Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing - Zone Change 92-1 - Negative Declaration 92- �A STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a P ILUB C NOTICE resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the LEGAL NOTICE age of eighteen years, and not a party to or ORDINANCE NO. 3166 interested"in the below entitled matter. I am a "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. rind OF HUNTINGTON al clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH p p BEACH AMENDING INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE arculatron, printed and published in the City of CODE BY ^,. ,. AMENDING SECTION Huntington Beach, County of Oranges State of 9061 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF California,and that attached Notice is a true and ZONING FROM R •CZ TOcomplete copy a Was printed and Published In ROS-O-CZ,ON the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON' issues of said newspaperto wit the issue(s)of: THE NORTH SIDE OF PALM AVENUE APPROXIMATELY100 FEET SOUTHEAST- OF CHERRY HILL LAND(DISTRICT MAP 3►" SYNOPSIS ORD. 3166 August 13, 1992 Ordinance No. 3166 re- zones real property located on the north side of Palm Avenue approximately 100 feet southeast of Cherryhill Land, (Parcel A) from R2- PD-O-CZ (Medium Density Residential Planned Devel- I opment with oil production. Coastal Zone) Amends Section 9061 of the Hun- tington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 3 to re- flect Zone Change 92.1. THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL-1 ABLE IN THE CITY) CLERK'S OFFICE Adopted by_.the City Council of the City of Hun. tington Beach at a regular meeting held Monday, Au gust 3, 1992 by the follow. declare, under penalty ofperjury, that the ing roll call vote: P `7 AYRES: Co"unciimembers: foregoing is true and contcL R o b i t a i l l e, M o u l t o n Patterson, Winchell, Green, MacAllister,Kelly NOES: Councilmembers! 199 None Executed on Ale 15t' l 3 ABSENT: Councilmem- bers:Silva at Costa Mesa,Caiifomia. TI CITY I T Y OF BE/1CHHCon� nle Brockway, Cityl Clerk Published Huntington Signature Beach-Fountain Valley Aul gust 13,1992. 06209AJ PROOF OF PUBLICATION "STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a msident of the County aforesaid; I ant over the PUBLIC NOTICE age of eighteen years, and not a party to or LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE interested in the below entitled matter. I am a "AN NO.3167 ORDINANCE OF i principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general HUN AMENDING* . NGTON BEACH arculation, printed and published in the City Of O BDINANCE Y AM NDNGDE' Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of SECTION'9061 TO PROVIDE A ' Caldomia,and that aitaCllBd Notice is a true and ZONING OF" • .' ZONING FROM complete copy as was and published In R4-O TO ROS-O', printed f"'� ON REAL the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley PROPERTY LOCATED 1APPROXIMATELY issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s)of. OF, T FEET WEST OF THE TERMINUS OF CLAY AVENUE (DISTRICT MAP 3)" SYNOPSIS ORD.3167 Ordinance No. 3167 re- zones real property located approximately 500 feet west of the terminus of from y August 13 1992 Clay avenue (parcel B R4-O (High Densit Residential with oil produc-{{ lion) to ROS-O (Recre-f ational Open Space with oil production). Amends Sec- tion 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 3 to reflect Zone Change 92-1. THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAIL- ABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Adopted by the' City Council of the City of Hun. • tington Beach at a-iegu`lar meeting held Mondayy, Au- Pust 3;1992 by the follow- • mg roll call vote: AYES: Councilmem• bers: Robitaille, Moul- It n-Patterson; Winch- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the ell, Green, MacAllister, Kelly foregoing is true and correct. NOES:,Councilmem• bers;None ABSENT: Council- Executed an Aiicrost , 1991 members:Sllva CITY OF' HUN- at Costa M a,Caiifomia. iINGTON BEACH, Cdn- nle Brockway, City Clerk Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley In- �+�, hependent August 13, Signature 4992. 062-o9a PROOF OF PUBLICATION "STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a PUBLIC NOTICE resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the LEGAL NOTICE age of eighteen years, and not a party to or ' ORDINANCE NO. 3188 "AN ORDINANCE'! interested in the below entitled matter. I ant a OF THE CITY OF i HUNTINGTON BEACH j principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH i HAMENDING UNTINGTON INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general BEACH ORDINANCE circulation, printed and published in the City of CODE BY AMENDING ,. SECTION 9081 Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State I TCHA GE OFA of ! California,and that attached Notice is atrue and ZONING FROM R401-CZ TO complete copy as was printed and published in ROS-01-CZ ON REAL PROPERTY the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley ( APPROXIMATELY LY issues of said newspaper to wit the ime(s)of: i 500 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF OFFICIAL i LAND AND MORNING TIDE DRIVE(DISTRICT- August 13, 1992 I SYNOPSISORD.3168: 111 Ordinance No. 3168 re- :zoned real property located lapproximately 500 feet i inorth of the inteserseciton I lof Ofelia Land and Morning 1 •Tide Drive (Parcel C) from 1 IR4-01-CZ (High Density' (Residential with oil produc- tion-Coastal Zone) to ROS- 101-CZ (Recreational Open (Space with oil Production- �Coastal Zone). Amends !Section 9061 of the Hun- itington Beach Ordinance !Code, District Map 3 to re- iflect Zone Change 92-1. AYES: Councilmem-I bers: Robltaille, Moul- I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the ton-Patterson, Winch, ell, Green, MacAllister Kelly foregoing is true and correct. NOES, Councilmem- bers:None ABSENT: Council- ( members:Silva Executed on ALVL St 1 , 199 CITY OF H U N TINGTON BEACH, Con- c Costa Me California. We Brockway, Cityl Clerk Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley In- dependent August 13, Signature 1992. 082095 PROOF OF PUBLICATION d ORDINANCE NO. 3168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R4-01-CZ TO ROS-01-CZ ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF OFELIA LANE AND MORNING TIDE DRIVE (DISTRICT MAP 3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Code Amendment No. 92-1 wherein all information has carefully considered at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such Zone Change No. 92-1 is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following real property located approximately 500 feet north of The intersection of Ofelia Lane and morning Tide Drive (Parcel C, Exhibit A attached hereto) , is hereby changed from R4-01-CZ (High Density Residential with oil production-Coastal Zone) to ROS-01-CZ (Recreation Open Space with oil production-Coastal Zone) . SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) is hereby amended to reflect Zone Change No. 92-1 contained in this ordinance and on District Map 3 attached hereto. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of District Map 3 as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. f SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of ALm,Gt- 1992. Mayor 'Pdo ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2- City Clerk 01; 'City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND A PROVED: A. t � i City Administrator Dire6t-or 'o- f Community Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION e FOR ISLAND "Q" pA PC-EL- "G" 7.G 92-l BEING THAT PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 , PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE .COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: izq, 01. C j-� -6 27o�- ll COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 51 OF TRACT NO. 6904 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 270, PAGE 23 THROUGH 29, INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAP IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID CORNER BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED AS "NORTH 47024 ' 20" WEST 65 . 26 FEET" FOR A PORTION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 6904; THENCE NORTH 53054 ' 19" EAST 271 . 73 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 47035 ' 58" WEST 300 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42024 ' 02" EAST 285 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47035 ' 58" EAST 300 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42024 ' 02" WEST 285 . 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1 .963 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. AL--DEN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SSOCIATES ISLAND "Q" CIVIL ENGINEERS—PLANNERS--LAND SURVEYORS 0 8 4 4-1 6 2-1 X 10/9/9 0 180.12 COWAN.SUITE 210 • IRVINE, CA 92714 WO-No. Dote 714/660.0110 FAx:660-041: Engr. SJM Cnk. PER Shtot.___ 0�— 46 'G 7'95 5 E JOD. oe �- ti N OF a6�/NN/NG ` n ,V JI /QDo.p0 Ad GO.clMf3t/GEHIE.t/T' � .rI N¢ sz/O/t/ / 1\ ( ' jr �\j y y �0 6.sz6 �l � G1 \ L o b b �f ZLa21 VWDEN & s,�ErCN ToSOCIATES '4 [-EGAL ,�ESCrg/PT/oN NUN rl"<5 7Z= 1/ t3i=-AC,-/, C.-41 LF CIVIL ENGINEERS-►LANNERS-LAND SURVEYORS 16012 COWAN,SUM,210• IRVINE,CA 92:14 w0.H,. OBRi 4'/G2—/A- D.1. 7 1 4/66041 10 FAX:6604418 cR r. SAl chit. an.f�t of ':DLAN�JING ZONING DM 3 SECT.IONAL DISTRICT MAP 3-6-I1 - ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE' } CITY OF [ bx[xapxs..[ • to+[ DIOrxrr6 • • .rat 0, CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 2,fxL ttb a+ W-0 1.1.¢ Ct-f. ENDED W NO AMENDED oN LEGEND AN t f ORD N- ANE LADED A ORD.NO.ti+J-t DIAI 01 ouT 9"E' MEE 5-7-62 234 099 2-5-]9 76.4 2343 [bw•.,f O[wyr•.[FRx*1•l b31.KT 12-3-62 261,282 936 1-7-60 RES NO 4626 LPr" W1.[fo[x,1u o-srwcr H�JNTINGTON BEACH ; K axp,.4C9D[NT1•a b3.KT 2-21.66 545 1166 1-1,-62 61-w 2536 orrlc[-r.o,[•arox•a 6.20.66 66.19 1216 %.6.63 63-9 2640 x[.aweo.w CAD Caxw[.E— R-5.66 66-49 1271 7.2-64 64.7 2706 ac.[•Trw•L or[x ar•c[Drs„Kr -- 6-17-60 N-13 1419 1-17-e3 r[000ZONE 2606 0 Ocsw•,u r.[ rL•x a aTrd[T uqx - T 2-I].66 66.31 .4 '0-5-67 rp-_ 29p6 3x0,[[rk h3,.KT (1 13 _�1 G L C 0 li \ T 1 C :1 L I r 0 R=`I I A 9-19 BB-9 2959 CO,.Kp�,, bl..00uc,xxr T 6.24-70 69.34 1562 8 souxo[D e•r.1x.:[ a.[,oow[xaar 0-•9-70 70-q 1606 ® Ce ox xa lc •v[.ow e,•,•ME IPIST.O Y 5-3-71 71-1 1645 mLSTu COxaC,wlgx 013,+CT 1-3.72 71-37 1706 c4•f1u lox[swrn 5.15.72 72-13 1746 +=aRKxni•rI1GUl,wh PST.KI -OS tONer1.0—OL rROh![ 7-7-72 72-16401 1761 1_15.73 72Z 1613 •O- fAWr+rl 0', 7-2-73 72-59 1655 a- [ONex4:D--aL rxop 1— •' q-15.73 73-20 1676 ® ,LOODft w 05T.KT J..6.74 73-31 1963 %/. 'n7wn rtmD zw-rr2 �l 11RF IELD 2-19-76 PPSA79-52024 AVENUE \, / I L CC-CZ - R4 0-CZ / RA-0 I-CD cl- R4-0 M2-01 • a DC' - n..D (71 p' ! ROS-0M2-01 -CD , : . ._ { RI e J•4 C ,o DD[ acl. sr RI RreD RIB A 1-R4-01 : Rif, <<4 Y RI ;� j _ �.�..• [...,y.. Lam• ROS-0 RI I_ D °( f �I. R4-OI' it :� RI RI r I ROS-0 �:. I RIy RI C. Rk RLi` Q '�' sOP•01•C 6 1 3 }, io 92Qo` q�Ao.o,' ROS-0 .zy\.; RI _ o i >\Cra 0. V ee j` j e9 I R4-01 ` RI Rl jRI i R4-01 .. _ [i ;u �, ;i�_�_�`'•,� sq 1at��Ca�11[-1LMi1'! airy `,�/ /-RI tie '•c..,�, ¢ i i n' •R2-PD-0•CZ - cR4-OI, / RI 5 .•e(r 1 %� '�n.:,(2�, �"7,,' r 4. .tom •.d�- ,r�• '�� '..:.:/ r�i� ROS `R2-pD-0•CZ1 �tti^_[+FFOeut•t -O I p1.v R2-RD•0-CZ ` f•n'a R1• Al R-0 h• {64 of-••'' �--'K ^'°�. •4ax - R4-Di-C .w• A R �"- � = ROS-0 CZ zR1C2 I R4-3 �• �'' 01 `; RI �C'::�-' RI-0 I ♦I n 9t+�f 9 LN"_ " 9� O.� 0.1 `.RI Q` •• I v~ . T,D[ A r{ .� \`. �-eyCt 3 1.C2 R1 `,O X, �*..-. -I •'i;4•�aa. RsO. R R .CI c}••►,`• f •.*'`••`' � •. J. 1 �/ •D{I�SC '.'• 94 ti4Ji.. c. 4 CI-0 T1 •,•RI'0 3+ 4S A RI-0 ri^' �•, r*.ems ; G~, ,� �. ,� 4* c� °�qti M2-01-CZ °� �' o ti ti' X, L.`I. =;j .: {s �. ..; , A- i/� :�� '°�ti �tel' �10 34.y~ <�[• tiar°/ �;�i0' RI-0 -,�p;.�•I. f ~ C� � Taw.aor 9[rYK I\A. f I r. �%ROS-0 2-01 -C a' M D .. . ,s •fir .<.,, L.., R4-0IrP= �.. �;,,, :ram Fo .y._ - R� �-n• t e ,e• o ClYo �� r °°. sip RI _l n1•co RI .` A" •� R4-�� 1 .c"'_'zi•_ .. 6 RI .•74 RRII j Po.o' if F d/ -; %� .� ROS-0 1 RI ,! �; 44 01 RI 7 °L ROS-O ¢/I ; .,..,..: RI RI A RI ° RI I .01 to 1 kk-1,, RI R s. a 3 �'� 9,0 cl R4-01R RI I RI/N,1 ' R4 01 ' u 'sa[y�a .�.. �� `.1 1, •Ita:_n,r:.�s_ v �� d'` tvy f•' , �RI��/RI pit ;i .r a ;f ti 11 0 R2•PD-0•GZ .1✓ �', \ :i a , , " R4-01 0< � _1 i ¢ '%+!SC9�<!--!'; 1. .� 4. c L� •�� � Y� S-0 9 4 .: "1r✓,' b :R2 P 0 CZ 4 1.>.. r.ry ' D RO •[ Y L h. % /'* RI - �. az R D CZ - R AL.L -t— ROS-O-CZ ��%R�:«• R4 Is \' �n 7 Fit •ter :,.a J w �5��� Q� y( o-/` `v_�`_LL� 4'T .._a�/'R� ,\P;. RI-0 lb ti. e RI.O 'w b • a ZC 92-1 _ HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION Ord. No. 3168 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 20th ay of July 19 92 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 3rd day of Aucrust 19_92 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council . AYES: Councilmembers: Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Silva City Clerk and ex-officio Merk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ` I ORDINANCE NO. 3167 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R4-0 TO ROS-0 ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET WEST OF THE TERMINUS OF CLAY AVENUE (DISTRICT MAP 3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Code Amendment No. 92-1 wherein all information has carefully considered at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such Zone Change No. 92-1 is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The following real property located approximately 500 feet west of the terminus of Clay Avenue (Parcel B, Exhibit A attached hereto) , is hereby changed from R4-0 (High Density Residential with oil production) to ROS-0 (Recreation Open Space with oil production) . SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) is hereby amended to reflect Zone Change No . 92-1 contained in this ordinance and on District Map 3 attached hereto. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of District Map 3 as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August 1992 . Mayor' pro Tempore ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk �6,City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED ND A PROVED: / _ 1 City Administrator Director Community Development S Ord. No. 3167 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 2othday of July 1S2 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 3rd day of August 19 92 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council . AYES: Councilmembers: Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Green, MacAllister, Kelly NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Silva My Clerk and ex-officio C rk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING PURPOSES 12A 42G it Z-4f- q 2-l BEING THAT PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1?-L +-D 40 Zo5 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 OF TRACT NO. 7421 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED 1N BOOK 302, PAGES 20 THROUGH 23 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 76°4326" WEST 158.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82"26'25" WEST 324.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°21'59" WEST 127.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 90-198, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 266, PAGES 37 THROUGH 41 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 02°06'09" EAST 3.14 FEET; THENCE ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2 THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTH 43"48'10" EAST 151.41 FEET, NORTH 36°35'30" EAST 109.38 FEET, NORTH 56052'22" EAST 157.58 FEET, NORTH 80035'37" EAST 262.07 FEET, SOUTH 89037'24" EAST 72.36 FEET, AND NORTH 00-22136" EAST 5.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79052'36" EAST 6.34 FEET ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE SOUTH 08017'50"EAST 25.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03°57'32"WEST 3.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89040'12" WEST 10.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°21'35" WEST 95.13 FEET; THENCE 15*21'32" WEST 6.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18'00'52" WEST 71.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89040'12" WEST 21.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°19'48" WEST 67.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2.31 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. VWDEN & LtUAL FOR SOCIATES REZONING PURPOSES CIVIL ENGINEERS—PLANNERS—LAND SURVEYORS 0844-162-1 X 1/2im 18012 COWAN.SUITE 210 a IRVINE. CA 92714 WO.No. Date 714!660-0110 FAX:660-0418 Engr rFR Chk. Sheet Of � IgQg°r7 50 E I S 03'S7'32"W WELL NB." 00 +r�r✓t �� 25.89' 3.47' �� ,VB9'4D'/2'W I✓�11 1 I'10 V � 95./3' S/Bp G.56' /V89'¢O%Z'W \ Lo7 e, rpsfcr `No. 742/ N, t� Z fV -E� II it FIB w 0.3/ ACRES qu � N 2 5'LYG/NE AW061- 2 P.M.it rl 90-/98 N P.M.B. 2GG�37-4/ N N N z (1� t N � N, V' N� Z E'LY L/NE GA�PCEL �e 2, P.M. Nth 90-/96, S -• �� SCALE: /~�GO' �`3n N '�Af1v jil''•ti � � Z�- 92-1 ALDEN & SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY SSOCIATES A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REZONING PURPOSES LIM ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-LAND SURVEYORS 0 844-162- IX I/21/92 I8012 COWAN,SUITE 210• IRVINE,CA 92714 wo.No. Date 714/660-01e0 FAx:6&ao.u, rn r. P R cnw. sheet of r • PLANNING ZONING DM 3 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 3-6-11 �- •-., ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE' ' CITY OF : bNE.fb.f.AE 20.E 01.. G . 10H, or .. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 fN� .DED 10 1A1-,D 10 N4 CE.— or iucx aNl or LEGEND AMENDED AS ORD. AMENDED ORO.NO. xOueTRIAI DrsTR,cr AR;py ME y RCSOOrtrI br, 5-7.62 234 699 2-5-79 76-4 23.3 r[bw—DEW1 RESIMN 4 ISIa L0.DENN„R[9DEm4 QSTRC 12-5-62 261,282 936 I-7-60 RESN0..629 rmN DEN"TT,[lDdn4 bS, H�JNTIN GTON BEACH 2-21-66 545 86 -I9-62 1 2536 . OrEItC•PROrEASIOx4 6.20.64 66-19 1216 9-6•B3 B3-B 2640 NCIOn90RHOOD CONNERCIAL 12-5.66 66-19 1271 7-2-84 84.7 27p6 RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE 013-4T 6-17.66 66-13 1419 1-t7-BS FEDO55DZONE 2�69p066 0 DEWiATEA PREC6C P.Ax 0 ST42'A.Ke.4NT 2.17.69 6B•31 M72 9-98BB 88-9 2959 ® SNNONCLNF QSTRCf ORANGE C�_► U \TI'17, CALIF 0 R'�I A 6$4-,0 69-34 I$B2 E� COYeu ED,nTM pl M DOIICTW .AE, I �ouxxo e.PALN AVE ON"a. AE. T 10.19.70 70-10 1606 ® T.ON Nr,OCEAN APE.ON E.,A EEOENTn Sl ON 9C. 5.3•71 71-1 "A3 CDAST4 CONSE-1—D,S,NKT I-5-72 71.37 1706 CwsT420N[sum. 5.15-72 72-13 1746 L;R.I •ia'DEN—L AGRK,VL AL bSTR.:: 02 cOl MT.M MNOOKI- 7-7-]2 72-16(G) 1761 -co P——TRK• 1•I5-73 72-35 IB13 -0: cor NG OIL 7-2-73 72.39 IB55 oI- C INNCO.^x OL wop,n Nw T_ I0 -,5-73 73-20 ,676 CM ELODOPLARI M,— 9.,6.74 73-31 1943 1/4 --7LOOD ZON(•112 1 \' GARFIELD 2-19-76 PPSA79.52024 AVENUE CC-CZ- / - R4-0-CZ RA-0 I-CD R 4-0 ;'& C I-0 �_ i W W o M2-01 -CD Ilk A v- ' e••••;`� g• ,C�� ` ', _eo.I. snOO�;--- fL , '� ••un RI -RI-CD RI �.�L a a -;-.•. �A:- '�x�R4-01 ,T.2, DT,• 'RI _ R 1 �-ii ROS-0 I �� o R RI 4 RI , cvwoa ar'' - \, •.`Y'. _ qN. -'j,'. .`"fi..RI-DI t RI- n ER 5 �ROS-0Y. '' ...:.a.:,J / RI I"( �RI �. C RI RI 11 l • P/0 w :J �� `II RI RI I';I 3 \R1/�R9 °,_ L,� . op•01-co z 9t0 O/ F 'If__Ji- W o• •„ ROS 0 = RI oz -':�r ',• +: 1 �' Z R4-01J+ \� �i+�/,� RI RI t . R 4 -0 R4-01 Sr 4 c a \ ' tit RI r ,; . R2•PD'D Cz; R4-01 •�;•., • `� Er,.' Q /�' ROS-0 Fo ` 1.,!•; p1R0.0'"'. i. / RI-0 ! 42•PD 0 CZ �7 w,2rE R R0S 0 CZ �,,, V* 0 01 R1 RI-0 ( •,4' �•• C.�'4N 9\�-r.� Rr'0. IR 'RI 4 �' eIKL RY z arcs 1 RI x� '0` •,t d. i Eti ` r RMoa r „Dc a ,. .__ U RI-0 R\_CZ /"�'•}°bbj �• , 6 Rro'CZ a.E P`G•i� ( •�{�_'tl,� ram` / t�4 , 0 ar:cZ �+ fls bEi[ e/'%.,ter- �, CI-0 �.. R10 RIOr;�. 1 cF9� M2-01-CZ �r o ,` ti c �' 01 yf ° '/� / \ \ �L �ti 3�y�` `.c, ryryr I'jl`0'•. RI-0 ' /O L(n LL 3 GOB ( o c� mac. tORMOT 6RCiK PLAN 2 c/ cF4y 'cA \a (\ ISFcrIpli'E IONE �•`'i v' '�K. 7RoSlo M2-01 -CD ... R4-01 C�t Flo-co RI A—!,m:. RI R4-04- mg-w-- R, RI C, ROS-0 RI W. R4-01 RI RI -0 RI R 11 1 E ROS Rl RI Rl- op p uj ROS-0 _j Rl.0 0 s! 'Pil RI RI/4-01 2, .0, ?R4 1, 4-0 V"AiN RI Rl R2-- R4-01 0 ROS-0 0 CZ RI-0 ik2,poo ROS-0-CZ R4 ol RI -c" R I 0 R RI-0 ;" 5� .ct :c M,cz cl-0 RI A. Rl-Or, ZC 92-1 44"le HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTIt4GTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION ' J f ;a ORDINANCE NO. 3166 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM R2-PD-O-CZ TO ROS-0-CZ ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PALM AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTHEAST OF CHERRY HILL LANE (DISTRICT MAP 3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Code Amendment No. 92-1 wherein all information has carefully considered at said hearings, and after due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all evidence presented to said City Council, the City Council finds that such Zone Change No. 92-1 is proper, and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The following real property located on the north side of Palm Avenue approximately 100 feet southeast of Cherryhill Lane (Parcel A, Exhibit A attached hereto) , is hereby changed from R2-PD-O-CZ (Medium Density Residential Planned Development with oil production-Coastal Zone) to ROS-0-CZ (Recreation Open Space with oil production-Coastal Zone) . SECTION 2 . Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, District Map 3 (Sectional District Map 3-6-11) is hereby amended to reflect Zone Change No . 92-1 contained in this ordinance and on District Map 3 attached hereto. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of District Map 3 as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August 1992. Mayor ►P PLO - TFIn paCt ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: l ' City A ministrator _ D3 ecto of Community Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A" SOUTHERLY OF TRACT NO. 10069 BEING THAT PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF . ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 , PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : �Z _ ��-(]—G� +Z? BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT. 9 OF TRACT NO. 10069 IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 504, PAGE 37 THROUGH 43, INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAP IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID CORNER BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED AS "NORTH 67055 ' 01 " WEST 40 .06 FEET" FOR A PORTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 10069; THENCE SOUTH 67055 ' 01 " EAST 393 . 03 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 10069 TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 15 OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 00001 ' 28" EAST 101 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24013 ' 46" WEST 60 . 02 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE, 100 . 00 FEET IN WIDTH, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 10069, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 950 . 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 24013146" ; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 373 . 64 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22032104" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 850 . 00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 01041 ' 42" WEST; . THENCE WESTERLY 42 . 36 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02051 ' 20" ; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PALM AVENUE, NORTH 19000 ' 00" EAST 198. 03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71000 ' 00" WEST 10 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19°00 ' 00" EAST 29 . 00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING AN AREA OF 1 . 641 ACRES, MORE OR LESS . kSSDIEN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL "A" SOUTHERLY OF OCIATES TRACT No. 10069 CIVIL ENGINEERS—PLANNERS—LAND SURVEYORS WO.No. 0844-162-1X Date 10/9/90 19012 COWAN.SUITE 210 • IRVINE, CA 92714 714/660-0 1 10 FAX:660-0418 Enpr. SJM Chk. PER $host—L Ot 2 �ry sa . a J t� m . yy � op 1 z5top� " Sol Sp i lit' P. ,P•G. m 04. r anti � of 1 ZG 92— • • JWDEN &SOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS—PLANNERS—LAND SURVEYORS HU/V 7'/1/6 TO/V 8 4c-,4 Cy, CA GF. 16012 COWAN.SUITE 210 • IRVINI,CA 92714 WO.No. O6�f4-/62-/X pE,R /O B O N4/660-0110 FAX:660-0rit En r. ` Chk. e_e Shast Z Of 2 rPL'ANNNG ZONING DM 3 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 3-6-11 ADOPTED MARCH 7,1960 NOTE' ' CITY OF = : aN D' .K 'Ell T N TO+[ 010'..K .., Ol + CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 754 or f"I'D•� o;IN TO [ CE+TE• >� LEGEND AMENDED ORD`N0. AMENDED • ORD.NO. Rm +oosTRIE FIGS T •4aEr DE""DE"" [NTUL as*RCT T1' S-T-62 254 899 2-5-79 76-4 2543 •E-.-M-11 NES4!ENTNIL aSTeCT H �J NTI NGTON BEACH 4-2-66 266-19 936 1_7 3_ 26 0 LOW a Q-0 0 COI•E-a3Twtt +•O•X -•4fDEMTI.L aSTRI[T 2-21.66 545 1186 I-IR-82 81-N 2536 a•IC[ r+yt.3:D+u 6-20.66 66.9 1216 9-6.83 83-8 2640 w[:c•So+•O00 COww[RCI•L 12-5.66 66-49 1271 7-2-84 94-7 2706 R[CK.TIOr E.S•.CE DIST"T 6.17.69 68.13 1419 I-17-03 FLOOCZONE 2606 ® O[3{+••rES r C6E•L.N O STREET.L*6 CNT 2-n-68 68-31 N79 -0.5-07 Q.-! 2906 m S•dI!-K DS-•CT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9-19-88 88.9 2959 ® DO to rT.aE lE.OftTME. W. 6.24.70 69-34 .606 97 ON Nl eT EM •[. oN W. oSEVENTHS 5_3. 1 70.1 1643 ® ST + DWA l OI Sr,S f[KwiNST.oN s[. 6-3.71 71-1 ,643 CL►5T•.CdS[•�iwN DISTRICT 1-3.72 71-37 1706 C vl 7:M W-1.0 5.15-72 72-13 1746 •=a/(•iil-- T[A.L af-0 7-7-72 72.161G1 1761 -GD �•�'��<+ NOaKTgw I-15.73 72'SS 1913D.- 7-2-73 72.39 1835 -0I' COw►-45•.,•aL.NooucINN 73-20 1876 ® 7Lo0O�_•r tr3TRCT ��-f.1�u� 1,-~' %^t •• 9_16.74 73-N 1943 %/. vlTr RaOC zh -rvT •,!I! \ GARFIELD 2-19-76 PPSA79.52024 AVENUE -0-CZ R4 r� M2-0-CZ �/ R 4-0 C I-0 RA-0 I-CD N ROS-0 °CG'•:'E t.. M2-01 -CD ol RZO, L':. +c��s..-.00°:-- •c`.c'f u- L ,q RI • CZ "-.e Yq,'-_-�., -�'s,'-'.RQ-•ac• v.z 3,•D:lr,. .P1n' c1 j�a :fit ,1�"�o e- RI'L q RI Rl `Ta1.p0-o ./ , •dry; FC, 1 ,• , 3...,�, ' • ROS-0 ,- ;d R4-OI' x R I RI `•e, •`q'y = ` _.R1•o1 RI- ,u. 5 [ ROS-0 .:` .F •) .o•.s,v.•��^ i RI R I I RI 4 MI•+ ,��y .� W:: ,;- .\• _ �. R1:7 .r �6 RI RI'e s 3 ;fie g2Ao 92A° O ROS-0 :wof R I �' ,.d... �R4_01 RI RI J,RI/ Y y. ��3:sL1n_vs71 6 I I O 11 j ti OOO: •l-• � '.�\ S. -�issi \ Yam/3' �4. RI R2 PD 0 CZ _�+ rR4_O `�.•:.`• \� ,3.NS°° RI & 'd R2-PD'0 CZ �2s�E`Vtt.0 ROS LAO `� �• 4.� RIF• s - RI-0 a2.oD•O R2-P 0 -•Z �`'' :'� ;�4 •,�„7;a RI t/ �, h \,_.I. .4L• R4-01_C2� ..c+••O•a3 - Rr- N1, 6c ,•i.. at- o[REt g 0 s _ ROS-O-CZ . • p1-CZ R4 a,. R I eta �.. i •~ .N/-0 Rt-u' D+. •� � ° i' L.\:L ••.1', .r a I h No4w+,O r s ch f�' .? •' RI-0 '-.- I \ �•Vy b. •mot. h Rro'CZ •r[ 4 .^:•' •,�n{, ��J-�`�• t F ` 2.7•a � '♦o f '�' 0C{- °4 tiP a RI 0 � °. 4 cl M2-01-CZ °::a q•�•�/�.��b _y A RI aO��:.= �:;• 10 y•�� �1 \ �i� �iE� �'C ��.'�,q`4 a �a`�O/ l /O RI-0 q�y' ry •1, j C ` �\ G 70MlOT 334 V 1C oL �,1 4 `.IN g4.rr t• � 1 Y • I Y a `� �• Rv .��. a°o '..rS-0 M2-01-CD Sys o, SF. - ,• >+,. +0.,0`1.• wu _ .. o00 _ -¢ RI v,x,• c t Ra-01 Rl -co " e•ct `.v' o�.' ._- "� „ Rl R4-0It.: il,,,, p " I D RI " RI ROS-0 RIRl ". R401 2� g RI a yk LLL��t i RI c". RI + C ROS-0 RI RI „ R11. R4-01 —` RI RI RI/ i ILL 4 i i a n'1 rSAM W r ♦�'"'' .tf Rl/ lQ�` g R2 PD o cz Rq_Ojt ' RI ' a t1nlKCowi1 c.: \\\f - �4. Q b :iR2-PD'0•CZX/ ,fL•n�i.,a•,i,r.•—',et•+ , i` q• F' ,'I '2 ara° �PD- `CZ / '"syt ' ` RI-0 ROS-O-CZ R4- I _ ,.. •'h ' I .r ��.:�• 01 RI-0 ��.gV,•.`J� 41'M Ai. N,.° "'P RI . " 8• `�iidl......iM�., ,� "O Q. la.c7 RI-0 vt p' ... C1 r i`b�, ° 'C` al.ct � a�'°.c: ti;E:: • `�S •, q 4�a 1: .. a CI-0 me tr�.�eea.� , o. 9. r.•:.",f;J RI-0 +w b i ,�'" 6 ZC 92-1 NUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION y Ord. No. 3166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the loth day of July 19 92 and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting therof held on the 3rd day of Auqust 19 92 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Councilmembers: Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson. W'nch _I1. Green. ManA1liGtPr, Kelly NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Silva 040 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date July 20, 1992 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator l Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Developme Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-1:RECREATION OPEN SPACE ZONE CHANGES IN THE SEACLIFF AREA Consistent with Council Policy? [ Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception �it a� # e3 / 47 al 49 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF I SSUE• 7� 19�- ? ('/ � 3 L 6 3 16.7 3 Transmitted for City Council consideration is Zone Change No. 92-1 which is a request by Pacific Coast Homes to rezone three (3) parcels from Medium and High Density Residential to Recreation Open Space. RECOMMENDATION• Motion to: "Approve Negative Declaration No. 92-6 and Zone Change No. 92-1 with findings and adopt Ordinance Nos. 3164 3147, and 3169 " , PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AND FINDINGS FROM JUNE 3, 1992 : ON A MOTION BY ROY RICHARDSON AND SECOND BY KEN BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-6 AND ZONE 1. CHANGE NO. 92-1 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE BASED ON FINDINGS: AYES: Newman, Richardson, Shomaker, Detloff, Bourguignon, Inglee NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: 1. The proposed Zone Change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-0-CZ, R4-0 to ROS-0 and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ conforms with the City' s Land Use plan and Coastal Element of the General Plan. PI O 5/85 2. The proposed Zone Change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-0-CZ, R4-0 to ROS-0 and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ is consistent with existing surrounding recreation and residential land uses . ANALYSIS: On June 3, 1992 the Planning Commission approved Zone Change No. 92-1 which is a request to rezone three (3) parcels in the Seacliff Area to Recreation Open Space. The area map (attachment 1) contained in this report, illustrates the location of each parcel . All three parcels are located on or near the Seacliff Country Club. The following is an inventory of the zone change request : Existing Proposed General Parcel Zone Zone Plan Acres Land Use A R2-PD-0-CZ ROS-0-CZ LDR 1. 64 Seacliff Country Club Tennis Courts B R4-0 ROS-0 LDR 2 .31 Fifth Tee on Golf Course C R4-01-CZ ROS-01-CZ OS-R 1. 96 "Q" Island Pacific Coast Homes has initiated Zone Change No. 92-1 in order to satisfy the requirement of the existing Seacliff Specific Plan and the recent approval of development for "N" Island. The following is a summary of required and provided open space acreage: Area Required Provided Seacliff Specific Plan 4 . 6 ac. 1. 0 ac. "N" Island 2.3 ac. Parcel A 1. 64 ac. Parcel B 2 .31 ac. Parcel C 1. 96 ac. 6 . 9 Acres 6. 91 Acres The above table illustrates that the applicant has provided 6 . 91 acres of Recreation Open Space Zoning which satisfies the City' s requirement of no net loss of Recreation Open Space zoning in the Seacliff area. RCA 7/20/92 -2- (3594d) The zone change is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan pursuant to the Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix (Fig. 4 . 1 of the Huntington Beach General Plan) . Recreational Open Space zoning is consistent with Low Density Residential as well as Open Space-Recreation land use designations . It should be noted that the Low Density Residential designations on Parcel A and B, although consistent with the zoning, will be amended to Open Space as part of the City' s comprehensive General Plan update. Environmental Status: Zone Change No. 92-1 is covered by Negative Declaration No. 92-6. All written comments to Negative Declaration No. 92-6 are included in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 3, 1992 (see attachment 2) . Prior to action on Zone Change 92-1, Negative Declaration No. 92-6 must be approved. Coastal Status : The rezone of Parcel A and C will result in an amendment to the City' s Certified Local Coastal Program. The proposed zoning is consistent with the City' s General Plan and Local Coastal Program. The proposed zoning will maintain the CZ Suffix which is consistent with the requirements of the California Coastal Act. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may deny the zone change request which will require the applicant to find alternative sites for compliance with the Seacliff Specific Plan and Seacliff area open space requirements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Ordinance No. 31(0(' , Ordinance No. 31o7 and Ordinance No. 3 . Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 3, 1992 MTU:MA:RLF: lp RCA 7/20/92 -3- (3594d) ' � .G�' „��• ••� n r � ui�d°ot�n. `may; .. _..✓-...;- �,P° ROS-0 M2 01 CD :. _ •; _ -� �; _ ;` �'• �od:` '•. � �'.�`• .<.: ----.. ---... ,. i. �R4-01:?Real. � •..• a O RI R I' • ,•0..'^'ct •.,°'� :r d~ .Y� `/ ., '$R4-0,1ji RI _f `' /i;Mo RI DR az cl, 1..— - ROS-0 11R RI RI jRl- R I r1=L) ROS-0 RI F"+ RIRI „ ti q /:r :.•w 6 RI Rlb g 3 -.:R� : 9�.qp•, - Ate.. op ROS-0 RI o ,05 N MI6 J.1�. �'-•°L:"�� R4-01 ,..,RI RI RI/ .. N o ��� • �',v /� R4-01RI �- •�.ya I ;¢ i i i g R2•PD0CZ rl R..4-011 °'"' �� .. w° ' '+ •'�' ..: ROS-0 A p !R2-PD-0-CZ ,>v. .. '• ''- -- .e�,, s. :Xi,eQ.� �` "'r . IU' R1-0 a, � A:rwa:Y'• I -01-C a `�� �. g R1 `�•. �I ROS-O-CZ 0191E l ;R,C RI RI-0 c;��_ 1 RI-0 ° :e- .v: CI-0 RI 0.- 0 ZC 92-1 _ HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTiNGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION huntington beach department of community development STAff JRE pOR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JUNE 3 . 1992 ZONE CHANGE NO, 92-1/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION N0, 92-6 The proposed zone change request is for three (3) parcels located in the Seacliff area by Pacific Coast Homes which will satisfy a condition of approval of Zone Change No . 88-9 which required 4 . 6 acres of open space zoning . This zone change request will provide additional open space zoning to cover the recently approved residential development on "N" Island located near the Estates project . In each zone change case, the request is to rezone to Recreation Open Space . Each site is either on the Seacliff Golf Course or adjacent to Seacliff Country Club. Two (2) of zone change requests will result in an amendment to the City' s Certified Local Coastal Program. 4w, a G� v U � 7W' w (sG,� � f IVAX � r _ A-PL-FM-230 !, �ROS-0 M2 01 CD - ;� ,��'SF• *mot ��: - P, n=: / �5�• x R4-��a, B Rl /V T. y RI R 0 S-0 j R I V �J c .j� 4 (l; - ...- /,� R I RI Rl I- RI RI iR.,a• o o ,` R IRI I II I ,2. o,c� � �'� ••ter; � ,01 - X R4-01 a N c R2-PO'C'CZ. - \R4-01• -'♦ - l -RI/ �.o nZ PD° :. ROS-0 AROS-0-CZW .� x �(/'�' `';�. ,'7<� Imo' .``�- -��` j" l+'`-�_��_/..jR�,•' �\Rl RI-0 RI-0 .a.:...ra. RI ZC 92-1 HUNTINCTON BEACH HUNTINGTON MACH PLANNING DIVISION r TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE : June 3 , 1992 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-1/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-6 APPLICANT/ Pacific Coast Homes PROPERTY 2124 Main Street, Suite 200 OWNER: Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REOUEST: Rezone three (3) parcels : Parcel A - R2-PD-0-CZ to, ROS-O-CZ Parcel B - R4-0 to ROS-0 Parcel C - R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ LOCATION : Parcel A - North side of Palm Avenue approximately 100 feet southeast of Cherry Hill Lane . Parcel B - Approximately 500 feet west of the terminus of Clay Avenue . Parcel C - Approximately 500 feet north of the intersection of Ofelin Lane and Morning Tide Drive . GENERAL PLAN: Parcel A - Low Density Residential Parcel B - Low Density Residential Parcel C - Open Space - Recreation EXISTING USE : Parcel A - Seacliff Country Club Parcel B - Vacant Parcel C - Vacant - Former Oil Production Site ACREAGE: Parcel A - 1 . 64 Parcel B - 2 . 31 Parcel C - 1 . 96 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION : Motion to : "Approve Negative Declaration No . 92-6 with mitigation measures and Zone Change No . 92-1 with findings and forward to City Council for adoption. " 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Zone Change No . 92-1 is a request for to rezone three (3 ) parcels from R2-PD-O-CZ to ROS-O-CZ , R4-0 to ROS-O, and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ . The request to rezone the three (3) parcels has been initiated to satisfy a condition of approval of Zone Change No . 88-9 which established the Seacliff Specific plan. When the Seacliff Specific Plan was adopted the applicant was required to provide 4 . 6 acres of open space zoning . An acre was provided in Zone Change No . 90-14 which was approved by the City Council on May 4 , 1992 . Zone Change No . 92-1 will provide the balance of Recreation Open Space zoning . Further, for each site General Plan Designations will be changed to Open Space Recreation as part of the forthcoming General Plan Update . 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS : North of Subject Property: Parcel A• GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential ZONE : R2-CZ LAND USE : Residential Parcel B : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE : Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan LAND USE : Vacant Parcel C : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space ZONE : ROS-CZ LAND USE : Golf-course East of Subject Property: Parcel A: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Open Space ZONE : ROS-CZ LAND USE : Recreation Parcel B • GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE : R4 LAND USE : Vacant Parcel C : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space ZONE : ROS-CZ LAND USE: Golf course Staff Report -2- (3426d) 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS : South of Subiect Property: Parcel A: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential ZONE : R4-CZ LAND USE: Vacant Parcel B : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 LAND USE : Residential Parcel C: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space ZONE: ROS-CZ LAND USE : Golf course West of Subiect Property: Parcel A: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R2-CZ LAND USE : Residential Parcel B : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Low Density Residential ZONE : Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan LAND USE : Vacant Parcel C : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space ZONE: ROS-CZ LAND USE : Golf-course 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time, the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No . 92-6 for thirty (30) days . Written comments were received and have been included in Negative Declaration No . 92-6 with staff response (see Attachment No . 1) . The staff , in its initial study of the project , has recommended that a negative declaration be issued . Prior to any action on Zone Change No . 92-6 , it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No . 92-6 . Staff Report -3- (3426d) 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: The rezone of Parcel A and Parcel C will result in an amendment to the City' s Local Coastal Program. The rezone requests will bring the sites into conformance with existing uses and general plan designations . The proposed zoning is consistent with the City' s General Plan and the City' s Certified Local Coastal Program. The proposed zoning will apply the CZ suffix which is consistent with the requirements of the California Coastal Act . 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : Not applicable . 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE : Not applicable . 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : The following is a discussion of issues and analysis of each parcel : The primary issue associated with a zone change request is consistency with the City' s General Plan . The City' s General Plan contains language and a table which identifies which zoning classifications are consistent with Land Use Categories . On pages 143-145 of the General Plan, the Zoning and General Plan Consistency concept is fully explained (See Attachment No . 3) . The Zoning and Land Use Element Consistency Matrix clearly illustrates that the proposed zoning for each parcel is consistent with the General Plan. The matrix depicts Recreation Open Space zoning to be consistent with Low Density Residential and Open Space Land Use Designations . See the area map included in this report for the location of each parcel . Parcel A: The rezone request for Parcel A is from RZ-PD-O-CZ (Medium Density Residential - Planned Development - Oil Production - Coastal Zone) to ROS-O-CZ (Recreation Open Space _ Oil Production - Coastal Zone) , Parcel A is 1 . 64 acres and the General plan Designation is Low Density Residential . The request is consistent with the City' s General Plan. The existing tennis courts are a part of the Seacliff Country Club which is a private recreation facility. Parcel B : The rezone request for Parcel B is from R4-0 (High Density Residential - Oil Production) to ROS-01 (Recreation Open Space - Oil Production) . Parcel B is 2 . 31 acres and the General Plan Designation is Low Density Residential . Since ROS zoning is consistent with the Low Density Residential land use designation, the request is consistent with the General Plan. The future use for the vacant site will be an expansion of the existing golf course which is compatible with existing adjacent recreation and residential uses . Staff Report -4- (3426d) Parcel C• The rezone request for Parcel B is from R4-01-CZ (High Density Residential - Oil Production - Coastal Zone) to ROS-CZ (Recreation Open Space - Coastal Zone) . Parcel C is 1 . 96 acres and the General Plan Designation is Open Space-Recreation. The rezoning will bring the site into complete consistency with the General Plan designation of Open Space - Recreation. The following is a summary of Recreation Open Space acreage : AREA REQUIRED PROVIDED Seacliff Specific Plan 4 . 6 1 . 0 "N" Island 2 . 3 Parcel A 1 . 64 Parcel B 2 . 31 Parcel C (Q Island) 1 . 96 6 . 9 acres 6 . 91 acres The above table illustrates that the applicant has provided ROS zoning which satisfies the requirement of no net loss of ROS zoning in the Seacliff area Summary Pacific Coast Homes has submitted the zone change requests for Parcels A, B, and C in order to satisfy a condition of approval from Zone Change No . 88-9 (Seacliff Specific Plan) and as a condition of approval for Conditional Use Permit No . 90-52 which permits the establishment of the Seacliff Golf Course maintenance facility on Parcel C (Island Q) . Staff supports the rezone requests . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 92-6 with mitigation measures and Zone Change No . 92-1 with the following findings : FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO 92-1 : 1 . The proposed zone change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-O-CZ to ROS-O-CZ, R4-0 to ROS-0, and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ conforms with the Land Use and Coastal Elements of the General Plan. 2 . The proposed zone change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-0-CZ , R4-0 to ROS-0, and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ is consistent with surrounding recreation and residential land uses . Staff Report -5- (3426d) 11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The Planning Commission may deny Zone Change No . 92-1 with findings . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 with responses to written comments 2 . Zoning and General Plan consistency language from the General Plan 3 . Alternative Findings for Denial HS :RLF: ss Staff Report -6- (3426d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L�J0H Lekl INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION H UNTINGTON BEACH TO : Robert L . Franklin Associate Planner FROM: Julie Osugv Assistant p anner SUBJECT : ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NO . 92-6 DATE : April 1 , 1992 Applicant : Pacific Coast Homes Request : A request to amend the zoning on the below referenced parcels from the existing residential zoning designations to a recreational open space zoning designation, as follows : ( 1) Parcel A - an amendment from the existing R2-PD-0-CZ (Medium Density Residential-Planned Development-Oil-Coastal Zone) zoning to ROS-CZ (Recreational Open Space-Coastal Zone) ; (2) Parcel B - an amendment from the existing R4-0 (High Density Residential-Oil) zoning to ROS (Recreational Open Space) ; and (3 ) Parcel C - an amendment from the existing R4-01-CZ (High Density Residential-Oil-Coastal Zone) zoning to ROS (Recreational Open Space) . Parcels A and C of the request are located within the Coastal Zone and therefore a Local Coastal Plan Amendment is part of the request . Location : Three parcels located in the Seacliff Country Club and Golf Course . Parcel A: a 1 . 64 acre parcel located on the north side of Palm Ave . immediately to the west of the Golf Course boundary; Parcel B : a 2 . 31 acre parcel located within the Golf Course along the northeasterly boundary adjacent to proposed Tentative Tract Map No . 14296 ; Parcel C : a 1 . 96 acre parcel located within the boundaries of the Golf Course in the vicinity of the County Club facility. Background The Environmental Assessment Committee (EAC) has reviewed the environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a negative declaration may be filed for the project . In view of this , a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the Huntington Beach Independent for a thirty (30) day public review period commencing Thursday, April 9 , 1992 and ending Friday, May 8 , 1992 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration are received, you will be notified immediately. April 1 , 1992 Page Two Recommendation The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative Declaration No . 92-6 finding that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment . JO : lp ( 2823d) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 92-6 1 . Name of Proponent: Pacific Coast Homes Address: 2124 Main Street, Ste fl200 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone Number: (714) 960-4351 2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: April 1 , 1992 3. Concurrent Entitlement(s) : Zone Change No. 92-1 and Local Coastal Plan Amendment No. 92-2 4. Proiect Location: Three parcels located in the Seacliff Country Club and Golf Course vicinity. Parcel A: a 1 .64 acre parcel located on the north side of Palm Ave. immediately to the west of the Golf Course boundary; Parcel B: a 2.31 acre parcel located within the Golf Course along the northeasterly boundary adjacent to proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 14296; Parcel C: a 1 .96 acre parcel located within the boundaries of the Golf Course in the vicinity of the County Club facility. 5. Project Description: A request to amend the zoning on the above referenced parcels from the existing residential zoning designations to a recreational open space zoning designation, as follows: (1) Parcel A - an amendment from the existing R2-PD-O-CZ (Medium Density Residential - Planned Development-Oil-Coastal Zone) zoning to ROS-CZ (Recreational Open Space-Coastal Zone); (2) Parcel B - an amendment from the existing R4-0 (High Density Residential-Oil ) zoning to ROS (Recreational Open Space) ; and (3) Parcel C - an amendment from the existing R4-01-CZ (High Density Residential-Oil-Coastal Zone) zoning to ROS (Recreational Open Space) . Parcels A and C of the request are located within the Coastal Zone; therefore a Local Coastal Plan Amendment is part of the request. It should also be noted that the Zone Change is being requested to satisfy a condition of approval for previously approved Zone Change No. 88-9. The condition required that 4.60 acres of property be rezoned as open space to replace 4.60 acres of previously zoned open space which was rezoned for residential development. \ ' _ Yes Maybe No ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.) Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ _ X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ _ X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ _ X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards'. X Discussion (a-g) : The proposed project consists strictly of a zone change request and does not constitute any development. Therefore, no earth impacts are anticipated. Subsequent development under the ROS zoning designation would be subject to Use Permit or Conditional Use Permit approval as well as additional environmental review. In audition, the ROS zoning permits a lower intensity of development than is allowed under the existing multi-family residential zoning designations. The ROS designation allows for development of recreational facilities primarily consisting of open landscaped areas in conjunction with minor incidental structures which are compatible with the natural environment. The uses permitable under the ROS zoning emphasize preservation of resources and scenery. As such, subsequent development under the ROS zoning is anticipated to be more compatible with the existing earth conditions on the subject sites and therefore is expected to result in fewer earth movement, compaction, overcovering and topographical impacts. Furthermore, a portion of Parcel B is located within the Alquist Priolo Special Hazards Study Zone boundary. The ROS zoning will preclude potential residential development on this parcel , thereby potentially reducing human exposure to the associated geologic hazard. No significant adverse earth condition impacts are anticipated. For discussion of oil related impacts, please refer to #10 (a,b) discussion. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ _ X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X Environmental Checklist -2- (2817d) `. Yes Maybe No �i C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ X Discussion (a-c): As indicated in the discussion under #1 (a-g) , the proposed zoning will allow for a substantial decrease in the intensity of development subsequently permitted on the parcels. This reduction of development density in turn is anticipated to result in a substantial decrease in projected emissions from the sites compared to emissions which would be generated by development under the existing multi-family zoning designations. In addition, the ROS zoning designation does not permit any activities which would generate objectionable odors or alter local or regional climate. No significant adverse air quality impacts are anticipated. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? _ X i . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X Discussion (a-i ) : As indicated in the discussion under #1 (a-g) , the intent of the ROS designation is to allow for development of recreational facilities primarily consisting of landscaped open space with only minor structures. The zoning emphasizes preservation of resources and scenery. As such, subsequent development under the ROS zoning is anticipated to minimize the introduction of impervious surfaces and runoff, potential impacts to groundwater through extractions or excavation activities, and impacts to public water supplies. In addition, the subject parcels are no located within the fIoodplai.n and do not drain directly into any fresh or marine waters. No significant adverse water impacts are anticipated. A. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X Environmental Checklist -3- (2817d) r ` Yes Maybe No C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X Discussion (a-d): The subject parcels have not been used for agricultural production. The sites have been greatly disturbed due to the golf course and tennis court facilities (which currently occupy parcels A & B) and maintenance facility construction activities (on Parcel C) and do not appear to support any unique or endangered plant or animal species. Some mature trees do border the project sites. However, as previously discussed, under #1 (a-g) , subsequent development under the ROS zoning would be subject to entitlement and additional environmental review. Should any mature trees be removed due to subsequent development, they will be required to be replaced at a 2: 1 ratio pursuant to standard conditions of approval . It should also be noted that permitable uses under the ROS zoning emphasize compatibility with the natural environment and are therefore anticipated to have a minimal impact on any biological resources, should they develop in the area (as compared to the existing multi-family zoning designations) . No significant adverse plant or animal species impacts are anticipated. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ _ X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ X C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X Discussion (a-d) : Please refer to 4 (a-d) discussion. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X Discussion (l ,b) : As indicated in the discussion under #1 (a-g) , the proposed zoning will allow for a substantial decrease in the intensity of development subsequently permitted on the parcels. Recreational uses are of a less intense nature and are used on a periodic basis (as compared to the 24 hour use of residences) . This reduction of development density in turn is reasonably anticipated to result in substantially less noise being generated from the parcels . In addition, subsequent projects will be subject to entitlement and additional environmental review to ensure that project specific noise impacts will not be significant. No significant adverse noise impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist -4- (2817d) �. Yes Maybe Ns 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? _ — X Discussion (l ,b): As indicated in the discussion under #1 (a-g), the proposed zoning will allow for a substantial decrease in the intensity of development subsequently permitted on the parcels. Recreational uses are of a less intense nature and are used on a periodic basis (as compared to the 24 hour use of residences) . This reduction of development density in turn is reasonably anticipated to result in substantially less light and glare being generated from the parcels. In addition, subsequent projects will be subject to entitlement and additional environmental review to ensure that project specific light and glare impacts will not be significant. No significant adverse light and glare impacts are anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Discussion: The proposed project constitutes an alteration to the existing zoning designations on the subject parcels. The proposed zone change if approved, will eliminate the existing multi-family residential zonings and will allow for only recreational uses on the subject sites. However, the subject sites are currently General Planned Recreational Open Space, are primarily occupied by recreational uses and are adjacent to or primarily surrounded by existing recreational uses. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Discussion (a-b) : As indicated in the discussion under #1 (a-g) , the proposed zoning will allow for a substantial decrease in the intensity of development subsequently permitted on the parcels. This reduction of development density in turn is anticipated to result in a substantial decrease in projected natural resource and energy usage from the sites compared to natural resource and energy usage which would be generated by development under the existing multi-family zoning designations. In addition, the ROS zoning designation does not permit any activities which would generate objectionable odors or alter- local or regional climate. No significant adverse air quality impacts are anticipated. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? — _ X Discussion (a,b) : Parcel A has previously been occupied by oil production equipment and facilities. Due to previous oil extraction activities there is a potential for presence of oil contaminated soils, and improperly abandoned equipment/wells on the site. However, as previously noted, the proposed project does not consist of any development and subsequent development would be subject to compliance with state and local site clean-up/well abandonment requirements as required by standard conditions of approval . In addition, due to the open nature and minor structures associated with uses allowed under the ROS zoning it is anticipated that subsequent development under the ROS zoning will expose fewer people to such hazards be more easily able and will to comply with state restrictions requiring maintenance of access to the abandon wells and restrictions regarding development above abandoned wells. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Environmental Checklist -5- (2817d) Yes Maybe N_Q 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ _ X Discussion: The proposed zone change will preclude residential development on the subject parcels. However, the rezone request is being required in an effort to offset prior cumulative losses of open space from previously approved zone changes which allowed for residential development on other sites in the area. In addition, due to the location of the parcels (particularly Parcels B & C) , and current use for recreation facilities (Parcels A & B) it is unlikely that the parcels would develop under the existing zoning. No significant decreases in housing units or population in the area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X Discussion: Please refer to #11 Discussion. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off-site parking? X_ C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ X_ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _X Discussion (a-f) : As previously mentioned, the proposed project does not constitute any development and therefore will not generate any traffic or circulation impacts. It should also be noted that the subject sites are currently occupied by existing recreational , faciliLies or a proposed maintenance facility which are part of the Seacliff Country Club and Golf Course facilities. New development under the ROS zoning would be of substantially lower intensity than what would be permitted under the existing multi-family zoning designations. Permitted uses under the ROS zoning are primarily open space uses with minor structures and therefore, are generally not anticipated to generate significant amounts of traffic. Project specific circulation impacts of subsequent development will be analyzed through the entitlement process. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? — _ X Environmental Checklist -6- (2817d) r Yes Mavbe No f. Other governmental services? _ — X Discussion (a—f): The subject parcels are privately owned and maintained. The zone change and subsequent development under the ROS zoning will not require any additional police, fire, school , park or governmental services to sere the sites. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the development of sources of energy? _ _ X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ X b. Communication systems? X C. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ X e. Storm water drainage? _ X f. Solid waste and disposal? _ X Discussion (a—f) : The zone change and subsequent development under the ROS zoning will not require the installation of any new or additional power, communication, water, sewer, drainage or waste disposal systems to serve the subject parcels. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? — _ X Discussion: The subject parcels do not provide any view opportunities. Subsequent development of the sites under the ROS zoning is anticipated to be less obtrusive than development under the existing multi—family zoning designation and is not anticipated to result in aesthetically offensive view. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Discussion: The proposed zone change will provide recreationally zoned property and will offset the loss of other previously zoned recreational property in the City. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. Environmental Checklist —7— (2817d) l.: Yes Maybe No 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? _ _ X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? _ X Discussion (a-d) : The subject parcels are not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological sites or other cultural resources. No significant adverse impact is anticipated. 21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub- stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the maj,or periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) X C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid- erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Environmental Checklist -8- (2817d) I DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL _ IMPACT REPORT is required. "c;2— Date Sign re Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Environmental Checklist —9— (2817d) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO . 92-6 I . INTRODUCTION This document serves as the Response to Comments on the Draft Negative Declaration No . 92-6 . This document contains all information available in the public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration as of Friday, May 11 , 1992 and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines . This document contains six sections . In addition to this Introduction, these sections are Public Participation and Review, Comments , Responses to Comments , Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration , and Appendix . The Public Participation section outlines the methods the City of Huntington Beach has used to provide public review and solicit input on the Draft Negative Declaration . The Comments section contains those written comments received from agencies , groups , organizations , and individuals as of May 11 , 1992 . The Response to Comments section contains individual responses to each comment . The Errata to the Draft Negative Declaration is provided to show corrections of errors and inconsistencies in the Draft Negative Declaration . It is the intent of the City of Huntington Beach to include this document in the official public record related to the Draft Negative Declaration . Based on the information contained in the public record the decision makers will be provided with an accurate and complete record of all information related to the environmental consequences of the project . II . PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND REVIEW The City of Huntington Beach notified all responsible and interested agencies and interested groups , organizations , and individuals that a Draft Negative Declaration had been prepared for the proposed project . The City also used several methods to solicit input during the review period for the preparation of the Draft Negative Declaration , The following is a list of actions taken during the preparation , distribution, and review of the Draft Negative Declaration . �t 1 . A cover letter and copies of the Draft Negative Declaration were filed with the State Clearinghouse on April 4 , 1992 . The State Clearinghouse assigned Clearinghouse Number 92041010 to the proposed project . A copy of the cover letter and the State Clearinghouse distribution list is available for review and inspection at the City of Huntington Beach, Planning Department , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California 92648 . 2 . An official thirty (30) day public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration was established by the State Clearinghouse . It began on April 6 , 1992 and ended on May 6 , 1992 . However , public notice for the draft Negative Declaration was not published until April 9 , 1992 , therefore public comment letters were accepted by the City of Huntington Beach through May 11 , 1992 . 3 . Notice of the Draft Negative Declaration was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on April 9 , 1992 . Upon request , copies of the document were distributed to agencies , groups , organizations , and individuals . III . COMMENTS Copies of all written comments received as of May 11 , 1992 are contained in Appendix A of this document . All comments have been numbered and are listed on the following pages . All comments from letters received have been retyped verbatim in a comment-response format for clarity . Responses to Comments for each comment which raised an environmental issue are contained in this document . IV . RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The Draft Negative Declaration No . 92-6 was distributed to responsible agencies , interested groups , organizations , and individuals . The report was made available for public review and comment for a period of 30 days . The public review period for the Draft Negative Declaration established by the State Clearinghouse commenced on April 6 , 1992 and expired on May 6 , 1992 . The City of Huntington Beach accepted comment letters through May 11 , 1992 . Copies of all documents received as of May 11, 1992 are contained in Appendix A of this report . Comments have been numbered with responses correspondingly numbered . Responses are presented for each comment which raised a significant environmental issue . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -2- (3285d) Several comments do not address the completeness or adequacy of the Draft Negative Declaration, do not raise significant environmental issues , or request additional information. A substantive response to such comments is not appropriate within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" reference . This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decision makers for their review and consideration . HBEB-1 • Comment : The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Review Board has received and reviewed the above referenced project . This project consists of a code amendment request to amend the zoning on three parcels from the existing residential zoning designations to a recreational open space designation . Response : Comment restates the project description for identification purposes and does not require any response . HBEB-2 : Comment The Board identified the following issue to be corrected in the Draft : #10 Discussion ( a , b) . Parcel A has previously been occupied by oil production equipment and facilities . The discussion should state that if it is determined that these wells have been improperly abandoned , this site should be subject to compliance with state and local site clean-up/well abandonment requirements as required by standard conditions of approval immediately and not postponed to some time uncertain subject to development . Response : The discussion under item 10 ( a , b) incorrectly identifies Parcel A as a location of previous oil production activity. Parcel A is occupied by tennis court facilities and is not occupied any oil production equipment or activities . The discussion should have indicated that Parcel C had been previously used for oil production . The item has been corrected; please refer to HBEB-2 Response on the Errata . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -3- (3285d) In addition, Parcel C was previously approved for use as a golf course maintenance facility under Conditional Use Permit No . 90-52 . Conditions of approval associated with construction of the facility, required abandonment of oil facilities and equipment to meet state and local standards prior to issuance of building permit . The maintenance facility is currently in the process of abandoning of oil facilities to obtain building permits . Therefore, postponement of the abandonment is not of concern . HBEB-3 : Comment : Except for the above comments the Board concurs with Staff ' s Report on 92-15 . If you have any questions or concerns regarding our comments , please contract Patricia McCabe , Chairperson of #92-9 . Response : Comment acknowledged and will be forwarded to decision makers for consideration prior to action on the project . DFG-l : Comment : The California Environmental Quality Act and the California Endangered Species Act require the lead agency to appropriately condition the project and fully implement the statutory mitigation and monitoring requirements to offset adverse impacts to the following resources which may be impacted by this project . Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . DFG-2 • Comment : 1 . Endangered or threatened species of plant and animals . If the project would result in take, on or off project site , of any State-listed species or habitat essential to its continued existence, the applicant must obtain authorization from the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081 . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -4- (3285d) r+ Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . The proposed project will not result in the taking of any endangered or threatened species of plants and animals . Please refer to pages 3 and 4 of the Initial Study Checklist for a discussion of potential biological impacts . The checklist determined that the proposed project will not result in a change in the diversity of species , or number of any species of plants or animals ; the reduction of the numbers of any mature , unique , rare or endangered species , the introduction of new species of plants or animals into the area ; or in the deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat . DFG-3; Comment : 2 . Wetlands . Compliance with the DFG ' s Wetland Policy requires that there should be no net loss of wetland acreage or wetland habitat values , either on or off project site , due to project development . A mitigation and motoring plan subject to DFG approval should be required for loss of sensitive habitats , including , but not necessarily limited to , freshwater marsh, riparian woodland , oak woodland and riparian scrub vegetation . Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . The proposed project will not result in the net loss of wetland acreage or habitat . DFG-4 : Comment : 3 . Watercourses . The DFG opposes the elimination of watercourses and/or their conversion into subsurface drains . All watercourses , whether intermittent or perennial , must be retained and provided with setback buffers appropriate to preserve the riparian and aquatic habitat values . Earthen channels should be interconnected with adjacent large open space areas to increase their effectiveness as wildlife corridors in urban surroundings . The DFG has direct jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code sections 1601-03 in regard to any proposed activities that would divert or obstruct the natural flow or change the bed , channel , or bank of any river , stream, or lake . We recommend early consultation since modification of the Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -5- (3285d) proposed project may be required to avoid impacts to fish and wildlife resources . Formal notification (with fee) under Fish and Game Code Section 1603 should be ;made after all other permits and certifications have been obtained . Work cannot be initiated until a stream bed alteration agreement is executed . Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . The proposed project will not result in the alteration of watercourses , either intermittent or perennial . Please refer to page 3 of the Initial Study Checklist which describes the project site ' s existing drainage . No surface watercourses currently exist onsite . DFG-5 : Comment : 4 . User Fee . The project sponsor is subject to the user fee provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711 . 4 , and the fee is payable to the County Clerk at the time of or prior to filing the Notice of Determination by the lead agency . If a Negative Declaration is filed , the user fee is $1 , 250 . If an Environmental Impact Report is filed , the fee is $850 . It is our assessment that this project will result in cumulative loss of fish and wildlife resources and is not exempt from the user fee . Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . The proposed project will not result in a cumulative loss of fish or wildlife resources . It is not anticipated that a user fee will need to be paid upon filing of the Negative Declaration . DF - Comment : In conclusion , if your analysis reveals that the above-mentioned concerns have been fully addressed throughout your decision-making process , we would not object to the project approval . However , we request that you provide us a copy of the final environmental document immediately upon approval and prior to filing the Notice of Determination . If you have any questions , please contact Mr . Fred Worthley, Regional Manager, Region 5 , Department of Fish and Game, 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50 , Long Beach, California 90802 , telephone (310) 590-5113 . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -6- (3285d) RResponse ; This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . GOPR-1 • Comment : The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments . This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents , pursuant to the California Environmental Quality act . Response ; This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . GOPR-2 ; Comment : Please call Tom Loftus at ( 916 ) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process . When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter , please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly . Response : This comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 - -7- (3285d) 1 V. ERRATA TO DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following changes to the Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study Checklist are as noted below . The changes to the Draft Negative Declaration as they relate to issues contained within this errata sheet do not affect the overall conclusions of the environmental document . The changes are identified by the comment reference . HBEB-2 Response : On page 5 of the Initial Study Checklist , the discussion under item 10 ( a-b) has been revised to read as follows : The Parcel C has previously been occupied by oil production equipment and facilities . Due to previous oil extraction activities there is a potential for presence of oil contaminated soils , and improperly abandoned equipment/wells on the site . However , the subject site has been approved for development of the golf course maintenance facility; development of the facility has been conditioned to abandon oil facilities to comply with state and local site clean-up/well abandonment requirements . In addition, due to the open nature and minor structures associated with uses allowed under the ROS zoning it is anticipated that subsequent development under the ROS zoning will expose fewer people to such hazards be more easily able and will to comply with state restrictions requiring maintenance of access to the abandon wells and restrictions regarding development above abandoned wells . No significant adverse impacts are anticipated . Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -8- (3285d) APPENDIX A Negative Declaration No . 92-6 -9- (3285d) Environmental Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Irt%11%(.f(,Y f)IA(11 Post Office Box 190. . Huntington Beach, California 92648 PECFIV TO : JLJ 1 i e Osug i DATE : Apr- i 1 29 , 1992 APIR Assistant: Planner- Den, .�f FROM : Patricia McCabe , Chair- 92- 15 Subcommi ttee 1 City of Huntington Beach V nv i r-onmenta 1 Hoard SUBJEC 1 Draf t Nega t 1 ve Dec I ar-a t 1 on t`lo . 92---6 Pac I f 1 C (:oas t Home s The City of ►-cuntIngton 13each f_nvIro1lmenLaI Board hac. -e(-ei ed and reviewed the (act Or (, le(- t Th15 p1 t H13E13-1 consi ,its of cJ I (='C]L,f'St_ tO IM(--11(' Lhf' :'r1'. i I1CJ C)Il Lt11 I E:' i• ( E:' ] 'i f I- o(n the eY i s 1. 1 nc] 1 eS 1 (1(?r1 L 1 it ] fI111 '(] f'S 1 <]rlrr L I O I ".� t 1 :t ref: reatIC)naI OOI-11 ' Ie Do t. 1 d P I I t i : !11E f (I 1 i 1 11({ t(1 trr' r I .. 1 l ne DI a f- it 10 D SC U5`•i Ior, 0(7CLJ(l 1 C:d t:, 01 i + (J(1l1C t 1 iil r-(t •11 r,fr.t' aI1(1 f it r ] i , 1(.• dIscUSsInI-I ShotJi ! satP t.!1r3t: 1 ( t- 1 ':i dF-terrn : IIt: (c t'rtt IiBEB-2 these we " 1 r'. tl.Jv(' 1--leer, r, m(,I r);JE't 1 aha1lcforlF-(3 I ( t'! 1 ': °• 1 r E.' should be E,LJb IE''. (. tCl ccin,. e :r : tll Sta LE' ii (1 clean-upr'vie anandori lent C'(tt, l ' t? I'er'tE, as I- e- rwI _ (,y standard conditions of a(,(J, (.)vra l 1_ rr.rned_ 1 i) to ] v alld it postponed to sorne time tin( ei train ,,lb j e c t to c1E�vr . rJ{,rne11`. . Except for the above comments the Hoag d concUrr5 w1 t :ilaf f ' s Report on 92- 15 . IiBEB-3 If you have any questions or (..oncer ns regarding our Comments , please contact , Patricia McCabe , Chairperson of 449P a . cc : Charles Monter-o Arthur Poindexter Roy Richardson STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ' 330 Golden Shore, suite 50 Long Beach, California 90802 (310) 590-5113 Ras E C E.: t V E— D April 29 , 1992 10 M Ms . Julie Osugi City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Ms . Osugi : Negative Declaration 92-6 , Zone Change 92-1 , Local Coast . Pl . Amend . 92-2 , Orange County - SCH 92041010 The California Environmental Quality Act and the California Endangered Species Act require the lead agency to appropriately condition the project and fully implement the statutory DFG-1 mitigation and monitoring requirements to offset adverse impacts to the following resources which may be impacted by this project . 1 . Endangered or threatened species of plants and animals . if the project would result in take , on or off project site , of any State-listed species or habitat essential to its DFG-2 continued existence , the applicant must obtain authorization from the Department of Fish and Game ( DFG) pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2081 . 2 . Wetlands . Compliance with the DFG ' s Wetland Policy requires that there should be no net loss of wet-land acreage or wetland habitat values , either on or off project site, due tc project development . A mitigation and monitoring plan DFG- 3 subject to DFG approval should be required for loss of sensitive habitats including, but not necessarily limited to, freshwater marsh , riparian woodland , oak woodland , and riparian scrub vegetation . 3 . Watercourses . The DFG opposes the elimination of watercourses and/or their conversion into subsurface drains . All watercourses , whether intermittent or perennial , must be retained and provided with setback buffers appropriate to preserve the riparian and aquatic habitat values . Earthen channels should be ' interconnected with adjacent large open DFG-4 space areas to increase their effectiveness as wildlife corridors in urban surroundings . The DFG has direct jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code Sections 1601-1603 in regard to any proposed activities that would divert or obstruct the natural flow or change the bed, channel , or bank of any river, stream, or lake. We recommend ` Ms . Julie Osugi April 29 , 1992 Page Two early consultation since modification of the proposed project may be required to avoid impacts to fish and wildlife resources . DFG-4 Formal notification (with fee) under Fish and Game Code contle Section 1603 should be made after all other permits and certifications have been obtained . Work cannot be initiated until a streambed alteration agreement is executed . 4 . User Fee . The project sponsor is subject to the user fee provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711 . 4 , and the fee is payable to the County Clerk at the time of or prior to filing the Notice of Determination by the lead agency . If a Negative Declaration is filed , the user fee is $1 , 250 . If an DFG-5 Environmental Impact Report is filed, the fee is $850 . It is our assessment that this project will result in cumulative loss of fish and wildlife resources and is not exempt from the user fee . In conclusion, if your analysis reveals that the above-mentioned concerns have been fully addressed throughout your decision-making process , we would not object to the project approval . However, we request that your provide us a copy of the final environmental document immediately upon approval and prior DFG-6 to filing the Notice of Determination . If you have any questions , please contact Ms . Kimberley McKee of our Environmental Services staff at the letterhead address or by telephone at (310) 590-5137 . Sincerely , Fred Worthle /�c Y' Regional Manager Region 5 cc : Office of Planning and Research Environmental Services Division STATE OF CALIFORNIA �•: I PETE WILSON, Governor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 May 06 , 1992 � � JULIE OSUGI CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 Subject : ND 92-6, ZC 92-1 , LCPA 92-2 SCH # 92041010 Dear JULIE OSUGI : The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments . This letter ,OPF acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents , pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act . Please call Tom Loftus at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process . When �Ol,l contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter , please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, Christine Kinne Acting Deputy Director, Permit Assistance i 1 .i i I: i 4� 4.0 ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY i The General Plan has a long-range time frame and details the goals of the community. Zoning, on the other hand, is a single-purpose, short-range tool for implementing the General Plan. Just as it is important that the General Plan reflect the desires of the community, it is equally important that zoning is consistent with the intent of the General Plan. This is a matter of law as well as reason. Section 65860 (a) of the Government Code stipulates, 'County or City zoning ordinances shall be consistent with the General Plan. . ." Consistency between zoning and the General Plan is not as simple as determining exactly which one zoning classification should implement a specific General Plan land use designation. Several zoning classifications may be consistent with a particular land use designation depending on whether they meet the intent of the General Plan. This relationship is necessary so that zoning can implement very specifically the land uses which appropriately reflect the intended character of an area as delineated in the General Plan. A zone is consistent with the General Plan in any specific application if the zone furthers or possesses a measure or signif icant degree of compatibility with the General Plan policies and programs. Determination of consistency is to be made by reference to the policies and programs of all of the elements of the General Plan. 4.1 Zoning Consistency With the Elements of the General Plan In practice, consistency between a zoning proposal and the General Plan will be determined by considering all of the policies and programs of each element of the General Plan and their relationship to the proposed zoning. The Land Use Element policies can be translated into a form suitable for relatively easy analysis of consistency questions. Reference may be made to the Zoning and Land Use Element Matrix (Figure 4-1) to determine which Z ul w Gl O n , Uj Z V I ; t c; t l LAND USE z u Z..� LU IX , ,f at ac Z to rn —+ cn CATEGORIES 0 �, -: AA. r- � '-:-... LU N Q ' � , � r � oZ o _ r g © u u N _� oac QN _ w IDss 0lxu u u Q�tl~SID�I+iTIAI 1.1 ESTATE 1.2 LOW DENSITY 1.3 MEDIUM DENSITY 1.4 MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY f 1.5 HIGH DENSITY t p CQ11?flSAlw: CIAI 2.1GENERAI 2.2OFFICE PROFESSIONAL 2.3MIXED DEVELOPMENT CJl3SII�:IA�. 3.1GENERAL 4 FllS�.�C I�SIr <' 4.1 PUB.,QUASI-PUB.,INSTIT. 000 4.20PEN SPACE ' Q ' AINiNG 13TT5 5.1 PLANNED COMMUNITY 0000 5.2 PLANNING RESERVE O..OTHER 6.1 RESOURCE PRODUCTION Figure 4.1 Conaie4ncv with the land Lee Element HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA ZONING AND LAND USE ELEMENT �i may also be determined by reference to PLANNING DIVISION size andd(-Ationat criteria. CONSISTENCY MATRIX•. - c✓o w' zoning classifications are clearly consistent with which land use designations. If a zone is not shown as clearly consistent with a particular land use designation, reference may be made to the size criteria for determining land use designations (Figure 3- 15). If the size criteria therein do not disallow the possibility of a finding of consistency, then a finding of consistency between the zone and the Land Use Element may be made by reference to the locational criteria contained in the Land Use Element. Reference to the size criteria in Figure 3- 15 will not be made when making a finding of consistency in the City's coastal zone. Unlike the Land Use Element policies, the policies of the other elements of the General Plan are not easily or into matrix form. Consequently determination of consistency must be made through a policy by policy analysis of each element. Finding of Consistency A finding of consistency may only be made after analysis of the proposed zoning in terms of all nine elements of the General Plan. A finding of consistency with only one of the elements, such as the Land Use Element, is not sufficient for a finding of consistency with the General Plan. After considering all nine elements, a finding of consistency with the General Plan may be made for the zoning proposal in question if it can be shown to further or possess a measure or significant degree of compatibility with the General Plan policies and programs. 145 �f ATTACHMENT NO, 3 ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR DENIAL ZONE CHANGE N0, 92-1 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE N0, 92-1 : 1 . The proposed zone change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-O-CZ, R4-0 to ROS-0, and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ will not conform with the Land Use and Coastal Elements of the General Plan. 2 . The proposed zone change of three (3) parcels from R2-PD-0-CZ to ROS-O-CZ , R4-0 to ROS-0, and R4-01-CZ to ROS-01-CZ is not consistent with surrounding recreation and residential land uses . (3426d-8) i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-1/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-6 (Rezone three [31 parcels to Recreation Open Space) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 20, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Zone Change No. 92-1/Negative Declaration No. 92-6 APPLICANT: Pacific Coast Homes LOCATION: Parcel A - North side of Palm Avenue approximately 100 feet southeast of Cherry Hill Lane. Parcel B - Approximately 500 feet west of the terminius of Clay Avenue. Parcel C - Approximately 500 feet north of the intersection of Ofelin Lane and Morning Tide Drive. (See Attached Map) REOUEST: Rezone three (3) parcels: Parcel A - From R2-PD-0-CZ (Medium Density Residential) to ROS-O-CZ (Recreation Open Space) Parcel B - From R4-0 (High Density Residential) to ROS-0 (Recreation Open Space) Parcel C - From R4-01-CZ (High Density Residential) to ROS-01-CZ (Recreation Open Space) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No. 92-6 COASTAL STATUS: Zone Change No. 92-1 will result in an amendment to the City' s Local Coastal Program. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. Connie Brockway City Clerk (3807d) ROS-0 IM2 01 CD R4-OI c— RI �•:__ ,•• r'' C(..,:.. .ri, `—.�"ti: ,. t - I -Lt n;�co RI -t� '�' •' RI ���'' "ZyR4-C1.I.k Rl UI �� B RI Rl :t ROS-O /1F/ RI F RI �p RI r OP-OI C17 RI 0 'o,C• •�C? ••.•r, R4 01 RI Rl Rl o Rz•Po o'cz 1 \R4-01`\, :'R2•PDOCZIJ u.t... o ,.. r' •.;/.��:��• _ RI Rz�-PD- -CZ ROS-O-CZ \/atc � t RS- o o - 4� . ..� 101 RI RI-0 RI\L`=•' R1-O "•' i 0\ ,,/�'••�y. V mac/ �s`�:�.—a o�•I e R /..n i �: RI-0 •a: �� � a .opt y� �� ��• A.�7�: p. �' '�•� �..1.. .... -0 RI.O ZC 92-1 Jj HUNTINCTON BEACH HUNTWGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION APN: O23-361-36 �A APN 023 361 37|��'�� 4�- ARN:~��3-181-25 � '` : - - _' . Huntington Beach Co Seacliff On The Greens Community A . Estate Series of Seacliff Homeowns Property Tax Div P.O. Box 7611 96 Corporate Park No. 300 Cayman Development 608 Silver Spur San Francisco CA94120 Irvine CA92714 Rolling H90274 APN: 023-361-38 APN: 023-361-39 APN: 023-361-41 E Seaclipff"I.-Iomeownen Estate SeacIiff Homeowner S Greens Community A` C opment 608 Silver Spur Ca opment 608 Silver Spur 96 Cc orate Park No. 300 Ro�lj�.) H90274 RoIIi in,g H90274 In Ine CA92714 . APN: 023-361-42 APN 1 2 APN: 110-200-32 ^ E Seacliff Homeowne- ach Co Pacific Coast Homes C lopment 6O8 Silver Spur P O 7611 �� 0� P.O. Box 7611 ' RxAT~�og H90274 CA94120 San Francisco CA94120 , ' - APN: 110-200-34 APN: 023-263-09 APN: 023-263-10 � HuntingtonRobert D. Dawson Lawrence D. Schley P.O. 611 ��\�Y 6691 Harbor Key Circle 6692 Harbor Key Circle S�5Francisco CA94120 Huntingtn Bch CA92648-2117 Huntingtn Bch CA92648-2117 10 APN: 023-263-08 APN: 023-263-11 APN: 023-263-07 10 Michael J. Mokler Pauline M. Cooper Gary B. Dahl 6701 Harbor Key Circle P.O. Box 723 6721 Harbor Key Circle Huntington Beach CA92648-2117 Huntingtn Bch CA92648 Huntington Beach CA92648-2117 *a APN: 023-263-06 APN 023 221 2 APN: 023-221-19 �w David T. Fennell H h Co Joseph B. Hennenfent 6472 Doral Dr. P.D. 7611 ��� 19761 Island Bay Lane Huntington Beach CA92648 ��r�Francisco CA9412O Huntington Beach CA92648-2603 ,� APN: 023-221-21 APN: 023-221-18 APN: 023-221-22 ~� Ervin W. Miller David F. Cox John R. Hart 19782 Island Bay Lane 19771 Island Bay Lane 19772 Island Bay Lane Auntingtn Bch CA92648-2603 Huntington Beach CA92648-2603 Huntingtn Bch CA92648-2603 NJ NPN: 023-221-17 APNc 0 2 35 APN: O23-221-16 m� N /drey Lee Kreitz r Mildred E. French i9781 Island Bay Lane Trail 7-2-07105-0 P.O. Box 19801 Island Bay Lane funt` ngton Beach CA92648-2603 L'~~~Ange9OO54 Huntington Beach CA92648-2603 'TA - - 11 nPN:: a?.<:...)• R..R:..I.....R:.r4 AP Na 023...•221...•25 F1PN:: 023...•221...'26 Rober"1. 0.. Ennen j Joseph A. Capr':i.ca't.'t.:i. Richard L. Fenx:1. 19802 :I:=.::•:Land Bay Lane 1 :19812 Island Bay Lane 19822 Island Day Lane F Huntington Beach (::r-1926 48 -2603 Huntington Beach h (:;Fl926 4f:3••••2603 Huntington Beach T::Fl926 48 -260,3)r 11 (1PN s 02 +••••::'.Fr;:i••'•0:1. 11PN:: 023-••263-••02 F1F'N z 0R'.:i•••'R:'.fr,i-03 James L_ta►.t:i.s I''It::F:::a.h<'aney Paul H. j ac::l':le Dorothy K. I'•ec:kr'ca't•.'te 500 Main St.. 6702 Lawn Haven Dr.. 61.32 f::aag:Lec:ress't. Dr'., 1 El ::,':1 r. ., L•un•t::i.ncl't'.n Bch (::Fl�i)�.'6 4f:3....;�:'1 40 I••Ic.n t.:i.ng t.n Bch (::F1ti';�:6 4t:3 Segundo ��rl�f)R;.rY,.l F1PI'••I:: 023...•263-0/4 (1PN:: 023...•263-05 (1F'N:: 023....231....:1 6 David Sammons L_e<ac:he Barbara Kr'uly Myron S. Howard d 6722 Lawn Haven Dr'.. 6732 L..<'awnh<aven Dr'., 655:1. Morning T':i.cle Dr. Huntington Beach ac:h 1::F1926 4;:3••••::'.:1.40 Huntington Beach (::Fl926 4T:3....F'.L40 I••lu.n t i.ng t-n Bch I:(t926 4f:3....2604 f1PH:: 023....23:I.....:I."l" (1PN a 023••-•231....:1 0, ('iPN:: 023....231....:1 9 Lee N. Stewtor..t. K. Dale Bush Rober..t. B. F:I.em:i.ncl 656 1 Morning Tide Dr., 6581 Morning Tide Dr,, 6591 Morning Tide Dr'.. l..lun-t.:i.n g to Bch (:::A926 4t:3....2604 Huntington Beach (::F1926 4 :3....260 4 Huntington ton Beach h t:f>I926 4:i3....26011 APNg 2 ) ;' } 1 R f.' FlF•N:: 023....231.. 2:1. A1'•'N a 023....231...22 Bruce R. Lively Huntington ET. - .. ...ct�- :' :. : ... I I.co 61:1. 66f):1. Morning Tide Dr., P.O.P.O.P.O. B - e�761:1. � V,,,0.. I�'�- � Huntington Beach (:.FI��R:'.tir/4f:3 ::'. rf)!:> :i3Ea' rranc::i.<s>cca (::r1r�r4:LR:'.f) �:>' Or'�anc:::i.ss>co (:;A9 4120 F1PI,I.. f)F:.,.Y.....:.,.l.I." F:.•..) API-I., )R:.,.)...R:...r.I.....R:.. AP Nu I.. 723....23.I.....25 t:•eor'cle E. Harris Raymond 0.. Durda Richard W. L..:i.ngcaa';e 6::.4:1. Morning Tide Dr,, frfrf. 1 Morning Tide Dr'., 6671 Morning Tide Dr.. i Huntington Beach t (19R:'.6 4f:3....:t:'.606 Huntington Beach f fl926 4;:3...•2606 Huntington Beach h t::rl926 41i3••-2606 APNu ..>:' 3 '' 3• - 2 FiPN:: 0:':'.::"r....;:'31.,.•::'.•7 A N c. 0.�:'.::i....:1.(:3:I....36 I•'I1_u-;'t.:i.nclt.c;" -:r0:*-,c:1'i cca Alvin J. Broussard I"1un't.:i.nC :.eac:h Ca � W �i2 S t . F'.,(:1.. : .,x %f.>:L:I. frya.:I. fY(car•n:i.nca 'T':i.rfcr Dr., R:.F:.,y •: .Isst.� <:'. 'S�-. F:'r'�anc::i.<.sc:ca t:A9,4:120 Huntington r:c[:;•<'ach [:;Fl�i�;�:'.6 4;:3••••::608 S- F-r'�i.nt:::i.ssrc; (:;A19/4:120 AF'I',I:: r 2::i....<:'.2:I....07 F1PN s 023....22:1... 06 ftF'N:: 0 :3-...:' .'.:1.....08 J. Riley Fowler Michael C. Adams Robert ,.,.. J.. ...{::'is V i•::'...I.t•::' 19762 Sea Canyon Circle 19771 Sea Canyon Circle 19772 C c a Canyon Circle . j . 1 i t ! l CA92648-2622 Huntington Beach : x : ( 8 . < , r Huntington Beach 192 6 r } .R i F F � APN: 023-211-05 "n,: . . . .' ' 'Al T. Chittick Robert D. Shaft Lucy K. Lee 19781 Sea Canyon Circle 19811 Sea Canyon Circle 19821 Sea Canyon Circle � Huntingtn Bch CA92648-2622 Huntington Beach CA92648-2622 Huntington Beach CA92648-2622 N8 APN: 023-221-02 APN: 023-221-01 APN: 023-361-07 Ray K. Shackleford Robert E. Borns Constantino Salios 19831 Sea Canyon Circle 19841 Sea Canyon Circle 6262 Turnberry Circle D� Huntington Beach CA92648-2622 Huntington Beach CA92648-2622 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 " APN: 023-361-28 APN: 023-361-08 APN: 023-361-27 Gary L. May David L. Matlock Laddijohn R. Frisinger 7904 E. Saunas Ct. 6272 Turnberry Center 6281 Turnberry Circle r Orange CA92669 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 APN: 023-361-09 APN: 023-361-26 APN: 023-361-10 Hosakere Ananth Alex Cetin Douglas I . Tambara 6282 Turnberry Circle 7122 Sunlight 6292 Turnberry Circle Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92647 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 - , W° APN: 023-361-25 APN: 023-361-11 APN: 023-361-24 Richard M. Geosano Raymond V. Kendrick Roger L. McClellan 6301 Turnberry Circle 6302 Turnberry Circle 6311 Turnberry Circle ^ Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 � APN: 023-361-12 APN: 023-361-23 APN: 023-361-13 James E. Darling William C. Haggerty Merrill G. Barnes ' 8312 Turnberry Circle 6321 Turnberry Circle 6322 Turnberry m, Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 � APN: 023-361-14 APN: 023-361-22 APN: 023-361-15 Gene Tawa Jon Thomas Weakly Ali Cetin 6332 Turnberry Circle 6341 Turnberry Dr. 6342 Turnberry Circle m, Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 � APN: 023-361-21 APN: 023-361-16 APN: 023-361-20 Everard J. Korthals Charles L. Krebs Thomas J. Bialek 6351 Turnberry Dr. 6352 Turnberry Circle 6361 Turnberry Circle � Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 Huntington Beach CA92648-5501 AF='N:: 02;;...::}61.....:L7 F1f'hl:: 0,.,.)....;:'sf.;:L... :Lt) fll'II:: C);:'.;:i.... :if;a•...':L#:3 M Jc)(:' I..... C'c)'i>'la 'T(.(rrril)r?r•ry C::i.r-c:'.1.e :1.6 El,14:1. lYliar-:i.riia. )stagy/ Dr.. 6*,.:)'72 Tur•nbc:?r•r•y f.;:i.rc:1.c;? I--I(. n-ti.n(;l-k.on I•'lun-l:a.11(.1-ton rsc:?,ac:l•) CIA-926,49 FIur•t•l.:i.ncl•l.r.)ri B(-.-?<ac:l•i (',(.) 'A:6,'b#:3 550.I. O:':'::';...•;:i 0�:'.;:i...:.`ir�;:l.....()�:: (lPN:: U::''*,`....:"6:1:....():`3 • �Ji:vi ec:.i C.'ca(:liar- Wia l kc?r• �Jc)I-)n C•;.. Ionc.O.:I.:i. })iav:i.cl 19`19:5 I.-trio•:•? :i00 Cor poria.t•.c:? f'c:):i.n l.c:? No.. "`SPO0 :1.961;3 Wc)c)c.►'U.-incls:> L..ianr•.? Fluri•t::i.rig-Lon Xsc:iac:l-1 C%O9'A'.f;tl•#:3....;:i 02 1: (:)x F'I:i.a,a. s CA I'lun•t•.:i.n(;l-l.rni 02:: ;ice *.1.•'•'{)/d Ftl•I�1: OR:`.;:i ';:iF.;:l. �4;:i (il'hl:: ()R';:i ::iF;:l. <)f; '� I i'a iJ iarll(•:•?'.:i A.. Uiar•n(:?r• Davicl C[:)c:)I:)er ltc(oc:l:liaricls :1.96*,:i;:5 Woocl:li:trich:: I...tan(:? 196/1`5 Wc:)c:)cl:lianc:ls L..ianc:? 1-1(.u•i•�:.a.ncl•k.r.)n Ts(•:?<:,.c::l•i (:;��t?::'.l;�t#:3--;:�;:�1.):<:'. I-I[.[r)•t::i.n(�•kc)ri 3:'sc•:?i:i(::I•► 1::F1�i�:�';>�3#:3....;:�;:�r)�:'. .1':. : �:• .:: • t• •., ���: ....;`.�:5�)R?I••I�_cri•t.:i.nc �Oii ):?sc;.<tr I) (:;F'i7.:.e�; Yc.3 ="� �polor�y (�'-c►�� � ��z�r�R�-fc,�{-'I (�erruPfG+ ff•2k-+u�iu c.lGG�e�� L,�,ry�c� •�(G>Lc��•ey r -2-0-7(09-0 k �I'�i & Pr 6,70 GOWO " o 0-7be SAe)za A-"reK Gt C- q2&f6 y �eGe 5 ctt- R'Cn��-4 02?j- 3�-43 �ac�-�-cG Coal"?-�o►�eS��e earl 4-,Tr t �lr ?, o l%3y C,r��u.���1. � Z '�'�`"A A Gi7�Pe6 4" Connie Brockway,City Clerk e City of Huntington Beach `' Office of the City Clerk IUL 9 r!2 z ' ~r i _°'� P.O.BOX 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ' of Itl (i •`::'r....�:i6 1.....;57,3Y�j I::.?ii'�.1i1'�.(:? t7E7'I":I.t'�:> c}.f' �:Yf':acA.J..f:f` 1• c:}Wr N3 'x)c've?:.c;p(nei l'. ECG#:3 c:i:i.:l.vc:�r �) (`�,��NtINCTpy A ' ppUN T Y CPS. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway,City Clerk - City of Huntington Beach Office of the `City Clerk �r• :•�.,i 4 �;,; �•. .. .. � '� P.O. Box 190 . L ]�` /� e{ :1�� Huntington Bea Hun Beach,CA 926481� ,' JUL 9 IL QpQ 7 k44F�-O Zc� c �Z• , G7 (7 �%%NTIN6j0y ::i{{?1:Y{:::I.:1.'�"Y' (.)1'1 Y I'7{:? (:il"c:�e:�l'�<.:> C;t:�mrnt.�n:i. l.y nrVI � O� =MCORIOB��FO 96 o -_. __ 9 :I:1^ti':i.rie (�(lti',c:7:I.�I p �'.nmr�n So C9 c�NN T Y CP�� LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING . --..�.. -.__ .- --'•-•-•- ,,.., I I I I I I I I I I��11 1�1 I I I�I I I I I I I I'11 11�'l 1 I 111(I 1 1 1 1 I 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-1/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-6 (Rezone three [3] parcels to Recreation Open Space) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, July 20, 1992, 7:00 PM APPLICATIONNUM__B_E_R: Zone Change No. 92-1/Negative Declaration No. 92-6 APPLICANT: Pacific Coast Homes LOCATION: Parcel A' - North side of Palm Avenue approximately 100 feet southeast of Cherry Hill Lane. Parcel B - Approximately 500 feet west of the terminius of Clay Avenue. Parcel C - Approximately 500 feet north of the intersection of"Ofelin Lane and Morning Tide Drive. (See Attached Map) , REQUEST: Rezone three (3) parcels: Parcel A - From R2-PD-O-CZ (Medium Density Residential) to ROS-O-CZ (Recreation Open Space) Parcel B - From R4-0-0 gh Density Residential) to ROS-O (Recreation Open•.ISpace) Parcel C - From R4=01-CZ (High Density Residential) to ROS-OI-CZ (Recreation Open Space) ENVIRONMENT STATUS: Covered by Negative Declaration No. 92-6 COASTAL STATUS: Zone Change No. 92-1 will result in an amendment to the City's Local Coastal Program. QN-EIIA: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public.. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the •application as outlined above. Connie Brockway City Clerk µ� OS Oq M2-01-CDJ — 5, .• �'Q^�t_ '�s �_`,T't`��_L[.E� +�•— Ri"-z'�y "'- .co Rl+ 1 r•J 'n�S,e- `..�cRc,:S, s:.- i.f'/"`, RI ' RI `-n C B ✓III L nv �;.� f J• ...... _�'ROJ"l' r��I•�(• RI i PI •e , .iC VI r � RI "�...• � .`� ,/�9N' .+,err :S IRI.O 1I ROS - lRl RI ` RI II •I �. 4 qa`q�j RI I 5 n R � :OPd• 3 Yam:':•�:�` `�• :/:• 1 ,Cr i�/f �!•' \ .RI RI RI/ +k' ..0 C2 F � h ^�:�.�L RI RI•ylPb a •7e�.33Rz.00 o cz� ` '.1.... - ROS-O °q_ . R?ro-•R C ii/% r�. RI-0 .: .a• ROS-0-CZ .•y"c ''�i.:`_: ac. C''�_'=•R p '/' •e' • RI.O ZC 92-1 �. "U WGTON,NO1 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. 1 am a principal cleric of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of Cafomia, and that attached Notice is a true and ti complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaperto wit the issue(s) of: July 9, 1992 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is tnie and corned. Executed on July 9 , 199 2 at Costa Mesa, California Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION a..� 0