Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeabridge Specific Plan - E of Beach Blvd and Sof Adams Ave �. 1� ORDINANCE NO. 2606 AN 6ADINANCE OP THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDINO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDING THERETO ARTICLE 930 REFERENCING SPECIFIC PLANS The City Council of the City of Huntington Teach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The Huntington Beacb Ordizaance Mode is emended by adding thereto Article 930 entitled , "Specific Plans, " to read ' as follows : 9300. SPECIFIC PLANS . The following specific 9plans are en file in the office of the City Clerk and the Department of Development Services : (a) Seebridge Specific Plan . .� (b) Huntington Harbor Bay Club Specific Flan. SECTION 2 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty day4 after adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Peach at a regular meat.':.ng thereof held on the,. 2ZOd 83. day of+,February 1, 9 Mayorz 1% ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: A f' • �t f City er City Atto ey REW AND APPROV9b: INITIATED AND APPROOVED% y ra r -tor ve bpmen Services ahb. (2) 2606 SrA.ts or Cht.al'OMIA COtWff of OUNCE ..: d 19 ALICIA M. VEMW T'Hl the duly oloctad, qualif Lod City Clark of the ""ity, of Huntington baach and am-officio Clark of the City Coun%il of the said City, do heroby certify that the whale ma�ber of wmbere of the City Council of the City of Huntington beach to seven; thit the foregoing ordinance wa• ravd to said City Yauncil at a regular watin►g thateof held an the 7th_ day of _�,� 19_ a, and waa again read to 611d City Council at a regular meeting ther*of held on' the 2 nd day of ,February, � 19, 3 and wits passed and adopted by the affirmative rote of more than a rrsority of all the members of said City Council. MS.. Councilmen: Patti jon, : AacAl l i rateWr. Mandi c, Ke11y ,._ Mi MS: Councilman: ThMAS, Finely. Bailey ■ s� �w� �Y rr . w.���w�.rrww.�r.w�.��wrrr.r.i.��...�.r�� . ASSERT: Coweilmen: 1hne fit.► Qerk said ex-officto Clark of the City CA"Mcil of t1w City of amtt:ingtm leach, California ORDINANCE NO. 2546 AN ORDINANCE OP'-.THE CITY OT ,:HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDYNO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH -ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION ,9662` THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR ',CHANGE OF ZONING `FROM COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT, 'RESIDENTIAL AORICULTOAL ;,DZSTRICT, COMBINED WV.'H OIL PRODUCTION, IOW-DENS ITY RESIDENTIAL '; ISTRICT , COMBINED WITH OIL P_R0- DUCTION, AND '",'SOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DIS,r^' 1', COMBINED WITH 011, OIL PRODUCTION TO SEABRIDQF SPECIFIC PLAN ON HEAL PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTIl OF ADAMS AND EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD ( ZONE CASE NO . 81-15 ) WHEREAS , pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach. City Council have had separate public hearings rel.atlye to Zone �._ Case No. 81-15 wherein both bodies have careruuy considered all. information presented at said hearings , and after due con- sideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all. evidonee presented to said City Council , the City Council finds that such zone change la proper, and consis- tent with the general plan , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows SECTION 1. The following described sixty acres, more or less , of real. property, generally located south or Adams Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard , 1,e hereby changed from CP, "Community Business District, " RA-0, "Residential Agricultural Distriwt, ". combined with oil production, Ri.-0, "Low-density Residential tiffs trict " combined with oil r p oduction; and R1-01, " Low-density Residential Die trial, " combined with 01 oil. production , to a ea bri fte Specific Plan Parcel 1 and 2 in the city or Huntington s arhb r Beach ae per map tiled filed in Book 154, pages 11 and 12 or Parcel Mans in the orrice or ne County Recorder of Orange County; and Parcel 3 In the city or Huntington Beach, as per map Piled in Book 419 page 24 or Parcel !daps In the ornie or the County Recorder or said county. SECTION 2. The Development Services Director is hereby di- rected to Amend Section 9061 , District Map 13 (Sectional. Dis- trict Map ?-o-ll ) to reflect Zone Case No. B1-15 , described in Section l hereof. A copy or said district map , as amended hereby is avail.a6le for inspection in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall. bake effect thirty days after its adoption . PASSED AND A t!'JPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereor held on the 5th day of ATri'� , 1982. ,fr"� rw Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: � a City' Clerk ' City Attorney r� REVIEWED ANU APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: C].ty Admin trat rector o'r Delie .opment Services 2. too DM 13 t 'SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAC' 12 - 6 -11 '" IJi/11Y ui^►11 1N0 N'Qrr CITYO uwvrtC t.11 M. \ K"! �u0 s� M. D► ww•rr r- w• r w N. .1 9 • f h fit. 1 1 rl '411 L1 /1" eot 1! \•\. •N 1 1 y oa , r�U Wu 11 11 VIA m fi,Ift gt�tLY•.• HUNTINGrFON BEC� :: 0:; "? some .:4 wr, 1•fu .ar f•1►\ lM I":� •••/ ,Nr rt..w pt•q/ .fat 1.,1. I ,\ N e \ tic al.../. n+-•w lfrwt. ORANG* E COUNTY, CALIFORNIA # • A•11 LN rr•r.r.nr•,r•Iq,N N•n N•N• AWMWV MT Z MC CASE W•trra •r.n•n1,ft .f•,.r 4l,IM,M.IA,II1,n" 304 lR 2".ML 1 1 ar IIk ! 1• I I!k Mf• llMOII at two C." p 11•Il',►1�lt n7l!•1 •2.►!•61t!IMp•►IN\ 1 N $rA. rH• 1.1, h .4r• lv460901-1 1•rt•1 Ir•q„. %4w ADAMS v Its •r r►QI an (r: J , ` ----- 'L- - - IL ` R II '----1►.t tRI „� RI-0 !! CE III RI hi pl RI f RI . RI RI 1M P, ED RI R1 0 PA(X RI r T RI R, t. wr_ R1 i. a.e 0. - iI RI tr RI RI RI I// I t } R I RI Ri RI A.p I� l PI . J ►w,u, r• j•�f is •:.d CF-Re l RI R1 iRI rR1R, T RI CF-E 1 C2� {� '� + ql RI ► I ,?i RI ►: . .♦ ••r1 Ri • 1 ' +.. iw• t � JR RI ti • RsJr 11i.;ti t RI • 'J h, CF•R RI RI Idt Rt pt RI .. t / •w 4 RI RI � r_ �! •� R1 c pI _ RI ;L RI RJ ..'....`_A 7 Rl pl I Al S RI CI �� 1 I RI 11 lrl ♦t' �� r Al CF-E ,r♦15r.♦ r•.t Cis �► 111 ' RI R, R! AI • RI c RI I� i` �. i w • RI i { ( R, RI RIRIn l RI �♦ ��, • RI RI y A1L"1A W� • zC81 — is Ord. Ho. 2546 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUMI'Y OF ORANGE CITY OF ItUttTIMG'TOR REACH ) I1 ALICIA M. VEM ORTH, the duly elected, qualified Clay Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex•officio Clerk of the City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members, of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1, th-_ day of larch 19_BL, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of Apri1 19 $2 , and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members - said City Council. AYES: Councilmen: MaW lister Finley, Mandit Kell NOES: Councilmen: Thomas ABSENT: Councilmen: Pattinson, Bailey City Clerk ,and ex-officio Clerk of the City CouncU of the City of Huntington Death, California 1j t R 1 ORDINANCE NO , 2550 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 13 TO INCORPORATE SEABRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN ` WHEREAS, after notice duly given pursuant to Gove%�nment Code section 65500, the Planning Conunisnion of the City of a Huntington Beach held a public hearing on Seabridge Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report No. 81-3 on January 19 , 1982 which was continued to February 2 , 1982 , and concluded on f February 17 , 1982 ; and Adoption of Seabridge Specific Plan , covering sixty acres more or less, located south oi` Adams Avenue ;and east of Beach Boulevard, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A , is the most desirable method of providing regulated development of the area include! within said specific plan in accord with the object1ve' s set out in such specific plan; and On Narch 15, 1982 , after notice duly given, hearing was held before this Council on Seabridge Specific Plan and Environ- mental Impact Report No . 81-3 , and the Council finds that such specific plan is necessary for the orderly, regulated development of the real property included within Seabridge Specific Plan, and finds that the policies and procedures set out in such specific plan are satisfactory and in agreement with the general concept as set out in the city' s General Flan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : I . District Map 13 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Is hereby emended to incorporate Seabridge Specific plan. 1 _Y i 2. Seabridge Specific Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby approved , and copies of such specific plan shall. be maintained for inspec- tion in the office of the City Clerk and the Department of revelopment Services. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Reach at a regular mee tiro►3 thereof held on the, 5ttj- day oY'.._,_..Apri 1 1982 . I • Mayor ATTF,ST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: /wo" City Clerk CI t.y Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Adminis trato Ire c:toAof evetopment Services r� i 2. A. ` d. Ho. 2550 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY or ONAMCE ) att CITY Of' Htll'fPINCTON BEACH ) I, ALrciA M. wemoRm the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officto Clerk of the City Council of the said CLty, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington leech is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15 h, day of March 19_QL, and was again read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of April , l9 82 , and was passed and adopted by the affirrmattve vote of more than a majority of all the a*mbers of said Cf.ty Council . AYES: Councilmen: MacAllisterr Finley, Mandic! Kelly �r irwi r r.r-+ NOES: Councilmen: Thomas ASSBMT: Councilmen: Patti nson , Ba i l ee'.�..__._. L0/ 04?�C� City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California RESOLUTION NO . 5095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING SEABRIDOE SPECIFIC PLAN (BEACH/ADAMS) WHEREAS, after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code section 65500 , the Planning Commission of the City of Huntr;:gton Beach held public hearing on Seabridge Specific Plan on January 19, 1982 which was continued to February 2 , 1982 , and concluded on February 17 , 1982 ; and Such specific plan provides for development within a 60 ± acre elte, located south of Adams Avenue and east or Beach Boulevard ; and On March 1 , 1982 , after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code section 65507 , hearing was held before this Council. on Seabridge Specific Plan , and the mattes, having been consideved , the Council finds that such specific plan is consis- tent with the city ' s general. plan , and would not be detrimental to the general health , wet fare , safety and convenience of persons working or vesid ing In the immediate vicinity; and The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of the Seabridge- Specific Platt to this Council , NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of funtington Beach that .Seabridge Specific Plan , as incor- porated in the document attached hereto , and by this reference made a part hereof , is her eoy adopted . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council. of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1 5th day of Me rch , 1982. ATTEST r_ C17ty Mayor �� "_ _ `� — ahr 2/19/82 1 . r REVIEVED hND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ity Admin rator C ty Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: -Al irPcto o . Development Services 2. . F.ce. mo. 5995 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTX OF ORA1i'CR CITY 4T 11MINGTON DUCO ) Tv ALICIA M. WUMV0 R'I'H, the duly elected, qualified City Cleric of the City of Huntington Beath, and a%-officto Clerk of the City Council of acid City, do hereby certify that the whole number of memberee of the City Countil of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that th& foregoing resolution vna paused and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the rembe3rn of said City Council at a regular meeting theraof held on the 1,5 dwy► of Mdrrh _, 19 fl2 by the follcwtng vote: AYES-. Counr-t lmen: M Allistery Pattinson, FinleX, Bailey, Mand Ke„� 1 �„ �,__ 01 NOES.. Councilman% Thanas ADSEM: Ctrincilmen: None • Gee� ..s' City Clerk and es•ofEficio Cleevk of the City Council of the City of Huntington each. Crlifen sin I �1 1 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION om February 1902 Subrnk ed to. Honorable Mayor and City Counc i 1 .t : Charles 19. Thompson, City Administrat" Prepered by: Jnmes W. Paiin, Director of Development Services sobjec+t: ZONE CHANGE N0. 81--15/CODE AMENDMENT NO. 81-16/E IAONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 81-3 (SEABRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN).. Summit of Issue, Reoomnendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Action:, Attsd~ts' STATEMENT OF ISSUE: i Transmitted for the City Council ' s consideration are code amendment anj zone change applications which Mould establish a specific plan on 60_ acres of property located south of Adams Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend that the Citu Council certify EI;t 81-3 , approve Code Amendment 81-16 by resolution and Zone Change 81-15 pursuant to the attached ordinance. ANALYSIS : A22licant: Mola Development Corporation 808 Adams Avenue Huntington: Beach, California 9264S Location: The subject site is located south of. Adams Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard. Request: A zone change and code amendment which would establish a specific plan on the subject site . Planning Commission Action on February 2, 1982 : ON MOTION BY MAHAFFEY AND SECOND BY KENEFICK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 81-3 WAS CERTIFIED AS BEING ADEQUATE FOR 1tE.-OMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE FOLLOWING VOTEr AYES: Kenefick , Paone, WYnchell, Porter, Mahaffey NOES: Bannister, Schumacher ABSENT: None A68TAIN: None ,L Plinning Cc i.nsion •Ac tion an February 17, 1982: ON,:MDTIAN BY P—ORnI AND S1 OMMJ NY KEItEFICR SONE 'CHANGS 100 IllM13 � MAf APPB 41M ft ' 1kt C01 f IN TO 4'WS ' CITY CMWIL Pat ADO"TOW 010 1i Page Z BY THE F' r VOTE: o ��,uwxNc � � AYES: tienefick, Winchell , Porter, Prone , Mahaffey NOES: Schumacher ABSENT: Bannister ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK CODE A.MENDME!4T NO. 81--16 WAS APPROVED FOR RECORKENDATION TO THE CITY COUVCIL FOR ADOPTION BY RESOLUTION (RESOLUTION NO. 1282) , BY THE For,LOWING VOTE : AYES : Kenefick., 1 inchell , Porter, haone, Mahaffey NOES: Schumacher 'ABSENT: Bannister ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: in June, 1981, the City Council adopted %qnd Use Element Amendment No 81-1 changing the General Plan designation on the aubjett property from Resource Production, General Commercial, and Low Density Residen- tial to Planned Communii:y and directed that this designation be im- plemented through the development of a specific plan. The City Council. approved the General Plan kmendment subject to five policies intfinded to guide development of the specific plan . The five policies aril stated In the attached January 19, 1982 Planning Commission staff re- port . The Snabr:idge Specific Plan was prepared by the applicant and submitted to tho Department of Development Services for review. City staff pro- vided to the applicant general guidelines pertaining to the dev�slopment of Vie specific plan prior to the commencement of work on the document. An environmental impact report (EIR 81-3) was prepared, assessing the draft specific plan document and a site plan for development of the property (see environmental status) . The EIR presents a detailed assess- ment of the existing environmental setting, th., project, r,•r-aject- related impacts, alternatives, and measures intended to mitigat;o adverse environmental impact . Hearings were held by the Planning Commission: on the project at ` its January. 19, February 2 , and February 17, 1982 regular meeLings At the February 2 meeting , the ErR was recommended for certiftcation amid the specific document was given an in-depth review by the Planning C�omunis- sion. A list of 29 concerns was compiled from the Planning Comr4asia'Ps testimony. These concerns are addressed by the applicant in the,, attached letter dated February 10 , 1982. i At the February 17 Planning Cor►tm.i.ssion meeting, the. applicant' s `z�.e- sponses to the iesues identified. by the Planning Commission at ttie February, 2 meating were presented . The Commission concurred with �th revisions suggested by the applicant and stated some additional Coln- corns which have: been responded to in the attached letter subm i t t :, by the applicant daied 'February l.s , 1902. The applicant has alma �tuD t1 , Pe4,* 3 "Mitted a revised specific plan document which incorporates , all of the revisions previously suggesteL by staff and the Planniiiq Com•- mission. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Environmental Impact Report No . 81-3 provides an assessment of the proposed specific plan and development plans for a 744-unit residen- tial project on the site. The residential project is subject to the approval of tentative lZract and conditional use permit applications by the Planning Commission . Prior to taking action on the code amendment (Scabridge Spy-cific Plan) and zorie change applications: the City Council must determine that the environmental impact report is adequate and conforms with the re- quiremerits of the California Environmental Quality Act and State EIR guidelines. The Planning Commission, at its February 2 , 1982 hearing, recommended that the City Council find the EIR as being adequate and in conformance with CEQA . In the attached letter dated February 16 , 1982 the State Department of Fish and Game claims that the City' s response to their comments expressed in a letter dated December 28 , 1981 is inadequate by stand- ards of CEQA. Specifically, the Department of Fish and Game cites a< recent court decision (Cleary vs . County of Stanislaus) which requires that comments received by a Lead Agency be responded to in detail giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions were not accepted and stating Factors of importance warranting an override of the suggestions . On February 25 , 1982 City staff met with representatives of the State Department of Fish and Game and State office of Planning and Research to discuss the City' s response to Fish and Game ' s comments . It was agreed that the City would reorganize and expand its response to emphasize more clearly the reasons why specific suggestions con- tained in the Department of Fish and Game ' s comments were not accepted . The City ' s revised response to Fish and Game ' s comments is attached . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Alternatives available to the City Council regarding the proposed specific plan are to deny the applications or modify provisions con- tained_ within this specific plan document in any manner deemed appropriate by the Council . r SUPPORTING INFORMATIONS 1 . Azaa Map 2 . Planning. Commission Feb. 17, 1982 staff report and minutes 3 . Planning Commission Feb. 2, 1982 staff report and minutes 4 . Planning Commission Jan. 19, 1.982 staff report, and minutes 5 . ordinance (Zone Change 81-15) 6 . Resolution No. 1282 (Seabridge Specific Plan) 7. Letters from Mola Development Corporation dated January 8, February 10, and February 18 , 1982 8. EIR 81-3 9. Letter received and dated Feb. 18, 1982 10. Letter from State Department of Fish and Game dated . Feb. 160 1982 11. City ' s response to State Department of Fish and Game' s comments r 12. Final EIR 81-3 JWP:JRH:df } Fm on III Ri , I R! 1 R -el '-C , t t at c 1 RI 1 ! Ri �! RI Ott ✓ Rt RI r w .a •Q'i-C -Oi -O -O ;3•p RI.O 4 .� y t .� ^� .r.J at Rl mail ! .a .s•tv -- 1 R RI RI RI RI -a L ,�. RI / : RI t � �. �afiso � � f—=—»-^ _»...a.�a.t:� ; � R! RI Ott s Ito -Ra 0 R1 wi Ca !! RI C� 1 P RI RI ! s R! Rr �aax j, �. _ i c RI 1i S .17 R! • L N ►�� *s 1 Ri Rt R! IBM I ' +rs I111 All • e R� RI RI on • !•► RI • in Rt Cl J LFJ I E - J unit E RA-0. KA-o1 .11 -011-Qt.C2 M SFABRID&F SPEC)f ac PLAN lRA1M+G10�Macao flL MWGTGN MACH nANNW& Or-VISION huntkigton imiach developmkAt services department SA -REPORT..---- f TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: January 19, 1982 ;ONE CHANGE N0. 81-15�-CODE ABEND►y dT NO2 81-16 /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 81-3 AgPLICANT: Mola Development Corp. DATE ACCEPTED: 808 Adams Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 December 1, 1981 E UEST: To permit a chanan in MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE:: zone from R1-0, Rl--01, r2A-O, 60 days from certification RA-01 a nd C2 to Seabr edge of the final EIR Specific Plan . ZONE: R1..-0, R1- 01, RA-00 LOCATION : Subject properties are RA-01 and C2 located on the southeast GENERAL PLAN: corner of Adams Averse _ Planned Conununity and Beach Boulevard . ACREAGE: 60± acres EXISTING USE: Vacant/Resource production 1 .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that Code Amendment No. 81-16 (Seabridge Specific Plan) be adopted by Resolution and Zone Change No. 81-'15 be approved subject to the findings contained in Section 7. 0 . Staff further recommends that the Commission recommend to the Council that EIR No. 81.-3 be certified as adequate and in conformance with the State EIR Guidelines. L CCE TERM. INFORMATION: Code Amendment No. 18- 16 and Zone Change No. 81- 15 would establish a Specific Plan on 60 � acres of property located south of Adams Al ►, %Pkf CA 81-16 & ZC 81-15 January 19, 1982 Page 2 ;. Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard. In June, •1981 , the City Council adopted Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-1 changing the General plan designation on the property from Resource Production, General Commercial and Low Density Residential to Planned Community, and directed that this designation be implemented through the development of a specific plan. The City Council approved the General Plan Amendment subject to the following policies intended to guide development of the specific Plan. 1 . The area east of the flood control channel adjacent to the existing single family residential tracts be of a low density residential design with an adequate setback to buffer the two projects. 2. The area east of and immediately adjacent to the flood control channel be of a medium density residential design . 3 . All units east of the flood control channel be clustered to allow for a maximum as:.Uunt of open space, total units not to exceed 400 east of the channel . 4 . The ar^a west oc the flood control channel be of a high density residential design. This concept should take advantage of the natural topography for development and simultaneously preserve - , the ponding area in a natural state. 5. Residential units be clustered throughout the project area which would also accommodate the continuation of resource production activities . Total units for the overall project not to exceed 800 . The Seabridge Specific Plan (distributed previously) was prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City for review. City staff pro- vided to the applicant general guidelines pertaining to the development of a Specific Flan prior to commencement of work on the document. .An Environmental Impact Report (EYR 81-3) was prepared assessing the draft Specific Plan document and a site plan for deveLopment of the site (see Section 4 . 0 Envlronmental Status) . The ELK presents a detailed assessment of the existing envirormiental setttinq, the project, project-related impacts, alternatives and mea.iures intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts . 3 . 0 SUMMR, X OF ISSUES: The major issues of concern regarding Code Amendment No. 81-16 (Sea- bridle Specific Plan) and Zone Chanqe No . 81-15 are as follows : 1 . Whether the proposed project is in conformace with the .:ity ' s General Plan. cA ei-16 i ZC 81-.15 January 19, 1982 Page-3 2. whether th4 proposed project is consistent with the policies adopted by the City Council to provide guidedance for the de-- velcipment of a specific playa. 3 . Whether the proposal incorpor:tes mitigation measures presented in FIR 81--3. 4. 0 SURROUNDING - LAND USES ZONING AND GENE L PLAN DESIGNATION: eject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planned Community ZONE: RA-01, R1-�O, R1-010 C2 LAND USE: Vacant/oil production facilities South cE Subject Property: 6 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial/Low Density Residential ZONE: C2/R1 LAND USE: Commercial/single family residential West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: Old Town Specific Plan LAND USE: Single family homes North of Sub-tectProRerty: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial/Low Density Residential ZONE: C2/R1 LAND USE: Commercial/single family residential East of Subject Property,: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 LAND USE: Single family homes 520 ENYIR�OHM�ENTA[- STATUS : in July, 1981; . the Development Services Department was requested by the Mola Development Corporation to waive the initial study process and proceed directly to the. preparation of an ErR for the project. The environmental consulting firm of EDAW, Incorporated was engaged to prepare the EIR. EiR 81--3 provides an assessment of the proposed specific plan,,and 0 development plans for a 744-unit residential project on the site. A drdEt EtR was prepared and distributed to public agencies and indi- viduals for a 45-day review period ending January 4, 1982 . CA 81-16 b ZC 61-15 January 19, 1982 f Page 4 The enclosed final EIR which consists of the draft EIR, comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR, a list of persons, organi- zations and public agencies commenting on the draft EIR, and the City' s responses to the significant environmental points raised during the review and consultation process . Prior to taking action on the Code Amendment (Seabridge Specific Plan) and Zone Change applications, the Planning Commission must determine that the Environmental Impact Report is adequate and conforms with re- quirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and State EIR Guidelines . 6 . 0 ANALYSIS : The Seabridge Specific Plan was prepared by the applicant with consul- tation from Development Services Department ntaff and the EIR consul- tant. The Specific Plan contains redulations which will implement policies applied specifically to this site by the City Council during the General Plan amendment process . The Specific Plan combines stan- dard zoning regulations, special site development standards and measures intended to eliminate adverse environmental effects, into one document tailored to the needs of this particular site. The Specific Plan divides the site into two areas - Area A located east of the flood control channel and Area D located west of the flood control channel , The development standards for Area A provide for the construction of up to 400 attached residential units of medium and low density design. Sub-area Al as delineated on Exhibit A of the Specific Plan, contains provisions for a reduced building height envelope requiring a lower building height (maximum 25 feet) and greater setback from adjacent single family homes for all units located along the south and east property lines . The applicant plans to de- velop Area A in its entirity with 400 one and two-story attached units over tuck-under parking arranged in individual building clusters of 4-6 units . Area B located west of the flood control channel provides for the con- struction of up to 400 residential units of high density design . Sub- area 81 located at the northwest corner of the site, provides the op- tion of including commercial uses or elderly housing within the project . If Sub-area B1 is developed commercial, the Specific Plan requires that the total number of residential units allowed in Area 8 be reduced to 350. Presently, the applicant plans to develop Area © (exclusive of Sub--area 61 ) with 344 units located in several structures up to four stories in height over parking garages . They Specific Plan reclu .lations provide for an open space concept which includes extensive landscaping with specimen trees and ponds located throughout the interior of the development. Exhibits providing for J specific treatment of setbacks and visual screening are contained �,,� CA 81-16 6 ZC 81-.15 � .r January 19, I TR2 Page 5 within the Specific Plan text. A natural salt water marsh designed to the standards delineated in Exhibit b of the Specific Plan will be developed on the site to mitigate the tclnediato lass of a degraded coastal marsh habitat area within and surrounding an existing pond. The Specific Plan provides that existing resource production areas be deeded to the homeowners association and cioveloped as part of their permanent common, open space when all oil production activity has ceased. A special interest bearing account with funds initially deposited by the applicant, will be established in the name of the homeowners asso- ciation for eventual improvement of the resource production areas. The staff has conducted a detailed review of the draft Specific plan document and is recommending the following changes, many of which have been agreed to by the applicant (see attaeh%:d letter from Mola De- velopment Corporation dated January 8, 1982) . 1 . Page 1 , Section 'A, Intent and PurMse. Change title from "Intent and Purpose" to "Purpose" . 2 . Add a definitions section to the Specific Plan text . 3 . Page 2, Section A4 . The portion of this section which is in parent**N thesis shall be placed as a footnote at the bottom of the page . 4 . Page 3, Section C, -Environmental Assessment. This section shall be deleted from the report . 5 . Exhibit A, Reference Map. The map shall bw, revised to include the Following : a . The streets opposite the main entries will be shown on the map. b. The drilling islands and the main off-island wells will be shown on the map . c. The reduced building height envelope shall be clarified . 6 . Page 7, Section E, X-2juaLL-Ern tic tjpO. Thts section shall be re- written as Eollows : All development within the Specific Plan area shall conform to all federal emergency management agencies (FEMA) flood protection requirements subject to approval of the City Director of Public Works . 7 . P ge 8, Section G, Traffic Control. The second paragraph shall be revised to read Yi-followsi Me developer shall provide for the future installation of any such improvements prior to the issuance of building perm# ts. 8 . Pau_- S. Section 8, TEgVItt Facilities . ProvisLon9 within this section shit 11 be revised to include review by both the bepartmont CA 81-.16 & ZC 81--15 %#ao � January 19, 1982 Page 6 of Public Works and the Orange County Transit District. 9 . Page 9, Section J. HYdrolog . Provisions in this section shall be revised to include review by both the Department of Public Works and the Department of Development Services . 10 . Page 9 , Section L, Perimeter Buffer. The last sentence shal� be revised to read as follows: The final landscape plan shall be approved by the Department of Development Services . 11 . Page 10, Section M, Resource Production Areas . Sub-section 1 shall be revised to read as follows: The areas presently desig.- hated fpr resource production shall be deeded to the Homeowners Association as part of the permanent common open space when all oil production activity has ceased . Sub-.section 3 shall be revised to read as follows: oil production activity shall be in compliance with Title 15 of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code, Sub-section 5E at-all be revised as follows% The area east of the flood control channel (Area A) shall be approved according to the preliminary landscape plans submitted with the application for development. 12. Page 11 , Section 0, Development Standards . a . Sub-section 1 (uses permitted) shall be revised as follows : QC. A footnote shall be added to Sub-sections A and B to indicate that oil prcduction within the oil. drilling i.slands shown on Exhibit A shall comply with provisions of the --01 district (Article 968 ) of the Hunti.ington Beach Ordinance Code and that areas designated as off-island well sites shall be subject to the requrr.ements of the 110" district (Article 968) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Coda. b. Sub-secti.an 3 (Building Height ) ; this section shall be revised as follows : Area B - five stories or 60 feet. c. Sub-sc- tion 4 (Site Coverage) ; this section shall be revised as follows : Area A -- 45% of net acreage ; Aren B - 50% of net acreage . d . Sub-section 5 (Perimeter Setback) ; the last sentence shall be revised to read as follows : This requirement shall not apply to entry monuments, landscape features, and structures intended for safetF or public use. e . Sub--section 6 (Building Separation and Setback) ; this section shall be revised as follows: Sub-section D; between buildina= side-to-side, 20 feet . Area B ; The minimum separation be- tween buildings shall be 35 feet . f. Sub-section 8 (Comruon Open Space) : this sc.-tion shall be rc- viaed as fol lows t Area B: The area set aside for cearuson open space sha l l be. egll ik'a lent to 40% of the dross hab i tablr. area bit CA 81.-16 it zC 81-15 ` January 19, 1982 Page 7 �1 4 of the residential units. q. ExbIbit a: This exhibit shall be revised to include a IC foot planter area along the property line. ECCMMSH T xON s Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval, to the City Council of Code Amendment No. 81--16 (Seabridge Specific Plan) by Resolution and subsequently by Ordinance subject to the following findings and with the revisions in the Specific Plan text as stater! in Section 6 . 0. Staff also .recommends that the Planning Commission re- commend approval to the City Council of Zone Change No. 81-.15 subject t to the following findings. r 1 . The Specific Plan is in conformance with the City' s General Plan. Y 2 . The Specific Plan contains regulations necessary to implement specific policies set forth by the City Council for development of this site. z 3. The Specific Plan contains regulations which effectively mitigate adverse environmental impacts identified in EIR 81-.3 . gTTACHM£h"T5: 1 . Area Map 2. Seabridge Specific Plan (distributed previously) 3 . Environmental Impact Report No. 81-3 4 . Letter from Mola Development Corporation dated January 8, 1982 5. Ordinance (Zone Change No. 81-15) 6 . Resolution No. 1282 (Seabridge Specific Plan) JRf3 :,j lm �l Minutes, H. 8. Planning Commission January 19, 1982 Page 2 The Ccnunissioneyrs discussed the need For, at least, a sevem Foot apron for the front-entry garage for safety reasons. C(mmissionerx did agree that the, property owner should be entitled to the same advantages of the newer residences being built. Commissioner Kenefick stated that with the cost of housing, we need to make it possible for people to stay in their homes and remodel . A MOTION WAS MADE BY MAHAFFEY AND SECONDED BY BANNISTER TO OVERRULE THE 82A DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 81-49 AND APPROVE SAME, THIS MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Porter, Mahaffey, Bannister NOES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher ABSENT: Paone ABSTAIN : None A MOTION WAS MADE. BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY BANNISTER TO OVERRULE THE BZA DENIAL AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-49 WI'TEi THE: FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL : 1 . Based on testimony presented to the Planni'ny Commission at the public hearing, the Commission has determined that exceptional circumstances do exist that would deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties in the vicinity. ? . The granting of Condi tuna 1 Exception No . 81-49 would not con- stitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon properties in the vicinity . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The site plan received and dated January 14, 1982, shall be the approved layout , except that the addition at the rear of the dwelling shall be permitted to encroach only to within eight (8 ) feet of the rear property line . 2. The new garage addition will be equipped with an automatic garage door opener . Said opener shall be installed and opera- ting prior to final inspection . AYES : Porter, Mahaffey, Bannister, Kenefick NOES : Winchell , .Schumacher ABSENT: Paone A El: TA t N : None M '�uN F CHANGE NO. ri 1- t SA ODE AMENDMENT %LQ, 1 �._81- E Ift �J,81.�.3,;,,., to ..:wL fir 1 lc.int ;_mold C���°�� pme_nt -Corporation ` -2- 1 - 19-92 P.C. Minutes, H.B. . Planning Commission Januar-y 19, 1982 ;�► Page 3 A code amendment which establishes a Specific. Plan setting forth development criteria for 60± acres of property located at th'r south" � east corner of Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue, and a request to change the zoning on the subject t property f r''an C2 (Corrmuni ty Busi- ness District) , RA-0 (Residential Agricultural District combined with oil production) , RA-01 (Residential Agricultural District corn- ` bined with oil production) , R1-0 (Lox Density Residential combined with oil production) , and R1-01 (Low hlensity Residential District combined with oil production) to Seabridge Specific Plan. Also Cori`-� sidered was Final Environmental Impact No . 81-3 which assesses the ' environmental effects of the code amendment and the zone change. Jim Barnes introduced Mr . Charles. Pi'lcher to the Conenirssion who gave an oral report of the highlights of the EIR which his company,► EDAW, Inc . , prepared . Chairman Winchell opened the public hearing. Frank Mola, the appli- cant, gave a prepared taped presentation of the project. Richard Harlow also spoke in favor of approving the EIR along with the zone change and code amendment . i The following pers;+ils spoke in opposition to the certification of the EIR and the approval of the zone change And code: amendrnents Dan Lispi , Resident John DuVa 1 , Resident Jim Keef, Resident John Corgonot Resident Irwin Haydock, Chairman of Environmental Board Mike Molde, Resident The main issues raised in the teis'timony against approval were as follows s 1 . Impact of 1600 new inesidents in the area with 80 (this f igur-e . was questioned) elementary school children entering the local , school district . !t was brought to the attention of the Com- mission thtit Pederson Elementary School was recently closed. 2 . Loss of park lane, and wetland area . 3 . Incompatibil ; ty with original General Plan and overall Image of the area . opposition to high density in the area . 4 . objection of the U. S. Department of Fish and Garner to the adequacy, of t?r_ EIR. 5 . No mention of access streets through eeisting realdences. -3- 1-19-82 .. P. C. 1! Minutes* H. B . Planning Conunission January 19, 1982 Page 4 6 . Deterioration of ramaining scenic corridor. 7. Shadow effect of buildings on solar access . 8 . Will engineers desxgn. buildings with fault line taken into con- sideration. 9 . Need for bikeway, equestrian trails, etc. , along the flood control channel . 10 . '10% addition to traffic volume on surrounding major arterials (Why were figures taken from 1978 data and not recent computer figures?) 11 . Who will pay for "open water system"? Possible water waste. 12 . Regarding sewerage - if florid control channel is built too high, project will be underwater. 13 . Against removal of existing eucalyptus trees. 14 . Wildlife in the area is threatened. The public hearing was closed . The consensus of the Ccnmissioners was that due to public testimony, they would feel uncomfortable about dealing with the applications until more clarification was presented . Also mentioned was burial of the oil lines prior to development . Staff stated that questions of this nature could be dealt With at the time of the tentative tract application. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY BANNISTER ZONE CHANGE NO. 81- 15, CODE AMENDMENT NO. 81-16 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 81-3 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF FEBRUARV 2, 1982, BY THE FOLLOW-- ING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Paone ABSTAIN: None ':0NL)1T1JNAL USE PERMIT NO. 91-30 g1�� r Ants: - Mike Na t l j Theron Carter A reduent devpcesltotbe forraubl.icous,eoar'e than four (4 ) coin-operated amuseme p t property located on 'the east side of lolsa Chica Street, north of 'darner Avenue. The public hearing was opened. Theron Carter, the: applicant, spoke in favor of yranting the application . 'rha public hearing vas closed. hunftton beach developm)Mt servic*s department STAf f E P O RT NO TOv Planning Commisaion FROM: Department of Development Services DATE: : ' February 20 1982 SUBJECTr ZONE CHANGE NO. 81-15 f CODE AMENDMENT NO. 81-16f ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 81-3 (SEABRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN) On January 19, 1982 the Planning Commission continued Zone Chinge 81-15, Code Amendment 81-16 , and EIR 81-3 pending the submission of additional in, formation supplementing the EIR. Staff has coordinated with EDAW, Inc . to° prepare the attached document supplementing EIR 81--3. The supplement addresses the environmental issues identified by the Planning Commission at its January 19 meeting. Also attached is a revised specific plan document prepared by , the appli- cant incorporating the suggested revisions contained in Section 6 . 0 of the January 19 staff report and a letter from the applicant (dated. January 26, 1982) suggesting options for ensuring that the development concept being proposed is ultimately carried out . In response to the Planning Commission ' s concerns regarding the general intent and function of a Specific Plan, staff has attached sections of 1�11he Public Resources Code pertaining to Specific Plans . In the staff ' s view, what a Ppecific Plan is and how it functions are best described by a comparison with the General Plan. The purpose of the General Plan is to express in general terms the City ' s planning of its future environment. : As itn name implies, the General Plan functions as a general blueprint oz future development within the City. The General Plan is adopted by the City- as a legislative act and may thereafter- be amended as required by changing circumstances . The Specific Plan, on the other hand, is a device used to implement the General Plan. In the simplest sense, a Specific Plan is a_ more detailed version of the General Plan . The Specific Plan focuses on a particular parcel or parcels , articulates the planning con- siderations for such. parcel.s , and imposes regulations or controls on the use of such parcels . The Specific Plan may be adopted and Amended by legislative action , and when adopted controls all development within -the affected area . The Specific Plan is a bridge between the General Plat and zoning, which serves both a planning function and a regulatory function SUGGEs,= Ac•r i m Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that Final EIR No. 81-3 ds amended be certified as being adequate - and in conformance with -.he California Environmental Quality Act and State Aft ••t�s�i r • zI� :Gull Baas. staff further `r*c m"rwIr-'thit 'the Planning 'Cow issic' n r4t�rhd -O the City Council that Zone Change No, 81-15 and ;Coda. Axes nt',Kq. 81-16 be adopted subject to the findings contained in Section 7 ;et ''of the January 19, 1982 staff report. ATTACHNNTS. �.. ' Area Kapp, Z. Seabridga Specific Plan (revised) .3 . Letter from Nola Development Corporation dated January 26, 1962 46 'January 191 1982 staff report 5. brdihanca, (zone Change 81-15) 6 Rosolution No. 1282 (SeAbridge Specific Plan) 7 . Sections 65454-65570 , Public Resources Code . JWP t JIkB d f 1 Minutes, H.B. ;Planning Commission tfbruary 2, 1982 Page 2 The public hearing was opened, Mr . Holmes, the applicant, presented a whole new conceptual plan to the Commission which still requires the use of a conditional exception. A ',MOTION WAS MADE BY MAHAFFEY AND SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 81-r88 TO THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 170. 1982 AND DIRECTING STAFF TO REFER ThE APPLICATION BACK TO BZA FOR REVIEW OF THE REVISED SITE PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Paone, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None ZONE 'CHANGE NO. 81-r15 CODE AMENDMENT NO 81--16 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 81- Continued from 1-19- 2 Aon 1cant: Mora eve g2ment Corporation A request to permit a change in zoning on a 60± acre parcel of pro. perty located on the southeast corner of Adams Avenue and Beach Boulevard, from RI-O, Rl-01 , RA-O, RA-01 and C2 to Seabridge Spe- cific Plan. Jim Barn-zs made a brief presentation to the Commission. He informed , the Commission that the Environmental Hoard put their comments re- garding the EIR and that copies were distributed to them for their perusal. Charles Pilcher from EDAW gave a presentation of a supple- mental information packet which was prepared by the firm in answer to questions asked at the last regular meeting. The following areas were addressed: solar access, trails systems, secondary ve- hicular access, cumulative traffic analysis, scenic corridor, sewage line capacity, levee height and backwater effects, elevation of r^..source production areas, energy costs and water ccnsumption, and school district contacts. Commission discussed the above concerns at length. Commissioner Prone stated that he listened to thy: tape of the public hearing and would be eligible to vote. Chairman winchell reopened the public hearing asking that the public limit their comments to issues that have not previously been dis- cussed . Speaking against the adequacy of the EIR were Dan Lisby, Steve ' Olburger, and Mike McDonald . Speaking in favor, was Richard Harlow. The public hearing was closed. Commission discussion ensued . Discussed in detail was the "quC3tion 6V accumulativeeffects of the sewer system: George Tindall of Public Works, stated that the coast , trunk line will more_ than ade 4 ti tel hwould the excess . He robably arise Irom�the treatmenther stated afacilities, hhowever, thins ` is an ongoing problem which the County of Orange is; well aware of Discussion took place regarding what determines adequacy ,or that theCEfRf is ha diRclosureedocumealin reminded the Ct�nra3.saioners Y 1, r nt and that specific mi tiga tion . mrasures `nrod not be dlscu.�ssed .to determine the adequacy of thy' EIR. r K nutes,. H.H. Planning Commission February 2, 1982 Page 3 co+hmissioners Schumacher and Bannister believe that: the increased d+�nsity and traffic impacts on Beach Boulevard would cause ' th*m to question- the adequacy of the EIR and stated that they would vote - againit' it . Commissioner Schumacher also noted that she did not 'feel ''that the study contained in the E?R on the pondi.nq area was adequate to address that issue. ON MOTION BY MANAFFEY AND SECOND BY KENEFICK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AtPORT NO. 81-3 WAS CERTIFIED AS BEING ADEQUATE BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Paone, Winchell, Porter, Mahaffey NOES: Bannister, Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None They following items were discussed by the Commission in relation to the Specific Plan: 1. Rgqe 1 __Jtgms 1 & 2, und,Cr 11CitX Council Direction" Clarify City Council direction regarding density in Areas A and B. 2. Pace 2 - Item 4, under "City Council. Direction" Clarify direction given by City Council regarding preservation Co of the ponding area . 3 . Pa2M 4_. Item F. under "Site Plan" Item F should say: "Type and Location of Outside Lighting 4 . Page 8, Item G. _under "'traffic Control" Revise this section so that approval of traffic control device is subject to the review of the Planning Commission. 5 . p§SLe 4. ltem D,, under "Aso? ication Procedure" Add a statement under "Application Procedure" requiring that all development standards in the Specific Plan be subject to the approval of the Planning Commission . 6 . PagZ 8,_ Item C. .undo "Tr,,!Lff. 1c Control " In lieu of requirement that they installation of traffic sign-6.14 bu on a fair share participation agreement - this section . shauld be revised to require that cost of the signals on Beach Boule- ' vord and Adams Avenue be financed 100% by the developer. r D.-K. under . "Ny- P„ -3.- 2-2-62 - . P.C. 1 _ -: Minutes, H. 9. Planning Commission Tebruary 2, 1982 Page 4 First sentence to be revised to read, " . the Development Services Department for review and approval. .'+ . 8 . pagg 10i §n& on M` undgr "Resource Production Areas" Clarify subsection 1 to indicate that Vioperty will be deeded to the bomeawner' s association (s) iw:.ediately. 9. elge 11, 6ecti n M "Resource Production Areas" ubsection 5- This section shall be revised as follows : "The area east of the flood control channel (Area A) shall be improved according to the preliminary lands--ape plans whfch are to be submitted with the application for development" . Clarify location of the restored marsh and direction given by City Council pursuant to discussion presented in Item #2, above. 11 . wiz 12, Section O, "Development Standards" , Sub, sort ion 1-A This section shall be revised to read, "Attached or detached units and related recreational facility" . wr 12. page 12, "Dgns i ty Standards" . Area B Add standards pertaining to total number of bedrooms allowed . Clarify density in Area B. Research the ratio for establish- ment of number of bedrooms allowable under the provisions of Article 936 of the Ordinance Code. 13. Eaqe 13, "Perxmeter Setback" Add provision providing that the grade differential on adjacent property to the east and :youth shall not exceed one foot. 14 . !age 13, "Building Height." Clarification on method of measuring building height . Develop terminology to require variation in height . 15. ?ages 14 a s. "Building Bulk" Sta►ter►,nnts under Su(--Area A, a, b, and ' , and Sub--Aron 8, a and b, shall be revised to include the word "shall" in lieu of the Mr• word "should" 16. Ps Si.#.,.1 .._.."..AuJI.41n i. 3e2;.r.4tign_ + - . AWZ= Minutes, - H.H. Planning Commission February 2, 1982 Page 5 This section shall be reviee►d to read as follows: "where open parking is provided on the same level as that portion of the dwelling used for human habitation, the minimum separation shall be 10 feet on a horizontal plain" . 17. Ra10-11.. "Aulld„ina_ ,$eoarat,ion". Area 8 Minimum separation between buildings should be increased . A provi- sion for obliquely aligned buildings shall be establiahed-, 18 . P_,aae _ 15, ''ORgn Space, area A This section shall be revised to require 1, 200 square feet In lieu of 800 square feet . 19. I!aQe 5., 1102en 52agell,, Area _B4. Subsection A This provision pertaining to a 50% credit for resource produc- tion areas shall be deleted . 20. Page 16, Item 8, "Main Recreation Area" , Subsection 8 This section shall be revised to read as follows : "Residential units shall not be located closer to the main recreation area • than 20 feet" . ,,,' 21 . Page 15, "Open S,pacg" Add provisions requiring that the maximum square footage require- ments for common open space shall not satisfy any requirement of Article 974 and Artical 996 of the Ordinance Code relating to park and recreational facilities. 22. Paae 13. "Private Accessways" Standards for private accessways shall be consistent with 3tan- dards in Article 936 of the Ordinance code . 23 . ,J!agF 19lParkinq". Subsection D The provision pertaining to a credit for parking provided on a drive approach shall be revised to be consistent with the provision in Article 936 of the Ordinance Code . 24. P.aag 20, "Pa r)SI nc" . Subsection G The provision allowing compact parking shall be subject to further study. 25. Page 19. "�..�i.ina! A-....S29tio1g, A AH Cover*d parking speeNt-, shall be contiguous to the dwelling unit -5- 2-2.1.5 2 Minutts, H.B. Pianninq commission February 2, 1982 Page 6 for which it will, serve. 26. xce`21.4 "Qable TVIR Provisions shall be added for a common antenna . 27 . Jan"cape Cotgidor Consideration should be given to applying appropriate provisions pertaining to a landscape corridor. 26. R.Au"5, "ARn arance Standards" ` Suj2secti�on�C This section shall be revised as follows: Particular attention shall be given to incorporating the design of signs including colors of signs, into the overall design of the entire develop- ment in order to achieve a uniformity. 29. Eag*_26A Item 1. -26PUoval Period" This shall be revised to conform with State law. A MOTION WAS MADE BY BANNISTER AND SECONDED BY PAONE To TIE THE PROJECT PLAN TO THE SPECIFxC PLAN SO THAT THEY WOULD BE ADDRESSED L.. BY THE COMMISSION AT THE SAME TIME. THIS MOTION FAILED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Bannister, Mahaffey NOES: Kenefick, Paone, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Corranissioner Paone made a motion to process the zono change, condi- tional use permit and the tentative tract at one time and to recom- mend that the City Council; in the form of a resolution, adopt a development agreement with the applicant showing a specific time frame. Commissioner Bannister seconded this motion . After some discussion, Commissioner Paone withdrew his motion and Commissioner ea nnister withdrew his second. ON MOTION BY PORTER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK CODE AMENDMENT 80. 81-.16 . AND ZONE CHANCE NO. 81-15 WERE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF rEBRUkky 17, 1982, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Paone, Winchell , Porter, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: Bannister ABSLKT: None STAIN: None �+ •,, , . Chairman winchell ,called for a 5-minute receen. Commission m*etinq , .• ', t resuomd at 1100 0 Ph. JL -6w 2-2-82 - P.C. a � huntington beach develoumant s*rvicoa department STAf f REPORT ,_......r.. , - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: February 17 , 1982 SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 81-15jCODE RMENDMENT NO. 81-16 (SEABRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN) On February 2, 1982 , the Planning Commission continued zone Ctia.nge No. 81-15 and Code Amendment 81-16 to allow the developer and staff sufficient time for preparation of their responses to the concerns expressed by the Commission regarding the proposed Specific Plan. The applicant, in the attached letter and revised Specific Plan document, has itemized the com- ments _expressed by the Planning Commission and presented responses to each comment . The staff has reviewed the tape of the June.. 15, 1981 City Council hearing to attempt to clarify ,direction given by the City Council regarding density and preset vation of the ponding area . In the staff ' s view the Councille direction was to permit a maximum of 600 units on the entire site, with 400 units on each side of the flood control channel. Through testimony, it was understood by the City Council that the existing pond on the site would be re-configurated . tom_ After reviewing the applicant' s proposed modifications to the Specific Plan document, staff recommends the following changes : 1 . Page 12 DENSITY STANDARDS . The applicant has introduced provisions for the maximum number of bedrooms per gross acre . Staff recommends that the maximum number of bedrooms allowable per gross acre in Area H be established at 50 bedrooms per acre , which is consistent with R3 District standards . 2 . Page 13 PARKING. The applicant is proposing that the parking standards for effic ency units be reduced from 2 spaces per unit (as previously proposed) to 1,. 5 spaces per unit . Staff recommends that this standard remain at 2 parking spaces per unit. RECOMMENDATION : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that Zone Change No. 81-15 and Code Amendment No. 81-16 be adopted by resolution, subject to the findings contained in Section 7.0 of the January 19 , 1982 staff report and pursuant to previsions _CZ abY3idgc "sp►'citic, Plan February .'1T,.' 1992 A'1 au' ..ostid i � j.- ,. the 99 ,� n tt► ' Februa�r 10 19A2 la�tt+�r' subwitted by , pp icant; .:-and , o t?� r to f f rt�,Oiamenda t io'n• s to tad' above. ATTACHMAN'ti_ • L. 2. 8 a'b"rrid94 Specific 'Plan (R vixed) ��.3. L iter,: Prow Bala Development Corporation dated January 260 1982 4 . January, 19, '1982 Staff Report 5. . 'Oidi"nenC461• (Zone ,dhanges 81rl5); a,6. Rion 7. Sections�65450 65570 ' Public Reiburc' es - _ Plan) , rces � Code ' 8 . Lettar from Mla Development Corporation` dated rebruary 10, 1982 . J'WP JRB:d f Mnutes, H. R. 'Planning Cpccrnission Fabruary 17, L9 2i; Page 3 PPLICANT TIME TCtMEET iMI''i''H T13E, BC)ARD OF BONING ADJUS'TMEN'1.`5, SON:' RCIi 3, . 1962 , , „ : : . t air�i�l Atlt) FOR ,I'NE Fjt3AttA'.120 R�.POtiT BACK ' .ro' THE,.WIAMISSION ,ON . A REVISED PhAl1 , BY THE FbLUNXNG VOTE : " AYESES: Konefit;k, Paine, "Wi'ncheil, Porter, Schumaclher,;rMahaffey, NO : Non ` ABSEt�'I' Ba nn.i site r ABSTAIN: Noae 1 ZONE CHANGE' NO". 181--).5/CdC)E AMENDMENT N0: 81-16 (Cont. Z-82) •'. � licant : . Mo at , e-velo, pinent orpora ion 1'll1 t�o• pe i `a• chartigeo f zone e from R1-0 R1"OT, RA 0, 'I RA=d1, a d C2 to Seabridge ! Specitic; Plan on property located on the scio heaat corneii off Adams '�A%ienue: I,and Beach Boulevard. ` r ' 71f lIR^ • t - .1� �7'I . � Jh'P,; 1r���� i%t• Jim 'earnest infa�.med 51' Commission that ��the, concerns;�'reise.d by e, ; 'khe, hearing on%4•YN} jbr�:a it j.2, 1992 Nave been ' responded;; to by the ,sppli. 11.. 4:' . .11) � . the sp �ci.!=ic plan revised '�to incorporate. these. cancecns. , . cant- and , Heb, also,,reviewed'. two ;sta f f.'recoi mendations for chang:� in ;the apeci • w fic,, plan;; in • re&A'r , to `'dens1ty and parking ratio; iliea*e WOr'e;• dis- y , y consensus inclmdPd� in th11 specific plane Very hex f'Gmsn. f) � P, rind b conso .. .r ,discussion • toabc , . o' tte ,:t��nsive ,°,discussi place in,,regarcl t request for a �lpercentage of parking to be compact spacers!, and ai straw Vote produced the following results IN FAVOR OF COMPACT SPACES: Paone, Porter, Mahaffey: . OPPOSED TO COMPACT SPACES: Kenefick, Winchell , Schumacher The Commissdon then discussed t0a effect ofl leaving ;a, lrov lion compact• pa'rkirig .in the specifi.c..plan document',,a'nn1 ' Secretary Secretary'� informed them that a future request for 'comp'hctl Pali j,car parking would not ;,,requireila special ; permit because it had ,been provided for 'in the specific plan, but the:' number and size and�� location of those spaces vou1-'A be a subject which could bye gidr1ressed in the conditional use pexmi t 'f i led for the project, ON.:MOTION. BY PORTER AND SECOND BY PAONE THE SPECIFIC,' Pt.11N �REirER- ENCE TO COMPACT C;AK PARK iNr, WAS RECOMMENDED TO BE RE--WORDED AS FOI.I.OWS , BY TUS VOLt,OWING VOTE : ' " parking spaces ws I. Any ;,a 1 toca,tion ;.,for'. ,compact car ' thin Area t3 gha 1 `be determined �th�cough the conditional use permit pitncess Por any project iubject 'to this specific plan when it is submitted to the Planning Commission for approval . " AYES: Kenefici. , P-none , Winchetl , Porker, Schumal.c'her , Ma!naffey NOES : None ABSENT: Damn i 3 tier 40" ABSTAIN: Non,' Provision for. TV service was discussed and a chr(nge recom.mended te.) `,' state tha't' no c.xtorior. television Antennas should be per.-Pitted , MiAu s, 'N.b. Plane 'nq comaksgion F4A;ivaiy A7, 1982 pa►q� • 111 11 1 hr4t .that' A,•commoA ,;antennat; with; underground cable servii�e ` to .tll riwehling ,units ;',1*! proVided:' This, change was +recomcsendfd by consensus aotiun, of :.the 'coiRairesion . 1�'r'�IJ :ti.�(f 7!.t.,.�/��4•SM=r' G.�:�:'t k l�'rx+�' a''.i•f rJF)St'�, i� r ,S'•��, �.,`�� . •er��'i+� ! S' � ChairrtcanWinchl"1� noting the�t' the wording' rt�gardinq ;buil dinq stpaia rri s a . .,f! •. 1r k�.y y... 1• a E, �. i ,. lien �be:.wcen 'obl� uely.. "alig»ed >buldings: is' not clear, asked ' that 'the } word n,4r be .c'' nge`d '.toy specify theti.:any;'decreaise in ' separiElp' n at..one� cori othor�enf "tiu�hisn�chanheuwr�sb�oncurxed .wed by ��s like_ increase at; 'the g mpensat d . g ith by` the rest of "the Plan- n,1'*' -commiasion. Tl UN. MOTI O - BY.''POkTER AND ' ;. SECOND BY ; KENEF'ICK CC1UE* AMEYDMtENT,, N0. 8146, ; �r `(SEABRIDGE, SPECIFIC PLAN)',: WAS APPROVED, AS AMENDED ABOVE BY THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION , NO . 12820, FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, BY THE F'OLL.OWING VOTE: AYES: Kenafick, Phone, Winc:hell , Porter , Mahaffey NO1:S Schu"Mather ABSENT: Bannister ABSTAIN: Node ON, MOTION B1 PORTER 'AND,,,SECOND BY : KENEFrc :'ZONE CHANGE NO. .,81-15 r WAS.`AP.PROVED: AS hMENDED, ,ABOVE, WITH FINDINGS OUTLINED .IN , THE STAFF REPORT', FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, WITH THE ;.�Ndj FOLLOWING FINDINGS , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS : I . The Sp' ecific Plan is in conformance with the Ci.ty 's General Plan . 2 . The Specific Plan contains regulations necessary to implement spec- ific policies set forth by the City Council for development of this site. 3. The ' Specific Plan contains regulations which effectively iAigate adverse environmental impacts identified in EIR 81-3 . AYES : Kene'Eiek , Phone, Winchell, Porter, Mahaffey ►10ES : 36humacher ABSENT: Bannister ABSTAIN: None fRECtSE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT NO. 82--1/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 82-4 initiat H initiated _by the C€ of Hun�iino�!L each A precise plan of street .ilirnment which will provide access to 12 .7cres of land located on the south side of Talbert Avenue approxitmteLy 600 feet west of. Beach Doulevard. ;avoy Bellavi,, arplained that this alignment differs from an;'earlier � -l% 1ignmient approved for the area in that it will be a public, instead L of a private street and that It will be designed to also provide . 1 f , i ORDINANCE NO * . f , 1 .rt'a. r}l,_ AN OF DINANCF OF;, THE Gx'I' Y�;OF HU ZN TON�BLA,CH �a " ODD AMENDINt}h�THE t HUt�fI!INQTOHr� EACH ORDIt�A�CE�; ,, k a; BY�tIIMENDINQ9 6CTI0N; 9061 ,THRE01� "'It� ''� YIDB F,OR G�NA(Y4E,AOR� ZONL�IQ FROM CI)WtjgITY '8usiME3S r DYSTRICT,;, # rr 3 +:f`DIg�fftl' T , �. RESYDFNTIAL sAaRICULI'URAL;r G COMBINED WITH OIi,, PRODUC�'IQN, IrOw, DE13ITY RE�SIDENTIAL��`DISTRIC'r;, Ct�MHINED3.wITH ;DIL'. PRO DUCTION, AND ' LOW DENSITY-, RE.4.IDENTIAt ,'DISTRICT I C0MHINED_ W1TH,,,01 OIL PRODUCTION' TG' SEASRIDCE SPECIFIC PLAN ON REAL PROPERTY WCATSD SOUTH r OF, ADA14S AND MT OF SEACK 'SOULMARD ( ZONE � CASE NO 81--15 ) WHEREAS , pursuant to the state Planning and Zoning Latw, the Huntington Beach Planning Commisaion and Huntington Beach City Council have had separate public hearings relative to Zone 1 Case No . 81--15 wherein both bodies have carefully considered d at 't ti f i ll aid h !a . information presenesear t ngss, and ai'ter due ,cones sideration or the findings and rreommendations or the Planning Commission and all. evidence presented to tiaid City Council , the City Council. Pinda that such zone ehanee is proper, and aonsis- tent with the general., plan , NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council ar the City or Huntington ; Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1. The following described aixty acres more or less ,, of real property, generally located south or Adams. Avenue and eae t of Beach Boulevard, is hereby changed rrom C2, ,"Communl ty Busineis Dtatrict, " RA--0, "Reaidentia.l Agricultural District, " comb fined with of 1. production , R1•=0, "Low-density Reaidentlal. Dis'hrict " combined with oil. roductlon ; and R1-01 "Low-density Re.aidential District, " combined with 01 oil production, to ! Se4bridge, Speci'ric Flan: Farce-1.3 Y and 2 in the city or Huntington -tilt, r 9eaoh as per,, Map filed :tilrrd in ,3ook .15 , agaa 11, aMd .cif�Parc e]. l�tape ,in the atfice Qauntr Ree�+ord*r, 0C;'Orange County; : an, rare l 3 Y r in the aiti ,rill in Too ot: Huntington Beach as k .41- .,page'� 24 oC, Pa'r'ael- Maer Nps"' t ' the ; . offiae of the County: Recorder:; or, said county. SECTION 2. The Development .3er410ee, DLredtoe . I : hereby dl- reotted to i S'ectI oh'' g0610 District' Map 13, (Sectional. D'i - ae No. 81-15, 'described in tr ic,t map t 1�. -11) o retleet Zan& Ca . Section 1 hereof . -`A copy of said district map`, as amended hereby Is avallable for In' spection 1n the office of the City Clark. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall. take a ff at:t thi rty days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council or..-' the City, of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting the reor held on the day or �, 1982. Mayor ! ATTEST : APPROVED AS To PORK: City C e k : City Attorney; REVIEWED AND APPRO! .M : INITIATI:D ' AND APPROVED: =tl' � dip City AdminL trat rector or Deve opment Services r 2 J1J l SECTIONAL QItTkfCT MAP 12- 6, 11 CITY ,'p11 CAwtL• fir�srA rt/M M r«flufrl"�y • Iqr 1.1••• M hl•h INr � M+-. w�whiw w r� OF, a ..r M1 /,l,h 1f�. • 1.,w low t•t•lr 1" I fiwlN+•�Ri• f•1RIt It f2+t M 1IN +f*rw A� 1.rlrRlf I-11UNTINGTOTIN, BEACHA& t.1tiN �. ._ fa.1. wf. t . 1 , ' 1.'•t•1.'- IIH/ furl•++�•'f1.MS+N/f�11•r+11 l� R 1Nu .&OUN" Y, CALIFORNIA d.._f.m" 11014111111 14,111.1111 1:1a Wdill 0"W""ff*Aw w P~ 11t7 isAK 7M11w1 M.11,1•f,111.f1or.Jo.kwMfM•MI.441 % MIA". 1'f•f► � •1 ff.•0 n,i.«, I• .1r.If 149 '8 4Mf# 7 i1,h•f1,h7f f,•f•t7• 17•.1 K,'�t1i 1.r.1f NNOWN f.•/.II Mfg f1n1/AMrf fr+Yfh �.r.n its - 111011111111 .w;� f•sn•rl 1►It _ � .AApr I5LpI a •� ^I RI . RI RI RI RI IR toll r t I RI RI RI 1. ' R I 11 I lot � Zle � t S I RI RI RIM RI RI J 1 RI j AI I R1 RI RI �j A•o I A1_ -/%i ti Ci••Il R, � � AI RI RIIL oil CF-E RI{ RI RI ., 1. 1! e. .a •f x.•. RI RI . M RI RI Iof ' CF•R� AI 1- RI R� RI Rl RI RI rr•.R-» AI - " � a AI RI r RI Rf RI 7 f off Cl Irl ►� + kl 1 fll fi , CF—E 1 _r +::., RI RI 1 AI RI m RI + R' - i AI cf ' RI f t 1 AI RI RI I+1, � � A/t AMft Avtf � � ' ZC81 - Rrs 1tE50iuTj0* 00. 1262 A IMSOLUTION OF iHIC •PLANNING ;CC�MM�ISSIaM'' OT, 'TKE CITY_ Or NUNTINCTOM SUCH APPROVING TUB OthaRIDGE 01FACH/ADAMSY SPECIrIC PLAN. NMRMS'l Seotions' 65500-55507 of the 'Californ a Gove rrumat Code. •provide procedures for adoption of apedtic plans and regulations; and . WHEREAS,, a specific plan herein . ref " ' red, to"--as the .;.: "Seabridge Spec if is Flan" has been prepared containing the recommended contents of the above mentioned code section*; and [f►HEREAS the Seabridge Specific plan{provider' for development within a 60 # acre!!site located soiith>of !►dams avenue and east of Beach 8oule%►ard -which is consistent with the City!.s ' General "Plain and will 'not be`- detrimental to ' the general health, welfare, safety; ER convenience of persons working or residing in the neighborhood ; and WHEREAS , the Planning Coiaaeission of the ' City:of Huntington Beach , California has held a public hearing..,in coa4- �.,, pli'anee with the State Government Code to review said Specific Plan; • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Pla,nning' Commission hereby approves the Seabridge Specific Plan; and BE IT FURTHSR RESOLVED. that said Specific Plan• is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the 'City of, Huntington beach. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADC"Zo by the Planning' tomimis- sion of the City of Huntington _Beach# California, an the 19th day of January, 1982, by the following roll call vote: AYES: ` NOEr AI3SI:NT:, ABSTAIN: ATTEST: i V. Pa ln, Secretary Grace H. winc-hellt Chairman s S I US OLOT1014 00. A RESOLUTrM-' OI THE" CITY COUNCIL OP THE , CITY OF HUNTINOTON BEACH ADOPTINO SEABRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN (BRACK/ADAMS) WHEREAS, after; notice duly, given pursuant to government Coda section 65500, the Planning Commiaelon of the City o"f Huntington Beach held public hearing on Seabridge Specific Plan on January 190 1982 which was continued to February 2, 1982, and concluded on February 17 , .1982; and Such specific plan provides for development within a 60 acre site, located south of Adams Avenue and east of Beach Boulevard; and On March 1, 1982, after notice duly given pursuant to Government Code section 65507, hearing was held before this j Council on Seabridge Specific Plan, and the matter having been . c ons idered - the Council Pines that such specif ie plan is aonala- t tent with the city' s general plan , arW would not- be detriment il.- to .the general, health, welfare, safety and convenlenoe of persona working or realding in the immediate vicinity; and The Planning Commission has recommended adoption of the Seabridge Specific. Plan to this Council, , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDy _ y the b Cif Council of the City of Huntington Beach that Seabridge Specific Plan , as incor- porated in the document attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof , is hereby adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council or the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof hal.d on the day of_ ___w.. . 1982. Aq' h.ST: Mayor i , r , • i .r .. .. 1w FYI 'r t ` REVISVED ,AND APPROYSO: APPROM AS' TO ,FOAM: i ty A mint", 'ratoc, City A ttoM*y INITIATED AND APPROVED: irecta -of-Development S erviceb f 2. 1 %AOkA1XVC1QPWN1C0-#0IW*N1W$ADNA AVE.KATINGTGN KACK Cftf Qh*/(MW&2W, 00 41 CAMINO MAL DAYS 2K GARtSM0.CA"0061("4*W 4&n'U Miry 8, a98 x ' . a., Mr:T Jaurtiea Barnes i' Associate, PlannerTkspt , of Develooment Services CITY, OFF HUNTINGTON BEACH P O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92641 Dear Mr, Barnes : Pursuant to our earlier conversation regarding the Seabridge Specific Plain, we propose to make the following changes; A. Change the tattle to "PURPOSE". The third paragraph to read: "The following pal-- icies were adopted by the City Council to provide ' dirdction for preparation of a Specific Plan" : A. 4. - That portion of this section which is in- cluded within parenthesis will be added as a footnote at the bottom of this page. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - This section will be deleted. Exhibit "A" Reference Ma will be changed to in- el elude the o owingr: * The streets opposite the main entries will be shown ;on the map. * The drilling islands and the ,main off island wells wf11 b shown on the map. * The arrow. ideas' ti fyi g lding' n the reduced Dui , height envelope will be tied in with the 130 foot dimension. E. FLOOD PROTECT ION =- The second sentence will ' be; changed to readF PT deril Mergency Hanageraent Agency (FE M►) . " F. 3 . - Access to Ad acent Pro erties - Change to read "Private Streets and/or Drives. , . * G. TRArrrC CONTROL (second paragraph) - Chan a t0: _ read "Thc developer shams provide for the future .instaylat ion. " r Mr James Ear , CITY ,CW HUNTINGTON 89ACH •' January� 1 , 1992 Paga - two M. . TRANSIT FACILMES � ,,we will. . t bs 711noluding, than 4 Or"age, County Winilt 1S!srr'rc0t_^icPi%9 with the Department of public Works. r J. HYDROLOGY We will "include include the ' Department P 9 of Develo 'ment ervices along with the Department f o Pub- lic works. L. PERrMETE.R. S OFFER - 'The last sentence .r+ill be changed to rea s ITFe FiRial landscape plan shall be. . . M. 1 . RESOURCE PRODUCTION AREAS �t,Zhanged- to read: "The arena presently tIy esignate or Resourca pro ducti.on shall be deeded to the Homeowners Association as a part of the permanent connon open space wh*n ,all oil `pro- duction activity has ceased. " M. 3. Change to read: 74i l ..,production shallr�big in compliance with Title 15 of the Huntington ,Deach Oil ,Code . " M. 5,. (a) Changed to read: "'The area •east of the Flood Control Channel (Area A) shall be improved according s to the preliminary landscape plan submitted with the appli- ca►ti.on for development. " O. DFVEI,OPMEN -ISTA24biRDS 1 . Use's Puri fitted A footnote will be4 Addid to . - a an to.. indicate. "that-6 1 Pr I uc.tfon w3. . sub" thin thetdrilling_ islands shown on Exhibit "A" shall;":com- pl'y with the requirements of 00-1" District,' Article 968� of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The areas designated as off-island well sites shall be subject to the require- ments of the "o" District of Article 966 of the Huntin91ton Reach Code. 3. B'uiid n - Changed to r H'read "Area , five ( 5) stories or s xtyKe �`�hteet. " S . Perimeter setback Last sentence be revised to ,state: "This #equirement shall7not apply to entry mono ments , landscape features , and structures intended for safety or public use. " G . Phil lint 5e_part,on and !Setback (d) Is to be revised to state : "Between buildings , sides to side , twenty ( 20) facet. " 6. Area e - The minifaum separation between x buildings shall ave ar ge -thLrty five (35) feet. �r w ,t CITT Or NUWTYIK3TM .SZACN � 1i `January, l' ,page, three . 1 . e Canuaon 5taaca�; �1CQ< yZRE NT `w - Changad OPIN SP to* F...{,r74•�,,,� f$ �.r 1, i . '!' lisp reads ,"'rh'a . area ,;se -aside or, common open space shill be equivalent to �Ol 'of the grow habitable area of the =tsid- ential units within thus area. In aid di ta:. hd�' above changes we 'w cludin�,'re= vi' fans relating to spelling` and other minor clarifications. All of then `changes will be pursuant to our prior convey sati.on with yau. Yasy my, curs , MOLa► EVE •MENT COR ?RAT. TON P J . ola, Pre ident I FJM/cd wAxA(3m,D"t4r cc,*wcOAnm/w Ao"4 Av F R S1,AT C�► Si CA us TCN 6E/► 4264/(M)SW2547 920Mr(TU)eae•W February 10, 1982 '+` XGTO."V OEA+CM N AN1►IJNG DES. 21 1 Huntington Beach" Planning Commission FEB r 2000 Main Street Huntin ton Beach CA 92648 g r P. 0. 801 190 HurlirLotm is h, CA 92 Re : Seabrdge Specific Plan Dear Commissioners .- We have attached a revised draft of the Soabridgt specific Plan. This draft incorporates many of the sugge s:ions : offered by the Planning Commission at the February 2 , 1992 mastingr. ,.. rn 'order to facilitate discussion of our proposal, we halts listee- the comments recommended by members of the Planning CommLssion. and our responae to the comments . we have also noted in the margin, the sections which have been changed ( sees ape cific + Plan document) . 1. Pace 1, Items t i 2 , under- "City Council Direction" Clarify City Council d1rectien regarding deebsity in Areas A and a . comment ; We believe our ,plan is consistent with the criteria adopted by the City Council whin Land Use Amendoeint No. 8174 was adapted. 2. Page 2 , rtem 4 p under— "City Counci t Direction" r 'o�i/Irw � Clarify diredtion given by the City Council regarding are3e,:vation of the ponding area , Comment : See il. 2 . Page 4 , f L ott: D "APpGICATION PROCEUU99" At Id a statex-ant under "APPLICATroN PROCSOURV retquirinq tM'At all development s t•Anda rdn in the Specific plan be subject to the appeaviil of the P : ai%ninq ,ComissLan. •J�' 1 tt.�: Planning Cc audiSa ion M Xiibruary 100 1982 Pace Z , 3. Conti` . ed t _ nu ) , Comment: The .`.intent of , this recommendation is uncleiar; ,,,however, ,ewe wilt reuse the plan to require Planning Commission approval of all exceptions to the - basic requirements . 4. PPaase��4 ,: +Item f, un der D . 2 . cite Plan Item f ahould say: "Type and Location of Outside Lighting. " Comrient : We agree and have made the change. 5 . Page 8,_ Item Gs under "TRAFFIC CONTROL" Revise this section so that approval of traffic devices are subject to review of the Planning Commission. Comment : We agree and have mace the change . 6 . Page- 6 , Item G, "TRA Frc ' CONTROL" ; In lieu of the re uirement that ,th' q e installation of traffic section shculd be an abeait revised@toarti re u' iretion thatdcost' of theTzisnals 9 9 � on Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue be financed 1001 by the developer . Comment : We agree and have made the change . 7 . Page 9 , Section K, "NOISE" First '`sentence to be revised to ream=:, " : the development Servi6es Department for review and ai. Iroval Conwient: Ve agree and have made tt ;, _ change. 8 . Pace 10 , Section M, under " RESOURCE PRODUCTION AREAS" Clarify Subsection I to indicate that 'property will be deeded to the homeowner 's associst.ion (s) im, madiate.ly . Comment: We agree and have made the change . 9 . Page 11 , Section M, " RESOURCE PRODUCTION AREAS" , Subsection 5 (a) This section ,-shall be revised as follc.1,4s r "The area east of the flood control channel (Area A) shal_1 be improved .�. according to the preliminary IandscaPpe" lans which are to 'be submitted - wt th the application Eor development. " `' Hr�. PZannnq Come'i�is `dl'1 iibru&ry 101, 1982 Page 9. (Continued) Comment : tie ee a r an�j{ I� g have made the change. ' .• page 1l�, SiA � r 1Q„ b�ectionti .S ('( b) Clari , {. fy loaaition of the restox d ; maarsh and direction given by City Council puxsuant to discussion presented in Item 02. Comment: See # 1. 11. Page 12, Sectio» Of_"Develo 'in ' ` t atandard3" , 5utisection 1-a This secti'b'n sitC "Attach' all be revised to read, "Attached or detached units and related recreational facility. " ,f1 Comment: We,-' agree to make this change; however , we. are f' proposing duplex units along the perimeter adjacent to the single family homes . 12 . Page 12 , "Density Standards , Area B Add"stand"ards pertaining to totaVnumber of bedrooffill allow"'-" " Clarify density in Area B. Research, the ratio for establSsnment of number of bedrooms allowable under the provisions of Article 936 of the Ordinance Code. Comment : We ;ag'ree and have made the change. . Fox informa- tional purposes , the R2 District permits 38 bedrooms per uc're, R3 District permits 50 bedrooms per acre, and the R4 District permits 53 bedrooms per acre. ' 13 . Page 13 , "Perimeter Setback" Add provision providing that the grade differential on adjacent property to the east and south shall not exceed one foot. Comment: We agree , however, we have inserted the requirement under "L.. PERV ETER BUFFER" , ( Page 9) . 14 . Page 13, ""Building Neigh t" C.iarigication on the method of measuring building height. Develop terminology to require var,fation in height. ' J 'f " ' .a•. glann nq Comaiisifan 'February 10 1902 Pag7 ;4' • r 14.' (Continued) 9 `., . 9� w., ��rrn Bui comment'. We :a ree and recorcmend :,usin the �Unif t• ldirtg •, ' . •,. st wariati'It ... ding ;K Code,:definition of 9uil• , _ r ,f � ,, . fn/bufldirq If�ficul t to ,achieve craative` on , . , design :by ord; na nce . We beIi.eve i t . can beat be accomplish ` 1h site ;plan review►.,,. 'Phis, is ec� `khrou available to the P inning Commi.asion.l.with' the requirement for a Conditional Use ! Pe Mit application. ,15. Pages r14 6 15 "Building Hulk" r ++.� r - Statements,'` under; Area A, Subsections a, 'b and, c; and Area B , Subsections a and b shall be revised to include the ward "shall" in lieu of the word "should" . Comment: We agree and have made the change . 16 . Page 1.4 , "Building Separation and Setback" , Area A, Subsection h i This section shall be revised to read as follows : "Where, open parking .is provided on the same level iris.; that "portion of the dwelling used for human habitation , the minimum separation shall be 10 feet on a horizontal plane. Comment : We agree and have made the change. 17. Page 111 , "Building Separation*_, Area B Minimum separation between buildings shiould be increased. A provision for obliquely aligned buildings shall be established, Commerit : We agree and have made the change . 18 . Page 15 , _"02en Space" , Area A This 'section shall be revised to require 1 , 200 square fe4,_- in lieu of 800 ' square feet. Comment': We propose a 1, 000 square foot per unit require- ment and have, am��nded the plan accord ngly,. This provides an open space requirement that averages the lour density requirement ( 1 , 200 square feet) and the medium density requirement (800 square fert) . Y f A :B plannf n q ' Commi ssian Eehsiia ry 100 1982 19. Pala 15 , Open Space , Area B, Siibsectian (a� This provision, pertaining 'to a 501 credit for resource • production areas shall be deleted. Commen ; rt: �.' We agree and have made . the change. . . 20 . Page' 1'6l ; Item VB , "Main Recreation Area" , Subsection (b) ir- r r � .��ta��— ter+.. ram. ►. ■ w This section n shall be, reef sud to ' rsad as follows;a •: Res identia1 units shall not be located closer to the main recreation than 2a feet. " Comment: We agree and have made the change. 21 . Pale "i5 , "OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT" reaufrementsnforacommon open�stacemshall�notusatisf Cage P. 4 9 Q n requfretaent of Article 974 and Article996 of the Ordinance Code relating to park and recreational facilities . Comment : We agree and have made the change. (See page 16) 22 . Page 18 , "Private Access Ways" Standardo for private access ways shall be consistent with standards in Article 936 of the Ordinance Code. , Comment: We understand this to apply to the entry standards and have made the change. 23 . Page 19 , C . 13 . Parking (d) The provision portaLnLng to a credit for parking providcd ' on a drive approach shall be revised to be .cons is tent with the provision in Article 936 of the Ordinance Code. Comment : We agree and have made the change. 24 . The provision allowing compact parking shall be subject to further. study. Comment : We are dropping our request for , coaipact car parking within Area A, and have modified the: proposal to allow 251 of the required parktnq within o%rea © to "be compact card' . Akio, we have rev{.ned the parking requirement for efficiency ; units to one and one-half ( IS) on-site parking spaces per unit rather than two 2) spaces per, unit . r � - .; H.�. Planmitig" Comsiiincfon f February 10 , . 19 a 2 ; Page ' 24 .' 'Comment ; (Continued) ; Re b elieve the ratios of -'parking spaces:, per. unit 66ie c16.sE`ly­ reLate to unit size than the present code. requirements . Also, since this pair%ing will either be open or within a parking structure, there will be maximum efficiency of use. 25. Page 19 , "P&ikkinq",, Areas A H �r Covered parking spaces shall be contiguous to the dwelling i unit for which t will serve. , Comment : We understand this comment to apply only to Area','A and we agree with the principle ; however,, because there are two ( 2) levels of dwellings , we propose that the garages and -units be within the same building rather than contiguous . Within Area , A. we believe the 200 foot requirement is reasonable. 26 . Pile 21, "Cable TV" Provisions shall be added for a common antenna . Comment: we agree and have made the change . 27 . Landscap corridor Consideration should be given to applying appropriate provisions pertaining to a Landscape corridor . Comment : We agree and have included a new. section dealing with this subject. (See [gage 25) 28 . Page 25 , "�2pearanct_ Standards" , Subsection c This section shall be revised as follows : Particular attentioLl shall be given to incorporating 'the design of signs including colors of signs , into the overaill design of the entire development in order to achieve it uniformity . Colmnent : We at,lree and have made the change. 29 . Pa(Ze :6 , I t m L, "Aliproval Pa r tom" This shall be revised to conform with State Law . Comment: We agree and have made the c:!.inhe. ��f �Co ,,aion '; z l' 4dditLoh to:, the . changes ..atated we have added new section .dealing' with Project Signs ''"(page .76 ) and `-a section that will only`°',permLt duplex units within Subarea A-1 (page 14) . I ho , this letter will be 1'of asaistanct to dour rev i.e w Of the'''Speac f C. plan . we will be available: to diacuss these changes with 'you at "the February 17, 1982 public hearing . Thank yo'ia for conefderinq this request. 'eery truly yours, MOLA DEVt-LORWENT CORPORATION .r Fran Hola, President cqt y v' t MOV OWKC"ANT COipOAATION/KM AD*V A AVE.HUNTWGTON KACK CALIF 9MO/(7W)SW250 6994 EL CAMINO REAL SWE 21L CAR1.911 O.CA 92 01/(PA)4311- T February 16, 1992 i`GTC!1. BEACH VL WING DEPT. Mr`-. Jfunili' Palin Direcor • FEg � � 198� bepte of Development Services CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P. a. Daa 130 P.O.Box 190 f iuntiroan Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Reach, CA 92648 Re: Seabridge Specific Plan Dear Mr . Palin : This is to advise you that Mola Develcoment Corporation is in agreement with the add i t.iona 1 chainges recommended by ,the Planning Commission for the Seabridge Specific Plan at their February 17, 1982 hearing . For your convenience we have 'listed the reconmended changes and our response. • 1 . Page 12 , "Density Standard" Recommended change that the ;yraxium number of bedrooms allowable per gross acre within Area a be established at 50 bedrooms per gross acre . Comment : We agree; with this chAnde . 2 . P 13 , Section 6 . (e ) Recununcnded change is ds follows : "In order to provide 'for • obliquely aligned buildings the distance specified abova • may be decredned at one corner of a building if the seper- ation j L the other corner is increaaeci by an equal or greater distan,i�.,e . In no case . . . " Comment : We agroa and have made the change. 3. page__ 19, ..pa g" it is recommended that the number of parking spaces for effeciency units within Area B remain at two narking spaces per unit. ' Comment : Wig agree and have made the change . 1 , YN CpMN:f`.1,.7w w•1 Mr. James • Palin , Director CITY ''OF HUNTIN4;TON REACH February 18 , 1982 -• Page two 4 . Page 20, No 13 . (1) "Parking" r • 1 , 9 end`• as . folio. Rion fvr com ac t car arkin/ coenmended•,chan eshould r � ws: . "7�►tsy' alloca- tion, � - ed through C9ndptio within. Area 9 shall .•ti � spaces be determin g o i nai. else Permit process .. for any project ,'subject to this specific plan , when it is submitted to the Planning Commission for approval. " Comment: We agree and have made the change. S . Page 21, No. 16 "Cable T..'/."' Recommended change: "Noexterior television antennas shall be permitted. A common antenna with underground cable service to all dwelling units shall be provided: " Comment : We agree and have made the change. �k Attached herewith is a revis:ed Specific Plan reflecting ttie changes we have agreed to at: well as the definition submited for consideration with our 'proposal. If you have any questions concerning this proposal feel free to Gall on us at anytime. Very tr ly yours , MOGAPenC ENT CORPORATION Fran Pres FJM/cak enclosure 1�� O • ' 1 z . z PI AMNtN tWpT ttuntirigtiop each Planning Commission ' 2=' Main St. FEB 1 0 ,c►) Huntington Beachx California 92647 Pe D• ddx 190 Re : Mola Development Beach/Adams Hunr��M , ' 48 Dear Commissioner: After, att 'nding another planning commission meeting, I . came home frustrated. I, do not know if any of you have ever been through this kind of an ordeal$ but. it is frustrating.. p: For two, years we have attended first planning commission meetin6s then City Council meetings and now back to the planning commission. , We still do not know anymore about this matter th5n we did before. At the onset of this development we had nearly 19900 signatures on a petition and packed the chasers,. both`uPstairs and down- stairs, our numbers have dwindled, due to burnout and frustration, I feel certain that Mr. Mola will eventually get the approval to do exactly as he wants, but I will not ,give up. This in a very emotional issue for the people in our area. I know if I ever tried to address the board or commission that I would choke but I feel all the issues have been brought to your attention previously. Please consider all the people who live in our area before you reach a decision on the density of the new development. our future security and happiness is at stake. I don' t feel we , have been unreasonable, Jest concerned. Thin has been my first exper' ens:e of seeing politics in action. I have never missed an election of any kind and I study the issues carefully, but it seems to me ou:• elected officials do not really represent the people . Perhaps that is why so Mani people choose not to exercise their refight to vote. Thank you for all your community involvement and dedication. Unda Kce f 20161. Cape Cot tare Lane t(tintLngton i1c,:ichi (:.1. 90611C } VAN OP. SOWN AGIIWV eswu�o a. sso x,Cowell" OVAKTMEW OF : RM AND GAME �;. ..w,t 4. I.- N atih si;tr•tt .I .Gr. -i BEACH ccasento, CA 9581�4 hl ANNING DEPT. 916) 445--3531 FEB 19 1982 • . P. 0. Box 190 wurti.--m owe?-, .• 4R February 16, 1982 Mr. Jawed Ro , Barnea, Associate Planner City. of. iiuntington .beach Department :of Development Services P. 0. Box 190 lHunttngton Beach, CA 92648 ' Dear Mr. Barnes., We have reviewed Finai• EIR 81-3 for the Seabridge Specific Plan (SCR $1060664) and find that the project is relatively unchanged from that reviewed In the draft document. Therefore, the convents and recomrrendatiens provided in our letter of December 28, 1981 continue to express our position regarding this project. Additional ly, the City 'c response to our comments on the EIR and, propaied project are inadequate by standards of CEQA. We believe that the ,general _ . discui�s.ion of our reco�ndations for protection of wetland resoorces within the project site and the Implications of those recommendations upon re ides tail development does not comply with Cleary vs County of StaniaLaus 118 Cal. App. 3d 348 'Calif. Rptr. The court ruled; "In particular the major issues raised when the Lead Agency's position is at variance with recoseo:ndations and objections raised in the comments must be addressed in detail giving reasons why specific coamnts and suggestions were 'not accepted, and factors of oyerriding importance warranting an overide of the suggestions." We therefore cannot concur with the certification of the document in its present fora and recamitend that the document be revised to comply with this Cleary Decision. Thank you for the opportunity to rtyiew and comment an this document. It you have any questions, please contact Fred A. Worthley Jr. , Regional Manager, Region 5, at 350 Colden Shore, Long beach, CA 90802; telephone number (213) 590-5113. Sincerely, C_ -- Di��ctor REVISED RESPONSE TO STATE. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME COMMENTS DATED DECEMBER 28, 1981 A a meeting which took place on February 25 , 1982 between staff of, the City, of Huntington Beach, the State Department of Fish and Game, and the State Office of Planning and Research, : it was, agreed that, the : City would revise its reponse to comments submitted by the Department of Fish and Game pertaining p � P � 9 gcal^ bssessa-in to the biolo ment contained in EIR 81-3 . Pursuant to the a reement reached by the ;agencies present at the February 25 treating, the following re�- vi's'ed response is focused on the Department of Fish .and GameIs � reconmpndation that the existing wetland area defined by. Coastal. salt_ .maiih vegetation on the development site be isitained and de' v- eloped , into ',a functioning saltwater marsh ' 'ecosystem ,now instead of postponing development of the saltwater marsh project-until terr►- ination of oil extraction. Residential development could then pro- ceed within the oil production areas when the wells are, abandoned . Also, Fish and Game believes public access roads leading from Beach Boulevard into Area A on the site should be allowed only if the wetland resource would not be adversely affected . The applicant is proposing to develop access roads and residential units in a major portion of the existing w6 tland and to mitigate the loss `of this existing coastal marsh habitat by providing ;replace- ment marsh habitat in an ext.sting oil production area when all oil. production activity has ceased. A freshwater marsh adjacent . to Beach Boulevard will. be developed immediately in the existing pond- ing area and will represent partial compensation for the immediate loss of habitat . Following are specific factors of overriding importance which in the view of the Department of Development Services make the applicant ' s proposal more acceptable than the alternative proposed by the Department of, Fish and Game : 1. A recent amendment to the 5tatc EIR Guidelines , as well as a number of other environmental protection laws, requ t re that a lead agency consider housing effects in long with envi ronment:d t goals in .its evaluation of a project . Fish and Came ' s proposal would eliminate approximately 150 residential units proposed for zi dr--term construction in Area B. As , stated ir, the City ' s pre- vious response to Fish and Game ' s conurents , the Housing Element to the General Plan stresses the current need for increasing the housing stock . it is likely L -c-iE Lie un1.t types proposed in Area 9 will meet current criteria for affordability as defined in the City ' s Housing Element and thus will be consistent with another major goat recently adopted by the City. 2 . Fish and Game ' s proposal may reyulrc relocation of the main collector street within the development connecting Adams Avenue and Beach Boulevard . The main collector street as proposed intersects Adams Avenue and Beach Boulevard at locations which are adjacent to at.hCr 10ca1 streets and are sufficient distances from the Beaeh1Adomn intersection to allow for signal ization. ti 11