HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing - Zone Change 92-3 - Negative Declaration 92- STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Tuesday, September 7, 1993
A videotape recording of this meeting is
on file in the City Clerk' s Office.
Mayor Winchell called the regular meetings of the City Council and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7 p.m.
PRESENT: Robitaille, Bauer, Moulton-Patterson, Winchell , Leipzig, Silva
ABSENT: Sullivan
(City Council) PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3 - NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NO. 92-34 (REZONE FROM TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN TO OFFICE PROFESSIONAL) - 309 &
311 17TH STREET - APPROVED AS AMENDED (450.20)
The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to
consider the following:
SUBJECT: Zone Change No. 92-3/Negative Declaration No. 92-34
APPLICANT: Jack H. Ellsworth
LOCATION: 309 and 311 - 17th Street
ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan-Section B
RE UEST: A zone change of an approximately 5,875 square foot area from TLSP-B
(Townlot Specific Plan-Section B) to OP (Office Professional)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 92-34 was advertised for a
twenty-one (21) day public comment period which began on May 13, 1993 and
closed on June 2, 1993.
COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable
A motion was made by Silva, seconded by Bauer, to approve Negative
Declaration No. 93-34 as amended to include a second mitigation measure that
prior to the issuance of any building permits a public hearing shall be
conducted to assure compliance with the city's Ordinance Code as follows:
Mitigation Measures for Negative Declaration No. 92-34
Page 2 — Statement of Action — 9/7/93
Impact:
Subsequent development of the site under the proposed C2 (Community Business)
zoning may potentially result in noise, light and glare and other
compatibility impacts to adjacent residential units.
Mitigation:
1 . Subsequent development of the site, under the C2 zoning, shall be subject
to preparation of an initial study to analyze the potential environmental
impacts of specific development of the site. The initial study shall be
prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and shall be processed prior to or concurrently with
entitlement processing.
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits a public hearing shall be
conducted to assure compliance with the city' s Ordinance Code.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bauer, Moulton—Patterson, Winchell , Silva, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sullivan, Robitaille (out of room)
A motion was made by Silva, seconded by Bauer, to approve Zone Change
No. 92-3 for C-2 (Community Business) zoning as requested by the applicant
with findings as amended and after reading by title approve introduction of
Ordinance No. 3211—B — "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE CHANGE OF
ZONING FROM THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF TLSP—B (TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN
SECTION B) TO C2 (COMMUNITY BUSINESS) ON REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH
OF ORANGE AVENUE, EAST OF 18TH STREET, NORTH OF OLIVE AVENUE AND WEST OF
17TH STREET; ZONE CHANGE 92-3 AND NEGATIVEOECLARATION 92-34."
Findings for Approval — Zone Change No. 92-3
1 . Although the proposed zone change from TLSP—B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to Community Business (C2) does conform with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed zone change from TLSP—B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to
Community Business (C2) is consistent with surrounding commercial land
uses to the south.
The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bauer, Moulton—Patterson, Silva, Leipzig
NOES: Winchell
ABSENT: Sullivan, Robitaille (out of room)
Page 3 - Statement of Action - 9/7/93
Mayor Winchell adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach to 4:30 p.m. , on Monday, September 13, 1993, in the Fourth
Floor Conference Room, Civic Center, Huntington Beach, California.
/s/ Connie Brockway
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
ATTEST:
/s/ Connie Brockway /s/ Grace Winchell
City Clerk Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
County of Orange ) ss:
City of Huntington Beach)
I, Connie Brockway, the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of
Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at
their regular meeting held on the 7th day of September, 1993.
Witness my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the
25th day of October, 1993.
/s/ Connie Brockway
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
By d.
Deputy
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONE CHANGE NO.92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.92-34
(Rezone from Townlot Specific Plan to Office Professional))
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at
the Huntington Beach Civic Center,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California,on the date and at the time indicated
below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE/TIME: Tuesday, September 7, 1993, 7:00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: ZONE CHANGE NO.92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.92-34
APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Jack H.Ellsworth
LOCATION: 309 and 311 - 17th Street
ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan-Section B
REQUEST: A zone change of an approximately 5,875 square foot area from TLSP-B(Townlot Specific Plan-
Section B)to OP(Office Professional)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No.92-34 was advertised for a twenty-one(21)day public
comment period which began on May 13, 1993 and closed on June 2, 1993.
COASTAL STATUS: Not Applicable
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,
2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,or inspection by the public. A
copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall after September
3, 1993.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit to the City Clerk,written
evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera,
Assistant Planner at 536-5271.
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
(714)536-5227
(phzc923)
Connie Brockway,City Clerk _....,..w v -_.�..,_. . .:._:_.,. ,__.......,..
GTVV c t ki�:•,
City of Huntington Beach ��r of 1. V S.Kj ST;.U'`"' =i •
Office of the City Clerk ' s
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ':,a z�?I C L A f ' CA L
r
023-162-24
Scott R. Baugh
3400 Avenue of the Stars —
INGTpy Unit -321 ,j s
-Costa Mesa, CA 92626
�Q_`M60XYOB4lrO
� rt QZ 1?W4fiprNG GRO Q�RE SF=.
`Fe ISO F� c�Q €R XPtfl � •
ppUNTY `\
LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEART -
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
September 17, 1992
Mr. Jack Ellsworth
311 17th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Ellsworth:
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held
Tuesday, September 7, 1992, conditionally approved your application for
Negative Declaration No. 92-34 and approved Zone Change No. 92-3.
This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you
have ninety days from September 17, 1992, to apply to the courts for judicial
review.
A Statement of Council Action will be mailed to you together with the
conditions of approval.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at
536-5227.
Sincerely yours,
Connie Brockway, CMC
City Clerk
CB:cc
Enclosure
CC: City Administrator
City Attorney
Community Development Director
1051 K
(Telephone:714-536-5227)
MITIGATION MEASURES FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
Impact:
Subsequent development of the site under the proposed C2 (Community
Business) zoning may potentially result in noise, light and glare and
other compatibility impacts to adjacent residential units.
Mitigation•
1 . Subsequent development of the site, under the C2 zoning, shall be subject
to preparation of an initial study to analyze the potential environmental
impacts of specific development of the site. The initial study shall be
prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall be processed prior to or
concurrently with entitlement processing.
2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits a public hearing shall be
conducted to assure compliance with the City' s Ordinance Code.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3:
1 . Although the proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to Community Business (C2) does conform with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to
Community Business (C2) is consistent with surrounding commercial land
uses to the south.
Title 1 •WRIT OF MANDATE §C4.6
exhibits, all rejected exhibits in the possession of the local agency or .
its commission, board, officer, or agent, all written evidence, and_any
other papers in the case.
W) If the petitioner files a request for the record as specified in
snhttivision (c) within 10 hays ;►f(er 1he fills• the decision becomes fi-
nal as provided in subdivision (b), (it(- time within which a petition
pursuant to Section 109.1.5 in,ty he filed shnil he extended to not later
than the 30th day following the date on which the record is cither
personally delivered or mailed to the petitioner or his attorney of rec-
ord, if he has one.
(e) As used in this section, decision means adjudicatory admin-
istrative decision made, after hearing, suspending, demoting, or dis-
missing an officer or employee, revoking or denying an application
for a permit or a license, or denying an application for any retire-
ment benefit or allowance.
(f) In making a final decision as defined in subdivision (e), the
local agency shall provide notice to the party that the time within
which judicial review must be sought is governed by this section.
As used in this subdivision, "party" means an officer or em-
ployee who has been suspended, demoted i or dismissed; a person
whose permit or license has been revoked or whose application for a
permit or license has been denied; or a person whose application for
a retirement benefit or allowance has been denied.
(g) This section shall be applicable in a local agency only if the
governing board thereof adopts an ordinance or resolution making this
section applicable. If such ordinance or resolution is adopted, the
provisions of this section shall prevail over any conflicting provision
in any otherwise applicable law relating to the subject matter.
(Added by Stats.1976, c.276,p. 581, § 1.)
Forms
See Wei;04 Valiforuin Code Forme, Civil Procedure.
Library References
Adnflo4trutive Lrtw mul Prove-lure C.J.S. Public Administrative BoJiea and
C-7=. Procedure
Notes of Declslons
In general I that imblir empinvntcnt relittlonx bwn•d
Exhaustion of administrative remedies 2 Inul exi-In-ive jurimlietion to dctermine
whether the unfair pructice charger wore
1118tified: 111111. in vices of tearherx' failure
to erhtuta their nolntiniatrative remedicx
I. In general ranter Ihr Hod-la Ael, trial court erred in
Sehnol hot:rd'M vuihtlerttl freezing of granting writ of mnudute to cotnpcl xnper-
I.aeh�:r.' Mnhtries after brginniiig of nt:w intt:ndenl of dintriel and otherm to ruime
.40mid yenr, while r•mlrnel nvgotiwionx of eertnin teachers. Atnndor Vul-
were pending, nrguuhly wnm nn uufuir I--% t•r'uuhtry I:11uentor4 A.rv'u t. Newlin
pructicv ill viululiuu of the Itoddit Art no (1970) 151 Cul.Iiptr. 724, M C.A.3,1 :Z).
675
§ 1094.5 SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS Part 3
Note 378
n.rnuled for tw%v Irial Ie anal... Pri—m—od t. tninva r.unl. [,:.:iouer had loss, juri..lirlinn
t'ulifornin 1'urmttlaYint•tit Ilts. .%viw:ils ltd. and did not drlcrnlloe nu•ritx. \\'extern Air
(1:17,41) 1''7 Cal.nptr. RIU• ra t'.A.3d 29. I,invot lac, v. Sobiritki (11161) 12 Cnl.ltptr.
Trial courl'm jutlgalrut d.ny ing writ of I111, 1111 C.A.'_'d 309.
nrnndnte to compel dirrctar .tf ngrivultnru Irurl that. letter discharging; mcnior tylt-
to met nmide his det-Mon rrvakiug lwtiiinn• Ist vivrk in office of enunty clerk stated
er's lirrnme am aircraft Irihrl in hnxnlrsm al that sill. tc:lx guilty of nliscoaduct in re-
pest control wnm revrrxrd and cnxtt re rnocing public rreords from tin files and
lllnlldrtl to trial vourt with dirvetiullx to Inutihlling all.l mrcretinc theln on vnrloum
renlnnd ramp it) dirrrtnr fur purpose of fluter. wherenm in horarih(; before county
1 ret-onmideriug the penally lrrl.viously im- civil st•rvice entatnissiun evitlenve wait in•
posed, where it wns found tint home of traduced only am to what took place on
thu charges against. pctitiont•r worn not ono of the dater, did oat require the dix-
mnpported by evidence. Wingfield v. trict canrt of appeal on nl.pral frnnt judg-
Directnr of Atriculture (1072) 11►5 Cal. nient nwardiug; mt•aior typist clerk writ of
Rptr.019,20 C.A.3d 209. inandatr, after reversing tl:o judgment of
Proceeding for review of denial by cons- the superior court, to rcntanrl the matter
mixsloner of corporations of ltcnnit to to the c.•nunisxibn for rt•••onsideration,
t•hntlge voting rights of sharehold.•ra where tlu rr wax n siuiilnrity tit facts sue•
would be rctnnndetl to superior court for rvtunding rentavnl of the dacuntenls un all
of the dalt•s. Pratt v. l.nm Angelrs Colin-
dal evidence whether there wax suhstntl' ty Civil ti.-rvier. Cointnissiuu (1952) 238
tint evidence to support aanuniseiullur's 1':.td'3,1(IS C.A:?d 11.1.
fiudings, where court improperly deter-
1094.6. Judicial review; decisions of local agencies; petition;
filing; time; record; decision and Marty defined; or-
dinance or resolution
(a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agency, other than
school district, as the term local agency is defined in Section 54951 of
the Government Code, or of any commission, boards officer or agent
tile. *eof, may be had pursuant to Section 1094:5 of this code only if
i. the petition for writ:of mandate pursuant to such section is filed
-'a:,ithin the time limits specified in this section.
(b) Any such petition shall be filed not later than the 90th day
following the date on which the decision becomes final. If there is no
provision for reconsideration of the decision in any applicable provi-
sion of any statute, charter, or rule, for the purposes of this section,
the decisi�;h is final on the date it is made. If there is such provision
for reconsideration, the decision is final for the purposes of this sec-
tion upon the expiration of the period during which such reconsidera-
lion can be sought; provided, that if reconsideration is sought pursu-
ant to any such provision the decision is final for the purposes of this
,ection on the date that reconsideration is rejected.
(c) The complete record of then proveedings, shall Ix, prepared by
the I(x.al agency or its t (nlusli,�;i+1n, board, clffil'er, (w agent whit-h
made the decision and shall be doliverc(I to tlic petitiona.-r within 90
bays sifter he has filed a written request therefor. The local agency
may recover from the petitioner its actual costs for transcribing or
otherwise preparing the record. Such record shall include the tran-
Script of the proceedings, all pleadings, all notices and orders, any
proposed decision by a hearing officer, the filial decision, all admitted
674
` ,
I '
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
County.of Orange )
ove-1- be
I am a Citizen of the United States and a �
resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen years, and not a PUBLIC NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL srA-
TUS: Negative Declaration
party to or interested in the below NOTICE OF No. 92-34 was advertised.'
i clerk of PUBLIC HEARING for public
(21) day
entitled matter. I am a principalZONE CHANGE which
comment
Mayri13,
NO.92-3/ 1993 and closed on June
the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a NEGATIVE 2,1993.
newspaper of general circulation printed DECLARATION COASTAL STATUS: Not
, N0.92.34 Applicable
(Rezone from ON FILE: A copy of the
and published in the City of Huntington Townlot Specific proposed request is on file
Plan to Office in the Community Develop-
Beach County of Orange State of ) ment Department, 2000
I Professional Main Street, Huntington
NOTICE IS HEREBY Beach, California 92648,
California, and that attached Notice is a GIVEN that the Huntington
Beach City Council will for inspection by the pub-
true and complete copy as was printed hold a public hearing in the lic. A copy of the staff re
-
in-
Council Council Chambers at the Port will be available to n-
and published in the Huntington Beach Huntington Beach Civic tere parties at City Hall
Center, 2000 Main Street,' + after ed September 3,1993.
PER-
and Fountain Valley issues of said Huntington Beach, Califor SONS are invited to attend'
ALL INTERESTED PER-
nia, on the date and at the .
newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: time indicated below to re- : said hearing and express)
ceive and consider the ' opinions , submit written evidence
to the
statements of all persons. City Clerk, d
w for or against the applica-
ho wish to be heard rela- lion as
tive to the application de outlined above. If
there are any further ques-
AuguSt 26, 1993 scribed below. tions please call Jane Mad-
DATE/TIME: Tuesday, era, Assistant Planner at
September 7, 1993, 7:00 536-5271.
September 2, 1993 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER:' Connie Brockway,
ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3/'. City Clerk, City of Hun-
NEGATIVE DECLARATION tington Beach, 2000
NO.92-34 Main Street, Hun-
APPLICANT/APPELLANT: tington Beach, CA
Jack H.Ellsworth 92648, (714) 536•
LOCATION:309 and 311 - 5227
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that 17th Street Published Huntington
the foregoing is true and correct. ZONE: Townlot Specific
Plan-Section B I
de Beach-Fountain Valleendent August 26,Sep-
of. REQUEST:A zone change P 9 an approximately 5,875 tember 2,1993
square foot area from; 084-026
TLSP-B (rownlot Specific
Executed on September 2 199 3 Plan-Section nal) OP (Of-
fice Profess_io_nal
at Costa Mesa, California.
Signature
C� �a
REQUEP FOR CITY COUNCO ACTION
Date September 7, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Prepared by: ��'
Michael Adams, Director of Community Development
Subject:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34/ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3
Consistent with Council Policy? Lo Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Ad A
Statement of Issue Recommendation, naFunding � 6R
Analysis, Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:�
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration is Negative Declaration No. 92-34 and Zone Change
No. 92-3 requested by Mr. Jack Ellsworth to amend the zoning of a 0.13 net acre (5,875 square
foot) site from a residential zone, TLSP(Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to C2 (Commercial
Business). The site consists of two 25 foot wide parcels located at 309/11 17th Street. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on July 7, 1993 and is
recommending a rezone to OP (Office Professional). Community Development staff is
recommending the property remain zoned for residential.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Motion to:
1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 with one mitigation measure (Attachment
No. 1) and,
2. Approve Zone Change No. 92-3 with findings (Attachment No. 2)by adopting
Ordinance NodR/I-A(Attachment No. 3).
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON JULY 7, 1993:
ON A MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34 BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES:BIDDLE, BOURGUIGNON,RICHARDSON, INGLEE
NOES:DETTLOFF, COOK
ABSENT: GORMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
MOTION PASSED
RCA -1- 3��-` .��=�,�i���% rca9234 /
PIO 5/85
•
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCI ACTION
Date September 7, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator CJ�
Prepared by: ��'
Michael Adams, Director of Community Development
Subject:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34/ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3
Consistent with Council Policy? Lo Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Transmitted for your consideration is Negative Declaration No. 92-34 and Zone Change
No. 92-3 requested by Mr. Jack Ellsworth to amend the zoning of a 0.13 net acre (5,875 square
foot) site from a residential zone, TLSP (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)to C2 (Commercial
Business). The site consists of two 25 foot wide parcels located at 309/11 17th Street. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on July 7, 1993 and is
recommending a rezone to OP (Office Professional). Community Development staff is
recommending the property remain zoned for residential.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Motion to:
1. Approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 with one mitigation measure (Attachment
No. 1) and,
2. Approve Zone Change No. 92-3 with findings (Attachment No. 2) by adopting
Ordinance No JR/1 -A(Attachment No. 3).
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON JULY 7, 1993:
ON A MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECOND BY BOURGUIGNON, THE PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34 BY THE
FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES:BIDDLE, BOURGUIGNON, RICHARDSON, INGLEE
NOES:DETTLOFF, COOK
ABSENT: GORMAN
ABSTAIN: NONE
MOTION PASSED
RCA -1- rca9234
PI O 5/85
ON A MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECOND BY INGLEE, THE PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVED ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3 FOR OP (OFFICE PROFESSIONAL)
ZONING WITH FINDINGS (SEE ATTACHMENT NO. 2)BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES:BIDDLE, BOURGUIGNON, RICHARDSON, INGLEE
NOES:DETTLOFF, COOK
ABSTAIN: GORMAN
ABSENT: NONE
MOTION PASSED
Staff Recommendation:
Motion to:
1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 (Attachment No. 1) with one mitigation
measure; and,
2. Deny Zone Change No. 92-3 with findings(Attachment No. 4)."
ANALYSIS:
A. Site Historyj
The subject site and the majority of the properties along 17th Street from the first alley inland of
Pacific Coast Highway to Palm Avenue were originally zoned M2 (Industrial). In 1972,the area
was rezoned from M2 (Industrial)to R3, which at the time, designated a Limited Multiple
Family Residence District. In February of 1976, many of the surrounding properties to the
northwest and southwest were redesignated as the Townlot Specific Plan. The two (2) blocks on
the east side of 17th Street between Walnut and Orange Avenues were also included in the
Specific Plan while the subject property remained zoned R3 (Medium-High Density Residential).
In August of 1976, all of 17th Street from Walnut Avenue to Palm Avenue was included in the
Townlot Specific Plan. In 1978,the property between the subject site and Olive Avenue to the
south was rezoned (Q)C3 (Qualified-General Business District. In 1983,the property to the
south was rezoned to its present C2 (Community Business)designation when the City eliminated
the C3 zoning district city-wide.
In 1966, the applicant petitioned the Board of Zoning Adjustments for a variance to the parking
standards in conjunction with construction of a 1,600 square foot light industrial building. The
Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the request or a one (1)parking space reduction and did not
allow two (2) of the four(4)provided spaces to be arranged in tandem. Mr. Ellsworth
subsequently appealed the decision to the Planning Commission where the request was approved
against the recommendations by staff. The applicant, Mr. Ellsworth, has owned Lot 11 of the
subject site since March of 1970 and has owned Lot 9 since December of 1975.
lei/ RCA -2- rca9234
{ / 4 •
��bjP.� 440 MAP
A + S`
i
7° o�
�j
C� /
,r
/Q .e y•
IINI
r
6 4
L J
K, �w
J
a�
of
B. Applicant's Request:
The southwesterly parcel (309 17th Street) is currently vacant while the northwesterly lot(311
17th Street) is occupied by a 1,600 square foot commercial building which is non-conforming
with the current residential zoning. The applicant operates an electronics and computer parts
repair business from the site. The zone change is requested to allow commercial development of
the vacant parcel and to have the appropriate zoning for the existing commercial building. The
applicant wishes to continue the commercial uses of the property to the south to his property(See
Narrative in Planning Commission Report, Attachment No. 7) .
The applicant has indicated he has had several offers to purchase the vacant parcel for use as a
residential site but he has declined to sell the property. He also does not wish to consolidate the
two (2) lots for a larger site.
.3
RCA -3- rca9234
C. Planning Commission Recommendation:
Although the applicant is requesting C2 (Community Business)zoning on the subject property,
the Planning Commission is recommending approval of OP (Office Professional) zoning. The
Planning Commission felt that OP (Office Professional)would be more compatible with the
surrounding residential uses than a commercial business. The Planning Commission preferred to
limit the potential tenants to office uses only because the array of possible commercial
opportunities may impact the existing residential properties with additional noise and traffic,
especially with the existing condition of vehicular access to the site from an alley that is also
utilized by residences..
D. sue
The Planning staff does not support the applicant's request for a commercial zone (C2) or the
Planning Commission's action for an office professional zone (OP) on the subject property.
Planning staff recommends denial of Zone Change No. 92-3 based upon the following issues.
1. General Plan-The proposed zone change does not conform to the existing General Plan
Land Use designation of Medium Density Residential (see Attachment No. 2). In
addition, the subject property under its current zoning designation, can contribute two (2)
housing units towards meeting the City's share of the Regional Housing Needs
Assessment(RHNA)requirements. Although it may not be appropriate to develop the
vacant parcel with a housing unit(between two (2) commercial structures) at this time,
the rezoning of the parcel to C2 (Community Business) or OP (Office Professional)
would prevent all potential residential development. The existing 22 year old building
may be due to recycle soon and the most appropriate use would be residential.
49MM AL FLA
LAMD
,p
\�
is;`j:::':�{ei:::��:::•i`
) YY
�1
I
Y
1
♦ ♦ �,
N N:T.S. •.; YY
RCA -4- rca9234
rf
2. Copatibili1y- The existing structure and use of the property is currently legal, non-
conforming. The subject site is surrounded on three (3) sides by residentially zoned land
which is not compatible with either the existing commercial building or the proposed OP
(Office Professional) zoning. Although the;two (2)parcels to the south are zoned C2
(Community Business),the General Plan or long range goal for the entire area is Medium
Density Residential.
M2-01 Z
E 1
R
`114�
91
3. Other Downtown Commercial -There are a number of other commercially zoned
properties'in the downtown area that are not yet developed. Planning staff maintains that
it is important for these other properties to become viable,prospering enterprises before a
parcel with so many inadequacies is granted a zone change to commercial or office
professional.
4. Lot Size and Lot Width-New commercial developments in the C2 (Community
Business) or OP (Office Professional) zoning districts require a minimum lot size of
10,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The OP (Office Professional)
district, however, contains an exception that any lot created prior to June 1972, the
effective date of the ordinance, can be considered a legal building site. The applicant's
two (2) subject properties are each 2,937.5 square feet in lot size and 25 feet in lot width
and can be considered a legal building site under the exception described above. The size
RCA -5- rca9234
�4
of the involved parcels are substantially below the standards established for commercial
and professional office properties. The substandard lot size and lot width may result in a
design project that will have difficulty meeting the development standards of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. Some examples of the development requirements
include minimum parking, setbacks, and landscaping standards that the project most
likely will not be able to meet. For example, as stated earlier,the existing structure
received approval of a parking variance in 1966. Planning staff maintains that the site is
inadequate in size for commercial or professional office development.
5. Parking_and Access - The subject property is situated on 17th Street with an alley to the
rear. Since the lots are too narrow for curb and driveway cuts on the arterial, any on-site
parking will probably be provided at the rear of the property off the alley. However, a
typical visitor to the site will park on 17th Street at the most visible entrance to the
building. This layout results in two (2) negative impacts to the surrounding property
owners. First, staffs midday visits to the site reveal 17th Street parking to be already
highly impacted. A new office building will increase on-street parking since access to the
alley is not readily visible nor convenient. Secondly, should a patron realize the
availability of parking from the alley,the vehicle would travel through an established
residential area.
6. Environmental - The Environmental Assessment Committee reviewed the initial study
and recommended approval of a negative declaration with one(1)mitigation measure.
Because the applicant did not submit conceptual development plans, the Environmental
Assessment Committee instigated a mitigation measure to require any request for
development to submit an initial study. The Environmental Assessment Committee was
concerned that some possible commercial developments would result in negative noise,
traffic, compatibility, etc., impacts to the surrounding residential properties.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,the Department of Community
Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 92-34 for twenty-one (21) days, and one
(1)written comment was received. The comment was submitted by the Environmental Board
and recommended approval of Negative Declaration No. 92-34 with mitigation. The comment
did not address any deficiency of the document, raise any significant environmental issues or
request additional information; as such, a substantive response is not appropriate within the
context of CEQA. A copy of the comment has been included as an attachment to this report.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Not Applicable
W
RCA -6- rca9234
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council may approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 and approve Zone Change No.
92-3 for C2(Community Business) zoning as requested by the applicant with findings
(Attachment No. 5)by adopting Ordinance Now-B (Attachment No. 6).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Negative Declaration No. 92-34
2. Findings for Approval for OP Zoning (Planning Commission Recommendation)
3. Draft Ordinance for Office Professional (OP) zoning (includes dimensioned site map)
4. Findings for Denial (Staff Recommendation)
5. Findings for Approval for C2 Zoning (Applicant's Request)
6. Draft Ordinance for Community Business (C2)Zoning(includes dimensioned site map)
7. Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 7, 1993
8. Letters in support of Commercial Zoning
RCA -7- rca9234
J• 4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
.� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: Jane Madera
Assistant Planner
FROM: Julie Osugi A
Assistant PI n' ner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NO. 92-34
DATE: May 6, 1993
Applicant : Jack H. Ellsworth
Request: A zone change of an approximately 5, 875 square foot area
from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to C2
(Community Business) . One-half of the subject area is
currently occupied by a 1, 600 square foot building and
the other half is vacant . No development of the vacant
parcel is proposed at this time. Subsequent development
will be subject to a minimum of a Use Permit review and
possible Conditional Exceptions (Variances) to the
development standards of C2 zoning.
Location: 309 and 311 17th Street
Background
The Environmental Assessment Committee has reviewed the
environmental assessment form noted above and has determined that a
negative declaration may be filed for the project. In view of this,
a draft negative declaration was prepared and was published in the
Huntington Beach Independent for a twenty-one (21) day public review
period commencing Thursday, May 13, 1993 and ending Wednesday, June
2, 1993 . If any comments regarding the draft negative declaration
are received, you will be notified -immediately.
Recommendation
The Environmental Assessment Committee recommends that the Zoning
Administrator approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 finding that
the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on
the environment .
Mitigation Measures
X The attached mitigating measures will reduce potential
environmental effects resulting from the project and are recommended
as conditions of approval .
C� JO: 1p
(6703d)
A-r-r tir 11 A AG
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Notice is hereby given by the Department of Community Development,
Planning Division of the City of Huntington Beach that the following
Draft Negative Declaration request has been prepared and will be
submitted to the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission for
consideration. The Draft Negative Declaration will be available for
public review and comment for twenty-one (21) days commencing
Thursday, May 13 ; 1993 .
Draft Negative Declaration No . 92-34 analyzes the potential
environmental impacts associated with a zone change of an
approximately 5, 875 square foot area from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific
Plan Section B) to C2 (Community Business) . One-half of the subject
area is currently occupied by a 1, 600 square foot building and the
other half is vacant. No development of the vacant parcel is
proposed at this time. Subsequent development under the proposed
zoning will be subject to a minimum of a Use Permit review and
possible Conditional Exceptions (Variances) to the development
standards of C2 zoning. The subject site is located at 309 and 311
17th Street .
A copy of the request is on file with the Department of Community
Development, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California. Any person wishing to comment on the request may
do so in writing within twenty-one (21) days. of this notice by
providing written comments to the Department of Community
Development, Planning Division, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, CA
92648 .
(6704d)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
PLANNING DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 92-34
1. Name of Proponent: Jack H. Ellsworth
Address: 311 17th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Phone Number: (714) 536-7616
2. Date Checklist Submitted for Review: September 4, 1992
3. Concurrent Entitlement(s): Zone Change No. 92-3
4. Proiect Location: 309 and 311 17th Street (west side of 17th Street between Olive and
Orange Avenues).
5. Proiect Description: A zone change of an approximately 5,875 square
foot area from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to C2
(Community Business). One half of the subject area is currently
occupied by a 1.600 square foot building and the other half is
vacant. No development of the vacant parcel is proposed at this
time. Subsequent development will be subject to a minimum of a Use
Permit review and possible Conditional Exceptions (Variances) to the
development standards of C2 Zoning.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of answers are included after each subsection.)
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? _ _ X
�C
• _Y_U Maybe NQ
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ X
Discussion: The project consists of one developed parcel and one vacant parcel at this time. Subsequent
development of the vacant parcel, under the proposed zoning may result is some disruption, displacement,
compaction and overcovering of soil . However, impacts associated with the disruption, displacement,
compaction and overcovering of soil are not anticipated to be substantially different from those associated
with development under existing zoning. Furthermore, soils impacts of future development will be project
specific and will be addressed through the entitlement process. Future development will also be subject to
standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a soils study and implementation of
specifications contained therein; no significant impacts to earth conditions are anticipated to result from
the proposed project.
C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? _ _ X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ _ X
Discussion: The project site is primarily flat and does not contain any unique physical features. Any
changes in topography proposed by subsequent development will be project specific and will be addressed
through the entitlement process.
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ _ X
Discussion: The project does not include development of the vacant parcel at this time. Development of the
vacant site may result in short—term wind erosion impacts during the site preparation and construction
phases. However, subsequent development will be subject to entitlement procedures and standard conditions
of approval requiring implementation of dust control measures; no significant impact is anticipated.
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay, inlet or lake? _ _ X
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? _ _ X
Discussion: The project is not located in the vicinity of the Alquist—Priolo Special Hazard Zone or any
other known fault hazard; however, the site is located in an area of potential expansive soils as identified
in the City's 1974 Geotechnical Inputs report. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions
of approval which require submittal of soils reports and implementation of measures contained therein; no
significant impacts are anticipated.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ X
Discussion: Short Term: The proposed project area consists of one commercial building and one vacant
parcel at this time. However, subsequent development under the proposed zoning may result in short—term
emissions from construction equipment and grading activities. Short—term dust and pollutant emissions are
not anticipated to be substantially different from those generated by development under the existing
zoning. Development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of dust
control measures and restriction of construction activities during second stage smog alerts and high ozone
days. No significant impact is anticipated.
1�
Environmental Checklist —2— �, (1896D)
V� • • Yes Maybe No
Long Term: Subsequent development and operation of commercial uses on the site may result in emissions due
to vehicle traffic and equipment/processes used on site. However, vehicle emissions resulting from
subsequent development are not anticipated to be substantial; future occupants of the site will be subject
to standard conditions of approval which require prospective occupants to provide information on
equipment/processes which may generate air pollutants to the South Coast Air Quality Management District for
review and approval prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. No significant impacts are anticipated.
b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ X
Discussion: Commercial land uses, allowed by the proposed zoning, are more likely to generate fumes or
odors than the single—family uses allowed under the current zoning. The project site is adjacent to
single—family and multi—family residences to the north, east, and west and adjacent to a non—conforming
industrial use of a commercial property to the south. However, subsequent development will be subject to
additional review through the entitlement process and as discussed above, prospective occupants will be
required to obtain SCAQMD approval prior to occupancy.
C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? _ _ X
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or
fresh waters? _ _ X
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? _ X
Discussion: One—half of the project site is currently occupied by an electronic/computer parts repair
business and is partially covered by impervious surfaces. Development of the vacant parcel is not proposed
at this time. Subsequent development is anticipated to increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the
site and will result in additional runoff from the site. Alternations to drainage patterns and run off
resulting from subsequent development will also be project specific and will be addressed through the
entitlement process. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring
submittal of grading and hydraulic studies to insure that development will not adversely impact drainage in
the area. No significant impact is anticipated.
C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? _ _ X
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? _ _ X
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ _ X
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ _ X
9. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ _ X
. h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water
supplies? _ _ X
Discussion: The proposed zoning is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in water usage or a
significant reduction in the amount of water available to the city.
�V
Environmental Checklist —3— (1896D)
Yak Maybe No
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X
Discussion: The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of the flood plain or any other water
related hazards.
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _ _ X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any mature, unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? _ _ X
d. Reduction in acreage of an agricultural crop? _ _ X
Discussion (a—d): One—half of the site is currently occupied by an electronics/computer parts repair
business and the other half is vacant. The vacant half of the parcel currently has no plant species. No
significant impact is anticipated.
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? _ _ X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X
C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals? _ _ X
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X
Discussion (a—d): The site is occupied by an electronic/computer parts repair business and does not appear
to support any unique animal species. No significant impact is anticipated.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? _ X
Discussion:
-Short—term: The project area consists of one commercial business at this time. Equipment associated with
construction of subsequent development may generate short—term increases in noise during the site
preparation and construction phases. However, construction noise impacts resulting from development under
the proposed zoning are not anticipated to be substantially different than those resulting from construction
under the TLSP—B Zoning. Subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval which
limit the hours of construction activities and compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance.
l�
Environmental Checklist —4— (1896D)
1�
Ygs Maybe No
Long-Term: The project site is located within a 65 CNEL noise contour. The proposed zone change will
remove residential zoning from the 65 CNEL. However, proposed zone change will also allow for commercial
development adjacent to multi-family residences. Commercial uses and associated activities (such as truck
traffic) is anticipated to increase noise in the project area and may impact residences to the north and
east. Noise impacts are anticipated to be project specific and will be addressed through the entitlement
process. No significant impacts are anticipated.
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ _ X
Discussion: See 6a.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? _ X _
Discussion: Subsequent development will result in new light and glare in the project vicinity. Subsequent
development will be subject to entitlement and standard conditions of approval which require submittal of a
lighting plan to insure that lighting will not spill onto adjacent properties. No significant impact is
anticipated.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area? _ X
Discussion: The proposed project is a change in zoning of the property. The existing zoning would allow
for development of approximately 2 single-family residential units. The project proposes amending the
zoning on a 5,875 square foot strip of property from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to allow for
commercial development on the site. Although one-half of the property is currently occupied by a commercial
use, rezoning of the property is anticipated to result in development of more intense commercial uses
adjacent to a residential area. Potential impacts will be addressed through implementation of the
mitigation measure identified below requiring preparation of an initial study to analyze specific
development of the site. The initial study shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall be processed prior to or concurrently with entitlement
processing. The rezoning will also result in two (2) parcels of land non-conforming to minimum commercial
lot width and lot size requirements. The compatibility of the C2 zoning with adjacent uses and C2
development standards will be determined by analysis contained in this study and during the zone change
review process.
Mitigation: Subsequent development of the site, under the C2 zoning, shall be subject to preparation of an
intial study to analyze the potential environmental impacts of specific development of the site. The
initial study shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and shall be processed prior to or concurrently with entitlement processing.
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
- a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ _ X
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ _ X
Discussion (a-b): Development of the vacant parcel on the site with a new commercial building may increase
the demand of natural and energy resources. However, the increased usage is not anticipated to be
substantial and any impact to the rate of usage or depletion of supplies is anticipated to be negligible.
Project specific energy usage impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process. Impacts will be
reduced further through implementation of the Energy Conservation Standards in Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code as required through standard conditions of approval.
Environmental Checklist -5- (1896D)
;s • • Yes Maybe No
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? - - X
Discussion: A portion of the site is currently occupied by an electronic/computer part repair business
which will remain after the zone change on the site. There are currently no hazardous substances present on
site and are not likely with any subsequent development.
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? _ _ X
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of
the human population of an area? _ _ X
Discussion: The proposed zone change will eliminate development of future housing opportunities on the
site. However, the site will provide approximately 2 residential units which is not considered
substantial. The proposed project may provide additional employment opportunities in the city. However,
the number of jobs created is not anticipated to be substantial. The potential impacts to the city's growth
rate and housing demand is considered negligible.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ _ X
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ X _
Discussion: Subsequent commercial development, based upon approximate floor area ratios, is projected to
generate approximately 22 trips with a peak hour trip generation of approximately 3 trips (calculations
based upon ITE trip generation rates). The current zoning is anticipated to allow for development of
approximately 2 units and will generate an estimated 24 ADT and 3 peak hour trips. The anticipated change
in potential trip generations is negligible. Project specific traffic impacts resulting from subsequent
development will be addressed through the entitlement process; no significant impacts are anticipated.
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new off—site parking? _ _ X
Discussion: Subsequent development will be required to comply with Article 960: "Parking and Landscaping"
of the City of Huntington Beach Ordinance Code which requires that all parking be accommodated on site.
However, a conceptual development plan submitted by the applicant provides only four (4) of the eight (8)
parking spaces required for the size of the building proposed. While the plans are only conceptual at this
point and subject to change, it appears that a conditional exception (variance) would be required for a
reduction of parking spaces as well as other development standards due to the size of the parcel involved.
Parking requirements will be addressed through the entitlement process.
C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ X
Discussion: There are several commercial projects in the vicinity at this time. The zone change will allow
for additional commercial development in the vicinity of single—family and multi—family residential units
and has a potential for generating commercial traffic on adjacent residential streets. Project specific
circulation impacts will be addressed through the entitlement process. No significant impact is anticipated.
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ _ X
Discussion: See 13c.
Environmental Checklist —6— /t (18960)
• • Yes Maybe No
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ — X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X
Discussion: Subsequent development will result in the presence of construction and commercial traffic and
may result in increased obstacles to vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians during the construction and
operation of commercial uses. Construction related hazards are short—term and are not anticipated to be
substantial. Furthermore, subsequent development will be subject to standard conditions of approval
requiring submittal of a construction vehicle routing plan. Commercial vehicle use on the site will be
dependent on future uses on the site. Project specific traffic impacts will be addressed through the
entitlement process.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? — — X
b. Police protection? _ — X
C. Schools? — — X
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ — X
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _ X
Discussion: One—half of the project site is currently unimproved. However, sidewalk, curb and gutter are
already in place and are maintained by the City.
f. Other governmental services? _ _ X
Discussions (a—d,f): All public services are currently available for the site. Development under the
proposed zoning will not result in a need for any additional fire, police, school, park, public facilities
or services. No significant impact is anticipated.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ _ X
Discussion: See 9 (a,b).
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing source of energy, or require the
development of sources of energy? _ _ X
Discussion: See 9 (a,b).
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations
to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? _ _ X
b. Communication systems? _ _ X
C. Water? X
Environmental Checklist —7— /� i (1896D)
• Yes Maybe No
d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ _ X
e. Storm water drainage? _ _ X
f. Solid waste and disposal? _ _ X
Discussion (a—f): All utilities are currently available in the project vicinity. Subsequent development of
commercial uses may require installation of connections into existing utility systems; however, the
subsequent development is not anticipated to result in a need for any new systems or substantial alterations
to existing systems to serve the site.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? _ _ X
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ _ X
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site
open to public view? _ _ X
Discussion: The site does not currently offer any view opportunities and is not anticipated to result in an
aesthetically offensive site; no significant impact is anticipated.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Discussion: The proposed project site will not impact any recreational opportunities.
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site? _ _ X
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric
or historic building, structure, or object? _ _ X
C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? _ _ X
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area? _ _ X
Discussion (a—d): The proposed project site is not located in the vicinity of any known archaeological
sites.
21 . Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub—
stantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory? _ _ X
Environmental Checklist —8— �a (1896l
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) _ _ X
C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively consid-
erable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts
on the environment is significant.) _ _ X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ _ X
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a _
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL
BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date Sig6ture
Revised: March, 1990 For: City of Huntington Beach
Community Development Department
Environmental Checklist -9- tL (1896D)
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES FOR
DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
1. Impact:
Subsequent development of the site under the proposed C2 (Community Business) zoning may potentially result
in noise, light and glare and other compatability impacts to adjacent residential units.
Mitigation•
Subsequent development of the site, under the C2 zoning, shall be subject to preparation of an intial study
to analyze the potential environmental impacts of specific development of the site. The initial study shall
be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall
be processed prior to or concurrently with entitlement processing.
Environmental Checklist —10— �` (1896D)
0 moo 3700 V
t O.S.
z
.. ARGOSY Or_, <
= ul
(01HG(t
' \ Hill
� I •1
I
I w.tHlt
WAIH1t
Sl.lft
l
IIti✓A...
/t�/MIMj
1
1
1
I
VICINITY MAP
HUNTINGTON BFACH PLANNING DIVISION m
RI p as
\o \' /\/� V... �ys'e B RI O.•', RI(
PA-0-CZ � P�` ` -'RI'O' a..
�lo S.\
M 2 01 �" ' '
CZ \ �ac?• •q,.C�' h tip°a.�O�ca%
\O o o: 91• ty • ^n
f \c� N
10
OW -
Environmental
Assessment No.
HUNTINGTON BEACH
'`' HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
ZONEGI N��- NO. Q2-3
ENS 1 R�t�MtiNTACI, Abbe:6M AT
20 f t, Alley
50 feet 50 feet 25 feet 25 feet
TowA Di- Pla.+n rt s�-
c-r c 5
Vi 10,
u cv
R krnants
Q a
r, a x
% N
a u
Q `o PZI
�
u
o z Residential.
o a, i •
u } E
a a o
E U
O
U
313-17th St.
�y 301-17th St. 305-17th $t, 309-17th St, 311-171h St,
0dc
17th Street Scale, 1/16' - V 3
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH \
:j
TO: File
1
FROM: Jane Madera
Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR.
DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
DATE: June 4 , 1993
Draft Negative Declaration No. 92-34 analyzes the environmental
impacts associated with a proposal by Jack H. Ellsworth for a zone
change of an approximately 5, 875 square foot area from TLSP-B
(Townlot Specific Plan Section B) to C2 (Community Business) .
One-half of the subject area is currently occupied by a 1, 600 square
foot building and the other half is vacant. No development of the
vacant parcel is proposed at this time. Subsequent development will
be subject to a minimum of a Use Permit review and possible
Conditional Exceptions (variances) to the development standards of
C2 zoning .
The Draft Negative Declaration was advertised for a twenty-one (21)
day comment period which began on May 13 , 1993 and closed on June 2,
1993 . Notice of the Draft Negative Declaration was published in the
Huntington Beach Independent on May 13, 1993 . During the comment
period only one written comment was received.
The comment was submitted by the Environmental Board and recommended
approval of Negative Declaration No. 92-34 with mitigation. The
comment did not address any deficiency of the document, raise any
significant environmental issues or request additional information;
as such, a substantive response is not appropriate within the
context of CEQA. A copy of the comment has been attached to be
forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration prior to
action on the project .
The following commenting parties have been notified of the hearing
date for Negative Declaration No. 92-34 .
Norm Smith (Environmental Board Chairman)
4053 Aladdin Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Theresa Rey (Subcommittee Chairperson)
506 21st Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Attachment
JM: lp �y
(6896d) •O
•
Environr '� r �
CITY OF HUNTIlNGTCI BEACH t
HUITISGTON BE ACH Post Office Box •1993 Huntington Beach, California 92648
June 1, 1993 DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Julie Osugi
Assistant Planner
FROM: City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board
SUBJECT : Environmental Assessment Form No. 92-34
The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board has received
and reviewed the above mentioned Environmental Assessment
Form. The request for a zone change of an approximately
5 , 875 square foot area from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific plan
Section B) to C2 (Community Business) . Subsequent development
would be subject to a minimum of a Use Permit review and
possible Conditional Exceptions (variances) to the
development of standard C2 zoning. Location of the property
is at 309 and 311 17th Street .
The Environmental Board concurs with staff that the above
mentioned Negative Declaration be approved with mitigation
measures. and that the proposed project will not have a
significant adverse effect on the environment .
If you have (y�y questions or concerns regarding our comments ,
please contact Theresa Rey Chairperson of the Review
Committee.
c. c. Jim Cathcart
. Y
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3:
(PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION)
1. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to OP (Office Professional) does conform with the
- Land Use Element of the General Plan.
2 . The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to OP (Office Professional) is consistent with the
commercial properties to the south ,as well as the surrounding
residential land uses . A C2 (General Commercial) zone on the
subject property would not be compatible with the surrounding
land uses .
(7323d-2)
'4
ORDINANCE NO. 3 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE CHANGE OF ZONING
FROM THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
TLSP-B (TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN SECTION B)
TO OP (OFFICE PROFESSIONAL) ON REAL PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ORANGE AVENUE,
EAST OF 18th STREET, NORTH OF OLIVE AVENUE
AND WEST OF 17th STREET;
ZONE CHANGE 92-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 92-34
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City
Council have held separate duly noticed public hearings relative
to Zone Change No. 92-3 and Negative Declaration No. 92-34
wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information
presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all
evidence presented, the City Council finds that the zone change
and negative declaration are proper and consistent with the
General Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby ordain:
SECTION 1. The following described real property,
generally located south of Orange Avenue, east of 18th Street,
North of Olive Avenue, and west of 17th Street, as depicted on
the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein
by this reference, the legal description of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference,
is hereby changed from the current zoning classification of
v�
206 : 7/15/93 :sg -1-
TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) , to OP (Office
Professional) .
SECTION 2 . The Director of Community Development is
hereby directed to amend Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, District Map 10 (Sectional District Maps 9-6-11
and 10-6-11) so as to reflect the change contained in this
ordinance. The Director of Community Development is further
directed to file the amended map. A copy of such district map,
as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of
the City Clerk.
SECTION 3 . This ordinance; shall take effect thirty days
after its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held
on the day of 1993 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
5t-0:�Z��
City Clerk TiqjTTT
City Attorney P—e-
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator Director of Communit
Development
y1
206 : 7/15/93 : sg -2-
Onlcr* ;e5 10*
:i Escrow Not. 118 0493-PR BK 1 1602F61871
Loan No. R,ier�Ir
Cj vcn RECORDED AT REQUEST COP
WHEN RECORDED MAIL 1 O: iiree A !Le/wr FIRST AMER. TfTLE INS. Co.
JUN 1 1993 $3.00 IN orrlclAL nrcnntis OF
Mr. Jack Ellsworth ORANCE COUNTY,CALIF.
311 - 17Lh St. DEPARTMENT OF 8:00AM DEC 23 19.15
Huntington Bench, Ca. 92648 COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT 1.NryUECAALTLE,Co9nf7R91tnr0er
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: r•10
DO,,W/.IENTARY TRANSFER TAX
_�'ConlpoOld on the consideration or value of property conveyed;On
......Computed on the consideration or value less liens or ancumbramors
ABOVE ADDRESSEE remaining at ' e of we.
I L' 31ar..t�ra o Daclara or Aea dalarminlnp tag-F trm Naiw.--
A. P. N0. 0�3 115 — / 7 First American Title Insurance Company
GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
.� ELIzAnnit J. SWANNEP,, a widow,
hereby GRANTIS) to JACK If. ELLSWORTH, a single roan,
�. the real property in the City of Huntington Reacts,
,- County of Orange State of California, described as
L�
Lot 9 in Block 317 of the Seventeenth Street Section of Iluntington Beach, as shown
on a Map thereof recorded in Book 4, page 10 of Miscellaneous Naps, records of said
County.
nI l},�TV FJO-0)"AE-14110-Y -
w.r lC JDF C'iS As �
Dated
November 14. 1975
.'Elizabeth J. Swanner
STATE OF -_—
COUNTY OF I a
Wichita I -
-- I
On.. November.18,.1975_...
before one. the undersigttd, a Notary Public in Dad for said
State• personally appeatd ---'_ ___.__.-_.-'- --..-- -_'• .
Flizabgth J. Swanne_r _
known tome lobe the parson_whose name i S
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that
-- __._she---___- --- __—.--- e.eculed me same.
WITNESS myyhand a..d official seal. 1
Z� Sipratura L.![i IL oL a C /(C LtIZ LC �T�N �OVA11111 47his a.w to, of ic:.I ..o i'l .e.n
1002 110/69)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
A-1
RECORDING REQUESTED B• E �jI VEATi ~^
1�� R,�8T?s 49`
r ^�r AT THE REQUEST OF CALIF. LAND. TITI E OC•
JUN 11 1993
DEPARTMENT OF
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO R= V y`
United California Bank f IF�`rs: �.•'�`., fJ;i;r ?=' z�i0 ( __-
NAME 505 North Brand Boulevard
STREET Glendale, California �`''�� �` ---� r,_�• ` -• I��..ora�- I ; 1 :.`
ADDRESS _��—
CITY tr
STATE
SCrow: 159-5161 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
TITLE ORDER NO. TITLE OFFICER R 280398
FULL RECONVEYANCE
T1T'.-- II:S -RA,N AND TRUST MMPANY, a California corporation, as duly appointed Trustee under Deed
of Trust hereinafter referred to, having received from holder of the obligations thereunder a written request to reconaey,
reciting that all sums secured by said Deed of Trust have been fully paid, and said Deed of Trust and the note or notes
secured thereby having been surrendered to said Trustee for cancellation, does hereby RECONVEY, without warranty, to
the person or persons legally entitled thereto, the estate now held by it thereunder. Said Deed of Trust was executed by
JACK HOWARD ELLSWORTH Trustor,
and recorded in the official records of Los Angeles County, California, as follows:REC. 11/20/56 AS INSTR. NO. 1065 IN BOOK 52y83 PAGE OG
J
DESC.
Lot 11 in Tr. rr 5645, C 60/ 43 of maps.
In Witness Whereof, Title Insurance and Trust Company, as such Trustee, has caused its corporate name
and seal to be hereto affixed by its.Assistant Secretary, thereunto duly authorized on the date shown in the acknowl-
edgment cerrificate shown below.
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, as such Trustee
By
t�
STATE OF CALIFORNIAr Assistant Secretary
COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES SS.
On JANUARY 15, 1970 before me•the undersigned. a Notary Public in and for said State- C
personally appeared D• R o DUF�''Y , known to me to be an Assistant Secretary of
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as such Trustee, and known
to me to be the person who executed said instrument on behalf of the corporation therein name• and acknowledged to me that such cor-
poration executed the same as such Trustee.
1
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature /
A-Z
(This area for official notarial seal)
� ZONE Gl�N�� No. Q2-3
eNv 1 RORKWATA1., A6K.-VASNIV No. -3o�
20 f t, Alley
50 feet 50 feet 25 feet 255FFeet
TwJN�Ot `� { Q�Q�vI 'CIS?—,Qj
c-2 C-2
X
Cb In
D
X N
y (U
> `
Q U') 4
> -a 8 a as
o v
_� o Resldentlal
d a L •
V > w
E
E
E a V
E
O
U
313-17th St.
301-17 th St. 305-17th St. 309-17th St, 311-171h St,
17th Street Scale, 1/16' V 3
ATTACHMENT NO.
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3:
(STAFF RECOMMENDATION)
L. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)
to OP (Office Professional) does not conform with the Land Use Element
of the General Plan which designates the subject property as Medium
Density Residential. The property is inadequate in size to meet the goals,
needs and criteria of the office professional district. The subject property
consists of two (2), 25 foot wide lots that most likely will not be able to
provide adequate parking, landscaping, and setbacks and will impact
off-street parking on 17th Street. The current zoning and general plan
designations call for residential use of the property and an amendment of
the zoning would preclude the development of two (2) residential units.
2. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)
to OP (Office Professional) is not consistent with surrounding residential
land uses. The property is surrounded on three (3) sides by property zoned
and general planned for residential uses. The property is too narrow for a
curb cut on 17th Street so all access to on-site parking would take place
through the alley through residential uses. An office use of the property is
not compatible with the surrounding residential district.
(7323d)
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3:
(APPLICANT'S REQUEST)
1. Although the proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to Community Business (C2) does conform with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)
to Community Business (C2) is consistent with surrounding commercial
land uses to the south.
(7323d-3)
I'
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
SECTION 9061 TO PROVIDE CHANGE OF ZONING
FROM THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
TLSP-B (TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN SECTION B)
TO C2 (COMMUNITY BUSINESS) ON REAL PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF ORANGE AVENUE,
EAST OF 18th STREET, NORTH OF OLIVE AVENUE
AND WEST OF 17th STREET;
ZONE CHANGE 92-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION 92-34
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Planning and Zoning Law, the
Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City
Council have held separate duly noticed public hearings relative
to Zone Change No. 92-3 and Negative Declaration No. 92-34
wherein both bodies have carefully considered all information
presented at said hearings, and after due consideration of the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all
evidence presented, the City Council finds that the zone change
and negative declaration are proper and consistent with the
General Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby ordain:
SECTION 1. The following described. real property,
generally located south of Orange Avenue, east of 18th Street,
North of Olive Avenue, and west of 17th Street, as depicted on
the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein
by this reference, the legal description of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference,
is hereby changed from the current zoning classification of
206 : 6/17/93 : sg -1- • �
,t
TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B) , to C-2 (Community
Business) .
SECTION 2 . The Director of Community Development is
hereby directed to amend Section 9061 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, District Map 10 (Sectional District Maps 9-6-11
and 10-6-11) so as to reflect the- change contained in this
ordinance. The Director of Community Development is further
directed to file the amended map. A copy of such district map,
as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of
the City Clerk.
SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California, at a regular meeting thereof held
on the day of 1993 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
6- VI-53
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
0". zz&M4
City Administrator Director of Communit
Development
, w
f, 206 : 6/17/93 : sg -2-
�XR1V'-) VT- P%
0"'e 25100
Escr 118 0493-ItB BX 11602PE 1871
loan No.
RECI VED RECORDED AT REOUEST OF
WHEN RECORDED MAIL 10: !� lliillrr�T FIRST AMER. TITLE INS. CO.
JUN 1 1993 $3.00 IN OFFICIAL nErunOS OF
Mr. Jack Ellsworth ORANGE COUNTY.CALIF.
311 — 1701 St. DEPAJ TMENTOF 8:OOAM DEC 23 1915
Iluntington Reach, Cn. 92648 COMMUNI DEVELOPMENT J.WMECARLYLE,Ctmnt)Rowififr
SPACE ABOVE 'THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: ��
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX S.._Lr�-T►lP_......._.....------
L
..„"Computed on the consideration or value of property comeyed:OR
......Computed on the consideration or value less liens or ancumbrances
ABOVE ADDRESSEE remaining at a of sale.
I l/ Slpneture o DeclApahl ENarmininp te• F I m Na n•
A P. NO G /�� �O - /'7 First American Title Insurance Company
GRANT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
i
! FLI7.ABFTII J. SWANNER, a widow,
I
hereby GRANT(S) to JACK H. ELLS140RTH, a single man,
i )
J. the real property in the City of iluntington Beath,
�. County of Orange Stale of California, described as
Lot 9 in Block 317 of the Seventeenth Street Section of Huntington Beach, as shown
on a Map thereof recorded in Book 4, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
County.
IOU TV
tk(ll�lt�ll' 1AX --
.ofcrrls
luer_
Dated_ November 14, 1975 - �_�•'t.iG l:i 7-1— L.�i.{.. if_'_i'.J-•�'
lizabetll J. Swanner
STATE OF
COUNTY OF i ss. -�---- --.
--- Wichita
On November_ 18, 1975_ .. -- •--.
before me. live undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State. personally appeared
Elizabeth J. Swanner_ _
known to me to be the person whose name i8
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that
_ -_ She _. _ _. esecutedthesame.
WITNESS my hand and official seal. J
Signalur0 � •Lt-Ii' LL Ae-! /(C Lr tt.�� �riHm KOVA2lIR
.. IThis a.ee 1., .e..0
1002 110/69)
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE
I�
RECORDING REOUESTED B � i.� D�
���� R.38T 4910't"f ?
FT 'HE REQUEST OF CALIF, LAND. TIT � OG.
JUN 11 1993
gyp" J DEPARTMENT OF
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
v Or LC "r
United California Bank p�a ; G'ar
NAME 505 North Brand Boulevard
,
Glendale California STREET
ADDRESS 1 [-
CITY& 1
STATE I L-IJ1
scrow: I59-5I6I SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
TITLE ORDER NO. TITLE OFFICER
R280398
FULL RECONVEYANCE
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST CCIT4PATV:', a California corporation, as duly appointed Trustee under Deed
of Trust hereinafter referred to, having received from holder of the obligations thereunder a written request to reconvey,
reciting that all sums secured by said Deed of Trust have been fully paid, and said Deed of Trust and the note or notes
secured thereby having been surrendered to said Trustee for cancellation, does hereby RECONVEY, without warranty, to
the person or persons legally entitled thereto, the estate now held by it thereunder. Said Deed of Trust was executed by
JACK HOWARD ELLSWORTH Trustor,
and recorded in the official records of Los Angeles County, California, as follows:
REC. 11/29/56 AS INSTR. NO. io65 IN BOOK 52983 PAGE 189
DESC.
Lot 11 in Tr. F" 5645, @ 60/ 43 of maps.
In Witness Whereof, Title Insurance and Trust Company, as such Trustee, has caused its corporate name
and seal to be hereto affixed by its Assistant Secretary, thereunto duly authorized on the dare shown in the acknowl-
edgment certificate shown below.
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, as such Trustee
By
Assistant Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS.
J
On JANUARYJANUARY 15,1970 before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State.
personally appeared D. R o DUFFY known to me to be an Assistant Secretarc• of
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as such Trustee, and known
to me to be the person who executed said instrument on behalf of the corporation therein name,and acknowledged to me that such cor-
poration executed the same as such Trustee.
'=
WITNESS my hand and official seal. - � �_:
Signature v 7—
(This
(This area for official notarial seal)
ZONEommps No. Q2-3
eAV 1 RORKWATAL, AUpe.4 KTAT No. Rz -3� �,��•
20 f t. Alley
50 feet 50 feet 25 feet 25 Feet
Oor
Tov�wl0t Sg {ic QIUan rt'l.S�-g
c-z c-2 5c A 8
X
N
> X N
Q G
j a E M
o 8
`� v o � Residential •
d w i
U > N
N E
L a E
E v
E
O
U
313-17th St.
301-17th St. 305-17th St, 309-17th St, 311-17th St.
17th Street Scale 1/16' V :3
huntington beach department of community development
STAff
REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
JULY 7, 1993
ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3/
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
(309 and 311 - 17th Street)
Zone Change No. 92-3 is a request to redesignate and rezone a 0. 13
net acre (5, 875 square foot) site, located 100 feet north of Olive
Avenue on the west side of 17th Street, from a residential zone,
Townlot Specific Plan, Section B to C2 (Community Business) .
The site is surrounded on three (3) sides with property zoned and
used for residential purposes . In addition, the General Plan
designates the surrounding property on all four (4) sides of the
subject site as Medium Density Residential. The two (2) , 25 foot
wide lots are not suitable for commercial development because they
do not meet the minimum lot size and lot width requirements, they
would have difficulty providing adequate parking and landscaping,
and commercial development does not constitute the best use of the
two (2) subject parcels .
Staff recommends that the Planning- Commission approve Negative
Declaration No. 92-34 with one (1) mitigation measure and deny Zone
Change No. 92-3 because of incompatibility with the adjacent
residential uses .
A-PL-FM-23D
a �
< 9 q ~
,... ,�. 0,.� 1.._.._ .�
m
.._..I BOISA S G
Y = p
�• MFMMI
• � V / 1
DINGER
1 IL
WARNER
SLATER
'� ••� � TALBERT
PACIFIC COAST
'��� •�• j � ELLIS 0 s pQ
�•% 1 1 yJ 8
GARFIELD ARFIELD
PALM 01,ORKTO%74
ADAMS
1
i
INDIANAPOLIS
ORANGE 1
ATLANTA
xIlk
F
Z SITE W IHAAiILTON
w w N
VBANNING
W w 1
h
1
J
OLIVE
Adft ZC 92-3/ND 92-34
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
.� • •
•�1
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Community Development
DATE: July 7, 1993
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY
OWNER: Jack Ellsworth, 311 - 17th Street, Huntington Beach,
CA 92648
REOUEST_: A zone change of an approximately 5, 875 square foot
area from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)
to C2 (Community Business) .
LOCATION: 309 and 311 - 17th Street
DATE
ACCEPTED: April 30, 1993
ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan Section B
GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential
EXISTING USE: Vacant/Commercial
ACREAGE: . 13 acres (5, 875 square feet)
1. 0 SUGGESTED ACTION:
Motion to:
A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 92-34 with mitigation
measure; " and
B. "Deny Zone Change No. 92-3 with findings . "
2 .0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
Zone Change No. 92-3 is a request to redesignate and rezone a 0 . 13
net acre (5, 875 square foot) site (two 25 ' wide lots) , from a
residential zone, Townlot Specific Plan Section B to C2 (Community
Business) .
One-half (1/2) of the subject area (northeasterly lot, #11) is
currently occupied by a 1, 600 square foot commercial building and
the other half (southwesterly lot #9) is vacant . Although the zone
change does not constitute any new development, it will allow for
commercial development on the site. Development of the vacant
parcel is not proposed at this time, and any future request for
h commercial construction will be subject to a minimum of a use permit
review and possible conditional exceptions (variances) to the
development standards of C2 (Community Business) zoning .
i
vi '
3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS:
North, East and West of Subject Property:
GENERAL' PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential
ZONE: TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan Section B)
LAND USE: Apartments and Single Family Residences
South of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential
ZONE: C2 (Community Business)
LAND USE: Industrial Wholesaler and Retail Market
4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
Pursuant to the environmental regulations in effect at this time,
the Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative
Declaration No . 92-34 for twenty-one (21) days, and one (1) written
comment was received. The comment was submitted by the
Environmental Board and recommended approval of Negative Declaration
No. 92-34 with mitigation. The comment did not address any
deficiency of the document, raise any significant environmental
issues or request additional information; as such, a substantive
response is not appropriate within the context of CEQA. A copy of
the comment has been included as an attachment to this report.
5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable.
6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable.
7.0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable.
8. 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable.
9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Site History
The subject site and the majority of the properties along 17th
Street from the first alley inland of Pacific Coast Highway to Palm
Avenue were originally zoned M2 (Industrial) . In 1972, the area was
rezoned from M2 (Industrial) to R3, which at the time, designated a
Limited Multiple Family Residence District. In February of 1976,
many of the surrounding properties to the northwest and southeast
were redesignated as the Townlot Specific Plan. The two (2) blocks
on the east side of 17th Street between Walnut and Orange Avenues
were also included in the Specific Plan while the subject property
remained zoned R3 (Medium-High Density Residential) . In August of
1976, all of 17th Street from Walnut 'Avenue to Palm Avenue was
included in the Townlot Specific Plan. In 1978, the property
between the subject site and Olive Avenue to the south was rezoned
(Q)C3 or (Qualified) General Business District . In 1983 , the
property to the south was rezoned to its present C2 (Community
Business) designation when the City eliminated the C3 zoning ,G�1
district city-wide.
Staff Report - 7/7/93 -2- (7060d)
I
In 1966, the applicant petitioned the Board of Zoning Adjustments
for a variance to the parking standards in conjunction with
construction of a 1, 600 square foot light industrial building . The
Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the request for a one (1) parking
space reduction and did not allow two (2) of the four (4) provided
spaces to be arranged in tandem. Mr . Ellsworth subsequently
appealed the decision to the Planning Commission where the request
was approved against the recommendations by staff . The applicant,
Mr . Ellsworth, has owned Lot 11 of the subject site since March of
1970 and has owned Lot 9 since December of 1975 .
The applicant has indicated he has had several offers to purchase
the vacant parcel for use as a residential site but he has declined
to sell the property. He also does not wish to consolidate the two
(2) lots for a larger site.
Issues and Analysis
The Planning staff does not support the applicant ' s request for a
commercial zone on the subject property. Planning staff recommends
denial of Zone Change No. 92-3 based upon the following analysis .
1. General Plan - The proposed zone change does not conform to the
existing General Plan Land Use designation of Medium Density
Residential (see Attachment No. 2) . In addition, the subject
property under its current zoning designation can contribute two
(2) housing units towards meeting the City' s share of the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirements . Although
it may not. be appropriate to develop the vacant parcel with a
housing unit (between two [21 commercial structures) at this
time, the rezoning of the parcel to C2 (Community Business)
would prevent all potential residential development . The
existing 22 year old building may be due to recycle soon and the
most appropriate use would be residential .
2 . Compatibility - The existing structure and use of the property
is currently legal, non-conforming . The subject site is
surrounded on three (3) sides by residentially zoned land which
is not compatible with either the existing commercial building
or the proposed C2 (Community Business) zoning. Although the
two (2) parcels to the south are zoned C2 (Community Business) ,
the General Plan or long range goal for the entire area is
Medium Density Residential .
3 . Other Downtown Commercial - There are a number of other
commercially zoned properties in the downtown area that are not
yet developed. Planning staff maintains that it is important
for these other properties to become viable, prospering
enterprises before a parcel with so many inadequacies is granted
a zone change to commercial .
4 . Lot Size and Lot Width - New commercial developments in the C2
(Community Business) zoning districts require a minimum lot size
of 10, 000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet . The
applicant ' s two (2) subject properties are each 2, 937 . 5 square
feet in lot size and 25 feet in lot width. The size of the
Staff Report - 7/7/93 -3- (7060d)
involved parcels are substantially below the standards
established for commercial properties . The substandard lot size
and lot width may result in a design project that will have
difficulty meeting the development standards of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code. Some examples of the development
requirements include minimum parking, setbacks, and landscaping
standards that the project most likely will not be able to
meet . For example, as stated earlier, the existing structure
received approval of a parking variance in 1966 . Planning staff
maintains that the site is inadequate in size for commercial
development .
5 . Parking and Access - The subject property is situated on 17th
Street with an alley to the rear. Since the lots are too narrow
for curb and driveway cuts on the arterial, any on-site parking
will probably be provided at the rear of the property off the
alley. However, a typical commercial patron to the site will
park on 17th Street at the most visible entrance to the
building . This layout results in two (2) negative impacts to
the surrounding property owners . First, staff ' s midday visits
to the site reveal 17th Street parking to be already highly
impacted. A new commercial structure will increase on-street
parking since access to the alley is not readily visible nor
convenient . Secondly, should a patron realize the availability
of parking from the alley, the vehicle would travel through an
established residential area. Mixing commercial traffic, which
may include early morning deliveries or heavy peak hour trips,
with residential traffic is not appropriate.
6 . Environmental - The Environmental Assessment Committee reviewed
the initial study and recommended approval of a negative
declaration with one (1) mitigation measure. Because the
applicant did not submit conceptual development plans, the
Environmental Assessment Committee instigated a mitigation
measure to require any request for development to submit an
initial study. The Environmental Assessment Committee was
concerned that some possible commercial developments would
result in negative noise, traffic, compatibility, etc. , impacts
to the surrounding residential properties .
10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Negative
Declaration No. 92-34 with a mitigation measure and deny Zone Change
No. 92-3 with the following findings:
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3 :
1. The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to C2 (Community Business) does not conform with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan which designates the
subject property as Medium Density Residential . The property is
inadequate in size to meet the goals, needs and criteria of the
community business district . The subject property consists of
two (2) , 25 foot wide lots that most likely will not be able to
provide adequate parking, landscaping, and setbacks and will impact off-street parking on 17th Street . The current zoning 415
Staff Report - 7/7/93 -4- (7060d)
and general plan designations call for residential use of the
property and an amendment of the zoning would preclude the
development of two (2) residential units .
2 . The proposed zone change from TLSP-B (Townlot Specific Plan
Section B) to C2 (Community Business) is not consistent with
surrounding residential land uses . The property is surrounded
on three (3) sides by property zoned and general planned for
residential uses . The property is too narrow for a curb cut on
17th Street so all access to on-site parking would take place
through the alley through residential uses . A commercial use of
the property is not compatible with the surrounding residential
district .
11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The Planning Commission may approve Zone Change No. 92-3 with
findings and conditions of approval and forward to the City Council
for adoption.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Zoning Map
2 . General Plan Land Use Map
3 . Narrative
4 . Negative Declaration No. 92-3
5. Draft Ordinance (includes dimensioned site map)
SH:JM:kjl
Staff Report - 7/7/93 -5- (7060d)
4•�,P
June 15 , 1992
Planing Department
City of Huntington Beach, Ca.
To whom it may concern:
This request for a zoning change relates to the 300 block of 17th
Street. To be sn_ecific, the eytension of the existing C-2 zoning of
lots #15 and 416 to include lots #13 and 014.
A descript_on of t;:ese propert=es i S -s fo'_'_ows:
Lot #16 (301-17th) Ocean Pac_fic Market (zoned C-2)
Lot 015 (305-17th) Lifetime Computer Products (zoned C-2)
Lot 014 (309-17th) undeveloped (zoned R-2*)
Lot #13 (311-17th) Ellsworth ='roducts Co. (zoned R-2*)
Ellsworth Products Co. has be-en located at 31_1_-17th since 1970, at
which time the zoning was M-2. Due to re-zoning of this area of 17th
Street from M-2 to R-2* sometime in the late 1970's (initiated by the
City of Huntington :each) , Luis business is now classified as a non-
conforming use in a R-24: area. Also, lot #14, located between two
c 1 p }1iu; 1 i Gc ; r� 3 ct�+.P ^� �nbo '� P t.r; T.hP �. rrent comet rcia typo -_d_ng� _s __ Ste _- __� du� _ _ e _ _
R-2* zoning.
By extending the C-2 zoning to include lots #13 and #14, the C-2 zone
will be a contiguous 150 feet. This will correct the classification of
the building and business on lot #13 and allow compatible develop-cent
of lot #14. Lot #14 is the only undeveloped lot in the 300 block of
17th Street.
The property and business owners of 301-17th and of 305-17th are in
favor of this requested C-2 extension.
Sincerely,
Jack H. Ellsworth
311-17th Street
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
(714) 536-7616
Robert A. Lind
6021 Littlefield Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
July 6, 1993
Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach
Reference : Case 92-3
To Whom it May Concern:
I am the owner of the property at 313 17th Street .
Since there are already commercial buildings surrounding
the vacant lot at 309 17th Street it seems to me that it
is logical to extend that zoning to this vacant lot .
If you build a residential property between these
commercial properties it would certainly be less
desirable for the tenants .
There is also a parking problem evenings and weekends in
this area. Commercial property lessen this problem
because they normally require parking only week days .
For these reasons I am in favor of the zoning change .
Sincerely,
Robert A. Lind `
MTAC,VAf g� S "a
I-
Su
� C�
+; .� 0LUMBU �
305 SEVENTEENTH ST. • HUNTINSTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 • TEL:[7141 969-2421 • FAX:960-0638
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Zone Case 92-3
Members of the Planning Commission,
I wish to express my approval of the requested zone change for lots 013
and #14 (31 1 and 309 17t h Street) from TLSP-B to C2 (Corm un i t y Business) .
I encourage members of the Commission to vote in favor of this zone change.
Sincerely,
Paul Columbus
305-i7tn 5`-reet
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
302 18TH ST.
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF 92648
JULY 7, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - REFERENCE CASE # 92-3
I RESIDE & OWN THE PROPERTY AT 302 18TH ST-CORNER OF 18TH & OLIVE
JACK ELLSWORTH'S PROPERTY AT 309 17TH ST IS IN THE MIDDLE OF 3
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THAT STRETCH OF BLOCK . I SEE NO REASON
WHY THE ZONING ON THAT LOT SHOULD BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE
COMMERCIAL ZONING SURROUNDING IT. AS A BUILDER, I WOULD NOT
WISH TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL LOTS
AND A BUYER FOR THOSE RESIDENCES WOULD BE CONSIDERING THAT
AS A LESS DESIRABLE LOCATION.
THE PARKING CONGESTION IS ON THE WEEKENDS AND NIGHTS . I DON' T
THINK THIS WOULD ADD TO THE PROBLEM BECAUSE ANY ADDITIONAL
VEHICLES FROM THE COMMERCIAL WOULD BE ON WEEKDAYS .
I AM IN FAVOR OF MR. ELLSWORTH REQUEST FOR A ZONGNG CHANGE.
RESPECTFUL+Y,
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
EXHIBITS RE: ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
SUBMITTED BY JACK ELLSWORTH, APPLICANT.
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 �t �aN�. Q��E//4�(►�
on
RECEIVE ANf MADE A
PART OTE RECORD AT
- ` MEETING
ITEM N0. ���
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
Date: July 9 , 1993
NOTICE OF ACTION
ZONE CHANGE
Applicant : Jack Ellsworth, 311 - 17th Street, Huntington Beach, CA
92648
Subject : ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3
Your application to change the zoning classification upon subject
property was acted on by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission at
its pulic hearing on July 7, 1993 and your request
was :
WITHDRAWN
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS XX (see attached)
DISAPPROVED
TABLED
CONTINUED UNTIL
Pursuant to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, a recommendation
for approval or conditional approval by the Planning Commission will
be transmitted to the City Council to be acted on at a public
hearing . A recommendation for denial by the Planning Commission
will allow the City Council to deny the reclassification of property
without holding a public hearing unless an appeal is filed to the
City Council by you or another interested party. Said appeal must
be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds
by and upon which the party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal
must be accompanied by a filing fee of five hundred (500) dollars
and be submitted to the City Clerk' s office within ten (10) days of
the date of the Commission' s action.
In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the
filing fee is July 19, 1993 P
(7168d-4)
��� 4 City -of- Huntington Beac
X~,90 ' y I'-f1 t S®R T AL U22
US POSTAGE
P.O. BO ,; . ' v CALIFORNIA 92U8 FIRST CI,RSS 14fiAI _ 4 2
JACK ELLSWORTH r''
311 - 17th STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 f
I
4
�p j,`� w +
still II�I����LIJI,�►I„LII����II,I 1,1„U��1��1►�i,�I,IU�,�I�i,,,,�ll„JI,,;11(`. ��
J \
o A •
•0
i
�< z
ikr
�5 174 3vR - -
Commar c1 I'7 t�
�r
i
iI
` f
_ I
OR = Owner Residence
PL = Parking Lot I
GP = Garage Parking
E/P= Ellsworth Products 18 t h Street
r 304 306 308 310 1312 1314 322 3�4 326 328
I I �' II '� I I + , I , 7-
I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I
❑R ❑R ❑R OR ❑R ❑R 1 Apartments 1 OR OR OR OR
I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I
I I i I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I
I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I
I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I
1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I
I 1 f I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I
r' F-----� GP ' GP I I I I 1 I I 1 , , 1 h----- I r----- I
-----� i-----i i-----i Lr--------------i r-----� i ------ i -----
' GP ' -----' L-----J I I I I I I I I I I G P I I G P I
GP GP GP GP GP GP GP
L-----J I I I I I I I I I I I•----- I L------ I �
L-----J L-----J L-----J I I I I ----_J _--_J
L--------------.J----L-----J >
>
Q
20' Alley
> ------
I I I f----------, -----------
�.
I I i i i i ------
-----I iCD
----- -----
PL PL PL GP GP IGP GP GP GP
I I I I
1 1 L----. I I'---------� I I I j
1 fir------------1
I I I
II 1 ------- I I I i I
Lifetime OR OR OR OR
Pro Condos ;
d,
E/P ------------
Market 4-'�, 1 1 I rt I
305 1 Apmts 317
I t I I `-------
313 1 321 323 1 325 327'
�301 309 311: L-------=---� I'--==- ----- ------
17th Street
•
Huntington Beach City Counsel vuly 21 , 1993
City of Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Council Members ,
I wish to express my position relating to zone case 92-3 , the application
for a zone change of lots #13 and #14 (311- 17th and 309- 17th) from TLSP-B
to C2.
I own the 10 unit apartment complex located at 314- 18th St. which is located
slightly to the North and across the alley from the subject property.
The applicants request for this zone change seems sensible and proper as this
will add lots #13 and #14 (311-17th and 309- 17th) to the existing C2 zone
which now includes lots #15 and #16 (3 05-17 th and 3 01-17 th) .
Lots #13 , #15 and 016 have all been developed with commercial buildings and
are used commercially. Lots #13 and #14 , which are now zoned TLSP-B should,
in my opinion, also be zoned C2.
Sincere1
I
H. C. Volker
19382 Woodland Lane
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Robert A. Lind
6021 Littlefield Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
July 6, 1993
Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach
Reference : Case 92-3
To Whom it May Concern:
I am the owner of the property at 313 17th Street .
Since there are already commercial buildings surrounding
the vacant lot at 309 17th Street it seems to me that it
is logical to extend that zoning to this vacant lot .
If you build a residential property between these
commercial properties it would certainly be less
desirable for the tenants .
There is also a parking problem evenings and weekends in
this area. Commercial property lessen this problem
because they normally require parking only week days .
For these reasons I am in favor of the zoning change .
Sincerely,
Robert A. Lind
r 11
�k
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
302 18TH ST .
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF 92648
JULY 7 , 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - REFERENCE CASE # 92-3
I RESIDE & OWN THE PROPERTY AT 302 18TH ST-CORNER OF 18TH & OLIVE
JACK ELLSWORTH'S PROPERTY AT 309 17TH ST IS IN THE MIDDLE OF 3
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THAT STRETCH OF BLOCK. I SEE NO REASON
WHY THE ZONING ON THAT LOT SHOULD BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE
COMMERCIAL ZONING SURROUNDING IT. AS A BUILDER , I WOULD NOT
WISH TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL LOTS
AND A BUYER FOR THOSE RESIDENCES WOULD BE CONSIDERING THAT
AS A LESS DESIRABLE LOCATION.
THE PARKING CONGESTION IS ON THE WEEKENDS AND NIGHTS . I DON' T
THINK THIS WOULD ADD TO THE PROBLEM BECAUSE ANY ADDITIONAL
VEHICLES FROM THE COMMERCIAL WOULD BE ON WEEKDAYS .
I AM IN FAVOR OF MR . ELLSWORTH REQUEST FOR A ZONGNG CHANGE .
RESPECTFUL, Y,
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
5u o M L-;- -f-D
*, 0LUMB' Uc*
305 SEVENTEENTH ST. • HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92646 • TEL:(714]969-2421 • FAX:960-063B
Jul,, 7, 19
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Zone Case 92-3
Members of the Planning Commission,
I wish to express my approval of the requested zone change for lots #13
and #14 (311 and 309 17th Street) from TLSPLB to C2 (Community Business).
I encourage members of the Commission to vote in favor of this zone change.
Sincerely,
J %
Paul rrolumbus
.305-17th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
William S . Snyder
Anne B. Snyder
310 - 18th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
September 2, 1993
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, CA
Re : Zone Change No. 92-3
Council Members,
With regard to Zone Change No. 92-3 , a change from TLSP-B to C2
Commercial, we wish to present our position. As owner/residents
of 310 - 18th Street, located across the alley from the subject
property, we have no objection to the applicant ' s request .
The businesses at 301, 305 and 311 - 17th Street were here when we
purchased our property. These businesses seem well-located and
add to the commercial base of the City. Further, it was our
understanding that the vacant site directly behind our property
(309 - 17th Street) was also zoned for commercial use and would not
be developed with multiple-family residential use . It has been our
experience in the past three years that the high density
residential property tend to have seasonal occupancy and create
more of a noise and police nuisance than do the existing SMALL
commercial properties .
With 301 and 305 - 17th Street already zoned C2 and having been in
commercial use for years, and with 311 - 17th Street already
developed with a compatible use, it seems only reasonable that 309
and 311 - 17th Street should also be zoned C2 .
It is our understanding that granting the applicant ' s request will
extend the existing C2 zone to include 309 and 311 - 17th Street .
This inclusion will make possible the development of the vacant lot
at 309 - 17th Street .
Respectfully,
�• e-1
P 01
September 2, 1993
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Dear Members:
I wish to express my position relating to, Zone Change No. 92-3 , a change from
TLSP-B to C2 Commercial.
I am an owner/resident at 312-18th Street, located directly across the alley
from the subject property.
The businesses at 301, 305 and 311 17th Street certainly have presented no
problems, parking, traffic or otherwise. In fact, I believe they are an
asset to the neighborhood and the city as well.
As I understand, 301 and 305 17th Street are zoned C2 and have been used
commercially for many years.
The property at 311-17th Street has also been in commercial use for many
years, however due to a zone change instigated by the City some years ago
from M2 to residential, it is now classified as a "none comforming use" in a
residential area.
The undeveloped lot at 309-17th Street, located between two commercial
buildings should be included in the C2 zone.
I believe the applicants request for a zone change from TLSP-B to C2 is a
reasonable and logical request and should be granted.
Respectf y,
Robert Meier
312-18th Street
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
0
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
3-7
N ; - , 7g 37 ; 0- 7-93
71 7 fJ
1 I
i 17647 60MR ev P w- 7-93
1 1
Aiw�-Quwll CA
u4 /,3-w,,e/ Ad Jl ZY, 13 _ ; 7-/9 - 9 3 -
S-2/
I
1 t
t
1 {
1
1 t
1
1 I
1
I I
I
1 ,
1
t
Read attachment sheet "History"
History of subject property and applicant . . .
The subject property is located in the South Westerly 150 foot of the 300
block of 17th Street, Huntington. Beach. The applicant, Mr. Ellsworth, has
owned lot #13 (311- 17th) since 1966 and lot #14 (309- 17th) since 1975.
Lot #13 (311-17th) was improved with the construction of a commercial
building in 1968 at which time the zoning of 17th Street was M2. This has
been the location of Mr. Ellsworth"s business since that time.
Lot #14 (309- 17th) is an unimproved lot. This lot is located between two
commercial buildings and is currently zoned TLSP-B (residential) .
The request is simply to extend the existing C2 zone (lot #16 (301-17th) and
lot #15 (305-17th) ) to include lot #14 (309-17th) and lot #13 (311-17t.h) .
Granting this request will correct the use designation of the subject
property and promote the sensible development of lot #14. The C,2 zone will
then be a contiguous 150 ft.
20 PL aloy
SO Feet 30 Peet 25 feet E05 Ieet
a-a o-a ILOP-D TUSP-e nsP-a
N
X �p
N 1 _E
O t+ X
61 pg
o
� � d
_O ay Reiidentnt
r � Cpb
Ga
U
313-171h St.
301-17th St. M0 17th St 399-17th St. 3U-171h St.
I�E
17+k Stroet Scdo• V161 m 1'
•
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
g eye,
n Q n Imo-\ n, l yl ; 1�o h \i CA :l,1 C.\,-n y, J i 2L,t4 0-,
00
r �•
—
-4,1 URUa05 IOq
9,
o-21,5�
r a0I
U -2.0-�3
ZZ
LY. 9A :
s-4-
.14
Read attachment sheet "History"
f4
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
rzz E`er_, sT FP-
3 7 �rl � 41.1 Gam- tc �-- 7 L,, l-
�`
zi tz d .u� c f3 . 7-22 -y3
Qa2 l OCMAI WO OV DAL ��• 8 ; 7-21. 3
qoZ► ,t9, lfB 9�.c /*770
- - --
Jz T //r,n S/-%� .:f,�� U� 2' z6�� :z 6
Read attachment sheet "History"
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
_�E3 D v rH ��� �a n 2►3 t `��-� srt- + H 13 . 8 7 t 3 -9�
-:;DO�M )
-l71_
TTJ✓Ll'iv"i Y G�-{�u'l l" ;A41MMI&AD
o?%,- /s 5 % % i .7-/ c 3
3(Z
LI
22t►� c3 •q
LA��
AR02 Mc/A
Read attachment sheet "History"
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
22
K112 A/ �2`3
"�-I r.�'��n 1 t/ L �• JtAC 1 Y V �l Lvf
� 4
V4/_
HA
C8
7
2-2-'r7 v -44, b 7a�5 �l
11-2 ZZ1. %7 9
__JCW Z3�'L/Cl'S ; `` k Cam1-7
s Dr.�`,S N-A\ \j (tA
Read attachment sheet "History"
low
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots- 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
�-t. ; ;►�. �a 2,td_fir—S� IC -
tc'C - i 7TY ' /VaVr66 e- 3A/ �Gi{ T-3 0
l
C� e- cl ��r S7L Lf �
<� --� 1
pL
2� 7A, ,
ZM
i�i-
I
Read attachment sheet "History".
• •
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
'ri' 67 , Al
4
2(0 Q WiZTI-4 71 iI � 3
; ZO kh;':'
mob
. ; 1/-6 /3D���k�`�•B, 9��5�8 ; 7-/.3- 93
1'/,g 9aZ ;V 2 -13 - 7_3
r ??2
g2 Aro.
alezzl- A/
=2v
LI
Read attachment sheet "History"
i
We the undersigned, peti0ion the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
VI LLAL3cA 4U,Q01fMJ
�c
d, IA I, Lzo to YV -7 w ,7
14�WPA-,,r -1A s ,,L3. 7 20-93
7--9 3- 3
i LP
Owx AL-LL R
- 14 Z G K,v- LA/ --Ps ctA . 7- Y 3
ki�&- tA ��a�dc�ti� 2 P it &2ti I, F I C1
-- WLTA '1 7-Z'7 J.13
C Read attachment sheet "Hist
ory"
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Peach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
-44
Ze
3
V Lo"-
Vk (At Skm�x� C�4d�,
Oar" el-Al� �
pas AC'211 �a T�'c®AR,k � ; " ,
Y
v
b8 � tp�� •��:.,` R.i`�� , /�f� ;�-" �, �_ ��1 J '` ,t ,i�� !� `g �i .1'u'"'�_. �a.,�j..' `""�
� 1
Read attachment sheet "History"
/ We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to .extend the C2
G zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
t �r. I
Name Address Date
1
92,7,
4—seU _w s ; G c�j I �f i ti -�,, (-� i3, 7 ,26`► ; ?-2-6--
1
.s Y6 9 ZG gdh 26 3
�,,20, C
/: 1 i. .i�_ �1 4 'ar ; / ( � -•y;ji ':' it !/� ' i• '�!!��!7;'=% / � �'' )�
l j 6 i 1�c�,rul &�O t�
r
-)jCJ-f11V 3 S�- P. (1k
_ I
1
1 .•b.y I
= I
_ 1
I �
1 1
I I
1
1 1
i
I �
Read attachment sheet "History"
i We the undersigned, petifon the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
A Ize—L ghh
/5 Fib�Nr<Fu�.— S- 3- 93
y� 3-
��
7961, OC7�gzE.
;
Read attachment sheet "History"
We the undersigned , petifon the Council of the Cityy4f Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th .Street.
Na Address Date
rd
2 / s'Z Ya cw `t.7
1
1
1 1
I 1
1 ,
1
1 1
1
1
I 1
1 ,
1 I
I ,
1 I
1 ,
I
1 I
1
1 ,
1 ,
I
1 ,
I
1
I 1
1
Read attachment sheet "History"
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES FOR
DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 92-34
1. Impact:
Subsequent development of the site under the proposed C2 (Community Business) zoning may potentially result
in noise, light and glare and other compatability impacts to adjacent residential units.
Mitigation:
Subsequent development of the site, under the C2 zoning, shall be subject to preparation of an intial study
to analyze the potential environmental impacts of specific development of the site. The initial study shall
be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and shall
be processed prior to or concurrently with entitlement processing.
Environmental Checklist —10— (1896D)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONE CHANGE NO.92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.92-34
(Rezone from Townlot Specific Plan to Office Professional))
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at
the Huntington Beach Civic Center,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California,on the date and at the time indicated
below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below.
DATE/TIME: Tuesday,September 7, 1993,7:00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: ZONE CHANGE NO.92-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.92-34
APPLICANT/APPELLANT: Jack H.Ellsworth
LOCATION: 309 and 311 - 17th Street
ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan-Section B
REQUEST: A zone change of an approximately 5,875 square foot area from TLSP-B(Townlot Specific Plan-
Section B)to OP(Office Professional)
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration No. 92-34 was advertised for a twenty-one(21)day public
comment period which began on May 13, 1993 and closed on June 2, 1993.
COASTAL STATUS: Not Applicable
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,
2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,or inspection by the public. A
copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall after September
3, 1993.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit to the City Clerk,written
evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Jane Madera,
Assistant Planner at 536-5271.
Connie Brockway,City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
(714)536-5227
(phzc923)
3
COVER SHEEFOR
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS
N/A YES NO
Did Wang type out City Council or Planning Commission public hearing
notice?
If appeal, are appellant and applicant shown on legal notice?
If housing is involved, is "legal challenge paragraph" included?
If Coastal Development Permit, are the RESIDENT labels attached and
is the Coastal Commission Officp on the labels?
Is Title Company letter attached? VD4S M cz'u Lgg3� ,
Were latest Assessor's Parcel Rolls used?
Is the appellant's name and address part of the labels?
Is day of public hearing correct — Monday/Tuesday?
Has the City Administrator's Office authorized the public hearing to be
set?
( ) ( ) Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council.
( ) M" ( ) Is the appellant/applicant names and addresses on mailing labels?
For Public Hearings at the City Council level please revise the last paragraph of the
public hearing notice as follows:
"ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express
opinions or submit to the City Clerk, written evidence for or against the
application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
(insert name of Planner) at 536-5227."
CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET — 2ND FLOOR
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
(714) 536-5227
13SOK - 4/93
023-156-30
023-162-22 Wil1�n S. Snyder
pz�er :S. MuYa.vl 310-�th St.
228-18th St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
i
023-156-31
023- 162-23 Robert A. Meir
Gloria S_ Stoner 312-16 th St.
226-18th St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-157-02
`0, 3-162;9A Arnold Alvarez
Ed rd-'�A. Bonilla 15592 Dawson Ln.
221- th St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647
H ' in on Beach, Ca. 92648
023-157-03
023-162-25 Robert G. Orpin
Peter J. Fehervari 3731 Greenbrier Rd.
1837 Alpha Ave. Long Beach, Ca. 90808
Pasadena, Ca. 91030
023-157-04
023-162--28 Howard E. Stein
Jerry L. Crews 51 Huntington Center Dr.
225-17th St. Huntington Beach,Ca. 92647
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
0%-
023-162-29 , —0 5
023-163-20 Cian K. Riddle
Lowell D. Zehnder 1court Rd.
206-15th St. I�6ng Kong
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023- 156-06
023-163-08 Alvin J. Fray
Mary N. Iiams P. O. Box 721
24175 Minnetonka Ln. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
E1 Toro , Ca. 92630
023-157-07
023-163-14 Hop Tai Fan
Douglas M. Moore 7681 Concordia P1.
220-17th St. Westminister, Ca. 92683
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-157-08
023-163-17 Reynaldo Lugo
Richard C. Dorn 10101 Crailet Dr.
228-17th St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-157-09
023-163-18 Dominic Guadagno
Manuael A. Damotta 9503 La Serna Dr.
226-17th St. Whittier, Ca. 90605
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
\0223157- 0023-161-06 am LHerbert V. Swanican oli e n.
17132-A Harbor Bluff Cir. ent' , S2
670
Huntington Beach, Ca . 92649
023-155- 17 023- 157-11
William A. Sarle� Glor G. May
°., 307-18th St 9431 ikinda Ave.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 La Habra, Ca. 90631
023-155-18 023-157-14
Jan D. Tatala Martha P. Ewell
105 Via Ensueno 914-10th St.
San Clemente , Ca. 92672 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-155-22 023-157-18
Barrie Dorfman Ian F. Dibblee
327- 18th St. 320-17th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-155-23 023-157-19 ,22
Stephen L. Hobson Tony Perrotto
319-18th St. 13044 Brazil
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Cerritos , Ca. 90701
023- 155-24 023-157-20
William Berman Dean Dulgarian
317-18th St. 826 E. 62nd St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Los Angeles , Ca. 90001
023-156-05 023-157-21
Clifford Bonner Chris Egan
308-18th St. 322-17th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-06 023-161-28
H. Rice Paul G. McFarland
306-18th St. 225-18th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-10 023-161-29
Richard Jeffrey James R. Zarley
17162 Gothard St. 227-18th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-15 \002213Paul S. Columbus Ma gi305- 17th St. Te ace Dr.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 c Ca. �90815
023-156-16 -023-162-14
Adel M. Zeidan Peter A. Mazzagatte
301-17th St. 8282 Monique Way
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Cypress , Ca. 90630
023-156-17 0 -. 62-1�
Henry C. Volker John Manna
19382 Woodlands Ln. P.�B 689
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 guna iguel, Ca. 92677
i
023-156-18
Robert A. Lind
6021 Littlefield Dr.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
15 6-1
Ric orchione
3 P�4q 7 th�.
I,Huntingtoir�B.each, Ca. 92648
023-156-20
Jimmy L. Long
321-17th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-22
Debra J. Mitsch
325-17th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-23
John J. McElroy
327-17th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-24
Stephen L. Philipson
328-18th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
3\31
65
a M ks
3 6Nea
Hu h, Ca. 92648
023-156-26
Terry J. Benn
32A-18 th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-27
Dean Grommet
322-18th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-28
Darryl Katz
304-18th St.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
023-156-29
Corri L. Will
302 f8H�I �Y,
023-156-18 023-156-19
Robert A. Lind John D. Rhoads
6021 Littlefield Dr. 128 Bob White Way
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Orange, CA 92669
023-163-20
Lowell D. Zehnder
206 15th St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
023-156-13,14
Jack H. Ellsworth
311 17th St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
023-155-13
Weir Oil Co.
401 20th St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
023-163-16
James E. Holton
7201 Wellesly
Westminster, CA 92683
023-162-24
Scott R. Baugh
3400 Avenue of the Stars
Unit Ci-321
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
023-163-19
Thomas E. Dunthorne Tr.
224 17th St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Norm Smith
Environmental Board Chair.
4053 Aladdin Drive
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Theresa Rey
Subcommittee Chairperson
506 12th St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i
i
1'
4. BLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST
+` MAILING LABELS •
(1211D) 3/2/93
resident William D. Holman Pla ing Director
H. Chamber of Commerce Pacific Coast Homes City Westminster
2213 Ma' St. #32 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 250 8200 We minster Blvd.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Westminst , CA 92683
Judy Legan X,19820B
. Hist. Society P1 ning Director
H.B./F.V. Board of Realtors d House Museum Cit of Seal Beach
8101 Slater Ave. h Blvd. 211 E ht St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 untington Beach, CA 92648 Seal Be ch, CA 90740
esident Chairperson CA Coastal Commission
Ami s De Bolsa Chica torical Resources Bd. Ther a Henry
P. 0. x 3748 Co Services Dept. 245 W. roadway, Ste 380
Huntingto Beach, CA 92605 2000 in St. Long Bch, CA 90802
Hunting Beach, CA 92648
Charles Grant Robert Joseph
Friends of the HB Wetlands uncil on Aging Caltrans District 12
21902 Kiowa Lane 17 Orange Ave. 2501 Pullman St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Hunti ton Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA 92705
Ruth Galanter Edna Littlebury rector
astal Conservancy Golden St. Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. Loc 1 Solid Waste Enf. Agy.
P.O. Box 66494 11021 Magnolia Blvd. O.C. ealth Care Agency
Los An 1es, CA 90066 Garden Grove, CA 92642 P.O. So 355
Santa Ana CA 92702
President \Santa
Orange/EMA Do inick Tomaino
Huntington Beach Tomorrow Ruane, Dir. Seac iff Homeowners Assoc.
411 6th St. 048 6812 S nic Bay Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CA 92702-4048 Huntingt Beach, CA 92648
u1' Vandermost
B -0C unty of Orange/EMA Hu tington Harbor HOA
2001 4th St. #224 Tho as Mathews, Dir, Planning P. 0. Box 791
Santa CA 92705 P. 0. ox 4048 Sunset each, CA 90742
Santa A CA 92702-4048
Richard Spicer
G Co ty of Orange/EMA ill Lilly
818 st 7th, 12th Floor Bob her, Dir. OA ARC
Los An les, CA 90017 P.O. Bo 4048 168 Algonquin St. #119
Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Hunti ton Beach, CA 92649
E.T.I. Corral 100 nning Dir. w Growth Coordinator
Mary Bell Cit of Costa Mesa Hun 'ngton Beach Post Office
20292 Eastwood Cir. P. 0. x 1200 6771 riser Ave.
Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Costa Mes CA 92628-1200 Huntingt Beach, CA 92647
PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST Pg. 2
(1211D)
No Smith, Environmental Pla ing Dir. Mr. Tom Zanic
Boa Chairman City Fountain Valley Seacliff Partners
4053 addin Drive 10200 S ter Ave. 520 Broadway Ste. 100
Hunting n Beach, CA 92649 Fountain lley, CA 92708 Santa Monica, CA
Pacific Coast Archaeological
ociety, Inc.
P. . Box 10926
Cost Mesa, CA 92627
Attn: ne Gothold
JERRY BUCHANAN
H6 CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
P. 0. Box 71
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
964-8888
GARY BURGNER
HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT
10251 Yorktown Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
964-3339
MARC ECKER
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
17210 OAK STREET
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
JAMES JONES
EAN VIEW ELEMENTARY
SC L DISTRICT
17200 INEHURST LANE
HUNTING N BEACH CA 92647
RON FRAZIER
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
14-121 CEDARWOOD AVENUE
WESTMINSTER CA 92683
730 1 Camino Way #200
Tustin, CA 9680
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
(1211D)
Dr. Duane Dishno
HB CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
P. 0. Box 71
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
964-8888
DAVID HAGEN
HB UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISRICT
10251 Yorktown Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
964-3339
CSA
730 E1 Camino Way #E200
Tustin, CA 9680
�-IS(�f -7fi
►(,a.{V I V1 T. A t e ks;'
Z(.07 pvt"C-L odt•1�t" W.
L"OY AUV%U I CoA
3o z44 - 3�b1
13 - IIoZ
L'13 I
Z3 Z tc,Lvi v1
Lo%w..mn CA
°ID-7zu - Zak
AM)- 0AMnc�vK,bcv cbvurn ayu
I
00 vkw v►st. 5l d k4- ion
UACln, CA
Ll2-
i
a{
023-155-07
Darrell A. Lightner
237 Canal St.
Newport Beach, Ca. 92663
023-155-09
Ralph H. Bauer
16511 Cotuit Cir.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
023- 155-12
Robert H. MacDonald
6901 Rio Vista
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92647
023-155-13 ,21
Leander M. Kelter
5362 Oceanus Dr.
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
RECE,V
William S. Snyder �
Anne B. Snyder HbruTi,�cr�x��.y,J�
310 - 18th Street -IF
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SEP 3 33 M
93
September 2, 1993
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach, CA
Re : Zone Change No. 92-3
Council Members,
With regard to Zone Change No. 92-3 , a change from TLSP-B to C2
Commercial, we wish to present our position. As owner/residents
of 310 - 18th Street, located across the alley from the subject
property, we have no objection to the applicant ' s request .
The businesses at 301, 305 and 311 - 17th Street were here when we
purchased our property. These businesses seem well-located and
add to the commercial base of the City. Further, it was our
understanding that the vacant site directly behind our property
(309 - 17th Street) was also zoned for commercial use and would not
be developed with multiple-family residential use . It has been our
experience in the past three years that the high density
residential property tend to have seasonal occupancy and create
more of a noise and police nuisance than do the existing SMALL
commercial properties .
With 301 and 305 - 17th Street already zoned C2 and having been in
commercial use for years, and with 311 - 17th Street already
developed with a compatible use, it seems only reasonable that 309
and 311 - 17th Street should also be zoned C2 .
It is our understanding that granting the applicant ' s request will
extend the existing C2 zone to include 309 and 311 - 17th Street .
This inclusion will make possible the development of the vacant lot
at 309 - 17th Street .
Respectfully,
RECEIVED-
CITY OLc"i7A
CITY 1;7
HUNNICTt h :1P , CALIF.
September 2, 1993 SEP 2 3 33 P1.1193
City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Dear Members:
I wish to express my position relating to Zone Change No. 92-3, a change from
TLSP-B to C2 Commercial.
I am an owner/resident at 312-18th Street, located directly across the alley
from the subject property.
The businesses at 301, 305 and 311 17th Street certainly have presented no
problems, parking, traffic or otherwise. In fact, I believe they are an
asset to the neighborhood and the city as well.
As I understand, 301 and 305 17th Street are zoned C2 and have been used
commercially for many years.
The property at 311-17th Street has also been in commercial use for many
years, however due to a zone change instigated by the City some years ago
from M2 to residential, it is now classified as a "none comforming use" in a
residential area.
The undeveloped lot at 309-17th Street, located between two commercial
buildings should be included in the C2 zone.
I believe the applicants request for a zone change from TLSP-B to C2 is a
reasonable and logical request and should Ibe granted.
RespZ1 .
f
Robeier
312-18th Street
Huntington Beach, Ca . 92648
�YfD
C!TY C'zzaj;
NllitTlti CITY�s
SEP
3 33 Sri
3
Huntington Beach City Counsel July 21, 1993
City of Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Council Members ,
I wish to express my position relating to zone case 92-3 , the application
for a zone change of lots #13 and #14 (311-17th and 309-17th) from TLSP-B
to C2.
I own the 10 unit apartment complex located at 314-18th St. which is located
slightly to the North and across the alley from the subject property.
The applicants request for this zone change seems sensible and proper as this
will add lots #13 and #14 (311-17th and 309- 17th) to the existing C2 zone
which now includes lots #15 and #16 (305-17th and 301-17th) .
Lots #13 ,#15 and #16 have all been developed with commercial buildings and
are used commercially. Lots #13 and #14 , which are now zoned TLSP-B should,
in my opinion, also be zoned C2.
SincereWker
2
. C. Vo
19382 Woodland Lane
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
'0096
1- Q*us
I— C *44,
•„��374j
'T� yr
September 1, 1993 Su 2 3 LR-3 fly ¢33
Council Members
City of Huntington Beach, Ca.
Dear Members:
Enclosed with this letter are copys of a petition with signatures I wish to
submit to the Council.
This petition addresseses zone change # 92-3/Negative Declaration # 92-34.
The petition respectfully requests Council Members to vote in favor of the
applicants requested zone change of lots #13 and 014 (311-17th and 309-17th)
from TLSP-B to C2 Commercial.
Respectfully,
Jack H. Ellsworth
311-17th Street
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Enclosures
(1) - Petition and Support of Applicant (Approx. 243)
(2) - Drawings (2)
(3) - Letters of Support (Submitted to Planning Commission
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
A ; -2 37 /.3 8- 7- P3
�— : 7 $ 57 ; S- 7-93
.e2 7�
71 7 -A /714S. 217 Zf3
17647 6.0T9,9RD ST
-* 3/
I'llbl t- r3��t-aWf�-S Cc� �
411 E:
wz
17
;
;
Read attachment sheet "History"
� 7
History of subject property and applicant . . .
The subject property is located in the South Westerly 150 foot of the 300
block of 17th Street, Huntington Beach. The applicant, Mr. Ellsworth, has
owned lot #13 (311-17th) since 1966 and lot #14 (309- 17th) since 1975.
Lot #13 (311-17th) was improved with the construction of a commercial
building in 1968 at which time the zoning of 17th Street was M2. This has
been the location of Mr. Ellsworth's business since that time.
Lot #14 (309- 17th) is an unimproved lot. This lot is located between two
commercial buildings and is currently zoned TLSP-B (residential) .
The request is simply to extend the existing C2 zone (lot #16 (301-17th) and
lot #15 (305-17th) ) to include lot #14 (309-17th) and lot #13 (311-17th) .
Granting this request will correct the use designation of the subject
property and promote the sensible development of lot #14. The C2 zone will
then be a contiguous 150 ft.
M ft. all.,,
50 fees 30 feet 23 feet W feet
-E C-z ILG-. ,UP-a nlP.a
tV
x
w /
m
Q X U t //' / N
n i / /
$ e
Resldentaal
f / 313-171h St.
301-17th St. 305-17th St 3Y9-lath St., 3U-17th St.
i
17th Street Scule.IAGI
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
3�I-- /3414 a 4zyb
p ,
J
lox,L 172-0 I-Je-i- 51_ 921 z-r1S
U Rua 9-Oq
bl.�v s ` �,� � 1;36 ' Out
u -2-0
41
Read attachment sheet "History"
Z c.�,
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and 414 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
,
�%'fit'/�fJ�i�'/x LN• ,�/� ►�y� ; -zi- �j
C
<7VA, /W/ 7
t 4\ Ajij;�a� e,- H 6
Qd2l Ocm&wcop OR. �-{• 8 7-22-93
/*
�/P
Cyr
C � � �/Z•.E'Ya�� ;%<S' 2 Tcz. 71C 6
z3 Read attachment sheet "History"
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
A G D v r� • - � d 4 n ; 213 ( J--�Ak s�t- �}: � 1� • 6 � 7_ �3 -93
VA
r 64ai) a:r,OF
--
�� -
l
s
nib 1�3F.
1 T
- 6en Cie C3C� a. ��� YE �•�/��� �-����
T/A VA 22 64,
fflod)v
2. 1_3
�bs a :21f 1 /J�)
Read attachment sheet "History"
Z�'
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
4�*(4VVV' ILI 6�1 CA-
IN V44
H'A
G [ [
C
� M Ak-'A'�)
If
44, n TIE:5/
�.z
46
lo
LI
_Z/
Read attachment sheet "History"
Z.L�
f ..
we the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots: 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
c, 2�
A ri'C t i c- M5:ss-E 7 .17f 1-1ayr/nJe-rp N T-3 0
lC
04 / 5/q )h P- Y
tT
zo �- !201h
Read attachment sheet "History".
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
� �.t�-.� -Ir�'vla ��v�-+ ; �✓1'1 t't '� �s7 . �'b� �l.r�• 4�U►t Z tl 93
811 r-49-Nkee—Or #3 ; 7
�all
9
71 ri 13
Gz. b�o�2e- ; y05" /3�h ��, C!¢ 5�76y8 ; 7-/3- 93
,121
of —2 V Coe 2 2 4� 2e 7
aD ' TR"- Cd It12YO 1 7-
Cgj
quo a
l g 472 Cpl�sT sfi --r-7 - 11 3
Read attachment sheet "History"
2Or
We the undersigned, pettion the Council of the Cit�of Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
�t LLA�3A ( rr �T3 ��-W XT 7'-ale �3
:�2 1." 1 - f
:3tzl i Fk 54 -
go 2 rA�-AlvT 1-�S ; 7- I�l- q.3 CL,U eo -A
DEN L( -� ►� �n « ; �7/23 �/X-3
7--
0 4 043
4r,a�6�6 h 9 zo(3-
� ,, j 8 ; � ,
OwX P-�� 0,,-) &(ES26q--9 It7-,-2 7-�3
?2-&Z// 7
141 A Z CG Kra- LA/ cA ; 7- Y 3
ROrti; 7, c1
kA ; REP (-A/ �l
AV, G1 Cc� (S T Z7 l
ead attachment sheet 'History"
vi " • •
We the undersigned, petition the Council of the City of Huntington Peach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
IS i - 1 - 3
; 7
!
Ik4� i 1Pav +4 �2,/J( 161,
,n /3 s—;oi 11,RX/VII Nwp� 1
; •� C
r V
Read attachment sheet "History"
2�
/ We the undersigned, petiloon the Council of the Citfof Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
J. 311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to .extend the C2
li zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
s
J Vk `1
Name Address Date
1 1
ell, 31,F
92
1 I
1�
;2lz 2T' 3. 2 '4
_ TI i I -/-M: f1, g' API
1 1
1
1 1
1 ,
I 1
1
I ,
1 ,
I 1
I
1
1
1 1
Read attachment sheet "History"
1
7
We the undersigned, petmon the Council of the Citoof Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311- 17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th Street.
Name Address Date
911 STt�/r �P R- - S'Z3,A,
a . o-•�-ti� s Fi�,��r�wir �- 3- 93
L
g� 3
9_3
_
I t
LAI-
I
t
I t
I
1 I
I I
1 1
I
t
1 I
I
t t
I I
i 1
t ;
I 1
1
I i
Read attachment sheet "History"
�2
We the undersigned, petiloon the Council of the Citoof Huntington Beach to
vote in favor of Zone Change # 92-3 / Negative Declaration # 92-34 (309 and
311-17th Street) , hereby granting the applicants request to extend the C2
zone (lots 15 and 16 , 17th Street) to include lots #13 and #14 , 17th .Street_
Na Address Date
2 r ?-sZ
-1—le 5ex�e -
,
Read attachment sheet "History"
OR = Owner Residence
PL = Parking Lot
GP = Garage Parking
E/P= Ellsworth Products 18th Street
302 304 306 308 310 312 314 322 324 326 328
OR OR ❑R ❑R ❑R OR Apartments ❑R ❑R 1 ❑R ❑R
� I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I 1 1 I I I I I I � � I h----- I r--_-- I
I I I G P I I G P I F-----'� F-----� F-----� I 1 I I I -----'I I -----i
--- [-----� 1 1 1 1 --------------I ---- G P 1 i G P
GP ; GP GP GP GP GP GP GP
L----- I I I I I I I I I I L----- I L----- I
L-----J L-----J L-----J I I i I I--
I ---� -----�
L______________J____L_____- >
> Q
Q
20' Alley (3)
> -----, C
I I I d
r---------i r---------1 i------------i r------------
PL PL PLC GP GP ; GP GP GP GP 1
I I I I
I I I L---------�I I I I
L------------J L----- �
I I I
I 1 r'------------1
r------------- II I -----/- I I 1 I I
Lif etime 1 Condos i OR OR OR OR
I i
1 Prod, ;
I I , E/P f------------1 I 1 I I I
1 Market '
305 1 Apmts 1 317 I
I `-----------� I
313 327
301 309 311 1 321 323 1325 -
L___________J L_--__ ____ _J L___-__
17th Street
20 ft. Alley
50 feet 50 feet 25 feet 25 feet
C-2 C-2 TLSP-B TLSP-B TLSP-B
� d
in
X ^ /r
n a
^X o
d / a N
Q N L
0 /
W 'a E
�
U C 76 u Resiole 1t19l
a p� N
C / E
e
0
U
313-171h St.
301-17th St, 305-17th St. 304-17th St. 311-17th St.
17th Street Scale: 1/16' = 1'
Sv b►�,�c�. -�O
Robert A. Lind
6021 Littlefield Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
July 6, 1993
Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach
Reference : Case 92-3
To Whom it May Concern:
I am the owner of the property at 313 17th Street .
Since there are already commercial buildings surrounding
the vacant lot at 309 17th Street it seems to me that it
is logical to extend that zoning to this vacant lot .
If you build a residential property between these
commercial properties it would certainly be less
desirable for the tenants .
There is also a parking problem evenings and weekends in
this area. Commercial property lessen this problem
because they normally require parking only week days .
For these reasons I am in favor of the zoning change .
Sincerely,
Robert A. Lind
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
302 18TH ST .
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF 92648
JULY 7 , 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH - REFERENCE CASE # 92-3
I RESIDE & OWN THE PROPERTY AT 302 18TH ST-CORNER OF 18TH & OLIVE
JACK ELLSWORTH'S PROPERTY AT 309 17TH ST IS IN THE MIDDLE OF 3
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THAT STRETCH OF BLOCK. I SEE NO REASON
WHY THE ZONING ON THAT LOT SHOULD BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE
COMMERCIAL ZONING SURROUNDING IT. AS A BUILDER , I WOULD NOT
WISH TO BUILD RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL LOTS
AND A BUYER FOR THOSE RESIDENCES WOULD BE CONSIDERING THAT
AS A LESS DESIRABLE LOCATION.
THE PARKING CONGESTION IS ON THE WEEKENDS AND NIGHTS . I DON 'T
THINK THIS WOULD ADD TO THE PROBLEM BECAUSE ANY ADDITIONAL
VEHICLES FROM THE COMMERCIAL WOULD BE ON WEEKDAYS .
I AM IN FAVOR OF MR . ELLSWORTH REQUEST FOR A ZONGNG CHANGE .
RESPECTFUL Y,
CARL E WILL
WEST WIND BUILDERS
COLUMBUt%.
305 SEVENTEENTH ST. • HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 9264e • TEL:17141 969-2421 • FAX:960-0638
Jul j 7, 1793
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
City of Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Zone Case 92-3
Members of the Planning Commission,
I wish to express my approval of the requested zone change for lots #13
and #14 (311 and 309 17th Street) from TLSP-B to C2 (Cormxanity Business) .
I encourage members of the Commission to vote in favor of this zone change.
Sincerely,
Paul Columbus C�
305-17th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
b7/e7/73 10-16( $ (14 b7:) MVV VCv Vcri
TO: Mayor Winchell and City Council Members
FROM: Dianne Easterling, Sth Street resident
DATE: 6 September 1993
.SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS OF 7 SEPTEMBER 1993
ITEM D-2: ABDELMUTI APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION
OF JULY 20, 1993, LIMITING SIGNAGE LETTERING HEIGHT TO
19" IN LIEU OF REQUESTED 24" FOR JACK'S SURFBOARDS.
On July 20th, the Planning Commission approved Planned Sign Program No. 93-1
and Special Sign Permit 93-24 (with conditions). These conditions limited tenant
sign letter height to 19", instead of 24". The Downtown Design Guidelines allow
18" high letters. Abdelmuti was also granted 83 square feet of signage in lieu of
77 square feet. Additional special considerations for this "local landmark" are
unnecessary simply because the business has been here since 1961 .
I respectfully request your ggnsideration to deny the appeal for 24" high letters.
and uphQlding the Planning Commissioner's_.0ecision of July 20th, 1993. The other
g_IYgrnative would be to deny special__condisiQns already givers and follow the
Downtown Design Guidelines. _D�Z
ITEM D-3: ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AT 309 & 311 17TH STREET FROM
TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN T01 OFFICE PROFESSIONAL.
The property in question is designated Medium Density Residential. The rezoning
requested by the landowner from Townlot Specific Plan, Sec. B to C2 Commercial
Business, does not conform in size or use with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan nor would the rezoning be consistent or compatible with surrounding
residential land uses. Additionally, Planning Commision action of July 71h, 1993,
approving Zone change No. 92-3 from TLSP-13 to Office Professional is also non-
conforming in size and use and incompatible with surrounding residential uses.
Please consider the action requested on ATTACHEMENT NO. 4 'FINDINGS FOR
DENIAL - ZONE CHANGE NO. 92-3 (Page .31 of the staff report) which is
recommended by Staff, denying a zone changp,-o-g residential neig-hborhood on
17th Street.
Thank you.