Use, Urban Design, Housing, Economic Development, Growth. Management, Circulation, Public Facilities and Public Services, Recreation and Community Services, Utilities, Environmental Resources/ Conservation, Coastal, Environmental Hazards, Noise, Housing, and Hazardous Materials Elements. ` The proposed Specific Plan in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will not result in inconsistencies with the Land Use, Urban Design, Housing, Economic Development, Growth Management, Circulation, Public Facilities and Public Services, Recreation and Community Services, Utilities, Environmental Resources/Conservation, Coastal, Environmental Hazards, Noise, and Hazardous Materials. No significant cumulative land use consistency impacts to the above stated elements are anticipated. PA1"ftN11601*"H,0ING.r0C 4 ATTACHMENT NO. Aesthetics/Urban Design No aesthetic impacts between on-site uses are anticipated with development of the proposed Specific Plan. Transportation/Circulation No significant project-specific impacts have been identified related to traffic signalization on the surrounding street system. Impacts associated with on-site circulation and pedestrian/bicycle safety are project specific issues and are therefore not impacted further by cumulative buildout. No significant cumulative 2015 buildout impacts have been identified related to traffic signalization. Cumulative impacts associated with on-site parking are project-specific and are therefore not impacted by further cumulative buildout. Earth Conditions No significant impacts are anticipated related to Hazardous Materials. Based on the information obtained regarding local geology, seismicity, liquefaction, expansive soils, and hazardous materials, buildout of the proposed conceptual plan will not result in the creation of any adverse cumulative impacts.No cumulative impacts have been identified. Public Services and Utilities Implementation of the Specific Plan project will not result in significant impacts to hospital facilities. Agriculture The proposed project is located on an area of prime farmland as identified by the State Department of Conservation. The project will result in the loss of less than 80 acres of farmland and will not result in a significant impact related to conversion of agricultural resources. Socioeconomic The proposed project in and of itself, and in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will not result in socioeconomic impacts. P:1199ftN116017MING.DOC 5 ATTACHMENT NO. B. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The following summary briefly describes impacts of the project determined in the preparation of the EIR that can be mitigated to a level less than significant upon the implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the EIR and upon implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program formulated to address the mitigation measures. Aesthetics/Urban Design Significant Effect Off-site adjacent residential land uses located north and east of the project site will experience an aesthetic change associated with ultimate development of the McDonnell Centre Business Park. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in g q ,or incorporated into, the project which P avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the project proponent for subsequent projects located within the Specific Plan area shall submit for review and approval, an Arborist report to the Director of Public Works. This report shall detail the location and quantity of mature trees which currently exist on the specific parcel. The final landscape plan shall illustrate which trees will be removed along with the quantity and location of replacement trees. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a landscape construction set for review and approval to the Public Works Department. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and shall incorporate the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan requirements. Plants that are attractive to rodents should be avoided.The landscape plan shall be approved by both Public Works and Community Development Departments. Significant Effect The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future developments will incrementally contribute to changes to the perceived aesthetic quality of the local and regional area. PA199ftN11601\FIIVDING.D0C 6 ATTACHMENT NO. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the project proponent for subsequent projects located within the Specific Plan area shall submit for review and approval, an Arborist report to the Director of Public Works. This report shall detail the location and quantity of mature trees which currently exist on the specific parcel. The final landscape plan shall illustrate which trees will be removed along with the quantity and location of replacement trees. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a landscape construction set for review and approval to the Public Works Department. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and shall incorporate the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan requirements. Plants that are attractive to rodents should be avoided.The landscape plan shall be approved by both Public Works and Community Development Departments. Light and Glare Significant Effect The project will affect on-site and nearby residents' nighttime perception of light and glare. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to the approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, all exterior lighting shall be consistent with the standards established by the Zoning Ordinance (unless otherwise addressed within the Specific Plan) to minimize on and off-site light and glare impacts. The lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. P:1199ftNI16017MING.DOC 7 ATTACHMENT NO. a 2. Prior to approval of building permits for buildings constructed within Planning Area 5, proposed lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 3. Buildings shall emphasize the. minimization 'of glare by incorporating non-reflective building materials. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Community Development Department to assure this measure is met privfto issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan. Significant Effect The project will allow for the potential development of commercial recreation and entertainment- type uses in Planning Area 5. The development of such uses, which could include movie theaters, shops, etc., may result in an increase in night-time activity related light, unlike that of the typical industrial uses. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. - 2. Prior to approval of building permits for buildings constructed within Planning Area 5, proposed lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. Significant Effect The project in conjunction with other past,present and reasonably foreseeable future projects will incrementally increase the amount of light and glare in the area. Over time, the project will contribute to a cumulative increase in the amount of light and glare in the vicinity. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. P:\1996\6N11601\PINDING.DOC 8 ATTACHMENT NO. -- 1. Prior to the approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, all exterior lighting shall be consistent with the standards established by the Zoning Ordinance (unless otherwise addressed within the Specific Plan) to minimize on and off-site light and glare impacts. The lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 2. Prior to approval of building permitsfor buildings constructed within PlamAng Area 5, proposed lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 3. Buildings shall emphasize the minimization of glare by incorporating non-reflective building materials. Individual building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Community Development Department to assure this measure is met prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan. Transportation/Circulation - Significant Effect Construction related traffic will result from the future buildout of the Specific Plan. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. L Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, each applicant shall coordinate *ith the City of Huntington Beach in developing a truck and construction vehicle routing plan.This plan shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent residences.The final plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and Community Development_Director. Significant Effect Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan project may result in significant parking impacts. Finding Finding(1)- Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. P:%1996\6NI1601TIND1NG.DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, each applicant shall coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department: ensure the following is accomplished: a. necessary review of signal warrants b. review/approval of turn ingress/egress C. review/approval of any added driveways d. parking analysis demonstrating parking supplies meet or exceed the demands The purpose of the above review is to: 1) ensure site specific impacts from individual projects are reduced to a level less than significant and 2)identify the timing of future signal installations/improvements. Significant Effect Increased activity on-site and in the vicinity of the project could expose pedestrians and bicycles to traffic hazards. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, each applicant shall coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department to ensure the following is_accomplished: a. necessary review of signal warrants b. review/approval of turn ingress/egress C. review/approval of any added driveways d. parking analysis demonstrating parking supplies meet or exceed the demands The purpose of the above review is to: 1) ensure site specific impacts from individual projects are reduced to a level less than significant and 2)identify the timing of future signal installations/improvements. P:\1996\6N11601\FII`IDING.DOC 10 ATTACHMENT N0. # r _ 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that truck access points depicted on their"Final"site plan(s),meet the City's minimum truck turning radius standards. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that standards (including ADA) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety along the perimeter sidewalks have been Significant Effect Under the Level 2 Condition, the proposed project traffic will contribute to cumulative impacts to intersections. Finding Finding1 -Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project w ( ) q rp P J loch avoid or substantiallylessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 5. The City of Huntington Beach shall collect its traffic impact fee as "interim" levels of development occurs prior to the issuance of building permits. These fees will relieve the developer of traffic mitigation obligations (as detailed for Levels 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Tables M and N of the Traffic Impact Assessment) resulting from the interim levels of development. The specific Level 1-3 improvements detailed in Tables M and N shall be added to the City's CIP and implemented in a reasonable time frame. 6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the Specific Plan, the applicant (MDRC) shall complete the intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho identified in Table M under the Level 2-Year 2000(interim without Project)condition. Significant Effect Under the Level 2 Condition, the proposed project-traffic will contribute to cumulative impacts to roadway segments. F- indina Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. P*%19%16N1160ITMING.DM 11 ATTACHMENT NO. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 5. The City of Huntington Beach shall collect its traffic impact fee as "interim" levels of development occurs prior to the issuance of building permits. These fees-mil-l-relieve the developer of traffic mitigation obligations (as detailed for Levels 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Tables M and N of the Traffic Impact Assessment) resulting from the interim levels of development. The specific Level 1-3 improvements detailed in Tables M and N shall be added to the City's CIP and implemented in a reasonable time frame. SignTicant Effect ' Under the Level 3 Condition, the proposed interim project traffic is contributing to the need for intersection improvements at Bolsa Avenue/Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue/Golden West. Findine Finding (1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 5. The City of Huntington Beach shall collect its traffic impact fee as "interim" levels of development occurs prior to the issuance of building permits. These fees will relieve the developer of traffic mitigation obligations (as detailed for Levels 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Tables M and N of the Traffic Impact Assessment) resulting from the interim levels of development. The specific Level 1-3 improvements detailed in Tables M and N shall be added to the City's CIP and implemented in a reasonable time frame. - 7. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the McDonnell Centre Specific Plan, the applicant(MDRC)shall post a bond with the City of Westminster for the Specific Plan's fair-share contribution to complete the intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho identified in Table M under the Levels 1 and 3 and Level 5 - Year 2015 (Buildout with Project) conditions. The bond shall not exceed $30,000 based on today's dollars and would be adjusted based upon the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. It would be activated at the time when the City of Westminster completes the identified intersection improvements. This mitigation would be unnecessary if the Cities of Westminster or Huntington Beach acquire intersection improvement funding through other efforts. P:\1996%N11601\0NDING.DOC 12 ATTACHMENT NO. Significant Effect Under the Level 3 Condition, the proposed interim project traffic is contributing to the need for improvements at the Westminster/Rancho-Hammon intersection. Finding Finding(1) Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. s ' 7. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the McDonnell Centre Specific Plan, the applicant(MDRC)shall post a bond with the City of Westminster for the Specific Plan's fair-share contribution to complete the intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho identified in Table M under the Levels 1 and 3 and Level 5 - Year 2015 (Buildout with Project) conditions. The bond shall not exceed $30,000 based on today's dollars and would be adjusted based upon the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. It would be activated at the time when the City of Westminster completes the identified intersection improvements. This mitigation would be unnecessary if the Cities of Westminster or Huntington Beach acquire intersection improvement funding through other efforts. Significant Effect Under the Level 4 Condition, the proposed project traffic will contribute to cumulative impacts to intersections. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or successor in interest as the interim trip.budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled)and no further development shall be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that generates 100% of trips for the interim trip budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed and approved by the PA199616N116MENDING.DOC 13 ATTACHMENT NO. --� A City. The purpose of the updated TIA is to determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Area (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the developer of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees (should the present or any other traffic impact fee program be in place) or provide for mitigation measures for development at the time of developments. 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation, the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget monitoring report to determine the status of the constructed and approved development applications (entitled) development and resulting expected trips within the McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip budget monitoring report shall be based,upon building permits issued and (entitled) development within the McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report shall include gross and usable square footages of the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the land usage, and the trip generation rates used for the land usage proposed. The trip rates used in the monitoring report shall be those rates contained in the latest Trip Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 5th edition update) or another reliable source (i.e., another traffic study) as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Significant Effect.. Under the Level 5 condition, the proposed buildout project traffic is contributing to the need for the identified improvements at Westminster/Rancho-Hammon, and Bolsa/Springdale. Finding - Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 7. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the McDonnell Centre Specific Plan, the applicant(MDRC)shall post a bond with the City of Westminster for the Specific Plan's fair-share contribution to complete the intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho identified in Table M under the Levels 1 and 3 and Level 5 - Year 2015 (Buildout with Project) conditions. The bond shall not exceed $30,000 based on today's dollars and would be adjusted based upon the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. It would be activated at the time when the City of Westminster completes the identified intersection improvements. This mitigation would be unnecessary if the Cities of Westminster or Huntington Beach acquire intersection improvement funding through other efforts. PA199ftN11601\SMWG.D0C 14. ATTACHMENT NO. r - , 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or successor in interest as the interim trip budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled) and no further development shall be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that generates 100% of trips for the interim trip budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed and approved by the City. The purpose of the updated TIA is to determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Area (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the developer of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees (should the present or any other traffic impact fee program be in place) or provide for mitigation measures for development at the time of developments. 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation, the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget monitoring report to determine the status of the constructed and approved development applications (entitled) development and resulting expected trips within the McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip budget monitoring report shall be based upon building permits issued and (entitled) development within the McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report shall include gross and usable square footages of the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the land usage, and the trip generation rates used for the land usage proposed. The trip rates used in the monitoring report shall be those rates contained in the latest Trip Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 5th edition update) or another reliable source (i.e., another traffic study) as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Significant Effect Under the Level 5 condition, the proposed buildout project traffic is contributing to the need for improvements at Bolsa Chica Street: Edinger Avenue to Heil Avenue. Finding Finding (1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant.environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or successor in interest as the interim trip budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled) and no further development shall be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that generates 100% of trips for the interim trip PAIM6N11601%MDING.DM 15 ATTACHMENT NO. ATTACHMENT 1 +�_ budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed and approved by the City. The purpose of the updated TIA is to determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Area (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the developer of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees (should the present or any other traffic impact fee program be in place) or provide-for mitigation measures for development at the time of developments. 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation,the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget monitoring report to determine the status of the constructed and approved development applications (entitled) development and resulting expected trips within the McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip budget monitoring report shall be based upon building permits issued and (entitled) development within :the McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report shall include gross and usable square footages of the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the land usage, and the trip generation rates used for the land usage proposed. The trip rates used-in the monitoring report shall be those rates contained in the latest Trip Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 5th edition update) or another reliable source (i.e., another traffic study) as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 3 Air Ouality Significant Effect The project will result in the development of industrial uses which has the potential to generate objectionable odors which could affect nearby sensitive receptors. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required.in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the*Final EIR. Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations_are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Speck Plan,the applicant shall provide proof to the City Community Development Director that the use will not emit objectionable odors or provide an air quality analysis including a quantitative assessment of odors and P:%19%%N11601WWDING.DOC 16 ATTACHMENT NO. meteorological conditions consistent with the ASTM, Standard Method D1391 or Standard Method E679-79. Project design measures or additional control technology shall be implemented to ensure that odor emissions comply with SCAQMD standards. Noise Significant Effect The proposed project has the potential to result in.significant short-term noise impacts during construction activities. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Community Development that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive receptors. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include,but not be limited to: - a. A criteria of acceptable noise levels -based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; b. Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; and C. Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: a. All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. b. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. PA1996\6N11601WMING.D0C 17 ATTACHMENT NO. �-- C. All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Significant Effect It is possible that increased traffic due to the project may cause the Rancho Road near the Navy Railroad roadway segment to experience higher CNEL values in the future which have the potential to impact nearby residential units. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding Tlfe significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 3. Commensurate with the updated TIA (refer to Mitigation Measure 8 in Section 5.4), an updated acoustical analysis shall be performed on the following two roadway segments: 1) Rancho Road near the Navy Railroad; and 2)Rancho Road between Bolsa Chica Street and Westminster Avenue to determine if potential vehicular noise will impact nearby residential units. The study will be prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engineer and include a discussion of the need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise barriers to ensure compliance with City noise standards. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Significant Effect The proposed project will increase the year 2015 traffic noise levels by up to 1.7dB. The increase in noise levels due to the project along the segment of Rancho Road between Bolsa Chica and Westminster is considered a significant impact. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 3. Commensurate with the updated TIA (refer to Mitigation Measure 8 in Section 5.4), an updated acoustical analysis shall be performed on the following two roadway segments: 1) Rancho Road near the Navy Railroad; and 2)Rancho Road between Bolsa Chica Street P:IM16N1160MMING.DOC 18 ATTACHMENT NO. and Westminster Avenue to determine if potential vehicular noise will impact nearby residential units. The study will be prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engineer and include a discussion of the need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise barriers to ensure compliance with City noise standards. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Significant Effect - The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in a short-term construction noise impact. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. i - - Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 3 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit and have approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of Community Development that will reduce or mitigate short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive receptors. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include,but not be limited to: - a. A criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type and length of exposure to construction noise levels; b. Physical reduction measures such as temporary noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; and c: Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall produce evidence acceptable to the City Engineer that: a. All grading and construction vehicles and equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. b. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be located as far as practicable from sensitive noise receptors. C. All operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. P:\1996\6N1160ITMING.DOC 19 ATTACHMENT NO. Earth Conditions Significant Effect The proposed project may result in impacts related to local geology. Finding - Finding (1)-Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, additional studies as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works, shall be performed to determine native elevations and evaluate the extent of compressibility of the soils for structural design purposes. These studies shall be reviewed and approved by all appropriate departments at the City of Huntington Beach. Significant Effect The proposed project may result in impacts related to liquefaction. Finding Finding (1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, grading plans shall demonstrate that alluvial soils shall be removed in the areas that will receive fill or foundation loading down to competent materials and recompacted. Additional studies may be deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works, to evaluate the extent of liquefaction of the soils for structural design purposes. Significant Effect The proposed project may result in impacts related to seismicity. PA1996MN11601*TMING.DOC 20 ATTACHMENT NO. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, it shall be proven to the Department of Public Works that all structures are designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Codes or Structural Engineers Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earthquake. 3. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for development parcels. All structures shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of grading permits. Significant Effect The proposed project may result in impacts related to expansive soils. Finding - Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 5. Prior to approval of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a report for approval by the Director of Public Works which assesses and provides- recommendations for the following: a. Specific measures for adequate foundation,paving and flatwork design in areas of any remaining expansive soils. b. Identify the Expansive Index onsite and specify where necessary recommen- dations included, but not limited to: 1) presaturation of soils prior to concrete placement; 2) raised floors; 3) post-tensioned slabs; 4) thicker slabs; 5) deeper PA1996\6N1160ITMING.UOC 21 ATTACHMENT NO. footings; 6) the addition of soil amendments to facilitate wetting during compaction. 6. The applicant(s) shall be responsible for remedial removal of expansive soils onsite during grading and prior to construction. Should any construction occur on expansive soils, the applicant(s) shall adhere to the recommendations identified above in Mitigation Measure 5. - _-- Drainage/Hydrology Significant Effect The proposed project may result in potential impacts related to drainage. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant_ shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include,but not be limited to: • Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 39 within the EIR)to handle increased flows. • Ensure that building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood for sites adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street between Bolsa Avenue and Rancho. Road. • Confine street flows within the street right-of-way. 2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall submit and obtain approval of final drainage and erosion control plans for each project component. These final drainage plans shall demonstrate that post-development stormwater discharge levels from the project will remain at or below existing stormwater discharge levels. The mitigation measures contained in the plan shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Huntington Beach prior to any construction activities.The plans shall include measures such as the following: • Diversion of offsite runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped areas; P:\1MbN11601MIIYDING.DOC 22 ATTACHMENT N0. �- • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases. Significant Effect The proposed project may result in potential impacts associated with flooding. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding" The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include,but not be limited to: • Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 39 within the EIR)to handle increased flows. • Ensure that building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood for sites adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street between Bolsa Avenue and Rancho Road. • Confine street flows within the street right-of-way. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall developa plan to implement ment an recommendations from the County P P Y of Orange tY g Flood Control Division and City Public Works Departments which will reduce impacts to the Bolsa Chica Channel floodplain resulting from onsite development. For example, one such recommendation would be the removal of the wooden bridge at a future time when it is no longer utilized by the County operations and maintenance staff to access the westerly bank of the Channel. This plan shall be submitted to the City Department of Public Works for review and approval. Significant Effect The proposed project may result in impacts to water quality. Finding Finding(1)- Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. P:\1996\6N116017DVDING.DOC 23 ATTACHMENT NO. �"", Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 4. Prior to issuance of any grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee to-the-State Water Resources Control Board to be covered under the State NPDES General Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of the written reply containing the discharger's identification number. 5. Prior to the issuance of the grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the EPA) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. Significant Effect The project will contribute to potential cumulative drainage, flooding, and water quality impacts. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include,but not be limited to: • Construct the necessary storm drainage improvements (identified on Exhibit 39 within the EIR)to handle increased flows. • Ensure that building pads are placed at elevations suitable to withstand 100-year flood for sites adjacent to Bolsa Chica Street between Bolsa Avenue and Rancho Road. • Confine street flows within the street right-of-way. • Confine street flows within the street right-of-way. P:U9%\6NI16MENDING.DOC 24 ATTACHMENT NO. 2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall submit and obtain,approval of find drainage and erosion control plans for each project component. These final drainage plans shall demonstrate that post-development stormwater discharge levels from the project will remain at or below existing stormwater discharge levels. The mitigation measures contained in the plan shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Huntington Beach.prior to any construction activities. The plans shall include measures such as the follo..DYE • Diversion of offsite runoff away from the construction site; • Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped areas; • Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to trap sediment; and • Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during construction phases. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall develop a plan to implement any recommendations from the County of Orange Flood Control Division and City Public Works Departments which will reduce impacts to the Bolsa Chica Channel floodplain resulting from onsite development. For example, one such recommendation would be the removal of the wooden bridge at a future time when it is no longer utilized by the County operations and maintenance staff to access the westerly bank of the Channel. This plan shall be submitted to the City Department of Public Works for review and approval. 3 4. Prior to issuance of any grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee to the State Water Resources Control Board to be covered under the State NPDES General Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of the written reply containing the discharger's identification number. - 5. Prior to the issuance of the grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enacted by the EPA) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using management practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions which are appropriate. Natural Resources Significant Effect Development of this property will result in an increase in the use of fuel,water and energy for the life of the project. Finding Finding(1)-Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. P:\1996\6NI1601\PINDING.DGC 25 ATTACHMENT NO. - Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Building design and construction shall comply with the Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Prior to approval-of building permits for the Specific Plan, architectural and engineering plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works to ensure conformance with these standards.Energy conservation features should include: • Installation of thermal insulation in walls and ceilings which meet or exceed State of California,Title 24 requirements. • Insulation of hot water pipes and duct systems. • Use of natural ventilation where possible. • Use of natural gas for space heating and cooking. • Installation of ventilation devices. • Orientation to sunlight and use of overhangs. • Landscaping with deciduous trees, to provide shade in the summer months and allow sunlight through in the winter months. i 2. Prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, it is recommended that the applicant consult with both the Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. _ Significant Effect The project in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in natural resources impacts. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental-effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. Building design and construction shall comply with the Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Prior to approval of building permits for the Specific Plan, architectural and engineering plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works to ensure conformance with these standards. Energy conservation features should include: P:\1996\bN11601\FINDING.DOC 26 ATTACHMENT NO. • Installation of thermal insulation in walls and ceilings which meet or exceed State of California,Title 24 requirements. • Insulation of hot water pipes and duct systems. • Use of natural ventilation where possible. • Use of natural gas for space heating and cooking. • Installation of ventilation devices. - — • Orientation to sunlight and use of overhangs. • Landscaping with deciduous trees, to provide shade in the summer months and allow sunlight through in the winter months. 2. Prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, it is recommended that the applicant consult with both the Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. Public Services and Utilities Significant Effect The proposed project will create;increased demand for public services and utilities on a local and regional basis. Additionally, the project in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will create an increased demand for police, community services, water, solid waste disposal,public transportation, and sewage. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Facts in Support of Finding The significant effect has been substantially lessened to a level less than significant by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. Fire 1. Prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. If during the Fire Department's plan check it becomes evident that fireground operations will become impeded, the department will impose standard fire code requirements such as automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, access roads,etc. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall contribute funding on a "fair-share" basis towards the relocation/enlargement of the Heil station, subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. P:\199 WI1601\RMING.DOC 27 ATTACHMENT NO. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall be subject to a fire facility needs assessment/review by the Fire Department to determine the actual necessity of the new fire station and whether applications should be halted until the fire facility at Graham and Production Lane is in service. Police - 4. Prior to issuance.of building permits within the Specific Plan, the need for additional police officers must be fully evaluated by the City of Huntington Beach and the applicant. If it is found that additional officers are needed to serve the area, funds must be procured to fill this position. 5. The Police Department shall be consulted during preliminary stages of the project design prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Plan to review the safety features deter mine their adequacy, and su suggest improvements. _ gg 6. During construction and at complete buildout, the project shall provide easy access into and within the project site for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well marked to facilitate response by officers. Project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. 1 7. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project shall be designed such that all areas of the project will be well lit, including alcoves, walkways, doorsteps, and parking facilities. Project site plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. - 8. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, an internal security system (e.g. security guards, alarms, access limits after hours) shall be incorporated, to be reviewed by the Police Department and the City Planning Department. Schools 9. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the state fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit applications. Community Services 10. Prior to issuance of grading permits for Planning Area 3 in the Specific Plan resulting in removal of the existing fields, the applicant shall determine if recreation facilities are needed by existing and future employees. If deemed necessary, the applicant must enter into a lease-type agreement or provision of recreation facilities for employees to replace those lost, subject to the approval of the City of Huntington Beach Community Services Department. M1996\6N11601\FINDING.DOC 28 ATTACHMENT NO. Li_Li_ brary 11. The applicant shall provide development fees to mitigate conditions of increased demand as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the City fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit applications. Water - 12. Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy,the following water conservation measures shall be implemented as required by state law: a. Ultra-low-flush toilets b. Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets C. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating systems d. Compliance with water conservation provisions of the appropriate plumbing code 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, irrigation systems which minimize water- waste shall be used to the greatest extent possible. Such measures should involve such features as the following: a. Raised planters and berming in conjunction with closely spaced low volume, low angle (221h degree) sprinkler heads. b. Drip irrigation, C. Irrigation systems controlled automatically to ensure watering during early morning or evening hours to reduce evaporation losses. d. The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and grass lands. The project applicants shall connect to the Orange County Water District's "Green Acres" system of reclaimed water should this supply of water be available. Separate irrigation services shall be installed to ease this transition. 14. Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, water pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a maximum of 60 psi shall be installed. 15. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the use of pervious paving material shall be encouraged to reduce surface-water runoff and aid in groundwater recharge and slopes and grades shall be controlled to discourage water waste through runoff. 16. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City shall provide information to prospective occupants regarding benefits of low water use landscaping and sources of additional assistance in selecting irrigation and landscaping. 17. Prior to issuance of building permits, complete landscape and irrigation plans which minimize use of lawns and utilize warm season, drought tolerant species shall be submitted to and approved by the Water Division. Mulch shall be used extensively in all landscaped areas.Mulch applied on top of soil will improve the water-holding capacity of PA1996\6NI16017MING.DGC 29 ATTACHMENT NO. the soil by reducing evaporation and soil compaction.Irrigation system shall be designed to use reclaimed water when available. 18. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the Water Division of the City's Public Works Department shall.be consulted during design and construction for further water conservation measures to review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the project--to-feduce Y rP P J peak hour water demand. 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the g p Specific Plan, the project applicant . J PP shall implement. conditions of the Public Works Department regarding water infrastructure improvements (identified on Exhibit 40 within the EIR) to handle increased water flow demands. Solid Waste Disposal 20. To reduce the proposed project's impacts on waste disposal facilities, project designs shall develop a means of reducing the amount of waste generated both during construction and when the project is in use. The waste reduction program shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan. Potential ways of reducing project waste loads include implementation of recycling programs, and use of low maintenance landscaping when possible (i.e., native vegetation instead of turf). 21. Rainbow Disposal shall be contacted during the design stage of project components to ensure the most efficient and economical means for rubbish removal. The designs shall include rubbish enclosures,projected travel areas, and turnabouts where necessary. Public Transportation 22. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, a bus turnout, if determined by the City Traffic Engineer to be necessary based on roadway cross sections, travel volumes or speeds, shall be provided at each bus stop located in the project area. 23. Prior to approval of a tentative map within the Specific Plan, the area adjacent to this turnout shall include a paved passenger waiting area complete with a bus shelter and bench. 24. Prior to approval of a tentative map within the Specific Plan, a concrete bus pad sufficient to support the weight of a bus (see OCTD's Design Guidelines for Bus Facilities) may have to be provided at the transit stop. This would be necessary assuming the material used to construct Bolsa Avenue would be insufficient to support continued transit use of the bus stop. PA1996\6N1160 ME)ING.DOC 30 ATTACHMENT NO. Sewer 25. Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement conditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer infrastructure improvements (identified on Exhibit 41 within the EIR) to handle increased sewer flow demands: Storm Drains Please refer to Section 5.8 Drainage and Hydrology of this EIR. Natural Gas Please refer to Mitigation Measure 2 in Section 5.9 Natural Resources/Energy of this EIR. Electricitv Please refer to Mitigation Measure 2 in Section 5.9 Natural Resources/Energy of this EIR. Telephone 26. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, building plans shall be submitted to GTE enabling GTE to assess the improvements necessary to provide adequate service to the project site. C. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS Impacts associated with the following environmental issues will be mitigated to the extent feasible by the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures provided in the EIR and upon implementation of the Mitigation Monitoring Program formulated to ensure performance of the recommended mitigation measures. The following impacts cannot be mitigated to a level less than significant and wiII remain unavoidable adverse impacts. Land Use Compatibility Significant Effect The proposed Specific Plan will result in inconsistencies with the Air Quality Element due to the increase in local and regional emissions. _Finding Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). P:%19%N6N11601\FMING.DOC 31 ATTACHMENT NO. Facts in Support of Finding Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Transoortation/Circulation Significant Effect Under the Level 5 condition, the proposed interim project traffic contributes to impacts to WestminsterBolsa Chica and Bolsa/Golden West intersections. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 ofthe Guidelines). 3 Facts in Support of Findings 1 and 3 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or successor in interest as the interim trip budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled) and no further development shall be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that generates 100% of trips for the interim trip budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed and approved b the P Y City. The purpose of the updated TIA is to.-determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Are a ea (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the developer of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees (should the present or any other traffic impact fee program be in place) or provide for mitigation measures for development at the time of developments. 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation,the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget monitoring report to determine the status of the constructed and approved development applications (entitled) development and resulting expected trips within the McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip budget monitoring report shall be based upon building permits issued and (entitled) development within the McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report shall include.gross and usable square footages of the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the land usage, PA199616N11601WINDING.DOC 32 ATTACHMENT NO. and the trip generation rates used for the land usage proposed. The trip rates used in the monitoring report shall be those rates contained in the latest Trip Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 5th edition update) or another reliable source (i.e., another traffic study) as approved by the City Traffic.Engineer. Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3; .rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social,or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Significant Effect Under the Level 5 condition, the proposed interim project traffic contributes to the need for improvements at Bolsa Chica Street:Rancho to Bolsa. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Support of Findings 1 and 3 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the-extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or successor in interest as the interim trip budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled)and no further development shall be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that generates 100% of trips for the interim trip budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed and approved by the City. The purpose of the updated TIA is to determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Area (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the developer of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees (should the present or any other traffic impact fee program be in place) or provide for mitigation measures for development at the time of developments. 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation,the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget monitoring report to determine the status of the constructed and approved development applications (entitled) development and resulting expected trips within the McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip budget monitoring report shall be based upon building permits issued and (entitled) development within the P:\199 WI 16011FIIVDING.DM 33 ATTACHMENT NO. McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report shall include gross and usable square footages of the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the land usage, and the trip generation rates used for the land usage proposed. The trip rates used in the monitoring report shall be those rates contained in the latest Trip Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 5th edition update) or another reliable source (i.e., another traffic study) as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Air Ouality ' Significant Effect The-proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission during construction activities. In addition, the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non- attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Finding Finding(1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Support of Findings 1 through 3 - 1. During grading and construction, the applicant shalfbe responsible for compliance with the following: A. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. B. After clearing,grading,earth moving or excavation: 1. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust arid prevent dust pick up by the wind. 2. Spread soil binders;and 3. Implement street sweeping as necessary. P:11996V6N116017INDING.DOC 34 ATTACHMENT N0. - r C. During construction: 1. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; 2. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; 3. Use low sulfur fuel(.05%by weight)for construction equipment. D. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. _ g E. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 2. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). 3 D. Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites and super pads if construction is not anticipated within one month. E. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. F. Wash off trucks leaving site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. L Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads. 3. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water.trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. 4. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the project site and the maintenance of the paving. PA19906N116011FINDING.DM 35 ATTACHMENT NO. 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction -related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Planning Department,shall_include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interferences. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. s - Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Significant Effect The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in a short-term air quality impact due to construction activities. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. _ Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Support of Findings 1 through 3 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 1. During grading and construction,the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: P:\1996\6N11601\FMING.DGc 36 ATTACHMENT NO. A. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. B. After clearing,grading,earth moving or excavation: 1. Wet the area down, sufficient`enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. 2. Spread soil binders; and 3. Implement street sweeping as necessary. C. During construction: 1. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; 2. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; 3. Use low sulfur fuel(.05%by weight)for construction equipment. - D. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. E. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 2. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water(disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). D. Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites and super pads if construction is not anticipated within one month. E. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. F. Wash off trucks leaving site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. PA199616NI1601TINDING.DOC 37 ATTACHMENT NO. �_ I. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads. 3. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring;that vehicle movement on any unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be terminated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. 4. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for the paving of all P g access aprons to the project site and the maintenance of the paving. 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Planning Department,shall include: • Provision of rideshare incentives. • Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. • Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interferences. • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Significant Effect The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in significant cumulative long-term impacts to air quality. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Finding Finding(1) - Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. PA1996\6N11601*WDING.DOC 38 ATTACHMENT NO. Finding (2) - Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another pubic agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Support of Findings 1 through 3 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 8. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM) for review and approval by the SCAQMD and City. At a minimum, the plan shall include the following major elements and shall be implemented in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1501: • Provision of a commuter transportation coordinator, with responsibilities to include coordinating and facilitating formation of carpools and vanpools, serving as a resource person for transit information, coordinating sale of transit passes, monitoring progress towards TDM goals and surveying employees,etc. • Provision of a commuter center which would include such information as: bus and rail transit schedules/maps; telephone numbers for the designated transportation coordinator; bus route and Metrolink schedules; ridesharing promotional material; bicycle route and facility information; and location of on-site vanpool/carpool spaces. • Carpool and vanpool program, including participation in a computerized matching system, provision of preferential parking, and provision of travel allowances/financial incentives. • Encouragement of non-vehicle modes,such as bicycle,walk,or bus transit. • Transit incentives and improvements, including subsidization of transit passes and dissemination of transit information and schedules. Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of.Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. P-XI"\6N1160ITMING.DGC 39 ATTACHMENT NO. Noise Significant Effect The proposed project in conjunction with other past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in an incremental increase in traffic noise levels that currently exceed 65 CNEL. Finding Finding (1) -Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified _ P J in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Suuport of Findings 1 and 3 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measure identified in the EIR and incorporated into the project. 3. Commensurate with the updated TIA (refer to Mitigation Measure 8 in Section 5.4), an updated acoustical P analysis shall y be performed on the following two roadway segments: 1) Rancho Road near the Navy Railroad; and 2)Rancho Road between Bolsa Chica Street and Westminster Avenue to determine if potential vehicular noise will impact nearby residential units. The study will be prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engineer and include a discussion of the need for noise attenuation measures and/or noise barriers to ensure compliance with City noise standards. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific 'economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. Aari�re Significant Effect The proposed project in conjunction with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will contribute to the ongoing cumulative impacts to agricultural resources in the region. Finding Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). PA199"N1160ITMING.DOC 40 ATTACHMENT NO. Facts in Support of Finding_3 Various alternatives were evaluated in the EIR. The facts in support of Finding 3, rejecting the alternatives for failure to mitigate effects or for infeasibility for specific economic, social, or other considerations, are set forth below in Section III Project Alternatives. P:\1996\6N11601TINDING.DOC 41 ATTACHMENT NO. r III.PROJECT ALTERNATIVES This section provides findings and facts in support of the findings for the rejection of alternatives to the project. This section reflects alternatives presented in the EIR and at the public meetings and hearings: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The EIR evaluated alternatives for the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan project. Table A provides a summary of the alternatives to the proposed project that were analyzed in the EIR. The following describes each alternative and the findings and facts in support of findings that provide the rationale for the rejection of the alternatives. TABLE A SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES Alternative Technically Meets Project Environmentally Feasible Applicant's Objectives Superior FI. Noect/No Development yes No Yes 2. Development under Existing yes No No General Plan/Zoning Standards 3. Alternative Location No No No 4. Reduced Intensity-60%SP' Yes No y Buildout Source: EDAW,Inc. Alternative 1 -No Proiect/No Development An evaluation of a "No Project" Alternative is required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d)(2). Under this alternative, the proposed project would not-be implemented and the site would remain in its current undeveloped state. The No Project/No Development alternative would restrict development of the project site by not allowing the construction of the uses proposed as a result of the Specific Plan. Land uses within the project area would remain as they are currently and no development would occur. Finding Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the No Development alternative analyzed in the Final EIR(Section 15091 of the Guidelines). P:\1996%N116011FINDING.DOC 42 ATTACHMENT NO. Facts in Support of Finding 1. This alternative would not meet the objectives of the applicant nor City of Huntington Beach as stated on pages 3-15 through 3-17 of the Draft EIR. 2. This alternative is not consistent with the following goals,objectives, and policies of the City of Huntington Beach Economic Development Element,.since it is-does-not allow for further development of the site despite the fact that such development is envisioned by the General Plan. Objective ED 1.1 Enhance the City's.market potential in terms of retail, _office, industrial, and visitor serving activity. This would allow Huntington Beach to provide for retail, office, industrial opportunities that serve the current and projected population and enhance sales and occupancy tax revenue. Goal ED 2 Aggressively retain and enhance the existing commercial, industrial, and visitor serving uses while attracting new uses to Huntington Beach. Objective ED 2.5 Revitalize, renovate, and expand available industrial lands and facilities while attracting new industrial uses. Policy ED 2.5.1 Encourage and assist existing and potential industrial owners to update, modernize, and expand their industrial properties. Policy ED 2.5.2 Seek to capture "new growth"industries such as,but not limited to: • "knowledge" based industries, such as research and development firms (higher technology communications and information industries); g • communication industry service providers and equipment manufactures which are creating the next series of consumer and utility company equipment and services; • biotechnical industries; • environmental technology; and • point of sale industries. As outlined in the CEQA Statement of Overriding Consideration, the proposed project will benefit the City of Huntington Beach and the benefits outweigh the significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts which remain after the project's mitigation measures are implemented. PA19%A6N11601TMING.D0C 43 ATTACHMENT NO. Alternative 2 -Development unde -Existing General Man/Zoning Under this alternative, the proposed Specific Plan project would not be implemented; however, the project site could be developed under the existing General Plan land use designation and existing zoning. The site could be developed under the existing General Plan designation for the project site, which is Industrial,with a floor area ratio not to exceed 0.75. Development allowed under the existing General Plan designations of the project site includes manufacturing, research and development, professional office and supporting commercial-type uses. The existing zonin of the site is Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial with a high rise overlayg zoning allows for industrial/manufacturing-type uses. �� This It is anticipated that development of this alternative would occur in a piece-meal manner and would not have the benefit of a "Master Development Concept," including comprehensive planning for Circulation, Public Facilities,Landscape, and Phasing. It is also anticipated that this alternative would not provide for buildout of the site under a comprehensive set of Design Guidelines. Finding Finding (3) - Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the Existing Zoning alternative identified in the Final EIR g (Section 15091 of the Guidelines). Facts in Sunnort of Finding 1• Onsite and offsite land use compatibility impacts would be greater without the policies related to landscaping and buffers that are associated with the proposed Specific Plan. 2. Aesthetics/urban design impacts would be greater compared to those associated with the proposed project without policies related to landscaping and buffers and the Design Guidelines section, as included in the proposed Specific Plan. 3• Light and glare impacts would be greater compared to those associated with the proposed project. Policies to ensure that proposed lighting within the Specific Plan area does not result in significant impacts would not be implemented. 4.. This alternative would result in greater impacts to water and sewer than the proposed project, without the Master Plan of water/sewer improvements that has been prepared along with the Specific Plan. 5. This alternative does not eliminate or reduce to a level less than significant the unavoidable adverse impacts to land use(Air Quality Element), transportation/circulation, projects.air quality, noise, and agriculture associated with the proposed project and cumulative j 6. This alternative does not meet the objectives of the applicant nor City of Huntington Beach as stated on pages 3-15 through and 3-17 of the Draft EIR. PA199616NI 1601TINDING.DOC 44 ATTACHMENT NO. f 7. This alternative creates potential impacts that are avoid ed ided or redu ced un der nd the protect... proposed 8. This alternative is not supportive of the following policy of the City of Huntington Beach Economic Development EIement: Policy ED 2.3.1 Strive to reduce all discretionary permit and licensing processing time. _ 9. This alternative is not supportive of the following policies of the Growth Management Chapter of the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan: 3.03 The timing, financing, and location of public facilities, utility systems, and transportation systems shall be used b SCAG to Y implement the re _ P gion s growth policies. 3.10 Support local jurisdictions actions to minimize red tape and exp edite the permitting to maintain economic vitality competitiveness. 10. This alternative is considered environmentally inferior to the proposed project. As outlined in the CEQA Statement of Overriding Consideration, the proposed project will benefit the City of Huntington Beach and the benefits outweigh the significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts which remain after the ProJect's mitigation ion measures areimPlemented. Alternative 3 -Alternative Location This alternative considers locating the proposed project at a different site. This alternative is required by CEQA and is intended to evaluate the option of the development of the proposed project at another site. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, any alternative site evaluated herein must have similar characteristics as the project site including size, landform, and amenity opportunities. Development would include the same type of use, density, and intensity as the proposed project site. Upon a preliminary analysis of the potential sites of 307 acres within the City of Huntington Beach, the Holly-Seacliff development site was selected for consideration as an alternative site; however, this site was rejected from further review due to various constraints encountered. The City Council agrees and hereby finds that there are no feasible alternative sites, particularly in light of the fact that the "project" under consideration is a Specific Plan for a site already designated by the General Plan and zoning for the t analyzed in the Draft EIR. The site was rejected from further review in the Draft EIR for the following reasons: 1• Two (2) areas within the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area are currently zoned for Industrial development. Two _(2) areas within the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan are PA199616N11601WMING.DOC 45 ATTACHMENT NO. + �__ .. . tmn b .. c�rrlrrtat....:: went ...........:.:::::.:::.::.....::.:...........:.::.:::::::.:::.::.;:.:.:.;:.::.>::.: :::::.:......:.::::::::.................................................::::::. .::........... ......... ....... .......' ................................::::::::...::::::::. ............::............::::::::::::: TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Dire for BY: Herb Fauland, Senior Planne DATE: September 9, 1997 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 96-1/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-6 (McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan) LOCATION: The 307 acre site is generally bounded by Rancho Road and the U.S.Navy spur track on the north, Springdale Street on the east, Bolsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Street on the west. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for Planning Commission consideration is a request by McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6, which are proposed to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11, and certification of Environmental Impact Report (EIR)No. 96-1. The Specific Plan will establish the zoning designation and includes development standards for the 307 acre McDonnell Douglas site. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to establish the planning concept, design theme, development regulations and administrative procedures necessary to achieve orderly and compatible development of the project area; and to implement the goals,policies, and objectives of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards, and specifications will be the zoning provisions for the site. Subsequent development plans,parcel maps, and other entitlement requests for the project area which are consistent with both the Specific Plan and City of Huntington Beach General Plan shall be pre-entitled and subject to site plan review and approval by the Community Development Director. Any development regulation and building requirement not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of an individual request. The EIR analyzes the potential environmental effects associated with the implementation of the Specific Plan,which allows for the cohesive development of a mix of industrial and commercial/retail/office uses. The Planning Commission will need to consider the environmental impacts and take action on the Final EIR prior to action on the Specific Plan. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the adequacy of EIR No. 96-1 and approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 for the following reasons: • With the proposed EIR mitigation measures,the project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, and safety to persons working or living in the area,not detrimental to the value of property or improvements in the area. • The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will allow for the creation of a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. The proposed project promotes the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will stimulate business opportunities within the City by allowing for and encouraging development consistent with the Specific Plan under an expedited entitlement process. Additionally, the Specific Plan provides for a range of employment opportunities in the professional,retail, service and industrial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening the employee base of the community. • The Specific Plan identifies design and architectural standards, consistent with the intent of the Urban Design Element. • The Specific Plan development procedures,regulations, standards and specifications are consistent with the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. With the mitigation measures imposed,the project will not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties or residents. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Recommend Certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements with a Statement of Overriding Considerations by adoption of Resolution No. 1528 and forward to the City Council (Attachment No. 4);" B. "Recommend Approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 as amended with findings and forward to the City Council for adoption(Attachment No. 1)" ALTERNATIVE ACTION(SI: The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. Deny Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1, Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 with findings. B. Continue Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1,Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 and direct staff accordingly. Staff Report-9/9/97 2 (97sr42r) GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: McDonnell Douglas Realty Company, Inc., Stephen J.Barker, Director of Business Operations,4060 Lakewood Boulevard, 6th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90808-1700. PROPERTY OWNERS: Multiple REQUEST: To master plan the 307 acre site by developing a specific plan to establish the planning concept, design and architectural theme, development regulations, infrastructure needs and administrative procedures necessary to achieve an orderly and compatible industrial park. The specific plan shall implement the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. With the adoption of the specific plan, all future development consistent with the specific plan shall be pre-entitled and subject only to review and approval by the Community Development Director. ZMA: To amend Sectional District Map No. 9-5-11 by changing the zoning map designations on the 307 acre site from Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial- High Rise Overlay (IL-H)to McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. ZTA: To amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by adding the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The specific plan shall be the zoning for the 307 acre site and include the development regulations, design and architectural guidelines, and administrative procedures to implement the general plan designation of Industrial General. The specific plan will allow for the continued operation and expansion of the aerospace facility and the development of manufacturing, warehouse, office, research and development and commercial uses. EIR. The applicant is requesting acceptance of an environmental document as having been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),the State CEQA guidelines, City policies, and certification that the data was considered in final decisions on the adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. DATE ACCEPTED: August 1, 1997 Staff Report-9/9/97 3 (97sr42r) SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZaN1NGl LAND;USE Subject Property: I(Industrial) IL(Limited Industrial) Aerospace facility, IL-H(Limited Industrial- Light Industrial, High Rise Overlay) Manufacturing, Office North of Subject RL-7(Residential Low Density) RL(Low Density Low Density Property Residential) Residential Uses East of Subject RL-7 (Residential Low Density) RL(Low Density Commercial and Single Property: CN(Neighborhood Commercial) Residential) Family Residential CG(General Commercial) Uses South of Subject I(Industrial) IL(Industrial Limited) Commercial,Office Property: CO(Office Commercial) CG(General Commercial) and Manufacturing West of Subject - Orange County Flood Control Orange County Flood Orange County Flood Property: Channel- County of Orange Control Channel Control Channel U.S.Navy Weapons Station U.S.Navy Weapons U.S.Navy Weapons - City of Seal Beach Station Station PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Zoning Text and Map Amendments be processed to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan (Specific Plan#11). The objectives of the specific plan are to prevent further piecemeal development of the area and to facilitate development of a cohesive mix of industrial and commercial uses with a distinguishable character for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area. The Specific Plan accomplishes this by establishing a planning concept, design theme, development regulations and administrative procedures necessary to achieve an orderly and compatible development of the project area. The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist. Subsequent development plans, parcel maps, and other entitlement requests for the project area which are consistent with both the Specific Plan and City of Huntington Beach General Plan shall be pre-entitled and subject to site plan review and approval by the Community Development Director. The intent is to establish a public-private partnership to enable the development of a high quality business park without impacting the City's circulation and infrastructure system. Project History The subject site has undergone a large planning effort beginning in 1962 when the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission granted Use Variance No. 433. This permit allowed structures of up to 250 feet in height to accommodate the McDonnell Douglas aerospace facilities that currently occupy the site. The use variance covered the majority of the site, but did not include the 66-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue. The use variance allows research, Staff Report-9/9/97 4 (97sr42r) developmental testing, laboratories, and facilities able to accommodate development/exploration of space vehicles. In 1980, the McDonnell Douglas Realty Company, initiated development plans for 66 acres of the project site. The proposal consisted of a 1.2 million square foot industrial/office complex consisting of industrial/warehouse buildings, office buildings, a hotel and restaurant,parking structures, access roads and landscaped open space. The office building was proposed to be a six to seven-story structure. The nearby hotel would have a tower of the same height. The plans were for development under the provisions of the Restricted Manufacturing (Ml-A)zone which allow for"appropriate"mixed uses subject to approval of a conditional use permit. At that time,the applicant also applied for a zone change to allow for a Multi-Story (MS) suffix designation which had an unlimited height allowance and an EIR (No. 80-2) was also prepared for the project. The project(CUP, ZC, & EIR)was approved and certified in March 1981, however, construction of the project was never pursued. In January, 1991, the applicant submitted a request to amend the land use map of the General Plan on 62 acres of the project site from General Industrial into four different land use designations: Medium Density Residential (15 units/acre) on 8.48 acres; Medium-High Density Residential (25 units/acre) on 19.41 acres; High Density Residential (35 units/acre) on 19.84 acres; and General Commercial on 10.02 acres. At that time a zone change was processed in conjunction with the General Plan Amendment. An EIR (No. 91-2)was prepared for the project and certified but the project applications were denied. Recently,the City of Huntington Beach updated its General Plan(May 1996). The General Plan update confirmed the existing industrial land use designation and floor area ratio of.75 for the entire 307 acre site. In addition, an EIR was prepared, certified, and approved for the anticipated build-out of the General Plan. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan The proposed Specific Plan creates a master development plan for the 307 acre site. The Specific Plan includes five dominant components to implement these project goals: • Development Concept/Land Use Plan • Circulation Plan • Public Facilities Plan • Design/Architectural Guidelines • Development Regulations Each of the components is described in greater detail below, except for the "Development Regulations" which are summarized under the"Zoning Compliance" section of this report. Staff Report-9/9/97 5 (97sr42r) 1) DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT/LAND USE PLAN: The specific plan divides the 307-acre project site into six (6)Planning Areas. The purpose of identifying individual Planning Areas is to create distinct subareas of potential future uses and to allow for private development to occur in a timely manner with an overall Master Plan Concept. The following is a brief description of each Planning Area: WDoNNELL DOUGLAS EIR 96-1 s q a® City of Huntington Beach ss9q 04 7 4oaa •aq p p o �o ro n A, p 4 q� Oa Q-'c r Ptea` qo 4''Se qa4 a qpr p� q # c Planning Area 2 Planning Area S Planning Area IA _ Planning Area 3 No Avenuc ONo scale Exhibit 5 EDAW, Inc. Proposed Planning Areas SOWW:EDAW.Im - Planning Area 1 & 1A - includes the existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace(MDA)Facility comprised of approximately 2,789,053 square feet of building area and approximately 8,000 parking spaces on 100 net acres of land. The Specific Plan contemplates the continued expansion of aerospace facilities pursuant to existing entitlements, which entitlements include expansion rights. Planning Area 1A, located directly south of Planning Area 1, is also anticipated to be developed as additional McDonnell Douglas research and development operations and/or industrial, research and design and office uses. MDA has recently informed City staff of potential plans to expand the aerospace facilities. Although no formal City applications have been filed. Staff Report-9/9/97 6 (97sr42r) Planning Area 2 - is comprised of 58 net acres of land located along Springdale Street and Bolsa Avenue to Able Lane. Portions of this planning area are currently occupied by the following uses: Sharp Electronics a 538,859 square foot administration office and warehousing/distribution facility on 23.4 net acres of land; and Cambro Manufacturing a 120,000 square foot manufacturing facility on 11.9 net acres of land(with an ultimate building area of 280,412 square feet). The remaining vacant acreage is expected to be developed with research and development facilities, office space, light industrial, warehouse and/or distribution uses. The Dynamic Cooking systems facility (Conditional Use Permit No. 96-73)has also been approved in this planning area and is currently under construction; the facility will consist of a 167,950 square foot manufacturing building on 7.5 acres. Planning Area 3 - currently vacant and west of Planning Area 2, is ultimately anticipated to be developed with office, light industrial, warehouse and distribution uses. The Airtech International facility (Conditional Use Permit No. 96-104)has been approved within this planning area but has not yet been constructed; the facility consists of a 121,500 square foot manufacturing/distribution facility on 5.5 acres. Planning Area 4 - is comprised of 35 net acres of vacant land along the northern perimeter of the project site. The property is intended to be developed as an expansion of the current McDonnell Douglas aerospace facility located in Planning Area 1 (south of Planning Area 4). Expansion of aerospace facilities into Planning Area 4 would be subject to review to ensure consistency with the design standards in the Specific Plan and compatible with the residential uses to the north. Planning Area 5 - consists of 40 acres, located at the northeast intersection of Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. Phase one development of this planning area is complete,which includes an 8-story, 235,831 square foot office building (constructed in 1989). Phase Two is anticipated to include a 12-story, 345,551 square foot office building, restaurant, and support commercial services. An application by Extended Stay America for the development of a 104 room, three-story executive suite hotel on 2.15 acres has been submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for review and approval. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Bolsa Chica Street and Skylab West. 2) CIRCULATION PLAN: The Specific Plan includes a Circulation Plan illustrating the general alignments, p al nts, classifications location g g g , and design of cross-sections for public and private streets within the Specific Plan area. The proposed circulation plan is consistent with the Huntington Beach General Plan Circulation Element. Access to the Specific Plan area is provided via a system of arterial highways including: Bolsa Chica Street; Springdale Street; Bolsa Avenue; Graham Street; and Rancho Road. A number of entry drives and public transportation facilities are also identified. The interior streets within the Specific Plan are: Able Lane, Astronautics Drive, Graham Street, Skylab Road, and Skylab Road West. The system is designed to accommodate traffic around and within the project area resulting from ultimate buildout. Section 5.4 Transportation/Circulation of the EIR provides a detailed impact analysis of the proposed Circulation Plan. Staff Report-9/9/97 7 (97sr42r) 3) PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN: The Specific Plan includes a Public Facilities Plan which identifies existing and proposed infrastructure, storm drain, sewer, and water facility improvements to serve development within the Specific Plan area. A specific analysis of infrastructure requirements and detailed design, construction and phasing plans can be found in the Infrastructure Master Plan Appendix F of the EIR. Infrastructure impact analyses are included within the appropriate sections of the EIR. The Specific Plan identifies and requires sufficient infrastructure and public facilities to adequately and efficiently support any and all anticipated land uses and activities. These improvements will be phased to coincide with or precede individual development proj ects. 4) DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES: The Specific Play,includes Design/Architectural Guidelines to establish an integrated character for the development of a business park complex. The major elements of the Design/Architectural Guidelines include: site planning, architecture, streetscape, landscaping, and signing. The Specific Plan includes several policies related to these elements with which all future development proposals within the Specific Plan area shall comply. The Specific Plan also includes a Landscape Concept to establish the design character and visual qualities of the interior and perimeter of the project area. The Landscape Concept is comprised of several design elements, including: the public arterials, local and private streets, entryways, access drives,parkway areas, transitional edges and security fencing and walls to create a cohesive community landscape image. The Specific Plan includes several policies with which all individual landscape plans for future projects located within the Specific Plan area shall comply. 5) DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: see Zoning Compliance section. ISSUES General Plan Conformance: The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the 307-acre McDonnell Centre Business Park project site, Industrial (FAR .75). The proposed project will allow for the development of the site with a variety of aerospace, manufacturing, warehouse, office, R&D and commercial uses. These uses are consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan as a component of the Specific Plan and have been provided as an appendices (Volume Two)to the Specific Plan. This section explains how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. Staff Report-9/9/97 8 (97sr42r) Environmental Compliance: In June 1996, the City contracted with the firm of EDAW, Inc. to prepare EIR No. 96-1. EIR No. 96-1 was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and addresses potential environmental impacts associated with Zoning Text and Map Amendments to implement the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The EIR serves as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and was prepared under the requisite procedure that is outlined below: June 14, 1996 Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be necessary for the project. June 14, 1996 A Notice of Preparation was distributed by the City and filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare an EIR. June 24, 1997 Notice of Completion filed with the State Clearinghouse. Draft EIR available for public review and comment for forty-five days (Comment period: June 24, 1997 to August 7, 1997) September 9, 1997 Public hearing before Planning Commission to recommend certification of EIR No. 96-1 and adoption of Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 Environmental Impacts The EIR provides an overall analysis of potential impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. The issues discussed in the EIR are those which have been identified in the course of extensive review of all potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The EIR discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of Land Use, Aesthetics/Urban Design, Light and Glare, Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality,Noise, Earth Conditions,Drainage and Hydrology,Natural Resources/Energy, Public Services and Utilities, Agriculture, and Socioeconomics. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the EIR,the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. There are, however, some adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. These include both project-specific and cumulative impacts from Land Use and Air Quality and cumulative impacts from Transportation/Circulation,Noise, and Agriculture associated with the project. These effects can be lessened by mitigation measures suggested in the EIR and have been described in greater detail below: Staff Report-9/9/97 9 (97sr42r) Land Use The project is consistent with the General Plan policies as demonstrated in the consistency analysis of the Specific Plan(see Attachment No. 6); however,the proposed Specific Plan will result in inconsistencies with the Air Quality Element due to the increase in local and regional emissions. The impact remains significant and unavoidable. Virtually all new projects of this size within the basin currently exceed air quality standards. Transportation/Circulation The proposed project in conjunction with other past,present,and reasonably foreseeable future projects will impact roadways and intersections. Under buildout year 2015 condition,the proposed project in conjunction with other past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will impact Bolsa Chica Street from Rancho Road to Bolsa Avenue and the intersections of Westminster/Bolsa Chica and Bolsa Chica/Golden West. A cumulative unavoidable impact has been identified, since feasible improvements do not exist to bring the two intersections and roadway segment within acceptable levels of service. The traffic analysis prepared for this project was based on worst-case development assumptions for the Specific Plan and buildout of the City's General Plan. Therefor,there exists the potential that year 2015 assumptions may have been overly conservative. The proposed mitigation measures have been required to monitor trips resulting from actual entitled development. Additionally,mitigation is proposed requiring that an updated Traffic Impact Analysis be prepared when 90%of the Interim(year 2000)Trip Budget is reached. The project in and of itself does not result in unavoidable traffic impacts. Air Quality The proposed project is anticipated to exceed Southern California Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) daily threshold emission during construction activities. In addition,the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. A total of six mitigation measures have been proposed to reduce short-term emissions. The proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for Carbon Monoxide(CO),Nitrogen Oxide(NO),and Hydrocarbon(HC). The daily exceedance of the thresholds for CO,NOX and HC is a long-term air quality impact. In addition,the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 8 within the EIR has been proposed to lessen this impact.Virtually all new projects of this size within the basin currently exceed air quality standards. Staff Report-9/9/97 10 (97sr42r) Noise On a project-specific level,the development allowed under the Specific Plan in and of itself will not result in unavoidable traffic noise impacts;however,the proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in an incremental increase in traffic noise levels that currently exceed 65 CNEL. This impact would remain significant and has been categorized as unavoidable. Although the EIR identifies a significant unavoidable noise impact,the analysis is conservative in that noise projections(as identified in Table BB of the EIR)do not take into account the mitigating effects of any intervening structures, such as walls,that may affect ambient noise levels. Agriculture The proposed project in conjunction with past,present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will contribute to the ongoing cumulative impacts to agricultural resources in the region. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. According to the State Department of Conservation, a project will have a significant effect on the environment if it will convert at least 80 acres of prime agricultural land to non-agricultural uses or impair the agricultural productivity of prime agricultural land. The proposed project will convert approximately 30 acres of important farmland(not currently in agricultural production)to urbanized uses,which is under the threshold defined by the Office of Land Conservation, and will not result in a significant impact to the conversion of agricultural resources. Additionally,the site has not been in agricultural use since 1994 and future agricultural uses are not anticipated. Thus,the project in and of itself does not result in unavoidable impacts to agriculture. Project Alternatives A range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project were analyzed in the EIR pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(see Section 6.0 of the EIR). The discussion of alternatives focuses on alternatives capable of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives or would be more costly. The EIR also presents mitigation measures that ensure that future project impacts will be mitigated to an insignificant level. The mitigation measures proposed in the EIR will be attached to the Specific Plan. As future projects within the Specific Plan area come forward for Site Plan review,the mitigation measures will be incorporated for each project. Staff Report-9/9/97 11 (97sr42r) Statement of Overriding Considerations Where impacts cannot be mitigated to an insignificant level(see Section 8.3 of the EIR) in order for the project to be approved,a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted. The proposed Statement of Overriding Considerations is Attachment No. 4. CEQA requires the decision makers to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects,the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable by the City. The specific reasons why the adverse environmental effects identified in Section 8.3 of the EIR are considered acceptable are included in the attached Statement of Overriding Considerations. A summary of the project's relationship to impacts found not to be significant,impacts mitigated to a level less than significant, unavoidable adverse impacts, and mitigation measures are included as Attachment No. 7. Prior to certification and adoption of the EIR by resolution,the Planning Commission may amend the document. It should be noted,however,that removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures will require findings and justification. Comments on the draft EIR were received from several agencies and interested parties. Staff has responded to all comments received. The comment letters and responses have been provided in Attachment No. 7, as one of the volumes of the Final EIR. The final EIR must be certified prior to action on the project. Zoning Compliance: The applicant is requesting a zoning text and map amendments from the existing Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay (IL-H)zoning designation to a Specific Plan (No. 11)zoning designation. Appropriate zoning modifications would be made to Sectional District Map No. 9-5-11 for the 307-acre site. The Specific Plan development procedures,regulations, standards and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance). Please see the following page for a comparison of the Development Standards proposed within the Specific Plan project and the development standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Staff Report-9/9/97 12 (97sr42r) i ZONING CONFORMANCE MATRIX HBZSO Issue .. C....0de McDonnell Douglas Specific PlanDevelopmentStandards Se0ion Provision _. Planning Areas 1 IA 2 3 4 5 L M K A C D G H I B E F J Maximum Intensity(F.A.R.) 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 212.06 Minimum Lot Size(AC) 20,000 sq. ft. 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Minimum Lot Frontage 100' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 212.06 Maximum Building Height 40' 250' 1 50' 50' 1 50' 1 50' 1 50' 1 40' 1 40' 1 50' 1 50' 175' 1 75' 1 75' Maximum Lot Coverage 50%. 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 1 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 1 60% Minimum Setback 212.06 Front 10';20' 20' 25' 35' 35' 35' 35' 25' 25' 25' 35' 35' 35' 35' 212.06 Interior 15' 10, 15' 10, 15' 15' 10, 10, 15' 15' 10' 10, 10, 10, Side 212.06 Exterior 10, 15' 25' 15' 25' 25' 15' 15' 25' 25' 15 15' 15' 15' Side 212.06 Rear Side - 10' 15' 10' 15' 15' 10' 10' 15' 15' 10' 10' 1:0 10' 212.06 Minimum Landscape 8% 10% 10% 15% 10% 10% 15% ]0% ]0% 10% 15% 15% 1 S% 15% 212.06 Minimum Perimeter Landscape Front 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 10' IS' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' Interior Side 5' 5' 5' S' 5' 5' S' 5' S' 5' 5' 5' 5' Exterior 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, Side Interior Rear 5' S' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Exterior 10, 10' 10, 10, 10, 10, 10' 10, 10, 10' 10, 10, 10' Rear i Adjacent to Arterial Highway - NA NA 24' 24' NA 24' 24' 1 NA NA 24' 24' 24' 24' The eastern portion of the project site contains a multi-story suffix,which allows for multi-story buildings. 2 A zero-side yard setback may be permitted in I districts,but not abutting an R district,provided a solid wall at property line is constructed of maintenance-free masonry material and opposite side yard is a min. 30 feet. 3 Required front and street-side yards adjacent to a public right-of-way shall be planting areas except for necessary drives and walks.A 6-foot wide planting area shall be provided adjacent to an R district and contain one(1)tree for each 25-lineal feet of planting area. Staff Report-9/9/97 13 (97sr42r) Coastal Zone Compliance- Not Applicable Redevelopment Plan Status• Not Applicable Design Review Board Status: Not Applicable Subdivision Committee: Not Applicable Other Departments Concerns: The Specific Plan and corresponding EIR(including Technical Appendices)were circulated to other Departments for review and comment. All Department comments/recommendations have been incorporated into the Specific Plan and/or included as mitigation measures within the EIR. No conditions of approval have been applied to the Specific Plan project. As individual development proposals come forward for Site Plan review, specific conditions of approval would be applied by various departments as deemed necessary. In addition,bi-weekly meetings were set up that included city staff,the consultants,the applicant, property owners and interested parties. The meetings have been ongoing for the past eight months. The meetings covered numerous issues regarding the development of the specific plan, infrastructure issues, environmental issues,processing, and future uses at the site. The meetings allowed all parties to participate in the discussions and provide input in the development of the specific plan. Public Notification: Legal notice of the Planning Commission hearing was published in the Orange County Register on August 30, 1997, and notices were sent to property owners of record within a 1,000-foot radius (city policy)of the subject property and interested parties. ANALYSIS: The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan has been prepared to achieve an orderly and compatible development of the 307 acre project area. The intent is to establish a public private partnership to enable the creation of a"Campus Park"industrial setting and to achieve high quality in individual building design. In order to accomplish this,the Specific Plan includes Design/Architectural Guidelines to establish the character and style for the development of a business park with buildings and streetscape that have a distinctive visual identity. The overall guidelines discuss architectural, landscape, and signing guidelines proposed for this area. The Specific Plan also includes development regulations and standards that will be applied to individual projects within the Specific Plan area in order to achieve and maintain this cohesive, compatible design theme. The Specific Plan also establishes the alignment and design of a circulation system, and all public facilities and infrastructure necessary to facilitate a master planned development. The Specific Plan Staff Report-9/9/97 14 (97sr42r) identifies and requires sufficient infrastructure public facilities to adequately and efficiently support any and all anticipated land uses and activities. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan incorporates provisions and regulations which differ from the traditional industrial zoning standards used in,the remainder of the city. The first and primary concept is to create a"sense of place"through consistent and compatible design standards. Image and aesthetic concerns will be implemented to create a common landscape theme, and reinforced with consistency in building setbacks, orientation and design. Further regulations are proposed for signing, building materials, and uses in order to assure that the variety of individual components can be assembled in an overall compatible manner. The application of the regulations on individual projects will result in a total development which will express a unique aesthetic theme. In order to provide for some design and creative incentive, deviations to the development regulations are permitted. The draft Specific Plan states that deviations up to twenty (20)percent should be allowed. However, staff is recommending that a maximum of ten(10)percent be permitted. This is consistent with discussions with the Planning Commission and acceptable to the applicant. The Specific Plan is intended to be the city's regulatory standards for this portion of the community over the next twenty years. Therefor, anticipating a need for some flexibility in the document, a method for minor modifications to the text and content has been proposed. Minor modifications should be limited to items which clarify the intent of the Specific Plan. These additions and deletions should relate to the overall planning issues and should not be applied to individual projects. All other modifications will be considered major and will require the processing of a Zoning Text Amendment, subject to Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. In an effort to better facilitate and expedite development within the Specific Plan area, a new method of securing individual project entitlements is being proposed. Projects which comply with the Specific Plan regulations will only be subject to a site plan review approval by the Community Development Director. If approved the project will be subject to no additional analysis or public review. All environmental, infrastructure and design concerns will have been completed as part of the Specific Plan adoption. In addition, the Director's actions are not subject to appeal, except by the applicant. The proposed process will provide McDonnell Douglas Realty Company an opportunity to market the remaining portions of the property with a distinct competitive edge over similar sites in Orange County. This upfront planning and environmental effort and approach will significantly shorten the processing time required for large scale industrial projects which benefits both the applicant and the economic base of the community. Planning Commission Study Sessions As part of this process, a series of study sessions have been conducted with the Planning Commission. The intent is to provide the Planning Commission and other interested parties with an early look at the proposed planning concept for the site and to begin reviewing the major issues. A number of issues were raised regarding the traffic analysis in the EIR. A written response to those issues and questions has been prepared and is attached for review(see Attachment No. 9). In addition, based upon comments at the study sessions, staff is recommending that the maximum percentage permitted for deviations to development regulations be ten(10)percent. The staff recommendation is acceptable to the applicant. Staff Report-9/9/97 15 (97sr42r) D v SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1 and approve the Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 and Map Amendment No. 96-7 for the following reasons: • With the proposed EIR mitigation measures,the project will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, and safety to persons working or living in the area,not detrimental to the value of property or improvements in the area. • The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will allow for the creation of a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. • The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Economic Development Element of the General Plan. The Specific Plan will stimulate business opportunities within the City by allowing for and encouraging development consistent with the Specific Plan under an expedited entitlement process. Additionally,the Specific Plan provides for a range of employment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and industrial fields,thus stimulating business opportunities and widening the employee base of the community. • The Specific Plan identifies design standards, consistent with the intent of the Urban Design Element. • The Specific Plan will not significantly change the existing industrial zoning and uses of the site. Approval of the Specific Plan will not result in significant impacts to City zoning compatibility. • The Specific Plan development procedures,p p p regulations, standards and specifications are consistent with the relevant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. With the mitigation measures imposed,the project will not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties or residents. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Approval -ZMA No. 96-1 and ZTA No. 96-6 2. Location Map 3. Current and Proposed Zoning Designations Map 4. Resolution No. 1528 (Final EIR No. 96-1)with Statement of Overriding Considerations 5. CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts 6. Draft Ordinance No. (ZTA No. 96-1 and ZMA No. 96-6)with exhibits: Exhibit A-1, Legal Description Exhibit A-2, Sectional District Map 9-5-11 Exhibit B, McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan(under separate cover- not attached) 7. Final EIR No. 96-1 (under separate cover-not attached) 8. Technical Appendices EIR No. 96-1 (under separate cover-not attached) 9. Response to Questions &Issues -Planning Commission Study Session(8/26/97) Staff Report-9/9/97 16 (97sr42r) It y. ORDINANCE NO. 3372 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 AND CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL) AND LIMITED INDUSTRIAL-HIGH RISE OVERLAY (IL-H) TO MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 FOR THE AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY RANCHO ROAD, SPRINGDALE STREET, BOLSA AVENUE, AND BOLSA CHICA STREET IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (ZMA NO. 96-6; ZTA NO. 96-1) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate public hearings relative to Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1, wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council,the City Council finds that such zoning map and text amendments are proper, and consistent with the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the real property subject to this ordinance, hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property," is generally described as the approximately 307 acre site bounded by Rancho Road on the north, Springdale Street on the east, Bolsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Road on the west, and is more particularly described in the legal description and sketch attached hereto as Exhibits "A-1" and"A-2,"respectively, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 1 &4:97-ordinances:ZMA-96-6 RLS 97-625 SECTION 2. That the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11, attached hereto as Exhibit`B" and incorporated by this reference as though Hilly set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3. That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from Limited Industrial (IL) and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay (IL-H)to McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. SECTION 4. That the Director of Community Development is hereby directed to amend Sectional District Map No. 9 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Code to reflect the changes contained in this ordinance. The Director of Community Development is further directed to file the amended map. A copy of such map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of October , 1997. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney PROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: Ci y Administrator Director of Co unity Development Exhibits: A-1: Legal Description A-2: Sketch B: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11 2 &4:97-ordinances:ZMA-96-6 RLS 97-625 A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION northerly of the southerly line of said section, said last men tioned southerly line being also the center line of Bolsa Avenue The following provides the legal description for the entire as shown said last mentioned parcel map, said tangent line McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan area, which is being also the southerly line of said Parcel 1; thence along said bounded by an at grade spurtrack of the US Navy (railroad tangent line, North 89025'20" West 23.70 feet to tangent 38.00 right-of-way) and Rancho Road on the north, Springdale Street foot radius curve, concave northerly; thence, continuing along on the east, Bolsa Avenue on the south and Bolsa Chica Street the southerly line of said Parcel 1 and said tangent curve, and the Orange County Flood Control District channel on the through a central angle of 8044'46", a distance of 5.80 feet; west. Refer to Exhibit 1 in the Specific Plan. thence, tangent to said curve, North 80040'34" West 58.12 feet to the beginning of a tangent 62.00 foot radius curve, concave A portion of fractional Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 11 southerly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a central West, partly in the Rancho Las Bolsas and partly in the Rancho angle of 8°44'46", a distance of 9.46 feet; thence, tangent to La Bolsa Chica, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of said curve, North 89°25'20" West 52.35 feet to the beginning of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 51, a tangent 62.00 foot radius curve, concave southerly; thence, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County along said tangent curve, through a central angle of 8044'46", a Recorder of said county, described as follows: distance of 9.46 feet; thence tangent to said curve, South 81°4954" West 58.12 feet to a tangent 38.00 foot radius curve, Commencing at the Southeast Corner of said section, said point concave northerly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a being also the center line intersection of Springdale Street and central angle of 8044'46", a distance of 5.80 feet to a tangent Bolsa Avenue as shown on a map of Parcel Map No. 93-202, line which is parallel with and 60.00 feet northerly of the recorded in Book 281, pages 3 and 4 of Parcel Maps, in the southerly line of said section; thence, along said last mentioned Office of said County Recorder; thence North 0°16'04" East tangent line, North 89°25'20" West 4117.58 feet to a tangent 2055.80 feet along the center line of Springdale Street, said 59.13 foot radius curve, concave northerly; thence, along said center line being also the easterly line of said section; thence tangent curve, through a central angle of 16041'56", a distance North 89°28'58" West 50.00 feet to a point on the westerly line of 17.23 feet; thence, tangent to said curve, North 72043'24" of Springdale Street as shown on said parcel map, said point West 20.88 feet to the beginning of a tangent 83.13-foot radius being also the northeast comer of Parcel 3 of said parcel map curve, concave southerly; thence, along said tangent curve, and the Point of Beginning; thence, along said westerly line through a central angle of 16°41'56", a distance of 24.23 feet; and parallel with the easterly line of said section, South 0016'04" thence, tangent to said curve, North 89°25'20" West 49.12 feet West 1965.58 feet to the southerly terminus of the easterly line to the beginning of a tangent 83.13 foot radius curve, concave of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 95-136 as shown on a map there- southerly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a central of recorded in Book 288, pages 49 and 50 of Parcel Maps; angle of 16041'56", a distance of 24.23 feet; thence, tangent to thence, along a tangent 30.00 foot radius curve, concave north- said curve, South 73052'45" West 20.88 feet to a tangent 59.13 westerly, through a central angle of 90°18'36", a distance 47.29 foot radius curve, concave northerly; thence, along said tangent feet to a tangent line which is parallel with and 60.00 feet curve, through a central angle of 16041'56", a distance of 17.23 feet to a tangent line which is parallel with and 60.00 feet gent 83.13 foot radius curve, concave westerly; thence, along northerly of the southerly line of said section; thence, along said said tangent curve, through a central angle of 16°41'56", a dis- last mentioned tangent line, North 89025'20" West 597.93 feet tance of 24.23 feet; thence tangent to said curve, North to the westerly terminus of the southerly line of Parcel 2 of 16004'45° West 20.88 feet to a tangent 59. 13 foot radius curve, Parcel Map No. 87-424, as shown on a map thereof recorded in concave northerly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a Book 237, pages 4 through 6, inclusive, of Parcel Maps in the central angle of 16041'56", a distance of 17.23 feet to a tangent Office of said County Recorder; thence, along a tangent 30.00 line which is parallel with and 80.00 feet easterly of the center foot radius curve, concave northeasterly, through a central line of Bolsa Chica Road as shown on said last mentioned par- angle of 90002'30", a distance of 47.15 feet to a tangent line cel map; thence, along said tangent line, North 0037'10" East which is parallel with and 80.00 feet easterly of the center line 2,031.46 feet to a tangent 30.00 foot radius curve, concave of Bolsa Chica Road as shown on said last mentioned parcel southeasterly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a cen- map, said tangent line being also the westerly line of said Parcel tral angle of 49°52'31", 26.11 feet to a tangent line which is par- 2; thence, along said tangent line, North 0037'10" East 221.35 allel with and 50.00 feet southeasterly of the center line of feet to a tangent 180.75 foot radius curve, concave easterly; Rancho Avenue as shown on a Record of Survey recorded in thence, continuing along the westerly line of said parcel and Book 60, page 13 of Record of Surveys; thence, along said tan- along said tangent curve, through a central angle of 9°26'16", a gent line, North 50029'41" East 2382.14 feet to the southerly line distance of 29.77 feet; thence, tangent to said curve, North of the 75.00 foot wide Right-of-Way described in deed recorded 10003'26" East 31.14 feet to a tangent 180.75 foot radius curve, in Book 1296, page 88 of Deeds in the Office of the County concave westerly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a Recorder of said county; thence, along said southerly line, central angle of 9026'16", a distance of 29.77 feet; thence, tan- South 39°28'30" East 877.72 feet to a tangent 1,947.78 foot gent to said curve, North 10003'26" East 227.87 feet to the radius curve, concave northeasterly; thence, along said tangent beginning of a non-tangent 18.00 foot radius curve, concave curve and said southerly line, through a central angle of northeasterly, a radial to the beginning of said curve bears 50000'28", 1,700.02 feet to a tangent line, said tangent line South 27000'26" West; thence, along said non-tangent curve, being also the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of through a central angle of 63036'44", a distance of 19.98 feet to Parcel 1 of said previously mentioned Parcel Map No. 93-202; a tangent line which is parallel with and 80.00 feet easterly of thence, along said tangent line, South 89028'58" East 492.00 the center line of Bolsa Chica Road as shown on said last men- feet to the northeasterly corner of said last mentioned Parcel 1 tioned parcel map; thence, along said tangent line, North and the beginning of a non-tangent 383.39 foot radius curve, 0037'10" East 49.56 feet to a tangent 59.13 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly, a radial to the beginning of said curve concave easterly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a bears North 32°30'55" East; thence, along the northeasterly line central angle of 16041'56", a distance of 17.23 feet; thence, tan- of said parcel and said non-tangent curve, through a central gent to said curve, North 17019'06" East 20.88 feet to the angle of 47051'40", 320.26 feet to the northwesterly corner of beginning of a tangent 83.13 foot radius curve, concave west- Parcel 2 of said Parcel Map No. 93-202; thence, along the erly; thence, along said tangent curve, through a central angle northerly line of Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 of said parcel map, South of 16041'56", a distance of 24.23 feet; thence, tangent to said 89°28'58" East 598.07 feet to the Point of Beginning_ curve, North 0037'10" East 49.12 feet to the beginning of a tan- Containing 308.44 acres, more or less. 2 PLANNING ZONING DM 9 ' ECTIONAI DISTRICT MAP 9-5-II - NOTE° CITY OF aNE.s:NT ARE,N T ANT zoNE ND- ♦ pNT Or N �s I. * o WIND To TN[ CENTER ADOPTED ,TUNE 28,1880 0<G N D: Of WAY IECrENO CITY COLNCIL ORDINANCE NO.7T9 � LON DENsrtr II.SDlNNt OgTRCT AEN= Sam ORD.NQ ,�Q p �N ®RESTRICTEo NANO/ACTVRINo DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH I ' 2.� CD-RMTr NCRT6IEDVCAT WIDSrR CT 1-f1.8S IlADDa0tE26D8 NULTBRpRT 06rR11.T ® RO�IE.R DISTRCr MAISIE STREET ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA "'TAIWANrwSDW E I WESTMINSTER j 9 �J AVE L R a R S rye N _ JANE Si. r o / a z W o p1 IS a = PL. - v o 11,11 or ...TINGT 8c RI Rl N s � v RI RI RI i' cNDtDDR R a� RI V RI = RI RI J RI C SANDS OR cR. 99 OOI.LAR 2 RI R R MI-A � �R R4 R CF-E �`� �0 tFRANNL:ry y:x:a;.� RI o , R1 1 O`RG /o -- -----------------..--------_ ...� R+ = RI RI7 RI DR. NUGBET CR M+n RI U 5, NAVY R R NNTf �\ I.C.RE9.NRrT MI-A MI-A MI-At MS M IA - - - - --..... ' ------ sxrue -- U U cMI-A MI-A-MS m J • nx+ss BOLSA AVE R/ _ a PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) l PUBLIC NOTICE -' "—SECTION 2 That the McDonnell,Centre S S. LEGAL NOTICE _ Business.Park Specific ORDINANCE Plan, No. 11, attached. County of Orange ) N0.3 3 7 2 hereto as Exhibit "B" and AN ORDINANCE OF THE 'incorporated by this refer- ' ,CITY OF HUNTINGTON once as though fully set BEACH AMENDING' THE forth herein; is hereby ap- UNTINTO I am a Citizen of the United States and a ZONNGGAND SUBDVIII-"�proved and adopted. SION ORDINANCE BY.t SECTION,3- resident of the County aforesaid; I am ADOPTING THE MCDON- That the zoning design- NELL CENTRE BUSINESS . tion of the Subject Property over the age of eighteen years, and not a PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. ' Is hereby changed from Limited Industrial QL) and party to or interested In the below CHANGINGAND THE.ZONING't Limited Industrial-High Rise,.i entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of DESIGNATION"FROM LIM- Overlay .(IL-H)'to. McDon ITED INDUSTRIAL.(IL)AND neil Centre_Business Park LIMITED .INDUSTRIAL-" ;Specific Plan No.11. the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a HIGH RISE OVERLAY'(IL.. I SECTION H) TO MCDONNELL CEN-- That the-Director of COW,f newspa er of general circulation printed TREBUSINESSPARKSPE- munit Development, is / CIFIC PLAN.NO. 11 FOR y THE AREA GENERALLY hereby directed to amend ' and p u 1 I s h e d in the City of Huntington BOUNDED BY .RANCHO Sectional District Map No.9 ROAD, SPRINGDALE (9-5-11) of.the Huntington Beach, County of Orange, S tate o f STREET, BOLSA AVENUE,. Beach Zoning and Subdivi- AND B O L S A C H I C A sion Code to reflect;the California, and that attached Notice Is a STREET IN THE CITY OF changes contained In this . HUNTINGTON BEACH.. ordinance. The'Director of true and com fete co as was rimed (ZMANO.96.6; p copy f ZTA NO.96-1) . Community Development is and published in the Huntington Beach SYNOPSIS furthor directed to file the amended and Fountain Valley issues of said WHEREAS, pursuant.to nded map. A-copy of \✓a the State Planning. .and such map,,, amended, shall.be available for in- Zoning Law,the Huntington• spection in the Office of newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: Beach. Planning Commis- the City.Clerk. sion and Huntington Beach This Ordinance City Council have held sep- shale-take',effect 30 days arate public hearings,rela- after its passage, tive to Zoning Map Amend- THE FULL TEXT ment No.•96-6 and Zoning. ' OF THE 'ORDINANCE IS _ Text Amendment No. 96-1, ;AVAILABLE IN THE CITY October 30 , 1997 wherein both bodies have -. CLERK'S OFFICE: carefully considered ail in- ADOPTED- formation presented at said by the City Council of the hearings, and after due City_of Huntington Beach at considerations of the find- a regular meeting held ings and recommendations Monday.October 20, 1997,• declare, under penalty o f perjury I h a t of the Planning .Commis- by-the -following, roll call / sion and all,evidence pre-• vote: the foregoing is true and correct. sentedto said City Council, AYES:Counclimembers: the City Council finds that Julien, Harman, Dettloff such zoning.'map text Bauer,Sullivan,Green, amendments are proper, Garofalo and_consistent with the- NOES:Councilrnembers:- e Executed on Qneral'Plan. r)f-tobex 3(1/ 199 7 ____ ,NOW,THEREFORE, None at Costa Mesa California. the,City Council of the City ABSENT:Councilmembers: / of_Huntington.Beach does None , j ordain as follows: CITY OF SECTION 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH That.the real property sub- CONNIE BROCKWAY. ject to this ordinance,here- CITY CLERK -. inafter referred to as the Published Huntington "Subject Property;'is gen- .Beach-Fountain Valley In- pally described as ap- dependent October 30,• ,proximately 307 acre site•1997.'' j bounded by Rancho Road 105 539 ` on the north, Springdale Signature 'Street on the east, Boise Avenue on the south, and. Boise Chlca Road and the Orange County Flood Con-, trot District Channel on-the west. See .Exhibits "A-1 and"A-2" file In the City Clerk's Office for the legal ` description. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT -1 AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 ON FILE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 2ND FLOOR - CITY HALL tl3 ......... . ....... FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N - TECHNICAL APPENDICES McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 ON FILE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 2ND FLOOR - CITY HALL y r .ra y/ G ........... ZONING CONFORMANCE MATRIX tatxtl .... ......... ............ ........... .........*1.......P.....Q4 ....... Pi ning Areas 1A 2 3 4 5 L M K A C D G H I B E F J Maximum Intensity(F.A.R.) 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 212.06 Minimum Lot Size(AC) 20,000 SF NA 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Minimum Lot Frontage 100, 100' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 212.06 Maximum Building Height 40" 250' 250' 50' 50' 50' 50' 1 50' 40' 1 40' 50' 50' 175' 1 75' 75' Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% 1 60% 1 60% 1. 60% 1 60% 1 60% 1 60% 1 60% 60% Minimum Setback 212.06 Front 10';20' 20' 20' 25' 35' 35' 35' 35' 25' 25' 25' 35' 1 35' 35' 35' 212.06 Interior Side2 15' 15' 10, 15' 10, 15' 15' 10' 10' 15' 15' 10, 10, 10, 10, 212.06 Exterior Side 10, 10, 15' 25' 15' 25' 25' 15' 15' 25' 25' 15' 15' 15' 15' 212.061 Rear Side - 10, 15' 10, 15' 15' 10' 10' 15' 15' 10, 10, 10, 10, 212.06 1 Minimum Landscape 8% 8% 10% 10% 15% 10% 10% 15% 10% 10% 10% 15% 15% 15% 15% 212.06 Minimum Perimeter LandscapO Front 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 10' 15' 157 15' 15' 15' 15' Interior Side 5' 5' 5' 5' 51 5' 5' 59 5' 57 5' 5' 5' Exterior Side 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 107 10, 10, 109 10, Interior Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 51 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Exterior Rear 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 109 10, 10, 10, 10, 1 10, 10, 10, Adjacent to Arterial Highway NA NA 24' NA 24' 247 NA NA 24' 1 24, The eastern portion of the project site contains a multi-story suffix,which allows for multi-story buildings. 2 A zero-side yard setback may be permitted in I districts,but not abutting an R district,provided a,solid wall at property line is constructed of maintenance-free masonry material and opposite side yard is a min. 30 feet. 3 Required front and street-side yards adjacent to a public right-of-way shall be planting areas except for necessary drives and walks.A 6-foot wide planting area shall be provided adjacent to an R district and contain one(1)tree for each 25-lineal feet of planting area. 3 _ P_ "'� ✓ y 3 y A � 3 J1 a r Alice & Dave Goecke 6002 Jade Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714 895-5625. September 3, 1997 S E P 0 5 1997 1 EP,AF1;iME r Mr. Howard Zelefsky Huntington Beach Planning Commission 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1 Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6 Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1 Mclonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Mr. Zelefsky, We are writing to express our concern regarding the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park and to request that the proposed business park project will also include a plan that will protect the neighbors from additional "traffic noise abuse". We are home owners in Huntington Beach and our house is located behind the block wall along Springdale Street across the street from McDonnell Douglas property and the site for the proposed business park. The traffic noise near this proposed business park is barely tolerable now, and we know it will become even worse when future development is completed. We are in favor of new development, but we certainly do not welcome any additional traffic noise. What can the City and the McDonnell Douglas Realty Company do to help alleviate the traffic noise which will incur as a result of a new business park? Our suggestion is to have McDonnell Douglas Realty Company fiance the City to construct an extension to the existing block wail to serve as a sound barrier, making it-at.least 6 feet tall or even taller, if p�isible. We invite you to look at the existing wall across from the proposed business park. This wall is shorter than many of the block walls within the City. Listen to the disturbing traffic noise and see if you too don't agree that a higher wall is needed. Our property value is in jeopardy already due to the current traffic noise level. If a new business park is constructed, there will be even more traffic noise and our home values will decline even further, if the problem is ignored. It is not right for a proposed project to have a building plan that would infringe upon its' neighbors. Every effort should be made to protect the integrity of the effected neighborhood. We are asking that the McDonnell Douglas Realty Company be a good neighbor and to include in their proposal a plan to provide a means to buffer the traffic noise. We believe that the business community and the quiet neighborhoods of Huntington Beach can coexist in harmony. We are asking the McDonnell Douglas Realty Company to do the right thing and to be a considerate neighbor and for the City of Huntington Beach to consider the rights of neighboring residents. -2- _ We have addressed our concern to McDonnell Douglas, and in their reply letter dated August 8, 1997, they said that they have discussed our suggestion with City Staff and have determined that this is a major policy decision that rests with the City and should be addressed` through the normal public hearing process. We brought this problem to the attention of Ms. Julie Sakaguchi, Dept. of Community Development, City of Huntington Beach, in our letter dated June 30, 1997, and we also wrote letters to Sharp Corp., McDonnell Douglas and First Team Real Estate. All parties responded to our letter except for,the-City of Huntington Beach. Please give careful consideration to this request. We would appreciate an acknowledgement of this letter so that we will know that it was received. Sincerely. y Alice & Dave Goecke 9-09-1997 9. 19AM FROM DAVE BARTLETT 714 894 2670 P. 1 NOW D. BARTLETT ASSOCIATES LAND USE&PLANNING CONSULTANTS W92 Jade Circle.Huntington Beach.California 92647 714.$93.0600-fax 714.8941670-f-maO.dabartQaol.com MEMORANDUMFAX Date: SEPTEM, BER 9, 1997 To: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Fax A 714-374-1540 Attention: EDWARD KERINS, CHAIRPERSON Re: MCDONNELL CENTER BUSINESS PARK No. of Pages: 2 in-cluduig cover sheet Dear Mr. Kerins and Members of the Planning Commission: This letter represents a brief analysis of the staff report that I have reviewed for the above referenced project. I am a resident at 6092 Jade Circle, directly east of the proposed project. I am also a land use and planning consultant, having represented local agencies,landowners and developers. I have written Specific Plans as well as reviewed them on behalf of local jurisdictions. I have had my private practice for l 1 years. I cannot attend tonight's meeting because of a previous commitment. There are several modifications I would suggest that would be in the best interests of the City and the home owners adjacent to the project. ❑ I am comfortable with the pre-entitlement concept. However,because of the size and com- plexity of the project,I think it is essential that the Planning Commission be involved in the site plan review and landscape review process. This could be fast-tracked and might even be appropriate for the consent calendar. It is very important that the Commission stay involved as this project is implemented to insure that impacts to adjacent residential neighborhoods are addressed and that the parkway concept and landscaping along the arterial setbacks serve the best interests of the City. The current proposal that would allow only an administrative review by staff, with appeal ply by the applicant, is not acceptable. 9-09-1997 9:20AM FROM DAVE BARTLETT 714 894 2670 P. 2 Huntington Beach Planning Commission September 9, 1997 Page 2 Re: McDonnell Center Business Park Specific Plan Q For Planning Area 2,adjacent to Springdale Street,there should be no curb cuts with access to the site from Skylab Way only. El For Planning Area_, maximum building heights should be the same as what has already been approved for Sharp, Cambrio and Dynamic Cooking. ❑ For all Planning Areas,we would like to request that landscaping be 15%. Because of the intensity of the development,this is not an unreasonable request. ❑ It appears that the mitigation measures outlined for Transportation/Circulation require that future studies be completed to ensure that impacts are reduced to a level less than significant. CEQA does not permit mitigation measures that rely on future studies. This issue should be reviewed with your City Attorney to insure that mitigation measures are appropriate. Addi- tionally, because of the traffic generated,if approved, the project should be required to construct a new railroad crossing on Springdale north of Skylab. This crossing is beyond repair and looks as though it could be re-engineered for safety. ❑ It would appear that an updated TIA should be required when 50% of the trip budget is reached and again when 90% of the trip budget is reached. It may be too laze if the TIA update is only completed once at 90%. 0 I have not had the opportunity to review in detail the Specific Plan, and would Iike to reserve my comments and address the Commission at another meeting or, directly address the City Council. Would it be possible to receive a copy of the proposed Specific Plan? 0 Staff should clearly point out to the Commission and the public the "significant unavoidable adverse impacts" that this project would create, as indicated in the EIR. I could not find this information in the staff report. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. COPIES TO: g - Dave Bartlett A total of 2 pages are being uumnitted including this uansmival sheet. If you do not roc eive all the pages,or if this fax is received in error.please contact DBA at the phone number listed above. H ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH- INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - HUNTINGTON BEACH Memorandum DATE: September 3, 1997 CONN"w"j'�''Y To: HERB FA-ULAND, Senior Planner FROM: JIM MOORE, NUdget & Research Manager, Police Department RE: Correction to Final EIR#96-1 for McDonnell Centre Business Park In Section 5.10 - Public Services and Utilities, page 170 (Police), a statement is made that the police department is currently on a hiring freeze for police officers. This is not correct. The department actively recruits officers to replace others as they leave and strives to maintain its existing compliment of 224 sworn officers. Where there may be some confusion is that four years ago, the department was awarded a COPSMORE Grant enabling it to hire an additional six officers and one sergeant, and were actually added to the department's table of organization. However, this three-year federal grant only paid a small portion of the personnel costs for these officers and required a commitment to maintain these positions following the conclusion of the grant period. Due to the City's financial situation at that time, increasing personnel costs was not possible and over a period of a few months,"'the d'ecFsior was made to decline this funding offer. But these positions were never removed from table of organization in hopes that someday it will be possible to recruit for these officers. So until then, these additional positions have been placed on-hold, or frozen. cc: Chief Lowenberg CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Community Development FROM: Duane Olson, Fire Marsh Fire Department SUBJECT: September 9, 1997 DATE: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan EIR Proposed Mitigation Measure (REVISED) At such time as a public safety development fee is adopted by the city of Huntington Beach, the applicant/developer of the project processed within the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific shall pay such fee prior to issuance of building permits. xc: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator Ronald Lowenberg, Police Chief Michael Dolder, Fire Chief Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Howard Hubert, Deputy Fire Marshal/Development RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 96-1/ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96-6 (McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 _ _ RCA ATTACHMENTS ST US '. Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attomey) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attomey) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached __ _ ......... . ..... __.. EP'LANATION FOR. MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FORWA DEC (� Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) City Administrator (Initial) ( ) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FO:R RETURN QF ITEM. Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - TO: Connie Brockway, City Clerk l FROM: Gail Hutton, City Attorney f; DATE: October 3, 1997 SUBJECT: Notice of Hearing-McDonnell Douglas Specific Plan RLS 97-781 r ` _Pursuant to Community Development Department policy,the above specific plan hearing was noticed by mail to property owners within 1000 feet of the project site. This exceeds the requirements of state law. The Government Code only requires notice by publication of the adoption of a Specific Plan. (Sections 65453, 65355, 65090.) The hearing does not need to be continued for lack of adequate legal notice. g q g S . I Gail Hutton ' City Attorney 1 . i i PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) i.- PUBLIC NOTICE_' willallowf& the continued' operation and expansion of 5271. and refer to the NOTICE OF the aerospace facility-and above Item. Direct your S PUBLIC HEARING the development of manu- written communications to facturing, warehouse, of. the City • BEFORE THE. Clerk. ! C o u p fy of Orange CITY) OF HE CITY OF five,NCIL Con research and devel City Clerk f opment and 'commercial HUNTINGTON uses. City of. BEACH EIR: - Huntington Beach �. NOTICE .IS HEREBY Addresses potential envi- 2000 Main Street,2nd I am a Citizen of the United States and a GIVEN that on Monday,' Floor, Huntington October 6 1997 ' at ronmental impacts assocl- resident of the County aforesaid I am ty Beach, C�a8lifornia T:00 PM . in the Ci ated with the Zoning Text I Council Chambers, 2000 Amendment and Zoning (714)538.5227 over the age of eighteen years and not a i Main street, Huntington. Map Amendment-to allow � 9 Published Huntington for the adoption o the Me below ' Beach,the City Council wring will Donnell Centre Business Beach-Fountain Valley in- 'dependent to o r interested I n the b e l o w hold a public.hearing on dependent .September 25, 'the following items: Park Specific Plan,No. 11._ entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of 1 1, ZONING TEST The ElR has been prepared 11997. 094-M p p In compliance with the Cali- AMENDMENT NO. ND- fomia Environmental Qual- the f�UNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a �MENTAL ZONING .MAP 'AMEND- i Apt MENT NO.96-6/ENVIRON- ty Location: newspa er of general circulation, printed IMPACT REPORT The307acatiore isgener- treINO Business (McDonnell Con- ally bounded by Rancho and p u l i s h e d in the City of Huntington errs Business Park Specific Plan) Applicant:. McDon Road and the_U.S. Navy Beach, Countyof Orange, State Of spur track on the north, g pall Douglas.Realty Com- Springdale Street on the. California, and that attached Notice is a iDirector-ofhBusine sarker Op- east, Boise Avenue onthe 1-master rations. Request: To{south, -and Boise _Chico true and complete copy as was printed master plan the_307 acre Street on the west. and published- in the Huntington Beach site by developing a spe- 1 Project Planner: cific plan to establish the HerbFauland, Senior Planner. . and Fountain Valley issues of said lPlanning concept, design NOTICE IS and architectural theme, HEREBY GIVEN that Item newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: development regulations, #1.is covered by Environ- Infrastructure needs and mental Impact Report No. administrative procedures 96-1 necessary to achieve an or- ON FILE: derly "and compatible In- A copy of the proposed re- dustrial.park. The specific quest is on file in the Com- plan shall. implement.the ;munity Development De- September 25 , 1997 goals-and policies of the partment,2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach General ? Huntington. Beach, Call. Plan. With the adoption of fornia 92648,for inspection the"specific plan, all future by the public. A copy of development consistent the staff report will be I declare, under penalty of perjury t li a fi with the specific plan shall available to interested par- be pre-entitled and.subject 1 ties at City Mail or the Main' i only to review and approval 'City-Library (7111 Talbert the foregoing is true and correct. by the Community Devei- Avenue) after October 2, opment Director. ZMA- ALL INTERESTED To amend'Sectional Dis- PERSONS are invited to at- trict Map No. 9-5.11 by-!tend said hearing and-ex- Executed on changing the zoning map press opinions or submit September 2 5, 19 9_Z__ designations on the 307 evidence for or against the at Costa Mesa, California. I acre site from Limited In- application as outlined dusfrfal (IL)and Limited In. above. If you challenge the dustrial-High Rise Overlay City Council's ,action in (IL-H) to McDonnell Centre court, you may be limited-. Business Park Specific to ralsing only those issues Plan No.11. `you or. someone .else ZTA: raised at the public hearing i To amend the Huntington a described In this notice, or Beach Zoning and Subdivi- 'In written correspondence { sion Ordinance by adding delivered to_the City at, or. 1111 the McDonnell Centre Busi- ., prior to,the public hearing. ness Park Specific-Plan I If there are any further Signature No. 11. The specific plan I questions please call the shall bethe zoning for the Planning.Division .at 536- 307 acre site and include the development regula-. tions, design and architec- tural. guidelines, and ato Implement r ent procedures to designation the general plan \\ designation of Industrial +4 General. The specific plan NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �t= BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Wit.. Piu:.,.= py g1�8� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �""C NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, October 6, 1997,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following items: ❑ 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 96-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.96- 6/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 96-1 (McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan) Applicant: McDonnell Douglas Realty Company, Stephen J. Barker,Director of Business Operations Request: To master plan the 307 acre site by developing a specific plan to establish the planning concept, design and architectural theme, development regulations, infrastructure needs and administrative procedures necessary to achieve an orderly and compatible industrial park. The specific plan shall implement the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. With the adoption of the specific plan, all future development consistent with the specific plan shall be pre-entitled and subject only to review and approval by the Community Development Director. ZMA: To amend Sectional District Map No. 9-5-11 by changing the zoning map designations on the 307 acre site from Limited Industrial(IL)and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay(IL- H)to McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. ZTA: To amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by adding the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The specific plan shall be the zoning for the 307 acre site and include the development regulations,design and architectural guidelines, and administrative procedures to implement the general plan designation of Industrial General. The specific plan will allow for the continued operation and expansion of the aerospace facility and the development of manufacturing,warehouse,office,research and development and commercial uses. EIR: Addresses potential environmental impacts associated with the Zoning Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to allow for the adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The EIR has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Location: The 307 acre site is generally bounded by Rancho Road and the U. S.Navy spur track on the north, Springdale Street on the east,Bolsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Street on the west. Project Planner: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after October 2, 1997. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (g:1ega1s:counci1:97CC 106)) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH : ...: .... .. ..l..�T - - ..: ..: ... - .;:'? >?:>?:?::: `:C "?i:::?: :.:,��%?i:?:?i::>< i=:=::=:::i ';:E'i;-^E?i?i?ii :c:;:` ?:??:::: :i<:::::.'• ?:::ii :>::::? TO: Planning Staff FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director DATE: September 15 1995 SUBJECT: PUBLIC NOTWICATIOI FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL SITES AND SIM GREATER THAN FIVE ACRE`IN SIZE?' In order to insure all property owners potentially impacted by a proposed project are notified of any city public hearing,the following expanded notification requirements shall apply. FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL SITES: Public notification requirements for zoning and general plan applications pursuant to the HBZSO, which includes an area map and mailing labels for all property owners, shall be expanded as follows: A. Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Amendments shall be 1,000 ft. radius from the perimeter of the public school site. B. Any other required zoning application for reuse, change of use,or expansion of use on a public school site not adjoininLy an arterial highway shall be 1,000 ft. radius from the perimeter of the public school site. C. Any other zoning application for reuse, change of use, or expansion of use on a public school site adjacent to an arterial highway shall be 500 ft. radius from the perimeter of the public school site. D. In addition to the above, any property that abuts a local street beyond the expanded radius where the local street serves as the primary accessway from the school site to an arterial road shall be included. Also,the applicant needs to be encouraged to conduct their own community meeting(publicly noticed by sending out announcements/flyers)before submitting an application to the city. The purpose is to inform the public of the project proposal and receive public input. This will establish a communication line and aid the applicant in designing a project that is compatible with the neighborhood. SITES R AN UYE A!QM IN SUE: Public notification requirements for Zoe Map Amendments and General Plan Amen&nwu slxall b I,000 ft. radius from the perimeter of the site, cc: City Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, Melanie Fallon, Ray Silver (g:\hess\memos\95-05.doc) V CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST 1r-AIt'5-'tK-Tb. .D SUBJECT: I IL c1 C.. - ( 7 "� c1 (o ( 4-' (,v - Ci DEPARTMENT: lUL1Nl MEETING: 0 'L'T )L CO ......nv::::::::;v:n:v:n:.::::{:::::::.:M:::::}:::::'.,.:•.:.v:::::::::is i}::}?}:::...::: ::::::::.::.:.................................... ..v:::x: •v::y:}:.}}}v::::::::}::::::.:??U.......::?i:.:.}•.}{•:�}i:{v:n•::::::.:::v::....:•i}}:`:4:•}}:v}}}i}'•.. ........ ...... .:::.......................... ..:...........................,............:.:v:.v::;:::;;::::::::::n:n:v:::..........:::.......::.+v:v;};v:;.+..:.::::::::•:::....:.y:::rw:::.::v:.:::.::•.-.v:::::.:'::.v:. .� v; •: .. ...::..:............:::::.w:;::v:::::::..........:::::::::;.............:.:::::::::.:.::..........::::::.:::::::%.::{.}•::.v:.v::4.vn:•::y::.::.:::.vvx:.vv:::::::.v:::v::::::::.v:::::::::.v:.4}:::::..v::.xv:v::. h...........v... .. .......... ..� :.4 .:.........v rr:....n..+.:::::..x:::.:v:- n:?::.:.vv:•y.-{}!?4\.5..::^Jvi:.... .............. 14.............. ................... ...3.:,?:v...............•�.{v:Y.4.:.:.n.v..v.:.;•}•n}}Y:ayy}::,.........n:.n.4•n}iti:.... ,h........ n.ro. ..... .... :.::::::....... ................ ........%:..::::..:::ni}}:i,v{.:.:•:}.ri:'.2:4:x:.�:::5:'}'r..x.Y•';,..:ti:v'r-?:o}:;ii .WvKi+Yi•r.•X.+mrb^:•?G'!i3:yyyl.Tj.$Nvtiti�:. .'l.•}•.}.y.•.:Y:. ..:. v ..nv v... n.. ....v..... ............. ........ t : %n 4:?....n..T..A...y.r:.......... .... n, ..... ... .. :.v:........r:::.v::•::::,.a.}:..::::::::.•:.::::::n.:•:i::::i:::::.v:.v::::.v:::w..,...........:.nv:+....A. -21 ......a... ...:::w::n...........n..n•.v::::.v:.:....-.::,.w.:::::.v::::....R...4'.K•}}:}}v::x: - .. .........:.{{{:.v,'�:>).v:........ {. ......t..::..................::}:{.v.::v:.v.n:;}}•x::{::nvi i}:4}::•}}}::n:v:::::}iii}}}:.}•::::nv.:.....: .. , :...... %.r....... +�: ......T\Y✓!v,'?..............................00+J.3::.:5:<:}'{fi::3i%ys: .4r.} :.M.v..:.nn .v :..::r:nvx:r... ........... ...:.J?,h.,CF•.v....•::..: ..N^.Y.•.nW.Y^n.1. .n v :: :.v. :::.v::;:.v::.vv:v.•:v........x.v.: _, w..%•r.nvw..ma:;.. nnr }r%tii'•i:::}}:�n{.?4:4:is}sv:}''':y:�'if}'}:4}:??v::��r�:ii i}": .. .. :.... 'f.m.,:rvw:v::.v.•.:: ...::.:....................... .................:.::.:::..::::::::::::.::.........:.......:........};Y.n.:..:..v::::.:.::xS:::v:MA.Y......n..wv::::Y. ,..:}:... rxuJ}:i:.vv•n::v •2?.# ..? .. i{ ....::x.: ...T..'.r-;'�.'-::n..:......n..n. ".......v....'.:4Y'r£ri:.F........:..r::}'v}..i.:.}'::::::..... ...........:...:...s: :..::.::::::•::::v::.v:::::.:•:::•.v:.v:::::.v::.v•:::i::::}i}ii}:ti??vi:.}i}}::_:}:}}}:�ii}}i}}}}:.}i}}:�i:}isii i::::.:vi}iiiii}i}:}:}:4}}:{:'::}iiii}}}}}}}:4i:iiv:4}:iii:':::i}:::-i::'::}:is}:.:::::-i:.i:?.i::. ... ....:...::::::w:::::.........:..v:::.�::.v:.::::.::,v::.....::::v:-::::w::;n:.:....,r:::n:•;:•;nv:n:.:.:v......:v.;v:::::.v.... ,NrrCN3+P:n•.v:}{:::-3?v».w:•'}.....4.•.nu.:::::........................................ ..... .n.. ........................... ................n......... ................... ..... vn....xu:w•.vx::x::yv..:::x::::::.::::::::r`.:.t::.•::::::::.v::::n,w.v::::n vv:v::v:::.•.v:::::::v:::•.:.v.. ....:::.v:�:i:A.'•�L.KW.. ''w:.::.%v::,{i4.w.m.{!y;:i:i:}?.4::. i.:.ytv... .... ....:.::.:................................:...... vnx....::::: .....r:::::::................ ....:::::v.v::..,.............?%•}}v.avx....ro.n..,..,.:.v;%a•::::,,a+w:;x -}}%'}:w: ......... ....................................... ......... ... f... ..... ....v.,x....:,,:...Y4:{:•;•;x.:.;?^:..::::::4:.:4ii}x::}};i}v?:::..:::.:...:,n'.:!•i}..:�:... ......... ..:::......................!:}.:.hY.vw..:..:., ,i?•w.%.%...::{.}A.'i:.ti::J:ti':i:ti J'•::::LL:::!?'}:}':} - af ter... .. ti'/A YES NO Does Heading and Closing of Notice Reflect City Council Hearing(Not PC) ( ) (vr Is a Map attached and/or is a quarter page legal ad required? If appeal, is appellant's name shown on legal notice? ( ) ( ) (✓� If housing is involved, is "legal chaLenge paragraph" included? ( ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, are the RESIDENT labels attached and is the Coastal Conunission Office on the labels? ( ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit, has the Master Legal Notice Document been used? Is Title Company verification letter attached? (- } (4 (. ) Were the latest Assessor's Parcel Rots used? (Please attach verification of Title Co. or indicate - that rolls used were derived from Assessor's Rolls in Planning Dept.,whichever applicable) ( ( ) Is dayof ublic hearing correct - � / P � t Monday/Tuesday? Has the City Administrator's Office authorized the public hearing to be set? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? Are the appellan applican)names and addresses on mailing labels? For Public Hearings at the City Council level, please insert the below paragraph of the public hearing notice '_ALL-L'gTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing-an ss Qp mans or submit to the City Clerk written evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions, please call (insert name of Planner) at 536-5271 CONNEE BROCKNVAY, CITY CLERK CITY OF HUNTD�GTON BEACH 2000 MALti STREET-21N, D FLOOR ITUNT]UNGTON BEACH, CALIFOR\Ls►92G•38 _ (7I4) 536-5227 CAs./PLBHER R MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 ------------- ------------ --------------------- Community Development Approval of the EIR 96-1, ZTA, 96-1, and ZMA 96-6 for the McDonnell Center Business Park Specific Plan NUMBER OF HEARINGS: TODAY'S DATE: 09/16/97 9:38 AM VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: , Ray ilver Assistant City Administrator 9/16/97 9:38 AM 02 md2 3 ab' -- L o ob S USAN W. CASE, INC. OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE 917 Glenneyre Street,Suite 7,Laguna Beach, CA 92651 PHONE(714)494-6105 • FAX(714)494-7418 CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS LIST THE ATTACHED LIS PRESETS THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WIIN5 at)I&I FEET OF THE EXT OR BOON I S O THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM METRO CAN, A DATA SOURCE, UTILIZING THE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND OTHER DATA SOURCES. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS GENERALLY DEEMED RELII�BLE, BUT IS NOT GUARANTEED. SUS_AN W. CASE, INC. Vv- Vq-l\,AA .� - 2iW -lb n'4 Connie Brockway, City Clerk QI C City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 l 1 195 18201 �nthony R & Madeleine M Pacini Sr. MSINGT c\ 5492 Harold Drive p Huntington Beach CA 92647 w Z 1 LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING tea? t � c —;a i =ti1 II :i:i il: i;:ii::isii:=: >>lii=i�:ii:::i:i;:i :::::i:ii n Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach o- Office of the City Clerk id P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �.� o" 19.5 212 14 �iG7 ���n � � 177 0 Charles E3aclet .n,�ss 5641 a--p� q��leSSo ; alb INGTpy� ntington Beach CA 92647 ���ink%10 !j� w RETURN s, ZGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk (� City of Huntington Beach (�= v Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 191 06 796 Dennis A cola 14351' iwera Dr 3- IN6Tp',� Huntington Beach CA 92647 P�.r f0 Li y .40 <�P RE T # 0 SF i T> M�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �, I Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 /tV�y) 195 191 14 ° John R Burke 14372 Nevada Drive 4��NTIN6lpy� Huntington Beach CA 92647 P T F LEGAL NO I - PUBLIC HEARING I�. � 7t.¢J ? T1`J SLI Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ( P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _ IN6Tp�, 19519303 837 add%ss y Robert I Pfeffer 5542 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 0 LEGL,NOTICEf :PUBLIC HEA ING Connie Brockway, City Clerk � t City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ILI- P.O. Box 190 �� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 f' 1 9 5 19 i 80 �.j t � 4 John ; Burke r ING 14372 Nevada Dr i .w•u,,,, BF9 Huntington Beach CA 92647 U"R uNTr LEGAL NOTICE- POBU D-HEARING `J2-SA? Nu-tb i Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 19303 :�i a Robert Pfeffer � , 5542 Stardust Drive �J�;, ���'�r Huntington Beach CA 92641-�,,,'? '!q �P o4�U� IN6T pyBF V ,- I !" L-T U R N -u ' - " 1TT ¢,,,, LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING s4v7la Connie Brockway, Y Cit Clerk CL� � Y -- City of Huntington Beach Q�( Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntingt726 cYt;CA 92648 � ' - , _,� � �'�, o. •'?.� icy - 195 196 10� n,4 t p 69� (1 Q Patricia Burt ING �� 14471 Spa Dr �STp- ��O ��, Huntington Beach CA 92647 co pUNTV LEGAL NUTlQE-r PUBLI;� HEARINU Connie Brockway, City Ci Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 \ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 O 7�).f Z , v V \ IN6 v �UNZTp"y 195 212 01 980 ��p� _•w'°"„"o B�. \� \ David B & Nancy Harris C., .— — s 5632 Nevada Dr cp Huntington Beach CA 92647 uNT1 cP 'LEGAL TI 0 CE - PUBLIC HEARING '���s�? �'-'�k'C!" ..• _ .� li.tia::t:isii:::i::ii:=.3:li::s:t:ili:i::t't�:atai::t,,::itisi! i �—Connie Brockway, City C Clerk 7 City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk �— l P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �NTINGTQ 19518104 770�1'� Robert C Pollock _ o 5052 Cheryl Dr .— y Huntington Beach CA 92649 �QUNTr LEGAL-NOTICE PUBLI6--HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach mm` 16 Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _ y 195 185 17 146 K wjn P 8: Rhonda H Maher 'd"6 14441 pa---iDr `7 Hut ngton Beach CA 92647 L�9 L IN6TOy t ' r UZ) I _��C °uN 0Tr LEGAL NOTICE - P 1%Q HEARING`-- -' '1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 072 12 David John Griffis �uNT1N6tpy 5958 Westminister Blvd Westminister CA 92683 w ' It ISIS. �p00NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 1 `( 3 CFsB s--:,�46 2'$Lfsfi.`. 11iii133JSlilliiii?iifili!??�i14 il111111l'efi11:fill55 till 11fllall Connie Brockway, City Clerk I c'--L`l City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IAA` i'r r / 4 4dU��, ��;;-,, � der J "195 196 09 168 �Js�'�41 David Lee Harrington 0' INGTU 14481 Spa ®r FO Hunt�n Beach CA 92647 gtor� �- ycF `F•'�i,,,�.�`Vie► ��I ,.: - �� _ , " =.��� � � TY - LEGALNOTICe-= USLIC HEARING s-a-14-? —e-ti ,1 92`3rLfi+ yam. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach ! ' Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190v�. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s t� 195 441 39 Robert&Mary Jaramillo 5151 Churchill Ave INGIp', Westminister CA 92683 w � S o =_ - �O�NTY ca` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk I P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A 66`�`-SSA i 95(�72 12 662 David John Griffis _ 5958 Westminster CdivdJ4*t�= INGTpy Westminster CA 92683 w Q s - Q F�OUNTY ca�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3�t�iL7•i �ii���ba ��FiE?Fi�?�?il!Ftlfi??•ssilf??ii!iFFFfSiS?�?IIFF?i?ifi?!i??S!iiS onnie Brockway, City Clerk City 9 of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk Act,- P.O. Box 190 Z. A untington Beach, CA 92648 L �Z0 'ABQ,� � r 0�� ` �-� 19541456 1 174 Gregory V & Carolyn E_Peterson 5082 Hampton Ct � INGrp�, (/r!� Westminster CA 92663 52 ,p pQ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Ss j '` Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 iuntington Beach, CA 92648 .. ...... 195 423 11 279 Mark Aurelius 5212'Victoria PI " i Westminster CA 92683 gTINGr 4 49 9.2 oIt II0. _ — - 9s�F NTY cA LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 3 � II4 Ill{?!I!ill,?{I??I???I ?t?Ill, Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk �' �. .'.�, nq P.O. Box 190 ��" r- �y`e c• �`'�':�s� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -1 V Pd �01 `or{y,�r,; ��e - _- essQ 195 18 15 � Robert A Isa ac c 14421 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 920647 f INGTp',� 0 NTI i I t LEGAL NOTICE - P BLIC HEARING -. "L �.cSi �?¢►�•�•�� ii `::::`: :li:::�: iit:�:II::::::�i�:ls:ii:::i:4::�i::::a!:!i Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach q '1 Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 213 15____ f 77m—on g 5772 Spa Drive �,- Huntington Beach CA 92647.-, ��UMTINGTp,�, R URN E.� EGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 095 020 12 346 095 020 13 347 145 014 02 348 UNITED ST TE F AMERICA UNITED STAT F AMERICA SOUTH COAST ATHLETIC CLUB IN n \ PO Box 948 ✓- M 1'f Sunset Beach CA 90742 145 01,1 21 3 9 �� 145 014 22 350 145 014 26 351 AR ��re*jt, RT D Cam' �' ARGOSY NERS LTD%B�UE C Fausto V Taddeo 7 R S Ll Su 15122 Bolsa Chica St Ranchos Verdes CA 90275 � ' S �j Huntington Beach CA 92649 c- qo -7 145 014 27 352 145 014 49 353 r 145 014 5 354 erzo S eor e Wilson—� Mari ler '�+ Pnnc re rince H g Brian G g -Jo 1 /c 91 8121 Katella Ave 9 Stan ton CA 90680 H on c ,-- 145 014 57 355 14501458 356 14501462 57 Bodh R Subherwal ✓�� GREENBROOK PROPERTIES CONFED N L SURANC 17042 Greentree Ln 4751 Wilshire Blvd #126 PO 510 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Los Angeles CA 90010 Atla a GA i48 145 014 63 358 145 014 64 145 016 04 60 �-- S & N COMPANY CRO V AkTME � 5422 Commercial Dr 4ff 0 qK �6 Huntington Beach CA 92649 vpor. e 0 T sin 145 016 05 361 fi -b 1m 6�G- C1 6j ` 5 016 08 36 Eugene B Zwick t/ Franc sk R; $03�'" Fred F r 16841 Edgewater Ln Sy 51 H Huntington Beach CA 92649 N-� e� g� b �S 3-) 10s 12,& 20b dA -a, Cam, 5'oz-3�— 145 016 09 364 145 016 10 365 145 016 11 366 FIBREFORM ELECTRONICS INC Ian & Betty Albert Sid Lance 5341 Argosy Ave �- 5302 Oceanus Dr 1� PO Box 691100 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Los Angeles CA 90069 145 016 12 367 � K; 145 016 13 68K�.! 145 016 14 369 Fred Fen •�, oa-�.v,,.a�a Fred Fens 'T'6Z, Kaino J Hamu . e 16061 Dominica Cir �4 Y - ao 9 Huntington Beach CA 92649 145 016 15 37 145 016 18 371 145 016 19 372 Guy C Tr t m 1�2 ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPERS Ian & Betty Albert PO B 1 30 0(�p 5160 Campus Dr .� 5322 Oceanus Dr Y Newport Beach CA 92660 Huntington Beach CA 92649 00, 145 016 20 373 14501 21 • 3 145 016 22 375 G & G DEVELOPMENT CO KE FIC IN TMENTS OCEANUS ASSOCIATES T�REE 3780 Parkview Dr �' a�J d't N� 2845 Mesa Verde Dr E"z-:r-t..5 Lakewood CA 90712 Costa Mesa CA 92626 Ci) —eQ 145 016 23,d4 376 145 016 24 377 145 016 25 378 Richard Joseph Paul �/ Richard Joseph Paul AMERICAN COOLING TOWER INC 639 Vista Valinda 639 Vista Valinda wl� 5442 Oceanus Dr#H San Clemente CA 92672 San Clemente CA 92672 Huntington Beach CA 92649 145 016 26 379 145 016 27 380 145 016 28 381 Maria De Lourdes Sob rsn RREEF-I -��vcotunp. RREEF- V I 5452 Oceanus Dr PO 497 PO B 7 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Su et each CA 90742i} Sunset Beach CA 90742 145 016 29 382 145 016 30 383 145 016 31 384 CENTURY DEVELOPMENT LTD REYNOLDS SERROT INDUSTRIAL Miramar Hawaii 15272 Bolsa Chica S! Dc�• 5401 Argosy Ave .i" PO Box 799 s% Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Monica CA 90406 145 361 02 385 145 361 03 386 145 361 04 387 Richard H L'heureux Sammy I Kuroda ,/ WERBCO CONSTRUCTION CORP 15021 Capetown Ln 15031 Capetown Ln 5410 Wilshire Blvd #512 ,�--- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90036 14536105 388 145 361 06 389 145 361 07 390 Linda Harding ✓ Edwin A Schmidt Jack S Odaka ,�-- 15051 Capetown Ln 15071 Capetown Ln 15081 Capetown Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 361 11 391 145 361 18 392 145 361 19 393 ORANGE CO FLOOD CONTR James C &Jacalyn L Wilton Alfonso &Van Huynh 6002 Thor Dr vim- 6012 Thor Dr �- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 361 20 394 145 3�� � 1 95 145 361 22 396 Dennis & Cristina Green Alle nk Linda C Elliott 6032 Thor Dr t/ 6042 %t? 6052 Thor Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 H ington ch CA 9264 q Huntington Beach CA 92647 1 to S 145 361 23 397 145 361 24 398 145 361 25 399 William F Conaway Richard Faulkner Edward J & Jill V Selby 6062 Thor Dr lam+ 6072 Thor Dr y' 6082 Thor Dr A-,- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 361 26 400 145 361 27 401 145 361 28 402 John A Hoetker William H Saia Sr. John Huang 6092 Thor Dr 6102 Thor Dr k— 6112 Thor Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 361 29 403 145 361 30 404 145 361 31 405 (j n William J Bartee Jr.� Stewart &-BeHmtfa Berkis RAW4*pl� GrangruthA a� 6111 Thor Dr 6101 Thor Dr A- / 6091 Thor Dr `-- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 r�,c Q 6D - s 145 361 32 406 145 361 33 407 145 361 34 408 DF-5 Forges Bernard Denis Des Toshiko Beech Robert Clark 6081 Thor Dr •— 6082 Atlas Dr 6092 Atlas Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 14536135 409 145 361 36 410 145 361 37 411 James A Reed John W Powell Gary E Opalewski�,; 6112 Atlas Dr 1� 15031 Sabre Ln Y 15021 Sabre Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 14536403 412 145 364 04 413 145 364 05 414 Dan M Barnes Robert F Wilton Robert Elvis Autry `- 6001 Thor Dr ►� 6011 Thor Dr 6031 Thor Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 364 06 415 145 364 07 416 145 364 08 417 Mary E Pangonis Byron J Tatti James L 8r6tmd&hrpe I Hill 12500 Nugent Dr 6051 Thor Dr 15071 Apollo Ln *-'-' Granada Hills CA 91344 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 14536409 418 145 364 10 419 145 364 11 420 Stanley Niitsuma -T Kenneth d-R*-q� LaConde Jr. Jerry L-&-Jo Yi Ferrera 15061 Apollo Ln 1- - 15051 Apollo Ln 1--- 15031 Apollo Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 364 12 421 145 364 13 422 145 364 14 423 Roger S Jue / Leroy Koyen Tamashiro Melton E Pratte 8381 Carnegie Ave 6071 Atlas Dr ✓— 6081 Atlas Dr A--,- Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 364 15 424 145 364 19 425 145 371 05 426 Merriman Staton Sholar 'TR Frederic W 84e�ra+se�6 Bush I Bobby Maurice Koob 3996 Mistral Dr 16621 Edgewater Ln 6111 Kimberly Dr A--- Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 371 06 427 r 145 371 07 428 145 371 08 429 Su- ' #0, bU J � �C Ricky S Cormany ,�-- 1 � (J 1\ 6 rr v 16161 Windemeir Ln 7 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 371 09 430 145 371 10 431 145 371 11 432 Steven A Swain Richard R Hamel Celia S McCreary 6071 Kimberly Dr V— 6061 Kimberly Dr` 6051 Kimberly Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 371 12 433 145 371 13 434 145 371 14 435 Maurice Valentin'TO, Frank R Wask Jr. Howard R Shiffletti 6031 Kimberly Dr - 6021 Kimberly Dr �- 6222 Kimberly Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 or�C- QP- S� ,�L r-d1 r-ZL 3 oo' - o o b 145 371 15 436 145 371 16 437 145 371 17 438 Albert G Wermich Vickie Dickson Margaret L Stephenson 6032 Kimberly Dr ✓� 6052 Kimberly Dr 6062 Kimberly Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 371 18 439 145 371 23 44 145 371 24 441 Calvert K M Wong vl� ORAN E UNTY FLOOD CONTR 6072 Kimberly Dr n ee Huntington Beach CA 92647 _un m eac 7 qo1 47 �7 145 521 14 442 145 531 03 443 145 531 04 444 VALACAL CO Nick Becker se ee PO Box 28606 15495 Graham St e�-�- Atlanta GA 30358 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ronar CA 92625 bQ 'C4 U� z3 � 145 531 05 445 145 531 24 446 145 3138 �7 f SAHAGEN FUND INC - CALIFORNIA FINEBLANKING CORP Nicholas F rah i5enedetto 5881 Engineer Dr ✓� 5803 Engineer Dr ✓- 2202 ron Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Santa Ana 704 t"�y�t t �,.Q.a�.r-o.�✓ 14553206 448 145 535 20 449 145 535 21 450 VON DER A E PARTNERS Thomas Adams Timothy & Pattie Miller 26440 eda#200 15701 Industry Ln 5872 Engineer Dr I Mis ejo CA 92691 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 145 536 25 451 145 537 01 452 145 542 05 453 Jere H Watson - / HEINZ INVESTMENTS INC Michael &4<-ay.Bagramian 5802 Engineer Dr 1/ 525 N Pine Way P/ 18909 Mount Cimarron St v Huntington Beach CA 92649 Anaheim CA 92805 Fountain Valley CA 92708 145 542 06 454 145 542 07 455 145 542e0856 Michael & Kay agramian - SewmeF,&Susan Franciosa Ttii• Allen n 18909 Marron St 612 Via Lido Nord Fou i alley CA 92708 Newport Beach CA 92663 9 d G N• Vh ji i IV 145 542 09 457 145 542 10 458 145 542 11 459 Allen Antoyan A;'go Antoyan 'f"� Samuel Franciosa T ti 868 N Main St - 5 r 612 Via Lido Nord ✓- Orange CA 92868 H eac Newport Beach CA 92663 14554212 460 145 542 15,It, 461 145 542 16 462 Samue Franciosa T g CONNECTICUT FINEBLANKING CO CO NNECTI UT FINEBLANKING CO 569 ngham Dr 25 Forest Pkwy — 25 F wy y` Huntington Beach CA 92649 Shelton CT 06484 Sh on T 06484 �- 145 542 17 IP;;41, 1415,54218 464 j145542 19 65 James R C�-. VON DER AHE PARTNERS 26440 La Alameda#200 Mission Viejo CA 92691 14 ; Y 7 C 060' 145 542 20 466 145 542 21 467 145 542 22 468 Djordje &Jelena Drndarski ac �� Haw Jye& Chuen Fang Yang 1821 Riverford Rd ,i— 16111 Jenner St *---- Tustin CA 92780 AH ' ' Westminster CA 92683 S. 0.ca '► 2 5 t �.,.Qa 2. 145 542 23 469 145 542 24 470 145 542 25 471 Millard K Boldman 'Z N August Petracy TRON DEVELOPMENT CO 24884 Jim Bridger Rd ✓ 5542 Buckingham Dr `� 3332 Venture Dr Calabasas CA 91302 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 145 542 26 472 145 543 f 47 145 543 02 474 Derek W Loft vim _ Dallas E*- -Weaver 5801 Grimsby Dr 5 7g 8152 Evelyne Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 '' 49 Huntington Beach CA 92646 (,la 13 a..ls, WTI R 7 R � p0GOY5,oytoo 14554303 475 145 543 0 �i1/ 4 14554305Robert -G 477 Millard Boldman"T tt- Robert&-9tie Boswell 24884 Jim Bridger Rd / 5662 Engineer Dr ✓' San Diego CA 92132 H �9 Huntington Beach CA 92649 LI 145 543 06 478 145 543 07 479 195 011 05 480 Laurence P Feeley John Lynch Gertrude Leona McPhail 5702 Engineer Dr 11 . 17093 Westport Dr 6061 Glenwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 011 06 481 195 011 07 482 195 011 08 483 Gary A Greenberg Rosendo Rodriguez Jeffrey&iReme Peth 3442 Windspun Dr 6081 Glenwood Dr 6091 Glenwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 011 09 484 195 011 10 485 195 011 11 486 Harvey M Bott James Morrison Carl Gilman 5782 Bellfield Ln 6111 Glenwood Dr ` 5701 Middlecoff Dr Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 195 011 12 487 195 011 13 488 195 011 14 489 Michael E &-l4aUie"-10 McLaughlin Claus G Heins Steven K Vance 6131 Glenwood Dr &--- 6141 Glenwood Dr 6151 Glenwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 011 15 490 195 011 16 491 195 011 17 492 Frank Jacinto James Goldsworthy Margaret Hagopian 6171 Glenwood Dr 6181 Glenwood Dr ✓ 5594 Myrtle Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Long Beach CA 90805 195 W 493 195 012 06 494 195 012 07 495 Haihoeb Wand. Joseph B Fulton ✓ RobertsatrStanley p 6072 Glenwood Dr 6082 Glenwood Dr Chat t CA 9'131 n�_" Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 E' - SIP, G'1 C Q 300'-l000' 195 012 08 496 195 012 09 '097 195 0 2Wz�zq- -C 498 Charlie ete Lundstrom Davi 6092 Glenwood Dr "y 55 D��JJ'a,,��o��n�# 1 �c i A 92(47 Huntington Beach CA 92647 DiamorWF r CA 91765 Nc , {�tz� �} SfRFEcT -1- i ,c� 4 S • t'-cJ c a t -o-a�-�"• 1 r 9 N-3r-srIjw Y04 11 C� r &� 195 012 13 501 195 012 11 499 195 012 12 �500 Ted Thuc Nguyen Ronnie C Luplow Edward W Nesselroad 6091 Hardwick Cir �,. 6081 Hardwick Cir 730 Saint James PI Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Newport Beach CA 92663 195 012 14 502 195 012 23 503 195 012 24 504 Edward L Sheret Jr. Glenn C A49tarla Jean Harchut Benjamin D Lucio 6061 Hardwick Cir 6062 Hardwick Cir '--- 6072 Hardwick Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 012 25 505 195 012 26 506 195 012 27 507 J F Balogh La Von Phelps Keith H Sharpe 6082 Hardwick Cir ` 13295 Ivanpah Rd - 16722 Intrepid Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Apple Valley CA 92308 Huntington Beach CA 92649 195 013 01 508 OK- 195 013 02 509 195 013 03 510 Kevin A James, &A IF Al 4 A m G: 1 Willis C Nearhood Michel A Girgis 14652 Edgeview Ln 14642 Edgeview Ln 14632 Edgeview, Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 013 04 511 195 013 05 512 195 013 06 513 INGE REALTY COMPANY Michaele Gray Susan Jaragosky ✓ 12461 Harbor Blvd �'— 14612 Edgeview Ln `� 14602 Edgeview, Ln Garden Grove CA 92840 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19501307 514 195 013 08 515 195 013 09 516 Joe B Pulliam John Crawford ✓— Bruce G Rehse 14601 Shinkle Cir P--- 14611 Shinkle Cir 14621 Shinkle Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19501310 517 19501311 518 19501312 519 Robert H &444ep4a D Baskins Jesse L Moore Alexis Clemente 14631 Shinkle Cir ✓'-- 14641 Shinkle Cir 14651 Shinkle Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 013 13 520 195 013 14 521 195 013 15 522 Kevin &--ise Smith �.. Stephen G Davidson James Lynn &-Masgafet Wenrick 14652 Shinkle Cir 14642 Shinkle Cir 14632 Shinkle Cir. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 013 16 523 195 013 17 524 195 013 18 525 Oliver O Farley Clifford L Glathar Penny Jean &-Si.sy Kohler 14622 Shinkle Cir 14612 Shinkle Cir t� 14602 Shinkle Cir / Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 l� 1 e?, 300` - ioaa ' C) !� 195 013 19 526 195 013 20 527 195 013 21 528 Kevin &-G+md�McVey Robert A Deets Daniel P Vessey 14601 Chalet Ln 14611 Chalet Ln 14621 Chalet Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 013 22 529 195 013 23 530 195 031 01 531 Carl Lee Pierce Halim H Shenouda Russell-&'te'sfre Rudeseal 14631 Chalet Ln 14641 Chalet Ln v 6101 Ivory Cir — Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 02 532 195 031 03 533� 195 031 04 534 Robert R Timmer ay Steve&-Beaune Evans 6091 Ivory Cir 6VS- , w- Q 6071 Ivory Cir =--' Huntington Beach CA 92647 47 Huntington Beach CA 92647 o fox- $19 q�lU3 rn,ridGAtI Nv g 195 031 05 535 195 031 14 536 195 031 15 537 9 Brian�&'Ginzr Fick Sylvain Eourcy Jerry McCormick 6061 Ivory Cir 6062 Ivory Cir 6072 Ivory Cir j Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 16 538, A 195 031 17 539 195 031 18 540 David A ob d !" John A&4aa44s+a-&Miller Son Nhut Lam 6092 Ivory Cir 6102 Ivory Cir 7 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 q 4 5-53 195 031 19 541 195 031 20 542 195 031 21 543 Walter visa Moss Lola F Norton -T I& Harry Junior Carlson TR 6101 Jade Cir `"-- 16361 Silver Ln --- 17921 Oldglen Ln ...- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 1950312 544 195 031 23 545 195 031 32 546 �eet�r CJ haq Judith G Parker Michael J Smith 6071 Jade Cir 5 o Eu 2 6061 Jade Cir 6062 Jade Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 i 195 031 33 547 195 031 34 548 195 03 1 35 549 David A e pi-;=Smith Dave &-A iie Bartlett Family Trust Sundstedt� 6072 Jade Cir '�- 6082 Jade Cir 5362 Glenstone Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 195 031 36 550 195 031 37 551 195 031 38 552 Luis Vazquez Thomas E Faron John E Dickerson��y 6102 Jade Cir 6101 Kelsey Cir 1-1 .R? i Box Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Ames IA 50010 195 031 39 553 195 031 40 554 195 031 41 555 Larry Brockett �' Hassan Jamalzadeh Craig S Parker 6081 Kelsey Cir 6071 Kelsey Cir 6061 Kelsey Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 rn C 13 P - S r� /44�t 30a '- ! C)� 195 031 50 556 195 031 51 557 195 031 52 558 David A &--q � Manley Bruce Y Numata Larry Rosen d 6062 Kelsey Cir i 6072 Kelsey Cir "� 6082 Kelsey Cir✓ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 t 195 031 53 559 195 031 54 560 l 195 031 55 561 � Gaylon J DeVries -�o `A p�-+-kKang '� Donald M Platt ,! 6092 Kelsey Cir 6102 Kelsey Cir 6101 Larchwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 56 562 195 031 57 563 195 031 58 564 Madelyn S Payne / Raymond P Crehin Frits A Weers �— 1130 NOrange Ave ✓ 6081 Larchwood Dr 6071 Larchwood Dr Azusa CA 91702 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 05109 567 � 195 031 59 565 195 051 08 566 Liem &-Bee Nguyen ✓ Michael J Pinkus � John 8: Baugh 6061 Larchwood Dr 6062 Larchwood Dr 6072 Larchwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 10 568 195 051 11 569 195 051 12 570 John R Babich / Antoinette Young Kenneth Y Lin ✓' 6 082 Larchwood Dr 6092 Larchwood Dr r 6821 Scenic Bay Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 195 051 13 571 195 051 14 572 195 051 15 573 Esther4 iM Nq U K E'N Dennis &-6-yf+ria Morris arcT 6122 Larchwood Dr 6132 Larchwood Dr Hun ' n ea h CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 1 uul -1 4.(�_ C y9 195 5116 574 195 051 17 575 195 051 18 576 Robert Trout BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA INC James M Collinsworth 14831 Northridge Cir PO Box 857 14851 Northridge Cir r Huntington Beach CA 92647 Glendora CA 91740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 19 577 195 051 20 578 195 051 21 579 Roberti Paulsen Allen &-La&Ue Calkins James W Wilson r 14861 Northridge Cir 14871 Northridge Cir 14881 Northridge Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 22 580 195 051 23 581 195 051 24 582 David &+v&"Foster Eliseo S Roman ✓ Randolph M Vargas 14891 Northridge Cir 14901 Northridge Cir 14911 Northridge Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 �n 195 051 25 583 1 95 051 26 584 195 051 27 585 z .Y+r Arthudzs Gonzales Jr. Mary J Rankin Terry C Workman 14931 Northridge Cir 14941 Northridge Cir 14951 Northridge Cir' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 a2, ,. ,,::t 306--10o0' e.-Pa- 195 051 29 586 195 051 30 587 195 051 31 588 Lance G Cohen ,/� Gregory Howard Benedict Sheppard Kevin&-Gw-r+e Daly 14952 Northridge Cir 14942 Northridge Cir "'' 14932 Northridge Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19505132 589 195 051 33 590 195 051 34 591 Wagih H Marcos Peter Duong ✓ Collin Simons r 14912 Northridge Cir ✓� 14902 Northridge Cir 14892 Northridge Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 35 592 195 051 36 593 195 051 37 594 Raymond Wu •,�- Dean J Schuyler X R Darwin Ray Watkins ti 21254 Stockton Pass Rd 14872 Northridge Cir 14871 Oaktree Cir Walnut CA 91789 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 38 595 195 051 39 596 195 051 40 597 Robert M Stimmler Richard H Harenburg Lucille R Tarvis - - 14881 Oaktree Cir 14891 Oaktree Cir 'f 14901 Oaktree Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19505141 598 195 051 42 599 195 Oa7,43 600 Kathy L Tackett ,/ Leo T S Wang Jack y Derks 14911 Oaktree Cir 7222 Carlton Ave '� 14941 Oaktree Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 44 601 195 051 61 602 19505162 603 Richard H Harenburg Joyce Watkins Richard A Benninger4, 14891 Oaktree Cir `',I 6061 Cortez Dr v 6071 Cortez Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 63 604 195 051 64 605 195 051 65 606 Richard R Cole "T ti Kevin Klepfer Leigh Snyder ✓ 3149 Madeira Ave - 14862 Vanguard Ln `� 14872 Vanguard Ln Costa Mesa CA 92626 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 66 607 195 051 67 608 195 051 68 609 Aiden Naughton Maryann Campbell Charles Dennis Daniels T 2 14882 Vanguard Ln 14892 Vanguard Ln 14891 Sabre Ln --- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 0-1- 195 051 69 610 195 051 70 611 195 051 71 612 Ethel Lipetz Andrew Wight t o K•Q2t,r.- Douglas O White -'T ti 14881 Sabre Ln 14871 Sabre Ln 14861 Sabre Ln .-- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 72 613 195 051 73 614 195 051 74 --j5j5 Paul A Flynn i k Gary L Ferguson Edward Crain � -15d 14851 Sabre Ln 14842 Sabre Ln '� 14852 Sabre Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647- 6( M C Q P— Sip 3 oob' 195 051 75 616 195 051 76 617 195 051 77 618 Ronald Hamelin Joseph &-MQ4gafe4 Polance Gregory J Buchanan 14862 Sabre Ln 14872 Sabre Ln 16811 Kamalii Dr A--- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 195 051 78 619 195 051 79 620 195 051 80 621 Alex Yuan - Dale M Davis Michael John Peter 14892 Sabre Ln 14902 Sabre Ln 14912 Sabre Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 81 622 195 051 82 623 195 051 83 624 Charlie &rJ.a.c44ie Nguyen, James Jay &-6awQ-A" Wise Robert S Chen 14922 Sabre Ln 14942 Sabre Ln 14952 Sabre Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 84 625 195-0-52-64 626 195 052 02 627 Melvin &duli Hayes C Joyce O'Connell ✓ 14972 Sabre Ln ' \ 6192 Larchwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 346 Huntington Beach CA 92647 i-qt'(b q S V►CFS �� � 195 052 11 628 195 052 12 4{���9 195 053 10 630 Joan Jeanette Hoffman / Paul M Bieber Thomas H Thornell .e-tc L 6191 Mar Vista Dr Y 6171 Mar Vista Dr 6082 Sherman Dr `- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 053 11 631 195 053 12 632 195 053 13 633 Curtis F Turrill Jr. Lawrence N Martin �— Richard L Harris 6092 Sherman Dr 14911 Sabre Ln 14921 Sabre Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 053 14 634 195 053 15 635 195 053 16 636 Livin D Prabhu Roger Huddleston Perry.�c Bogdan 14941 Sabre Ln 14951 Sabre Ln Y 14971 Sabre Ln ' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 071 07 637 195 071 08 638 195 071 09 639 Max.&-Briar Joseph Leonard Fu-Yuen Chen Billy P Brisby v. 6071 Anacapa Dr - 11311 La Rosa Dr ✓` 6051 Anacapa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Arcadia CA 91006 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 071 10 640 195 071 11 641 195 071 12 C 62 Frank Ngoc Vu •v---- William G Byers William Uddh1 olm & a -Boyd Cool 6031 Anacapa Dr 6021 Anacapa Dr 14351 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 071 13 643 195 071 14 �44 195 071 15 645 Henry J Walker James Thua Nguye Ronald J P-Irkin T q 14112 Hereford St 10394 Morning Glory'Ave 14391 Chateau Ln Westminster CA 92683 Fountain Walley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 (r)C B P- S? 300 oco' 195 071 16 646 195 071 17 647 195 071 18 648 William Iwanyshyr Annette MacNeil Lyle Bradley &- --- 14401 Chateau Ln 14411 Chateau Ln Ll� 14421 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 071 19 649 195 071 20 650 195 071 21 651 Lance K Ewing Vincent F Urbano ✓ Jay Michael Engesath 14431 Chateau Ln 14441 Chateau Ln 14461 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 071 22 652 195 072 03 653 195 072 04 654 Dennis E Williams ✓ Steven &-K+ rlvrly Sanchez Gerald C Stickel 14471 Chateau Ln 6122 Anacapa Dr .� 6112 Anacapa Dr ✓ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 05 655 195 072 06 656 195 072 07 657 Janice R Ambrose -T (4• Timothy McDonald David Hagan 324 10th St 6092 Anacapa Dr 309 W Bo4der PI Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Chandler AZ 85224 . 195 072 08 658 195 072 09 659 195 072 10 660 David Perko Noemi DeLeonponce Roger Samuel &-Juli•e Rose 6072 Anacapa Dr 6062 Anacapa Dr 6042 Anacapa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 11 661 195 072 12 662 195 072 13 663 Xoi Van LY DavidJohn ohn Griffis Dennis A Pine 14392 Chateau Ln '� 5958 Westminster Blvd "r 14412 Chateau Ln Y� Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 15 665 195 072 1� 666 195 072 14 664 �y,, q Manuel D Ramirez David M Reynolds e4p`i 14422 Chateau Ln 14432 Chateau Ln ✓- 14442 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19507217 667 1�95�2 8 ' 668 ! 195 072 20 669 Gerald W 804a*y-d�Glover 1 R Marinus Myer 14462 C �- hateau Ln 14472 Chateau Ln 14502 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 21 670 195 072 23 671 195 072 24 672 Ivan R Nickle ✓ Stephen W &-*&6Rg Chu Peter J Pappas 14501 Danes Cir 14471 Danes Cir 14461 Danes Cir `�- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 25 673 195 072 26 674 195 072 27 675 Su-Ling Hong John o Fukushima Joseph J Vicic �- 1 14431 Danes Cir PO Box 507 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Sunset Beach CA 90742 `(4NI SR 6Y7 G� S -?rn� 366 - rood 1 OJ- 195 072 28 676 195 072 29 677 195 072 30 678 ,Franees-{Vl k Cku, Daniel D &-Ka"leA She Isenberg Antonio Quaresma 14411 Danes Cir 14401 Danes Cir 14391 Danes Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 31 679 195 072 32 680 195 072 33 681 Robert Gene&-1—k-1tak�Evans Gerald A Roark Irwin J Aden 8 1 221 Wharton St 14412 Danes Cir �_ 14422 Danes Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 34 682 195 072 35 683 195 072 36 684 Barbara H Loveland T R Gersl-& Marilyn Smith Gerald B Corley 4 Elk Glen Dr 14442 Danes Cir 14462 Danes Cir r 9e CA 92869 Orange Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 37 685 195 072 39 686 195 072 40 687 John Phu&-L4y-Hue Nguyen OL Douglas Bonde Engum A J ,& Gafal Mims 1 t�2 Battes-Cir 17101 Westport Dr ✓� 14501 Elmhurst Cir 7 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 42 688 195 072 43 689 195 072 44 690 Stephen Nerio Son Vu ✓ Luis A Paladines �- 14471 Elmhurst Cir �_ 14461 Elmhurst Cir 14441 Elmhurst Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 45 691 195 072 46 692 195 072 47 693 John Garza Mark 44�� Day David J-&-Etr a Kranz 14431 Elmhurst Cir !i 14421 Elmhurst Cir 14411 Elmhurst Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 48 694 195 072 49 695 195 072 50 696 Harald Dett George Gipe Alfred W Whitcomb TR 14401 Eatnhurst Cir v 14391 Qmhurst Cir 14402 Elmhurst Cir Huntinaton Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 51 697 195 072 52 698 195 072 53 699 Walter R Stewart TR - Anthony &-KURbQ4y Drozdowski Steven Q4efA4er Russick 7966 Moonmist Cir ' 14422 Elmhurst Cir 14432 Elmhurst Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 54 700 195 072 55 701 195 072 56 702 Dale R Powers Perry J Grant Robert L Rothfuss 14442 Elmhurst Cir 14462 Elmhurst Cir 14472 Elmhurst Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 072 58 703 195 072 69 704 195 072 70 705 David W Pettner Carlos E Garcia 0( Chuck & Weller 9832 Lapworth Cir 14482 Elmhurst Cir 14481 Elmhurst Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 r"-t 306,- r 000' -b- �c u ►.,fig- --1 R 195 072 71 706 195 072 72 707 195 072 73 708 Joseph R Stripling Sr. - Lawrence Steen Mark Huang 14482 Danes Cir 14481 Danes Cir 14482 Chateau Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 073 01 709 195 073 02 71Q �� 195 073 03 711 Almon D Fackrell �- Florence Campbell/9"�° James D &-Dofe+hy-®White 6142 Briarcliff Dr 6132 Briarcliff Dr 6122 Briarcliff Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 70ARyH IC0N0 (011) 195 073 04 712 195 073 05 713 /� 195 073 06 714 ,✓ PA 4a,p.w4A-T4mye Morgan —4 Michael James & Dale N Garey Jeff&Janine Tetiva 6112 Briarcliff Dr 6102 Briarcliff Dr 6092 Briarcliff Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 073 07 715 ,' 195 073 08 716J� n� 195 073 09 717 Douglas A Bender EMPRESS HOMES INC Richard J & Esther Z Arvesen 6082 Briarcliff Dr 6303 Wilshire Blvd a#n Rvfa Pj w,,` 6DL Bxiafc-tiff Dr- `-Y7,A Phckft Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90048 Hu.niiagiop Beach CA 92647 195 081 12 718 t- 195 081 13 719 t, 195 081 14 720 Larry Leiker Anthony Totah Michael P Wilson v 12746 Laurel Oak Rd 14462 Fairview Ln 14472 Fairview Ln Victorville CA 92392 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 081 15 721 195 081 16 722 195 081 34 723 Walter L Turek Robert J Hoffman ✓ David & Sonia McKerr 485 E 17th St#202 6201 Briarcliff Dr 6202 Briarcliff Dr Costa Mesa CA 92627 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 081 35 724 ✓ 195 081 36 725 195 081 37 726 Robert Bruce &Jessie Rose Holmes Dieter J Foertsch ✓ Dieter J Foertsch 6192 Briarcliff Dr 6172 Briarcliff Dr 6172 Briarcliff Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 081 38 727 195 082 O�� t� <�s j 195 082 04 729 Greg Charles Steinhaus '� E Jo 0r� Vav l rlcQ'n0 William George& Teri P Matheny 6152 Briarcliff Dr 1 1 Fairvi IIS3 ,? 14411 Fairview Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 HuntVM Beach CA 92647 �v cl ? Fs_ Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 082 05 730 ;,/ 195 082 06 731/ 195 082 07 732 Lily Valverde Gregory D Coffey SHEPARD HOMES INC 14421 Fairview Ln 14431 Fairview Ln 6303 Wilshire Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA�-9,-�2�647 Los Angeles CA 90048 Dow 6f"`��", 195082080 73 195 082 09„ -�Vl 73 1t` WO-4 195 082 11 735 Jimmykf re J so Da e���l,� s �L4 � Jon & Karen Embser 14461ai Ln 1 �Fai���} �t°a 14501 Fairview Ln Huntingto Beach CA 92647 Huntingtdlh'Beach CA 926473 ' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Ij rat, 300' — i 000' e-I& 19517222 766 195 181 01 767 ✓ 195 181 02 ti/ 768 Leo E Swank James R Setzler Jess Gonzales 14215 Barber St 14201 Graham St 14221 Graham St Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 181 03 769 19518104 770,% 195 181 05 771 Susan Haller Robert C Pollock Marlin A Fowles 14231 Graham St 5052 Cheryl Dr 5451 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 181 06 772 195 181 07 773 ✓ 195 181 08 � 74 tit 35-1 Antoine Guglielmi Hiep & Hali Thanh Pham Edwar Rie /ado LH 5441 Harold Dr 5431 Harold Dr 795 'rfall :�� H 6 C93� 7- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Hu ingtorach CA 92648 «/ 195 182 01 775 ✓ 195 182 02 776 ✓ 195 182 03 _- 777 Anthony R & Madeleine M Pacini Sr. Dudley & Trudy Herman Michael & Exaltacion O Tighe 5492 Harold Dr 5472 Harold Dr 5452 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19518204 778 " 195 182 05 779 ✓ 195 182 06 780 John C &Susan P Ridgway Jr. Scott B Gruber Ronald Pascual 5442 Harold Dr 5432 Harold Dr 5422 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19518210 781 19518211 782 19518212 783 Robert& Helen Cloyd Vincent E&Kenneth E Harvey Roland Reiswig 5431 Stardust Dr 6402 W Flower St 5461 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Phoenix AZ 85033 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 182 13 784 195 183 01 785 195 183 02 786 Alexander H Dutch Joseph P Courtney `' Robert W Lorentz V 5481 Stardust Dr 5482 Stardust Dr 5462 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 183 03 787 ✓ 195 183 07 788 195 183 08 789 Scott Harper Randolph J Scott f Ted Tiegen y, 5452 Stardust Dr 5471 Tangiers Dr 5481 Tangiers Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19518401 790 195 191 01 791 v 195 191 02 ✓ 792 Thomas S &Jenny J Lee Richard & Sheryl Winget John Fugatt 5502 Tangiers Dr 14301 Riviera Dr 14311 Riviera Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519103 793 19519104 794 19519105 795 Vincent Keith Chapman '� Russell & Robin Plotnik Thomas V Grantham 14321 Riviera Dr 14331 Riviera Dr 14341 Riviera Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 ?7 ` 1 .2n-4! r Sod'-I Dom' 19519106 796 19519107 797 19519108 798 Dennis A Lascola Alfred L Berger '� Gaylene Stoner 14351 Riviera Dr 14361 Riviera Dr 14371 Riviera Dr V1 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519109 799 19519110 800 19519111 801 Fereidoon Joulharzadeh Cesar& Norma Correa Fredric O Pierce 5612 Riviera Dr 5611 Nevada Dr 5601 Nevada Dr v Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519112 802 19519113 803 19519114 804 Ingrida Friedel Carlyle A Kennerson John R Burke 8691 Bishop Ave 5571 Nevada Dr 14372 Nevada Dr Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519115 805 19519116 806 19519117 807 Peter B Calvert v Kenneth R Gaudette ✓ Yun C Kwo 14362 Nevada Dr 14352 Nevada Dr 18064 S 3rd St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 19519118 808 19519119 809 19519120 810 Gloria D Hoff ;/ Robert F Leitch V1, Steven D Schoenberger 14332 Nevada Dr 14884 Rossmoyne Dr 14312 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 San Jose CA 95124 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 191 21 811 195 192 02 812 195 192 03 813 Helen D Curnutt , Marshall L Iwason Paul & Julei Flynn v. 14302 Nevada Dr 5612 Harold Dr ✓ 5602 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 192 04 814 v 195 192 05 815 U-- 195 192 06 816 Johnna L Gott Abelardo Ramos Joseph S & Cathleen M Butcher v 5592 Harold Dr 1241 N Walden Ln 5572 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Anaheim CA 92807 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 192 07 17 `� 195 192 08 818 195 192 09 819 NOGUERA Y D N Patricia Lozowski �' Victor Muro 5552 I D'r�� 421 Country Club Rd 5532 Harold Dr v H ington iq h CA 92647 Hood River OR 97031 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519210 820 19519211 821 19519212 822 Marie Antoinette Van Der Upwich Roy Anthony Hodak ✓ Catherine Ann Sowma 17762 San Doval Ln 5512 Harold Dr 5502 Harold Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519213 823 19519214 824 19519215 825 Paul F DePina Willie L A Boudevin Sam Morreal 5501 Stardust Dr 720 Carmel Ave 5521 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 hJ (Y)CQP- s V0 t\ —D 00 mod' 0-1-j- 195 194 10 856 195 195 01 857 195 195 02 858 David A Sukla Donald E Mabe Jr. v Wilbert D Smith 5561 Dollar Dr 5622 Nevada Dr 8212 20th St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 195 195 03 859 195 195 04 860 195 195 05 861 Michael & Corinne Hoffman ✓ Chan Van Nguyen Hugh McDonnell 5602 Nevada Dr 6531 Glen Dr 5582 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 195 06 862 ,- 195 195 07 863 195 195 08 864 Bruce Rasch Robert C Roos ti Thomas Gherardini 5572 Nevada Dr 5562 Dollar Dr 5552 Dollar Dr z Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 202 01 865 195 202 02 866 195 202 03 867 Thomas W Smith Edward E Willenborg ✓ Dinh Gia Tran 5392 Saint Marys Cir 14312 Riviera Dr 14322 Riviera Dr Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 202 04 868 195 202 05 869 195 202 06 870 Tony C Garcia ✓ Larry R Sarver `—" Curtis Platt v-- 14332 Riviera Dr 14342 Riviera Dr 14352 Riviera Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 202 07 871 195,202 08 140 87 ,K ^} 195 202 09 873 Eric & D Colbert t� Wi li `' Byron T& Lisbeth S Robinson 5631 Riviera Dr 1y "Elli�}t��I 9351 Mokihana Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Hunting each CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 _..., v c) 1 1952021 1 �t�. 874 `jj�i prat 195 202 11 875 v 195 202 12 876 Angel g ha �' Efren & Olivia Hernandez Luis Alberto & Leticia Gonzalez 5661 1 ie r C v, c`?L fi+ 5681 Riviera Dr 5691 Riviera Dr Hun ing Beac A 92647c,,103 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 202 13 877 L.. 195 202 14 878 195 202 15 879 Maria L Groen Jose B Acevedo �-' NESTOR HOMES INC q,sv#vlk 5701 Riviera Dr 14371 Hammon Ln 6303 Wilshire Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90048- 195 202 16 880 195 202 17 881 195 202 18 882 John Robert Molitor Larry G Coshow Toro Albert Dely 14351 Hammon Ln 14341 Hammon Ln 16702 Glass Mountain St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 195 202 23 883 / 195 202 195 202 25 ;j 885 ki— George Van Groeningen To Oeho adi 4� John Sileski 14322 Thunderbird Cir 1432 T er ird Cir , 14342 Thunderbird Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntin on Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 3 c�, — SP 195 202 26 886 195 202 27 887 195 202 28 888 Vernon E Hendrickson Edward J Lambert " Hisao Sugimae 24101 Basin Harbor Ct 17872 Shoreham Ln 14351 Thunderbird Cir Tehachapi CA 93561 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 202 29 889 195 202 30 89�,, 195 202 31 1--- 891 Robert H Liu '� Richard S Lee Robert A Van Leeuwen 14341 Thunderbird Cir 6531 Woodside Cir 14321 Thunderbird Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 C c 195 202 32 892 195 203 08 3 � 1 � 195 203 09 894 Dennis W Vannote �' Micha �A I�,2`�r`N Eduard Hermann �. 14311 Thunderbird Cir 143 F+4�'fiimo u�x5�(1r 14342 Hammon Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Hu ingt PGhCA 9264�� Oot,%j Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 203 10 895 195 203 11 896 195 203 12 897 Mark K Nguyen John Wardle Duc Minh & My-Van Thi Ngo +- 14352 Hammon Ln 14351 Hacienda Dr 14341 Hacienda Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 203 13 898 195 204 10�_/ 8 195 204 11 900 Arthur Bradford Na 1 {r Audrey S Lair 14331 Hacienda Dr 1 Haq*a Dr 14332 Hacienda Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 204 12 901 195 204 13 902 195 204 14 903 Cheryl R & Robert A Johnson Charles E Nolen ✓ Robert M Welch 5781 Sands Dr 5791 Sands Dr 713 Bartolo Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Montebello CA 90640 195 204 15 904 195 204 16RtS 195 205 01 906 Donna Lynn Wold ✓ Jerr�Y n ,�� � ulf Paul L Tuzzolino ✓ 14331 Tropicana Ln 4NfiPin o a Ln P.)�I 14322 Tropicana Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 gt�each CA 92647 } � Huntington Beach CA 92647 6" 195 205 02 907 195 205 03 908 195 205 04 909 Stephen R Stewart David Bertelsen ✓ Douglas C Hales 4164 Maritime Rd 9720 Arvilla Ave NE 14352 Tropicana Ln Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 Albuquerque NM 87111 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 205 05 910 195 205 06 911 195 205 07 912 Georg Christa Thomas Pineda ''� John A Scharf 10245 Virginia Ave �5� 14341 Calneva Ln 14331 Calneva Ln South Gate CA 90280 �/ 1 �' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 205 08j;Watt 5�A � r,S 195 211 01 914 ✓ 195 211 02 915 V Lar Yyj�6?A 8�rrLarry }�- 11\ Peter N H & Herlinda Hollingsworth Todd B &Jessica C Jones 14321 C a Ln 5622 Riviera Dr 5632 Riviera Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 0 r,4 as 195 211 03 16 ��-. � �' 195 211 04 917 �4�� 195 211 05 918 �, ' " 5642 hi i�ie�r��r I� ��a���� 5652 Riviera Dr an 117698ASan Diego Cir Sunbury Hun n t�W"Seach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valle CA 92708 9 9 Y 195 211 06 919 195 211 07 920 19521108 21 George E Partridge ✓ Sei Yamada CharIe & y E 5682 Riviera Dr 5692 Riviera Dr 2599 nut 1 aL Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Sin I Hill CA' 90806 9 9 195 211 09 922 195 211 10 923 195 211 11 924 Edmundo M & Maria Lopez Jonathon M Harrison Melvin R Norton 5701 Nevada Dr 5691 Nevada Dr 5681 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 211 12 925 195 211 13 926 195 211 14 927 Terrance A Fulford ✓ Dana S McDown v� Paul F Lambach Jr. v 5671 Nevada Dr 5661 Nevada Dr 5641 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Yy 195 211 15 928 195 211 16 929 195 212 01 930 A Riccardo DeAngelis Dorothy E Ghetti ` David B & Nancy Harris,,,�b 5631 Nevada Dr 5621 Nevada Dr 5632 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 212 02 931 195 212 03 932 195 212 04 933 Raymond J Shaeffer Gerry& Maricela Serrano Robert L Honeycutt �- 5642 Nevada Dr 5652 Nevada Dr 5662 Nevada Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 212 05 934 L 195 212 06 935 195 212 07 936 Songsri Beall Mak Jalili Lily Valverde 5672 Nevada Dr 5682 Nevada Dr 14421 Fairview Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 212 08 937 195 214 13 938 195 214 14 939 Michael G &Virginia M Mette Olger Otazu John M Arredondo t/ 5702 Nevada Dr 14471 Calneva Ln 14461 Calneva Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 (,� Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 214 19 "(ODD i� 195 214 16 941 i% 195 214 17 L-'"942 �r uPowski"', f ti,o �d�`, Sven & Kathleen Sanburg Vincent N Scandone Jr. -14441 I n 11a � 14431 Calneva Ln 14421 Calneva Ln HuntigMon Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 214 18 943 195 214 19 94� 195 214 20 945 - Frank H Tsai Dan Graesser Chuong Hung Duong 18313 Clarkdale Ave 14391 Calneva Ln 14381 Calneva Ln Artesia CA 90701 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Z-A ..Q rn� rie;C 3a o I- 1 O ob' 195 214 21 946 195 214 22 947 19521423 8 Keith Jaskot v Lucy Sec, �— SCHOOL WE INSTER DIST 14371 Calneva Ln 14361 Calneva Ln 1412 ood St ✓" Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 We ins er CA 92683 195 223 01 949 195 223 02 950 195 223 03 951 Setsuo Sakagami Mohammad Seighali Guy L & Brenda L Barker .. 5962 Chinook Dr 5952 Chinook Dr 5942 Chinook Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 04 952 195 223 05 953 aP 195 223 06 954 L G Vigie UIIII irwyn oo� Tai K& Oanh Vuong 5932 Chinook Dr � � \x$ 5902 Chinook Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 tin on B IchCA 92647gpy't� Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 07 955 195 223 08 956 195 223 09 957 David A & Linda J Boucher v Howard E Jones :- Ernest C Mason — 5892 Chinook Dr 5882 Chinook Dr 5872 Chinook Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 10 958 195 223 11 959 195 223 12 960 Foreman B Lawson _ Dee Martin ` ' Craig Griffin k--- 5871 San Souci Cir 5881 San Souci Cir 5891 San Souci Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 13 961 195 223 14 962 195 223 15 963 Eldon & Janice Van Dyke Richard L LaFrance John L & Mary Jane Piersma 5901 San Souci Cir 5922 San Souci Cir 5931 San Souci Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 16 964 195 223 17 965 195 223 18 966 Walter S Jones ✓ Jeffrey W& Deborah M Alcock l— Edward G Kalac U 10082 Decima Dr 5961 San Souci Cir 6462 Longford Cir Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 19 967 195 223 20 968 195 223 21 969 Audrey Maratta _ Charles H Williams Sr. Michael J Black t/ 5972 San Souci Cir 5962 San Souci Cir `� 5942 San Souci Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 22 970 195 223 23 971 195 223 24 972 Martin F & Kim Hamrock Richard L LaFrance �. Sue A Salmons t 5932 San Souci Cir 5922 San Souci Cir 5902 San Souci Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 25 973 195 223 26 974 195 223 27 975 Mark& David Hayes U' James H Strom V Monica Razo _V 5892 San Souci Cir 5882 San Souci Cir 5872 San Souci Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 3-3 (Yl C) f-.Q A.1- 300' - 1 oda' 19519216 826 19519217 827 19519218 828 Michael Strenk ✓� Clifford &Elizabeth A Grimsley Paul L Hower 5531 Stardust Dr 5541 Stardust Dr 11724 Kirwin Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 195 192 19 829 195 192 20 830 195 192 21 831 Dane L Witzke ✓ Katherine B Kenworthy ✓ Donald & Debbie Leath 5571 Stardust Dr 16341 Mount Nimbus St 5591 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 192 22 832 195 192 23 833 195 192 24 834 James J Dunn Jr. Jesus O & Maryann Nolasco �_. Scott P & Pamela M Worrell 5601 Stardust Dr 5611 Stardust Dr 5621 Stardust Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 193 01 835 195 193 02 836 195 193 03 837 Ronald J Weibelt Jr. ✓ Anton J Kaufman Robert I Pfeffer 5562 Stardust Dr 5552 Stardust Dr 5542 Stardust Dr .� Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 193 04 838 195 193 05 839 195 193 06 840 Eugene F Havlik <f- Creig W Miller Jr. Daniel Linehan 5532 Stardust Dr 5522 Stardust Dr PO Box 292326 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Phelan CA 92329 195 193 07 841 195 193 08 842 195 193 09 843 Jeffrey W McDonald La Vern L Stejskal Sueyoshi Inouye L 5501 Tangiers Dr 5521 Tangiers Dr 5531 Tangiers Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519310 844 19519311 845 19519312 846 Darrell Summers Glen Paul Loock Judith L Green 5541 Tangiers Dr 55531 Tangiers Dr 5561 Tangiers Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519401 847 195 194 02 848 195 194 03 849 Asuncion M Zepeda Kory & Dee Dee Mills ✓ Beth Lee Panutsos Jr. 6091 Apache Rd 5552 Tangiers Dr 5542 Tangiers Dr Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519404 850 19 119 51 j l�S 3 �` �{ 195 194 06 852 Richard B Fellows ��^" " ,t V,� .433Y Connie M Bush V 5532 Tangiers Dr POrr4 ' (r,� 5521 Dollar Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Downey CA 90241 -S'1`"7 �- Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519407 853 ✓ 195 194 08 854 19519409 855 Ridhard Edson Holdaway Carl Joseph Skokan l✓ William Joseph Sartain 3200 La Rotonda Dr#318 5541 Dollar Dr 5551 Dollar Dr Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 (ne8P - SP rr,-�) mot 360' 195 223 28 976 195 223 29 977 195 223 30 978 Edward F Pomerleau v Sidney Sternberg Hau H Ho 5871 Frontier Cir 2049 S Beverly Dr ✓ 5891 Frontier Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90034 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 31 979 195 223 32 980 195 223 33 981 Frieda Fonzelle Taddeo Murari I_ Gupta Richard L Kusper 6391 Farinella Dr 18201 E Evergreen Cir 28882 Top Of The World Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Villa Park CA 92861 Laguna Beach CA 92651 195 223 34 982 195 223 35 983 195 223 36 84 ' Tracy & Brenda Tomasek Franklin E Welsh Jr. Erik & . el� g fists` 5941 Frontier Cir 5951 Frontier Cir 59 n ie Ci Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 ntingto each CA 9264�7— ch -r30 195 223 37 985 195 223 38 986 195 223 39 987 Carol Jean Seimetz V- Joseph Lisack v Yin Lang & Mei Yu Wang 8665 Algeciras Dr#3b 5952 Frontier Cir 5942 Frontier Cir t_ Indianapolis IN 46250 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 40 988 195 223 41 989 195 223 42 990 Kathryn Johnston �' Michael & Caryl L Deovlet v Michael & Donna Langmack + - 5932 Frontier Cir 5922 Frontier Cir 5902 Frontier Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 43 991 195 223 44 992 195 223 45 993 Richard Gaston �` Lee C Oberly ti' Curtis & Debra L Nabors �. 5892 Frontier Cir 18338 Mount Cherie Cir 5872 Frontier Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 46 994 195 223 47 995 195 223 48 996 Eugene Henry Opfer / Son N Lam `' John M Boyle 19231 Worchester Ln 5881 Croupier Dr 19731 Topeka Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 223 49 997 195 223 50 998 195 223 51 999 Timothy D Grennan Christopher Calkin Trang &Ngo Dao 5901 Croupier Dr 5921 Croupier Dr 5931 Croupier Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 223 52 1000 195 223 53 1001 195 223 54 1002 David Gonzalez Mohamad R Chehrzad 1, Carole Glass 5941 Croupier Dr 5951 Croupier Dr 5961 Croupier Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 01 1003 Lr 195 231 02 1004 195 231 03 1005 LeHung Alimonte Marsella Jack R Chandler ✓ 5962 Croupier Dr 2332 Caddie Ct 5942 Croupier Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Oceanside CA 92056 Huntington Beach CA 92647 6 (n(2- aP- S\ U.a SOT C) 095 030 11 1 095 030 12 2 095 030 35 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 14501412 4 14501428 5 14501432 6 Am Food Korean f Laboratories Mma John Hewitt is 5312 Bolsa Ave 15171 Pipeline Ln 5492 Bolsa Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 14501435 7 14501451 8 145 014 52 9 Nick Becker / Alfonso Licata '/ Carol J Licata 15495 Graham St 15691 Butterfield St 1261 Peacock Hill Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 Santa Ana CA 92705 145 014 53 10 145 014 54 11 145 014 55 12 Michael L Wilkie RREEF-IV INC lk" RREEF-IV INC �.. �; y PO Box 1497 PO Box 1497 Sunset Beach CA 90742 Sunset Beach CA 90742 145 014 61 13 145 364 17 _14 145 364 18 15- i2S t� i h� r" ' James A Ferlita BOLSA PARTNERS Shied-da �i i`fl � BOL Quail St PARTNERS #190 Y 2 2 3'�� 'a ° °' /d-6042 Bolsa Ave Newport Beach CA 92660 I. 3 'rr-,t a o Huntington Beach CA 92647 (', 145 531 25 16 � 145 531 28 17�1 6 m� , t� l &1455315E29 �a AEW & LBA ACQUISITION CO Q' "°"�8d�-jro H..RtiP31b' 145 531 36 19 145 531 37 20 145 541 21 21 GORBRAND PROPERTIESy Nick Becker HUNTINGTON NORTH PARTNERSH 15495 Graham St PO Box 1876 QL•_ Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 F� ?6 oS-7 t:k-- 3 I 145 541 22 22 145 541 24 23 ucL 145 541 25 24 EUROLUX PARTNERS AEW & LBA ACQUISITION C _-' AEW & LBA ACQUISITION CO PO Box 25025 �y 7 b U c�. lam^^-cam- 1/1-10 VON 1?4 e� Glendale CA 91221 ) L G 0 145 541 26 25 �'_1 145 541 27 26 ` 195 011 01 27 AEW & LBA ACQUISITION CO AEW & LBA ACQUISITION CO Thomas n Melton a- v �I�'�-o U a�. ��„�,-_. � S� 6001 Glenwood Dr tA---9—n49 ' i t o Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 011 02 28 195 011 03 29 195 011 04 30 Kenneth R Henderson r-' Robert & Marlene Vanalstine Gary D Van Bouchaute .� 6021 Glenwood Dr 17833 Malden St 6051 Glenwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Northridge CA 91325 Huntington Beach CA 92647 t o'- 300 195 012 01 31 195 012 02 32 195 012 03 33 Charles E O'Brien ,% Richard J Murphy Michael Guttentag 6002 Glenwood Dr 6022 Glenwood Dr 6032 Glenwood Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 012 04 34 195 012 15 35 195 012 16 36 Timothy R Greene Eugene H Opfer Robert Carter 19212 NE 141 st St 11� 19231 Worchester Ln 6031 Hardwick Cir Woodinville WA 98072 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 y�4 195 012 17 37 �(1�� 195 012 18 38 S 6"y 195 012 19 39 Mogens &Tove Fredlow� Thomas Lee Martin 3 �}A�-; Tom O Metzger 6021 Hardwick Cir 6002 Hardwick Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 F-i., c A Q� �'�7 L P,qun 4 NI o 195 012 20 40 195 012 21 41 195 012 22 42 Alan Anderson Carol J Littlejohn / Charles A Straub 6022 Hardwick Cir 6032 Hardwick Cir v 6052 Hardwick Cir ton Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington 19503106 43 195 031 07 44 195 031 08 U� 45 NJ,1*ZA 4 � �„�.�,�,�eY Anthony &Cynthia Arthur ✓ Ken R Macken 6051 Ivory Cir 6031 Ivory Cir �— 8 -1-� �� �y -Y)1Vre0,uCF-,k Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 H Rd, JPut16Er4461 AI- Fiyy1- A N 195 031 09 R46 ��# M " �� 195 031 10 47 195 031 11 48 Angelina & Eliseo Roman r Steven & Kathy L Villa Jr. 6001 Ivory Cir 6002 Ivory Cir 6022 Ivory Cir &----- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 12 49 195 031 13 50 195 031 24 51 Matthew P Lac John I Gray � Y Lewis E Storrer 6032 Ivory Cir 6052 Ivory Cir 16512 Kettler Ln �"— Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 25 52 195 031 26 53 195 031 27 54 Seth S Swenson ✓ Maria R Jordan �- Daniel Lee Davis 6031 Jade Cir 6021 Jade Cir 21082 Spurney Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 031 28 55 195 031 29 56 195 031 30 57 0 David C Goecke Fe R Springer r 6002 Jade Cir 3175 Partridge Ln 6032 Jade Cir Z G� Huntington Beach CA 92647 Paso Robles CA 93446 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 31 58 195 031 42 59 195 031 43 60 Ronald Owen Pfeifer Michael & Brenda McCormick Thiep Lai 6052 Jade Cir 6051 Kelsey Cir ✓ 6031 Kelsey Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 r-,t o' - 3a o —Q14- 195 031 44 61 195 031 45 62 195 031 46 63 Michael E Fountain Jacqueline Surratt LeMoyne Martin & Patty Goud 6021 Kelsey Cir I✓ 16141 Nassau Ln 6002 Kelsey Cir ✓ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 031 47 64 195 031 48 65 195 031 49 66 Christopher R & Lori J Kinder John F March bj Edwin A Hudson 6022 Kelsey Cir k" 17211 Sandra Lee Ln 6052 Kelsey Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Ts koq 99 rr� 195 031 60 67 195 031 61 68 195 031 62 69 '� Ralph & Ralph Lewis Jr. e^` Lucinda Wiley p p ✓ te 6021 Larchwood Dr 6051 Larchwood Dr 15471 Cottonwood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647- 3<? , 195 031 63 70 195 051 04 71 195 051 05 72 Tang Tsan Hwa Mary C Neville Irene E Guarderas 6001 Larchwood Dr 6002 Larchwood Dr 18282 Fieldbury Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 195 051 06 73 195 051 07 74 195 051 57 75 Carl J Branson / Michael & Donna Frayer Raul Rivera 6032 Larchwood Dr V 6052 Larchwood Dr J/ 6001 Cortez Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 051 58 76 � 195 051 59 Z7 195 051 60 78 re ►c.ho)F-L TN I Rat Ilse A Mulligan �- Gabriella e Keith � �nr Im Dr 6021 Cortez Dr �19 Hunt 6031 Cortez Dr Cortez Huntington Beach CA 92647_ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 %L 195 053 01 79 195 053 02 80 195 053 03 81 Salvador Ybarra Sr. Patrick J O'Brien Jr. Richard & Susan Stephens 6002 Cortez Dr ✓- E 6 2-L �R' 6032 Cortez Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Upla�d-S-, 784 4z G Huntington Beach CA 92647 �,3 3s 195 053 04 82 195 053 05 83 195 053 06 84 James M Mitchell Robert E Geiss Gary A Petersen 21731 Seaside Ln 14881 Vanguard Ln 15332 Wilson St Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 195 053 07 85 195 053 08 86 195 053 09 87 Gregory & Ana Viliegas James L & Lolita S Peck Jr.J Gordon L Phillips M/ 6072 Sherman Dr 14901 Vanguard Ln ✓ 14911 Vanguard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 053 17 88 r^ 195 053 18 89 195 053 19 90 Paul E Hendifar ✓ UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFOR Lawrence J Meyer 1423edondo Beach Blvd PO Box 7600 y/-- 14025 Faust Ave Gardena CA 90247 Los Angeles CA 90051 Bellflower CA 90706 MC 6e - S P r•-1p ram,$ o 195 071 �4 91 195 071 27 92 195 073 10 93 Nellie Finochio Jose & Rosa Amaya Thang Van & Hoa Thuy Nguyen 14501 Chateau Ln 14481 Chateau Ln 6052 Briarcliff Dr ✓ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 4�"` 1 V 195 073 11 94 195 073 12 95 1950731R 3 9 Rs b Pete &Angela Frousiakis Y Billie Chase �� lf C 3a3 (tf•��s1R� 6032 Briarcliff Dr 6022 Briarcliff Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Da F'`���LBS� �, 90'd 195 111 01 97 195 111 02 98 195 111 03 99 DOUGLAS REALTY COI C DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC d a 1 42 H 195 111 04 100 195 111 05 101 195 111 07 102 195111DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC 195111DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC MC DONNELL DOUGLAS CORP PO Box 4111 n 1 �� — P Rex 44 HamzelwDDJ-W Hazelwood MO 63042 195 111 08 103 195 111 09 104 < � 195 111 10 105 MC DONNELL DOUGLAS CORP MC 2gNNELLpOUGLAS REALTY- Mt DF M/C C1 NNELL DOUGLAS 1- 60� tREALTY C PO Box 4111 =-�" th FI M/C Cl 801-6 k(nGQ _ Hazelwood MO 63042 Long Beach CA 90808 Long Beach CA 90808 , 195 111 11 106 195 111 12 107 195 111 13 108 MC DONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY C MC DONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY C MC DONNELL DOUGLASR(EA�LTY C 6th FI M/C Cl 801-60 12th Floor 1 6th FI M/C C1 801- L Long Beach CA 90808 Irvine CA 92715 � �`�t`11 Long Beach CA 90808 195 112 01 111 195 111 14 109 195 111 15 110 MC DONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY C I� MC DONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i-Ftoer+`{0 6 o e,�ao caa ,Q !� 14 1 nth-F r City Hall 4 - - cI �'ol-bo 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 q ono 8 195 112 05 112 �� 195 112 06 113 19511207 114 Argyle Campbell DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC "�-b-L U,;teti PO Box 4111 L—'- RQ- 11 Hu ti nn 8 Hazelwood MO 63042 042 (�i er, S ). (oL 3 ' 195 112 09 115 195 112 10 116 195 112 11 117 DOUG'LAS REALTY CO INC DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP i9�ox 4111 "qk - v Sharp Plaza �- 2 Hazelwood MO 63042 Mahwah NJ 07430 195 112 12 118 195 181 09 119 195 181 10 120 DOUGLAS REALTY CO INC Adam.9�r ©P f. l L L Virginia Rzeczycki PO 1 5411 Harold Dr 17071 Herbert Ln 1� H Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Mc-6P — SP 19518207 121 195 182 08 122 195 182 09 123 Harry Derderian Hector A Vazquez Geneva S Powell 14312 Spa Dr 14322 Spa Dr �! 14332 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19518304 124 �� 195 183 05 125 195 183 06 126 Hoa Van °4;T w—+�g-Nguyen Daniel & Elizabeth Murakami Norman & Jennifer Tribe - 3-52 Spa Br `�,� 5"f. 14362 Spa Dr 14372 Spa Dr 7 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Cow. 6 0 9 0 5' 19518402 127 195 184 03 128 19518404 129 Mark Snyder David & Brook Snider Eric Biefeld 14392 Spa Dr 14402 Spa Dr p---- 14412 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 185 01 130 195 185 02 131 195 185 03 132 Sharon F Story �� Loren Neely �' Susan M Mays 14281 Spa Dr 3303 Josie Ave 14301 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Long Beach CA 90808 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 185 04 133 195 185 05 134 195 185 06 135 Eugene Mesa ✓ Robert Carpenter Okey L Ferrell Sr. 14311 Spa Dr 14321 Spa Dr 14331 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 185 07 136 195 185 08 137 195 185 09 138 Dan Jamieson Michael P Cormack y- David A Ewell 14341 Spa Dr 14351 Spa Dr 14361 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 185 10 139 195 185 11 140 195 185 12 141 Jack V Frank �/' Ray E Stevens Y - Marilyn Wapato 14371 Spa Dr 14381 Spa Dr 14391 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19518513 142 19518514 143 19518515 144 Murari Gupta �— Bruce David Boesing ✓ Robert Isaac 18201 E Evergreen Cir 14411 Spa Dr 14421 Spa Dr ?, Villa Park CA 92861 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 185 16 145 195 185 17 14f?' 19519509 147 Norbert E Kramer Jr. Kevin P & Rhonda H Maher ` Anthony Y & Teng 14431 Spa Dr slos ) Huntington Beach CA 92647 ['a, 9X7bY 195 195 10 148 195 195 11 149 195 195 12. bi 1 Douglas R & Diane E Mohr Stephen Claassen 5532 Dollar Dr 5862 Camphor Ave Dr I yLyb Z Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 OfftncTs--C-A 867 �- 5 Cn gz6y7 195 195 13 151 195 195 14 152 195 195 15 153 Guy Campbell Kimbrough ANNLYNN CORPORATION George G Lee 30738 Wavecrest Cir ✓ PO Box 2242 20871 Woodlea Ln !r Menifee CA 92584 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 195 16 154 195 195 17 155 195 195 18 156 Sidney Paul Dubin Y Miguel A Rodriguez �� Edward Goldsmith 5561 Spa Dr 5571 Spa Dr 5581 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 195 19 157 195 195 20 158 195 195 21 159 Joseph & Eileen Vicic Yan-Chow Ma John G Arredondo PO Box 507 30806 Casilina Dr 5611 Spa Dr ✓ Sunset Beach CA 90742 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519601 160 195 196 02 161 195 196 03 162 Marion & Michael Alexander Willie E Webb Alfonso Camargo 5612 Spa Dr 5602 Spa Dr 11- . 1362 Casitas Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Corona CA 91720 195 196 04 163 195 196 05 164 195 196 06 165 Avis DeLonais Franzesco & Donato Leombruni Soon Dal Park -- 5582 Spa Dr 5572 Spa Dr ✓ 5562 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19519607 166 195 196 08 167 195 196 09 168 John A Aniol Franzesco Leombruni David Lee Harrington 5552 Spa Dr � 823 Warren Rd .: � 14481 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Bullhead City AZ 86429 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 196 10 169 cf- 195 196 11 170 195 196 12 171 Patricia BurtTK Mark Pauly �- Thomas A Madden 1,4,4�s�.�..BrSOJ �Q ++R. �- 14461 Spa Dr 14451 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 212 09 172 195 212 10 173 195,2.12 11 1745,M0�7 otv Sean David Pettit �- Hazel BGrover -R- *er & 5701 Spa Dr 5691 Spa Dr `� P,o, 4 3 S Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 47 c,-cw 176 195 212 14 177 ) 19521212 175 An 19521213 Q �.1'.�uC,c.a.,, Larry Van Tilburg Charles Baclet 5671 Spa Dr 5661 Spa Dr 5 � Q-0. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 7 GAS., Q�635 195 212 15 178 195 212 16 179 195 213 01 t 180 Robert J Medeiros William H Hoback / Jean Widman 5631 Spa Dr ►11— 5621 Spa Dr v 8121 S VaJe Garden Rd Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Canby OR 97013 6 MC Q-P - S-e mt o'- 195 213 02 181 195 213 03 182 195 213 04 183 dI�J O M S ORANGE COUNTY HOLINES Robert Zorich Carolyn J Davidson 4872 Bishop St - Pa ink(,S t 5642 Spa Dr Spa yy�/ Cypress CA 90630 Huntington Beach CA 92647 t.0 .o,itt -�, em- 1),567 19521305 184 195 213 06 185 195 213 07 186 (--�\ Gary L &Judy A Goering Daniel R Grbas �. Pwe •Bui ,Zoh n \1 0- 5672 Spa Dr 5682 Spa Dr 1 - Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 H 5647 5�c�LLI't.��b��7 195 213 08 187 195 213 09 188 195 213 10 189 Bonnie L Fabac ./' Hazel Blair Lacey John E Heilman 5702 Spa Dr 5712 Spa Dr '� 5722 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 213 11 190 195 213 12 191 195 213 13 192 Anselmo Zuniga �- Carey M Furlong Jeffrey 8-Pefois Hilbert 1 , 5732 Spa Dr 5742 Spa Dr 11-� 5752 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 213 14 193 195 213 15 194 195 213 16 195 Albert Gerald Opatz / JPrtpak/ k R. SI ISnn Joseph C Bartolone C, Hncloc 5431 Kenwood Ave 5772 Spa Dr "T 2 vonrq T �-E 9334 Flicker Ave Buena Park CA 90621 Huntington Beach CA 92647- 07 Fountain Valley CA 92708 195 213 17 196 195 213 18 197 195 213 19 198 Linda M Jones Glenn W Jones Alvin C Harp Sr. �- 18514 Santa Tomasa Cir 610 Ocean Ave 5822 Spa Dr Fountain Valley CA 92708 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 213 20 199 195 213 21 200 195 214 01 201 Fredrick A Spencer 144R � U. 14er b- ►4w R G vccF Norman D Owens 5832 Spa Dr 5842 Spa Dr 5731 Spa Dr 1/ Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19521402 202 195 214 03 203 195 214 04 204 Randall W & Dee Ann Austin Dale V Svenson Judith Ann Townsend 5741 Spa Dr '1--- 5751 Spa Dr 5761 Spa Dr A-' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 214 05 205 195 214 06 206 195 214 07 207 Charles Michael Garcia Robert Bigger Jones Robert J $ L Benter II 1045 Palmetto Way ##E 5781 Spa Dr ' ' 5801 Spa Dr Carpinteria CA 93013 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 214 08 208 195 214 09 209 195 214 10 210 Kent Tucker Juan Alarcon John R &-GwQ3." L Eccles 5811 Spa Dr 5821 Spa Dr 5831 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 0 rnee(P --IC- 195 214 11 211 195 214 12 212 195 231 05 213 Michael Preece William P Gillette Jr. Harry R Paul— Qaq'-:A go 11,F-R f R. 14501 Calneva Ln 14491 Calneva Ln 14492 Sahara Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 06 214 195 231 07 215 195 231 08 216 Judy K Pariseau ` Richard A Breunig Sean Michael McGr�oarrty t� u 41 Nugget Cir 5951 Nugget Cir 5622 Brighton Dr 59 gg Huntington Beach CA 92647 2 Huntington g Huntington Beach CA 949 ton Beach CA 92647 6 g 9 195 231 09 217 195 231 10 218 195 231 11 219 Ralph G Duran Richard & R@;;o Barrett Robert J Stahl 5961 Nugget Cir 5962 Nugget Cir ✓ 5952 Nugget Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 12 220 195 231 13 221 195 231 14 222 James Gregory ° LawFie DeRiee Willard Gerald A Lewis Jeffreys-�McConnell 5942 Nugget Cir " 5932 Nugget Cir t� 5922 Nugget Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 15 223 195 231 16 224 195 231 17 225 Lorenzo C Peluso Anne L Hunt Anthony Ranalli 5902 Nugget Cir 5892 Nugget Cir 14511 Sahara Ln Huntington Beach'CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 18 226 195 231 19 227 195 231 22 228 Anthony analli Steven I Hochfelsen Kelly L &-Pafftig .McCarty Ant y R f 14511 Sahara Ln 14491 Sahara Ln 14492 Calneva Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 231 23 229 195 231 24 230 195 231 25 231 Geraldine Ross Trustor& E Winn Guy & Cheryl Murolo Billy 0 Chisholm 14502 Calneva Ln j, 14512 Calneva Ln 5862 Spa Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntingt on Beach CA 92647 9 g 195 231 26 232 95 38 1 4 11 233 19538412 12 234 Eugene R Estes Henry J Rupprecht . Thomas W Lorenzen ; 5852 Spa Dr l/ 5392 Horsham Ave ' PO Box 2726 x Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 195 384 13 235 195 384 14 236 195 384 15 237 John S Langhans Jesse & Deborah Perez Mark W BaileyY 5412 Horsham Ave �} 14266 Uxbridge St 14262 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 16 238 195 384 31 239 fv A 195 384 36 240 Daniel & Cynthia Ann Minear ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR 14252 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 6) (',( F3 F - S-r' t df-r- A- �t A -. - ,r„• S�'�-pep�ai`,.n� � ' sir :3� d�k�f � - �� a A n ockway, City Clerk untington Beach )f the City Clerk ' -). Box 190 i Beach,CA 92648 (p .e Igo I� 195 111 12 MC DONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY CO $Da 12th Floor ( f� q0 0 iiM6y�, Irvine CA 92715 , 'NTY `P LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING pr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, October 6, 1997,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following items: 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO 96-1/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 96- &ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 96-1 (McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plank lic nt: McDonnell Douglas Realty Company, Stephen J. Barker, Director of Business Operations Request: To master plan the 307 acre site by developing a specific plan to establish the planning concept,design and architectural theme, development regulations, infrastructure needs and administrative procedures necessary to achieve an orderly and compatible industrial park. The specific plan shall implement the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. With the adoption of the specific plan, all future development consistent with the specific plan shall be pre-entitled and subject only to review and approval by the Community Development Director. ZMA: To amend Sectional District Map No. 9-5-11 by changing the zoning map designations on the 307 acre site from Limited Industrial(IL)and Limited Industrial-High Rise Overlay(IL- H)to McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. ZTA: To amend the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by adding the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The specific plan shall be the zoning for the 307 acre site and include the development regulations,design and architectural guidelines, and administrative procedures to implement the general plan designation of Industrial General. The specific plan will allow for the continued operation and expansion of the aerospace facility and the development of manufacturing,warehouse, office,research and development and commercial uses. EIR. Addresses potential environmental impacts associated with the Zoning Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to allow for the adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11. The EIR has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Location: The 307 acre site is generally bounded by Rancho Road and the U. S.Navy spur track on the north, Springdale Street on the east, Bolsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Street on the west. Pr!,Ject Planner: Herb Fauland, Senior Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#1 is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1. N FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after October 2, 1997. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as out above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may,be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (g:Iegals:counci1:97CC 106)) J. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Herb Fauland Senior Planner FROM: Connie Brockway;. City Clerk DATE: September 17, 1997 SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF LABELS FOR PUBLIC HEARING 1016/97 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS I faxed the public hearing notice Tuesday upon receipt. The Independent will manage on Could you transmit their Tuesdayto publish but always request that I try to fax by Monday. C y P Y q request to your staff who provide the legal notice? Please check these labels to ensure they are all from the 1997 tax rolls and maps. The certification from Susan Case has a date of 8/14/97 and also refers back to 6124/97. Please verify that all labels conform to state law that requires the labels to be from the 1997 equalized rolls and if updated to be even more recent; that the updates be based on the 1997 rolls. Please verify by Friday as our volunteer, Maria, will be in to do the hearing notices. Thank you. S USAN W. CASE, INC. OWNERSHIP LISTING SERVICE 917 Glenneyre Street,Suite 7,Laguna Beach, CA 92651 PHONE(714)494-6105 • FAX(714)494-7418 CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS LIST THE ATTACHED LIST REPRESENTS THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED WITHIN FEET OF THE EXTERIO BOUNDARI S OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM METROSCAN, A DATA SOURCE, UTILIZING THE COUNTY ASSESSMENT ROLLS AND OTHER DATA SOURCES. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS GENERALLY DEEMED RELIABLE, BUT IS NOT GU TEED. SUSAN W. CASE, INC. Qd 10 43: CO I. Co co LU Ct't to r CU Q 7•_ O m O I, N co N Tm W Q r -O N wGq, Lo rn C dLo it c �T (j 0 a) j 00 «3 � � cry O° i as 3 2 C) � CD _ ISI Z W C.� tJ C 3 w� CU ? t cn lie OD Q Q _ O co w U CD cco rn W U � Y N U co m co —cy)U x o rn U x cLi p`Z ^e '� I A J o i I ► : c : : I i �- o =m o mao ou � oo2 �� 0c =O O coU o pad o U = U = tX W t.... ►x co I' CV •�; : O C Q N U � O � c bA __ N L co _. CC + CN. c6 a- O) tf. Q _ p � Cl.Q p t LO cCU N z i 4 U r Co \p cn to all \ 00 AD CD i -- ! •�1 pi L_i ?. ti71 C] Ln LIZ` '`t w w U U O O Z z J —t Q Q Y 00 CD LL i It w d -C J U �G ( J -id CJ m o a a�� Vlpd� Cl) o < �ac� dlNy�y U C rn U U C _ rn 0 alb Ih it L_ Co co Ijt ti T mme Z ■ � = OO C � = OO c: Pts co a) a: O / O�o,0 cc aO cv v � c `O _ U 2 to �.L !•�! � —_ l:•.1 M �s:� — cq zu � o . U — o cc � � > ¢ O as Ist bA N U d 0 d1 Q M z V > >zr {Ci UO Z t4 z µ� LU �'�,o�� �• U d i U m AC �' LU U_ O CD ~ Z Z a'V► CD Q 41 Q co w �, v w co r (D .J U ca N J o '° co mU x v co m00 °' rn �y Ifs � a� 00 O 0U = U = LU .t:l'� tt� O LOCD f� oLO U et l\ I O CD U p L Ln CD -0 O r' Lo C � i U m cz Ccn N C3 CD Q LLJ J � J LU W C� jf ,,' w Yco uj N O J Ca m CD0 Q PLH r/,ydo ;,m 5 p a a�� dlpyo _ 1 � � : _ m o o v O �1/� OR�� o v U = U = r_> 1 ro 0 :a 3 Q x � — x lZQ j a 0 02W j aZ QaZ :i: t y W O W c0 to 0 to _ O Z - IN IL act -j jcE CO f r- col, LLJ z v `..0. c- N �.� w IUZw - s�': u U O LL cc Cc cc \ i Yi Q W W ' GQ w N a a 03 z Gl O L7 o Itx :R: z H L r fn � �-- coOJ U 2i 1 �J1 C CD LO m cr) CD r � � - Z Z S CC t¢ m i en Cl- f t LL LIJ U .a F— O tZ It LU yx Z co CDLLJ —� O L cp cl) J U ca U Y U yy ca yyCD s r� A N a) m U 0 � 0 d CO as x U +°• °+ J ;_ L m a) 3c � 0M m � 'li l INS ae m = Ot1 0 s'1 0 U y I � ` c y�'�11� O�+p��� U O = �1I OAS OU O U 2 = n 2 c no 0 ��,��ao c►jy p o= 2. �ryy o ii o o �+� 1. o = ao A 0 CD co CD M n o W n �p9�lA �'�'� (D � CD rn w a O � r � i Z Z 0 O Cj «1 m rn + + -v C r o s , `) i• TDB g < th to t. CD Ai CD N O � A� h � 0J -O rn CDCD Z "^� Dco Ste. O t• N N of d 2 i) rn — � o , 2. CD 0 x OCR Al D CID 0 o 9p/A N A A N CID 0 w n r-- =r cu m � ? CD CID 0 D D r— r z C) Z � N C7 rn ' 4 pr—p O CO ill n 1 O ry �_ rn o Uy o C' z °c � o C- D o 07 W CD co Ul x co 0 <v1 f' I tit lJA TC A J �' D jai J m w w , �. /i ••..i �. r r pp _ - _ O0 �_ r-A 0 4� 7 00 7 rr o _� _ ,�j�d ya o,� y cu = Wo c� 2 • � I '� W0S j s +I � I Ij; a s cc oo � : sc I I o� cc 07 attee ;; I h �! : m sv o m 0x � co � i �' � °' � S X o U3 0 r. ? -� n o=� y y�. f` 0 c10�` n co (� N n rn � 0 m A 0 rn CID m D D r— r z Z o O n m m b � C C r � C7 n � m R; 50 -� i Z < wv � Z cn +� ,f7 m 0) > C/) s�. o (nn -4 m N S W m O Q iv F... tJt - (4 CCD C7, ' ¢, p1 _ -a _ - 41- 3 O CD gt 1 s r� }•R � z -Y 1 i e _ ?1 I i A�J 1 Oi 741 .I. f ��dao ciTyo o 2. ►i, i s o CD at 'Zrt ' g 0 po 20 m c -� i'_► h � I a, moo =r D O 0 W (D m ism G-) c D r Z O —i C7 El [Ell Lp m i C M. o o n a Hr ro L1 3 C 0 15 f� , r 7 Tn `ls m :0 a c v, 1n In v c� C —i Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk RO.BOX 190 ^� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 195 195 09 147 Anthony Y & Lauren Lee Teng 2926 S Danbury Way Santa Ana CA 92704 �► SIN6tpy ` :j-`. LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. BOX 190 : SEP Huntington Beach, CA 92648 { X•: 939 010 06 331 BOLSA AVE BUSINESS 2 Corporate Park � SIN6tpp, Irvine CA 92606 — =MTM mil' 1►�� .!�. i i: ,�. ... ... � -.-; `, �NTy LEGAL NOTICE�.PUBLIo FLARING !III ifitflit�{tflfillftlfIl}{ff{dlifl?ilt!?ft?I{{( }!ffff( Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 025917 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 223 36 Arturo Bautista ING 5961 Frontier Cr M4 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 5AUT%9b1 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TQ SEND BAUTISTA 1313 W MULLOY DR 'it too* ADDISON IL 60101—aO37 ppN NTI LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING 0 1 0 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 �LrZo J Huntington Beach, CA 92648 939 010 07 332 BOLSA AVE BUSINESS 2 Corporate Park Irvine CA 92606 auNTv LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING 9 2 6.4 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �n 195 423 65 300 WESTMINSTE_R VILLAGE'-1OMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln ING Huntington Beach CA 92646 jp�,��q --.�—_. � .wnr+,.*:�n+ww.wv...+,+iww...:.....«rws,rr,.:.. ... - • ..w-.. RETURN RETURN - Cp Cad' TO SENDER -- uNT� LEGAL NOr�TII�C/E PIREI 7 L.J�'! LC• 1. - '; llll,,,ll,l,ll,,,�llll,illlll„f„111,►1111,,,�,�„llll„11/`1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Ir, '7 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 423 61 297 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln INGjpy� Huntington Beach CA 92646 `O ro44,Eo F9� w y RETURN DER PUBLIC HEARING j G ORGY =�0 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 422 85 269 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 INGTp�,�F _.,:.. RETURN T - FWD , EXPI L NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING r-s Esc cu.cr �earwsr ac '12416169-iI9419-01 10 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 422 82 268 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln INGTp�Y Huntington Beach CA 92646 w y RN RETURN pp�NTY F D G BLIC HEARING _ �'�►�'—� �. �-�0 11,1„;,i,i,ll,,,l„ll„l,li,,,;,,lil,l„fl,,,l,l„lI„,„1,11 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk "_ ✓ ``:A P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 939 010 04 Bolsa Ave. Business Center INGTpy 2 Corporate Park#160 Irvine, CA 92606 LINTY LEGAL NOTICE 1- PUBLIC'HEARING -- j =6�48—�`i�tG3r�..i � II.1,,,,1,l,II,,.I„li„I,II,,,„,Ili,l„fl,,,l,l„I!.fit f,fl Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 'i 95 423 64 299 `,^.IESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW �NSINGTp 20062 Lawson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 C%3 — y Ri:J• ���t - �. �a'MY.tH"»u.v.svM taAPN• .+r.��.. .. RETURN TO 5 I=WDG OR 'IRED LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 0 i •ire Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk -77 l P.O. Box 190 ;7 a Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _ 195 053 04 82 James M Mitchell 21731 Seaside Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 INGTpy ao� =�werokorfo BF� - - LURN RETUR LEGAL NOTICE pIR'����� Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk ` , .s. P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 423 63 298 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson, Ln ING Huntington Beach CA 92646 Tpy�F9 `TuF ,9 its oQ RETURN 3 , TO y1r,d 0 DEp LEGAL NOTICELL- PUBLIC HEARING FWj ��-0 { ,0 Connie Brockway, City Clerk ---� City of Huntington Beach 3 °h; Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 9264 T ' Y Vj: 195 414 74 243 David & Joan Hornick 5175 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 INGIp _., IrS �� ►x I.N• NTI � - PUBLIC HEARING LEGAL NOTICE '3'��y�; �.,U'j,�'1 Iltit{}31{IlIISlIltlFfFl1lFllFIIiSIF£Iit1llt tllF£t}Ii1£I3lF£I Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 7 P.O. Box 190 w UA ` f Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r fyf, 'y"Vc 4 1710, 741 �NTINGjp NO WEST MTG INC 166 Rancho Rd estminster CA 92683 pill �pUN LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING '�Lfs>3Su�Q IIiI�F Sl! }S NJ., !!III fill}Slli£fi1i}}11£H3}!II}S£Fltl1 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 , c:*' ;7 i Huntington Beach, CA 92648 `� 145 543 03 475 INGTp�, Millard Boldman F 24884 Jim Bridger Rd San Diego CA ij Y1 9RINGLEGA" NOTIC 'PUBLIC Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 r�'<< Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � �I p4 939 010 01, 0 5 326 INGTpy BOLSA AVE BUSINESS BF 2 Corporate Park#160 Irvine CA 92606 co K NTT' LEGALNO NCE- PUBLIC HEARING j I` Connie Brockway, City Clerk _ City of Huntington Beach , cr ;. Ur Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 uci z�u' 17 1= Huntington Beach, CA 92648 195 422 8-1 267 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln GrO�, Huntington Beach CA 92646 Rt"T RETURN T(� S F C -' W � ?I r t FIRE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ii tjjF t t Fjss ' rL��r /{� ''✓ � 1£IFllls£l.lf£.FF£F1# £!?s#1£. V .�.;:_, �;;-���:,�,,�. 9re. 4�5 �£LYifl Illllllflflllll,ll,}111,1f1,1111 Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk x �� P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r a 145 014 28 5 n Laboratoe MMma 15171 Pipeline n G Huntington Beach CA 92649 ro�e 1Q_�p6p11r014�F_ FA� V S MMA-171 926493004 1996 14 09/3 — FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND 9 _ �► :MMA LABORATORIES .... 15062 BOLSA CHICA ST HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 9-1 023 NT LEGAL NOTICE -�SPUBLIC HEgARIING ) 7S64S l i� 11 -0 ri fl; I I111111f I1I11I1I1I1f 1(I1I/I1ff 11S1I.I I1 I11I 1111I1I}1I11111II1It �wyO c/Tyo = p ry; CD o We 1p R. I .r ..11 41 a*" al A X o tQ t i " 0 - CD ss1r U CD r-- 4 -1 o ti z t/�t/s� a�i Q c� -cl. oM Cq c, c7. _ C9 Gomm & " (7 9 m b 4b \ CD a� ON W _ CD- Go �C hat C H. U Y. N yy M :► a rfT , 0 ca of U xx 0ji �3i . o fix' I o = o O me �' ,�il : �,� �� c cr. o °, mowam y �1l L. . 0 I 2 0 Cl�t�� � p n CD CDo i1 11 es G o . C •AE IF `.�i� �1 � Q0 � -s 0 � i',D'Z5 _ N X 0 n r S (D m 0 ©Q pad O no00 n 1A CD 1 00 2:(n ;:r O O- a to G m� o m ate. ; a z o -.P:- m � 7 N (l CD C j < O r n c. C > --Itt- H Q00,) C Oto ► o _ LA 00 �t TJCO m CODD C.- 70r•7J m p 1•.;i -i-i 0 -i 0 0011 00 1 MOD m _ ZE0 dryZ u 1 i. r p 0 1:, O ._ N v i { z n kn m Cl) O m -•. {, ,� i ' 0 n k -r ? III M II CD WSO_+ Tj 7 - z 00 0 (t `��0 Don0,� F o CD m o Dm = � m ca x 00 a _i•I , i�; ; w s 0 D Cl) CD aix n o� I O nw 4t ��HJq 11� N CD w 3w C 1rj z s z �c � IT, co —i — C -4 p :f•I: FlFi i M I E .1 4^ y 10-06-1997 2:55PtA FROM DAVE BARTLETT 714 894 267.0 fA D. BARTLETT ASSOCIATES LAND USE&PLANNING CONSULTANTS 6082 Jade Circle•Huntington Beach.California 92647 714,898.0600 Fax:714,694.2670•E-mail:dabort@aol.com t! Date: OCTOBER 6, I997 To: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL Fax.x #: 714-374-1557 714 374-1540 Attention: CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK C" RALPH BA UER ,MAYOR .�. �. x Re: ZTA 96-IIZMA 96-61EIR 96-1 MCDONNELL CENTER BUSINESS PARK No. of Pages: 2 irtcl�<<ling cover sheet Dear Mayor Bauer and Members of the City Council: 1 am a resident at 6082:fade Circle, directly east of the proposed project. I am also a land use and planning consultant,having represented local agencies, landowners and developers on various land use issues and projects. I have written Specific Plans as well as reviewed them on behalf of local jurisdictions. I have had my private practice for 1 I years. I am writing as a homeowner that is very interested in making sure the interface between industrial and residential land uses are appropriately addressed and that any proposed mitigation measures be in the best interests of the City of Huntington Beach. There are some modifications and clarifica- tions I would suggest that would be in the best interests of the City and the homeowners adjacent to the project: ❑ For Planning Area 2, maximum building heights should be the same as what has already been approved for Sharp, Cambrio and Dynamic Cooking. If the Council finds it necessary to increase the height limit for Planning Area 2, above and beyond what has already been constructed, the Council should require that additional parkway width and landscaping be provided adjacent to Springdale Street. Other perimeter buffers should also be increased. U �� 1 0—E6-1 99 7 2=55Pt�l FROM DAVE EARTLETT 714 894 2670 P. 2 Huntington Beach City Council October 6, 1997 Page 7 Al Re: McDonnell Center Business Park Specific Plan l7 For.Planning Area 2, adjacent to Springdale Street, there should be no additional curb cuts. Access to the site e from Springdale should be k from Skylab Wa y a only. Considering the exist- ing g zst ing and proposed traffic volumes, controlled ;access at signalized intersection is essential. This should be a condition of approval of the project. ❑ _ for all Planning Areas, the City should require that landscaping be 15%. Because of the 3 intensity of the development, this is not an unreasonable requirement, especially considering that no additional planning materials will be subject to review by any boards, PIanning Commission or City Council to determine if the plaits are sufficient. s ❑ It appears that the mitigation measures outlined for Ttans ortation/Circulate on req uireuire tha t future studies be completed to ensure that impacts are reduced to a level less than significant. } CEQA does not permit mitigation measures that rely on future studies. This issue should be reviewed with your City.Attorney to insure that mitigation measures as proposed are legally A. appropriate under CE Q El Th e City Council should clearly point A nt out to the �' public P b e the, "significant P g unavoidable adverse impacts" that this project would create, as indicated in the EIR and explain why, on balance, this project is good for the community. With the implementation of the Specific Plan, including the above clarifications and modifications, the project will be an asset to the community. Thant:you for the opportunity to comment. COPIES TO, Dave Bartlett A total of 2 pages are being transmitted including this transmittal sheet.. If you do not receive all the pages,or if this fax is received in error,please contact DSA at the phone number Iisted above. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION TO: ROBERT EICHBLATT, CITY ENGINEER FROM: GAIL HUTTON, CITY ATTORNEY DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1995 SUBJECT: RLS#95-428; TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENTS TO SEACLIFF PARTNERS BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department and Seacliff Partners have been negotiating the reimbursement and credit of Traffic Impact Fees related to the construction of the Seapoint Extension and other future projects. Most of the disputed issues have been settled; however, they disagree on the measure of the funds available for reimbursement. ISSUE: What funds are available for reimbursement under Califomia Government Code § 66000 et seq. (A.B. 1600) and Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65? ANSWER: Because the city currently analyzes traffic impact on a "city-wide" basis, the funds available for reimbursement include all traffic impact fees collected pursuant to Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65. ANALYSIS: The issue is nexus. Under state and municipal law, the developer is only entitled to reimbursement from funds which have a nexus to the purpose of the fee. State law establishes the basis for Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65. California Government Code§ 66000(b) provides in relevant part as follows: "Fee" means a monetary exaction, other than a tax or special assessment, which is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project. . . . opinion/95-428rmp/December 8,1995 4a,�e Eichblatt December 8, 1995 page 2 of 3 California Government Code § 66001 provides the requirements of establishing such a fee. The section provides in relevant part as follows: (a) In any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency on or after January 1, 1989, the local agency shall do all of the following: (1) Identify the purpose of the fee. (2) Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. . . . (3) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (4) Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. It is not relevant under California Government Code § 66006 whether the fees collected for different developments are commingled with each other, it is only important that the fees not be commingled with the general fund. Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65 (Traffic Impact Fees) establishes a fee to improve the transportation system of the City under the authority of California Government Code § 66000. Huntington Beach Municipal Code § 17.65.010(a) provides as follows: Each year the city shall prepare a monitoring report. This report shall be used to update the Comprehensive Transportation System Improvement Program (C.T.S.I.P.) hereby established. The Program is a plan, prepared and adopted annually by the city, to address the cumulative impact of development in a defined impact area and to address the funding and construction of transportation facilities in order to achieve and maintain the standard level of service as set forth in the C.T.S.I.P. The City Traffic Engineering Division will be responsible for the preparation and annual update of the Program. The Program will be reviewed and updated during the Fall of each year. The City's Traffic Impact Fee is based upon the C.T.S.I.P. under§ 17.65.020(a). The provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code comply with the state law requirements. The problem, however, is that instead of limiting the 'defined impact area" as allowed by the code, the City has chosen to analyze traffic impact on a city- wide basis. The nexus is the benefit to the City's transportation system as a whole, not only to a particular region or development. opinion/95-428/jmp/December 8,1995 v Eichblatt December 8, 1995 page 3 of 3 The League of Cities has issued an implementation guide on AB 1600 which provides a simplified analysis of the nexus issue. The analysis for Huntington Beach Municipal Code § 17.65 would be: (1) purpose of fee: improve City transportation system (2) use of fee: transportation improvements (3) relationship between use of fee and type of development: City needs certain improvements to maintain the standard level of service (4) relationship between need for facility and type of project: See#3. (5) relationship between amount of fee and cost of the portion of the facility attributed to the development: apply traffic impact fee to development The City is currently preparing a "nexus study"that will address traffic impact on a narrower, more localized basis. When this study is complete, the City can show more localized, project-oriented nexus. CONCLUSION: The funds available include all traffic impact fees as all fees collected thus far are based on a City-wide benefit. Currently, the City Engineer is conducting a new nexus study to establish a more localized nexus such as region or development rather than City-wide. Moreover, Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.65 should be amended to narrow the scope of the fee which, in turn, will reduce the funds available. Sincerely, Gail Hutton City Attorney opinion/95-428/jmp/Dcccmbcr 8,1995 r McDonnell Douglas Master Plan City Council Meeting October 6, 1997 ••L -1- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Introduction. History of the Project. Economic Development Benefits. Public / Private Partnership. -2- r' -- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Zoning Text Amendment No. 96-1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 96-6. Environmental Impact Report No. 96-1. 3 : McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Description of Project Site Location of Project Site. Surrounding Land Uses. General Plan Designation. Zoning Designation. Current Uses at Site. -4- ri - McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Master Plan Concept- Specific Plan > Administration. > Site Plan Review. > Land Use Plan. Circulation Plan. McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Master Plan Concept- Specific Plan (continued) Public Facilities Plan. Design/Architectural Guidelines. Development Regulations. -6- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Master Plan Concept- EIR CEQA Process. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts: 1) Land Use (significant &unavoidable). 2) Transportation (significant, cumulative & unavoidable). -7- -� r McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Master Plan Concept- EIR(continued) 3) Air Quality (significant, project specific, cumulative& unavoidable). 4) Noise (significant, cumulative & unavoidable). 5) Agricultural (significant, cumulative & unavoidable). -s- } -McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Master Plan Concept- EIR(continued) Project Alternatives. Statement of Overriding Considerations. -8- ,�. McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Planning Commission Recommendations Changes to the Specific Plan. Changes to the Environmental Impact Report. -10- .r� McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Summary of Key Issues Upfront Effort (14 Months). Piecemeal Development. Infrastructure Analysis. Site Plan Review. -11- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Summary of Key Issues (continued) Design Guidelines. Development Regulations. Statement of Overriding Considerations. -12- f -- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Planning Commission/ Staff Recommendation > Approval with a Statement of Overriding Considerations. > Consistent with Land Use Element. > Consistent with Economic Development Element. -13- i v. a McDonnell Douglas Master Plan Planning Commission/ Staff Recommendation (continued) > Consistent with Urban Design Element. > With Mitigation Measures & Development Regulations - Project is compatible with Surrounding Land Uses. -14- McDonnell Douglas Master Plan The End...... i -15- i i • ;� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , ., INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION HUNTING ON BEACH TO: Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator Gail Hutton, City Attorney FROM: Connie Brockway, City Clerk DATE: October 3, 1997 SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARDING NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE PROVIDED TO THE CITY CLERK BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—MCDONNELL DOUGLAS PUBLIC HEARING 1016197 Upon returning from vacation I saw the Community Development Department's updated label list P 9 tY Westminster property owners. provided to the Clerk's Office for the above public hearing does not include Wes p p y P The Community Development Department has requested that I discuss with the City Administrator obtaining funding to ensure that property owners living in adjacent cities are notified of pubic hearings by use of updated assessment rolls as are the property owners in Huntington Beach. The Community Development Department has advised that there are not resources to provide a corrected label list for Westminster property owners as they have done for Huntington Beach property owners. The Clerk's Office was questioned as to whether any notices were returned by the Post Office. This is not a valid indicator of sufficiency. The Post Office forwards mail for six months, thus the addressee may no longer own the property yet receive the notice. For the last three years, notification lists have greatly improved; no longer are two years or older lists provided to the City Clerk for mailing. This is appreciated. I am requesting 1. Administration verify prior to the Council meeting, in conjunction with the City Attorney's Office, that legal notification has been met or that the hearing is recommended to be continued. 2. A budget be established for the rare times out-of-city legal notification is required. An intern utilizing the Westminster assessor's rolls would be sufficient. The City of Westminster also utilizes outside sources; however, they maintain hard copy rolls which in cases such as this hearing can be used to update as was done by the Community Development Department for Huntington Beach residents. Attachments: Corrected Labels for Huntington Beach Property Owners Provided to City Clerk for 10/6/97 Hearing City of Westminster Labels (Community Development Department unable to provide corrected list) 9/17/97 Community Development Department Memo Received by City Clerk cbmemos/97-112cg I By 195 052 01 195 072 05 195 223 54 c.,IFk-K Murphy, Chi-Cheng Esther Jania R. Ambrose Caron Glass 19477 Surfset Drive 324 Loth Street 8961 Croupier Drive Huntington Beach Ca 92648 Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 14536411 145 53136 195 081 35 Ferrera, Jerry L. Gorbrand Properties Robert Bruce & Jessie Rose Holmes 1429 Lansing Dr 520 S. Lafayette Park#318 6192 Briarcliff Drive Modesto CA 95350 Los Angeles CA 90057 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 212 01 195 11205 195 072 49 Harris, David B. Argyh Campbell George Gripe 31 Jaeger Lane 332 Via Lido Nord 14391 Elmhurst Circle Alisio Viejo CA 92656 Newport Beach CA 92663 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 012 09 195 223 26 195 19303 David Kuan James H. Storm Robert Pfeffer 924 South Wynnewood Drive Huntington Beach CA 92647 5542 Stardust Drive Diamond Bar CA 91765 Huntington Beach CA 92647 145 543 03 195 072 12 195 031 04 24884 Jim Bridge Road David John Griffis ���' Steve & Deanne Evans Calabasas CA 91302 5958 Westminister Blvd � '� 6071 Ivory Circle Westminister CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 213 15 XO 195 441 39 195 191 14 T. Tmong Lk �a�v Robert& Mary Jaramillo 1) John R Burke 5772 Spa Drive 5151 Churchill Ave 3 14372 Nevada Drive Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminister CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 195 18304 195 19609 145 0145 62, 64 Hoa Van& Kim Dzung Nguyen David Lee Harrington -01 First American Realty 11429 Belcher Street 14481 Spa Drive 5775-C Peachtree-Dunwoody Norwalk CA 90650 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Atlanta GA 30342 195 051 13 195 031 61 Mark, Ronald A Ralph& Ralph Lewis Jr. 5412 Meadow Circle 15471 Cottonwood Circle Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 � y 145 364 17 195 18201 o Hamid Farsai Anthony R& Madeleine M Pacini Sr. 23726 South Pointe #100 5492 Harold Drive Irvine Ca 92603 Huntington Beach CA 92647 a:labels:form I 145 371 017 145 37123 145 531 04 Emmeline J. Schaefer V Maurice & Judith Kramer V/ John Da Pra 6091 Kimberly Dr. 6191 Sydney Dr. 15348 Garfield Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Paramount, CA 90723 145 531 38 145 542 08,10 . 145 542 17 Nicholas F & Deborah E DiBenedetto Allen Antoyan `\Z James R& Sharon Statham 17441 Flower Ln. 868 N. Main St. 7595 Reynolds Cr. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Orange, CA 92868 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 145 542 19 145 542 21 145 531 01 Donald& Pauline Ross Dorothy S & Karie J Lace Jr. Larence Nitta 5811 Woodboro 5561 Engineer Dr. PO Box 54400 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Los Angeles, CA 90054 145 543 04 195 012 05 �Z 195 012 09 V 1018 Assoc Harry F & Phoebe Wanderer David Kuan Wynnewood 5622 Engineer Dr. PO Box 1763 724 S. W y Huntington Beach, CA 92649 San Jacinto, CA 92581 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 195 012 10 195 031 03 195 031 16 Perfect Pizza V� William W Cawthon David A Svoboda 16933 Kawai Ct. PO Box 899 1142 Rainbow Dr. Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Minden, NV 89423 Martinez, CA 94553 195 051 13 195 052 01 195 072 18 Ronald A Mark Chi C E Murphy Andrew Remp 6082 Meadow Cr. 17447 Surfset Dr. 14472 Chateau Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 195 072 28 195 082 03 195 082 08 Sonny K. Chu Jo H rose Diane Del Prado 14411 Danes Cr. 17880 Toiyable St. 14461 Fairview Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 �I Huntington Beach, CA 92647 195 082 09 195 18108 195 19106 Michael L. Benitez Edward Riel Dennis A. Lascola o�� 12222 Merit Dr. #700 17351 Lido Ave. 4880 University Dr. Dallas, TX 75251 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntsville, AZ 35816 195 19207 195 19405 195 202 10 Noguera Family Limited Partnership Sam O Ito Angela Leung Chan 9204 Hays River Cr. '' 11823 Downey Ave. C '�l� �1 10721 Droxford St. #3 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Downey, CA 90241 Cerritos, CA 90703 195 202 08 195 202 24 195 203 08 William Goliff Torab & Behrooz Ahmadi Michael A Harrold 2577 Walnut Ave. #121 19 Muir Beach Cr. 207 Burgan Ave. Signal Hill, CA 90806 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 Clovis, CA 93611 g:Uabels\zta96-1 145 01453 145 531 16;23, 25, 26, 27 145 53128, 29, 17, 18 Michael L Wilkie AEW& LBA Acquisition Co. Domino of CA Inc. 254 Laurel Ave. 4220 Von Karman Ave. #110 520 S. Lafayette Park 4318 Des Plaines, IL 60016 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Los Angeles, CA 90057 145 531 36 195 012 18 195 031 08 Gorbrand Properties Thomas Lee Martin Jeffrey M. Niizawa 520 S. Lafayette Park 4318 23 Halsey 2724 Silver Creek Rd. Los Angeles, CA 92660 Laguna Niguel, Ca 92677 Bullhead City, AZ 86442 195 053 02 195 073 13 195 11205 Patrick J. O'Brien Jr. Rudolf C. & Jeanne a. Preijers Argyle Campbell 6022 Cortez Drive 6303 Wilshire Blvd. 332 Via Lido Nord Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Newport Beach, CA 92663 195 18304 195 185 17 a4- 195 19509 V Hoa Van& Kim Dzung Nguyen +1(l Kevin P. &rhonda H. Maher Anthony Y & Lauren Lee Teng I6� Belcher St. �(vj��1 t 5805 Daltry Ln. 9814 Emmons Circle Norwalk, CA 90650 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 195 195 12 V 195 19610 195 212 14 Alexander William John Patricia Burt Charles Baclet 14462 Spa Dr. 301 Laguna Place PO Box 837 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Midway City, CA 92655 19521302 195 213 04 195 213 07 O M S Orange County Holines Carolyn J. Davidson V Bui, John V PO Box 651 6444 Antigua Place 5672 Spa Drive Cypress, CA 90630 West Hills, CA 91307 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 939 010 04 145 014 21,22 145 014 49 Bolsa Ave. Business Center Argosy Partners LTD Marianne Mueller V 2 Corporate Park#160 545 Via Media 1091 Arden Drive Irvine, CA 92606 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 Encinitas, CA 92024 14501456 v 145 014 62, 64 14501604 Price Alfred & Prince Alfred Herzog S First American Realty Crown Investments 5191 Oceanus Drive 5775-C Peachtree-Dunwoody PO Box 2406 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Atlanta, GA 30342 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 145 016 06 V 145 016 08, 12,13 145 016 15 Frances Lasky Fred Fenster Guy C. Trust clum 5451 Argosy Ave. 3710 S. Robertson Blvd. 200 30 Cowell Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Culver City, CA 90232 Athurton,CA 94027 145 016 21 145 36121 145 371 06 j Kela Pacific Investments Allen L. Ankelein Su-Ling Hong 18281 Gothard #201 16324 Aspen St. 14441 Danes Cr. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 g:\1abe1s\zta96-1 M C g — S P 195 204.110 195 204 16 ' 195 205 08 Anderew E Romer Jerry Y L Chen li°' Larry P & Larry E Manatt L/ 14322 Hacienda Dr. 2200 Karis Drive 15567 Brookhurst St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Bullhead City, AZ 86442 Westminster, CA 92683 01), 195 211 03 195 211 08 195 214 15 - Sok Chang U` William Goliff Todd E Stegan v 16684 Mt. Darwin Cr. 2599 Walnut Ave. #121 1110 Driftwood Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Signal Hill, CA 90806 Seal Beach, CA 90740 195 223 05 195 223 36 Robert S. Warth, Tech. Supv. Erwyn C Wong `,V Arturo Bautista v� Southern CA Gas Company 9092 Colbreggan Drive 5961 Frontier Cr Box 3334 Huntington Beach, CA 92846 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Anaheim, CA 92803-3334 David&Alice Goeke OC Vector Control District Steven R. Conklin, Assoc. Gen. Mgr. \6002 Jade Circle 13001 Garden Grove Blvd. OC Water District Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Garden Grove, CA 92643 Box 8300 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8300 Robert f. Joseph, Chief Peter Mackprang, Civil Eng. Assoc. J David Stein State of CA,Dept. Of Transportation, City of Westminster SCAG District 12 8200 Westminster Blvd. 818 West Seventh, 12th Floor 2501 Pullman Street Westminster, CA 92683 Los Angeles,. CA 90017-3534 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Carl F Goodwin, Consultant for the Dist. Patricia Wolf, Dept. of Fish& Game Antero A.Rivasplata,Chief Public Economics,Inc. 330 Golden Shore, Ste. 50 State of CA 1970-D Old Tustin Ave. Long Beach, CA 90802 Governors Ofc. of Planning&Research Santa Ana,CA 92701 1400 Tenth St. Sacramento,CA 95814 Ben Jarvis,Assoc. Transportation Analyst OCTA 550 South Main St. Orange, CA 92863-1584 C17 g:\1abe1s\zta96-1 rY)e e p- sp McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Supplemental Labels (7/8/97 Public Meeting) David Cop Doug Maclean Gary Powley 5846 Los Alamos Duart Associates McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. Buena Park, CA 90620 17011 Beach Boulevard,#900 4060 Lakewood Blvd., 6th Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Long Beach, CA 90808 Dell DeRevere Dick Harlow Steve Barker DeRevere &Associates 211-13 Main Street McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. 1601 Dove Street, Suite#190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4060 Lakewood Blvd., 6th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 Long Beach, CA 90808 Robert Stickman Chad Fester Susan Vavak Sharp Electronics Corporation Airtech International McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. Sharp Plaza 2542 East Del Amo Blvd. 4060 Lakewood Blvd., 6th Floor 20600 S.Alameda Street P.O. Box 6207 Long Beach, CA 90808 Carson, CA 90818-1105 Carson, CA 90818-6207 Paul E. Cook Dennis Waterkotte Tom Overturf Paul E. Cook& Associates Airtech International McDonnell Douglas Realty Co. 221 Main Street, Suite P 2542 East Del Amo Blvd. 4060 Lakewood Blvd., 6th Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P.O. Box 6207 Long Beach, CA 90808 Carson, CA 90818-6207 HarriX. Wie n John Erskine Jayna Morgan Nossaman, Guthner, Knox&Elliott EDAW, Inc. Lake Shore Towers, Ste. 1800HuntCA 17875 Von Karman Ave., Suite#40 18101 Von Karin an Avenue Irvine, CA 92614 Irvine, CA 92715-1007 Brian Fisk, Dir. of Planning George Britton, Manager Allen Macenski, Chairman City of Westminster Environmental Proj. Planning Div. HB Environmental Board 8200 Westminster Avenue Orange County EMA 20021 Lawson Lane Westminster, CA 92683 PO Box 4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Mike Adams COMMENTING PARTIES Langdon Wilson 1401 Quail Street, Suite #100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 David Ewel Louise Racicot Mike Cormack 14361 Spa Drive 5375 Victoria Place 14351 Spa Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Kent Tucker Rebecca Montecino 5811 Spa Drive 5571 Spa Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 g:labels:form M# M n ,p �j 195 414 01 241 195 414 73 242 195 414 74 243 Freda Kingsbury g Ida Louise Grace David & Joan Hornick 5160 E Los Flores St 14452 Pimlico Rd 5175 Victoria PI Long Beach CA 90815 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 75 244 195 414 76 245 19541477 246 Paul S Pfeifer Geor9 ene E Hanf Peter McGraith rt ,��` 5181 Victoria PI 5185 Victoria PI 5191 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19541478 247 195 414 94 248 195 420 04 249 Fay S Wood ` p ` WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR 4012 Montego Dr 5200 Blackpool Rd Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 46 250 195 422 47 251 195 422 48 252 Sharon L Boles Patricia Lee Hansen Patricia Lee Hansen 14325 Blackpool Rd 16022 Atkinson Ave 16022 Atkinson Ave Westminster CA 92683 Gardena CA 90249 Gardena CA 90249 195 422 49 253 195 422 50 254 195 422 51 255 Arthur C Robertson Raymond Blackman Judith K Earley 14341 Blackpool Rd 5371 Victoria PI 5365 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542252 256 195 422 53 257 195 422 54 258 Dixie Goble Guy J Cross Joseph Chel L Neumann 5361 Victoria PI t 5355 Victoria PI 5331 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542255 259 195 422 56 260 195 422 75 261 Herbert Leo & Stephanie Jean Norton Ruth E Richards Charles A Wilson 5325 Charing Cross Rd rl J��' 5321 Cl-aring Cross Rd 5302 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542276 262 p 195 422 77 263 195 422 78 264 Lourdes K W Lee Philip Cordova Phyllis Mays 24000 Alicia Pkwy #17-226 5312 Charing Cross Rd 5316 Charing Cross Rd Mission Viejo CA 92691 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542279 265 195 422 80 266 195 422 81 267 Charles A Patterson Paula L Fisher WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 5322 Charing Cross Rd 1527 Solano Dr NE 20062 Lawson Ln Westminster CA 92683 Albuquerque NM 87110 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 422 82 268 195 422 85 269 195 423 02 270 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW Angelica Villicana 20062 Lawson Ln 20062 Lawson Ln 5166 Victoria PI Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Westminster CA 92683 C (-n (� aP- sue a,-.-� o• - 3 0 195 414 01 241 19541473 242 195 414 74 243 Freda Kingsbury Ida Louise Grace David & Joan Hornick 5160 E Los Flores St 14452 Pimlico Rd 5175 Victoria PI Long Beach CA 90815 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 75 244 195 414 76 245 195 414 77 246 Paul S Pfeifer Georgene E Hanf Peter McGraith 5181 Victoria PI 5185 Victoria PI 5191 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 78 247 195 414 94 248 195 420 04 249 Fay S Wood WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR 4012 Montego Dr 5200 Blackpool Rd Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 46 250 195 422 47 251 195 422 48 252 Sharon L Boles Patricia Lee Hansen Patricia Lee Hansen 14325 Blackpool Rd 16022 Atkinson Ave 16022 Atkinson Ave Westminster CA 92683 Gardena CA 90249 Gardena CA 90249 195 422 49 253 19542250 254 19542251 255 Arthur C Robertson Raymond Blackman Judith K Earley 14341 Blackpool Rd 5371 Victoria PI 5365 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542252 256 19542253 257 195 422 54 258 Dixie Goble Guy J Cross Joseph Chel L Neumann 5361 Victoria PI 5355 Victoria PI 5331 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542255 259 195 422 56 260 195 422 75 261 Herbert Leo & Stephanie Jean Norton Ruth E Richards Charles A Wilson 5325 Charing Cross Rd 5321 Ci-aring Cross Rd 5302 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 76 262 195 422 77 263 195 422 78 264 Lourdes K W Lee Philip Cordova Phyllis Mays 24000 Alicia Pkwy #17-226 5312 Charing Cross Rd 5316 Charing Cross Rd Mission Viejo CA 92691 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542279 265 19542280 266 195 422 81 267 Charles A Patterson Paula L Fisher WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 5322 Charing Cross Rd 1527 Solano Dr NE 20062 Lawson Ln Westminster CA 92683 Albuquerque NM 87110 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 422 82 268 195 422 85 269 195 423 02 270 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW Ange51661ica V Victoria PI a 20062 Lawson Ln 20062 Lawson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Westminster CA 92683 Fne- a P- s- ou 195 423 03 271 195 423 04 272 195 423 05 273 S & Sue Ellen Omsted Jeannette Webeler Williams Dong II Lee 5172 Victoria PI 17965 Arbolada Way 5182 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Tustin CA 92780 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 06 274 195 423 07 275 195 423 08 276 Sherry E Swan Kenneth Lawrence Renk Charles William Lander 5186 Victoria PI 5192 Victoria PI 5200 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 09 277 195 423 10 278 195 423 11 279 Bozidar Nikolic Teresa L Gartland Mark Aurelius 5202 Victoria PI PO Box 51 5212 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Trabuco Canyon CA 92678 Westminster CA 92683 `J 01 195 423 12 280 ( �1 195 423 13 281 195 423 14 282 Barbara Virginia Owens '�Uc Janiec R Thiessen Helen G Engelbart 721 April Dr 5222 Victoria PI 5226 Victoria PI Huntington Beach CA 92648 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 15 283 195 423 43 284 195 423 44 285 Thomas & Glenda Sumrall Donna K Svoboda Raymond M Battee 14421 Suffolk St 5296 Charing Cross Rd 5325 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 45 286 195 423 46 287 195 423 47 288 Donald A Mackenzie Robert J Elkins Milton S Thompson 5321 Victoria PI 176 Yale Ln 1670 E Broad St#140 Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 Statesville NC 28677 195 423 48 289 195 423 49 290 195 423 50 291 Norman Leon McMullen William H Boehmler Steven & Katherine Blackmarr 39 Outrigger Ct 5811 Amaro Dr 5291 Victoria PI Long Beach CA 90803 San Diego CA 92124 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 51 292 195 423 52 293 195 423 53 294 Iva Frances Scott Marlene A Zimmerman Louise A Racicot 5285 Victoria PI 5281 Victoria PI 5275 Victoria PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 54 295 195 423 55 296 195 423 61 297 Brian K& Martin Edwards David Silin WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 5271 Victoria Pi 14422 Suffolk St 20062 Lawson Ln Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 423 63 298 195 423 64 299 195 423 65 300 WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 Lawson Ln 20062 Lawson Ln 20062 Lawson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 a r�r'zl- 300 , moo 195 383 03 1036 195 383 04 1037 195 383 05 1038 Mark Lennart Larson William R Pence Robert L Dutro 14162 Enfield Cir 14172 Enfield Cir 14176 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 06 1039 195 383 07 1040 195 383 08 1041 James S Fearn Al D Salinas Johann K Mueller 14182 Enfield Cir 14192 Enfield Cir 14202 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 09 1042 195 383 10 1043 195 383 11 1044 June Carol Jacques Monaco Bette K Del Samuel & Ng Cho 14212 Enfield Cir 14222 Enfield Cir 14232 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 12 1045 195 383 13 1046 195 383 14 1047 Lily Monji Gilbert A Diaz Richard J Van Camp 14242 Enfield Cir 14261 Uxbridge St 14251 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 15 1048 195 383 16 1049 195 383 17 1050 Michael Dennis Jolly Gary Kaplan Nam Lai 14241 Uxbridge St 14235 Uxbridge St 14231 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 18 1051 195 383 19 1052 195 383 20 1053 Tom Behlmer Jeffrey K Thompson Stanley Fu 14221 Uxbridge St 14211 Uxbridge St 14201 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 21 1054 195 383 22 1055 195 383 23 1056 Carroll Dailey Jr. Takashi Hirano Donald R &Zorka D Jackson 14181 Uxbridge St 14171 Uxbridge St 14161 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 383 24 1057 195 383 25 1058 195 384 01 1059 Steven Ehrenkranz Donald E Gavert Josephine R McDonald 14151 Uxbridge St 14141 Uxbridge St 5322 Horsham Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 02 1060 195 384 03 1061 195 384 04 1062 Julio L Pongco Edward J Murphy Jr. Debbie Dunning 5332 Horsham Ave 5336 Horsham Ave 5342 Horsham Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 05 1063 195 384 06 1064 195 384 07 1065 John Osborne Bobby G Durant Sandy Chih Hui Liu 5352 Horsham Ave 5356 Horsham Ave 5425 Snyder Ln 966 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Rohnert Park CA 94928 s6D o2r� � 300 '— I 000 ' 195 384 08 1066 195 384 09 1067 195 384 10 1068 Alfredo Fernandez Douglas L Madland Enriquea Torres 5372 Horsham Ave 5376 Horsham Ave 5382 Horsham Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 17 1069 195 384 18 1070 195 384 19 1071 Robert A Berg Paul Perlow David DiProfio 14242 Uxbridge St 14236 Uxbridge St 14232 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 20 1072 195 384 21 1073 195 384 22 1074 Kevin D Mills William E Zaehring Michael Matsumoto 14222 Uxbridge St 14216 Uxbridge St 14212 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 23 1075 195 384 24 1076 195 384 25 1077 Ronald O Sampson John P Follis Andrew M Yager 14202 Uxbridge St 4372 Elder Ave 14192 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 26 1078 195 384 27 1079 195 384 28 1080 John R Hollinger Lorraine F Cook Steve Yoshizaki 14182 Uxbridge St 14172 Uxbridge St 14162 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 29 1081 195 384 30 1082 195 384 32 1083 Ronald &Jennie Neal Matthew Farrelly Ralph James McKinney 14152 Uxbridge St 14142 Uxbridge St 5302 Horsham Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 384 33 1084 195 384 34 1085 195 384 35 1086 Rachel H Black Rodney M Ems Patricia McVicar 103 E Hypericum Ln 865 E 7th Ave 5292 Horsham Ave Greenville SC 29615 Durango CO 81301 Westminster CA 92683 195 391 21 1087 195 391 22 1088 195 391 23 1089 William R Belisle Charles E Hawley Jung Ah Chung 5241 Hartford Way 14112 Uxbridge St 14122 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 391 24 1090 195 391 25 1091 195 393 01 1092 Leland F Woodard ORANGE CO NTY FLOOD CONTR Robert E Dutcher 2 Grenada Ct C 5382 Tattershall Ave Manhattan Beach CA 90266 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 02 1093 195 393 03 1094 195 393 04 1095 James F Williams William Paul Hurban William & Marit Macdonald 5392 Tattershall Ave 5402 Tattershall Ave 5412 Tattershall Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 3? meaP - sF 195 393 05 1096 195 393 06 1097 195 393 07 1098 Charles R Olsen John Xuan Phan Lloyd H Tanabe 5422 Tattershall Ave 5432 Tattershall Ave 5442 Tattershall Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 08 1099 195 393 09 1100 195 393 10 1101 James E & Mary Foster Kendle & Maria Marshall John Mafrica 5452 Tattershall Ave 5462 Tattershall Ave 5472 Tattershall Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 11 1102 195 393 12 1103 195 393 13 1104 Henry Hien S Nguyen John & Candice Shulek Arthur J Cheshire Jr. 14101 Uxbridge St 14111 Uxbridge St 14121 Uxbridge St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 14 1105 195 393 15 1106 195 393 16 1107 Kevin & Kimberly Francis Paul E Frey Mary W Storms 14131 Uxbridge St 14132 Enfield Cir 14122 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 17 1108 195 393 18 1109 195 393 19 1110 Toby & Kiersten Turrell Richard C & Micheline A Varnum Christopher& Miyuki Williams 14112 Enfield Cir 14102 Enfield Cir 14111 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 20 1111 195 393 21 1112 195 393 22 1113 Edgar L Palacol Bob A Rossi William M & Susan K Willis 14121 Enfield Cir 14131 Enfield Cir 14141 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 23 1114 195 393 24 1115 195 393 25 1116 James J Zapalac Christopher J Richgels Uluc A Davasligil 14136 Sawston Cir 14132 Sawston Cir 14122 Sawston Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 26 1117 195 393 27 1118 195 393 28 1119 Alfred Risi Thomas W Tapp Gary M Okura 14112 Sawston Cir 14111 Sawston Cir 14121 Sawston Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 393 29 1120 195 393 30 1121 195 393 31 1122 Albert M Akiyama Robert &Anne Johansen Kenneth A&Wendy P Kadlec 14131 Sawston Cir 13052 Stanton 5311 Sierra Roja Rd Westminster CA 92683 Santa Ana CA 92705 Irvine CA 92612 195 393 32 1123 195 393 33 1124 195 393 34 1125 Harold E Miller Jr. Kan-Sen R Chiang Vernon E Davis 14112 Ipswich St 18062 Lincoln St 5352 Tattershall Ave Westminster CA 92683 Villa Park CA 92861 Westminster CA 92683 39 • �n-dt �..�- 3 d d '-- r o as 195 393 35 1126 195 393 36 1127 195 394 01 1128 Thomas S Buenafe Johann Kraus CITY OF WES INSTER 5362 Tattershall Ave 5372 Tattershall Ave City Hall Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 West to CA 92683 195 414 02 1129 195 414 03 1130 195 414 04 1131 Elsie 0 Anderson Charles D Bopf Sandra Ann Buccola 14426 Baker St 14422 Baker St 14416 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 05 1132 195 414 06 1133 195 414 07 1134 Donald W Pageler Theodore W Walker Dympna Espinoza 14412 Baker St 14406 Baker St 14402 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19541408 1135 195 414 09 1136 195 414 10 1137 Patricia M Rotell Charles R Schwab Albert W & Roberta E Landeck 14396 Baker St 14392 Baker St 14382 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 11 1138 195 414 12 1139 195 414 13 1140 Erik Rosenberg Lloyd P Pardee Robert E Jones 14376 Baker St 14372 Baker St 14366 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 14 1141 195 414 15 1142 195 414 16 1143 Frances M Sawyer Elizabeth L Bragg Beatrice Carrier 14362 Baker St 14356 Baker St 14352 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 17 1144 195 414 18 1145 195 414 19 1146 Juanita J Newman Billy Jack Long Roy &Annabelle Richards 625 Beachcomber Dr 14342 Baker St 14336 Baker St Seal Beach CA 90740 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 20 1147 195 414 21 1148 195 414 22 1149 Sharon J Alfonso Penelope L O'Toole Robert J Brewer 14332 Baker St 14326 Baker St 14322 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 23 1150 195 414 24 1151 195 414 29 1152 Tom Joseph &Judith L Rice Jeannette 0 King William L Fleming 14316 Baker St 14312 Baker St 14315 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 30 1153 195 414 31 1154 195 414 32 1155 Jane C O'Brien John M Satjiaka Evelyn M Thissell 14321 Baker St 14325 Baker St 14331 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 n39 Me 195 414 33 1156 195 414 34 1157 195 414 35 1158 Sharii�n n en Robert Riggins Kenneth R Barton 5201 00l Rd 14341 Baker St 14361 Baker St Wesster GA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 36 1159 19541437 1160 195'414 38 1161 Rita McMahon Charles J Woods Julia M Pender 14365 Baker St 14371 Baker St 14375 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 39 1162 195 414 40 1163 195 414 41 1164 Jean Andersson John D Brady Jr. Norman Berlinger 14381 Baker St 16681 Carousel Ln 20622 Reef Ln Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 414 42 1165 19541443 1166 195 41444 1167 Robert Haluska William M Brennan Robert & Gail Dutton 5135 Hampton Ct 5131 Hampton Ct 7 Shasta Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Irvine CA 92612 195 414 45 1168 195 414 46 1169 195 414 47 1170 Donald H Berndt Helen F Lefevers Nancy Lee Blackman 5105 Hampton Ct 5101 Hampton Ct 5095 Hampton Ct Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 48 1171 195 414 49 1172 19541455 1173 Michael H Schmidt Monica Pedersen Irving Crowther 5091 Hampton Ct 5085 Hampton Ct 5076 Hampton Ct Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19541456 1174 195 414 57 1175 19541458 1176 Gregory V & Carolyn E Peterson Ruth E Lederer Paul J & Stephanie D Hankins 5082 Hampton Ct 5086 Hampton Ct 5092 Hampton Ct Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 59 1177 195 414 60 1178 195 414 61 1179 Kathleen Dixon Henry F Amero Diethelm & Deanna Jean Brandt 5096 Hampton Ct 5102 Hampton Ct 16498 El Hito Ct Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Pacific Palisades CA 902.72 195 414 62 1180 195 414 63 1181 195 414 64 1182 Robert Stonis Janet Wilson Charles Richard Eis 5112 Hampton Ct 5116 Hampton Ct 11256 Pinto Ct Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Jacksonville FL 32225 195 414 65 1183 195 414 66 1184 195 414 67 1185 Carol Lynn Swanson Barbara A Larson Ann L Coleman 14416 Pimlico Rd 14422 Pimlico Rd 14426 Pimlico Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 co �c 63 F - S'f • ���,�, 3bD'- load ' 195 414 68 1186 195 414 69 1187 195 414 70 1188 Robert L Rattray William R Mondschein Geraldine S Jackson 14432 Pimlico Rd 14436 Pimlico Rd 14442 Pimlico Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 71 1189 195 414 72 1190 195 414 79 1191 Marlene Shaw Ida L Grace Adelen Strozier 14446 Pimlico Rd 14452 Pimlico Rd 14441 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 80 1192 195 414 81 1193 195 414 82 1194 Sharon Sammann Cedro G Valencia Martin E Petersen 1115 Ridgecrest Cir 14431 Baker St 14421 Baker St Costa Mesa CA 92627 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 414 83 1195 195 414 84 1196 195 414 85 1197 William Hugh Smith Sr. Robbie D Stahl Ralph D Keays 14415 Baker St 5201 Blackpool Rd 5664 Apia Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Cypress CA 90630 195 414 86 1198 195 414 87 1199 19541488 1200 Robert F Holmberg Marilyn Tien Erwin H Metz 14401 Baker St 14395 Baker St 14391 Baker St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19541489 1201 195 414 90 1202 19541491 1203 Ted & Kathryn L Miller Glenn R H Carter Emily A Frazier 5146 Hampton Ct 5142 Hampton Ct 131 13th St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 195 414 92 1204 195 414 93 1205 195 414 96 1206 Joanne Hedgespeth Patricia L Heady WESTMI S ILLAGE HOMEOW 5132 Hampton Ct 8342 Arnett Dr 20062 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 414 97 1207 195 414 98 1208 19541499 1209 WESTM NSTE VILLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINST R VILLAGE HOMEOW WEST INST R VILLAGE HOMEOW 2006 20�gtn n 200 n Hunt gton Beach CA 92646 Hh CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 195 421 03 1210 195 421 04 1211 195 421 05 1212 Susan F Crowl Terryll J Castillo Wendy Malott 14291 Suffolk St 14295 Suffolk St 14301 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 06 1213 195 421 07 1214 195 421 08 1215 Colleen G Rice Doris P Hinsche George L Murphy 14305 Suffolk. St 14311 Suffolk St 14315 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 S 6' c9x9+�. 195 421 09 1216 195 421 10 1217 195 421 11 1218 Barbara J Fleig Helen Hnatow Patti Harrison 14321 Suffolk St 14325 Suffolk St 14331 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 12 1219 195 421 13 1220 195 421 14 1221 Patti L Harrison Edward & Mary Joan Welz Rose Piotrowski 14331 Suffolk St 825 Driftwood Ave 14346 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 Westminster CA 92683 1115 4I-A 55 195 421 15 1222 195 421 16 1223 195 421 17 1224 GREENBERG REAL ESTATE SALES Christopher Bogiagis Sharon L Lundgren 14342 Suffolk St 14336 Suffolk St 5201 Blackpool Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 18 1225 195 421 19 1226 19542120 1227 Nimia P Ong John F Howlett Warren H Hutchens 14326 Suffolk St 14322 Suffolk St 14316 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 21 1228 195 421 22 1229 195 421 23 1230 Hans E Goldsmith Neil Campbell Jimmy & Kathy Alarcon 14306 Suffolk St 14302 Suffolk St 14296 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 24 1231 195 421 49 1232 195 421 50 1233 J Randall Coleman De Wayne O Jacobs Arthur L Fountain 14292 Suffolk St 5285 Saint George Rd 5281 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 51 1234 195 421 52 1235 195 421 53 1236 Jo Ann Baumgardner Jerry L Isham Maria E Van Tyen 5275 Saint George Rd 5271 Saint George Rd 5265 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 54 1237 195 421 55 1238 195 421 56 1239 Eugenia R Kluever Judy Garris Patricia A O'Brien 5261 Saint George Rd 5255 Saint George Rd 5251 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 57 1240 195 421 58 1241 195 421 59 1242 Robin Jaffee Vernon E (No) Smith Edgar B Fleming 5245 Saint George Rd 5241 Saint George Rd 9327 Somerset Ln Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Cypress CA 90630 195 421 60 1243 195 421 61 1244 195 421 62 1245 Virginia B McFarland Peter M & Christine I Lowentrout Mark & Deborah Moss 5245 Tufton St 5225 Saint George Rd 5221 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 �a ('�CQP- Sf 195 421 63 1246 195 421 64 1247 195 421 65 1248 Carol Anne Raab Carolyn Black Herbert G Lotter 5211 Saint George Rd 5201 Tufton St 521.1 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 66 1249 195 421 67 1250 19542168 1251 Betty J Miller Charlotte Lynn Johnson Richard E Hatfield 5215 Tufton St 908 4th Ave 5231 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Brooklyn NY 11232 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 69 1252 195 421 70 1253 195 421 71 1254 Richard A Ireton Richard E O'Hara Virginia B McFarland 5235 Tufton St 5241 Tufton St 5245 Tufton St Westminster A C 92683 West minster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 72 1255 195 421 73 1256 195 421 74 1257 Randy Charles Boyle Norbert F Smith Ruth E Plax 5251 Tufton St 101 Jerdone Rd 5212 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Williamsburg VA 23185 Westminster CA 92683 3 195 421 75 1258 195 421 76 1259 195 421 77 1260 John H Hook William C &Jeanne L Russell Lawrence& Virginia Fairman 5222 Saint George Rd 5232 Saint George Rd 5236 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 78 1261 195 421 79 1262 195 421 80 1263 Sandra Marie Escalle Gordon S Isaacson Marty Bowman 17021 Avenida Abuelitos 5246 Saint George Rd 5252 Saint George Rd Fountain Valley CA 92708 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 81 1264 195 421 82 1265 195 421 83 1266 Karen A Lee Wallace A Grotenhuis Sharon D Rowell 5256 Saint George Rd 5262 Saint George Rd 5266 Saint George Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 421 84 1267 195 421 85 1268 195 421 86 1269 WESTMINSTER V LLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINST R VI GE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMEOW 20062 20062 La 20062 L Hunti on ach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntin n Bea CA 92646 195 421 87 1270 195 421 88 1271 195 421 90 1272 WESTMIf�jSTE�AGE HOMEOW WESTMIN TER V LAGE HOMEOW WESTMIN TER VI AGE HOMEOW 20062 20062 L 20062 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntin on B ach CA 92646 Huntington B ach CA 92646 195 421 91 1273 195 422 01 1274 195 422 02 1275 WESTMINSTER V LAGE HOMEOW Linda Helen Ritchie Victor M Chavarria 20062 La r 14231 Blackpool Rd 14235 Blackpool Rd Huntin ch CA 92646 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Me6F se 19542203 1276 195 422 04 1277 195 422 05 1278 Karen L Coopper Candy Cullison Cordelia Howard 14241 Blackpool Rd 14245 Blackpool Rd 14251 Blackpool Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 06 1279 195 422 07 1280 195 422 08 1281 Carol Ann Justis Ralph F Sievers Jr. Nancy J Hazelton 14255 Blackpool Rd 14261 Blackpool Rd 6 Harbor Way #226 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Santa Barbara CA 93109 195 422 09 1282 195 422 10 1283 195 422 11 1284 Walter B Crawford Kenneth B White Robert Ernest Staeck 14271 Blackpool Rd 14275 Blackpool Rd 14281 Blackpool Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 12 1285 195 422 13 1286 195 422 14 1287 Gordon J Rae Stephen &Ann Barratt Linda J Nesler-Winter 5811 Ludlow Ave 14291 Blackpool Rd 5180 Piccadilly Cir Garden Grove CA 92845 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 15 1288 195 422 16 1289 195 422 17 1290 Michael B Nelson Audrey M Russo May Woodward 14301 Blackpool Rd 300 E Coast Hwy#290 5312 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Newport Beach CA 92660 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 18 1291 195 422 19 1292 195 422 20 1293 Ronnie Clare DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF STATE Jon D Chrostowski 5306 Tufton St 5302 Tufton St 5296 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 21 1294 195 422 22 1295 195 422 23 1296 Betty J White Marjorie M McDonald Robert S Hodson 5292 Tufton St 5286 Tufton St 5282 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 24 1297 195 422 25 1298 195 422 26 1299 Philip& Michele Delapp Helen L Hamilton Eleonore Winterfeld 5276 Tufton St 5272 Tufton St 5266 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 27 1300 195 422 28 1301 195 422 29 1302 { Richard A Breese Andrea Brown Rodger K Coombs 5262 Tufton St 5261 Tufton St 5265 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 30 1303 195 422 31 1304 195 422 32 1305 Peggy J Morrill Phyllis G Kieffe William W Potter 5271 Tufton St 5275 Tufton St 5281 Tufton St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 �`4 MCQ P - Se r r-A --Roo' - i o0 19542233 1306 195 422 34 1307 195 422 35 1308 Okla Bryan Katherine E Royal Dorothy W Bagge 5285 Tufton St 9152 Carnation Dr 24711 Via Alvorado Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Mission Viejo CA 92692 195 422 36 1309 195 422 37 1310 195 422 38 1311 Harry Williams Thomas D Tona Sandra Lallement 101 Electric Ave 5305 Tufton St 5311 Tufton St Seal Beach CA 90740 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542239 1312 195 422 40 1313 195 422 41 1314 R Anthony Salcido Neal O'Bryan Neal O'Bryan 5315 Tufton St 5321 Tufton St 53 St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 42 1315 195 422 43 1316 195 422 44 1317 Margaret Harey Robert E Hodgdon John &Stacy Ward 5331 Tufton St 14311 Blackpool Rd 14315 Blackpool Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 45 1318 195 422 57 1319 19542258 1320 Patricia Hansen AVEC SOUCI LIMITED PARTNERSHI Robert A Weidemann 14321 Blackpool Rd 5315 Charing Cross Rd 5311 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542259 1321 195 422 60 1322 195 422 61 1323 Patricia E Hardy Foster James A Gray Ira L Butler 5305 Charing Cross Rd 5301 Charing Cross Rd 5295 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 62 1324 195 422 63 1325 195 422 64 1326 Ethel V Field Harry & Lynne Bogosian Robert L Reyes 5291 Charing Cross Rd 5285 Charing Cross Rd 5281 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 65 1327 195 422 66 1328 195 422 67 1329 Beverly J Wong Horst K Steinhart James A & Mary K Buccola 5275 Charing Cross Rd 16417 Ladona Cir 5261 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 195 422 68 1330 195 422 69 1331 195 422 70 1332 Lambertus & Elke Van Velden Samuel Zolna Patricia Lynn Giarratano 5255 Charing Cross Rd 5251 Charing Cross Rd 5245 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19542271 1333 195 422 72 1334 195 422 73 1335 Charlette Torres Edwina Rollo Alice M Carter 5241 Charing Cross Rd 5235 Charing Cross Rd 464 Schooner Way Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Seal Beach CA 90740 �s �c� P—sP m Fio7C s b b - t 06 { 195 422 74 1336 195442283 1337 195 422 84 1338 Don F Hart WESTMI ST LLAGE HOMEOW WESTMINSTER VILLAGE HOMED 5225 Charing Cross Rd 20062 Ln 5200 Blackpool Rd Westminster CA 92683 Hunti gtonleach CA 92646 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 16 1339 195 423 17 1340 195 423 18 1341 Irene Chavez Lee A Bell Jr. Warren H Wilmot 22291 Butterfield 14411 Suffolk St 14405 Suffolk St Mission Viejo CA 92692 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 19 1342 195 423 20 1343 195 423 21 1344 Denise Steele David C Rosenblum Diana Chatterton 14401 Suffolk St 10853 Country Pond Ln 14391 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Oakton VA 22124 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 22 1345 195 423 23 1346 195 423 24 1347 Helen Robideaux Donald G Isaacson Karon Morgan 14385 Suffolk St 14381 Suffolk St 14375 Suffolk St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 25 1348 195 423 26 1349 195 423 27 1350 Julia M Menozzi Julie &Yan Chow William D Brigham 14371 Suffolk St 51 Robert Rd 18261 Oldgate Ln Westminster CA 92683 Orinda CA 94563 Huntington Beach CA 92648 195 423 28 1351 195 423 29 1352 195 423 30 1353 Grace M Woodle J Garland Whitaker Edward Miller 14355 Suffolk St 14351 Suffolk St 18191 Ivorycrest Ln Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92648 195 423 31 1354 195 423 32 1355 195 423 33 1356 Larry Gene Goodrich Al Jack& Elaine Fitzgerald Fafilek Treamon R Davis 5232 Charing Cross Rd 5236 Charing Cross Rd 5242 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 34 1357 195 423 35 1358 195 423 36 1359 Phyllis Foster Pamela Y Thames Marilyn Cason 5246 Charing Cross Rd 5252 Charing Cross Rd 5256 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 37 1360 195 423 38 1361 195 423 39 1362 Laura Hutchinson Donald R Wittenberg Eunice Hodges 5262 Charing Cross Rd 5272 Charing Cross Rd 5276 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 423 40 1363 195 423 41 1364 195 423 42 1365 Steven E Glance Patricia Whipple Donald R Singer 5311 Loyola Ave 5286 Charing Cross Rd 5292 Charing Cross Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 I add ' 19542356 1366 195 423 57 1367 195 423 58 1368 Esta Daly Gale Carson Klaus C Brandt 624 Windsor Way#A 16082 Santa Barbara Ln 401 Wynola St Jamesburg NJ 08831 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Pacific Palisades CA 90272 19542359 1369 195 423 60 1370 195 432 07 1371 Emil B Karawan Andrea L Kingery James J Bean s 14402 Suffolk St 1415 S Bundy Dr#6 14132 Montgomery Dr Westminster CA 92683 Los Angeles CA 90025 Westminster CA 92683 195 432 08 1372 195 432 09 1373 195 432 10 1374 Robert L Wadsworth Phyllis Charlene Hall Don Carlos Atkins III 14152 Milan St 14171 Milan St 14151 Milan St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 432 11 1375 195 432 12 1376 195 432 13 1377 Riley J Quayle Daniel W& Pamela M Munzer Coleen G Spalsbury 14141 Milan St 14131 Milan St 14121 Milan St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19544101 1378 195 441 02 1379 195 441 03 1380 Larry Griffin George A Sehremelis Leland & Diane Hill 14471 Southfield Dr 3221 Lilly Ave 14451 Southfield Dr Westminster CA 92683 Long Beach CA 90808 Westminster CA 92683 i 195 441 04 1381 195 441 05 1382 195 441 06 1383 Henri Van Straalen Roy P Covert Gerald R& Jean C Wampler 14441 Southfield Dr 14442 Southfield Dr 14452 Southfield Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19544107 1384 195 441 08 1385 195 441 09 1386 Joseph Boodman Darrell G Allison Richard M Blumenthal 14462 Southfield Dr 14472 Southfield Dr 5041 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 10 1387 195 441 11 1388 195 441 12 1389 Edward C Steinhaus Edward O Robinson Michael L Hauxhurst 5061 Churchill Ave 5071 Churchill Ave 5081 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 13 1390 195 441 14 1391 195 441 15 1392 Susan Bell George Carl Faletto David E Roberts 5091 Churchill Ave 5101 Churchill Ave 14461 Birmingham Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 16 1393 195 441 17 1394 195 441 18 1395 Lee H Way Chieu Nguyen Thomas H Kunisaki 14451 Birmingham Dr 5082 Marlowe Cir 5072 Marlowe Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 (ii) P-�c 8 P- SIP rn� - ?,Oa' - 1 ood' 195 441 19 1396 195 441 20 1397 195 441 21 1398 James Strinden Long Dinh Tran Aquilina S DeJesus 5062 Marlowe Cir 5052 Marlowe Cir 5051 Marlowe Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 22 1399 195 441 23 1400 195 441 24 1401 Thomas A Smith Judith C Ahonen Ronald V & Kathleen L Davis 5061 Marlowe Cir 5071 Marlowe Cir 14401 Birmingham Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 25 1402 195 441 26 1403 195 441 27 1404 Harold &Wendi Rothman Darlene Lorelli Bruce Sandler PO Box 5128 9521 Charlene Cir 14382 Birmingham Dr Garden Grove CA 92846 Garden Grove CA 92841 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 28 1405 195 441 29 1406 195 441 30 1407 Dorothy H Rebak John Howford Laurel Zober 14392 Birmingham Dr 14396 Birmingham Dr 14402 Birmingham Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 31 1408 195 441 32 1409 195 441 33 1410 Byron Kunimura Michele J O'Connor William J Ackerman 14412 Birmingham Dr 14422 Birmingham Dr 14432 Birmingham Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 34 1411 195 441 35 1412 195 441 36 1413 Ralph K Compton Glenn M Nakadate William E & Dorothy B Myers Jr. 14442 Birmingham Dr 14452 Birmingham Dr 14462 Birmingham Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 37 1414 195 441 38 1415 195 441 46 1416 Marcus R Young Randall V & Sandra L Sowle Brian H Md & Rebecca A Casull 5121 Churchill Ave 5141 Churchill Ave 5092 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 47 1417 195 441 48 1418 195441 49 1419 Benjamin A Legaspi Rick & Diana Bachman Johnny Wang 5082 Churchill Ave 5072 Churchill Ave 5062 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 441 50 1420 195 441 51 1421 195 442 01 1422 Peter P Sevilla Ugo Vigorito Dianna Weaver 5042 Churchill Ave 5032 Churchill Ave 5002 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 442 02 1423 195 451 01 1424 195 451 02 1425 Athanasios K Syrengelas Anthony Delfrancisco Francis Tadashi Yamane 4249 Elder Ave 1221 Pacific Coast Hwy #1 14531 Southfield Dr Seal Beach CA 90740 Newport Beach CA 92660 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 03 1426 195 451 04 1427 195 451 05 1428 Dalisay H Ecat John B Shepard Jr. Karen E Pittman 14541 Southfield Dr 14551 Southfield Dr 14561 Southfield Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 22 1429 195 451 23 1430 195 451 24 1431 Charles L Lantz Alexander M Rubens Trung Hoang Pham 5071 Gillingham Cir 5061 Gillingham Cir 14532 Southfield Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 25 1432 939 010 46,-17 1433 939 010 47 1434 Chi Shuang Liu Darryl L Hann Darryl L Hann 5581 Lutford Cir 5381 Oceanus Dr 5381 O Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington �ch 92649 939 010 48," 1435 939 010 49 1436 Gratzer Hans Gratzer�oneach 5411 Oceanus Dr 5411 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hun ' gCA 92649 195 441 39 301 195 441 40 302 195 441 41 303 STATE STREET BANK &TR ST CO Christoph B & Laila D Riechert Edward Daoud 5151 Churchill Ave 5161 Churchill Ave 5152 Churchill Ave ' Westminster CA 92683 ' Westminster CA 92683 ' ` + Westminster CA 92683 195 441 42 304 I 195 441 43 305 195 441 44 306 Anthony F & Maria Acevedo CHURCHILL LIMITED PARTNERSHI Jagdish S Sekhon 5142 Churchill Ave 5122 Churchill Ave 5112 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 ' Westminster CA 92683 195 441 45 307 195 441 52 308 195 441 53 309 Peter Greatbatch ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR 5102 Churchill Ave Westminster CA 92683 j I 195 451 06 310 I 195 451 07 311 195 451 08 312 Peter H Mueggler G LeBao i ,i' George &Josephine Attard 14571 Southfield Dr 14581 Southfield Dr 14591 Southfield Dr .- Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 09 313 195 451 10 314 195 451 11 315 James J &Julie Flood Thomas L & Lynn E Dewitt /1 _ Thomas Cady f '` 14582 Southfield Dr 14572 Southfield Dr 5052 Gillingham Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 12 316 195 451 13 317 195 451 14 318 Thomas D Holder Kurien Joseph Jacinto S Soriano 5062 Gillingham Cir 5082 Gillingham Cir t 5092 Gillingham Cir t Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 15 319 195 451 16 320 _ 195 451 17 321 Albert Aldoroty Ann Austin " ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR 5102 Gillingham Cir 5121 Gillingham Cir - Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 451 18 322 195 451 19 323 .t 195 451 20 324 Gregory Becker Frederick H Bachman Antony-Tung-Lie Chang 5111 Gillingham Cir 5101 Gillingham Cir 15 Andalucia Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Irvine CA 92614 195 451 21 325 939 010 01 326 939 010 02 327 Wilfred W Irwin BOLSA AVE BUSINESS an x)K 5081 Gillingham Cir 2 Corporate Park#160 4W--T eft Westminster CA 92683 Irvine CA 92606 Hn tington Be2rh CA 9 649 C _ 939 010 03 328 939 010 04 329 �'� 939 010 05 330 Brent Wiley Chapman I BOLSA AVE BUSINESS 4771 Pearce St 2 Corporate Park Huntington Beach CA 92649 Irvine CA 92606 .2n D Q&�L C' 939 010 06 331 939 010 07 332 939 010 08 333 BOLSA AVE BUSINESS BOLSA AVE BUSINESS BOLSA AVE BUSINESS 2 Corporate Park ,/ 2 Corporate Park ✓ 2 Corporate Park Irvine CA 92606 !� Irvine CA 92606 Irvine CA 92606 939 010 09 334 939 010 10 335 939 010 11 336 AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd ,/ 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 939 010 12 337 939 010 13 338 939 010 14 339 AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd t/ 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd // 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd v San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 939 010 15 340 939 010 16 341 939 010 17 342 AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd ll� 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd �- San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 939 010 18 343 939 010 19 344 939 010 20 345 AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR AEROSPACE & DEFENSE INDUSTR 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd �'' 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd j/ 5150 Kearny Mesa Rd �- San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 San Diego CA 92111 195 082 14 736 195 091 01 737 195 103 01 738 Edwin Solomon ;/� SCHOOL WESTMINSTER DIET Richard D Schindler 14481 Fairview Ln 14121 Cedarwood St ti'' 6002 Chinook Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 103 02 739 195 103 03 740 195 171 04 741 Phuong Phan Vicenta Tocher NORWEST MTG INC 6022 Chinook Dr 6032 Chinook Dr 14166 Rancho Rd Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19517105 742 19517106 743 19517107 744 Thomsa A Rios Jeffrey Cope Theresa A Falzon 14170 Rancho Rd 14172 Rancho Rd 314 Calle Chueca Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 San Clemente CA 92673 19517108 745 19517109 746 19517110 747 Ted A Gatt Janet Herron Kevin Williams 5081 Field St 14192 Graham St 14202 Graham St San Diego CA 92110 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 119517111 748 19517112 749 19517113 750 Kevin Williams David H (Jt) Garcia Arthur E Rosen 14202 Graham St 14216 Graham St 14222 Graham St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19517114 751 19517115 752 19517116 753 Priscilla Pastor WJII,S E F G CO Ethel L North 44480 Mayberry Ave 14215 Alta PI Hemet CA 92544 Westminster CA 92683 19517117 754 19517118 755 19517119 756 Roy E Wick Michael Anthony Falzon Barbara J Pena 14211 Alta PI 14201 Alta PI 14191 Alta PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 19517120 757 19517121 758 19517122 759 Minh Ngoc Tran John & Karen Conrad Ralph & Ralph Lewis Jr. 4213 W 161st St 14181 Alta PI 15471 Cottonwood Cir Lawndale CA 90260 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 19517216 760 19517217 761 19517218 762 Donald & Debbie Aspinall Ellis & Terri Schenck John F Suarez 14202 Alta PI 14212 Alta PI 14222 Alta PI Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 172 19 763 195 172 20 764 195 172 21 765 Von &Joan Martt Michael A Moore Kenneth D Fairless 14226 Alta PI 14232 Alta PI 6762 Lafayette Dr Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92647 l� AZt 8a6` — �neea ' 195 231 04 1006 V. 195 231 20 1007 195 231 21 1008 Robert Shu Sun Lau Michael W Pawsey Shabir R Bata 14472 Sahara Ln 14471 Sahara Ln 1343 Strattford St v Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Brea CA 92821 195 381 01 1009 195 381 02 1010 195 381 03 1011 Olga Christine Brown Richard E Sturges Robert H Armstrong 14151 Sawston Cir 14155 Sawston Cir 3908 Myrtle Ave Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Long Beach CA 90807 195 381 04 1012 195 381 05 1013 195 381 06 1014 Charles E &Marina Simmons Wu-Chuen-Fang Yang Honien & Lu H Kuo 5431 Shrewsbury Ave 16111 Jenner St 5581 Lutford Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 381 07 1015 195 381 08 1016 195 381 09 1017 Oovorchin-Petrichella Peter Richter Preston L Hill 14142 Ipswich St 14132 Ipswich St 14126 Ipswich St Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 01 1018 195 382 02 1019 195 382 03 1020 Richard A Carpenter Steven Chakiris James J Houy 14142 Sawston Cir 14146 Sawston Cir 14152 Sawston Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 04 1021 195 382 05 1022 195 382 06 1023 Tennyson Wang James H Seltzer Ronald Malcolm MacKay 5724 Spinnaker Bay Dr 14162 Sawston Cir 14172 Sawston Cir Long Beach CA 90803 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 07 1024 195 382 08 1025 195 382 09 1026 James A Kirk Alfred &Anita Ogas Anna J Madsen PO Box 4074 14241 Enfield Cir 14231 Enfield Cir Seal Beach CA 90740 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 10 1027 195 382 11 1028 195 382 12 1029 James W Butler James L Oskin Bruce R Morgan 14221 Enfield Cir 14211 Enfield Cir 14201 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 13 1030 195 382 14 1031 195 382 15 1032 Delmar Ray Christiansen Michael R Baddley Ted Hulsey 14191 Enfield Cir 14181 Enfield Cir 14161 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 195 382 16 1033 195 383 01 1034 195 383 02 1035 Karl H Winterscheid Marjorie Lou Fletcher Albert J Ingallinera 14151 Enfield Cir 14142 Enfield Cir 14152 Enfield Cir Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 Westminster CA 92683 C35) meaP - sP Lim CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ITID INTERDEPARTMENTAL COADWNICATION HUNTIHGTON BEACH TO: Herb Fauland Senior Planner FROM: Connie Brockway( City Clerk DATE: September 17, 1997 . A SUBJECT:_ VERIFICATION OF LABELS FOR PUBLIC HEARING 10IM7 � MCDONNELL DOUGLA$ s I faked the public hearing notice Tuesday upon receipt. The Independent will manage on Tuesday to publish but always request that I try to fax by Monday. Could you transmit their request to your staff who provide the legal notice? I.A Please check these labels to ensure they are all from the 1997 tax rolls and maps... The certification from Susan Case has a date of 8/14/97 and also refers knack to 6/24/97. Please verify that all l c to state law that requires the labels to be from .,p equalized rolls and if updated to be evert more recent; that the updates be based on the 1997 rolls. 4 Please verify by Friday as our volunteer, Maria, will be in to do the hearing notices. crl Thank you. let-'t"'1 cgt�•c.4l.•r 3rockway, City Clerk HuntingtQn Beach of<tho City Clerk BOX 190 3n Beach, CA 92648 4 195 414 64 1182 v Charles Richard Eis 11256 Pinio Ct Jacksonville FL 32225 �pSINGTpy �M ro"�If, B� EIS-aSb 322LJ5431S 1N 2i 10/o6/97 _ _ -- RETURN TO SENDER Z` NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE T @ UNABLE 1'0 FORWARD l Is",0 `� �\ RETURN TO SENDER 'AUNTY fat LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING .on Beach, CA 92648 -� ►ate, NEAapgt GMEC1�p _ : :' �..... H _7 Z i ti- iti i• '_ �6l4 4tfi "num f i".Mate 1�3 20 1343 ftay144 ; vi C osenblum INGTp,�,� - - R05E653 22i242066 1896 24 10/09/97 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND ROSENBLUM 5689 HACKNEY CT p�NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING RETURN TO SENDER ;rockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach of the City Clerk 'O. Box 190 L-SS �_ ` A'` )n Beach, CA 92648 C t w" ja5 072 12 662 Qavi�:!John Griffis 5958 Westminster E1114_q'= 43 I N6 Westminster CA 92683 � Tpy Z AUNTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING t it I , way, City Clerk -� i ngton Beach i AA i e City Clerk e J lox 190 each,CA 92648 V ,V J LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING _. Sri Sri: .,•f 4'10%f� �7, a City Cleric Y I/ = ' V ax 190 _ -L' ach.CA 92648 �eT U Reyr •iy'• tee._.. - ' •+l ¢ .. 1 _` a S 5 e.i 7� np{' 0 I - At+ F 145 361 04 387 Icsc";ieic,;t„e rass_� BCO CONSTRUCTION CORP [7os_si�strea. ar. 5sr 5'0 ire Blvd #512 i tic s::Ch ezcic,c i CF:2 Los Angeles 90036 Do not retail in Ois eevelope f r _ ------ 0, LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING ra.-,rm-A eL (, Sri ��ltiiiFil�t��i!l�1I�{tt1i��2l1lef'1�1�}Il�F1l�i�Fil�!!fil�lll ington Beach e City Clerk t - Sox 190 � �,i�/ �!` - , : , Cv l (,}r tach CA 92648 1 y vy �t`9 J fr v [PEFJ R C T R !"'�— � LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEYNG` i ,ckway, City Clerk ri � intington,Beach a ' — - f the City Clerk }u�n To Sender 3 Box 190 rdindd Address Beach, CA 92648Iri a � b �: i k 195 423 47 288 Milton S Thompson (IN6Tpy INTr ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ,f the City Clerk ). QCi-3'97 Box 190 �; >�'�:`� � ��, � ••� Beach,CA 92648 _ _ _ .tINST0,r co•M4,,� BF a rjS- 6-2;L- 73 %NTY � LEGk N01 NG ---- -- , -,i��.1" � �• ••4 t��f. {�i�!!£!I1�}�-�!£?14?11':!1?II££f'.£!1�1:'1£! �aa + ; £f£££ 3 - - - of the miry c;ierK O. Box 190 n Beach, CA 92648 -- RE it 145 531 36 19 GORBRAND PROPERTIES 5882 Bolsa Ave kNIN6Tpy ��' Huntington Beach CA 92649 uNTY ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ij ( jji j{ yy ff 1 t 1 t 26 S'Gs4s 3J}!?!}333ii13}i�t£1 }j}}ii}}} lilttllt{tttttlitttlitislltltlilttltttltlltlttl 3rockway, City Clerk Huntington Beach of the City Clerk '.O'. Box 190 m Beach, CA 92648 ~ tu5-syj-.24 145 531 25 16 f as/a 3/a�/zy N AEW 8,LBA ACQUISITION CO 31N6 �GF.� -'SF° o 5762 Bolsa Ave Tpy�F iCj�v� ?F� y Huntington Beach CA 92649 oAro���f 9� 9pO� l -- Z err cp LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING �2 t fli il3ttf llftlfEE!l Ffiii lt? Itlull,li fit 111iil111iitltiltlifltttt1111ftlil ter DTCTCI(VIJgy.GRy L.F@TK___ ____--- of Huntington Beach ice of the City Clerk - P=) 1 r tie P.O. Box 190 gton Beach, CA 92648 M ry 29 \{ �� 531 GORBRAND PROPERTIES 18 �.y 5912 Bolsa Ave spy c Huntington Beach CA 92649 INGTpy J' 9 VNTY LEGAL NOTICE- PUBLIC HEARING Office of the City Clerk !l y- i.�, . P.O. Box 190 '�� itington Beach, CA 92648 145 531 28 17 - GORBRAND PROPERTIES 5932 Bolsa Ave Huntington Beach CA 92649 ING ti ppplYtY �a�` LEGAL NOTICE- P McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK City of Huntington Beach SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 Prepared by EDAW, Inca with Michael C. Adams Associates Urban Design Camp Langdon Wilson Architecture Peter D. Brandow & Associates, Landscape Architects Adams, Streeter Civil Engineers, Inc. WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Adopted October , 1997 Ordinance No. 337.-), CONTENTS Page Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4. MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 1.0 Purpose, and Intent 2 4.0 Development Concept 21 1.1 Authority and Procedure 2 4.1 Land Use Plan 25 1.2 Scope and Format 3 4.2 Circulation Plan 29 4.3 Public Facilities Plans 35 2. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 4.4 Landscape Concept 43 4.5 Phasing Plan 47 2.0 Location 6 2.1 General Plan Designation 7 5. DESIGN GUIDELINES 2.2 Zoning Regulations 7 2.3 Current Land Uses 9 5.0 Project Area Character 51 2.4 Planning History 9 5.1 Site Planning Guidelines 51 2.5 State Mandated Requirements 10 5.2 Architectural Guidelines 57 5.3 Landscape Guidelines 63 3. IMPLEMENTATION 5.4 Signage Guidelines 75 3.0 Administration 13 6. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 3.1 Development Phasing Plan 13 3.2 Methods and Procedures 14 6.0 Purpose 85 3.3 Master Plan 14 6.1 General Provisions 85 3.4 Parcel Maps 14 6.2 Definitions 86 3.5 Site Plan Review 14 6.3 Development Standards 91 3.6 Reuse/Change of Use Review 17 3.7 Environmental Determination 17 APPENDICES (Volume Two) 3.8 Request for Deviation 17 3.9_ Specific Plan Amendments 18 A - Legal Description 3.10 Severability 18 B - General Plan Consistency C - Environmental Mitigation Measures McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan i LIST OF EXHIBITS Paae Paae Exhibit 1 Vicinity Maps 6 Exhibit 28 Building Corner Treatment 59 Exhibit 2 Aerial Photograph 8 Exhibit 29 Building Materials Variety 60 Exhibit 3 Existing,Conditions Map 12 Exhibit 30 Commercial Facade 61 Exhibit 4 Site Plan Review Process (Chart) 16 Exhibit 31 Office Facade 61 Exhibit 5 Illustrative Conceptual Master Plan 20 Exhibit 32 Preservation of Existing Trees 62 Exhibit 6 Land Use Plan 23 Exhibit 33 Typical Parkway Landscaping 64 Exhibit 7 Statistical Analysis (Chart) 24 Exhibit 34 Typical Parking Lot Landscaping 66 Exhibit 8 Land Use Summary (Charts) 26 Exhibit 35 Preservation of Existing Landscaping 68 Exhibit 9 Circulation Plan 28 Exhibit 36 Typical Landscape Buffer 70 Exhibit 10 Street Cross Sections 30 Exhibit 37 Typical Landscape/Parking Lot Buffer 71 Exhibit 11 Private Drive Entry 32 Exhibit 38 Plant Materials Palette 72 Exhibit 12 Water System Plan 34 Exhibit 39 Typical Signage Layout 74 Exhibit 13 Sewer System Plan 36 Exhibit 40 Wall Sign Chart 75 Exhibit 14 Storm Drainage Plan 38 Exhibit 41 Wall Sign Detail 76 Exhibit 15 Landscape Concept Plan 42 Exhibit 42 Entry Wall Sign 77 Exhibit 16 Landscaping on Perimeter Streets 44 Exhibit 43 Freestanding Sign Chart 77 Exhibit 17 Pedestrian Walkway 45 Exhibit 44 Freestanding Sign Detail 78 Exhibit 18 Phasing Plan Map 46 Exhibit 45 Entry Sign Detail 79 Exhibit 19 Infrastructure Improvements (Chart) 48 Exhibit 46 Business Directory Sign 80 Schedule of Improvements (Chart) 48 Exhibit 47 Information/Directional Sign 80 Exhibit 20 Typical Site Layout 50 Exhibit 48 Temporary Sign Detail 81 Exhibit 21 Screening of Loading & Storage Areas 52 Exhibit 49 Centre Identification Signs 82 Exhibit 22 Shared Reciprocal Access 54 Exhibit 50 Planning Areas & Subareas Map 84 Exhibit 23 Typical Entry Drive 55 Exhibit 51 Permitted Uses (Chart) 90 Exhibit 24 Architectural Details 56 Exhibit 52 Development Regulations Chart 92 Exhibit 25 Building Articulation 57 Exhibit 53 Parking Requirements 93 Exhibit 26 Typical Building Entry 58 Exhibit 54 Development Regulations Check List 95 Exhibit 27 Typical Building Wall 59 Exhibit 55 Design Guidelines Check List 96 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan u �N;��:.Nna..�n;-y t',7;Mx:'; "�,',3;, ,k''. `'�.-`:.��Y�, _ �. .�,..y _,.a<.<"�.>:',';'s, �;,:` vl"'..,.�^;•�,; ;J 5.5. "�% € ;x::�1 y" " ,' -%��, .SL fir:' "'�,5�e`",'":•o•.,Yt i, ,�5 '? ,.. �.E�, z' 1?:2� a", Skr, .�aa< �r=z, is .��' •&:"',�,z.�'.. .",�:}. ' y}3 „F� .3;r ,�" x=°R :"Ese•` -n`S'•`t'• .w,"`'�' "*�� Y. `tr"'x" 3 J a`r i c a c, g k" �. y, .•y �'i Tx r n ,a5 'V%rot, ro{', y«•i F-�,sa"aL"S zRSM� feR 1•lvi 'x"_ <�<a .,.R...<_ x.� r.F,,,..;t", >"�`•"a y"�';>:j%a y 01, t ' 4 C f }�jeV 4 � wa e�S} �s N 1 r. xy<; \`fir.. ••z�-""-^`>, e7 ,s r iy+ ya ,? ; r'.,. .�, ,,X<�,';-,;.a=;x as�'t N ;ii„j';, w�;;;.r::r,"",='•': + l� sPL� 6,. k' ,Y ''S2'z. t�� .4•'tYT i, �,: wX< .r..'3�its'::.::���`..ai�'a;��;'.c." ' '„ 'js,S,,r«;a ,,.... • .';,ya„ -"•,*F,�«„m b .« c r,a N„ x,--" ,tom xiL v^l "�f.�;. � _^�." x},r�=scaar . „as a i .1 •�f'r ..nk R" w€ a'z q aE >G z.;`. g.. 8a; t� x&- �'"zr,.'.a'a tn, .,u x v, ')' 3•}, ",:'�' �.n:/fe,/' ::;%';;' « n'""n'Yrie�•iit,v,na..°t:", �ys ;'..`eu.°k^•>' :,.s 3.ir;:<a F. ^"'"�.a. 'B Wig, �+, "gip: °�` r.�," N,�$ � >r.-..• 7 ., ->«- «n m+'s£..TRH&++':d,.•o.""��' «.. •i°`,,irk. 't•�^e*.��' �' y.'+°; > 'a��:,-;',;5'}',+..<a:;c¢,- ,„ »�e..x� � -,. .'- >., ,a� a sz5': s.v,15,E,NE`,,fs,.; �.�.."�✓.'�- ;,ay ,�i/n� rxd�' Y"x �.1."'.,a.. '.iM s .. •--`a:i:. ;:i'�«„' :.J^r �`���a ;-'ate R��a'4t' r }iix £�C;;cM`tix��''a'"�x:a"t',"�• �",,�`'1,ere':E:�',i.�'anti4'''d,,,nez.����;f,F>:5.5s;'iN `-�T"<�'`sstrrEt' -•--x..�::� �`<r,3 »,� a,">�,`•';.��qr�.Y�w�� '" `�•ti.� xi,�' s� �;.,"'",'>'",fir,,," nz ��gS%r:,��_'..r';=v ••' ts,';,, i^ttY''ni, 'fix Section One McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 1 "- INTRODUCTION 1.0 PURPOSE AND INTENT 1.1 AUTHORITY AND PROCEDURE The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan The State of California requires that all cities and coun- establishes the planning concept, design theme, devel- ties prepare and adopt a comprehensive General Plan opment regulations and administrative procedures nec- for the physical development of their area of jurisdiction. essary to achieve an orderly and compatible develop- Following the adoption of the General Plan, the entity is ment of the project area; and to implement the goals, required to develop and adopt regulating programs (zon- policies, and objectives of the Huntington Beach General ing and subdivision ordinances, building and housing Plan. The intent is to establish a public private partner- codes, and other regulations), which will implement the ship to enable the creation of a "Campus-Park" industri- policies described in the General Plan. al setting and achieve a high level quality in individual building design. California State law authorizes cities with complete General Plans to prepare and adopt Specific Plans The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan iden- (Government Code Sections 65450 et. seq.). Specific tifies the location, character and intensities of the Plans are intended to be a bridge between the local planned business park development activities. The General Plan and individual development proposals. Specific Plan establishes the alignment and design of a Specific Plans contain both planning policies and regula- circulation system, and all public facilities and infrastruc- tions, and may combine zoning regulations, capital ture necessary to facilitate a master planned develop- improvement programs, detailed development standards ment. The Specific Plan creates a compatible design and other regulatory methods into one document which theme for the project area and establishes the develop- can be tailored to meet the needs of a specific area. ment regulations necessary to accomplish the identified objectives. Local planning agencies or their legislative bodies may designate areas within their jurisdiction as ones for which The Specific Plan is regulatory in nature and serves as a Specific Plan is "necessary or convenient" zoning for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area. (Government Code Section 65451). Subsequent development plans, Parcel Maps and other entitlement requests for the project area must be consis- tent with both the Specific Plan and the Huntington Beach General Plan. An Environmental Impact Report ,(E.I.R. 96-1), with identified mitigation measures, has been prepared as a companion report to the Specific Plan. 2 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan A Specific Plan may either be adopted by ordinance or The preparation, adoption and implementation of the resolution (Government Code Section 65507). Adoption McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan by the by ordinance is common when the Specific Plan amends City of Huntington Beach is authorized by the California a development code, zoning ordinance, or other code, Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3; Article. when specific regulatory measures are included and 8, Sections 65450 through 65457. when local charters require adoption by ordinance. Resolutions are commonly used when the plan is more The Huntington Beach General Plan has recently been of a policy document. Should the legislative body wish rewritten and adopted by the City Council (May 13, to change a proposed Specific Plan recommended by 1996). The amended General Plan maintains the indus- the Planning Commission, the change must first be trial designation for the project area. The McDonnell referred back to the Commission for consideration, if not Centre Business Park Specific Plan is consistent with the previously considered (Government Code Section goals- and policies of the Huntington Beach General 65504). Plan. Adoption or amendment of a Specific Plan constitutes a 1.2 SCOPE AND FORMAT project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State's Environmental Impact Report The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan is (EIR) guidelines. If the initial environmental review divided into six sequential sections. Section One is the shows that the proposed or amended plan could signifi- Introduction and describes the purpose and intent of the cantly affect the environment, the jurisdiction must pre- document along with a brief explanation of Specific Plan pare an EIR and submit it in draft form for public review. procedures and authorization. The need for an EIR in a particular case is determined by the local government. A Specific Plan and an EIR on a Section Two is the Project Area Description and is Specific Plan overlap extensively; they must address intended to establish the reasons why the Specific Plan many of the same concerns and the process for prepar- process is logical and necessary for this portion of the ing them is nearly identical. Therefore, environmental City. This section presents a general description of the assessment should be an integral part of preparing or Specific Plan area including designated land uses, exist- revising a Specific Plan. ing zoning and existing uses. In addition, special char- acteristics and existing conditions which make this area unique have been identified. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 3 Section Three is Implementation and discusses the process by which individual projects will be reviewed and approved. This.section outlines the Parcel Map and Site �.� Plan Review procedures. This section also describes the process for project appeals and the methods by � which the Specific Plan can be modified or amended. ; Section Four describes the Master Plan Concept. The . design concept evolves from the objectives outlined in Section One and the existing conditions discussed in Section Two along with input from numerous public meetings and special studies conducted by and for the City. This section presents the development options proposed for various sites and the circulation, public facilities, infrastructure and landscaping which will sup- port the development concept and reinforce the design theme. In addition, a development phasing plan has been prepared as part of this section. ' =�;zi.'• t ":, y,�yS'�t s''�",'^aa "' tis Nvn�u :. '��'C',"�„ 'a, " }a , i i}Tsy 9 � 7 '.•.,;;l.a 1."'ti`j r .a a 'k. aar''$.w°" ffA���y,%a'Te`a:> +S�Mn ." „, Section Five establishes Design Guidelines for the entire project area and for individual project development. This section identifies and describes the intended character for the area and provides a framework for project imple- An Appendix (printed under separate cover) has been com- mentation. piled which contains all the special studies and reports which have contributed to the formation of the Specific Plan. Section Six presents a detailed description of the The Appendix (Volume Two) includes the Legal Description Development Regulations which are necessary to guide of the site, a General Plan Consistency Analysis and identi- and control new projects and carry out the goals and fies the Mitigation Measures desired in the Environmental policies of the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. Impact Report. 4 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan ,>r= � w�.y1. S �6 �y 4i^ '4...'fh- 'Ng,v., 1.';:":'•: .3'..?.' fn b' t a :v'"•° W.a.,.a•r.,t,:" ,z .ye _,,....: .. ,'.:�' ,.,., v'r'�v .•F's'S"",.., x {•..,':,W��• .A &. .GIz- y.y r;,,�•s" n•,t we �,1,xix , rig '''i?" 5� �<`.".". a� v .Y� 4. Cz, t ,.r, e`•<.wr54,.;yt � rfe',,i.,.+��.''�''-.".`�':Sx�,.:Y.. -r,�S.>. �+>R.1 A.?r -•.fie t,,� A A 'id a.: M< d}i > �r,f n e.yrb ta' r f < �F.,F >a• �,1, t r ";�. .mud �• x:.x.-�''''.'�as 40 r� T»I�o� E �,S n 5 , a•8 Sr �ro x.. , .wn .' ,r., > F.,e, .,,.� � •_,.., .r . . rJt,'i•z' ,:c., `��,,. TT�'��,;eF%5`r`;t;,;ri'a`�k fr 3 %w.v fh"�*�x ;3i": »+j K."��`'v�`��., r.{�"'`x'�.:'t�aY ,�..f`tl�'�• a 4 �".^,xa:r�?ii�iw��"`>�;-s�. Y� •f n• R `�� a !F '-•"�'=,.�4inr' >�, ' �J`->s.�,x•.� ., ..>",,,ins.,",;;-;-.ufk ,x,.. _. ,Id`2 �.....-��`�-�.,<,I,f ,;%.;,i ^�� � '- F t 'love •,• -�'":+��`'►..-'�k�'�f+'„$� � n., as•.i,Fcrrsn'"s��' '`--"-='-^;.^:- n,�'^�i'k��'���,�I �^� � S t� , :u���� -�' �� is s:�,'".:.e,a.' `:" ,�t�s�� ,�;•' y.,r,�'.rn� ��, ¢ i i 15�,�'Ml�ylil�'�, v i Section Two McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 2.0 LOCATION The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan covers 307 ggross acres located in the northwestern portion of the City of p y •PASADENA Huntington Beach. The area is generally bounded on the north ' tv by Rancho Road and the U.S. Navy railroad right-of-way • • LOS ANGES (excluding the City's water reservoir site); on the east by MONICASANTA Springdale Street, on the south by Bolsa Avenue and on the west by Bolsa Chica Street. A legal description of properties in ANG LES+ 57 the Specific Plan project area has been included in the '"TE AIRPORT RPORT L Appendix. • LONG TORRANCE BEACH ANAHEIM GARDEN • San Gabriel(605) Fwy. AIRPORT GROVE •LONG • a Garden Grov (22)FWy, B�►c SA arden Grove Blvd. �'� LONoaEAcw� ANA / LOHANGELESSITE. HARBOR W IRVIN { d0 in North HUNTINGTON BEACH • JOHN WAYNE NEWPORTBEACH RANG ECOU 90 Regional Location AIRPORT Westminster Avenue �a W C The project area is surrounded by a variety of land uses stronautics o m and activities. A railroad spurtrack of the U.S. Navy and Q-a Dr. Westminister Rancho Road create the northern boundary with low � v) Mail ca density residential uses located across from the railroad 8 Skylab m tracks (in the City of Huntington Beach) and across c Bolsa Ave. NAve. Rancho Road (in the City of Westminster). To the south, mCO office and manufacturing uses are located across from McFadde Bolsa Avenue. To the east, low density residential and s Ia Golden commercial uses are located across from Springdale weSr North College Street. To the west, is the Orange County Flood Control � � Site Location Huntington Channel (CO-3). The property across from Bolsa Chica Beach Street and the flood control channel is owned by the U.S. Mail Navy and is used as part of the Seal Beach Naval Vicinity Maps Weapons Station (in the City of Seal Beach). Exhibit 1 6 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 2.1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 2.2 ZONING REGULATIONS The entire site of the McDonnell Centre Business Park is The McDonnell Centre Business Park is presently zoned currently designated as industrial with a floor area ratio limited industrial ("IL") and limited industrial with a high (F.A.R.) of 0.75 in City's General Plan. The site has been rise overlay ("IL-H"), in designated areas. The adoption designated for industrial land uses since the mid 1960's. of this Specific Plan will supersede the existing.zoning' Continuation of industrial uses in this portion of the City and establish a new set of development regulations. The is compatible with the General Plan Goal (LU 12) to Specific Plan, as presented with industrial, office and "Achieve the development of industrial uses that provide support commercial uses, is consistent with the current job opportunities for existing and future residents, as well General Plan; and therefore will not require a General as the surrounding subregion, and generate revenue for Plan Amendment. the City." J 1 <. �2-•a�x>a.<�. .n�.-.are x�^ ..W,•..nLl2'.Fk ,.. flAk'bdti„ ' rr McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 7 l� �. ' vN � ;V' d � 1Q- • �.�" .v y `�i 51eY'`�. ,. F s�"7' s '?�sa��` ,.ads yrA' ay`". `' ��b�++£� ��� µ r e✓ �^a s4 �A ��I '± 3 kr 1€ My ��;( '°%���*,".:. �.��j�",°+; a �",�.``Y �"Y��,►. -�` � i �e�a.w :r'� ��� � uw�.. �AIL'ROADRACKS. , i��;y, `� k.•. �`� a� a�3,? t �"� ��� x�e � `� � s a+•'�"� a cuC' ,.x t '•i :�. +'r�i�a ¢•q P q t g � �+ �' .w , 's,�„-^r.N ., a�'s an" ` (• 4: r 's'� .�'a.f•Q x A'a' �b t t r � ' 'A' F r ;�„•r L yai;, �� i� ,t ! �. �' �� ..�Y a r ,� ��� �3� :y€1' � <'� �t fir,3ttsnir� `� r� Ace•r r� :� 7. f. �,� y "i a$n SY aar as a tk� a: .• El er" `' -. f W ,. a�M:,,s, r..+ ..,.� � �iya� w t }—SKY LAB!R D�IIfES _ 0 .4 .. a �u F— ��.m.�.���tM r �„ � � .< iwf 4: b V eY, ��� �T}� �a",r ". .x'S�,$„ ; �s# a8 t. x; i n ��: y{���� l � \y�;:..Ytw•� '��t����+ �i� � �� �'�' .>.. �N/ �• r' ?. ,rIR' 'u,..,�• +` 4 .. ' 1°`,`.x,F` l '''NL yfi !" i�, '� V 1 ij � #" 'r�r`�fr ,7�'•0 < >t; I■•a < ,r.� w. :, .'a � 3.."a e'� r .'+'" , Q e � '�.*-t " • fr .y. F .:. r i. ;; { r ' ,^az vr� ,z, ,.i Y °:� lq- 0 WIN ^'ID s.e,r`�: r'r" ,cbw.aw. aamw«,may y ... Ni� Ja +� •`a`��,sf'' ••---...,-<......,.r >�^',";»k :r,^ r .. 'S`g^_ •c7sx*wr,^� t a, Y .,z_ z tr `� �f a� -a N"��` �;`,�". 'y. v �,•+ '�1 S:`�"`��,�'��M��{ �j`4 � .Z>� �s�. p �'��' e r �� .,.:�?'-mac"", �'u`'L S w£a�' as ac(s\ s;33 C.." y: �Ila 5,.� v^Ms � f;?�•y .,', c?^. yy# ;'� mi �� � r� rq � � n • s�k' C r,,� � �yY •Y 2,r� ;1 � �. �� � .ar*�' �� ��`��.s� q�� � �r�, �`� `;v �3'z ,�:;. �'?„q:, x, r•A f�•. ' N"`+ aa�z�R` '{ +..' ;�.:� �� R �'� �� � t _`T �, �,�.R,��, ,y ��`y ��� _." xY:+k"� ;' A <f �,,...e.r�e s,E3 5`'z" § t U fv^•' ��+ .. �' ?: zka 3 k.:U _ 5�� ,a i `-e �',rs •-u5 `..: a3fl.... ..' t� s Z-tr�• r3...: 'P "O y , {! §j i� ,� ISL. LJim" MY "# :F",:t'a.--.,...>' rr. ti .. '..:.;a'i .«Y 2�M °"` =S �area`B LSQ"'KV �V•�p'� � v�'> k�z'�'=' 4�9 a �� � w a�* .«� �`"�� y.�.� s., q� -r�•� r � a°t.��. "�p,,,.,v; �,�` :,�, �' ..fg&a,-r .� :}'�, ��,wv� r¢�?� •a4"' "M'.a�. `�i._uw+�tw,aHeu.�z��i r +n.,., 3`�,c.K.,,�, �aY' ,�4 t -r ati;4: .b tzi� 2.3 CURRENT LAND USES The McDonnell Centre Business Park site currently con- a number of projects have been reviewed and approved sists of a number of activities. The primary use is the subject to the draft specifications of the Specific Plan. approximately 2,800,000 square foot McDonnell ;.., .; y 3Dou Douglas Aerospace Facility. The facility consists of `". '"Friar ,�T rY1 . numerous industr ially related research and development L- s ., res along with a high-rise office buildin This structures 9• . .....-.. . .. y```e>;.F i ; s,,-. n approved and developed in numerous .,: facilityhas bee �� phases over many years beginning in 1963. New private developments are beginning to appear on the eastern portion of the project area, replacing the _ - � w. , a truck farming operations of the past. Cambro < Manufacturing has constructed and occupies a 120,000 square foot facility, with ultimate development of 280,412 square feet. Sharp Electronics is currently constructing a 2.4 PLANNING HISTORY 538,859 square foot facility. The remainder of the Specific Plan area is vacant. with the exception of a net- The McDonnell Centre Business Park project area has work of roadways and remote parking facilities, Portions been the subject of many special studies with a variety of of the project area are currently entitled and many development options explored. In 1981 a proposal was parcels are being actively marketed for new industrial prepared for the development of 1,200,000 square feet and commercial development. The activities described of industrial and office space. The proposal was for a in the Specific Plan reflect the beginning of the planning Restricted Manufacturing Zone Change which allowed process (June 1996). Since the initiation of this exercise for an "appropriate" mix of uses; concurrent with the Zone Change request, a Multi-Story designation was low ; < also requested. The Industrial/Office complex plans con- g " sisted of industrial and warehouse buildings, office build- '' ins a hotel and restaurant with a parking structure, inte- ":a";_ rior circulation system and landscaped open space. The office and hotel structures were proposed for six and seven stories along the eastern portion of the project a .. area adjacent to Springdale Street. Due to market con- ! `' ditions, the project was not pursued. �fr McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 9 V�' 2.5 STATE MANDATED REQUIREMENTS '2.5.2 Congestion Management Plan To comply with the State of California legislated man- The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) is required by dates, the City of Huntington Beach has adopted sever- Assembly Bill 471 (Proposition 111), subsequently modi- al plans to deal with regional issues including Air Quality, fied by Assembly Bill 1791. This Bill requires every Congestion Management, Growth Management and urbanized county to adopt a CMP; the County of Orange Transportation Demand Management Plans. has prepared a CMP which includes the City of Huntington Beach. The CMP requires mitigation of traf- 2.5.0 POLICY : fic impacts of development, as well as trip reduction pro- grams. The City of Huntington Beach has completed the All projects within the Specific Plan area shall comply mandated components of the CMP including level of ser- with the applicable provisions of the following plans: vice standards, trip reduction program, and a capital 2.5.1 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan improvements program for traffic and transit. The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) 2.5.3 Growth Management Plan requires measures to reduce traffic congestion, improve A Growth Management Plan (GMP) is required to imple- air quality, and requires that cities develop Air Quality ment the passage of Orange County Measure M components within their General Plans. These mea- approved in the 1990 election. Its purpose is to ensure sures include Regulation XV, a program which requires that the planning, management, and implementation of employers of more than one hundred (100) persons to traffic.improvements and public facilities are adequate to prepare trip reduction plans, and a requirement for juris- meet current and projected needs. The City has an dictions to prepare an air quality component in the approved Growth Management Element which meets General Plan. the requirements for Measure M funding and an adopted The City of Huntington Beach is subject to all local juris- Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. diction requirements set forth by the AQMP. The City Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures has adopted an Air Quality Element which incorporates are generally directed at increasing auto occupancy, AQMP measures. decreasing peak hour usage, and managing demand for transportation facilities. The City TDM Ordinance is part of its compliance with the Growth Management Plan. 10 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan MPLEM ENATI ON T.. .^r r-rYT!`" .-+�- /�i.•.�. ,a �.ep ���g��+;ayf.`i�1� .`s "s� 6 �^'?�s t�.• �d ,F. I >',-3a `%�"4,g�„Y,' or jw = r > "AP t [2 me •,.. a- .H,' `�..ld . Section Three McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 11 '44 C •S♦ ft/ij 11 ► l a �3' f'';rF rt h• �,r.`lF..,s. Z` y ��+ �s' �n�i rah t °f a ^:"','�. _a' < �'�. x. rex+. 'at. + ' y �. e '+uy �.,:�, !'7!"fPy •t, 'a y'a<. ar - ow E �� • .s s�� •r� � trj s�S,t � r `� k r�� a ',rs � :, e' �n_'p Lh re.sf!' t }� s � is ,� s z ", h • Y�� � ��n� c- • � 3 �. r s � `€� �x t�'-+ ' vim' „ � �. ^d ?. a •.,•.�;= rx '� a p �+,` a r '' f'' S < ♦ ' SCt 17 .. ! i� '��"'° i •• 5� �j�R jar �z v �{ zs • �r t ..+., �';; S :+4 • . x* ;rah. :f $;<,�', s �a : � K^: d . t ix. �g".°nx>�t<r',�t�;«�c,�}.,.,� �, a ,M$t�„�r,�^,•a.. �. � ....„. �.,. ,.'zt* !- +x� s, a �nr na .r � � ., x.� " r ,Fi r ; f ♦p—AJI tff Aw r Ilk � y}# � ��� y .. 4 �is`� � ♦9: �, }. �},.. � ��:.A • �y_ •� ., .,�a �.�, T,,q�, s .. ,�� "r "F T .t ,;airr �'` e ------a ♦ 6 t` r• `. Y C� a. :t% a.3kI IT, J !C T b. jF. � t '� Y`a .y pg' q ;rs,,,w `Fv.•.*a, d f ��_� i �..:>i = t :<..'.s' ..« .. "s a r _ •• �,,,a �' • y x.�,'v. .i}.+<, ♦S' x .♦ �' y - t` t ..• x`�:.4 '� •';. v$.�;.. :...•..< s N a � .. ..,`_w '`� r F�L; � na''^�a . r '$t � �y.,,f. .. Ay� � a Yu lgli"is YN '�"�,- � ��'v i > r� �€;fity �� • t�� a:" }:,�...,., .,.,�,,,.sq,..� e - �•+.^. °, 1, F�.+.. t� � ..i.<w e ;� ram, y�:y;,s w. �."` s•.�».'�«.+.,i,._�=�, ,.E�.,� d .• ''v°�d'$��,,"�?�'�,`'ra� � +',Z`'�jn< .�? F. wa.� t � <tu+:a.< i,„,„,,,,•,rw,.,r •.a.:,......_.«:... - �� �+.w..�.w..,�i �: �i�t x. J�' xs� '3t,*��+ • 7� a��.p-^ 7� �'i•k�.��9fl f'. ,, �i.�,�,� a �� ��� :j- ,� 3¢�a�A"».< � „_,re.„—w, b���� k► 3Y:'._=� w.►r r <`�•.�I-` Zr''A .L. Ts •,.^� • �• ;x. S �.� IMPLEMENTATION 3.0 ADMINISTRATION • Changes to the infrastructure (i.e., storm drain, water and sewer systems), as recommended by the City's The City's Director of Community Development shall Director of Public Works. administer the provisions of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan in accordance with the State • The adjustment, addition and/or lot consolidation as of California Government Code, Subdivision Map Act, addressed in this section of the Specific Plan. the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and the City's General Plan. 0Modifications to the alignment of the Planning Area boundaries to coincide with specific development The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, plans, as recommended by the City's Community standards and specifications shall supersede the rele- Development Director. vant provisions of the City's Zoning Code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they cur- All modifications must be reviewed for compliance with rently exist or may be amended in the future. Any devel- opment regulation and building requirement not of the McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan and con- addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the sistency with the Environmental Impact Report. City's adopted regulations in place at the time of an indi- 3.1 DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN vidual request. The Director of Community Development shall have the The McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan area is discretion to determine if requests for modification to the designed for maximum flexibility and anticipates that Specific Plan are minor or major. Minor modifications or individual development projects will be constructed over amendments may be accomplished administratively by a period of years; with no specific target date for com- the Director. Major amendments will require the pro- pletion. Development starts and occupancy will be dic- cessing of a Zoning Text Amendment, subject to the tated by market forces and phased accordingly. City's processing regulations in place at the time of the A development Phasing Plan (Section 4.5) has been pre- request. Minor modifications to the Specific Plan pared identifying a program of the relative timing of include, but are not limited to: development within each of the Planning Areas. The The addition of information to the exhibits or text Phasing Plan also provides a guideline for the construc- • tion of community infrastructure and public improve- which serve to clarify, but do not change the meaning ments to adequately service new projects within the or intent. Specific Plan area. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 13 3.2 METHODS AND PROCEDURES The methods and procedures for implementation of the Community Development and City Engineer providing Specific Plan shall be on a project by project basis. The the proposal is found to be in compliance with the adoption of the Specific Plan alone will not require infra- Specific Plan. structure improvements to the project area. Physical improvements will only coincide with the recordation of a In order to approve a Parcel Map the Director of Parcel Map and/or approval of an individual development Community Development shall make the following find- project. The Specific Plan is a regulatory document and ings: is not intended to be a Development Agreement. • The Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan 3.3 MASTER PLAN Land Use Element designation of Industrial (F.A.R. 0.75), the Specific Plan, and all other applicable pro- A Master Plan Concept for the project area identifying visions of the City's adopted codes and regulations; primary and alternative land uses, circulation system, and infrastructure layout, public facilities and landscape scheme has been prepared (Section Four) in conjunction • The site is physically suitable for the type and densi- with the Specific Plan. All proposed projects shall be ty of development proposed; and consistent with the intent of the Master Plan Concept. • The design of the subdivision or the proposed 3.4 PARCEL MAPS improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially The project area will be subdivided through a series of and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; Parcel Maps. Parcel Maps shall be prepared consistent and with the Master Plan Concept to create developable sites. These maps shall identify the infrastructure and The design of the subdivision or the type of improve- improvements necessary to support the anticipated pro- ments will not conflict with easements, acquired by jects, subject to review by the City's Public Works and the public at large, for access through the use of Fire Departments. property within the proposed subdivision unless alter- native easements, for access or for use, will be pro- Upon recordation, Parcel Maps may be further divided vided. and/or adjusted by filing a subsequent Parcel Map or a Lot Line Adjustment, pursuant to the provisions of the 3.5 SITE PLAN REVIEW Subdivision Map Act. A parcel may be created with or without a specific project plan. A Parcel Map may be Individual development projects within the McDonnell approved, or conditionally approved by the Director of Centre Business Park Specific Plan project area shall be 14 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan implemented through a Site Plan Review process. A the floor plans and a list of all the building materials, and Site Plan Review shall be required for all new develop- exterior colors. An application fee for this service shall ment activity, with the exception of interior improve- be established by a separate resolution of the City ments, general maintenance and repair or other minor Council. construction activities that do not result in an intensifica- tion of the use. These exceptions may be subject to The Director of Community Development has the author- . other Building and Public Works permits and approvals ity to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Site Plan prior to commencement. Review. A Site Plan Review application may also require analysis and comments from various departments of the A Site Plan Review request shall be submitted to the City City. In order to approve a Site Plan Review application, on a standard City application'form. Prior to the submit- the Director of Community Development shall make the tal to the City; McDonnell Douglas Realty Company or following findings: their successors in interest may review all plans for acceptability of design, compliance with the CC&R's and • The request is consistent with the City's General Plan Specific Plan intent. and all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code; and Application to the City for a Site Plan Review shall include a narrative of the proposed activity along with • The requested activity will not be detrimental to the preliminary development plans and drawings. The nar- general welfare of persons working or residing in the rative shall consist of a project description identifying the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property intended services offered with square feet, hours and and improvements in the neighborhood; and days of operation, number of employees, and other information as appropriate. Supplemental to the appli- • The requested activity will not adversely affect the cation submission, project plans shall be prepared Circulation Plan (Exhibit 9); and including the following preliminary plans: site plan, floor plans, elevations, landscaping, grading, fencing and sig- • The requested activity will comply with the provisions nage plans; other plans may be required depending on of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan the complexity of the project. The entire parcel shall be and other applicable regulations or special conditions plotted with dimensions and all pertinent data and required of the project. include dimensions to the nearest intersecting public street and identify all street names. In addition, all exist- The action of the Director of Community Development ing and proposed physical features and structures on the shall be final unless appealed to the Zoning subject property and abutting properties shall be plotted. Administrator by the applicant within ten calendar days of written notification. Such Appeals for a Site Plan The application shall also include a legal description of Review shall be subject to the procedures outlined in the the property, identification of the uses for each room on City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 15 Site Plan Review Process Project Concept Project Review w/City Application Determination Concept Planning Staff Parcel Map New Building Certificate of Business Request Construction Reuse Request Permitmw� Occupancy License Request LDouglas ll ealt Request for y Site Plan Review Deviation Application Submittal (Processed Concurrently) Assign Project Create Project Review for Pay Fee Planner File Completeness Hearing and Development Determination Environmental Review the Com unity Conditional Determination Committee(All Development A royals City Depts.) pp Director Exhibit 4 96 'McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan i A Site Plan Review approval shall be valid for a period of 3.7 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION one year. Additional one year extensions may, be requested for a maximum of two years. Such an exten- The extent and intensity of all anticipated development sion request must be made in writing by the original activity for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area has applicant, property owners, and/or authorized designee, been identified in the Specific Plan and analyzed in a minimum of thirty days prior to the expiration of the cur- Environmental Impact Report 96-1. rent approval. If construction activity does not com- mence within the approval or extension period, the enti- Development project requests consistent with the Specific tlement shall be terminated. All final decisions on site fic Plan shall not be subject to additional environ- plan review proposals shall be the responsibility of the mental review unless otherwise required by C.E.Q.A. Director of Community Development. However, the Director of Community Development may request an additional environmental assessment for 3.6 REUSE/ CHANGE OF USE REVIEW unique or unusual circumstances, that have not been previously addressed in the environmental review. Any proposal to reuse and/or change the use of a previ- ously approved and constructed development, within the The Director of Community Development may impose project area, will be subject to additional review by the environmental mitigation measures, as specified in the Community Development Department. The additional E.I.R., as conditions of approval on individual Site Plan review will follow the same procedures outlined in the Reviews. Such conditions of approval shall describe the Site Plan Review process. A "like for like" change of use time period and manner in which the mitigation measure ( i.e. office to office or light manufacturing to light manu- must be satisfied. facturing) may only be subject to the requirements for a new certificate of occupancy; however any intensification 3.8 REQUEST FOR DEVIATION of use shall require a new Site Plan Review. The prima- The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan ry concern will be to review the project request with the Development Regulations (Section Six) are intended to E.I.R. "Trip Generation Budget" and analyze the on-site encourage projects which create an aesthetically pleas- ratio of available parking with the anticipated number of ing appearance, enhance the environment, and facilitate employees. In addition any proposed physical modifica- innovative quality architectural design with an adaptation tions to the existing structure and/or site shall be subject to the surrounding environment. to additional review and approval of the Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Deviations from the Development Regulations of the Specific Plan may be granted at the time of Site Plan Review for special circumstances and/or unique archi- tectural features. Requests for Deviation may include but are not limited to parcel size, building height, i McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 17 site coverage, setbacks, open space,,parking, and land- • Be consistent with objectives of the Specific Plan in scaping. Deviation requests, up to twenty (20) percent of achieving a project adapted to the area and compati- any single standard, may be considered by the Director ble with the surrounding environment; and of Community Development. Deviations greater than twenty (20) percent must be approved by a Variance • Be consistent with the goals and policies of the City's application before the Zoning Administrator, subject to General Plan, and comply with State and Federal the procedures outlined in the City's Zoning and Law. Subdivision Ordinance. Development and construction phasing of selected provisions and features may be 3.9 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS approved by the Director concurrent with a Site Plan Review and shall not require a Request for Deviation or Specific Plan Amendments, other than a Minor Variance to the Specific Plan. Modification as previously described (Section.3.0), shall be made through the Zoning Text Amendment process; Deviations shall be allowed when, in the opinion of the subject to consideration and approval of the Planning Director of Community Development, significantly Commission and City Council in accordance with the greater benefits from the project can be provided than provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and would occur if all the minimum requirements were met. Subdivision Ordinance. Such Amendments may include Some additional benefits which may make a project eli- changes to the Master Plan Concept, Design Guidelines gible for consideration include: greater'open space, policies and the introduction of alternative Development greater setbacks, unique or innovative designs, public Regulations. open space, and the use of energy conservation or inno- vative technology. The Director of Community 3.10 SEVERABILITY Development may approve the Request for Deviation in whole or in part upon making the following findings: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this title, or any future amendments or addi- • Promote better design, environmental and land plan- tions hereto, is for any reason held to be invalid or ning techniques and contribute to the economic via- unconstitutional by the decision of any court of compe- bility of the community, through aesthetically pleasing tent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validi- architecture, landscaping and site layout; and ty of the remaining portions of this title, or any future amendments or additions hereto. The City hereby • Not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, declares that it would have adopted these titles and each safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City sentence, subsection, clause, phrase, or portion or any in general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of future amendments or additions thereto, irrespective of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, the City in general; and clauses, phrases, portions or any future amendments or additions thereto may be declared invalid or unconstitu- tional. 18 'McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan MASTER PLAN CONCEPT aaauunanmaunnnmmauneamynuna�lWamy Office Park NW ti ib d s R� tils ■ Section Four McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 19 1•`s F �` wH •>Er r I q. .<4 f 3 t i %. r•4 '�6'.. �. G 3i Y. C :a k�jF. i £Rr w � ¢ �s 6-, W�u2 Mall } 5 1. M. A ✓ 5 a i J €z> e rM �.�',, r.�;, ;' ?,a r<;, sa fder,?c.:a�; �, a�. .,?�•„`s' z° t; '�..e,,'" .�"�eSti .�� •y y .°.n ��i:�i L _ ,Y T,r»<,.,;,> 1 fi cz. ? ;.�.?e !t ,�.'a a. .E " $kYla6r`,�'.:< iRd:�%ra. ..�.,. 'aex. - ,.r. "s �.°'�«'•°.t° ,xtat^ ,;rY,TS ro"i,.Yme•' a+'-a »; _ ::•:E�$. ,.49�"�Y",`,.' .kB�,d`.'ds'wwK�xii;A%i..s'e R �'�":. -;9P5:: '2 e. .:%. 'f�& .u,•- �,�'<'.if4� Lli >! �.SY,"�.t'.t i3�� s�' IS I ;< ,3p„✓/f.:A'r.' .,t,;;,,,� :i `x'E°,"`J�' SS .,��n,,a,"'Y,"•,,' w;T;te+° � a �� .�3 .s<.t,.,.ax.a.,a,� <. .:8xa,.-`4i.,e". � a n.Wtd aE �y'•y�"E, '•�0�3•• i , la° Note: This illustrative shows a hypothetical development scenario on the project site. Illustrative Conceptual Master Plan OeA� Exhibit 5 0 North 20 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 4.0 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan the area ideal for a variety of compatible business land development concept provides for a planned uses and activities. The development concept is Industrial/Business Park complex in the Northwestern designed in concert with the area's history of industrial portion of the City of Huntington Beach. The Specific activities and the community's need for a strong self-suf- Plan establishes the general type, location, parameters ficient economy. and character of all development within the sites bound- aries, while allowing for creative design ideas on individ- The McDonnell Centre Business Park provides for a ual projects consistent with an overall concept. range of employment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and industrial fields; and will widen the The McDonnell Centre Business Park will be a large employment base of the community. The Specific Plan (307 gross acre) master planned industrial facility with establishes a clear development concept to assure the office and supporting retail uses. The Specific Plan is facilitation of a cohesive complex. Design measures designed to allow for development in a manner that is encompassing site planning, area landscaping, building compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and City architecture, streetscapes, pedestrian linkages, set- of Huntington Beach. The area will be incrementally backs and signage have been established. Concern and developed in phases over an extended period of time adherence to these details will combine to create a and provide an opportunity for a variety of quality indus- unique and integrated business park development. trial, office and commercial uses, consistent with the City's General Plan. A conceptual illustrative site plan (Exhibit 5) has been prepared showing a hypothetical scenario utilizing the The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan pro- various guidelines described in the Specific Plan. The vides the framework and guidelines necessary to create plan provides a potential layout identifying building ori- a unique, high quality, industrial, research and develop- entation and placement, parking design and access, ment business park complex. The site's natural features roadway configuration, entryways and landscaping. and proximity to regional transportation systems make The plan is not intended to reflect an ultimate build-out situation; a large variety of development patterns and activities may evolve consistent with the Specific Plan policies, quidelines and regulations. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 21 The Specific Plan recognizes that development will occur The Specific Plan recognizes that the major portion of over a long period of time and, therefore, must anticipate the project area has been developed around the existing future concerns for the area. In order to address this aerospace facility operations. The Specific Plan antici- concern, flexibility has been incorporated into the pates a continuation and possible expansion of the aero- Specific Plan Development Regulations (Section Six). space facility. Any modifications and or expansion of the This flexibility in development guidelines is intended to existing aerospace facility shall continue to be regulated accommodate future market trends and tenant needs, by the provisions of the Limited Industrial ("IL") provi- without sacrificing the intended high-quality character of sions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision the project area. Ordinance. Any reuse, subdivision and subsequent new non aerospace development shall be subject to the pro- The objective of the Specific Plan is to implement the visions of the Specific Plan. goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan by defining the physical development of the McDonnell The Specific Plan identifies and requires sufficient infra- Centre Business Park site. Included in this approach are structure and public facilities to adequately and efficient- the establishment of land use, circulation, infrastructure, ly support any and all anticipated land uses and activi- landscape and architectural design characteristics for ties. These improvements will be phased to coincide the project area. The Specific Plan consists of six major with or precede individual development projects. This components which will guide the development process: upfront effort will allow future development projects to ,the Land Use Plan, Circulation Plan, Public Facilities obtain City approval in an expedited manner, providing Plan, Landscape Concept, Design Guidelines, and the individual projects are consistent with the Specific detailed Development Regulations. Plan and the Environmental Impact Report. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan identifies The Land Use Plan addresses the need for flexibility by effective land planning and design regulations tech- allowing for a variety of activities within each Planning niques in a format which can take advantage of the best Area. This approach will enable the existing McDonnell ideas of tomorrow. Douglas Aerospace Facility to expand into the undevel- oped portions of adjacent Planning Areas or allow for compatible new private development. 22 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan PLANNING AREA 4 Industrial/Aerospace Industrial/Aerospace 22 Acres 4 Acres F, Office/R&D 4 Acres Industrial/Aerospace Office/R&D 5 Acres 4 Acres Industrial Industrial 12 Acres 12 Acres Office/R&D Office/R&D 10 Acres 8 Acres iy �777 A'� F CommercialCommercial 3 Acres 3.5 Acres Office/R&D 11 Acres Industrial 4.5 Acres Commercia", 12 Acres Industrial ........... 16 Acres �, Office/R&D Office/R&D Office/R&D 20 Acres 4 Acres 8 Acres Land Use Plan North Exhibit 6 Note: This illustrative shows a hypothetical development scenario on the project site. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 23 Statistical Analysis Plan Industrial Uses Office Uses Commercial Uses TOTALS Area Aerospace Manufacturing Warehousing Light Research Office Retail Restaurant Hotel Industrial Development Park Existing 1 2,789,053 2,789,053 Development 1A 0 2 120,000 120,000 3 0 4 0 5 1 235,831 235,831 Subtotal 2,789,053 0 120,000 0 0 235,831 0 0 0 13,144,884 Entitled 1 0 Projects 1A 0 2 110,400 490,732 98,139 699,271 3 0 4 0 5 345,551 9,600 14,000 369,151 Subtotal 0 110,400 490,732 0 0 443,690 9,600 14,000 0 1,068,422 Future 1 253,312 76,472 148,164 477,948 Development 1A 261,360 261,360 522,720 2 149,154 298,309 149,154 4,000 96,000 696,617 3 235,224 470,448 235,224 940,8- 6 4 228,690 457,380 228,690 914,760 5 98,450 107,399 1 134,169 150,0001 1120,0001610,018 Subtotal 0 253,312 689,540 11,324,5871 368,759 1,156,761 150,000 4,000 216,000 4,162,959 Total 1 2,789,053 253,312 76,472 148,164 3,267,001 Anticipated 1A 261,360 261,360 522,720 Development 2 110,400 759,886 298,309 247,293 4,000 96,000 1,515,888 3 235,224 470,448 235,224 940,896 4 228,690 457,380 228,690 914,760 5 98,450 107.399 715,551 1159,6001 14,000 120,000 1,215,000 Subtotal1 2,789,0531 363,712 1 1,300,272 1,324,587 368,759 1,836,2821159,6001 18,000 216,000 8,376,265 Note: Activity square footage may vary and may transfer between Planning Areas provided the use intensity is consisitent with the E.I.R. "Trip Generation Budget' and allowed within the Planning Areas. Exhibit 7 24 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.1 LAND USE PLAN The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan AREA 1A divides the project site into six Planning Areas (1,1A,2,3,4,&5). The purpose of identifying separate Planning Area 1A is the entrance to the Aerospace Planning Areas is to create a distinct cluster of activities Facility and provides the primary parking facilities along and allow for individual project development to occur in a Bolsa Avenue. The area consist of 20 net acres and is timely manner, within an overall Master Plan Concept. anticipated to be developed as additional McDonnell This approach recognizes development phasing pat- Douglas research and development operations. Area 1A terns, market conditions and establishes sufficient flexi- may also provide new opportunities for private office bility to provide for the opportunity of a variety of activi- development, research and development facilities and/or ties within each Planning Area. commercial retail activities. This area can accommodate a total development of 522,720 square feet. AREA 1 AREA 2 Planning Area 1 is the core of the project area and includes the existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Planning Area 2 includes the area along Springdale Facility. The current facility is composed of 2,789,053 Street and Bolsa Avenue, westerly to Able Lane; and square feet of building area on 100 net acres of land. It comprises 58 net acres of land. This Planning Area will is anticipated that the aerospace facility will continue to provide opportunities for new industrial related develop- modernize and expand in the coming years. Anticipated ment projects. Sharp Electronics is currently construct- short-term improvements include outside storage facili- ing a 538,859 square foot facility on a 23 acre site, and ties and additions to some of the of existing buildings. Cambro Manufacturing recently completed a 120,000 Future projects may include aerospace related manufac- square foot building on a 12 acre site, a second and third turing activities, such as tank fabrication and assembly, phase will add 160,412 square feet with an ultimate heavy welding, insulation and thermal protections, addi- development of 280,412 square feet. tional office uses can also be accommodated. The remaining acreage in the Planning Area, is current- Additional new industrial development and new activities ly vacant and is expected to be developed with research or reuse plan or restructuring of the existing aerospace and development facilities, light industrial, warehouse operations and facility can be accommodated by the reg- and/or distribution uses. Office uses and some commer- ulations of the. Specific Plan. This area can accommo- cial and entertainment activities may also occur. This date an additional 477,948 square feet of new develop- area can accommodate a total development of ment, for a total development of 3,267,001 square feet. 1,515,888 square feet. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 25 LAND USE SUMMARY Planning Industrial Office Commercial TOTAL Area Use Use Use (sq. ft.) (ac) (sq. ft.) (ac) (sq. ft.) (ac) (sq. ft.) (ac) 1 3,118,837 96 148,164 4 - 3,267,001 100 1A - - 522,720 20 - 522,720 20 2 1,168,595 46.5 247,293 8 100,000 3.5 1,515,880 58 3 705,672 28 235,224 8 - 940,896 36 4 686,070 27 . 228,690 8 - 914,760 35 5 98,450 4 822,950 21 293,600 15 1,215,000 40 TOTAL 5,777,624 201.5 2,205,041 69 393,600 118.5 8,376,265 1289* Note: * indicates net acres. There are 307 gross acres. 18 acres in right-of-way Exhibit 8 AREA 3 AREA 4 Planning Area 3, west of Area 2, includes the Bolsa Planning Area 4 is a ribbon of land on the northern Avenue frontage west of Able Lane to an extension of perimeter of the project area. The area consists of 35 Graham Street. The area is predominately vacant and net acres of vacant land intended to be developed as an consists of 36 net acres. The area is intended to accom- expansion of the current aerospace facility (Planning modate research and design facilities along with light Area 1). An alternative is for all or a portion of the industrial, manufacturing and distribution uses . Office Planning Area 4 to be separated from the aerospace use and limited commercial retail activities along the facility and develop as new research and development Bolsa Avenue frontage may occur. Anticipated develop- facilities, office development, manufacturing, warehous- ment patterns in Area 2 and 3 will be very similar and ing and/or distribution uses. This area can accommo- compatible. This area can accommodate a total devel- date a total development of 914,760 square feet. opment of 940,896 square feet. 26 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan AREA 5 4.1.0 POLICIES: Planning Area 5 is the western boundary of the project 4.1.1 The existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Facility may area, with a significant amount of frontage on the arteri- expand from Planning Area 1 into Planning Areas 1A, 3, al highways. The area consists of 40 net acres and par 4, and 5; concurrent with a Site Plan Review and Parcel tially developed with office, research and development Map application. facilities and surface parking lots. The phase one, of a two phase office development has been completed and 4.1.2 Industrial related uses, particularly light manufacturing, consists of an eight story, 235,831 square foot office assembly and research and development, shall be the building with adjacent parking (constructed in 1989); primary intended activity within the project area and shall phase two proposes a twelve story, 345,551 square foot be permitted in all Planning Areas. office building, with an adjacent 14,000 square foot restaurant and 9,600 square foot of support commercial 4.1.3 Commercial retail uses shall be limited to activities which services. cater to industrial uses (i.e. restaurants, hotels, etc.) and shall be permitted only in Planning Areas 1A, 2, 3, and 5. Future activities for the area will depend on market con- ditions and may include: office, light industrial, research 4.1.4 Industrial related office uses shall be allowed in all and development, and retail commercial uses including Planning Areas with greater concentration anticipated in hotels and restaurants. These development activities Planning Areas 1A, 3, and 5. may be either an expansion of the aerospace facility or independent new projects. This area can accommodate 4.1.5 Development adjacent to residential uses must be sensi- a total development of 1,215,000 square feet. tive to the concerns of the residents. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 27 02 Legend 9Gi 5 •� ♦ Public Street # Major Access Point �G�o •.•'' •.•••• Potential Future • Existing Bus Turnout Access Street OFuture Bus Turnout '• , ••• ��_ RAILROAD TRACKS L— � a • o • F 0 Ca b • a CO SKYLAB ROAD WEST SKYLAB ROAD • v ti X • ¢ • m m � • m � � y • BOLSA AVENUE I -1 Circulation Plan Exhibit 9 " North 28 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.2 CIRCULATION PLAN The Circulation Plan illustrates the general alignments, Rancho Road, a north-south secondary arterial high- classifications, location and design of cross-sections for way (80 foot right-of-way). public and private streets within the area of the Specific Plan. The Circulation Plan is consistent with the Internal circulation is currently provided by a network of Huntington Beach General Plan's Circulation Element. public and private streets serving as access to individual parcels within the project area. Circulation is further Access to the City of Huntington Beach and the enhanced by a number of entry drives and public trans- McDonnell Centre Business Park is provided by two portation facilities. The interior streets within the Specific regional highways; .Interstate 405 and State Route 22 Plan are: Able Lane, Astronautics Drive, Graham Street, (San Diego and Garden Grove Freeways). The City's Skylab Road, and Skylab Road West. Able Lane, Skylab General Plan designates the intersection of Bolsa Chica Road and Skylab Road West are designed for eighty (80) Street and Rancho Road as a primary entry node to the foot right-of-ways; all other interior streets are designed City. Access to the project site is provided by a system with sixty (60) foot right-of-ways. The intersection of of arterial highways including: Skylab Road and Astronautics Drive is all-way stop con- trolled. All other streets stop at their respective intersec- • Bolsa Chica Street, a north-south major arterial high- tion with Skylab Road or Astronautics Drive. There are way (120 foot right-of-way); designated as a truck currently signalized intersections at Graham Street and route and a primary path/image corridor. Bolsa Avenue, Able Lane and Bolsa Avenue and Skylab Road and Springdale Street; and McDonnell Drive and • Springdale Street, a north-south primary arterial high- Bolsa Avenue. In addition a limited number of private way (100 foot right-of-way); designated as a truck driveways provide access to individual parcels from the route and a secondary path/image corridor. surrounding arterial highways. The Circulation Plan is designed to accommodate a • Bolsa Avenue, an east-west major arterial highway number of different development scenarios. The overall (120 foot right-of--way); designated as a truck route, circulation concept relies on a hierarchy of circulation and a primary path/image corridor and landscape features ranging from major arterials to local streets. corridor. The system is designed to accommodate traffic to the project area and around the area while discouraging • Graham Street, a north-south secondary arterial through traffic intrusion into individual Planning Areas. highway (80 foot right-of-way); designated as a truck route. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 29 Property I/ 60' Right-of-Way Property Line �T Line 6'Walk 6' Walk Street Trees 15' Min. 15' 30' Street 15' 15' Min. I, Bld Parkwa 2- 15'Travel Lanes /Parkway\ji Bldg. �I Setback Seth Street Section - Private Street 60' Right of Way (Astronautics Drive) Property Line Property 60' Right-of-Way Line ' Street Trees 6'Walk 6'Walk 25' Min. 12' 25' Min. Bldg. 114' Lane I Painted 14' Lane �J 4' Bldg. Setback Median Setback I Property Property Street Section - Public Street Line 80' Right of Way Line 60' Right of Way (Astronautics Drive) Street Trees Street Trees Screen Hedge 1 Landscape edge Future Future Building I 6'Walk 6'Walk Building Parking 25' Min. 2' 12' 2' Bldg. �14' Lane112' Lane Painted 12' Lane�14' LaneLane112' Lane Painted 12' Lan Setback Lane Setback Median Street Cross Sections Street Section - Public Street 80' Right of Way (Skylab Road and Able Lane ) Exhibit 10 i' 30 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan I The Circulation Plan provides for a phasing of street and designed to provide full turning movements (Exhibit improvements to correspond to the phased development 9). The locations relate to existing driveways and medi- in each Planning Area. All streets shown on the an designs, and are anticipated to adequately serve the Circulation Plan are public streets unless otherwise indi- projected traffic volumes for the project area. Specific cated. future development proposals may require modifications to these anticipated access locations. Astronautics Drive will function as a private road for access to the McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Facility. The circulation system shall be master planned to New development in Planning Area 4, other than an accommodate the buildout of the Specific Plan area. expansion of the aerospace facility, may trigger the need Initial street construction and future phased reconstruc- to further improve Astronautics Drive. New development tion shall be completed in advance of occupancy of new in Planning Area 1A, including expansion of the aero- facility phased construction. The Director of Community space facility, may also bring about the need to extend Development and the Director of Public Works shall the on-site public street system in order to facilitate the approve phasing plans for street improvement construc- creation of additional parcels. This concept is reflected tion, consistent with development construction phasing in the Circulation Plan. This additional public street and implemented through the Parcel Map process. would be designed similar to the other on-site streets with one travel lane in each direction and sixty (60) feet Alternative forms of transportation should also receive of right-of-way. careful consideration. The current OCTA bus route passes the project area on Bolsa Avenue. The project Skylab Road West will remain a private access street, Circulation Plan identifies existing and proposed bus however, it will be improved as an eighty (80) foot right- turnout locations along Bolsa Chica' Street and Bolsa of-way. The need to extend Skylab Road as a public Avenue. As a supplement to vehicular access to the pro- street through the entire project area would only occur if ject area, potential future access may be available from a major reconfiguration of the present aerospace facility the rail line on the northern boundary of the site. The is proposed. This type of major land use change may Circulation Plan preserves access to this line for future require a number of circulation alternatives and layouts, options. however, such a change is not anticipated. In addition, the Master Plan Concept encourages the In order to efficiently facilitate new development parcels, preservation and expansion of the pedestrian walkway the primary access will be from interior streets. Direct system. As a means of achieving a strong landscape j access from adjacent arterials will be subject to review image, pedestrian walkways are required and shall be and approval of the Director of Public Works. Primary provided in the street right-of-way adjacent to new devel- access locations into the project area have been located opment projects. r McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 31 4.2.0 POLICIES: 4.2.1 Skylab Road shall be designed as a major east/west --- street. Skylab Road shall be improved and dedicated , as a public street with an eighty (80) foot right-of-way; O from Springdale Street west to the eastern entry of the aerospace facility. 4.2.2 Able Lane shall be designed as the major north/south street. Able Lane shall be improved and dedicated as a public street with an eighty (80) foot right-of-way from Skylab Road to Bolsa Avenue. i 4.2.3 Skylab Road and Able Lane right-of-ways shall �- include a sixty-four (64) foot curb to curb (allowing for q - two travel lanes in each direction and left turn lanes) I T with sufficient area for a six (6) foot sidewalk and two (2) foot landscape area on both sides of.the street. 4.2.4 Primary access to the project area shall be from the existing signalized intersections of Skylab Road and Springdale Street, Able Lane and Bolsa Avenue, Private Drive Entry Graham Street and Bolsa Avenue, and McDonnell Exhibit 11 Drive and Bolsa Avenue. Other access locations into the project area shall occur only where traffic patterns 4.2.6 Deceleration and acceleration lanes for individual and median openings allow, subject to review and developments may be required, depending on the loca- approval of the Director of Public Works and Fire Chief. tion of the proposed access point. Right turn in and right turn out accesses to the arterial highways shall be 4.2.5 Direct access to individual projects from the arterial considered on an individual project basis, subject to the highways adjacent to the project area shall be limited review and approval of the Director of Public Works. and allowed only when the project, size, location or type of use, warrants such access, subject to review 4.2.7 Shared access facilities and reciprocal vehicular and approval of the Director of Public Works and Fire access to and between individual projects may be Chief (Exhibit 11). requested and/or required by the Director for adjacent uses and parcels. 32 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.2.8 Astronautics Drive will continue to serve as a private 4.2.14 Additional traffic impact analysis may be required, street and shall be designed to accommodate a public due to unanticipated project developments subject to right-of-way of sixty (60) feet, between Rancho Road review and approval by the Directors of Community and the southern terminus. Street dedication will only Development and Public Works. be required if and when warranted by traffic demand, as determined by the Director of Public Works. 4.2.15 The "Trip Generation Budget" identified in the E.I.R. shall be reviewed with each individual project request. 4.2.9 Alternative transportation forms of including OCTA Additional periodic reviews, by the Director of Public Bus System and future rail access, shall be investigat- Works, will also be necessary for overall compliance ed with each development project. with the E.I.R. 4.2.10 Pedestrian sidewalks shall be incorporated into each 4.2.16 Circulation system improvements shall be master development project as a component of an individual planned to accommodate ultimate buildout of the projects landscape plan. Sidewalks shall be installed Specific Plan. On-site and off-site circulation improve- on both sides of the street adjacent to new develop- ments shall be completed prior to occupancy of any ment throughout the project area. adjacent new development. 4.2.11 Public landscape areas within the right-of-ways will require a separate Parkway Landscape Agreement from the adjacent property owner, for continued main- tenance of the area. 4.2.12 Public and private streets shall be developed to local street standards as shown in the Standard Plans of the City's Public Works Department. 4.2.13 On-street parking shall not be permitted anywhere in the project area, on both and public streets. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 33 �• ` '�*-EXIST. 8' FUTURE 1 ri�j�,':�• •: Legend L� \' � EXISTING FIRE WATER LINE AREA 4C` �"I �� ``\ --------- EXISTING WATER LINE ✓::o , r- - - L,• PROPOSED WATER LINE FUTURE 16' i�'� ----- -- FUTURE WATER LINE I FUTURE 16"— %` --- PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY � 11 _—r� II _�--�oitrood lrocuy 1 �' 11 '1 , EX. 10'-11 FUTURE IT / o0 5 � 1 1 . 1 PROP. 1 ANNIN AREA 1 1 I ,C;;B"„ArPROPO,, . 1Ir j EX. 1 i II , .a. 1 `y FUT RE IIr 1 i EX. 31V PLANNING AREA 2 ; EX. 1Z ' EX. lr 1 a ANNING AR 1 ---------- -- -- FUTURE 16• a I I �y I I 1 EX. 1SHORP 1 J 1 I g II PLANNING AREA 1A PLANNIN AREA 3 1 1 i 1 1 � -� _----_ __-_ -�F; - ------9GL_SA---------------- -- ---- 11 - --- - ------------ ___-------_----L---- ---JI -___ EX 1r------------- 11 EX. 1 r ' 11 11 Water System Plan 0005r� Exhibit 12 North �(�✓� 34 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.3 PUBLIC FACILITIES PLANS The Public Facilities Plans identify existing and proposed MWD is the major wholesale water purveyor to the City infrastructure, storm drain, sewer and water facility of Huntington Beach which, in turn, is the retail provider improvements to serve development within the Specific to all water users in the City, including the subject prop- Plan area. A specific analysis of infrastructure require- erty. The existing and proposed water supply systems ments and detailed design, construction and phasing are shown on the Water System Plan (Exhibit 12). On- plans can be found in the Infrastructure Master Plan site water lines can connect to the external system at Technical Appendix to the E.I.R. and bound under a sep- more than one location to provide a second point of ser- arate cover. vice (or loop) to each part of the system. All the on-site lines will be sized to deliver fire flow at adequate quanti- 4.3.0 POLICY: ties and pressures and are eight (8) to sixteen (16) inch- es in diameter. Developers within the Specific Plan area will be respon- sible for the construction of public facilities improvements All water improvements will be designed to the City of concurrent with individual project development, subject Huntington Beach water standards for future City accep- to review and approval of the Director of Public Works. tance and maintenance. The existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (MDA) water systems facility will be 4.3.1 Water System Plan connected, through meters, to the proposed additions to the City's water system, but will remain independent of Domestic water for the property will be provided by the the City's system. Locations of fire hydrants and appa- Public Works Water Division of the City of Huntington ratuses will be reviewed for each individual development Beach. The Water Division provides water to all of the by the Fire Department and Water Division of the City of customers within the City of Huntington Beach. Huntington Beach to ensure adequate fire flow and pres- sure. The Water Division has use of both underground and imported water sources to service the area. The under- ground supply comes from nine existing wells, and imported water delivered to the City of Huntington Beach by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) at three loca- tions. The Specific Plan area is part of the City's Master Plan for Water Service and the ultimate development anticipated will be adequately served by the City's sys- tems. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 35 Legend FUTURE 8' SEWER — ------�-- EXISTING SEWER LINE -FVTURE 8' SEWER / PLANNIN PROPOSED SEWER LINE ---� ---4 "=AFjg'A 4 �'-- -- «�-`---- - __—_- ----)� __:___'_ a� / , . a--►--- POSSIBLE FUTURE SEWER -- us _— - ---__- r EXIST. ,r SEWER ` �,/ �.� PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY ALTERNATIVE SEWER dp, -� CONNECTIONS - TO EXISTING 1 Y BOLSA ` 10' acr FLIT SEWER ¢ I 1 I � '-� POSSIBLE / FUTURE 11T SEWER I Railroad T•oc�s POSSIBLE I � i FUTURE 147 S� R � 1 0 I N 1 R PLANNING' AREA 1 'I •µ 1 i i i 1 FUTURE 1 ' EWER f UTURE 8' SEWER --- --------- SKYItB 1-ST--- - ------1-- -- --- 1 ' SEE,AIItERNATE { R � � ' 1 SEWER FLOW REDIRECTION CONNECTION 1 FTOw FROM AREASOIiTFI N OF SM1AB TO BE RE061ECTED --- ---AT TOP ' TO PROPOSED uu NA u+VCW MO ASTROUTICS. 1 1 i FUTURE W SEW R { -- 1 �F�tT. 8' SEWER � r—— ——— _ i I I t FUTURE 8' SEWER // `� i 1 EXISTING 1 Y SEWER PLANNING AREA 5 ;._— FUTURE e' SEWER _-�`�` } PLANNING AREA 2 1 SHARP 13 F R 6'� CLEMON S FORCE MAIN, N NG AREA 1A i l PLANNING REA 3 1 1 � ' -------�— --------- --r--------- ---------- I -------- ----- ----.4 EXISTING 1 Y SEWER 1; EXISTING 1 Y SEWER NfER _ _ i` R 1 ' EW R EXISTING 17 SEWER — EXISTING 24" SEWER Sewer System Plan A // Exhibit 13 North 36 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.3.2 Sewer System Plan The City of Huntington Beach is responsible for the The existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (MDA) facil- review and approval of the collection of wastewater with- ity private sewer system will not be connected to the gro- in the project area, and the County Sanitation Districts of posed peripheral sewer systems, and will remain isolat- Orange County (CSDOC) are responsible for the treat- ed from this new system, and will remain so as long as' ment of wastewater. The Sewer System Plan (Exhibit the existing aerospace facility remains. The existing 13) depicts the existing sewer system which serves the MDA sewer system has sufficient capacity as a stand project area. The existing system is comprised of sever- alone system. al lines, including twelve (12) inch lines in Able Lane; an eight (8) inch line located in Skylab Road east of Able Sewer lines within the property will be contained in pub- Lane and a fifteen (15) inch line located in Skylab Road lic or private roads or in easements that will ultimately be west of Able Lane to Astronautics. These existing sys- dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. Due to the tems connect to the City sewer in Bolsa Avenue. existing flat, natural grade within the project area, pipe sizes will be in the range of eight (8) inch minimum to fif- The City system ultimately is collected by the Sanitation teen (15) inch maximum with the need to incorporate a District via their trunk and distribution lines to convey private lift station and six (6) inch force main at Bolsa sewage to their plant. District Plant #5 is located in Chica/Skylab. Also, the sewer system will be designed Fountain Valley, and District Plant #2 is easterly of the to the City of Huntington Beach sewer standards for pos- City approximately twelve miles from the project area. sible future public acceptance and maintenance. The Sewer service for the property is collected at two loca- proposed sanitary sewer system is shown on the Sewer tions. One is at the intersection of Bolsa Avenue and System Plan (Exhibit 13). Graham Road, then via a twenty-four (24) inch line southerly to the Sanitation District trunk line in Edinger Avenue and continuing to the District plant #2. This sys- tem also collects the sewerage flows from the residential area northerly of the property. The second collection point is at the intersection of Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street then via a twelve (12) inch line southerly to the Sanitation District's trunk,line in Edinger Avenue. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 37 J i PL Legend AREA 4 ------------ -- EXISTING STORM DRAIN f Altronoutics POSSIB FUTURE RCP PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE - PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY po POSSIBLE FUTURE 39- RCP POSSAE FUTURE Railroad Trucks « 3 RCP / ` 4 PLANNING AREA 1 ^ 1 I ° P4SFIBLE FUTUR I RCP ° 0 11 P a I _ 1 CAMBRO i i F 15Q •.�E1' RCPNG ST. 80" RCP ST. 80- RCP I ST. 4x' RCPI M.N PROP. W RCP ' PROP.1W RCP RROP. W RCP PROP. 72- RCP , I PROP. 42 RCP, DRAINAGE LINE 11 11 -- 1 � I 1 1 (V 1 11 ;mast RCP i PROP. P (PROP. 8 RCP Ta r I --_--_-- PLANNING AREA 2 It 11 � i i15 4'�1 I -� 2 EXLSP. W RCP k` ANNING AREA 5 , -------- - 1 S HAR P ELECTRONICS I Q 1 PLANNING AREA 1A PLANNIN AREA 3 ; l i EX.172• RCP I� 1 I 1 EXISI•. 63- RCP 11or 1 ' 1 • I 0 ' 1 ---- ---- 1 1 -- --.�-- -- It -- 1 1 BOLSA 1? t �•l EX. 89- RCP . 24- RCP 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 WESTMINSTER CHANNEL C-4 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I ----------- ----------- Storm Drainage Plan Exhibit 14 North I 38 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan i 4.3.3 Storm Drainage Plan The City of Huntington Beach and the Orange County Anaheim Barber City Channel. The project's most east- Flood Control District are the agencies responsible for erly area and southerly areas are currently tabled to the flood control system in the project vicinity. Regional drain into the newly constructed storm drain system adja- flood control channels exist along Bolsa Chica Street and cent to Bolsa Avenue, as approved by the O.C.F.C.D. Springdale Street. The Bolsa Chica channel, an open and the City of Huntington Beach Master Plan of channel, is located adjacent to the western boundary of Drainage programs for these proposed systems. No Bolsa Chica Street. The existing storm drain system pro- detention basins, outside of Planning Area 1, will be nec- vides drainage for the site, draining the majority of the essary to serve the existing and proposed ultimate devel- site to the west, towards Bolsa Chica channel. A small opment. Only the peripheral edges, which can be eastern portion of the site drains to the channel adjacent accommodated now by the existing downstream facilities to the eastern boundary of Springdale Street. and piped systems in place, are being considered at this time. The residential drainage areas northerly of the pro- There are three existing storm drain systems surround- ject area have their own area drainage facilities, and do ing the project area: The area to the east draining not affect the proposed property. southerly into the Orange County Flood Control District. (O.C.F.C.D.) C-4 Westminster Channel; and the area to The storm drain systems are considered to be the south draining westerly into the O.C.F.C.D. C-2 Bolsa Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) with the minimum pipe Chica Channel; the areas to the west and to the north size of eighteen (18) inches. The pipe sizes are esti- drain to the O.C.F.C.D. C-2 Bolsa Chica Channel and to mated for planning purposes only and are subject to the C-3 Anaheim Barber City Channel, respectively. refinement in the final design of the project. The storm Through the approximate center of the property, drains lie within existing private streets or within ease- drainage is piped westerly to the O.C.F.C.D. C-2 Bolsa ments to allow for maintenance of the completed system. Chica Channel. This piped system is at its maximum All drainage is on-site and only the termination of the trib- capacity, serving the existing McDonnell Douglas aero- utary facilities, as they propose to enter into the space facilities. O.C.F.C.D. channels, will require any jurisdiction permis- sion for public right-of-way construction. The existing In the event that the MDA facility would no longer remain, downstream facilities will have negligible flow impacts and the area became available for new development, the based upon the proposed ultimate development Master Plan Drainage Study proposes to provide a new drainage calculations. The entire drainage system for piped drainage facility paralleling the existing (or replace the project is shown on the Storm Drainage Plan (Exhibit ing the existing entirely), draining to the C-2 Bolsa Chica 14). The ultimate location and sizes of the proposed Channel. The areas proposed at the project's northerly storm drain lines may vary from that shown on the plan. boundary will drain northerly into the O.C.F.C.D. C-3 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 39 4.3.4 Water Quality Water quality. in California is regulated by the U.S. reduce the pollution of downstream waters. Typical ele- Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollution ments of such a BMP program would include addressing Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), which controls the use of oil and grease traps, detention basins, vege- the discharge of pollutants to water bodies from point tation filter strips, and other common techniques in order and non-point sources. A NPDES permit or other E.P.A. to preclude discharge of pollutants to local storm drains review will be required for individual construction pro- and channels. jects. 4.3.5 Utilities Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the developer shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the There are several public utility service providers in the required fee to the State Water Resources Control Board McDonnell Centre Business Park area. to be covered under the State NPDES General Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of Although adequate facilities exist for the current service the written reply containing the discharger's identification needs of the area, additional facilities may be required as number. The NPDES permit process does require that a additional development occurs. permit application contain a project drainage report, along with the submittal of the Storm Water Pollution 4.3.6 Electricity Prevention Plan (SWPPP) worksheet. Both the report and the worksheet identify any watercourses affected by Electrical service to the area is provided by the Southern construction activity, and a comprehensive listing of California Edison Company. Existing transmission and drainage Best Management Practice (BMP) mitigations distribution lines are adequate to service current and that must be provided. potential future needs. Individual development projects may be required to relocate or underground existing Through the NPDES Permit process, the City currently facilities concurrent with other improvements and consis- requires contributors to non-point runoff pollution to tent with the City's Undergrounding Ordinance (17.64). establish Best Management Practices (BMP's) to mini- An exception to this provision is the 66Kv line adjacent to mize the potential for pollution. Under this program, the Able Lane. developer is responsible for identification and implemen- tation of a program of BMP's which can include special scheduling of project activities, prohibitions of certain practices, establishment of certain maintenance proce- dures, and other management practices to prevent or 40 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.3.7 Natural Gas Natural gas service in the Specific Plan area is provid- ed by the Southern California Gas Company. Adequate facilities exist for current and projected future needs. Developers may be required to relocate existing facilities concurrent with project development. 4.3.8 Telephone Telephone service in the Specific Plan area is provide by General Telephone (GTE). Developers should coor- dinate with GTE for the relocation of existing facilities and installation of new service. 4.3.9 Cable Television ` Cable television service within Huntington Beach is provided by Time Warner Communications. Developers should coordinate with the Cable Company for the installation of new service. 4.3.10 Solid Waste Disposal Rainbow Disposal Company currently provides solid waste disposal services for the area. Based on service projections and anticipated demand increase, an ade- quate level of service will be maintained. No solid waste disposal facilities are planned to be located in the Specific Plan area. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 41 OExisting Perimeter Landscaping ;;..,, O5 Typical Entry Plaza O9 Typical Street Tree Parking m` `•. (1-24"Box Tree,20'On-Center) �2 Landscaping Buffer Private Drive Ent rY 10 McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Entry O Landscape Buffer t�7 Typical Parking Lot 11 Typical Building Seperation (1 Tree/6Parking Spaces) O Typical Entry Drive ".,." 8 Typical Pedestrian 12 Typical On-Site Landscape (so'wide w/ i` t, Walkway (s'Wide) Improvements stamped concrete) � ;�� +`. >� - 6 ' ,N. y x� F� z,,,Yt^a�`n�� •,,,?�:x�tt uE �z .sy j a �� � .�, .F�- ,,���«_`-'�.."e',k�. m`�" �. {itll .�,Yvd��#i�l�i�k�',. t ;e+,"„3 may%,, ::"�,:,:� �•: Z. "> �",:yp •\NFF a!a »., ,t".r.'.., °�,' 9, G't,,. ,'."�,. � �r =� .;�-rR` , 7 r 10 7 6 11 12 Landscape Concept Plan Exhibit 15 North Note: This illustrative shows a hypothetical development scenario on the project site. �—� 42 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.4 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT The Landscape Concept for the McDonnell Centre way shall be consistent with one another in size, appear- Business Park is an integral component of the overall ance, and signage. Major entryway locations into the project design. The Landscape Concept is intended to project area will allow for the business park entry monu- establish the design character and visual qualities of the ment signs within the perimeter landscaping. interior and perimeter of the project area. The overall landscape theme is composed of several design ele- Project area walls screening and fencing along the ments, including: the public arterials, local and private perimeter arterials shall be compatible for each project streets, entryways, access drives, parkway areas, tran- and provide project identity, privacy and noise control. sitional edges and security fencing and walls which cre- Individual wall treatments shall reflect the architectural ' ate a cohesive project area image. character of the adjacent main buildings and be compat- ible with other buildings throughout the project area. i To establish a consistent planting streetscape, all streets Walls along individual property lines shall be designed to shall be established with identifiable landscape materi- provide security and privacy while providing visual com- als, drawn from the Plant Palette. The Plant Materials patibility; see-through wrought iron fencing may be effec- Palette (Exhibit 38) includes turf, shrubs, ground cover tively incorporated as a security element. and trees which are compatible with the City's overall landscaping requirements and consistent with the exist- The Landscape Concept establishes the primary unify- ing adjacent streetscape. ing design element for the project area. The streetscape design is intended to preserve and enhance the existing The landscape plan for each parcel shall be designed to layout and variety of landscape patterns. This includes reflect the overall Landscape Concept. Individual project the incorporation of landscaped areas adjacent to the landscaping shall be designed to conform with the perimeter arterials, landscaped pedestrian walkways Specific Plan's Landscape Guidelines (Section 5.3). within the right-of-way of interior streets, the preserva- Planning and installation of each project's landscaping tion of existing tree lines, where feasible, and creating a shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of consistency of design for private drives, access points Public Works. Off-site improvements for each develop- and parking lot layouts. ment shall include a landscape area with a six (6) foot sidewalk. Pedestrian walkways shall be required on The Landscape Concept is intended to create an overall both sides of all public and private streets as a neces- theme with specific guidelines. However, alternative sary unifying component to the landscape theme. approaches may be considered which preserve the intent of the guidelines while proposing modifications to Entryways to the project area and individual develop- the regulations. All individual landscape plans shall ments must be carefully designed. Each private drive comply with the following policies. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 43 4.4.0 POLICIES: 4.4.1 Perimeter landscaping shall preserve or construct, a 4.4.2 Landscape medians, located in the arterial highways minimum twenty-four (24) foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the project area, shall be designed and con- between the arterial highway and private project structed per City of Huntington Beach standards and improvements, including buildings, walls, parking areas, approvals, and shall be maintained by the City. etc (Exhibit 16). Property ■ line i ea e eee aia Arterial Highway 36" Min. height y 6' Walk 24' Landscape buffer Landscaping on Perimeter Streets Landscape Detail Exhibit 16 C�L 44 'McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.4.3 Private landscape improvements and adjacent right- 4.4.10 Existing healthy trees (as determined by a consulting of way landscape improvements shall be constructed arborist) removed as part of landscape improvements by individual project developers and maintained by shall be replaced on a two for one basis with thirty-six each adjacent/abutting property owner, consistent with (36) inch box trees or an approved equivalent, as the overall landscape theme. determined by the Director of Public Works. 4.4.4 Private landscape improvements shall provide suffi- 4.4.11 All landscaping shall conform with the requirements cient landscaping to implement the Landscape of Chapter 232 (Landscape Improvements) of the Concept and shall incorporate a minimum of ten (10) Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, percent of the net project site. the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications and City Standard Plans, in addition to 4.4.5 Landscape buffer-areas shall be provided in transi- the Specific Plan policies in Section 5.3.0. tional edges between abutting Planning Areas, if not , separated by a public or private street. A minimum ;, y buffer area shall be fifty (50) feet in width and shall ' include landscaping and berming to atlequately screen adjacent uses. 4.4.6 Landscaped buffer areas shall be maintained by the private development in accord with the project area landscape theme. 4.4.7 Private project entryways shall be designed with enhanced landscaping area, textured pavement and be able to accommodate entry monumentation and light- ing. 4.4.8 Slope areas shall be permanently landscaped with water efficient plant materials, and erosion control methods acceptable to the Director of Public Works. 4.4.9 Irrigation systems shall comply with the City's "Water Pedestrian Walkway Efficient Landscape Requirements." (Ordinance Exhibit 17 #1452). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 45 9N 02 Planning 5� Area 4 Subarea G �G �P Planning Planning Area 3 Area 2 Ilk- � Subarea C Subarea M RAILROAD TRACKSL— A � ubarea F Subarea H 01CO Planning ! o SKYLAB ROAD WEST Area 1 ' SKYLAB ROAD Subarea I Subarea B Subarea A Subarea L m �••-•-• m �i U / _;•-_-'� '�' Planning ._._._. Area 1 A Subarea E ;Subarea J r ' Subarea K Subama D i 1 ' �.r. •�� BOLSA AVENUEL. y Planning m Area 5 Phasing Plan Exhibit 18 North 46 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 4.5 PHASING PLAN The McDonnell Centre Business Park will be developed In later phases infrastructure improvements will be in various phases over the next several years. In order extended west along the southern boundary of the pro- to accommodate the anticipated intermittent develop- ject area. This extension of services will facilitate a vari- ment patterns, all required circulation, infrastructure and ety of new development options in Planning Areas 1A community improvements within each Planning Area of and 5. Later phases of development will follow the mar- the Specific Plan shall be completed prior to, or simulta- ket trends and build out accordingly. neously with, individual projects. Planning Area 4 will most likely be the last area to devel- The Specific Plan Planning Areas (1, 1A, 2, 3, 4, & 5) op. The most likely scenario for this Planning Area is to have been further divided into Subareas (A thru M) to remain part of the aerospace facility. The area is well reflect the anticipated development pattern and infra- suited and situated for expansion of the present aero- structure improvement phasing. The Phasing Plan pre- space facility, and will provide for an opportunity to sents a schedule of project development based on an replace lost parking, as new development projects occur incremental installation of infrastructure improvements. on the existing aerospace parking lots. The utilities nec- essary for expansion of the aerospace facilities may be The Phasing Plan recognizes that the project area is sufficient with the existing services, depending on the presently almost forty (40) percent built-out, including the nature of the projects. Independent new development of McDonnell Douglas Aerospace Facilities, with an addi- Planning Area 4 will trigger the need for the extension of tional ten (10) percent under construction and/or entitled. utility lines from the first phase improvements in Areas 2 The first phase for new projects will occur in the eastern and 3. portion of the Specific Plan area. The western portion, along Bolsa Chica Street, will develop in later phases, as The maximum permitted floor area for all industrial, office the market conditions warrant, however there is the and commercial developments within the Specific Plan potential for a hotel project at Bolsa Chica Street and Area shall not exceed the General Plan floor area ratio Skylab Road West. The infrastructure phasing schedule (F.A.R.) of .75. The cumulative square footage of floor has been prepared to provide assurance that adequate area for each of the allowed uses within the Specific Plan public facilities and services will be available for each have been estimated for each Planning Area; however, new project. these numbers may be modified and transferred as mar- ket conditions and/or development concepts dictate. The first phase of the infrastructure improvements will Any modifications and/or adjustment to land use square extend, install and upgrade the utilities necessary to pro- footage ratios must comply with the "Trip Generation vide for new projects in Planning Areas 2 and 3. Total Budget" and other provisions identified in the E.I.R. and first phase of infrastructure improvements will be com- City's General Plan. pleted by the year 1998. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 47 ��=— Infrastructure Improvements Planning Area 2 5 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 1A 1 1 Sub Area A B C D E F G H I J K L M Sewer • • • • • • Storm Drain • • • • • Water • • • • • • Streetpaving • • • • • • • • • • • • • Lighting • • • • • • • • • • • • • Asphalt Overla • • • • 4—• • • • • • • • Traffic Signal d • • Note: To be implemented through the Parcel Map process. No additional infrastructure improvements will be required for a continuation of the existing aerospace activities. Schedule of Improvements Planning Area 2 5 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 1A 1 1 Sub Area A B C D E F G H I J K L M 1998 100% 100% 2000 100% 100% 25% 50% 50% 2005 50% 50% 25% 2010 25% 50% 25% 25% 50% 2015 25% 25% 25% 50% 100% 2020 25% 100% 25% 100% Exhibit 19 i I 48 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan !� i DESIGN GUIDELINES if ii m; Fi 10 . 8; .................... A. Section Five McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 49 do ;',NOW Oro No so or ON Ion, WOMMOL /Zi DESIGN GUIDELINES 5.0 PROJECT AREA CHARACTER 5.1 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES The Design Guidelines establish the character and style The Specific Plan anticipates a combination of industrial, for the development of a business park complex with office, and commercial buildings, each varying in parcel buildings and streetscapes that have a distinctive visual size, building height, and intensity of development. The identity. The Guidelines accommodate individual devel- Design Guidelines section provides the measure by opment identities and promote interrelationships which basic concepts for coordinated site planning can between complementary land uses and community fea- be realized. Care must be taken in the creation of each tures. The major elements of the Design Guidelines parcel in the project area to provide convenient access, include: site planning, architecture, streetscape, land- and cluster common activities. Effective site planning scaping, and signage. All development proposals within techniques will establish a strong outline and framework the Specific Plan area shall conform to the Design for guiding future individual development projects, and Guidelines and shall incorporate appropriate theme ele- create a unique high quality business park. ments. The successful integration of effective site planning tech- The Design Guidelines are to be used by the private niques, with the basic design elements on individual pro- developer and the City of Huntington Beach as part of jects, will enhance the visual experience in the Specific the Site Plan Review process. The Design Guidelines Plan area, and promote a true sense of place. The exist- are general and may be interpreted with some flexibility ing McDonnell Douglas facilities along Bolsa Avenue and in their application to specific projects. Variations may be Bolsa Chica Street and the development of Cambro considered for projects with special design characteris- Manufacturing and Sharp Electronics on the eastern tics that still meet the objectives of the Guidelines. The boundary have established a high quality of design. Design Guidelines shall be used to promote a high level of design quality while at the same time provide some Future development of the remaining parcels will be in flexibility, necessary to encourage creativity on the part accordance with many of the established initial design of individual project designers. concepts, in order to achieve an overall project area compatibility. The Design Guidelines have been prepared to articulate the intended development standards of the Specific Plan area. The Guidelines establish a framework for devel- opers/designers of individual projects; and design crite- ria, which the City will use to evaluate proposed devel- opments. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 51 View diffused by landscape screen _ 1111' View diffused by View blocked by wall landscape screen 10' maximum wall height View s`�= Screening of Loading and Storage Areas Site Planning Detail Exhibit 21 52 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan II To facilitate the development of the McDonnell Centre 5.1.4 Loading and storage areas including truck access Business Park into a unique resource for the commu- shall be in the rear and /or side portions of the lot, and nity, the following site planning policies shall be com- screened from the street. All truck maneuvers (i.e. plied with. backing into truck loading areas) shall be performed within the project site (Exhibit 21). 5.1.0 POLICIES: 5.1.5 Site access to the individual projects shall provide the 5.1.1. Site layout for individual projects shall be designed to minimum required turning radius (inside radius of sev- route people and vehicles through the site in a clear, enteen (17) feet and outside radius of fory-five (45) identifiable, efficient and effective manner (Exhibit 20). feet) and roadway widths for all drive aisles and fire lanes (twenty-four (24) feet), consistent with the adopt- 5.1.2 Building orientation and access §hall be designed ed City standard. Additional fire and emergency con- compatible , with previously constructed and/or siderations shall be addressed on a project by project approved projects. Building entryways, administration basis, subject to review and approval of the Fire Chief areas and other window areas shall front on to any (Exhibit 23). adjacent street (Exhibit 22). 5.1.6 On-site circulation and access should be compatible 5.1.3 Parking for individual projects shall be provided on and enhance adjacent developments. Shared drive- site in a manner that is convenient and compatible with ways and entry locations may be proposed. Driveways the layout and design of the overall project area. In and entrances on opposite sides of a street shall align. order to create larger building setbacks surface parking Any proposed offset of driveways on opposite sides of facilities shall be located between the main building a street shall be subject to review and approval of the front facade and any adjacent street. A buildings side Director of Public Works (Exhibit 22). facade may abut a street subject to the setback provi- sions in the Development Regulations section (Section Six). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 53 •J /f �• a�jr r• s , r r , IMF �r., t��� . r'� �y7 ■.!! ■l1,: %i,� �' `�yy,am�. .+�.. _�\. � t ��\!!�' !a'. ..� ��►. �iiL :•■Iwo• / it..� On I i 5.1.7 Entry drives shall be of a uniform size and design throughout the project area. Main and secondary entrances shall be thirty (30) feet wide. Loading area access drives shall be forty (40) feet wide (Exhibit 23). 5.1.8 Handicap accessibility shall be incorporated into all individual project plans and must reflect sensitivity to the needs and requirements of handicapped employ- ees and visitors. The California Accessibility Code (Title 24) requirements shall be considered as a mini- mum set of guidelines. All accessways and parking layouts shall be handicap accessible and convenient. d 1 5.1.9 Energy conservation techniques are encouraged and shall be provided on a project by project basis. 5.1.10 Security provisions, including lighting, building entrance visibility and drive locations, shall be careful- Street 30' ly considered, and subject to review and approval of the Director of Public Works and the Police Department. Typical Entry Drive Exhibit 23 5.1.11 Relationship to adjacent sites shall be considered concurrent with individual project layout. Projects shall be "off-set" to minimize views directly into opposing buildings McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 55 p- 41 Awe"], -7, rr & 271- 0"-w ......... :Ww F 0- 4911*11- J iC 'v Architectural Details Exhibit 24 56 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.2 ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES F] q The Architectural Guidelines are intended to establish a compatible character, style and quality for all develop- ment projects within the McDonnell Centre Business Park. This compatibility of character is not intended to discourage individual innovation and creativity, but to simply provide a framework within which an overall sense of community and place will be reinforced. The architectural theme shall reflect a contemporary research and development complex. Each project shall be designed and sighted with sensitive,,regard to climate, context, and proper use of materials and form in an hon- 7711",n� '51 7g, R W est expression of function as well as aesthetics. wa Building design shall comply with the following architecX.- tural policies. 'k, %_3 OW 5.2.0 POLICIES: All Buildings) _ 5 t ' T 0 5.2.1 Building location, massing and orientation on the indi- W' vidual building sites, shall provide a balance in form and composition. 5.2.2 Building massing shall possess a balance in form and ON611 composition; large flat unarticulated building elevations shall not be permitted adjacent to a public street. '00 5.2.3 Building articulation and fenestration are required to 4 avoid large flat building walls. Building elevations can also be enhanced with second story areas and/or vault- Building Articulation ed areas establishing a variety in building volumes and Exhibit 25 composition (Exhibit 25). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 57 5.2.7 Glazing shall -be tinted with high-performance materi- W als (glazing colors, transparency and reflectiveness shall be limited to green, blue, and light gray shades. Clear or lightly tinted glazing is also acceptable). 5.2.8 Mechanical equipment, shall be screened from view of adjacent property. Mechanical equipment shall not be exposed on the wall surface or roof of a building. Screening material and color shall be compatible with the overall building design and colors, no lattice work is allowed. Backflow devices, electrical transformers and other mechanical equipment, located out of or within setback areas, shall be screened from public view or undergrounded, with the exception of public safety fea- tures. 5.2.9 Exterior lighting shall be located and designed to min- imize direct glare beyond the parking lot or service Typical Building Entry area. Light standards under thirty-five (35) feet in Exhibit 26 height are recommended throughout a project area 5.2.4 Building relationships shall be designed with consid- and shall illuminate all sidewalks and connecting walk- eration to the proper screening of adjacent projects. ways. All light standards shall be consistent with Special attention shall be given to maintain the highest respect to design, materials, color and color of light, quality of design, harmony and compatibility. and with the overall architectural style of the project. 5.2.5 Building entries shall be obvious. A clearly defined, 5.2.10 Trash enclosures for refuse containers and equip- primary pedestrian entry, with an enhanced hard- ment shall be easily accessed by service vehicles and scaped foreground, is required for each building screened from public view. Refuse containers and (Exhibit 26). equipment shall be located within a building's facade or within a screened enclosure, and reflect the architec- 5.2.6 Building materials, colors and finishes shall be cho- tural style of the main building, including the use Of SiM7 sen from a palette of subtle tones (white, off white, light ilar materials. Landscaping shall be provided on each gray and beige);l projects are encouraged to use color side of all screened enclosures within parking areas. accents. 58 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan POLICIES: (Industrial Buildings) 5.2.11 Building design shall avoid a single dominant mass. These facades shall include a major entry feature and Substantial variations in massing should include architectural variation over at least fifteen (15) percent changes in height and horizontal plane. The horizontal of the facade's linear surface. The entry feature treat-, mass of the building elevations may be broken up with ment shall be an integral part of the building design, a external treatment detached from the main building monolithic appearance shall be avoided (Exhibit 25). structure. Such massing breaks, include: columns, colonnades, trellises, wall segment textures, materials, Building corner situations shall incorporate special pattern or color and enhanced landscape treatment. architectural treatment on elevations, visible from a The extent of massing breaks and building projections public street. Any special facade treatment shall be shall relate visually to the overall scale of the building. continued around the building (Exhibit 28). UM All ' r•, ':3,,: ' Diu ';;pzxx:✓:" iiysi, og OR s a , ,':.M• -;: %-;, ....red-.: � .� �`�._:".»" .,r .4., : a Typical Building Wall Exhibit 27 �• u . « , ' Blank walls shall avoid blank areas between massing breaks, especially along facades immediately visible from adjacent streets or walkways. This can be Building Corner Treatment accomplished with a change in surface texture, Exhibit 2s revealed pilaster, a change in building planes, a verti- 5.2.12 Building entries shall be emphasized by design fea- cal variation of the roof line, window placement and /or tures such as overhangs, recesses, walls and roof intensified accent landscaping (Exhibit 27).. forms that are integrated into the overall building design. Greater height can be.used to highlight and Building walls visible from public streets shall be espe- accentuate entries (Exhibit 26). cially attractive, blank flat facades shall be avoided. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 59 5.2.15 Satellite structures (detached) can provide an effec- : :ys '` tive variety in building layout and design; provided i can also be an efficient solution for company opera- :::. OW,O , tions. Satellite structures must be designed to be com- y Not= patible with the main structure and of the same materi- ui k worm � "�' o.rsc% r.r als. .. Worm NWVr ' M` 5.2.16 Loading areas shall be designed to include attractive '.� and durable materials, and conform with other guide- lines pertaining to building features, materials and fin- ishes. Fixed hardware for rolling doors shall be locat- ed on the inside of buildings to minimize visual clutter. Loading docks and outdoor storage areas shall not Building Materials Variety face streets. These areas must be screened with a Exhibit 29 solid decorative wall or berm. Where views of these features are possible from streets or connecting walk- 5.2.13 Building materials may be a combination of concrete, ways, they shall be screened through the use of walls, metal, glass and/or other contemporary composites. trellises, tall landscaping, or equivalent features. Concrete tilt-up construction can be an integral compo- Loading docks shall be provided at a lower grade, nent of building design ( Exhibit 29). where practical, to minimize views from the street and 5.2.14 Mechanical equipment such as ventilation devices, the need for tall walls or fencing (Exhibit 21). louvers, exposed flashing, tanks, overhead doors, and 5.2.17 Outdoor storage shall not exceed ten (10) feet in other service doors shall be finished consistent with the height. All outdoor storage areas must be screened color scheme of the building. Cyclone blowers shall be consistent with the loading area provisions. The wall screened and located below the fascia or roofline of a height shall be sufficient to screen the loading areas building. These devices shall be located at the rear and vehicles and trailers from view of adjacent proper- and painted to match the color scheme of the building. ties and streets and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in Mechanical equipment, located adjacent to but height (Exhibit 21). detached from the main building, shall be screened with compatible building and/or landscape materials. L�L 60 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan POLICIES: (Commercial/Office Buildings) 5.2.18 Building designs shall reflect an industrial/office R „ £} theme and include a recognizable base and top. The A base shall visually relate to the proportion and scale of the building. Contrasting materials, textures and color are encouraged on the base of buildings that face streets or connecting walkways, especially adjacent to major entries. Building rooflines are encouraged to , take advantage of the visual prominence of a building's silhouette, office and entry area may include: cornice treatments roof overhangs and brackets richly tex- •.� ss "^„'' #:R i'ra.6`'{,s;;i:" tured materials, and/or different color of materials y'= Exhibit 30 a ' ?r• :. .p:x : =F '.._ yy�..yy :. „ ..• �!sv,� XZ: S st''Yg•,''fwi%15�3 .ai �;;�'�`;x> r,Fz:,,-> "iz"'.&.,'i";£w'i,'`.x,ti..t: > .Y4 -�s"�`, w•,fi;:i.">s• ,:3, u£ In MW „-a, Office Facade Emma Exhibit 31 5.2.19 Building materials may be a combination of contem- WN porarycomposites and compatible with the industrial buildings materials list (Exhibit 31). .....,1z 5.2.20 Illumination of buildings and landscaping can be indirect, to create a strong positive image. Concealing x .•P light fixtures within buildings and landscaping can high- . light attractive features. Use of lighting is especially recommended at entries, plazas, parking lots, and other areas where evening activity is expected. Commercial Facade Exhibit 30 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 61 14' Minimum 10" Caliper Tree Diameter New Parking ovRequired Screen !e Hedge 6' Minimum Clear on all sides of tree II �I �. % Sidewalk Existing Trees Preservation of Existing Trees Landscape Detail Exhibit 32 62 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.3 LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES The Landscape Concept for the McDonnell Centre 5.3.2 Existing healthy trees, to the greatest extent feasible, Business Park is an integral component of the overall shall be preserved and maintained on site. Where project design. The Landscape Concept is composed preservation is not possible, existing healthy trees of several design and implementation elements; strong should be relocated. If healthy trees are removed, emphasis is to be placed on preservation of the exist- replacement shall be as follows: Six (6) to ten(10) inch ing landscape pattern. The Landscape Guidelines caliper - replace with two (2) thirty-six (36) inch box establish the design character and visual qualities for trees. Trees larger than ten (10) inch caliper, as mea- individual development in the project area. sured at the breast height (4' -6' above grade), shall be replaced with a single larger specimen tree, one (1) The Landscape Guidelines provide uniformity to the forty-eight (48) inch box and larger. All tree replace- site and establish a "Sense of Place" with both func- ment shall be subject to review and approval and may tional and aesthetic considerations. The Guideline pro- be modified by the Director of Public Works (Exhibit poses a continuation of the landscape and streetscape 32). patterns currently surrounding the aerospace facility. These elements include intensified perimeter land- scaping, large greenbelt areas, and pedestrian walk- 5.3.3 Landscape design shall provide informal groupings of ways which unify the project area.. The landscape deciduous and evergreen shade trees, flowering shrub- treatment for buildings and public right-of-ways should bery, and ground cover. Trees shall be of even size be designed with an internally consistent pattern and and shape at time of installation. Replacement trees comply with the following landscape policies. shall be mature accent trees and compatible with the surrounding existing trees. A minimum of ten (10) per- 5.3.0 POLICIES: cent of the net site area shall be landscaped. A maxi- mum of five (5) percent of the landscape area may be 5.3.1 Site layout shall respect and preserve the natural and improved with hardscape ( entries, plazas, and walk- existing site features, including trees and berming. A ways). professional consulting arborist shall be used to deter- mine how existing trees can be saved during design and construction (Exhibit 32). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 63 k Property line I Typical required screen hedge Interior Street 36" Max. — - - - ■ 6' walk 2' 10' 2' Overhang Typical Parkway Landscaping Landscape Detail Exhibit 33 64 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.3.4 Plant materials shall be selected to create an informal 5.3.6 Pedestrian walkway systems shall be designed to pattern of landscaping to reinforce the character of`the unify the entire project area and provide pedestrian site existing tree plantings. A more formal pattern of land- access to buildings, parking and site activity areas. scaping shall be created on-site at the project entries. Pedestrian walkways shall be a minimum of six (6) feet Trees shall be selected based upon the size of the in width. planting area, to allow for mature growth without caus- ing future damage to the improvements. Pedestrian walkways shall exist on each parcel and within the adjacent public right-of-way. All landscaping All trees shall be a minimum twenty-four (24) inch box adjacent to the pedestrian walkway improvements shall size. Shrubbery (evergreen and flowering) shall be low be installed concurrent with each individual project and to medium in height grouped in informal masses, mini- consistent with the Landscape Concept ( Exhibit 33). mum size shall be five (5) gallon. All grass selections shall be made from the approved water efficient mate- 5.3.7 Perimeter landscaping around the project areas shall rials list (Exhibit 38). provide a consistent edge treatment using a limited number of plant materials, and shall meander in infor- 5.3.5 The right-of-way area, shall provide a six (6) foot wide mal groupings around the site. An area shall be pre- sidewalk, adjacent to the curb with a two (2) foot wide served for a six (6) foot wide sidewalk along this landscape strip between the property line and back of perimeter edge within the public right-of-way and shall sidewalk. The landscape strip shall be adjacent to the be consistent with the edge treatment on all perimeter individual projects landscaping and compatible to blend streets (Exhibit 33). in with the on-site perimeter planting palette. Tree planting in these parkway areas shall include a minimum of one (1) twenty-four (24) inch box tree for each twenty (20).feet of lineal frontage. Tree planting may include a .combination with thirty-six (36) inch or larger box trees. Tree planting shall be grouped in informal drifts and tree quantities shall be determined by the length of the property adjacent to the street divided by the recommended spacing of each tree vari- ety. All parkway planting shall be subject to review and approval of the Director Of Public Works (Exhibit 33). McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 65 I . i I i I I I I I I I UU 0 0 0 i 5' Minimum on Sidewalk inside of curb connection /\\,I v 6 Parking Stalls to street Required Islands with trees I Typ' 17' Typical required I screen hedge 2 Overhang b Property Line Street Exhibit 34 Typical Parking Lot Landscaping 66 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5 5.3.8 Parking lots shall be planted at a rate of one (1) tree Where cars overhang the curbs, ground cover planting for every six (6) parking stalls. Parking areas imm.edi- shall be required at a minimum width of three (3) feet ately adjacent to public streets shall provide one (1) (inside dimension). The overhang area shall not be tree in a landscape area between each sixth parking considered as part of the required minimum percent- stall. Parking lot trees shall be twenty-four (24) inch age of on-site landscaping (Exhibit 34). box trees. All tree planting areas shall be a minimum net width of five (5) feet ( Exhibit 34). 5.3.9 Interior property lines shall be planted with a contin- uous hedge, five (5) gallon shrubs at a minimum spac- Parking lot treatments shall be consistent and con- ing and twenty-four (24) inch box trees; a minimum of tribute to the project landscaping unity. Parking lots one tree per twenty-five (25) lineal foot of property line. shall be planted with trees in such a manner as to pro- vide maximum shade. An alternative which clusters or groups parking lot trees adjacent to the building may be considered. Larger trees may also be substituted for a number of smaller trees, subject to review and -.,.... ---- ...x approval of the Director of Public Works. Perimeter parking lots adjacent to arterial streets, shall be provided with additional landscape treatment to ensure that the parking areas are adequately screened y; ' from adjacent street views. Berming in these areas is encouraged and shall be a maximum of three (3) feet , high and have a natural appearance in form. Shrubbery shall be planted in areas where berms are not practical, along the perimeter of the parking areas. -- Shrub planting shall be provided in a minimum five (5) gallon size and spaced a maximum of three (3) feet u apart. Shrubbery shall not exceed three (3) feet in height. Hedges shall be trimmed uthe g g p from ground and maintain an eight (8) inch ran le c a ce from the ground. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 67 Existing Trees -- Existing walk may be relocated/removed r; Screen hedge r_ Entry Drive \ Existing trees to remain / Existing walkway �\ `/' � \ , Parking in this area \ / (may be relocated or removed) between existing trees\. /' Screen hedge - \, Screen hedge 00 l Private Drive Preservation of Existing Landscaping Landscape Detail Exhibit 35 68 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.3.10 Entry drives shall be constructed in conformance with the Specific Plan (Policy 5.1.7) and City design stan- dards (Public Works Standard Plans), subject to the review by the Director of Public Works. Project access points shall be designed to provide entering and exiting drives with adequate views of approaching pedestrians and vehicles (Exhibit 23). - �5 Entry drives shall provide convenient access to parking lots at various site locations. In addition to street trees and on-site landscaping, each entry shall be designat- ed by ground cover and one or two large thirty-six (36) inch box specimen trees, on both sides of the entry. These trees shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet ; �R back from the face of the street curb to avoid the line- of-sight concern (Exhibit 35). Stamped concrete, colored to match paving materials, shall be provided at all driveway entrances and all pedestrian connections from the main building to the �,�� ' public pedestrian walkway system, across drive aisles and through landscaping. �b 5.3.11 Ent plaza areacourtyards ^/ :•.w, , Entry p sand shall be provided nYb`�Y as focal points and for employee use. These areasLVAI shall be an integral part of the building architecture and '. be connected by a walkway system to the public pedestrian walkways. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 69 f 5.3.12 Landscape buffer areas shall be provided along the of fifty (50) feet in width and shall include landscaping abutting edges between Planning Areas, concurrent and berming to adequately screen adjacent uses, con- with new development. These buffer areas are intend- sistent with the established landscape theme. The ed to provide for an aesthetic transition between the buffer areas may include walls, fencing, utility ease- aerospace facility and any non aerospace new devel- ments and pedestrian walkways compatible with adja- opment. Landscape buffer areas shall be a minimum cent development. Property line I Parking lot trees Walk ■�6' Minimum t screen wall N/ McDonne area a passion --------------------------------------- 51 Planted 50' Minimum landscape buffer Parking lot as separation buffer edge Typical Landscape/Parking Lot Buffer Landscape Detail Exhibit 36 70 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Landscape buffer areas may also be used for a private access drive and/or parking lot provided an intensified landscape design is proposed. An additional building setback may also be necessary in order to adequately screen the adjacent use. Property line Required property line Double row of trees screen trees with walk and hedges Private \` Parking lot trees \ development e a• ae •• e• • 9t Optional O® -- - screen wall 50' Minimum 15' Minimum McDonnell Expansion landscape landscaped buffer setback Typical Landscape Buffer Landscape Detail Exhibit 37 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 71 PLANT PALETTE j Street Trees Tall Screen Hedges (5 gal min) 1. Pinus Halepensis @ 35' oc. 1. Ligustram Texanum @ 30" oc. Canariensis @ 20' oc. 2. Nerium Oleander @ 36" oc. Eldarica @ 20' oc. 3. Xylosma Senticosa @ 36" oc. 2. Liquidambar Styraciflua 'Palo Alto' @ 25' oc. 4. Leptospermum Scoparium @ 36' oc. 3. Podocarpus Gracilior @ 30' oc. 5. Prunus Caroliana @ 36" oc. 4. Eucalyptus Citriodora @ 20' oc. Camaldulensis @ 20' oc. Low Screen Hedges (5 gal min) Maculata @ 20' oc. 1. Carissa Grandiflora @ 36" oc. Ficifolia @ 20' oc. 2. Nerium Oleander Petite Pink @ 36" oc. 5. Agonis Flexvosa @ 20' oc. 3. Juniperus Tamarisifolia @ 36" oc. 6. Cinnamomum Camphora @ 20' oc. Ground Cover Accent Trees 1. Mesembryanthemum Rosea 1. Lagerstroemia Faurei 2. Gazania Mitsuma 2. Prunus Cerasifera 'Thundercloud' 3. Grass Festoca/Marathon II or III 3. Eucalyptus, species 4. Erythrina Caffra Coralloides 5. Brachychiton Acerifolius Property Line Trees 1. Eucalyptus Ficifolia Nicholi 2. Podocarpus Gracilior 3. Agonis Flexuosa Plant Materials Palette Exhibit 38 72 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.3.13 Landscape screening is intended to soften and blend 5.3.15 Conservation water measures shall be incorporated in the connection of the developed building areas with the the landscape design. A minimum of seventy-five (75) landscape of the surrounding sites. This connection percent of the required landscape area shall be plant- shall be made with compatible ground cover, shrubbery ed with ground cover and the balance with turf. The and trees. Trees shall be provided to soften, and visu- use of shrubs, hedges, and berming, shall be provided ally relieve, building elevations and to provide summer to screen cars in the parking lots from street view. shade. Trash enclosure areas shall be provided with tree and shrub planting screens to soften the enclosure. Mechanical equipment and transformer areas shall have landscape screening and/ors low-level screen walls. Valves, meters, back flow preventers, etc., shall also be screened by shrub plantings and/or low level screen walls. 5.3.14 Landscape lighting shall be provided to aesthetically enhance the site, as well as providing for the safety and security of motorists and pedestrians throughout the project area. Pedestrian walkways shall include adequate night light- ing for public safety. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 73 J�"` rA NOR- r�. ��, '•i�i���.%� �;��, i, i't�1ii l/•///�"/ •� i;ram �'� mom moms P, sun OR% mom a OP&4 IW F, MINIMUM. 0000mmmxm o9 m 0 0 a 0 0 m :AJ 5.4 SIGNAGE GUIDELINES The Signage Guidelines identify a framework in which 5.4.3 Wall signs shall only be located on the building face advertising a place of business, providing directions or adjacent to a street and shall be limited to identify ten- information can be accomplished without detracting from ants within each building. These signs shall be restrict- the overall design quality of the project area. The ed to the name of the firm, company or corporation only. Signage Guidelines also contribute to the overall project The colors and materials of the sign structure shall be area design theme. Design, color, materials and place- compatible with the building architectural colors and ment are all important in creating signs that are architec- materials, sign face materials and colors may contrast. turally attractive and integrated into the overall project area design. The intent is to create and promote a qual- 5.4.4 Wall signs shall not exceed an area equal to one square ity visual environment by allowing only signs which are foot for each lineal foot of building frontage. Maximum compatible with their surroundings and which effectively size sign for each building facade adjacent to a street communicate their message. shall be one-hundred (100) square feet for industrial pro- , jects, two-hundred (200) square feet for commercial pro- This section sets forth general criteria for all signs within jects. Maximum letter height shall be thirty (30) inches. the project area. Signs shall be designed to be architec- tually compatible with the colors and materials of the 5.4.5 Wall signs shall be limited to one (1) sign per building adjacent building. All signing shall be subject to the pro- elevation with a maximum of two (2) wall signs per pri- visions and procedures of the Huntington Beach Zoning mary tenant on non-adjacent building facades. These and Subdivision Ordinance, and comply with the follow- signs shall be internally illuminated or non-illuminated. ing policies. Wall Sign Chart 5.4.0 POLICIES: Maximum Maximum Other 5.4.1 Wall signs and logos attached to the building shall be Number Area individual letters and surface mounted. No signs shall be painted directly on the building. No signs shall be boxed Commercial 1/Business 200 sq. ft • Below roof line with internal lighting and attached to a building. Industrial 1/Business/ 100 sq. ft. - Channel letters only 5.4.2 Wall signs shall be located on the building for optimum street frontage visibility from the adjacent street. Office 1/Business 100 sq. ft. • Raceways not Permitted Exhibit 40 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 75 Wall Sign Location a) Building Plan View P 2 Street Street Street Sign location not permitted Sign location permitted Sign location permitted X Y WALL SIGN """""" 7M Dimensions of X and Y varies. Wa I I Sign Detail X times Y is not greater than 100 sq.ft. for industrial projects and 200 sq.ft. for Exhibit 41 commercial projects. 76 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan i 5.4.6 Wall signs shall be limited for secondary tenants to a 5.4.8 Freestanding signs for business identification shall be maximum of one (1) sign per tenant. In no event shall limited to perimeter locations adjacent to existing arte- there be more than four(4) secondary tenant wall signs rials and shall be of a monument design. These signs permitted per building and no more than two (2) per shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height, as measured building elevation. from the adjacent grade, and not more than fifty (50) square feet in area for industrial and office and one 5.4.7 Additional wall signs shall be permitted at the prima- hundred (100) square feet for commercial. ry entry to a building. Maximum size shall be ten (10) square feet with the maximum letter height of twelve 5.4.9 Freestanding signs for tenant Identification may be (12) inches. installed within or adjacent to a private entry driveway. Entry signs must be located and sized so as to not interfere with vehicular visibility and/or movement. Entry signs shall be limited to thirty-two (32) square feet and shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. Entry signs may be placed on a berm not exceeding eighteen (18) inches in height. Entry signs shall include the -- — building address. X Freestanding Sign Chart yr WALL SIGN Maximum Maximum Maximum Other Number Area Height l � Commercial 1/250' of 100 sq.ft. 7 ft. Multi-tenant frontage panels are permitted Industrial and 1/building 50 sq. ft.7ft. 7 ft. Multi-tenant Dimensions of X and Y varies. Office panels are X times Y is not greater than 10 sq.ft. not permitted Entry Wall Sign Note: Entry signs, information/directional signs and temporary signs are Exhibit 42 subject to separate regulations Exhibit 43 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 77 Maximum 7' vertical in height 0 Adjacent A grade A. Freestanding Sign Detail Exhibit 44 78 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.4.10 All freestanding signs shall be of a monument design, including: business identification, business directory, and information/directional identification. Street-side signs, at access driveways, shall be used to identify a building address/tenant, and to direct traffic to that building. Internal, on-site signs shall be utilized to provide information and direction to pedestrian and automobile traffic. Freestanding retail commercial signs shall be a minimum of two hundred and fifty (250) feet apart. 4' Maximum Height G d f JJJJ ��t 18" Maximum from ground line to top of berm Entry Sign Detail Exhibit 45 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 79 1 5.4.11 Business directly signs which are freestanding shall 5.4.13 Information/directional signs shall be used to pro- be located near the primary entry and access drive. vide direction to on-site automobile traffic or pedestri- These signs shall be limited to identifying the building ans and not visible from off-site areas. address and tenants, and shall be visible from the inter- Informational/directional signs shall be limited to six (6) section of a private driveway and a public street. square feet per face, double faced. This sign shall not These signs shall not be allowed elsewhere within the exceed three (3) feet in vertical height. { landscape setback area or along street frontages. 5.4.14 Informational/directional signs shall be limited to the 5.4.12 Business directory signs shall not exceed a maxi- identification of function and/or service and shall not mum area of twelve (12) square feet per face, may be contain the name of the business, company or corpo- double faced adjacent to a street front and single faced ration providing the function and/or service. When adjacent to a building, and shall not exceed three (3) appropriate, such signs shall contain a directional feet in vertical height. Signs shall be limited to one sign arrow and provide direction to functions and/or ser- per building. More than one building address and ten- vices or information such as Authorized Vehicles Only, ant may be identified on one sign. Signs shall be con- Handicapped Parking Only, and Loading Zone. sistent with the,overall building architecture. Maximum 3' vertical feet Maximum 3' vertical feet in height in height 4' Ground Line 2' L J_') ,Business Directory Sign Information/Directional Sign Exhibit 46 Exhibit 47 80 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 5.4.15 Temporary signs shall be allowed to provide informa- 5.4.17 Future tenant signs may be placed on vacant or tion and facilitate information during the construction developing property to advertise the future use of the and marketing. Such signs shall be limited to one per property and where this information may be obtained. lot, with a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet and Such signs shall be limited to one per street frontage seven (7) feet in overall height. and to a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet in area and seven (7) feet in overall height. These signs shall 5.4.16 Temporary directory signs shall be permitted on con- be placed no less than ten (10) feet from the property struction sites, and limited to one (1) for all contractors. line. Any such sign shall be removed upon occupancy The sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet, of the project. unless legally required by government contracts to be larger. The sign shall not exceed seven (7) feet in overall height and shall be located no less than ten (10) feet from any property line. These signs shall be removed upon completion of the project. 8' Maximum v 4' Maximum 7' Maximum Ground Line Temporary Sign Detail Exhibit 48 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 81 5.4.18 Centre identification signs may also be installed at key intersections, in landscaped areas within the right- of-way or landscaped street medians. Centre identifi- cation signs shall be limited to thirty-two (32) square feet and not exceed four (4) feet in vertical height, and only identify the overall business park. F 1 � � r , • i i Side Entry Sign Median Entry Sign Centre Identification Signs Sign Detail Exhibit 49 82 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan BoLSA _.�_ CH1CA___. DEVELOPMENT - — ±585, - .. ] C, 3 % FG LATION a TT'{�1�(}�ji :1�,t�M� �[�'t 4�.' Y Y•+ ..� '1 `t � 4 )' �' Qi TSf }'k�y+ Y - Sj/ .1~ _ ml M r Y ,� 3CY 2T 19' 27 -s SO i33 r� b i a.Y 44 j � � ii� �' tt 233'. vs I-0 E 1 ,, rt �,� - (� z>a .y .v f. `il•'�,1 �•T~�Pllitl �+- I � ,.111111 I I l..l.l_i 11-1_I_LI_LLU L1.11i TTL -n rI"T ! 11111111 C 1�_1 �, TMTI—T m r _ s N Section Six McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 83 v 02 Planning Area 4 Subarea G �G �P Planning Planning or Area 3 Area 2 /\•� Subarea C Subarea M ��, �\ RAILROAD TRACK 06 • %.♦. 1 ubarea F Subarea H 1 Planning ! o SKYLAB ROAD WEST Area 1 1 SKYLAB ROAD m Subarea a Subarea I Subarea A A Subarea L m y U .op •-_•�-_��-~ Planning ._._._. Area 1 A Subarea E ;Subarea ] r • � _ � _ � _ • _ � ' Subarea K Subar,ma D � 1 F L BOLSA AVENUE y Planning m Area 5 3 Planning Areas and Subareas Map Exhibit 50 North 84 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan i DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 6.0 PURPOSE 6.1.0 POLICIES: The purpose of this section is to provide specific devel- 6.1.1 Not withstanding provisions to the contrary, all grading opment regulations and standards that will be applied to shall be approved by both the Director of Community individual development projects in each Planning Area of Development and Director of Public Works. the Specific Plan. Upon adoption by the City of Huntington Beach, the McDonnell Centre Business Park 6.1.2 All construction shall comply with all provisions of the Specific Plan will be the zoning document for the project current Uniform Building Code and as subsequently area. amended in the future and applicable sections of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.3 Construction may commence only after the Director of The provisions contained herein shall govern the design Community Development finds that the project is con- and development of the McDonnell Centre Business sistent with the regulations, and applicable policies and Park Specific Plan area. Standards and/or criteria for guidelines of the Specific Plan. development and activities not specifically addressed in this Specific Plan may require referral to the current pro- 6.1.4 All structures in existence at the time of adoption shall visions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision be deemed in conformance with the Specific Plan. All Ordinance and Municipal Code. existing buildings and facilities are deemed to be per- mitted and are in conformity with the Specific Plan. Whenever a use has not been specifically listed as being a permitted use in a particular Planning Area of the 6.1.5 Request for expansion and/or new construction of Specific Plan, it shall be the duty of the Director of aerospace buildings and facilities within Planning Area Community Development to determine if the use is con- 1 for aerospace related uses shall be compatible with sistent with the intent of this Specific Plan and compati- the existing uses and subject to the limited industrial ble with other permitted uses. In the case of any con- ("IL") & ("IL-H") provisions of the current Huntington flicting provisions the regulation and policies of the Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Specific Plan shall prevail. In addition, all projects must Municipal Code. This type of project shall not be sub- comply with the following policies. ject to the provisions of the Specific Plan.. 6.1.6 Expansion of the existing aerospace facility beyond Planning Area 1 into an adjacent Planning Area shall McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 85 be subject to both the current provisions of the City's and/or relief but do not serve as interior or exterior liv- Zoning and Subdivision ordinance and The McDonnell ing or working space. Centre Business Park Specific Plan. 6.2.4 Building height. The vertical dimension measured 6.2 DEFINITIONS from the top of the highest roofline to the finished pad elevation shown on the approved grading plan. For the purposes of the Specific Plan, words, phrases and terms shall have the meanings as defined below. 6.2.5 Building, main. A building in which the principal use Terms not specifically defined in the Specific Plan shall of the lot is conducted. have the same definition as used in the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance 6.2.6 Director. Director of Community Development for the at the time of Specific Plan adoption. City. When not inconsistent with the context,words used in 6.2.7 Entryway. The point of ingress and egress from a pub- the present tense include the future tense; words used lic or private street to the individual project. in the singular number include the plural number; and words of the masculine gender include the feminine 6.2.8 Final approval. Ten (10) days after approval by the and neuter gender. The word "shall" is always manda- discretionary body and no appeal of that decision has tory and the word "may" is permissive. been filed. 6.2.1 Accessory building. A detached building on the 6.2.9 Grade. The surface of the ground or pavement at a same site as a main building, the use of which is inci- stated location as it exists prior to disturbance in prepa- dental to that of the main building such as a storage ration for a project by this code, includes natural grade. shed, etc., and which is used exclusively by the occu- pants of the main building. 6.2.10 Gross floor area. The total area of each floor within the building exterior walls. 6.2.2 Antenna, satellite dish. An apparatus capable of receiving communications from a transmitter or trans- 6.2.11 Gross site area. The area computed within the lot mitter relay. lines of a parcel of land before public streets, ease- ments, or other areas, to be dedicated or reserved for 6.2.3 Architectural projections or ap.purtenances. public use, have been deducted. Features on buildings which provide visual variation 86 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 6.2.12 Landscaping. The planting and continued mainte- 6.2.20 Lot line, front. On an interior lot, the front lot line is the nance of.suitable plant materials, and which includes property line abutting the street. On a corner or an adequate irrigation system. reverse corner lot, the front lot line is the shorter prop- erty line abutting a street, except in those cases where 6.2.13 Line of sight. A visual path emanating from an aver- the subdivision or parcel map specified another line as age eye level adjudged to be five (5) feet above ground the front lot line. On a through lot, or a lot with three or level. more sides abutting a street, or a corner or a reverse corner lot with lot lines of equal length, the Director 6.2.14 Local street. A low-speed, low-volume thoroughfare shall determine which property line shall be the front lot used primarily for access to individual properties. line for the purposes of compliance with yard and set- back provisions of this division. On a private street or 6.2.15 Lot. Any numbered or lettered parcel shown on a easement, the front and/or exterior lot line shall be recorded tract map, a record of survey pursuant to an designed as the edge of the easement. approved division of land, or a parcel map. A lot includes any area of land under one ownership abut- 6.2.21 Lot line, interior. A lot line not abutting a street. ting upon at least one street, alley or recorded ease- ment. 6.2.22 Lot line, rear. A lot line not abutting a street which is opposite and most distant from the front lot line; in the 6.2.16 Lot area. See net site area. case of an irregularly shaped lot, the rear lot line shall be determined by the Director. A lot which is bounded 6.2.17 Lot depth. The average horizontal distance between on all sides by streets may have no rear lot lines. the front and rear property lines, measured in the mean direction of the side property lines. 6.2.23 Lot width. Lot width shall be calculated as indicated for the following types of lots: 6.2.18 Lot frontage. The linear length of a lot measured along the property line adjacent to a street or ease- (a) Rectangular lot shall be measured along a line ment. equidistant to and twenty (20) feet from the front prop- erty line. 6.2.19 Lot line. Any line bounding a lot. "Property line" means (b) Cul-de-sac and knuckle lots shall be measured the same as "lot line." twenty (20) feet from the front property line along a line perpendicular to the bisector of the front property line. (c) Cul-de-sac lots siding on another street, or similar properties, shall be measured along a line perpendicu- lar to the interior side property line and twenty (20) feet from the front property line. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 87 6.2.24 Net site area. The total horizontal area within the 6.2.31 Site. Any legally created parcel of land bounded by property lines of a parcel of land exclusive of all rights- property lines after dedication. of-way, easements or dedications which physically pro- hibit the surface use of that portion of the property for 6.2.32 Site coverage. The building area of all structures on a other than vehicular ingress and egress, and/or land- site, as measured from all exterior building surfaces. scaping. Architectural features such as bay windows, eaves and canopies that do not project more than thirty (30) inch- 6.2.25 Open space. Any part of a lot or parcel unobstructed es, and decks that do not exceed more than forty-two from the ground upward, excepting architectural fea- (42) inches in height are excluded. tures extending no more than thirty (30) inches from the structure. Driveways and other parking areas shall 6.2.33 Site plan. A plan prepared to scale, showing accurate not be considered open space.. and complete dimensions of all: buildings, structures, landscaping, parking, drive aisles, uses, etc. and the 6.2.26 Parking structure. A structure used for parking of exact manner of development proposed for a specific vehicles where parking spaces, turning radii and drive parcel of land. aisles are incorporated within the structure. 6.2.34 Story. That portion of a building included between the 6.2.27 Person. The word "person" includes association, com- surface of any floor and the surface of the floor next pany, firm, corporation, partnership, copartnership or above it or the finished under surface of the roof direct- joint venture. ly above. 6.2.28 Private street. A privately owned and maintained 6.2.35 Street. A public or approved private thoroughfare or roadway used to provide vehicle access to abutting road easement which affords the principal means of properties. access to abutting property. 6.2.29 Retail commercial use. Permitted uses within this 6.2.36 Structure. Any building or portion thereof, wall, fence, designation include restaurants, hotels, entertainment etc., extending forty-two (42) inches in height above and general merchandise establishments. the grade. 6.2.30 Setback line. The line which defines the width or 6.2.37 Structural alteration. Any change in, or alterations to, depth of the required yard. Such line shall be parallel the structure of a building involving: the bearing wall, to the property line and removed therefrom by the per- column, beam or ceiling joints, roof rafters, roof pendicular distance described as the setback. diaphragms, foundations, retaining walls or similar components. 88 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 6.2.38 Ultimate right-of-way. The adopted maximum width 6.2.43 Yard, rear. A yard extending across the full width of for any street, alley or thoroughfare as established by: the lot between the side lot lines and measured the general plan, a precise plan of street, alley or pri- between the rear lot line and the nearest rear line of the vate street alignment, a recorded parcel map, or a main building or the nearest line of any enclosed or standard plan of the department of Public Works. Such covered porch. thoroughfares shall include any adjacent public ease- ment used as a walkway and/or utility easement. 6.2.44 Yard, side. A yard extending from the front yard to the rear yard between the side property line and the near- 6.2.39 Use. The purpose for which land or building is est line of the main building or any accessory building. arranged, designed, or intended, or for which it is occu- pied or maintained. 6.2.45 Zone. A district as defined in the state Conservation and Planning Act, shown on the official zoning maps 6.2.40 Wall or fence. Any structure or devise forming a phys- and to which uniform regulations apply. ical barrier. This definition shall include: wood, con- crete, concrete block, brick, stone or other masonry 6.2.46 Zoning maps. the official zoning maps of the City of material. Huntington Beach which are a part of the comprehen- - sive zoning ordinance. 6.2.41 Yard. An open, unoccupied space on a lot on which a building is situated and, except where provided in the ordinance code, is completely unobstructed from the ground to the sky. 6.2.42 Yard, front. A yard extending across the full width of the lot between the side lot lines and between the front lot line and either the nearest line of the main building or the nearest line of any enclosed or covered porch. The front lot line shall be deemed to be the existing nearest right-of-way line of the abutting street, road or highway, unless a different right-of-way line for future use shall have been precisely fixed by formal action of the City Council pursuant to law or ordinance. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 89 Permitted Uses PI nning Area 1 1 1a 1 2 1 3 4 5 <iS2+ :.4v• vgkvy.,J1YY�P�:•i:f h::y Y2»v 1v� \<"�Ek>::k•'kiv C .'sv':.5:\:;2....,....:..,. ��2;§�...k,•:Y2 kE...R.. ,Y;.+.R.2ar.•:R,{,t,)}kk: rixttki :'ri££ai k;Yt• INDUSTRIAL MDA Aerospace, including all existing 10 buildings and facilities as well as expansion of similar facilities under the existing development standards. Such uses may include tank fabrication and assembly ��` •'�--�•� � operation, heavy welding,insulation, Planning ��. Area 4 Subarea G and thermal protective coatings. Manufacturing Planning Planning Warehousing i'� �' ��;�'~ti;- Area 3 Area 2 �• i• �y /> ,i'-. Subarea C Light Industrial • .' ``/ Research and Development ;�,� Subarea M .. - FAKROAO TRAtK 22Y�:4 Y ♦• S s++2 1:£kik$:�r:2. \t,*tYtEik,\}. ..2.;s Yk$i:YSY L'.'•RY2k'tA. +..'•�.. Sa.Y 1 &T_ .1 COMMERCIAL Subarea H 1 ubarea F Banks and other+Financial Institutions+ Planning1� ti 1 1 Commercial Recreation and Entertainment y sK-AaosT Area 1 1•sKvcAeROAo Communication Facilities • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SubareaI 1 Eating &DrinkingEstablishments subarea a subarea L Subarea A A Hotels, Motels and Ancillary Retail Uses 0 40 Planning Retail Sales � � � �• A Maintenance& Repair Services O • • • • rea 1ASubarea E iSubarea Jr 1 1 Warehouse&Sales outlets 41 1 > i Subarea K i Sub a }U t D ii42Y tiYCv%::'C'2s . OFFICE _.—.— -- Planning l Research &Development Services Area 5 Laboratories +,f:,,@+... ...Y;.'•3jv'..,..x3--+.. ...£,a ..Rtt• <%ini t£�,+.u•.C <;>4: PUBLIC AND SEMIPUBLIC Conference Facilities Day Care, General Governmental Facilities Heliports Maintenance and Service Facilities Public Utilities and Facilities Exhibit 51 I 90 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan A 6.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Development Standards shall serve as the mecha- Parking structures may be constructed in each Planning nism for the implementation of the McDonnell Centre Area and subject to all the development regulations of Business Park land uses. The standards set forth in this the Planning Area with the exception of maximum floor section will assure that future development within the area ration and maximum site coverage. No maximum Centre is implemented in a manner consistent with the shall be established for these provisions. intent of the project area Master Plan. The standards contained herein provide flexible mechanisms to antici- 6.3.2 Maximum building height. The maximum allowable pate future needs and achieve compatibility between building height shall be established in each Planning land uses and the surrounding community. Standards Area. An additional ten (10) feet in height will be allowed and guidelines are designed to be compatible with the for roofline treatment, architectural features and special existing land use categories of the City. The primary land equipment or mechanical devices. Building height may uses in the McDonnell Centre Business Park shall be also be increased by fourteen (14) feet to allow roof top industrial and research and development. Commercial, mechanical, multi story buildings, (three (3) or more) may office, public and semi-public uses are secondary and request up to twenty (20) percent of the building height may be permitted in certain Planning Areas. for mechanical equipment housing. Development Standards shall be established for each Planning Area in order to accommodate a variety of 6.3.3 Intensity. Maximum intensity shall be established in alternative uses in each area. each Planning Area. The overall intensity for the Specific Plan area has been established by the City's 6.3.1 Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be established in General Plan with a floor area ratio (F.A.R. of .75.) The each Planning Area and shall be required to meet all maximum F.A.R. for each Planning Area varies to applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance accommodate the anticipated uses. Code. All structures incidental and accessory to a permitted principal use or structure, may be erected on any parcel containing a main building provided that such structures conform with all requirements of the Specific Plan. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 91 Development Regulations Chart 1 1 1A 2 3 4 5 L M K A C D G H I B E F J Maximum Intensity F.A.R. 0.75 0.75 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Minimum Lot Size (AC) NA 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Minimum Lot Frontage 100' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' 250' Maximum Bldg. Height 250' 50' 50' 50' 50' 50' 50' 40' 40' 00' 50' 175' 75' 75' Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% Minimum Setback Front 20' 25' 35' 35' 35' 35' 35' 25' 25' 25' 35' 35' 35' 35' Interior Side 15' 10' 15' 10' 15' 15' 10' 10' 15' 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' Exterior Side 10' 15' 25' 15' 25' 25' 15' 15' 25' 25' 15' 15' 15' 15' Rear 10' 15' 10' 151* 151* 10' 10' 15' 15' 10' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Landscape 8% 100/6 10% 15% 10% 10% 15% 10% 10% 10% 15% 15% 15% 1 15% Minimum Perimeter Landscape Front 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 10' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' Interior Side 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Exterior Side 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Interior Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' Exterior Side 10' 1 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' loll 10' 10' Adjacent to Arterial Hwy. NA I NA 24' 24' NA 24' 24' NA NA 24' 24' 24' 24' " Minimum rear setback 50' when adjacent to residential areas. .� Planning 341 -\♦,� Exhibit 52 Area 4 Subarea c'�� �. ; `♦ ;�, Planning Planning �' ♦y'\�` Area 3 Area 2 �• ♦ `♦ Subarea C Subarea M 1. . ubarea F Subarea H—� 1 ` Planning P 11 ___ __ _____Area_1 __ ._. .• . .a a _ •1 Subarea B Subarea! Subarea L 1 Subarea A _ • �•�•�•-•r• Planning •_•- Planning 7A �. _ _.- Subarea E iSubarea J 1 � Subarea K 1 Sub a D 1 Planning 92 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Area 5 6.3.4 Parking. All developments will be required to meet the minimum on-site parking standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, the following may apply: • Standard parking stall size shall be nine (9) feet wide Parking Standards by nineteen (19) feet deep and may be reduced to Use . Required Parking provide a wheel stop at seventeen (17) feet with a two (2) foot overhang to expand the landscaping. Office 1 sp./250 s.f. This additional landscape area will not be credited Administrative toward the required landscape percentage. Research and Development • A compact parking stall size of eight feet zero inches Industrial and Manufacturing 1 sp./500 s.f. (8'-0") wide by seventeen (17) feet deep may be pro- posed for employee parking areas, up to a maximum Warehouse and Distribution 1 sp./500 s.f. of twenty five (25) percent of the total required park- (for the first 20,000 s.f.) ing spaces. 1 sp./5,000 s.f. • Total parking required by the Huntington Beach (for over 20,000 s.f.) Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance may be installed Hotel/Motel .75 sp./room in phases, as needed, provided sufficient parking for plus 2 sp./Manager employee projections can be met. The initial phase of required parking shall be a minimum of fifty (50) Restaurant 1 sp./100 s.f. percent of the required parking. A covenant shall be recorded on the property prior to occupancy to insure Retail 1 sp./200 s.f. provision of all parking as necessary. Shared parking may be permitted for combined office Exhibit 53 and commercial uses. A shared parking program may allow for a reduction of code required parking by up to twenty five (25) percent, based upon a shared parking analysis. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 93 • Shared off-site parking facilities may also be permit- 6.3.8 Fencing. Walls and fences are encouraged as ted for adjacent office and industrial uses. means of providing security and screening. Walls shall be constructed of masonary or concrete materials con- • Handicap accessible parking spaces shall be.provid- sistent with, and complimentary to, building architec- ed as required by the California Building Code. ture. Fencing shall be restricted to ornamental iron; chain-link fencing shall not be used. • All areas set aside for future parking facilities shall be landscaped consistent with other on-site landscaping and may not be used for building development or expansion. • Any existing aerospace required surface parking as described in the Specific Plan parking requirements, removed for new development shall ber replaced on a one for one basis concurrent with new,development. 6.3.5 Landscaping. In addition to the Landscape Guidelines contained in the Specific Plan and City Standard Landscape Plans: all setback and parking lot areas fronting on, or visible from, adjacent public streets shall be landscaped and permanently main- tained in an attractive manner. 6.3.6 Signs. All signs in the project area shall conform to the provisions of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and shall be consistent with the guidelines of the Specific plan. 6.3.7 Lighting. All illumination of streets, parking areas, and project sites, shall be coordinated to provide a con- sistent illumination intensity. Emphasis shall be placed on areas of high vehicular and pedestrian activity. Light fixtures and standards shall be consistent with building architectural style. 94 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Development Regulations Check List Required/ Request Comments Allowed Use Intensity (F.A.R.) Lot Size (AC) Lot Frontage Building Height Lot Coverage Setback Front Interior Side Exterior Side Rear Landscape Perimeter Landscape Front Interior Side Exterior Side Interior Rear Exterior Side Arterial Highway Exhibit 54 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 95 Design Guidelines Policy Check List 5.1 Site Planning Guidelines Good Modify/ Redesign Comments Explain 5.1.1 Site Layout 5.1.2 Building Orientation 5.1.3 Parking Layout 5.1.4 Loading & Storage Layout 5.1.5 Site Access 5.1.6 On-Site Circulation 5.1.7 Entry Drive Design 5.1.8 Handicap Accessibility 5.1.9 Energy Conservation 5.1.10 Security Provisions 5.1.11 Relationship to Adj Sites Exhibit 55 96 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Design Guidelines Policy Check List 5.2 Architectural Guidelines Good Modify/ Redesign Comments Explain All Buildings 5.2.1 Building Location 5.2.2 Building Massing 5.2.3 Building Articulation 5.2.4 Building Relationships 5.2.5 Building Entries 5.2.6 Building Materials 5.2.7 Glazing 5.2.8 Equipment Screening 5.2.9 Exterior Lighting ' 5.2.10 Trash Enclosures Industrial Buildings 5.2.11 Building Design 5.2.12 Building Entries 5.2.13 Building Materials 5.2.14 Mechanical Equipment 5.2.15 Satellite Structures 5.2.16 Loading Areas 5.2.17 Outdoor Storage Commercial/Office Buildings 5.2.18 Building Design 5.2.19 Building Materials 5.2.20 Building Illumination Exhibit 55 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 97 �— Design Guidelines Policy Check List 5.3 Landscape Guidelines Good Modify/ Redesign Comments Explain 5.3.1 Site Layout 5.3.2 Existing Trees 5.3.3 Landscape Design 5.3.4 Plant Materials 5.3.5 Right-Of-Way Areas 5.3.6 Pedestrian Walkways 5.3.7 Perimeter Landscaping 5.3.8 Parking Lots 5.3.9 Interior Property Lines 5.3.10 Entry Drives 5.3.11 Entry Plazas 5.3.12 Buffer Areas 5.3.13 Screening 5.3.14 Lighting 5.3.15 Water Conservation Exhibit 55 98 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Design Guidelines Policy Check List 5.4 Signage Guidelines Good Modifyl Redesign Comments Explain 5.4.1 Wall Sign Design 5.4.2 Wall Sign Location 5.4.3 Wall Sign Materials 5.4.4 Wall Sign Size 5.4.5 Tenant Sign Location 5.4.6 Tenant Sign Quantity 5.4.7 Additional Wall Sign Design/Size 5.4.8 Free Standing Sign Design/Size 5.4.9 Entry Sign Design/Size 5.4.10 Entry Sign Content 5.4.11 Business Directory Sign Content 5.4.12 Business Directory Sign Design/Size 5.4.13 Information/Directional Sign Design/Size 5.4.14 Information/Directional Sign Content 5.4.15 Temporary Sign Design/Size 5.4.16 Temporary Directory Sign Design/Size 5.4.17 Future Tenant Sign Design/Size 5.4.18 Centre Identification Sign Design/Size i Exhibit 55 McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 99 APPENDICES K£a s y ` w now � � i McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK City of Huntington Beach SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 (VOLUME TWO) McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK City of Huntington Beach SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 APPENDICES (VOLUME TWO) { Prepared by EDAW, Inc. with Michael C. Adams Associates ardous materials. The following provides a brief dis- Ensure that development is adequately served by trans- cussion of these Elements which are applicable to the portation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public project including a listing of applicable goals and poli- services. cies. Although the General Plan identifies objectives Achieve and maintain a high quality of architecture, land- within each element, the policies actually implement scape, and public open spaces in the City. the objectives and therefore provide more specific cri- 0 Ensure that significant environmental habitats and teria of how the identified goals will be achieved. The resources are maintained. discussion below indicates how the Specific Plan pro- 0 Achieve a diversity of land uses that sustain the City's ject meets the applicable policies. economic viability, while maintaining the City's environ- mental resources and scale and character. 1. LAND USE ELEMENT 0Achieve a pattern of land uses that preserves, enhances, and establishes a distinct identity for the City's neighbor- The Land Use Element (LUE) for the City of Huntington Beach hoods, corridors, and centers. General Plan provides for the types, density/intensity, design, Achieve the development of industrial uses that provide and distribution of commercial, residential, industrial, and agri- job opportunities for existing and future residents, as well cultural land uses as well as public and private open space. The as the surrounding subregion, and generate revenue for LUE includes goals designed to serve as a general guide for the the City. future development of Huntington Beach in terms of location of uses, allowable residential densities, and other criteria. The following applicable Land Use Element policies are identi- fied below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how entre Business Park Specific Plan achieves D Mconne The LUE designates the 307-acre McDonnell Centre Business the F Park project site Industrial with an FAR of 0.75. Typical permit- consistency. ted uses of the Industrial designation are light manufacturing, research and development, warehousing, business parks and Correlation of Land Use Development with Market professional offices, supporting retail, financial, and restau- rants, and similar uses, or warehouse and sales outlets. Policies The primary goal of the Land Use Element is to provide guid- LU 1.1.1 ance regarding the manner in which lands are to be used in the Establish incentives for the development of uses to support the City of.Huntington Beach. Applicable goals include: needs and reflect the economic demands of City residents and visitors. • Achieve development that maintains or improves the City's fiscal viability and reflects economic demands The Specific Plan area will be incrementally developed in phas- while maintaining and improving the quality of life for the es over an extended period of time as outlined in Section 4.5 of current and future residents of Huntington Beach. the document. The project site has been divided into a number of Planning Areas, creating distinct subareas and allowing for Correlation of Land Use Development with Supporting private development to occur in a timely manner with an overall Public Infrastructure and Services Master Plan concept. This approach will ensure that future eco- nomic development opportunities will be implemented depen- Policies dent upon market conditions. Additionally, the Specific Plan LU 2.1.1 allows for flexibility in the Specific Plan Development Plan and construct public infrastructure and service improve- Regulations. This flexibility in development standards is intend- ments as demand necessitates to support the land uses speci- ed to accommodate future market trends and tenant needs, fied in the Land Use Plan (as defined in the Circulation and without sacrificing the intended high-quality character of the Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). project area. The Specific Plan area will be incrementally developed in phas- During the formulation of the Specific Plan, staff identified uses es over an extended period of time. The project site has been to be permitted and prohibited within the document. "Future per- divided into a number of Planning Areas, creating distinct sub- mitted uses" have the incentive of a "fast track" entitlement areas and allowing for private development to occur in a timely process since their approval shall be 'determined via the manner with an overall Master Plan concept. Director of Community Development vs. the Planning Commission or City Council. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to LU 1.1.2 serve the proposed project. A Circulation Plan and Public Promote development in accordance with the Economic Facilities Plan for water, wastewater and storm drainage have Development Element. been prepared for the project consistent with all standards and requirements of the applicable service agencies (refer to The Specific Plan will encourage future development by pro- Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of the Specific Plan). These plans will be moting a comprehensive planned Industrial Park and allowing approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing for future "fast-track" entitlement. This Specific Plan will pro- public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support mote development in accordance with the Economic the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Development Element. Additionally, the landowner is promoting development through its internal marketing strategies and real Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- estate brokers. lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures are provided as Appendix C. .ri LU 2.1.2 Quality of the City's Built Environment Require that the type, amount, and location of development be correlated with the provision of adequate supporting infrastruc- Policies ture and services (as defined in the Circulation and Public LU 4.1.1 Utilities and Service Elements). Require adherence to or consideration of the policies pre- scribed for Design and Development in this Plan, as appropri- Development will be correlated with infrastructure needs. ate. Section 4.0 of the Specific Plan presents the realistic develop- ment proposed for the planning areas and the circulation, pub- Design Guidelines and Development Regulations are included lic facilities and infrastructure plans which will support the Land as Sections 5.0 and 6.0 of the Specific Plan. Section 5.0 estab- Use Plan and reinforce the design concept. In addition, a devel- lishes a comprehensive set of design guidelines for the entire opment phasing plan has been prepared as Section 4.5 of the project area and for individual project development, while Specific Plan. The phasing plan identities the amount and tim- Section 6.0 presents a detailed description of the development ing of infrastructure required to support various phases of regulations and standards which are necessary to guide and development control new development and carry out the goals and policies of the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan.. LU 2.1.3 Limit the type, location, and/or timing of development where LU 4.1.2 there is inadequate public infrastructure and/or services to sup- Require that an appropriate landscape plan be submitted and port land use development. implemented for development projects subject to discretionary review. Development will be correlated with infrastructure needs. Section 4.0 of the Specific Plan presents the realistic develop- Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- ment proposed for the planning areas and the circulation, pub- mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall lic facilities and infrastructure plans which will support the Land Specific Plan standards are included as Sections 5.3 and 4.4 of Use Plan and reinforce the design concept. In addition, a devel- the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all opment phasing plan has been prepared as Section 4.5 of the development within the Specific Plan. Specific Plan. The phasing plan identifies the amount and tim- ing of infrastructure required to support various phases of LU 4.1.3 development. Require property owners to maintain landscaping, remove and abate weeds, and replace unhealthy or dead landscape. Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan standards are included as Sections 5.3 and 4.4 of the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- development within the Specific Plan. mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan standards are included as Section 5.3 of the LU 4.1.4 Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- Encourage developers to incorporate mature and specimen opment within the Specific Plan. trees and other significant vegetation, as defined by the City, that may exist on a site into the design of a development project The incorporation of adequate drought-conscious irrigation sys- for that site. tems and maintenance of the health of the landscape is also addressed in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan and will be Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- reviewed with the plans for development of individual parcels. mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan standards are included as Section 5.3 of the LU 4.1.7 Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- Require that all commercial and industrial landscape be ade- opment within the Specific Plan. The Landscape Plan (Section quately irrigated with automatic irrigation systems. 4.4) also requires incorporation of mature and specimen trees that may exist on a site into the design. Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan, standards are included as Section 5.3 of the LU 4.1.5 Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- Consider creating incentives for the use of drought-tolerant opment within the Specific Plan. species in landscape design. The incorporation of automatic irrigation systems is also Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- addressed in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan and will be mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall reviewed with the plans for development of individual parcels. Specific Plan standards are included as Section 5.3 of the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- LU 4.1.8 opment within the Specific Plan. Incentives for the use of Use reclaimed water for the irrigation of public and private land- drought-tolerant species in landscape design are also scape, as feasible. addressed in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan and will be reviewed with the plans for development of individual parcels. The City does not currently have a reclaimed water supply sys- tem available. As indicated in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan, LU 4.1.6 reclaimed water shall be utilized where and whenever feasible Require that commercial and industrial development incorpo- and shall comply with the City's "Water Efficient Landscape rate adequate drought-conscious irrigation systems and main- Requirements" (Ordinance #1452). Usage will be addressed tain the health of the landscape. with future individual requests for development if such a system is available at that time. I LU 4.2.1 Section 5.0 Design Guidelines and Section 6.0 Development Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with Regulations of the Specific Plan include requirements for park- the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes ing, access requirements, supporting functions, open space, and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and reno- etc. vated buildings. LU 4.2.5 Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- and use as required by State and Federal Laws such as the sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code Americans with Disabilities Act. (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, development regulations and standards that will be applied to standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they cations related to new, adaptively reused, and renovated build- currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 ings not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any individual development regulations and standards that will be applied to request. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- vidual request. Approp►iate design elements to facilitate access ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of and use shall be incorporated in accordance with State and future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures Federal Laws (refer to Section 5.0 Design Guidelines of the are provided as Appendix C. Specific Plan). LU 4.2.4 LU 4.2.6 Require that all development be designed to provide adequate Monitor the conditions of buildings in the City and enforce per- space'for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, tinent building, municipal and zoning codes to ensure their and other pertinent elements. maintenance and quality. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code The Floor Area Ratio of the Planning Areas within the Specific (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they Plan are at or below the 0.75 FAR. Overall, the maximum per- currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 mitted FAR is 0.67 based on 8,376,366 SF on 289 net acres. Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific development regulations and standards that will be applied to LU 7.1.5 the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to resources. the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- vidual request. The Specific Plan area will accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and Wipes and Densities of Land Use to be Permitted integrity of environmental resources. The proposed permitted land uses are consistent with the City's General Plan for the site Policies and the project site has been divided into a number of Planning LU 7.1.1 Areas, creating distinct subareas and allowing for private devel- Accommodate existing uses and new development in accor- opment to occur in a timely manner with an overall Master Plan dance with the Land Use and Density Schedules (Table LU-2 - concept. This approach will ensure that future economic devel- see below). opment opportunities will be implemented dependent upon mar- ket conditions. Additionally, the Specific Plan allows for flexibili- Table LU-2 ty in the Specific Plan Development Regulations. This flexibility Land Use Density and Intensity Schedule in development standards is intended to accommodate future market trends and tenant needs, without sacrificing the intend- COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ed high-quality character of the project area. Commercial and industrial intensities indicate the maxi- mum floor area ratio (FAR) which may be permitted on LU 7.1.6 a site. The actual development intensity may be Accommodate the development of additional jobs-generating reduced to account for site conditions and constraints. land uses that improve the 1992 jobs to housing ratio of 0.82 to FAR represents the total building area (floor space, 1.0 or greater; to meet objectives of the Regional excluding basements, balconies, and stair bulkheads) Comprehensive Plan (Southern California Association of on a lot divided by the total area of that lot. (Note: com- Governments) and Air Quality Management Plan. These should mercial FAR's exceeding 0.4 normally necessitate sub- capitalize upon existing industrial strengths and emphasizing terranean or subterranean parking to provide adequate the clustering of similar or complementary industries. space to meet code required parking). -F2A The Specific-Plan permits job-generating land uses that will Maximum floor area ratio of 0.75. assist in improving the 1992 jobs to housing ratio. Additionally, the Specific Plan area will be incrementally developed in phas- e. Improve industrial districts to accommodate the changing es over an extended period of time as outlined in Section 4.5 of characteristics and needs of manufacturing and other the document. The project site has been divided into a number industrial sectors. of Planning Areas, creating distinct subareas and allowing for private development to occur in a timely manner with an overall f. Intermix uses and densities in large-scale development pro- Master Plan concept. This approach will ensure that future eco- jects. nomic development opportunities will be implemented depen- dent upon market conditions. Additionally, the Specific Plan The Specific Plan area will accommodate the development of a allows for flexibility in the Specific Plan Development balance of land uses consistent with the patterns and distribu- Regulations. This flexibility in development standards is intend- tion of use and density depicted on the Land Use Plan Map. The ed to accommodate future market trends and tenant needs, proposed permitted land uses are consistent with the City's without sacrificing the intended high-quality character of the General Plan for the site and the project site has been divided project area. into a number of Planning Areas, creating distinct subareas and allowing for private development to occur in a timely manner Additionally, during the formulation of the Specific Plan, staff with an overall Master Plan concept. This approach will ensure identified uses to be permitted and prohibited within the docu- that future economic development opportunities will be imple- ment. "Future permitted uses" (which included mainly industrial mented dependent upon market conditions. Additionally, the and manufacturing uses) have the incentive of a "fast track" Specific Plan allows for flexibility in the Specific Plan entitlement process since their approval shall be determined via Development Regulations. This flexibility in development stan- the Director of Community Development vs. the Planning dards is intended to accommodate future market trends and Commission or City Council. tenant needs, without sacrificing the intended high-quality char- acter of the project area. Distribution and Pattern of Development Policies Industrial (1) LU 8.1.1 Accommodate land use development in accordance with the Permitted Uses patterns and distribution of use and density depicted on the Land Use Plan Map, and in accordance with the principles dis- Policies cussed below. LU 12.1.1 Accommodate the continuation of existing and development of a. Enhance a network of interrelated activity centers and corri- new manufacturing, research and development, professional dors by their distinct functional role, activity, and/or form and offices, supporting retail commercial (including, but not limited scale of development. to, sales areas for manufacturers and photocopy stores), restaurants, financial institutions, and similar uses in areas des- ignated on the Land Use Plan Map in accordance with Policy 7.1.1. in The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan develop- LU 12.1.3 ment concept outlined in Section 4.0 of the Specific Plan pro- Establish incentives for the inclusion of day-care, public meet- vides for a planned Industrial/Business Park complex in the ing rooms, and other community-oriented facilities in industrial northwestern portion of the City of Huntington Beach, consistent districts; possibly including the use of.bonus densities, expedit- with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General ed entitlements, or other techniques. Plan. Day-care, conference facilities and other public and semi-public The project site has been divided into a number of Planning uses are permitted(refer to Section 6.0 of the Specific Plan). As Areas, creating distinct subareas and allowing for private devel- stated previously, during the formulation of the Specific Plan, opment to occur in a timely manner with an overall Master Plan staff identified uses to be permitted and prohibited within the concept. This approach will ensure that future economic devel- document. "Future permitted uses"have the incentive of a "fast opment opportunities will be implemented dependent upon track" entitlement process since their approval shall be deter- market conditions. Additionally, the Specific Plan allows for flex- mined via the Director of Community Development vs. the ibility in the Specific Plan Development Regulations. This flexi- Planning Commission or City Council. bility in development standards is intended to accommodate future market trends and tenant needs, without sacrificing the Design and Development intended high-quality character of the project area. Policies During the formulation of the Specific Plan, staff also identified LU 12.1.4 uses to be permitted and prohibited within the document. Require that new and recycled industrial projects be designed "Future permitted uses"have the incentive of a "fast track"enti- and developed to achieve a high level of quality, distinctive tlement process since their approval shall be determined via the character, and be compatible with existing uses. Director of Community Development vs. the Planning Commission or City Council. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan provides j the framework and guidelines necessary to create a unique LU 12.1.2 high quality industrial, research and development business park Allow for the development of warehouse and sales outlets on complex. The Specific Plan is designed to allow for develop- industrial sites that are located on and front designated arterial ment in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding neigh- highways in proximity to arterial intersections provided that the borhood and City of Huntington Beach (refer to Sections 4.0 use will not adversely impact the economic integrity or cohe- and 5.0 of the Specific Plan). siveness of the industrial district in which it is located or sub- stantially reduce job opportunities for the City's residents. LU 12.1.5 Require that new and recycled industrial structures and sites be Section 4.0 of the Specific Plan permits these uses in a manner designed to convey visual interest and character and to be com- that is consistent with this policy. patible with adjacent uses, considering the: 14 a. use of multiple building masses and volumes to pro- d. use of consistent and well-designed public and infor- vide visual interest and minimize the visual sense of mation signage; and bulk and mass; e. installation of elements defining the key entry points b. architectural design treatment of all building eleva- and activity locations. tions; c. use of landscaping in open spaces and parking lots, Section 5.0 Design Guidelines and Section 6.0 Development including broad landscaped setbacks from principal Regulations of the Specific Plan address these issues. peripheral streets; Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report which ana- d. enclosure of storage areas with decorative screening lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific or walls; Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce aesthetic impacts e. location of site entries to minimize conflicts with adja- from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed cent residential neighborhoods; and mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C of the Specific f. mitigation of noise, odor, lighting, and other impacts. Plan. Section 5.0 Design Guidelines and Section 6.0 Development LU 12.1.7 Regulations of the Specific Plan address these issues. Control the development of industrial uses that use, store, pro- duce, or transport toxins, generate unacceptable levels of noise Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- or air pollution, or result in other impacts that may adversely lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific impact Huntington Beach. Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce noise, odor, light- ing and other impacts resulting from the buildout of future land Section 6.0 Development Regulations identifies allowable uses uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided and assists in the control of the development of certain industri- in Appendix C. al uses that may adversely impact Huntington Beach. Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report which ana- LU 12.1.6 lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Require that multiple tenant and large-scale sites developed for Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce environmental light industrial uses be designed with the following considera- impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing tions: of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C of the Specific Plan. a. siting of buildings around common pedestrian walk- ways and public places (plazas, outdoor dining, etc.); LU12.1.8 b. development of pedestrian walkways, arcades, Require that heavy industrial uses incorporate landscape set- and/or other visual elements to interconnect individ- backs, screening walls, berms, and/or other appropriate ele- ual buildings; ments that mitigate visual and operational impacts with adjacent C. use of common or compatible architectural design land uses. (materials, colors, design character, etc.); Sections 4.4 Landscape Plan, 5.0 Design Guidelines and 6.0 a. provide pedestrian connections and visual continuity Development Regulations of the Specific Plan address these between the node and surrounding neighborhoods; issues. Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report b. incorporate shade trees to shelter pedestrians; which analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce visual C. incorporate the use of enhanced paving materials at and operational impacts resulting from the buildout of future the pedestrian crosswalks; land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is pro- d. widen the sidewalks at intersections where feasible to vided as Appendix C of the Specific Plan. minimize the length of pedestrian crossings; and e. enhance the connections where feasible between the 2. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT public sidewalk and private commercial interior open spaces/courtyards as described in the Land Use The Urban Design Element focuses on the quality of the City's Element by using: physical and visual character, which is determined by the orga- • decorative paving materials; nization, scale, density and pattern of the community's built • landscape materials; and environment and open spaces. • street furniture f. incorporate landscaping to mask oil operations and The primary goal of the Urban Design Element is to establish major utilities, such as the Edison generating station. and strengthen community identity. An applicable goal includes: Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan standards are included as Sections 4.4 and 5.3 of The following applicable Urban Design Element policies are the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all identified below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of development within the Specific Plan. how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. UD 1.2.2 Require that the nodes incorporate the public improvements Nodes specified in UD 1.2.1 and other elements that may be listed in the table, as feasible. Policies UD 1.2 Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- Require public improvements to enhance the existing setting for mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall all key nodes and pedestrian areas through the consideration of Specific Plan standards are included as Section 4.4 and 5.3 of the following: the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all development within the Specific Plan. Corridor Identity racial and ethnic groups in Huntington Beach. Policies The provision of a variety of housing opportunities by UD 1.3.1 type, tenure, and cost for households of all .sizes Require a consistent design theme and/or landscape design throughout the City. character along the community's corridors, reflecting the unique qualities of each district. Ensure that streetscape standards for The development of a balanced residential environment the major commercial corridors, the residential corridors, and with access to employment opportunities, community primary and secondary image corridors provide each corridor facilities, and adequate services. with its own identity while promoting visual continuity through- out the City. These goals relate to issues which are not directly applicable to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, since the Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- Specific Plan is not designated for residential uses by the City mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall General Plan. The Housing Element objectives and policies are Specific Plan standards are included as Section 4.0 of the also not applicable. Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- opment within the Specific Plan. 4. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 3. HOUSING ELEMENT ELEMENT The Housing Element, adopted in July 1990, is intended to The overall intent of the City of Huntington Beach Historical and direct residential development and preservation in a way that Cultural Element is to identify the historical resources of the coincides with the overall economic and social values of the community, their current designations and community status, community. The Housing Element is an official municipal and the issues affecting their future. Goals include: response to a growing awareness of the need to provide hous- ing for all economic segments of the community, as well as legal To promote the preservation and restoration of the sites, requirements that housing policy be made a part of the planning structures and districts which have architectural, histori- process. As such, the Element establishes policies that will cal, and/or archaeological significance to the City of guide City officials in daily decision making and sets forth an Huntington Beach. action program designed to enable the City to realize its hous- Develop avenues for communication and participation in ing goals. The City of Huntington Beach has adopted three arts and cultural activities and programming to bring goals for its housing program which are consistent with State together diverse segments of the community. and Regional housing policies. These goals are: Highlight the City's unique cultural heritage and enhance its visual appeal. • The attainment of decent housing within a satisfying liv- Expand opportunities for the City's children to receive ing environment for households of all socioeconomic, quality experiences of arts and culture. ofA • Establish a wide range of arts and cultural programs and The following applicable Economic Development Element poli- facilities that address the needs and interest of residents, cies are identified below, followed in italic typeface by an expla- workers, and visitors. nation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. These goals relate to issues which are not directly applicable to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, since the Economic Growth Specific Plan area does not contain any significant historic and cultural resources. The Historic and Cultural Resources Policies Element objectives and policies are also not applicable. ED 1.1.1 Maintain and expand economic and business development pro- s. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT grams that encourage and stimulate business opportunities within the City. The Economic Development Element is specifically concerned with the identification of a strategy to address development The Specific Plan will stimulate business opportunities within potentials that will broaden and stabilize the City's economic the City by allowing for and encouraging development consis- base. Its goals and policies are formulated to provide new poli- tent with the Specific Plan under an expedited entitlement cy direction for the City and the planning area. process. The primary goal of the Economic Development Element is to Additionally, the Specific Plan provides for a range of employ- provide for the economic opportunities of City's residents; busi- ment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and indus- ness retention and expansion; and land use plan implementa- trial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening tion. Applicable goals include: the employee base of the community. Refer to Section 6.0 Development Standards for a list of permitted uses. • Provide economic opportunities for present and future Huntington Beach residents and businesses through Industrial Use employment and local fiscal stability. • Aggressively retain and enhance the existing commer- Policies cial, industrial and visitor serving uses while attracting ED 2.5.1 new uses to Huntington Beach. Encourage and assist existing and potential industrial owners to • Enhance Huntington Beach's economic development update, modernize, and expand their industrial properties. potential through strategic land use planning and sound urban design practices. The Specific Plan will encourage future industrial development by promoting a comprehensive planned Industrial Park and allowing for future "fast-track"entitlement. This Specific Plan will promote development in accordance with the Economic Development Element. Additionally, the landowner is promoting Element is to establish goals, policies and programs that will development through its internal marketing strategies and real promote growth and development based upon the City's ability estate brokers. to provide an adequate circulation system and public facilities and services. ED 2.5.2 Seek to capture "new growth" industries such as, but not limited The applicable goals of the Growth Management Element are to: to: • "knowledge" based industries, such as research and Reduce traffic congestion development firms (higher technology communications Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and information industries);communication industry ser- and public services are provided for existing and future vice providers and equipment manufactures which are residents of the City. creating the next series of consumer and utility company equipment and services; biotechnical industries;environ- The following applicable Growth Management Element policies mental technology; and point of sale industries. are identified below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan seeks to achieves consistency. capture "new growth"industries by allowing for and encouraging development consistent with the Specific Plan under an expe- Police dited entitlement process. Policies Additionally, the Specific Plan provides for a range of employ- 5.1.1 ment opportunities in the professional, retail, service and indus- Establish a 5 minute response time for priority 1 calls (where trial fields, thus stimulating business opportunities and widening there is a threat to life or property) for service 85% of the time. the employee base of the community. Refer to Section 6.0 Development Regulations for a list of permitted uses. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed 6. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the The Growth Management Element, adopted in April 1992, is a McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- pre-requisite to establish and continue eligibility to receive gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting monies generated by the sales tax which was approved by from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed Orange County voters in November 1990 as Measure M mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. (Revised Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance). The purpose and intent of the Growth Management 5.1.2 gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting Continue long range planning for police services to include from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed appropriate equipment, facilities, and staffing. mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Fire/Paramedic Services ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan 5.2.1 Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the Provide a 5 minute response time for emergency fire services McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- 80% of the time. gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan 5.1.3 Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the Establish response times for priority 2 (where a threat to life or McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- property is possible) and priority 3 (where there is no threat) gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting calls with concurrence of Chief of Police and City Council. from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the 5.2.2 proposed project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan Provide a 5 rrlinute response time for paramedic services 80% Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the of the time. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. proposed project. A Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park 5.1.4 Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public Ensure new developments meet security requirements. services impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Appendix C. ensure the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan 5.2.3 Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the Ensure new development includes fire prevention methods and McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- standards. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall ensure Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce circula- Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the tion impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A . McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting Appendix C. from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed 5.3.3 mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. Establish Level of Service "C" as the minimum acceptable stan- dard on the City's arterial streets. 5.2.4 Provide appropriate fire facilities, apparatus, equipment, and A Circulation Plan (refer to Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan) has staffing. been prepared for the project consistent with all standards and requirements of the applicable service agencies. This plan will The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall ensure be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing the provision of adequate public services to serve the proposed public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support project as specified in sections 4.3. A Master Plan the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes miti- Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which gation measures to reduce public services impacts resulting analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce circula- mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. tion impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Traffic/Circulation Appendix C. 5.3.1 5.3.4 Increase the City's involvement with contiguous and regional Establish Level of Service "D" as the minimum acceptable stan- agencies in circulation planning. dard on arterial intersections except those intersections includ- ed on the Deficient Intersection List established by Public A Circulation Plan (refer to Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan) has Works. been prepared for the project consistent with all standards and requirements of the applicable service agencies. This plan will A Circulation Plan (refer to Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan) has be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing been prepared for the project consistent with all standards and public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support requirements of the applicable service agencies. This plan will the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which 5.3.6 analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Promote traffic reduction strategies including alternate travel Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce circula- modes, alternate work hours, and decrease in number of vehi- tion impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. cle trips. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan indicates that alternative forms of transportation should also receive careful consideration. 5.3.5 Each future business developed within the Specific Plan will be Establish a plan to fund transportation improvements. required to address this issue. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which As indicated in the Specific Plan (Section 2.5), a Growth analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Management Plan (GMP) is required to implement the passage Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce circula- of Orange County Measure M approved in the 1990 election to tion impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A ensure that the planning, management and implementation of listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as traffic improvements and public facilities are adequate to meet Appendix C. current and projected needs. New developments in the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Development 5.3.7 will be correlated with infrastructure needs. Section 4.0 of the Participate in .Measure M sales tax revenue allocation program Specific Plan presents the realistic development proposed for for mitigation or construction of improvements to the existing cir- the planning areas and the circulation plans which will support culation. the Land Use Plan and reinforce the design concept. In addi- tion, a development phasing plan has been prepared as Section As indicated in the Specific Plan (Section 2.5), a Growth 4.5 of the Specific Plan. The phasing plan identities the amount Management Plan (GMP) is required to implement the passage and timing of infrastructure required to support various phases of Orange County Measure M approved in the 1990 election to of development ensure that the planning, management and implementation of traffic improvements and public facilities are adequate to meet Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which current and projected needs. New developments in the analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Development Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce circula- will be correlated with infrastructure needs. Section 4.0 of the tion impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A Specific Plan presents the realistic development proposed for listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as the planning areas and the circulation plans which will support Appendix C. the Land Use Plan and reinforce the design concept. In addi- tion, a development phasing plan has been prepared as Section 4.5 of the Specific Plan. The phasing plan identifies the amount and timing of infrastructure required to support various phases of development. A Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park proposes mitigation measures to reduce circulation impacts Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the to water service resulting from the buildout of future land uses. proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. Water 5.5.2 Policies Explore the economic and practical feasibility of using 5.5.1 reclaimed water. Provide water service to all areas with the following standards: The City does not currently have a reclaimed water supply sys- a. Water pressure be provided under average and peak tem available. As indicated in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan, hour demand conditions (minimum,50 psi, maximum reclaimed water shall be utilized where and whenever feasible 80 psi, average 60-65 psi no more than 5 psi fluctua- and shall comply with the City's "Water Efficient Landscape tion in a 24 hour period). Requirements" (Ordinance #1452). Usage will be addressed b. Provide fire flow capabilities that meet the Fire with future individual requests for development if such a system Department's requirements. is available at that time. c. Provide emergency water supply for a minimum of five days. Sewer d. Provide the best quality of water available at the mot reasonable cost. Policies e. Meet all requests for service in a timely manner. 5.6.1 Encourage completion of the Orange County Sanitation The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall District's Coast Trunk Sewer Line and Slater Pump Station. ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the posed by the Specific Plan. City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- posed by the Specific Plan. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to to sewer service resulting from the buildout of future land uses. Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the Appendix C. applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the 5.6.3 City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure Encourage new development to comply with Orange County as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- Sanitation District 3 and 11 requirements. posed by the Specific Plan. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- to storm drain system resulting from the buildout of future land ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the as Appendix C. City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- 5.7.2 posed by the Specific Plan. Encourage completion of the Santa Ana River Project and work with appropriate State, Federal, and local agencies to provide Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which 100-year flood protection of the Santa Ana River. analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall to sewer service resulting from the buildout of future land uses. ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to Appendix C. Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the Drainage applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure Policies as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- 5.7:1 posed by the Specific Plan. Provide the Local Storm Drain System to comply with 25 year storm standard. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce flooding impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing and at all intersections. of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix Develop a balanced and integrated multi-modal trans- C. portation system. Land Use Encourage and develop a transportation demand man- agement (TDM) system to assist in mitigating traffic Policies impacts and in maintaining a desired level of service on 5.8.1 the circulation system. Promote balanced growth of residential and non-residential Provide sufficient, well designed and convenient on and land uses and supporting public facilities and services. off street parking facilities throughout the City. The Specific Plan prepared for this project area promotes the The following applicable Circulation Element policies are identi- development of a comprehensive planned Industrial Park, con- fied below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how sistent with the City's land use designation. the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. 7. CIRCULATION ELEMENT Streets and Highways The purpose of the Circulation Element is to evaluate the trans- portation needs of the City and present a comprehensive trans- Policies portation plan to accommodate those needs. The Circulation CE 2.1.1 Element focuses on the City's arterial streets and highways; Maintain a city-wide level of service (LOS) not to exceed LOS public transportation modes and services; water transportation; "D" for intersections during the peak hours. and air transportation. The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall The primary goal of the Circulation Element is to provide a ensure the provision of adequate public facilities to serve the multi-mode transportation system that ensures the safe and effi- proposed project. A Circulation Plan (refer to Section 4.2 of the cient movement of people and goods. Applicable goals include: Specific Plan) for the project has been prepared to be consis- tent with the City of Huntington Beach's Circulation Element. • Provide a balanced transportation system that supports This plan will be approved by the City and the landowner will be the policies of the General Plan and facilitates the safe constructing public infrastructure as required by the City in and efficient movement of people and goods throughout order to support the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. the City while minimizing environmental impacts. • Provide a circulation system which supports existing, Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which approved and planned land uses throughout the City analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts related to LOS resulting from the buildout of future land uses. vehicular access to the project area, potential future access A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as may be available from the rail line on the northern boundary of Appendix C. the site. The Circulation Plan preserves access to this line for future options. CE 2.1.2 Maintain a city-wide level of service (LOS) for links not to CE 3.2.1 exceed LOS "C" for daily traffic with the exception of Pacific Require developers to include transit facilities, such as park-and Coast Highway south of Brookhurst Street. ride sites, bus benches, shelters, pads or turn-outs in their development plans, where feasible as specified in the City's The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall TDM Ordinance. ensure the provision of adequate public facilities to serve the proposed project. A Circulation Plan (refer to Section 4.2 of the The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance. Specific Plan) for the project has been prepared to be consis- As discussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan, all develop- tent with the City of Huntington Beach's Circulation Element. ments within this Specific Plan project will comply with City This plan will be approved by the City and the landowner will be requirements. constructing public infrastructure as required by the City in order to support the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Transportation Demand Management/Transportation Systems Management Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Policies Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts 4.1.1 related to LOS resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A Encourage non-residential development to provide employee listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as incentives for utilizing alternatives to the conventional automo- Appendix C. bile (i.e., carpools, vanpools, buses, bicycles and walking. Public Transportation Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan indicates that alternative forms of transportation should also receive careful consideration. Policies Each future business developed within the Specific Plan will be CE 3.1.1 required to address this issue. Encourage and support the various public transit agencies and companies, ride sharing programs, and other incentive pro- CE 4.1.5 grams, that allow residents to utilize forms of transportation Promote ride sharing through publicity and provision of infor- other than the private automobile. mation to the public. The project Circulation Plan identifies bus stop locations along Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan indicates that alternative forms the project frontage on Bolsa Avenue. As a supplement to of transportation should also receive careful consideration. Each future business developed within the Specific Plan will be related to parking facilities resulting from the buildout of future required to address this issue. land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is pro- vided as Appendix C. CE 4.1.6 Encourage that proposals for major new non-residential devel- CE 5.1.2 opments include submission of a TDM plan to the City. Provide safe and convenient parking that has minimal impacts of the natural environment, the community image, or quality of The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance. life. As discussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan, all develop- ments within this Specific Plan project will comply with City The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall requirements. ensure the provision of adequate supply of parking that sup- ports the present level of demand and allows for the expected Parking Facilities increase in private transportation use to serve the proposed project. Section 6.3 Development Standards of the Specific Policies Plan identifies specific requirements related to the provision of CE 5.1.1 parking. All developments will also be required to meet the min- Maintain an adequate supply of parking that supports the pre- imum on-site parking standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning sent level of demand and allows for the expected increase in and Subdivision .Ordinance. The plan will be approved by the private transportation use. City and the landowner will be constructing parking required by the City in order to support the land uses proposed by the The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Specific Plan. ensure the provision of adequate supply of parking that sup- ports the present level of demand and allows for the expected Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which increase in private transportation use to serve the proposed analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park project. Section 6.3 Development Standards of the Specific Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts Plan identifies specific requirements related to the provision of related to parking facilities resulting from the buildout of future parking. All developments will also be required to meet the min- land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is pro- imum on-site parking standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning vided as Appendix C. and Subdivision Ordinance. The plan will be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing parking required by Scenic Highways the City in order to support the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. Policies CE 7.1.1 Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which Require the roadways, as shown in Figure CE-12, to be analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park improved and maintained as local scenic highways, major Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts If A urban scenic highways, minor urban scenic highways, and land- scape corridors with key entry points. CE 7.1.7 Continue to construct landscaped medians in existing major Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- and primary arterial streets and continue to require the con- mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall struction of landscaped medians in new developments. Specific Plan standards are included as Section 4.4 of the Landscape standards which require implementation of the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- above policy are included as Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan. opment within the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all development within the Specific Plan. CE 7.1.4 Establish landscape and urban streetscape design themes for CE 7.3.1 landscape corridors, minor scenic urban corridors, and major Require that new development include landscaping that is com- urban scenic corridors which create a different character patible with the visual character of the designated scenic high- enhancing the corridor's surrounding land uses. For example, ways and corridors. the design theme for corridors adjacent to residential neighbor- hoods should be different than the design theme for industrial or Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- commercial uses. mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan. standards are included as Section 4.4 of the The Landscape Plan for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all devel- (Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared to estab- opment within the Specific Plan. lish the design character and visual qualities of the interior and perimeter of the project area. Treatments along individual prop- 8. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES erty lines shall be designed to provide security and privacy ELEMENT while providing visual compatibility. CE 7.1.5 The Public Facilities and Public Services Element discusses Require any bridges, culverts, drainage ditches, retaining walls public facility service provision for Huntington Beach residents and other ancillary roadway elements to be compatible and and businesses. The services discussed in this element architecturally consistent with surrounding development and include: law enforcement, fire protection, marine safety, educa- any other design guidelines. tion, libraries, and governmental administration. As described in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan, project area Applicable goals include: walls screening and fencing along the perimeter arterials shall Protect the community from criminal activity, reduce the provide project identity, privacy and noise control. Walls along individual property lines shall be designed to provide security incidence of crime and provide other necessary services within the City. and privacy while providing visual compatibility. • Ensure adequate protection from fire and medical emer- gencies for Huntington Beach residents and property 9. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES owners. ELEMENT • Promote a strong public school system which advocates quality education. Promote the maintenance and The Recreation and Community Services Element has been enhancement of the existing educational systems facili- adopted to identify, maintain and enhance local parks and recre- ties, and opportunities for students and residents of the ational services and facilities. City to enhance the quality of life for existing and future residents. Applicable goals include: The following applicable Public Facilities and Public Services Enrich the quality of life for all citizens of Huntington Element policies are identified below, followed in italic typeface ' by an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Beach by providing constructive and creative leisure opportunities. Specific Plan achieves consistency. • Provide adequately sized and located active and passive Police park lands to meet the recreational needs of existing and future residents, and to preserve natural resources with- The applicable Public Facilities and Public Services Element in the City of Huntington Beach and its sphere of influ- policies related to police have been identified within the Growth ence. Management Element discussion, followed in italic typeface by Develop park sites to provide diverse recreational and an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park sports facilities that meet the residents' and visitors' Specific Plan achieves consistency. Refer to the discussion of active and passive recreational needs. • Ensure recreation facilities are renovated and upgraded the Growth Management Element. to meet the current recreational interests of adults and Fire/Paramedic youth. • Provide parks and other open space areas that are effi- The applicable Public Facilities and Public Services Element ciently designed to maximize use while providing cost policies related to fire/paramedic have been identified within the efficient maintenance and operations. Growth Management Element discussion, followed in italic type- These goals relate to issues which are not directly applicable to face by an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, since the Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. Refer to the discus- Specific Plan is not designated for residential uses by the City sion of the Growth Management Element. General Plan. The Recreation and Community Services Element objectives and policies are also not applicable. 10. UTILITIES ELEMENT Water The Utilities Element discusses water supply, sanitation treat- The applicable Utilities Element policies related to water supply ment (wastewater), storm drainage, solid waste disposal, natur- and distribution facilities have been identified within the Growth al gas, electricity, and telecommunications. Management Element discussion, followed in italic typeface by Applicable goals include: an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park • Provide a water supply system which is able to meet the Specific Plan achieves consistency. Refer to the discussion of projected water demands; upgrade deficient systems the Growth Management Element and expand water treatment, supply, and distribution Wastewater Treatment and Facilities facilities; and pursue funding sources to reduce the costs of water provision in the City. The applicable Utilities Element policies related to wastewater • Provide a wastewater collection and treatment system treatment and facilities have been identified within the Growth which is able to support permitted- land uses; upgrade Management Element discussion, followed in italic typeface by existing deficient systems; and 'pursue funding sources an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park to reduce costs of wastewater service provision in the Specific Plan achieves consistency. Refer to the discussion of City. the Growth Management Element. • Provide a flood control system which is able to support the permitted land uses while preserving the public safe- ty; Drainage upgrade existing deficient systems; and pursue fund- ing sources to reduce the costs of flood control provision The applicable Utilities Element policies related to storm in the City. drainage and flood control facilities have been identified within • Maintain solid waste collection and disposal services in the Growth Management Element discussion, followed in italic accordance with the California Integrated Waste typeface by an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre Management Act of 1989 (AB939), and pursue funding Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. Refer to the sources to reduce the cost of the collection and disposal discussion of the Growth Management Element services in the City. • Maintain and expand service provision to City of Solid Waste Huntington Beach residences and businesses. Policies The following applicable Utilities Element policies are identified U 4.1.2 below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how the Maintain adequate solid waste collection for commercial, indus- McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves con- trial, and residential developments in accordance with state law. sistency. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, posed by the Specific Plan. standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 related to gas supply, telecommunication and electricity ser- Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific vices resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of development regulations and standards that will be applied to the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- 11. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/CONSER cations pertaining to solid waster collection, not addressed in VATION ELEMENT the Specific Plan, shall be subject to the City's adopted regula- tions in place at the time of any individual request. The Environmental Resources/Conservation Element address- es the City of Huntington Beach's environmental resources. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which Applicable goals include: analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce impacts Improve and enhance the overall aesthetic value and related to solid waste collection resulting from the buildout of appearance of the City of Huntington Beach through the future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures provision and maintenance of local public and private is provided as Appendix C. open space. • Protect and preserve significant .habitats of plant and Gas Supply. Telecommunication. Electricity wildlife species, including wetlands, for their intrinsic val- ues. Policies Conserve the natural environment and resources of the 5.1.1 community for the long-term benefit and enjoyment of its Continue to work with serviced providers to maintain current residents and visitors. levels of service and facilitate improved levels of service. The following applicable Environmental Resources and/or The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan shall Conservation Element policies are identified below, followed in ensure the provision of adequate public facilities and utilities to italic typeface by an explanation of how the McDonnell Centre serve the proposed project. A Public Facilities Plan (refer to Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. Section 4.3 of the Specific Plan) has been prepared for the pro- ject consistent with all standards and requirements of the Open Space applicable service agencies. This plan will be approved by the City and the landowner will be constructing public infrastructure policies as required by the City in order to support the land uses pro- ERC 1.1.1 70 Encourage the provision of open space elements within the larger-scale development projects including but not limited to Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business public plazas, entry courts, and planned development common Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, areas. standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code As indicated in Section 4.4 Landscape Plan of the Specific Plan, (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they each project development shall provide sufficient landscaping currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 to continue the Landscape Plan concept, a minimum of 10 per Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific cent of the net project as well as encourage the provision of development regulations and standards that will be applied to open space elements. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development regulations and building speciti- Aesthetic Resources cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- Policies vidual request. ERC 4.1.7 Include commercial, residential, industrial, and natural areas in Water. Electricity, and Gas Conservation the billboard removal programs. Policies Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business ERC 5.2.1 Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, Require, the use of reclaimed water in common areas and land- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- scape treatmgnts of all proposed developments. sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they The City does not currently have a reclaimed water supply sys- currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 tem available. As indicated in Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan, Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific reclaimed water shall be utilized where and whenever feasible development regulations and standards that will be applied to and shall comply with the City's "Water Efficient Landscape the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Requirements" (Ordinance #1452). Usage will be addressed Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- with future individual requests for development if such a system cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to is available at that time. the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- vidual request. ERC 5.2.2 Create standards for landscaping and irrigation which are in ERC 4.1.8 compliance with State requirements. Include commercial, residential, industrial, and natural areas in Landscape standards which require individual projects to sub- the electrical undergrounding program. mit and implement a landscape plan consistent with the overall Specific Plan standards and in compliance with State require- ments, are included as Section 4.4 of the Specific Plan. The landscape standards will apply to all development within the The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance, Specific Plan. which addresses appropriate trip reducing activities. As dis- cussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan, all developments 12. AIR QUALITY ELEMENT within this Specific Plan project will comply with City require- ments. The purpose of the Air Quality Element is to address air quality factors affecting the City, and establish goals, policies and pro- grams in order to help achieve the goals of the Air Quality Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- grams Plan adopted by South Coast Air Quality lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Management District. Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of An applicable goal includes: future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measure is provided as Appendix C. • Improve regional air quality by a) decreasing reliance on single occupancy vehicular trips, b) increasing efficiency Transit Trips of transit, c) shortening vehicle trips through a more effi- cient jobs-housing balance and a more efficient land use Policies pattern, and d) increasing energy efficiency. AQ 2.1.2 Require developers of employment centers with 100 or more The following applicable Air Quality Element policies are identi- employees and major activity centers to include transit ameni- fied below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how ties and transit access as an integrated part of their projects. the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves consistency. The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance, which addresses appropriate trip reducing activities. As dis- Vehicle Work Trips cussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan, all developments within this Specific Plan project will comply with City require- Policies ments. Encourage all new commercial, industrial, and residential struc- Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- lyzes to accommodate appropriate trip reducing activities such lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific as alternative work schedules, on-site day-care facilities, on-site Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- automated teller machines, "mail-in" applications, or telecom- ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of muting and/or teleconferencing facilities as technology future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measure is becomes available. provided as Appendix C. lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific AQ 2.1.4 Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- Encourage major commercial and industrial development pro- ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of jects located along transit routes to include integrated transit future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measure is access points in the project design. provided as Appendix C. A Circulation Plan has been prepared for the project consistent Vehicle Trip Distances with all standards and requirements of the applicable service agencies (refer to Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan). This plan Policies will be approved by the City and the landowner will be con- AQ 5.1.2 structing public infrastructure as required by the City in order to Continue to encourage job growth by maintaining the supply of support the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan. commercial and industrial designated land in accordance with the Land Use Map. Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Consistent with the General Plan and in accordance with the Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce public infrastruc- Land Use Map, the Specific Plan permits job-generating land ture and service improvement impacts from the buildout of uses that will assist in improving the 1992 jobs to housing ratio. future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measure is Additionally, the Specific Plan area will be incrementally devel- provided as Appendix C. oped in phases over an extended period of time as outlined in Section 4.5 of the document. The project site has been divided Carpool and Vanpool Trips into a numberof Planning Areas, creating distinct subareas and Policies allowing for private development to occur in a timely manner AQ 3.1.2 with an overall Master Plan concept. This approach will ensure Require that employment centers with 100 or more employees that future economic development opportunities will be imple- increase the availability and the "attractiveness" of parking mented dependent upon market conditions. Additionally, the spaces for vans and carpools. Specific Plan allows for flexibility in the Specific Plan Development Regulations. This flexibility in development stan- The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance, dards is intended to accommodate future market trends and which addresses appropriate trip reducing activities. As dis- tenant needs, without sacrificing the intended high-quality char- cussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan, all developments acter of the project area. within this Specific Plan project will comply with City require- ments. AQ 5.1.4 Encourage day-care facilities to be located at work sites with 100 or more employees. Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- Day-care facilities are permitted within all planning areas of the Specific Plan (refer to Section 6.0 Development Regulations). sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code Particulate Emissions (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 AQ 8.1.1 Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific Continue to enforce construction site guidelines that require development regulations and standards that will be applied to truck operators to minimize particulate emission. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code vidual request. (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park development regulations and standards that, will be applied to Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to minimize dirt the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this and soil transfer onto public roadways. A listing of the proposed Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- AQ 10.1.1 vidual request. Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy con- servation features in all new construction. Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce particu- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- late emissions resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they Appendix C. currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific AQ 8.1.2 development regulations and standards that will be applied to Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this j wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- vidual request. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, AQ 10.1.3 standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- Encourage energy use audits, and identify conservation mea- sures, for all existing commercial and industrial structures. 0 Environmentally Sensitive Habitats Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business 0 Energy Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, 0 Community Facilities standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- 0 Coastal Land Use Plan sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code 0 Next Steps in Coastal Planning (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they The goals and policies within the Coastal Element provide guid- currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 ance and direction for development in the coastal zone. Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific development regulations and standards that will be applied to The goals of the Coastal Element relate to issues which are not the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this directly applicable to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- Specific Plan, since the Specific Plan area is not within the cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to coastal zone. The Coastal Element objectives and policies are the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- also not applicable. vidual request. 14. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT 13. COASTAL ELEMENT The Environmental Hazards Element addresses flooding as it The Coastal Element, amended in 1992, includes information pertains to geologic, seismic and soils hazards. This sufficiently detailed to indicate kinds, location and intensity of Environmental Hazards Element and the referenced materials land use and applicable resource protection and development together satisfy the geologic and seismic portion of the Section policies. The Coastal Element designates different categories of 65302 (g) requirement. land uses which will be permitted within the coastal zone and Applicable goals include: specifies the areas where each land use map, categories and additional policies together constitute the Coastal Element, Ensure that the number of deaths and injuries, levels of which is intended to reflect local conditions and needs while property damage, levels of economic and social disrup- meeting the Coastal Act policies and requirements. tion, and interruption of vital services resulting from seis- mic activity and geologic hazards shall be within levels of The Coastal Element is organized around the following issue acceptable risk. areas which have been identified as relevant to the City's Ensure the safety of the City's businesses and residents coastal zone: from methane hazards. • Recreation and Shoreline Access Eliminate, to the greatest degree possible, the risk from • Visitor-Serving Facilities flood hazards to life, property, public investment and • Visual Resources social order in the City of Huntington Beach. • Water and Marine Resources and Diking, Dredging, Fill Ensure the safety of the City's businesses and resident ing and Shoreline Structures from peat hazards. sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code The following applicable Environmental Hazards Element poli- (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they cies are identified below, followed in italic typeface by an expla- currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 nation of how the McDonnell Centre .Business Park Specific Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific Plan achieves consistency. development regulations and standards that will be applied to the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Geologic/Seismic Safety Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to Policies the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- EH 1.2.1 vidual request. Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction Additionally, a Master Plan Environmental Impact Report, which such as stated in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). analyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to minimize dirt Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business and soil transfer onto public roadways. A listing of the proposed Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C. standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code Flooding (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Objective Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific EH 4.1 development regulations and standards that will be applied to Ensure that the City's flood prevention standards and practices the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this provide satisfactory safeguards for public and private develop- Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- ment. cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- The Public Facilities Section of the Specific Plan (Section 4.3) vidual request. addresses this policy. Additionally, upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the devel- EH 1.3.5 opment procedures, regulations, standards and specifications Encourage property owners to take adequate steps to protect of the Specific Plan shall supersede the relevant provisions of their property against economic risks resulting from seismic and the City's zoning code (Huntington Beach Zoning and geologic hazards. Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business amended in the future. Section 6.0 Development Regulations of Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, the Specific Plan provides specific development regulations and standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- standards that will be applied to the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development reg- ulations and building specifications not addressed in the Ambient Noise Impacts on the Community Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any individual request. Policies N 1.2.2 15.0 NOISE ELEMENT Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the The purpose of the Noise Element is to identify and appraise major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the noise problems in the community. The Noise Element recog- new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for nizes the guidelines adopted by the Office of Noise Control in causing ambient noise levels to exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A) the State Department of Health Services and shall analyze and exterior on areas containing "noise sensitive" land uses as quantify to the extent practicable, as determined by the legisla- depicted on Figure N-1. tive body, current and projected noise levels for all of the fol- lowing sources: Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, • Highways and freeways; standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- Primary arterials and major local streets; sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code • Passenger and freight on-line railroad operations and (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they ground rapid transit systems; currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 • Aviation and airport related operations; Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific • Other ground stationary noise sources contributing to development regulations and standards that will be applied to community noise environment. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this • An applicable goal includes: Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- • Ensure that all necessary and appropriate actions are cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to taken to protect Huntington Beach residents, employees, the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- visitors and noise sensitive uses from the adverse vidual request. The City Noise Ordinance addresses this policy. impacts created by excessive noise levels from station- Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- ary and ambient sources. I es buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts The following applicable Noise Element policies are identified from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed below, followed in italic typeface by an explanation of how the mitigation measures are provided as Appendix C. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan achieves con- sistency. N 1.2.5 Require development that generates increased traffic and sub- sequent increases in the ambient noise levels adjacent to noise �� sensitive land uses to provide for appropriate mitigation mea- (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they sures in accordance with the acceptable limits of the City noise currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 ordinance. Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific development regulations and standards that will be applied to . Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they vidual request. The City Noise Ordinance addresses this policy. currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- development regulations and standards that will be applied to lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts to Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specify- nearby "noise sensitive" land uses from the buildout of future cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measure is pro- the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- vided as Appendix C. vidual request. The City Noise Ordinance addresses this policy. Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report, which ana- N 1.3.7 lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Provide for the development of alternate transportation modes Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts such as bicycle paths and pedestrian walkways to minimize the from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed number of noise,generating automobile trips. mitigation measure is provided as Appendix C. Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan indicates that alternative forms Traffic and Mechanical Equipment Related Noise Impacts of transportation should also receive careful consideration. Each future business developed within the Specific Plan will be Policies required to address this issue. N 1.31 Require all new non-residential development to design and con- N 1.3.8 figure on-site ingress and egress points diverting traffic away Ensure that commercial and industrial uses, as required by the from nearby "noise sensitive" land uses to the greatest degree Air Quality Management Plan, implement Transportation practicable. Demand Management (TDM) programs such as incentives for car pooling, van pools, and the use of public transit. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business The City of Huntington Beach has adopted a TDM ordinance. Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, As discussed in Section 2.5 of the Specific Plan. All develop- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- ments within this Specific Plan project will comply with City sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code requirements. sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code 16. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ELEMENT (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 In February 1987, the Orange County Board of Supervisors Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific directed the preparation of a countywide hazardous waste man- development regulations and standards that will be applied to agement plan. The Orange County Hazardous Waste the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Management Plan, completed in January 1989 and amended in Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- June 1991, establishes a city and county action program for cations pertaining to proper disposal of hazardous waste not managing hazardous waste through the year 2000. addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any individual The City of Huntington Beach must implement and incorporate request. applicable portions of the County Plan into their General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. State law requires that implementation HM 1.1.4 of the County, Plan occur within 180 days of the Plan being Implement federal, state and local regulations for the handling, approved by the Sate Department of Health Services. An storage and disposal of hazardous materials. applicable goal includes: Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business • Reduce, to the greatest degree possible, the potential for Park Specific. Plan, the development procedures, regulations, harm to life, property and the environment from hazar- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- dous materials and hazardous waste. sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code (Huntington Reach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they The following applicable Hazardous Materials Element policies currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 are identified below, following in italics typeface by an explana- Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific tion of how the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan development regulations and standards that will be applied to achieves consistency. the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specili- Policies cations related to the implementation of federal, state and local HM 1.1.1 regulations for the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous Facilitate proper disposal of hazardous waste by providing materials not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to means for safe disposal. the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- vidual request. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business HM 1.2.2 Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, Ensure that hazardous waste transportation activities are con- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- ducted in a manner that will minimize risks to sensitive uses. Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- standards and specifications of the Specific Plan shall super- sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code sede the relevant provisions of the City's zoning code (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they (Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance), as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 currently exist or may be amended in the future. Section 6.0 Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific Development Regulations of the Specific Plan provides specific development regulations and standards that will be applied to development regulations and standards that will be applied to the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this the Planning Areas contained in the Land Use Plan of this Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specif- Specific Plan. All development regulations and building specifi- cations related to the reduction of hazardous wastes not cations not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's the City's adopted regulations in place at the time of any indi- adopted regulations in place at the time of any individual vidual request. request. HM 1.2.3 C. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES Support land uses or developments adjacent to or within close proximity of sensitive uses, which do not utilize, store, handle, Aesthetics/Urban Design or contain hazardous materials and/or waste, and which would create an unsafe, unhealthy, or hazardous condition for adja- 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific cent uses. Plan, the project proponent for subsequent projects located within the Specific Plan .area shall submit for Section 6.0 Development Regulations identifies allowable uses review and approval, an Arborist report to the Director of and assists in the control of the development of certain industri- Public Works. This report shall detail the location and al uses that may adversely impact Huntington Beach. quantity of mature trees which currently exist on the spe- Additionally, a Master Environmental Impact Report which ana- cific parcel. The final landscape plan shall illustrate which lyzes buildout of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific trees will be removed along with the quantity and loca- Plan proposes mitigation measures to reduce environmental tion of replacement trees. impacts resulting from the buildout of future land uses. A listing of the proposed mitigation measures is provided as Appendix C 2. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific of the Specific Plan. Plan, the applicant shall submit a landscape construction set for review and approval to the Public Works HM 1.3.1 Department. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a Encourage practices and technologies which will reduce the registered landscape architect and shall incorporate the generation of hazardous wastes at their source. McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan require- ments. Plants that are attractive to rodents should be Upon the City's adoption of the McDonnell Centre Business avoided. The landscape plan shall be approved by both Park Specific Plan, the development procedures, regulations, Public Works and Community Development Departments. City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department to Light and Glare ensure the following is accomplished: 1. Prior to the approval of building permits within the a. necessary review of signal warrants Specific Plan, all exterior lighting shall be consistent with b. review/approval of left turn ingress the standards established by the Zoning Ordinance C. review/approval of any added driveways (unless otherwise addressed within the Specific Plan) to d. parking analysis demonstrating parking supplies minimize on and off-site light and glare impacts. The meet or exceed the demands lighting shall be approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate to the sat- 2. Prior to approval of building permits for buildings con- isfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that truck access structed within Planning Area 5, proposed lighting shall points depicted on their "Final" site plan(s), meet the be approved by the Community Development and Public City's minimum truck turning radius standards. Works Departments. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the 3. Buildings shall emphasize the minimization of glare by Specific Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate to the sat- incorporating non-reflective building materials. Individual isfaction of the City Traffic Engineer that standards building site plans shall be reviewed and approved by (including ADA) regarding pedestrian/bicycle safety the City Community Development Department to assure along the perimeter sidewalks have been met. this measure is met prior to issuance of building permits 11 within the Specific Plan. 5. The City of Huntington Beach shall collect its traffic impact fee as "interim" levels of development occurs Transportation/Circulation prior to the issuance of building permits. These fees will relieve the developer of traffic mitigation obligations (as 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the detailed for Levels 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Tables M Specific Plan, each applicant shall coordinate with the and N of the Traffic Impact Assessment) resulting from City of Huntington Beach in developing a truck and con- the interim levels of development. The specific Level 1- struction vehicle routing plan. This plan shall specify the 3 improvements detailed in Tables M and N shall be hours in which transport activities can occur and meth- added to the City's CIP and implemented in a reason- ods to minimize construction related impacts to adjacent able time frame. residences. The final plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. 6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the Specific Plan, the applicant (MDRC) shall complete the 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho Specific Plan, each applicant shall coordinate with the identified in Table M under the Level 2 - Year 2000 (Interim without Project) condition. development at the time of developments. 7. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the 9. Throughout the Specific Plan project's implementation, McDonnell Centre Specific Plan, the applicant (MDRC) the City shall maintain and update an annual trip budget shall post a bond with the City of Westminster for the monitoring report to determine the status of the con- Specific Plan's fair-share contribution to complete the structed and approved development applications (enti- intersection improvements for Westminster and Rancho tled) development and resulting expected trips within the identified in Table M under the Level 3 - Year 2000 McDonnell Center Specific Plan area. This annual trip (Interim with Project) and Level 5 - Year 2015 (Buildout budget monitoring report shall be based upon building with Project) conditions. The bond shall not exceed permits issued and (entitled) development within the $30,000 based on today's dollars and would be adjusted McDonnell Center. The trip budget monitoring report based upon the Engineering News Record Construction shall include gross and usable square footages of the Cost Index. It would be activated at the time when the constructed and/or entitled usages, a description of the City of Westminster completes the identified intersection land usage, and the trip generation rates used for the improvements. This mitigation would be unnecessary if land usage proposed. The trip rates used in the monitor- the Cities of Westminster or Huntington Beach acquire ing report shall be those rates contained in the latest Tri intersection improvement funding through other efforts. Generation manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (currently the 5th edition and 8. An updated Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) shall be 5th edition update) or another reliable source as prepared at the expense of McDonnell Douglas or suc- approved by the City Traffic Engineer. cessor in interest as the interim trip budget is reached. This updated TIA shall be commenced when 90% of the Air Qua% interim trip budget is built or has approved development applications (entitled) and no further development shall 1. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be be entitled or constructed (beyond that development that responsible for compliance with the following: generates 100% of trips for the interim trip budget) until the updated TIA and required mitigations are reviewed A. During clearing, grading, earth moving or excava- and approved by the City. The purpose of the updated tion, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. TIA is to determine whether the trips projected for the interim condition are consistent with the actual trips and B. After clearing, grading, earth moving or excava the required traffic mitigation measures for the remaining tion: 'buildout of the McDonnell Center Specific Plan Area (currently estimated in Levels 4 & 5 as shown in Table 4 1. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to of the TIA). This revised TIA shall not relieve the devel- form a crust on the surface with repeated oper of any obligation to pay any traffic impact fees soakings, as necessary, to maintain the (should the present or any other traffic impact fee pro- crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. gram be in place) or provide for mitigation measures for 2. Spread soil binders; and 3. Implement street sweeping as necessary. anticipated within one month. C. During construction: E. Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. 1. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp F. Wash off trucks leaving site. enough to prevent dust raised when leav ing the site; G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or 2. Wet down areas in the late morning and other loose substances and building mate after work is completed for the day; rials to be covered, or to maintain a mini 3. Use low sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for mum freeboard of two feet between the top construction equipment. of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. D. Phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days. H. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm E. Discontinue construction during second stage water especially on super pads. smog alerts. Require enclosures or chemical stabiliza 2. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be tion of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or responsible for compliance with the following: other aggregate materials. A. Require a phased schedule for construction activ- J. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting ities to minimize daily emissions. driving speed limits on these roads. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of 3. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be exposed excavated soil during and after the end responsible for assuring that vehicle movement on any of work periods. unpaved surface other than water trucks shall be termi- nated if wind speeds exceed 15 mph. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been, or 4. During grading and construction, the applicant shall be are expected to be unused for four or more responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the pro- consecutive days). ject site and the maintenance of the paving. D. Require the planting of vegetative ground 5. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific cover as soon as possible on construction Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that sites and super pads if construction is not construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. Provision of a commuter transportation coordina- 6. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific tor, with responsibilities to include coordinating Plan, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorpo- and facilitating formation of carpools and van- ration of measures to reduce construction related traffic pools, serving as a resource person for transit congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, information, coordinating sale of transit passes, subject to the approval and verification by the Planning monitoring progress towards TDM goals and sur- Department, shall include: veying employees, etc. • Provision of rideshare incentives. Provision of a commuter center which would • Provision of transit incentives for construction per- include such information as: bus and rail transit sonnel. schedules/maps; telephone numbers for the des- • Configuration of construction parking to minimize ignated transportation coordinator; bus route and traffic interferences. Metrolink schedules; ridesharing promotional • Measures to minimize obstruction of through traf- material; bicycle route and facility information; and fic lanes. location of on-site vanpool/carpool spaces. • Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. Carpool and vanpool program, including participa- tion in a computerized matching system, provision 7. Prior to the issuance of future building permits within the of preferential parking, and provision of travel Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide proof to the City allowances/financial incentives. Community Development Director that the use will not emit objectionable odors or provide an air quality analy- Encouragement of non-vehicle modes, such as sis including a quantitative assessment of odors and bicycle, walk, or bus transit. meteorological conditions consistent with the ASTM, Standard Method D1391 or Standard Method E679-79. Transit incentives and improvements, including Project design measures or additional control technology subsidization of transit passes and dissemination shall be implemented to ensure that odor emissions of transit information and schedules. comply with SCAQMD standards. 8. Prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy within Noise the Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM) for 1. Prior to issuance of future grading permits within the review and approval by the SCAQMD and City. At a min- Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit and have imum, the plan shall include the following major elements approved a noise mitigation plan to the Department of and shall be implemented in accordance with SCAQMD Community Development that will reduce or mitigate Rule 1501: short-term noise impacts to nearby noise sensitive receptors. The plan shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and shall include, Westminster Avenue to determine if potential vehicular but not be limited to: noise will impact nearby residential units. The study will be prepared under the supervision of an acoustical engi- a. A criteria of acceptable noise levels based on type neer and include a discussion of the need for noise and length of exposure to construction noise lev attenuation measures and/or noise barriers to ensure els; compliance with City noise standards. This analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the Community b. Physical reduction measures such as temporary Development Department. noise barriers that provide separation between the source and the receptor; and Earth Conditions C. Mitigation measures such as restrictions on the Local GeolWy time of construction for activities resulting in high noise levels. 1. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific Plan, additional studies as deemed necessary by the 2. Prior to issuance of future grading permits within the Director of Public Works, shall be performed to deter- Specific Plan, the applicant shall produce evidence mine native elevations and evaluate the extent of com- acceptable to the City Engineer that: pressibility of the soils for structural design purposes. These studies shall be reviewed and approved by all a. All grading and construction vehicles and equip- appropriate departments at the City of Huntington ment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped and Beach, maintained with effective muffler systems that use state of the art noise attenuation. Seismicity b. Stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas shall be 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific located as far as practicable from sensitive noise Plan, it shall be proven to the Department of Public receptors. Works that all structures are designed in accordance C. All operations shall comply with the City of with the seismic design provisions of the Uniform Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance. Building Codes or Structural Engineers Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earth- 3. Commensurate with the updated TIA (refer to Mitigation quake. Measure 8 in Section 5.4), an updated acoustical analy- sis shall be performed on the following two roadway seg- 3. An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a ments: 1) Rancho Road near the Navy Railroad; and 2) report indicating the ground surface acceleration from Rancho Road between Bolsa Chica Street and earth movement for development parcels. All structures shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist's report. Calculations for foot- Drainage/Hydrology ings and structural members to withstand anticipated g- 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement con- the issuance of grading permits. ditions of the Public Works Department regarding storm drainage improvements which shall include, but not be Liquefaction limited to: • Construct the necessary storm drainage improve- 4. Prior to issuance of grading permits within the Specific ments (identified on Exhibit 39) to handle Plan, grading plans shall demonstrate that alluvial soils increased flows. shall be removed in the areas that will receive fill or foun- dation loading down to competent materials and recom- Ensure that building pads are placed at elevations pacted. Additional studies may be deemed necessary by suitable to withstand 100-year flood for sites adja- the Director of Public Works, to evaluate the extent of liq- cent to echoBols Road. Street between Bolsa Avenue uefaction of the soils for structural design purposes. and Rancho Road. Expansive Soils Confine street flows within the street right-of-way. 5. Prior to approval of grading permits within the Specific 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the PP g g P P Specific Plan, the project applicant shall submit and Plan, the applicant shall prepare a report for approval obtain approval of final drainage and erosion control by the Director of Public Works which assesses and plans for each project component. These final drainage provides recommendations for the following: plans shalt demonstrate that post-development stormwa- ter discharge levels from the project will remain at exist- paving Specific measures for adequate foundation, ing stormwater discharge levels. The mitigation mea- paving and flatwork design in areas of any sures contained in the plan shall be approved by the remaining expansive soils. Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Huntington Beach prior to any construction activities. b. Identify the Expansive Index onsite and specify where necessary recommen-dations included, but The plans shall include measures such as the following: not limited to: 1) presaturation of soils prior to con- crete placement; 2) raised floors; 3) post-ten- Diversion of offsite runoff away from the construction sioned slabs; 4) thicker slabs; 5) deeper footings, site 6) the addition of soil amendments to facilitate , wetting during compaction. Prompt revegetation of proposed landscaped 6. The applicant(s) shall be responsible for remedial areas; removal of expansive soils onsite during grading and Perimeter sandbagging or temporary basins to prior to construction. Should any construction occur on trap sediment; and expansive soils, the applicant(s) shall adhere to the rec- Regular sprinkling of exposed soils during con- ommendations identified above in Mitigation Measure 5. struction phases. •I 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Natural Resources/Energy Specific Plan, the project applicant shall develop a plan to implement any recommendations from the County of 1. Building design and construction shall comply with the Orange Flood Control Division and City Public Works Energy Conservation Standards set forth in Title 24 of Departments which will reduce impacts to the Bolsa the California Administrative Code. Prior to approval of Chica Channel floodplain resulting from onsite develop- building permits for the Specific Plan, architectural and ment. For example, one such recommendation would be engineering plans shall be subject to the review and the removal of the wooden bridge at a future time when approval of the Director of Public Works to ensure con- it is no longer utilized by the County operations and formance with these standards. Energy conservation maintenance staff to access the westerly bank of the features should include: Channel. This plan shall be submitted to the City Department of Public Works for review and approval. Installation of thermal insulation in walls and ceil- ings which meet or exceed State of California, 4. Prior to issuance of any grading permits within the Title 24 requirements. Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a "Notice of Insulation of hot water pipes and duct systems. Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee to the State Use of natural ventilation where possible. Water Resources Control Board to be covered under the Use of natural gas for space heating and cooking. State NPDES General Construction permit and provide Installation of ventilation devices. the City with a copy of the written reply containing the Orientation to sunlight and use of overhangs. discharger's identification number. Landscaping with deciduous trees, to provide shade in the summer months and allow sunlight 5. Prior to the issuance of the building permits within the through in the winter months. Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide a plan show- ing conformance to the Orange County Drainage Area 2. Prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Management Plan and all NPDES requirements (enact- Plan, it is recommended that the applicant consult with ed by the EPA) for review and approval by the City both the Southern California Gas Company and Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollu- Southern California Edison during the building design tants to the maximum extent practical using manage- phase for further energy conservation measures. ment practices, control techniques and systems, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions Public Services and Utilities which are appropriate. Fire 1. Prior to approval of building permits within the Specific Plan, complete building plans shall be submitted to and shall provide easy access into and within the project site approved by the Fire Department. If during the Fire for emergency vehicles and addresses shall be well Department's plan check it becomes evident that fire- marked to facilitate response by officers. Project site ground operations will become impeded, the department plans depicting these requirements shall be reviewed will impose standard fire code requirements such as and approved by the Police Department. automatic sprinkler systems, alarm systems, access roads, etc. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project shall be designed such that all areas of 2. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific the project will be well lit, including alcoves, walkways, Plan, the applicant shall contribute funding a "fair-share" doorsteps, and parking facilities. Project site plans basis towards the relocation/enlargement of the Heil sta- depicting these requirements shall be reviewed and tion, subject to the approval of the Community approved by the Police Department. Development Department. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific 3. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, an internal security system (e.g. security guards, Plan, the applicant shall be subject to a fire facility needs alarms, access limits after hours) shall be incorporated, assessment/review by the Fire Department to determine to be reviewed by the Police Department and the City the actual necessity of the new fire station and whether Planning Department. applications should be halted until the fire facility at Graham and Production Lane is in service. Schools Police 9. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate 4. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit Plan, the need for additional police officers must be fully application. These fees shall be based on the state fee evaluated by the City of Huntington Beach and the appli- schedule in effect at the time of building permit applica- cant. If it is found that additional officers are needed to tions. serve the area, funds must be procured to fill this posi- tion. Community Services 5. The Police Department shall be consulted during pre- liminary stages of the project design prior to approval of 10. Prior to issuance of grading permits for Planning Area 3 building permits within the Specific Plan to review the in the Specific Plan resulting in removal of the existing safety features, determine their adequacy, and suggest fields, the applicant shall determine if recreation facilities improvements. are needed by existing and future employees. If deemed necessary, the applicant must enter into a lease-type 6. During construction and at complete buildout, the project agreement or provision of recreation facilities for employ- AR ees to replace those lost, subject to the approval of the hours to reduce evaporation losses. City of Huntington Beach Community Services d. The use of reclaimed water for irrigated areas and Department. grass lands. The project applicants shall connect to the Orange County. Water District's "Green Library Acres" system of reclaimed water should this sup- ply of water be available. Separate irrigation ser- 11. The applicant shall provide development fees to mitigate vices shall be installed to ease this transition. conditions of increased demand as part of building per- mit application. These fees shall be based on the City fee 14. Prior to issuance of use and occupancy permits, water schedule in effect at the time of building permit applica- pressure regulators to limit downstream pressure to a tions. maximum of 60 psi shall be installed. Water 15. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, pervious paving material shall be used whenever 12. Prior to,issuance of use and occupancy permits, the fol- feasible to reduce surface water runoff and aid in ground lowing water conservation measures shall be implement- water recharge and slopes and grades shall be con ed as required by state law: trolled to discourage water waste through runoff. a. Ultra-low-flush toilets 16. Prior to issuance of use and occupancy permits, the b. Ultra-low-flow showers and faucets applicant shall provide information to prospective occu C. Insulation of hot water lines in water recirculating pants regarding benefits of low water use landscaping systems and sources of additional assistance in selecting irriga d. Compliance with water conservation provisions of tion and landscaping. the appropriate plumbing code 17. Prior to issuance of building permits, complete land 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, irrigation systems scape and irrigation plans which minimize use of lawns which minimize water waste shall be used to the great- and utilize warm season, drought tolerant species shall est extent possible. Such measures should involve such be submitted to and approved by the Water Division. features as the following: Mulch shall be used extensively in all landscaped areas. Mulch applied on top of soil will improve the water-hold a. Raised planters and berming in conjunction with ing capacity of the soil by reducing evaporation and soil closely spaced low volume, low angle (22 Y2 compaction. Irrigation system shall be designed to use degree) sprinkler heads. reclaimed water when available. b. Drip irrigation. C. Irrigation systems controlled automatically to 18. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific ensure watering during early morning or evening Plan, the Water Division of the City's Public Works Department shall be consulted during design and con struction for further water conservation measures to Public Transportation review irrigation designs and drought tolerant plant use, as well as measures that may be incorporated into the 22. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific project to reduce peak hour water demand. Plan, a bus turnout, if determined by the City Traffic Engineer to be necessary based on roadway cross sec 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the tions, travel volumes or speeds, shall be provided at Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement con each bus stop located in the project area. ditions of the Public Works Department regarding water infrastructure improvements (identified on Exhibit 40) to 23. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific handle increased water flow demands. Plan, the area adjacent to this turnout shall include a paved passenger waiting area complete with a bus shel Solid Waste Disposal ter and bench. 20. To reduce the proposed project's impacts on waste dis 24. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific posal facilities, project designs shall develop a means of Plan, a concrete bus pad sufficient to support the weight reducing the amount of waste generated both during of a bus (see OCTD's Design Guidelines for Bus construction and when the project is in use. The waste Facilities) may have to be provided at the transit stop. reduction program shall be approved by the Planning This would be necessary assuming the material used to Director prior to issuance of building permits within the construct Bolsa Avenue would be insufficient to support Specific Plan. Potential ways of reducing project waste continued transit use of the bus stop. loads include implementation of recycling programs, and Sewer use of low maintenance landscaping when possible (i.e., native vegetation instead of turf). 25. Prior to the issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, the project applicant shall implement con 21. Rainbow Disposal shall be contacted during the design ditions of the Public Works Department regarding sewer stage of project components to ensure the most efficient infrastructure improvements (identified on Exhibit 41) to and economical means for rubbish removal. The designs handle increased sewer flow demands. shall include rubbish enclosures, projected travel areas, and turnabouts where necessary. Storm Drains Please refer to Section 5.8 Drainage and Hydrology of the EIR. AR Natural Gas 26. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, The Gas Company shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. Electricity 27. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, SCE shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures. Telephone 28. Prior to issuance of building permits within the Specific Plan, building plans shall be submitted to GTE enabling GTE to assess the improvements necessary to provide adequate service to the project site. w d4